Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3771TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD BUILDING DEPA l~.Tbl ENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTI1OLD. N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL ~ ~,~.,~...~...~:. J :.,.~./. ....... PLEASE 'rAKE NOVICE that your application dated, . ~~.. ~ ....... 19 ~ ~.. ,.o~,,~,,~,o ~o,~.~. ~.. ~ ~.~.~ .......................... ~, I.ocation or Property ............. ~.~ .~, ..... ~~ ................. IIo~e No. Street ~ I 0.1 II ~ ]~.~ County Tax Map No. lO00 Section . .0. fi~ ~. ...... Block .... o.b ....... l.ot A.~..$.~..q Y. $, I Subdivision ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No .................. is returned herewith and diaal, provcd o,, the following grounds. C~.'.~..~..~....~.../.~.. 7.3. ? 'q . '...~...'.~-~. ~,~,.~ .z .~. .;. q ? : .~. . ~. . ~. . ~ . ?. . ~ . .~ . .~. ...¢. ~.~....~7.~....~.g. ......... Building Inspector APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI JAMES DINIZIO, JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD " STATE ROAD 25 P.O. BOX 1179 $OUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 FAX No. (516) 765-1823 May 22, 1989 Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin, P.E. Peconic Associates, Inc. One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Appl. No. Dear Merl: 3770 and 3771SE - Port of Egypt As a follow-up to our conversation today, please let this confirm that you have agreed to send five prints of the following concerning the above applications pending with our office for a proposed principal boat-storage building: (a) Five prints of a survey or site plan maps showing all buildings, including the proposed. {If possible, it would be helpful to show the outside areas presently used for boat storage that will remain. If no outside storage of boats are shown, we will assume that those boats will then be stored inside and those areas will no longer be used for outside boat storage.} (b) Five prints of the elevation plan of the building showing the total height, especially the distance from ground level to the peak. Also acknowledged is the fact that we have as of last Thursday received the SEQRA coordination letter from the Planning Board, as lead agency, and our Department would coordinate comments (if any) within the next 25+- days. As you know, the premises has been re-designated on the newly adopted Master Plan Zoning Maps. As you are aware, when the applications were filed with our office, the previous zoning code regulations were applicable. Since all files must be updated under the new zoning plan, the following provisions Page 2 - May 22, 1989 To: Merlon E. Wiggin, Re: Appl. No. 3770 & Poe. 3771 - Port of Egypt according to our records will apply for the same or similar relief: Zone District: M-II As Per Section 100-122 (Bulk Schedule), Variances Needed Based on the following: Front Yard Requirement: 50 ft. minimum Side Yard Minimum: 25 ft. minimum Rear Yard Minimum: 25 ft. minimum ,(,Special Exception application now appears obsolete see Article XII, Section 100-121, which lists under Permitted Uses," Subparagraph (5) - "Boatyards for building, storing.., subject to site plan approval from the Planning Board." Please check one of the following two choices, sign and return a copy of this letter as early as p~ssible: { ) that you hereby authorize a correctFbf your applications by our office staff in order to update the same and apply the above-noted provisions of law for this proposed principal boat-storage building; OR: { } that you prefer to have the subject applications update, together with your Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector, particularly to determine whether or not additional provisions of law apply. Yours very truly, GERARD p. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Authorized Signature APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI JAMES DINIZIO, JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 FAX No. (516I 765-1823 COORDINATED S.E.Q.R.A. RESPONSE TO: FROM: DATE: S.UBJECT: Southold Town Planning Board, as Lead Agency Southold Town Board of Appeals June 2, 1989 Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. CTM #1000-56-6-3.2, 3.3, 4., 6.1 Property Location: S/s Main Road, Southold In response to your May 17, 1989 Lead Agency coordination request, the following comments are furnished for your consideration: 1. This Board, by its letter dated September 26, 1988, reiterates its position recommending that the Planning Board take lead agency status (copy of letter attached citing reasons); 2. This Board, under SEQRA, has limited jurisdiction under Section 617.13 for Type II Actions, however, wishes to provide the following concerns and comments: a. Stormwater runoff - a description and evaluation of methods proposed for retaining all stormwater runoff, without leakage or drainage into the waterways, should be filed for consideration b. Activities and uses - a description of activities to be conducted relative to the proposed building should be described in specific detail, and sufficiently evaluated to determine possible effects on the environment, including coordination for vehicles and pedestrians at the site. To: Southold Town Planning Board Re: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. June 2, 1989 c. Drainage basins - location should be shown, including those inside of the proposed building, for evaluation of suitability and types of activities demanding its necessity. d. Elimination of upland outside boat storage (as proposed by the applicant) will help to alleviate parking concerns. Attachment (9/26/88 ZBA letter) APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS $outhold Town oard of A eals HAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOIJTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ~C~"-~T J. 3C, U3, LAS~ JOSEPH H. SAWlCK( TO: FROM: DATE: Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board of Appeals September 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. County Tax Map #1000-56-6-4 SEQRA Lead Agency Gentlemen: U~on reviewing applications which were recently filed with our office concerning the above premises, please be advised that the Board of Appeals has taken the following position under the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA): 1. Application must be filed with the Southold Town Planning Board; 2. Recommend that the Planning Board take Lead Agency status for the following reasons: ae the site plan elements and physical construction of the roadway, drainage facilities, landscaping, will be major changes directly to the site; the application under consideration in this application before the Board of Appeals is not directly related to physical change of the land or wetland areas. 3. Suggest that determinations be made by the Planning Board as to the sufficiency of parking spaces for the multiple uses existing at the site, after allowing for egress, ingress, loading, ramps, trailer lift parking, landscaping, etc., if possible, in either a preliminary review or during the certification process. The applicant is simultaneously herewith advised that he must proceed through your office accordingly. Please keep us advised of developments under the Site-Plan and SEQRA processes. Thank you. cc: Office of the Town Trustees P comc Assoc ^ s, l c. Environmental Planners & Consultants Nay 25, 1989 One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, Now York 11944 (5 ! 6) 477.0030 Fax (516) 477-0198 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer - Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road State Road 25 P. O. Box 1179 Southold, L. I. New York - 11971 Re: Dear Mr. Goehringer: Application No. 3770 and 3771SE Port of Egypt Reference is made to your letter of May 22, 1989 in regard to the above referenced project. Enclosed are the following: o Property Plan - 5 copies. o Project Site Plan - 5 copies. o Supplementary Parking Plan 5 copies with letter of transmittal. o Site Survey - 1 copy. Based on conversations with the Owner, it is his intent to discontinue all outside rental storage with the construction of the proposed storage building. Thank you for your prompt and comprehensive fo}low-up of our telephone conversation. If we can be of further help, please do not hesitate to contact either Bill Lieblein or myse]f. Sincerely, PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. e~~rlo~~.D.,M.E. President Enclosures: Per cc: Mr. William Listing Above. Liebleln APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI JAMES DINIZI0, .JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 FAX NO. (516) 765-1823 May 22, 1989 Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin, P.E. Peconic Associates, Inc. One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Appl. No. 3770 and 3771SE - Port of Egypt Dear Merl: As a follow-up to our conversation today, please let this confirm that you have agreed to send five prints of the following concerning the above applications pending with our office for a proposed principal boat-storage building: (a) Five prints of a survey or site plan maps showing all buildings, including the proposed. {If possible, it would be helpful to show the outside areas presently used for boat storage that will remain. If no outside storage of boats are shown, we will assume that those boats will then be stored inside and those areas will no longer be used for outside boat storage.} (b) Five prints of the elevation plan of the building showing the total height, especially the distance from ground level to the peak. Also acknowledged is the fact that we have as of last Thursday received the SEQRA coordination letter from the Planning Board, as lead agency, and our Department would coordinate comments (if any) within the next 25+- days. As you know, the premises has been re-designated on the newly adopted Master Plan Zoning Maps. As you are aware, when the applications were filed with our office, the previous zoning code regulations were applicable. Since all files must be updated under the new zoning plan, the following provisions Page 2 - May 22, 1989 To: Merlon E. Wiggin, P.C. Re: Appl. No. 3770 & 3771 - Port of Egypt according to our records will apply for the same or similar relief: Zone District: M-II As Per Section 100-122 (Bulk Schedule), Variances Needed Based on the following: Front Yard Requirement: 50 ft. minimum Side Yard Minimum: 25 ft. minimum Rear Yard Minimum: 25 ft. minimum Special Exception application now appears obsolete (see Article XII, Section 100-121, which lists under "Permitted Uses," Subparagraph (5) - "Boatyards for building, storing.., subject to site plan approval from the Planning Board." Please check one of the following two choices, sign and return a copy of this letter as early as possible: {~} that you hereby authorize a correc~of your applications by -our office staff in order to update the same and apply the above-noted provisions of law for this proposed principal boat-storage building; OR: { } that you prefer to have the subject applications update, together with your Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector, particularly to determine whether or not additional provisions of law apply. Yours very truly, Af/t ho r i z ed~T-~h atu~ GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 S0UTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, .IR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI TO: Southold Town Planning Board FROM: Southold Town Board of Appeals DATE: September 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. SEQRA Lead Agency County Tax Map #1000-56-6-4 Gentlemen: Upon reviewing applications which were recently filed with our office concerning the above premises, please be advised that the Board of Appeals has taken the following position under the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA): 1. Application must be filed with the Southold Town Planning Board; 2. Recommend that the Planning Board take Lead Agency status for the following reasons: the site plan elements and physical construction of the roadway, drainage facilities, landscaping, will be major changes directly to the site; the application under consideration in this application before the Board of Appeals is not directly related to physical change of the land or wetland areas. 3. Suggest that determinations be made by the Planning Board as to the sufficiency of parking spaces for the multiple uses existing at the site, after allowing for egress, ingress, loading, ramps, trailer lift parking, landscaping, etc., if possible, in either a preliminary review or during the certification process. The applicant is simultaneously herewith advised that he must proceed through your office accordingly. Please keep us advised of developments under the Site-Plan and SEQRA processes. Thank you. cc: Office of the Town Trustees · /,:~.~: n:t,>/Lc,~ /~'~?/';L,/<Z:, ~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H.$AWICKI September 26, 1988 Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin, P.E. Peconic Associates, Inc. One Bootleg Alley, Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Appl. Nos. 3771 and 3770 - Port of Egypt Enterprises CTM #1000-56-6-3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 6.1 Dear Merl: This letter is to confirm that the above project is being coordinated among the involved agencies, and that it appears that the Southold Town Planning Board will act as the lead agency under the SEQRA process. In the interim, please be sure to file the site-plan application with the Planning Board in complete form as early as possible in order to allow full processing of same under SEQRA. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN lk Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: From: Date: Re: Frank J. Kujawski, President of theTrustees Bennett Orlowski,Jr., Chairman of the Planning Board September 19, 1988 Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. SCTM #1000-56-6-2 The Planning Board reviewed your letter and the accompanying materials. A site plan will be required. Consequently, the Board would like to be lead agent in the environmental review. However, a site plan application has not been filed as of this date. When the application is filed, an overall plan showing the entire site must be included. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. cc: Building Department Zoning Board Conservation Advisory Council jt FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Ill JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 14, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Application No. 658 - Port of Egypt, Inc. 1000-056--4 & 6 - 10.1-11-13-.2-3.2-3.3-4-6.1 Dear Mr. Greene: Please be advised that this office has received a partial application in the above referenced matter. Pursuant to the Code of the Town of Southold, the Board of Town Trustees will not act upon an application until it is deemed complete by the submission of documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been received. Please keep this office informed of your progress in this matter. We wish to be involved in your environmental review under the S.E.Q.R.A. Legislation. Feel free to contact this office at (516) 765-1932 should you have any questions in regard to this matter. ,.~ery trul~ours~ ~7~Frank A.IK~jawski, Jr., Pres. Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip Attachment cc: Peconic Associates, Inc. on behalf of Port of Egypt, Inc. Army Corps of Engineers New York State Dept. of State Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council Planning Board Board of Appealsu/ FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TO.tN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 14, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, Main Road Southold, New York 11981 Re: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. 1000-056-4 & 6-10.1-11-13.2-3.2-3-4-6.1 Dear Benny: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of Lead Agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a Completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. Requested Action: To erect a 25,440 sq. ft. boat storage building. SEQRA Classification: ( ) ~Pype I ( ~ Unlisted Contact Person: Ilene Pfifferling, Clerk on behalf of Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Pres. Board of Town Trustees The Lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project should one be necessary. Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being the lead agency. Trustee Board Position: This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other. Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, .' K~j ski, Jr. President ' Board of Town Trustees FAK: ip Attachment cc: Bldg. Dept. Board of Appeals D.E.C. Stony Brook Peconic Associates on behalf of the Port of Egypt, Inc. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, 1II JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOI~N OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 14, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Application No. 658 - Port of Egypt, Inc. 1000-056--4 & 6 - 10.1-11-13-.2-3.2-3.3-4-6.1 Dear Mr. Greene: Please be advised that this office has received a partial application in the above referenced matter. Pursuant to the Code of the Town of Southold, the Board of Town Trustees will not act upon an application until it is deemed complete by the submission of documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been received. Please keep this office informed of your progress in this matter. We wish to be involved in your environmental review under the S.E.Q.R.A. Legislation. Feel free to contact this office at (516) 765-1932 should you have any questions in regard to this matter. /~ery trul~/~oursf [_ ~/-~Frank A.IK~jawski, Jr., Pres. Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip Attachment CC: Peconic Associates, Inc. on behalf of Port of Egypt, Inc. Army Corps of Engineers New York State Dept. of State Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council Planning Board Board of Appeals 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applica-nts and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. . The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 f-lpart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Part. s 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will I~ prepared. [] B. Although the proiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaralion will be~)repared.' [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. . r * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Olficer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officerl Date · PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTIC{:: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona, information you believe win be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Port of Egypt EnterprEses, Inc. Rte. 25, Southold, N.Y. 11971 I EUSINE~TELEPNONE I~c. - Merlon Wiggin~ Pres. (516)477-0030 NAME OF APPLICANT~PONSOR PeconEc Asso~iates~ ADDRESS __ One BootleR Alley CITYI~O I STATE ZIP CODE ~roonpnrt { N.Y. 11944 NAME OF O~NNER (If ditflrm~l) I BUSINE~ TELEPHONE Bill Lieblein ~ Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. ] (516)765-2445 ADDRE~ Rte. 25 Cl~l~ J STATE ZIP CODE --- S o ut h o'l-d ................................................ { N.Y. 11971 OE~RI~ION OF A~ION errection of a 25,440 Sq. Ft. boat storage building Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A...Site Desorlptlon Physical setting of overall projec~/i~o~h devei°Ped and ~,ndevelop~d ~reas.' ' 1. Present land use: I-IUrban ~lndustrial [']Forest I-1Agrtculture 2. Total acreage of project area: 2.1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 Forested O 0 Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area - water 0. 1 0 Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 2.0 Other (Indicate type). 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site{' [:]Commercial [:]Residential (suburban) [:]Other I-1Rural (non-farm) Fd - Fill Land. PRE SE NT~.'~ AFTER COMPLETION acres 0 acres acres 0 acres acres 0. 1 acres acres 0 adres acres 2.0 acres Drod~od M,q l',fi Fi 3 i a. Soil drainage: F'IWel{ drained % of ~ite [:]Moderately well drained 2 0 % of site I-Ipoorlv drained 80 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System~ N /A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Ate there bedrock outcroppings on project sitei~ ~lYes [~,No a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) C ¢ 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [~T0.10% 1 O0 % I-I10-15% % []15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? C]Yes ~]No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I'-IYeS ' ~]No 8. What is the depth of the water table? -+ 3 ~ tin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I-lYes [~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes 11. D°~S' pt0je~t sii:e' c-ont~in any sp'~cies ~of"pia~t' o~:'a~imal 'life ~hat is identified as threatened or endangered? . I-lYes_ [~o. . According to Identify each species 12; Are there any unique or unusual [and forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) 0-1yes [~[No Describe 13.-Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area~ r-lyes ~]No If yes, explain 14.--D°~ the pr~sen~ ~ite i~clu~e~:'~nic vYews kn0~,n~ ~0~ be impO:~t'ant' to th~ ~0mmunity? 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Iq/~ a:- Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: ~/A ' a. Name b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes ~lNo - a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to aUow connection? ~]Yes [~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? C]Yes ~}No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article-25~AA; Section 303 and 304? I--lyes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article :.of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~i'-lYes - IglNo 20. Has the site ever been used'for the disposal of solid ot hazardcms wastes? B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate} 7 a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: 2.1 acres initially; 7 c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length ot project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed O f. Number of off-street parking ~paces existing 165 ; proposed 64 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ! 5 h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family acres. acres ultimately~ (upon completion of project)? Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 45 ~ height; . ! 20 ' j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? width; 2!2~ length. 240' ft. r~ck. earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 2. How much natural material (i e 0 3. Will distt~rbed areas be reclaimed? I-lyes f-INo ~N/A a. If yes, for what intend , pUrPose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-JYes i-INo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for r~clamation? i-lYes r-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this proiect? ~lYes 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). tons/cubic yards b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes I~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction. 6 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? month month I-lYes C3No ; after project is complete 2 year, (including demolition). year.. ......... [=]Yes RaNo If Yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [qYes a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? l-lyes [:~qo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain ~Yes 15, Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F3Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? D~Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month ! tons If yes, will an existing solid wast~ facility be used? [~Yes I-INo b,. c. If yes', give name $outhold Town Land[ill ',"location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain [:]No Southold i-Wes ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? r"lyes []No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ton/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? C:]Yes ~]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [:3Yes E~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels~ DYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~]Yes .[:]No If yes , indicate type(s) ,~l~rrri~nI - h-~ld~n~ l~hrin~ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity; N / ^ gallons/minute. 300 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. (seasonal - May 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? 'l-lYes ~qNo If Yes. explain ~lNo through October) 4 25. Approv,~ts Required: ' Type Submittal Date City, Town, Viqage Board []Yes I~No City, Towr:. Village Planning Board ~X~Yes [=]No City, T._o_w_n Zoning Board [g]Yes I-INn City. County Health Department i-lYes ~No Other Local Agencies [=]Yes Other Regional Agencies I-lYes [~No State Agencies I~Yes f-INn Federal Agencies I-lYes [~No Southold Town Southold Town New York Stat~ D.E.C. C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes [:]No If Yes, indicate decision required: [=]zoning amendment ~]zoning variance ~]special use permit I-lsubdivision ~site plan f-lnew/revision of master plan ~lresource management plan ~lother 2. What is the zoningclassification(s)of the site? C-Light Industrial 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? .~e attached ~;l~n 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no chanEe from nresent - C-Light Industrial 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/~ mile radius of proposed action? see land use map g Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/~ mile? [~Yes [3No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot siz'e proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes ~qNo 11 will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? I'q Yes ~3No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []=]Yes C3No 12. will the proposed action resuk in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I=]Yes ~,No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? i'-lYes r-INn D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any aJverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor~n~e ~~~Pec°nic A_ssociate. s, Inc.. Date May 10, 1988 Signature C~'~~ ~. _ __ Title President If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are/~'~ttate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceeding with this assessment. § ' ,4.~4., .~ .sT~-~ 6 ] 7.2 ! Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility ProJect' and Resource (in hllles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-V, ~.~-z/2 V2-3 3-5 5+ · A parcel of land which Is dedicated to and available [] [] [] [] [] to the public for the use. enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? * An overlook or parcel of land dedicated 'to public [] [] [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State [] [] Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? [] [] · The State Forest Preserve? N/A [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? N'/A ' [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] [] natural features? N/A · National Park Service lands? NIA [] [] · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] or Recreational? N/A · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? N/A · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] ' [] · or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? N/A · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] scenic? N/A · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] · County road? [] [] · State? [] [] · Local road? .IX] [] [] [] [] [] [] ~r~ '0 '0 ' [] " [] 0- [] -- [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] n Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer, foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes ~No Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ~Yes ON• DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1. check those which generally describe the environment. Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial C~ommercial Urban River. Lake, Pond Cliffs. Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments aa needed surrounding Within · 1/4 mile ' *! mile 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *1/2 mile ~]Yes [-'] No *1 miles [~] Yes [-~No '2 miles [~]Yes ~'"~ No '3 miles I~r] Yes r-]No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. ,The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is 5 t,o 1 0,0 0 0 NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT ?. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQQENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work I~ [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other . [] [] [] [] FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSK[, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 1516) 765-1892 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Planning Board Building Department Zoning Board of Appeals Conservation Advisory Council Trustee Office Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. August 15, 1988 Please find attached, an application for the above re£erenced project. May we have your informal comments regarding this project at the earliest possible date? Thank you 2or your c~operation in regard to this matter. IP:hk BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TI~LEPHONE ($16) 765-1892 APPLICATION Ig HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF APPLICATION NO. IDENTITY OF APPLICANT Port ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Rte. DATE OF APPLICATION May 10, 1988 765-2445 of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. PHONE NO_ 25~ Southold, N.Y. 11971 TAX MAP no. 1000-056-4 & 6 10.1-11-13.2-3.2-3.3-4-6.1 AGENT PERMIT Peconic ~ss___o._~cia$.es, !n..c~. REOUES?Em TO erect a 25,440 477-0030 PHONE NO. Sq. Ft. boat storage building LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED Rte. 25, Southold, N.Y. 119 HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK 35' in height - LENGTH 212' Budd's Pond Southold Bay___ r Ld_.q~_,__4__5' . . WIDTH 120' HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER Floor El. 6.0' DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER N/A YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED 100 yds. (for building foundation and storm drains YARDS TO BE FILLED N/A WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR SAY FRONTING PROPERTY 1 to 2 miles DEPTH AT LOW TIDE .... ~_~ AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 2~ DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL 30 FT. DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIHILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA 0 F' IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? 'business AREA ZONING C-Li_g.~ Industrial MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL S£ REMOVED OR DEPOSITED backhoe and material wi11 be re-used for foundation grading INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY boat stor~[~_: marina DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE fishing station and boat rentals AND WHETHER ANy PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTJ AGENCy noRe to our kRow[,~.~.~ DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEy OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY site to be re-graded after construction and landscaped as per attached pl'an WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTy, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE APPLICANT, attached ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? N0 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORKiSS: Merlon E. Wiggin DAY o~ ~ ur~°- JOAN A. JACOeS Ne. 4702900 QuaJlfJod Jn Su~oJk ~ APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32 (CHAPTER EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES App rovud 2/27/85 14-16-2 '(2/87)--'7c SEQR 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applica-nts and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine sisnificance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies ~an be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full £AF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Parl 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides 8uidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identily the Portions ol EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Part. s 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] 5. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Projec! Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions wi]l be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona, intom~ation you believe wi~ be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation, If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. Rte. 25, Southold, N.Y. 11971 NAME OF APPLICANT/~PONSOR Peconic Associates? inc. - Merlon Wiggin~ Pres. ADDRESS One Bootleg Alley CITYtPO NAME OF O~NNER Ill alff~l) Bill Lieblein - Pot:{: of £gypt Enterpl:ises, Inc. ADDRESS Rte. 25 CiTY/PO Southold DESCRIPTION OF ACTION errection of a 25,440 Sq. Ft. boat storage building BUSINESS TELEPHONE {5~&)477-0030 I STATE IZIP CODE N.Y. 11944 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 765-2445 STATE ZIP CODE N.Y. 11971 Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A.. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I-1Urban [~lndustrial [=]Commercial I-IForest i'~Agriculture I-}Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 2. 1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.} Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 2S of ECL} Water Surface Area - water Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type). 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? f-IResidential (suburban) Fd - Fill Land. r-IRural (non-farm) a. Soil drainage: I-]Well drained % of s~te I-IModerately well drained 20 % of site ClPoorlv drained 80 96 of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil 8roMp I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? ~ / A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~lyes {~No a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres 0 acres 0 acres acres acres acres 0 acres acres acres 0 ,,~ acres acres U acres acres 2 . 0 acres acres acres Dredged Materlnl 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [~,0-10% 1 QO % I-I10-15% % ~115% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? EYes ][]No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site li~ted on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? CIYes [~No + 8. What is the depth of the water table? - 3 ~ tin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? EYes [~No ,~ 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I--lYes I~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? (-1Yes (~lflo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) I-lYes ~o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? E]Yes ~]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ~ I-lyes [~xNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/~ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes I-INo - wa t e r a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~lyes DNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I-'lYes ~]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~lyes rXINo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 D-[yes I~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [:]Yes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of proiect (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 7 a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 2.1 acres initially; 7 acres ultimately. c. Proiect acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/^ (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 0 %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 1 65 ; proposed 6/~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 5 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensiohs (in feet) of largest proposed structure. 45 ~ height; 1 20 ' width; 2 12 ' length. 240' i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (ie 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? fqYes DNo :g3N/A a. Ii yes, for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Vvill topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes []No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for r~clamation? I-lYes [:]No rr~ck, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? months, (including demolition). year, (including demolition). year. I-INo ; after project is complete 2 I-lyes []No If yes, explain ~Yes J~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lyes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lyes C~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction. 6 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or faciliti'es? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes [~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain r-lyes 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? I~Yes [-1No a. If yes, what is the amount per month ! tons b. If yes, will an existing solid wast~ facility be used? [~Yes i-11,4o c. If yes, give name Southold Town Landfill-- ;. location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain ~Yes [:3No Southold []Yes ~]No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ton/month. b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides~ f-lYes ~[]No 19, Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lyes [~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? I-lYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use[ ]~]Yes .[-1No If yes,indicatetype(s) plpc. rr~c~l - ~.~ldln~ l~ghr~n~o 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity; N/^ gallons/minute. 300 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. (seasonal - Hay 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? 'DYes ~No If Yes, explain I~No through October) 25. Approvals Requized: ~ Type Submittal Date City, Town, vtllage Board [3Yes ~No City, T_o_w_r:. Village Planning Board ~Yes E]No City, T_o_w_n Zoning Board ~Yes' f-lNo City, County Health Department I-lYes [~No Other Local Agencies I-lYes ~No Other Regional Agencies i-lYes ~No State Agencies ~Yes [:)No Federal Agencies I-lYes ~No Southold Town Southold Town New York Stat'e D.E.C. ~site plan is the maximum potential development of the site if developed~ as permitted by the present zoning? ~oe attached plan is the proposed zoning of the site? no change from present - C-Light Industrial is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A C. Zoning and Planning Information 1~ Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes I-1No If Yes, indicate decision required: f"lzoning amendment iX'lzoning variance ~special use permit I-Isubdivision Onew/revision of master plan Oresource managi~ment plan I-Iother 2~ What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? C-Light Industr ia l 3. What 4. What 5. What 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? RYes C]No 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '.4 mile radius of proposed action? see land use map B Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? [~Yes ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot si~e proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? fqYes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? I-lYes ~]No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proiected demand? OYes f-INo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lYes [:]No D. informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project, if there are or may be any aJverse ~mpacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge, . Peconic Associates, Inc.. Apphcant/Sponsor iSk~e _ , Date May 10, 1988 Preside If the aclion is in the Coastal Area, and you are~-~ate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceeding with Ihis assessment· 5 ¢ 6]7.2] Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional in[ormation relating to Question ] 1 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated 'to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the Mational or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? N/A · Hatlonal Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? N · Hational Hatural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? N/A · Hational Park Service lands? N/A · Rivers designated as Hationai or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? N/A · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrek? N/A · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? N / A · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? N/A Distance Between Project~ and Resource (in Miles) O-L~ ~.¥2 ~/2-3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] [] · State? [] [] [] [] [] · Local road7 [] [] [] [] [-1 Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer, foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes [X~No Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ~Yes [:]Ho DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed Within mile *l mile 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *t/3 mile [~]Yes ['-I No *l miles [~] Yes [-'1 No *2 miles [~] Yes ['-I No °3 miles ~rl Yes [~]Ho * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of vi.ewers likely to observe the proposed project is 5 HOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. 10,000 CONTEXT 7. Thesituationoractivityin whichthevJewersareengaged whileviewingtheproposedactionis FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Dally Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by. residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] 2 March 2, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: This letter authorizes PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. to act in my behalf in making applications and securing necessary permits relative to the construction of a Boat Storage Building for an existing marina (Port of Egypt Enterprises) for William Lieblein, located on Route 25 (Main Road), Southold, New York. AUTHORIZED BY: HEAR WHAT OUR CUSTOMERS SAY ABOUT PORT OF EGYPT "A credit to the boating Industry...The price actually paid for the work performed was lower than the quoted prlce...Thls Is a reflection of PORT OF EGYPTS honesty and falmess...I have been fortunate to have purchased a quality boat from a first class dealership." -- Richard L. Russo, Rivervale, NJ, in a letter to Eddie Smith, President of Grady-White. "~X/e must compliment you and you r staff for a thoroughly enjoyable experience In purchasing, rigging and commis- sioning the Sailfish ... ~,/e feel we were treated fairly, honestly and that expert workmanship went Into the boat. ~X/e would not hesitate to recommend Port of Egypt and look fonuard to seeing you this fall for winter storage and sewlce. Robert S. Nace, Woodbu~, NY "1 am very pleased with the speed with which you sold (my) ^quasport and the price achleved...(~/hen) we are In the market fora new powerboat, PORTOF EGYPT will be at the very top of the preferred list of dealers to do bus Iness with." -- Leland S. Zaubler, Philadelphia, PA 'Thank you foryour prompt and efficient service. ~/e think of you often as we frolic about beautiful (BlockJ Island, because If It were not for PORT OF EGYPT, we'd never have made Itl" -- Emily and ~lson Langworthy, New Rochelle, NY '~f~hat really Impressed us was the fact that we were treated Just as well In the purchase of a used boat as someone who bought a new boat." -- Patty and Ron Billings, ^llendale, NJ "Boat dealers are usually the type of people that close and say goodbye. You have to be the exception to the rulel... You're the bestr' -- George Dennis, Miller Place, LL, NY HOgV TO GET HERE From New York City/the Metropolitan area: Take the Long Island Expressway east to the end, exit #73. Then pick up Route 58 which becomes Route 25 (the Main Road) in Riverhead and continue east approximately 20 miles, The FORT OF EGYPT is located on Route 25 about one mile east of the center of Southold village on the way to Greenport. Watch for the red FORT OF EGYI'T sign. From Connecticut and New England: Take the Orient-New London Fern/to Orient Point at the end of Long IsLand's North Fork, Take Route 25 Itbe Main Road) approximate~/12 miles to PORT OF EGYPT, located at ~he sign of the red circle between the villages of Greenport and Southold. PORT OF EGYPT IS IDEALLY LOCATED ON LONG ISLAND'S HISTORIC NORTH FORK ON SOUTHOLI~ BAY -- Sheltered yet minutes away from open water. PORT OF EGY?T is within easy reach of the Peconics, Long Island Sound. Plum Gut, l~e Race, Gardiners Bay, Shinnecock Inlet, East Hampton, Sag Harbor, Montauk and Block Island. A DELIGHTFUL VACATION SPOTI ~c4~ile you're on the North Fork, enjoy our beautiful beaches, fine restaurants, bird sanctuaries, antique shops, country fairs and festivals, vineyards, horseDack riding, and exploring our delightful 300-year-old villages. ' Mole..~6~ 765-S121 GII~ SW[516) 765-IB30 · Shakespeare, Daiwa, Penn, Fenwick, a i'ew, plus custom built rods, made by Hal Brown of Connecticut and )F EGYPT. ~'e car~ a full supply of bait, uring the season Iplus ice) -- and offer helpful information. Telephone: ISI61 forgreatfishing! )f our Licensed Captains -- or make :n boats for bottom fishing. They leave ely 7,AM and return at about 4 PM, and , fluke, weakfish, porgies, bluefish and 3 arrange night trips or moonlight sails. I, when you don't h any yourself -- our fish market! lection of fresh caught whole or filleted flounders, swordfish, salmon, shdmp, tail or claw specials. ,Along with famous dcrumbs. ICome at the right time -- and lloaded at our dockl] Telephone: (5~6] VISIT THE TERMING POINT?" MOTEL ON BEAUTIFUL SOUTHOLD BAY -- OPEN ALL YEARI Your home away from homel Each of our twenty-one units is a suite, with two separate sleeping areas and three double beds, air conditioning, and color TV. Or enjoyyour own efficiency apar[mentl Park your car or dock your boat within steps of your room, swim at our local beaches, go fishing, enjoy four nearby restaurants, along with the museums and shops that have made Southold and breenport renowned resorts. I,And remember: ask about our money-SaVing, midweek specialslJ Telephone: 1516) 765-5121. BUY "THE PERFECT GIFT" " AT THE TERNING POINT Opened in 1982 by Kae LJebJein and Carolyn CottraL this charming shop offers special nautical and handora fi:ed items that'll makeyour visit even more memorable. Plus a dazzling selection of gift items in brass, glass, and wood. Telephone: {516) 765-1830. ENJOY ARMANDO'S SEAFOOD BARGE -- RIGHT AT PORT OF EGYPT! Armando Cappa's famous restaurant has been an East End tradition for over 20 yearsl Its delectable cuisine has won three-and-a-half hats from Barbara Radar of Newsday, and praise from other food cdtics for such specialties as lobsters, clams, scallops and finfish as well as succulent steaks -- all served up in style with a panoramic view of the PORT OF EGYPT marina and Southold Bay. Telephone: 1516~ 765-3070. Here's why PORT OF EGYPT Is unique: · Family-owned and operated for over 40 years In 1946, the Ueblein brothers -- Bill, Herman and Herb -- opened PORT OF EGYPT, a small fishing station on Southold Bay. As the post-war boating boom gained momentum, they began to increase the size of the boat rental fleet, and quickly expanded into a ftJII-scale marina. Today, PORT OF EGYPT is a Long Island landmark -- national¥- acclaimed for the quality of its service -- and an award-winning marine operation that offers you the latest models of such prestige lines as GRADY- WHITB (19611...PRIVATEER (1979J...IMPERIAL (1984)..JOHNSON OUT- BOARDS (1952)...and C_AU(INS TRAILERS (19801. But that's not alii Over the years, we've added dockage for 130 boats, a "high and dry" facility -- the first on Long Island's North Fork; plus the Teming Point Motel, The Terning Point Gift Shop, Armando's Seafood Barge Restaurant and the Port of Egypt fishmarket. During this constant growth, the Uebleins' committment to profession- alism and personal service has remained unchanged. In fact, thisyear, PORT OF EGYPT has served over 15,000 satisfied customers from as far away as Florida. g,~hile Bill Sr. still takes an active role in PORT OF EGYPT management, his son -- Bill, Jr., assisted by his brother, Peter, his sister, Elisa Thomas, and his brother-in-law Ace Cottral, now run the operation. From left to right, Bill, Kae, Bill Jr. and Karen Ueblein, Ace and Carolyn Cottral, Capt. Bill Ueblein, Elisa 'l~orn~s, Lorretta, Peter and Corey LJeblein. · PORT OF EGYPT Is the oldest GRADY-~/HITE dealership on Long Island (and) the second oldest In the countryl) As Eddie Smith, Jr., President of Grady-~(/hJte writes: "We especially enjoy watching a dealership grow, prosper and mature as we have been fortunate enough to with POET OF EGYPT MARINE. Boa' PORT OF EGYPT Is an author IMPERIAL... AND PRIVATEER. V the latest models of these top bo family fun --ranging in size from I~ go. And, because of our on-the-~ boat of your dreams before you b Through our large inventory excellent selection at competitiw specials! ~(/e help you arrange the Therefore, when you're in th~ in our showroom ,AND our large available at affordable prices. Anc~ PORT OF EGYPT Is also y BOARDS from 2 hp to 300 hI TRAILERS up to 10,000 lbs. Tele FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P, SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Planning Board BuiIding Department Zoning Board of Appeals Conservation Advisory Council Trustee Office Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. August 15, 1988 Please find attached, an application for the above referenced project. May we have your informal comments regarding this project at the earliest possible date? Thank you for your cooperation in regard to this matter. IP:hk ~ BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 T~LEPHONE (516) 765-1892 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTE£S OF THE TOWN OF APPLICATION NO. DATE OF APPLICATION May 10~ IDENTITY OF APPLIC&NT Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. ADDR£S$ OF APPLICANT Rte. 25? SouthoId~ N.Y. 11971 1988 .... 765-2445 mil TAX MAP NO. 1009-.___05____6-4 & 6 - 10.1-11-13.___2,~3.2-3.3:4-6.1 AGENT Peco__n_i_S_cAssociates? Inc. 477-0030 PHONE NO. PERMIT REQUESTED TO_ erect a 25,440 Sq. Ft. boat storage building LOCATIOM OF PROPERTY FOR BHICM PERMIT WANTED Rte. 25, Southold, N.Y. 119) HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY Budd~s Pond size oF PROPOSED WORK_ 35~ in height.- r[d_.q.~_ 45' LENGTH 212' Southold Ba~____ WIDTH 120' HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER Floor El. 6.0' DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER N/A YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED 100 yds. YARDS TO BE FILLED N/A WIDTH OF DEPTH AT (for building foundation and CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY 1 to 2 miles LOW TIDE_~ N/A_ AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 2' DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL 30 FT. DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA I~ THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? busiNess AREA ZONINO__~=L~_9.~_[ I___Endustria] MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED backhoe and materia! will be re-used for foundation grad[ng storm drains' INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY boat s.___t_~[a_%[_- marina DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE fishing station and boat rentals AGENCY none to our knowledge DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY site to be re-graded after construction and landscaped as per attached pi'an WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, IP NOT THE SAME AS THE APPLICAHT. attached ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROIIIBIT THIS PROJECT? NO COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK )SS: Merlon E. Wiggin BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN AR[ TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE Iff THE SWORN TO BEFORE ME JOAN A. JACOBS Ne, 4702900 Quallfi~l in S~.,ffod~ ~ ~l~mmi~ien Expim~ Maeah 31~ 19~/ EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT CONDITIONS, IF ANY (CHAPTER 32) EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES 2/27/85 1,~-1,6-2 '(2/87)-- 7c 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant, The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subiective or unmeasureabie. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id;ntified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Paris I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined bv the lead agency that: A. The proiect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be p~el~red. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative decla~ation will be prepared." [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaralion will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible OIficer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer1 Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona~ intormat~on you betieve wil! be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It is expected that completion of the full EAE will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavadable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME ~ ACTION Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. Rte. 25, Southold, N.Y. 11971 One Bootleg Alley Greenpnrt Bill Lieblein - Port I BUSINE~ TELEPHONE inc. - Merlon WiRRin~ Pres. (5~6)477-OO30 of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. I STATE I ZIP CODE N.Y. 11944 I B USINEM TELEPHONE (51§)765-2445 ADORES8 Rte. 25 CITYfl~O Southold STATE IZIP CODE N.Y. 11971 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION errection of a 25,440 Sq. Ft. boat storage building Please Complete Each Question-- Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site De~oriptlon Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: nUrban ~lndustrial I"lForest nAgriculture 2.1 2. Total acreage of pro)eet area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area - water Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill} Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type]. I-1Commercial i-]Other acres. nResidential (suburban) [3Rural (non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0 acres o 0 acres acres o 0 acres acres u 0 acres acres 0.1 acres 0 .,1 acres 0 acres 0 acres 2.0 acres 2 . 0 acres acres acres 3, What is predomlnant soiltype(s) on project site~ ~d - Fill Land. Dr~d~d Mar~ri~l a. Soil drainage: I-1Well drained % of site l-IModerately well drained 20 % of site r-Ipoorly drained 80 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System~ N / A acres. (Se~ 1 NYCRR 370}. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site~' l'lYes a. What is depth to bedrockS' N/A (in feet) 2 '5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [~3-10% 1 0 0 % D10~15% O15% or greater 6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I~Yes ~]No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site li~ted on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [~Yes ~No + 8. What is the depth of the water table? - 3 ~ tin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? OYes [~No 10, Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I-'lYes []No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? r-lYes I~o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) i-lYes [3~1o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r-lyes XC~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? F-lYes [~o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: iq/A a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? OYes I-1No - wa t: e r a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? DYes C]No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection~ F1Yes ~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~lYes I~lNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 I'-~Yes ~qNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes~ FIYes f'lNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 7 a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 2. I acres initially; 7 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles:, iq/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 0 %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 1 6 5 ; proposed 6 4 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour I 5 (upon completion of project)~ h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensiohs (in feet) of largest proposed structure 45 ~ height; ! 20 ' width; 212 ' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare proiect will occupy is? 240 ' ft. Condominium 3 2, How 'much natural material (i e rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? O tons/cubic yards 3. Will dist,rbed areas be reclaimed? DYes [:3No ~IN/A a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r-lYes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for r~clamation? DYes I-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. §. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes :[]No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes [~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 6 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). month year, (including demolition). month year. I-lyes DNo ; after project is complete 2 DYes []No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ['qYes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which .effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [:]Yes [:~o Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain DYes 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? D~Yes DNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month / tons # b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [~Yes E3No c. If yes, give name Sourhold Town Landfill ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain ~Yes r-INo Southold DYes ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes [rINo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ton/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes ~]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes [~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~]Yes [:]No If yes , indicate type(s) ~,l~,c. rrfcal - h,,~ ld~n~ 1 ~krJn~ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity; N / A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 300 gallons/day. (seasona 1 May 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? i-lYes f'lNo If Yes, explain ~No through October) 4 :~5.' Ap'p~ov~ls Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, \'dlage Board L~Yes ~No City, T_o._w~,~. Village Planning Board LXIYes ONo City, T_o_w_n Zoning Board [~Yes [:]No City. County Health Department l-lyes (~No Other Local Agencies [:]Yes Other Regional Agencies E3Yes I~No State Agencies [~Yes I-INo Federal Agencies ~Yes I~No C. Zoning and Planning Information Southold Town Southold Town New York State D.E.C. 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I~Yes nNo If Yes, indicate decision required: r-lzoning amendment ~zoning variance il('qspecial use permit C]subdivision [~site plan i-lnew/revision of master plan r-lresource management plan I-Iother 2 What is the zoningclassification(slof the site? C-Light Industrial 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed, as permitted by the present zoning? see attached olan 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no chan_~m from present - C-Limht Industrial 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~Yes ONo 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? see land use map 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '~ mile? I~Yes [~No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes ~No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)i~ E]Yes ~]No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [2Yes I-INo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? l-lYes [~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lYes C]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any aJverse ~mpacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. . ..... Peconic Associates, Inc.. N~m. -- . ~ Date May 10, 1988 Appllcant/>ponsor ~.,.~~ ~-~-. ~---'~- ~ ~.- -- Title Pr esi de n t Signature If the action is in the ~oastal Area, and you are~/~tate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with Ibis assessment. 5 617.21 SEQR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full E^F. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · ^ parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities~ · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated io public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · ^ site or structure listed on the Hational or State [] Registers of Historic Places~ · State Parks? '[] · The State Forest Preserve~ N/A [] · Hational Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? N/A [] · Hational Hatural Landmarks and other outstanding [] natural features? N/A · Hational Park Service lands'~ N/A [] · Rivers designated as Hational or State Wild, Scenic [] or Recreational? N / A · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] as part of the Interstate System, or ^mtrak? N/A · ^ governmentally established or designated interstate [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation~ N/A · ^ site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] Project and Resource (In Miles) O-V4 I/4-1/2 I/2-3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] na [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] scenic? N/A · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] [] · State~ [] [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer, foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes ~)C1 Ho ^re any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? I'X1Yes DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally environment. Within · 1/4 mile '1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments aa needed describe the surrounding 5. Are there visually similar projects within: · 1/2 mile []Yes I-INa · 1 miles [~Yes I--INa · 2 miles r'~ Yes · 3 miles [[]Yes []No · Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances aa appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is 5 'co NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. 10,000 CONTEXT ?. Thesituationoractivityin whichtheviewersareengaged whileviewingthepropo~dactionis FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other ~ [] [] [] [] 2 March 2, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: This letter authorizes PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. to act in my behalf in making applications and securing necessary permits relative to the construction of a Boab Storage Building for an existing marina (Port of Egypt Enterprises) for William Lieblein, located on Route 25 (Main Road), Southold, New York. AUTHORIZED NAME: DATE'. BY: HEAR WHAT OUR CUSTOMERS SAY ABOUT PORT OF EGYPT "A credit to the boating Industry...The price actually paid for the work performed WaS lower than the quoted price...Thls Is a reflection of PORT OF EGYPTS honesty and falmess...I have been fortunate to have purchased a quality boat from a first class dealership.' -- Richard L Russo, Rivervale, NJ, in a letter to Eddie Smith, President of Grad~-White. "~Ve must compliment you and your staff for a thoroughly enjoyable experience In purchasing, rigging and commls- slonlng the Sailfish ... ~/e feel we were treated fairly, honestly and that expert workmanship went Into the boat. ~l/e would not hesitate to recommend Port of Egypt and look fon~ard to seeing you this fall for winter storage and "1 am very pleased with the speed wlth which you sold (my) Aquasport and the price achleved...(~,Vhen) we are In the market for a new powerboat, PORT OF EGYPT will he at the vmy top of the preferred list of dealers to do business with." -- Leland S. Zaubler, Philadelphia, PA 'Thank you foryour prompt and efficient service. ~Ve think of you often as we frolic about beautiful (Block) Island, because If It were not for PORT OF EGYPT, we'd never have made Itl" -- Emily and ~ilson Langwotthy, New Rochelle, NY '%Vhat really Impressed us was the fact that we were treated Just as well In the purchase of a used boat as someone who bought a new boat." -- Patty and Ron Billings, ,~ndale, NJ "Boat dealers are usually the type of people that close and say goodbye. You have to he the excaptlon to the rulel... You're the hestl" -- George De~nis, Miller Place, LI., NY HO~/TO GET HERE From New York City/the Metropolitan area: Take the Long Island Expressway east to the end. exit #73. Then pick up Route 58 which becomes Route 25 Itbe Main Road) in Rivethead and continue east approximately 20 miles. The PORT OF EGYPT is located on Route 25 about one mi~e east of the center of Southold village on the way to Greenport Watch for the red PORT OF EGYPT sign. Frem Connecticut and New England: Take the Orient-New London Ferry to Orient Point at the end of Long Island's North Fork. Take Route 25 (the Main RoadJ approximately 12 miles to PORT OF EGYPT, located at the sign of the red circle between the villages of Greenport and Southold. PORT OF EGYPT IS IDEALLY LOCATED ON LONG ISLAND'S HISTORIC NORTH FORK ON SOUTHOLD BAY ~ Sheltered yet minutes away from open water, PORT OF EC~Y?T is within easy reach of the Peconics, Long Island Sound. Plum GUL The Race, Gardiners Bay, Shinnecock Inlet. East Hampton. Sag Harbor. Montauk and Block Island. A DELIGHTFUL VACATION SPOTI ~qlile you're on the North Fork, enjoy our beautiful beaches, fine r~staurants, bird sanctuaries, antique shops, country fairs and festivals, ~neyards, horseback riding, and exploring our delightful 300-year-old ~llages. Docking for 150 boats up to 35' long-in our new, single-loaded slips! Available to rent by the day, week, or season, there's a floating dock on each side of your boat allowing for easy maintenance as well as protection. Each slip has access to fresh water and electricity. Protected from wind and waves by a natural sand island, every berth is only minutes away from open water, within easy reach of the great fishing in the Peconic~, Plum Gut, The Race, Gardiners Bay, and Shinnecock Inlet as well as off East Hampton, Sag Harbor, and Montauk. Telephone: (S16) 765-2445. Double launching ramp for trailers · For a nominal fee, you can launch or haulyour boat at our ramp and be ~n or out of the water in secondsl ~(/hat could be easier? There's parking for your car and trailer. Gasoline and diesel fuel are also available. Included are rods and reels by Shakespeare, Daiwa, P~nn, Fenwick, and Shimano, to name only a few, plus custom built rods, made especially for Peconic fishing, by Hal Brown of Connecticut and available exclusively at PORT OF EGYPT. We carry a full supply of bait, fresh and frozen, at all times during the season (plus ice) -- and offer you honest fishing reports and helpful information. Telephone: 765-3918. Charter a boat for great fishing! Charter a boat with one of our Licensed Captains -- or make reservations on one of our open boats for bottom fishing· They leave PORT OF EGYPT at approximately 7 AM and return at about 4- PM, and specialize in catching flounder, fluke, weakfish, porgies, bluefish and blackfish in season. ~X/e can also arrange night tdps or moonlight sails. Telephone: 15161 765-3918. And, when you don't cat.c.h any yourself -- visit our fish market! You'll be delighted by the selection of fresh caught whole or filleted blackfish, bluefish, porgies, flounders, swordfish, salmon, shrimp, smoked fish, live lobsters plus tail or claw specials. Along with famous local recipes, sauces, and breadcrumbs. (Come at the right time -- and you can see the fish being unloaded at our docklI Telephone: 765-3200. VISIT THE TERNING MOTEL ON BEAUTIFUL SOUTHOLD BAY- OPEN ALL YEARI Your home away from home~ Each of our twenty-one units is a suite, with two separate sleeping areas and three double beds, air conditioning, and color TV. Or enjoyyour own efficiency apartmentl Park your car or dock your boat within steps of your room, swim at our local beaches, go fishing, enjoy four nearby restaurants, along with the museums and shops that have made Southold and breenport renowned resorts, land remember: ask ahout our money-saving, midweek specialsl~ Telephone: 1516) 765-5121. BUY "THE PERFECT GIFT" AT THE TERNING POINT Opened in 1982 by Kae LJeblein and Carolyn Cottral, this charming shop offers special nautical and handcrafted items that'll make your visit even more memorable. Plus a dazzling selection of gift items in brass, glass, and wood· Telephone: 1516~ 765-1830. ENJOY ARMANDO'S SEAFOOD BARGE -- RIGHT AT PORT OF EGYFT! Armando Cappa's famous restaurant has been an East End tradition for over 20 yearsl Its delectable cuisine has won three-and-a-half hats from Barbara Radar of Newsday, and praise from other food critics for such specialties as lobsters, clams, scallops and finfish as well as succulent steaks -- allserved up in style with a panoramic view of the PORT OF EGYPT marina and Southold Bay. Telephone: ($16~ 765-3010. Here's why PORT OF EGYPT Is unique: · Family-owned and operated for over 40 years In 1946, the LJeblein brothers -- Bill, Herman and Herb -- opened PORT OF EGYPT, a small fishing station on Southold I~. As the post-war boarirx:j I:x~om gained momentum, they began to increase the size of the boat rental fleet, and quickly expanded into a full-scale marina. Today, PORT OF EGYPT is a Long Island landmark -- nationally- acclaimed for the quality of its service -- and an award-winning marine operation that offers you the latest models of such prestige lines as GRADY- ¥(/HITE (1961)...PRIVATEER (1979)...IMPERIAL U984).._IOHNSON OUT- BOARDS (1952)...and CALKINS TRAILERS (1980). But that's not alii Over the years, we've added dockage for 130 boats, a "high and dry" facility -- the first on Long Island's North Fork; plus the Teming Point Motel, The Terning Point Gift Shop, Armando's Seafood Barge Restaurant and the Port of Egypt fishmarket. During this constant growth, the Liebleins' committment to profession- alism and personal service has remained unchanged. In fact, this year, PORT OF EGYPT has served over 15,000 satisfied customers from as far away as Florida. ~'hile Bill Sr. still takes an active role in PORT OF EGYPT managemenL his son -- Bill, Jr., assisted by his brother, Peter, his sister, Elisa Thomas, and his brother-in-law Ace Cott~al, now run the operation. From left to right, Bill, Kae, Bill Jr. and Karen I. ieblein, Ace and Carolyn Cottral, Capt. Bill L/eblein, Elisa Thomas, Lorretta, Peter and Coray LJeblein. · PORT OF EGYPT Is the oldest GRADY-~-IITE dealership on Long Island (and) the second oldest In the countG, I) As Eddie Smith, Jr., President of Grady-gVhite writes: '~/e especially enjoy watching a dealership grow, prosper and mature as we have been fortunate enough to with PORT OF EGYPT MARINE. Boat Sales PORT OF EGYPT Is an authorized dealer for GRADY-~VI-BTE... IMPERIAL... AND PRIVATEER. Visit usyear'round, and climb aboard the latest models of these top boating lines for fishing, cruising, and family fun --ranging in size from 16' -- 26', already rigged and ready to go. And, because of our on-the-water location, you can try out the boat of your dreams before you buy it! Through our large inventory and sales volume, we offer you an excellent selection at competitive prices -- plus seasonal sales and specialsl We help you arrange the best financing available. Therefore, when you're in the market, look over the latest models in our showroom AND our large selection of quality used boats -- available at affordable prices. And that's not alii PORT OF EGYPT Is also your center for JOHNSON OUT- BOARDS from 2 hp to 300 hp as well as for CALKINS BOAT TR~ILERS up to 10,000 lbs. Telephone: (516) 765-2445. Award-Winning offer you a FREE end-of-season survey to make sure your boat will start the season in top condition, ready for you to enjoy without interrup. tionl This attention to detail is just one reason our service department has been rated ~ by Johnson Outboards. The other reason? ~(/e "tune-up" our mechanics[ Our full-time technicians are professionals who continoa[ly undergo exhaustive factory training by Johnson, Evinrude, OMC, Volvo and MerCruiser. In addition, we furnish them with state-of-the-art tools and,d~-~Jnostic equipment. So whenever you have a problem -- we can solve itl But you don't have to wait until then to sample our expertise: we're specialists in custom rigging so you can be sure from the start your boat will reflect your needs and your taste! It's this confidence in our expertise that's made PORT OF EC~YPT a "household name" for over four decadesl Telephone: (516] 765-2445. Complete marine parts and accessories -- on the premises Don't wasteyour time shopping from store to store -- or be confused by a bevy of catalogsl Sal Loffredo, our in-house expert, will personally advise you on what's best for your boat -- and your budget -- and deliver it to you promptlyl Takeyour pick from our $150,000 plus inventoryof over 5000 parts and accessories from nuts and boits and paints to electronics and engine parts to everything you'll ever need to keep your boat ship- shape. Our pricing is competitive -- and we accept major credit cards. Telephone: (516~ 765-2445. APPEALS BOAR{) MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board o£Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 August 12, 1988 Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. CTM #1000-56-410.1, 11 & 13.2; 1000-56-6-3.2, 3.3, 4, 6.1 Dear Merl: Since there are two applications in the above matter, an additional filing-fee check ($150) is required. The variance application and special exception application, with $150 check and accompanying papers, will be held pending receipt of same. Yours very truly, GEP~RD P. GOEHRINGER ~Kowalski TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . _ ~lfolk Counly, Ne~- York 516- 76S-~80~ N? 27637 ~[c~wo 9~. J~di~h ~. lerry, l'own Cr~k~ JUDITH T. TERRY To: From: OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Dated: August 24, 1988 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 3771 application of Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. for a Special Exception. Also included is Notification to Adjacent Property Owners; Short Environmental Assessment Form; Certificate of Occupancy for Non-conforming Premises; survey of property; and any other attachments relative to this application. Judith T. Terry ~n Clerk ....... ~ . _ ~..~._..~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD* BTATir ROAD ~5 BOUTHOLD, L,.I,, N.Y. 11g'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 August 12, 1988 Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. CTM #1000-56-410.1, 11 & 13.2; 1000-56-6-3.2, 3.3, 4, 6.1 Dear Met1: Since there are two applications in the above matter, an additional filing-fee check ($150) is rec/uired. The variance application and special exception application, with $150 check and accompanying papers, will be held pending receipt of' Yours very truly, GE~.~E/) P. GOK~INGE~ STATE OF NEW YORK. ~OUNTY OF On the da! of 19 , ~fo~ ~r~mUy ~ to ~ ~a, w~, ~g ~y t~t ~ ~id~ at No. t~t ~ ~ t~ of., in ~d which ~ kn~s t~ ~1 of ~id ~ti~; that t~ of the ~ of di~n of ~id ~ti~, si~ h na~ t~ by like Oidet. · .~ BARGAIN AND:'SALE DI~q~ · WITH COVI~NANT AGAINST GRANTOR'$ ACI~ Trtt~ No. WILLIAN J. L[EBLEIN and,, HERMAN K.: LIEBLEIN · PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC.' i TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY rrATl~ OF NaW YORK, COUHTY OF ~"~ sa: - ~0TARY pUgLI~. State No 52.2162100 ~lrm ~xpi~es Ma~ch ~A~ ~ N~ YORK, ~U~ ~ t~ da~ o~ 19 , ~o~e ~.~ · ~- ' re--ia" imtm~t, ~ith whom t~ ~,b,n8 w,~ to that he knmes de~ in ~nd who executed the fote~olng.illstmment; il'mt ' he, snld sublctibing wimess, wu p .zes~n, t n. na s~w . _~__ execute the same; and that he,~#ld-wtme~, at me sa~ time subscribed h name ns witne~'thetetO.\X ~. 65600 -" · ,~ecz 0600 ' "~" -' mr 005000/006000 co~rrv t~ ~'o~-Suffolk:'' Recorded at Request o£ cOMMoNw£ALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY! -. Schwartz & Resh, P~C. 150 Broadway· New York, New York 10038 . Zip No. ?%00:, ?. THI~ INDENTURE, made the 20th day. of S.epte~nber , nineteen hun&ed amd seventy-eight BETWEEN WILLIAM J. LI,~.BL~N, 'u ' ' .. resi, ding at 125 Sterling ~treet, Village of Greenport, Town of ~6uthold, County of Suffolk and State of New York and HERMAN K. LIEBLEIN, residing at no number Hippedr~me Drive, Southold, Town of Soqthold, County of Suffolk an! State of New York. pat,y of the first part, and PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISE, INC. , a domes~c corporation having its principal place of business at no number Mai~ Road, Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of~%New York, . patty of the second part, WITNESSETH, d,at the patty of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuabh- consideration paid by the patty of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second l~$t, the heirs ot successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements therecm erected, mtuate, lying and heine in the Hamlet of Arshamomaque, Town of 8outhold, 'County of Suffolk and State of New York, hounded and described as'fifollows: BEGINNING at a monument on the southerly line of Old Mai~ Road at the northeasterly corner of land conveyed by the parties of the first part to the party of the second part by Deed l~ 19701 from said point of heginning running along said southerly line of Old Main Road, North 87 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East, 477.45 feet to a monument; thence along land of Becket, 'South 26 degrees, 47 minutes, 00 seconds East, 409.0'feet to ordinary high water mark of Budd's Pond; thence westerly to a poimt oat'said ordinary high water mark which is South 78 degrees, 03 m~'.nutes, 10 seconds West., 514.71 feet from the last described .i'~t; ~hence port along said land conveyed by the parties of the first p~rt} to the party of the second part, five courses: (1) North 12 de~rees, 38 minutes, 00 seconds West, 226.0 feet to a monument; tl~enee ~(2) North 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds East, 12.0 feet; thence (3) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 seconds West,~ 35.0 feet; thence (4) South 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds West, 12.0 feet; thence (5) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 aeeonds West, 22.0.58 feet to the point of BEGINNING. It is intended that this conveyance include all of the a~ea hetween the two side lines of the shove descrihed premia~s. This is a d~ed which corrects the description of the ahov~e parcel set forth ~fi a deed dated March 16, 1972 and recorded in ;Liber of Deeds 8467 at page 151. , TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the ~ of the first part in a~d to ~y streets and roads abutting the above desetihed premises to the c?ntec lines t .h?enf; 'I~OGETHER with the app~renanc~ and all the estate and tights of the party of the first part m and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second parc, the heirs or successors and assigns of th{_ party of the second part forever. AND the patty of the first part cdvenants that the patty of the first part has not done or suffered ~ny,~ing whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatevet exCept as aforesaid , AND the patty of the first part, n compliance with SectiOn 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the pa~ty of the first part will receive the consideration for thi, conveyance and will hold the tight to receive such coat{titration trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will a I the same tint t the payment of the cost of th~ imnrovement before us n- an ..... t .~..~ ~ .u_ ~_ · PP y_. o ..... l~.,,y aha. DC constrnen as it it read pattms" whenever the sense of this indenture s6'.k-qui~es. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the ~st imrt has duly executed this deed the dny and y~at first above written. IN PRI~SP. NcE OF: TI~N!S F-~R T~,X SO~PO, LK HERMAN K. LIEBLEIN ~ ~' March 2, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: This letter authorizes PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. to act in my behalf in making applications and securing necessary permits relative to the construction of a Boat Storage Building for an existing marina (Port of Egypt Enterprises) for William Lieblein, located on Route 25 (Main Road), Southold, New York. AUTHORIZED BY: AUG A 19U8 I TO~R~OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Sout old Town Clerk TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEN YORK: Application No. _~)) Date Filed: I (We), Peconic Associates, Inc. for Port of of Rte. 25 Egypt Enterprises, Inc. (Residence, House No. and Street) Southold, New York, li971 (516) 765-2445 (Hamlet, state, Zip Cod6, Telephone Number) hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE VIII , SECTION 100-80 , SUBSECTION for the below-described property for the following uses and purposes (and as shown on the attached plan drawn to scale): construction of an additional boat storage building (see attached plan) A. Statement of Ownership and Interest. Port of Egypt Enterprises~ Inc. property known and referred to as Rte. 25, Southold (House No., Street, is~av~cz) the owner~(3() of Hamle'~) identif~ ~n.~ Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 056 , Block4 & 6 , Lot(s) ~.2-§~6.1 , which is not ~176~ on a subdivision Map (Filed , "Map of "Filed Map No. and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on 1978 as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The above-described property was acquired by the owner on B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: continuation and expansion of existing boat the additional facility designed and placed existing. storage operation with in harmony with the C. The property which is the subject of this application is zoned C-Light Industrialand [X ] ~s cQnsis~¢nt with the use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith. L ] is not consistent with the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): [X] is vacant land. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ~(~~~ STATE OF NEW YORKi ss.: ?:. ~x~O~n a t u :e ~ ~/~ Sworn to before me this ~day of 9 ~ ~~ JOAN X JACOBS ZB2 (rev. 2/~/8f) ho~z ~ ~u~c, %,~ of ~ v~ QUEST[O,gNA[RE TO BE COHPLETED A~IO SUBHITTEg 14ITH YOUR APPLICATIOH FORHS TO THE [JOARD O-F-AP-PEALS Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Board of Appeals with your completed application forms. If "Yes" is answered to any questions below, please be sure to depict ~hese areas on your survey (or certified sketch), to scale, and submit other supporting documenta- tion. 1. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? : '*'' Yes 2.a.) Are there any areas which contain wetland grasses? (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by Town Code, Ch. 97 for your reference.) . Yes *b) Are there any areas open to a waterway without bulkhead? Yes 3. Are there existing structures at or below ground level, such as patios, foundations, etc? Yes 4. Are theFe any existing or proposed fences, concrete barriers, decks, etc? $.. If project is proposed for an accessory building or structure, is total height at more than 18 feet above average ground level? State total: ft. If project is proposed for principal building or structure, is total height at more than 35 feet above average ground l'-T~-l? State .total: 35' - ri~e~'ft. Are there other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? If ~es, please submit copy of deed. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel (or abutting land under your ownership,'if any)? State Permit # and Nature: Yes Yes Yes Yes 9. Do state ~vhether or not applications are pending concerning these premises before any other department or agency (State, Town, County, Village, etc.): P1 anning. Board annl icatinn~ are being submitted Town Board " - Town Tru'stees ~ODlications are beinq submitted County Health Department Village' Of Greenport N.Y.S.D.E.C. ~aDDlications are beinq submitted Other lO. Is premises pending a sale or conveyance? If yes, please submit copy of names or purchasers and conditions of sale.(from contract). ll. Is new construction proposed in the area of contours at 5 feet or less as exists? '- - 12~ If new construction is proposed in an area within 75 feet of wetland grasses, or land area at an eleva- tion of five feet or less above mean sea level, have you made application to the Town Trustees for an inspection for possible waiver or permit under the requirements of Ch'. 97 of the Tovzn Code? 13. Please list present use or operations ~onducted upon the subject prgperty, at this time marina? boat sales - storoqe and proposed ~ame *Please submit photographs for :he record. I certify that the above statements are true and are being submitted reliance by tho 8oard of ' ' ' application. g,)a~ure (Proper~y ~) Yes Yes Yes N~~ Yes '~ Yes .~ Yes FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTilOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTIIOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL ~.~..~..~.~..Z ..... ~..~...,,~..~. ~ ~,-~.~.. ~...~:. J J.,.~. ~. ....... I'I~EASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated . ~.~~.. ~ < ....... 19 ~ ~.. ,.o~,,~,,, ,o ~o,~,~,. ~..~ ~.~.~~:~ .......................... ...... ~.~.~, .... ~~..~ ....... County 'I'~x Map No. 1000 Section . .O ~. ...... Block .... o.~ ....... I,ot A.~..~.~..~Y.$, I Subdivi,,ion ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No .................. is returned herewith and dic, approvc,,I on the l~,llowing grot,mis. ~.~ .~.~. ~. 7.~ 9 Building Inspector 14-16-2 .(2/67) --,7c 617.2i AppendiX A State Environmental Quality Review~ I~ULL i~NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FoRM SEQR PUrpose: The full E,~F is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Attions Identify the Portions of EAF completed ior this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 CiPart 3 Upon review df the information recorded on this EAF (Partes 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact, s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. AlthoUgh the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will he prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid tot Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project SpOltlUr NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether [~e action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona, information VOU believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME O~ ACTION Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. LOCATION OF Ac'rlON (I~W41 8t~ ~ Mun~ell~lfly emi ~oufltyl Rte. 25t Southold, N.Y. NAMEOF APPLICANT~PON~R Peconic Assoc~atest Inc. 11971 I BUglNE~TELEPHONE - Merlon Within1 Pres. (516)477-OO30 ADO~W One Bootlem Ailev Cr~enport NAME OFOWNEW~/dlffMen~ Bill Lieblei~ - Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. A~RE~ Rte. 25 STATE { ZIP CODE N.Y. 11944 JBUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 765-2445 Southold STATE ZIP CODE N.Y. 11971 DE.RIP, ION OF ACT1ON errection of a 25,440 Sq. Ft. boat storage building Please CompiMe Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not APPlicable A.. Site Deeodptlon Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped 1. Present land use: r'lUrban C~lndustrial f-IForest I"lAgriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: 2.1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non*agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area - water Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. what is predominant soil type(s) on pro,ecL sitel Fd - a. Soil drainage: I-1Well drained % of site I'-]Poorly drained 80 ~& of site I-1Commercial I'lOther I-IResidentlal (suburban) Fill Land. f-IModerately well drained __ i-lRural (non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0 acres 0 0 acres acres 0 0 acres acres ~ 0 acres acres 0 · 1 acres .,1 acres O acres 0 acres · 0 acres 2.0 acres acres acres Dred?pd Mater~al 2 0 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System~ t; / A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370), 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site~ C]Yes a. What is depth to bedrocki' N/A (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [~O-10% 100 % I-I10-15% % 1-115% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? r-lYes ~]No 7. ~l~s project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [:]Yes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? -+ ~ ~ tin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I-lYes [~No 10. DO hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I-lYes I"~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? f-lYes [~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) C]Yes [~1o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? C]Yes X~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? r~¥es 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes DNo wa t e r a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? g'lyes i'-lNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I~Yes ~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? i-lyes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I-lYes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? r-lyes B. ProjeCt DeScription 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 7 a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 2.1 acres initially; 7 acres ultimately. c. Proiect acreage to remain undeveloped n o n e acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed O %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 1 65 ; proposed 64 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1.5 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensiohs (in feet) of largest proposed structure 45 ~ height; 1 20 ' width; 2 1 2 ' length. 240' j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare proiect will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i e rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will distt~rbed areas be reclaimed? [:]Yes I-INo a, If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? - b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-'JYes I-'lNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes I-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes ~]No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes [~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 6 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11, Will project requite relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). year, (including demolition). year. I-1No after project is complete 2 I-lYes i~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved~ I-lyes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. ,Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [:]Yes [:~b~lo Type 14, Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain OYes ~NO 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? []gYes [3No a. If yes, what is the amount per month ~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be usedl I~Yes · I"INo c. If yes, give name Southold Town Landfill-- ; location d. KqYes I-]No Sour_hold Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? I-lYes If Yes, explain ~3No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I-lyes IrINo a, If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ton/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? i-lyes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? :~3Yes .CINo If yes, indicatetype(s) el,~'rr'ical -- h,i ld~ng 1 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacit~ N / A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 300 gallons/day. (seasona 1 - Hay 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? 1:lYes ~No If Yes, explain ~lNo through October) 4 2S. AJ~proval~ Required: Type Submittal Date City. Town, Village Board []Yes I~No City, T...o_wr~. Village Planning Board LXIYes I-1No City, T_o_w._n Zoning Board []Yes [:]No City, County Health Department [:]Yes [~No Other Local Agencies [~Yes ~]No Other Regional Agencies i-lYes ~No State Agencies r~Yes l-INn Federal Agencies r-lyes I~No C. Zoning and Planning Information Southold Town Sputhold Town New York State D.E.C. I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? E~Yes []No if Yes, indicate decision required: []zoning amendment ~lzoning variance ~special use permit I-Isubdivision [~site plan Dnew/revision of master plan i-lresource manag&ment plan I-lother 2 What is the zoningclassification(s]of the site? C-Light Industrial 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Ree attached olan 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no change from present - C-Light Industrial 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if develol~d as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the 7 What proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? C~Yes []No are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/~ mile radius of proposed action? see land use map 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? [~Yes [:]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10, Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts;J' DYes ~lNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)~' [:]Yes a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [:]Yes [~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? i-lYes []No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any a.Jverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verllloatlon I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. · Pecontc Associates, Inc.. Apphcant/Sponsor i~e --- . - Date May 10, 1988 .,~~~C--'~- ~~._ __ Title Pr esi de n t Signature If the action is in the ~oastal Area, and you are~'a/~tate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 617.21 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This f0tm may be used to provide additional information relating to Question l I of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: e A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated lo public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places7 · State Parks? [] · The State Forest Preserve? N/A [] · NatiOnal Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? N/A [] · I';lational Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] natural features~ N/A · Fictional Park Service lands7 N/A [] · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] or Recreational7 N/A · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak7 N/A · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designatlon? N/A · A site, area, ieee, reservoir or highway designated as [] Project and Resource (in ~411es) O. V4 V4.V2 V2-3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] '~ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] scenic7 N/A · Municipal park, or designated open space'~ [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] [] · State~ flLq [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [], [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal7 (i.e., screened by summer, foliage, but visible during other []Yes IiX]No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible7 ~XiYes [-INo DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *:/,~ mile *! mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Fiat [] [] Hilly ,. [] [] /~ountalnous [] [] Other I--] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projeeta within: *Va mile [[]Yes []No '1 miles [~Yes F"] No '2 miles [~] Yes []No '3 miles [~]Yes I--INo * Distance from project site are provided for aulstan~e. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to obsewe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. COI~FEXT ?. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUEHCY / HolldaysJ Activity Dally Weekly Weekends E~.,a~onally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by. residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At workslte [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] 2 (~) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ':/Real Prol~erty Tax Service Agency ~'~ (D TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER.., ' STREET , VILLAGE, DIST. J SUB. LOT /~' ~-~'z ~_ ~ ~.~¢'~ S W ~PE OF BUILDING.=,. ':' "~ r / . MICS. Mkt. Value ~ND IMP. TOTAL DATE R~RKS AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value Ac re Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland ' FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowland DEPTH House Plot ~ BULKHEAD Total DOCK COLOR TRIM Extension Extension Extension Por Porch Patio O.B. Total i I CF e,,¢ Bath , ': , j ,( Floors Interior Finish Heat Rooms Ist Floor Rooms 2nd Floor Driveway tDinette ' BR. FIN. B COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -32- August 16, 1979 Sho Center. The sign is larger than the permitted size, but the ~eels the sign can be designed in such a way that it ca~/ conform ~e present sign ordinance. The ~inds that strict application of the Ord~na uld not produce p ~1 ~ifficulties or unnecessary hardshlp;//the hard- ship created is lque and would not be shared by all/~properties alike in the [clnity of this property and in the same use district; and the change the characte~.~f the neighbor- hood and will not observe spirit of the ordinance. On motion by Mr. ~conded ~Mr. Tuthill, it was P~ESOLVED, that Lim-Con E~terp Hauppauge, New York, be DENIED the height requirements. Factory Avenue ~and Main north by Bethany Cemetel tion; south by Main~d Ardprop, Inc.~ _ Vote/the Board: an~. . . In-., 1455 Vets Highway, erect a sign that exceeds Loc of Northeast ~orner of ~attituck, Ne~ -b6unded on the-. :iation; east by Cemetery Associa- (State Road 25); west by Avenue and · nl~..D Ayes: Messrs: Douglass, Grigo oyen, PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal Iqo. Cappa and Ann Hocking, Main Road, 2575 - Upon application of Armando Southold, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, S~tion 100-81 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct an addition to an existing building with insufficient rear yard setback. Location of property: Old Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Old Main Road; east by Reiter; south by Budd's Pond; west by Port of Egypt Enterprises. The Acting Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, legal notice of hearing, affi- davit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and dis- approval from the Building Inspector. The Acting Chairman also read a letter from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Joan Reiter and Port of Egypt Enterprises. Fee paid $15.00. MR. DOUGLASS: They have a sketch here for us of the existing building and the proposed addition, and we also have a section of the County Tax Map showing the surrounding neighborhood. If you look at it it is deceiving. When we went out there it shows the proposed addition would be about equal in size to the existing building. This is misleadir because where the proposed addition will go it will replace part of the existing building there now. The part to be replaced is on a lower leve~ and floods now in a heavy rain. That part will be removed and rebuilt at the same time the addition is erected. All they are requiring is 15 feet instead of an area the size of the existing building. Is ther~ anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? Would you 1~ SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -33- August 16, 1979 to say anything, Ann? Bob. ANN HOCKING: No, I think the application states everything, MR. DOUGLASS: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? HELEN REITER: I would like to speak, but not really for or against it. I just want to air a couple of points on this. On this property there are two very active places of business plus a rental, and really there is hardly enough parking for one business much less two. This parking situation resuits in flooding over to our property for parking, as well as disabled boats and things. It causes bad relationships and expense for .us to remove. This is all I wanted to say. ..... MR: DOUGLASS:' -in~a situation like that, ~M'am, maybe you could get togetherlwith Ann and get some kind of barrier put'up. MRS. REITER: We have already spoken on this. MR. DOUGLASS: Maybe you could control that. We m~asured the area and the neighboring businesses are within 32 feet and less of their bulkheads, their structures are. The proposal that she desires would bring her only to 35 feet of the bulkhead and we would definitely make that a restriction that she could not go closer than the 35 2feet. There is certainly plenty of parking available if properly controlled. MRS. HOCKING: I don't know of any of my customers parking there. Helen, could it be from the Barge? MRS: REITER: No. MR. TUTHILL: MR. DOUGLASS: extension. This is not going to effect the'parking. What she is actually asking for is a 15 foot MRS. REITER: I have no objection to this, I just wanted to bring out some problems and the number of buildings. MR. DOUGLASS: This addition will not change the existing businesses~ It will be the same business, it is just going to improve the e~isting building she has there. 'Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak on this application? After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicants wish to construct an addition to an existing business building. Part of the present building will be removed and rebuilt at the time the addition is built. The other businesses along the water are all about the same setback from the bulkhead. The Boa.rd agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. ~ SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -34- August 16, 1979 The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of the property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood. On motion by Mr. Tuthill, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that Armando Cappa and Ann Hocking, Main Road, Southold, New York, be GRANTED permission to construct an addition to an existing building with insufficient rear yard setback. Location of property: Old Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Old Main Road; east by Reiter; south by Budd's Pond; west by Port of Egypt Enter- prises· upon the following conditions: (1) The proposed addition shall be no closer than 35 feet-to the bulkhead. (2) Approval of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Douglass, Grigonis, Doyen, and Tuthill. ~ PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2579 - Upon applicati~ Emanue~ · 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York F. Lark, Es( for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinanc~ V, ~00-50 B(3) & (4) and C(2), for permission erect a'28 unit ap ~lex with 21 motel units and a ~. Location of property: '.pyard Lane, East Marion, New Yol bounded on the north by Parkside hts Co.; east by Shipyard ; south by Gardiner's Bay; west by .de Heights Co. The Acting opened for a special exception the affidavit attesting to disapproval from the Bu read a letter from the Town had been made to: Parksid~ the ~ by reading the application Ordinance, legal notice of hearing, in the official newspapers, and The Acting Chairman also that notification by certified mail Fee paid $15.00. MR. DOUGLASS: Ti are lngs in this that will be desired and needed tc done, and the . ~it stands right now the Town of Southold desires/, agency status in t~ above matter. I would like to read the follo/~n~ letter into the record:~ Mr. Roy/L. Haje, Regulatory. Affairs, Buildih~ 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook./New_.Yor_k 11794 RE. TW 15278-0143, E~nuel Kontok.osta. Dear Mr. ~3~e: ~T~h~e~Town of Southold desires lead ageh~y status in the above .r. There are.several steps which the applic~qt must take to p.ro with this project. (1) Apply for and receive~proval of~ a su~ )n of the property. (2) Apply for and receive a~roval ~ OWNER /'"~ ' , :~ i KI:I: I , VILLAGE DIST.~ SUB. .L(~T )D FOR,;'~.R OWNER N E ACR . I ¥ I .. RES. SEAS. VL. ,~// FARM CONGA. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value ~.D IMP. TOTAL DATE R~ARKS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD Tillable , FRONTAGE ON WATER W°adland FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowla~J DEPTH House Plot BULKHEAD Tot'el COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I,??r SOgTH~O / ......... ..... ~:::,. ,~.;;:: .... I~:::..::,.:: ..,ooo o~ ~ OWNER RES. SEAS. J VL. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY 'i~'~ORD CARD STREET : i :-? ,,?~.~.: ~ /:.'. FARM VILLAGE W CB. MICS. Mkl SUB. LOT TYPE OF BUILDING Value LAND IMP. ~ u ~ AL DATE o 7,7a 0 oo / 3~ob REMARKS /.R(5 ? , : .-~ Plot FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE' ON ROAD DEPTH BULKHEAD /Zg/ Y '4 / ", ~oo~ 056 OWN OF SOUTHOLD PRO RECORD CARD ~/~, .~ STREET VILLAGE E S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. NEW ~00 AGE FARM IMP. NORMAL Acre Tillable VL. TOTAL ~ O0 ,x Woodland , Meadowland House Plot FARM COMM. CB. MlCS. Mkt. Value.~ ~/e~. DATE REMARKS / ,..~'/~..4.~_~ ' Total BUILDING CONDITION BELOW ABOVE Value Per Acre Value FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD DEPTH BULKHEAD DOCK 77 M. Patio go B. T~i'ql /7// Foundation Bosement Ext. Walls Fire Place Type Roof / Interior Finish Heat Rooms 1st Floor Driveway J Dinette jK. DR. BR. FIN. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPEKI'Y OWNER FORMER OWNER STREET N S VILLAGE E W RECORD CARD D~ST.I su..LOT TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. LAND . IMP. TOTAL ~¥'©0 FARM DATE COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value AGE NEW Tillable Woodland Meadowland House Plot Total BUILDING CONDITION NORMAL Acre B E LOW Value Per Ac re ABOVE Value FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD DEPTH BULKHEAD DOCK OWNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STREET FORMER OWNER N PROPERTY RECORD CARD E W No,,4 h" h~ RES. SEAS. VL ~',.~ FARM · LAND IMP. TOTAL COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value 5~ o DATE REMARKS AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Acre FARM [ Value Per Value Acre Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowland House Plot Total DEPTH BULKHEAD DOCK Southold Town Board of Appeals -22- May 28, 1986 Special Meeting PENDING DECISION: Appeal No. 3494: ~-~ -~ - z~j~.~ Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate marine fuel storage tank structures in this "C-Light" Industrial Zoning District with an insufficient setback from landward edge of tidal wet- land and from ordinary highwater mark, at 6230 Main Road, 'Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-56-6-3.2, 3.3, 4, 6, 6.1. Following deliberations, the board took the following action: WHEREAS, a publ'ic hearing was held and concluded on May l, 1986, in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC..: under Appeal No. 3494; and WHEREAS, the board familiar with the premises surrounding areas; and members have personally viewed and are in question, its present zoning, and the WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded and transcribed; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located in the "C-Light" Industrial Zoning District along the south side of the Main Road (State Road 25), in the Hamlet of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 56, Block 6, Lots 4, 6 (presently owned by Port of Egypt Enterprises). 2. The subject premises consists of a total area of 10.5± acres (including land under water) with 600± feet frontage (lot width). Premises adjoining this property on the westerly side is presently owned by C & L Realty, Inc. which was not made a part hereof. Existing are numerous buildings, all as shown on the site plan mapped April 19, 1985, amended May 29, 1985, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 3. By this application, appellant requests permission to locate two new fuel storage tanks within containment walls with an overall outside dimension of 24'10" by 16'6", more or less, Southold Town Board of Appeals -23-May 28, 1986 Special Meeting (Appeal No. 3494 PORT OF EGYPT, Variance decision, continued:) with a setback of four feet, more or less, from the edge of the wetlands, as depicted by the May 29, 1985 survey submitted with this application. 4. Article XI, Section lO0-119.2(B) of the Zoning Code requires all buildings and structures located on lots adjacent to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the ordinary highwater mark of such tidal water body, or not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the landward edge of the tidal wetland, whichever is greater. 5. It is the opinion of the board members that for the best protection of the public (customers, employees, etc.) using the subject premises for docking, boating, hauling, etc., it would be best if the fuel storage tanks were located in an area more distant from the marina and ingress and egress areas to the docks. It is also the opinion of the board that locating the tanks as requested will not be environmentally feasible. In considering this appeal, the board finds and determines that by locating the proposed fuel tanks with containment and fencing at a distance not closer than 65 feet from the edge of the shoreline (waters edge): (a) the variance will be the minimum necessary; (b) the circumstances are unique; (c) the practical difficulties are sufficient to warrant a granting of this variance; (d) there will be no substantial change in the character of the district; (e) the relief as granted is not substantial, being 14% of a variance from the requirements; (f) the circumstances are not shared by other properties generally existing in the neighborhood; (g) that in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors, the interests of justice will best be served by allowing the variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that a Variance for permission to locate accessory fuel storage tanks (two) within containment as shown.by building plan view dated 10-31-85, prepared by Peconic Associates, Inc., in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. under Appeal No. 3494, at a distance of not closer than 65 feet to the waters edge along shore line, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED 1986 Special Meeting decision, continut~''~') Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- May 28, (Appeal No. 3494 PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, Variance SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the structure in question be located not closer than 65 feet from the waters edge along shoreline; and 2. County Health Department approval; 3. Proper diking and cement walls, containment, to retain any leakage of fuels; 4. Proper fencing six-feet in height around structure for security reasons; 5. Signs to be placed on fencing identifying danger and requiring "no smoking", as per National Fire Protection Agency standards. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was duly adopted. to to trial Parcel PENDING DECISION: Application No. 3481: ( Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES for a Special Exception the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section TOO-80(B) for permission install/relocate marine fuel storage tanks in this "C-Light" Indus- Zoning District, at 6230 Main Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map No. 1000-56-6-3.2, 3.3, 4, 6, 6.1. Following deliberations, the board took the following action: WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on April 3, 1986 in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, under Application No. 3481; and INC. WHEREAS, the board familiar with the premises surrounding areas; and members have personally viewed and are in question, its present zoning, and the WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded and transcribed; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and Southold Town Board of Appeals -25- May 28, 1986-Special Meeting (Appeal No. 3481 - PORT OF EGYPT, Special Exception decision, continued:) WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located in the "C-Light" Industrial Zoning District along the south side of the Main Road (State Road 25), in the Hamlet of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 56, Block 6, Lots 4, 6 (presently owned by Port of Egypt Enterprises). 2. The subject premises consists of a total area of lO.5±.- acres (including land under water) with 600_+ feet frontage (lot width). Premises adjoining this property on the westerly side is presently owned by C & L Realty, Inc. which was not made a part hereof. Existing are numerous buildings, all as shown on the site plan mapped April 19, 1985, amended May 29, 1985, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 3. By this application, applicant requests a Special Excep- tion to permit the installation and location of two new fuel storage tanks within containment walls with an overall outside dimension of 24'10" by 16'6", more or less, with a setback of four feet, more or less, from the edge of the wetlands, as depicted by the May ~29, 1985 survey submitted with this application. 4. The newly proposed fuel tanks are to replace existing fuel storage tanks which are located at the easterly portion of the subject premises. 5. Article VIII, Section lO0-80(B), subsection (16) permits by Special Exception approval from this board the sale and storage of fuel in the "C-Light" Industrial Zoning Districts and subject to site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board in accord- ance with Article XIII of the Zoning Code. By action taken March 24, 1986, the Southold Town Planning Board referred the site plan to the Building Department for certification in accordance with Section 100-133(C). 6. It is noted for the record that simultaneously herewith action was taken by this Board under Appeal No. 3494 conditionally approving a Variance of Article XI, Section 100-119.2(B) of the Zoning Code for an insufficient setback of the subject structure to be located not closer than 65 feet from the waters edge along the shoreline of Budd's Pond. 7. It is the opinion of the board members that for the Southold Town Board of Appeals -26- May 28, 1986 Special Meeting (Appeal No. 3481 PORT OF EGYPT, Special Exception decision, continued:~i best protection of the public (customers, employees, etc.) using the subject premises for docking, boating, hauling, etc., it would be best if the fuel storage tanks were located in an area more distant from the marina and ingress and egress areas to the docks. It is also the opinion of the board that locating the tanks as requested will not be environmentally feasible. In considering this application, the board finds and determines that by locating the proposed fuel tanks with containment and fencing at a distance not closer than 65 feet from the edge of Budd's Pond shoreline (waters edge): (a) the use of same will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of prperties in adjacent use districts; (b) the use will not ad- versely affect the safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town; (c) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning. The board has also considered subsections [al through [1] of Article XII, Section 100-121(C)[2] of the Zoning Code. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that a Special Exception for permission to install and locate accessory fuel storage tanks (two) within containment as shown by building plan view dated 10-31-85, prepared by Peconic Associates, Inc., in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. under Application No. 3481, at a distance of not closer than 65 feet to the waters edge along Budd's Pond shore line, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the structure in question be located not closer than 65 feet from the waters edge along shoreline; and 2. County Health 3. Proper diking any leakage of fuels; Department approval; and cement walls, containment, to retain 4. Proper fencing six-feet in height around structure for security reasons; 5. Signs to be placed on fencing identifying danger and requiring "no smoking", as per National Fire Protection Agency Southold Town Board of Appeals -27- May 28, 1986 Special Meeting (Appl. No. 3481 - PORT OF EGYPT, Special Exception decision, continued:) standards. 6. Final site plan approval from Planning Board in accordance with Article and Article XIII. the Southold ToWn VIII, Section lO0-80(B) Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was duly adopted. PENDING DECISION: Appeal No. 3490: ~k~plication of HARRY AND SANDRA HURLBURT for a Var to the Zoning Orc~ance, Artic~I~e~l~r permiss~ to locate accessory st~age shed in the frontyard area. Location/6f Property: Private Road,Ushers Island, NY; bounded north by Wal~k~er, west by Spofford, south',~L~ Private Road, east by Private Roa~/and Sorenson; County Tax Map Parcel No~00-3-2-10. Following de l~rations, the board took t/~fe followin,g action: WHEREAS, a public',~hearing was held and ~ncluded on May 1, 1986 in the Matter of the Appli~Lion of HARRY A HURLBURT under Appeal No. 3490; and WHEREAS, the board familiar with the premises surrounding areas; and have y viewed and are in q present zoning, and the WHEREAS, at said hearing all who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony reco transcribed; and WHEREAS, the board has car ~ully red all testimony and documentation submitted concernin this appli n; and WHEREAS, the board made following findin'~,~ of fact: 1. The premises in qjestion is located along th~ northerly side of "Private Road," at F~shers Island, and is identif~d on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as~istrict 1000, Section 3, Block~2,, Lot 10. Bounded on the north is S~Walker, on the east, Sorenson, anl~,on the west M. Spoffard. J . ~ 2. The subjec premises consists of a total area of 1.8~ acres, and is a corne~ lot as defined by Section 100-13 of the ~ Zoning Code. Existing upon the premises is a single-family dwelling, constructed October 8, 1969 under Permit.#4497, which is shown in Southold Town Board of Appeals -37- July 31, 1986 Special Meeting PENDING DECISION: Appeal No. 3524: Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate marine fuel storage tank structures in this "C-Light" Indus- trial Zoning District with an insufficient setback from landward edge of tidal wetland and from ordinary highwater mark, at 6230 Main Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-56-6-4, 6, 6.1. Following deliberations, the board took the following action: WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 19, 1986, in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. under Appeal No. 3524; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard, and their testimony was recorded; and WHEREA~, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located in the "C-Light" Industrial Zoning District along the south side of the Main Road (State Road 25), in the Hamlet of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 56, Block 6, Lots 4, 6 (record owner: Port of Egypt Enterprises). 2. The subject premises consists of a total area of 10.5± acres (including land under water) with 600± feet frontage [lot width]. Premises adjoining this property on the westerly side is presently owned by C & L Realty, Inc. which was not made a part hereof. Existing are numerous buildings, all as shown on the site plan mapped April.19, 1985, amended May 29, 1985, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. locate overall 3. By this application, appellant requests permission to three fuel storage tanks within containment walls with an outside dimension of 24'10" by 16'6", more or less, as . Southold Town Board of Appeals -38- July 31, 1986 Special Meeting (Appeal No. 3524 - PORT OF EGYPT decision, continued:) shown on diagram dated October 31, 1985 prepared by Peconic Associates (A-l), with a setback of 13 feet from the edge of rip-rap along the water's edge at its closest point from the outside containment wall, and 23 feet to the first fuel tank, as amended. 4. Article XI, Section lO0-119.2(B) of the Zoning Code requires all buildings and structures located on lots adjacent to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the ordinary highwater mark of such tidal water body, or not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the landward edge of the tidal wetland, whichever is greater. Relocation and installation of fuel tanks are required by Article 12 of the Suffolk County Health Code, which limits the distances between the dispensing pumps and fuel tanks, etc., and must be installed in compliance with the provisions of the National~ Fire Protection Association (NFPA) regulations and Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations, 6 NYCRR. 5. It is noted for the record that actions have been taken under Applications No. 3494 and 3495 by this board con- cerning similar relief, as noted therein. 6. It is the opinion of the board members that it would be within the best interests and protection of the public, customers, employees, etc., if the fuel-storage tanks were located in area more distant than the area chosen, as further noted below. In considering this appeal, the board finds and deter- mines that by locating the proposed fuel tanks with containment enclosure and fencing at a distance, noted below: (a) the variance will be the minimum necessary; (b) the circumstances are unique; (c) the practical difficulties are sufficient to warrant a granting of this variance; (d) there will be no sub- stantial change in the character of the district; (e) the relief as granted is not substantial; (f) the circumstances are not shared by other properties generally existing in the neighborhood; (g) that in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors, the interests of justice will best be served by allowing the variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was Southold Town Board of Appeals -39- July 31, 1986 Special Meetin'g (Appeal No. 3524 PORT OF EGYPT decision, continued:) RESOLVED, that a Variance for permission to locate fuel storage tanks within containment walls as shown by building plan view dated 10-31-85, prepared by Peconic Associates, Inc., in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. under Appeal No. 3524, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AS CONDITIONALLY AND SPECIFICALLY NOTED BELOW: 1. Subject to all agency approvals, including the N.Y.S. Fire Code, Suffolk County Health Department regulations, N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation regulations, etc. 2. Concrete flash wall on water side must be the same height as tanks, or higher; on other three sides, minimum of four feet high; as well as 8-foot chainlink, slatted fence affixed into top of walls; 3. Top of fence (wall) facing water side must have barbed wire curl to prevent scaling of wall or fence; 4. Setbacks to be: (a) from existing stack-rack building 135 feet to west corner of tank and pump~ (b) 77 feet from southeast corner of existing one-story motel building at closest point; (c) 35 feet from southeast corner of loading ramp sump no closer than 25 feet to rip-rap; 5. Proper diking and cement walls containment to retain any leakage of fuels; 6. Signs to be placed on fencing identifying danger and requiring "no smoking" as per National Fire Protection Agency standards. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Douglass, Doyen and Sawicki. (Member Grigonis was absent.) This resolu- tion was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -40- July 31, 1986 Special Meeting PENDING DECISION: Appeal No. 3525: Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES for a Special Exception the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section lO0-80(B) for permission to install/relocate marine fuel storage tanks in this "C-Light" Industrial Zoning District, at 6230 Main Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-56-6-4, 6, 6.1. Following deliberations, the board took the following action: WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 19, 1986, in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. under Appeal No. 3525; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard, and their testimony was recorded; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located in the "C-Light" Industrial Zoning District along the south side of the Main Road (State Road 25), in the Hamlet of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 56, Block 6, Lots 4, 6 (record owner: Port of Egypt Enterprises). 2. The subject premises consists of a total area of 10.5± acres (including land under water) with 600± feet frontage [lot width]. Premises adjoining this property on the westerly side is presently owned by C & L Realty, Inc. which was not made a part hereof. Existing are numerous buildings, all as shown on the site plan mapped April 19, 1985, amended May 29, 1985, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 3. By this application, appellant requests a Special Excep- tion to permit the installation and relocation of three new fuel storage tanks within containment walls with an overall outside dimension of 24'10" by 16'6", more or less, as shown on diagram (A-l) dated October 31, 1985 prepared by Peconic Associates, with Southold Town Board of Appeals -41- July 31, (Port of Egypt, Appeal No. 3525-SE, decision, 1986 Special Meeting continued:) a setback of 13 feet from the edge of rip-rap along the water's edge at its closest point from the outside of containment wall, and 23 feet to the first fuel tank, as amended. 4. The newly proposed fuel tanks are to replace existing fuel storage tanks which are presently located at the easterly portion of the subject premises as required by Article 12 of the Suffolk County Health Code and in compliance with the Provisions of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) regulations, Tidal Wetland Land Use Regulations 6 NYCRR, N.Y.S. Fire Code, etc. 5. Article VIII, Section lO0-80(B), subsection (16) permits by Special Exception approval from this board the sale and storage of fuel in the "C-Light" Industrial Zoning Districts and subject to site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board in accord- ance with Article XIII of the Zoning Code. By action taken March 24, 1986, the Southold Town Planning Board referred the site plan to the Building Department for certification in accordance with Section 100-133(C). 6. It is noted for the record that actions have been taken under ApPlications No. 3494 and 3495 by this board con- cerning similar relief, as noted therein, and action taken simul- taneously herewith under Appeal No. 3524. 7. It is the opinion of the board members that it would be within the best interests and protection of the public, customers, employees, etc., if the fuel-storage tanks were located in area more distant than the area chosen, as further noted below. In considering this application, the board finds and deter- mines that by locating the proposed fuel tanks with containment enclosure and fencing at a distance, noted below: (a) the use of same will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of .adjacent propeties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (b) the use will not adversely affect the safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town; (c) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning. The Board has also considered subsections Ia] through [1] of Article XII, Section 100-121(C)[2] of the Zoning Code. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was Southold Town Board of Appeals-42- July 31, 1986 Special Meeting (Port of Egypt, Appeal No. 3525-SE, decision, continued:) RESOLVED, that a Special Exception for permission to install and locate accessory fuel storage tanks within containment walls as shown by building plan view dated 10-31-85, prepared by Peconic Associates, Inc., in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. under Application No. 3525, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AS CONDITIONALLY AND SPECIFICALLY NOTED BELOW: 1. Subject to all agency approvals, including the N.Y.S. Fire Code, Suffolk County Health Department regulations, N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation regulations, etc. 2. Concrete flash wall on water side must be the same height as tanks, or higher; on other three sides, minimum of four feet high; as well as 8-foot chainlink, slatted fence affixed into top of walls; 3. Top of fence (wall) facing water side must have barbed wire curl to prevent scaling of wall or fence; 4. Setbacks to be: (a) from existing stack-rack building 135 feet to west corner of tank and pump; (b) 77 feet from southeast corner of existing one-story motel building at closest point; (c) 35 feet from southeast corner of loading ramp sump no closer than 25 feet to rip-rap~ 5. Proper diking and cement walls containment to retain any leakage of fuels; 6. Signs to be placed on fencing identifying danger and requiring "no smoking" as per National Fire Protection Agency standards. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Douglass, Doyen and Sawicki. (Member Grigonis was absent.) This resolu- tion was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -43- July 31, 1986 Special Meet'ing ~ AMENDED APPLICATION PENDING: Appl. No. 35422 Special Exception of CLIFFSIDE ASSOCIATES by Richard Pellicane, Esq. in accordance with Article V, Section 100-50(B)[4] to construct 76 motel units in this M-1 Multiple Zoning District. Middle Road, C.R. 48, Greenport; 1000-45-1-1 and 2. Acreage: 7.002± This is an amended application, modified from Appeal No. 3349 which was initially a request for six multiple dwellings with eight units per building, total: 46 dwellings units, filed on 4-18-85. At a Regular Meeting of the ZBA held on May 2, 1985, a Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement was requested in accordance with a Positive SEQRA Declaration. Also requested in the interim was that an application be filed by the applicant with the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation (Section 661.5(b)[46] and that their reviews be coordinated accordingly. On May 21, 1985, Richard Pellicane asked for an update concerning this proposed multiple- dwelling complex, and a response was returned on May 22, 1985 indicating the above. On 10-17-85, the ZBA,(Planning Board, et al.) were served with a Summons and Complaint. Oh motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that the application under Appeal No. 3542 as Amended for CLIFFSIDE ASSOCIATES be ~nd hereby is deemed incomplete at this time pending receipt of the following: (a) N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation approval in accordance with Section 661.5(b); (b) Suffolk County Health Department approvals; (c) Planning Board preliminary approval or written input coordinating its comments under its reviews per Article XIII; (d) copy of Building Inspector's amended certification as required by Section 100-133(C); (e) copy of executed agreement or contract with the Village of Greenport concerning public water and/or public sewer; (f) affidavit certified by the applicant/property owners that the premises will be served by public water and public sewer utilities. It was further noted that the SEQRA process has not been finalized or further steps taken by the applicant concerning this property as of this date. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehrin~er, Do~gla~s, Doyen and Sawicki. (Member Grigonis was absent.~ This resolution was duly adopted. BOARD OF APPEALS. TOWN OF SOUTHOI, D In the Matter of the Petition of Port of Eqypt Enterprises. Inq. to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southotd TO: Armando Cappa Main Rd. Southold, N.Y. 11971 William Lieblein and Wife Central Avenue Greenport, N.Y. 11944 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER C & L Realty Main Road Southold, YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (~'l~)~O~ (Special Exception) (~llYe~jal(R~tvRl~X~,d~ [circle choice] N.Y. 11971 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adiacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: marina with sales; repair facilities and boat storage 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: C-Light Tndustria] 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will ~quest the following relief: special exceotion use of the property for a boat storaqe facility (marina) $. That th~ provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- si~ned are Article V I I I Sec~.~c~ 1 0 0 - 8 0 [ 1 Sectton 280-A, New York Town Law for approval of access over right(s)-of-wcy. 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 765-1809. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must he published at least five days prior to the date of such hearinl in the Suffolk Times and in the Lon~ Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the rtlht to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: May 10, 1988 Peconic Associates, Inc. Petitioner Owners ' Names :Port of E~ypt Fdfcerprises, Inc. Post Office Address Main Rd. Southold, N.Y. 11971 Tel. No. (516) 765-2445 [Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal to be attached for convenience purposes,] ATTACH CER~ . iED MAIL RECEIPTS ADDRESS P 740 401 796 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Street end No PO, State and ZIP Code Special Delivery Fee Restrtc~ed DeDvery Fee STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) P 740 401 794 ~CEIPT PO~ C~RTIFIED ~AmL NO INSU&ANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Senl t Street and NO P 0., State and ZIP Code z..o. Date, and~ldCr~ss of l~el,very TOTAL Posct~leCarld K.ees Pos,J~msr~o/Date- , ? 740 401 805 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERflAT~ONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Street and No to whom and Date Dehvered~ ? ~,~ TOTAL Postage and Fees ~_[/(~ Postmark or Dat~ M, erlon ,E. Wigm,Qin ,residinBat, Gr, eenport, New York , ...... , , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~a~ ~ day of. ~ ,19 ¢:~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side herfe~of, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the curren./t, assessment r_rjpll of the Town of $oufhold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- fice at ~_~--~v.'' ~'~.~,~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail· Sworn to_before me this ~) dayof ~Sr~ ~,~ ~L ,19 ~ JOAN A. JACOBS NOTARY PUBLIC, Stole ef New Yadl Ne. 4702900 ~u:6fiecl in Suffolk CcxJ~ly Com¢.ission Ex~ir~ Marc)n 30, 19 ~? (This side does not have to be completed on form transmitted to adjoining property owners.) d z. il' RO i'4 D . 650,0 LJ -I %, ~LOATt l-~CI 'l