Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-65.-1-23
OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: MEMORANDUM Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: October 31,2011 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref. TAUBIN FAMILY TRUST #6509 SCTM#1000-65-1 TAUBIN FAMILY TRUST #6509 - Request for Variance from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123 and the Building Inspector's August 16, 2011 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for as built non-conforming building at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, 2) less than the code required side yard setback of 15 feet, located at: 625 Terry Lane (adj. to Southold Bay) Southold, NY. SCTM#1000-65-1-23 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with below listed policy standards of the LWRP and therefore INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features. Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. The structure is located on a beach, a natural protective feature as defined by § 268-3. Definitions. of the Southold Town Code. Chapter 275 -Wetlands and Shorelines of the Southold Town Code defines "beach" as BEACH -- The zone of unconsolidated earth that extends landward from the mean Iow water line to the seaward toe of a dune or bluff, or whichever is most seaward. Where no dune or bluff exists landward of a beach, the landward limit of a beach is 100 feet landward from the place where there is a marked chanqe in material or physio.qraphic form from the line of permanent vegetation, whichever is most seaward. Shorelands subiect to seasonal or frequent overwash or inundation are considered to be beaches. The beach in this instance extends landward from the mean Iow water line to the toe of the bluff. The toe of the bluff follows the 6' contour, the top of bluff line occurs at the 15' contour as indicated on thc. survey last revised February 26, 2011 and prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin Ill, Land Surveyor. The nonconformin.q buildin.q occurs seaward of the bluff. Althouqh section § 275-3. Findinqs; purpose; jurisdiction; setbacks is administered by the Southold Town Trustees, it is important to recoqnize that the non-conformin.q structure requires a 100' setback from the top-of bluff. In addition, the proposed septic system leachin.q pools require a 150' setback from the top of bluff. The leachin,q pools are shown as 50' from the top-of- bluff. The survey references flood zone AE8 for the parcel. I double checked the parcel on the FIRM maps and the parcel is listed as within the YE8 flood zone - Coastal Flood Zone with Velocity Hazard ('base ~lood elevations determined) and therefore the action does not comply with Policy 4.1 below: 1. Policy 4.1 "Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards." The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are recommended: specifically A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 3. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. Maintaining existing development and structures in hazard areas may be warranted for: a. structures which functionally require a location on the coast or in coastal waters. b. water-dependent uses which cannot avoid exposure to hazards. c. sites in areas with extensive public investment, public infrastructure, or major public facilities. d. sites where relocation of an existing structure is not practical The "as built non-conformin~l buiidin(~ and "as built" deck do not functionally require a location on the coast, are not water dependent, are not public and can be re-located outside of the VE8 Flood Zone to Flood Zone X (landward of the top-of-bluff line). Figure 1. Subject parcel. The followinq is recommended: 1. Relocate the nonconforminq buildinq and all decks landward of the top of bluff line. 2. Relocate the septic system leaching pools to achieve a 150' setback from the top-of-bluff line. 3. Require the creation of a landscaped buffer with a minimum width of 10' landward of thc Top-of bluff line. 4. Require the installation of qutters, leaders and drywells on the relocated residential structure to improve storm water control. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Jennifer Andaloro, Assistant Town Attorney Office Location: Tnwn Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northf~)rk.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 August25,2011 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. # 6509 ORR, Amy Dear Mark: (.05 ' t, &'~ 1000-65.-1-23 We have received an application for an "As Built" non-conforming building. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Encls. Leslie I~. Weisman Chai[/~}~n ~/ TO: Pat Moore for Amy Orr 51020 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: 08/I 6/11 Please take notice that your application dated July 11,2011 For an "as built" nonconforming building at Location of property: 625 Terry Lane. $outhold. NY County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 65 Block I Lot 23 Is returned herewith and disapproved on tho following grounds: Thc "as built" construction in the R40 Zone is not ncrrnittcd pursuant to Artiole XXIII Section 280-123 "A nonconforming building containing_a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered or moved, except as set forth below, unless the uso of such buildin~ Lc changed to a conforming uso". Per Artiole XXIII Section 280-124, the required side yard s~tback for a lot between 20.000 and_~9~999 ia 15'. The site plan indieeate$ a setback of 7.4' Authorized~Signature CC: file, ZBA. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS House No. 625 Street Terry Lane Hamlet Southoid SCTM 1000 Section 65 BIock_l_Lot(s). 23 Lot Size 27,672.03 sq.fl. Zone R-40 I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 8/16/11 BASED ON MAP (last dated)Nathsn Taft Corwin III, L.S. 2/26/2010 Applicant(s)/Owner(s): Amy Serena Orr Woodin, Trustee of Taubin Family Agreement of Trust dated 2/29/94 Mailing Address: 415 South 47th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19143 Telephone: c/o Pat Moore 765-4330 Fax #: 765-4663 Email: pcmoorel(~optonline.net NOTE: In addition to the above, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Patricia C. Moore Esq. for ( X ) Owner, or ( ) Other: _ Agents Address: 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 Telephone 765-4330 Fax #: 765-4643 Email: _pcmoorel(&optonline.net Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: [3 Applicant/Owner(s), or E Authorized Representative, or [] Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED August 1,2003 last dated 2/26/10 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 7/11/11 FOR: E Building Permit [] Certificate of Occupancy [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy [] Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Construction []Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) XXlll 280-123 nonconforming building with nonconforming use (seasonal dwelling under 850 sq.ft.) XXIll Section 280-124 Side yard setback of existing deck 7.4 rather than 15 (when deck cut back in 1976 code required 10' side yard setback) to seasonal cottage (dwelling less than 850sq.ft.) E A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. [] A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. [] Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section [] Reversal or Other A prior appeal, E has been made at any time with respect to this property, Appeal #1512 3/20/72 Lot Area Variance (Overton Subdivision) Appeal 03940 6/25/90 (shed in front yard) UNDER_(Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our ofjTce for assistance.) Name of Owner: Taubin Family Agreement of Trust dated 2/29/94 ZBA File # REASONS FOR APPEAL (additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature): AREA VARL4NCE REASONS: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: The existing summer cottage was relocated from straddling the property line in 1976, when the adjacent property sold. The subdivision was approved in 1972 with the existing cottage partly on the subject property. Harold & Sara Taubin (applicant's mother and father purchased the subject property) in 1973 and lived in the summer cottage. Applicant's au nt and uncle(Philip & Lottie Barth) purchased the adjacent property in 1975. When the Barth family was ready to build a year round house the cottage had to be relocated from the property line. The Building Department issued permit #8103 on 7/24/75 for the new dwelling on the adjacent Barth property. The building department in 1975 inspected the house and saw that the cottage was relocated IN 1977 but did not require the Taubin family to obtain building permit for the house relocation. The code in 1977 required a side yard of 10 feet, the current code requires a setback of 15 feet. 35 years ago when the existing cottage was moved over to the existing location on new cedar posts; a building permit was required for changes to "beams, columns [or], girders" and since no beams, columns or girders were required for the existing summer cottage the family did not obtain a building permit. The side yard was cut back from 0 (over the line) to 7.4 feet. The house & deck was made more conforming. The house relocation was required before the house was completed. The owner wishes to make necessary repairs to the cottage, as a seasonal cottage. The variance for the exist!rig deck was required by the building department when the owner requested a building permit to make repairs to the cottage. Since the house is a seasonal dwelling and has no co it is considered a "nonconforming structure with a nonconforming use". The cottage will not be expanded, merely repaired. The owner obtained DEC, Trustees and Health Department approvals for the proposed repairs to the cottage, however, the building department can not give us a building permit until the existing summer cottage is recognized as is and the deck is granted a variance. The cottage and deck predate most of the homes on Terry Lane and the original structure appears on the Overton subdivision in it's original location. The house is one of the original summer cottages on Terry Lane and the family continues to use it as a seasonal cottage. The deck is the main living area for the family during the summer. The adjacent property is not adversely impacted by the existing deck, there is a line of vegetation buffering the two properties. The Adjacent property (Kurz) obtained a variance for an accessory building and the existing house was expanded with a full second floor in 1992. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The dwelling is a seasonal cottage and Amy Orr wants to keep it as a summer cottage, the open deck has been part of the cottage since it was first converted from a fishing shack to a cottage some time in the 30's. The deck is 7.4 feet from the property line and continues the existing line of the stairs. The stairs were constructed around a tree, and wider for handicap access for the owner's father. The existing deck is the main living space for a seasonal cottage and has been maintained since it was first cut back in 1976. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: In 1976 when the cottage was relocated and deck cut back the code requires 10 feet and the deck is at 7.4 feet from the property line. The current code requires a setback of 15 feet which would require a change to the stairs, removal of a large tree and other natural vegetation at the top of the bank and significantly reduce the outdoor living space to a summer cottage. The cottage is not being expanded, the request to keep the deck, as is, is a minimal variance to preserve the existing condition. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The existing cottage, the existing deck and proposed renovation to the existing cottage have been approved by both the DEC and Trustees. The proposed renovations to the cottage will require the owner to upgrade the existing sanitary system, at significant expense, which provides the greatest environmental benefit to the environment. The surrounding land around the existing deck has been maintained and left natural since 1976 when the cottage was moved to it's present location. Making alterations to the deck and stairs would result in greater environmental disturbance than leaving the deck, which has been in place for over 35 years, as is. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( )Yes, or (X)No The cottage was relocated in 1977 and the deck was cut back to the requirements, believed to be in place, in 1972. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: X No. Yes (please furnish copy). This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box ( ) IF A USE VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED, AND PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED USE VARIANCE SHEET: (Please be sure to consutt your, attorney.) Signatii~e of Appellant or Authorized Agent ~ ~ (Agent must submit wriUen Authorization from Owner) Swor)~tg, before me this BETSY A. PERKINS NotaryPublic, State of Ne~ Yo~ No. 01 PE6130636 Qualified in Suffolk Cour~ \ ~ ~,ofnmission Expires July 18. ~L? APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: Taubin Family Agreement of Trust dated 2/29/94 Date Prepared:August 17, 2011 I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed:none II. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): none, variance for 1976 deck Dimensions of first floor extcnsion-maintaln existing deck ~ max width 20' x 35' (irregular shape) Dimensions of new second floor-none Dimensions of floor above second level: n/a Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): deck 2.5 feet above grade Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed post If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes ) (attach extra sheet if necessary) - maintain existing deck originally constructed (cut back) in 1976 at 7.5 feet from side yard Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: existing seasonal cottage Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: none IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): house 2.3% (635 sq.ft.), existing decks 3.8% (1,050 sq.ft.), existing shed .6% 070 sq.ft.) Conforming deck on east side proposed 105 sq.ft. (.4%) existing deck 7.4' - code requires 15' = 7.6' nonconforming x 30'= variance for 228 sq.ft, of nonconforming deck. This deck is the living area for the seasonal cottage Proposed increase of building coverage:_DEC & Trustees approved 7.1% sq.ft. For existing and proposed Square footage of your lot: 27,672.03 sq.ft. Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 6.7% (Existing House, deck & shed) V. Purpose of New Construction Requested :maintain as built deck, as is, since 1976 VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, etc.) as exist and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): deck is the living space for a summer cottage, any reduction of existing deck causes more disturbance to the property than allowing the deck to remain. Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show all yard areas of proposed construction after staking comers for new construction), or photos of existing building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes )q. No Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes please explain on attached sheet. 1 .) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? )/~ 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? '~ 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? /VO 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? x~ Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: ~-'FZD'bT" ~,trZ-q-ff//-~-"lQ and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? /V~2 Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? ~ yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: If Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. ~r ~,turtrq~. "~ ~ Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel ! and the proposed use ,~2L2/]0/0q~f.~/' C~)'~L'2?~- . (ex: existhg single family, proposed: same with g~rage, pool or other) i ~ ' Au"Cth-6~ed signature and Date 'Tow or so Tao v WIZEN TO 'U~R~ TtlI~ ~ORM: The fo~.m must be completed by, the apprteant for any speedal'us~ ipemt~t, site phtn a~d~ro~i~l~ ttse yurt'anco, or ~ubdivi,~ton approval on property $00 feet ~f a farm o~eratloa located in'agrlealtm.al district. All applicat.l, ons. ~tattffnent mrt~t bt t~fe~r'~tl ~o t&e Suffolk. Cou~ Depagtrnent of Planning Ot aec~rdal~c¢ with sedtions 239, .. m and'2$PTn t~f tite ~e~d M~' 4) Address ofI.,aml'Om~L2~5.~. ,J>~>~ · ,~/7~t ~c~,,h~p 5) D~o~9~.of,~o~o~bj,~:, .' ... . · . . - · . . ~.. ~e To~ A~So~ O~, To~ I~l l~afloa (765-1937) o?. ~om . l~afi~ by. ~c~ t~o p~el numb~ on ~e.To~ of 8outfiold Real Prop~ T~ Sys~ (Please u~* ~ck s,d* o~'page i£~k~re ~.six pt~pcn~y owners ~ idcn~.) '.. ~ ~m~~~~of~s ~ 765-1809. ' . . ' · ~,~~.' ..,. ,...,. ..... , ~/~.~/ · . . . PROJECT ID NUMBER PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION I 617.20 SEQR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only ( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) LICANT/$P~NBOR( 2. PROJECT NAME · 3.PROJECT LOCATION: 4. PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Reed Intersecliona, Prominenl landmarks e~c -or provide mai) 5. iS PROPOSED ACTION: [] Now []Expansion [~ModiflcatJon/al~eml~on ~ 6, DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: ?, AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially ! ,~ acres Ul~Jmalely ,~ ~ acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? t0 DOES A~ION I~OLVE A PERMIT ~PROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTI~TELY FROM A~ OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ~Y~ ~No IJ y~s, lls~ ~g~n~y n~m~ ~d ~.~i* ~ ~pp~ov~h l[~es, AS A ~T OF PROPOSED ACTION W~LL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDEO ABOVE IS TRUE TO ~lE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE °near ~ ~~'~ Dale: If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART Ii - IMPACT ASSESSMENT {To be completed by Lead Agency) =A DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR. P.,~'RT 617,47 If yes, coordinate the review process and use Ihs FULL EAF. B WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617,67 If NO, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency, E~TM E]No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Exl~ng air quality, surface or groundwater qualily or quanf~ty, noise levels, exlsling traffic pattern, solid waste productio~ or disposal, po[anlJal for erosion, drainage m Itoodlng pre~lsme? Explain brtelty: l I C2' ~e ~C. ~g~"~l I ~1 , hJ=~, or Other natural or cultural ~so~ ~'?; '~o~munity o¢ ne[gh~:~t ~l~;r~cte~? Explain bhefly: C3 Vegetatio~ or fauna, ash. shellfish or wildlife species, significant habfials, cr threatene~ ~r'~dh~gemd species? Explain bndlly: C5 Growth, subsequent developmenl, or related activities il~ei~'t~'~)~ i'nd~ced by ihs propOSed action? Explain briefly: I !ther Impacts (tm~iu~l,n~l chan~es in use of either quanEt~ D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (LEAl? Ill yes1 explsin bridfiy: E. IS THERE. OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BEt CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? if yes explain: PART III · DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE {To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: F~reachadversee~ectident~edab~ve~det~min~whetherit~ssubs[antia~arge~important~r~the~vises~gnificant Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. u~befl or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and {l) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that exptanations con[aiR sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed, If question d of part ii was checked yes, the determination of significaflce must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed acrid n on the environmental c~aractedstics o~ the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potenttslly large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur Then proceed directly to the FUL[ EAF and/or prepare a positive decia[ation. Check ~is box if you have determined, based on the i~formation and anatysie above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed acflor Name of Lead Agency Date Titie of Responsible Ofl'K:er P~int or Type Name of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from responsible officer) (Date) Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: d'~'}Qt4 (' )~-~. ~Px }l)7'~,i ~ , hereby authorize you to make any and all appli~ation~ to'he SuYfolk Couhty Health Department, Town of Southold Zoning Board, Town of Southold, Southold Town Trustees, DEC and any other necessary agencies on ourbehalfregardingourpropertylocatedat ~ 2~- -'"~FF~/ {.~0~. .. /oo0-- t~$-~ / - aB ! Very truly yours, Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION alteration to existing garage and new deck SCTM# 1000-65-1-23 625 Terry Lane, Southoid Taubin Family Agreement of Trust dated 2/29/94 variance for existing deck built in 1976 AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board [] Planning Dept. [] Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees Zoning Board of Appeals X Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [] (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) [] (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: [] Type: Town of Southold LWKP Consistency Assessment Form Nature and extent of action: existing deck built in 1976 7.4 feet from side yard rather than 10 feet Location of action: 625 Terry Lane, Southold Site acreage: 27,672.03 sq.ft. Present land use: house, deck and shed Present zoning classification: r-40 If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Taubin Family Agreement of Trust dated 2/29/94 (b) Mailing address: c/o Patricia C.Moore (c) Telephone number: (63D765-4330 (c/o Pat Moore) (d) Application number, if any: Previously reviewed with Trustee application Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No X If yes, which state or federal agency: __ DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects' of development. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Page 2for evaluation criteria. XYes No [] Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): Existing cottage and deck converted from fishing shack in early 1900's, cottage relocated onto subject property and deck cut back and modified in 19767 no change proposed to structures, except that repairs are required for safety and DEC& Trustees have required replacement of sanitary system (makin~ project more consistent with LWRP) Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IIl- Policies Pages 3 through 6for evaluation criteria Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate) developed property- not applicable, except that summer cottage pre-dates zoning Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 2 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section II1 - Policies Pages 6 through 7for evaluation criteria Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate)- not applicable NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See L WRP Section Ili- Policies Pages 8 through 16for evaluation criteria XYes No [] Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): Proposed improvements to the cottage will make it safer, new sanitary will be constructed (old sanitary is on the beach) Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21for evaluation criteria Yes X No [] Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): proposed improvements will have a significant favorable impact on water quality- residential use with a new conforming sanitary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section II1 - Policies; Pages 22 through 32for evaluation criteria. Yes X No [] Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): cottage is seasonal and replacement of existing sanitary is a benefit to ecosystem Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section llI- Policies Pages 32 through 34for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): No impact on air quality Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 34 through 38for evaluation criteria. Yes X No [] Not Applicable Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 3 Discussion (if appropriate): no hazardous waste on site, however, abandonment of old sanitary will prevent environmental degradation. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for pubHc access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): public access continues- no impact WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 47 through 56for evaluation criteria. Yes No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate) continuation of existing summer cottage Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LI~VRP Section 11I - Policies; Pages 57 through 62for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): no change to town waters (upland) Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands' in the Town of Southold. See L ~VRP Section IlI- Policies; Pages 62 through 65for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): no agriculture is conducted on the land Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See L~VRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): improvements will make existing structure safer *copy of Town form created on 2/11/06 Town of Southold LWKP Consistency Assessment Form ~ ~- &4':- i - ~.e TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY I~CORD CARD ~ ~ .ow~m , IsT''~ ~- j VIL~GE : J DI'.I SUB. LOT ~ ~ ~ . S I W ~ J J~PE OF BUiLDIN ~. s~s.~m~t ~'~ FA~ CO~. C~. M~. M~Vo~. I_AND IM~. /~-o ~ / TOTAL ~oo DATE ~-/~ ~,0 Tillable Woodland REMARKS FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meodowlond DEPTH House Plot BULKHEAD Total ,, C OWN~ TOWN t:ORME~ OWNER_ RES. LAND Tillable Woodland Meodowland House Plot o ,/£;e-'Fo ^(' OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY IiJCORD Y2,eR '/ $ VILLAGE W CO,'V~. CB. MICS. Mkt. TYPE OF BUILDING IMP. TOTAL /~-o ~ 5~-~ DATE REMARKS ' t' I / ~oO z/,9'o o [ FRONTAGE ON WATER / ~ ~ ' ~' ..s..j-'_~ ,u,: J.~T o o FRONTAGE ON ROAD j~ - DEPTH .~ ,~.~ BULKH~D Total CARD COLOR TRIM F_xtens]on 1 Exi~;on I Patio Total Walls Fire Place Roof Rac f~otlon Room Dormer Beth - ' toors Finish Rooms 1st Floor Rooms 2nd Floor LR. APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM TheTo of thold' CodeofElhi mhibit$conflic finterestonthe artoftownofficexsandem Io .The u of ts fi Is rovlde reformation which can alert the wwn of $slble conflicts ofinter~t and all it to ~ whatever action is ne . - _o avoid e. YOUR N^ME: {'~.'aatname. first name,'middle initial, un!e~syouarea I in in '~ "~' ppy g the name of someone elan or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the ather person's or company's name.) · NAME 0F APPLICATION {Chech all that apply.} Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other", name the octivity.I D° Y°U pera°nally (°r thr°ugh your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or chiMI have a relationshi wi of the Town of $outhold? "Re ationshin" ineh~cl~- t_ ....... P th any officer or employee r ........ ~ oy oiooo, marriage, or business interest. "Business intepeat" means a business, including a paRnership, in wh ch the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of lot ~mployment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns mote than $% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", Complete the balance of this ['orm and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship bctweeo yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through DJ and/or describe in the space provided The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner o f greater than $% of the sha~$ of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an o Pllcer, director, parmer, or employee of the applicant; or __.D) the aetua applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS I /? / / / /! ,I SURVEY OF PROPERTY S£TUATED Ar SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No, 1000-65-01 23 SCALE 1"=20' AUGUST 1, 2003 / ? Nathan Taft Corwin III Land Surveyor PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsy Perkins Secretaries June 3, 2011 Michael Verity Building Inspector 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) Re: 625 Terry Lane, Southold SCTM #1000-65-1-23 Dear Michael: In accordance with our meeting my clients have requested a pre-certificate of occupancy for their existing seasonal cottage which was constructed on the property prior to zoning, however, it was modified in 1973 in order to make the existing structure more conforming on the property. The existence and re-positioning of the cottage is documented in photographs and a subdivision map. The property card was never corrected to show the accurate placement of the cottage and decking. The drawing is reversed and the date of the relocation of the cottage occurred in 1976 not 1990. The structure appears on the 1920's photograph, it was a seasonal cottage on Land of Ollie M. Overton. Ollie Overton rented seasonal tourist cottages on his property prior to his 1972 subdivision. In 1972 the Southold Town Planning Board and Zoning Board (appeal ~1512) approved the minor subdivision of Ollie M. Overton, but the property line between lot 4 and lot 5 of the subdivision ran through the existing cottage. The cottage shows on the subdivision map. In 1973 the lots were sold to different owners. (Picture #2- same stairs down, same outhouse, same deck with house on east side of deck). The original cottage with the deck on the east side of the house appears on the Southold Town property card. (Copy of property card attached. In 1976 an application for a building permit for a new house was made for lot 5, prior to issuing the CO for the new house the portion of the frame cottage which encroached on Lot 5 had to be moved off of Lot 5. The existing deck was cut back to it's current location and remained in place. The framed cottage was picked up off of locus posts, and relocated to the east side of the existing deck (picture #3). The outhouse rotated 90* and attached to the frame cottage. (Picture #4) (picture #5) The existing deck did not move, was cut back away from the property line, the existing deck remained with a more conforming setback (7.4'). The seasonal frame cottage was placed on new locus posts and outhouse enclosed within a foyer. (Picture #5) In 1973 the Town of Southold had not adopted a building or fire code. The N Y State Fire Prevention and Building Code was not adopted until 3/1/82. From 1971 to 1983 the Zoning Code defined "alteration" as "any change in the supporting members of a building, such as beams, columns [or],girders". The cottage was repositioned in 1976. In 1983 "footings, foundations or bearing walls" was added to the definition of "alteration". Since the existing structure was not "altered", merely relocated, in whole, to within the same property, no building permit for this move was required. The seasonal structure (cottage) was constructed prior to zoning. In 1973 the setbacks for A Residential was front yard 35, side yard 10, both side yards 25 and rear yard 35. The side yard was cut back from 0 to 7.5. The rear yard setback, taken from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM), had been established by the existing deck. Maintaining an existing setback was permitted prior to the Zoning Board interpretation in Walz. 2009 Pictures show same house. The owners request a pre-c.o, which recognizes the pre- existing original seasonal cottage and deck, with a note of it's relocation to the east side of the existing deck. The owners wish to apply for a building permit to repair the plumbing & upgrade the electricity (for safety) as well as replace the rotted windows. This work is needed to maintain a seasonal cottage. The DEC and Trustees have issued permits for the existing structure and have approved the necessary repairs. Both agencies have required the existing sanitary system be abandoned and new system installed upland. I will obtain a septic permit from the Town Clerk. Please review the above and advise us on how you wish to have us proceed. V~.ry- t r~I~ yours, ~l~a{~icia C. Moore cc: Amy Orr (w~u~d not) OLLIE ~'v'~ OVEI~TON ~ O',.J I"~ 0 L. ID, fi-4 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS AC~IOH OF ~ BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. No. 3940 Matter of HAROLD & SARA TAUBIN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, section 100-30 A.4, (100-33), for permission to construct sn aceess0~Tf, building in frontyard area. Accessory buildings may'.~ lo~ted in the required rear yard. Property Location: 62gj~errY Lane, Southold, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 65, Block l, Lot 23. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on May 15, 1990 in the matter of the A~lication of HAROLD & SARA TA~BIN, under Appeal NO. 3940; and WHEREAS, at said hearingall those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zon%ng and the surrounding areas; and WHEP~EAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along the east side of Terry Lane, Town of Southold, and is identified o~ the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 65, Block, 1, Lot 23. 2. This is an application for Variances from the Zoning Code Article III A, Section 100-30 A.4, Section 100-30 A.4 (100-33), for permission to construct an accessory building in the frontyard area. Accessory buildings may be located in the required rear yard. Page 2- Appl. No. 3940 Matter of HAROLD & SARA TAUBIN Decision rendered May 30,~ 199~ ~ ,i~ 3. Article III A, Section 100-30 A.4 (100-33), In the Agricultural-Conservation District and Low-Density Residential R-80, R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts, accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses may be located in the required-rear yard, subject to the following requirements; A. such buildings shall not exceed eighteen {1S) feet in height. B. Such buildings shall be set back no less than three (3) feet from any lot line. C. Ail such buildings in the aggregate shall occupy not more than forty percent (40%) of the area of the required rear yard. 4. The subject premises is improved with a summer bungalow, and the proposed 12 X 14 shed will be approximately 16 ft. from the east property Line and 150 ft. from Terry Lane. 5. In considering this application, the Board finds and determines: (a) that the circumstances of this application are uniquely related to the premises and its established (b') that there is Ko o~e= meth6dLfor appellants to pursue; and placing the proposed accessory shed in any other location in the front yard area will require other variance relief;, (c) that the vari~D~e wi~ not in turn cause a substantial effect on the safsty, hea~th,~.welfar~, comfort, convenience and/or order of the Town; (d) that the variance will not in turn cause a substantial effect on the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and/or order of the Town; (e) that in carefully considering the record and all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as applied conditionally noted below. Accordingly on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was 3 - Appl. No. 3940 Natter Of HAROLD & SARA TAUBIN Decision rendered MaY 30, 1990 RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance in the matter of the application of F3%ROLD & SARA TAUBIN as applied under Appeal No. 3940, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the 12 X 14 acoessory building be 150+- ft. from Terry Lane and 16 ft. from the East Property Line. 2. 'That the 12 X 14' accessory building only be used for storage .purpeses and that it does not contain any utilities. Vote of the Board: Ayes:. Messrs. Goehringer, D~yen, Sawicki and Dinizio (Absent Charles Grigonis). This resolution was duly adopted. df GERARD p. GOEHRINGER/HAIRMAN ~V~D AND FILED B~' E.xamincd . ~-, 19 .~. FORM NO. 1 TOWN OP $OUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL ~OUTHOLO. N,Y. lt971 TEL.: 7G5. t802 Approved ................ ,19.., Permit No ............ '5/ SETS OF PLANS ............ SURVEY ..................... CHEEK ...................... SEPTIC FORH lqoT]~F¥ CALL . -~.~ MAIL TO: (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS a, Tills ~pptication rau~t b~ completely fill~d in by Wpewriter or in ink and submitted to th~ Building In-~ector, with 3 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to thc Buildin~ D~partm~t for the issuance of a Building Permit laa-~uant to the . ...................... State builder. Name of owner of premi~e~ >t[~,C~ .O..t-.~ .~/:'.a). ,t~...~C .~P~ .'~11..~ .' ........................................... (Name and title of corporate officer) ' Builder's license No..1,7. ~5.~ ~ ~-1~.( .............. Plumber's License No ......................... Electrician's License No ....................... Other Trad~'a License No ...................... 1, Location of land on which proposed work wd bc dol~ ' , , ', :,'. ;L~:.~.i~.~ ~.~r~l ~ ~ o o ]~-~.t~{ , }louse Number Street\ · ' · Hamlet County Tax Map No. lOSO$cctioa ..... ~.?. - . ' ...................... B)nck [ .. Lot , . ~q,~. ........ -., :. Subdivision ..................................... Eiled Map No. . ............. Lot ............... (Name) a. Existing use and occupancy ,-. ,°~-- · .~5- '~v' '~- -~' ~' '~' "~' ~ ~ ; '') , - ... · .. ;,)~: ....~., -.-~-~ ;~ .~,~, ................ ...... ' "'~; :?.'.~?..;,.;;.:~&~..:.?'.r ............. .............. ' ............... '~' (Description) 4. Estim~t~'dCost. /q~b~©. . - , . ................. .. Fee , ............................... ' 8. Dime'~sion$ of en~m new const~ction: Front .... ~ ~ . t~ . ~ ?;, Rear .... ) ~ ...... Depth .. J ~ ......... Hci~t .... ~ ........ Number of Stories..'; fi;Lt. . ~.;. ~.; ~ ........................................ 9. S~eoflot:Front ..... [qP .............. ~:. ..... ~ .............. Dcp~ ..~ ............. 10. DataofPurch~ .... ~.~.(.~ .............. NameofFo~erOwner .~(~-~,~P~ ....... 13. W~l ~t be r~ded ...... ~. ~. ..... ;:.,; ........ Will excas~fill ~ovcd from premis~: Yes No 14. N~eof~erofptem~H~XOY.~.l~ ...... ~'ddre~$~,*~,, -P oneNo~ ~r ~(~ P~T DIAG ~ (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and i$ duly authorlzcd tO perform or ]lave performed the said work and to make and file th. is work w~l be performed in rile re:tuner set fo~tJl in thc application filed therewith. Amy Taubin Woodin Orr 625 Terry Lane, Southold NY 11971 215-518-1733 amyorrl @gmail.com Photograph 1 ^ historic photograph of Founder Landing shows small bathhouses stringing the beach. We believe the beach cottage at 625 Terry Lane is one of those structures. Photograph 2 2-top left 1973 At time of purchase, the Cottage sat the property line between 625 and 725 Terry Lane. The bathroom, a separate structure, stood completely on the 625 properties, about 8 feet to the east of the cottage. 2-top right 1977 The Cottage was moved off the property line and completely onto 625 Terry LA. To do so without moving the sewage system, the bathroom stayed pretty much in the same location while the Cottage was moved from the south side of the bathroom structure to the north side. 2-bottom left The bathroom was turned 90 degrees and attached to the cottage 2-bottom right An entranceway was added to attach the bathroom to the Cottage indoors. Photograph 3 3-top left 1977 View of south side of Cottage from Founders Landing beach 3-top right 2011 View of south side of Cottage 3-bottom left 1977 View of north side of cottage 3-bottom right 2011 View of north side of cottage Photogra_oh 4 2011 Recent interiors View toward Founders Landing, postcard date unknown. 625 Terry Lane, 1973 before move off property line 1977, cottage moved northeast. 1977, outhouse turned and attached to cottage t977, vestibule and storage closet added 1977, view from Founders Landing 2011 1977, northeast side 2011, front and northeast side. 2011, kitchen 2011, kitchen/living area 20I 1, view toward front room 2011, bathroom S3URVE'Y' Ot= F:~OImERT'Y' ,~ITUATE~ ORIENT TOI'~: ~HOLD -eUI=FOLK C, OUNTY, NY /',PPROVED IOWN OF SOUTHOLD DAT~ ~/l~/ee .IOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR EU~VE'i" OF: Pt;~OPERTY' 51'fi.lATE-- ORIENT TOlalN; .SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) -/ - CAST IRON COVER TO GRADE ELEV 135' / / ~ / / MAX HOUSE ELEV. 70~ APPROVED PIPE INV. EL, mln PITCH CD' MIN 4" SEPTIC TANK APPROVED PIPE mtn, PITCH EL. EL, TEST HOLE DATA DISTRIBUTION POOLS 5 POOL SYSTEM SEPTIC TANK (1) CLEAN COLLAR BOT EL 6,5' GROUND WATER ELEV 1.1' LEACHING POOLS (5) / / / / / N SURVEY OF PROPERTY S[TUA TED A T SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-65-01-23 1" 20' SCALE = AUGUST 1, 2005 AUGUST 61, 2009 UPDATE MAP OCTOBER 2, 2009 REVISE PROP, DECK NOVEMBER 19, 2009 REVISED AS PER S CD.HS. NOTICE 10/19/09 FEBRUARY 26, 2010 REVISED AS PER B.C D H S. NOTICE JANUARY 22, 2010 AREA 27,672,05 sq. ft. (TO TIE LINE) 0,635 ac. NOTES: ~, ELEVATIONS ARE REEERENCEO TO N.D.V.D. 1929 BATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: x~ EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: - FIRST FLOOR TOP OF WALL 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36105C0166 H 5. ANY WETLAND BOUNDARIES SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY NEW YORK STATE AND/OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES. 4. MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES FOR A 1 TO $ BEDROOM HOUSE IS 1 TANK; 8' LONG, 4'-5" WIDE, 6'-7" DEEP 5. MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR A 1 TO ~ BEDROOM 5 POOLS; 2' DEEP, 8' die. ~PROPOSEB EXPANSION POOL (~PROPOSED LEACHING POOL O~PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK 6. EXISTING CESSPOOL TO BE PUMPED CLEAN AND 7. ~2 cu. yds. OF MATERIAL SHALL BE EXCAVATED 1,000 GALLONS. HOUSE IS 250 sq ff SIDEWALL AREA. EITHER REMOVED OR FILLED WITH CLEAN FOR THE SANITARY SYSTEM, SAND. / / / / / / / / ~EC~ZVED AU~ 2 4 2011 ~OARD OF APPEAL~ LOT COVERAGE DATA DESCRIPTION AREA ~ LOT COVERAGE EXISTING HOUSE 635 sq. ft. 2.3% EXISTING DECKS 1,o5o sq. fl. 3.8% EXISTING SHED 170 sq. fi, 0.6% PROPOSED DECK 105 sq. ff. 0.4"/. TOTAL 1,g6o sq. ff. 7.1'~ THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHTS OF WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. PREPARED IN ABCORBANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR TLTLE SURVEYS Nathan Taft Corwin III Land Surveyor Successor To: Stanley d Isaksen, Jr, LS Joseph A Ingegno LS PHONE (6~1)727 2090 Fax (631)727-1727 261,