The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-7890 James F. King,President �pF SO(/jh, Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold, New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer H Michael J.Domino • O Telephone(631) 765-1592 I� A. Fax(631) 765-6641 C�U , BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 17, 2013 Mr. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. PO Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: BRIAN DEBROFF 271 GLOAMING EXTENSION, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 10-9-14 Dear Mr. Neilson: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at their Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, July 17, 2013: WHEREAS, Docko, Inc. on behalf of BRIAN DEBROFF applied to the Southold Town Trustees for an Amendment to Wetland Permit #7890 and Coastal Erosion Permit #7890C under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, application dated July 2, 2013, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the application be found to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, 2 • NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVE the Amendment to Wetland Permit#7890 and Coastal Erosion Permit #7890C to remove the existing +/-58 linear foot mortared stone seawall and replace it in-place using larger stone; and install a 10' wide non-turf buffer landward of the seawall; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., last dated June 17, 2013 and stamped approved on July 17, 2013. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $0.00 This is not a determination from any other agency. Sincerely, `� James F. King, President Board of Trustees JFK/amn 10-FT NON-TURF BUFFER BACKFILL WTH EXCAVATED MATERIAL (TYP) r * EXISTING MORTARED STONE SEAWALL 58sLF LAWN #` ; ' # TO BE REMOVED and REBUILT USING LARGER STONE 75sGY OVER 250±SF AM. I TOP ELEVATION 6.4±FT(MATCH RETURNS) R " NEW FILTER FABRIC(TYP) B©ARD t3F TRUSTEES r „ TO� EXISTING ROCKS(TYP) 1 n� A-1Wv5HW DATE �' � MHW 131 y .fk ` BOTTOM SEDIMENTS. NGVD - . • . r .: SAND�GRAVEL �— ': ALWL. , F 11�PIC a L `�EGTIOIV. FISHERS ISLAND GRAPHIGSCA-E V=5' UTILITY COMPANY INC. 5 4 s 2 i o 5 N HARBOR U11 � � o ULDER(IVF) GII TOP- EXISVNG MORTARED STONE 5S AW,44I 53rLF WALL 5.4 TO BE REMOVED and REBUILT USING LARGER � STONE 75±<:;Y OVER 250±6F N EDGE OF 0 _ - ROGKY SHORE 4'CLAY PIPE -- ��-ITI= 1 PROPERTY OF s DEBROFF PIER E SEAWALL. �� 10-FT WIDE NON-TURF BUFFER TO s '.. CONCRETE RET E I ♦ . WDLL=5.8 - e � D _ J U L - 2 2013 :NiF PROPeRTY BENGHMARK I.ROD - ELEVA710N=795 Southold own SURVEY by G.M.E. PROJECT. DOCK I"IODIFIGATIONS and SEAWALL ELEV ARE BASED ON NGVD 1929 REPAIR REVISED 9-21-12 T.O.S. REUSED 7-03-12 T.O.S. LOGATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN d SOUTHOLD TIE-OFF PILES D COASTAL EROSION SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK REVISED F iJL HAZARD AREA WATERWAY: WEST HARBOR-PIRATES COVE ADDITIO KE) REVISED 7-09-12 DEC DATE: FEBRUARY 1,2012 0 C $ 0 FLOAT SIZE APPLICANT: BRIAN DEBROFF TF� REVISED 8-17-12 DEC * ? 9 * AGENT: SHEET 3A OF 4 �— p� TIE-0FFS ff FLOAT cl LOG. ING. 2 Kehth B.Nellson,PE 0 Q. REVISED 9-17-12 T.O.S. R P 0 R Mystic,GT 06355 �Bggg2•� AT DIMS.g REPLACEMENT 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 �qOF NpX PIER SUPPORT PILES EMAIL PermImrA docka.com DWG 12-2-2365 Kei+h 8.Neilson,Docko Inc. 6/27/20131204 PM Debro(f_3E_AmenCment3wg h TY Peter Young,Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish, Secretary P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 �'�0 �' Telephone(631)765-1892 1 Fax(63 1)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., July 10, 2013 the following recommendation was made: BRIAN DeBROFF to Amend Wetland Permit #7890 and Coastal Erosion Permit #7890C to remove mortared stone seawall 58 If. and rebuild using larger stone 75 cy. over 250 sf. Located: 271 Gloaming Ext. Fishers Island. SCTM#10-9-14 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. SUFFUC,� lances F. King.President ,4�Q� COG P.O. Box 1179 Bob Ghosio..Ir.. Vice-President j day Southold.NY 11971 Dave Bereen Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer Fax(63 1)765-6641 Michael J_Domino Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report Date/Time: /J i o �v/ 3 1 ).eo a / /�' 1 ` Docko, Inc. on behalf of BRIAN DeBROFF requests an Amendment to Wetland Permit #7890 and Coastal Erosion Permit #7890C to remove the existing +/-58 linear foot mortared stone seawall and replace it in-place using larger stone; and install a 10' wide non-turf buffer landward of the seawall. Located: 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island. SCTM# 10-9-14 Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 _other Type of Application: Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment —Administrative—Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: �J. King B. Ghosio D. Bergen, ✓j Bredemeyer Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: OFFICE LOCATION: OF SO(/j�O MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ,�O l� P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 .If. .f. Southold, NY 11971 (car. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) '! T 002 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 7pp Fax: 631 765-3136 iY, ��y00UNNc� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM JUL 1 1 2013 U. To: Jim King, President Town Town of Southold Board of Trustees oard Southold oldof wn tees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: July 9, 2013 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for BRIAN DeBROFF SCTM#1000-10-9-14 Docko, Inc. on behalf of BRIAN DeBROFF requests an Amendment to Wetland Permit #7890 and Coastal Erosion Permit #7890C to remove the existing +/-58 linear foot mortared stone seawall and replace it in-place using larger stone; and install a 10' wide non-turf buffer landward of the seawall. Located: 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island. SCTM# 10-9-14 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed actions are CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com DC E I V E DD Ju ne 27,2013 EJ31 Mr.James King Southold Board of Trustees P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE:DeBroff Property,Fishers Island Project Description Dear Mr.King, Following up on my recent conversation with Ms.Elizabeth Cantrell from your office,I am providing this additional information regarding the construction methodology for the DeBroff seawall reconstruction project, as well as a modified LWRP tailored specifically for this work. The project is necessitated because of the collapse of the existing stone wall caused by Hurricane Sandy. This existing structure was built of small stone mortared together and appears that it may have been built in phases since there is a difference in the size of stone near the bottom of the seawall at the intertidal zone. The new wall will be built of large stone, similar to the wall at the Fishers Island Utility Company property to the west, as agreed between you, me, and the other Trustees during our April 6h site visit earlier this year. The large stone will be set in a stable interlocking fashion using the old cut stone on the seabed as the foundation. The wall will come up to the same height as it previously existed which is best referenced to the seawall return on the west side of the property. A geotextile material will be placed between the stone work and the backfill to keep it retained within the structure. Once the finished grade is reached,the top layer fill materials will be top soil,which will then be landscaped to meet the Town's typical 10 foot non-turf buffer requirements. The wall thus restored will be similar in nature and identical in function to the wall that was destroyed in Hurricane Sandy and will comply with the agreed upon design standards from our site visit as well as the Town regulatory requirements for environmental quality improvement. This repair/reconstruction process and design has been reviewed with the NYS DEC Marine Habitat Protection Bureau and was considered acceptable. I trust that you will find this all acceptable to approve this as an amendment to the previous permit where seawall repair was approved. Please let me know if the need for any firrther information arises. Your assistance,as always,is appreciated. Yours Truly, Docko Incorporated &B.Neilson,P.E. KBN:tw CC:Brian DeBroff Dick Grebe FILE: 12-02-2365 DEBROFF js& a �ogOlFot,��, James F. King.President Totvn I lall_53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio.Jr. . Vice-President �y .�' P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold_NY 11971 John BredemeNerty 7/0 ��` I elephone(63 1)765-1892 Michael J. Domino A_ 7��[ Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of BRIAN DEBROFF COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING TO RE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR EIGHT DAYS I, V--u4-6 3, /)-,N residing at /dba l4' 174�it"t 1��fic , C� O<o325'' being duly sworn. depose and say: That on the day of JUL-r 2013, I personally posted the property known as 3l Zt' Cr i U noL- ')1 Ou( qc) by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, Ad that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, July 17,2013. Dated: (signature) worn to before me this of day ofJu1120 13 C tar y Public - x �' ♦'�fY. ` . bJ AJ.. iffy 1. x ry r/�.{ ! ' r � '� .".,� L�� key.r'•' `� �„ "��y1 � yj�� r '�, i � .•: 'Y h 1�.. -�►.:� ,p' \ \-,• �r(T✓'x_�.'� � �� y),�K�� > '• � u� �I Utz�'}J,j�' { �1 `'�S• :T �.f r NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD:16";".be''$ ro P SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: To remove the existing +/-58 linear foot mortared stone seawall and replace it in-place using larger stone; and install a 10' wide non-turf buffer landward of the seawall. TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: &Jed , T,!y 17, ao)3 -a}-or obotx+ .5�-* 30 W) If you have an interest in this project, you are Invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection rior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours ofp8 a.m and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631 ) 765- 1892 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: FI UTILITY COMPANY P.O. BOX E, FISHERS ISLAND,NY 06390 ELSA RIVER 9 HEATHER LANE, ELMSFORD,NY 10523 CAPE SEVILLITY, LLC P.O. BOX 70, HADLYME, CT 06439 BARRY& MARYLIN RESEBERG 17 WEST 67TH STREET,NEW YORK,NY 10023 STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW LONDON _DOCKO, INC. , residing at 14 HQLMES STRE T MYSTIC CT 06355, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ay of 20 deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the fioard of Trustees 74plication, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at MYSTIC, CT, that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this Day of%rte , 20 t _ Notary Public NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER I , . I Mad Only;No insurance Coverage, For dellverY information visit Our welasite at viviniv.dit, *_ r-j Postage $ , —1 V fU Postage $ y Ll( - 4jo S E` Cedifiad FeeI O d) ru Certified Fee 7 1 Postmark -7� t7 7 Return Recelpt Fee Flare Return Racelpt Fee 4 ) (Endorsement Required) (� E3 (Endorsement Requlred) a. 5� \'� Has 7 Restricted Delivery Fed \` Restricted Delivery Fed )j ] (Endorsement Required) 17 (Endorsement Required) f 7 I!' R Total Postage 8 Fees �( �' \/ J rl t, 1 Total Postage&Fees Sent To 0 sent o G r-3 C.vsCI. �.......------....................... .. 7 Sheet,AV.No.; y V .y^...'..... orPOBaxNo. �j ,Q �UP Eti ar P06ax No. y --.y,-`y-1n, /''�y�Q ..... . ...........J.........................�---------._......_..._.q........._..... ..................... ..... ..molal:..` '......lw. City,:slate,21PaG C u 1 City,State,Z a f ^ o f IE - - 41(Abridestild Mail Only,No insurance 7CERTIFIEEI r-RECEIPT `(Domestic only; • . �. ru ' Postage $ i LX .. _ N Postage $ F —111 U Certified Fee I(� %.� t )J \ fL Certified Fee • �D , 1 ] d / Postmark\ + C3 `Poslma f) ] Return Receipt Fee 7� ri Flare , Return Receipt Fee f�, -» Here ] (Endorsement Required) 0C i I O (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee t. i Restricted Delivery Fee r ] (Endorsement Requlred) O (Endorsees nt Required) Er ] � I O Total Postage d Fees `,S ri rctal Postage&Fees fTl ] our j O a Mc�c�1��1.�1�eS � v�S i O Sieet.ApiN,n�`),\_)� CUvh _Lc ] Siiaef,A1' - ----- -/- -- �fi.yt G i r, ar PO Hax No. )�C !L1la �. .W..1.__..._._V _CSR: . ............'_`C._�..__..`.! .._.._..__..----- City,State,ZIP.4 1 Ctty,Sfatd,ZIPs4 N\' Town of Southold • • LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non-supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustee egg V-n D Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office. �! Y B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION JUL - 2 2013 D to-9-Iq SCTM# 1000—4W==4--2-7,4 Southold Town PROJECT NAME: Seawall Reconstruction (Brian DeBroff) Board fTrustees The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Board Building Dept. Board of Trustees X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Nature and extent of action: The proposed project is to reconstruct 57(+/-)LF of mortared stone seawall, all at and along the apparent high water line. 1 Location of action: 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island, NY 06390 Site acreage: .10(+/-) Present Land use: Residential Present Zoning Classification: Residential 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: a) Name of applicant: Brian DeBroff b) Mailing Address: 2220 Huntington Tyke., Trumbull, CT 06611 c) Telephone number: Area Code (203) 913-1605 d) Application number, if any SCTM 10-9-14 Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X No_ If yes, which state or federal Agency? US ALOE, NYS DEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No _Not Applicable The proposed seawall reconstruction makes appropriate beneficial use of an existing waterfront site and complies with environmental design factors published by the NYS DEC, and the DOS Coastal Management Program, Southold Local Law No. 6, 2004 and the Southold LWRP The yroiect has been reviewed with the NYS DEC Marine Habitat Protection Bureau and a site visit on April 6 2013 reviewed the site conditions with the Trustees. It was agreed the Project preserves the nature of the shoreline in Pirates Cove and will minimize adverse effects of development on the character of the Cove and on environmental resources. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable 2 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria X Yes _No Not Applicable The proposed repairs and modification will maintain aesthetics by reconstructing a damaged, destroyed stone wall and restore non-turf landscaping in a LOFT wide strip behind the wall which will keep this facility consistent with aesthetics of adjacent properties, in particular the Fishers Island Utility Company seawall next door to the west which is built of large similar to that proposed in this project. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. X Yes _ No Not Applicable The rebuilt seawall / retaining wall is essential to protect the site from erosion from storm induced waves and flooding. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This project will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island, being a shoreline structure located in Marine waters (salt water) there is no fresh water source, surface or subsurface, in the stone wall reconstruction area. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This reconstructed seawall will not impede or divert water flow and circulation or alter lop shore hore sediment transport or erosion or deposition of sediments. The construction materials for this project are consistent with NYS DEC and Town of Southold regulations. The seawall repairs will be using stone and mortar, both basically inert materials. The existing rubble will be removed and disposed of off site in accordance with statutory and ordinance requirements or it will be worked in to the backfill after the seawall has been rebuilt. 3 Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this project. No emissions will be generated. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable Anticipating that the rubble debris from the existing structure is incorporated into the new seawall backfill, there will be no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this project. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable The existing stone wall created a nearly vertical face through the intertidal zone, the new wall will as well. The new wall will be built on the existing stone which has existed on the seabed for decades, exposed at low tide. The public trust lands and waters constitutes the area between the mean high water line and mean low water line and the resources are from the high tide line, out. These environmental resources are being protected by the design standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the reconstruction of the pier and landward seawall repairs at and above the apparent high water line are not likely to influence or change this fact. Access which exists at this time will be restored by the completion of this project. WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes _ No Not Applicable Modifications proposed are supporting a long standing residential seawall which preexisted current state and local policies and is consistent with USACOE policies at the time this site was developed. It is unlikely that zoning would be changed to promote other uses of the land without significant opposition. 4 Nonetheless if a hi erriorit r de endent use was to be located at site it is likel that such a use would benefit from the stabil shorefront and so this seawall recon ction is consistent with the policy for both land use options. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This project really changes little in terms of sustainable resources in Pirates Cove, West Harbor, Fishers Island Sound and Long Island Sound because the scope of work is a reconstruction project of a longstanding seawall. Water quality will be protected and erosion/ sedimentation will be minimized. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any agricultural or aquaculture industries or enterprises. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any energy or mineral mining or processing operations. PREPARED BY: _Keith B. Neilson, P.E.- Docko, Incorporated TITLE: Agent DATE: June 2013 5 ? Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits7docko.com June I 1� U D Mr.James King, President JUN z 4 2013 Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re; Permit Modification Brian DeBroff,Fishers Island Shorefront Protection Modifications West Harbor, Fishers Island Dear Mr. King: We are transmitting herewith one original and two copies of the signed and sealed revised drawings for the seawall restoration permit for Mr. Brian DeBroff in West Harbor on Fishers Island, Town of Southold Permit No. 7890 and 7890C. We have made modifications to various notes on the application drawings, which includes the quantity of stone for the seawall and foundation. This work appears to be covered by the US Army Corps Nationwide Permit No. 3. Likewise it is consistent with NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands regulatory for"adjacent areas", with no tidal wetlands or submerged aquatic vegetation resources on the site. Preliminary indications are that the NYS DEC will process as a minor modification and we have, accordingly, submitted the permit modifications documents. I have enclosed a check for $100.00 for the Coastal Erosion and Tidal Wetlands permit modifications. I trust that you will find the permit modification request complete and acceptable.Please feel free to call me if you seek further information Yours truly, lDOCKO, INC. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KNB: cb Enclosures CC: Mr. Brian DeBroff File: File:12-02-2365DEBROFF Town orSouthold LbVRP CONSISTENCY .ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants lbr permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *h.:rcej t Ji�r minor crernpt actions including Auilding Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion fla_urd Arra. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its sienificant beneficial_and_aLh er,se effects upon ,the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no". then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non-supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's w•ehsite (southoldtown.northtork.net), the Board of Trust c Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Otfice. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION PI ZJUN2013 SCCM# 1000- 09-9-27.4 PROJECTNAME: Seawall Reconstruction (BrianDeBroff) n I Burd of Trustees The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board _ Planting Board Building Dept. Board of Trustees K I. C'atcgory of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency (e.g. capital construction. planning activity agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Nature and extent of action: fhc-piuposed project is to reconstruct 5 i j=I1 P of mortared stone se try-all. till t and along tltc Tparent hi'lh water line. I Location of action: =2 i 1 6Itto)amina Lxtension, t_ shcrs tsland, NY 06390 Site act cage: Present Land use: Residential Present Zoning Classification: Residential 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall he provided: a) Name of applicant: Brian DeBroff b) Mailing Address: 2220 Huntin�t�pke.. Trumbull, Cf 0661 I c) Telephone number: Arca Codc (203) 913-1605 d) Application number, if any _SCTM 10-()-14 Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or tederal agency? Yes X No_ If vcs, which state or federal Agency? L,'S ACOE, NYS DEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the 'Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No _Not Applicable fhc proposed seawall reconstruction makes appropriate beneficial use of an esistinu waterfront site and complies with cmaronmental design factors published by the NYS DEC, and the DOS Coastal Manai_,ement Program, Southold Local Law- No. 6, 2004 and the Southold LWRP. Tho Meet has been reviewed with the NYS DEC Marine Habitat Protection Bureau and a site visit on April 6, 2013 _reviewed the site conditions with the Trustees. It was agreed the prosect preserves the nature of the shoreline in Pirates Cove and will minimize adverse effects of development on the character of the Cowe and on environmental resources. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LXVRP Section III — Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable 0 0 Policy 3, Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IIT— Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria X Yes — No _ Not Applicable 'The proposed repairs and modification will maintain aesthetics by reconstructing a danlaeed destroyed stone wall and restore non-turf landscaping in a tOFT wide strip behind the wall which will keep Chis facility consistent with aesthetics of adjacent properties, in particular the Fishers Island Utility Corm seawall next door to the west which is built of large similar to that proposed in this project NATURAL. COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section 111— Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable The rebuilt seawall " retaining wall is essential to protect the site Irom erosion from, storm induced w_a\_es and flooding. Policy S. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH — Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. Yes _No x Not Applicable This project witl not have anv affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island, being a shoretinc structure located in Marine waters (salt water) there is no fresh water source. surlacc or subsurface, in the stone wall reconstruction area. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This reconstructed seawall will -not impede or divert water Clow and circulation or alter loin Shore rt sediment transpoor erosion or deposition of sediments. 7 he construction materials for this project are consistent with NYS DEC and Town of Southold regulations. The seawall repairs will be using stone and mortar, both basically inert materials The existing rubble will be removed and disposed of off site in accordance with statutory and ordinance rcu uircments or it will be worked in to the backfill atter the seawall has been rebuilt. 3 Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality, in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -- Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes No x Not Applicable There are no air uuality issues related to this project. :moo emissions will be generated. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable Anticatinthat the rubble debris from the_existintt structure is incorporated into the new seawall backfill there will be no solid waste or hazardous substances to be venerated from thisrp oiect. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable The existin, stone wall created a nearly vertical face through the intertidal zone the new wall will as well. The new wall will be built on the existing stone which has existed on the seabed for decades, c�2sed at low tide. The public trust lands and waters constitutes the area between the mean high water line and mean low water line and the resources are Brom the high tide line, out. These environmental resources are bcingprotected by the design standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the reconstruetion of the grey and landward seawall repairs at and above the apparent high seater line are not likely to influence or change this fact. Access which exists at this time will_be restored by the completion of th sproiect. WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section 111 — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable Moditiattcins proposed_are suppgrtim cti t Iona stan<line revdcntal seawall which nreexi,tcd current state and local volicies and is consisteni 4cith USAMI: mol ctcs at_the time this Site. w_as de�clopcd. It is unlikely that zoninL4 would be chanced to plonnote other uses of the land without sienificant opposition. 4 Vonetheless if a hi"lru p iority_0r dependent ux was to he hoa+ted at trite it ra lihcl}_that such a u,c would benefit trom the stahilvcd shorefront and so this sE nyall reconstruction v� consistutt with the f-oltcv for both land use options. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section Irl — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. x Yes No Not Applicable I his r sect really changes little in terms of sustainable resources in Pirates Cove West Harbor Fishers Island Sound and Long Island Sound because the scope of work is a reconstruction project of a longstanding seawall. Water quality will be protected and erosion. sedimentation will be mi_nimired, Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. _ Yes No X Not Applicable ['his pier is not used for or in support of any agrjcultural or aquaculture industries or enterprises. Police 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP Section 111— Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Y Not Applicable I hispier is not used for or in su ort.of any energy or mineral inining or t rocc5sim ��geranons, PREPARED BY: Keith B. Neilson,_P.L.- Docko,_Incorxxated CI'CLE: Agent — DATE: June 2013 James F. King, President Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael $. Domino Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line Ist day of construction ~ constructed Project complete, compliance inspection BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 7890 & 7890C DATE: AUGUST 22~ 2012 ISSUED TO: BRIAN DEBROFF PROPERTY ADDRESS: 271 GLOAMING EXTENSION~ FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 10-9-14 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on August 22 2012, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of $500.00 paid by Docko, Inc. and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to lower the deck of an existing 6' wide by 42' long pile supported pier; install a 6' x 20' float with associated 3.5' x 20' hinged ramp; four (4) new 8" diameter restraint piles; two (2) new 8" diameter tie-off piles; repair +/-57" of mortared stone seawall, all at and waterward of apparent high water; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc. last dated September 17, 2012, and stamped approved on October 2, 2012. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee Brian DeBroff, residing at 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island, New York as part of the consideration for the issuance of thc Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Pennittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation, the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of tho completion of the work authorized. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F. King, President Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael J. Domino Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT COASTAL EROSION PERMIT #7890C Applicant/Agent: Docko, Inc. Permittee: Brian DeBroff SCTM#: 10-914 Project Location: 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island Date of Resolution/Issuance: August 22, 2012 Date of Expiration: August 22, 2014 Reviewed by: Board of Trustees DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: To repair +/-57' of mortared stone seawall, all at and waterward of apparent high water; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc. last dated September 17, 2012, and stamped approved on October 2, 2012. INSPECTIONS: Final Inspection SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (apply if marked) In accordance with Chapter 111-15 Erosion Protection Structures: XX A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. James F. King, President Board of Trustees James F. King, President Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael J. Domino Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 30-YEAR MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EROSION PROTECTION STRUCTURES CHAPTER 111-15 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE The owners of record of property at: 271 Gloaminq Extension, Fishers Island, New York SCTM#: 1000-10-9-14 in applying for a Coastal Erosion Permit for an erosion protection structure do hereby agree to a 30-Year Maintenance program for a structure as described: to repair +/-57' of mortared stone seawall, all at and waterward of apparent hiqh water, as shown on the attached licensed survey and/or site plan for the approved structure. It is my/our understanding that we are to maintain this structure with materials designed to endure 30 years and/or equivalent to the original approved structure. Any maintenance which involves more than 50% of the length of this structure requires approval of the Board of Trustees. We further understand that failure to maintain the structure could result in a requirement to post a bond and/or have the repairs ordered as a lien against the property upon a finding by the Board of Trustees that said lack of maintenance would risk life, property or important natural resource features. Notary Public Notarized signature of owner of record LYNN GRANATA Notary Public My Commission E×Dires ,hJly 31, This maintenance agreement shall only be valid upon the attachment of a licensed land survey/and or site plan made within one year of the original construction and validated to show the final approval of the administrator. James F. King, President Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael J. Domino Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Augu~ 22,2012 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Keith Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. PO Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: BRIAN DEBROFF 271 GLOAMING EXTENSION, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 10-9-14 Dear Mr. Neilson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, August 22, 2012 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Docko, Inc. on behalf of BRIAN DEBROFF applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, application dated July 5, 2012, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policy 9.3 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: to install a 6' x 20' float; and to install four (4) new 8" diameter restraint piles and two (2) new 8" diameter tie-off piles, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 22, 2012, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of BRIAN DEBROFF to lower the deck of an existing 6' wide by 42' long pile supported pier; install a 6' x 20' float with associated 3.5' x 20' hinged ramp; four (4) new 8" diameter restraint piles; two (2) new 8" diameter tie-off piles; repair +/-57' of mortared stone seawall, all at and waterward of apparent high water; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc. last dated September 17, 2012, and stamped approved on October 2, 2012. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $ 50.00 Very truly yours, ja es~F. King(~ '~ President, Board of Trustees JFWamn James F. King, Pre.qident Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael J. Domino Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (63 I) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: BRIAN DEBROFF CIO DOCKO, INC. Please be advised that your application dated July 5, 2012 has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of August 22, 2012 and your application has been approved pending the completion of the following items checked off below. Revised Plans for proposed project XX Property Owner to Sign and Notarize the enclosed 30-Year Maintenance Agreement Form and return original to the Board of Trustees Office Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) __ 1st Day of Construction ($50.00) - ~ Constructed ($50.00) __ Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) __ Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above, COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: $ BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees James F. King, President Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael J. Domino Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Please be advised that your application dated ,'0'~ Iv ~', 2-~! Z- has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of firl,~.~, i,~ ~L 7_~, 2~->12~ and your application has been approved pending the core,etlon of the following items checked off below. x// Revised Plans for proposed project ~'~: 2/>~bo-JF 0oqa~ (.~) <~// lcl'&-Orr __ Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) p~'jeS __ Ist Day of Construction ($50.00) __ ½ Constructed ($50.00) Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) __ Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees Au9 22 2012 11:35 HP Fax~ UtJ~Jty 788 7798 page 2 FISHERS ISLAND UTILITY OOMPAN',4 IN(]. FISHERS ISI_~,JD New YORK ROBERT E. WALL PRESIDENT AI:::F-A CODE B~l'l/TBB-7PS't FAX 83'1/7BB-7?@B Dock~ Inc A~n:Mr. Ke~h Neilson. P.E. P.O. Box421 Mys~CT 06355 AUG 2 2 2072 Soathho!d Town Beard of Trustees Dear Mr. Neilson, Fishers Island Utility Company has received your modified plans for a dock for Mr. Brian DeBroff and the concerns we had are no longer valid. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely yours, ~ .~ ~ Robert E. Wall Au9 22 2012 11:35 HP Fax~ U~Uty 788 7798 page 1 Fishers hhn~ U44IRT Company P.O. Drawer E Fishers gsland, NY 06390 631 788 7251 Date a/22/2012 TO: Town Trustees F~ 631 765'~-7 From: ~ou Wall FAX # 631 788 7798 "/F ----- -----.~!] ! Subject De, toff dock hearing Number ofpat~es including this one 2 FISHERS~SLAND UTILITY COMP--ANY, FISHERS ISLAND NEW YORK 06390 INC. ROBERT E. WALL PRESIDENT 81~3/20~2 Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex Building 5~375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. :1:1971 AREA CODE 631/788-7251 FAX631/788-7798 AUG ] 6 2012 Dear Board of Trustees, As a neighboring property owner of Mr. Brian DeBroff, the Fishers Island Utility Company wishes to object to t,he ;)roposed modifications and extension of the neighboring pier. While the lowering of the elevation of the existing dock poses no problem, the extension of the facility approximately 45' further towards the very narrow entrance to the heavily used inner two coves of West Harbor will pose navigational diffcuities for muitipie users. The daily usage by the varying businesses can be described as constant with crossing traffic, some with boats in tow, occurring at all hours of the day. The proposed extension will cause a hardship on all of those users as well as use of a sailboat which has limited turning ability when entering and exiting its dock. Further, there is an active dock 2 docks to the south which requires maneuvering room. If the proposed extension were reduced to the same footprint of the dock on Fishers island Utility property (ie: no further intrusion into the navigable channel), the potential reduction of navigable waters will not exist. As such, the Fishers Island Utility Co objects to the proposed plan as submitted. Robert E. Wall CC: Docko Inc Oocko Inc. Se.ing the waterfront community since 1987 RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: permits@docko.com Mr. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 AUG - 8 2012 Seuthlt01d I0we Board of Trustees August 6, 2012 Re: Founding Father's Day Dear Mr. King: The buoys have been set at the Moody property in Silver Eel Cove and the DeBroff property located in Pirates Cove on Fishers Island. I hope you have a chance to review each of the sites. I will not be able to attend the meeting but please feel free to call me if you have any questions about either project. Yours traly, DOCKO, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb File 12-02-2365 DEBROFF File 11-09-2329 MOODY Peter Young, Chairman Lauren Standish, Secretary Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P,O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (63 I) 765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., August 15, 2012 the following recommendation was made: Moved by Audrey Horton, seconded by Doug Hardy, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the Wetland Permit application of BRIAN DeBROFF to lower the deck of an existing 6'X 42' pile supported pier, install an 8'X 20' floating dock with associated ramp, restraint piles and five (5) tie-off piles; and repair 57' of mortared stone wall. Located: 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island. SCTM#10-9-14 Inspected by: John Stein, Doug Hardy, Audrey Horton Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried James F. King, President Bob Ghosio. Jr.. Vice-President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael J. Domino PO. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone(631 765 1892 Fax (631 ) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: ~//~//~ fi ,~; 3 0 BRIAN DeBROFF requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to lower the deck of an existing 6'X 42' pile supported pier, install an 8'X 20' floating dock with associated ramp, restraint piles and five (5) tie-off piles; and repair 57' of mortared stone wall. Located: 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island. SCTM#10-9-14 Type of area to be impacted: __Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound __Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland z~ Part of Town Code,proposed work falls under: 'J'Chapt.275 ~hapt. 111 other Type of Application: __ Wetland __Coastal Erosion _..Amendment __Administrative__Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: ,..~/~ CT/¢/J /¢~{p ,~ ( ¢ 2'~ Conditions: Present Were: ~"J. King B. Ghosio__ L,-J. Bredemeyer___ Michael Domino / ~D. Bergen, D. Dzenkowski Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: other earth feet meters 100 4OO BRIAN DEBROFF 271 GLOAMING EXTENSI[ON FISilIERS ISLAND, NEW YORK February' Is 2012 PHOTOGRAPH I This photograph was taken from the float of the Fisher's Island Uti liE~' Company property, west of the sile. Mr. DeBrol~Fs home is in the right edge of the photograph and the pier emanates From the lawn toward the cen~er of the photograph, pr,4jecting out lo the lett (north). The fit)at will be at file left edge of the photograph approximately. PHOTOGRAPH 2 Fhis photograph was token from the floa of the Fishers lslm~d { Jtitity property, looking in the southerly direction, shows the existing mortared stone seawall with stone toe protection, as well as the point of origin for the fixed pier. The reason k~r the elevation of the fixed pier is unknown, but makes N>ating access extremely difficult, especially fbr low tide operations. PHOTOGRAPH 3 This photograpb is a close up view of the pier and decking system, which begins at an elevation of approximately 6 NGVD and goes up 2 feet or so to the main deck, this puts the deck height at 9 feel above mean Iow water and makes the structure precarious to use fbr iow water operations and tbr access to most boats. The elevation is not in keeping with the aesthetics of the small cove. One of the primary points of emphasis o£the project is to lower the deck. The skewed angle between the center-bent of piles is almost certainly attributable to the location of boulders in the sub-straight. BRIAN DEBROFF NEW RAMP & FLOAT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, FISHERS ISLAND NARRATIVE STATEMENT February I, 2012 GENERAL Mr. Brian DeBroff owns parcel 10.9.14 on the Gloaming Extension, on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel earthen materials, vegetated with grass, brush and ground cover. The frontage of the property is approximately 65(+/-) feet along Pirates Cove in West Harbor at the southerly end, abutted by F.I. Utility Company, Inc. and Ms. Elsa River. The waterfront consists of a rock covered shallow subtidal zone. It is the DeBroff's desire to repair and lower the deck elevation of their timber and pile supported pier and install a new hinged ramp to a floating dock system for ease of boat access at low tide. The dock end of this new pier will match existing pier end elevation crossing over the seawall at a typical height of 6 feet above mean low water and the bottom sediments. The float will be 8 feet wide for stability and be aligned straight out along the centerline of the pier. The existing pier is more than 40 years old and elements and conditions will be repaired and replaced as necessary as a part of this project. The seawall will be repaired as necessary. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and sborefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. DESCRIPTION OF WORK This project is to repair the existing wood timber pier with lowered decking and install an 8 foot wide by 20 foot long float accessed by an hinged ramp and repair an existing stone seawall / retaining wall in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-motmted crane and push boats. The existing pier will be removed after marker piles and driven for reference New piles will be driven at the intervals shown in the drawings. Some of the piles on the existing pier will have to be replaced because of the modifications to the deck support structure and framing. These piles will be driven by double-acting air hammer to a bearing resistance of approximately 20 tons. This generally results in about 10 to 15 foot embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. These piles will be 6-inch nominal tip diameter with 10-inch diameter measured three feet from the butt. After the piles are~l~stalled, split caps (also referred to as consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southem Pine timbers ranging from 3 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, three or four runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to take care of any uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southem Pine but rather oak fir, cedar hardwood or plastic / composite such as Timber Tech or similar synthetic material with the brushed side mounted up. If Timber Tech, it will be either gray, brown or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless steel flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a lA" gap between deck planks. The new pier support piles will be about 42 inches above the deck surface and have horizontal rail members mounted to them, either wood or cable or a combination. A sturdy top rail of cedar, oak or hardwood will be installed for safety except possibly in areas where boat access to the pier is necessary. The new hinged ramp will be installed at the end of the pier so as to land approximately 3 feet on the float with a maximum slope of 3:l at low tide. This can be a wood rump, made of pressure-treated fruming and posts with non-CCA wood or plastic decking. If necessary, the ramp could be built of aluminum but that is not the material preference. Float restraint and tie- off piles will be stand-alone piles, un-braced, with a nominal 6-inch tip and 10-inch butt diameter driven by the same equipment as the pier support piles. Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle charger and / or bilge pump on the boat(s) may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage.. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, a power post with a low wattage internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. This light system may be manually or radio controlled with a shut-offtimer so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the dock repair and modifications are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The site is in southeasterly West Harbor on Fishers Island and is characterized as Developed Coast. The developed coast policies are applicable as follows: Policy I is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The proposed dock modifications are consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The pier is made of timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law #6 and consistent with other adjacent dock facilities and e, haracteristics for the visual and scenic considerations in the cove. The encroachment has been minimized to be consistent with DEC policies of reaching navigable water to preclude dredging. The new deck and support framing will create a profile consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal range of this site. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety, and lights will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse impact. The seawall repairs will not be visible from a distance; existing area aesthetics will not be affected by this repair work. NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: Policy 4 - Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, Policy 5 - Protect and improve water quality Policy 6 - Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, Policy 7 - Protect and improve air quality, Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The seawall / retaining wall protects the DeBroff's home and property. Ongoing repairs and continued maintenance are essential to be consistent with these policies. The proposed recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to be consistent with the Town of Southold and DEC permit requirements for such structures and previously agreed upon DEC stipulations for the wetlands crossing. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. There will be no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the extension of the dock to 3-4 feet of water should minimize sediment agitation and resuspension so the water quality in West Harbor should be improved. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project enhances an existing recreational boating facility for the property while minimizing long term adverse environmental impacts and so is consistent with this policy. WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: Policy 10 - Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, Policy 11 - Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, Policy 12 - Protect agricultural lands, Policy 13 - Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the citing of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable and the proposed project has been laid out to make the most beneficial use of the land and locating the dock facility in the most appropriate point of the land where access over the intertidal zone and shallow subtidal zone already exists. This is also the point on the property where the deepest water is accessed with the least encroachment and least impact on adjacent dock usage. SUMMARY In summary, the proposed dock extension is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The structure has been reconfigured in size so as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and with the necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site. This project does not create any new interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion problems, in fact it will help to prevent such problems, it does not adversely affect environmental resources significantly. The dock extension reaches out toward the deepest water in the entrance to Pirates Cove at the southeast end of West Harbor near this site so that dredging will not be an issue in the future and thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts such as bottom sediment resuspension. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and long term water quality should improve as a result of this project. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. In accordance with Local Law//6, decking for the float, the pier and the ramp treads will be of woods other than Southern Yellow Pine. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the proposed docking facility. In summary, with regard to Town programmatic guidelines for approval, this project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock extension will be an accessory to the DeBrofffs existing home. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. The work on the seawall is retention and repair of an existing long standing facility for continued structural integrity and to prevent soil erosion. This project is considered to be providing recreational opportunity compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site and adjacent properties. The most significant waves come in to West Harbor fi.om the north at high tides prevailing waves will be fi.om the north. The floating dock is the appropriately sized for stability considerations especially acknowledging that the float is perpendicular to the most significant fetch. This alignment is required on order to avoid boating traffic patterns on both sides. The float is suitably sized and adequately stable for a ramp landing and the ramp has been made no longer than necessary to provide a safe 3:1 slope at low tides. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6~ 2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property from such operations. By such a"/~eptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. The new piles to be installed will be of the diameter shown in the drawings, sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood. CCA pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) piles with new split caps and braces of the same SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's with at least one 1" diameter bolt per connection, and in many cases, two ~" bolts per connection. This pier is a long-standing (built in 1970's) fixed, pile-supported timber structure with a proposed float and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or affect the fluctuating water levels in the Harbor. In addition, the pier extension does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials are specifically grown for this purpose and are capable of withstanding full immersion and represent the standard of the industry. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and typical West Harbor waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of 10 to 20 years. The pier support will include driving new piles as required to match existing intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to maintain pier alignment and the new deck height. Stand-alone float restraint and tie-off piles will be 1 O-inch diameter. The use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers can be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. New decking for the pier and float will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier extension provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails may be installed on the pier for safety. The long-standing pier is almost centered on the property. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph should not be an issue because the proposed extension does not represent a significant encroachment into the adjacent boating operation, nor does it project into the navigation way for other boaters in the cove or the logical line of littoral development rights which would be based on the centerline of the cove~l~e float width of 8 feet is considered~l~cessary and appropriate for boating safety because of the broadside exposure to waves from the north and inherent float stability. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking nor are any planned at this time other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function and certainly not an adverse visual impact. It is currently possible to provide a five-foot passage way beneath this pier and that access ability will be retained. There is room to walk under the pier at low tide; however, foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all, due to boulders in the intertidal zone. NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands Regulations - Sections 661.5 and 661.9 This project represents the minor modifications of a long-standing dock facility at the far southeast end of West Harbor. The dock facilities include a pier and pier landing over the intertidal zone as well as a floating dock accessed by ramps from the pier. The float restraint piles hold the float in place as shown in the application drawings. There is no wetland vegetation in the vicinity of the dock site: the site is an "adjacent area". Piers for recreational boating at residential properties on the waterfront are considered to be generally compatible use in an adjacent area (AA) with a permit being required under Section 661.5 (b) (1), 15 and 24. Under Section 661.9, the standards for issuance of permits of NYS DEC regulations, the following are considered to be pertinent considerations. The policies are created to preserve and protect tidal wetlands and prevent their despoilation and destruction. Regulated activities will not have an undo adverse impact on the present or potential value of the affected tidal wetlands. Tidal wetlands vegetation does not exist in the vicinity of the dock site on the interface between the existing stone seawall and the exposed rock-covered, sandy bottom sediments in the intertidal zone. NYS DEC guidelines have been worked into the pier configuration and details shown in the application drawings. This pier and floating dock facility reconstruction project is compatible with public health and welfare policies of the State. The project complies with development restrictions contained in Section 661.6. Furthermore, the project is a waterfront dock facility structure and is compatible with the use of the site, zoning and the long-standing use along the waterfront. This project will not have an undo or adverse impact on the present or potential value of nearby tidal wetlands vegetation. These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 -Water Dependent uses - This project is to modify and improve a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating and to maintain an existing stone seawall. The modifications and improvements will improve water quality by reducing bottom damage and sediment re-suspension and make habitat improvements for vegetation. Policy 5 - Use of Existing Developed Shorefront - There is developed shoreline on this site. The project will be to rebuild, an existing pier and put in a floating dock to make it safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions and all tidal conditions. Policy 7 - Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat - Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The dock to the shoreward point of beginning will span over the shoreline four feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not affect the quality or the integrity of existing resources on either side of the pier. Typically there is a slight environmental benefit associated with pier projects because of the creation of structure in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize. Policy 8 - Protection & Preservation of Habitat - Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its minimal configuration and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The modifications and improvements will improve water quality and habitat improvements. Policy 11 - Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock modification project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above because this a waterward pier extension and the inclusion of the float in 3 to 4 feet of water should reduce sediment re-suspension. Policy 14 - No Measurable Increase in Flooding - This project consists of seawall repairs and modifications of an open wood pile docking facility and timber pier which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence on those levels. In fact, this project purpose is to modify the dock location and configuration to preclude dredging. Policy 15 - No Dredging - Dredging is not required in this project. The floating dock system has been laid out to reach 4 feet of water depth at mean low water conditions and to avoid any dredging requirements as generally recommended by the NYS DEC. The waters are protected enough that boats can be berthed bow to the shore leaving the motor out in the deeper water. The float and the boat drive system will not ground out at low tide. Policy 19 - Impact on Public Access - Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is relatively little desirable public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this busy site. The intertidal zone is spotted with boulders and tidal wetlands does not exist at the site. The shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. The pier and float occupy less than the landward 25% of the waterway width 7 in accordance with US and Town of Southold policies, on all of these considerations public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. _P. olicy 20 - Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Most of the nearby properties have small docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights. Policy 21 - Water Dependent Recreation - This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Policy 24 -Scenic Resources, Impairment or Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The reconstruction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will not represent a significant new encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources. The elevated inboard section of the pier will be reduced by this project to be consistent with other adjacent dock facilities the float will make this pier of a similar length to other adjacent facilities and the seawall repairs will not be visible more than a couple of hundred feet. Policy 25 - Enhance Overall Scenic Quality - The new dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and will not result in loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 - Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands - It is acknowledged that the fringe marsh of spartina altemiflora along the shorefront on nearby properties, though fragmented, is a valuable resource. The reconstruction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier and replacement of wood decking has taken advantage of the existing structure footprint and will to avoid adverse wetlands impact. The height of the pier should not impede or restrict opportunities for the growth of the spartina fringe vegetation naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the existing pier if there is any natural tendency for that to ever occur. It appears that current conditions are in equilibrium and no such growth is expected. SUMMARY This project proposes repair of a long standing seawall and fixed pier modifications to lower the deck and new float for recreational boating access of property of the DeBroff family on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and its approval is respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. New York State JOZNT APPLTCAT~ON FORM For Permits/Determinatioos to under~ake activities affecting streams, waterways, waterbodies, weUands, coastal areas and ~ources of water supply. You must separately apply for and obtain separate Permits/Determinatlona from each involved agency prior to proceeding with work. Please read all instructions. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) APpLICATiONS TO 1. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Chock ali permits that apply: [] Stream Disturbance [] Excavation and Fill in Navigable Waters [] Docks, Moorings or Platforms [] Dams and Impoundment [] 401 Water Quality [] Freshwater Wetlands [] Tidal Wetlands [] Coastal Erosion Management [] Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers [] Water Supply [] Long Island Well [] Aquatic Vegetation Control [] Aquatic Insect Control [] Fish Control [] Incidental Take of Endan- gered/lhreatened Species [] ! am sending this application to this agency. 2. US Army Corps of Engineers Chock all permits that apply: [] Section 404 Clean Water Act [] Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act [] Nationwide Permit(s) - Identify Number(s): 3 Precoostrustion Notification - ~--I y / r~N [] [ am sending this application to this agency. 5. Nama of Applicant (use full name) Applicant must be: Brian DeBroff [] Owner [] Operator Mailing Address 2220 Huntington Tpke [] Lessee (check all that apply) Post Off'~e City Tmmbull Taxpayer ID (If applicant is NOT an individual): State CT Zip Code06611 Telephone (daytime) Email (2O3) 913-1605 7. Contact/Agent Name KEITH B. NEILSON, P. E. Company Name DOCKO, INC. Mailing AddressP.O, BOX 421 Post Office City MYSTIC State Zip Code CT 06355 Telephone (daytime) (860) 572-8939 office~oc~o.com 3. NYS Office of General Services Chock all ~rrnits that apply: [] State Owned Lands Under Water [] Utility Easement (pipelines, ceb~s, etc.) Moorings or Platforms [ am sending this application to this a~eno/. 4. NYS Depart- ment of State Check ff this applies: [] Coastal Consistency Concurrence [] ! am sending this application to this a~ency. 6. Name of Facility or Property Owner (if different than Applicant) Mailing Address Post Office City State Zip Code Telephone (daytime) Email 8. Project / Facility Name I Property Tax Map Section / Block / Lot Number Property of Brian DeBroff I 1000-O10-9-14 ProJect Location - Provide directions and distances to roads, bridges and bodies of waters: Suffolk County, Fishem Island - VVest H a(oor Street Addmss~/,f. applicable ~:?~lersOf i~ea~Clty State Zip Code 271 Gloaming cx~ensmn NY 06390 Town / Village / City County F~ws Isiaod Suffolk Name of USGS Quadrangle Map Stream/Water Body Name NL~N LONDON, CT-RI~IY V~st Harbor LocaUon Coordinates: Enter NYIT4s in kilometers, OR Latitude/Longitude NYTM-E NYTM-N Latitude Longitude 41° 15' 37" N 72° 00' 30" W II ~ OEC App~JcaUon Number: 3OZNT APPLZCA'rZON FOR~ 09/10 USACE Number: Thle is a 2 Page Application Both Pages Must be Completed Application Form Page I of 2 II 1OZNT APPLICAT:[ON FORM - PAGE 2 OF 2 Submit th~s completed page as part of your Application. 9. Project Description and Purpose: Provide a complete narrative description of the proposed work and its purpose. AL~ach additional page(s) if necessary. [ndude: description of current site conditions and how Lbo site will be modified by the proposed project; structures and fill materials to be installed; type and quantity of materials to be used (Lo., ~uere ft of coverage and cubic yds of fill material and/or structures betow ordinary/mean high water) area of excavation or dredging, volumes of material to be removed and ~ocation of dredged material disposal or use; Proposed Proposed Use: [] Private [] Public rlcommercial I 2012 Start Has Work Begun on Project? [] Yes [] NO [f Yes, explain. Estimated J Completion Date: 2012 Will Project Occupy Federal, State or Municipal Land? [] Yes [] NO If Yes, please spedfy. I10. Ust Previous Permit / Application Numbers (if any) and Dates: 11. WIll this project require additional Federal, State, or Local Permits including zoning changes? US ACOE. Town of Southold. DOS [] Yes [] NO If yes, please list: 12. Signatures. If applicant is not the owner, both must sign the application. I hereby affirm that information provided on this form and all a~tachments submitted herewith Is true to the best ot my knowledge and belief. False statements mede herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Further, the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and descriptio~ resulting from said project. In addition, Federal Law, t8 U.S.C., Sec'don 100! provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up a materiel fact; or knowingly makes or uses a false, fictitious or fraudulent statement. Signature of Applicant Si,c~nature of A~lent Printed Name ~tle Date Prin,:ed ~l~mq ' Title Date Printed Name DateI ]OXNT APPL[CAT'[ON FORN 09/10 Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: permits@docko.com NYS DOS Deparhnent of Coastal Resources One Commerce Plaza 99 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12231 Jane 19, 2012 Re: Brian DeBroff, Fishers Island Dock Modifications & Seawall Repair West Harbor, Fishers Island To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of Mr. Brian DeBmff, we submit the attached Federal Consistency Assessment Form for dock modifications and seawall repair in West Harbor on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: Two prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: Applicant: Date: "Dock Modifications & Seawall Repair" West Harbor Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Brian DeBroff February 1, 2012 Two copies of Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold Application forms, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map and NYS DOS Coastal Management Federal Consistency Assessment Forms. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable: please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN: tw Enclosures CC: Brian DeBroff NYS DEC, US ACOE, TOS File: 12-02-2365 DEBROFF Docko, Inc, Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8@3~} Fax: (860) 572-7560, email: permits@docko.com June 19, 2012 Ms. Diane Ray U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacob Javits Federal Center, Room 1937 New York, New York 10278-0090 Dear Ms. Ray: Re: Brian DeBroff, Fishers Island Dock Modifications & Seawall Repair West Harbor, Fishers Island On behalf of Mr. Brian DeBroff, we request a Department of the Army Permit for dock modifications and seawall repair in West Harbor on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: Two prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: Applicant: Date: "Dock Modifications & Seawall Repair" West Harbor Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Brian DeBroff February 1, 2012 Two copies of Corps of Engineers and NYS DEC Application Forms, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map, photographs and NYS DOS Federal Consistency Assessment Form. One copy of the Town of Southold application, and the NYS DOS Consistency Review Form. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. KBN: tw Enclosures CC: Brian DeBroff NYS DEC,NYS DOS, TOS File: 12-02-2365 DEBROFF Very truly yours, DOCKO, 1NC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Docko, I nc. Serving, the waterfront community since 1987 P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 0C~355 (8150) 572-8039 Fax: (8t50) 572-7569, emaih permits@docko.com June 19, 2012 NYS DEC Environmental Permits Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Brian DeBroff, Fishers Island Dock Modifications & Seawall Repair West Harbor, Fishers Island To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of Mr. Brian DeBroff, we request a Tidal Wetlands Permit including Water Quality Certifications, as necessary, for dock modifications and seawall repair in West Harbor on Fishers Island, New York. We have enclosed the following in support of this permit application: Four prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: Applicant: Date: "Dock Modifications & Seawall Repair" West Harbor Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Brian DeBroff February 1, 2012 Four copies of the NYS DEC Joint Application, including the Short Environmental Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, Photographs Location Map and Site Survey One copy of each application submitted to other regulatory agencies I trust that you will fred this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, 1NC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN: tw Enclosures CC: Brian DeBroff US ACOE, NYS DOS, TOS File: 12-02-2365 DEBROFF EFH ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES (modified 08/04) PROJECT NAME: Dock Facility Reconstruction DATE: June 2012 PROJECT NO.: LOCATION: DeBroff Propert¥~ Fishers Island~ NY PREPARER: Docko~ Incorporated~ Keith B. Neilson~ P.E. Step t. Use the Habitat Conservation Division EFH webpage, Guide to Essential Fish Habitat Designations in the Northeastern United States to generate the list of designated EFH for federally-managed species for the geographic area of interest (http:llwww.nero.noaa.govlhcdlindex2a.htm). Use the species list as part of the initial screening process to determine if EFH for those species occurs in the vicinity of the proposed action. Attach that list to the worksheet because it will be used in later steps. Make a preliminary determination on the need to conduct an EFH Consultation. Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for eggs? X Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for larvae? X Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for juveniles? X Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for adults? X Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for spawning adults? X If you answered no to all questions above, then EFH consultation is not required -go to Section 5. If you answered yes to any of the above questions proceed to Section 2 and complete remainder of the worksheet. Step 2. In order to assess impacts, it is critical to know the habitat characteristics of the site before the activity is undertaken. Use existing information, to the extent possible, in answering these questions. Please note that, there may be circumstances in which new information must be collected to appropriately characterize the site and assess impacts. Is the site intertidal, sub-tidal, or This project is to rebuild a long-standing wood pile and timber dock water column? facility. The project will encompass parts of the shoreline, the intertidal zone and shallow subtidal zone approximately 0.t acres in size. See attached narrative. What are the sediment The existing intertidal and shallow subtidal sediments are fine grained characteristics? sand, and approximately 25% gravel with occasional exposed stone and boulders. There is a seawall and revetment along the shoreline and the sediments beneath the shore landing are stone and boulders. Is Habitat Area of Particular This site is an existing developed shorefront and not HAPC. The Concern (HAPC) designated at bluff that surrounds the cove is eroding due to exposure to normal or near the site? If so what tidal and climatic conditions, despite the moderate to heavy type, size, characteristics? vegetative growth. Is there submerged aquatic There is no visible SAV in the shallow subtidal waters out to the vegetation (SAV) at or adjacent travelway into Pirate's Cove and there is no SAV detritus on the to project site? If so describe foreshore to indicate existence of SAV in the near shore waters. This the spatial extent, project will not have any adverse effect on SAV. The pier structure is long-standing as is the boat usage. What is typical salinity and Salinity varies somewhat seasonally but is typically in the 25-30 ppt. temperature regime/range? Temperature varies seasonally from approximately 30 degrees in the winter to 70 degrees in the summer. What is the normal frequency of There is no site disturbance per se. Activity varies seasonally, but site disturbance, both natural there is regular boating access to and from the dock facilities in this and man-made? cove. Most boating activity is between April and November and is attributable to the commercial lobster and clamming operations as well as recreational boating from Pirates Cove Marina and numerous private docks. What is the area of proposed Approximately '1110 acre will be directly impacted by this dock repair impact (work footprint & far and modification project. afield)? Step 3. This section is used to describe the anticipated impacts from the proposed action on the physical/chemical/biological environment at the project site and areas adjacent to the site that may be affected. Impacts Y N Description Nature and duration of ~-~ It is anticipated that the impacts from this project will be activity(s) ~f small because of the limited nature of the work which can ~ take place in as little as a month. Boating activity is mostly ~ during June, July, and August. Will benthic community be X The benthic community will be only marginally disturbed by disturbed? the marine construction barge and push boat and propulsion systems. No excavation or filling is proposed and the dock facility will be repaired or modified in place. New piles are few and will have limited impact. Will SAV be impacted? X No SAV have been observed in the project areas and no adverse impact to SAV is foreseen as a result of this project. Will sediments be altered and/or X Sedimentation rates in the shallow sub tidal zones will not sedimentation rates change? change as a result of this project; this pier and landing is an open pile and timber structure. Will turbidity increase? X Turbidity, on a day to day basis, will not change significantly from existing conditions. (See attached narrative) Turbidity may increase during construction equipment positioning, but that activity will be of limited duration. The float is being added to minimize bottom sediment disturbances. Will water depth change? X No changes in water depth are proposed for construction equipment access or for boating operations. Will contaminants be released X The likelihood of contamination from this pier / dock into sediments or water reconstruction will be minimal. column? Will tidal flow, currents or wave X No, this is a open, wood pile and timber dock facility which patterns be altered? will not adversely affect water flow and circulation. Will ambient salinity or X No changes to salinity or temperature of tidal waters will temperature regime change? result from this project. Will water quality be altered? X Water quality should not change to a significant extent as a result of this project beyond the intermittent bottom sediment disturbances resulting from marine equipment repositioning. Step 4. This section is used to evaluate the consequences of the proposed action on the functions and values of EFH as well as the vulnerability of the EFH species and their life stages. Identify which species from the EFH species list (generated in Step 1) will be adversely impacted from the action. Assessment of EFH impacts should be based upon the site characteristics identified in Step 2 and the nature of the impacts described within Step 3. The Guide to EFH Descriptions webpage (http:llwww.nero.noaa.govlhcdllist.htm) should be used during this assessment to determine the ecological parameters/preferences associated with each species listed and the potential impact to those parameters. j j imP ct Will functions and values of ~ EFH be impacted for:~~ ~ Spawning The shallow sub-tidal zone and intertidal zone are currently sandy gravel strewn with stones and boulders and will remain so without regard to the project. No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed. Nursery The shallow sub-tidal zone and intertidal zone is currently boulders and sandy gravel and will remain so. No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed. The shade and protective / cover provided by the dock facility should be beneficial attributes for juvenile and larvael stage fisheries. Forage ~ The shallow sub-tidal zone and intertidal zone are currently boulders ~ and sandy gravel and will remain so. No adverse impact to ~ submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated if it does exist in nearby / waters. No SAV has been observed during site surveys or subsequent visits. Shelter i / The shallow sub-tidal zone and intertidal zone are currently sandy ~ gravel with shoreline stone and boulders and will remain so as a / result of this project. No SAV has been observed during site ~] surveys. ~?~ ~ It is envisioned that any impacts experienced as a result of this Will impacts be temporary or ~½ permanent? ~ ~ reconstruction project will be temporary and not permanent. The ~ ~ area of coverage of the dock facility is small compared to the area of ~;~ Inner Bay I Pirate's Cove and of no consequence compared to the ~ ~ overall coastal shoreline fringe habitat and of Fishers Island. Will compensatory mitigation be ~ ~1 No compensatory mitigation is proposed for this project. This used?/ ! project is only to repair and modify an existing dock facility in the ~ same location and to the same dimensions, adding a float out to deeper water. Step 5. This section provides the Federal agency=s determination on the degree of impact to EFH from the proposed action. The EFH determination also dictates the type of EFH consultation that will be required with NOAA Fisheries. Federal Agency's EFH Determination x There is no adverse effect on EFH Overall degree of EFH Consultation is not required adveme effects on EFH (not including The adverse effect on EFH is not substantial. compensatory mitigation) will be: This is a request for an abbreviated EFH consultation. This worksheet is being submitted to NMFS to satisfy the EFH (check the appropriate Assessment requirement. statement) The adverse effect on EFH is substantial. This is a request for an expanded EFH consultation. A detailed written EFH assessment will be submitted to NMFS expanding upon the impacts revealed in this worksheet. Step 6. Consultation with NOAA Fisheries may also be required if the proposed action results in adverse impacts to other NOAA-trust resources, such as anadromous fish, shellfish, crustaceans, or their habitats. Some examples of other NOAA-trust resources are listed below. Inquiries regarding potential impacts to marine mammals or threatened/endangered species should be directed to NOAA Fisheries' Protected Resources Division. SpeCieS knOWn to OCCur DeScribe habitat !mp~ type (iiei~ PhYSiCal, chemiCal, or biOlOg!cat: at s to ( st OtherS that disruption of spawning and/or egg deVelOpment habitat juvenile nursery' may ~piy) and/or adult f~ihg or migratiOh habitat). alewife blueback herring rainbow smelt Atlantic sturgeon Atlantic menhaden American shad AmeriCan eel Physical changes, not disruptive to any stage American lobster Physical changes, not disruptive, not observed at this site blue mussels Physical changes, not disruptive, new habitat for all stages soft-shell clams quahog Physical Changes, not disruptive, no adverse impact to any stage. Other species: APPLICATION YORt~I~ARTMENT1 OF rH~ ARMY PERMIT OMB APr ROY:AL NO' O?1( '0030EXPIRES3tAugust 2 '~ (33 CFR 325) 12 Public reposing burd~ fro- this collection of information is estimat~l to avo-age 5 hou~ po' release, including th~ time for r~viewing instmctiorts, searching existing data source, garbling and maintaining the data needed, and completing and revi~ving the coll~-tion of ~. S~gl .nmner0s reg~ this burden estimate of any other a~p~ct of this coll~ion of infommti~x, including sug~ f~ r~ lifts bul~ to l~ of D~fem~, W~ H~ ~ ~e of of [nfa~mation Operations and Rq~o~s, 1215 Je~ff~r~ll Dav~ Highway, Sui~ 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Ofli~ of Mana~ and ~ Pap~w<~k Reductioa Project (0710-0003), Washingt~ DC 20503. Pleas~ DO NOT RETURN your form to ¢ifl~r of~o~ addr~sse~ Comple~d appIicatiom must b~ submiOed to th~ District En~ having juris~ion ovex the location ofth~ pro~ a~ivity. l. APPLICATION NO. 5. APPLICAIxrPS NAME ~ BRL~N DEBROFF 6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 2220 HUNTINOTON TPKE. TRUMBULL, CT 06611 7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS W/AREA CODE ~ R~id~n~ (203) 913-1605 4.DATE APP. COMPLETED g. AUTHORIZED AOENTn~ NAME & TITLE DOC'KO, INC. KEITH B. NEILSON, P.E P. O. BOX 421 MYSTIC, CT 06355 10. AOEN~S PHONE NOS W/AREA CODE b. Businesa b. auain~ (860) 572-8939 1 I. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION I hereby authodze, DOCKO, 1NC. to act in my bdudfas my ag~t in th~ proc~amg of this ~on and to furnish. ~ ~ MR. BRIAN DEBROFF NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR 11! LE (See NEW RAMP AND FLOAT 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOW (if applicable) WEST HARBOR 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT LAIIIODE: 41° 15' 37.86"1q LONGITUDE: 72° 01Y 30.50" W 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, (Se~ instruction) WEST HARBOR, FISHERS ISLAND 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE 14. PROJECT STP~EET ADDRESS (if applicable) 271 GLOAMING EXTENSION ~ISHERS ISLAND, NY 06390 ENO FORM 4345, SEPT. 2069 EDITION OF OCT 2004 I~ OBSOLETE. Prolnn~lt:CECW.OR THIS pROJECT IS TO REPAIR AN EXISTING PIER AND INSTALL A NEW FLOATING DOCK WITH HINGED ACCESS RAMP, FLOAT RESTRAINT PILES AND BOAT TIE-OFF pILES ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE AND REPAIR AN EXISTING LONGSTANDING STONE SEAWALL. 19. Project Purpose (1)~cribe the rca~n or lmi~oso of lh~ pr°ject, s~ instmcfi°m) THE SEAWALL REPAIR PROTECTS THE PROPERTY AND THE DOCK REPAIR AND MODIFICATIONS SUPPORT RECREATIONAL BOATING. 20. Rgason (s) for Discharge N/A 21. Type (s) of Material Being Discharged and tl~ Amount of Each Type in Cu~i¢ yarda N/A 22. Surface Area in A~cz of Wclland~ or Oshet Wal~s Filled (see insuuctiom) ACRES or N/A LINEAR FEET 23. DescrilNion of Avoidance, Minimiz~i°~ and C°~c~ (s~ inz~n~fi°m) NONE NEEDED. 24. lsAnyPo~ionof~h~WorkA/readyC4m~/~. X~ yc~ __No /fyF, g, dcac~ib~t/~com~le~dwo~k THERE HAS BEEN A FIXED pIER AT THIS PROPERTY FOR DECADES, PERHAPS BACK INTO THE 1960~. please attach a Sul~lcmcntal list). 26. Li~t of Othea- Cer~ificaaiona or Apl~ovals/D~iala Received f~om ~¢h~a' Fedand, Stal~ or Local Ageaciea f°~ W°~k Deacrill~d in l~ni~ Apglicafi°n AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENT. NIJMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED NYS DEC TIDAL WETLANDS Pending Apr-12 pending NYS DOS CZM CO~SISTANCY Pending Apr-12 Pending TOWS OV so~rraOrD Tn)AL WETLANDS Pending 1 -Apr Pending DATE DENIED ENG FORM 4345, SEPT 2009 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistency Assessment Form An applicant, seeking a permit, license, waiver, certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subj eet to the New York State Coastal Management Program (CMP), shall complete this assessment form for any proposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations (15 CFR 930.57). It shonld be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicanfs certification of consistency. A. APPLICANT (please print) 1. Name: Mr. Bdan DeBmff 2. Address: 2220 Hutington Tpke., Trumbull, Connecticut 06611 3. Telephone: Area Code (203) 913-1605 B. PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1. Brief description of activity: The proposed project is to repair an existing pier and install a new floating dock with hinged access ramp, float restraint piles and boat tie-off piles all watenvard of the apparent high water line and repair an existing longstanding stone seawall. 2. Purpose of activity: I The proposed project is for dock modifications to lower the deck height of the pier and to construct a ramp and float. , new 3. Location of activity:. Suffolk County Town of Southold 271 Gloaming Ext. County City, Town, or Village Street or Site Description 4. Type of federal permit/license required: US Army Corps of Engineers 5. Federal application number, if known: 6. If a state permifflicense was issued or is required for the proposed activity, identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number, iflmown: C. COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either "YES" or "NO" for each of these questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document (see footnote on page 2) which may be affected by the proposed activity. 1. Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: YES/NO a. Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? (1 l, 22, 25, 32, 37, 38, 4 I, 43) ................ [] [~ b. Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline, land under water or coastal waters? (2, 11, 12, 20, 28, 35, 44) .......................... [] [~ c. Revitalizafioldredevelopmentofadeterioratedorunderufilizedwaterfrontsite? (1) ...... 8 ~ d. Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? ( 19, 20) ...... e. Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10)... [~_ ~' f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration, development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf?. (29) ................... g. Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of ene~. (27) ........... [~. ~ h. Mining, excavation, or dredging activities, or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastalwaters? (15,35) .................................................... ['"1 .1~ i. Discharge of toxics, hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, 15, 35) ~_ ~ j. Draining of sturmwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33) ............ ["1 .~ k. Transport, storage, trentment, or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36, 39). ~] ~ 1. Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4) ............ [~ .~ 2. Will the proposed activity affect or be located in, on, or adjacent to any of the following: YES/NO b. Federally designated flood and/ur state designated erosion hazard area? (1 l, 12, 17,) ..... c. State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7) ........................ ~- ~ d. State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24) .......................... ~- ~ e. State designated important agricultural lands? (26) ............................... ~_ ~' f. Beach, dune or barrier island? (12) ........................................... []_ ~Y g. Major ports of Albany, Buffalo, Ogdensburg, Oswego or New York? (3) ............... [~_ ~ h. State, county, orlocalpark? (19,20) .......................................... ~_ _~ i. Historic resousce listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23) ........ ~_ .~ 3. Will the proposed activity require any of the following: YES / NO a. Waterfront site? (2, 21, 22) ................................................. ~ [] b. Provision of new public services or infraatxuctore in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5) .............................................. [] ~ c. Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion conU'ol structure? (13, 14, 16) ....... [~- '~ d. State water quality permit or certification? (30, 38, 40) ............................ ~ ~ e. Stateairqualitypennitorcertification? (41,43) ................................. [J '~ 4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document) .............. D. ADDITIONAL STEPS 1. If all of the questions in Section C are answered "NO", then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. 2. If any of the questions in Section C are answered "YES", then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CMP, or where appropriate, the local waterfront revitalization program document* · The proposed activity must be analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s), the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify, by their policy numbers, which coastal policies are affected by the activity, (b) briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and, (c) state how the activity is consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment, the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. E. CER'111~ iCATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMP or the approved local waterfront revitalization program, as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made, the proposed activity shall not be undertaken. If this certification can be made, complete this Section. "The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program, or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program." Applicant/Agent's Name: Mr. Brian DeBroff Address: 2220 Huntington Tpke., Tmrnbull Connecticut 06611 Telephone: Area Code (203) 913-1605 Applicant/Agent's Signature: ~ Date: F. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State, Office of Coastal, Local Government and Community Sustainability, Attn: Consistency Review Unit, 1 Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue - Suite 1010, Albany, New York 12231. a. Copy of original signed form. b. Copy of the completed federal agency application. c. Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2. The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her apphcation to the federal agency. 3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form, contact the Department of State at (518) 474-6000. *These state and local documems are available for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies, Depar~nent of environmental Conservation and DeparUnent of State regional offices, and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. Local program documents arc also available tbr inspection at the offices of thc appropriate local government. i \ Google earthmetersfeet 200 90 A Clocko s I nc, Serving the waterfront community since 1987 RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: permits@docko.com September 24, 2012 Mr. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Brian DeBroff Revised drawings Dear Mr. King: We are transmitting herewith two copies of the revised drawings with the 8 inch pile change for Mr. Brian DeBroff located at 271 Gloaming Extension on Fishers Island for your file. Please feel free to give the office a call if you have any questions. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. Cindy Bayreuther Administrative Assistant CB: cb Attachments CC: Gwenmor Marina File: 12-2~2365 DEBROFF OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 iVIAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: August 16, 2012 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for BRIAN DeBROFF SCTM#1000-10-9-14 Docko, Inc. on behalf of BRIAN DeBROFF requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to lower the deck of an existing 6' wide by 42' long pile supported pier; install an 8'x20' float with associated 3.5'x28' hinged ramp; new 10" diameter restraint piles; five (5) new 10" diameter tie-off piles; repair +57' of mortared stone seawall, all at and waterward of apparent high water. Located: 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island. SCTM# 10-9-14 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP and listed policy standards provided below. 9.3 Preserve the public interest in and use of lands and waters held in public trust by the state and the Town of Southold. A. Limit grants, leases, easements, permits or lesser interest in lands underwater in accordance with an assessment of potential adverse impacts of the proposed use, structure, or facility on public interest in public lands under water. The extension of the dock structure will result in a net decrease in public access to/on public underwater lands. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney [~ock o j I ~'1~. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O. Box 421, Mystic, GT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: permits@docko.¢om Mr. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 August 17, 2012 AUG 2 0 2012 $0uth,%ld Town B0urd of Trustees RE: DeBroff Property, Pirates Cove Dear Mr. King, We are pleased to transmit herewith a copy of the revised application drawings for the DeBmff pier and dock modifications off the Gloaming Ext., at the entrance to Pirates Cove at Fishers Island. Based on our earlier conversations with Mr. Reynolds DuPont, Jr. from Pirates Cove and similar concerns expressed by Fishers Island Utility Company, we have brought the floating dock approximately 10 feet closer to shore and deleted the fie-off piles on the west side ofthe floating dock. We believe that this will resolve boating access and channel passage way concerns of all respective parties. Mr. DeBroff is certainly amendable to these modifications and we would note that we still have more than 2 ~ feet of clearance between the float and bottom sediments at the stem of the boat in the slip, thus we comply with NYS DEC water depth criteria. I trust that you will find these modifications acceptable. I anticipate having positive reports from Fishers Island Utility Company and Mr. DuPont in time for the hearing next week and we will address these questions accordingly during the public hearing. I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you last week on this and I believe that our modification of the project are timely and will allow this process to move forward. Your assistance, as always, is appreciated. Yours Tndy, DOCKO, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN: CC: Fishem Islnad Utility Company Robert Wall Pirates Cove Marina; Reynolds Dupont NYS DEC; Aicher, Walker Brian DeBroff FILE: 12-02-2365 DEBROFF Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, emaih permits@docko.com Mr. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 August 9, 2012 AUG 13 2012 -- Southhol~ Town Baard o! Trustees Re: Brian DeBroff 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island Dear Mr. King: We are transmitting herewith the original signed green card certified mailing receipts for Mr. Brian DeBroff located at 271 Gloaming Extension on Fishers Island for your file. Please feel free to give us a call if you have any questions concerning the attachments. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC, Cindy Bayreuther Administrative Assistant CB: cb Enclosures File: 12-2-2365 DEBROFF Office Use Only )~ Coastal Erosion Permit Application ~_Wetland Permit Application __ Administrative Permit Amendment/r r an s fer~/F~tension ~_Received Application: x~ Received Fee:$~ --'"Completed Application r)!kal~ ~ __Incomplete __SEQRA Classification: Type I Type rl Unlisted Coordination:(date sent) ~cAW~c. ~ Consistency Assessment Form ~ / C~AC Referral Sent: ~|~il~ ' __Receipt of CAC Report: __Lead Agency Determination:__ _._Technical Review: ~---~i~blic Hearing __Resolution: Name of Applicant Mr. Brian DeBroff Address 2220 Huntington Turnpike, Trumbull, CT 06611 Phone Number:(203) 381-0678 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - Section 010 Block 9 Lot 14 Property Location: 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island, New York 06390 (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Oocko, Inc. (If applicable) Address: P.O. Box 421, Mystic, Connecticut 06355 Phone: 860-572-8939 Board of Trustees Application Land Area (in square feet):_ .10(+/-) Area Zoning:. R40 Previous use of property:. Residential Intended use of property:. Residential Covenants and Restrictions: Yes If "Yes", please provide copy. GENERAL DATA ~f No Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals __Yes ~' No If "Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept. '/~ Yes No Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy __.Yes __ No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date There are no known permits listed for this property. __ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? '/~ No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): The proposed project is to lower the deck of an existing 6 (+/-) FT wido by 42(+/-) Fl pile supported pior. Install an 8-FI x 20-FT float with associated ramp, restraint piles and five tie-off piles. Also repair 57(+/-)LF of mortared stone seawall, all at and waterward of the apparent high water line. Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: The proposed project is to lower the deck of an existing 6(+/-)FT wide by 42(+/-)FT pile supported pier. Install an 8FT by 20FT float with associated ramp, restraint piles and five tie-off piles. Also repair 57(+/-)LF of mortared stone seawall, al~ at and waterward of the apparent high water line. Area of wetlands on lot: None _square feet Percent coverage of lot: N/A % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? ~ No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: venical Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: feet Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): It is envisioned that environmental impacts will be minimal. Please see attached narrative Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: The proposed project is to lower the deck of an existing 6(+/-)FT wide x 42(+/-)FT pile supported pier. Install an 8-FTx 20-FT float with associated ram, restraint piles and five tie-off piles. Also rapair 57 (+/-)LF of mortared stone seawall, all at and waterward of the high water line. Arc wetlands present within 100 feet of thc proposed activity? ~ No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? ~ No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? Mortar 2 (+/-) CY (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) It is envisioned that the environmental impacts will be minima. Please see the attached narrative. Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) Brian DeBroff (print owner of property) residing at 271 Goaming Ext. (mailing address) Fishers Island, New York Mystic, Connecticut do hereby authorize Docko, Inc. (Agent) to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. (Owner s signature) Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York I, Brian DeBroff BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HFJSHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK W1LL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. SignatureI SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 7 I~'DAY OF "~ ~,a t ,20~'~ Notary Public DAVID M!NEO Notary Pub!ic My Commission Expires Sept. 30, 20~ APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Soulbold's Code of Ethics orohibits conflicts of interest on the tort of town Officers and emnlovans. The mu'nose of thil~ form is to vrovide information which can alert lbo town of oossible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is ~essarv to avoid same. (L~I oame. fir~ n~,.~iddlc initinl, cole~ you ~ applyiol in I1~ ~ of ~oraanne el~ or otl~r entity, such ~ a cempany. If ~o, iodi~ lhe other NAME OF APPLICATION: (Ch~:k all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erasion Approval of plat Mooting Exeraption from plat or official raap Planning O~her (If"Other", name the activity.) Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" include~s by blood, marriage, or business interest "Business interest~' means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%~)h~ shares. YES NO ~ If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Narae of person eraployed by lhe Town of Southold Title Or position of that person Descrihe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe: in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): ___A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applic4mt (when the applicant is a corporation); __.B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non..coq~orate entity (when applicant is not a corporation); ___C) an officer, director, pother, or craployce of thc applicant; or __.D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS I Submitted this ]~rlr~day of A~/~ ~ ~.ot ~.. Signature ' ~ ~-~ ~ PrintName ~.,~ ~, ~g4~-4~ Oocko I nc, Serving the waterfront community since 1987 RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: permits@docko.com Ms. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 August 3, 2012 Re: Brian Debroff 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island Dear Mr. King: We are transmitting herewith a notarized copy of the Affidavit of Posting and picture for Mr. Brian DeBroff located at 271 Gloaming Extension on Fishers Island. In addition I have included the original copies of the certified mail receipts for your file. Please feel free to give us a call if you have any questions concerning the attachments. DOCKO, INC, Cindy Bayreuther Administrative Assistant CB:cb Enclosures File: 12-2-2365 DEBROFF James F. King, President Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President Dave Bergen John Bredemeyer Michael J. Domino Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631 ) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Application of BRIAN DeBROFF COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING residing at (~ ~SCJLO, '~-D~E._ ~.t>.t~0~ H2-I. V/at.t~.~.c , C--~~. t~t~S5'~ being dul3; sworn, depose'and say: That on the % t> day of ~3u-0-5-' ,201, I personally posted the property known as "fit_ fie- by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wed.~ August 22~ 2012. Dated: (signature) Sworn to befor~ me this Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endomement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees --[3 Postage E] (Endorsement Required) ~3 (Endomement Required) ,_[] Postage Return Receipt Fee [~1 (Endorsement Required) PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.47 If yes, coon:linats the review process and use the FULL FAF. E] 171.o B. VVILL .~CTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, sur[ace or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste preducllon or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural rasoufces; or community or neighborhood character? Explain bdefiy: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant hah tats, or threatened or eedangereo speoe p bhefiy: C4. J communiys existing pansor'gca'~as officially adopled, or a change in useor.ntenstyofuseof and or o her n~i~;"alre's~'~rces? Exptain briefly. Growth subsequent development or related act~wt es key o be nduced by he proposed action Explain bnefly C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain b~iefiy: I D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA ICEA~? IIf yes, explain briefly: r-]Yes ~"] No E. IS THERE. OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE~ CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes expisin: PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: Foreachadversee~ectidentifiedab~ve~determinewhetheritissubstantia~~~arge~imp~rtant~r~therwisesignificant~ Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of eca~rdng; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necassa[y, add attachments or referenoe supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the preposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have Identif~d one or n~re pntenfially la rge or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed direcfiy to the FUL FAF andlor prepem a positive bedaratlo~. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the pmpesed acilo WILL NOT result In any significant adverse environmental Impects AND provide, on attachments as necassa~, lhe masono suppoding thi determination. Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Nsma of ~ ~ in ~ed ~Sighature of Res~nsible Offi~r t~ad Agen~ [] Date President Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMI~ITAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aapects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis, In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full FAF Components: The full FAF is comprised of three parts: Pa~t 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified es potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of FAF completed for this project: l...J Fart 1 U Part 2 l IPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this FAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: DA. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. DB. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be e significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration w ill be prepared,* The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preperer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona) information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Seawal{ Rel3air and Dock Modifications Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 271 Gloaming Extension, Fishers Island, New York 06390 - Suffolk County Nameof Applicant/Sponsor Bdan DeBroff Address 271 Gloamin~ Extension City/PO Fishers Island State NewYork ZipCode 06390 Business Telephone (2031381-0678 Name of Owner (if different) Address City/PO Business Telephone State Zip Code Description of Action: The proposed project is to lower the deck of an existing 6(+/-)FT wide x 42(+/-)FT pile supported pier. Install an 8 FT x 20-FT float with associsted ramp, restraint piles and five tie-off piles. Also repair 57(+/-) LF of mortared stone seawall, all at and w~tarward of the apparent high water line. Page 2 of 21 ~ Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. ~esent Land Use: [ Urban r"~ ,ndust rial []Commercial []Forest ~ Agriculture ~ Other []Residential (suburban) [ F~dral (non-farm) Total acreage of project area: ....10 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESI~ITLY AFTER COMPLErlON __ .07 acres .07 acres _acres _ .03 acres _ .03 acres 3. What is Predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: [~]Well drained ~0 % of site [] Moderately well drained % of site. []Poorly drained _ % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are clasalfied within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System?_ acres (see t NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~ Yes [] No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r~o.lo% 30 % []10-15% 30 % r~15%orgreater~0 % 6. Is project substantially Contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? []Yes [] No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes r~No 1 0. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~ yes What is the depth of the water table?. 0 to 2 (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Page 3 of 21 r~No 1 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Accordin~l to: Identif;/each species: ...... 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site. (Le., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? DYes ['~No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? If yes, explain: 1 4. Does the present site include scenic views known to be mportant to the community? DYes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of F~ver to which it is tributary 1 6. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: ]']Yes [-~No r'~No b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 1 7. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes []No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes []No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? r']Yes []No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? r-]Yes ~]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. 1. r-~ Yes ~No Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: .10 acres. b. Project acreage to be devaloped: .03 acres initially; .03 acres ultimetaly. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: .07 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: .002 (if appropriate) e. if the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. ;~0 % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 3 ; proposed 3 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: n/a .(upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially 1 existin~l Ultimately 1 retain i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 25 height; .30 (+/-) j. Unear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 50~+/-) 2. How much neturaJ material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes []No ~]N/A a. If yes, for whet intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Multiple Family b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclametion? Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes [] No Condominium width; 30(+/-) length. ft. __ tons/cubic yards, 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? none acres. Page 5 of 21 ~ 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? r'~ Yes ~ No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: _ If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) b. d. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes [] No Number of jobs generated: during construction months, (including demolition) Anticipated date cf commencement phase 1: __ month __ year, (including demolition) Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month year. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes r~ No 9. 3 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes r~J No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No Type. 14. Will sudace area of an ex st ng water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes []No If yes, explain: IThe pier extends to the points shown on the inter tidal zone waters, but is less than the 25% width of tho wate~wvay. Navigation .will not be adversly impacted. ........ E~]No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [] Yes 16, Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No If yes, what is the amount per month?__tons If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~ Yes r']No If yes, give name ; location any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? E]Yes d. Will r'"l No Page 6 of 21 ~ e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes I~]No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, w hat is the anticipated site life?__ years. 18. Willproject use herbicides or pesticides? OYes ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes r~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? F~Yes DNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? DYes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity__ gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 10(+/-) gallons/day. project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes [] No 24. Does If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~i~] Yes r~ No Type Town of Southold Submittal Date June 2012 City, Town, Village Flanning Board NYes N No City, Town Zoning Board E]Yes ~ No City, County Health Department DYes ~ No Other Local Agencies r"-i Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies Yes [] No State Agencies r~Yes r-] No NYS DEC NYS DOS US ACOE June 2012 June 2012 June 2012 Federal Agencies [] Yes [] No Zoning and Ranning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? nYes [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~ Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan N Site plan [] Special use permit [] Resource management plan Subdivision D Othar Page 8 of 21 ~ 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? I Residential, single family, one dwelling per lot. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? I Residential, single family, one dwelling per lot. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No changes. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? I,,, i,o changes proposed. 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~/¢ mile radius of proposed action? ~l~J Yes [] No Adjacent land uses are residential 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a 1/4 mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ["~] Yes [] No Page 9 of 21 1 0. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, police, fire protection? [].o a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic~ r'~Yes [] No I ,,I D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them, F_ Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Brian DeSroff Date Signature Title If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessmenl. Page 10 of 21 ~ Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM PROPERTY LOCATION: $.C.T.M.~ THE FOLLOWING ACTION8 MAY REQUIRIE THE 8UBMI~ION OF A J I~ (~ ~( STORM.WATEI~ GRADIN~ D~N~E ~D ER~ION GO~ROL P~ Draw 8~m u~~' G~Ki ~rmu BY A ~8IGN P~i~WN~ IN THE ITA~ OF N~ YO~ SCOPE OF WO~ - PRO~S~ CONS~U~ON rr~ ~ / WO~ ~S~ I Yea No a. Whet b t~ Total Ama of t~ Pm~ Pa~? · e S~ of Wo~ for Pm~d Cons~) Genem~ by a T~ (2") In~ Ra~ll b. w~t t~ To~l ~a L~ C~a~ de~ a~ c~s~ ~v~ as ~1 as afl a~l~ Gmu~ Db~a~ ~r the ~m~ j ~ (+ ~ SI~ Imp~enb and ~e ~anent ~a~ of 2 o~, ~ site ~an andl~ S~y Item ~a~ include all P~ ' ~ U 3 ~theSltePlanand~Su~e~ O con~ s~ ~n and st~ ~ di~ha~. ~ls -- 4 En~m~ing ~ ~a in Exc~ of ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ (5,000 S.F.) Square Fe~ of O~ Sudan? ~'AI~ OF NEW YO~, . ~d ~at h~she is ~e ..... ~.~ ~er ~or represen~five of ~e ~er or O~e~, ~d ~ d~y au~o~ ~ ~o~ or ha~ ~ffo~ed m~e ~d file ~S applic~on; ~t ~l s~emen~ con.ed ~ ~s appfimfion ~ ~e ~ ~e ~st ofh~ ~owled~ ~d ~ef; ~d · at ~e ~rk ~ be peffo~ed in ~e m~ner set fo~ ~ ~e app~cafion fded he~ Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thns~ each answer must be exl~lained in detail, listing, both sun~ortim, and non-supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 - 09 - 9 - 27.4 PROJECT NAME: Dock Modifications (Linda Borden) The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Board Building Dept. Board of Trustees X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Nature and extent of action: The proposed proiect is to lower the deck of an existing 6(+/-)FT wide x 42(+/-) Fl' pile supported pier. Install an 8-FT x 20-FT float with associated ramp, restraint piles and five tie-off piles. Also repair 57(+/-)LF of mortared stone seawall, all at and waterward of the apparent high water line. Location of actio~ Site acreage: ~ Present Land use: Present Zoning Classification: 271 Gloamin~ Extension. Fisl~rs Island. NY 06390 Residential Residential If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: a) Name of applicant: Brian DeBroff b) Mailing Address: 2220 Huntington Tpke., Trumbull, CT 06611 c) Telephone number: Area Code (203) 913-1605 d) Application number, if any Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency?. Yes X No If yes, which state or federal Agency?. US ACOE, NYS DEC Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable The proposed dock repairs and modifications make appropriate beneficial use of an existing waterfront site and complies with environmental design factors published by the NYS DEC, and the DOS Coastal Management Program, Southold Local Law No. 6, 2004 and the Southold LWRP. The pier will be modified to 5 feet above mean low water and 6 or more feet deck height over the bottom sediments. Rails will be 42 inches above the deck. There will be no impairment of waterflow or navigation. The travel way into Pirates Cove is 50 feet or so beyond the floating dock facilities. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. __ Yes __ No X Not Applicable 2 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria X Yes No Not Applicable The proposed repairs and modification will improve aesthetics by lowering an unusually high pier and will make this facility in keeping with aesthetics of dock facilities on adjacent properties. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable The repaired seawall / retaining wall will continue to protect the site from erosion from storm induced waves and flooding. The repaired and modified dock facilities will be built of heavy duty piles and timbers with stout, bolted connections capable of withstanding flooding immersion and waves typically experienced at this site. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. Yes __No X Not Applicable This project will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island, being a shoreline structure located in Marine waters (salt water) there is no fresh water source, surface or subsurface, in the area of the piles supporting the dock facility. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes ~No __Not Applicable This dock facility is and will remain an open wood pile and timber structure which will not impede or divert water flow and circulation or alter long shore sediment transport or erosion or deposition of sediments. The float will extend out beyond the pier which will decrease the degree of bottom disturbance attributable to berthing / departure maneuvering. It has also been generally observed that floats provide habitat and shelter for juvenile fish, protection from predation. The wood pile and timber products for this project are consistent with NYS DEC and Town of Southold regulations. The seawall repairs will be using stone and mortar, both basically inert materials. 3 Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this proiect. No emissions will be generated. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southoid from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. __ Yes No X Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this proiect. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes __ No X Not Applicable The existing stone wall creates a nearly ve~ical face through the intertidal zone. The public trust lands and waters constitutes the area between the mean high water line and mean low water line and the resources are from the high tide line, out. These environmental resources are being protected by the design standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the reconstruction of the pier and landward seawall repa'u's at and above the apparent high water line are not likely to influence or change this fact. Nonetheless, in the lowering of the pier, at least 5 feet clear separation will be maintained between the bottom of the stringer for public passage beneath, should such access be necessary. WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No __ Not Applicable This dock facility and the modifications proposed are supporting recreational boating, a water dependent use. The current dock site will be retained and the float location stops in 4 feet of water in accordance with DEC standards and well short of the travel way in and out of Pirates Cove. 4 Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No __ Not Applicable This project really changes little in terms of sustainable resources in Fishers Island Sound and Long Island Sound because the scope of work is only a modification which installs a float beyond the pier; no change in boat slips or access but definitely less aesthetic and physical habitat impact because the slip will be in deeper water and the pier height will be reduced. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any agricultural or aquaculture industries or enterprises. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any energy or mineral mining or processing operations. PREPARED BY: TITLE: _Agent DATE:_May 2012 Keith B. Neilson, P.E.- Docko, Incorporated Clocko, Inc, Serving the waterfront community since 1987 RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: permits@docko.com Mr. James King, Presidem Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 July 3, 2012 ,_UL J -' Re: Brian DeBroff 271 Gloaming Extension Fishers Island Dear Mr. King: Per my conversation with Elizabeth on Wednesday June 27, 2012, I am transmitting herewith 3 copies of the revised Town of Southold application forms and drawings for Mr. Brian DeBmff located at 271 Gloaming Extension on Fishers Island for your review. Please feel free to give us a call if you have any more questions. CB: cb Enclosure File: 12-2-2365 DEBROFF Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. Cindy Bayreuther Administrative Assistant Docko, I nc, Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: permits@docko.com Southold Board of Trustees JUN 2 § 2012 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Brian DeBro ,ff~ris'n~,~ i~}~!?~rJ*°ggs Dock Modifications & Seawall Repair West Harbor, Fishers Island Dear Mr. King: On behalf of Mr. Brian DeBroff, we enclose herewith the following in support of his permit application for dock modifications and seawall repair in West Harbor on Fishers Island. Three prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: Applicant: Date: "Dock Modifications & Seawall Repair" West Harbor Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Brian DeBroff February 1, 2012 Three copies of the Southold Board of Trustees permit application, SEQR- Part 1, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, site photographs and location map and topographic and boundmy survey of the site. Check in the amount of $500.00 payable to the Town of Southoid, for the tidal wetlands and coastal erosion permit. One copy of each of the other applications to regulatory agencies. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, lINC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:cb Enclosures CC: Brian DeBroff US ACOE, NYS DEC, NYS DOS FILE: 12-02-2365 DEBROFF N N/F Plm--OP~:~'I'Y OF FISH EP-..~ I~LANE) Pl;~OI:::'Ek~FY of' E:)EBI;2.OFF OF LOC:Z.A-I-ION i'-'IAI:::' ~a~rr.~(:~ CF-¢~1': 1~214- 1. 8L.EVAllON DATUM I~ N~VD 2. TIDE DATA t~ T, aC~EN P-'eOM 2012 NOAA T,z~,L.E~ REFERENCE: N~ WA~ OF ~E ~NT HIOH . ~OATtN~, THE ~EAW/N-L ~ i ¢C'F~ '5. THF_~E AI:::C~IC.,ATION DI;~'W1N~ A COMPILATION OF ..~LJI~v'EY~ FOR I:~P. MIT I:~J ~242OCF-~. THEY' AEE NOT GON~'q~UC'flON CONT~C,,CT DOC:UMENT~. A TO'qVN BtJILDIN~ MAY BE ~A,'E~T: P15HEI2~ iSLAND Ulll ITY COMPANY lNG. PO B, OX E FIE~-'IEI;~.~ I.~LAND, NY ELM~:2RD, NY 10~2~ PROJECT: O0~K I~IOI~IF'I~.ATION~ ~nd ~EAW. ALL. ¢IJN--KOLK COUNTY, NEW 'WATER%VA¥: WF_~T ~ - 12112.A, TE.~ ~ DAT~ F'EBRU.~ 1. 2012 APPLICcNNT: BI~N AGENT: ~H~='r 1 Of= ~- EDOCKO, INC. K~4th B. N~I, PB My~c, CT 8~0 572 893~ FAX ~60 5'/2 75~ D'W'~ 12-2-23~5 EMAII.: perrn~dc~--I~,com N ELEVATION ~ I I I I I CME ,~,~,~fl ~e~ I-~nd ~urw. ylng ~. N PIOOIFY ~E~ OEC~ ELEVATION ~ E~k~ED ON N~v'~ 19~ ,.APPROVED BY BOARD OFTRUSTEES "TOWI~OF SO'HOLD ELEVA~ON=7~E i PIER 5UPPOI~ RtE P. EPI..~GE A~ NECE..~E~RY ~ 8AN MA~MUM ~EA'A/ALL ET~LF , FACE - I~E..~AII2 A~ NEC~ CTYP) I I I I i I I NOTE: D~-.CK~N~ - I~ NOT TO MU~T B~ ~E~'T~ BY ~T ~IP ~UN~L ~~ I I I I A~ENT: ~:,HE.E'I' ~- OF 4 C::;' C::)C::: K.C::), IN(:::::.