HomeMy WebLinkAboutBright Power PresentationsBRIGHT ,.c.
Tel 212.803.5868 11 Hanover Square
Fax 866.379.802& 21st Floor
info@brightpower.com New York, NY 10005
Portfolio Analysis for Solar PV
Opportunities in the Town of Southold
Prepared for:
Town of Southold
Prepared By:
Henry Misas, Andrew McNamara, and James Hannah
Bright Power, Inc.
May 14, 2012
?ortfo/io /qna/.vsis by Bright Power for the Town of Southo/ct
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4
2. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 6
3. Incentive Landscape .....................................................................................................................
4. Pord:olio Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 8
4.1. Landfill .................................................................................................................................... 8
4.2. Community Center ................................................................................................................ 9
4.3. Recreation Center ................................................................................................................ 10
4~4. Town Collection Center ...................................................................................................... 11
4.5 Police Department .............................................................................................................. 12
4.6 Highway Department .......................................................................................................... 13
4.7. Town Hall ............................................................................................................................. 14
4.8. Animal Shelter ...................................................................................................................... 15
~9 Human Resource Center' ....................................................................................................
5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 17
2
Portfohb Ana/ysis by £n~lht Power for the Town of $outho/d
Disclaimer
This report contains analysis and projections that are based on the best information we have available,
however this report comes with no warranties, expressed or implied. Bright Power Inc. shall not be held
liable for any losses incurred in association with the use of this report, including but not limited to lost
profits due to actions or investments made based upon the contents herein.
3
Portfo/~b Ana/ysis by Bright Power for the Town of $outho/d
1. Executive Summary
This report outlines the potential solar PV opportunities of the Town of Southold portfolio of
public facilities, determined from a preliminary analysis of each facility. Bright Power analyzed
each facility via the use of satellite imagery. The utility bills for the most recent 12 months were
also obtained in order to study the usage profile and current rate structure. Solar savings were
estimated using the obtained information. No site visits were conducted in order to perform
this analysis.
Table 1 on the following page summarizes the potential energy savings for solar PV at each
facility. It is presented in rank order from highest total solar potential to lowest total potential.
The Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) offers various incentives for interconnecting a solar PV
system into their grid. These facilities may qualify for either the Feed-in Tariff (FIT) or the rebate
program, and the table indicates which incentive program is most suitable for the individual
facilities.
Four out of the nine sites have a large enough potential capacity to qualify them for the FIT. The
landfill is the most promising candidate and if developed will convert the open land into a
revenue-generating asset for the town. The remaining five sites are suitable for installing smaller
systems that will qualify for a rebate from LIPA and will offset a percentage of the electricity
used at the facility.
The Feed-in Tariff is a time-sensitive incentive: applications may be allowed as soon as July 1,
2012 and it is anticipated that the incentives will only be available for a very brief period. Similar
first-come-first-serve FIT solicitations in other states have lasted as short as a period of minutes.
As such, we recommend that the Town focus on those sites eligible for the Feed-in Tariff and
return to those not eligible at a later time.
The next steps for the selected sites are:
1. To prepare project-specific feasibility studies to determine the technical constraints that
are present and the solar PV implementation strategy that will result in optimum energy
production and cost-effectiveness, compliance with regulations, and maximum
incentive allocation.
2. Following feasibility study, a bid specification should be prepared that would allow
contractors to offer their best system designs and prices -- on a level playing field -- to
the Town.
3. Contractor selection and preparation of submission to LIPA by due date.
4. Construction, interconnection, and commissioning of system. The LIPA incentive will be
awarded as the system produces energy.
If the Town receives a LIPA Award, we recommend a consultant experienced in solar installation
be retained as a representative for the Town to ensure that the system installed is safe, durable,
and will not cause damage to Town facilities.
4
Portfohb Ana/ys/b by Bn~qht Power for the Town of Southo/d
Table 1. Summary of Solar PV Opportunities
# Facilities Capacity{kW) {Awhile) (~W} { k~r~ offset by $0tar Suggested UPA ~n~e n~ive
1. The percentage of energy offset by the solar system may exceed the yearly energy usa9e by the ~acility.
In these situations, Net Metering allows the facility to sell excess generation ~ack to LIPA at a retail rate.
2. The utility I~ills o~ facilities that are suitabJe for the FIT incentive were not analyzed, as FIT installations are in front of the meter.
More detaiJs on the FIT arrangement and other available incentives are provided in Section 3 o~ this report
Portfo/~b Ana/ysis by Br~ht ?ower for the Town o£ Zoutho/ct
2. Methodology
The preliminary analysis performed on each facility involved the following methods:
· Satellite imagery: Google Earth and Microsoft Bing were used to observe the site
geography and building features, including size and of the roof and obstructions that
would cause shading on the solar panels.
· Phone call: The director of Public Worl<s, Jim McMahon, was contacted to determine the
location and site-specific considerations of facilities that had un-identifiable features
from the satellite imagery.
· The electricity bills for the most recent 12 months, if available, were obtained in order to
analyze electricity usage and rate paid.
The findings and savings estimates of this report are intended to be used for determinin9 which
facilities are the best candidates for further analysis. A full site assessment must be conducted
prior to any final sizing and savings estimations.
3. Incentive Landscape
The Lon9 Island Power Authority (LIPA) offers financial incentives to property owners or solar
developers that interconnect solar PV installations into their 9rid. LIPA is currently finalizin9 the
rules and application procedures for a Feed-in Tariff (FIT) incentive program that is targeted to
installations more than 50 I<W in capacity. Additionally, there is funding available through a
rebate program that incentivizes installations less than 50 kW.
· "In Front of the Meter Systems" (greater than 50 kW)
o FIT~: FIT installations are in front of the meter; therefore the electricity is fed
directly into the grid. In this scenario, the electricity consumption of the facility
will not be offset by the solar system. For installations that qualify for this
incentive, LIPA will buy the electricity produced at a fixed rate ot: $0.22/1<Wh over
20 years. The Feed-in Tariff is a time-sensitive /ncentiw applications may be
allowed as soon as July 1, 2012 and it is anticipated that the incentives will only
be available for a very brief period. Similar first-come-first-serve Feed-In Tariff
solicitations in other states have lasted as short as a period of minutes.
· "Behind the Meter Systems" (generally less than 50 kW)
o Net Metering: Behind the meter systems are so-called because they are installed
on the buildin9 side of the erectric meter and therefore reduce the usage of the
facility. Net Metering is mechanism that allows the solar system to feed power
bacl( into the 9rid when the facility is not consumin9 it, and the monthly
electricity bill will only charge for the net usage. Additionally, LIPA allows
Details on the FIT are not finalized at this time. LIPA has released limited information on the program as
it is being developed.
Portfo/io Ana/.ys~ by Bn~ht Power for the Town of $outho/c/
installations up to 2 MW in capacity to generate more electricity than what is
consumed annually at the facility. The excess power is bougl~t by LIPA at a retail
rate, currently set at $0.11/kWh.
More information about the Net Metering incentive can be found at~:
http://www, lipower.org/reside ntial/efficien cy/ren ewables/wind-m eterin g.htm I
Rebate3: Installations on municipal buildings that qualify for the rebate receive
$2/W up to 50 kW of capacity. The rebate is awarded once the installation is
complete and inspected by LIPA. While systems larger than 50 kW are technically
allowed, the incentive will be capped at the$100,O00 level for municipalities.
Figure 1. Landfill-sited 3 MW solar array in Kearny, NJ, completed in May 2012
2 The web page provides details on net metering for wind power systems. However, per conversations
with LIPA, this incentive currently applies for solar systems up to 2 MW in capacity.
] Buildings categorized as residential or commercial receive a lesser incentive amount than municipal. The
amount of rebate incentive is likely to change over time, as LIPA refines its incentive programs.
Portfo/io Ana/.vsis /~y Bright Power for the Town of SouthoM
4. Portfolio Analysis
4. 1. Landfill
Solar Opportunities
Tt~e capped landfill is the best opportunity in the town's portfolio for installing solar PV. The
area is open and can be developed into a large-scale ground mounted array. The landfill cap
and soil conditions need to be analyzed for structural feasibility before the array is installed.
Additionally, the grading also needs to be studied in order to determine the optimum array
layout. The solar area 1, as seen in the figure below, is located on the north-facing ridge of the
landfill mound. This area may not be suitable if the slope is too steep.
Figure 2. Aerial Image of the Landfill
Table 2. landfill Solar FV Opportunities
;in~tailatio~; ~stimated; FIT Revenue
Z G~eH~ Mount ~ff~ ~,~ .~z?~,.~2 ~ 390,25~
3 Ground Mount ~6,247 2,0~ 2,~6,7~ S ~7,~
Total 4,~9 5,~,2~ $ ~,276,93~
Porlfo/io Ana/xsis b3/ Bright Power lror the Town of $outho/cl
4.2. Community Center
Solar Opportunities
The Community Center has a large ground area behind the main building, which is suitable for
a large ground mount array. The director of Public Works indicated that this area is used by
children for soccer and lacrosse practice; therefore it may not be available for developing into a
solar PV system. It was also indicated at the May 8 Town Board meeting, that the area could be
expanded with the Eastern hedge row removed. With tree removal the size of the PV installation
may be increased by 50% in relation to what is shown in the table below.
Figure 3. Aerial Image of the Community Center
Table 3. Community Center Solar PV Opportunities
Estimated
insta!!at!on Estimated Production FIT Revenue
# M°unt Type Area (fi~) Capacity {kW) (EWh/yr) {$/yr)
I Ground Mount 57,322 344 411,687 $ 90,571
Total 344 4~.1,687 $ 90,571
9
?ort~o/io Ana/.vsl~ by Bright Power £or the Town o£$outho/d
4. 3. Recreation Center
Solar Opportunities
This facility has limited roof space for roof-mounted panels and some parking lot space
carport-mounted panels. In order to fully utilize the carport space, trees would have to I~e cut
down on the southwest parking lot space.
Figure 4. Aerial Image of the Recreation Center
Table 4. Recreation Center Solar PV Opportunities
i~St~ a~ ~ Estimated Production S0iar Savinss £~ersy Offset b,/
A~e~;(~) Capec~W (k~ {k~h/yr) (~/yr) Solar
Flush ~unt ~,2~ 10 1~,383 $ 1,~ 30%
Car~ 7,528 i ~ [~,~ ~ ~2,723 265~
Ground Mount ~,~ 143 ~,6~8 S 20,~ 420%
10
Portfo/io Ana/ysis by Bright Power for the Town o£ $outho/d
4.4. Town Collection Center
Solar OppoCcunities
The Collection Center has a large un-obstructed roof, which can be fitted with a flush-mounted
roof solar array. Both sides of the roof could be used for the solar system.
Figure 5. Aerial Image of the Collection Center
Table 5. Collection Center Solar PV Opportunities
Installation :E~Umated ~od~bn ~i~ Revenue
# M0untType ~a{~i) caPa~{kw) [~/Y~} , (S/Y~)
Z Flush Mount ~0,~6 86 98,29~ S 2~,624
Total 86 ~,291 ~ 21,~4
11
Porlfo/io Ana/ysis by £ri~lht Power for the Town o£ Southo/d
4.~. Po/ice Department
Solar Opportunities
The police station has two areas suitable for solar PV: the ground area adjacent to the street
and the root. The ground area is highly visible and could support a small sized ground mounted
array. The roof area is easily accessible; however the tall {lagpole next to the building will cause
shading impact on the system. In order to improve performance on the modu{es shaded by the
flagpole, micro-inverter or DC Optimizer technology could be used.
Figure 6. Aerial Image of the police Department
Table 5. Police Department Solar PV Opportunities
installation Estimate~ Pt~du~io~ 50 arsau ngs Energy Offset by
# MOunt Type Area(ftc) ~ (kW~l : (~/Yr) Solar
~ Flush Mount 3,~ 30 ~,749
2 Ground Mount 4,4~5 26 ~,~99
Total 57 63,~
12
Portfo//b Ana/ysis by Bri~Tht Power for the Town
4.~. Highway Department
Solar Opportunities
This facility has a long strip of available roof area. However, the director of Public Works
informed Bright Power that the building is likely to be demolished in the future, because of its
age, which would make a solar installation impractical since the solar system would have a life
expectancy of around 30 years.
Figure 7. Aerial Image of Highway Department
Table 7. Highway Department Solar PV Opportunitles
Estimated Percentage
instal[ail0n :capacity Estimated Production SolarSavings EnersyOffsetb¥
# Mount Type A~ea (~) ~kW) (kW~/yD (~/yr) Solar
~ Flush Mount 3,315 27 ~,~72 ~ 3,792
Total 27 29,~72 ~ 3,792
13
Portfo/io Ana/ysis by Bright Power for the Town o£$outho/c~
4. Z. Town Ha//
Solar Opportunities
The town hall has several roof areas that can be fitted with different racking options. The north
entrance has a flat roof, which could be fitted with a ballasted rack. The top flat roof has some
obstructions and thus is suitable for a tilted racking system that raises the modules from the roof
surface. The remaining areas on the roof are pitched and thus panels can be mounted using a
flush-mounted racking system. The multifaceted nature of the roof will require multiple racking
configurations which will likely increase the cost and decrease the rate of return relative to other
town facilities.
Figure 8. Aerial Image of Town Hall
Table 8. Town Hall Solar PV Opportunities
E~tima~d pe rcenta§e
[nStaiiati°~ Estimated PrOdbCt~on Solar Savings Energy OffSet by
~ MoUnt ~ype ~ (~t)~ap~(~) (kWh/y~) (S/Y~ Solar
~ Ballasted S23 4 4,~6 S 528 2%
2 T~lted ~,028 8 9,268 ~ 2,~86 4%
3 Flush ~ount ~,47Z ~2 ~3,263 $ 2,698 6%
Total 24 26,657 ~ 3,4~2 ~2%
14
Pori¢o/io Ana/.ysis by Bri~?ht Power for the Town
4.8. Anirna/ Shelter
Solar Opportunities
This facility has a pitched roof with several obstructions on it. An installation on the roof of this
site would be difficult and less cost effective than the other buildings. The modules would be
mounted on the southwest-facing area of the roof, avoiding the obstructions as can be seen in
the rendering below.
Figure 9. Aerial Image of the Animal Shelter
Table 9. Animal Shelter Solar PV Opportunities
Instal[~ti0n Estimated Production Solar Savings Energy Offset by
# M~un~TYpe Areaff~) ! capacity(kw) (k~h/¥~) I~/¥r) Solar
! Flush Mount 1,804 14 16,063 $ 2,088 14%
I Carport 1,790 21 23,907 $ 3,108 22%
Total 36 39,970 $ 5,196 36°4
15
Portfo/io Ana/.vsis by Bright Power for t/~e Town of ~qoutho/c~
4.~. Human Resource Center'
Solar Opportunities
The HRC has limited roof area for installing solar PV. The southeast facing pitched roof is
shaded by trees and therefore only a fraction of the available area can be used. The flat roof
area can be fitted with modules if a tilted racking solution is implemented that clears the
obstructions.
Figure 10. Aerial Image of the Humen Resource Center
Table 10. Human Resource Center Solar PV Opportunities
Instaiiatioh E~timated P~d~i~, Solar sa*i.g$ Energy O~[$et by
a Mount ~pe A~ea (~tz) Capa~ J~} {k~/yr) Solar
~ Flush Mount ~ 4 4,8~ S 617 6%
2 Tilted 395 3 3,5~ $ 452 5%
T~al 7; 8,~ $ 1,~9 11%
16
PorCfo/~b Ana/ysis by Bright Power for the Town of $outho/c/
5. Conclusion
The preliminary analysis presented in this report shows the potential capacity and 9eneral site
considerations for solar installations in the Town of Southold's public facilities.
The following 4 facilities were found to have enough capacity to apply for a Feed-in Tariff
incentive:
· Landfill
· Community Center
· Recreation Center
· Town Collection Center
The following 5 facilities were found to be good candidates for a rebate incentive:
· Police Department
· Highway Department
· Town Hall
· Animal Shelter
· Human Resource Center
The next step for the selected facilities is to perform a feasibility study that identifies site-
specific challenges and recommends solar PV implementation options. The facilities with
enough capacity to apply for the Feed-in Tariff faci[ities should be Southold's top priority, as
they are the largest opportunities and those with the shortest time window to apply for the
incentive. A feasibility study would entail analysis of the structural capacity of the landfill cap
and the regufatory framework that would allow a system to be installed on it. Additionally, LIPA
should be contacted as soon as the facility is chosen as a solar candidate. The utility has a
rigorous application process in place to interconnect solar PV systems into its grid and their
involvement early in the process will lead to a successful installation. The deadline for applying
to the Feed-in Tariff is not yet known, but may be as soon as July 1, 2012.
17
BRIGHT ~ER
Preliminary Solar Feasibility Study and Next
Steps for the Town of Southold
LIPA Announces Feed In Tariff
[] 50 Megawatts of capacity
[] Power sold directly into the LIPA grid at
$0.22/kWh for 20 years
[] Open to systems of 50 kW or over in capacity
System Size 50kW-150 kW 151 kW- 500 kW 500 kW +
Capacity Allotment 5 MW 10 MW 35 MW
BRIGHT ~ER
What is a Feed In Tariff?
Solar Pamels luf~ phol~ from
the sun into DC c.~-~:r~ily. ~
~ (~4.~ ALLACix;,weroreated,s. fed
~,ok~l to your 6,,n~rgy provider
for ~le to the
The "(~RC~S fe~l in" r~ete¢ instaJled in your
$01~' Syslem pro<A~ce<a.
Image courtesy of Harvey Norman Solar BRIGHT ~ER
Timing of the FIT
[] Proposed FIT announced on 4/20/12
[] Public hearing on 6/4/12
[] LIPA board meeting on 6/28/12
[] Enrollment period opens on 7/1/12
[] Projects will be selected on a first come, first
serve basis
BRIGHT ~ER
Ground Mount
BRIGHT ~ER
Tilted Plane
BRIGHT ~ER
Ballasted
BRIGHT ~ER
Flush Mount
BRIGHT ~ER
Car Port
BRIGHT ~ER
Landfill at Cox Lane
I Estimated I
Installation Estimated Production I FiT Revenue
# Mount Type Area (ft2) Capacity (kW) (kWh/yr) I ($/yr)
:1 Ground Mount 214,927 1,290 1,543,606 I $ 339,593
2 Ground Mount 246,990 1,482 :1'773'882 I $ 390,254
3 Ground Mount 346,247 2,077 2,4861746 J $ 547,084
Total 4,849 5,804,234 I $ 1,276,931
BRIGHT ~ER
Town of Southold Landfill - Developer's Proforma -wi $100,000/yr lease payment
Financial Summary c~ PVImmstment
K~y A~umptionl lad Incentives:
9/stem F~rameters Ene~ Par~meter~
Optione active Option
Rnan¢lal Paramaters
Active N~tee
BRIGHT
Tel 2128035868
Fax 866.379.8026
info~brightpower,com
21st Floor
New YoHc, NY 10005
Year 1 Year 2 Year_~ Y~ar Year ~ Year ~ __ Year: Yeast Year 1~ Year 11 Year 1; Year 1_~3
~nnual Cash Flow (~r~.~O S1,~ S1~ ~1~1 ~ ~ S7~ ~1,1~ S71~7 S~ ~7~ ~,864 S~7,~(
~Cumulative Ca~ Flow . {~g~ ~--~~--~(~1~ (~,~ 111 (Sl,e1~ (~ S1~ ~.1~ ----S1~1 ~ ~5,128 S~1.~ ~4 ~4~138_ S5,123,9~
Y~r ta YMr 15 Y~r 1i ~r 11 Y~r ~ YW 1' Yw 2 Y~r 2~ Y~r~ Y~r 2; Y~r 24 Year 25
~nual ~sh Flow
NPV (25 yea~) $3A~,962
Simple Payback Pedod 5.8 Yea~
Rate of m~rn 17.37%
Cumulative Cash Flow
Southold Community Center
I I Installation
# Mount Type Area (ft2)
I Ground Mount I 57,322
Total
Estimated
Capacity (kW)
344
Estimated
Production
(kWh/yr)
411,687
411,687
FiT Revenue
($/yr)
$ 90,571
$ 90,571
BRIGHT ~ER
Southold Town Collection Center
Estimated Estimated I Percentage
Installation Production SolarSavings I Energy Offset by
# Mount Type I Area (ft2) Capac ty (k (kWh/yr) ($/yr) I Solar
I Flush Mount I 10,806 98,291 $ 12,286 I 100%
Total 98,291 $ 12,286 / 100%
BRIGHT ~ER
Next Steps
Feasibility Studies
Bid Specifications
r Bid Review and Contractor
Selection
r Construction Oversight
BRIGHT ~ER
Feasibility Study
~ Site Survey(s)
u Analysis of New York/Suffolk County technical requirements for Solar PV systems
~ Analysis of environmental constraints, including shading and available area, topography
u Analysis of economic feasibility of installing a solar energy system
~ Confirm sizing of the solar electric system for the site based on location, site characteristics, orientation, and roof
or site size and roof inclination, topography
~ Assessment of available solar PV modules and mounting systems
[] Estimate installation cost for proposed system and/or expected lease amount
[] Concepts for mounting/attachment details
,~ Engage with LIPA to determine if interconnection is feasible at site
~; Work with electrical, environmental, and structural engineers and other professionals retained or employed by
Town to assess feasibility of solar deployment at Town facilities
[] review of load limits, existing conditions, topography, usable area, current maintenance requirements,
settlement & cap repair plans (landfill), storm water management, and erosion control together with the
relevant Town professional
r~ Recommendations on best practices to ensure a safe installation that minimizes the impact of the solar
installation on Town facilities
[] Begin preliminary discussions with potential bidders to identify issues and ensure buy-in
Review of project ownership models
[] Review landfill's site assessment, closure plan, and closure certification approval
Deliverable: Feasibility report(s)
BRIGHT ~ER
Bid Specification
[] Dimensioned visual of solar PV layout and definition of allowable areas
[] Development of technical specifications detailing the criteria that PV
System as a whole as well as individual components (Modules, Racking,
Inverters, Balance of Systems, and Monitoring)
[] Client may provide their standard standard bid package, if available to which we will attach
the technical specifications and bid requirements
[] Development of bid criteria and list of information bidders are required to
provide
[] Development of list of at least five qualified bidders for the project
[] Up to three conference calls/meetings to review bid specification details
with Client
Detailed structural and/or electrical plans by others (note: we assume that
contractor will be responsible for these and will not be needed from Bright
Power)
[] Deliverables: Technical bid specification and bidders list
BRIGHT ~ER
Bid Review and Contractor Selection
[] Follow up meetings/calls with bidders to request
additional detail and/or clarify aspects of proposal(s)
[] Creation of bid matrix for levelized comparison of
bidders
Up to two conference calls/meetings with Client to
review bidders
[] Recommend bidder(s) to Client
[] Due diligence review of Town's preferred bidder
[] Deliverables: Bid matrix, recommended bidder
report
BRIGHT F~WER
Design & Construction Oversight
Review and approve design submittals provided by chosen
contractor, or liase with relevant Town professional to complete
review and approval
[] Participate in up to twelve design progress meetings to ensure
contractor is meeting specifications provided
[] Construction kick-off meeting led by Bright Power
[] Review submittals provided by chosen contractor to ensure
compliance
[] Update client on construction progress and identify any deficiencies
in contractor's work as they relate to bid specification or
manufacturer's recommendation (max 5 visits)
[] Inspection of site(s)
[] Deliverables: Inspection Reports for submission to Client
BRIGHT ~ER
Sites with Less Solar Capacity
[] Recreation Center
[] Police Department
[] Highway Department
[] Town Hall
[] Animal Shelter
[] Human Resource Center
-LIPA currently offers a rebate of $2.00/Watt for
municipal solar PV installations
BRIGHT ~ER
Recreation Center
I I Estimated I I Percentage
Installation Estimated Production I Solar Savings I Energy Offset by
# Mount Type Area (ft2) Capacity (kW) (kWh/yr) I ($/yr) I Solar
! Flush Mount 1,283 :10 11,383 [ $ 2,504 I 37%
2 Carport 7,528 90 100,183 { $ 22,040 100%
Total 101 111,565 ~ ~ 24,544 100%
BRIGHT ~ER
Police Station
Estimated ~
Installation Estimated Production
# Mount Type Area (ft2) Capacity (kW) (kWh/yr) I . ($/yr) __ _ I Solar
1 Flush Mount 3,804 30 33,749 I ~ _4,_2_8_6 I 23%
2 Ground Mount 4,4:15 26 30,199 I ~ 5_,_~:~_5 I 20%
Total 57 63,948 I :a ~,1Zl I 43%
BRIGHT ~ER
Highway Department
Total
Estimated
Installation Capacity
Area (ft2) (kW)
Estimated Percentage
Production Solar Savings Energy Offset by
(kWh/yr) ($/yr) Solar
3,315 27 29,172 $ 3,676 100%
27 29,172 $ 3,676 100%
BRIGHT ~ER
Town Hall
I Estimated Percentage
Installation Estimated I P~~ings I Energy Offset by
# MountType Area(ft2) Capacity(kW)I (kWh/yr)_ ___~ ~ ($/yr) _ I Solar
I Ballasted 523 41 _?__~ I ~ S2"l 2%
2 Tilted 1,028 / 81 __.,_~t_~ I ~ 1, L~71 4%
3 Flush Mount 1,471 J 12 ' 6%
BRIGHT P~WER
Animal Shelter
Installation Estimated Production Solar Savings Energy Offset by
# MountType Area(fi2) Capacity(kW) (kWh/yr) ($/yr) Solar
i Flush Mount 1,804 14 16,063 $ 2,040 19%
Total 14 16,063 $ 2,040 19%
BRIGHT ~ER
Human Resources Center
I Estimated I Percentage
Installation Estimated Production Solar Savings Energy Offset by
# Mount Type Area (ft2) Capacity (kW) (kWh/¥r) ($/¥r) I Solar
I Flush Mount 540 4 4,899 $ 598 I 7%
2 Tilted 395 3 3,583 $ 437I
Total 7 8,482 $ 1,035 I 12%
BRIGHT POWER