HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-9.-3-1 OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southald, NY 11971
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southald, NY 11971
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
To:
Jim King, President
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner
LWRP Coordinator
Date: February 15, 2013
Re:
Proposed Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit for HAY HARBOR CLUB
SCTM#1000-9-3-1
J.M.O. Environmental Consulting Services on behalf of HAY HARBOR CLUB requests a Wetland
Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to reconstruct and realign a 5'x105' dock which was destroyed by
Hurricane Sandy by constructing a 5'x30' elevated timber walk; a 4'x100' timber walk on grade and to
remove and dispose of existing wood walk and to connect proposed walk to existing walk as required.
Located: 990 Fox Avenue, Fishers island. SCTM# 9-3-1
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of
Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards.
Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this
department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposal is
INCONSISTENT with LWRP Policies 4.1 (below) and therefore, INCONSISTENT with the LWRP.
4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards.
The fo/lowing management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from
flooding and erosion hazards are suggested:
Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from
flooding and erosion hazards.
1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas.
Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal
hazard areas as practical.
a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except
as specifically a/lowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8.
Although the action is a water dependent use, the location of the proposed deck is within the Coastal
Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA) and will be constructed in the nearshore area and on the beach. All
development is prohibited in the nearshore area pursuant to § 111-11. and beach pursuant § 111-12
unless specifically provided for by Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS. Pursuant to §
'111-6, allowable activities in these areas may include open timber piles or other similar open
work supports with a top surface area of less than 200 square feet which are removed in the fall
of each year. Therefore, the dock, as proposed, is prohibited in the nearshore area and on the beach
pursuant to Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS.
§ "1tt-6. Definitions.
UNREGULATED ACTIVITY -- Excepted activities which are not regulated by this chapter include but
are not limited to elevated walkways or stairways constructed solely for pedestrian use and built by an
individual property owner for the limited purposes of providing noncommercial access to the beach;
docks, piers, wharves or structures built on floats, columns, open timber piles or other similar open
work supports with a top surface area of less than 200 square feet or which are removed in the
fall of each year; normal beach grooming or cleanup; maintenance of structures when normal and
customary and/or in compliance with an approved maintenance program; planting vegetation and sand
fencing so as to stabilize or entrap sand in primary dune and secondary dune areas in order to maintain
or increase the height and width of dunes; routine agricultural operations, including cultivation or
harvesting; and the implementation of practices recommended in a soil and water conservation plan as
defined in § 3, Subsection (12), of the Soil and Water Conservation Districts Law; provided, however,
that agricultural operations and implementation of practices will not be construed to include any activity
that involves the construction or placement of a structure.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its
written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney
Town of Southold
All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for
proposed actions that am subj~t to the Town of Southold waterfront Consistency Review Law. This
assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in
making a detemfinafion of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits
and other ministerlal permtts not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.
.;Before answe~n~ the questions in Section C, the p~par~r of this form. should review the exempt
· nlnor action list, policies and explanations of~mch policy contain~xl in the Town of Southold Local
Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposal a~don will be eval,_,~i, as to it~ significant
b~a~¢ial and adver~ eff~s u~n ~e ~astal area (which iaeludes all of Sou~hold Town).
3: If any question ia Selden C on this form is answe~d "yes" or "no", thea the proposed action will
affect the aehieveraent of the LWRP policy stands,ds and conditions eonmin~l in the consistency
t~,,i~w law. Thus~ each answ~ mu~ be explaia~nl in d~l, lisflag bo~ supporting and non-
su~ortin~, fac~ ffan action cannot be certified as consisteat wilh the LWRP policy standards and
conditions, it shall not be under, ken.
A copy of the LWRP is available' in the following plac~ · ,~.li.~*~*h. TO~-~_
local libraries and the Town Clerk s o~iee. '~,ltI~l
D SCaU'nONOr srr nm) tmoms mAc-no,n,/Ual dall 2 9 z01a
The Applieation has bee~ submitted to, check appropriate response):
1. Cat~:gy of Town of Southold ag~f~n (dae~k appro~'~n~):
Action undedaken dLn:ctly by Town agency (e.g. capital
construction, plan~in~ a~ivlty, ageacy regn,!afion, land transaction)
.Co) Fin~-oial assistance (~.g. gram, loan, subsidy) ~ ~ 1.
(c) Permit, approval, license,,x~flc~ion:'
Nature aud extent of action: I / ~
Applicant proposes to r~construct~,d._ realign a 5'x105'
by Storm Sandy by constru6tin~ a 5'~30' e~tevated walk,
dock
a 4'x100'
timber walk on grade and to remove and dispose of existin~ wood
walk and to connect proposed walk to existing as required
990 Fox Avenue,
Location of acfiom
9.7
S~ amigo:
Club
Present zonin~ cl~[ficatio~
Fishers Island
R-80
If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the followin4g
informafon sh~l be provided:
(a) Name of applicant: Hay Harbor Club
P.O. BOX 477
~) Msllln_o addr~:
Fishers Island, NY 06390-0477
(¢) Tel~pho~mnum~.AnmCo&( ) 631-788-7323
(~ Applicafi0~l mlmb~, ifsn~, unknown
Will the action be directly undemken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency?
Yes [] No [] If yes, which state or federal agency? N. Y. S. r). w.. C.
C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or
not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy.
Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion.
DEVELOPED CO~ST POLICY
Policy 1. FOster a pattern of development in the Town of So. uthold that enhances community character,
preservea open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, malo~ beneficial use of a coastal location, and
minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
~ Y~ [] No [] Not Applicable
The project does not involve i'development" and should have no
impact uDon open sDacev the Chara~p~ of ffh~ ~mmnni~y ~tC T~
Attach additional she~s if necessary
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resource~ of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section HI ~ Polici~ Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
[] C1 so 1-] ot*ppllca le
The project will have no impact on any histnrJ~ nr .
a~h~nlng~n~l ~:n"~gS. It is felt that tkc projcct
is consistent with th~ p~licy
At, ch additional sheets ifnece~ary
Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resourec~ throughout the Town of Southold. Sec
LV(RP Section HI - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria
~ Yes [] 'o ~'~ Not.Applicable
The Droie~ will nnh n~q~vely impa~ ~ny ~m~n~ ~,,~
impact the visual quality of the Town. It is felt that this
project is consistent with this policy
Attach additional she~ if n~e~
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
· policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP
Section Ill- Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria
[] Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable
The project involves the reconstruction of a storm damaged dock.
The proiect will not
properties, will not create any aes~h~ti~ impairm~nts~ th~r~
shall be no loss of habitat(marine or wet~ands) and there shall
be no loss of Public recreational resources. It is felt that
thim prnj~t i~ ~nnq(:fmnf
Attach additional sh~ts if necessary
Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI
- Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria
[] Yes [] No []Not Applicable
The oroiect will have no
potable water. It is felt that
this.policy
upnn fhm q,,mlify nr q,,~ntity of
this Droiect is consistent With
Attach ~ sheets ffnec~aazy
Policy 6. Protect and restore the' quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems ineinding
Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section ~I - Policies; Page~ 22
through 32 for evaluation criteria.
Yes No Not Applicable
The project shall have no negative impacts upon
quality or function of any wetlands, ecosystems or
of Sionifi~nt COastal Figb =n~ w~l~l~{e uabit~tm. It
is felt that th~s project iq ~n~=~n~ ~h ~h~
Polity 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Tuwn of Soathold. See LWRP Seetioa llI- Polieks
Pages 3.2 through 34 for evaluation criteria.
The project shall, have no impact upon air guality. It
poli.¢y
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of SouthoM from solM wnst~ omi haznrdom
sulmmces and wsstm. See LWRP Section !II- Policies; Pages 34 thFough 38 for evahafion crlteFh.
~-~ Yes [-'] No ~'] Not Appnctble
of properlv and no hazardon~ Snh~t~n~s or w~gtm~ ~r~
invg~ed with the proj.ect. It is felt that this DroJ~
is consistent with this po]~y
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public
resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation
criteria.
[] Y~--~ NO [] Not Applicable
The project will have no impact upon public access to
lands or the public resources of the Town. It is
felt that this proi~_ct
policy
Attach additio~l sl~-~s if necessary
COAST POLICIES
Policy 10. Pro~ec~ Southold's mr-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in
mdtable locations. See LWRP Section m- Polk;-k~; Pages 47 fltrough $6 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes [] No [--] Not App~enble
The project will have no impact upon Southold's
water-dependent uses or the siting of new
water-dependent uses in.suita,ble locations. I~ is
f~]~ ~h~ ~hi~ proj~_ct is consistent with ~his
policy
Attach additional ~ if ~
Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic
Estuary and Torsi waters. See L%¥RP Section l~ - Policies; Pages S7 through 62 for evaluatlan criteria.
[-~ Yes ['-] NO [--] Not Applicable '
The project will have no impacts upon the substainable
use of living marine resources. It is felt that this
Drofiect is ~Qnsistent with this policy
Atlaoh .cldltional sheets if neoessary
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages
62 through 65 for evaluation criteria.
The Dro~ect does not involve agricultural land. It is
felt that this. policy is not appicable to this prosect
Attach additional shoots if nocos,xary
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP
Section IH- policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable
The pro~ect does not involve the 'use of or the
development of energy or mineral resources. It
is felt that this policy is not applicable to this
PREPARED BY Glenn E~ Just TITLE agen~ DATE..LL2_~
ITE
1.) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR ~ F
ENGAGEMENT.
2.) IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION
OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY.
5.) ONLY COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MARKED W1TH THE LAND SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND AN ORIGINAL EMBOSSED
or INK SEAL ARE THE PRODUCT OF THE LAND SURVEYOR.
4.) COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY TRIANGULATION STATION
"PROS".
5.) SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TAX MAP 1000, SECTION 009, BLOCK 5, LOT 1.
6.) TOTAL AREA = +9.7 ACRES.
7.) BASE FOR LEVELS - MLLW
CMI '%
REVISIONS
I
PLAN OF PROPOSED DOCK REPLACEMENT
PREPARED FOR
HAY HARBOR CLUB
990 FOX AVENUE
FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK
CME Associates Engineering,
Land Surveying &
Architecture, PLLC
DATE: 0~/o2/~31 SCALE:AS .OTEOI SHEET: 1 OF 5 JOB I~2012854 [
--- 4. --- EXISTING CONTOUR
x 9.2 EXISRNG SPOT GRADE
ELEVATION
APPROXIMATE
OF TIDAL
HIGH WATER LII~IE
EXISTING FIXED
:~6' WIDE WOOD
DOCK TO REMAIN
MF.~ HIGH
APPROXIMATE APPARENT
LOW WATER UNE
EXIS~NG CONCRETE
FOUNDA~ON
ROCK SHORE
PROTEC~ON
APPROXIMATE LOCA~ON OF
±105 LF OF DESTROYED DOCK
30 15 0 50
GRAPHIC SCALE IN F,~:~.i
REVISIONS
I
i
I
/
!
I I I
PLAN OF PROPOSED DOCK REPLACEMENT
PREPARED FOR
HAY HARBOR CLUB
990 FOX AVENUE
FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK
~TE: m/o2/~31 sc~e~'=3o' J S.EZT:2 o~ 5
CME Associates Engineering,
Land Surveying &
C Architecture, PLLC
JOB ~2012854 I ~.~,.o~,..~,~.*.~.=rm.. ~
x 9,2
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT GRADE
ELEVATION
PIUNG TO BE SET
OF TIDAL
EXISTiNG FIXED
±6' WlDE WOOD
DOCK TO REMAIN
UF. AN HIGH
IOW WA'IER UNEEi.~V.~.O)'
EXISTiNG CONCRETE
FOUNDATiON
ELEVATED VKXX)
(a.L=V, V~S S~ S~mT 4)
ROCK SHORE
PROTEC'flON
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
+105 LF OF DESTROYED OOCK
PROPOSED 4' WDE X +100' ~
WOOD WALK
(a. ZV, W~S Sa[ s~r 4)
w(x3O WALK
30 15 0 30
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
REVISIONS
I I
PLAN OF PROPOSED OOCK REPLACEMENT
PREPARED FOR
HAY HARBOR CLUB
990 FOX AVENUE
FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK
/
/
'--\
EXISTING
WOOD WALK
DATE: 01/02/1.3I SCALE:l"-- 50' I SHEET:3 OF 5
i
I
I
,
PROPOSED DOCK
CME Associates E'nginecring,
Land Surveying &
Architecture, PLLC
JOB ~2012854 I ==~.m.,o¢..~.~.~.~c~o~
p~os~ P~ (6)
PROPOSED
/
~ 4' ~ X ~1~ ~l I EXISTING PILE
F~ ~ AT ~E / / ~ TO REMAIN
EXlSnNG h ], ~; [1 EXISTING WOOD DOCK
~OD WALK~ : h
TO REMAIN ~P~ UM~ ~~ ~ H ~ !~ ~]~ELEV.=~6,~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
........ ~.: .......... ~..--~ ....... ,7 ....... ~ :.. :[" ~: .. ~ "~
0+00 0+50 1+~ 1+50 1+75
~ 15 o 30
REViSiON S PROPOSED DOCK PRO~LE
I I I
P~N OF PROPOSED ~CK REP~CEMENT C~Ass~J~t~
PREPPED FOR
~90 FOX AVENUE HORZ.=I'=30' ~ ~a,~.~[aam~
~ISHERS IS~D, N~ YORK VERT.=I
DATE: 01/02/13] S~:AS .O~EDI ~EET:4 OF
PLAN VIEW-- WALK At"11.I S_/4" DECKIIdP-
NOT TO SCALE
4*' VJD~ WAlK ~tTH 5/4' DECKING
NOT TO SCALE
~lmI
WALK WITH 5/4' DEC~ING (FLFVATED~
NOT TO SCALE
REVISIONS
t I I
PLAN OF PROPOSED DOCK REPLACEMENT
PREPARED FOR
HAY HARBOR CLUB
990 FOX AVENUE
FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK
~A~ o~/o~/~I sc~:.~s [ st~:5 o~ 5
CME Associates Engineering,
Land Surveying &
Architcctm~, PLLC
,JOB ~2012854 I
--~ 4 --- EXJS'nNG CONTOUR
x 9.2 E~XISTING SPOT GRADE
ELEVATION
N~XIMATE UMITS
OF TIDAL
APPARENT HIGH WATB~ LIN_E_(.AI.I~_ _~
E~STING FI~
· 6' ~DE WO~
DO~ TO REMNN
M~ HI~
WA~
N~:~OXIIdATE APPARENT
LOW WA'I~R UNE
EXISTING CONCR£'I~
FOUNDATION ('PfP
ROCK SHORE
PROTECTION
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
· 105 LF OF DESTROYED DOCK
30 15 0 30
GRAPHIC SCALE IN
REVISIONS
I
PLAN OF PROPOSED DOCK REPLACEMENT
PREPARED FOR
HAY HARBOR CLUB
990 FOX AVENUE
FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK
,,\
I
1
I
/
/
/
I
(
il
dAN 2 9 2013
EXISTING
I
WOOD WALK
J I '~-~ uoard of Tr'~te~
EXISTING CONDITIONS
CME Associates Engineering,
Land Surveying
C Architecture, PLLC
JOB ~[2012854. I ~r=,~,.,-a.~,.~,,~.=a~.~.c'r~