Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-01/30/1974SoUthold Town Planning Board E31-1UTHDLD~ L. !., N. Y. 119'71 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS John Wlokham, Chairman Henry Moisa Alfred 'Grebe Henry Raynor Frank Coyle MI NLrr]~S SOUTHOLD TOWN P LANNT'NG BOARD January 30~ 1974 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was held at 7:30 p.m.~ Wednesday~ January 30, 1974~ at the Town Clerk's Office~ Main Road, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: John Wickham, Chairman; Henry Moisa, Vice-Chairman; Henry Raynor; Alfred Grebe. Absent: Frank S. Coyle. Fairway Farms: Gary olsen, Bsq., Philip Babcock and Russell Case appeared. Olsen: We received your letter dated January 8, 1974 giving final approval subject to certain conditions. One was about the bond. We have had the amoun~ of the bond approved by the Town Board. Wickham: You have to present the bond. They have got to accept it and the Town Clerk has to notify us that it has been accepted. Olsen: The bond is there and the amount has been approved and Mr. Martocchia ind~ated final approval must be given before they sign the bond. Wickham: They*rant to know that we are satisfied with this. .Olse~: Presentation.of the maps corrected as to the recreat~ional area has b~en done. You now have final maps which have the legends which you requested. The Town Attorney suggested that since it is going to be subject to the swale we have also put that in. The drainage area has been separated from the-recreatfonal area. There is an easement for safety*valve drainage points. You wanted presentation of a legal instrument covering the responsibility of the low owners for the swale. I have personally tendered to the Town Attorney and sent you a copy of his letter and I have taken his language and put in the covenants and restrictions. The Town Planning Board ~ ~2- Ja~Jary 30, 1974 Attorney has the original copy as well as the recording fee for the County Clerk. I feel that contingency has been fulfilled. As for satisfaction of the court action, the wetlands lawsuit is a distinct and separate issue and it is an unfair and unnecessary contingency and should be removed by the Board. Since that letter of January 8th I received another letter requesting that we redraw the sketch plan with correct elevations from Greenway Drive south. That work has been done. Wickham: There are v~¥ few people in this town who realize how much dike i~nd o~ this type of material settles. Ntt. Case and I are two people who realize this. Taking yesterday's elevations and taking them in three months, if we have normal weather, you will get a subsidence of about an inch a month. This might be a very valuable contribution to your legal case. Saying so doesn't carry as much weight as if it shows in the survey. 0.1sen: We got it because it was requested by the Planning Board. Lot #19 also had some fill put on it. We show you the changes in elevations of lot #19. Babcock: Villa suggested that when this fill was there you might as well raise this lot in keeping with the lots adjacent to it. We may have raised that lot in the middle section of the 270 feet by some two to three feet. Olsen: I would request that the Board now indicate it would give final approval and let us take the final maps tonight to get signatures from the Health Department and Environmental Department and~ after receiving them, someone could be authorized to sign the maps so they can be recorded. ~!ckham: If none of the Board has any objection, you are free to take this map and get your signatures ~pdated. The Town Attorney notified me that our requirement that the case at law be settled wasn't a valid reason, and we try to always act on his findings, so the only thing now is we have to have in the file a letter from the Town Clerk saying the bond has been received and you have to have an updated map. 01sen: This map we will take today and get the signatures tomorrow. The bond was delivered to the Town Clerk on December 28, 1973. The Town Board has approved the amount of the bond. Wickham: They are waiting to hear that we have approved the amended map. We-will take action on it tonight and me will notify the Town Board that the changes that were requested by the Town Attorney and the Highway Super- intendent have been made and that we have a copy of the map if they want to see it. Ols. en: After we have the signatures and we bring them back to your office, it would not be necessary to come to another Planning Board meeting? Wickham: The conditions will be met or waived and we are simply waiting notice from the Town Clerk. As soon as we get the letter, then we can sign it. Olsen: Would it be in order for the Board to send me a letter to say the contingency of the lawsuit is no longer a contingency? Wickham: Yes. Planning Board -~- --3- ~anuary 30, 1974 Casola minor subdivision: Gary Olsen, Esq. appeared. Wickham: Our attorney advised us that we cannot withhold approval but I think we can stipulate some conditions. As I have said before, to raise this to a six foot elevation that the county requires would take about 8,000 cubic yards per acre. There are about eight acres and we are talking about 50~000 cubic yards to fill it. It seems to me that an owner ought to think three or four times before planning on this size of an undertaking because 50,000 yards of fill will cost between $50,000 and $1007000 and I just don't know if he knows what he is getting into. We cannot say no but we can say to meet the requirements of the County Board of Health and not just for where the sewer is. I think we are entitled to say that. We are not going to allow your client to just fill the land where his house and cesspools are going to be. I honestly think the guy would be foolish to do it because he is going to contaminate his own water. There can only be lateral drainage because of the dense and heavy bottom. From a practical point of view, $50,000 to $100,000 to fill is a real deterrent. I think your client ought to be made aware of it. We are not going to allow him to just fill where his cesspool and house are going to be because we have bad too many complaints. p~sen: Your original denial has been withdrawn? Wi ckham: On advice of our attorney we are willing to reopen the case. qlsen: Will you send me that kind of letter that, pn advice of your attorney, you will reopen the case. My last letter indicates I am resubmitting the matter. Nit. Wickham read the letter referred to. January 28, 1974 Re: Laurie Properties, Orient Minor Subdivision I have been advised that you have taken this matter up with the Town Attorney. I hereby reinstate the application for a minor subdivision and request that you place same on your calendar. I will be before the Board on other matters on January 30, 1974 and perhaps this matter could be also discussed. Very truly yours, /s/ Gary Flanner Olsen Wickham: We put you on the agenda and we are currently discussing it and I can only say that the Board will reconsider. 9.isen: Before you do put any conditions or contingency on your approval I would like to go to the Department of Health and discuss with them what the rules and regulations and requirements are so I am better informed so I will have more information for the Board as well as myself. Wickham: By the same token, we will go to the County Board of Health and tell them what position we are in. Planning Board .~ -4~ ~4anuary 30, 1974 Greenfields: Mr. Raynor reported the Scperintendent of Highways is workin~ on the drainage changes he wants to make. Leisure Greens: Gary Olsen, Esq. and Mr. Loria, architect, appeared. Olsen: This is Mr. Loria who is the architect who has prepared the preliminary design of the proposed condominium community, I received a letter from the Planning Board indicating you want six copies of the maps showing the zoning in the surrounding area. I am submitting them tonight. Wickham read the letter from the county requesting additional information. "Please forward a map depicting all ~nd uses and zoning within 200 feet of the subject premises." 91sen: This would be a planned retirement community, The minimum age would be restricted to residents of 55 years or older with no children of school age. It would be 46.16 acres with 74 buildings with two two, bedroom units of 1,161.5 square feet and two one-bedroom units of 926.5 square feet in each building. There would be a total of 296 units. They would not be rentals. Every unit would be owned by the individual people. They would have the responsibility of maintaining the inside of the buildings and eventually the corporation would maintain the outside and the grounds. We would have to comply with all the New York State regulations on condominiums. There would also be a recreational hall and a swimming pool for the residents. There would be a water system to supply water. There would be a sewage disposal system meeting county requirements. All the roads would be private and built to Town specifications and maintained by the corporation and there will be ample parking space according to the code. We have had some tax figures on school taxes. The assessed valuation is estimated at $14,300 for each building. The school tax is $7.61 per hundred. Each building would bring in $1,088.23 or a total of $80,529 for school tax. The estimated school tax generated would be approximately $80,000. There would not be any children to put into the school system from this project. I think that this particular area north of the post office is a particularly desirable and unique spot for this kind of a planned retire- men/ community. We are all aware that there are a number of senior citizens who do not want their own home and there is a definite need. The only one I know of is Colonial Village ~nich has a long waiting list. It would be a real asset to the Town of Southold in an ideal location with easy access to the Post Office~ the stores~ the drug store~ the library~ the fire department, the churches and public transportation. A number would not want to have a car. It would be within easy walking distance of facilities of benefit to these people. I know the area is now zoned for one acre residential use and with forty plots there would be for'fy families living there with approximately 100 children going to the school at a cost of $152 a year. Forty homes with 1200 square feet is $4,200 or tax generated at $31,900. The cost to the school district would be $152,000, so this planned retirement community would serve a very real need for the Township of Southold. Not only is it in a desirable spot, it is farmland with no homes, but also it would contribute tremendously to the taxes without generating a bill. We have also made presentations before a couple of organizations within the community. I made a presentation before the ~attituck Senior Citizens Club and I can say the response was a very favorable one. Also, a presentation was made before the Cutchogue-New Planning Board ~/ ~5- ~nuary 30, 1974 Suffolk Chamber of Commerce. A resolution was presented signed by Fred W. Kaelin, Jr. It reads as follows: At the regular monthly meeting of the Cutchogue-New Suffolk Chamber of Commerce~ held at the Fisherman's Rest, January 9th~ 1974, architectural plans for a Senior Citizens Planned Retirement Community were presented by Leisure Greens~ Inc. N~ny questions were asked and answered and after much discussion a motion was made approving the architectural plans: site and type of housing and a change of zone from residential to NI-1 as presented by Leisure Greens Inc. It was seconded and unanimously approved. The membership, at this time, felt that a project of this type would be an asset to the ~utchogue Village Community. For the Chamber /s/ Fred W. Kaolin, Jro, President We will try to sound out the feeling of the businessmen. We are hoping to make a presentation before the League of Women Voters as well as the Southold Senior Citizens Club and the North Fork Taxpayers' Association so everyone will be informed about the project. Mr. Lorio is here to answer any questions you might have. ~ickham: How many of the members of the Chamber of Commerce were present at the presentation? Olsen: I don't know the number. Wickham: My information is that there were somewhat less than 20% of the ~there present at that particular meeting and that this probably does not represent the fe~ling of the total membership. This is opinion only and I don't know as it is important except for one thing. This Board, in connection with this particular subdivision, found that the developers were untruthful twice. We are entitled to look at this with a somewhat jaundiced eye because twice they have made statements which upon the Board's investigation turned out not to be true. At one time they were asked to speak at the Blue Top ands at the same time, the Supervisor and I were. asked to be there and they excused themselves. At the very least this leaves a very poor taste in one's mouth. I don't know the reason because I was invited and they were invited by the Chamber of Commerce. When two o~lthe principles come in and say to this Board that so and so is favorably inclined and they say, "Never," you think somebody is careless with the ~ruth. I won't say we are prejudiced but some of, us have reservations. Olsen: What are the two untruthful statements? Wickham: I won't start a case in libel. It was when they first presented this. Can you blame us for being unhappy about it? They said all the residents in town were favorably inclined. That was not true. This letter from the Cutchogue-New Suffolk Chamber of Commerce is about one-quarter tzue. The residents are largely strongly opposed to it. Planning Board ~,~ -6~ ~ary 30, 1974 Olsen: I can only go by what the letter says. I don't know what percentage it represents but there is a letter from the Chamber of Commerce supporting it. Wickham: There is nothing wrong with the letter. The fact that it represents less than 25% of the membership, and basically the business people in the village are opposed to it, makes it of relatively less valueo Olsen: I don't know what has happened in the past. I got involved in the early part of December of 1973. What happened a year ago I do not have the faintest idea. If you are basi~ some sort of conclusion on it, it is important for me to know what you are talking about. Wickham: It is not in conformity with the master plan. We have no confidence £n the developers, with reason. Raynor: You are here tonight to request a change of zone on the property. What is the present use of the property? Olsen: It is farmland, but I don't think it was farmed last year. Raynor: Have the prospective developers contacted the adjacent property owners to get any viewpoint they might hold on it? Olsen: I have not. I don't know if they have. Raynor: You ran through some figures of forty homes on the property. would question your tax generation figures. I don't think 1200 square feet is valid. Wickham: I don't think that comparison is meaningful at all. If you say every residential home is going to increase the school tax load, then the obvious will be we will build no more homes. Raynor: The first section had received the change of zone on Griffing Street. Would you find out for me whether the developers are under contract to the town to develop School Street Extension to the west of the intersection? Olsen: Yes. Raynor: I would like it shown on the map as a proposed extension. Olsen: I have to go back to my client to let them know what is happening. The~ will want to know what is bothering you. Raynor: I suggest you review the application for the change of zone file of Leisure Greens. Olsen: Can you give me a clue as to what is in it? Raynor: If you review the minutes it will give you a clue. Wickham: I think that you are looking for trouble because the last request for change of zone to multiple residence was in Mattituck and the developess were only asking for about 75%. This one comes closer to 100%. Planning Board ~ ~7~ .... January 30~ 1974 Olsen: It still complies. ~aynor: May I caution you to bear in mind the height and sideyard regula~ tions. In certain cases these have not been able to comply and because of that, they have had to go to the Board of Appeals as a result of which we think you should hold out a 10% working factor. Wickham: We won't approve anything without it. We are not interested in People who say you are allowed so much, this is what we are going to have. You get half-way through and something isn't quite right and you have to go to the Board of Appeals and we are recommending the Board of Appeals grant no variances. R~ynor: We found that developers who tried to put in large-size apartments were running into a problem coming up with the length of the building complying and laying it out physically on the property. O1 s e n: Raynor: Ols en: Raynor: I hope your decision is based on need and location. Do you intend to contact adjacent property owners? I don't think it is necessary but t will discuss it with my client. In your presentation you speak of having roads which would be private. You would landlock a portion to the north and this becomes a planning problem. The Beebe property and the Zuhoski property would be landlocked. By landlocked I am excluding some 15 foot right of way to Depot Lane. When your plan is developed you can't just consider this piece. Olsen: If they went into one-acre development it would be the same thing. We are asking that the Board give serious consideration to the need, location and general concept. The plans are preliminary now and will be changed as the project progresses but I would certainly hope it wouldn't be based on emotion and something that has taken place in the past. Wickham: I think saying "emotion" is unfair, it is "lack of confidence". Julius Zebroski Mr. Zebroski showed a sketch of a plan for a minor subdivision. The Board told him he couldn't have a reserved area for some further time. He would have to include the whole piece of property and perhaps come in for a major subdivision. Mr. Zebroski said he would speak to his lawyer before he proceeded any further. Stanley Stedjeski minor subdivision: Richard Lark, Bsq. appeared. .Lark: The map, if it is approved, will be recorded along with the covenants and restrictions as to no further subdivision. The lots are huge but because of the woodland and terrain it is felt that they cannot be any smaller. The bluff line is shown and the height and the test hole as to what the soil is. Although it says 102,000 square feet, they are about 60,000 or 70~000 square feet because the bluff consumes alot of the property. The bank slopes down. It drops sharply and then gradually goes down, Planning Board ~_~ ~8~ <=~ January 30, 1974 Lark: There is virtually no beach at average highwater and they are up in the air. There is an existing foundation but the house has been torn down. It will be filled in. It is of no value as far as building is concerned today. It has been in the open for 25 years or more. The roads will be 50 foot rights of way and there is a deeded right of way on the southerly portion. Wickham: Sometimes when we have these minor subdivisions and we think it is in the best interests of the town, we insist that some part of the road be built to town specifications. Lark: Mr. Brader will not allow it. He would be strongly opposed to any ~ghway going in. Wickham: Put it in just above his right of way. Lark: What would it accomplish? R?ynor: Stanley Road is a better setup. Lark: If you go from here the bluff generally cuts in. The provision that you put in the subdivision Stanley Road will take care of the other property if it is ever developed. Wickham: We will want a corrected map. Lark: He was built on a gore because of the topography there. He has had erosion and so by widening it he can take property conservation methods to save what he has. ~ckham: We will have to have a legal instrument that we can file with this. Lark: I have it right here. Board as part of it. I will send a copy of the restrictions to the Wickham: We want the restrictions of no further subdivision. Wilton & Clanton - KOA: Mr. Lark and one of the principles appeared. Mr. Wickham read the letter from Mr. Barnett of the Soil & Water Conservation Service. January 21, 1974 To: Southold Town Planning Board In answer to Fpur request for information on the proposed Kampgrounds of America, Inc. on Queen Street in Greenport, New York we have visited the site, augered the soils in question and have the following comments. There are two types of soil on this 24 acre plus parcel. All of the land in the 5.2 acre parcel nearest to the State Highway is Riverhead sandy loam soil with only slight limitations for sewage effluent disposal. Planning Board ~J -9. ~uary 30: 1974 The 18.8 acre parcel to the south is roughly divided in half with the higher elevation westerly portion containing Riverhead sandy loam and the easterly portion containing a different soil, R~verhead sandy loam w~tb mottled subsoil. The mottled subsoil area has seasonal high water tables between 1~1/2 and 4 feet be~w the surface. As such it would have moderate limitations for the development of streets and parking lots~ camping areas~ homesltes and sewage effluent disposal. These limitations would be caused by occasional standing water at or near the surface: water collecting in any shallow depressions that may be created, and water around footing and foundations of recreation buildings. The water table may fluctuate from season to season. Casual filling of low areas may bury valuable top soil, which is usually essential for maintaining good sod cover in a cecreation campground where foot traffic is heavy. I would suggest that the developer submit plans for building~ roads~ and other structure location including information on surface and subsurface drainage proposed so that we can review them with an eye to preventing unnecessary deterioration or hazards in the campground. /s/ Charles R. Barnett District Conservationist Wickham: This corroborates our thinking that this is a clayfield and you have a very real problem about sewage disposal and as such we feel the best bet is to arrange with the Greenport Sewer System. Lark: The letter verifies the engineering he had done. Princip,l,e: We were surprised at the sand and gravel we did find under those two portions. Lark: If the Planning Board is disposed to the use, is there any recommendations you would like to make to have the proviso that there is an arrangement with the Greenport Sewer. Wickham: I have spent a great deal of time with the Town Attorney and I am a little hesitant about just how far we can go in asking for reservations and restrictions. I will talk to the Town Attorney and see what restrictions we can make and I would like to talk to the supervisor. Lark: This is a location thing and if the Village of Greenport means what it says and there are no p~ans to do' anything with that property: you will go a long way to find a spot like this. It does have problems - the sewage. If Greenp0rt will handle it, and I hope they will as they a~e looking at it a little more favorably because it will just be a seasonal use. Principle: We are getting more data that the water needed would be less than what we had expected and this would affect the sewage system. Wi ckham: I think we can have an answer by next meeting. Planning Board ~/ -10w ~.January $0, 1974 Highland Road Corporation: Mr. Lark appeared. The Board reviewed the maps and discussed the plan with Mr. Lark. Board will study it and make their recommendations. The / Gasper Pisacano: Division into undersized lots The following letter was directed to be written to the Board of Appeals. In answer to your letter of January 10th, the Board is under the distinct impression that we have been told specifically by the Town Attorney that we may not approve any lotsuunder 40,000 square feet in a minor subdivision. This Board can only suggest that on the map by Van Tuyl dated October 8~ 1969, the two lots fronting on Paradise Point Road be made 40,000 square feet, which would mean that the lot remaining where now the building is would be less than 40,000 square feet. Since both the lots fronting on Paradise Point Road have to have 150 foot front feet on one road or the other, we would suggest that the lot lines be changed in any way necessary to provide both the minimum frontage and minimum areas. On motion made by Mr. Grebe, seconded by Mr. Moisa, it was RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Planning Board regular meeting of January 15, 1974 be approved. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Moisa, Wickham, Raynor On motion made by NLr. Raynor, seconded by Mr. Moisa, it was RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Planning Board executive meeting of January 22, 1974 be approved. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Moisa, Wickham, Raynor On motion made by Mr. Wickham, seconded by Mr. Grebe, it was RESOLVED that the Sou/hold Town Planning Board recommend disapproval of the request for change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to '~-1" General Multiple Residence District of certain property located at Cutchogue, New York, known as Leisure Greens, Inc. This recommendation was made in view of the fact t~at th'e Planning Board presented in the master plan the conception that there be no multiple residences between Mattituck and Southold and this was supported by 85% of the people. This is not in conformity with the Master Plan and the Board does not consider it good use of this land. It appears on the surface that this type of land use would tend to landlock or create a block of the property to the north, east and west. A copy of the letter from the Cutchogue,New Suffolk Chamber of Commerce recommending approval seems to be at variance with the expressed views of some of the businessmen in the village. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Moisa, Wickham AbsTained: Mr. Raynor Planning Board ~.~ -11- ,~luary 30, 1974 Mr. Moisa received the following recommendations to amend the subdivision regulations: It has been recommended to amend subdivision regulations to require developers to install firewells or proper facilities for fire protection. These firewells are to be located between the curb and sidewalk area. They would like to request a map of a subdivision be furnished so the location of wells or facilities could be determined by concerned fire district officials. They suggest that all requirements and regulations be approved as to the need of each fire district for fire protection. In cases where such facilities are impossible to install~ a cash consid- eration be required by agreement of parties concerned which could be used toward purchase of equipment such as tankers for fire protection in these bard-pressed areas. All requests and regulations should be approved by mutual agreement of said fire district commissioners and the Planning Board. On motion made by Mr. Raynor, seconded by Mr. Grebe~ it was RESOLVED that on advice of the Town Attorney the stipulation in the minutes of January 4:1974 meeting of the Sou/hold Town Planning Board that the pending court case in the Southold Town Justice Court against Fairway Farms subdivision be satisfactorily disposed of is hereby waived. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe: Raynor, Moisa Abstained: Mr. Wickham Fairway Farms: Rayno. r: I am upset that these people have filled 2500 to 3000 square feet of wetlands. Wickham: Under our rules and regulations they were allowed to dredge a p~nd and to construct a low profile dike. They erred in digging the pond in the wrong place and placing fill on wetlands rather than upon the existing dike as they requested. This Board requested both the Town Board and the State Department of Environmental Conservation to correct this problem by replacing this wetland material back to its natural position and condition and we were not allowed to do so by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation contrary to the agreement from Mr. Taormina in charge of the entire marine district. Refer to Mr. Olsen's comments in the minutes of December 6, 1973. They weren't able to fill the pond as suggested because the state was insistent on their filing for a permit. On motion made by Mr. Grebe, seconded by Mr. Raynor, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the amended map of Fairway Farms subdivision da~ed January 22, 1974 showing the drainage recommended by the Southold Town Highway Superintendent and the Sou/hold Town Highway Committee and showing by dotted line that swale area outside the bounds of the highway. This also includes the sketch map dated January 30, 1974 showing elevations of the dikes in January 1973 and on January 29: 1974. Planning Board ~ -12, .=~uary 30, 1974 Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Raynor, Moisa Abstained: Mr. Wickham On motion made by Mr. ~&be, seconded by Mr. Ray-nor, it was RESOLVED that the chairman or vice-chairman be empowered to sign the Map of the fairway farms subdivision when the notice of the acceptance of the bond by the Town Board is received from the Town Clerk and a letter is received from the To~n Attorney stating that the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions with respect to the $ foot swale area on each lot is acceptable to him. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Raynor, Moisa Abstained: Mr. Wickham On motion made by Mr. Moisa, seconded by Mr. Raynor, it was RESOLVED ~hat the chairman be authorized to sign the map of the minor subdivision of Joseph Wiederman and John Gilowski. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Raynor, Moisa, Wickham On motion made by Mr. Raynor, seconded by Mr. Grebe, it was RESOLVED that on advice of the Town Attorney the Southold Town Planning Board reopens the matter of the application for a minor subdivision of Robert Casola on property located at Orient~ New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Raynor, Moisa, Wickham On motion made by Mr. Ray-nor, seconded by Mr. Moisa, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board request the developer of the minor subdivision of Robert Casola at Orient, New York, to present am environmental impact study. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Raynor, Moisa~ Wickham On motion made by Mr. Moisa, seconded by Mr. Raynoz, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board request the recommendations of the Southold To~n Environmental Council on the minor subdivision of Robert Casola at Orient, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe, Raynor, Moisa, Wickham Planning Board ~13~ <~. e.___~uary 30, 1974 7 lqret The Board requests the engineer's statement on the map and nine more paper copies of the subdivision to be sent to the proper agencies. Bast Hill The chairman signed the tracing copy and 2 linen copies of the final map to be sent to the survey, Robert A. Kart, ?o~o Robins Island The Board acknowledges receipt of two maps. February 20, 1974 was designated as the next regular ~a~ing of the Southold To~m Planning Board. On motion made by Mr. Raynor, seconded by Mr. Moisa, it was I~SOLVED that the site plan of Walt Whitman Federal Savings and Loan be approved. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grebe~ Raynor, Moisa, Wickham On motion made by Mr. Raynor, seconded by Mr. Moisa and carried the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Murie~t-Brush/Secretary Southold Town Planning Board ~-'--~n Wi'ckham, Chairma'n