Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFritz, Peter & Joan Mark Terry D E Q E 1 V E D Planning Department Southold Town Box 1179 JAN 2 4 2013 Southold,NY 11971 Aow Two January 23, 2013 Dear Mr. Terry, Thank you for taking the time to speak with me today in regards to Wetlands Permit TM#71-1-8 (Fritz property N. Parish Dr.) It is my understanding from our conversation that the reason that you found the application consistent with the LWRP, is only because of the pre-existing permit approved by the Trustees in 2011. In 2011, you found their permit application INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Because the Trustees approved a variation of the 2011 permit, it now makes the project consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan? This makes the 2013permit consistent with the 2011 permit. It does not make the project consistent with the LWRP. Thank you for your time and consideration. I appreciate that your department is quite busy. Sincerely, Maggie Merrill 700 N. Parish Dr. Southold,NY 11971 Cc: Town Trustees Conservation Advisory Council JAN 2 3 2013 V1lfl My name is Joan Fritz. My husband, Peter and I have owned the proper al 755 North Parish Drive since 1998 when we purchased it from my mother, who alon Southold Town with my father owned it since 1958. My family has been paying taxes ar iTrustees property for close to 6 decades. Members of my family have been residents of Southold town for almost nine decades. My father, maternal grandmother, great aunts,great uncles,aunts and uncles are all buried here, as will my mother, my husband and 1,and our children. We are before you tonight because of environmental and climatological changes that began before members of my family took up permanent residence in Southold. My husband is an insurance broker who over the years has specialized in insuring the worldwide offshore oil and gas exploration and production operations of some of the worlds largest and geographically diverse integrated oil companies. They operate in some of the world's most environmentally sensitive areas. Governments across the globe,the oil companies themselves and the insurance industry realize that what 20 years ago was called the "hundred year storm' is now the norm. Katrina and Rita devastated the Gulf of Mexico coast as well as the offshore energy industry; recent storms across the North Sea and Europe have caused billions of dollars of damage.As a result,governments, in order to protect the environment and lives,are exercising stricter control and requiring more robust design of all newly constructed offshore facilities.The insurance industry has responded by either only insuring those facilities designed to today's standards or for those underwriters willing to write older units in storm prone areas like the Gulf of Mexico their premium has risen up to 2,000% making it unaffordable for smaller companies. You may ask what this has to do with our request for a full bulk heading?We say it has everything to do with it. Storms like Sandy have become the norm and we argue that communities in storm prone areas need to be proactive in protecting the lives and property of their citizens while not damaging the environment. My husband and I are not scientists but it seems logical to us that when property is eroded the run off into the bays not only damages property but also harms the environment and causes contamination. If we look at our particular situation in 2011,while we had originally applied for full bulk heading,the Trustees and DEC approved the installation of approximately 50' of bulk heading and 50'of rock revetment.As the Trustees saw,Sandy did no structural damage to the bulk heading but a large portion of the rock revetment was destroyed with substantial erosion going directly into Southold Bay.We would liken the difference in the effectiveness of the bulk heading vs.the rock revetment to the difference between the strength of an offshore platform designed in 1980 and one designed today.While we are relieved we didn't suffer more damage and loss of property from Sandy,we also feel that had we been allowed a full bulk heading in 2011we would not be standing in front of the Trustees today again asking them to do what is right for both us as tax payers as well as the environment. As we said earlier, the community has an obligation to protect the property of all its citizens.We understand our neighbor has expressed a concern that by allowing us to extend our bulk heading it could increase the potential for erosion to her property from future storms. We take this concern seriously and have hired Mr. Joseph Fischetti PE who is here with me tonight. He assures us the extension of the bulk heading should not exacerbate any erosion to our neighbor's property from future storms. We thank you for the opportunity to come before you tonight and encourage you to take the bold step of approving our plans which will best protect both our property and the environment of the entire town of Southold and it's bays. "� iru2u, Jan. 15, 2013 Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Annex Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 D E C E I V E D Re: SUM # 1000-71-1-8 Peter & Joan Fritz JAN 1 5 2013 D 755 North Parish Drive 82 foot new bulkhead Southold own Board of Trustees Dear Trustees, In regards to the above referenced permit request, we would like you to know of our concern as owners of the adjacent properties (Croasdale 695 North Parish Drive, Merrill 700 North Parish Drive). We would like to register our objection to the proposed 55 feet of new bulkhead and 32 feet of new return bulkhead. Such a structure is against town code and we believe would cause substantial erosion to our property. We would respectfully like to ask the Fritz's to explore a less harmful alternative. As property owners, we empathize with the Fritz's desire to stem the erosion to their property, but do not want to see it happen at the expense of our property. Respectfully, �� e Margaret Merrill vI 700 North Parish Drive Margaret Merrill POA for Margaret Croasdale 695 North Parish Drive O�gpFFO(,rco • Peter Young,Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary � P.O. Box 117979 Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(63 1)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., January 16, 2013 the following recommendation was made: Moved by Derek Bossen, seconded by Doug Hardy, it was RESOLVED to NOT SUPPORT the Wetland Permit application of PETER & JOAN FRITZ to remove rock revetment and extend bulkhead to protect waterfront. Located: 755 North Parish Dr., Southold. SCTM#71-1-8 Inspected by: Derek Bossen, Peter Young The CAC does Not Support the application and recommends leaving the rock revetment in place and to enhance the rip-rap with native plantings, remove all irrigation, exterior lighting, and non-native vegetation from the buffer, and to extend the buffer an additional 5'. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried AsoN 1 8 Kdl uthold Board of 11usi CCs___. f FW 4 y Og F0�^ Inmas F.King.President �1 O� C�6., P.O_Hoc 1179 Bob Ghosio,.Ir.,Vice-President p+� ¢�y .Southold NY 11971 Dave Bergen p Telephone(6,1 765-1892 John Bredemeyer "t{w Fax(63 q 765-6641 Michael J. Domino G `F Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: � — � 6 Natural Images Landscaping on behalf of PETER AND JOAN FRITZ request a Wetland Permit to remove the existing rock revetment and extend existing bulkhead to protect waterfront. Located: 755 North Parish Road, Southold. SCTM# 71-1-8 Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 _Chapt. 111 _other Type of Application: Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment —Administrative—Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: c" lUor X f yrt_ iZ II 7 Conditions: ��14471- p Present Were: ✓J. King Ghosio `�/D. Bergen, � J. Bredemeyer Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by 1 / G GU Mailed/Faxed to. Date: v � 4 I I newY !, r � �, *qF �► H 91 W l awl gel h !� 4W /�� Iroc� �� �5 �� s� f I � � /�� � v✓1 , . :. ,:.� � - ��.� �. ; �. �.� >.. �--- �' E ° 1 Wf �u..f'Y. l-" N 1 11 e1 I _ COUNTY OF SUFFOLN © y o rnox m� _Q_ _. _ s creel PmoeMTV Servkenevx�' .,. E 71 NO OFFICE LOCATION: OF SU(/jyo MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 y Southold, NY 11971 (car. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) co Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 a�0 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM 1E Q To: Jim King, President JAN 1 8 2013 Town of Southold Board of Trustees Socthald iovrn From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: January 17, 2013 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for PETER AND JOAN FRITZ SCTM#1000-71-1-8 Natural Images Landscaping on behalf of PETER AND JOAN FRITZ requests a Wetland Permit to remove the existing rock revetment and extend existing bulkhead to protect waterfront. Located: 755 North Parish Road, Southold. SCTM# 71-1-8 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney James F. King, President • ��Of so�fyo • Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President Ile P.O. Main Road . Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold, New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G Q Michael J. Domino Telephone(631) 765-1892 Z93 COUNTi, Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only oastal Erosion Permit Application f Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit " i Amendment/Transf r/Ext nsion Received Application:�2- NOV 2 9 2012 V Complete Fee:$iC L /Completed Application 1 ICI'J 4 11_i2- _Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type IType IIUnlisted Coordination:(datesent) >�drocan 7-LWRP Consistency Ass ss ent Form 1 1 1.1 I/aT,.��� ' Affl)iccd � F'c� rf^a fr W CAC Referral Sent 3 L I f n:Date of Inspectio G+td a e� Receipt of CAC Report: Yn r"al f;c-i� Lead Agency Determination: echnicalReview: UvC✓t Public Hearing Held: 3 3 Resolution: Name of Applicant PT 6,= + jo All Fie1TZ Mailing Address ?i 0jjPPcsi ;),o /YJRNHASSE7T /t).)/ iioao Phone Number:( ) G o27 - d-70 -7 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 7/ / 8 Property Location: 755 lJok-m Pfl QJSH -RoA /J So L, c)j- ID, AN. i/S 7 / 6 crDSs' T-*Vty�VW. R (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: '0/9T0RAL- fJn -�.s anJ/Jgc,aAinJC, /NC (If applicable) Address: 449gD Cvu;o g Phone: 6 3/- '73 4- 6 a 7 9 SC"kcak Cells $7d - yo`I y X� Y\N�? B d of Trustees Application• GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): /'7, Area Zoning: fT ES/ D E.0%/ Previous use of property: kSs ' oen%T1A Intended use of property: sQis;nL:NTJA / Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes V No If"Yes", please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? Yes No If"Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. / Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes d No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes �/ No Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? ZNo Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): Lrmoya Rock QC-V6T M 6 A.) Boa# of Trustees Application • WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: // &x T6i�Jo 45X/s r iA)G 6 ue,K14g A6 Area of wetlands on lot: A S'7-< square feet Percent coverage of lot: / Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 6 L?feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: O feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? 5O cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: a feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: :3M nLi. ZnAVAIop- .3R),o Sr66,Q Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): �o P�EnJIG �He /?isk of AVru,,Et: 4-'koS/On/ PROJECT ID NUMBER • 61720 . SEQR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1.APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME �. fB.Qr OAA� F/T2 13jz-"4q CA'D L-CX T£AlS/O.J 3.PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality 15OU-7 7;/0�,0 County JL)FFOt,AJ 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and ,RQad Intersections, Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map 7S5 N, ,. 19R4sA/ K01910, 1&0o7-Hd-,0 Nt1 // 3 New Expansion ❑Modification alteration 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑ i, 6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: CxrdA)n gxlsr7A✓4- 9JL/(H6.9A -o P261JgN7- `UTORc ERcsioA% 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately / acres 8.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? I RrYes ❑ No If no,describe briefly: 9.WFjAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) Residential ❑Industrial El Commercial Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space ❑Other (describe) i 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGEN Y (Federal, State or Local) 7es n No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 11.DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? FoYes ❑No ` If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 7tuoHr. (rp.7'Gfi ),O S-0 / - q 73,Q - 4 00 9 164)00 12. A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING ERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? 10yes ❑No I CERTIFY LATHE INFOR TI PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponsor Na Date: Signature ` (Z If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART 11 - IMPACT ASSESSMENT o be completed by Lead Agency) A DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes a No a. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. Yes Q No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) Ct. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or needing problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species.significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. F- A ity's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: _ _.. .. . C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: C7.-Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of ene ? Explain br fl :- - - --- D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? If es,explain briefly: Yes ❑✓ No THERE,OR iS THERE LIKELY TO BE.CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ifYea lain: Yes 0 No I H PART IN-DETERMINA71ON OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: Foreach adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)selling(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(a) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain-- -- sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse Impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. Nquestion d of part it was checked yes,ftcletennaration ofsignificance mustevaluats the potential impadofthe proposed adorn on theemirommental charadedsticsofthe CFA Check ails box ayou have iderrtlned aria ormare potentially large orsignifaamadverse k 1pactswhidl MAY occur.Then proceed direcnyto fife FULI EAF andfor prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if YOU have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation.that the proposed acift WILL NOT result In any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, are reasons supporting th determination. Board of Trustees p '10 Al I (D Z0 i3 Name of Lead Agency / Dale l` ll A) President p Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Tine of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible icer in Le gency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Aft Town of Sou old ® Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM IV PROPERTY Loca7toN: s.c.T.M.g: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A Ol STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN _I5 mct act n -96cW-- 'L t CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is tbis Total Area of the Project Parcels? Will this Project Retain All Stomr-Water Run-Off (include Total Area of all Parcels located Within /7;3T Generated by a Two(2')Inch Rainfall on Site? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (s F/Aoes (This item will incude all runoff created by site / ❑ b. What is the Total Area of Land Clean ) ]L rig clearing and/or cludeu llir n activities as well as all and/or Ground Disturbance for the pmposed Site Improvements and the permanent creation of construction activity? (S.F./Acres) impervious surfaces.) 2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed ❑ PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Peach Aequona Peaas aaNeaaea) Drainage Structures Indicating Size&Location?This Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and CXTt NO Cxf s ry N XJUr K JI A/� Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. 1 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion ❑ (J7 u rQ.C 4 )&S/O N and sediment control practices that will be used to ✓ control site erosion and storm water discharges. This item must be maintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. 4 Will thisProject Require any Land Filling,Grading or Excavation where there is a change to the NaturalExisting Grade involving more than 200 Cubic Yards ❑ of Material within any Parcel? rj Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities ❑ V Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the — Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Welland or Submission of a SWPPP is required for all Construction activities involving sell Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more acres; including disturbances of less than one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes / are pad of a larger common plan that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land; whigh Exceed Fifteen(IS)feet of Vertical Rise to V/ including Construction activities involving soil disturbances of less than one(1)acre where OnsaHundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit is required for storm water discharges. El (SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas Or other impervious ❑ for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Permit No.GP-0-10-001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off 1.The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the NOL The Not shall be into and/or In the direction of a Town right-of-Way? submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. 2.The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, ❑ required,post-construction uctiun storm water management prac0 that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any constructed to reduce the pollutants in storm water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit In addition,me SWPPP shall Area?(rob Item will NOT IMwae ta.ewran,aen xonveway Aaansl identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges. NOTE: If Any Answer to Questions One through Nim is Answered with a Check Mark 3.All SW PPPs that require the postconstmclbn storm water management practice in a Box and 0u cemdruetion site disturbance is between 5,000 S.F.a 1 Acre in area, component shall be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed in New York a Stom-Water,Grading,Drainage&Erosion Control Plan is Required by the Town of that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of Storm Water Management. Southold and Most be Submitted for Review Prior to Issuance of Any Building Permit (NOTE: AChetle Maek(�)andlor Msver/w Bade Weslion is RegWred/ore Complete Applicalbn) STATE OF NEW YORK, r COUNTY OF......�(,�..T..... ..L�....SS 71hat I, ...... V..... �1.. .Z................... being duly swom,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, (Name of individual signing DocumenQ And that he/she is the -.� .....!... U-)n-e✓� ............ ...................................................................................................................... (Owner,Contractor,Agent,Coryorete OMcer,ele.) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are h Lie to the es[of his kno ge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me this; ...............................................day of.... ... `20.1. o2 C P ....... .................. . Notary Public: ......... / '.'it RMH ure of Applicant) FORM - 06/10 fhlotarV Pubf•' ;III 111nvv lul ?h • o�ggfF0lfic • James F. King,President - Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr. ,Vice-President P.O. Box 1 179 Dave Bergen Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyer Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J. Domino df '! Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD rE E IE BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1 5 2013 In the Matter of the Application of hold Town fT PETER & JOAN FRITZ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Sco"-V IF KV-U�Z residing at/dba Ng'wrct ] Ty--)aG-,cS Lcu r �S-C4 *n 3 t� q0 Covn�� ?LoJ e 48 Ptt^onkC- N`i' IR -5 J being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the I� day of 201� I personally posted the property known as 75 � wQrA-h rtsll Ro. hq 1 I by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, January 23, 2013. Dated: // / 5//3 (signature) Sworn to before me this 1 day of,�vt 2013 Notary Public PENNY WDELL Notary Public State of New York No.0113E6099317 0uslified in Suffolk County Carlmlf M Expires Sept.29,0 I U.S. Postal Service�. iCERTIFIED MAIL,. RECEIPI, Er (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) M1 % E Q E 0 V E n { O Postage $ 095$,.—C) IIunUUIJ 0 Devoted Fee JAN 1 5 2013 Postmark O ReturnReceipt Fee Here nl OO (Endorsement Required) Fee �!� IF MAILING OF NOTICE Restricted Delivery (Endorsement Require( \ �- ;RTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Southold Town vl Total Postage&Fees $ Board of Tr m Ot/t�Y2(113. ustees SentT, t` Sheet,W�.No-= / '1� \�1CJ {' ` IV` �__ �___ of PO Sox Na —% .......... Address: ary,Stare,iir+ PS Form ,r August d See Reverse for N �. IG 'i -Instructions lo9S NO6-l\ QL tSYN Sow-4 01d, t R +" Y cw�� rOCLQso-r'0 Po BOX a4oL ,SCLL4,C�td., L kR-1 JC)uV-\ C 90-*T-4- Mev-r, 11 , �� Nor�t. Po t'(st � Dr,ve Sc�u�t��td +�y I�i�1 t STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ,residingat t-190-SaG,u„ Fl being duly sworn,deposes and says that on the day of a n vct r 20_a,deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trust Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set Opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at_ iaC ✓) I � that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons b CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. y Sworn to before me this / S Day of id h doh 20� Not b11. — T Ni PPENNY bl c s6te of New York Qu No 01§E609931) lon EEVirees� ntyc 0 ('� , NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S)S OF RECORD: I?e�er k Sv06n Fr' fz SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: To remove the existing rock revetment and extend existing bulkhead to protect waterfront. TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: s W&Wsdaj , January a 3, c;013 - on or-a6 U4 y:00 �►? If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection rior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours ofp8 a.m and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631 ) 765- 1892 Boa# of Trustees Application • County of Suffolk State of New York BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIE OF THIS A CATION. Signature of operty Own SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF I3 0 20 1 a- Notary Public VICIG InTH Lard of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) J 1, P lfL residing at 7/ C Cad -(print owner of property) (mailing a dress) 14 Q A A G S St�—t A //0.30 do hereby authorize (Agent) 1C4Lk u a / p/DU/ to apply for permit(s) from the Sou h Boar of wn Trustees on my behalf. (Owner's signaZu ) E V Y r JAN 2 3 2013 i i�JJ But d Town Trust. Boo of Trustees Application • AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) 1, ArgP-e✓yAA-) AZIfz residing at 7 �)oAo (print owner of property) (mailing address) AnA)J419S3f I N d ilo 3 o do hereby authorize /1)9TUp-A L (Agent) lmp 9 8S 1 AID SCAPi AJ5 /AJ c- to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town stees on my behalf. (Owner's signature) APPLICANUAGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM i The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the cart of town officers and employees The purpm of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. //,, YOUR NAME: �LrrC� d%10AAJ / k/7 2— (Last name,first name,rpiddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) i NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) _ Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other,name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest.`Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. i Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicantlagentImpresentative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): fl, _A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or - D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 17- t;Ysf 6 iL 2od Z Signature C Print Name \� Form TS 1 Town of Southold • • LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the.Pl n�,niugpepartment, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION 7",r NOV 2 9 L SCTM# DOb - L- D I 0 S' t J PROJECTNAME gxm o �x�sr ,v�, �uuCH€A4n / `RIT2 The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees L�1 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan, subsidy) (c) Permit,approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: p 6XT61J4 g-sISTiNcr /JULf1/aEA4 TO f2L�l�niT ✓7y72L �i/�Og�� � Location of action: %5 /l1o. 19)elSH �)O r .Q UTNo�D 4)y //5• Site acreage: /H Present land use: kC- S/DCN i A L- Present zoning classification: ti s/ nrnNii A 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided:: (a) Name of applicant: 745t�z w /oAn� F.e�rz (b) Mailing address: 7/ O1J APC L �o JY)ApJHASSCT > A) //oa 0 (c) Telephone number: Area Code(/) - 6.22- �7-7o-7 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes 1� No❑ If yes, which state or federal agency? N)LS D Lr C C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No �ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Po cies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria El Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 9 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 throu 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. 7 ❑ ❑ Yes No Not Applio • Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeAF-1 No I Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No dNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Townn waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No I-1C1 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ { No�1 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pges 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 9 Not Applicable — o PREPARED BY ITLE [?S DATE II 2G (Z k q A)D-3c AP 1 NC; PRO cop 60af7Racf az'Af A! 11 AItLkHOAp :p.,{ jtlli �1XIA LAMGWA'r�OV'j.#PAP WITH of CAN T*WA1PV-1M CAMP- EX ICTIN& 14' 0 O>t. G o t R6VF&ITATE OULKHRAD AAL573-05,/0"a MNW Tor OF BANK --re OP q;; Apt kK t LAND Qr G`ZANP dr C = �� StRAGUSA/VO a Hot,t, s a wJ' 2 9 20�2 �r I to o A1tAi . ._._ . .. N7-4 hi iae.od 4 Y VV TREPAkVP N ORTH P,4K/ S/-/ D /KIVLC - - ArF0CAhT PPr?)t t ./oAN FAt/ Tz NATURAL IMAGES 7/ CNAP-CLR© AP' L, . .»'""" A+f AN N A ¢t c i /A/•yy. N 05 7 g S Al/�tAt 7N A AAt fW n&A* a Sorr �JpvtMOGPo MY. //171 SCrAA /oa• -7�-i-,S 304Tf-I c�� a �0Y SO' q� Ex IDur.�CNe{/C PROPOSED CONSTRUCT 55 OF NE\y 6ULkN Env 1xxk 4S� qya .aC.{GN ; KNlAO N Q Dv3rrl0iAXAwc4-w ARCA x U reare.. eF�ss. !a0 h o 2 9 2012 PREPak.Pp F3`(: -. .. --- NATURAL I M A G E S 7 3Sr+ver++��w,gis.N�Gbla SC7�ur /oocs-�'i-ti c F�tG vw�o.utr,��G.s/wvvw.++aa ac J��.tus�wa.u.�o�e[vss7ws+�r YviTFI CL�.tr+77tucKQ�O-n-i FILL- .4rYRitOX. Cu.7iD�S= RCY�9a.TrARl.Ls w.ral CI,/sa i4JNQ'}t/CIN 1'JlJGN �Rs.QAXMW- �a��.VAd?iC5 VJU To CASs • 4xG \ 4'± 1 eY4 oVA7r A4 s P1AWC44 Tz�1a.ilccerl�Ar1n QCIaGACa AS P-S.tc,e- FiLL TZ"�-FACC VJNYG 6 ox6zawp, G'a.C. 7�ilaS Bu� KH,E,aD GR03' S�GT�On! PKtFAKEP "d 2 9 2012 NA 1 URAL I M A G E S p /79NNasy77 , A//y//p3o 7S.S/1/a,C 7-/1 lea R i s�.• D e `SOu--/04-0 Ny //ri7/