The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-7919 John M.Bredemeyer III,President o��OF SU(/4, Town Hall Annex Michael J.Domino,Vice-President h O 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski Telephone(631) 765-1892 Charles J. Sanders 'rOI�C Fax(631) 765-6641 ®UNTd, `6 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE # 1280C Date: October 5, 2016 THIS CERTIFIES that the construction of one single-family residence pool, and associated water supply, sewage disposal facilities and a 4' wide access path to the water,• with the condition that there'be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight(8)feet landward of the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge as shown on the survey; At 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold Suffolk County Tax Map#1000-54-4-19 Conforms to the application for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated September 18,2012 pursuant to which°Trustees Wetland Permit#7919 and Coastal Erosion Permit#7919C Dated October 17,2012,was issued and conforms to gill of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The project for which this certificate is being issued is for the construction of one single-family residence,pool, and associated water supply, sewage disposal facilities and a 4' wide access path to the water,with the condition that there be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight(8)feet landward of the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge as shown on the survey. The certificate is issued to ROBERT&MARGARET BOMBARA owners of the aforesaid property. fs PIP— Authorized Signature S�FF01 y� John M. Bredemeyer III, Presidentcow .. Town Hall Annex Michael J_ Domino, Vice-President `_� ti� 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith � z ` P O. Box 1179 �N A Nicholas Krupski N ® �, Southold, NY 11971 Charles J. Sanders rol , a� r T elephor�e (63 1') 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION. 0,/ f� Ch. 275 Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction r constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: It CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: wasp Robert&Margaret Southold • '" North1725 CCTM#: 1000-54-4-19 aw I • '- 1 F t: y 1 6 11 : 33 ' � �ti,r`' � Pia�`. `t rel .. < S� ` 4[.•�'� r: „ . R ..T y. I � 1 `1 I f 5/ 4%2016 11 : 33 Robert&Margaret Bombara 1725 North Sea Drive,Southold f SCTM#i: 1000-54-4-19 5/3/16 d mow ate' .arm 0 1 s Robert&Margaret Bombara 1725 North Sea Drive,Southold SCTM#: 1000-54-4-19 / �f 5/3/16 4 1110 r �- - r , m- w� Irl •��, ` l �.v" �y _�+J��Sc�" •s- �.i r. �b..fl '�,�Iw � �iys..• W .. _��``'Y o �- �+` � p'� �+. .•11. .by i/'hl � � �-fA,(/!f ' r •++ 1 '�' + �j-1�a ./ti l •� i'r - } +"'^,.hr 'S.2� ,t' 1r `A '.a �i� ?: a('.�, y.:Mss`, .x � s ` t " 11� «�'t�s "�I.� X '.74 dry �+ - �1. ~ .�i� ' y�� rN.yAa.' "1 `'�. +,r �rK� rf•+ , �R y1 !'v- .i_. t. I.a�.. �r'Y�',� ' I M',t .� -`L'M 1�•i 'i'�S`.yJ'!�'..Y- #^ �;,J�;3'ht�9 .. ++ t �W •� �' �':f� �` =�! .~� -�,. � SAT �*��j�s � ir��-r rte`";!y �,�� *� r •�1C�•'��M�`•�"i s., , �. O �, ,yi t, '+~ y„fes *� ti �,, r ,711 l., ti._,Q:+► .L R �e. �y..•�1 ' $ 71, ,I+ .w, .V i J{7,. d, `,,,.•/�!TVy,,,_ �!'�� .lye„ r• a�+ ,,,,�� d_ f yi 1 5/ 4/2016 11 ' 34 Ago#, 5, r r 5i 4/2016 11 : 36 I John M.Bredemeyer III, President O�*®f S®(/PTown Hall Annex Michael J.Domino,Vice-President O 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith C Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski �O� Telephone(631) 765-1892 Charles J.Sanders ®l�`, Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 6, 2016 Peter S. Danowski, Jr. 616 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA 1725 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 1000-54-4-19 Dear Mr. Danowski: A review of Town Wetland Permit#7919 and Coastal Erosion Permit#7919C, and a compliance inspection of the above referenced property was performed on May 3, 2016 by the Trustee President and Vice-President which revealed the following: 1) Both permits for this project have expired. 2) Not noted constructed was the 4' wide access path to the beach. 3) Landscape activities on the subject parcel are beyond the scope of the permit and in direct violation of Coastal Erosion Permit condition number 4 found on page 18 in that cleared areas not built upon were not restored with native, non- fertilizer dependent vegetation. Noted was fertilizer dependent commercial sod in the front yard and upon the right-of-way of North Sea Drive, a Town Road and non-native shrubs throughout. 4) A concrete product with sod in between the "cells" appears as a constructed parking surface in the Town right-of way-of North Sea Drive. To avoid a visit from the Bay Constable and an enforcement action, please return to this office with a completed application for an administrative wetland permit that will include plans for native vegetation to meet the provisions of the now expired permits for landscaping within the cleared area. You will also need to secure the appropriate written permission(s) of the Town Engineer/Highway Superintendent for the concrete material in the Town right-of-way. This office has no objection to the prompt removal of all sod and stabilization of such areas with mulch in the interim. Failure to promptly respond to this communication within two weeks confirming your intent to comply will result in referral to the Bay Constable for_enforcement. Sincerely, ohn M. Bredemeyer, III, President Board of Trustees JMB:eac CC Robert & Barbara Bombara Asst. Town Atty. Building Department Town Engineer Highway Superintendent Bay Constable Town Board _ 7 � SUP John M.Bredemeyer III,President pF O �� y�l Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino,Vice-President h ® 54375 Route 25 J�6 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,New York 11971 CA A%c A. Nicholas Krupski G ® Q ,c► y Telephone(631) 765-1892 Charles J.Sanders ®1�c,0u Fax(631) 765-6641 - BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 6, 2016 Robert & Margaret Bombara 98-16 163rd Avenue Howard Beach, NY 11414 RE: 1725 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 1000-54-4-19 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Bombara: A review of Town Wetland Permit#7919 and Coastal Erosion Permit#7919C, and a compliance inspection of the above referenced property was performed on May 3, 2016 by the Trustee President and Vice-President which revealed the following: 1) Both permits for this project have expired. 2) Not noted constructed was the 4' wide access path to the beach. 3) Landscape activities on the subject parcel are beyond the scope of the permit and in direct violation of Coastal Erosion Permit condition number 4 found on page 18 in that cleared areas not built upon were not restored with native, non- fertilizer dependent vegetation. Noted was fertilizer dependent commercial sod in the front yard and upon the right-of-way of North Sea Drive, a Town Road and non-native shrubs throughout. 4) A concrete product with sod in between the "cells" appears as a constructed parking surface in the Town right-of way of North Sea Drive. To avoid a visit from the Bay Constable and an enforcement action, please return to this office with a completed application for an administrative wetland permit that will include plans for native vegetation to meet the provisions of the now expired permits for landscaping within the cleared area. You will also need to secure the appropriate written permission(s) of the Town Engineer/Highway Superintendent for the concrete material in the Town right-of-way. This office has no objection to the prompt removal of all sod and stabilization of such areas with mulch in the interim. Failure to promptly respond to this communication within two weeks confirming your intent to comply will result in referral to the Bay Constable for enforcement. Sincerely, oh n M. Bredemeyer, III, President Board of Trustees JMB:eac CC Peter S. Danowski, Jr. Asst. Town Atty. Building Department Town Engineer Highway Superintendent Bay Constable Town Board • 0 John M. Bredemeyer III, President Town.� Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President ��`�� yam';, 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith w T ,? P.O. Box 1179 A. Nicholas Krupski y'�r ��y Southold, NY 11971 Charles J. Sanders Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 ,I BOARD OF,TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION: .5h� l3 / .3v� V Ch. 275 V Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction / % constructed V Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: G/ r Gl(e q c z)t l S d CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: John M. Bredemeyer III,President �*Of SDUjy� Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino,Vice-President �� l0 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 James F.King,Trustee Southold, New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen,Trustee G Q Charles J.Sanders,Trustee �O • Telephone(631) 765-1892 �iYCoUNM � Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 17, 2014 Mr. Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. 616'Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA 1725 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 54-4-19 Dear Mr. Danowski: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at their Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, September 17, 2014: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants a One-Year Extension to Wetland Permit#7919 and Coastal Erosion Management Permit#7919C, as issued on October 17, 2012. This is not an approval from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, +h John M. Bredemeyer III President, Board of Trustees JMB/amn y.• r • LAW OFFICES PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. 616 ROANOKE AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 (631) 727-4900 FAX (631) 727-7451 E-Mail: pdanowski@danowskilaw.com JOHN R TAGGART,ESQ. jtaggan@danowskilaw.com SEP 1 5 2014 Hand Delivered - September 15, 2014 Town Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Robert& Margaret Bombara— 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold Southold Trustees Permit Nos. 7919 & 7919C Dear Sir/Madam: As authorized agent for Robert and Margaret Bombara, I ask for a one year extension to the Trustees Permit Nos. 7919 & 7919C. Please find enclosed$100.00 fee. Very truly yours, PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. PSD:mmc Encls. cc/Robert and Margaret Bombara John M. Bredemeyer III, President �c�uFFO(,� Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Michael J. Domino,Vice-President a�o� cGy P.O.Box 1179 James F. King ti Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen a ' Telephone(63 1)765-1892 Charles J.Sanders y�01 �� Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATEF INSPECTION: 911 ,311Y X) Ch. 275 Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE _-Y Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: I�'LQ�L�-►, COMMENT : ©t_ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: LAW OFFICES PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. 616 ROANOKE AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 (631) 727-4900 FAX(631) 727-7451 E-Mail: pdanowski@danowskilaw.com JOHN R TAGGART,ESO. jtaggart@danowskilaw.com ... ........ U Hand Delivered AUG 1 8 2014 DO 5outhoic� ,wva.. July 17, 2014 of This Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Robert F. Bombara— 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM 41000—54—4— 19 Dear Members of the Board: I hand deliver a certified and two (2)photocopies of the recorded declaration and covenant pursuant to the Trustees permit with regard to the above matter. Very truly yours, PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. PSD:mmc Encls. cc/Robert and Margaret Bombara CC# : C14-29533 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I, JUDITH A. PASCALE, Clerk of the County of Suffolk and the Court of Record thereof do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed with the original DECLARATION recorded in my office on 07/17/2014 under Liber D00012781 and Page 234 and, that the same is a true copy thereof, and of the whole of such original. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County and Court this 07/17/2014 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK JUDITH A.PASCALE SEAL AUG 1 8 2014 of ?TfI1S efa SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DECLARATION Recorded: 07/17/2014 Number of Pages: 13 At: 01 :17 :34 PM Receipt Number : 14-0092123 LIBER: D00012781 PAGE : 234 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 054 . 00 04 . 00 019.000 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exempt Page/Filing $65 .00 NO Handling $20. 00 NO COE $5.00 NO NYS SRCHG $15.00 NO TP-584 $0 . 00 NO Notation $0. 00 NO Cert.Copies $16.25 NO RPT $60 .00 NO Fees Paid $181.25 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL JUDITH A. PASCALE County Clerk, Suffolk County 12-0104(2/99) 1 2 3 Number of pages I RECORDED 2014 Jul 17 01:17:34 PM TORRENS JUDITH N. PASC:ALE CLERK OF Serial# SUFFOLK COUNTY L DOOO12781 ,Certificate# F 234 !Prior Ctf.# Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed/Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps 4 FEES Page/Filing Fee Mortgage Amt. IlHandling 1.Basic Tax TP-584 2.Additional Tax Notation Sub Total '',EA-5217(County) Sub Total SpecJAssit. Or EA-5217(State) Spec JAdd. R.P.T.S.A. (,�( �� 'z— TOT.MTG.TAX Dual Town Dual Count Comm.of Ed. 5 00 y �• ' Held for Apportionment Affiyw + Transfer Tax Certified Copy Mansion Tax The property covered by this mortgage is Re .Cop y Q �S or will be improved by a one or two family dwelling only � � YES or NO Other � '" GRAND TOTAL —�4— If NO,see appropriate tax clause on page # of this instrument. + `�� y. 5 Community Preservation Fund 2758862 1000 05400 0400 019000 T Consideration Amount $ Date R LPA A IIIIIIIVIIIINiIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIII�IIiII )0 CPF Tax Due $ Date 16-JUL-14 Impro Initialsved �_ Vacant Land ,...�.....Y.. ., address RECORD & RETURN TO: TD TD Peter S. Danowski, Jr. , Esq. TD 616 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 8 Title Company Information Co.Nam �f%. t c.4o Title 9 SUFFOLK COUNTY RECORDING & E ORSEMENT PAGE This page forms part of the attached Declaration and Covenant (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) made by: Robert G. Bombara and The premises herein is situated in Margaret M. Bombara SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK. To In the Township of Southold In the VILLAGE or HAMLET of BOXES 5 THRU 9 MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TO RECORDING OR FILING. (OVER) r ^ ^ ` IMPORTANT NOTICE If the document you've just recorded isyour SATISFACTION OFMOR TGAGE please be aware of the following: If a portion of your monthly mortgage payment included your taxes, will now need to contact your local Town Tax Receiver h bebilled directly for all future statements. Local property taxes are payable twice a year: on or before January lO* and on or before May 31= Failure tomake payments inetimely fashion could result inapenalty. Please contact your local Town Tax Receiver with any questions regarding property tax payment. Babylon Town Receiver ofTaxes Riverhead Town Receiver ofTaxes 200 East Sunrise Highway 200Howell Avenue North Lindenhurst,N.\! 11757 Riverhead,N.Y. 11901 (631)957-30O4 (631)7J7-32O0 Brookhaven Town Receiver ofTaxes Shelter island Town Receiver mfTaxes One Independence Hill Shelter Island Town Hall FarmningwiUe,N.Y. 1l738 Shelter Island,N.V. 11964 (631)4S1-9[K}9 (631)749-]]38 East Hampton Town Receiver ufTaxes Smithtown Town Receiver ofTaxes ]QOpantigmPlace 89West Main Street East Hampton,Ny. 11937 Smithtown,N.Y. 11787 (631)324-2770 (631)36U-761O Huntington Town Receiver pfTaxes Southampton Town Receiver ofTaxes 10UMain Street 116 Hampton Road Huntington,N.Y. 11743 Southampton,N.Y. 11968 (631)351'3217 (631)283-6514 Islip Town Receiver nfTaxes Southold Town Receiver ofTaxes 4ONassau Avenue S309SMain Street 1sUp,NI 11751 SosLbo|d.N.Y. 11971 (631)224'5S80 (631)76S-18O3 Sincerely, _�� __� a. � Judith A°Pascale Suffolk County Clerk dw 2/09 DECLARATION AND COVENANT THIS DECLARATION .made the 4W day of November, 2012, by Robert G M. Bombara and MargaretRombara, residing at 98-16 163rd Avenue, Howard Beach New York 114 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "Declarants"), state as follows: WHEREAS, Declarants are the owners of certain real property situate in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as set forth in Schedule "A" annexed hereto known as Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-54.00-04.00-019.000 (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"); and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of Wetland Permit Number 7919 8v 7919C, the Board of Trustees, Southold, New York, has required that the above men Boned Trustee's Permit be recorded as a notice of covenant and deed restriction of the subject parcel. S e'e- e.cA'191'�- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants have hereunto set their hand and seal the day and year above written. RQERT BOMBARA M R ARE i1 B 1014 —DUK J 10""'I r STATE OF NEW YORK ) s ) s.s.: COUNTY OF 9U+TTYL-K ) On thew of November, 2012, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Roberfbombara and MargareNombara, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, execute the instrument. otary Public JOSEPH EDWARD BRADY Notary Public,State of Ne%York No.02 BR5418800 Qualified in Queens County Commission Expires August 31,20�_.. SCHEDULE"A" All that certain plot,piece or parcel of land, situate,lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Northerly side of North Sea Drive distant 1,675 feet Eastwardly form the corner formed by the intersection of said Northerly side of North Sea Drive with the Easterly side of Kenney's Road; RUNNING THENCE North 50 degrees, 36 minutes 00 seconds West 253.69 feet, more or less,to the mean high water line of Long Island Sound; RUNNING THENCE Eastwardly along said mean high water line of Long Island Sound the following courses and distances: (1) North 45 degrees 35 minutes 07 seconds East 48.18 feet; (2) North 43 degrees 24 minutes 43 seconds East 52.23 feet; RUNNING THENCE South 50 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds East 244. 84 feet,more or less to said Northerly side of North Sea Drive; RUNNING THENCE South 39 degrees 24 minutes 00 seconds West along said Northerly side of North Sea Drive 100 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. x n, 19 r 1 4 James F.King,President ��6OF soUryo Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President ,`O lG 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 � John Bredemeyer G Michael J. Domino O Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 17, 2012 Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. 616 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA 1725 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD -SCTM# 54-4-19 Dear Mr. Danowski: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. on behalf of ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated September 18, 2012, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and specifically inconsistent with the following coastal policies: Policy 4.1 - Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards, 4.2 - Protect and restore natural protective features, Policy 6 — Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem, and Policy 6.3 — Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered the Policies of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: the closest part of the structure is ±180' landward of the approximate high water mark; the New York State Department of 2 Environmental Conservation has already reviewed and issued a permit for the proposed project; the possibility of flooding in the area of the proposed project is minimal; the applicant was granted relief by the Southold Town Board under the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area regulations; the undisturbed portion of the site shall be maintained as a Non-Disturbance Buffer; there shall be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight (8)feet landward of the landward tow of the most landward beach ridge, as shown on the survey; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on October 17, 2012,'at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not detrimentally affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA to construct one single-family residence, pool, and associated water supply, sewage disposal facilities, and a 4' wide access path to the water; with the condition that there be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight (8) feet landward of the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge, as shown on the survey; and as depicted on the survey prepared by Young & Young, last dated August 23, 2012, and stamped approved on October 17, 2012. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) 3 Fees: $ 100.00 Very truly yours, )James F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/eac v =t�, x BOARI)#=0F SOyU rrvv - ! �7�OWl�T3�RUSTEES'�° Mrd , PE f r r f llE.tCT'OBR 17. 2012 ISSUED TO. ,ROBERT$ra ARS,�' rETOMBARA d� .. 1 ... PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1725 NORTH SEA DRIVETSOUTHOLD 3 , SCTM#j 54-t4=19fJ >J,:;rltrr �, _, 4; �UHORIZAT r +tTi dt}.Q ! obit ro a. :. ,�� _ ' 3.:4'.1 t" #e.;f. Pursuant to the protsions of Chapter'275 and/or Cha ter 111 of a xr -odd of'r " ` r Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adsopted at the meeting heldnf October 17 2012,and in consideration of alpplication dee m the sum of$250 00 paid by Robert&Maz azet i J i 9r'3.' '�d f ;f + y Bom aza aiid`'sub�eCt to the Techs and Conditions as stated i the Resolution "W -South TS-1 own l and of Testees a�ut�ionZes and permits the follow ing"' t„ �`t'�r: ,t#Y c#; : fWetl,nd#Permit•to const qct one single-family residence,pool and,associated water"su 1` sews a d13 osat facthtt j i orf+>`'r ' `, ' { ; PP y� g p es, and d wide dccess path to the water• with the condition that there be no structures beyond the project limiting line locatedt'i' t(8) felt I ndwarNdof tbe.lan� ;;ard, Qe of�e Most lan and beac ridgeas shown on the survey; and as depicted on the`survey prepared byYoung&Young,.last da August 23, 2012, and stamped approved on October 17, 2012. IN WITNESSVIiitEOFq the sand Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these esen to be ubscnb'edb. a majority,of the said,Boa;d,as ofhjs.date, p;. is 1 > y .. .., .,, uF r Johrt;,B. edeme er, Absent ;gg rs 1y gk ".Nn Ri M- The Permittee Rbbrert&Margaret Bombara,residing at 98-16:163-' Avenue,A'venue Howard d B each, New York, 11414 as part of the.consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 0.6 1. That.the said a of Trustees and the Town of Southold are relpAsed.from any and,all.,_0 ny' damages,orc11iisfordama s,of suits arising directly or indire&ly�'Ais a result damages, operation performed pursuaht to this permit, and the said Permittee will,at his or her own expense,defend any and all sucfi sAkiniftiat'e'dWy_thira Permittee s assumes full liability with re pert thereto to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Tow'"fi of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months,which is considered to be the esti ipated. -S time required to complete the work involved,but should circumstances warrant,request for 05 an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely;or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved,to provide evidence to anyone concerned that autho ation was originally obtained. 14-1 t 4 ti 4. 1 b d or its. That the vyork.i involved will e subs ect to e inspection and approval of the Boar nyp, agents,and non- 'Cisions'of i originating application may J,0.-cause non-compliance with the provisions all for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. T ; 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation - a 'result of the a swork herein authorized. 6. That there shall beno interference''`w- it tfi�right of the publ'ic o pas and' repass a ong the IN6. NRA: beach between high and tow water marks. 7.11; 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in MSu the location of the work here-in authorized,or if,in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required,upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without exvenses to the Town of Southold. 8. The Permittee is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee peftriit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenihtikid'�I�gd:restriction ec Wt. e t,(90) the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provide.fi,, 0hiq nm t, (90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. 9. Ifiall 136ard-`will ibot f ed by the Permittee of the completionQ0 . . of the work 1 authorized. 10. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required ti supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. 1 7 g11ff0(,� James F.King,President � Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President P.O.Box 1179 0 Dave Bergen w Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyer �� ♦ Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.Domino �D� �a0� Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE.OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO- SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 1 st day of construction A % constructed X Project complete, compliance inspection f� James F.King, President V�*oE SO!/r�o Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G Q Michael J. Domino O �� Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT COASTAL EROSION PERMIT#7919C Applicant/Agent: Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. Permittee: Robert & Margaret Bombara SCTM#: 54-4-19 Project Location: 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold Town Board Granted Appeal Approval: January 4, 2011 Date of Issuance: October 17, 2012 Date of Expiration: October 17, 2014 Reviewed by: Town Board and Board of Trustees DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: To construct one single-family residence, pool, and associated water supply, sewage disposal facilities, and a 4' wide access path to the water; with the condition that there be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight (8) feet landward of the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge, as shown on the survey; and as depicted on the survey prepared by Young & Young, last dated August 23, 2012, and stamped approved on October 17, 2012; and further with the conditions as set forth in the decision of the Town Board dated January 4, 2011, and attached hereto as Exhibit A. INSPECTIONS: Pre-Construction Hay Bale & Silt Fencing Line Inspection; Final Inspection SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (apply if marked) In, accordance with Chapter 111-15 Erosion Protection Structures: N/A A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. BY: JarrFes F. King, Presi ent Board of Trustees EXHIBIT A A. CONCLUSION Therefore 'in the interests of justice and for the reasons set forth herein, this Board grants the applicat relief from Chapter 111 of the Town Code upon the following conditions: «, 1. Aft structures and construction occur-a minimum of 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune depicted on the site plan prepared by Young & Young dated September'21,2010. 2. The erection of a project limiting fence and staked hay bales along the limits of clearing,;grading and ground disturbance prior to the commencement of construction and maintained until completion of construction. 1 -The undisturbed portion of the site shall be maintained as a nondisturbance buffer. 4. All cleared areas not built upon must be restored with native, nonfertilizer- dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer. 5. No pesticides, fertilizers, or simlar.chemicals shall be permitted on site. 6. The installation of leaders,.gutters, and drywells to control runoff from the proposed structures. { The grant(ng of this relief is subject to the conditions of such other permits as the applicant has alredy acquired or may otherwise have to acquire for final approval of the proposed project;, Y�r Furthermdre, this Board finds that the proposal is classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant.to SEQRA Rules and Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Section 617, and that-the Board, as Lead Agency,6, sues a Negative:Declaration for the proposal, with the above conditions. Finagi, this Board fads that this project is consistent with the LWRP pursuant to Chapter 268 of-the Torn Code, Waterfront Consistency Review, so long as the above conditions are adhered to. Dated: January 4, 2011 -18- 21 -Igg qfttorg'i ..1�1-4.� I—— _._lll_._ V' N IN i A— RM. gang, mv Y, I Nve�;,l "WE g-�%jt Rli u� W"g. Ii YIN Q M., 4�1 xv, �z W a:z m N ON MIX MO 4.0 WIP Y, 0 N R AW I Al i gg g�m nm-.-I LI; Pi Iwo, _01 fF V W,il QN0 v 1",. NIN Ok�l go 114 Al" M ZM gi gig e mm RN I W;n 1 -Na""M 'NOV .......... Mi R Im INANN'l q -it N -M"liN RORRI, MI mi,g �74: WA. M4111 M%T�,ewg, k�,g RTO No V$ a INI, ell, g ZVI- mn W� "IN vo Oe- .......... j-'ammuAll,UJIMS,No &.2- ni ii ' 'T7,71 G`Ell' W 7 Fl`,,H11115,11 N" "i DIR GIRIS i Ul J Ca I', 0 BOI Z "I'l F I ;, � L.: , -- mw K �g -RA, gn "U-v VMg- .kg9,. I t - - 5 Rl OMNI NR mmTW?R u R n NO MO 0, M 5N ff: El § mgge. 4. 7' a 'g AN' g Fq, RMNIII� 2 Al ompi NJ OU. zv RUS g -j, SL R 'I", 0� sovn _.,5,vlr,,24NF M WN 2M I WN gkmg.-,a RORK -ms I 101, FA,. OWN ,A,— -7 GoW, g§ _MOMNX , 0 w '41 o7g WIT IN gi � -I wo Or E"I'DENDIVINSAW. I - TO- gv, g;, p-" R Oul 57 N 2 nji., T lows, MR, -�g I R Fa�,. gi -2117 5. g- .Of" p V. 15' WN" Ig Oft Q M. s Ali W gtmg"l ............ .61A ME 'DO .�.,,'- ,.,, m" WORN K, N2 mg gee lqgg 't R§1 0% ANAML BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 7919& 7919C DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 I ISSUED TO: ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1725 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 54-4-19 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on- October 17, 2012,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Robert&Margaret Bombara and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to construct one single-family residence, pool, and associated water supply, sewage disposal facilities, and a 4' wide access path to the water; with the condition that there be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight (8) feet landward of the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge, as shown on the survey; and as depicted on the survey prepared by Young & Young, last dated August 23, 2012, and stamped approved on October 17, 2012. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. /J v John Bredeme er — Absent TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee Robert& Margaret Bombara, residing at 98-16 163d Avenue, Howard Beach, New York, 11414 as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved,but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Pen-nit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. The Permittee is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety(90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. 9. Thai the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 10. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F. King,President q soUly Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President ,`O� �� 54375 Main Road Dave Bergen P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971.0959 John Bredemeyer G �e Michael J. Domino %2 �Q Telephone (6316 765-6641892 Fax �y00UN1Y,Nc� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT COASTAL EROSION PERMIT#7919C Applicant/Agent: Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. Permittee: Robert & Margaret Bombara SCTM#: 54-4-19 Project Location: 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold Town Board Granted Appeal Approval: January 4, 2011 Date of Issuance: October 17, 2012 Date of Expiration: October 17, 2014 Reviewed by: Town Board and Board of Trustees DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: To construct one single-family residence, pool, and associated water supply, sewage disposal facilities, and a 4' wide access path to the water; with the condition that there be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight (8)feet landward of the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge, as shown on the survey; and as depicted on the survey prepared by Young & Young, last dated August 23, 2012, and stamped approved on October 17, 2012; and further with the conditions as set forth in the decision of the Town Board dated January 4, 2011, and attached hereto as Exhibit A. INSPECTIONS: Pre-Construction Hay Bale & Silt Fencing Line Inspection; Final Inspection SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (apply if marked) In accordance with Chapter 111-15 Erosion Protection Structures: NIA A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. BY: , 0�- Janfes F. King, President Board of Trustees EXHIBIT A CONCLUSION Therefore„.in the interests of justice and for the reasons set forth herein, this Board grants the applicaht relief from Chapter 11 I of the Town Code upon the following conditions: 1. All structures and construction occur a minimum of 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune depicted on the site plan prepared by Young & Young dated September 21, 2010. 2. The erection of a project limiting fence and staked hay bales along the limits of clearing, grading and ground disturbance prior to the commencement of construction and maintained until completion of construction. 3. The undisturbed portion of the site shall be maintained as a nondisturbance buffer. 4. All cleared areas not built upon must be restored with native, nonfertilizer- dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer. 5. No pesticides, fertilizers, or similar chemicals shall be permitted on site. 6. The installation of leaders, gutters, and drywells to control runoff from the proposed structures. The granting of this relief is subject to the conditions of such other permits as the applicant has already acquired or may otherwise have to acquire for final approval of the proposed project.", 1; Furthermore, this Board finds that the proposal is classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Section 617, and that the Board, as Lead Agency,Jssues a Negative Declaration for the proposal, with the above conditions. Finally, this Board finds that this project is consistent with the LVW pursuant to Chapter 268 of the Town Code, Waterfront Consistency Review, so long as the above conditions are adhered to. Dated: January 4, 2011 -18_ • • James F. King, President ��OF SOUIyo Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen J [ Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G Q Michael J. Domino %' �0 Telephone (631) 765-1892 � OUNTI, � Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 17, 2012 Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. 616 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA 1725 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 54-4-19 Dear Mr. Danowski: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. on behalf of ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated September 18, 2012, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and specifically inconsistent with the following coastal policies: Policy 4.1 - Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards; 4.2 - Protect and restore natural protective features; Policy 6 — Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem, and Policy 6.3 —Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered the Policies of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: the closest part of the structure is ±180' landward of the approximate high water mark; the New York State Department of 2 0 40 Environmental Conservation has already reviewed and issued a permit for the proposed project; the possibility of flooding in the area of the proposed project is minimal; the applicant was granted relief by the Southold Town Board under the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area regulations; the undisturbed portion of the site shall be maintained as a Non-Disturbance Buffer; there shall be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight (8)feet landward of the landward tow of the most landward beach ridge, as shown on the survey; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on October 17, 2012, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not detrimentally affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA to construct one single-family residence, pool, and associated water supply, sewage disposal facilities, and a 4' wide access path to the water; with the condition that there be no structures beyond the project limiting line located eight (8) feet landward of the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge, as shown on the survey; and as depicted on the survey prepared by Young & Young, last dated August 23, 2012, and stamped approved on October 17, 2012. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) 3 • Fees: $ 100.00 Very truly yours, o'er James F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/eac gt1FFQ(,� James F.King,President q� -pG Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President o P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen s Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyer X41 • Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.Domino 'Ol Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE X Pre-construction, hay bale line 1 st day of construction A)T % constructed X Project complete, compliance inspection SOUTHOLD TRUSTEES No. 71 )9 4 7919 p E R M I T • Issued To Awsibalam /OL147b; 147 Address Pds-`A , Zeo,'ve. SUAI01i THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL.: 765-1892 0 0 James F. King,President 4�gpfFAL t Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 3ti� 54375 Route 25,P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyery a� Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J. Domino �O! �� Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Robert & Margaret Bombara, c/o Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. Please be advised that your application dated September 18, 2012 has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of October 17. 2012 and your application has been approved pending the completion of the following items checked off below. Revised Plans for proposed project XX Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) 15t Day of Construction ($50.00) '/z Constructed ($50.00) XX Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) XX The Permittee is required to provide evidence that the buffer condition of the Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety (90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: Hay Bale & Silt Fencing Inspection Fee = $50.00 Final Inspection Fee = $50.00 TOTAL FEES DUE: $ 100.00 w`atc'h BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees 10/16/2012 01:54 718225 IRENE C VITTI Ele PAGE 01/04 Date:October 16, 2012 To: Southold Town Trustees OCT 1 6 2012 Number of Pages: 4 f j Fax No.: 631-765-6641 7, „es From: Irene C. Vitti PO Box 1337 Southold NY 11971 Re: Matter of Robert G. Bombara, SCTM# 1000-54-4-19 1 am writing to you regarding the subject application for a Tidal Wetlands Permit to be considered at your meeting on October 17, 2012. 1 am the owner of 1930 North Sea Drive, Southold, NY, SCTM# 1000-54-05-45.8, and I live across the street from the proposed project. For all of the reasons stated below and in my previous letter dated August 22, 2007, a copy of which is enclosed, I believe that this application should be denied. Excavating and regrading of this land will cause irreparable harm to the wetlands by destabilizing dunes and causing the erosion of the beach. Adding 300 cubic yards of fill material will adversely affect the already precarious ecological balance of the area by contaminating ground water and introducing invasive species to the detriment of natives such as beach plum, piping plover, box turtle and red fox. Once developed, discharging treated water from the proposed swimming pool will deal the final blow to the viability of these wetlands and the vitality of the surrounding area. Therefore, please consider that granting a permit for the development of these fragile tidal wetlands at the edge of the Long Island Sound will result in the substantial damage to irreplaceable resources, including natural land forms, native species and scenic vistas, much loved and enjoyed by the people of Southold. Sin rely Y rene Cc/n.Vitti 10/16/2012 01:54 718225 IRENE C VITTI Ele PAGE 02/04 � i J Date: August 22, 2007 L OCT 1 6 2012 To: Southold Town Trustees Number of Pages: 3 Fax No.: 631-765-6641 From: Irene C.VIM PO Box 1337, Southold NY 11971 Re: Matter of Robert G. Bombam, SCTM# 1000-54-4-19 I am the owner of 1930 North Sea Drive, Southold, NY , SCTM# 1000-54-05- 45.8,writing to you in response to the above referenced applications for a Coastal Wetlands and Wetlands permits. As an adjacent property owner, and a concerned citizen of Southold, I believe that these Applications should be denied. While I am not familiar with the specific issues before the Trustees at this time, it is very clear that the proposed development of this fragile parcel of land at the edge of the Long Island Sound, which would be the first new construction on North Sea Drive in over 20 years,will result in the degradation and destruction of the dune and beach along that stretch of shoreline, a valuable and irreplaceable resource to the people of the Town of Southold. I am aware that there are many speck grounds to oppose the development of this parcel as proposed, many of which are properly in the jurisdiction of other agencies, including the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation, the Suffolk County Health Department and the Town of Southold, Building Department and Zoning Board of Appeals. However, I call the Trustees attention to my concern that approval of the present Applications at this time will, among other undesirable consequences, result 10/16/2012 01:54 7182250 IRENE C VI1TI Elp PAGE 03/04 In a time consuming and costly process, not just for the property owner, but for the people and offices of the Town of Southold,which is likely to fail, nevertheless. Among these issues are the serious risk of coastal erosion, interference with sensitive plant and animal fife, including an endangered species, contamination of ground water, non- conformity with the character of the neighborhood, excessive lot coverage, and inadequate setbacks,among others- On a personal note, I would like to provide the following narrative of the deep meaning and significance that the subject parcel holds for me, my family,friends and neighbors. I am lucky enough to live in a home with a view of the Long Island Sound in the Town of Southold. In Spring I am delighted to find, on the sandy lot between my window and the shore, the gnarled branches of the squat wild beach plum, Prunus maritima, which becomes smothered in April with tiny white blossoms. By late Summer these prolific racemes of florets give rise to sparse, yet deeply colored fruit, looking more like colossal blueberries, but betrayed as something otherwise by their tart and astringent taste. A short walk on a trail to this narrow and secluded beach rewards me during June and July, with a lovely perfume and the even more wondrous sight of hot pink blooms of the beach rose, Rosa rugose. In August, the round and plump seed pods, appropriately called "hips°that form at the base of these voluptuous blossoms, tum bright red, looking at first like cherry tomatoes and later, as the advancing autumn burnishes them with cooler air and drying winds, like miniature pomegranates. The beach plum and the beach rose were once prolific up and down the northeast coast of the Atlantic Ocean, but now the fragile zone that is the nursery for these gems, is under increasing pressure from over-development of the seashore. Native Americans, Colonists and Depression-era poor, all appreciated the fruit of the beach plum and beach rose as a source of fine nutrition and unique flavors, by turning them into jellies, preserves and syrups for spreads, sauces and toppings and drying them to make tea. Today, this wild bounty provides more than just satisfying eating, it 10/16/2012 01:54 718225W IRENE C VITTI EV& PAGE 04/04 teaches important lessons in the preservation of natural resources, cultural and folk history, and human values. Whether you are an impassioned environmentalist, a weekend beachcomber, a curious cook or a child at play, these diminishing resources provide an inspiration to all who come to shores of the Long Island Sound In Southold. Based upon all of the foregoing, and In consideration of the role of the Trustees to protect the heritage and patrimony of the Town of Southold on behalf of its citizens, I respectfully request that you deny the these Applications for Coastal Erosion and Tidal Wetlands permits. Sincerely yours, Irene C.Vitti • �gpfFO(,� • Peter Young,Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish, Secretary T P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 releRhpneA631)765-1892 7F4x(641),765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council OCT 1 i � j Town of Southold i At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., October 12, 2012 the following recommendation was made: Moved by John Stein, seconded by Audrey Horton, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT WITH A CONDITION of the Wetland Permit application of ROBERT G. & MARGARET M. BOMBARA to construct a single-family dwelling, pool and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities. Located: 1725 North Sea Dr., Southold. SCTM#54-4-19 Inspected by: Doug Hardy, John Stein, William McDermott, Audrey Horton The CAC Supports the application with the Condition the pool backwash is directed into drywells and there is sufficient separation between the ground water flow and the sanitary system. There is insufficient information in the application to make a determination. Vote of Council: Ayes: John Stein, Audrey Horton, Peter Young, William McDermott Motion Carried Nays: Jack McGreevy, Doug Hardy 4}: FFOL k�� P.G-Box 1179 James F King.Pjresident yI y Southold.NY 11971 Bob Ghosio.Jr_Vice-President Telephone(631 765-1892 Dave Bergen s ` Fax(631)76)-6641 John Bredeme}cr p Michael J. Domino Southold Town Board of Trustees Field InspectionNVorksession Report Date/Time: Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. on behalf of ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA request a Wetland to construct one and sewage disposal facilit els•Lresidenceocated: 17251North Sea associated water supplyPermit Drive, Southold. SCTM# 54-4-19 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 _Chapt. 111 _other Type of Application: _Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment —Administrative—Emergency _Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: _J. King _B. Ghosio _ D. Bergen, D enkowski other J. Bredemeyer Michael Domino Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: YOUNG & YOUNG • • Telephone (631) 727-2303 400 Ostrander Avenue Facsimile (631) 727-0144 Riverhead, New York 11901 admin@youngengineering.com HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT,Professional Engineer DOUGLAS ADAMS, Prokssional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST,Architect September 11, 2012 ATTN: Ms. Sherri Aicher NYS Dept. of Environmental ConservationQ f LIE Division of Environmental Permits, Region One f SUNY Campus - Building 40r— Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 � �� SEP 18 RE: ROBERT G. BOMBARA �} at Southold, T/O Southold, New York �`� s (06-0320) Permit No.: 1-4738.-03674/00001 Dear Ms. Aicher: Kindly consider this request, on behalf of the applicant, to issue a modification to the Tidal Wetlands Permit previously issued for the above referenced project. Enclosed are five (5) prints of the Building Permit Survey - Alternate 7 last dated August 23, 2012, together with one (1) copy each of the Tidal Wetlands Permit previously issued on October 20, 2009 and Permit Modification No 2 previously issued on July 20, 2011, for your use. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, TCW/mal Thomas C. Wolpert Encl. cc: Mr. Robert Bombara + Encl. + 1 Set of Prints Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq.. + Encl. + 1 Set of Prints Planning Engineering Land Surveying ^t „qtr j J -z. PHOTO • ROBERTG. BOMBARA AT SOUTHOLD, • SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK OCTOBER00. St �� r Ns �# S �` +� g..t�k�..j; ° k5,�,, ,nli�E�'A��fi�^N� ° { �a"5 s Z '�f A�#Y � S�WY S' �{k fi,t�1`��N,'T „,�..-. xs. 3 � i. `� �t �. .)�� lrr� �; t .. _. -- � - � 1ra � __ _ t._ � ��..�� _ � r i' - 1 � �.. � u.rqP .� ':�';�..�:�i •u a,�^"�' r i�'. .;5 � � � � �: �� / ��• T � h PHOTO • ROBERTG. BOMBARA AT SOUTHOLD, • SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK OCTOBER13,2006 Ll • • 2012 +® RESOLUTION 2011-68 ADOPTED DOC ID: 6510 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 2011-68 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON JANUARY 4, 2011: WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees on October 15, 2008, denied the application of Robert Bombara (the "Applicant") for a permit to construct a single-family residence on the premises known as 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold,New York, under the Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas Law(the "Law") of the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, on November 12, 2008, Mr. Bombara submitted an application to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, as the governing Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review, seeking to appeal the determination of the Board of Trustees, or in the alternative, seeking a variance from the requirements of the Law; and WHEREAS, the Town Board did transmit a copy of the instant appeal to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; and WHEREAS, on January 20, 2009, February 3, 2009, June 2, 2009, and September 7, 2010, the Town Board conducted duly noticed public hearings on the instant appeal with opportunity for all interested parties to be heard; and WHEREAS, that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby finds that the conditional approval of this application is classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Section 617; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold is the only involved agency pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations; and WHEREAS,the Town Board of the Town of Southold accepted the Short Environmental Assessment Form for this action; and WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed pursuant to Chapter 268 (Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold does hereby adopt the Findings and Determination dated January 4, 2011, and conditionally approves the Variance Application of Robert Bombara in accordance with the conditions set forth therein; and be it further Resolution 2011-68 • L, r eeting of January 4, 2011 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby finds no significant impact on the environment and declares a negative declaration pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations for this action; and be it further RESOLVED that the Town Board had determined that, with conditions, this action is consistent with the LWRP; and be it further RESOLVED that this Determination shall not affect or deprive any other agency of its properly asserted jurisdiction, separate and apart from the proceedings under the Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas Law considered herein. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Christopher Talbot, Councilman SECONDER:Louisa P. Evans, Justice AYES: Ruland, Orlando, Talbot, Krupski Jr., Evans, Russell Updated: 1/3/2011 10:32 AM by Lynne Krauza Page 2 TOWN BOARD COASTAL EROSION HAZARD BOARD OF REVIEW TOWN OF SOUTHOLD a In the matter of the Application of ROBERT BOMBARA 1725 North Sea Drive DECISION SMAR 3 0 2011 Southold,NY i SCTM #1000-54-04-19 -------------------------------------------- FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION Based upon the application, documents contained in the Board's file, site inspections and testimony received at the public hearings held on January 20, 2009, February 3, 2009, and June 2,2009 and September 7, 2010, the Town Board finds and determines as follows: ISSUE Applicant has filed an application with the Town Board, as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review(the"Board"), dated November 12, 2008, requesting the following relief: 1. A reversal of the Board of Trustees' ("Trustees") October 15,2008 determination denying the applicant's application for a permit under ;Chapter 1 I 1 Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas of the Town Code, pursuant to :the provisions of§111-25. 2. In the alternative, and should the Board affirm the Trustees determination, the applicant has requested a variance of the provisions of Chapter 111 of the Code as provided in §111-20. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. Description of the property: The property that is the subject of this application is located on the seaward (north) side of North Sea Drive and is between the Long Island Sound and North Sea Drive. It is approximately 24,979 sq. ft. or 6 acre and is located in the R-40 zone, with approximately 100 ft. of road frontage on Nqrth Sea Drive. Unlike many other properties in this area which are developed.wiih single fatnily residences, this lot has never been developed and remains an unspoiled beach area. As confirmed by the Board of Trustees, and acknowledged by the applicant, the property is located entirely within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area ("CEHA") as established by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1 The applicant who purchased the property in 2006 is proposing to construct a single-family residence on this lot with associated garage, pool,water supply and sewage disposal system on this property. B. Trustees Procedural History: I. Applications The applicant first appeared before the Trustees with an application filed in October 2006 which requested a CEHA permit allowing the construction of a 4,138 sq. ft. 2-story house(5-6 bedrooms), with 484 sq. ft. detached garage and 800 sq. ft. pool entirely within the CEHA. In its determination dated December 13,2006, the Trustees denied the application, without prejudice, on the following grounds: 1. The Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council did not support the application because the development was proposed seaward of the CEHA and is prohibited under Chapter 111. 2. The LWRP coordinator recommended that the proposal be found inconsistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program as no construction is permitted seaward of the CEHA and that the proposal was inconsistent with policy standard 4.1, 4.2, and 6.3. 3. That the proposal was located entirely within a natural protective (beach) area; 4. That the proposal was located in an environmentally sensitive area containing valuable habitat valued by the Town for nesting areas for threatened and endangered species and for recharge of the aquifer and the proposed construction would negatively impact an environmentally sensitive area. Thereafter and in July 2007,the applicant revised its plans and submitted three "alternative"proposals to the Board of Trustees as follows: 1. Alternate 1: 5-6 bedroom house comparable in size to the alternative presented to the Board in 2006, with the garage attached and an 800 sq. ft. pool on the seaward side of the home. 2. Alternate 2: 5-6 bedroom house comparable in size to the alternative presented to the Board in 2006, with the garage attached and an 800 sq. ft. pool on the seaward side of the home (sanitary system and shape of the house is different) 3. Alternate 3: A 5-6 bedroom two-story house (approximately 5,238 sq. ft.)on piles with a 512 sq. ft. pool surrounded by an approximate 30 ft. x 45 ft. brick patio. H. Documentation in the Trustees Record Additionally,the applicant submitted the following materials in support of the application: A. 2 1. A report of Dru Associates, Inc. dated October 17, 2007 discussing the environmental impacts from the proposal and concluding that the proposed activity complies with the permit issuance standards set forth in 6 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 505 and that the issuance of a permit for development of the property is "compatible with the CEHA and Tidal Wetlands protection, since the resources protected by either of these programs will remain unaltered by the proposed home. 2. A report from First Coastal, dated October 17, 2007, concluding that the section of shoreline upon which this property is located is "dominated by low profile beach ridges that are vegetated by mature shrubs and tree fronted by a sandy beach and (m)argin of beach grass" 3. An affidavit of John Ehlers, surveyor attesting that there has been no erosion at the site. 4. A coastal assessment report, dated October 2008 and prepared by Applied Coastal Research stating that overall, net change in shoreline position since 1955 has been approximately zero, which does not mean the shoreline did not. move during this time, but suggests that regardless of variation in shoreline movement during this 52-year period, net shoreline location is generally unchanged. The Bombara property is outside the 50-year wave impact zone. The record before the Trustees also contains a memo data October 2, 2007 from Environmental Technician, Heather Cusack and attached data regarding piping plover nesting in the area of the property. The memo indicates that the attached data show a nest east of Kenny's Beach in 2004 and a 2005 map shows a nest between Kennys and McCabe's beaches. The memo concludes that given the nesting patterns, the parcel is a piping plover habitat. Additionally, the memo points out that the State Department of State included the stretch of beach east to McCabe's beach in the Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife habitat. The record before the Trustees also contains a memo discussing the environmental review of the,proposal dated September 17, 2007 which indicates that the lot is located in the CERA and that the natur&i protective features on site include a beach and primary dune. On April 15, 2008, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conducted a site visit to the property wherein the DEC confirmed: "that the landward limit line of the natural protective feature area (a.k.a. the CEHA line) was mapped based on the determination that the primary dune was the most landward natural protective feature. North Sea Drive was built on a portion of this primary dune. During the initial mapping phase which occurred over twenty years ago and was concluded by a public hearing, a decision was made to place the CEHA line along the north edge of North Sea Drive instead of continuing further landward to a point 25 feet from the landward toe." -3- On October 1, 2008, the LWRP Coordinators submitted a written recommendation to the Trustees that the proposed actions were inconsistent with the LWRP standard and that the proposals did not comply with Town Code Chapter 175, Wetlands, and Chapter 111. III. Public Hearing: The Trustees held a public hearing on this application on August 22, 2007 and on October 15, 2008 at which time all those interested were given the opportunity to speak. Peter Danowski, Esq. appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented information in support of the application, the relevant portions of such information is summarized below. Mr. Danowski, pointed out the differences in Alternatives 1 —3 with a prior application to the Trustees by the same applicant that was denied by the Trustees in 2006. Mr. Danowski also set forth certain information regarding the location of the beach area which was verified by the applicant's engineer, Doug Adams of Young & Young. Mr. Danowski also mentioned that the Trustees had granted coastal erosion permits to other property owners in the community, namely, Paskov, Betsch, Von Zubin, Pearlstein, Rosicki and Sonnenborn; and requested that the records of each of those permit applications be incorporated into the Trustees record by reference. Additionally, several members of the public and surrounding community testified in opposition to the proposal. Those comments in pertinent part included the following: 1. That the proposal was inconsistent with the LWRP. 2. The Conservation Advisory Committee's refusal to conduct a full review of the proposal because of its location seaward of the coastal erosion hazard line. 3. Trustees should not allow nearby pre-existing construction to legitimize new construction that is not compliant. 4. The applicant did not make substantive changes to the plan, and therefore should not be considered by the Trustees. At the October 15, 2008 hearing, Mr. Danowski, again appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented the testimony of Mark Burns stating that this particular beach community has experienced accretion as opposed to erosion. Again, several members of the community presented information in opposition to the application including: the potential impact of the rise in sea level and global climate change on the storm surge in the area and erosion; the proposal is located in a primary It is noted that the applicant filed an appeal to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of the 2006 Trustees determination which was never decided,and is deemed moot by the applicant's submission of an alternate application to the Trustees. -4- dune area on a rare virgin beach; and there are endangered species and rare wetlands located on the property. IV. Trustees Determination On October 15, 2008, the Trustees issued a determination denying the Applicant's request (for all three alternatives) for a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Permit based upon the following: 1. The Conservation Advisory Counsel provided comment that the location of the Coastal Erosion Hazard line is landward of all proposed activities, and, as such, a full review of the application could not be conducted. 2. The LWRP Coordinator recommended that the application be found inconsistent with the LWRP because the proposal was inconsistent with Policy 4.1, 4.2, 6, and 6.3. 3. The Board conducted a site visit with the LWRP coordinator, and the New York State Department of Environmental Specialist Robert McDonough, which confirmed that the proposed actions were entirely located seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard line and within a primary dune and a primary dune is a natural protective feature 4. The proposed structures, as applied for, are located on the natural protective feature of a primary dune and governed by §111-13 which prohibits all activities in such areas. C. The Town Board proceeding On November 12, 2008, the Applicant timely filed an appeal of the Trustee's determination pursuant to Town Code 111-25 and in the alternative seeking a variance from the standards set forth in the Code with the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review(the Board). The Board held duly noticed public hearings on January 20, 2009, February 3, 2009, June 2, 2009 and September 7, 2010 at which time all interested parties were given the opportunity to present testimony on the application. Peter Danowski, Esq., appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented testimony on both the appeal and variance request. The testimony presented on the appeal reiterated the information provided to the Trustees as set forth in Section III above. With respect to the variance application, Mr. Danowski requested that the Board consider.the purpose of Coastal Erosion Hazard Law, i.e. to protect property owners from erosion in conjunction with the expert reports entered into the record indicating that this sound front community has accreted. Additionally, Mr. Danowski also incorrectly noted that the Town is required to update the Coastal Erosion Map every 10 years which it has not done. 7 The Town does not have theauthority nor the jurisdiction to change the Coastal Erosion Hazard Map. Pursuant to Chapter 111,the Town must follow the map as established by the NYS DEC. -5- Aram Terchunian, a coastal geologist, also testified for the applicant that the there is no documented evidence of sea level rise in this area and, as such, it should not be considered by the Board. Mr. Terchunian also testified that applicant meets all the criteria for a variance, that the area where the applicant's property is located is dominated by a series of beach ridges that have been deposited over decades and centuries and that granting a variance will not destabilize the dune system. Members of the community also provided testimony in opposition to proposal including: 1. Requests that the Town Board take into account the rising sea level and that the coastal erosion hazard line may be moved further inland in the future. 2. The existence of homes in the area, does not provide a sound basis for granting an approval. 3. A primary dune is a dynamic system and is a natural protective feature under the Town Code. 4. The approval of this proposal with set a precedent for the undeveloped lots in the area. 5. Further construction within the maritime freshwater inter-dunal swale that exists between Goldsmith Inlet and Hortons Point weakens the structure of the land and, as happened in East Hampton, could cause houses to go into the water. On April 3, 2009 the Applicant submitted additional material into the record, though the record was closed, and requested that a decision be issued. As the record was re-opened by the Town Board as discussed below, the content of this letter and its attachment were permitted to enter the record. Attached to this letter was a report of Dru Associates, Inc., Ecological Consultants, which purportedly addressed the public comments. Most notably, Dru As Match 17, 2009 report acknowledged the presence of natural protective features on site and generally stated, without any support or indication of wheit the features were located that the function of the natural protective features would not be altered. Upon review of the record and prior to issuing a determination, the Town Board on April 21, 2009;noted certain deficiencies in the record with respect to the application and determined to the public hearing, to permit the additional materials submitted by the applicant on April 3, 2009 and to enlist the services of En-Consultants, Inc., Robert E. Herrmann, Coastal Management Specialist ("Herrmann")to evaluate potential impacts of construction on erosion trends and on the natural protective features on the property. More specifically, the Town Board requested additional information with respect to whether the proposed construction was located within a natural protective feature, whether any construction could be located outside the natural protective feature; what impacts the proposed and/or any construction might have on erosion trends and the site's natural protective feature and its functions and protective values; and whether and how(i.e. via location, scope design, etc.)those impacts could be avoided or minimized. T On June 2,2009, the Town Board re-opened the public hearing and the record to address the above issues that were not adequately addressed at the January 20, 2009, February 3, 2009 public hearings. A letter from the applicant's representative dated May 29, 2010 was accepted into the record and noted that the applicant objected to the Town Board's reopening of the hearing. Additionally, a recommendation from Herrmann dated, April 20, 2009 was entered into the record which noted a critical deficiency in the record, most notably that the applicant's site plan did not depict the most landward natural protective feature on the site and therefore, that the Town Board could not ascertain the impacts of the proposed construction on the primary dune. Once the landward geomorphic toe and landward regulatory limit of the sand ridge/primary dune was identified, Herrmann could address the questions identified by the Board. At the June 2, 2009 meeting the Board directed that deficiencies in the applicant's plan noted by Herrmann be addressed by the applicant. Thereafter, the applicants' representatives and/or technical consultants met at the property on several occasions with the Town's representative and/or technical consultant to discuss the location landward toe of the natural protective feature. Based upon the agreement between the applicant's consultant and Herrmann of the location of the landward toe of the natural protective feature, the applicant made significant revisions to its plans and, as requested by the Town Board, submitted a an amended application to the Board on July 15, 2010, indicated on the Plan as"Alternate 6." This alternative was for an approximately 1700 sq. ft.(footprint) single-family dwelling on pilings with pool, deck, garage and septic system, with a certain portion of the proposed construction occurring over the landward toe of the natural protective feature indicated on the plan. The revised:plan was forwarded to Herrmann and apublic hearing was duly noticed and scheduled for September 7, 2010. On August 30, 2010, the Town Board received a report from its consultant with the followin recommendations on the Alternate 6 plan submitted by the applicant on July 169: 1. At a minimum any development should be limited in scope and situated so as to avoid all physical encroachment on and disturbance to the geomorphic limits of the primary dune, both during construction and afterward to avoid displacement and/or degradation of the primary dune and that all construction should be conducted 8-10 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune. 2. The applicant could relocate and/or downsize the proposed structures and incorporate additional mitigation measures to avoid degradation of the primary dune and therefore the proposal failed to meet the standards for a variance set forth in §111-20. 3. Impacts to natural resources could be mitigated with the installation of leaders, gutters and drywells. 4. Limit removal of natural vegetation and wildlife habitat and the t potential introduction of fertilizers by requiring that all undisturbed -7- portions of the site be permanently maintained as a nondisturbance buffer; requiring that all cleared areas no built upon be restored with native, nonfertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer and.prohibiting the use of the such chemicals on the site 5. Additional revisions to the site plan presented by the applicant including the identification of the CEHA boundary; the depiction of the regulatory landward limit of the most landward natural protective feature;verification/update of the FEMA boundaries; depiction of a project limiting fence and staked hay bales along the proposed limits of clearing,grading and ground disturbance. On September 7, 2010, the public hearing on this matter was continued and all interested parties were given the opportunity to speak. Mr. Danowski appeared on behalf of the applicants with certain consultants to address the items raised in the Herrmann report, most notably: 1. That contrary to what was suggested by Herrmann, the County Health Department has the same septic system size requirements for two, three or four bedroom homes and their for downsizing the home would not decrease the size of the septic system and would not allow the applicant to move the home closer to the road. 2. The applicant htjs proposed,a;house on piles and a cantilevered deck to avoid heavy equipment on the primary dune and so that there would be no intrusive building of structures within the primary dune area. 3. Mr. Herrmann's report confirmed that there has been no long term erosion on the property. Members of the public,again appeared in opposition to the application and reiterated arguments that were made at the prior hearings. The Town Board closed the hearing subject to comment by the applicant on Mr. Herrmann's report and reserving the Town's right to respond. The applicant submitted a response to the Herrmann report by letter dated September 21, 2010 which set forth the following: 1. There was no reasonable alternative site for the applicant to construct a single family dwelling and urging the Board not require that the location of the house be moved so that a variance would be required by the Zoning Board of Appeals, since the Zoning Board had denied a prior variance application to an adjacent homeowner. Additionally,the area between the proposed structure and the road is necessary to accommai date the installation of a septic system and to provide parking for cars. The applicant also corrected an error in the record, the septic system proposed is for a 3 bedroom house. -8- 2. The applicant offered to plant supplemental native vegetation to further protect the beach area. The applicant also agreed to erect and maintain a silt fence/hay bale construction barrier to protect the area seaward of the piling foundation. The applicant would also consent to a condition that no mechanical equipment would be allowed seaward of the piling foundation area during the construction activity. The applicant would also be willing to plant vegetation under the cantilevered deck. 3. The applicant is willing to limit the introduction of fertilizer and other contaminates and-Will supplement existing seaward vegetation..No clearing will be performed seaward of the j construction area. {� 4. There is no need for approximately 8-10 feet of width on the i seaward side of the structures to protect the dune. 5. The applicant also agreed to install leaders gutters and dry wells; to a condition that would require that the undisturbed portion of the f' site be permanently maintained as a nondisturbance buffer; a requirement that all cleared areas not built upon be restored with k native, non-fertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer; and prohibiting the use of such chemicals on the site. 6. The applicant also submitted a revised survey, dated September 21, 2010 with the changes requested in the Herrmann report. On October 4, 2010, the Board received a letter from Herrmann that confirmed that all changes requested in the August 30, 2010 report had been made by the applicant; that the applicant's consultant had confirmed that grading restrictions mandated by the County Health Department would prevent the sanitary system from being moved closer to the road and that if the proposed development was going to be moved farther from the primary dune without zoning relief, that the applicant would have to decrease or redesign the structural footprint. Herrmann also notes that the applicant failed to provide any j engineering plan and/or construction narrative prepared by a licensed professional to demonstrate and certify how the proposed structures could be installed without breaching the clearing limitation and damaging the dune. r No other comments were received and the record was closed on October 5, 2010. Thereafter and on November 12, 2010, the Applicant requested that the record be re-opened for the submission of a letter to the Board dated October 13, 2010 regarding certain County Health Department Regulations and a letter from Elderco, Inc., a contractor from Port Jefferson indicating the sequence of construction and how said construction sequence would protect the dune. ¢ 4 On November 30, 2010, the Town Board, by Resolution No. 2010-942, re-opened ' the record for thirty days for the limited purpose of permitting the additional information requested by the Applicant to be entered into the record and considered by this Board and i t -9 t allowing sufficient time for comments responding to the additional information supplied by the Applicant. On December 7, 2010, the Town Board forwarded the additional materials submitted by the Applicant to the Town Engineer and Chief Building Inspector for review and comment. By letter dated December 8, 2010, the Town Engineer submitted a response for the record reiterating the recommendation of Herrmann that a minimum setback between eight(8') and ten(10')feet from the landward toe of the dune, despite the proposed construction sequence in the November 8, 2010 letter from Elderco, Inc. The Town Engineer also suggested that the setback include the proposed pool and patio areas and/or any other site improvement that will be constructed with and/or supported by the ground. Finally, the Town Engineer also noted that the proposed cantilevered framing will create the need to access the end of deck framing, the construction of which will ultimately reach out and adversely affect the dune and recommends that all cantilevered construction be limited so that it does not extend over or beyond the designated toe of the dune. On December 28, 2010, the Town Board received a letter from the Kenney's/McCabe's Beach Civic Association stating that the Elderco, Inc. letter submitted by the Applicant that questioned whether said letter would qualify as the requested engineering plan and construction narrative recommended in the October 4, 2010 Herrmann letter, and noting certain alleged errors in the letter. This letter also points out that the content of the Elderco, Inc. letter is so general that it could apply to any building site and that there is no documentation provided by the Applicant to confirm that Elderco, Inc. will perform the proposed work on site. On December_, 2010, the record of the proceeding was closed. APPEAL OF THE TRUSTEE'S DETERMINATION The Town Board confirms the determination of the Trustee's decision denying the application for a coastal erosion hazard permit with certain modifications for the reasons set forth below. The CEHA program sets forth a series of regulated activities that require a coastal erosion hazard permits if such activities are conducted within the CEHA. Regulated activities are defined in §111-6 as: The construction, modtftcation, restoration or placement ofa structure, or major addition to a structure, or any action or use of land which materially alters the condition of land, including grading, excavating, dumping, mining, dredging,filling or other disturbance ofsoil -10- F _ The construction of a new dwelling, without question, qualifies as a regulated activity. Furthermore, there is no dispute that all proposed activity involved in this application occurs within a designated CEHA'and is seaward of the coastal erosion hazard line. As such,contrary to the applicant's argument that he should not have been required to file an application for a coastal erosion management permit because the project activity is all located beyond 100 feet from the Town defined "beach"area,the applicant was clearly required by the Town Code to obtain a Coastal Erosion Hazard Permit prior to commencing construction on the site. Article I1 of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Chapter of the Town Code sets forth the I regulations that apply within coastal erosion areas and requires a permit for regulated activities in §111-8.,:Section 111-8 is followed by specific criteria for the issuance of a i permit in §111-9. Article II also sets forth additional regulations that apply in specific areas of sensitivity (structural hazard area (§1I1-10), near shore area (§111-I1), beach ' area (§111-12), dune area (§111-13), and bluff area (§111-14)). If a proposal is located within a specific area of sensitivity, these additional regulations and prohibitions apply. In this instance, the Board of Trustees properly identified the portion of the property impacted by the construction of proposed single family dwelling as entirely t within a primary dune area.3 This finding was supported by a letter submitted by the Department of Environmental Conservation to the Trustees stating the following: . . . the landward limit line of the natural protective feature area (a.k.a. CEHA line) was mapped based on the determination that the primary dune was the most landward natural protective feature. As such, the State had drawn the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line based upon the presence of a primary dune. There was no evidence in the record before the Trustees indicating anything to the contrary. The applicant's expert reports also note that the area of the property closest to North Sea Drive contains sand ridges (which qualify as dunes under §111-6). Section 111-13(A) of the Town Code sets forth permitted and prohibited actions in primary dune areas: 1. Excavating, grading, or mining of primary dunes is prohibited. 2. Clean sand of a compatible type and size Is the only material which may be deposited. Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit. 31t is noted that the applicant argues in its letter of November 12,2008,that since this area is not located within a beach area,that the Trustees did not have jurisdiction. While the applicant may be correct with respect to the location of the proposed construction in relation to the location of the beach area,the applicant failed to address the Trustee's finding that the proposed construction was within a primary dune rG area and therefore prohibited under§I 1 I-13(Q. -11- 3. All depositions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be placed so as to increase the size of, or restore, a dune or dune are. 4. Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. S. Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on the primary dune. 6. Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their fronting beaches. Section 111-13(C) further states that"[a]ll other activities and developments in dune areas are prohibited unless specifically provided for by this chapter." The construction of a new single family residence does not fall within the activities that are permitted in a primary dune area under§11 I-13(A). Therefore, as determined by the Board of Trustees, the proposal qualifies as "other activities and developments"and is prohibited under§11 1-13(C). Based on the foregoing, the Town Board affirms the determination by the Trustees. While the applicant argues that the Trustees have granted applications for Coastal Erosion Hazard Area permits to similar applications, the Trustees correctly distinguished these prior approvals in that each application involved land that was already developed 1 and not vacant land, as is the case in this application: 1• Pearlstein was granted a CEM permit for a 432 s.f. addition to an existine single family residence, an addition to be constructed on pilings above base flood elevation. No primary dune was identified on the property. 2• Von Zuben was granted a CEM permit for a renovation of an existing single family dwelling, placement of the house on pilings, construction of a new deck, replacement of a sanitary system, removal of concrete walls on property lines, and the construction of a new gravel driveway. Construction was not proposed on an identified primary dune. 3. Rosicki was granted a CEM permit for the construction of a proposed addition and alteration to an existing family residence including a deck and sanitary system. 4. Betsch—was denied a CEM permit initially and was granted a CEM permit only after obtaining a variance from the Town Board. The CEM permit was for the construction of a new single family dwelling and garage, in place of an existing dwelling, to be built on pilings with conditions. -12- I 5. Paskoff was granted a CEM permit to replace a burned out existing structure with a new single family residence with pool. No primary dune was identified where construction was proposed. 6. Litner was required to obtain only a building permit as the additions to the existin home did not constitute a major addition under Chapter 111 7. Sonnenbom received building permits for their home in 1989, prior to the enactment of Chapter 111. Furthermore, the applicant argued and presented information to the Trustees that the property and surrounding area had not experienced erosion and that the area had experienced accretion. This information was irrelevant to the Trustees consideration under Chapter 111. In this instance, once the primary dune area was identified, the Trustees had no authority to consider rates of erosion. The applicant could have used such information before this board to argue its entitlement to a variance and/or to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the entity having authority to move the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The applicant also notes that four alternate plans were submitted and considered by the Trustees,however, each of these plans proposed construction that was prohibited in a primary dune area under §111-13(C). As such, the fact that the applicant submitted alternate plans that downsized the building is irrelevant and could not have been considered by the Trustees. For the reasons set forth above, the Town Board affirms the determination of the Trustees denying the applicant's request for a CEM permit. RELIEF FROM CHAPTER 111 A. Standard for Variance Relief. In the alternative to seeking a reversal of the Trustee's denial of a coastal erosion hazard permit, the applicant has requested variance relief from the standards of Chapter 111 pursuant to §111-20. In permitting the )#oard to grant such relief, the Town has recognized that the "strict application of the standards and restrictions of this chapter may cause practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship." This section goes on to list those criteria that an applicant has the burden of establishing that this Board must consider when contemplating the grant of a variance from the strict application Chapter 111: A. No reasonable,prudent, alternative site is available. B. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity's design ant the property owner's expense. C. The development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage. -13- • M D. The variance requested is.the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. E. Where public funds are utilized, the public benefits must clearly outweigh the long-term adverse effects. B. Location of the Primary Dune and Finding of Unnecessary Hardshiu Prior to proceeding with a determination as to whether or how regulated activities could be conducted on the applicant's property pursuant to §111-20, this Board determined that it would be necessary to identify and locate on the site plan the property's most landward natural protective feature and its landward limit. As noted above,the consultant reports submitted by the applicant refer to the presence of"beach ridges" or"sand ridges"on the property which were readily observed by Herrmann. Section 111-6 defines a dune as a"ridge or hill of loose, windblown or artificially placed earth,the principal component of which is sand." Additionally, §111-6 defines a "Primary dune"as the most waterward major dune where there are two or more parallel dunes" or any dune "where there is only one dune present." According to Herrmann's August 25, 2010 report, which is hereby adopted by the Town Board, the beach ridge identified by the applicant's experts qualifies as a primary dune under§111-6 and, as such, constitutes a natural protective feature. The landward regulatory limit of the primary dune occurs 25 feet landward of the landward toe of the dune identified on the property, asset forth in the definition of a"primary dune" in §111- 6. As discussed in greater detail in the above section, entitled "Appeal of the Trustees' Determination,"new construction is prohibited within a primary dune area(and,by definition,25 ft. from the landward toe of the primary dune itself) and since the proposed construction in alternatives 1-6 as presented by the applicant would have situated new structures within the primary dune area, the applicant could not meet the standards set forth in §111-9. ,: Since the 44 to 54-foot wide area between the road and the regulatory limit of the primary dune is arguably insufficient area to place even a minimally sized dwelling a reasonable distance from North Sea Drive, this Board concludes that the strict application of the standards and restrictions of Chapter 111 has created a practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the applicant. C. Analis of Variance Criteria Pursuant to §111-20 the applicant,had the burden of establishing that he has satisfied each of the criteria listed'therein. As set forth in further detail below,the applicant can satisfy each of the criteria, if certain conditions are met: 1. No reasonable,prudent, alternative site is available. -14- i . The application generally states that there is no reasonable, prudent alternative site because the applicant does not own other property within the Town. However, this standard also requires the applicant to consider alternative locations for the proposed structure on property at issue in this appeal. According to the Herrmann report, should the Town permit the site to be developed the reasonable and prudent location for the proposed structures would be entirely landward of and as far behind the identified geologic primary dune as possible because the dune, which was described by the applicant's consultant(Mr. Terchunian) as "typically very stable" and "dominated by mature vegetation", provides whatever natural protection a dwelling can have on this site. Alternate 6 does propose to locate the proposed structures predominately behind the "landward toe of the most landward beach ridge" as depicted on the applicant's site plan, however, the structures would be located physically adjacent to the beach ridge and the cantilevered deck would extend directly over it. As concluded by Herrmann and the Town Engineer, if the integrity of the beach ridge were compromised or undermined whether during or after construction, a reasonable, prudent, alternative site that situates the proposed structures further from the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge/primary dune is available on the site. The Board finds that there is an alternative location on this property to construct a home that will adequately protect the natural protective feature. The applicant can place all structures 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune. 2. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity's design at the property owners' expense. The applicant argues that Alternate 6, which proposes a house on pilings and a cantilevered deck, adequately mitigates potential adverse impacts within the primary dune area. As noted in the Herrmann report, placing the house on pilings is a requirement of FEMA,the federal regulatory program that protects the proposed structure from potential flood and erosion damage and has nothing to do with the protection of or mitigating impacts to the primary dune area identified on the plan. The July 15, 2010 application(Alternative 6) did not include a discussion of environmental impacts, including potential for causing increased erosion at the site and at adjacent locations; potential impacts on natural protective features and their function and value; and potential impacts on natural resources. In this instance,the most significant need for mitigation is that required to physically protect and presee the primary dune by preventing its physical displacement or degradation both during anrvd after construction(Herrmann report p. 3). While the applicant agreed to place a project limiting fence at the landward toe of the primary dune, a fence could not be maintained at that location during construction of the current proposal because the swimming pool, deck and southwest portion of the dwelling are proposed physically adjacent to and/or over the dune and, the excavation for and the installation of those structures and their foundations would necessitate workers, equipment and machinery accessing the seaward side during construction (Herrmann -15- report page 4). This would ultimately breach the proposed clearing limitation line and would disturb the primary dune. Additionally, after construction there may be loss of vegetation that could result from direct shading by the cantilevered deck that would extend directly over the primary dune (Id.). The Applicant has submitted a letter written by Michael Burner, President of Elderco, Inc., concluding that the proposed construction could be accomplished without damaging the dune and stating that no machinery will be required in the dune area south of the proposed fencing on the landward toe of the dune. However, the Town Engineer, despite review of the statements made in the Elderco, Inc. letter, has reiterated the recommendation of Herrmann that the construction and cantilevered deck and pool be set back a minimum of 8' to 10' from the landward toe of the dune to adequately protect the integrity of the dune to provide a minimal buffer area around new construction and,provide access to the new construction without the need for encroachment into the dune area. Further, the Town Engineer has opined that the cantilevered style of framing will create the need to access the end of deck framing. 4 This Board also notes that the Applicant has not submitted any engineering plans to document and illustrate that the general statements made in the Elderco, Inc. letter are possible on this particular site. As such, the Board agrees with both Herrmann and the Town Engineer that the shading of the dune area will negatively affect the health of the } dune system and that the construction process will ultimately reach out and negatively y affect the dune area. The Herrmann report also identifies potential impacts on natural resources that F include, but are not limited to the permanent removal of certain areas of natural l vegetation; increase in runoff due to displacement of pervious sand soils with structures and impervious surfaces and the potential for introduction of fertilizers and other contaminants. To deal with these potential impacts the Town will require, and the applicant has agreed to take the following measures: L Erect a project-limiting fence and staked hay bales along the proposed limit of clearing, grading, and ground disturbance prior to the commencement of construction and maintained until the completion. , ii. The undisturbed portiori;of the site shallbe maintained as nondisturbance buffer. iii. All cleared areas that are not built upon must be restored with native, nonfertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer iv. No pesticides, fertilizers or similar chemicals shall be permitted on site. The Board finds that the above conditions and further a condition that all structures and construction take place a minimum of 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune will adequately mitigate potential adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values, in accordance with the recommendation of Herrmann and the Town Engineer. t 3. The development will be reasonably safe fromflood and erosion damage. i f -16- The appeal presented by the applicant relies primarily upon technical reports that document the relative stability of the adjacent shoreline for the past 40 years. However, a period of stability along a given shoreline does not necessarily indicate that the shoreline will remain stable, and regardless of its historical trends, any shoreline fronting Long Island Sound is potentially susceptible to flood and erosion damage during significant individual storm events." To make this proposal as reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage as is possible on a property adjacent to the Sound it should be constructed on pilings, which the applicant has committed to, and by placing it as far from the soundand a minimum of 8 feet away from the most landward toe of the primary dune is practicable and will adequately protect the integrity of the primary dune to further protect the structure from flood and erosion damage. Alternative 6 proposes to construct a single family dwelling, deck, and pool physically adjacent to and over the primary dune, which creates the potential for the degradation of the feature and undermines the feature's ability to provide protection for the development and adjacent areas against flooding and erosion. 4. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. The applicant also argues that the single family dwelling proposed in Alternatives 1-5 were relocated and reduced in size in the single family dwelling proposed in Alternative 6, but does not specifically address whether or how the minimum variance relief necessary to overcome the applicant's hardship. Alternative 6 proposes structures physically adjacent to the primary dune, in part to a stated desire to maintain the 40-ft. front yard setback required by the Zoning Code. The development could be shifted farther landward of the primary dune and without requiring a variance by downsizing and/or reconfiguration of the proposed structures. The approximately 1,700 sq. ft. footprint of the proposed two story dwelling is nearly twice the 850 sq. ft. minimum required by Chapter 280, and the swimming pool and deck are proposed on the seaward side of the dwelling. Given the need to balance zoning and environmental restrictions,placing the dwelling closer to the road and/or reducing the scope of the structures, the development proposed by Alternate 6 is more than the minimum relief necessary to overcome the hardship that is the basis of this appeal and the epplicant has not provided any evidence or proof to the contrary. However, if the applicant moved all structures beyond a minimum of 8 feet of the landward toe of,the primary dune,this Board believes that the applicant can construct a single-family dwelling and that this is the minimum variance necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship of the applicant. 4 The applicant has emphasized that this area has not had significant erosion and has actually accreted through this proceeding to support the argument that it is entitled to coastal erosion permit. This Board notes that it is not the authority that draws the coastal erosion hazard line and has no jurisdiction to do so. Chapter 1 I I refers to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map of the Town of Southold prepared by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. While this Board may sympathize with the applicant regarding the stability of this coastline and the lack of erosion over the past 40 years, it cannot remove this parcel from the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area and must apply Chapter 111,as written. -17- rWa A, O 4m t jg � '� A � � ..I w-, memrrr�er•x . 9 ' � a /�m�Da ag �+miE'.�. •avrr �� 'mF ��Y a A rWo �°� ,• •"u rh ' ° 4m u f OD S � bb ykr wa.o� � b D A Jr � P m, m uHo y% h rV Q wwa®f r SUFFOLK © °` eo�n�oin rax Fe-2—ION;:1-10—T mrervce A6enel v R acc54 R-77— m as r I. �r LAW OFFICES PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. 616 ROANOKE AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 x— (631) 727-4900 r,-: z FAX (631) 727-7451 E-Mail: pdanowski@danowskilaw.com f- -- - JOHN R TAGGART, ESO. jtaggart@danowskilaw.com j OCT 262012 ! October 25, 2012 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Robert F. Bombara— 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM 41000—54—4— 19 Dear Members of the Board: I enclose herein a check in the amount of$100.00 covering the cost of the pre- construction hay bale line inspection fee and the final inspection fee pursuant to your notice, a copy of which is enclosed herein. Very truly yours, PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. PSD:mmc Encls. cc/Mr. & Mrs. Bombara 0 0 OFFICE LOCATION: ��q SO(/TyO MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ,�O l0 P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 .f. Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) T Southold, NY 11971 CP Telephone: 631 765-1935 • �O Fax: 631765-3136 Comm LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM OCT 16 2012 w To: Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: October 15, 2012 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA SCTM#1000-54-4-19 Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. on behalf of ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA request a Wetland Permit to construct one single-family residence, pool, and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities. Located: 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 54-4-19 Please see attached. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney OFFICE LOCATION: QF SO(/j MAH3NG ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex �`>�� y0� P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold,NY 11971 ar Telephone:63176&1938 iO Fex:631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner - UL ' 2�1i LWRP Coordinator i Date: July 20, 2011 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for Robert G. Bombara SCTM#1000-54-4-19 On October 1, 2008 1 reviewed the above application and recommended that the action be found INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. The coastal consistency review was revised on September 23, 2008. On June 30, 2011 my office received an LWRP coastal consistency review request for an action titled Robert G. Bombers Building Permit Survey—Alternate 6AI. Procedurally, the action should not be reviewed a second time. The Board in evaluating the action can either agree with the INCONSISTENT recommendation or disagree and render the action CONSISTENT based upon the applicants amendments of the original action and assessment whether the revised action meets or furthers the LWRP policies. If the action is rendered CONSISTENT, the Board shall elaborate in writing the basis for the disagreement pursuant to§ 268-5. Review of actions, item H. which states: H. In the event the LWRP Coordinator's recommendation is that the action is inconsistent with the LWRP, and the agency makes a contrary determination of consistency, the agency shall elaborate in writing the basis for its disagreement with the recommendation and state the manner and extent to which the action is consistent with the LWRP policy standards.... The designated agency(Board of Trustees in this instance) will make the final determination of consistency. The best management practices applied to further or meet the LWRP policies should be referenced in any decision. Cc: Lori Hulse,Assistant Town Attorney OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: I "rows Hall Annex P.O.Box 1179 j 54375 State Route 25 �$u�Foe't Southold,NY 11971 Main Rd.&Youngs Ave. Telephone:631 765-1938 Southold NY 11971 Fax: 631765-3136 O 41 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHtOMT OLD , .To: Jim King,President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry and Scott Hilary, LWRP Coordinators SoflMln%VhWn Date: October 12008 BoBthat 1 ub*es � (REVISED from LWRP review da , Re: Proposed Coastal Erosion and Wetland Permit ROBERT G.BOMBARA SCTM#54-419 Toung&Young on behalf of ROBERT G.BOMBARA requests a Wetland Permit&Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a single-family dwelling,detached garage,swimming pool and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities.Located: 1725 North Sea Dr., Southold. SCTM#544-19 i The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Basedupon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed actions are INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Town of Southold LWRP policy standards and NOT IN COMPLIANCE with Chapter 275,WETLANDS AND SHORELINE and Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS. Therefore,the actions are INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. The purpose of Chanter 275, WETLANDS AND SHORELINE is i to >a� rcti * wetLds in order to msmtaiP and contribute 150110111112 hearca area values pd cG the attributes and f nh sediment control:storm damage o ops floodtro a ion sad renentioa and water pollution control Ia addit' •r. r powin r sot area values arll he mamhined and Protected oreveo ine of flood dams a hmitipg er d by welopmeat in flood hazard areas BR4eP6oP of damage to structures and palatal resources as a result of erosrop protectiop of coastal ecosystems minimizing the impact of uew, t.developmenrestoration and/or expansion on the resource area values hated above §275-3 Findings; purpose;jurisdiction;setbacks. A Purpose. It is the intention of this chapter to ensure for the citizens of the Town of Southold the protection, preservation, proper maintenance and use of its wedands, giving due consideration to the reasonable economic and social development of the Town. In addition, the Town Board declares that it is the intention of this chapter to regulate the type and placement offered and floating piers and docks far the p wetlandsrotection,Preservation,proper maintenance and use of its waters and . Therefore, the Town Board declares that the regulation of the wetlands of the Town of Southold is essential to the health, safety and welfare of the people of the Town of Southold. The wetlands shall be regulated in order to maintain and contribute to the following resource area values and the attributes and functions they possess:protection ofpublic and private water supply; groundwater;flood control; erosion and sedimentation control; storm damage prevention; water pollution control;fisheries;shel h, including spawner sanctuaries; wildlife habliat;agriculture,aquaculture; aesthetics;public access and recreation. In addition, the following resource area values shall be maintained and prolected:prevention offload damage by limiting of development in flood harard areas; prevention of damage 10 structures and natural resources as a result of erosion; improvement of wate- luau protection and enhancement of e� iing vfbition cover in order to maintain water I quality and wildlife habitat:j ,ecti, if wildlife, waterfowl, and plant. iiat an a maintenance of existing populations aqd species diversity; prevention of loss or degradation of critical wildlife and plant habitat; prevention of new stormwater runoff discharge and the improvement of existing stormwater runoff discharges,protection of coastal ecosystems which support the continued viability of harvestable shellfish and finfish habitat; public access to water and land; improvement of groundwater recharge; and the minimization of the impact of new development, restoration and/or expansion on the resource area values listed above. The Purpose of Chapter 111 COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS is to regulate.in coastal areas land use and development activities so as to minimize or Prevent damage or destruction to man-made Property,natural protective features and other ontand resources and to Protect human life In addition,the Purpose of Chapter 111 is to regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to Place them a safe distance from coastal hazard areas i § 1114. Purpose. The Town of Southold hereby assumes the responsibility and authority to implement and administer a Coastal Erosion Management Program within its jurisdiction pursuant to Article 34 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law.In addition, it is the purpose of this chapter to. fA. Establish standards and procedures for minimizing amt preventing damage to structures from coastal flooding and erasion and to protect natural protective features and other natural resources. B. Regulate,in coastal areas subject to coastal flooding and erosion,land use and development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property,natural prolective features and other natural i • resources and to protect human 1 je. C, Regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from areas of active erosion and the impact of coastal storms to ensure that!hese structures are not prematurely destroyed or damaged due to improper siting,as well as to prevent damage to natural protective features and other natural resources. D. Restrict public investment in services,facilities or activities which are likely!o encourage new permanent development in erosion hazard areas. E. Regulate the construction of erosion protection structures in coastal areas subject to serious erosion to assure that when the construction of erosion protection structures is juslifleit their construction and operation will minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property,private and public property,natural protective features and other natural resources. Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. I. Avoid development other than waterdepeadent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. The Proposes!actions do not have a functional relationahiP to coastal waters and therefore' mat a water dependent use Pursuant to§275-2. §275-2 Definitions;word usage. WATER-DEPENDENTfISES —An activity which can only be conducted on, in, over or adjacent to a water body because such activity requires direct access to that water body, and which involves, as an integral part of such activity, the use of the water. The uses include, but are not limited to commercial and recreational fishing and boatingJacililies,finfish and shellfish processing,fish storage and retail and wholesale fish marketing facilities, waterfront dock facilities,shipyards and boat- building facilities, navigation aides, basins and channels, industrial uses dependent upon waterborne transportation or requiring large volumes of co^r%pg 01cessing water and which cannot- isonabO located or operated at an inland site, and uses which primarily prt F get, ]public access to marine or ttdar tiers. a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas,except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. jThe Proposed actions are located entirely within the coastal erosion hazard area and the primary dune, a natural retective feature. Aprimary dome is defined in 111-6 Defia'tions as A natural rotective feature. NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE—A nearshore area, beach, bluff,primary dune,secondary dune or marsh and their vegetation. PRIMARYDUNE— The most waterward major dune where there are two or more parallel dunes within a coastal area. Where there is only one dune present, it is the "primary"ane. Occasionally one or more relatively small dune formations exist waterward of the primary dune. These smaller formations will be considered to be part of the 'primary dune"for the purposes of this chapter. The walerward limit of a primary dune is the landward limit of its fronting beach. Ae landward limit of the i primary dune is 25 feet landward of its landward toe. b. Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. C. Provide sufficient lot depth to allow relocation of structures and maintenance of required setbacks over a period of thirty years. Mite visit oft e Properly of Robert G Bombara CTM#54 4 19 was comdmeted on October 17 2007 In attendance at Weil vert among others,were representatives of the Town of Southold Board of Trustees LWRP Coordinator Mark Terry andNYS DEC s Environment Program Specialist Robert McDonoueh which confirmed that the Proposed actions are entirely located seaward of the CERA line and within a primary dune Psee attached letter rencine the same.dated April 15 200 signed by Robert McDoaou h Environmental Program Specialist Coastal Erosion i Manaeement Section*). i 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features. Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited. A. No development is permitted in natural prolective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. Natural protective features area nearshore areas, beaches, dunes, bluffs, and wetlands and associated natural vegetation. natural protective feature area as defined in 6 111-6 Defiaitiona is a land aad/or water area containing natural Protective features such as a primary dune i NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATUREAREA —A land and/or water area containing natural proteetivejeatures the alteration of which might reduce or destroy the protection e8'orded other lands against erasion or high water or lower the reserve of sand or other natural materials available to replenish storm losses through natural processes. i New construction is prohibited is natural protective feature areas(primary dumel Only nonmaior additions to i existing structures are allowed on primary dunes Pursuant to ti 111-13. § 111-13. Dune area. 4 Dunes prevent overtopping and store sand for coastal processes. High, vegetated dunes provide a greater degree of protection than low, un vegetated ones. Dunes are of the greatest prolective value during conditions of storm-induced high water. Because dunes often protect some of the most biologically productive areas as well as developed coastal areas, their prolective value is especially great. The key to maintaining a stable dune system is the establishment and maintenance of beachgrass or other vegetation on the dunes and assurance of a supply of nourishment sand to the dunes. The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in dune areas: A. In primary dune gree • — (1) Excavating grading or mining of primary dunes is prohibited. (2) Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit. (3) All depositions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be j placed so as to increase the sue of, or restore, a dune or dune area i (4) Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a speck wildlife management activity approved, in writing by the Department. (S) Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pwsuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location,design and potential impacts of the structure on the primary dune (6) Stone revelments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their fronting beaches. The distance from the oroposed actions to the natural protective feature(primary dune) is 0 feet a minimum setback distance of 100 feet is repuired oursKant to Chapter S 2753 Fmdines propose iuriadictioa setbacks Please reaurre Orat the ADDIiCaat amend the application tp meet the above pOlrcies to the oreatest extent practicable minimizine e or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect human life. Policy 6 Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town or Southold ecosystem 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. f A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees lawsand regulations for all Andros patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. §2753 Findings; purpose;jurisdiction;setbacks. Jurisdiction: The following areas are subject to protection under Chapter 275 of the Code of Southold. (1) Any freshwater wetland,tidal wetland,beach,bluff,done,flat,marsh,swamp,wet meadow,bog,or vernal Pool; D. Setbacks. 1) The following minimum setbacks apply to any and all operations proposed on residential property within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees: (a) Wetland boundary. [1] Residence: 100 feet. If the Aaency.Town of Snug-1 of Trratees makes a contrary d 'e ins of consistency,the Agency shall elaborate in writing tke bas. .tr it. agreement with their recomme .tions l want to Chapter 268 Waterfront Consistency Review. §268-5. Review of actions. i H. In the event the LWRP Coordinator's recommendation is shat[he action is inconsistent with the LWRP and the agency makes a contrary determination of consistency, the agency shall elaborate in writing the basis for its disagreement with ithe recommendation and state the manner and extent to which the action is consistent with the LWRP policy standards. Pursuant to Chapter 268,the hoard of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. i i I i i i 4 i I i • Cc: Kieran Corcoran,Assistant Town Attorney Lori Hulse,Assistant Town Attorney LAW OFFICES PETER S. DANOWSKI, SJR. 616 ROANOKE AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 (631) 727-4900 (' FAX 727-7451 E-Mail: pdanowskiwski@danowskilaw.com I'(U�` LS JOHN P.TAGGART ESO. jtaggart@danowskilaw.com LS'n � E J 'la'II AUG 2 4 2012 Hand Delivered ---.-—1 $rf.: �9�i �Gvcfi Po nd ref 7_o,t=. s August 23, 2012 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Robert F. Bombara– 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM#1000–54–4– 19 Dear Members of the Board: I hand deliver three building permit survey plans which add a non-disturbance buffer note as suggested by the Southold Town Board. I believe that you can now issue all necessary permits consistent with this building permit survey labeled"alternate 7" last dated August 23, 2012. Please advise if you need anything further from my office. Very truly yours, PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. PSD:mmc Encls. cc/Lori Hulse, Esq. - Deputy Town Attorney Robert G. Bombara Young & Young N / NOTES Young & Young a AREA = 24,879 50. FT. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 / / • VERTICAL DATUM = N.A.V. DATUM (1988) 631-727-2303 88 Tr9 • SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor a is �P w 2 �`a %{ 3610360154 H LAST DATED SEPT. 25, 2009 Thomas C. Wolp�ert, Professional Engineer W E AV `0W \01p • AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED = 300 G.Y. t Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer x�'�' /, , dcj\°0 • FILL TO BE GLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL / � FROM AN APPROVED UPLAND SITE. Robert C. Tast, Architect • BUILDING FOOTPRINT FIRST FLOOR AREA = IJ-78 50. FT. ° P C, 3.02 /./ � •{ 5EGOND FLOOR AREA = 1,354 50. FT. HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE • ZONING USE DISTRICT = 'R-40' a . E P IN/ R 5 �/ • THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE SITE SHALL BE € a 9 S / / �J ��hry��.cf�' / /`' Qi /"561 MAINTAINED A5 A NONDISTURBANCE BUFFER 2a y o////' /7.54 /8z �Pa 7.62 §§ OOn 19i /�/ / � s.s0/• 18 �" , / �� L�' 0/0 ,10 'C� DKt j4, 3.12 / / // // j..�5 / // //,1 / /7 6� 2 5f'9' Q' / 6''.07 , Ay �qQP doe u / / % / /9.61I�\ �99�.7a �% '�� /^/ ,�`r/." V"Pr 3.07 / %. er, • ♦ � j'7�7YI-Y- SURVORTIFCATION 7 � ; RSG -8° .77 s4a TEST HOLE •7.50BY MCDONALD 6E05GIENGE 39 DATE: 05/11/06 X6.10 7.27 EL-6.45' 0.01 / / o,/ CYT —P,50`�\ � / m/ � �/ / ' .�` s.71 /�� g ' / HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO, 45893 1b EEIkII6 PALE BROWN 1°' 9v� ' / � 'o i B.45 ,`� 7 E FINE TO 7.52 ( (/6.62 \ ` ` �� / / • 5.44 - ` A osnm � 536 6 `,9 �1�� ^ r.N �1 5.4e l: / X /2 18W1 / �\\ I 60 iA�T ,_ ,/ ,// 7 // SURVEY FOR € �' o 6W-165' 4.8' � \ I� — / ••I7 \ _ /�� ROBERT 6. L�VI�1�J"{I`l� O% po° X7.25 // ?6.4 \ /1 \/ // // a 3 / % At Southold Town of Southold < WATER IN vY h , • '? / ° P LE FINE TO 4� �ir rd5 6.7, 5AND s r /3✓�% /// o� Suffolk County, rieW YOrk ac % l�y n %' FE meq- / °Qr County Tax Map District IOOO Section 54 Block 04 Lot 19 Y E . y o i/ \ / $UILDIN6 PERMIT VEY - ALTERNATE 7 <es ti E2�y � � c/9E@S SSANT 5�T\'s �O / .44// s.sa tr P '�' ADDED NONDISTURBANCE BUFFER NOTE AUG. 23, 2012 as ' 2 17 // s3�79� AMENDED// T \ AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA MAR. 10, 2011111 Ifi. 7 // S1�1T of�� AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB. 06, 2011 E_ ' PERCENT ADJACENT AREA COVERAGE /0. /Q i �r� AMENDED BUILDING, PERMIT DATA FEB. 01, 2011Q�s PROPOSED 7 // / // AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 30, 2010s >s Al) faj // (ra (� r,n AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA 5EPT. 21, 2010 ' FRAME HOUSE = 1,354 50. FT. = 5A% / NYSDEAMENDMENTS AUG. Ib, 2010 0 = b �i.ss / 5COH5 AMENDMENTS NOV. 25, 2009 DECK = 128 50. FT. = 0.5% �. / I AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA NOV. 24, 2009 ' 8 kS ' POOL = 251 SO. FT. = LO% = 7.31 � AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA OCT. 30, 2009 g- g o i AUG 2 4 2012 1 AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 14, 2009 .g3 3 TOTAL = 1,733 50. FT. = 6.9% / MAP PREPARED AUG. 17, 2009 01, S p=MOwm T ser = MO N7 Fa 0= STAKE ser A=5—Folmo Sau;hhold Taws SCALE: I"=40'CE=c s sr $e14 O � R^;tG of bu;tr=s JOB NO. 2006-0320 OF I c=cwMueY rsO=rsOOF ver = ooe eLLAR etarnA.rvce �-- --- - DWG. 2006_0182_bp_bom7 s NOTES Young & Young a�;o 2 AREA = 24,579 5Q. FT. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 a 631-727-23039@ • VERTICAL DATUM = N.A.V. DATUM (1985) Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor bang' I . . Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer • SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer ' FINISH®MUNM 5610300154 H LAST DATED SEPT. 25, 200q Robert C. Tast, Architect 0 I HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE a �� o E .S IRWAIt 12'O.G.EA �L�3 I FINISHW 6RADE Ej§gs F YIAMMIZOOFIN6 ;r MEN= bz e� a ��ygpap v � FYCY r a�uF�Fa� $e 9 2-s, SURVEYORS GERTIFIG , ION F REINFORCED WATERPROOF GONG. RETAINING WALL DETAIL ° SCALE: NTS r HOUSE ' y�y ON PILEs ` W. > (4 BEDROOMS) HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L5. . 45595 E FlRST BOORN�Y v EL�16.95 F}X A5✓h> SURVEY FOR 5.00' ,3.00' P t �pu e. BomBA� a FlNUE)GNADE At Southold, Town of Southold _� EL-1D.D EL 98�R D.DD Suffolk County, New YorkEdo EL�9.3 FF r-I � EL=9.2 EL=6.6 �RuG 4'DIA PVC N' MIN. 6' MIN. 6 Mw. County Tax Map District OOO Section 54 Block 04 Lot 9 8b 6' MAX, 12' MAX. 12' MAX. �Rb PIPE 0 2.00% 4'DIA PVC p� }� p�p� �p�/��/ ALTERNATE ' .E.�,'�E y UU PIPE 01.001 E%. EL-6.0 BUILDING f MMIT sw E 1 � AL I LRNATE 1 IE=6.06 IE=J.% Feg 0'� ROw UNE -0 IE=J.a6 IE=7.20 :tN 0 Yg 0.33' EJ--5 .60 + Ei=sfio ADDED NONDISTURBANCE BUFFER NOTE AUG. 25, 2012 ` zL=a.eJ AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA JAN. IT, 2012 1 �`o.6J � AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 30, 2010600 600 SEASONAL `' AMENDED SUILDIN6 PERMIT DATA SEPT. 21, 2010e6.00' -SEASONAL 1.HIGH HIGHNY5DEC AMENDMENTS AUG. 16, 2010GRWND1200 GAL SEPTIC TANK WATER 5CPH5 AMENDMENTS NOV. 25, 2009EL=z.6DAMENDED BUILDIN6 PERMIT DATA NOV. 24, 2009 GRWNDDISTRIBUTION POOLS LEACHING POOLS WATEREL-2.60EL=2.60 (MONOLITHIC) (2 POOLS) (4 POOLS) r -� 1 ---- AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA OCT. 50, 200q a„63 o i i�� AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT, 14, 2009 9rs g 1,--_ �J f' ! MAP PREPARED AUG. I.7, 2009 � tt3 HYDRAULIC PROFILE I(� +� � j'Ad SCALE: NT5 I �' AUG 24 2012 1I SCALE: N.T.S. NJ 11 I JOB NO. 2006-0520 2 OF 2 DWG. 2006_0152—by—rlO LAW OFFICES PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. 616 ROANOKE AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 (631) 727-4900 .1 FAX 727-7451 E-Mail. pdanowskiwski@danowskilaw.com a !+ p JOHN R TAGGART,ESO. jtaggart@danowskilaw.com L AUG - 3 2012 Southhold Town Roard of Trustees August 2, 2012 Southold Town Board of Trustees James King, President Bob Ghosio Jr., Vice President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael Domino Lori Hulse, Esq., Attorney for the Board of Trustees Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Supervisor Louisa Evans,Justice Albert Krupski,Jr., Councilman William P. Roland, Councilman Christopher Talbot, Councilman Jill Doherty, Councilwoman Jennifer Andaloro, Deputy Town Attorney Re: Robert and Margaret Bombara -1725 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM No. 1000-54-4-19 Ladies and Gentlemen: I enclose a building permit survey-alternate 7 for Robert G. Bombara. Mr. & Mrs. Bombara and I have met with Fred Seifert, a local builder, who is prepared to lend his expertise to the building process. Although my clients are of the opinion that the previously submitted plan as filed with the Board of Trustees was compliant with all Town requirements, the enclosed plan labeled "alternate 7" is submitted for everyone's review. Please advise if the Town Board upon review will advise the Trustees that said plan conforms to their last decision. You will note that proposed construction is now set back 8 feet from a line labeled "landward toe of the most landward beach ridge". It is my client's position that all plans submitted complied with the law. I would ask that the Trustees calendar this matter for approval and that the Town Board promptly advise the Trustees of the consistency of this plan with the prior decision of the Town Board. Very truly yours, Peter S. Danowski, Jr. PSD:mmc Enclosure cc/Mr. &Mrs. Bombara Seifert Builders - Attention Fred Seifert Young&Young NOTES Young & Young N AREA = 24,879 50. FT. a � 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 yy /z / • VERTICAL DATUM = N.A.V. DATUM (1988) 631-727-2303 4 �r n / r" • SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor Y 2§y `A' 3610360154 H LAST DATED SEPT. 25, 2009 Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer ��go a b tri J� //� PF�'�Oo°p4 s�0�0�° • AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED 300 G.Y. f Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer g� g W E �/ 0 ,/�' ��A�� r�\o • FILL TO BE GLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL Robert C. Tast, Architect a 0�' q �QY�� FROM AN APPROVED UPLAND SITE. 0 }``�/r 4 / i .�N� w ,�{�� • BUILDING FOOTPRINT FIRST FLOOR AREA = I,1-I5 5Q. FT. '[� �/ 3.02 —/ r'�. SECOND FLOOR AREA 1,354 50. FT. HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE b r�i Ir �b<� , / • ZONING USE DISTRICT 'R-40' x6 v h �/ E / � Ory ry / ' / 5 ,.5.61 r� ,gyp /P / / / �. ./ "yd's .7.ezb O\ 0' �g' // /N/ 5.58~/ � ^h/ 7,54 \ 82 00 olQ"�(1� / / / 6Q10 '�� Q^- 9.82¢\ . o�° s' a 2e �Y /' ,9 i /f'C� �Q'`,py'' Ao0,V }` 00'0 ,'// // / / 5.X5 // / /iy // �1 2 Q/4 Q� "J? ��`6''.0: 2r rr,�,'� / o % /9.6 k` \ 9:za_, / ,•fa /,L r2°•cs �a 1, r� �y X02 J\ Y 'p s` 0 / ,alp' / / / / / / / `� "0 \ �,�0 /�/,�/ / 'px9; A\wr� 3.07 `\b'// ho / / / / / // // —� —9�� \� ].55 -'0 R3BBz� ,� 887' 85— se./ r s. �{ � i 5 — d J�o ! f `�I d� �9y / SURVEYOR 5 GERTI F ATtdN gQ ffi 5o7.7 . / ��' ♦ �d'dl 5.44 / 0 TEST HOLE / ,/ °' sds / � � ` / h°° �^ rP 39 / 'h� 7.50 A&.A- �/ BY WDONALD bE05GIENGE ' - P 7 27 'fi��• h / i \ DATE. 05/11/06 �6.10 / o/ .h_q \ / %' ;. /5.71 /4/21=-, EL=6.45' o.D' HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L5. NO. 45893 / %�� i —\ /'9g\ / �'c "`�a.SS �� ,Co /�s / 6.45 'b ;`. 7 /, //� / •`. ` 'C PALE BROWN •7.52 ( (/6.62 5.44 X 7.2 / �3 c.O �X I S3 'e ;.'/� od ♦r.H S.a<;rx, / / / // a�> 5AND ea ♦ T - "/ / ✓/ 67 // €o � (svU / ` , SURVEY FOR e bW=1.65' 40 %A � I_ _ , ROBERT G. BOMBARA � 7.25 /6.4 / % <' WATER IN �S °p /-y 10 ,'� 7 � 9 Ob !,� y 7 ,// %A ,�"� At Southold, Town of Southold 0 PALEBRDYPI �d 5 r / ,� , ( Suffolk County, New York = � . sF 6.71 / ///-9 V n, 7 FINE ro • 1Q `ke PE %j 0 Fg' Oc 54 Block 04 Lot IG H. ' oSAA� 0�0° G n /,' �` / / UU County Tax Map District 1000 sectD� BREI i (51'01 P�, /� e�%1�� Q .9J 17.07 g 90y /// L, <R$ 'r �;'+`" ss "7y o s> // /� / 2 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY - ALTERNATE I ffs� It,/0 % c/ ��, 59 63 465,58 r Ede Yt J T >s ® / ¢g sMi7 AMENDED BUILDINb PERMIT DATA JAN. 1-7, 201:2 ga 637*7p / AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA MAR. 10, 2011 s /urT/ AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB. 08, 20112 70T g 7� r AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB. 01, 2011 we ,�// m • AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 30, 2010 ae>;g PROPOSED 0 // ��c AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA 5EPT. 21, 2010 i A 7 / /// ( _ _ --- NYSDEG AMENDMENTS AUG. 16, 2010 0 PERCENT ADJACENT AREA GO ? / Q / FRAME HOUSE 1,354 SQ. FT. 5.49'0 ,� 7v / / / ��,{- _ j I 5GDH5 AMENDMENT5 NOV. 25, 2009 DECK 128 SQ. FT. O.5% �� .s6 / \QQo'� ! '41 � ` 1 AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA NOV. 24, 2009 8<a5 POOL 251 SQ. FT. LO% r�2 231 III L.J I AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA OCT. 30, 2009 73- 6 AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA 5EPT. 14, 2009 2r'i,) V MAP PREPARED AUG. I-f, 2009 �„br 3 TOTAL = 1,733 50. FT. 6.9% AIJG _ 3 0._ �� SCALE E). MONUMENT SET MONUMENT FWND 0' =5TAKE SET .=STAKE FOUND NUM JOB NO. 2006-0320 I OF I <b`� O=CHMNEY RO= RooF OVER 5= STOOP CE= CELLAR ENTRANCE o-- SoUth�1C!J ?urr'i DWG. 2006_0182-1py-bom-1 Bciad of Trustees _ �gpfFD(,� • ��ti COGZ Jill M. Doherty,President w Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. -President ,,. P.O. Box 1179 James F. King,Vice Dave Bergen Southold,NY 11971 Bob Ghosio,Jr. '>'/Q �� Telephone(631)765-1892 John Bredemeyer 1 # �' Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only �I _Coastal Erosion Permit Application X Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit —Amendment/Transfer/Extension I SEP i 8K Y Received Application: e A y w - I--.r Y Received Fee:$d'-050Q-�-' �y Completed Application Incomplete Bnnr3 of 7r;;stees i Type Classification: Type IType 11Unlisted _Coordination:(date sent) LWRP Consistency Assessment Form o' l a. CAC Referral Sent / 1-A-_ X Date of Inspection: jgioO l A Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: _Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: /011711 al Resolution: Name of Applicant Robert G. Bambara and Margaret M. Bombara Address 98-16 163rd Avenue, Howard Beach, New York 11414 Phone Number:( ) 718-845-4283 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 54-4-19 1 las Property Location: North Sea Drive, approx. 1 ,675' east of Kenney's Road (adjacent to LIL Pole #14) (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Young & Young Attn: Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. (If applicable) Address: 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 Phone: 631-727-2303 AGENT: Peter S. Danowski, Jr., Esq. Address: 616 Roanoke Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 Phone: 631-727-4900 Ca��\\� C Ord of Trustees Applicatie GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): 24,879 sq. ft. or .6 acres Area Zoning: R-40 Previous use of property: vacant Intended use of property: single family residence Covenants and Restrictions: Yes x No If"Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes x No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands Alternate 21aris X No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. for Alterna e "7" Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmen tal agency? x No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): Construct one sir gle family residence, pool and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities. *d of Trustees Applicatio• WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Construct one single family residence, pool and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities. Area of wetlands on lot: 0 square feet Percent coverage of lot: 6.9+ % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: n.a. feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 198± feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No x Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? 200± cubic yards How much material will be filled? 300+ cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 6± feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: 28 Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: A backhoe will be used to excavate for construction of the house, pool, water supply and sanitary and will also be used to grade the construction site. Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): The proposed operations will not have an effect on the tidal waters. I • . PROJECT ID NUMBER SEAR APPPENDIENDI X C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1.APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME Robert G. BOmbbtLa and Robert G. Bambara Margaret M. Bo:^ ara 3.PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Southold, T/O Southold county Suffolk 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections. Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map Refer to Building Permit Survey 5.IS PROPOSED ACTION: © New ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Construct:.Dne (1 ) single family residence, pool and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities. Alternate No. 7 Young & Young Building Permit Survey last dated August 23, 2012 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially .6 acres Ultimately .6 acres 8.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? FX]Yes ❑ No If no,describe briefly: 9.WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) Fx]Residential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial OAgriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space ❑Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) NYS DEC.' — Tidal Wetlands ©Yes El No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: SCDHS — Water Supply & Sewage Disposal 11.DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes ❑No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: Except tidal wetlands permit for Alternate Plan. 1122.. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? aes Q No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponsor Name Robert G. Bambara Margaret M. Bambara Date: Signature Tial If the action is a Costal Area,and you are a stat ency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT o be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.47 If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAE. Yet Q No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. Yes Q No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) Ct. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic patter,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources:or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a-change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in CI-05? Explainbnefly: C7.-Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly: - - D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? If yes,explain briefly: ❑ Yes I✓ No E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yesexplain: Yes No PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: Foreachadverse effect Identified above,determine whether itissubstantial,large,important orotherwisesignifiicant Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain - -- suffictent detail to show that all relevant adverse imparts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part it was checked yes,the determination of significance mustevaluate the potential impactof the proposed action on the environmental charactetisticsofthe CEA. Check olds box if you have Identified one or more potentially large orsignificand adverse Impacts which MAY occur.Then proceed directly to the FU EAF andfor prepare a positive declaration. Check this box Hyou have determined,based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that lheproposed actio WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental imparts AND provide, on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting thi determination. Board of Trustees p Name of Lead Agency Date President p Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) LAW OFFICES PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. 616 ROANOKE AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 (631) 727-4900 FAX (631) 727-7451 E-Mail: pdanowski@danowskilaw.com JOHN R TAGGART, ESQ. jtaggart@danowskilaw.com OCT 17 2012 Hand Delivered �W J October 17, 2012 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Robert F. Bombara— 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM #1000—54—4— 19 Dear Members of the Board: I hand deliver the affidavit of certified return receipt mailings and the affidavit of posting with regard to the above referenced matter which is scheduled for a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. this evening, October 17, 2012. Ve ruly yours, 1 PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. PSD:mmc Encls. • %%FF014. • ti James F. King, President - Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr. ,Vice-President P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyer Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J. Domino �1 �'� Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1, r� n BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �i . OCT 1 7 2012 --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of ROBERT & MARGARET BOMBARA COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I Peter S. Danowski, Jr, residing at/dba Cutchogue, New York, being duly s�jworn, depose and say: p y Thownas at orthhe a Dive, Southof old, New York,persS`on�a11y1000e54h00 04.00 019 000 by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, October 17, 2012. Dated: October 17, 2012. signatu PEM S DANOW KI, JR. Sworn to before me this 17thday of Oct 20 12 Not u MINDY M.CURVEN Notary Public,State of New York No.4958797 Suffolk County v Commission Expires November 1 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS r 2ji2 f Name: Address: Dennis N. Yuelys & Pauline Yuelys 12 Farview Road, Tenafly, NJ 07670 Bertram Cooper 2080 Town Harbor Lane, Southold, NY 11971 Irene C. Vitti P.O. Box 1337, Southold, NY 11971 Carl F. Scheuermann & 31 Seaward Lane, Stony Brook, NY 11790 Julie H. ScnPuermann STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Mindy Curven ,residing at Aquebogue, New York, , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of October , 2012 ,deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Riverhead, New York, , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT MINDY kRVEN Sworn to before me this Day of October 12012 Notary Public Q��Novse w ao jLj U.S. Postal Servicer, U.S. Postal S icer, ru CERTIFIED MAIL„ RECEIPT Lrj CERTIFIED tvIAIL, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only;No lnsurance Coverage Provided)U Er (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided/ For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comuaC3For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.cam> DennisOFFICIAL USE OFFICIAL USE Ln Er Postage $ Lin Postage $ Ir M Cedified Fee Certified Fee 13 M M RGIUM Recelpt Fee Postmark C3 Postmark E=1 (Endorsement Required) Hem C3 (Endomermarm md) C3 (Erd.Lmem Required) C3 (Restricted Delivery Fee C3 C3 Endorsemert Required) I Ln .0 Car,F. and Julie H. Scheuermann Pauline Yuclys C3 ' •.• •0 Tenafly,NJ 07670 PS Form 3800.August 2006 everse for Instructions PS Form 3800.Au ust 2006 See Reverse for Instructions ruU.S. Postal Servicer, CERTIFIED MAIL,t., RECEIPT U.S. Postal Service,,. (Domestic Mai/Only;No lnsurance Coverage Provided) CERTIFIED MC:jAIL,... RECEIPT ' For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com� CID (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at wvnv.usps come. C3 Certified F:j Ln Postage $ Er lot C3 Ratum Race Pt F Postmark C3 (Encorsement Certiffied Fee ' •- Er " - -livery Fee = e Restricted Postmark C3 (Endorsement Required) Ham M C3 red) Delivery C3 C3 (Encomement Required) Bertram •• •" 2080 Town Harbor Southold,NY 11971P.O. Box 1337 Southold, ce everse lar Inslructlons PS Form 3804 August 2006 Sce Neva sr Gv ire,/„"-/,ors SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTIOM ON DEL'VcV.� ■ Complete Items 1,2,and 3.Also complete Mlsdellveryadd�dlffm Item 4'rf Restricted Delivery Is desired. y', ❑Age nt- - ■ Print your name and address on the reverse e9 so that we can return the cart':. - ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece, B. m . D e ibeliveq or on the front If space permits. / 1. Article Addressed to: D. t em l? ❑_Yes/ If YES,enter delivery addbelbvn. ❑No' Bertram Cooper 2080 Town Harbor Lane Southold,NY 11971 3. Service Type r',cX13)srhfed Mail 0 Express Mail ❑Registered X9 turn Receiptfor Merphandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 0 Yas 2. Article Number 7008 0500 0000 9514 0892 (transfer from service iabeq PS Forth 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 SENDER: COMPLETE Il SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERYi ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete a Si re item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Agent ■ Prim your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Rece' b (P bred!Name) / C. Date Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, - -x,4,1/,y�,A/ b or on the f t if space permits. !l--��'"`/✓ D. Is delivery address different from item 1? Y 1. Article Add to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No -mow Carl F. and Julie H. Scheuermann 31 Seaward Lane 3. Service Type Stony Brook,NY 11790 .•-•Certified Mail 11Express Mail 0 Registered�eturn Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number 7008 0500 0000 9514 0915 (fransfer from service labep PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102585-02-M-1540 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete Reims 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 7 - ❑Agent P.,__ Print your nar@e and address on the reverse t-�-�. �Cddressee r•, Ft 50 that W6 Can return the bard to you. g Received by(Printed Name) C. DatP' I l ■ Attaoh e of Delivery`this card to the back of the mailpiece, — --—_ or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery addressjdlfferent rnrT O Yes " 1 7 If YES,enter delivery ad2 w: 0 No w,f OCT 1 / 2012 � t Ire C. Vitti P-0-Box 1337 - Southold,NY 11971 3. Service Type 'RTUertified Mail ❑Express Mail ❑Registered Illreturn Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Ext,Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number 7008 0500 0000 9514 0908 (f,nsfer Irom service labs PS Form 3811,February2004 Domestic Return Receipt 10259&02-M-two r M t; toard of Trustees Applicato County ofd State of New York Tdl)E t. G. Bmtera and MBrgm:et M. Bmrlsxa BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. nature Robert G. Bambara Margaret M. Bambara SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ..IZO�_DAY OF September ,20 12 4ui� &LCO'J4 tary Public JOSEPH EDWARD BRADY Notey Public.State of New York No.02BR5418800 Quilifled in Queens County R`etnmtesion Expires August 31,20 i Ord of Trustees Appl-icati� AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) Robert G. Bombara and WeXy, Margaret M. Bombara residing at 98-16 163rd Avenue (print owner of property) (mailing address) Howard Beach, New York 11414 do hereby authorize Young & Young Attn: Thomas C. Wolpert and/or Peter S. Danowski, Jr. (Agent) to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board ofTown Trustees on my behalf. (owner' s signature) Robert G. Bombara O oner's ture) Margaret M. a SW001 7Z7 �GIaPC eye s ��1f/ Dry of.� .4>17 (Imdropf ;mac JOSEPH EDWARD BRADY Notary Public,State of New York No.02BR5418800 Qualified in Queens County Commission Expires August 31,20L� 8 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is torQ_ovide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Rombara, Robert G, and Bambara, Margaret M. (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying to the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee X Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other Town Trustees (if"Other�,name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicantlagenVrepresentative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): _A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); _C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this da of� 20. 2 Signature n /l�l'm.t�b(� Print Name "Robert G. Bora a Form TSI Signature: g et . Bambara Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM his y �t a� PROPERTY LOCATION. S.C.Tst THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A T1000 54 4 19 STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN e� > -gfmW- -CeT— CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What Is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? 24,879 g4 ft 1 Wil this Project Retain AN Storm-Water Run-Off (Include Total Arse of al Parcels located within 0.5711 ac. Generated by a Two(27 Inch Rainfall on Site? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (This Item will include et runcB created by she X end/a Ground Disturbance for Lardth (s0•,Aare clearing and/or construction activities as well as al . b. What is the Total Area e7.270 94 Site Improvements and the permanent creation of — nch e proposed 0.1669 ac.g construction sew impervious surfaces.) .rimes) 2 Does the She Plan and/or Survey Show AN Proposed PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT' DESCRIPTION lr v MA Paaa,rN-dw) Drainage Structures Indicating Size&Location?This X ❑ hem shag Include of Proposed Grade Changes and dict Ore (1) Single fatly resi mce, Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion F-1pool and assaaa6al uatEr 9-Wly and 9ELqW and sedtrnent control practices that will be used to X control she erosion and storm water discharges. This dLTcsal fa©lltLes; ChM igxavHIQ)t.S; item must be maintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. 4 will ids Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or Excavation where there is a change to the Natural Existing Grade involving mare than 200 Cubic Yards X of Material within any Parcel? 5 Wli this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand (5,000 S.F.)Square Feel of Ground Surfacer 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Ste? Is this Project within the Trusties Jurisdiction Grersl DEC 8WPPP ReWroments• m within One Hundred(IW)feet of a Wetland or Submission of a SWPPP b mgdred for Y Coramrclbn activNes hvdit ant Beads? dIsbxberhces Drone(1)«mere ahras; khcbdkg dIsbabmest of bas Man one a tad 7 Wil two be She preparation on Existing Grade Stripes am part of a larger con ext pan amt wl ultimately dbwrb one«moa some W land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to X indudYg Construction&*Ad&$kw"V al disbebances W last then one(1)sae where One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? the DEC has determined that a SPDES pe"Is required for storm water dlachergm El (swPPp's shall meet to ARnknum Requirements of die sPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,ParkNhg Areas or other Impervious for storm Water Discharges tom Corotmetlon r>avity-PemhB No.GP•0-10a01.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Of X 1.The SWPPP shat be Papered prior b the sub illal of the Not.The Not shal be into and/or In the direction of a Town rigMof-weyl submittal to tlu Department prior to the camrenoo ent of cornbudbri aWNy. z The SWPPP shat dearbe the erosion and sediment alined practices and where 9 WB this Project Require the Plaeemerht of Materiel, required.postconsbucdon storm WatrMWAPnhrn practices that wt be used andlar Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any cpebucted to reduce am paadants h storm Water discharges and b asrsa Item Within the Town Right-of-Way o Road Shoulder X glance with the terra and conditions of 06 pen it.In addition,the SWPPP Shall Area?Mrs ash will NOTbahe,the kaaswtee a OrimnyMvr.1 quailIdentify f sho.. sources h pges. which may maanhebiy be expected b aged the NOTE: rMy Mawr a Quaaans ohm aroe0h mile%Answemd wMh a CWck Mark quARy W ebnm thaterdiaderga. la a Bot and tiro work ictIon afe disuabaree Is betwsea 5.000 S.F.&1 Asn In ora. a.All S ant shot that prepayrequire tiro posRmmtructon n Professional ro wry mencensed iNearpractice a slormWatr,Grading,Drainage&Erasion Control Plan te Requked by the Town W e«t Is lo"tial ab prepare by a gwand Dea(yh RorSt Storm Water h New. aoud Wil and Mur be submitted for Review Pilar to Issuance of Any Building Permit. tlel Is krhowledpesMa h em prkhdplaa and predkea W Sr«m Water Management PIMM A Chra Me*(.1)MAW New IN each 0AStion Is Requite for a Congkw Alpkmtm) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF..._ K........................SS DOI 4 Adws Cf Y=lg & Yang agent. fizthe That I............::.............._......................:A..........................being duly swum,deposes and says that he//Ac is the appGaaRt-for Penn-64 (risersa WM"kiWft covenant) ent Andthat he/she is the ................. ._................................................._............................................................................. (Owner.Caeecbr.A08 M,Corporate ORny ale) ..•. Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to b or me this; ?............. ........ . .... ol........ ................................20.?? ori Notary Public: .::.. . . ... . . .............. .._.... .............................. ................ . (fie ............ ............... FORM - 06/10 � � Town of Southold • LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 54 4 _ 19 PROJECT NAME The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑x Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees x❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license,certification: x❑ Nature and extent of action: Construct one (1 ) single family residence, pool and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities. Location of action:North Sea Drive approx. 1 ,675' east of •eys Road (adjacent Pole Site acreage: 24,879 sq, ft. or .6 acres Present land use: vacant Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Robert G. Bambara and Margaret M. Bombara (b) Mailing address: 98-16 163rd Avenue, Howard Beach, New York 11414 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) 718-845-4283 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes FO No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands Permit C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. O Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable All proposed construction is situated more than 198' landward limit of tidal wetlands. The proposed first floor of the dwelling is 14.00" in conformance with FEMA rern,;remrits. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No E Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Refer to Policy 1 response Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Refer to Policy response Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria El Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable Refer to Policy 1 response; proposed method of water supply is via connection to existing water main adjacent to property. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. © ❑ ❑ Yes No Not App9ble • Refer to Policy 1 response Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [-] No© Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YesD No x❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIE0 9 Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No x❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No x❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Q Not Applicable PREPARED BY Peter S. Danowski, Jr. TITLE Agent DATE 9/ /12 LAW OFFICES PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. 616 ROANOKE AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 6 (631) 727-4900 f �---``--��_LI FAX (631) 727-7451 !!i —�,_� t E-Mail: pdanowski@danowskilaw.com JOHN P TAGGART, ESO. jtaggart@danowskilaw.com �' `� EP 8 y,12 Hand Delivered B_ September 18, 2012 -� Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Attention: Elizabeth Cantrell Re: Robert F. Bombara & Margaret M. Bombara - 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM#1000-54-4- 19 Dear Ms. Cantrell: Per your instruction, please find enclosed "Wetlands" application,the original and three (3) copes. I understand the Board will act on the Coastal Erosion Permit pending application. The following are also enclosed herein with regard to the above referenced matter: 1. Three copies of the survey labeled "alternate 7" last dated 8/23/12; 2. Three sets of photographs of the subject premises; 3. Copy of letter from Young & Young to NYS DEC regarding submission of application; and 4. Check in the amount of$250.00; Very truly yours, PSD:mmc PETER S. DANOWSKI, JR. Enels. cc/Lori Hulse, Esq. - Deputy Town Attorney Robert G. Bombara Young & Young NOTE5 Young & Young PH: N AREA = 24,51q 5Q. FT. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 $ 1 z / • VERTICAL DATUM = N.A.V. DATUM (1988) 631-727-2303 0 P • SEE FLOOD 145URANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor 6 8g 2_§y vcq' 0.t 3610360154 H LAST DATED SEPT. 25, 2009 Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer ' J /� F P A\W'42 X0'0 • AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED = 300 G.Y. t Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer W E �y/ O /'/, ,� di ,r °j Mvgs • FILL TO BE GLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL Robert C. Tast, Architect / C/) '/�// pY\,��^q4y`� FROM AN APPROVED UPLAND SITE. 11 .40 • BUILDING FOOTPRINT FIRST FLOOR AREA = 1,175 50. FT. 302 / P� -1 SECOND FLOOR AREA = 1,354 50. FT. HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE Q` / A► • ZONING U5E DISTRICT = 'R-40' ae F / ` '` • THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE SITE SHALL BE '�FS �y °T� ��/ �./ y/ �.ss, MAINTAINED A5 A NONDISTURBANCE BUFFER APPROVED BY :a / y 9 / q 5 \ pppTBO��A/�R�D/�O�F�T'R�USST�/E�ELSh i'/ / // 5.5 /6 ^0^�/ //� /7.54 � Y782 � 7.62 IO��(� Vr J�/V1�7VW / / .7s � oDATE O ]1h „ 09 c-pr �rvQ tae 5.65 / / /,y / 7, z fo Q 6.0: ,rr Pp ?i q 12 /611 k\ � � �9za'Eo//4sab/� es y 4, 'i(�� 3 /b, 9 /i o�/ / / / // / / // / / 4� ryD .07 X55 . � 6.o6a9. s.,o` .8.8y' a5 / ve✓ . �. H y / // �o / 5 / / / / — r?o`!�/ ♦ 9, ' % / 5URVEYOR'5 GERTIF CATION g `§ 2e 7.77 s.4a) / TE5T HOLE / �,� / , — / ,j Ga . / o BY MLDONALD 6E05GIENGE / �y/ / I / /�` 'lam' h 5.39 '/ �55� /\2 .7.50 /vy..._1A�, f DATE O5/II/06 !6.,0 / o/ o1pa� .h `. i /, / ,l pYl��/ - / //1r zz7 25S EL.-b.45' OA' / 6 / A ' — 50"\ O/ / /� Q'0� . � 5.71 1 at // /00 5o T , 9 /0 ii.,/ Q / / ��. \ / / / j / HOWARD W. YOUNG,N.Y.5. L5. NO. 45893 gg�u PALE BROYAI / "1/��I { \ /p E FINE TO 7.$2 s.s2 !IS [ Y .GG�r.H 5.aa _ X T2 v WARSE \\x I 13 -8_Jj;.�' o� �. , s.a9,lie /� 3 sIs" / � I 6 L / / °j i eD r - "/ / ✓/ / 0 5URVEY FOR e e �& _ //, ROBERT G. BOMBARA I aw.Lvs' 4e' q� V i� /s.a� �� 1 // WATER IN of h 725 .' 7 \, ' `� / / hey At Southold, Town of Southold o PALE BROM 2d'� Ly oiy \ 5 T _ Y 5 % r/ Suffolk County, New York Fllg TO ay+ , yg A dh, s.71 / ✓r '�5/ /?' QY' vy `c1' Count Tox Mo District IOOO Section W '. WAS e �y'(f G ,. e/, r r FE e y P 54 ai°�k 04 Lot 9 �� -leA0 9� Qz.o7 6 so^fie^ o\ BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY - ALTERNATE I Egg ss 63� � \ // s.5e't'P � m n9 'toxo ' 9�Los SANT ST �s� O / ^o/ ADDED NONDISTURBANCE BUFFER NOTE AUG. 23, 20128 / 5,$/ AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA JAN. 17, 2012 gs ed+79- /$"ANT \ AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA MAR. 10, 2011 !^ W 7 (jT oyia� �. AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB. 08, 2011 PERCENT ADJACENT AREA COVERAGE /0. /4 .r� AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB. 01, 2011 „ 7 // // �'' 0� AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 30, 2010 P g PROPOSED /(//� e� /// // ��c�,,Q"' AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 21, 2010 ° e FRAME HOUSE = 1,354 50. FT. = 5.4% nG� 7 / // / ,�- b _ _ ole NYSDEC AMENDMENTS AUS. 16, 2010 0 r ` SGDHS AMENDMENTS NOV. 25, 2009 DECK = 128 50. FT. = 0.5% AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA NOV. 24, 2009 5` 3 POOL = 251 50. FT. = 1.0% 7.31 --"--- -- - - AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA OCT. 30, 2009 gA AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 14, 2009 <�'g: 3 TOTAL = 1,'133 50. FT. = 6.9% MAP PREPARED AUG. 1.1, 2009 1'6 SEP 1 8 2012 � 4; E]MONIMENT SET 0 =MON NT FOIMD A=STAKE SET A,STAKE FOUTm SCALE: I"=40� fig L=OHIMNEY RO= RDOF OVER 5=STOOP GE=CELLAR ENIRANOE o-- --. JOB NO. 2006-0320 1 OF I P DWG. 2006_0162_bp_born7 S`� s NOTES Young & Young a� € R AREA = 24,879 SQ. FT. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 yya 631-727-2303 q � • VERTICAL DATUM = N.A.VDATUM (1988) Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor 3« S I . Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer • 5EE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer On .69 FINISHM BRAOE 3610360154 H LAST DATED SEPT. 25, 2009 Robert C. Tost, Architect O HEALTH DEPARTMENT U5E § l 05 RE5AR Ir O.C.EY4. z� z FINISHED BRIDE H m 104ATERFR00FINS kc z .15 a15 z€ 5URVEYOR'5 GERTIFIG ION ` REINFORCED WATERPROOF " CON,. RETAINING WALL DETAIL SCALE: NTS ,/ HOUSE ,r.4.L �s 1114 ON PILES (4 BE0ao0MS) HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.5. L.5`NO. 45595 s��W E v° FlEL T1B 95� �3 SURVEY FOR §]�� 00 3�. ROBERT 6MA . BOBAR BNISHEDERADE At Southold, Town of Southold 0.00' 5uffolk County, Neord0 hig EL-9.2MI6 4•DIA PV ❑ ♦: MIN. 6' MIN. 6 MIN. County TQX MQp District 1000 Section 54 Block 04 Lot 19 B� B MA%. ,2' MAX. ,2' MA%. ]' ^ ♦�� u b�/�/ A� rco��w �e §5 PIPE B 2.00f NPE OA1 PVC 12* Ex. EL=6.0 BUILDINb PERMIT i.+V1�YG I TV..I GIVVIT� I E � IE=6.06 IE=J.96 l e$ 0.50' ROW LINE 8 IE-J.46 IE=J.20 j L1 c 0.33' O O N EL=5.60 + EL-5.60 ADDED NONDISTURBANCE BUFFER NOTE AUG. 25, 2012 ` EL-4,87 AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA JAN. 11, 2012 g o.67' AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 50, 2010 S e.oD• aao'-- AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT. 21, 2010 se B.00.--�sEHMNL r sEHI�«lu JIR NYSDEG AMENDMENTS AUG. 16, 2010 GROUND GROUND O 1200 GAL SEPTIC TANK DISTRIBUTON POOLS LEACHING POOLS SGDHS AMENDMENTS NOV. 25, 2009 WATER EL-2.60 WATER EL-2.60 E1-2.66 (MONOLITHIC) (2 POOLS) (4 POOLS) - "`", AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA NOV. 24, 2009 X* I ' ! AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA OCT. 50, 2009 AMENDED BUILDIN6 PERMIT DATA SEPT, 14, 2009 MAP PREPARED AUG. 11, 2009 it 3 HYDRAULIC PROFILEyI`� 1 QQ�: SEP 1 8 2012 SCALE: NTS � � SCALE: N.T.S. $ a" j JOB NO. 2006-0520 2 OF 2cb -- DWG. 2006-0152_bp_rlO s