Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-116.-6-24.1 OFFICE LOCATION: q SO(/ryO MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex �� 1p P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 # Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) CA Southold, NY 11971 Q Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 OUNT(, LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: March 28, 2012 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref. #6550 KIMOGENOR POINT, INC. SCTM#1000-116-6-24.1 KIMOGENOR POINT. INC. -#6550 - Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123 and Article XXII Section 280-116 and the Building Inspector's JanuarY 19 2012 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for demolition and construction of a new single family PP 9 P 9 Y dwelling at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, located at: 50 Jackson Street New Suffolk, NY. SCTM#1000-116-6-24.1 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consiste,icy Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is rry determination that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the below listed LWRP polices and therefore INCONSISTENT with the LWRP: Policy 1. 'Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development." Policy 4.1 "Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards." The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are recommended. specifically A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 3. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. Maintaining existing development and structures in hazard areas may be warranted for.- a. structures which functionally require a location on the coast or in coastal waters. d. sites where relocation of an existing structure is not practical 5. Manage development in floodplains outside of coastal hazard areas so as to reduce adverse environmental effects, minimize the need for future structural flood protection measures, or expansion of existing protection measures and to meet federal flood insurance program standards. The action is located in the VE Coastal Flood Zone -Velocity Hazard EI 8' are defined as areas with special flood hazards associated with high-velocity waters -generated by tidal surges and hurricane wave wash. Residential structures located within these areas have the potential to suffer high loss and pose hazards to life and property during high wind and surge storm events. The residential structure does not functionally require a location on the coast and is not water dependent. Although due to lot size, configuration and area of unbuildable lands located on the parcel the relocation of the residential structure is not feasible. However, the expansion of an existing structure by 23.5% is inconsistent with Policies 1 and 4.1. —the area is subject to potential storm surge and/or flooding. In the event that the action is approved to further Policies 5 and 6 the following is recommended: Require that the action fully complies with Chapter 236 ""Stormwater, Grading and Drainage Control Law." Note that the bottom of the proposed drvwells would be in groundwater based upon location grade and water elevations per the test hole. This is not permitted. Note also that the grade change to accommodate the new sanitary system (new elevation 6.5') could affect the property to the east and should be further evaluated for storm water controls. In the event that the action is approved, it is recommended that a Storm Water Control Plan is required. It is further recommended that herbicide and fertilizer restrictions are applied to the area. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Jennifer Andaloro, Assistant Town Attorney MTI 2 Office Location: QF $Oujyolo Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) * P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Southold, NY 1 197 1-0959 ���OOUNf`i,Nc� http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax(631) 765-9064 February 13, 2012 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office FEB 1 3 2012 Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. # 6550 Kimogenor Point, Inc. 1000-116-6-24.1 Dear Mark: We have received an application for demolition and construction of a new single family dwelling. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very tru yours, Lesli eisman Cha' er4 By: Encls. _ U pNE MATCH _________ LINE 6y»� FOR PCL.NO. ® ?_ 3EE SEC.NO. . vn' I Kt wl o erica/ Pi-" �%5�" i mat (I US TUM I I/ I K � I -+ - Ifs- t 41 i my �_ 12' 6 wo 26 s \ ' 3 SOA() q 16 v m / 2S2 r 30A4-) 9 "ze nid� An 119 s-21 CAS E O tl0 E RD. (4Mz A 8 U2 t2 A 16.1 22.3 \ 3 NTHOLD _ _ I by .� m ue w w m na u m r AVE m v1 v w • 8.9A(d 1e a\ 16.1 9 10.1 10.2 11 12 13 a '® S.OA(c)$ 3.41 IANC) 1.1A(c) 11A(c) 1v0 1.SA(c) 21< .� a t,A(c 16 1 TA(c) 15 L\ 6 N 193 �\ O 1 1N e z� o _. a ne > \... m 1.1A(c v' U Po TpWN OF.SOUTHOL � � PECONIC SEE SEC.NO.tae y 0V '\ P� 80 Sw(<) j neeA a s('�, Nze,� NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K TOMI6f soun,an SECTION NO Real Proper ty Tax Service Agency sawcow.rvr..rsis v p<R6�6aNN <N1PN�„� _.,......_ ,. a 116 --� e�Fmwsmm �^A'am..wvemua.Nr1,961 M ”' Y_ oanm masot $ 1 m I50 tnlaot x le .� 1 2 3 4 OB 22 Dt _ 2-1002 I� 9 01-m U/S Nl"ILL RD. iB _ 4.1 202 4 lla Y 2 d a $k 12a 13w PA FOR PGL NO PINY) 1 14 11B03d01 _ 16 46 173 1. 23 1 1�9 1 'OEOfIGE a63&el RD. 16 1)S 10.4) f 3 - I03 4 1B � 15 L4NY7 t Y a Wo 5 11_ 1.5gk1 a 16S + a a m F 3Nc1 16 12 t Q B w m W 21 + I] it Y IL a 9 to 'v 55 § 7• BNwvwtm § FIBBER 1m ]1 2 3 16Nc1 1 � 15q(Y) § a m 13.r1 Y a ' §112 to g 9 13.2 s 12 11.1 ' ^ l59') T KOURO'S RD. 20.2 C O 9 '193 19t 3 Z 2]Plcl f N.1 O § © § a21 w ¢ 16J w 9�] 163 c 26 Y 113 y 16.4 11P t5 PVE. NEW SUFFIXR a B 11 3 01 5.1 §] 25.1 9NY) 3 5.2 6 34CIt5ON 13 41 LM(c) 3,1N.) 1.5d)c _ 5 6 > 8 9d B2 2U(c) EON.) 1S § 3e 4, c l.lyc) I a GREAT s N — O 01-24-12; 15:05 7346401 # 1' FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: January 19, 2012 To: 'Thom Samuels for 25235 Main Rd. Cutchogue,NY 11935 Please take notice that your application dated January 11, 2012 For demolition& construction of anew single fatally dwelling at Location of property- 50 Jackson St.,New Suffolk,NY County Tax Map No. 1000–Section 116 Block 6 Lot 24.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this non-conforming lot, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIiI Section 280-123 which states: "A nonconformin bg uilding containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged. reconstructed or structurally altered or moved, exce�t as set forth below, unless the use of such building is changed to a confbrming u,"." The existing seasonal dwelling is a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use. In addition the proposed dwelling is not permitted pursuant to Article XX1I Section 280- 116 which states: "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, — and which are adiacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead.". The survey indicates a proposed dwelling setback ofapprox. 57.4' from the bulkhead. Authorized Signature Fee: $ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THESOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS ALS House No. Ltreet ACK Q( �T Hamlet fFll QKOL /SCTM 1000 Section-0-Block_0_LLot(s) d c 0-40 �Lot Size b C Zone K-4 0 I (WE),APPE,AL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUIELDIN13 INSPECTOR DATED I BASED ONnSURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED - ' Applicant(s)/Owner(s): kI M,r�O � NDR T 01h)Tl INC. 3/0 Mailing Address: D(LLC�I Q+M 99 C-(aU MEADOW L.A. ftotwyci I o743 Telephone: 6U -7351 351 Fax: Email: WAPC4E1Z 149 () cold NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: e Name of Representative: 6 0 SAMA SLS for 4owner( )Other: Address: 152 MAIN POAD CuTcI o&UE na{ �(1I Telephone: 73 6405 Fax: O Emai1:TD(}��pAouPSyi�mut cold Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( ) Applicant/Owner(s), (y Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUH DING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED JI - �G- I I and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED I -I I I a FOR: ("uilding Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy O Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: I�I Section: ago - 195 Subsection: Type of Appeal- ppeal, An Appeal is made for: lY)A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other ® AFMC[6; XXII SualON ; a -Il A prior appeal ( has, ( ) has not been made at any time with respect to this property UNDER AppealNo(s). 5654 Year(s). 10 05 (Please besoaeto research before completing this question or call our officefor assistance) t PART B: REASONS FOR APPEAL 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood fo a detriment to nearby properties if granted. The Kimogenor Point property consists of three separate parcels, two of them contiguous. The underlying land is held by the Kimogenor Point Corporation with each homeowner owning a proportionate share of stock in the corporation. The subject parcel which containsthe residenceto be reconstructed is 5.9 acreswith six individual singlefamily residences and a shared clubhouse. The original development of Kimogenor Point occurred in 1915, and over time the homes have been expanded, improved and renovated. The subject residence is owned by Dan and Jackie Bingham, and it needs substantial reconstruction. It has not been substantially changed in over fifty years, making it effectively original. It has suffered from time and weather. Itis located in a flood zone,and the first floor is below the required minimum elevation, built on a locust postfoundation. The framing is non-conforming relative to current NYS building code and modern building practice. It is unheated,which is also non-conforming to code. The Binghams want a house which conforms to current code and practice, including hurricane resistance for framing and windows, proper heating, cooling, electric, plumbing and insulation. The waterfront property is extremely valuable,and warrants an up to date house. The reconstruction of the house is in keeping with the style, scale and detail of the existing houses in the community, and will not produce a change to the character of the neighborhood. It will be an asset to the common owners of the a Kimogenor Point Corporation. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The property is unique because it contains multiple single family residences on a single lot. Both the ownership structure and development predate zoning. The improvements are in the best interest of the community because current construction standards will be applied. The proposed reconstruction is located entirely within the existing footprint of the house, plus modest expansions are proposed to square-off that footprint. Much of this increase in footprint is in the form of an open porch. The modest enlargement of enclosed, conditioned space is necessary to accommodate a family of two parents and three young children, plus occasional guests. The existing setback to the bulkhead is non-conforming, as are four of the remaining five houses and the clubhouse,some of which encroach significantly more than is proposed. Furthermore,the houses align on the water side,with the covered porches forming a direct line,facilitating community awareness. This fact makes is unfeasible to push the house closerto the Bay. The closest proposed encroachments occur at the location of open, unenclosed porches. Even with the enlargements,the proposed house will align with neighboring houses on the road/bulkhead side. 3. The amount of relief requested is notsubstantial. The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. The house will be reconstructed within the existing footprint,with modest and appropriate expansions intended to square off the irregular shape and rationalize the interior layouts. The existing and proposed dwelling is set back from the property lines and from other residences on adjoining property parcels. The Kimogenor Point development is a private community, isolated from all other homes in New Suffolk. The land is an enclave unto itself. 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhoodordistrict. The property is suitably set back from water bodies,especially on the un-bulkheaded, beach side. It is mostly within the existing footprint. In keeping with requirements of the Southold Trustees, State DEC and County Health Department, it will include conforming sanitary and storm water runoff systems. 5. The alleged difficulty has notbeen self-created. The property and house pre-date zoning. The Southold Town Zoning Ordinance does not address this common development plan. Regarding the bulkhead setback, the existing house is non- conforming; any re-construction would be the same. There are no Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land. Priorto construction,the project must also be approved by the NYSDEC, SCDHS, and the Board of the Kimongenor Point Corporation. A permit from the Southold Trustees has already been approved. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The variance requested is the minimum relief practicable given the personal benefits anticipated bythe applicant. The reconstruction is needed to maintain the investment and the proposed expansion is modest in scope and scale. We respectfully request that the appeal be granted, together with any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable. Tho as C. Samuels, Authorized Agent Sworn to before me this y day of_62,�N(I)OA 2012. Notary Public APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION / (For ZBA Reference) k- I M Applicant: O & A OQ �Z(N T, INC./N C• Date Prepared: I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: MO 6 SpF�A�SOiVAL ?CSIgGNL� W/o 1ASENT� 1i U. SQ ET rODT P211JT SQ/ ©PEN rV�H W1 ST-AtkS Tv &-PAD {cM� 56j FT. TOTAi l��^� 179to S4• FT. U. New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: DGOEI.I.!hi - 72 .4 S4. Ft, Fo PC H - 5 S Sq. ET. APPM ON A L Dimensions of new second floor: EnkSfIN� ^ 7(07 Sp ( P¢ *txC&D -'IZoI SQ F' - y3`460�.1•t. *pj),Tlcn Dimensions of floor above second level: 6 Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): ,a7 i_ $ Is basement or lowest floor area being constricted? If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: tal_ f T-FOOMT r 3.0 F r - III. Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary)- Please describe building areas: q Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: 1 jb q I S,' F'(- TW 0 STOI2q 3FASDNU L, FAME REESPEWCA5 WO EA867416NT wa t (oG4 Sca Pt- CoYEus;D Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: M&)S1TW4-(CT G AS a FT rwo Sl-po CCNDMV11)cD FSM£ O-MCE 1wZc) 9A5EM@jjT, w- 666 96 F7 60VQ&� IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surve or): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: f � 050 5 Q. fiT Proposed increase of building coverage: Square footage of your lot: 2 ti70 OC4 5c:?. I-T Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: V. Purpose of New Construction: M0 PC rLACC' AIS EKISTIN 6 1;ASoNA �FS(DFa1Gc t� ti)c-ct� CONomoN9�? �r�coi Vcc Ivti�ctE ME�TC cr�� fz�cutP�MENT� rales FLOOD }1u121aCANE; LsAMMA" AND UP-P-EM-1SrAN -MP-<. VI. Please describe the land contours (flat,slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): PLAT AU Lou) Ly-ik 6- Please submit seven(7) photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 6s� QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premisgs listed on the real estate market for sale? _Yes No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No _/Yes,please explain on attached sheet. MI((j(.940,t{ S t C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? 4 E 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? KffS 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? l4ES SON Alf 5(pE 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? ✓ Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees:_ P pyx IT CrP,+4N1fED and if issued,please attach copies of permit with con itions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?-92N E Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises?J} 17_If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. if any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them of to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? 4 ES If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. AB UI T'I/i G- H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel P_E&D5MTJ f}L-5(NGL.E 1=A lu j rrand the proposed use '5'AAf=- w I (H (ZC(t��U S��U GTP J�6t O tWC S (ex:existing single family,proposed:same with garage.pool or other) d � Authorize signature and Date y James F.King, President QF so Town Hall Annex '" so �� •"1 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 1 �0yO�O 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer cn .ac Michael J. Domino c YO Telephone (631) 765-1892 o� COU Fax(631) 765-6641 y BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 18, 2012 Mr. Tom Samuels Samuels & Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: DANIEL & JACKIE BINGHAM 50 JACKSON STREET, NEW SUFFOLK SCTM# 116-6-24.1 Dear Mr. Samuels: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Samuels & Steelman Architects on behalf of DANIEL & JACKIE BINGHAM applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated December 21, 2011, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the application be found Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on January 18, 2012, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, z J WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees have found the application to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of DANIEL & JACKIE BINGHAM to reconstruct the existing dwelling with a new addition and new septic system; with the condition that the most seaward proposed drywell be relocated outside Trustee jurisdiction; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Samuels & Steelman Architects, last dated December 21, 2011, and stamped approved on January 18, 2012. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $100.00 Very truly yours, o� J es F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/eac S A M U E L S & S T E E L M A N February 9, 2012 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BINGHAM RESIDENCE Kimogenor Point, New Suffolk, NY SCTM#1000-116-6-24.1 Dear Sir/Madam, Enclosed please find materials required for an APPEAL for an area variance. Please find the following: 1. ZBA Application 2. Reasons for Appeal 3. Notice of Disapproval (1/19/12) 4. Applicant's Project Description 5. Questionaire 6. Property Record Cards 7. Finding of previous Appeal (3/10/05) 8. Short EAF Form 9. Owner's Authorization 10. Transactional Disclosure Form 11. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 12. Seven (7) Photos 13. Southold Trustees Permit#7712 (1/18/12) 14. Current Survey 15. Site Plan (2 sheets) 16. Floor Plans and Building Elevations 17. Check for $1000. Please get back to me if further materials are required. If the application is deemed complete, please notify me of the date of the hearing. Thank you, *WU Samuels ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935 (631)734-6405 FAX(631)734-6407 Ui 70 . Y t Ili -2 STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT FORMER O ER N E ACREAGE S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. VL. FARM comm. IND. CB. MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS r Les I{ AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEWFNORMAI+BELO W ABOVE FarmAcrePer Acre T Value Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable 3 Woodland Swampland Brushla6 House Plat: o Tota l .■.■■■■■.■■■I Jr- - ■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■fl■� ■■■■■■■■■BILI.■■■■�■■■ 116.-&24.1 clubhouse 12/10 ■■■■■■■■■■rr■.fir■■■ ..... ........-LL ■kA. Bldg. .. - - . Foundation Extension ® Basement ® .. ■ Extension Ext. Walls Interior Finish Extension ® Fire Place ®� BreezewayPorch Attic Porch Rooms Ist Floor Garage Driveway "1990 WIU � � aulu STREET VILLAGE L ^ '' 01STRICt SUB. LOT FORMER NER N E ACREAGE _ `S W TYPE OF BUILDING y. RES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. IND. CB. MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable 3 Woodland Swampland Brushland _ t House Plot Total \ ■■■■■■■lal�� �■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ZJ®�■;��'!■f\�Rill■■■■ Lf ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Bldg.M. ;�s Floors Extension X ? 91 Basement Extension .�f �3Interior FinishExt. Walls Extension Fire Place Heat Al" �® Porch ��■ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD `PROPERTY RECO RD CARD .� OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT FORMER OWNER N E ACR. S W TYPE OF BUILDING SEAS. Vl.. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS .f OQ ilk" FRONTAGE ON WATER Faodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD eadaWlafd DEPTH xe Plnt BULKHEAD �tol f ,-f ,d .. /Ir 133W S 213 NMO I�, � COLOR yV j fe TRIM i ' 1 � z X ZY i M. Bldg. Extension Extension 1,rx /S4 63d f fAl".s7i8 Extension j/ X 2 = 2- X CnJro X .T = Foundation �`� Bath 7,Wa Dinette S'2 X 7 Basement Floors K. Porch Ext. Walls Interior Finish J AILR. Breezeway Fire Place Heat1,46�? OMPR. Garage Type Roof Rooms 1st Floor BR. Patio Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B O. B. q q Dormer Driveway TQfal 0 I { TOWN OF -SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD jER STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. T„ FORMER 0 NER N E ACR S W Z70E OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. VL. FARM comm. IN CB. MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value Tillable I Tillable 2 Tillable 3 Wcodland Swampland Brushland - House Plot Total dist` •.cs '! ,. '; Al MONOMER 2A ■■■.iie�iaaieii�i�i■ .. ■■.Fim■■■■■■illI■■■�■■ ■em11■6mmommoll 7■■ ■■ W■■E■■■■■M■■II■■■■■■ ■■■.■■■■B►■■II■■■■■■ mmoommolimmum REMMEMEMOMME Driveway •.. . .. mw 7Tj v TOWN -.OF . SOUTHOLD A OPERTY . RECORD CARD `E "'Eli STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT FORMER OVeR N E ACREAGE S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. VL. FARM comm. IND. CB. MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS _ Z19- AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Farm Acre _ Value Per Acre Value Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable, 3 Woodland r Swampland Brush lonc -� House Plot Total \ R- max. . M■■■■■■■■■■■■ �° ■0111■Il■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ice ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ FoundationBath ' ' Floors asement • � ►7�� Ext:\Walls jl".t/ Interior Finish -0 Pe r Fire Place Heat� 7 — jJFZ S- Porch Rooms Ist Floor3reezeway Patio Rooms 2nd Floor • ••- / Driveway ® ®� OWN OFSOUTHOLD IXOPERTY RECORD CAkD . . OWNER STREET' VILLAGE " DISTRICT I SUB. LOT FORMER NER N E ACREAGE S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. VL FARM comm. IND. CB. MISC. LAND IM/P.�{ TOTAL DATE REMARKS AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE y Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable. 3 - � — -- --_ -- — Woodland Swampland Brushlandl'' _— House Plot Total .li . f ■■■■■■■-■-''■L I■■■■■■■■■■ ■.■:�■■■■■■■■■m�1,■■■■ ■��■■■�■■■■■■tit■■■■■■� ■ti■i■r■■■■■■1!■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ M. Bldg. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ . / � ulFoundation Bath :xtension 4 Basement Floors -xtension�xtension Fire Place Hecht 14 ■, I , Ext. Walls (I Interior Finish �� ® Porch. Rooms lst Floor 3reezeway Patio Rooms 2nd Floor Sorage —� Driveway � a OWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARDf ' OWNER I STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT FORMER OWNER N E ACREAGE S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. VL. FARM comm. IND. CB. MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS / ,. AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE 1,9 -7 Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value Tillable i Tillable 2 Tillable 3 Woodland Swampland Brushlond „ House Plot Total r , ■■■■■■■■■■yid■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ Foundation Bath M. Bldg. Extension -tKK 3k 40- Extension Basement Floors WalExt. Walls Interior Finish Extension ®� - Place • - - Liq Porch Attic er Porch Rooms Ist Floor Breezeway Patio Rooms 2nd Floor Garage DrivewayMOMM ... 4 l�'�w� � W��hc LVI.✓, ------------ -------------- A. Bldg. Foundation I Bath _xtension Basement Floors :xtension Ext. Walls Interior Finish xtension Fire Place Heat Porch Attic Porch Rooms lst Floor 3reezeway Patio Rooms 2nd Floor 3arage Driveway �. B. LAY` P ..- xmr COLOR dk 3 i 5 TRIM L A t I � � z ist 2nd M. Bldg. — Foundation C6 Fin. B. Bath �1� Dinette FULL COMBO Extension Basement CRAWL PARTIAL Floors Kit. _ SLAB Extension Ext. Walls Interior Finish L,R, Extension Fire Place �� Heat D.R. Patio Woodstove BR. Porch Dormer Baths �yy Deck Dock Fam. Rm. ✓ A.C. Garage 0.B. Pool lip_ � � (o—�_a�{•� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT RtC. K Kim =Lor �o�nt Co. JQcK56r St - Nf,. Suffol< 15 ACR. S 90 REMARKS TYPE OF BLD. 4 1d Si BE* S) S demo consfrUcivue-limal PROP. CLASS2-(o CJ LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE lS�jbU 27( U �l �j5��11 VL,,' FRONTAGE ON WATER TILLABLE FRONTAGE ON ROAD WOODLAND DEPTH MEADOWLAND BULKHEAD HOUSE/LOT TOTAL . ._y 40 0 0 OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD 6WNER STREET 5c) VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT FORME OWNER N E AO A REAGE eVrr /Noah . S ,� W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. Z ti VL. FARM comm. IND. CB. � MISC. - LAND —IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS I O ^ M n { /4tooJ QO ,/j'ao ee c add, o pis lam` 811 YQ 3 3001 A-a ,t,A, _. /5 E(D 5 a o c BUI DI 1G co s,(/ J J G 3 .f1 NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE G Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value 8 �� Tillable 1 - --- – �— Tillable 2 /S/pd Tillable 3 Wcodland Sr // �/ d J ✓ Swa"-)Iand --- _ li'�Ups' /-J o ✓ S _ fj Brushland House Ploto ✓ 911ripq �k 4, cel _ '/E Tbtal rd//7/RCI b�° ✓ 9me✓a�. 0 v avr7uY+•SiJrw1 .w OWN OUTHOLD OPERTY RECORD CARD . " -'OWNED STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT FORMER O NER N E ACREAGE S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. VL. FARM comm. IND. CB. MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable 3 Wcodland Swampland Brushland House Plot Tota l ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■T■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ M. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Bldg. :. th Extension Basement Floors P/ IV Extension Ext. Walls Interior Finish Extension J--7) Fire Place Heat IV�2 7Y 1� Porch Attic Porch Rooms Ist Floor Breezeway �� Patio Rooms 2nd Floor APPEALS BOARD MEMBER 0F S0(/jy� Southold Town Hall Ruth D. Oliva. Chairwoman 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P. Goehringer * l�t Southold NY 11971-0959 Vincent Orlando co, Office Location: James Dinizio,Jr. • Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Michael A. SimonCf7�l� ' 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold. NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �.jShy\ Tel.(631)765-1809• Fax(631) 765-9064 pPR 2 2005 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION '(� MEETING OF MARCH 10, 2005 Sclu old To m Cle rk ZB Ref. 5654—WILLIAM ARCHER (Co-op Unit#9) and KIMOGENOR POINT COMPANY joined in by letter of 2/26/05) Property Location: 50 Jackson Street, New Suffolk; CTM 116-6-24.1. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's home is located on a 5.90 acre parcel. The land has been held since 1915 by the Kimogenor Point Corporation, with each homeowner owning a proportionate share of stock in the corporation. The parcel is improved with the applicant's 1-1/2 story, single-family residence, five other individual single-family dwellings, and a clubhouse. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's September 29, 2004 Notice of Disapproval, citing Sections 100-31A and 100-243A, in its denial of a building permit to construct a proposed second- story addition. The reasons stated by the Building Department are: (1) that there are multiple dwellings on this parcel, and (2) reconstruction of the existing dwelling is a nonconforming use. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 3, 2005 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant wishes to add a second-floor addition and to renovate the first floor of the existing dwelling, as shown on the elevation and floor plans dated 7/23104, and site plan prepared 11/3/03 by Samuels & Steelman, Architects. The use of the dwelling will remain as single- family, and therefore there will be no increase or change in the number (density) of single-family dwellings, confirmed by applicant to be 'six,' adjacent to contiguous property also owned by Kimogenor Point. The setback of this dwelling is noted as 70+- feet from the existing bulkhead along West Creek, and all other code provisions were noted by the Building Department to be in conformity with the code. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: Page 2—March 10,2005 • • ZB Ref. 5654—William Archer&Kimogenor Point Co. CTM ID: 116-6-24.1 1. Grant of the relief requested will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The building inspector indicates that the present dwelling is a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use, based on the fact that the 5.90 acre parcel contains multiple individual dwellings. The applicants home is one of six dwellings, owned by stockholders of the corporation, Kimogenor Point. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than a variance. 3. The variance granted herein is not substantial since there is no change in the use density and the number of dwelling units, although nonconforming on one parcel, will remain the same. 4. The difficulty has been self-created and is related to the multiple dwellings on a single parcel of land, which is nonconforming. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions with alterations, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Goehringer, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance, as applied for, as shown on the elevation and floor plans dated 7/23/04, and site plan prepared 11/3/03 by Samuels & Steelman, Architects. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, Goehringer, Dinizio, and Simon. This Resolution was duly adopted (5- Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 4/8 /05 Approved for Filing FORM NO. 3 �Q NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Samuels & Steelman A/C Archer i't' DATE: September 29, 2004 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Please take notice that your application dated July 20, 2004 For reconstruction of an existing dwelling at Location of property 50 Jackson Street, New Suffolk, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 116 Block 6 Lot 24.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The Proposed reconstruction, on this conforming 257,004 square foot parcel in the R-40 District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIV Section 100-243A which states; "A nonconforming building containing_a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered or moved, except as set forth below, unless the use of such building is changed to a conforming use., The building has a nonconforming use Rursuant to Article 100-31, A. Permitted uses. (1) One-family detached dwellings, not to exceed one dwelling on each lot. There are multiple dwellings on this parcel. Authoriz (igna e r' CC: file,Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. APPLICA'T'ION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APP_A_LS For Office Use Only 64 Lt./ , Fee: Slfwz Filed By:pnh un �Date Assign edlAssignment No. t C� Office Notes: a,� bq p,13 2004 ' s Parcel Location: House No. 50 Lizitredh Jackson Street Hamlet New Suffolk SCTM 1000 Section 116 Bloclt06 Lot(s) 24.1 Lot Size 5-9 ac Zone District R-40 ID (WE) WEAAPPEAL 04WRITTEN DETERMINATIONOFTHE QBUILDING INSPECTOR,/ DAT William Archer 1 Lb CLCD j9� t�� Applicant/Owner(s): Y �g�,• • o / / Mailing 29 Green Meadow Lane, Huntington NY 11743 Address: Telephone: NOTE: II appticnni isnot the owner,siateif appllcont Is owner's attorney,agent,architect,builder,coniract vendee,ale. Authorized Representative: Patricia C. Moore Esq: Address: 51020 Main Road, Southb&d NY 11971 Telephone: 765-4330 (fax 765-4643) Please specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names: D Applicant/Owner(s) Authorized Representative O Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 7/20/04 FOR: jli]Buiiding Permit D Certificate of Occupancy D Pre-Certificate of Occupancy D Change of Use D Permit for As-Built Construction D Other: Provision of the Zouing Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Sectiou, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article %XIV Section 100- 243A Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: M A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map, D A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. D Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section D Reversal or Other A prior appeal D has 0 has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. Year Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals re : William Archer Residence/ Kimogenor Point, Inc. Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3 (b) . The variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1 . No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. The Kimogenor Point property consists of three separate contiguous parcels . The underlying land is held by the Kimogenor Point Corporation with each homeowner owning a proportionate share of stock in the corporation. The subject parcel which contains the residence to be renovated is 5 . 9 acres with six individual single family residences and a clubhouse . The original development of Kimogenor Point occurred in 1915 and over time the homes were expanded, improved and renovated. The subject residence, Unit 9 on the original site plan, is owned by William Archer and the house needs to be renovated. The last date that this home was renovated was 25 years ago. The applicant wishes to add a second floor and renovate the first floor. New Windows and updated heating and electrical work is proposed. The waterfront property is extremely valuable and the house has suffered from time and weather. The renovation was approved by the Kimogenor Point Corporation Board of Directors, Robert Fox, President . The improvement of the existing homes will not produce a change to the character of the neighborhood and is an asset to the common owners of Kimogenor Point Corporation. 2 . The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance . The property is NOW unique because the property contains multiple single family residences . Both the ownership structure and development predate zoning. The improvements are in the best interest of the community because current construction standards will be applied. The proposed expansion is an area within the existing footprint . A second floor master bedroom is proposed. Also the house will be squared off on the north-west corner of the existing house. The proposed improvements are modest and in character with the architectural style of the surrounding homes. 3 . The area variance is not substantial The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. The house will be renovated within the existing foot print, except that a small corner of the house will be squared off . The dwelling is setback from the property lines and from other residences on the Kimolgenor Point property. The Kimogenor Point development is issolated from all other homes in Nassau Point. The land is an island onto itself . 4 . The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district . The property is suitably setback from the water bodies and is primarily within the existing footprint . 5 . The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The property and house predate zoning. The Southold Town Zoning ordinance does not address this common development plan. 6 . The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant . The renovation is needed to maintain the investment and the proposed expansion is modest in scale . We respectfully request that the appeal be granted, together with any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable. f!to 4 �1`O ✓moo.—¢�EJe..r Q� , o�'"-_t'6 5&sy O.EF PROJECT iD NUMBER 617'30 SEAR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 7 •PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 9.ARRH2AN'T/SPONSOR - 2.PROJECT NAME �oMStEMc�S—s�buu�i,S� Sr�t�}(� �?F.Cor�TJ�Uc�'tor� �F 3�IvtrHRM �(�� 3:PROJECT LOCATION: (� Municipality s o u--t I Imay ouO County 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addles and Road Intersections. Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map UIU(T4 7/ D JAO<0N ST, Nt-;W SU FPOL-K; A�,, ArPko) r 46D FT RE'400 1104106 BM PONT" S 16-N -- s� MRP, 6.IS PROPOSED ACTION: n Now nE%panslon. [Zl"Ificationialteration S.DESCRIBE PROJECT'BRIEFLY: DUMOUS'fl EYNSTINU MO.-STOP-q EWONAI � DWCEt 40 A8ANDoN 8A1V(`t,4-kLJ SLIST&N , WkTFQcT NEW T4)0 - STorq FPAMS MIPENCE7 Wirtz CnUEFLEP 1'ot&H WITH 6Jb-W S;AwTAKl sgts`(em, 7.AMOUNT+�,OF rLAND AFFECTED: Initially 01 (J acres Ultimately i 5 acres 8.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? LJ Yes No If no,describe bde8y: ft(SP 6- M U LT(- GSDEN6c -PA0106r- tt( NsrKucrroN vurni(1i 7s PT ©F GUt,KFE/4p LAS N. c-MMNU) F9. T IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) Residential ❑Industrial nCommercial ❑Agriculture Park I Forast/Open Space Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY 'FROMM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AG (Federal, State Local) T-PAS `6 S DEC, sc- )�S . Yes �No If yes, list_agency name and Derma! approval: - / 11. S ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VAUD PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes El No If yes, list agency name and permit /approval: L.J Thu STE'E S t ASA RE OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? es No 1 CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponspr Nam Date: Z I t/I '7/ Signature (. If the action is a Costal Area,and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II- IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE 1 THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.47 If yes.coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes [-]No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN-6 NYCRR,-PART 617.6? it No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another Involved agency. Yes © No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED.WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers maybe handwritten,Illegible) Ci. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,notes levels,046"bafgb pattem,solid waste production or disposal, pokvo l for erosion,drainage ornooding lamp? Explain bdefly. OZ Aest he , ral. ogkal,histpk,.orosher rmtural orevl(yrdl resources;w wmmwlityor nelgM whopd:ehareeteR gbh bristly; C3. ahor una. she® or species,sigNmm�lbeliitats,or dhreatened or entlsrgere. Bplain C4.A communVs existlng plans or goals as 2MIly adopted,or a change in me or Intensity M um of land or other natural resources?Fxptairrbriefly. C6. Orvwth,subsequent dsvelopmenr,or reit activities 4kely o be Inducetl by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long tens,short term,cumulative,or otheroffecls not Idenbftd In C1-C67 Explain briefty: C7. Other Imp els(Includi chs sin use of ailhor. ua w of ens Ex Iain brief) :_ D_ WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA.(CEAL? If yes,explain briefly: Yes - FINo E. IS THERE,OR IS TH RE LIKELY TO BE CONTROVERSY ELATED TO POT ADVERSE ENVIRON AL IMPACTS? I M: E] Yes El No' PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be eomploted by Agency) -INSTRUCTIONS: Fa each adverseefect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,lenge,irnporfantor otherwise signficent Each effect should be assessed In connection with its(a)selling(l.e.urban or neral);(b)probability of occurring;(e)duration;(d)irreversibility:(e) geographic scope;and 4f)magnitude. If necessary.add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ri was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impacctofthe proposed action oother environmerdel c haracteristksoftheCEA. Check No box If you have Identified one ormore potentially large or signiflcantadverse Impacts which MAY occur.Then proceed dire sly to the FULL E4F and/or prepare a positive declaration Check this box I you have determined,based on the information and analyals above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actior WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, w attachments as necessary.the reasons supporting t hi determination. Name W Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officern Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible o r Daniel and Jackie Bingham 170 Oxford Blvd. Garden City, NY 11530 December 7, 2011 1 hereby authorize Thomas C. Samuels of Samuels and Steelman Architects or 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY, to apply for all required permits from the Town of Southold, Suffolk County and State of New York, for my project at 50 Jackson Street, Kimogener Point, New Suffolk, New York 11956 Sincerely, IL '*� &--,q Daniel Bingha *eim APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the Part of town officers and employees Theyurnose of this form is to orovide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: {{ 01 0 , �74M o£LJ (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) ` NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance _ Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approvalofplat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity. Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,manage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO V If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position ofthat person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicantlagentlrepresentative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); _C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of 60 2,Q6- (M 2-- Signature Print Name -Mj E VP-" C Form TS 1 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. if an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND I PROPOSED ACTION SCTMtt 1 - V& - of Tr The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. E Building Dept. L� Board of Trustees L 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital 0 construction, planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit,approval, license, certification: ®/ Nature and extent of action: eFcoNsrfdcr✓rloN or �lctsr� N ClA&LE Ft4/►111,� �EStDsI�G� � NEW T(4NtTT�ey StisTtM Location of action: �)o J�q('ksaN ST NEW 5(41 FOLK AlI / Site acreage: `J I(� Acx E S' Present land use: MU1.TWG& MIDGGE (Co—op) Present zoning classification: R - 40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided:: t �/ (a) Name of applicant: TCI(})O � AM/0� YO/NT //VC /D (b) Mailing address: a5 a X3!3 /1/(�}IN AMC) Ck-re f f O G U E (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 7,34 i9y G- (d) Application number, if any: Will the ��/action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes � No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? ,DEC, DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III–Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. dyes ❑ No ❑ (Not Applicable- please explain) t t t i rtt v t vii e os ion a,14 v ow Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III–Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 2/(Not Applicable–please explain) am vlo Wgforto or v tcAQ i-rit {�tt fbq ±ke prv Per{- `Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No D (Not Applicable—� please explain) We i fiE IS Lta e 'n Co <JrALe, a ol t1E' bH or, �i cfiUrYs Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria aYes Ea No Ea (Not Applicable—please explain) I r iK tev *- .o ayLd L01,11 be a�*KA ok si e clv S , Vint cA cfrttc 1& e i o cc kn rf? ' 1 o 5 6v1 S i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria EvYes D No 0 (Not Applicable—please explain) a wt a� Irt,i,wo is W LUIM � mteuvime. W C o u( S4tVt' 6 'IDHS i s r a w� 1 e uta t n eke Y iS geru ; Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. E Yes D No (Not Applicable—please explain) No deyeloern.ejA w"(( i(ke bice, t�A pot fi" ' ov 11a+yyzi l L-tid%aeuous Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III —Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. E�lyes E No D (Not Applicable—please explain) `f, ©levagpovettt will 40f acid PC hhFayits t� f-ke air All iru of 4 i el pnAa ,s a i t- o ( f t oti i clear e t Pne �esidevtr✓e rnmzcmvl i s -for peacholiutottNAem. s fr Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. �es ❑ No ❑ (Not Applicable—please explain) Me, eonsivuc iota a 5-e ¢ ici-e,"aa wite LtSe o VAVI 'S o a. eti r l work to v w i A Vd rdt 't ppy-oved iS cb HE ,s ctlnifzlyu S(A<+9-M PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Ye�O No❑ (Not Applicable—please explain) rthe Vi!610 0f- acce5�' alc tea cls fm4 1A); be- 12robertPs1 �tvtd lalit }-ht, course, 2 tC_U il5`IYUC' Ul . Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [_1No L4 "(Not Applicable—please explain) ( here, Glue. L1O comny-eV ialsOY LA&eS Oh 6ifC 14 j S-Fo i II ;S ro i 1 6 jr 6 eg a I YeSiclt?tnfiai tan use t � d will vH/u' Glell '0C Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. 14 'es ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable—please explain r0 ec fcc et rr S Emavivie. ce i scta AIMAIMV6o c bn " i-e 'goproveal Se t, rekKaweLls -Po r ' r Yvki Attach additionalh s eetsifnecessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable—please explain Th6 alb Vlo agricai-tvre, owis vo Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [:'Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable—please explain Con ioV1 WD s " iywat etpj2rov �eacwgdo r e u 4e • cs 'd oCO_ l e PeAC,Mi _MS r h r r and I (Ase. t' A/elu dr-yl! S 1AfL 1 lne zt lna r^'ef 'uG1'I oYI L�D�J P ' {ter btu J 6�M ❑h W VQ, 1,S �ti� fe �fi 2 � 1�12 �Ys t �ftECEIVED a ? 5 BOARD OFAPPEALS sIJ /t cpvrx /zv� 2� btc/�h-eA 1' ezwa' haves bez,,-cr� .nk. '''/ � /.f/6,�,�.4/yI -, r�ior-�r of �mzf d� Liov.SG s�o�i.'�/9 l:he cs,�'add'fioGi I C f f 5- r f i 1 ; w5i^.nrj Y i 4' s- r ..'e 71°cFr /es•a" g � �'heC cV 4� n :M �..a vv. ui t �(c n � Est �; _: �a D�3 crr9�. hct .'S `R i�,P.• �'.`'� �+�/ �� d'�?x�l {�i +�, , s4� �4Ssk 7� +.3w5 �3 iif/�YfJrs? — :uv of fry f ,clra w.�� Rdd ,d m�rh 3, r: 4, . of � ct Ar 3 ' � IE• rid!+ if W aA �i}1 al -- -� ---- � t.. ' u a� 9a •.. �'�' /5'� '° ,"3@a'` ,�Yyr��' '�• .fir'; t E. In M � e t "`= T v `e""r'�' +r aF' -r x,,, '� A �`cR t�''+ l•9 �.,.,rwh - r"ri -.�'w�• —r, �_-. ��.� t.. Sud �. » ", •�y� .. MW ';y'_. i. � p5'r' _ ' � i� �.." � _� _ . , ., ,,. �.,, � �-; .� � V �.; - ,.tr ` � -_ f T .y S v __ � � r �!�a ' r' __. ,. � ��. � _ _ �' �i. � _ >> r � a -. a'S, 3 �' u, � 3 ' T ' _ ' � � m;� 'r.� a� ,a � � ti•t . t� � t f� � 46§1�� 1 M» b {` .. ., � � . , ' _ . , REVISIONS: SEPTIC PROFILE 1 - 11 - 12 (N.T.S.) SJy�' BUILDING NALL FIN. FLR. EL +8.1 FT SITE DATA GRADE LINE ELEVATION 6.5 FT. PSER6� GRADE LINE ELEVATION 6.5 FT. SCTM # 1000-116.06-24.1 Pti�Pe e��°o I' MIN. 2' MAX. PROPERTY: KIMOGENOR POINT 50 JACKSON STREET °�o s 1/4"/FT. /8'YFT TOP OF POOL 5.2 FT. NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Q�° ore 5EFTI0 EAGHIN OWNER: KIMOGENOR POINT, INC. c/o BILL ARCHER IE. +5.54' IE, +4.. q' POOL BOT OF POOL 3.2 FT. C, � 29 GREEN MEADOW LANE E. +5.4q' IE. +4.8 1' GROUND WATER ELEV +1.2' In 2� T HUNTINGTON, NY 11743 s0' 12'-IO' 2' MIN rp OAT s� AREA: 257,004.00 SQ. FT.+/- = 5.90 AC. W ZONING: E ( 2 MIN cR roF Mo/V FLOOD: AE (Elevation 6) SURVEYOR: POATHAN BOX 16 FT CORWIN III W . WEST � � ����� LIC E CE RT,NO. 50 11947 Uj Z LICENCE NO. 50467 DATED: MAY 16, 2003 J AapgReNT N)GN I DECEMBER 8, 2003 ADDED WETLAND NOTE O LL A[°NC Atc. SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 ADDED TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY Z LL 864 NOTES: NOTES: Q ♦O M ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 1988 DATUM fn W0op6 EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: 5.0 EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: —5— V W \\ °ri4ry Z LOCATION MAP o 5 ISLAND V O North Fork \ W ount9 CClub� ���A V� w mm W W o O CRdecL H Y w W ew u o ve Q day NEW SUFFOLK, NY SITE \ \ NATERLIQ R \ \ 'ISR SETBACK LINE OF EXI5TING FENCE. \\ \\ H 6H TA�RK °qF,pNe /// TYPICAL BETWEEN RESIDENOE9 � 2:• �' \\\ PROPO'�FD"HAYBALM // NYT�C�J} f/� Q• a WA�\ \ FENCEOURINTG CONSn \\ TRUCTION J m• L \ n ~ RECON5TRUCTED T01./ w• 2 15 It SETBACK SITE NOTES n = Y oU'f ,n C \ —_ _ — -[, pOITION TO.�XI TINS FROM APPA y Y 5TH` F��^ HIGH NATER ARK �w r O \ \ FCRCHFo �� EXISTING AREAS w' 12 \\ TION TO EXISTING, Y m • _ "p Six 6 houses w/ orches and decks: 18,050 sf s\ \ \\ RES LE FOOTPRINT \ \\ b �' p / tONE '>a ( I P EX15TING RES E I 1 \% \ O eyFS E Mp1N C� o Existing areas paved w/gravel: 6,285 sf 15 R SETBACK TO BE RECONS \ ', WATER VALVE e�t�N°,I j0 RS� w \ \\ \ FROM APPARENT NITNO A BASE x 11111 < METER / E NE11P o TOTAL 24,335 sf y UI \ \ HIGH WATER MARK ­ // °a Percentage upland coverage: 9.47% FOOTPRINT NEW 1SLLS��RRroR✓11jpIFO \ 1� �/ TO EXISTING,FO �y g P g ?\ \\ \\ \\ \ 6VI'iER`.�TTP z / EXISTING RLBLIC LNDER6ROUND WATER LINE \ FROM P \ EXISTING CONS caoER PROPOSED AREAS \\ — EXISTING FIRE WMANT a \ \ \ FROPoD HAY BA 4 SILT IIJ Six 6 houses w/ orches and decks: 18,474 sf \ \ \ \�\ FENCE URINE DONS ION,—\\ \ REVISED CONTOUR LING TYP ( P TEST HOLE \\ \\ \\ \\ AREA OF NEW FILL Existing areas paved w/gravel: 6,285 sf \ FENCE MR HAY BALES SILT FENCE DOSNS,ED LO 1 SISIF CTION TOTAL 24,759 sf BY MARK McDONALD GEOSCIENCE \\\ \\\ \\\ \\ �� _ \ a FOUR n:°eE"VR`�ooIn RRE`SIDENCE Percent upland coverage: 9.63% EOF Ne W y NO SCALE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 \ \ - 1200 6AL SEPTIC TANK(ST) SAPS ps o SAM°R� TEST HOLE DATA 11/10/11 ELEV+5.5' \ \ \ \\ \ / \\ 6 LF \ -(6)B'DIA z 2'HIGH LEAGHIN& \\ \\ \\ \\ ,\ \ � FUME LOCATION FOR(9) 6' A.2 0 \ \ \ �\ \ 6H LEACHIN&POOL(EJB)JND Percent upland increase: 1.7 /" 4 F MIXED SAND AND LOAM \ \ \ \\ i / \ \\ _ sT 6s \ LIG \ k' J _\ LINE 4.3 FT. (CLAY CL EXISTI16HeORINi ANITAR STEM TO IN 0783FJ�'1 WATER IN BROWN \ \\ \ 8 l— 1 \ / RIF,- ION �a 8FT. AY CL E \\ \ \ \\ \\ �/ \� \ // � &CONS oN HOUSE NOTES y \\ \ \ \\\\\ �� Imo\ / r I EXISTING HOUSE: 1 OJECTNO: 1105 WATER IN BROWN \ \ 10 FT. ND WATER IN PALE BROWN \ \ \\\ \\ ,/ \ First Floor; 11132 sf 17 FINE TO COARSE SAND SW \ \\ \\ \ — — i EX 51Nf S WITARY 5 Second Floor: 767 sf 1 DRAWN BY: COMMENTS: WATER ENCOUNTERED 4.3' \\ \\ \ �\ S/ TO BE raRovEo TOTAL 1,899 sf UT Covered Porch/Stairs: 664 sf CHECKED BY: \ \ \ \ PROPOSED HAY SILT TS BELOW SURFACE, ELEV +1.2' \\ \\ \\\ FENce VM H&wTIDN TOTAL FOOTPRINT: 1,796 sf GRE'A 'T �ECOlV 1 C B 1 r \\\ \\\\\\ \\\ DATE: 218/12 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS \ GYs°e�,"7r�, \ \\ \\\s ,* PROPOSED HOUSE: SCALE: FOR AREA OF NEW ROOF "AT TN�a�.ryO9 \ >S ? First Floor: 1,201 sf 1: = 30' 0" N FFG o .� TS It SETIShGIG FROM I Second Floor: 1,201 sf SHEET TITLE: PRY WELL AREA x RAINFALL x RUNOFF FACTOR T °oRN r �'9C \\\ \\ '� APPARENT H16H WATER MARK TOTAL: 2,555 sf ON "A" 2615 SF x (2/12 FT) x IA • 455 W. FT. �sRq°N° \ � Covered Porch/Stairs: 866 sf USE: (1) 8' DIAMETER x W HIGH FOOL \ C+Np2? ,q,,p \2 TOTAL FOOTPRINT: (1) 8' X 4' STORM DRAIN RING • 168 G1. SITE PLAN USE. (1) 8 DIAMETER x 5 HI(9H POOL SITE PLAN joR Ni°N Wy Percent footprint increase: 23.5% (U 8' X 5' STORM DRAIN RING - 211 CU. FT. (IUSE. 8'(1) 81 DIAMETER x X 2' STORMDRAIN : 6PO4°U. FT. SCALE: 1 " = 30'-0" PROVIDED REQUIRED 469 CU. FT. > 485 CU. FT. RECEIVED SHEET NO: � o FED 09 2012 v 'RfadRSl OP APPEALS REGULATORY APPROVALS i JA Cks ON / WAST GREEK • ,��� : ,� STMON. W Lu - V Z HO U. _ \�\ LAND LAwN /r O 10o EXISTING NEIGHBOLL 9IN5 \ / Z SANITARY SYSTEM ITO �\ °'` 0to REMAIN I STORY OOD BULKH I W Z I STORY EXISTING NEIGHBOR( I Z I MEQ . � 5ANITARY SYSTEM T I (n MAIN NO SANITARY FACILITIES Z d \ FOR THIS STRUCTUREWOOD BULKHEAD (CLUBHOUSE) 0 WOOD BULKHEAD . . O PROPERTY LINE W Z Lu ui 00 EXISTING NEIGHBbRING SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER I AUTHORITY UNDERGROUND = SANITARY SYSTEM 7th - I I-" Y REMAIN I-I/2 5TOR I WATER MAIN \ ME HOUSE Cal BEACH �\ �\ ..,. CANAL LAWN SITE I DATA I EXISTING GESSPbQLS TO SCTM # 1000-116-06-24.1 BE ABANDONED I ,_LE '• , \� wisAND / PROPERTY: KIMOGENOR POINT 50 JACKSON STREET ad BB\\ NEW SUFFOLK NY Z''.x •i• SUFFO COUNTY WATEfie AUTHOR TY UNDERGROXND M Q• APPARENT HIGH WATER MARK WATER IN J 3 0 OWNER: KIMOGENOR POINT INC. > 2 EXISTING NF1614BORING `� /' C/O BILL ARCHER W J• 29 GREEN MEADOW LANE ' W• SANITARY SYSTS�1 TO REMAIN ` HUNTINGTON, N7 11743 W - \ M M. SITE AREA: 257,004.00 SQ. FT.+/- = 5.90 AC. BINGHAM RESIDENCE EW PROPOSED ' ZONING: R-40 `\\ SANITARY SYSTEM FLOOD: EOFNewy ` AE (Elevation 6) P EXISTING NEIGHB52RING ZONE * 5o 5C, 3qt, SANITARY SYSTEM -FOul —E BEACH REMAIN SURVEYOR: NATHAN TAFT CORWIN III Po sox 16 I D a JAMESPORT, NY 11947 LICENCE #50467 PROJECT NO: 1105 \\ DRAWN BY: \ EXISTING NEIGHBO G\ \SANITARY SYSTEM Td•\ I CHECKED BY: TCS REMAIN DATE: 2/8/12 NOTES \ SURVEY INFORMATION SCALE: 1" = 30'.0" \ �\ SUPPLEMENTED w/ AERIAL SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN INFORMATION FROMM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH AND FIELD SURVEY APPARENT HIGH WATER MARK \\\ BY ARCHITECT OVERALL SCALE . I „ = 30' \ �pROPERTY LINE SITE PLAN BEACH � SHEET NO: \ I RRC, 2fl i FEB ©9 2 (BOARD OFA 201pppALS 2 Lu Lu z ❑ FE I. Lu rAM LL IAS� 0 I Li ------- LL Z LL I II I II o cl) 1- Lu STAIR H&LII Lu D z - - I ❑ 0a1a IIII II I II I II0 z IL 0 F�g w II L) < 0 II W z Lu i C7 woo SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SECOND FLOOR PLAN ad Z. U) LLI :3 W. Lu. ry il[Et III II II II II II II FORnH II II II II II II II II II I II II II II II II II II I II II II I II II II I II II II II II II II OF NEW, II II II Il qP O 11 ill ill F�I 11 ------- - Klm� ENTRY HAL X- PROJECT NO: 1105 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION acus: IV-TaDRAWN BY: TCS CHECKED BY: PORLH DATE: 2/8/12 SCALE: 1/8'. 1. 01. SHEET TITLE: FIRST FLOOR PLAN N�AW-1'4" PLANS ELEVATIONS 6 0 SHEET NO: RECEIVED l-'-3 09 2012 BOARD OPAPP,,,41.S 3 REGULATORY APPROVALS