Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3589APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 31. 199q Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Mrs. Mary J. Mooney-Getoff lq75 WatervieW: Drive Southold; NY 11971 Re: Appl. No. 3589 - Variance Application' (Deadfiled 1989) ~7~"T' 20 · Dear Mrs. Mooney-Getoff: A message was left with our office yesterday-that you have-indicated you may-wish to continue with.a proposal for a subdivision based upon the new zoning designation for your property at the northerly end of Water'view. Drive; Southold~ Since the ~preparation of the sketch revised in November 1986. the zoning and subdivision regulations have been modified substantially. It is suggested that you m&et at the Planning Board Office with Bob Kassner. Site Plan Reviewer. or Melissa Spiro. Planner. in order to obtain suggestions .as to the number of lots permitted on. the entire 6.8 acres and whether or not they would,consider a cluster division. It may be possible that a new layout would be preferable. without the need for variances. The filing fee paid by you in 1986 for a variance would be refunded if no longer needed. ' We hope that this letter will be of- assistance to you. If you have any questions~ please feel free to call either our office (or Bob Kassner at 76S-1938). Very truly yours. CC: Building Department Planning Board Office ( Attn: Bob Kassnor} Linda Kowalski. Clerk Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI JAMES DtNIZIO, JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD -STATE ROAD 25 P.O. BOX 1179 $OUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 FAX NO. (516) 765-1623 June 6, 1989 Mrs. Mary J. Mooney-Getoff 1475 Waterview Drive Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appl. No. 3589 - Variances Dear Mrs. Mooney: As you may be aware, the premises which is the subject of the above application before the Board of Appeals has been redesignated on the newly adopted Master Plan Zoning Update. When your application was filed with this office, the previous Zoning Code was in effect. Since all files will be required to be updated based on the new Zoning Plan, the new provisions of the Code must be used. The same provision under the new Zoning Plan for this new zone district according to our records is shown to be: R-40 Zone District Minimum Lot Area Requirement: 40,000 sq. ft. per lot Minimum Lot Width Requirement: 150 feet Minimum Lot Depth Requirement: 175 feet all as per Bulk Schedule, Article IIIA, Section 100-32A. Please check one of the following two choices, sign and return a copy of this letter as early as possible: { } that you authorize a correction of your application by our office staff with the new Article and Section Numbers (as noted above in the second paragraph) in order to update the same and apply only the same provision of law; OR: Page 2 - Appl. No. 3589 - Mooney-Getoff To: Mrs. Mary J. Mooney-Getoff June 6, 1989 { } that you prefer an update of your Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector on your pending building-permit application, particularly to determine whether or not additional provisions of law apply. Also, you indicated previously a preference that the Board of Appeals schedule your application for a public hearing and make a determination prior to formally applying to the County Health Department and Town Planning Board. If you choose not to amend your subdivision map to comply with the current zoning requirement and wish to proceed on your application at this time, please indicate the same by either a notation on the bottom of this letter or by sending separate communications. We will coordinate your maps with the Town Planning Board for their comments on the general layout under the subdivision regulations and provide you with their response. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Authorized Signature Enclosure (Photocopy of Zoning Map) R-4G R;~8-O R .80 A-C R-' 80, A--C A-C GONIC A-C TOWN OF SOUI'HOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD, ~ / OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIET, SUB. LOT ~ ~ ... ~ND IMP. TOTAL DATE R~RKS h%E BUILDIN% coNDITIoN N~ NOeL BELow ABOV[ FA~ Ac~ Value Per Value Acre ~ PI~ BULKH~D ' '" COLOR - C~io~e PQ'fi'o 0o B. Total Found~ion Basement Ext. Walls Fire Place Type Roof Recmatio~ Room ~ Ihterior. Finish Heat ~.~ ~L~ Rooms Ist Floor Rooms 2nd Floor Driveway TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 0~'~, 0]. ~AL PROM DECISIOhI Of: BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. ~ ~5- ~ DATE .....Z.D:.~.';~ ......... THE ZONING BOARD ~ APP~ FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDI~ INSPE~OR ON · to ~"~ gd-).'~,p~ ~h%'J~¥i-~4 'O'fiV~ .......... §~';~2~' ........................ 0~'"5{~'~;i~';"~;"2~?'~" -- is the 8ddress ng P A ........... ~,A ............................................. [I~ ............... Current Owner Ii,fy J. Moon?;-Getoff Mop No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- REASON FOR APPEAL ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsectlo~ 3 (X) A Variance to the Zoning Ondlnonce requested fat the reaso~ that '~, ~. ~. 10ts smaller than the 26 ~ - b.~elows !th_~o z~ Goose acre lots, woul¢t in no way equal the true value of the re l~t.,o~rt~l~ one 3 ~l~e ~Yaar,ance would'serve t~, g~t'of the Ordlnonc, and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE STATE OF NEW YORK ) Sworn to this .............................................. doy of....~.~.~..~.~.~:: .................. 19oc~ 10 Irving Street N. Valley Stream, NY 11580 May 19, 1987 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall - 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Goehringer: I hope I am addressing this letter to the correct individual. I am writing re - Appeal # 3589 dated 12/1/86 (copy enclosed). As a taxpayer of the lovely town of Southold, I would like to let you know that my husband and I are writing to ask that you please continue to reject application of owner of property at 1475 Waterview Drive, Southold. We concur with the Building Inspector's "Notice of Disapproval" issued on November 28, 1986. I would like to mention that property owner's statement about Goose Bay Estates (underlined) does not apply, as houses in Goose Bay were built before the new law went into effect and many of those homes are just that - summer bungalows. As I was driving home today, I heard on the radio that the "red tide" is again prevalent in the East End waters this year. Whatever the reason - pollution or ?? it is a very sad fact. When we first went exploring the North Fork, my "close-to-the-city" family was thrilled at seeing scallops bubbling up and down in the Bay. For the past few years, not only have the fishermen had a terrible time of it, but we've been so disappointed at not seeing this beauty of nature. Please don't let progress, or whatever it is called, let anything happen to change Southold. Passing of the building law was such an intelligent thing to do. I'm sure the property owner in question will have no trouble selling her property -- "according to law", at a very lucrative price. Yours truly,~ ~ Carmel a Pri nci pato Lawre ' HAROLD M. GORDON, M.D., MARC S. KAUFMAN, M.Do January, 10,1987 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Petition of Mary J. Mooney-Getoff of 1475 Waterview Drive, Southold for a variance to the zoning ordinance to sub- divide a 2.4 acre parcel on Cedar Avenue (part of th~6.75 acre parcel for which 1475 Waterview Drive is the address) into 4 lots of approximately 26,500 sq. ft. each. We oppose the reqm~est for the following reasons2 1. After thorough study by appropriate town authorities and consultants, this area of Southold has been desig- nated as 2 acre zoning. This decision was no,made capriciously but after proper investigation o~land use, density, water requirements, and many other factors. It would be improper to over-ride the judgement of this body. 2. Down-zoning the property will lead to similar demands from adjacent and nearby property owners who have land to develop and will result in dense housing on 1/2 acre plots6this ecologically sensitive area. In fact, the applicant owns 4.4 additional acres extending to and including much waterfront on Goose Bay which ~ould, of course, be similarly sub-divided, once precedence has been set. HAROLD M. GORDON, M.D., P.C. MARC S. KAUFMAN, M.D. -2- V 3. The property in question lies adjacent to and up- hill from mine. Since one could expect 4 houses to be erected on 4 lots, the result would be 4 more wellst 4 more septic tankst 4 more paved areas, all of which may have deleterious drainage effects on my property, and one could also expect increased use of fertilizers and pesticides on lawns and gar- dens- which would also drain toward my property. Moreover~ one could expect four two-story houses to be built uphill in ascending fashion, resulting in visual pollution and obstruction to sky and land- scape. 4. Although "hardship" is the grounds on which the variance is sought, I do not believe "hardship" exists. The explanation for"hardship" is the diff- erence between the sum of money which could be acquired for four 0.6 plots as compared to that for 2.4 acres. Since the value of the latter alone is substantial (probably in excess of $100,000) this cannot be considered hardship. Moreover the value of the remainin~ 4.4 acres could be conserve- vatively estimated at ~00,000. This does not con- stitute hardship. I hope that you will not grant this variance. Most sincerely, 1305 Cedar Drive Southold, N.Y. 11971 January 10, 1987 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Sirs: Mary Mooney Getoff has been a delightful person to have as a neighbor. She is always willing to help others. Now, at a time when she needs a helping hand, we would like to help her. We would like to state that we cannot see any harm in dividing her property in order to make ends meet. Let's be for it! Sincerely yours, Franklin and Doris Johnson Martin V. Burrows 103 Glider Avenue Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 January 5, 1987 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, N,Y. 11971 Subject: Petition of Mary J, Mooney - Getoff to subdivide a 2.4 acre parcel on Cedar Avenue in 4 lots of approximately 26,500 square feet, My property is located adjacent to 1475 Waterview Drive, Southold, New York. I have no objections to the above property being subdivided. Respectfully, Martin V, Burrows MVB/pyv 1270 Cedar Drive Southold, NY 11971 January 6, 1987 Zoning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Zoning Board: We live approximately 250 feet from the property Mary Mooney-Getoff would like to divide up into building lots. We have no objection to her doing this. There is a vital need for affordable lots in this community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Susan and Peter Young SCY:hrs 1475 Waterview Drive Southold, New York 11971 December 26, 1986 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Sirs, , I haVe received your letter of December 15 requesting clarification es to the number and ~ize od the lots proposed in the variance I am requesting. As indicated on the survey which accompanied my application, the 2.4 acre parcel to be set off would be divided into 4 lots of approximately 26~500 square feet each. There would be ~ 50 foot right of way running north from Cedar Avenue. Two of the lots border on Cedar Avenue; the other two are north of those. Each lot varies slightly in size and shape as there ia °nly one absolutely square corner on the parcel but the # lots are carved out of the 2.4 acres as equitably as possible. If any further clarification is needed, kindly let'me know. Thank you for your assistance. P.S. In regard to (c), I do not have input or comments from the planning Board to forward to you. I explained to Linda Kowalski that I was financially unable to pay the fee for 4 lots required to submit an application simultaneously to the Planning Board. As the fees are not refundable if the request is denied, it is too much money to gamble if the ZBA denies my request. Mrs. Kowalski was going to explain my problem to the ZBA in this regard. Melvin Ortner 995 Clark Place Woodmere, L. I. Oak Avenue Goose Bay Estates Southold, N. Y. 11791 December 18, 1986 Chairman, Board of Appeals Main Street Southold, N. Y. 11971 Re: Application of Mary J. Mooney-Getoff 2475 Waterview Drive Dear Sir: Although I can understand Mrs. Mooney-Getoff's hardship, I cannot see how the Board of Appeals can grant a variance to permit the construction of four homes in lieu of one. Over the past few years, town consultants made a complete study of the area and decided to up-zone to two acre plots. One of the reasons they picked in their study to up-zone was I am sure our water problems. There is no cormmunity water that services our homes. We all have private wells that now provide good clean water. With four new homes, and the possibility of another seven homes that could be built to the south of Mrs. Mooney-Getoff's vacant land if the variance is granted will our water be as clean? What do they plan to do with the sewerage - pump it into the ground which may cause all sorts of problems to our wells? Think about the additional traffic that these four new homes and then a possible seven additional homes would generate. You must realize that if this variance is granted you cannot stop the subdivision of the rest of Mrs. Mooney-Getoff's land in the same way. I ask you to think of the precedent you will set if this application is granted and the money spent over the years for the zoning study. I see no unusual and peculiar conditions that permit you to grant this appliction and I believe it will be detrimental and will alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Sincerely, Helen Schwan $outholcl Town Board of' Appeals NAIN ROAD- STATE RoAD 2,5 5ouTHOLD, i.l., N.Y. 1'19'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765 1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN cHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. sERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DouGLASS JOSEPH H. SA~NICKI December 15, 1986 Mrs. Mary Mooney-Getoff 1475 Waterview Drive, Box 377 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appeal No. 3589 (Variances) Dear Mrs. Getoff: ThiS letter will confirm that the Board took the follow- ing action at our Regular Meeting held December ll, 1986 in the above matter: RESOLVED, to temporarily hold in abeyance Appeal No. 3589 - Mary Mooney-Getoff yariance Application pending the following: (a) receipt of action from the Suffolk County Health Department concerning Article 6 (after formal application);; (b) clarification in writing by you as to the number and size of lotS proposed by this variance; (c) input or comments from the Southold Town planning Board (after formal application). YourS very truly, lk cc: Planning Board Building Department GERARD P- CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OFSOUTHOLD December 1, 1986 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 3589 application of Mary J. Mooney-Getoff fro a variance. Also included is Notice to Adjacent Property Owner; Notice of Disapproval from the Build- ing Department; Short Environmental Assessment Form; letter relative to NYS Tidal Wetlands Land-Use; and survey. Judith T. Terry Southold TownClerk RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK DEC, 01~AL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING iNSPECTOR Tow~ Clerk Southold TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. APPEAL NO. ~ '~- DATE .......'~. ~'...].. ~... ;;; ......... Name of Appellon:t Street and Number ..... a,....,Lo.~,.~.....HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ..................................... DATED .....~:....°...v..ci~.!!%~:A..~...L~...~.2',? ....... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) ( ) (X) hary J." "~ hooney-~ boff Name of Applicant for permit of 1475 ',.!aberview brive, Southold,,New York Street and Number Municipali~ State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY PE hloolOz: 'I0 SUBDIVIDE~,T~m° ~o O~n ~v i ~nr-AT~n~ n~'r'Nl: PRC~PFRTY Celare 2venue (part o:r the 6.75 acre parcel is N~e add~ess ~ ~ ................. A~?~ Current ~ner ha?y J. [loone-~-Ge-~off Mop ~o. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article I~ ooct~o~ 106-~0 ~nd ~rt~clc~ III~ oect~oh 100-~1 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for ( ]0 A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... ( ) (X) ( ) REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that Form ZB1 (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEA Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or ur{neces- sary HARDSHIP because none of bbc properties adjoining mine ar~, t~,7o acre lots. Nest of 'bbc lots in the neizbborhood are sm~ll lots. It would be difficult to sell a large lot in bh~s neighborhood. People who could a~ford a 'b:¢o acre lot, or e,~en a me acute lot, ~.,ould not wish to build the more e:{pensive bathe herc suited bo st:ch a large lot in a neighborhoo¢] where t~ost of bl'le homes were oris. inally summer bungalows (those in Goose Bay Estates) on lots small_et~ th;an th~ 26~500 ;~uare feet indicated b.~e ~ lots in the proposed subdivision. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because o~ my ~ersonal fimonc-[.al ~i%uatio~. I do not Nave a pans!on fro3 any source. :~or raany yea~s I ~ave planne~ on selli~S off lobs, as m~ed, ?,hen I ~e:;c', retir,~me?; aC in 7 years, in order %o Pin~nc~ ny retirement. The restriction of s~gling this whole desirable piece in only one lot~ or in t~o lots~ ~.~ou]_d severely my ability to s}ll it at all~ stance many sNaller lots a~e available throughont tbs township Nut young ~am~lies and retirees could In additio~, the ~'nou'ct that one could ask for a t~,o acre lot, or two acre lots, uou!d in no way elual the true vslue o~ the prope,~bll if it could be sclc i~ s~aller lo~s~ as ! did some yoa'~5 back to Xo~arek and John~o:'~ also or~ Cedar Aw'hue. Tl-ore is no h'ay the5 ~uyo~e would pay apprecia'ted value of one c:~ those lots~ ti:~es ~ ~cP the 2.ff so'Po pa~-oel I no:' ';i~d~ to s 1!. I :~ act a c]~.veloper~ thJs ~:-; th~ fa~:~ily ho:~ast:~d 3 The ~or once w6u[~ obs~Fve the"sN~t'of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because ~b~ lobs p~(Do~ a~c ~3~l?r l;h~,t ]~7' off so~?,?aat larger tharl ~y lot?, ~"~!Ck a:!jo~n [;his pT:.p~-?'~ on its -hh~ee side° . STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY ........... Sworn to this / .............................................. day of .... ~,~..u..~. ................... 19 Noto'ry ~)ubli~ ..... ~ ....... UNDA J. COOPER ~ Notary Publk~, State of New Yo~ _ / - No. 4~.225e3. Suffolk Coumy~/ mrm Expire8 December 31, 1L..~_~ BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter oT the Petition of ~ary J. Mooney-Getoff to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY 09~ER YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. Th~intention of the undersigned to pe. tition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a ar~(Special Exception) (Special Permit) (Other) [circle choice] ). 2. That the pr..op.e~LV I~hifh is tl~e subLect, of the ~etiti. qn i%l~cate~ adjai;en~, to your property and is des- cribed as follows: l~'/9~aservlew ~rlve~ DOU~DOIGs iqew York 3. That the property which ~the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: 'bo subd'[v~.de a 2°4 acre parcel on Cedar Avenue into 4 lots of appro×imately 26, 500 square feet each. 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code aoplica, ble t~o th[r.~ef~ough.t by t~Te~l,n~l:- signed are Article I Secti~ 106-20 an~ Article ±±± ~ec~lon ±uu-p± [ ] Section 280-A, New York Town Law for approval of access over right(s)-of-way. 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you ma)' then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 765-].809. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the'date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Travelor-Mattituck Watchman, new~papem published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative ha~e the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner (. Owners'Names: Mary J." ---Mooney-Getoff Post Office Address Box ~77 Sm~tbold .. New York l 1971 (Te]. (516) 765-3~56 ) NAME Helen Schwan Melvin Ortner Edwin E. Tuccio Gilbert Pinkham Joseph & Rose Petruzziello Margaret Komarek Peter McPartland Roy Wilkinson Martin Burrows Dr. Harold Gordon Harold Reese, Jr. Franklin Johnson ATTAC~-~~~S CERTIFIED MAIL RECE ADDRESS 454 Powells Lane, Uestbury NY 11590 995 Clark Place, Woodmere NY 11598 313 West Main St., Riverhead NY ll901 ll Greenway Drive, Huntington NY ll901 9 Dumond Place, Glen Head, NY 11545 c/o D. DeNardi, 539 Broad Ave., Leonia NJ 07605 50 Davlson Ave., Lynbrook NY 11563 1603 Waterview Drive, Southold NY 11971 103 Glider Ave., Riverhead NY llg01 23 Dillon Dr., Lawrence, NY 11559 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook NY 11563 Cedar Lane, Southold, New York 11971 STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) M ary J. Mooney-Getoff ,residingat 1475 Waterview Drive S~th~l~: N~w Y~k , beinB duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 4 ~t day of'f)~m h~ .19 ~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re' verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of $outhold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- fice at . ~.1~1 rl ~ ~ T'~lr ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by Sworn to_before me th's / . day of ~, 19 _~.__ N~ary Public Term F-.~alres Oeeeml~' $i; i$.LLL3 (This side does not have' to be completed on form transmitted to adjoining property owners.) STATE OF h~EW YORK SPUNTY OF SUFFOLK Mary J. Mooney-Getoff, residing at 1475 l~;aterview Drive, Southold, New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 1st day of December, 1986 deponent.ms,led in the same envelope: 1. Notice to adjacent property ownerr of petition to request a special exception to operate a bed and breakfast home o Notice to adjacent property owner of petition to request a variance to subdivide s 2.4 acre parcel on Gedar Avenue into 4 lots to each of the 12 adjacent property owners listed on the attached copy of the notice to sent to request a variance. The certified mail receipts for the 12 envelopes are attached to the bed and breakfast copy of the notice sent, submitted also on December l, 1986. Envelope were mailed at the Southold, New York Post Office by certified mail. Sworn to_before me this day of ~Y~ ~ 1986 NOtary PublSb ! 63 059 659 GEF~II:I[' D M ./ P 263 059 657 ~ECEIPT FOil C~ ~rlFIED P 263 059 658 P 263 g59 662 263 059 655 : ~C,{ CER[IFIED MAIL 263 059 665 l'~:"~cS: x~Z,;.~u:,,',~ P 263 059 661 P 263 059 663 P 26:] [i!;9 664 263 059 !'~5Li FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF 5OUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTIIOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ................................ .I. 9.7.~... ~. ~.~o...0 ~ ..... ~~...~.~... !,.,~.~., ........... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated...~.. ~.. ~ ~ ..... LocationofProperty '/~"/~ .. "'''~' .~~~0~. House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . .-..0.7...~. ..... Block .... ~ '] ....... Lot ...~'~..q ........ Subdivision .................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No .................. is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds . .(~-~'~ .'~'...~.e.~:~./.O. ~ ~...~.~.: .~..~/..~.~ ~.. o~ .~. RV 1/80 'Fhe ;t.Y.S. [nvironmental Quality Ih:view Act requires sub- · -:-,'-~:. mission of thick%form, and an en,]ironment~ review will be .':.,, .',-.~ , .. . . made by ~his ~rd before any action is :,.,'~'~ ,' ' '~ ' ~ ' ' ~NORT r~VIRO~.~E T~I ASS~Sq~R'T rOpN '' "q~'..'/ . .[ ~ '.;..,.. ,.....: . . ...~...: . . . .... . . . . . . , . ..,~. ~[~<: ~: ..... · (a) ~n ~rder %o answer the question~ tn thl~ ~hort gAF I~ 1~ ~d '-.i' .":,.... '.'.' .... pr~Farer will u~e currently available ~fo~t~cn conce~ing the ~roJ~c~ and 'h, ' ~;:~'~.~' '~,':~.?..'.' : ~,'" l~ely ~c%: of the action. I~ l~ no: ~ectcd gha~ addl~loral ~%udl~z, ro~ar~h · ?:, ~'.~','C'~"q"~:.}[%~,,~ , ' (b) ~f any que:%ion h,~ been answered Ye~ tho nro~oc% ~- ~.* -----S-J-':-<?'C'~'~'''''~ · .,,....., ~ -', · , . . ....... ... . . ...... ,.$~} ~.- ..,-.:,,.;.::..:~..~F~.,~;, q... (c) If all que5%ion~ hava been an:wored No 1% lm likely %km% thl: n~o~..- · "P-'.~ .::~l;J~:'l:~ ";'(.'~-n~-'-. '.:,;' ~;.'..'."~ %~n 10 acren of land? , · * · · · · . .... ':" '." ' v., ~2.' '..,:je~.;~::.:,. '"L"' 3. W~i project alter or Mve a large effoc~ on '.'.'".' · .,,.~,.~., ~.~ .,:'~ an oxl~tln$ body of wa~r? . . . , . . . , . . . Ye~ :,...,, · A. W~I proJec: have a po:onglally laro ~ ~ on " '.%l~:~}''ch .... . . · · - ' '. -i~;~;]*fJ ,":.h'7 ... on ad]acen~ 3itch? - , . - . ' , ".'/:f:" ~''" 6. ,1!1 project affect any %~ea~ened or endangered ,' ' / .. plant or anirnl ~pecles? . , . . . . . . , · * ' Yes 7.Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? , . . . , . . · , · · 8. Will project have a major effect on vl~uol 9. Will project adversely ~pac% an~ site or ute of hl~:oric, pro-hl~orlc, or 10. W~i project have a m~Jor effoc~ cn exi~%~g 11. Will project r~sul% In mmjor %raffle problems 12. Will p~ojoct reg~arl7 cauae objectionable ocor:., 13. Will project have any l~apac: on pub).lc health or / ~afetT" *" ' ' * * * · . . iL. Will projec~ fiffeC: %he exlJtlnf coazunlty by period c~ have a major ne~a~lve effcc~ on Is there public conj. rlvlrs7 ccncerntnH thc prose--~ Ye~ '' l ~. ~ ~o 6-" '" " Yes _ 'fee '>: ,~,': "'~ _ Yee ~ ?Io '"' ' ' j .... ,.. Yes No 12-1'85 (Tod~y'2 D,~a) To: Southo!d Town Board of Appeals ' Main Road Sou~hold, NY 11971 Re: Appeal Application of .~;!ar.7 J..I~]ooneu-Getoff Location of Property: _~,~c %~. .... 4~ ~,~ ~.qn,~tholdx. HY Dear Sirs: · .In reference to the New York State Tidal Wetlands Land-Use R~gulations, 6 NYCRR, Part 661, and Article 25 of the New York S~ate. Environmental Conservation Law, please be advised tha~ th subjec~ property iQ the within appeal application: (please check one box) [ ] ~lay be located 5¢ithin 300 feet of tidal wetlands; ho%.;ever, constructed alon% the water-lying edge of this propeuty is a bulkhead in very good condition and at least 100 feet in length. ~ [ ] May b'e 'located wikhin 300 feet of tidal wetlands; however, constructed along the water-lyinc ed%e of this property is a bulkhead in need-of¢ (minor) (major) repairs, and amor~ximatety feet in length. ~ ' [ ] not appear May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; ho:{ever, constructed alone the water-lying d=e of this property lsa bulkhead less than 100 feet in length. May be located within 300 feet of tlda! wetlands; and there is no bulkhead or '' ~-~,, _ con ..... wa!~ exis~inc on the premises. Is not located withiu 300 feet of tidal Wetlands to the best of my knowledge.* [Starred items (*) indicate your property does to fall within the jurisdiction of the N.Y.S. D.E.C.] Sincerely you~ ~, NOTE: If proposed project falls t¢it'~kin [~.E.C. juri'~ic~on, approval must be received an.d submit~6d to our office before your application can be scheduled fo£ a public hearing. Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- November 29, 1973 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to erect a bus shelter in front yard area of property on the northeast side of Waterview Drive, Southold. The findings of the Board are that applicant resides in a wooded area and his children have a few hundred feet to get to the school bus. The applicant wishes to have the children sheltered from bad weather while waiting for the bus. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED, Louis Getoff, Waterview Drive, Southold, be GRANTED permission to erect a bus shelter in front yard area of property located on the northeast side of Waterview Drive, Southold, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: That the shelter be placed at least 5 feet from any property line on the north side of Waterview Drive. It is further understood that this is a temporary permission subject to being rescinded at any time in the future. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen Grigonis, Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1855 - 8:45 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Stanley Garren, Nakomis Road, Southold, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk and Parking Schedule for. permission to divide lot with less than required area. Location of property: Nakomis Road, Southold, bounded north by Nakomis Road; east by L. W. O. Property Association; south by E. M. Pearson; west by A. H. Van Denheugal. Fee paid $15.00.