Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-96.-1-19.1 (7)
i W =Lu X W a Z o W z a m J a o � � LL wireless, z r W � , U WEST NYACK, NEW YORK z12 N W W 10, 0a zit O W 0 O LL 6 COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ' c WIRELESSy � � .. .. 0 o 0 V O N >M> Q K K K K K CUTCHOGUE 21855 COUNTRY ROAD EAST C . R. 48 ) a J W UJ W ¢ r Lu x O ° o O CUTCHOGUE , NY 11935 om Im O0 W Z Q In N U M w a y UJ Z U m > ? O m W J F Z Y LIST OF DRAWINGS 6 J O U SITE INFORMATION T-1 TITLE SHEET ° I I I;. _ Itll ryo 1 III@I VW SITE NAME: CUTCHOGUE 10- N III°1" I� W I I I ,III „sol � A-1 PLANS AND DETAILS � � o VW SITE NUMBER. NY274 " In u � PROJECT LOCATION: 132 SOUND AVENUE VE11N1952 ( i�VI I,I 3 a WIC I n SITE TYPE/DESCRIPTION: REPLACE (9) EXISTING ANTENNAS II IIIA C-1 ANTENNA INFO n1111 If m AT EXISTING LOCATIONS '�� ,, I ' p�','ii'�,I,41° ADD NEW LTE CABINET IN EXISTING ,+,'' „!'�i'�I'' ,I II, ,II 11j1 II, Glu II11 �' :I. (! "' u ' w" y 0) EQUIPMENT SHELTER .I 11' II,'I f°1'ii1 IIp!!� 'I _'� I ° o r, III a 1111 � I i I Ir BUILDING CONTACT: CROWN ATLANTIC III Ilea' 'II In , I . I , ' °'"III 111 I �' , I LEASING CONTACT: DICK WEYRHETTER 11III"' , ' III,Ir' r1 J::: Itl IH v (576) 739-4629 11 ! II' ,,,i' n, . II Iiiilii ,lu ,I, IIIIIp 1 i,,11 IY �14� 0 Q � P ill NNN CONSTRUCTION CONTACT: PETE McCARTHY II ' ,IHINI� ,' "� " III ° ,, 1 ' ', '� ■� w Z (631) 649-2730 II,I W it 11 I ^ dl W cn I ENGINEER CONTACT SCOTT M. CHASSE 860-6631697 fly II I,I 'h In , Ills' 'i It n ,° IIIIIiI I I ,I if i LATITUDE: 41° 01 46.5 N III I�� I� , I, 'I•;: I I III I I Ii II III , I II 9 ry n 1 3!I LONGITUDE 72' 29' 50.3" W '' III j I' '' '' ,I, III ' ELEVATION: 55'± 15000AMSL "I,q "�I !I, lllf 111 I n, III 11 I,,� ', �' 11 .1111 IPI( ,' I ,,II„ ,I Iti „ `II 'i lil SECTION 096 III" II I�4,'fg ''C4WII ! IIf Z BLOCK. 001 " i IIIII'�ii�' a" I �cNiA , " r� LOTS: 19.1 ,, 11 I'0jti ZONE. "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I�' 'I °' "1 lu m ^ U Iu„Ii II III 11 �'I W o 0 Zlm V g n III . � IIm L_Iv p IIgI ii; I i z a � o4Z 11'I ” °II III, III 11 no 01 Ir til) i, z m O O I, II III .. d II .I III II 11 III II p Z J � .. „ 0- n LL LL (LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP a x NTS SCALE: 1" =500' bb ,SFO uq u^o3 y �y>h"yO"nlmm9m�� �i i ZONING TABLE: CUTCHOGUE "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT EXISTING COMPOUND ACCESS GATE (TYR 5PQ APPROVED FUTURE ITEM REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED tul a N11s 19� LANDSCAPE MAX HEIGHT(FT) .. _.. ..................... 80 *112 5± (1) IVC _ BUFFER a ¢ x MIN LOT AREA (SF) .... . . .... 40,000 45,569- IVC ... . J/ \ \ y lti4 *'°�tl '"� MIN LOT WIDTH (FT) . .. ... .,,, 100 ..... . . 168 17± IVC ..... REPLACE MIN, LOT DEPTH (FT) ..... .,,.. . ...... ....... 150 .......... 26316L IVC ... EXISTING LESSEE •— . '< — ' — MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK(FT) .. .. * GPS ANTENNAS 100 „ ....... 75 IVC EXISTING Q > MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK-ONE (FT) 20 *15 2 IVC (TYP 2-PL,) LESSEE F ❑ ELECTRIC METER a MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK- BOTH (FT) 40 451- NO GENERATOR J a r 1 SIECOR FIBER Z MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK ...... .... 70 *11 1 .... NO 0 O w N Ci '. -� (FT) A PR VED E l Q Q MAX LOT COVERAGE l`N,) ........... __.. 30 .. 45,fi2 ...... IVC F ❑ zw E ENT - - - — A P ¢ 0 P _ _ _ w Z I Z w 2 I etr PCS `% 8 — — �ATTERY RACK ELEC TS �I EXISTING LESSEE 6 (7 a a 6 �.. ;� NA = NOT APPLICABLE NO = IVO CHANGE ELECTRIC METER -t a Z 7 S 1 e Ei w EXISTING DIMENSIONAL NOIN-CONFORMITY N j w N w m w P D �¢ EXHAUST __ z LIL ;#97-423-144 nipp FAN u (1)TOTAL HEIGHT TO APPROVED FUTURE TOWER EXTENSION AND ANTENNAS �^ O w a `(j w a -�'(D Z ° CABLE RACEWAY w pUTE wwD W x ° Q RCA ILL Zw a Ww 4 ___L MODMOD iv- —_ - AO - - ACK CK t D 3a -- - - - M�D D a -- Im — �� a-1oz° 1 HVAC CONTROLS D m Q EXISTING LESSEE 12 PORT ENTRY DESK w = a O ^'T�'-' .. 222°„ O ¢ GPS ANTENNA LS GPS AIVT d II'9i111?•A �j H w ( ) ENNA L EXISTING PROPERTY LINE I DU PANEL EXISTING N I NME W HVAC W II"'ice Z COAX CABLES RUN IN METAL EXHAUST VENT y� F N O y_342° CT FROM LESSEE SHELTER TO W N Z LE m w NOISE CERTIFICATION: o o — J THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LTE CABINET IS WITH IN O LL U — _ — _ ,— .— F— — THE CONFINES OF THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER 2 K K 1 ► AND WILL THEREFORE NOT CREATE ANY INCREASE IN EXISTING 105'-7/z'- AGL a I I EXISTING 24"X24" MONOPOLE NOISE LEVELS AT THE EXISTING FACILITY. COVERED CABLE v e �! BRIDOE W/(12) 7/g" (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA I- 0 0 1} COAXIAL CABLES SECTOR PANEL ANTENNAS 4 C 105-7" AGL TO BE 2 1 REPLACED W/(9) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED V 1 TO EXISTING MASTS j COMPOUND PLAN /SHELTER PLAN SCALE : 1" =10'-0" �, -1 SCALE : /6" = V.0" a z 29,9'± 1 GRAPHIC SCALE L) _ F U to c 10 o s m 40 40 M 1 W N > a 1 cn I (IN FEET ) W 0 J U Q I � N/F I Inch= 10 k x O r h 0 IR EXISTING HARRIS N m BUILDING I LOT 18.1 uZ ? W Z a' N z 31 NUM w ¢ C0 m 13 °o o - ml� APPROVED FUTURE CARRIER POLE Lu 0 Z r m �n �n EXTENSION AND ANTENNAS > Z O m O N m Np 12 W N Z II "I h LL Q p V m ° __�1 1 (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA Q OJ O U m' I > SECTOR PANEL ANTENNAS E Ca 105'-7"AST TO M _ BE REPLACED W/(9) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS O v - MOUNTED TO EXISTING MASTSw Z0 'a > 0 `i ¢ N ZIN - •° ° EXISTING MICROWAVE ANTENNA O U > � '2 OOJ p1 - = � wzIT IT �' a 1 -I AMPHENOL AMPHENOL 0u a D o PAVED J O ' EXISTING 100' MONOPOLE O " a H,p WITH A 2' REVEAL AT BASE V w u AREA 1 p a m "` BXA-70090/4CF (LTE) BXA-171090/BCF (PCS) � 0 u r w r a it �p +I 0 111 I 12 0 Ibe 11.0 las { I I T — 2.64 SF 2.04 SF o J Ic. (n N N n N N a @J a � :1 � � m m U z hl J 1 '1 O y ft ^' 0) m h J V! O O z -m° a a J N Izw- Z U o Q Y EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND > C } EXISTI G LESSEE 12'x26' Q w m u 0 i1 J 1 e > Q Z I EQUIP ENT SHELTER W/(2)— I w J Z U Q - EXISTING LESSEE EQUIPMENT SHELTER Y Y COAX L CABSIPS A LES IT Viz' _ _ I ¢ m a c- Q o0 ° CE EXISTING LESSEEm m Q REP Ir - - - O w Z 0. w Z a b ' EXISUP6TING LESSEE EE GENERATOR I'--1 r� � M. ~ z 80" 59" 61" 41" 41" II 1 and z w m E� LL w Z w Q Z ? EXISTING LESSEE (12) PORT ENTRY PANEL FRONT TOP SIDE FRONT TOP SIDE h� APPROVED FUTURE EQUIPMENT TO R = 1105"- C w w D w O Z ¢ ¢ WITH (12) 7/g" ANDREW COAX CABLES RUN w Z ti ¢ w Z IN METAL DUCT FROM LESSEE SHELTER I j r rI oLL N w ¢ a TO EXISTING MONOPOLE PANEL ANTENNAS � � aw ~ Z U w_ ;,I EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT SHELTER l 1 F a m z ¢ EXIST. I A-1 ¢ EXISTING TELCO CABINET PCTEL n, 1425' � c- �l N � = GPS-TMG-HR-2N MONO- V J ��{� ' '� � XISTING MONOPOLE TO R = ~ w Z EXISTING T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT PAD 5" /2"-- 3° ~ TOR 42 �± ..:� X m '; _ ' EXISTING 105-7 AGL 0 .X I�'I"' L MONOPOLE W/APPROVED Nz� ) N Z m 152w - 4nJjr .. �= A� X „� wm U 1 EXTENSION TO 108'-11"��` x w Z m EXIST. I � .X �X LW 13 0 EQUIP r�1_ ! — — - - - - - J� _X .-X — Ye 12 ii IF Z 00 1q �c 11 TOR EXIST. MONO- �X K F=- a�' 2 POLE TO ► S .-X N/F ��X .x TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GPS ANTENNAS Z w w a �XEXIST. EQUIP, TO Lor ns SITE PLAN REFERENCE: Lu °o z o � a �x �X 1 , CUTCHOGUE SITE, NEW SITE PLAN AND DETAILS, COUNTY I— 0 , 3: w X ROUTE 48, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW SITEPLAN YORK PREPARED FOR NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS �+ STRUCTURAL NOTE: Q COMPANY REV. I, DATED 11/12192 AS BUILT. PREPAREDAWESTERN ELEVATION PLEASE REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS GRAPHIC SCALE L SCALE : 1" _ 40'-0BY EDWARDS AND KELCEY, INC. 70 SO COMPLETED BY OTHERS. AVAILABLE UNDER AVENUE, LIVINGSTON, NEW JERSEY 07039 -� SCALE :%6' = V-0" SEPARATE COVER. 2. DRAWING ENTITLED"PROPERTY SURVEY" PREPARED FOR THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC ON JUNE 4, 2009. GRAPHIC.` SCALE PREPARED BY AREK SURVEYING COMPANY ANTENNA DETAILS = 4o c e0 40 s0 ia0 3 SITE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY APT ENGINEERING ON Is o a ie 0z s� 3/,,, m F W -� SCALE : /4' = 1'-0" 01/10/12 AND 01/16/12 a (IN FEET) IN FEET q0F 11nch= 40 ft 11nch= 16 R andm ESS ,�y. II ANTENNA DATA (LTEA-BLK) (LTE C-BL4) EXISTING ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING PLATFORM WITH (9) MASTS ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL CABLE 0 0 SECTOR MODEL QTY STATUS DOWN TILT DOWN TILT SIZE AZIMUTH ALPHA CELLADA-85408580OF 2 - 0. REPLACE (1)7/8' 102" PCs' ADA-85408580CF 1 - 01 REPLACE (2)7/5" 102" ,� Z O > 7� -- Lu LL0 (PCS/AWS) 1D a / (CELL) Z a a BETA CELL. ADA-85408560OF 2 - REPLACE (1) 7/a' 222° PCS.ADA-85408560CF 1 - REPLACE (2)7/a" 222' 10, (CELL) GAMMA CELL, ADA-85408580CF 2 - REPLACE (1)7/5" 342' IX=102 PCS ADA-85408580OF 1 - REPLACE (2) 7/5" 342" I 1 rc 0. 1C � GPS N/A 2 - - REPLACE (2)Ye' N/A eamoit f 1 2 r 4 J r\ (PCS/AWS) PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS - Y � ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL NO OF CABLE EXISTING 100 SECTOR MODEL QTY AZIMUTH - MONOPOLE W/ rr= DOWN TILT DOWN TILT CABLES SIZE _ - -'` U _ APPROVED �) 222° c ALPHA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - 0° 1 REUSE EXISTING 115° l\ � - XTENSIGN TO BXA-171090-BCF (PCS/AWS) 1 - 0` 1 REUSE EXISTING 115^ - ii g BXA-70090-4CF (LTE C-BDq 1 - 0° 1 REUSE EXISTING 115^ (LTE A-BL4Q '(r, 108'-11"± AGL ,:� w w Z COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLIq 1 (1)7/5" (LTE C-BLVD ,lam. 1i w2 z �" r.r - ru BETA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - a. 1 REUSE EXISTING 222' - OD U BXA-171090-BCF (PCS/AWS) 1 - 8° 1 REUSE EXISTING 222` /I BXA-70090-40F (LTE C-BLVQ 1 - 8° 1 REUSE EXISTING 222^ 1 I y-342/ i l O O COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLK) 1 (1)7/a' u w GAMMA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - 3° 1 REUSE EXISTING 342° ,j f ? c BXA-171090-8CF (PCS/AWS) 1 - 3' 1 REUSE EXISTING 342^ BXA-70090-40F (LTE C-BLIQ 1 - 3- 1 REUSE EXISTING 342° Z 'o COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLIQ 1 (1) 7/a" l / V o iii " v GPS N/A 2 - - 2 REUSE EXISTING - w w (2) RFS FTLBR5002 TRIPLEXERS TO BE INSTALLED ON ANTENN PIPE MASTS AT EACH SECTOR, (2)TOTAL TRIPLEXERS PER SECTOR. Y CF2A1 : 4-LINES 3-ANTENNAS M4 (PCS/AWS) a = a F U N 8 (LTE A-BL4Q Q o 700-850 700-850 PCS-AWS (LTE C-BUKq U) H Q XXOL XXOL XPOL 0) Lu w Lu J J W Q H (CELL) x O YO) D S 2 v > > U O w Z 6 3 Al A2 A3 ^ o a rn 1 •1 1 1 (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA SECTOR i O _ qY`� PANEL ANTENNAS 4 @ 105'-TAGL TO BE REPLACED W/(9) W (9 O w ADA 634X636XCF-CDIN „n1 11 4yz, AOA-854X85&XCRFDIN w -^ I� NEW PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING MASTS ? O w w , may_ ' PI I FETP al I b"U, Ill -11e1 "" n "„' �r -i l- JPI FT6 , 1 A 1 n I ••",4 R: Q U ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL w � o v U o S SCALE'Yz '=1'.0" 0 PCS-AW 0 0 WZ I FQU ^ or m mE er QQ o o O o U JOoo � x m , ADA 854085 ' La n (TY ) - �, :,ar - ,n„rr„ N m u ° .r,, a — - 12 5# .a r .rr o o DIPLIXER DIPLEXER U u o 0 . P 6PL WGT rvue ,,„- ra,u,-„> wl ^9;;;!;; C C wx roan mxrn Ipl A^-. IA�:1:RC:. U El 1U- putWx.41 �: ttM ... n ° F PtiY nzcn ,a - ,onv =toer -” IIA•^” U per, ry u Puapa,am l+eaans5u .0 ... � ;rluk runt/ � a+. - "rw ,:un AOS A08 7 BPA l4"'rr"N” rJi _ oae„R MMI WIFl FIVs mL mi °r erre m ew - .,r Q, Q aii 1 4 ii JNr, CD rn W n I nrn•v rtmxu I Ne ;,m., n an, �" �F� n J dr g1'Ih.lY.h „n. � i n n. a � � ur II ux ia,... r-.. >tir I, rrv�r r=I+orxr ,...... n u ...:'i�:. . - + + � d1 m I.� II 1111u!( ,Jnvwnurlt•Ivnrt nlmuv •^• ro.• m ux noc ein s „-a°: m, IE o 00 O7 o nm o ^ u Q r enarrnrvAtl�,'a'^^urrrvl4t;:sznrre n -,..n io nc,=rai n;w; ouc - m,ryya e,aumm mewrr, - rnm^ O } _ z ADA 63406380CF O O EXISTING (TYR 3PL) WGT = 17# DIPLEXER DIPLEXER DIPLEXER DIPLEXER [[ Q EXISTING 7AC8B 7AC8B 7AC8BPA 7ACBBPA W Z PROPOSED GY" PROPOSED 0 ¢ Q ,� o W AmphanoI eY" aY" (El- a •11 1710-2170 QI SECTOR. ALPHA BETA GAMMA `v ,m 6XA-70090.4CF-EGIN-X """-""" .T' m BXA-171090-SCF-ED)IN-X BASE COLOR WHITE BLUE GREEN •� " 9 4 ,� .-,^,I._,n..,_; 850. GRAY GRArY GRAY ...iv l it Pam+ 1 su r 1 n o:•o „' "., c a Y,.pol I MT P.4 19.1 I ro,'an1 "-, ,", > [[:" R", """,°"." LTE-C: REO RED RED 0 WJ LTE-A: ORANGE ORANGE ORANGE PCs PURPLE PURPLE PURPLE C� y;. BXA 171090-8CF n w u� _* AWS YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW Z n itr .�.m ........ n,a.. __ II (TYP 3PL) WGT = 11# wm rruamwhar .,.. ". - VIII III GPS' LLI a m U PIC ii 9 li N DF n - -ennei :a FUTURE W O eh o W nnttl M� n a ....11 jl,i AWS Z O Z e �ti fR0 tme w n rar .. .... a _ - - FUTURE U1 C Z �g � a0 � , uor n r 5xry ru°° :"n - — /v una�e,",�r rin _ PCS-AWS Zy - - - LTE-7A 850 LTE-7C PCS LINE WITH W O O Z is Q uurrlpn'u•mun m°i T �I FRAME F E O ? aur m r - - - lu III'„ RAM FRAME FRAME DIPLEXER d m a 0. Irr _ _ , ” m v mmnmu m rmo', u - l�llul Q Y vhl u n aYI m avr ifr a „m r1 xox via n 1 i r xblN r: au, oft o Imnr " real m ul vneai ua1.11 11 Elep NEW a°ak". RXA 70090-4CF eALPHA BETA, GAMMA ANTENNAS �a • (TYP 6PL) WGT = 12# -an,tt * , COAX SABLE DIAGRAM �P Q ,,, c� Ss9� SCALE : NTS '� (�,-�„YP w SIDE BY SIDE Y% Oa • ]ee ' P"EF°' TAX LOT X117.5 N/0/F TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Q l 188.15 2.2'NW N 230 1 AY Ooll E \� F E C E C A I N L I N STORAGE BIN 10.9'SW 10.4' 4.0•NW 77.7'SE 8.6'SE MONOPOLE GR A S S ......165'............... ................. .. ............. .... ...................... METAL S FRAME ----- ------ lm - - / T-.. GR ASS W UJ _ LU J p �. i / GATE z Coo ti APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 00 " VERIZON EASEMENT GA l%0I I I (RECORD-EXIBIT W V105786) 9 3,SW 0 1- Y N o al II - • UNDERGROUND VERIZON o M I WIRELESS CONDUIT M (RECORD-EXIBIT W V106723) 00 N w z i Z ASPHALT PARKIN G TAX LOT #19.7 EDGE OF ASPHALT W AREA: 13.1'SW ; (A UI I I 45,589 Sq.F. Ln < I_N 1.0465 Acres 3 0 a II ASPHALT PARKING ROOF_OVERi14.85'SW I • i ----------------------------- 29.91 55 705.15 I < rn ±10'CONCRE� islet 3 I l i /21855 3 0I 7. FRAME in METAL i I I � (AUTO SHOP) i Of O �I •i 105.15 ' �1 w II ----- --------- ----------- -- --- -----------IioFSV�o r rm � �Z QZ X LOT #20.1Z iiTA j CO * QV I of Y OD N/O/F CHRISTOPHER MOHR cn Wo I S GRASS Z w �� III o TM GRASS m S Z v '(ACTUAL) FI� WOOD CURB i�N 7t75O' (DEED) LJ LILCOz - 1.5N TILITY POLE D/ t UTIIJTY POUF � #420 CONCRETE CURB uR 168-17' - --............... �,:....... S 25°52'307. ELEC. CONDUIT MWTT E (120' VADE) ROAD (MARK-OUT) MWDLE NOTES' (C.R.-48) 1. THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON. FROM 7HE PROPERTY LINES To THE STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE- THEREFORE THEY (NORTH ROAD ARE NOT INTENDED To MONUMENT PROPERTY LINES OR TO GUIDE THE ERECTION OF FENCES. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 2.MODIFYING ANY NEW OR EXISTING CURBS. WALK OR ROADWAYS I NTALLING OR CONSULT WITH THE HIGHwAy DEPARTMENT BEFORE DESIGNING. THE STREET SHOWN HEREON. 3. SUBSURFACE INFORMA71ON SHOWN HEREON WAS BASED ON VISUAL OBSERVATIONS, VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS- AND/OR PRIVATE uTILITY COMPANIES RECORDS, AND/OR UTILITY MARKOUT. TwsIR��Yoa ACCEPTS no RESPOr15eltrr FOR CI IRt�Y OF PROPERTY LOCATED_ AT. ANY OF THIS DATA. SUBSURFACE UTILITIES ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY AND/Olt C.R.-48. CUTCHOGUE COMPLETENESS. 4. ALL. suRSURFACE UTIUtB LOCATION AND DEPTH SHOULD BE RECHECKED AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL GRADES SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE TOPOGRAPHICAL BURFJAI, PREFERABLY IN WRITING BEFORE COMMENCING FINAL DESIGN.OR COMMRUCTKIn• COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 5. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE n0 VISIBLE STREAMS OR NATURAL WATER COURCES IN THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY- STATE OF NEW YORK 6. REFER TO ARTICLE 36 OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW AND THE PRO NSKINS �T nt1 ....... 96 OF INDUSTRIAL CODE PART (RULE NO. 53) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OR DISTRICT ....... 1000, SECTION DEMOLITION IS COMMENCED- THESE LAWS REQUIRE EACH EXCAVATOR TO ONE BLOCK 1 , LOT(S) 19.1 ADVANCE NOTICE TO ALL OPERATORS OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES OF HIS ......• INTENT TO PERFORM EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION IN THE SPECIFIED AREAS 7. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN U.S. STANDARD MEASUREMENTS. 8. EASEMENTS NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. PFA REMSMS DESCRIPTION By ONE FILE F y 1. PROPERTY SURVEY AS CO. 06-04- ASOD9112 Ny copies from the original of this surveymarked with an riginol of the land surveyors embossed seal shall be 1 onsidered to be valid true copies. �. nauthor'¢ed alteration or addition to a survey map bearing gRKAD1USZ JUSIEGA. P.L.S. licensed land surveyors seal is a violation of section 7209. ub-division 2, of the New York Slate Education Low. erh6cahon indicated hereon signify that this survey was �` O repored in accordance with the existing Code of Practice •�N 50565 J� or Land Surveys adopted by the New York Slate Association N�� SCdG p 5 f Professional Land Surveyors. Said certifications shall run1� _ 3' my to the person for whom the survey is prepared, and on 58 East Beverly Parkway is behalf to the title company, governmental agency and Valley Stream. NY 11580 Job No- ending institution listed hereon, and to the ossignees of the www.agmy.net MTM DESIGN GROUP, Inc. ending institution. Certifications are not transferable to 516 792-6676 ASC-09112 dditionol institutions or subsequent owner. MY PfETFdIQ ' -'1• 1 50 RIR" VKANDESCENT LAMP Ur VIA "g G9HIELM LB4NTFILLRIGS TO R FROM MONOPOLE CENTER 1 OUT ADJACENT T``\ �'y° pAgl(uw cAGLUDNg EXISTINNG BUILDING 40 % CO'14.000 S.F. ♦/ / I'. \\ LOr 20.1 T,re/2.IG Im,[Iwwb PROPOSED RADIO EQUIPMENT BUILDING 112' K 28'1 312 S.F. cent I 1 EXISTING BUILDING USE, - •11 1 MECHANICAL CONTflACYOR'3 BUSINESS • I. .F / 1 \ - "I CATERER 1.200 ZOO SS.F REPAIR ' / \ LCISYIwa ie[£E flEPAGARAGE 1.200 9.f / \1 MP1 uEco I / wtrc - L /•Pe ur � % + Y � E� �•-, .. PROPOSED BUILDING USE,} \ Q _t-_�,.4• 1 j UNMANNED EQUIPMENTELTER 312 S.F. 1t 1 pA YpILLQW.LINES I9HELTER REOUII IN ELUENT EQUMMENT X11 MAINTENANCE VISTS. APPROXIMATELY I VIET t N PER NORTH.I 1 � .1 �Ge Pr�(p saTenC�iYnl__ I I PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER USE, 4 - DELINCATIC I '1 1 MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S BUSINESS I SPACE/EMPLOYEE PLUS 2 SPACES PARKING SPACES I writ .I CATERER I SPACE/EMPLOYEE PLUS 2 SPACES 0'X 1 - ••, 14 - 1I �I 11 R 11 NG CES I I REPAIR GARAGE • 4 SPACES/BAY PLUS I SPACE/EMPLOYEE ,LI a iIBP•=WdU \ `�• 1 CLOCK/ /'�I• I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES • GREATER OF I SPACE/EMPLOYEE OR 1 RNul / LOr A9./ 6�1 I SPACE/500 S.F. IF REWIRED PARKING SPACES, 1\ s O .. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR 5 2 SPACES X SPACE/EMPLOYEE 2 \1 I B' ` �eF frBm CARS wtrtl IY Q RD \\ ` I I W CATERER. 2 EMPLOYEES % I SPACE/EMPLOYEE 2 2 SPACES 2 + } ° vx"ob". I H MP.1 rr I h REPAIR GARAGE, I BAY X 4 SPACES/BAY 4 •2 EMPLOYEES X 1 SPACE/EMPLOYEE- 2 uj f \\ R nI �/ 2pM� ' I$ " Z, EQUIPMENT SHELTER, I EMPLOYEE X I SPACE/EMPLOYEE . I RUN) / TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING SPAES Is 1 RNA •'/T" "�NMiG1E,M J 4I . I::. 1^ 1 I ' PARKING-SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD STALL 10' % 20' 18 S i l t¢ r PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ., HANDICAPPED STALLS 12.5' % 20' - @ I i TOTAL PARKING SPACES PA(NIM✓;. IB 4er"T.111 PP Ptvmwln I I �.. inter •--��" I G\ jam. I � 1 4V£r41w0� r f i " WGeMSJ1BI f " ELEtTlre MLi£e¢wF uAaxxP4P4.YA,' ." AP71E J\.J tOr A11.1 NIP NABt/3 TOW,/GS .PROPOSED SITE P4,�(1�1fi1TH PARKING R g 992 t3�A1-E lp. 0 R p y MME, SURVEY INFORMATION USED ON 'MAN OF I PLANT MATERIALS PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR ARTHUR V, JONGE. INC.- PREPARED BY ROOEBILX WAN TUYL. L.S. �, ""` °°"'N"` N nNEmfAAKkN0. 23828 pATEO 9/23/89 AND LAST REVISED E/14/BB. � •� N PWIw b111MPVM16 NEnux eoRBER v1R[ a'-e•/e•e m' o.t.mms NIl" AUSTRIAN PARE '- w' . .LOT .BLOCKi RI" + .wV:.INI1i.NA MJHNM YIwIp PINE °'-: /°•° °.°. ' E COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY MSw.C. NO. 10000-Q8 TfE 481 . CUTCFN%IZE� UTIp IL OF SOLO. NEW YORK. - p "I •NP1C, A MAY BE RIPIHICRTFP PiH rT IPICEA FUNBEAS' CMM4P°MLK fPRUCEI LOT AREA • 45.599 S.F. . 1.04 AC` 1111MIM MI 11IE AVXK 9 ITY OF PLAN!NATERI•L.AT eILCNENTAT - CUTCHOGUE SITE SITE PLAN EXHIBIT me OAT• LI LwNT L•9p9TRIK - ' COUNTY ROUTE 48, TOWN OF $OUTHOLD REQUIRED PROVIDED SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK LOT SIZE 40.OpOpD SF 45.589 SF LOTE"%T Igo 154 2T5s DATE OCTOBER IB. 1991 BOTH BIDE YARD 45 111* I �� ♦ SCALE AS SHORN, REM YARD TO Y4a• N�Br• L, 0WG NO 92-8014 • SETBACKS FOR PROPOSED NYNEX RADIO EQUIPMENT Qj 11/19/91 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS BUILDING RICHARD EL P.E.NO. 000007-1 REV. N0. DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET I OF I I FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY C- SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date Sent: fd�3_l�� Project Name: Project Address: Ckm -- Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000` (z_- Zoning District: l-1- _ - Request: - , — (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation a� to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: 'Pls Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required:AQ s Signature of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: f, P.D. Date Received: / �4 / 1� Date of Comment:_/ I L / ments: S S. �2 XM c1� Qat P1eD5zj see, a ac • L , Si ature o nti Re wer Final Determination Date: Decision: Sinnatiira of Rnildino Insnectnr MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ` QF S0 P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKItiSouthold, NY 11971 Chair O .1f. OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS T Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR lyCOUn 1` Southold, NY 111` Telephone:631 765-1938 Fax:631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael J.Verity, Chief Building Inspector From: Brian Cummings, Planner Date: July 20, 2012 Re: Proposed Verizon Wireless LTE upgrades @ Junge SCTM#1000-96:1-19.1 As an addendum to the attached SPUD report, please be advised that the landscaping requirement detailed in the approved April 6, 1992 site plan (Verizon formerly known as "Nynex"), remains outstanding. It is recommended that the completion of the landscaping requirement be included as a condition to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed modifications and upgrades. TY. Scientific Name Common Name Size/Root Spacing 13 Pinus Strobifurmis *Mexican Border Pine 5'-6' H 10' o.c. 6 Pinus Nigra Austrian Pine 5'-6' H 10' o.c. 4 Pinus Montana Mugho Pine 18"-24" 6' o.c. Mu us *"Mexican Border Pine"may be supplemented with (Picea Pungers, Colorado Blue Spruces) depending on the availability of plant materials at implementation. Thank you for your cooperation. �Ito; ., , ov �LrE�NDBS Rf.LpfAp F oYE�" LUT pR J I ` R .dpTMlE! 70 LOG' It FROM MDNOPOLE CHNfER F 0111T Lff LtAHF 'fhllllNG . ONi.O-nDJACENT ER;'1'. LI9 I__ ♦\\ \3 p PARKING GALOIATRXM � � EXISTING BUILDING 40' N ro0' 9.000 S.F.w'F WAY PROPOSED RAQIQ EDIIIPMENT BUILDING 112' X 26'1 312 S.F. 4 I EXISTING REWMNGLDICONTRAC*R'S NMINESS - 1.600 $.F _I EYISYGB T<CaCATERMP REPAIR p ARAGE 200 S.F _ I to R I PROPOSED BUILDING EQUIPMENT,, TER 312 S.F. NM E� Ylp uNcs � 1 4 - [SHELTER REOURRES I AIIP NT EWN'MENT 1 - _ IWINTENANCE'VISTS. /IRPRO%1MATELY I VIBT PER NORTH.i I i tm,•� .1- 4 - DELINFAT{ I i_ ., ' PARKING SPACE REWIREMEMTS PER USE, - 1 - 4 - 10'X ! PARXAMG,ePAt'E8 WALL �I NECWWIOAL fAtITRACTeRFIM �3 BUSINESS - I $PACE/ PLOYEE PLUS 2 SPACES NDN-DELI ,TCD I V . . r CATERER I SPACE/EMPLOYEE PLUS 2 SPACES pm we B►NLER ` NeNNP1E$ . , I REPAIR GARAGE 4 SPACES/BAY PLUS I SPACE/EMPLOYEE 100• ! LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES GREATER OF 1 SPACE/EMPLOYEE OR I SPACE/800 S.F. REWIRED PARKING SPACES. \\\ _ , _ , e I feI B'trlt 0 I •q1p I; MEC K:Al. CONTRAC7011'S • $ L BPLACE88 % I SPACE/EMPLOYEE • 62. . �( \\\\\ 4 N Y1 �\ • �/ ate. i .K. 0. .1 I C) LIL - CATERER, 1 2 E PLO EYEESSS X 1 SPACE/ LME LOYEE •' 2 . PA / I BAY %4 SPAE6/BAY 4 J REPAIR GARAGE, i RUI I i - yy� L 4J q 2 giLOYEES X I SPACE%EMPLOWE• 2 I EQUIPMENT SHELTER, I 1 EMPLOYEE % I SPACE19/PLMEE I L {jllil TOTAL REWIRED PARKING 3P E$ I$ PARKING,SPACES PROVIDED I. STANDARDSTALL'NI' % ENI' IB 'fAleEp JLWQYIRM) I PARKING SPADES.PROVIDED HANDICAPPED STALLS 12.8' % PA' - '4 Mir TOTAL PARKING SPACES PBOYIC SOvlwb .S. iFkm � i E LLW A'YF.1 `--IN14eGB,P iuN'MP7 ReARRIaI%1!t Y i - M"LIDO .. aeerere NCTae sir ' cor a./ AP-VW . . .. - w/f NAeeis ' .PROPOSED Sa�LIkN WITH PARIG� I w R '9 OF T4V2�� PROPERTYSUiM ED FOR TI •ARAM JU -� PLANT MATERIALS 'PROPERTY ARVETEB FOR ART VA V, JUNGE. INC.' PREPARED By 23/84CK VAN SUri. L.S. ND. 28826 DATED 9/23/8. AND UST ��-'' REVISED 4114/89. �' 'AIR COBA YYi egSJA9Gl . i •('� M PYRA 9TbltlReea NF1A:Y1 SONG r1xE S`-eve.e a• o.e. SIE DATA OT IS-1 GyM,, K 1 AV'Ok R a rim ram NIMIM ME a• A•1e.e a� O.c. ].C.T.M•Gy,, D 1-f MVPN rwE u- dva.e S' e TII�UDE, ;1GD Y�LOINEwYQRK Re rN a MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LOT AREA • 4$.$89 S.F. - 1.04 AG-S 'WWI Al MAY BE •LPIdENiEp WH IPICEA Y.ERIt. GOLgppO KYF YRUCEI I It"Eml.III.AVAmA9e.m aF Purr MAI.-Z AT 114Y-Q ITAm . CUTCHOGUE SITE ONE DATA..LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL REOUIRED PROVIDE SITE PLAN EXHIBIT LOT SIZE 40.0p00p $F 4$.399 SF COUNTY ROUTE 48. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LOO BETH ISO 25Z. SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK BEAYARD 20 143• - I Y DATE OCTOBER 18. 1991 BOTH SIDE YARD 45 IT4.- I A$ SI%/!IN REM YSED TO 24:• - SCALE • S K3 FOR PROPOSED NYNE% RADIO EQUIPMENT � eae� s N BUILDING Q 11/19/91 EVISED PER PLANNING EGAI COMMENTS DIG NO 92-MZ REV. NO. DATE DESCRIPTIM RICHARD EL P:E,N0. 066087-1 SHEET I OF I MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSrgsooryo P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI �Q �� Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N -1hC Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G �O 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR y�ou�v, Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 13, 2012 Mr. Richard Comi 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re: Verizon Wireless Up-grades @ Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Comi: The Planning Department is in receipt of an application to up-grade Verizon Wireless antennas and equipment at an existing wireless facility with equipment area on an existing monopole. Pursuant to §280-130A of the Southold Town Code, the Planning Department is seeking to provide a brief report to the Building Department concerning the proposed wireless communications up-grades and whether or not this application warrants full site plan review. Verizon proposes to replace nine (9) existing antennas on the existing monopole with nine (9) replacement antennas at the same height as presently existing, replace two (2) GPS units on the existing equipment shelter With two (2) new GPS units, and install additional equipment inside its existing equipment shelter. For your convenience, enclosed is a paper copy of the file. It is also available on our website (southoldtown.northfork.net, Laser Fiche, Planning, Applications, Site Plans, In Progress, 1000- 96-1-19.1). Please provide an estimate for the cost of your consulting services to determine whether the application meets the General Requirements in the Southold Town Code for maximum permissible exposure. Should the Planning Board approve your estimate, a purchase order will be provided authorizing this application's review to begin. Please, do not start any review until you are authorized to do so in writing. If you have any question or comments, please contact me. Best regards, Brian Cummings Planner cc: Planning Board/Heather Lanza, Planning Director Al Tagliaferri w/pkg. FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY • R; qL I l J C i SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: _/ DJ2 Date Sent:_r��/�� Project Name: _ Jf <T, Project Address: C1.4 P 8 x1 Suffolk County Tax Map No.:100016_-_j _- Zoning District — Request: o+ +– — (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted:_Qs Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: Signature of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / / Date of Comment: Comments: MAY 24 2W 1 I Signature of Planning Dept.-Staff Reviewer Final Determination Date:—/—/ Decision: RinnniurA of Rnildino InRnArtor RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FAcsIMTLE: (631) 425-4104 OF GOUNSEL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN May 23, 2012 By Hand Mr. Michael Verity MAY 2 4 2012 Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") Proposal to modify existing telecommunications facility at Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCfM#: 1000—96— 1 — 19.1 Dear Mr. Verity: We are the attorneys for Verizon in connection with its proposal to upgrade its existing facility at the subject premises. The modification proposed is part of Verizon "LTE" project which will allow Verizon to provide better, faster and more reliable service in the Town. The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, codified at 47 United States Code §1455, a copy of which is enclosed, provides that "a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." This proposal is an "eligible facilities request" pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §1455(a)(2) as it proposes only to replace and collocate certain transmission equipment. Specifically, Verizon proposes to replace nine (9) existing antennas on the existing monopole with nine(9) replacement antennas at the same height as presently existing. replace two (2) GPS units on the existing equipment shelter with two (2) new GPS units, and install additional equipment inside its existing equipment shelter. As such, we respectfully submit that the proposed modification will not "substantially change the physical dimensions" of the existing monopole or base station. Moreover, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, codified at 47 United States Code § 332, as interpreted by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") in its Declaratory Ruling 09-99 and Order On Reconsideration 10-144, requires that applications such as Verizon's be processed within 90 days. We enclose the following in support of the proposed eligible facilities request: I. Town of Southold Building Permit Application form detailing the eligible facilities request; 2. Owner's Authorization Affidavit; 3. Building Permit Application fee: Check of Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP (Check No. 1325) in the amount of$500.00; New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Proposal to modify existing facility at 21855 C.R. 48, Cutchogue May 23, 2012 Page 2 of 2 4. Two (2) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group and dated March 27, 2012, demonstrating the project's compliance with the FCC's Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations; 5. Two (2) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report with design drawings, prepared by GPD Group, dated April 19, 2012, documenting the facility's structural compliance with local, state and federal codes; 6. Copy of Verizon's FCC Licenses; 7. Copy of Deed; 8. Copy of Lease Supplement between Crown Atlantic Company LLC and New York SMSA Limited Partnership, dated March 31, 1999; 9. Copy of Verizon's Certificates of Occupancy Nos. Z-24388 and Z-24389, both dated May 30, 1995; 10. Copy of Verizon's Planning Board Resolution, dated April 7, 1992 approving Amended Site Plan Application; 11. Copy of Verizon's Board of Appeals Resolution, dated December 5, 1991, together with copies of Board of Appeals Decisions Nos. 4058 and 4062, both dated November 21, 1991. 12. Copy of property survey prepared by Arek Surveying Company, dated June 4, 2009; and 13. Four (4) sets of Construction Drawings with Site Plans and Elevations, prepared by ATP Engineering, dated April 6, 2012. We respectfully request that the instant proposal be processed in accordance with the above and that the appropriate Permit be issued at this time. We respectfully request that our office be contacted when the Permit is ready to be picked up. We can be reached at(631) 425-4100. Very truly yours, RG, NIELSFN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP hn ou hlin JC:mk Enclosures Cc via e-mail w/o encls.: Ms. Heather Lanza, Planning Director United States Code J United States Code ;J TITLE 47—TELEGRAPHS.TELEPHONES.AND RADIOTELEGRAPHS JCHAPTER 13—PUBLIC SAFETY CO MUNICATIONS AND ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM AUCTIONS 47 U.S.C. § 1455. Wireless facilities deployment (a) Facility modifications (1) In general - Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104) or any other provision of law, a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. (2) Eligible facilities request - For purposes of this subsection, the term "eligible facilities request" means any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves - (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment. (3) Applicability of environmental laws - Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to relieve the Commission from the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act 116 U.5_C. 470 et seq. ] or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.c i3)i et sea.7 . (b) Federal easements and rights-of-way (1) Grant - If an executive agency, a State, a political subdivision or agency of a State, or a person, firm, or organization applies for the grant of an easement or right-of-way to, in, over, or on a building or other property owned by the Federal Government for the right to install, construct, and maintain wireless service antenna structures and equipment and backhaul transmission equipment, the executive agency having control of the building or other property may grant to the applicant, on behalf of the Federal Government, an easement or right-of-way to perform such installation, construction, and maintenance. (2) Application - The Administrator of General Services shall develop a common form for applications for easements and rights-of- way under paragraph (1) for all executive agencies that shall be used by applicants with respect to the buildings or other property of each such agency. (3) Fee (A) In general - Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the - Administrator of General Services shall establish a fee for the grant of an easement or right-of-way pursuant to paragraph (1) that is based on direct cost recovery. (B) Exceptions - The Administrator of General Services may establish exceptions to the fee amount required under subparagraph (A)- (a) in consideration of the public benefit provided by a grant of an easement or right-of-way; and (ii) in the interest of expanding wireless and broadband coverage. (4) Use of fees collected - Any fee amounts collected by an oxo(u,rive agency pursuant to paragraph (3) may be made available, as provided in appropriations Acts, to such agency to cover the costs of granting the 0 easement or right-of-way. (c) Master contracts for wireless facility sftings (1) In general - Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 or any other provision of law, and not later than 60 days after February 22, 2012, the Administrator of General Services shal`. - (A) develop 1 or more master contracts that shall govern the placement of wireless service antenna structures on buildings and other property owned by the Federal Government; and (B) in developing the master contract or contracts, standardize the treatment of the placement of wireless service antenna structures on building rooftops or facades, the placement of wireless service antenna equipment on rooftops or inside buildings, the technology used in connection with wireless service antenna structures or equipment placed on Federal buildings and other property, and any other key issues the Administrator of General Services considers appropriate. (2) Applicability - The master contract or contracts developed by the Administrator of General Services under paragraph (1) shall apply to all publicly accessible buildings and other property owned by the Federal Government, unless the Administrator of General Services decides that issues with respect to the siting of a wireless service antenna structure on a specific building or other property warrant nonstandard treatment of such building or other property. (3) Application - The Administrator of General Services shall develop a common form or set of forms for wireless service antenna structure siting applications under this subsection for all executive agencies that shall be used by applicants with respect to the buildings and other property of each such agency. (d) Executive agency defined - In this section, the term "executive agency" has the meaning given such term in section 102 of title 40. ( Pub.L. 112-96, title VI, Sec. 6409, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 232. 1 REFERENCES IN TEXT Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, referred to in subsets. (a) (1) and (c) (1), is section 704 of Pub.L. 104-104, which amended section 332 of this title and enacted a provision set out as a note under section 332 of this title. The National Historic Preservation Act, referred to in subset. (a) (3), is Pub.L. 89-665, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Star. 915, which is classified generally to subchapter II (Sec. 470 et seq.) of chapter lA of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 470(a) of this title and Tables. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subset. (a) (3), is Pub.L. 91-190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat_ 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (Sec. 4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables. Copyright©2012 CCN Incorporated or its affiliates TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of New York SMSA Limited AUTHORIZATION Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless OF OWNER At the premises: 21855 County Road 48 North side of County Road 48, west of Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF Ile) ) SS.: COUNTY OF ) Arthur V. Junge, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am the owner in fee of the premises known as Section 96,Block 1,Lot 19.1 (the"Premises" hereafter), and do hereby authorize New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ('Verizon Wireless' hereafter), and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal approvals as may be necessary for the upgrade/modification of its public utility wireless telecommunications facility. As such,I willfully cooperate with Verizon Wireless and its agents in obtaining any required Approvals. km-&�By. p Sworn to before me this \\\\\\\\\ y IIMllllr�^�///////,/i °fes day of /j1 2012 g� .•SSt TE 40 P, -Arv. s f,O, PIRS10N n11Ufl fl�lh- /`'GYVIi-nxE/�`Ilun _ IXMHES t AWUST24 W; NOTAAY PUBLIC ' 0- 2016 js•. YAMPS51 �'Q�'��� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631)765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Flood Permit Examined 120_ Storm-Water Assessment Form_ Contact: Attorney for Applicant: . Approved ,20_ Mail to: Re,Nielsen,Huber&Coughlin,LLP Disapproved a/c 36 N.New York Ave.,Huntington,NY 11743 Phone: 631-425-4100 Expiration ,20_ Building Inspector LICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT MAY 2 3 2012 Date G3 20 7Z INSTRUCTIONS BLDG.DEPT. This kWi6kV6iJJNdl1ST be com letely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans,accurate plot plan to sca e. ee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas,and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant.Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described.The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,building code,housing code,and regulations,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (Signature of applicant or name,if a 149ax Limited Partnership 4 Centerock Road,West Nyack,NY 10994 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent,architect,engineer, general contractor, electrician,plumber or builder Applicant is Lessee Name of owner of premises Arthury )unge limited partnership (As on the tax roll or latest deed) ifapn�icgrl a rpus,si�(1a�urC {duly guthprued officer eaT' yc J A t tte arhterspan /a Ve �t W eless (Name and title oftrorpomtex Builders License No. Plumbers License No. N/A Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue House Nutrlper Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 96 Block I Lot 19.1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Commercial and public utility wireless telecommunications facility b. Intended use and occupancy Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility 3. Nature of work(check which applicable):New Building Addition Alteration Repair Removal. Demolition Other Work Lessee/Applicant propose to modify/upgrade its exisin�xublic utilitywirelyi�tgle�communjCation�lgciliv8y8 eglacin�gine 911 existing aTi tins with.nine 49 A�4{ 'A new ante as,re acin [wo l C,P amts wtth two ))ne nrtsp!n ins a ling one atlddrt"onal equtpmen c t [sting shelter. 4. Estimated Cost s360000 (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units N/A Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars Commercial and public utility wireless telecommunications 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of usef4dhty 7. Dimensions of existing structures,if any:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories / 45,589 square feet 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase 4/6/1987 Name of Former Owner Timothy Ston Gray — 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated Light Industrial District 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation?YES_NO X 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises?YES X NO 418 Moulton Hill Rd. 14.Names of Owner.of premises Arthur V.JunRe Address Lyman NH 03585_ Phone No. 603-838-8982 3 Saddlebrook Dr. Phone No 860-663-1697 Name of Architect APT Engineering Address ingwort t, TT 06419—phone No. Name of Contractor Addres\ 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO X * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland?* YES NO x * IF YES,D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below,must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES X NO * 1F YES,PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OFT-ic .i being duly swom,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract)above named, ;�:• "- p a' <. (S)He is the Lessee/Applicant (Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief,and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this I S20 Z day of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless r By: 9 =-42! C �rto Notary Public Signature of-Applicant Michael R. Bonhomme . Notary Public, State of New York Print Name/Title above No.01806144229 Qualified in Orange County Commission Expires 04/24/20'f D�CLAMTION Of COVIMMI AND UITAICTiON4 THi4 D4CLAAATI0N DMW by ARTHUR V. JUNG$. this day of Kam ch,., 1918,,_, (1) residing at _ 1880 Nassau Pcint Aoad, Cutehoaue, Nnx York 11939 (1) a dorsiatie or foreign corporation with offices located at +, (3) a sole, proprietorship or partnership having its principal place r: of business at `? hereinafter Merged to ae the DSCLANW# as the owner of promises described in Schedule •A" annexed hereto (heyslrnaftsr rafersrid to i as the PR4141480) dsairns to restrict .the use and enjoyment of said , taxis&$ and has for such purposes determined tb impose on said ImmilRs covenants and restrictions and does hereby dealers that said P1WUst3 shall be held and shell be conveyed subject to the following covenants and restrictions 1. DICLMANT has We application to the Outtalk county Ospastmsnt of malth Services (herainatter raterred to as the DtPARTJOW) far a pert to construct, approval of plans or approval of a subdivision or develo nt pea on the PR111Ia1a. ag►i i (#CDHa an COV 10/11) A. '7� '• i 592 KMa'.:.,. 2. "110" 1 MMASS TO u INSRRTSD "M -- In SAME lARAGMPN/ 2N RRAR} , WHERSAB the DECLARANT is constructing a building at (Schedule A) All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Cutahogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New Stork, being more particularly bounded and described as follower BEGINNING at a point on the northwest line of Niddle Road, (C.R. 48) 750 feet more or fess southwesterly along said line from Cox's Lane, Bald point being the southeast corner of the premises heroin described and the south- west corner of other land of the party of the first parte RUNNING THENCE, along the northwest line of Noddle Road, (C.R. 4e) , South 25 degrees 52 minutes 30 seconds West, 168,17 feet to land of Harriss RUNNING THENCE along said land North 60 degrees 54 minutes 20 seconds Nest, 252.68 foot to land of the Town of Southoldt RUNNING THENCE along said land North 23 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds Rest, 188. 15 foot to land of the party of the first parte RUNNING THENCE along said land South 56 degrees 17 minutes 10 seconds last, 263.16 feet to the point or place of 110INNING. The DECLARANT represents he is aware of the raquiraments met forth in ' Article VII of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. Should there be a change in ownership or a change in the operation, the DE,CLARAWT or his assigns or successors in interest must notify the Suffolk County Department of Nealth services, (SCM GIN COV 10/S6) _ r IC-592 e 34 The OWA A1hMo its successors and/or assigns Mall met forth thus covenants, agrewwats and. declarations in any end all leases to ocogpanss, tenants and/or lessees of the shove described Property and shell, by their %saw# subject same to the covenants and restrictions contained herein. *ailuro of the ML%PART, its successors and/or assigns to so condition the leaves shall root invalidate their automatio subjugation to ;the, covenants Md restr10ti0n04 A. All of the covenants and restrictions contained herein shall be construed to be in addition to and not In derogation or limitation upon any provisions } of local, state, and federal lava, ordinaness, and/or regulations in effect at the time of execution of this agreement, or at the ties such lam$ ordinances, and/or regulations may thereafter be revised, Mondeds or promulgated, D. This document is made subject to the provisions of all laws required by law or by their provisions to be incorporated herein and they are deemed to be Incorporated heroin and mads a part hereofr as though fully vet forth. (SCOW M COY 10/11) 3 4.1 10592 M4 ,.A�,, 6. The aforementioned RsetrictlVe Covenants shell be enforceable by the County of Suffolk, State of Now York, by injunctive relief or by any other remedy in equity or at law, The failure of said agencies or the County of Suffolk to enforce the save shall not be doGO@d to affect the validity of this covenant not to impose any liability whatsoever upon the County of Suffolk or any officer or employee thereof. 7. These covenants and restrictions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the OSCLARWf its successors and assigns, and upon all persons or entities claiming under them, and may be terminated, revoked or amended by the owner of the premises only with the written ooneant of the OSlAW MSST. I. If any section, subssotlon, paragraph, clause, phrase or provision of these covenants and restrictions shall, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, be adjudged 111ega1, unlawful, invalid, or held to be unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of these covenants as a whole, at any other part or provision hereof other than the part so adjudged to be illagal, unlawful, Invalid, or unconstitutional, ($Coxa 0ap COV 10/16) 4 a 10592 ,PISS 9. Local Law 133-1900 - The DICLARANT represents and warrants that he has not offered or gtm any gratuity to any Official, eNployee, or &goat of Ouffolk County, In York Mata, or of any political party, with the purpose of intent of securing favorable treatsent With respeat to the performace Of an agreeannt, and that such parson has read and is familisr with the provisions Of Local Law 934-1990. La i <a LS t� !2 •.4 i i 000N GIN COV 10/061 ! "'' FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No E-24389 Date MAY 30, 1996 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ACCESSORY Location of Property 21855 COUNTY ROAD 448 CUTCHOGUE NY .House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 96 Block 1 Lot 19.1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated AUGUST 13, 1991 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 20540-E dated APRIL 10, 1992 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued ie AN ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT SHED AS APPLIED FOR UNDER EBA APPEAL 44058 Q 4062. The certificate is issued to ARTHUR V. JUNGE (owner) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N237927 JUNE B, 1992 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A ,- 0 , Z4- AVwilding Inspector Rev. 1/81 %( =o�osuFFot,��o�� 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS to Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman �?, • Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. �O! `�� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (5 16) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7, 1992 Marie Ongioni Attorney At Law 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Amended Site Plan for NYNEX Mobile Communications and Arthur V. Junge, Inc. Proposed Amendment to Approved Site Plan for Arthur V. Junge Industrial Building NIS County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCTM#1000-96-1-19 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 6, 1992. WHEREAS, Arthur V. Junge, Inc. is the owner of the property known and designated as Arthur V. Junge Industrial Building SCTM#1000-96-1-19, located at 21855 County Road 48 in Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on September 13, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8) , Part 617 , declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on February 24, 1992; and WHEREAS, a Special Exception was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on November 21, 1991; and r Page 2 NYNEX Mobile Communications WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector on March 3, 1992; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated November 19, 1991, subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Enclosed please find a copy of the map that was endorsed by the Chairman. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly /yours, Bennett OOy5 Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. CC: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Scott Russell,. Town Assessors Office �o��g11FFOLlrri SCOTT L. HARRIS 2 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SUPERVISOR P.O. Box 1179 a0 Z Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765 - 1823 TELEPHONE(516)765- 1800 BOARD OF APPEALS : Gerard P. Goehringer, Ch. OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Charles Grigonis, Jr. TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio , Jr. Robert A. Villa TO: Planning Board December 5, 1991 The following is certified to be a Resolution of the Board of Appeals duly adopted at its November 21, 1991 Meeting: BE IT RESOLVED, that the application for variances concerning the northerly rear yard setback and the westerly side yard setback in the proposed establishment of a public utility for the construction of a cellular telephone communications tower and accessory equipment-storage building as applied under Appl. No. 4058 in the Matter of NYNEX/ARTHUR V. JUNGE, INC. , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, also applicable to the Special Exception simultaneously rendered herewith: 1. No excessive (disturbing) noise levels; 2. No expansion or additional construction (with the exception of emergency, fire or police necessities which serve the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order to the town) , unless further application and approvals are obtained, and for which engineering certifications will be required concerning increased loads, winds pressures and other safety considerations for such expansion; 3 . No microwave dishes, as agreed by the applicants (none of which are proposed during the consideration of this application) ; 4. No disturbing emissions of electrical discharges, light, vibration or noise, or harmful distribution levels of radiation, as agreed. 5 . The setbacks shall be not less than that applied for and shown on the plan dated October 18, 1991 (Drawing No. 92-8012) prepared by Richard E. Tangel, P.E. , from the northerly property line. This resolution was duly adopted. Vii• n CERTIFIED BY: �Lknda F. Kowalski, Confidential Clerk of the Southold Town Board of Appeals N1NN�0 SCOTT L. HARRIS v �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SUPERVISOR Y w r ,:nil 2 'i P.O. Boa 1179 y 1 Southold. New York 11971 FAX(516)765 - 1623 ? "pi �,"•'�' TELEPHONE(516)765 - 1800 • T BOARD OF APPEALS : OFFICE OF THE AOARD OF APPEALS Gerard P. Goehringer TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Chairman 765-1809 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 4058: NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS/ARTHUR V. JUNGE, INC. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XIV, Section 100-142 for permission to construct monopole radio tower and accessory equipment-storage building with insufficient side and rear yard setbacks. Zone District: Light Industrial (LI) . Location of Property: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-96-1-19.1. WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held on October 24, 1991, and at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: I. The premises .in question is located in the Light Industrial (LI) Zone District in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, and is more particularly identified as County Tax Map District 1000, Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1. 2. The subject premises consists of a total area of 1.04 acres (or 45, 598 sq. ft. ) with a frontage of 168 feet along the north side of County Route 48 and a lot depth of 252+- feet. This parcel is improved with an existing building and uses which were the subject of a conditional approval by the Board of Appeals under Appl. No. 3835 rendered April 27, 1989 and Appl. No. 3705 rendered March 3, 1988 (Arthur L. Junge, Inc. ) , as well as site plan approval by the Southold Town Planning Board. 3 . By this application, reduced setbacks are requested: (a) from the northerly rear yard and westerly side yard at 14 feet and 24+- feet, respectively for the 13 ' by 27 ' foundation of the proposed accessory storage building, and (b) from the northerly rear yard at 39+- feet and from the westerly side yard at 21+- feet for the foundation of the proposed monopole tower Page 2 - Appl AV 4058 • Matter of NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS Decision Rendered November 21, 1991 structure, all as more particularly shown on map of proposed site plan and details prepared by Richard E. Tangel, P.E. dated July 31, 1991. 4. The subject premises is located in the Light-Industrial (LI) Zone District, and the setbacks applicable are noted for a principal use structure at 70 from the rear property line and 20 for the side yard. 5. The following documentation and site plan information are noted for reference and consideration: (a) an existing tree (screening) line is shown along or very near the northerly and southerly lines of the subject property; pine-tree screening must be located along the westerly property line, as shown on the site plan maps; (b) also proposed is a stockade fence along the northerly and easterly sections of the proposed equipment storage building; (c) Certificates of Occupancy have been found of record for the existing uses as follows: ( 1) #Z17295 issued on September 13, 1988 for the electric shop/building of Arthur V. Junge; ( 2) #218981 issued on April 23 , 1990 for a wholeale bakery and for Local Talent, Inc. in the existing light-industrial building; (d) the proposed equipment storage building and tower structure will be unmanned, not requiring active daily parking for additional on-site personal or any increase of on-site customers related to the establishment of this public utility use; (e) other site plan elements are to be placed as conditioned by the Planning Board -under its simultaneously pending site plan application (see PB letter of 11/7/91) ; (f) New York SMSA Limited Partnership and NYNEX have furnished information for the record concernings its licensing as a public utility to provide cellular radio transmission serving to its full extent the public interest, convenience and necessary as per written consent and order authorized by the N.Y.S. Public Service Commission, Pederal Communications Commission, etc. , which includes limitation on the Effective Radiated Power for mobile transmitters up to 7 watts, and output power for mobile transmitters up to 60 watts. It is also not permitted to be assigned or transferred to any person, firm, company, or corporation without the written consent of the Commission; and it is understood that upon any future proposal of this applicant or owner(s) to transfer or assign this • • 0 4 " Paye 3 - Appl. No. 40580 Matter of NYNEX Mobile Communications/lunge becision Rendered November 21, 1991 authorization, subsequent application to this Board must be filed for consideration. 6. Other relevant technical information considered in this project are also noted below for the record: (a) cellular communication systems must operate through a network of cell sites, the first for this applicant in the Town of Southold at the subject premises in Cutchogue. (b) this cell site has two principal components, a 12' by 26 ft. ( 13 ' by 27' foundation) structure for computer equipment storage, and transmitting/receiving antenna-tower structure, both of which are incidental and necessary to operate a wire line telephone communications use. The top of the tower is 12 ft. equilateral triangle, 40 inches high, 36 inches at the base and 18 inches at the top. There would be two whip antennas that are 10 ft. above that, and one below. (c) the tower and building are monitored seven days a week, 24 hours per day per FCC mandates, although it is unmanned physically at the site. (d) the tower and antenna are solely for use by this applicant/public utility and will not be rented or leased to any other corporation, person, firm or company. Also, it is expressly understood that no new cell, or expansion will be established, unless further application and approvals by this board and the regulating commissions, on this site in order that appropriate criteria may be evaluated, including engineering data relative to wind pressures, wind loads and other safety considerations for such future utility expansion; (e) the design of the tower and antenna submitted is not a steel lattice design; this monopole structure must, however, be designed to withstand continuous wind loads in excess of 150 mph and wind peaks of 190 mph or more (sufficiently mounted with wires and brackets capable to support these pressures) . 7. This date, a Special Exception was conditionally approved by this Board concerning the applicant' s request under Article XIII, Section 100-130 of the Light Industrial (LI) and Light Industrial-Office (LIO) Zoning Provisions for authorization to establish a telecommunications use by a public utility. Page 4 - Appl. No. 4058 r Matter of NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS Decision Rendered November 21, 1991 B. In considering this application, the Board also finds that the relief requested: (a) will not be adverse to the essential character of the neighborhood and is the minimum necessary to afford relief under the circumstances; (b) will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (c) will not increase dwelling unit density or cause a substantial effect on available governmental facilities; (d) cannot be obviated by another method feasible to appellant to pursue, other than a variance (e) is uniquely related to the property and is not personal in nature; (f) in considering all of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT relief for the reduced setbacks requested and noted above on the first page, paragraph #3, in the Matter of the Application of NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: RESOLVED, that the application for a Special Exception for the establishment of a public utility for the construction of a cellular telephone communications tower and accessory equipment-storage building as applied under Appl. No. 4062 in the Matter of NYNEX/ARTHUR V, JUNGE, INC. , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. No excessive (disturbing) noise levels; 2. No expansion or additional construction (with the exception of emergency, fire or police necessities which serve the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order to the town) , unless further application and approvals are obtained, and for which engineering certifications will be required concerning increased loads, winds pressures and other safety considerations for such expansion; 3. No dishes, as areed by the icrowave Of which aremproposed during the consideration ofpthis,lican (none application) ; Page 5 - Appl. No. B Matter of NYNEX Mobi-e Communications/lunge Decision Rendered November 21, 1991 application) ; 4 . No disturbing emissions of electrical discharges, light, vibration or noise, or harmful distribution levels of radiation, as agreed. 5 . The setbacks shall be not less than that applied for and shown on the plan dated October 18, 1991 (Drawing No. 92-8012) prepared by Richard E. Tangel, P.E. , from the northerly property line. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MESSRS. GOEHRINGER, GRIGONIS, DOYEN AND VILLA. (MEMBER DINIZIO ABSTAINED FROM DISCUSSIONS AND FROM VOTE) . This resolution was duly adopted. * k lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN 1%i E" �I D AND FILED BY Yl E SOUTHGLD TOWN ClXj1% DATE 1'21131F, HOUR F '3O A M Town Clerk, Town of Southold APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L.HARRIS ^ Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman G, Supervisor Charles Grigonls,Jr. Serge Doyen,Jr. `_� ' Town Hall,53095 Main Road �� Z_ „$ James Dinizio,Jr. `^ P.O.Box 1179 Robert A.Villa "✓f,' '� Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone (516)765-1809 '`: Telephone(516)765-1800 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD Appl. No. 4062 . NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS/ARTHUR V. JUNGE, INC. Request for Special Exception approval under Article XIV, Section 100-141B( l) for permission to establish public utility use and construct monopole radio tower and accessory equipment-storage building. Zone District: Light Industrial (LI) . Location of Property: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-96-1-19.1. WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held on October 24, 1991, and at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact and determination: 1. The premises in question is located in the Light Industrial (LI ) Zone District in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, and is more particularly identified as County Tax Map District 1000, Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19. 1. 2 . The subject parcel contains a total area of 1.04 acres (or 45,589 sq. ft. ) with a frontage of 168 feet along the north side of County Route 48 and a lot depth of 252+- feet. This parcel is improved with an existing building and uses which were the subject of a conditional approval by the Board of Appeals under Appl. No. 3835 rendered April 27, 1989 and Appl. No. 3705 rendered March 3, 1988 (Arthur L. Junge, Inc. ) , as well as site plan approval by the Southold Town Planning Board. 3 . By this application, a Special Exception is requested for . . .construction of an equipment building and monopole for cellular mobile communications. . . ", both of which are public Page 2 - Novc er411, 14974 • k , Matter of NYNEX/ARTHUR JUNGE, INC. Decision Rendered November 21, 1991 utility structures providing a public telephone communications service. 4. Reference is made to the following documents and site plan information submitted for the record: (a) Certificate of Occupancy #Z17295 issued by the Building Inspector on September 13 , 1988 has been provided for the existing electric shop of Arthur V. Junge and building. (b) Certificate of Occupancy #218981 issued by the Building Inspector on April 23, 1990 has been provided for a wholesale bakery and in the existing light industrial building to Local Talent, Inc. (c) the proposed equipment storage building and tower structure will be unmanned, not requiring active daily parking for on-site personnel or customers related to this use. (d) an existing tree line is shown along or very near the northerly and southerly lines the property; pine-tree screening shall be along the westerly property line. (e) also proposed a stockade fence along the northerly and easterly sections of the proposed radio equipment storage building; ( f) other site plan elements will be provided as may be determined by the Planning Board under its simultaneously pending site plan application {see PB letter of 11/7/91) . (g) New York SMSA Limited Partnership and NYNEX have furnished information for the record concerning its licensing as a public utility to provide cellular radio transmission serving to its full extent the public interest, convenience and necessity as per written consent and order authorized by the N.Y.S. Public Service Commission, Federal Communications Commission, which includes limitation on the Effective Radiated Power for mobile transmitters up to 7 watts, and output power for mobile transmitters up to 60 watts. It is also not permitted to be assigned or transferred to any person, firm, company, or corporation without the written consent of the Commission, and it is understood that upon any future proposal of this applicant or owner(s) to transfer or assign this authorization, subsequent application to this Board must be filed for consideration. 5. Also noted are the following data: r Pagg 3 - Novembeal, �� • ` Matter of NYNEX/ARTHUR JUNGE, INC. Decision Rendered November 21, 1991 ;a) cellular communication systems must operate through a network of cell sites, the first for this applicant in the Town of Southold at the subject premises in Cutchogue. (b) this cell site has two principal components, a 12 ' by 26 ft. structure for computer equipment storage, and transmitting/receiving antenna-tower structure, both of which are incidental and necessary to operate a wire line telephone communications use. The top of the tower is 12 ft. equilateral triangle, 40 inches high, 36 inches at the base and 18 inches at the top. There would be two whip antennas that are 10 ft. above that, and one below. (c) the tower and building are monitored seven days a week, 24 hours per day per FCC mandates, although it is unmanned physically at the site. (d) the tower and antenna are solely for use by this applicant/public utility and will not be rented or leased to any other corporation, person, firm or company. Also, it is expressly understood that no new cell, or expansion will be established, unless further application and approvals by this board and the regulating commissions, on this site in order that appropriate criteria may be evaluated, including engineering data relative to wind pressures, wind loads and other safety considerations for such future utility expansion. (e) the tower and antenna shall not be constructed of steel lattice design, but shall be a monopole structure designed to withstand continuous wind loads in excess of 150 mph and wind peaks of 190 mph or more (sufficiently mounted with wires and brackets capable to support these pressures) . 6. Article XIII, Section 100-130 of the Light Industrial (LI ) and Light Industrial-Office (LIO) Zoning Provisions authorize this type of telecommunications use by Special Exception. The use of this proposed monopole tower and accessory equipment storage building would include, to some extent, telephone exchanges. Although a telephone exchange is listed as a permitted use in the Light Industrial (LI) Zone District, this application for public utility structures and uses does require a special exception as provided by Article XIV, Section 100-141B( 1) and Article XIII, Section 100-131B( 4) for " . . . Public Utility Structures and uses. . . ." The Special Exception provision is applicable to this proposed project, and has been filed and considered under this provision. 7. In passing upon this application, the Board Members have also considered Sections 100-264, subsections A through P, and have found and determined the following: Page 4 - Appl - fo*062 i • { , Matter of NYNEX Mobile Communications/Junge Decision Rendered November 21, 1991 (a) That the proposed use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (b) That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts; (c) That the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; (d) That the use will be in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter; (e) That the use will be compatible with its surroundings, with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance and the fact that the property is bounded on the north by the Town Landfill, south by a major dual-lane highway, and bounded by other properties also located in the Light-Industrial Zone District. NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the application for a Special Exception for the establishment of a public utility for the construction of a cellular telephone communications tower and accessory equipment-storage building as applied under Appl. No. 4062 in the Matter of NYNEX/ARTHUR V. JUNGE, INC. , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. No excessive (disturbing) noise levels; 2. No expansion or additional construction (with the exception of emergency, fire or police necessities which serve the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order to the town) , unless further application and approvals are obtained, and for which engineering certifications will be required concerning increased loads, winds pressures and other safety considerations for such expansion; 3 . No microwave dishes, as agreed by the applicants (none of which are proposed during the consideration of this Page 5 - Appl. No. 4060) • • Matter of NYNEX Mobile Communications/lunge Decision Rendered November 21, 1991 application) ; 4. No disturbing emissions of electrical discharges, light, vibration or noise, or harmful distribution levels of radiation, as agreed. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MESSRS. GOEHRINGER, GRIGONIS, DOYEN AND VILLA. (MEMBER DINIZIO ABSTAINED FROM DISCUSSIONS AND FROM VOTE) . This resolution was duly adopted. * * k GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN NY CUTCHOGUE LEASE SUPPLEMENT (Formation Agreement Properties) This Lease Supplement("Supplement"), made this 31st day of March, 1999 between CROWN ATLANTIC COMPANY LLC with its principal office located at 510 Bering Drive,Suite 500, Houston,Texas 77057,hereinafter designated LESSOR and NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,with its principal office at c/o Bell Atlantic Mobile, 180 Washington Valley Road, Bedminster,New Jersey 07921, hereinafter designated LESSEE. I. This Supplement is a Supplement as referenced in that certain Global Lease Agreement between Crown Atlantic Company LLC and Cellco Partnership,dated March 31, 1999("Agreement"). All of the terms and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated hereby by reference and made a part hereof without the necessity of repeating or attaching the Agreement. In the event of a contradiction, modification or inconsistency between the terms of the Agreement and this Supplement,the terms of this Supplement shall govem. Capitalized terms used in this Supplement shall have the same meaning described for them in the Agreement unless otherwise indicated herein. 2. The Property leased by the LESSOR to the LESSEE hereunder is described as follows: Being part of the premises located at 21855 Country Road, Cutchogue, New York, and more particularly described on Exhibits 1 and 2 attached hereto and made a part hereof,together with such rights of access and ingress and egress as set forth in the Agreement;and such rights of way,easement or paths (i) presently utilized by Lessee or depicted on Exhibit 2 to be used by Lessee for utilities,grounding and/or similar connections in regard to the use of Lessee's equipment, improvements, appurtenances and/or operations at the Property, and/or(ii)associated with the construction,maintenance and/or operation of Lessee's Communications Facility or facilities or uses incidental thereto, as authorized by the Agreement. Exhibit I sets forth the location on the tower of the Lessee's equipment,together with the number and type of antennas, length and width of cables and size of equipment area. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Supplement or in the Agreement,LESSEE shall have the right, without additional payment or compensation in excess of that provided for in Paragraph 5 hereof,to relocate its antennas and other equipment to an alternate location on such tower,provided,however, that such space is available and the said relocation does not create measurable interference to current tenants on the tower. Lessee will be responsible for all costs and expenses incurred by it to relocate the equipment. Upon such relocation,the description of the Property shall be amended to reflect the new location. 3. In the event an Exhibit 2 is attached hereto describing the Property, the LESSEE shall have the right at LESSEE's option,to survey the Property and said survey shall then become Exhibit 3 which shall be attached hereto and made a pan hereof and shall control in the event of any discrepancies between it and Exhibit 2. The cost for such work shall be borne by the LESSEE. 4. The term of this Supplement shall be as set forth in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Agreement. 5. The rental for the first year of the initial term pursuant to this Supplement shall be due at an annual rental of 4to be paid in equal monthly installments on the first day of the month, in advance,to or to such other person, firm or place as the LESSOR may, from time to time, designate in writing at least thirty(30)days in advance of any rental payment date. The Commencement Date is defined as the first(1st)day of the month in which this Supplement is executed by all parties or the first(Ist)day of the month in which LESSEE is granted a building permit by the governmental agency charged with issuing such permits. whichever event occurs last.On each anniversary of the commencement date during the initial term,the annual rent shall be increased as set forth on Schedule A of the Agreement. 6. On each anniversary of the commencement date during the extension terms, the annual rate shall be increased as set forth on Schedule B of the Agreement. 7, For LESSEE sites which are not"sectorized"(e.g.,sites where LESSEE's equipment consists of omni- directional antennas:The rates defined in Paragraph 5&6 above provide LESSEE with the right,at no additional cost,to convert each omni site to a 3 sectored site at LESSEE's current location on the tower or at an alternate location on the tower specified by LESSEE,provided that the specified location is available and that the placement of antennas at this specified location does not interfere with other existing tenants on said tower. For LESSEE sites which do not currently include a GPS antenna: The rates defined in Paragraphs 5 &6 above provide LESSEE with the right,at no additional cost,to add one(I)GPS antenna at a location on the tower specified by LESSEE, provided that the specific location is available and that the placement of antennas at this specified location does not interfere with other existing tenants on said tower. In the event the LESSEE exercises any of its rights pursuant to the foregoing sentence(s),the LESSEE shall provide to the LESSOR a revised Exhibit I showing the change in equipment, which revised Exhibit I shall amend and supersede, to the extent of any inconsistency,the existing Exhibit L The foregoing right(s) are in addition to,and not in limitation or replacement of, any other rights LESSEE may have under this Supplement and the Agreement. S. Exhibit 2 sets forth a description of LESSEE's property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written. Signatures on the following pages. O ySDATnUVPPATA1SSI BELL6UIN9CUTCIIMU WM LESSOR: CROWN ATLANTIC COMPANY LLC By: 1� Name: Brian D.Jacks Title: President LESSEE:New York SI1SA Limited Partnership by Cellco Partnership, its managing general partner, by Bell Atlantic Mobile,Inc., its managing general partner David H. Benson Vice President and Chief Financial CHflcer Site Name: NY CUTCHOGUE EXHIBIT- 1 LEASE SUPPLEMENT Height on Tower: 100 ft. Number & Type of Antennas: (9) Directional (2) Omnidirectional (1) GPS Length & Width of Cable: 115' & 7/8" Equipment area: 12' X 26' 312 sq. ft.; together with space for Lessee's generator of approximately 75 square feet • GENERATOR ADDED AT LATER DATE NOT REFLECTED ON DRAWINGS # •;t � .��3 ,k.W �"yT "#�4 " "'er 't �;` s p ys.�y('.»rf a*r'n•n,.v• � .«f iar aif �.W.Jsil u+W, a<.wJ wr�✓ws •/..r MtE;�,4y�p�+'� �rd"jf'��y%b'. ., hlWH rnueW.NWN hCiOE SIGNNiG TNS IN1tNIMFNiFIM�M;M11�1` N ToS pmewmes.ir.adotw ti'4'H JaC^Ai �At'RTI. ,�.n 11 hugJrtda l ?+ .. r Fr s, a- t iF�1�t f717dT'11`' SCU7'T t`itrlY `Tt7.�`TI T11Q'.A'3' NP9r/. '�OU11D ,11!R111}Et �Y43.4 x.^, `� ,. $1i TN{J,yp� F7EY Y'L1RK,;.179'/1 "� 04 grtYy vS.l6e 6iyFMN aad • ARTHUR V. JUNCL RR$ILtIN� btl9�0 RA$ l�ilfl#f$ .f i f � Ytbm, t7;Tr.41tN.'i/i', NLY1 Y6RK. J x r ' m ' � ts(Yda ^ t i (hctmt( n pall, f y . xf� .Ylyt .'� 5_f'S�Y4.w`ti►`IYf.H.,',h�r p.�.r$,tP'1,r;r gYi{ n, tem rdc:al7an of imi /lhliiart ItnJ i,IbYF :}RSiil,�wlr�1"���Y'+v P1 YIA'4•rWJI`1V1>i�lS h2l rfV�`M➢tNJ!'��l,n Uni4l�IC�l.�!'�4�Sn 1S�fJ �A • pn,a race ari.,➢t aleee+:�F+rt:iiJ YCtipa4 a€ul..pxn,ri lhr ..c tw7xti turaymr z•; ;. ..,` t 4. ,lmyn 1pJ Ileckgnfr `.,.iW+llurt crltna pkn 11'x"'+,r IWrc,ul A 1SnJ w,n Jrr,h( • fdteMen4- dx,,tedi 'ara.lap x➢1' n11��,pdK5J6<iF uUgaj6Zuotdn of "�"ou+tTo}d ounRY ^o$ e TPt§ X61 + dpd SzaB,t 6f ddw `�.SfrN� M,n ' mare p�rtacuY atly., l+oudc't}$IriJf "b � `V- k x a 6t 3 faNING at x i t ,Jft om rhe.=trbl ti wes nt`ori ,;traldl� �tdatl LCra 7S'+�k ° , ^JSO €c;pt"✓+ rrGrla+ along 3$id land Crbar :oY >t'ti3�,k'„ Point Dgivq, tl c_s9ilrlJtast >i�fner of =i�fe pre➢1.` es he c�±i daaci'>v16 e d n c Vis;. . ;. 3"a.a F. ve3t..cn'rner;.aY n'nM`3aasd of:the Fatty of the' first oArtQ Ni rtahh ,q fi 4 :.S�isturcs�^t.sC�R„4e ltrut ��7�8- f7 „eet-rrY �tatid fof 7ipx��ff4st"#c'�fitA$ Hy ":.�1,c ,8 Said iu„d "Nrii' :is a0ry'r�•zE 56 'm7rtwtr,r $0 56con¢3'.Ytq�¢q :� land o? Knw Tk,Wk, naWlaldr runhzkg tN8tSd8 a1dnB _sdlxtT >sJia ;Nd afkgPl4'e 14 AA;Ati O,T csee�onds BasL> ,+9$r1u,=EAet id tfd• , ''alt f' m cite First Qal t ruI11*ar s':;ts,nee a 'ang r lea{lbhr Soualt$6 ct w q_,«➢ien Sri 90conal& rsr 3$3 IS fee`f+ to3epitlt xar ¢lacsib 15f a � •.t s R; r.�� I�.F? 4 r'l 1 t�1 _; l _lk r I Y ,t ' P.✓v4 .i �M RRPA,3'n' #'� r Itk.R INI}a ar w..SeK'i.,in. Mt+•n31 d at,. rt hr po rq aY the 1111 pan o7 ,k•reJmte`a 1�x,'ae>s "„ ar•..0 A66 6rrt.raie wrti' ,�1•rheMtfh. e:;fir pa1atMl atk`cd,rny frt'A1 TofaTNLR-wil�ryllw V1Da* , 11 . eb'va`id yremaan:'E614i�Vt'4N -~$iy-7 „�,, 1'(311 +1 FS,:K Fr�x�4wMrq,>RuMMrwla the pin dlte�caeN pvuilie heai of wet�'en+�e nnJan,Slat -,-i'15� - dl iiu i�rt•.-W lxr rc wd`pM h➢ .0 'r�', ¢J : ,:W':{Ri a.r p.yr•d 6.F 3.N'pat tw.F,lhMk:SJI,IN Onn•al iht IuY f W'MI[IN f1UOt M,H+gr ne' . w#en[R,k,➢+d prrnatriclr ➢enfuashreJM anyway rhaltitt.aneepl an'tl➢rt7iiid• ' 'J, A311.Ia'pit,of Ihrlvft'w�n�n 6. p fti r a nh. cve of i t rA wk,11ea,lar mrewwh 1►N dti'pufy Jl -: r S", lic, St hr%psu 0 f t*w 9, and wl kmol Iht ry6f w tealVAJath tow y! i4er*64,_>Aaw JeaA Ni;Ai argakeJ 1isN ver UK 9➢+ptlk d pd,+`tN 'wN4�',h'ib/�M6WC4atot �nk wn>in'e✓•+^My�al areMiW JN�4nn rF A<M1/�N'enlMt MHu,eiukk�F W'!wd'pJ dlr toWd.lAt e+ iA1C Mr fYN i1S4V jYf(At, a •-; `' :, Y3_ ,,r•• r4-gn+;yMa"..sNfat.e +rw�+t erMcadil�M,kf"�he+c•w.dli.;eiW�raw�rh�tieYld'.,�€!!r$M' <1' F '. �. . ?�#fa,ij}auPaNY1rA prl ya;fidr eiva/w�€�dindydit ddJH+�Nu�? ►�,+ � ; '.. z#�.i Tim .a: rM1 M F 2 era�'ftti �r6 ! wx"F 7 >AfRli W mwYOK.COIasiY or NASSAU ss I erwi[tN Il�tgr rOK.CO�11fIT.a "Yy za 1�ee4i Na ': l t °7 Isplar me Unehef drd AFT;l .t t f •• urr i!t Ttl SCOTT RAY, I perunally nme i t -t 1 u a - ` -• > r.�f fr ai7�M1eha `' + derer:Sed n:tnd xlr b tae d tM M T �. +. W`rae i<4+T4 b 6e AK a.dts-duJ �. eaeiaxl tfr ta'4"r'G aratammt, sad eaaoxrrd�ed hart tsauled [hZ lagatlx � t rR i I' �y h er( JnF1t1 � .ti s nr tK i1C,STSirE GF NEyy r r -,f a ` �U: vortk `f IS AARCH S $l�R rte aRr'vtr catmiaM b if+f WacW Y0ax'rCO M'r�ol t ry r tis M + nr CA-*,CA-*, Iv e nx iJn({m tl 1.�diy,s$ bR1i+ s�M,,e bslart ars'' my d perbnally amei+a x Cia�'1: v kt � ac lq ,.}bi-. 'i r`rs hntsww:hw E+i►J ex dolt I. dsl depute awl the su6rsnMng W1 tad lbpl Fr >�y'rm lft1�' . e tid"tlri hr reoCes u ns' ixwn d'uMdep ie Yne M is'*w ihef�`s hr 4rpYs Y` ".i e� c a'r ��'. 'the aoepGatwir de+rnbW '< s ' t I `A '±? +' .r6n `rV r r-+e iitaaar olaeh rears the ismvwrRimtr�rax:tNr he - -r EKf+yz k"»'."'E 'sl<•. 1Oa•° s3" n :Iu„r°"h dtr s�f,'o� eed iaip,;;rrtbe thY t'K:xhl aIF.eA :`derchLsd t ed u ,.�irinior:. xisae3�ewpxufa eal (ha"n aes r ilre hh4rrs- Yfrr 6 Giea(dr Ears b(_darM7us d iid rotfssrr . ,f` "i liar art drt Ye s+pnd M ramk nc�rao M'.;hN'e rde•` the r stdey� l jl. l L isFgne aad deft � r2s z i ntdcr. � � 4 ' � � „�,_ t•�. �`r --./// t "vo. i + `.tlt\hN m•P �i a � k Es�j'. -1, x-�u 'd4 �f0� j rta#�wae�x x c oT 3UF�aot+r%fln T+ 11 j�i4fr'1H1 re.`TT ( PA'!, 0 SOU 7f11 P, Ert -' t •! ` zip prd��� 2rr 5+'L , ftjR P JII "t ✓ )y ..rtes w ta^eF. 11erUro17. if, ay L..rw ' » ..r _ { rQCIP9 NIG ✓_ /ilF y ,; 39 Wit,syr ►" a tcl* fkPysLLtPk,�1:W " p hnwnw` s'Y y xi , .i:fudiAeasfl!�� . ♦ J �4 �-: �� . gyyya s 'er s.". • r 11(10 01t{dtti> rr I lr F a r.16 11�7 t 4 :t I k x .:, 162 Federal Communications Commission o Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 0 f ' RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ATTN:REGULATORY CELLCO PARTNERSHIP 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY,#150 GASA5REG ALPHARETTA,GA 30009-7630 Call Sign File Number N D WQJQ696 0003864907 Radio Service WY-700 MHz Lower Band(Blocks A, FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0003290673 B,E) Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-26-2008 06-11-2009 06-13-2019 06-11-2009 i Market Number Channel Block Market Designator BEA010 A 0 t Market Name New York-No. New Jer.-Long Isl j r 1st Build-Out Date 2nd Build-Out Date 3rd Build-Out Date 4th Build-Out Date i 06-13-2013 06-13-2019 Waivers/Conditions: If the facilities authorized herein are used to provide broadcast operations,whether exclusively or in combination with other services,the licensee must seek renewal of the license either within eight years from the commencement of the broadcast serviceor within the term of the license had the broadcast service not been provided,whichever period is shorter in length, See 47 CFR§27.13(6). I I Conditions: Pursuant to§309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license,refer to the Spectrum and Market j Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System(ULS). To view the license record, go to the ULS homepage at http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home and select "License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-MB April 2009Page t of 1 155 OOMMU Federal Communications Commission o b Wireless Telecommunications Bureau L•t of f RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ATTN: REGULATORY CELLCO PARTNERSHIP 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY,#150 GASA5REG ALPHARETTA,GA 30009-7630 Call Sign File Number WQJQ689 0003865021 A Radio Service WU-700 MHz Upper Band(Block C) FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0003290673 Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-26-2008 06-I1-2009 06-13-2019 06-11-2009 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator REA001 C 0 Market Name Northeast 1st Build-Out Date 2nd Build-Out Date 3rd Build-Out Date 4th Build-Out Date 06-13-2013 06-13-2019 Waivers/Conditions: If the facilities authorized herein are used to provide broadcast operations,whether exclusively or in combination with other services,the licensee must seek renewal of the license either within eight years from the commencement of the broadcast serviceor within the term of the license had the broadcast service not been provided,whichever period is shorter in length. See 47 CFR§27.13(b). This authorization is conditioned upon compliance with section 27.16 of the Commission's rules Conditions: Pursuant to§309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license, refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System(ULS). To view the license record, go to the ULS homepage at http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home and select"License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-MB April 2009 Page 1 of I 121 Federal Communications Commission ( 1 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau LLt c RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE:CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ATTN: REGULATORY CELLCO PARTNERSHIP 1 120 SANCTUARY PKWY,#150 GASA5REG ALPHARETTA,GA 3C Call Sign File Number �NNG� WQBT539 0003864879 Radio Service CW-PCS Broadband FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0003290673 Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 02-28-2007 06-11-2009 01-03-2017 06-11-2009 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator BTA321 C 4 Market Name New York,NY 1st�12-07-02003 Date �2ndd-Out Date 3rd Build-Out Date Ah Build-Out Date Waivers/Conditions: This authorization is subject to the condition that,in the event that systems using the same frequencies as granted herein are authorized in an adjacent foreign territory(Canada/United States),future coordination of any base station transmitters within72 km(45 miles)of the United States/Canada border shall be required to eliminate any harmful interference to operations in the adjacent foreign territory and to ensure continuance of equal access to the frequencies by both countries. This authorization is conditioned upon the full and timely payment of all monies due pursuant to Sections 1.2110 and 24.71 I of the Commissions Rules and the terms of the Commission's installment plan as set forth in the Note and Security Agreement executed by the licensee. Failure to comply with this condition will result in the automatic cancellation of this authorization. Conditions: Pursuant to§309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C.§310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C.§606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license,refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System(ULS). To view the license record, go to the ULS homepage at http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home and select"License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 60I4VIR April 2009 Page t of 2 i • Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau o i `t** RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: VERIZON WIRELESS TELECOM INC. ATTN:REGULATORY SCANNED VERIZON WIRELESS TELECOM INC. 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY#150-GASA5REG ALPHARETTA,GA 30004 Call Sign File Number KNLF644 0003298939 Radio Service CW-PCS Broadband I FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0005798061 Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 02-28-2007 01-23-2008 01-03-2017 01-24-2008 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator BTA321 C 3 Market Name j f New York,NY 1st Build-Out Date 2nd Build-Out Date 3rd Build-Out Date 4th Build-Out Date 12-07-2003 01-03-2007 Waivers/Conditions: This authorization is subject to the condition that,in the event that systems using the same frequencies as granted herein are authorized in an adjacent foreign territory(Canada/United States),future coordination of any base station transmitters within72 km(45 miles)of the United States/Canada border shall be required to eliminate any harmful interference to operations in the adjacent foreign territory and to ensure continuance of equal access to the frequencies by both countries. I Conditions: Pursuant to§309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this licens7herein. Neither the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any e of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorizetherthe license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the onsAct of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or rred by§706 of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. To view the geographic areas associated with the license,go to the Universal Licensing System(ULS)homepage at http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls and select"License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-MB August 2007 Page I of I PINNACE TELECOM GROUP Professional and Technical Services kkcm Cawft ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT ANd REPORT PREPAREd FOR NEW YORk SMSA LIMITEd PARTNERShip d/b/A VERIZON WiREIESS "CUTChOqUE #274" SITE 21M COUNTRY ROAd EAST CUTCNOCUE, NY MARCh 27, 2012 14 RidGEdAIE Avenue - SOE 209 • CMAR Knolls, NJ 07927 • 973-451.1630 CONTENTS INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY 3 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA 5 COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS 8 COMPLIANCE CONCIUSION 13 CERTIFICATION 14 APPENdIX A. BAckgROUNd ON THE FCC MPE LIMIT APPENdIX B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUAIIFICATIONS 2 INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY At the request of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for the modification of an existing wireless base station antenna operation on an existing monopole at 21855 Country Road East, Cutchogue, NY. Verizon Wireless refers to the site as "Cutchogue # 274" and the antenna modifications are proposed so Verizon Wireless can effectively operate under its licensed frequencies including 700 MHz, 850 MHz, and 1900 MHz. The FCC requires wireless system operators to perform an assessment of potential human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the monopole supports other existing wireless antenna operations by, Sprint-Nextel, T-Mobile, AT&T and MetroPCS — the RF effects of which will be included in this compliance assessment. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula — and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case calculated result via the "plain-English" equivalent"times-below-the-limit factor". 3 The result of the FCC RF compliance assessment in this case is as follows: ❑ The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as modified, along with all the other antenna operations at the site, is 1.5621 percent of the FCC MPE limit — well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other words, even with the significant degree of conservatism incorporated in the analysis, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 64 times below the FCC limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. ❑ The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site satisfy the applicable criteria for controlling potential human exposure to RF fields, and the RF levels will be in clear compliance with the FCC regulations and limit concerning RF safety. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and incorporated assumptions, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ❑ relevant technical data on the Verizon Wireless antenna operations as modified, along with data on the other existing antenna operations at the site; ❑ a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ❑ the results of the analysis, and the compliance conclusion for the site. In addition, Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit, along with a list of FCC references on compliance, and Appendix B summarizes the expert qualifications of the author of this report. 4 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below provides the key compliance-related data for the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as proposed to be modified, at the site. J General Datao ... . Fre uenc Bands 700 MHz, 850 MHz and 1900 MHz Service Coverage Type Sectorized Antenna Type Directional Panel Antenna Centerline Hei ht AGL 105 ft. 7 in. 700 MHz Antenna Data Antenna Model Antel 70090/4CF Antenna Maximum Gain 13.1 dBi RF Channels per Sector 1 Transmitter Power/ RF Channel 40 watts 850 MHz Antenna Datawm xa Antenna Model Antel 70090/4CF Antenna Maximum Gain 13.1 dBi RF Channels per Sector 8 Transmitter Power/ RF Channel 20 watts „ a 1900 MHz Antenna Data 4 t ai Antenna Model Antel 171090/8CF Antenna Maximum Gain 16.6 dBi RF Channels per Sector 4 Transmitter Power/ RF Channel 16 watts Note that in the analysis, we will conservatively ignore the power-attenuation effects associated with the antenna cabling ("antenna line loss".) The antenna vertical-plane radiation pattern is used in the calculations of RF levels at ground level around a site. Figures 1 through 3 that follow show the vertical-plane radiation patterns of the antenna model proposed by Verizon Wireless. Note that in this type of diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. 5 • Figure 1. Antel BXA 70090/4CF Antenna—700 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern 0 deg horizon 1 5 dB/division J Figure 2.Ante[70090/4CF Antenna—850 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern ! ', 0 deg N % horizon � l 5 dB/ didsion 6 Figure 3. BXA 171090/8CF Antenna—1900 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern r 0 deg horizon i 5 dB /division As noted at the outset, there are other antenna operations at the site that we need to include in the compliance assessment, each of which involves directional panel antennas arranged for sectorized wireless service coverage. In the analysis for each of the wireless carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power in each of their respective FCC-licensed wireless frequency bands. Sprint-Nextel is licensed to operate in both the 851 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 851 MHz band, Sprint-Nextel uses as many as 12 RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum antenna input power of six watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Sprint-Nextel uses as many as six RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. T-Mobile (also known as Omnipoint) is licensed to operate in the 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz frequency bands. In the 1900 MHz band, T-Mobile uses a maximum of eight RF channels in each antenna sector, with a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts per channel. In the 2100 MHz band, T-Mobile uses two channels per sector, with a maximum of 40 watts of transmitter power per channel. 7 AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. MetroPCS is licensed to operate in the 2100 MHz frequency band, using as many as three RF channels per antenna sector with a maximum transmitter power of 24 watts per channel, and using one RF channel per antenna sector with a maximum transmitter power of 60 watts. COMP11ANCE ANAIY515 FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65') provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest — and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect' reflection, the worst-case approach. The formula for street-level RF compliance calculations for any given wireless antenna operation is as follows: MPE% _ (100 *TxPower * 10 (Gmax-vdlsc/l0) *4 ) / ( MPE *47c * R ) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public 8 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 10 (Gmax-vdisc/,o) = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest, referenced to any applied antenna mechanical downtilt; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient ground reflection, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (22= 4) MPE = FCC general population MPE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 4 below. antenna height from antenna bottom to 6.5' above ground level 0 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 4. MPE% Calculation Geometry 9 It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level — which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power, and at maximum channel capacity. In addition, the effects of antenna line loss are ignored wherever possible. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 66" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 10 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "perfect' field reflection from the intervening ground. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur—and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operator, with the worst-case result highlighted in bold in the last column. 11 Ground Verizon Verizon Verizon Sprint- Dscana Wireless Wireless Wireless TMPE%e PE MMPE%S Total (a 700 MHz 850 MHz 1900 MHz Nextel MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% ;; ;. 0 0.0016 0.0409 0.1064 0.0438 0.0015 0.0499 0.0105 0.2546 20 0.0037 0.0103 0.0587 0.1507 0.0334 0.1620 0.0021 0.4209 40 0.0070 0.0277 0.0007 0.0818 0.0334 0.1604 0.0562 0.3672 60 0.0264 0.1318 0.0070 0.1080 0.0736 0.1836 0.2372 0.7676 80 0.0168 0.0860 0.0186 0.0795 0.1089 0.6024 0.0443 0.9565 100 0.0023 0.0018 0.0047 0.2148 0.1275 1.0282 0.0520 1.4313 120 0.0387 0.0991 0.02400.4101 0.0367 0.3339 0.0635 1.0060 140 0.0816 0.2690 0.0058 0.4241 0.0463 0.1071 0.0364 0.9703 160 0.0999 0.3613 0.0010 0.2879 0.0033 0.4010 0.0359 1.1903 180 0.0960 0.3472 0.0104 0.1207 0.1467 0.8096 0.0315 1.5621 200 0.0708 0.2618 0.0058 0.1027 0.1392 0.7022 0.0214 1.3039 220 0.0438 0.1620 0.0013 0.0893 0.0754 0.3880 0.0406 0.8004 240 0.0222 0.0823 0.0001 0.0614 0.0571 0.2028 0.0517 0.4776 260 0.0131 0.0495 0.0002 0.0573 0.0779 0.0939 0.0397 0.3316 280 0.0091 0.0337 0.0001 0.0793 0.1175 0.0784 0.0155 0.3336 300 0.0122 0.0411 0.0047 0.1333 0.1455 0.1422 0.0143 0.4933 320 0.0188 0.0635 0.0095 0.2033 0.1345 0.2818 0.0225 0.7339 340 0.0286 0.0964 0.0144 0.2723 0.1197 0.2505 0.0334 0.8153 • 360 0.0257 0.0867 0.0130 0.2440 0.0758 0.4143 0.0398 0.8993 380 0.0344 0.1186 0.0234 0.2966 0.0682 0.3729 0.0381 0.9522 400 0.0483 0.1668 0.0274 0.2686 0.0289 0.5680 0.0346 1.1426 420 0.0594 0.2099 0.0261 0.2944 0.0263 0.5163 0.0276 1.1600 440 0.0544 0.1921 0.0239 0.2689 0.0380 0.7424 0.0192 1.3389 460 0.0674 0.2326 0.0200 0.2849 0.0348 0.6803 0.0177 1.3377 480 0.0621 0.2144 0.0185 0.2621 0.0320 0.6258 0.0122 1.2271 500 0.0723 0.2553 1 0.0078 0.2420 1 0.0295 0.5775 0.0112 1.1956 12 As indicated, even with the significant degree of conservatism built into the calculations, the maximum calculated RF level is 1.5621 percent of the FCC MPE limit—well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. A graph of the overall calculation results, provided below, probably provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line representing the calculated total MPE% results rises only slightly above the graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS 120 Normalized FCC MPE Limit 0 Total MPE% Results W 100 a 80 0 0 a 60 c m (7 40 w 0 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) COMPHANCE CONCLUSION According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and safe. The analysis in this case shows that the maximum calculated RF level from the combination of the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as modified, along with the other existing antenna operations at the site, is 1.5621 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level from the combination of antenna operations is more than 64 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. 13 The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. CERTIFICATION It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The new Verizon Wireless antennas, as detailed herein, like the original antennas, will not produce more radiation which will cause them to not be in compliance with the FCC regulations. Moreover, the combined RF effects from the antenna operations at this site are in compliance with the FCC regulations and limit concerning potential RF exposure. Aom4d—d—&:�) 3/27/12 Danie ollins Date Chief nicalOfficer 14 APPENdix A. BAckgROUNd ON TILE FCC MPE LIMIT FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community— notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 15 Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) (MW/CMI) (mW/cmz) 0.3- 1.34 100 100 1.34 - 3.0 100 180 / Fz 3.0 - 30 900/ Fz 180/ F2 30 - 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F /300 F/ 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population WE limits. Power Density (MW/CM2) 100 Occupational ------ General Public 5.0 1.0 0.2 ---_ I I I I I I I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency(MHz) Because the FCC's MPE limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 16 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. Note that the FCC "categorically excludes' certain types of antenna facilities from the routine requirement to specifically (i.e., mathematically) demonstrate compliance with the MPE limit. Among those types of facilities are cellular antennas mounted on any type of tower, when the bottoms of the antennas are more than 10 meters (c. 32.8 feet) above ground. The basis for the categorical exclusion, according to the FCC, is the understanding that because of the low power and the directionality of the antennas, such facilities — individually and collectively — are well understood to have no significant effect on the human environment. As a result, the FCC automatically deems such facilities to be in compliance. FCC References on Compliance 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. 17 0 Appli B. SUMMARY of EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC ...... ...... ........... Synopsis: *39 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RIF exposure e Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 14,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 * Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,300 times since 1997 *Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as by the FCC e B.E E., City College of New York(Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 a M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 * Bronx High School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: 9 Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: * Edwards & Kelcey, VP—RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 e Bellcore. Executive Director— Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 e AT&T (Corp. HQ), Director—Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 *AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor— Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RF Safety/ 9 Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: * Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards& Kelcey, and PTG e While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure e Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and other consulting I engineering firms Other Background., *Author. Microwave System Engineering(AT&T, 1974) e Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993) 9 National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA)—former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 * Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and International Who's Who in Information Technology 9 Published more than 35 articles in industry magazines --------------- 18 Date: April 19, 2012 GPD GROUP 6We.%k.51pr.,,.Nra f Oe`evel Irc. Greg Guzzie GPD Group Crown Castle 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2000 Corporate Drive Akron, OH 44311 Canonsburg, PA 15317 (330) 572-2137 (724) 416-2620 icheronisdd)gPdgrouP.com Subject: Structural Analysis Report Carrier Designation: Verizon Wireless Co-Locate Carrier Site Number: 274 Carrier Site Name: Cutchogue Crown Castle Designation: Crown Castle BU Number: 806579 Crown Castle Site Name: NY Cutchogue Crown Castle JDE Job Number: 183351 Crown Castle Work Order Number: 482571 Crown Castle Application Number: 145544 Rev. 2 Engineering Firm Designation: GPD Group Project Number: 2012775.806579.01 Site Data: 21855 Country Rd., Cutchogue, NY 11935, Suffolk County Latitude 41° 1'46.57", Longitude -720 29'50.29" 100 Foot—Modified EEI Monopole Tower w/8.5' Extension Dear Greg Guzzie, GPD Group is pleased to submit this "Structural Analysis Report" to determine the structural integrity of the above mentioned tower. This analysis has been performed in accordance with the Crown Castle Structural 'Statement of Work' and the terms of Crown Castle Purchase Order Number 458910, in accordance with application 145544, revision 2. The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the tower stress level. Based on our analysis we have determined the tower stress level for the structure and foundation, under the following load case, to be: LCT Existing + Reserved + Proposed Equipment Sufficient Capacity Note:See Table I and Table 11 for the proposed and existing/reserved loading, respectively. The analysis has been performed in accordance with the TIA-222-G standard and all local code requirements based upon a wind speed of 120 mph 3-second gust, exposure category C with topographic category 1 and crest height of 0 feet. We at GPD Group appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and Crown Castle. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please give us a call. Respectfully submitted by: Z)F:A; ® NfF H4W41NINU•ff IS /w 110b 710N OF LAW FUR AM, Icy• PERSON TO AI.YFP THl° CDCUIYENf UNLESS HE IS a ACTINO UNDcN THi i'HE MON OF A I LICENSED avid . Granger, P.E ' PROFESSIQNAiLNF _ New York* 071387-1 �FESSlO��� 520 South Main Street Suite 2531 .Akron,Ohio 44311 .330-572-2100.Fax 330-572-2101 .www.GPDGroup.00m Glaus Pyle Schomer Burns and DeHaven,Inc.Akron.Atlanta.Cleveland.Columbus.Indianapolis.Louisville.Marion.Phoenix.Seattle.Youngstown • • Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) INTRODUCTION 2)ANALYSIS CRITERIA Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Table 2- Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information Table 3- Design Antenna and Cable Information 3)ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 4- Documents Provided 3.1)Analysis Method 3.2)Assumptions 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 5- Section Capacity(Summary) Table 6—Tower Components vs. Capacity 4.1) Recommendations 5) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES 6)APPENDIX A tnxTower Output 7)APPENDIX B Base Level Drawing 8) APPENDIX C Additional Calculations tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 3 1) INTRODUCTION The existing monopole has 12 sides and is evenly tapered from 36" (flat-flat) at the base to 14.5" (flat-flat) at the top. It has three major sections, connected with slip joints. The tower is painted white and has no tower lighting. This tower is a 108.5 ft Monopole tower designed by EEI in August of 1991. The tower was originally designed for a wind speed of 80 mph per EIA-222-D. Modifications designed by PJF (Job#: 41704-152, dated 11/30/05) have been installed and were considered in the analysis. They consisted of installing modification plates to the pole shaft and adding anchor rods to the base plate. Modifications designed by GPD (Project #: 2010111.14 Rev. C, dated 8/18/10) have also been installed and were considered in this analysis. They consist of installing modification channels to the pole shaft, removing existing flat plate reinforcement on the pole, installing additional anchor rods to the base plate, and installing a concrete collar to the tower base foundation. The proposed 12' tower extension called out in these drawings was not installed was therefore not considered. The modifications designed by GPD (Project #: 2011111.18, dated 3/30/11) which consist of adding an 8.5' extension to the top of the tower were considered in this analysis. 2)ANALYSIS CRITERIA The structural analysis was performed for this tower in accordance with the requirements of TIA-222-G Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures using a 3-second gust wind speed of 120 mph with no ice, 50 mph with 0.75 inch ice thickness and 60 mph under service loads, exposure category C with topographic category 1 and crest height of 0 feet. Table 1 -Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna Level(ft) Elevation °f Manufacturer Antenna Model of Feed Line Note (ft) Antennas Lines Size(in) 3 Antel BXA-171090/8CF 100 104 6 Antel BXA-70090/4CF 6 RFS/Celwave FD9R6004 tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 4 Table 2-Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna of Antenna Model of Feed Line Note Level(ft) Elevation [Antennas Manufacturer (ft) Lines Size(in) 110 6 Kathreln 80010504 108 12 1-5/8 1 108 1 T-Arm Mount[TA 702-3] 1 3/8 3 Antel ADA-63406380CF 100 104 6 Antel ADA-85408580CF 2 100 1 Platform Mount[LP 602-1] 1 3/8 1 Comsat RSI A-18A24N-U 12 7/8 1 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] 3 Andrew E15S08P80 90 90 3 Andrew E15S09P94 24 7/8 6 Andrew TMBXX-6516-R2M 6 EMS Wireless RR65-19-02DP 82 12 Decibel DB845N65ZAXT 80 _.. — 801 Platform Mount[LP 305-1]' 12 7/8 1 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] 3 Allgon 7250.02 3 Kathrein 80010121 70 70 -- - 12 7/8 3 Powerwave 7770.00 3 Powerwave LGP17265 6 Powerwave TTAW-0000112 001 1 Pipe Mount[PM 601-1] -_-_-- — 30 30 1 Maxrad GPS-TMG-26NMS 1 1/2 1 Notes: 1) Reserved equipment. 2) The existing equipment shall be removed prior to the installation of the proposed loading and was not considered in the analysis. Table 3 - Design Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna of Antenna Model of Feed Line Level(ft) Elevation Manufacturer (ft) [Antennas Lines Size(in) 12 ALP 9212 100 100 1 AMPS type platform 3 DB560 80 80 2 8'Standard Dishes tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 5 3)ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 4-Documents Provided Document Remarks Reference Source EEI Job#: CSONY257, dated Original Tower Drawings 8/21/91 Doc ID#: 642734 Crown DMZ Foundation Drawings Edwards& Kelcey, Inc. Dwg#: 92-8012, dated 7/31/91 Doc ID#: 260900 Crown DMZ Geotechnical Report FDH Project#: 04-1016E, dated Doc ID#: 949960 Crown DMZ 10/12/04 Modification Drawings PJF Job#: 41704-152, dated Doc ID#: 2412725 Crown DMZ 11/30105 Modification Drawings GPD Project#: 2010111.14 Rev. Doc ID#: 2619474 Crown DMZ C, dated 8/18/10 Modification Drawings GPD Project#: 2011111.18, dated Doc ID M 2861710 Crown DMZ 3/30/11 Post Modification Inspection !GPD Project#: 2010111.68, dated; Doc ID#: 2710931 ! Crown DMZ 3/30/11 Previous Structural Analysis GPD Project#: 2011178.90, dated Doc ID#: 2877581 Crown DMZ 4/29/11 3.1) Analysis Method tnxTower(version 6.0.4.0), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases. Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A. 3.2) Assumptions 1) Tower and structures were built in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 2) The tower and structures have been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specification. 3) The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as specified in Tables 1 and 2 and the referenced drawings. 4) When applicable, transmission cables are considered as structural components for calculating wind loads as allowed by TIA-222-G. 5) Mount sizes, weights, and manufacturers are best estimates based on photos provided and determined without the benefit of a site visit by GPD. 6) All member connections and foundation steel reinforcing are assumed designed to meet or exceed the load carrying capacity of the connected member and surrounding soils respectively unless otherwise specified in this report. 7) All equipment model numbers, quantities, and centerline elevations are as provided in the CCI CAD package dated 4/10/12 with any adjustments as noted below. This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. GPD Group should be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the tower. 4)ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 5-Section Capacity (Summary) S cttiion Elevation(k) Component Size Element P(K)crical SF•P allow % Pass/Fail (K) capacity Ll 108.5-100.5 Pole TP12x124.375 1 -0.80 431.40 ` 19.3 Pass tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 6 Section Component Critical F"P_allow %No. Elevation(ft) Type Size Element P(K): (K) Capacity Pass I Fail L2 ( 100.5-100 Pole i TP14.5xl2x0.375 2 -0.80 431.40 19.3 Pass L3 100-82.083 Pole TP18.569lxl4.5x0.1875 3 -4.68 785.97 i.. 91 9 Pass L4 72083- 1 0 2338 Pole+Reinf. i TP21.2603xl 8.5691 x0.7269 4 8.58 3418.84 51.9 Pass --_- 70.2338 L5 60.1667 Pole+Reinf. (TP22.7702xl 9.0894x0.7502 5 -14.62 3920.82 72.3 Pass I � L6 60.1667 33.7477 i pole+Reinf. TP29.0368x22.7702x0.8909 6 2246 5744.37 76.3 Pass : ....33.7477 L7 30.5 Pole+Reinf. TP29.029lx26.2755x0.9002 7 -25.33 575099 77.1 Pass L8 -16.2083 Pole+Reinf. TP32.2955x29.0291 x0.8978 8 -32.82 6690.52 85.4 '.. Pass L9 16.2083- Pole+Reinf. TP33.0383x32.2955x0.9036 9 -34.31 6891.80 1 86.8 Pass L10 12.9683-9 Pole+Reinf. TP33.943x33.0383x0.9784 10 3628 7655.02 814 Pass L11 9-0 Pole+Reinf. TP36x33.943x0.7501 1139.8 67 275.66 104.5 Pass (Summary,: -1-,---------- - _.___._ -_ _.-. _ Pole(L3) !. 104.5 Pass Rating- 104.5 !. Pass Table 6-Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity -LC1 Notes Component Elevation (ft) % Capacity Pass/Fail 1 Anchor Rods 0 68.5 Pass 1 Base Plate 0 81.3 Pass Base Foundation 1 Soil Interaction 0 48.0 Pass Structure Rating(max from all components)= 104.5% Notes: 1) See additional documentation in"Appendix C-Additional Calculations"for calculations supporting the%capacity consumed. 2) Capacities up to 105%are considered acceptable based on analysis methods used. 4.1) Recommendations We recommend installing additional reinforcing to the monopole shaft. All modifications would need to be engineered and are beyond the scope of this report. tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 7 5) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES GPD GROUP has not performed a site visit to the tower to verify the member sizes or antenna/coax loading. If the existing conditions are not as represented on the tower elevation contained in this report, we should be contacted immediately to evaluate the significance of the discrepancy. This is not a condition assessment of the tower or foundation. This report does not replace a full tower inspection. The tower and foundations are assumed to have been properly fabricated, erected, maintained, in good condition,twist free, and plumb. The engineering services rendered by GPD GROUP in connection with this Structural Analysis are limited to a computer analysis of the tower structure and theoretical capacity of its main structural members. All tower components have been assumed to only resist dead loads when no other loads are applied. No allowance was made for any damaged, bent, missing, loose, or rusted members (above and below ground). No allowance was made for loose bolts or cracked welds. GPD GROUP does not analyze the fabrication of the structure (including welding). It is not possible to have all the very detailed information needed to perform a thorough analysis of every structural sub-component and connection of an existing tower. GPD GROUP provides a limited scope of service in that we cannot verify the adequacy of every weld, plate connection detail, etc. The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility of adding appurtenances usually accompanied by transmission lines to the structure. It is the owner's responsibility to determine the amount of ice accumulation in excess of the code specified amount, if any, that should be considered in the structural analysis. The attached sketches are a schematic representation of the analyzed tower. If any material is fabricated from these sketches, the contractor shall be responsible for field verifying the existing conditions, proper fit, and clearance in the field. Any mentions of structural modifications are reasonable estimates and should not be used as a precise construction document. Precise modification drawings are obtainable from GPD GROUP, but are beyond the scope of this report. Miscellaneous items such as antenna mounts, etc., have not been designed or detailed as a part of our work. We recommend that material of adequate size and strength be purchased from a reputable tower manufacturer. GPD GROUP makes no warranties, expressed and/or implied, in connection with this report and disclaims any liability arising from material, fabrication, and erection of this tower. GPD GROUP will not be responsible whatsoever for, or on account of, consequential or incidental damages sustained by any person, firm, or organization as a result of any data or conclusions contained in this report. The maximum liability of GPD GROUP pursuant to this report will be limited to the total fee received for preparation of this report. tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 8 APPENDIX A TNXTOWER OUTPUT tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 _ 11150 85fl DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING o TYPE _ ELEVATION TYPE _ ELEVATON w o T Arm Mount ITA 702-3] 108 E15S08P00 90 s001050aw/M/Mouton, 108 E15SOBP80 90 �_i 1035fi 8W 10501wRA un piw 100 E15609P94 90 li (2)00010504 RAount Pira 108 �E1$S09P84 90 oi to j (2)8X01 ON wNnunt Pipa 10 E15509P94 190 Ratform Mount ILP 60211 im I Ralfmm Mount[LP 3051) 80 '... �Y x4Mount Pipe 100 (4)1)13B45N657AXT w/Mount Pue X80 ❑❑❑ 2 d Mount Pipe 1X0 (4)DB845NO5 r wManind P pa 80 m 2 6 Mowl P p 100 (q DBB45N6524%T awfalourat Puna 80 C o m +H1 A1BA24N-U WO T-Am Mount JA 00231 70 (2)BXA 7009(/4CF /60 M unt PN 100 M10121 /Mount Pipe 70 (2)BXA70000/4CFw/6o Mount Ppe tPo 80010121w/MourdRto 70 '. (2)BXM70000/4CF w/60'Mount P pe tPo 80010121 wl Mount Rpe ]0 '. Bx 1710NMCF RA ntPpe 100 7770 00 w/M nlPne _..__ ]0 l' 821 It BXAt]t090tBCF RAount Pi/a 10( yT/OOII wIMo nlPpe 70 BXX1710902CF 1Mount Pue X100 7T701)(tw/MOunl Ppe 170 (2)FDW6004 100 L725002w/Mount Rpe �70 - (2)FDWMX4 I'10 — 1725002 w/Mount Rue ____... j]0 _ ((2)FDWGW4 -1 C0 7250 02 w/Mount Rpe 70 m ry TAnn Mount RA 602-31 � 90 LCit]205 70 - ry - (2)TM8X%E516-1k2M w/Mount Ppe 90 LW17205 - 70 ' 0 j I (2)TMBX -0518R2MvalMO tP _ L(+P17206 70 i 702fl (2)1MBX%L516R2M /Mount PIM pe M)90 (2)TTAW-0000112001 70 A ... .. (2)RRBS18-03DP /MountRpe 90 (2)TTAW-OW3112Wt ]0 _(2)RRBsl M21DID /mountp=yea _90 (2)TTAW-0".000112-Nj 70(2)RROS19-02DP w)mourn pipe N Rpe Mowt IPM 601-t) 30 , n ry c E15508P80 00 -GPSlA1G26NMS JO ry _ MATERIAL STRENGTH 601 It GRADE Fy Fu GRADE I Fy Fu —I 1 LAS3B635 35 kti 63 ks1 A572.65 65 k9 80 ksi O TOWER DESIGN NOTES 4. Tower is located in Suffolk County,New York. 2. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard. 3. Tower designed for a 120 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard. 1 4. Tower is also designed for a 50 mph basic wind with 0.75 in ice.Ice is considered to increase in thickness with height. 5. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind. 6. Tower Structure Class It 7. Topographic Category 1 with Crest Height of 0.00 It 337It 30.5It ALL REACTIONS 1 1.. AREFACTORED n AXIAL 68 K 162n SHEAR MOMENT 7K 543 klp-ft ry m n 2 M 130fl_ TORQUE 0 kip-@ 50 mph WIND-0.7500 in ICE sun_ AXIAL 40K SHEA MOMENT w C m n 46 K 3282 kip-ft O.Ofl TORQUE 1 kip-ft m _ REACTIONS-120 mph WIND cE to to Q CPD Group Job 'NY Cutchogue,BU#:806579 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 P101ad.2012775.806579.01 GPD GRC)UP Akron, OH 44311 client:Crown Cases Drawn 1,tbowma App B' consulting Engineers Phone:(330)572-2100 "' TIA-222-G Odle 04/19/12 S.I.: NTS FAX 330 572-2101 Porn'o Vo1S2o1277saoA 901an d 79.,, Dwg Na.E-1 Feedline Distribution Chart • 01 -108,61, nomM Flat App In Face App Out Face Tm55 Ley 108.50 Face A FaceB Face C 106.50 10800 _.._—__ 106.00 iW 501 10000 _. _.. - 1W.W 100.6➢ '... Woo sem '.. ._8550 05.50 0208 0150 ` 81.W ` 8200 t 8000 to fiom N I 755075M g as as 7225 _ 7225_ti 7023 7000 m 7000a �� 7023 66 zs _ s _ 66.25 g g 3 is m L. u m O Q tt ¢ ¢ 6017,, mO m_... _ — _ _ _._. _ m n „ m bo a1' m m m r o a o S o o is o r E i W _ o a 33.75.. 44 3375J 3050'.. 3050 0050 v '30.50 E LL U > ¢ K m m 1621' y c o c or ___. _. .__.� ` 18.21 c c c 1296 U v Is v ... _ ' E _ .12.96 m m o a o a n 9 8.00 .00 900 em on 050 050. 000 ,.. .. GPD Group Job-NY Cutchogue,BU#:806579 fWj, 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 Protect'2012775.806579.01 GPD GRCH!P Akron,OH 44311cI'Km:Craun Cas � tl Drawnny:tbowma Appd. eeeamengineers Phone:(330)572-2100 eine: =n _ Date:04/19/12 scam: NTS FAX: 330 572-2101 nam'mmlewnnseafis]9m1wae0�)9m Owq mo.E-7 0 - ower Job Page tnxTT j NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 1 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Tower Input Data There is a pole section. This tower is designed using the TIA-222-G standard. The following design criteria apply: Tower is located in Suffolk County,New York. Basic wind speed of 120 mph. Structure Class II. Exposure Category C. Topographic Category 1. Crest Height 0.00 ft. Nominal ice thickness of 0.7500 in. Ice thickness is considered to increase with height. Ice density of 56 pcf. A wind speed of 50 mph is used in combination with ice. Temperature drop of 50 °P. Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph. A non-linear(P-delta)analysis was used. Pressures are calculated at each section. Stress ratio used in pole design is 1. Local bending stresses due to climbing loads,feedline supports,and appurtenance mounts are not considered. Options Consider Moments-Legs Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder Consider Moments-Horizontals Assume Legs Pinned Use ASCE 10 X-Brace Ly Rules Consider Moments-Diagonals q Assume Rigid Index Plate Calculate Redundant Bracing Forces Use Moment Magnification Use Clear Spans For Wind Area Ignore Redundant Members in FEA d Use Code Stress Ratios Use Clear Spans For KUr SR Leg Bolts Resist Compression V Use Code Safety Factors-Guys Retension Guys To Initial Tension All Leg Panels Have Same Allowable Escalate Ice N Bypass Mast Stability Checks Offset Girt At Foundation Always Use Max Kz Use Azimuth Dish Coefficients d Consider Feedline Torque Use Special Wind Profile d Project Wind Area of Appurt. J Include Angle Block Shear Check Include Bolts In Member Capacity Autocalc Torque Arm Areas Poles Leg Bolts Are At Top Of Section SR Members Have Cut Ends Include Shear-Torsion Interaction N Secondary Horizontal Braces Leg Sort Capacity Reports By Component Always Use Sub-Critical Flow Use Diamond Inner Bracing(4 Sided) d Triangulate Diamond Inner Bracing Use Top Mounted Sockets Add IBC.6D+W Combination Tapered Pole Section Geometry Section Elevation Section Splice Number TOP Bottom Wall Bend Pole Grade Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius ft ft ft Sides in in in in LI 108.50-100.50 8.00 0.00 Round 12.0000 12.0000 0.3750 A53-B-35 (35 ksi) L2 100.50-100.00 0.50 0.00 Round 12.0000 14.5000 0.3750 A53-B-35 (35 ksi) L3 10000-8208 17.92 000 12 14.5000 18.5691 0.1875 0.7500 A572-65 (65 ksi) LA 82.08-70.23 11.85 3.16 12 18.5691 212603 0.7269 2.9076 A572-65 (65 ksi) L5 70.23-60.17 13.22 0.00 12 19.0894 22.7702 0.7502 3.0008 A572-65 (65 ksi) tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page2 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)571-2101 Section Elevation Section Splice Number TOP Bottom Wall Bend Pole Grade Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius ft A ft Sides in in in in L6 60.17-33,75 26,42 413 12 227702 29.0368 0.8909 3.5636 A572-65 (65 ksi) L7 33.75-30.50 7.38 000 12 26.2755 29.0291 0.9002 3.6008 A572-65 (65 ksi) L8 30.50-1621 14.29 0.00 12 29.0291 32.2955 0.8978 3.5912 A572-65 (65 ksi) L9 16.21-12.96 3,25 0.00 12 32.2955 33.0383 0.9036 3.6144 A572-65 (65 ksi) LIO 12.96-9.00 3.96 0.00 12 33.0383 33.9430 0.9784 3.9136 A572-65 (65 ksi) Lll 9.00-0.00 900 12 33.9430 360000 0.7501 3.0004 A572-65 (65 ksi) Tapered Pole Properties Section Tip Dia. Area I r C I/C J It/Q w wa in int in' in in in in' in' in LI 12.0000 13.6954 231.5276 4.1152 6.0000 38.5879 4624244 6.8436 0.0000 0 12.0000 13.6954 231.5276 4.1152 6-0000 38.5879 4624244 6.8436 0.0000 0 L2 12.0000 13.6954 231.5276 4.1152 60000 38.5879 462.4244 6.8436 00000 0 14.5000 16.6406 415.3261 50003 72500 57.2864 829.5207 8.3153 0.0000 0 L3 15.0115 86412 2259382 5-1239 7.5110 30.0810 457.8120 42529 3.3835 18.045 192241 110979 478.6224 6.5806 9.6188 49,7591 969.8188 5.4620 4.4740 23.861 L4 192241 417618 1696.9213 6.3875 9.6188 176,4173 3438.4226 20-5539 3.0284 4166 22.0103 48.0608 25864203 73510 11.0128 234.8551 5240.7887 236541 3.7497 5.158 L5 206726 44.3009 1901.7684 6.5654 98883 192.3253 3853.4984 21.8036 3-1054 4.139 23.5734 53.1925 3292.0834 7.8832 117950 279.1092 6670.6534 26.1797 40919 5.454 L6 23.5734 62.7651 3835.0502 T8328 11.7950 325.1430 7770.8514 30.8911 3.7148 4.17 30.0611 807421 8164 2482 100762 150411 5427973 16542.9804 39.7388 5.3943 6.055 L7 287981 73.5538 6045.2210 9.0843 136107 444.1525 12249.2566 36.2010 4.6293 5.143 300531 815357 8234.5350 10.0701 150371 547.6155 16685 4003 40.1294 5.3673 5.962 L8 30.0531 81.3252 8214.6834 10.0710 15-0371 546.2953 16645.1757 40.0258 5.3737 5.985 33,4349 90.7681 11421 2840 11.2404 167291 682.7208 23142.6178 446733 6.2491 696 L9 334348 91.3376 11488.6990 11.2383 16.7291 686.7506 23279.2189 44.9536 62335 6.899 34.2038 93.4989 123236908 11.5042 17.1138 720.1009 24971.1387 46.0173 64326 7.119 LIO 34.2038 101.0030 132508811 114774 17.1138 770.2787 26849.8775 49.7106 62322 6.37 35.1404 103.8533 14404.6164 11.8013 17.5825 8192599 291826581 51.1134 6.4746 6.618 Lll 35.1404 80.1715 11274.4815 11.8831 17.5825 641.2341 22845.1563 394580 7.0865 9447 372699 85-1399 13503.1364 12.6195 186480 724.1064 273610153 41.9032 7.6377 10.182 Tower Gusset Gusset Gusset Grade Adjust.Factor Adjust. Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle Elevation Area Thickness Af Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt (Perforce) A, Spacing Spacing Diagonals HOrc:omals ft f in in in LI 108.50-100.50 L2 100.50-100.00 L3 100.00-82.08 L4 82.08-70 23 I 1 1 L5 70.23-60.17 I I I L6 60 17-33.75 I 1 1 L7 33.75-30.50 I 1 1 L8 30.50-16.21 1 1 I L91621-12.96 1 I 1 L 10 12 96-9.00 1 1 1 tnxToweY Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page3 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-210/ Tower Gusset Gusset Gusset Grade Adjust.Factor Adjust. Weight Unit Double Angle Double Angle Elevation Area Thickness A, Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt (perface) A, Spacing Spacing Diagonals Horizontals ft (ts in in in L 11 9-00-0.00 1 1 1 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Round Or Flat Description Sector Component Placement Total Number StarNEnd Width or Perimeter Weight Type Number Per Row Position Diameter ft in in k!f LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) A Surface At 10800-800 12 6 0,000 1 9800 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) A Surface At 108.00-8.00 1 1 0.000 0.0000 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 LDF4P-50A(1/2 FOAM) A Surface At 30,00-8.00 1 1 0.000 0.0000 0.00 (CaAa) 0-000 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev G) A Surface At 30,50-0 50 1 1 0.000 7.9300 24.9100 0.00 (CaAa) 0000 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev G) B Surface Af 30.50-0.50 1 1 0.000 29300 24.9100 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev G) C Surface Af 30.50-0,50 1 1 0.000 7.9300 24.9100 0.00 (CaAa) 0-000 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev G) A Surface Af 85.50-3050 1 1 0.000 6.8900 219900 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev G) B Surface At 95.50-3050 1 1 0.000 6.8900 21 9900 0.00 (CaAa) 0 000 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev G) C Surface Af 85.50-30.50 1 1 0 000 6.8900 21.9900 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 Bridge Stiffeners B Surface Af 72.25-66.25 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05 (CaAa) 0.000 Bridge Stiffeners B Surface Af 81.50-75.50 1 1 0000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05 (CaAa) 0000 Bridge Stiffeners C Surface Af 7225-66,25 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05 (CaAa) 0.000 Bridge Stiffeners C Surface Af 81.50-75.50 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 005 (CaAa) 0-000 Step Pegs C Surface At 10850-8.00 1 1 0.000 00000 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 Safety Line 3/8 C Surface At 10850-8,00 1 1 0 000 00000 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CA,, Weight or Shield Type Number Leg jt fFl t klf LDF5-50A(7/8 FOAM) A No Inside Pole 100.00-8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.00 0.00 V Ice 000 000 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) A No Inside Pole 100.00-8.00 1 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.00 0.00 1"Ice 0.00 0.00 LDF5-50A(7/8 FOAM) B No Inside Pole 9000-800 24 No Ice 0.00 000 1/2"Ice 0.00 000 I"Ice 0.00 0.00 LDF5-50A(7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 80.00-8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2"lee 0.00 0.00 1"Ice 0.00 0.00 tnx ower Job Page i NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 4 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 25.31 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Deslgned by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX (330)572-2101 tbowman Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CAA Weight or Shield Type Number Leg fr ftt/ft klf LDF5-50A(7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 70.00-8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.00 0.00 V Ice 0.00 0.00 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas Tower Tower Face Are AF CA, Cot Weight Section Elevation In Face Out Face ft ft' fit ft' ftz K Ll 108.50-100.50 A 0.000 0.000 8.910 0.000 007 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0 000 0.000 0.02 L2 100.50-100.00 A 0.000 0000 0.594 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0 000 0.000 0.00 L3 100 00-82.08 A 0.000 0.000 25.209 0.000 025 B 0.000 0.000 3.924 0 000 0.06 C 0.000 0.000 3.924 0.000 0.05 L4 82.08-7023 A 0.000 0.000 27.684 0.000 0.17 B 0.000 0.000 18.704 0 000 049 C 0.000 0.000 18.704 0.000 0.47 L5 70.23-60.17 A 0.000 0.000 23.520 0.000 0.14 B 0.000 0 000 14.093 0.000 028 C 0.000 0.000 14 093 0.000 031 L6 60.17-33.75 A 0.000 0.000 61.724 0.000 0.37 B 0.000 0.000 30338 0.000 021 C 0000 0.000 30.338 0000 0.29 L7 33.75-30.50 A 0.000 0.000 7.588 0.000 0.05 B 0 000 0.000 3.729 0 000 0.03 C 0.000 0.000 3 729 0.000 0.04 L8 3050-1621 A 0 000 0.000 35.867 0,000 0.20 B 0.000 0.000 18.889 0.000 0.11 C 0.000 0.000 18.889 0.000 0.16 L9 16.21-12.96 A 0000 0.000 8.156 0000 0.05 B 0.000 0.000 4 295 0.000 0.03 C 0.000 0.000 4 295 0.000 0.04 LIO 12.96-9.00 A 0.000 0.000 9.934 0.000 0.06 B 0.000 0.000 5 232 0.000 003 C 0.000 0.000 5 232 0.000 0.04 LII 9,00-000 A 0.000 0.000 12.422 0 000 0.01 B 0.000 0 000 11.234 0 000 0.01 C 0.000 0.000 11 234 0.000 001 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas - With Ice Tower Tower Face Ice As Ar CgA,A CA,, Weight Section Elevation or Thickness In Face Out Face it Leg in ft' fr' ft' ( K LI 108.50-100.50 A 1683 0.000 0.000 16.819 0.000 0.31 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 5.386 0.000 0.08 L2 100.50-100 00 A 1.676 0.000 0.000 L 120 0.000 0.02 B 0.000 0 000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.335 0.000 000 L3 100.00-82.08 A 1.660 0.000 0.000 45.045 0.000 0.87 B 0.000 0 000 5.058 0.000 0.13 C 0.000 0.000 16.952 0.000 0.24 Job Page MxTower NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 5 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main Sc;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2/00 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbOWfila6 Tower Tower Face Ice As AF C'0" Cyl,i Weight Section Elevation or Thickness In Face Out Face ft Leg in ft= f 7t2 ft, K 1.4 82,08-7023 A 1.631 0.000 0 000 43.761 0.000 0.74 B 0.000 0.000 23.362 0.000 0.88 C 0.000 0.000 31.090 0.000 0.93 L5 70.23-60.17 A 1.605 0000 0.000 37.180 0.000 0.63 B 0.000 0.000 17.776 0.000 0.54 C 0.000 0.000 24.342 0.000 0.64 L6 60.17-33.75 A 1.552 0.000 0.000 96.223 0.000 1.58 B 0.000 0.000 38539 0.000 0.65 C 0.000 0.000 54.940 0.000 0.89 L7 33.75-30.50 A 1.496 0.000 0.000 11.829 0.000 0.19 B 0.000 0.000 4 738 0.000 0.08 C 0.000 0.000 6.754 0.000 0.11 L8 30.50-16.21 A 1448 0.000 0.000 57.560 0.000 0.87 B 0.000 0.000 23 028 0.000 0.36 C 0.000 0.000 31308 0,000 0,47 L9 16.21-12.96 A 1.382 0.000 0.000 12.940 0.000 0.19 B 0.000 0 000 5.194 0 000 008 C 0 000 0.000 6.991 0.000 0.10 1,10 12.96-9.00 A 1.344 0.000 0 000 15 630 0.000 023 B 0.000 0.000 6.295 0.000 0.09 C 0.000 0.000 8,423 0.000 0.12 LII 9.00-0.00 A 1.228 0.000 0.000 15.605 0.000 0.16 B 0.000 0.000 13.321 0.000 0.13 C 0.000 0.000 13.813 0.000 0.13 Feed Line Center of Pressure Section Elevation CP. CP, CP.' CP, Ice Ice ft in in in in Ll 108.50-100.50 -0.9246 -0.5338 -0.7571 -0.2214 L2 10050-100.00 -0.9796 -0.5656 -0.8225 -0.2510 L3 100 00-82.08 -0.8155 -0,4708 -0.7958 -0,2348 L4 82.08-70.23 -02378 -0.1373 -0.3697 40650 L5 70,23-60 17 -0.3522 -0.2033 -0.4727 -0.1093 L6 60.17-33.75 -0.5639 -0.3256 -0.6767 -0.1957 L7 3375-30.50 -05923 -0.3420 -0.7193 -0.2057 LS 3050-16.21 -0.5751 -0.3320 -0.7826 -0.2558 L9 16.21-12.96 -0.5950 -0.3435 -0.8145 -0.2717 L10 12.96-9.00 -0.6029 -0.3481 -0.8254 -02786 LII 9.00-0.00 -0.0793 40458 -0.1277 -0.0448 Shielding Factor Ka Tower Feed Line Description Feed Line K. Ko Section Record No. Segment Elev. No Ice Ice Ll 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 100.50- 1,0000 1.0000 108.00 LI 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 10050- 1.0000 1.0000 10800 Ll 26 Step Pegs 100.50- 1.0000 1,0000 108.50 LI 27 Safety Line 3/8 100.50- 1.0000 1.0000 108.50 L2 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 10000- 1.0000 1.0000 100.50 2-SOA 1 7 LDF (3/8 FOAM) 100,00- 1.0 000 1 0000 tnxTower Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 6 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH 44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX (330)572-2101 tbowman Tower Feed Line Description Feed Line Ko Ko Section Record No. Se meat Elev. No Ice Ice 100.50 L2 26 Step Pegs 100,00- 1.0000 10000 100.50 L2 27 Safety Line 3/8 100,00- 1.0000 1.0000 100.50 L3 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 82.08-100,00 10000 1.0000 L3 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 82.08-100 00 10000 1.0000 L3 19 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 8208-8550 10000 1.0000 G) L3 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 82.08-85.50 1.0000 10000 G) L3 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 82.08-85.50 1.0000 1.0000 G) L3 26 Step Pegs 8208-100.00 1.0000 1.0000 L3 27 Safety Line 3/8 82.08-10000 10000 10000 L4 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 70.23-82 08 10000 1.0000 L4 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 70,23-8208 1.0000 10000 L4 19 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 70.23-82.08 1.0000 1.0000 G) L4 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 70.23-82.08 1.0000 1.0000 G) L4 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 70.23-82 08 10000 1.0000 G) L4 22 Bridge Stiffeners 70.23-72.25 1.0000 10000 L4 23 Bridge Stiffeners 75,50-81 50 10000 10000 L4 24 Bridge Stiffeners 70,23-7225 10000 1.0000 L4 25 Bridge Stiffeners 75,50-81 50 10000 1.0000 L4 26 Step Pegs 7023-8208 1.0000 1.0000 L4 27 Safety Line 3/8 70.23-82.08 1.0000 1.0000 L6 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 33.75-60.17 10000 1.0000 L6 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 3375-60.17 1.0000 1.0000 L6 19 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 33.75-60.17 1.0000 1.0000 G) L6 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 33.75-60.17 10000 10000 G) L6 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 33.75-60.17 10000 10000 G) L6 26 Step Pegs 3375-60 17 1.0000 1.0000 L6 27 Safety Line 3/8 3375-6017 1.0000 1.0000 L8 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 1621 -3050 1.0000 1.0000 L8 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 1621-3050 1.0000 1.0000 L8 8 LDF4P-50A(I2 FOAM) 16.21 -30.00 1.0000 1.0000 L8 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 16.21-30.50 1.0000 1 0000 G) L8 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 1621-30,50 1.0000 1.0000 G) L8 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 16.21-3050 10000 1.0000 G) L8 26 Step Pegs 1621-30,50 1.0000 1.0000 L8 27 Safety Line 3/8 16.21-3050 1.0000 1.0000 L9 6 LDF7-50A(I-5/8 FOAM) 12.96-16.21 1.0000 1.0000 L9 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 12.96-16.21 10000 1.0000 L9 8 LDF4P-50A(12 FOAM) 12.96-1621 1.0000 1.0000 L9 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 12.96-16.21 10000 1.0000 G) L9 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 12.96-1621 1.0000 1.0000 G) L9 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 12.96-16.21 1.0000 L0000 G) L9 26 Step Pegs 12.96-16.21 1.0000 1.0000 L9 27 Safery Line 3/8 12.96-16.21 1.0000 1 0000 LIO 6 LDF7-50A(I-5/B FOAM) 9.00- 12.96 1.0000 L0000 Job Page to xTower NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 7 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbOWman Traver Feed Line Description Feed Line K. & Section Record No. Segment Elee No ke Ice L I O 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 9.00-12 96 1.0000 1.0000 L10 8 LDF4P-50A(1R FOAM) 9.00- 12.96 1.0000 1,0000 L10 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 9.00-12.96 10000 1.0000 G) L10 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 900- 1296 1.0000 1.0000 G) LI O 18 MP3-08 Mad Channel(Rev 9.00-12.96 1.0000 1.0000 G) LIO 26 Step Pegs 900- 12.96 1.0000 10000 LI O 27 Safety Line 3/8 9,00- 12.96 1.0000 10000 LII 6 LDF7-50A(I-5/8 FOAM) 8.00-900 1.0000 1.0000 L11 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 8,00-9.00 10000 1.0000 LII 8 LDF4P-50A(1/2 FOAM) 8,00-9.00 1.0000 10000 LII 16 MP3-09 Mod Channel(Rev 050-9.00 10000 1.0000 G) LII 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 050-900 1,0000 1.0000 G) LII 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 050-900 1.0000 1.0000 G) Ll l 26 Step Pegs 8.00-9.00 1 0000 1.0000 LII 27 Safe Line 3/8 8.00-9.00 1 0000 1.0000 Discrete Tower Loads Description Face Offset Offsets. A_imuth Placement C,{A,, CA,, Weight or Type Hor_ Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Vert ft ft fr2 f K ft It T-Arm Mount[TA 702-31 C None 0.0000 108.00 No Ice 5.64 5.64 0.34 1/2"Ice 6.55 6.55 0.43 1"Ice 7.46 7.46 052 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 346 30.0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 3.53 0.04 2.00 1/2"Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08 2.00 1"Ice 5.06 5.36 012 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.46 40.0000 10800 No Ice 394 3.53 0.04 2.00 1/2"Ice 4.55 4.59 008 2.00 I"Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12 (2)800 10504 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 3.94 10.0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 3.53 0.04 069 1/2"Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08 2.00 1"Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12 (2)800 10504 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 394 10.0000 108-00 No Ice 3.94 3 53 0.04 0.69 1/2"Ice 4.55 4.59 008 200 1"Ice 5.06 5.36 0 1 Platform Mount[LP 602-1] C None 0.0000 100.00 No Ice 32.03 3203. 1.34 In"Ice 38.71 38.71 1.80 1"Ice 45.39 45.39 2.26 2"x 4'Mount Pipe A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 0.79 0.79 0.02 Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 1 03 1.03 0.03 g 0.00 1"Ice 1.28 1.28 004 2"x 4'Mount Pipe B From 3.80 -18.0000 10000 No Ice 079 079 0.02 Centroid-Le -124 1/2"Ice 1.03 1.03 003 g 0.00 1"Ice 1.28 1.28 004 2"x 4'Mount Pipe C From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 0.79 0.79 002 Centroid-Le -1.24 I/2"Ice 103 1.03 0.03 g 0.00 1"Ice 1.28 1.28 0.04 A-18A24N-U C From 3.80 0.0000 100.00 No Ice 6.32 6.32 0.01 Centroid-Le -124 1/2"Ice 6.83 6.83 0.04 slax l Qwer Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 8 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH 443/1 Client Designed by Phone:(330)571-2/00 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CA, C4AA Weight or Type Hoc Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Vert ft ° ft ft' ft, K ft ll g 000 1"Ice 7.34 7.34 0.07 (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/60' A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 4.01 4.04 0.04 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 4.44 465 0.08 g 4.00 1"Ice 4.88 5.28 0.13 (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/60" B From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 4.01 4.04 0.04 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 444 4.65 0.08 g 4.00 1"Ice 4.88 5.28 0.13 (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/60" C From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 4.01 4.04 0.04 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2"Ice 4.44 465 0.08 g 4.00 1"Ice 4.88 5.28 0.13 BXA-171090/BCF w/Mount A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 3.63 3.80 0.04 Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 425 4.83 007 g 4.00 1"Ice 478 5.57 0.12 BXA-I 7109018CF w/Mount B From 3.80 -18.0000 10000 No Ice 3.63 3.80 0.04 Pipe Centroid-Le -1 24 1/2"Ice 4.25 4.83 0.07 g 4.00 1"Ice 4.78 5.57 0.12 BXA-I 71090/8CF w/Mount C From 3.80 -180000 100.00 No Ice 3.63 3.80 004 Pipe Centroid-Le -L24 1/2"Ice 4.25 4.83 0.07 g 4.00 1"Ice 4.78 5.57 0.12 (2)FD9R6004 A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 0.37 025 0.00 Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 045 0.32 001 g 400 1"Ice 0.54 0,40 0.01 (2)FD9R6004 B From 3.80 -18.0000 100-00 No Ice 037 0.25 0.00 Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 045 0.32 0.01 g 4.00 1"Ice 0.54 040 0.01 (2)FD9R6004 C From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 037 0.25 000 Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 045 0.32 0.01 g 4.00 1"Ice 0.54 0.40 001 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] C None 00000 90.00 No Ice 11.59 11.59 0.77 1/2"Ice 15.44 15,44 0.99 1"Ice 19.29 1929. 1.21 (2)TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ A From Leg 346 30.0000 9000 No Ice 7.56 5,72 0.06 Mount Pipe 2.00 1/2"Ice 8.34 692 0.12 0.00 1"Ice 9.07 7.97 0.19 (2)TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ B From Leg 3.46 300000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5.72 0.06 Mount Pipe 2.00 1/2"Ice 8.34 6.92 0.12 000 1"Ice 9.07 7.97 0.19 (2)TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ C From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5.72 0.06 Mount Pipe 2.00 1/2"Ice 8.34 692 0.12 000 1"fee 9.07 7.97 0.19 (2)RR65-19-02DP w/Mount A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 6.10 441 0.04 Pipe 2.00 1/2"Ice 6.67 5.62 0.09 0.00 1"Ice 7.19 6.50 0.14 (2)RR65-19-02DP w/mount B From Leg 346 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 6.10 4.41 0.04 pipe 2.00 1/2'Ice 6.67 562 0.09 0.00 1"Ice 7.19 6.50 0.14 (2)RR65-19-02DP w/mount C From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 6.10 4.41 004 pipe 2.00 I2"Ice 6.67 5-62 0.09 0.00 1"Ice 719 6.50 0 14 E15S08P80 A From Leg 3,46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.23 0.12 0.01 2.00 1/2'Ice 0.30 0.17 0.01 0.00 1"Ice 0.38 0.24 0.02 EISS08P80 B From Leg 346 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.23 0.12 0.01 2.00 1/2"Ice 0.30 0.17 0.01 0.00 1"Ice 0.38 024 0.02 E15SO8P80 C From Leg 346 30.0000 9000 No Ice 0.23 0.12 001 2.00 1/2'Ice 0.30 0-17 0.01 WxTower Job Page s NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 9 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)522-2100 Crown Castle FAY(330)522-2101 1 tbowman Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement C14A CAA Weight or Type Hoc Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Vert ft ft f ft, x ft ft 0.00 1"Ice 0.38 024 0.02 E15S09P94 A From Leg 3,46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.66 0.37 0.01 2.00 12"Ice 0.78 0.46 0.02 0.00 1"Ice 0.90 0.56 0.03 E15S09P94 B From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.66 0.37 0.01 200 1/2"Ice 078 0.46 0.02 000 1"Ice 0.90 0.56 0.03 E15S09P94 C From Leg 346 30.0000 9000 No Ice 0.66 0.37 001 2.00 1/2"Ice 0.78 0.46 002 0.00 I"Ice 0.90 0.56 0.03 Platform Mount[LP 305-1] C None 0.0000 80.00 No Ice 18.01 18.01 1.12 1/2"Ice 23.33 2333 1.35 1"Ice 28.65 28.65 1.58 (4)DB845N65ZAXT A From 3,46 300000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 6.63 0.04 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2"Ice 6.97 7.80 0.10 g 2.00 1"Ice 7.57 8.69 0.17 (4)DB845N65ZAXT B From 3.46 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 631 6.63 0.04 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2"Ice 6.97 780 0.10 g 2.00 1"Ice 7.57 8-69 0.17 (4)DB845N65ZAXT C From 346 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 663 0.04 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2"Ice 6.97 780 0.10 g 200 1"Ice 7.57 8.69 0.17 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] C None 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 11.59 1159 0.77 1/2"Ice 15.44 15.44 099 I"Ice 1429 1929 1.21 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.69 4.60 0.07 137 1/2"Ice 6.18 5 34 0.11 0.00 1"Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 00000 70.00 No Ice 5.69 4.60 007 0.00 1/2"Ice 6.18 5.34 Olt 0.00 1"Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.69 4.60 0.07 000 12"Ice 6.18 534 0.11 0.00 1"Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17 7770.00 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.88 4.10 0.06 137 12"Ice 6.31 4.73 0_I I 0.00 1"Ice 6,75 5.37 0.16 7770.00 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 7000 No Ice 5.88 4.10 0.06 0.00 1/2"Ice 6.31 4.73 0.11 0.00 1"Ice 6.75 5.37 0.16 7770.00 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.88 4.10 0.06 0.00 1/2"Ice 6.31 473 0.11 0.00 1"Ice 675 5.37 0.16 7250.02 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 4.24 3.32 0.04 137 1/2"Ice 431 4.30 0.07 000 1"Ice 5.17 5.05 0.11 7250 02 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 00000 70.00 No Ice 424 3.32 0.04 000 1/2"Ice 4.71 4.30 0.07 0.00 1"Ice 5.17 505 0.11 7250.02 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 4.24 3.32 0.04 0.00 1/2"Ice 4 71 4.30 0.07 0.00 1"Ice 5.17 5.05 0.11 LGP17205 A From Leg 3.76 20-0000 7000 No Ice 1.95 0.50 0.03 1.37 12"Ice 2.13 0.62 0.04 000 1"Ice 233 0.75 0.06 LGP17205 B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 1.95 0.50 0.03 0.00 1/2"Ice 2.13 062 004 tnxTower Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 10 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main Sr;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbOWman Description Face Offset Offsets: A-imuth Placement Cvl, CA, Weight or Type Har- Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Vert ft ofr k fr' K ft ft 0.00 1"lee 233 0.75 0.06 LGP17205 C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 1.95 0.50 0.03 0.00 1/2"Ice 2.13 0.62 004 0.00 1"Ice 2 33 0.75 0.06 (2)TTAW-0000 112-001 A From Leg 3.76 200000 70.00 No Ice 044 0.15 001 1,37 1/2"lee 053 0.21 0.01 000 1"Ice 0.63 029 0.01 (2)TTAW-0000112-001 B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 0.44 0.15 0.01 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.53 0.21 0.01 0.00 1"Ice 0.63 0.29 0-01 (2)TTAW-0000112-001 C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 0.44 0.15 0.01 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.53 021 0.01 0.00 1"Ice 063 0.29 0.01 Pipe Mount[PM 601-I] A From Leg 0.50 0.0000 30.00 No Ice 3.00 0.90 0.07 0-00 1/2"lee 3.74 1 12 0.08 000 1"Ice 4.48 1.34 0.09 GPS-TMG-26NMS A From Leg 1 00 0.0000 30.00 No Ice 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 1/2"lee 021 0.21 0.00 0.00 I"Ice 0.28 0.28 0.01 Load Combinations Comb, Description No, 1 Dead Only 2 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg-No Ice 3 0.9 Dead+l 6 Wind 0 deg-No Ice 4 1.2 Dead+].6 Wind 30 deg-No Ice 5 0.9 Dead+l.6 Wind 30 deg-No Ice 6 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No Ice 7 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No lee 8 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg-No Ice 9 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg-No Ice 10 1.2 Dead+l.6 Wind 120 deg-No Ice 11 0.9 Dead+l 6 Wind 120 deg-No Ice 12 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg-No Ice 13 0.9Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg-Nolte 14 1.2 Dead+1 6 Wind 180 deg-No Ice 15 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg-No Ice 16 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg-No Ice 17 0.9 Dead+l.6 Wind 210 deg-No Ice 18 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg-No Ice 19 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg-No Ice 20 12 Dead+1 6 Wind 270 deg-No Ice 21 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg-No Ice 22 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg-No Ice 23 0.9 Dead+l.6 Wind 300 deg-No Ice 24 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg-No Ice 25 0.9Dead+I6 Wind 330 deg-NoIce 26 12 Dead+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 27 1 2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg+I.0 Ice+I.O Temp 28 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg+1.O Ice+1.0 Temp 29 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg+l.O lee+LO Temp 30 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg+1 0 Ice+l-0 Temp 31 1.2 Dead+1 0 Wind 120 deg+1.O Ice+1.0 Temp inxTC wer Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 11 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)522-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Comb. Description No. 32 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 deg-F10 Ice+1.0 Temp 33 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 34 12 Dead+I.0 Wind 210 deg+l_O Ice+l_0 Temp 35 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 36 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 37 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 38 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 deg+].O Ice+1.0 Temp 39 Dead+Wind0deg-Service 40 Dead+Wind 30 deg-Service 41 Dead+Wind 60 deg-Service 42 Dead+Wind 90 deg-Service 43 Dead+Wind 120 deg-Service 44 Dead+Wind 150 deg-Service 45 Dead+Wind 180 deg-Service 46 Dead+Wind 210 deg-Service 47 Dead+Wind 240 deg-Service 48 Deed+Wind 270 deg-Service 49 Dead+Wind 300 deg-Service 50 Dead+Wind 330 deg-Service Maximum Reactions Location Condition Gov. Vertical Horizontal,X Horizontal,Z Load K K K Comb. Pole Max.Vert 34 68.11 3 54 -6.13 Max.H. 20 40.15 4029 -0.13 Max.H,. 2 40.15 -0.13 42.59 Max.M, 2 3094.55 -0.13 42.59 Max.M, 8 2973.38 -40.29 0.13 Max.Torsion 20 1.33 40.29 -0.13 Min.Vert It 30.11 -34.86 -19.99 Min.H, 8 40.15 -4029 0.13 Min.11, 14 40.15 0.13 -42.59 Min.M, 14 -3094.84 0.13 -4259 Min.M, 20 -2973.30 40.29 -0.13 Min.Torsion 8 -1.34 -40.29 0.13 Tower Mast Reaction Summary Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque Combination Moment,M, Moment,M _ K K K kip-ft of'-ft kip-t Dead Only 33.46 000 0.00 0.11 -0.02 0.00 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg-No 40.15 0.13 -42.59 -3094.55 -9.92 -0.04 Ice 0.9 Dead+1 6 Wind 0 deg-No 30.11 0.13 -42.59 -3075.11 -9.84 -004 Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg-No 40.15 23.05 -3970 -2837.25 -1648.95 -0.76 Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg-No 30.11 23.05 -3970 -2819.45 -1638.57 -0.76 Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No 40.15 37.05 -21.40 -1555.74 -2693.75 0.92 Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No 30.11 37.05 -21.40 -1545.98 -2676.78 0.93 Ice 12 Dead+l.6 Wind 90 deg-No 40.15 4029 -0.13 -9.74 -2973.38 1.34 MxT ower Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 12 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 1531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle PAX:(330)571-1101 tbowman Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque Combination Momem,M, Moment,M K K K kip-ft kip-ft kip-t Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg-No 30.11 40.29 -0.13 -9.71 -2954.46 1.34 Ice 1 2 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg- 40.15 34.86 19.99 1486.38 -2592.89 0.97 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg- 30.11 34.86 1999. 1476.88 -2576.38 0.97 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind I50deg- 40.15 20.03 34.73 2561.50 -1478.18 0.33 No Ice 09Dead+l.6 Wind 150 deg- 30.11 20.03 34.73 2545.18 -1468.77 033 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg- 40.15 -0.13 42.59 3094.84 9.84 0.03 No Ice 0 9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg- 30.11 -0.13 42.59 3075.32 9.79 0.03 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg- 40.15 -23.05 39.70 2837.54 1648.87 0,75 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg- 30.11 -2305 39.70 2819.67 1638.52 0.75 No Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg- 40.15 -37.05 21.40 1556.02 2693.68 -0.93 No Ice 0 9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg- 30.11 -3205 21.40 1546.19 2676.73 -0.93 No Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg- 40.15 -40.29 0.13 10.02 2973.30 -1.33 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg- 30.11 -40.29 0.13 9.92 2954.41 -1.33 No Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg- 40.15 -34.86 -1999 -1486.10 2592.81 -0.95 No Ice 0 9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg- 30.11 -34.86 -19.99 -1476.68 2576.32 -0.95 No Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg- 40.15 -20-03 -3473 -2561.21 1478.10 -0.33 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg- 30.11 -20.03 -34.73 -2544.97 1468.71 -0.32 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 68.11 0.00 0.00 -0.33 1.64 0.00 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg+LO 68.11 0-00 -6-83 -528.19 1.51 0.04 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg+LO 68.11 3.54 -6.13 -469.81 -269.30 -0.05 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg+1.0 68.11 5.92 -3.42 -264.39 -455.24 020 Ice+1.0 Temp 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg+1.0 68.11 679 -0.00 -0,47 -524.57 0.23 Ice+1.0 Temp 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 68.11 5.62 3.24 254.99 -440.34 0.14 deg+1-0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 68.11 3.11 5.40 429.53 -246.20 000 deg+1 0Ice+1.0 Temp 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 68.11 -0.00 6.83 527.58 1.84 -004 deg+1.0 Ice+LO Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 68.11 -3.54 6.13 469.20 272.65 0.05 deg+1.01ce+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 68_11 -5.92 342 26378 458.59 -020 deg+1.0 lce+I 0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 68.11 -6.79 0.00 -0.14 527.93 -0.23 deg+1 0 Ice+1.0 Temp 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 68.11 -5.62 -3.24 -255.60 44370 -0.14 deg+l.O lce+1.0 Temp 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 68.11 -3.11 -5.40 -430.13 249.56 -0.00 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp Dead+Wind 0 deg-Service 33.46 0.02 -5.95 -431.29 -141 0.09 tnx'Towe'r Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 13 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 510 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)571-2100 Crown Castle FAX(330)572-1101 tbowman Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque Combination Moment,M Moment,M K K K kip ft kp-t krp-t Dead+Wind 30 deg-Service 33.46 322 -5.55 -395.49 -22994 0.18 Dead+Wind 60 deg-Service 3346 5.18 -2.99 -216.77 -375.55 0.23 Dead+Wind 90 deg-Service 33.46 5.63 -0.02 -1.25 -41449 0.21 Dead+Wind 120 deg-Service 33.46 4.87 2.80 207.29 -36145 0.14 Dead+Wind 150 deg-Service 3346 2.80 4.85 357.14 -206.07 0.03 Dead+Wind 180 deg-Service 33.46 -0.02 5.95 431.53 1.34 -0.09 Dead+Wind 210 deg-Service 3346 -3.22 5.55 395.74 229.87 -0.18 Dead+Wind 240 deg-Service 33.46 -5.18 299 217.02 375.48 -0.23 Dead+Wind 270 deg-Service 3346 -5.63 0.02 1.50 414.42 -0.21 Dead+Wind 300 deg-Service 33.46 -4.87 -2.80 -207.05 361.39 -0.14 Dead+Wind 330 deg-Service 33.46 -2.80 485 -356.90 206.00 -0.03 Solution Summary Sum of APplred Forces Sum of Reactions Load PX Py PZ PX Any PZ %Error Comb. K K K K K K 1 0.00 -33.46 0.00 0.00 3346 0.00 0.000% 2 0.13 -40.15 -42.59 -0.13 40.15 42.59 0.000% 3 0.13 -30.11 -42.59 -0.13 30.11 42.59 0.000% 4 23.05 -40.15 -39.70 -23.05 40.15 39.70 0.000% 5 23.05 -30.11 -39.70 -23.05 30.11 39.70 0.000% 6 37.05 -40.15 -21.40 -37.05 40.15 21.40 0.000% 7 37.05 -30.11 -2140 -3705 30.11 21.40 0.000% 8 4029 -40.15 -0.13 -40.29 40.15 0.13 0.000% 9 40.29 -30.11 -0.13 -40.29 30.11 013 0.000% 10 34.86 -40.15 19.99 -34.86 40.15 -19.99 0.000% 11 34.86 -30.11 19.99 -34.86 30.11 -19.99 0.000% 12 20.03 -40.15 34.73 -20.03 40.15 -3473 0.000% 13 2003. -30.11 34.73 -20.03 30.11 -34.73 0000% 14 -0.13 -40.15 42.59 0.13 40.15 -42.59 0.000% 15 -0.13 -30.11 42.59 0.13 30.11 -42.59 0.000% 16 -23.05 -40.15 39.70 23.05 40.15 -39.70 0.000% 17 -23.05 -30.11 39.70 2305 30.11 -39.70 0.000% 18 -37.05 -40.15 2140 3705 40.15 -21.40 0.000% 19 -3705 -30.11 2140 37.05 30.11 -21.40 0.000% 20 -4029 -40.15 0.13 40.29 40.15 -0.13 0.000% 21 -40.29 -30.11 0.13 40.29 30.11 -0.13 0.000% 22 -34.86 40.15 -19.99 34.86 40.15 19.99 0.000% 23 -34.86 -30.11 -19.99 34.86 30.11 19.99 0.000% 24 -20.03 -40.15 -3473 2003 40.15 34.73 0000 25 -20.03 -30.11 -34.73 2003. 30.11 3473 0.000% 26 0.00 -68.11 0.00 000 68.1 I 0.00 0.000% 27 0.00 -68.11 -6.83 -0.00 68.11 6.83 0-000% 28 3.54 -68.11 -6.13 -3.54 68.11 6.13 0.000% 29 5.92 -68.11 -3,42 -5 92 68.11 3.42 0.000% 30 6.79 -68.11 -0.00 -6.79 68.11 0.00 0.000% 31 5.62 -68.11 324 -562 68.11 -3.24 0.000% 32 3.11 -6811 5.40 -3.11 6811 -5.40 0-000% 33 -0.00 -68.11 6.83 0.00 68.11 -6.83 0.000% 34 -3.54 -6811 6.13 3.54 68.11 -6.13 0.000% 35 -5.92 -68.11 3.42 5.92 68.11 -3.42 0.000% 36 -6.79 -68.11 0.00 679 68.11 -0.00 0.000% 37 -5.62 -68.11 -324 5.62 68.11 324 0.000% 38 -3.11 -68.11 -540 3.11 68.11 540 0000% 39 0.02 -33.46 -5.95 -0.02 33,46 5.95 0.000% 40 3.22 -3346 -5.55 -3.22 33.46 5.55 0.000% 41 5.18 -3346 -2.99 -5.18 33.46 2.99 0.000% 42 5.63 -33.46 -0.02 -5.63 33 46 0.02 0.000% W xTower Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 14 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbowman Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reactions Load PX Py PZ PX PI' PZ %Error Comb. K K K K K K 43 4.87 -33.46 2.80 -4.87 3346 -2.80 0.000% 44 2.80 -33.46 4.85 -2.80 33.46 -4.85 0000% 45 -0.02 -33.46 5.95 0.02 33.46 -5.95 0000% 46 -3.22 -33.46 5.55 3.22 3346 -5.55 0.000% 47 -5.18 -33.46 2.99 5.18 33.46 -2.99 0.000% 48 -5.63 -33.46 0.02 5.63 33.46 -002 0.000% 49 -4.87 -33.46 -2.80 4.87 33.46 2.80 0.000% 50 -2.80 -33,46 -4.85 2.80 33.46 4.85 0000% Non-Linear Convergence Results Load Converged? Number Displacement Force Combination of Cycles Tolerance Tolerance I Yes 4 0.00000001 000000001 2 Yes 4 0.00000001 0 00014788 3 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00008032 4 Yes 5 0.00000001 000029929 5 Yes 5 000000001 0.00010927 6 Yes 5 0.00000001 000027423 7 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010268 8 Yes 4 0.00000001 000078894 9 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00045242 10 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00028819 11 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00011098 12 Yes 5 0.00000001 000026739 13 Yes 5 0.00000001 0-00010233 14 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00016474 15 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00008889 16 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00030058 17 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010985 18 Yes 5 0.00000001 000029468 19 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00011183 20 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00093829 21 Yes 4 000000001 0.00053781 22 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00026628 23 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010125 24 Yes 5 000000001 0.00027864 25 Yes 5 0.00000001 000010744 26 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00000001 27 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015183 28 Yes 5 000000001 0.00017401 29 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00016823 30 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015188 31 Yes 5 0.00000001 000016434 32 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00016044 33 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015248 34 Yes 5 0.00000001 000017467 35 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00017043 36 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015228 37 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00016330 38 Yes 5 0-00000001 0.00016039 39 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00001427 40 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00008413 41 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00005838 42 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00003076 43 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00007305 44 Yes 4 0.00000001 000005596 45 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00001409 46 Yes 4 000000001 0.00006916 tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page15 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main Sr.:Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX.(330)572-2101 47 Yes 4 0.00000001 000007899 48 Yes 4 0.00000001 000003128 49 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00005498 50 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00006377 Maximum Tower Deflections - Service Wind Section Elevation Har_. Gov. Tilt Twist No. Deflection Load ft in Comb. o ° Ll 108.5-100.5 11.403 46 1.0042 0.0054 L2 100.5-100 9.731 46 0.9865 0.0050 L3 100-82,083 9.628 46 0.9853 0.0050 L4 82.083-70.2338 6.340 46 0.7207 0.0012 L5 73.3913-60.1667 5.083 46 0.6573 0,0010 L6 60.1667-33.7477 3.408 46 0.5370 00006 L7 37.8773-30.5 1.382 46 0.3318 00003 L8 30.5-16.2083 0.902 46 0,2802 00002 L9 16.2083-12.9583 0,262 46 0.1490 0.0001 L I O 12.9583-9 0.170 46 0.1205 0.0001 LII 9-0 0.083 46 0.0889 0.0001 Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Service Wind Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature ft Comb. in ° ft 108.00 T-Arm Mount[TA 702-3] 46 11.298 1.0031 0.0054 20005 100.00 Platform Mount[LP 602-1] 46 9.628 0.9853 0.0050 8056 90.00 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] 46 7.682 0.8537 0.0030 4196 80.00 Platform Mount[LP 305-1] 46 6.021 0.6995 0.0011 4168 70.00 T-Ann Mount[TA 602-3] 46 4 627 06324 00009 8591 3000 Pipe Mount[PM 601-11 46 0.873 0.2763 0.0002 6389 Maximum Tower Deflections - Design Wind Section Elevation Hors. Gov. Tilt Twist No. Deflection Load ft in Comb. ° LI 108.5-100.5 81.537 16 7.1896 0.0378 L2 100.5-100 69.618 16 7.0625 00349 L3 100-82.083 68.883 16 7.0535 0.0348 L4 82.083-70,2338 45 413 16 5.1668 0.0079 LS 73 3913-60 1667 36 420 16 47131 0.0059 L6 60.1667-33.7477 24.432 16 3.8513 0.0037 L7 37.8773-30.5 9.907 16 2.3800 0.0017 L8 30.5- 16.2083 6 468 16 2.0098 00014 L9 16.2083-12.9583 1.876 16 1.0686 0.0006 L I O 12.9583-9 1.219 16 0.8645 0.0005 LI 1 9-0 0.596 16 0.6375 0.0004 Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Design Wind tnXToweP Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page16 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature ft Comb. in oft 108.00 T-Arm Mount[TA 702-31 16 80.788 7.1817 0.0376 2913 100.00 Platform Mount[LP 602-1] 16 68.883 7.0535 0.0348 1170 90.00 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-31 16 55.000 6.1154 0.0208 604 80.00 Platform Mount[LP 305-1] 16 43.135 5.0154 0.0066 595 70.00 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] 16 33.156 4.5351 0.0057 1216 30.00 Pipe Mount[PM 601-1] 16 6.260 1.9818 0.0013 893 Compression Checks Pole Design Data Section Elevation Size L L„ Kl/r A P. +P„ Ratio No. P. ft ft ft in' K K �P, Ll 108.5-100.5 TP12xl2x0.375 8.00 0.00 0.0 13.6954 -0.84 43140 0002 (1) L2 100.5-100(2) TP14.5x12xO.375 0.50 0.00 00 13.6954 -0.84 431.40 0.002 L3 100-82.083 TP 18.5691 xl4.5x0.1875 1792 0.00 0-0 110979 -4.74 78597 0.006 (3) IA 82.083- TP21.2603xl 8.5691 x0.7269 11.85 0.00 0.0 46.3823 -8.71 3418.84 0.003 702338(4) L5 702338- TP22.7702x19.0894x0.7502 13.22 0.00 00 53.1925 -14.80 3920.82 0,004 60.1667(5) L6 60.1667- TP29.0368x22.7702x0.8909 26.42 0.00 0.0 77.9321 -22.69 5744.37 0.004 33,7477(6) L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29.0291 x262755x0.9002 7.38 0.00 0.0 78.0218 -25.57 5750.99 0.004 (7) L8 30.5- 16 2083 TP32 2955x29 0291x0.8978 14.29 0.00 0.0 907691 -33.08 6690.52 0 005 (8) L9 16.2083- TP33.0383x32.2955x0.9036 3.25 0.00 00 93.4989 -34.58 6891.80 0.005 12.9583(9) LIO 12.9583-9 TP33.943x33.03830.9784 3.96 0.00 0.0 103.853 -36.55 7655.02 0.005 (10) 0 L11 9-0(11) TP36x33.943x0.7501 9.00 0.00 0.0 85.1399 -40.12 6275.66 0006 Pole Bending Design Data Section Elevation Size M,,, oM Ratio M,v +My Ratio Na M„ All, ft /UP-)" kip-ft om. kip-ft kip ft ox, LI 108.5-100.5 TP12x12xO.375 25.37 133.07 0.191 0.00 133.07 0.000 (1) L2 1005-100(2) TP14 5x12x0.375 25 37 133.07 0.191 0-00 133.07 0.000 L3 100-82.083 TP18.569lxl4.5x0.1875 267,46 29367 0.911 0.00 29367 0000 (3) IA 82.083- TP21.2603x1856910.7269 479.73 1341.93 0.357 0.00 134193 0.000 70,2338(4) L5 70.2338- TP22.7702x19.0894x0.7502 880.92 171443 0.514 000 1714.43 0.000 60.1667(5) L6 60,1667- TP29.0368x22.7702x0.8909 1671.84 3102.67 0.539 0.00 3102.67 0.000 33,7477(6) L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29.0291 x26.2755x0 9002 1832.03 3075.76 0.596 000 3075.76 0.000 (7) L8 30.5- 16.2083 TP32.2955x29.0291x0.8978 2556.62 4193.62 0.610 0.00 4193.62 0.000 (8) MxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page17 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Section Elevation Sice M. W Ratio My 4`M, Ratio Na M- M„y ft kip ft kip ft W- kip ft kilo-ft PM L9 16.2083- TP33.038302.29550.9036 2698.32 4423.22 0.610 0.00 442322 0.000 12 9583(9) LIO 12.9583-9 TP33.94303.03830.9784 2873-87 5032.30 0.571 0.00 5032.30 0.000 (10) LII 9-0(11) TP36x33.943x0.7501 3281.83 4447.82 0.738 0.00 4447.82 0000 Pole Shear Design Data Section Elevation Si-e Actual mV Ratio Actual T Ratio Na V. V. T T ft K K m n kip ft kip ft mT Ll 108.5-100.5 TP12xl2xO.375 344 215.70 0.016 0.54 202.31 0.003 (1) L2 100 5-100(2) TP I4.5x 12x0 375 3.51 262.09 0.013 051 20231 0.003 L3 100-82.083 TP18.5691x14.50.1875 17.65 392.98 0045 027 595.47 0.000 (3) L4 82.083- TP212603x 18.5691 x0]269 25-90 170942 0015 035 2721.02 0.000 70.2338(4) L5 70.2338- TP227702x19.0894xO.7502 32.91 1960.41 0017 0.37 3476.32 0.000 60,1667(5) L6 60.1667- TP29.0368x22 7702xO.8909 38.22 2872.19 0.013 0.13 629124 0.000 33,7477(6) L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29.029lx26.2755x0-9002 3964 2918.66 0014 0.25 6236.67 0.000 (7) L8 30.5- 162083 TP32.2955x29.02910,8978 4329 3345.26 0.013 0.60 8503.33 0.000 (8) L9 16.2083- TP33.038302 2955x0.9036 43.95 3445.90 0.013 0.67 8968.92 0.000 12.9583(9) LIO 12.9583-9 TP33.94303.03830.9784 44.78 3827.51 0.012 0.75 10203.92 0.000 (10) L11 9-0(11) TP3603.9430.7501 45.93 3137,83 0.015 075 9018-83 0000 Pole Interaction Design Data Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria No. P. M,,, My V� T, Stress Stress It tbP„ QM QM, OV OT Ratio Ratio LI 108.5-100.5 0 002 0.191 0.000 0.016 0.003 0.193 1.000 4.8.2 (/ (0 V L2 100 5-100(2) 0.002 0.191 0 000 0 013 0 003 0.193 1 000 48,2 V L3 100-82083 0.006 0.911 0.000 0.045 0.000 0.919 1.000 4 82 (3) V 14 82.083- 0.003 0.357 0 000 0 015 0 000 0.360 1.000 4 8 2 ✓' 70 2338(4) V L5 70 2338- 0.004 0.514 0.000 0 017 0.000 0.518 1.000 4 81 60,1667(5) V L6 60.1667- 0.004 0.539 0 000 0 013 0.000 0.543 1.000 4X2 2 33.7477(6) li/ L7 33.7477-30.5 0.004 0.596 0.000 0.014 MOO MOO 1.000 4 8.2 (7) y/ L8 30.5-16.2083 0.005 0.610 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.615 1.000 4 82 ✓•/ Job Page ' WxTower NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 18 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)571-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria No. P. M My V T Stress Stress )I op„ om,' +M,. �V OT Ratio Ratio (8) V L9 162083- 0.005 0.610 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.615 1.000 4X2 2 12.9583(9) V L I O 12.9583-9 0.005 0.571 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.576 1.000 4.82 (10) V LII 9-0(11) 0.006 0.738 0,000 0.015 0000 0.7�4r4 1.000 482 Y Section Capacity Table Section Elevation Component Siee Critical P OP.,,.. % Pass No. .lt Type Element K K Capacity Fail LI 108.5-100.5 Pole TP12xl2xO.375 1 -0.84 43140 19.3 Pass L2 100.5-100 Pole TP14.5x12xO.375 2 -0.84 43140 19.3 Pass L3 100-82083 Pole TP]8,5691xl4.5xO.l875 3 -4.74 785.97 91.9 Pass L4 82.083-70 2338 Pole+Reinf TP212603xl8.569lxO.7269 4 -8.71 3418.84 51.9* Pass L5 702338- Pole+Reinf TP22.7702xl9.0894x0.7502 5 -14.80 3920.82 72.3* Pass 60.1667 L6 60.1667- Pole+Reinf TP29.0368x22.7702xO.8909 6 -2269 5744.37 76.3* Pass 33.7477 L7 33.7477-30.5 Pole+Reinf TP29.029lx26.2755x0.9002 7 -25.57 5750.99 77.1* Pass L8 30.5- 16.2083 Pole+Reinf TP32 2955x29.0291x0.8978 8 -3308 669052 85 4* Pass L9 16.2083- Pole+Reinf TP33.0383x32.2955x0.9036 9 -34.58 6891.80 86.8* Pass 12.9583 LIO 12,9583-9 Pole+Reinf TP33 943x33 0383x0.9784 10 -36.55 7655.02 81.4* Pass LI1 9-0 Pole+Reinf. TP36x33.943x07501 11 -40.12 627566 104.5* Pass Summary Pole(L11) 104.5 Pass RATING= 104.5 Pass *Refer to Appendix C for calculations supporting the%capacity used. Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 9 APPENDIX B BASE LEVEL DRAWING tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 CRDM REOON ADDRESS usA xo 2m um) 2])2/C ro ro Ei Itw. 2) t/Y io w n uen .S�/a'ro m rr uen •• Iz) 2-e/a'm Ice Er sten far � �I z7�)ro m n uvn •�� // \\ \ • s 1 1 � ! s 1 1 � ••A• � O O I •• !! ellllll ro •• ((((Nor eunumao n len ••�•0• \\ / •• IrsrA,zmio.ao n Inn F ! ! ! e ! (Esrw W M •• • \ — / 22)zA'ro .m R len ff • CK MPr. 0O CNECPEDPY: SAL DRnenuc Dare vnvw • SITEN SiI NA.: ITE N4ME NY CULCXOOUE M220 BUSINESS UNITNUMBED NN". SIiE PDORES4 CUTCHOME.NY •as o2n swn .Da sawn 11936 2Y EUEfO4A CWN UEA P.T T. BASE LEVEL SNEEi NUMBER BASE LEVEL DRAWING Al-0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 10 APPENDIX C ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 All� Reinforced Monopole Analysis AMA, NY Cutchogue BU:806579 C;?[) CROUP 2012775.806579.01 Code= TIA-222-G-2 AISF= 1 Max Capacity= 1.05 #of Sides= 12 • i..0.1'" ahar9d. T.W. MP30-6 3 L41 73.5787 20.5386 0.1875 65 0.8 16 479.73 8.71 25.9 035 U.7 39.4% 51.9% Pass MP30-6 3 L5 60.1667 22.9987 0.28125 65 0.8 18 880.92 14.8 32.91 0.37 '.'0.7502`: 50.8% 72.3% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 L6 37.8773 28.093 0.28125 65 0.8 18 1671:84 22.69 38.22 0.13 0.8909 56.6% 73.7% Pass • MP30-6 3 L6 37.8773 28.093 0.28125 65 0.8 18 1671.84 22.69 38.22 0.13 0.8909 566% 76.3% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 L7 30.5 29.0291 0.3125 65 0.8 18 1832.03 25.57 39.64 0.25 0.9002 559% 74.8% Pass MP30-6 3 L7 30.5 29.0291 0.3125 65 0.8 18 1832.03 25.57 39.64 0.25 0.9002 559% 77.1% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 LS 16.2083 32.2955 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2556.62 33.08 43.29 0.6 0.8978 65.1% 83.9% Pass MP30-8 3 LB. 10.2083 32.2955 .0.3125 65 0.8 18 2556.62 33.08 43.29 0.6 08978. 65.1% 85.4% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 LID 12.9583 33.0383 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2698.32 34.58 43.95 0.67 ''0.90 63,4% 841% Pass MP30-8 3 L9' 12.9583 33.0383 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2698.32 34.58 43.95 0.67 490% 63.4% 86.8% Pass BP 94.75 3 L10 9 33.943 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2873.87 36.55 44.78 0.75 09764'< 69.1% 70.5% Pass MP30-8 3 L10 9 33.943 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2873.67 36.55 44.78 0.75 0.9784' 69.1% 81.4% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 Lit 0 36 0.3125 65 0.8 18 328183 40.12 45.93 0.75 0.7504 850% 88.4% Pass MP30-8 3 Lit 0 36 0.3125 65 0.8 18 328183 40.12 45.93 0.75 0.7501 85.0% 104.5% Pass GPD Modified Monopole Analysis-V1.00 • 520 Soo,h Main Streit•5olte 2531•Akran,Ohio 44311•PHONE 33o-572-2 roe•FAx 330172-2,m , GPD GROUP lob:2012775.806579.01 Calculated By TB date 4/19/2012 Engineers•Archlrects•Planners Sheet No- —Of I Checked By AIL date 4/19/2012 GPD GROI)P ANCHOR ROD TRANSFORMATION(Rev.GI Moment from RISA(M)= 3282 kip-ft Axial from RISA(A)= 40.12 kip Strear from RISA(V)= 45.93 Kip eta(q)= 0.5 Existing Rod Diameter 2.25 in. Distance from neutral axis(d)= 22 in.(CAD) Existing Rod Area(A„)= 3.98 in.' Fy 75 ksi Number Existing Rods(nE) a Fu 100 ksi Modified Rod(1)Diameter 2.01 in` Distance from neutral axis(d)= 23.5 in.(CAD) • Motlfietl Rod Area ha j= 3.17 in' Fy 127 ksi Number Modified Rods(nM) 4 Fu 150 ksi Motlfietl Rod(2)Diameter 2.79 in' Distance from neutral axis(d)= 26.385 in.(CAD) Motlfietl Rod Area(A„ )= 6.11 In' Fy 127 ksi Number Modified Rods(ri 4 Fu 150 ksi 'Taken from DSI Spec Sheet heal,= 19608.10 In" (Combined Mol of existing and post installed rods determined in CAD,Existing&Modified(2)Anchor Rod Capacity Controlling) I,aa¢1= 17576.89 in' (Comb)ned Mol of existing and post installed rods determined In CAD,Modified(1)Anchor Rod Capacity Cantrell!ng) f-= 175.86 kips M'(d)*Aerl/Icn, (Mod 1)f,= 166.91 kips (M'(d)'A..,)/In.....n+V/fnE+n M,+nM,)'.333) (Mod 2)fame= 323.79 kips IM'(tlPAmml,lt/irormol+v/1(nE+n M,+nM,)'.383) Axis= 2.32 kips A-(Aa)/(A®nE+nAmodnl oMln+nE+nAmodi,l-Mpl) (Mod 1)Axa z: 1.84 kips A'(nA„np,r)//(A-*nE+nAmodpj nMpi+nE+nAmod(,j nM„i) (Mod 2)Ax,od= 155 kips A'(nA—ah)//(Ao.'nE+nAmod„i'nMi,)+nE+FAmod,zi'nM1,i) Total= 40.12 kips Vm 2.65 kips A'(A,)/(Am'nE+nAmo4,i'nMi,i+nE+nAmodi,)*nMi,1) (Mod 1)Vases: 2.11 kips A'(nA,vy,i)//(Aa nE+nAmodi,�*nMU)+nE+nAmod„p'nM01) (Mod 2)V,,i 4.07 kips A"(nA_dp,)//(Ao'nHnAmodill nmi,i+nE+nAmodPl nMPI) Total= 45.93 kips Maximum compressive force in existing rods= 178.18 kips(fax+Ax„+) Maximum compressive force in modification(1)rods= 168.75 kips(f,noa+Axmod) Maximum compressive force in modification(2)rods= 327.34 kips(fmod+Axm,d) Ultimate Axial Strength:Existing Rods(fan)P: 260.00 kips Ultimate Axial Strength:Modification(1)Rods(frmad)= 309.60 kips Ultimate Axial Strength:Modification(2)Rods(frrnod)= 592.90 kips(based on pull test load of 502 kips referenced in PMI by GPD dated 8/26/10) Modification Rod(1)Rating= 55.9% Modification Rod(2)Rating= 56.656 Square, Stiffened / Unstiffened Base Plate, Any Rod Material - Rev. F /G Assumptions: 1)Rod groups at corners. Total#rods divisible by 4. Maximum total#of rods=48(12 per Corner). 2)Rod Spacing=Straight Center-to-Center distance between any(2)adjacent rods(same corner) 3)Clear space between bottom of leveling nut and top of concrete not exceeding(1)*(Rod Diameter) Site Data Base Reactions BU#: 806579 TIA Revision: G Site Name: NY Cutchogue Factored Moment,Mu: 1250.77 ft-kips App#: 145544 Rev. 2 Factored Axial, Pu: 18.56 kips Anchor Rod Data Factored Shear,Vu: 21.2 kips Eta Factor,q 0.5 ITIA G(Fig.4-4) Note: Reactions have been modified to account Qty: 8 for modifications Diam: 2.25 in Anchor Rod Results Rod Material: A615-J TIA G-->Max Rod(Cu+Vu/r)): 178.2 Kips Yield, Fy: 75 ksi Axial Design Strength,(P*Fu*Anet: 260.0 Kips Strength, Fu: 100 ksi Anchor Rod Stress Ratio: 68.5% Bolt Circle: 44 in Anchor Spacing: 6 In Plate Data Base Plate Results Flexural Check PL Ref. Data W=Side: 42 in Base Plate Stress: 43.9 ksi Yield Line(in): Thick: 2.25 in PL Design Bending Strength, 4)*Fy: 54.0 ksi 23.40 Grade:1 60 ksi Base Plate Stress Ratio: 81.3% Max PL Length: Clip Distance: 6 in 23.40 N/A-Unstiffened Stiffener Data(Weldingat both sides) Stiffener Results Configuration: Unstiffened Horizontal Weld : N/A Weld Type: Vertical Weld: N/A Groove Depth: in** Plate Flex+Shear,fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)"2: N/A Groove Angle: degrees Plate Tension+Shear,f/Ft+(fv/Fv)"2: N/A Fillet H.Weld: <_Disregard Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): N/A Fillet V.Weld: in Pole Results Width: in Pole Punching Shear Check: N/A Height: in Max PL Length Thick: in Isla Line Notch: n n tars at at of cD - t= BASE PL Grade: ksi otyi<r CKNESS Weld str. Iksi IiAnah°r, Typ, / STIFFENED CONFIGURATION ASSUMED IN Tool Pole Data oe / aC. Dam: 36 lin ° -A Thick: 0.3125 in -- -- nC� Inpat a- r spam Grade: 65 ksi A-1a, Ease #of Sides: 12 „o•,IF Round h s 0 L9R� Pale w/ DAM D Anchor Spacing Some As Stiff.... Spacing, xce EptCorner Anchor (Input Clear Space *'Note'.for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness or calculation purposes CClplate 1.5-Square Base F-G 1.2,Effective March 19,2012 Analysis date:4/19/2012 Stiffened or Unstiffened, Exterior Flange Plate - Any Bolt Material TIA Rev G Reactions Bolt Threads: Site Data Mu 33.63 ft-kips X-Excluded BU#: 806579 Axial, Pu: 1.12 kips Vn= 0.55*Ab*Fu) Site Name: NYCutchogue Shear,Vu: 4.68 kis =0.75, *Vn (kips): App#: 145544 Rev. 2 Elevation: 100 feet 40.50 Pole Manufacturer: Other If No stiffeners,Criteria: I TIA G 1<-Only Applcable to Unstiffened Cases Flange Bolt Results Non-Ri id Bolt Data Bolt Tension Capacity, W*Tn,B1: 56.81 kips 4"Tn Qty: 12 Adjusted W*Tn(due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.81 kips �Tn[(1-(vu/pvn)^zl^o.s Diameter(in.): 1 Bolt Fu: 125 Max Bolt directly applied Tu: 5.13 Kips Bolt Material: Other Bolt Fy: 105 Min. PL"tc"for B cap.w/o Pry: 2.806 in Strength (Fu): 125 ksi Min PL"tree"for actual T w/Pry: 0.654 in Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Min PL"t1"for actual T w/o Pry: 0.843 in Circle(in.): 25.75 T allowable with Prying: 29.98 kips 015a'51 case Prying Force, q: 0.00 kips Plate Data Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 5.13 kips Diam: 28.5 in Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 9.0% Thick,t: 1.75 in Grade (Fy): 50 ksi Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural CheckNon-Ri id Strength, Fu: 65 ksi Compression Side Plate Stress: 5.1 ksi TIA G Single-Rod B-eff: 3.14 in Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi cp"Fy Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 11.4% comp.Y.L. Length: Stiffener Data(Welding at Both Sides) No Prying 22.78 Contig: 0 Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)A2: 14.0% -lass Weld Type: Groove Depth: in** n/a Groove Angle: degrees Stiffener Results Fillet H. Weld: <-- Disregard Horizontal Weld : n/a Fillet V. Weld: in Vertical Weld: n/a Width: in Plate Flex+Shear,fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a Height: in Plate Tension+Shear,fUFt+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a Thick: in Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a Notch: in Pole Results Grade: ksi Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a Weld str.: ksi Pole Data Diam: 12 in Thick: 0.375 in Grade: 35 ksi m #of Sides: 0 "0 IF Round Fu 63 ksi Reinf.Fillet Weld 0 "0"If None G '0=none, 1 =every bolt,2=every 2 bolts,3=2 per bolt "Note:for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.5-Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective March 19, 2012 Analysis Date:4/19/2012 Stiffened or Unstiffened, Exterior Flange Plate - Any Bolt Material TIA Rev G Reactions Bolt Threads: Site Data Mu 33.63 ft-kips X-Excluded BU#: 806579 Axial, Pu: 1.12 kips Vn= 0.55`Ab'Fu Site Name: NY Cutchogue Shear,Vu: 4.68 kis W=0.75, 'Vn (kips): App#: 145544 Rev. 2 Elevation: 100 feet 40.50 Pole Manufacturerl Other llf No stiffeners,Criteria: I TIA G I-Only Applcable to Unstiffened Cases Flange Bolt Results Non-Ri id Bolt Data Bolt Tension Capacity, tp'Tn,B1: 56.81 kips a`Tn Qty: 12 Adjusted cp'Tn(due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.81 kips Diameter(in.): 1 Bolt Fu: 125 Max Bolt directly applied Tu: 5.13 Kips Bolt Material: Other Bolt Fy: 105 Min. PL"tc"for B cap.w/o Pry: 2.289 in Strength (Fu): 125 ksi Min PL"trea"for actual T w/Pry: 0.524 in Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Min PL"t1"for actual T w/o Pry: 0.688 in Circle in. : 25.75 T allowable with Prying: 39.53 kips 0<a'S1 case Prying Force,q: 0.00 kips Plate Data Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 5.13 kips Diam: 28.5 in Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 9.0% Thick,t: 1.75 in Grade(Fy): 50 ksi Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check Non-Rigid Strength, Fu: 65 ksi Compression Side Plate Stress: 4.1 ksi TIA G Single-Rod B-eff: 3.89 in Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi @'Fy Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 9.2% _,: z comp.Y.L.Length: Stiffener Data(Welding at Both Sides) No Prying 21.28 Contig: 0 Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)^2: 9.0% r-,_, Weld Type: Groove Depth: in"" nla Groove Angle: degrees Stiffener Results Fillet H.Weld: <--Disregard Horizontal Weld : n/a Fillet V.Weld: in Vertical Weld: n/a Width: in Plate Flex+Shear,fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)"2: n/a Height: in Plate Tension+Shear,fUFt+(fv/Fv)^2: n/a Thick: in Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a Notch: in Pole Results Grade: ksi Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a Weld str.: ksi } Pole Data Diam: 14.5 in Thick: 0.1875 in Grade: 65 ksi z #of Sides: 12 "a'IF Round Fu 80 ksi ¢ y Reinf.Fillet Weld 0 °0°If None _ # '0=none,1 =every bolt,2=every 2 bolts,3=2 per bolt "Note:for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.5-Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective March 19,2012 Analysis Date: 4/19/2012 Mat Foundation Analysis NY Cutchogue, BUM 806579 2012775.806579.01 GPD GROUP �I Code -'TIA-222-G Qxmax 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W Bearing On Soil Qymax 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W Foundation Type Mono Pad Qmax @ 4S° 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W Pier Type Round Ql,ip c—I 8.37 ksf Reinforcing Known Yes Controlling Capacity 32.2% Pass Max Capacity 1.1 f5(ot)x 2.09 >_1.0 0.9D+1.6W Moment,M 3352.710667 k-ft FS�ot�y 2.09 z1.0 0.9D+1.6W Axial,P 40 k Controlling Capacity 48.0% Pass Shear,V 46 k P M Pier Diameter,0 6 ft V Pad Length,L 20.5 ft HG Pad Width,W 20.5 ft Pad Thickness,t 4 ft Depth,D 10 ft D Height Above Grade,HG 2 ft t Rebar Fy 60 ksi LxW Concrete Fc' 3.5 ksi y Clear Cover 3 in Reinforced Tap&Bottom? Yes Pad Reinforcing Size k8 Pad Quantity Per Layer 18 Pier Rebar Size #11 i Pier Quantity of Rebar 24 I • % Lj�i Soil Type Cohesive Soil Unit Weight 115.5 pcfCohesion,Cu 2.5 ksf Bearing Type Net Ultimate Bearing 10 ksf Water Table Depth 52 ft Frost Depth 4.17 it GPD Mat Foundation Analysis-V1.01 Om"UTSON OP COVIM"S AND NSSTRICTIONS THIS CamiATION now by ARTHUR V. SUNOR this day of Harsh (1) residing at 810 Nassau Paint Noad, Cutchaquo, Now York 11933 (1) a d eentic or foreign corporation with otliose located at :« (3) a sols proprietorship or partnership having its prianLpal place of business at ? • x� hsreiMlter relerrad to as the DICLMIINTr as the owner of promise described in schedule W annexed hereto (here0atter rsfmr d to i fi as the PIANISM!) devise to restrict .tom use and enjoyment of said PRSNNIS and has for such purposes determined tb impose on said PaIMISM covenants and restrictions and does hereby dealers that said PAUXata shall be held and shall be conwyod subject to the following covenants and restrictlonel a, °" i1 1. DICLAMNT has lade application to the outtalk County , . ...j^ '. � Ospertmsnt of Health Services (hereinafter referred to as the DIPARTNRNT) for a peeit to construct. approval of plane or approval of a subdiplsion or development on the rums". i Cbl (SCDNa OSN COV 10/41) 7"" 2. (81PfCI1W LANtwAf38 TO IN881<T8A NSM -- 8E8 1ANPL8 PARAGMPNB IN MAR) , WHEREAS the DECLARANT is constructing a building at (Schedule A) All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Cutahogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more particularly bounded and described a■ followel BEGINNING at a point on the northwest line of Middle Road, (C.R. 48) 750 foot mors ar lass southwesterly along said line from Cox's Lane, said point being the southeast corner of the premises herein described and the south- west corner of other land of the party of the first part# RUNNING THENCE along the northwest line of Naddlo Bead, (c.R. 49) , South 25 degrees 52 minutes 30 seconds Nsat, 168417 rant to land of Earrie# RUNNING THENCE along said land North 60 degrees 54 minutes 20 seconds Nest, 252.6• fest to land of the Town of Southoldl RUNNING THENCE along said land North 23 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds Rest, 189. 13 foot to land of the party of the first part# RUNNING THENCE along said land South 56 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds Nast, 263.16 feet to the point or place of =GINNING. The DECLARANT represents he is aware of the requirsmants not forth in Article VII of the Suffolk County sanitary code. Should there be a change in ownership or a change in the operation, the DECLARANT or his assigns or successors in interest must notify the Suffolk County Department of stealth Services. s: (SCOWS GEN COV 10/16) 2 . "ver,•.. . .,.�. 3. The DiCLAPANr, its successors and/os assigns shall set forth these covenants, agreements and declarations in any and all leases to occupants# tomato and/or lessees of the above described property and shall, by their terse# subject sane to the covenants and restrictions contained herein. failure of the MCLAMNT, Its successors and/or assigns to so condition the lasses shall not invalidate their automatic subjugation to the covenants and restrictions. ♦. All of the covenants and restrictions contained herein shall be construed to be in addition to and not In derogation or limitation upon any provisions of local, state, and federal taw, ordinancess and/or regulations in effect at the ties of execution of this agreement, or at the time such iaw, ordinances, and/or regulations may thereafter be revised, amended, or prooulgated. S. This document is made subject to the provisions of all Iowa required by law or by their provisions to be incorporated herein and they are deemed to be Incorporated herein and imide a part hereof, as though fully set forth. n. . x (SCOW 0/p Coy 10/44) 3 1059 P! � •,,.. . . . ,,., •,,,,.,,., a . 6. The aforementioned Ssstriativo Covenants shall be enforceable by the County of Suffolk, stats of Now York, by injunctive relief or by aha► other remedy In equity or at law. The failure of sold agencies or Y the County of Suffolk to enfosce the some shall not be dewed to affect the Validity of this covenant not to tapes any liability whatsoever upon the County of Suffolk or any officer at swployee thereof. 7. These covenants and restrictions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the OSCLANANT# its successors and assigns, and upon all persons or entities claiming under thew, and may be torwinated, revoked or amanded by the owns of the promises only with the written Consent of the OgAnTNSNT, I. if any section, subsection, paragraph, clause, phrase or provision of these covenants and restrictions shall, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, be adjudged Illegal, unlawful, invalid, or held to be unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of these covenants as a whole• or say other part or provision hereof other than the part so adjudged to be illpal, unlawful, invalid, or unconstitutional. t scorn om COY 10/16) 4 a . 4, 10592 -PbM 9. Local Law 033-1910 - The OICLAPAMT represents and warrants that he has not Offered or given any gratuity to any official, employee, or agent of Suffolk County, Mau Task Itate, or of am political party, with the purpose of intent of seeuring favorable treatment With respect to the performance of an agresuent, and that such person has send and is fesilier with the provisions of Local Law 131-1910. LO La (ICOM GIM COV 10/11) 1 TAX LOT ,#17.5 N/O/F TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 10Q 8.151 2.2'NW N 23014'0011 E F E C E C A I N L I N STORAGE BIN 10.9'SW 10.4' 4.0'N W 17.7'SE 8.6'SE MONOPOLE G R A S S1 165'............... ................. . STY METAL & FRAME w k- z a •/ i G R A S S w wW N a:L� WFr LUZ> > �- N _ Z GATE z oCI a ti APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 00 VERIZON EASEMENT GA 0 I= I ( (RECORD-EXIBIT -A- V105786) 9.3'SW N D Fr 1.1 0 k I > y I (V o a l ( UNDERGROUND VERIZON M o�I I WIRELESS CONDUIT 0I I I: (RECORD-EXIBIT W V106723) C4 0 00 z I III ` Z ASPHALT PARKING Ld TAX LOT #19.1 EDGE OF ASPHALT AREA: 13.1'SW ; I45,589 Sq.F. I }� ,n a I N 1.0465 Acres I 30 a IASPHALT PARKING II __ROOF_OVER�14.85'SW I �v ------ 105.15 H X22155 a I� 110'CONCRETE FR MI 4 I I ;21855 1 3 7' ri METS a II (AUTO SHOP) I W No Vl 105.15' I _ i CO N GT R E-r� A V Al PTl^----- r O Ry 0 I �I -----------t d_0F7I VM------- - �oo Z. - J C� O m = O10, Z CL Iii a. i1 z 0 TAX LOT #20.1 r 2 z a ;I it a y nF \40 N/O/F CHRISTOPHER MOHR OJ to _vii Joj I. OD GR ASS 3 <n a I T22A?- Z III Ip GRASS mI 8iS � Iy'I I v� '(ACTUAL) 1I WOOD CURB zl� 7t750' (DEED) LILCO z 1.5'N N � w �I t2 UTILITY POLE TILITY POLE -/ X421 x/420 CONCRETE CURB ---� n - N URB 168.17' MARK-OUT) 41`....... S 25052130" W ( ELEC.M ii�r....... MIDDLE (120' VADE) ROAD NOTES: (C.R.-48) 1. THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON, FROM THE PROPERTY LINES TO THE STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE THEREFORE THEY (NORTH ROAD ARE NOT INTENDED TO MONUMENT PROPERTY LINES OR TO GUIDE THE ERECTION OF FENCES. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 2. CONSULT WITH MODIFYING ANY NE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT BEFORE OU OR EXISTING CURBS. WALKS OR ROADWAYS INTALLING OR THE STREET SHOWN HEREON. 3. SUBSURFACE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS BASED ON VISUAL OBSERVATIONS, VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS. AND/OU PRIVATE UTIUTY COMPANIES RECORDS, AND/OR UTILITY MARKOUT. THIS SURVEYOR ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY OF THIS DATA. S�1RVFY OF PROPFRiY L�-ATED AT: SUBSURFACE UTILITIES ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY AND/OR AND CUTCHOGUE COMPLETENESS. #21855 C.R.-48, 4. ALL SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATION AND DEPTH SHOULD BE RECHECKED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL GRADES SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE TOPOGRAPHICAL BUREAU. PREFERABLY IN WRITING BEFORE COMMENCING FINAL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 5. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO VISIBLE STREAMS OR NATURAL WATER COURCES IN THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON TNS SURVEY. STATEOF NEW YORK 6. REFER TO ARTICLE 36 OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW AND THE PROVISIONS OF INDUSTRIAL CODE PART (RULE NO. 53) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OR DISTRICT ....... 1000, SECTION 96 DEMOUTION IS COMMENCED. THESE LAWS REQUIRE EACH EXCAVATOR To GIVE BLOCK 1 , LOTS) 19.1 ADVANCE NOTICE TO ALL OPERATORS OF UNDERGROUND FAOUTIES OF HIS ••••••• INTENT TO PERFORM EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION IN THE SPECIFIED AREAS. 7. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN U.S. STANDARD MEASUREMENTS. w 8. EASEMENTS NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED- C REVISIONS OESCWPTION PN�AI�D GATE EWE T 8Y y 1. PROPERTY SURVEY AS CO. 06-04— ASC09112 o` �9 my copies from the original of this serve marked with an �Q�P �_. •,� riginal of the land surveyors embossed seal shall be Q• t onsldered to be valid true copies. Q t SURVEYED BY is ,authorized alteration or addition to a survey map bearing ARKADIUSZ JUSIEGA, P.L.S. licensed land surveyor's seal is a violation of section 7209. ^ ub—division 2, of the New York Slate Education Law. `•� v.;_ r ertlfication indicated hereon signify that this survey was 0 5lrId, reacted in accordance with the existing Code of Practicewil'11 Pm1r Scale: GV or Land Surveys adopted by the New York State Association ♦G� OLA 9 f Professional Land Surveyors. Said certifications shall run 58 East Beverly Parkway 1� 3� my to the person for whom the survey is prepared. and on dab No- DOOM is behalf to the title company, governmental agency and Valley Stream, NY 11580 - .AI ending Institution listed hereon, and to the assignees of the www.cacny.net UTN DESIGN GROUP. Inc. ending institution. Certifications are not transferable to TEL- 516 792-6676 ASC-09112 dditional institutions or subsequent owner. ' W `I 00 W WJ Z 0 W J a F ve a w o � w ■ wireless w r m _ _ U U H WEST NYACK, NEW YORK o W 2 � W 8 of W 2 O W LL LL WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 0 g VO >N >M> R W W W W CUTCHOGUE Y3 O LL f H U N o 21855 COUNTRY ROAD EAST ( C . R . 48 ) Lu Lu JLu W a La 2: 0 e 0 o CUTCHOGUE , NY 11935 0U Z F rc U � � w = Q 2 N U f Wo Q W 0 W U m ' 2 O m W LIST OF DRAWINGS LL ` 3 a 0 i SITE INFORMATION T-1 TITLE SHEET & INDEX " Wo - � U' > � _ ' W . , vw SITE NAME cuTCHOGUE A-1 PLANS AND DETAILS U G o N VW SITE NUMBER NY274 PROJECT LOCATION 132 SOUND AVENUE L)MATTITUCK, NY 11952 = a U w W F -1 ANTENNA INFO C a SITE TYPE/DESCRIPTION REPLACE (9) EXISTING ANTENNAS AT EXISTING LOCATIONS "'Sl, ',r` U) ADD NEW LTE CABINET IN EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER „ : o BUILDING CONTACT CROWN ATLANTIC d& ` ° 'z LEASING CONTACT. DICK WEYRHETTER Y U Y (576) 739-4629 O Q w } CONSTRUCTION CONTACT: PETE McCARTHY ,-. ■ z ,. (631 ) 649-2730 t f. /�/�/{■■■�yyy��, w Li ENGINEER CONTACT SCOTT M CHASSE v 860-663-1697 f, LATITUDE 41" 01' 46.5` N - £tr. LONGITUDE 72° 29' 50 3'' W r� ELEVATION 55" AMSL DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 096 d. h Cutchogue Z •. BLOCK. 001 ,h LOTS 19.1 Station '0 ZONE "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIALLu t� pie W Lu O F m U O wew K o m e "t. Z WCsSa J a W J ^W = 20 'x4' Q I - LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP a Y NTS SCALE: 1" =500' ZONING TABLE. CUTCHOGUE "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT EXISTING COMPOUND ITEM REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED ACCESS GATE (TVP 5PL( APPROVED FUTURE MAX HEIGHT (FT) 80 '1125 _ . LANDSCAPE In) NO �Y BUFFER MIN LOT AREA (SF/ 10 000 45 689 IVC MIN LOT v0DTH (FT) 100 168 17 NO REPLACE f.<,:7 ,.,,tP MIN LOT DEPTH (FT) 150 263 16 NC EXISTING LESSEE — - ""' J MINIMUM FRONT YARD TBACK ON 100 '75 NC GPS ANTENNA✓ EXISTING MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK-ONE (FT) 20 `15 2 NO (TVP 2-PL ) LESSEE D C MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK- BOTH (FA 40 d5 1 NC GENERATOR W �l Q MrY' ELECTRIC METER C MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK (FT) 70 `11 1 SIECOR FIBER Z �� IL a NC � F F Q A PR VED ''al' Q MAX LOT COVERAGE (X( 30 45 62 NO X " A r ww ¢ Cw P RE a l IL ELEc J 0 NA LOT APPLICABLE EXISTING LESSEE 2 ❑ [7 a w a n etr PCS "v 8 10 D 1 BATTERY RACK AT., ^ IVC NO CHANGE ELECTRIC METER -* a � = C I X N E 1ENT ' LL ` EXISTING DIMENSIONAL IVON-CONFORMITY ILL /197-423-144 N d D0 O O W d P D _ EXHAUST o w (1) TOTAL HEIGHT TO APPROVED FUTURE TOWER EXTENSION AND ANTENNAS FAN p 48 a X TE � � � w _ w C� ROU w �x W Fuj❑ p CABLE RACEWAY o w ROAD w MI�� _ wa " �Q X ° ° g L W LL MOD MODAC _ACK ACK � z5 saw "` � wX x 1oz � . ,. E� =;, �r�F =..a*(50 Ell Soe 4o 7 W 168 I x w H Q c w N i ' O m DESK HVAC CONTROLS W zI Na0 0 I � a 222 EXISTING LESSEE (12) PORT EIVTRVEXISTING PROPERTI' UNE PANELWITH (12) /�' ANDREW GPS ANTENNA HVAC GPS ANTENNA COAX CABLES RUN IN METAL EXHAUST VENT342 / 1 DUCT FROM LESSEE SHELTER TO EXISTING MONOPOLE f 3 w 71 NOISE CERTIFICATIONm f U � f THE INSTALLATION H THE NEW LTE CABINET IS WITH IIV g II — — — — — — — — —� —� ' THE CONFINES OF THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER Z mO W EXISTING 105-7 y, AGL AND WILL THEREFORE NOT CREATE ANY INCREASE IN u a EXISTING 24 X2d' NOISE LEVELS AT THE EXISTING FACILITY '' COVERED CABLE MONOPOLE U N K e m / (9( EXISTINU' LESSEE ALPHA BETA. AND GAMMA I BRIDGE W/(12) /' H COAXIAL CABLES SECTOR PANEL ANTENNAS 4 42 o,� 105-7' ACT TO BE 2 42 REPLACED W;(9) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED p c xyxV TO EXISTING MASTS U j W W W W " � `', COMPOUND PLAN ' 3 T,SHELTER PLAN 29 9' 'A-IL/ SCALE : 1" =10'x" �G \A- 1/ SCALE : 116" = 1'-0" Y 3 GRAPHIC SCALE o m U) X _ N Q i ( IN FEET ) uj J J W J y m N 1 Inch= 10 It Lu4 F EXISTING a BUILDING I LOT 116 1 w = Q o io I� Nm IN U f W Q W m O N N APPROVED FUTURE CARRIER POLE Z C v O N EXTENSION AND ANTENNAS � (7 2 > m LO 1 p W 1 J C W r o i o 0 IL (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA BETA AND GAMMA r U Q W SECTOR PANEL O I T E REPLACED W (9 I 05-7 AOL TO ) NEW PANELANTENI AS BQ O U i QO 1 „LLL 777 MOUNTED TO EXISTING MASTS Lu o i U' EXISTING MICROWAVE ANTENNA L L f } Q r PAVED 1 J �f _�� X0 . ZP AREA Q EXISTING 100MONOPOLE AMPHENOL AMPHENOL U u p 0 . s BXA-70090;SCF (LTE) BXA-171090/HCF (PCS) O w WITH A2 REVEAL BASE II /p 12 0lb- 11 0 Ibs um `,' N O 2 64 SF � N 2 Bd BF 1 'DEXISTI S LESSEE 12x26' EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND _ EQUIPMENT SHELTER bV- (2/ Q w Q 0 Q >- Z N Q EXISTING LESSEE EQUIPMENT SHELTER Z GPS A�JTEIVNA&121 !!. W COAXIAL CABLES Q d w L CJ u Y G Q r 0 Q x /; REPLACE EXISTIIJG LESSEE _ G U o W a` O l w a GPs ANTENNAS (TYP 2-PL( t j _ i O Q Q Q EXISTING LESSEE GENERATOR X80 : s'� 61� a r� �a1"� J 06 � GTj � Q � w Q `" ae AppROxED FUTURE ED i0 a Q D w Z EXISTING LESSEE (127 PORT ENTRY PANEL FRONT TOP SIDE FRONT TOP SIDE 'I ❑ D O F Q Q w WITH (12) //, ANDREW COAX CABLES RUN Q W Q 1 X11 > 5 F X Q W _ TOEXIS IN DUCT FROM LESSEE SHELTER PANEL ANTENNAS ❑ �uj �a O LL c1 W O Q TO EXISTING MONOPOLE I� I a > W H O W EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT SHELTER II � 7 � a > EXIST I c' 'YA-0/ I F ¢ O c ¢ EXISTING TELCO CABINET PCTEL ONO- - 1-120 X H U POLE ' ' ' _ I Q m m EXISTING T-MORILE EQUIPMENT PAD las .Jp �x3yv �XISTINGMONOPOLETO 2 J D GPS-TMG-HR-21V X TO 92 5' EXISTING 105-7L. AGL X _Z •' 15 2' - MONOPOLE W%APPROVED ..N 23� X W EXTENSION TO 108-11` x. �X 16a " W z nXIST I _� ._ ,— �,� X W O .QUIP I /(-�ti 1 X �X 1 Z m U R �X WTO w , w ,, m EXIST MONO- � �i ��X I t 1 1 -- W Y V 2 17 Q o POLE TOc _ �X _ I, Z K F _ X" N� GPS ANTENNAS w o e o �X, X TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Z J �+ W J �X XEXIST EQUIP Toe - LOT 17 3 SITE PLAN REFERENCE W c i z iSiIL < J .X X 1 CUTCHOGUE SITE NEW SITE PLAN AND DETAILS, COUNTY Q 0 C Q Q SITE PLAN ROUTE 48 TQ,NI`J OF SQUTHQLD SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW N J x < 3 YORK PREPARED FOR NVNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS STRUCTURAL NOTE Q M Y LL 4 COMPANYREV1 DATED 1INC 7 AS BUILT PREPARED �2�� 'WESTERN ELEVATION PLEASE REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SCALE : 1�� = 40'-0" BY E UE LIVI AND FJ HIES , INC E SOUTH ORANGE COMPLETED By OTHERS AVAILABLE UNDER AVENUE, LIVINGSTON NEW JERSEY 07039 �A-1j SCALE :1�6" = 1�-O�� SEPARATE COVER 2 DRAWING ENTITLED PROPERTY SURVEY' PREPARED FOR GRAPHIC SCALE THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC ON JUNE 4, 2009 GRAPHIC SCALE �' � j", PREPARED BYITEMEASUR ALEN EIJ SURVEYING °PTENGI -4 TANTENNA DETAILS 1 n= 3 SITE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY APT ENGINEERING ON 'i °I' _ pF "+ .� 0110/12 AND 0116/12 - SCALE : �/" = i'-0" `� �;.. . y i_ ( IN FEET ) " �_ 1mch= 40 h ( IN FEEL) `�" 1inch- 16 ft =,.ROS " ._„x �0� : b � ANTENNA DATA (LTE A-BLK) EXISTING ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS (LTE GBLK) OTT CABLE EXISTING PLATFORM WITH (9) MASTS SECTOR MODEL ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL DOWN TILT DOWNTILT STATUS SIZE AZIMUTH i ALPHA CELL ADA-85408580CF 2 - l,c 0 REPLACE )1 /' 1 10 �. , 1 Z O PCS ADA-85408580CF 1 - 0 I REPLACE � ("; 7 (PCSr4WS) ��� W ' BETA CELL ADA-85408580CF - REPLACE (1) '/," (CELL) - - �! ! 58 �� a PCS ADA-854080CF 1 - REPLACE (2) Z - � ) 10 (/�\ Q 10 (CELL, ij - - GAMMA � CELL ADA-85408580CF 2 REPLACE (1 PCS ADA�5408580CF 1 / 342 REPLACE 340 (X 10' o i 0 w 0 Orl! ' ii GPS N;A � REPLACE � ('_iNIA rcl ) - PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS - w m r r uwi � rD N SECTOR MODEL QTY ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL NO OF CABLE /(C )r; ) I DOWN TILT � DOWN TILT CABLES � SIZE r � 'J AWS) AZIMUTH 4 � EXISTING W� ) � fPCS� � r, i APPROVED 222 'I I 0 1 REUSE EXISTING 115 '' i- ALPHA BXA 7009) 4CF (CELLO LARI 1 - � � I � N XTENSION TO i BXA-171090-8CF (PCS AWS; 1 0 1 REUSE EXISTING 115 )LTE A-BLKr r ' � N 108-11 AGL �� m BXA 70090 4CF (LTE C B-B 1 - 0 1 REUSE EXISTING 115 (LTE C-BLK) (COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLh) 1 (t) / ' i ; w 2 BETA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - 8 1 REUSE EXISTING , 11 BXA-171090-BCF 'PCSA 'S � "` BXA-70090-4C8 REEEXISTI G _ - - � 8 1 REUSE EXISTING ; ' , - %, ; p U COMBINED WITH 850 (LTEA-BLIO I (1i y I u1 y 34' Z GAMMA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 3 1 _ I � � u a 1 REUSE EXISTING 342 'q 1 3XA-171090-8CF (PCS.'AW3 REUSE EXISTING 342 Sr 1 - .N- BXA-70090-4CF (LTE C-BLK, 1 - 3 1 REUSE EXISTING 342 8 $ . r COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLK( Z GPS NA EXISTING� REUSE - - , � OV N M Q Im x (2r RFS FTL8R5009 TRIPLEXERS TO BE INMASTS ON ANTENN PIPE AT EACH SECTOR (2)TOTAL TRIPLEXERS PER SECTOR K K \V} I� I CF2A1 4-LINES 3-ANTENNAS M4x Z (PCS/AWS) a O ypL N_ 700-850 700-850 PCS-AWSKKKN�I (LTE A-BLK) Q o E XPOL XPOL XPOL te r, LTE c-eLo a g /Vw J 7 w r (CELL) Lu Lu 0 806-960 1850-1990 MHz IftAmphenol A1 A2; A3 ) IN U f wj>' aw ADA-G3-F•fi3Fl•CF-CDN i� f91 EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA BETA AND GAMMA SECTOR Q' Z O fff ADA-F94•,25n,CF-FDIN �� PANEL ANTENNAS E m 105-T AGL TO BE REPLACED W,(9) j O L)E -- NEW PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING MASTS _ F,ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL a s SCALE : %z', _ 1. 0.. 0 .. _ ,. . ,x r - v o o PCS-AW S O z 7Foo ,w U � < ADA 85408680CF O U T 125# 00 DIPLEXER DIPLEXER Z r zgl U u o 0 m w 7AC8BPA 7AC8BPA H w p w z (TYP PHIL) W " a B a Q (D O 11 1, 1 1, 0) p O o I ❑ O ............. . �.�.,, ., — 00 } Q Z ADA 63406380CF O EXISTING EXISTING Y TVR BRIT) WGT 17# DIPLEXERoIPLExBR DIPLEXER o Q 7AC8B 7AC811 7AC8BPA 7AC8BPA Ef } W L- Z PROPOSED IV PROPOSEDo � o � I � w U) LU y v o v 1 'll 1710-2170 MHz B,Kq-/00'J'J•4C1 -EUIfJ- � SECTOR ALPHA BETA GAMMA BkA-I/11190-NCE-EIA. BASE WHITE BLUE GREEN 850 GRAY GRA Y GRAY LTE-C RED RED RED g _ LT ORANGE ORANGE ORANGE , � " PCS PURPLE PURPLE PURPLE BXA 1 71090-8CF - - AWS YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW (fYR 3PL) WGT 11# 1 GPS BROWN �,..�.. FUTURE W D cm U ❑ FUTURE o 11 41Z O Z F L LTE-7C m � � 0 PCS Z PCS S FRAME FRAME W O Z zO x Q S 0. 5 1 1 BXA 70090-4EF ALPHA BETA, GAMMA ANTENNAS : ) (fYR 6PL) b'VGT ,z# 2 - ,COAX GABLE DIAGRAM 6 ' L' J SCALE . NTS SIDE BY SIDE z