Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-96.-1-19.1 (5)
SITE INFOF~MATION: ZONE: LATITUDE: LONDI11JDE: eaROUND ELEVATION: EXISTINr~ USE: PROPOSED USE: LOT SIZE: TOTAL LEASE AREA: "LI" LBHT INDUSTRIAL N41° 01' 4&.3¢ NAD S3 H'/'~° ~q' EOB&" NAD S3 &O'-O" AMSL (NAVDSS) AUTOMOBILE REPAIR AND ~U~LI~ UTILITY TELECONHUNICATION~ PA~ILI~ NO CHANDE Dt~AWlNG LIST: SHEET Z-I Z-2 Z-2A Z-4 TITLE SHEET PROPERTY MAP3 ~ INFORMATION SITE PLAN ¢ ZONIN5 INFORMATION PROPOSED EQUIPMENT OFFSETS PARTIAL SITE PLAN ~ EQUIPMENT PLAN HONOPOLE ELEVATION ~ DETAILD E~UIPMENT DETAILD CONTACTS: SITE CONTACT: ARTHUR JUNEE - 60D-535-SqS2 OHNER INFORMATION: APPLICANT: ATTORNEY: ARTHUR JUNSE 4IS MOULTON HILL ROAD LYHAN, NH ODDSD HETRO PCS NEH YORK, L.L.C. 5 SKYLINE DRIVE HAHTHORNE, NY 10552 RE, NIELSEN, HUBER ¢ COUDHLIN, LLP S& NORTH NE!~ YORK AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NY II"NS TEL. (&BI) 423-4100 FAX. (631) 423-4104 SCOPE OF - INSTALLATION OF (4) E~IPi,4ENT CABINETD ON NEH CONCRETE SLAB. - iNSTALLATION OF A S'-&' MONOPOLE EXTENSION. - INSTALLATION OF (&) PANEL ANTENNAS ON NE~ ~UPPORT F~HE ~EOURED TO MONOPOLE EXTENSION. INSTALLATION OP N~ e' ~1~ CHAIN LINK ~NC~ AN~ 4' ~1~ ACCESS ~ATe NTH ~IVAC~ SLATS AN~ ~A~ ~ TO ~ATC~ ~X~STIN~. INSTALLATION O~ 60AXIAL 6A~L~S ~O~T~ ALON~ N~ 6ABLE ~l~e TO TOUR NOTES: Ij CONST~CTION TO CONFORH TO THE STANDARD3 AND SI~ClFICATiONS OF THE TOHN OF SOUTHOLD. 2) THE PROPOSED COMPOUND IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY AND THEREFORE NO PARKIN~ HAS BEEN PROVIDED. DJ THE PROPOSED MOBILE EQUIPMENT DOES NOT REQL~IRE A PE~,MANENT EMPLOYEE OCCUPANCY, IT IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY, AND THEREFORE REQUIRES NO POTABLE HATER, SANITARY SEN-'RS AND DOES NOT REI2UIRE ANY ADDITIONAL SITE PARKIN¢. 4.) THIS SlT~ HILL BE VISITED ON AN AVERADE EVERY FOUR TO SIX HEEK PERIOD FOR MAINTt-'NANCE AND SHALL BE t,4ONITORED FROM A REHO"~ FACILITY. 3.) THIS PROPOSED SITE ONLY REc~UIRES ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE UTILITIES. CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY I.JPON APPROVAL, &.) SITE LISHTiNr~ HILL BE REQUIRED. 9.) THESE DRAHIN~S ARE ERIN5 PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF MUNICIPAL AND AOENDY REVIEH AND APPROVAL. THESE DRAHINDS 3HALL NOT BE UTILIZED FOR CONDTI;tUe.,TION PURPOSES, UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. SITE #: NY7314 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 SUFFOLK COUNTY DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 96 BLOCK: 1 LOT: 1g.1 ZONE: "LI" ,,LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SCALE: ["'-C6oo' ~1'1}I1) APpROXI MATE ~-~ ~mgr~cATmo~ TOPOGRAPHIC. MAP: TO~N OF SOUTHOLD SCALE!: 1"=1200' (llxll) 5CALF:: P':600' (22x34) &oo' qO0' ' 12oo' o' 1200' BOO' 2400' ESI ARCHITECTURE ENOlNEERIN~ P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 Lou Moglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ - # A113345 NY - # 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ -/4 GE 36209 NY - $ 075384 CT - # 22375 PA - # O61412 OD/B/II RE-ISSUED FOP. FILIN® OD/OD/II RE-ISSUED FOP. FILIN6 DEAL RD,/IDION DATE DESORIPTION Wireless for All. ~T. UO~*, Oq~PSTSOI4 SITE INFOI~IVlATION 218~ COUNTY ROAD 48 OUTCHO~U~:, NY' I Iq~ ~LJFF=OLt<. OOUNT'f ~ESI~N TTPE: CO-LOCATION SHEET TITLE -71 TI ~1 ' OD/Il/lO I T--I'~ T NUMBER ~.EV. LOT NUMBER LEGEND: " TOP NUM. = DISTRICT MID. NUM. = SECTION ~ . MID. NUM. = BLOCK -.. N BOTTOM NUM. -- LOT 96 17,5 84 '- 32.1 / /~ IAPPROXIMATE ~""~'~-,~,/ :. '~ ~. ISlT'E LOCATION] ~' i/~' '- ./ 1000 96 16 SEC BLK LOT PROPERT'(ADDRESS OWNER INFORMATION OWNER ADDRESS ZONE E~STING LAN~D USE 84 1 29.3 22355 CR 48 372 Jericho Carp .)2355 CR 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 LI Warehouse 84 1 32.1 6264 Cox Lane Corazzin[ Realty, LLC ~O Box 1281, Cutchogue, NY 11935 LI Warehouse 84 4 I 5455 Cox Lane Cutchogue Fire District .)60 New Suffolk Read, Cutchogue, NY 11935 AC Field Crops 96 1 13.1 :1405 CR 48 First Baptist Church ~1405 CR 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 R~40 Religious 96 1 14 735 Church Lane Viola S, Cross gO Box 184, Cutchogue, NY 11935 R40 Single Fa.dy Reslidential 96 1 15 ;35 Church Lane Jeaneffe Steward 52B Old Country Road, Westhampton, NY 11977 R4O Single Family Resddential 96 1 16 .85 Church Lane Frances L, Arnold & Roland Wilson 'O Box 535, Cutchogue, NY 11935 R~0 ~ingle Family Res~idential 96 1 17.5 6155 Cox Lane Town of Southold 53095 Route 25, Southold, NY 11971 LI -andfill 96 1 18.2 21755 CR 48 Robert & Barbara Taylor PO Box 462, Cutchogue, NY 11935 R-40 3ingle Famlly Resddential 96 1 18.3 21775 CR 48 Jennie L Taylor 1425 Gabriella Cour[, Mattltuck, NY 11952 R-40 9~ngle Family Resudential 96 I 20.1 22155 CR 48 27A North LLC PO Box 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 LI ~/arehouse 96 2 7 21250 CR 48 Rhx Corp. 591-A Bicycle Path, Port Jefferson Station, NY 1177~ AC Field Crops 96 2 8 21750 CR 48 Town of 8outhold 53095 Route 25, Southald, NY 11971 AC Residential Vacant Land INOTE= INPO~iqATION / T--~--LATEST pROPEATY OPINER OF 50UTHHOLDI OBTAINED F~O~ TH~ TO~N I INFOFRMATION $URF~OUNDING PROPEF~T¥ OUJNEF~$ NTS. 1000 96 18.3 1000 96 1 15 1000 96 " 1 14 1000 ~Q)e 96 1 / 1000 // 84 1 26.3 //1000 20.1 1000 96 1 18.2 © 1000 84 4 1000 2 84 84 ,, 1000 96 --2 8 DISTRICT: 1000 SEC: 96 BLOCK: 1 LOT: 19.1 1000 96 2 7 APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FT. I~E)iUS / ¥IC. INiTT/ ~E'Y MAP I"= 2OO'-O" ¢24x~6) 400' 600' 800' DESIGNu GROUP5 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732,888,6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 Lou Moglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ ~ ~ A113345 NY ~ # 0289924 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - ~ GE 36209 NY - # O75384 CT - ~ 22375 PA - # O61412 O5/18/I RE-ISSUED FOR FILINE O5/O~/I RE-ISSUED FOR FILINE I~ATE S~AL IlmetroPCSI Wireless for All. SlT~ ~o~. N'r'7514 *T~ ~o~. OqMPSTSOI4 SITE J NFOI~.MATION 2IS~ OOUNT'f t~OA~ 45 m-_~UTCHO~UF=, N'T" I I~ CO-LOCATION o5/I I/lO I , ZONING, INFOFRM TION MiN, LOT A~EA 40,000 SQ.FT FXISTIN~ 45,5bq S,F. No OHAN®E MIN. 1CT kNIDTH I00 FT. iS&l'/ PT, NO OHAN®F MIN. 1CT DEPTH lBO FT. 2&D.16 FT. NO ©HAN®E MIN. F~,ONT YA~,D SETDAOK IOO FT. 25&.4 FT, 210.q FT. 20 FT. IS,2 FT. -/0.2 FT. '"fiN. SIDE YArD SETBACK ONE TOTAL 40 FT. 145.5 FT. 180.-/ FT. MIN. P-EAR- YARD SETDAOK -~0 FT. I1.1 FT. ~) 54.7 FT. diN. LANDSCAPE AREA ~AX. LOT OOV~RAS~ 50~ 4D,IS~ 45.62~ XAX. 5UILOINS HEIGHT / $TO~I~S 55 FT. / 2 100.41 FT. - 108'-I1" - TO~ER EXTENSION ~XISTIN~ TO~E~ Il2'-&" - TOP OF ANTENNA A~ AS ~OLLOHS: ~AM. H~I~HT 80 FT. ~00.41~T,~ ~AX. ~UI~ENT AREA ~OO SC, FT. N/A B~O SQ. FT. ~y: ~ EXISTIN~ NON-~ONFO~NIT~ N/A NON APPLI6A~LE BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM THE :OLLOHIN& - A DRAHiNca TITLED "PROPERTY SURVEY" =REPARED FOR THE NTH DESIGN GROUP INC. ON JUN 4, 200q BY AREK SURVEYIN~ COMPANY NY LIC. OBO56q - SITE MEASURMENTS TAKEN BY THE MTM DESICN CROUP INC. AT SITE VISIT ON 04.1'/.Oq NOTES: iNSTALLATION IS IN COMPLIANCE PtlTH: -ALL LOCAL AND STATE BUILDIN6 CODED. -THE ENERGY CONSERVATION CONSTRUCTION CODE OF NYS. 142.B' SIDE YARD SETBACK (EXISTIN5 POLE TO PROPERTY LINE) TAX LOT #17,5 N/O/F TOWN OF SOUTHOLD °? GRAS LOCATION VERIZON EASEMENT RECORD-EXIBIT "A" V105786 128.b' SlOE YARD E (EXiSTIN5 EQUIPMENT TO PROPERTY LINE) IIO.B' SIDE YARD (PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO PROPER'PC TAX LOT #19.1 AREA: 45,589 Sq.F. 1.0465 Acres ~ o ASPHALT PA 105.15 KING PROPOSED METRO PCS EQUIPHENT CABINETS (TYP, OF 4) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO NE~ lB' x lb' CONCRETE SLAB IN lb' x 20' FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND (560 SQ PT LEASE AREA) 15.2' SlOE YARD SETBACK (EXISTING EQUIPMENT TO PROPERTT LINE) 1 STY METAL & FRAME DESIGNru GROUP z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 LouMoglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-~AI13345 NY-# 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ-~GE36209 NY-~ 075384 CT- # 22375 PA-~ O61412 SIDE YARD SETBACK o (EXISTIN~ POLE TO D, PROPERTy LINE) UNDER( WlREL #21855 1 STY METAL (AUTO SHOP) 70.2' SIDE YARD SETBACK (PROPOSED EQUIPiMENT 05/18,/I RE-ISSUED FOR FILIN6 )UND CABINETs TO CONDUIT % PROPERTy LINE) 05/0~/[RE-ISSUED FOR FILIN5 (RECORD-EXIBIT "A" V 06723) ~ EDOE )F Z ~A S P H A L T P A R K I N G 68.5' ce Ot~ I C O N C R E T E P A E M E N ~_ ~ ~ <_ TAX LOT ~20.1 oJ~ z ~ %~ ~ N/O/F CHRISTOPHER MOH~ ~ ~ ~ TTT. OD I z I~1 GRASS <m O I~=~< ' ~ G R A S S o ~ 705. $2'(ACTUAL) ROOF OVER ~b ~l 4.85'~ #22155 < 4CRETE FRAME [, __ FO~ TH[ EXCLUSIVE USE I5'T¢ THE TITLE ~LIDNT ANY' - ' IIm troPCSI E Wireless for All. I$ WOOD LILC0 II~ 5'NW~ UTILITY POLE UTILITY POLE ~#420 -- -- -- #421 47- S 25°52'30" W 168.17' MIDDLE 0 20' WIDE) ROAD (,NORTH ROAD) ELEC. coNDUiT (MARK-OUT) d:750' (DEED) SITE PLAN APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE t~-.OA~ 48 NY' I Iq~ COUNTY ~TM UO~*. Gq MPSTSOI 4 SITE OUTOHOCUIE~, DESIGN T'FPE: CO-LOCATION Pt,do 05/11/10 SHEET ZONIN® I N~=O~i".dAT I ON SHEET NUivlBEP-. CURB Ilxl'~ SCALE: I": 4¢'-¢" 24x5~ SCALE: 1":2¢'-~)" 40' 60' bO' pRoPOSED ANTENNA5 TO EXIBTIN® STRUCTURE PROPOSED HETRO PCS EQUIPH~NT CADIblETS (TYP. OF 4) HOUNTED ON P~OPOSED STEEL ~AIL5 ANtHO~EO TO NE~ B' x It' CONCRETE SLAB iN 18' x 20' FENGED E~UIPHENT COHPOUND (~60 5Q ET LEASE A~EA) 1 STY METAL & FRAME ! ! #22155 1 STY / / / ? / #218~55 1 STY METAL (AUTO SHOP) FRAME o, d~z- 703.32' d:750' .( S 25052'30" W 168.17' MIDDLE 0 20' w~q ROAD (c.R.-4a) (~oRm ROAD) O F~OPOSEE) EQUIIPIMENT OFFSETS SCALE: 24x~6 SCALE 01 40~ 60~ 80' DESIGN'u GROUP~z ARCHITECTUR ENGINEERING P. O. BOX3 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 LouMog~no, AIA ARCHITECT IN J-#Ail3345 NY-# 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ- ~GE 36209 NY-~ 075384 CT - # 22375 PA-# O61412 OB/18/ll ~E-ISSUED FOR FILINg, 05/OD/II FEE-ISSUED FOR FILIN® P~EVISION ImetroPCSI Wireless for All. ~T~ ao** OqNIPSTSOI4 ~UT~HO~UE2, Nh" I1~ SUFFOLK COUNTY GO-LOCATION SHEET PMo 05/11/10 REV. AL. I~-- PROPOSED ELECTRIC FROM EXISTING METER STACK NEXT TO AUTO BODY SHOP TO NEH COMPOUND (~= PROPOSED ¢aROUND RING (~= PROPOSED TELCO FROM EXISTING CBC CABINET TO NEH COMPOUND EXISTING 'v'ERIZON SHELTER EXISTING GABLE OTHERS (TYP.) EXISTING 100'-5" -- MONOPOLE TO BE ¢fODIFIED ACCORDIN®LY TO ACCQMODATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOADING. DRAldlN®S AND DETAILS ARE PROVIDED BY OTHERS FOR REFERENCE (SEE DETAIL I/Z-4) 250' SECTOR 50' ALPHA SECTOR EXISTING OSC CABINET EXISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) 150 BETA SECTOR PROPOSED i'4ETRO --I PCS CABLE BRIDGE ROUTED I OVER CORNER OF EXISTING T-MOBILE [ EQUIPMENT AREA SEE DETAIL I/Z-5) I =ROPOSED I LANDSCAPINCa SCREENING AROUND I METRO PCS FENCED EQUIPMENT L cOMPOUND, IO'+/- 41CH ARBORVITAE'S OR APPROVED EQUAL (SEE DETAIL 4/Z-4) PROPOSED METRO PCS CPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO CABLE EXISTING NEXTEL SHELTER ,.If EXISTING DOUBLE GATE EXISTING EQUIPFIENT (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS ('PCP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXTENSION ON PROPOSED T-ARM BRACKETS (SEE DETAIL ~/z-4) EXISTIN® EQUIP'dENT (BY OTHERS) EXISTING EQL ¢PIENT (BY OTHERS) - EXISTING UTILITIES EXISTING 4'-0" ®ATE (TYPICAL) EXI~TIN,~ 6'-c FENCE AITIH h Il PROPOSED METRO PCS 6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE YqlTH BARBED HIRE ~ PRIVACY SLATS 4ETRO PCS CPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO CABLE! BRID¢E SUPPORT PROPOSED i'4ETRO PCS EQUIPMENT (""CP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO NE!.1 CONCRETE SLAB CONCRETE 5LAB/!~8's ~20'-0" COMPOUND PROPOSED METRO PC5 DUAL LIGHT HITH MANUAL TIMER 5!~ilTCH )( )( PROPOSED 50UNO SEAL 50UND CURTAIN, !BBC-EXT-R-2 EXTERIOR NOISE BARRIER / SOUND ABSORBER COMIPOSITE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURER SPECifiCATION~- ON THE INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED t=ENClNIG, ALONG THE ONE 18' SIDE OF THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND. PROPOSED METRO PCS FTC CABINET SECURED TO PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB ON UNISTIRUT FRAME MOUNTED TO GALVANIZED POSTS .A,. ~ROPOSED METRO PCS CABLES F.')UTED d'¢ ALON~ NEY'I GABLE ... ~ID~F~ TO EXlSTIN~ MONOPOLE '~. ~ PROPOSED ~ET~O PCSj B'-O" x 16'-0' ~ CONO~ETE 5LA~3 ~ROPOSEP 18'-0" x 20~-0" EQUIPHENT COb. EXPANSION (~¢~' SQ FY) "- PROPOSED 4'-0" !~IDE GATE /- PROPOSED METRO PCS UNDER, ROUND UTILITY BRIDGE SUPPORT POST (TYPICAL OF 2) (SEE DETAIL 2/Z-5) PROPOSED METRO PC5 EQUIPMENT CABINET5 (TYP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL RAIL5 ANCHORED TO NEH IB'-O" x 18'-0" CONCRETE SLAB 0 PROPOSED SAFETY 51GNAGE AND CONTACT INFORMATION (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-5) PROPOSED METRO PC5 UNDEReROUND UTILITY CONDUIT ROUTED FROM EXISTIN~ METER STACK CONDUIT FROM HETER PROPOSED HE RO PCS UNDERcaROUND TELEPHONE CONDUIT FROi': EXISTIN® 050 TO PROFCSED FTC CABINET APPROVED BY DESIGNu GROUP z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 LouMoglino, AIA ARCHITECT -~AI13345 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEEE NJ-~GE36209 NY-# 075384 CT - # 22375 PA-# 061412 05/18/11 RE-ISSUED FOR FILING 05/03/11 RE-ISSUED FOR FILING ~EVISION DATE IDESCP-IPTION SEAL Wireless for All. si** uo**~ N'r'7514 XT~ Jo~*, OqMPSTSOI4 SITE INFOP--i~ATION OOUNT'r' ROAD 45 COUNTY EDES I C~h,t CO-LOCATION t~.Jo Pt'do SHEET TITLE PAt~.T I AL SITE ~ Ed~U I Pt'/fEENT SHEET NUMBER F A TIAL SITE pIAN E UIIF MEENT f LAN P NNING BOARD IIxH ~G~L~ I/4": I'-¢" TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IIxl~ SCALE: I":l~'-~" ~ 04x5~ SCALE:I/2":I'-¢" 24x3~ SCALE: 1":5'-¢" - DATE ~AR 1 4 2012 PLAN PLAN NOTE~ AN UPDATEI2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE EXISTIN~ MONOPOLE HAS COMPLETED ON APRIL 2q, 2011 BY THE ~PD ~ROUP (NY P.E. DAVID B. ~RANGER, LIC #0"11381-1). THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS HA5 PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE HtTH TIA-222-6 STANDARDS AND DETERMINED THE EXISTING STRUCTURE HILL NOT REQUIRE ANY MODIFICATIONS TO SUPPORT THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOADING. TOI. NER MODIFICATIONS AB OUTLINED IN A PREVIOUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT DATED AUGUST 18, 2010, COMPLETED BY ¢=PD GROUP, HAVE BEEN INSTALLED AND HERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE UPDATED ANALYSIS. PLEASE REFERENCE THE LATEST STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT FOR DETAILS. ~LL EXISTING EQUIPMENT I SHOHN FOR CLAR TY. PROPOSED METRO (TYP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, O TOTA~ MOUNTED TO PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXTENSION ON PROPOSED T-ARM BRACKETS PROPOSED 8'-0" MONOPOLE EXTENSION TO BE INSTALLED BY METRO PCS. BEE DRAHINSS BY 6PD ASSOCIATES, SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER TOP OF ToHER 21.15" DIA. EXISTING ANTENNAS OTHERS) (TYPICAL) _/ TOP OF PROP. METRO POS ANTENNAS 112'-0"± ABOVE ¢RADE CENTER OF PROP. METRO PCS ANTENNAS 110'-5"± ABOVE GRADE TOP OF PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXTENSION 108'-I1"~ ABOVE 6RAPE TOP OF EXISTING ANTENNAS IOO'-O"± ABOVE GRADE CENTER O?EXISTING ANTENNAS 104'-0" ABOVE GRADE TOP OF EXISTING MONOPOLE 100'-5"+_ ABOVE GRADE TOP OF EXISTING ANTENNAS q2'-II"± ABOVE GRADE CENTER OF EXISTING ANTENNAS qO'-II"± ABOVE GRADE TOP OF EXIBTIN® ANTENNAS / 85'~0"± ABOVE GRADE CENTER OF EXISTING ANTENNAS 02'-8"± ABOVE GRADE TOP OF EXISTING ANTENNIAG '7_-5 z AB~'VE ®RASE CENTER OF EXISTING ANTENNAS qO'-2"± ABOVE ®RA~E PROPOSED METRO PCB PTC CAIBINET MOUNTED TO UNISTRUT FRAME ON ~ALVANIZED POSTS !,qI'FH LIGHT ABOVE PROPOSED METRO PCS COAXIAL GABLES ROUTED UP OUTSIDE OF MONOPOLE TO ANTENNAE EXISTINO ID0'-5" MONOPOLE TO DE % MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY TO ~- ACCOMODATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOADIN®. DRADIINGS AND ~ETAIL5 ARE PROVIDED BY OTHER5 FOR REFERENCE (SEE DETAIL I/Z-4) TOP OF PROPOSED GPB ANTENNA 11'-0"::: ABOVE ~RADE TOP OF PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE q'-O"+ ABOVE GRADE TOP OF PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINETS "/'-2":1: ABOVE GRADE PR<OPOBED METRO PCS CPS UNiT MOIUNTED TO CABLE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST METRO PCS EQUIPMENT CAIBINETS (TYP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL RAILS AN(CHORES TO NEH 15' x 10' C01NCRETE SLAB IN 18' X 20' FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND EXPANSION (500 PRIOPOSED METRO PCS COAXIAL CA[FLEE ROUTED ALONG NEH CAiBLE BRIDGE TO EXISTING MO~NOPOLE ~EXIISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) METRO PCB 0'-0" HIGH CH~AIN LINK FENCE HITH BARBED HIRE ANID PRIVACY SLATS PROPOSED BOUND BEALBOUND CURTAIN, BBC-EXT-R-: EXTERIOR NOISE BARRIER/BOUND ABSORBERCOMPOSITE (ORAPPROVED EQUAL) TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS ON / THE iNSIDE OF THE PROPOSED FENCING, ALONG THE ONE 18' SIDE OF / THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND. PROPOSED METRO PCS UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONDUIT ROUTED FROM EXISTING METER 5TACK TO FTC CABINET (BEE ELECTRICAL DRA/qlNGS FOR DETAILS) PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SCREENING AROUND METRO PCS FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, I0%/- HIGH ARBORVITAE'S OR APPROVED EQUAL (BEE DETAIL 4/Z-4) ELEYATI©N SCALE 5/'4"=1 '-®" (11×1'1) SCALE I I/2" =1'-©" (22x.~4) 250' GAMMA SEOTOR ' G PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA: KATMREIN MODEL NO. 4'-0 I/4" B ~i IAlld bh 61/4" 2-12'' FRONT VIEW SlDE VIEW ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS SCALE~ l/2" = ]'-¢" SCALE I"--I'-0" 40' ALPHA SECTOR 150' BETA SECTOR ANTENNA Ot IENTATION SCALE: ~/4"=1'-®" (]lxlq2 SCAL~ I I/2"=1'-©" (22x54) PROPOSED I0'-0"+/- HIGH LANDBCAPIN~----.. SCREENING SET OF (3) STAKES HITH GUY~ HIRES BETHEEN I/2 AND 2/3 HAY UP TREE. 4" HIGH MULCH MOUND TO FORM SAUCER AROUND TREE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP I/3 OF ROOT BALL. ®RAPE NEH PLANT CRAPE FILL. SCARIFY 4" BELOH ROOT BALL RECOMPAOTED. STAKES TO EXTEND 18" BELOH TREE PIT IN UNDISTURBED GROUND. PROPOSED vALMONT TRI-BRACKET T-ARM ASSEME~LY BI823 (OR APPROVED EQUAL) MOUNTED TO PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXTENSION 2-3/~" O. D. ANTENNA MOUNIN5 PIPE PROPOSED METRO PCB ANTENNA (TYP OF 2 PER SECTOR, O TOTAL) MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-ARM BRACKETS (BEE 5/Z-4 FOR ANTENNA MOD~L g DIMENSIONS) Tt EE PLANTING DETAIL DESIGN'o GROUP z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 LouMog~no, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-~AI13345 NY-~ 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ-~E 36209 NY-~ 075384 CT- ~ 22375 PA -~ 061412 05/18/I RE-ISSUED FOR SEAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE (llxlq) SCALE: NOT TO SCALE (22x34) ...... E~ONSENT OP THE C, RBATOR 15 ~TRIC, TL'f PROHIDITBO I.:"APPROVED BY III I ._,..o.. IlrmetroPCS l TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Wireless for All. I *~ uo**: Oqlv[PST$OI4 SITE I N FOt~-,iVIATI O N COUNTY P-.CAP 45 OUTCHO®UE, NY I I~l~ CO-LOCATION t~Jo F>ivfo 05/I 1/10 SHEET TITLE ELEVATION 'I-"~'F-" T.~- I L~"%. ' SHEET NUh,IE~EP-. XU~ l 5 £.. PROPOSED METRO PCS GPS UNIT MOUNTED ON CABLE BRIDGE ~ PROPOSED VALMONT CABLE BRIDGE ASSEMBLY / OR APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDE SUPPORT POSTS @ 8'-0" ON CENTER MAXIMUM COAXIAL CABLES ROUTED ALONG CABLE BRIDGE GRATING ON TRAPEZE HANGERS 3 I/2"$ SCHEDULE 40 POST, AT 8'-0" MAXIMUM ON CENTER EXISTING SOIL 1'-4" DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING, USE BASE PLATE IdlTH DIA. ANCHORS FOR MOUNTING TO SLAB PROPOSED (2" T~.IICK LAYER S/4" [2IA, CRUSHED STONE ~ASE ( CASLE OldIE)GE DETAIL SCALE I/4"=1'-®" (llxl'f) SCALE I/2"=1'-0" (22x54) PROPOSED E~aUIPMENT CABINETS (2 EQUIPMENT ~ 2 BAI IERY OADINETS) ON STEEL FRAME MOUNTED TO CONCRETE PAD HORK LIGHT, RACO I BELL ~58B-S OR APPROVED EQUAL ON A PfANUAL TIMER PROPOSED METRO- PCS FTC CABINET ON UNISTRUT FRAME MOUNTED TO GALVANIZED POST HIT14 LIGHT ABOVE PROPOSED STEEL PRAHE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB (SEE DETAIL 2/Z-D) EQUIF~MENT I-I/4"¢ scl 40 x 18" L& MIN SS OR GALV. PIPE PLATE I/4 x 4-1/4 x 18-1/4" LC. GALV.(A'38) STD. U-BOLT FO~, 2"$ PIPE ,d/DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND/1AS14ER, GALV, STD. U-BOLT FOR 2"$ PIPE ~/DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND !,tAS14ER, GALV. (SEE NOTE S) CAL EQUIIPMENT ELE1/ TION SCALE: I/4"=1'-¢" (IMq,; SCALE I/2"=1'-0" (22x~4) MOUNTING~ BRACKET PLATE PROPOSED~ MOUNTING MAST ¢ROUND BAR 3,1 CPS UNIT .~1¢ ----TILT HOLES FOR ADJUSTHENT G GPS NTENN DETAIL SCALE: I/2"=1'-¢" (llxlq) SCALE I"=1'-O" (22x~4/ CABINET LEGEND Q~) PROPOSED LTE CAD[NET H 2'-I1 B/18" X P 3'-0" X H 3'-II -//8" (,~) PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET Id 2'-II 3/8" X P 3'-I 13/18" X t4 8'-3 11/16" (~ PROPOSED BATTERY CABINET ~ 2'-4 q/16" X P 2'-4 ~/4" X H 5'-q ~ PROPOSED BATTERY OABINET ~ 2'-4 q/18" X P Z-4 ~/4" X H ~'-~ ~/1~" PROPOSED 8" THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE SLAB HIT14 2 LAYERS OF 6x6-8/8 !,tELDEO HIRE FABRIC. SEE PLANS FOR PAD SIZE (TOP TO BE LIGHTLY BRUS14ED) PROPOSED CHAMFERED EDGE ~t APPROX FINISH GRADE 4" THICK LAYER OF 3/4" DIA. CRUSHED 5TONE BASE EXISTIN~ UNDISTURBED ~ VIRGIN SOIL ( CONCF ETE SL D DETAIL SCALE: ~/4"=1'-®" (llxll) SCALD I I/_ =1-© (2_x~4) _NOTE, I. SIGN SHALL BE HOUNTED ON EXTERIOR SIDE OF FACILITY DOOR. 2. MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE 5'-0" ABOVE SILL TO CENTERLINE OF SIGN. metroPCS Site NY7 314 Network Operation Center 24/7 acce88 Iine-1-866-672-6727 0 0 RADIO FREQUENCY ANTENA8 AT THIS SITE ~ PLEASE EXERCISE CAUTION AROUND ANTENNAS DO NOT STAND~ IN FRONT OF ANTENNASi L.°~°/ ~-~RED BACKGROUNE -ASTIC HHITE LETTERS ~ GRAPHICS HHITE BACKGROU:',O ~BLACK LETTERS APPROVED BY. PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOU) DESIGN.° ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX3 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 I Lou Moglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ - ~ A113345 NY - # 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ ' # GE 36209 NY - # 075384 CT - ¢¢ 22375 PA - # O61412 03/18/11 RE-ISSUED FOR FILING 05/03/11 RE-ISSUED FOR FILING ~ESCP-IPTION SEAL ImetroPCSI Wireless for All. ~T~ JO** OqNPSTSOI4 SITE INFOP-.MATION ~185B COUNTY P-.OA~ 48 CUTCHO®UE, N'~ I I~B5 SUFFOLK COUNTY CO-LOCATION f~4o SHEET TITLE ;QUIPMENT DATE. 05/I I/1© I::)ETAIL5 NUh'IBEFL SCALE: I 1,2"=1'-¢" (Il×lq) SCALE:3" = I'-~" SCALE ~"=1'-0" ('24×~) P-.EV. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Ch~ir WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MArLrNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 February 26, 2013 John Coughlin, Esq. 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re; Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, +/- 800' west of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: Light Industrial (LI) Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Planning Board, at their February 25, 2013 Work Session, found that the requirements of the above-referenced site plan and special exception have been completed based on the site inspection made February 20, 2013. The site is now in conformance with the Approved Site Plan, dated May 11, 2010, prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc., last revised May 18,2011. This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies; Planning Board approval is required prior to any significant changes to the site. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman CC: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 13, 2012 John Coughlin, Esq. c/o R6, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Approval: Special Exception for MetroPCS New York at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: Light Industrial Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, March 12, 2012: WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was accepted for review on November 22,2011, including a site plan prepared by MTM Design Group Inc., dated May 18, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the above-referenced request for a Special Exception for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2011, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town to assist in the review process; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2012, a public hearing was held and closed; and MetroPCS ~ Jun(~e PaRe Two March 13, 2012 WHEREAS, on February 23, 2012, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and had recommended the proposed project to be consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on February 27, 2012, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met; and WHEREAS, on February 27, 2012, the Southold Town Planning Board made a determination that the applicant has satisfied the requirements for a Special Exception pursuant to Town Code Section 280-142 based on the following: That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection; and WHEREAS, on February 27, 2012, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the application to determine whether it met the additional standards for a Special Exception Approval for a Wireless Communication Facility pursuant to §280-73B as follows: 1. Construction of the proposed facility or modification of the existing facility is a public necessity, in that it is required to meet current or expected demands of the telecommunications provider and to render adequate service to the public. 2. The applicant has made substantial effort to co-locate with existing wireless facilities, or, failing that, has made substantial effort to locate on municipally- owned land or structures, or within or on existing buildings or structures. 3. There are compelling reasons which make it more feasible to construct the proposed facilities rather than alternatives; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2012, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and certified that the proposed action is a permitted use in this Light Industrial Zoning District; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and, as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration; and be it further MetroPCS ~ Jun.qe Pa,qe Three March t3, 2012 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby finds and determines that the standards for Special Exception Approval have been met; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the action is consistent under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program as outlined in the memo prepared by the LWRP Coordinator; and be it further RESOLVED, that after deliberation of the application and consideration of the above factors, the Southold Town Planning Board grants a Special Exception for the Wireless Co-location Facility as shown in the site plan application for "MetroPCS Co- location", prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc., dated May 3, 2011, and last revised May 18, 2011. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to Special Exceptions: 1. Any Special Exception Approval granted under this article shall have a term of five years, commencing from the granting of the Special Exception, which may be extended for an additional five-year term upon application to the Planning Board. 2. On a renewal application, the applicant shall demonstrate that the wireless communication facility is in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and with all of the conditions of the Special Exception Approval and site plan, that the facility is necessary to provide adequate service, and that there is no reasonable alternative available to the owner which will provide adequate service without the continuing use of the facility. 3. Subsequent Special Exception renewals shall be subject to review by the Planning Board and subject to such standards that shall be included in the Town Code at that point in time. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Chairman Encl. cc: Town Engineer Building Dept. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSI~I Chair WILL/AM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significance March 12, 2012 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southald, NY11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Name of Action: SCTM#: Location: SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Description of Action: This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. MetroPCS, New York at Junge 1000-96-1-19.1 21855 CR 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue Unlisted (X) Yes ( ) No (X) This application is for proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The proposed action requires Special Exception Approval from the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to Section 280-70(E) of the Southold Town Code. SEQR Ne,qative Declaration - Pa.qe Two - March 12, 2012 The property is currently improved with a 100'.5" monopole and equipment area within a fenced compound (see photo below). The property is zoned Light Industrial (LI). Zoning districts located within the vicinity of the parcel include LI (Limited Business) to the north (town landfill), R-40 (Residential) immediately to the west and AC (Agricultural Conservation) to the south. Figure 1. Subject pamel (black arrow) with zoning boundary lines. The land use on site is Light Industrial (motor vehicle repair) and private utility. Surrounding land uses within the vicinity of the site are residential and commemial. Based on the existing use and improved facilities, the proposed action will not cause a substantial intensification of use over the current use. Further, the proposed action will not cause significant impacts to agricultural, open space or recreational resources. No substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise level will occur as a result of the proposed action. The tower is visible from County Route 48 and New York State Route 25, New York State Scenic Byways and secondary roads. A Visual Analysis (dated May 4, 2010), prepared by EBI Consulting, has been submitted. Based upon the analysis, the proposed action will not result in a significant impact to the existing view. Therefore, the Planning Board has determined that the 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on the existing 100'.5" monopole will SEQR Ne,qative Declaration - Pa.qe Three- March 12, 2012 not result in significant impacts to the view sheds important to the community. Equipment cabinets will be located in a fenced compound and screened with 18 evergreen trees 10 feet in height. No exterior lighting is proposed. Further, no major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy will occur. The applicant has submitted an assessment of Radio Frequency (RF) Compliance entitled Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report (June 30, 2011 ). The report concluded that the radio frequency emissions from the combination of the existing and proposed antenna to be in compliance with FCC Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Therefore, no known creation of a hazard to human health is expected to occur as a result of the proposed action. The site is cleared and improved, therefore, the proposed action will not result in the significant removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation. No impact to soils is proposed. The New York Department of Environmental Conversation in a 2009 policy memorandum entitled Guidelines for Consultation with NY Natural Heritage regarding Proposed Co-locations of Telecommunication Facilities on Existing Towers and Buildings (2009) has determined that proposed actions involving the co-location of new equipment on an existing structure (tower) are not likely to adversely affect Federally- listed species in New York, nor have any significant impacts on migratory birds or other trust resources. However, an Osprey nest (Species of Special Concern) has been constructed on the monopole in the top antennae array. Ospreys are migratory and use nests between March and October. This nest has been active in past years. The NYSDEC was contacted to determine protocols for nest removal. If there are no birds present prior to March 31st' the nest can be removed. If the nest is to be removed after March 31st' a Migratory Bird Depredation Permit from USFWS is required: Link http:/Iwww.aphis.usda..qov/ws/ca/newslusfws mi.qratory bird depredation permit.pdf. Construction is not permitted once the birds return. It is recommended that due to the safety issues the nest poses to the antennae array, it is recommended that the nest be removed prior to March 31. Interference with a migratory wildlife species will occur if the action is implemented as planned. An Osprey nest will be removed from the antennae array of the monopole. This, however, would affect the Osprey on site and will not result in a significant impact to the species local population. No significant impacts to a significant habitat area will occur, The site is improved, therefore, the action would not result in adverse impacts to cultural/historic resources. Similarly, the proposed action will not impair the character or quality of important historical or architectural resources. The site is currently improved and the proposed action will not result in significant adverse impacts to aesthetic resources or to existing community or neighborhood SEQR Ne,qative Declaration - Pa,qe Four- March 12, 2012 character or result in a material conflict with the community current plans or goals as officially approved. Based upon such, no significant adverse impacts to the environment are expected to occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Southold Town Planning Board 631-765-1938 cc: Town Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. W1LCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 13,2012 John Coughlin, Esq. c/o R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Approval: Amended Site Plan for MetropCS New York at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: Light Industrial Dear Mr. Coughlin: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on March 12, 2012: WHEREAS, this amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted an application for site plan review and special exception review on August 15, 2011; and WHEREAS, at a Work Session on November 22, 2011, the Planning Board accepted the application for review; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2012, a public hearing was held and closed by the Planning Board for the above-referenced site plan; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2012, the Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to the required agencies for their comments; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2012, the Cutchogue Fire District determined there was adequate fire protection and emergency access for the site; and MetroPCS ~ Jun.qe PaRe Two March 13, 2012 WHEREAS, on February 23, 2012, the Suffolk County Planning Commission deemed the site plan application a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s); and WHEREAS, on February 23, 2012, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and has recommended the proposed project be found consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on February 27, 2012, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the above- referenced application and has determined the project to provide adequate drainage and the proposed drainage meets the minimum requirements of Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, at a Work Session held on February 27, 2012, the Planning Board found that all applicable requirements of the Site Plan Regulations Article XXlV, §280 - Site Plan Approval of the Town of Southold have been met; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, in their Special Exception Approval resolution on March 12, 2012, and pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, granted a Negative Declaration for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2012, the Southold Town Chief Building Inspector reviewed and certified the proposed amended site plan as a permitted use in the A-C Zoning District; and WHEREAS, at their public meeting on March 12, 2012, the Planning Board granted approval to the Special Exception application for this site; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is consistent with the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval with a Condition to the amended site plan entitled "MetroPCS Co-location", prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc., on May 3, 2011, last revised on May 18, 2011, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the site plan, including the following six plans: 1. T-1 Title Sheet 2. Z-1 Vicinity Plan 3. Z-2 Site Plan and Zoning Information 4. Z-2A Proposed Equipment Setbacks 5. Z-3 Partial Site Plan and Equipment Plan 6. Z-4 Monopole Elevation and Details MetroPCS ~ Jun(~e Pa,qe Three March 13, 2012 The condition is as follows: Prior to a building permit being issued, ensure the osprey nest located on top of the existing monopole is removed in accordance with all state and federal requirements. Please note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved Site Plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the Approved Site Plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the Approved Site Plan, and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the Approved Site Plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. A copy of the Approved Site Plan is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, DJ" D~?onald j~,~/~ Chairman Encl. CC: Building Dept. w/map Town Engineer w/map PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chah- WILLIAM J. CREMEHS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M_AH.ING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 F~x: 631 765;3136 Mamh 28, 2013 John J..Coughlin, Esq. R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington NY 11743 Re: Site Plan Application for Metro PCS New York, LLC located at Junge, 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM#1000,96-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $5,450 for the balance of the funds provided by your client to the Town to cover the expense of a consultant to assist With,the review of the application referenced above. Your client sent an initial amount of $8,500. The consultant, Center for Municipal Solutions, subsequently billed a total of $3,050 (see enclosed copies of Invoices //96911-001, 96911-002, 96911-003 and 96911-004). Pursuant to Town Code §280-74A(4)(c) we are returning the unused portion of the funds to you. Sincerely, Donald Wilcanski Planning Board Chair LR Encs. RESOLUTION 2013-242 ADOPTED DOC ID: 8657 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 2013-242 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON MARCH 26, 2013: Resolved, that unused consulting fees paid to the Town in connection with the wireless consulting review of MetroPCS at Jnnge, 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue, SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1, totaling $5,450.00 be refunded to the applicant, MetroPCS New York, LLC. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUSI MOVER: Louisa P. Evans, Justice SECONDER: Christopher Talbot, Councilman AYES: Dinizio Jr, Ruland, Doherty, Talbot, Evans, Russell WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, February 25, 2013 2:30 p.m. Executive Board Room, Town Hall Annex Applications: Location: 21855 CR 48 Cutchogue , ,, De~C~iptioni Tlii~ ~n~ ~it~ pi~ iS ~o~ p0 communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" ~onop~ and ~!I m!~ ~as~ e.q~p~ i~ a..~Z0~g ~s~[ict- ~tatu~; ~ ~PPr0W~ S~te ~lp~ ~cfion; ~ Rev!e~ co~men~ ~ro~ Attachments: Draft LeEe[ Locat on 39750 CR 48 Southold , . ~ along with the enclosure of an existing 56' x 50'6" area that currently operates as a paved outdoor crushing area and the addition of a 23'6" x 50'6" covered crushing pad, all for employee access only, to the existing tasting room site of Sparkling Pointe Winery on a 12.088 acre parcel in the. A:~ Zoning Dist,!ct: Action: iReview commen~s ~mm E.na! !nspection~ Attachments: := Draft Letter Description: This site plan application is for a 46' x 120' warehouse, for employee use only, with a 16' x 18' accessory office and bathroom on a 1.002 acre parcel in a Light Industrial Zoning District on Old North Road, Southold. , ~U[ Parking sta!!~ a~e.P~oPo~e~ an~ an ~Pha!~ ~rivev~aY: ~t~i :: Approve~ Site Plan Actiom i Rev!ew co~nt~, fro~ [ina! !n~pect!o~: j Atta~h.m.entsl ~[aft I-ette[ Project Name: G.W. Meade Farm SCTM#: 1000-69-5-7.1 Location: 1~'7~ ~ck~[!y ~oncl L~n~, ~t!'!o.!c! Description: This site plan is for the proposed construction of a 5,200 s.f. horse barn connecting to a 14,400 s.f. indoor arena for the keeping/breeding/raising and training of horses and a riding academy with 10 parking spaces. Aisc on the property are a 1,140 s.f. single-family dwelling, a 1,965 s.f. frame = barn and a 700 s.f. frame building on 10.004 acres in the A-C Zoning . District. Status: Actiom i Review rev sad s te P an Attachments: staff Report Planning ~oard Site Inspectio~n Record Pr°jectName ff)¢~>~)~---~'~- TaxMap# q/oWl-/q.I Aaending: ~ eu~ose oSsite visit: ~ ~ ~~q Notes: MS4 Reporting Illicit discharge on or near site? If Yes, briefly describe: (provide copy of this report to Town Stormwater Manager) ResendO1-28-13;OS:33PM; # ~/ 1 COMCIELL I-ONSTRUCTION CORP. January28, 2013 Town of Southold Planning Department Southold, NY Attn: Brian Cummings RE: Metro PCS Site NY73~.4 SCTM #473889 SEC/BLOCK/LOT #96-1-19fJ. Dear Brian: Please do a final inspection at above referenced site for Metro PCS. We are the general contractor for Metro and need to obtain the C of 0 to close out the site. If you need anything further please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you, (651) 654-5915 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 13, 2012 John Coughlin, Esq. c/o Rd, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Approval: Amended Site Plan for MetroPCS New York at J [~nge Located at 21855 CR 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: Light Industrial Dear Mr. Coughlin: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the $outhold Town Planning Board on March 12, 2012: WHEREAS, this amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted an application for site plan review and special exception review on August 15, 2011; and , WHEREAS, at a Work Session on November 22,2011, the Planning Board accepted the application for review; and WHEREAS, on Janua[y 9, 2012, a public hearing was held and closed by the Planning Board for the above-referenced site plan; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2012, the Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code {}280-131 C., distributed the application to the required agencies for their comments; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2012, the Cutchogue Fire District determined there was adequate fire protection and emergency access for the site; and PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 5, 2012 John Coughlin, Esq. c/o R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge 21855 C.R. 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: I am writing as a follow-up to the Work Session held on February 27, 2012 where the Planning Board discussed the above-referenced site plan. Comments from staff and outside agencies were reviewed and the Planning Board decided that no revisions are necessary. Please note that the above-referenced proposed colocation is scheduled for determination at the Planning Board's March 12, 2012 public meeting at 4:30pm in the Town Meeting Hall. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Bdan A. Cummings Planner WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, February 27, 2012 2:30 p.m. Executive Board Room, Town Hall Annex Applications: Location: i 3425 Soundview Ave., Peconic Description: This proposed lot line change will transfer 11,578 sq. ft. from Parcel B to ' Parcel A. Parcel A will increase in size from 377,613 sq. ft. (8.6 acres) to 389,191 sq. ft. (8.9 acres). Parcel B will decrease in size from 164,878 i sq.~.ff' (3'.~cres)..to !53 300 sg. ff. (3.~ ~.c[e~)~ R:80 Zoning District- Status: Open Location: i 415 Elijah's ~e, M~ttjtu~k ' ~ip{i~r{i This site plan is for a proposed 10 ft. pole extension to co-locate a ~ wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 108 ft. monopole, and install related base equipment in an LB Status: New ~iio~'i ~ Review for completeness. Location: 2!855 CR 48 Cutch0gue .............. Description: :: This amended site plan is for a MetroPCS wireless co-location of = antennas on an existing 100'5" monopole with a proposed pole extension ~i heig.t~t.0f 8'6'' in the L Zon strct Status: . j Action: Review comments from referrals. Project name: De Art of Nature, LLC SCTM# i 1000-84-1-10 4 Locat on 23423 CR 48 Cutchogue Description: ~ This site plan is for a proposed 17,888 s.f. addition to an existing 37,183 s.f. glass greenhouse structure and two (2) new office trailers @ 720 s.f. each 0n a 5.8 acr~ p~r~! !n.the A:(~ Z~ni~] Distri0t Status.i New App!icP~!0n Action: . Review for complete[!e~s review ZBA comments. Attachments Draft Commen~ S~aff.Rep0rt SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)-765-9015 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.~ ENGINEER ~ ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 JAMIE.RIC HTER~TOWN.SO UTHOLD.N Y.US OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 February 27,2012 Re: Amended Site Plan for Metro PCS @ Junge Co-Location Wireless Facility SCTM #: 1000-96-01-19.1 Dear Mr. Wilcenski: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed a Site Plan, dated 5/11/10 with a revision date of 5/18/11, for the above referenced project. This Site Plan has been prepared by the office of MTM Design Group, Inc. for the installation of an 8'-6" monopole extension with six (6) panel antennas's to be installed on an existing monopole structure. Please consider the following: The proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will not be greater than 5,000 SF. As designed, the proposed upgrade to the existing cellular communications equipment will not create a significant increase in storm water quantities that will be generated at the site. In addition, the existing site drainage system currently meets the minimum requirements for Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management. Therefore, at this time, additional site drainage is not required. The planning board should require a structural design certification for all additional antenna or related equipment that will be attached to the existing tower. The Site Plan drawings indicate that a Structural Design Analysis has been performed. A copy of this report should be submitted for the Planning Board Files. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 M~JLING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Donald Wilcenski, Chair Town of Southold Planning Board From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: February 23, 2012 Re; MetroPCS, New York, Junge SCTM# 1000-96.-1-19.1 This application is for an amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co- locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Brian Cummings, Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Char WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southald, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: CC: From: Date: Re: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town Attorney Brian Cummings, Planner.~ February10,2012 Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, +_800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96 -1-19.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and a determination of jurisdiction, if applicable. This amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue. Thank you for your cooperation. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To.' From: Date: Re: Damon Rallis, Code Enforcement Officer Robert Fisher, Fire Marshall Brian Cummings, Planner.~c~ February 10, 2012 Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and any violations on record, if applicable. This amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District. Thank you for your cooperation, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. W[LCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Brian Cummings, Planner ~ February 16, 2012 Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, +890' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000 -96-1-19.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. The file is available at your convenience. This amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue. Thank you for your cooperation. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector Brian Cummings, Planner ~ February 10, 2012 Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. This amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue. Thank you for your cooperation. Encls: Site Plan Application Site Plan PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSICI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 F~Lx: 631 765-3136 February 10, 2012 Mr. Matthew Martin c/o Cutchogue Fire District 260 New Suffolk Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Request for Review On: Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Martin: The enclosed site plan application is being referred to you for your comment on matters of interest to the fire department, including fire department equipment access, emergency services, and any other issue that may be of concern or relevance to this application. Please respond with your recommendations at your earliest convenience. This amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue. Please contact me at (631)765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Brian A. Cummings Planner Encls.: Site Plan Application Site Plan Building Specifications PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: James Richter, Engineering Inspector From: Brian Cummings, Planner~c~ Date: February 10, 2012 Re: Amended Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge Co-location Wireless Facility Application Name: MetroPCS @ Junge Tax Map Number: 1000-96-1-19.1 Location: 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map Preliminary Subdivision Map Final Subdivision Map (Dated: ) (Dated: ) (Dated: ) Road Profiles Grading and Drainage Plans Other (Dated: (Dated: (Dated: Site Plan (Dated:May 18, 2011) Revised Site Plan (Dated: Grading and Drainage Plans Other (AS BUILT) (Dated: (Dated: Project Description: This amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue. Additional Comments: Comments are appreciated by February 22, 2012. Thank you for your cooperation. (518)439-3079 THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE DRIVE GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX (518)478-0909 February 3, 2012 (via email and regular mail) Chairman Sidor and Planning Board Members Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, MY 11971 MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for a proposed wireless telecommunication facility Premises - 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Dear Chairman Sidor and Members of the Planning Board Members: As requested, we have reviewed the application materials submitted for the above referenced facility with cover letter dated August 12,2011. We have also reviewed the supplemental application material (Planner's Report dated November 2011 & Appraisal Consulting Report dated January 9, 2012). Upon review of all application material submitted, and with further discussions we offer the following comments: Pursuant to Town Code Article XVII, Section 280, wireless telecommunications facilities within the Town of Southold, NY, require a Special Exception Permit and Site Plan Approval. Here, the applicant proposes to install a wireless telecommunications facility by co-locating on the existing monopole located at 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY. The applicant proposes to install an 8'6" extension to the existing 100'5" (AGL) monopole and attach three (3) antenna sectors with two (2) antennas per sector to the extension, thereby increasing the actual height of the overall structure to a height of 112'6" (AGL). The associated equipment cabinets and related cables and hardware are proposed to be located within a secured screened equipment compound at the base of the structure. We find the Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report dated June 30, 2011 to be complete. We agree with the report that "the antenna emissions at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RE exposure." It should be noted that this report should be revised if the antenna model or height should change. Upon further review of the signal propagation maps it appears that to locate below 80 fi. on the tower would reduce the applicant's service area in some spots by as much as one mile. Although we believe there may be available height above 80 fi., the data provided confirms the need for a facility at this location and would provide the best coverage available for the applicant. As such, the proposed extension is justified and would not be significant. In light of the foregoing, the proposed extension does not impose a significant impact and this structure can accommodate a new wireless telecommunications facility at this location. As such, we believe that the application material as provided is complete and this matter should be added to your next available agenda. If you require anything further please give me a call at (518)439-3079. Sincerely, CMS CC; Martin Finnegan (via e-mail) Heather Lanza (via email) Brian Cummings (via email) Al Tagliaferri (via e-mail) APPRAISAL CONSULTING REPORT MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Location: Existing Monopole 21855 Middle Raod (C.R. 48) Cutchogue, New York 11935 Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000/96/1/19.1 DATE OF HEARING January 9, 2012 PREPARED FOR Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 PREPARED BY Mr. Michael Lynch LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. 15 Dewey Street Huntington, New York 11743 (631) 427-1000 LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS 15 DEWEY STREET HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (631) 427-1000 January 9, 2012 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall 53095 Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Appraisal Consulting Report MetroPCS Site #NY 7314 Proposed Wireless Communications Facility: Existing Monopole - 21855 Middle Road (C.R. 48) Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Board Members: Date of Report: Oct. 6, 2011 In accordance with a request from MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS"), I have inspected the above site and prepared an Appraisal Consulting Report (the "Report") regarding potential effects of a proposed wireless communications facility (the "Communications Facility") on the surrounding community. This report is intended to comply with the report requirements set forth under Standards Rule 5-2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), subject to limiting conditions and a certification as outlined in the Addendum. After considering the location, market conditions, proposed build, and all other factors that influence value, it is my professional opinion that MetroPCS' proposed Communications Facility will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area and will not have any adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. My conclusions are outlined in the following Report. Respectfully submitted, LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. By: Michael J. Lynch N.Y.S. Cert. General R.E. Appraiser #46000001012 Purpose and Intended Use of Report The purpose and intended use of the Report is to study any possible adverse effects a proposed Communications Facility will have on the surrounding community. This Report is strictly prepared at the request of MetroPCS to present to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for a hearing to be held on January 9, 2012. Effective Date of Report The effective date of the Report is October 6, 2011, the date of inspection by Mr. Michael J. Lynch. Description of Proposed Cor~nunications Facility MetroPCS' proposed Communications without limitation, the installation of (the "Antennas") to an existing 100'5" "Monopole"). The Antennas will be affixed on the Monopole that will raise the height 108'11" (AGL). The height to the top of Facility consists of, six (6) panel antennas (AGL) monopole (the to an 8'6" extension of said structure to the Antennas will be 112'6" (AGL). There will also be associated equipment cabinetry set on steel rails and anchored to a 13' x 16' concrete slab within a fenced compound (the "Compound"). The Compound will be just southwest of the Monopole, adjacent to other equipment compounds and shelters associated with said structure. In addition, MetroPCS will screen the exposed perimeter of the compound with 10' high evergreen trees. The Monopole, which was originally erected close to two decades ago, currently houses all of the major wireless carriers, including AT&T, Verizon, T- Mobile, and Sprint-Nextel. 3 Description of Property and Surrounding Neighborhood The Communication Facility site will be at the north- westerly corner of the subject property (the "Property"), which is also improved with an auto repair shop, situated along the northwesterly side of Middle Road (County Road 48, a 4-lane divided highway), 750' southerly of Cox's Lane. It is also known and designated by Suffolk County Tax Map Number: District 1000, Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1. The Property contains a total site area of 1.05± acres and is situated within a Light Industrial (LI) zoning district. Adjoining parcels include a Town of Southold recycling center and former landfill to the northwest, a landscaping/masonry contracting yard and office to the north, and a single-family dwelling to the southwest. Across Middle Road to the southeast is a vacant and wooded, municipally owned parcel as well as farmland ("Duckwalk Vineyards") that are all zoned Agricultural Conservation (A-C). Nearby are a multi- tenanted industrial strip center ("North Road Commons"), a sand & gravel operation, and a small frame church. Scope of the Report In preparing this Report, the appraiser: Inspected the Property and surrounding community; Reviewed the engineering drawings as supplied by MTM Design Group, Inc.; Reviewed Suffolk County and Town of Southold assessment, tax map, and zoning records; Researched sales trends in the area of the Property in addition to comparable sites throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties; Prepared this Report in conformance with USPAP requirements. 4 Report Methodology In analyzing any potential adverse effect the Communications Facility may have on the surrounding community, the appraiser considered the proposed build of the Communications Facility to an existing Monopole, the surrounding neighborhood and land uses, zoning classification of the subject Property and surrounding parcels, and other existing conditions. In addition, we have reviewed and carried out studies with respect to wireless communications facilities in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, including the East End of Long Island. These communications facilities include monopole sites, lattice and guyed wire tower sites, rooftop mounted sites, and water tank sites. One of those studies of note is as follows: Monopole Antenna Site~ Keyspan Operations Center, Montauk Highway, Bridqehampton, New York. A 120'± monopole was erected at this center circa September 2000. This property is surrounded by residential properties to its north, east and west, and opposite agricultural land to its south. Nearby, at the southwest corner of Montauk Highway and Newlight Lane, is a community of upper- middle priced homes that was first developed in the mid 1980s. This development is partially within view of the monopole due to the open agricultural fields to the east. Our staff compared sales and after the installation date of the monopole. data, which included six (6) sales running from 4/97 compared with "after" data, which included six (6 from 2/01 to 5/04. data of homes in the development before Our "before" to 5/99, was sales running 5 The average price per home in the before and after groups was 128% higher for the latter ($516,167 vs. $1,179,000), which breaks down to an average of 29%/year market appreciation. This figure compares favorably with the overall market appreciation of 22%/year tabulated from all single-family homes sales over the same time period for all of Bridgehampton. As such, the antennas or monopole did not appear to lead to a devaluation of nearby property values around the site. Conclusions In summary, we offer the following conclusions: The proposed Communication Facility is appropriate for the Property given that the application involves the addition of Antennas to an existing Monopole, one that has housed communications facilities by other carriers for close to two decades. The Property is well suited for the Communications Facility, given existing conditions, land uses, and zoning in the surrounding neighborhood. No correlation was found between the presence of wireless communication facilities and declining property values in the studies we reviewed or carried out on co~unities in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, including the East End of Long Island. The proposed MetroPCS Communications Facility, therefore, will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area and will not have any adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. 6 ADDENDA PHOTOGRAPHS EXISTING CONDITIONS Photo 1: Existing View of Monopole Photo 2: Existing Ground Equipment, Shelters, Etc. Photo 3= Rear View of Auto Repair Shop on Subject Property 10 Photo 4: View of Property and Monopole Looking West from Middle Road (CR 48) Photo 5: View of Adjacent Landscaping Contracting Business to North of Property 11 Photo 6: View of Adjacent Residence to South of Property along Middle Road Photo 7: View of Adjacent To~rn Transfer Station to West of Property, Looking South from Cox Lane 12 Photo 8: View Looking East of Town-owned wooded Land Opposite Property along Middle Road Photo 9: View of Duckwalk Vineyards Just East of Property along Middle Road 13 Photo 10: View of North Road Commons Just North of Property along Middle Road Photo 11: View of Middle Road (C~R~ 48) Looking North 14 Photo 12: Birdseye View of Subject Property and Surrounding Neighborhood Looking North 15 TAX MAP, ZONING MAP, & ENGINEERING DRAWINGS l? Sou~ho~d Zon~.ng , . DESIGN.~ ~ ~ ,~f.~'~_~__~ G lq_ 0 U P- I DESIGN~ GROUP- Certification Assumptions & Limiting Conditions & Qualifications of the Appraiser 22 23 CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1. the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4. I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5. my engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6. my compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7. my analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8. I made a personal inspection of the property on October 6, 2011 that is the subject of this report. 9. no one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. Michael J. Lynch 24 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal report has been made with the following general assumptions: 1. No responsibility is assumed for the legal description or for matters including legal or title considerations. Title to the property is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated. 2. The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. 3. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed. 4. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no warranty is given for its accuracy. 5. All engineering is assumed to be correct. The plot plans and illustrative material in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property. 6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them. 7. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. 8. If the site is improved with a dwelling built prior to 1978, lead paint may be present and should be checked by an expert as per Title X, the Federal Disclosure law regarding lead hazards. 9. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless a nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. 10. It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report is based. 11. It is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in the report. 26 MICHAEL J. LYNCH Certified N.Y.S. General Real Estate Appraiser #46-1012 QUALIFICATIONS Real estate appraiser since 1981. President of Lynch Appraisal Ltd., located at 15 Dewey Street, Huntington, New York 11743. Appraised various types of real property on Long Island, New York City and Westchester County including multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, commercial property, factories, warehouses, R & D buildings, office buildings, large residential estates, residential and commercial subdivisions, boat yards, and special-use properties. Prepared appraisals for use in estates, estate planning, feasibility studies, condemnation proceedings, tax certiorari, and matrimonial matters. Specialized in testimony such as area or use variances for properties. Applications have included proposed wireless communications sites, fast food establishments, convalescent homes, service stations, multi-family residences, new construction, etc. Appeared as Expert Witness: Nassau County Supreme Court. New York Supreme Court. Town of Babylon Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Babylon Planning Board. Town of Babylon Town Board. Town of Brookhaven Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Brookhaven Town Board. Town of Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Huntington Planning Board. Town of Huntington Town Board. Town of Islip Town Board. Town of Islip Planning Board. Town of Riverhead Planning Board. Town of Riverhead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Smithtown Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Smithtown Town Board. Town of Southampton Planning Board. Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Oyster Bay Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Oyster Bay Town Board. Town of North Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Hempstead Town Board. Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Bayville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Brookville Board of Zoning Appeals. 27 Appeared as Expert Witness (cont.): Village of Cedarhurst Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of East Hills Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of East Rockaway Board of Appeals. Village of Farmingdale Board of Trustees. Village of Farmingdale Planning Board. Village of Floral Park Board of Trustees. Village of Freeport Planning Board. Village of Freeport Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Garden City Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Garden City Board of Trustees. Village of Garden City Planning Commission. Village of Great Neck Plaza Board of Trustees. Village of Great Neck Estates Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Hempstead Personal Wireless Services Facilities Review Board. Village of LaRingtown Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lawrence Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lynbrook Board of Trustees. Village of Malverue Board of Trustees. Village of Massapequa Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Matinecock Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Mill Neck Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Mineola Board of Trustees. Village of Munsey Park Board of Trustees. Village of New Hyde Park Board of Trustees. Village of New Hyde Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of North Hills Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Muttontown Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Old Brookville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Old Westbury Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Oyster Bay Cove Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Oyster Bay Cove Board of Trustees. Village of Oyster Bay Cove Planning Board. Village of Port Washington North Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Rockville Centre Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Roslyn Board of Trustees. Village of Roslyn Harbor Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Sea Cliff Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Upper Brookville Board of Trustees. Village of Upper Brookville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Valley Stream Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Westbury Board of Trustees. Village of Westbury Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Williston Park Board of Trustees. Village of Williston Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Asharoken Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Huntington Bay Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Islandia Board of Trustees. Village of Lloyd Harbor Board of Trustees. Village of Lloyd Harbor Planning Board. Village of Lloyd Harbor Zoning Board of Appeals. 28 Appeared as Expert Witness (cont.): Village of Northport Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Northport Board of Amhitectural & Historic Review. Village of East Hampton Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lindenhurst Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lake Grove Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Bellport Board of Trustees. Village of Patchogue Planning Board. Village of Port Jefferson Board of Trustees. Village of Quogue Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of The Branch Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Head of the Harbor Board of Trustees. Village of Westhampton Beach Board of Trustees. City of Glen Cove Planning Board. City of Glen Cove Zoning Board of Appeals. City of Long Beach Zoning Board of Appeals. EDUCATION Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York: BBA - Management (1983); MBA - Banking & Finance (1991). TECHNICAL TRAINING Appraisal Institute Real Estate Appraisal Principles - Exam #1A-1. Basic Valuation Procedures - Exam glA-2. Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part A, - Exam glB-A. Capitalization Theory and Tech. Part B, - successfully challenged Exam glB-B. Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation - successfully challenged Exam//2-1. Standards of Professional Practice, Pan A (USPAP) - Exam gi410 Standards of Professional Practice, Pa~t B - Exam gII420 Proposed metroPCS Telecommunications Facility Located at: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Cutchogue CDP, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, Long Island, NY November 2011 JAN 10 2012 Prepared by David Karlebach, PP, PC 38 E. Ridgewood Avenue #396 Ridgewood, NJ 07450 David Karlebach, AICP, PP Introduction The purpose of this planning study is to assess the existing character and visual quality of the area surrounding the Project Site, and examine any potential adverse visual impacts that may occur. A conclusion is offered concerning the impacts on the character of the neighborhood or on the environmental conditions of the area. Existing Land Use The Project Site is located on a nearly rectangular 1.05-acre tract of land identified as Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 as shown on the Town of Southold tax assessment maps. The Project Site is located along County Road 48 (Middle Road) in Cutchogue, approximately 3,000 feet north of the old Cutchogue Station. Access to the site is achieved via County Road 48. The site is improved with a one-story metal building with associated parking and utilities. The building is occupied by All Star Auto Repairs. Used auto sales also occur on the property. A 100'-5" foot-high steel monopole containing four tiers of communication antennas is located at the rear of the lot. This is significant because the uses on the site will not change as a result of the proposed development. The site will continue function as both a commercial use and a public utility use if the development approvals are granted. At the base of the communications tower are associated radio equipment cabinets within a fenced compound. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding area is primarily developed with landscape nurseries, greenhouses, vineyards, and other agricultural uses. There is a paucity of residential development to the south. Abutting the subject property to the west is the Town of Southold Solid Waste Management District. The Town of Southold maintains a transfer station to accept household and commercial garbage and recyclables, along with a yard waste compost facility that accepts leaves and brush for disposal. They are located adjacent to the old Town Landfill, which is now capped and closed. Immediately north of the site is North Road Commons, a neighborhood-type shopping center located at the intersection of Middle Road and North Road. Other than the existing monopole on the subject property, there are no other structures of sufficient height in the immediate area on which to mount antennas. The area is dominated by one and two-story buildings and farm fields. Project Description The applicant proposes to install a metroPCS telecommunications facility consisting of a 8.5 foot-high monopole extension with six antennas attached at the top. Four appurtenant radio equipment cabinets are proposed to be located on a new 13' x 16' concrete slab within a proposed 18' x 20' fenced-enclosed equipment compound. The proposed compound will be annexed to the existing compound at the site. There is no additional building area proposed in connection with this project. Site disturbance will be minimal. ^ total of eighteen arborvitae trees, ten feet in height, are proposed to be planted outside of the fenced compound. One GPS antenna is to be located on the proposed cable bridge. Cellular Architecture The geographic area in which the provider is licensed to operate is subdivided into small regions or "cells." These areas may be different in size and architecture, depending upon variables such as terrain and morphology classification. Each cell has a "nucleus" composed of a base transmitting station (BTS). The BTS is comprised of the hardware needed to support communication between the mobiles and the Public Telephone Switched Network (PTSN). PCS and cellular systems use a grid-type architecture that provides coverage using Iow power radio transmitters mounted on existing structures where available, or newly constructed communication structures. By constructing sufficient and strategically placed transmitters or base stations, PCS and cellular operators provide continuous and "seamless" coverage wherever the end user might be. Because users often pass through several cells as they travel through an area, the system automatically hands-off, the call from one base station to the next. The facility will provide service to area residents, businesses, and the traveling public. Zoning The subject property is situated entirely within the LI "Light Industrial" zone. Wireless Communications facilities are regulated under §280-67 through {}280-76.5 of the zoning ordinance (herein referred to as the Wireless Ordinance). This proposal represents a second priority location as set forth in §280-70D(1)(b). The applicant seeks site plan approval. To the extent that there are any deviations from the wireless ordinance, the Planning Board has taken the position that it has the authority to waive these items. The application advances the goals of the wireless ordinance in the following manner: §280-70D(1): Applicants for wireless communications facilities shall locate, site and erect said wireless facilities in accordance with the following priorities: (a) "On an existing antenna support structure or other structures on Town-owned properties, including the right of way; (b) On existing antenna support structure or other structures on other property in the Town...." §280-72A(5): Wireless communications facilities shall be designed to provide for co-location by multiple providers or designed so that they can be retrofitted to accommodate multiple providers, wherever possible. §280-67: It is the express purpose of the article to minimize the visual and environmental impacts of wireless communications facilities while protecting the health safety and welfare of Southold's citizens and allowing wireless service providers to meet their technological and service objectives. Positive Aspects In our advanced technological society there is a manifest need for improved wireless telecommunications. Wireless telecommunications now plays a vital role in preserving the safety of all citizens. As of December 2010 there are 302.9 million wireless subscriber connections in the United States? The number of wireless only households is 26.6%.2 Each day in the U.S. over 296,000 calls are made from wireless phones to 9- 1-1 and other emergency numbers.3 Wireless phones are routinely used to report traffic accidents, drunk driving incidents and suspected cdme activity to the proper authorities. The success of emergency relief and recovery efforts relies on the ability of workers to communicate effectively, efficiently and securely. Wireless technology is uniquely suited to these applications because (1) disasters typically do not affect wireless communication links; and, (2) the rapid deployment of a communications system for mobile field workers is more productive with a wireless system. The users of this system include insurance companies; emergency relief workers; federal, state and local disaster agencies; emergency medical personnel; and other suppliers of necessary services. The federal government's policy regarding the importance of enhanced wireless 9-1-1 service is expressed in Title 47, USCA §615 which states: "The Federal Communications Commission shall encourage and support efforts by States to deploy comprehensive end-to-end emergency communications infTastructure and programs, based on coordinated statewide plans, including seamless, ubiquitous, reliable telecommunications networks and enhanced wireless 9-1-1 service. In encouraging and supporting that deployment, the Commission shall consult and cooperate with State and local officials responsible for emergency services and public safety, the telecommunications industry .... the motor vehicle manufacturing industry, emergency medical service providers and emergency dispatch providem, transportation officials, special 9-t-1 districts, public safety, tire service and law enfomement officials, consumer groups, and hospital emergency and trauma care personnel." In addition to public safety services, a variety of other services available to the consumer advance the public good. These services include classroom networking, intelligent ~ www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/AID/10323 ~ www.ctia, org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/A1D/10323 3 www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/AID/10323 4 transportation systems (ITS), inventory management, electronic newspapers and other programs which transmit voice and data transmissions more efficiently and securely. The FCC mandates that wireless communication services shall be available to all the people of the United States at a reasonable charge, for the purposes of the national defense and promoting safety of life and property. The proposed base station facility located in the Town of Southold is necessary to construct and complete the FCC- licensed network. Potential Visual Impact The proposal does not change the number or locations of towers in Southold. Residents are passers-by are already acclimated to the presence of a tall structure in the area. The additional 8.5 foot extension will not change their perception of the site. The proposed increase in height is a superior planning alternative to the construction of a new tower in this community. Nationwide, co-location is favored in virtually all zoning ordinances, including the ordinances of the Town of Southold. There is no visual impact associated with the equipment area. The proposed landscaping will completely obscure the visibility of the equipment from surrounding areas. Computer photo-simulations of the proposed facility have been prepared by EBI Consulting and are part of this application. The document is entitled "Visual Analysis prepared for metroPCS, Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility, NY7314, County Road 48, Rev 3, provided by EBI Consulting, dated May 4, 2010 and revised August 4, 2011." The report depicts both pre-development and post- development conditions at six locations surrounding the site. David Karlebach, PP, PC has reviewed these photo-simulations and finds them to be accurate and correct. The photo-simulations represent a slight increase in the height of the monopole, the visibility of which is not harmful to the neighborhood. Conclusion The site is developed with an existing communications tower which is specifically designed to accommodate telecommunication antennas and equipment. This precludes the need to erect a new freestanding structure that would potentially have a far greater community impact. The location of the use on a previously developed site eliminates normal planning concerns with respect to access, drainage, and the availability of utilities. The spatial requirements are minimal; the proposed equipment area measures only 13 feet x 16 feet. There is no need for tree removal or site grading operations. The proposed monopole extension will have minimal effect on the surrounding area. If there is any visual impact associated with this site, it lies solely with the existing structure. The small increase in the height of the pole does not alter the visual quality of the site. The proposed facility will not have a significant impact on the environment or the community, and will not affect the quality of life of Southold residents in a negative way. The local reviewing agencies in Southold have determined that this site is particularly suited for this use when approving prior applications to install telecommunication antennas and equipment. It is prudent to conclude that a slight enhancement of the facility would yield the same findings. EBI Consulting Visual Analysis Prepared For: Unlimit Yourself, PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY NY7314 COUNTY ROAD 48 REV 3 Provided By: EBI Consulting May 4, 2010 Revised: August 4, 201 I EBI C 0 N S U L T I N G PN: 61093853 Site Number: NY7314 Site Name: County Road 48 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Prepared For: Metro PCS Provided By: EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 ph. 781.273.2500 fax 781.273.3311 EBI CONSULTING www.ebiconsulting, com 21 B Street Burlington, HA 01803 Tel: (78 I) 273.2500 Fax: (781) 273.3311 Letter of Methodology August I0, 201 I 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Site Name: NY?314 The following is a description of the methodology used by EBI Consulting in preparing the visual analysis study of the proposed MetroPCS instalbtion for the site located at 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY ("Property"). The proposed facility ("Facility") consists of small panel antennas mounted to a 8'-6' pole extension on an existing I00' monopole ("Existing Tower") at the Property and also related equipment on the ground. Both the antennas and equipment will be painted to match the existing monopole so as to not have any adverse visual impact to the area. A site visit was made on April 2~d, 2010 and photographs were taken from various locations around the Facility using an Olympus E-500 digital camera. The actual weather condition was clear, sunny and within reasonable visibility to perform the analysis. Using the technical and mechanical specification documents we built and arranged the Facility using 3D software called 3D Studio Max. 3D Studio Max allows us to add a daylight system that calculates what direction the sun will point according to what time of day, the date, and from the location the photographs were taken. The next step involved loading the map and the photographs taken at the site into 3D Studio Max and positioning virtual cameras in the software, based on the locations the photos were taken from. These cameras represent the photographer who took the photographs and it takes into consideration the average height at which the camera would have been held by an average five to six foot person. These cameras are placed at the exact locations on the map; therefore it automatically calculates the exact distance and perspective of the Facility. This generated simulated 3D views of the photographer's viewpoint plus the addition of the 3D model of the proposed Facility. Once these simulated viewpoints were created in 3D Studio Max, realistic lighting, shadows, and materials were rendered upon the proposed Facility and the result is multiple images that depict the proposed Facility on the photograph. The new images created by 3D Studio Max are imported into software called Photoshop and each view is labeled accordingly based upon the information provided by the field technician. The final product results in high quality existing and proposed images that accurately depict the addition of the proposed Facility, Kindly note that photo simulations are intended to represent modifications relative to a person observing the aesthetics of the proposed Facility. Therefore, they are inherently approximate in nature and should not be used as an exact, scaled, engineering drawing. Sincerely, John Menezes EBI Consulting Office: 781-425-5108 FAX: 781-425-5163 Mobile: 781-572-5173 jmenezes~,ebiconsulting.com www.ebiconsulting.com VISIBILITY MAP Legend -k Project Site Photo Location Points Photo location Map 0 400 ft 800 1200 1600 2000 METRO PCS/NY7314 - COUNTY ROAD 48 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 mEBI VIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CORNER OF CR48 & DEPOT LN. VIEW PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CORNER OF CR48 & DEPOT LN. ViEW 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING EAST FROM DEPOT LN. VIEW 2 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING EAST FROM DEPOT LN. VIEW 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM CR48 VIEW 3 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM CR 48 VIEW 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM COX LN. VIEW 4 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM COX LN. VIEW 5 EXISTINGCONDIT~ONS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CHURCH LN, VIEW 5 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CHURCH LN. ViEW 6 EX~STiNG CONDITIONS I LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CORNER OF COX LN.& MATTHEW'S LN, ViEW 6 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CORNER OF COX LN,& MATTHEW'S LN. EBI Consulting Visual Analysis Prepared For: metroPOS. Unlimit Yourself~ PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY NY7314 ~ COUNTY ROAD 48 REV I Provided By: '~', EBI Consulting May 4, 2010 C1 () N S U 1. I I N G PN: 61093853 EBI www.ebic onsulting.com 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: (781) 273.2500 Fax: (781) 273.3311 Letter of Methodology April 16, 2010 21 fi55 County Road 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Site Name: NY7314 The following is a description of the methodology used by EBI Consulting in preparing the visual analysis study of the proposed MetroPCS installation for the site located at 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY ("Property"). The proposed facility ("Facility") consists of small panel antennas mounted to a 12' pole extension on an existing 100' monopole ("Existing Tower") at the Property and also related equipment on the ground. Both the antennas and equipment will be painted to match the existing monopole so as to not have any adverse visual impact to the area. A site visit was made on April 2.d, 2010 and photographs were taken from various locations around the Facility using an Olympus E-500 digital camera. The actual weather condition was clear, sunny and within reasonable visibility to perform the analysis. Using the technical and mechanical specification documents we built and arranged the Facility using 3D software called 3D Studio Max. 3D Studio Max allows us to add a daylight system that calculates what direction the sun will point according to what time of day, the date, and from the location the photographs were taken. The next step involved loading the map and the photographs taken at the site into 3D Studio Max and positioning virtual cameras in the software, based on the locations the photos were taken from. These cameras represent the photographer who took the photographs and it takes into consideration the average height at which the camera would have been held by an average five to six foot person. These cameras are placed at the exact locations on the map; therefore it automatically calculates the exact distance and perspective of the Facility. This generated simulated 3D views of the photographer's viewpoint plus the addition of the 3D model of the proposed Facility. Once these simulated viewpoints were created in 3D Studio Max, realistic lighting, shadows, and materials were rendered upon the proposed Facility and the result is multiple images that depict the proposed Facility on the photograph. The new images created by 3D Studio Max are imported into software called Photoshop and each view is labeled accordingly based upon the information provided by the field technician. The final product results in high quality existing and proposed images that accurately depict the addition of the proposed Facility. Kindly note that photo simulations are intended to represent modifications relative co a person observing the aesthetics of the proposed Facility. Therefore, they are inherendy approximate in nature and should not be used as an exact, scaled, engineering drawing. Sincerely, Ross Jackson Graphic Design Manager EBI Consulting Office: 781-418-2339 FAX: 781-418*2359 Mobile: 781 ~552-1466 ~oss ~ackson (~c bico nsult mg.c o m Site Number: NY7314 Site Name: County Road 48 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Prepared For: Metro PCS Provided By: EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 ph. 781.273.2500 fax 781.273.3311 VISIBILITY MAP Legend ~r Project Site Photo Location Points Photo location Hap 400 ft 800 11200 1600 2000 N METRO PCS/NY7314 - COUNTY ROAD 48 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 PN: 61093853 EBI VIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CORNER OFCR48 & DEPOTLN, V~EW I PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CORNER OFCR48 &DEPOTLN, V~EW 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING EAST FROM DEPOTLN, ViEW 2 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING EAST FROM DEPOT LN. VIEW 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROMCR48 VIEW 3 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM CR48 VIEW 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM COX LN. ViEW 4 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM COX LN. ViEW 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CHURCH LN. VIEW 5 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CHURCH LN. Z Z Z 0 0 uJ LU 0 n 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southotd, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 January 10,2012 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Close Public Hearing: Proposed Amended Site Plan for MetroPCS at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: LI Dear Mr. Coughlin: A public hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 9, 2012 regarding the above-referenced Amended Site Plan. The public hearing was closed. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald ~V~/ilcenski Chairman RE, NIELSEN,ATTORNEysHUBER AT ~¢ LAwCOUGHLIN' LLP 30 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 TELEPHONE: (Of31) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (Ol]l) 4~5-4104 January 5, 2012 VIA UPS DELIVERY Town of Soutbold Planning Board I'own Annex Building 54375 Mare Road Southold, NY 11971 Atm.: Brian A. Cummings, Planner I/E: MetroPCS New York, LLC {"MetroPCS') (Site No. NY7314) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: 21855 County Road 48. Cutchogue, New York SCTM#: 1000-96 1-19.1 Dear Mr. Cummings: On behalf of our clieut, MetroPCS, we submit herewith an executed Affidavit of Mailiug, together with copies of the Public Hearing Notice and list of all surrounding properly owuers notified by certified mail. Also enclosed are the certified mailing receipts and green signature cards received to date. We will submit any additional green signature cards received hereafter with your office prior to the Public Hearing. Should you have any questions with respect to the tbregoing, please do not hesitate to communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you tbr your courtesies, we remain Vel'5' truly yours, RI~. NIELSEN, tlUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP JJC:mp Enclosures AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I pemonally posted the property known as 21855 C.R. 48, Cutchogue, New York - SCTM# 1000 - 96 - 1 - 19.1 by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on Monday, Januar,/9, 20!~,T ,,, Signature Patrick S. O'Rourke Notary Public State of New York No. 010R6252092 Qualified in Nassau County Commision Expires I~. $, 20/__ JAN 6 2012 PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDA VIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 116112 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for MetroPCS New York at Jun.e SCTM~s: 1000-96-t-19.t Date of Hearing: Monday, January 9, 2012. 4:30 o.m. MAILING AFFIDAVIT OF ~ 21855 C.R. 48, Cutchogue, New York - SCTM# 1000 - 96 - 1 - i9.1 On Friday, Decembtr 30, 20! ], [ have sent notices, by certified mail- return receipt, the receipts and green return rece[pt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of ever~ propert~ which abuts and ever~ property which is acrone on ¢.R. 48 Marisa Knoth Your Name (print) Signature c/o 36 North New York Avenue, Huntington, NY 11743 Addre~ 12/30/11 S~aorn to before me tJ:r~ 30t:h day of December, DOROTHY A. BELARD NoraW Public, State of New York No. 01BE6036810 Qua!ified in Suffolk County , Commission Expires Feb. ?, 20 ~ 2011 PLEASE RETURN THISAFFIDA VIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, FrL, 116112 Re: Pmnosed Amended Sit. Plan for MetroPCS New York at Junl/n SCTMf~: 1000-96-t-19.1 Date of Hearing: Mondsv, January 9. 2012. 4:30 n.m. LIST OF OWNERS OF RECORD FOR PROPERTIES WHICH ABUT AND ARE ACROSS FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET FROM 21855 C.R. 48, CUTCHOGUE, NY (SCTM # 1000 - 96 - 1 - 19.1) 1000 - 96 - 1 - 17.5 Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 1000 - 96 - 1 -20.1 27A North LLC c/o Chris MohrLandscaping 22155 C.R. 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 1000-96- 1- 18.3 Jennie L. Taylor 1425 Gabriella Court Mattituck, NY 11952 1000 - 96 - 2 - 8 Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted DelNe~ Fee (End(~rsement Required) Total Postage & Fees or PO Box No, Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 iComplete items 1, 2, and 3. ~ complete 1 item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ~ Print your name and add ,ralston the reverse! so that we can return the ~ to you. m Attach this card to the back of the mailpiecef or on the front if space perrnlts. 1. A~ticle Addressed to: Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 PS Form 3811 ' 2004 A. Signature B. Received l, D, hem Item t? Savk~ ~pe [] Retum Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured M~11 [] C.O.D. 4. Res',~cted Deliver? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 7011 0110 0000 5835 7492 Retm. m'm Receipt FF C · Comple;~e ~ms 1,2, and 3. Also complete. item 4 if Re~blcted Delivery Is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can tatum the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Adicle Addressed to: 27A North LLC c/o Chris Mohr Landscaping 22155 C.R. 48 Cutcho§ue, NY 11935 [] Addressee 2. ArticleNurnber 7011 0t10 0D ~:¢a (Transfer from service labe~ ~:;%;/. 27A North LLC c/o Chris Mohr ~ N..o:... Landscaping ~, z~P+, 22155 C.R. 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 FF Jennie L Taylor 1425 Gabriella Court Mattituck, NY 11952 PS Form 381 1, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 1025~-0~-~-1S40 ~ RI , NIELSEN, HUBER & GOUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT TELEPHONP;: (Cd;ti) 42.5-4100 I;'A(:$IMILE: (1381) 425-4104 I)cccmber 29.201 I BY HAND Town of Southold Planning Board I'own Annex Bailding 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Brian A. ('ummings, Planner lC, E: MelroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Pending Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCTM#: 1000 96 1-19.1 Dear Mr. Cummings: As you know. we represent MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS') with regard to its pending application to colocate at the existing public utility wireless telecommunications facility at the subject property. In furtherance of those items requested in your correspondence of November 22, 201 I (copy attached hereto) and discussed during the Work Session held on November 14, 2012, and in anticipation ot'the Public Hearing scheduled fbr January 9. 2012, we enclose herewith the following docLlments: I. Original and seven (7) copies of Supplemental Affidavit of Nicholas Balzano, Radio Frequency Fmgineer, together with Propagatiou Maps; and 2. Eight (8) counterparts of correspondence of Robert Toms, P.E., MTM Design Group, Inc., together with photographs and elevation details. ShoLdd )ou have an5 questions with regard to the tbregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. I'hanking 3ou for your courlesies, wc remain Vet'5 trttly yours, RI'i, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP .I,l(':mk [:,nclosurcs cc w/o cucls.: Heather Lanza, Planning Director (via cmail) PLAN~G BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 November 22, 2011 John Coughlin, Esq. c/o Rd, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge 21855 C.R. 48, +800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: I am writing as a follow-up to the Work Session held on November 14, 2011 where the Planning Board formally accepted the above-referenced site plan for review with revisions to be made immediately. Please submit the following (as requested in our previous letter dated September 19, 2011): Provide written documentation and specific details explaining why the 97'6" height location that appears vacant on the existing monopole is not available (the rationale provided by your architect was not corroborated by our consultant - see attached letter from CMS- please let us know if there ts something that our consultant missed in the information you provided). Provide propagation maps utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, at 97'6", and comparing that height with the proposed 110'3" height. We would like to see the maps at -85dBm and -95dBm. We must be able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage between the proposed height and 97'6". Provide a written detailed description, by the preparers of the propagation maps, explaining the differences in coverage between the 97'6" height and the proposed 110'3" height. The applicant must provide this additional information to demonstrate that the existing location on the monopole is not sufficient and proving that the additional height is necessary. MetroPCS at Jun.qe Pa,qe Two November 22, 2011 4. Submit a photometric plan for all proposed lighting pursuant to §172 of the Southold Town Code. As described in §280-73 Special Exception Approval, the Planning Board must find that the proposed modification of the existing facility is a public necessity and that them are compelling masons which make it more feasible to construct the proposed height addition rather than placing the new antennas in the available gap. Further, the Planning Board must find that the proposed is at the lowest height above the ground feasible to achieve the service needs of the carrier and that the rationale behind the explanation from the applicant must be corroborated by an independent consultant hired by the Town. Other considerations include, but are not limited to, ensuring that the applicant has maximized the design characteristics to reduce visual impacts and obtrusiveness. Pursuant to §280-74 C (14), the Planning Board has deemed this information necessary to the application to assess compliance with this article. The above-referenced information is vital to completing our review so that the Planning Board can make an informed decision and ensure the proposed meets the requirements of the Town Code. The Planning Board has agreed to schedule the public hearing for the January public meeting. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Brian A. Cummings Planner Encl. 2 (518)439-3079 THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE DRIVE GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX (518)478-0909 November 7, 2011 (via email and regular mail) Chairman Sidor and Planning Board Members Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, MY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for a proposed wireless telecommunication facility Premises - 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Dear Chairman Sidor and Members of the Planning Board Members: We have reviewed the supplemental application materials submitted for the above referenced facility with cover letter dated October 27, 2011. That material included correspondence of Lou Mogiino, AIA, of MTM Design Group, Inc. dated October 20, 2011. Upon review, including a review by our structural engineer, we offer the following comments: The applicant proposes to install an 8'6" extension to the existing 100'5" (AGL) monopole and attach three (3) antenna sectors with two (2) antennas per sector to the extension, thereby increasing the actual height of the overall structure to a height of 112'6" (AGL). In our previous submittal, we disagreed with the statement that the next available height on the existing monopole is sixty feet (60). As per the construction drawings submitted with the application and signed and sealed by Luis Moglino (Registered NYS Architect #028992) of MTM Design Group, as noted on page A-3, there appears to be sufficient space available between 92'11" to 102', to locate the proposed MetroPCS antennas, thereby eliminating the need to extend the structure. On page A-6 of same drawings, detail 3, Antenna Detail, the dimension for the proposed antennas are noted as 51.4" (inches). Antennas of that size could be mounted at centerline heights of approx. 97'6". At this location the clearance between proposed and existing antennas above and below would not interfere with the service from the existing installations. Please note the letter provided on October 20, 2011 by MTM design group referenced the following OSHA regulation: "OSHA regulations, Standards -29 CFR, 1926 Subpart M, Fall Protection" The following has been taken directly from that referenced regulation. Note the italics below. 1926.500(a)(2)(iii) Fall protection requirements for employees performing steel erection work (except for towers and tanks) are provided in subpart R of this part. 1926.500(a)(2)(ivO Section 1926.502 does not apply to the erection of tanks and communication and broadcast towers. (Note: Section 1926.104 sets the criteria for body belts, lanyards and lifelines used for fall protection during tank and communication and broadcast tower erection. Paragraphs (b), (c) and 09 of ~ 1926.107 provide definitions for the pertinent terms.) MTM also referenced "OSHA 3124-12R 2003 guide" It should be noted that OSHA has a regulation specific to Telecommunications. It is 29 CFR 1910.268 OSHA - Telecommunications Standard. This is the applicable standard to be used. I have attached photographs of a tower in Nebraska that illustrates climbing facilities through flat light sector frames which are located close vertically to each other. Based on the standard of practice shown in the photographs and an open space of nearly seven feet (7'), it would appear there is adequate space to install a Flat Light Sector Frame that can support the proposed antennas. It is our belief that the items (ladder, pipe masts and dish antenna) described in Mr. Moglino's letter would not hinder service. In our previous submittal we recommended "that propagation maps, utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, be provided at those heights. (We would like to see the maps at -85dBm and -95dBm) We would also recommend that the industry describe in detail by the person preparing the maps, any differences at those heights, in particular the 97'6" height, for coverage versus the coverage at the proposed 110'3" height. (If provided, it is imperative that we are able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage described by the applicant.) There were no additional propagation maps submitted as requested. We can thus only assume that there is no significant difference in coverage at 97.6 feet, versus the coverage at the proposed 110'3" height and that 97.6 feet would provide the needed coverage. In light of the foregoing, we cannot confirm the need to extend the existing stmctore to accommodate a new wireless telecommunications facility at this location. We need a resolution to this issue to complete our review and provide comments for the Board to make an informed decision. As such, we believe that the application material as provided is incomplete. If you require anything further please give me a call at (518)439-3079. Sincerely, ~', ~ ~nu~(electronie signature) Richard A. Comi CMS CC: Martin Finnegan (via e-mail) Heather Lanza (via email) Al Tagliaferri (via e-mall) Attachments DESIGN GROUPI ARC H I1' E CT U R E ENGINEERING · PO BOX 3 · HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 · TEL: 732 817 9090 · FAX: 732 847 4335 · December28,2011 Brian A. Cummings Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 District: 1000, Section: 96, Block: 1, Lot: 19.1 Metro PCS #: NY7314 MTM#: 09MPSTS014 Dear Mr. Cummings, As the Amhitecture & Engineering firm that designed the proposed installation for MetroPCS at 21855 County Road 48, please accept this revised letter in response to the November 22, 2011 Town of Southold Planning Board that was received and reviewed along with the additional comments provided by CMS to address the proposed Metro PCS antenna height in question and to f~rther clad~ the existing obstructions on the tower. As noted, there is vacant space on the existing monopole at the 97'-6" elevation, however, the existing obstructions would prevent Metro PCS from installing antennas at this location. Although the existing antennas above this 97'-6" space are located at a 104'-0" centerline, the platform to which they are attached is mounted at 100'-0". There is an existing ladder for access to the existing platform that hangs approximately 5' below, into the vacant space. Additionally, there are also existing pipe masts and a 24 inch square dish antenna mounted to the platform which also extends below into this vacant space. The obstructions noted above can be seen in the photos on the following page. Given the existing obstructions and the height of the proposed MetroPCS antennas, if the proposed installation were feasible at a lower height; then the only viable space to locate the proposed Metro PCS antennas would be at a 96'-0" centedine. This would leave an approximate separation of only 2" between the top of the proposed antennas and the bottom of the existing dish panel antenna on the platform above. The existing access ladder extending below the platform would possibly require relocating to avoid any interference for the proposed Metro PCS installation along with mitigating any potential climbing hazards. We provided an updated detailed section of this elevation portion of the tower to represent, as best as possible, the existing conditions along with the proposed Metro PCS antennas at this section of the tower. Based on the additional information, if the proposed installation was to be at or near 96'-0"; this would need to be further evaluated by the Radio Frequency expert to provide adequate feedback of the acceptability. Sh~ You have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. $io6~rely, Robert Toms, PE MTM Design Group, inc. cc: MetroPCS John J. Coughlin / Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP File ZXIS-!N® 24' ,/ER~ZON ',z!CRO,dA,,/E PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTED TO PIPE MAc BELO~ EXiSTN,S PLA-FOR'"' ~,~ ~ER Or~ PR~P. ~ETRO ='CS ,ANTENNAS *e'-o'± ABOVE SRAOE 0 / $EOTO~, S TOTAL) WOUNTED TO ~ONOPOLE QN NOTE: TOP OF TOWER 21.15" ~IA TOP OF EXIS-IN® ANTENNAS iO6'-O"± ADO/-- ,SRAOE CENTER OF EX:STIN~ ,ANTENNAS O4'-0" ABOVE GRADE TOP OF EX STIN.S MONOP©LE :OO-5"~ ~BOVE ®RAPE TOP OF EX STIN® ANTENNAS q2'-II'l ABOVE GRADE CENTER OF --.XIo~ :N® AN :..NNA'o 'dO ~l:C~: ABOVE ®RADE TOP Oc- EXISTING ANTENNAS 85-O"~ ABOVE GRADE CENTER O= EXISTIN® ANTENNAS 82'-6"i ~BOVE GRAPE TO~ OF EXISTIN® ANTENNAS 72'-5'± ABOVE ®RA~E CENTER OF EX STIN® ANTENNAS 70-2'~ ABOVE ®RAPE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC For Approval to collocate public utility wireless telecommunications antennas on a proposed extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York District 1000 Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 [MetroPCS Site No. NY 7314] STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF RADIO FREQUENCY ENGINEER NICHOLAS BALZANO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer for MetroPCS New York, LLC (hereinafter "MetroPCS"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in MetroPCS' wireless telecommunications network and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy these service deficiencies. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. I am fully familiar with MetroPCS' wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit this supplemental affidavit in further support of MetroPCS' application for approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. Pursuant to this application, MetroPCS requests approval to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to a proposed extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment on the ground as depicted in the plans submitted herewith. 3. The Town has requested that MetroPCS prepare and submit propagation maps depicting what coverage MetroPCS could provide if it located its antennas in the space between the existing Verizon and T-Mobile antennas. I have analyzed and prepared propagation maps showing the coverage that would be afforded at a centerline height of 96' (I conducted this anaysis at 96', and not 97'-6" due to the physical/spatial limitations on the existing monopole). These maps are attached. 4. A facility at 96' would provide approximately 2.129 square miles of reliable coverage at -85dBm. This would still leave a substantial gap in coverage in the area and would not meet MetroPCS' coverage objectives in the area. The proposed extension will allow MetroPCS to provide approximately 3.183 square miles of reliable coverage at -85dBm. The proposed extension will allow MetroPCS to provide an additional 1.054 square miles of reliable coverage in the vicinity of the premises and will obviate the need for the construction of a new facility. 5. To further explain the difference in coverage at -85dBm, I analyzed the amount of coverage along some of the roadways in the vicinity of the Premises. The table below identified the roadways, coverage along each roadway with the extension, coverage along each roadway with the site installed at 96', and the difference in coverage along each roadway between the extension and installation at 96'. ROADWAY Coverage with the Coverage at 96' Loss in coverage proposed extension without the extension Oregon Road 1.5 miles 1.1 miles 0.4 miles Alvahs Lane 0.53 miles 0.36 miles 0.17 miles Depot Lane 1.9 miles 1.3 miles 0.6 miles Bridge Lane 0.9 miles 0.7 miles 0.2 miles These differences are significant and will leave substantial stretches of roadways uncovered in the vicinity of the Premises. 6. A facility at 96' would provide approximately 7.005 square miles of reliable coverage at -95dBm. This would still leave a substantial gap in coverage in the area and would not meet MetroPCS' coverage objectives in the area. The proposed extension will allow MetroPCS to provide approximately 8.483 square miles of reliable coverage at -95dBm. The proposed extension will allow MetroPCS to provide an additional 1.478 square miles of reliable coverage in the vicinity of the premises and will obviate the need for the construction of a new facility. 2 7. Unless this application is granted as proposed, MetroPCS will be unable to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. Sworn to before me this C~ day of D59~ber, 2011. NOTARY PUBL1C~ DENISE QUAGLIETTA NOTARY PUSLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK NO. 01QU6215483 Qualified in Rockland County Town of Southold Dec, 1, 2011 Site iD NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Map Scale: 1" = 0.6580 mi Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites On Air Sites MAP 9 Town of Southold Dec, J, 2011 Site ID NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Map Scale; 1" = 0.6580 mi Town Boundaries Subject Site MAP 1 0 Coverage from Subject Site Proposed Sites and Adjacent Sites On Air Sites Prepared by Town of Southold Dec. 1,2011 Site ID NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites On Air Sites MAP 11 Coverage f~om ~ubject site Town of Southold Site ID NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Map Scale: 1" = 0,6580 mi -95 dsm In Vehicle at 110' -95 dsm In Vehicle ~t Subject Site Proposed Sites On Air Sites MAP 12 Coverage from Subject Site and Adjacent Sites Prepared by #10499 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Candice Schott of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successively, commencing on the 22nd day of December, 2011. Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this ~-'1~--~ .'j% 6) day o.,---~?L"Cd~,(~-~-- 2011. CHRISTINA VOLINSKI ',iO~ApV PUBLIC SIATF OF NEW YORF, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN II. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENStCI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 9th day of January, 2012 on the question of the following: 4:30 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS NY at Junge, located at 21855 CR 48, +800' west of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-96-1-19.1 Dated: 12/13/11 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2011 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times Page 1 of 1 Kalin, Carol From: Candice Schott [cschott@timesreview.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 9:40 AM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: RE: Legal Ad for 12/22 Suffolk Times Hi Carol, I have received the notice and we are good to go for the 12/22 issue. Thanks and have a great upcoming Holiday! Candice From: Kalin, Carol [mailto:CaroI.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 2:50 PM To: tr-legals Subject: Legal Ad for 12/22 Suffolk Times Importance: High Please print the attached legal ad for the 1/9/12 Planning Board Public Hearing regarding the MetroPCS NY at Junge Site Plan in the 12/22/11 edition of the Suffolk Times. An e-mail confirmation of receipt for our files will be appreciated. Thanks. Carol Kalin, Secretarial Assistant Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Annex, 54375 NYS Rt. 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Carol.Kalin~town.southold.ny.us 12/14/2011 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSK/ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 9th day of January, 2012 on the question of the following: 4:30 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS NY at Junge, located at 21855 CR 48, +800' west of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-96-1-19.1 Dated: 12/13/11 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 13th day of December, 2011 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 1/9/12 Regular Meetin.q: 4:30 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Amended Site Plan for MetroPCS NY at Junge, SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 - ' Car~)l I~li~ - Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this ~-o'/4'~. day of ~'~..~w,,'~ ~v', 2011. Notary PabtFc MELANIE DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Yot~ No, 01D04634870 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires September 30, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JA~VIES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southaid, N~r Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 December 13,2011 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Set Public Hearing: Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96.-1-19.1 Zoning District: LI Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, December 12, 2011, adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, this amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, January 9, 2012 at 4:30 p.m. for a public hearing regarding the site plan, dated May 11,2010, prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the siRned ,qreen return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, January 6th. The siRn and the post need to be returned to the PlanninR Board Office after the public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Southold Town Plannin.q Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for an Amended Site Plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the LI Zoning District; That the application is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment. The property is located at 21855 CR 48, +800' west of Cox Lane, Cutchogue; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2nd FI., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. Information can also be obtained via the internet by sending an e-mail message to: CaroI.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us; The office will close on Friday, December 23rd and Friday, December 30th at 11:30 a.m., and will be closed all day on Monday, December 26th and Monday, January 2nd. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, January 9, 2012 at 4:30 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southotd Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: MetroPCS New York at Junge Date: 12/13/11 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon~ Fri. 116112 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for MetroPCS New York at Jun~le SCTM#s: 1000-96-1-19.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, January 97 2012, 4:30 p.m. To~n of $outhoM PC/Codebook for V~ndo~s §55'1' Pr0vidingn°ticeofpUbliehearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L. No. 12=2003] Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing this section shall apply. Upon determiaing that an application or petition is complete, the board or cotnmission revi~ the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. Notice relating to a public heating On an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A.. Town responsibility for publication of notice. The reviewing bOard or commission shall cause a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to b~ published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiate/~ proposed or -r~l..uested by an applicant or petitioner, other thnn~ a Town board or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: (1) The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, givh!g notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the'time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shali be set back not more than~-~l 0 'feet fi'om the proffe~y line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date of ~e public hearing. The applicant, petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidaVit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or Petitioner is required to send notice to the owners ofreC°rd of every propertywhich abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition~ Such notice shall:be made by - certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven days prio~- to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall inciude description of the street location and area of the subject property, nature of relief oi- approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant, petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. JUNGE, ARTHUR V. SITE PLAN FOR METROPCS NY AT JUNGE 1000-96-1-19.1 This amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, ~d install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District. MONDAY- JAN. 9, 2012- 4:30 P.M. ~7~ UNE Z7 LIN~= ~7 ---- -- LIN~ FOR pCL NO COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (~) Real Property Tax Sen/ice Agency SEC~ONNO 96 PLANNING BOAI~D MEMBERS MARTIN It. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CRE1VIERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES II. RICII III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southald, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southald, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 November 22,2011 John Coughlin, Esq. c/o R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Site Plan for MetroPCS @ Junge 21855 C.R. 48, _+800' West of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: I am writing as a follow-up to the Work Session held on November 14,2011 where the Planning Board formally accepted the above-referenced site plan for review with revisions to be made immediately. Please submit the following (as requested in our previous letter dated September 19, 2011): Provide written documentation and specific details explaining why the 97'6" height location that appears vacant on the existing monopole is not available (the rationale provided by your architect was not corroborated by our consultant- see attached letter from CMS- please let us know if there is something that our consultant missed in the information you provided). Provide propagation maps utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, at 97'6", and comparing that height with the proposed 110'3" height. We would like to see the maps at -85dBm and -95dBm. We must be able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage between the proposed height and 97'6". Provide a written detailed description, by the preparers of the propagation maps, explaining the differences in coverage between the 97'6" height and the proposed 110'3" height. The applicant must provide this additional information to demonstrate that the existing location on the monopole is not sufficient and proving that the additional height is necessary. MetroPCS at Jun,qe Pa,qe Two November 22,2011 4. Submit a photometric plan for all proposed lighting pursuant to §172 of the Southold Town Code. As described in §280-73 Special Exception Approval, the Planning Board must find that the proposed modification of the existing facility is a public necessity and that there are compelling reasons which make it more feasible to construct the proposed height addition rather than placing the new antennas in the available gap. Further, the Planning Board must find that the proposed is at the lowest height above the ground feasible to achieve the service needs of the carrier and that the rationale behind the explanation from the applicant must be corroborated by an independent consultant hired by the Town. Other considerations include, but are not limited to, ensuring that the applicant has maximized the design characteristics to reduce visual impacts and obtrusiveness. Pursuant to §280-74 C (14), the Planning Board has deemed this information necessary to the application to assess compliance with this article. The above-referenced information is vital to completing our review so that the Planning Board can make an informed decision and ensure the proposed meets the requirements of the Town Code. The Planning Board has agreed to schedule the public hearing for the January public meeting. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Brian A. Cummings Planner Encl. 2 (518)439-3079 THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE DRIVE GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX (518)478-0909 November 7, 2011 (via email and regular mail) Chairman Sidor and Planning Board Members Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, MY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for a proposed wireless telecommunication facility Premises - 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Dear Chairman Sidor and Members of the Planning Board Members: We have reviewed the supplemental application materials submitted for the above referenced facility with cover letter dated October 27, 2011. That material included correspondence of Lou Moglino, AIA, of MTM Design Group, Inc. dated October 20, 2011. Upon review, including a review by our structural engineer, we offer the following comments: The applicant proposes to install an 8'6" extension to the existing 100'5" (AGL) monopole and attach three (3) antenna sectors with two (2) antennas per sector to the extension, thereby increasing the actual height of the overall structure to a height of 112'6" (AGL). In our previous submittal, we disagreed with the statement that the next available height on the existing monopole is sixty feet (60). As per the construction drawings submitted with the application and signed and sealed by Luis Moglino (Registered NYS Architect//028992) of MTM Design Group, as noted on page A-3, there appears to be sufficient space available between 92'11" to 102', to locate the proposed MetroPCS antennas, thereby eliminating the need to extend the structure. On page A-6 of same drawings, detail 3, Antenna Detail, the dimension for the proposed antennas are noted as 51.4" (inches). Antennas of that size could be mounted at centerline heights of approx. 97'6". At this location the clearance between proposed and existing antennas above and below would not interfere with the service from the existing installations. Please note the letter provided on October 20, 2011 by MTM design group referenced the following OSHA regulation: "OSHA regulations, Standards -29 CFR, 1926 Subpart M, Fall Protection" The following has been taken directly from that referenced regulation. Note the italics below. 1926.500(a)(2)(iii) Fall protection requirements for employees performing steel erection work (except for towers and tanks) are provided in subpart R of this part. 1926.500(a)(2)(i~ Section 1926.502 does not apply to the erection of tanks and communication and broadcast towers. ~ote: Section 1926.104 sets the criteria for body belts, lanyards and lifelines used for fall protection during tank and communication and broadcast tower erection. Paragraphs (b), (c) and 09 of 3~ 1926.107provide definitions for the pertinent terms.) MTM also referenced "OSHA 3124-12R 2003 guide" It should be noted that OSHA has a regulation specific to Telecommunications. It is 29 CFR 1910.268 OSHA - Telecommunications Standard. This is the applicable standard to be used. I have attached photographs of a tower in Nebraska that illustrates climbing facilities through flat light sector frames which are located close vertically to each other. Based on the standard of practice shown in the photographs and an open space of nearly seven feet (7'), it would appear there is adequate space to install a Flat Light Sector Frame that can support the proposed antennas. It is our belief that the items (ladder, pipe masts and dish antenna) described in Mr. Moglino's letter would not hinder service. In our previous submittal we recommended "that propagation maps, utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, be provided at those heights. (We would like to see the maps at -85dBm and -95dBm) We would also recommend that the industry describe in detail by the person preparing the maps, any differences at those heights, in particular the 97'6" height, for coverage versus the coverage at the proposed 110'3" height. (If provided, it is imperative that we are able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage described by the applicant.) There were no additional propagation maps submitted as requested. We can thus only assume that there is no significant difference in coverage at 97.6 feet, versus the coverage at the proposed 110'3" height and that 97.6 feet would provide the needed coverage. In light of the foregoing, we cannot confirm the need to extend the existing structure to accommodate a new wireless telecommunications facility at this location. We need a resolution to this issue to complete our review and provide comments for the Board to make an informed decision. As such, we believe that the application material as provided is incomplete. If you require anything further please give me a call at (518)439-3079. Sincerely, ~', ,'it. ~(electronic signature) Richard A. Comi CMS CC.' Martin Finnegan (via e-mail) Heather Lanza (via email) A1 Tagliaferri (via e-mail) Attachments PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair W/LLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI November 16, 2011 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Richard A. Comi Center for Muncipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re: Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS New York, LLC at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: LI Dear Mr. Comi: Enclosed for your records is the Vendor Copy of Purchase Order # 23057 and executed copy of the Agreement in connection with your review of the above wireless application. I also enclose a sample copy of a Payment Voucher Form for your future reference in completing this accounting form for us. The General Ledger Fund/Account Number will always be the same. Your Vendor Number is 3321. Noting the project name and tax map number is also helpful. If you have any questions regarding the above, or need a supply of voucher forms, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly your. s, Linda Randolph Secretarial Assistant Encs. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, November 14, 2011 2:30 p.m. Executive Board Room, Town Hall Annex 2:00 p.m. Executive Session 2:30 p.m. Applications ~[9Le~t name: [ G.W. Meade Farm ~SCTM#' 1000-69-5-~-~ Locaii0ni ...................... i '""~' ~ ~-,~i~'ri~"P~' 'J:.~ n'~" , connecting to a 14,400 s.f. indoor arena for the keeping/breeding/raising and training of horses and a riding academy with 10 parking spa~s. Also~ ~ on the prope~ are a 1,140 s.f. single-family dwelling, a 1,965 s.f. frame barn and a 700 s.f. frame bud ng Action: ~ Status U~date; review neighbors concerns. ~c~m~nts: ........ Staff Repo~- ............ ?_r_oje~c_t_name:_ ........ Metro PCS st Junge ................. 'T~_S~C__TM#: ! 1000-96-1-19.1 ._L_o__c~_ti~on.'_ ....................... _2_]855 CR 48, Cutcho~!ue Descnpbon. Th s amended s~te plan ~s for a MetroPCS w re ess co-location of antennas on an existing 100'5" monopole with a proposed pole extension _h_e_i~ h t_._o_f.__81.6 "_!_n._.t h__e._.L_ I_ Z_o_n_i _n g._D.!s_t rict___: ...................................................... L .St. at_u~j New Application Action: -F~'~-~ie--W- f~ ~-n~ ~(~ '-~-u-~'j~t~-(J~- ....................................................................... Attachments: er l"er'w'n.. ..... 1 .I! i:.~)~'ii0~ ....................... ]'"~;~h~--~'~:~--~:Y~-~oute 25 and Town Harbor Road, Sout-~0'i~- i ap..proved amended site~lan for 2,660 s_c/:, ff. storage bud rig. Attachments: ! 8/19/11 ~.PJ Sound Av , i an office in connection with the over-all farm use of the site on 1.03 acresi located n the A-C Zoning. Distr ct i Pending_ Southold Town Planning Board Pa,qe Two November 14, 2011 Project name. ! Connecticut Mumclpal Electric t SCTM#: 1000-6-8-7 & 3.2 ............ i Energy Cooperative Location' ....................... "~-8'~-~" C~ ......... ' .................... ~ .................. : ~ ............ ~.!~a_[I Ave. F~shers Island Descnption: I Addition of ............... ~ facili_ty on a 47, 441 sg ft. parcel located in the Business District. A~achme~i~ ................ ......................... _Pr~j. ec~.~_~ ~ Jameson Farms ........................... __~_~]on: .... ! 29525 Route 25 Orient Descriptiom- ............ ~ where Lot 1 = 14.5 acres with 12 acres sold as Deve opment Rights ............ ~ Suffolk Coun~nd where Lot 2 = 3 acres. ~tatus: ............... _. ..................... J ........ ~,~ ............... .~t~.~L ....... ~ Review application for completeness A~achments' ---~ S~nnd ................ ~pj~j~t ~ame: j S~nton, Phil & Jennifer , - ......... , ..................... ~ Location Ma e Lan . ~ ........... : .......... p e Southold j Descnpbon. ~ This proposal ~s for ~o~ s~n~ub~ivisi~-~ t~-~:~-Zo~'~ [ _ ~ D str ct j Review site visit. 3:45 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda (518)439-3079 November 7, 2011 THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE DRIVE GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX (518)478-0909 (via email and regular mail) Chairman Sidor and Planning Board Members Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, MY 11971 MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for a proposed wireless telecommunication facility Premises - 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Dear Chairman Sidor and Members of the Planning Board Members: We have reviewed the supplemental application materials submitted for the above referenced facility with cover letter dated October 27, 2011. That material included correspondence of Lou Moglino, AIA, of MTM Design Group, Inc. dated October 20, 2011. Upon review, including a review by our structural engineer, we offer the following comments: The applicant proposes to install an 8'6" extension to the existing 100'5" (AGL) monopole and attach three (3) antenna sectors with two (2) antennas per sector to the extension, thereby increasing the actual height of the overall structure to a height of 112'6" (AGL). In our previous submittal, we disagreed with the statement that the next available height on the existing monopole is sixty feet (60). As per the construction drawings submitted with the application and signed and sealed by Luis Moglino (Registered NYS Architect #028992) of MTM Design Group, as noted on page A-3, there appears to be sufficient space available between 92'11" to 102', to locate the proposed MetroPCS antennas, thereby eliminating the need to extend the structure. On page A-6 of same drawings, detail 3, Antenna Detail, the dimension for the proposed antennas are noted as 51.4" (inches). Antennas of that size could be mounted at centerline heights of approx. 97'6". At this location the clearance between proposed and existing antennas above and below would not interfere with the service from the existing installations. Please note the letter provided on October 20, 2011 by MTM design group referenced the following OSHA regulation: "OSHA regulations, Standards -29 CFR, 1926 Subpart M, Fall Protection" The following has been taken directly from that referenced regulation. Note the italics below. 1926.500(a)(2)(iii) Fall protection requirements for employees performing steel erection work (except for towers and tanks) are provided in subpart R of this part. 1926.500(a)(2)(iv) Section 1926. 502 does not apply to the erection of tanks and communication and broadcast towers. (Note: Section 1926.104 sets the criteria for body belts, lanyards and lifelines used for fall protection during tank and communication and broadcast tower erection. Paragraphs (b), (c) and 60 of 3~ 1926.107provide definitions for the pertinent terms.) MTM also referenced "OSHA 3124-12R 2003 guide" It should be noted that OSHA has a regulation specific to Telecommunications. It is 29 CFR 1910.268 OSHA - Telecommunications Standard. This is the applicable standard to be used. I have attached photographs of a tower in Nebraska that illustrates climbing facilities through flat light sector frames which are located close vertically to each other. Based on the standard of practice shown in the photographs and an open space of nearly seven feet (7'), it would appear there is adequate space to install a Flat Light Sector Frame that can support the proposed antennas. It is our belief that the items (ladder, pipe masts and dish antenna) described in Mr. Moglino's letter would not hinder service. In our previous submittal we recommended "that propagation maps, utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, be provided at those heights. (We would like to see the maps at -85dBm and -95dBm) We would also recommend that the industry describe in detail by the person preparing the maps, any differences at those heights, in particular the 97'6" height, for coverage versus the coverage at the proposed 110'3" height. (If provided, it is imperative that we are able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage described by the applicant.) There were no additional propagation maps submitted as requested. We can thus only assume that there is no significant difference in coverage at 97.6 feet, versus the coverage at the proposed 110'3" height and that 97.6 feet would provide the needed coverage. In light of the foregoing, we cannot confirm the need to extend the existing structure to accommodate a new wireless telecommunications facility at this location. We need a resolution to this issue to complete our review and provide comments for the Board to make an informed decision. As such, we believe that the application material as provided is incomplete. If you require anything further please give me a call at (518)439-3079. CMS CCl Martin Finnegan (via e-mail) Heather Lanza (via email) A1 Tagliaferri (via e-mail) Attachments 3 Purchase Order Date TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 23O57 November 3, 2011 Tax Exempt # A163554 Account # B 8020 4 500 500 IDeliver and send billing to: Department PLANNTNG BOARD Address IVendor 3321 Richard A. Comi d/b/a Center foc Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Dr. NY 12077 Glenmont, VENDOR "Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment'' ITEM QUANTITY MetroP~ 21851 DESCRIPTION UNIT COST Applic. 9.1 TOTAL NOT TO EXCEEi ,8,500. THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE IN THE AP~ED Dept. Head I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST Submission }Vithout a Cover Letter Comments: AGREEMENT This agreement made and entered into this ~J¢~ day of ~J~.~o-~¢' 2011 by and between RICHARD A. COMI d/b/a THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS (herein after referred to as Consultant) (mailing address: 70 Cambridge Drive, Glenmont, New York 12077) party of the first part, and THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NY 11971 (hereinafter referred to as Client) (mailing address; Town Hall Annex 54375 SR 25 Southold, NY 11971) party of the second part. Consultant and Client, for the consideration named, hereby agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE Client hereby retains Consultant for the purpose of assisting, advising and representing the Client on matters relating to reviewing and analyzing a wireless application for MetmPCS for a proposed facility at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue, received by client for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. 2. SPECIFIC SERVICES: SERVICES DURING PROCESSING OF THE APPLICATION The Consultant shall furnish appropriate Wireless Telecommunications Facilities siting assistance and advice to the Client and Client officials involved in the processing of the MetmPCS application for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, and, in connection therewith, shall: a) review the application filed with the Client for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, b) assist and advise the Client in the analysis of the application, to include attending meetings with the Applicants and/or Client officials as required, c) recommend in wdting to the Client whether the application should be approved or disapproved, and set forth in wdting the masons for such approval or disapproval, d) inspect the construction of the facility and in wdting recommend when/if the certificate of compliance should be issued. TIMES AND ATTENDANCE: COOPERATION BY CLIENT Consultant shall perform the services described heroin in as expeditious a manner as is reasonably possible and with due consideration of the time requirements of Client. Client recognizes that the timing of the performance of Consultant's services may be affected by previous commitments to other clients (including the delivery of promised services and work product and previously scheduled meetings), and situations normally and traditionally deemed to be matters of a fome majeure nature, including those influenced by the weather, strikes, or power outages. Client agrees to cooperate with Consultant, as needed, and to provide Consultant with copies of any records, documents and other information needed for the fulfillment of this agreement on a timely basis. Client further agrees to provide Consultant with access to apprepdate officials and/or employees of Client, as may be needed in the fulfillment of the agreement. Moreover, both parties understand and agree that mutual accountability and responsiveness is critical to the successful completion of the project, and therefore both shall always make their best faith efforts to be accountable and promptly responsive to each other. 4. COMPENSATION In payment for the services to be performed hereunder by Consultant, Client shall make payments to the Consultant as follows: A) The Client shall pay Consultant its normal published houdy rate (which at the date of this agreement is $250.00 per hour) for each hour of time devoted by Consultant to the performance of such services, provided, however, that for time traveling by Consultant in conjunction with the performance of such services, the Client shall pay Consultant 50% of the Consultants normal published rate. It is understood that the costs for all services, including expenses as covered below, will not exceed $8,500.00 for the pdmary carrier on the new facility, without additional approval from the Client. B) Consultant shall invoice the Client regularly, but no less frequently than monthly, after services have been performed, for any compensation payable. Such invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt, but in no case later than thidy (30) days. C) In the event that the Client disputes or objects to any portion of any invoice submitted by Consultant pursuant to this agreement, Client shall, within fifteen (15) days of the receipt of such invoice, notify Consultant in wdting of such dispute or objection. D) Payments made by the Client more than thirty (30) days following the date of submission of an invoice shall incur a charge of one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) of the amount thereby deemed late, compounded monthly, until the amount due and owing by the Client is paid in full. 5. REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES For services performed hereunder, Client shall reimburse Consultant, for out-of-pocket expenses for the following items: (a) Travel-related costs such as airfam, car rental, night lodging accommodations and meals consumed while on-site or enreute; (b) Expedited or overnight delivery service; (c) Any other reasonably necessary expenses directly related and attributable to the fulfillment of this agreement. Consultant's requests for expense reimbursement shall be included in Consultant's invoice at actual cost, with no markup. 6. STATUS OF CONSULTANT Consultant and Client agree that in the performance of Consultant's services hereunder, Consultant shall not be deemed to be an employee of Client for any purpose whatsoever, nor act under Color of State. 7. NOTICES Any and all notices, invoices, and payments required hereunder shall be addressed to the parties at their respective addresses set forth in page 1 hereof, or to such other address as may hereafter be designated in writing by either party hereto. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT This agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the Laws of the State of New York. 9. COMPLETE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION Them am no terms, conditions or obligations other than those contained herein, and there are no wdtten or verbal statements or representations, warranties or agreements with respect to this Agreement that have not been embodied heroin. This agreement constitutes the complete understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No modification or amendment of any provisions of this agreement shall be valid unless in writing and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Consultant and Client by individuals duly authorized to do so, have signed this agreement, the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT By: ~.(~.~ (electronic signature) R.A.Comi The Center for Municipal Solutions By: CLIENT Heather Lanza Title: Planning Director Town of Southold (printed) Lanza, Heather From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Lanza, Heather Friday, November 04,2011 10:34 AM dick@telecomsoLcom Randolph, Linda; Cummings, Brian Purchase Orders are delayed Dick, Our Purchase Orders and official written go-ahead on the two Metro PCS applications you have (Cutchogue - .lunge co- location and Mattituck Elijah's Lane co-location) been delayed due to being short-staffed. We have the consultant fees held in our deferred revenue account, we just haven't been able to process the paperwork. Please consider this e-mail written approval to go ahead and work on both applications. For Elijah's Lane in Mattituck co-location we need a similar completeness review like you did for the one in Cutchogue just recently. We would like to be able to report to the Planning Board on whether it is complete at their November 14® work session. On the Cutchogue co-location application, as we discussed on the phone yesterday, we also would like a short report on the materials submitted in response to our asking them to prove why they can't use the gap in the existing pole on the application in Cutchogue in time for our November 14th work session. Let us know if we should continue to find the application "incomplete" and if so, why is it better to do that than to find it complete and then require they submit additional information. Also, should I be copying Al Tagliaferri on these emails? Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza(a¢town sot thc) d ny t s lNG BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 October 27, 2011 Mr. Richard A. Comi 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re: Proposed Site Plan for MetmPCS New York, LLC at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: LI Dear Mr. Comi: I enclose for your information a copy of the October 27, 2011 letter from the agent and related attachments regarding the above-referenced site plan/special exception proposal. ' Please provide us with your estimate (not to exceed $8,500) as technical consultant for this project. Linda Randolph Secretarial Assistant Encs. Rg, NIELSEN, HUBER & GOUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ,klO NORTH NEW YORK ~VENIlE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK I 174L~ TELEPHONE: (61~1) 495-4100 FAGSlMILE: (O~l) 425-4104 October 27. 2011 BY HAND l'own of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Atm.: Brian A. Cammings, Planner OCT 2 7 Dll MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Pending Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCTM#: 1000-96 1 19.1 Dear Mr. Cummings: As .xou knov,, we represent MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS') with regard to its pending application to colocate at the existing public utility wireless telecommunications facility at the sa[2iect property. This correspondence shall serve as MetroPCS' response to those items noted in your correspondence of September 19, 2011 (copy attached hereto). The numerical order is rcflcctive of those numbered items in your correspondence. We enclosc herewith MetroPCS New York, LLC check number 7624 in the amount of $6,000, payable to the Town of Southold. Said amount represents the remaining balance of thc technical consultant's review fee of $8,500 to be held in escrow, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74(4)(a). However, same is submitted under protest, since, as set forth io oar correspondence of August 12, 2011, we believe that the $8,500 consultant fee amount set fbrth in the Town Code, at Section 280-74A(4) is illegal and unreasonable with respect to this co-location application. Enclosed please find three (3) counterparts of the correspondence of Leu Moglino, A1A, of MTM Design Group, Inc., dated September 30, 2011, addressing the proposed lighting pursuant to Town Code Section 172.5. 3. t£oclosed please find three (3) counterparts of the correspondence of Leu Moglino, AIA, ;Town of Southold Plalming MetroPCS Site Plan/Special Exception Application at 21855 C.R. 48 October 27, 2011 Page 2 of 2 of MTM Design Group, Inc., dated October 20, 2011, addressing the 97'6" height location on the existing pole and certifying that MetroPCS' installation at or near that space is not feasible. At this time, we submit that the Site Plan Application is complete, and we respectfully request that the Public Hearing be scheduled for the next available date. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you lbr your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RI~7, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: J 1( :mk I inclosures cc w/o encls.: Heather Lanza, Planning Director (via email) PI?4~NING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH Ill DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 September 19, 2011 John Coughlin, Esq. cio Rd, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Site Plan for MetroPCS at Junge 21855 CR. 48, Cutchogue SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: I am writing as a follow-up to the Work Session held on September 13, 2011, where the Planning Board found the above-referenced site plan application incomplete. The application cannot be accepted for full review until the following requirements are met and submitted directly to the Planning Department: A Technical Consultant Fee of $8,500 to be held in escrow, pursuant to §280- 74(4)(a) of the Southold Town Code. A total of $2,500 has been received; please submit the difference of $6,000. 2. Submit a photometric plan for all proposed lighting pursuant to §172 of the Southold Town Code. Pursuant to §280-71 Required Approvals, this proposed wireless facility requires Special Exception Approval by the Planning Board because it does not comply with the General Requirements for all wireless communication facilities as listed in §280-70. In particular, the proposed antennas are set at a height that exceeds the maximum allowable height for this zoning district. As described in §280-73 Special Exception Approval, the Planning Board must find that the proposed modification of the existing facility is a public necessity, and that there are compelling reasons which make it more feasible to construct Metro PCS at Jun,qe Pa,qe Two September 19, 2011 the proposed rather than any alternative available. Further, the Planning Board must find that the proposed is at the lowest height above the ground feasible to achieve the service needs of the carrier, and that the rationale behind the explanation from the applicant must be corroborated by an independent consultant hired by the Town. Other considerations include, but are not limited to, ensuring that the applicant has maximized the design characteristics to reduce visual impacts and obtrusiveness. Pursuant to §280-74 C(14), the Planning Board has deemed the following additional information necessary to complete the application and assess compliance with this article: a. Provide written evidence that the 97'6" height location that appears vacant on the existing monopole is not available because the space is already leased to another carrier (according to your statement at the Work Session). Please provide a copy of the lease. b. Provide written documentation and specific details explaining that the 97'6" height location that appears vacant on the existing monopole is not available because of interference that would occur with other antennas (according to your statement at the Work Session), c. Provide propagation maps, utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, at 97'6", and comparing that height with the proposed 110'3" height. We would like to see the maps at -85dBm and -95dBm. We must be able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage between the proposed height and 97'6". d. Provide a written detailed description, by the preparers of the propagation maps, explaining the differences in coverage between the 97'6" height, and the proposed 110'3" height. The applicant must provide this additional information to demonstrate that the existing location on the monopole is not sufficient, and proving that the additional height is necessary. If a. and/or b. above are proven to the satisfaction of the Planning Board, then c. and d. will not be necessary. The above information is vital to completing our review so that the Planning Board can make an informed decision and ensure the proposed meets the requirements of the Town Code. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Brian A. Cummings Planner DESIGN GROUP] ARCH ITECTURE ENGINEERING · PO BOX 3 · HAZLET, NEW.JERSEY 07730 · TEL: 732 888 6210 · FAX: 732 847 4335 · September 30, 2011 Brian A. Cummings Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue District: t000, Section: 96, Block: 1, Lot: 19,1 Metro PCS#: NY7314 MTM#: 09MPSTS014 Dear Mr. Cummings, As the Architecture & Engineering firm that designed the proposed installation for MetroPCS at 21855 CR 48, please accept this letter in regards to the proposed lighting at the site. The site shall contain (1) one work light, RACO model 5818-5 (or approved equal), mounted above the proposed PTC cabinet. The new lighting will be in accordance with all requirement of §1725 of the Southold Town Code, Standards for Exterior Lighting. This work light is a dual lamp holder for use with 75-100 PAR 38 bulbs, which have a light output of 1260 lumens. Though a photometric plan is not available for the proposed light, per §172.5 (4) of the town code, the light will remain under the maximum 1600 lumens level and will be mounted 8 feet above grade level. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CC: MetroPCS John J. Coughlin / Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP File 5818-5 -- Rectangular Box & Lamp Kit Gray Box~ cover & (2) lampholders Gray - Boxed Prcduct Specifications Product Type i Light Kits Product Family I Bell Specialty Boxes, Covers and Kits Rectangular Light Product Usage I[Lamps Kits for 75 - 150 WeE par 38 Color [ Gray Package Type -[Boxed Standard [ 4 Package WT. PER HU. I ~97.5 Ship Carton [-108125 -- Length [ Ship Carton [ 625 Width Ship Carton [ 88125 Height Ctn Cube [ 595 5 Ctn Weight ] 79 pallet Q~anti~ [-448 Inner Leaf 2 of $ 150050169581853 UPC Number 050169581858 Catalog PDF PDF Catalog Page Page Product Datasheet -- 5818 5 · Each kit is a complete weatherproof installation - no need to purchase separate components · Each kit includes easy t~follow multi-lingual instructions Compl.~nces UL Standard ~98 I of 2 9/30/20ll I1 19AM 2of2 9/30/2011 11 19AM DESIGN GROUP5 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING · PO BOX 3 · HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 · TEL: 732 888 6210 · FAX: 732 847 4335 · October 20, 2011 Brian A. Cummings Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 District: 1000, Section: 96, Block: 1, Lot: 19.1 Metro PCS#: NY7314 MTM#: 09MPSTS014 Dear Mr. Cummings, As the Architecture & Engineering firm that designed the proposed installation for MetroPCS at 21855 County Road 48, please accept this letter in regards to the antenna height in question. There is vacant space on the existing monopole at the 97'-6' elevation, however, there are obstructions that would prevent MetroPCS from installing antennas at this location. Although the existing antennas above are located at 104~-0'' centerline, the platform to which they are attached is mounted at 100'-0". Given the height of the proposed MetroPCS antennas, there would be a maximum of 3" between the top of the antennas and the bottom of the existing platform above, which would be insufficient from a construction standpoint if they should be mounted in this vacant space on the pole. Besides the limited space between equipment, there are also physical obstructions that would prevent the MetrePCS antennas from being installed at 97'-6". There is an existing ladder for access to the existing platform that hangs approximately 5' below, into the vacant space. Additionally, there are also existing pipe masts and a dish antenna mounted to the platform above, which extend below into the vacant space. The obstructions noted above can be seen in the photos on the following page. At the 97'-6" elevation, these obstructions combined with the tight space between the existing platform and top of the proposed MetroPCS antennas, cause concern for proper installation. There are also OSHA standards and regulations that would prevent the installation of the antennas in the open space in question. Per OSHA regulations, Standards - 29 CFR, '1926 Subpart M, Fall Protection; procedures have been designed to prevent employees from falling off, onto, or through working levels. Some of these regulations are explained under the 'Personal Fall Arrest Systems' section, but one in particular that would have an impact here is as stated below. These consist of an anchorage, connectors, and a body belt or body harness and may include a deceleration device, lifeline, or suitable combinations. If a personal fall arrest system is used for fall protection, it must do the following: Be rigged so that an employee can neither free fail more than 6 feet (1.8 meters) nor contact any lower level; OSHA regulations also exist for fixed ladders and can be found in the OSHA 3124-12R 2003 guide. Some of these standards are as noted below. Minimum perpendicular clearance between fixed ladder rungs, cleats, and steps and any obstruction behind the ladder must be 7 inches ('I Scm) Minimum perpendicular clearance between the centerline of fixed ladder rungs, cleats and steps, and any obstruction on the climbing side of the ladder must be 30 inches (76 cm), If obstructions are unavoidable, clearance may be reduced to 24 inches (61 cra), provided a deflection device is installed to guide workers around the obstruction. Based on the additional issues listed above, the proposed installation at or near 97'-6" is not feasible. Shou~v~ A~Iy~uestions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CC; MetroPCS John J. Coughlin / Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP File Southold Town Plannin,q Board Work Session - September 26, 2011 - Pa,qe Two Location: i West side of Hobart Road a rox 1 059 feet north of Ter Ln Southo d Description: ~ This standard subdivision is to subdivide 2.32 acres into two lots where i L0t !..=..~3 2!3 s:f. ar~d..!~ot. 2 = 57 809 s f n the R-40 Zon ng D str ct Status: : Conditional Preliminary Approval Action: Review Final Map.~. C& Rs and D~ainage. Easeme.nt~ :. ~i~h~i~ii~ii .iii~,..C & Rs D.~a.nage Easement L0cationl ~'5 Cox Large, Cutch0g~e ......... : Description: Proposal for a transfer station for construction demolition, scrap metal, damaged cars; dismantling with shipping off site, refrigerators, stoves, wood, aluminum; parking of sanitation trucks, trucks, cars and dumps~rs: ~ Status: ExPired S!~e.P!a.n ............. Action: ............Review. Town E~!g.inee.[,.s comme nts: ................. Attachmentsl TOWn Eng.ineer's C0.mmen[s .............. Location: i 222' +/- east of Cox Lane & Oregon Road, Cutchogue . agricultural storage building to a wine-tasting room and dry storage building, and includes a 10,427 s.f. bluestone parking lot and a 1,440 s.f. Status: Pending Action: : Review revised s te 13 an Location: 11780 Sound Avenue in Mattituck (38'x78' plus a 38' x 6' porch overhang) with approximately 2,191 sq. ft. of warehouse, 773 sq. ft. of display area, 228 sq. ft. of porch and 773 sq. ff. of second floor office to be used as an office, warehouse/custom cabinet workshop on a 11,517.67 sq. ft. parcel in the LI Zone located apprc~x!mate!y 520' w(e..Pac~if~!c Street.on..th.e s!s(o~ Sound Aven.ue Slatus: APPr0~ed S!te..P.!an Pend!ng..FinaI nspec!.on ......... Action: Reviewcomments from Fina.!. !.nspection. Attachments i Staff Report For Discussion: MetroPCS at Junge, SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 - review of comments to ZBA G.W. Meade Farm, SCTM#1000-69-5-7.1 - concerns of neighbors Local Law re: Amendments to Section 280, Zoning, in Connection with Site Plan Approval Starting Time of Planning Board Work Sessions PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 September 19, 2011 John Coughlin, Esq. c/o R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Site Plan for MetroPCS at Junge 21855 CR. 48, Cutchogue SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: I am writing as a follow-up to the Work Session held on September 13,2011, where the Planning Board found the above-referenced site plan application incomplete. The application cannot be accepted for full review until the following requirements are met and submitted directly to the Planning Department: A Technical Consultant Fee of $8,500 to be held in escrow, pursuant to §280- 74(4)(a) of the Southold Town Code. A total of $2,500 has been received; please submit the difference of $6,000. 2. Submit a photometric plan for all proposed lighting pursuant to §172 of the Southold Town Code. Pursuant to §280-71 Required Approvals, this proposed wireless facility requires Special Exception Approval by the Planning Board because it does not comply with the General Requirements for all wireless communication facilities as listed in §280-70. In particular, the proposed antennas are set at a height that exceeds the maximum allowable height for this zoning district. As described in §280-73 Special Exception Approval, the Planning Board must find that the proposed modification of the existing facility is a public necessity, and that there are compelling reasons which make it more feasible to construct Metro PCS at Jun.qe PaRe Two September 19, 2011 the proposed rather than any alternative available. Further, the Planning Board must find that the proposed is at the lowest height above the ground feasible to achieve the service needs of the carrier, and that the rationale behind the explanation from the applicant must be corroborated by an independent consultant hired by the Town. Other considerations include, but are not limited to, ensuring that tJ~e applicant has maximized the design characteristics to reduce visual impacts and obtrusiveness. Pursuant to {}280-74 C(14), the Planning Board has deemed the following additional information necessary to complete the application and assess compliance with this article: a. Provide written evidence that the 97'6" height location that appears vacant on the existing monopole is not available because the space is already leased to another carrier (according to your statement at the Work Session). Please provide a copy of the lease. b. Provide written documentation and specific details explaining that the 97'6" height location that appears vacant on the existing monopole is not available because of interference that would occur with other antennas (according to your statement at the Work Session). c. Provide propagation maps, utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, at 97'6", and comparing that height with the proposed -~110~3" height. We would like to see the maps at -85dBm and -95dBm. We must be able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage between the proposed height and 97'6". d. Provide a written detailed description, by the preparers of the propagation maps, explaining the differences in coverage between the 97'6" height, and the proposed 110'3" height. The applicant must provide this additional information to demonstrate that the existing location on the monopole is not sufficient, and proving that the additional height is necessary. If a. and/or b. above are proven to the satisfaction of the Planning Board, then c. and d. will not be necessary. The above information is vital to completing our review so that the Planning Board can make an informed decision and ensure the proposed meets the requirements of the Town Code. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Brian A. Cummings Planner WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, September 12, 2011 4:00 p.m. Applications Location; NY~ R.~t~ ~,.~.r. eenp9rt Description: . Proposed expans on of the Peconic Landing retirement community. Status: Pre-submission Attachments: :: None Location: on a r.o.w, off of Oriental Avenue on F. I. Description: ~: This proposed lot line modification transfers 0.16 acres from SCTM#1000-10-11-5.1 to SCTM#1000-10-11-3. Lot 3 will increase from ~ 1.14 acres to 1.3 acres and Lot 5.1 will decrease from 2.01 acres to 1.85 acres. Status: Action i ~c~cppt for rev ew Attachments: ~ Staff RePort Location: on the north side of Orchard Street, approximately 1,008' west of Platt Road, in Orient Description: This standard subdivision of a 10-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 is :~ 1.5 acres and Lot 2 is 8.5 acres inclusive of a 2.5-acre building envelope and 6 acres of subd!vision open sp.~r~e.~ ~u~; Action: Attachments: Staff Report Description: Maj0r S.ubdMs!0n Of 27 lots on a 60:42:~{e.parcel. Status: Action: ' Review proposed second access road plans and C & Rs recently , submitted. Project name Metro PCS at Junge SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Locationi 2.!.85~ .~R.~!~. C~hog~e Description: ' This amended site plan is for a MetroPCS wireless co-location of ~ antennas on an existing 100'-5" monopole with a proposed pole ;; extension height of 8'6" in the LI Zoning District. AcC!om :,Review commen~s ~eview: Attachments , D[affCgmments Staff Repo~ (518)439-3079 THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE DRIVE GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX(518)478-0909 September 12, 2011 (via email and regular mail) Chairman Sidor and Planning Board Members Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, MY 11971 MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for a proposed wireless telecommunication facility Premises - 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Dear Chairman Sidor and Members of the Planning Board Members: Per Ms. Lanza's request of last week, we have reviewed the application materials submitted for the above referenced facility with cover letter dated August 12, 2011. We were requested to review the material in two areas; 1. RF Emissions and 2. Proof of Need to include the submitted propagation material. Upon review and discussions we offer the following comments: Pursuant to Town Code Article XVII, Section 280, wireless telecommunications facilities within the Town of Southold, NY, require a Special Exception Permit and Site Plan Approval. Here, the applicant proposes to install a wireless telecommunications facility by co-locating on the existing monopole located at 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY. The applicant proposes to install an 8'6" extension to the existing 100'5" (AGL) monopole and attach three (3) antenna sectors with two (2) antennas per sector to the extension, thereby increasing the actual height of the overall structure to a height of 112'6" (AGL). The associated equipment cabinets and related cables and hardware are proposed to be located within a secured screened equipment compound at the base of the structure. We find the Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report dated June 30, 2011 to be complete. We agree with the report that "the antenna emissions at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RE exposure." It should be noted that this report should be revised if the antenna model or height should change. As per the "Affidavit of Radio Frequency Engineer," provided with the application material, dated July 5,2011, and signed by Nicholas Balzano, it states in paragraph 16, that the next available height on the monopole is sixty feet (60). Signal propagation maps were also submitted showing proposed coverage at sixty feet (60) and the proposed height of one hundred and ten feet three inches (110'3"). We disagree with the statement that the next available height on the existing monopole is sixty feet (60). As per the construction drawings submitted with the application and signed and sealed by Luis Moglino (Registered NYS Architect #028992) of MTM Design Group, as noted on page A-3, there appears to be sufficient space available between 72'5" to 80', and 92' 11" to 102', to locate the proposed MetroPCS antennas, thereby eliminating the need to extend the structure. On page A-6 of same drawings, detail 3, Antenna Detail, the dimension for the proposed antennas are noted as 51.4" (inches). Antennas of that size could be mounted at centerline heights of approx. 76'3", or 97'6". At both locations the clearance between proposed and existing antennas above and below would not interfere with the service from the existing installations. Nowhere in the application material or Radio Frequency data provided, are either of these heights addressed or discussed. We strongly recommend that propagation maps, utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, be provided at those heights. (We would like to see the maps at - 85dBm and -95dBm) We would also recommend that the industry describe in detail by the person preparing the maps, any differences at those heights, in particular the 97'6" height, for coverage versus the coverage at the proposed 110'3" height. (If provided, it is imperative that we are able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage described by the applicant.) In light of the foregoing, we cannot confirm the need to extend the existing structure to accommodate a new wireless telecommunications facility at this location. We need the above information to complete our review and provide comments for the Board to make an informed decision. As such, we believe that the application material as provided is incomplete. If you require anything further please give me a call at (518)439-3079. Sincerely, Richard A. Comi CMS CC~ Martin Finnegan (via e-mail) Heather Lanza (via email) Al Tagliaferri (via e-mail) (518)439-3079 THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE DRIVE GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX (518)478-0909 September 12,2011 (via email and regular mail) Chairman Sidor and Planning Board Members Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, MY 11971 8EP 1 3 2011 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for a proposed wireless telecommunication facility Premises - 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Dear Chairman Sidor and Members of the Planning Board Members: Per Ms. Lanza's request of last week, we have reviewed the application materials submitted for the above referenced facility with cover letter dated August 12, 2011. We were requested to review the material in two areas; 1. RF Emissions and 2. Proof of Need to include the submitted propagation material. Upon review and discussions we offer the following comments: Pursuant to Town Code Article XVII, Section 280, wireless telecommunications facilities within the Town of Southold, NY, require a Special Exception Permit and Site Plan Approval. Here, the applicant proposes to install a wireless telecommunications facility by co-locating on the existing monopole located at 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY. The applicant proposes to install an 8'6" extension to the existing 100'5" (AGL) monopole and attach three (3) antenna sectors with two (2) antennas per sector to the extension, thereby increasing the actual height of the overall structure to a height of 112'6" (AGL). The associated equipment cabinets and related cables and hardware are proposed to be located within a secured screened equipment compound at the base of the structure. We find the Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report dated June 30, 2011 to be complete. We agree with the report that "the antenna emissions at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RE exposure." It should be noted that this report should be revised if the antenna model or height should change. As per the "Affidavit of Radio Frequency Engineer," provided with the application material, dated July 5, 2011, and signed by Nicholas Balzano, it states in paragraph 16, that the next available height on the monopole is sixty feet (60). Signal propagation maps were also submitted showing proposed coverage at sixty feet (60) and the proposed height of one hundred and ten feet three inches (110'3"). We disagree with the statement that the next available height on the existing monopole is sixty feet (60). As per the construction drawings submitted with the application and signed and sealed by Luis Moglino (Registered NYS Architect #028992) of MTM Design Group, as noted on page A-3, there appears to be sufficient space available between 72'5" to 80', and 92'11" to 102', to locate the proposed MetroPCS antennas, thereby eliminating the need to extend the structure. On page A~6 of same drawings, detail 3, Antenna Detail, the dimension for the proposed antennas are noted as 51.4" (inches). Antennas of that size could be mounted at centerline heights of approx. 76'3", or 97'6". At both locations the clearance between proposed and existing antennas above and below would not interfere with the service from the existing installations. Nowhere in the application material or Radio Frequency data provided, are either of these heights addressed or discussed. We strongly recommend that propagation maps, utilizing the same parameters as the maps already provided, be provided at those heights. (We would like to see the maps at - 85dBm and -95dBm) We would also recommend that the industry describe in detail by the person preparing the maps, any differences at those heights, in particular the 97'6" height, for coverage versus the coverage at the proposed 110'3" height. (If provided, it is imperative that we are able to discern on the maps provided any differences in coverage described by the applicant.) In light of the foregoing, we cannot confirm the need to extend the existing structure to accommodate a new wireless telecommunications facility at this location. We need the above information to complete our review and provide comments for the Board to make an informed decision. As such, we believe that the application material as provided is incomplete. If you require anything further please give me a call at (518)439-3079. Sincerely, j~. ~. ~td (electronic signature) Richard A. Comi CMS Martin Finnegan (via e-mail) Heather Lanza (via email) Al Tagliaferri (via e-mail) Augustl6,2011 518-439-3079 CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX: 518-478-0909 (via email and regular mail) Chairman Sidor and Planning Board Members Town of Sonthold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, MY 11971 Re: Southold NY MetroPCS 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue wireless application Dear Chairman Sidor and Planning Board members; Southold's Planning Director has asked that I respond to you concerning the accusations in the Lawrence Re' letter of August 12, 2011 concerning the above application, that CMS and I are not qualified to review the wireless application. My response to those unfounded accusations is as follows; 1. CMS is the largest wireless municipal consulting firm in the country working for hundreds of municipalities in over thirty (30) states. 2. We have reviewed over three thousand (3000) wireless applications. 3. I am a founder of that organization and have personally reviewed all aspects of hundreds of wireless applications. 4. I have testified on wireless application for hundreds of municipal boards and in Federal Court. 5. I have always been accepted as a wireless siting expert. 6. Concerning the accusation that I am not qualified as an RF Engineer, to the best of my knowledge there is no RF Engineering degree offered at any college in the country. (The industry merely gives the title of"RF engineer" to those that they have preparing propagation maps.). I have reviewed thousands of propagation maps and drive tests, which is the information provided by the industry to prove the need for their sites, l have discussed the modeling programs used by the carriers with their "engineers". I have more experience in this area than most industry employees. 7. Mr. Re' is correct when he says that I am not a New York state licensed architect, engineer, certified appraiser, or certified planner. My years of practical experience in all aspects of wireless siting have always qualified me as au expert in wireless siting. As far as Mr. Re's comment that having CMS involved will delay the processing and review of this application is simply not tree. CMS will complete its review and report of the application in ten (10) business days or less. Mr. Re's accusations are not true. We look forward to continuing our work with your Board on wireless applications. If you require anything further at this time please let me know. S in?n~e, ly, // /' l~ichard A. Comi CMS cc: Martin Finnegan (via email) Heather Lanza (via email) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 August 16, 2011 Mr. Richard A. Comi 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re~ Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS New York, LLC at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: LI Dear Mr. Comi: Enclosed herewith please find an application package, received August 15, 2011, regarding the above-referenced site plan/special exception proposal. The same package has also been sent to Al Tagliaferri, at your request. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, pB~iana~eCr ummings Encs. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 F~x: 631 765-3136 August 16, 2011 Mr. A1 Tagliaferri 75 South Riverside Ave Croton-On-Hudson, NY 10520 Re~ Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS New York, LLC at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19. I Zoning District: LI Dear Mr. Tagliaferri: As requested by Dick Comi, enclosed herewith please find an application package, received August 15, 2011, regarding the above-referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Brian Cummings Planner Encs. Rt , NIELSEN, HUBER ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPIIONE: (631) 425-4100 FAGSIMILE: (6131) 425-4104 August 12, 2011 BY HAND Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Ms. Heather Lanza, Planning Director RE: RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Reactivation of Pending Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCTM#: 1000- 96 1 19.1 Dear Ms. Lanza: As you know, we represent MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS') with regard to its pending application to colocate at the existing public utility ~vireless telecommunications facility at the subject property. MetroPCS' original Building Permit Application was filed with the Building Department on March 31, 2010 and a Notice of Disapproval was issued on April 21, 2010. MetroPCS' Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Applications were filed with your office on July 2, 2010. Itowever, in light of the enactment of Local Law No. 4 of 2010 and the amendments made therein to Town Code Article XVII addressing the zoning of "Wireless Communications Facilities," MetroPCS has modified its proposal and revised a number of documents to further comply with the Town's Code provisions. You will note that MetroPCS has reduced the height of the proposed pole extension from 12' to 8'6". On July 7, 2011, we submitted revised documentation with the Building Department, ho*vever, we were thereafter advised by the Building Department that an updated Notice of Disapproval was not required and would not be issued. Instead, we were directed to submit the revised supplemental filing requirements directly with your office to re-activate the pending Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Applications. Accordingly, with respect to the Site Plan Application, we submit herewith the following revised documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of amended Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application; 2. Original and one (1) copy of updated Environmental Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated August 11,2011, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(3); 3. Two (2) counterparts of updated LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting; Town of Southold Planning MetroPCS Site Plan/Special Exception Application August 12,2011 Page 2 of 4 4. Seven (7) counterparts of revised Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report of Pinnacle Telecom Group, dated June 30, 2011, demonstrating the project's compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280- 74C(6), 280-74B(l)(a) and 280-70(K); 5. Seven (7) counterparts of revised Structural Analysis Report, prepared by GPD Group, dated April 29, 2011, documenting the facility's structural compliance with local, state and federal codes pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(6), and 280-74B(1)(b); 6. Seven (7) sets of updated Gap and Propagation Maps, dated June 17, 2011, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74B(1)(d) and (e), and 280-74D(4); 7. Seven (7) counterparts of updated RF Affidavit of Nicholas Balzano, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(1 ) and 280-74B(1 )(e); 8. Two (2) counterparts of updated Visual Analysis, prepared by EBI Consulting, revision dated August 4, 2011, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(3); 9. Nine (9) sets of revised Zoning Drawings, including Site Plan, Vicinity Plan and Elevation Drawings, prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc., revision 1, dated May 18, 2011, addressing Town Code Sections 280-74C(4), 280-74C(5), 280-74C(9), 280-74C(10), 280-74C(12), 280- 74C(13) and 280-133A(4); 10. One (1) CD Rom containing digital shapefiles of updated gap and propagation maps and search ring map, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(7) and 280-74B(1)(f); 11. Two (2) sets of revised Construction Drawings, representing "Amhitectural Review Materials," prepared by MTM Design Group, lnc., revision 4, dated May 18, 2011. (Please note these drawings are on file with the Building Department as well); and 12. Two (2) signed and sealed copies of updated correspondence of MTM Design Group, Inc., dated September 7, 2010~ regarding Grading & Drainage information. With regard to the 5~ecial Exception Permit Application, we submit the following revised documents: 1. Two (2) copies of amended Town of Southold Planning Board Special Exception Permit Application; 2. Two (2) copies of amended Building Permit Application*, pursuant to Town Code Section 280- 74D(I)(a). *(Again, please note that we submitted the amended Building Permit Application with the Building Department on July 7,2011 but were thereafter advised by the Building Department that a new Notice of Disapproval would not be issued); 3. Two (2) copies of amended Site Plan Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280- 74D(1 )(b); 4. Original and one (1) copy of updated Colocation Affidavit of Dan Olmetti regarding future co- location, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(2); and 5. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Nicholas Balzano regarding good faith effort and site alternatives considered pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74D(1)(c), 280-74D(4) and 280- 70D. The gap and propagation maps listed above further satisfy the requirements of Town Code Section 280-74D(4). We have not submitted additional Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Application fee checks as same were submitted with our original application in 2010 (MetroPCS Check No. 5542 in the sum of $1,000 and Check No. 5543 in the sum of $1,000). In addition, please note that copies of all other Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Application filing requirements, including Applicant's Affidavit, Applicant's Transactional Disclosure Form, Owner's Transactional Disclosure Form, Owner's Authorization Affidavit, MetroPCS' FCC License, FAA Determination of No }lazard to Air Navigation, Deed, Lease, 1'own of Southold Planning MetroPCS Site Plan/Special Exception Application August 12,201l Page 3 of 4 photographs of existing structures, property surveys, and copy of Notice of Disapproval, are on file with your office and are not impacted by the modified design; accordingly, those items have not been revised. Should you require any additional copies or further information, please advise. Lastly, please note that we have enclosed herewith MetroPCS Check No. 7243 in the sum of $2,500.00, which sum represents the technical consultant's review fee to be held in escrow. We respectfully submit that the $8,500 consultant fee amount set forth in the Town's Code, at §280-74A(4) is illegal under New York State and Federal la~v and is unreasonable with respect to this co-location application. MetroPCS does not contest that the Town has the authority to request that the applicant pay for fees for technical experts for applications that are highly technical in nature. Moy v. Board of Town Trustees, 61 A. D. 3d 763 (2d Dept. 2009). However, this application presents no such highly technical issues. Additionally, the Town Code separately requires MetroPCS to pay a Building Permit Application fee to the Building Department, in the sum of $500.00, and also to pay application fees for Site Plan Approval, in the sum of $1,000.00, and Special Exception Permit, in the sum of $1,000.00. 1! is has long been held in New York that "where a license or permit fee is imposed under the power to regulate, the amount charged cannot be greater than a sum reasonably necessary to cover the costs of issuance, inspection and enforcement" and "to the extent that the fees charged are exactly for revenue purposes or to offset the cost of general governmental functions they are invalid as an unauthorized tax". Torsoe Brothers Construction Corp. v Board of Trustees of Inc. Village of Monroe, 49 A.D. 2d 461,464 (3d Dept. 1975). The $8,500.00 consultant fee and other fees described above should be contrasted to the application fees charged to non wireless telecommunications applications in the Town of Southold, which are often more complicated and more technical in nature than the instant application. Moreover, we believe the $8,500.00 consultant fee is unreasonable and illegal under federal law. For example, the Southern District of New York, Judge Stephen C. Robinson found this exact amount to be unreasonable and illegal. MetroPCS New York, LLC v. The City of Mount Vernon, 09 Civ. 8348 (S.D.N.Y., 2010). A copy of Judge Robinson's Opinion and Order is enclosed herewith. In that matter, MetroPCS sought a Special Use Permit to colocate with other carries on an existing structure. The City of Mount Vemon's Code required the payment of an $8,500.00 consultant fee. The City of Mount Vernon retained Richard Comi ("Comi") and The Center for Municipal Solutions ("CMS") as its consultant. The Town of Southold likewise uses Comi and CMS as its consultant. Judge Robinson held that the City of Mount Vemon's assessment of fees was unreasonable, citing, among other applicable cases, Synagogue v. Roslyn Harbor, 40 N.Y.2d 158, 352 N.E.2d 115,386 N.Y.S.2d 198 (1976). Ultimately, on this point, the Court held that the fee provisions contained in the City's Code were unlawful because they failed to limit the amount of fees assessed, and because such fees were unjustifiably and peculiarly excessive with respect to applications for wireless telecommunications facilities. The Court determined that MetroPCS was entitled to a disgorgement of the consulting fees assessed, and struck down related portions of the City's (ode. In doing so, the Court stated at page 29 of its Opinion and Order as follows: "Defendant has not presented any evidence explaining why it is more labor-intensive or time-intensive to review a special permit for wireless telecommunications facility... This is particularly true when MetroPCS submitted an application that was almost identical to three others already approved by the City and presumably would not have required that much additional work on the City's part. The Court is also concerned that there is no limitation on the amount of consulting fees that the applicant could be required to pay. The City of Town of Southold Planning Board MetroPCS Site Plan/Special Exception Application August 12,2011 Page 4 of 4 Mount Vernon has unlimited discretion to charge a wireless carrier prohibitive fees by simply dragging out the process and utilizing consultants for its convenience - rather than out of necessity." Furthermore, we believe the Town's retention of CMS and Comi as its consultant is inappropriate for the review of this application. Comi is not a New York state licensed architect, engineer, certified appraiser, or certified planner. Furthermore, Comi is not qualified as an RF Engineer.t Accordingly, MetroPCS objects to the Town's retention of CMS and Comi, as such retention will delay the processing and review of this application. Furthermore, MetroPCS disputes Comi's qualifications to serve as a technical expert. MetroPCS does not consent to the application of any funds in escrow for the payment of fees to CMS or Comi or any technical consultant until a detailed invoice for technical consultant services is provided to us and it is determined that the services provided are reasonable and that the services provided actually involved technical services outside the scope and capabilities of the Town's well qualified Planning and Building Department staff'. According, we respectfully request that the Town accept this reasonable escrow submission and provide detailed invoices of any tasks billed against said funds. Very truly yours, RI~, ~UBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By,: Lawrence C. R~ LCR:mk Enclosures Martin Finnegan, Town Attorney I The Ady 29, 2010, Transcript of Proceedings in MetroPCS New York, LLC v. The City o/'Mount ~/ernon, 09-Civ. 8348, be./bre Judge Stephen C. Robinson, U.S.D.d for the Southern District of New York is enclosed as an example of recent testimony from Comi where he acknowledged that he is not a licensed /~r~fessional engineer, a licensed New York State architect, a certified planner, or RF engineer. A copy of lhe Court's decision is also enclosed. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 1, 2010 Lawrence C. R6, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington NY 11743 Re: Metro PCS at A. Junge, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1 - 19. I Dear Mr. R6: I am writing in response to your submission received in connection with the above-referenced application. The Planning Department is currently reviewing the application for completeness before a full review can begin. As mentioned above, in order for the application to be deemed "complete" and ready for review and analysis, the Town of Southold requires payment in the amount of $8,500 (payable to the Town of Southold) to be placed into an escrow account to cover the cost of the technical consultant's review. The technical consultant's review fee is required by Southold Town Code §280-74A(d). Any unused portion of the technical consultant's fee will be returned to you. Once the above-referenced and required fee has been received, formal review of this application will begin by the Planning staff, the technical consultant, the Southold Town Planning Board, and all other interested and involved Southold Town departments and outside agencies. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment and we look forward to the continued review of this application. Sincere._~yl, Martin H. Sidor cc: Southold Town Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Kristy Winser, Senior Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southald, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 8, 2010 Mr. Richard A. Comi 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re: Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS New York, LLC at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: LI Dear Mr. Comi: Enclosed herewith please find an application package and CD regarding the above- referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Kristy Win~r Senior Planner Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLL~M J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 8, 2010 Ms. Denise S. Benun 16 Drake Lane Manhasset, NY 11030 Re~ Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS New York, LLC at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zoning District: Lt Dear Ms. Benun: Enclosed herewith please find an application package and CD regarding the above- referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Senior Planner Encls. cc: R~.chard Com~_ NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 30 NORTH NEW YORK AVRI~UE FACSIMILE: (031) 425-4104 July 2, 2010 BY HAND Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7314) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCTM#: 1000-96 1 19.1 Dear Ms. Winser: On behalf of MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS' hereafter), submitted herewith are the captioned Applications as follows: With respect to thc Site Plan Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application; 2. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Affidavit; 3. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Transactional Disclosure Form; 4. Original and one (1) copy of Owner's Transactional Disclosure Form; 5. Two (2) counterparts of Owner's Authorization Affidavit; 6. Original and one (1) copy of Environmental Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated May 14, 2010, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(3); 7. Original and one (1) copy of LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting; 8. MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 5542 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the fee for modification, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(2)(a); 9. Seven (7) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group and dated March 29, 2010, demonstrating the project's compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations and providing Town of Southold Planning BlYard MetroPCS Site Plan/Special Exception Application July 2, 2010 Page 2 of 3 information on the other carriers already located on the facility in accordance with Town Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(6), 280-74B(1)(a) and 280-70J; 10. Seven (7) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report prepared by GPD Associates, and dated March 8, 2010, documenting the facility's structural compliance with local, state and federal codes pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(6), and 280- 74B(l)(b); 11. Seven (7) counterparts of MetroPCS's FCC License pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(c); 12. Seven (7) counterparts of FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(2), and 280-74B(1)(c); 13. Seven (7) copies of Gap and Propagation Maps, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74B(1)(d) and (e); 14. Seven (7) copies of Search Ring Map, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280- 74B(1)(e); 15. Seven (7) copies of Affidavit of Radiofrequency Engineer, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(e); 16. Seven (7) copies of Deed, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1 ) and 280-74B(1)(g); 17. Seven (7) copies of the Communication Site License Agreement, between MetroPCS New York, LLC, and Arthur V. Junge, pursuant to Code 280-74C(1) and 280-74B(l)(g): 18. Two (2) counterparts of Visual Analysis, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated May 4, 2010, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(3); 19. Nine (9) sets of Zoning Drawings, including Site Plan, Vicinity Plan and Elevation Drawings, prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc., dated June 4, 2010, addressing Town Code Sections 280-74C(4), 280-74C(5), 280-74C(9), 280-74C(10), 280-74C(12), 280- 74C(13) and 280-133A(4); 20. One (1) CD Rom containing digital files of propagation and search ring maps, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(7) and §280-74B(1)(f); 21. Two (2) sets of Photos of Existing Structures pursuant to Town Code Section 280- 74C(8); 22. Two (2) sets of Construction Drawings, representing "Amhitectural Review Materials," prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc., dated March 19, 2010. (Please note these drawings are on file with the Building Department as well); 23. Two (2) signed and sealed copies of correspondence of MTM Design Group, Inc., dated June 23, 2010, regarding Grading & Drainage information; and 24. Four (4) copies of Property Survey, prepared by Arek Surveying Company, dated June 4, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(5). With regard to the Special Exception Permit Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Wireless Facility Special Exception Application; 2. MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 5543 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the Special Exception Application fee, pursuant to Town Code Section 280- 74A(3); Town of Southold Planning IJ~ard MetroPCS Site Plan/Special Exception Application July 2. 2010 Page 3 of 3 3. Two (2) copies of Building Department Notice of Disapproval, dated April 21, 2010, and Building Permit Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(1)(a); 4. Two (2) copies of Site Plan Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(1)(b); 5. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Richard Mohr regarding future co-location, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(2); and 6. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Nicholas Balzano regarding good faith effort and site alternatives considered pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74D(1)(c), 280- 74D(2), and 280-74D(4). Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: n J J C/m k Enclosures 0 0 0 © Z 0 0 Town of Southold Site ID NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Map Scale: 1" = 0.85 mi Feb. 04,2010 Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites MAP 1 Existing Coverage Prepared by Nico Balzano ~R~:SCENT W Town of Southold Site ID NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Map Scale: 1" = 0.85 mi Feb. 04,20~J0 Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites -85 dBm in Building Residential MAp 2 Coverage from Subject Site Prepared by Nico Balzano Town of Southold Site ID NY7314A 2'~855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites Map Scale: 1" = 0.85 mi -75 dBm in Building Commercial Feb. 04,2010 MAP 3 Coverage From Subject Site Prepared by Nic~ Balzano ~RESCENT W Town of ~,~,~ ~, Town Boundaries ® Subject Site Site ID NY7314A MAP 4 21855 County Road 48 · Proposed Sites Cutchogue, New York ~ Coverage From Map Scale: t" = 0.85 mi ~ -95 dBm In Vehicle Subject Site Feb. 04,20t0 Prepared by Nico Balzano MetroP£ S Ney, F~rk, LL£ 2la55 Cmmty Road 48, Culc!~og~ et NY NY7314 Search Ring 0 mi 0.2 0,4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 of 21855 County Road 48 Subject Site Southold Cutchogue, New York ~ -85 dBm In Building Residential © I~AP 1 Town Site tD NY7314A ~ -75 dBm II1 building Commercial Of 21855 County Road 48 Southold Cutchogue, New York ~ -85 dBm in Building Residential Subject Site Proposed Sites On Air Sites MAP 2 and Subject Site Nico ealzano TOWn ~if~ ID I~Y7.314A -75 dBm In building Co~me ¢ a Town Boundaries ~ffj~.~l of 21855 CountYa NewROadyork48 ~ ~ss dsm 1~1 Building ResideatJal C3 Subject Sim MAP 3 Southold Cutcho~ue, G Proposed Sites Coverage from On Air Sites Prepared by Town of Southold Site ID NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue. New York MAP i Subject Site Proposed Sites Town Of Site ID NY7314A $outhold 21855 County Road 48 -~5 dBra In Building Residential Cutchogue. New York June 17, 2011 MAP 2 Subject Site Town of Southold June 17, 2011 Site ID NY73'~4A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Map Scale: 1" = 0.6580 mi Subject Site MAP 3 TOWN of Southold Site ID NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue. New York Town Boundaries Subject Site Proposed Sites On Air Sites MAP 4 Coverage from Subject Site On Air Sites ~nd proposed Sites Prepared by Nice Balzano of Site ID NY7314A ~ ~ Town Boundaries Southold 21855 County Road 48 -85 dBm tt] 8uildi~g Residential C} Subject Site MAP 5 Cutchogue, New York ~ Proposed Sites On Air 8ires a~d proposed Sites of Site tD NY7314A Town Boundaries ~' Southold 21855 County Road 48 85 dBm In Buddlng Residentia O Subject Site MAP 6 Town of $outhold Site ID NY7314A 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Subject Site Proposed Sites MAP 7 Town of Southo~d June 17, 2011 Site ID NY7314A Cutchogue, New York Subject Site MAP 8 Proposed Sites Planner's Report: Proposed metroPCS Telecommunications Facility Located at: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York Cutchogue CDP, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, Long Island, NY November 2011 Pmpamd by David Karlebach, PP, PC 38 E. Ridgewood Avenue #396 Ridgewood, NJ 07450 David Karlebach, AICP, PP Introduction The purpose of this planning study is to assess the existing character and visual quality of the area surrounding the Project Site, and examine any potential adverse visual impacts that may occur. A conclusion is offered concerning the impacts on the character of the neighborhood or on the environmental conditions of the area. Existing Land Use The Project Site is located on a nearly rectangular 1.05-acre tract of land identified as Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 as shown on the Town of Southold tax assessment maps. The Project Site is located along County Road 48 (Middle Road) in Cutchogue, approximately 3,000 feet north of the old Cutchogue Station. Access to the site is achieved via County Road 48. The site is improved with a one-story metal building with associated parking and utilities. The building is occupied by All Star Auto Repairs. Used auto sales also occur on the property. A 100'-5" foot-high steel monopole containing four tiers of communication antennas is located at the rear of the lot. This is significant because the uses on the site will not change as a result of the proposed development. The site will continue function as both a commercial use and a public utility use if the development approvals are granted. At the base of the communications tower are associated radio equipment cabinets within a fenced compound. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding area is primarily developed with landscape nurseries, greenhouses, vineyards, and other agricultural uses. There is a paucity of residential development to the south. Abutting the subject property to the west is the Town of Southold Solid Waste Management District. The Town of Southold maintains a transfer station to accept household and commercial garbage and recyclables, along with a yard waste compost facility that accepts leaves and brush for disposal. They are located adjacent to the old Town Landfill, which is now capped and closed. Immediately north of the site is North Road Commons, a neighborhood-type shopping center located at the intersection of Middle Road and North Road. Other than the existing monopole on the subject property, there are no other structures of sufficient height in the immediate area on which to mount antennas. The area is dominated by one and two-story buildings and farm fields. Project Description The applicant proposes to install a metroPCS telecommunications facility consisting of a 8.5 foot-high monopole extension with six antennas attached at the top. Four appurtenant radio equipment cabinets are proposed to be located on a new 13' x 16' concrete slab within a proposed 18' x 20' fenced-enclosed equipment compound. The proposed compound will be annexed to the existing compound at the site. There is no additional building area proposed in connection with this project. Site disturbance will be minimal. A total of eighteen arborvitae trees, ten feet in height, are proposed to be planted outside of the fenced compound. One GPS antenna is to be located on the proposed cable bridge. Cellular Architecture The geographic area in which the provider is licensed to operate is subdivided into small regions or "cells." These areas may be different in size and architecture, depending upon variables such as terrain and morphology classification. Each cell has a "nucleus" composed of a base transmitting station (BTS). The BTS is comprised of the hardware needed to support communication between the mobiles and the Public Telephone Switched Network (PTSN). PCS and cellular systems use a grid-type architecture that provides coverage using Iow power radio transmitters mounted on existing structures where available, or newly constructed communication structures. By constructing sufficient and strategically placed transmitters or base stations, PCS and cellular operators provide continuous and "seamless" coverage wherever the end user might be. Because users often pass through several cells 2 as they travel through an area, the system automatically hands-off the call from one base station to the next. The facility will provide service to area residents, businesses, and the traveling public. Zoning The subject property is situated entirely within the LI "Light Industrial" zone. Wireless Communications facilities are regulated under §280-67 through §280-76.5 of the zoning ordinance (herein referred to as the Wireless Ordinance). This proposal represents a second pdority location as set forth in §280-70D(1)(b). The applicant seeks site plan approval. To the extent that there are any deviations from the wireless ordinance, the Planning Board has taken the position that it has the authority to waive these items. The application advances the goals of the wireless ordinance in the following manner: §280-70D(1): Applicants for wireless communications facilities shall locate, site and erect said wireless facilities in accordance with the following priorities: (a) "On an existing antenna support structure or other structures on Town-owned properties, including the right of way; (b) On existing antenna support structure or other structures on other property in the Town...." §280-72A(5): Wireless communications facilities shall be designed to provide for co-location by multiple providers or designed so that they can be retrofitted to accommodate multiple providers, wherever possible. §280-67: It is the express purpose of the article to minimize the visual and environmental impacts of wireless communications facilities while protecting the health safety and welfare of Southold's citizens and allowing wireless service providers to meet their technological and service objectives. Positive Aspects In our advanced technological society there is a manifest need for improved wireless telecommunications. Wireless telecommunications now plays a vital role in preserving the safety of all citizens. As of December 2010 there are 302.9 million wireless subscriber connections in the United States? The number of wireless only households is 26.6%.2 Each day in the U.S. over 296,000 calls are made from wireless phones to 9- 1-1 and other emergency numbers.3 Wireless phones are routinely used to report traffic accidents, drunk driving incidents and suspected crime activity to the proper authorities. The success of emergency relief and recovery efforts relies on the ability of workers to communicate effectively, efficiently and securely. Wireless technology is uniquely suited to these applications because (1) disasters typically do not affect wireless communication links; and, (2) the rapid deployment of a communications system for mobile field workers is more productive with a wireless system. The users of this system include insurance companies; emergency relief workers; federal, state and local disaster agencies; emergency medical personnel; and other suppliers of necessary services. The federal government's policy regarding the importance of enhanced wireless 9-1-1 service is expressed in Title 47, USCA {}615 which states: "The Federal Communications Commission shall encourage and support efforts by States to deploy comprehensive end-to-end emergency communications infrastructure and programs, based on coordinated statewide plans, including seamless, ubiquitous, reliable telecommunications networks and enhanced wireless 9-I-1 service. In encouraging and supporting that deployment, the Commission shall consult and cooperate with State and local officials responsible for emergency services and public safety, the telecommunications industry ..., the motor vehicle manufacturing industry, emergency medical service providers and emergency dispatch providers, transportation officials, special 9-t-1 districts, public safety, tire service and law enforcement officials, consumer groups, and hospital emergency and trauma care personnel." In addition to public safety services, a variety of other services available to the consumer advance the public good. These services include classroom networking, intelligent ] www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/AID/10323 ~ www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfrodAID/10323 3 www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/AlD/10323 4 transportation systems (ITS), inventory management, electronic newspapers and other programs which transmit voice and data transmissions more efficiently and securely. The FCC mandates that wireless communication services shall be available to all the people of the United States at a reasonable charge, for the purposes of the national defense and promoting safety of life and property. The proposed base station facility located in the Town of Southold is necessary to construct and complete the FCC- licensed network. Potential Visual Impact The proposal does not change the number or locations of towers in Southold. Residents are passers-by are already acclimated to the presence of a tall structure in the area. The additional 8.5 foot extension will not change their perception of the site. The proposed increase in height is a superior planning alternative to the construction of a new tower in this community. Nationwide, co-location is favored in virtually all zoning ordinances, including the ordinances of the Town of Southold. There is no visual impact associated with the equipment area. The proposed landscaping wiJl completely obscure the visibility of the equipment from surrounding areas. Computer photo-simulations of the proposed facility have been prepared by EBI Consulting and are part of this application. The document is entitled "Visual Analysis prepared for metroPCS, Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility, NY7314, County Road 48, Rev 3, provided by EBI Consulting, dated May 4, 2010 and revised August 4, 2011." The report depicts both pre-development and post- development conditions at six locations surrounding the site. David Karlebach, PP, PC has reviewed these photo-simulations and finds them to be accurate and correct. The photo-simulations represent a slight increase in the height of the monopole, the visibility of which is not harmful to the neighborhood. Conclusion The site is developed with an existing communications tower which is specifically designed to accommodate telecommunication antennas and equipment. This precludes the need to erect a new freestanding structure that would potentially have a far greater community impact, The location of the use on a previously developed site eliminates normal planning concerns with respect to access, drainage, and the availability of utilities. The spatial requirements are minimal; the proposed equipment area measures only 13 feet x 16 feet. There is no need for tree removal or site grading operations. The proposed monopole extension will have minimal effect on the surrounding area. If there is any visual impact associated with this site, it lies solely with the existing structure. The small increase in the height of the pole does not alter the visual quality of the site. The proposed facility will not have a significant impact on the environment or the community, and will not affect the quality of life of Southold residents in a negative way. The local reviewing agencies in Southold have determined that this site is particularly suited for this use when approving prior applications to install telecommunication antennas and equipment. It is prudent to conclude that a slight enhancement of the facility would yield the same findings. EBI Consulting Visual Analysis Prepared For: metroPGS. Unlimit Yourself~ PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY NY7314 COUNTY ROAD 48 REV 3 Provided By: EBI Consulting May 4, 2010 Revised: August 4, 201 I EBI C 0 N S U L T I N G PN: 61093853 Site Number: NY7314 Site Name: County Road 48 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Prepared For: Metro PCS Provided By: EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 ph. 781.273.2500 fax 781.273.3311 mEBI CONSULTING www.ebiconsulting.com 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: (781) 273.2500 Fax: (781) 273.3311 Letter of Methodology August I 0, 201 I 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Site Name: NY7314 The following is a description of the methodology used by EBI Consulting in preparing the visual analysis study of the proposed MetroPCS installation for the site located at 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY ("Property"). The proposed facility ("Facility") consists of small panel antennas mounted to a 8'-6" pole extension on an existing 100' monopole ("Existing Tower") at the Property and also related equipment on the ground. Both the antennas and equipment will be painted to match the existing monopole so as to not have any adverse visual impact to the area. A site visit was made on April 2% 2010 and photographs were taken from various locations around the Facility using an Olympus E-500 digital camera. The actual weather condition was clear, sunny and within reasonable visibility to perform the analysis. Using the technical and mechanical specification documents we built and arranged the Facility using 3D software called 3D Studio Max. 3D Studio Max allows us to add a daylight system that calculates what direction the sun will point according to what time of day, the date, and from the location the photographs were taken. The next step involved loading the map and the photographs taken at the site into 3D Studio Max and positioning virtual cameras in the software, based on the locations the photos were taken from. These cameras represent the photographer who took the photographs and it takes into consideration the average height at which the camera would have been held by an average five to six foot person. These cameras are placed at the exact locations on the map; therefore it automatically calculates the exact distance and perspective of the Facility. This generated simulated 3D views of the photographer's viewpoint plus the addition of the 3D model of the proposed Facility. Once these simulated viewpoints were created in 3D Studio Max, realistic lighting, shadows, and materials were rendered upon the proposed Facility and the result is multiple images that depict the proposed Facility on the photograph. The new images created by 3D Studio Max are imported into software called Photoshop and each view is labeled accordingly based upon the information provided by the field technician. The final product results in high quality existing and proposed images that accurately depict the addition of the proposed Facility. Kindly note that photo simulations are intended to represent modifications relative to a person observing the aesthetics of the proposed Facility. Therefore, they are inherently approximate in nature and should not be used as an exact, scaled, engineering drawing. Sincerely, John Menezes EBI Consulting Office: 781-425-5108 FAX: 781-425-5163 Mobile: 781-572-5173 jmenezes(~,ebiconsulting.com www.ebiconsultine.com VISIBILITY MAP Legend -k Project Site Photo Location Points Photo location Map 0 400 800 ft 1200 1600 2000 METRO PCS/NY7314 - COUNTY ROAD 48 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 mEBI VtEW1 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CORNER OF CR48 & DEPOT LN. VIEW PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CORNER OFCR48 & DEPOT LN, ViEW 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING EAST FROM DEPOT LN. ViEW 2 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING EAST FROM DEPOT LN. VIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROMCR48 VIEW PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM CR 48 VIEW 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM COX LN, VIEW 4 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM COX LN. VIEW 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CHURCH LN. VIEW 5 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CHURCH ViEW 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS I LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CORNER OF COXLN~& MATTHEW'S LN. ViEW 6 PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS I LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CORNER OF COX LN. & MATTHEW'S LN. Date: April 29, 20'11 Cheryl Schultz Crown Castle USA Inc. 3530 Toringdon Way; Suite 300 Charlotte, NC 28277 (704) 405-6632 Subject: Carrier Designation: Crown Castle Designation: Structural Analysis Report Metro PCS Co-Locate Carrier Site Number: Carrier Site Name: Crown Castle BU Number: Crown Castle Site Name: Crown Castle JDE Job Number: GPD GROUP GPD Group 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 Akron, OH 44311 (330) 572-2137 jcheronis(~,qpdgroup.com NY 7314 NY 7314 806579 NY Cu~hogue 958280 149440 Engineering Firm Designation: GPD Associates Project Number: 2O11178.90 Site Data: 21855 Country Rd., Cutchogue, NY '11935, Suffolk County Latitude 41 ° 1'46.57", Longitude -72° 29' 50.29" 100 Foot - Monopole Tower wi 8.5' Extension Dear Ms. Cheryl Schultz, GPD Group is pleased to submit this "Structural Analysis Report" to determine the structural integrity of the above mentioned tower. This analysis has been performed in accordance with the Crown Castle Structural 'Statement of Work' and the terms of Crown Castle Purchase Order Number 413832, in accordance with application 116487, revision 4. The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the tower stress level. Based on our analysis we have determined the tower stress level for the structure and foundation, under the following load case, to be: LC1: Structure w/Existing + Reserved + Proposed Note: See Table I and Table II for the proposed and existing/reserved loading, respectively. Sufficient Capacity The analysis has been performed in accordance with the TIA-222-G standard and all local code requirements based upon a wind speed of 120 mph 3-second gust. We at GPD Group appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and Crown Castle USA Inc. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please give us a call. Resu~;ffully sabra--ed by: David a. Granger, PE~'~.,,,,/~'~\ New York ~: 0~87-1 -- 520 South Main Street. Suite 2531 . Akron, Ohio 44311 . 330-572-2100. Fax 330-572-2101 . www.GPDGroup.con~ Glaus Pyle Schomer Burns and DeHaven, Inc Akron. Cleveland. Columbus. Marion. Youngstown. Indianapolis. Atlanta. Seattle. Phoenix Crown Castle USA, Inc. 100 Ft Monopole w/ 8.5' Extension Tower Structural Analysis Project Number 2011178.90, Application 116487, Revision 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) INTRODUCTION 2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information Table 3 - Design Antenna and Cable Information 3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 4 - Documents Provided 3.1 ) Analysis Method 3.2) Assumptions 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 5 - Section Capacity (Summary) Table 6 - Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity - LC1 4.1) Recommendations 5) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES 6) APPENDIX A RISATower Output 7) APPENDIX B Base Level Drawing 8) APPENDIX C Additional Calculations April 29, 2011 CCI BU No 806579 Page 2 R~SATower Report - version 5.4.2.0 April 29, CCI BU No 806579 Page 3 Crown Castle USA, Inc. 100 Ft Monopole w/ 8.5' Extension Tower Structural Analysis Project Number 2011178.90, Application 116487, Revision 4 1) INTRODUCTION The existing monopole has 12 sides and is evenly tapered from 36" (fiat-flat) at the base to 14.5" (fiat-flat) at the top. It has three major sections, connected with slip joints. The tower is painted white and has no tower lighting. The tower was originally designed by EEl in August of 1991 for a wind speed of 80 mph per EIA-222-D. Modifications designed by PJF (Job #: 41704-152, dated 11/30/05) have been installed and were considered in the analysis. They consisted of installing modification plates to the pole shaft and adding anchor rods to the base plate. Modifications designed by GPD (Project #: 2010111.14 Rev. C, dated 8/18/10) have also been installed and were considered in this analysis. They consist of installing modification channels to the pole shaft, removing existing fiat plate reinforcement on the pole, installing additional anchor rods to the base plate, and installing a concrete collar to the tower base foundation. The proposed 12' tower extension called out in these drawings was not installed was therefore not considered. The modifications designed by GPD (Project #: 2011111.18, dated 3/30/11) which consist of adding an 8.5' extension to the top of the tower were considered in this analysis. 2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA The rigorous structural analysis was performed for this tower in accordance with the requirements of TIA-222*G Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures using a 3-second gust wind speed of 120 mph with no ice, 50 mph with 0.75 inch ice thickness and 60 mph under service loads. Table I - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information ~1ounting Number Feed Center Line Number of Manufacturer Antenna Antenna Model of Feed Line Note Level (ft) Elevation Antennas Lines Size (in) (ft) 110 6 Kathrein ~ 800 10504 12 1-5/8 108 I 1 1 i T:~ M°~i~~ 70~:~] 1 3/8 1 1 Maxrad GPS-TMG-26NMS 30 30 1 , Pipe Mount [PM 601-1] I 1/2 1 1 ) See Appendix B for the proposed coax layout. RISATower Report - version 5.4.2.0 Crown Castle USA, Inc. 100 Ft Monopele w/ 8.5' Extension Tower Structural Analysis Project Number 2011178.90, Application 116487, Revision 4 April 29, 2011 CCI BU No 806579 Page 4 Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information center I Number MoUnting Line I of Antenna! Antenna M°del Level (ft) Elevat on I.. ManufactUrer (ft) I''''ri'annas I 6 Antel ) ADA-85408580CF :NUmbar of Feed Lines Feed Line SiZe(in) 100 104 100 ) 3 I 1 [ 1 I 3 Antel I ADA-63406380CF Platform Mount [LP 602-1] Comsat RSI ! A-18A24N-U T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3' Andrew i E15S08P80 TMA 9 7/8 1 3/8 9O 90 I 6 Andrew T TMBXX-6516-R2M I 12 Scala T AP13-850/065D/DT6 24 7/8 7/8 1 7/8 2 7O 80 I 1 3 I 6 70 [ 3 I 3 I 3 12 ) Platform Mount [LP 305-1 12 Powerwave T LGP17205 TMA Powerwave I 1-rAW-0000112-001 TMA Kathrein I 800 10121 12 Powerwave I 7770.00 Powerwave I 7250.02 T T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3] 7/8 1) SLA loading. 2) Both lhe existing and SLA loadings were considered. The existing loading was found to control the analysis. Table 3 - Design Antenna and Cable Information Center Mounting Line ~ of ~ Antenna Level(fi) ElevatlonlAntennasl(fi) Manufacturer 100 100 80 Antenna Model ALP 9212 AMPS type platform DB560 Number I of FeedI Lines so 8'Standard Dishes Feed I Line Siza(i")I RlSATower Report - version &4.2.0 Crown Castle USA, Inc. 100 Ft Monopole w/ 8.5' Extension Tower Structural Analysis Project Number 2011178. 90, Application 116487, Re vision 4 3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 4 - Documents Provided Apd129,2011 CCIBUNo 806579 Page 5 Document; Original Tower Drawings Foundation Drawings Geotechnical Report Remarks Reference EEl Job #: CSONY257, dated 8/21/91 DOC ID # 642734 Edwards & Kelcey, Inc. Dwg #: 92-8012, dated 7/31/91 DOC ID # 260900 FDH project #: 04-1016E, dated 10/12J04 DOC ID # 949960 Source Crown DMZ Crown DMZ Crown DMZ DOC ID # 2412725 GPD Project #: 2010111.14 Rev. C, DOC ID #2619474 Crown DMZ Modification Drawings dated 8/18/10 Post Modification Inspection Report GPD Project #: 2010111.68, dated 8/26/10 DOC ID # 2710931 Crown DMZ Previous Analysis GPD Project #: 2010111.18, dated 3/30/11 DOC ID # 2861709 Crown DMZ Modification Drawings GPD Project#: 2011111.18, dated 3/30/11 DOC ID # 2861710 Crown DMZ 3.1) Analysis Method RISATower (vemion 5.4.2.0), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for vadous loading cases. Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A. 3.2) Assumptions 1) Tower and structures were built in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 2) The tower and structures have been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specification. 3) The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as specified in Tables 1 and 2 and the referenced drawings. 4) When applicable, transmission cables are considered as structural components for calculating wind loads as allowed by TIA-222-G. 5) Mount sizes, weights, and manufacturers are best estimates based on site photos provided and were determined without the benefit of a site visit by GPD. 6) The existing splice plates and end connections for the bent plate pole reinforcement were considered adequate and were not analyzed due to lack of information. Additionally the intermediate bolt connection spacings were assumed due to lack of information. 7) Transition stiffeners at the base of the tower were not considered in this analysis. However, the tower base section was found to be adequate based on the modified reactions due to the installed anchor rod modifications. 8) Additional moment due to tower eccentricity on the modified pad foundation was considered in this analysis. 9) All member connections and foundation steel reinforcing are assumed designed to meet or exceed the load carrying capacity of the connected member and surrounding soils respectively unless otherwise specified in this report. 10) The modification drawings designed by GPD (Project #: 2011111.18, dated 3/30/11) were considered in this analysis and shall be instalred prior to the proposed loading. This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. GPD Associates should be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the tower. RISATower Report - version 5.4.2.0 Crown Castle USA, Inc. Apl# 29, 2011 100 Ft Monopole w/ 8.5' Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2011178. 90, Application 116487, Revision 4 Page 6 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 5 - Section Capacity (Summary) Sect on I£I ...I Component L1 J 108.5 - 100.5 ! PoleI TP12x12x0.375 .., IsF*. a.owl I (-. i ICa.a , l '"'"" -0.91 I 431.40 / 17.6 / Pass L3 r100-82.08~'1 Pole '-[ TP18.5521x14.5xO.1875 ~---~ ~."-~[ 785.50 '~87.6~ Pass ' I ~05 1POle.Rein,' ~TP29.0291~5.4763'.9198 7 ~-25.30 F5679.45 F;2.6 ~ Pass See Appendix C for Mod fled Monopole Capacities Table 6':':r0wer C0mP'°n'entStressesl Vs. ~apa~!tY ' LC! · ........... Notse I Component Elevation (fi) % Capaci~ Pass I Fail 1 ~ Anchor Rods ~ 6~3% 1 Base Plate [ 76,2% ........... ~- ......... ['- ~ ~0-~ ~-~' -T .................... 69.8% I --i Flange Bolts--f 100' 8.2% 1 I Flange Plate 100' ~ 12.7% T Pass Structure Rating (max from all components) = I 96.4% Notes: 1) See additional documentation in "Appendix C - Additional Calculations' for calculations supporting the % capacity consumed. 4.1) Recommendations The designs of the modified tower and its modified foundation are sufficient for the proposed loading and do not require further modification. RISATower Report - version 5.4.2.0 Crown Castle USA, Inc. April 29, 2011 100 Ft Monopole w/ 8.5' Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2011178.90, Application 116487, Revision 4 Page 7 5) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES GPD GROUP has not performed a site visit to the tower to verify the member sizes or antenna/coax loading. If the existing conditions are not as represented on the tower elevation contained in this report, we should be contacted immediately to evaluate the significance of the discrepancy. This is not a condition assessment of the tower or foundation. This report does not replace a full tower inspection. The tower and foundations are assumed to have been propedy fabricated, erected, maintained, in good condition, twist free, and plumb. The engineering services rendered by GPD GROUP in connection with this Rigorous Structural Analysis are limited to a computer analysis of the tower structure and theoretical capacity of its main structural members. All tower components have been assumed to only resist dead loads when no other loads are applied. No allowance was made for any damaged, bent, missing, loose, or rusted members (above and below ground). No allowance was made for loose bolts or cracked welds. GPD GROUP does not analyze the fabrication of the structure (including welding). It is not possibte to have all the very detailed information needed to perform a thorough analysis of every structural sub-component and connection of an existing tower. GPD GROUP provides a limited scope of service in that we cannot verify the adequacy of every weld, plate connection detail, etc. The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility of adding appurtenances usually accompanied by transmission lines to the structure. It is the owner's responsibility to determine the amount of ice accumulation, if any, that should be considered in the structural analysis. The attached sketches are a schematic representation of the analyzed tower. If any material is fabricated from these sketches, the contractor shall be responsible for field verifying the existing conditions, proper fit, and clearance in the field. Any mentions of structural modifications are reasonable estimates and should not be used as a precise construction document. Precise modification drawings are obtainable from GPD GROUP, but are beyond the scope of this report. Miscellaneous items such as antenna mounts etc., have not been designed or detailed as a part of our work. We recommend that material of adequate size and strength be purchased from a reputable tower manufacturer. GPD GROUP makes no warranties, expressed and/or implied, in connection with this report and disclaims any liability arising from material, fabrication, and erection of this tower. GPD GROUP will not be responsible whatsoever for, or on account of, consequential or incidental damages sustained by any person, firm, or organization as a result of any data or conclusions contained in this report. The maximum liability of GPD GROUP pursuant to this report will be limited to the total fee received for preparation of this report. RISATower Repor~ - version 5.4.2.0 Crown Castle USA, Inc. April 29, 2011 100 Ft Monopole w/ 8,5' Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2011178.90, Application 116487, Revision 4 Page 8 APPENDIX A RISA TOWER OUTPUT RISATower Report - version 5.4.2.0 ALL REACTIONS ARE FACTORED AXIAL SHEAR MOMENT 40K 41 K 3028 kip-ft DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING TYPE ELEVATION TYPE I ELEVATION MATERIAL STRENGTH I GRADE Fy[l~3k~ Fu GRADE I FyII~°~ Fu TOWER DESIGN NOTES 1. Tower is located in Suffolk County, New York. 2. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard. 3. Tower designed for a 120 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard. 4. T~,ver is also designed for a 50 mph basic wind with 0.75 in ice. Ice is considered to increase in thickness with height. 5. Deflections am based upon a 60 mph wind. 6. Tower Structure Class II. 7. Topographic Category 1 with Crest Height of 0.00 ft GPD Groul~ I :NY Cutcho~lue, BU#: 806579 520 S. Main St. Suite 2531 lP~.'~:zolll?a. 9o Akron OH 44311 ~c,~ Crown CastI~bY:cbuHo~~'~ Feedline Distribution Chart 0' - 108'6" Face A Face B Face C .~.~ GPD Group r°b: NY Cutchogue, BU~: 806579 J ,,11~.~ 520 S. Main St. Suite 2531 ~: 2o~I~7~.~ I [~ DrJ~L~L9 Akron, OH 44311 ~c,~ Crown Castl~'nbY:cbu~o~ApP~d: ~ Phone:(330) 572-2100 ~c : TIA-222-G ~ :~/29/11 ~ NT~ FAX. (330) 572-2101 F ............... ~ ........ I E-71 RIgA Tower Jo- ...o NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 1 of 9 GPD Group ProJe~ Da~ 520 & MaM St. Suite 2531 2011178.90 15:52:17 04/29/11 l~on, 0~443ll Client Design~ by Pho~: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle F~: (330) 572-2101 cbu~on Tower Input Data There is a pole section. This tower is designed using the TIA-222-G standard. The following design criteria apply: Tower is located in Suffolk County, New York. Basic wind speed of 120 mph. Structure Class II. Exposure Category C. Topographic Category 1. Crest Height 0.00 fl. Nominal ice thickness of 0.7500 in. Ice thickness is considered to increase with height. Ice density of 56 pcf. A wind speed of 50 mph is used in combination with ice. Temperature drop of 50 °F. Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph. A non-linear (P-delta) analysis was used. Pressures are calculated at each section. Stress ratio used in pole design is 1. Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feedline supports, and appurtenance mounts are not considered. Options Consider Moments - Legs Consider Moments - Horizontals Consider Moments - Diagonals Use Moment Magnification .4 Usc Code Stress Ratios x/ Use Code Safety Factors - Guys Escalate Icc Always Usc Max Kz Use Special Wind Profile Include Bolts In Member Capacity Leg Bolts Are At Top Of Section .4 Secondary Horizontal Braces Leg Use Diamond Inner Bracing (4 Sided) Add IBC .6D+W Combination Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform Assume Legs Pinned .4 Assume Rigid Index Plate .4 Use Clear Spans For Wind Area .4 Use Clear Spans For KL/r Retension Guys To Initial Tension .4 Bypass Mast Stability Checks x/ Use Azimuth Dish Coefficients .4 Project Wind Ama of Appurt. .4 Autocalc Torque Arm Areas SR Members Have Cut Ends Sort Capacity Reports By Component .4 Triangulate Diamond Inner Bracing Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder Use ASCE 10 X-Brace Ly Rules Calculate Redundant Bracing Forces Ignore Redundant Members in FEA SR Leg Bolts Resist Compression AIl Leg Panels Have Same Allowable Offset Girt At Foundation Consider Feedline Torque Include Angle Block Shear Check Polea Include Shear-Torsion Interaction Always Use Sub-Critical Flow Use Top Mounted Sockets Tapered Pole Section Geometry Section Elevation Section Length LI 108.50-100.50 8.00 L2 100.50-100.00 0.50 L3 100 00-82.08 IT92 Splice Number Top Bottom Wall fiend Pole Grade Length of Diameter Diameter Thic~ess Radius ft Sides in in in in 0.00 Round 12,0000 12.0000 0.3750 A53-B-35 (35 ksi) 0.00 Round 12.0000 14.5000 0.3750 A53-B-35 (35 ksi) 000 12 14.5000 18.5521 0.1875 0.7500 A572-65 RISA Tower Jcc .a o NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 2 of 9 Project Date GPD Groop 520 s. Main St. Suite 253l 2011178.90 15:52:17 04/29/11 S~ction L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 Lll Elevation Section Splice Number Top Bottom Wall Bend Pole Grade Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius ft /t [t Sides in in in in (65 ksi) 82,08-70.23 11.85 3.16 12 18.5521 20.5386 0.7269 2.9076 A572-65 (65 ksi) 70.23-60.17 13.22 0.00 12 18.5555 22.9987 0.7502 3.0008 A572-65 (65 ksi) 60.17-33.75 26.42 4.13 12 22.9987 28.0930 0.8909 3.5636 A572-65 (65 ksi) 33.75-30,50 7.38 0.00 12 25.5149 29,0291 0.9002 3.6008 3372-65 (65 kal) 30.50-16.21 14.29 0.00 12 29.0291 32.2955 0.8978 3.5912 A572-65 (65 ksi) 16.21-12.96 3.25 0.00 12 32.2955 33.0830 0.9036 3.6144 A572-65 (65 ksi) 12.96-9.00 3.96 0.00 12 33.0830 33,9430 0.9784 3.9136 A572-65 (65 ksi) 9,0041.00 9.00 12 33.9430 36.0000 0.7501 3,0004 A572-65 (65 ksi) Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Round Or Flat Description Sector Component Placement Type LDF7-50A 0-5/8 FOAM) C Surface Ar 108,00 - 8.00 1 (CaAa) LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) C Surface Ar 108.00 - 8.00 11 (CaAa) LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) C Surface Ar 108,00 - 8.00 1 (CaAa) LDF4-50A( 1/2") C Surface Ar 30.00 - 8,00 1 (CaAa) MP3~)8 Mod Channel (Rev G) B Surface Af 15.50 - 8.00 1 (Cana) MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev G) B Surface Af 30.50 - 15,50 1 (CaAa) MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev G) B Surface Af 66.25 - 30.50 1 (CaAa) MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev G) B Surface Af 75.50 - 72.25 I (CaAa) MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev G) B Surface Af 85,50 - 75.50 1 (CaAa) Bridge Stiffeners B Surface Af 72.25 - 66.25 1 (CaAa) Bridge Stiffener s B Surface Af 81.50 - 75.50 1 (Ca~a) Bridge Stiffeners C Surface Af 72.25 - 66.25 I (CaAa) Bridge Stiffeners C Surface Af 81,50 - 75.50 I Total Number Start/End Width or Perimeter Weight Number Per Row Position Diameter 0.000 1.9800 0.00 0.000 11 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0,000 7,9300 24.9100 0.00 0.000 0.000 7.9300 24.9100 0.00 0.000 0.000 6.8900 21.9900 0.00 jo~~' ~ Page RISA Tower NY Cutchogue, BUg: 806579 3 of 9 Project Date GPD Group 520 S. Main St. Suite 2531 201 1 178.90 15:52:17 04/29/1 1 Akron, 0H44311 Client Designed by Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle cburton FAX: (330) $72-2101 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area Description Face Allow Component Placement Total C~4A Weight or Shield Type Number Les ~ lee hr/ LDF5-50A (7/8 FOAM) A No Inside Pole 70.00 - 8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0,00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 1" Icc 0.00 0.00 LDF5-50A (7/8 FOAM) B No Inside Pole 100.00 - 8.00 9 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 1" Ice 0.00 0.00 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) B No Inside Pole 100.00 - 8.00 I No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2' Ice 0.00 0.00 1" Icc 0.00 0.00 LDFS-50A (7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 90.00 - 8.00 24 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2" Icc 0.00 0.00 1" Icc 0.00 0.00 LDFS-50A (7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 80.00 - 8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 1" Ice 0.00 0.00 Discrete Tower Loads ] Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CaA~ C~4A Weight or Type Horz Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Veri fi fi f~ ftz K /t T-Ann Mount [TA 702-3] C None 0.0000 108.00 No Ice 5.64 5.64 0.34 1/2" Ice 6.55 6.55 0.43 1" Ice 7.46 7.46 0.52 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 3.53 0.04 2.00 I/2" Ice 4.55 4.59 0,08 2.00 1" Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.46 40.0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 3.53 0.04 2.00 1/2" Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08 2.00 1" Ice 5.06 5.36 O. 12 (2) 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 3.94 10.00OO 108.00 No Ice 3.94 3.53 0,04 0,69 1/2" Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08 2.00 I" Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12 (2) 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 3.94 10.0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 3.53 0.04 0.69 1/2' Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08 2.00 l" Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12 Platform Mount [LP 602-1] C None 0.0000 100.00 No Ice 32.03 32.03 1.34 I/2" Icc 38.71 38.71 1.80 1" Ice 45.39 45.39 2.26 2" x 60" Mount Pipe A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 1.00 1.00 0.03 Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 1.39 1.39 0.04 g 0.00 1" Ice 1.70 1.70 0.05 2" x 60' Mount Pipe B From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 1.00 1.00 0.03 Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 1,39 1.39 0.04 g 0.00 1" Ice 1.70 1.70 0.05 2" x 60' Mount Pipe C From 3.80 -I 8.0000 100.00 No Ice 1.00 1.00 0.03 Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 1.39 1.39 0.04 g 0.00 1" Ice 1.70 1,70 0.05 (3) ADA-85408580CF w/ A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 Nolcc 5.41 3.44 0.03 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 I/2" Ice 5.86 4.04 0.07 g 4.00 1" Ice 6.32 4.66 0.12 RISA Tower GPD Group $20 s. Main St. Suite 2531 Akron, 0H44311 Phone: (330) 572-2100 F/X: (350) 572-2101 Description Face Offset Leg Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 4 of 9 Project Date 2011178.90 15:52:17 04/29/11 Client Designed by Crown Castle cburton Offsets: Azimuth Placement C~4~ C~AA Weight Ho~ Adjustment Front Side Lateral Vert fl f /t~ ft~ K (3) ADA-85408580CF w/ B From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 5.41 3.44 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -I.24 1/2" Ice 5.86 4.04 g 4.00 1" Ice 6.32 4.66 (3) ADA-63406380CF w/ C From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No [ce 8.62 4.07 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2" Ice 9.29 4.94 g 4.00 1" Ice 9.91 5.67 A-I 8A24N-U C From 4.00 0.0000 100.00 No Ica 6.57 0.54 Centroid-Fa 0.00 1/2" Icc 6.91 0.70 ca 0.00 1" Ica 7.25 0.86 T-Ann Mount [TA 602-3] C None 0.0000 90.00 No Ice 11.59 11.59 1/2" Ice 15.44 15.44 1" Ice 19.29 19.29 (2) TMBXX~516-R2M w/ A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5.72 Mount Pipe 2.00 I/2" Ice 8.34 6.92 0.00 I" Ice 9.07 7.97 (2) TMBX~-6516-R2M w/ B From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5.72 Motmt Pipe 2.00 1/2" Ice 8.34 6.92 0.00 1" Ice 9.07 7.97 (2) TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ C From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5.72 Mount Pipe 2.00 1/2" Ice 8.34 6.92 0.00 1" Ice 9.07 7.97 (2) RR65-19-02DP w/mount A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 NoIc¢ 5.87 4.17 pipe 2.00 1/2" Ice 6.32 5.16 0,00 1" Ica 6.79 5.96 (2) RR65-19~)2DP w/mount B From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 5.87 4.17 pipe 2.00 U2" Ice 6.32 5.16 0.00 1" Ice 6.79 5.96 (2) RR65-I 9-02DP w/mount C From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 5.87 4.17 pipe 2.00 1/2" lee 6.32 5.16 0.00 I" Ice 6.79 5,96 E15S08PS0 A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 Nolce 0.23 0,12 2.00 I/2" Ice 0.30 O. 17 0.00 1" Ica 0.38 0.24 EI5S08PS0 B From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.23 0.12 2.00 1/2" Ice 0.30 0.17 0.00 1" Ice 0.38 0.24 E15S08PS0 C From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.23 0.12 2.00 1/2" Ice 0.30 0.17 0.00 1" Ice 0.38 0.24 E 15509P94 A From I~g 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.66 0.37 2.00 1/2" Ica 0.78 0.46 0.00 1" Ica 0.90 0.56 EI5S09P94 I3 From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.66 0.37 2.00 1/2" Ice 0.78 0.46 0.00 1" Ice 0.90 0.56 E15509P94 C From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Icc 0.66 0.37 2.00 I/2" Ice 0.78 0.46 0.00 1" Ica 0.90 0.56 Platform Mount [LP 305-1] C None 0.0000 80.00 NoIce 18.01 18.01 1/2" Ice 23.33 23,33 1' Ice 28.65 28.65 (4) DB845N65ZAXT A From 3.46 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 6.63 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2" Ice 6.97 7.80 g 2.00 I" Ice 7.57 8.69 (4) DB845N65ZAXT B From 3.46 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 6.63 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 I/2" Ice 6.97 7.80 g 2.00 1" Ice 7.57 8.69 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.06 0.18 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.77 0.99 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.04 0.08 0.13 0.04 0.08 0,04 0.08 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03 1.35 1.58 0.04 0.10 0.17 0.04 0.17 i t RI$ I Tower Job P.go NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 5 of 9 GPD Gro~ Pmje~ Date Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle F~- 030) 572-2101 cbudon Descr~tion Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement C/da C~1~ or Type Horz Adjustment Front Side ~eg Lateral Vert ft ft ft~ ft~ K (4) DB845N65ZAXT C From 3.46 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 6.63 0.04 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2" Ice 6.97 7.80 0.10 g 2,00 1" Ice 7.57 8.69 0.17 T-Ann Mount [TA 602-3] C None 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 11.59 11.59 0.77 1/2" Ice 15.44 15.44 0.99 1" Ice 19.29 19.29 1.21 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20,0000 70.00 No Icc 5.69 4.60 0.07 1.37 I/2" Ice 6.18 5.34 0.Il 0.00 1" Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17 7770.00 w/Motmt Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 6.58 4.94 0.08 1.37 1/2" [ce 7.21 5.86 0.I 3 0.00 1" Ice 7.80 6.64 0.19 7250.02 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70,00 No Ice 4.24 3.32 0.04 1.37 I/2" Ice 4.71 4.30 0.07 0.00 1"1c¢ 5.17 5.05 0.11 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 NoIce 5.69 4.60 0.07 0,00 1/2" lc¢ 6.18 5.34 0.11 0.00 I" Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17 7770.00 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 6.58 4.94 0.08 0.00 1/2" Ice 7,21 5.86 0.13 0.00 1" Ice 7.80 6.64 0.19 7250.02 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Icc 4.24 3.32 0.04 0.00 1/2" Ice 4,71 4.30 0.07 0.00 1" Ice 5.17 5.05 0.11 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 Nolte 5.69 4.60 0.07 0.00 1/2" Ice 6.18 5.34 0,11 0.00 1" Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17 7770.00 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 6.58 4.94 0.08 0.00 1/2" Ice 7.21 5.86 0.13 0,00 1" Ice 7.80 6.64 0.19 7250.02 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 4.24 3.32 0,04 0.00 1/2" Ice 4.71 4.30 0.07 0.00 I" lee 5.17 5.05 0.11 LGP17205 A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Icc 1.95 0.50 0.03 1.37 1/2" Ice 2.13 0.62 0,04 0.00 1" lc¢ 2.33 0.75 0.06 (2) TFAW-0000112-001 A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 Nolte 0.44 0.15 0.01 1.37 1/2" Ice 0.53 0,21 0.01 0.00 1" Ice 0,63 0.29 0.01 LGP17205 B From Leg 4.00 0,0000 70.00 No Ice 1,95 0.50 0.03 0.00 1/2" Ice 2.13 0.62 0.04 0.00 1" Ice 2.33 0.75 0.06 (2) TTAW-0000112-001 B From Leg 4,00 0.0000 70,00 No Ice 0,44 0.15 0.01 0.00 I/2" Ice 0.53 0,21 0.01 0.00 I" Ice 0,63 0.29 0.01 LGP 17205 C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 1.95 0.50 0,03 0.00 1/2" lee 2.13 0.62 0.04 0.00 I" Ice 2.33 0.75 0,06 (2) TFAW-0000112-001 C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 Nolc¢ 0.44 0.15 0.01 0.00 1/2" Ic¢ 0.53 0.21 0.01 0.00 1" Ice 0.63 0.29 0.01 Pipe Mount [PM 601-1] A From Leg 0,50 0,0000 30.00 No Ice 3.00 0.90 0.07 0.00 1/2" Ice 3,74 1.12 0.08 0.00 1" Ice 4.48 1.34 0.09 GPS-TMG-26NMS A From Leg 1.00 0.0000 30.00 Nolce 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.21 0.21 0.00 000 I" Ice 0,28 0.28 0.01 ~Yeight I I j~ ~ Page RISA Tower NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 6 of 9 GPD Group Project Date 5 2o s. Main st. suit~ 253/ 2011178.90 15:52:17 04/29/11 ~kron, 0H44~11 Client ~slgned by Pho~: (~0) ~72-2100 Crown Castle cbudon F~' (~0) 572-2101 Maximum Tower Deflections - Service Wind Section Elevation Horz. Gov. Tilt Twist No. Deflection Load fl in Comb. LI 108.5 - 100.5 10.882 44 0.9640 0.0044 L2 100.5 - 100 9.284 44 0.9471 0.0034 L3 100 - 82.083 9.185 44 0.9460 0.0034 [4 82.083 - 70.2338 6.041 44 0.6923 0.0012 L5 73.3913 - 60.1667 4.834 44 0.6307 0.0010 L6 60.1667 - 33.7477 3,230 44 0.5146 0.0007 L7 37.8773 - 30.5 1.291 44 0.3130 0.0003 L8 30,5 - 16.2083 0.840 44 0.2620 0,0002 L9 16.2083 - 12.9583 0.243 44 0,1386 0,0001 LI0 12.9583 - 9 0.158 44 0.I 120 0.0001 LI 1 9 - 0 0.077 44 0,0826 0.0001 [ Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Service Wind I Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature fl Comb. in ft 108.00 44 10.782 0.9629 0,0043 20746 100.00 44 9,185 0.9460 0.0034 7998 90.00 44 7.326 0.8183 0.0021 4232 80.00 44 5.735 0,6720 0.0011 4268 70.00 44 4.396 0.6066 0.0009 8542 30.00 44 0,813 0.2582 0.0002 6721 T-Arm Mount [TA 702-3] Platform Mount [LP 602-1 ] T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3] Platform Mount [LP 305-1] T-Ann Mount [TA 602-3] Pil~ Mom [~'M 6m-q I Maximum Tower Deflections - Design Wind I No. Deflection Load fi in Comb, L2 100.5 - 100 66.003 12 6.7114 0.0263 L3 100 - 82.083 65.306 12 6.7035 0.0261 [5 73.3913 - 60.1667 34.449 12 4.4910 0.0103 L6 60.1667 - 33.7477 23.042 12 3.6691 0.0070 L7 37.8773 - 30.5 9.215 12 2,2345 0.0032 L8 30.5- 16.2083 6,001 12 1.8708 0.0025 L9 16.2083- 12.9583 1.736 12 0.9898 0.0012 LIO 12.9583 - 9 1.127 12 0.8002 0.0009 LI 1 9 - 0 0.551 12 0.5898 0.0007 Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Desi[In Wind ~' Page RISA Tower NY Cutchogue, BUg: 806579 7 of 9 GPD Gronp Project Date $20 $, Main St. Suite 2531 2011 178.90 15:52:17 04/29/11 ,~l;ron, 0tt44511 Client Designed by Phone; (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle F~.X: (330) 572-210/ cburton Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature I08.00 T-Arm Mount [TA 702-3] 12 76.582 6.8213 0.0322 3074 100.00 Platform Mount [LP 602-1] 12 65.306 6.7035 0.0261 1192 90.00 T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3] 12 52.145 5.8142 0.0167 620 80.00 Platform Mount [LP 305-1] 12 40.858 4.7842 0.01 I0 613 70.00 T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3] 12 31.340 4.3201 0.0097 1216 30.00 Pi~ Mount [PM 601 - 1 ] 12 5.807 1.8440 0.0025 944 Compression Checks Pole Design Data Section Elevation Size L L. Kl/r A P. ~P, Ratio No. P, ft ft ft in~ K K ~. LI 108.5 - 100.5 8.00 0.00 0.0 13.6954 -0.91 (1) L2 100.5 - 100 (2) 0.50 0.00 0.0 13.6954 -0.91 [3 100 - 82.083 17.92 0.00 0.0 11.0876 -4.85 (3) IA 82.083 - 11.85 0.00 0.0 45.1326 -8.85 70.2338 (4) L5 70.2338 - 13.22 0.00 0.0 53.7445 -14.77 60.1667 (5) L6 60.1667 - 26.42 0.00 0.0 75.7503 -22.50 33,7477 (6) L7 33.7477 - 30.5 1P29.0291 x25.5149x0.9002 7.38 0.00 0.0 77.0513 -25.30 (7) L8 30.5 - 16.2083 TP32.2955x29.0291xO.8978 14.29 0.00 0.0 90.7681 -32.65 (8) L9 16.2083 - TP33.083x32.2955x0.9036 3.25 0.00 0.0 93.6289 -34.11 12.9583 (9) LI0 12.9583-9 TP33.943 x33.083x0.9784 3.96 0.00 0.0 103.853 -36.04 (10) 0 Lll 9-0(11) TP36x33.943x0.7501 9.00 0.00 0.0 85.1399 -39.52 TP12x12x0.375 TP14.5x12x0.375 TP18.5521x14.5xO.1875 TP20.5386x18.5521x0.7269 TP22,9987x18.5555x0.7502 TP28.093x22.9987x0.8909 431.40 0.002 431.40 0.002 785.50 0.006 3326.73 0.003 3961.50 0.004 5583.55 0.004 5679.45 0.004 6690.52 0.005 6901.39 0.005 7655.02 0.005 6275.66 0.006 Pole Bendin[I Desitin Data Section Elevation Size M= ?~M,~ Ratio M.y q~M,~ Ratio No. M= Mw ft kip-fl kip-ft ~M~ kip-fl kip-fl ~M~ LI 108.5 - 100.5 TP12x12x0.375 23.08 133.07 0.173 0.00 133.07 0.000 (1) L2 100.5 - 100 (2) TP14.5x12x0.375 23.08 133.07 0.173 0.00 133.07 0.000 L3 100-82.083 TP18.5521 xl4.Sx0.1875 254.60 293.22 0.868 0.00 293.22 0.000 (3) IA 82.083 - TP20.5386xl 8.5521 x0.7269 451.38 1269.35 0.356 0.00 1269.35 0.000 70.2338 (4) L5 70.2338 - TP22.9987xlS.5555x0.7502 832.37 1750.78 0.475 0.00 1750.78 0.000 60.1667 (5) L6 60.1667 - TP28.093x22.9987x0.8909 1577.43 2928.69 0.539 0.00 2928.69 0.000 RISA Tower Job .age NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 8 of 9 GPD Group Project Date $20 S. MainSt. Suite 2531 2011178.90 15:52:17 04/29/11 Akron, 0H44311 Client Designed by Phone: (330) $72-2100 Crown Castle F/X: (330) 572-210I cbudon Section Elevation Size No. 33.7477(6) L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29.0291x25.5149x0.9002 1725.20 (7) L8 30.5-16.2083 TP32.2955x29.0291x0,8978 2382.57 (8) L9 16.2083- TP33.083x32.2955x0.9036 2509.39 12.9583 (9) LIO 12.9583 -9 TP33.943x33.083x0.9784 2665.81 (10) Lll 9-0 (11) TP36x33.943x0.7501 3028.49 ~M~ Ratio M~ ~M~y Ratio Mu M~ kip-ft ~M~, I~-fi kip-ft ~M~ 2998.49 0.575 0.00 2998.49 0.000 4193.62 0,568 0.00 4193.62 0.000 4435.70 0.566 0.00 4435.70 0.000 5032.30 0.530 0.00 5032.30 0.000 4447.82 0.681 0.00 4447,82 0.000 Pole Shear Design Data I Section 3Io. Elevation Size Actual K ~Vn Ratio Actual 41T, Ratio L1 108,5 - 100.5 2.82 215.70 0.013 0.24 202.31 0.001 0) L2 100,5 - 100 {2) 2.85 262.09 0.011 0,24 202.31 0.001 L3 100- 82.083 16.21 392.75 0.041 0.65 594.56 0.001 (3) IA 82,083 - 23.75 1663.36 0.014 0.65 2573.84 0.000 70.2338 (4) L5 70.2338 - 31,79 1980.75 0.016 0.54 3550.05 0.000 60.1667 (5) L6 60.1667 - 35.38 2791.78 0,013 2.32 5938.47 0.000 33.7477 (6) L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29,0291 x25.5149x0.9002 36,35 2894.82 0.013 2.32 6080.00 0.000 (7) L8 30.5- 16.2083 TP32.2955x29.0291x0.8978 38,81 3345.26 0,012 2.32 8503.33 0.000 (8) L9 16.2083 - TP33.083 x32.2955x0.9036 39.25 3450.69 0.0Il 2.31 8994.25 0.000 12.9583 (9) LI0 12,9583 -9 TP33,943 x33.083x0.9784 39.80 3827.51 0.010 2.31 10203,92 0.000 LII 9-0(11) TP36x33.943x0.7501 40.85 3137.83 0.013 2.31 9018.83 0.000 TP12x12x0.375 TP14.SxI2x0.375 TPlS.552Ix14.5x0.1875 TP20,5386xlS.5521x0.7269 TP22.9987xlS.5555x0.7502 TP28,093x22.9987x0.8909 Pole Interaction Design Data I Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria No. P, M= M~ Vu T. Stress Stress fl ~P. ~M~ {Mnv ~V. {Tn Ratio Ratio LI 108.5 - 100,5 0,002 0.173 0.000 0.013 0.001 0.176 1.000 4,8.2 ~ (]) I/ L2 100.5-100(2) 0.002 0.173 0.000 0.0]1 0.001 0.176 1.000 4.8.2 t~' L3 100-82.083 0.006 0.868 0.000 0.041 0.001 0.876 1.000 4.8.2 ~ (3) v' RISA Tower NY Cutchoguo, Bt.J#: 80657g GPD Group Proje~ Date 520 S. Main St. Suite 25~1 2011178.90 15:52:17 ~/29/11 F~' (330) 572-2101 cbudon Section Capacity Table Section Elevation Component Size Critical P eP~ % Poas No. fi Type Element K K Capacity Fail LI 108.5 - 100.5 Polc TP12x12x0.375 1 -0.91 431.40 17.6 Pass L2 I0~,5 - 100 Pole TP14.Sx12x0.375 2 -0.91 431.40 17,6 Pass L3 100- 82.083 Pole TPI 8.5521 x14.Sx0.1875 3 4,85 785.50 87.6 Pass L4 82.083 - 70.2338 Pole TP20.5386x 18.5521 x0.7269 4 -8,85 3326.73 * Pass L5 70.2338 - Pole TP22.9987xlS.5555xO.7502 5 -14.77 3961.50 * Pass 60.1667 L6 60,1667 - Pole TP28.093x22.9987x0.8909 6 -22.50 5583.55 * Pass 33.7477 L7 33.7477 - 30.5 Pole TP29.0291 x25.5149x0.9002 7 -25.30 5679.45 * Pasa L8 30.5 - 16.2083 Pole TP32.2955x29.0291 x0.8978 8 -32.65 6690.52 * Pass L9 16.2083- Pole TP33.083x32.2955x0.9036 9 -34.11 6901.39 * Pass 12.9583 L10 12.9583-9 Pole TP33.943x33.083x0.9784 10 -36.04 7655.02 * Pass LI 1 9 - 0 Pole TP36x33.943x0.7501 11 -39.52 6275.66 * Pass Summary Pole (L3) 87.6 Pass RATING = 87.6 Pass *See Appendix C for Modified Monopole Calculations. Program Version 5,4.2.0 - 6/17/2010 File:N:/2011/2011178/90/RISMS06579.efi Crown Castle USA, Inc. 100 Ft Monopole w/ 8.5' Exlension Tower Structural Analysis Project Number 2011178.90, Application 116487, Revision 4 April 29, 2011 CCI BU No 806579 Page 9 APPENDIX B BASE LEVEL DRAWING RISATower Report - version 5.4.2.0 / / / ) 0 1 2 3FT : SCALE LEGEND: FEEDLINES ~ASE LEVEL DRAW1NG I I Crown Castle USA,/nc. April 29, 2011 1 O0 Ft Monopole w/8.5' Extension Tower StructuralAnalysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2011178.90, Application 116487, Revision 4 Page 10 APPENDIX C ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS RISATower Repot[ - version 5.4.2.0 Reinforced Monopole Analysis NY Cutchogue BU: 806579 MP3(~-6 3 L7 30.5 29.0291 0;3125 65 0-6 16 1725.2 25.3 30.35 2.32 0.9~G2 52.7% 72.6% Pass Plate 9x0.75 3 LIO 9 0.3t25 2665;81 36~04 ~ 231 64.1% 65.5% Pass GPD GROUP AN(;:HQR R(~D TRANSFORMATION IRev, G} Moment 5om RISA (M) = Axial from RISA (A) = Existing Bolt Diameter Existing BOd Area (A~) = Number E)dsting Bolts (nE) 225 in. Distance from neutral axis (d) = 2~ in. [determined in CAD) 8 ~u ~ Modified Bolt (1) Dtsmeter Modified Bolt Area (Amod) = Number Modified Bolts (nM) 4 Fu { Modified Bolt (2) Diameter Modified Bott Area (A~o~) = Number Modified Bolts (nM) *Taken from DSI Spec Sheel 2.79 in.* 6,11 in? Distance from neutral axis (d) = 2~ in. (determined in CAD) (Combined MOl of existing and post installed rods determined in CAD, Existing & Modified (2) Anchor Rod Capacity Controlling) (Combined MOl of existing and post installed rods determined in CAD, Modified (1) Anchor Rod Capacity Controlling) (Mod 1 ) f~,~d = (Mod 2) f~od Ax.,= (Mod 1) (Mod 2) Total= 169.95 kips 164.28 kips 306.44 kips 2.31 kips 1.84 kips 3.54 kips 40.00 kips Maximum compressive force in existing rods Maximum compressive force in modiflcaUon (1) rods Maximum compressive force in modiflca+Jon (2) rods 172.26 kips (f,+Ax~) 166.12 kips (f~+Ax~) 309.98 kips (fr~d+Ax~o~) Ultimate Axial Strength: Existing Rods (ftc)= 260.00 kips Ultimate Axial Strength: Modification (t) Rods (f~,~)= 309.60 kips Ultimate Axial Strength: Modification (2) Rods (f~a)= 5~0 kips (based on pull test load of 502 kips relerenced in PM( by GPD dated 8/26/10) Modification Rod (1) Rating= 53.1% Modification Rod (2) Rating= 51.7% Square, Stiffened ! Unstiffened Base Plate, Any Rod Material - Rev. F/G AssumPtions: 1) Rod groups at comers. Total # rods divisible by 4. Maximum tota~ # of rods = 48 (12 per Comer). 2) Rod Spacing = Straight Center-to-Center distance between any (2) adjacent rods (same comer) 3) Clear space between bottom of levelin~l nut and top of concrete not exceedin~l {1)*/Rod Diameter) Sits Data Base Reactions I BU#: 806579 I TIA Revision: G I I SiteName: N¥Cutchogue ~ Factored Moment, Mu:I 1152 ~ft-kips ~ 116487 Rev 4 ~ Factored Axial, Pu:L_~.~. .~kips ~ I Factored Shear, Vu:I 41 /kips I *Reactions have been modified due to modifications ' ' Anchor Rod Data Eta Factor, q 0.5 TIA G (Fi~. 4-4) Qty: 8 Diam: 2.25 "n Rod Material: A615-J Yield, Fy: 75 ~(si Strength, Fu: 100 Bolt Circle: 44 ~n Anchor Rod Results Plate Data I W=Side:I 42 in Thick:I 2.25 in Grade:~_ 60 ~nSi Clip Distance:| 6 Stiffener Data IWeldin~l at both sides) Configuration: Unstiffened Weld Type: Fillet ** Groove Depth: 0.375 <- Disregard Groove Angle: 45 <- Disregard Fillet H. Weld: 0.3125 m Fillet V, Weld: 0,3125 m Width: 5 ~n Height: 24 n Thick: 0.75 n Notch: 0.5 ,n Grade: 50 ~(si Weld str.: 70 ~(si Clear Space between 6 ~n Stiffeners at B,C. Pole Data Diam: 36 tin Thick: 0.3125 in Grade: 65 ksi # of S des: 12 I"0" IF Round TIA G -> Max Rod (Cu+ Vu/rt): Axial Design Strength, (~*Fu*Anet: Anchor Rod Stress Ratio: 172.3 Kips 260.0 Kips 66.3% Pass Base Plate Results Flexural Check Base Plate Stress: 41.2 ksi PL Design Bending Strength, (~*Fy: 54.0 ksi Base Plate Stress Ratio: 76.2% Pass N/A - Unstiffened Stiffener Results Horizontal Weld: N/A Vertical Weld: N/A Plate Flex+Shear, fb/Fb+(fv/Fv}~2; N/A Plate Tension+Shear, ftJFt+(fv/Fv)^2: N/A Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): N/A Pole Results Pole Punchin~ Shear Check: N/A Mox PL Length ~eld Line THICKNESS PL Ref. Data Yield Line (in): 23.40 Max PL Length: 23.40 Note: for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.4 - Square Base F-G 1.1, Effective April 4, 2011 Analysis date: 4/29/2011 Anchor Rod Layout ;.7500 ,,,~2.79[- 26.3850 L5000 520 Sou~ Main Street. Suite 2531, Akron, Ohio 44311 ~GPD ASSOCIATES Engineers. Aichitects, Planners Phone 330-572-2100 Fax 330-572-2101 Calculated By: ~ Date: Checked a~. l~ ~ Date: Reinforced Monopole Analysis NY Cutchogue BU: 806579 AISF= Max Capacity= # of Sides = Pass Stiffened or Unstiffened, Exterior Flang~ Site Data BU#: 806579 Site Name: NY Cutchogue App#: 116487Rev4 Pole Manufacturer:I Other Bolt Data Qty: 12 Adi Diameter (in.): I Bolt Fu: 125 Bolt Material:' Other Bolt Fy: 105 Strength (Fu): 126 ~si Yield (Fy): 105 ~si Circle (in.l: 25.75 Plate Data Diam: 28.5 ~n Thick, t: 1.75 ;n Grade (Fy): 50 ksi Strength, Fu: 65 , ksi Sin~lle-Rod B-eft: 3.14 In Stiffener Data (Weldin~ at Both Sides) Conflg: 0 Weld Type: Fillet Groove Depth: 0.25 <- Disregard Groove Angle: 45 <- Disregard Fillet H. Weld: 0.3125 ~n Fillet V. Weld: 0.3125 ~n Width: 3, ~n Height: 18 ~n Thick: 0.75 m Notch: 0.5 ~n Grade: 36 ksi Weld str.: 70 ksi Pole Data Diam: 12 ~n Thick: 0.375 in Grade: 35 ksi # of Sides: 0 "o" IF Round Fu 60 ksi Reinf. Fillet Welc 0 "0" if None Plate - Any Bolt Material TIA Rev G Reactions Bolt Threads: MuI 30.6 Iff-kips X-Exclude~d Axial, Pu:l 0.91 Jkips ~Vn=~0(0.55*Ab*Fu) Shear, Vu: 2.85 ~kips ~0=0.75, q~*Vn (kips): Elevat on: 100 ~ feet 40.50 *Reaction have been modified Ill No suffeners, Criteria:I TIAG I<-Only Applcable to Unstiffened Cases Flange Bolt Results I Non-Ri~lid Bolt Tension Capacity, (p'Tn,B1: 56.81 kips (p°Tn sted (p'Tn (due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.81 k ps cpTn[(1-(Vu/q~Vn)^2]~o.5 Max Bolt directly applied Tu: 4.68 Kips Min. PL "tc" for B cae. wlo Pry: 2.806 in Min PL "tre~" for actual T wi Pry: 0.625 in Min PL "tl" for actual T w[o P~: 0.805 in T allowable with Prying: 29.98 kips 0~;o'~;1 case Prying Force, q: 0.00 kips Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 4.68 kips Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 8.2% Pass Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check I Non-Ri~lid Compression Side Plate Stress: 4.7 ksi t TIAG Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi ~ ~*F¥ Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 10.4% Pas~ Comp. Y.L Length: NO Prying J 22.78 Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)~2: 12.7% Pass n/._~a Stiffener Results Horizontal Weld: rea Vertical Weld: rea Plate Flex+Shear, fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)^2: rea Plate Tension+Shear, f~Ft+(fv/Fv)^2: rea Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): rea Pole Results Pole Punching Shear Check: rEa * 0 = none, I = every bolt, 2 = every 2 bolts. 3 = 2 per bolt ** Note: for complete joint penetration groove w~lds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CCIplate 1.4 - Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective April 4, 2011 Analysis Date: 4/29/2011 Stiffened or Unstiffened, Exterior Flang~ Site Data BU#: 806579 Site Name: NY Cutchogue app#: 116487Rev4 Pole Manufacturer: J Other J Plate - Any Bolt Materia Reactions Mu Axial, Pu: Shear, Vu: Elevation: *Reaction hay IIf No stiffeners, Cdteda: TIA G Flange Bolt Results Bolt Data oty: 12 Adj Diameter (in.): I Bolt Fu: 125 Bolt Material: , Other Bolt Fy: 105 Strength (Fu): 125 ksi Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Cimle (in.l: 25.75 30.6 fi-kips 0.92 kips 2.85 kips 100 feet been modified Bolt Tension Capacity, (p'Tn,BI: Min PL "treq" for actual T wi Pry: Min PL "tl" for actual T w/o Pry; T allowable with P~Jing: Prying Force, q: Plate Data Diam: 28.5 ~n Thick, t: 1.5 ,n Grade (Fy): 50 <si Strength, Fu: ,, 65 <si Single-Rod B-eft: 3.89 ~n Jsted (p'Tn (due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: Max Bolt directly applied Tu: Min. PL "tc" for B CaD. W/O Pry: Stiffener Data (Weldin~l at Both SidesI Config: 0 Weld Type: Fillet Groove Depth: 0.25 <- Disregard Groove Angle: 45 <- Disregard Fillet H. Weld: 0.3125 ~n FilletV. Weld: 0.3125 m Width: 3 ~n Height: 18 ~n Thick: 0.75 ~n Notch: 0.5 ~n Grade: 36 ksi Weld str.: 70 ksi Pole Data Diam: 14.5 ~n Thick: 0.1875 ~n Grade: 65 ksi # of Sides: 12 "0' IF Round Fu 80 ksi Reinf. Fillet Weld 0 "0' if None Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): TIA Rev G Bolt Threads: I X-Excluded I (pVn=(p(0'55*Ab*Ful I (p=0.75, (p*Vn Ikips/: I 40.50 J I<-Only Applcable to Unstiffened Cases I Non-Ri~lid 56.81 kips ~*Tn 56.81 kips ~Tn[(1-(Vu/eVn)^2]~0.5 4.68 Kips 2.289 in 0.501 in 0.657 in 33.08 kips 0<a'<l case 0.00 kips 4.68 kips 8.2% Pass Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check ! Non-Rigid Compression Side Plate Stress: 5.1 ksiI TIAG Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi ~'F¥ Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 11.4% Pas Comp. Y.L. Length: No Prying 21.28 Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)^2: 11.1% Pass n/._~a Stiffener Results Horizontal Weld: n/a Vertical Weld: n/a Plate Flex+Shear, ~/Fb+(fv/Fv)^2: n/a Plate Tension+Shear, ft/Ft+(fv/Fv)^2: n/a Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a Pole Results Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a · 0 = none, I = every bolt, 2 = every 2 bolts, 3 = 2 per bolt ** Note: for complete joint penetration groove w~lds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CCIplate 1.4 - Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective April 4, 2911 Analysis Date: 4/29/2011 I Reactions - 100' I Quantity of Bolts= 9 I Moment 23.08 k-ft Axial 0.91 k Flange at 100' - Bolt Forces Label Member Size D from Centroid (in) Quantity Lu (in) Area (in') P~* Tension (Kips) Compresion (Kips) P~ Bolt 1.00 12.88 :12'88 p~ Bolt 1.00 11.15 4~00 i.00 0;79 3863 404 4124 P3 Bolt 1.00 6.44 Zoo ~.OO P4 Bolt 1.00 0.00 2,00 1.OO: 0.79 O,OO-0.10 (Bearing and Stability Checks) Tool for TIA Rev F or G - Any application (MP, SST, GT) Site Data BU#: 806579 Site Name: NY Cutchogue 958280 App #: 116487 Rev 4 Loads Already Factored For P IDL) I 1,2 <--Disregard For P,V,(wL)and MI 1.35 <--Disregard Pad & Pier Data Base PL Dist. Above Pier; 3 ~n Pier Dist. Above Grade: 24 ~n Pad Bearing Depth, D: 10 Pad Thickness, T: 4 Pad Width=Length, L:, 20.5 ft Pier Cross Section Shape: Round <-Puli Down Enter Pier Diameter: 6 [t Concrete Density: 150.0 pcf Pier Cross Section Area: 28.27 ft^2 Pier Height: 8.00 fi Soil (above pad) Hei~lht: 6.00 ff Soil Parameters Effective Unit Weight, y: 113.3 pcf Ultimate Searing Capacity, qn: 10.00 ksf Strength Reduct. factor, ~: 0.75 Angle of Friction, e: 0.0 degrees Undrained Shear Strength, Cu: 2.50 ksf Allowable Bearing: 4)*qn: 7.50 ksf Passive Pres. Coeff., Kp 1.00 Forces/Moments due to Wind and Lateral Soil Factored Pad Passive Force: 484.3 kips Pad Force Location Above D: 1.97 fi ~(Passive Pressure Moment): 717.22 fi-kips Factored O.T. M(WL), "1.6W": 3601.0 fi-kips Factored OT (MW-Msoil), M1 2883.73 fi-kips Resistance due to Foundation Gravity Soil Wedge Projection grade, a: 0.00 fi Sum of Soil Wedges Wt: 0.00 kips Soil Wedges ecc, KI: 0.00 fi Ftg+Soil above Pad wt: 552.6 (ips Unfactored (Total ft~l-soilWt): 552.61 ~ips 1.2D. No SoilWed~les. 703.14 kips 0.9D. With Soil Wedgies 527.35 kips Resistance due to CohesionIVerticall 4)*(1/2*Cu)(TotalVert. Planes) 275.79 kips Cohesion Force Eccentr cty, K2 6.10 Monopole Base Reaction Forces TIA Revision: G <-Pull Down Factored DL Axial, PDu: 40 kips Factored WL Axial, PWu: 0 kips Factored WL Shear, Vu: 41 kips Factored WL Moment, Mu: 3098.7 It-kips Load Factor Shaft Factored Loads 1.00 1.2D+l.6W, Pu: 40 kips 0.90 0.9D+l.6W, Pu: 30 kips Vu: 41 kips 1.00 Mu: 3098.7 fi-kips *Moment increased to account for pier eccentricity 1.2D+1.6W Load Combination, Bearlno Results: I (No Soil Wedaes~ P1='1.2D+1.6W" rReaction+Conc+Soill 703.14 (Kips) Factored '1.6W' Overturning ft-k ps Moment (MW*Msoil), M1 2883.73 Orthoqonal Direction: eccl = M1/P1 = 4.10 ft Orthogonal qua 3.01 ksf qu/~*qn Ratio= 40.16% Pass Diaoonal Direction: ecc2 = (0.707M1)/P1 = 2.90 fi Diagonal qua 4.60 ksf qu/~p*qn Ratio= 61.35% Pass Run I <-- Press Upon Completing All Input Overtumin~ Stability Check 0.gD+I.6W Load Combination, Beerin9 Results: (wi Soil Wedoes) 527.35 P2="0.9D+l.6W" [Reaction+Conc+Soil] (Kips) Factored "1.6W" Overturning Moment (MW-Msoil) - 0.9(M of 1369.68 fi-kips Wedge + M of Cohesion), M2 Orthogonal ecc3 = M2/P2 = 2.60 fi Ortho Non Beadng Length,NBL= 15.31 ft Odhogonal qua 1.89 ksf Diagonal qua 2.63 ksf Max Reaction Moment (fi-kips) so that qu=(p*qn = 100% Capacity Rating Actual M: I 3098.70 M Orthoc,,Ional: 6076.11 51.00% I M Diagona: 5627.54 55.06%I "Baring/Stability Pier Square Pad" Tool, BSPSQP, Version 2.0 - Effective 05/03/2010 Analysis Date: 4/29/2011 GPD GROUP Monopole or Self Suppo~ Pad Foundation Reinforcing NY Cutchogue BU:806579 2011178.90 Pad Width : f: *Original foundation rebar only considered. I I°verallCaeacief 6"~' ~ I 520 Soutfl ,Main Street. Suite 2531. Akron, Ohio 44311 Phone 330-572.2100 Fax 330-572-2101 ~GPD ASSOCIATES Ensineers. ,~chitects. Planners lob .Pinnacle Telecom Group Professional and Technical Services Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report MetroPCS Site NY7314 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, NY June 30, 2Oll 14 Ridgedale Avenue. Suite 209 · Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927 · 973-451-1630 CONTENTS INTROducTION and SUMMARy ANTENNa and TRANSMISSION DaTA CoMpliaNCE Analysis CoMplIANCE CoNClUSiON C;ERTificaTION 3 5 7 12 13 Appendix A. Background on the FCC; MPE Umit AppEndix B. Summary of ExpErt Qualifications INTROdUCe'ioN ANd SUMMARy At the request of MetroPC$, Pinnacle Telecom Croup has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequenoy (RI=) levels and related FCC compliance for a proposed wireless base station antenna operation to be added to an existing monopole at 2'1855 County Road 48 in Cutcho§ue, NY. MetroPC$ refers to the site by the code "NY7514", and proposes panel antennas arranged for sectorized service covera0e using the 2'100 MHz frequency band. The FCC requires all wireless operators to perform an assessment of the RF fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the compliance assessment needs to incorporate the RF effects of existing wireless antenna operations by AT&T, Nextel, T-Mobile, and Verizon VV~raless. Note that FCC regulations require any future antenna collocator to specifically assess and assure continuing FCC compliance based on the overall RF effects of all proposed and then-existing antennas at the site, This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula - and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, though, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit, If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case calculated result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below-the-limit factor". The result of the FCC compliance assessment in this case is as follows: [] The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is 2.0055 percent of the FCC MPE limit - well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level is more than 49 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions Eom antennas. [3 The results of the calculations provide clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations will be in clear compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and assumptions we incorporated in the analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than these calculation results indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: [] relevant technical data on the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation at the site, as well as on the existing antenna operations; [] a description of the FCC model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and [] analysis of the results, and the compliance conclusion for the antenna site. In addition, two Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit along with a list of key FCC references on compliance. Appendix B provides a summary of the qualifications of the expert certifying FCC compliance for this site. ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below summarizes the relevant technical data for the proposed MetroP¢$ antenna operation. Technical Data - MetroPOS ~"~ ~'~' * ~'~;" *' ' ~ ~' ':: ~ :~ ~ ~a~ Frequency Band 2100 MHz Service Coverage Type Sectorized Antenna Model Kathrein 800-10504 Antenna Maximum Gain 17.8 dBi Antenna Centerline Height AGL 110 f. 3 in. RF Channels per Sector 3 (~ 24 watts and 1 (~ 60 watts Antenna Line Loss ! Conservatively ignored (assumed ~ dB) The antenna vertical-plane emission pattern is used in the calculations of RF levels at ground level around a site, as it is a key determinant of the relative amount of RF emissions in the "downward" direction. Figure I on the next page shows the vertical-plane emission pattern of the antenna model proposed here by MetroPCS. Note that in these types of antenna emission pattern diagrams, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. Note, too, that the use of a decibel scale to describe the relative pattern at different angles incidentally serves to significantly understate the actual focusing effects of the antenna. Where the antenna pattern reads 20 dB, for example, the relative RF energy emitted at the corresponding downward angle is 1/100t~ of the maximum that occurs in the main beam (at 0 degrees); at the 30 dB point, it is 1/1,000th of the maximum. Figure 1. Kathreln 800-10504-Vertical-plane Emission Pattern Odeg horizon 5 dB I division As noted at the outset, them am other antenna operations to include in the compliance assessment. Each involves the use of directional panel antennas arranged for sectodzed cellular coverage, and in the analysis for each of the carriers, we will conservatively assume maximum capacity (and thus maximum power) operation. AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. Nextel is licensed to operate in the 851 MHz frequency band. There is a maximum of 12 RF channels in each sector, and each channel is set for maximum of 100 wafts of effective radiated power (for which the equivalent antenna input power is less than six watts). Verizon is licensed to operate in the 700, 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, Verizon uses one RF channel per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. T-Mobile (also known as Omnipoint) is licensed to operate in the 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz frequency bands. In the 1900 MHz band, T-Mobile uses a maximum of eight RF channels in each antenna sector, with a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts per channel. In the 2100 MHz band, T-Mobile uses two channels per sector, with a maximum of 40 wafts of transmitter power per channel. In order to be as conservative as possible, the calculations for all the existing operators will be performed using the lowest of their respective antenna centerline heights, which is 70 feet 2 inches AGL. Compliance Analysis FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the ralative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest - and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach. The formula for street-level compliance assessment for any given wireless antenna operation is as follows: MPE% = (100 * TxPower * 10 (~.~=<-vdi.=~o) . 4 ) / ( MPE * 4~ * R2 ) where MPE% = 100 = TxPower = 10 (Grnax-Vdi~J10) .= MPE = R = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public factor to convert the raw result to a percentage maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (22 -- 4) FCC general population MPE limit straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 2 on the following page. height fi*om antenna bottom to 6.5' above ground level antenna 0 r 500 Ground Distance D fi'om the site Figure 2. MPE% Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level - which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas, Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as ~total MPE%', and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represent non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure, if all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit, Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas and sectorized coverage arrangements are used, the compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single (facing) sector, as the RF effects of directional antennas facing generally away are insignificant. The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power and maximum channel capacity. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-pement enhanced (increased) via a "perfect" field reflection from the ground itself. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur - and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operation, with the worst-case (maximum) result highlighted in bold in the last column. 10 Ground MetroPC$ AT&T Nextel T-Mobile V®rizon Total Dlst (ft} MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% 0 0.0105 0.0499 0.0031 0.0015 0.0313 0.0963 20 0.0021 0.1620 0.0034 0.0334 0.1047 0.3056 40 0.0562 0.1604 0,0211 0,0334 0.0961 0.3672 60 0,2372 0.1836 0,0099 0.0736 0.1160 0.6203 80 0.0443 0.6024 0.1280 0.1089 0.3401 1.2237 100 0.0520 1.0282 0.2166 0.1275 0.5812 2.0066 120 0,0635 0,3339 0.0596 0.0367 0.1934 0.6871 140 0~0364 0.1071 0,0202 0.0463 0,0616 0.2716 160 0.0359 0.4010 0.0807 0.0033 0,2283 0.7492 180 0.0315 0.8096 0.1467 0.1467 0.4678 1.6023 200 0.0214 0.7022 0,1299 0.1392 0.4046 1~3973 220 0.0406 0.3880 0.0790 0.0754 0.2206 0.8036 240 0.0517 0.2028 0.0433 0.0571 0.1144 0.4693 260 0.0397 0.0939 0.0170 0.0779 0.0544 0.2829 280 0.0155 0.0784 0.0068 0.1175 0.0484 0,2666 300 0.0143 0.1422 0.0149 0.1455 0.0868 0.4037 320 0,0225 0,2818 0.0435 0.1345 0.1660 0.6483 340 0.0334 0.2505 0.0387 0.1197 0.1476 0.5899 360 0.0398 0.4143 0.0776 0,0758 0,2383 0,8458 380 0.0381 0.3729 0.0699 0.0682 0.2145 0.7636 400 0.0346 0.5680 0.1177 0.0289 0.3219 1.0711 420 0.0276 0.5163 0.1070 0.0263 0.2926 0.9698 440 0.0192 0,7424 0.1584 0,0380 0.4188 1.3768 460 0.0177 0.6803 0,1451 0.0348 0.3839 1.2618 480 0.0122 0.6258 0.1335 0.0320 0.3630 1.1565 500 0.0112 0.5775 0.1232 0.0295 0.3257 1.0671 As indicated, the conservatively calculated, worst-case calculated result is 2.0055 percent of the FCC MPE limit - well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. A graph of the overall calculation results, shown on the next page, perhaps provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. As might be expected with such Iow calculated RF levels, the line representing the results barely rises above the graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. 11 120 100 ~. 80 60 ~ 40 ~ 2O COMPLIANCEASSESSMENT RESULTS Normalized FCC MPE Limit · Total MPE% Results 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) Compliance Conclusion According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and safe. As described, the analysis in this case shows that the maximum calculated RF level from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is 2.0055 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level from all the antennas at the site is more than 49 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. 12 CERTifiCATiON It is tha policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC Ri= compliance assassments ara reviewed, approvad, and signad by tha firm's Ohief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the antenna emissions at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RF exposure. Chief Technical Officer Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC 6/30/11 Date 13 Appendix A. Background on the FCC MPE Umit FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community - notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines speci~ MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions - and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 14 Frequency Range (F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MFE) ( mWIcm2) (mWIcn~) 0.3 - 1.34 100 100 1.34 ~ 3.0 100 180/F2 3.0 ~ 30 900 / F2 180 / F2 30 - 300 1.0 0,2 300 - 1,500 F / 300 F / 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mW/cm~) lO0 5.0 1.0 0.2 I I I I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 Occupational ......... General Public 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency (MHz) Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 15 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. FCC References 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (w'r Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Conceming Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commemial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-0t, August 1997. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, ~Questions and Answers About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition 4, August 1999. 16 AppENdix B. SUMMARy of EXpERT OuAIificATIoNs Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis: · 39 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure · Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 14,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 · Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,300 times since 1997 · Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as by the FCC Education: · BE.E. City College of New York (Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 · M.B.A., 1982, Faideigh Dickinson University, 1982 · Bronx High School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: · Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: · Edwards & Kelcey, VP - RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 · Bellcore, Executive Director - Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 · AT&T (Corp. HQ), Director - Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 · AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor - Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RFSafety/ · Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: ' · Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG · While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure · Have peen relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators~ and other consulting / engineering firms Other Background: · Author, Microwave System Engineering (AT&T, 1974) · Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993) · National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA) - former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 · Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and International Who's Who in Information Technology · Pub ished more~than 35 articles in industry ma~lazines 17 PROJECT NAME: zoNm: ZONE2: ZONS3: LOCATION: HAMLET: -- SCTM# 1000 - OWNER NAME: TEL# ( ) -- APPLICANT NAME: : TEL# (__) AGENT NAME: TEL# C__) EXISTING USE:. NOTICE: S/P 1~ 2ONFERENCE (Wi l'l-l~q 30 DAY: PROPOSED USE: REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: ZBA APPEAL DR N ~ECEIVED DATE: / / APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: RECEIVED: AMOUNT KECEIVED:$ $500JACRE &.10/SF, ~ED SP: $250. +.10/SF, AORIC SP: FLAT $500 FEE AMOUNT: ($ .00 X =$ sr=$ DAYS OF RECEIPT), PB ACCEPTED y OR N OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF'REVIEW) ] DEPARTMENT M~EET~G 100-254B3 (WITHIN 30 DAYS) / / / __/ / AGENCIES: (WlTH MAPS=W/P) :NEG DEC Y OR N, APPROVALS REQUIRED: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITrEE: LWRP COORDINATOR: BUILDING DEPARTMENT CER'r[FICATION: FIRE COMMISSIONERS: rowN ENGINEER APPROVAL, DEP.OF TRANSPORTATION: DOT._, DPW__, TOS.._. ~N3'y DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING: SUFFOLK C~ REFERRED DA*I scpPw___ NdTES tELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: ~LANS TO: CONDITIONAL FINAL:~/____/~, -----/ /..___. BUILDING DEPT /__._/ TOWN ENG ~ / NOTES Date February 24, 2012 Prepared By: Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title: MetroPCS~ Junge II. Action Review all staff comments and schedule for a determination. This amended site plan is for a proposed 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" monopole, and install related base equipment in a LI Zoning District on CR 48, Cutchogue. III: Analysis 1. January 9, 2012 Public Hearing a. No concerns raised 2. In response to Planning Board letter dated November 22, 2011 Applicant to provide written documentation and specific details explaining why the 97'6" height location that appears vacant on the existing monopole is not available: i. Submitted ii. Mr. Robert Toms (P.E., MTM Design Group) addressed the existing space and maintains that the presence of a ladder for access to the existing platform, pipe masts and a 24" square dish antenna mounted to the platform that extends into the vacant space are existing obstructions which collectively, prevent the applicant from co-locating an antenna at this height. If installed, the new antenna would have approximately 2" of separation from these structures. Applicant to provide propagation maps at the requested height of 97'6" comparing the coverage with the proposed extension height of 110'3" (centerline) at -85dBm and -95dBm. A written detailed description explaining the differences in coverage between the two heights: i. Submitted ii. Mr. Nicholas Balzano (radio frequency engineer) provided the propagation maps at the requested heights and concluded that antennas at the proposed height of 110'3" (centerline) would provide 3.183 square miles of coverage compared to 2.129 square miles at the existing 97'6" space (-85dBm). An additional 1.054 square miles of coverage would be possible at the proposed extension height. iii. Coverage at -95dBm provided reliable coverage of 7.005 square miles at 97'6" and 8.483 square miles for the proposed extensions; a difference of 1.478 square miles. Applicant to provide a photometric plan for all proposed lighting pursuant to § 172 of the Town Code. i. Not submitted ii. Proposed floodlights are included on the site plan to be mounted on base equipment unistruts. 3. CMS (consultant) comments after review of the above material: a. Propagation maps: it appears that to locate below 80ft. on the tower would reduce the applicant's service area in some spots by as much as one mile. Although we believe there may be available height above 80fl., the data provided confirms the need for a facility at this location and would provide the best coverage available for the applicant. As such, the proposed extension is justified and would not be significant. b. In light of the foregoing, the proposed extension does not impose a significant impact and this structure can accommodate a new wireless telecommunications facility at this location. As such, we believe that the application material as provided is complete. o Referral responses a. LWRP: The proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. b. Town Engineer: 1. The proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will not be greater than 5,000 SF. As designed, the proposed upgrade to the existing cellular communications equipment will not create a significant increase in storm water quantities that will be generated at the site. In addition, the existing site drainage system currently meets the minimum requirements for Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management. Therefore, at this time, additional site drainage is' not required The planning board shouM require a structural design certification for all additional antenna or related equipment that will be attached to the existing tower. The Site Plan drawings indicate that a Structural Design Analysis has been performed. A copy of this report should be submitted for the Planning Board Files. c. The Planning Dept. is waiting on responses from the Cutchogue Fire District and Southold Town Fire Marshall; no significant issues are anticipated. V: Staff Recommendations 1. Accept the reports submitted and technical consultant recommendations. Schedule this wireless application for a decision at the March 12, 2012 meeting. 2. With regard to the above comments from the Town Engineer, a structural design certification for all additional antenna or related equipment has been included in the application material. A structural analysis report was completed by David B. Granger, P.E. stating that the structure with existing, reserved and proposed are met with a sufficient capacity. Soutl d Planning Department Stalhi Report Site Plan Application Work Session - Completeness Date: Prepared By: September 12, 2011 Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title: Applicant: Date of Submission: Tax Map Number: Project Location: Hamlet: Zoning District: MetroPCS at Junge MetroPCS August 15,201 l 96.-1-19.1 21855 C.R. 48 Cutchogue LI-Light Industrial II. Description of Project Type of Site Plan: Acreage of Project Site: Building Size Existing site uses: Wireless Facility 1.03 acres/45,589s.f. 360s.f. Auto repair and Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility 1II: Completeness Review See attached checklist for Site Plan Requirements. IV: Analysis ( © = existing and proposed non-conformity) (1). Existing Monopole: a. Currently 100'-41" © b. Proposed pole extension = 108'-11" © c. Proposed top antenna = 112'-6' © (2) §280-67 8,: 280-74 maximum height - 80 feet B. Setbacks (*Wireless monopole to be considered principle structure*) (1) Front yard: 100ft. required a. 208.9' (existing equipment) b. 236.4' (pole) c. 210.9' (proposed equipment) (2) Rear yard: 70ft. required a. 22'-5" (pole) © b. 11'-1' (existing equipment) © c. 34'-7" (proposed equipment) © (3) Side yard: total required = 40fi. (one = 20fi) West a. 128'-3" (existing equipment) b. 110'-5" (proposed equipment) c. 142'-5" (pole) East a. 15'-2" (existing equipment) b. 42'-5" (pole) c. 70'-2" (proposed equipment) C. Landscaping (pgs. Z-3 & Z-4 of site plan) (1) Landscaping: required min. 25% Proposed screening to include 10' high Arborvitae (or approved equal) a. Existing: 46.8% b. Proposed: 47.7% (2) Lot coverage: required max. 30% a. Existing: 45.16% © b. Proposed: 45.62% © Additional proposed construction (1) 13'x 16' (208s.f.) concrete slab (2) MetroPCS storage cabinet Monopole timeline (1) Monopole radio tower built April 1992 (2) Easement to Verizon 2001 (3) Wireless communications antenna added May 2003 (4) Co-location of antenna November 2003 (5) "Antenna and equipment facility) May 2005 V: Staff Recommendations The application is incomplete and cannot be accepted for review until the following are received: a. Pursuant to §280-74(4)(a); required technical consulhant fee of $8,500 to be held in escrow -Applicant has provided $2,500 b. Photometric plan of proposed lighting c. List of current and existing carriers d. Provide information requested via letter from The Center for Municipal Solutions South d Planning Department Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness -Section 280-133 Project Name: MetroPCS at Junge Completed by: Brian Cummings Date: September 12,2011 A. Submission of a complete site plan application shalI COnsist of: (1) (2) A completed site plan application form. The site plan review fee, as specified in Subsection B below. Editor's Note: See now § 280-138, Fee schedule for site plan applications. (3) A completed environmental assessment form. (4) Nine copies of the site plan. (5) Four copies of a property survey, certified by a licensed land surveyor. B. Standards. Site plan design shall inclUde the following itemS: (1) Technical data: (a) The lot, block and section number of the property, taken from the latest tax records. (b) The name and address of the landowner on rec°rdi [1] The names and addresses of adjoining landowners. [2] The name and address of the applicant, if not the same as the landowner. (c) The name and address of the person, firm or organization preparing the map, sealed with the applicable New York State license seal and signature. (d) Date, graphic scale and North point, whether true or magnetic; if magnetic, show the date of reading. (e) A survey prepared by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. The site plan may reference a land surveyo(s map or base reference map. All distances shall be in feet and hundredths of a foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest 10 seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed one in 10,000. (f) The locations, names and widths of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines. If none exist within 500 feet of the subject property, indicate the distance to the nearest intersection with a public street. (g) A separate key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet, as shown on the latest tax records, at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet. (h) The location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks, reservations and areas dedicated to public use within or adjoining the property~ (i) A complete outline of other existing easements, deed Received Comment 8 provided 1 provided Verizon Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness (J) (k) (2) (a) Southi td Planning Department (3) restrictions or covenants applying to the property. Existing zoning, including zone lines and dimensions. Site plans drawn at the scale of one inch equals 20 feet. If all required information cannot be shown clearly on one plan, the information should be separated as follows: [1] Alignment and schedule plan. [2] Grading and drainage. [3] Landscaping. [4] Other, e.g., site utilities. Natural features: Received Existing contours with intervals of two feet or less, referred to mean sea level as per United States ~/ Geological Survey datum. (b)Boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, tidal bays, saltwater marshes, beaches and all freshwater bodies, including wetlands N/A and intermittent streams, perimeter boundaries of shoreline bluffs, dunes and beaches. (c) The location of existing natural features, including but not limited to natural drainage swales, watercourses, wooded areas and wetlands, as defined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Board of Trustees of Southold Town, marshes, N/A ponds, dunes, bluffs, beaches, kettleholes, escarpments, wildlife habitats, flood hazard areas, erosion-prone areas and trees of six inches in diameter at a point three feet above the trunk base. (d)The location of any existing cultural and historical features within 500 feet of the property boundaries. N/A Existing building structures and utilities: (a)The locations, dimensions and outlines of all buildings, as defined in § 280-4 of this chapter, and all uses of the ~/ site. (b)Paved areas, including parking areas, sidewalks and vehicular access between the site and public streets. ~J (c) The locations, dimensions, grades and flow directions of any existing culverts, waterlines or sewage disposal systems, as well as other underground and ~/ aboveground utility poles and utility lines within and adjacent to the property. (d) The location and use of all buildings and structures, including curbcuts, within 200 feet of the boundary of the ~J subject property. Comment Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness (4) (a) Southll d Planning Department Proposed eonstruetion: Received The location of proposed buildings or structural improvements, indicating setbacks from all property lines and x/ horizontal distances from existing structures. (b) The location and design of all uses not requiring structures, such as off-street parking and loading areas and pedestrian x/ circulation. (c) The location, direction, power level and time of use for any proposed outdoor lighting or public address systems, x/ (d) The location and plans for any outdoor signs must be in accordance with applicable sign regulations. .4 (e) The location and details of aprons, curbs, sidewalks, fencing (type and location), and grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours (on site and 200 ~] feet beyond the property line) and spot elevations for buildings and all structures, drainage calculations, details of drainage structures and watershed areas, where applicable. (f) Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site stormwater retention, in conformance with Chapter 161, N/A Highway Specifications. (g) The location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street tree plans, including type, material, size, quantity and .4 location. (h) The location of water and sewer mains, electrical service, cablevision and telephone installations, ground transformers, fire wells and fire hydrants and/or any alternate means of x/ water supply and sewage disposal and treatment. (i) Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing the proposed use of floor area. ~/ Notes: N/A= Not Applicable §280-74 (Wireless) Application fees and requirements B. (Wireless) Building permit application (a) { (e) .4 (b) .4 (f) .4 (c) (g) .4 (d) .4 (h) .4 C. (Wireless) Site plan application (~) .4 (8) (2) .4 (9) (3) .4 (tO) c-~] Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness Comment -Cabinet mounted to unistrut -Equipment cabinets -Pole extension -Light structure Z-4 -Need to include a photometric plan Z-5 -6fl. high chain link fence with barbed wire and privacy slats No Building South d Planning Department (4) ~/ (5) ,] (6) Not Submitted (7) x/ (1 1) N/A-structure does not meet Requirements (variance request) (12) ~] (13) (14) x/ D. (Wireless) Special exception application requirements. *: Not enough information submitted (i.e. propagation maps for alternate heights) Site Plan Application elements waivers: § 280-133 C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Board shall have the discretion to waive any or all of the requirements of this § 280-133 by resolution at a duly noticed public meeting, for those applications involving modifications to existing structures with no substantial change to the existing footprint, where the Planning Board determines that such modifications or any change in use will not require significant changes to existing major site design features, as well as applications involving uses strictly related to agriculture (but excepting retail winery operations), if it determines such requirements are not necessary to protect and maintain the public health, safety, or welfare and to further the objectives set forth in § 280-129. Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness 4 WJnser, Krist~/ From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Winser, Kristy Thursday, January 07, 2010 1:32 PM Randolph, Linda Lanza, Heather; Walter Cooper (E-mail); Verity, Mike 2009 Purchase Orders Linda Please notify Accounting that the following purchase orders should be cancelled for consultant estimates we received for Omni point, Cutchogue (CR 48) and for Omni point, Our Lady of Grace, F.l.( Omni point now referred as to T-mobile Northeast). FYI As you are aware, the above estimates were to assist with the review of their Building Department applications ( site plan use determination ) prior to amendments made to the new wireless code. Since such time, determinations have been made and forwarded to the Building Department therefore, once the applicant formally submits an application to for review 1o Planning, a new request for services to Walter Cooper will be made. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy,Winser~,town southold.ny.us TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Site Plan Name: MetroPCS at 21855 C.R. 48, Cutchogue Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 96 1 19.1 Amended Application Date: ~ / Original Application dated 7/2/20 2~Oll Other SCTM #s: Street Address: 21855 County Road 48 Distance to nearest intersection: West of Cox Lane Hamlet: Cutchogue Type of Site Plan: New x Amended If Amended, last approval date: / / Residential SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number,for the people below: Property Owner Arthur V. Junge Street 418 Moulton Hill Rd. City. Lyman State New Hainpshire~_zip 03585 Home Telephone Other 603-838-8982 Applicants: MetroPCS New York, LLC Street 5 Skyline Drive City_ Hawthorne Home Telephone State New York _Zip 10532 Other 914-593-8500 Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)*. Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP Street 36 North New York Avenue City Huntington State New York _Zip 11743 Office Telephone 631-425-4100 Other 631-425-4104 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 SECTION C: Site Data Proffosed construction type: __ X Property total acreage or square footage: Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: __Modification of Existing Structure Change of use 45,589 aodsq, ft. 360 aadsq, ft. Agricultural ls there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes If yes, explain: No Property Zoning District(s): Light Industrial Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 14 /,;Z/ / t 0 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes II'yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No X Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. last all existing property uses: List all proposed property uses: ()ti)er accessory uses: Auto Repair and Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Same as above Existing lot coverage: /4 K. lb % Proposed lot coverage: L/ff. 6, 2__ % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: 20 # of proposed spaces: {q5 C~c~a~Loading Berth: Yes __ No 'X Waterfront Data: s this property within 500' of a wetland area? Yes No X lfyesexplain: I, the undersigned, certif, y~t~fil~5 t't't~e a,,J:)o,,~,~'nformation is true. M ~ro PC S~N e.~/'ff,~ LC Signature of Preparer: B~q...~~ _ Date: Page 3 of 3 SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD WIRELESS FACILITY SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION AUG 1 ~' 2011 Application Name: MetroPCS at 21855 C.R. 48, Cutcho~ue Amended Application Date: August / 12 /20 11 Original Application Dated: July 2, 2010 Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000 - 96 1 19.1 Street Address: 21855 C.R. 48 Hamlet: Cutcho~ue Checklist of application materials required to be submitted (see Special Exception Application Requirements Handout or Town Code ~280-74 D ADDlicetion Materials for details) X One copy of the building permit application materials x Complete site plan application submission x Analysis of site location alternatives x Effort to co-locate documentation (if this is not a co-location) x* Special Exception Application Fee *MetroPCS Check No. 5543 in the amount of $1,000 was submitted on July 2, 2010 with original application form updated 7/7/20'10 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC For Approval to collocate public utility wireless telecommunications antennas on a proposed extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York District 1000 Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.l [MetroPCS Site No. NY7314] STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) AFFIDAVIT OF GOOD FAITH EFFORT AND SITE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED PURSUANT TO TOWN CODE SECTION 280-74D NICHOLAS BALZANO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. | am a radio frequency engineer for MetroPCS New York, LLC (hereinafter "MetroPCS'). As a radio frequency engineer, 1 am trained to identify service deficiencies iii MetroPCS wireless telecommunications network and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy these service deficiencies. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecolnmunications network in Suffolk County. I am fully familiar with MetroPCS's wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of MetroPCS's application for approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. Pursuant to this application, MetroPCS requests approval to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to a proposed extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment on the ground as depicted in the plans submitted herewith. 3. In keeping with the purpose and intent of Chapter 280 of the Code of the Town of Southold, MetroPCS seeks to locate its facility on an existing building or structure located withit~ an area of Southold, in which there is a significant service gap. 4. Southold Code 280-70D provides a priority listing for applicants seeking approvals to establish a public utility wireless telecommunications within the Town: the first priority is to locate a facility on an existing antenna support structure or other structure on Town-owned properties, including the right-of way ("Priority 1" proposals); the second priority is to locate a facility on an existing antenna support structure or other structure on other property in the Town ("Priority 2" proposals); the third priority is to erect a new antenna support structure on Town-owned properties ("Priority 3" proposals); the fourth priority is to erect a new antenna support structore on properties in the LI or LIO Zoning Districts ("Priority 4" proposals); the fifth priority is to erect a new antenna support structure on properties in the MI, Mll, B or HB Zoning Districts ("Priority 5" proposals); and the sixth priority is to erect a new antenna support structure on properties in the AC, R-40, R-80, R-120, R-200, R-400, LB, RO, RR, HD or AHD Zoning Districts ("Priority 6" proposals). 5. The instm~t proposal calls for the installation public utility wireless telecommunications antennas on a proposed extension on m~ existing monopole, i.e. a Priority 2 proposal. 6. On information and belief, there are no Town-owned properties in the subject area. 7. On ioformation and belied, the tallest existing utility poles within Town-owned right-of- ways are approximately 40'. 8. The existing monopole is the tallest structure in the search re'ea. I conducted studies of what coverage MetroPCS could provide if it located its antennas at the next available height on the existing monopole (60'). Such a proposal would still leave a substantial gap in coverage in the area and would not meet MetroPCS' coverage objectives in the area. As such, establishing a site on a shorter (40') utility pole would likewise leave a substantial gap in coverage in the area and would not meet MetroPCS' coverage objectives in the area. 9. There are no existing structures in the subject search area on Town-owned properties that would allow MetroPCS to establish a facility at the needed height. As such, there are no possible Priority I proposals available in this search area. 10. As noted above, I conducted studies of what coverage MetroPCS could provide if it located its antennas at the next available height on the existing ]nonopole (60'). Such a facility would provide approximately 1.58 square miles of reliable coverage at -85dBm. This would still leave a substantial gap in coverage in the area and would not meet MetroPCS' coverage objectives in the area. 11. The proposed extension will allow MetroPCS to provide approximately 3.183 square miles of reliable coverage at 85dBm. The proposed extension will allow MetroPCS to provide an additional 1.603 square ]niles of reliable coverage in the vicinity of the premises and will obviate the need for the construction of a new facility. 12. MetroPCS has determined that no other existing buildings or structures in the subject search area would be suitable for a facility that would be capable of eliminating the coverage gap in the area because each fails to meet the minimuln height requirement. 13. The instant proposal is the optimal site to meet the applicable Town Code requirenrents and also MetroPCS' radio frequency objectives in the subject search area. The proposed site represents the best and least intrusive means to provide reliable service in the area in question. 14. The only alternative to the instant proposal would be the construction of a new structure, such as a monopole. NI( TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC For Approval to collocate public utility wireless telecommunications antennas on a proposed extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York District I000 Section 96, Block I, Lot 19.1 [MetroPCS Site No. NY 7314] COLOCAT1ON AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) Dan Olmetti, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am the Vice President and General Manager of MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS") and am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances hereinafter set forth. 2. The business address of MetroPCS is 5 Skyline Drive, Hawthome, New York 10532. 3. I make this affidavit pursuant to Town of Southold Code Section 280-74D(2). 4. Upon information and belief, the subject monopole will be capable of accommodating colocation of additional antennas for at least one additional future user. Sworn to ~'efore me this XNI~LT~R~ P~ B L1C M K, LLC By:\_ Dan OTffgrfti, V~lce Pres-~dent and General Manager Tow'n of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes alt of Southold Town). lfany question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 96 1 19.1 AUG 13' 2011 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoard ~ Planning Dept. [] Building Dept. [] BoardofTrustees [] Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital ~ construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [--~ (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Natureandextentofaction: Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility consisting of panel antennas affixed to proposed 8'6" extension with T-arms on an existinq 100' monopole and the installation of related equipment within a 18'x20' compound area. Landscaped screening comprised of 10-ft arborvitaes will be placed around the fenced ground equipment. kocationofaction:21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York Site acreage: Present landuse: un-manned public utility wireless communications facility Present zoning classificati0n: Light Industrial (LI) District If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) (d) Application number, if any:_ Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No~-] lfyes, which state or federal agency? FCC DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southoid that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. Sec LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [--] No [-~ Not Applicable The proposed undertaking is an extension and collocation on an existing wirelesS telecommunications facility and will make efficient use of existing Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Atthch additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. MinlmiTe loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes [] No ~-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes ~ No Ir]Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. Sec LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes [] No~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [-~ Yes ~] No ~ Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Ye~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes [-'] No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Atlach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [-~ Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Created on 5/25/05 11:20 AM Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility consisting of paneJ antennas affixed to proposed 12' extension on existing 100' monopole and the installation of related equipment within a :18' x 20' compound area." DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy I. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The adverse effects of development are mitigated by collocating the proposed telecommunications facility on an existing tower. With regards to community considerations, based on the above, the proposed undertaking meets the longstanding planning goals of the Town of Southold which are to "reflect the interest in preserving and enhancing the natural and built enw'ronment and providing opporZun/ties for a level o~'growth and expansion of the economic base that is compatible with the existing scale of- development, availability of- water, existing sensitive environment of the Town and its historic heritage." Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. EBI evaluated whether the stipulations contained within Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Col/ocation of Wire/ess Antennas (the "Collocation Agreement") allow MetroPCS New York, tic to construct the proposed facility without consulting with the New York State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The Collocation Agreements exclusionary consitions for SHPO consultation do not apply to this project because the collocation will involve a substantial increase to the size of the existing compound. In a letter dated October :1, 2009, EBI requested the New York SHPO to concur with its conclusion that no historic properties are located within the visual Area of Potential Effect (APE) of the proposed facility. EBi's letter, which was prepared on the Collocation Submission Packet FCC Form 62:1 contained photographs, project plans and location maps of the installation for the SHPO's review. On October 7, 2009, EBI received comments from the Town of Southold Planning Department. EBI submitted these comments to the New York SHPO on November 4, 2009. These comments have been taken into consideration and EBI's determination remains "No Historic Properties / No Effect" on historic properties. As of May 16, 2010, the thirty-day comment period stipulated by the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act Review Process (NPA) has expired. In EBl's correspondence to the SHPO, EBI determined that the proposed project would have no effect upon historical resources listed in or potentially eligible for listing in the National Register as no historic properties are located within the visual APE of the proposed facility. Based on the lack of response from the SHPO and in accordance with the procedures set forth in the NPA, EBI assumes concurrence with this conclusion. Additionally, on April 16, 2010 E81 submitted revised project plans to the NY SHPO regarding the change in location of the proposed compound expansion. This alteration was taken into consideration and EBl's determination remained "No Historic Properties / No Effect" on historic properties. As of May 16, 2010, the thirty-day comment period stipulated by the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act Review Process (NPA) has also expired for the SHPO addendum letter. Based on the above, the proposed undertaking will protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of $outhold. Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Iqinimize introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. The adverse effects of the proposed project are mitigated by collocating the proposed telecommunications facility on an existing tower. Of importance, no microwave dishes will be installed. In addition, screening/fencing will be designed in accordance with the Town of Souchold Wireless Code. B. Restore deteriorated and remove degraded visual components. C. Screen components of development which detract from visual quality. Screening/fencing will be designed in accordance with the Town of $0uth01d Wireles~ Code. Use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. The proposed proiect involves the collocation of antennas and equipment to an existing telecommunications facility. As such, is compatible to existing scale, form and material. Ee Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality:. h Preserve existing vegetation which contributes to the scenic quality of the landscape. 2. Allow for selective clearing of vegetation to provide public views without impairing values associated with the affected vegetation. 3. Restore historic or important designed landscapes to preserve intended or designed aesthetic values. 4. Restore or add indigenous vegetative cover that presents a natural appearance. The proposed undertakJng will not disturb existing vegetat/0n. F. Improve the visual quality associated with hamlet areas. N/A G. Improve the visual quality of historic maritime areas. N/A H. Protect the visual interest provided by active water-dependent uses. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment to an existing telecommunications facility. Visual interest provided by active water-dependent uses will not be adversely impacted. L Anticipate and prevent impairment of dynamic landscape elements that contribute to ephemeral visual qualities. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment to an existing telecommunications facility. Dynamic landscape elements that contribute to ephemeral visual qualities will not be affected. Protect visual quality associated with public lands, including public transportation routes, public parks and public trust lands and waters. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment at an existing telecommunications facility. The proposed undertaking will not introduce further negative visual elements that would cause an interruption of vistas important to the character of the area, h Limit water surface coverage or intrusion to the minimum amount necessary. N/A 2. Limit alteration of shoreline elements which contribute to scenic quality. N/A K. Protect visual quality associated with agricultural land, open space and natural resources. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment to an existing telecommunications facility. The visual quality of agricultural land, open space and natural resources will be protected. I. Maintain or restore original landforms except where altered landforms provide useful screening or contribute to scenic quality. Existing landforms will not be altered. 2. Group or orient structures during site design to preserve open space and provide visual organization. Ail supportJng structures will be located within a proposed equipment compound adjacent to the existing compound. 3. Avoid structures or activities which introduce visual interruptions to natural landscapes including: a) introduction of intrusive artificial light sources; Intrusive artificial lighting is not proposed. b) fragmentation of and structural intrusion into open space areas; open space areas wilt not be affected c) changes to the continuity and configuration of natural shorelines and associated vegetation The natural shoreline will not be affected Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the site area indicates that the property and the surrounding areas are not located within a Special Flood Hazard Areas inundated by 100-Year Flood. Policy S. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. N/A Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment at an existing telecommunications facility and will not impact the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. According to the "Guidelines for Consultation with NY Natural Heritage regarding Proposed Collocations of Telecommunication Facilities on Existing Towers and Buildings", issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)- Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources, dated May 2009, for communications facilities projects that involve "New or existing towers, antennae, and associated equipment installed at a location currendy wholly occupied by lawn, pavement and/or gravel," the NYSDEC does not "have any records of rare species or significant natural communities which will be of concern in relation to the proposed projects." Inasmuch as the proposed project is located on land previously disturbed, rare species or significant natural communities will not be affected by development of the proposed undertaking. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. The proposed undertaking will not generate air pollution. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. The proposed undertaking is un-manned and will not generate solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. N/A Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. N/A Policy I I. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. KI/A Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment at an existing telecommunications facility, thereby protecting agricultural land. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. N/A 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whethe[ a ~oroj~ct or ~fion may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant's not a ways easy to answer. Frequeh~, ther~ are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable, It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowtedge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature; yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: I I Part I I I Part 2 I I Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: DA, project not any large important impact(s) and, therefore, one not a The in is have significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. DB~ Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page I of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please comp]eta the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Pads 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Cellular Tower Compound Expansion / MetroPCS # NY7314 Location of Action {include Street Address, Municipality and County) 21855 County Route 48, Cutchogue (Town of Southold), Suffolk County Name of ApplioantJSponsor MetroPCS New York, LLC Address 5 Skyline Drive City / PO Hawthorne State NY . Zip Code 10532 Business Telephone (914) 593-8500 Name of Owner (if different) Arthur V. Junge Address 4 t 8 Moultun Hill Road City / PO Lyman Business Telephone State NH Zip Code 03585 Description of Action: Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility consisting of panel antennas affLxed to proposed 8'6" extension with T-unns on an existing 100' monopole and the installation of related equipment within a 18' x 20' compound area. Landscaped screening comprised of 1 O-foot arborvitaes will be placed around the fenced ground equipment. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A, if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial []Forest []Agriculture []Other [] Residential (suburban) [] Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.005 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, ear[h or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) Mix of manicured ~'ass a~d bare soil PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres 0.005 acres 0.005 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: r~well drained 100 % of site D Poorly drained __% or site D Moderately well drained % of site. If any agdcu]tural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see I NYCRR 370), 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? I I Yes a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) [~No 5, Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: D0-10% ]00% D10- 15%__% D 15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? [] Yes [] No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes []No What is the depth of the water table? < 10 (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ]Yes [] No DYes []No 10, Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing OPportunities presently exist in the project area? Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? to; as per NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper website and correspondence. i dentif~ each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? DYes [~No Describe: I 13. Is the project site presently used by tho community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes IXINo ( ~/es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?. DYes r~lNo DYes [~]No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project ama: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary I 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17, Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [] Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? No r~TM •No 18. is the site located in an agricultural district cerLified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~lYes ~'lNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 E]Yes r~uo 20, Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B, Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). ~]Yes [] No a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.005 acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: i~/A acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. __ f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Initially 0.005 acres. O.OOS acres ultimately. 12 % 1/month (upon completion of project)? (For Routine Maintenance) Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ]0 height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes •No r~N/A If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Will topsoil be stockpiled rot reclamation? [] Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 13 width; ~ 16 length. N/A ft. [For steel frame around cabinets 0 tons/cubic yards. 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes r~lNo If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: < ! months, (including demolition) if multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month year. d, Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [] No 9. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0__.~.. 1 1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes If yes, explain: 12, Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b, Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes [] No Number of jobs generated: during construction 4; after project is complete [~No 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body ncrease or decrease by proposal? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any potion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [] Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No ]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month?__, tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? E]Yes D No Page 6 of 21 e, If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? r'lYes ~INo a, If yes, what is the anticipated rate of' disposal? tons/month, b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes [] No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes []No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes []No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) A minimal increase in electricity can be anticipated. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type City, Town, Village Board ]Yes [] No Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes D No Special Use Permit Site Plan City, Town Zoning Board DYes [] No City, County Health Department [] Yes [] No Other Local Agencies DYes [] No Other Regional Agencies OYes [] No State Agencies []Yes [] No Federal Agencies [] Yes [] No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes If Yes, indicate decision required: D Zoning amendment ]Site plan No r'-I zoning variance ]Special use permit D New/revision of master plan ]Resource management plan ]Subdivision D Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? LI - Light Industrial 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? I All uses must conform to the Town's Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedule. 4. What s the proposed zoning of the site? No changes are proposed. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? I N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [] Yes I 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Light Industrial; landscape company, municipal transfer facility, automotive repair ~lNo 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of and, how many lots are proposed'> N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? F~l Yes [] No Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? []Yes I lNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? LJ Yes I 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes I D. Informational Details ]No DYes [] No I-I'o Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information Applicant/Sponsor Name Signature ~rovided above is true to the best of my knowledge. If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If im pact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? No O YES O Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. O O DTM O.° O O OYes OMo Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. O O OYes Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. O O DYes D.o O O OYes ONo O O OYes I-I.o Page 11 of 21 Construction or expansion of a santary landfill Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: I 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) EpO []YES Specific land forms: I Impact on Water Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E]NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: I Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [].o I--lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: Page 12 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No ]Yes [] No []Yes •.o ]Yes DNa r'~ Yes DNa []Yes DNa I ]Yes DNa []Yes DNa DYes •~a I Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater qualit7 or quantity? ON• []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes DNo []Yes •No []Yes •.o []Yes I'-l.o []Yes •.o []Yes ~.o []Yes [].o []Yes [].o DYes DNo []Yes r"lNo DYes []No E~Yes [] No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change hood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: I IMPACT ON AIR W~II Proposed Action affect air quality? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I--INo []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []Yes ONo [] DYes DNo [] []Yes ONo OYes ONo [] DYes [] DYes •No [] DYes DNo [] []Yes []No [] DYes DYes ]No ]No No Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat Application of Pesticide or herbicide mere than twice a year, ether than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: I 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: I IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? [] No []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 lhe Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agdcultural land. lbo Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than t 0 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land~ 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change EYes ENo Eyes ONe DYes []No I DYes [] No []Yes •No ]Yes DNo I DYes []No DYes •No []Yes ENo Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) [3"0 n~S Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: I IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes DNo DYes [] No OYes DNo r-lyes ONo DYe, I"1 No OYes DNo OYes [] No Dyes I--INo Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. VVill proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? [] ,O []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? D.o DYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change []Yes DNo [] OYes [].o [] []Yes DNo [] []Y~ 121.o Examples that would apply to celumn 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: [] [] [] [] DYes •No [] OYes []No [] []Yes DNo []Yes DNo [] OYes DNo Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems, Other impacts: I IMPACTONENERGY 16. WilJ Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? DNo []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: I NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [].o []YES Examplee that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: Page 18 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DY~ •No DY~ DNo Oyes DNo ]Yes [] No []Yes []No ]Yes []No []Yes [] No Dyes []No I-lyes []Yes []No 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. VV~II Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [].O []YES Propoaed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous aubatanoea (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level diacharge or emission. Propoaed ^ction may result in tha burial of "hazardous wastes' in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonoua, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or moro gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in tho axcavaflon or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for tho disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: I IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? [].O []YES Examplea that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by moro than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community, Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) O [] O [] [] O [] [] O [] [] [] OY~ ON• O []Yes •No [] OYes ON• [] []Yes ON• [] OYes OHo O DYe~ [] OYes O []Yes ON• [] DY~0.o [] []Yes ON• [] DYes Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: I 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? I-I.o r-lyEs 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] OYes ONo [] E]Yes E]No If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS ReSponsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: The probability of the impact occurring The duration ofthe impact Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value Whether the impact can or will be controlled The regional consequence of the impact Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 DESIGN= GROUPz ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING · PO BOX 3 · HAVLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 · TEL: 732 888 6210 · FAX: 732 847 4335 · September 7, 2010 Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Planning Board Reference: Metro PCS Application 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Section: 96, Block: 1, Lot: 19.1, Zone: LI Metro PCS Project#: NY7314, MTM#: 09MPSTS014 To Whom It May Concern: With reference to the above noted site regarding the drainage and grading at the existing telecommunication facility on the property, please note the following. The existing native soil in the area of the proposed equipment is pervious and comprised of sand and gravel and would not pose any drainage problems. The proposed equipment will be mounted on a new 13' x 16' (208 Square Feet) concrete slab adjacent to the existing fenced equipment compound. The concrete slab will allow for any potential precipitation to pass to the existing pervious surface. Landscape screening is proposed around the perimeter of the equipment area. The impact of the 208 SF of impervious surface created with the proposed concrete slab in comparison to the overall size of the existing property and the existing grading and drainage will be negligible. As depicted on the construction documents submitted concurrently, the proposed equipment area is to be mildly re-graded and landscaped such that it will be relatively level with the adjacent existing surrounding areas. No retaining walls or radical changes in surface features or runoff are proposed. If you st office,~.~ cc: Metro PCS File questions, or need any additional information, please feel free to contact our TOWN OF SOUTltOLD TOWN ~ SO~O~, ~ 11~1 ~: (~1) ~u~o~o~or~ Approvod ,20 .... Disapproved F..npiration ~ 20 Pg, RMIT NO. BUILDING PF~ APPLICATION C~IST N.Y~.D.~C. ~m.W~ As~sant l~'m ~ ~y for ~p~:. ~ ~: Re, N~ Hu~ & ~1~ LLP 36 N. New Yo~ Ave., H~ ~ 11743 ~ 631~25~1~ · APFt CAT ON .O' n G eF. gMrr INSTRUCTIONS a. This applL~tion MUST be ~Plelnly ~llod in by ~q~-wdu~r c~ in ink and sutanit~l m ~ B~in~ ~ ~ 4 sets of plan~ ncom~ plot plan ~o rode. Fee aoc~ding msc, lmdule. b. Plot pisa sbov~g loc~ea of lot md of buiklJngs m Pmab~ m]~i~t° adj°in~g pmai~ e~ publi° ~ ~ d. Upon appmvnl of ~is apl~lionlion, 1t~ Building Imge~-- - -- will mu~ a Building Pmnit t° 11~ applimmt' Such a lmrmat issues a Certif:~m~ of 0~q~.. · . ............ ...a ...m.a. 12 months aflar fha dam of i~S~ Of ii~ no~ 06~1 ~F ..... wm~,~ .... APPLICATION 18 I-II~I~J~Y MADB lo ~lm l~!ai~ Dqman~nt fo~ ~ isauan~ of a Builalng Permit pursuant to Building ~ Otdinan~ offl~ Town og~mltmld, Suffolk County, N~w York, and oth~ applkable Laws, Otdimnm~ or applicant agrees to comply with all al~ laws, ontinanm~ bUiMmg ~ homing c, ada, and t~gulali~ and ' authorized inspectors on p~mi~S and in b~!ai~ ~-n~nmy ~ MetroPCS New York, LLC (Sianamu of qnai~at at ns~, ifa .~a~s~tion) 5 Skyline Drive, Haw~hom~, NY 10532 State whcthe, r applicant is owns, lea--~-, agent, arc, hi~, engin~r, general contractor, ~c,~ plumber or builder Applican~ is Lessee N amc of owner of premise~ _An~. ur V. Junge ........... ,'- i'.; ~-, ~ /71 (As on tn~ ma rou or m~at omo). By: . ~._ ,,... · (Name and title of coi'por~ om~rj Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians Lieeme No. Other Trad¢'s License No. N/A I. Location ofhnd on which propo~d work will be do~: 21855 County Road 48 House Number ~t County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 96 Subdivision Filed Map No. 2. State exist/n~ use and .occ~mcy.of premises and htcnded nsc and occupancy of pwpo~d onnstmction: a. Existing .use and oc~ul~ney C~mme~cial and public utility witless telecommmlicafioDs facil/t~ b. In~md~d use ~ ooc~q~mnoy Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility 3. Natu~ of work (e, heok which ~aplk:able): New BuiMi,,~ Addition- Alteration Reoair Removal ' . Den~olitioD 'Ot~r Wodl: Applicant propose to exte~..d the existing mono'_~o~ and colocate its i~blic utility wireless tel.,eco ,mmuni~ti~.ns ~t~..,o~ the extension, and install rclatdi eouiDml:~ on the 8/ound, all as depicted in me plans suvnntt~ nerewim. 4. EstirhatedCost. ~mo. oonno . tee 5. Ifdweiling~number0fdwdlingonit~ N/A Numberofdwelling unita on each floor If §hinge, number of cars 'Commercial and public utility wireless telecommunication 6. If business, commeroial or ~ oe, cutmn~, specify ~,h.-e and ext~m of ea~ type of us~facility 7. Dimensions of. exiatingstmctm'ea, if any: Front Rear .Depth Height. .Numbe~of ~torie$ * Existing 100.5'+/- monopole Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions:* Front Rear Depth Height Number of Slor~,~s * 109'+/- monopole with relocated · ' lighming rod thereon 8. Dimensions of entire new r, onstn~ion: Front R. enr Depth Height / 45,51~ squa~ feet 9. Size of lot: Front~ Number of 8torles* Proposed S.r+/: extension to existing monopole and proposed 360 square foot equipment area Name of Former Owner · Timothy Scott Gray. 10. Date of Purohnse 4/6/1987 . 11. Zone or use district in which ptemise$ ~re s~m,,,*,~i Light Industrial District 12. Do~ proposed construction violate any zoning hw, ordinsm:e er reg"!~on? YE8 .-NO x. 13. Will lot be re-gtadedg YE8 ._NOX Willexoe~fillbe~frompremiaea?YESX..NO. 418 Moidton Hill Rd~ 14. NamesofOwn~.ofpmnises AzthurV. Junse ~t/~II~laL~NH03585 .PhoneNo. 603-838-8982 Nameof.,A~0h/~ MTMC~,~ienOrmm. lnc. · ,Aa:idI~P.O. Box3 Hazl NJ. No 732-888-6210 Name of Contm~ Add~-- o~z~u' ~noneNo. 15 a. I$ this property within 100 ~:et ofl tidltlwetland or a freshwater wetland? b. lsthisproperty.within300feetofatidalwetlan~ Yl~ NO X . ' * IF YES, D.F~C. PERMrrSMAYBRREQUIRI~. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with ao~urale ~ plan and distan~a to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property in at 10 feet ~r below, mnat provide lopographic~! data on s~vey. 18. Are there any oovenams ~md r~, '~tlous wht~ t~ t° this Pr°Pe~Y? * Y~ X NO__ * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. STATE oFNEW YORK) SS: COON'FY OF~~Dy' Oqan~ of h~divid~ ~ ~m) ~oow n"~:, ' · (S)He is the Lessee / Applicant ~ (Con~a~=, A~nt, Con~ae otto=. ~_ pe. rfonned in th~ manner set fora in fl~ applicafi°n filed thnmwith' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 www. northfork.net/Southold/ Examined ,20 Approved ,20__ Disapproved a/c Expiration ,20__ PERMIT NO. BUILDING FEYtMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Do you have or need the following, before applying? Board of Health 4 sets of Building Plans Planning Board approval Survey. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Contact: Mail to: Phone: Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date ,20 INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. N~~°t~MMU OM NICATIONS By: (Signature of applicant or name, ifa corporation) 3500 Su0rise Highwa Great River, NY 11739 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Lessee Nameofownerofpremises Crown Atlantic Company LLC (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer umnipoint Communications By: (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers LicenseNo. Electricians LicenseNo. Other Trade's License No. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 21855 P_nun*y po~_d 48 House Number Street Cutchoguo Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section Subdivision (Name) 96 Block 1 Filed Map No. Lot 19.1 Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Existing monopole b. Intended use and occupancy Public utility 3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Repair Removal Demolition 4. Estimated Cost $15,000.00 Fee 5. If dwelling number of dwelling units n/a If garage, number of cars n/a Addition Alteraion O~er Wok X Upgrade (Description) $100.00 (To be paid on filing this application) Number of dwelling units on each floor n/a 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Height Number of Stories Rear .Depth Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Depth Height. Number of Stories Rear 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Height. Number of Stories Rear .Depth 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated Light Industri al 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO x 13. Will lolrbe re-graded? YES__ NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES__ NO X 21855 County rd 48 14. Names of Owner of premises Arthur Junqe Address Cutchoque Phone N~.~~- NameofArchitectWilliara F Collimq Ad~l~/ssle~''"'-~*'- ....... v ~ Orph°neN° (631)689-8450 Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO x * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. NO x l 6. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF Eric Engen being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named, (S)He is the Lessee (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sw°~.[°tefc';joe;h %%.k.~ _/~ 20 /Notary Publi~ / LYNANNE HUERTAS NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF NEW YORK NO 01NH6203459 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUN~ MY COMMtSSION EXPIRES APRIL ~, 20 I By:OMNIP0/~T~/~~UNICATIONS SignaureofApplicant Eric Engen APpLICANI~ AFFtDAVfF :SLATE OF NEW YORK COUf'T[Y OF S~ 'c/o 5 Skyline.Driy. e,~ Hawthorne, NY 10532 in the State of New York, and that he is the owner cC the. above properly, or that he is the ~/~ J' ~ of the kessee~ ~MetroPCS New York,.LLC~ ., n'ltle) (Spec'tf~ whether Partnership or Corp,) being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at which is herebY making application~ that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on'the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been dearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan tnfrlmges upon any duly flied plan whloh has not been abandoned botli as to lots and.~s to roads;'that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved; will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approvaI of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvem¢nts will be Installed in strict accordance With the pans submitted. /~3¢/;/ S / - MetroS-CS New York, LLC. (Partner or ~;orporate Officer and Tide) Sworn to me this ¢l ,~* .day of ~7_~_,.,.~_ (Notary Public) B~AN~'LAVE~L~ NOTARY pUBLIC, Sp~ew Yo~ No, 01LA6Uz~¢u CommmSlOn Exp,:es JCY 19 z ~ ~ ~goo9 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (As to Applicant) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics nrohibits conflicts of interest on the vart of town officers and emolovees. The nurpose of this form is to nrovide information which can alert the town of oossible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: MetroPCS New York, LLC (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person s o~ company s name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Moofing Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If "Other", name the activity.) X - Site Plan Approval Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO j If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): __.A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); __.C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or __D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHiP Form TS I Submitted this ~. Signature Bv: ( Print Name' ~.~ ? 200 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (As to Owner) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics t~rohibits conflicts of interest on the rmrt of town officers and emolovees. The ourpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. _ ~ (L s name, first name, middle initial, un~.~s you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If "Other", name the activity.) X - Site Plan Approval Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, mamage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a parmership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YEs No X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Sonthold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship beg~veen yourself (the applicantTagentTrepresentative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); __C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or ___D) the aclual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC At the premises: 21855 County Road 48 North side of County Road 48, west of Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) AUTHORIZATION OF OWNER /~ tr///~t/( ~/. ~ ,_J~ x - , being duly swom, deposes and says: I am the owner in fee of the premises known as Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 (the "Premises" hereafter), and do hereby authorize MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS' hereafter), and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal approvals as may be necessary for constructing or installing on the Premises such antennas, support structures, and related equipment as MetroPCS may require for the establishment of its public utility wireless telecommunication facility. As such, I will fully cooperate with MetroPCS and its agents in obtaining any required Approvals. Swom to before me this /I day of 50)~/ ,2009 NOTARY/PUBLIC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Re: Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLC for Metro PCS New York, LLC 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 DATE: April 21, 2010 Please take notice that your application dated March 31,2010 For permit to colocate a wireless facility & install equipment at Location of property: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY CountyTax Map No. 1000- Section 96 Block I Lot 19.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the tbllowing grounds: The proposed co-location in the kl District is a permitted use. The construction requires Planning Board site plan review & special exception approval per Section 280-72 of the Town Code. Authorized Signature CC: file, Planning Board Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net E×amined ,20__ Approved 20 Disapproved a/'~ ~Dc/~ ,~t} e~t~0 '- Expiration ,20.__ PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Do you have or need the following, bafore applylng? Board of Health ' 4 sets of Building Plau~ Plamfing Board approval Survey Cheek Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Flood Permit Storm-Water Assessment Form Contact: A~orneys for Applicant. Mail to:Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP ~ N0rth New York Avenue untm~ton. NY 11743 Phone:. 631-425-4100 ~-~ ~ ~ E ~ Building Inspector ~. This ap~g~e comnl~ly filled ~ by ~pewriter or in ink and submi~ed to ~e B~ldi~ Inspector wi~4 . sets o~ ~-~, ::;'~.~[~'plO[ pmn to sc~o. Fee according to schedule· b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on promises, relationshi~ to adjoining promises or public s~eets or areas, and wate~may~. c. The work covered by ~is applicafion may not be commenced befo~ issu~co of Building Permk. d. Upon approv~ of~is applica~on, tho Bulldog ~pe*tor will issue a Building Permit m ~o applic~t. Such a permit shall be kept on fl~e premises available for ~spe~ion t~oughout ~, work. e. No building shall be o~upied or used ~ whole or in p~ for ~y p~pose what so ever until ~e Bulling Inspector issues a Ce~aificate of Occup~y. f. Ev*~ building permk shall expire ff~e work au~orized h~ not commenced within 12 mon~s a~er the date of issuance or h~ not been completed wi~in 18 mont~ ~om such ~. If no zoning mendmen~ or o~er mgulafiom ~ect~g the prope~ haw been enacted ~ ~o int~im, ~e Building hspeetor may authofi~, in wrifing~ ~e ~tension of~e pe~t for an addition ~ months. Therefor, a new permit s~ll be req~red. APPLICAT2ON IS ~BY ~DE to ~e B~lding Depament for the ~su~ of a Bulldog Pe~it p~u~t to ~e Building Zone Ordinate of the Town of 8outhold, S~olk Count, New Yor~ ~d other applleable Laws, O~ces or Regulations, for ~e co~,uetion of bull&rigs, ~difions, or alterations or for removal or demolition ~ here~ d~ibed. ~e applicant agrees to comply wi~ all applicable laws, oidin~oes, bulldog code, housing cede, ~d regulafiom~ ~d to admit authorized inspecto~ on premises and in bulldog for necessa~ inspeetiom. MetroPCS New York, LLC (Signature of applicant or name, if a ~ Linfited Liability Company 5 Skyline Drive Hawthorne, NY 10532 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Lessee Name of owner of ~remises Arthur V. Junge ~ '~i~' Company (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If.applJg.a.~t.isA'~t~l~i~!isign~atu~e~fdtllY authorized officer ' ~ame a~ffti~of~.offic~ ~ Builders License No. Plumbers License No: N/A Elec~icians License No. Other Tmde's License No. N/A 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue. New York House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. I000 Sec'don Subdivision 96 Block 1 Filed Map No. .! 2. State existing use and occupancy,of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing u?e and occupancy Commercial and public utility wireless telecommunications facility b. Intenddd rise and occupancy Same as existin~ 9. 10. Nature of work (cheek which applicable): New Building Addition · Alteration Repair Removal · . Demolition 'Other Work Affix public utility wireless telecommunications ant~nnaa to.nro¢ose~t 12,.~ extension on.qxisting,100' monopole and install related (Besorintion) equipment on the grounfl aS aepll:teum the plans suemltten nerewlm. Estimated Cost $ J. 00. 000. aa Fee ~ __ ' ' (To be paid on filing this application) If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number .of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars Co_na3e~eial. a.nd public · . . . t If bus,ness, commermal or mined occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. ~e~o~m~[e~il~ons : ' ~aclAlty Dimensions of. existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Sto~es * Existing 100' monopole Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front ~, /Proposed eqmpment w~th~n 18 x20 cfmpou~ Dimensions of entire ne'.w construction:' Front . Rear , Height Number of Stories. i , 45,589 square feet Depth t Size of lot{Front, Rear . Date of Purchase 4/6/1987 Name of Former Owner ' Timothy Scott Olay 11. 12. 13. 14. Names of Owner,of premiees A~thur V. Junge Name of Architect MTM Design Cn'oup Inc. Name of Contractor Zone or use district in which premises are situated Lisht Industrial District Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO x Will lot be m-graded? YES NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES 'X . NO ~. 418 M6ulton Hill Rd. Ad.ess Lyman, NH 03585 ~honeNo. 603-838-8982 Address PO Box 3,Hazier, NJ 07730Phone No. 732-888-621~0 Address Phone No, 15 a. Is this property 5vithi;a 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES. NO x * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PER/VIITS MAY BE REQLrlRED. b. Is this proPerty.within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES ' NO x * iF YES, D.E.C. pERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to some, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at I0 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any coven, ants hud res,[riefions with r0spee~ to this property? * YES .~ NO * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) / . SS: COUNTY OF{~J~afA~'~ ~.t4~,- ~'~ 0 i r~ ~/,~' , . being daly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the appliramt (Name of individual signing contract) above named, (S)He is the Lessee/Applicant (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; tha~ ail statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. 20D -- Sig~mro of~pplicant FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: ~/ / ~ / Project Name: .//~ Project Address: Date Sent: /-~ / % /(i-) Suffolk County Tax Map Ne.:1000- qj ~ Request: ~',_~z~ - O ~ ~/~"~Z/f~- / - /9 I Zoning District: ~-~ (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: --/- ~_z/_~ ~~ ff~gnature of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: Comments: J~ /~ a/~ t,'lc Final Determination Date: / / Decision: Signature of Planning_~e~_t~_S:[aff Reviewer i~. ~ ' i: IJ w~ !~ APR-9 2010 i.! , glnn~h ~r~. nf R~ildina In.~nRc, tnr (1) ~ItL~g it Sli0_NaHiu Potnt_Ao4d( C~tch~gunr H#v York ~1935 ~o11~%ng c~n~w m~ roitz%~t%onw~ ~ (KW ~ COV 10/1t} All that certain plo~, p~e~e o: peres! of land, with the bU~4~ngl ar~ improvements thereon erected, situses, lying and being ae ~utahogue, particularly bounded and described Il follower N~GINNING at n poise on t~e northwest lena of Middle ~oad, tC.~. 4l) feet more ~r Isle southwesterly along said l/no from Cox's Lena, enid point being the southeast corner o2 the premtlss herein disoribmdend the IO{tA- RUNKXNG ?KINCS aXonS th~ nh~%hwas~ line o! M~ddle I~d, (C.N. 4l}t RUNNING ?N~NC{ along said lend North l0 degrees 94 I~tnutos }0 aeoonde Welt, 25~.48 ~e~t to land of th9 TOMS of lOUthold/ RUNNING THZNCBalong laid land North 33 degrees 14 minutes 00 seoondl bt, 188.15 feet to land of the party o2 tho first part/ The DECL&~T represents he As Ivdre ~t the require~n~l ~et forth in in ~nerlhlp or a change in the operation, the D~C~ or him amalgam or ',~ (ICDNI 0~# COy lO/it) ~ set forth ~hHo coveasnts, SgZHmeats end ~eAn .~XX ~ eonet~ to ~ Xn ~X~on to e~ ~t Afl ~roga~A~ or l~l~e~Xon u~n shy ~e~llt/onl Afl eff~ at t~ t~ of ea~utAofl of mn~, or Xnco~ra~ ~r~tn i~ ~hey I~ ~ ~o ~ fully H~ forth. ($¢M~BNCOV lO/IS) luffoLk or shy off~oer or ~%~ ~ or ~ ~ t~ ~r of t~ pr~ee. I. If any .~tlofl, oubw~tA~, ~ragraph, ~%aue, phrwoe or pz~%aAofl of t~ae e~o~flto a~ ad3udg~ %%%~a%, ~nLavfu%, AnvaAAd, or ~Ad to ~ vmAAdAty of t~ee =ore.nco es a ~hoAe, oz any otb: ~rc or provloLon ~r~f o~r ~n C~ ~ so (lCOIII OlN COY 4 Suffolk Countyt New York liete~ or of Iny polLt%cll fauz~le tmmnt v%th no~ ~o t~ ~rfo~e _~.~ v. Nm with or p~hibi~ ~t ih~ oufbl~ ~iq Io~ d l~lq. · -, ,. ,u remLo~ or t'.~if --~ tl~ ~ k~ th[ IIMOtoe to "~'i0 ............. m~ ~mque3, ~D ETa Itg~JmOl~m ttO SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: ~J~-~NT/DOP N~er of Pages: 4 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 01-04375 District: 1000 Deed Amount: Section: Block: 096.00 01.00 EXAMINED AND CHAROED AS FOLLOWS $0.00 Reoelved the Following Fees For Page/Filing $12.00 C0E $5.00 Notation $0.00 Re~ $15.00 T=ansfer tax $0.00 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 01-04375 THIS rAGE 28 Above Ins~maont Exemp~ NO Handling NO TP-584 NO Cart. Copies NO SCTM NO Co~.Pres A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT Recorded: At: LIBER: PAGE: Lot: Edward P.Romaine County Clerk, Suffolk County o8/3o/2oo~ 01:24:00 PM D00012139 075 o19.001 $5.00 No $0.oo NO $0.00 NO $0.00 NO $0.00 NO $37.00 N~mher of p~e~ TONREN$ Prior CIf, # Notation EA-52 I? (CounLv) Sub TOtM / 7 --' ~-s~ ~ 7 (s -~e) Comm. ot'~d. ~ C~__ ~ub 'Colal ~ OR^~O~ ','9/--~ Real Property 'lax Service A~n~t Vetifiealion ~1000 096.00 01.O0 gig,001 Reco~ing I Filing Slumps F, Iongngc Amt. 2, Additional Tax Sub Total TOT, M'I~. TAX If NO, s~ ~prialc t~x cl~s= on ~c ~ Conmmnit~ P~scrvation Fund Sat isl'aclions/Discharge~/R01eases List Prope~l RECORD & IRETURN TO: TD TI) Title CompnRy lnfornmtion Co. Name Tit]e # Suffolk ( & Endorsement lhispagclbm~sFartoflheal'~hed Easement V106723 ..__ made Arthur V. Jtmge (SPEC.~I'~tTYPI?,OlzINS'/RI~IT~I') O~-~,,;., ;;.,, ¥ozk ~1;37 Theptemhesheminissjt0aledln SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW In the'lbwr~ip of $outhold TO In the VILLAGE 501 l~or:h Ocean Avenue ,-. . . ~='~;,.,--,--,-,77. o,.,mm-,,f, c.,cho,., ,~ 13OXES ~. ,D'IRU 9 IvRJST BE TYPI~D OR PRII, IIED iN BLACK 1NK ONLY, H~dOR 10 RECORDING (mi. iLiNG {O¥~R) Your satis£acLion of mortgage has be~. filed In my office and I anl en¢l~.~jng Ibc original copy lbr your Ifa pnrlion ol'your monthly nlortgage payment lnch~ded your prop0rty taxtm. ~o. will now need C. op_lnc[ your local Towq T0X Recent so tl , n ~ n~ctl_v ~r all .Itu]ire propi-rCy Local prol~:rly iaxe.s ara pav, bh: ~,gl e a ),ear: o~1 or bi:fore JanusO- 10'" and on or lx, lb;:e May Failure to make payments In a tinlel¥ fashion could resuh ill a penalty. Plcaso contact your local Town Tax R~ceiv~r with any questions r~gardlng property tax payment. ,~nrth 1.1n¢lenh,ml. N.Y. 117~7 (¢31) O57 3004 250 Fast Main Street Porl ,Jl,.fl'ernol~. N.Y, 11777 {G3 l} 473-0236 300 Pa n/1.qc~ East Hsalapt0n. N.Y. 11937 (6511 324-2770 I$1ip Town Receiver of 'l'~xc~ 40 Nas,san Avenue Ialip, N,Y. 117§1 [631) 2')4 5580 200 ['I~JWpII Aq'nnllCt Rlverhead, N.I: 11901 (6!t1 } 727.3200 ~hcltcr Islatld Town Receiver of Taxes Shelter Island Town I.lall 5hei/cr Island, N.Y. 11964 (631) 7~m3338 99 West Main .~/rcet ,~mlfll lmm;I, N,Y, 117~7 l'~ Il 3i$0 7~10 ll.~mpton Road 283-6514 Sm'ti'hold Town I/ccelveg of Tnxe,~ 53095 Main Street .~otdhold, N'.Y. 1'1971 (831) 7~5 180,3 2/99 ShlOOt'llJ.,~, Suflblk Cmmty Clcrk Archur ¥. ~n~e ] MAP OF; ZI$5~ C,~.,~y t~.A 4,~ IO00-Oq6-1)O-ObOO-O~fl-bb~ LOCALLY: ~u~o~o~ T~N OF: ~o~o~ COUN~ OF: SUFF~ · STATE OF:NEW YO~ KEY PROPOSED EXHIBIT A NO. OCEAN AV~ COMMON DRIVEWAY DECLARATION New Yor~ hereinulter referred M collectively u the "Declarants'. WITNESSFFH: WHEREAS, Dcclarants are ~he owners of lands in Ihe Town of Southold situate along the flo~erly side of Raute 48, Cutchoguo mid hnds be~ bounded end described in Schedule A (~oseph ScboeMtein), nnd B (Althur Junge), sam schedules beJ~ nfln~ed berne and nmde a pm hereo~ WHEREAS, Declarams hve ngreed to create · common drivewuy for the purpose of in~ress and ngre~s to the above~/escrihed parcels of the lend and ~r the installation ofuUIJfies end ell other lawful purposes in ~uyor of these parcels, so thal whern will be a common access to serve both pan:ds; ~cl WHERKAS, Declarants de, sim lo provide for such ~a~ed driveway ~__ _,~c~_~ to and ~rom Drive; NOW, TllEREFORE. he it decbtred as follows: i. The lots das~rihed above shall b. vea common driveway aeces~ to ~nd from Route 48 over that portion ofland described in Schedule C, said schedule being annexed hereto and made a part hereof. Such driveway sludl replace any existing driveways, now.ex|sting on the Mohr property described in Schedule A annexed hereto. ~ new driveway shall bo located upon the Junge property along the property line contisuous to the Mohr property. 2. The use of the premises described in Schedule C shall be subject to the following restrictions: a. The lot owne,~s shell have the joint, equal, end mutua] right to use the priv-qe roadway described in Schedule C for the purpose of in, teas and egr~s and placement of utilities. b. The ten-ns "lot owner" or "lot owners" ~', used in this Declaration, shall be deemed to include any helr~ distributans, ~--.sors' or a~sns ofthe panicolar lot owner or lot owner~. PaBe 1 of 4 lot ovmm' and bis/her heirs, distn'bulens, ~uccessors, and usigns, all ot'th~ conditions, obligations, reslrictions, and prov~sion~ et'this Decleration. d. The word "nmintananca", es used in Ibis Der. lamtlmN shall be deemed to mean all costs and expmtses in connection with mid privme roedw~y, including the costs ot'sweepin~ resurl~ng, resmvallin& tU]ins in oFholes, and .11 those items necassmy to make it convenient and safe for the owners of'the aforesaid lots to use the private roadway described in Schedule C. e. After thc initial installation ofthe driveway at the sole cost of Junge, or his successor shall determine what maintenance or improvements shall he dona on the road and thc amount of money to be expended ther~or. The owners o~'the lots shell be re, on,bin for equal pordons ot maintecance. £ All lot owners alFec thet the roadway shall alvmys be maintained so as to he passable by vehicles: both automobiles and tracks and this droll include prompt repair it'any "potholes" or similar det'e~s in the road which cause the re~dw&y to become s~bstanderd. g. In the ~vent either lot owner Fail to pay their proponionnte share o£maiotananca expcnse wkldn seven (7) days of'notification of'charges, such unpaid monies may be collected fi'om the other lot owner. In this event, the lot owner having duly paid both thor proporfionatn shares ol'expem~es and those el'the de~aultin$ lot owner shall be deemed the contractor es defined in the New York Uan Law. The lot own~ who hu not pa~d his/l~r proportionate share shall subject his/bm real property to the lines or the lot ovmer who has pa~d his/her sham of' maintenance expense, The lot owner who hu pa~d their proportionate share ot'expansex may also commence an a~ion n~ptinst the de~'auldng lot ownar, in a court ofippropriatejurisdiction, in order to recover the unpaid monies. In any action commenced against a det'aultin8 lot owner, the~e shall be a presumption that the malntenanc, e work fi3r which monins are owing was validly authorized by the other lot owner and vms competently performed by the contraclor who did the work. A de~ultlng lot owner shall be liable ~or all costs and expenses, including but nol limited to attorney's tees which are incurred by the other lot owner in recovering the de~suhin$ lot owner's unpaid share ofexpan~es. h. Notwithstanding anything to the comrsry herein, each and eve,~y lot owner shall repair at his/~r sol· cost and expanse any dnma~n done to the roedw~y by constrection t~a~c, machinery, or other implements used in the construction of improvements on the particular lot owneds land. Any failure to make or pay for such repair may be treated by the other lot owner as a default in the payment ot'm~ntcnanca expense, in accordance w~th subparagraph (8) ebove. 3. it is Further asreed that a. the driveway shall be installed It the sole cost mul expanse o£Junge or his suecer, sor in the interest itl the property, Paso2 o~4 b. tho width of'tho driveway shall remain 12 ~eet and shall not be widened without the written consent of Junse or his successor. c. the driveway shall be in conformance with all rcq0iremonts of.tbe Town of Southoid but not be paved or othe~vise improved with any t~pe of'impervious suneace; d. tim Iooation of'the driveway shall not bo c, hansed without the consent of'both parties or their respective successors. 4. This declaration is binding upon all grantees, heirs, distfibutees, successors, or assigns of any portion otlands desto'bed in S~edulo A mi B abov~ 5. This Common Driveway Dechretion may not be revoked, rescinded, antingnished, modified or amended without the express v~itten Immi~don ora majority plus o~ oftbe Southold Town Planning Bored or it~ logan succcssur, except that the provisions hareot'which relate mleiy to the mckin~ or. repair or impmvcment decisions or the eilocatioa ofoxpemes among lot owners may bo revoked or modified without such Board's approval. 6. Mohr makes no cJalm to have, st any time, any right, title, or interest iA any part of the lends orJungn os sci ~orth in Schedule A other than to the drivevflty created by this agreement in tho area defined in Schedule C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, tho I)ecisrants have hereunto set their hands and se~s as or'the day and year first above writton. A~hur Jun~e ~ ~ ' Chris Mohr STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ) nora thcr~..~ay or~. in thc year 2003 before me, tho undersigned personally ppea hor Junse, person~, known to me or proved to mo on tho basis of,sctisf.actoty evidence to be the individual(s) whose namc(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instmmant and acknowledged to mc that he/abe/they executed tim same in his/her/their capochy(ies), and that by Page 3 of 4 hss/her/thmr signature(s) on the instrument, the the i~i~dud(s) a~, ~t~ ~e in~t. Vemn~ F. C~o~ No~ ~Mo, S~ ~ N~ Y~ No: ~661~ Qu~ in 8~k ~u~ Commi~n ~ D~.31.~ or tho p~rson upon behalf of which ol~ry Public STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Onthe. J..~,dayo~ inlheymr2003 betbr=mr~ the und~rsi, ffjtod per~onal]y me t~I~U~S) ~OSO ~SJ I[ ~a~) mb~ to t~ ~thin J~m~l and a~wi~g~ to mo thru h~s~th~ m~t~ the ~o in ~/~ir ~p~ies), and th~ by h~ ~a~s) on t~ in~m~nt, ~o i~t~du~s), or the ~n u~n b~nlFoFwhi~ the indi~d~l(s) ~, ~1~ the in~m~t. N~ ~b~o, S~te ~ ~ Y~ No: 5~1~6 , . Q~lfi~ In S~olk ~_~ ~ Pubhc ~mm~ion ~pires Dec,31,~ Page 4 of 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net Exarained ,20.__ Approved 20 Disapproved a/o pD~A.~ Z{ (I~0 Expiration ,20__ PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Do you have or need the following, before applying7 Board of Health 4 sets of Building Plan~ Planning Board approval Survey Cheek Septic Form N.Y.$.D.E.C. Truste~ Flood Permit Storm-Water Assessment Form Cantaet: Attorneys for Applicant. Mail to:Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 31~uNQrth New York Avenue ntmeton. NY 11743 Phone: 631-4254100 , sets oJ _ ~ ~~ Building Inspector l ~F.~~~,, ~ ~ICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT ' app~0~'~l~e completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with4 This I1o. r, ~-- · ,.,,,,'¥"h'plot plan to scale Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work'covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall bo kept on thc premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall bo occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Oecupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if tho work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after tho date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing} the extension of the permit for an addition ~ix months. Thoreattor, a now permit shall bo required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of $outhold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. Tho applicant agrees to comply with all applicable lam, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. MetroPCS New York, LLC (Signature of applicant or name, ifa ~ Limited Liabihty Company 5 Skyline Drive,.HawthoI31e, NY 10532 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Lessee Name of owner of premises Arthur, V. Junge .~-~-'TN,. ~ '~/Com any (As on the tax roll or latest deed) P . If 3ppl,[ggla.t.is ~ ~J~m ~l~Ymg~u~e fif*duly authorized officer By: . ~ ..,t~ I/ ' I (Name an~d/ti~l.~ Builders License No. Plumbers License No'. N/A Electricians Licefise No. Other Tmde's License No. N/A 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 21855 CounW Road 48, Cutehogue, New Ym'k House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 96 Block 1 Subdivision Filed Map No. 2. State existing us~ and occgpancy.ofpremises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing tree and oqeupancy Commercial and public util ty wireless telecmnmunications facility b. Intended &se and occupancy Same as existing 9. 10 Date 0fPurchase 4/6/1987 Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building. Addition · Alteration Repair Removal . Demolition Other Work Affix public utility wireless telecommunications antqnna.~ io.~ro¢ose¢ 12:~ extemiion on.qxisting,100' monopole and install related (Doserintion~ equipment on the grounu as uepllXexa in the'-plans suomltteanerewnn. E~timated Cost $10o.oo0.00 Fee ~ __ · ' ' (To be paid on filing this application) If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number .of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars Commercial and public if business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type o~use.~e~eeommunzeat~ons ~aellity Dimensions of. existing structures, if any? Front Rear Depth Height, 'Number'of Stories ' * Existing I00' monopole Dimenmons of same structure with alterah ns or additions~ Front i ,~' i ~i ii/i Depfh Height · Numbe'r, o?StOries.-* ~ k~ mon0pol~ { /Proposed equipment within 18'x20' c~mip6Up~ . Dimensions of entire ne~V constmction.:Fmnt . · Rear i ~-; i ~.~-., Depth~ Height Number of Stories ~ / 45,589 square feet ....... . Size of lotfFront~ Rear Depth . r ~., 1' .Namo of Former Owner Timothy Scott Gray ......... 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated Light Industrial District 12. Does proposed construction violate any zomng law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO x 13. Will lot be re-graded? YE8 NO ,,~ Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES 'X NO . 418 M/)ulton Hill Rd. 14. Names of Owner.of premises Arthur V. Junge Address Lyman, NH 03585 Phone No. 603-838-8982 Name of Architect MTM Design Group Inc. . Address PO Box 3,Hazlet. NJ 07730phone No 732-888-621,0 Name of Contractor Address ' ' PhoneNo. 15 a. Is this prope~ withi~a 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshWater wetland? *YES NO x * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E,C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this proPerty·within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES ' NO X ' * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with acourato foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at I0 feet ~r below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and res,tricfions w~th respect to thts property? * YES. X NO * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) / . SS: COUNTY OF ~'r~ 0 j ~ ~/~' , being dtlly sworn, deposes and says tbat (s)he is tile applicant (Name ofindiv!duai signing contract) above named, . (S)He is the Lessee/Applictmt (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statdments contained in this application are true to the best'of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Swgrn ~o, before me thi~ (,, ~ day of, J(,,~ q-~ r? N01/II~ PUBIJC, 8~t~ of New Yo~t Il). 01LA~027870 M~'~N e w~yC -- Sign~tur'e of ~pplicant TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location SitePianName:MetroPC5 at 21855 ¢.R. 48, Cutchogue Application Date: 7 Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 96 - I - 19.1 Other SCTM #s: /2 f2010 Street Address: 21855 County Road 48 Hamlet: CuthhoKue Distance to nearest intersection: West of Cox Lane Type of Site Plan: New X Amended __ Residential If Amended, last approval date: __/ SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number for the people below: Property Owner Arthur V. Junge S~em 418 Moulton Hill Rd. City Lyman Home Telephone Smte NH .Zip 03585 Other 603-838-8982 Applicant SWeet MetroPCS New York, LLC 5 Skyline Drive City_ Hawthorne Home Telephone State w/ Zip 10532 Other 914-593-8500 Applicant's Agent or Representative: ContactPerson(s)* R.e, Nielsen~, Huber & C..o,ughlin, LLP Street 36 North New York Avenue City. Huntington State I~/ .Zip 11743 Office Telephone 631-425-4100 Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 SEfTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: New X Property total acreage or square footage: Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: Modification of Existing Structure Change of use 45 ~ 589 a~./sq, ft. 360 ~tsq, ft, Agricultural lis there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ If yes, explain: No Property Zoning District(s): Light Industrial I Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 4_ _~ 21 _( 10 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required9 Yes __ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes __ No __ If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No X Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing propertyuses: Auto Repair and Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility List all proposed property uses: Same as above Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: 45.16 % Proposed lot coverage:. 45.95 % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): .sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s):. Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: # of proposed spaces: No ChangeLoading Berth: Yes__ No X Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 52 % Proposed landscape coverag~O Chan§e% Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500' ora wetland area? Yes __ No X If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify th?afall~t/hC~ve information is true. MetffoPC/~I~v~j~ York, LLC Signature of Preparer: By ~..~/~ _~.,.~ Date: Page 3 of 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD WIRELESS FACILITY SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION Application Name (use same name as Site Plan Application MetroPCS at 21855 C.R. 48, Cutchogue JUL - 2 2010 Application Date: Jul,y / 2 /20 10 Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000 - 96 1 19.1 Other SCTM#'s: Street Address: 21855 County Road 48 Hamlet: Cutchogue Checklist of application materials required to be submitted (see Special Exception Application Requirements Handout or §280-74 D. of the Southold Town Code for details) X One copy of the building permit application materials Complete site plan application submission One copy of the deed or lease agreement for the use of the property Analysis of site location alternatives Effort to co-locate documentation (if this is not a co-location) Propagation maps showing existing facilities and service in the town Evidence supporting existence of inadequate service × Special Exception Application Fee form updated 5/4/2009 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC For Approval to collocate public utility wireless telecommunications antennas on a proposed 12' extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York District 1000 Section 96, Block i, Lot 19.1 COLOCATION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) Richard Mohr, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1~1,33~) 1. I am the Site Acquisition Manager for g./~Ix/ Yerk for MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS") and am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances hereinafter set forth. 2. The business address of MetroPCS is 5 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, New York 10532. 3. I make this affidavit pursuant to Town of Southold Code Section 280-74D(2). 4. Upon information and belief, the subject monopole will be capable of accommodating colocation of additional antennas for future users. Sworn to before me thisd'~ ' ;'-- "~' day of /)l~c Lv ,2010. NOTARY PUBLIC METROPCS NEW YORK, LLC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC For Approval to collocate public utility wireless telecommunications antennas on a proposed 12' extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York District 1000 Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) AFFIDAVIT OF GOOD FAITH EFFORT AND SITE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED PURSUANT TO TOWN CODE SECTIONS 280- 74D(1)(c) and 280- 74D(2) NICHOLAS BALZANO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer for MetroPCS New York, LLC (hereinafter "MetroPCS"). As a radio frequency engineer, 1 am trained to identify service deficiencies in MetroPCS wireless telecommunications network and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy these service deficiencies. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. I am fully familiar with MetroPCS's wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of MetroPCS's application for approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. Pursuant to this application, MetroPCS requests approval to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to a proposed 12' extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment on the ground as depicted in the plans submitted herewith. 2010 3. In keeping with the purpose and intent of Chapter 280 of the Code of the Town of Southold, MetroPCS seeks to locate its facility on an existing building or structure located within an area of Southold, in which there is a significant service gap. 4. MetroPCS looked for and secured a lease for co-location on this existing monopole, pursuant to Southold Code Sections 280-74D(1 )(c) and 280-74D(2). 5. I ascertained that the installation of public utility wireless telecommunications antennas within a twelve-foot extension on the existing monopole at the Premises would serve to eliminate the coverage gap in the area. 6. I also determined that none of the existing buildings or structures lying in the subject search area, including the next available height on the existing monopole, would be suitable for a facility that would be capable of eliminating the coverage gap in the area because each fails to meet the minimum height requirement. 7. The only alternative to the instant proposal would be the construction of a new structure, such as a monopole. Sworn to before me this /7 ~ day of May, 2010. NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New No. 01LA6027870 Qualified in Westchester County N~CH, ;LAS B,~LZANO 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC For Approval to collocate public utility wireless telecommunications antennas on a proposed 12' extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York District 1000 Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) AFFIDAVIT OF RADIO FREQUENCY ENGINEER NICHOLAS BALZANO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer for MetroPCS New York, LLC (hereinafter "MetroPCS"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in MetroPCS wireless telecommunications network and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy these service deficiencies. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. I am fully familiar with MetroPCS's wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of MetroPCS's application for approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. Pursuant to this application, MetroPCS requests approval to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to a proposed 12' extension on an existing monopole and install related equipment on the ground as depicted in the plans submitted herewith. 3. MetroPCS is considered a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of New York and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to serve the public within Suffolk County and throughout much of the United States. MetroPCS strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage area. 4. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wimless telecommunications network throughout Suffolk County. The proposed facility will allow MetroPCS to provide reliable coverage in the vicinity of the proposed site. Unreliable service can represent an inconvenience to users of MetroPCS's services and can have serious consequences during times of emergency or disaster. 5. In order to understand why the proposed antenna site is needed, it is necessary to understand how MetroPCS's system works from an engineering standpoint. MetroPCS's wireless telecommunications system is designed so that low powered base stations are strategically located at determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. Due to such factors as hills, valleys, trees, buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves, each coverage area or "cell" is irregularly shaped. With sufficient signal strength from each base station, the MetroPCS user can reliably transmit, receive or maintain voice or data connections. The sites are ordinarily engineered to cover a limited area so that an antenna facility will cover only the area surrounding it but will not interfere with other sites in the system. 6. MetroPCS has established design criteria so that its wireless network will provide reliable wireless service to its customers, whether those customers are on the street, in a vehicle, or in a building. Providing reliable service to MetroPCS's customers within vehicles and buildings is critical for MetroPCS to provide the quality of wireless service that customers demand and successfully compete with other wireless providers. 7. To meet customer demands and expectations, MetroPCS strives to provide In-Vehicle (or In-Car) coverage and In-Building coverage. These coverage levels represent the minimum signal strength and reliability of service needed to transmit, receive or maintain a voice or data connection at the mobile handset as the environment changes. 8. To provide these levels of coverage, MetroPCS has scientifically determined the strength of the wireless signal ("signal strength") necessary to provide these levels of coverage. Because wireless signals are attenuated (i.e. degraded or partially blocked) by obstructions such as trees, automobile windows, automobile sheet metal, and building materials such as wood, brick and metal, a wireless signal 2 must be of sufficient strength in the ambient environment (i.e. outside with no obstructions) to reliably penetrate into automobiles and buildings. 9. Wireless signal strength is measured on a logarithmic power scale referenced to 1 milli- watt of power. Signal strength levels less than 1 milli-watt being negative. The smaller the negative dBm number, the stronger the signal. For example, -75dBm is a stronger signal level than -85dBm. An ambient signal level of -95dBm would provide reliable In-Vehicle coverage on MetroPCS's system. MetroPCS's system requires an ambient signal level of -85dBm to provide reliable In-Building Residential coverage, and an ambient signal level of -75dBm to provide reliable In-Building Commercial coverage. These signal level requirements provide the basis for MetroPCS's design criteria. 10. MetroPCS's design criteria for wireless facilities serving an area are based upon providing 95% reliable signal over a site's coverage area to ensure reliable service for customers. This standard reflects a business judgment that 100% reliability is an unrealistic goal at this time due to financial, technical and environmental constraints. A 95% level of reliability is consistent with the level of service provided by MetroPCS's competitors and is the standard in the industry. Providing service at this level allows MetroPCS to satisfy customers' demands and compete on an equal footing with competitors serving the market. 11. To achieve the 95% reliable design goal, MetroPCS conducts extensive analysis based upon MetroPCS's technology and the area served. 12. In order to eliminate the service deficiency in a particular area, MetroPCS performs signal propagation studies to determine the height and location of the needed cell site. Based on its studies, MetroPCS determined that an antenna facility would have to be established within a narrowly defined search area in order to remedy the service gap in question. In this case, we determined that the installation of the proposed facility will allow MetroPCS to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 13. The proposed antennas must be affixed at least as high as those depicted on the plans submitted herewith in order to ensure that reliable service can be afforded to MetroPCS users in the vicin/ty of the site. The location and height of the antennas is determined by some or all of the following factors: availability of existing structures, willingness of property owners to enter into leases, drive test data, location of existing antenna sites in the area, topography in the surrounding area, land cover features in the area such as buildings and foliage, and the results provided by computer propagation software that enables radio frequency engineers to predict the anticipated signal propagation at a given height and location. 14. In order to illustrate the effect that the proposed site would have on coverage in its vicinity, propagation maps have been prepared demonstrating the different coverage levels summarized above. The maps depict the area to be served by the proposed site. As the maps indicate, the proposed facility is of vital importance to MetroPCS's efforts to provide reliable service to the area in question. Unless this application is granted, MetroPCS will be unable to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 15. The antennas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service or public safety telecommunications in the surrounding area. Sworn to before me this NOTARY PUBLIC ,2010. NOTARy PUBLIC, State of Ne~ ¥o~¢ No. 01LA6027870 ~E~mallf~ed in Westches~er County ralston F-.xplres ju~/19, 20- / ~ 4 DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING · PO BOX 3 · HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 · TEL: 732 888 6210 · FAX: 732 8474335 · June 23,2010 Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Planning Board Reference: Metro PCS Application 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Section: 96, Block: 1, Lot: 19.1, Zone: LI Metro PCS Project#: NY7314, MTM#: 09MPSTS014 To Whom It May Concern: With reference to the above noted site regarding the drainage and grading at the existing telecommunication facility on the property, please note the following. The existing native soil in the area of the proposed equipment is pervious and comprised of sand and gravel and would not pose any drainage problems. The proposed equipment will be mounted on a new 13' x 16' (208 Square Feet) concrete slab adjacent to the existing fenced equipment compound. The concrete slab will allow for any potential precipitation to pass to the existing pervious surface. The impact of the 208 SF of impervious surface created with the proposed concrete slab in comparison to the overall size of the existing property and the existing grading and drainage will be negligible. As depicted on the construction documents submitted concurrently, the proposed equipment areas are to be mildly re-graded such that it is relatively level with the adjacent existing surrounding areas. No retaining walls or radical changes in surface features or runoff are proposed. If you shiny question~ File ;, or need any additional information, please feel free to contact our /~ao- ?~-/-i?,/TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET ~ / TS.~ VILLAGE ~)IST, SUB. LOT FORMER OWNER ~ N E ACH. ] .:'. ~¢~'~ ~ - S W ~ ~PE OF BUILDING RE ,, S~S. FA~ COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value FAR~ - ,ADe Volu~ Per ~u~ ' j Brushla~ FRONTAGE ON ROAD House Plot DEPTH ~ .96.-1-19.1 1/06 .B. Foundation /Dj¢. ~..~ Bath 3 Dinette Basement Floors K. Walls Fire Place Roof reation Room Dormer Driveway Interior Finish Heat Rooms 1st Floor Rooms 2nd Floor LR. DR. BR. FIN. B. M. Bldg. Extensj 96.-1-19.1 out buildings 1/06 Walls I Interior Finish COLOR TRIM COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ("Lease Agreement") dated as of , is made by and between MetroPCS NeTM York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Lessee") and Arthur V. Junge, an individual ("Lessor"). RECITALS This Lease Agreement is entered into based upon the following facts, circumstances and understandings: A. Lessor owns certain real property legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and commonly known as 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Assessor's Pamel Number Section 096, Block 0001, Lot 019.001 ("Lessor's Real Property"). Lessee desires to lease a portion of Lessor's Real Property with any necessary easements over other portions of Lessor's Real Property and/or shared use of Lessor's easements over other real property necessary for Lessee's access and utilities to the leased area (altogether the "Premises"), as described on Exhibit "B' attached hereto. Lessor represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the rights set forth herein and that it has full rights of ingress to and egress from the Premises from a poblic roadway. B. Lessee desires to construct and operate a wireless communications site at the Premises. C. Based on the premises set forth herein and on the terms and conditions set forth below, Lessor is willing to lease the Premises to Lessee for Lessee's proposed use subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement. WHEREFORE, in consideration of tile Premises set forth above and the terms and conditioas set forth herein, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereto agree as follows: 1. Grant of Lease. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee the Premises for Lessee's proposed use, subject to the following terms and conditions ~br the Term. 2. Permitted Uses. The Premises may be used by Lessee for the operation of a wireless communications site. Under this Lease Agreement, Lessee may iostall, place, use and operate on the Premises such antennas, radio transmitting and receiving equipment, conduits, wires, batteries, back-up generators, utility lines and facilities, supporting structures, storage facilities, telephone facilities, microwave equipment, and related equipment (collectively "Lessee's Facilities") as Lessee deems oecessary for the operation of its wireless communications site at the Premises. Further, Lessee may perform construction, maintenance, repaim, additions to, and replacement of Lessee's Facilities as necessary and appropriate for its ongoing business and has the right to do all work necessary to prepare, modify and maintain the Premises to accommodate Lessee's Facilities and as required for Lessee's communications operations at the Premises. Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County ll.d 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page I of 15 3. Conditinns Precedent: Prior Approvals. This Lease Agreement is conditioned upon Lessee obtaining all governmental licenses, permits and approvals enabling Lessee to construct and operate wireless communications facilities on the Premises without conditions which are not standard o'r typical for premises where wireless communications facilities are located. Lessor agrees to cooperate with Lessoe's reasonable requests for Lessor's signatures as real property owner on permit applications, for allowing site inspections by governmental agencies required in connection with reviewing permit applications, and for assistance in obtaining such necessary approvals, provided that such cooperation and assistance shall be at no expense to Lessor. 4. Term. The term of this Lease Agreement ("Term") shall be five (5) years commencing on the date LesSee begins construction of Lessee's Facilities on the Premises or eighteen (18) months from the date of full execution of this Lease Agreement, whichever occurs first ("Commencement Date"). Lessee shall promptly deliver written notice to Lessor of the Commencement Date. Lessee shall have the right to extend the Term of fl~is Lease Agreement for four (4) additional terms (each a "Renewal Term") of five (5) years each. The terms and conditions for each Renewal Term shall be the same terms and conditions as in this Lease Agreement, except that the Rent shall be increased as set forth hareinbelow. This Lease Agreement shall automatically be extended for each successive five (5) year Renewal Term unless Lessee notifies Lessor in writing of Lessee's intention not to extend this Lease Agreement at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the first Term or any Renewal Term. 5. Rent. (a) Within forty-five_(45~ days ~f the Commencement Date, Lessee shall pay Lessor, as rent, the sum of-- -- ("Rent") per month. Rent shall be payable on the first day of each m~h, in advance, t~ Lessor-or ~essor's alternate payee specified in Section 22, Notices and Deliveries. If the Commencement Date of this Lease Agreement is other than the first day of a calendar month, Lessee may pay on the first day of the Term the prorated Rent for the remainder of the calendar month in which the Term commences, and thereafter Lessee shall pay a full month's Rent on the first day of each calendar month, except that payment shall be prorated for the final fractional month of this Lease Agreement, or if this Lease Agreement is terminated before the expiration of any month for which Rent should have been paid. Rent shall be increased on each anniversary of the Commencement Date by an amount of~llllllll~of the Rent for the then previous year. (b) Lessee hereby assigns all rights to receive Rent under this Agreement to Arthur V Junge Inc., a New Hampshire Corporation (the "Assignment"). In the event Lessor revokes the Assignment, Lessor shall immediately notify Lessee pursuant to Paragraph 22 hereunder. Lessor waives all rights of recovery and releases Lessee from any and all claims arising from the Assignment. 6. Duc Dilieence Contim,encv and Pre-Commencement Date Access to Premises. Lessee shall have the right (but not the obligation) at any time following the full execution of this Lease Agreement and prior to the Commencement Date, to enter the Premises for the purpose of making necessary inspections, taking measurements and conducting engineering surveys (and soil tests where applicable) and other reasonably necessary tests to determine the suitability of the Premises for Lessee's Facilities ("Due Diligence"), and for the purpose of preparing the Premises for the installation or construction of Lessee's Facilities. During any Due Diligence activities or pre-construction work, Lessee shall have insurance which covers such activities as set forth in Section 16, Insurance. Lessee will notify Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY l 1935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 2 of 15 Lessor of any proposed tests, measurements or pre-construction work and will coordinate the scheduling of such activities with Lessor. If in the course of its Due Diligence Lessee detarmines that the Premises are unsuitable for Lessee's contemplated use, then Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease Agreement prior to the Commencement Date by delivery of written notice thereof to Lessor as set forth in Section 13, Termination. 7. On~oiw, Access to Premises. Throughout tho Term and any Renewal Term of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall have the right of access without escort to the Premises for its employees and agents twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days per week, at no additional charge to Lessee. In exercising its right of access to the Premises herein, Lessee agrees to cooperate with any reasonable security procedures utilized by Lessor at Lessor's Real Property and further agrees not to unduly disturb or interfere with the business or other activities of Lessor or of other tenants or occupants of Lessor's Real Property. Lessor shall maintain all existing access roadways or driveways extending from the nearest public roadway to the Premises in a manner sufficient to allow for Lessee's access to the Premises. Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing such roadways and driveways at Lessor's sole expense, except for any damage caused by Lessee's use of such roadways or driveways. If Lessee causes any such damage, Lessee shall promptly repair the same at its sole expense. Except those constructed by Lessee, Lessor, not Lessee, shall be responsible for the maintenance and compliance with laws of all towers and structures located on the Premises, including compliance with Part 17 of the Federal Communications Commissions' Rules. 8. Lessee's Work~ Maintenance and Repairs. All of Lessee's construction and installation work at the Premises shall be performed at Lessce's sole cost and expense and in a good and workmanlike mannar. Lessee shall submit copies of the site plan and specifications to the Lessor for prior approval, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Lessor shall give such approval or provide Lessee with its requests for changes within five (5) business days of Lessor's receipt of Lessee's plans. If Lessor does not provide such approval or request for changes within such five (5) business day period, Lessor shall be deemed to have approved the plans. Lessor shall not be entitled to receive any additional consideration in exchange for giving its approval of Lessee's plans. Lessee shall maintain Lessee's Facilities and the Premises in neat and safe condition in compliance with all applicable codes and governmental regulations. Lessee shall not be required to make any repairs to the Premises except for damages to the Premises caused by Lessee, its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. Upon the expiration, cancellation or termination of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall surrender the Premises in good condition, less ordinary wear and tear; however, Lessee shall not be required to remove any foundation supports for Lessee's Facilities or conduits which have been installed by Lessee. 9. Title to Lessee's Facilities. Title to Lessee's Facilities and any equipment placed on the Premises by Lessee shall be held by Lessee. All of Lessee's Facilities shall remain the property of Lessee and are not fixtures. Lessee has the right to remove all Lessee's Facilities at its sole expense on or before the expiration or termination of this Lease Agreement. Lessor acknowledges that Lessee may enter into financing arrangements including promissory notes and financial and security agreements for the financing of Lessee's Facilities (the "Collateral") with a third party financing entity and may in the future enter into additional financing arrangements with other financing entities. In connection therewith, Lessor (i) consents to the installation of the Collateral to the extent that the Collateral is part of the approved Lessee's Facilities; (ii) disclaims any interest in the Collateral, as fixtures or otherwise, whether arising at law or otherwise, including, but not limited to any statutory landlord's lien; and (iii) agrees that the Collateral shall be exempt from execution, foreclosure, sale, levy, attachment, or distress for any Rent Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 3 of 15 due or to become due and that such Collateral may be removed at any time without recourse to legal proceedings. 10. Utilities. Lessee shall have the right to install utilities, at Lessee's expense, and to improve the present utilities on or near the Premises (including, but not limited to the installation of emergency back-up power). Subject to Lessor's approval of the location, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, Lessee shall have the right to place utilities on (or to bring utilities across) Lessor's Real Property in order to service the Premises and Lessee's Facilities. Upon Lessee's request, Lessor shall execute reeordable easement(s) evidencing this right. Lessee shall fully and promptly pay for all utilities furnished to the Premises for the use, operation and maintenance of Lessee's Facilities. Upon Lessee's request, Lessor shall allow Lessee to install sub-metering equipment on existing Lessor utility service(s). Lessee agrees to install, at Lessee's cost, the required equipment, meters and connections and will reimburse Lessor for Lessee's use of utilities at a rate equal to Lessor's unit cost for the utilities. Lessee shall pay the cost of utility service provided to the Promises and attributable to Lessee's use ("Utility Charge"). Lessee shall pay the estimated cost of the Utility Charge monthly in advance. The parties estimate the Utility Charge at the commencement of construction to be During the term of this Lease Agreement, at Lessor's request (' frequent than once every twelve months), Lessee shall calculate the actual Utility Charge for the immediately preceding twelve (12) months based on the readings from the privately installed sub-meter at Lessor's property. If the actual Utility Charge varies from the estimated Utility Charges paid, the parties shall reconcile past payments of utility charges and adjust future estimates of the Utility Charge to reflect Lessee's actual usage. 11. Interference with Communications. Lessee's Facilities and operations shall not interfere with the communications configurations, frequencies or operating equipment which exist on Lessor's Real Property on the effective date of this Lease Agreement ("Pre-existing Communications"), and Lessee's Facilities and operations shall comply with all non-interference rules of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"). Upon written notice from Lessor of apparent interference by Lessee with Pre-existing Communications, Lessee shall have the responsibility to promptly terminate such interference or demonstrate to Lessor with competent information that the apparent interference in fact is not caused by Lessee's Facilities or operations. Lessor shall not, nor shall Lessor permit any other tenant or occupant of any portion of Lessor's Real Property to, engage in any activities or operations which interfere with the communications operations of Lessee described in Section 2, above. Such interference with Lessee's communications operations shall be deemed a material breach by Lessor, and Lessor shall have the responsibility to promptly terminate said interference. In the event any such interference does not cease promptly, the parties acknowledge that continuing interference will cause irreparable injury to Lessee, and therefore Lessee shall have the right to bring a court action to enjoin such interference or to terminate this Lease Agreement immediately upon notice to Lessor. Lessor agrees to incorporate equivalent provisions regarding non-interference with Pre-existing Communications into any subsequent leases, licenses or rental agreements with other persons or entities for any portions of Lessor's Real Property. 12. Taxes. Lessee shall pay personal property taxes assessed against Lessee's Facilities, and Lessor shall pay when due all real property taxes and all other taxes, fees and assessments attributable to the Premises and this Lease Agreement. 13. Termination. This Lease Agreement may be terminated by Lessee effective immediately without further liability by delivery of written notice thereof to Lessor prior to the Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, CutChogue. NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 4 of 15 Commencement Date for any reason resulting from Lessee's Due Diligence, or if a title report obtained by Lessee for Lessor's Real Property shows any defects of title or any liens or encumbrances which may adversely affect Lessee's use of the Premises for Lessee's intended use, or for any other or no reason. This Lease may be terminated without further liability on thirty (30) days prior written notice as follows: (i) by either party upon a default of any covenant, condition, or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured within sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice of default; (ii) by Lessee if it does not obtain licenses, permits or other approvals necessary to the construction or operation of Lessee's Facilities ("Permits"), is unable to obtain such Permits without conditions which are not standard or typical for premises where wireless communications facilities are located or is unable to maintain such licenses, permits or approvals despite reasonable efforts to do so', (iii) by Lessee if Lessee is unable to occupy or utilize the Premises due to ruling or directive of the FCC or other governmental or regulatory agency, including, but not limited to, a take back of frequencies; or (iv) by Lessee if Lessee determines that the Premises are not appropriate for its operations for economic, environmental or technological reasons, including, without limitation, signal strength or interference. Other than as stated herein, Lessor shall not have the right to terminate, revoke or cancel this Lease Agreement. 14. Destruction of Premises. If the Premises or Lessor's Property is destroyed or damaged so as in Lessee's judgment to hinder its effective use of Lessor's Property for the ongoing operation of a wireless communications site, Lessee may elect to terminate this Lease Agreement without further liability of Lessee as of the date of the datnage or destruction by so notifying Lessor no mom than thirty (30) days following the date of damage or destruction. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties which do not survive the termination of this Lease Agreement shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction. 15. Condemnation. If a condemning authority takes ail of Lessor's Real Property, or a portion which in Lessee's reasonable opinion is sufficient to render the Premises unsuitable for Lessee's ongoing operation of a wireless communications site, then this Lease Agreement shall terminate without further liability of Lessee as of the date when possession is delivered to the condemning authority. In any condemnation proceeding each party shall be entitled to make a claim against the condemning authority for just compensation recoverable under applicable condemnation law. Sale of all or part of the Premises to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of its power of eminent domain shall be treated as a taking by a condemning authority. 16. Insurance. Lessee shall maintain the following insurance: (1) Commercial General Liability with limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, (2) Automobile Liability with a combined single limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per accident, (3) Workers Compensation as required by law, and (4) Employer's Liability with limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence. Lessor, at Lessor's sole cost and expense, shall procure and maintain on the Property, bodily injury and property damage insurance with a combined single limit of at least One Million Dollam ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence. Such insurance shall insure, on an occurrence basis, against liability of Lessor, its employees and agents arising out of or in connection with Lessor's use, occupancy and maintenance of the Property. Each party shall be named as an additional insured on the other's policy. Each party shall provide to the other a certificate of insurance evidencing the coverage required by this paragraph within thirty (30) days of the Commencement Date. Each party waives any rights of recovery against the other for injury or loss due to hazards covered by their property insurance, and each patty shall require such insurance policies to contain a waiver of recovery against the other. Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 5 of 15 17. Assignments or Transfers. Lessor may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement to any person or entity without any requirement for prior approval by Lessee, provided that such assignee or transferee agrees in writing to fulfill the duties and obligations of the Lessor in said Lease Agreement, including the obligation to respect Lessee's rights to nondisturbanee and quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the remainder of the Term and any Renewal Term hereof. Lessee may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement without prior approval by Lessor to any of Lassee's partners, shareholders, members, subsidiaries, or affiliates, to any entity in which Lessee or any of its affiliates holds an ownership interest, or to a person or entity acquiring by purchase, merger or operation of law a majority of the value of the assets of Lessee or to any entity whose business is the ownership of telecommunication towers. Lessee shall not assign or transfer this Lease Agreement to any other person or entity without the prior written approval of Lessor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Lessee may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement upon written notice to Lessor provided that any such assignee assumes all of Lassee's obligations hereunder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Lessee may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer without consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing entity, or agent on behalf of any financing entity to whom Lessee (i) has obligations for borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by loans, bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations under or with respect to letters of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof. 18. Subleases. Lessee at its sole discretion shall have the right, without any need to obtain the consent of Lessor, to license or sublease all or a portion of the Premises and the Lassee's Facilities to others whose business includes the provision of wirolass communication services. Lessee's licensee(s) and sublessee(s) shall be entitled to modify the Lessee's Facilities and to erect additional improvements on the Premises including but not limited to antennas, dishes, cabling, additional storage buildings or equipment shelters as are reasonably required for the operation and maintenance of the communications equipment to be installed on the Premises by said licensee(s) and sublassee(s). Lessee's licensee(s) and sublassee(s) shall be entitled to all rights of ingress and egress to the Premises and the right to install utilities on the Premises as if said licensee or sublessee were the Lessee under this Lease Agreement. 19. Nondisturbance and Quiet Enioymentl Subordination[ Estoppel Certificates. (a) So long as Lessee is not in default under this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall be entitled to quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the term of this Lease Agreement or any Renewal Term, and Lessee shall not be disturbed in its occupancy and use of the Premises. (b) This Lease Agreement shall be subordinate to each and every deed of trust, mortgage or other security instrument which may now or hereafter affect Lessor's Real Property and to any renewals, extensions, supplements, amendments, modifications or replacements thereof. In confirmation of such subordination, Lessee shall execute and deliver promptly any certificate of subordination that Lessor may reasonably request, provided that such certificate acknowledges that this Lease Agreement remains in full force and effect, recognizes Lessee's right to nondisturbance and quiet enjoyment of the Premises so long as Lessee is not in default under this Lease Agreement, only contains true and accurate statements and Lessee's liability shall be capped at the remaining rent under this Lease Agreement. If any mortgagee or lender succeeds to Lessor's interest in Lessor's Real Property through a foreclosure proceeding or by a deed in lieu of foreclosure, Lessee shall attom to and recognize such successor as Lessor under this Lease Agreement. Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 6 of 15 (c) At any time upon not less than ten (10) days' prior written notice by Lessor, Lessee shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to Lessor or any other party specified by Lesser a statement in writing certifying that this Lease Agreement is in full force and effect, if true, and the status of any continuing defaults under this Lease Agreement. 20. Indemnifications. (a) Lessee's Indemnity. Lessee hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Lessor and Lessor's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors harmless from and against any and all losses, claims, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) and injuries (including personal injuries or death) arising from or in connection with Lassee's use, operation, maintenance or repair of Lessee's Facilities at the Premises or access over Lessor's Real Property or Lessee's shared use of Lessor's easements for access to the Premises, except those resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor or Lessor's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. (b) Lessor's Indemnity. Lessor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Lessee and Lessee's officers, directors, partakers, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors harmless l-Yom and against any and all losses, claims, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) and injuries (including personal injuries or death) arising from or in connection with Lessor's use, operation, maintenance or repair of improvements on Lessor's Real Property, Lessor's shared use of easements for access to Lessor's Real Property, any violation of governmental regulations relating to the Premises and any towers used by Lessee (including the lighting or painting for aviation pathways), except those resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of Lessee or Lessee's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. (c) Survival of Indemnity Provisions. The indemnity provisions of this section shall survive the expiration, cancellation or expiration of this Lease Agreement. 21. Hazardous Materials. Lessee agrees that it will not use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Lessor's Real Property in violation of any law or regulation. Lessor represents, warrants and agrees (1) that neither Lessor nor, to Lessor's knowledge, any third party has used, generated, stored or disposed of, or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material (defined below) on, under, about or within Lossor's Real Property in violation of any law or regulation, and (2) that Lossor will not, and will not permit any third party to use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within Lessor's Real Property in violation of any law or regulation. Lessor and Lessee each agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other and the other's partners, affiliates, agents and employees against any and all losses, liabilities, claims and/or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) arising from any breach of any representation, warranty or agreement contained in this paragraph. As used in this paragraph, "Hazardous Material" shall mean petroleum or any petroleum product, asbestos, any substance known by the state in which Lessor's Real Property is located to cause cancer and/or reproductive toxicity, and/or any substance, chemical or waste that is identified as hazardous, toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. This paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 7 of 15 22. Notices and Deliveries. Any notice or demand required to be given herein shall be made by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, confirmed fax, or reliable overnight delivery service to the address of the respective parties set forth below: Lessor: Arthur V. Junge 418 Moulton Hill Rd Lyman, NH, 03585 Attn: Arthur V. Junge Telephone: 603 838 8982 Facsimile: Federal Taxpayer ID Number:. MetroPCS New York, LLC 2250 Lakeside Boulev~d Richardson, TX 75082 Attn: Property Manager Telephone: 215-265~2550 Facsimile: 866-457-4126 With a copy to: MetroPCS 5 Skyline Dr. Hawthorne, NY 10532 Attn: Property Manager Lessor or Lessee may from time to time designate any other address for notices or deliveries by written notice to the other party. 23. Miscellaneous. (a) Severabilit3'. If any provision of the Lease Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction with respect to any party, the remainder of this Lease Agreement or the application of such provision to persons other than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected, each provision of this Lease Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law, and the parties shall negotiate in good faith to amend this Lease Agreement to retain the economic effect of the invalid or unenforceable provisions. (b) Bindine Effect. Each party represents and warrants that said party has full power and authority, and the person(s) executing this Lease Agreement have full power and authority, to execute and deliver this Lease Agreement, and that this Lease Agreement constitutes a valid and binding obligation of each party, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other laws affecting the enfomement of creditor's rights generally and by general equitable principles (whether enforcement is sought in proceedings in equity or at law). This Lease Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and permitted assignees of the respective parties. (c) Waivers. No provision of this Lease Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by a party unless tho waiver is in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 Coumy Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 8 of 15 the waiver is attempted. No custom or practice which may develop between the parties in the implementation or administration of the terms of this Lease Agreement shall be construed to waive or lessen any right to insist upon strict performance of the terms of this Lease Agreement. (d) Governing Law. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State in which the Premises are located. (e) Attorneys' Fees and Costs. The prevailing party in any legal claim arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs. (f) Survival. Terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement which by their sense and context survive the termination, cancellation or expiration of this Lease Agreement will so survive. (g) Memorandum of Lease. Lessor acknowledges that a Memorandum of Agreement substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit C will be recorded by Lessee in the Official Records of the County where the Property is located. (h) Entire Agreement; Amendments. This Lease Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding Lessee's lease of the Premises and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous offers, negotiations and other agreements concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Lease Agreement must be in writing and executed by duly authorized representatives of both parties. (i) No Presumptions Regarding Preparation of Lease Agreement. Thc parties acknowledge and agree that each of the parties has been represented by counsel or has had full opportunity to consult with counsel and that each of the parties has participated in the negotiation and drafting of this Lease Agreement. Accordingly it is the intention and agreement of the parties that the language, terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement are not to be construed in any way against or in favor of any party hereto by reason of the roles and responsibilities of the parties or their counsel in connection with the preparation of this Lease Agreement. Site No,: N Y 7314 Site Addmss:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 9 of 15 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:2 1855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 10 of 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Lease Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates set forth below and acknowledge that this Lease Agreement is effective as of the date first above written. LESSOR: Arthur V. Jun/g,e, an i~dividu~l (Signaturel ' Print Name: ~ ~'-~ Title: By: Print Name: Title: Date: (Signature) LESSEE: MetroPCS New a Delaware limited liabj)~f~/~ompany (Signature) Print Name: Dan Olmetti Title: Date: VP-General .Manager-New York Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchoguo, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 11 of 15 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF LESSOR'S REAL PROPERTY to the Lease Agreement dated ,200__, by and between Arthur V. Junge, an individual as Lessor, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Lessee. Lessor's Property of which Premises are a part is described as follows: ALL that ~neJn plot, piec~ or p~;cl of land, with th~ buildings end improvm~ts thareon ~-"ctad, ~ituam, lyin8 ~d I~n8 ~t Cutohosu~, Town of Southold. County of Sulfolk and State of New York. being more pnrticolnrly bounded and de.:riled as follows: BEGINNING at a point on tim northwest llno of Middle Rend (C.R. 48) 750 fi~et mom or les~ southwe~'ly nine8 sald line from Cox's Lane, ~id point I~ing the southes~t comor of thc premises h~'eln denon'bed ~d the southwest comer ofl~nd now or formerly of Joseph $choen~t~in; RUNNING THENCE aloes the northw~t llno of Middle Road (C.R. 48) Snuth 25 de~mes $2 minutes 30 seconds We~ 168.17 feet lo Innd of Hartis; RUNNING THENCE nIong said [snd North 60 desrees 54 mlnutes 20 seconds West. 252.68 feet m hind ofth, Town of $outhold; RUNNING THENCE nlo~8 said I~nd North 23 de~'ees 14 minute~ oo ~conds East, 188.15 feet to land ofthe par~y of the first pm', RU.NNINO THENCE alon8 said I~d South 56 desreea 42 minut~ 30 seconds Easl.~26~6,feet to the point or piece of BEGINNING, / /5~ Assessors Parcel Number: Section 096, Block 0001, Lot 019.001 ~ / ~ Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 12 of 15 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES to the Lease Agreement dated ,200~ by and between Arthur V. Junge, an individual as Lessor, and MetroPCS New York LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Lessee. The Premises consist of those specific areas described/shown below or attached where Lessee's communications antennae, equipment and cables occupy Lessor's Real Property. The Premises and the associated utility connections and access, including easements, ingress, egress, dimensions, and locations as described/shown, are approximate only and may be adjusted or changed by Lessee at the time of construction to reasonably accommodate sound engineering criteria and the physical features of Lessor's Real Property. See Attached Drawings (A final drawing or copy of a prolaerty survey or site plan depicting the above shall replace this Exhibit 1~ when initialed by Lessor or Lessor's designated agent and may be modified from time to time when initialed by both Lessor and Lessee.) Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 13 ot'15 EXHIBIT C MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CLERK: Please return this document to: MetroPCS New York, LLC 5 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 Attn.: Property Manager This Me~norandum of Agreement is entered into on this day of ., 200 , by and between Arthur V. Jung, an individual with an office at 418 Moulton Hill Rd, Lyman, NH, 03585 (hereinafier referred to as "Lessor"), and MetroPCS New York LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with an office at Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 (hereinafter referred to as "Lessee"). Lessor and Lessee entered into a Communications Site Lease Agreement ["Agreement"] on the day of , , for the purpose &installing, operating and maintaining a communications facility and other improvements. All of the foregoing is set forth in the Agreement. The term of the Agreement is for five (5) years commencing on the date Lessee begins construction of Lessee facility, or eighteen (18) months from full execution of the Lease Agreement, whichever first occurs ("Commencement Date") and terminating on the fii~h anniversary of the Commencement Date, with four (__4.__~) successive five (5) year options to renew. In no event shall the term of the Agreement exceed thirty-five (35) years. 3. The Land which is the subject of the Agreement is described in Exhibit A annexed hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Agreement as of the day and year first above written. LESSOR: LESSEE: __Arthur V. Junge a(an) individual_ By: Title: Date: MetroPCS New York LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Title: Date: Site No.: N Y 7314 Sita Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 14 of 15 STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, ., Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the witbin instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacit(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public STATE OF COUNTY OF On ., before me, , Nomry Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evldonce) to be the person(s) whose nmne(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacit(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the pemon(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS ~ny hand and official seal. Notary Public (SEAL) Site No.: N Y 7314 Site Address:21855 County Rd 48, Cutchogue, NY I 1935 EXECUTION COPY 7.2.09 Page 15 of 15 F ral Communications Comn ion Wire. l:~$s' Tele,¢ommuni:cafions Bu rea u Radio Sfctfion Autl orizafion Page t O:f~ 2 93 LICENSEE NAME: r4etr~oPCS :A~S LLC FCC Registration Num~r,(FRN) Ca!l:S!gn File 'Number Radio A~ - AW,S, 1~iQ-I~5/2'~ 10-2d55 ~z ~n~ Grant D~fe ~ 1 ~ 2:9 - E~pkation. Date Print D~ l 1- 2~~-~02 t 1 ~ - 30~2006 Market Number REAO0~ Sub- M~lrk~f De~ignafe~ 0 Market Name: NOrtheast ~id Build-aUi Date 4th Build~)Ut Dote 1 st Build-out Date 2rid= BUiI~t~OUf Date. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS 'this ~uthor tzar ~on ts cond'i{t:on~d :L~POfl the 1 ~o-e~ee,; p~:~: ~ ifl'~ t ~at ing ~e~a~ns: t ~om any base f~xed station, m~ging peak,able ~p~s to= cooRd]na~e ~e~enG~ usage w!'t~ k-~o~n co~ch~e] ~nd ~710-17~5 MHz Band. pub:~i:c N~t;i,ce, ~CC: 06,50; ~B~DocEa~ No. 0'2-35~, .el. ApP~l 20. 2.0~': . ("$peci~t Conditions or Wa Conditions: Pursuant to Secflor1309(h) ~f the Comrnunicdt~enS ACf,~,~"]93Zt, i,,a~ .amended, :~7 U;S,c, ,Se~fl~n-3Og(h); this lioens~.:[s ~ubjec1 I~ the following conditions: This lie.eriSa S~ ! ~:y~!'in:the li~ens~e,qny:.H9htfo operate the st~ion no~ ~:ny~ght in:~e u~e:offhe frequencies defign~ted in the::i[~ense,beYe~ the, t~rmt~er~°f'n:or :!~ spy ~her manner than sumner[Zed h~e[m ~eitbe~ the ~io~ 706 ~f the Communicafio~s,.A'ct:of 1~34. as ame:nded~ ,see 47 U.s.c, SeCtJen 606~ To view the geographio ama.~, ~soci,af~,~' Wlth the ii~n~..g.o tq fha, Uhiver~al Licensing ~yst~m (UL.$) homepage,~t hftp:/lw~releSs.f~c;~'govt U!s,cm~t ~leet ~l.t¢~ise Search, Follow =fh~? O~ruchans eR hew t~ sea.feb for hcens~ m!on'n~t~m February 2006 Call Sign File Number Prinl' Date ~/Q;GATS 1 0D~277~'~0 I 1 - 30-20~ FCC6Ol - MB Federal Aviation A~ams' ' Wation Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 Aeronautical Study No. 2010-AEA-570-OE Prior Study No. 2009-AEA-2718-OE Issued Date: 02/26/2010 Mare Harris HPC Development, LLC 52 Garden Ave. Wharton, NJ 07885 ** DETERMINATION OF NO H~ZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concernln~: SWacture: Location: Latitude: Longitude: Heights: Antenna - Top Mount NY7314 Cutchogue, NY 41-0146.56N NAD 83 72-29-50.36W 113 feet above ground level (AGL) 173 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the stmcturo does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a haTard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be completed and returned to this office any time the project is abandoned or: __ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part I) X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, Part II) As a result of this structure being critical to flight safety, it is required that the FAA be kept appraised as to the status of the project. Failure to respond to periodic FAA inquiries could invalidate this determination. This aeronautical study included evaluation of a s~'ucture that exists at this time. Action will be taken to ensure aerlmautical charts are updated to reflect the most current coordinates, elevation and height as indicated in the case description. Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory eiroular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination expires on 08/26/2011 unless: (a) Co) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office. the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within Page 1 of 3 6 months of the ~ of this determinatioa In such case, thin,ruination expires on thc date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or thc date the FCC denies the applicatien~ NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED TO THIS OFFICE AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, thi~ equipment ~hall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this slructure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and docs not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) because the structure is subject to their licensing authority. If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (718) 553-4542. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2010-AEA-570-OE. Signature Control No: 681442-123122126 Katie Venticinque Specialist Attachment(s) Frequency Data cc: FCC cc: NACO w/map ( DNE ) Page 2 of 3 -~ ~ · ' eequency Data for ASN 2010-AEA-5~)E LOW FR~Q~N~ ~GH FREQ~N~ FREQ~N~ UNIT ERP 806 824 MHz 500 W 824 849 MHz 500 W 851 866 MHz 500 W 869 894 MHz 500 W 896 901 MHz 500 W 901 902 MHz 7 W 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W 932 932.5 Mttz 17 dBW 935 940 MHz 1000 W 940 941 MHz 3500 W 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W 2305 2310 MHz 2000 W 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W 1730 1740 MHz 61 6Bm 2130 2140 MHz 61 dBm Page 3 of 3 Town of Southold, New York - Pa' ~ment Voucher Vendor Telephone Number ~v~o~ C~eS/ - Number Date Vendor AOdress CMS 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Net Pu~hase Order Numb,r Check No. Entered by Audit Date ~own Clerk General Ledger F~md and Account Number Payee Certification Department Certification Signat~ure , ~ Client: Southold NY Metro PCS 21855CR48Cutchogue J ~ Invoice ft:96911-003(21303) Invoice The Center for Municipal Solulions Date: Description 2-Nov Rev~w information with Dick C. 3-Nov Research OSHA & Letter Informaticn 3-Nov Email response / comments 7-Nov 70 Cambridge Dr. Glenmonl. NY 12077 (518)439-3079 review, revise and distribute review letter of supplemental information TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 725.00 I, Richard A. Comi, certify that the above account in the amount of $ 725.00 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbursements cha~ged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and thai the amount claimed is actually due. 12/01/11 Dale Signature 12/30/2011 $ $ 725.00 (Electronic Signalure) Hrs Rate: Expenses. Amount 0.5 $ 250.00 $ 125.00 0.8 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 0.4 $ 250.00 $ 100.00 1.2 $ 250.00 $ 3(30.00 PLANNING BOAHD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: November 15, 2011 Re: Deferred Revenue The referenced applications have been accepted by the Planning Board and the funds may now be processed to revenue B2115.10. Thank you. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check Date/No. Type ~ MetroPCS NY, LLC at Junge Site Plan Application fee 96-1-19.1 $1,000.00 5/6/10 - ~L5542 MetroPCS NY, LLC at Junge Special Exception fee 96-1-19.1 $1,000.00 5/6/10 - #5543 LR Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher Vendor Name Vendor Telephone i'44nnbe~ V~dor~ontaet / hvoiee ~voiee Net N~bg Date Tot~ ~seo~t Amo~ ~met qCqll-Oo2 Vendor No. ---7 Vendor Address Nhlmber Description of Goods m- Ser~%es ;Zsoq~ Co,,~A~',,? ) CheckNo. Entered by Audit Date Town Clerk General Ledger Fund and Account ?,hlmber Payee Cerfificatio~ Signature -~'k~ ~ Company Name Department Certification Client: Southold NY Metro PCS 21855 CR 48 Cutchogue Invoice #:96911-002(21303) Invoice The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Con,bridge Dr. Glenmont, NY 12077 (518)439-3079 Date: Description 8-Sap review application material with consultant Review all site info and application matedal wilh discussions and prepare 9-Sap recommendation letter to PB. 11 -Sap Review all site info and application material and prepare recommendation leiter 1o Planning Board. 12-Sap cait from Heather Lanza to discuss status of review 12-Sap review, revise and dlstdbule application review letter 15-Sap call from Heather lanza on application requirements TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 1,850.00 I, Richard A. Corot, cedlfy that the above account in lhe amount of $ 1,850.00 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbumements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not inciuded; and that the amount claimed is actually due 10/01/1 1 ~. ~,,~ f¢,,~¢¢ Date Sign atu re 10/27/2011 Hrs Rate: Expenses. Amount 0.3 $ 250.00 $ 75.00 2.7 $ 250.00 $ 675.00 2.0 $ 250.00 $ 500.00 0.3 $ 250.00 $ 75.00 1.8 $ 250.00 $ 450,00 0.3 $ 250.00 $ 75.00 (Electronic Signature) $ $ 1,850.00 Town of Southold, New York Vendor Name V~ador No. - Payment Voucher Vendor Addre~ Check No. Audit Date Town Clerk Number Invoice Payee Certification Signatur ~ Title (~ L.~r'~ Company Name C/1~5 Date General Ledger Fund and Account Number Signature Department Certification Client: Southold NY Metro PCS 21855 CR 48 Cutchogue ~nvoice sc'~v~ 1000-96-1-191 The Center [or Municipal Solutions Invoice #:96911-001 (21303) 70 Cambridge Dr. Glenment, NY 12077 (518)439-3079 Date: Description prepare and send leSer to PB as requested by client - lhis cost necessitated 16-Aug by applisanl TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 125.00 I, Richard A. Coral, certil~ that the above account in the amount of $ 125.00 is true and correct; that the items, services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on lhe dates stated; that ne part has been paid or salisfled; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is ac~ualJy due. 9/01/11 .~, .,,~ Date Signature Hrs Rate: Expenses, 0,5 $ 250.00 $ (Electronic Signature) 10/28/2011 Amount 125.00 125.00 NOV - 1 2011 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: October 27, 2011 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached check into deferred account B691. It represents Consultant fee for a wireless application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check Date/No. Type # Authorization Code MetroPCS-NY at Junge: Wireless 96-1-19.1 9/20/11 - 7624 consultant fee $6,000 LR Att, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southo]d, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: August 12, 2011 Re: Check The attached check is a consultant escrow fee for a wireless facility review. Please deposit into B691 deferred account. Thank you. Applicant/Project Name Tax Map Amount Check & Type # bate/No. MetroPCS at CR 48 Cutchogue 96-1-19.1 $2,500 5/6/11 - #7243 LR cc: file · PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: July 2, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached check into a deferred account. Fee is for a site plan application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check bate/No. Type ~ Authorization Code MetroPCS New York, LLC at Junge 96-1-19.1 5/6/10 - #5542 Site Plan Application Fee $1,000. CK Att. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: July2, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached checks into a deferred account. T4~.y represent~a Wireless Special Exception Fee for an application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & I Tax Map Type I ~: MetroPC$ New York at Junge Amount Check bate/No. Authocization Code 96-1-19.1 $1,000 5/6/10 - 5543 CK Arts. P.O. BOX 3 Wireless for All TEL: 732.888.6210 · FAX: 732.847.4335 ~ir~l~ ~or ~11. ~ f 5 S~LINE DRIVE ~. ~. TITLE ~1~ ~, T-I TITLE ~H~ET A 5 ELEVATON A , * ~mm~ 2lb55 14. ~ ~ ~ IN ~LI~E I ~ ~TION TO ~ IN ~A~E ~1~ ~ ~1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B" ~[Nl~ A~ 5" ~1~ Wireless for 15. ~ ~ffi 5~ 5~ ~ ~ F~IGA~ A~ ~ IN ~E ~1~ Al% ~ ~ ~ ~ AT ~N¢~[~ E~. ~ TOP B~ AT ~ ~ ~ffi ~ ~ ~1~ ~OH ~ ~5. ~-LOCATION MIN. LOT ~ I~ FT. 2~S.I& ~. ~ 5HAN~ TAX LOT t17.5 ~ ~m~ ~= / g~. A MIN. F~YA~ 5e~K '~. ~.4~. 2'O..~. ~~ N/0~ T0~ OF S0Um~ ~ j~ ~j/ ~ ~ E N G I N E ~ g [ N G I "'"'~ ~ ~ '~.~ ~ N23© ' ,,_~ - ~ J J J ~ Y~ ~ J (RE~I D-~BIT OIA~/Io me CS ~ ~ ~ i 5 S~LINE DroVE ~ < ~ ~ J[~ ~ ~ HA~HO~E, NYl~32 ~ ~1 I~ ~ . ~TAX LOT ~0.1 ~ ~ ~ N/O~ CHRIST0~H~ M~R ~ ~o~; O~MP~TSOI4 o ~ " MTS ~P~ ~/22/~ ~o. o~m~ S 25 5230 W 168.1T (~a..-~T) MIDDLE (120' WIDE) RO~ (c...-4s) (NORm ROAD) (~Yo~) ~ A R C H I T E C T U R E ~ ~-~m ~345 ~- ~ GE~209 Z ,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~,~ ~ ~ ~AI~) MTs JP~ ~/22/~ ' I ~A~TI~ 5I~ PLAN 2 { EQUIPMENT FLAN A = 2 4 - GROUP: iq~r~: I I~ ~1 --~ 7 .....~ P.O. BOX3 '~ /~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~75 TOP OF EXISTIN~ ~ ~2m ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ Wirele~ for All. ~ ~5 ~ 5 S~LINE DRI~ ~¢~~ ~ I.'_1 ,,. - ~~6~ HI~INLI~~// I~;:~1~' I~"e~4V4"I~O * OABLE PORT OETAIL5 4 I 150UTH~ST BLEVATION ¢,o,'a~i~r:a~t~4!~. ~'..~' ~o~c~=-'m~,~ .~~ ~ D E S I ~ No ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ GROUP5 / ~2 '~ ARCHITECTURE * ~T ~6~ ~ 2 ~ ~ - ~ 028992-1 ~ ' g 075384 SIDE EL~ATION F.NT EL~ATION m I ~ UTILI~ HOUNT DETAIL ~ ~ PROPOSE~ ~0~ LIGHT ~OI~IOATION5 Wireless for ~1. il I I b ~,-~*'~ "" ' m ~ ~n BILL OF ~ATE~IAL& ¢O-LOOATION 4 I~ ~OUNTIN~ DETAIL A ~ 4 v -- I ~ GROUPe ] I [ - & ARCHITECTURE '° ' · ENGINEERING ~ k~ ~: ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k~ ~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~L: 732.888.6210 ..... ~J , L ........ ~ ~- ~ 028~2-1 ~' ~ 0153~ ~- ~ 2~75 { EOUIPMENT SUPPORT F~ME PLAN ~.St~ ~t j e~ (~ ~A~L ~) Wireless for ~l. DETAIL 4 ] DETAIL , 5 S~LIHE DroVE I ~ETAIL HA~HOR~E) NY ~0532 ~ ~' oqM~T~OI4 f~~ I I'~" ~ 21855 GOUN~ ROAD 48 . '-_~ .~ :. ?..' . .' "..' .... ,... ..... . -. .....' .. · '. . ' .. , .- ... : . , /. .. · . 5H[ET TITLE ~1~ F~ATION D~AIL5 AND EX[STIN5 ~ ~ ~ ~UI~[NW ELEVATION5 ]EOUI~ENT,/4.=,,~. I ELEVATION (P~ONT Vl~ DESIGN~ G R. C) l_J P~ y EXISTING MONOPOLE ~ x ARCHITECTURE P. O. BOX 3 x ~ 732.888.6210 -$1~IP~-2~f~~)~ ~ 2n ~ F~: 732.847.4335 ~-~ 028992-1 ~- ~ 0753~ 4'~' ~ [ AN~NNA T-A~M MOUNT ~ETAIL~ I : ~ Wireless for ~1. ~ 5 S~LINE DRI~ HA~HORNE, HY 10532 // TPENC-.,E ~ OA"FE ELEVATION (..ABLE MOUNTIN~ PLAN AT P-OUNP lvI~MBE~ (PAIF('T TO ~ATCH i~L.~) [GABLE I'4OUNTIN~ DETAIL DESIGN0 GROUP~z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW'JERSEY 0~730 TEE: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 Lou Moglino, AJA [ Robert W. Toms P.E Nj' -,¢ AZ ~4-5 ~-/~ GE 36209 PA - ~ 061412 Wireless for All. 5 SKYLINE DRIVE HAWTHORNE, NY 10632 kiTs JPo O5/22/0~ SHEET TITLE ENGINEERING v.o. nox 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 F~: 732.847.4335 MOo ~ ]Ro~ W. Toms P.E. Wireless,~. ~1. EOUI~M~NT 5~CI~ICATIONS ^ ~.oo~r,.=,~,~,~,.~,~ T,~ '~'*~/~' '~'~ D E S I G N° ~ ~ ARCHITECTURE ~.~. ~uMo~o,~ Ro~W. To~ P.E. ~T VI~IIJ 51DE V~E~ ~ - ~ ~ ~345 ~- ~ GE 36209 O° ~ ~0 ~ T~ T~ ~'i ~/~' ~ ~ PA - ~ ~14~ I I . :~ ~ ~'* ~A~ =~ ~) ~r~ ~v ~, i~ Wireless for All. ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~T ~Ni ~1~ ~, N~I~ ~~~ ~ I I ~-LOCATION ~ ~ ~. ~T~ ~ ~/22/~ ~ i,~ATHE,~, p,~.oot= FAX: 732.847.4335 ~- ~ 2~75 WIRING METHODS LEOEND Wireless for All, 5 S~LINE D~VE HA~HO~E~ NY q0532 SITE INFOrmATION SPECIAL EMPHASIS, CONCERNS, AND LIMITATIONS SYMBOLS 2~a~ couN~ ~oA~ CUTOHO~U~, Nm ~1~5 ~T~ (~NI~ ~O~N) ELEOTRIGAL NOTE~ ~ ~IGATIO~ O~l~ ANP I N~O~NATIOb NxX AI~CHITECTURE __= * ENGINEERING -~c:I HAMLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 J ~ Wireless for ~1. ~M~U~, N~ I Iq~ I ~SI~ ~LA~ D~G~I~ION ~1~ 6OND~IT ME~ PTO MO~O~LL L~ ~ hl~ 1¢4/0 ARCHITECTURE ~. t=u M~lino, ~ ~ ~T ~0~ THE ~OINT 2 IAN~NNA ~OUN~IN~ ~ETAIL ~ ~ .,.,~ ~ / Wireless for ~1. A~3~ ~ O. AN~NNA CO~I~ C~. ~UT~HOSUE, N~ 11~5 ~' " ~ ~I~T ~ELL DETAIL ~' ~ CON--eTlON PA~IT CAT~O~" CTAP ~-LO~ATION ~ --- ~~Lc~ 5~1N5 KIT TO ~'~" ~ I HT~ JP~ ~/22/~ - ~ ~ = fro ~E ~IF~) 12. TO ~XT ANeNt. ~, . ~ DESIGNo ~ ,, r GROUP_Z ~.~Th'E~IN~ ~IT A R C H I T E C T U R E I TO ~ a~a C~ ~A~LE 15 5 ~ 20 LI~T ~0,~ Rob~W. To~ P.E. ~A ~ 2' , ~AGE PA-~1412 Lm ~ sa, ,~r ~A, ,~r ~ ~;t~. ~TON INSET CO~A~ Wirele~ for All. I/4"~, ~O~1-4 (I~LAT~), ~1~ (5/~" 5 $~LINE D~VE /7 LO~), ~A-~ (~L M~NTIN~ HA~HORNE, ~ 10532 2. ~D~LIC~LY CO~ LON~ 5A~L SITE INFOrmATION H~ AT BE~ ~11~ O~ E~. 2J855 COUN~ ~OAO 48 ~M ~1~ TO M~ ~1~ A~ TN~ HAIN ~IN~ ~NNECT ~lNe ~e TO ~ ~0~ MTs JP¢ 05/22/~ I~OI~NT CABINET SIN6L5 LINE ~ROUND DtA6RAH 5 I~AST5~ ~OUNO ~A~ TErmINATION OETAIL s. ~VlpE L~KT'~ r~ LOCKE. ~ TO ~ 4 4 I PI-(. PANEL .5C'.HEDULE 200 AMP MAIN '34. OI~¢UIT 120/240V 2 TAX LOT #17.5 N/O/F TOWN OF SOUTHOLD '[~'~ 5l ,-2.2'NW _~- 23o14,~'-~ E F E N cE , z :¢....:.:......t ...::. m 5:.:. ............ ":~:; ......... ~.._.:~:..~. .... b ........ - ~= .~ ._ ~ ~--~ ~f~- J APPROXIMATE LOCADON OF ~ ~ ~R ZON EASEMENT (RECORD-EXIBIT "A" V105786) ~ ~ ...... UNDERGROUND VERIZON ~RELESS CONDUIT (RECORD-EXlBIT "A" V106723) ASPHALT TAX LOT ~19.1 EDGE OF ASPHALT AREA: 13.1'5W 45,589 Sq.F. 1.0465 Acres ASPHALT PARKING PARKING JW -~ g / LILCO ~TIWTY POLE ROOF OVER ~21855 1 slY METAL (AUTO SHOP) 105.15' C O N C R E T E P A V E M~-~ T ROOF OVER GRASS WOOD CURB ELEO. CONDU'T S 25°52'30'' W (,MARK-OUT') NOTES: I. THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON, FROM THE PROPERTY LINES TO THE STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE. TUEREFORE THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO MONUMENT PROPERTY UNES OR TO GUIDE THE ERECTION OF FENCES, ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. 2. CONSULT ~MTH THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT BEFORE DESIGNING, INSTALUNG OR MODIFY}NO ANY NEW OR EXIS~NG CURBS, WALKS OR ROADWAYS IN THE STREET SHO'C~N HEREON. 3.SUBSURFACE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS RASED ON VISUAL OBSERVATIONS, VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS, AND/OR PRIVATE UTIUTY COMPANIES RECORDS, AND/OR UTILITY MARKOUT. THIS SURVEYOR ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY OF THIS DATA. SUBSURFACE UTIUTIES ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY ARB/OR COMPLETENESS. 4.ALL SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATION AND DEPTH SHOULD BE RECHECKED AND LEGAL GRADES SHOULD BE VERIFIED ~TH THE TOPOGRAPHICAL BUREAU, PREFERABLY IN ~ITING REFORE COMMENONG FINAL DESIGN OR COf*ISTRUCTION. 5. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO VISIBLE STREAMS OR NA~JRAL WATER CCURCES IN THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. [' 6. REFER TO ARTICLE 56 OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW AND THE PROVISIONS OF INDUSTRIAL CODE PART (RULE NO. 53) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOUTION IS COMMENCED. THESE LAWS REQUIRE EACH EXCAVATOR TO GIVE ADVANCE NOTICE TO ALL OPERATORS OF UNDERGRQUND FACILITIES OF HIS INTENT TO PERFORM EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION IN THE SPECIFIED AREAS. 7. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN U.S. STANDARD MEASUREMENTS. 8. EASEMENTS NOT SHOVel ARE NOT GUARANTEED. ]ll22155 1 STY FRAME TAX LOT #20.1 N/O/F CHRISTOPHER MOHR CRASS 703.52'(ACTuAL) :1:750' (DEED) UTILITY POLE 168.17' MIDDLE 0 20' ~DE) ROAD (NORTH ROAD) SURVEY OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT: #21855 C.R.-48, CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK DISTRICT ....... 1000, SECTION ....... 96 BLOCK ....... 1, LOT(S) ....... 19.1 ARKADIUSZ JUSIEGA, P.L.S j~; AR~ SUR~NG COMP~ Sco~e: Volley Stream, NY 11.580 Job No: ~ ~: ~ ~L: (516) 792--6676 ASC-~112 M~ DESIGN GROUP, Inc. SITE INFOF~M4,TION: ZONE~ LATITUDE~ ~ROUND ELEVATION: ~XISTIN5 USE: LOT 51ZE: TOTAL LEASE AREA: "LI" LIGHT INDJJSTRIAL N41° 01' 4~.55" NAD ¢5 /i"/2' 2q' EO.5~" NAD ~5 ~0'-0" AMSL AUTOMOBILE RBPAI~ AN~ P~BLI¢ UTILITY ~LECOHHWNICATION~ PAClLI~ NO CHANe~ 45,55q 5~UARE FEET 5&O 5~UARE FEET LIST: SHEET T-I Z-2 Z-2A Z-4 DESCRIPTION: TITLE SHEET PROPERTY MAPS ¢ INFORMATION SITE PLAN ~ ZONIN5 INFORMATION PROPOSED EdlUIPMENT OFF~ETS PARTIAL 51TE PLAN ~ E~IPHENT PLA~ HONOPOLE ELEVATION ~ DETAIL5 E~IPHE~T ~ETAIL5 CONT,6,CTS: 51TE CONTACT: ARTHUR JUNSE - 603-535-5q52 O/INER INFORMATION~ APPLICANT, ATTORNEY= ARTHUR JUNDE 415 MOULTON HILL ROAD LYMAN, NH 03555 METRO PCS ND"t YORK, L.L.C. HA/ITHORNE, NY 10552 RE, NIELSEN, HUBER ¢ COUDHLIN, LLP 5~ NORTH N~/I YORK AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NY 11945 I~L. (&51) 425-4100 FAX. (eEl) 425-4104 SCOPE OF UO~K: INSTALLATION OF (4) Edl[JIPMENT CABINETS ON NE/I CONCRE~ SLAB. INSTALLATION OF A 12' MONOPOLE EXTENSION. INSTALLATION OF (~) PANEL ANTENNAS ON EX[STiNt= MONOPOLE. INSTALLATION OP NEH ~' HIgH CHAIN LINK FENCE AND 4' ~lPE ACCESD ~ATE ~ITH PRIVACY DbA% AND BARBED ~IEE TO MATCH ~XI~TIN~. INDTALLAT~ON OF COAXIAL CABLES ROUTED ALON5 NE~ CABLE B~IDSE NOTES: I) CONSTf~CTION TO CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TO/IN OF SOUTHOLD. 2.) THE PROPOSED COMPOUND IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY AND THEREFORE NO PARKIN¢ HAG BEEN PROVIDED. 5) THE PROPODED MOBILE E~LJIPMENT DOED NOT RE~IRE A PERMANENT OCCUPANCY, IT ID AN ~NHANNE~ PACILI~, AND THEEE~O~ REQUIRED NO POTABLE 4) THIS 51TE ~ILL BE VID~TED ON AN AVEEADE EVERY FOUR TO DIX ~EE~ PE~OD FO~ HA~N~NANCE AND 5HALL BE HONITORED ~EOH A ~HOTE FACILI~. 5) THI5 ~OPODED 51~ ONLY RE~UI~5 ELEC~I6 AND TELEPHONE CONNECTION¢ 5HALL BE DETEEHINED BY THE APPEOPEJA~ UT~LI~ ¢OHPANY UPON APPROVAL. &) 5ITE LIDHTIN¢ ~LL BE EE~IRED. 9) THROE DRA~IN~D A~B BDIN5 PREPARED FO~ THE PU~PODE5 OF MUNICIPAL AND ADENDY ~EVIE~ AND APPROVAL. THROE DEA~IND5 5HALL NOT BE UTILIZE~ FOR ¢OND~UDTION PURPOSED, UNTIL ALL ¢ONDITION5 OF APPROVAL HAVE B~N 5ATI~FIED. TO/IN CHAIRMAN: TO~N ~¢RETA~Y= DATE 60NDTRUGTION OFFICIAL: DATE SITE #: NY7314 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 SUFFOLK COUNTY DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 96 BLOCK: 1 LOT: 19.1 ZONE: "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL KEY hI~P: TO/IN OF SOU~THOLD SCALE: I":~00' (~1~11) O' 800' qO0' 1200' TOPOGF~APNIC MAP: SCALE: 1'":Ia00' (II×IU TO/IN OF 50UTHoLD 5bALE: II"=~o0' (22x34) s~'~e *~L ' ;ir '::" ': '"' ~;~t*~; . / **,~' SITE LO¢ATION, ~ ~,, i'll,l,,,, d ~;]=*J' '" , ~',:hl'l,lllI ' Z"L~*I il'' ,':,,m ,,ab,,, I: I ~ ~ ~1~ ~%~ :,:,,~, ,, ,I :~: :~,~ t I ' * ......... '~- ~ ~ 1.,.~,~, ~(,., ,~ ,,,~ ~, ~'5 · ,,'I ,~ ,: ,,' ~,,,'~ ~'-:~ ~.~ I ~ ;~(. ~'t,~%,,,~':l;,br * i,l~i ~,h!':l,,q,~,,,~,~l ,,b" ; '~'~ .... , ¢ ~.',.. ,1""" ~ ~". ':" % '"' u,.~......, . ~".......,:,,. ~ '<- O' 1200' 1800' 2400' DESIGN'u GROUP5 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 Lou Moglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ - # A113345 NY - # 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ -/~ GE 36209 NY - ¢4 075384 CT - # 22375 PA - $ 061412 Ob/04/IC iSSUED FOR FILIN~ 05/2b/Ic PATE SEAL IlmetroPCSI Wireless for All. SITE ~o~. N¥7514 SITE INFOF~MATION 21855 OOUNT'¢ t~OA~ 48 OUTOHO~LJF=, NW' I1~ SUFFOLK COUNTY ~ESI®N TYPE: CO-LOCATION. ~Jo Pi'cio SHEET TITLE DATE, O5/11/IO SHEET NUh'IDE ~. LOT NUMBER LEGEND: TOP NUM. = DISTRICT MID. NUM. = SECTION MID. NUM. = BLOCK BOTTOM NUM. -- LOT 1000 96 1 17.5 SEC BLK LOT ~ROPERTY ADDRES OWNER INFORMATION OWNER ADDRESS ZONE EXISTING LAND USE 84 1 26,3 !2355 CR 45 372 Jermho Corp Z7.355 CE 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 LI Narehouse 84 1 32.1 3264 Cox Lane Comzzln~ Realty, LLC PO Box 1281, Cutchague, NY 11935 LI Nareheuse 84 4 1 ~455 Cox Lane Cutahegue F~re Distnct 260 New S uffelk Road, CutGhogue, NY 11935 AC Reid Crops 96 1 13,1 _~1405 CR 48 F~rst Baptist Chumh 21405 CR 48, Cutchegue, NY 11935 R-40 gellgious 96 1 14 F35 Church Lane Viola S, Cross 90 Box 184, Cutchogue, NY 11932 R~40 9Ingle Family Residential 96 I 15 ~35 Church Lane Jaanette Steward 525 Old Country Road, Westhampton, NY 1197~ R40 Single Family Resdential 99 1 16 35 Church Lane Frances L, Arnold & Roland Wilson PO Box 535, Cutchegue, NY 11935 R-40 Single Family Residential ~5®®' $UFRI~OUNDINQ F~I~,OF~E~T¥ OLUNEFR$ INFOFRMATION SCALE, N.T.S. 1000 84 1 32.t //-.. I APPROXIMATE ~ I$1TELOCATIONI ~ IOO0 96 18.3 1000 96 1000 96 1000 96 14 1000 96 1000 84 1 26.3 1000 96 1 18.2 1000 84 1000 84 4 2 DISTRICT: 1000 SEC: 96 BLOCK: 1 LOT: 19.1 1000 96 2 7 VICINITY/ KEY MA~ 1000 96 1 20.1 ,/ 400' N 600' 800' DGESI -u ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 Lou Moglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-#AI13345 NY-# 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STKUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ-~GE36209 NY-~ 075384 CT- ~ 22375 PA -# 061412 ISSUED FOP. FILING U?DATED PER ATTORNEY COWENT5 ImetroPCSI Wireless for All. SITE INFOp-VATION 21SDD OOUNT"F ~OA~ 48 OUTm-_.,HOm~UT=, N"T" I Iq~ ~?ESI®N TYPE: CO-LOCATiON D~A~N BT'. SHEET 05/11/10 ~ I NT~O~--..I'4'AT I O N ZONING (NFO~1"I,AT ION ~'LI" LIGHT INDIJ~T~IAL ITEI'd REQUIREE> EXISTING EQUIPMENT MIN. LOT AREA 40,000 SQ.FT. 45,58q B.P. NO OHAN®E MIN. LOT PIlE>TH I00 FT. 168.1'1 FT. NO C.,HAN®E MIN. LOT OF=PTH 150 PT. 265.16 FT. NO 6HANGE MIN. FRONT YA~-O SET~AC, F'-- I00 FT. 236.4 FT. 210.q FT. 20 FT. 15.2 FT. '-/0.2 FT. NIIN, BiE>E `rA'R.~ BETt~AOK'-. tONE~ TOTAL 40 FT. 14B.5 FT. 180.7 PT, MIN. REAR 'rARE> SETBAC, K '70 FT. Iii FT. ~) 34.7 PT. MIN. LANDSCAPE AREA 25% N/A NO CHANGE MAX. LOT COVE"~..ADE 90% 4D.l&Fd~ 45.q5% MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT / STORIES JO0 'FT. - EXISTING TO,dER PT. / 2 112' - TOHER EXTENSION liD'-q" - TOP OF ANTENNA ADDITIONAL ~,E~t~IREI'4ENT¢ FOR ¢OHHI~NId, ATION¢ ~AX. HEIGHT ~0 FT. I00 FT.~ II5Lq'' ~AX. EQUIPHENT AREA DO0 SO. PT. N/A 660 SO. FT. ~EY: ~ EXIDTINS NON-OONPORHITT N/A NON APPLICABLE BOUNDARY INFORMATION 15 TAKEN FROM THE FOLLOHING: - A DP, Al^lING TITLED "PROPERTY SURVEY" PREPARED FOR THE PiTH DESIGN GROUP INC. ON JUN 4, 200q BY AREK SURVEYING COi'4PAN¥ NY LID. 05056q - SITE MEASURMENTE TAKEN BY THE MTH DESIGN GROUP INC. AT 51TE VISIT ON 04.1'"/.0¢1 NOTES: INSTALLATION IS IN COMPLIANCE HITH: -ALL LOCAL AND STATE BUILDING DOPES. -THE ENERGY OONSERVATION CONSTRUCTION CODE OF N¥S. 2. NO LAND$OAPING 13 PROPOSED. PROPOSED METRO PCS EQUIPMENT CABINETS (TYP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL DESIGNu RAILS ANCHORED TO NEH 15' x 16' CONCRETE SLAB IN 18' x 20' FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND (360 SQFT LEASE AREA) TAX LOT #17.5 A R C H I T E C T U R E ENGINEERING LINE) % .. , , , ~2.2'NW ~ HAZLET, NEWJERSEY07730 9~O14'00~(~ IOn;t: L I _~ ~ '10%'~10.4' F~: 732.847.4335 ~ ' ' x -- ~ ~ STORA ,=., Lou Moghno, AIA Robert W. Toms P.E. ~~ (~i=~,~R~K ARCHITECT STRUC~ ENGI~ER [~ SPROXIMATE LOCATION OF~ = ~ ¢~8° ~ RECORD-EXIBIT~ ~ ~ ~ ~~A V105786)~ [ ~ ~ < (EX~STINO ~UIPM~T TO ~ UNDER6 ERIZO ll~ ..... ~HND [~ ~ WIRE[ ~S CONDUIT / (RECOR~D-EXIBIT ~ r~r:.,, ~=, H EDGE pF ~SPHAkT * AREA: ~ ,~ METAL ,¢,,, metroPCSI CONCRETE P A ~EM E N SiT~ uos , NY7514 T,X .o= SITE INFO~WATION GRASS <~ < ~ ~ G R A S S .( I ;OUTOHO~UE, NY I1~ woo9 ~750' (U~Ee) UTILITY POLE -- -- ~ ~ ¢421 CO-LOCATION i -- CO ~ETE CURB S 25°52'30"' W 168.17' ~J~ PMo 05/11/10 MIDDLE 0 ROAD (NORTH ROAD) ZONIN~ INFORMATION O LILCO UTILITY POLE ELEC. cONOUIT (MARK-OUT) PROPOSED HETRO PCS EQUIPHENT CABINET5 (TTP. OF 4) NOUNTED ON PRO?OSED STEEL RAIL5 ANCHORED TO NEH 15' x I0' CONCRETE 5LAB IN 18' x 20' FENCED EQUIPHENT GOHPOUND (560 5Q FT LEASE AREA) .( 705.52' ~750' S 25052'30'' W 168.17' MIDDLE 0 20' wtoE) ROAD (C.R.-48) (NORTH ROAD) Ei}PF?.OF'OSED EQUIPt"IENT OFFSETS Ilxl-~ SCALE: I": 40'-¢" 24x56 SCALE: 1":20 -O" O~ 40' 00' 80' DESIGNu GROUP5 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 Lou Moglino, AIAI Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STIRyCTURAL ENGINEER NJ -/~ A113345 I NJ .# GE 36209 . NY # 075384 NY-~028992 1 I CT 22375 PA - # O61412 SEAL metroPCS Wireless for All, sire uccc. ~T* ~o**. OclMPSTSOI4 SITE I NFOP-..MATION ,2.1855 COUNTY' ~OAO 48 CUTC.,HO~UE, N'Y' CO-LOOATION Ph,'fo 05/I 1/10 SHEET = PROPOSED ELECTRIC FROM EXIBTIN¢ METER STACK NEXT TO AUTO BODY SHOP TO NE?4 COMPOUND = PROPOSED 5ROUND RIN¢ (~= PROPOSED TELCO FROM EXIBTING CBC CABINET TO NEW COMPOUND EXISTIN5 CABLE BRID®E BY OTHER9 (TYP) EXISTINS IOO'-O" -- HONOPOLE TO BE HODIFIED ACCORDIN®LY TO 112' HISH T© ACCOMODATE EXISTIN¢ AND PROPOSED LOADINS DRA~IN®5 AND DETAILS ARE PROVIDED BY OTHER5 FOR REFERENCE EXISTIN® CSC CABINET .:XISTINS EQUIPFfENT (BY OTI4ERB) PROPOSED METRO--I =C5 CABLE BRIDCE ROUTED OVER CORNER OF EXISTING T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT AREA SEE DETAIL I/Z-5) 250' GAMMA BECTOR EXISTIN® VERIZON SHELTER /' ~EXISTINS DOUBLE SATE ALPHA SECTOR EXIST/NS NEXTEL SHELTER EXISTIN® EQUIPHENT PROPOSED METRO POS ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, & TOTAL, BTACKED) MOUNTED TO PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXTENBION ON PROPOSED FLUSH MOUNT BRACKETS (SEE DETAIL B/Z-4) BETA SECTOR EXISTINS EQUI?N'ENT (BY OTPERS) - EXiSTIN® UTILITIES --E×ISTINS 4'-0" CATE / / ,NFOR*AT,ON SEE DETA,L PROPOBED METRO PCB E*UVMENT C^B,NETS PROPOSED METRO PCS UNDER,ROUND) UTILITY CONDUIT ROUTED FROI'4 EXISTING METER STACK }P,AF TIAL SITE PLAN Ilxl~ SCALE: I": 1®'-®" 24x5~ SCALE. I'=~'-¢" PROPOSED HETRO PCB GP5 ANTENNA MOUNTED TO CABLE BRIDBE SUPPORT POST (BEE DETAIL 2/Z-5) EXISTIN® EQU (DY OTHERS) EXISTINEu 6'-d FENCE ~ITH BARBED ,dIRE IL Jk 116'-O" CONCRETE $LAD/HC's .-'x PROPOBED METRO PC.B PTO CABINET BECURED TO PROPOSED CONCRETE BLAB ON UNIBTRUT FRAME MOUNTED TO CALVANIZED POSTS PROPOSED METRO PCB DUAL LIGHT WITH MANUAL TIHER · )(,~ )( )( \ \ 20'-O"COMPOUND )( )( )( ) .?~ PROPOSED METRO PCS ..,¢ &'-O" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE P41TH BARBED ~IIRE ¢ PRIVACY BLATS EQUIPMENT PLAN Ilxl'~ SCALE, I/4" = I'-¢" 24x56 $OALE. I/2"=1'-0" PROPOSED HETRO PCS GP$ ANTENNA MOUNTED TO CABLE DRIDCE SUPPORT POST PROPO$ED METRO PCS COAXIAL CABLES ROUTED ALONG NE!d CABLE BRID~E TO EXIBTIN® MONOPOLE EQUIPMENT CABINETS (TYP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO NEA CONCRETE BLAB PROPOSED METRO PCS 15'-O"xlC'-O"CONCRETE 5LAB PROPOSED 15'-0" x 20'-0" EQUIPMENT COMPOUND EXPANSION PROPOSED 4'-O" ,dlDE GATE ,/ /--PROPOBED METRO PC5 UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONDUIT FROM METER PROPOSED METRO PC5 UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CONDUIT FROM EXISTING 030 TO PROPOBED PTG CABINET DESIGN'O GROUP5 ARCHITECTUR ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 LouMog~no, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-¢AI13345 NY-~ 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - # GE 36209 NY - # 075384 CT - ¢ 22375 PA - # 061412 0S/04/10 SSUED FOR FILIN5 SEAL Wireless for All. SITE I NFOB~-MATI ON COUNTY ~OA~ ,CS ~-~,UTCHO~UIE, NY ~UF= F-OLt~--. DESIGN TY'PE: CO-LOCATION SHEET TITLE PAF~.TI AL DATE. O5/11/IO PLAN PLAN SHEET NUME~E P-. P-.EV. C, NOTE: I TOWER IS OVERSTRESSED AND REQUIRES MODIPICATIONS¢ PLEASE REFERENCE THE LATEST STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION REPORT COMPLETED BY CPS ASSOCIATES, DATED MARCH 8, 2010 FOR DETAILS ON THE REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS. ALL STRUCTURAL iqODIFICATIONS MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO INSTALLING ANY ADDITIONAL CABLES, ANTENNAS OR MOUNTS TO THE EXISTIN6 TOWER AND THE PROPOSED EXTENSION· NOTS NOT ALL EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. TOP OF TOWER 21.1E" DIA. PROPOSED METRO PCS ANTENNAS ('WP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, & TOTAL, STACKED) MOUNTED TO PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXTENSION ON PROPOSED FLUSH MOUNT BRACKETS PROPOSED 12'MONOPOLE EXTENSION TO BE INSTALLED BY METRO PCS, SEE D~WlNG5 BY GPD ASSOCIATES, SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER EXISTIN® ANTENNAS (BY OTHERS) (TYPICAL) PROPOSED METRO PCS COAXIAL CABLES ROUTED UP OUTSIDE OF MONOPOLE TO ANTENNAS '%, EXISTING IO0'-O" HONOPOLE TO MODIFIED AGCORDINGJ.Y TO 112' TO ACCOMODATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOAEPlN® BRA,dINGS AND DETAILS ARE PROVIDED BY OTHERS FOR REFERENOE TOP OF PROPOSED CPS ANTEN_NA_ I1%"+ ABOVE GRADE TOP OF PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE q'-O"± ABOVE GRADE TOP OF PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINETS q'-2"~ ABOVE GRADE BASE OF TOWER I I 38" DIA. j~ __ ~'~ _ ~ PROPOSED METRO PCS UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONDUIT ROUTED FROM EXISTING METER STACK TO PTC CABINET (SEE ELECTRICAL DRA,,liNG5 FOR DETAILS) TOP OF PROP. METRO PC5 ANTENNAS IID'-q"~ ABOVE GRADE CENTER OF PROP. HETRO PC5 ANTENNA5 ~ TOP OP PR~O~OSED MONOPOLE EXTENSION~I~_ 112'-0"± ABOVE GRADE CENTER OF PROP. METRO PCS ANTENNASF~ [0~'4"±~09E GRADE TOP OF EXISTIN® MQNOP'OLE I00'-0"-- ADO',/--. GRADE OENTER OF EXISTING ANTENNAS qO'-O"± ABOVE GRADE CENTER OF E.×ISTIN& ANTENNAS 80'-0"± ADO\/__. ®RASE CENTER OF EXISTIN® ANTENNAS -~O'-O"± ABOVE GRAPE PR(OPOSED METRO PCS PTC CABINET MOUNTED TO UNISTRUT · FP~AME ON GALVANIZED POST5 Wl-rH LIGHT ABOVE PI~OPOSED HETRO PCS CPS UNIT MOUNTED TO CABLE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST P~,OPOSED METRO PCS EQUIPPiENT CABINETS ('WP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO NEW 13' x CONCRETE SLAB IN 18' X 20' FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND EXPANSION (~60 SQ ~P~,OPOSED METRO PCS COAXIAL CABLES ROUTED ALONG NEW CABLE BRIDGE TO EXISTING MONOPOLE ~PROPOSED METRO PCS HIGH CHAIN LINK PENCE WITH BARBED WlRE AND PRIVACY SLATS APPROXIMATE GRADE ELEV,ATION SCALE: 3/4"=P-¢" (llxlq) SCALE I I/2"=1'-0" (22x64) 250' GAMMA SECTOR 40' ALPHA SECTOR 5 ANTENNA O IENTATION PLAN SCALE: 5/4"=r-¢" (llxlq) SCALE: I I?O":1'-©'' (22x54) PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA: KATHREIN MODEL NO. 866-1¢5¢4 Dimensions 4'-& I/4" I~,idl:h 6 r/4" ~" h Depth 2 I/2" FRONT VIELU SlDE VIEU G ANTENNA SPECIF[O ,TiONS SCALE' 1/2"=1'-¢" ell×lq? SSAL~, I"=1'-©" (~×~,_L) PROPOSED vALMONT TRI-SECTOR CHAIN MOUNT KIT APPROVED EQUAL,) 26/¢" O. P. ANTENNA MOUNIN~ PIPE PROPOSED METRO PC5 ANTENNA ('WP OF I PER SECTOR, S TOTAL) MOUNTED OUTSIDE EXISTING POLE (SEE S/Z-4 FOR ANTENNA MODEL DIMENSIONS) DESIGNu GROUP z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 /ouMogBno, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-#AI13345 NY-# 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - # GE 36209 NY - ~3 075384 CT - ~ 22375 PA - # 061412 05/04/IC ISSUED FOR PILIN® 05/2b/E UPDATED PER ATTORNEY COHHFNfS O5?II/Z ISSUED AS ?RILIMINARY ~E¥1SION ~ATE DESCPqPTION SEAL metroPCSI Wireless for All. m* ~o**. OqN1PSTSOI4 SITE COUNTY P-.OAZ) 48 C. UTOHO~LJE, NY' ~UFFOLK CO-LOCATION Ph"fo 05/11/10 MONOF~OLI= ELEVATI ON ~ 'i---~ T~-T-.~''. I ~ X- 4,- ~EV. PROPOSFD METRO PC5 OPE UNIT MOUNTED ON CABLE BRIDGE CABLE BRIDGE ASSEMBLY OR APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDE SUPPORT POST5 @ SuO"ON CENTER MAXlHUM COAXIAL CABLE5 ROUTED ALONG CABLE BRIDGE ORATING ON TRAPEZE HANGERS S I/2"¢ SCHEDULE 40 POST, AT S'-O" MAXIMU"4 ON CENTER EXISTING SOIL 1'-4" DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING, USE e"XS"xY2" BASE PLATE !~ITH ?2" PlA. ANCHOR5 FOP-, MOUNTINO TO 5LAB PROPOSED 6" THICK LAYER 3/4" PlA, CRUSHED 5TONE BASE )OAE LE tB IDGE DETAIL I/4"= I'-O" (11×1'1) I/2"=1'-©" (22xB4.) ss oR OALV. P,PE I-I/4"¢ sch. 40 x 15" LO. MIN~, (~22) PLATE I/4 x 4-1/4 x 10-1/4" LC. STD. U-BOLT FOR 2"¢ PIPE H/DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND HASHER, CALM, STD. U-BOLT FOR 2"~ PIPE ~ DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND I~SHER, GALV. (SEE NOTE /--PROPOSED /-/ OPE UNIT MOUNTING ~ ~TILT HOLES FOR BRACKET . PLATE ',"':!Ir ~.' iADJUSTMENT PROPOSED~- MOUNTINO MAST GROUND BAR SC-~,/E, I"=1'-o" (22xB4) PROPOSED S" THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE EL.AB P, IITH 2 LAYER5 OF OxO-5/S P, IELDED HIRE FABRIC.. SEE PLAN5 FOR PAD 51ZE (TOP TO BE LIOHTLY B~USHED) PROPOSED CHAMFERED BPOE % APPROX. FINISH GRADE 4" THICK LAYER OF S/4" DIA. CRUSHED STONE BASE EXISTINO UNDISTURBED VIRGIN 50IL OONC. P-.ETE DETAIL SCALE: 3/4"=1'-¢" (Il×iq) SCALE: I 1,2 =1-0 (22x34) (2) PROPOSED LITNONIA 5¢¢UJ LAMP MODEL "fl'QB 566 120 LPI PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINETS (2 EQUIPi'dENT ,~ 2 BATTERY CABINETS) ON STEEL ~RAME MOUNTED TO CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED METRO PCS FTC CABINET ON UNISTRUT FRAME MOUNTED TO GALVANIZED POST P, IlTH LIOHT ABOVE PROPOSED STEEL FRAME PROPOSEO CONCRETE SLAB ~EE DETAIL 2~-S) APPROXIMATE ORADE %.. EQL~IPNENT CABINET LB®END PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET H Z-II 3/8" X O S'-I IlS/lO" X H 6'-S II/I0" PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET H 2'-II S18" X P S'-I lB/ID" X H 6'-S II/iS" PROPOSED BATTERY' CABINET H 2'-4 q/ID" X P 2'-4 S/4" X H 5'-q S/lO" PROPOSED BATTERY CABINET P,I 2'-4 q/lO" X D 2'-4 3/4" X H 5'-q S/lO" NOTE: J. SION SHALL BE HOUNTED ON EXTERIOR 51DE OF FACILIT'f DOOR. 2. MOUNTINO HEIOHT TO BE 5~-0" ABOVE 5ILL TO CENTERLINE OF SIGN. 1'-5 S/4" 0 metroPCS Site NY7314 Network Operation Center 24/7 .,cceae line-1-866-672-6727 ~-~RED BACKOROUND RADIO FREQUENCY ANTENASi AT THIS SITE ~ PLEASE EXERCISE OAUTIOIN AROUND ANTENNAS DO NOT STAND~ IN FRONT OF ANTENNAS ,.o~ o UV-RESISTANCE PLASTIC HHITE LETTER5 ~ ORAPHICS HNITE BACKOROUND BLACK LEI I ERS )TYF ICAL EQLJIPMENT ELE// ,TION SCALE, I/4"= I'-®" SO,ALE t/2"=l'-©" (22x34) DESIGNu GROUP5 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 LouMoglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-CAI13345 NY-¢ 028992-1 I Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - ~ GE 36209 NY -/J 075384 CT - # 22375 PA - ¢4 061412 05125/IC SEAL metroPCS Wireless for All. s,z* ~o** N"P7514 ~m ~o**. Oqi'flPSTSOI4 SITE 21855 OOUNTY' ~OA~ 48 CUIT~,HO~UE, NY ~U F=F= OL t~--- COUNTY' DESIGN T'fPE: CO-LOOATI ON P-.Jo Pi, do O5/I I/IO SHEET TITLE ~45~U I f:>N1~NT E:~ETAILS SHEET NUMtZE~ t~.EX/. RF ElqGINEER ---- -- GROUP5 CON~[ I -- -- P. O. BOX 3 Wi ',.-,.-ss ;>r, JI / HAZLET, NEWJERSEY07730 I I ~ TEL: 732.888.6210 I I F~: 732.847.4335 ~ ~5 ~ ~1~ ~ ~ ~ / Ecu Mog~no, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. = , , f- ~CHITECT STRUCTU~ ENGI~ER NJ - ~ A113345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 ~ 075384 : ~ ~ ,~ A, : CT-~22375 PA - ~ 061412 .... ' ' ~" .... ' .......... ' .......... I SITE ADD~ESS 2 855 wOUNTW ROAD 48 ': ~ : : '**: :* '*'***~ ',¢* ' ,,,;: ';: ¢ ,: ,;* *';~: , , :; :mq ~ '", ::" ' '" 'i i OUTwHO~UE N% Hq~5 SEAL .............................. .... [ HErOHT:, 2 / A L ,, ..... ,., ,: : "',., ' , " ., . ' ' '~,~" , ........... , . :, ', ~ROUN~ ELEVAT ON, ~ +/- AMSL (NAVD 88) ~ .......... ~":~ ............ ~ .... , , ~"~,;' , ', ~, ...... ;~ , ()e 2-o,/- , ()~ ce-5 ,;,&~ASEC OR 250 I oUZcT ...,,, ~:,...~: , ....~.......,.,. / .:,, .. ~.: , ....~ ; . Wireless for All. ..... , .... r ..... 10532 " ~OALE. NT~ 1200 M, KOA~THUR ~ MAHNAH, NJ T-I TITLE SHEET~ ~CTION TO DE IN ACCORDANCE UITH THE FOLLOBiN~ CODE$ ~] ~ P~OPE~TV O~NER A~THU~ dUNCE S{T~ INFORMATION GN-I OENERAL NOTESI5TANDA~5 A$ APPLICABLE: } ' 415 MOULTON HILL * ' ~'~E =~AN ] ~ / LYNAN, NH ~--I WII I~ ] ~E~ YO~ 5T~ ~UILD ~ CODE / A-2 EQUIPNgNT ~LAN [ -ALL LOCAL CODE~ ~ 21~5 A-3 ELEVATION, GA~L~ ~OUTIN~ D~TAIL5 I~SATIO~A~JS~5_O~ ........... ~O~T~ COSTA~T: A~THU~ JUNS~ - OO~-OSO-O~O2 ~UT~HOOU~, N~ I Iq~5 A-4 UTILITY FRAHE ELEVATIONS ~ OPS M ~ESIGN TYPE: ' OUNT ~TAILS [ ~E~TION~h ~$ GODE [ UTILITY OONTAOT: ES I EQUIPMENT SPECIFIOATIONS/ - ~ ~IONAL ~E$1DENTIAL CO~E / ~A~ ~F-I ~F INFOrmATiON STEEL ANTENNA TOUE~$ AN~ $~PO~TINQ $T~OT~E$ MINIMUM/A~LIOAN~: ~ET~O ~06 NE~ ~O~K, E-I RLEOT~IOA~ NOTES * INFO~ATION B~ IN CONJBNGTION UITN e.q~ INCNE$ OF ~A~JAL ICE AND Se M~LE$ ~ SK~L. IN~ ~IV~ E-2 ELEOTRIOAL PLAN ~ I ~ SH~T TIT~ ~-~ ~mn~l~ DETAILS ) ~%'~ ~EFO~E Y:OU PI5 :-4 ~OUND N~ ~ETAIL~ ~',(~lx INNYC&I , ~ I ~ I ~ / CONSTRUCTION FRANK SAN PILIPPO SHEET NUMBE~ ~EV / ~ANAOER: ~ SAC SUPErVISOr: JEFP HOMI~E I. ALL CONSTRUCTION, LABOR AND MATER[AL SHALL COMPLY k~ITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE ~UILDIN~ COE~ES, ORDINANCES AND ACCORDANCE Y41TH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. ALL SLJP-,~ACES CONTAMINATION SHALL DE REMOVED PRIOR TO PAINTIN® TO THE ~ULE~ AN~ ~ULATION~ OF ALL A~NOI~D HAMIN~ JUriSdiCTION. TH~ N[~ ~U~PAOE~. ALL ~ALVANIZ~ ~U~FAOE~ ~HALL HAV~ ONE COAT O~ ~[~NADON~ ~ONDIN~ A~ENT, ~HIL~ ~TILL ~ET A~L~ ONE COAT OF 6H~IN ~ILLIA~6 PLAT ~AT~X ~AINT, LIT ~ TH~N A ~EOON~ OOAT OF PLAT LATEX ~A~NT. 2. TH~ OONT~AOTO~ HU~T VISIT THE ~IT~ AN~ DE ~ON~tDLE ~O~ VE~I~IN~ ALL ~I~EN~ION~ AN~ OON~ITION~. ANY , ARCHITECTURE ASENOIE5 HAVIN¢ JURIS~IOTION. 2I. ~ATERIAL5 AND OONDITION5 NOT FADRIOATE~ OOR~EOTL~, ~AMA~E~ O~ NON-OONFORMINO 5HALL DE REPORTE~ TO ~ N G I N E E R I N G 4. THE OONT~AOTO~ 5HALL P~OWI~E ALL ITEH50~ LABOR AND MATERIALS, ~HETHE~ OR NOT ~PEOINIOALLY INDIOATED, IF GON~T~UOTION ~ANA~E~, A/E AN~ O~NER P~lO~ TO ANW OOR~EOTIVE AOTtON. ALL AOTION5 ~E~UIRE5 APPROVAL RE~UI~ED TO OOMPLETE THE INSTALLATION. UNPEg. HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 5. THE GONT~ACTO~ SHALL DE RESPONSIBLE NO~ ADEQUATE DRAOIN¢ AND PROTEOTIN¢ OF ALL NOOK OURIN~ OONST~UOTION 22. GONT~AGTO~ MUST INSTALL ~ NARNIN¢ SIGNS AT ALL ENTR~ POINTS TO EQUiPmENT A~EAS. THESE A~E TO INOLUOE, BUT TEE: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 2 1 0 TO AVOID DAHASE, COLLAPSE, DISTORTION, NISALISNHENT, VUlPINe ROOFIN¢ SUA~ANTEES AND NARRANTIES, ETD. P~OTEOTION NOT. L,I~/TEO TO, INTE~IO~ FADES OF ROOF ACCESS DOORS / HATOHES. AND EXTERIO~ FADES AT OOHPOUND AOOESS 5ATES [~: 7 3 2.8 4 7.4 3 3 5 RESTORED TO OOHPLETE ~ATER TISHTNESS ~ITH THE APPROVEO HATER~AL AND AS PRE-APPROVED ~Y THE OHNE~ IN ~ITiN¢. FOUNDATIONS I. S~IL' HAS AN ASSUMED SEA,INS OAPAOIW OF 2,500 POUNDS PER S~UARE ~OO'T. ESTIMATE~ BOTTOM OF FOOTIN~ LOU Mogl o, AM Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STRUCTU~L ENGINEER 0. ALL MATERIALS SHALL DE INSTALLED AS PER THE MANUFAOTURER5 5PEOIFIOATIONS. ELEVATION5 A~E SHOHN ON FOUNDATION PLAN. THESE ELEVATION5 SHALL DE ADJUSTED TO THE AOTUAL LEVEL5 OF APPROVED BEA~IN~ STRATA FOUND UPON EXCAVATION. ANY UNUSUAL OONDITION¢ 5HALL DE DALI_ED TO THE A113MS NJ- GE 36209 - ¢ 075384 q. ~O NOT 5GALE ~A~IN~. ATTENTION OF TH~ A~OHITEOT/EN~INEE~. ~' ¢ 028992-1 CT-~ 22375 ~. THE GONT~AOTO~ ~HALL DEA~ ~ULL ~ESPON~IDILI~ FO~ THE MEAN~ AND NETHOP5 OF OONST~UOTIN~ THE ~O~K ~HO~N ON ' ~' PA-¢ 061412 TH~E PLAN~. A~L NOOK PE~FO~ME~ 5HALL DE ~ONE IN A ~OOD NO~KMAN¢HIP MANNE~ TO THE 5ATISFAOTION O~ THE ONNE~. 2. NO DAOK PILLIN~ O~ ~OUN~ATION NALL5 5HALL DE ~ONE UNTIL CLAD ON ~OUN~ I~ IN PLAOE AN~ GONORETE HA5 ~AUTIONA~ Z~O~T~ TO ~OTE~T THE PEN ~UI~M~NT ~U~IN~ THI~ INSTALLATION AN~ ~ET. THE OONTRAOTO~ 5HALL ALL , / mOOTINg5 TENANT'5 TO THE DUILDIN~ THE 51TE. -TH~ ~UIL~IN~'~ ~1~ 5A~T~ O~ ~HALL NOT O~AT~ AN~ ~1~ HAZArd5. -TH~ 5HALL NOT B~ AN~ O~SATION O~ N0155 OUTSI~ TH5 NO~AL HOU~ O~ ~ A~ TO ~ PH, ~NL~5~ OTH~IS~ A~ ~. ~AX~MU~ 5LOP5 ~ST~5~N ~OTTOH O~ A~JAO~NT ~OOTIN~S ~HALL ~ ON~ (I) M~TIOAL TO (~) HORIZONTAL. ALL FOUNDATION ~ALL5 5HALL BE A~E~UATEL% DRAOE~ TO ~ITHSTAND BAC~ PILLINg, EARTH PRESSURE, AND UPON ~ITH THE -THE DULLDIN~'5 5EGU~IT~ 5HALL DE MAINTAINED IN O~DER TO P~EVENT ANY UNAUTHO~IZE~ PERSONS F~OM ENTERIN~ THE OONST~U~TION LOA~5 UNTIL ALL E~UIPMENT A~E INSTALLED P~R THE OONSTRUOTliON D~ANIN~5. 01/22/10 "'" ' -THE DUILDIN¢'S UTILIT~'S (5LEOTRIGiTY, ~A5, ~ATER AND OTHER UTILI~'S) SHALL NOT DE ~NTE~UPTE~ OU~IN~ THIS I. OONGRETE HAS BEEN OESISNE~ AND SHALL DE OONSTRUOTEP IN AOOOROANOE ~ITH ~E~UIREHENT5 OF THE AHERIOAN APPLIOATION ~ INSTALLATION. -ALL MASON~ PENETRATIONS SHALL DE OONE US~N~ ~OTARY ACTION ONLY (NO HAMME~IN~ AOTION).. CONO~ET5 INSTITUTE (ACl) DUIL~IN~ CODE FO~ ~EINFO~OEO CONCRETE, LATEST AMENOM~NT5. DA~RIE~ SEALANT. MAINTAIN THE FI~5 ~ATIN¢ OF ALL PENETRATED SU~FAOE5. 2. TH5 MATEriAL SHALL OONPO~N TO THE FOLLO~IN¢ STANDARDS AND ~E~UIREMENTS (LATEST EDITIONS): PO~TLANO DEMENT ASTM OI50 SEAL q. THE CONT~AOTO~ SHALL, AT ALL TIMES, ~EEP THE P~EMISE5 F~EE FROM ACCUMULATION O~ ~ASTE,, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL READY HIX CONCRETE ASTH Cq4 g ACI-DOI AND RUBBISH. UPON OoMPLETION, ALL ~EB~IS SHALL DE AEHOVED AN~ THE PREHISES LEFT IN A "DR~OOM CLEAN" OONDITION. ~ONO~TE A55RESATE ASTM IO. THE OONTRAOTO~ 5HALL COORDINATE ALL SPECIAL OONSIDE~ATION50~ THE OONSTRUOTLON (EX. 'NOl¢~ OPERATIONS, D. PO~ND CEMENT 5HALL BE TYPE IA. INTErrUPTIONS O~ ANY MECHANLOAL AN~/OR ELEOTRIOAL 5E~VIOES, MATERIAL DELIVERIES AN~/O~ 5TOWAGE) ~ITH THE ~O~ O~ A5 ~EQUI~ED DY THE OF ~ INCHES, AND A MAXIMUM O~ 5 INGHES. ii. THE OONT~AOTO~ 5HAL~ PATCH ~EPAI~ BXIST[N~ LOOAL UTILITY'5 REqUIrEMENTS. W. MINIMUM A~E~ATE 5lEE 5HALL DE D/4" INOH. FOR ALL CONCRETE 5HALL ~E B" HININUH ANP 5" HAXINUH Wireless for All. ~4. THESE DOCUMENTS A~E IN OOMPLIANCE ~ ALL OONSTRUOTION TO DE IN ACCORDANCE ~ITH THE ~OILLO~LN~ CODE5 ~ STANDARDS, LATEST EDITION5 A5 APPLIOABLE: q OONO~ETE MIX SHALL DE IN AOOOR~ANOE ~ITH A.O.I. DOPE. 5 8~UNE DRIVE - 2¢¢3 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE - 2¢¢3 tNTE~ATIONAL ENE~OY CONSERVATION CODE IO. OONTRAOTOA 5HALL OOO~DINATE ALL O~ THE ~EOUI~EMENT5 P~IO~ TO POU~IN~ OONO~ETE TO AOOOMMO~ATE HA~HORNE~ NY ~0~ - 2¢¢5 INTERNATIONAL EXISTINO ~ILDINO CODE ANY AND ALL PENETRATION5 PO~ A~OHITEOTU~AL, 5T~UOTURAL, MEOHANIOAL ~ ELEOT¢IOAL ~RA~IN~5. -2¢¢3 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE sl~E Jo=~:NYT314 -2¢¢3 INTE~ATIONAL FdEL ~A5 CODE lt. ALL REINPOROIN¢ DA~5 SHALL BE DEFORHED BARS DE NE~ BILLET STEEL OONP<O~M/N~ TO ASTM SPED AAIS, - 200* INTE~ATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 00, OOLD ~RA~N ~IRE FOR ~ELDED ~IRE MESH 5HALL 6ONFO~H TO R~QU~REMENT5 OF "SPED5 PO~ 6OL~ ~RA~N - 2¢¢3 INTE~ATIONAL PLUM~[N~ CODE OR CONCRETE .REiNFOrCEMENT" (ASTM A82-~O), OR "SPED ~OR NELPE~ STEEL ~I~E FABriC FO~ CONO~ETE OlT Eh[FORMATION -2¢¢3 INTE~ATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE ~EINFO~CEMENT, (ASTM AI85-WO). ~EIN~OROIN¢ 5HALL DE 5EOU~ELY TIED TO P~EVENT DISLOOATION AND PE~ THE - 2¢¢3 INTE~ATIONAL ~ESIDENTIAL CODE DETAJLiN~ MANUAL. -TIA-222-Q 5TANDA~5 "STRUCTURAL STANDARD5 FOR STEEL ANTENNA TO'ER5 AND 5~pPORTINQ 5TRaCTOr5" NININ~N BASIC ~IND SPEED OF 12¢ NILES/ NO'R5 (5¢ NILE5/NO~R IN CONJUNCTION ~iTN ¢.15 INCHES ~ ~ADIAL ICE AND ~¢ NILE5/NOIR BITHO~T ICE). 12. ALL BAR5 HAR~ED OONTINUOU5 (OONT.) 5HALL BE LAPPED 40 X BAR DIAMETER AT 5PLICE5 AN~ GUNNER5 AND 15. ALL PROPOSED 5T~UOTU~AL STEEL SHALL ~E PAD~iOATE~ AND EREOTE~ IN AOGO~DANGE ~ITH AlSO OODE ANP ASTM HOOKEP AT NON-CONTINUOUS ENDS. LAP TOP DA~5 AT OENT5~ BETWEEN 5UPPO~T5 ANP LAP CONTINUOUS BOTTOM 5PEOIPIGATIONS, LATEST EDITION. -AI~E PLANTE 5EOTJON5 5HALL OONPORN TO ASTH A-~2 ID. ALL OONSTRUOTION JOINTS 5HALL BE THO~OU~HL~ OLEANE~, ~E~ED AND SLUSHED ~ITH OENENT ~ROUT JUST -NISO. eTE5L ¢HALL CONPO~N TO AST~ ANT-~ DEPOSE PLAOIN~ NEA OONO~ETS. THE CONCRETE ANP HASON~M OONT~AOTOR 5HALL INSTALL (OR ¢IVE OTHER ~I~N -ALL STEEL PIPE5 5HALL OONFORN TO TO ASTH ANT-501 OR ANT-53, 5~APE B. -OONNEOT[ON5 5HALL ~AP~ USIN5 5PEOIFIEP ~ELD5 AND ~ELDIN~. ELEOTRODE5 E-ffOXX O~ 5PEOI~IE~ HIgH 5T~ENCTH DOLT5 TRA~E5 A~PL50PPORTUNIT~ TO INSTALL) ALL ANCHOR BOLTS, PLAT~5, 5LOTS, OHA¢ES, NAILe~5, INDERTS, SLEEVE5, AN~ -BE HOT ~IPPEP ~ALVANIZED AFTE~ PAB~IOATION (ONLY EXPOSED TO HOISTU~E APPLIOATIONS) PE~ ASTH A-12~. ALL INTERIOR FADE5 OF ~ALL5 (1'9, EXTE~IO~ FADE5 OF ~ALL5 (I-I/2"), 5LAB TOP AND ]BOTTOM BA~5 (~/4"), BEA~5 (I-I/2"), ~ITH T~O (2) 6OAT5 OF ZRO OOLP ~ALVANIZlN~ OOHPOUND ~ANUFAOTU~ED BY ARO OHEHIOAL P~O~UCTS. 15. ~HE~EVE~ OONCRETE 5U~FAOE5 A~UT O~ ARE VENEERED ~ITH MASON~, P~OV'IDE VERTIOAL ~OVETAIL INSE~T5 SHEET TITLE -ALL PIPE 51ZEE INPlOATED HE~EIN A~E NOHINAL PlA~ETE~ (INSIDE ~IAHETER). FOR ~ASONR~ ANCHOr5 SPADED AT 2'-0" O.O. IT ALL NE~ ANTENNA APPLIOATION5 HOUNTEP TO EXTE~IO~ ~ALL~ 5HALL BE SEALED AT THE TOP AN~ 5IDES ~ITH DO~ ~N~,~ OORNIN~ OLEA~ 51LICONE SEALANT O~ APPROVED EQUAL. THE SILICONE APPLIOAT/ON5 5HALL BE TOOLED TO MAINTAIN A 10. THE CONT~AOTOR 5HALL APPLY A NON-SLIP B~OOM FINISH IMMEDIATEL~ A~TERL THE T~O~EL ~INISHIN~ PHASE. FINISHED APPEA~ANOE. I~. THE OONTRAGTO~ 5HALL TAKE ALL NEOE55A~Y PRECAUTION5 IN O~DE~ TO PROTSOT THE OONCRETE 18. ~HE~E INPIOATED ON THE PLAN5 THE OONT~AOTO~ 5HALL PAINT ALL NE~ ANTENNAS, SHROUD AN~ ~ELATE~ MOUNTIN~ PREMATURE OU~IN~ A5 5DON A5 THE PO~H5 A~E REHOVED, ESPEOIALLY DU~IN~ TtHE PI~ST 24 HOURS. SHEET NU~DER REk/. HA~A~E TO MATOH THE EXlSTIN~ A~JACENT 5U~FAOES. ALL PAINT 5HALL BE 5HE~IN ~ILLIAN50~ APP~OVE~ EQLJAL. THE FiLL OONT~AOTO~ 5HALL NOT USE A METAL ~ASEP PAINT ON THE ANTENNAS. ANTENNA5 5HALL HAVE ON~ P~IME~ OOAT DP POLANE I. ALL FiLL UNDER OONORETE 5LAB5 TO BE q5% OOMPAOTE~ EARTH, ~ELL TAMPE~ AND 4" OOMPAOTED 2.8 PLUS PIL DOIHq5 P~IME~ IN ACCO~DANO5 ~ITH HANUFAOTU~E~'5 INST~UOTIONS AND THEN APPLY ONE TOP COAT IN 5~AVEL. ALL BACK FILL MATERIAL 5HALL BE P~EE OF ANY O~ANIO MATTER. i , BOUNDARY INFORHATION IS TAKEN FROH THE FOLLO!,tlN& ,; PROPOSED METRO POS EQUIPMENT (..,ABINETS - ~ RAILS ANOHORED TO NEH OONORETE 5LAB IN ~ ~ ~ 18' x 20' COHPOUND (208 5~ FT LEASE TAX LOT ¢17.5 / ~ c~ / 9~_ E N G I N E E R I N G _ 51TE HEASURHENT5 TAKEN BY THE HTN 142,5' sI,E YA~ "'A~ N/O/F TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DESICN 6ROUP lNG. AT SITE VISIT ON 04.11.Oq (EXIBTINe POLE TO/ ~° ~ / m ~ ~ ~ 8g// ~ P.O. BOX3 ~o~w u,~) ~./~,' HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 N. ~ . ~ TEL: 732.888.6210 ~ . ,~ / ~ ~~~ ~ ~ CT-~22375 ~ o < 8 U T ' dAB/NET5 TO ,~ ~ ~ ~l ~ PROPE*WLINE) ~ EDgE CF ~SP~[~l~~ [ ~A S P H A L T P A R K I N G ~ ~ .3 ~ 1 STY FRAME ~ o ~/ll I~ ROOF OVER ~ ' ~ [~/o~ bi ~ -- HA~HORNE, NYI0532 s~ ~ a ~ Iq l/~ '~ ~1 I~ ~ N/0/F CHRISTOPHER MOHR MTM~O**. u 0 C ' ~ ~ ' - o ~ ~ESI~N TYPE. UTILITY POLE D ~ UTILITY POLE "-2o OO-LOOATION ~ ~ ~ ~~*-- ~ 168.17' c~***-oo=) MIDDLE(120' WIDE)ROAD S***T TITLE (NORTH ROAD) SHEET NU~BE~ LINI~ SGALE: = - 24xD6 SGALE: I"=&O'-O" pOS EDELECTRICFROME×I SHOP TO NEH COMPOUND ®:PROPOSED*ROUND RIN*D E S I G N G= PROPOSED TELCO FROM EXISTIN* CSC CABINET TO NE!~ COMPOUND (BY OTbI~S~ ", ARCHITECTURE N ENGINEERING ~D nl~ "~ HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 '~ '~ " '~ .. TEL: 732.888.6210 }~ X Lou Mog~no, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. : -- .. N X ARCHITECT STRUCTU~L ENGI~ER .) '~ "X ~ ~ - NJ * ~ A113345 NJ * ~ GE 36209 ~/ x~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ 0289924 ~ ' ~ 075384 ' .. CT * ~ 22375 : ~ x PA - ~ 061412 ~XIST~N~ ~OUBL~ SATE :. ,~ ~ x~ *, es ~ ' *' ~ ~'-0" HICH CHAIN LINK OS/I~/ICI$$U~ ~x ] . ~ EX~STIN~ EQUIPMENT ' ( ~R ~ ~ 1~,_0,, 6ONC~ETE $LA~/~6', ) ~ ~ROPOSED METRO POS / I ~ STACKED) HOUNTEO TO TO CABLE BRIDSE REV ~ATE EXISTIN ~ . ' - ' ~ SUPPORT POST (SEE PROPOSE~ LOADINg. . ~/ ): DETAIL 2/A-4) $EAL ~ETAiL5 ARE ~. ~ ~ / / PROPOSEO HETRO POS FOR REFERENCE : ~, ~% % ~ __._..' DETAILS) ~ ,, COAXIAL CABLE5 ~ ~~ I~ ~ a~ - ' *OUTED ALONS NE~ [~$MENTIN¢ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ EXISTIN~ EQUIPMENT ~ _~ ~ I" ~''%-x. CONSENT OF TH~ ,, Wireless All. _ ........ // : ~, ~ ~ / _ . ~f.q, --~/~ . CABINET ON SUPPORT POSTS NEH 60NCRETE $LAB HA~HORNE, NY 10532 I .~ ~ .; . ,~ ,~ ~ ~~~ ) xN ,, ,, ~ ~ ~OUN~D TO PROPOSE~ SLAB (SEE ;( ($E~ DETAIL [ ~ 2/A-5) / I.N k ~ > I X ~EXISTIN5 4'-0 5ATE " ~ DETAILS I/A-4 ¢ ORAHIN5 ES-2) SITE .OB~. · ,e,es~m M~T*e-- / I X N ~~2 mo*msim Ie'-o"x M=. :o** O<MPST$O~4 c -- ~ ~o~o~ M~r~o ~c~ ~uA~ ~los~ ~ou~% ~ II ~ ~ ii~P~oPosEo METRO PCS :' X LI6HT ~[TH MANUAL TIMER $HITOH X( 20'-O" COMPOUND (~0 OVE~OO~NER F , , , ~ ' L, 5QFTLEASEAREA) SITE INFOrmATION ..... t ' X X ~ ~P5 ANTENNA MOUNTED '* SEE DETAIL 2/A-3) A ~ .... ~ II ~r~l/ O/~ ~/ . , * , x ~ ,u ,,, )< )< ~< >(, >< )< >< )( )( O ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~; II ~ / ~ P~oPos~m 4'-0" HImE OUTOHO~U~, ~Y I I~B5 I ]~~ ~ ~~11~ ~ ~ ~xx//~~'/ 6ATE (SEE DETAIL i/A-q) I ~ ~ ~" ~ 20'-O" OOHPOUND % , / UNDERe~OUND UTILI~~ PROPOSED METRO PCS CO-LOOATI ON ~, , ~ / CONDUIT ~OH METER ......... ~./ ~ X~X,, D*AHINO5 FOR DETAILS) HTs JPe O5/22/Oq ' SHEET TITLE ' P*OPOSEO M~T*O PCS ~UIPM~NT CA~IN~T5 / % 1~ X (~P. OF 4) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO NEA CONCRETE SLAB IN / ~ kN PROPOSED METRO PCS ~ ~ U I ~ ~ ~ N T ~1 A N [8' x 20' OOHPOUND (208 5Q PT LEASE / ~ UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 6ONDUIT F,oM ~XISTIN~ A~A) (5E~ 2/A-2 FO* DETAILS~ / ~ 656 TO P~OPOS~D PT6 / CABINET (SEE ELECTriCAL SHEET NU~E~ REV. PROPOSED ME~O PCS UNDERGROUND UTILI~ / ~ D~AHINSS FOR DETAILS) CONOUIT ROUTEO FROM EXISTI~¢ METER STACK/ (SEE ELEOT~IOAL DRAHIN¢S F,OR DETAILS) Ilxlq SOALE:I"=IO'-O" ] 24x~6 SCALE: 1"=20'-O" tlxlq SOALE:I/4"=I'-O" 24x56 SCALE: I/2"=1'-O" NOTE~ TO!~ER IS OVERSTRESSED AND REQUIRES MODIFICATIONS~ ~.A-~../ ~1 ""~-"<~"~- I"'" ASSEM~L~ O~ APP~OV~O E~UAL. PLEA~ ~E~E~ENCE TH~ LATEST ~T~UCTU~L ANALYSIS ~ I ~--C'I MANUFACTURER5 5PEOIFIOATION5 FOR ~ND 5T*UOTU*AL ~OOIF,CATIO~ ~PO~T COMPLETED BY ~ I~ ~'1 INSTALLATION ~UID~LINE5 D E S I ~ ~ U ~pOA550OIATES, OATEOHA~OHS, 20,OPO*DETA,LSON ~ I ~~l ~ ;:r G R 0 U ANY AODITIONAL CABLES, AN~NNAS OR MOUNTS TO THE ~ ~ ALONG CABLE ~ ¢RATINe ON ~APEZE t~ A R C H I T E C T U R EXISTIN~ TOUR AND THE PROPOSED EXTENSION. ~ ~ ( I E N G I N E E R I N ~ ~ ~ HANGERS (SEE DETAIL ~/A-~) ~ ~ ~T P.O. BOX3 NOTE: ~ ~ ~ ~ -- 3 I/2"¢ SCHEDULE 40 ~Z~E~, NEWJEESE~ 07730 40T ALL EXISTIN6 EQUIPHENT TOP OF PROP. HETRO POS ANTENNAS ~ ~ ~ , POST, AT 8'-0" ~: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 2 ] 0 5HOAN FOR CLARITY. f 113'-q"~ ABOVE ~RADE < P HAXIHUH ON OENTER PROPOSED VALHONT , ~ e ~ o~ ~ F~: 732.847.4335 TOP O~ P~OPOS~D NONOPOLE EXTENSION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ COAXIAL CA~LES ~OUTED UP QA~LE O~ APP~OVEO EQUAL. SEE ~ ~ B~IO~E POST ON VALNONT DOUBLE ~o~ ~o~o, ~ ~o~E W. ~, P.~. ~ ~ ~ 5PECJFIOATION5 FO~ ARCHITECT STRUCTU~LENGINEER ~~ ~~m T-LINEDRAOKETSORAPPROVED INSTALLATION GUIDELINE5 OEN~R OF PROP, METRO PoD AN~NNA5 ~ ~ % ~ _, ~ E~UAL (SEE DETAILS 4 ~ D/A-D) NJ - ~ A113345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 -- IOO'-D"~ABOVE~PE ~ m ~ ~, -- ~-¢028992-1 ~-¢075384 ~ CT - ¢ 22375 ~ ~ ~ C HAN~ER ASSEHBLT OR _ ~ ~, TOP OY ~XISTIN~ ~ONOPOLE ¢~ ~ ~ 3'-0" ON CENTE~ ' P ~ _ . % ~ % ~ APPROVED E~UAL ¢ FL~SH HOUNT B~OKET5 (SEE / IO0'-O"~ ABOVE TO BE INSTALLED BY METRO POS. SEE = = = qo'-o"k A~OVE ORADE % ~ ~¢¢755~545 SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATECOVER =' ¢'~>~ 'X4¢ ~ EXISTINO SOIL PROPOSED OOAXtAL ~ (TYPICAL) 01/22/10 RE-ISlED FOR CONSTRUCTION ~C~ I ' ~,, i,.0,,¢ CONO~ETE FOOUN~ (SEE OETAILS CABLES (~PIOAL) EXISTIN5 ANTENNAS (BY~~ ~ CENTER OF EXISTING ANTENNAS (~~[~,' ,:~*' ¢~/A-~ FO~ ~OUNTIN5 TO SLAB) SEOURED TO HANGER ~ITH OTHERS) (TYPICAL) ~' 80'-0'? ~BOVE 5~ADE ~ ~ ,, STANDARD 5NAP-IN OL~P5 ', '<s<'~ 'J '> ,- PROPOSED O" THICK LA~ER REV. ~ATE ~EVISION ~RA~N " .~ ~ / ~/4" DIA. CRUSHED 5TONE ~ CENTER OF EXISTINO ANTENNA5 I lixl7 5OALE: l/4" = I'-0" ~24xBO 5OALE= I/2" = I'-O" Ilxl7 5CALE: B/4"=l'-O" [=4x=o 5GALE: I I/2"=1'-O" PROPOSEO COAXIAL-"----~ - -~~¢~4o~/ , CABLES (~PIGAL) o, o~ 5EOU~ED TO DOUBLE c PROPOSED OOAXIAL GABLE5 T-LINE BRACKET HITH PROPOSED METIRO P65 PT6 ~ m 5TANDARD 5NAP-IN 6ABLE BR~DSE ~¢~ . ~ ~ DOUBLE T-LINE BRAOKET / OABINET MOUNTED TO UNISTRUT m~~j OLIP5 SUPPORT POSTIII II~ITH STANDARD SNAP-IN OOP~I~HT OF "THE ~T~ P~SleN O~OU¢, PROPOSED METRO PCS OOAXIAL NITH LISHT ABO)VE (SEE DETAILS CABLE BRID~E ~ ~ ~ ~ i OONSENT OP ZH~ C~ATO~ ms ST~IOTLY OABLE5 ROUTED UP OUTSIDE OF ~ I/A-4 ~ ORA~IN;6 ES-2) SUPPORT POST PROPOSED VALMONT ~/A-1) (P~INT TO ~TC~ NONO~OLE) P~OPOS~O N~TI~O PCS ~PS UNIT ~C~ET ~ODEL = Wireless forAll. / MOUNTED TO 6ABLE ~m~ 8021~ o~ / SUPPORT POST ~(SEE DETAIL 2/A-4) / ON CENTER (AS ~ / / / PROPOSED METRO POS E~UIPMENT REQUIRED) ~ OENTER (AS ~E~UIREO) ~ $~l~ ~l~ / / / CABINETS (wP. OF 4) MOUN~o ON HA~HORNE, NY 10532 / / / ANCHORED TO N~ OONORETE 4 B~AOKET PLAN 5 BRAGKET ELEVATION EXISTIN5 I00'-0" HONOPOLE TO BE% /// SLAB IN lB' X 16~' FENOED Ilxl~ SOALE,N.T.5. 24xB8 SOALE, N.T.S. llxl~ SOALE,kT.S. 24xB6 SOALE, N.T.S. ~ODIFIEO ACCORDINGLY TO li2' HIgH ~ / / / COMPOUND (208 s~ FT LEASE ~ uo~: OqMPSTSOI4 TOACOOHODATEEXISTIN*AND ~ / / / AREA) (SEE A-2 FO* DETAIL*) PROPOSED LOADING, ~RA~INOS AND ~ / / /, PROPOSE~ METRO POS COAXIAL SITE INFOrmATION DETAILS A*E P*OVIDE~ BY OTHE*S ' / / / / CABLES ROUTED ALON* FO~ ~EFE~ENOE / / / / CABLE DRIDeE TO EXISTINe/ I/2"¢ ANCHOR 5ET 4 I/4" INTO / / / / HONOPOLE (SEE DETAILS I ~ 2/A-5) / HILTI-HIT HY-150 SYSTEM (SEE ~1~55 OOUNT% ~OAO ~EXISTINO EQUIP~MENT ~ FO~ INSTALLATION PROOEDURE) PROPOSED METRO PCS O'-O" % ~ ~ o ? I/2 ¢HEEP HOLE ~ :¢ 8"xS"xl/2" BASE PLATE , _~ HIOH CHAIN LINK FENOE ~ITH .. ~. i' - 8 x8 xl/2 BASE PLATE ~-~ Zi~, ~ o ~ ~ ~ OD-LOCATION ~ BA~EO XI~E (SEE OETA,L m/A-,) , .~': '" C- PROPOSED oONORETE SLAB ~ ~ PROPOSED S I/2"m SCHEDULE 40 ' J~(m~gB~ g~ ' 4 L, / ' , (SEE DETAIL B/A-5) ~ ~ % - ~ OABLE BRIDGE ~PPORT POST DRA~N BY: CHECKED BT, DATE, Nz ' , x / x< <v ' . ] ELEVATION, CABLE OUTIN /x//x~m/,/,</zx/,/,N<,xx4 x Zx%/EN/xN'/,/' ' x I~",%- ', I/2 ¢ ANCHOR BET 4 I/4 INTO ~ CABLE PO~T DETAILS UTILITY OONOUIT ROUTED FROM EXISTINe ' '-->:'~' HILTI-HIT HY-I50 SYSTEM (SEE ME~R 5TAOK TO FTC OABINET (SEE ~ ~" 8" NANUFAOTURER'5 ELEOTRIOAL DRANIN¢5 FOR DETAILS) MIN. FOR INSTALLATION PROCEDURE) SHEET NUNDE~ REV (TYPIOAL OF 4 PER PLATE) I. ALL MATERIAL TO BE HOT-DIPPED ~ALVANIZED 2. SECURE EQUIPMENT TO UNISTRUT BRACKET5 UTILIZIN~ UNISTRUT CHANNEL NUTS. D E S I G N 5. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MOUNTED TO UNISTRUT FRAME AS PER 5,_61, ¢OVERNIN6 CODE REQUIREMENTS. G R 0 U P ,, 2" 7/ CAP (HELD ALL AROUND) ~ ~ A R C H I T E C T U R E / (TYPICAL OF 2) NN..b(2 E N G I N E E R I N /~ "~.1.I I P.O. BOX3 "" xc5- ~til- MOp~L '~®O-,=®-LP, I III1~*:%11[11 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY07730 ~ FAX: 732.847.4335 g' I II ..~OALVANIZED UNISTRUT PLO00 --.. I I ~I11] .//(TYPICAL) QUANTITY AND LOCATION '""N 'II]II I . /~/_ ARCHITEcTLOU Moglino, AIA STRUCTURALR°bert W. Toms.ENG,N~ERP.E. .~ __.. - NJ - # A113345 Nj' - ~ GE 36209 "~ I¢Y ~[/=,,o U-BOLT (TYPICAL OF 2. PER ~' I[H411.T--- - It I ] PRoposED CONCRETE SLAB (~ ©; _ __ ~ ,r,~ ~ NY- :~ 028992-1 CTNY'- ¢~ # 22375075384 '" 'v- ..... T[i~p[2'~ UNISTRUT) ~ ~ b"xb"xl/2" BASE PLATE ~?~"_ ~-~-' -O <~ h", h PA - :g 061412 PROPOSED PTC / -- - ' ~ .', b"xb"xl/2" ~,ASE PLATE (TYPICAL OF 2) / --=&~ ~ SYSTEM (SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ~.. 5" ~. 03/Iq/lO ISSUED FOR PILIN6 FSC,a =_ FOR INSTALLATION PROCEDURE) (TYPICAL OF 4 I "w ' ~ I" T PER PLATE) 6" b'[ 01/22/'10 RE-ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION ~DC.c~ -u~ '['MIN. OI/IS/IC I%UEP FOR CONSTRUCTIOB BHo P"4o I II I H--PROPOSED2 I/2' NOMINAL--'"'ll I I II ' RE',/. DATE REVISION ORA.mN I I [I D~AMETER SCHE , , = 2) ,,, ,~ . ,'~ b"xb"xl/2" BASE PLATE !d/(4) I/2 ¢ HILTI ~ I / , .--- ~ II I I -=,- I Ill[Il / HIT HY-150 H/2 I/8" EMBEDMENT INTO X , I -' _ _ _ a i I ill ~CONG~TE SLAB(SEE DETAIL 2/A-5; ~0 SI~E ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION me' :n:l I UTILIT'T' NI©UNT ~ETAIL 2. I PO~T DACE PLATE PLAN 'Wir®l®~l tOT ,All, I I I 24x~ 5CAIN: ~/4-"=1'-0" Ilxl~ 5GALE:~/4"=I'-O" I 2.4x~ 5GAl-E: I I/.2"=1'-0" ~ SKYIINI: DRIVI= ilxl"/ 5GALE:I/2"= I '-0" I HAW'rHORN£~ NY "10532 NOTES, SIT~ .~e~.. NY'-751.4 I. THE ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF THE CPS ANTENNA SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE/'tlTH THE FINAL RF REPORT. 2. THE ¢P5 ANTENNA MOUNT IS DESICNED TO FASTEN TO A STANDARD M/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER, SCHEDULE 40, raALVANITZEO STEEL OR MTN JOS~: O'~N1P~T~Ol,4 STAINLESS STEEL PIPE. THE PIPE MUST NOT BE THREADED AT THE ANTENNA MOUNT END. THE PIPE 5HALL BE CUT TO THE RF=~2UIRED LENGTH (MINIMUM OF r5 iNCHES) USIN~ A HAND OR ROTARY PIPE GUTTER TO ASSURE A SMOOTH AND PERPENDICULAR GUT. A HACK. 5A~! 5HALL NOT BE ~[T~F I NFO~NTATION USED. THE CUT PIPE END SHALL BE DEBURRED AND SMOOTH IN ORDER TO SEAL ACAINST THE NEOPRENE cASKET ATTAGHE~D TO THE ANTENNA MOUNT. 5. THE MOUNTIN6 PLATE 5HALL BE FABRICATED AS SHOP~N AND ATTACHED TO THE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT STRUCTURE USI[N5 U-DOLTS. THE SUPPORT PIPE 5HALL THEN DE ATTACHED TO THE MOUNTINO PLATE USIN¢ THE OVERSIZE U-BOLTS PROVIDED TO ALLOH A~JUSTMENT. IT 15 21 ~ ~,OLgN"F"T" f:P-.OAD 4b CRITICAL THAT THE ePS ANTENNA IS MOUNTED SUCH THAT IT 15 HITHIN 2 DEcREE5 OF VERTICAL AND THE BASE OF THE AN'TENNA IS HITHIN 2 ~..,UT~-~-.'~O~I...IF=,N'''~ I I DECREE5 OF LEVEL. ~ .,_~_~¢P5 ANTENNA , (SUPPLIED BY LUCENT) , , , , ~-..~ I --CABLE TO PIPE CONNECTOR TYP. ' (TYP 2 PLGS) -~.~ ! / DURNDY TYPE ~AR (TYP 2 PLCS.) Q ~...,; ~ DILL OF: ~ATERIALS CO-LOCATIOX I~T/I$" x "US" 5LOTTED HOLE r"' ~TILT HOLES FOR ADJUSTMENT ,. 1 MOUNTIN5% - Z ~ ~ ~ / ~RA~N t~y GH~GKE~ E~h". ~ATE: I' I I I I / //'FOR M/4" NOMINAL , q~_' DIAMETER PIPE BRACKET ~.~<.~ =,. , ,. :~,~ QUANTITY ~-- -(')5- F (/' PLATE ~ -~--~'== ~ _. ITENI~* DESCRIPTION (each) MTB JPo 05/22/0q ~"'" I GABLE DRID®E '~ ~ / ~) I-I/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER sch. 40 x lb" LC. MIN 55 OR OALV. PIPE I '/~' //~ .-~ RAp,US PER MANUFAOTURER'S STANDARD G~ PLATE ,,*× ~--,** × ,,-,,4." L*.*ALV.*-*) , 1'-4¢" =- 2 HOLE LOS (~)~-/~ L k~ "0 A~Ie eROUNDINS KIT CABLE UTILIT'T' Ft~..AME ELEVATIONS ., #2 AH~ BCH ~/ ~N ('PROVIDED BITH KIT) ~ STD' U-BOLT FOR ~ 172" NOMINAL DIAMETER SCHEDULE 4-0 pIpE b'fOUNTINO !,1/DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND gASHER, 6ALV. 4~ ®PS NIOUNTI N® DETAIL '1/1~" x 2-1/~" SLOTTED BRAGF. ET PLATE ~2CIcBEAH¢®ROUNDBOA BAR~ / %~'--- TO MIOB ~_~ STD. U-BOLT POP I I/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER PIPE l.t/DOUBLE HEX HOLE FOR 5 t/2" NOMINAL NOTE: cPS ANTENNA MOUNTIN~ BRACKET NUTS AND I,~SHER, 6ALV. (SEE NOTE 5) 2 ~HEET NUi'q~]~'°-. DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 OVERSIZE U-BOLT PROVIDED TO PIPE, U-BOLT !~ITH DOUBLE ALLO!,',I +/- 2° TILT/ADJUSTMENT TO NUTS AND HASHERS. (TYP.) ACHIEVE TOLERANCE. & ~ / 2 I®PS I, dOUNTIN® DETAIL llxl~ 5GAIN: I I/2"=1'-0" 24x~6 SCALE: REAR OF ~__ o I o I I MODOELL ~ I I ~ BATTERY I I- I o I I o L I I I / ~ G FRONT OF CABINETS [N~TES: lEI. TOP OF STEEL ELEVATION I¢"+/- ABOVE 6RAPE LEVEL. LZFOR I'"1OUNTIN5 HOLE LOCATION5 SEE DETAIL 2/A-5. WITH 8" MIN. EMBEDMENT STA~ER BOLT5 AT ~'-O" C.C. EACH 51DE OF WEB 15'-¢"xlS'-O"x¢" THICK coNCRETE PAD (SEE DETAIL -- L REAR CcF CABINET5 ~ I pROPOSED I I _ I PROPOSED FUTURE ~ t L x ~ODCELL I BATTERY HODCELL % I I ~Sxlb I Im~ I I I ' ~ ~ ~ J b I ~, FRONT OF CA~INET5 %% I¢'-O" SLOTTED HOLE FOR I/2"¢ BOLT (TYP. OF I: CONCRETE PAP (SEE DETAIL B/A-5) 2 ] iMOUNTIN® HOLE LOCATION PLAN LEQUIPMENT SUPPORT FRAHE PLAN D/8" I' O" Ilxl"7 SCALE, : - 24xD6 SCALE, D/4"=I'-O" ~ROPOSEP 8" THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE SLAB 2 LAYERS OF &x6-8/8 HELPED HIRE FABRIC. SEE =LANS FOR PAD SIZE (TOP TO BE LIGHTLY BRUSHED) FINISH S~ADE 4" THICK LAYER OF 9/4" DIA. CRUSHED 5TONE BASE EXISTIN¢ UNDISTURBED VIR¢IN 5OIL __-- 5 ~DETAIL Ilxlq SCALE: B/4"=I'-O" b4X56 SCALE: 5/8"=1"-O" _FUTURE hloDoELL MoDOELL CABINET BATTERY _CABINET 15 -¢ xl~ -¢ x8 THICK CONCRETE PAD (SEE DETAIL ~/A-5) ?~_EQUI P1'dENT ELEVATION Ilx17 SCALE: 5/8":1'-O" 24x~& SCALE, 5/4"=1'-O" L4x4x1/4 (BEYOND) (TYP.) W~, (TTP.) DETAIL Ilxlfi' SOALE~ I/2"=1'-O" 1/21'¢ HILTI HIT HT-150 WITH 4" MIN. EMBEDI"1ENT, 5TACGER BOLT5 AT 5',-¢" O.C. EACH 5LDE OF WEB Ii FUTURE W~ ; CONCRETE PAD O'-4%/- ~L MAX. FINISN E=RADE (F~ONT ',/IE~) [24x~6 SCALE, I"=1'-O" EXISTiN5 C~RADE ~ STEEL TO BE PLLIP1B AND LEVEL, 51KA NON-SNRINK ~ROUT AS / REQUIRED I~'-¢"xl~'-¢"X¢'~ THICK CONCRETE PAP (SEE DETAIL S/A-5) HODOELL ~ (BEYOND) BATTERT CABINET---.~. Ilxl~' ~CALE: TOP OF CONCRETE PAD O'-4"+/- A~L PLAX. FINISH GRADE B'-¢"xl~'-¢"xS" TNICK / CONCRETE PAP (SEE DETAIL ~/A-S) ]]~?ULPhflENT ELEVATION (SIDE VlEk',l) W~ DETAIL [ L4x4xl/4 ~5/4"$ HSB-X ("PCP.) ~51~," GUSSET PLATE (BEYOND) (TTP.) SCALE: I L/2"=I'-O" ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 I Lou Moghno, AIA II ARCHITECT I NJ ~ # A113345 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ ' # GE 36209 NY - ~/O75384 CT * ¢~ 22375 PA ~ # 061412 01/22/IC SEAL metroPC& Wireless for All. 5 SKYLINE DRIVE HAWTHORNE~ NY 10532 mTX JO**. O~ivlPSTSOI4 SITE INFOP-i"iATION 21855 COUNT'( ~OA~ 48 OUTOHO®UF:, N"F 11~5 CO-LOCATION SHERT TITLE FOUNDATION Ec~UIPNIENT O5/22/Oq DETAILS AND ELEVATIONS JP-.EV. DESIGNo "" GROUP5 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT , STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - ~¢ A113345 NJ - ¢J GE 36209 ~- ~ 028992-1 ~' ~ 075384 CT - ~ 22375 PA - ~ O61412 ~ 01/15/10 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION ~Ho ~ P~OPOSED MONOPOLE EXTENSION / P~ ~ML5-2~3 (O~ APPROVED EQUAL) FO~ ~ POLE DIAMETER53¢~'-~'' ~ ~ PUPLIOATION OR U$E HITHOUT ~XFRE5$ ' MO~NT$ A~ ENGINEERED IN ACCORDANCE UITN THE~~ = CON$ENT OF THE CREATOR 15 ~T~ICTLT~P~OHIBITEP ~ LATEST ANSI/TIA/E~A-222 STANDARD5 ~ 11, '~'%%' PROPOSED SiNQLE STANDOFF A~~ ~ SITE JOD*, N~I4 FOR (~) ANTENNA5 ($iTE PRO f - ~ ~TN Jo**,OqHPSTSOI4 P~ HH¢I OR APPROVED EQDAL SITE INFORmATiON 21855 OOUNT~ ~OAD 4S CUTCHO~UE, NY II OO-LOOATION MTs dP¢ 05/22/Oq SHEET TITLE ANTENNA MOUNT xl7 SOALE, 3/5" = I'-0" 24xD& SCALE: 3/4" = r'-o" FRAME (TYPLCAL OF 2) PROVIDE (I) ~ORKEDLATC, ADSEMDLY AND D E S I O No PADLOCK EYE (TO PERMIT OPERATION GATE FRoM E,THER s,DE oF GATE¢ ., ~ .., O R 0 U P ~< ~ ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING MID-RAIL BRAOE (o ~ATE) / '- EXISTiN~ VERTICAL ROUND MEMDER ~ZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 ¢- TEL: 732.888.6210 % OONTRAOTOR TO FIELD VERIFY 40 HID RAIL (~P[CAL AT TOP, HIP ~IANE~R OF EXIBTIN¢ ROUND MEMBER Eon Mog~o, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ~ ~ ~ o75384 ~ I/2"O (INSIPE PlAMETER) ~ - ~ 028992-1 CT - ~ 22375 5OHEDULE 40 OORNER POST PA - ~ 061412 Il ~A~= ~ALVANIZEP (2" H=CH) OHAIN LINK PEN~ *lTH / 1 APPROVED E~UAL ,%'x~$ (PAINT TO MATCH MONOPOLE) m" 7% ~ , ,%~ Ilx17 5GALE: D"=I'-O" 24x30 50ALE: &"=l'-O" BARBE~ HIRE AT TOP OF FENCE ~ GON*ENT O~ THE ~REATO~ : ~ ' Wireless for All. ~ ' I 5 S~LINE DRI~ SPACED 14" ON OENTE~ ; '~ ~"' %' COAXIAL GABLES (WPIOAL) SITE UO**. N%qDI4 ./~N (PAINT TO MATCH HONOPOLE) I I/2"e (iNNER DIAHETE~ 5OHEDULE -~ ~ ~ 40 HID RAIL (~PIOAL AT TOP, HID ' ~ < '~ EXISTING VERTIOAL HONOPOLE ~]%E AND DO~OH) ~ ~ ~% SCHEDULE 40 CORNER POST II OAOeE eALVANIZEP (2" HESH) CHAIN / 6ONTRAOTOR TO FrELD VERIFY OMTOHOO~, D~AHET/R OF EXISTIN~ ROUND HEHBER LINK FENOE NITH PRIVAOY SLAT5 ~ ' BEFORE ORDERIN5 E~UIPHENT. ~ I ~% ~~%~N; //N~ AFaR FABRICATION, f~ . ~~ · ~X< MTs dPe O5/22/0q ~ [NOMINAL] AO~AL --~~ FOOTINS. FILL ~ITH 4000 I I/4" 1.58" PSI ¢ONORE~. (~PIOAL) I 5/8" 2.015" SHEET NLJ~ =- T ~ :'-: ~"}~ D E S I G N ~' ,%~T : '~ ~ O ~ ENGINEERING ~ ~ ~ o ~ p.o. ~ox3 %~ ' [ I ~~I;~ HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 0~30 N' II~. ~// oUT~ooR ~NCCO~UR~ TEL: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 2 1 0 liP, I ~.. - ~ Illil ~-. /' F~: 732.847.4335 ~ FLOOR CONTACT ~ II1' ~ou ARCHITECT S~UCTU~ ENGINEER PLAN ~ EOUIPMENT CA~IN~T - ' NJ - ~ A113345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 ~- ~ 028992-1 ~' ~ 075384 CT - ~ 22375 r ~ LATCH ~ i NNN ~ ~,i~ 12 POSITION TERMINAL BLOOK (OPTIONAL) OI/l~/IC ISSUEO FOR CONSTRUCTION /~ N ~- MULTIPOINT ~ROUN~ BAR SECURE NE~ M~TRO P65 IE~UIPHENT OADINET TO NE~ STEEL PUNNASE AS PER ~*NOT TO 5OALE HANUFAOTURER5 5PEOIPISATION5 (~P,) I I EQUIPMENT CABINET ~ETAI/S I lxl'-/ SCALE: I/4"= I'-0" I 24xB6 SCALE: I/2"= I~-0' I r=oR THE EXOLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT DUPLICATION 0~, USE P, tTHOUT EXPREES ~ITTEN AREA FOR (I) MOOGELL ~ABINET - 55.~5" x ~2" = 7.81 50. PT. ~ AREA FOR ri; BAKERY OABINET - 28.5~" x 2854": 551 SQ. FT. Wireless'--~or--" 2'-~" 4'-4" 5 $~LINE DRIVE AREA FOR (0 PTO OABINET - BO" x 12" = 2,5 5~, FT. ¢ ¢ , ~ HA~HORNE~ NY 10532 ~A~ ~ ~T~ ~ox ~~/ / ~ ~l'-~ 5/16"~4 ~/1~'' .~ 2,-6 q/l~,,T T='-4 ~/l~"'F ~'~' NEAPOHERTELCOCABINET(PTC) 4HOLES(~P)~ 21~55 OOUNT% ROAD 45 ~ m ~ ~ ~ MOUNTINS BRACKET TEMPLATE CO-LOOATION ~ ~ NOUNTIN¢ TEMPLATE HTs JP¢ 05/22/0q ~ 6ECURE NE~ METRO P66 PTC CABINET TO NE~~ SHEET TITLE ~ PLAN ¢ BATTERY CABINET UNISTRUT F~AHE AS PER SPECIF~OATION5 (SEE OETAIL I/A-4) EQUIPMENT SPEOIFICATIONS ELEVATION SHEET NU~ER ~EV. 2 I~ATTE~Y GADINET DETAIL~ 5 I~mc CABINET DETAIL5 -- ANTENNA SECTOR 0° MI2T MOT i'40T 0° MOT 0° EO~ 0° EOT RX/TX TX/RX TX/RX TX/RX TX/RX GABLE SOHEOULE LABEL I REO MANUFACTURER MOOEL:¢ CABLE ~NORE~-HDXSBI&OS-VTM TX/RX TX/RX ANORE!d-HBX6BI 6OS-VTM 'X/RX TX/~X &N~-HDXSDIS~-VT~ TX/~X TX/~X _EN®TH O IA. 165':t: I 5/8" 185'+ 5/8" 1&5'± 5/8" lSD'± 518" 165'z 165'± 2 BLUE I ®REEN 0° MOT D° EoTTX/RX O° MOT O° EOTTX/RX 2 ~REEN PROPOSED 'CDMA' PANEL ANTENNA~ ANDREB-HBX&N&DS-VTM FRONT vIELJ 51DE VIELU tOTE: GC TO VERIFY ALL MATERIALS ~ QUANTITIES PRIOR TO ORDERING. 3C TO VERIFY MODEL :¢5 P{ITH METRO PCS PRIOR TO ORDERIING. BILL OF MATERIALS NO. 2TY'. OIEBC..,RIPTION MANUFACTURER I I MODCEL .UCENT 2 I EZBFO BATTERY CABINET .UOENT ~ I ATO'i'SJ50 W8"¢ AIRCELL COAXIAL CABLES TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC 4 DPAO"/SEO 1/8"$1/10 DIN (P) CONNECTOR ~ILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC 5 GK-S'~SAC 1/8" ~ROUND KIT TRILO~Y OoMMUNICATIONS, 0 CS-UI2'f8 1/5" HEATHERPROOPING KIT TRILOSY 60MMUNICATIONS, INC 1 qqO'ATI58JDO I 5/5"~ AIRCELL COAXIAL CABLES TRILOGY OOMMUNICATIONS, INC 8 12 ~FAI5850 15/8"¢ 1/16 DiN (F) CONNECTOR TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC q 12 5K-S155A6 I 5//5" GROUND KIT TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC I0 12 C5-UI258 I 5/8" AEATHERPRooF:ING KIT TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC II 12 6' JAUOI2DMDM6 I/2"4~ JUMPER T/16 DIN (M) CONNECTORS 'RILOSY 60MMUNICATIONS, INC 12 5 ~EMOTE ELECTRICAL TILT KATHREIN I~ ~ ANTENNA - MO~EL ¢ ANDREH-HDX6516DS-VTM (ATHREIN ANTENNA CADLIN® NOTES I. COLORED ELECTRICAL TAPE SHALL MARl<. EACH END OF EVERY CABLE AS CLOSE TO EACH END AS POSSIBLE, 2. IN ADDITION TO TAPE MARKINGS, EACH END OF EVERY CABLE SHALL ALSO BE LABELED VqITH BRASS TAGS (SUPPLIED BY o~NEt~) INSCRIBED ~ITH NUMBER AND COLOR OF TAPE MARKINGS AS INDICATED IN THE ABOVE SCHEMATIC. THIS SYSTEM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL cOLORS. D. ALL TAPE MARKINGS SHOULD BE DONE IN SEQUENCE FROM THE NORTH ~ORKING CLOOKPItDE AD SHOHN IN THE 5OHEMATIC ABOVE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ANTENNA AND JUMPER CABLES FILTH DRIP LOOPS TO PREVENT UNDESIRABLE !~ATER RUN-OFF. 5. THE OONT~OTOR SHALL iNSTALL ADDITIONAL CABLE SUPPORTS AD NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SPAOIN~ OF DuO" ON 6ENTE~. 6. OONTRAOTOR ~ILL REOORO THE LOCATION AMP SERIAL NUMBERS OF ALL AN~NNA5, ANTENNA OONT~OLLE~ MOTORS, AND THEI~ 60~5PONDIND INSTALLED LOBATION AT THE TI~E O~ OONSTRUOT~ON. ~. ALL AND~5 MOTORS ARE ~ENDE~ 5PEOIF~O, AND ~ILL BE ~I~ED STARTING ~ITH THE MALE END OF THE 6ABLE AT THE BTS AND CONTINUE ALON6 THE ~UN FOLLOAIN6 THE "FEMALE UP ROLE". ~ANEL ANTENNA ,/CUO' STANOARO JUMPERS ;'~ ..~TX ~,6'-0 STANDARD JUMPERS TYPICAL. SECTOR CABLE ROUTING MINIMUM CADL~= DENDIN® RAOIUS GABLE P-,AD I US I/2"0 (ATOI2JBO) '"¢/8" 4:' (ATO%SJSO) I0" I-B/8"¢ (ATIDSJBO) 20" ALPHA ANTENNA BETA ANTENNA CABLE GAMMA ANTENNA CABLE ~-~ TERMINATE IN PFC CABINET AT BTS RED BLUE GREEN ITEM PART NUMbeR GABLE ~ 860 ~005~ (16.4') 2 ~CU 860 10025 ~ & ANTENNA CABLE S6HEN1ATIG Ilxl-~ SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 24xD6 SCALE: DESIGN-u GROUP ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 Lou Moglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ - # Al 13345 NY - 7~ 0289924 Robert W, Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ-#GE 36209 NY-~ 075384 CT- ¢ 22375 PA -# 061412 FOR FILING 01/13/IC SEAL metroPCS Wireless for All. 5 SKYLINE DRIVE HAWTHORNE~ NY 10532 SITE INFO~NflATION 21855 COUNTY P--.OA~ 48 OUTOHO®U~, NY' I I'::q'~ ;DESIGN TYRE: C,O-LOC_.,ATI ON NTB JF:'o 05/22/0q SHEET TITLE :F~..F= SHEET NUivlBEi~. I. ELECT~IC~ PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 208V OR 24-OV, 2P, D INIRE CIRCUIT FROM A RELIABLE SOURCE TO THE COMMUNICATION CABINET. THIS AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR PI®B MASTER ®ROUN~ BAR A ~LAOK PLASTIC TA~ ~ITH ~HITE LETTERS "HETRO POS" EN~AVEO IN IT. CD CIRCUIT ~REA~ER NEC NATIONAL ELECTRIC METER AN~ TAP LOCATION P~O~ TO INSTALLATION. THE A~OH[TEOT ~EilN5 THE PAPER~OR~ ~ITH THE VARIOUS UTILIT% COMPANIES ANP GAN SN~ ¢~OUND PPG PO~ER PROTECTION CABINET ~. O. ~O% 3 TEMPORAR% PO~E~ CONNECTIONS. H~P ~AIN ~ISTRIBUTION PANEL ~¢5 RI~I~ ~ALVANIZE~ STEEL ~P ~EATHE~ PROOF F~; 7 3 2.8 4 7.4 3 3 5 ~. TELEPHONE,PROVIDE A 2" CONPUIT ~ITH A 25 PAIR ~22 A~6 TAPPAN ~IRE AN~ GABLE ¢ 2250BB25/HBT/PB/BK/BLAOK OR E~UAL BY 5UPPLIE~: 5TONY POINT PN: 5PS~TOI-40 (40 ~T 1~85~5PE) 40 FOOT LENGTH ~ITH 4-~J45 CONNECTOR5 ORIHPE~ ON ONE EN~. Ecu Mog~o,A~ Robezt W. Toms, P.E. THE HAiN DEfAlCATION POINT ALLO~5 FO~ THE LEAST AHOUNT OP NOISE AND THE ~OST AMOUNT O~ PROTECTION. FO~ COST 5AVIN~5, A ~CHITECT STRUCTU~LENGINEER CLOSER DE~A~OATION POINT ~AY BE SPECIFIED IN HULTIPLE 5TORY BUILDINGS ~ITH THE APPROVAL OF THE TELEPHONE 6OHPANY. POP NE~ NJ- ¢AI 13345 NJ- ~ GE 36209 TELEPHONE SERVICe5 IN NJ, N~ ~ 0% PROVIDE A 4" CONDUIT AiTH A DRA~LINE FRO~ THE ~PEOI~IE~ UTIL[T~ POLE TO THE LOCATION OF THE NE~ ~-~028992-1 ~-~075384 CT - ~ 22375 ~EHARCAT[ON POINT. PA - ~ 061412 4. 6ON~UIT ~OUTIN~: THE ~ODTIN~ ~ THE 6ON~UIT ~HA~ ~E ~U6H THAT THE EASIEST AND MO~T ~AGTI6A~ METHO~ A~E O~D ~ITHOUT IMPAOTIN¢ THE BUILOIN¢ O~NER AMC THE AESTHETIC APPEAL OF THE BUILOlN~. ~EOAUSE THE ~OR~ ~EIN~ ~ONE is IN EXISTIN~ STRUCTURES, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO SHO~ EVERY JUNCTION BOX, LB, OONPUIT BEND, ETC. ~N A T~O PlMENSIONAL PLAN. IT IS FO~ THIS ~EASON THAT THE/ CONTRACTOR MUST VISIT THE SITE BEFORE AGOEPTIN¢ THE OFFER AN~ UNDE~$TAND THE TRUE IN$TALLATION OBSTACLES THAT ARE UNIQUE TO THAT ~I~ELESS P~OJEOT ~ANASE~. /2~ O~/I~/IC~SU~O FOR FILIN~ Wi R IN O M ETH 0 D S LEGEND,,/'%. 01/22/16 /0~ 01/13/1615SUED FOR CONSTRUCtiON I. ~ENE~AL: ALL ~I~N~ IN ~I~I~H~ AREA~ ~HALL ~E OONOEALE~ UNLE55 NOT~ OTHErWiSE. IN UNPINI~HEP AREA5 ~UOH A~ OUTSIOE SURFACES OF THE DUILDIN¢ UNLESS SPEOIFIOALL~ NOTEO. ALL NEC AND LOCAL ELECTRIC CODES SHALL DE A~HERE~ TO. ALL E EXISTIN~ ELECTRIC NT NE~ TELEPHONE OONOUOTO~5 SHALL BE OOPPE~ UNLESS OTHE~ISE NOTEO. SEAL 2. ~ELO~ ~AOE (UN~ER~OUNO IN EARTH OR ~ILL): ALL CON~UITS SHALL HAVE A ~INIHUH BURIAL O]EPTH OP 24". ~ANOH CIRCUITS SHALL NE NE~ ELECTriC NT NE~ UNOE~OUNO CONSIST OF PULLEO OONOUCTO~S IN OIREOT ~U~[EO SOHEOULE 40 PVO CONDUITS. CONDUITS THAT A~E ~U~IEO UNOE~ EARTH THAT HAVE HEAV% TELEPHONE 5OHE~ULE gO PVO. P~IOR TO EXCAVATION, A UTILI~ HAR~ OUT 5HALL BE DONE TO LOOAT~ EX 5TIM~ UN~ER~OUN~ UTILITIES. PICTURE5 5HALL TELEPHONE BE TAKEN OF ALL UNDErgrOUND ~O~ TO BE VIEWED AT TH~ PUNOHLIST. E EXISTIN~ UN~E~OUN~ D. INDOOR5 (UNGLA¢51FIED AREAS): ALL PEZPE~5 SHALL CONSIST OF PULLE~ OON~UOTO~5 IN EMT. ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS 5HALL CONSIST OP ELECTriC PL P~OPE~TY LIN~ ABOVE SU$PEN~E~ 6EILIN¢S O~ ~ITHIN DR% AALL5 SHALL OON$1ST OF TYPE MO METAL OLA~ CABLE iF ALLOAED DY COPE. CONNECTIONS TO T * EXISTIN¢ TELEPHONE CONdUCTOrS IN ~5 OONPUIT CONNECTIONS TO OOMMUNIOAT~ON CABINET AND VIB~ATIN~ EQUIPMENT ~HALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONdUCTOrS IN Wireless for All. 5 S~LINE DRIVE HA~HORNE~ NY 10532 SPECIAL EMPHASIS, CONCERNS, AND LIMITATIONS SYMBOLS alS** couNTY *OAD 45 CUTOHO~UE, OOHHUNIOATION IDENTIFIER PE6ORIPTION ~E~I~N TYPE: I. TH~ A~CHITEOT $HALL BE NOTIFiE~ IMME~IATEL% UPON ~ISOOVE~Y OF A P~OBLEM O~ OONFLhOT. GONT~AOTO~ SHALL P~OMPTLY ~ ~AFET~ ~ITOH ~ IP~NTIF~ ONE O~ MO~ P~OPOSEP 5OLUTION$ BUT $HALL NOT P~OOEEP UNTIL SO AUTHORIZED.. i PANEL BOA~ ~ NE~ UTILITY POLE OO-~OOATtON LimITATION5 ON I. COORDINATE ALL OlSOONNEOTIONS AND INTERRUPTIONS OF ELECTriCAL SERVICE AND ~ROUNDIIN¢ SYSTEM ~ITH THE O~NER, A SOHEOULE OF iNTERRUPTIONS ANO SHUTDOWNS SHALL DE SUBMITTED TO THE O~NER FOR APPROVAL. THE SOHEOULE OF INTERRUPTIONS SHALL DE ~ ELECTriCAL ~I~IN5 ~T~ ~¢ SU~HITTEO TO THE O~NER A HINI~U~ OF T~O ~EEKS P~IOR TO AN~ ANTIOIPATEO INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE ANO SHALL DE APP~OVEO (TU~NIN~ ~ THE O~NER ~EPORE ANY INTERRUPTION IS PErmITTED. SHEET TITLE ~ ELECTRICAL ~I~IN~ (TU~NIN~ OO~N) ELEGTRIGAL NOTE5 GONTRAGTORS ~ GOMMUNIGATION~ CABINET 'A'N I N O 'A' ION 2. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL COO~OiNATE HIS ~O~K ~ITH THE ~OR~ OF ALL OTHE~ CONTRACTORS ANO EXISTIN¢ FIELO CONDITIONS. , , ~AGKDOARP SHEET NU~DER REV. ' EX T N. Dsc CA NET. D E S I G Nu , GROUP z --",, x'+N 2. PI~OPOSED ELECTf~IC f~OUTED UNDE~®~OUND / "+ ARCHITECTURE /~ x~ E N G I N E E R I N G ,, ~. U~ ~XI~TIN~ M~T~R //' P.O. BOX 3 ~. HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 '" TEL: 732.888.6210 '~ 4. PROVI~ N~ 2DCA ~YPA55 UTILIT~ / AP~OV[~ H~T[~ ~OGK~T AN~ N~ 200~, F~: 73 2.8 4 Z. 4 3 3 5 / 2~OV, N~MA 5 FUSED LOOKA~LE OlSOONNEOT. ~ ,/ P~OVI~ (2) 2DCA, 25OV FUSES. Lou Mog~no, A~ Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STRUCTU~L ENGINEER ~. NE~ ~TO 6A~IN~T FO~ ~L~6T~IO AN~ NJ-~AI13345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 TELCO. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRA~IN¢5 FO~ ~- ~ 028992-1 ~' ¢ 075384 MOUNTI N~. CT - ~ 22375 PA - ¢ 061412 .... .-- TINNED ~ROUNO ~IRES TO NE~ ~ROUNO ~IN~. / -' S~OUNO ~IN~ 18" DELO~ q. P~O'VIO~ 5/8'XIO' 6OPPE~ ~OUNO RO0 01/22/10 RE-IS~EDPORCONBTRUCTi0N ~ ~ ~ AN~ GAO ~ZL~ TO ~ROUNP RIN¢. OI/15/lO 15SOEO FO~ ¢ONSTROSTIO~ P~o lO. P~O'VJ~E NE~ TEST ~ELL FOR ~ROUNO = ~ II. ¢2 50LID TINNEO CONDUCTOR (TYP) TO BE ~ OONNECTEO TO POSTS AND OTHER ~ETAE SEAL I ' 12. PROPOSED TELOQ CON~UITS ~ ~ UNOE~OUNO. I I 11, ,~) ~I ~ HA~HORNE, NY 10532 _~ '-? . j~...r. CONCEPTUAL, ~TU~ ~OUTIN~ T~ ~E ~ ~IT~ '~ ~ ~ ~N ~I~L~ ~N~ITI~N~. ~ ~ ~IRE ANO CONOUiT LE~ENP 21855 GOUNT~ CUTCHQ~UE, NY 11~5 I 24x56 SOALE: 1"=15'-0" 200 AHP FEEOE~ B~B/O ~ 1~5~ 2" Ilxl~ SCALE: ["=50'-0" FLOOO LISHT ~ITH 500 ~ATT ~UA~TZ ~ ~ I00 AHP FEEOE~ ~'2 * 1~6~ 2" CO-LOOATION LAHP. LITHONIA HOOBL ~ TQE ~00 120 LPI (2) ~12 ~12~ - ~/4" 80 A~P OIRCUIT 5.4 * ~8~ I-I/4" O*A~ ~V. ~ OONOUIT ENCLOSuREO-4 HOUR ~EOHANIOALToRK * ASO4HTINE~O~INE~UlVAL~NT.NEHA ~ ~~ ~- ~0 AHP C;IROUIT 2~10 * I~10~ 5/4" ~T$ ~*~/0 A~, '4~ - 2" OONOUlT Tl~ ~ ¢4 '8~ - i-I/4" 15 8 20 A~P CIRCUIT 2~12 * 1~12~ ~/4" SHEET TITLE ~ / CO~UIT ~ / T*LCO O~A~c TO S[[ [-I ~,, ELEOT~ICAL PLAN (A~OVE ~OUNO) SHEET NUMDE~ BANK, ~ OABI NET SCHEMATIC 2 loNE LINE 24xB~ SCALE: N.T.S, TEST WELL COAX KiT AT ANTENNA KIT ~;~ UNINSULATEI? CROUNO BAR COAX ®ROUNDS KIT AT ANTENNA, . <~ ~6 ®ROUND KIT (I) PER COAX CABLEt o COAX GABLI= COAX ~ROUNIP KIT ®ROUND BAR EQUIPMENT CABINET SECTOR ~ROUNO ATTACHED TO NEI ~I~-.OUND RIN~ N PER COAX CABLE SOLID · 2~'2 SOLID ATTACHE~ TO EXISTIN® ®ROUNO RIN~ TEST WELL % 5ROUND ROD ®P-.OUN~21N® ONE LINE PlA®RAM NTB. .~4xD6 SCALE, NTB. 2 I ANTE:NNA ®~.,OUNOlN® OE~TAIL Ixl-/ SCALE, NTB. I 24xD6 SCALE, NTB. HELL LOOP FOR TESTIN~ PVC INSPECTION TESTIN¢ FtELL- ~.OD 'CA~DPiELO' I=INISHEID ®ROUND ITEST IAIELL PETAIL I 24-x56 SCALE, NTB. Ixl'/ SCALE, NTB. FINISH - CONNECTION ASSUHED FROST LINE (TO Bl= VERIFIEO) J® OUN ~O~ EPETAIL 4 SCALE~ NTB. ~4x~ SCALE~ NTB. ®ENE~.AL NOTES ~H~=RE ICE B~.ID®ES AND ICE SHIELDS USED, BOND ALL POSTS MIA ¢2 SOLID TINNED ~'llt~E TO THE ®ROUND FOt~ NEPt FENCE INSTALLATIONS BOND ALL CO~NER FENCE POSTS PROM ®ROUND t~.IN® TO ~ "Y" TYPE CADY, IELD TO FENCE POST VIA CLAMP. (THOMAS 8 BETTS ~2 O~ APPROVED EQUAL) BONO ALL ~ATE POSTS AN~ ~ATE F~AMES ~ITH FENOE ~OUN~ ASSEMBLIES O~ APP~OVE~ EQUAL ALL OOAXIAL CABLES SHALL BE ¢~OUNOE~ TO A UNINSULATEO ~OUNO BA~ VIA CABLE ~OUNO ~ITS. NEWTON INSTrUmENT GOd,ANY O~ E~UAL. THIS ~OUNO BA~ SHALL B~ LOCAT~O JUST DELO~ THE POINT ~HERE ALL CABLES OO~E TO~ETHER AND ~ESOENO ~O~N THE TO~E~. THIS ~ROUNO BA~ SHALL ~E ATTAOHEO DIRECTLY TO THE TO~E~ VIA BLAH OLAHP. ALL COAXIAL CABLES LEAVIN® THE C01ivfMUNICATION CABINET SHALL BE ®t~,OUNDED TO A UNiNSULATED ®ROUND DAR VIA CABLE ®f~.oUND KITS. NEk'4TON INSTRUMENT COMPANY 0t~. EQUAL. THIS ®ROUND BAR SHALL BE LOOATED AT THE POINT IAIHERE THE CABLES ivlA,'r<.E A NINETY ~E®REE BEND OFF THE TOiAIEt~-.. 2'¢2 SOLID TINNED COPPEt~, CONIDUCTOR TH~ INSULATED ~OUNO BA~ TO THE ~OUNO ~IN~ VIA "~" TY~ 5/8"~/,sXlO' ®ROUND RO~ CAD!dELOED TO ~2 SOLID TINNED COPPER INSTALLEID IN 8" PVC TEST IAIELLS. #2 A~,I® SOLID CONTINUOUS TINNED COPPER P411~.E EXTERiOr~. ~OUNO ~IN~ TO ~ PLACED 2'-0" A~AY F~OH ALL FOUNOATIONS. SEE SPEOIF~OATIONS. 5/8"~/~, X lO' COPPER-CLAD STEEL ®'ROUND ROD. b'IO~P-,E THAN 2/3 Of= THE ROD LENGTH MUST BE BELO!,N THE LOCAL f=ROST LINE. NOTES ,4. 5. 6. S. IO. II. ANTENNA. (SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION, SEE At~.OHITECTUI~AL DRA!/tIN®S FO'~. MOUNTIN®.) I'qAST. ANTENNA JUMPE~. COAX ®ROUNID ~IT. DO NOT Bt=NBS. CADPIELD TYPE "MS". iNSTALL ON ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE. TO coMMUNICATION CABINET. 2 BARREL HYDt~..AULICALLY COi'-1P~ESSED CONNECTION PANDUIT CATALO® ~ CTAP 2-2X. ~6~ INTE®RAL ®ROUND CONDUCTOR FROM ®~OUNDIN® KIT TO ScaB. ~2 SOLIO TINNED COPPER ®ROUNDIN® CONDUCTOR 8" MINlivIUM t~ADIUS. 2 BARREL HYDRAULICALLY COMPRESSED CONNECTION PANDUIT CATALO® ¢ CTAP 2-4Q. TO NEXT ANTENNA. TO MASTE~ ®ROUND BA~. DESIGNu GROUP z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888,6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 LouMog~no, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-# AI13345 N~-~ 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTUEAL ENGINEEK NJ-#GE36209 NY-~ 075384 CT- g 22375 PA -# 061412 OD/Iq/lO ISSUED FOP. FILINe, 01/2_2/10 IRE-I! E)ATE metroPCS. Wireless for All. 5 SKYLINE DRIVE HAWTHORNE~ NY 10532 S,TE UO**. N'fT514 XT* uo**. OqNfPSTSOI4 SITE INFOP. HATION 21S55 OOUNT'r' P-.OAI:2 4S r~,UTC, HO®LJIE, NY I I~f~ ©O-LOCATION NITs JPe 05/22/0q SHEET ~.. t~---...O Y N D I NO SHEET NUMBEP-. P-..EV 2 7 T Ir7 j:, IIxl-~ SCALE, bITS. CI®E~E ~ROUNID t~AR' ANTENNA 124×S6 ANTENNA (SUPPLIEO t~¥ LUCENT) AOOA~ ~IEATHERF~ROOFI N® KiT (TYP 2 PLCS) :~6 A~® STRANDED ~.OPF~E~ ~ROUND ~IRE ~I:~OUNDED TO ~ROUN~D t~AR) (STANDAF~D ANDRE~ ~OUNDIN~ ~IT) APPROX. OONNEOTION of= OABLE ~ROUN~ KIT TO ®PS ANTENNA GABLE AOOA I ~ I ANTENNA"( ~ ~ II (STAN~A~ AN~ ~OUN~IN~ ~IT) TO PIPE CONNEOT<OR E~URNPY TYPE ®AR (TYP 2 PLCS) GROUNDING DE!TAIL SCALE: NTS. ®ROUNOIN~ KIT I/2"% COAX CAE~L~ MANUfACTURer'S STANOA~O · ~6 AW~ ~OUN~IN~ KIT 6A~L~ (~OVIO~O WITH K,IT) NOTE: DO NOT INSTALL OABLE CF:.OUND KIT AT A BEND AND AL~IA¥S DIRECT CROUND ~ILRE DOHN TO ~ROUN~ BAi~.. 24xS& SCALE: NTS. PTC PANEL SCHEDULE 200 AMP MAIN ,24 CIRCUIT 120/240V I 2 SPARE bO I00 MODCELL POPtER RECEPTACLE 15 D :6 20 LI®HT -~8 SPACE EBRE AC UNIT IS SPACE SPACE II12 I~14 I%18 Iq20 2D24 MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER RATINe - 22,000 AIC 2 IGONNEGTION OF C, AE~LE GROUN~ ~.IT 5 IPTC, PANEL SCHEDULE Ilxl-~ SCALE:NTS. IIx]7 SCALE: N.T.S. 24~3e SCALE: N.T.S. ~2/O STRANDED ~ROUNDIN~ 0 0 MAIN ~ROUNDIN~ DO~N CONDUC, TO,'~-. I I v fASTER GROUND BAR TERMINATION Ilxl-/ SCALE: NTS. 124xS6 SCALE: NTS. KEY NOTES (Sumloois C}, (~, Etc.) I. ALL COAXIAL CABLED LEAVIN® THE COivIMUNICATION CABINET SHALL BE ®ROUNDED AT THIS POINT VIA CABLE CROUND KITS. NEIAITON INSTRUMENT COlviPAN'd OR EQUAL. ~D-6142 (&ROUND BAR 20" I/4"), ~0~-4 (INSULATORS), ~3015-8 (5/5" B~AO~ETS), ANO ¢~012-1 (5/8"-II X I" H.H.O.S. HYDRAULICALL'f COMPRESSED LON® BARREL 2-HOLE ®ROUNDIN® LU® FOR ®ROUNI::)IN® CONDUCTORS BETP, IEEN CABLE AND THE M,.ASTER ®ROUND BAR TERMINAL. THOMAS ,~ BE:TTS ~4811BE OR EQUAL. 3. H'lfDRAULICALL¥ CO,PRESSED LON® BARREL 2-HOLE ®ROUNDIN® LU® FOR THE MAIN ®ROUNDIN® DOAN CONDUCTOR BETP, IEEN TH`,= MASTER ®ROUND BAR TERMINAL AND THE PLAIN ®ROUNDIN® ELECTRODE. THOMAS ~- BETTS OR EQUAL. 4. S/8" STAINLESS STEEL OlA~ETE~ ~OLTS CONNECT ~OUN~IN~ LU~ TO THE BA~ &. 7. 8. S/8" STAINLESS STEEL DIAMETER FLAT HASHER (T"'PICAL). STAINLESS STEEL DIAMETER LOCK P, ASHER (TYPIC, AL). S/8" HEX HEAD STAINLESS STEEL NUT (TYPICAL). PROVIDE LOCKTITE THREAD LOCKER RED TO PREVENT THEFT. 0 0 DETAIL DESIGN° GROUP z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4335 LouMoglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-# AI13345 NY-~ 028992-1 RobertW. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ-¢GE36209 NY-# 075384 CT- ~ 22375 PA-¢ 061412 95/Iq/lO SSUED FOR FILIN® DATE SEAL metroPCS Wireless for All. 5 SKYLINE DRIVE HAWTHORNE~ NY 10532 SITe JOEB:~. N'T'q'514 XT* Ua*,*, OqivlPSTSOI4 SITE 21855 GOUNT'r' P-..OAP 48 GUTGHO®UE, NY I1~ ~ESI®N TY'IOE: CO-LOCATION TITLE DATE 05/22/0q SHEET NUMBER REx/. II,