HomeMy WebLinkAboutFritz, Peter & JoanMark Terry
Planning Department
Southold Town
Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
January23,2013
ECE VE
JAN 2 4 201
~l~rd of Tmste~
Dear Mr. Terry,
Thank you for taking the time to speak with me today in regards to Wetlands Permit
TM#71-1-8 (Fritz property N. Parish Dr.)
It is my understanding from our conversation that the reason that you found the
application consistent with the LWRP, is only because of the pre-existing permit
approved by the Trustees in 2011. In 2011, you found their permit application
INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Because the Trustees approved a variation of the 2011
permit, it now makes the project consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization
Plan? This makes the 2013permit consistent with the 2011 permit. It does not make the
project consistent with the LWRP.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I appreciate that your depadment is quite
busy.
Sincerely,
Maggie Merrill
700 N. Parish Dr.
Southold, NY 11971
Cc:
Town Trustees
Conservation Advisory Council
My name is loan Fritz. My husband, Peter and I have owned the proper 75~,AIl
North Parish Drive since 1998 when we purchased it from my mother, ho alongS0ut~01d Town
with my father owned it since 1958. My family has been paying taxes ~ ~ t|~s ~0arO 0JTrustc0S
property for close to 6 decades. Members of my family have been residents of
Southold town for almost nine decades. My father, maternal grandmother, great
aunts, great uncles, aunts and uncles are all buried here, as will my mother, my
husband and I, and our children.
We are before you tonight because of environmental and climatological changes that
began before members of my family took up permanent residence in Southold. My
husband is an insurance broker who over the years has specialized in insuring the
worldwide offshore oil and gas exploration and production operations of some of
the worlds largest and geographically diverse integrated oil companies. They
operate in some of the world's most environmentally sensitive areas. Governments
across the globe, the oil companies themselves and the insurance industry realize
that what 20 years ago was called the "hundred year storm" is now the norm.
Katrina and Rita devastated the Gulf of Mexico coast as well as the offshore energy
industry; recent storms across the North Sea and Europe have caused billions of
dollars of damage. As a result, governments, in order to protect the environment
and lives, are exercising stricter control and requiring more robust design of all
newly constructed offshore facilities. The insurance industry has responded by
either only insuring those facilities designed to today's standards or for those
underwriters willing to write older units in storm prone areas like the Gulf of
Mexico their premium has risen up to 2,000% making it unaffordable for smaller
companies.
You may ask what this has to do with our request for a full bulk heading? We say it
has everything to do with it.
Storms like Sandy have become the norm and we argue that communities in storm
prone areas need to be proactive in protecting the lives and property of their
citizens while not damaging the environment. My husband and I are not scientists
but it seems logical to us that when property is eroded the run off into the bays not
only damages property but also harms the environment and causes contamination.
If we look at our particular situation in 2011, while we had originally applied for full
bulk heading the Trustees and DEC approved the installation of approximately 50'
of bulk heading and 50' of rock revetment. As the Trustees saw, Sandy did no
structural damage to the bulk heading but a large portion of the rock revetment was
destroyed with substantial erosion going directly into Southold Bay. We would liken
the difference in the effectiveness of the bulk heading vs. the rock revetment to the
difference between the strength of an offshore platform designed in 1980 and one
designed today. While we are relieved we didn't suffer more damage and loss of
property from Sandy, we also feel that had we been allowed a full bulk heading in
2011we would not be standing in front of the Trustees today again asking them to
do what is right for both us as tax payers as well as the environment.
As we said earlier, the community has an obligation to protect the property of all its
citizens. We understand our neighbor has expressed a concern that by allowing us
to extend our bulk heading it could increase the potential for erosion to her
property from future storms. We take this concern seriously and have hired Mr.
Joseph Fischetti PE who is here with me tonight. He assures us the extension of the
bulk heading should not exacerbate any erosion to our neighbor's property from
future storms.
We thank you for the opportunity to come before you tonight and encourage you to
take the bold step of approving our plans which will best protect both our property
and the environment of the entire town of Southold and it's bays.
JAN 2 3 20k~
Jan. 15,2013
Southold Town Boa~ of Trustees
Southold Town Annex
Box1179
Southold NY 11971
Re: SCTM # 1000-71-1-8
Peter & Joan Fritz
755 North Parish Drive
82 foot new bulkhead
,ECEOVE
JAN I 5 2013
$outhold Town
Boar~ of
Dear Trustees,
In regards to the above referenced permit request, we would like you to know of
our concern as owners of the adjacent properties (Croasdale 695 North Parish
Drive, Merrill 700 North Parish Drive).
We would like to register our objection to the proposed 55 feet of new bulkhead
and 32 feet of new return bulkhead. Such a structure is against town code and
we believe would cause substantial erosion to our property. We would
respectfully like to ask the Fritz's to explore a less harmful alternative.
As property owners, we empathize with the Fritz's desire to stem the erosion to
their property, but do not want to see it happen at the expense of our property.
Margaret Merrill
700 North Parish
Margaret Merrill POA for
Margaret Croasdale
695 North Parish Drive
Peter Young, Chairman
Lauren Standish, Secretary
Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd.
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (631) 765-I 892
Fax (631) 765-6641
Conservation Advisory Council
Town of Southold
At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., January
16, 2013 the following recommendation was made:
Moved by Derek Bossen, seconded by Doug Hardy, it was
RESOLVED to NOT SUPPORT the Wetland Permit application of PETER & JOAN FRITZ
to remove rock revetment and extend bulkhead to protect waterfront.
Located: 755 North Parish Dr., Southold. SCTM#71-1-8
Inspected by: Derek Bossen, Peter Young
The CAC does Not Support the application and recommends leaving the rock revetment
in place and to enhance the rip-rap with native plantings, remove all irrigation, exterior
lighting, and non-native vegetation from the buffer, and to extend the buffer an additional
5'.
Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail
Motion Carried
,lanlcs F King. President
Ghosio, .ir, Vice-Presidem
John Bredemeycr
Michael J I)omino
PO Box i lTg
SOtllhoJd. NY 1197l
Telephone (631 765-1892
Fax (63 I) 765-6641
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Field Inspection/Worksession Report
Date/Time:
Natural Images Landscaping on behalf of PETER AND JOAN FRITZ request
a Wetland Permit to remove the existing rock revetment and extend
existing bulkhead to protect waterfront. Located: 755 North Parish Road,
Southold. SCTM# 71-1-8
Type of area to be impacted:
Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland
Sound Bay
Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland
Part of Town Code proposed work falls under:
__Chapt.275 __Chapt. 111 other
Type of Application: __ Wetland __Coastal Erosion Amendment
__Administrative__Emergency Pre-Submission Violation
Info needed:
Modifications:
Conditions:
Present Were: ~'J'~J. King 6B~Ghosio
L J. Bredemey~ ~ Michael Domino
Form filled out in the field by /~3
__ D. Bergen,
D. Dzenkowski
Mailed/Faxed to:
Date:
other
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY 11971
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
To:
Jim King, President
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner
LWRP Coordinator
Date: January 17, 2013
Re:
Proposed Wetland Permit for PETER AND JOAN FRITZ
SCTM#1000-71-1-8
Natural Images Landscaping on behalf of PETER AND JOAN FRITZ requests a Wetland Permit to
remove the existing rock revetment and extend existing bulkhead to protect waterfront. Located: 755
North Parish Road, Southold. SCTM# 71-1-8
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of
Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards.
Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this
department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is
CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its
written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney
James F. King, President
Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President
Dave Bergen
John Bredemeyer
Michael J. Domino
Town Hall Annex
54375 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Office Use Only
~7.CwOaStal Erosion Permit Application
ctland Permit Application Administrative Permit
, Amendment/Transfer/Extension
'-/ Received Application:~L[~_'~
~,eceived Fee:$ ~--~ t ~£'] I
~/Completed Application II ! 7~q !1 7~-
__Incomplete
SEQRA Classification:
Type I Type II Unlisted
NOV 2 9 2012
Coordination:(date sent)
7~LWRP Consistency Assqssnlent Form
-~CAC Refe~al Sent:
Date of Inspection:
Receipt of CAC Report:
Lead Agency Determination:
_fechnical Review:
'~Public Hearing Held: I 1'~3,] !.-~
Resolution: ' ~
Name of Applicant Azr££ + f, etr2-
MailingAddress 91 ~HnP~, ~o~ ~n~U~s~'~ ~/ //o~o
Phone Number:( ) $ ~7 - RWo -7
Suflblk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 7/' / - ~
Prope~yLocation: 75~- do~ ~'SR ~oa% ~o~o~o.,~ /19v/
(provide LILCO Pole ~, distance to cross streets, ~d location)
AGENT: ~TO~A~ /~-~.~ i ~cAA/~~- I~
(If applicable)
ad: 87a- qoqq
B~d of Trustees Application
GENERAL DATA
Land Area (in square feet):
Area Zoning:
Previous use of property:
Intended use of property: x0g3i ~,~ 7~,,~ ~.
Covenants and Restrictions on property? __Yes
If"Yes", please provide a copy.
Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? __
J No
//Yes No
If"Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review
and Elevation Plans will be required.
/
Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? __ Yes -/ No
If"Yes", please provide copy of decision.
Will this project require, any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.?
Yes v' No
Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? fi/ Yes __ No
Prior permits/approvals for site improvements:
Agency , , Date
__ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements.
Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency?
If yes, provide explanation:
,//No Yes
Project Description (use attachments if necessary): ;ormo ua
Trustees Application
WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA
Purpose of the proposed operations: ~/'e~o,.~ g,,Os 7'/~ ~3 o<.~'~4~,n,O
Area of wetlands on lot: ~ S~ square feet
Percent coverage of lot: ] %
Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland
edge of wetlands: b g feet
Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland
edge of wetlands: O feet
Does the project involve excavation or filling?
No ~/ Yes
If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards
How much material will be filled? ~0 cubic yards
Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: ~ ~' ~ feet
Proposed slope throughout the area of operations:
Manner in which material will be removed or deposited:
Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by
reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate):
PROJECT ID NUMBER
PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION
1. APPLICANT / SPONSOR
617.20
APPENDIX C
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor)
2. PROJECT NAME
county ~.gOFFOc~
SEQR
3.PROJECT LOCATION:
Municipality ',~'OC,'7'W ~ ~-,0
4. PRECISE LOCATION:~7,~..~/g~ ,Sffeet /~'~,~-/~;~/Addess and ~adD,~l~lntersect~ons.~ou7'''~ ~)~-~3Pmminent ~'/y[andmarks//<~-7 jetc -or provide mai)
5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New ~'~xpansion [~ModificatJon/alteration
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
7 AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: ri ,
Initially acres Ultimately '/? acres
8 WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS?
~'Yes [] No If no, describe bde~y:
ResT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.)
idential E~lndustdal []Commercial ~---~Agriculture []Park/Forest/OpenSpace []Other(describe)
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING,
AGEN Y (Federal, State or Local)
~es F~ No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval:
NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL
11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
~'Yes - If yes, llst name and permit / approval:
[]No
agency
12. ~ A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING P/ERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
[~fes ?cN~RTiFY T ? THE ,NFOR ~ PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicant/Sponsor NaF~i~~ Date:
If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency,
complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT Mo be completed by Lead A~lenc~/)
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR. PANT 617.47 If yes. coordinale the review process and use the FULL EAF.
F-Iv.., 171.o
S. WILL ~CTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR. FART 617.67 If No, a negative
declaration may be superaeded by another involved agency.
C. COULD AC3'ION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOU_OWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible)
C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quanffiy, noise levels, existing baffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal,
po{ential for erosion, drainage or I]o<xliog problems? Explain briefly:
I
C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or c~ltural resoumes; or community or neighbedmnd character? Explain bdel~y:
C3. Vegetation or faurm, fish, shelffish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Expiain briefly:
I
C4. A community's existing plans or goals as off. ally adopted, or a change in use or i~tensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain bdefly:
I
C6. Long term. short lerm, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1 -C57 Explain briefly:
C7. o. the~ impacts t;inclndin~l chan~es in use of either ~uanfit
/
1
O. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL AREA CEA ? Ill yes, explain briefly:
E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELy TO BE~t CONTROVERSy RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If ~es e~teffi:
PART I# - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by
INSTRUCTIONS: Foreachadvemeeffectidefltifledabove, determinewhetheritissubstaofial large importantorotherwisesigniflaanL Each
effect sh~ate be assessed in con~n with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probabiF~'y of o~curdng; ((;) duration; (d) irreversibillty; (e)
geographic scepe; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add altachrnents or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations c~llate
sufffetent detail to show lhat all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked
yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potenttallmpac~ of the preposed action on the environmental charaofe~'tics of the CEA.
Check thle box if yco have idenfified one or more pctenflally laege or slgnfiicant adverno impesfe which MAY occur. Then p(~l directly fe the FUU
EAF and/or prepare a positive dedarafion.
Check this box If you have determined, based on the inf<xma~n and analysis above and any suppodlng documentallon, that the proposed acllm
WILL NOT result th any slgni~cent ndveme environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessa[y, the masons supporfing thi.~
de~ennffiation.
Board of Trustees
Name of Lead Agency
Pdn~ or T~ Name of Responsible Offi~ Lead Age~
S~ alure o Responsible ~rin Le~gen~
Dale
President []
Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Preparer (if different from responsible officer)
Town of Sou- old
Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM
PROPERTY LOCATION: S.C.T.M. #: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A
STORM-WATEI~ GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN
~ District Section Block Lot (~:K I II'll:D BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUuIION l'll]t~# / WOKKASSESSMENT [ Yes No
a. What is tb,~ Total Area of the Project Parce s?
(Inctude Total Area of all Parcels located within 1 Will this Project Retafo Ail Siorm-Watar Run-Off
the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) /?~/~ Generated by a Two (2") Inch Rainfall on Site?
b. What is the Total Ama of Land Clearing W(S.F. / Acres) (This item will include alt run-off created by stie
clearing and/or construction activiges as well as all
and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed Site improvements and the permanent creation of
construction activffy? impervious surfaces.)
(S.F. / Acres)
PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (~o~ ~d~ P~ ..~, 2Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed
Drainage Structures Indicating Size & Location? This
Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and
.V--
~3 __
Slopes
Controlling
Surface
Water
Flow.
3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion zr
and sediment control practices that will be used to
control site erosion and storm water discharges. This
item must be maintained throughout the Entire
Construction Peded.
4 Will Ibis Project R~luire any Land Filling, Gradiog or
Excavation where there is a change to the Natural
Existing Grade involving more than 200 Cubic Yards~L~ --V
of Matedal within any Parcel?
5 Will this ApplicaUon Require Land Disturbing Activities
/
Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five ThousandL~ V
(5,000 S.F.) Square Feet of Ground Surface? --
6 is there a Natural Water Course Running through the
Site? is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction
General DEC awPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred (100') feet of a Wetland or
Submission of a SWPPP is requked for all Construction aclivifies involving soft Beach?
disiuebances of one (1) or ~r~re ac~es; including disbJrbances of less than one acre thai 7Will there be Site prepara0on on Existing Grade Slopes ~ /
are part of a larger common plan thai will ullima Idly disturb one or more acres of land; whic. h Exceed Fift.e, en (15) feet of Vertical Rise to
iocJuding Conslruction activities involving soil dislurhences of less ~han one (1) acre where On. ~Hundred (100) of Horizontal Distance? L.-J --
the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit is required tor storm water discharges.
SWPPP', Shall meet ,he Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways, Parking Areas or other impervious
for Storm Water Discharges from Cm~stmctton activity - Permit No. GP-O-10-O0t.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off
1. The SWPPP shall be prepared pdor to the submittal of the NOI. The NOI shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town Hght-of-way?
required, ges[-conslxuction storm weler management p~acUces that will he used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any
STATE OF NEW YORK, O f'/~- ,/./
covm'Y OF ss
q'ha[ I ........ ,..~....~....:2...v..,.....)....].....~.,.k,.~tName of individual skjning Document, .... ................ being duly swbm, deposes and says that he/she is the applicant tbr Pem~it,
he/ ae ......
(Owner, Cmbaclor. ,~9'~i: ~)'~o~i~ Officer, e~c.) ..............................................................
Owner and/or representative of the Ovmer or Owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to
make and file this application; that all statements contained iii this application are true to the.~,best of his lmo. g~ge and belief; and
that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. / ] / ]
Sworn to before me this; ///~ /
.......................... · --~......../':~... ....... day of ......... ...~.....~:...~... ................ 20..[.. '~- P/~ ~
Notary Public: ......... ~lq..~.,~.:...~ .~....:....: .................................. l.d../~...t ...................... ....~ ..................
......... .... .......... ,,
FORM-06/10
James F. King, President
Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President
Dave Bergen
John Bredemeyer
Michael J. Domino
Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd.
P.O. Box I 179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (631 ) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
In the Matter of the Application of
ECE VE
,lAN 1 5 2013
SoutholdTown
PETER & JOAN FRITZ
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
l, 5co47~ ~ ~--+~/~ , residing at /dba
being duly sworn, depose and say:
That on the } Ko day of .Sm~,.~m v- q ,201~ I personally posted the property known, as
75'S ~,,'-~ '¢,"',~h'° ~0. .%.~-~¼o\~ w~. hqw I
by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked
to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing.
Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesda% January 23~ 2013.
ated: //
(sl-gnature) ~
Sworn to before me this
/~ dayofda~ 20/3
}tar 4
N
PENNY .I~EDELL
Not~y Public, State of New York
MAILING OF NOTICE
~RTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS
EOE VE JAN 1 5 2013
Southold Town
Board of Trustees
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
~u~o ~ ~ ~.Y. I 1 ~ ~ [ o being d~y swo~ d~ ~ ~ ~t on ~e
//~h dayof_J~no~q ,20~,d~nmt~a~e~yof~eNofi~
s~ ~ in ~e Bo~d of T~t~Appli~fion, d~ ~ ~ch of~e a~ve ~
~m m ~e Mdr~ ~ o~site ~ r~ve ~; ~ ~e ~ ~
op~ ~ ~ of ~d ~ ~ ~e ~ of~d ~ ~ ~ on ~e c~t
~mt roll of~e To~ of Sou~old; ~at ~d Nofi~ w~ ~ at ~e U~ S~t~ Post
Offi~ at ~Cco~ I ~ , ~t ~d Nofl~ w~ m~l~ ~ ~h of~d ~ by
~RT~D ~~ ~CE~.
Day of ~Jd e~ ~ff~ ~, 20
' PENNY ~EDELL
Notary Pub/ic.State of New York
~ua//Nfo. 018E6099317
. . 'fled in Suffolk
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be hel.d by the
SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall, 53095 Ma~n Road,
Southold, New York, concerning this property.
OWNER(S) OF RECORD:"P~¢ 3'-o~n Fr~f~-
SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING:
To remove the existing rock revetment and extend existing bulkhead to protect waterfront.
TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
If you have an interest in project, you are invited to view the Town file(s)
which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal
business days between the hours of 8 a.m and 4 p.m.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1 892
Bo~of Trustees Application
County of Suffolk
State of New York
~qr'q %~ BEING DULY SWORN
DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE
TRUE TO THE BEST OF HISBrtER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK
WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY
BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT
AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES
HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING
UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS
APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR
REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO 1NSPECT THE
PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIE~ OF THIS AP~CATION.
Signature of Di'operty Owner
SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS <xgC~ DAY OF P~ O x/ ,20 i ~
Notary Public
~ard of Trustees Applicatio~
AUTHORIZATION
(where the applicant is not the owner)
I, g6~ ~/~"~,~ 7~'~/'7/Z. residingat 7/
(print owner of property) (mailing address)
t~ a/q ~ ~_ /%t/ //6).,,70 do hereby authorize
(Agent)
~';/-~ ( C4 c.{ ('-9- f~oo ('~ to apply for permit(s) from the
Sou3 Boar~wn Trustees on my behalf.
(Owner's signa'h~) ~ / (~
JAN 2 3 2013
~ld Town
. . Bo~ of Trustees Application
AUTHORIZATION
(where the applicant is not the owner)
(print owner of property)
residing at ?/~/wq?r,~ ADo/~ a
(mailing address)
do hereby authorize
(Agent)
to apply for permit(s) from the
Southold Bgard of Town T/~tees on my behalf.
(0 ne s signature) _D
APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE
TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM
The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics Dmhibits conflicts of interest on the east of town officcm and emolovees. The ouroose of
this form is to omvide info~ation which can alert the town of ~ossiblc conflicts of intem~t and allow it to take whatever action is
necessary ~o avoid same.
(Last name, first name, ~iddlc initial, unless you am applying in the name of
someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate, the other
person's or company's name.)
NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.)
Tax grievance Building
Variance Trustee
Change of Zone Coastal Erosion
Approval of plat Mooring
Exemption from plat or official map Planning
Other
(If "OtheF, name the activity.)
Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee
of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business,
including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a coq~oration
in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the sh~res.
YES NO J
Ify0u answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated.
Name of person employed by the Town of Southold
Title Or position of that person
Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check
the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided.
The town officer or employee or his or her spouse sibling parent, or child is (check all that apply):
A) thc oyvner of greater than 5% of the shams of the corporate stock oftbe applic0nt
(when the applicant is a corporation);
__.B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the
applicant is not a corporation);
__.C) an officer, director, parmer, or employee of the applicant; or
___D) the actual applicant.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP
Form TS 1
Town of Southold
LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM
A. INSTRUCTIONS
All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for
proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfxont Consistency Review Law. This
assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in
making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits
and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.
Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt
minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local
Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant
beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town).
3~
If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will
affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency
review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non-
suooorting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and
conditions, it shall not be undertaken.
B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION
A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's
website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the. Plalmiagl)epartment, all
local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. ~i [~ ~ ~-
SCTM# .] O0O ~71 - O I - o ~
!
Thc Application has been snbmitted to (check appropriate response):
Town Board
[] Planning Board ~ Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees
Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response):
(a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital
construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction)
Co) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy)
(c)
Nature and extent of action:
Permit, approval, license, certification:
Location of action:
Site acreage:.
Present land use:
Present zoning classification:
If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following
information shall be provided:
(a) Name of applicant:
(b) Mailingaddress: 71 ~'II/gP6I-.
(c) Telephone number: AreaCode~/~ - ~,~9'7- ~?-707
(d) Application number, if any:.
Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency?
Yes[~ No~] If yes, which state or federal agency?
C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or
not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy.
Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion.
DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,
preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and
minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
~ Yes ~ No ~Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III - Po)fcies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
[-] Yes ~ NoF-~i I Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria
[-] Yes ~-] No [--q/Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP
Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria
~ Yes [] No [-] Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section III
- PoliCies Pages 16 throu~ 21 for evaluation criteria
[] Yes [-~ No[~1 VlNotApplicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including
Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22
through 32 for evaluation criteria.
Yes No Not Applic~
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies
Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria.
~-~ Yes ~ No ~/Not Applicable
At, ach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous
substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria.
Yes ~ No [~Not Applicable
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public
resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation
criteria. ~N
[] Yes~ No otApplicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
WORKING COAST POLICIES
Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in
suitable locations. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria.
~-~ Yes [] No ~/Not Applicable
At-tach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic
Estuary and Town waters. See LV~RP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria.
At, ach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages
62 through 65 for evaluation criteria.
~ Yes [] No ~Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP
Section III - Polic~ges 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
~ Yes ~ No~1 I~ Not Applicable"
DATE
M ,VW
NATURAL
BANK
iMAGES
9
t'~, 2 9 20~2
'~', 2 9 2012
NATURAL IMAGES
20!2