Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-7979 John M. Bredemeyer III,President � Of SU�lyOlo Town Hall Annex Michael J.Domino,Vice President 54375 Main RoadP.O. Box 1179 James F. King,Trustee Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen,Trustee G Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 Charles J.Sanders,Trustee Fax(631) 765-6641 �y�4UNT`I,�� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE # 1029C Date: Auizust 12, 2014 THIS CERTIFIES that the construction of a fixed wood pile and timber pier including (2) ladders and(2) outhaul piles all waterward of the apparent high water line; construction of a wood deck landward of the approx high water line; and construction of access stairs to beach above apparent high water At 16633 Reservoir Road, Fishers Island,New York Suffolk County Tax Map# 9-8-3.2 Conforms to the application for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated February 27, 2012 pursuant to which Trustees Wetland Permit#7979 Dated December 12, 2012,was issued and Amended on December 11, 2013 and conforms to all of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The project for which this certificate is being issued is for the construction of a fixed wood pile and timber pier including(2) ladders and (2)outhaul piles, all waterward of the apparent high water line; construction of a wood deck, landward of the ap r,p� ox. high water line; and construction of access stairs to beach above apparent high water. The certificate is issued to HIRAM MOODY, JR. owner of the aforesaid property. ?_ *W1% 6Ao"�Jr__ Authorized Signature John M. Bredemeyer 111, President guFF0t tIra r Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Michael J. Domino,Vice-President ��� �Gy P.O.Box 1179 James F. King y Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen Telephone(63 l)765-1892 Charles J.Sanders 1 � � Fax(63 l)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION: Ch. 275 Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction Y2 constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: James F.King, President �F SoUryO Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President '\� �p 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer . Telephone(631) 65-1892 Michael J. Domino l''CO�'� Fax(631) 765--6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 11, 2013 Mr. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. PO Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: HIRAM MOODY, JR. 16633 RESERVOIR ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 9-8-3.2 Dear Mr. Neilson: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at their Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, December 11, 2013: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVE the Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit#7979 to slightly modify the proposed pier structure by constructing it in a continuous slope in almost the same exact alignment and one dog- leg turn at the top of the slope section at a level elevation of 10 feet above mean low water`and then projecting straight back into the point of the existing path; and construct access stairs to beach above apparent mean high water; and as depicted on the revised site plan prepared by Docko Inc., last dated October 22, 2013 and stamped approved on December 11, 2013. Any other activity within 100' of the wetland boundary requires a permit from this office. This is not a determination from any other agency. If you have any questions, please call our office at (631) 765-1892. Sin ly, James F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK:amn FISHERS ISLAND SOUND � f � a✓' 1 '� ��I���"�jl\\\YYY Q NwItLLS ��a 1� ��y Ali SIZE ISLAND �� .1 65 21 17 0'0" ',] o�6d IN A 14 w % Q :ebeih / Field NOV - 4 .�. _•°` .: s a z,"'`w./+�`� ,�_.�, SOr.d>u�tliunn4 �-^-�- ' SOUTHOLD LOCA TION I"IAP REFERENCE GRrIc�sc N/F PROPERTY of i (iV. BOO 0800 IN YARDS HARVEY L r SITE i NOTES: PROPERTY Of 1.ELEVATION DATUM 15 APPARENT MEAN LOW MOODY " 1 1 LOWER WATER(MLLWj, r\ /:= ..: 1 I •. 2.TIDE DATA IS TAKEN FROM 2011 NOAA TIDE TABLES REFERENCE:SILVER EEL COVE. 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT TL9sLF OF 4+7 WIDE FD(ED WOODf PILE AND TIMBER PER INCLUDING STAIRS TO THE NEW PIER and BEACH,TWO LADDERS AND TWO OUTI-AUL PILES, OUT HAUL PILES ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH -r^^• , '�<"J WATER UNE CONSTRUCT T7:LF OF 4-FT WIDE WOOD DECK LANDWARD OF THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER UNE. F Wa `°'�ar 4.PROJECT PURPOSE - THIS IS A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. N/F PROPERTY of 5.THESEAPPIJCATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT ''{ � / � � .� CLEVELAND . A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE :. NOT CONSTRUCTION CO I`TTRAGT DOCUMENTS.A / . �' y•� �` TOWN BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. 1 G.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: ✓` ` l .�.:, .. NORTH: WEST: R DD(ON H.$JANET H.HARVEY DONALD R CLEVELAND JR 2004 STRINGTOWN ROAD 77 SHADY LANE SPARKS,MO 21152 STAMFORD,CT p69O3 PROJECT: NEW PIER and OUTHAUL PILES IF REVISED 54-12 DEG LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD KE T wr TIDAL DATUDESGR PROJECT SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 • U p C K U . PROJECT DESGRlPTION APPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY ( W REVISED 9-20-12 TO.S. AGENT. SHEE '10F4 . 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION1 - 4 1�OCK0, INC. X68692• 4, REVISED 10-22-13 D.I. Kekh B.Neilson,PE FESSIONPV PROJECT DESCRIPTION �5M 5 o R P 0 8939 FAX 860572 7569 EMAIL docko0sner.ner DWG 11-09-2329 Ke"B.Nelson,Docko Inc. N1/2013 357 FT'1 Moody IE.A. MIN „ A2EPFNi MEAN LOW LOoVER WATER APPARENT MEAN �(MLLWj FJ_dJ.O HIGH WATER -„ EL-i SITE STONE SLOPE PROPERTY Of 5 TOP OF MOODY IIp � -J.s BMIK i +� 111E 22 \ i LAWN AREA APPROX NElNl j \\(�-SEWERU APPROXIMATE Bi' �"°`�N LIMIT OF _a< PPPROXIMATE LIMIT '� \ \ PATH SPA25E EELGRASS , -26 OF SPARSE EELGRA55 `I' J woaD APPROIOMATE LIMITS OF ,'WOOD POST, I RAM P DENSE EELGRA65 _29 WOOD DECK 7.1: 111E I 4.4 / EDGE OF 10 / BRUSH -J9 n SANDY BEACH / = APPROX LIMITS 9.A MLLW.� SIL�/EF2 OF TIDAL WETLANDS — — ALF eo EEL EDGE OF 01 R CLEVELAND,JR - CRISS / EJGIS7-1 NJ / GRAPHIC SGNF 1'v NOV — 4 2013 3O 15 0 3D SW thrid iown_ SURVEY by CME ASSOGATEs ELEVATIONS ARE 11ASED ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER(MLLW) Bpard of Trus els PROJECT: NEW PIER and OUTHAUL PILES REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD f NE yy y CONTOURS$ SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK K T14 SPOTGRADES ADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL DOVE -REVISED 9-20-12 DEC DATE OCTOBER 14,2011 n 0 C A 0 * Z 9 APPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY cc COMMENTS$PROJECT w -REVISED 10.10-12 DEC AGENT: SHEET 2 OF 4 ` SILVER EEL COVE WIDTH DOCGKO, INC. 68692' �$ Keith B.Nelle°^,PE U R P 0 R �' 90FESSIONPV Mystic,CT 06355 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7.569 DWG 11-09-2329 EMAIL dockogsnel'.ner Keith B_ Ne'Jso,,, Docko Inc. 10/31/2013 9:12 AM Moody_26.dwy N PLAN �/1 EW GRAPHIC SCALE V=20 ° 20 10 020 (� APPARENT `\\ Q MEAN LOW LOWER ..� ° �8U` WATER(MLLW)EL=J.O APPARENT MEAN x _1'4 -HIGH WATER EL-265't �i ' APPROVEML v'y ARD OF Tts EES �� x SITE TrE N BLDR �; PROPERTY of BUD z 2 \ MOODY 52tFT {I ? �� 'y ".• yr I � wul ,y .,r BLDRREL ' x' f Ir-u tP tOxFT NE WOE PIER � 535p' BEGINNING DECK EL 74a nA3' , .1X -2.6 X lµ SII 4 11 NEW!ADDERS 1.0 U9HT ww�tlssr�Gs�Tt DF k 10rFT BLDR I �__� - ro EW RAULJ'CrYP) 1.0 x •� END PER EL FTW � ! 8-(N PIER SUP�RT/ REMOVE EXISTING 4.7 20 _ / 60 SF WOOD DECK 4 I WOO PILES(TYp) -2.g � APPROXIMATE LIMITS L <,, OF SSPARSE EEl RASSWQ�POS EW STAIRS 4. ._TO BEACH APPROXIMATE 3 B r` uSPARSE NEW IC*DIAMETER 07 �,p4Y SANDY EDGE OF EELGRASS lllXALL PILE(rYP) y o` BEACH BRUSH x �,X APPROX,UMrrS APPROXIMATE UMrr5 Q OF TIDAL WETLANDS OF DENSE EELrvRAjh / EDGE OF GRASS �A SURVEY by GME A55OGWTES V — 4 2013 ELEVATIONS ARE B4,5E0 ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER(MLOM PROJECT. NEW PER and OUTHAUL PILES REVISED 10-22-13 D.I °i '-'1 V15ED 5-1-12 EG LOCATION: FlSHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PIER CONFIrd o_f Try g SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK and STAT SPOTGRADES ADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE KE w -REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 U 0 C K p TIE-OFF PILES APOLIGANT: HIRAM F.MOODY ,. REVISED 9-20-12 T.O.S. AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 �• _ _ _ 9 ¢ COMMENTS$PROJECT EDOC<0, INC. `w. ' ' W• -REVISED 9-28-12 DEG Kekh B.Neilson,PE .l- ��� SUPPORT PILE DIM. MysMc,GT 063555 OQ X88692 �a ' REVI5ED 10-10-12 DEC 860 572 8939 FAX 860572 7569 DWG 11-09-2329 90pCalNPS SILVER EEL CAVE WIDTH EMAIL dockoS net.net Ke"B.Nelleon, nc. 1V120133-57 PM Moodyl'H.dwg AT uu 2047 NOV - 4 2013 SOLD OIU 70O ii 4�FT NEW IO OVTHAUL PILE DECK r"- TOP EL 17-FTs(IYP) Burd of TrustmEW PLE SUPPORTED PER WAIH END DECK EL 5tFT NEW 8-IN SUPPORTCK4 --- TOP EL 4-FTABOVE DEGK(7YP) NEW SPLfT CLAMP and c. ' —PHWL 3.12x— — — — — — - — GROSSBRACE(TYP) -IVL IL0.18 TECRPDE AT END OF PIER SPARSE Pr�SRASS r:; :80170M SFDIMENIS z , NOTE DECKING-NOT GCA EIV D �/I EW TRTTRT�1TED.HARDWOODS MUST BE CERTFlED BY FOREST STEWARDSHIP GRAPHC SCALE i'=10' COUNCIL 10 5 O 10 LIGHT TRANSMISSIVE DECK NEW 4-FT WIDE PIER OVER EELGRASS BEGINNING DECK EL 10iFT NEW 84N PIER SUPPORT PILE PIERANGLE POINT TOP EL 4sFTABOVE DECK(T1'P) MAXIMUM SLOPE 1:10 NEW RAILS(TYP) 10epT('fYP) END PIER EL 5sF7 r NEW LADDER BiFT 7SFT AHN/L— ALWL--\_ mw—/ y '•v -,;'" ', NEW 4-FT NIDE STAR5 .:44y4� .["SS..1 V 4 't, '•�Y4dxw '{*fi.'TY J }v-: ,BOttOMSEDIMENTS• ��, >4a*`' u ,y7c-s wAPPROXIMATEwE"�' `�x�. APPROXIMATErUMR�h STONE SLOPE SAID SILT 'vAPPROXIMATE LIMR of` "A LIMRof ��.� of SPARSE EELGRA55 5PAR5E n - DEN5=EI EELGRASS EELGRA5S PRO PI L_E CP,-PHC SCALE 1'=20' 20 10 0 20 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON PROJECT: NEW PIER and OUTHAUL PILES MEAN LOW LONER WATER(MLLW) REVISED 10-2213 D.I. REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROFILE a END VIEW I PROFILE SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK TOB �FTERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE REVISED&2-12 H.M.H M ONKEI ` DATE OCTOBER 0 C I{ p 4 71E-OFF PILE APPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY .�cli REVISED 9-20-12 T.O.S. * 2 9 ¢ COMMENTS$PROJECT AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 �• _ __ _ 4 REVISED9-2a12DEC 1�OGK0, INC. 'N�, %4p 2 2 SUPPORT PILE$PIER KeNh B.NelLson,PE 0$ P 0 A O 068692'1 tr�� CLEARANCE DIM.and PIER � 55 ELEVATION 572 8939 WO572 9 p�yOFE 510NPV EMAIL•dodw0wet.net DWG 11-09-2329 Kenfi B.NeZ',cMko Inc. 1V V2013 350 PM Moady_4G.Arg gyFFO( James F.King,President P� P.O.Box 1179 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen ? Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer Fax(631)765-6641 Michael.1.Domino Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report Date/Time: X02' L/— / 3 /- /-/' )eev pe-e J Docko, Inc. on behalf of HIRAM MOODY, JR. requests an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit #7979 to slightly modify the proposed pier structure by constructing it in a continuous slope in almost the same exact alignment and one dog-leg turn at the top of the slope section at a level elevation of 10 feet above mean low water and then projecting straight back into the point of the existing path; and construct access stairs to beach above apparent mean high water. Located: 16633 Reservoir Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 9-8-3.2 Tye of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 _Chapt. 111 _other Type of Application: _Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment _Administrative_Emergency_Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions:_ ✓w/NDtZ zrfyq,�� f Present Were: __,edKing `�. Ghosio L-15113ergen, Bredemeyer o-Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: _ Dooko Inc, Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,M flys c,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:pernib0docko.07 nE °' I N� ' October 31,2013 , unuS Mr.James King,President NOV - 4 2013 Southold Board of Trustees P.O.Box 1179 5wthaid nin Southold,NY 11971 Board d Th, tais RE:Moody Dock,Fishers Island SCTM#9-8-3.2 Administrative Amendment Dear Mr.King, Following up on conversations with Ms. Elizabeth Cantrell of your office, I respectfidly request an administrative permit amendment for Town of Southold Trustees SCTM#9-8-3.2. This permit was to build a full length fixed pier with two tie-off piles, stairs to the beach and connection to existing path at the property of Mr. and Mrs. Hiram Moody located on Silver Eel Cove on Fishers Island,NY. In speaking with Mr. Moody and the contractor for the project, Gwenmor Marine Construction of Mystic, Connecticut, it has been decided that the full length pier should be sloping rather than leveling off and rebuilding existing stairs and the deck landing system that has existed for decades at this site. Instead the pier will be a continuous slope in almost the same exact alignment as the approved pier and one dogleg turn at the top of the slope section at a level elevation of 10 feet above mean low water and then projecting straight back into the point of intercepting the path from Mr.Moody's house. There are no adverse conditions created by this change in slope and the very slight alignment only changes the position of the pier by a foot or so at the point of the bend. The increased elevation of the pier will decrease the amount of bottom shading,consistent with the intentions of this permit. The purpose of this modification is to improve ease of access for Mr.Moody and his family. A stair will emanate from the level section of the pier and will run down to the beach landing on the sandy sediments just at or above the apparent high water line. This modification will not affect utilities, docking position or use of the slip and will benefit not only the access by the Moody's but also diminish shading and hopefully provide a positive environmental impact on the shallow sub-tidal waters where eel grass has grown in the past. Attached are our application drawings which have been amended to show this very slight change in configuration and an application check in the amount of$50 for the tidal wetlands permit amendment. I tout that you will find this submission adequate and acceptable for processing at the November meeting as an administrative amendment. Please let me know if the need for further information or discussion arises and I will reply promptly. Your assistance,as always,is appreciated. Yours Truly, Docko Inco rpoi� rated Keith B.Neilson,P.E. KBN:tw CC:Hiram Moody Christian McGugan,Gwenmor Marine Andrew Walker,NYS DEC Frank Tangorra,USACOE FILE: 11-09-2329 MOODY gUFfO(,� James F.King,President ppm 4p Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-Presidents P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen I Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyer �,y • 4w Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.Domino 'I'D( 10- Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 1St day of construction % constructed Project complete, compliance inspection BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 7979 DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 ISSUED TO: HIRAM MOODY,JR. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 16633 RESERVOIR ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND I SCTM# 9-8-3.2 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on December 12.2012, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Docko Inc and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to construct 118LF of 4 ft. wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including two ladders and two outhaul piles, all waterward of the apparent high water line; construct+/-I ILF of 4 ft. wide wood deck, landward of the approximate high water line; with the condition that a copy of the NYSDEC annual report regarding the eel grass beds be submitted to the Board of Trustees; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., last dated October 10, 2012 and stamped approved on December 12, 2012. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. �gUFFQI,�c 0. NOV h TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Pennittee Hiram Moody,Jr residing at 33 Reservoir Road Fishers Island. New York as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: l. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will,at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months,which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Pennittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved,to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized,or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Pennittee of the completion of the work authorized. 9. That the Pennittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit,which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F. ffing, President r3F sorry Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President ,�0� �� 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer A Q Michael J. Domino � �0 Telephone (631) 765-1892 (,eco N Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 12, 2012 Mr. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. PO Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: HIRAM MOODY, JR. 33 RESERVOIR ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 9-8-3.2 Dear Mr. Neilson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, December 12, 2012 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Docko, Inc. on behalf of HIRAM MOODY, JR. applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated February 27, 2012 with a revised project description on November 5, 2012, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the application be found Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on December 12, 2012, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, 2 0 WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees have found the application to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of HIRAM MOODY, JR. to construct 11 81-F of 4 ft. wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including two ladders and two outhaul piles, all waterward of the apparent high water line; construct +/-11 LF of 4 ft. wide wood deck, landward of the approximate high water line; with the condition that a copy of the NYSDEC annual report regarding the eel grass beds be submitted to the Board of Trustees; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., last dated October 10, 2012 and stamped approved on December 12, 2012. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Ve truly yours, James F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/amn James F.King,President ca Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 54375 Route 25,P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen Py Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyer �d1 � Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.Domino Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: DOCS r Tnc, �r � If 0JV ��11 Please be advised that your application dated Z Z has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of and your application has been approved pending the completion of t e following items checked off below. Revised Plans for proposed project Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) 1"t Day of Construction ($50.00) Y2 Constructed ($50.00) Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: $ BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees gpF FO(,t James F.King President ell P.O. Box 1179 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-Presidents d Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bereen ? Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer [+ ,y M Fax(63 1)765-6641 Michael J. Domino '.t yyo1� Southold Town Board of Trustees Field InspectionMorksession Report Date/Time: Docko, Inc. on behalf of HIRAM MOODY, JR. requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' wide pile and timber pier and install an 8'X 20' floating dock with hinged ramp and associated float restraint piles, boat berthing tie-off piles, utilities and ladder. The overall length of the pier from the shore waterward of the high tide line and tidal wetlands vegetation is 120'. Located: 33 Reservoir Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#9-8-3.2 REVISED DESCRIPTION AS OF 11/5/12 To construct 118LF of 4ft wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including two ladders and two outhaul piles, all waterward of the apparent high water line; construct +/-11 LF of 4ft wide wood deck, landward of the approximate high water line. Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 _Chapt. 111 _other Type of Application: _Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment —Administrative—Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: J. King _B. Ghosio D. Bergen, J. Bredemeyer Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Cantrell, Elizabeth From: office@docko.com Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 9:57 AM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: FW: Moody project Good morning Elizabeth, Keith asked that I forward Mr. Walkers email to you. Do you need anything else from us? Thanks very much, Cindy Docko, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Walker[mailto:acwalker(?a aw.dec.state.ny.usl Sent: Wednesday,September 26, 2012 9:20 AM To: office@docko.com Subject: Re: Moody project Hi Cindy, NYSDEC is OK conceptually with the revised plans,as discussed with Keith. Only minor update I would add would be to show the typical spacing between pier support pile sections on both the plan view and cross-section drawings; it appears to scale out as 10'on center. Other than that, I would suggest including a cover letter noting any Southold "requirements"such as the maximum pier elevation above MHW that they would accept, decking material, etc.,just so both regulatory groups are on the same page. I did note to Keith that NYSDEC will include some form of a monitoring/mitigation permit condition associated with the construction of a pier and boat tie-off area over existing eelgrass, but that's more an issue on my end in terms of drafting the condition. Once that spacing item is added to the revised plans,send in hard copies of the plans and a cover letter to the permit analyst assigned to this application. Thanks again. Andrew >>> "officeCa)docko.com" <office@docko.com>9/25/2012 11:04 AM >>> Good morning Mr. Walker, I sent you the revised drawings this morning for Mr. Moody. Do we need to update the application documents with new signature pages in order to move forward with this project or just make the revisions to the documents and resend them? Thanks very much, Cindy Docko, Inc. 1 • Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com September 28, 2012 11 L r- OCT - 4 2012 jl Ms. Sherri Aicher Building 40, SUNY Soca°,ac'' is✓an 50 Circle Road BcarG of rus;ees Stony Brook,NY 11790-2356 RE: Moody Property, Fishers Island Revised Application Drawings Dear Ms. Aicher, Following up on some of our recent correspondence and my meeting with Mr. Andrew Walker and Mr. Robert Marsh, of the DEC Marine Habitat Protection Bureau, we are transmitting herewith revised application drawings for Mr. Hiram Moody in Silver Eel Cove on Fishers Island. These drawings reflect the change to a full length fixed pier with tie-off piles on the south side, otherwise occupying the same basic footprint of the original fixed pier and floating dock configuration. I trust that you will find this revision acceptable and accurately reflections terms of my discussion with Mr. Walker and Mr. Marsh. I look forward to your comments, please give me a call when you have had a chance to review the drawings and let me know if the need for further information is required. Your assistance, as always is greatly appreciated. Yours Truly, DOCKO, INC. f� lei B. Neilson P.E. KBN: tw CC: Hiram Moody TOS: James King USACOE: Frank Tangorra FILE: 11-09-2329 MOODY s » FISHERS ISLAND \\\ I�fn'` •�' SOUND n, r•� ® .i x � » ` 1 *�< c Rra16G1� / 46 7� �Y s :'Rnr1r - - SITE_, � 1��• LANt] / � C a rrzz pp 1 7 2n2, - ;. . s / ` OT- 4"2G�i / 3 x / ,1 x s CHART:123T1 GRAPHIC SCALE fJ/F PROPERTY of ..,.•i FF,- :> ;,, . . 800 O 800 IN -� SITE •�• +/ < ' NOTES ~M- PROPERTY OF 1.ELEVATION DATUM 15 APPARENT MEAN LOW MOODY .:...::� i I:- .•.; .1. '- .... •;' LOWER WATER(MU_W). f.' � I I .y'� . ✓: ,,. . 2 TIDE DATA IS TAKEN FROM 2011 NOAA TIDE "•` c.• , : ,::�...:.: _.,;i: : TABLES REFERENCE:SILVER EEL DOVE J � '` "!-.::_+� ,p ''' •.; : . ; .:.:. 3.PROJEGTDESGWFTION _ -'clb `.:..• .."...'y: ,.?l%W ";;.(�:;:�. . .:ai CONSTRUCT TL8a.F lOF 4-FT WDE FRED WOOD NEW PIER Z& .r1; S.. PILE AND TIMBER PIER INCLUDING TWO LADDERS OUTHAUL PILES ,.> •� ... ,:: AND TWO OUTHAUL PILES,ALL WATT]ZIA/ARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER UNE CONSTRUCT -^'. •:. .. :.•-o';-"'. ''' >''::,:: c.:. !::;',`'' 11x LF OF 4-FT WIDE WOOD DECK LANDWARD OFxk THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER UNE. 4.PROJECT PURPOSE .::.:>:��,:;:•:,'.:,` 1 THIS 19 A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL � .. . BOATING. ,.... `...`� 1L.;�•'i�f';1�• :^;- :',;,,. ,.. S.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT �I, ` N/F PROPERTY ofGL A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR . .:� . � �,. •: ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOGUMENTS.A O TOWN BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. .\a` G.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: NORTH. WEST: ' i R ONON H.It JANET H.HARVEY DONALD R CLEVELAND JR 2004 STRINGTOWN ROAD 77 SHADY LANE SPARKS,MO 21152 STAMFORD,CT 06903 PROJEc. Nr=W PIER and OUTHAUL PILES REVISED 54-12 DEC LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OF N.. I/ AL DATUM 1 PROJECT SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK L�KEITy y� WATERWAY: SILVERFRI COVE DFSGRIPIION DATE OCTOBER 14 20A 0 C f{ 1 cy .y REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. APPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY • D 0 � PROJECT DESCRIPTION ^� AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 4 REVISED 9-20-12 T.0.5. I - s 'r•+S;N > PROJECT DESCRIPTION IDOG KO• INC• .r. Keith B.Nelson,PE Q 0 S� Myst) ,Cr 06355 P 0 �ROFESS!0`iPV` 8605728939 FAX 8605727569 EMAIL docke®snetmt DWG TI-09-2329 K-AM B.Ndixn,Docks Inc. .9/24/2012 1156 AM rw,*2DA«y N o ,wvHexr rTiW IPVIqE1Wn191 HGHMlr'EVI CO+iws4n .ww�s J . SLOPE PROTY of MOODY `•�,•J WQ�O®9aNK 2,1 -17 APPACK � I IOGIION loci I ` - �PHnr LOFSPAFM EFiGPnSB1 6 I ini wow xM PFPRO#MTE LJ'f150P / 17 w BELT. .J WGECF -Ncy •tl / / M FloLg � 9 IiRlll(IHA — S�LVER EEL GO�/E DONALD R GLEVt3..4ND• WMOP A �._ mates A GOIV DITIOIV S A GRAPHIC SCALE V-30• 30 t5 0 30 SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER 011LLW) PROJECT: NEW PER and OLITHAUL PILES REVISED 54-12 DEC LOCATION AN FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUT HOLD CONTOURS$ SUFFOLK COUNTY.NEW YORK KEi G SFOTGRADES ADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE L. c, DATE OCTOBER 14.2on DOC K REVISED-9-2042 DEC APPLK'ANT: HIRAV"I F.MOODY COMMENTS ff PROJECT AGENT:��••��//I<SHEET 2OFF4 1 , aSwe: D�V01• INC. tll'l Keith B.Nellson,PE O o ►� op "tea-est �� P 0 �0FES51�T�P M» ,GT 06355 860572 8939 FAX 860572 7569 DWG 1-09-2329 EMAIL•dodwdP M.net Keith B. Neeson, Doc%o Inc. 9/24/2012 11.54 AM Moody-213 dwg N APPARENT Q MEAN LOW LOWER 0 9 al / WATER(MLLW)EL-.O APPARENT MEAN x —1.4 / HIGH WATER EL-26'z \ 0.7 x \ \•\ SITE y,,�� ppPROX1Mo,TE UMRS � Irl gtDR. PROPERTY of & OF DENSE EELGRASs d 2. MLJLYV i I 52 FT R i 'a 1.7 7 am � o.a x If P - LL y 1 _ . j, rNEW4-FTWIDEPER BE GINNING DECK EL 7,4* �11A3 - � I• u it -4.4 'x -2.6 IN y Y 9&xFT —SI OPE 1,o x NEW LADDERS y GRA-m DEdk n 10�FT BLt7R T ! II IIII 2 (I —3 x �1I IT 1.0 x �1 REMOVE EXISTING 4..7 END PIER EL SBFT ' 6-p PIER SUPPORT 6O SF WOOD gEGK I Ie t t �t -2.9 PILES(fYP) / f1 APPROXMATE UMR5 W POS 4 yriF7 } / OF SPARSE EELGRASs i' 3.9 NEW 1 AUL RL DIAMETER i BEACH OUTHAUL E(TYP) APPROXLIMI IMATE TS OF DENSE EFI.GRASs APPROK LIMITS 7 OF TIDAL WETLANDS /7 APPROIOMATE LIMRs OF SPARSE EELGRASs EDGE OF GRASS /7 FAL �.IV �/I1=W SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES CRAP,MC SCALE I'm 20' ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER"-LW) 20 10a PROJECT: NEW PIER and OUTI AUL PILES REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOOATION: RSHER5 ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CONTOURS& SUFFOLK COUNTY.NEW YORK P� F NFW SpOTGRADES ADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE KEIT DATE OCTOBER 14 ton • D 0 C K p . REVISED 8.2-12 H.M. APPUCANT:: HIRAM F.MOODY ,. TIE-OFF PILES 2' ¢ REVISED 9-20.12 T.O.S. AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 • i COMMENTS ff PROJECT DOCK-0, INC. ` REVISED 9 frti-28-12 DEC KeB.Nel WR PE O p O �869Z PVt4� SUPPORT RLP DIM. 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 11-09-2329 �fESS10N EMAIL--dockogsne+.net K&h B.Nell.on Docko Inc. 9/78/2712 1044 AM MoodyJ6dw9 20AFr� 4-FT NEW K70UTHAUL FILE -� DECK r - TOP EL 77-4-7*(7- NEW PILE SUPPORTED PIER WOIH I END DECK EL SIFT NEW BIN SUPPORT PILE TOP EL 4-FTiiBO�E tx:c.r:(f rry � NEW SPUTCLAMP a rd —Aki+AA.3.Y3s— CR05S BRACE(71'P) — IIID.s PILL D AT ND OF FIHt f rj r + �57AR5E EELGRP55o ,. l y'-, •' f:, S BOTTOM 5®IP8Pf5 f 1 ♦ i / j .�, END �/IE3W GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=10' NOTE DECKING-NOT CCA TREATED,HN2D WOODr' 10 5 O 10 MUST BE CERTRED BY FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL —LIGHT TRANSMI55NE GRATE DECK NEW 4-.r-T WIDE PIER EXISTING STARS TO BE REBJILT NEW 64N PIER SUPPORT PILE BEGINNING DECK EL 74-f7s TOP EL AtFT ABOVE DECK(IYP) M )QI lUM SLOPE 1:10 NEW RAILS(7-M *tFT END PIER EL 5.tFT� NEW L AMER('rM A \kL 41-7 +r. HLLW—� i vd+`.`'' ak v. ,. .+x. ti,]; s••u ' SLOPE rr."'4�cti`' F ' wk, '"'+ "APPROXIM4TE' ,rr.":<'"'• ' .vPRO 11 A.PPRof P ARSE RS LM 1 ^ •. A 5PA25E EES EELGRA55 I ES VIEW FOR CLA 7Y OFF PIIEPILES NOT RN PROPI L_E COMPONENTS. GRAPFMC SCALE 1.=20 ELEVATIONS ARE B44ED ON APPARENT MEAN LOW WATER(AMLW) 20 10 0 20 PROJECT: NEW PIER and OUTHAUL PILES REVISED 51-12 DEC LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 't KEI W y END VIEW it PROFILE SUFFOLK COUNTY.NEW YORK �P pN WATERWAY: F5HERS ISLAND SOUND \y REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. DATE OCTOBER 14 201 D 0 C K O xVi 9 TIE-OFF PILE APPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY .. W REVISED-9-20-12 T.OS. AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 COMMENTS it PROJECT 088 9 B. 2812DEc �OCKO, INC. A *�0 SUPPORT PILE DIM. MyoKaft CT 06355 O Po OFESSI�N WO 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 1-09-2329 EMAIL:dxkodanet.net Keith B. Neilson, Doda lnc 9/28/201? 10.44 AM Moody_4E-dwg 69%14/2012 13:33 631852 SCN£LC • PAGE 02/04 AVNk CortineJl Uzi ivenity Ems` Center MUM C operatly a Extension 3690 Cedar Beach Road of Suffolk Couiaty L South631.old, i 866660Xark 11971 f.631.852.8662 James King Board President Southold Town Trustees $3095 Route 25 KrL-Ilr PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 L� SEP 14 1012 Re: Hiram F. Moody dock application Scuthho!d ?own Board of Trustees Date:September 14,2012 Dear Mr. King, As per your request I am writing to comment on the dock application on the above references parcel at Silver Eel Cove on Fishers Island My comments are designed to avoid and/or minimize impacts to eelgrass(Zosters marina)at this site. You will remember that on August 8,2012 you had requested that I swim the site to look for signs of eelgrass within the buoyed area and together(along with other trustees)we confirmed there wits in fact eelgrass across most of the length of the proposed structure. It should be noted that this obsen ation was in contrast to what was shown on the plan prepared by Docko, Inc.dated 2/23/2012. As is typically the case,there are numerous alternatives to minimize impacts to eelgrass from a proposed dock application rangi ig from rejecting the application outright to calling for modifications of design such that foreseeable impacts are eliminated or at least minimized. As is always the case it is the ultimate decision of the Trustee::as to what is allowed and/or required; I can only provide objective advice based on my expertise. My comments will be based on my direct observations of the site in the context of what I know and have observed of eelgrass growing around Fishers Island(FI). As you know,FI is a unique place where eelgrass flourishes unlike most other places in Southold Town or the region for that matter. Because of this unique circumstance,given :he value of eelgrass as a critical habitat and based on the fact that eelgrass populations are in peril, It Is important to take every reasonable step to protect what eelgrass we have left. You will remembe�that several years ago I conducted a"dock survey"for Southold Town including areas in and around FI. As part of this work we discovered that,at least for the open shore areas of the north side of the Island,eelgrass can grow under docks If they are constructed high enough to allow light to pass under theni. This was the case for most North/South oriented docks along the north shore of the island; no observations were made of structures on the south side of the Island. A North/South orientation is ideal For allowing the sun to pass under the dock throughout most of the Cornell CarpoW n azar inion in Suffba County provides eq u Msmm and cmploymon[OppoMvddm. 09/14/2012 13:33 631852 SCMELC • PAGE 03/04 morning and afternoon while the sun angle is less than 90 degrees(i.e.,—solar noon). The fact that eelgrass can grow under these docks is made possible by the very high water clarity around Fl,and as a result,light penetration is excellent. While this was somewhat surprising,what was not surprising was that eelgrass could NOT grow under floating docks of any type regardless of orientation,she or water quality/clarity. This is logical given that the floating docks are at the water surface and as a result closer to the eelgrass meadows and cmnot allow light to pass to the area directly below. During repeated SCUBA dives I was able to find distinct demarcations where the floating docks created an unvegetated patch in an otherwise thick eelgrass meadow area. Another potential Impact relating to the floating docks and also the fixed dock%as the impact of shading from boats and the propwash caused by navigating to and from the dock. Boat impacts were less predictable and had to do with boat size and draft,length of time In the watm,amount of use and the way the boat maneuvered to get to and from the dock. one consistent trend was that the shallower the water the more the boat usage had an impact on the bottom and,if it was present,the eelgrass. Before I make any specific reco emendations it is useful to understand conditions at the proposed dock site especially as they relate to other docks observed on FI; 1. Eelgrass occurs throughout most of the subtidal area proposed for this dock. The only area not supporting grass was immediately below MLLW near shore, 2. The proposed dock orientation is East/West. 3. Depths in this part of Silver Eel Cover are fairly shallow when compared to areas with docks along the north shore c f Fl. 4. Water clarity in Silver Eel Cove is not likely to be as good as that along the open areas of the north shore of FI and a:�a result there will be less light penetration. Based on these observations 1 recommend the following alternatives following of the Federal mitigation standard sequence of"avoid","minimize"and "mitigate". Avoid The easiest and least impactful alternative would be to reject that dock as installation of this dock will result in loss of eelgrass regardless of how it is designed. The simple matter of installing pilings within the existing eelgrass will cause ass of eelgrass not to mention what may or may not be lost due to shading or boat use. We can gest an overall assessment of what might happen to the eelgrass at this site by observing the presence or absence of eelgrass adjacent to and under the dock directly north of this site. Unfortunately,this dock Hres not observed during the August 818 site visit. Minimize Require that the dock be constructed in such a way that minimizes impact to the grass to the extent possible. Unfortunately,conditions in the Cove as well as the proposed orientation of the dock may make the following recommenclations insufficient, but the following may help: require that the dock be as high as possible(see paragraph below),as narrow as possible,with the least amount of solid(non- $9/14/2012 13:33 631852 SChELC PAGE 04/04 light transmitting)structure,and use some form of decking that maximizes W penetration(mesh, grating or simlilar� ItsimW be noted that light pemamble materials for a� Aft Vatose rafplplaf bene li« dh ctly under the doc 4law the orMaRatl�diM.�1 ., ,riidtrflle stn ri'tradE. overhead. Ffoigti4i lllid'be avc Wed if at all possible and If It were posagfNr is&tdtte the venal aeeward of the existing grass edge damage would be minimized. poled regarding dock helpAtx"for fixed dodni deNetleet�(aAliiitt A . n of the"dock ded�should be at 6 If' b beyond the 10 degree lin* then dock a�131MI everyadditional 10 degree increment. Dodos wider than 2 m need to adrt844 mbo ffieir heW for ovary meter Incrementwkhh." Reference: Burdick, D.M.and Short F.T. 1939.The effects of boat docks on selgrass beds In coastal waters of Massachusetts.Environmental Management.vol.23,No.2,pp.231-240. MfdQtA Allow for the dock with the suggestions proposed under the"Minimize"alternative plus require plantings of eelgrass equal to or greater than what will be impacted. The area impacted can be calculated in three ways:total:surface area of the hard structures(calculated as if none of the structure allowed for il¢ltpelrat#aaien),WWI surface arca of kiwi hard vessel(s),or total surface area of the hard str=ires,vessels and likely access paths overeeisrass. The mitigation ratio should be at least a 1:1 of the iinpact area(calculated based on one of the above methods),but more typically the ratio is 1:2 or 1:3 ensuring that the lost habitat functions are preserved. The area to be planted should be as close to the impact area as possible at a site that can support eel grass,but currently does nOt ' I hope this information helps in your determinations regarding this application. If you have any questions or require any additional clarification on what I have proposed pleam feel free to contact me. Since Chris Pickerell Habitat Restoration Specialist Cornell Cooperative Extension Marine Program 3590 Cedar Beach Road Southold,W 11971 09/14/2012 13:33 6318521& SCMELC PAGE 01/04 SaffoBt County Marine Cornell University Sframnentd Laarning Center Cooperative Extension 3690 Ceder Beach Road SoutofSuffolk '~aunty tt.3L8 2, gg6pold,New York 11971 f.631.852.8662 �� II n c-o 1 4 2012 Telefax Cover Sheet TO: FROM: Giem 191au- DATE: FAX #: 7c7s-ter # PGS. (including cover sheet): Kms 4oxt uvTr --m i9cr txr f=-r- 7-0 7 Z F Cornell Coope nOw Ex nnxim in Suffuh County provides equal pmg=Md empleymm!oppwmnitim !ram Moody,Jr. s Island �33 Reservoir Rd., Fisher 8/812012 114 , #, Peer . R+„ Y .. 'r.4e is cash..•� �d -' t� 'e�' .. '. oryr.. h. DOCkO, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)57g-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com V .g ?I AUG - 8 2012 ) July 30,2012 Dixon&Janet Dixon Harvey Eeard 01 Trustees 2004 Stringtown Road Sparks,MD 21152 Re:Moody property,Fishers Island Dock Facility Configuration Dear Mr.&Mrs.Harvey, I was speaking the other day with Mr.Hiram Moody and we discussed your concern about his proposed dock facility, its proximity to your property and the necessity of tie-off piles on the north side of the floating dock. . I have been to Fishers Island on Monday July 30t'and reset the marker buoy for the northwest corner of the floating dock at its western most end. The buoy was slightly off position for reasons that are unknown,but at this point the concrete block is 50 feet from the southerly comer of your float. The marked position,when the buoy line is pulled taught,straight up,is the northerly comer of the float,so it is the closest proximity of the floating dock to your dock facility. Attached are copies of the application drawings which have been modified to show that the tie-off piles on the north end of the float have been deleted from the project. While this does not mean that a boat could be temporarily berthed on the north side of the float, it is meant to show you that the primary slip will be on the south side of the float and clear of your east slip maneuvering area. I trust that you will find this additional information helpful in reaffirming your support for the project. The floating dock location,as you probably are aware is somewhat constrained by criteria dictated by the State of New York and the Town of Southhold. We have located the float to be clear of your facility,in water that is deep enough to comply with DEC criteria,preferably 4 feet at mean low water and beyond the area of maximum density of the eel grass,which grows in a band parallel to and just off shore. I trust that this resolves your concerns. If you would like to talk about this further,please let me know and I will make arrangements to meet with you or respond via telephone to suite your convenience. Yours Truly, DOCKO, INC id Keith B.Neilson,P.E. KBN:tw CC:Hiram Moody,James King,TOS FILE: 11-09-2329 MOODY N \� N r A tri ` FISHERS ISLAND / �, . ' ''�' o / �': . . . : (, ,.SOUND/ / Q) 0 o . a« R;1 / s ,„ Ate• FIEF-iEER'S 214 6, 6 SITE Q LOCATION MAP REFEReN� :. ::I 11 . . _ . .. F CHART:1= N/F PROPERTY of I i GRAPHIC 5G6,F HARVEY 800 O 800 IN YARDS �• .:.:.: ;: [ i...:.. . / / ..1. .. X. NOTES PROPERTY of (. ; :.✓' ` 1.ELEVATION DATUM 15 APPARENT MEAN LOW MOODY LOWER WATER(MILL". 2.TIDE DATA IS TAKEN FROM 2011 NCAA TIDE \\ < '•. TABLES REFERENCE:SILVER EEL DOVE. 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: .. `•/, .. ,p `: � CONSTRUCT 7121-F OF 4-FT WIDE FIXED WOOD PILE ": .....::...:-:.-...:....-... _ ......- \: P RAM AND TIMBER PIER INCLUDING FOUR TIE-OFF PIER,FF PILES. . \ INSTALL AN 8-FTX 20-FT WOOD FLOAT WITH AND FLOAT ASSOCIATED RAMP AND REST1ZlANT RLES,ALL ': :. . . . .. -•'•_.:>.y�:::`. .. WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE / CONSTRUCT It LF OF 4-FT WIDE WOOD DECKS J SIL�/ER " LANDWARD OF THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER UNE EEL - . � 4.PROJECT PURPOSE-- THIS URPOSETHIS 15 A PRNATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. ` /J N/F PROPERTY of 5.THESE APPUCAMON DRAWINGS REPRESENT . f''\� \S GL.EVELAND I A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTA4c PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION j \ Q •�� I I .. .'{, CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.A TOWN/CITY BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: _. NORTH: WEST R DIXON H.It.JANET H.HARVEY DONALD R CLEVELAND JR. 2004 STRINGTOWN ROAD T7 SHADY LANE SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES SPARKS,MD 21152 STAMFORD,CT 06903 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON APPARENT MEAN LOW WATER TfAMLW) PROJECT: NEW PIER RAMPANO FLOAT REVISED 5-1-12 DEG LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TIDAL DATUM&PROJECT SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK DESCRIPTION WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 r D 0 C t{ 0 r REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. APPIJCANT: HIRAM F.MOODY PROJECT DESCRIP110N " AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 4 t�OGKO, ING. Keith B.Neilson,PE 0 R P 0 R �' Mystk,CT 06355 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 OWG 11-09-2329 EMAIL docko0snet.net Keith Neilson, Docko Inc. 8/2/2012 12:25 PM Moody_1C.dwg N S Y azre PROPERTY aF s Ilpr �� MOODY -J s . _.�;�. n �•�� VIW=6 . (171 29 51 -44 m �vnn, Gf SPPRSE FFIfaRAi� I 2 I I�I� I b iAT� M�E M7 POST j JJ py/�Q 10 r ,•� m � / PDGPO�t41E LMR50F/ WVIF lAIInL -[.3 Wo�I� / / III, S•NOY llN i�7 BF>Q1 BYI Ofa1 FIpP flu ,uvrsacums — oaroKwnvws WNAIIJ R GL.EVF-LAUD,JR - _ / / E=XISTING / CONDITIONS , GR/Wi10 SGYP 1'_30' 30 15 0 30 SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES ELEVATION5 ARE a SED ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER(MLLW) PROJECT: NEW PIER, RAMPAND FLOAT REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOCATION: Fl5HER'S ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GONTOURS$ SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK 5POTGRADE5 ADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE DATE OCTOBER 14,2m • U 0 C K 0 APPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY AGENT: SHEET 2OF4 Keitfi B.Neilson,PE O g Po g P Mystic,GT 06355 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 11-09-2329 EMAIL dockoQsnet.net Itolth 19a1Gon_ Docko Inc. 8/5/2012 223 AM Mood,-28.dwg N APPARENT MEAN LOW LONER '� pP�P WATER(MLLW)EL=O.O APPARENT MEAN x -1.4 f HIGH WATER EL-26x \ \ 07x x 3.5 V• APPROXIMATE UMITS O Bum PROof moboy OF DENSE EELGRASS \ z.$) BLDR r � li 111 110 0.8 x 50:FT x -1.7 BLDR NEW 12 INCH DIAMETER S TIE-OFF PILE 0-YP a a NEW RAILS( l P) �R �nA3 NEW 3-V2-FT X 32-F7i RAMP -26 20sFf TO SPAN DENSE EF1 GRAS 51sFT y 47xFT BLDR I 1.0 x _ NEW 4-FT W)DE R<ED REMOVE EXISTING I 4117 SPARSE S � - x z 9 10 INCH SUE60 SF WOODPPORT PILE5 r*T P) DECK 4 I 20-FTx /� 2l/x, 2 _ 4.3� —3.9 NEW B-FTX 20-FT ry SANDY FLOAT with ASSOCIATED BEACH 12-1N RESTRAINT PILES S I L_UE R PPPROX LIMITS OF TIDAL WETLANDS / i EDGE OF GRASS / PL AIV uI�W SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=20' ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER(MLL.W) so 0 o 20 PROJECT: NEW PIER RAMP AND FLOAT REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOGAMON: FI5HER5 ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CONTOURS t SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK 5P0T0RAOE5 ADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 9 0 C I{ 0 . REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. APPLICANT HIRAM F.MOODY „ TE-OFF PILES AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 DOGKO, ING. Ke"B.Ne&gw.PE C 0 R Po R A� Mystk,GT 06355 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 11-09-2329 EMAL docko@wet.ner 1«ith Ne➢smn. DCIUQ Inc. 8/6/2012 1001 AM Moody-3F.Jwq NEW 8-INSURIDRT PILE TOP EL 4-FTs ABOVE DECK 07rP NEW FUCED PIER TOP OF W� NEW 10' I OFF ALE DECK ELEV 75-FTi TOP EL M4-7i NEW 8-FT X 20-Ff FLOAT with .__ NEW 5PLff CLAMP and CON7INLKJU5 FLOATATION 55 BRACE(" - - _ - - - - -AvVL3.121— /-ALWL 0.1B — — — `-MLLW 0.0 APPROXIMATE GRADE AT END OF FXAT I ' I -.BOrONI SEDIMENTS: ,- SANv&51LT l=1VD x/11=W NOTE RAMP AND FLOAT RESTRAINT GRAPHIG SCALE 1'=10' PILES NOT SHOWN IN END VIEW FOR NOTE DEGKING-NOT GCA CLARITY OF PIER COMPONENTS. TREATED,HARDWOODS 10 5 O 10 MUST BE GERTRED BY FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL NEW 8-FT X 20-FT FLOAT with STING NEW 10'TIE-0FF RLE NEW WOOD PIER STARS TO BE TOP EL r7-FTt ASSOCIATED 10 RESTRAINT PILES ECK EL 75-FTt REBUILT NEW 3-5-FT WOE NENVB•WOOD SUPPORT PILE 32-FTs RAMPW RAI CIEL 4-FTt ABOVE DECK(TYP) Hu.w--/ r r. S"' „ ' -T.�. � ";.' ,. �� •• STONESLIIPEY Vim- BGTroMSFDrIENrs ,., �. N:."^4,, ,..,DENSE EEL.GRASS- �, _. SPARSE EELGRA55 PFZO FI L1= SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES ELEVATIONS ARE EASED ON APPARENT MEAN LOW WATER(AMLW) GRAPHIG SCALE 1'-20' 20 0 0 20 PROJECT: NEW PER RAMP AND FLOAT REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOCATION: SFISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF IJiHOID FFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK U END VIEW E PROFILE WATERWAY: RSHERS ISIAND SOUND • D O C IC O • REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 TIE-0FF PILE APPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY „ AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 DOGKO, ING Keith B.Neilson,PE �c 0 R Po R p� Mystic.Cr 06355 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 11-09-2329 EMAL:docko@snet.net KeHh Ple'ilson, Docko Inc 8�5/LD!2 -' AM Meody_4Rdwy ' ii: i L"ui Z February 23,2012 To: Town of Southold NYS DEC,NYS DOS& US Army Corps of Engineers Re:New Pier, Ramp,and Float Hiram Moody Jr. Silver Eel Cove,Fishers Island To Whom It May Concern: I/We have reviewed the draft drawings title "New Pier,Ramp,and Float in Silver Eel Cove dated October 14,2011 prepared for Mr. Hiram Moody Jr. by Docko,Inc. and I have no objections to the proposed project. Signed R. Dixon H. Harvey Date April 23,2012 To: Town of Southold NYS DEC,NYS DOS& US Army Corps of Engineers Re:New Pier, Ramp,and Float Hiram Moody Jr. Silver Eel Cove,Fishers Island To Whom It May Concern: I/We have reviewed the drawings title'New Pier, Ramp,and Float in Silver Eel Cove dated October 14,2011 prepared for Mr.Hiram Moody Jr.by Docko,Inc.and I have no objections to the proposed project. Signed(;; c cl/��'u Donald R.Cleveland Jr. Date MaY 1 ? 2012 Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com May 3, 2012 Sherri L. Aicher NYSDEC Suny@ Stonybrook 50 Circle Road cu r2 Stony Brook,NY 11790 Re: Moody Property ID: 1-4738-04077/00002 Thank you for your letter,dated March 15,2012,regarding the Moody application for a new fixed pier and floating dock in Silver Eel Cove.In accordance with the information that you have requested we offer the following additional information. I. The street address, 128 Reservoir Road,has been duly noted on the application.The street address on the house is 33;however,the common numbering system based on the distance offset from the main road is the method of recognizing these houses for fire department and emergency responses. We have changed the application documents to reflect 128 Reservoir Road as requested. 2. Water depth has been shown on the application drawing as required.This survey was conducted by CME and signed by Mr. Dick Strauss,who is a New York State licensed land surveyor,as required.In addition,the information provided was actually more detailed than required by the check list because certain features, including the submerged aquatic vegetation,were completely outlined to their full extent rather than just relying on three transects,which would have left substantial voids in the information between the docks location and the side-line profile. I trust that you will find this additional information adequate to finalize processing this application.Please let me know if the need for any further information arises.Your assistance,as always, is appreciated. Yours truly, PKO INC. Keith B.Neilson,P.E. KBN:cb Attachments Cc: Mr. Moody Mr,Dick Strauss Town of Southold,ACOE NYSDOS File: 11-09-2329 MOODY n v FISHERS ;' n` S ISLAND ,SOUND/ 24 y, '!7 fe.sa �OUFVL7 r VV s � , 4 13 ?� SITE O13 2 �b.m r..La /. z 9 TOWN of n% � .��-OUTHOLL7 REFEREN LOGATIOFV MAP 237 2 N/F PROPERTY of GRAPHIC SCALE KARVEY t 1 I S00 0 600 IN YARDS NOTES: PROPERTY of - 1.ELEVATION DATUM IS APPARENT MEAN LOW MOODY 1 1 \ LOWER WATER(M1W). 2.TIDE DATA IS TAKEN FROM 2011 NOAA TIDE ' \ TABLES REFERENCE:SILVER EEL DOVE. . F / 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 71alF OF 4-FT WIDE FIXED WOOD PILE AND TIMBER PIER INCLUDING SIX TIE-OFF PILES. NEW PIER, RAMP INSTALL AN B-FT X 20-FT WOOD FLOAT WITH AN D FLOAT ASSOCIATED RAMP AND RESTRWJT PILES,ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER UN } `Y CONSTRUCT Tit LF OF 4-FT WIDE WOOD DECK SIL�/ER = LANDWARD OF THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER UNE EEL `- y 4.PROJECT PURPOSE-- THIS URPOSETHIS IS A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL . y5,5� V. BOATING. N F- PROPERTY of 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAJe f \S CLEVELAND I \ \ \ PERMITCONTRACT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION GONTRPLT DOCUMENTS.ATOWN/C(TY BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. ' • �� `� ` :- � :.,tt 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: WEST NORTH: : .t 1 \ R DIXON H.$JANET H.HARVEY DONALD R CLEVELAND JR t,.. �.Y — — C;. 2004 STRINGTOWN ROAD 77 SHADY LANE SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES SPARKS,MD 21152 STAMFORD,Cr 06903 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON APPARENT MEAN LOW WATER(AMLW) PROJECT: NEW PIER RAMP AND FLOAT QF NE REV sED 5-1.12 DEC LOCATION: FISHERS 15IAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD W Y TIDAL DATUM$.PROJECT SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK K TN WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE \c� 9 DESCRIPTION DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 9 0 C K 0 * = A * APPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY r n „ . 2 AGENT: /SHEET 1O'F4 w DOGI<0, IN G. 88622• ?�"/ Keith B.Neilson,PE Q p AO355 FESSION�N 6W 572 8939 Cr FAX 860 572 7569 P 0 EMAIL dockogwet.ner DWG 11-09-2329 Keith Neilson, Docko Incorporated 2/21/2012 12:09 PM Moody_1.dwg N D sm a r I'FlW4W'IDWSIWA2R I/,-��I1'' (HLWj60D AWA®.RIEM! HGII WAtER , 1-1A A SITE s PDrR PROPERTY of MOODY roP of BANK 2. APPF20K ri 3\\v\ dV e a71-41 (\ 44 -3' I 10. –PATH-*J" ®(£W LJ,E - .o, m l I/ POST 1In h tl / BRUSH 1,� E�aE OF 5^HIv Lll EH.GRA55BEACH JJ P�LOGATGN // BM DfdLL H01E-40 El=9. W .YR9p%lHR - / `�-IL�/ER aErPA.wart/rnt —_ _Y/ GO�/E / DONALD R CLEVELAND,JR EEL EDGE OF / / E=�G1 STI IV G / CONL71T10fV.�"� / CiZAPHIC SCALE V=30' / 30 15 0 30 SURVEY by CME ASSOCIATES ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER(MLLW) PROJECT: NEW PIER, RAMP ANO FLOAT pF NEW REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOCATION: R5HERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CONTOURS I SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK �P pNK he SPOTGRADESADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE DATE OGTOBER 14,20119 0 C K O APPLICANT. HIRAM F.MOODY L 1 '. W AGENT: SHEET 2 OF 4 DOGKO, ING. �Y 66692 Q� Keith B.Neilson,PE C 0A� '90FESSIONPV Mystic,CT 06355 R P 0 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 11-09-2329 EMAIL docka@snet.net Keith Neilson, Docko Inc. 5/2/2012 1:03 PM Moody_2B.dwg N (� APPARENT �nQ MEAN LOW LOWER ° W" WATER(MLLWj EL=0.0 APPARENT MEW (� x —t.4 HIGH WATER EL-4.6: 1?1pP� \\ 0.7x � \• J AIMATEIMITS InI BLDR\ \. \• .SITE O EELG S \ 2. PROPERTY of Bi '` ��MOZ9DY ' fir. 3t o.a X l x -1.7 BtDR NEW 1-2 INCH O ER )ET �I I l I� \ -a.4 x \ NEW RAILS(7YP)BAR NEW 3-112-FT X 32-FT:RAMP -2.s I !! TO SPAN EELGRAS - . x 5kFT �-FT: 47xFT BLDR Il=il 2 EW 4-Fr WIDE FlXED 1.0 X � �( Wyk OD PIER DECK EL 74/ OVE ¶pEC'K I 4.7 J 10 II OCH SUPPORT PILiEc(11 P) / I .Mti x —2.9 i ,--20xFT / W006 POS 41 —3.9 / / 14..j/ NEW 8-F7X 20-FT 7 FLOAT wkh ASSOCIATED EDGE OF SANDY 7.2-IN RE5TRAN7'PILE5 EELGRcS BEACH APPROX LOCATION APPROX UMTS 1=EL GO�/E 01 WETLANDS 4 EDGE OF GRASS 4 4 PL_AIV ��EW SURVEY by CME ASSOCIATES GRPFHIG 5GaF. 1'=20' ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER(P1LLW) 20 10 0 20 PROJECT: NEW PIER, RAMP AND FLOAT REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOGAMON: FI5HER'S ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD F NE Iy y CONTOURS ff SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK K T SPOTGRADES ADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE t?2 NpN N DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 D 0C $0 APPLICANT HIRAM F.MOODY Lu AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 1A DOG<C), ING. 068692',% � Keith B.Neilson,PE 0 �, p�FESSIONP�� 8 Mystic,572 8935 P FAX 860 572 7569 0 R DWG 11-09-2329 EMAL docko9snet.net Keith Neilson, Docko Inc. 5/2/2012 1:02 PM Moody_3E.dwg 0 w Fr 2O±FT NEW—64N.SUPPOR7 PILE TOP -fr 050 m 4Frt ABOVE DECK OYPI NEW FIXED PER 70P OF \VIOTH NEW 70-TIE-OFF PILE DECK ELEV 75-Fri- TOP a 17-FTt(rYF) NEW 6FT X 2047 FLOAT%ft 1��1177 SPLIT CLAMP and N7IN000S FLOATATION RG55 BRACE UYPI Ij /-AWL 0.18 \-MLLWO.0 APPP4XMATE GRADE AT ENE)OF FLOAT1=1VD view -\ NOM RAMP AND FLOAT RESTRAINT GRAPHIC SCALE V=10' PILES NOT SHOWN IN ENE)MEW FOR NOTE:DECKING-NOT CCA I:====1 CLARITY OF REP COMPONENTS. 7WOTED,HARDWOODS 10 5 0 10 MUST BE GERMED BY FOREST 57EWAR05HIP COUNCIL NEW 10'T7E-CFF PILE NEW 6-FT X 20-FT FLOAT with EKS11NO TOP EL 17-FTt TED X7 R55TRAJNT PILES NEW WOOD PIER STARS TO BE ECK EL 75-FF± REBUILT NEW 35-F7 WOE X NEW 6WOOD SUPPORT PILE F32-FT,RAMP RAjLqN r1047- EL 4-F-Tt ABOVE DECK UYP) PHWL f-7 AHWL— 4d ALWI;� VA TO MLLw--/ No EELORAS5 SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES GRAPHIC SCALE V=20' ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON APPARENT MEAN LOW WATER(AML:W 20 10 0 w PROJECT: NEW PIER RAMP AND FLOAT REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD END MEW PROFILE SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEWYORK A EI WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND DATE OCTOBER 14 201 9 0 C IC 0 APPUCWT. HIRAM F.MOODY Lu AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 INC. 6 692- Keith B.Neilson,RE ORP1111 Mystic,Cr 06355 860 572 6939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 11-09-2329 EMAIL dockoSsnet.ne Keith Neilson, Dock. Inc. 5/2/2012 1:00 PM Moody-4C.dwg New York State Department of Environmental Conservation _ v PERNUSSION TO INSPECT PROPERTY By signing this permission form for submission with an application for a permit(s)to the Department of Environmental Conservation("DEC'),the signer consents to inspection by DEC staff of the project site or facility for which a permit is sought and, to the extent necessary,areas adjacent to the project site or facility. This consent allows DEC staff to enter upon and pass through such property m order to inspect the project site or facility,without prior notice,between the hours of 7:00 am.and 7:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. If DEC staff should wish to conduct an inspection at any other times, DEC staff will so notify the applicant and will obtain a separate consent for such an inspection. Inspections may take place as part of the application review prior to a decision to grant or deny the Permit(s)sought. By signing this consent form,the signer agrees that this consent remains in effect as long as the application is pending, and is effective regardless of whether the signer,applicant or an agent is present at the time of the inspection. In the event that the project site or facility is posted with any form of"posted"or"keep out"notices,or fenced in with an unlocked gate, this permission authorizes DEC staff to disregard such notices or unlocked gates at the time of inspection. The signer further agrees that during an inspection,DEC staff may,among other things, take measurements,may analyze physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, soils and vegetation(taking samples for analysis),and may make drawings and take photographs. Failure to grant consent for an inspection is grounds for, and may result in, denial of the permit(s)sought by the application. Permission is granted for inspection of property located at the following address(es): I �lSLl1 Oir f4irLic I I=t,swC 5ia-oA By signing this form,I affirm under penalty of perjury that I am authorized to give consent to entry by DEC staff as described above. I understand that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Sect' ¢210 45 of the Penal Law.• dmosv, F. Maddy TF4, — 312.8/t%- Print fZa/tZPrint Name and Title Signature Date *The signer of this fomt must be an individual or authorized representative of a legal entity that • owas fee title and is in possession of the property identified above; • maintains possessory interest in the property through a lease,rental agreement or other legally binding agreement;or • is provided permission tout on behalf of an individual or legal entity possessing fee title or other possessory interest in the property for the purpose of consenting to inspection of such property. Permission to Inspect Property Application Supplement 12M JOINT APPLICASON ® State 9619-7 fwom)dp York FOR PERMIT " States Army Corps of Engineers APP�aakbapw.dr wq p..aaMpslr9dmlk lkll t. Fbrwaef a.fwbwraaoa. Aatl.M.IbrIMiMnb.rnatlad PrrpW ypaM abA 1.Chak pwmlk Wpaad fa: 2 R.ne aApp lI (Un fml na..e T.Nph.ap rhalla.r (dayklm) RYe Dept.a 111Calewv.lb. MR.HIRAM MOODY (928)80¢5994 13sb..m om bwwa(swwwswft) lwane Aadme ❑ Nw,% wail(Eaaradal rd FA) BOX 2119 ❑ Dods,'MawW"a"Wbm. pad Cale• star ZIP Car. cCaa+a WNIM) WICKENBURO AZ 85358 ❑ Dam.elf lmpa.Nlwd ahuchar i Trp.yw ID (a appaaf Is not w balhld IM) (ConsbucL Reemab wl a Reps" ❑ Frodra.kr Wa ntk Tkrl WaWI &AmVIIMft4ftw (dod as molly r apply) 1'}71 Conal ala I Coad go" ❑ Opa.b1 ❑t.w.. ❑MWdpay/GwwmwWdAp my LJo+ffY CalallwaollRlwa 0.Cwmrw b9- nclftuWARc .f WmW s m-omwwIM ywm"plald.AprkOarw Pw.on lydolll.eYll, Avr.Acanw pw.a 13Pokhl.wakrsupply Docko. Inc..Mr.Kelth B.NeNson,P E Tdaphor7 -893r (d.ytll.) 13 Lone 1I wase = Addl.N (880)572 8939 ❑ ARI. wv.ptdi as P.O.BOX 421 AqumkfnwI Canhd areas as Cad. Fish Oabd CT 08355 w Pmledf romw LOOM=(roes i.aauen w rrmm on batnctla 1.) NYaas..ao.wmswma.. Caulde TONVCbNft a Ta MW awJiwd skdc&dtA bwc (SWaOwsd Lwlda Umkr Watt SUFFOLK Southold.Flehem Island 1000-9-83.2 Look Lkaaa,ea.nl.f« loeaaeaathwPAWIkrAlflr Awa«Rorl) r.° 'h�"1"a«„a� 128 Reservoir Road (T9,8� IMAM) 06wk 66L) p"r olea. 13 Dods.hlaosaa wf+bWwa MONO ap Cad. 7.Nw...f ft. W VI.rrbee„lonwnaw walla at. (Cares w pram) Flahers island NY 08390 SIMer Eel Cove Aak.Mrk Pwk Aom" a.OaasauwaOn.d Yap[ Lamawl Cawdlaf.w ❑ Firms W.WId.%mo New London.CT-RI-NY . NYilai NYIRFN ❑ Wad salvo and Real www RMI LFflaalrPtla..W pwpeaw lCd.ewy a. alwekron I�kalalrYyaa.nwmruNwfn�m.paaLraarr.dwrywafa.«M WYkL.beW wtlOWGIIII WWWWAmmo Nmdwptm 81 ❑ ooaw(OmdwwFba) COnsI a 44L wide pile and tirrfber pier and Insall an 8-R wile by 20-ft."foot wfh hinged ramp and associated float msbaklt piles,post berI 0I pfse. ❑ r"0p'a' utkilles and ladder al waarwwd Of III apparent high(spring)water fns. the overall Us AmW Cwp of platr.. length of the Pler from the wds"shore MINIMUM of the high fide line and&W 138amm404(waw.aaru.a.dsrky wedand vegetabon is 120(+/-)LF. mscalatopall.cadHwba Act ❑ NfWmdd.P- (a) falser Nmlpw(.) tYEC Mp icAT 'ioNl`ra eeL US ARMY CORPS OF f71afNEERa PAW paft y" R, 2012 2012 fw11e.work s.pwa.Pl}ay pfyati wkdl ❑ 0 twuat►IaWSPaIM/APpaaaal nw bw...dD.kw p p9- h aapiwwaaa why work wa..riled woad pwmIL) Ya Na 1w weeiprgptN.e6.AdWen.l p.dw.L sklq a Leal pwm`1 © N a,� Fl.a.uab U S ACOE,Town of Sou f W V. a appel.ld k naam 0~,bwh mud oW dr appluam f hwaby.abm asllaaatlollpp«kbdmdkfaerd■aftpl.11wb auFMaad flr.wol k bus kthe boo Of ay knW.dp.wm beaaf. Floe daknl.M mad. .I pla8ll.bk r• dby mfaanlawwrm.wafkaawla 710aaam.Parol Lm R.alw,ft appeal amapr ha I.porubWV brae dram.,daao«polar aw an"liwnr.a,andbywlwlllrwadrwad aYka aldaspl}ddwwb.d Ilwek rd8~0kdalmdlywd. hw&%"dwalfabwewlbt a', dwnaa...f seraawrnot wolpSw„awasq tam NOMplalaLt k.dV♦wL Fwrlf lap,to U.aC.,Sada Ron aia.00aorbed.orwrftlrnol mol tlr.a Yw%wbolh rhe/ wagfyaa wakely ryalaa.oaloef4waw �b.emanafmolarn waaaafaealalkJols«kwldfwatadwaf, pP•a uP.nraWradwk,,A,* mora Data al Z1 ImsWaan of APpadm • ran Data of Dans REseT PROJECT ID NUMBER 917'20 SEQR APPENDIX STATE ENVIRONMENTAL XW REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Ordy PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION (Tobe completed by plicw or Poled Sponsor) 1.APPUCANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME HIRAM MOODY JR. NEW PIER AND FLOATING DOCK &PROJECT LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND SOUTHOLD Mmkoulfty Cowb ♦.PRECISE LOCATION: Shed Addes and Road InMrsecdonr, P 01,lh wt landmarks etc-or wovkle rasp 128 Reservoir Road 5.13 PROPOSED ACTION: © Now Expmtlon �Morr0calWnl dbrasm e.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Construct a 44L wide pile and timber pier and Install an 11A Wide by 204L long float wflh hinged ramp and eaeodated Moat restraint piles,haat berthing tie olf piles utilities and ladders ad waterward of the apparent high(spring)Water line. theoveralllength of the pier from the existing shore wahwward of the high tide fine and tidal wetland vegetation Is 120 r.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Inaa .35 arta U .35 aria &V LL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EMITTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? ©Yw ❑ 14,10 a n0,deacdM WW.. a.WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (am"r mwW r apply.) © ❑IrAmbw ❑cmwwcal ❑AWbdbaa pPwk/Foi 1Opan Space ❑Deur (daeaas) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal. Sweor Local) ©Yea MNo If yae. Mt aaarrry nary and permit/ appruvat US ACOE.NYS DOS,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD.BOARD OF TRUSTEES 11.DOER ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? 0Ysa ©No If yea. Nat seaway name and Pears I approvat 1 A UNoLT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATN" aa 1 CERTIFY THAT T7 PC-OR ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY MOMLEOGE APPkwd / Sponsor Name SkInatwe • Deur q,/1t1 r tl� H the action Is a Costal Area,and you are a stab agency, ctanpleb the Coastal Asapmold Form before proceeding with this assessment Peter Young,Chairman - Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 1 * Fax(631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., March 14, 2012 the following recommendation was made: HIRAM MOODY, JR. to construct a 4' wide pile and timber pier and install an 8'X 20' floating dock with hinged ramp and associated float restraint piles, boat berthing tie-off piles, utilities and ladder. The overall length of the pier from the shore waterward of the high tide line and tidal wetlands vegetation is 120'. Located: 33 Reservoir Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#9-8-3.2 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. osuFFa James F.King,President QV C P.O. Box 1179 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen y Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyet ,y }* Fax(631)765-6641 Michael J.Domino Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Zf5 �/9/Zor2- Date/Time: 0% 2e HIRAM MOODY, JR. requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' wide pile and timber pier and install an 8'X 20' floating dock with hinged ramp and associated float restraint piles, boat berthing tie-off piles, utilities and ladder. The overall length of the pier from the shore waterward of the high tide line and tidal wetlands vegetation is 120'. Located: 33 Reservoir Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#9-8-3.2 Type of area to be impacted: L Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Gd ✓ � Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 _Chapt. 111 _other Type of Application: Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment —Administrative—Emergency_Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: C Aj 6 7- lel-4- 4) JV2i /Z fF G �rn�ss ego M /,5' /6lyfKF e) 7rf'S+<ln.�'Ac BD ejy Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: J. King B. Ghosio D. Bergen, J. Bredemeyer !/Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by fJ`i��/ C Mailed/Faxed to: Date: gJBJj'7 i. Hiram Moody,Jr. 33 Reservoir Rd.,Fi- SCTMM 9-8-3.2 ., ., 4/20/2012 . . .. oAl r r ', ilk • 91RAM MOODY JR. New Ramp, Pier and Float October 14,2011 ►" A ►AdALL= .� a • : p This photograph shows the waters to the northwest of the Moody property in Silver Eel Cove. The photograph is taken from the beach looking in a northerly direction. The Dixon dock is shown in the upper center of the photograph. The Moody's dock will pass over the boulder in the foreground running from the lower right hand comer to the middle of the left edge of the photograph. Though eelgrass was observed during this site visit in September 2011, it does not really show up in this photograph. It turned out to be a narrow band, which the proposed dock facility will span. QIRAM MOODY JR. New Ramp, Pier and Float October 14, 2011 V. i This photograph shows the end of the wood deck structure, which exists along the shoreline at the Moody property. This structure will be removed and replaced with the elevated pier as depicted in the application drawings. The pier will come ashore at this point and span the upper reaches of the intertidal zone with five feet of clearance to allow pedestrian access although such access has never been observed at this site. • WAM MOODY JR. New Ramp,Pier and Float October 14, 2011 f� T x x � e r This photograph shows the shoreline habitat beneath the existing deck, there are no tidal wetlands vegetation at this site and really no vegetative growth of any kind. There are boulders along the shoreline and these boulder form toe protection for the bluff above and to the right. The new deck structure will be several feet higher than this deck at the shoreline landing point to allow pedestrian access beneath. ;Applicant: t *Ramp& Float" Silver Eel Cove '2 33 Fishers Island,Town of Southold 3Suffolk County,New York gLOLK _---"- Hiram Moody Jr. ___-- -` October 14, 2011 LgriMower ReefA .tTJ C14 NEW'jat K d I i R I � I ------- N." I LI 1{{�b�DUfnPiil�g _ IF I i 11 011 ID i S 4th Mplin 89 30 33 { 23 II I, _ -- _ 3 H.-wi4 N. 31 ff 16 S O U ih 7� ( ��� _ ,�1q meat ab- ' Harbor Sto . �.�* �:� �Or IS � M•Ima � VI � o Harbo� a �� \ �� 3� �i� � Vr moi'• 0 A. Silver Eej Yiov6ski, ot � ; U fi COAST Gpa4D �A 66 69 II �' Elizabe Field re\ _ vyc`,�s•� 's ISLAND — �� I 46M128 — _ —/ 81 9C K 22 QODND e 1 "i r A6, (33 CFR 325) EXPIRES: 31 August 2012 Public repotting burden for this collection of informationis to average 5(routs per response,including the time for i truch searching existing data sources,gathering mod maintaining the data necdernt,and and reviewing the collecdoo of information. Send . this burden estimate of any other aspect of this collection of infor cation,including suggestions for reducing this burden,to Department of Defewe,Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of of Information Operations and Repots,1215 Jefferson Davis Highway,Suite 1204,Arlington,VA 22202-4302;and to the Office of Managemerc and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project(0710-0003),Washington,DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses.Completed applications most be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction ova the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authority:33 USC 401,Section 10;1413,Section 404. Principal Nopose:These laws require pemtib authorizing activities i4 navigable waters of the United Seta the discharge of dredged or fall material into waters of the United States,and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this from will be used in evaluating this application for a permit Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is is voluntary. H information is not provided,however,the permit application cannot be processed ter can a pumit be issued One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and insimcdom)and be submitted m the District Engineer haviogjurisdiction of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned (ITEMS I THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS) 1.APPLICATION NO. 2.FIELD OFFICE CODE 3.DATE RECEIVED 4.DATE APP.COMPLETED ITEMS BELOW 719 BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT 5.APPLICANTS NAME 8.AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME R TITLE HIRAM MOODY IR DOCKO,INC. KEITH B.NEI SON,P.E 6.APPLICANTS ADDRESS 9.AGENTS ADDRESS BOX 2119 P.O.BOX 421 WICKENBURG,AZ 85358 MYSTIC,CT 06355 7.APPLICANTS PHONE NO'S W/AREA CODE 10.AGENTS PHONE NO'S W/AREA CODE a.Residence (928)231-1076 a.Residence b.Business b.Business (860)572-8939 11.STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize,DOCKO,INC.to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to firnish,upon mWat, supplemental intormation in support of this permit application. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE HIRAM MOODY JR. NAME,LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12.PROJECT NAME OR TITLE(Ser instructions) NEW PIER,RAMP AND FLOAT 13.NAME OF WATERBODY,IF KNOW(if applicable) 14.PROJECT STREET ADDRESS(if applicable) SILVER EEL COVE 33 RESERVOIR ROAD 15.LOCATION OF PROJECT LATITUDE:°N 410 15'27"N LONGITUDE:°W 720 01'47"W 16.OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS,W KNOWN, (Ste instructions) 17.DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE TAKE FERRY TO FISHERS ISLAND,TAKE A LEFT ON TO GREENWOOD ROAD TAKE LEFT ON TO WHISTLER AVE.,ALEFT ONTO TRUMBULL DR.,A SLIGHT RIGHT ONTO RESERVOIR, IST HOUSE ON THE LEFT. ENG FORM 4345,SEPT.2009 EDITION OF OCT 20041S OBSOLETE. Propocot:CEM-OR 18.Nature of Activity(Description of project,include all f 90 CONSTURCT 61 +/-LF OF 4-FT.WIDE FDMWWOOD PILE AND TIMBER PIER INCLUDIN -OFF PILINGS. INSTALL AN 3.5-FT WIDE X 32-FT.+I-RAMP AND AN 8-FT X 20-FT WOOD FLOAT WITH ASSOCIATED RESTRAINT PILES,ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LLv1E. 19.Profen Repose(Describe the reason or purpose of the project,see instructions) THIS IS A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. USE BLOCKS 20.221F DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20.Reason(s)for Discharge N/A 21.Type(s)of Material Being Discharged and the Anoont of Each Type in Cubic Yard& N/A 22.Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waren Filled(see imtrunions) ACRES or N/A LINEAR FEET 23. Description of Avoidance,Minimization and Comperuation(seeinstructions) PIER REPAIR WILL BE UNDERTAKEN WITH CUSTOMARY SEASONAL RESTRICTIONS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMITS FROM THE ACOE,NYSDEC AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 24.Is Any Portion of the Waft Already Complete:_ Yes -&No If YES,describe the completed work 25. Addressee of Adjoining Property Owners,Lessees,Ete.,Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody(if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental Est). NORTH:R.DIXON H.&JANET H HARVEY,2004 STRINGTOWN ROAD,SPARKS,MD 21152 SOUTH: DONALD R CLEVELAND JR,77 SHADY LANE,STAMFORD,CT 06903 26.Liu of Other Certifications or AppnovalsdDenials Received Dom other Federal,State or Local Agencies far Work Described in This Application AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL" (DENT.NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED Town of Southold Pending Feb.2012 Pending Board of Trustees Tidal Wetlands Pending Feb.2012 Pending NYS DEC Pending Feb.2012 Pending 'Would include but is not restricted to zoning,building and Rood plain penin. 27. Application is hereby nude for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application I certify that the m[annation in this application is complete and accurate. 1 C ttel l oesess tie authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duty authorial agent of the applicant IA-1ha— SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE FURAM MOODY JR. KEITH B. NEILSON,P.E. DOCKO,INC. The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity(applicants)or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in black I 1 has been filled out and signed 18 U.S.C.Section 1001 provides that Whoever,in any rsunner within the jurisdiction of any depamnent or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies,caleeals,or covers up any trick,scheme,or discllixs a material fact or makes any false,ftaitioar or 6audukat statements or pteser talions or makes or uses;any falx writing or document knowing same to conmin any false-fictitious or ttaudulmt satemmu or entry.shall be fired not more than$10.000 or imprisoned nor orae than five year or hoth. ENG FORM 4345,SEPT 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL UUMMUNNA►MC This Is intended to supple t ENG Form 4345, Application f�partment of the Army Permit, or the JointVplicatlon for Permit used in thA ate of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project. Any answers may be continued on separate-sheet(s) of paper to be-attached to this form. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT The purpose of this form is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic Information regarding your project This Information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared Incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application. GENERAL-APPLICABLE TO ALL PROJECTS 1. Explaln the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work. Construct 4-ft wide fixed wood pile and timber and install an 8-h by 20-ft long float with hinged ramp and associated float restraint piles, boat berthing tie-off piles, utilities and ladders all waterward of the apparent high(spring) water line. The overall length of the pier from the existing deck end is 120(+/-)feet. 2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners to your work site(if not shown on the application form or project drawings). West- Donald R. Cleveland Jr., 77 Shady Lane, Stamford, CT 06903 North side- R. Dixon H. Harvey, Jr. & Janet H. Harvey, 2004 Stringtown Road, Sparks, MD 21152 Across the street- William Wood and Wife, 207 Fern Street, West Hartford, CT 08119 Donald R. Cleveland Jr., 77 Shady Lane, Stamford, CT 06903 (Please note that depending upon the nature and extent of your project, you may be requested to provide the names and addresses of additional property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordination.) 3. Photographs of the project site should be submitted. For projects In tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, Indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photograph- was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site. 4. Provide a copy of any environmental impact statement, or any other environmental report which was prepared for your project. See attached narrative v. rvv w wrvrvwyrr wravwaarrvn VI alivr1raa/Yv0 lu yuY! Prupuawl. 1111$ O/scuaw Irv- should Include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternative(s) resulting in l disturbance to waters of the U States. For filling projects In waters of tliwnited States, Including wellarlm your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation policy (Le-. avoidance, minimization and compensation). Alternatives considered included wider, higher, lower, shorter and longer piers, fixed pier versus floating docks, boat lifts, utilities, the locations, use of open-grate decking, orientation of docking facilities and the like, all of which are discussed in the narrative. The proposed configuration provides for optimal berthing, minimal environmental disturbances and no adverse Impact to navigation or pubic trust access to or use of this cove. DREDGING PROJECTS Answer the following If your project Involves dredging. 1. Indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging? There Is not dredging associated with this project. 2. You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. If you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events. 3. Indicate of your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material (except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the dewatering and disposal sites as applicable so as to provide a clear Indication of existing conditions. For ten-year maintenance dredging permits, indicate the dewatering(disposal sites for future dredging events, If known. 4. Describe the method of dredging(i.e. clamshell, dregline, etc.)and the expected duration of dredging. 5. Indicate the physical nateof the material to be dredged(L&nd, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents If available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required. 6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.& hay bales, embankment, bulkhead, etc.)and whether return flow from the dewatering/disposal site would reenter any waterway. Also indicate If there would be any barge overflow. MOORING FACILITIES Answer the following If your project includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities. Boat mooring will be accomplished via the floating dock and tie-of plies set off the end of the pier as shown in the application drawings. 1. It Is generally recommended that any fixed piers and walk ramps be limited to four feet In width, and that floats be-limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at mean low water. Terminal floats at private, noncommercial facilities should be limited to 29 feet In length. If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations, please provide the reason(s). The pier will be Oft. wide and the float is 8-ft. wide by 20-ft. long complying with all of these provisions. 2. Using your plan view, show to scale the location(s), position(s) and size(s) (Including length, beam and draft) of vessels) to be moored at the proposed facility, including those of transient vessel(s)If known. A typical vessel is shown on the plan view of the application drawings. The boat will probably be a Whaler or other small motor boat 25 to 35 feet or so in length. 3 For commercial mooring sites such as marinas, indicate the capacity of the facility and Indicate on the plan view the location(s) of any proposed fueling and/or sewage pumpout facilities. If pumpout facilities are not planned, please discuss the rationale below and Indicate the distance to the nearest available pumpout station. Not Applicable - There are no pump-out facilities proposed and no fueling facilities at this site. Those functions are taken care of elsewhere on Fishers Island such as Pirate's Cove Marina or the Mobil dock in West Harbor, a mile east of Hay Harbor, or on the mainland. 4. Indicate on your plan view the distance to adjacent marine structures, if any are proximate and show the locations and dimensions of such structures. 5. Discuss the need for wave protection at the proposed facility. Please be advised that if a permit Is issued, y ould be required to recognize th he mooring facility may be subject to wave n from wakes of passing vessdWwhose operations would not be required to be modified. Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structure(s) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structure(s) and vessels) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessel There is no good opportunity for wave protection at this site. Waves from the wave field northwesterly of the site got through the narrow opening of Silver Eel Cove but are somewhat attenuated by the Jetty on the west side and the acreting beach on the east side of the mouth of the Cove. SULKHEADING/BANK STABILIZA TION/FILLING ACTIVITIES Answer the following If your project Includes construction of bulkheading (also - retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill, filling of watersJwedands, or any other bank stabilization fills such as rlprap, revetments, gablons, etc. 1. Indicate the total volume of fill (including backfill behind a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed Into waters of the United States. The amount of fill In waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide In tidal areas and below ordinary high water In non-tidal areas. The shoreline will remain stabilized landward of the spring high tide line where existing salt-tolerant species grow to maximize soil retention. 2. indicate the source(s)and type(s)of fill material. No material Is to be placed 3. Indicate the method of fill placement (le. by hand, bulldozer, crane, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required In waterways or wetlands to provide access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be filled, and show on the plan and sectional views. This question Is not applicable to the project. The foregoing requests basic information on the most common types of projects requiring Department of th rmy permits. It is Intended to o late or reduce the need for requesting addltidW information; however, additionawformation may be requested above and beyond what Is requested in this form. Please feel free to add any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate our review. See the attached LWRP and EFH Assessment worksheets and project narrative for additional detailed discussion EFH ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES (modifled 08/04) PROJECT NAME: NEW PIER AND FLOATING DOCK DATE: February 2012 PROJECT NO.: LOCATION: Moody Prooerty. Fishers Island, NY PREPARER: DOCKO,INC., Keith B Neilson P E Step 1. Use the Habitat Conservation Division EFH webpage,Guide to Essential Fish Habitat Designations In the Northeastern United States to generate the list of designated EFH for federally-managed species for the geographic area of interest(httpJ/www.nero.noaa.gov/hcdAndex2a.htm). Use the species list as part of the Initial screening process to determine if EFH for those species occurs in the vicinity of the proposed action. Attach that list to the worksheet because It will be used In later steps. Make a preliminary determination on the need to conduct an EFH Consultation. xid; w.,,,, � ^t',Y<.. t., s mhA`.,ta fn swu > :. ..�'*"i5t ..; UY. Is the action located In or adjacent to EFH designated for eggs? x Is the action located In or adjacent to EFH designated for larvae? x Is the action located In or adjacent to EFH designated for juveniles? x Is the action located In or adjacent to EFH designated for adults? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for spawning adults? x If you answered no to all questions above,then EFH consultation is not required-go to Section 5. If you answered yes to any of the above questions proceed to Section 2 and complete remainder of the worksheaL Step 2.In order to assess impacts,it Is critical to know the habitat characteristics of the site before the activity Is undertaken. Use existing information,to the extent possible,in answering these questions. Please note that, there may be circumstances In which new information must be collected to appropriately characterize the site and assess Impacts. Sift Chsractdristics C6scrlptkl Is the site intertidal,sub-tidal, or This project is to construct a new dock facility consisting of wood pile water column? and timber pier and a floating dock.The project will encompass parts of the shoreline,the Intertidal zone and shallow subtidal zone approximately 0.001 acres in size. See attached narrative. sediment The existing Inter-tidal and shallow sub-tidal sediments are fine- What are the he se grained sand and approximately 25%gravel with occasional exposed stone. Is Habitat Area of Particular The site is an existing protected cove.The bluff that surrounds the Concern(HAPC)designated at cove is eroding due to exposure to normal tidal and climatic or near the site? H so what conditions, despite the moderate to heavy vegetative cover. type,size,characteristics? Is there submerged aquatic There Is a visible band of SAV in the shallow subtidal waters out beyond the mean low water line as surveyed and depicted on the vegetation(SAV)at or adjacent to project site?If so describe application drawings. the spatial extent. What is typical salinity and Salinity varies somewhat seasonally but Is typically in the 25-30 ppt. temperature regime/range? Temperature varies seasonally from approximately 30 degrees In the winter to 70 degrees In the summer. What is the normal frequency of Boating usage varies seasonally but there Is regular boating access to site disturbance,both natural and from the other dock facilities In this cove. Most boating activity is and man-made? recreational between April and November.The Fishers Island Ferry land in Silver Eel Cove with 5 to 9 trips per day. What Is the area of proposed Approximately 1/10 acre will be directly Impacted by this dock Impact(work footprint&far construction project afield)? Step 3. This section Is used to ribs the anticipated Impacts from the proposed action on the physical/chemical/blological environment at the project site and areas adjacent to the site that may be affected. Impar " r�„ Nature and duration of It Is anticipated that the adverse Impacts from this project will activity(s) be small because of the nature of the work. The project can take place In as little as a week but will likely take a month-tide and weather permitting. Barge access will be at high tide. The pier will be an open wood pile and timber structure. Will benthic community be x The benthic community will be only marginally disturbed by disturbed? the marine construction barge and dock facility. No excavation or"in water"fliling is proposed. Will SAV be Impacted? X A linear bed of SAV, has been observed In the project area but that will not be disturbed by the marine contractors access. The crane will reach over the SAV to drive piles. Will sediments be altered and/or X Sedimentation rates In the shallow sub tidal zones will not sedimentation rates change? Increase as a result of this project. WIII turbidity Increase? X Turbidity,on a day to day basis,will not change significantly from existing conditions.(See attached Narrative Statement). Bottom sediments will only be minimally disrupted during operation at low tide because of the 3 to 4-foot water depth. Will water depth change? X No changes in water depth are proposed by or for construction equipment access or for boating operations. WIII contaminants be released X The bottom shoreline sediments and characteristics will not Into sedimenta or water change. The likelihood of contaminant will be minimal; there wis not column? Will tidal flow,currents or wave X patterns be altered? Will ambient salinity or X temperature regime change? Will water quality be altered? X Water quality should not change as to a significant extent as a result of this project beyond the low tide bottom sediment disturbances resulting from pile driving marine equipment repositioning and low tide boating operations. These impacts will be of limited duration. Step 4. This section is used to evaluate the consequences of the proposed action on the functions and values of EFH as well as the vulnerability of the EFH species and their life stages. Identify which species from the EFH species list (generated In Step t) will be adversely Impacted from the action. Assessment of EFH Impacts should be based upon the site characteristics Identified in Step 2 and the nature of the Impacts described within Step 3. The Guide to EFH Descriptions webpage(httpJ/www.noro.noaa.gov/hcd/llsLhtm)should be used during this assessment to determine the ecological parameters/preferences associated with each species listed and the potential Impact to those parameters. 4Ftinctionatanck{%��ueiwf � � � f� f7ilcrij)�hafif�lltygil�spGcfa�gn�ljfi�stdge��#bl�idli �: r Will functions and values of EFH be Impacted for: The shallow sub tidal zone and Inter-tidal zone are currently sandy Spawning X gravel strewn with SAV,stones and boulders and will remain so without regard to this protect No altaraUons of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed. Nursery X The shallow sub-tidal zone and Inter-tidal zone are currently sandy gravel and will remain so as a result of this project.No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat aro proposed. Forage X The shallow subUdel zone and intertidal zone are currently sandy gravel and will remain so as a result of this project. No adverse Impact to submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated where it does exist In nearby waters. Shelter X The shallow subtldal zone and intertidal zone are currently sandy grovel and will remain so as a result of this project No adverse impact to submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated where it does exist in nearby waters. WIII Impacts be temporary It Is envisioned that any construction impacts experienced as a result of P Po ry or this project will be temporary and not permanent. The area of coverage permanent? of the proposed dock facility is small compared to the area of the cove and of no consequence compared to the overall fringe habitat and coastal shoreline of Fishers Island. Will compensatory mitigation be X No compensatory mitigation is proposed for this project used? Step S. This section provides the Fede6gency-9 determination on the degree a act to EFH from the proposed action. The EFH determination also dictates the type of EFH consulted that will be required with NOAA Fisheries. MR ?, F eeder4 A4encVi4 EFN E1et rttt�itattorir� 5 f S i yv �K X There is no adverse effect on EFH Overall degree of EFH Consultation Is not required adverse effects on EFH (not Including The adverse effect on EFH Is not substantial. compensatory mitigation)will be: This is a request for an abbreviated EFH consultation.This worksheet is being submitted to NMFS to satisfy the EFH (check the appropriate Assessment requirement. statement) The adverse effect on EFH is substantial. This Is a request for an expanded EFH consultation. A detailed written EFH assessment will be submitted to NMFS expanding upon the Impacts revealed In this worksheet. Step S. Consultation with NOAA Fisheries may also be required It the proposed action results in adverse Impacts to other NOAA-trust resources,such as anadromous fish,shellfish,crustaceans,or their habitats. Some examples of other NOAA-trust resources are listed below. Inquiries regarding potential Impacts to marine mammals or threstenedlendangered species should be directed to NOAA Fisheries' Protected Resources Division. m or66(4d° *e" ,w slilwis itrow(tt db�ui d�icH ' Ita�l t ti til t(II .P o 8tsi (Ifstoth that dliruptlbi4ats wnih andtoaeggt"relbptnerdhahttatkN401111leurser�ir m 'epp � SndfOlsettiir +dt of mlgraUotxhfubt Pollock blueback herring_ rainbow smelt Atlantic slur eon Atlantic menhaden American shad American eel Phvelcal Changes,not disruptive American lobster Physical Changes,not disruptive blue mussels Physical Changes,not disruptive, new habitat soft-shell clams quahog Ph alcal Changes not disruptive,no adverse Impact Other les: 9 133 is=)alp JOINT APPLICATION • ' ® NewYDrIWA United S mty Corps of Engineers Ir�nr FOR PERMIT 4 laladwhint. grwaad dbtl,KdaembarA. Atlarh adddmal nlmwtlan as n.dad Naaar PddlayNyar4pa Applc b aged.'wd Panna o'apaiw Teapharns Number (daNI1M) t.Ch"k PUMM WOW ror. 2.Nenar otAppeaard WW hal".none) (92818845994 MR.HIRAM MOODY NrsDepLat ea,,wllrlll +CweerwdM Al"mAddreas ❑ ssaam 1310`1 les(Bad and tiara.) BOX 2119 Z 855358 C1N.1100bla W1111111xaes e(Eafca and Fa) Pap Ole" AZ Cede �] �•MoonnpmMadona WICKENBURG AZ (Conebud«Placa) re M an Inciv") ❑ Dame and lmpwndmMn s►uchm iTanpayar m (Y eppllwnt (CmMnat,RewnsbW or R.psk) ❑ FreaMaur Wetland. AWk t Y I*t (PhW*as nal"r ae WW) Well Wetlands I� Oar ❑ OWWW ❑Lewee ❑W"dpdb I Gow wwn W A90W Cossw Erosion Control PwnarhM- comas ry � YOU mgoYNeAPMUCmred Parf011 klafnnaxdr6 11 WIN,smNc end Reu.alkrW a a.fcf If applicant a M the« .Ma * ICmtaC Pa,eon TaWpfo Numbs (dayd—) 401 wasr o"alxy Condon'" er "' o` `«�� M e1"dao" ❑ ❑AMM I (880)572-8939 ❑ Pdabwwatarsupply MW" Inc..Mr.Keith B.Neilson,P.E. Malsnng Adis" ❑ Long IW W Wells P.O. Box 421 Code ❑ AynalovaP lati-Cared CCTe Om6355 ❑ AcandtireedCoMd Mys IC ❑ Fish GWW 0.proo dl Padlb Lo"B" )mak mosson on nail,s" asaAaarn 1s.) Tu Mas 8,cdW Block Amt Nuf alar. c01 nes. TowWCIWAoreoar 1000 9 8 3.2 Ws�oras^nrd eiMQes SUFFOLK Southold,Fishers Island (slash ow"d Lands Under WOW) Taleehara ..& Idewmal ❑ Leaes (.w a. Eaeeswdor Locdesn dndMnaebedw Re ad) (928)084-5994 dhr Red PMParIY InelW 33 Reservoir Road Way Easainanl0110111--wnd"a. Post Gleos obs, 2rp Coda T.Neared Braman We`rbo*( near near poled ao' Cables, etc.) NY 08390 Silver Eel Cove ❑ Dopb,M00nps«Prexarma Fishers Island (Construct or Paw) B.Nana of 1.1111411111111.111141111111Gusd MW L.astlan CoorAndsar (Caa Ad kwKhw`pars A99MY New London-CT-RI-NY Nyr" NYTM++ 4 ❑ Fndanstar Wadand.P«a+ _ mdmNnw« ❑ WIN,Scenic and R.gedimd RWar. P.proldat GeeC�eaWd eaae poW(( WAgMy d d,d IlY 04- a*P. �"der Type d MMMIW andald G.,A K St cars and work Am Dk,,W w:Need or PufW"Swved) Lake George Park cen.lnre.an Construct a 4-ft.wide pile and Umber Pier and install an 84 wide by 20-R.long float ❑ Delo(Cnneaxi Cr grew) with hinged ramp and assodated that restraint piles,boat berthing tleoff p uullt"and ladders al waterward of the apparent high(spring)water line. the overall ❑ �lF ) length of the pier from the existlng shore waterward of the high tide line and tidal US Army Corps or Enon.are wetland vegetation is 120(+/-)LF. ❑sedan 404lwaWe d the Udlad SWO) 0 S.W.10(Rhin and ffanars Ad) Nedorrwld.Nnnit(a) Idsn*Namom(a) Far AVI"Dae OdP DEC APPLICATION NUMBER mwwd- ser 1 . GwapY 12 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 0 ❑ ❑ stile LaMTO DiOar 2012 Daw 2012 PaaW Puede camwdd SXPW Yon Megan"ProJed7 (d yea PWM I 1SLM"Mmas ParmeI Alapsedlarn esa"sra and gal": (x Mry) aspWlaYmd why wodt was .tarred wNard parrot) Q Na Is, YYrr thkprojectRicluk"Addtlerd 0 ❑ Itym LNa U S ACOE,Town Of Southold 1�ak sue,or Lased panpbY Yes No Pipamm 1T. x appswnd is not flail asrwr,bola and sign gas dppacetlen herwl h 1.bus a tla had d my W_isdga and bell@. Fal"starenlarw"Ila Moa 1 hereby dnrn and ntolmstlm presided w olds am and ad 8Wbd nnenre err ere dmn dked«waked. an padd,.aN ere a Claw A mhdemason,pence"b Seca"210-48 d Ne peal Law. Fud tla b sad accanaand am harmeds the stale horn suoa,acdms. efwhoWmndw%wWbywM.ar .r..4adit.Aol"pmoddm'bW mak adegrese ldnnnBY In addloo,FaOar Ilaw.18U.S.C.,SaNm 1001 prorNes errshrd Mmol den damages and coat d � ar hatln IF as n epplks rAnyY aid vlikyly f"Wa.conceals.«covart up a nwAWW lack or lmmin fy mak" $10,000 of MWW,aad han 5 VW , or iN aWas,k0clon or noclul t Talk oafs 7 Z% ILSOWure of Appilrarrl a Tme Date Lt 4LSl9netlua of owner RESET 917.20 SEAR PROJECT ID NUMBER • APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEW FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART t-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by A plicant or Project Sponsor) VA �CANT f SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME MOODY JR. NEW PIER AND FLOATING DOCK CT LOCATION: SOUTHOLD RS ISLAND county Municipality ISE LOCATION: Street Addess ad Road Intersections. Prominent landrnaks alo -a wuvlde mao ERVOIR ROAD OPOSED ACTION: © New C]Expanalan ❑Mod6c3dW1a 9M*M RIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: uct a 4-41.wide pile and limber pier and install an 8-R wide by 20-R long float with hinged ramp and associated We float therestraint eraallllenpgth a pier from the existing shles,boat berthing be-Off P1188, lotre wateries and lwarard of the high tide line ers all waterward of and tidal wetland vegett high ation Is 1120 (+(-)LF. r(Fedwal. OF LAND AFFECTED: ulama .35 acres .35 acres OPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? ❑ No x no,dewiW brfafly: S PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) ��� (describe) ntlal []Industrial �ConansrcW ❑A9riculkrro PakIForest!OpenSPaaACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHFJ2 GOVERNMENTAL Federal. Staw or Local) ©Yes MNo If yes tat ageroy name and pwrf*t / approval: US ACOE,NYS DOS,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,BOARD OF TRUSTEES 11.DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes ©No If yes. list agency name and Pamnti / approval: 1 ASA R SULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? es No 1 CERT:;z NFOR ION OVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant I SponsoDale: 7.I It% I%— Sign L Si atrse H the action Is a Costal Area,and you aro a stab agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART 11- IMPACT ASSESSMENT ITO be completed by Lead Agency) A. HACTIONED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.47 If yes,coordinate tie review process and use the FULL EAF. B. IVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.69 If No,a negative uperseded by another involved agency. C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,t legible) C1. Existing air quality,surfers or groundwater qua/ a?quantity,b� levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding probl Explain C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological.histodc,or­'other or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered spades?Explain briefly: C4. A m c munitls existing plans or goals as oMdally adopted,or a change In use or Intensity of use or lend other neWral resources?Explain hrlefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumuletva,or other effects not Identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: C7. Other i Induct�chwgss In use of either cuantKv or tne 7e�wgVENA�briefly. LEhNWVIRONMENTAL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL AREA CEA? If a tsin Yes E]No E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? if yes ex plarr Yee El No = I I PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effectIdentifledabove,determine whether itissubstantial,large,Important or otherwisesignticanL Each effect should be assessed In connection with Its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probabgHy of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irrevereibillty;(e) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain suffldsnt detail to show thM all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequatelysled. If question d ental characteristics part 11 sthe chocked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential Impadofthe proposed action on do CEA Check this box gyou have Identified oneor more potentially large orsigni&ard adverse impactswhdch MAYoccur.Then proceed dkecllytothe FU FAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check tilts box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supper"documentation,that the proposed actio WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting th' determination. Name of Lead Agency ate Print or Type are m e Tile of Responsible Officer gn re sppx car in Lead Agency nor m nespon 0 i NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistency Assessment Foran An applicant,seeking a permit,license,waiver,certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subject to the New York State Coastal Management Program(CMP),shall complete this assessment form for anyproposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This fort is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations(15 CFR 930.57).It should be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicant's certification of consistency. A.APPLICANT (please print) 1.Name: HIRAM MOODY JR. 2.Address:BOX 21181 WICKENBURG,AZ 3. Telephone: Area Code(94)231-1076 DOCKO, INC. (860 572-8939 B. PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1.Brief description of activity: CONSTRUCT A 4-FT WIDE PILE AND TIMBER PIER AND INSTALL AN 8-FT. WIDE BY 20-FT. LONG FLOAT WITH HINGED RAMP AND ASSOCIATED FLOAT RESTRAINT PILES BOAT BERTHING TIE-0FF PILES, UTILITIES AND LADDERS ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH(SPRING)WATER LINE. THE OVERALL LENGTH OF THE PIER FROM VEGETATION IS 120(+/-)LF 2. Purpose of activi . FIN PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING FOR ALONG STANDING AMILY RESIDENCE. 3. Location of activity: SUFFOLK FISHERS ISLAND TOWN OF® 33 RESERVOIR ROAD County City,Town,or Village g Street or Site Description 4.Type of federal permit/license required:U.S. NYS DEC,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 5. Federal application number,if known: 6. If a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity,identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number,if known: • i C.COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either"YES"or"NO"for each of these questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document(see footnote on page 2)which may be affected by the proposed activity. 1.Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: YES/NO a.Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? (11,22,25,32,37,38,41,43).. .. ... .. .... .. . 13 IM b.Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline, land under water or coastal waters? (2, 11, 12,20,28,35,44).. . ... .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . ... 13 M c.Revitalization/redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1). . . . .. Q n d.Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19,20)... .. . Q J21 e.Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10).. . Q _a f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration,development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29). . ... ... .... .. . .. . . Q JEI g. Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27). . .. .. . . .. . Q h.Mining,excavation,or dredging activities,or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? (15,35)... ... .. .. . .. . ... . .. .. . .. .. . .. . . . ... .. .. . .. . . . .. .. .. Q JEI i.Discharge of toxics,hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, 15,35) Cl j.Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33). . .. ... ... .. a IM k.Transport,storage,treatment,or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36,39). a 13 1.Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4). .. ... ... . .. 13. Ir 2.Will the proposed activity affect or be located in,on,or adjacent to any of the following: YES/NO a.State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44).. .. .. .. ..... ... .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. ® Q b.Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard area? (11, 12, 17). .. .. c. State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7). . .. . .. . ... .. .. .. .. ... .. d.State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24)... .. .. ... ... .. ... ... .. .. . _ e. State designated important agricultural lands? (26). .. . ... .. . . . . .. . . ... . . . . .. . .. .. Q f Beach,dune or barrier island? (12). .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. ... ..... .. .. .. .... x g.Major ports of Albany,Buffalo,Ogdensburg,Oswego or New York? (3).. . . .. . .. .. ... . Q h.State,county,or local park? (19,20). .. .. . . .. . .. ,, , ,, i.Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23). . . . . . . . Q 3.Will the proposed activity require any of the following: YES/NO a.Waterfront site? (2,21,22). .. .. . ... .. . . .. ... .... ... .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .... .. ... . ® Q b.Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5).. . . ... . .. . . ..... ... ... . . .... . .. . . ... . . . .. .. .. Q c.Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14, 16). ... .. . Q d. State water quality permit or certification? (30,38,40).... . . ... ... .. ... .. ... ... . .. Q �] e.State air quality permit or certification? (41,43). . . .. . ... .. .. .... . .. ... . . .. . . . . . . Q 4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document). ... ... . .. .. .. at 9 D.ADDITIONAL STEPS 1.if all of the questions in Section C are answered"NO",then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. 2.If any of the questions in Section C are answered"YES",then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CMP,or where appropriate,the localwaterfrontrevitalization programdocument*.The proposed activity mustbe analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s),the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify,by their policy numbers,which coastal policies are affected by the activity,(b)briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and,(c)state how the activity is consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment,the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. E.CERTIFICATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMP or the approved local waterfront revitalisation program,as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made,the proposed activity shall not be undertaken. If this certification can be made,complete this Section. "The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program,or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program,and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program" HIRAM MOODY JR. Applicant/Agetifs Name: Address:BOX 2119,WICKENBURG,AZ 85358 Telephone: Area Code(928 )6845 DO IN (860)572-8939 ApplicantJAgenCa Sigmttue: s Date: 2,414/1_ F.SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1.The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State,Office of Coastal,Local Government and Community SustainabWty,Attn:Consistency Review Uni41 Commerce Plaza,99 Washington Avenue-Suite 1010,Albany,New York 12231. a.Copy of original signed form b.Copy of the completed federal agency application. c.Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2.The applicant or agent shag also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her application to the federal agency. 3.If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form,contact the Department of State at (518) 474.6000. "These state and local document$are available for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies,Department of envirOnmeatat Conservation and Department of State regional offices,and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. Local program documents art also available for inspection at the offices of the appropriate local government e - BV 510115 9 13 96 TAX ASSESSOJ&MAP 5 1000-9-8-3.2 S 1) 00 x ees.ae W 6 1]00 e-Is-oo s:1;o ° Project: "New Pier,Ramp & Float" 2 "'06 P��• Waterway: Silver Eel Cove s��Pa Location: Fishers Island,Town of Southold 7 Suffolk County,New York Applicant: Hiram Moody Jr. Date: October 14,2011 4�E. � x1n.w 8 NSERT a un r=leo ��0 m e� 4W pry O•B/ V' N 'o ''' 3,911c1 HAY HA 5 4 �O e� m • r ].2 z,um Y C 5 511 s.3um s e .6• IA tel 22.1 SEE SEC. No. INa }� L0•Im L9• Q t 21• .r UAM EKE 9/ scX O 22.2 ti 25.2 4\ OSi61Ei W., 5 9 l..• 2.s• 29.8 tl ].0• / I6 9' 5.6• 1, 2 26.1 ]cruel I e 1.2•m1 z, I22.1 0A 10� 14 0 5 ° Le° "Q 9 ).l " A ° 30 \\\YYY l.2•s 1� 5 I O .nM1 V., 9 U F 5 3 U.S.A. N2 •� 11 � � ,• w 69E 1 1.1• ,e g ,e u,won.x�1r. \\/\——w— ymm�wlnl Lr q+�..x orxe oL'i U., O = •n, ^'_ n 1211 2 �•.omrL Lr. — • ......e,q. — FO ° _ x,q G Siwwn u�4n MP...M L x,l,. MSi ip[ ..` E N : R,ve. 21.�' o-.x. 1z.l um o. 1x.1. 1 1.. 11 w.x.. 12.1•Im Docks, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com November 13,2012 Mr. James King, President NOV 15 202 f Southold Board of Trustees i P.O. Box 1179 s. Southold,NY 11971 RE: Moody Property, Fishers Island Hearing Postponement Dear Mr. King, Based on our review of Mr. Hiram Moody's property in Silver Eel Cove and subsequent discussions that we have had with the state of New York DEC Habitat Protection Bureau, we feel that it would be best to postpone the hearing on Mr. Hiram Moody's dock proposal project until we can bring the various eel grass concerns to resolution. I apologize for the timing of this request, but we believe that we will be able to resolve the permitting concerns of all parties equitably, provide boating access to Mr. Moody for his waterfront on Silver Eel Cove and preserve existing environmental resources to the mutual agreement of all agencies. Your favorable consideration of this postponement request is appreciated. Yours Truly, DOCKO, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb CC: Hiram Moody FILE: 11-09-2329 MOODY Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permfts@docko.com October 24,2012 Mr.James King,President NOV — 5 20'a Southold Board of Trustees P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 --- Re: Mr. Hiram Moody Revised application documents and drawings Dear Mr. King, We are transmitting herewith two signed and sealed copies of the revised application drawings for your review.Also, I have included two copies of each of the revised pages of the application documents for your file. Please feel free to give the office a call if you have any questions about the attachment documents. Yours truly, DOCKO,INC"3&A__' .e Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb Attachments CC: Mr. Moody File: 11-09-2329 MOODY • • Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com October 24, 2012 "CV - 5 2012 Ms. Sherri Aicher Building 40, SUNY 50 Circle Road Stony Brook,NY 11790-2356 RE: Moody Property, Fishers Island Supplemental Application Information Dear Ms. Aicher, Following up on our conversations, I have added information to the application drawings that show it is approximately 400-FT from the northerly property corner of Mr. Hiram Moody and the east face of the Fisher Island Ferry District wharf. This would situate the end of the fixed pier and the tie-off piles well within the 25% of the waterway width. We have also changed the sloped section of the pier to obtain greater clearance between the deck support stringers and the bottom sediments in the area of submerged aquatic vegetation. The pile bent spacing has been changed to 12-feet over the SAV and `Thru Flow' decking will be used over the SAV based on our discussions with Mr. Andrew Walker of the MHPB. I trust that you will find these revisions to the application documents adequate to complete your processing of Mr.Moody's dock request. Please do not hesitate to give us a call if the need for any further information arises. Yours Truly, DOCKO, INC. lkz. ai-- Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN:tw CC: Hiram Moody NYSDEC: Walker TOS: James King USACOE: Frank Tangorra FILE: 11-09-2329 MOODY Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet) : 15.151(+/-) Area Zoning: RESIDENTIAL Previous use of property: RESIDENTIAL NOV ' 5 2012 Intended use of property: RESIDENTIAL Covenants and Restrictions: Yes X No If"Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes X No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision Prior permits / approvals for site improvements: Agency Date X No prior permits /approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No _Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : Construct 118 (+/-)LF of 4-FT wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including two laddersand two outhaul piles all waterward fo the apparent high water line. Construct 11(+/-)LF of 4-FT wide wood deck landward of the approximate high tide water line. Board of Trustees Application NOV - 5 2012 WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA_ Purpose of the proposed operations: To construct a wood pile and timber pier for recreational boating access and stabilize the shoreline with cribbing,backfill with topsoil and planted with native non-invasive species. Area of wetlands on lot: 200(+/-) square feet Percent coverage of lot: 1 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 10 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 10 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling: X No Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: As Is Manner in which material will be removed or deposited:The only foreseeable removals in this project could be the existing pier, which is 20 years old, perhaps more, and in need of replacement. This structure will be removed by hand. The wood pile and timber pier will be built of wood components. This project will be built from the water using customary marine construction equipment,a barge, a push boat,work boat(s),and pile driving equipment. Statement of the effect, if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): It is anticipated that there will be no adverse impacts caused by this project See attached project narrative dock Town of Southold ZQ � Erosion,11 Sedimentation 8 Storm-Water LLOIRINGAtcer�IRun-off ASSESSMENT�THE F�ORM F A 11360 C) g 3-,1 STORM•WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -� -g-��n— -per � CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION rTEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? 1 Will this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) S F H Generated by a Two(2')Inch Rainfall on Site? —(S.F./Aan) (This item Will Include all runoff created by site b. What Is the Total Area of Land Clearing , / Gearing and/or construction activities as ell as all � and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed r�Q ' t- J F Site Improvements and the permanent creation of construction activity? Impervious surfaces.) Z Does the Site ru Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed ❑ PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPI'fON (P,avk.Aaasone Pag++ReeeM) Drainage Structures Indicating Size 8 Location?This ✓ Item shall Include all Proposed Grade Changes and Prn I i 118�r/�l F o �l 4f trstd e �t Y Pel Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion } f xx-d. I�e OncL .hrn b l (J l4/ Ln aUC1 t LK;--o� and sediment control practices that Will be used to -P r control site erosion and storm water discharges. This .y 2 (NA-kh n 6 r�)�_ al I item must be maintained throughout the Entire I ndrld c n 1" Ij �" Construction Period. at QjVV1ft& huh U-V-¢d 1W 4 Nil this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or Excavation where there is a change to the Natural 0-(-44W(eit L,U� Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards _ DD of Material within any Parcel? �l e IL F(_a n�(1!(.✓f L�- r t.-1--C Ctn/�d X rMiL�1 5 Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities 1 Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand r1 ❑ f t% isle tC4' (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? Is this Project Within the Trustees jurisdiction General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or Within One Hundred(100')feet of a Wetland or 1 u 1 Submission of a SWPPP Is required car all Construction acWabs involving sol Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more acres; Inckding disturbances of less than we sae that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes El — am pan of a larger common plan that wR ultimately disturb one or more acres of land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to L/ indud'mg Construction activities involving Sod disturbances of leas than one(1)acre where One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? the DEC has detertNned that a SPDES permit is required for storm water discharges. (SWPPP's Shelf mast the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas or other Impervious for Storm Water Discharges from Cmstmcdon activity-Permit NIm GP-0.10-001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Stoat-Water Run-Off El1.The SWPPP shad be prepared prior to the Submittal of the N .The Not shad be into and/or In the direction of a Town right-of-way? submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. Will this act Require the Placement of Material, 2.The SWPPP shad describe the emalon and sedkr eat axNd practices and where 9 PrM eq required,post-construction storm water management pmcdces that will be used andfor Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any ❑ ✓ constructed to reduce the podutams in storm water discharges and le Mature Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder compllence with the term and conditions of this perk.In addition,the SWPPP shad Area?pea retro Ma carr tnkMe the babnadon or adwe Agan.) Identify Potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the NOTE: if Any Answr, a IS outions one through Nine is Answered wait a ChockMarkMk r quality of stowater discharges. n a Box and IRS umcdon sib disturbance b between 5,000 S.F.a 1 Asa In was, 3.AN SWPPPs that require the post-construction storm water management prem iISbr-WaW,Grading,OmbagaS.Erosbn Control Plea b RpWnd the of component shed be prepared by a qualified Design PrOfeeakxrel Licensed in New Vori, Sout hand and Must be Subddpetl bhNovbw'Pdwlo Inuadds of'Aoy Bdldkg Para. that is knowledgeable in the ptnctples and practices of Stam Water Management (NOTE: A Chad,Mak(�)amt«Anne for"0 t, '4 RagJ a CaffOm Pppkelk r) STATE OF NEW-tORK, COUNTY OF...YVA A?.l.. . ........SS NOV - 5 2012 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ming drily swoon,deposes and'says[hat he/she_Is the applicant foY Permit, (Name of Ind"ail signing Document) }� And that he/she is the ..................................... :F^... Own,,Contrtcbr,Agent.CarPau,te g0car,ele.j�• Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;thai all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief-,and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me is; ..................i-25-. ...............day of�.'Srf'.T...................... ,20.1.s;2— Notary Public: ... .......... � bZ�.............. (Sgnature of Applicant) FORM - 0 I 0 PROJECT ID NUMBER • 61720 • SEOR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1.APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Hiram Moody Jr. New Pier and Outhaul Piles &PROJECT LOCATION: Fishers Island Suffolk Municipality County 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections, Prominent landmarks etc -or Provide maD 33 Reservoir Road 5.IS PROPOSED ACTION: 12 New ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Construct 118 (+/-)LF of 4-FT wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including two ladders and two outhaul piles, all waterward of the apparent high water line. Construct 11(+/-) LF 4-FT wide wood deck, landward of the approximate high tide water line. 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially .35 acres Ultimately acres S.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? ®Yes ❑ No If no,describe briefly: - ;n NOV - 5 2012 9.WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) , RResidential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ElAgriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space [:]Other (describe) i 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) WYes ❑No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? 11 Yes ®No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? es No 1 CERTIFY THAT /T/iE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW,LE,I�G,E Applicant / Sponsor Name/ l'Y�✓� /vksead Signature -1 ac Ute— - I � If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment Reset Town of Southold • LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non-supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office,. the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION NOV - 5 2012 SCTM# 1000—09—9—27.4 PROJECT NAME: New Pier and Outhaul Piles The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board _ Planning Board Building Dept. Board of Trustees X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency(e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Nature and extent of action: Construct 118 (+/-) LF of 4-ft wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including two ladders and two outhaul piles all waterward of the apparent high water line. Construct 11(+/-)LF of 4-FT wide wood deck landward of the approximate high water line. 1 Location of action Property located on 33 Remo Road Site acreage: Parcel = .35 Acres Present Land use: Residential Present Zoning Classification: Residential 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: a) Name of applicant: Hiram Moody Jr. b) Mailing Address: Box 2119, Wickenbure, AZ 85358 c) Telephone number: Area Code (928) 684-5944 d) Application number, if any Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X No_ If yes, which state or federal Agency? US ACOE, NYS DEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III – Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes —No _Not Applicable These dock modifications makes appropriate use of an existing waterfront site and complies with environmental design factors published by the NYS DEC and the DOS Coastal Management Program Southold Local Law No. 6, 2004 and the Southold LWRP. The pier will be built to a 4- foot deck height over the bottom sediments until passing the apparent mean low water line. Rails will be 42 inches above the deck. There will be no impairment of waterflow, navigation or public access. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III–Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III–Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria _ Yes _No X Not Applicable 2 The only portion of the proposAftvork visible to any extent is the colauction of a wood timber and pile supported pier and ouiMl piles. The only land side visual ac ss affected by this proiect is at the applicant's site the Ferry District property across the cove and immediate neighbors in this small cove, which is high terrain lined by trees. The facility will be more visible through the leafless trees, in fall, winter, and early spring from the road. The dock's site will be visible from the water only when directly north of the line of the cove. The size of pile's diameters are limited based on the Town of Southold design requirements. A pier for private recreational boating off residential property in an"adiacent area" is a compatible use. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable These proposed dock modifications will take place in Silver Eel Cove and is acknowledged to be in a flood-prone area; there is wave exposure at this site. The new pier will be designed to accommodate complete submersion and resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic uplift pressures due to flooding. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable This proiect will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. XYes _ No Not Applicable This proiect is consistent with this policy because it proposes the elevation of the pier is at an acceptable height above the bottom sediments through which adiacent tidal wetlands vegetation may spread, the dock site. The NYS DEC prepared a study showing that the proposed pressure- treated Southern Pine timber products construction materials are suitable for this type of proiect in this location, except for decking which will be of untreated woods or composite (or plastic) materials. The configuration shown on the drawings provides an optimum balance between acceptable design and access standards without depriving the wetlands vegetation the opportunity to spread. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this proiect. No emissions will be generated by the dock facility. 3 Policy 8. Minimize environqNal degradation in Town of Sout4b from solid waste and hazardous substances and was1W. See LWRP Section III — Policies, ages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this Project. The pressure- treated wood trimmings from the dock construction will be collected and disposed of in accordance with current regulations so as to minimize any harmful affect. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This Proiect is being built emanating from Private land. The public trust lands and waters constitutes the area between the mean high water line and mean low water line and the resources are from the high tide line,out. These environmental resources are being protected by the suitable alignment and height design standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the construction of the pier and outhaul piles all waterward above the apparent high water line are not likely to influence or change this fact. WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This project is to build a new pier and outhaul piles for water-dependent, recreational boating. This usage is defined as water-dependent in the LWRP. The pier will Provide for recreational boating and boat transportation access to the Island or the mainland. The pier will provide access without adverse environmental impacts and while protecting existing habitat and limited resources. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for commercial fishing or shellfish industries or enterprises. 4 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action NES'PIER AND OUTHAUL PILES Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 33 RESERVOIR ROAD,FISHERS ISLAND Name of Applicant/Sponsor MR.HIRAM MOODY,JR. Address P.O. BOX 2119 City/PO WICKENBURG State AZ Zip Code 85358 Business Telephone 928-231-1076 Name of Owner(if different) Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: CONSTRUCT 118(+/-)LF OF 4-FT WIDE FIXED WOOD PILE AND TIMBER PIER INCLUDING TWO LADDERS AND TWO OUTHAUL PILES,ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE.CONSTRUCT 1I(+/-)LF OF 4-FT WIDE WOOD DECK,LANDWARD OF THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER LINE. NOV - 5 2012 Page 2 of 21 AWOOD PIER AND FLOATING DRK PROPERTY OF HIRAM MOODY 33 RESERVOIR ROAD,FISHERS ISLAND NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FEBRUARY 2012 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Moody's own parcel 1000-9-8-3.2 off Reservoir Road located near the south end of the Silver Eel Cove on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel earthen materials and moderately covered with trees and understory along the shore. The frontage of the property is approximately 30 feet along Silver Eel Cove abutted by Donald R. Cleveland, Jr. to the west and across the street and R. Dixon H. Harvey, Jr. and Janet H. Harvey to the north side and William Wood and Wife also across the street. The waterfront consists of a steep bank to a stone and gravel shoreline with small sporadic spartina alterniflora and patens growth areas and either side of an old, long-standing, wood post supported timber pier. It is the Moody's desire to build a wood timber and pile supported pier and two outhaul boat tie-offs, utilities and ladders all waterward of the apparent high water line. The new pier will be at an elevation of 6 feet and crossing over the intertidal zone at a minimum height of five feet above the bottom sediments. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold's, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Section 661 of the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation regulations for Tidal Wetlands. SEQUENCE OF WORK As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to construct a fixed wood pile and timber pier in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that the structures will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine dock contractor will arrive by barge with barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the new landside end of the pier and proceeding waterward to shore at roughly 10-foot intervals. These piles will be driven by double- acting air powered hammer to a bearing resistance of approximately 20 tons. This generally results in about ten feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Pier support piles will be 10-inch nominal diameter measured at 3 feet from the butt; outhaul piles will be 12-inch diameter. 1 0 • ➢ After the piles are installed, split caps (also known as split clamps) consisting of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers ranging from 3 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile pair or "bent". Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, four runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to provide security against uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. The stringers will run level at an elevation of 5 feet until they reach a point 5 feet above the existing bottom sediments and then slope upward at 1 foot vertically per 10 feet horizontally, more or less paralleling as closely as possible, the slope of the existing inter-tidal zone until reaching an elevation of the patio. At this point, the decking will level off and run straight to the shore landing. ➢ After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine but untreated fir, oak, cedar or it could be "Timber Tech" or similar plastic composite material with the rough side mounted up. If plastic is used, it will be gray, brown, or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing stainless steel flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a 1/d'(+/-) gap between members. ➢ The alignment of the pier will be perpendicular to shore throughout its length. ➢ The pier support piles will extend 42 inches above the deck surface. Because of the walkway height, the piles will provide the attachment point for horizontal rail members mounted to the piles. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boats may be powered during tie-ups. In addition, the water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the float or end of the pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have a coiling arm for storage of the hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low-intensity lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the walking surface. This system will be manually controlled so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. 2 0 0 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of construction operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, CCA pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles with new framing of the same materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's with two 3/d' bolts or one F bolt per connection. This dock facility is a fixed, pile-supported timber pier and therefore does not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels. In addition, it does not present an adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure might be flooded. The structure timber materials are specifically grown for this purpose and represent the standard of the industry. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even incident waves at higher tide elevations. 3. It is respectfully requested that the use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers be approved for this project. 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. 5. The 15-foot property line offset clearance specified in this paragraph will be an issue because of the narrow frontage of the lot. This project has been laid out to make reasonable use of a small cove and reaches adequate water depth yet 3 maintainsluate clearance from existing structu*d the likely area of new structures o1�'ddjacent properties. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking other than the tops of piles, power post, lights and railing nor are any planned at this time. 8. There is no room for a five-foot passage way on the upland to get around this pier and so access ability will be retained by keeping the pier high enough to allow foot traffic to pass beneath the structure. There is little room to walk along the narrow shoreline between the house and water at low tide; foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all. NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands Regulations—Sections 661.5 and 661.9 This project represents the construction of a new dock facility at the Moody property at the far south end of Silver Eel Cove. The dock facilities to be built include a pier and pier landing over the intertidal zone. The two outhaul piles will help hold the boat in place as shown in the application drawings. The wetland vegetation in the vicinity of the dock site does consist of isolated growth areas and does not constitute a "wetland"; the dock site is an "adjacent area". Piers for recreational boating at residential properties on the waterfront are considered to be generally compatible use in an adjacent area(AA) with a permit being required under Section 661.5 (b) (1), 15 and 24. Under Section 661.9, the standards for issuance of permits of NYS DEC regulations, the following are considered to be pertinent considerations. ➢ The policies are created to preserve and protect tidal wetlands and prevent their despoliation and destruction. Regulated activities will not have an undo adverse impact on the present or potential value of the affected tidal wetlands. Sporadic clumps of tidal wetlands vegetation does exist in the vicinity of the dock site at the toe of the bank interface between the existing stone seawall and the exposed rock-covered, sandy bottom sediments in the intertidal zone. This spartina patens vegetation however, does not constitute a tidal wetlands and, in any case, the proposed dock facility is clear of it. This dock facility construction project is compatible with public health and welfare policies of the State. ➢ The project complies with development restrictions contained in Section 661.6. Furthermore, the project is a waterfront dock facility structure and is compatible with the use of the site, zoning, and the long-standing use along the waterfront. ➢ This project will not have an undo or adverse impact on the present or potential value of nearby tidal wetlands vegetation. Town of Southold—Local Waterfront Revitalization Program These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to 4 this application and ther for consistency associated with thoject is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 —Water Dependent Uses —This project is to construct a fully functional water dependent use, a docking facility for recreational boating at this site. Policy 5 — Use of ExistingDeveloped Shorefront —This project will be primarily to build a pier to a logical shoreward point of origin, the existing pier (which will be replaced) on the westerly side of the home, elevated well above sensitive habitat or tidal wetlands and make it safe and reliably usable in all weather conditions. Policy? — Significant Fish &Wildlife Habitat—Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier's shore point of beginning will be at the toe of the steep bank with an initial landing for the stair and then a level segment to the ramp landing, with five feet of height will be maintained above bottom sediments between the mean high and mean low water lines. Policy 8 — Protection & Preservation of Habitat— Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its minimal configuration consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold. The pier alignment has been laid out to suit the shoreline terrain and characteristics of the cove. The landside end of the pier is elevated as much as possible to allow sunlight to reach the bottom sediments. This is, however, a shaded shoreline in Silver Eel Cove. Policy 11 — Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The shoreline is shaded by the trees from the east and south. The pier construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above by alignment, light transmissive deck material, and elevation. The point of landfall is an existing pier beneath, trees on the steep bank. The higher end of the pier will cross will above the small fringe growth and the narrower hinged ramp will span submerged aquatic vegetation in the shallow sub-tidal zone where the dock facility is to be located. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding - This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier that will in no way adversely affect water flow and circulation or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence on those flood levels. Policy 15 — No Dredging-= Dredging is not required in this project. The pier has been laid out and configured to avoid dredging requirements. The water in this cove does get appreciably deeper further out to the north. The pier is of adequate length to reach 4 feet of water and will not exceed the "25% width of waterway criteria"(US ACOE), more restrictive then the Trustee's 33% criteria. Policy 19 — Impact on Public Access —Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site. The intertidal zone hosts two small tidal wetlands fringe growth areas and the shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. Thus, public access to the public trust lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. 5 Policy 20 — Public Trus!iloppatibility with Existing Ad'oinin erties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibilitylM borders and existing adjoining prop . ies and land uses has also been considered in this project. This pier will not interfere with any existing or possible future facilities on immediately adjoining properties. This dock facility is situated and configured within the 25% of the waterway width from shore (US ACOE criteria), which is more restrictive than the Trustee's 33% criteria. Policy 21 — Water Dependent Recreation — This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. The dock system will be used for recreational boating and water recreation. Policy 24—Scenic Resources, Impairment or Loss -This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The construction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier, will represent new encroachment or structure but one which will not create a loss of scenic resources below the horizon. The elevated inboard section will be largely obscured by the tree growth on the site on the bank and the other dock facilities in this cove. Policy 25 — Enhance Overall Scenic Quality - The new dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — It is acknowledged that the Sporadic fringe growth areas of spartina alterniflora along the shorefront is a valuable, though extremely limited, resource. The existing fringe growth and patches of spartina are certainly not acting as a marsh nor do they create a substantial amount of habitat but nonetheless, they will not physically be disturbed and the pier will remain in the footprint of the long-standing deck so as not to move closer to the sporadic clumps. The raised height of the pier should allow the continued health of the spartina fringe marsh adjacent to the wood pier. SUMMARY This project represents a new fixed pier and outhaul piles for recreational boating access for the Moody property on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC, and DOS and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, Town of Southold Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and is a presumptively compatible use under NYS DEC Regulations Part 661; its approval is respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. 12,J Keith B. Neilson, P.E. 6 a Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com August 22, 2012 Mr. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: Moody Property, Fishers Island Hearing Postponement Dear Mr. King, Based on our review of your findings of August 80'during the site visit to Mr. Hiram Moody's property in Silver Eel Cove and subsequent discussions that we have had with the state of New York DEC Habitat Protection Bureau,we feel that it would be best to postpone the hearing on Mr. Hiram Moody's dock proposal project until we can bring the various concern to resolution. I apologize for the timing of this request, but we believe that we will be able to resolve the concerns of all parties equitably, provide boating access to Mr. Moody for his waterfront on Silver Eel Cove and preserve existing environmental resources to the mutual agreement of all agencies. Your favorable consideration of this postponement request is appreciated. Yours Truly, DOCKO, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. CC: Hiram Moody FILE: 11-09-2329 MOODY Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permlts@docko.com August 15, 2012 DFRAUG 'l 6 2012� VE D Mr. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees Southhold Tom P.O. Box 1179 Board of Trustees Southold,NY 11971 RE: Moody Property, Fishers Island Concept Plans Dear Mr. King, Following up on our conversation late last week, I have spoken with Mr. Hiram Moody at length about some of the options that might be available for a revised dock facility configuration at his property on Fishers Island in Silver Eel Cove. Attached is a drawing that I have prepared for Mr. Moody and your simultaneous review along with the DEC. I have spoken with Ms. Sherri Aicher of the NYS DEC about the options available, that being to stop the pier short of the eel grass bed or to extend it beyond the fringe, as noted during your site visit of August 8d. Ms. Aicher felt that extending the fixed pier and ramping down to float just beyond the eel grass was probably the preferable option. I tend to agree because it would preclude boating in close to shore where the eel grass would certainly almost be hit by the propeller of the boat. It may also be necessary to shift the pier slightly to the south (rotate counterclockwise) a few degrees to make sure that the longer dock does not interfere with Mr. Harvey's approach for his boating access. Mr. Moody is agreeable to deleting the tie-off piles on the north side of the float so as to improve boating access for the Harvey's. We are coordinating a copy of this plan with Mr. Richard Strouse who did the permit drawing preparation for the Harvey's and who is well acquainted with the navigation issues in Silver Eel Cove. We have had discussions with him in the past and are of the same mind regarding riparian allocations and how to avoid conflicts between these two adjacent facilities. I trust that you will find this concept plan self-explanatory and agree that we can proceed with a slightly modified application with the public hearing next Wednesday night. Please give me a call if you have any question or would like to discuss this further. We believe that the proposed reconfiguration is a good and logical resolution of the various issues and will support recreational boating for the Moody family and at the same time protect and preserve the sensitive environmental resources at the site; I trust that you will agree. Yours Truly, DOCKO, INC. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. CC: Hiram Moody FILE: 11-09-2329 MOODY Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com j AUG - 8 2012 , J August 6, 2012 S^oth'aold lows Beard of lnistees Mr. James King,President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Founding Father's Day Dear Mr. King: The buoys have been set at the Moody property in Silver Eel Cove and the DeBroff property located in Pirates Cove on Fishers Island. I hope you have a chance to review each of the sites. I will not be able to attend the meeting but please feel free to call me if you have any questions about either project. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb File 12-02-2365 DEBROFF File 11-09-2329 MOODY Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: office@docko.com Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:01 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Moody Good morning Lauren, Would it be possible for you to forward this information to Mr. King? The buoys for the Moody property have been set. They are not tight wire buoys so they will drift with the wind with an approximate 5-foot radius. They should be visible when they go for the site visit. In addition, Keith will be unable to make the June 20 meeting. Are there any other issues that need to be addressed or does Mr. King have any reservations on either the Moody or Balcom projects. Thank you very much, Cindy Bayreuther Docko, Inc. 5/31/2012 OFFICE LOCATION: U00yo, MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.)Southold, NY 11971Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM =- i�l MAY 10 2012 To: Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: May 10, 2012 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for HIRAM MOODY, JR. SCTM#1000-9-8-3.2 Docko, Inc. on behalf of HIRAM MOODY, JR. requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' wide pile and timber pier and install an 8'X 20' floating dock with hinged ramp and associated float restraint piles, boat berthing tie-off piles, utilities and ladder. The overall length of the pier from the shore waterward of the high tide line and tidal wetlands vegetation is 120'. Located: 33 Reservoir Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#9-8-3.2 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the Board considers the following: 1. Verify that the 35' wide x 32' ramp is of sufficient height to achieve a minimum of fifty percent (50%) incoming solar radiation to the water surface. 2. Verify the water depths at the dock terminus. Water depths have not been indicated. In the event that the action is approved the following BMP is required pursuant to: § 275-11. Construction and operation standards. A. General. The following standards are required for all operations within the jurisdiction of the Trustees: (2) Erosion control. Installation of an erosion control structure is necessary during any building, grading, landscaping or site work activity within Trustee jurisdiction. This structure may include, but is not limited to, installation of a silt fence, hay bales, wood chip berm and silt booms. The placement of the erosion control structure(s) shall be determined by the Trustees or their designee. All intertidal construction and excavation requires the installation of a silt boom that will retain all suspended sediments within the immediateboom that will retain all suspended sediments within the immediateproiect area. v Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney O BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only _ —Coastal Erosion Permit Application _X_Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit L Received Application 1 Received Fee: $ Completed Application,;[-1 01- Incomplete 1Incomplete _ SEQRA Classification Type I_ Type II_ Unlisted_ _ Coordination Date:(Date Sent) - ��r7 LWRPConsistency As ss nt,Fq� _ CAC Referral Sent l� Date of Inspection Receipt of CAC Report Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: Resolution: Name of Applicant: Mr. Hiram Moody Jr. Address: Box 2119 Wickenburg„ AZ 85358 Phone Number: ( 928 ) 231-1076 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000-9-8-3.2 Property Location: 33 Reservoir Road, Fishers Island (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Docko. Inc. (If applicable) Address: P. O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 Phone: (860) 572-8939 1 �� a�7 BJd of Trustees Application* GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet) : 15.151(+/-) Area Zoning: RESIDENTIAL Previous use of property: RESIDENTIAL Intended use of property: RESIDENTIAL Covenants and Restrictions: Yes X No If"Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes X No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date X No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No _Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : Construct a 4-ft wide pile and timber pier and install an 8-ft. wide by 20-ft long float with hinged ramp and associated float restraint piles boat berthingtie-off a=off piles, utilities and ladders all waterward of the apparent high (spring) water line. The overall length of the pier from the existing shore waterward of the high tide line and tidal wetlands vegetation is 120(+/-) LF. Ord of Trustees Applicatite WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: To construct a wood oile and timber vier for recreational boating access and stabilize the shoreline with cribbing,backfill with topsoil and Wanted with native non-invasive species. Area of wetlands on lot: 200(+/-) square feet Percent coverage of lot: 1 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 10 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 10 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling: _X—No _yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: As Is Manner in which material will be removed or deposited:The only foreseeable removals in this prosect Could be the existing pier, which is 20 years old Perhaps more and in need of replacement This structure will be removed by hand. The wood Pile and timber ler will be built of wood components as will the floating dock The hinged ramp will be aluminum This Prolect will be built from the water using customary marine construction equipment a be a Push boat work boat(s) and pile driving equipment Statement of the effect, if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): It is anticipated that there will be no adverse impacts caused by this orofect See attached Protect narrative Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: To construct a wood pile and timber pier for recreational boating access. Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? -__X_No Yes If Yes, now much material will be excavated?None (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? None (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Not Applicable Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features.(Use attachments if necessary): See attached protect narrative a Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com May 11, 2012 Mr. James King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Hiram Moody, Fishers Island New Pier, Ramp, and Float Dear Mr. King: I am transmitting herewith copies of the No Objection letters we received from Mr. Donald R. Cleveland Jr. and Mr.R. Dixon H. Harvey in reference to the new pier,ramp, and float project for Mr. Hiram Moody located in Silver Eel Cove on Fishers Island. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. P n 2 —#LV Keith B. Neilson, P.E. r KBN: cb Cc: Mr. Hiram Moody File: 11-09-2329 MOODY February 23, 2012 To: Town of Southold NYS DEC, NYS DOS& US Army Corps of Engineers Re: New Pier, Ramp, and Float Hiram Moody Jr. Silver Eel Cove, Fishers Island To Whom It May Concern: I/We have reviewed the draft drawings title "New Pier, Ramp, and Float in Silver Eel Cove dated October 14, 2011 prepared for Mr. Hiram Moody Jr. by Docko, Inc. and I have no objections to the proposed project. Signed : R. Dixon H. Harvey Date April 23, 2012 To: Town of Southold NYS DEC,NYS DOS& US Army Corps of Engineers Re: New Pier, Ramp, and Float Hiram Moody Jr. Silver Eel Cove, Fishers Island To Whom It May Concern: I/We have reviewed the drawings title "New Pier, Ramp, and Float in Silver Eel Cove dated October 14, 2011 prepared for Mr. Hiram Moody Jr. by Docko, Inc. and I have no objections to the proposed project. Donald R. Cleveland Jr. Date • o�pSgFFO(,�cQ • James F. King,President Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr. ,Vice-President ,� P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen 'Z` Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyery'� a Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J. Domino Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of HIRAM MOODY,JR. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING �\\Sr,rN residing at/dba l J oG D r1 c% being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the io day of �-ko iv'1 201-41 personally posted the property known as by placing the Board of Trustees official poster wh a it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wed., March 21, 2012. Dated: (signature) .� Sworn to before me this &Hj dayof/n#P-20/9— N Notary Public PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: R. Dixon H. & Janet H. Harvey 2004 Stringtown Road, Sparks, MD 21152 Donald R. Cleveland Jr. 77 Shady Lane, Stamford, CT 06903 STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW LONDON DOCKO. INC. , residing at 14 tjOLMES STREET MYSTIC CT 06355, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the U6 day of 876Vr 20,1c9—deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at MYSTIC, CT, that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this �1L� Day of20 /,_!P,_ �v L j Notary Public Postal Postal . Ln CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT ru CERTIFIED MAII-i RECEIPT r-1 (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) ni (Domestic Mail Only,No Insurance Coverage Provided) rLiM • �. - }1 •' t .. ti ru •;' C t s k 4"gym r M m M1Postage $ T— / U 6 1 ru Postage fL certified Fee Q S 'V� 1 ti Candied Fee � � 1 p Return Receipt Fee Z y� P. Return Receipt Fee Pea" (EndorsementReturn R Required) J J f) nn/'"r' p (Entlorssment Requiretl) 3S Fiefe En rc.n t Delivery Fee 1 Q` }J Reslrictetl Delivery Fee p (B tlorsement Required) w �� O (Endorsement Enquired) // Ute � Q k Om Trial Postage&Fees $ , I s Total Postage&Fees .$ i �- Se Io O -o IT _ �ct_' �...C_\r,s )c,rri- ) r . a 6,.�j xo� �_ Jo�--- Apt1 F� tve� O St fNo __.._. St (A�CNo.' - . . .. .. --- r- a ro ea,No 1 l-L�.v1 L r PO en.No 'll �11G� crty sraitRr+C b� C)�: I cry,warn ztP,a \,-C f --------------- ------ - - k, tt5 a NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: 91(oLm MXdq Jr, SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: To construct a 4'wide pile and timber pier and *..a If an 8'X 20'floating dock with hinged ramp and associated float restraint piles, boat berthing tie-off piles, utilities and ladder.The overall length of the pier from the shore waterward of the high tide line and tidal wetlands vegetation is 120'. TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: LtW, Mych at, Wa6_0n or adbtill OW P11. If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631 ) 765- 1892 PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes a No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. E] Yes [Z]No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy? E lainbriefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? ffes,explain briefl : Yes 9✓ No E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes explain: ❑ Yes ❑✓ No F I PART fit-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large.important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. if question d of part ii was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CFA. Check this box ifyou have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacswhich MAY occur.Then proceed directly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actio WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting thi determination. Board of Trustees p j/I/ Z O / 2— Name Name of Lead Agcy Dale 'IJ ol,f '#4 �C%� President 13 Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Tide of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officenr ead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer) ` 617.20 • Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ©✓ Part 1 11 Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action NEW PIER AND FLOATING DOCK Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 33 RESERVOIR ROAD,FISHERS ISLAND Name of Applicant/Sponsor HIRAM MOODY JR. Address BOX 2119 City/P0 WICKENBURG State AZ Zip Code 85358 Business Telephone (928)231-1076 Name of Owner(if different) Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: Construct a 4-ft.wide pile and timber pier and install an 8-ft wide by 20-ft long float with hinged ramp and associated float restraint piles, boat berthing tie-off piles,utilities and ladders all waterward of the apparent high(spring)water line. The overall length of the pier from the existing shore waterward of the high tide line and tidal wetlands vegetation is 120(+/-)LF. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Questio0ndicate N.A. if not applicable • A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:El Urban M Industrial ❑Commercial r17/ Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm) F1 Forest ElAgriculture ®Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 35 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.1 acres 0.1 acres Forested 0.1 acres 0.1 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.001 acres 0.001 acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.2 acres 0.2 acres Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Gravel a. Soil drainage: E]Well drained 90%of site ®Moderately well drained_%of site. r7✓ Poorly drained 10%of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? NONE acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ri Yes rol No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r70-10% 40% E110- 15% 30 % ❑✓ 15% or greater 30 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Li Yes El No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ENo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0 TO 10 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Yes M No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes M No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any specioplant or animal life that is identified as threatened r endangered? ®Yes E No According to: identify each species; 12. It:hereany:uniqueunusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? []Yes No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ©Yes ElNo If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ❑� No NONE 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NONE a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: NONE b. Size(in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes ®No is a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ril Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ©Yes Ro 18. Is the site located inan agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ❑� No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes Ci No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ❑i No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: .35 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.1 acres initially; 0.3 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0.1 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 0.005 (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 3 ; proposed existirp g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: N/A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 Existing Ultimately 1 Retain i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 10 height; 8 width; 122+/. length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? NONE tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes ❑No N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E]Yes No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes E No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? NONE acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 yeaiS'616) or other locally-important vegetation be rem• by this project? E]Yes El No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: I months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? C] Yes ❑ No B. Will blasting occur during construction? E]Yes El No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E]Yes IFI No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes El No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ©Yes E]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? E]Yes E]No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? E]Yes r7No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes r7E No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons J. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? C]Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes El No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? r7Yes ENo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site lifer years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ©Yes no No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? E]Yes ENo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ©Yes H1 No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 10+/_ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? E]Yes E No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ❑No Town of Southold February 2012 Board of Trustees City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board 17 Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department 17 Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No NYS DEC February 2012 State Agencies IF]Yes E] No � NYS DOS February 2012 Federal Agencies El Yes ❑ US Army Corps February 2012 of Engineers C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes ❑i No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance © New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site plan ❑Special use permit ©Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) 00 site? • Residential,single family,one dwelling per lot 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Residential,single family,one dwelling per lot 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No changes 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? No zone changes proposed 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? El Yes 1:1 No 7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a'/4 mile radius of proposed action? Adjacent land uses are residential,single family and multi-family. S. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a'/4 mile? ®i Yes E]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? Not applicable a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑ Yes ❑� No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑Yes El No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes F]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Hiram Moody Jr. Date 212S.1136 Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 Town of Southold LWRP CON&ENCY ASSESSMENT FORM • A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both stumortine and non-supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000—09—9—27.4 PROJECT NAME: New Pier and Floating Dock The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Board Building Dept. Board of Trustees ✓ X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X 1 Nature and extent of action: Construct 61 +/- LF of 4-ft wide Ahd wood pile and timber including 7 tidlhff pilings. Install an 3.5-FT. wide x 30-ft. (+/-)ramDW an 8-ft x 20-ft wood float with assn ed restraint piles all waterward of the apparent high water line. Location of action: Property located on 33 Reservoir Road Site acreage: Parcel = .35 Acres Present Land use: Residential Present Zoning Classification: Residential 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: a) Name of applicant: Hiram Moody Jr. b) Mailing Address: Box 2119, Wickenburg, AZ 85358 c) Telephone number: Area Code (928)684-5944 d) Application number, if any Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X No_ If yes, which state or federal Agency? US ACOE, NYS DEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes _No _Not Applicable These dock modifications makes appropriate use of an existing waterfront site and complies with environmental design factors published by the NYS DEC, and the DOS Coastal Management Program, Southold Local Law No. 6. 2004 and the Southold LWRP The pier will be built to a 4-foot deck height over the bottom sediments until passing the apparent mean low water line. Rails will be 42 inches above the deck. There will be no impairment of waterflow.navigation or public access. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable 2 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality d protect scenic resources throng ut the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III 4Wlicies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluatlWriteria Yes No X Not Applicable The only portion of the oronosed work visible to any extent is the construction of a wood timber and pile supported pier with a floatine dock. The only land side visual access affected by this oroiect is at the applicant's site the Ferry District property across the cove and immediate neighbors in this small cove, which is high terrain lined by trees. The facility will be more visible through the leafless trees, in fall, winter, and early serine from the road. The dock's site will be visible from the water only when directly north of the line of the cove. The size of pile's diameters are limited based on the Town of Southold design reouirements. A pier for private recreational boating off residential property in an "adjacent area"is a compatible use. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures,and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable These proposed dock modifications will take place in Silver Eel Cove and is acknowledged to be in a flood-prone area; there is wave exposure at this site. The pier extension will be designed to accommodate complete submersion and resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic uplift pressures due to floodine. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable This oroiect will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinkine water on Fishers Island. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes _ No Not Applicable This project is consistent with this policy because it proposes the elevation of the We extension at an acceptable heiebt above the bottom sediments through which adjacent tidal wetlands vegetation may spread, the dock site. The NYS DEC prepared a study showing that the oronosed pressure-treated Southern Pine timber products construction materials are suitable for this type of project in this location, except for decking which will be of untreated woods or composite (or plastic) materials. The configuration shown on the drawings provides an optimum balance between acceptable design and access standards without depriving the wetlands veeetation the opportunity to spread. 3 roncy i. rrolecl ana Improve air yualny in ine luwn ul Joutitulu. our Lvt ltr omtlull 111 —Policies Pages 32 through 34 for lnation criteria. • Yes _ No X Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this project. No emissions will be generated by the dock facility. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this project. The pressure-treated wood trimmings from the dock construction will be collected and disposed of in accordance with current regulations so as to minimize any harmful affect. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This project is being built emanating from private land. The public trust lands and waters constitutes the area between the mean high water line and mean low water line and the resources are from the high tide line, out. These environmental resources are being Protected by the suitable alignment and height design standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the reconstruction of the pier and landward extension above the apparent high water line are not likely to influence or change this fact. WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This proiect is to build a pier extension for water-dependent, recreational boating and to construct shoreline stabilization for the house foundation. This usage is defined as water- dependent in the LWRP. The pier will provide for recreational boating and boat transportation access to the Island or the mainland. The pier will provide access without adverse environmental impacts and while protecting existing habitat and limited resources. 4 Policy 11. Promote sustainable uef living marine resources in Long*!d Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for commercial fishing or shellfish industries or enterprises. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any agricultural or aquaculture industries or entemrises. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any energy or mineral mining or processingoperations. PREPARED BY Keith B. Neilson,P.E. Docko,Inc. TITLE Agent_DATE 5 Town of Sout old Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM YS PROPERTY LOCATION: S.c.T.M.#: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A OG 00C.' C? e) 3,1 sTORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN lS[sFcc Tear -9rm-F- -ro—t-- CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TI"EM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? Will this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within �6-/x5/ 5F fi Generated by a Two(2")Inch Rainfall on Site? ❑ the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) is F rAc es) (This item will include all run-off created by site b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed }./ Site Improvements and the permanent creation of (S.F.I Aces) i.�t7 5� construction activity? impervious surfaces.) 2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed ❑ PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DFSCRIPTTON (Prwme Aaalu„mr Pasea e.N,a+ad) Drainage Structures Indicating Size 8 Location?This � Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and /l Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. f- __ 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion ❑ re al, d `I�w �/ r -7aC and sediment control practices that will be used to r/ /A' J- / � -y-� control site erosion and storm water discharges. This 0 Tr a,iJG h y �J fir- o<2l item must be maintained throughout the Entire p / / Construction Period. 1i7 1" "v_a all 4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or If /" Excavation where there is a change to the Natural YbuAP JN 0�cJ `-f�__hk;�o `a-t� Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards / I of Material within any Parcel? "q/(Q — 'Pdes /(,(J�J.f/Qty G(J� i1 f/J. 5 Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities `$CGA c3 (-�YtY 1,(,Cr-r Lt t )cI ler �,LtcC� Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand ❑ ✓ (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? �7 Lt-.. /Il'L7 5 Q_�_,$ UfC S GS[G 1 [G1Yo s there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction 1/ General DEC SWPPP Requirement: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Weiland or Submission of a SWPPP is required for all Construction activities Involving sol Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more acres; including disturbances of less than one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes 1:1are pan of a larger common plan that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to including Construction activities involving sol disturbances of leu than one(1)acre where One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit is required for storm water discharges. (SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirement of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas or other Impervious for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Penult No.GP-0.10-001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off F] V,1.The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the Not.The NOf shah be into and/or in the direction of a Town right-of-way? submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. 2.The SWPPP shah describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, F1required,post-construction storm water management practices that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any ✓ constructed to reduce the pollutant in storm water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-0f--Way or Road Shoulder compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit In addition,the SWPPP shall Area?link,ipm will NOT incwa the instnaean or Driveway,Agon.) identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges. NOTE: I/Any Answer to Questions One through Nine is Answered with a Check Mark 3.All SWPPPs that require the post-constmdbn storm water management practice in a Box and the construction site disturbance Is between 5,000 S.F.a,1 Acro In arse, component shall be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed In New York a Stnn-Water,Grading,Drainage S Erosion Control Plan Is Required by the Town of that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of Storm Water Management Southold and Must be Submitted for Review Prior to Issuance of Any Building Permit. (NOTE: A Check Mat(J)an for Answer for each Gum ion is Required for a Complete Apphcawn) STATE OF NF>W*GtlW, C—r I' COUNTY OF........IVJULJ.....JUX1dA`.1\SS That I,....IC.k't-,o.....6..... ..................being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, (Name of individual signing DowmeM) �] .J.. Andthat he/she is the .............................................Ac.i ..1................................................................................................. (Ownereltractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,e Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that Al statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief,and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me this; .......... . ..... day ofU....... Cb . ....,. ,2T.0e�- .... .............. .................Notary Public .1...... /' � (Signature or APPlirant) FORM - 06/1 Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York Hiram F. Moody Jr. BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE / SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVE(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ZZ 4 DAY OF Jr, 20-L�— Notary Public Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) I. Hiram F.Moodv Jr. residing at Box 2119 (print owner of property) (mailing address) Wickenbura. AZ 85358 do hereby authorize DOCKO.INC.. (Agent) MYSTIC.CT to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. (Owner's signature) 0 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics Prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The ouroose of this form is to Provide information which can alert the town of Possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Htm,, -y"I n lean-err 6, kc2, {& k1ts (Last name,first name,middle mi al,u ess you hre applying in the time of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO _Le< If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted thi 'Zda,JJ{{of� �'� 208 Signature /,'7il`J dfi„f Print Name *:o-4?rA4 Aj4lilsers, Form TS 1 NEW WD PIER AND FLOATING DOCK PIWERTY OF HIRAM MOODY 33 RESERVOIR ROAD,FISHERS ISLAND NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FEBRUARY 2012 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Moody's own parcel 1000-9-8-3.2 off Reservoir Road located near the south end of the Silver Eel Cove on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel earthen materials and moderately covered with trees and understory along the shore. The frontage of the property is approximately 30 feet along Silver Eel Cove abutted by Donald R. Cleveland, Jr. to the west and across the street and R. Dixon H. Harvey, Jr. and Janet H. Harvey to the north side and William Wood and Wife also across the street. The waterfront consists of a steep bank to a stone and gravel shoreline with small sporadic spartina alterniflora and patens growth areas and either side of an old, long-standing, wood post supported timber pier. It is the Moody's desire to build a wood timber and pile supported pier and floating dock with associated piles for float restraint and berthed boat tie-offs, utilities and ladders all waterward of the apparent high water line. The new pier will be at an elevation of 6 feet and crossing over the intertidal zone at a minimum height of five feet above the bottom sediments. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold's, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Section 661 of the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation regulations for Tidal Wetlands. SEQUENCE OF WORK As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to construct a fixed wood pile and timber pier in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that the structures will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine dock contractor will arrive by barge with barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the new landside end of the pier and proceeding waterward to shore at roughly 10-foot intervals. These piles will be driven by double-acting air powered hammer to a bearing resistance of approximately 20 tons. This generally results in about ten feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Pier support piles will be 10-inch nominal diameter measured at 3 feet from the butt; float restraint and tie-off piles will be 12-inch diameter. 1 ➢ After the piles are installed, split caps (also known as split clamps) consisting of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers ranging from 3 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile pair or "bent". Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, four runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to provide security against uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. The stringers will run level at an elevation of 5 feet until they reach a point 5 feet above the existing bottom sediments and then slope upward at 1 foot vertically per 10 feet horizontally, more or less paralleling as closely as possible, the slope of the existing inter-tidal zone until reaching an elevation of the patio. At this point, the decking will level off and run straight to the shore landing. ➢ After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine but untreated fir, oak, cedar or it could be "Timber Tech" or similar plastic composite material with the rough side mounted up. If plastic is used, it will be gray, brown, or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing stainless steel flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a 1/4"W-) gap between members. ➢ The alignment of the pier will be perpendicular to shore throughout its length including, the ramp and float. ➢ The pier support piles will extend 42 inches above the deck surface. Because of the walkway height, the piles will provide the attachment point for horizontal rail members mounted to the piles. ➢ A new-hinged ramp will be installed at the dockside end of the pier so as to land on the first third of the float. This will be an aluminum ramp because of its length. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boats may be powered during tie-ups. In addition, the water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the float or end of the pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have a coiling arm for storage of the hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low-intensity lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the walking surface. This system will be manually controlled so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. 2 REQUIREMENTS OF SMION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of construction operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ALOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, CCA pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles with new framing of the same materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's with two '/a" bolts or one 1" bolt per connection. This dock facility is a fixed, pile-supported timber pier with a floating dock, floating more than 18 inches off the bottom at low tide and therefore does not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels. In addition, it does not present an adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the hinged ramp landing of the structure might be flooded. The structure timber materials are specifically grown for this purpose and represent the standard of the industry. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even incident waves at higher tide elevations. 3. It is respectfully requested that the use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers be approved for this project. 3 0 0 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. 5. The 15-foot property line offset clearance specified in this paragraph will be an issue because of the narrow frontage of the lot. This project has been laid out to make reasonable use of a small cove and reaches adequate water depth yet maintains adequate clearance from existing structures and the likely area of new structures on adjacent properties. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking other than the tops of piles, power post, lights and railing nor are any planned at this time. 8. There is no room for a five-foot passage way on the upland to get around this pier and so access ability will be retained by keeping the pier high enough to allow foot traffic to pass beneath the structure. There is little room to walk along the narrow shoreline between the house and water at low tide; foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all. NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands Regulations--Sections 6615 and 6619 This project represents the construction of a new dock facility at the Moody property at the far south end of Silver Eel Cove. The dock facilities to be built include a pier and pier landing over the intertidal zone as well as a floating dock accessed by ramps from the pier. The float restraint piles hold the floats in place as shown in the application drawings. The wetland vegetation in the vicinity of the dock site does consist of isolated growth areas and does not constitute a "wetland"; the dock site is an "adjacent area". Piers for recreational boating at residential properties on the waterfront are considered to be generally compatible use in an adjacent area (AA) with a permit being required under Section 661.5 (b) (1), 15 and 24. Under Section 661.9, the standards for issuance of permits of NYS DEC regulations, the following are considered to be pertinent considerations. ➢ The policies are created to preserve and protect tidal wetlands and prevent their despoliation and destruction. Regulated activities will not have an undo adverse impact on the present or potential value of the affected tidal wetlands. Sporadic clumps of tidal wetlands vegetation does exist in the vicinity of the dock site at the toe of the bank interface between the existing stone seawall and the exposed rock- covered, sandy bottom sediments in the intertidal zone. This spartina patens vegetation however, does not constitute a tidal wetlands and, in any case, the proposed dock facility is clear of it. 4 This pier and floating dock facility construction project is compatible with public health and welfare policie,W the State. • ➢ The project complies with development restrictions contained in Section 661.6. Furthermore, the project is a waterfront dock facility structure and is compatible with the use of the site, zoning, and the long-standing use along the waterfront. ➢ This project will not have an undo or adverse impact on the present or potential value of nearby tidal wetlands vegetation. Town of Southold—Local Waterfront Revitalization Pro ram These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 —Water Dependent Uses This project is to construct a fully functional water dependent use, a docking facility for recreational boating at this site. Policy 5 —Use of Existing Developed Shorefront This project will be primarily to build a pier to a logical shoreward point of origin, the existing pier (which will be replaced) on the westerly side of the home, elevated well above sensitive habitat or tidal wetlands and make it safe and reliably usable in all weather conditions. Policy 7 —Significant Fish& Wildlife Habitat Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier's shore point of beginning will be at the toe of the steep bank with an initial landing for the stair and then a level segment to the ramp landing, with five feet of height will be maintained above bottom sediments between the mean high and mean low water lines. Policy 8 — Protection & Preservation of Habitat Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its minimal configuration consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold. The pier alignment has been laid out to suit the shoreline terrain and characteristics of the cove. The landside end of the pier is elevated as much as possible to allow sunlight to reach the bottom sediments. This is,however, a shaded shoreline in Silver Eel Cove. Policy 11 — Minimize Damage to Natural Resources The shoreline is shaded by the trees from the east and south. The pier construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above by alignment, light transmissive deck material, and elevation. The point of landfall is an existing pier beneath, trees on the steep bank. The higher end of the pier will cross will above the small fringe growth and the narrower hinged ramp will span submerged aquatic vegetation in the shallow sub-tidal zone where the dock facility is to be located. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier that will in no way adversely affect water flow and circulation or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence on those flood levels. 5 Policy 15 — No Dredgin Dredging is not required in this project. The floating dock system has been laid out and configured to avoid dredging requirements. The water in this cove does get appreciably deeper further out to the north. The pier and float is of adequate length to reach 4 feet of water and will not exceed the "25% width of waterway criteria"(US ACOE), more restrictive then the Trustee's 33% criteria. Policy 19 — Impact on Public Access — Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site. The intertidal zone hosts two small tidal wetlands fringe growth areas and the shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. Thus, public access to the public trust lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. Policy 20 — Public Trust Comnatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses Public Trust compatibility with borders and existing adjoining properties and land uses has also been considered in this project. This pier and float will not interfere with any existing or possible future facilities on immediately adjoining properties. This dock facility is situated and configured within the 25% of the waterway width from shore(US ACOE criteria), which is more restrictive than the Trustee's 33% criteria. Policy 21 — Water Dependent Recreation This project is consistent with water- dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. The dock system will be used for recreational boating and water recreation. Policy 24 —Scenic Resources Impairment or Loss This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The construction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier, will represent new encroachment or structure but one which will not create a loss of scenic resources below the horizon. The elevated inboard section will be largely obscured by the tree growth on the site on the bank and the other dock facilities in this cove. Policy 25 —Enhance Overall Scenic Quality The new dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands It is acknowledged that the Sporadic fringe growth areas of spartina altemiflora along the shorefront is a valuable, though extremely limited, resource. The existing fringe growth and patches of spartina are certainly not acting as a marsh nor do they create a substantial amount of habitat but nonetheless, they will not physically be disturbed and the pier will remain in the footprint of the long-standing deck so as not to move closer to the sporadic clumps. The raised height of the pier should allow the continued health of the spartina fringe marsh adjacent to the wood pier. 6 SUMMARY This project represents a new fixed pier and float for recreational boating access for the Moody property on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC, and DOS and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, Town of Southold Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and is a presumptively compatible use under NYS DEC Regulations Part 661; its approval is respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. 4- 0"4-w_ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. 7 a Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com February 22, 2012 Mr. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Hiram Moody Jr., Fishers Island New Pier, Ramp & Float Silver Eel Cove, Fishers Island Dear Mr. King: On behalf of Mr. Hiram Moody, we enclose herewith the following in support of his permit application for a new pier, ramp, and float in Silver Eel Cove on Fishers Island. ➢ Two prints each of plans titled: Project: "New Pier, Ramp& Float" 2012 Waterway: Silver Eel Cove F r n Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Applicant: Hiram Moody Jr. Date: October 14, 2011 ➢ Two copies of the Southold Board of Trustees permit application, SEQR-Part 1, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, site photographs and location map and topographic and boundary survey of the site as well as a copy of the deed.. ➢ Check in the amount of$250.00 payable to the Town of Southold. ➢ One copy of each of the other applications to regulatory agencies. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, O KOINC Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN:cb Enclosures CC: Hiram Moody Jr. US ACOE NYS DEC: Environmental Permits NYS DOS File: 11-09-2329 MOODY opt FISHERS ISLAND • ' - I�A1\ \ . souNp �. nB . 13 3 � NOV — 5 2012 • \ ali o / ss =Fl rat od" SITE, ..-.: . . If- L ss ss •�� 5$• �!r ed SOUNDv \ Piald f3 T of i 4\'t e ] ° TOWN of LOG 4TIOIV MAP REFERENCE \\ CHART:12372SgRAPHIC N/F PROPERTY of . ... "-""q Boo p 800 N YARDS SCALE HARVEY 5 r .( �• . ` f.A... , -..,,'".:.", <�;;:;: "•:- ._ . , :. NOTES: PROPERTY of 1.ELEVATION DATUM 15 APPARENT MEAN LOW MOODY r r.,_ ....'.....: -1•,.. .:':: LOWER WATER(MLLW). f.• / ` r { 2 TIDE DATA 15 TAKEN FROM 2011 NOAA TIDE TABLES REFERENCE:SILVER EEL COVE. 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 118t1P OF 4-FT WIDE RXED WOOD _...: ... _.- �... \�`�,,•i .t NEW PIER and j O PILE AND TIMBER PER INCLUDING TWO LADDERS OUTHAUL PILES 'O AND TWO OUTHAUL PILES,ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE.CONSTRUCT 5 •• �.+. 11t LF OF 4-FT WIDE WOOD DECK LAN GWARD OF t THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER LINE. �SIL�/ER ( EEL 4.PROJECT PURPOSE ( -. THIS IS A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL Sy� \ I BOATING. 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGSREPRESENT �^ �; �'\ \ �\lS` N/F PROPERTY pf A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ;�� t 1S GLEVELAND _ ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTIONIT MAY BE DOCUMENTS.A \ •�n I �c TOWN BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS NORTH: WEST: (;; '` R DIXON H.$JANET H.HARVEY DONALD R CLEVELAND JR 2004 STRINGTOWN ROAD 77 SHADY LANE SPARKS,MD 21152 STAMFORD.CT 06903 PROJECT NEW PIER and OUTHAUL PILES OF NEhi REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOCATION: RSHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �t+���Ty r TIDAL DATUM$PROJECT SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK Gj \Yy DESCRIPTION WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 . DOC $O PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPUGANT: HIRAM F.MOODY n " � AGENT: SHEET I OF 4 rC�'�5. � ?• REVISED 9-2p-12 T.O.S. __ 'O68692"� �C? PROJECT DESCRIPTION �OCKC•, INC. 4 p4� Kekh B.Neilson,PE O .�� OFESSION O MYstIc,Cr 06355 P O t' SW 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 EMAIL docko®snei.net DWG 11-09-2329 KH1h 5.Ne'lwn,Dadra Inc. 9/24/x0121156 N'1 Noody_ID.A.g N o APPARENT MEAN!LOW LOWER WATER APPARENT MEAN (MLLW)FI s.0 HIGH WATER •-1.4EL3.61 t ' SITE 5 FAP \ \ \ STONESLOPE PROPERTYOF �p \ TOP MOODY BANK . mi Q \ . S,ynG30`� LAWN PPPROX� APPROXIM4TE SEWER IJNE LIMIT OF SPARSE EELS-RASS _•• • . -zs BIDR m LOCATION AFFROXIMAiE UMff Y OF SPARSE EELGRA55 �. PATH OD APPRAO)AWTELIMITSOF •:7 RAMPDENSE FRr,]V -29 / WOOD DE SEL 7I: J I R EDSE OF Wl SANDY BEACH n / BRUSH APPROX LIMITS / =9.71 MLLW SIL�/ER l< OF TIDAL.WETLANDS ,f EEL NIF EDGE OF DONALD R C EVEIryNp JR GRASS - / EJGISTIIVG / GOIVD/TIOIV��- / GRAPHIC SCALE 1'v 30' / 30 15 O 30 SURVEY by CME ASSOCLATES ELEVATIONS ARE BASM ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER(MLLW) PROJECT: NEW FIER and OUn-CAUL PILES -REVISED 5-1-12 DEC LOGATIONt FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPOrGRADO RS If SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK CP WATERWAY: SILVER EEL GOvE �' OOrOBER 14,2011 0 C Lu �M REVISED 9-20.12 DEC DATE . D x O . s ��2 '* APPLICANT HIRM1 F.MOODY D � COMMENTS If PROJECT i 1 + W -REVISED 10-10.12 DEC AGENT SHEET 2 OF 4 SILVER EEL COVE WIDTH A D68G92•� ���' IOOGI<PE INC. �C, q�FESStONP� MW"c,CT 0Kefth B. 6355 0 R P 0 R �' 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 11-09-2329 EMAIL docka®sle ret ��th 5. Plellsun, D,,cG. In, 10/10/2012 9.37 AM Moody-28A.9 N BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLAN �/IE=W TOWN-OF SO E 1. 20 APPARENT 20 1O 0 20 OWER Q x I Z I 12— WATEER LOW EL=O.O APPARENT MEAN HIGH WATER EL.26't x —3.5 \ \ 0.7 . APPROMMATE LIMITS -u BLDR\ \ \ \ SITE OF DENSE EELGRASS \ z.z \ PROPERTY of 52sFT a �Rlgu Inl M0bDY y —t.7 BLS 0.9 x �. y NEW 4-FT WIDE PIER B I 4 x BEGINNING DECK EL 7.4x � 11 A3 I 1 =x -2.a i NEW LADDERS - . x .t 99rFK 0 x LIGHT TRANSMIS5NE GRAT E DECK 12+FT BLDR 3 x _ SLOPE EW RAILS(TYP) 1.0 x 2 END PIER EL 5± 1. 64NPER SUPPORT/ REMOVE EXISTING / 4.7 y PILES(7YP) / 60 SF WOOD DECK x —2.9 / APPROXIMATEIJMRS OF SPARSE EELGRASS WQp(T P05 / 4 / APPROXIMATE �' T Ir a.e �I �. � 4.,� LIMITS OF I v SPARSE NEW IO-IN DIAMETER , 1\0 EELGRA55 OUTHAULPILE(Tlpq BREACH APPROXIMATE LIMITS �pAPPROX LIMITS OF DENSE EELGRA55 OF TIDAL WETLANDS 7 EDGE OF C-RA55 7 7 SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES / ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW LOWER WATER"UAk,) PROJECT: NEW PIER and OUTHAUL PII FS -REVISED 51-12 DEC LOCATION: PSHER5ISLAND-TOWN OF 50UTHC 1 CONTOURS✓F SUFFOLK COUNTY•NEW YORK �NKEIT SPOTGRADESADJ. WATERWAY: SILVER EEL COVE REVISED 8-2-12 H . DATE OCTOBER 14 20IID 0 C R` �¢ TIE-0FF PILES APPLIGWf: HIRAM F.MOODY • O r 9 • ' -REVISED 9-20.12 TO.S. �/ W � •�°��� ' W COMMENTS$PROJECT �E�: SHEET 3 G9=4 -REMSED 9-28-12 DEG Keith OApDOCKO, INC. 068652-� ��A SUPPORT RLE DIM. MystiBcrO5355 OO POR 86 E' OFESSION� -REVISED 10-10-12 DEC 860 572 6939 FAX 0 572 7569 SILVER EEL COVE WIDTH EMAIL dockog*wt.tW DWG n-09-2329 K-"B.Nelleon•Docko Inc. 70/26/201212:25 PM McodY—�o"j-9 4+T NEW 19 OUTIIAUL PILE DSKr' TOP EL 17-FTYPJ i(T NEW PILE SUPPORTED PIER WDII-I END DECK EL 5sFf NEW 64N SUPPORT�PILE `� TOP EL 4-FT ABOVE Dcc,F(i�v)� NEW SPLIT CLAMP aid - - - - -AHWL 3.121— CROSS BRACE M-F) — ALWL 0.18 ?DGROAM4TE GRPDE :w; �I) D AT ETD OF PIER ` `;SM`D ESIL7 =.Li 1 . E3fVL7 �/IEW` GRAPHC SCALE 1'=10' NOTE DECKNG-NOT GGA TREATED,HMDWOOD5 10 3 O 10 MUST BE CFRMED BY FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL If. ITRANSMISSIVE GRATE DECK EXISTING STAIRS TO BE REBUILT OVER EELGRA_% --�I NEW 4-FT WIDE PIER NEW 64N PER SUPPORT PILE BEGINNING DECK EL BsFT TOP EL 4sFT ABOVE DECK(TYP) MAXIMUM SLOPE 1:i NEW RALS(TYP) 12iFT ENO PIER EL 54FT� NEW LADDER(TYo AiWL _ . — �'w &FT �T M1W—1 c .f: - '.'.`fi '.;< c= s TSITONE 5LOFE<. ,k�lti y�� , �vF< i BOTTOM SEDIM '}' -r..y..`- tom- LIMITS of` APPROXIMATE LIMITS gSILT 1' TE DENSE of SPAR-SEEM-GRASS EELGRA55 FCL GRASS NOTE OUTHAUL PIKS NOT SHOWN IN THIS VIEW FOR CLARITY OF ITER PROFI L_E COMPONENTS. GRPPHC SCALE 1-=20 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON APPARENT MEAN LOW WATER(AML" 20 10 0 20 PROJECT: NEW PIER and OLJTHALJL PILES R 5-1P2 DEC LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �rGQF ��'Y EVISED END VIEW$PROFILE SUFFOLK COUNTY.NEW YORK �P ON KE) WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND REVISED 8-2-12 H.M. DATE OCTOBER 14 2011 D 0 C K 0 * Z 9 7k TIE-0FF PILE ApPLICANT: HIRAM F.MOODY C •Fj+ w C, REVISED 9-20-12 T.OS. Yw• 2 COMMENTS s PROJECT AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 �68692'� 4, REMISED 9-26-12 DEC DOGKO, INC. C R�,q A �. SUPPORT PILE$.PER Keith B.Nellson,PE 0 P pOfESS10NP CLEARANCE DIM.and PIER 'cr 0035 860 572 8939 5FAX 860572 7569 P 0 R ELEVATION EMAL dodwow et.net DWG 11-09-2329 Felth B. Neilson, Docko Inc 10/26/2012 12:20 PM Moody_4F.dwg N E MAP REFERENCES M o, 1.) SURVEY MAP PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED TO HIRAM F. MOODY, III OA RESERVOIR ROAD FISHERS ISLAND, NY CHANDLER, PALMER Sc KING N G ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 110 BROADWAY NORWICH, •� rof CT 06360 DECEMBER 29, 1997 SCALE 1"= 20 FT. c U � m m of U NOTES a a g • bp b 1.) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PARTIES AND PURPOSE INDICATED 0 3 HEREON. ANY EXTENSION OF THE USE BEYOND THE PURPOSED AGREED TO ro BETWEEN THE CLIENT AND THE SURVEYOR EXCEEDS THE SCOPE OF THE un U m U o ENGAGEMENT. � a 2.) IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON, '� ¢ 0 s UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, TOs� V TS ~ U Z o ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. �G�l 9 �� m gt U M o 3.) ONLY COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MARKED WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND AN ORIGINAL EMBOSSED OR INK SEAL ARE THE PRODUCT OF ` THE LAND SURVEYOR. c 4.) COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC ) Fr m � SURVEY TRIANGULATION STATION "PROS". �.n U m � � U 5.) SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TAX MAP 1000, SECTION 009, BLOCK B, LOT 3.002. N M 6 A� 6.) TOTAL AREA = 15,151f SQ. FT. 7.) SITE IS LOCATED IN R-40 ZONE. \' 9.) BASE FOR LEVELS - MLLW (NGVD 1929 TIDAL 2 STA II 26 - 11.62' ABOVE MLLW) PUBLISHED 05/29/2009 LOCATION MAP SCALE 1 "=400' APPROX. SEWER LINE RAILROAD LOCATION SPIKE 86 (FOUND) C) N/F 50 � Y R. DIXON H. HARVEY, JR. -D Q o & JANET H. HARVEY o 0 APPROX. NE 000 W�s LOCATION COURBI d p O � W EO APPROX. MEAN CO0 NC. Q L 0 ! ^ G Z Fly' HIGH WATER \ lJ APPROX. EL.=2.R't �'y�s1 WALK 2 0 O 0 MLLW �tPaQ WATER S5�' -y0�0 �\ •%�\ I (.5\ 13 > Q O Ld Z x 6 FT. HIGH STOCKADE tv py 0- -La =) - Lr-I WOOD FENCE---�, N O 2 = DO Of i LL N LJ STONE 1't O Q � SLOPE �� W r" EXISTNG GRAVEL �p O v J ` 611 BLDR. RESIDENCE �\ PARKING ; 90, TSO CONC. _ BLDR. sl A!n6'3 WALK -------- i1 1L=1I 4 643 OIL FILL ���-L \ IIx -1.7 BLDR. O.s x & VENT -J 2g " \ APPROX. 4 FT. HIGH \ S35'25'30" s 0 SEWER LINE /jv° \FENCE AINLINK \\ I BL Ri-i1 11.43' LOCATION 3 m o -as x I� �i_�i\, S12'15'30"W I DIOCK WOOD PATH GARDEN 1* o > I ; x -2.6 15.35' RAMP -3.2 q \I 7.0 x s WALL /µ• (n Zp EDGE OF /� ---- — -- EELGRASS ---- 0/'A' o/W O/W °/W POLE W z x _ APPROX. LOCATION /; ;I DEED LINE IR04 44.00' POLE - -- - -- -, CONC. O `' (I� �, �lLP' ROD 1 /� ISI I IRON 193.°0. CURB 26 - o U)i� - -._- ,—.� a.o x _ 3. �i, JUL 2 2012 1 i -3.7 x/� I BLD ,�• RDD `y� S86'OS'00"E 237.00' _. WOOD i 4.7 p - I If'II I \I POST ��' W/ I 11 i ix -2.9 wooD GK / NTyR (OUND� ' J! W`0 EDGE OF O� W Rnerd of Trusl=es £vuthvld is an I �l N 7.1'tn I \(� �J� / ROAD PAVED ROAO DR/I/E N 383.28 �.._ ---_ ) W 5366.98 a -3.9 x% �. EDGE OF SANDY EELGRASS BEACH �� / o z 2 APPROX. LOCATION APPROX. LIMBS BENCHMARK DRILL HOLE LEGEND OF TIDAL WETLANDS ELEVATION = 9. 71 a SILVER ELL N/F NOW OR FORMERLY F COVE EDGE OF — o GRASS / �-' — SO. FT. SQUARE FEET Q n rn n n — --- — — p o � 0 0 / MLLW MEAN LOW LOW WATER co o m Do / v o STONE RETAINING WALL N N cr not D] w / o/w OVERHEAD WIRES O z w Z Z Y / o0 CHAINLINK FENCE QUALITY CONTROL CERTIFICATION o WOOD FENCE a m o L= m . i GROUP REVIEWED DATE / DATE: 04/09/2012 PROJECT MANAGER / SURVEY / 20 10 0 20 SCALE: 1 " = 20' ENVIRONMENTAL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET CML STRUCTURAL SHEET: 1 OF 1 A1tCHITECNRAL