Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-15.-9-8.1 (2) WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, April 25, 2011 4:00 p.m. Applications Project name: T.K. Alpha, LLC Shopping Ctr. SCTM#: 1000-140-2-20 Location: ~= 535 Pike Street, on the north side of Pike street, approximately 100 feet i~ east of Lg~ i_ane ~in.the H.a..rnlet Business Zgn.!~g District Ua.tt!tuqk Description: : This site plan is for the proposed construction of a 2,573 s.f. mix-use building consisting of 3 units on the first floor for retail use, 2 at 554 s.f. each and another at 1,200 s.f. and 2 residential apartments on the second floor, 554 s.f. each. In addition, there is an existing 605 s.f. Status: :~ ~odin9 Action: Provide comments to the ZBA regarding the revised plans submitted by applicant. Attachments '~ Staff Repprt~.D[~ff Comments Locatiopl i 402Q0 NYS .Route. 2~ .O~ief~t Description: . Proposed construction of an 80 ft. monopole wireless facility having internally mounted antenna for two wireless providers New Cingular Statu~sl Pending [ Action: . Applicant's agent to discuss their up-coming revision to the application to , rep ace MetroPCS w th T-Mob e as a second carrier. Attachments: None Project name Neumann, James SCTM# 1000-107-1-1 1,107-1-1.2 Location: . Mattituck Creek and Mill Road, Mattituck one.f~xist!qg.house, bordering Matt. ituck. Oreek in. the R-8o Zone.: Status: , Pending AttachrneqtSl i Staff Report Location: Northwest corner of Griffing Street and School House Lane, i approx mate y.! 079 feet r!0rth of Main R0ad~ in Cutchogue. Action: Discuss site visit & amendment to agreement for shrub & tree ha~esting Attachmen.ts: .... None R]~, NIELSEN, HUBER 8,: COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW T~:LEP}ION~: (O31) 425-41OO F~.CSI~,IXLE: (O31) 425-4104 March 10, 2011 VIA UPS DELIVERY Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair and Members of the Planning Board Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Pending Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Applications for Proposed Construction of a Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: Orient By the Sea Restaurant & Marina 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York SCTM#: 1000 I5 9 8.1 Dcar Chairman Sidor and Members of the Planning Board: We are the attorneys with respect to the captioned matter. We respectfully request that the application be scheduled for the next available Work Session before the Planning Board. Please advise. Very truly yours, RI~, NIELSEN, ~HUBE~I?,~&j~ COUGHL1N, LLP La~vrence C. Rfi LCR:mk cc via email: Ms. Heather Lanza, Director of Planning Winser~ Krist~/ From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: John Coughlin [jcoughlin@rnhclaw.com] Tuesday, October 19, 2010 5:10 PM Winser, Kristy Marisa Knoth; Lawrence Re RE: Application Status updates Kristy, As to the two Metro applications before the ARC on Thursday, I will be in California, but Larry will attend in case any questions come up - and so that we can make sure these two matter move quickly to decision. As to the AT&T/Metro application at Orient by the Sea, you are correct that the ball is in our court - the carriers are conducting their analyses and preparing responses to the Town's questions/con~ents. As to the T-Mobile application at the Orient FD, the underlying proposal is under review/revision, and T-Mobile is working on the preparation of all necessary materials and also the Escrow deposit. Thank you for your ongoing assistance and attention to these matters. Yours truly, John John J. Coughlin R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Telephone: (631) 425-4100 Facsimile: (631) 425-4104 E-Mail: jcoughlin@rnhclaw.com This e-mail message and attached files, if any, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain information protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or his/her agent, any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of the information in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message. ..... Original Message ..... From: Winser, Kristy [mailto:kristy.winser@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 4:49 PM To: John Coughlin Subject: Application Status updates John; I wanted to follow up with the Public hearing held last night for the 2 Metro applications located at the Southold Police Station,Peconic and Penny L%unber, Mattituck. In moving forward with the review for each application, I have scheduled each for the Architectural Review Committee for this Thursday @ 4pm. The meeting will held in the Town Hall annex meeting room located upstairs next to the Planning Department. I realize it's last minute however being the meetings are held monthly, the next available is after the November Public Hearing on the 15th so, I wanted the Planning Board to have the opportunity to make a decision on either application if ready for a decision? ARC review is required in the Code and can not be waived but I would like to point out that comments/recommendations by the committee are for consideration by the Planning Board only. Due to the fact that these applications are collocations on existing towers and no major issues, I don't think its necessary for you to be present at the meeting if you cant ! make it, but that is up to Just let me know either way.~ Also, as mentioned to you yesterday, I wanted to follow up on the status of two applications reviewed at our in house meeting held August 8, 2010. According to my notes, you informed staff that your office is currently working on revisions & responses to the letter dated July 7, 2010 for the applications located at Orient by the Sea? Further it was determined that one document for each application (structure & collocate) for a number of items that are the same ex, photosims, emissions info ect.. can be submitted. In addition you stated that a letter will be submitted to why the location of the structure is being proposed with respect to the comments by the Board of Trustees & DEC. Last, it was noted that you will need to prove why they need a new tower ~ the height being proposed rather locating on the building. Please confirm if this is correct? As for T-mobile Orient FD, my notes from he meeting state that you had requested the ZBA to hold on scheduling a Public Hearing because your clients were working on revisions to plans? Is this accurate? The last correspondence on file is a letter to you dated May 25, 2010 informing you about the transition to the new consultant CMS hired by the Town. Also, in that letter was a request for escrow in the amount of $6,600 with an explanation of the amount balance requested in order to proceed with the review. Please advice accordingly. As always contact me anytime to discuss this further. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy. Winser~town.southold.ny.us -LI ,f,,VJ, l,/ S ~4~w T ~ s s ~4 TW T FS edr~sday ' ~ 2 3 W 8 ~1,013,]213 24 5 6 7 8 9~0X1 29 30,~ 262728:2930 22~242S2S27 2~ 102021222324 Notes 00 MTout 9oo 10 0o ,,- E~¢ ~ HL/KW PIF Town Arty on wireless 2 O0 HL./KW/MF/Dick ComJ with LarTy Re 3oo 4oo ~ oo Winser, Kdsty 3 10/19/2010 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSK1 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 7, 2010 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 RE: Letters from attorney Coughlin on Metro PCS & New Cingular ~ Orient by the Sea (2) dated June 21, 2010, letter from attorney Re' on Metro PCS ~ Southold Police Station dated June 22, 2010 and Letter from attorney Coughlin on Metro PCS ~ Penny Lumber dated June 29, 2010. Dear Mr. Coughlin: We acknowledge receipt of your letter dated June 22, 2010 regarding the Town's use of a consultant to assist the Planning Board in its review of wireless facility applications. The use of a consultant is entirely discretionary and authorized by §280-74(A)(4) of the Town Code, as amended. Contrary to your suggestion, the use of a consultant is not predicated on the complexity of the application. In fact, the Moy case, which analyzed our Trustees use of a consultant pursuant to the authority granted under our Wetlands Code, has no bearing on the Planning Board's use of consultants in this or any wireless facility application. As you are aware the Southold Town Planning Board has deemed it necessary and reasonable to hire a consultant to help with the review of all wireless facility applications and has retained the services of Center for Municipal Services (CMS). The Planning Board has every confidence that the experts at CMS are highly qualified and have the requisite expertise to assist in the review of such applications. While you certainly have the right to review and comment on CMS' analysis of your application, your comments should be directed to the substance of their analysis. To expedite the review process, the Town requests that any response to the reviews issued by CMS be sent directly to CMS. CMS' review letters are reviewed and approved by the Planning Board prior to your receiving them and have the full support of the Planning Board. Further, in accordance with the provisions of our Town Code and as previously stated in our letter dated June 15, 2010, withdrawals will be made from time to time to reimburse the Town fur the costs incurred for professional review and that determination is solely within the discretion of the Planning Board. At your request, the Town will provide you with a copy of our consultant's invoice for services rendered in conjunction with the review of your client's applications, however, we do not and will not agree that payment of those services is subject to any determination by your firm regarding reasonableness or scope. In the event that the amount held in escrow by the Town exceeds the amount of actual invoicing at the conclusion of the project, the remaining balance will be refunded promptly. As for the completeness of your applications, you need only provide the information requested and your applications will be deemed complete and we can move to the next step in the process. To accomplish that goal, we strongly recommend a conference call between your firm, CMS and the individuals that are preparing your technical information to go over the comments in the letter, and specifically, what the Board deems necessary to complete the application. It should be further noted that the Planning Board concurs with CMS and that the above-referenced applications are incomplete at this time. The Planning Board must have the information requested to fulfill its obligation to due diligence in reviewing applications. We will continue to process the information you provide in a timely manner, as will our consultant. Very truly yours, Martin Sidor Planning Board Chair CC: CMS Martin D. Finnegan, Town Attorney Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher luvoice Number Ch~k No. Entered by Audit Date ~own Clexk General ~.ccount Number Payee Certification CorrqmyName C J~ '~ Depactuieat Certification Client: Southold NY ATT 40200 Main Rd. Orient Invoice #:22007-002 (21302) Invoice The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Dr. i~' q -(~, ~ Glenmont, NY 12077 Date: ~,~'.,~ ,. ^. ~ Description (518)439-3079 6-May ~'~'[~'1~/~ Reviewed Application Materials 7-May L~'nitial review of application material 7~May Reviewed Application Materials; drafted initial response to Application 21-May Revised initial response to the Application 22-May review, revise & distribute cover letter and report to V~nser 27-May review, revise and distribute report to applicant and Board TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 2,225.00 I, Richard A. Coral, certify that the above account in the amount of $ 2,225.00 is true and correct; that the items, se~,ices and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is actually due. 6/01/10 ~',/~, Date Signature 6/24/2010 $ $ 2,225.00 (Electronic Signature) Hrs Rate: Expenses Amount 1.5 $ 25000 $ 37500 0.9 $ 250.00 $ 225.00 3.8 $ 250.00 $ 950.00 1 1 $ 250.00 $ 275.00 0.9 $ 250.00 $ 225.00 0.7 $ 250.00 $ 175.00 Purchase Order # Date TOWN OF SOUTHOLDO 21302 . March I1, 2010 Tax Exempt · A163§54 B 8020' 4 .500 500 Account # iOeli'ver and s~nd billing to: { i Vendor Department p~NiNG ~q~e Cent, ez fe~ M~mic.~p.at So~ie~s Addre~ ~en~t, ~ 12077 ITEM VENDOR '*Return this copy and Town of Southold veue. her itemized and signed for payment~, DESCRIPTION : UNi'T COST TOTAL NOT TO EXCE~ 18,500.00 THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS NOT VALID, WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE'DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAIEABLE I NTHE~ CHARG~ Dept. Head ~ I CERTIFY ~T~IS TO BE A JUST Sdl~qvlsor - Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher Vendor Tplepbon~ Veadort~.?at~a /D ' ' ~ Invoice Number Date Total ~ endor No. ~heck No. Entered by Audit Date ~own Clerk G~eral t Number Payee Certification Signature_~ ~J[ ~. Department Certification Client: Southold NY Metro PCS 40200 Main Rd. Orient Invoice #:67576-002 <21303) Date: 7-May 7-May 8-May 27-May 28-May 28-May Invoice  _~ ~ The Center for Municipal Solutions ~ ~..',~ 70 Cambridge Dr. IOCC"~"~-'J ~ Glenmont, NY 12077 Description (518)439-3079 Hrs Reviewed Application Materials 1.5 $ initial review of application material 1 2 $ Reviewed Application Materials; drafted initial response to Application 35 $ draft application response 0.7 $ finalize draft and send to Winser 0.6 $ Revised initial response to the Application 0.8 $ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 2,075.00 ~, Richard A. Comi, cer[ify that the above account in the amount of $ 2,075.00 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is actually due. 6/01/10 ~, ~ ~ Date Signature 6/24/2010 Rate: Expenses. Amount 25000 $ 375.00 250.00 $ 300 00 250.00 $ 875~00 250.00 $ 17500 250.00 $ 150.00 250.00 $ 200.00 $ $ 2,075.00 (Electronic Signature) Purchase Order # Date TOWN OF SOUTHOLD~ 2~303 March 15, 2010 Tax Exempt # A163554 B 8020 4 500 500 Account # ptTr and send billing to: rtment PLAR-R~G Address ...! Ve 0, .... 1 Richard ~, Co~ The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Drive Glemmo~t, NY 12077 VENDOR **Return this cepy and Tewn of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment*, iTEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNiT cosT TOTAL I · 5,000,00 I , , ~ ~ ii,. II I ~-,, ~ X?~ ' IJ THIS'~RCH~E ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOU~ THE SIGNATURES DF THE~EPT- HEAD AND THE SUPERVI~R I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE IN THE APPROPRIATION CHARGED ~e~tTHead4~'~- ~ CERT FY THIS TO BE A JUST AND TR : uRCHA RDER Supervisor ~TER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTI~ 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD 518-439-3079 GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX: 518-478-0909 July 7, 2010 (via email and regular mail) Mr. John J. Coughlin Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Re: Southold NY MetroPCS 40200 Main Rd Orient - response to Applicant's letter dated June 21, 2010 - identified as MetroPCS's responses to CMS letter of June 9, 2010 Dear Mr. Coughlin; ~' The items responded to in the above letter are numbered according to our letter of June 9, 2010 to the Applicant and I will comment on the responses in the same fashion. One of the reasons for delay in our response is that you directed your response to the Town, not to us as the Town's consultant. The Town had to send us your response as you did not show us as copied or send us a copy. We would request that future responses be directly to us to assure that the application is not further delayed. General Comments 1 &3.Your letter argues that for the ATT and MetroPCS to be separate applications is unnecessary and inconsistent. It states that the proposals involve the same issues. That is simply not true. One carder needs to be applying for the new facility (pole) and the other carder is applying to co- locate on an existing facility. If the initial carder (ATT) cannot prove the need for the new facility, (in this case what is being requested is an 80' pole) then there would be no facility for the 2nd carrier (MetroPCS) to co-locate on. The issues are certainly not the same. It is also our understanding that the Town has a new wireless code and to state that the town has accepted and processed joint co-applications in the past is not relevant. The Applicant's response to item number 2 is extremely confusing. The checks identified in the Applicants response are the same checks noted in the AT&T response letter. The dates of the checks and whose checks they are (AT&T or MetroPCS) are not stated except for the last check which is MetroPCS. The total claimed to have been paid for both applications, $4,320.00, is far short of the amount ($5500.00) for the two applications which we calculated are the fee costs under the code, not including a total of $100.00 for the Building Permit Application fees (again two applications) for denial. Comments related to the Town Code We disagree with your statement that Mr. Comi does not have the technical expertise to address this issue. CMS, including Mr. Comi, has reviewed thousands of structural drawings and the conclusions in our June 9th letter that the structural information provided in the application was incomplete is correct. In your letter, you agreed that the material provided is incomplete. You state that the information should be provided after zoning approval. We agree that is an appropriate time for such information, however, the structural material presented in the original application was incomplete with no statement, or request, that additional material be presented after zoning. If the applicant wants to request that complete structural information be provided after zoning, if approved, then they should so state their request in the application, which in our opinion would complete this item. However, it is not in our opinion, the prevue of the applicant to tell the Town who should have to review the material, as that is the Town's decision. 2&3. The Applicant states that "In an attempt to deem the Application incomplete Mr. Comi has, determined that MetroPCS must reapply separately for a building permit application, site plan application and special exception permit application." This is simply not true as this is not an attempt to "deem the application incomplete." As stated above, one carrier needs to be applying for the new facility (pole) and the other carrier is applying to co-locate on an existing facility. If the initial carrier (ATT) cannot prove the need for the new facility, (in this case what is being requested is an 80' pole) then there would be no facility for the 2~a carrier (MetroPCS) to co- locate on. The issues are certainly not the same. It is also our understanding that the Town has a new wireless code and to state that the town has accepted and processed joint co-applications in the past is not relevant. The Applicant has not addressed the issues raised in these items. We disagree with your statement that Mr. Comi does not have the technical expertise to address this issue. CMS, including Mr. Comi, has reviewed, testified to, and commented on thousands of radiofrequency engineering propagation maps and issues and the conclusions in our letter that the propagation maps provided in the application are incomplete is correct. This response is the same as the response in the AT&T response letter. (Even though this letter is stated to be a MetroPCS response, the 2~d line of the Applicant's response to this item states "AT&T has complied with the Town Code requirements." Obviously you just "cut and pasted" the same response.) You do not address the proof of need as is required for the Applicant to show. This proof is required using propagation maps and drive test data. We have included forms that have been filled out by MetroPCS on applications in other communities and without complete information we certainly cannot recommend to the Town that MetroPCS has justified the site as proposed. 5. You argue who should review the need for the requested information. The requested information is not provided. It is our contention that the requested information should be provided. We disagree with your statement that "Review of the vicinity plan is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. In our review we noted the following; "the print titled "500'Vicinity Map for the Orient Point Marina (MGH Enterprises)' lists property use and zoning as of December 22, 2009 signed by Matthew Crane, however, the document states the Vicinity Plan was revised on January 11, 2010. Why is there discrepancy between these dates? In addition, the affixed certification is not appropriately executed." You argue that what you have provided is sufficient. You do not address the discrepancies noted in our review. We disagree with your comment that "Again the analysis of the "fall zone" is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. You have again apparently cut and pasted its remarks from the AT&T letter as the responses are identical and we are surprised that a MetroPCS response would be that "the Town directed AT&T to purpose the facility at its present location. This is a perfect example of why the applications need to be separate. If this application was for colocation on an existing pole the setback would be a mute issue. The Applicant states "The analysis of any potential impact on parking is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. We disagree. You have again apparently cut and pasted your remarks from the AT&T letter as the responses are identical. Again, this is a perfect example of why the applications need to be separate. If this application was for colocation on an existing pole the parking would be a mute issue. We disagree with your statement "As to the analysis of site location alternatives, this is again outside the scope of Mr. Comi's expertise. The Applicant needs to prove that the facility they are proposing is required at the location and height they are proposing. Simply stating that "there are no other structures or building in the area of sufficient height to provide the needed coverage" is not proof. The Town needs accurate documentation (propagation maps and drive test data) to determine if this facility is needed at this height at this location. That proof has not been provided. You do not even discuss the building on this property on which the applicant could locate. 10. We disagree with the Applicant's statement "Analysis of the Site Plan requirements is outside of Mr. Comi's expertise. The Applicant has provided additional information in the form of a letter from William F. Collins architects, and we would consider this item complete, unless the Board requires additional site plan information. It is clear that the Applicant has not provided most of the requested information. It is our opinion that the application is incomplete. As we stated in our June 9, 2010, we strongly recommend a conference call with you to go over the comments in this letter, specifically to review what we believe is necessary to complete the application. We invite you to include the individuals that are preparing the technical information propagation maps, drive test, data sheet, tower drawings and calculations to be included in the call. This will help insure the completeness of your next submittal. Please contact me at 518 439- 3079 to establish the date and time for the call. CMS Cc: Town Planning Board (via email and regular mail) Heather Lanza (via email) Martin Finnegan (via email) Kristy Winser (via emil) Denise Benun (via email) 3 C~TER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTI(~!~S 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD 518-439-3079 GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX: 518-478-0909 July 7, 2010 (via email and regular mail) Mr. John J. Coughlin Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Re: Southold NY ATT 40200 Main Rd Orient - response to Applicant's letter dated June 21, 2010 - identified as AT&T's responses to CMS letter of May, 27, 2010 Dear Mr. Coughlin; The items responded to in the above letter are numbered according to our letter of May 27, 2010 to the Applicant and I will comment on the responses in the same fashion. One of the reasons for delay in our response is that you directed your response to the Town, not to us as the Town's consultant. The Town had to send us your response as you did not show us as copied or send us a copy. We would request that future responses be directly to us to assure that the application is not further delayed. General Comments Your letter argues that for the ATT and MetroPCS to be separate applications is unnecessary and inconsistent. It states that the proposals involve the same issues. That is simply not true. One carrier needs to be applying for the new facility (pole) and the other carrier is applying to co- locate on an existing facility. If the initial career (ATT) cannot prove the need for the new facility, (in this case what is being requested is an 80' pole) then there would be no facility for the 2n~l carrier (MetroPCS) to co-locate on. The issues are certainly not the same. It is also our understanding that the Town has a new wireless code and to state that the town has accepted and processed joint co-applications in the past is not relevant. Your response to item number 2 is extremely confusing. You state that this letter is AT&T's response, yet the 4th bullet identifies a MetroPCS check. Is MetroPCS paying fees for one of its competitors? The four checks shown to have been paid are identical in both this letter and the letter claimed to be the MetroPCS response. The total is claimed to have been paid for both applications, $4,320.00, is far short of the amount ($5500.00) for the two applications which we calculated are the fee costs under the code, not including a total of $100.00 for the Building Permit Application fees (again two applications) for denial. Comments related to the Town Code We disagree with your statement that Mr. Comi does not have the technical expertise to address this issue. CMS, including Mr. Comi, has reviewed thousands of structural drawings and the conclusions in our May 27a, letter that the structural information provided in the application was incomplete is correct. In your letter, you agreed that the material provided is incomplete. You state that the information should be provided after zoning approval. We agree that is an appropriate time for such information, however, the structural material presented in the original application was incomplete with no statement, or request, that additional materiaI be presented after zoning. If the applicant wants to request that complete structural information be provided after zoning, if approved, then they should so state their request in the application, which in our opinion would complete this item. However, it is not in our opinion, the pre'ate of the applicant to tell the Town who should have to review the material, as that is the Town's decision. Again we disagree with your statement that Mr. Comi does not have the technical expertise to address this issue. CMS, including Mr. Comi, has reviewed, testified to, and commented on thousands of radiofrequency engineering propagation maps and issues and the conclusions in our letter that the propagation maps provided in the application are incomplete is correct. The Applicant's response is totally unresponsive. You do not address the proof of need as is required for the Applicant to show. This proof is required using propagation maps and drive test data. We have included forms that have been filled out by AT&T on applications in other communities and without complete information, that we do not have, we certainly cannot recommend to the Town that AT&T has justified the site as proposed. Their comment that the space on the pole at 67' is for a separate career just does not fly with us as the antenna stated in the application is the same as the AT&T antennas. It appears to just be space that AT&T would like to save for perhaps their own future use. If our view is accurate, then the facility and AT&T's requested height are not needed. You argue who should review the need for the requested information. The requested information is not provided. It is our contention that the requested information should be provided. The letter from William F. Collins Architects has removed the lighting rod. If the pole, if approved, is constructed without a lighting rod, this item is complete. We disagree with your statement that "Review of the vicinity plan is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. In our review we noted the following; "the print titled "500'Vicinity Map for the Orient Point Marina (MGH Enterprises)' lists property use and zoning as of December 22, 2009 signed by Matthew Crane, however, the document states the Vicinity Plan was revised on January 11, 2010. Why is there discrepancy between these dates? In addition, the affixed certification is not appropriately executed." You argue that what you have provided is sufficient. You do not address the discrepancies noted in our review. We disagree with your comment that "Again the analysis of the "fall zone" is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. We are unaware of anyone from the Town directing AT&T to purpose the facility at its present location as stated in the Applicant's response. If such direction was given we would request by whom, when and in reference to what. In other words did it take setback into consideration? The Applicant does not answer the setback issue. What they say they will comply with are in regard to construction and safety, not setback. There has been no request to waive the setback requirement in the code. Is the applicant going to request such? The Applicant states "The analysis of any potential impact on parking is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. We disagree. The applicant has not addressed our concerns. Simply stating that the facility will not be taking up any parking spaces does not address the issue that the fall zone of the facility will encroach upon the parking area. The Applicant has not addressed this issue. We disagree with your statement "As to the analysis of site location alternatives, this is again outside the scope of Mr. Comi's expertise. The Applicant needs to prove that the facility they are proposing is required at the location and height they are proposing. Simply stating that "them are no other structures or building in the area of sufficient height to provide the needed coverage" is not proof. The Town needs accurate documentation (propagation maps and drive test data) to 2 determine if this facility is needed at this height at this location. That proof has not been provided. You do not even discuss the building on this property on which the applicant could locate which would eliminate any setback or parking issues. Concerning the issue of future co-locators, although the code does not state that the number must be provided, it can be easily assumed that if these carriers cannot go lower then other carriers would also not be able to go lower and thus the pole is designed for no additional carriers. The structural information provided notes a space at 67' feet for a future carrier, however, as we stated previously in this letter that just does not fly with us as the antenna stated in the application is the same as the AT&T antennas, and looks to be for AT&T, not a future carder. Beyond that there is nothing in the structural design for any additional carriers. The Applicant states that an inventory is not required under the Town Code. The Planning Board does have the authority under section 280-74(D)(1)d. to have the Applicant provide "Other information deemed by the Planning Board to be necessary to assess compliance with this law." We would like to see an inventory and will recommend to the Board that they request one. 10. The Applicant's comment that there is no Sechon 280-74(D)(8) is correct. It was a typo on our part as it should have been Section 280-74(D)(4). All of the other comments by the Applicant are incorrect. As the Town Code states in Section 280-74(D)(4) "The applicant shall also provide evidence supporting the existence of inadequate service. This may include the propagation maps cited above, drive test maps, traffic studies, customer complaint logs and similar data." We have asked for proof of need, per code reqUirements, that the Applicant substantiate what they have requested and they have not provided the data. Moreover the comment by the Applicant that this "proposal is one for collocation, between two carriers" in just not accurate. It is for a new pole. In addition, the Applicant is inaccurate when they state "the Town Code does not require the submission of drive test maps, traffic studies, and customer complaint logs", 11. We disagree with your statement "Analysis of the Site Plan requirements is outside of Mr. Comi's expertise. The Applicant has provided additional information in the form of a letter from William F. Collins architects, and we would consider this item complete, unless the Board requires additional site plan information. It is clear that the Applicant has not provided most of the requested information. It is our opinion that the application is incomplete. As we stated in our May 27, 2010, we strongly recommend a conference call with you to go over the comments in this letter, specifically to review what we believe is necessary to complete the application. We invite you to include the individuals that are preparing the technical information propagation maps, drive test, data sheet, tower drawings and calculations to be included in the call. This will help insure the completeness of your next submittal. Please contact me at 518 439- 3079 to establish the date and time for the call. CMS Attachment Cc: Town Planning Board (via emaiI and regular mail) Heather Lanza (via email) Martin Finnegan (via email) Kristy Winser (via email) Denise Benun (via email) RI , NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW T~LEPHON~g: (O131) 425-41OO F~.CSliVlILIg: (681) 425-4104 June 21,2010 BY HAND Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 JUN 21 2010 RE: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Construction of a Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: Orient by the Sea Marina 40200 Main Road (Route 25) Orient, New York SCTM#: 1000-15-9-8.1 Dear Ms. Winser: As you are aware, we are the attorneys for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ('AT&T') and MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned matter. We are in receipt of the June 9, 2010 correspondence of Richard A. Comi with regard to this matter (copy attached hereto). This correspondence shall serve as MetroPCS' response to same. General Comments: l&3. Mr. Comi states that he deems the applications of AT&T and MetroPCS to be separate applications. To do so is both unnecessary and inconsistent with the provisions of the Southold Town Code. AT&T and MetroPCS are proposing to erect a telecommunications pole on which they each will affix antennas; the proposals involve the same issues. Moreover, the Town has already accepted and processed this joint application as well as other joint co-applications in the past. Indeed, there is nothing in the Town Code that prohibits co-applications. The following checks have been filed in connection with this proposal: ,, Shore 2 Shore Wireless, Inc. Check No. 1894, in the amount of $50.00, · Town of Southold Planning B~rd Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications June 21,2010 Page 2 of 4 which sum represented the Building Permit Application fee for denial; Shore 2 Shore Wireless, Inc. Check No. 1893 in the amount of $750.00, which sum represented the Building Permit Application fee for a new facility, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(1)(b); · DGCR, LLC Check Number 4476 in the amount of $2,520.00, which sum represented the Site Plan Application fee at the time of the initial submission of the proposal in July 2006. Said amount exceeds the current Site Plan Application fee amount of $2,000.00 for a new facility, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(2)(b); and · MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4364 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the Special Exception Application fee, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(3). A total of $4,320.00 has been submitted with respect to application fees for the Building and Planning Departments for this proposal, exceeding the required $3,750.00 provided in the Town's current Code. Comments related to the Town Code: 2&3. Mr. Comi asserts that the written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance is not satisfactory because it does not address the foundation of the structure, the soil and/or overall calculations. We question whether Mr. Comi has the technical expertise to review structural drawings. More importantly, there is nothing in the Southold Town Code that states that a zoning application is incomplete if foundation and soil calculations do not accompany the structural drawings filed with the zoning application. A more prudent approach would be to file such documentation with the Building Department after zoning approval inasmuch as the design and/or location of the proposed site may be changed pursuant to recommendations made by the approving board or conditions attached to such approval. The applicants recognize that the proposed pole must be designed to meet all requirements set forth in the New York State Building Code and will do so. The time for such review should be prior to issuance of the Building Permit and these drawings and calculations should be reviewed by the Building Department of the Town of Southold, which is well qualified to perform a review at that time. In an attempt to deem the application incomplete Mr. Comi has, determined that MetroPCS must reapply separately for a building permit application, site plan application and special exception permit application. This position is not supported by any section of the Southold Town Code and would simply serve to further delay the instant applications. Moreover, the Town has accepted the joint application in this case and has accepted similar joint applications in the past. As to questions regarding the radiofrequency engineering materials submitted in support of the application, AT&T has complied with the Town Code requirements. Mr. Od Town of Southold Planning Boar Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications June 21,2010 Page 3 of 4 10. Comi asserts that the propagation maps provided are incomplete. In an effort to make it appear that the filing is somehow deficient or incomplete, Mr. Comi confuses what is required for filing and what the Town may request in reviewing the proposal. Furthermore, we note that Mr. Comi's comments are inconsistent with the Town Code. The Town Code at Section 280-74B(1)(d) requires that an applicant submit propagation maps depicting three signal strengths (-75dBm, -85dBm, and -95dBm). The Town Code does not support Mr. Comi's comments regarding signal strength. Additionally, as noted in the drawings, there is a separate future carder that intends to locate at 67' AGL on the proposed pole if the pole is approved. If questions regarding the radiofrequency engineering support for the site remain, they can be addressed at a public heating and not as part of an extended pre-hearing question and answer session. Finally it should be noted that the applicants do not agree that Mr. Comi has the required technical expertise to review and comment on radiofrequency engineering propagation maps and issues. While Section 280-74B(1)(g) requires that the applicant file a copy of the deed or lease agreement establishing the applicant's right to use the parcel on which the proposed facility is to be located, it does not require the filing of a legal description or memorandum of lease. In addition, the applicants question whether the Town has need for technical assistance in reviewing this simple filing requirement. We submit that the Town Planning Department and Town Attorney's office have more expertise in this area than Mr. Comi. Review of the vicinity plan is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. Any perceived discrepancy with regard to the dates thereon is related to the review, revision and formatting of the document. Additionally, the Town Code does not require the submission of a Vicinity Plan per se. Moreover, the Vicinity Plan that was submitted is signed and sealed and contains the information requested in Town Code Sections 280- 74C(4) and 280-74C(9). The Vicinity Plan also provides the names of owners within 500 feet and the locations, names and widths of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines complying with Site Plan Checklist requirements. Again the analysis of the "fall zone" is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. That said, the proposal will comply with the New York State Building Code and all other applicable codes with regard to construction and safety. Additionally, the Town directed AT&T to propose the facility at its present location. The analysis of any potential impact on parking is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. Furthermore, the proposed facility will not be taking up any parking spaces at the premises. As to the analysis of site location alternatives, this is again outside the scope of Mr. Comi's expertise. The materials submitted in support of the applications clearly state that there are no other structures or buildings in the area of a sufficient height to provide the needed coverage. Analysis of the Site Plan requirements is outside Mr. Comi's expertise. The Town Planning Department is well qualified to review the sufficiency of site plans and surveys and has greater expertise to do so than Mr. Comi. The surveys are clearly Town of Southold Planning B'~rd Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications June 21. 2010 Page 4 of 4 dated July 2, 2009. Proposed landscaping is clearly shown on the plans. Two sets of construction drawings, prepared by W.F. Collins, dated July 29, 2009, are submitted under separate cover to provide architectural review materials. No signage is proposed. With respect to grading and drainage, please see the letter of W.F. Collins dated June 17,2010, submitted with AT&T's response submission. In addition, the applicants object to the Town's retention of Mr. Comi's firm to the extent that such retention further delays the processing and review of this application. Furthermore, the applicants dispute Mr. Comi's qualifications to serve as a technical expert. To the extent he offers comment on issues outside his area of expertise, if any, said comments are inappropriate. The applicants do not consent to the application of any funds in escrow for the payment of fees to Mr. Comi or any technical consultant until a detailed invoice for technical consultant services is provided to us and it is determined that the services provided are reasonable and that the services provided actually involved technical services outside the scope and capabilities of the Town's well qualified Planning and Building Department staff. Notwithstanding comments to the contrary, the applications are complete, and we respectfully request that the Public Heatings be scheduled immediately consistent with Federal and State law. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHL1N, LLP By: ~ Coughlin JJC:mk Encls. R~, NIELSEN, HUBER 8,: GOUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW (631) 42 fl-4.100 (6131) 425-4104 June 21, 2010 BY HAND Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: JUN 21 2010 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Construction of a Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: Orient by the Sea Marina 40200 Main Road (Route 25) Orient, New York SCTM#: 1000-15-9-8.1 Dear Ms. Winser: As you are aware, we are the attorneys for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ('AT&T') and MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned matter. We are in receipt of the May 27, 2010 correspondence of Richard A. Comi with regard to this matter (copy attached hereto). This correspondence shall serve as AT&T's response to same. General Comments: 1. Mr. Comi states that he deems the applications of AT&T and MetroPCS to be separate applications. To do so is both unnecessary and inconsistent with the provisions of the Southold Town Code. AT&T and MetroPCS are proposing to erect a telecommunications pole on which they each will affix antennas; the proposals involve the same issues. Moreover, the Town has already accepted and processed this joint application as well as other joint co-applications in the past. Indeed, there is nothing in the Town Code that prohibits co-applications. 2. The following checks have been filed in connection with this proposal: · Shore 2 Shore Wireless, Inc. Check No. 1894, in the amount of $50.00, which sum represented the Building Permit Application fee for denial; · Shore 2 Shore Wireless, Inc. Check No. 1893 in the amount of $750.00, which Town of Southold Planning Boar Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications June 21,2010 Page 2 of 4 sum represented the Building Permit Application fee for a new facility, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(1 )(b); · DGCR, LLC Check Number 4476 in the amount of $2,520.00, which sum represented the Site Plan Application fee at the time of the initial submission of the proposal in July 2006. Said amount exceeds the current Site Plan Application fee amount of $2,000.00 for a new facility, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(2)(b); and · MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4364 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the Special Exception Application fee, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(3). A total of $4,320.00 has been submitted with respect to application fees for the Building and Planning Departments for this proposal, exceeding the required $3,750.00 provided in the Town's current Code. Comments related to the Town Code: 1. Mr. Comi asserts that the written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance is not satisfactory because it does not address the foundation of the structure, the soil and/or overall calculations. We question whether Mr. Comi has the technical expertise to review structural drawings. More importantly, there is nothing in the Southold Town Code that states that a zoning application is incomplete if foundation and soil calculations do not accompany the structural drawings filed with the zoning application. A more prudent approach would be to file such documentation with the Building Department after zoning approval inasmuch as the design and/or location of the proposed site may be changed pursuant to recommendations made by the approving board or conditions attached to such approval. The applicants recognize that the proposed pole must be designed to meet all requirements set forth in the New York State Building Code and will do so. The time for such review should be prior to issuance of the Building Permit and these drawings and calculations should be reviewed by the Building Department of the Town of Southold, which is well qualified to perform a review at that time. 2. As to questions regarding the radiofrequency engineering materials submitted in support of the application, AT&T has complied with the Town Code requirements. Mr. Comi asserts that the propagation maps provided are incomplete. In an effort to make it appear that the filing is somehow deficient or incomplete, Mr. Comi confuses what is required for filing and what the Town may request in reviewing the proposal. Furthermore, we note that Mr. Comi's comments are inconsistent with the Town Code. The Town Code at Section 280- 74B(1)(d) requires that an applicant submit propagation maps depicting three signal strengths (-75dBm, -85dBm, and -95dBm). The Town Code does not support Mr. Comi's comments regarding signal strength. Additionally, as noted in the drawings, there is a separate future carrier that intends to locate at 67' AGL on the proposed pole if the pole is approved. If questions regarding the radiofrequency engineering support for the site remain, they can be Town of Southold Planning B6~rd Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications June 21, 2010 Page 3 of 4 addressed at a public hearing and not as part of an extended pre-hearing question and answer session. Finally it should be noted that the applicants do not agree that Mr. Comi has the required technical expertise to review and comment on radiofrequency engineering propagation maps and issues. 3. While Section 280-74B(1)(g) requires that the applicant file a copy of the deed or lease agreement establishing the applicant's right to use the parcel on which the proposed facility is to be located, it does not require the filing of a legal description or memorandum of lease. in addition, the applicants question whether the Town has need for technical assistance in reviewing this simple filing requirement. We submit that the Town Planning Department and Town Attorney's office have more expertise in this area than Mr. Comi. There is no lightning rod at this site. The letter of W.F. Collins to which Mr. Comi refers, has been amended to delete reference to a lightning rod and is submitted herewith. Review of the vicinity plan is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. Any perceived discrepancy with regard to the dates thereon is related to the review, revision and formatting of the document. Additionally, the Town Code does not require the submission of a Vicinity Plan per se. Moreover, the Vicinity Plan that was submitted is signed and sealed and contains the information requested in Town Code Sections 280-74C(4) and 280-74C(9). The Vicinity Plan also provides the names of owners within 500 feet and the locations, names and widths of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines complying with Site Plan Checklist requirements. Again the analysis of the "fall zone" is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. That said, the proposal will comply with the New York State Building Code and all other applicable codes with regard to construction and safety. Additionally, the Town directed AT&T to propose the facility at its present location. The analysis of any potential impact on parking is outside the area of Mr. Comi's expertise. Furthermore, the proposed facility will not be taking up any parking spaces at the premises. As to the analysis of site location alternatives, this is again outside the scope of Mr. Comi's expertise. The materials submitted in support of the applications clearly state that there are no other structures or buildings in the area of a sufficient height to provide the needed coverage. Furthermore, the materials submitted show that the proposed facility is available for additional collocation. The Town Code does not require that an applicant specify the number of possible future antennas. An inventory of existing wireless facilities is not required under the current version of the Code. Perhaps Mr. Comi is working with one of the previous versions of Article XVII of the Southold Town Code. 10. Mr. Comi cites Section "280-74(D)(8)". There is no such section. Moreover, communication with another carrier is irrelevant in this instance, as the proposal is one for collocation, between two carriers. Additionally, the Town Code does not require the submission of drive test maps, traffic studies, and customer complaint logs. 11. Analysis of the Site Plan requirements is outside Mr. Comi's expertise. The Town Planning Department is well qualified to review the sufficiency of site plans and surveys and has greater expertise to do so than Mr. Comi. The surveys are clearly dated July 2, 2009. Proposed landscaping is clearly shown on the plans. Two sets of construction drawings, Town of Southold Planning Board Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications June 21,2010 Page 4 of 4 prepared by W.F. Collins, dated July 29, 2009, are submitted herewith to provide architectural review materials. No signage is proposed. With respect to grading and drainage, please see the letter of W.F. Collins dated June 17, 2010, submitted herewith. In addition, the applicants object to the Town's retention of Mr. Comi's firm to the extent that such retention further delays the processing and review of this application. Furthermore, the applicants dispute Mr. Comi's qualifications to serve as a technical expert. To the extent he offers comment on issues outside his area of expertise, if any, said comments are inappropriate. The applicants do not consent to the application of any funds in escrow for the payment of fees to Mr. Comi or any technical consultant until a detailed invoice for technical consultant services is provided to us and it is determined that the services provided are reasonable and that the services provided actually involved technical services outside the scope and capabilities of the Town's well qualified Planning and Building Department staff. Notwithstanding comments to the contrary, the applications are complete, and we respectfully request that the Public Hearings be scheduled immediately consistent with Federal and State law. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHL1N, LLP (--_ -*'~-Jbhn J./~qSughlin JJC:mk Encls. June 17,2010 Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairperson, Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Structural Verification of Proposed 80 R AGL RFC Monopole New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC # NYCENY1059/LI-1059 and metroPCS Wireless, Inc. # NY7320 Orient By The Sea Restaurant 40200Main Road Orient Point, NY 11957 WFC Project # 05-6478 Dear Mr. Sidor: WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R( n II'ECTS, I I P William F. Collins, AIA S~even R. Saraniero, AIA, LEED AP Nell A. MacDonald, AIA, LEED AP Associate Paul lC Gartelmann, AIA, LEED AP 2010 On behalf of New Cingular Wireless, LLC and metroPCS Wireless, Inc.; William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP (WFC) concurs that the proposed 80'-0" AGL Monopole for the above referenced site shall be designed by the manufacturer to conform with all State and Local Codes, Telecommunications Industry Association / Electronics Industry Association (TIA/EIA) Standard 222-F and Manual of Steel Construction, for the following design wind velocities: 120 mph 3-second gust with no ice 50 mph 3-second gust with 0.75 inch radial ice 60 mph (Operational) 3-second gust without ice Structure Class II (Importance Factor = 1.00) Topographic Category 1 Exposure Category "C" Proposed monopole loading is as follows: 3- AT&T Mobility - Kathrein # 800-10121 Antennas mounted within pole ~ 77'-0" AGL, Rad. Cntr. 3- Future Carrier - Kathrein # 800-10121 Antennas mounted within pole ~ 67'-0" AGL, Rad. Cntr. 3- metroPCS - Kathrein - Werke KG # 800-10504 Antennas mounted within pole @ 57'-0" AGL, Rad. Cntr. All antenna feeder cables will be routed within the pole. We trust the above is clear and as complete as necessary for this purpose. Regards, d I'11:631 689-8450 June 17, 2010 Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairperson, Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Grading and Drainage Response Letter New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC # NYCENY 1059/L1-1059 and metroPCS Wireless, Inc. # NY7320 Orient By The Sea Restaurant 40200Main Road Orient Point, NY 11957 WFC Project # 05-6478 WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA Dear Mr. Sidor: On behalf of New Cingular Wireless, LLC and metroPCS Wireless, Inc.; William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP (WFC) offers the following response in reference to Comment No. 11 (Grading and drainage plan with calculations) of Mr. Richard A. Comi's "Statement of Incomplete Application" letter dated May 27, 2010. The existing native soil in the areas of the proposed New Cingular Wireless and metroPCS equipment areas is perwous and comprised of sand and gravel and would not pose a drainage problem. The proposed elevated equipment platforms will have open serrated grating as decking which will allow for precipitation to pass through. As stated on the construction documents submitted concurrently the proposed equipment areas are to be mildly re-graded such that it is relatively level with the adjacent existing surrounding areas. No retaining walls or radical changes in surface features or runoff are proposed. We trust the above is clear and,~,as necessary for this purpose. Nell A. MacDonald Partner ,X?.,--- -~- ' ',. /o5 June 9, 2010 C~TER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIO~ 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD 518439-3079 GLENMONT, NEW YOP,~ 12077 FAX: 518-478 0909 (via email and regular mail) Mr. John J. Coughlin Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 26 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Re: Southold NY MetroPCS 40200 Main Rd Orient Dear Mr. Coughlin; We have reviewed the above referenced application received with cover letter dated January 14, 2010. For reasons we set forth below, we find that the application is incomplete in accordance the Wireless Facilities Statute for the Town of Southold ("Wireless Facility Statute"). We have three general comments; 1) We deem the New Cingular application at the same site to be a separate application thus feedback thereto has been sent under separate cover. 2) In accordance with section 280-74 of the Town's Code, MetroPCS should have submitted $2750 in connection with its application herewith. However, the only fee information pertaining to this application received by us is a copy of a check (g4364) made out to the Town for $1,000.00 $2520.00. The fee discrepancy associated with the application needs to be resolved. 3) AIl of the documents needed for a co-location must be part of the MetroPCS application, not merely included as part of a "co-application". Our comments related to sections of the code are as follows; 1) §280-74(B) (1) (b) requires written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance with applicable laws. As a co-locator on a proposed tower, the structural requirements under the code need to be contained in the MetroPCS application. To this end, the applicant provided William F. Collins, AIA, letter dated August 7, 2009, documenting the proposed facility's structural compliance with applicable law ("Collins' Letter"). The Collins' Letter is not satisfactory structural verification because it does not address the foundation of the structure, the soil and/or the overall calculations. Soils, foundation and structural calculations need to be provided to ensure strucmral compliance. 2) §280-74 (B) (i) (a) requires written analysis demonstrating the project complies with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations in accordance with §280-70 (Radio emissions). We find the information provided to be insufficient. 3) Consistent with previous comments a special exception application requires a complete building permit application and a site plan application. Since MetroPCS applied on the same application as New Cingular such material for MetroPCS is incomplete. 4) §280-74(B)(1)(d) & (e) requires propagation maps for existing surrounding and/or approve sites, coverage from all alternatives sites considered and coverage from proposed sites and a gap map prepared and signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer and overlaid on an existing coverage. The propagation maps provided are incomplete as follows: Mr. Balzano, in his affidavit dated October 29, 2009, provided signal strengths that he claims are required by MetroPCS for in-building commercial, in-building residential and in-vehicle reliable service. We agree with his signal strengths. What we do not see is what ERP was imput into the propagation model. (See attached Propagation Study Requirements and Propagation Data Study sheet). The area of coverage surrounding the proposed site is comprised of buildings three stories high or less. They are mostly residential homes for which we believe that -85dBm will provide reliable in building coverage (With -95dBm providing reliable in-vehicle coverage). Therefore we do not understand the reason for map 3, m-building commercial. The Pinnacle Telecom Group, FCC MPE Compliance and Assessment and Report, provides that MetroPCS New York, LLC is proposing an antenna centerline height of 57 feet AGL. Why is a height of 57 feet AGL required? There are very few trees in the vicinity of the proposed site. What dBm loss was used in the propagation model for trees or clutter? We require new propagation maps utilizing the ERP as calculated on the Propagation data sheet done at -85dBm and -95dBm. We would also like to see maps done at a 10 foot less height. (47 feet AGL) with an explanation of how and where any reduction occurs. Has a drive test been conducted? Can we get a CW drive test of the area at varying heights? Ifa drive test has been conducted, can we get a copy showing the signal strength in order to validate the propagation maps and a narrative of how the drive test has been utilized to validate the propagation maps? We are aware that MetroPCS is proposing additional sites in Southold. Why are no sites shown on the propagation maps? 5) §280-74(B) (1) (g) requires a copy of the deed or lease agreement. We have no lease agreement allowing MetroPCS to go on the monopole, if permitted. In addition, the lease with MGH; i) has not been properly notarized; ii) Exhibit A and Exhibit B Description of the Lessor's Real Property and Description of Premises, respectively are not properly dated; and iii) Exhibit C the Memorandum of Agreement has not been completed and/or executed. 6) §280-74(C)(4)-Vicinity Plan the print titled "500'Vicinity Map for the Orient Point Marina (MGH Enterprises)' lists property use and zoning as of December 22, 2009 signed by Matthew Crane, however, the document states the Vicinity Plan was revised on January 11, 2010. Why is there discrepancy between these dates? In addition, the affixed certification is not appropriately executed. 7) §280-74(C); (1 l~Fall zone Radius and distance - The code requires a fall zone radius that is twice the height of the structure. The prints show the proposed tower to be approximately twenty (20) feet from the property line (the adjacent property is the Orient Beach State Park, which an area where people congregate). Even using "break point design" for the tower, we do not see how the setback requirement could be met as the "break point" would need to be in the upper ten (10) feet of the structure where the antennas are located. How do you address this requirement? As a co-locator with an antenna centerline of 57 feet AGL, your antennas do not meet the setback requirements. 8) In order to receive site plan approval under the Wireless Facility Statute, §280-72 requires that the antenna support structure to be sited on developed commercial or industrial properties shall not encroach on parking areas. We call this particular requirement to your attention because from our site visit as well as the plans the antenna support structure will be occupying, and the fall zone will cover a good portion of the current parking area designated to the Orient by the Sea. We require further information by Applicant addressing this issue. Although MetroPCS is a co-locator, their height at 57 feet AGL impacts the parking. We require further information by Applicant addressing this issue. 9) §280-74(D) (1) (c) & (2) Applicant does not meet the requirements set forth in such sections because the applicant has failed to submit a complete written site location alternative analysis. It only has provided an Affidavit, sworn to by Doug Hall on October 9, 2009, prepared for both New Cingular and MetroPCS stating that the carrier radio frequency engineers determined that none of the existing buildings or structures lying in the subject area would be suitable for a facility that would be capable of eliminating the coverage gap in the area, however, such affidavit does not described in any detail the locations of the existing alternatives, the availability of those sites and the reasons such sites would not meet the applicant's service or engineering needs. There is a building at the proposed site and there has been no discussion as to why a structure containing the applicants could not go on the rooftop of the building. This would eliminate a number of the concerns raised in this report (including without limitation, the fall zone and interference with parking). 10) Pursuant to §280-133 and the Site Plan Application Checklist the following items are missing and/or incomplete for the application: Property surveys (deficiency described in 7; and the survey submitted are not clearly identified as to date of the revision); Grading and drainage plan with calculations; · Proposed landscape plan; · Architectural review materials; and · Scaled sketch of sign showing color, material type and sign lighting details; Until you provide the required information as noted above, we are unable to make our recommendation to the Town that the application is complete. We strongly recommend a conference call with you to go over the comments in this letter, specifically to review what we believe is necessary to complete the application. We invite you to include the individuals that are preparing the technical information propagation maps, drive test, data sheet, tower drawings and calculations to be included in the call. This will help insure the completeness of your next submittal. Please contact Denise Benun at 212 921-5527 to establish the date and time for the call. Sincerely, R. /X. ComJ_ (electronic signature) Richard A. Comi CMS cc: Town Planning Board (via email and regular mail) Denise Benun (via email) Propagation Study Requirements Propagation studies are required with the application to prove the need for any new tower site, or co-location on any existing structure ~vhere there is an increase in the height of the structure or any modification where there is an increase in the height of the antenna(s) on the structure.. (If service at the site is proposed for the cellular frequency band (800 900 MHz), even if the site will also utilize other frequencies, the studies need to be done at the cellular fi'equency band.) For a new tower or where there would be an increase the height of the existing tower or other structure, two propagation studies are required; one are the proposed height and another set of studies at 10' lower, unless something different is otherwise agreed to at the pre-application meeting.(Along with the lower propagation study should be a narrative that describes why the lower height is not sufficient) If the application is for co-locating on an existing tower or other structure without increasing the height of the existing tower or structure, then propagation studies are only required at the height proposed by the applicant. Legend: Propagation studies are to include a legend on each sheet showing the following at a minimum: 1) a scale of miles or distance of no smaller than 1" to 1/2 mile; and 2) color coded of signal strength designations at -101dBm for "on-street" service, -95 bBm for "in-vehicle" service and -85 dBm for "in-building" service (except in urban areas where it can be demonstrated that there are several four story or larger buildings in the proposed coverage area). It is preferable that Propagation studies be provided on clear acetate sheets so that they may be overlaid and more easily read individually or in conjunction with each other, as may be necessary for proper analysis. A base map of the community on which to overlay the propagation study is needed that must show and identify the major roads in the intended service area. For any proposed site located less than 2 miles from a community's boundary, the boundary must be shown on the map. The base map must be the same scale as the overlay propagation maps. Note: Only signal strengths of-101dBm for "on-street" service, 795 dBm for In-Vehicle service and -85 dBm for In-Building service wiIl be considered in the context of the need for the facility and the need for the requested height, unless the facility is intended to serve an urban market. This is based on the accepted losses inherent with each situation and the ability of the hand unit to function normally at -106 dBm. Note: The Applicant must state whether the proposed faciliw design i_s for in-vehicle coverage (-95 dBm) or in- building coverage (-85 dBm). If an applicant believes it needs different signal strength levels, such must be justified in sufficient detail to allow verification of the technological need, such as a statement or explanation by the phone manufacturer or the carrier that greater signal strengths are needed and why lesser signal strengths will not permit the handset to function as designed or certain services to be provided in a functional context. Note that the local regulatory body is not required to grant an applicant's "best case" or most desired situation, but rather what will enable the handset to function as designed and the service to be reliable. Note: Propagation studies must be accompanied by all modeling information used to produce them (using the provided "Data Sheet for Propagation Study" form), including, but not limited to the ERP (Effective Radiated Power) from the site/facility that is the subject of the application and all adiacent sites/facih'ties and the cut sheets from all equipment showing the operating characteristics, such as, for purposes of example: tn The power of the radios stated in walls Cl The gains and losses from each component of all equipment The Center rot M~unicipal Solutions // I Propagation Stud, Data Sheet for Proposed Facility Applicant: Name/title person completing form: ProPosed Site Name; Site Address:' Instructions: Complete this form, attach radio and antenna spec sheets and include with the RF P~'pagation Study. All nearby sites (adj~ ,roviding coverage in and near the proposed site are to be included in the study. Use an additional form if more than 3 sites Line No. ITEM UNIT Proposed site Adjacent site #1 Adjacent site #2 Adjacent site Data Data Data GENERAL iNFO: #1 Site Name #2 Site Address #3 Tower or structure height feet ~ Antenna mounting height agl feet #5 Network Technology #6 Operating Frequency MgHz #7 Base Station Manufacturer #8 Base Station Model Cf #9 Radio Max Power Watts #10 Is pilot channel used for propagation (yes or no) fll 1 If yes, pilot channel power Watts min. 20% of power) #12 Convert Power to dBm dBm #13 Losses: # 14 is there a combiner #15 If yes make and model #16 If yes, combiner loss dB #17 Cable losses: #18 Cable diameter In. #19 Cable Igth. From antenna to Ft equipment #20 Cable loss per 100 ft. dB #21 Calculated loss dB #22 Connectors #23 Number of connectors #24 Loss per connector dB #25 Calculated Loss dB #26 Jumpers: #27 Number of jumpers #28 Loss per jumpel dB #29 Calculated loss dB #30 total calculated loss: dB #31 Gains: #32 s there an in line amplifier #33 If yes, gain dB #34 ~,ntenna Mftg. #35 ~ntenna Model # #36 ~.ntenna gain dB #37 Total gain: dB #38 Result: dBm #39 ]'ransmission Power M0 --RP Watts To Calculate ERP (Line M0) of an Antenna: Step #1: Insert the radio power in Watts in line 9 and pilot power, if applicable in Line 11. Step #2: Convert the radio power or pilot power, as applicable, into dBm units. Insert the result into Line #12 Step #3: Add all dB losses: Line #16 + Line #21+ Line #25 + Line #29; Insert the result into Line #30 Step #4: Add all dB gains: Line #33 + Line #36; Insert the result into Line #37 Step $5: Add Line #37 to Line #12. Subtract from the result, Line #30. Insert the result into Line #39. Step #6: Convert the number in Line #39 into Watts. Record the result in Line #40. May 27, 2010 518-439-3079 CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX: 518 478-0909 (via email and regular mail Mr. John J. Coughlin Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Re: Southold NY ATT 40200 Main Rd Orient Dear Mr. Coughlin; We have reviewed the above referenced application received with cover letter dated January 14, 2010. For reasons we set forth below, we find that the application is incomplete in accordance the Wireless Facilities Statute for the Town of Southold ("Wireless Facility Statute"). We have two general comments; 1 ) We deem the MetroPCS New York, LLC co-location application to be a separate application thus feedback thereto will be sent under separate cover. 2) In accordance with section 280-74 of the Town's Code, New Cingular should have submitted $3750 in connection with its application herewith. However, the only fee information pertaining to this application received by us is a copy of a nondescript check for $2520.00. Assuming the check is indeed from New Cingnlar, the fee discrepancy associated with the application. Needs to be resolved. Our comments related to sections of the code are as follows; 1) §280-74(B) (1) (b) requires written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance with applicable laws. To this end, the applicant provided William F. Collins, AIA, letter dated August 7, 2009, documenting the proposed facility's structural compliance with applicable law ("Collins' Letter"). The Collins' Letter is not satisfactory structural verification because it does not address the foundation of the structure, the soil and/or the overall calculations. Soils, foundation and structural calculations need to be provided to ensure structural compliance. 2) §280-74(B)(1)(d) & (e) requires propagation maps for existing surrounding and/or approve sites, coverage from all alternatives sites considered and coverage from proposed sites and a gap map prepared and signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer and overlaid on an existing coverage. The propagation maps provided are incomplete as follows: There is no signal strength provided on the maps. Mr. Guillabert, in his affidavit dated October 26, 2009, provided signal strengths that he claims are required by Cingular for in-building, in- vehicle and on street reliable service. We disagree with his signal strengths. (See attached Propagation Study Requirements and Propagation Data Study sheet). The area of coverage surrounding the proposed site is comprised of buildings three stories high or less. They are mostly residential homes for which we believe that -85dBm will provide reliable 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) in building coverage Oh -95dBm providing reliable in-vehicle.~-c~rage)' If New Cingular Wireless believes that ~fSey require stronger signal level they need to provide detailed proof as to why such signal strength is required. In addition, the Pinnacle Telecom Group, FCC MPE Compliance and Assessment and Report, provides that New Cingular is proposing an antenna centefline height of 77 feet AGL and MetroPCS New York, LLC is proposing an antenna centefline height of 57 feet AGL. Why is there 20 feet between the two applicants? The Collins' Letter provides for a future carrier at 67 feet AGL using the same Kathrein # 800-10121 Antenna giving the impression that New Cingular has plans to expand downwards, thus if67 feet AGL is a sufficient height to meet its claimed gap coverage why does this application propose an 80 foot AGL tower'? We require new propagation maps utilizing the ERP as calculated on the Propagation data sheet done at -85dBm and -95dBm. We also require the most recent drive test of the Town showing the signal strength in order to validate the propagation maps and a narrative of how the drive test has been utilized to validate the propagation maps. §280-74(B) (1) (g) requires a copy of the deed or lease agreement. We find the lease to be incomplete for the following reasons: i) the corporate acknowledgment is blank; ii) Exhibit 1 Description of the Premise does not contain a legal description and is not dated; and iii) the Memorandum of Agreement is missing. §280-74(C) (2) provides for an aeronautical study or appropriate consultant's report demonstrating that the proposed facility will not interfere with air navigation. The Aeronautical study and the FAA Notice Criteria Tool as provided assumes an 80 foot structure, however, the Collins' Letter states that the applicant is proposing an eight (8) foot Lighting Rod ~ 80'-0 AGL, thus invalidating the aeronautical study and the FAA Notice Criteria Tool. How do you intend to address this issue? §280-74(C)(4)-Vicinity Plan the print titled "500'Vicinity Map for the Orient Point Marina (MGH Enterprises)' lists property use and zoning as of December 22, 2009 signed by Matthew Crane, however, the document states the Vicinity Plan was revised on January 11, 2010. Why is there discrepancy between these dates? In addition, the affixed certification is not appropriately executed. §280-74(C); (11)--Fall zone Radius and distance The code requires a fall zone radius that is twice the height of the structure. The prints show the proposed tower to be approximately twenty (20) feet from the property line (the adjacent property is the Orient Beach State Park, which an area where people congregate). Even using "break point design" for the tower, we do not see how the setback requirement could be met as the "break point" would need to be in the upper ten (10) feet of the structure where the antennas are located. How do you address this requirement? In order to receive site plan approval under the Wireless Facility Statute, {}280-72 requires that the antenna support structure to be sited on developed commercial or industrial properties shall not encroach on parking areas. We call this particular requirement to your attention because from our site visit as well as the plans the antenna support structure will be occupying, and the fall zone will cover a good portion of the current parking area designated to the Orient by the Sea. We require further information by Applicant addressing this issue. §280-74(D) (1) (c) & (2) Applicant does not meet the requirements set forth in such sections because the applicant has failed to submit a complete written site location alternative analysis. It only has provided an Affidavit, sworn to by Doug Hall on October 9, 2009, prepared for both New Cingular and MetroPCS stating that the carrier radio frequency engineers determined that none of the existing buildings or structures lying in the subject area would be suitable for a facility that would be capable of eliminating the coverage gap in the area, however, such affidavit does not described in any detail the locations of the existing alternatives, the availability of those sites and the reasons ~ t sites would not meet the applicant's ser~or engineering needs. There is a building at t'h'~ proposed site and there has been no discug'gWon as to why a structure containing the applicants could not go on the rooftop of the building. This would eliminate a number of the concerns raised in this report (including without limitation, the fall zone and interference with parking). Furthermore, the applicant provided an Affidavit sworn to by Joseph Sweet on November 23, 2009, stating that the proposed stealth monopole will be capable of accommodating collocation of additional antennas for future users, yet it fails to mention the quantity of antennas that is could carry. 9) §280-74(D)(3) Applicant has not provided the required information set for in this section whereby it requires that the application include a plan which shall reference all existing wireless communication facility locations in the Town of Southold, any such facilities in the abutting towns which provide service to areas with the Town of Southold, and any changes thereto. 10) §280-74(D)(8) Pursuant to this section Applicant has failed to explain why it selected the proposed site, whether there is availability or lack thereof of a suitable structure within the search ring for a co-location. For this section the Wireless Facilities Statute requires correspondence with other telecommunication providers--none were found in the submission. In addition the Wireless Facilities Statute requires evidence supporting the existence of inadequate service. To this end, Applicant has provided propagation maps (deficiency discussed above), however, it has not supplied in its application materials drive test maps, traffic studies, and/or customer complaint logs. 11) Pursuant to §280-133 and the Site Plan Application Checklist the following items are missing and/or incomplete for the application: Property surveys (deficiency described in 7; and the survey submitted are not clearly identified as to date of the revision); · Grading and drainage plan with calculations; · Proposed landscape plan; · Architectural review materials; and · Scaled sketch of sign showing color, material type and sign lighting details; Until you provide the required information as noted above, we are unable to make our recommendation to the Town that the application is complete. We strongly recommend a conference call with you to go over the comments in this letter, specifically to review what we believe is necessary to complete the application. We invite you to include the individuals that are preparing the technical information propagation maps, drive test, data sheet, tower drawings and calculations to be included in the call. This will help insure the completeness of your next submittal. Please contact Denise Benun at 212 921-5527 to establish the date and time for the call. Sincerely, R.-&. Com± (electronic signature) Richard A. Comi CMS cc: Town Planning Board (via email and regular mail) Denise Benun (via email) Propagation Study Requirements Propagation studies are required with the application to prove the need for any new tower site, or co-location on any existing structure where there is an increase in the height of the structure or any modification where there is an increase in the height of the antenna(s) on the structure.. (If service at the site is proposed for the cellular frequency band (800 900 MHz), even if the site will also utilize other frequencies, the studies need to be done at the cellular frequency band.) For a new tower or where there would be an increase the height of the existing tower or other structure, two propagation studies are required; one are the proposed height and another set of studies at 10' lower, unless something different is otherwise agreed to at the pre-applicafion meeting.(Along with the lower propagation study should be a narrative that describes why the lower height is not sufficient) If the application is for co-locating on an existing tower or other structure without increasing the height of the existing tower or structure, then propagation studies are only required at the height proposed by the applicant. Legend: Propagation studies are to include a legend on each sheet showing the following at a minimum: 1) a scale of miles or distance of no smaller than 1" to l/2 mile; and 2) color coded of signal strength designations at -101dBm for "on-street" service, -95 bBm for "in-vehicle" service and -85 dBm for "in-building" service (except in urban areas where it can be demonstrated that there are several four story or larger buildings in the proposed coverage area). It is preferable that Propagation studies be provided on clear acetate sheets so that they may be overlaid and more easily read individually or in conjunction with each other, as may be necessary for proper analysis. A base map of the community on which to overlay the propagation study is needed that must show and identify the maj or roads in the intended service area. For any proposed site located less than 2 miles from a community's boundary, the boundary must be shown on the map. The base map must be the same scale as the overlay propagation maps. Note: Only signal strengths of-101dBm for "on-street" service, -95 dBm [or In-Vehicle service and -85 dBm f_~ In-Building service will be considered in the context of the need for the facility and the need for the requested height, unless the facility is intended to serve an urban market. This is based on the accepted losses inherent with each situation and the ability of the band unit to function normally at -106 dBm. Note: The Applicant must state whether the proposed facilitF design i_s for in-vehicle coverage (:~ dBm) or in- building coverage ~ dBm). If an applicant believes it needs different signal strength levels, such must be justified in sufficient detail to allow verification of the technological need, such as a statement or explanation by the phone manufacturer or the carrier that greater signal strengths are needed and why lesser signal strengths will not perrmt the handset to function as designed or certain services to be provided in a functional context. Note that the local regulatory body is not required to grant an applicant's "best case" or most desired situation, but rather what will enable the handset to function as designed and the service to be reliable. Note: Propagation studies must be accompanied by all modeling information used to produce them (using the provided "Data Sheet for Propagation Study" fom~), including, but not limited to the ERP (Effective Radiated Power) from the site/facility that is the subject of the application and all adjacent sites/facilities and the cut sheets from all equipment showing the operating characteristic% such as, for purposes of example: The power of the radios stated in watts The gains and losses from each component of all equipment - ~ici al Solutions Propagation ~ Da~a Sheet for Proposed Facility Applicant: ~ Name/title person completing form: Proposed Site Name:I I Site Address:I nstructions: Complete this form, attach radio and ante~-na spec sheets and include with the RF Propagation Study, All nearby sites (adj8 3roviding coverage in and near the proposed site are to be included in the study. Use an additional form if more than 3 sites Line No. ITEM UNIT Proposed site Adjacent site #1 Adjacent site #2 Adjacent site Data Data Data GENERAL INFO: #1 Site Name #2 Site Address #3 Tower or structure height feet #4 Antenna mounting height agl feet #5 Network Technology #6 Operating Frequency MgHz #7 Base Station Manufacturer #8 Base Station Model # #9 Radio Max Power Watts #10 is pilot channel used for propagation (yes or no) #11 If yes, pilot channel power Watts min. 20% of power) #12 Convert Power to dBm dBm #13 Losses: #14 Is there a combiner #15 If yes make and model #16 If yes, combiner loss dB #17 Cable losses: #18 Cable diameter In. #19 Cable Igth. From antenna to Ft equipment #20 Cable loss per 100 ft. dB #21 Calculated loss dB #22 Connectors #23 Number of connectors #24 Loss per connector dB #25 Calculated Loss dB #26 Jumpers: #27 Number of jumpers #28 Loss perjumpel dB #29 Calculated Ios~ dB #30 Total calculated loss: dB #31 Gains: #32 Is there an in line amplifier #33 If yes, gait dB #34 Antenna Mffg. #35 Antenna Model # #36 Antenna gain dB #37 Total gain: dB #38 Result: ~ #39 Transmission Power dBm #40 ERP Watts I To Calculate ERP (i ~,~-~9) of an Antenna: Step #1: Insert the rad~'~"'power in Watts in line 9 and pilot power, if appli'~le in Line 11. Step #2: Convert the radio power or pilot power, as applicable, into dBm units. Insert the result into Line #12 Step #3: Add all dB losses: Line #16 + Line #21+ Line #25 + Line #29; Insert the result into Line #30 Step #4: Add all dB gains: Line #33 + Line #36; Insert the result into Line #37 Step $5: Add Line #37 to Line #12. Subtract from the result, Line #30. Insert the result into Line #39. Step #6: Convert the number in Line #39 into Watts. Record the result in Line #-40. 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD 518-439-3079 GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX: 518-478-0909 June 9, 2010 (via email and regular mail) Mr. John J. Coughlin Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 26 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Re: Southold NY MetroPCS 40200 Main Rd Orient 2010 j Dear Mr. Coughlin; We have reviewed the above referenced application received with cover letter dated January 14, 2010. For reasons we set forth below, we find that the application is incomplete in accordance the Wireless Facilities Statute for the Town of Southold ("Wireless Facility Statute"). We have three general comments; 1) We deem the New Cingular application at the same site to be a separate application thus feedback thereto has been sent under separate cover. 2) In accordance with section 280-74 of the Town's Code, MetroPCS should have submitted $2750 in connection with its application herewith. However, the only fee information pertaining to this application received by us is a copy of a check (~4364) made out to the Town for $1,000.00 $2520.00. The fee discrepancy associated with the application needs to be resolved. 3) All of the documents needed for a co-location must be part of the MetroPCS application, not merely included as part of a "co-application". Our comments related to sections of the code are as follows; 1) §280-74(B) (I) (b) requires written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance with applicable laws. As a co-locator on a proposed tower, the structural requirements under the code need to be contained in the MetroPCS application. To this end, the applicant provided William F. Collins, AIA, letter dated August 7, 2009, documenting the proposed facility's structural compliance with applicable law ("Collins' Letter"). The Collins' Letter is not satisfactory structural verification because it does not address the foundation of the structure, the soil and/or the overall calculations. Soils, foundation and structural calculations need to be provided to ensure structural compliance. 2) §280-74 (B) (1) (a) requires written analysis demonstrating the project complies with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations in accordance with §280-70 (Radio emissions). We find the information provided to be insufficient. 3) Consistent with previous comments a special exception application requires a complete building permit application and a site plan application. Since MetroPCS applied on the same application as New Cingular such material for MetroPCS is incomplete. 4) §280-74(B)(1)(d) & (e) requires propagation maps for existing surrounding and/or approve sites, coverage from all alternatives sites considered and coverage from proposed sites and a gap map prepared and signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer and overlaid on an existing coverage. The propagation maps provided are incomplete as follows: Mr. Balzano, in his affidavit dated October 29, 2009, provided signal strengths that he claims are required by MetroPCS for in-building commercial, in-building residential and in-vehicle reliable service. We agree with his signal strengths. What we do not see is what ERP was imput into the propagation model. (See attached Propagation Study Requirements and Propagation Data Study sheet). The area of coverage surrounding the proposed site is comprised of buildings three stories high or less. They are mostly residential homes for which we believe that -85dBm will provide reliable in building coverage (With -95dBm providing reliable in-vehicle coverage). Therefore we do not understand the reason for map 3, in-building commercial. The Pinnacle Telecom Group, FCC MPE Compliance and Assessment and Report, provides that MetroPCS New York, LLC is proposing an antenna centerline height of 57 feet AGL. Why is a height of 57 feet AGL required? There are very few trees in the vicinity of the proposed site. What dBm loss was used in the propagation model for trees or clutter? We require new propagation maps utilizing the ERP as calculated on the Propagation data sheet done at -85dBm and -95dBm. We would also like to see maps done at a l0 foot less height. (47 feet AGL) with an explanation of how and where any reduction occurs. Has a drive test been conducted? Can we get a CW drive test of the area at varying heights? Ifa drive test has been conducted, can we get a copy showing the signal strength in order to validate the propagation maps and a narrative of how the drive test has been utilized to validate the propagation maps? We are aware that MetroPCS is proposing additional sites in Southold. Why are no sites shown on the propagation maps? 5) §280-74(B) (1) (g) requires a copy of the deed or lease agreement. We have no lease agreement allowing MetroPCS to go on the monopole, if permitted. In addition, the lease with MGH; i) has not been properly notarized; ii) Exhibit A and Exhibit B Description of the Lessor's Real Property and Description of Premises, respectively are not properly dated; and iii) Exhibit C the Memorandum of Agreement has not been completed and/or executed. 6) §280-74(C)(4)-Vicinity Plan the print titled "500'Vicinity Map for the Orient Point Marina (MGH Enterprises)' lists property use and zoning as of December 22, 2009 signed by Matthew Crane, however, the document states the Vicinity Plan was revised on January 11, 2010. Why is there discrepancy between these dates? In addition, the affixed certification is not appropriately executed. 7) §280-74(C); (11)--Fall zone Radius and distance - The code requires a fail zone radius that is twice the height of the structure. The prints show the proposed tower to be approximately twenty (20) feet from the properly line (the adjacent property is the Orient Beach State Park, which an area where people congregate). Even using "break point design" for the tower, we do not see how the setback requirement could be met as the "break point" would need to be in the upper ten (10) feet of the structure where the antennas are located. How do you address this requirement? As a co-locator with an antenna centefline of 57 feet AGL, your antennas do not meet the setback requirements. 8) In order to receive site plan approval under the Wireless Facility Statute, §280-72 requires that the antenna support structure to be sited on developed commercial or industrial properties shall not encroach on parking areas. We call this particular requirement to your attention because from our site visit as well as the plans the antenna support structure will be occupying, and the fall zone will cover a good portion of the current parking area designated to the Orient by the Sea. We require further information by Applicant addressing this issue. Although MetroPCS is a co-locator, their height at 57 feet AGL impacts the parking. We require further information by Applicant addressing this issue. 9) §280-74(D) (I) (c) & (2) Applicant does not meet the requirements set forth in such sections because the applicant has failed to submit a complete written site location alternative analysis. It only has provided an Affidavit, sworn to by Doug Hall on October 9, 2009, prepared for both New Cingular and MetroPCS stating that the carrier radio frequency engineers determined that none of the existing buildings or structures lying in the subject area would be suitable for a facility that would be capable of eliminating the coverage gap in the area, however, such affidavit does not described in any detail the locations of the existing altematives, the availability of those sites and the reasons such sites would not meet the applicant's service or engineering needs. There is a building at the proposed site and there has been no discussion as to why a structure containing the applicants could not go on the rooftop of the building. This would eliminate a number of the concerns raised in this report (including without limitation, the fall zone and interference with parking). 10) Pursuant to §280-133 and the Site Plan Application Checklist the following items are missing and/or incomplete for the application: · Property surveys (deficiency described in 7; and the survey submitted are not clearly identified as to date of the revision); · Grading and drainage plan with calculations; · Proposed landscape plan; · Architectural review materials; and · Scaled sketch of sign showing color, material type and sign lighting details; Until you provide the required information as noted above, we are unable to make our recommendation to the Town that the application is complete. We strongly recommend a conference call with you to go over the comments in this letter, specifically to review what we believe is necessary to complete the application. We invite you to include the individuals that are preparing the technical information propagation maps, drive test, data sheet, tower drawings and calculations to be included in the call. This will help insure the completeness of your next submittal. Please contact Denise Benun at 212 921-5527 to establish the date and time for the call. CMS cc: Town Planning Board (via email and regular mail) Denise Benun (via email) Propagation Study Requirements Propagation studies are required with the application to prove the need for any new tower site, or co-location on any existing structure where there is an increase in the height of the stntcture or any modification where there is an increase in the height of the antenna(s) on the structure.. (If service at the site is proposed for the cellular frequency band (800 - 900 MHz), even if the site will also utilize other frequencies, the studies need to be done at the cellular frequency band.) For a new tower or where there would be an increase the height of the existing tower or other structure, two propagation studies are required; one are the proposed height and another set of studies at 10' lower, unless something different is otherwise agreed to at the pre-application meeting.(Along with the lower propagation study should be a narrative that describes why the lower height is not sufficient) If the application is for co-locating on an existing tower or other structure without increasing the height of the existing tower or structure, then propagation studies are only required at the height proposed by the applicant. Legend: Propagation studies are to include a legend on each sheet showing the following at a minimum: 1) a scale of miles or distance of no smaller than 1" to 1/2 mile; and 2) color coded of signal strength designations at -101dBm for "on-street" service, -95 bBm for "in-vehicle" service and -85 dBm for "in-building" service (except in urban areas where it can be demonstrated that there are several four story or larger buildings in the proposed coverage area). It is preferable that Propagation studies be provided on clear acetate sheets so that they may be overlaid and more easily read individually or in conjunction with each other, as may be necessary for proper analysis. A base map of the community on which to overlay the propagation study is needed that must show and identify the major roads in the intended service area. For any proposed site located less than 2 miles from a community's boundary, the boundary must be shown on the map. The base map must be the same scale as the overlay propagation maps. Note: Only signal strengths of-101dBm for "on-street" service, -95 dBm [or In-Vehicle service and -85 dBm for In-Building service will be considered in the context of the need for the facility and the need for the requested height, unless the facility is intended to serve an urban market. This is based on the accepted losses inherent with each situation and the ability of the hand unit to function normally at -106 dBm. Note: The Applicant must state whether the proposed facili02 design is.~or in-vehicle coverage (-95 dBm) or in- building coverage (-85 dBm). If an applicant believes it needs different signal strength levels, such must be justified in sufficient detail to allow verification of the technological need, such as a statement or explanation by the phone manufacturer or the carrier that greater signal strengths are needed and why lesser signal strengths will not permit the handset to function as designed or certain services to be provided in a functional context. Note that the local regulatory body is not required to grant an applicant 'x "best case" or most desired situation, but rather what will enable the handset to function as designed and the service to be reliable. Note: Propagation studies must be accompanied by all modeling information used to produce them (using the provided "Data Sheet for Propagation Study" form), including, but not limited to the ERP (Effective Radiated Power) from the site/facility that is the subject of the application and all adiacent sites/facilities and the cut sheets from all equipment showing the operating characteristics, such as, for pnrposes of example: The power of the radios stated in watts The gains and losses from each component of all equipment t_ The Center for Municipal Solutions / Propagation Study_Data Sheet for Pro }osed Facility i-- Applicant: Name/title person completing form: Proposed Site Name: Site Address: In'ructions: Complete this form, attach radio and antenna spec sheets and include with the RF Propagation Study. All nearby sites (a, providing coverage in and near the proposed site are to be included in the study. Use an additional form if more than 3 sites Line No. ITEM UNIT Proposed site Adjacent site #1 Adjacent site #2 Adjacent site Data Data Data GENERAL INFO: #1 Site Name #2 Site Address #3 rower or structure height feet #4 ~.ntenna mounting height agl feet #5 Network Technology #6 Operating Frequency MgHz #7 Base Station Manufacturer #8 Base Station Model # #9 Radio Max Power Watts #10 Is pilot channel used for propagation (yes or no) #1 I If yes, pilot channel power Watts min. 20% of power) #12 Convert Power to dBm dBm #13 Losses: #14- Is there a combiner #15 If yes make and model #16 if yes, combiner loss dB #17 Cable losses: #18 Cable diameter In. #19 Cable Igth. From antenna to Ft equipment #20 Cable loss per 100 ft. dB #21 Calculated loss dB #22 Connectors #23 Number of connectors #24 Loss per connector dB #25 Calculated Loss dB #26 Jumpers: #27 Number of jumpers #28 Loss per jumper dB #29 Calculated los.~ dB #30 Total calculated loss: dB #31 Gains: #32 Is there an in line amplifier #33 If yes, gait dB #34 ~,ntenna Mftg. #35 ~.ntenna Model # #36 ~,ntenna gain dB #37 Fetal gain: dB #38 Result: #39 Transmission Power dBm I #40 ERP Watts To Calculate ERP (Line #40} of an Antenna: Step #1: Insert the radio power in Watts in line 9 and pilot power, if applicable in Line 11. Step #2: Convert the radio power or pilot power, as applicable, into dBm units. Insert the result into Line #12 Step #3: Add all dB losses: Line #16 + Line #21+ Line #25 + Line #29; Insert the result into Line #30 Step CfA: Add all dB gains: Line #33 + Line #36; Inser[ the result into Line #37 Step $5: Add Line #37 to Line #12. Subtract from the result, Line #30. Insert the result into Line #39. Step #6: Convert the number in Line #39 into Watts. Record the result in Line #~40. Client: Southold NY Metro PCS Invoice 40200 Main Rd. Orient Invoice #:67576-001 (21303) The Center for Municipal Solutions (~,}~) 70 Cambridge Dr. Glenmont, NY 12077 Date: Description (518)439-3079 26-Apr initial review of application material 4/27&28 1/2 time of site visit 4/27&28 4/27&28 4/27&28 4/27&28 4/27&28 28-Apr 28-Apr 28~Apr 1/2 travel time (reduuced by an additional hour due to spli~ting travel time with other meeting in Westchester) 1/2 mileage ( reduced by additional 48 for meeting in Westchester) 212~ $.50 per mile 1/2 of tolls 1/2 of motel I/2 of meals Site visit with the Southold's Planning division Mileage 76 ~$.50 Travel time to/from Southold TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 1,560.40 I, Richard A. Coral, certify that the above account in the amount of $ 1,560.40 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is actually due. 5/01/10 ~, ..~, ~.~z Date Signature 5/18/2010 Hrs Rate: Expenses. Amount 0.8 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 0.9 $ 250.00 $ 225.00 3.6 $ 125.00 $ 450.00 $ 106.00 $ 8.74 $ 40.00 $ 17.66 0.9 $ 250.00 $ 225.00 $ 38.00 2.0 $ 125.00 $ 250.00 (Electronic Signature) $ 210.40 $ 1,350.00 JUN 10 2010 Client: So~thold NY A'lr 40200 Main Rd. Orient Invoice #:22007-001 ~. \"~ ~) Date: 26-Apr 4/27&28 Description initial review of application material 1/2 time of site visit Invoice The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Dr. Glenmont, NY 12077 (518)439-3079 4/27&28 4/27&28 4/27&28 4/27&28 4/27&28 28-Apr 28-Apr 28-Apr 1/2 travel time (reduuced by an additional hour due to splitting travel time with other meeting in Westchester) 1/2 mileage ( reduced by additional 48 for meeting in Westchester) 212~ $.50 per mile 1/2 of tolls t~ of motel 1/2 of meals Site visit with the Southo~d's Planning divtsion Mileage 76 ~$.50 Travel time to/from Southold TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 1,560.40 I, Richard A. Comi, certify that the above account in the amount of $ 1,560.40 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is actually due. 5/01/10 Date Signature 5/18/2010 Hrs Rate: Expenses. Amount 0.8 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 0.9 $ 250.00 $ 225.00 3.6 $ 125.00 $ 450.00 $ 106.00 $ 8.74 $ 40.00 $ 17.66 0.9 $ 250.00 $ 225.00 $ 38.00 2.0 $ 125.00 $ 250.00 $ 210.40 $ 1,350.00 (Electronic Signature) 518439-3079 CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX: 518-478-0909 May 27, 2010 (via email and regular mail) Mr. John J. Coughlin Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Re: Southold NY ATT 40200 Main Rd Orient Dear Mr. Coughlin; We have reviewed the above referenced application received with cover letter dated January 14, 2010. For reasons we set forth below, we find that the application is incomplete in accordance the Wireless Facilities Statute for the Town of Southold ("Wireless Facility Statute"). We have two general comments; 1) We deem the MetroPCS New York, LLC co-location application to be a separate application thus feedback thereto will be sent under separate cover. 2) In accordance with section 280-74 of the Town's Code, New Cingular should have submitted $3750 in connection with its application herewith. However, the only fee information pertaining to this application received by us is a copy of a nondescript cheek for $2520.00. Assuming the check is indeed from New Cingular, the fee discrepancy associated with the application. Needs to be resolved. Our comments related to sections of the code are as follows; 1) §280-74(B) (1) (b) requires written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance with applicable laws. To this end, the applicant provided William F. Collins, AIA, letter dated August 7, 2009, documenting the proposed facility's structural compliance with applicable law ("Collins' Letter"). The Collins' Letter is not satisfactory structural verification because it does not address the foundation of the structure, the soil and/or the overall calculations. Soils, foundation and structural calculations need to be provided to ensure structural compliance. 2) §280-74(B)(1)(d) & (e) requires propagation maps for existing surrounding and/or approve sites, coverage from all alternatives sites considered and coverage from proposed sites and a gap map prepared and signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer and overlaid on an existing coverage. The propagation maps provided are incomplete as follows: There is no signal strength provided on the maps. Mr. Guillabert, in his affidavit dated October 26, 2009, provided signal strengths that he claims are required by Cingular for in-building, in- vehicle and on street reliable service. We disagree with his signal strengths. (See attached Propagation Study Requirements and Propagation Data Study sheet). The area of coverage surrounding the proposed site is comprised of buildings three stories high or less. They are mostly residential homes for which we believe that -85dBm will provide reliable in building coverage (~h -95dBm providing reliable in-vehicle cl~age). If New Cingular Wireless believes that they require stronger signal level they need to provide detailed proof as to why such signal strength is required. In addition, the Pinnacle Telecom Group, FCC MPE Compliance and Assessment and Report, provides that New Cingular is proposing an antenna centerline height of 77 feet AGL and MetroPCS New York, LLC is proposing an antenna centerline height of 57 feet AGL. Why is there 20 feet between the two applicants? The Collins' Letter provides for a future carrier at 67 feet AGL using the same Kathrein # 800-10121 Antenna giving the impression that New Cingular has plans to expand downwards, thus if67 feet AGL is a sufficient height to meet its claimed gap coverage why does this application propose an 80 foot AGL tower? We require new propagation maps utilizing the ERP as calculated on the Propagation data sheet done at -85dBm and -95dBm. We also require the most recent drive test of the Town showing the signal strength in order to validate the propagation maps and a narrative of how the drive test has been utilized to validate the propagation maps. 3) §280-74(B) (1) (g) requires a copy of the deed or lease agreement. We find the lease to be incomplete for the following reasons: i) the corporate acknowledgment is blank; ii) Exhibit 1 Description of the Premise does not contain a legal description and is not dated; and iii) the Memorandum of Agreement is missing. 4) §280-74(C) (2) provides for an aeronautical study or appropriate consultant's report demonstrating that the proposed facility will not interfere with air navigation. The Aeronautical study and the FAA Notice Criteria Tool as provided assumes an 80 foot structure, however, the Collins' Letter states that the applicant is proposing an eight (8) foot Lighting Rod ~ 80'-0 AGL, thus invalidating the aeronautical study and the FAA Notice Criteria Tool. How do you intend to address this issue? 5) §280-74(C)(4)-Vicinity Plan--the print titled "500'Vicinity Map for the Orient Point Marina (MGH Enterprises)' lists property use and zoning as of December 22, 2009 signed by Matthew Crane, however, the document states the Vicinity Plan was revised on January 11, 2010. Why is there discrepancy between these dates? In addition, the affixed certification is not appropriately executed. 6) §280-74(C); (11)--Fall zone Radius and distance - The code requires a fall zone radius that is twice the height of the structure. The prints show the proposed tower to be approximately twenty (20) feet from the property line (the adjacent property is the Orient Beach State Park, which an area where people congregate). Even using "break point design" for the tower, we do not see how the setback requirement could be met as the "break point" would need to be in the upper ten (10) feet of the structure where the antennas are located. How do you address this requirement? 7) In order to receive site plan approval under the Wireless Facility Statute, §280°72 requires that the antenna support structure to be sited on developed commercial or industrial properties shall not encroach on parking areas. We call this particular requirement to your attention because from our site visit as well as the plans the antenna support structure will be occupying, and the fall zone will cover a good portion of the current parking area designated to the Orient by the Sea. We require further information by Applicant addressing this issue. 8) §280-74(D) (1) (c) & (2) Applicant does not meet the requirements set forth in such sections because the applicant has failed to submit a complete written site location alternative analysis. It only has provided an Affidavit, sworn to by Doug Hall on October 9, 2009, prepared for both New Cingular and MetroPCS stating that the carrier radio frequency engineers determined that none of the existing buildings or structures lying in the subject area would be suitable for a facility that would be capable of eliminating the coverage gap in the area, however, such affidavit does not described in any detail the locations of the existing alternatives, the availability of those sites and the reasons s would not meet the applicant's servOr engineering needs. Osites There is a building at the proposed site and there has been no discussTon as to why a structure containing the applicants could not go on the rooftop of the building. This would eliminate a number of the concerns raised in this report (including without limitation, the fall zone and interference with parking). Furthermore, the applicant provided an Affidavit sworn to by Joseph Sweet on November 23, 2009, stating that the proposed stealth monopole will be capable of accommodating collocation of additional antennas for future users, yet it fails to mention the quantity of antennas that is could carry. 9) §280-74(D)(3) Applicant has not provided the required information set for in this section whereby it requires that the application include a plan which shall reference all existing wireless communication facility locations in the Town of Southold, any such facilities in the abutting towns which provide service to areas with the Town of Southold, and any changes thereto. 10) §280-74(D)(8) Pursuant to this section Applicant has failed to explain why it selected the proposed site, whether there is availability or lack thereof of a suitable structure within the search ring for a co-location. For this section the Wireless Facilities Statute requires correspondence with other telecommunication providers--none were found in the submission. In addition the Wireless Facilities Statute requires evidence supporting the existence of inadequate service. To this end, Applicant has provided propagation maps (deficiency discussed above), however, it has not supplied in its application materials drive test maps, traffic studies, and/or customer complaint logs. 11) Pursuant to §280-133 and the Site Plan Application Checklist the following items are missing and/or incomplete for the application: · Property surveys (deficiency described in 7; and the survey submitted are not clearly identified as to date of the revision); · Grading and drainage plan with calculations; · Proposed landscape plan; · Architectural review materials; and · Scaled sketch of sign showing color, material type and sign lighting details; Until you provide the required information as noted above, we are unable to make our recommendation to the Town that the application is complete. We strongly recommend a conference call with you to go over the comments in this letter, specifically to review what we believe is necessary to complete the application. We invite you to include the individuals that are preparing the technical information propagation maps, drive test, data sheet, tower drawings and calculations to be included in the call. This will help insure the completeness of your next submittal. Please contact Denise Benun at 212 921-5527 to establish the date and time for the call. CMS cc: Town Planning Board (via email and regular mail) Denise Benun (via email) Propagation Study Requirements Propagation studies are required with the application to prove the need for any new tower site, or co-location on any existing structure where there is an increase in the height of the structure or any modification where there is an increase in the height of the antenna(s) on the structure.. (If service at the site is proposed for the cellular frequency band (800 - 900 MHz), even if the site will also utilize other frequencies, the studies need to be done at the cellular frequency band.) For a new tower or where there would be an increase the height of the existing tower or other structure, two propagation studies are required; one are the proposed height and another set of studies at 10' lower, unless something different is otherwise agreed to at the pre-application meeting.(Along with the lower propagation study should be a narrative that describes why the lower height is not sufficient) If the application is for co-locating on an existing tower or other structure without increasing the height of the existing tower or structure, then propagation studies are only required at the height proposed by the apphcant. Legend: Propagation studies are to include a legend on each sheet showing the following at a minimum: 1) a scale of miles or distance of no smaller than 1" to 1/2 mile; and 2) color coded of signal strength designations at -101dBm for "on-street" service, -95 bBm for "in-vehicle" service and -85 dBm for "in-building" service (except in urban areas where it can be demonstrated that there are several four story or larger buildings in the proposed coverage area). It is preferable that Propagation studies be provided on clear acetate sheets so that they may be overlaid and more easily read individually or in conjunction with each other, as may be necessary for proper analysis. A base map of the community on which to overlay the propagation study is needed that must show and identify the major roads in the intended service area. For any proposed site located less than 2 miles from a community's boundary, the boundary must be shown on the map. The base map must be the same scale as the overlay propagation maps. Note: Only signal strengths of-101dBm for "on-street" service, -95 dBm for In-Vehicle service and -85 dBm for In-Building service will be considered in the context of the need for the facility and the need for the requested height, unless the facility is intended to serve an urban market. This is based on the accepted losses inherent with each situation and the ability of the hand unit to fimctiun normally at -106 dBm. Note: The Applicant must state whether the proposed facility design is for in-vehicle coverage (-95 dBm) or in- building coverage (-85 dBm). If an applicant believes it needs different signal strength levels, such must be justified in sufficient detail to allow verification of the technological need, such as a statement or explanation by the phone manufacturer or the carder that greater signal strengths are needed and why lesser signal strengths will not permit the handset to function as designed or certain services to be provided in a functional context. Note that the local regulatory body is not required to grant an applicant's "best case" or most desired situation, but rather what will enable the handset to function as designed and the service to be reliable. Note: Propagation studies must be accompanied by nil modeling information used to produce them (using the provided "Data Sheet for Propagation Study" form), including, but not limited to the ERP (Effective Radiated Power) from the site/facility that is the subject of the application and all adjacent sites/facilities and the cut sheets from all equipment showing the operating characteristics, such as, for purposes of example: rn The power of the radios stated in watts [] The gains and losses from each component of all equipment The~Solutions Data Sheet for Pro ~osed Facility Applicant: Name/title person completing __ Proposed Site N~me: { I Site Address: I -- nstructions: Complete this form, attach radio and antenna spec sheets and include with the RF Propagation Study. All nearby sites ~roviding coverage in and near the proposed site am to be included in the study. Use an additional form if more than 3 sites Line No. ITEM UNIT Proposed site Adjacent site #1 Adjacent site #2 Adjacent sil~ Data Data Data GENERAL INFO: #1 Site Name #2 Site Address #3 Tower or structure height feet #4 ~,ntenna mounting height agl feet #5 ',letwork Technology #6 ~)perating Frequency MgHz #7 gase Station Manufacturer ~ E~ase Station Model # #9 F~adio Max Power Watts #10 Is pilot channel used for propagation (yes or no) #11 If yes, pilot channel power Watts (min. 20% of power) #12 Convert Power to dBm dBm #13 Losses: #14 Is there a combiner #15 If yes make and model #16 If yes, combiner loss dB #17 Cable losses: #18 Cable diameter In. #19 Cable Igth. From antenna to Ft equipment #20 Cable loss per 100 ft. dB #21 Calculated loss dB #22 .~onnectors #23 Number of connectors #24 Loss per connectol dS #25 Calculated Los.. dB #26 Jumpers: #27 Number of jumper~ #28 Loss per jumpel dB #29 Calculated loss dB #30 Total calcuiatad tess: dB #31 Gains: #32 is there an in line amplifier #33 If yes, gain dB #34 Antenna Mftg. #35 Antenna Model # #36 Antenna gain dB #37 Total gain: dB #38 Result: #39 Transmission Power dBm I #~0 --RP Watts I To Calculate ERP (Line #40) of an Antenna: Step #1: Insert the r; ~ ,wer in Watts in line 9 and pilot power, if apl ; in Line 11. Step #2: Convert the ra~o power or pilot power, as applicable, into dBm units. Insert the result into Line #12 Step #3: Add all dB losses: Line #16 + Line #21+ Line #25 + Line #29; Insert the result into Line #30 Step #-4: Add all dB gains: Line #33 + Line #36; Insert the result into Line #37 Step $5: Add Line #37 to Line #12. Subtract from the result, Line #30. Insert the result into Line #39. Step #6: Convert the number in Line #39 into Watts. Record the result in Line #40. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WiLLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 11, 2010 Ms. Denise S. Benun 16 Drake Lane Manhasset, NY 11030 Re: Proposed Site Plan New Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises Located at 40200 NYS Route 25, Orient SCTM# 1000-15 -9-8.1 Zoning District: MII Dear Mr. Benun: Enclosed is a copy of the Preliminary Visual Impact Analysis by VHB Engineering regarding the above-referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly youm, Senior Planner Encls. cc: Richard Comi PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 23, 2010 Mr. Richard A. Comi d/b/a The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re; Consulting Services re Proposed Site Plan New Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises Located at 40200 NYS Route 25, Orient SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 ~ Zoning District: M-II Dear Mr. Comi: Enclosed is the signed agreement regarding the consulting services you will be performing for the Town of Southold Planning Department in connection with the above wireless application (primary carrier and colocation). Sincerely, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Eric. AGREEMENT This agreement made and entered into this ~r~ day of ~ fl~ I g 2010 by and between RICHARD A. COMI d/b/a THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS (herein after referred to as Consultant) (mailing address: 70 Cambridge Drive, Glenmont, New York 12077) party of the first part, and THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NY 11971 (hereinafter referred to as Client) (mailing address; Town Hall Annex 54375 SR 25 Southold, NY 11971) party of the second part. Consultant and Client, for the consideration named, hereby agree as follows: PURPOSE Client hereby retains Consultant for the purpose of assisting, advising and representing the Client on matters relating to reviewing and analyzing wireless applications for two carders (New Cingular and Metro PCS) for a proposed facility at 40200 Main Road Odent NY 11957, received by client for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. 2. SPECIFIC SERVICES: SERVICES DURING PROCESSING OF THE APPLICATION The Consultant shall furnish appropriate Wireless Telecommunications Facilities siting assistance and advice to the Client and Client officials involved in the processing of the New Cingular and Metro PCS applications for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, and, in connection therewith, shall: a) review the application filed with the Client for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, b) assist and advise the Client in the analysis of the application, to include attending meetings with the Applicants and/or Client officials as required, c) recommend in writing to the Client whether the application should be approved or disapproved, and set forth in writing the reasons for such approval or disapproval, d) inspect the construction of the facility and in wdting recommend when/if the certificate of compliance should be issued. TIMES AND AT]-ENDANCE: COOPERATION BY CLIENT Consultant shall perform the services described herein in as expeditious a manner as is reasonably possible and with due consideration of the time requirements of Client. Client recognizes that the timing of the performance of Consultant's services may be affected by previous commitments to other clients (including the delivery of promised services and work product and previously scheduled meetings), and situations normally and traditionally deemed to be matters of a force majeure nature, including those influenced by the weather, strikes, or power outages. Client agrees to cooperate with Consultant, as needed, and to provide Consultant with copies of any records, documents and other information needed for the fulfillment of this agreement on a timely basis. Client further agrees to provide Consultant with access to appropdata officials and/or employees of Client, as may be needed in the fulfillment of the agreement. Moreover, both parties understand and agree that mutual accountability and responsiveness is cdtical to the successful completion of the project, and therefore both shall always make their best faith efforts to be accountable and promptly responsive to each other. COMPENSATION In payment for the services to be performed hereunder by Consultant, Client shall make payments to the Consultant as follows: A) The Client shall pay Consultant its normal published houdy rate (which at the date of this agreement is $250.00 per hour) for each hour of time devoted by Consultant to the performance of such services, provided, however, that for time traveling by Consultant in conjunction with the performance of such services, the Client shall pay Consultant 50% of the Consultants normal published rate. It is understood that the costs for all services, including expenses as covered below, will not exceed $8,500.00 for the pdmary carder on the new facility and $5000.00 for the carder collocating on the proposed facility, without additional approval from the Client. B) Consultant shall invoice the Clieot regularly, but no less frequently than monthly, after services have been performed, for any compensation payable. Such invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt, but in no case later than thirty (30) days. C) In the event that the Client disputes or objects to any portion of any invoice submitted bY Consultant pursuant to this agreement, Client shall, within fifteen (I 5) days of the receipt of such invoice, notify Consultant in wdting of such dispute or objection. D) Payments made by the Client more than thirty (30) days following the date of submission of an invoice shall incur a charge of one and one-half pement (1-1/2%) of the amount thereby deemed late, compounded monthly, until the amount due and owing by the Client is paid in full. REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES For services performed hereunder, Client shall reimburse Consultant, for out-of-pocket expenses for the following items: (a) Travel-related costs such as airfare, car rental, night lodging accommodations and meals consumed while on-site or enroute; (b) Expedited or overnight delivery service; (c) Any other reasonably necessary expenses directly related and attributable to the fulfillment of this agreement. Consultant's requests for expense reimbursement sha be ncluded 'n Consultant s 'nvo ce at actual cost, with no markup. STATUS OF CONSULTANT Consultant and Client agree that in the performance of Consultant's services hereunder, Consultant shall not be deemed to be an employee of Client for any purpose whatsoever, nor act under Color of State. NOTICES Any and all notices, invoices, and payments required hereunder shall be addressed to the parties at their respective addresses set forth in page 1 hereof, or to such other address as may hereafter be designated in writing by either party hereto. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT This agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the Laws of the State of New York. COMPLETE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION There are no terms, conditions or obligations other than those contained herein, and there are no written or verbal statements or representations, warranties or agreements with respect to this Agreement that have not been embodied herein. This agreement constitutes the complete undemtanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No modification or amendment of any provisions of this agreement shall be valid unless in writing and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Consultant and Client by individuals duly authorized to do so, have signed this agreement, the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT By: /~:~.~o,.~(electronic signature) R.A.Comi The Center for Municipal Solutions CLIENT Heather Lanza (pdnted) Title: Plannin8 Director PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN Il. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPII L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April12,2010 Mr. Richard A. Comi d/b/a The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re: Consulting Services re Proposed Site Plan New Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises Located at 40200 NYS Route 25, Orient SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 - Zoning District: M-II Dear Mr. Comi: The Planning Board has authorized your scope of services in connection with the above. This letter will authorize you to proceed with the consulting work as outlined in the Agreement. Enclosed are the approved Purchase Orders with amounts not to be exceeded. Any work beyond these amounts must be authorized in writing prior to being started. Also enclosed for your convenience is a Voucher Form for your use with each invoice submitted to this department. Sincerely, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Encs, RI)i, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE: (6{!11) 425-41OO FAGSI~IILE: (601) 42§-4104 April 9, 2010 VIA UPS Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 APR 12 2010 RE: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Construction of a Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: Orient by the Sea Marina 40200 Main Road (Route 25) Orient, New York SCTM#: 1000-15-9-8.1 Dear Ms. Winser: As you know, we are the attorneys for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ('AT&T) and MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned application, which was submitted on January 14, 2010. In furtherance of your correspondence of March 12, 2010 (copy attached hereto), enclosed please find the following checks, which sums represent the review fee for the technical consultant retained by the Town Planning Board. 1. DGCR, LLC Check Number 2213 in the sum of $8,500.00; and 2. MetroPCS Check Number 5290 in the sum of $5,000. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RI2. NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHL1N, LLP By:(.~ JJC:mk Enclosures PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOV~ISEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 15, 2010 Mr. Richard A. Comi 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re: Proposed Site Plan New Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises Located at 40200 NYS Route 25, Orient SCTM# 1000-15-9-8.1 Zoning District: MII Dear Mr. Comi: Enclosed herewith please find an application package and CD regarding the above- referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Kristy Wins~ Senior Planner Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 15, 2010 Ms. Denise S. Benun 16 Drake Lane Manhasset, NY 11030 Re: Proposed Site Plan New Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises Located at 40200 NYS Route 25, Orient SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 Zoning District: MII Dear Mr. Benun: Enclosed herewith please find an application package and CD regarding the above- referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Encls. cc: Richard Comi PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Via e-mail and regular mail March 12, 2010 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Rb, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: New Cingular Wireless PCS & Metro PCS, at Orient by the Sea Located at 23300 Main Road, Orient NY SCTM#1000-15-09-8.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Planning Department is conducting a review of the above application. Pursuant to {}280-74 of the Town Code, the Planning Board has determined to hire a technical consultant to review the application. To cover the cost of the technical consultant's review, we require a total payment of $13,500 as follows: $8,500 for the new tower and $5,000 for the co-location. Please remit a check in the amount of $13,500 payable to the Town of Southold as soon as possible. The payment will be submitted into an escrow account with the Town Comptroller's office. Receipt of this fee is a condition to a determination that your application is complete. Thank you. Sincerely, Kristy Winser Senior Planner WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, March 8, 2010 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda 4:45 p.m. Site Plans & Subdivisions [ ~5~'0i(~:t name: -ii~i~,ari ~i-n-~-',a~s- ...........-§'~-TM#' 1000-121:~:~-'~ Location: at the intemection of Bergen Avenue and Sound Avenue, on the no~h Description: additions & alterations to an existing wine~ on ~ C Zone Acbon. i Applicant requests an amendment to the pa~ing area on the approved i site ~.~.: A~achments: Project name: New C,ngular Wmreless/MGH i SCTM#: i 1000-15-9-8.1 Enterprises (Orient by the Sea Location: 40200 NYS Rout_e_2__5,_..Q..r_i_e_n_t- Description: Proposed construction of an 80 ft. monopole public utility wireless facility having internally mounted antenna for two wireless providers, New ~ cin_g.q..a[_W_ rel_es__s & f0~_M_etr~ Status: New Site Plan Town's behalf. Attachments: ~ Contract Prgject name' i Zuckerberg Lloyd P ~ SCTM# i 1000 86-1 10 9 ..................... ~ ..... i ......................................... Location: 2350 Wells Road, Peconic -Descrmptlon:~-: ~ 80~60 clustered conserva0on; ....... subdivision'-:': on 32.83 acres of land. Lot 1 equals 65,562 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 77,694 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 29.5416 acres and is proposed to be preserved through a Sale of ................................. _D_ .e_ v_e_Io~ .m_ _e_n_t_ Ri_g._h~..t_O.. ~ _h_~ _-r_o~...o..f_ $_ .o_~t_ _h _o_!_d Status: Sketch A~3p_roval Action: i Discuss draina~!e ease-m~- L..A~a.~.h.~n_ts_: Han._d_-?u_t 9f Map ~i~_~_oj~iii~i~i~e:-~_i ....... ! __A_r_i...e_~__ES_~_s_r_r_u_l_ly ............... _[ SCTM#.'_I~ 10~00-22-3-2 ........... Location: ~ at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way which extends north f.m~_K_a_ Y_J.ejgh '.S.. _C..o_u _rt _i_n_.E..a.~'~ k'l_ a~rio n orion: standard subdivision of an 11.4418-acre parcel into two lots, where Lot equals 3.7362 acres, including 1.4354 acres of open space, and Lot 2 equals 7.6786 acres, including 5.0872 acres of open space, in the R-80 Z-_ o. nj_ng _Di.~tri_c_t_ Status: $_ke t c.h__~DP_r_°Y..~ ! ............................................................................................. A_ction: Discuss aPl~licant's etter & MT/TS site visit. Attachments: Letter from Applicant/Staff Report Southold Town P ann nR Board - PaRe Two - Work Session - March 8, 2010 , ?_r_0j_e 9~t_n_ame; ......... S_ou_t _h ~_~ e w_P_r_?s_e_~e~ ...................... L~C__T_M#. ]_ 1_0_00_ -._8_7._; 5 - 21.4_,.._7,8 Location: i on the south side of Main Bayview Road, approximately 900' east of ~ ........................................ ~..C_ed_az. ~r_i_v_e, i~n_~_o_u_t h~ol~_ Description: i subdivide a 14.54-acre parcel into three lots where Lot 1 equals 44,735 s.f., Lot 2 equals 37,343 s.f. and Lot 3 equals 42,470 s.f., with the remaining 11.53 acres of the p_Lop_y_dy__to__b_e preserved as._op_e._n_~s~a_.._c~_. ~ Status: i Conditional PreliminanZ Approval 'Action: ' ' ' i i Review chanoed clearing rec]uest L Attachments: i Letter from Applicant/Staff Report i SCTM#:-[. 1000-83-2-9.1 ~ ~Aig-g~: ;;g-;L-~i- - - ~-~)~;~'L~-n d in. L*¥ ............................. -~ .................................... i Location:~J-"-~;-'-'-~'"'" ~ u ~,~, n/o Oregon Road, 625 feet w/o Bridge Lane, in Cutchogue in the A-C and": I R-80 Zoning Districts _De_s_c_r!ption:__ ! clustered conservation subdivision of a 25.79 acre parcel into five lots Status: i Final Approval i Co-ordinate Final Inspection with Town Engineer A~ctio~n .'~ ..... i ... _A_ t_t a c_ h _m_e__n._t_S. :_ ........... ~i ~_e~p r__ _f_r~ _m_ ~ ~ h_q ._G_u.!_d..0..,..._M_a_n z_i__U .o_ _m_eA ............................. '~ Proje_ct_n_ame: ..... j_Edson - _Z_BA ~__omm_e_n_~ ........... j SCTM#: [ 1000-102-_2_-1 _6 Location: t North side of S.R. 25, Cutchog_u_e Description: I Christmas Tree Farm ' ~Fa~-u-~i ................... ~Fi~TA- -'-"-o~-_P- jp I i c a~o~ {~)~-fi ~'~'~'i-~-~-~r~i~time. _ _Ac__tio_n_; ........................ ]_!~_e_v_i e~_w_ z B _A__D_.r_a. ff.._C_o_~ m~e~ t_s_ ............... Attachments: i Draft ZBA Comments 2 Page 1 of 1 Winser, Kristy From: Richard A. Comi [dick@telecomsol.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:12 PM To: Winser, Kristy; Lanza, Heather Cc: Denise Benun Subject: New Cingular & Metro PCS Kristy, Per our conversation earlier today, I have attached our agreement to review the two applications (New Cingular and Metro PCS at the one proposed tower location) I have put both applications on one agreement, however I could separate on two agreements if you desire. Of you need two agreements, just let me know and let me know which carrier is the primary and which is the co Iocator. As we discussed, if you could send a hard copy of each application to my address: Richard Comi CMS 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 and a copy of each to: Denise S. Benun 16 Drake Lane Manhasset, New York 11030 We will visit your we site and download the required application forms and code. If you have any questions, please give me a call. We look forward to working with you. Dick Comi CMS Richard A. Comi Email:dick@telecomsol.com Visit Our Web Site: http://www.telecomsol.com Phone:518-439-3079 2/25/2010 Page I of 2 Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:45 AM To: 'Marisa Knoth' Subject: RE: New Cingular Wireless (AT&T) and MetroPCS at Orient by the Sea, 40200 Main Road, Orient Hi Marisa, The Planning Board pursuant to §280-74 of the Town Code has decided to hire a technical consultant to assist in the review of this application. Once an estimate for the cost of consulting services has been determined, a letter will be sent with the amount to be paid by your client. Once paid and reviewed, you will be notified of what the next step will be (Either your application will be scheduled for a Planning Board work session to discuss the merits of the application or additional information may be requested). Contact me anytime with questions you may have. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Krj~;ty V~/ir]~er~town~s0u~h~!~d,ny us ..... Original Message ..... From: Marisa Knoth [mailto:mknoth@rnhclaw.com] Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 12:02 PM To: Winser, Kristy Cc: John Coughlin Subject: New Cingular Wireless (AT&T) and HetroPCS at Orient by the Sea, 40200 Hain Road, Orient Hi Kristy, I'm sorry to bother you but our clients have been inquiring as to the status of the Town's review of the Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Applications for the subject matter. We are in receipt of your January 27, 2010 correspondence which noted that the applications were being reviewed for completeness. At your convenience, can you please advise the status of the Town's review and provide a timeframe for when the next step will take place. Thank you for your ongoing consideration to this matter! Marisa Knoth RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 (631) 425-4100 (telephone) 2/22/2010 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 January 27,2010 Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP Att: John J. Coughlin 36 North New York Avenue Huntington NY 11743 Re: New Cingular WirelessPCS & Metro PCS, at Orient by the Sea Located at 23300 Main Road, Orient NY SCTM#1000-15-09-8,1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Planning Department is in receipt of the your site plan submission dated January 15, 2010 for the above referenced application and at this time is conducting a review for completeness. Once it has been determined that your file is complete, you will be notified of when the application will be scheduled for a work session. Should you have any questions with regard to the above matter, please contact me anytime. Thank you. Sincerely, Krist Senior Planner" cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & GOUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 80 NORTH NEW YoRs AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORI{ 11743 January 14, 2010 VIA UPS TELEPHONE: (O~l) 425-41OO FAGSIMXLE: (O81) 425~4104 Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Construction of a Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: Orient by the Sea Marina 40200 Main Road (Route 25) Orient, New York SCTM#: 1000-15-9-8.1 Dear Ms. Winser: As you know, we are the attorneys for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ('AT&T') and MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned application, which was filed with your office this moming. Enclosed please find two (2) copies of the FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation issued December 15, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(2). Please incorporate this document into the application package on file with your office. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP JJC:mk Enclosures Federal Aviation A~nistration Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 Aeronautical Study No. 2009-AEA-3750-OE Issued Date: 12/15/2009 Marc Harris HPC Development, LLC 52 Garden Ave. Wharton, NJ 07885 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Anteuna Tower NY7320 Location: Orient Point, NY ' : Latitude: 41-09-09.57N NAD 83 Longitude: 72-14-39.15W Heights: 80 feet above ground level (AGL) 87 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local govemment body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) because the structure is subject to their licensing authority. Page 1 of 3 If we'can be of further assistanc~lease contact our office at (718) 553-4511~On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2009-AEA-3750-OE. Signature Control No: 668223-120897387 Katie Venticinque Specialist (DNE) Attachment(s) Frequency Data cc: FCC Page 2 of 3 Oquency Data for ASN 2009-AEA-375~E LOW FREQUENCY HIGH FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP ERP UNIT 806 824 MHz 500 W 824 849 MHz 500 W 851 866 MHz 500 W 869 894 MHz 500 W 896 901 MHz 500 W 901 902 MHz 7 W 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W 932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW 935 940 MHz 1000 W 940 941 MHz 3500 W 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W 2305 2310 MHz 2000 W 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W 1730 1740 MHz 61 dBm 2130 2140 MHz 61 dBm Page 3 of 3 Federal Aviation A~nistration Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 Aeronautical Study No. 2009-AEA-3750-OE Issued Date: 12/15/2009 Marc Harris HPC Development, LLC 52 Garden Ave. Wharton, NJ 07885 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77 concerning: ~ Structure: Location: Latitude: Longitude: Heights: Antenna Tower NY7320 Orient Point, NY 41-09-09.57N NAD 83 72-14-39.15W 80 feet above ground level (AGL) 87 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed ol ~tructi:on standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, ~(~tre) met: Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coord'mates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requkes separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concems the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local govemment body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) because the structure is subject to their licensing authority. Page 1 of 3 If we can be of further assistan(]~lease contact our office at (718), 553-4~. On any future correspondence cor~gming this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2009-AEA-3750-OE. Signature Control No: 668223-120897387 Katie Venticinque Specialist (DNE) Attachment(s) Frequency Data cc: FCC Page 2 of 3 LOW FREQUENCY eequency Data for ASN 2009-AEA-37~E HIGH FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP ERP UNIT 806 824 MHz 500 W 824 849 MHz 500 W 851 866 MHz 500 W 869 894 MHz 500 W 896 901 MHz 500 W 901 902 MHz 7 W 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W 932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW 935 940 MHz 1000 W 940 941 MHz 3500 W 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W 2305 2310 MHz 2000 W 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W 1730 1740 MHz 61 dBm 2130 2140 MHz 61 dBm Page 3 of 3 RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & GOUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW I~6 NOItTH NEW YORg HUNTINOTON, N~W Yo~e~r 1174, Lt TELEPHONE: (6131) 425-41OO FAGSI~tXLE: (601) 425-4104 January 14, 2010 BY HAND Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Construction of a Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: Orient by the Sea Marina 40200 Main Road (Rotae 25) Orient, New York SCTM#: 1000-15-9-8.1 Dear Ms. Winser: We are the attorneys for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ('AT&T') and MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned matter. On July 6, 2006, our office, then doing business as Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R~, submitted a Site Plan Application to the Planning Board and a Special Exception/Variance Application to the Zoning Board of Appeals on behalf of AT&T for its proposal to construct a wireless telecommunications facility at the captioned premises. Our office attended several work sessions with the Planning Board regarding the Site Plan Application and on July 9, 2007, the Planning Board issued its State Environmental Quality Review Conditional Negative Declaration (copy attached hereto). On September 24, 2007, the Planning Board issued correspondence stating that the Planning Department would be unable to further process the site plan application due to the enactment of a Town-wide Moratorium affecting all pending wireless telecommunications applications. With the Town's expiration of the moratorium in February 2009 and adoption of the new ordinance affecting Wireless Communications Facilities (and subsequent amendment in October 2009), the project is now proceeding with a slightly modified design from that reflected in our original submission in 2006. There are now two cartier applicants, AT&T and MetroPCS, who are proposing to erect an 80' telecommunications monopole and install their related equipment on the ground at the base of the pole. Town of Southold Planning~oard Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications January 14, 2010 Page 2 of 4 To date, AT&T and MetroPCS have obtained the following approvals in connection with the conditions set forth in the Planning Board's State Environmental Quality Review Conditional Negative Declaration, dated July 9, 2007: 1. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC) Modification Permit, modified December 14, 2009 to reflect the current design and joint application of AT&T and MetroPCS. (Copy enclosed herewith); and 2. Town of Southold Town Board of Trustees Approval of Wetlands Permit, which was approved at the October 21, 2009 public hearing. (Wetland Permit to be released upon the issuance of Planning Board Approval of Site Plan and Special Exception Permit). In order to reactivate the pending Planning Board Application, we have enclosed, herewith, the following list of revised materials reflecting the amended design proposal: With respect to the Site Plan Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application; 2. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Affidavit (as to AT&T); 3. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Affidavit (as to MetroPCS); 4. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Transactional Disclosure Form (as to AT&T); 5. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Transactional Disclosure Form (as to MetroPCS); 6. Original and one (1) copy of Owner's Transactional Disclosure Form; 7. Original and one (1) copy of Owner's Authorization as to AT&T; 8. Original and one (1) copy of Owner's Authorization as to MetroPCS; 9. Original and one (1) copy of Environmental Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated December 15, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(3); 10. Original and one (1) copy of LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting; 11. Seven (7) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC MPE Compliance Assessment and Report, prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group, dated June 18, 2009, demonstrating the project's compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations and providing information on the other carders already located on the facility in accordance with Town Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(6), 280-74B(1)(a) and 250-70J; 12. Seven (7) counterparts of correspondence of William F. Collins, AIA, dated August 7, 2009, documenting the proposed facility's structural compliance with local, state and federal codes in accordance with Town Code Sections 280-74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(b); 13. Seven (7) copies of the following: AT&T's FCC License and MetroPCS's FCC License pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(c). 14. Original and one (1) copy of FAA Notice Criteria Tool, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(2); 15. Two (2) counterparts of Preliminary Visual Impact Analysis, prepared by VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C., dated December 2009, · Town of Southold Planning"l~oard "Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications January 14, 2010 Page 3 of 4 pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(3); 16. Nine (9) counterparts of Vicinity Plan, prepared by Hawkins Webb Jaeger PLLC, dated January 11, 2010, addressing Town Code Sections 280-74C(4), 280-74C(9); 17. Nine (9) sets of Zoning Drawings, including Site Plan and Elevation Drawings, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, dated December 17, 2009, addressing Town Code Sections 280-74C(5), 280-74C(10), 280-74C(11), 280-74C(12), 280-74C(13), 280-133B(1)(f), and 280-133B(1)(g); 18. One (1) CD Rom containing digital files of AT&T's propagation and search ring maps, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(7) and 280-74B(1)(f); 19. One (1) CD Rom containing digital files of MetroPCS's propagation and search ring maps, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(7) and 280-74B(1)(f'); and 20. Four (4) copies of Property Survey, prepared by Hawkins Webb Jaeger PLLC, dated July 2, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(5). We have not included an additional Site Plan Application fee check inasmuch as this filing constitutes a reactivation of the initial application submission made on July 7, 2006 with your office. At that time, DGCR, LLC Check Number 4476 in the amount of $2,520.00 was submitted to the Planning Department for the original Site Plan Application fee (copy of check enclosed herewith). We also submit seven (7) counterparts of the following items, which are now required under Code Section 280-74B, Building Permit Application requirements, but were not required or submitted at the time the Building Permit Application was submitted for the instant proposal: 1. AT&T's Gap and Propagation Maps, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74B(1)(d) and (e); 2. MetroPCS's Gap and Propagation Maps, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74B(1)(d) and (e); 3. AT&T's Search Ring Map, pursuant to Code Section 280-74B(1)(e); 4. MetroPCS's Search Ring Map, pursuant to Code Section 280-74B(1)(e); 5. Affidavit ofAT&T's Radiofrequency Engineer, pursuant to Code Section 280-74B(1)(e); 6. Affidavit of MetroPCS's Radiofrequency Engineer, pursuant to Code Section 280- 74B(1)(e); 7. Copy of Property Deeds, pursuant to Code Section 280-74B(1)(g); 8. Copy of Option and Lease Agreement, between M.G.H. Enterprises and AT&T, dated March 9, 2006, pursuant to Code Section 280-74B(1)(g); and 9. Copy of Communications Site Lease Agreement, between M.G.H. Enterprises and MetroPCS dated June 3, 2009, pursuant to Code Section 280-74B(1)(g). With regard to the Special Exception Permit Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Wireless Facility Special Exception Application; 2. MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4364 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the Special Exception Application fee, pursuant to Town Code Section 280- Town of Southold Plannin~oard Orient by the Sea - Site Plan/Special Exception Applications January 14, 2010 Page 4 of 4 74A(3); 3. Two (2) copies of Building Department Notice of Disapproval, dated September 29, 2009, and Building Permit Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(1)(a); 4. Two (2) copies of Site Plan Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280_74D(1)(b); 5. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Doug Hall addressing Alternative Sites Considered and Good Faith Effort to colocate on existing towers, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74D(1)(c), 280-74D(2), and 280-74D(4); 6. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Joseph Sweet regarding future co-location, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(2); and 7. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of John Coleman regarding future co-location, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(2). Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: ~ ~ (~ ~hn). Coughlin(~ JJC:mk Enclosures New Y'ork State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One SUNY @ Stony Brook, 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790 - 3409 Phone: (63t) 444-0365 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 Website: wvvw.dec.state.ny.us PERMIT MODIFICATION MGH Enterprises PO Box 333 Orient, NY 11957 December 14, 2009 Re: Orient by the Sea Marina property 40200 Main Road ( Rte 25), Orient Point, NY Permit # 1-4738-00898/00018 Dear MGH Enterprises; Your request to modify the above permit has been reviewed pursuant to 6NYCRR Part 621 (Uniform Procedures Regulations). It has been determined that the proposed modifications will not substantially change the scope of the permitted actions or the existing permit conditions. Therefore, the permit is modified to authorize: Modification of the design of the proposed facility as shown on plans by William F. Collins Architects, last revised 7~29/09, NYSDEC stamped approved on 12/14/09. This letter is a modification to the original permit, and as such, shall be available at the job site whenever authorized work is in progress. All other terms and conditions remain as written in th cc: file BMHP Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP Deputy Permit Administrator Ne~ York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One SUNY @ Stony Brook, 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790 - 3409 Phone: (631) 444-0365 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny, us PERMIT MODIFICATION Orient by the Sea Marina PO Box 303 Orient, NY 11957 September 4, 2007 Re: Orient by the Sea Marina property 40200 M¢in Road ( Rte 25), Odent Point, NY Permit # 1-4738-00898/00018 Dear Orient by the Sea Marina; Your request to modif7 the above permit has been reviewed pursuant to 6NYCRR Part 621 (Uniform Procedures Regulations). It has been determined that the proposed modifications will not substantially change the scope of the permitted actions or the existing permit conditions. Therefore, the permit is modified to authorize: Relocation of the proposed facility on the premises as shown on plans by William F. Collins Architects, lest revised 8!22J07, NYSDEC stam. ped approved on 9/4/07. This letter is a modification to the odginal permit and as such, shall be ava lable at tbe--ie~Ji~e.whenever · authorized work is in progress. / ' ~ AIl other terms and conditions remain as wdtten in th~a~it./ ~% cc: file BMHP Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re ~ SITE PL'"~-' ,IM ENSIONS r ~ --~ ' ' ~ u ' DESCRIPTION OF DIMENSION - {ALL START FROM CENTER OF POLE) DIMENSION ~ ~. FROM F~GPOLE TO WESTERN PROPER~ LiNE · 21'-6" PROPOSED TELCO CONDUIT o 5. FROM F~GPOLE TO BACK OF STOOGE BUILDING g 6. FROM F~GPOLE TO SOUTH~ST SACK OF PROPER~ · 2~,'-11" EX]STING TRANSFORMER, N ~ 7 / - ~ ~ 10 FROM F~GPOLE TO NORTHERN RESIDE~IAL LOT (RO~E ,, 11 FROM F~POLE TO EXISTING ~OAT ~UNCH RAMP c.c., ~P. OF (2~) PROPOSEDsT~N~U CONDUIT TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM EXl TILIT7 POLE #35 ON ROUTE 25 TO PROPOSED OSC CABINET ~ PROPOSED ELECTRIC CONDUIT TRENCHED UNDERGROUND ' FROM EXISTING TRANSFORMER TO PROPOSED CINGULAR '--" ._.. EXI~NTREES' PROPOSED 1500 WA~ F~GPOLE LIGHT FIGURE . ELECTRICAL PANELS ~OUNTED ON ' ~p ~EQUIPMENT P~TFORM HANDRAIL~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~B7'--O ~ AGL ~ ~/~,~ ~,~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED CINGU~R PROPOSED CINGU~R EQUIPME~ CABIN~ ~ g MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ANTENNA CAB~ RACK I ) ~ .2'--8". - ~ ~':~'~'-~',~-6" ~'-6'~ ~ I ~ ~]~ ~ ~PROPOSED CIN~U~ 12'-0 HIGH CHNNLJN~ HIGH CHAINLINK ~g: ~ ~~~]' ~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~]CE BRIDGING ViRG~NIANA ~ ~e~J { ~ -- J I ,I ~ m { ~ ~/// ~ ~' ~ ~14'--0"'~' AGL I / ~N~S MOUNTED ON PROPOSED 7' o" o c ~ / /~/,>~U ~ - ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ / / / ~ ~ ~ T,O. PROPOSED ~ J I E~ATED GALVANIZED STEEL ~.~- ~ ~ ~- ~ ~_ ~ u~9~_ ~ ~ ~ ~, BRIDGING CAB~ T~Y EQUIPMENT P~ORM HAND~ T~Y ICE BRIDGING ~ ~C ~' ~' ~ / / / ~. ~ ~ (6) PROPOSED OlNGU~R A~ENN~ MOUSED / / / PROPOS~ E~C~IO OONDU~~ ~ -_ PROPOSED CINGU~ 100'-0 HIG~ RF ~GPOLE LIG~ ~Rg ~ 0'--0"~ C PAFITIAL SITE PLAN , --T--,-- TeLDO CONDU t NOTe: UNDERGROUND PROM eXISTIMG ..... S¥ Ot, S TO ADJACENT ~H{C SCA~. ~-- ~ .o.m ~ST ELEVATION csc ORIENT BY THE S~ RETAU~NT ~ /m ~~ ~iNGU~R WIRELLsS PCS, LLC. WILLIA~ F. COLL'NS, AIA "YCENY1059 /U-1059 '~ 2 ' DFN.ST,~I~,~.OZ] .~,~ 22 x 34 SIZE ' New York State Departr~t of Environmental Conser~ion .,r Division of Environmental Permits, Region One SUNY @ Stony Brook, 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790 - 3409 Phone: (631) 444-0363 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us Denise M. Sheehan Commissioner December I8, 2006 Orient by the Sea Marina P.O. Box 303 Orient, N.Y. 11957 Re: Permit #1-4738-00898/00018 Dear P ermittee: In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures Act (Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621) we are enclosIng your permit. Please carefully read all permit conditions and special permit conditions contained in the permit to ensure compliance during the term of the permit. If you are unable to comply with' any conditions, please contact us at the above address. Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted at the project site and protected from the weather. Sincerely, Kendall P. Klett Enviromental Analyst Enclosure .... ' NEW YOP~STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEC. PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-00898/O0018 FACILITY/PROGRAM NUMBER(S) PERMIT Under the Environmental Conservation Law iERVATION EFFECTIVE DATE December 18, 2006 EXPIRATION DATE(S) December 18, 2011 TYPE OF PERMIT · New [~ Renewal D Modification [] Permit to ConstnJct m Permit to Operate DArticle 15, Title 5: Protection of Waters BI Article 15, Title 15: Water Supply [] Article 15, Title 15: Water Transport [] Article 15, Title 15: Long Island Wells r~ Article 15, Title 27: Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers [] 6NYCRR 608: Water Quality Certification · PERMIT ISSUED TO Orient by the Sea Madna ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE [] Article 17, Titles 7, 8: SPDES [] Article 19: Air Pollution Control [] Article 23, Title 27: Mined Land Reclamation [] Article 24: Freshwater Wetlands · Article 25: Tidal Wetlands ID Article 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360: Solid Waste Mana[lement [3 Article 2~, Title 9; 6NYCRR 373: Hazardous Waste Management [3 Article 34: Coastal Erosion Management [] Article 36: Floodplain Management [] Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37; 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control ITELEPHONE NUMBER (631) 323-2424 P.O. Box 303, Orient, N.Y. 11957 CONTACT PERSON FOR PERMI'F]'ED WORK Roper Reiersen, GeoTrans Inc. 1465 Route 31 , South Annadale, N.J. 05501 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILITY TELEPHONE NUMBER i (908) 730-0014 Qrient by the Sea Marina, 40200 Main Road, Orient Point, N.Y. 11957 COUNTY ITOWN I WATERCOURSE Suffolk Southold INYTM COORDINATES E: N: DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY: Construct telecommunication facility including 100 ft high pole, equipment platform and trenched conduit. All work shall be done in accordance with the attached plans stamped NYSDEC approved on 12/18/06. By a,~nce of this permit, the permi~e~e,.a~r-eee-t~ the permit is contingent upon strict compliance wth the ECL, all ap~f'ca~]~ regulations, the Genera~.Go~ditions specifie"d,,,and any Spec a Conditions included as part of this :)ermit. /' .,." J I~EI~ UT/Y PER MJ'T'",~DM I N ISTJ;~O R: I ADDRESS k/! ,? /J '1 Region1 Headquarte//, ,r--./~__._~,~- . ~. I SUNY~StonyBrge~K, 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY11790 - 3409 A,~./~.H O RIZE D S ,G NAT U F~'E~ ~ J0hnA. Wieland (KPK) I December 18, 2006 ' Parle 1 of 4 " '* NI~ilI~ORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL COf'~LATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. During construction, concrete or leachate shall not escape or be discharged, nor shall washings from transit mix trucks, mixers, or other devices enter tidal wetlands and/or protected buffer areas. 2. Any'debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area and removed to an approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands or protected buffer areas. 3. All areas of soil disturbance resulting from the approved project shall be stabilized with appropriate vegetation (grasses, etc.)immediately following project completion or prior to permit expiration, whichever comes first. Ifthe project site remains inactive for more than 48 hours or planting is impractical due to the season, then the area shall be stabilized with straw or hay mulch or jute matting until weather conditi9ns favor germination. 4. The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined within the project.work area and/or upland areas greater than 100 linear feet from the tidal wetland boundary. 5. All disturbed areas where soit will be temporarily exposed or stockpiled for longer than 48 hours shall be contained by a continuous line of staked haybales / silt curtains (or other NYSDEC approved devices) placed on the seaward side between the fill and the wetland or protected buffer area. Tarps are authorized to supplement these approved methods. 6. AIl erosion control devices shall be maintained in good and functional condition until the project has been completed and the area has been stabilized. 7. No fitl or backfill is authorized by this permit without further written approval from the Department (permit, modification, amendment). 8. No excavation of the beach is authorized for the purpose of obtaining fill or stone material. 9. Disturbance to natural vegetation or topography greater than 25 feet seaward of the approved structure prohibited. 10. Necessary erosion control measures e.g., staked haybales, silt fencing, etc. are to be p!aced on the downslope edge of any disturbed areas. This sediment barrier is to be put in place before any disturbance of the ground occurs and is to be maintained in good and functional condition until thick vegetative cover is established. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-00898/00018 PAGE 2 of 4 ~' ,' ' '" hI~ORK ST,~,TE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL COI',I~/ATION · ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (TITLE 5), 24, 25, 34 AND 6NYCRR PART 6O8 ( TIDAL WETLANDS) If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, or for othe[' purposes, and no claim or right to corn pensation shall accrue from any such damage. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of anywetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. Any material dredged in the conduct of the work herein permitted shall be removed evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across or along the bed of a waterway or floodplain, deposits within any regulatory floodway, or deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway. There shall be no unreasonable interference_with navigation bythe work herein authorized. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation mayrequire, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure orfill and restore the site to its former.condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. If granted under 6NYCRR Part 608, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under Sections 301,302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217) provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifTing that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project, the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and, if required, a survey. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict confo~:mance with the approved plans submit[ed by the applicant or his agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by William F. Collins AIA on 4/27/06. DEC PERMITNUMBER I PAGE 3 of 4 1-4738-00898/00018 I · ' ° ' ' ' ~RK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CON~TION I~FICATION OF OTHER PERMIT1 P..~= OBLIG/[II~NS '- .Iterri .~: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification The permittae, excepting state or federal agencies, expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives, employees, and agents ("DEC") for all claims, suits, actions, and damages, to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in connection with, or operation and maintenance of, the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This !ndemnification does not extend to any claims, suits, actions, or damages to the extent attfibutable to DEC's own negligent or intentional acts or omissions, or to any claims, suits, or actions naming the DEC and adsing under Article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision under federal or state laws. Item B: Perrnittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easements and rights-of-way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Ripertan Rights This permit does not convey to the permittee any dght to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the dpadan dghts of others in order to perform the.permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. GENERAL CONDITIONS General Condition 1: Facility Inspection bythe Department The permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) to determine whether the perrnittee is complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301 and SAPA 401(3). Th~ permit, tee shall provide a person to accompany the Depadment's representati;ze during .an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or factitiy. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. General Condition 2: Relationship of this Permit to other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Deparbnent, issuance of this permit does not modify, Supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of'the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. General Condition 3: Applications for Permit Renewals or Modifications The permittae must submit a separate written application to the Department for renewal, modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Depar[ment requires. Any renewal, modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. The permittae must submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES), Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMF), major Air Pollution Control (APC) and Solid Waste Management Facilities (SWMF); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. Submission of applications for permit renewal or modification are to be submitted to: NYSDEC Regional Permit Administrator, Region 1,SUNY @ Stony Brook, 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790 - 3409 General Condition 4: Permit Modifications, Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the fight to modify, suspend or revoke this permit in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 621. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: a) materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or suppoding papers; b) failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c) exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d) newly discovered material information or a msteria change in environmental conditions, relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e) noncompliance with prev ous y ssued permit conditions, orders of the commissioner, any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department i'elated to the permitted activity. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-00898/0001 PAGE 4 of 4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant July 9, 2007 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises SCTM#: 1000-15-9-8 Location: Approximately 537' e/o Cedar Birch Lane, on the s/s/o New York State Route 25, in Orient SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes (X) No() Description of Action: The proposed action involves a site plan with new construction of a 100' monopole cellular communications tower with Cingular locating antennae at 97'-0" and 87'-0" internally mounted in the tower, the site includes an existing boat marina and restaurant on a 4.7-acre parcel in the Mil Zoning District located approximately 537' e/o Cedar Birch Lane, on the s/s/o/New York State Route 25, in Orient SCTM#10004 5-9-8 Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. .. SEQR Negative Decla n Paqe Two July 9, 2007 No substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels, no substantial increase in solid waste production, potential of erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems will occur as a result of this action. This proposed action will be to build on unoccupied space on a marine zoned parcel with a working marina and restaurant. The property is a working marina and restaurant and does not contain significant vegetation. No significant removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or fauna, no substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, no significant impacts on a significant habitat area, no substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endangered species of animal or plant or the habitat of such a species, and no other significant adverse impacts to natural resources will occur. The proposed action does not appear to affect the current property use for boating, fishing and/or recreation. The impact of the scenic view will be mitigated, as the action proposed is a flagpole with all antennae to be concealed within the monopole structure. The site plan is being processed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Southold Town Code and will require a special exception approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals prior to final site plan approval. Due to the proximity of tidal wetlands, the proposed action will require NYSDEC and Southold Town Trustees approval prior to construction and final site plan approval. The proposed action will not significantly impair the character or quality of important historical, archaeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources of existing community or neighborhood character. No major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy will occur. No known creation of a hazard to human health will occur. The proposed action will not cause a substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The following referred agencies have corresponded and concerns/comments were included in the review as listed below: May 11, 2006, the Southold Town Building Department issued a Notice of Disapproval indicating the proposed construction "requires special exception from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. August 3, 2006, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed the architectural drawings and associated site plan materials and approved the flagpole with the following conditions of "gold globe and red beacon light atop pole" and the Planning Board accepted the comments for the file pending further review and final approval. ' SEQR Negative Declaration Page Three July 9, 2007 August 23, 2006, the New York State Department of Transportation responded by letter with "The scope of the work involved at this location will not have a significant impact on the State Highway System" they also notified us that a Highway Work Permit will be required "if any utility connections, work or vehicle staging will occur" and assigned a Case No. 06-285P and the Planning Board will notify the applicant's agent of the requirements. September 18, 2006, Matthew D. Crane, L.S., of Hawkins, Webb & Jaeger Associates, P.L.L.C., submitted a certification letter indicating construction of the equipment platform will be elevated to 12' and complies with the flood zone designation at the time of a Building Permit Review. September 19, 2006, the Suffolk County Department of Planning responded after review and determined this matter is for "local determination as there appears to be no significant county- wide or inter-community impact(s)" and the Planning Board accepted this pursuant to 239 L & M General Municipal Law. October 2, 2006, Matthew D. Crane, L.S., of Hawkins Webb & Jaeger Associates, P.L.L.C. submitted a second original certification letter indicating construction of the equipment platform will be elevated to 12' and complies with the flood zone designation and the Planning Board accepted this for the file and further compliance review from the Building Department at the time of a Building Permit Review. October 2, 2006, Heather Cusack, Environmental Technician, submitted a memo on Town Trustees letterhead indicating "The proposed 100' monopole cellular communication tower with antennae will require a permit from the Board of Trustees" and seven (7) additional concerns; the Planning Board asked that this be filed for the record. October 5, 2006, the Orient Fire District responded by letter after review for fire access and the Southold Town Planning Board accepted the following recommendations: "Request emergency vehicle access be maintained at least (15) feet in width and at least (15) feet in height, subject to approval by the Fire Inspector, as stated in the Southold Town Code Section 100-235 Access Requirements. Request the applicant, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, if they would consider locating fire emergency communications antennae for the Orient Fire District on the tower if it is needed to provide additional coverage for Orient "; and will incorporate into the final site plan approval. October 11,2006, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals responded with a memo "requesting additional time under SEQRA for receipt and review of an LWRP determination as required under Chapter 268, and, when issued and made a part of the agency files, to allow follow-up review/comments" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepted this request and allocated additional time before issuing the SEQRA determination. October 11,2006, the Suffolk County Department of Planning indicated the "Suffolk County Planning Commission is an interested agency and hence has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency" and the Planning Board accepted this recommendation. SEQR Negative Declaration Pa.qe Four July 9, 2007 October 17, 2006, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation responded by letter that "This Department has no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board Office assuming lead agency for this action" and the Planning Board accepted this recommendation. October 19, 2006, Ryan Dassau of Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re' submitted for review the requested "photos of the premises taken from Gardiner's Bay, thereby providing a southerly view of the proposed area of construction" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepted them for the file record. October 23, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session to review the Planning Department file and requested that the southerly view of the construction site pictures have the proposed tower superimposed and the agent was verbally notified on October 27, 2006. October 30, 2006, Mark Terry, the Southold Town LWRP CoordinatodSenior Environmental Planner, reviewed the proposed action and his determination that '~[he proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the following standards and therefore INCONSISTENT with the LWRP"; the report notes three policies and the Southold Town Planning Board approved of Staff sending the report to the agent for review and mitigation of the polices noted. November 22, 2006, Planning Staff sent a letter including the LWRP Coordinators report to Lawrence C. Re', of Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re', for review. November 28, 2006, Ryan Dassau of Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re', submitted a revised site plan to comply with the LWRP report, dated October 30, 2006, for review and elevation drawings depicting the new location of the proposed flagpole/monopole and the Southold Town Planning Board accepted the proposed plans with the request that various distance dimensions be added to the revised site plan from the boat ramp, bulkheads and wetlands, additionally requesting revised photo simulations of the new proposed tower location prior to a SEQRA determination. November 29, 2006, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the site plan materials and issued comments and the Planning Board accepted the three (3) comments and will incorporate into final site plan approval. December 4, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session to review the Planning Department file and requested various additional information from Ryan Dassau; and December 8, 2006, Ryan Dassau of Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re', submitted for review, in response to the Planning Board request, the following: inventory and corresponding map of existing Cingular sites, search ring and propagation maps and revised site plans depicting additional setbacks and the Southold Town Planning Board accepted them for the file record. December 18, 2006, Ryan Dassau of Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re', submitted 2 copies of the Visual Study prepared by Creative Visual, Inc., dated July 19, 2006, of the proposed action and the Planning Board reviewed the information and requested that a new Visual Study be completed for the new proposed location. . SEQR Negative Declarl~ion Page Five July 9, 2007 December 18, 2006, the NYS DEC issued a permit for the proposed construction under Article 25 Tidal Wetlands Permit Number 1-4738-00898/00018 and the Southold Town Planning Board accepted this approval with one correction that the applicant amends the permit to include the new proposed location of the tower. December 21,2006, the Southold Town Planning Board referred under SEQRA all file information which included the following: revised site plan, Visual Study, Town Engineers comments and LWRP comments to all coordinated agencies. December 29, 2006, the Suffolk County Department of Planning responded that the "Suffolk County Planning Commission has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency" and the Planning Board accepted this recommendation. February 12, 2007, the NYS Office of Parks responded by letter indicating "this agency has no objection to the Town of Southeld Planning Office assuming lead agency", additionally noting "It appears that the Visual Analysis was prepared prior to a shift in project location" and the Planning Board accepted this recommendation. May 14, 2007, Ryan Dassau of Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re', notified the Town that the next Visual Study was scheduled for May 29, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. and the Planning Board will refer this information to all agencies. May 18, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board referred under SEQRA the scheduled Visual Study date to all coordinated agencies. June 14, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Department received the Visual Analysis prepared by Creative Visual, Inc., dated June 2007, and the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the information at the Work Session on June 25, 2007 and requested it be tabled until the next Work Session; and July 2, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Work Session, reviewed the site plan file information and requested that the visual be forwarded to the NYS Office of Parks for review and comments. July 3, 2007, the Southold Town Trustees responded that they are "currently reviewing the proposed 100' monopole cellular communications tower with antennae. The Planning Board will receive a copy of our decision once made. The Board of Trustees reserves the right to make any additional comments regarding this application" and the Planning Board will condition the determination on the proposed construction in the wetland jurisdiction. July 6, 2007, Thomas B. Lyons of the NYS Office of Parks responded by letter with comments and indicated "This agency thus has ne objection to the project as proposed, including lighting to serve as a nautical marker of Orient Point" and the Planning Board accepts this recommendation. There has not been any correspondence received from the referred agencies listed below: · Southold Town Building Department · Southold Town Supervisor · Southold Town Board ,SEQR Negative Declar~ation Page Six July 9, 2007 · Suffolk County Department of Health Services · Suffolk County Water Authority · US Army Corps of Engineers · US Coast Guard Therefore, it is assumed that there are no additional comments or objections from these agencies. The Southold Town Planning Board agrees based upon the information, that no significant adverse impacts to the environment are expected to occur should the project be implemented as planned, however, the Southold Town Planning Board has concerns that the proposed action may create a material conflict with the community's current plans and goals, as officially approved by Southold Town under Town Regulations and issues this Conditioned Negative Declaration with the following three conditions: The applicant/agent or owner must complete the application submission requirements to the Town Zoning Board of Appeals for review and variance relief along with special exception permission for this proposed action. The applicant/agent or owner must complete the application submission requirements to the Town Trustees for review and approval of the wetlands jurisdiction on this proposed action. 3. The applicant/agent or owner must revise and amend the permit approval by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Based upon such, the Conditional Negative Declaration is issued pending approval of the proposed action by the agencies having authority. The Southold Town Planning Board, as required under Town Code Section 280-131 part B (4a) Regulations, will not grant site plan approval prior to the issuance of a special exception by the Zoning Board of Appeals. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Address: Southold Town Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services LWRP Mark Terry NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department US Army Corps of Engineers US Coast Guard New York State Department of Parks/Pamela Otis New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") ~n~Bui~ding Coverage from Surrounding Sites without proposed site L1-1059 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") ~-Bui~dir, g Coverage from proposed site L1-1059 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") ~n-Buildin9 Coverage from Surrounding Sites with proposed site L1-1059 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") ~-Car Coverage from Surrounding Sites without proposed site L1-1059 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") ~-Ca~' Coverage from proposed site L1-1059 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") in-Car Coverage from Surrounding Sites with proposed site L1-1059 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") Ore-Street Coverage from Surrounding Sites without proposed site L1-1059 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") On-Street Coverage from proposed site L1-1059 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") On-Street Coverage from Surrounding Sites with proposed site L1-1059 MetroPCS New York, LLC NY7320 Search Ring Map 0 mi 0.2 0.4 0,6 0~8 SEARCH RING FOR NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC I,-l- 1059 Search ring - Lat: 41.1516, Long -72.2484. 40200 Main Road, Orient Point, NY Orient Point, New York, United States Town of Southold Site iD NY7320A 40200 Route 25 Orient Point, New York Map Scale: 1" = 0.85 mi OcL 23,2009 Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites MAP 1 Prepared by Nico Balzano iO Town of Southold Site iD NY7320A 40200 Route 25 Orient Point, New York Map Scale: '~ '~ = 0.85 mi Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites -85 dBm In Building Residential MAP 2 Proposed Coverage Oct, 23,2009 Prepared by Nico Balzano Town of Southold Site iD NY7320A 40200 Route 25 Orient Point, New York Map Sca~e: t" = 0.85 mi Oct, 23,2009 Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites -75 dBm In Building Commercial MAP 3 Proposed Coverage Prepared by Nico Balzano i© Town of $outhold Site ~D NY7320A 40200 Route 25 Orient Point, New York Map Scale: t" = 0.85 mi Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites -95 dBm In Vehicle MAP 4 Proposed Coverage Oct. 23,2009 Prepared by Nice Balzano TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location AT&T and MetroPCS at Site Plan Name: Orient By the Sea Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 15 - 9 8.1 Application Date: Other SCTM #s: ol / 14 / 2010 Street Address: 40200 Main Road (a/k/a S.R. 25)Hamlet:' Orient Distance to nearest intersection: 400 feet east of Cedar Beach Road Type of Site Plan: X New Amended If Amended, last approval date: / / Residential SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number.~ the peopte below: Property Owner MGH Enterprises, Inc. Street P;~O. Box 333 City Orient State NY Zip. Home Telephone Other ** **See Addendum A for Applicants: (_1) H.ew ~ingu]? ~jreless. PCS, LLC - Co-Applicant Street 333 Crossways Park Drive City__Woodbu ry ..State NY _Zip 117971 Home Telephone 516-677-6503 Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: ContactPerson(s)* RE, NIELSEN., HUBER, & COUGHLIN,: LLP Street 36 North New York Avenue, City_ Huntington State NY .Zip 11743 Office Telephone 631-425-4100 Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence w/A1 be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: X;- New Property total acreage or square footage: Modification of Existing Structure Change of use 4.55 ac./sq, ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 5700 .aa./sq. ft. __Agricultural Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ If yes, explain: No Property Zoning District(s): MII- Marine II Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 09 / 29 / £009 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes __ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No X Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: List all existing property uses: Restaurant and Marina List ali proposed property uses: Existing storage building 5 . 036 % Proposed lot coverage:. Gross floor area of existing structure(s):_ +3750 Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications~Facility ±.040 % _sq. ft. Grossfloor areaofproposedstmcture(s): ±404 sq. ft. Parking Space Data: #of existing spaces: 75 # of proposed spaces: 0 Loading Berth: Yes __ No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: ±10 % Proposed landscape coverage:_ ± 10 Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500' of a wetland area? Yes X __ No If yes explain: I, theandersigned, certify that all the ~gve information is true. ** See Addendum A for signature of New~ing~ar~ PCS, LLC Co-Applicant Signature of Preparer: By: [ ~_.lht~ 0~1 Date: ~t~-"~°~ Syst~x~velopment M~n~a~j~r~ v~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION Premises: 40200 Main Road Orient, NY SCTM#: 1000 - 15 - 9 - 8.1 As to Co-Applicant (2): MetroPCS New York, LLC 5 Skyline Drive Hawthorne, New York 10532 914-593-8500 ADDENDUM "A" Signature of Co-Applicant: Dan Olmetti NY VP/GM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD WIRELESS FACILITY SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION Application Name (use same name as Site Plan App icat on Narn'~): AT&T and MetroPCS at Orient By The Sea Application Date: January / 14 /20 10 Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000 - 15 9 Other SCTM#'s: Street Address: 40200 Main Road Hamlet: Orient Checklist of application materials required to be submitted (see Special Exception Application Requirements Handout or {}280-74 D. of the Southold Town Code for details) J' One copy of the building permit application materials / Complete site plan application submission ~/' One copy of the deed or lease agreement for the use of the property Analysis of site location alternatives J Effort to co-locate documentation (if this is not a co-location) Propagation maps showing existing facilities and service in the town v// Evidence supporting existence of inadequate service Special Exception Application Fee form updated 5/4/2009 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC, At the premises: 40200 Main Road (a/k/a S.R.25) South side of Main Road, 400 feet east of Cedar Beach Road Orient, New York District 1000 Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 : AUTHORIZATION OF OWNER STATE OF NEW YORK ) )SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) _, being duly sworn, deposes and says: of MGH Enterprises, Inc., owner in fee of the premises known as District 1000, Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 (the "Premises" hereafter), and do hereby authorize MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS' hereafter), and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal approvals as may be necessary for constructing or installing on the Premises such antennas, support structures, and related equipment as MetroPCS may require for the establishment of its public utility wireless telecommunication facility. As such, I will fully cooperate with MetroPCS and its agents in obtaining any required Approvals. Sworn to before me this day of ~ NO~Y PUBLIC MGH F¢a~rprises, Inc. By: APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics orohibits com~licts of interest on the oart of town officers and emdlovees. The oumose of this form is to ~rovide information which can alert the town of gossible conflicts of interest and allow it to t~e whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOURNAIVIE: MGH Enterprises. Inc, (Last name, ffist name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other", name the activity.) ~n Approval and Special Exception Permit Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation ~n which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agenffrepresentative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); ___C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or ___D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS 1 Submitted this ~day of /'~ ct 5/ 200 c~ Signature /~,~-/' I/o~-,~ Print Name l &o~ ~OqSe APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the tmrt of town officers and emt~lovees. The tmmose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of ~ossible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessarv to avoid same. YOUR NAME: MetroPCS New York, LLC (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If "Other", nme the activity.) ~n Approval and Special Exception Permit Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parem, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interesf' means a business, including a par~ership, in which the tom officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); ___C) an officer, director, panner, or employee of the applicant; or ___D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS 1 Submitte~dfi~t~y of SignatureX.~ _~ Print Name r-~ __ .-~ · ~-'-~7 I.~1 I ~1~ NY VP/( ,, 200 Dan Olmetti NY VP/GM APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics ~rohibits conflicts of interest on the ~art of town officers and employees. The ~umose of this form is to ~rovide information which can alert the town of oossible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. ¥OLr~NAlvlE: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (Last name, first name, middle init/M, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Vatiance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Platming Other (If "Other", name the activity.) ~n Appr6val and Special Exception P~rmit Do you personally (or through yoar company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agentYrepre sentative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): __A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); __.B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); __.C) an officer, director, parmer, or employee of the applicant; or __.D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS 1 Submitted }l~is ~d J 200 Signature I ~ ~/\ ~ PrintN~pl~xSw9~, System Development Manager AppUCANITS AFRDAV1T :STATE OF NEW YORK COU~ OF SUFFOLK ~E)~-~' 0\ ~rk4'--~, ', being duly sworn, deposes and says that· he resides at c/o 5 Skyline.Driy. e,~ Hawthorne, NY 10532 in the state, of New YOrk, and t~hat he is ~ne owner of the. above property, or that he is the of the LesseeJ MetroPCS New York,.LLC' ~-~ OFItie) (Spe~tfy whether Partlqershlp or Corp.) which is hereby making application~ that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on'the Site Plan; that the tltie to the entire parcel, lncludlng all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan tnfdBges upon any duly flied plan which has not been abandoned both as ~o lots andes to roads;'that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; U~at the plans submiL-ted, as approved; will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of' the Planning Board;~d thau the actual onysical ImprovementS will be Installed In ~trict accordance With the Signed - - (Owner) MetroPCS New York, LLC Signed By: n~,~ ~,.~,~; (Partner or ~2009 APPLICANPS AFFIDAVIT :STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Joseph Sweet being duJy sworn, deposes and says that' he resides at 'c/o 333 Crosswa~/s P. ar~k Drive, Woodbur.y, NY 11797 .- in the State of New YORK, and that he Js the owner of the above properly, or that he is the System Development Mana.qe~Df the Les~eeZ New ¢ingulaN Wir¢l~ pC.$~_LLC tTitle) {Spectfy whether Partnership or Corp,) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or ImprovementS on the land which are not shown on'the Site Pi'an; that the titJe to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan tnfrl~]ges upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned boUi 'as to lots andes to roads;'that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the firing of site plans and will comply with same; that the plans submit-ted, as approved; will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of' the Planning Board; and that the ac~al physical mprovementS will be plans submi~ed. Signed (Owner) - Nev/..Ci ng Signed B~.~ aosd~h ~, SW~.~qg~O me~,' I,~" 'day of / veet, System Development Hanager ns~a ed n strict accordance ' ' , Victoria I~'ennan, Esq Notary Public; State of New York No. 02BR6072822 Qualified in Nassau County Commissio~ ®xpims April 15, 2010 PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC, For Special Exception Permit Approval to erect a public utility wireless telecommunications stealth monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 40200 Main Road (a/k/a S.R.25), Orient, New York District 1000 Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF ) COLOCATION AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO TOWN CODE SECTION 280-74D(2) John Coleman, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am the Site Development Manager for MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS") and am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances hereinafter set forth. The business address of MetroPCS is 5 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, New York 10532. 3. I make this affidavit pursuant to Town of Southold Code Section 280-74D(2). 4. The proposed stealth monopole will be capable of accommodating colocation of additional antennas for future users. Sworn to,, pefore me this ~3 _~* day of / v0~4, r~g,e~ ., 2~9. NOTARY PUBMC John Coleman PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF gOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC, For Special Exception Permit Approval to erect a public utility wireless telecommunications stealth monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 40200 Main Road (a/k/a S.R.25), Orient, New York District 1000 Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF ) COLOCATION AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO TOWN CODE SECTION 280-74D(2) Joseph Sweet, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am the System Development Manager for New Cingular Wireless pCS, LLC ("AT&T") and am fully familiar with the facts and cimumstances hereinafter set forth. 2. The business address of AT&T is 333 Crossways Park Drive, Woodbury, New York 11797. 3. I make this affidavit pursuant to Town of Southold Code Section 280-74D(2). 4. The proposed stealth monopole will be capable of accommodating colocation of additional antennas for future users. Sworn to before me this '?---~ day of ~J 1} I/- ,2009. LAWRENCE C. RE' Notary Public, State of New York No. 52..4799664 Oualified in Suffolk Courlty Commission Expires May 31 i<,'Pl I _ PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD cOUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC, For Special Exception Permit Approval to erect a public utility wireless telecommunications stealth monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 40200 Main Road (a/k/a S.R.25), Orient, New York, District 1000 Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 AFFIDAVIT OF GOOD FAITH EFFORT AND SITE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED PURSUANT TO TOWN CODE SECTIONS 280- 74D(1)(c) and 280-74D(2) STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) DOUG HALL, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a Site Acquisition Consultant representing New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CCingular") and MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS") in the Long Island market (Cingular and MetroPCS are hereinafter collectively referred to ds the "Carriers"). The Carriers are both licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to construct, operate and maintain a personal wireless telecommunications system in Suffolk County and throughout much of the United States. 2. In my capacity as Site Acquisition Consultant, I was tasked with finding a suitable location for a public utility wireless telecommunications facility within a specific area (near Orient Point) in Southold defined by the Carriers' radio frequency engineers. 3. In keeping with the purpose and intent of Chapter 280 of the Code of the Town of Southold, the Carriers seek to locate their facilities on an existing building or structure located within an area of Southold, in which there is a significant service gap. 4. I have exercised a good faith effort to secure a lease agreement for the Carriers in the Town of Southold to locate or co-locate on an existing tower or other available and appropriate buildings or structures, pursuant to Southold Code Sections 280-74D(1)(c) and 280- 74D(2). 5. The Carriers' radio frequency engineers determined that none of the existing buildings or structures lying in the subject search area would be suitable for a facility that would be capable of eliminating the coverage gap in the area because each fails to meet the minimum height requirement. 6. The Carriers' radio frequency engineers ascertained that the installation of public utility wireless telecommunications antennas within the proposed monopole at the Premises would serve to eliminate the coverage gap in the area. 7. The Premises was chosen as the optimal site for which a lease agreement could be secured, while still meeting the applicable Town Code requirements and the Carriers' radio frequency objectives in the subject search area. The stealth monopole design will have limited visual impact on the surrounding area. The design provides the opportunity for co-location by the Carriers on the same stealth monopole, and includes room for potential future co-location. Furthermore, the proposed landscaping at the Premises will help to minimize the visual impact that the proposed equipment would have on the surrounding community. Sworn to before me this \~J/t~lay of October, 2009. ~-~~ Victoria E~-ennan, Esq Notary Public, State of New York No. 02BR6072822 (:3emmi~ea expires Apm ~ ~, ~v. v PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC, For Special Exception Permit Approval to erect a public utility wireless telecommunications stealth monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 40200 Main Road (a/k/a S.R.25), Orient, New York, District 1000 Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 [MetroPCS Site No. NY 7320] STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) AFFIDAVIT OF RADIO FREQUENCY ENGINEER NICHOLAS BALZANO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer for MetroPCS New York, LLC (hereinafter "MetroPCS"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in MetroPCS wireless telecommunications network and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy these service deficiencies. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. I am fully familiar with MetroPCS' wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of MetroPCS' application for approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. Pursuant to this application, the applicants request approval to erect a telecommunications monopole, with antennas therein, and install their related equipment on the ground at the base of the pole as depicted in the plans previously submitted to the Board. 3. MetroPCS is considered a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of New York and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to serve the public within Suffolk County and throughout much of the United States. MetroPCS strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage area. 4. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications network throughout Suflblk County. Presently, MetroPCS does not maintain any facilities within the Town of Southold. The proposed facility will allow MetroPCS to provide reliable coverage in the vicinity of the proposed site. Unreliable service can represent an inconvenience to users of MetroPCS' services and can have serious consequences during times of emergency or disaster. 5. In order to understand why the proposed antenna site is needed, it is necessary to understand how MetroPCS' system works from an engineering standpoint. MetroPCS' wireless telecommunications system is designed so that low powered base stations are strategically located at determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. Due to such factors as hills, valleys, trees, buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves, each coverage area or "cell" is irregularly shaped. With sufficient signal strength from each base station, the MetroPCS user can reliably transmit, receive or maintain voice or data connections. The sites are ordinarily engineered to cover a limited area so that an antenna facility will cover only the area surrounding it but will not interfere with other sites in the system. 6. MetroPCS has established design criteria so that its wireless network will provide reliable wireless service to its customers, whether those customers are on the street, in a vehicle, or in a building. Providing reliable service to MetroPCS' customers within vehicles and buildings is critical for MetroPCS to provide the quality of wireless service that customers demand and successfully compete with other wireless providers. 2 7. To meet customer demands and expectations, MetroPCS strives to provide In- Vehicle (or In-Car) coverage and In-Building coverage. Ihese coverage levels represent the minimum signal strength and reliability of service needed to transmit, receive or maintain a voice or data connection at the mobile handset as the environment changes. 8. MetroPCS has reliable In-Vehicle coverage when a customer can place or receive a call within a vehicle successfully across 95% of a site's coverage area. In-Vehicle coverage generally results in unreliable in-building coverage. Since the signal level is stronger closer to the antenna site than further away from the antenna site, there will be some coverage within buildings close to the site. 9. MetroPCS has reliable In-Building Residential coverage when a MetroPCS customer can place or receive a call while in a building that is three stories or less in height successfully across 95% of the site's coverage area. This type of coverage will typically provide reliable coverage over the majority of the cell coverage area; however in some areas, and specifically at the outer geographic boundaries of the cell site's coverage area, coverage will be restricted and will likely lead to customers dissatisfaction if customers try to place or receive a call inside a windowless room, cellars or emergency shelters. 10. MetroPCS has reliable In-Building Commemial overage when a MetroPCS customer can place or receive a call while in a building that is greater than three stories in height successfully across 95% of the site's coverage area. In-Building Commercial coverage is targeted for urban residential centers and business districts with high-rise buildings, and suburban business centers. Coverage issues may still occur in hard to serve locations such as within elevators and parking structures. l 1. To provide these levels of coverage, MetroPCS has scientifically determined the strength of the wireless signal ("signal strength") necessary to provide these levels of coverage. Because wireless signals are attenuated (i.e. degraded or partially blocked) by obstructions such as trees, automobile windows, automobile sheet metal, and building materials such as wood, brick and metal, a wireless signal must be of sufficient strength in the ambient environment (i.e. outside with no obstructions) to reliably penetrate into automobiles and buildings. 12. Wireless signal strength is measured on a logarithmic power scale referenced to 1 milli-watt of power. Signal strength levels less than 1 milli-watt being negative. The smaller the negative dBm number, the stronger the signal. For example, -75dBm is a stronger signal level than -85dBm. An ambient signal level of-95dBm would provide reliable In-Vehicle coverage on MetroPCS' system. MetroPCS' system requires an ambient signal level of-85dBm to provide reliable In-Building Residential coverage, and an ambient signal level of-75dBm to provide reliable In-Building Commercial coverage. These signal level requirements provide the basis for MetroPCS' design criteria. 13. MetroPCS' design criteria for wireless facilities serving an area are based upon providing 95% reliable signal over a site's coverage area to ensure reliable service for customers. This standard reflects a business judgment that 100% reliability is an unrealistic goal at this time due to financial, technical and environmental constraints. A 95% level of reliability is consistent with the level of service provided by MetroPCS' competitors and is the standard in the industry. Providing service at this level allows MetroPCS to satisfy customers' demands and compete on an equal footing with competitors serving the market. 14. To achieve the 95% reliable design goal, MetroPCS conducts extensive analysis based upon MetroPCS' technology and the area served. 4 15. In order to eliminate the service deficiency in a particular area, MetroPCS perfomqs signal propagation studies to determine the height and location of the needed cell site. Based on its studies, MetroPCS determined that an antenna facility would have to be established within a narrowly defined search area in order to remedy the service gap in question. In this case, we determined that the installation of the proposed facility will allow MetroPCS to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 16. The proposed antennas must be affixed at least as high as those depicted on the plans previously submitted to the Board in order to ensure that reliable service can be afforded to MetroPCS users in the vicinity of the site. The location and height of the antennas is determined by some or all of the following factors: availability of existing structures, willingness of property owners to enter into leases, drive test data, location of existing antenna sites in the area, topography in the surrounding area, land cover features in the area such as buildings and foliage, and the results provided by computer propagation software that enables radio frequency engineers to predict the anticipated signal propagation at a given height and location. 17. In order to illustrate the effect that the proposed site would have on coverage in its vicinity, propagation maps have been prepared demonstrating the different coverage levels summarized above. The maps depict the area to be served by the proposed site. As the maps indicate, the proposed facility is of vital importance to MetroPCS' efforts to provide reliable service to the area in question. Unless this application is granted, MetroPCS will be unable to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 18. The antennas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service or public safety telecommunications in the surrounding area. 5 Sworn to before me this ~/~dayof C2£&o~-~.~ ,2009. NOTAR~Y~PUBLiC DIANE LAVELLE NOTARY PUBLIC, State O! New York No. 01 LA6027870 Qualified In Westchester County I~ommission Expires July 19, 20 ~_..'3 IOTAS BALZANO PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC, For Special Exception Permit Approval to erect a public utility wireless telecommunications stealth monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 40200 Main Road (a/kJa S.R.25), Orient, New York, District 1000 Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 COUNTY OF ,/~,)~-~,-f~ _ ) AFFIDAVIT OF RADIO FREQUENCY ENGINEER being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (hereinafter "Cingular"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in Cingular's wireless telecommunications network and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy these service deficiencies. I am fully familiar with Cingular's wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of Cingular's application for approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. Pursuant to this application, the applicants request approval to erect a telecommunications monopole, with antennas therein, and install their related equipment on the ground at the base of the pole as depicted in the plans previously submitted to the Board. 3. Cingular is considered a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of New York and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to serve the public within Suffolk County and lhroughout much of the United States. Cingular strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage area. 4. At present, there is a subslantial service gap in Cingular's wireless network coverage in the vicinity of the proposed site. A service gap exists if the user of a Cingular mobile telephone cannot reliably transmit, receive or maintain a voice or data connection. The service gap in coverage that now exists in the vicinity of the proposed site prevents Cingular from providing reliable service in the area. This unreliability represents an inconvenience to users of Cingular's services and can have serious consequences during times of emergency or disaster. 5. In order to understand why the proposed antenna site is needed, it is necessary to understand how Cingular's system works from an engineering standpoint. Cingular's wireless telecommunications system is designed so that low powered base stations are strategically located at determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. Due to such factors as hills, valleys, trees, buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves, each coverage area or "cell" is irregularly shaped. With sufficient signal strength from each base station, the Cingular user can reliably transmit, receive or maintain voice or data connections. The sites are ordinarily engineered to cover a limited area so that an antenna facility will cover only the area surrounding it but will not interfere with other sites in the system. 6. Cingular has established design criteria so that its wireless network will provide reliable wireless service to its customers, whether those customers are on the street, in a vehicle, or in a building. Providing reliable service to Cingular's customers within vehicles and buildings is critical for Cingular to provide the quality of wireless service that customers demand and successfully compete with other wireless providers. 7. To meet customer demands and expectations, Cingular strives to provide both In- Vehicle (or In-Car) coverage and In-Building coverage. These coverage levels represent the minimum signal strength and reliability of service needed to transmit, receive or maintain a voice or data connection at the mobile handset as the environment changes. 8. Cingular has reliable In-Vehicle coverage when a customer can place or receive a call within a vehicle successfully across 95% of a site's coverage area. In-Vehicle coverage generally results in unreliable in-building coverage. Since the signal level is stronger closer to the antenna site than further away from the antenna site, there will be some coverage within buildings close to the site. 9. Cingular has reliable In-Building coverage when a Cingular customer can place or receive a call while in a building that is three stories or less in height successfully across 95% of the site's coverage area. This type of coverage will typically provide reliable coverage over the majority of the cell coverage area; however in some areas, and specifically at the outer geographic boundaries of the cell site's coverage area, coverage will be restricted and will likely lead to customers dissatisfaction if customers try to place or receive a call inside a windowless room, elevators, parking stmctures, cellars or emergency shelters. 10. To provide these levels of coverage, Cingular has scientifically determined the strength of the wireless signal ("signal strength") necessary to provide In-Vehicle coverage and In-Building coverage. Because wireless signals are attenuated (i.e. degraded or partially blocked) by obstructions such as trees, automobile windows, automobile sheet metal, and building materials such as wood, brick and metal, a wireless signal must be of sufficient strength in the ambient environment (i.e. outside with no obstructions) to reliably penetrate into automobiles and buildings. 11. Wireless signal strength is measured on a logarithmic power scale referenced to 1 milli-watt of power. Signal strength levels less than I milli-watt being negative. The smaller the negative dBm number, the stronger the signal. For example, -75dBm is a stronger signal level than -85dBm. An ambient signal level of-95dBm would provide reliable On-Street coverage. Cingular's system requires an ambient signal level of-85dBm to provide reliable In-Vehicle coverage, and an ambient signal level of-75dBm to provide reliable In-Building coverage. These signal level requirements provide the basis for Cingular's design criteria. 12. Cingular's design criteria for wireless facilities serving an area are based upon providing 95% reliable signal over a site's coverage area to ensure reliable service for customers. This standard reflects a business judgment that 100% reliability is an unrealistic goal at this time due to financial, technical and environmental constraints. A 95% level of reliability is consistent with the level of service provided by Cingular's competitors and is the standard in the industry. Providing service at this level allows Cingular to satisfy customers' demands and compete on an equal footing with competitors serving the market. 13. To achieve the 95% reliable design goal, Cingular conducts extensive analysis based upon Cingular's technology and the area served. 14. In order to eliminate the service deficiency in a particular area, Cingular performs signal propagation studies to determine the height and location of the needed cell site. Based on its studies, Cingular determined that an antenna facility would have to be established within a narrowly defined search area in order to remedy the service gap in question. In this case, we determined that the installation of the proposed facility will allow Cingular to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 4 15. The proposed antennas must be affixed at least as high as those depicted on the plans previously submitted to the Board in order to ensure that reliable service can be afforded to Cingular users in the vicinity of the site. The location and height of the antennas is determined by some or all of the following factors: availability of existing structures, willingness of property owners to enter into leases, drive tesl data, location of existing antenna sites in the area, topography in the surrounding area, land cover features in the area such as buildings and foliage, and the results provided by computer propagation software that enables radio frequency engineers to predict the anticipated signal propagation at a given height and location. 16. In order to illustrate the effect thal the proposed site would have on coverage in its vicinity, propagation maps have been prepared demonstrating the different coverage levels summarized above. The maps depict the areas presently enjoying reliable service in the vicinity, and the area to be served by the proposed site. As the maps indicate, the proposed facility is of vital importance to Cingular's efforts to provide reliable service to the area in question. Unless this application is granted, Cingular will be unable to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 17. safety telecommunications in the surrounding area. The antennas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service or public ~ ~ ~'. ~TA~ ~ '.~ ~ S w~ to before ~ of 2009. 2 : - V: _~_ ~e~ .~ · ~mllne ~ ~r~on ~OIIIIllllli~ My ~ml{{i~n Expires SI71~11 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: October 17, 2011 TO: Re: Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP for New Cingular Wireless LLC 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 OCT 1 8 2011 Please.take notice that your application dated September 29, 2011 For permit to install a wireless comm. tower & equipment at Location of property: 40200 Main Rd., Orient, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 15 Block 9 Lot 8.1 Is rctumed herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction in the Mil District is not permitted pursuant to Article XVll Section 280-700)(3), which states: "Minimum distance of all wireless equipment to adjacent residential property lines shall be no less than 500 feet.. The proposed construction requires Planning Board site plan review & special exception approval per Section 280-70B of the Town Code. Authorized Signature CC: file, ZBA, & Planning Board Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net Exaraincd ,20 Approved ,20 Expiratic SEP, 2o 2011 BLDG DEPT PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Do you have or riced the following, befer* applying? Board of Health 4 sets ~BuIlding ~ Planning Beirut approval Sun, O,. Ch~ok S~ptic Form N.Y.$.D,E,C. Trustee~ Flood Permit Storm-Water Ass~sm~nt Form Con,et Att?racy for Applicant:. . Mail to: Re; Nielsen, Hllber& Coughlin, LLP 36 N. New York Ave., Huntington, NY 11743 Phone: 631-425~100 Building Impcctor HCATION FOR BUN,DING PERMIT ~STRU~ONS a. This application MUST be ~omplotoly filled in by typewriter or ia ink and submitted to the Building lml~otor with 4 · sets of plans, accomte pict plan to scale. Fe~ a~cording to ~hoduie. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premis~, relationship to adjoining pmmi~ or PUblic streets or areas, and waterways. ¢. The work covered by this applicailon may not be commenced before iasus, nue of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Stwh a permit shall be kept on the premis~ available for inspu~un throughout the work. e. No building shall be oc~upiad or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire Lfthe work authorized Ires not commenced within 12 months at~er the date of issuance or has not been complot~xl within 18 month~ from such ~to. fine zoning amandments or crier mguiatiun~ affo~ling tho property have been anacted in tho interim, the Buil-ding Ir~po~tor may authori~, in writing; the oxtex~ion ofth~ p~mit for an addition six months. Thorea~er, a now permit shall b~ required. APPLICATION 1S HEREBY MADE to the Building Dcpar~ont for thc issuance of a Building P~mit pumuant to the Building Zone Ordinanc~ of the Town of $outhold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinanco~ or Reguialions, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alte~tiom or for removal or demoliliun a~ heroin d~.~ib~d. The applicant agrees to comply with all applimble laws. ordinances, building cod~, homing code, and r~guiafiom, and to admit authorized inspectors on pmmise~ and in building for n~.~ry insp~dom. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (8'~mlur~ of ~plio~g or mm~ ifc c~poralion) 1444 E. Jericho Turnpike, Huntington, NY 11743 State whether applicant is owner, losse~, stem, archit, ct, engineer, general contractor, do~trician, plumier or builde~ Applicant is Lessee Name of owner ofpremise~ M.G.H. Enterprises, Inc. t~ ~.&~on tho tax roll or lama d_~d) a 'c t i ' 'gnatum orizcd officer (Name and title of corp~¢~J Joseph Sweet, Syste~ Developmen~U~ager Builders License No. ~. ~ Plumbcm Li~nse No. N/A Elec~ici~s Li~nse No. Other T~,'s License No. 1. Localjon of land on which proposlxl work will be done: ~1~ ~e~fion 15 Bilk Subdivision Orient Hamlet 9 Filed Map No. Lot , 8.t Lot Stat~ existing use and occgpancy.ofpremises and intended usc and occupancy of proposed construction: a. E~is~il'lg.~ae a~[ o~otlpancy Resmurunt and Marina ' "Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility b. Inte~d use and o~cupancy 3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Repair RemOVal . . Demolition ~ ~ono~ole, ~nstall public utility wi~e~eg's telecommuffications antennas therein, 0~. osori.l~i.on) tnd ~n~a~rl nela~j~a equipment~o-n ground, all as ~de~g.¢ted in the plans submitted herewith (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dW~lling,,~bor of dwelling units N/^ Number.of dwelling units on each floor If ~amge,,:~ of cars 6. If business, commerdal or rmxed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of usc. Restaurant and Marina 7.Dimensions or, existing structures, if shy: Front Rear Depth Height Number'of Stories Addition Alteration 'OtherWorkApplica_nt.proposes to erect a 70 Rear Dimensions of same structure wlth alterations or additions: Front Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories**7o' stealth mon~pole ~O~ sq. ff. AT&T equipment area Rear Depth 1: George F. Hasse (Eastern portion of property) Name of Former Owner .2. Fitz-Amold Realt~ Co. (Western porQon of property) / +/- 4.64 acres 9. Size oflot:'Front ]. December 8, 1999 10. Date of Purohase 2. March 29. 1979 · 11. Zone or use district in Which premises a~ situated M~n - Marine II 12. Docs proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinanCe or regulation? YE8 NO__ 13. Will lot ho re-graded? YES X NO Will exeess fill be removed fi'oro premises? YES X 40200 Main Road x~.,~oo e,¢ C~*n~.v of n~-11/~e8 M.G.H. Enterprises, Inc.Adi~teas Orient, NY 11957 Phone No. 14' ~,~' ".~,.~"~",.,~,i- "~.t- '~illiam F. Collins AIA Architects, Address 12-1Teclmology Dr,Phone No x-~muo ,.,~ r~,~. ' LL? Address SetauKet, N Y 11733 ' Phone No. Name of Contrac~ ' 15 a. IS this proImrty within 10o feax of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YE8 x NO * tF YES, $OUTHOLD TOWN TRUgTBB8 & D.E.C, PERIvnT8 MAY BE RBQUIRED. b Is this propetWwithin3OOfeet°fatidslwetland?*YES X NO__ * IF YES, D,E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data NO x NO 631-689-8450 on survey. 18. Are there any covenants ~nd res,.trictions with respect to this property? * YES · IF YES, PROVIDE ~ COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF ) Joseph Sweet being drily sworn, deposeS and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing oontract) abov~ named, (S)He is the Lessee / Applicant (Contractor, Agen~ Corporam Officer, etc.) · make and file this application; of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the smd work and tn tha~ all stetdraents contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the aPPlication filed ~erewith. Nom~ Public Vicl~ 8rennan, losep~weet, Systm Development Manager TO: FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: September 29, 2009 MGH Enterprises, Inc. C/O Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Ave. Huntington, NY 11743 Please take notice that your application dated September 1, 2009 For permit to construct wireless telecommunications facility: Location of property: 40200 Route 25, Orient, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 1~5 Block 9 Lot 8.~1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is a permitted use on this 4.55 acre lot located in the MII zone. Pursuant to Section 280-70(E), the proposed use requires a special exception and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board TOWN ItALL ? ~ ? SOUTI-IOLDt NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765~1802 ' BLDG· DEPT. FAX: (631) 765-9502 TOWN 0[ SOUTHOLD www. northfork, neffSouthold/ PERMIT NO. Examined ,20__ Approved 20__ Disapproved dC' Expiration ,20.__ - 1 2009 ]UILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECICLIST Do y~ou have or need the following, before npplying? Board of Health 4 sets of Building plans Planning Board approval Survey Check Septic Form N.Y:S.D.E.C. Trustees Contact: Attorneys for'Applicant Mail to: Munl e~v, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 .N. New York Ave., H~lntington Phone: 631-425-4100 NY 11743 Building Inspector APPLICATI a. This application MUST be completely filler sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee accordin~ b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of b~il ' areas, and waterways; c. The work covered by this application may n ON FOR BUILDING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS Date ,20 in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 to schedule. flings on premises, relationship to adjoining p~emises or public streets or )t be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Buil4ing Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection tl~reughout the work. ' e. No building shall be occupied or used in wltole or tn part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. | f. Every building permit shall expire if the wo~tk authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Buildin*Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereatler, a new permit shall be.~equired. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the B~lding Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Boilding Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, S~iffolk County, New York, anit other applicable Laws, Ordinances or ' Regu ations, for the construction of buildings, additiods, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described The apphcant agrees to comply w~th all apphcable laws, el dmances, bmldmg code, housmg code, and regulattons, and to admrt authorized inspectors on premises and in building for iecossary inspections. · (1} New Cingular Wireless. PCS, LLC (2) MetroPCS New York, LLC (Signature of applicant or nmne, ifa corporation) (1) 333 Crossways Park Dr., Woodbury, NY 1179' (2) 5 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne,' NY 1052Z (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is Owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contracto~, electrician, plumber or builder Applicants are Lessees Nameofowner of premises MGB Enterprise! Inc. \ · i (As on the tax roll or late~"deed} If aptllica~t.is a qor~ogAt~u£e of.d~uly aut!~orized officer t~t Be~ bl~gUla~l~ess HUb, LLU I ~m~t~le ~orporate officer) doseph ~ee~ System Development M~ nager Builders Licens~ Plmnbers License No. Electricians License No. O~her Trade's License N0. LLC D n'Oltfleffi NY VPJ'GM 1; Location of land on which proposed work will.be done: 40200 Ma~n Road {a/k/a S.R. 25) House Nmnber Street Orient Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section Subdivision ' ¢4ame) 15 2. State existing use and o cc~pancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing .use and occupancy Restaurant, s%ora~e building and dock (marina) ' b. Intended use and occupancy Publ i c Uti 1 i ty Wi rel ess Tel ecommuni cati ohs E~ci 1 i ty 3. Nature of work (check which appligable): New Building Addition Alteration Keuair Removal .Demolition Other W.0rk [rqct pob]'~c uti 1 i ty *ti vel ess tel bcommunicaLiun~.:' steal e, lnsl;al l ~nLer. related .eckulpmeq,t~oAa ~q,r~o~s depicted jn plans submtted heremth. P 4. Estimated (;cst ,cuu,uuu.uu ~ee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling number of dwelling units N/A Number ofdweiling units on each floor N/A If garafle, number of cars N/A 6. If buSiness, commercial or mixed occupancy/sPecify nature and extent of each type of use. N/A 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Height- Number of Stories .Depth Rear Swo~n to before me thi~,, I~ day;/"]~ 20 ~0~) Notary Publ~ ~-~toria :!)rsnnan Notify Pklb!ic~.,~te of New York No, O~6072822 Qualified iii Nassau County Commissiofl expires April 15, 2010 New Ci~ ~, LLC ~ h3~gnature of Applicant h Sweet,' System Development Manager Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Depth Height, Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction:*Front Rear .Depth . Heig,ht Number of Stories *p~2oposed 80' stealth monopole a~.d 29't07~12'8" eqU~praent,,cqmpounO rjr ~;1ngular and 16'xlZ' equipment compound for MetroPCS 9. Size of lot(Front Rear Depth December 8, 1999~ *George F. Hasse (gas~ern~p~ntion'of:p~op~rt2 10. Date of Purchase March 29, 1979**Name of Former Owner**Fitz'A~nold Realty CO; (Western portion of . proper~y) 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated MI I -Mari ne I I 12: Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES__NO X 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES x NO Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES x NO MGH Enterprises, .P.O. Box 333 14. Names of Owner of premises inc. ' Address urlent, NY 11957 Phone No. Name of Architect W~ ~ xam F. Co~lL1p~n*, AIA Address 10-1 Technology D .rt~.hone No 631-689-8450 Name of Contractor Architects ' h Address Setautcet., NY 1 t / 21ghone No. 15 a. Is th~s property within 100 feet cfa tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES_ :x NO * IF YES, sOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEE8 & D.E:C. PERIVlITSMAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YE8 . NO * IF YES, D.E.C. pERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on Suntey. 18. Are there any qovenants and restrictions with respect to this property? *YES__ NO X ~TE OF'NEW YORK) ~** SEE ADDENDUM "A" ~0R C0-APPLICANT'S NOTARIZED. STATEMENT SS: cOUNTY OF. NASSAU ) Joseph Sweet be ng duly sworn, deposes and says.that (s)he is the aPplicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named, (S)He is the System Development Mana~er of New Cin~ular Wirel ess PCS ~ LLC, co-gppl icant and Lessee (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) ....... i_}l~-~ _a.~ a.~. o-*~,-~zed to ~efform or have nefformed the said Work and to make and file this application; ;~:ta~l :~a~e:-~{~[~.~.in~ t~?~Ya;;~[~[IOI1 arc'rue to the be.st o~ lus knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in th~/~na~ih~r s%ieforth in the application filed therewith. STATE OF NEW yORK, COUNTY OF ~SAU )Sa.: On this 29th day of March, 1979, before m~ personally came ~ ARNOLD, to R~LTY CO., and ~t,he ~ iu~=~ to 1000 039.0'0 01,00 2.1 T$11SINl>l".N'rUl~g,m,d~lhc cC) d~yof Ducombor I,~(~ ,I. thcyeer ninety-nine , IIKTWEEN Drlva, Mnnha~let, New York 11030 M.G,II. ~NTBRPRISES, INC,, hay/hq an offioo p~rly of Ibc eecund peri, WITNEg~ g'rll, tllal ll~e pony of Iht first pet~, in consideration ol'l'cn Dollarc end oilier vehlcble concide 'mien ^ I.I. lhnl con. in plot piece ar parcel et land, will1 :ho bulldinllc and Imprnvcn~lttl thcreoa creeled, sinmle, lying SEE SCll~:DUL~; "A" IIERBTO ATTACII~'D fir~t in, ri will rccdvc tho conxtderullon for thia conveyance and will hold tho r[ght 1o receive ILlth ~tmiflernllon IN WITNI~NN WII~:II ECl },'. ~))e pnrly ofSi~e flrJl paU }ms duly lxcCUlld Ibis deed the flay and year G~OR~-'~ P, IIAA~4g "' New York 11003 SCHEDULE AM:ENDED 10/6/98 All that cetuin plot, piece or parcel of land with the bulldlnis and Unprovemen~ thcre~n erected, situate, lying and being In ~ Town of Southoid, County of Suffolk and Sate of New York being more particularly bounded and described u follows: BEGINNING at a point on the ~ouu~tly Ilde of Main Road, sa{d point being where the northe~mHy comer of the pmm{~s to ~ de~ri~ ~{ he no~w~torly co~r of la~ N/F of MGH Eme~mes. I~,, ~ descried in Lt~r 18~7 ~ page 6? [nte~t aid sou~etly side of ~ain Roa~; RUNNqNG THENCE South 4 degrees 40 minutes 45 s~¢onds East, along the land N/F of MOH EmarprL~. Inc.. 800.00 feet; TIiENCE, South 8'/degrees 09 mmutee 2.0 ~conda West. 30.00 feet, to la~xt of Orient Beach Sta~e Park; THENCE Nor~. 4 degrees 40 minutes 45 ~'~ond~ West, along the land of Orient Ikach State Park. 800.00 feat. to the southerly side of Main Road: THENCE North 81 deS~ee 09 minutea 20 ~onda Eu{, along the southerly ~ide of Main Road, 30.00 feet. to the point or place of BEGINNINO. Market tE as~t Cell Site Number: NYCENY1059 Cell Site Name: East Orient Point OPTION AND LEASE AGREEMENT THIS OPTION AND LEASE AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), dated as of the latter of the signature dates below (the "Effective Date"), is entered into by M.G.H Enterprises, Inc. a domestic Corporation, having a mailing address of P.O. Box 333, Main Road, Orient Point, NY 11957 (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord") and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, having a mailing address of 6100 Atlantic Boulevard, Norcross, Georgia 3007I(hereinafter referred to as "Tenant"). BACKGROUND Landlord owns or controls that certain plot, parcel or tract of land, together with all rights and privileges arising in connection therewith, located at P.O. Box 333, 40200 Main Road, Orient Point, NY 11957, in the County of Suflblk, State of New York (collectively, the "Property"). Tenant desires to use a portion of the Property in connection with its federally licensed communications business. Landlord desires to grant to Tenant the right to use a portion of the Property in accordance with this Agreement. The parties agree as follows: 1. OPTION TO LEASE. (a) Landlord grants to Tenant an option (the "Option") to lease a certain portion of the Property containing approximately 400 square feet including the air space above such room/cabinet/ground space as described on attached Exhibit 1, together with unrestricted access for Tenant's uses from the nearest public right- of-way along the Property to the Premises as described on the attached Exhibit 1 (colIectively, the "Premises"). (b) During the Option period and any extension thereof, and during the term of this Agreement, Tenant and its agents, engineers, surveyors and other representatives will have the right to enter upon the Property to inspect, examine, conduct soil borings, drainage testing, material sampling, radio frequency testing and other geological or engineering tests or studies of the Property (collectively, the "Tests"), to apply for and obtain licenses, permits, approvals, or other relief required of or deemed necessary or appropriate at Tenant's sole discretion for its use of the Premises and include, without limitation, applications for zoning variances, zoning ordinances, amendments, special use permits, and construction permits (collectively, the "Government Approvals"), initiate the ordering and/or scheduling of necessary utilities, and otherwise to do those things on or offthe Property that, in the opinion of Tenant, are necessary in Tenant's sole discretion to determine the physical condition of the Property, the environmental history of the Property, Landlord's title to the Property and the feasibility or suitability of the Property for Tenant's Permitted Use, all at Tenant's expense. Tenant will not be liable to Landlord or any third party on account of any pre-existing defect or condition on or with respect to the Property, whether or not such defect or condition is disclosed by Tenant's inspection. Tenant will restore the Property to its condition as it existed at the commencement of the Option Term (as defined below), reasonable wear and tear and casualty not caused by Tenant excepted. In addition, Tenant shall indemnify, defend and hold Landlord harmless from and against any and all injury, loss, damage or claims arising directly out of Tenant's Tests. (c) In. co_nsid~eration of Landlo_rd granting Tenant the Option, Tenant agrees to pay Landlord the sum of ....... .Il ~ within thirty (30) business days of the Effective Date. The Option will be for an initial term of one (1) year commencing on the Effective Date (the "Initial Option Term") and may be renewed by T_epant,~for an additional six (6) months upon written notification to Landlord and the payment of ..... II1- - -- I II-- -') no later than ten (10) days prior to the expiration date of the Initial Option Tenn. (d) The Option may be sold, assigned or transferred at any time by Tenant to Tenant's parent company or member if Tenant is a limited liability company or any affiliate or subsidiary of, or partner in, Tenant Option Land Le~e ,t or its parent company or member. Otherwise, the Option may not be sold, assigned or transferred without the written consent of Landlord, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. From and after the date the Option has been sold, assigned or transferred by Tenant to a third party agreeing to be subject to the terms hereof, Tenant shall immediately be released from any and ail liability under this Agreement, including the payment of any rental or other sums due, without any further action. (e) During the Initial Option Term and any extension thereof, Tenant may exercise the Option by notifying Landlord in writing. If Tenant exercises the Option then Landlord leases the Premises to the Tenant subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If Tenant does not exercise the Option during the Initial Option Term or any extension thereof, this Agreement wilI terminate and the parties will have no further liability to each other. (f') If during the Initial Option Term or any extension thereof, or during the term of this Agreement if the Option is exercised, Landlord decides to subdivide, sell, or change the status of the zoning of the Premises, Property or any of Landlord's contiguous, adjoining or surrounding property (the "Surrounding Property," which includes (without limitation) the remainder of the structure) or in the event of foreclosure, Landlord shall immediately notify Tenant in writing. Any sale of the Property shall be subject to Tenant's rights under this Agreement. Landlord agrees that during the Initial Option Term or any extension thereof, or during the Term of this Agreement if the Option is exercised, Landlord shall not initiate or consent to any change in the zoning of the Premises, Property or Surrounding Property or impose or consent to any other restriction that would prevent or limit Tenant from using the Premises for the uses intended by Tenant as hereinafter set forth in this Agreement. 2. PERMITTED USE. (a) Tenant may use the Premises for the transmission and reception of communications signals and the installation, construction, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement and upgrade of its communications fixtures and related equipment, cables, accessories and improvements, which may include a suitable support structure, associated antennas, I beams, equipment shelters or cabinets and fencing and any other items necessary to the successful and secure use of the Premises (collectively, the "Communication Facility"), as well as the right to test, sup/ey and review title on the Property; Tenant further has the right but not the obligation to add, modify and/or replace equipment in order to be in compliance with any current or future federal, state or local mandated application, including, but not limited to, emergency 911 communication services, at no additional cost to Tenant or Landlord (collectively, the "Permitted Use"). Landlord and Tenant agree that any portion of the Communication Facility that may be conceptually described on Exhibit 1 will not be deemed to limit Tenant's Permitted Use. If Exhibit 1 includes drawings of the initial installation of the Communication Facility, Landlord's execution of this Agreement will signify Landlord's approval of Exhibit 1. Tenant has the right to install and operate transmission cables from the equipment shelter or cabinet to the antennas, electric lines from the main feed to the equipment shelter or cabinet and communication lines from the main entry point to the equipment shelter or cabinet, and to make Property improvements, alterations, upgrades or additions appropriate for Tenant's use ("Tenant Changes"). Tenant Changes include the right to construct a fence around the Premises and undertake any other appropriate means to secure the Premises. Said fence shall not have any barbed wire. Tenant agrees to comply with all applicable govemmentaI laws, roles, statutes and regulations, relating to its use of the Communication Facility on the Property. Tenant has the right to modify, supplement, replace, upgrade, expand the equipment, increase the number of antennas or relocate the Communication Facility within the Premises at any time during the term of this Agreement. Tenant will be allowed to make such alterations to the Property in order to accomplish Tenant's Changes or to insure that Tenant's Communication Facility complies with all applicable federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. In the event Tenant desires to modify or upgrade the Communication Facility, and Tenant requires an additional portion of the Property (the "Additional Premises") for such modification or upgrade Landlord agrees, with Landlord's prior approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, to lease to Tenant the Additional Premises, upon the same terms and conditions set forth herein, except that the Rent shall be renegotiated, in conjunction with the lease of the Additional Premises by a reasonable amount consistent with rental rates then charged for comparable portions of real properly being in the same area. Landlord agrees to take such actions and enter into and deliver to Tenant such documents as Tenant reasonably requests in order to effect and memorialize the lease of the Additional Premises to Tenant. (b) Prior to the initial installation of Tenant's Changes, Tenant will supply the Landlord with plans and specifications ("Plans") to be reviewed and approved by the Landlord prior to commencement of Tenant's Changes. Landlord's approval will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed (and in no event delayed beyond ten (10) days). After Landlord's (i) failure to respond in writing to Tenant's proposed Plans within ten (10) days of their receipt; or (ii) failure to provide a written response within five (5) days of receipt of Plans revised by Tenant after comment from Landlord in accordance with this paragraph, the Plans will be deemed approved. After approval or deemed approval, the Plans will be considered incorporated in this Agreement as Exhibit 1. If the Landlord disapproves the Plans then the Tenant will provide the Landlord with revised Plans, such revisions to be within Tenant's reasonable discretion. In the event Landlord disapproves of the Plans upon a second (2nd) submission, Tenant may terminate this Agreement. Landlord will not knowingly permit or suffer any person to copy or utilize the Plans for any purpose other than as provided in this Agreement and will return the Plans to Tenant promptly upon request. (c) Landlord shall be solely responsible for purchasing and installing a flag on the support structure ("Tower") and Landlord shall be solely responsible for the lighting of the Tower. Tenant shall install the appropriate rigging on the Tower so that the Tower can hold a flag. Furthermore, Tenant shall run the electricity to the Tower so that Landlord can provide lighting. Landlord shall be responsible for maintenance and replacement of the flag and adhere to all relevant flag protocols (i.e., US flag must be lit or taken down at night). Landlord shall be responsible for any landscaping installation, maintenance, replacement and the like around the base of the Tower, if any. 3. TERM. (a) The initial lease term will be five (5) years ("Initial Term"), commencing on the effective date of written notification by Tenant to Landlord of Tenant's exercise of the Option (the "Term Commencement Date"). The Initial Term will terminate on the fifth (5th) annual anniversary of the Term Commencement Date. (b) This Agreemant will automatically renew for four (4) additional five (5) year term(s) (each five (5) year term shall be defined as the "Extansion Term"), upon the same terms and conditions unless the Tenant notifies the Landlord in writing of Tenant's intention not to renew this Agreement at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the existing Term. (c) If, at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the fourth (4th) extended term, either Landlord or Tenant has not given the other written notice of its desire that the term of this Agreement end at the expiration of the fourth (4th) extended term, then upon the expiration of the fourth (4th) extended term this Agreement shall continue in force upon the same covenants, terms and conditions for a further term of one (1) year, and for annual terms thereafter until terminated by either party by giving to the other written notice of its intention to so terminate at least six (6) months prior to the end of any such annual term. Monthly rental during such annual terns shall be equal to the rent paid for the last month of the fourth (4th) extended term. If Tenant remains in possession of the Premises after the termination of this Agreement then Tenant will be deemed to be occupying the Premises on a month to month basis (the "Holdover Term"), subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Rent for the Holdover Term shall be One Hundred Fifty percent (I 50%) of the then current Rent amount. (d) The Initial Term, the Extension Term and the Holdover Term are collectively referred to as the Term ("Term"). RENT. (a) Commencing on the first day of the month following the date that Tenant commences construction Commencement Date"), Tenant will pay the Landlord a monthly rental payment of~ll~ ("Rent"), at the address set forth above, on or before the fifth (5th) day of each calendar 2005 Option Lint] Linc month in advance. In partial months occurring after the Rent Commencement Date, Rent will be prorated. The initial Rent payment will be forwarded by Tenant to Landlord within thirty (30) days after the Rent Commence~nent Date. (b) In year two (2) of the Initial Term, and each year thereafter, including throughout any Extension Terms exercised, the yearly rent will increase by.fillip[over the Rent paid during the previous year. (c) All Rent or other charges payable under this Agreement shall be billed by Landlord within one (1) year from the end of the calendar year in which the charges were incurred; any charges beyond such period shall not be billed by Landlord, and shall not be payable by Tenant. The provisions of the foregoing sentence shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 5. APPROVALS. (a) Landlord agrees that Tenant's ability to use the Premises is contingent upon the suitability of the Premises for Tenant's Permitted Use and Tenant's ability to obtain and maintain all Government Approvals. Landlord authorizes Tenant to prepare, execute and file all required applications to obtain Government Approvals for Tenant's Permitted Use under this Agreement and agrees to reasonably assist Tenant with such applications and with obtaining and maintaining the Government Approvals. (b) Tenant has the right to obtain a title report or commitment for a leasehold title policy from a title insurance company of its choice and to have the Property surveyed by a surveyor of Tenant's choice. In the event Tenant determines, in its sole discretion, due to the title report results or survey results, that the condition of the Premises is unsatisfactory, Tenant will have the right to terminate this Agreement upon notice to Landlord. (c) Tenant may also perform and obtain, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, soil borings, percolation tests, engineering procedures, environmental investigation or other tests or reports on, over, and under the Property, necessary to determine if the Tenant's use of the Premises will be compatible with Tenant's engineering specifications, system, design, operations or Government Approvals. 6. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated, without penalty or further liability, as follows: (a) by either party on thirty (30) days prior written notice, if the other party remains in default under Paragraph 15 Default and Right to Cure of this Agreement after the applicable cure periods; (b) by Tenant upon written notice to Landlord, if Tenant is unable to obtain, or maintain, any required approval(s) or the issuance of a license or permit by any agency, board, court or other governmental authority necessary for the construction or operation of the Communication Facility as now or hereafter intended by Tenant; or if Tenant determines in its sole discretion that the cost of obtaining or retaining the same is commercially unreasonable; (c) by Tenant upon written notice to Landlord for any reason, at any time prior to commencement of construction by Tenant; or (d) by Tenant upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to Landlord for any reason, so long as Tenant pays Landlord a termination fee equal to three (3) months Rent, at the then current rate, provided, however, that no such termination fee will be payable on account of the termination of this Agreement by Tenant under any one or more of Paragraphs 5(b) Approvals, 6(a) Termination, 6(b) Termination, 6(c) Termination, 8 Interference, 11 (d) Environmental, 18 Severability, 19 Condemnation or 20 Casualty of this Agreement. 7. INSURANCE. (a) Tenant will carry during the Term, at its own cost and expense, the following insurance: (i) "All Risk" property insurance for its property's replacement cost; (ii) conm~ercial general liability insurance with a minimum limit of liability ol~l~combined single limit for bodily injury or death/property damage arising out of any one occurrence; and (iii) Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by law. The coverage afforded by Tenant's commercial general liability insurance shall apply to Landlord as an additional insured, but only with respect to Landlord's liability arising out of its interest in the Property. (b) Tenant shall have the right to self-insure with respect to any of the above insurance requirements. 8. INTERFERENCE. (a) Where there are existing radio frequency user(s) on the Property, the Landlord will provide Tenant with a list of all existing radio frequency user(s) on the Property to allow Tenant to evaluate the potential for interference. Tenant warrants that its use of the Premises will not interfere with existing radio frequency user(s) on the Property so disclosed by Landlord, as long as the existing radio frequency user(s) operate and continue to operate within their respective frequencies and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. (b) Landlord will not grant, after the date of this Agreement, a lease, license or any other right to any third party for the use of the Property, if such use may in any way adversely affect or interfere with the Communication Facility, the operations of Tenant or the rights of Tenant under this Agreement. Landlord will notify Tenant in writing prior to granting any third party the right to install and operate communications equipment on the Property. (c) Landlord will not use, nor will Landlord permit its employees, tenants, licensees, invitees or agents to use, any portion of the Property in any way which interferes with the Communication Facility, the operations of Tenant or the rights of Tenant under this Agreement. Landlord will cause such interference to cease within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt of notice of interference from Tenant. In the event any such interference does not cease within the aforementioned cure period then the parties acknowledge that Tenant will suffer irreparable injury, and therefore, Tenant will have the right, in addition to any other rights that it may have at law or in equity, for Landlord's breach of this Agreement, to elect to enjoin such interference or to terminate this Agreement upon notice to Landlord. 9. I[NDEMNIFICATIOIN. (a) Tenant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Landlord harmless from and against any and all injury, loss, damage or liability (or any claims in respect of the foregoing), costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs but excluding real property or personal property taxes) arising directly from the installation, use, maintenance, repair or removal of the Communication Facility or Tenant's breach of any provision of this Agreement, except to the extent attributable to the negligent or intentional act or omission of Landlord, its employees, agents or independent contractors. (b) Landlord agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Tenant harmless from and against any and all injury, loss, damage or liability (or any claims in respect of the foregoing), costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs but excluding real property or personal property taxes) arising directly from the actions or failure to act of Landlord or its employees or agents, or Landlord's breach of any provision of this Agreement, except to the extent attributable to the negligent or intentional act or omission of Tenant, its employees, agents or independent contractors. (c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Tenant and Landlord each waives any claims that each may have against the other with respect to consequential, incidental or special damages. 10. WARRANTIES. (a) Tenant and Landlord each acknowledge and represent that it is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing and has the right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement and bind itself hereto through the party set forth as signatory for the party below. (b) Landlord represents and warrants that: (i) Landlord solely owns the Property as a legal lot in fee simple, or controls the Property by lease or license; (ii) the Property is not encumbered by any liens, restrictions, mortgages, covenants, conditions, easements, leases, or any other agreements of record or not of record, which would adversely affect Tenant's Permitted Use and enjoyment of the Premises under this Agreement; (iii) as long as Tenant is not in default then Landlord grants to Tenant sole, actual, quiet and peaceful use, enjoyment and possession of the Premises; (iv) Landlord's execution and performance of this Agreement will not violate any laws, ordinances, covenants or the provisions of any mortgage, lease or other agreement binding on the Landlord; and (v) if the Property is or becomes encumbered by a deed to secure a debt, mortgage or other security interest, 2005 Option Land Lease Landlord shall provide promptly to Tenant a mutually agreeable Subordination, Non-Disturbance and At~orument Agreement. 11. ENVIRONMENTAL. (a) Landlord represents and warrants, to the best of Landlord's knowledge, that the Property is free of hazardous substances as of the date of this Agreement, and, to the best of Landlord's knowledge, the Property has never been subject to any contamination or hazardous conditions resulting in any environmental investigation, inquiry or remediation. Landlord and Tenant agree that each will be responsible for compliance with any and all environmental and industrial hygiene laws, including any regulations, guidelines, standards, or policies of any governmental authorities regulating or imposing standards of liability or standards of conduct with regard to any environmental or industrial hygiene condition or other matters as may now or at any time hereafter be in effect, that are now or were related to that party's activity conducted in or on the Property. (b) Landlord and Tenant agree to hold harmless and indemnify the other from, and to assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities at the sole cost and expense of the indemnifying party for, payment of penalties, sanctions, forfeitures, losses, costs or damages, and for responding to any action, notice, claim, order, summons, citation, directive, litigation, investigation or proceeding which is related to (i) the indemnifying party's failure to comply with any environmental or industrial hygiene law, including without limitation any regulations, guidelines, standards or policies of any govemmentaI authorities regulating or imposing standards of liability or standards of conduct with regard to any environmental or industrial hygiene conditions or matters as may now or hereafter be in effect, or (ii) any environmental or industrial hygiene conditions that arise out of or are in any way related to the condition of the Property and activities conducted by the party thereon, unless the environmental conditions are caused by the other party. (c) The indemnifications of this Paragraph 11 Environmental specifically include reasonable costs, expenses and fees incurred in connection with any investigation of Property conditions or any clean-up, remediation, removal or restoration work required by any governmental authority. The provisions of this Paragraph 11 Environmental will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. (d) In the event Tenant becomes aware of any hazardous materials on the Property, or any environmental or industrial hygiene condition or matter relating to the Property that, in Tenant's sole determination, renders the condition of the Premises or Property unsuitable for Tenant's use, or if Tenant believes that the leasing or continued leasing of the Premises would expose Tenant to undue risks of government action, intervention or third-party liability, Tenant will have the right,, in addition to any other rights it may have at law or in equity, to terminate the Agreement upon notice to Landlord. 12. ACCESS. At all times throughout the Term of this Agreement, and at no additional charge to Tenant, Tenant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors, will have twenty-four (24) hour per day, seven (7) day per week pedestrian and vehicular access to and over the Property, from an open and improved public road to the Premises, for the installation, maintenance and operation of the Communication Facility and any utilities serving the Premises. Landlord grants to Tenant an easement for such access and Landlord agrees to provide to Tenant such codes, keys and other instruments necessary for such access at no additional cost to Tenant. Upon Tenant's request, Landlord will execute a separate recordable easement evidencing this right. In the event any public utility is unable to use the access or easement provided to Tenant then the Landlord agrees to grant additional access or an easement either to Tenant or to the public utility, for the benefit of Tenant, at no cost to Tenant. 13. REMOVAL/RESTORATION. All portions of the Communication Facility brought onto the Property by Tenant will be and remain Tenant's personal property and, at Tenant's option, may be removed by Tenant at any time during the Term. Landlord covenants and agrees that no part of the Communication Facility constructed, erected or placed on the Premises by Tenant will become, or be considered as being affixed to or a part of, the Property, it being the specific intention of the Landlord that all improvements of every kind and nature constructed, erected or placed by Tenant on the Premises will be and remain the property of the Tenant and may be removed by Tenant at any time during the Term. Within one hundred twenty (120) days of the 6 termination of this Agreement, Tenant will remove all of Tenant's above-ground improvements and Tenant will, to the extent reasonable, restore the Premises to its condition at the commencement of the Agreement, reasonable wear and tear and loss by casualty or other causes beyond Tenant's control excepted. Footings, foundations, and concrete will be removed to a depth of two feet below grade. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant wiI1 not be responsible for the replacement of any trees, shrubs or other vegetation, nor will Tenant be required to remove from the Premises or the Property any foundations or underground utilities. 14. MAINTENANCE/UTILITIES. (a) Tenant will keep and maintain the Premises in good condition, reasonable wear and tear and damage from the elements excepted. Landlord will maintain and repair the Property and access thereto, in good and tenantable condition, subject to reasonable wear and tear and damage from the elements. (b) Tenant will be responsible for paying on a monthly or quarterly basis all utilities charges for electricity, telephone service or any other utility used or consumed by Tenant on the Premises. In the event Tenant cannot secure its own metered electrical supply, Tenant will have the right, at its own cost and expense, to submeter from the Landlord. When submetering is necessary and available, Landlord will read the meter on a monthly or quarterly basis and provide Tenant with the necessary usage data in a timely manner to enable Tenant to compute such utility charges. Failure by Landlord to perform this function will limit utility fee recovery by Landlord to a I2-month period. Landlord will fully cooperate with any utility company requesting an easement over, under and across the Property in order for the utility company to provide service to the Tenant. Landlord will not be responsible for interference with, interruption of or failure, beyond the reasonable control of Landlord, of such services to be furnished or supplied by Landlord. 15. DEFAULT AND RIGHT TO CURE. (a) The following will be deemed a default by Tenant and a breach of this Agreement: (i) non- payment of Rent if such Rent remains unpaid for more than thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from Landlord of such failure to pay; or (ii) Tenant's failure to perform any other term or condition under this Agreement within forty-five (45) days after receipt of written notice from Landlord specifying the failure. No such failure, however, will be deemed to exist if Tenant has commenced to cure such default within such period and provided that such efforts are prosecuted to completion with reasonable diligence. Delay in curing a default will be excused if due to causes beyond the reasonable control of Tenant. If Tenant remains in default beyond any applicable cure period, Landlord will have the right to exercise any and all rights and remedies available to it under law and equity. (b) The following will be deemed a default by Landlord and a breach of this Agreement: Landlord's failure to perform any term, condition or breach of any warranty or covenant under this Agreement within forty- five (45) days after receipt of written notice from Tenant specifying the failure. No such failure, however, will be deemed to exist if Landlord has commenced to cure the default within such period and provided such efforts are prosecuted to completion with reasonable diligence. Delay in curing a default will be excused if due to causes beyond the reasonable control of Landlord. If Landlord remains in default beyond any applicable cure period, Tenant will have the right to exercise any and all rights available to it under law and equity, including the right to cure Landlord's default and to deduct the costs of such cure from any monies due to Landlord from Tenant. 16. ASSIGNMENT/SUBLEASE. (a) Tenant will have the right to assign, sell or transfer its interest under this Agreement without the approval or consent of Landlord, to Tenant's parent or member company or any affiliate or subsidiary of, or partner in, Tenant or its parent or member company or to any entity which acquires all or substantially all of the Tenant's assets in the market defined by the Federal Communications Commission in which the Property is located by reason of a merger, acquisition, or other business reorganization. Upon notification to Landlord of such assignment, transfer or sale, Tenant will be relieved of ali future performance, liabilities and obligations under this Agreement. Tenant may not other,vise assign this Agreement without Landlord's consent, Landlord's consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 7 (b) Tenant shall have the unfettered right to sublease any space on the Tower to other tenants. However, all such tenants shall also be required, as a condition precedent, to enter into a separate ground lease with Landlord for any cabinets and related ground equipment. 17. NOTICES. All notices, requests, demands and communications hereunder will be given by first class certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight courier, postage prepaid, to be effective when properly sent and received, refused or returned undelivered. Notices will be addressed to the parties as follows: If to Tenant: c/o Cingular Wireless LLC Attn: Network Real Estate Administration Re: Cell Site # NYCENY1059; Cell Site Name: East Orient Point 6100 Atlantic Boulevard Norcross, GA 30071 With a copy to: Cingular Wireless LLC Attn: Legal Department Re: Cell Site # NYCENY1059; Cell Site Name: East Orient Point 15 E Midland Avenue Paramus, NJ 07652 If to Landlord: M.G.H Enterprises, Inc. P.O. Box 333, Main Road Orient Point, NY 11957 Either party hereto may change the place for the giving of notice to it by thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other as provided herein. 18. SEVERABILITY. If any term or condition of this Agreement is found unenforceable, the remaining terms and conditions will remain binding upon the parties as though said unenforceable provision were not contained herein. However, if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision materially affects this Agreement then the Agreement may be terminated by either party on ten (10) business days prior written notice to the other party hereto. 19. CONDEMNATION. In the event Landlord receives notification of any condemnation proceedings affecting the Property, Landlord will provide notice of the proceeding to Tenant within forty-eight (48) hours. If a condemning authority takes all of the Property, or a portion sufficient, in Tenant's sole determination, to render the Premises unsuitable for Tenant, this Agreement will terminate as of the date the title vests in the condemning authority. The parties will each be entitled to pursue their own separate awards in the condemnation proceeds, which for Tenant will include, where applicable, the value of its Communication Facility, moving expenses, prepaid Rent, and business dislocation expenses, provided that any award to Tenant will not diminish Landlord's recovery. Tenant will be entitled to reimbursement for any prepaid Rent on a prorata basis. 20. CASUALTY. Landlord will provide notice to Tenant of any casualty affecting the Property within forty-eight (48) hours of the casualty. If any part of the Communication Facility or Property is damaged by fire or other casualty so as to render the Premises unsuitable, in Tenant's sole determination, then Tenant may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to the Landlord, which termination MI1 be effective as of the date of such damage or destruction. Upon such termination, Tenant will be entitled to collect all insurance proceeds payable to Tenant on account thereof and to be reimbursed for any prepaid Rent on a prorata basis. Jif notice of termination is given, or if Landlord or Tenant undertake to rebuild the Communications Facility, Landlord aggress to use its reasonable efforts to permit Tenant to place temporary transmission and reception facilities on the Property at no additional Rent until such time as Tenant is able to secure a replacement [ransmissi(m location or the reconstruction of the Communication Facility is completed. 21. WAIVER OF LANDLORD'S LIENS. Landlord waives any and all lien rights it may have, statutory or otherwise, concerning the Communication Facility or any portion thereof. The Communication Facility shall be deemed personal property for purposes of this Agreement, regardless of whether any portion is deemed real or personal property under applicable law, and Landlord consents to Tenant's right to remove all or any portion of the Communication Facility from time to time in Tenant's sole discretion and without Landlord's consent. 22. TAXES. Landlord shall be responsible for payment of all ad valorem taxes levied upon the lands, improvements and other property of Landlord. Tenant shall be responsible for all taxes levied upon Tenant's leasehold improvements (including Tenant's equipment building and tower) on the Leased Property. Landlord shall provide Tenant with copies of ali assessment notices on or including the Leased Property immediately upon receipt, but in no event Iess than fourteen (14) business days after receipt by Landlord. If Landlord fails to provide such notice within such time frame, Landlord shall be responsible for all increases in taxes for the year covered by the assessment. Tenant shall have the right to contest, in good faith, the validity or the mnount of any tax or assessment levied against the Leased Property by such appellate or other proceedings as may be appropriate in the jurisdiction, and may defer payment of such obligations, pay same under protest, or take such other steps as Tenant may deem appropriate. This right shall include the ability to institute any legal, regulatory or informal action in the name of Landlord, Tenant, or both, with respect to the valuation of the Leased Property. Landlord shall cooperate in the institution and prosecution of any such proceedings and will execute any documents required therefore. The expense of any such proceedings shall be borne by Tenant and any refunds or rebates secured as a result of Tenant's action shall belong to Tenant. 23. SALE OF PROPERTY. If Landlord, at any time during the Term of this Agreement, decides to sell, subdivide or rezone any of the Premises, all or any part of the Property or Surround/rig Property, to a purchaser other than Tenant, Landlord shall promptly notify Tenant in writing, and such sale, subdivision or rezoning shall be subject to this Agreement and Tenant's rights hereunder. Landlord agrees not to sell, lease or use any areas of the Property or Surrounding Property for the installation, operation or maintenance of other wireless communications facilities if such installation, operation or maintenance would interfere with Tenant's Permitted Use or communications equipment as determined by radio propagation tests performed by Tenant in its sole discretion, any such testing to be at the expense of Landlord or Landlord's prospective purchaser, and not Tenant. If the radio frequency propagation tests demonstrate levels of interference unacceptable to Tenant, Landlord shall be prohibited from selling, leasing or using any areas of the Property or the Surrounding Property for purposes of any installation, operation or maintenance of any other wireless communications facility or equipment. Landlord shall not be prohibited from the selling, leasing or use of any of the Property or the Surrounding Property for non- wireless communication use. In the event the Property is transferred, the new landlord shall have a duty at the time of such transfer to provide Tenant with a completed IRS Form W-9, or its equivalent, and other related paper work to effect a transfer in Rent to the new landlord. The provisions of this Paragraph 23 shall in no way limit or impair the obligations of Landlord under Paragraph 8 above. 24. MISCELLANEOUS. (a) Amendment/Waiver. This Agreement cannot be amended, modified or revised unless done in writing and signed by an authorized agent of the Landlord and an authorized agent of the Tenant. No provision may be waived except in a writing signed by both parties. (b) Memorandum/Short Form Lease. Either party will, at any time upon fifteen (15) business days prior written notice from the other, execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other a recordable 9 2005 Option Land Lea~e Memorandum or Short Form of Lease. Either party may record this Memorandum or Short Form of Lease at any time, in its absolute discretion. (c) Bind and Benefit. The terms and conditions contained in this Agreement will run with the Properly and bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. (d) Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto, all being a part hereof, constitute the entire agreement of the parties hereto and will supersede all prior offers, negotiations and agreements with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. (e) Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the state in which the Premises are located, without regard to conflicts of law. (f) Interpretation. Unless otherwise specified, the following rules of construction and interpretation apply: (i) captions are for convenience and reference only and in no way define or limit the construction of the terms and conditions hereof; (ii) use of the term "including" will be interpreted to mean "including but not limited to"; (iii) whenever a party's consent is required under this Agreement, except as otherwise stated in the Agreement or as same may be duplicative, such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; (iv) exhibits are an integral part of the Agreement and are incorporated by reference into this Agreement; (v) use of the terms "termination" or "expiration" are interchangeable; and (vi) reference to a default will take into consideration any applicable notice, grace and cure periods. (g) Estoppel. Either party will, at any time upon twenty (20) business days prior written notice from the other, execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other a statement in writing (i) certifying that this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect (or, if modified, stating the nature of such modification and certifying this Agreement, as so modified, is in full force and effect) and the date to which the Rent and other charges are paid in advance, if any, and (ii) acknowledging that there are not, to such party's knowledge, any uncured defaults on the part of the other party hereunder, or specifying such defaults if any are claimed. Any such statement may be conclusively relied upon by any prospective purchaser or encumbrancer of the Premises. The requested party's failure to deliver such a statement within such time will be conclusively relied upon by the requesting party that (i) this Agreement is in full force and effect, without modification except as may be properly represented by the requesting party, (ii) there are no uncured defaults in either party's performance, and (iii) no more than one month's Rent has been paid in advance. (h) No Electronic SignatureYNo Option. The submission of this Agreement to any party for examination or consideration does not constitute an offer, reservation of or option for the Premises based on the terms set forth herein. This Agreement will become effective as a binding Agreement only upon the handwritten legal execution, acknowledgment and delivery hereof by Landlord and Tenant. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON TIlE NEXT PAGE] I0 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be effective as of the last date written below'. WITNESSES: "LANDLORD" M.G.H Enterprises, Inc. a domestic Corporation Print Name: Print Name: Print Name: PrintName:C hr~'sq-~/l't'_ q'_,q_mrO~"~ "TENANT" Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware Limited s Hormann .tk~Director Imply/mention (NY/NJ) Date: .'~/~'/o j~ [ACKNOWLEDGMENTS APPEAR ON THE NEXT PAGE] 11 2005 Option Lead Lease TENANT ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF N~' ) ) SS: COUNTY OF 7~e~._~ ~!% ) On the q day of_~llXj_,~200~ before me personally, al~peared.~ffrfg- ~(oga, ~q , and acknowledged under oath that he is the '4d'.,,ka..-,,'J~ named in the attar ched instrument, and as ~uch was authorized to execut~ Nota~ublic: - My C~mission Expires: LANDLORD ACKNOWLEDGMENT INDIVDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) SS: COUNTY OF ) BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this"-~t~day of'~rL~'X , 2,00~Z~ before me, the subscriber, a .~erson authorized to take oaths in the State of ~,~La~L'(.~{(.._ , personally appeared ~'~':,~.Q/~ ~ ~_ who, being duly sworn on hi~/her/their oath', deposed and made proof to my 'satisfaction that he/she/they is/are the person(s) named in the within instrument; and I, having first made known to him/her/them the contents thereof, he/she/they did acknowledge that he/she/they signed, sealed and delivered the same as his/her/their voluntary act and deed for the purposes ?er~. Notary Public: .. .ma, ,1~ My Commission Expires: 12 CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF ) ) SS: COUNTY OF I CERTIFY that on ,200__, representative] personally came before me and acknowledged under oath that he or she: (a) is the [title] of corporation], the corporation named in the attached instrument, (b) was authorized to execute this instrument on behalf of the corporation and (c) executed the instrument as the act of the corporation. [name of [name of Notary Public: My Commission Expires: I3 EXHIBIT 1 DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES Page of to the Agreement dated ,200__, by and between M.G.H Enterprises, Inc. a domestic Corporation, as Landlord, and Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, as Tenant. The Premises are described and/or depicted as follows: } This Exhibit may be replaced by a land survey and/or construction drawings of the Premises once received by Tenant 2 Any setback of thc Premises from the Property's boundaries shall be the distance required by the applicable governmental authorities. 3. Width of access road shall be the width required by the applicable governmental authorities, including police and fire departments 4 The ~'pe, number and mounting positions and locations of antennas and traasmission lines are illustrative only. Actual types, numbers and mounting positions may vary from what is shown above EXlS'rlNG UTILITY POLE #35 WI[H OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES PROPERTY PROPOSFD TELCO CONDUIT IRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM,//~, EXlSTI~N~ UTILI'rY POLE #55 TO PROPOSED CBC CABINET AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY ~EXISTINC PROPERTY OWNED BY ORIENT POINT STATE PARK~ EXISIINC TRANSFORMER, METER AND DISCONNECT EXIS[ING STORAGE BUILDING PROPOSED ELECTRIC CONDUIT TRENCH~ UNDERGROUND FROM EXISTING [RANBFORMER TO PROPOSED CINGULAR ELECTRIC PANEL LOCATED ADJACENT CINGULAR EQUIPMENT CABINETS EXISIING BOAT LAUNCH RAMP~ ROUTE 25 EXISTING RETAINING WALL x ~. PROPOSED CINGULAR EQUIPMENT~ '~ ~ MOUNT~ ON PROPOSED ELEVATED '~, I~. EXISTING TRAILER AND BOATS ~ ~ TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS ~ ~. ~ SITE PLAN ~ ~'~ ~ '~ ~ WATER WELL BOAT Docks., ~EXISTING RESTAURANT AND MARINE FUELING STATION ~ PROPERTY LINE EXISTING~, [~OAT P ~ DOCKS ~ ~  _..~ ~ ~ EXISTING HARBOR ENTRANCE /~.~/ BLE ~. ~ /j,/'~\ FLAGPOLE WITH PROPOSED x~,~- ~ ~ ~,,~ \ CINGULAR ANTENNAS lk,;s dr~;[~fl and the design it covers are the property oF B[CH~EL The, ~re merely loaned and on the borrower's express agreement thai they will not be reproduced, Copied, Iocned, exhibited, or used except ia the [inlted way and privcte use permitted by any ~ri~ten consent given by the lender to [he borrower PROPERTY EXISTING SHRUBBERY TO BE REMOVED WHERE NECESSARY, 25'-6" [ELCO CONDUIT TRENCHE[ UNDERGROUND FROM EXISTING TELCO DEMARC ON ,NORTHWEST CONER OF PROPERTY EXISTING TRAILER AND BOATB TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS PROPOSED CINGULAR GPS ANTENNA, POLE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLE DASHED LINE REPRESENTS PROPOSED CINGULAR 400 SF LEASE AREA PROPOSED CINBULAR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ELEVATED GALVANIZED STEEL PLATFORM PROPOSED 200 AMP EMERGENCY GENERATOr RECEPTACLE PROPOSED CINGULAR TELCO AND ELECTRICAL PANEL NEW CBC CABINET PROPOSED $1AINLESS STEEL SHEET METAL ANFENNA CABLE SHROUD ENCLOSURE (4) PROPOSED C NGULAR COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT FLAGPOLE, ]YP, (2 PER SECTOR) PROPOSED CINGULAR IO0' O' HIGH RF ~ COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENTFLACPOLE~ ~N~RGE EQUIPMENT PLAN ;D CINGULAR 5~' HICH CHAINLIN/[~-~ FENCE WITH 4'--0" (~¥"? I OCKABLE GATE ~-/ BED TELCO CONDUI] TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM PROPOSED TELCO PANEL TO PROPOSED CBC CABINET OSED CINCULAR ELECTRIC AND GROUND CONDUITS~ TRENCHED ~L~ UNDEROROUNB TO~ PROPOSED CINGULAR METER FROM EXISTING TRANSFORMER LOCATION AT NORTH WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY ,_ ~--PROPOSED C/NCULAR COAXIAL ANTENNA TRENCHED UNDERCROUND FROM CABLE PROPOSED CINCULAR EQUIPMENT PLATFOR~ TO PROPOSED CINCU~R FLACPOLE PROPOSED BOLLARDS, TYP. PROPOSED F~GPOLE LIGHTING TO ~,q~VlBEB MAINTAIN E/~_. Ihls drawing ~nd the design it covers ore the property oF BECHTEL.~hey ore merely loaned and on the borrower's express agreement that they ~il not be reproduced, copiPd, loaned, exhibited, or used except in the limited ~oy and private use pernitted by ony ~ritten consent given by the lender to the borrower ISSUED FOR REV ~l~O~.O' 0"-+ AGL u PR(~PO~D FLAGPOLE ~i~ ~~) CINGULAR ' ANTENNAS PROPOSED CINCULAR ANFENNAS PROPOSED CINGULAR ANrENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE OF RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT FLAGPOLE, TYP (2 PER SECTOR) PROPOSED CINGULAR 100' 0' HIGH RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT FLAGPOLE PROPOSED CINGULAR CPS ANTENNA, POLE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLE SUPPORT RACK ~ITTI' 2"± AGL 0 PROPd~ED EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED BOLLARDS, TYP OF (6) PROPERTY I INE~ (~0' ~0"± AGL EAST ELEVATION -- PROPOSED FLAG TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS PROPOSED FLAG RIGGING TRANSFORMER LOCATION ON N.W. SIDE OF PROPERTY PROPOSED DSC CABINET PROPOSED FLAGPOLE FOUNDATION BY OTHERS -- PROPOSED CINDULAR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON ELEVATED GALVANIZED STEEL PLATFORM -- PROPOSED CINGULAR HIGH CHAINLINK FENCE WIT~,.~ 4' O" LOCKABLE GATE AND ELEC PANELS PROPOSED TELCO CONDUIT TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM PROPOSED TELCO PANEL TO PROPOSED DSC CABINET PROPOSED CINGULAR ELECTRIC AND GROUND CONDUITS TRENCHED UNDERGROUND TO PROPOSED CINGULAR ? -/Ivi METER FROM EXISTING 1t [h;s drawing and the design it covers are the property OF $[0t][I They ore F~erely loaned and on the borrower's express agreement that they wi ti not be reprodu{ed, copied, Wlaned, exhibited, or used except in the Imited way ~nd private use permitted by any written consent given by the lender to the borrm~er PROPOSED FLAG TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED O HERD PROPOSED CINGULAR 100'-0' RF COMPAIlBLE CONCEALMENT HIGH FLAGPOLE % PROPOSED CINGULAR STAINLESS STEEL SltEET METAL CABLE SHROUD ENCLOSURE--~ PROPOSED BOLLARDS, ~, rYE. OF (6)- ~ PROPERTY LINE- ~ ~ O' 0"± AGL GRADE /~ORTH ELEVATION 100'-0"± AGL T.O. PROPOSED FLAGPOLE g7'- 0"± AGL PROPOSED ONGULAR ~/ ANTENNAS 87' O"t AGL~ q r~ ~ PROPOSED ClN-GULAR~ Ill "--PROPOSED CINGULAR ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE OF RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT FLAGPOLE, rYe. (2 PER SECTOR) PROPOSED CINGULAR CPS ANTENNA, POLE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLE SUPPORT PROPOSED CINGULAR COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM PROPOSED CINGULAR EQUIPMENT AREA TO PROPOSED CINGULAR FLAGPOt ISSUED FOR REVIEW E CINGULAR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ELEVATED GALVANIZED STEEL PLATFORM CINDULAR ~ b-'""~" HIGH CHAINLINK"" FENCE WITH 4' 0" LOCKABLE GATE D C~NGULAR TELCO AND ELECTRIC PANEL ED CSC CABINET TELCO CONDUIT TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM PROPOSED CINGULAR CSC CABINET TO EXISTING TELCO DEMARC LOCATED ON EXISTING UTILITY POLE #35 AT NORTH SIDE OF PROPERTY TO. PROPOSED EQUIPMET CABINET PROPOSED CINGULAR ELECTRIC AND GROUND CONDUITS TRENCHED UNDERGROUND TO ~PROPOSED CINGULAR ¢/~ I~METER FROM EXISTLNG PROPOSED FLAGPOLE klGHTING TO ~3E x~.[. ~/TRANSFORMER AT NW PROVIDED AND INSTAl. LED BY OTHERS VSIDE OF PROPERTY This dra'~ing ond Lhe design it covers are Lhe property oF BECIITEL fhey are merely Loaned and on the borrower's express agreement that they ~i not be reproduced, copied, loaned, exhibited, or used except ;ri the Limited way and privote use permitted by any w¢itten consent given by the Lender to the borro.er COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ("Lease Agreement") dated as of , is made by and between MetroPCS New York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Lessee") and MGH Enterprises, Inc., a New York corporation ("Lessor"). RECITALS This Lease Agreement is entered into based upon the following facts, circumstances and understandings: A. Lessor owns certain real property legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and commonly known as 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957; Assessor's Parcel Number Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8 ("Lessor's Real Property"). Lessee desires to lease a portion of Lessor's Real Property with any necessary easements over other portions of Lessor's Real Property and/or shared use of Lessor's easements over other real property necessary for Lessee's access and utilities to the leased area (altogether the "Premises"), as described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Lessor represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the rights set forth herein and that it has full rights of ingress to and egress from the Premises from a public roadway. B. Lessee desires to construct and operate a wireless communications site at the Premises. C. Based on the Premises set forth herein and on the terms and conditions set forth below, Lessor is willing to lease the Premises to Lessee for Lessee's proposed use subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement. WHEREFORE, in consideration of the Premises set forth above and the terms and conditions set forth herein, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereto agree as follows: 1. Grant of Lease. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee the Premises for Lessee's proposed use, subject to the following terms and conditions for the Tenn. 2. Permitted Uses. The Premises may be used by Lessee for the operation of a wireless communications site. Under this Lease Agreement, Lessee may install, place, use and operate on the Premises such antennas, radio transmitting and receiving equipment, conduits, wires, batteries, back-up generators, utility lines and facilities, supporting structures, storage facilities, telephone facilities, microwave equipment, and related equipment (collectively "Lessee's Facilities") as Lessee deems necessary for the operation of its wireless communications site at the Premises. Further, Lessee may perform construction, maintenance, repairs, additions to, and replacement of Lessee's Facilities as necessary and appropriate for its ongoing business and has the right to do all work necessary to prepare, Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page I ell4 modify and maintain the Premises to accommodate Lessee's Facilities and as required for Lessee's communications operations at the Premises. 3. Conditions Precedent: Prior Approvals. This Lease Agreement is conditioned upon Lessee obtaining all governmental licenses, permits and approvals enabling Lessee to construct and operate wireless communications facilities on the Premises without conditions which are not standard or typical for premises where wireless communications facilities are located. Lessor agrees to cooperate with Lessee's reasonable requests for Lessor's signatures as real property owner on permit applications, for allowing site inspections by governmental agencies required in connection with reviewing permit applications, and for assistance in obtaining such necessary approvals, provided that such cooperation and assistance shall be at no expense to Lessor. 4. Term. (a) The term of this Lease Agreement ("Term") shall be five (5) years commencing on the date Lessee begins construction of Lessee's Facilities on the Promises or eighteen (18) months from the date of full execution of this Lease Agreement, whichever occurs first ("Commencement Date"). Lessee shall promptly deliver written notice to Lessor of the Commencement Date. Lessee shall have the right to extend the Term of this Lease Agreement for four (4) additional terms (each a "Renewal Term") of five (5) years each. The terms and conditions for each Renewal Term shall be the same terms and conditions as in this Lease Agreement, except that the Rent shall be increased as set forth hereinbelow. This Lease Agreement shall automatically be extended for each successive five (5) year Renewal Term unless Lessee notifies Lessor in writing of Leasee's intention not to extend this Lease Agreement at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the first Term or any Renewal Term. (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event that the Option and Land Lease Agreement by and between Lessor and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") dated March 9, 2006, terminates. 5. Rent. Within forty-five (45) days of the Commencement Date, Lessee shall pay Lessor, as rent, the sum of -- -- _ II '- IIlll - ~k ("Rent") per month. Rent shall be payable on the first day of each month, in advance, to Lessor or Lessor's alternate payee specified in Section 22, Notices and Deliveries. If the Commencement Date of this Lease Agreement is other than the first day of a calendar month, Lessee may pay on the first day of the Term the prorated Rent for the remainder of the calendar month in which the Term commences, and thereafter Lessee shall pay a full month's Rent on the first day of each calendar month, except that payment shall be prorated for the final fractional month of this Lease Agreement, or if this Lease Agreement is terminated before the expiration of any month for which Rent should have been paid. On the first anniversary of the Commencement Date and on each anniversary thereafter, including throughout any Renewal Terms exercised, the yearly Rent will increase by~lllllllllllll over the Rent paid during the previous year 6. Due Diligence Contingency and Pre-Commencement Date Access to Premises. Lessee shall have the right (but not the obligation) at any time following the full execution of this Lease Agreement and prior to the Commencement Date, to enter the Premises for the purpose of making necessary inspections, taking measurements and conducting engineering surveys (and soil tests where applicable) and other reasonably necessary tests to determine the suitability of the Premises for Lessee's Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient. NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 2 of 14 Facilities C'Due Diligence"), and for the purpose of preparing the Premises for the installation or construction of Lessee's Facilities. During any Due Diligence activities or pre-construction work, Lessee shall have insurance which covers such activities as set forth in Sectionl6, Insurance. Lessee will notify Lessor of any proposed tests, measurements or pre-construction work and will coordinate the scheduling of such activities with Lessor. If in the course of its Duc Diligence Lessee determines that the Premises are unsuitable for Lessee's contemplated use, then Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease Agreement prior to the Commencement Date by delivery of written notice thereof to Lessor as set forth in Section 13, Termination. 7. Ongoing Access to Premises. Throughout the Term and any Renewal Term of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall have the right of access without escort to the Premises for its employees and agents twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days per week, at no additional charge to Lessee. In exercising its right of access to the Premises herein, Lessee agrees to cooperate with any reasonable security procedures utilized by Lessor at Lessor's Real Property and further agrees not to unduly disturb or interfere with the business or other activities of Lessor or of other tenants or occupants of Lessor's Real Property. Lessor shall maintain all existing access roadways or driveways extending from the nearest public roadway to the Premises in a manner sufficient to allow for Lessee's access to the Premises. Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing such roadways and driveways at Lessor's sole expense, except for any damage caused by Lcssee's use of such roadways or driveways. If Lessee causes any such damage, Lessee shall promptly repair the same at its sole expense. 8. Lessee's Worlq Maintgnanee and Repairs. All of Lessee's construction and installation work at thc Premises shall be performed at Lassee's sole cost and expense and in a good and workmanlike manner. Lessee shall submit copies of the site plan and specifications to the Lessor for prior approval, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Lessor shall give such approval or provide Lessee with its requests for changes within ten (l.O) business days of Lessor's receipt of Lessee's plans. If Lessor does not provide such approval or request for changes within such ten (lO) business day period, Lessor shall be deemed to have approved the plans. Lessor shall not be entitled to receive any additional eonsidaration in exchange for giving its approval of Lessee's plans. Lessee shall maintain Lessee's Facilities and the Premises in neat and safe condition in compliance with ail applicable codes and governmental regulations. Lessee shall not be required to make any repairs to the Premises except for damages to the Premises caused by Lessee, its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. Upon the expiration, cancellation or termination of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall surrender the Premises in good condition, less ordinary wear and tear. 9. Title to Lessee's Facilities. Title to Lessee's Facilities and any equipment placed on the Premises by Lessee shall be held by Lessee. All of Lessee's Facilities shall remain the property of Lessee and are not fixtures. Lessee has the right to remove all Lessee's Facilities at its sole expense on or before the expiration or termination of this Lease Agreement. Lessor acknowledges that Lessee may enter into financing arrangements including promissory notes and financial and security agreements for the financing of Lessee's Facilities (the "Collateral") with a third party financing entity and may in the future enter into additional financing arrangements with other financing entities. In connection therewith, Lessor (i) consents to the installation of the Collateral to the extent that the Collateral is part of the approved Lessee's Facilities; (ii) disclaims any interest in the Collateral, as fixtures or otherwise, whether arising at law or otherwise, including, but not limited to any statutory landlord's lien; and (iii) agrees that the Collateral shall be exempt from execution, foreclosure, sale, levy, attachment, or distress Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 3 of 14 for any Rent due or to become due and that such Collateral may be removed at any time without recourse to legal proceedings. 10. Utilities. Lessee shall have the right to install utilities, at Lessee's expanse, and to improve the present utilities on or near the Premises (including, but not limited to the installation of emergency back-up power). Subject to Lessor's approval of the location, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, Lessee shall have the right to place utilities on (or to bring utilities across) Lessor's Real Property in order to service the Premises and Lessee's Facilities. Upon Lessee's request, Lessor shall execute recordable easement(s) evidencing this right. Any easements will automatically terminate upon the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. Lessee shall fully and promptly pay for all utilities furnished to the Premises for the use, operation and maintenance of Lessee's Facilities. Lessee shall use best efforts to utilize the proposed AT&T electrical meters that will be installed on the Property. Upon Lessee's request, Lessor shall allow Lessee to install sub-metering equipment on existing Lessor utility service(s).~ Lessee agrees to install, at Lessee's cost, the required equipment, meters and connections and will reimburse Lessor for Lessee's use of utilities at a rate equal to Lessor's unit cost for the utilities. Lessee shall pay the cost of utility service provided to the Premises and attributable to Lessee's use ("Utility Charge"). Lessee shall pay the estimated cost of the Utility Charge monthly in advance. The parties estimate the Utility Charge at the commencement of construction to be Three Hundred ($300.00) per month. During the term of this Lease Agreement, at Lessor's request (which request shall not be more frequent than once every twelve months), Lessee shall calculate the actual Utility Charge for the immediately preceding twelve (12) months based on the readings from the privately installed sub-meter at Lessor's property. If the actual Utility Charge varies from the estimated Utility Charges paid, the parties shall reconcile past payments of utility charges and adjust future estimates of the Utility Charge to reflect Lessee's actual usage. 11. Interference with Communications. Lessee's Facilities and operations shall not interfere with the communications configurations, frequencies or operating equipment which exist on Lessor's Real Property on the effective date of this Lease Agreement ("Pre-existing Communications"), and Lessee's Facilities and operations shall comply with all non-interference rules of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"). Upon written notice from Lessor of apparent interference by Lessee with Pre-existing Communications, Lessee shall have the responsibility to promptly terminate such interference or demonstrate to Lessor with competent information that the apparent interference in fact is not caused by Lessee's Facilities or operations. Lessor shall not, nor shall Lessor permit any other tenant or occupant of any portion of Lessor's Real Property to, engage in any activities or operations which interfere with the communications operations of Lessee described in Section 2, above. Such interference with Lessee's communications operations shall be deemed a material breach by Lessor, and Lessor shall have the responsibility to promptly terminate said interference. In the event any such interference does not cease promptly, the parties acknowledge that continuing interference will cause irreparable injury to Lessee, and therefore Lessee shall have the right to bring a court action to enjoin such interference or to terminate this Lease Agreement immediately upon notice to Lessor. Lessor agrees to incorporate equivalent provisions regarding non-interference with Pre-existing Communications into any subsequent leases, licenses or rental agreements with other persons or entities for any portions of Lessor's Real Property. 12. Taxes. Lessee shall pay personal property taxes assessed against Lessoo's Facilities, and Lessor shall pay when due all real property taxes and all other taxes, fees and assessments Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 4 of 14 attributable to the Premises and this Lease Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for any increase in Lessor's real property taxes that is directly attributable to Lessee's installation. As a condition of such reimbursement, Lessor shall provide Lessee with documentation from the taxing authority evidencing that such increase is a result of Lessee's installation. 13. Termination. This Lease Agreement may be terminated by Lessee effective immediately without further liability by delivery of written notice thereof to Lessor prior to the Commencement Date for any reason resulting from Lessee's Due Diligence, or if a title report obtained by Lessee for Lessor's Real Property shows any defects of title or any liens or encumbrances which may adversely affect Lessee's use of the Premises for Lessee's intended use, or for any other or no reason. This Lease may be terminated without further liability on thirty (30) days prior written notice as follows: (i) by either party upon a default of any covenant, condition, or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured within sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice of default; (ii) by Lessee if it does not obtain licenses, permits or other approvals necessary to the construction or operation of Leasee's Facilities ("Permits"), is unable to obtain such Permits without conditions which are not standard or typical for premises where wireless communications facilities are located or is unable to maintain such licenses, permits or approvals despite reasonable efforts to do so; (iii) by Lessee if Lessee is unable to occupy or utilize the Premises due to ruling or directive of the FCC or other governmental or regulatory agency, including, but not limited to, a take back of frequencies; or (iv) by Lessee if Lessee determines that the Premises are not appropriate for its operations for economic, environmental or technological reasons, including, without limitation, signal strength or interference. Other than as stated herein, Lessor shall not have the right to terminate, revoke or cancel this Lease Agreement. 14. Destruction of Premises. If the Premises or Lessor's Property is destroyed or damaged so as in Lessee's judgment to hinder its effective use of Lessor's Property for the ongoing operation of a wireless communications site, Lessee may elect to terminate this Lease Agreement without further liability of Lessee as of the date of the damage or destruction by so notifying Lessor no more than thirty (30) days following the date of damage or destruction. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties which do not survive the termination of this Lease Agreement shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction. 15. Condemnation. If a condemning authority takes all of Lessor's Real Property, or a portion which in Lessee's reasonable opinion is sufficient to render the Premises unsuitable for Lessee's ongoing operation of a wireless communications site, then this Lease Agreement shall terminate without further liability of Lessee as of the date when possession is delivered to the condemning authority, in any condemnation proceeding each party shall be entitled to make a claim against the condemning authority for just compensation recoverable under applicable condemnation law. Sale of all or part of the Premises to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of its power of eminent domain shall be treated as a taking by a condemning authority. 16. Insurance. L?s._ee shall maintain the fo~llowing insurance: (1) Commercial General Liability with limits of ! II [ per occurrence and r'--- -- (2) Automobile Liability with a combined single limit l per accident, (3) Workers Compensation as required by law, and (4) Employer's Liability with limits of ..... fill} per occurrence. Lessee may satisfy the above insurance through an umbrella policy. Lessor, at Lessor's sole cost and expense, shall procure and Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 5 of 14 main?n on the Property, bodily injury and property damage insurance with a combined single limit of at least _ ' .......... per occurrence. Such insurance shall insure, on an occurrence basis, against liability of Lessor, its employees and agents arising out of or in connection with Lessor's use, occupancy and maintenance of the Property. Lessor shall be named as an additional insured on the Lessee's other's policy. Lessee shall provide the Lessor with a certificate of insurance evidencing the coverage required by this paragraph within thirty (30) days of the Commencement Date. Each party .waives any rights of recovery against the other for injury or loss due to hazards covered by their property tnsurance, and each party shall require such insurance policies to contain a waiver of recovery against the other. 17. Assianments or Transfers. Lessor may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement to any person or entity without any requirement for prior approval by Lessee, provided that such assignee or transferee agrees in writing to fulfill the duties and obligations of the Lessor in said Lease Agreement, including the obligation to respect Lessee's rights to nondisturbance and quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the remainder of the Term and any Renewal Term hereof. Lessee may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement without prior approval by Lessor to any of Lessee's partners, shareholders, members, subsidiaries, or affiliates, to any entity in which Lessee or any of its affiliates holds an ownership interest, or to a person or entity acquiring by purchase, merger or operation of law a majority of the value of the assets of Lessee or to any entity whose business is the ownership of telecommunication towers. Lessee shall not assign or transfer this Lease Agreement to any other person or entity without the prior written approval of Lessor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Lessee may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement upon written notice to Lessor provided that any such assignee assumes all of Lessee's obligations hereunder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Lessee may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer without consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing entity, or agent on behalf of any financing entity to whom Lessee (i) has obligations for borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by loans, bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations under or with respect to letters of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof. 18. Subleases. Intentionally Deleted 19. Nondisturbance and Quiet Enjoyment; Subordination; Estoppel Certificat~-. (a) So long as Lessee is not in default under this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall be entitled to quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the term of this Lease Agreement or any Renewal Term, and Lessee shall not be disturbed in its occupancy and use of the Premises. (b) This Lease Agreement shall be subordinate to each and every deed of trust, mortgage or other security instrument which may now or hereafter affect Lassor's Real Property and to any renewals, extensions, supplements, amendments, modifications or replacements thereof. In confirmation of such subordination, Lessee shall execute and deliver promptly any certificate of subordination that Lessor may reasonably request, provided that such certificate acknowledges that this Lease Agreement remains in full force and effect, recognizes Lessee's right to nondisturbance and quiet enjoyment of the Premises so long as Lessee is not in default under this Lease Agreement, only contains Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 6 ofl4 true and accurate statements and Lessee's liability shall be capped at the remaining rent under this Lease Agreement. If any mortgagee or lender succeeds to Lessor's interest in Lessor's Real Properly through a foreclosure proceeding or by a deed in lieu of foreclosure, Lessee shall attorn to and recognize such successor as Lessor under this Lease Agreement. (c) At any time upon not less than ten (10) days' prior written notice by Lessor, Lessee shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to Lessor or any other party specified by Lessor a statement in writing certifying that this Lease Agreement is in full force and effect, if true, and the status of any continuing defaults under this Lease Agreement. 20. Indemnifications. (a) Lessee's Indemnity. Lessee hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Lessor and Lessor's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors harmless from and against any and all losses, claims, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) and injuries (including personal injuries or death) arising from or in connection with Lessee's use, operation, maintenance or repair of Lessee's Facilities at the Premises or access over Lessor's Real Property or Lessee's shared use of Lessor's easements for access to the Premises, except those resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor or Lesanr's officers, directors, panners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. (b) Lessor's Indemnity. Lessor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Lessee and Lcssee's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors harmless from and against any and all losses, claims, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) and injuries (including personal injuries or death) arising from or in connection with Lessor's use, operation, maintenance or repair of improvements on Lessor's Real Property, Lessor's shared use of easements for access to Lessor's Real Property, any violation of governmental regulations relating to the Premises and any towers used by Lessee (including the lighting or painting for aviation pathways), except those resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of Lessee or Lessee's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. (c) Survival of Indemnity Provisions. The indemnity provisions of this section shall survive the expiration, cancellation or expiration of this Lease Agreement. 21. Hazardous Materials. Lessee agrees that it will not use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Lessor's Real Property in violation of any law or regulation. Lessor represents, warrants and agrees (1) that neither Lessor nor, to Lessors knowledge, any third party has used, generated, stored or disposed of, or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material (defined below) on, under, about or within Lessor's Real Proper~ in violation of any law or regulation, and (2) that Lessor will not, and will not permit any third party to use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within Lessor's Real Property in violation of any taw or regulation. Lessor and Lessee each agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other and the other's partners, affiliates, agents and employees against any and all losses, liabilities, claims and/or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costa) arising fi.om any breach of any representation, warranty or agreement contained in this paragraph. As used in this paragraph, Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 7 of 14 "Hazardous Material" shall mean petroleum or any petroleum product, asbestos, any substance known by the state in which Lessor's Real Property is located to cause cancer and/or reproductive toxicity, and/or any substance, chemical or waste that is identified as hazardous, toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. This paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 22. Notices and l}eliverie~.. Any notice or demand required to be given herein shall be made by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, confirmed fax, or reliable overnight del/very service to the address of the raspeetive parties set forth below: P.O. Box 333, Main Road, Orient Point, NY 11957 Attn: Bob Haas Telephone: 631-323-2424 Facsimile: Federal Taxpayer ID Number: Lessee: MetroPCS New York, LLC 2250 Lakeside Blvd. Richardson, Texas 75082 Attn: Property Manager Telephone: 215-265-2550 Facsimile: 866-457-4126 With a copy to: MetroPCS 5 Skyline Drive Hawthorne, NY 10532 Att'n: Site Development Dept. Lessor or Lessee may from time to time designate any other address for notices or deliveries by written notice to the other party. 23. Miscellaneous. (a) Severability. If any provision of the Lease Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction with respect to any party, the remainder of this Lease Agreement or the application of such provision to persons other than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected, each provision of this Lease Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law, and the parties shall negotiate in good faith to amend this Lease Agreement to retain the economic effect of the invalid or unenforceable provisions. (b) ~. Each party represents and warrants that said party has full power and authority, and the person(s) executing this Lease Agreement have full power and authority, to execute and deliver this Lease Agreement, and that this Lease Agreement constitutes a valid and binding obligation of each party, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other laws affecting the enforcement of creditor's rights generally and by general equitable principles (whether enforcement is Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 Page 8 of 14 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 sought in proceedings in equity or at law). This Lease Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and permitted assignees of the respective parties. (c) .Waivers. No provision of this Lease Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by a party unless the waiver is in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of the waiver is attempted. No custom or practice which may develop between the parties in the implementation or administration of the terms of this Lease Agreement shall be construed to waive or lessen any right to insist upon strict performance of the terms of this Lease Agreement. (d) Govern. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State in which the Premises are located. (e) Attorneys' Fees and Cost~, The prevailing party in any legal claim arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs. (0 Survival. Terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement which by their sense and context survive the termination, cancellation or expiration of this Lease Agreement will so survive. (g) Memorandum of Lease. Lessor acknowledges that a Memorandum of Agreement substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit C will be recorded by Lessee in the Official Records of the County where the Property is located. (h) Entire Aereementl Amendment,. This Lease Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding Lessee's lease of the Premises and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous offers, negotiations and other agreements concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Lease Agreement must be in writing and executed by duly authorized representatives of both parties. (1) No Presumptions Regarding Prenaration of Lease Agreement. The parties acknowledge and agree that each of the parties has been represented by counsel or has had full opportunity to consult with counsel and that each of the parties has participated in the negotiation and drafting of this Lease Agreement. Accordingly it is the intention and agreement of the parties that the language, terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement are not to be construed in any way against or in favor of any party hereto by reason of the roles and responsibilities of the parties or their counsel in connection with the preparation of this Lease Agreement. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 Page 9 of 14 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Lease Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates set forth below and acknowledge that this Lease Agreement is effective as oftbe date first above written. LESSOR: Print Name: Title: Date: By: -~ (Signature) LESSEE: ~ MetroPCS !~ew Yorl~ l~l~ a Delawarfl imitc~ By: ~%S ~gnature Print Name:Dan Olmetti Title: Vice President/GM Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient., NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 100f14 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF LESSOR'S REAL PROPERTY to the Lease Agreement dated ,200__, by and between MGH Enterprises, Inc., a New York corporation, as Lessor, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Lessee. Lessor's Property of which Premises are a part is described as follows: Assessors Parcel Number: _ Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8 Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 11 of 14 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES to the Lease Agreement dated ,200_.., by and between MGH Enterprises, Inc., a New York corporation, as Lessor, and MetroPCS New York LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Lessee. The Premises consist of those specific areas described/shown below or attached where Lessee's communications antennae, equipment and cables occupy Lessor's Real Property. The Premises and the associated utility connections and access, including easements, ingress, egress, dimensions, and locations as described/shown, are approximate only and may be adjusted or changed by Lessee at the time of construction to reasonably accommodate sound engineering criteria and the physical features of Lessor's Real Property. SEE ATTACHED DRAWINGS (,4 final drawing or copy of a property survey or site plan depicting the above shah replace this Exhibit B when initialed by Lessor or Lessor's designated agent and may be modified from time to time when initialed by both Lessor and Lessee.) Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 12 of 14 MAIN ROAD (I~9[JTE 25) )PARTIAL 51TE PLAN DESIGN'; OROUP_z '~"' K.E¥ PLAN 4 GITE PLAN ,,o~,. 4¢2¢¢ MAIN metroPCS LE-I EXHIBIT C MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CLERK: Please return this document to: MetroPCS New York, LLC 5 Skyline Drive Hawthorne, NY 10532 Atm.: Property Manager This Memorandum of Agreement is entered into on this day of , , by and between MGH Enterprises, Inc. , a New York Corporation, with an office at P.O. Box 333, Main Road, Orient Point, NY 11957 (hereinafter referred to as "Lessor"), and MetroPCS New York LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with an office at 5 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532(hareinaffer referred to as "Lessee"). I. Lessor and Lessee entered into a Communications Site Lease Agreement ["Agreement"] on the day of , for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining a communications facility and'other improvements. All of the foregoing is set forth in the Agreement. 2. The term of the Agreement is for five (5) years commencing on start of construction or 18 months from fi~ll execution, whichever first occurs ("Commencement Date") and terminating on the fifth (Sth) fifth anniversary of the Commencement Date, with four (4) successive five (5) year options to renew. 3. The Land which is the subject of the Agreement is described in Exhibit A annexed hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Agreement as of the day and year first above written. LESSOR: MGH Enterprises, Inc., a New York Corporation LESSEE: MetroPCS New York LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: By: Name: Title: Date: Site No.; NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 13 of 14 STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instmmant and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacit(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public (SEAL) STATEOF COUNTY OF On , before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacit(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public (SEAL) Site No.: NY 7320 Site Address: 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 EXECUTION COPY 5.7.09 Page 14ofl4 Notice Criteria Tool Fedex'al Aviation Adrninisiralion Notice Criteria Tool The requirements for filing with the Federal Aviation Administration for proposed structures vary based on a number of factors: height, proximity to an airport, location, and frequencies emitted from the structure, etc. For more details, please reference CFR Title ~4 Part 77 13 You must file with the FAA at least 30 days prior to construction if: ,our structure will exceed 200ft above ground level ,our structure will be in proximity to an airport and will exceed the slope ratio ,our structure involves construction of a traverseway (ie. highway, railroad, waterway etc. ~) ,our structure will emit frequencies, and does not meet the conditions of the FAA Co-locafion Policy ,our structure will be in an instrument approach area and might exceed part 77 Subpart C ,our structure will be on an airpod or heliport If you equ e add ona nformat on regarding the fiting requirements for your structure, please identify and contact the appropriate FAA representative using the Air Traffic Areas of Responsibility map for Off Airport construction, or contact the FAA Airpods Region / District Office for On Airpod construction The tool below will assist in applying the appropriate slope calculations per Part 77 Notice Criteria. Longitude: ~Deg ~H ~S Horizontal Datum: NAD83 Results You do not exceed Notice Criteria https://oeaaa.£aa.gov/oeaaa/external/gisTools/gisAction.j sp?action=doNoNoticeRequiredT... 1/13/2010 Wireless Tel:ecommunications Bureau aaio TaTion Authorization LICENSEE NAME: M,troPc5 Aws. LLC FCC Registration Number (FEN) 0015005595 Call Sign ' File Number 00027738'70 Radio S ePvice MHz banUs ~ant Dote EffectiVe Ddte 11-29-2006 11-29-2006 Expiration Date P~nt Date 11-29-2021 11-30-2006 Market Number C~annel BloCk Sub-Market Designator REAO01 D 0 ~ I si Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date 3rd Build-out Date j 4~h Sui~-out Date SPECIAL CONDITIONS O~ WAIVERS/CONDiTIONS This authorization is Conditioned upon [he ]~cebst%e~ prior to initia±ing opera{%ons from any b~se or Conditions: Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the CommuniCations A~ ~f 1934, as amended, 47 !J;S.C. Section 309(h), this license is subject tO the following conditions: This license shall rm~t vest in the licensee any rightto operate the st~li0n neF any dght in the use of the frequencies designated in the iiaense beyond the term thereof nor ir~ any other manner than authorized he[ein. Neither the license nor the fight g'rantecl thereunder ~hall be (3~i. gn'ed er otherwb· trcmtferted ih Vfelatien of the Communf~tic~s Act of 1934, as omended~ see 47 U.S;C. Beotion 310[d). This license is Sublet in terms to the fight of use or control conferred by ;~ection 706 of the CommunicatiOns Actor 1934, as amended. See 47 U,S.C, Section 606. ITo view the geographic areas a~.sociated with the licen~e, go to the ~niversal Licensing ~ystem (ULS) homepage, at :' ' ' 'i i . ' ' ar h for license informc~on. hffp//w~reless fcc goV/ub and select "bce~se Search" Follow the ~ns~rucfions on how fo se c Lic e~s~e Name: Call Sign Rie Number Print Dote FCC 601 - MEI UL, il~icense - Cellular License - KN~I~310 - NEW C1NGULAR WlRELES... 1 of 1 - Thursday, August 16, 2007 Celi laT License - KNKA310 - NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC Call Sign KNKA310 Status Active Iqarket Market CMA001 - New York, NY-NJ/Nassau- Suffolk Submarket 0 Dates Grant 08/16/2005 Effective 02/08/2007 Five Year Buildout Date 01/17/2000 Control Points 1 2 Radio Service CL - Cellular Auth Type Regular Channel Block A Phase 2 Expiration 10/01/2015 Cancellation 87 W. PASSAIC STREET, ROCHELLE PARK, NJ Manhattan Switch, 810 7th Avenue, New York, NY Licensee FRN 0003291192 Licensee NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC 5601 LEGACY DRIVE, MS: A-3 PLANOt TX 75024 A~i-N KELLYE E. ABERNATHY Type dJmit'e~ ]_~abdlty Compagy ~ %,~; ~:~,' P:(469)229-7422 F:(469)229-7297 E: KELLYE. E.ABERNATHY@CINGULAR.COM Contact AT&T MOBILITY LLC DAVID C JATLOW 11760 US HIGHWAY 1 NORTH PALM BEACH, FL 33408 P:(202)255-1679 F:(561)279-2097 E: DAVID.JATLOW @CI NGU LAR.COM Ownership and (~ualificatlons Radio Service Type Mobile ReguJatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Demographics Race Ethnicity Gender U. LS License - PCS Broadband Lice~ - KNLG502 - New Cingular Wireles...~lage 1 of 2 - Thursday, August 16, 2007 ULS License PCS, Broadband License - KNLG502 - New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Call Sign KNLG502 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband Status Active Auth Type Regular Market Market BTA321 - New York, NY Channel Block E Submarket I Associated 001885.00000000- Frequencies 001890.00000000 (MHz) 001965.00000000- 001970.00000000 Dates Grant 08/15/2007 Expiration Effective 08/15/2007 Cancellation Buildout Deadlines 1st 06/27/2002 2nd Notification Dates 1st 05/29/2002 2nd 06/27/2017 Licensee FRN 0003291192 Licensee New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC 5601 LEGACY DRIVE, NS: A-3 PLANO, TX 75024 A~FN FCC GROUP Type P:(469)229-7422 F:(469)229-7295 Limited Liability Company Contact AT&T MOBILITY LLC KELLYE ABERNATHY 5601 LEGACY DRIVE, MS: A-3 PIANO, TX 75024 P: (469)229-7422 F: (469)229-7295 E: KELLYE. E.ABERNATHY~CING U LAR.CO M Ownership and Qualifications Radio Service Type Plobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits. Demographics Race Ethnicity Gender August 7, 2009 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Structural Verification of Proposed 80 ft AGL RFC Monopole New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC # NYCENY1059/LI-1059 and metroPCS Wireless, Inc. # NY7320 Orient By The Sea Restaurant 40200Main Road Orient Point, NY 11957 WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ARCHITECT ~¥y S, Shumway WFC Project # 05-6478 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: On behalf of New Cingular Wireless, LLC and metroPCS Wireless, Inc.; William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP (WFC) concurs that the proposed 80'-0" AGL Monopole for the above referenced site will be designed to conform with all State and Local Codes, Telecommunications Industxy Association / Electronics Industry Association (TIA/EIA) Standard 222-F and Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design at 85 mph basic wind speed with no ice and a 73.6 mph basic wind speed with 0.5 inch radial ice. All antenna feeder cables will be routed within the pole. Proposed monopole loading is as follows: 1- Lightning Rod, 8' @ 80'-0"AGL 3- AT&T Mobility - Kathrein # 800-i0121 Antennas mounted within pole ~ 77'-0" AGL, Rad. Cntr. 3- Future Carrier - Kathrein # 800-10121 Antennas mounted within pole ~ 67'-0" AGL, Rad. Cntr. 3- metroPCS - Kathrein - Werke KG # 800-10504 Antennas mounted within pole ~ 57'-0" AGL, Rad. Cntr. We trust the above is clear and as complete as necessary for this purpose. Regards, Managing' 10-1 TE£HNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, N~ 11733 PH: 631-689~8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 W~,W.WFCAIA.COM Pi~cl£ T£1£co~ Group Consulting and Engineerfng Services Antenna SiTE FCC MPE Compliance AssessmenT and Report Cingular Wireless and MetroPCS 40200 Main Road Orient Point, NY June 18, 2009 14 Ridgedale Avenue - Suite 209 Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927 · 973-451-1630 CONTENTS Introduction and Summary AnTenna and Transmission Data Mathematical Compliance Analysis Compliance Conclusion Certification 3 5 7 11 12 Appendix A. Background on the FCC MPE Limit Appendix B. FCC Public Notice on Cellular and PCS Transmitters Appendix C. Summary of Expert Qualifications Introduction and Summary At the request of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("Cingular") and MetroPCS, Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed this independent assessment of wireless antenna radiofrequency (RF) emissions and FCC compliance related to a proposed wireless base station operation involving a new monopole to be erected along Main Road (Route 25) in Orient Point, NY. Cingular refers to the antenna site by the code "NYCENY1059 / L1-1059", and MetroPCS refers to the antenna site by the code "NY7320". The FCC requires all wireless system operators to perform an assessment of potential human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) emissions from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC's regulations, in this case, the only antenna operations of interest are the ones being proposed. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula - and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, though, as long as the results indicate RF levels consistently below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case calculated result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below-the-limit factor". The result of the FCC RF compliance assessment in this case is as follows: [] The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the proposed antenna operations is 0.7319 percent (i.e., less than three-quarters of one percent) of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, even with the significant degree of conservatism incorporated in the analysis, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 136 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. u The results of the calculations clearly demonstrate that the RF levels from the combination of proposed antenna operations will satisfy the FCC MPE compliance requirement. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and operational assumptions incorporated in the calculations, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than these calculation results indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: technical data on the proposed Cingular Wireless and MetroPCS antenna operations; ~ a description of the FCC mathematical model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant data to that model; and [] analysis of the results, and a compliance conclusion for the site. In addition, three Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit, along with a list of key references. Appendix B provides a copy of the FCC's public notice on the potential exposure from cellular and PCS transmitters, to wit, that it is insignificantly Iow and has no effect on the human health environment. Appendix C provides a summary of the expert qualifications of the author of this report. Antenna and Transmission Data The Cingular proposal involves directional panel antennas and transmission in the 850 MHz and 1900 MHz frequency bands, with an antenna centerline height of 77 feet AGL. The table that follows summarizes the relevant technical data for the proposed Cingular antenna operations in each band. 40 watts RF Channels Sector 28 watts and 1 40 watts MetroPCS is licensed by the FCC to operate in the 2130 MHz band. The proposed antenna centedine height will be 57 feet AGL. The table that follows summarizes the relevant technical data for the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation. MetroPCS - 2~00 MHz Antenna Manufacturer & Model (Max. Gain) Kathrein 800-10504 (17.8 dBi) ~F Channels ~er Sector 7 ~ 24 watts The antenna vertical-plane emission pattern (relative to the antenna's main beam gain) is used in calculating RF levels and assessing compliance at ground level around a site. By way of illustration, a diagram illustrating the vertical-plane patterns of the proposed Cingular and MetroPCS antennas are shown on the next page. 5 Kathrein 800-10121 -Vertical-plane Emission Pattern 0 deg horizon 5 dB / di~sion Kathrein 800-10504- Vertical-plane Emission Pattern 0 deg hodzon 5 dB / division 6 Mathematical Compliance Analysis FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest - and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach. The FCC's formula for street-level RF compliance calculations for any given wireless antenna operation is shown below. MPE% = (100 * TxPower * 10 (~ma~-vdis~0) . 4 ) / ( MPE * 4~ * R2 ) where MPE% 100 TxPower '~ 0 (Gmax-Vdisc/lO) RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public factor to convert the raw result to a percentage maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest, referenced to any applied antenna mechanical downtilt; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications 4 factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (22 = 4) MPE R = FCC general population MPE limit = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated below. height from antenna bottom to 6.5' above ground level  a 0 "500 Ground Distance D from the site MPE% Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level - which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. 8 FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation (including each frequency band), and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represent non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that serves as a demonstration of compliance with the limit. Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas and sectorized coverage arrangements are used, the compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single antenna sector (or, in cases of non-identical parameters, the worst-case effect of any individual sector). Based on FCC guidelines, the following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power. We also ignore the attenuation effects associated with the antenna cabling ("antenna line loss"). 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and per[orming the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centedine) of the lowest-mounted antenna for each operator. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "pedect" field reflection from the ground itself. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur - and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very. "safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table that follows provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operation, with the worst-case overall result highlighted in bold in the last column. Ground Cingular Cingular MetroPCS Total Distance 850 MHz 1900 MHz 2130 MHz ~ MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% 0 0.0101 0.0000 0.0590 0.0691 20 0.0336 0.0070 0.4038 0.4444 40 0.0330 0.0035 0.2785 0.3150 60 0.0136 0.0561 0.3127 0.3824 80 0.1417 0.0000 0.2037 0.3454 100 0.0968 0.1153 0.1611 0.3732 120 0.0069 0.3192 0.2352 0.5613 140 0.1416 0.1894 0.0798 0.4108 160 0.3560 0.0253 0.1918 0.5731 180 0.5240 0.0041 0.2038 0.7319 200 0.5052 0.0073 0.1550 0.6675 220 0.4021 0,0219 0.0983 0.5223 240 0.2465 0.0513 0,0621 0.3599 260 0.0964 0.0513 0.0480 0.1957 280 0,0409 0.0326 0.0548 0.1283 300 0.0136 0.0158 0.0479 0.0773 320 0.0144 0.0114 0.0803 0.1061 340 0.0423 0.0228 0.0713 0.1364 360 0.0946 0.0443 0.1438 0.2827 380 0.0854 0.0402 0.1293 0.2549 400 0,1521 0.0576 0.2568 0.4665 420 0.2342 0.0608 0.2332 0.5282 440 0.2142 0.0557 0.2128 0.4827 460 0.2998 0.0421 0.3834 0.7253 480 0.2762 0.0386 0.3525 0.6673 500 0.2551 0.0358 0.3251 0.6160 As indicated, even with the significant degree of conservatism built into the calculations, the maximum calculated RF level is only 0.7319 percent (i.e., less than three-quarters of one percent) of the FCC MPE limit. A graph of the calculation results, provided on the next page, probably provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line representing the calculated total MPE% results barely rises above the graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. 10 120 nLu 100 m. 80 ~ 60 ~ 40 0 ~ 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS Normalized FCC MPE Limit · Total MPE% Resurts I I 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) Compliance Conclusion The FCC MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and completely safe. In this case, the conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed antenna operations at the site is only 0.7319 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, even with the conservative methodology and operational assumptions incorporated in the analysis, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 136 times below the MPE limit. The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of FCC compliance. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions applied in the analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas here will be even less significant than the calculations indicate. 11 CerTification It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fie~ds (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the antenna emissions at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RF exposure. Chief Technical Officer Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC 6/18/09 Date 12 Appendix A: Background on the FCC MPE Limit FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community - notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions - and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health dsk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's MPE limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cra2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 13 Frequency Range (F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) ( mW/cm2 ) ( mWIcm2 ) 0.3 - 1.34 100 100 1.34- 3.0 100 180 / F2 3.0- 30 900 / F2 180/F2 30 - 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F / 300 F / 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mW/cm2) 100 5.0 1.0 0.2 OccupatJonal ......... General Public I I I I I I ¥~ I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency (MHz) Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 14 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. FCC References 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 22 (Public Mobile Services). 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 24 (Personal Communications Services). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (WI' Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effecfs of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, "Questions and Answers About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition 4, August 1999. 15 Appendix B: FCC Public NOTice on Cellular and PCS Transmitters FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION OFFICE OF ENGINEERING & TECItNOLOGY WASttlNGTON, D.C. 20554 January 1998 ****************************************************************************** INFORMATION ON HUMAN EXPOSURE TO RADIOFREQUENCY FIELDS FROM CELLULAR AND PCS RADIO TRANSMITTERS ****************************************************************************** (1) Cellular and PCS base stations Radio frequencies constitute part of the overall electromagnetic spectrum. Cellular communications systems use frequencies in the 800-900 megahertz (IvlHz) portion of the radiofrequency (RF) spectrum (frequencies formerly used for UHF-TV broadcasting), and transmitters in the Personal Communications Service (PCS) use frequencies in the range of 1850-1990 MHz. Primary antennas for cellular and PCS transmissions are usually located on towers, water tanks and other elevated structures including rooftops and the sides of buildings. The combination of antennas and associated electronic equipment is referred to as a cellular or PCS base station" or "cell site." Typical heights for base station towers or structures are 50-200 feet. A typical cellular base station may utilize several "omni-directional" antennas that look like poles or whips, I0 to I5 feet in length. PCS (and also many cellular) base stations use a number of "sector" antennas that look like rectangular panels. The dimensions of a sector antenna are typically 1 foot by 4 feet. Antennas are usually arranged in three groups of three with one antenna in each group used to transmit signals to mobile Umts (car phones or hand-held phones). The other two antennas in each group are used to receive signals from mobile units. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authorizes cellular and PCS carriers in various service areas around the country. At a cell site, the total RF power that could be transm/tted from each transmitting antenna at a cell site depends on the number of radio channels (transmitters) that have been authorized and the power of each transmitter. Typically, for a cellular base station, a maximum of 21 channels per sector (depending on the system) could be used. Thus, for a typical cell site utilizing sector antennas, each of the three transmitting antennas could be connected to up to 21 transmitters for a total of 63 transmitters per site. When om-directional antennas are used, up to 96 transmitters could be implemented at a cell site, but this would be very unusual. While a typical base station could have as many as 63 transmitters, not ail of the transmitters would be expected to operate simultaneously thus reducing overall emission levels. For the case of PCS base stations, fewer transmitters are normally required due to the relatively greater number of base stations. Although the FCC perm/ts an effective radiated power (ERP) of up to 500 watts per channel (depending on the tower height), the majority of cellular base stations in urban and suburban areas operate at an ERP of 100 watts per channel or less. An ERP of 100 watts corresponds to an actual radiated power of 5-I 0 watts, depending on the type of antenna used (ERP is not equivalent to the power that is radiated but is a measure of the directional characteristics of the antenna). As the capacity of a system is expanded by dividing cells, i.e., adding additional base stations, lower ERPs are normally used. In urban areas, an ERP of 10 watts per channel (corresponding to a radiated power of 0.5 - 1 watt) or less is commonly used. For PCS base stations, even lower radiated power levels are normally used. The signal from a cellular or PCS base station antenna is essentially directed toward the horizon in a relatively narrow beam in the vertical plane. For example, the radiation pattern for an omi-directional antenna might be compared to a thin doughnut or pancake centered around the antenna while the pattem for a sector antenna is fan-shaped, like a wedge cut from a pie. As with all forms of electromagnetic energy, the power density from a cellular or PCS transmitter decreases rapidly (according to an inverse square law) as one moves away from the antenna. Consequently, normal ground-level exposure is much less than exposures that m/ght be encountered if one were very close to the antenna and in its main transm/tted beam. Measurements made near typical cellular and PCS installations have shown that ground-level power densities are well below limits recommended by RF/microwave safety standards. In 1996, the FCC adopted updated guidelines for evaluating human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields from fixed transmitting antennas such as those used for cellular radio and PCS base stations.1 The new guidelines for cellular and PCS base stations are identical to those recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP).2 These guidelines are also similar to the 1992 guidelines recommended by the Amerinan National Standards Institute and the Institute of Electrical and Electron/cs Engineers (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992).3 The FCC adopted guidelines for hand-held RF devices, such as cellular and PCS phones, that are the same as those recommended by the ANSI/IEEE and NCRP guidelines (see later discussion). 1 FCC Report and Order in ET Docket 93-62, 61 Federal Register 41006 (August 7, 1996); I1 FCC Record 15123 (1997). See also, FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, 62 Federal Register 47960 (September 12, 1997), 12 FCC Record 13494 (1997). For more information on these documents contact the FCC's toil-free number: 1-888-CALL FCC (1-888- 225-5322). They may also be viewed and downloaded at the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology World Wide Web Site under the "RF Safety" heading at the following address: www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety. The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are based on recommendations made to the FCC by U.S. federal safety and health agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Food and Drag Administration (FDA), the National Iushtute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2 The NCRP is a non-profit corporation chartered by congress to develop information and recommendations concerning radiation protection. 3 The American National Standards Institute is a non-profit, privately-funded, membership orgarfization that coordinates development of voluntary national standards in the United States. The IEEE is a non-profit technical and professional eng/neering society. 17 In the case of cellular base station transmitters, at a frequency of 869 MHz (the lowest frequency used), the FCC's RF exposure guidelines recommend a max/mum permissible exposure level of the general public (or exposure in "uncontrolled" environments) of about 580 microwatts per square centimeter (gW/cm 2 ), as averaged over any thirty-minute per/od. This limit is many times greater than RF levels typical found near the base of typical cellular towers or in the vicinity of other, lower-powered cellular base station transmitters. For example, measurement data obtained from various sources have consistently indicated that "worst-case" ground-level power densities near typical cellular towers are on the order of 1 ~W/cm 2 or less (usually significantly less). Calculations corresponding to a "worst-case" situation (all transmitters operating simultaneously and continuously at the maximum licensed power) show that in order to be exposed to levels near the FCC's limits for cellular frequencies, an individual would essentially have to remain in the matin transmitting beam (at the height of the antenna) and within a few feet from the antenna. This makes it extremely unlikely that a member of the general public could be exposed to RF levels in excess of these guidelines from cellular base station transmitters. For PCS base station transmitters, the same type of analysis holds, except that at the PCS transmitting frequencies (1850-1990 MHz) the FCC's exposure limits for the public are 1000 gW/cm 2. Therefore, there would typically be an even greater margin of safety between actual public exposure levels and the recogrfized safety lim/t. When cellular and PCS antennas are mounted at rooftop locations it is possible that RF levels greater than I gW/cm 2 could be present on the rooftop itself. This might become an issue if the rooftop were accessible to maintenance personnel or others. However, exposures approaching or exceeding the safety guidelines are only likely to be encountered very close to and directly in front of the antennas. Even ifRF levels were to be higher than desirable on a rooftop, appropriate restrictions could be placed on access. Factoring in the time-averaging aspects of safety standards could also be used to reduce potential exposure. The fact that rooftop cellular and PCS antennas usually operate at lower power levels than antennas on freestanding towers makes excessive exposure conditions on rooftops even less likely. This reason and the significant signal attenuation of a building's roof also minimizes any chance for hanu~l exposure of persons living or working within the building itself. (2) Mobile (vehicle-mounted) antennas Vehicle-mounted antennas used for cellular communications normally operate at a power level of 3 watts or less. These cellular antennas are typically mounted on the roof, on the trunk, or on the rear window of a car or truck. Studies have shown that in order to be exposed to P,_F levels that approach the safety guidelines it would be necessary to remain very close to a vehicle-mounted cellular antenna. For example, a study done for AT&T Bell Laboratories by the University of Washington documented typical and "worst-case" exposure levels and specific absorption rates (SAR) for vehicle occupants and persons standing close to vehicle-mounted cellular antennas. Worst-case exposure conditions were considered when an individual was at the closest possible distance from the antenna. Several configurations were tested using adult and child "phantom" models. The results of this study showed that the highest exposure (1900 [tW/cm 2 ) occurred with a female model at a distance of 9.7 cm (3.8 inches) from one of the antennas operating at a power level of 3 watts. Although this level is nominally in excess of the FCC's exposure lira/ts for power density at this frequency, analysis of the data indicated that the antenna would have to be driven to 7 W of power before the limit for specific absorlm'on rate (SAR) allowed by the FCC guidelines would be exceeded. The intem~ittent nature of transmission and the improbability that a person would remain so close to the antenna for any length of time further reduces the potential for excessive exposure. The University of Washington study also indicated that vehicle occupants are effectively shielded by the metal body. Motorola, Inc., in comments filed with the FCC, has expressed the opinion that proper installation of a vehicle-mounted antenna to maximize the shielding effect is an effective way of lim/ting exposure. Motorola and other companies have recommended antenna installation either in the center of the roof or the center of the think. In response to concerns expressed over the commonly-used rear-window mounted cellular antennas, Motorola has recommended a minimum separation distance of 30-60 cm (1 -2 feet) to minimize exposure to vehicle occupants resulting from antenna mismatch for this type of antenna installation. In summary, from data gathered to date, it appears that properly installed, vehicle- mounted, personal wireless transceivers using up to 3 watts of power would result in maximum exposure levels in or near the veh/cle that are well below the FCC's safety lira/ts. This assumes that the transmitting antenna is at least 15 cm (about 6 inches) or more from vehicle occupants. Time-averaging of exposure (either a 6 or 30miante period is specified) will usually result in still lower values when compared with safety guidelines. (3) Hand-held cellular telephones and PCS devices A question that often arises is whether there may be potential health risks due to the RF emissions from hand-held cellular telephones and PCS devices. The FCC's exposure guidelines, and the ANSI/IEEE and NCRP guidelines upon which they are based, specify limits for human exposure to RF emissions from hand-held RF devices in terms of specific absorption rate (SAR). For exposure of the general public, e.g., exposure of the user of a cellular or PCS phone, the SAR limit is an absorption threshold of 1.6 watts/kg (W/kg), as measured over any one gram of tissue. Measurements and computational analysis of SAR in models of the human head and other studies of SAR distribution using hand-held cellular and PCS phones have shown that, in general, the 1.6 W/kg limit is unlikely to be exceeded under normal conditions of use. Before FCC approval can be granted for marketing of a cellular or PCS phone, compliance 4.with the 1.6 W/kg limit must be demonstrated. Also, testing of hand-held phones is normally done under conditions of maximum power usage. In reality, normal power usage is less and is dependent on distance of the user fi:om the base station transmitter. In recent years publicity, speculation and concern over claim~ of possible health effects due to RF fields from hand-held wireless telephones prompted industry-sponsored groups, such as Wireless Technology Research, L.L.C. (WTR) and Motorola, Inc., to initiate research programs a/med at investigating whether there is any risk to users of these devices. Past studies carried out at frequencies both higher and lower than those used for cellular and PCS phones have led expert organizations to conclude that typical RF exposures from these devices are safe. However, the Federal Government is monitoring the results of the ongoing industry-sponsored research through an inter-agency working group led by the EPA and the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health. In a 1993 "Talk Paper," the FDA stated that it did not have enough information at that time to rule out the possibility of risk, but if such a risk exists "it is probably small." The FDA concluded that there is no proof thnt cellular telephones can be harmful, but if individuals remain concerned several precautionary actions could be taken. These included limiting conversations on hand-held cellular telephones to those that are essential and making greater use of telephones with vehicle-mounted antennas where there is a greater separation distance between the user and the radiating structure. NOTE: For more information on these and other RF-related topics, you may call the FCC's toll-free number: 1-888-CALL FCC (1-888-225-5322) or contact the FCC's RF Safety Program, in the Office of Engineering and Technology, at (202) 418-2464. Information is also available at the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology World Wide Web Site under the 'RF Safety" heading at the following address: www.fcc.gov/oetJrfsafety. 20 Appendix C: Summary of Expert Qualifications Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, I-CC Synopsis: · 37 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure · Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 12,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 · Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,200 times since 1997 · Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, ~ as wellasb the FCC ....... Education: · B.E.E., City College of New York (Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 · M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 · Bronx High School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: · Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: · Edwards & Kelcey, VP- RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 · Bellcore, Executive Director- Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 · AT&T (Corp. HQ), Director- Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 · AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor - Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RFSafety/ · Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: · Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG · While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure · Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and other consulting / engineering firms Other Background: · Author, Microwave System Engineering (AT&T, 1974) · Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993) · National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA) - former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 · Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and International Who's Who in Information Technology ~,~ ...... · Published more than 35 articles in indust~ magazines 21 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other h~formation used by a Town of Southold agency in makir~_g a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary~ modified prior to inaking a determination that it is consistent to the max/mum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places..', onhne, at tl!e~TOwn of S6fi~old's website (southoldtown. nortb2ork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning DepartmelXI, ail Iocal libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTIVI~ 15 9 8.1 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ~-~ Planning Dept. ~-~ Building Dept. ~-~ 1 Board of T~UStees~_~ l. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action Undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital consumction, planning, activity, agency regulation, land wansacti~n) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Un-manned Public Utility Wireless Communication Services Facility consisting of panel antennas mounted within a 80' RF-transparent -monopole, elevated ecluipment ptatforra and trenched conduit. Locationofact~on:40200 Main Rd., Orient Point, New York 11957 Site acreage:. 4.55 Present Iandu~e: R~stanrant :and Marina __ i .... Present zoning classification: Marine II (MII) District If an applioafion for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the follov~ng information shall be provided: (a) Name ofapplicant: New Cincrular Wireless PCS, LLC & MetroPCS New York, LLC ~) Maii~gaddress: Cinqular: 333 Crossways Park Drive, Woodbury, ATY 11797 MetroPCS: 5'Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( )~ Cingalar (516) 677-6503; MetroPCS ' (914) (d) Application number, il'any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agenqy? Yes ~-~ No~] Ifyes, whJch state or federal agency? FCC 593-8501 DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy i. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section Il/- Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No, ~ Not Applicable Refer to attachment A~ach additional sheetz if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic arid archaeologi~cal resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes [] NO [] Not Applicable Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section m- Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No ~ Not'Applicable Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Po[icy 4, Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [-~ Not Applicable Refer to attachment Attach additional Sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [--d So ~ Not App"cahlc Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section m - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes N No ~ Not Applicable Refer to attachments Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy ?. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of SoUthold. See LWRP SectiOn I~ - Policies Pages 32. through 34 for evaluation criteria. ~ Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Appli hle Refer to attachment PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section llI- Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section 1II - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No ~-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound~ the Peconic Estuary and Town waters, See LWRP Section m -Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ['~ Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Iai - Policies; Pages' 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources, See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluatiOn criteria. [] Yes [~ No [] Not Applicable Created on 5/25/05 11:20 AM Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: Construct a new 80-foot ag[ RF-compadble monopole with antennas installed inside within a fenced compound to accommodate equipment.for both New Cinguiar Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS New York, LLC 0Nilliam F. Collins, AIA, revised 7/29/09)(attached). The proposed public Utility wireless communication services facility will be located near the western boundary of the Orient by the Sea restaurant DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy I. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The adverse effects of development are mitigated by siting the proposed telecommunications facility in the only commercially zoned (M-II) land in this pzr: of Reach 5. The proposed location is adjacent to the Cross Sound Ferry terminal and the Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC) USDA ferry terminal. The existing eight-foot high chain link fencing topped with barbed wire, and the t~ll lighting stanchions at the PIADC are not positive enhancements to the scenic qualities of the SE 25s byway. The use of an 80' tall RF-compatible concealment monbpole with antennas mounted inside, p~r:ially screened by the planting of new juniper trees, and the siting of the facility within a commercially zoned are~ will preserve open space, make efficient use of existing infrastructure and minimize the adverse effects of developmeht. In addition, by siting the proposed un-manned telecommunications facility is a commercially developed area, the proposed project will not add to the increasing development pressure on the Town's extensive agricultural areas and on the w~terfront that threatens the rural character of the community and its natural resources. In addition, verbal discussions with government personnel from the Town of Southold conducted in May 2006, and a review of public hearing transcripts indicate that public opposition to the construction of telecommunication towers is generally limited to residential areas, and not the MIl zone for the proposed facility. These objections pertain mainly to aesthetics from obstructed views, and perceived declines in property wlue from the presence of telecommunication towers (Environmental Assessment Report, Orient Point Telecom, Site LI-1059, Block % Lot 8, Town of Southoid, Suffolk County, NY, prepared by AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc., on behalf of GeoTrans, Inc., dated June 9, 2006). With regards to community considerations, Based on the above, the proposed undertaking meets the longstanding planning goals of the Town of Southold which areto "reflect the interest in preserving and enhandng the natural and built environment and providing 0pportun/ties for a level of graph and expansion of the economic base that is compatible with the existing scale of development, availability of water, exi~ng sensitive environmen~ of :he Town and its historic heritage," Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. On May 5, 2009, Richard Grubb and Associates, Inc. completed a Sectio~ 106 consultation package and submitted a request for comments in which they determined that "No Historic Properties" were identified at the location of the proposed undertaking (then a I00' monopole). SHPO policy states: "If the SHPO does not provide wr~en not/ce to the Applicant that it agrees or disagrees with the Applicant's determinat/on of no Historic Properties affected within 30 days following rece/pt of a complete Submission Packet, it is deemed that no Historic Properties exist within the APE. or the Undertaking will have no effect on Historic PropertJes. The Section 106 process is then complete and the Applicant may proceed with the project, unless further processing for reasons other than Section 106 is required." No response from SHPO was received within'the following 30-day comment period. As such, concurrence with the project's determination of "No Historic Properties" was ~ssumed. EBI submitted an addendum to the original submittal that reflects the design change to an 80' monopole on August 28, 2009. The original determination of "No Historic Properties" remained the same. In addition, Sara Ayers-Rigsby, M~ RP~ Project Archae'ologist with EBI Consulting, reviewed the previous ~rchaeological assessment, new site plans, and NYSHPO correspondence for the proposed telecommunications facility at the above-referenced location. It is the professiona] opinion of Ms. Ayers-Rigsby that the shift in the tower position to the north and expansion of the equipment compound from the original I I' x 26' (3.6 x 7.9m) lease area to 12'8" x 29'10" (3.9 x 9.1m), and the 16' x 12' equipment area for future use by MetroPCS does not significantly alter the archaeological findings of Richard Grubb and Associates, Inc., who concluded in April 2006: "The APE-Direct Effects lies in an area of moderate to high potential for prehistoric and Iow potential for historic resources. However, based-on the prior ground disturbances c~used by extensive grading and infiliing related to the cons:ruction of the existing marina, parking lot, wooden fence, and the installation of the existing utilities, it is highly unlikely that significant archaeological resources exist in the APE- Direct Effects. As such, Richard Grubb & Associated recommends no further archaeological survey." Based on the above, the proposed undertaking will protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria A. Minimize introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. The proposed undertaking is located in a commerdally-zoned area and only commerdally zoned (M41) land in this part of Reach $. The proposed location is adJacent to the Cross Sound Ferry terminal and the PIADC USDA ferry terminal. The existing eight-foot high chain link fencing topped v~r~h barbed wire, and the tag lighting stanchions at the PIADC already introduce structures discordant with the neighboring scenic character. In order to mitigate discordant elements introduced by a new telecommunications facility, an 80' tall RF-compatible concealment monopole with antennas mounted inside is proposed, which will reduce its visual footprint. In addition, landscaping, screening and fencing will be designed in accordance with the Town of Southold Wireless Code. Restore deteriorated and remove degraded visual components. N/A Screen components of development which detract from visual quality. Landscaping, screening and fencing will be designed in accordance ~rth the Town of Southold Wireless Code. Use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. ~'he proposed undertaldng is located in a commercially-zoned area and only commerdally zoned (M-II) land in this part of Reach 5. The use of on 80' tall RF-compatible concealment monopole with antennas mounted inside will m/tJgate issues of scale and form when viewed from neighboring non-commercially-zoned land. Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality: I. Preserve existingYegetation which contributes to the scenic quality of the landscape. 2. Allow for selective clearing of vegetation to provide public views without impairing values associated with the affected vegetation. 3. Restore historic or important designed landscapes to preserve intended or designed aesthetic values. 4. Restore or add indigenous vegetative cover that presents a natural appearance. The proposed undertaking will not disturb existing vegetation and new vegetation will be planted in accordance with Town of Southold Wire/ess Code. Improve the visual quality associated with hamlet areas. N/~ Improve the visual quality of historic maritime areas. N/A Protect the visual interest provided by active water-dependent uses. The proposed telecommunications facilit.y in the only commercially Zoned (M-II) land in this part of Reach 5. The proposed location is adjacent to the Cross Sound Ferry terminal and the PIADC USDA ferry terminal. Visual interest provided by active water- dependent uses will not be adversely impacted. Anticipate and prevent impairment of dynamic landscape elements that contribute to ephemeral visual qualities. The proposed telecommunications f~cility in the only commercially zoned (M-Il) land in this part of Reach 5. Dynamic landscape elements that contribute to ephemeral visual qualities will not be affected. Jo Protect visual quality associated with public lands, including public transportation routes, public parks and public trust lands and waters. Siting the proposed telecommunications f~cility in the only commercially zoned (M-II)land in this part of Reach 5, and limiting the height to 80' with antennas placed inside the stealth pole, will mitigate impacts to the visual quality of the area, including Orient Point County Park ~o the east. and Orient Beach State Park to the west The construction of an 80' stealth pole, while taller than existing structures, will not be incompatible with the adjacent commercial f~cilities (Cross Sound Ferry terminal and the PIADC USDA ferry terminal). Orient Point State Park is the most intensely used, publicly-owned, scenic resource in Southold Town. Due to its geographic location, this park provides uninterrupted panoramic vistas of the open waters of Gardiners Bay, and with views of Gardiners Island, Shelter island and Montauk in the distance. The proposed under.king will not interrupt these vistas. The North Fork Seaview Trail follows SR 25 for its entire length within Reach 5. The easternmost terminus of SR 25 runs alongside the staging area of the ferry dock. Both the Cross Sound Ferry terminal and the PIADC USDA ferry terminal already negatively affect the scenic resources of the State-designated Scenic byway on which they front due to the existence of extensive paving and lack of landscaping~ is the prim~zy cause. The introduction of the proposed stealth monopole at the proposed location is the best option to minimize visual intrusions to the area. I. Limit water surface coverage or intrusion to the minimum amount necessary. N/A 2. Limit alteratio? of shoreline elements which contribute to scenic quality. N/A K. Protect visual quality associated with agricultural land, open space and natural resources. Siting the proposed telecommunications facility in the only _commercially zoned (M-II) land in this part of Reach 5, and limiting the height to 80' with antennas placed inside the stealth pole, will mitigate impacts to the visual quality of the area~ The visual quality of agricultural land, open space and natural resources will be protected. I. Maintain or restore original landforms except where altered landforms provide useful screening or contribute to scenic quality. Existing landforms will not be altered. :2. Group or orient structures during site design to preserve open space and provide visual organization. All supporting structures wiII be located within a proposed equipment compound screened by new plantings: 3. Avoid structures or activities which introduce visual interruptions to natural landscapes including: a) introduction of intrusive artificial light sources; Intrusive artificial lighting is riot proposed. b) fragmentation of and structural intrusion into open space areas; open space areas will not be affected c) changes to the continuity and configuration of natural shorelines and associated vegetation The natural shoreline will not be affected Policy 4. Policy 5. Policy 6. Policy 7. Policy 8. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the site area indicates that the property and the surrounding areas are located within Zone AE, which is defined as "Special Flood Hazard Areas Inundated by 100-Year Flood", with a base flood elevation of 9'. The proposed equipment platforms will be raised to mitigate negative impacts to ~he flood storage capacity of the area Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. N/A Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. The proposed undertaking is sited on commercially-developed land and will not impact the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and we:lands. ~ in a response letter dated November 21, 2005 to GeoTrans, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service reported that except for occasional transient individuals, no Federally-listed or proposed endangered or threatened species under their jurisdiction are known to exist within the project impact area. In addition, no habitat in the project impact area is currently designated or proposed "critical habitat" in accordance with provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). According to the "Guidelines for Consultation with NY Natural Heritage regarding Proposed Collocations of Telecommunication Facilitie~ on Existing Towers and Buildings", issued by the New York S~te Department of Environmental Conserwtion (NYSDEC)- Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources, dated May 2009, for communications ~acilides projects that involve "New or existing towers, antennae, and associated equipment installed at a location currently wholly occupied by lawn, pavement and/or gravel," the NYSDEC does not "have any records of rare species or significant natural communities which will be of concern in relation to the proposed projects." Inasmuch as the proposed proiec~ is located on land previously disturbed, rare species or. significant natural communities will not be affected by development of the proposed undertaking. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. The proposed undertaking will not generate air pollution. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. The proposed undertaking is un-manned and will not generate ~olid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. N/A Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. N/A Policy I. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. N/A Policy 1:2. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. The proposed undertaking will be Ioc~ted in ~ commercially zoned land, thereby protecting agricultur~] Iznd. Policy 13, Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources, N/A Xcingular WIRELESS NEW ClNGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. SITE NUMBER: NYCENY1059 / L1-1059 SITE NAME: ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT metroPCS® Unlimit Yourself. CELLULAR COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT SITE NO. NY7320 ., O£1ENTBYTHESEA £ESTAUNANT DRAWING INDEX REV. T-1 TITLE SHEET 3 A-1 SITE PLAN 3 A-2 PARTIAL SITE PLAN, NOTES AND DETAILS 3 A-3 ELEVATIONS 3 DIRECTIONS: VICINITY MAP PROJECT INFORMATION ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENYIOSg / LI.~ 10~9 ~)~cingular ...~.~,~..~? .... metroposl~l ~ F-== I SITE QUALIFICATION PARTICIPANTS 2 D B D SITE PLAN ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENY1059 /Lk1059 NV7320 ~clngular,metroPCS ~ :::_-~_ ~:: PARTIAL SITE PLAN EAST ELEVATION D <~5!L ~ 'ri'mc^, uT~u~'mE.c. DETAIL @ UNDERGROUND ~: ~,~ ~.~.1 T STUB-UP CABLE SUPPORT c~x) a,~. 80~TaC"lo~ (n~):H~O~EUSE U.ISTRUrAT ALL FOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS co..~c.eNs ~.o .*s~ ~ICE BRIDGE AT OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS ~,~c' I ~.~.~J~ -I-~ r-14-1 Ingular Imetro~l~I = I----- I ' PPI ..... t""'""' I~-::= J:?: A (~TYPICAL POWER TELCO CABINET (PTC) DETAILS CABLE SUPPORT FOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS PLAN ~ EQUIPMENT CAB. ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAUNANT NYCENY1059 ! U- 1059 NY7320 (~TYPICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS 4 nc ~ ~l CINOULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, WOVEN WIRE FENCE DETAIL DETAIL @ WOVEN NCE DETAIL ~?~E~[L ~ WOVEN WIRE GATE DETAIL ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENY1059 ! U- 1059 NY7320 L ,` ~ wm~r~.~m:. ~ i~¢UDE [ .OR~. ...... ~. SEE O.AiL 2. ~ ~H~,] ~ ~g~S~_[ C~N*U ~" ANTEN Nm ~A~ L ~ ~R MOUNT AMPLIFIER MOUNTING ~A) D~AIL AL ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL B m [t-6g a.~[ SUFa~ENT LmGm OF JUM~R TO ALC~ FOR ~NG RACK ~} ~ ~ ...... ~NOKIA MAST HEAD AMPLIFER (MHA) D~AIL metroPOS SIRUCIURAL FRAMING ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENYIOS9 I IJ. 1059 NY7320 ~ ~T~.,~.A..~.DRAIL MOUNTING DETAIL HANDRAIL ELEVATION EQUIPMENT PLATFORM ~PIER DETAIL STEEL ACCESS STAIR ~ CINGL~LAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLAN PCS GPS ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENY1059 / LI- 105g NY7320 6 I 5 I ~ ?~Ec,.~!?N @ STEEL ACCESS STAIR (~ ~I.,C~L METRO PCS ANTENNA DETAIL ,-,/~z' ~ngular metro ~ ........ ~.~.. ~ .... AND ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENYI05§ / LI- 105~ NY7320 A ~ ~L SCHEDULE ~ -- '~--~ --) c 2 ~ ~.~P.~.,GROUND DAR CONNECTION DETAIL ~ST~T~N OF GROUND WIRE TO COAX CABLE GR~ND B~ EORDUIT BOND ! GROUND BUSHING DETAIL CONNECTION OF CABLE G~OUND KIT TO ANT~ CABLE ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENY1059 / U- 105g (~R~G~EFERENCE-GROUNDBARDETAIL GROUND WIRE TO GROUND BAR CONNECTION ~ A.~N~T~,~NNA CABLE GROUNDING-MONOPOLE ingular metroPCSl~ = I:::-~ ::: A EQUIPMENT GROUNDING pLAN GROUNDING KEY NOTES (~)TYP. ANTENNA GROUNDING DETAIL TYP. CABLE GROUNDING KIT DETAIL '-/ ~ ~.~P.;~ANTENNA CABLE WATERPROOFING DETAIL - I CROUND[NO NOTES; ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENY1C~i9 ILI- 1059 NY7320 A 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis, In addition, .many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the breadef concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to FK a project or action, Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site, By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes piece in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to e~aluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which wlllno~-have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a signir~:ar~ effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* The project may result one or more large important impacts may in and that have a significant impact off the environment, therefore a positive declaration ~ tm I~. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency website Date Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Public Utility Wireless Communication Services Facility Site ID# NY7320 Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY, Suffolk County Name of Applicant/Sponsor New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC & MetmPCS New York, LLC New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MetroPCS New York, LLC 333 Crossways Park Drive 5 Skyline Drive Woodbury, NY 11797 516) 677-6503 Hawthorne, NY 10532 (914) 593-8500 Name of Owner (if different) M.G.H Enterprises, Inc., attn. Mr. Bob Haase Address P.O. Box 333, Main Road City / PO Orient Point Business Telephone 631-323-2424 sm~ New Yo~ Zip Code 11957 Description of Action: Public Utility Wireless Communication Services Facility that will consist of new telecommunications equipment m gmdc level atop a new elevaled steel equipment platform and related antennas mounted inside a new 80' high RF transparent monopole. Page 2of21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial r--]Forest r--] Residential (suburban) Agriculture [] Other Wireless Telecommunications Facility r']Rural (non-farm) Total acreage of project area: 0.070 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate typo) manicured lawn and over~rown land PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0.070 acres 0 acres What is predominant soil typo(s) on project site? dredge/fill material a. Soil drainage: r'~well drained 100 % of site [] Moderately well drained __ r-]Poorly drained __% of site % of site. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see I NYCRR 370). [~lNo 4. Are there bedrock o~croppings on project site? H Yes a, What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate porcentage of proposed project site with slopes: F~0-10% 100% r-"]lO-15% Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a Historic Places? ~'] Yes r~ No is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 7, 8, What is the depth of the water table? < 10 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a pdmary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~'~ Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? r'--115% or greater % building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of OYes [~ No O No NYes [~No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identit-~l as threatened or endangered? OYes [] No Acc~din~ to: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service policy Identi~ each specie~: 12, Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project ~ite? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? r"lYes []No Describe: 13. is the project site presentiy used by tbe community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r-lYes []No r yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?. Of note, Main Road is a designated scenic byway r-lYes []No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: I Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: The project area is located with the buffer for a state~lesignated wetland located to the west. A Board of Trustees Wetland Permit Approval has been verbally issued and a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Tidal Wetland Permit is pending. b. Size (in acres): IN/A Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sul~cient capacity exist to allow connection? [] Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ON• OYes []No 18. is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and o47 I--lYes I lNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 r~Yes [~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. 1. r-]Yes r~ No Multiple Family Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dJmeesions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 0.070 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.070 acres initially; 0.070 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. I¢ the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: l/moeth (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 80 height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, ear~h, etc.) will he removed from the site? 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed n"~Yes DNo ~'~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Condominium 2' width; 2' length. Oft. __ tons/cubic yards. b, Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.070 Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? N Yes J~J No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 1 If multi-phased: b. d. Will blasting occur dudeg construction? ~ Yes ~ No Number of jobs generated: during construction 4 __ months, (including demolition) Total number of phases anticipated --, (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month __ year. (including demolition) Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month year. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~ Yes r"'] No 9. lO Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilitJes? r'"] Yes if yes, explain: I : after project is complete 0 r~No 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I I Yes I'lNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? r'-=l Yes r"] No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? N']Yes r~No Ir yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 1OO year flood plain? r~-~Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? r-'] Yes r~ No r'-lNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month? __ tons b. Ir yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [-"] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanita~ landfill? r-lYes O No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? r-]Yes ~No a, If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r-]Yes r~ No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes ~'~ No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes ~'~No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~'~ Yes N No If yes, indicate type(s) Minimal increase in electrical power (200 AMPS) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day, project involve Local, State or Federal funding? r'-] Yes ~"] No 24. Does If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board r-]Yes r~ No city, Town. Village Planning Board [~ Yes ~ No Special Exception Permit Site Plan Review Board of Trustees Wetlands Approval NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Permit FCC City, Town Zoning Board r'-lYes r~ No City, County Health Department N Yes [~ No Other Local Agencies [~-I Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies r-q Yes ~ No State Agencies r~Yes [] No Federal Agencies [~l Yes N No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? r~Yes r-"J No if Yes, indicate decision required: r-] zonieg amendment J~ Site plan r--J zoning variance J~J Special use permit J'~ New/revision of master plan r'-J Resource management plan r']Subdivision r-]other Page 8 of 21 What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? MI1 - Marine Il 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? maximum lot coverage 20% 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No Change 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~'] Yes r']No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '~ mile radius of proposed action? Existing uses at the property include the Orient by the Sea Restaurant and Bar, an 800 square foot storage building and restroom and a marina. The premises are bordered on the east by the federal government's Plum Island Animal Disease Center administrative center, which includes a ferry terminal for its employees, and on the west by the entrance gate to Orient Beach State Park, which has few improvements other than a flagpole. Residences are located across the street from the premises, running along die north side of Main Road. To the south of the premises is Gardiners Bay. Zoning Classifications: MIl R40 R-80 R-200 R-400 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of and, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the m n mum lot size proposed? [~] Yes [] NO Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes ~ No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided se~/ieas (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ~]Yes [~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? N Yes [] No Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes O yes I~'] No []No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed LO clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verir~.ation I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name MetroPCS New York, LLC 8: Date 12/15/2009 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC -- Signature environmental consultant for the applicant ! · Title EBI Consulting, Program Director- Telecommunications If the action is in the Coastal Ama, and you are a state agency, complete the C~astal Assessma~t Form befme proceeding with this Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Reslx~nsibility of lead Agency General Ioformafion (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an exper~ environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response Jn column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any spadfic project orsiteotherexamplesand/orlowerthresholdsmaybeappropdate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact ~tl occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? .o [] Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. [] [] I--lYes I--l.o Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. [] [] []Yes r~No Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] [] []Yes r~No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface, Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. [] [] r-Ir-l.o [] [] []Yes r']No Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year [] [] []Yes []No Page 11 of 21 Construction or expansion of a santary landfill Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change r-1 I--lYe~ I--I.o I--1r-lyes I'-1.o r-1 r-lye~ I-l.o Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (Le., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) Specific land forms: [] I-IY~ I-I.o Impact on Water Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) r-.-~ No ~-IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material Eom channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] I--lye~ [-'1.o [] Byes I-I.o [] OY~ I-I.o [] E]y~ I-I.o Wilt Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? r-i.o []yEs Examples that would apply to column 2 o A 10 '/o increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds I 0 acres of surface area. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] OYes ON• Page 12 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ~NO ['"]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit LJ Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not [] have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater N than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water r-] supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. [-~ Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which N presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ~ per day, Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into N an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visua~ contrast to natural conditions, Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action wilt allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mil~gated by Project Change OYes ONe []Y~ Fl.o F]Yes FFe~ Fl.o Fl~es FI.o E]~ FI.o FI~e~ NYes r~No I-1~. I'--I.e []Yes I--I.o Other impacts: [] FI C]Yes [] No Page 13 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? I-l.o I--lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: rq n rq [] []~e~ I--I.o [] []Y~ I-I.o [] I--IYe~ [].o [] I-lYes I--I.o [] [--]Yes r~No IMPACT ON AIR Will Proposed Action affect air quality? I-I.o r-]YES £xampl~ that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate o[ total contaminants will exceed § lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BIU's per hour~ Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0~ I-l.o OY~ r-l.o [] OYes •No [] •Y~ O.o [] O~as 0.o OYes ON• 8 IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANII~a, LS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I-1"o I--l~ES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. r-i i-I~ i-l.o Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a cdtical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] I-1 I-1Y~ I-I.o [] [] Ow I-%o [] [] •Ve~ I-l.o W~II Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? r-i.o []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. [] [] OYes •No [] [] I-'lY~ I-I.o Other impacts: [] [] C']Yes []No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOIJRCES 10 Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? E]"O £xamplea that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to LJ agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of [] agricultural land The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 [] acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. [] r-lY~ I-I.o [] r"~ Yes [~No [] r-F~ I-I.o Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change OYes ONo OYes ONo IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B) [].o nYEs Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that wilt result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be impar~ant to the area. [] [] [] [] Other impacts: [] [] [] [] ]Yes []No OYes F1No OYes ONo []Yes []No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAE~L RESOiJRCES Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontologic, al importance? I-I.o I-lYEs Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. [] [] [] [] [] [] F'I yes nNo nYes n.o nYe~ Fl.o Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change nYes nNo IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreat onal opportunities? [].o O~s Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: [] [] [] n n n nYes n.o I-lYes I--I.o l-lYes I--I.o IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? r-l.o nYEs List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA, Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: n n [] [] [] [] [] FI n n r-]Yes r']No r-lY~ n.o I-lyes l-lY~ I-IY~ r-l.o Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 Small to Moderate Impact 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? O"° OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Other impacts: t 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change O I--Ives [--1.o O I--Ive~ I--I.o [] I--I~es [].o IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: [] [] O O I-I~es I--IN• [] []Yes I--I.o [] DYes ~.o NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [].O []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: [] [] [] O [] [] OYes I-I.o [] OYes n.o [] OYes •No O OYes •No [] OYes •No Page 18 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can impact Be Mitigated by Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? l-l.o I-l~Es Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste Other impacts: I [] [] [] F1 [] [] [] [] r-]Yes r~No r-]Yes r-]No I-1¥~ ml,.,o I-1¥~ I--lYes I--I.o IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAC'FER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOO 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? I-I.o i-lYEs Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] F~ F~ [] [] ]Yes []No I-IY~ I-I.o r"]Yes [] No I-L~ I--I~e~ I--IY~ [].o Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change I-q [] rq~es I"q.o r-i [] F~ [-I.o I 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? [].o [-I~Es If Any Action in Part 2 is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Bdefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: ! The probability of the impact occurring ! The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value ! Whether the impact can or will be controlled ! The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from tocal needs and goals ! Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21of21 Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher Vendor Name V or Telephone Number Discount Vendor No. Vendor Address Invoice Invoice Invoice Number Date Total Payee Certification The undersigned (Claimant) (Acting on behalf&thc above named claimant) does hereby certify that thc foregoing claim is trae and correct, that no part has bcen paid, except as therein stated, that the balance therein stated is actually due and owing, and that taxes from which the Town is exempt are excluded. Net Signatute'~ ~.. Company Name Title Date Check No. Entered by Audit Date Town Clerk Purchase Order D.I l ~-~C~r~' Number Description of Goods or Services I~ -q - ?; i -co Department Certification 1 hereby certify that the materials above specified have been received by me in good condition without substitution, the services properly performed and that the quantities thereof have been verified with the exceptions Client: Southold NY Metro PCS 40200 Main Rd. Orient SCTM #1000-15-9-8.1 Invoice #:67576-004(21303) Date: 10-A ug 11-Aug 11-Aug 11-Aug 11-Aug 11-Aug Invoice The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Dr. G~enmont, NY 12077 Description (518)439-3079 prepare for meeting with Applicant and client t/4 of time attend meetings with applicant, town staff a nd town attorney 1/4 of travel time 1/4 of tolls 1/4 of meals 1/4 of mileage 121 @ $.50 per mile TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 903.36 I, Richard A. Comi, cer[ify that the above account in the amount of $ 903.36 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is actually due. 9/01/10 ~, .~, ~.~ Date Signature 9/25/2010 0.6 $ 250.00 $ t 50~00 2.4 $ 250.00 $ 600.00 $ 6.89 $ 10.97 $ 60.50 $ 78.36 $ 825.00 (Electronic Signature) Hrs Rate: Expenses. Amount 0.3 $ 250.00 $ 75.00 Vendor No. Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher ~ ~ Vendor Name Vendor Address Vendo elephone mber Ven&~r Contact - / Invoice Invoice I Invoice Number Date I Tot~ z-zooT-OO% Purchase Order Number Description of Goods or Services Check No, :mtered by Audit Date ?bwn Clerk G~nem Ledget:FUCd:and Acco~m Num~:: Net Discount Payee Certification The undersigned (Claimant) (Acting on behalf of thc above named claimant) does hereby ccrtif~ that the foregoing claim is true mid correct, that no part has been paid, except as therein stated, that the balance therein stated is actually duc and owing, and that taxes from which thc Town is exempt are excluded. Company Name ~ff~'_ ~ S Date~ Department Certification i hereby certify that the materials above specified have been received by me in good condition without substitution, the services properly performed and that the quantities thereof have been verified with the exceptions or discrcpanaics noted, and payment is approved Signature ~'/~N .~'~ Client: $outt~3~l NY ATT 11 -Aug 11 -Aug 11 -Aug 11-Aug 11-Aug Invoice (~lemme~t, NY 1 ~ (518)~3079 prepare for meefi~ ~ k~ a~ ~t 1/4 of time ~end m~n~ w~h appl~, to~ ~affand 1/4 of travel time 1/4 of tolls 1/4 of meals 1/4 of mileage 121 ~ $.50 ~r mile TOTALAMOUNTDUE$ $ 603.36 I, Richard A Comi, certify that the above account in the amount of $ 603.36 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has beer} paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is actually due. 9/01/10 ~', z'~, ~,~ Date Signature 9/25/2010 Hrs Rate: Expenses. Amount 0,3 $ 250,00 $ 75.00 0.6 $ 250.00 $ 150.00 2.4 $ 125.00 $ 300.00 $ 6.89 $ 10.97 $ 60.50 $ 7836 $ 52500 (Electronic Signature) 9/29/2006 Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher 'V~ador No. TOld D~ript~. of Payee Certification En~erod by ~[it Date ?ovm Cte~k Dep~r(~nt Certifica6on Client: Southold NY Metro PCS Invoice 40200 Male Rd. Orient $cTM #t 00O-15-9-8.t The Center fo~ Municipal Solutions Invoice #:67576~903 70 Cambridge Dr Glenmont, NY 12077 Date: Desodptlo~ (518)439-3079 7-Jul revise and distribute letter to applicant TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 300.00 I, Rioh=rd A. Coral, certify that the above ac, count in the amaunt of $ 300.00 is true and correct; that the item~, so,vices and dlabumemei3ts charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no pad has been paid or satisfied; that texee, from which the municipality Is exempt, are mot Included; end tha~ the amount claimed is actually tJue. Date Signature PAGE 15 11/24/2010 $ $ 3oO.oo (Electronic Signature) Nm Rata: Expeneee. Amount 1.2 $ 250 O0 $ 300.00 Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher Vendor No. ;hack No. htered by Audit Date Town Clerk Payee Certification l)qoartment Cer ti~ca6on Client: Sou:hold NY A3]' invoice 40200 Main Rd Orient $CTM #1000-15.9.8.I The Center for Municipal ~elution~ I~volce #:22007~004 70 Cambridge Dr Glenmont, NY 12077 Date; De~cdptlon (518)43g-307g 7-Jul revise and dtsthbute letter to applicant TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 400.00 I, Richard A Corot, certify that ~he above account ~n the amount of $ 400.00 is true and correct; that the Items, servicea and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that ne pa rt has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and Ihat the amount claimed Is aclually due. .... 8/Ol/tO ~',,~, ~ Date Signature 11/24/2010 400.00 (Ele~ronlc signature) Hre Rate: Expense~. Amount 1 8 $ 250,00 $ 400.00 uti Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher ¥~ador Nam~ iVeador No. ~ Net ~h~ck No. Ent~ed by Audit Dat~ Iowa CI~k Payee Certificafio~ ! Deparl~en{ Ce. xfificatlon TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 150.00 Invoice The Cente' for Municipal Solu~<~ns Date Signature Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher Payee Cerl2~cafion Check No, Enterod by Town DepOt Cerfificafioa Client: Southold NY ATT 40200 Main Rd. Orient Invoice #:22007-003 (21302) Invoice The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Dr. Glenmont, NY 12077 Date: Description (518)439-3079 25-Jun review letter and supplemental material from applicant 1-Jul draft response to applicant's letter as requested by client 1-Jul finalize and distribute letter TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 2,025.00 I, Richard A. Comi, certify that the above account in the amount of $ 2,025.00 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is actually due. 7/01/10 ~'. ~. ~,~ Date Signature Hrs Rate: Expenses. 1.5 $ 250.00 3.6 $ 250.00 3 $ 250.00 $ (Electronic Signature) 12/13/2010 Amount $ 375.00 $ 900.00 $ 750.00 $ 2,O25.OO PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: April 9, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached checks into a deferred account. They represent Consultant fees for a wireless application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check bate/No. Type ~; Authocization Code Wireless consultant fee 15-9-8.1 $8,500 4/3/10 - 2213 Wireless consultant fee 15-9-8.1 $ 5,000 3/16/10 - 5290 LR Atts, METROP~S NEW y~K~ LLC 5 SKYUNE DRIVE HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 3/16/2010 5290 O Town of Southold ~'5.000.00 DOU_ARS [ MEMO Technical Consultant Fee- Co-Location Portion NY7 · ~ iB "'O00OS~O," I. l, J &ODD0 J ;~ · hh ;~ METROPCS NEW YORK, LL.C Town of Southotd 3/16/2010 Technical Consultant Fee- Co-Location Portion NY73 5290 5,000.00 NY Imprest Technical Consultant Fee- Co-Location Portion 5,000.00 MEI~ROPC~ NEW YORK, I. LC Town of Southold 3/16/2010 Technical Consultant Fee- Co-Location Portion NY73 5290 5,000.00 NY Imprest Technical Consultant Fee- Co-Location Portion 5,000.00 IIIIII15 Illillllll 39287 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOAI{D OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: January 15, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached check into a deferred account. Wireless Special Exception Fee for a site plan application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & ype ATT/MetroPCS Odent by Sea Tax Map 15-9-8.1 Amount $1,000 Check Date/No. Authorization Code 8/11/09 - #4364 LR Att. PAY TO THE ORDER OF MEMO LLC Town Of Southotd ,$ One Thousand and 00/100 ............................... ** .........***** .............................................. Town of Southold *'1;000.00 METROPCS NLcW YORK, LLC Town of Southold Special Exception Application Fee NY7320 8/11/2009 4364 1,000.00 NY Imprest Special Exception Application Fee NY7320 1,000.00 METROPCS NEW YORK, LLC Town of Southold Special Exception Application Fee NY7320 8/11/2009 4364 1,000.00 NY Imprest Special Exception Application Fee NY7320 1,000,00 ; O IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII 39287 DGCR. LLC PO Box 774543, 750 Princeton Street Steamboat Springs, CO 80477 (970) 846.1066 phone FIRST NAOAL BANK OF STEAMBOAT SPRINGS STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80477 82-670/1021 5/4/2006 4476 PAY TO THE Town of Southold ~ *'2,520.00 ORDER OF Two Thousand Five Hundred Twenty and ********************************************************************************* DO,L^RS 6~ ~ Town of Southold LI-1059 ,'00 h h i: [0 ;~ i,O r= ?0 c;*: lOt, ~a nag~ Partner DGCR, LLC Town of Southold Pass-through: 5/4/2006 4478 2,520.00 First National Bank- DGC L1-1059 2,520.00 ! Preliminary Visual Impact Analysis December 2009 Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility Orient e ea Restaurant~ Prepared for: Hamlet of Orient ............ Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York New Cin§ular Wireless PCS, LLC and metroPCS New York, LLC Site NYCENY1059/LI-1059 Prepared by: Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C Hauppauge, New York Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS 'COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY .................................................... ................................ 3 LAND USES OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA ......................................... 9 VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 11 Photographic Simulations ........................................................................................................ 11 Visual impact Analysis ............................................................................................................. 13 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 16 List of Figures Figure 1 - Site Location Map ............................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 - Site Plan ................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 3 - Enlarged Cingular Equipment Plan and General Notes ............................. 6 Figure 4 - MetroPCS Enlarged Equipment Plan and Antenna Detail ......................... 7 Figure 5 - East Elevations ..................................................................................................... 8 Figure 6 - Aerial Photograph ............... ~ ............................................................................. 10 Figure 7 - Photograph Location Map ............................................................................... 12 List of Appendices Appendix A - Subject Site and Surrounding Area Photographs Appendix B - Letter of Methodology, View Point Photographs, and Photographic Simulations, Creative Visuals, Inc. Appendix C - Resume of Theresa Elkowitz, Principal, and Erin Dully Echevarria, Project Manager, VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C. Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY A Preliminary Visual Impact Analysis was performed for the proposed New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (hereinafter "Cingular') and metroPCS New York, LLC (hereinafter "metroPCS") public utility wireless communications facility (consisting of a concealment pole and ground-based equipment)_on the Orient by the Sea Restaurant property at 40200 Main Road, in the hamlet of Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). A site and axea survey and a review of aerial photography were performed to examine land uses on the site and in the strrrounding area. Photographs were taken to document the existing land uses on the site and in the surrounding area (see Appendix A). In order to conduct the preliminary visual impact analysis, the following methodology was employed: · Visual inspection of the proposed facility location and evaluation of physical characteristics of the project; · Visual inspect/on of proximate areas to determine existing characteristics of and obstructions in the horizon; and · Photographic simulation analysis of the proposed facility from several identified vantage points, conducted by Creative Visuals, Inc. Specific methodology used in the preparation of photographic simulations prepared by Creative Visuals, Inc. is Lncluded in Appendix B. 1 Introduction and Methodology Orient by the Sea Restaurant Site Location Map Street Arias USA® 2005 Data use subject to license. © 2004 DeLorrne. Street Atlas USA© 2005. www.delorme.com Scale 1: 25,000 1" = 2,083.3 ff Data Zoom 13-0 Figure 1 Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY The proposed action involves the construction of a pubhc utihty wireless communications facihty at the Orient by the Sea Restaurant property, 40200 Main Road in the hamlet of Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The subject property is currently developed with the Orient by the Sea Restaurant, a marina, and associated paved parking areas. The proposed action involves the installation of an 80-foot above grade level ("agl") concealment pole and associated equipment on the above-referenced property (see Figure 2 - Site Plan, Figure 3 - Enlarged Cingular Equipment Plan and General Notes and Figure 4 - MetroPCS Enlarged Equipment Plan and Antenna Detail). The proposed concealment pole would have the antennas of Cingular and metroPCS concealed within (see Figure 5 - East Elevations). The Cingular antennas would be concealed within at a centerline height of 77_+-feet agl and the metroPCS antennas would be concealed within at a centerline height of 57_+-feet agl. There would also be additional space within this pole for the antennas of an additional wireless service provider (see Figure 5 - East Elevations). The proposed Cingular and metroPCS ground-based equipment would be situated proximate to the base of the concealment pole. The Cingular equipment would be installed upon an elevated steel platform within a 12-foot-8-inch by 29-foot-lO-inch fenced equipment compound (see Figure 3 - Enlarged Cingular Equipment Plan and General Notes). The metroPCS equipment would be situated upon an elevated steel platform within a 12-foot by 16-foot fenced equipment compound (see Figure 4 - MetroPCS Enlarged Equipment Plan and Antenna Detail). Both equipment compounds would be surrounded with 12-foot-high chainlink fencing and landscape vegetation (14-foot-tall Juniperus virginiana). The proposed Cingular equipment cabinets would extend to a maximum height of ll-feet-2-inches agl and would be 3 Existing Site Conditions and Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility Engineering, S~rveying and Landscape Architecture, PC connected to the concealment pole via cables protected by an ice bridge that would extend to a maximum height of 12-feet agl (see Figure 5 East Elevations). The proposed metroPCS equipment cabinets would extend to a maximum height of 10- feet-5-inches and would be connected to the concealment pole via an ice bridge that would extend to a maximum height of 12-feet-6-inches agl (see Figure 5 - East Elevations). Existing Site Conditions and Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility ~ EXISTINO OVERHEAD ! UT1LITY LINES F'ROM ~ UTrL)~ POLE /~/,3S BEYOND / ~ N" ~LCO 0ONDU" ~ENCH~ P ROPER~ LINE, ~P. ~ ~5~~ 5 5 ~-/ ~ MUL~-~RI~ M~R ~K T0 N~ CORNER OF PROPE~ O~ED BY ORIENT STATION ~ ClNGU~/M~OP~ E~RIC P~ MOU~D ~ 0 ~ + ~ ~ NOTE. J NOTE: ,, ~ ~+ MAKE ALL PVC JOINTS OR OTHER COMMUNICATIONS ORIENT BY THE S~ RESTAU~NT ~ ~"~ ....... 05-6478 me[roPOS. LLC. etFoPC == AT&T~NYCENY1059 /L1-1059 ~ "~ A [ C . ] T E C T S, ~ [ P metroPCS ~ ~320 ~IRELES$, INC, -- 5 Figure 2: GENERAL NOTES: 1. EXISTING STRUCTURE, TRUE NORTH, AND MISC. INFORMATION WERE TAKEN FROM VARIOUS SOURCES OF iNFORMATION, I.E.: FIELB MEASUREMENTS, PLAN DRAWINGS SUPPLIED BY THE OWNER, PHOTOGRAPHS, INFORMATION FROM CINGULAR. THFS PLAN PROPOSED CONCREte: DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL SURVEY PERFORMED BY WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ARCHITECTS, LLP OR ANY OTHER THIRD , ~ TECHNICIANS. ' / BOATS TO BE CLEARED -- L ....... 6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAiNiNG ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION To HAVE BEE, CAUSED .¥ WORR UNDER TH,S CONTRACT. k ~~~ ~m ~- / ~ ~l~ ~ --(.~ PROPOSED C NGULAR ~I.THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL IN~TALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS I ~ ~~ ~ ~ / ~ ~/ CONC~ MO~PO~ DAMAGED P~T S~LL BE REPAIRED At SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. MOU~D O" PROPPED f . 21~11" 7'--~ ~f~ --~ X~ . ~ P,ERS ~OUND OR "~R UTLTES SUBCONT~CTOR SHALL PRO. DE SAF~ T~.ING FOR THE WORKI.~ CREW THS WLL PROPOS~ CNGU~ 12'-0' ~ ~ 5~ x ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~'~ ~ /] . ~ I ~ THE OWNER ~D/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. . ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢~*/ ~ ~/ %~O~' m6.SUBCONT~CTOR S~LL MmNiMmZE DmSTUR~NCE TO EXmSTING SmTE 0URiNG CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL M~SURES. mF k~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ / ' j ~ ~~ CONTROL. ~.~ m '" m~ ~iU~=~-- ~/ . ~r ~ ,..THE SU.CONT.ACTOR S.ALL PROV,D~ SITE S,~.~g ,. ACCOROA.CE WIT. CN~U~. PROdECT TECHNCAE SPECFC~TiON FOR x r. ~~ ................ ~x~x~ ~// / ~ SHUBB~ ~D LOW L~NG a ~ c. z T ~ c * s. ~ ~ ~ metroPCS ~ N~320 ~RELESS, IN~- EN~RGED CINGU~R EQUIPMENT P~N ~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~:~ 24897 NY7320 SP-2 6 Figure 3 PROPOSED ClNGULAR/METROPCS ELECTRIC CONDUFI~ ]RENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM __ PROPOSED MULTI-CARRIER METER BANK TO PROPOSED CINGUL~/METROPCS ELECTRIC PANELS MOUNTED ON THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPOSED ELEVATED EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS -- PROPOSED METROPCS ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE RF COMPA3]BLE CONCE~MENT MONOPOLE. 1 ANTENNA pER SECTOR. TYP. ~ 14'_0~ Go PARTIAL SITE PLAN PROPOSED ME'IROPCS -- DASHED UNES REPRESENT EXISTING WOODEN RETAINING WALL TO SE REMOVED IN EN3~RETY · DASHED ENES REPRESEN~ EXISTING SHRUBBERY AND LOW LYING VEGETATION TO BE REMOVED ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT AT&T # NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 metroPCS # NY7320 40200 MAIN RD ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 PROPOSED METROPCS PTC CABINET MOUNTED TO PROPOSEE :31EP-L PLATFORM HANDRAIL PROPOSED GALVANIZED S3EEL PROPOSED METROPCS EQUIPMENT CABINETS blOUN~ED ON PROPOSED ELEVATED GALVANIZED STEEL PLATFORM. ~¢p. PROPOSED TELCO CONDUIT TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM ~ EYJ~ONG U~L~Y POLE ~35 TO PROPOSED MESA SPAN CABINET '~/AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTf PROPOSED 14'~0' HIGH JUNIPERUS ~flRGINIANA O 7'-0' O.C.. TYP. OF (40) PROPOSED MEIROPCS 12'--0' HIGH CHNNUNK FENCE WRH 4'-0' LOCK. ABLE GATE INOTE: ] ANTENNA MOUNT MFG.; KATHREIN PART N.O.: INCLUDED NEW CINQULAR ~RELESS PCS, LLC 333 CROSSWAYS PARK DRIVE WOODBURY, NEW YORK 11797 at&t 4 ANTENNA MFG: KATHREIN PART N~.: 800-10121 UMTS TYPICAL CINGULAR ANTENNA DETAIL IANTENNA -MFG: KATHREIN-WERKE KG -PART NO.: BOO ~[o 5/16~ SIDE TYPICAL METROPCS ANTENNA DETAIL 6-3/32" TOP VIEW IFOR GENERAL NOTE~ SEE SHT. SP--2. PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PLATI--ORM HANDRNL --A-~A ANTENNA CABLE --T--T TELCO CONDUIT ~--E ELECTRIC CONDUIT --T/E--T/E-- TELCO & ELECTRIC CONDUIT DRAWING DEPICTS THE INSTALLATION OF NEW ANTENNAS, GABUNO ETC. 3HAT ARE TO BE MOUNTED W~IN THE NEW RF COMPA~BLE MONOPOLE S~RUCTURE. A CONCRETE FOUNDATION TO BE DESIGNED BY A NEW YORK STATE UCENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. SIGNED AND SEALI~ DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE FILED BY OTHERS. IF THIS SHEET IS 11" X 17' REFER TO ADJACENT GRN=HIC SCALE. IL vs--,,-o- ~" ~ "" ~--~NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC c~ ~ ~ ~05~478 J metroPCS, LLC. ~ ~ ~ M~ROPCS EN~RGED EQUIPMENT P~N 2 ~.-~,~.o~] - .~ ~ ~ ~ 3' ~E 7 Figure 4 A D C ~ "~ T.O. NEW E~q'ENDABLE '(3) NEW METROPCS ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE ~ (3) NEW CJNGULAR ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE / ~ MONOPOLE A ~ RF COMPA~BLE CONCEALMENT k~ONOPOLZ,~ / ' '/"2~ D RAD. CNTR~ OF , · · ~- T- --NEW CINGULAR DPS ANTENNA. " .EW c,.~um c~,~ ~ ~cE - --.~w ~mo.cs ~Tc ~ / r - .EW umo~cs L~EO ~ To / / I ORIENT BY THE S~ RESTAU~NT ~ ~"~ ....... ~c~'NEW me[roPCS, LLC.  AT&T~NYCENY1059 /L1-1059 ~ -~ A R C R ~ T g C T S, ~ g P metroPCS ~ N~320 WlRELESS~ IHC, ~ "~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ s~ ~ ~ [~ ~ ~ 24~97I NYCENY1059 8 Figure 5 Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, PC LAND USES OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA As previously indicated, the subject property is currently developed with the Orient by the Sea Restaurant, a marina and associated paved parking areas. Below is a brief description of the land uses surrounding the subject property. In order to depict the nature of the surrounding community, photographs are included in Appendix A. North: Immediately north of the subject property are single-family residential properties. South: South of the subject property are the waters associated with Gardner's Bay. East: To the east of the subject property is property associated with Plum Island Animal Disease Center and the Cross Sound Ferry Terminal, with undeveloped lands beyond. West: West of the subject property is Long Beach State Park with single-family residential uses beyond. The proposed facility is located within an area in which Cingular and metroPCS currently have service deficiency gaps, according to information provided by the applicants. The area in which the facility must be placed is characterized with a mix of uses (see Figure 6 - Aerial Photograph). Given the predominance of residential uses to the north and west, there are limited siting opportunities for a facility such as that proposed. However, the applicant has incorporated mitigation measures into the facility design to minimize potential visual impacts upon the subject property and the surrounding area. Given this, the construction of the proposed public utility wireless communications facility on a commercial use property within a mixed use area is appropriate, as it would obviate the need to erect multiple tall structures (i.e., monopoles) to accommodate the antennas of each individual service provider. Existing Site Conditions and Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility Littl~ 8 GPS Engineering, Survo,ing and Landscape Architectum, P.C. VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Photographic Simulations Creative Visuals, Inc. prepared photorealistic simulations of the proposed public utility wireless communications facility. On May 29, 2007, Creative Visuals, Inc. conducted an on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the proposed facility location and surrounding area. Digital and analog photographs were taken from each of the View Points being examined between 7:15 a.m. and 11:30 p.m. The conditions were variable (cloudy to sunny skies). These photographs presented a reference point for calculation of proposed 80-foot agl concealment pole, using red flags attached to a crane, as seen from each View Point (where visible) (see Creative Visuals Methodology Letter in Appendix B for further detail). Fourteen off-site View Points proximate to the proposed facility location were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact of the completed project. Photographic simulations of the proposed facility were prepared from the locations where the facility would be visible. A Photograph Location Map depicting the View Points is included as Figure 7 - Photograph Location Map. Photographs were taken from each of the examined View Points using a 50mm lens. The photographs were taken as digital high-resolution files and using print film. A laser rangefinder and a hand-held GPS unit were utilized to collect data in the field. These data were then used in combination with 3D software to create a model of the actual proposed facility using dimensions and drawings furnished by William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP, the applicant's consulting architects. Other software was then used to photo-realistically simulate the facility as seen from each View Point, maintaining the perspective of the digital and analog photos. Finally, the simulated facility was inserted and merged into the digitized site photographs. Complete methodology for the photographic simulations is included in Appendix B. 11 Visual Impact Analysis Engineering, SurvO,ing and Landscape Architecture, P.C. Visual Impact Analysis The results of the visual impact analysis are summarized below with simulations included in Appendix B. View point A - from the intersection of Uhl Lane and Three Waters Lane, 1,895+_- feet north of the subject site. The view point A existing conditions photograph depicts a residential neighborhood with dense seasonal vegetation. The crane was not visible from this location. Thus, as the proposed facility would not be visible from this location, a photographic simulation was not prepared. View point B - from adjacent to the beach parking area at the end of Lands End Lane, 2,930_+-feet north of the subject site. The view point B existing conditions photograph depicts a paved roadway lined with dense seasonal vegetation. The crane was not visible from this location. Thus, as the proposed facility wguld not be visible from this location, a photographic simulation was not prepared. View point C - from near 965 Ryder Farm Lane and the intersection of Ryder Farm Lane and Uhl Lane, 2,379+_-feet northwest of the subject site. The view point C existing conditions photograph depicts a paved roadway lined with dense seasonal vegetation. The crane was not visible from this location. Thus, as the proposed facility would not be visible from this location, a photographic simulation was not prepared. View point D - from the intersection of Ryder Farm Lane and Route 25, 1,657_+-feet northwest of the subject site. The view point D existing conditions photograph depicts a paved roadway, a residential property, a utility pole, overhead wires and dense seasonal vegetation. The crane was not visible from this location. Thus, as the proposed facility would not be visible from this location, a photographic simulation was not prepared. 13 Visual Impact Analysis Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, PC View point E - from near 1410 Cedar Birch Lane, 1,038±-feet southwest of the subject site. From view point E, the existing conditions photograph depicts grassy area surrounded with wetlands vegetation and seasonal vegetation. From this location, the proposed pole would be visible. However, the proposed antennas would be concealed w~fftin, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. View point F - from near the entrance to the "Cross Sound Ferry," 1,183+-feet northeast of the subject site. From view point F, the existing conditions photograph depicts paved staging areas associated with the "Cross Sound Ferry," with the subject property beyond. From this location, the proposed pole would be visible. However, the proposed antennas would be concealed within, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. Additionally, the ground based equipment compounds would be partially screened behind landscape vegetation, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. View point G - from Lands End Lane, 1,212±~feet north of the subject site. From view point G, the existing conditions photograph depicts utility poles, overhead wi~es, a flagpole, seasonal vegetation and structures associated with the operations of the Plum Island Animal Disease Center. From this location, the proposed pole would be visible. However, the proposed antennas would be concealed within, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. Moreover, from this location the proposed facility would not appear any taller in the horizon than the existing utility poles and flagpole, and would be visually similar to same. View point H - from Park View Lane, near the intersection with Plum Island Lane, 1,342±-feet northwest of the subject site. From view point H, the existing conditions photograph depicts a field with seasonal and evergreen vegetation, utility poles and overhead wires beyond. From this location, the proposed pole would be largely obscured by the evergreen vegetation. As such, the overall incremental visual impact from this view point would not be significant. View point I - from the entrance to "Orient Beach State Park," 820±-feet north of the subject site. From view point I, the existing conditions photograph depicts the entrance to "Orient Beach State Park," with the subject property beyond. From this location, the proposed pole would be visible. However, the proposed antennas would be concealed within, and the ground based equipment compounds would be screened behind landscape vegetation, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. 14 Visual Impact Analysis Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C View point J - from "Orient Beach State Park," 625±-feet south of the subject site. From view point J, the existing conditions photograph depicts the roadway associated with "Orient Beach State Park," with surrounding vegetation and the subject property beyond. From this location, the proposed pole would be visible. However, the proposed antennas would be concealed within, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. View point K- from "Gardiners Bay," 2,750_+-feet southeast of the subject site. From view point K, the existing conditions photograph depicts the subject property and the shoreline on either side thereof, as viewed from the bay. From this location, the proposed pole would be visible. However, the proposed antennas would be concealed within, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. Additionally, the proposed equipment compounds would be screened by landscape vegetation. View point L - from "Gardiners Bay," 1,040±-feet southeast of the subject site. From view point L, the existing conditions photograph depicts the subject property and the shoreline on either side thereof, as viewed from the bay. From this location, the proposed pole would be visible. However, the proposed antennas would be concealed within, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. Additionally, the proposed equipment compounds would be screened by landscape vegetation. As the visual analysis indicates, the proposed facility would be visible from several locations. However, the proposed antennas would be concealed within the proposed concealment pole, and the ground-based equipment would be screened by landscape vegetation, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. 15 Visual Impact Analysis Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C CONCLUSION From a planning perspective and given the mixed-use character of the area in which the applicants must situate the facility to address service deficiencies, Cingular and metroPCS have chosen a commercial-use property, which is appropriate as there are limited choices in the immediate area. The applicants have also designed the facility as a concealment pole that can accommodate the antennas of multiple wireless service providers within the structure. This helps to limit the potential development of multiple poles within the same area. Finally, the proposed facility, a concealment pole with screened ground-based equipment, is designed such that visual impacts have been mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. s~w~os~ 16 Conclusion Appendix A {~[ Engineering, Surt~eying and Lttnd$cape Architectstre, Photog. L~ph No. 1: View of the proposed public utility wireless communications facility location on the southern portion of the subject property. Photograph No. 2: View of the buildings, marina use and paved parking areas on the overall subject property. Photo~h No. 3: View looking north at the buildings on the subject site from the proposed communications fhcility location. Photo~ph No. 4: View looking east at the boat ramp and marina from the proposed communications facility location. Photograph No. 5: View looking south towers Gardiners Bay from the proposed communications facility location. Photograph No. 6: View looking west toward Orient Beach State Park from the proposed communications fhcitity location. PhotogLg. ph No. 7: Representative view of residences north of the subject property along Lands End Road. Photo rgLajph No. 8: View of the Plum Island Ferry Station (associated with the Plum Island Animal Disease Center) on Main Road, east of the subject property. Photograph No. 9: View of Gardiners Bay, south of the subject property. Photograph No. 10: Representative view of residences on Cedar Birch Road, west of the subject property. .[:',28070 00 Orient by the Sea,docs',VARIOUS',,Photograph t~og.doc Appendix B Creative Visuals, Inc. 37 Happy Valley Road Post Office Box 435 Bears~ille, New York 12409 Phone (845) 679-9055 email:cvisuals~aol.com December 9, 2009 , William F. Collins, AIA 12-1 Technology Drive Setauket, NY 11733 RE: Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility To Whom It May Concern: The following is a description of the methodology used in preparing the visual analysis study and photo realistic renderings of a post-construction, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and MetroPCS proposed public utility wireless telecommurdcations facility ("Facility") located at 40200 Main Road, Orient Point, New York. The proposed Facility will consist of an 80'AGL (Above Ground Level) tall stealth monopole, ground equipment and landscaping as depicted on the site plans dated December 17, 2009 and prepared by William F. Collins AIA, the applicant's consultants. Creative Visuals, Inc. has prepared a visual analysis study of the proposed equipment utilizing the process described below. A two-man team made an on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the terrain and its surrounding area. Twelve view points within close proximity of the site were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact, from which eight were selected for photo representation of the completed monopole. The following view points are presented for analysis: Description of View Point Approximate Distance to Site View point A - from the intersection of Uhl Lane and Three Waters Lane, crane not visible; 1,895' View point B - from adjacent to the beach parking area at the end of Lands End Lane, crane not visible; 2,930' View point C - from near 965 Ryder Farm Lane and the intersection of Ryder Farm Lane and Uhl Lane, crane not visible; 2,379' View point D - from the intersection of Ryder Farm Lane and Route 25, crane not visible; 1,657' View point E - from near 1410 Cedar Birch Lane; 1,038' View point F - from near the entrance to the "Cross Sound Ferry"; 1,183' View point G - from Lands End Lane; 1,212' View point H - from Park View Lane, near the intersection with Plum Island Lane; 1,342~ View point I - from the entrance to "Orient Beach State Park"; 820' View point J from "Orient Beach State Park"; 625' View point K from "Gardiners Bay"; 2,750' View point L from "Gardiners Bay". 1,040' Larry Heimel took photographs of the site from each of the view points under study using a Canon EOS 5D digital camera and a Nikon F5 analog camera shooting Fuji Professional print film, both using a 50mm lens. Two cameras were used to provide an "insurance" shot. The fieldwork was done on May 29, 2007 between 7:15 and 11:30 A.M.; conditions were sunny skies. These photos presented a reference point for calculation of the structure's placement, using red flags attached to a crane. The flags were set at 100' above the location of the proposed site, which represents the top of the stealth flagpole. Computer modeling took into account the difference in_ ~height. Prior to the crane test, the pole site and compound comers were staked by a representative of William F. Collins, AIA. Three 12' telescopic poles with refiective material attached and a traffic cone were set at the ~taked compound comers as references for the compound. A 3D model of the proposed pole was generated using the dimensions supplied by the applicant. 3D software photorealistically rendered the proposed pole as seen from each of the photo simulation view points, maintaining the perspective ora 50mm lens. This resulted by utilizing data taken in the field by a laser mngefinder and a hand-held gps (global positioning system) unit. The 3D software used this information to reference the Facility and view point locations, thus maintaining their relative X, Y and Z distances (the difference in elevation, bearing and distance to). The Facility was generated with its actual dimensions as a vectorized 3D model. Each view point including the site was elevated to its relative AMSL (Above Mean Sea Level). The 3D program cameras were set at each view point's X, Y and Z location and photographed the model with a 50mm lens (correlating to our analog 50mm photos). The X, Y and Z coordinates allowed the 3D camera to render the Facility to its correct scale, rotation and angle from each view point. The Facility was assigned "photorealistic" materials in the 3D sol, ware. 3D software simulated sunlight on the 3D model, taking into account the site latitude, date and time of day of the view point photographs. Actual landscape trees were overlaid onto the 3D model trees to facilitate photo [ealisn~ Adobe Photoshop software was used in the process of overlaying the 3D model onto the corresponding visible references used during photography. The crane was digitally removed from the view point photographs. The photorealistically-rendered 3D model was inserted and merged into the digitized site photos. Conclusion Based upon our over fourteen years' experience in visual analysis, as well as analyzing over 900 public utility structure sites throughout the region, we are confident that the enclosed visual study reasonably refiects the appearance of the Facility, at the captioned site. \ Point Orient Beed~: View point A .~ from the intersection of Uhl Lane and Three Waters Lane, crane not visible Photo by Creative Visuals Inc. View oo~n[ B - from adjacent to the beach parking area at the end of Lands End Lane, crane not visible Photo by Creative Visuals, inc. View point C - from near 965 Ryder Farm Lane and the intersection of Ryder Farm Lane and Uht Lane, crane not visible Photo by Creative Visuals, !nc. View point D -- from the intersection of Ryder Farm Lane and Route 25, crane not visible Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. Existing view View point E ~ from near '~4't0 Cedar Birch Lane Phofo by Creafive Visuals, Inc. View point E -from near 1410 Cedar Birch Lane Computer simulated photo by Creative VisL~ais, lnc, Existing view View point F -from near the entrance to the "Cross Sound Ferry" Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc, View point F -from near the entrance to the "Cross Sound Ferry" * 1 Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, lnc, Existing view View point G - from Lands End Lane Photo by Creative Visuals, thC, View point G - from Lands End Lane Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Existing view View point H - from Park View Lane, near the intersection with Plum Island Lane Photo by Creative Visuals, lnc~ View point H -, from Park View Lane, near the intersection with Plum Island Lane Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. Existing view View point t ~ from the entrance to "Orient Beach State Park" Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc, View point 1 ~ from the entrance to "'Orient Beach State Park" Computer simulated photo by Creative VisuaJs, Ir'~c, Existing view View point J - from "Orient Beach State Park" Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc, View point K ,~ frem ~'Gardiners Bay", approx[matdy 2,750' from the proposed pole Photo by Creative Visuals, ~nc. View point K ~. from "Gardiners Bay'~, approximately 2~750' from 'the proposed pole Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Existing view ~ Ba,~ View point L from "Gardiners y, approximately ,040' from the proposed pole Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. Ba ~ View point L ~ from "Gardiners y, approximately 1,040' from the proposed pole Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. Appendix C ~} Engineering, Sttrt~gqng and lxmdscttpe Architectt~re, PC.. Transportation Land Development Environmental Services VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, RC. I Affiliated with Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Theresa Elkowitz Principal Theresa Elkowitz is a Principal of VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C. ('VHB'), an engineering, surveying, and environmental consulting firm. Ms. Elkowitz has over two decades of experience in environmental and planning consulting. She is well-versed in the State Environmental Quality Review Act ('SEQKA') process and has prepared numerous Environmental Assessment Forms ("EAFs'); Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements ('DEISs' and "FEISs"); planning and zoning studies, visual assessments; environmental assessments and associated evaluations. Not only has she worked with public and private clients on the administration of the SEQRA, but she also served as a member of the Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality ("CEQ') and the Suffolk County Historic Trust between 1990 and 2006, and was CEQ Chairperson for approximately fifteen years. The CEQ is responsible for recommending SEQRA determinations, holding public hearings and administration of the environmental review process for actions proposed by the County of Suffolk. She also serves as a member of the Village of Belle Terre Planning Board. Ms. Elkowitz provides expert testimony and affidavits to various Town and Village Boards, Planning Boards and Zoning Boards of Appeals on planning, zoning and environmental matters and has provided testimony and affidavits in court cases. Ms. Elkowitz has also served as Municipal Planner and/or provided consulting planning and/or environmental services to the Incorporated Villages of Lake Success, Great Neck Estates, Old Brookville, Brookville and Sands Point and the Town of Babylon and City of Glen Cove. In addition, to ensure compliance with SEQRA, Ms. Elkowitz provides environmental consulting services to various school districts including, but not limited to: Cold Spring Harbor, East Quogue, Half Hollow Hills, Jericho, Lindenhurst, Three Village, Plainview- Old Bethpage, Rocky Point, East Williston, Eastport-South Manor, Westhampton Beach, Harborfields, Patchogue-Medford, Port Washington, East Moriches, Smithtown, Bay Shore, Kings Park, Cornmack, Oyster Bay-East Norwich, Bellmore-Merrick, Seaford and Wantagh and to various public libraries including, but not limited to: Manhasset, East Islip and Hauppauge. Ms. Elkowitz has also lectured on SEQRA and its implementing regulations as well as on various planning and municipal land use matters. Some of her recent lectures include those to Lorman Educational Services, the Eastern Suffolk BOCES School Business Officials, Suffolk County Legislature, Touro College Department of Continuing Legal Education, New York State Conference of School Superintendents, Local Government Officials Seminar, City of Glen Cove Mayor's Staff Seminar, New York State Conference on the Environment, Suffolk Academy of Law Land Use Conference and New York State Bar Association Municipal Land Use Controls Seminar. 2150 Joshua's Path, Suite 300 Hauppauge, New York 11788 631.234,3444 · FAX 631.234.3477 email: info@vhb.com www. vhb.com Continued, p. 2 Prior to joining VHB,~ Ms. Elkowitz was the founding Principal of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc., a multi-faceted environmental and planning consulting firm. Prior to that, Ms. Elkowitz spent several years managing environmental projects for a consulting engineering firm. She has been involved in many diverse projects including the preparation of DEISs and FEISs, Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, wetland evaluations, water use and conservation plans, municipal and private planning studies, grant applications, as well as solid waste management plans and Part 360 permit applications. Before entering the field of environmental and planning consulting, Ms. Elkowitz was employed by the Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs. She was responsible for preparing environmental assessments for community development projects in accordance with SEQRA and the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA'). PROJECT EXPERIENCE Representative projects/documents which Ms. Elkowitz has supervised, prepared and/or had a significant preparatory role include, but are not limited to: Heartland Town Square ElS, Islip, NY - EIS for the rezoning and redevelopment of the 475-acre former Pilgrim Psychiatric Center, as "Hea~rtland Town Square," a Smart Growth Community in the Town of Islip. Old Plainvlew ElS, Oyster Bay, NY - EIS for the redevelopment of a 169-acre property into Old Plainview, a Mixed-Use, Smart-Growth Community in the Town of Oyster Bay. Lighthouse SEQRA Documentation, Nassau County, NY - SEQRA documentation for the Redevelopment of the Nassau County Veterans Memorial Coliseum Property, "The ' Lighthouse," as mixed-use development. Walt Whitman Mall, Smith Haven Mall, Roosevelt Field Mall, and Avis Property ElSs and EAFs, Nassau and Suffolk County - EISs and EAFs for the modifications, alterations and expansions to Walt Whitman Mai1, Smith Haven Mall, Roosevelt Field Mall, and the redevelopment of the Avis Property in both Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Slsepy's EAF, Oyster, Bay - Expanded EAF for the Sleepy's Inc. Headquarters in the Town of Oyster Bay. The Seasons Developments EAFs, Oyster Bay, NY - Expanded E~Fs for multi- family/next-generation residential developments, "The Seasons at'Massapequa" and "The Seasons at Bethpage.' ~ The operations of Preudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. were acquired by VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C. as of January 1, 2009. · Continued, p. 3 Cemetery ElS, 0Id Westbury, NY - ElS for the creation of a new Catholic cemetery and residential subdivision. Lowe's EISs/EAFs, Multiple Locations, NY - EISs/EAFs for several Lowe's Home Centers in the Towns of Oyster Bay, Hempstead, Islip, and Brookhaven. Stop & Shop EISs, Oyster Bay and Southampton, NY - EIS for several Stop & Shop Supermarkets. Kensico Water Pollution Control Program SEQRA/CEQR Documentaion - DEIS and related SEQRA/CEQR Documentation for Kensico Water Pollution Control Program for New York City Department of Environmental Protection. Freshkills Landfill SEQRA/CEQR Documentaion - DEIS and related SEQRA/CEQR Docrunentation for Fresh Kills Landfill for New York City Department of Sanitation. Various School Districts - EAFs, DEISs, Determinations of Significance and SEQRA Notices. Nassau Property DEIS, Nassau County - DEIS for Rezoning of 147+ acre Nassau Cormty Property for Nassau County. Roosevelt Raceway DEIS/FEIS, Westbury, NY - DEIS and FEIS for Rezoning of 170+ acre Roosevelt Raceway for property owner. Commercial Center DEIS/FEIS, Stony Brook, NY - DEIS and FEIS for development of 22+ acre commercial center for private applicant. Public Utility Communications Facilities and other Wireless Carriers - Various Planning, Zoning, Environmental and Visual Assessments. LWRP for Man0rhaven, Manorhaven, NY - LW-RP and environmental and planning tasks for Incorporated Village of Manorhaven. Retirement Community DEIS/FEIS, Amityville, NY - DEIS and FEIS for 200+ unit Planned Retirement Community for private applicant. incentive Zoning District DGEIS, Goshen, NY - DGEIS for creation of Incentive Zoning District for the Town of Goshen. Subdivision DEIS/FEIS, Kings Point, NY - DEIS and FEIS for 23+ acre subdivision private applicant, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) wetland applications and presentations at public hearings. Continued, p. 4 Commercial Development DEIS/FEIS, Woodmere, NY - DEIS and FEIS for a commercial building in Woodmere, securing a NYSDEC and USACE wetland permits, presentations at public hearings. Recycling Facility EAF, Brookhaven, NY - Preparation of an EAF and environmental report for a proposed solid waste management recycling facility in Brookhaven. Residential Development EAF, Rrookhaven, NY - EAF and Environmental Report for a 40- unit residential development in Coram, Town of Brookhaven. Commercial Development DEIS/FEIS, Riverhead, NY - DEIS and FEIS for residential and commercial development in Riverhead, securing a NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland Permit. Waterfront Condominium Complex in Freepo~l - DEIS and FEIS, expert testimony on wetlands and representation of client before Freeport Planning Board, preparation of NYSDEC and USACE Wetland Applications. Corporate Park in Holbrook, Town of Brookhaven - DEIS and FEIS and preparation of economic analysis report for proposed corporate park. 80-unit Residential Condominium Complex in Coram, Town of Brookhaven - DEIS and FEIS preparation. Water Use and Conservation Study for Marriott Hotel Expansion, Uniondale - DEIS and detailed expert testimony associated with SEQRA process. Subdivision in Reekman/East Fishkill - DEIS and FEIS for residential subdivision, and expert testimony associated with SEQKA process. Office Condominium Complex in Wantagh - DE1S and FEIS, expert testimony associated with SEQRA process, preparation of NYSDEC freshwater wetland perrrdt application. Shopping Center in Patchogue - DEIS and FEIS, and expert testimony associated with SEQRA process. Professional Positions Principal. Responsible for management, in the New York office, of environmental and planning operations of a multi- disciplined engineering, surveying, land development and enviroraTtental consulting firm. Management of the preparation of envirom'aental impact statements; environmental assessment forms; site assessments; waterfront revitalization programs; wetland evaluations; planning studies; and various permit applications and related analyses for public and private clients. Continued, p. 5 Environmental presentations and expert testimony before various municipal boards, community groups and courts. Administrative tasks include all business operations, personnel management, budgeting, billing, marketing, etc. VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C, 1757-24 Veterans Memorial Highway, Islandia, New York. January, 2009 - Present. Principal and Corporate President. Responsible for operations of a multi-disciplined environmental and planning consulting firm. Technical tasks include the preparation of environmental impact statements; environmental assessment forms; site assessments; waterfront revitalization programs; wetland evaluations; planning studies; and various permit applications and related analyses for public and private clients. Environmental presentations and expert testimony before various municipal boards and community groups. Administrative tasks include all business operations, personnel management, budgeting, billing, marketing, etc. Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc., 1757-24 Veterans Memorial Highway, Islandia, New York. August, 1988 - December, 2008. Environmental Project Manager/Planner. Responsible for the preparation of environmental impact statements, environment assessments and planning studies for private clients and municipalities. Environmental presentations and testimony to Town Boards and Planning Boards. Preparation of various NYSDEC, USACE, Nassau County Department of Health and Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit applications. Coordination of SEQRA procedures. Site evaluations and environmental assessments for real estate developers. Administrative functions including proposal and contract preparation, budget analysis, and billing. Supervision of professional and support staff. Baldwin & Cornelius, P.C., 210 Express Street, Plainview, New York. December, 1986 -August, 1988. Neighborhood Aide/Assistant to the Housing Rehabilitation Administrator. Completion of environmental reviews for all Community Development projects in accordance with SEQRA and NEPA. Preparation of grant proposals. Assisted in the first affordable housing program for the Town of Brookhaven - the Neighborhood Homes Program. Credit feasibility analyses for SONYMA mortgage applicants. Continued, p. 6 Interviewing for residential rehabilitation, materials grant and townwide handicap ramp programs, evaluation of applications and subsequent loan recommendations. Monitoring and coordinating of the Materials Grant and Townwide Handicap Ramp programs, monitoring of loan repayments and analysis of project income. Solicitation of consultants and engineers for public works projects. Coordination of public works projects and contract compliance with federal regulations. Preparation of budgets and recommendations for policy changes. Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs, 3233 Route 112, Medford, New York. November, 1983 -November, 1986. Instructor. Preparation of and teaching biweekly recitations in algebra and introductory microeconomics, private tutorials, assigning and grading homework and examinations. Association for Public Policy and Management Summer Institute for Minority Students, W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York. Summer, 1983, 1984 and 1985. Eduction Special Projects Honors, Awards and Designations MS, Policy Analysis and Public Management, W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management, 1985 BA, Liberal Arts, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1985 Consultant. Rasponsihle for the formulation, implementation and administration of the Residential Rehabilitation Program for the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove. Tasks include interviewing clients, evaluating applications, program coordination, project monitoring and payments. Fall, 1985 -1987. Ce~fied Environmental Specialist and Certified Environmental Inspector, Environmental Assessment Association, 1994. Magna Cum Laude Graduate, State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. Winner, Presidential Management Intern Program. Spring, 1985. Affiliations/ Planning Board, Incorporated Village of Belle Terre Continued, p. 7 Memberships Board of Directors, YMCA Board of Directors, Long Island Brfilders Instihate Transportation Land Development Environmental Services VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C. J Affiliated with Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Erin E. Duffy Echevarria Project Manager Ms. Echevarria's responsibilities involve the coordination of project activities associated with public utility wireless communications facilities, including attendance at hearings, preparation of Planning, Zoning and Visual Impact Analyses and preparation of State Enviroru:nental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation. In addition, Ms. Duffy's duties ~lso include performing ecological site surveys and participating in the preparation of various environmental and planning docrm~tents, including, but not limited to, environmental assessment forms (EAFs), zoning studies, visual studies, wetlands applications and enviromnental impact statements (EISs). PROJECT EXPERIENCE Planning and Zoning Analyses and Neighborhood Character Studies, Various Sites, NY Preparation of planning and zoning analyses and neighborhood character studies for public utility wireless communications facilities in the Village of Roslyn Estates, Village of Freeport, Town of Oyster Bay, Town of Brookhaven, Town of Huntington, Town of Riverhead, Town of Islip, and the Town of Hempstead. Ms. Echevarria is a Project Manager with VHB. She recently became part of VHB as a result of the merger between Eschbacher VHB and Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, inc. (FECG). Ms. Echevarria's primary tasks involve providing SEQRA and NEPA support to the public utilities industry. NEPA Reports, Various Sites, NY Compilation of information and preparation of NEPA reports for proposed public utility cormmunications facilities throughout Long Island and in the five boroughs; Mixed-Use Development, Oyster Bay, NY Ecological investigation and impact assessment, as well as participation in the preparation of the EIS for a Planned Development District with a mix of residential units, commercial space, and recreational areas. Retail Development, Oyster Bay, NY Ecological investigation and impact assessment, as well as participation in the preparation of the EIS, of a 12.78-acre light industrial property for proposed retail establishment in the hamlet of Hicksville. Residential Development, Oyster Bay, NY Ecological investigation and impact assessment, as well as participation in the preparation of the EIS, of a 5.03-acre commercial property for proposed development of a multi-family residential development in the hamlet of Oyster Bay. Residential Subdivision, Oyster Bay and North Hempstead, NY Ecological investigation and impact assessment, as well as participation in the preparation of the EIS, of a 97.3-acre residentially-zoned property for proposed a residential subdivision and cemetery in the Village of Old Westbury. 2150 Joshua's Path, Suite 300 Hauppauge, New York 11788 631.234.:~.~?. · FAX 631.234.3477 email: info@vhb corn ~ww. vhb.com Erin E. Duffy Echevarria Continued, p. 2 Healthcare Facility, Islip, NY Ecological investigation for a health care property. Neighborhood Character and EnvirOnmental Assessment, Various Sites, NY Neighborhood character and environmental assessment for variance applications in the Towns of lslip, Brookhaven, and Huntington. Neighborhood Character and Environmental Assessment, Brookhaven, NY Neighborhood character and environmental assessment for special permit applications. Planned Development District, Islip, NY Ecological impact assessment as well as participation in preparation of the EIS of a 78.8±-acre property for a proposed Planned Development District with a mix of residential units, commercial space and recreational areas in hamlet of Great River. Site Investigation, Southampton, NY Ecological investigation for religious property. Expanded EAFs, Various Sites, NY Preparation of Expanded EAFs for properties in the Incorporated Villages of Southampton, Sag Harbor, Greenport, and Patchogue and the Town of Brookhaven. NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Permit Applications, Various Sites, NY Preparation of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Freshwater Wetlands Permit Applications for properties within the Town of Huntington, Village of East Hampton, and the Village of Southampton; and NYSDEC Tida~ Wetlands Permit Applications, Various Sites, NY Preparation of NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Permit Applications within the Towns of Hempstead, Babylon, Brookhaven and Shelter Island. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Pro.iect Manager. Responsible for coordination of activities associated with public utility wireless communications facilities. Technical tasks include the preparation of visual studies, zoning studies, EAFs, EISs, wetlands applications, testimony, and hearing exhibits, as well as testifying at hearings. VI-lB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C., 1757-24 Veterans Memorial Highway, Islandia, New York. January 2009 - present. Erin E. Duffy Echevarria Continued, p. 3 Project Manager. Responsible for coordination of activities associated with public utility wireless communications facilities. Technical tasks include the preparation of visual studies, zoning studies, EAFs, EISs, wetlands applications, testimony, and hearing exhibits, as well as testifying at hearings. Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc., 1757-24 Veterans Memorial Highway, Islandia, New York. April 2005 - December 2008. Environmental Analyst. Responsible for research and compilation of reports, preparation of grant applications (i.e., Bond Act, ~4% Program, EPA Region 2), attendance at various meetings, presentation of environmental studies and programs, and preparation of negative declarations and short forms for SEQRA compliance. Suffolk County Department of Health Services - Office of Ecology, 300 Center Drive, Riverhead. June 2003 - April 2005. Principal Researcher. Responsible for development and execution of research project focused on bottlenose dolphin feeding behavior in Bull Creek, South Carolina, which included leading researchers in the field, and subsequent compilation and analysis of relevant data. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth in conjunction with Myst/c Aquarium, Bluffton, South Carolina. June 2002 - August 2002. Teacher's Assistant. Responsible for assisting professors in undergraduate Biology of Organisms laboratories, and taught laboratory sections of Populations Biology. Duties included preparation of labs, lectures, homework and exams, as well as working directly with students in laboratory and tutoring sessions. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Road, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts. August 2001 - May 2003. Biolo~st. Responsible for handling various marine life, including seals, sea turtles and dolphins. Also, educated the general public through tours and lectures, prepared documentation for grants, and scheduled for fund-raising events. Riverhead Foundation for Marine Research and Preservation, Main Street, Riverhead. March 2001 - August 2001. Erin E. Duffy Echevarria Continued, p. 4 Education MS, Marine Biology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 2003 BA, Natural Science, Fordham University, 2001 NOTES: 1) ELEVATIONS NAVD 1929 DATUM. E 2) PILINGS INSIDE MARINA NOT INDICATED. 3) FLOOD ZONES EXTRAPOLATED FROM F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #88 OF 1026, MAP#36103C0088 G DATED MAY 4, 1998. 4) A REVIEW OF THE PRELIMINARY DIGITAL FLOOD HAZARD DATA FOR THIS LOCALE (THE NEW FEMA FLOOD ZONE MAPS) INDICATES THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE PREMISES ARE IN AN AE 9 FLOOD ZONE. A VERY SMALL AREA COVERING THE BULKHEADS AT THE SOUTHERLY ENTRANCE TO THE MARINA ARE INDICATED IN AVE (ELEV. 13) ZONE. NOTE THAT THE ELEVATIONS ON THIS MAP ARE IN 1929 GOVERNMENT ISSUED DATUM AND THE PRELIMINARY FLOOD MAPS ARE SHOWN IN NAVD 1988 DATUM, WHICH ~S APPROXIMATELY 1 FOOT LOWER THAN THE 1929 DATUM. MAIN ROAD (S.R 25) (66') ~87o09,26.E 420' +/- +74 END / / / / / / / / S87°09'20"W 30.00' J SHEET NO' PROJECT: PROJECT No. 06q)099 FILE No. MAP OF LAND OF DESlG.EDDATE: BY: JULY2009 SCALE: 1"=40' ~ M.G.H. ENTERPRISES D~wNsY: ~s,K~JO I cKo. sv: M.s ~ ~ (ORIENT POINT MARINA, 40200 MAIN ROAD) REVISED: SITE AREA= 4.64 ACRES SURVEY u.o^~ .-~-~oo~, ~. ~, .. ~-~ ~. ~, .. ~o-~ ~u~w~ o~,~,~ ~ ~ ~__~o~ F:PROJI2006106-OO991DWGIO6-OO99-TITLE.DWG ESTAB. 1872 HAWKINS WEBB JAEGER PLLC ENGINEERS- ARCHITECTS- SURVEYORS- PLANNERS 3239 ROUTE 112, BUILDING 8- SUITE 1, MEDFORD, NEW YORK 11763 PHONE (631) 732-7777, FACSIMILE (931) 732-7760 t&t rn -' 5 10532 SITE NUMBER: NYCENY1059/L1-1059 , CELLU R COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT SITE NO. NY7320 DRAWING INDEX REV. DIRECTIONS: PROJECT INFORMATION T-1 TITLE SHEET 3 MID.ND AVE (NORTH-WEST) TAKE ~AMP ~RICHT) ONTO S~-17 .TURN EIGHT ONTO RAMP TAKE RAMP {LE~) ONTO SE-4. TAKE RAMP (LE~) ONTO 1-95 EXPRESS LN [NEW JERSEY TPKE~. MERGE ONTO 1-95 [NEW SCOPE OF WORK: AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AT GRADE LEVEL ATOP NEW JERSEY TPKE] KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO 1-295 [CROSS B~ONX EXPY EXT]. TAKE RAMP (R[CHT) ONTO CROSS ELEVATED STEEL EQUIPMENT P~TFOEM AND RE~TED ANTENNAS SP-1 SITE P~N 3 IS~ND PKY AT EXIT 3OK, KEEP EIGHT ONTO RAMP ~0.4 MI). TAKE RAMP (LE~) ONTO 1-495 [LONG ~S~ND MOUNTED INSIDE NEW RF TRANSPARENT MONOPOLE. EXPY] AT EXIT 75, TU~ OFF ONTO RAMP KEEP LE~ TO STAY ON ~AMP BEAR RIGHT (EAST) ONTO SP-2 EN~RGED ClNGU~R EQUIPMENT P~N AND GENERAL NOTES 3 [0~ COUNTRY RD], KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO ~-25 [MAIN RD] TUrN L[~ (NORTH-WEST) ONTO LOVE LN. SITE ADDRESS: 40200 MAIN ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 SP-3 EN~RGED METROPCS EQUIPMENT P~N AND ANTENNA DETAIL 3 TUrN RIGHT (NORTH-EAST) ONTO CR-48 [MIDDLE ~D] TURN LE~ (NO~TH) ONTO C~-48 [MA~N ED]. KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO SE-25 [MAIN ~D~. AE~IVE AT MAIN RD, OEJENT POINT NY 11957 PROPER~OWNER: ORIENT BY THE SEA EBTAU~ANT SP-4 EAST ELEVATION 3 CONTACT'PERSON: BO~ H~SE (631) 325-2424 535 CROSSWAYS PA~K D~IVE 5 SKYLINE DE. WOODBUEY, NEW YORK ~797 HAWTHORNE, NY ~0532 ~TITUDE: N 4V 9' 9" **NAD ~ .~e .~' ~ JURISDICTION: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~%~ + ~ o ~ /' PROPOSED USE: MARINA/WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FAC[LI~ CODE AND STANDARDS: e ~o~~"~ SITE PARTICIPANTS ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: : ~"'~i~ -BUILDING CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~ ........ ~ ~ , -BUILDING OFFICIALS AND CODE ADMINISTRATION (BOCA) ~ ~~,,' ~.s~/ A/E NElL A. MACDONALD WILLIAM Z. COLLINS, AIA (631) 689-8450 -BUILDING CODE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ' 6°~ ,/~.~~'/ ARCHITECTS. LLP -NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC) ~ SAC VICTORIA BRENNAN SHORE 2 SHORE (651) 807-7856 -NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) -AMERICAN SOCIE~ FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS (ASTM) ¢~"'~'~ RF SERHAD GUVEN BECHTEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS (201) 755-4297 -AMERICAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (ASA) ¢~,, -UNDERWRITERS ~BORATORIES (UL) CON RICHARD CHIAPPA BECHTEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS (201) 218-7763 -NATIONAL ELECTRIC MANUFACTURES ASSOCIATION (NEMA) ~,~,~ CONTAC:T BOB H~SE ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT (651) 525-2424 SCALE: NTS ¢¢,->..~ NEW CINCULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC ORIENT BY THE SEARESTAURANT, i i A ~/11/~ ISSUE0 FOR FILING OHM ~F NM /~'(~;:~;} ·. [ .:% ~5-6478 metroPCS, LLC. 6 5 4 ~ 5 2 EXISTING OVERHEAD ~ ~'~ UTILITY LINES FROM ~ \ \ \ X ~ MULTI-CARRIER M~ER ~NK TO NEW X X OWNED BY ORIENT / ~X X ' ~ ~A X X ~ CINGU~R/M~ROPCS ELECTRIC PANELS ~OUNTED X ~ POINT STATE PARK Z / .,.~ ~ X ~X ~ ~ ON THEIR RESPECTIVE NEW EL~ATED EQUIPMENT EXISTING TRANSFORBER, ~) / / ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' LOCATION OF N~ x ~ ~-~ ~ MULTI-CARRIER ELECTRIC ~ X ~O~ / ~ ~ x ~ ~/ ~/~ X ~ ~ '~ NEW M~ROPOS EQUIPMENT CAB IN~S 5 /" 5~ ~%¢¢' MOUNTED ON N~ EL~AteD ~ / ~ - ,~ ' NEW MULTI-CARRIER 80'-0" HIGH Rg ~ ~ ~~yENDA~E ~NO~LE X ~ NEW CINGU NEW 14-0 dUNIPERUS r-o" c.c., CABIN.S MOUNTED ON NEW ~'~ . -~ ~ ~TRENCNE~ TO BE THE CONSTRUCTION ANB P~CEMENT 1 ~'~ ~ ~ ~ / EXISTING BOAT ~UNCH RAMP EXISTING SHORELINE .... TO ADgACENT GRAPHIC SCALE. SITE ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT , i a ~ o6/11/~ ISSUED FOR FILING OHM ~F "" /x o <~ . 05 6478 metroPCS, LLC. metro DOS '" WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ~ ~ 04/01/~ iSSUED FOR riliNG GHM ALr "U [/~// ~fi SITE P~N A ~ C . ] T ~ C · S, ~. ~ metroPCS · NY7320 WIRELESS, INC. A 0~/~/o~,~ ~o. ~,..~ ~ *~ NEW CINGULAR WIREL[$S PCS, LLC 12-1TECHNOEOGYDEI~ SETA~T, NYII733 ~0200 MA~N RD 55~ CROSSWAYS PARK DRWE 5SKYL~DE. NO. DATE ~S~ONS .y CHX ~'~ dOB NO, SITE NO DRAWING NUMBER ~ ~ NYCENY~ 059 voice. ~3]-~s~-~4~o F~ ~3~,-S4~, ORIENT POINT, N.Y. ~ 1957 WOODBURY, NEW YOR~ ~1797 HAWTHOrN, NY10532 sc~E:*s .o~[~ om~.E~ ~,*w. ,~.*w ' Y~ ' ~.~' 2~897 NYT~20 SP ~ ,- DFN=S~[ 160,0~ owo 2i.x 54 6 5 4 J~ 5 2 c "' GENERAL NOTES: 1. EXISTING STRUCTURE, TRUE NORTH, AND MISC. INFORMATION WERE TAKEN FROM VARIOUS SOURCES OF INFORMATION, I.E.: FIELD MEASUREMENTS, PLAN DRAWINGS SUPPLIED BY THE OWNER, PHOTOGRAPHS, INFORMATION FROM ClNGULAR. THIS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL SURVEY PERFORMED BY WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ARCHITECTS, LLP OR ANY OTHER THIRD f PROPOSED CONCRETE PARTY. PAD MOUNTED MESA ~ ! ~;l:>AKI P~!qlldkI-r 2. THIS PROPOSAL IS FOR THE PLACEMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ON AN ELEVATED PLATFORM AT GRADE LEVEL ~'~X~ ! .............. AND THE PLACEMENT OF ANTENNAS IN A NEW RF COMPATIBLE MONOPOLE. PROPERTY LINE, TYP. ] ~2~'~-~0~. . / 3. OCCUPANCY IS LIMITED TO PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION, APPROXIMATELY TWO TIMES PER MONTH, BY CINGULAR ~E/~~<(%0~ ~ / TECHNICIANS. e'"~ '~ X / 4. NO NOISE, SMOKE, DUST OR ODOR WILL RESULT FROM THIS PROPOSAL. DASHED LINE REPRESENTS ~ '¢'07'~' ~ / 5. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CINGULAR PROJECT EXISTING TREES, LOW LYING 'W~y.,<,,\ ~ ! SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL CODES VEGETATION, TRAILER AND ~ ___ ,~.)' ~ ..-- ~.~ ~ '~'"~t--~--'~" ~ ~ 6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. BOATS TO BE CLEARED J ' ....... ' ~ ~ 7. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION. TO START OF PRIOR - ~ 8. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS FROM THE SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. CONSTRUCTION ~--% ~ 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PLAN DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ~ ~ ENGINEER AND BECHTEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR PROCEEDING WITH ~ ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION. ~ ~ ~"-"*'":-'~ / ~ .',...-¢ T/E-- lO. PHOTOGRAPH AND DOCUMENT EXISTING BUILDING OR SITE CONDITIONS OR DAMAGE WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE BE CONSTRUED .,~)~/.L.'~'~ . ._~,]~.~)/~./~N~.~~/~i)//.~. ? ~~G~L~/~!,-~ TO HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. +1 ~~~a-~l%k~~'~ =~' ~b /'~(11~ ~--[./ ~m~mm~n ~,.~.,.~ 11.THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ~ ~ ~$~_ '(~]$~ ~ ~.~/ N~i~ikli~i~i~T,~,ki~~''' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE .I ~~ ~~ ~~ I%l~ll~"D~ ~"'~ 12 THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXSTNG MPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, ~N~SCAPNG AND STRUCTURES. ANY ~ ' , r~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ i/ ~( ~, ~ , ........... MPATIBLE ' , I ~ ~~ ~{~/ ~t¢¢,~¢~47 CONC~LMENT MONOPOLE. DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT SUBCONTRACTORS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. I ~~~(l~L~ ~ ~~ ~'(/~{~'7 1 ANTENNA PER SECTOR 13 ALL EXSTNG ACTVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE D~D~rn ~I~nHI~P I ~:~1~ ~ ~ ~p h ' 'PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS ~,'~%~%~ ~A'~ I ~ , ,, L ~~ ~% ___. /2 % DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING ~'""~"' ~ ...... ~ 21'-11" - 7 2 , ~ I~1 ~ ~ ~ . ~ PIERS AROUND OR N~R UTILITIES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFE~ TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ~ ' ~ ....................... ~ ....... n" ~ ~ , ~/~V ~-~ INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCHING EL~ATED GALVANIZED ' ) 1 -10% ¢ -6 i~ 6 ¢ -6 2 6 ~2 -6 ~2 6 .Z --b b b 4 --Z ,o --u , ~ k / /~. /x v STEEL P~TFORM ~ ' ~'((~Z~ V I 1~ 1~ I lfl 9- I ~1'-9 % ' ~ ~/ / ;%~ 14. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE ~ _ _~~~--~x---x~x~x----x~~x---x~ ~ / (/ ~ WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE ~ / ~~ ~ -~ ~~~~- ~ ~ ' ~/ % WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, AS DIRECTED BY THE RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER, AND SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF % *~ '~~.F~ II1~ %~ II 1%~~ ~: /" /] . ~ I ~ THE OWNER AND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. PROPOSED CINGU~R 12 ¢-- ~%~ I 0 - 15. THE AREAS OF THE OWNER S PROPER~ DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE MONOPOLE OR EQUIPMENT H~Gh.C~E~¢~ WITH , m ~ ~--¢¢4'~' I II1',1 II II1~ S I I.I I ~ ~ / / / /t I ~r SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION. ,-o Itl ." ,L I1: ,, . I < / o_.~ ,o¢, 16.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MN M ZE DISTURBANCE TO EX STNG STE DUR NG CONSTRUCT ON EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF , %~~ /%','1111 IT ~q$1"J~" '.~ : ~1/ I1/~ill'~1 I1~ .¢/~' /~ k ~ T~u~ REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT I , ~1 =,11'.1 ~ll ~11 Iff :~ !! / I'1~ /~./'/~ ~ ~ CONTROL. ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ 17.THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CINGU~R PROJECT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE DOCUMENT NO. 24897-011-O00-SPS-AO02 00015. PROPOSED 1'-0 HIGH ~, , x J~NI~ERUS VIRGINIANA ~/ ~ ¢ ~~1 I I;11 I;I I ~9 / / ~// / ~ x 7-0 0 C. ~P OF (40~~ ~ , _ ~// / ~ X--D~HED LINES REPRESENT EXISTING ' ' ' ' ' cJ~ / ~ SHUDDERY AND LOW LYING '~.~¢ ~ / ~ VEG~ATION TO BE REMOVED ~.~ lO'-O:'~"f)/' . ,,.-' L/Jr)' ~k//"'" 5'-10" , / ~ ~ir~/~ - M?~W~ ~q~ ~M(~(~ / /~:.(~ / / ~ /%DASHED LINES REPRESENTA PROPOSED OINGU~R GPS ANTENNA, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ _ ~ O _ k3 ~ [ E STING WOODE ~ . ..... ~ . .~ O ~ R~AINING WALL TO BE POLe MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ~ -~ ~ ~ ~0~ ~ ~0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I / PROPOSED ClNGU~R ANTENNA / ~ II / / . ~,~ / -~l~);L~~ CA.L TRAY .R DaN /-- / / I ' PROPOSED CINGU~R COAIAL ANTENNA /~~~ ~¢:{~¢~ ~_~¢;t~. / / ' ~:(~~ CABLES ROUTED THROUGH PROPOSED / ~~ ~~ ~¢~ / / ~ ¢~ MONOPOLE ~ ~)~ >C~,[)~~ ~2~ / ~ ~t)~~ / / -~- ~,~ PROPOSED tELCO CONDUIT TRENCHED UNDERGROUND ' ' ~1~ / /' ') / / (~ () ' FROM PROPOSED MESA SPAN CABIN~ TO PROPOSED ~ / / / / j ClNGU~R TELCO PANEL MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ~ / / / / / m ~ RF C~MPATIBLE EX~NDABLE MONOPOLE ANEL ~ ~ /u DB 9A~//DLUB: MULTI CARRIER M~ER BANK TO PROPOSED CINGU~R ELECTRIC P ~ / / / ~ z ~SWO068 COPEN BLUE" o...o.os.. / / / , - MONOPOLE AND ANTENNAS~~ ~ m ~/ ~ o DRAWING DEPICTS THE INSTAL~TION OF NEW ANTENNAS, / / ~ ~ ~ ~ CABLING ~C. THAT ARE TO BE MOUNTED WITHIN THE N~ RF PROPOSED MONOPOLE FOUNDATION BY OTHERS. ' ' ~ / LEGEND: COMPATIBLE MONOPOLE STRUCTURE. A CONCAVE FOUNDATION SEE NOTE BOX THIS SHE~ ~ / IS TO BE DESIGNED BY A NEW YORK STATE LICENSED A A ANTENNA CABLE A / PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. SIGNED AND S~LED DOCUMENTATION DB~Dncrn tF/~ n~NnlllT TRFNCHED UNDERGROUND<~o'-~ / T T teLCO CONDUIT FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE FILED BYOTHERS. 1~N FROM PROPOSED MESA SPAN CABIN~ TO PROPOSE V / E E ELECTRIC CONDUT , ~/I M~ROPCS PTC CABIN~ B~OND I NOTE: o' 2' 4' 8' PARTIAL SITE--T/E T/E-- TELCO · ELECTRIC IF ~IS SHEET IS 11" X 17" REFER ~ CONDUIT TO ADJACENT G~PHIC SCALE. MD"=u-o" NORTH :& metro~CS ~ '2'17/~ ISSUED FOR FILING OHM ~ ~" :: .~-: -'.~ / ~EW Cl~OULAR WlRELE%% PC%, LLO .:'.:~*.~',~:~.,.:,,.~ .~/7 ,'?:- 05 6478 metroPCS, LLC. ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAUIRANT , . , A 06/,,/~ ,ssu[D ~o. FlLl"G ~HM ALF NMV'~. A R e H I T ~ C T ~, g L P metroPCS · ~YT~O Wl~ I~C. ~ ~/~/~ ,ssu~ ~o, ~,L,~ ,w ~[~ ~" _ : ...~ ~' AND GENERAL NOTES NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC , , / 12-1TEC~OL~YD~VE SETA~ET,~II733 40200 MAiN RD 535 CROSSWAYS PARK DRIVE 5SKYL~DR. NO, BATE RBISIONS BY CHK ~P'O JOB NO SITE NO. DRAWING NUMBER R~ vo~c~. ~3~-6~-s4¢o tax ~31-~8~-s4s~ ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 WOOBBURY, NEW YORK 11797 HAWTHO~Ng, NYI0532 I ' ¢: :.~-. ; NYCENY1059 ...... scsi *s ,o~ ~s~ ~w, ~ *w %~..-~' ¢':' '~¢".._:'¢'24897 SP~2"'-' ~-;,,~. NY7320 PROPOSED CINGULAR/METROPCS ELECTRIC £ (.3) PROPOSED ME-rROPCS ANTENNAS MOUNTED ~ ~ · NOTE: 0 5/16/ CONDUITS TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM / INSIDE RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT (oo' A > 0~ ,~./-O~ ~ ANTENNA MOUNT PROPOSED C,NGU.,R/M~ROPCS ELECTR,C /. PROPOSED M~ROPOS COAX'A" ANTENNA C^BLES %~0'- P^RT NO.: PANELS MOUNTED ON THEIR RESPECTIVE // ROUTED THROUGH PROPOSED CABLE-TRAY ICE PROPOSED PLeated EQUIPMENT P~TFORMS ] / / BRIDGE TO PROPOSED MONOPOLE ~ NOTE: / / / ~PROPOSED M~ROPCS ELECTRIC CONDUIT TRENCHED ANTENNA MFG.: KATHREIN // / /UNDERGROUND FROM EXISTING MULTI-CARRIER M~ER BANK --~ PROPOSED M~ROPCS PTC / / / /tO PROPOSED M~ROPCS PTC CABIN~ MOUNTED ON ~ CABIN~ MOUNTED TO PROPOSED PART NO,: 800-10121 // / / / / / ~PROPOSED M~ROPCS L~SEP AR~ TO BE / / ---- PROPOSed GALVANIZED STEEL UMTS / / / / / RE-GRADED AND MADE L~El WITH PROPOSED / / HANDRAIL, ~P. I // / / I' / // / / ~ ---- PROPOSED M~ROPCS ~ __~_ .~ ~ __/~ -- -- -- ~~ -- ~ ~ - eou,p~[uT C~B,U~S / / / / ~ / / / MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ; / / / /// / / / EL~aTED GALVANIZED // / %/ / / ~.~ ~ ~-~L(,t~/~ /~-~L(,~t~ ~ ~ TRENCHED UNDErgROUND from ~o 5/~6" }~ / ~ ~ / ~~ ~~~ / ~J~ /1~ EXISTING UtILI~ POle ~35 TO ~ ~ ~ ~%-.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~%~A% ~ ~ ~% ProPOSEd ME~ sPan Cabin~ ~. ~7~/ AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ~.:~ ~,~ / ~~~h,~q~ ~ ~ /-~F~ p~o~ ~ ~PICAL CINGU~R ANTENNA DETAIL ~ ~o. ~ . ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ , · / ~ x ~ ~{~'~ 7'-0" O.C., ~P. OF (40) -PART NO,: 800:0504 ~ : ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o /~ ~ y ) ---(t~ ~r]. SOIL AR~ I ~,~ ,,~' - 12' 0" ~ ~ / 16' ~" ~.,. ~ ~~ , - ~U~)/~. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~g ._ SID~ View F~O~T View ~~_ p;;~,~:~ ~A~-~ ,,o,os~ .~,o,cs A ~PICAL MET~OPCS ANTENNA DETAIL ~o,w~ ~~ ~,~ ~- ~- ~. ~ 12-0 HIGH CHAINLINK SCALE: = 1'-0" c~,, ~~ FENCE WITH 4 0 NOTE: NOTE: ~ ~ ~ M~ROPCS EQUIPMENT P~TF~ ~ PROPOSED M~ROPCS COMPATIBLE MONOPOLE STRUCTURE. A CONCR~E FOUNDATION IS o ~,~ ~ ~ PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. SIGNED AND S~LED DOCUMENTATION ~ ~, ~ ~ P~TFORM HANDRAIL a a ANTENNA CABLE FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE FILED BY OTHERS. ~ ~ ~ ~ L DASHED LINES REPRESENT EXISTING WOODEN ~T T TELCO CONDUIT l~N ~ ~ ~ R~NN~NG ~ALL TO BE REMOVED ~N ENT~R~ E E ELECTRIC CONDU~T ~' ~' ~ DASHED L~NES REPRESENTS EXISTING ~ o' SHRUBBERY AND LO~ LY~N~ VEG~AqON TO BE --T/E T/E~ TELCO · ELECTR~C ~F TH~S SHEET ~S ~ ~" X ~7" REFER SCALE' 1/4'=1' O'  a ~OS A 12/17/09ISSUED FOR FILING GHM *Lr ~ --- - ~ WFC PROJECTNO, NEW CINOULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC .'.t~/s.F.tvr~' ~.~ 05-6478 metroPCS, LLC. ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT , , , ~ 0~/'1/0' IS~U~ ~0" F'LIN~ ~"~ ~L~ "" ~ -- ~ '.& metro ,,5-,,? ~~ A R C H I T E C T S. L L P metroPCS · NY7320 LLC WIRELESS, INC. ~ 0,/2,/0.IsSUed rO~ FILIN, AY' *LF ~,~~.. ' :. . i' AND ANTENNA DETAIL 12-~TEC.~O~OOW~v~ SETAU~ET,~mSS 40200 MAin RD ~53 CROSSWAYS PARK DRIVE 5 SKYLINE DR. NO, DATE R~ISIONS BY CHK APP'D ~f ,~,~,_~__~.~ ~/ JOB NO SITE NO. DRAWING NUMBER VOICE. 631~89-8450 F~: 631~89-8459 ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 WOODBURY, NEW YORK 11797 HAWTHO~E,~ 10532 sc~[: As NOrEO [o[s,~,~o I°~w" ~Y ,v~ .t. qr.... ........ '~" '~.- 24897 NY7320NYCENY1059 SPz~:,,,: c- 5 6 ~ 4 ~k 5 2 2 11/ 6"/ FRONT VIEW TO'.- N"~--W EXTENDABLE / (3) NEW METROPCS ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE MONOPOLE / RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MONOPOLE, A / TYP., (1 PER SECTOR) .~ 77'-o", AGL / -,~-,~ ~P' PAD. CNTR. OF' NEW j / NEW METROPCS COAXIAL CABLES ROUTEDV ClNGULAR ANTENNAS ... / / ALONG NE'W CABLE BRIDGE TO NE'W /2~ (3) NEW ClNGULAR ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE ~ / MONOPOLE /~. (~ A-~2 RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MONOPOLE, / / x?x~' TYP., (1 PER SECTOR)~ / PAD. CNTR. OF , ,, F'UTURE ANTENNAS NEW MULTI-CARRIER 80-0 HIGH RF COMPATIBLE EXTENDABLE MONOPOLE AND ANTENNAS ~ [- --NEW ClNGULAR GPS ANTENNA, ~ ~ \ POle MOUNTED TO NEW ANTENNA~---~ ~ \ CABLE SUPPOrt RaCk ~ ~ , ,, ~ ~ 57-0 :t: AGL , ,, PAD CNTR OF NEW \ /~-~~NEW CINGULAR 12-0 HIGH CHAINLINK~ I ~ ' ' ~ ~-:~.~-~-::~-~ , ,, ~. I / ' \NEW GALVANIZED STEEL METROPCS ANTENNAS ~ / . \ NEW CINGULAR CABLE TRAY ICE ~- CABINET MOHU / NEW METROPCS LEASED AREA TO_NEw METROPCS PTC \ ~A-4/ BRIDGING ~ \ ~1\ .~w~. ;';~;~'~G ~.-~" / / BE RE-GRADED AND MADE LEVEL NEW CINGULAR CABLE \ V \ \ I \ .................. v / / WITH NEW CINGULAR LEASED TRAY ICE BRIDGE ~ ~ NFW lz~' n" high \ \ ] \ ~,. /x / / EQUIPMENT AREA \ ....... - ....... \ / \ , . CABIN.S MOUNTED ON 7-0 O.C., ~P. OF (40)~ ~ NEW EL~ATED [ ~DASHED LINES REPRESENT ...... .. ........................ ~ v ~ ~ ~ EXISTING WOODEN R~AINING WALL ~ 14'-0~ AGL ~ ~ ) STEEL HANDRAIL, ~P. ~-7/ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ . .. / / / / T~. NEW JUNIPERUS ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ I ] ~ NEW CINGU~R 12'-¢ HIGH / / / / VlRGINIANA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ C~AI~LINK FENCE WITH / ~ ~ / v,~,,~,~,~ ~ X ~ ~ NEW ClNGU~R EQUIPMENT CABIN.S ~ ~ ~ / ~ .............. / I I ~ ~ ~ MOUNTED ON N~ EL~ATg~"-~- ~ ~ ~I I ~ ~;u .u~A~.~ ~A,~ / / / / ....... , .., ...... ~ 12'-0~ ~L ~ X ~ ~ ~ NEW 200 AMP POWER PANEL ~ ~ X ~ II l ~ ~-~ ~-~ ~-~ / I / I / / ~ 7'-0" O.C., ~P. OF (40) T~. N~ FENCE AND T.O. ~W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WITH EMERGENCY GENE~TOR ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ .V ~DnO~v ~ TM / / /r / / CINGU~R ICEBRIDGING CABLE ~ ~ ~ ~ RECEPTACLE MOUNTED TO N~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ /2~ GPS UNIT MOU~TED / / / / / / 12--6 /// / // ~T~Y EQUIPMENT P~TFORM HANDRAIL,, T~Y B~OND P~TFORM T.O. N~ AT~T J ~ I~ ~~ ~':[~ ~ /:t'~11 /~ ~ II Iii f'l~ I~ /. ] / f '/ / f / / EQUIPMENT CABIN~ ~: :"g ]~ '~}~ ~ H /::'i '..~L /~ ~ ~ /':-'-~ I /: NEW ClNGU~R ANTENNA CABLE : 4'-0"~ AGL SUPPORT RACK~ - ~:qB::-::t ::1'11~ ~~~: ~ :-. :':: ~ / ~:::: t::. ~ r.-.--.-:- ~, ~, .x:x{-:tI[tP-:I '"'ll"d~ '-~-L / ~ '.v :~Z / EQUIPMENT P~TFORM ..... ... ......... ...... ...... ..... ............. ~-{:P. :-:-:-: -:---x-:-.- '-: :-: :--x-: :-:-:-x :: '::~::~.:.{~.-:--~ .. :-: :: -::- _ __:~ :::-L :-'::::'~--::: ~-: .-:~. .:: :-- :--:-.- ~ 0'-0"~ AGL 0'-0"~ AGL LLbL~U: : TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM N~ ~5'-6" ~ ~ VV ~ OF NEW ANTENNAS, CABLING ~C. E E ELECTRIC CONDUIT EQUIPMENT P~TFORMS ~ THAT ' ARE TO BE MOUNTED WITHIN THE N~ RF COMPATIBLE MONOPOLE '-~N T/E T/E-- TELCO ~ ELECTRIC STRUCTURE. A CONCR~E FOUNDATION CONDUIT NOTE: RF COMPATIBLE EXTENDABLE MONOPOLE ~ o' 2' 4' 8' IS TO BE DESIGNED BY A NEW YORK STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL TO B~ "~A~/~LUE: S,~W,,-~LL,AUS ,F ~,S S,~,T ,S 11" X ~7" ~EFE~ ~ I E~,E,~. S,C,~ A,D S~LED ~EAST ELEVATION ~swoo,~ co,~, ,LU~". TO *DJ*CE,T ~PA,,IC SCALE. ~";1'-o" DOCU~E,TATIO, FO~ T~IS WOrX .0.~. SCALE: ~/4'=~'-0' ~ SHALL BE FILED BY OTHERS. ~ ~ ,~/,¥~, ,~....o..,..~ ~"~ ~"" ""~7~ w~c ..o~c~ .o. NEW CINOU~R WIRELESS PCS, LLC :& :rD :CS ORIENT BY THE S~ RESTAURANT , , , &~o,~,~o, .~.~ ~o~ ~.u.~ ~.*~.. i/~tZ~:,~%,~F},~N 05 6478 metroPCS, .LLC'. ~~~[~"~~,~1~~;~"~'-~ ..... AT&T · NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 I , ~ ,,~,, ,~ ~o~ ~,u~ ~ ,~,, ~ .... :'~ :' , z ~ c . ~ · [ c · s, ~ ~.metroPCS · NY7320 WlRELESS~ IHC, ': - '~ EAST ELEVATIONS ]2-tT~C~OLOOYD~VE S~TA~T, NY[I733 ~0200 MAIN RD 553 CROSSWAYS PARK DRIVE 5S~YL~DR, NO. DATE R~ISlONS BY CHK APP'D ' JOB NO SITE NO+ DRAWING NUMBER REV vo~c~ ~]-~s~-~4~0 ~ ~-~¢-~4~¢ ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 WOODBURY, NEW YORK 11797 ~WTHOENE. NY10532 ~ ~.~A- ~..~ NYCENY1059 ' sc~[ ~s ,o~ ~s~.~ ~w, ~ ~w ~ ~'~"::-::~' 24897 NY7320 SP-4 LANDS LATHAM LANE (50') / ,?, z~ 11II LITTLE BAY (ORIENT BEACH STATE PARK) LONG ISLAND STATE PARK COMMISSION 161' OWNERS WITHIN A 500' RADIUS: PROPERTY USE & ZONING: 50 THREE WATERS LANE DANIEL, EUGENE & 5TACIE NICKOL~ RESIDENCE . R 40 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT I DO CERTIF'Y THAT THIS RADIUS MAP ACCURATELY DESCRIBES THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF THE PROPERTIES SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT PARCEL, AS OF 12/22/200g NAMES AND ADDRESSES SHOWN WERE OBTAINED FROM THE CURRENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ASSESSORS OFFICE AT 53095 ROUTE 25, SOUTHOLD, NY ~~ MATTHEWD CRANE, LS ~ ~ ~ NOTES; PLUM ISLAND RESEARCH FACILITY A&E DESIGN PACKAGE REVIEW STATUS 1 [] ACCEPTED-NO COMMENTS, PROCEED metror-----' CC-- 2 [~ COMMENTS ·~ ~ A[~SAC INFO MISSING/INCOMPLETE F [] DESIGN DEVIATION FROM STANDARD B [] A&E DID NOT FOLLOW DIRECTIONS PROVIDED G [] OMISSIONS ~ !~ ~ ~ t ~ C ~ SITE OWNER REQUESTED CHANGES H ~ A~E GENERATED CHANGE IN DESIGN ~ , W ~ D O DESIGN INPUT CHANGES I.E. RF/ZONiNG REQ. I O ClNGU~R CHANGED SITE DESIGN I In imi , l ourself e~ REMISEDSITE DESIGN J ~ OTHER: ~ WIRELESS , , . PERMISSION TO PROCEED DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OR APPROVAL OF DESION DETAIL, CALCU~TIONS, ANALYSIS, TEST METHODS OR MATERIALS D~ELOPED OR SELECTED BY THE SUPPLIER. IT DOES NOT REUEVE SUPPLIER FROM FULL COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACTUAL C 1511 :I W :1 : ESS CS, . _C510532OBLIGATIONS. . ~ ~ · REVIEWED BY: RE/PE DATE: SITE NUMBER: NYCENY1059 / L1-1059 CELLU R COMMUNIEATION EQUIPMENT SITE NO. NY7320~ ENGINEER SA MARKET CONSTRUCTION SITE NAME: ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT OPIENT BY THE SEA PESTAUPANT LEAD DRAWING INDEX REV. DIRECTIONS: PROJECT INFORMATION m-1 TITLE SHEET 3 MID~ND AVE (NORTH-WEST) TAKE RAMP {RIGHT) ONTO SR-17 SCOPE OF WORK: AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY INCLUDING TURN RIGHT ONTO RAMP TAKE RAMP (LE~) ONTO SR-4 TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AT GRADE LEVEL ATOP NEW TAKE RAMP (LE~) ONTO 1-95 EXPRESS LN [NEW JERSEY TPKE] ELEVATED STEEL EQUIPMENT P~TFORM AND RE~TEB ANTENNAS A-1 SITE P~N 3 MERGE ONTO 1-95 [NEW JERSEY TPKE] KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO 1-295 [CROSS BRONX EXPY EXT] MOUNTED INSIDE NEW RF TRANSPARENT F~GPOLE. TAKE RAMP (RIGHT) ONTO CROSS IS~ND PKY AT EXIT 5OH, KEEP RIGHT ONTO RAMP (0.4 MI) A-2PARTIAL SITE P~N,NOTES AND DETAILS 3 TAKE RAMP (LE~) ONTO 1-495 [LONG IS~ND EXPY] AT EXIT 75, TURN OFF ONTO RAMP SITEA~DRESS: 40200 MAIN RD. (a.k.a.S.R. 25) A-3 ELEVATIONS 3 KEEP LEFT TO STAY ON RAMP BEAR RICHT (EAST) ONTO CR-58 ~OLD COUNTRY RD~ ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO SR-25 EMAIN RD] TURN LEFT (NORTH-WEST) ONTO LOVE LN A-4 ClNGU~R ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS 3 TURN RIGHT (NORTH-EAST) ONTO CR-48 EMIDDLE RD] TURN LE~ (NORTH) ONTO CR-48 [MAIN RD~ PROPER~OWNER: ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT A-4a METRO PCS ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS 3 KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO SR-25 [MAIN RD] ARRIVE AT MAIN RD, ORIENT POINT NY 11957 A-5 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS 3 CONTACT PERSON: BOB H~SE (631) 323-2424 A-6 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILS 3 A-7 ClNGU~R STRUCTURAL FRAMING P~N, NOTES AND DETAILS 3 VICINI~ MAP APPLICANT: NEW CINGU~R WIRELESSPCS,LLC 15 EAST MID~ND AVENUE A-7a METRO PCS STRUCTURAL FRAMING P~N, NOTES AND DETAILS 3 PARAMUS, Nd 07652 ~TITUDE: N 41' 9' 9" **NAD SlTE~ LONGITUDE: W 72' 14' 38.8" **NAD (85) E-1 ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM AND NOTES 3 ~,~.~ ~ ~ ELEVATION: 7'-0' AMSL **NAVD (88) E-2 ELECTRICAL DETAILS, SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS 3 ¢~ ' JURISDIICTION: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~ ~ ~' ~~ T~ I.D.i NUMBER: ELK:9 LOT: 8,1 SEC: 15 E-3 TELCO, ELECTRIC, GROUNDING P~N AND DETAILS 3 *~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ e .~,~,, ~o ~¢ ~ ZONING DISTRICT: ZONE: MARINE II MAP:N/A E-4 GROUNDING DETAILS 3 ~ ~.~ ~. ~,,~ ~ ..¢~ ~ h. E-5 METRO PCS EQUIPMENT GROUNDING P~N & DETAILS 3 % %~[ ~ '~//~ ~ '~~ CURRENT USE: MARINA ,,~ / / PROPOSED USE: MARINA/WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILI~ E-6 METRO PCS GROUNDING SCHEMATIC & DETAILS 3 ~ ~o ~ CODEAND STANDARDS: ¢' ' *¢ '!.,. ¢ / ~,.¢ SITE OUaLIFICaTIO. Pa. TICIPa. TS ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ~ .~'?~,e ,~' o%. } ~,"'""~"~'" -BUrLDING CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -AMERICAN SOCIE~ FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS (ASTM) ~,~c,' ~ ~ o~- -%o¢/*' ,¢,~,,=~ NAME COMPANY NUMBER BUILDING OFFICIALS AND CODE ADMINISTRATION (BOCA)-AMERICAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (ASA) '.,~-~'~-~ ~ ..//~ ~.s~ / A/E NElL A. MACDONALD WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA (631) 689-8450 -BUILDING CODE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -UNDERWRITERS ~BORATORIES (UL) ~o*e"~¢~.~ // ARCHITECTS, LLP -NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC) -NATIONAL ELECTRIC MANUFACTURES ASSOCIATION (NEMA) _~ ~ -NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) ~¢ ,~ ¢.¢.. SAC VICTORIA BRENNAN SHORE 2 SHORE (651) 807 7856 ~ ~ ¢~,~ ~¢'~*~ RF SHAHED HUSAIN BECHTEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS (978) 259-5528 CON R~CHARD CHIAPPA BECHTEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS (201) 218-7765 ~.,~. CONTACT BOB H~SE ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT (651) 525-2424 SCALE: NTS ~ ~FC PROJECT NO CINCULAR WIRELESSPCS,LLC. ORIENT BY THE S~ RESTAURANT /z,~~;:~ 35 6478AND metroPCS, LLC. ~~ NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 ~ ~/~,/0~ ,~u~o ~o~ ~o.~.,~,,o, ~.,,~,. ~ ¢/% 8 TITLE SHEET A ~ c u ~ · ~ c ~s,~ z ~ NY7320 ~ ~ W~LESS ~I~E~, INC. ~ ~/27/~ IssuED FOR CON~TRMCTION AY~ ALF NM [ ~ NEW ClNGU~R WIRELESS PCS, ~C. ]0-ITEC~OLOGYD~E S~TA~T, NY[1733 ~0200 MAI~ RD 5SKYL]NEDR. N0, DATE R~ISIONS ~ CHK APP'D JO~ N0, SITE NO DRAWING NUMBER REV PArA,US, .J 07~5~ HAWTHOENE, NY ]0532 ~~O~ NYCENY1059 ~:,.. ~.oT~ ~S,O.E~ ~W..~ ~V*W 24597 NY7520 T-1 , [ '1i ,';' A&E DESIGN PACKAGE REVIEW STATUS 1 [] ACCEPTED-NO COMMENTS, PROCEED 2 [] COMMENTS A [] SACINFO MISSING/INCOMPLETEF []DESIGN DEVIATION FROM STANDARD B[]A&E DID NOT FOLLOW DIRECTIONS PROVIDED G [] OMISSIONS C [] SITE OWNER REQUESTED CHANGES H [] A~E GENERATED CHANGE IN DESIGN D [] DESIGN INPUT CHANGES I.E. RF/ZONING REQ, I [] CINGULAR CHANGED SITE DESIGN E [] REVISED SITE DESIGN J [] OTHER: PERMISSION TO PROCEED DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OR APPROVAL OF DESIGN DETAIL, CALCULATIONS, ANALYSIS, TEST METHODS OR MATERIALS DEVELOPED OR SELECTED BY THE SUPPLIER. IT DOES NOT RELIEVE SUPPLIER FROM FULL COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS. REVIEWED BY: RE/PE BATE: RF ENGINEER SA MARKET CONSTRUCTION LEAD dUN 21 2010 UTILITY LINES FROM ~ \ \ \ X NEW TELCO CONDUIT TRENCHED PROPERTY LINE, ~. ~ .~ ~ 'XX X X X~ . UTILI~ POLE ~35 TO N~ MESA ~ EXISTINC RESTAURANT . ~ ~ '~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NEW CINGU~R/MDROPCS ELECTRIC CONDUITS SPAN CABIN~ AT SOUTHWEST ~ ~ ~ ~n .~PIN~ FUELmi; ~ .~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM N~ CORNER OF PROPERS-- x ~ / EX~STING PROPER~ / ;T'~lO~' ....... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ V MULTI-CARRIER M~ER BANK TO N~ X X OWNED 9Y ORIENT / . .~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ON THEIR RESPECTIVE N~ EL~ATE9 EQUIPMENT ~XISTINC TRANSFORMer, ~ > / / ~ ~ % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x LOCATION OF N~ x ~ ~ EXISTING STORAGE NEW MDROPCS EQUIP~NT CADINDS ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ . MOUNTED ON N~ EL~ATED ~ / ~ ' /~'~ ; NEW MULTI-CARRIER 80-0 HIGH RF COMP'IBLE CARRIER 80'EXTENDABLE-~;~L~F X N~ CINGU 7 -0 O.C., NEW CINGU ~ CABIN.S M EL~ATED G P~TFORM ~'~ ~ ~,~ .-- ~ ~ · EXISTING BOATS TO START OF ~ EXISTING BOAT ~UNCH RAMP EXISTING TO ADJACENT GRAPHIC SCALE. ~.-~. wc ~oJ~c~ ~o CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. cin lular metro ' ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT ~ ~.~,~ ~.~,~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~~,~ 5 ~7~ ~ ~wo~c~, ~. ~ ~ NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 ~ ~,,,,~ .~ ~o, ~o.~.~.o~ ~.~ ~ .~ ~~~~~~ WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIR ~ ~1241~ iSSUED FO" CONSTRUCTION GHM ALF NU ~ z~ ~,if~,~ ~ SITE PLAN NEW CINGU~R WIRELESS PCS, ~C. ]0-]TECHNOL~YD~VE SETAU~T, NYIt?33 ~0200 ~N ~ 5S~ED~. NO ~TE R~ISlONS BY CHK APP'D JOB NO. 51TN NO. DRAWING N~M~E~ voice: ~3]-~-s4~0 ~Ax: ~3~-~-~4s~ ORIENT ~Ol~T, ~.~. q ~57 15 ~ST MID.ND AVENUE J J PAEAMUS, NJ 07652 ~WTHORNE, N~ ]053~ N~C[~Y~ SCALE, AS NOTED OESIGNED D~WN BY: LY/AVJ 2~7 ~7~20 ~-- ,= o~ ~o .c_ ._o E~ .-~ .? .o oO~ / (5) NEW METROPCS ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE.~,~ f NEW METROPCS LEASED AREA TO ~ / RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MONOPOLE. 1 / ,5 ~ / BE RE-GRADED AND MADE LEVEL ~',~'~..~,~. / ANTENNA PER SECTOR, TYP. '~-7o~ ~ WITH NEW CINGULAR LEASED '.~f20~_~_ / , NEW METROPCS COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLES A V / EQUIPMENT AREA 0_% 'c-~ ~X( // ROUTED THROUGH NE'W CABLE-TRAY ICE / 2 ~ ~ ....................... NEW ELECTR,C CONDU,T TRENCHED / / BR,DGE TO NEW MONOPO'E / /-- MOUNTED TO NEW STEEL l~'.-?<,?~ ~--p:o*~' UNDERGROUND FROM EXISTING MULTI-CARRIER / / ,'~ NEW METROPCS ELECTRIC CONDUIT v / / PLATFORM HANDRAIL ".~p)~O-~.O~:~(.~, '~,'"~\ METER BANK TO NEW CINGULAR ELECTRIC PANEL / / / TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM EXISTING / / ~' NEW GALVANIZED STEEL/')~ RO:R ' E, NE. ON NEW C,NGULAR EQU,PMENT / / / MULTI-CARR,ER METER BANK TO NEW / / / HANDRA, L. · t ,/,~'~2,~-¢.. ~ / / / METROPCS PTC CABINET MOUNTED ON / / / ,.,~-,,, ,,,.--,-~,,~.-.,- %o~ ~ / / / NEW M~ROPCS EQU,PMENT PLATFORM// / / ~r;,P;E%?~'N~s ~ DASHED LINE REPRESENTS / ! ! HANDRAIL / / / / MOUNTED ON NEW ?_NAJ7D./. EXISTING TREES, LOW LYING , ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ /~ ~ ~ ,~.,~.~.~ .~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ELEVATED GALVANIZED'~-/~/ '~-~ VEGETATION, TRA~LER AND I = -- -- -- ~ .... " ~ / / / / / / STEEL PLATFORM, ~P. V V BOATS TO BE CLEARED PRIOR NEW CONCRETE PAD / / ! / / / TO START OF CONSTRUCTION- ~ Nl:~A/ O. INO. III AR Tf/Qn AND F/F~TRICAL MOUNTED MESA SPAN / / / / / / / / NEW TELCO CONDUIT TRENCHED --= ...................... ~1~-~0'~ CABIN~ -- / / / / / / / / UNDERGROUND FROM EXISTING ~ PANELS MOUNTED ON N~ ~ ' ...... ~ ~NnD~lL ~ ~ ~ ~T/E~T/E~T/E~I/E ~/~ '~ ~'~ ~ -- / / ~ SPAN CABIN~ AT SOUTHWEST ~ ~~~~~ I ~Jr) kb' k'~~ (r) ~( ~!~' k~(Jr~ k~(Jr~ k~(Jr) k~(Jr~ k~ ~ ~GU~,~,, ~k CORNER OF~PRO ~ J ~~~[~ ' ~(/~[~ '(q~[,~ ~ '-~?~ ~ (-~ / ('Wl3~ ~ u~/3'- ~ ~,r~/~-, ~-F)- / ~/'.-' ~EW ClN~/a~OPCS ~*~,.,~ ~., ..~ ~ -, . ' ~ ' o" ,, j z ~'~ UNDE~O~OUND r~OM NEW EL~ATED GALVANIZED . 1 -10~ -6 ~-6 ~-6 -6 -6 ~-6.~.2-6 .,4~ .,3-0 .. ~ ?/ (~,)c) ~ ,(~ ~2~~S ~ ~:~ . d '-~lx~x~x~ ~~ ~ '~ /~' ~. ~ [ / /T ~"~ ~;R~X~= ~: ~l THEIR RESPECTIVE N~ ELECTED ~ ~~: ' "__ .... -~~~ ~. I ~ / ~ '~/~ ~l~--~'~~~~ ~Z~'(~dc "' .~oe~'~' EQUIPMENT P~TFORMS NEW ClNGU~R12'-0"HIGH ~ ~-~q,Z/~~ m ~ K~ ri xl III I ~ / / J ' / / / ~~ i [ ~] ~ ? ' v~;~X~~ "s~;~- / ' %d i vvv ~1 B ~Y/~ x ' I ~ I lB ' / ~ ~ k ~ ' / / J ( x IIII ' ~ m / IIIII x I m ~ z ~ ( ~ ) ~ 7 -00.C. ~P. OF(40) --~ ~, ~, m~- : .~ / / / ~ I' ........ ~ ~ S~ )/f)~ ~;Z~?MOUNTED TO N~ ANTENNA CABLE / ' '' / ~ ' ' / / / / .~ /'~}~/~],~q ~ 5T~/~~}~~ ~ ~ 5~~ ~P. Of (40) IAL ANTENNA r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3~ ~ ~ ~ WITH 4 0 LOC~BLE GA NEW CINGU~R CO~ ~. ~ ~l~ ~( ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~> ~ ~ CABLES ROUTED THROUGH N~ ~) ~/)~ ~A~42 CABLE-T~Y ICE BRIDGE TO NEW / '' ~_..~ ....... / - ''/ / / "" mP~ ~.~ ~ --('~'[~' ~(IF)[~~' V ..... OPOLE / ~ ~DERGROUND FROM / / / / . . o X~-~/ X~-~/ ~um~ ~.~ ~~ ~R TELCO J / / / ~ J VVV ~) / / / ~ / NEW M~ROPCS GPS UNIT~ PANEL MOUNTED ON N~ ClNGU~R EQUIPMENT ~ ~ b ~ R~AINING WALL TO BE REMOVE IN V P~TFORM HANDRAIL / / / ~ / ~ MOUNTED TO N~ ~ (5) NEW CINGU~R ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE / / / / ~ ~-R~M'0gC~ .... EQUIPMENT P~TFORM ~ RF COMPATIBLE CONC~LMEN~'0P~LE~'~'-- / / / / HAND,IL ~ ANTENNA PER SECTOR, ~P. ~ / / / / / / NOTE' :O~Ng: NOTE: ~*c~*l ummm TI ~ADOmmo em' ~" Ul~ D~ ~UD~TI~J/F / / / "-'-' ,, ,, -- DRAWING DEP[CTS THE INSTAL~TION OF NEW ANTENNAS, ~;;~;~s':~M~ ;~o ~s~: ......... / / To%~2~:~'~d ~do~~ ":~" ~ ' .,..., c,.. OA*,.o :~. ~,~ A~ ~O .~ .O~.~ W,~,,. ~: .~W ~J ' T T TELCO COINDUIT ~F COMPATIBLE MONOPOLE STRUCTURE. A CONCRETE / / J .......... FOUNDATION iS TO BE DESIGNED BY A NEW YORK STATE N~ MONOPOLE FOUNDATION BY OTHERS. SEE / J . E E ELECTRIC CONDUIT LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. SIGNED AND SEALED NOTE BOX THIS SHE~ ~ ~ J o' 2' 4' 8 . . DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE FILED BY ~ N~ TELCO CONDUIT TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM / ~ --T/E--T/E-- TELCO · ELECTRIC OTHERS. NORTH D~DTIAI RIT~ ~1 ~ /566~ NEW MESA SPAN CABINg TO NEW M~ROPCS PTC ~ 1/8"=1'-o" J CONDUIT ~ r~n m m~ vmm~ r~m~ ~A-4/ CABIN~ B~OND ~ SCALE 1/4'=1'-0' V ~ ~FC ~,o,~c~ NO CINGULAR WI~LE~ ~, LLC. ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT :: ~,~ ~}A,,~/ %5 6478 AND me,toPOS, LLg. ~ NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 ~ ~ .~,z. ,~s,o ~o. co,~.~,,o, ,.,~,. ~ WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AlA ~ /~ PARTIAL SITE PLAN, NOTES AND DETAILS A R C H I T E C T S, L L P NY7320 WIRELESS WIRELESS, INC, & ov,v. ,,,u.o .o. ~o.~,.c,,o. ,w ,, ., ~.,~/~ ~'~/ NEW GINGU~R WIRELESS PCS, LLC. vo]c~: ~]-~s45o ~: ~3~s~-~4~ O~l~NT POInt, ~.Y. 11 957 ~5 ~ST ~O~NO AVENUE J J PARAMUS, NJ 07652 HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 NYCENY/059 scA~ ~s .o~ O~S~.~ D~WN .~ ~W~W 24897 NY7~20 A-2 5 6 S 4 ~ k 5 2 ~ ~c= (3) NEW METROPCS ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE MONOPOLE -- RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MONOPOLE, /~ 'P(P., (1 PER SECTOR) ~[~ 77'-0"+ AGL "P' PAD. CNTR. OF NEW,. NEW METROPCS COAXIAL CABLES ROUTED ClNGULAR ANTENNAS ~ ALONG NEW CABLE BRIDGE TO NEW ~ (3) NEW CINGULAR ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE~ MONOPOLE(~ RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MONOPOLE, TYP., (1 PER SECTOR) ~1~ 67'-0"+ AGE ~P'RAD. CNTR. OF NEW CINGULAR/METROPCS 80'-0" HIGH FUTURE ANTENNAS RF COMPATIBLE EXTENDABLE MONOPOLE AND ANTENNAS  NEW CINGULAR CPS ANTENNA, ~ POLE MOUNTED TO NEW ANtENNA~--~.~-~ CABLE SUPPORT RACK ~ ~ 57'-0":1: AGL ~~ ~ RAD. CNTR. OF NEW \ NEW CINGULAR 12'-0" HIGH CHAINLINK ~ NEW GALVANIZED STEEL METROPCS ANTENNAS ~ /~ NEW CINGULAR CABLE TRAY ,CE ~ ~ r --NEW METROPCS PTC ... \ CABINET MOUNTED TO~-------~ / /- NEW METROPCS LEASED AREA TO BE RE-GRADED AND MADE LEVEL \ ~A-4~BRIDGING~ \ ~ \ NEW steel PLATFORMV / / WITH NEW CINGULAR LEASED NEW CINGULAR CABLE ~ V ~ \ TRAY ICE BRIDGE \ ~ NEW 14'-0" HIGH \ \ I\\ NEW METROPCS EQUiPMENT///~~// /! EQUIPMENT AREA SUPPORT POST, TYP.- -~ \ ~.A15/% JUNIPERU~ VIRGINIANA 0 \ \ '~ 7'-0" O. __ \ NEW ELEVATED GALVANIZED '*~ ~ 7 / / / TO BE REMOVED IN ENTIRETY ... STEEL NEW GALVA.,ZEDHANDRA, L, \\ \\ \\ STEEL PLAT.OPM-- EX,ST, NC L~'~14-OT,o. NEW + AGLjuNiPERUS ~ ~ ~ ~ V \ \ 1 ~' \ NEW ClNGULAR 12'-0" HIGH / / / / ~ ' ' ~: \ CHAINUNK FENCE WITH ~.~ \ ~ \MOUNTED -ON NE~ ELEVATED ~ \ \ / NEW 14'-0" HIGH \ \ \ \ \GALVAN,ZED STEEL PLATFORM \ \ ,,b 12'-0"± AGL \ X \ \ ~NEW 200 AMP POWER PANEL V \ \ \ 7'-0" O.C., WP. OF ('tO) q~ T.O. NEW FENCE AND T.O. NEW X \ \ \ \ ~ WiTH EMEROENCY OENEP~TOF~ \ \ \ ? ~ /%. NEW METROPCS / CINGULAR ~CE BR~DO~NO CABLE X X \ \ \ ~RECEPTACLE MOU~TEDTO NEW \ \ \ ~~__~GPS UNiT MOUNTED / / / / / / / T.O. NEW METROPCS TRAY X \ \ \ \ ~EQUIPMENT PLATFORM HANDF~AIL, \ \ \ ~ ',~-~ TO NEW EQUIPMENT / / / / / / , ~ T.O. NEW M~ROPCS EQUIPMENT CABIN~ ~11' 2"~ AGL ' ~T.O. N~ AT&T J ~ I~ ~ ~1 ~[~ : ANTENNA CABLE ';E- { }.-. , ' ' 4'-0"~ AGL ~ ;;'; ~;' ' M~ROPCS ~ 4'-0"~ AGL ~ ~ EQUIPMENT P~TFORM EOU~.~E.T .~TFO~. ~:.'.::-::: ~ ]F;~ ::.: __ _ GRADE T/E T/E ~ ~ T/E T/E T/E T/E T/E T/E T/E T/E T/E ~ rE ~ T/E ~ T/E- N~ CONCR~E PAD MOUNTED MESA -- / -- SPAN CABIN~ B~OND ~ NEW CINGU~R/M~ROPCS ELECTRIC CONDUITS LEGEND: TRENCHED UNDERGROUND FROM N~~~ 5'-6" A A ANTENNA CABLE CINGU~R/M~ROPCS M~ER BANK TO NEW/1~/1~ ~ ~ NOTE: CINGU~R/M~ROPCS ELECTRIC PANELS~~ DRAWING DEPICTS THE INSTAL~TION T T~ TELCO CONDUIT MOUNTED ON THEIR NEW EL~ATED OF NEW ANTENNAS, CABLING ETC. E E ELECTRIC CONDUIT EQUIPMENT P~TFORMS THAT ARE TO BE MOUNTED WITHIN THE ~4'~T, NEW RF COMPATIBLE MONOPOLE T/E T/E-- TELCO ~ ELECTRIC STRUCTURE. A CONCRETE FOUNDATION CONDUIT NOTE: O' 2' 4' 8' IS TO BE DESIGNED BY A NEW YORK STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IF THIS SHEET IS 11" X 17" REFER ~ ENGINEER. SIGNED AND SEALED NORTH ADJACENT GRAPHIC $CALE. ~/8'=1'-0" FOR THIS WORK ~EAST ELEVATION ~o SHALL BE FILED BY OTHERS. SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' ~ .~ ~c ..o~c; ~o CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. Xcingular met,o CS ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT A 0,/,,/o, ,~. ~o.  NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 A o,/,,/~ ,.s..o ,o. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Z-' I ELEVATIONS A ~ c . ] ~ ~ c · s, L ~ P NY7320 WIRELESS WIRELESS, INC. A o¢,/o~ ,,,.~. ~o. ]04 ~c.~oboeY ~lw SE~AU~T, NV ]~ 40200 MAIN RD NEW ClNGU~R WIRELESS PCS, LLC. 5 SKYL~E DE. NO DATE volc~: ~,-~,,-8,¢0 ~*x. ~,-6~,,4¢~ ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 15 BS'"ID~NBAV[NU[ I PARA'US, NJ 07652 HAWThOrNE, NY 10532 NYCENY1059 SC*L~ *S ,0T~ ~S,O.EOI°"*w" .Y ~Y/~W ~¢<~ 24897 NY7320 A 5 CUT POST LENGTH TO SUIT BY REMOVING UNCAPPED END NOTES: ~ /~[PN WE40001 OR WE40002 (SEE TABLE)] 12" WIDE X 120" LONG ICE 'I-i-;::~ BRIDGE CUT ICE BRIDGE CHANNEL 1. WHEN USING COMPONENTS AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAILS, MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SPAN BETWEEN SUPPORTS ON A CONTINUOUS SINGLE FINISH GRADE, MATCH = SECTION OF BRIDGE CHANNEL SHALL BE 9 FEET ~ ~ FOR 10 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL. SLOPE AND THICKNESS OF o o EXISTING ~ o o m ~- -~ LENGTH TO SUIT (SEE NOTES) 2. WHEN USING COMPONENTS FOR SPLICING BRIDGE H m m O00L CHANNEL SECTIONS, THE SPLICE SHOULD BE J /- COMPACTED BACKFILL PER u- ~ ~ ~ PROVIDED AT THE SUPPORT. IF POSSIBLE. OR AT ~ ~ SPECIFICATION EARTHWORK z ~ ~ ~ x x [PN WB40005 (SEE TABLE)] A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. / ~ / ~ ~< ~< ~TRAPEZE KIT ~ TRENCH ~ 6" WIDE METAL CORE, ~ ~(2) TRAPEZE KITS ARE INCLUDED / / UNDERGROUND WARNING z : 5. WHEN USING COMPONENTS. SUPPORT SHOULD BE ~~~ ~, , TAPE PRINTED WITH ~ ~ o ~WlTH ICE BRIDGE. ORDER PROVIDED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ENDS -' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~,,z ~~ ~'~ "CAUT?N BURIED UTIL]~ ~ ~' ~1 ~ADDITIONAL TRAPEZE KITS AS OF ICE BRIDGES. WITH A MAXI MUM CANTILIVER ~'~":~ ~[~:"1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~;~ ~~~ =--I' m ~:: ~ ~ ~5~REQUIRED' TO MAINTAIN MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPIPORT TO ~ CABLE SPAN OF 3'-0" (~P) THE FREE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE. RIGID STEEL RIGID GALV. STEEL ~ -II1~'~1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 4. CUT BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS SHALL HAVE ~ ~ D~ o ~ ~ ~ ANTENNA CABLES ARRANGEMENT RAW EDGES TREATED WITH A MATERIAL TO I1~111 ~ ~ o BY SUB-CONTRACTOR RESTORE THESE EDGES TO THE ORIGINAL ~ ~ ~ i., ~~%-~, ~ PAINTED RED. NMMBER OF % ~ ~ CHANNEL, OR EQUIVALENT, FINISH. ~ ', :111~ ~ ~ ~~ E ~111 litP~NKS AS REQ'D FOR -~-~ ~ COMPONENTS FROM OTHER MANUFACTURERS. . .,~' -. ~ , .~ ~" . ~ IE EI[I~ ~ PROVIDED THE MANUFACTURER'S iNSTAL~TION '-' . ' ' ' ~R~D~ ~" ~ ~ ~ BACKFILL (SAND OR ' GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED. RIGID GALV. ~ ~-~ d ~ ~ '~ IF ,, : NATVE SOIL) PER ~ ~ ~CONCRETE PIER ~ - ~ I1~_ ' STEEL CONDUIT~ / PVC SCHEDULE , ; EARTHWORK SPECIFICATION % ,' :d ' ' I1: - - ~- - ~ 6. DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS FOR COMPONENT ~ / 40 SIZE AS ' '1 , ~~ ~ "~ INSTAL~TIONS ARE PERMI~ED WITH THE RIGID GALV. STEEL ~ / i SHOWN ON Ill-SCH 40 PVC POWER ~.~ PART ~ Q~. RESPECTIVE MANUFACTURER'S APPROVAL TO PVC ADAPTER ~ ~ ' ~YOUTS SCH. 40 PVC TELEPHONE ' ~ ~'~ ~111~111~1 ~ WE40001 ROHN PART CONDUIT (1 ACTIVE, / ~: ~ ~:~1 -'~ ~ ~RN-WB-KS110-15B 7. DEVIATIONS FROM ICE BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS CONDUIT AS REQUIRED) SIZE ~ VALMONT PART ~802605 REQUIRE ENGINEERING APPROVAL. PER LOCAL TEL CO. 6-~, . , 4" MIR TO SECONDARY ELECTRIc MTS PART ~N/A ~ INSTALL DRIP LOOP ON ANTENNA ' ' 12" MIR TO PRIMARY ELECTRIC WE40002 ROHN PART CABLES AT BOSOM OF ~RN-WB-KS11 O- 15B TOWER/MONOPOLE. BENDINO VALMONT PART ~802604 ~ RADIUS PER MANUFACTURER'S MTS PART ~MT-C8269 STANDARDS DETAIL e UNDERGROUND DETAIL PICAL UTILI TRENCH ELEVATED ICE BRIDGE DETAIL CONDUIT STUB-UP OUTLINE OF REAR OF NOKIA ~BCCH/GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO ULTRASITE POWER CABINET~ ~ /CABLE SUPPORT RACK ~ EXISTING MONOPOLE ~ ANTENNA COIL 1'-6" FOR T1 CABLE AND ~ ~JUMPER TERMINATION AT 2'-6" FOR A~RM CABLEI ~ ~NOKIA EQUIPMENT~ FS' 0" MAX NEW HANGER .... ~MCPA -,, [ ~ ~~ - ' BRACKETS~~~ ~ ~ F " ~ 3/4 FLEX ~ ~ ~ ~(2)-1/2"¢ E911 COAX ~ /FROM ~ST / ~ CONDUIT~ ~ IF / JUMPERS ~ /SUPPORT TO ' VDC ~0~ ..... ~ / NOKIA / ~COAX ~ I"~''~' '~'~'1 ~A. UA "q minTA ~BTS NAIBMA BT~%' / / I LMFC AT 24VDC ~% /EQUI,~MENT ~ WEATHER- ~~1111~11 Il llUIll ~ I I1~11 I ' N o~oI / o ~ °l UNISTRUT RACK PIGTAIL ~IFC°Ax ~ PROOFING II1~11~11 II~l~llll III1~11111 IIUIIIII II Illlll II ~ I / ~ AS REQUIRED FOR = '-5%~ SUPPORT, ~ . 3'-0" : CABINET, IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII '. iiiiiiiiii II i~Ulllll II II- ~ ~~ ~ POWER TO DROP II.SUPPORT ~ : ' SUPPORT II,DDRBT-NEW ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ =SS A~RM =P' ~ °~IPII PROOFING ~ANTENNA CABLE II o~..~,,. ~ EQUIPMEN- IIIIIIM~MI~II~II II IIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIII II III dllllllllll IIIII IIIII CABLE TO IIII ii,~A~ ~ ~=~ ~ 9OOBTS ~= = ~MAIN COAX ~N. GRAD ~ --' ~' ~¢ ~, BY ARRANGEMENT CONTRACTOR -~ ~ABLE PORT/ ~2 AWG GREEN ~¢~,,,,~¢~a= g*,~ GROUND L ~ GROUND LEAD TO COAX ; ORFE~ / / / CONNECTOR PAIR ¢mm..,~ ~D~ HANDHOLE -- INSULTED (RT] ~,,~ ....... '~' ~~--GROUND BAR ED (R~) / / / ~ WEATHERPROOFED ..... / ~ GROUND ~IT WITH WEA F UNISTRUT 1 5/~8" CHANNEL WEATH CABLE SUPPORT ~A~ COAX~ BOLTING HARDW,'ARE AT ALL GROUND RING SECTION CONNECTIONS A, ND BASE ~ ICE BRIDGE AT OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS A ~ SCALE, ~/4" = ~'-0" FORMED STRUT CHANNEL)~ SCALE, 5/8"=f-0" ~ ~%77~.. ~c ~mo~CT ~o! CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ~ 04/2,/~ ISSUED FOR CONSTRU~ION GHM ALF "" ~N;'~,$~ } ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS vo~cg: 63]48~-8450 ~ ~]-~¢-~¢~ ORIENT POINT, N Y. ~ 1 95 7 PARAMUS, NJ 07652 HAWTHOENB,~ 10¢32 I NYCENY1 059 sc~E. ~s .OT~ ~S,~,E~ ~,*w. ,~. LV~V~ ~ 24897 NY7520 A-4 6 5 4 3 2 :',' ' PART # QTY. WE40001 ROHN PART #RN-WB-KS11 O-13B VALMONT PART #802603 MTS PART #N/A WB40002 ROHN PART #RN-WB-KS110-15B VALMONT PART #802604 MTS PART #MT-C8269 (~ EZBFo I II ~ *- STACK ~ , ~, LUCENT CDMA MODULAR CELL 4.OB OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT ~ BATTERY ,6 .~ ,' CABINET m CABINET SUPPLIED BY CARRIER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. ~' / ~c~ 2' 11" NOTE: / SCREENED LOUVERS FOR ,~ / '(2) CABINETS TO BE LUCENT CDMA MODULAR CELL 4.OB ,,' TELCO COMPARTMENT ~ .-° '~- I I I I iOUTDOOR BASE STATION CABINETS SUPPLIED BY METROPCS, ~ r,o AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABINET PLAN@ PPCBOX i i o o~ MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE $052-H32 ALUMINUM L ' I I INI- uRMATION. POWDER COAT FINISH ~ 2'-6" .~ _~_1'-0"~1~ ' / ~3 SPECIFICATIONS: TYPE 5R OUTDOOR i 'x / ? 72" TALL x .35.4" WIDE x 40" DEEP I ~o :~::~ :~i 4 ~ CELL CAPACITY: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT ENCLOSURE %~_ ' ~ ~o WEIGHT: 1090 LBS AC, (10 CARRIERS) NEW 'TRANSTECTOR SYSTEMS, · ,- CONFIGURATIONS: INC.' PYV 1101-781 200 120VAC GFI o 2'-5 9/16" A. SECTORS 5,4 AND 6 '- -~ ~- B. CARRIERS 1-11 CARRrERS AT 3 SECTORS 120/240 200AMP POWER PROTECTED I ' '~ ~ , I CDMA CHANNEL CARD CAPACITY: 12 SLOTS; CMU IVB TELCO CABINET (PTC) CONVENIENCE '-~ ~ -'~i CAPABLE OUTLET '~. . NOTE: ! = CPS ANTENNA: YES '~ 0 (2) CABINETS TO BE ALCATEL-LUCENT EZBFo (~ (~]) ~ CABINET ACCESS: FRONT ACCESS I ~:~:~ STACKABLE BATTERY CABINETS SUPPLIED BY '1 ELECTRIC REQUIRED: () ~ SCREENED ~:=~'== METROPCS, AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. ' ¼~ A. 3 CARRIER/5 SECTORS 3494 W % ~, LOUVERS REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS 'l B. 6 CARRIER/3 SECTORS 6821 W ~ ~ FOR TELCO ( AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. C. 11 CARRIER/3 SECTORS 10026 W ~ ~ COMPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS: B" ;~ MINIMAL ANTENNA CONFIGURATION: 2 ANTENNAS/SECTOR ~ ~:~ 70.8" TALL x 51. WIDE x 31.5" DEEP ~o~:. WEIGHT: WITHOUT BATTERIES - 636 LBS ~::~. FULLY EQUIPPED 2628 LBS PLAN @ EQUIPMENT CAB. ~ ~ , , /,il # OF SHELVES: 6 TOP SOLAR SHIELD NEW CALV. STEEL I_~.. ......................... ' ...... I ~~ BATTERY (Ah): 100 (Ah) Q~ AiR 2' 11-3/8" PER BATTERY WEIGHT: 85 LBS. FILTER ~'~ GRATING ATOP DUNNAGE ~ CAPACITY: 1200 (Ah) I'I "n COVER~' u II ,~ ~ II II ~ COOLING: FAN COOLED :, ,: ~;r~ ~ ~ ~ 1 PTC CABINET SHALL BE MOUNTED TO ~o r"ii:i~ XX~~ T--1 STEEL GRATING WITH 1/2"¢ H.S. -- 4"-- BOLTS AND SADDLE CLIP FASTENERS. ~,,, . (; ,, ~SOUND , LA CH ' TYPICAL POWER TELCO CABINET (PTC) DETAILS NTYPICAL BATTERY CABINET DETAILS..... MUFFLER I R TYP. ANTENNA CABLES UNISTRUT SUPPORT ~ o N SECURED TO NEW DUNNAGE RAiLiNG\ I ~ T TYP. GPS UNIT MODEL # GPS-C AS MANUF. BY KATHREIN .... \ ~ I TYP. ANTENNA CABLES SEE SHEET A 9 \ FOR MORE INFORMATION- \ \ ~ NEW UNISTRUT P-lO00 WILL BE ~ \ ~ SECURED TO NEW DUNNAGE RAILING~ ~ \ ~ TYP. EQUIPMENT CABINETS ~ ~\~ /~3'-0" MAX. SEE DETAIL 4/A-4a FOR ~ ~ \~ ~-LINE OF NEW /FROM LAST MORE INFORMATION ~,~ ~ ~ ~ /HANDRAIL BEYOND. /SUPPORT TO ' c SEE DETAIL 2/A-7. 8" LUCENT / PR~ROOFING ~_~ ~/,, FEQUIPMENT ._ ,_,, ~ _. ,,,, ~ ~ ' 1/2" dUMPER ..~; ........ L.-..-..~ ...'. \ \ ~ ! , ;,,,° REQUIRED J . , / /MIN. / I RT -COAX: II, i i~ , DROP I :~ CONNECTOR ~ ,, ~ * zllll~ WITH EQU,,BENT ~ LUCENT t ~lla WEATHER- DUNNAGE \I i '"'=' CABINET, '~ II II PROOFING ~' TYP' nnnn ,L [..~ Ii JI,-MAIN COAX GROUND LEAD TO COAX GROUND BAR-- ~ / GROUND KIT WITH WEATHER PROOFING (NOT / /-COAX 3'-2" /CONNECTOR / ' f F R 0 2' 4" 3'-2" SUPPORT TYP. /-NEW ~-SUPPORT IEQUIPMEI T FRAME PLATFORI .. .............................. ,a ~ ~ · - UNISTRUT ~CK AS REQUIRED I / D DUNNAGE o LEAVE 5' PIGTAIL FOR EACH DROP i % LUCENT CABINET, TYP. I CABLE SUPPORT FOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS ?,,TYPICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS A  SCALE, 5/4" = 1'-0" ~ S£ALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" IN BEND OF COAX) ~~~" YFC PROJECT NO CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. ~ ~,,,/ AND me~ro~CS, WILLIAM F. COLLINS, A[A NYCENY1059 / kl- 1059 .~ . ~., , A R c n ] T ~ c z s, ~ ~ P NY7320 WIRELESSWIRELESS~ INC. ~/~/~ ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS IO-I TEC~OL~Y D~VE SETAU~T. NY 11733 40200 MAIN RD NEW ClNGU~R WIRELESS PCS, LLC. 5 SKYLffiE DR. ~o. OAT[ R~ISIONS By C,~ ~'P~ dOB NO. Sire NO DRAWlNO NUMBER REV lfi ~ST MID,ND AVENUE voice 63~-689-a4s0 ~. 63~-68o-s4s9 ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 v,~*uus, NJ 07852 HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 I NYCENY1059 sc~: *s ,o~= =~s~,~o ~, s~, tv/*w 24897 NY7320 A-4~ 3 6 5 4 ~ k 5 2 o~,=~vD ~o,o~} ~wo 22 x 34 "~'~c,SEE: ~1 TYPICAL WOVEN WIRE FENCING NOTES · x TOP BRACE RAIL POST c, ,,o'-o" ,, O.C. ~ TOP RAiL TOP RAIL 1. (INSTALL FENCINO PER ASTM F-567, TERMINAL AND?/x]x STRECHER BAR ---STRECHER BAR SWING GATE PER ASTM F- 900) CORNER 2. GATE POST. CORNER, TERMINAL OR PULL POST SHALL POSTS)' ~: -- ' BE 2 7/8"¢ SCHEDULE 40 FOR CATE WIDTH OF 4 GATE LATCH , ~y: ~.> ~ ~ WITH LOCK ~ FEET PER ASTM-F1083. 3. LINE POST: 2-3/8"¢ SCHEDULE 40 PiPE PER >, ASTM-F1083. ~: '*'/ '%¢x~ =o GATE FRAME~_~Lm ~ Gl 4. GATEAsTM_F1085.FRAME: 1 1/2"¢ SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ~ o ' x I ~:= ~ I ~ I .... ~ 1 ~ ~ 5. TOP RAIL & BRACE RAIL: 1 1/4"¢ SCHEDULE 40 ~ ' ~ DIAGONAL ~ PIPE PER ASTM-F1085. ~ ~ ~ x , ROD/W 6. FABRIC: 11 GA. CORE WIRE SIZE 2" MESH, ~ '~ ~ , ~ DIAGONAL ROD/W STEEL// CONFORMING TO ASTM-A592 C~SS 1. ~ -., , , ~, ¢ , ¢ ' / STEEL TURNBUCKLE TURNBUCKLE 7. TENSION WIRE: 7 GA. GALVANIZED STEEL. ~ DIAMOND ~ :*,* % ,:= ~ /./ ~ . // _~ ' 8. TIE WIRE: MINIMUM 11 GA GALVANIZED STEEL INSTALL ' ~~S A SINGLE WRAP TIE WIRE AT POSTS AND RAILS AT ~ ' INTERVALS. ~NSTALL HOG RINGS ON TENSION ~ ' MAX. 24" , , INTERVALS. , I WIRE AT 24" OUTSIDE ~ ~ ,,,~ '' , LINE POST ~ ' ~¢~ / ~ ION ~~ ~ '-1 9. GATE ~TCH: 15/8" O.D. PLUNGER ROD W/ ~ MUSHROOM ~PE CATCH AND LOCK (KEYED ALIKE FOR x/ ALL SITES OR COMBINATION AS SPECIFIED BY AWS). : ~ ~ 10. LOCAL ORDINANCE OF BARBED WIRE PERMIT ~<~ ~11. . EI~PoRTiON OF PiPE . = . ~1 ~ ~ ~ OR GROUNA~E ~ oRFINISHGRouNDGR'ADE 11. DIMENSIoN.HEIGHT = VERTICAL + BARBED WIRE VERTICAL ~ ~ . ' ~' EMBEDDED IN ~ ~ I ~ ~1 1/2" MAX 12. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE PROJECT ~ , ~ ~ SPECIFICATIONS. .I CONCRETE SHALL ,. ~ ~ CLEARANCE FROM ~PORTION OF PIPE ~ ~1., ' ~ cuTBE PAINTED BACK WITH · ~ ~GRADE L~ "I ~ ~ '. EMBEDDED' IN " :~;-;- ' ~ ASPHALT PANT, ~ :~_ % ~PORTION OF PiPE CONCRETE SHALL ~-I '1~ ~p.~~ ~' ' 7' 7" ~ ' -- EMBEDDED IN BE PAINTED WITH 2"b ~ ELEVATION ( SECTION ~ CONCRETE SHALL CUT BACK BE PAINTED WITH ASPHALT PAINT SECTION 1 CUT BACK DETAIL WOVENASPHALT PAINT TAIL WOVEN WIRE FENCE DETAIL FENCE DETAIL WOVEN WIRE GATE DETAIL (~,R~ NOTES: >''* SET SHRUBS AT ORIGINAL "- xo ~' '¢, ~,¢ '~x >, DEPTH. SHRUB SHALL BE SET ~¢5~?F'}u ,- ,,4'.f, :¢,/~'-~ :,/',' <8,r~ ~ PLUMB REMOVE TIES AND . WRAPPING AROUND TREE , ,:/~,, TRUNKS AND TWINE FROM '¢x'~".~ AROUND TOP OF ROOT BALL. ~, , c LEAVE BURLAP IN P~CE AND '~'~{}'"" 4'-o"ARBORVITIESo.c. NIGRA ~ ~: >,q:~,~, NEWAMERiCAN1~ TALLARBORViTAE(MINIMUM) ROLL BACK 1/5 (REMOVE, ~ ~¢f,~,> UNLESS BIODEGRADABLE). >, ,u,,¢, EVERGREEN TREES '-' ~ P~NTED AT ~4'-0" O.C. ."."~, ~'~:'~'~r~ >~ (GUARANTEE TREES FOR A . .... SHRUB WRAP (50% ~- - ,,, -~ PERIOD OF ONE YEAR) '' :~ ,~-" OVER-~P) UP TO FIRST r>:'-~ ~ BRANCH "': :-'- ' . '~4" DEEP SHREDDED , ,>,~- FINISHED ~ ,,: GRADE E{¢ ,:, ¢;~ ROLL BACK ' ":'" '[ ~ ~'"'~'~ BACKFILL TOPSOIL -.- .- ~ · ~ . ."'-~ P~NT SCHEDULE: ~ ~/'t ?-': :S:' :'-"d : '-: MIXTURE W~TH TIME SUBSOIL~ . RELEASE FERT. TABLETS QUANTI~ KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING PURCHASE SIZE ,, P NT SCHEDULE DETAIL4' 12' 0" HiGH 40 AN A~BORVIT~E~ NIG~A AMERICAN A~BO~VITA[ ~F "" ~Z )~?4/i ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS W [ ~ L ] A M F. C O L ~ I N S, A 1 A ~ o~/~4/o~,ssu~o ro~ CO"STRUCTIO" 40200 MAIN RD NEW ClN6U~R WIRELESS PCS, LLO. ¢ SK~ ~R. ~o. OATE R~msmoNS 8~ C~ ~P'O ~~~ JOB NO. SmTE NO. DnAwINO NUMBER VOICE: 631-689-8450 F~ 631-689-~59 ORIENT POINT.N.Y. 1 1957 PARAMUS, NJ 07652 HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 [ NYCENY1 059 SCALE: AS NOTED DESIGNED D~WN BY: LY/AVJ ~~' 24897 A 5 5 -~-¢ NY7320 · ,ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE~ TOP CAP, BY OTHERS ANTENNA MFG.: ANTENNA MOUNT TMA KATHREIN MFG.: KATHREIN ~ANTENNA MOUNTING PART NO.: 800-10121 PART NO.: INCLUDED BRACKETS BY OTHERS, =P'* ~ GROUNDING LUG ~ I Nil ~ 0 5/16':. 5. 7/~:' IN CONTACT ~l ANTENNA MOUNTING ~1 IFC~~DETAIL $ =' WITH UNPAINTED % BRACKETS TO BE / ~ ~ _~/ ~ ~BULKHEAD, BY =-- PORTION IN 1% ~ '' TOP HINGE ~~ ANTENNA MOUNTING ~ ~,~ GROUNDING STRAP C~MPS =P' ~ ~ - ~~ ~ ~%LM8 BOLT HORIZONTAL AND NUT ~ ANTENNA ~ ~ / 5" O.D. MAST ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ANTENNA MOUNTING ~ FRONT SIDE , // ' ~ . I ~ ~SP~DER F~NOE BY ~ NOTES: OTHERS 1. TMA IS A WEATHERPROOFED ENCLOSURE RATED TOlP65. 2. TMA SHALL NOT BE PAINTED. A ~BEL STATING'DO NOT PAINT" IS PROVIDED WITH  TMA AND SHALL BE MOUNTED ON UNiT WHERE fT IS CLEARLY VISIBLE. ~ NOMINAL 5. IF POSSIBLE, TMA SHALL BE MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA TO ANTENNA MOUNTINO ~1~ DIA. (IN.) 18 MINIMIZE WIND LOADING ON STRUCTURE. BRACKETS TO BE ~¢, 180~ET~IO 4. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT LENGTH OF JUMPER TO ALLOW FOR PROPER P~CED AS NEEDED~ T '"'r BET~IL~TE~OM~TI~6P~TES MAXIMUM WIND APPLICATION OF WEATHER PROOFING AT ANTENNA AND TMA CONNECTIONS. ~ ~ %'~ SO~bE=~.T.8. LOAD (MPH) 100 ~ 5. BOND TMA GROUND STUD TO OROUNB BAR WITH NO. 6 AWO MATING F~NGE FRONT SIDE GROUND WIRE AND 2-HOLE GROUND LUG. COAX THICKNESS (IN.) 2.5 CABLES 10 5/16" 6. BACKP~TE AND POLE C~MPS FOR MOUNTING TO 2 5/8" DIA. ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE PROVIDED WITH TMA. VIEWA [~ QUANTI~A~ACHMENT BOLT 6 ~ ~ ~ FOR NOTE: ANTENNA MOUNTING ~ 7. TMA SHALL BE MOUNTED VERTICALLY.  ~ 8. WEATHER PROOFING SHALL BE (~PE AND PART NUMBER) AS SUPPLIED A~ACHMENT BOLT m INFORMATION SEE DETAIL 1, OR RECOMMENDED BY CABLE MANUFACTURER AND APPROVED BY CONTRACTOR. BET~IL'B' ~ ~O~TI~6 ~TE DiA. (IN.) 1 ~ THIS SHEET. TO~ ~ 9. JUMPER CABLES SHALL BE SUPPORTED WITHIN 1 TO 2 FEET 80~E:N.T.S. ATTACHMENT BOLT OF CONNECTORS. LENGTH (IN.) 7 NOTE: I NOTE: PICAL CINGU R ANTENNA DETAIL TOWER MOUNT AMPLIFIER MOUNTING (TMA) DETAIL 1.POLE WEIGHTS ARE APPROXIMATE AND ONLY INCLUDE FOR ANTENNA iNFORMATION SEE DETAIL 2, THIS SHEET.~ SCALE: 1"= 1'-0"~ SC~LE,N.TS THE WEIGHT OF THE STEEL POLE. THEY DO NOT REFLECT THE WEIGHT WITH ANTENNAS AND CABLES. 2.PRIOR TO FABRICATION OF THE MATING F~NGE, VERI~ NOTES: WITH MANUFACTURERS ITS DIAMETER AND THICKNESS. ~ ~GPS ANTENNA NOTE: 1.MHA IS A WEATHERPROOFED ENCLOSURE RATED TO IP65. '-~ SURVIVAL WIND SPEED: 2. BOND TMA GROUND STUD TO GROUND BAR WITH NO. 6 -1 ~1 1/4" NOMINAL 120 mph (200 KPH) AWG GROUND WIRE. PICAL ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL = ;. SU ,C, NT L NOT, TO *LLOW SCALE'N.T.S. ~~ACTUAL O.D.) X 2' 0" PROPEm APPLICATION OF WEATHERPROOFING AT ANTENNA ._~~_~ MAX. SCHEDULE 40 AND MHA CONNECTIONS. UNISTRUT PIPE~CONDUIT ~ - ~ GALVANIZED STEEL 4. IF POSSIBLE, TMA SHALL BE MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA C~MP Pl119 OR~ 4'-0" MAX. MOUNTING PIPE TO MINIMIZE WIND LOADING ON STRUCTURE. RECOMMENDATIONS //t ~ PiPE CAP (=P) ~ UNIVERSAL PIPE ~, ~~COAXIAL JUMPER A~ BOLT TORQUE / ~ ADAPTER K~T PART CABLE TO ANTENN 5 1/2" O.D. POST / ~ UNISTRUT PIOOI~ALV) /~NO. B1554 ~ ~METAL STRAP ~ COAX CABLE ~ ~/ TO BE ~ PROVIDED BY - ~4 ~EXISTING GALVANIZED oo~ SUBCONTRACTOR, ~ ~ ~ 5"¢ SCH.40 PIPE (OALV) STEEL PIPE ~ SIDE ELEVATION "A" II _c ~cE_ _5"¢ RGS CONDUIT (:OALV) (~p)~MHA~ : c NOTES: II ~GROUND SCREW ~ ~ 1.LOCATION OF ANTENNA MUST HAVE CL~R VIEW OF ~ ~ ~ -'~ II/ ~GROUND WIRE ~ E UNISTRUT P1001 (GALV) SOUTHERN SKY AND CANNOT HAVE ANY BLOCKAGES EXCEEDING 25% OF THE SURFACE AREA OF A I~ / TO ANTENNA E HEMISPHERE AROUND THE GPS ANTENNA. ~ / GROUND BAR, =- =ALLA =NNA LOCAT,ON, TO NO= UNISTRUT P1001 (OALV) RECEIVE CLEAR SIGNALS FROM A MINIMUM OF FOUR ~ (4) SATELLITES. VERI~ WITH HAND HELD GPS ~ )--COAXIAL JUMPER J : BEFORE FINAL LOCATION OF GPS ANTENNA. ~CABLE TO MAIN ~ ~-- COAX ~ ~., .., FINISHED GRADE ~. ~ 5.THE WEIGHT OF THE ANTENNA MOUNT IS 6.5 LBS. ',' ~ ~ ~ ;j.. '.,~ ~ ~ ~ ANTENNA "/'] ~ N.I h. ~RONT MOUNTING riPE, ~ SAKRETE PIER ~SCALE, 1" =1'-0" I - ' SCALE~N,T,S, A ~WFCPROJECTN( CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC.  WILL1AM F. COLLINS, AIA NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 $ 05/27/09 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION GHM ALF A ~ c ~ i · g c y s, g L ~ NY7320 WlRELES$~ lNG, & o~/~/o.,ssu~o rd. co.sr.uc~,o. ~., ,c~ ,, )0 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILS ~ 04/27/06 iSSUED FOR CON'RUCTION AVJ ALF NM I0-1 TEC~OLOGY DRIVE SETA~T, NY 1t733 ~0200 MAIN RD NEW ClNGU~R WIRELESS PCS, LLC. 5 SKYLINE DR. No. BATE R~ISIONS BY CHK APP'D JOB NO, SITE NO DRAWING NUMBER REV 15 ~ST MID'ND AVENUE vo~c[ ~14s¢-s4~o tax: ¢~t-~s~-s4¢¢ ORIENT POINT, N.Y, 1 195~ PARABUS, NJ 07652 HAWTHORNE. NY 10532 [ NYCENY1059 SC~E AS NOTED DESIGNED BRAWN "~. CY/*W 24897 NY7520 A 6 PSC = NOMINAL DIA. (IN.) 18 MAXIMUM WIND LOAD (MPH) 100 MATINO FLANGE THICKNESS (IN.) 2.5 ATTACHMENT BOLT QUANTITY 6 ATTACHMENT BOLT DIA. (IN.) 1 ATTACHMENT BOLT 7 LENGTH (IN.) STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE FABRICATED AND ERECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AISC SPECIFICATIONS. ALL NEW REMOVABLE STRUCTURAL STEEL BEAMS CONFORM TO ASTM A-56 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL MATERIALS TO BE HOT DIPPED HANDRAIL GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. BEAMS THAT ARE SHOWN TO BE TOO LONG TO HOT-DIP GALVANIZE MAY BE SPLICED NEW 4"xl/4" 2. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E7OXX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AISC AND AWS D1.1. STEEL HANDRAIL TO BE WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC "MANUAL OF (4) NEW 5/8"¢ ~ ~. WELDED TO 6"x6"xS/8" 6'-0" 1'-6" STEEL CONSTRUCTION". ALL DAMAGE TO GALVANIZED COATINGS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH COLDSPRAY GALVANIZING. BOLTS EACH SIDE,~. ~ GALV. STEEL PLATE ,, MAX. ,3. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A,325 BEARING TYPE (5/4"¢)CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO TYP'~ ~ N 90' LIGHT WT MAX. , o>~ BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NICH 1 1/2"¢ STANDARD ELBOW 4. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/8" DiA. ASTM A 507 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED 1 1/2"x5/16" ~ ~ ~'~/~/11/4" PIPE%k~'k~%-"~" ~, ,,%/~-~ /-- OTHERWISE.CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHORS AND EPOXY ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GALVANZED ~ ~ ~ ~/ APPROPRIATE POST PLAN MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S SERRATED STEEL ~ : ~ , RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE OUT WITHOUT GRATINg", ~~ ~ ~MOUNTINO ' PRIOR ENGINEERING APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING i NEW 12"x6"xS/8" GALV. STEEL HANDRAIL CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. CONCRETE EDGE ! , ~ /SPLICE (AS I DISTANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING INSTAL~TION. ' ',, DUNNAGEP~TE WELDED TO STEEL 4,, x 1/4" STEEL I /REQUIRED) 5. STRUCTURAL STEEL BEAMS ARE DESIGNED FOR AN EXTREME FIBER STRESS OF 24,000 PSI FOR COMPACT AND 22,000 ~ ~ TOE P~TE " ' ' PSI FOR NON-COMPACT SECTIONS. ~~ ~ , I~-'-~TOE ~BOARD 6. ALL WELDING TO BE DONE BY CERTIFIED WELDERS. PROVIDE COPIES OF THE WELDER'S CERTIFICATE TO ~' P~TFORM L[NE~ /SPLICE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. * fi~ 1/4" ,~ 7. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH FABRICATION AND ERECTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO THE ~ -'~ ~ ~ , ~ ', ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL AT GENERAL CONTRACTOR COST. THE REVIEW OF SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A COMPLETE CHECK BUT WILL INDICATE ONLY THAT GENERAL METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION AND DETAILING ~ 1/4" IS SATISFACTORY. REVIEW OF SUCH DRAWINGS WILL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE RESPONSIBILI~ FOR ERRORS OF FABRICATION WHICH MAY EXIST AS THE DIMENSIONS AND DESIGN OF ADEQUATE CONNECTIONS. CONTRACTOR ~ / SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILS AND THE CORRECT R~ING OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. NEW GALVANIZED STEEL HANDRAIL ELEVATION HANDRAIL MOUNTING DETAIL EQUIPMENT P TFORM ACCESS STAIR ~ ~ SCALE' 1/2"=1' 0" ~ NEW 2'-0"¢ POURED ~ ~ SCALE: 1 / 4 ~CONCRETE SONOTUBE x x  GALVANIZED SERRATED 4x2 / STEEL GRATING 1 1/2" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL NEW 10"x10"xl/2" I !1 REPRESENTBASHED LINESNEw ~ / CHANNELsPIPE RAIL WELDED TO GALVANIZED STEEL/ W14X22 BEYOND, ~P'~~I- :, NOTE //// / % WPICAL SERRATED P~TE WITH (4)12" I NEW lO"xlO"x1/2" ~+11~ NEW W14x26 LONG ~4 REBAR EACH, , i i II <~ ~, mu,b: ~ // / STEEL TREADS BOLTED I I WELDED TO BOSOM OF ~ GALVANIZED STEEL P~TE REFER TO STRUCTURAL FRAMING P~N// / ......... , +11+, ~ AND NOTES DETAIL 1, THiS SHEET. - P~TE PROVIDE 2" -- SECURED WITH (4) 12" L ,l_J ~/ HOOK, ~P. OF (4)~ ToLONGBo~OM~4 REBARoF P~TEWELDED ~~~ ~( = ~_ I ~ I L4X4XS/16 CLIP ANGLE / / / ~ NICHOLS 1-1/2"x3/16" 1" NON-SHRINK / II ,1~ II ii // // / // GALVANIZED SERRATED Il ~)] ~ [L~-II STEEL GRATING 2'-0"¢ POURED / ~"lk=~=~=Efll CONCRETE SONOTUBE / II ' ~ Il ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CONCRETE AT 28 DAYS, / /.11 ~ II x x ~ ~ ~ AiR ENTRAINED) ~ ~ (6) ~4 REBARS ~ fill ~ *" Illl '" 12 16 BEYOND J WlOx'2 ' ' I 1-1/2"' 'x 5/16" HOT IIII IIII ~ // ~ ~/~__ ~ ~(2) 5/4"¢ BOLTS .... DIPPED GALVANIZED 12" -- STEEL SERRATED GRATING. O.C. II II ~ ~ I ~ H II ~~ ~ I WlOxl 2 [ II Il [ ~ II ( ttI~Ii -- ~ C10x15.3 ....... i IL __ _ II I 0 i II II I I II II I 0 ~= ~ LINE OF GRADE / ...... W14x26 / ~ I II II I z / 5/16"=1'-0" T~ L J ,, fl" 6T ~ 11"=5' 8" NOTE: ., ~ ~ STRUCTURAL FRAM,NG p~N IF THIS SHEET IS 11" X 17" REFER ~ P,ER DETA, L ~ SECT'ON ~ STEEL ACCESS STA'R TO ADJACENT GRAPHIC SCALE. NORTH SCALE: 1"=1'-0" SCALE: 1"=1' 0" SCALE: 5/8"= 1 '-0" ~ .. - ~ CFC PROJECT NO CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT cin lular me~:ro .,,,,. ,,...,co,,,.o,,o. _ ,[, ,.~¢:~¢~ .,,,~,,.,,.,,,,~ 05 6478 AND metroPCS, LLC. ~ NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 ~ o,/,,/~ ,,~.~ ~o, oo.,~,.c~,o. ~..~ ..~7~ ~.~.~-~, ~~ WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ~ 0~/~/~ ,ssu~ ~o, :o.~,u~,o. ~..~ .~.[~/Z~)~/~E ~ CINGULARNOTEsSTRUCTURALAND DETA[LsFRAMING P~N, A . c . ~ · ~ C ~ s, ~ ~. NY7320WIRELESS WIRELESS, mC. ~ 04/27/06 iSSOEO FOR CONSTRU~ION AVJ ALFNM ~''~~ ( We NEW ClNGU~R WIRELESS PCS, ~C. sc~., ~ ~o~6~ ~s~..~. ~w. ~ ~/*w 24897 NY7520 A'-7 PSC= >~ RAIL :E (AS IRED) BOARD :g STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: ~ 2'-6 1/2" 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE FABRICATED AND ERECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT.~:~=F--GPS UNIT MODEL # GPS-C ,, AISC SPECIFICATIONS. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL BEAMS CONFORM TO ASTM A-56 UNLESS ,~ I AS MANUF. BY KATHREIN 18-5/8" OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL MATERIALS TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION.~ ~SAFETY CAP BEAMS THAT ARE SHOWN TO BE TOO LONG TO HOT-DIP GALVANIZE MAY BE SPLICED DEVELOPING FULL STRENGTH OF MEMBER DESIGNED BY STEEL FABRICATOR. 2. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING ETOXX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL I ~ 42 MM O.D. SCHEDULE 40 ~ALUMINUM CONFORM TO AISC AND AWS D1.1. WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, . I #2 AWO SOLID I / GALV. STEEL MOUNTING PIPE =~-- ~ ~ /SERRATED GRAB PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC "MANUAL OF STEEL 2 HOLE LUG-TYP. ~. i ~,- /~ -- / TINNED INSULATED T N BARS CABLE TO PIPE CONNEC I0 CONSTRUCTION". ALL DAMAGE TO GALVANIZED COATINGS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH COPPER GROUND o COLDSPRAY GALVANIZING. ~ WIRE TO MOB [TYP. I / BURDY TYPE GAR (TYP. 2 I AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL ORATING MAY USE 5/8" DIA. ASTM A 507 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHORS AND EPOXY __ ~ .~!.-~ I ~ALV. A-56 STEEL MOUNTING ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. STANDARD GALV. ~ ~ U~/ BRACKET PLATE 1/4" X I THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S U-BOLT FOR 2" DiA. ~..r:~ ~ / 4-1/4" X 16-1/4" LONG RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO PIPE W/ DOUBLE HEX ~-- REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR ENGINEERING APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES BOLTS & WASHER--~__~.~ ~ NOTE: ~ o ~_~ // IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE ~ PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. ~STANDARD GALV. U-BOLT INTERMEDIATE BRACKETc z I CONCRETE EDGE DISTANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING INSTALLATION. #2 AWG SOLID TINNED REQUIRED WHEN !FINISH iT, '- (~) 5. STRUCTURAL STEEL BEAMS ARE DESIGNED FOR AN EXTREME FIBER STRESS OF COPPER GROUND WIRE ~ / /' [ I [~(~RU ~IH/E~; BD~i~ sPIP~E W/ FLOOR TO TOP BRACKET 24,000 PSI FOR COMPACT AND 22,000 PSI FOR NON COMPACT SECTIONS. TO MOBL--~.~r"~' -~.j/i- -- WAsHBER T IS MORE THAN 10'-0'u_ 6. ALL WELDING TO BE DONE BY CERTIFIED WELDERS. PROVIDE COPIES OF THE WELDER'S CERTIFICATE TO ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. 2" DIA. MOUNTING GALV. GROUNDING KIT ON 1/2" (~) 7. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH FABRICATION AND ERECTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STEEL PiPE MOUNTED TO " COAX LINE TO GPS UNIT CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY: _ SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL AT GENERAL NEW HANDRAIL ~ / I (~) LADDER HEIGHT < -- o CONTRACTOR COST. THE REVIEW OF SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED ~ ~'~~d~ ~ ~: ~ ~- 5/16" 2" AS A COMPLETE CHECK BUT WILL INDICATE ONLY THAT GENERAL METHOD OF I I " ~' > WALL BRACKET CONSTRUCTION AND DETAILING IS SATISFACTORY. REVIEW OF SUCH DRAWINGS WILL \ \ COAX LINE TO EQUIP. (~ GRADE TO TOP OF PLATFORM b~ Ua X ALUM. NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS OF #2 AWO SOLID TINNED . BENDING RADIUS PER (~ LADDER WIDTH C '~ a_ FABRICATION WHICH MAY EXIST AS THE DIMENSIONS AND DESIGN OF ADEQUATE COPPER GROUND WIRE I MANUFACTURERS CONNECTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILS AND THE TO MOB~.~: / \ / RECOMMENDATIONS CORRECT FI~FING OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. \ / / #6 AWO STRANDED o INSULATED COPPER GROUND / / I / WIRE TO MOB us '~ < TYP. ALUMINUM TO MOB AT EQUIPMENT PLATFORM ~s SERRATED RUNGS _~ ~ ~/4" ¢ Typ. NEW 1'-6"¢ POURED METRO PCS CPS ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL CONCRETE SONOTUBE SCALE' 1"=1' 0" PIER, TYP. OF (4) ~ ( ~ NICHOLS 1-1/2"x3/1 6" ~ SECTION VARIES -- GALVANIZED SERRATED ~ / STEEL GRATING ~ //~x@ STEEL ACCESS STAIR ~ NEW GALVANIZED SYEEL NEW 10"x10"x1/2"/ I I ACCESS STAIR ~/~ DASHED LINES / I+~ NEW W10x22~ SCALE. 1"=1' 0" GALVANIZED STEEL~,¢/b REPRESENT NEW /: II : · ~ PLATE WiTH (4-) 12" ~ W12X16 BEYOND, TYP.~ ~L+ll+J ~,/' ' LONG #4 REBAR EACH, NEW 10"x10"x1/2" ~ jlt ~ / WELDED TO BOTTOM OF GALVANIZED STEEL PLATE ..... , -- ':-' 2 11/ PLATE PROVIDE 2" SECURED WITH (4) 12" .~ ~--~IT-'~"~--~ ' I I LONO #4 REBAR WELDED //. II % '1, I HOOK, TYP. OF (4) ~ o4c~ o4r~ TO BOTTOM OF PLATE / / 4'Il ii Jill ~ x x ~ / / ~.~ ~, : ANTENNA o o PROVIDE 2" HOOK ; ~ L o K ~ I -MFD: KATHREIN WERKE KG 1 NON-SHRIN / / IP ---~1 ~ ~ ~: / ' GROUT~ / iF '~-II -PART NO.: 800 10504 II I 1_1/2- x 3/16" HOT 1'-6"¢ POURED / dl ~ Jl., ~ I DIPPED GALVANIZED CONCRETE SONOTUBE / .]1 ~ II .I I ~. ~. ~ ~. STEEL SERRATED GRATING. PIER, (4000 PSI / -CI II ~ m. ~- m- r--- CONCRETE AT 28 DAYS, / / ii~ ~ It o I I I I I AIR ENTRAINED)~~ I~ II. (6) #4 REBARS ~ IIii IIII I " ~ #25,,REBAR TIES @ II II ( / 1 O.C. ~ II Ii .~ ~--,- __ I~===~i i I II II I u) F F ~' ~' ---IF q SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW ill ,Il a c.. 3/16"= 1'-0" /.-~ v-..."~ I ~-===~J I z NOTE: 6-5/52" STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLAN iF THIS SHEET IS11" X 17" REFERPIER DETAIL , 1' 6" . TO ADJACENT GRAPHIC SCALE. NORTH SCALE' 1"=1'-0" SCALE: 1"=1' O" TOPVIEW SCALE 5/8"= 1'-0" ~ - &'FC PROJECT NO ONGULAR WIRELESSPCS,LLC. metro ~, ,,~,. 05 6478 AND metroPCS, LLC. ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT z~ o,/~,/~ ,~,~o ~o. co~.~,o. NYCENY1059 /LI-10!59 metr0PCS STRUCTURAL FRAMINGPLAN, ~ ~ NOTES AND DETAILS WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, L L P NY7320 WIRELESS,INC. A I 40200 MAIN RD NEW CIRCULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. 5 SKYLINE DR, NO DATE REVISIONS BY CHK ^PP'D dOB NO SITE NO DRA~ REV VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631689-8459 ORIENT POINT,N.Y. 1195,7 PAR^MUS, NJ 07652 HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 SCALE: AS NOTEDIDESIGNED1DRAWN BY LY/AVJ 24897 NY7520NYCENY1059 5 6 5 4 ,5 2 . ~: NOTES: SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 200AMP, SINGLE PHASE, 120/240 VAC, 60HZ SERVICE FOR CINGULAR AND METROPCS SITES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WiTH UTILITY COMPANY BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. POWER AND TELEPHONE CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. FOR COMPLETE INTERNAL WIRING AND ARRANGEMENT REFER TO DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY PANEL MANUFACTURER. ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE N.E.C. AND UTILITY COMPANY AND LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SUFFICIENT LENGTHS OF LFMC INCLUDING ALL CONDUIT FITTINGS (NUTS, REDUCING BUSHINGS, ELBOWS, COUPLING, ETC) NECESSARY FOR CONNECTION FROM THE NEMA BOX TO THE INTERIOR ETS CABINET. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICE EQUIPMENT WITH FAULT CURRENT RATINGS GREATER THAN THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT FROM THE POWER UTILITY. POWER, CONTROL AND EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#14 AWG AND LARGER), 600V, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90'C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION; LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED. CUT, COIL AND TAPE A 5 FOOT PIGTAIL FROM END OF LFMC FOR TERMINATING BY ETS EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WiTH LOCAL TELCO UTILITY PRIOR TO PROCURING AND INSTALLATION OF SSC ENCLOSURE AND COMPONENTS. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL SURGE PROTECTION DEVICES (BY ATLANTIC SCIENTIFIC; ZONE BARRIER SERIES; PART NO. 90700 WITH MOUNTING DIN RAIL PART NO. 21607). BOND SURGE PROTECTION DEVICE DIN RAIL TO THE ENCLOSURE WITH #6 AWG INSULATED WIRE (REFERENCE STANDARD DETAIL 1015). BOND ENCLOSURE TO THE SiTE GROUND RING OR BAR WITH #2 AWG COPPER WIRE. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 6"x6"x4" (MIN.) NEMA 5R STEEL ENCLOSURE AND MOUNT TO CONDUIT RACK AT REAR OF CABINET. 24 VDC NOTES: 1. 24VDC CABINET iNSTALLER SHALL MAKE ALL FINAL TERMINATIONS AT 24VDC CABINET. 2. NOKIA INSTALLER SHALL MAKE ALL FINAL TERMINATIONS AT NOKIA ETS CABINET. F-NOTE 5. 24VDS CABINET MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL BRIDGE KIT FROM 24VDC CABINET TO NOKIA ETS CABINET. TO NEW CINGULAR E8 NEW METRO PCS METER AND ~IETRO PCS ELECTRICAL SERVICE NOTE: MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL DC POWER CABLES READY FOR FINAL TERMINATION BY NOKIA. DC DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT CABINETS~-~ DiSCONNECT,R 4. 24VDCcABLES SHALL BE (2)-3/0 AWG FOR EACH ETS. ~ NEW CINGUL~r<\ EXISTING PAD ELECTRICAL SERVICE IS DESIGNED BY A. ASSOCIATED CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR BC DISTRICUTION CABLES SHALL BE LEFI OPEN AND PROVIDED W/A REMOVABLE LOCKING NOTE I~ I [f METER AND \ MOUNTED DTHERS WITHOUT INVOLVEMENT OF WFC. E9~ ~ DISCONNECT~ \ TRANSFORMER-- 30NDUIT ROUTING SHALL BE SHOWN ON DEVICE OR TAG SO THAT THE BREAKER CAN NOT BE CLOSED. SURGE )PAWINGS. AN ELECTRICAL INSPECTION ~~ _r-/ ~---~-q~..~<-~'--NOTERREs'TOR :ERTIFIOATE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO 5. B. DC CABLES SHALL BE RHH/RHW AND CABLE TRAY (CT) RATED. NOTE ~ ~~'1 E4 ~ETROPCS AND WFC AT THE COMPLETION 6. C. NOKIA INSTALLER TO PROVIDE DC DISTRICUTION CABLES LUGS ON NOKIA END. E6~ I NOTE ~ [~ DF THE PROdECT. 7. 24VDC INSTALLER SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL TELCO CABLE(S) BELDEN PART #7919A COILED AND READY FOR FINAL TERMINATION ~ E4~ii~ii~=;:~:~..L.~NOTE B. FINAL24VDCTERMINATIoNMANUFACTURERBy NOKIA.SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL CDS DATACOM ALARM CABLE(S) PART #C0561007S COILED AND READY FOR NEO2TENgTEL NOT--~ I IIE3 9. ALL CONDUCTORS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED iN ACCORDANCE W/NEC AND LOCAL CODES. I-i iiii ALL CABLE ENDS AT THE NOKIA ETS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND TAPED. SUFFICIENT SLACK SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PERMIT NOKIA INSTALLER TO TERMINATE ALL CABLES. ( FOR NOKIA CABINET CONDUIT AND CABLE TERMINATION POINTS SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET A-4. <:~ 2-1/2" C WiTH 5-4/0 '40TE: <~ 2" C WITH 5-,5/0 &: 1 # 4 CU FOR CIRCUITS AND RATINGS SEE PANEL SCHEDULE, DETAIL 1 SHEET E-2 El. COORDINATE ALL NEW SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WITH LIPA PRIOR TO BEGINNING NEW WORK. E2. ENGAGE THE SERVICES OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING COMPANY TO LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT IN THE AREA. ED. PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW 120/240 VOLT 200 AMP SINGLE PHASE MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH. E4. PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW 120/240 VOLT SINGLE PHASE 200 AMP METER. ES. PROVIDE AND INSTALL NUMBER 2 COPPER GROUND AND ,5/4" X 10' GROUND RODS FOR NEW SERVICE. MAXIMUM RESISTANCE TO GROUND SHALL BE $ OHMS. PROVIDE AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL GROUND RODS NOT LESS THAN 6' APART TO MEET MINIMUM GROUND RESISTANCE AS NECESSARY. E6. NEW PANEL "A" IN WEATHERPROOF ENCLOSURE MOUNTED TO NEW EQUIPMENI- PLATFORM RAILING. PANEL RATED AT 200A, 42koic MAIN BREAKER, ALL COPPER BUS, ,50 BOLT ON 22koic BREAKERS AND DOOR IN DOOR HINGED CONSTRUCTION. E7. PROVIDE AND INSTALL SURGE EQUAL TO ARRESTOR SUPPLIED WITH SSC ENCILOSURE, EQUAL TO INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY INC., MODEL # PTE080. INSTALL WITH A 2P-30A BREAKER IN PANEL "A" WITH 5 # 10 CONDUCTORS. E8. PROVIDE AND INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKERS AND BRANCH CIRCUIT WIRING GFCI CONVENINENCE RECEPTACLES, 24 VDC CABINET ETC. PER PANEL "A" SCHEDULE. COORDINATE WITH PROdECI MANAGER AS NECESSARY. E9. PROVIDE NEW 200A, SINGLE PHASE, ,5 WIRE PIN AND SLEEVE EMERGENCY GENERATOR RECEPTACLE. PART # GRINWlRRELAY-RAND RECEPTACLE #AR20033-RS ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM /% CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. ; cingular metro ~ ~,Ox 05 6478 AND metroPCS, LLC. ORIENT BY THE SEA RESTAURANT NYCENY1059 /L1-1059 A o~/~,/o, ,,s.~ro. co.,~..cr,o* ~"" ~'~"" ~,~,¢/~j~.~/.~.,~_~/ ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM AND NOTES NY7320 WIRELESS WIRELESS, INC, 40200 MAI N R D NEW ClNGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. $ SKYLINE DP.. .0 DATE REVISIONS By CH[( APP'D %¥i /~'~ O~ ~44 ~.~..2~/ JOB NO. SITE NO DRAWING NUMBER REV VOICE 631-689-8450 FPD( 631-689-8459 ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 PARAMUS. Nd 07652 HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 SOSL£. ASNOTED IBE$IGNE8 [Dp~AwN By LY/AVJ . . 24897 NY7320NYCENY1 059 E 1 5 DFN=SR/[160,O2] OWO 22 X 54 "D" 6 5 4 3 2 E 0 NOTES FOR TE20B INTRUSION ALARM: AC DISTRIBUTION PANEL (]) (]) 1. DISCONNECT WIRE #22 FROM N.O. (OPEN~ / WHT/BLU F' '/ .... 1 ~-~ TERMINAL OF ST5 & CONNECT 240-120V 1 PHASE 200A BASED ON INTERSECT PANEL WITH STRIKESORB TVSS BLU/WHT ~L],/ .... 2 ' ''~ TO MALE 0.25" QUICK CONNECT (RED WIRE) FROM TE20B DOOR INTRUSION ALARM LOAD (VA) WHT/ORG~L]'/ .... 5 .... CABLE. USE PROVIDED FEMALE 0.25" QUICK ORG/WHT ~k] '/ ,, ' 4 ~ CONNECT BRKR L1 L2 ECL L1 L2 BRKR WHT/GRN Elk] ~, , 5 , , 2. NOW CONNECT THE BLACK WIRE FROM SIZE SiZE GRN/WHT I i Ir/ .... 6 , , THE TE20B DOOR REV SERVICE DESCRIPTION AMPS BRKR VA VA VA VA VA BRKR AMPS SERVICE DESCRIPTION REV ~" WHT/BRNI 1~7,~, , 7 , , INTRUSION ALARM CABLE TO THE N.O. O0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #1 50 31 (2P) 526 526 652 652 .326 ,326 42 (2P) .30 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #2 O0 o~ BRN/WHTI II I ~, , B , , OPEN TERMINAL OF ST5 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #5 50' 5 (2P) 526 652 .326 6 (2P)' .30 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #4 0 TO X9 ALPHA ~ ~ WHT/SLT ~'/ .... 9 , 0 7 526 652 ,326 8 0 ALARM PORT o SLT/WHTI ' ' / .... 10 ~ NA O0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #5 30 9 (2P)11 326 326 652 652 326 326 10 (2P)12 50 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #6 O0// ~o:~ BLU/REDRED/BLU I/~,~_~__[ I II ~' ' 12' ' NA 0 30 1,3 (2P) 326 652 .326 14 (2P), 50 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #8 0 ~o RED/ORGII INTRUSION (PRE-WIRED IN 24V) 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #7 15 526 652 526 16 0 ~ ORG/REDI I:~::~:~' ~ (LAC #1, TEXT ID #1) 0 50 17 (2P) 526 652 526 18 (2P) 50 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #10 0 G RED/GRN 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #9 19 526 652 526 20 0 ~ GRN/REDI ~ i 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #11 50 21 (2P) 526 1076 750 22 (2P) 15 0 0~. RED/ERR I , / -- -~ ~b] '~ ,(By_o_C)_ 0 25 .326 1076 750 24 NOKIA HETA 1900 0 ~ BRN/REDI 1~7~' /- 18%',~ ~ BLU)(ETVA~~lbXIS, ID #21) 0 15 25 (2P) 750 750 26 0 ~0 RED/SET I~ © 1~7~' ' 19~ NOKIA HETA 850 27 750 750 28 0 L,J~ ~ '~ NA 0 SET/RED 7-" ' 2O 0 15 29 (2P) 720 .3600 2880 50 (1P) 50 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET 0 z BLK/BLU~ '/" ~ '[=~k~___~ WHT 0 UMTS CABINET HEATER 51 720 720 52 0 o "~ COMM POWER FAIL (BY GC) ~ BLU/BLK I i I'/" ~~_~__ ORG2(EAC #5, TEXT ID #5) 0 TELCO BOX RECEPTACLE 15 ,3,3 (1P) 180 180 54 0 o~ BLK/ORG I i~,' ,~,x, '~'~ ~ ORG 0 UMTS CABINET RECEPTACLE ~5 55 (1P) 180 180 56 0 x t 0 BATTERY CABINET NO.2 15 ,37 (1P) 180 180 58 0 p ORG/BLKI I'/" ~ '~:= ~] YEL2(LAC #6, TEXT ID #6) 0 59 0 40 0 ~D BLK/GRN .... /~ .... ~ BRN RECT 24V - MAJOR (PRE-WIRED IN 24V) / ,, '~(EAC #7, TEXT ID #7) ~d GRN/BLK II I'/'~/~ "'.'~Z~ BLU -~ RECT 24V - MINOR (PRE-WiRED IN 24V) 0 41 0 42 0 ~n BLK/BRN I i,'/ ,~/~% ,~L] VIO "BATTERY ACTIVE (PRE-WIRED IN 24V) J z ~ < BRN/BLK I I IiI/ri' ~I I IX I~ ORY (LAC #8, TEXT ID #18) UJ ~' eLK/SET I I,/,~ 29 .... ,,I--~ < SET/BEE ' / '=== 30 .... ,, , NA v YEL/BLU I 1~7~=:= 31' '~ w 0 I I'/"=:= 32' R NA 0 z BLU/YEL II) PANELSCHEDULE ORC/YEL II I ~ === ,34' ~$~ ) NA SCALE. N.T,S. YEL/GRNEih]__ '/ '~== 55 .... N' GRN/YEL I I'/''~== 36 .... N' F I INA INTRUSION ALARMS '~ I I r, ,=== 57, ,, ~ , ~kI-2 JUMPER'D ' ' ABeREVIATIONS ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS [ I'===~== 38, ' ,'%~ ~L] NA TOGETHER I ~ BY ARGUS AND A AMPERE 0 AC GENERATOR CONNECTOR r i, ,=== 59, ,~ ~E~lT:~ i~)~_~:~.:~ 3 ROUTED TO PINS ACCA ANTENNA CABLE COVER ASSEMBLY NA 15,14 AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE · CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION BCW BARE COPPER WIRE ~ CIRCUIT BREAKER .... 42' '~ ~ NA uJ J ,OT O, OOAX,AL C^.L RO,,O ETS BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ~ KIT CONNECTION PRE-INSTALLED ×RED C CONDUIT TEMP ALARMS ELK I CIBGE COAX iSOLATED GROUND BAR EXTERNAL 0 COMPRESSION CONNECTION ,U PER'D -- POWER COMPARTMENT DWG DRAWING COPPER GROUND BAR TOGETHER AND RED HIGB/LOW TEMP AND ROUTED TO ELK BATTERY COMPARTMENT (E) EXISTING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ,/0 EXTENSIONhEEi~%=~ :;~ HIGH/LOW TEMP ALARMS EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING ~ DISCONNECT SWITCH BOARD BY ARGUS G GROUND REAR PANEL, BATT AND GEN GENERATOR (I]) GFI DUPLEX RECEPTACLE Lrll- ~ ~:= 49 '==~ POWER BAY ~-~ ,~=: 5o~%_~ GPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (~ GENERATOR ~NOT USED INTRUSION ALARMS OR GROWTH 0 0 0 IGR INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) (~) GROUND ROD'~ SCALE:N,T.S, I/i* BATTERY CABINETL~ N.C. ORG __ .~.-~NOTE .3 KWH KILOWATT HOUR [] GROUND ROD W TH AG°ESS LOW T MP ALAR OM ORO/WHT 3/ REDF MIGB MASTER ISOLATED GROUND BAR GROUND WIRING -, BLU ~ ' ALARM CABLE N.C. INTRUSION (N) NEW BATFERY CABINET [' N.O. -~ BACK ALARM P PHASE ~ MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH HIGH TEMP ALARM LCOM BLU/WHT ~ M I TO 66-ALARM /~ CABLE PCS PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM [] METER ON METER/BREAKER UNIT (. BLOCK ELK ELK COM TE20B PPC POWER PROTECTION CABINET RGS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL ~ PANELBOARD ~ S66M1-50 '-~ / BATTERY PRC PRIMARY RADIO CABINET POWER AND TELCO WIRING CABINET RWY RACEWAY SN SOLID NEUTRAL ~-REPRESENTS DETAIL NUMBER REF. NOTES: '~p/~-DRAWING NUMBER 1. MOUNT S66M1-50 BLOCK W/898 BRACKET IN TELCO BOX OR ON TELCO POWER COMPARTMENT SW SWITCH BACKBOARD OR IN NEW ,3R ENCLOSURE AT OUTDOOR SITES. REAR LIFT-OFF ACCESS TCB TOP GROUND BAR [~ TRANSFORMER 2. WIRE TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY WHEN CIIRCUIT IS NORMAL. /'" COM /~ N.O. PANEL INTRUSION TYP. TYPICAL /x V VOLT ~ XIT GROUND ROD 3. INSTALL BRIDGING CLIPS (SIEMON-SA-1-25 OR EQUIVALENT) AS REQUIRED. ALARM W WIRE 4. TURN BACK AND STORE UNUSED COND)UCTORS. : ST5 ~ SCALE: N.T,~ SCAL E: N.T.S. v  ~rC"ROUECT"O CINOULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. NYCENY1059 /El-10 59 A ~/~,/~ 'SSU~rO"CONST"UC~'ON C"" A~r N" ELECTRICAL DETAILS, SYMBOLS WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA~-- Z~ 04124/09ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION GH" ALi ""~ AND ABBREVIATIONS ^ R c . i T E ¢ T s, L L. NY7320 WIRELESS WIRIII$$ INC.A 04/27/06 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION AVJ ALF N~ IO-ITEC:-[NOLOGYDP-iVE SETAUI~BT, NYII733 40200 MAIN RD NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. 5SKYLINgDR. No. DATE REVISIONS By CHK APP'D JOB NO. SITE NO DRAWING NUMBER REV VOICE 631-689-8450 FAX 631-6898459 ORIENT POINT,N.Y. 1195)7 15 EAST MIDLAND AVENUE I PAP. AMUS, NJ 07652 HAWTHORN~,Nt' 10532 NYCENY1059 SCALE AS NOTED DESICNED DRAWN BY' LY/AVJ 24897 NY7520 E-2 3 6 5 4 Jk 3 2 ~)sR=s~vD ~o,o:] AC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 240-120V 1 PHASE 200A BASED ON INTERSECT PANEL WITH STRIKESORB TVSS LOAD (VA) BRKR El L2 ECL L1 L2 BRKR SIZE SIZE REV SERVICE DESCRIPTION AMPS BRKR VA VA VA VA VA BRKR AMPS SERVICE DESCRIPTION REV 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #1 .30 1 (2P) 526 652 526 2 (2P) .30 AROUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #2 0 0 5 526 652 526 4 0 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #5 50 5 (2P) 526 652 .326 6 (2P) ,30 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #4 0 0 7 526 652 .326 8 0 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #5 30 9 (2P) 326 652 326 10 (2P) 30 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #6 0 0 11 526 652 526 12 0 0 ,30 1,3 (2P) 526 652 326 14 (2P)i 50 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #8 0 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #7 15 526 652 526 16 0 0 50 17 (2P) 526 652 526 18 (2P) 50 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #10 0 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #9 19 526 652 526 20 0 0 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET #1 RECTIFIER #11 50 21 (2P) 526 1076 7DO 22 (2P) 15 0 0 25 .326 1076 750 24 NOKIA HETA 1900 0 0 15 25 (2P) 750 750 26 0 0 NOKIA HETA 850 27 750 750 28 0 0 15 29 (2P) 720 3600 2880 30 (1P) 30 ARGUS 24VDC CABINET 0 0 UMTB CABINET HEATER 51 720 720 32 0 0 TELCO BOX RECEPTACLE 15 `33 (1P) 180 180 34 0 0 UMTS CABINET RECEPTACLE 15 55 (1P) 180 180 56 0 0 BATTERY CABINET NO.2 15 `37 (1P) 180 180 38 0 0 39 0 40 0 0 41 0 42 0 ELK --- RED ELK o,~/ ORG ORO/WHT ~ ~ BLU BLU/WHT ! GROUNDING NOTES NEW SUPPLEMENTARY 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND INSPECT THE FACILITY GROUND CABLE 2/0 AWG, TYP. ', GROUNDING SYSTEM AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM (AS DESIGNED AND INSTALLED) FOR STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEC (AS ADOPTED BY THE AHJ), ~ ' THE SITE-SPECIFIC (UL, LPI, OR NFPA) LIGHTING PROTECTION CODE, AND / / ~GROUND \ I GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH TELCORDIA AND TIA GROUNDING STANDARDS. THE / / / .'.~x~/ J SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY VIOLATIONS OR ADVERSE FINDINGS TO THE ROD, TYP ~. CONTRACTOR FOR RESOLUTION. ~-_ × r.~ × × × × × x /~ / × ~ //~-. 7. × .~,'7~_~ × 2. ALL GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS (INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO, · -- ,I ....... ± ---~ --- _ ......... ~ ......... I /-- GRADE (~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ = .... \, LIGHTNING PROTECTION, AND AC POWER GES'S) SHALL BE BONDED T'OGETHER, "~ F/ '' ~ ~ / / hq~'~ ~ i J 3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM IEEE FALL-OF POTENTIAL RES[STANCE TO I ..... I . SYSTEMS. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL ~ GROUND ELECTRODES AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A TEST RESULT OF 5 OHMS OR : / PROTECT THREADED AREA ~ LESS. ~c ~ FROM DAMAGE DURING 4. METAL RACEWAY SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE NEC REQUIRED EQUIPMENT ¼ / AND AFTER INSTALLATION. 'x~ " GROUND CONDUCTOR. STRANDED COPPER CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN INSULATION, SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED · ' WITH THE POWER CIRCUITS TO BTS EQUIPMENT. 6. APPROVED ANTIOXIDANT COATINGS (I.E., CONDUCTIVE GEL OR PASTE) SHALL BE R U N -' USED ON ALL COMPRESSION AND BOLTED GROUND CONNECTIONS. 7. SURFACES TO BE CONNECTED TO GROUND CONDUCTORS SHALL BE CLEANED TO .... NEW A BRIGHT SURFACE AT ALL CONNECTIONS. '~ ~~~~~'-'Y--'~--' /~ ~/ _GR. oOU/~wDGCABLE 8. EXPOSED GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH COMPRESSION / 5/8"¢ X 10'-0" LONG ~ CONNECTORS WHICH ARE THEN BOLTED TO EQUIPMENT USING STAINLIESS STEEL C ~ P // ~ ~ % %~~ ~.,~, ~../ HARDWARE. INSTALLATION TORQUE SHALL ' NEW #2 AWG SOLID, BE PER MANUFACTURE'S REQUIREMENT. LJ' ~1 / ~ TINNED, BCW BURIED 9. ALL CABLE TRAYS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE EXISTING BURIED GRO)UND -- / ~ GROUND RING, TYP. ELECTRODE SYSTEM WITH A SINGLE CONDUCTOR #2 AWG SOLID TINNED / COPPER WIRE. NEW COPPER / ~NEW CINGULAR EQUIPMEN~ + DETAIL @ GFIOUND FIOD GROUND BAR, TYP. CABINETS, TYP. SCALE N.T.S · GROUNDING NOTES: ~- CAST IRON FLANGE AND CAUTION[: AT ALL SITES THE CONTRACTOR INSPECTION HAND ~ COVER WITH WORD 'GROUND' MUST VERIFY THAT THE SYSTEM IS COAX GROUND COAX GROUND COAX GROUND ./~x .//'~x ../~'~x ~ ~ CAST iNTO EFFECTIVELY GROUNDED AND MEETS THE BAR AT BAR AT BAR AT k/~'l~3k/~l~3~lZ~l~ HOLE ASSEMBLY- COVER. NEC ARTICLE 250 REQUIREMENTS AND SECT(:R "C" SE¢=~_" SECTO!, "A" r.p-"-E.~/T, Fp%E.~/Typ"~..~/ ~'~~5~~1: ACOEPTABLE TO THE LOCAL INSPECTOR/ " -- - ~ TYP. TYP. TYP. AUTHORITY. NEC ARTICLE 250-84 ---~ GRADE SPECIFIES GROUNDING RESISTANCE OHMS OR LESS FOR THE GROUNDING~ F-GROUND ROD/ o x. __~ .,._,. SYSTEM. THE PROJECT REQUIREMENT IS TypX,.~./ /TO EQUIPMENT~ -- ... ~ ~ ' '.- TYP. ,.].,GROUND RING ~ CABLE TO ROD CAD WELDED '-~.~ FIVE (5) OHMS. .~ Ty~Typ/~..~~~ " , , NOTE: ""' ~ ; ; ~N~CTION HAND HOLE MAY ,,: ".: , BE PRE CAST CONCRETE OR -' ~ ' ' NOTE: TO MONOPOLE f ~ COAX GROUND · 1. ALL METALLIC OBJECTS LOCATED WITHIN GROUND RING ~ '~¢, PVC AND SHALL BE A M NIMUM 6'-0" OF GROUND RING SHALL BE ,~ BAR ~ .; BONDED TO THE GROUND RING. /--#6 AWG "~x-#2/O OF 12" I.D.X36" DEEP. : 12. PROVIDE STRAIN RELIEF AND PROTECTION ,I ~ / ~ o F.~MASTER '% IoD o GROUND BAR ~ ':' FROM SHARP MATERIAL FOR INDIVIDUAL CONDUITq-I- --~ q # 2 AWG SOLID TINNED BCW TEST CABLES. PROVIDE #6 GROUND --OR COAX ; LOOP CAD-WELDED TO EGR.~. I · CONDUCTORS WITH TWO-HOLE CABLES I' ~ CONNECTORS TO CABLE RA,CK SECTIONS " " ~ ' ~ BAT]-. BATT. 24VDC 850/ 850/ 850/ MCP,~ UMTS i TOCETHER. 1900 1900 1900 I :'i = = ~ ,~ CLEAN SAND FILL ~ - NOTE: NOTE: AUX RING #2 AWG SOLID TINNED.~- NOTE: o' ¢_4- 2, 8- 5._4,, AWG GREEN INSULAT[ED, ARE #2 AWG GREEN CONDUIT BON[ NEW CPS ~ IF THIS SHEET IS 11" X 17" REFER ~ TINNED UNLESS NOT[ED INSULATED, TINNED 6 AWC ANTENNA~ - · .- .~~ TO ADJACENT GRAPHIC SCALE. 5/m"=Y-o" OTHERWISE. UNLESS NOTED MISC. METAL _A OTHERWISE. OBJECTS :~ T1 SURGEI ~N ~ SUPPRESSOR / GROUNDs/8,, X 10'-o"ROD COPPERLoNG WELD vt,. METER SCALE: 1-1/2' = i' O' ~- SCALE: 3/8=1'-0' NORTH~ SCALE N.T.S. BANK ~ rFC PROJECT NO CINCULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. Xcing wU,.!?ssr met:rD ORIENT BY THE SEA REST,'AURANT /~ 0,/~,/0~ ,SS.ED ~o~ CO.ST~UCT,O~ ~.. A~ "" 05 6478 AND metroPCS, LLC. WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA Z~' o4/24/o~ i$SLi£D FOR CONSTRUCTION GI4B ^~r "" AND DETAILS NY7320 WIRELESS, INC. ,v, A R C lq I T E C T S, L L P Z~ 04/27/O~ ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 40200MAIN RD NEW ClNGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. 5 SKYL~ DR. NO DATE REVISIONS BY CHK ^PR'D JOB NO SITE NO DRAWING NUMBER REV vo,c~' ~,,-~,¢-,4,0 ~*x: ~,,-~¢-~4,9 ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 11957 ~^~MOS. NO 0~652 HAWT.OENB. N¥10532,I '~%-"~:'~' NYCENY1059 SCALE AS NOTED DESIGNED BRAWN "¥. "Y/AW 4,~.~~' 24897 NY7320 E 5 5 DFN=STV[160,02:DwG 22 X 34 "D' 6 5 4 5 2 : 0~ .E ~E E~ ~5 JUN 2 1 2010 #6 AWG STRANDED Cu WIRE WITH GREEN, 600V,"~ EACH GROUND CONDUCTOR TERMINATING ON ANY GROUND ~3AR SHALL HAVE THWN INSULATION ,, NEWTON INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC. AN IDENTIFICATION TAG AIFACHED AT EACH END THAT WILL IDENTIFY ITS LOCKWASHER, F ///~FLAT WASHER, TYP. '~ '~ .... ~ ~ ~ BUTNER, N.C. OR~OIN AND DESTINATION. STAINLESS STEEL ~p. ///~5/8" x 1-1/2" GROUND BAR NO. REQ. PART NO. DESCRIPTION SECTION "P" - SURGE PROTECTORS HARDWARE~ ~ ~ /~/ HEX BOLT oRON WALL,oN ANTENNA FLOOR ~ 1 1/4"x4"xSO' SOLID GND. BAR CABLE ENTRY PORTS (HATCH P~TES)(~2) TWO HOLE / TOWER ~ ~ -- ~ ~ 2 A-6056 WALL MTG. BRKT. GENERATOR FRAMEWORK (IF AVAI~BLE) (~2) COPPER NUT, ~P.~ ~ ~ TELCO GROUND eAR (~2) COMPRESSION ~ ~ ~GROUND BAR ~--~--k--x ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 3061-4 INSU~TORS COMMERCIAL POWER COMMON NEUTRAL/GROUND BOND (~2) ~ ~ +24V POWER SUPPLY RETURN BAR (~2) / ~ , ~00~ ~ ~ ~ 48V POWER SUPPLY RETURN BAR ~EXPOSED BARE ~ ~ 50~5-B 5/8 LOCKWASHER RECTIFIER FRAMES. /COPPER TO BE KEPT ~ 5~ ~,0 COAX SUPPRESSION ~ GROUNDING ~ ~TO ABSOLUTE 0 ~ ~ R GROUNDING ~ CABLE ~/ [MINIMUM. NO ~ ~ ~ DOUBLE CRIMP ~ SECTION "A" SURGE ABSORBERS /INSU~T~ON ALLOWED ~ GONNEOTION ~ INTENIOR GROUND RING CABLE ~ ~ ~WlTHIN THE ~ANOLE SHOWN TO ILLUSTRATE WELD INTER,OR X '~ % ~ ~ EXTERNAL EARTH GROUND FIELD (BURIED GROUND RING) (~2) ~ COMPRESSION EXOTHERMIC WELD~ AT THE LOWEST POINT ON THE BAR GROUND RING ~ METALLIC COLD WATER PIPE (IF AVAI~BLE) (~2) ~- ON ROO~OPS) ~2 AWO SOLID BARE TINNED ~~~ ISO~TED GROUND ZONE ELEVATION SECTION COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR.~ ~ _~ SECTION "1" - RING AND GROUND BAR /// ~ p I~ ~ ISO~TED GROUND BAR - ~GB (~2) ~ ~ ~~ ' DETAIL NOTES: ~EXOTHERMIC ~ --~~WELD ~EXOTHERMICALLY WELD ~2 AWO BARE TINNED SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR TO NOTES: GROUND BAR. ROUTE CONDUCTOR TO BURIED GROUND RING AND PROVIDE 1. 'DOUBLINO UP" OR "STACKING" OF CONNECTION IS NOT PERMI~EB. PARALLEL EXOTHERMIC WELD. 2. OXIDE INHIBITING COMPOUND TO BE USED AT ALL LOCATIONS. ~ USE PERMANENT MARKER TO DRAW THE LINES BETWEEN EACH SECTION AND ~BEL EACH SECTION ("p", "A". "1") WITH 1" HIGH LE~ERS. ~~P. G"OU"D DA" CO""ECT'ON DETA'L ~~TION OFG"OU"DWI"ETOCO~C'"LEG"OUND"~"SCALE: N,T,S, ~ "G" "EFE"ENCE' G"OU"D B*" DET*'LscALE: N,T,S, TO TRANSMIT MONOPOLE ANTENNA ~JUMPER REQUIRED ~ANTENNA TO TOWER MOUNTED ~ONLY FOR 1 5/'8"¢ TO ANTENNA /GROUND BAR (CIGBE) U. TS (T A) COAX /TO (WHEN REQUIRED) AND EASE OF SEE NOTE 1. RECEIVE ANTENNA / - , - / .~ CONNECTION (~p.)/ SEE DETAIL 118 COPPER BONDING CONDUCTOR% i / TX ~CONNECTOR/' ~ ' ~~ ~LUG ~~ ~ ~ / WEATHERPROOFIkqG KIT - -- RX 1/RX2 ~ RX 1/RX2 STANDARD BONDING BUSHING LUG GROUND KIT (~P.)~ ANTENNA CABLE 12" TO 24" / WEATHERPROOFING ~: / ~q / KIT (~P.) ] , ~GROUND LUG LC. J /% 6 AWO STRANDED Cu BONDING BUSHING--_ , ' 'L ~~ / I~.1 / --STANDARD W[RE WITH GREEN, 600V, / ~ ~ ~ ~~ANTENNA GROUND P/N BGBOX OR ~ ~ I I WEATHERPROOFING X,T ~ ~ ',; " // (~P.) (SEE THWN INSU~TION (~P) ~ /BAR (CIGBE) AmmmOVE EaUAL) X I I (SEE NOT ;) ' I.Z I --FNOTZ) OF -- /CABLE (WP. FOR ALL) SEE DETAIL 118 *ONDINe ~USHIN~a ~ I~ (~P') ENT*Y PO*T ~EXOTHE*MIC WELD --¢ --~ VIA TRAY OR SET SCREW ~ ~ L ~ ~ (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) (SEE NOTES 1 A 2) ~ ~ ICEBRIDGE ~--CIGBE (GROUND BAR), 2 AWG Cu SOLID ~ ~ ~ % / DETAIL 118 MOUNTED / BARE -- %BONDINGLuG ~~ / NEAR/BELOW ANTIENNA GROUND SOLID2 AWG BCWTiNNEDRiNG /I TINNED COPPER WIRE SCREW ~' % ~ / / ~6 AWG STRANDED C'u METALLIC CONDUIT FROM TMA * ~~~ WIRE WITH GREEN, EXOTHERMIC (RGS, IMC, EMT, FLEX) ~ NOTES: WELD (~P.) ¢ () () 2 AWO BCW SOLID DIRECTIONS: ~. DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KiT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS (WHEN REQUIRED)~ ~ ~ 600V,THWN INSU~TIOfN ~/ ~~~ WELD TO MONOPoLETINNED EXOTHERMIC 1. MOUNT BONDING BUSHING ONTO CONDUIT DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO GROUND BAR. ~ ~ ~- --¢2 AWG Cu STRANDED BASE P~TE 2. TIGHTEN BOND BUSHING SET SCREW WIRE WITH GREEN, 600V, 5. INSERT COPPER CONDUCTOR INTO LUG 2. GROUNDING KIT SHALL BE ~PE AND PART NUMBER AS THWN INSU~TION BONDED SUPPLIED OR RECOMMENDED BY CABLE MANUFACTURER. ~ TO TOWER STEEL OR , .1~ ti 4. TIGHTEN LUG CONDUCTOR SCREW MONOPOLE NOTE: 5. TIGHTEN BONDING LUG SCREW 3. WEATHER PROOFIN(G SHALL BE (~PE AND PART NUMBER AS I ~ ~. NUMBER OF GROUND BARS MAY VARY NOTE: BONDING BUSHING, SET SCREW, LUG, SUPPLIED OR REC(OMMENDED BY CABLE MANUFACTURER.) NOTE: DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND DEPENDING ON THE ~PE OF MONOPOLE, KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT ANTENNA LOCATION AND CONNECTION LUG SCREW, COND. LUG SCREW, SHOWN GROUND WIRE DOWN TO CIGBE ORIENTATION. PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. AS COMPLETE UNIT. ~CONDU'T BO"D / G"OU"D BUSH'"G DET~'LscALE: N,T,S ~~T'O" OF C'BLEG"OU"D K'TTO'"TEN"AC*BLE ~ G"OU"D W'"E TO G"OUND BA" CO""EC''ONscALE. N.T.g. ~'"TE""' C'BLE G"OUND'"G'MO"OPOLEscALE: NTS OlNOULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. WILLIAM E. COLL1NS, AIA ~ */**/* ~SSU~.rO, OO,ST*UC*~O* O.. *~r "" OROUNDINO DETAILS A R C H I T E C T S, L L P NY7320 WIRELESS IRELESS INC. ~ */27/* ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION AVJ ALF NM i ~ ,0-,TEC~OLOGYDRIVE SETA~T. NYll'33 40200 MAIN RD NEW OINGU~R WIRELESS PCS, LLC. 5 SKYLINE DR. ,o *.~ ,~,,,o,s .~ c.x *,~'~, ~~¢~>~ ,oe,o. S,,E,O ORAWiNONU,BER VOICe. 631~89-8450 F~' 631-689-84¢9 ORIENT POINT, N.Y. 1 1957 ~5 ~ST ~D~O AW,DE PARAMUS, NJ 07652 ~WTHO~NE,~ ~0¢]2 ':~' NYCENY1 059 ~ ~ ~OT~ bs,s.~. ~o~w. ,~ ~/,v, 24897 NY7520 E-4 5 PSC= Em o._o o NEWTON INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC. BUTNER, N.C. NO. REQ. PART NO. DESCRIPTION 0 1 1/4"x4"x30" SOLID GND. BAR 2 A-6056 WALL MTG. BRKT. 2 3061 -4 INSULATORS 0 4 3012-1 5/8" 11x1" H.H.C.S. 0 4 .3015-8 $/B LOCKWASHER -f .----- f () ) . ~ '. ? ? ./ [ . , · · ..... ~ ........ '~ ~ , . ~ . ,' , , , ~ ~ ~. '~'~' '~'~'~:~.~.- ~ I ' ~" ~ ~ ' 4 ~ p'. ~A I .r ,. i ' ~ . ~ ~-~.~ .... -~ "i . ~ ' i ~ / . - ~P. ! ......... ~ ...... ~ .... ~'-'~-'-'%-'-'~ ........... ~' WP. CROUNDING SYSTEM CONNECTIONS ~EQUIPMENTGROUNDING P~N~* _// e COPPER O~OU~O RODS SC~LB ~/~"= Y-O' ~ ~ COPPER GROUND ROD IN TEST ~ELL NORTH GROUNDING KEY NOTES ~ MODU~R CELL CABINET GROUND BAR (MCGB) ~ SECTOR CABLE GROUND BAR (SCGB) ~ ~ 6 AWG STRANDED GREEN THWN INSULTED COPPER WIRE FROM COAXIAL GROUND KITS (CGK) AT COM;MUNICATIONS CABINET ENTRY, TO scoa. (~PICAL FOR EACH ANTENNA CABLE.) ~ ~2/0 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM EACH SCGB TO EQUIPMENT GROUND RING (EGR). _~ PANEL ANTENNA (SEE ANTENNA ~ ~2/0 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM EACH MCOB TO EOF. SCHEDULE, DWG A 7) ~ ~ AWG SOUD TI~[B COPP[~ Wl~[ F~O~ GPS CGK TO G~OU~B ~l~G (~P. ~ (~)) 5" O.D. MASI Al MO~OPOk~ CA~¢~ ICE ¢~IDG~ A~D ~[W CA~ ~ ~6 AWG STRANDED GREEN THWN INSULTED COPPER WIRE BOND JUMPERS AT ALL CABLE TRAY CONNECTIONS (~P. FOR ALL NEW CABLE TRAYS AND NEW 1/2" COAXIAL JUMPERS CA~.~ ~.c.osu~) ~ COAXIAL GROUND KIT (CGK) DO NOT INSTALL ON BENDS. (SEE DETAILS 2 ~ 5/E-4.) ~6 AWG STRANDED GREEN THWN INSULTED COPPER WIRE FROM CGK TO SECTOR ANTENNA GROUND BAR (SAGB,) ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLES ~ ~2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM ANTENNA MOUNT TO SAGB, CAD-WELD TO MOUNT (~P.) ~m SECTOR ANTENNA GROUND BAR. (SAGB) ONE BAR PER SECTOR. ' AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM SAGB TO NEW GROUND BAR AT WATER TOWER BASE (WTGB) ~P. NOTE: NEW GROUND BAR (WTGB) INSTALLED AT CABLE TRAY AT BASE OF WATER TANK = THIS DETAIL DEPICTS GENERAL GROUNDING ~2/0 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER W~RE FROM NEW GROUND BAR (WTGB) TO NEW EQUIPMENT GROUND R~NG (EGR). METHODOLOGY FOR ~P. ANTENNA ~ ~2 AWG STRANDED TINNED COPPER WIRE EXISTING MONOPOLE GROUND RING (V.I.F.). TO NEW EGR (~P. AT (2) LOCATIONS). ~/ FoRINSTAL~TIONS'sPECIFIC ANTENNA SEE ARCHITECTURAL MOUNTING. DRAWINGS ~ ~2/0 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE EQUIPMENT GROUND RING (EOF) BURIED 42" MIN. BELOW GRADE, CONNECTED TO GROUND RODS THAT ARE ~ , INCORPORATED INTO EXTERIOR GROUND RING. ALL CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE CAD WELDED AND SPRAYED WITH COLD-GALVANIZED PAINT. 56" ~ 5/8" X 10'-0" LONG COPPER C~D STEEL VERTICAL GROUND ROD BURIED BELOW FIN. GRADE. RODS SHALL BE P~CED NOT MORE THAN 15' AND NOT T AN * *mT F,O A ,AC NT O O,NO OOS. L ~ 5/8" X 10' O" LONG COPPER C~D STEEL VERTICAL GROUND ROD IN iNSPECTION 'TEST WELL' BURIED 56" BELOW FIN. GRADE. SET TOP OF TEST WELL~%~~p. ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE TO COMMUNICATION FLUSH WITH NEW CONCRETE S~B (SEE DETAIL 5/E-5). ~ ~2 AWG STRANDED TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM 60 ECV2 BA%ERY CABINET GROUND BAR TO EGR (~p.)).~ EQUIPMENT ~ ~2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM ELEC. PANEL GROUND BAR TO EGR. GROUND LEAD TO MASTER GROUND BAR ~ ~2 AWG SOL~D TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM TELCO PANEL GROUND BAR TO EGR. ~ ~6 AWG STRANDED COPPER WIRE JUMPERS CONNECTED FROM FENCE SECTIONS TO FENCE POSTS. (CAD, WELD ALL CONNECTIONS.) ~ ~2 AWG STRANDED TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM FENCE POSTS TO EGR. (MULTIPLE LEADS REQUIRED (~IP. AT ALL NEW FENCE CORNER POSTS) ~p ~ ~ AWO SmA~OZO T,NNZ~ COPmZ~ W,mZ FmO~ W~Xl~ STP ~A~ TO ~Om. ((~. AT (~) LOCAT,ONS) , ANTENNA GROUNDING DETAIL ~ - ~FC PROJECT NO CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC.  NYCENY1059 / LI- 1059 ~ ~9~ ~,~ ~.. WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ~ ~'~ /~ :~ METRO PCS EQUIPMENT GROUNDINC P~N ~ DETAIL PArA, US, Na 07S~2 HAWTHORNE,~ 10532 NYCENY1 0~9 sc~ ~s .o~ ~s~c,~o ~w. ~ ~/~w --~ ~%? 24897 ?~;;~ NY7520 6 ~m 4 i~ 5 2 o~=s~, eo,o~] ~o 22 x 54 "O'>sc =SIX 0 0 o~ ~m ~o o. 0 0 0 COAXIAL CABLE BETWEEN JUMPER CABLE~CONNECTOR COAXIAL CABLE JUMPER FROM ANTENNA AND BTS STEP1 ANTENNA JUMPERS WEATHERPROOFING I 1 --., KIT (TAPE, BUTYL ~ - I//,'-- \. & SCOTCH COTE)~ ~..J~U. ~ \ ~ .. ~ ]~1~ ~ STEP2X__ TAPE (1 LAYER) CONNECTORS ~.... ~k ~ //~'"" --...................... :~ v t E t ......... .. ~. STD, CABLEWAVE~ ~ ~ (~ NOTE: VERTICAL CONNECTIONS SHOULD BE GROUND KIT (TYP.) T TAPED FROM THE BOI~OM UP TO ~ E ~,~. , ~~ iI~ ~ ~ ~-- BUTYL TAPE (ALSO CALLED MASTIC OR MOVE WATER AWAY FROM CABLE '~¢~ Ri ~-' ;i~, I c STEP 3 TAFFY TAPE) CONNECTION. -- " lc, \ ?' GROUND WIRE TO BE / 1~]] k / L v' ,- f ~:~ ALL CABLE CONNECTIONS TO BE SOLID TINNED -- ~ . ~~T''' '''''z''~''-''~- WATERPROOFED AS ILLUSTRATED WITH GROUND WIRE TO x~~ TAPE (5 LAYERS IN 1 1/2" TAPE, ELECTRICAL TAPE, VAPOR SEAL (BUTYL GROUND BAR -- ---~ STEP4 AND 5 LAYERS 5/4" TAPE, ALL TAPE TAPE), THREE LAYERS OF ELECTRICAL WITH MINIMUM 50% OVERLAP) COAT TAPE AND SCOTCH COAT. __,/,__I, WiTH SM SCOTCH COAT. COAXIAL BETWEEN ANTENNA JUMPER CABLE NOTE: AND ETS JUMPERS FROM ETS DO NOT INSTALL GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO CIGBE. SCALE. N T.S, GROUND[NO NOTES: 1. ALL GROUNDING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST RECENT REQUIREMENTS OF NEC ARTICLES 250 AND 810 7. ALL METAL OBJECTS WITHIN 6' SHALL BE GROUNDED BACK TO THE EQUIPMENT GROUND RING WITH #2 AWG AND METROPCS STANDARDS. INSULATED SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE. 2. ALL DETAILS ARE SHOWN IN GENERAL TERMS. ACTUAL GROUNDING INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY DUE TO SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. IT IS NOT THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO 8. ALL BENDS, CURVES, AND CONDUCTOR SPLICES SHALL BE TOWARDS THE GROUND LOCATION (GROUNDED DEPICT EVERY PIECE OF EQUIPMENT AND DETAIL BUT RATHER TO SHOW SYSTEMS TO BE INSTALLED. END) OF THE CONDUCTOR AND SHALL MEET OR EXCEED MINIMUM BENDING RADII. GROUNDING CONDUCTORS PROVIDE SYSTEMS WITH ALL APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT OR COMPONENTS, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT, TO #6 AND LARGER SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS OF 12", GROUNDING CONDUCTORS #6 AND MAKE A COMPLETE OPERATIONAL SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CRITERIA SET FORTH. SMALLER SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS OF 8". 5. RESISTANCE TO GROUND SHALL BE 10 OHMS OR LESS, MAX. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY A GROUNDING 9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE: EVALUATION COMPANY SUCH AS D&H DEVELOPMENT (515-461-2969) OR EQUAL. NOTIFY METROPCS PROJECT A. BETWEEN EXTERIOR iTEMS AND BARS AND FROM SECTOR ANTENNA GROUND BARS TO TOWER GROUND MANAGER IF THERE ARE ANY SITE SOIL/RESISTANCE CONDITIONS THAT MAY PRECLUDE OR HAMPER A PROPER BAR, # 2 SOLID, TINNED, COPPER WIRE AND COMPLIANT GROUNDING SYSTEM INSTALLATION. GROUNDING ARRANGEMENT SHALL BE TESTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED CRITERIA. SUBMIT AN INDEPENDENT FALL OF POTENTIAL TEST REPORT. B. BETWEEN GROUND KITS AND BARS, #6 STRANDED GREEN THWN INSULATED COPPER WIRE. SHOULD THE CRITERIA NOT BE MET, CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL ENHANCEMENT WITH THE METROPCS PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH ENHANCEMENT WORK. C. FROM SECTOR CABLE GROUND BARS TO GROUND RINGS, AND FROM CABINET GROUND BARS TO GROUND 4. FOR GROUNDING OF PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT CABINETS, SEE CABINET MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS AND RING, #2/0 SOLID, TINNED, COPPER WIRE. ALL CONNECTIONS TO BE CAD WELD TYPE. SPECIFICATIONS. 5. SEE GROUNDING SCHEMATIC FOR ANTENNA GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS. 10. GPS TRANSMISSION LINES SHALL HAVE AT LEAST (1) GROUND KIT INSTALLED AT THE WAVEGUIDE ENTRANCE PORT. 6. ALL CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE MADE TO BARE METAL. THOROUGHLY PREPARE CONTACT SURFACES TO ENSURE 11. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY GROUNDING KITS AND HARDWARE, AS REQUIRED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH METROPCS A PROPER CONNECTION (I.E FILE PAINTED AREAS). PROVIDE COATING OF AN ANTIOXLDANT COMPOUND (NO-OX, STANDARDS. (COORDINATE WITH METROPCS PROJECT MANAGER.) OR EQUAL) ON CONTACT SURFACES OF ALL CONNECTIONS. ALL BELOW GROUND CONNECTIONS AND EXTERIOR 12. ALL ANTENNA MOUNTING HARDWARE TO BE GROUNDED TO APPRIOPRIATE ANTENNA GROUND BARS. CONNECTIONS TO EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CAD WELDED AND SPRAYED WITH COLD-GALVANIZED PAINT. ABOVE GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CAD WELDED, GROUND LUG, OR COMPRESSION FIr[ED. FOR GROUND LUG, 15. ALL ABOVE GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR TIGHTNESS AND CORROSION (6) MONTHS AFTER USE STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE CONSISTING OF TWO HOLE LONG BARREL LUGS WITH A LOCK WASHER THAT INSTALLATION AND EVERY (12) MONTHS THEREAFTER, SHALL BE PLACED ON THE NUT. 14. FOR DISSIMILAR METALS, USE CONDUCTORS WITH THE PROPER fBIMETALLIC TRANSITION CONNECTOR BETWEEN THE TWO. 15. METALLIC CONDUIT SHALL BE GROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC ARTICLE 820 40(A)5. PROVIDE GROUND JUMPER FROM BONDING BUSHING TO NEAREST BAR USING # 2 WIRE AND OZ-GEDNEY TYPE HBLG BUSHINGS. ~ ~........~D~.~, ~'FC PROJECT NO CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC. / / 40200 MAIN RD NEW OINGULAR WIRELESS POS, LLC. ,S~¥[¥N~DP~. NO DA. REVISIONS BY CHK APP'O '~2'~'4 ~ JOB NO. SITE NO DRAWING NUMBER REV VOICE. 631-689-8450 FAX, 631-689-8459 ORIENT POINT, N.Y, 1 1957 PARAMUS, Nd 07652 HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 SCALE AS NOTEDDESIGNED 10~*WN aY CY/^V, '%.~O~--q.....~, --'-:¢/"O""r---~Z'N~:¢ 'WcR'..<, 24897 NY7320NYCENY1 059 5 Jk, O N=B E 6O,O2] DWG 22 X 54 6 5 4 3 2 ~o 07_ ~5< JUN 2 2313