HomeMy WebLinkAboutPawlowski, PaulSOUTIIOLD, TRUST
Issued To..~d~~
Address ~ ~t . ' '
THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION
TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971
TEL.: 765-1892
Jill M. Doherty, President
Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President
James F. King
Dave Bergen
John Bredemeyer
Town Hall Annex
54375 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN
APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO
SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE
PERMIT.
INSPECTION SCHEDULE
__ Pre-construction, hay bale line
__ Ist day of construction
% constructed
__~ Project complete, compliance inspection
Jill M. Doherty, President
l]ob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President
James F. King
Dave Bergen
John Bredemeyer
Town Hall Annex
54375 Main Road
P~O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO:
Please be advised that your application dated ~ / ~ [/ , has
been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of
and your application has been approved pending the completion of the following items
checked off below.
Revised Plans for proposed project
__. Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00)
__ 1st Day of Construction ($50.00)
~ Constructed ($50.00)
Final Inspection Fee ($50.00)
__ Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.)
Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of
Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in
Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code.
The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary.
You will receive your permit upon completion of the above.
COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES:
TOTAL FEES DUE:
BY:
Jill M. Doherty, President
Board of Trustees
Jill M. Dohe~ty, President
Bob Ghosio, Jr~ Vice-President
James F. King
Dave Belgen
John Bredemeyer
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (631 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Field Inspection/Worksession Report
Date/Time:
PAUL PAWLOWSKI requests an Administrative Permit to install a 6' fence
surrounding the rear yard. Located: 2404 Camp Mineola Rd., Mattituck.
SCTM#122-9-7.20
aof area to be impacted:
Itwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland
Sound Bay
Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland
Part of Town Code proposed work falls under:
~jTccapt.275 Chapt. 111 other
Type of Application: P'/"Wetland __Coastal Erosion
~Administrative__Emergency Pre-Submission __
~Amendment
Violation
Info needed:
Modifications:
Conditions:
Present Were:_ J~.King. __(" J'~. D0h e rty __~' J"~.J. Bredemeyer
B.Ghosio, D. Dzenkowski other
Form filled out in the field by
Bergen
Mailed/Faxed to:
Date:
BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
PERMIT NO. 6620 DATE: MAY 16,2007
ISSUED TO: DAVID SHAMOON
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2404 CAMP MINEOLA ROAD EXT. MATTITUCK
SCTMg 122-9-7.20
AUTHORIZATION
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapte~ 111 of the Tov~a Code of the Town of
Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on
~ and in consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by David Shamoon and
subject to the Texn~ and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trastees
authorizes and permits the following:
Wetland Permit to construct a single-family dwelling, deck, driveway, and
sanitary system with the condition that the dwelling and deck be on pilings, installation
of gutters and drywells to contain roof runoff, no fill except for the sanitary system, no
additional and/or nor further expansion to dwelling will be permitted, a pervious
driveway, and a line of staked hay bales to be installed prior to construction, and as
depicted on the survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin IH, last revised July 12, 2007,
and received on August 20, 2007.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed,
and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date.
SURVEY OF PROPERTY
MATTITUCK
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
~ / ...... ./- _._
KRAUS ROAD
CROSS-SECTION OF PROPOSED COHC, RETAINING WALL FOR
I
Nathan Taft Corwin III
Land Surveyor
Board of Trustees 54
Was there anybody else in the audience who wants to comment on
this application?
(No response.)
We had asked for dudng construction of it for hay bales to be
placed between the pavilion and the waterway. And we have down
here there is an opportunity for plantings to be done between the
pavilion and what is listed here as the bluestone walkway. What is
planned dght now in that area between, I believe there is a
six-foot area there; were there any plans that the applicant had as
far as plantings between that area between the pavilion and
walkway?.
MR. CIBULSKI: The plantings that were planned would be on the other
side all the way around to the flagpole with all the native species
because basically you have the walkway and a very short buffer area
and then have the bulkhead. So any plantings there might tend to
get a little bit messy with debris and anything else. It would be
a lot cleaner this way, it would be maintained a lot better since
there is an existing walkway. This is the way we thought we would
present it, with sufficient plantings and everything on center
according to the DEC suggestion.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: And that bluestone walkway would create a non-turf
buffer that is already there.
MR. CIBULSKI: Yes, it will.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Are there any other comments from the Board on this
application?
TRUSTEE KING: I went out and looked at it initially when we all
went out. I didnl have a problem with it.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: If there are no other comments I would like to make
a motion to close the public hearing.
TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Second.
TRUSTEE KING: All in favor?
(ALL AYES.)
TRUSTEE BERGEN: I would like to make a motion to approve the
application of Alpha Consulting on behalf of the Brewer Yacht Yard
at Greenport as indicated with the inclusion of leaders and gutters
to address the road runoff into the drywell as depicted on the
plans. And the inclusion of hay bales during construction between
the pavilion and waterway, the bulkhead.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Second.
TRUSTEE KING: All in favor?
(ALL AYES.)
MR. CIBULSKI: Thank you.
TRUSTEE KING: Number 12, Suffolk Environmental Consulting on behalf
of DAVID SHAMOON requests a Wetland Permit to construct a
single-family dwelling, deck, driveway and sanitary system.
Board of Trustees
55 May 16, 2007
Located: 2404 Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck.
Is there anyone here to speak on this application?
MR. BARRON: Sean Barron, Suffolk Environmental Consulting for
applicant. Mr. and Mrs. David Shamoon are also here tonight.
If I could, Bruce asked me to give you a copy of the DEC
permit for this. I'm not sure if you have that in the file. It's
a title wetland permit. It's for a larger, actually house, garage,
swimming pool, deck. It's tidal wetlands as the state doesn't
regulate any freshwater wetlands on this property. I have the
original copy but-
TRUSTEE KING: I think a lot of concerns with the Board is this one
lower area where this deck was proposed. This was one of our
concerns.
MR. BARRON: I'm coming into this late in the game. As I said
before, Bruce had some other important stuff to deal with. Where
exactly was this left off with you guys?
TRUSTEE KING: We talked about reducing, shifting the house a little
bit to get it further away from the wetlands. We talked about
downsizing the size of the house.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: He was going to try to have plans for us tonight
to look at showing what we discussed in the field, which was to
downsize it and move it further back.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: The question was, there was a comer of the house
as well as the deck which was into a depressed area where I know
that there has been some question as to whether or not that is
wetland area or not. But what we wanted to see was the house
either shifted or moved so the corner of that house was definitely
out of that -- I'll call it simplification purposes - a depressed
area.
MR. BARRON: I mean, we are dealing with, unfortunately, a
problematic lot that, as you know, it's obviously filled land.
There may have been a wetland there at some point. Somebody did a
bad job filling it in the '60s apparently, when they were probably
dredging the marina or the channels out there and we are left with,
unfortunately, what remains; which is some upland and something
else, I guess. I have been out to the property several times.
MR. SHAMOON: I'm David Shamoon. i'm the owner. My daughter is
getting married. I promise her this land. And we have been
two-and-a-half years. We spent so many surveyors, so many times,
and so many times we have appeared here, the Suffolk Environmental
was here, and we did -- whatever you want us to do, we'll do. But
it's two-and-a-half years. I mean.
TRUSTEE KING: You have to understand this is a very, it's really a
sensitive piece of property and we just trying to do our best here
MR. SHAMOON: I understand. He didn't tell me.
TRUSTEE KING: Of course it's inconsistent with LWRP. The proposed
Board of Trustees
56 May16,2007
distance to the new residence from the freshwater water wetland
boundary is 20 feet. Proposed distance from the deck to the
wetland is 15 feet. The proposed distance to the new residence from
the tidal wetland is 60 feet. Everything requires a minimum setback
of 100 feet. The proposed residence is in an AE flood zone
elevation. Please require the applicant amend the application to
meet the above policy to the greatest extent possible.
Those are the comments from the LWRP coordinator.
The CAC found a discrepancy with the flagging of the proposed
location of the structures compared to what was being proposed on
the plans. The flags appeared to be too close to the wetlands.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: That was the old flags were still there. That's
what confused us. That's what postponed it another month; because
the old flags were never taken out. Old stakes.
Since we didn't get the new plans showing what we discussed in the
field, I think we should table this until we get the new plans. We
want to see if it works. So we need to see that.
MR. BARRON: I have some revised plans that Bruce had me work on
that we were a little reticent to bring forward. Mr. Shamoon is
not happy with it. If you look at the information on the survey, I
put a copy of the site plan. It's not that good. You notice
ground water elevation is 5.1 feet. The survey shows some
topographic areas that are five feet and below, actually.
Presumably when the ground water is at five feet, that's where a
wet spot is going to be. This proposal shrinks the house back an
awful lot.
It's a dwelling with a footprint of 1,210 square feet, plus or
minus; 525 square foot deck; then the area for the sanitary system
which of course is going to be contained with a retaining wall
system.
Everything you notice is behind the six foot contour which is
why I mention the groundwater elevation of 5.1. Presumably this
brings it all out of that wet area. And actualiy, a little bit of
graphics, and I have to find my aerials.
TRUSTEE KING; Any plans for any fill being brought in?
MR. BARRON: No, with the exception for the sanitary system where
they may need - the wall is going to be about two feet above
grade. This shows 10.6 top of well elevation in an area about
eight or nine feet above sea level. So there will be fill brought
in for the sanitary system. The structure is proposed on pilings as
well as the decks, so we don~ need any fill for the structures
themselves.
I made a graphical rendering showing the subject property with
the proposed improvements on the revised site plan we are looking
at. The property with respect to most of the other improved
properties, it's an acre, which is bigger than most of the stuff
Board of Trustees
57 May 16, 2007
that is around there, and the proposed improvements are in general
smaller than what is around there, too. There is actually a
closeup of the two foot. You guys know the area, it's obviously
highly developed residentially, there is even a giant marina right
across the way.
TRUSTEE KING: Originally that was all wetlands. I have been there
from the '60s. This was all wetlands and then what happened is
someone did the dredging and then it was all fill.
MR. BARRON: Right, and somebody filled it in.
The DEC regulates the tidal wetland --
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: This was wetland here.
MR. BARRON: That was before anybody thought to regulate that stuff.
TRUSTEE KING: That was all done in the '60s, before you were born.
MR. BARRON: It was subdivided in the late '70's, eady '80s, that
was approved by the town and planning board, which adds another
wrench to the whole problem what to do with the land. I'm sure
it's been assessed and taxed as a buildable property as well and
Mr. Shamoon is looking to get some sort of improvement for his
daughter.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: So this new set of plans shows proposed dwelling
footprint of approximately 1,210.
TRUSTEE KING: 850 is the minimum in Southold Town. It's well above
the minimum size.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: This drawing shows what we asked for.
TRUSTEE KING: Is this a two-story home?
MR. BARRON: It would be two stories. Figure 800 or so square feet
on the second floor. Total of about two grand, gross floor area.
TRUSTEE KING: I don't think we could do a lot more with it.
MR. BARRON: It's a difficult lot. If it was a pristine, untouched
wetland, it might be, it would certainly be a different story.
TRUSTEE KING: There tidal wetland boundary as per Southold Town
Trustees, what does this line indicate closest to the house here,
with two little "X's," what is that?
MR. BARRON: That's apparently where the flags were. That's just a
tracing of what was on the previous survey which is shown basically
two arcs of wetland flags by the town. I have it on the Ingegno
survey last revised March 5, 2007. That's when they set to lay it
out for you guys to inspect. But presumably somebody from the
trustees flagged it. I don't know.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Maybe from all the discussions.
TRUSTEE KING: I think it was more or less from all our discussions.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I think Bruce just marked it from what we said.
TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I think this addresses more, most of our concerns.
TRUSTEE KING: We need to see drywolls for roof runoff shown on the
survey.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: We need a better survey.
Board o f Trustees
58 May 16, 2007
TRUSTEE KING: I don't think we could do much moro.
MR. BARRON: Also, incidentally, it complies with the zoning
setbacks.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: We would just need to see the gutters, leaders,
drywells, all that stuff.
MR. BARRON: Okay.
TRUSTEE KING: Was there a swimming pool proposed?
MR. BARRON: No.
MR. SHAMOON: I would like to have a swimming pool.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: We could say no further expansion on this.
TRUSTEE KING: Any other comments from anybody else in the audience
on this application?
(No response.)
I'll make a motion to close the headng.
TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Second.
TRUSTEE KING: All in favor?
(ALL AYES.)
TRUSTEE KING: Okay, we have been at this a long time. I think the
new drawings reflect what we discussed in the field as far as
trying to downsize this. We'll do what we can do to mitigate
everything. I don't think you can do anymore. I don1 think the
Board can do much more with this. Based on these new drawings I
would like to make a motion to approve the application.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: One comment. I think with the changes that have
been made here, that would mitigate the LWRP inconsistency, with
the inclusion of the gutters, hay bales during construction also.
TRUSTEE KING: We've maximized all the setbacks we could get. We've
downsized the house. We'll have gutters to drywells for roof
runoff. The septic system is out of our jurisdiction.
I would make a motion to approve as submitted with the
stipulation there would be no further additions to this structure
in the future. No additions.
TRUSTEE BERGEN: As per the plan dated May 16, 2007.
TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Do you want to see new plans showing -
TRUSTEE KING: Yes, a revised plans showing gutters and leaders and
drywells for roof runoff. It's a pervious driveway. We need a set
of hay bales on the -- ten feet beyond the six foot contour. That
will give them enough room to work around the house. Anything
else?
(No response.)
No fill to be brought in, with the exception of the sanitary
system. No fill to be brought in on the rest of the property. Do
I have a second?
TRUSTEE BERGEN: Second.
TRUSTEE KING: All in favor?.
(ALL AYES.)
Board of Trustees
60
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I'll make a motion to table the
application.
TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Second.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor?. ALL AYES
12. Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on
behalf of DAVID SHAMOON requests a Wetland Permit to
construct a 36' by 60' single-family dwelling with 12' by
34' wood deck attached to the east side, install a 20' by
40' pool to the north of the proposed dwelling, construct a
30' by 24' garage, and install a sanitary system with a
retaining wall. Located: 2404 Camp Mineola Road Extension,
Mattituck. SCTM#122-9-7.20
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Before we start this, there's no LWRP
review on file. We can't make a decision on this
tonight. We can't act on this. We don't have the LWRP
form. We'll take some brief comments from the public.
We'll reopen it next month at the same time.
MR. ANDERSON: I was made aware that there's a Iow spot that
water collects. I'm going to take a look, maybe even
delineate it on a survey and come back with something for
you at the next meeting. Other than that, we have two
adjacent neighbors that are here. I'd just a soon hear what
they have to say, and we'll see you next year on this.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Any comment?
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Jeff?
MR. STRONG: I'm Jeff Strong, president of Strong's Marine.
I don't know if you want me to read through, I gave you a
copy of what it is. In short, my property is directly
adjacent to the proposed application. And my primary
concern is that the way that the house and pool are
suggested to be situated on here, it puts the pool only 15
feet from my property line. And the 15 feet is one aspect
of it, there's no drawing of trees or anything on here
which, unfortunately, I did not make mention in my letter,
but there's a whole row of birch trees that's probably
somewhere in the 30 to 40 foot range that acts as a good
buffer right now between residential property and my
commercial property, and there's no mention of that at all.
So I can only presume that they're planning on removing
those trees, which would leave no buffer at all, which I'd
hate like heck to be here a couple years from now having
this house here and then they tell me, you know, the
commercial property that's been there for a very long pedod
of time is a nuisance to them.
The other concern I have is the elevation. They're
Board of Trustees 61
December 21, 2005
proposing to raise the elevation within that 15 foot border
of the pool to my property almost four feet, and the grade
of that will go from the pool towards my property. And
they're suggesting to mitigate that by putting in a 75 foot
concrete wall, and the concern I have about that is twofold.
One is the 70 foot wall at the end of either one of those
walls, the grade is still going to be fairiy significantly
pitched toward my property, so the water's going to work its
way around that wall onto that, and then potentially into
the creek. Secondarily, if you will look on that plan that
they have, the way the wall is designed, the grade would be
approximately three foot above my finished grade, right at
the road line and the top of their finish grade would be
right at the very top of that wall, meaning that water
again, would have no choice but to spill right over top of
that. So that didn't seem like a groat situation.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thanks.
TRUSTEE POLiWODA: I wouldn't worry about the pool too
much.
MR. STRONG: l'm not worded about the pool, I'm worried
about all the ground adjacent to the pool.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It's always been our policy in the code
that they have to contain their own runoff. So this plan
would have to be to-tooled to accommodate that.
MR. STRONG: Yeah. Because right now the way the whole
grade is not towards their drains it's away from their
drains, away from the pool and toward my property.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: As far as the concrete unsightly, maybe
they can put a four foot lattice up against it.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I just want to explain something to Peggy.
We walked out hero to where the septic was staked, we walked
out hero to where the garage and pool is proposed. There's
a drop off, I don't know if we have a picture of it, but
there's a real drop off about two and a half feet down into
that aroa. We looked at that whether that was a wetland or
not, yet to be determined, however it certainly is once an
artifact of an aroa that hadn't been filled. We thought it
was about two and a half foot of drop off, which would have
put it into groundwater, if you look at the test
hole --
MR. ANDERSON: What I think you saw was the land that was
filled but not smoothed out. I will tell you this, what we
want to do here is identify -- nothing else but runoff
control because that seems to be Mr. Strong's -- just retool
it.
MR. STRONG: You're referring to the area around
6 ~
Board of Trastees 62
December 21, 2005
Mr. Tufano's property.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: No. When we walked in here, as you walk
towards your parking lot, the area drops off, and I tded to
find it on the survey because it really drops off steeply
because that's why the garage and pool are in that lower
area, it shows two and a half feet to water at the test
hole, you're going down two and a half feet of water, it's
almost groundwater. Then our concern was maybe the house
should be built on pilings, so you wouldn't have to bring in
any fill.
MR. STRONG: Also indicated in my letter was maybe because
of setbacks, could the whole thing not be situated a little
more central to the lot. I think we can do that.
MR. ANDERSON: I think we can retool it to satisfy any
concerns you might have.
MR. TUFANO: Let's get this straight, they put him through
the dnger I want this house built. It's a legal building
lot. William Tufano, 2482 Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck,
mailing address, P.O. Box 1744 in Mattituck.
My property is next to the proposed building
site. I want to go on record that I have no objection to
the proposed house that is planned quote, "as is," with one
restriction that if any deviation from this plan here should
be applied for, then I rescind that statement that I want
the house built there. We had a very sad situation with
another incident of which I don't want to take the time
here.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you.
MR. TUFANO: But I find the way this is there's no objection
on my part, except I just noticed here that in the lower
left-hand corner, they're applying for a well. If they go
and put that well there, and it's not going to be needed,
there's Suffolk County Water available on the road, if he
goes and puts that well there and when I get ready to build
a house for my children on my lot, it may require me to move
my septic system if we have to put it in that area.
Secondly, I don't know where he's going to get good water
over there.
MR. ANDERSON: If you're saying there's public water
available down there?
MR. TUFANO: Yes.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: That will be a requirement. The Health
Department will require them to hook up to public water if
it's available.
MR. TUFANO: It's available, okay.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you, I would just advise you to stay
Board' of Trustees 63 December 21, 2005
in touch with the Board, certainly come to the next month's
Board meeting. You should stay in touch with the
application to make sure there aren't any changes that you
would find objectionable.
MR. TUFANO: The only thing I don't appreciate here with
this thing, you people designate to the applicant to hire an
environmentalist to designate wetlands and conveniently they
go and blame the wetlands on my property but not theire. So
I want to be on record.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The applicant hires the wetland
designation.
MR. TUFANO: But you force the applicant to hire the
environmentalist.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKh That's true, someone has to
designate.
MR. TUFANO: And the DEC wants no part of these two
lots. They have a 400 foot jurisdiction, but they don't
want no part in designating. That's your responsibility.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: That's okay. That's home rule. That's
okay. I'll make a motion to table the application.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor?. ALL AYES
13. Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on
behalf of DARREN PFENNIG requests a Wetland Permit to
construct a 4' by 100' bluff stairway, including three 4' by
4' platforms within the northern section of the subject
property. Located: Oregon Road, Cutchogue. SCTM#72-2-2.3
TRUSTEE KRUPSKi: Is there anyone here who would like to
speak on behalf of this application?
MR. LOHN: William Lohn, Suffolk Environmental Consulting on
behalf of William Pfennig, who is also here with us this
evening.
As you know, this proposal is to construct a bluff
stairway within the northern section of subject parcel in
order to access the shoreline. Stairway is going to measure
4' by 100', 125 foot actual. The stairway will include
three platforms measuring 4' by 4' and will be supported by
32 posts measuring 6 by 6. Pretty standard application. We
feel it speaks for itself and I'm here to answer any
questions.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKh Thank you.
TRUSTEE DICKERSON: It's consistent with LWRP.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKh CAC recommended disapproval because the
bluff is a steep angle and the bluff will not support stairs
at this time. The CAC recommends a five year planting plan
~m ....... ,~, _. ~ ................. · ................. ~T~CE ~ CDUNTY OF SUFFOL~ ....... S~IHOLD
m
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY 11971
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To:
Jill Doherty, President
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner
LWRP Coordinator
Date: March 21,2011
Re:
Proposed Wetland Permit for PAUL PAWLOWSKI
SCTM#1000-122-9-7.20
PAUL PAWLOWSKI requests an Administrative Permit to install a 6' fence surrounding the
rear yard. Located: 2404 Camp Mineola Rd., Mattituck. SCTM#122-9-7.20
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the
Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy
Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment
Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my
recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy
Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP.
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem
6.4. Protect vulnerable fish, wildlife, and plant species, and rare ecological
communities.
The plans fail to identify the type of fence, method of construction within the buffer and
mitigation to enable the mi.qration of wildlife (reptiles1 amphibians) between habitats.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in
preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney
Jill M. Doherty, President
James F. King, Vice-President
Dave Bergen
Bob Ghosio, Jr.
John Bredemeyer
Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd.
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (63 I) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Office Use Only
Coastal Erosion Permit Application
Wetland Permit Application ~
~Amendment/Trans fqr/E~tensio~
~q Received Application:
31fi'ltl
· Fee:$ <'7~
Y,I Received .~.x ..
..~2ompleted Application '~] ~ ~ / / I
Incomplete
SEQRA Classification:
Type I Type II Unlisted
Coordination:(date sent)
~6WRP Consistency Assessment Form ..~,Jt~]
CAC Referral Sent:
Date of Inspection:
Receipt of CAC Report:
__Lead Agency Determination:
Technical Review:
~Public Hearing Held:~.~.l~
Resolution:
Name of Applicant /~ [
Administrative Permit
Address
Phone Number:( ) &~/ - ~/c/.5---Y-~ Z'~?
Suffolk County Tax Map Number:
Property Location: r~Y3/vT/ ~¢~ ,~: ;Ur'd~/;~
(provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location)
(If applicable)
Address:
rd of Trustees Applicatio0
Intended use of property:
Covenants and Restrictions:
If "Yes", please provide copy.
GENERAL DATA
Land Area (in square feet): V ~/ ~' / '~ --~
Area Zoning: ~ 4. w.~ z3.~52
Previous use of property:
Yes /No
Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals __
If "Yes", please provide copy of decision.
Prior permits/approvals for site improvements:
Agency Date
Yes Y No
__ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements.
Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency?
~/No Yes
If yes, provide explanation:
Project Description (use attachments if necessary):
of Trustees Applicati¢
WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA
Purpose of the proposed operations:
Area of wetlands on lot:
-7~ '~ square feet
Percent coverage of lot: . I~ %
Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland
edge of wetlands: [~ feet
Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland
edge of wetlands: feet ~ ~
Does the project involve excavation or filling? ~"'~ No Yes
If yes, how much material will be excavated?
How much material will be filled? ' (~
cubic yards
cubic yards
Depth of which material will be removed or deposited:
Proposed slope throughout the area of operations:
feet
Manner in which material will be removed or deposited:
Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by
mason of Sudl~p~opos~d op~ations (Use ~t~a~hmen~s if ~ppropri~t~i -
PROJECT iD NUMBER
PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION
1 APPLICANT / SPONSOR
617.20
APPENDIX C
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor)
2~ PROJECT NAME
SEQR
3.PROJECT LOCATION: ~,0~./L'T-J'~/]~ -r-~-~-v ~
PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections. Prominent landmarks etc -or provide mae
IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion ,,~fication / alteration
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
Initially acres Ultimately acres
8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS?
[Z]']Yes [] No If no, describe briefly:
9 W AT iS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose asmanyasapply.)
[~RAesidential []]]industrial ~Commercia, ~Agriculture []Park/Forest/OpenSpace []O,her (describe)
IO.'DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY (Federal State or Local)
~i~7]Yes I~]No if yes, list agency name and permit / approval:
11. Uu~:~5 ANY A~P'ic(.;I (JP iht AL;lION HAVE:'A ~URRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? i~Yes [~]Ho- If yes, list agency name and permit / approval:
12. AS A RESr.~,I~T~OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
~Yes ~ No
CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Ifth~ action i$ a ¢o~tal Ama, and you am a ~tat~ a~*ncy,
¢ompl~t~ th* Coastal ~e~m~nt Form bo[oro pro¢*oding with this assossmont
Town of Southold
Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM
PROPEI~[Y ~.OCATIOH: S.C.T.M. #: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A
STORM-WATER, GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Dte~lct Section BZOCk Lot CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEff YORK.
SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUc'rlON ITI~VI # / WORKASSESSMEtqT ] Yes No
a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels?
Total Area of all Parcels Iocatad withini~l",uO~ I ''~ I Wit/this Project Retain All Storm*Water Run-Off
(Include
Generated by a Two (2') Inch Rainfall on Site?
the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (This item will include all mn-off created by s~e
b. What is the Total Area of Land Cleadng (S.F. / AC,~) clearing and/or construction activities as well as all --
and/or Ground Oistu~oance for the proposed ~*-I~J ~ Site Improvements and the permanent creation of
construction activity?'- impervious surfaces.)
(s.F., ~.,) 2 Does the Site Plan end/or Survey Show All Proposed
PROVIDE BRIEIZ PROJECT DESGRIPTION (P~a' ~ P~ "~ Drainage Structures Indicating Size & Location? This ~ ['~]
Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and
~/1 { '~/ · X · /~/) ~t ~' / i ~"~ Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow.
.... v- ~ ' '--'" 3 DoestheSitePlanandlorSurveydescdbetheerosfon
.~)/, t ~'~-~/--~4.~ (.~,~ and sediment controlpracticesthatwillbe used to
~ - -~ -/ control site erosion and storm water discharges. This
item must be maintained throughout the Entire
Construction Pedod.
4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling, Grading or
Excavation where there is a change to the Natural
Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards
of Matedal within any Parcel?
5 Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities
Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five ThousandL~
(5,000 S.F.) Square Feet of Ground Surface?
6 Is them a Natural Water Course Running through the
Site? Is this Project within lhe Trustees jurisdiction
General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred (100') feet of a Wetland or
which Exceed Fifteen (15) feet of Vertical Rise to
including Construc~on activiUes involvir~j so~ disturbances of less than o~e (1) acre where One Hundred (100') of Horizontal Distsnce9
SwPPP'$ Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways, Parking Ames or other Impervious
U
2. The SWPPP shall d~scHbe the erosion and sediment contm~ practices end where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material,
constructed to reduce the poi~utsnts in storm water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder
STATE OF NEW YORK, ~.~, , ~C--n i [:
That I,. ............................. :.k.........~ .................. L¥....:....~2~..~--mg duly sworn deposes and says that he/s ~e s the app cant for Permit,
Owner and/or representative of the Ovaier or Owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to
make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are hue to the best of his knowledge and belief; and
hat the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith.
Sworn to befo$,e me this;
FORM - 06/10
No. 0 I'BE'~)~ §3 ;I ~-
Qualified in Suffo k Coun y..^,
Commission Expires Sept. 29, o~U J J
of Trustees Applicat~n
County of Suffolk
State of New York
DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE
TRUE TO THE BEST OF I-IlS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK
WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY
BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT
AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES
HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARIS1NG
UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS
APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR
REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE
PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION.
SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
G/.~Si~ture ~
(~r) DAYOF~(~ ,20 //
PENNY BEDELL
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01BE6099317
. ~ atified in Suffoik Co_u_nty -~,~ ~.
APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE
TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM
The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics nrohibits conflicts of interest on the hart of town officers and emolovees. The nuruose of
~lli~ form is to omvidc information which can alert the town of oossible conflicts of intem~t and allow it to take whatever action is
neceasarv to avoid same.
YOUR NAME: '~t"k L~ (~_ ~.- ~ t.._~,~<~,.~ ,~,,~(
(Last uame. first name,~niddle initial, tmless you are applying in the name of
someone else or other entity, such as a cempany. If so. indicate, the other
person's or company's name.)
NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.)
Tax grievance Building
Variance Trustee
Change of Zone Coastal Erosion
Approval of plat Mooting
Exemption from plat or official map Planning
Other
(If"Other", name the activity.)
Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee
of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest'~ means a business,
including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation
in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%~)e'~hares.
YES NO
If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated.
Name of person employed by the Town of Southold
Title or position of that person
Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicanffagent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check
the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided.
The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply):
A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant
(when the applicant is a corporation);
___B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the
applicant is not a corporation);
___C) an officer, director, partnei~, or employee of the applicant; or
D) the actual applicant..
DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP
Form TS 1
ard of Trustees Applicat~
AUTHORIZATION
(where the applicant is not the owner)
residing ~ailing
' (print' owner 6f pr~erty) at ,/~ ~O~address)-7~ %
do hereby authorize
(Agent)
to app];/ for permit(s) from the
Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf.
( Owner ' s signature)
/
/
/
8
Town of Southold
LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM
A. INSTRUCTIONS
All applicants for pemaJts* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for
proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This
assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in
making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits
and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.
Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt
minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local
Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant
beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (wkich includes all of Southold Town).
If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will
affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency
review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail~ listing both supporting and non-
suooortin~ facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and
conditions, it shall not be undertaken.
A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold ' s
website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all
local libraries and the Town Clerk's office.
B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION
The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response):
Tow. Boar P,anningBuarO B il ing e,t.<
Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response):
(a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital
construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction)
(b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy)
(c) Permit, approval, license, certification:
Nature and extent of action:
Location ofaction:
Site acreage: [
Presentland use:
Present zoning classification:
If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following
(a) Name of applicant:
(b) Mailing address:
information shall be provided:
(c) Telephone number: Area Code ( )
(d) Application number, if any:
Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency?
Yes [--] No ~"/Ifyes, which state or federal agency?
C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or
not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy.
Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion.
DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southoid that enhances community character,
preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and
minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
~-~es [--] No [] Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
~ Yes ~-3 No'Not Applicable
/
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southoid. Sce
LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria
Yes NoApplicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LwRP
Section III - Policies Pa~ges 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria
~ Yes ~ No[7~t_2 Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III
-Policies Pages 16 throng[21 for evaluation criteria
~] Yes [--] No17~t~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including
Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22
through 32 for evaluation criteria.
Yes No Not Apl~ble
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies
Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria.
~ Yes ~ No ~t Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous
substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria.
~'~ Yes ~ No ~ot Applicable
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public
resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation
criteria.
~ Yes~ N~Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
WORKING COAST POLICIE~
Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in
suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria.
Yes No L,~ot Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconie
Estuary and Town wate/ys. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria.
~-~1 I Yes ~-~ No~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages
62 through 65 for evaluation criteria.
~-~ Yes ~ No ~Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP
Section III - Policies 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
[--~ Yes ~ No~-~l/] Not Apphcable--
KRAUS ROAD
SURVEY OF PROPERTY
SITUATE
MATTITUCK
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
S.C. TAX No. 1000-122-09-7.20
SCALE 1 "=30'
JULY 24, 2004
AREA = 40,817 sq. fl. 0,937 ac.
NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM
SEPTIC SYSTEM TIE MEASUREMENTS
~ HOUSE HOUSE
CORNER [] CORNER E~
SEPTIC TANK
COVER 1 70' 57'
LEACHING POOL
COVER 2 83' 48'
LEACHING POOL
COVER 3 79' 42'
LEACHING POOL
COVER A 77' 38'
LEACHING POOL
COVER 5 85' 46'
LEACHING POOL
COVER S 92' 56'
LEACHING POOL
COVER 7 83' 50'
FLAG
LOT COVERAGE DATA
(OVER URLAND ADJACENT AREA 40,045 sq
DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE
EXISTING HOUSE 1,258 sq. ff. 3.1%
EXISTING DECK 561 sq. ff. 1.¢%
TOTAL EXISTING 1,799 s9. ff. 4.5%
PROPOSED GARAGE 360 sq. ff. O.9%
PROPOSED POOL 512 sq. fl. 1.3%
TOTAL EXIST. & PROPO. 2,671 s9. ff. 6.7%
NOTE: AREA OF WETLANDS = 752 sq. ff.
UPLAND ADJACENT AREA = A0.055 sq. fi.
S 84°50,50" W
150.00'
TEST HOLE DATA
(TEST HOLE DUG BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE ON MAY 11, 2005 AT 12'OOpm)
23'
o NN
UNAUTHORIZED ALTr' TIOM OR ADDITION
TO THIS SURVEy IS ~ VIOLATION OF
THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHTS OF WAY
AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF
ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED,
Nathan Taft Corwin III
Land Surveyor
Successor To: Stanley J Isaksen, Jr, LS, Joseph A Ingegno LS,
PHONE (651)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727
30--126~