Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-51.-1-3 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To; Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: November 10, 2011 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for MICHAEL MCALLISTER & BARBARA JONES SCTM# 1000-51-1-3 En-Consultants on behalf of MICHAEL MCALLISTER & BARBARA JONES requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to construct approx. 150 If. of stone revetment along eroding toe of bluff with easterly angled return; restore bluff face with terrace retaining walls, approx. 1,000 cy. of sand re-nourishment, and native plantings; and establish vegetated 15' non-turf buffer with berm on landward side of bluff crest. Located: 17665 Soundview Ave., Southold. SCTM#51-1-3 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM INSTRUCTIONS I. A 11 applicants for perm its* including Iow n of Southold agencies, shall corn plete this C C A F for proposed actions that are subject to the Town ofSouthold WaterfrontConsistency Review Law. This assessmentisintended to supplementotherinformation used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determ ination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting, facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. SCTM# 51 A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning DePartment, all local libraries and the Iown Clerk's office. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION - 3 PROJECT NAME BARBARA JONES & MICHAEL McALLISTER The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoard [~ PlanningBoard[~] Building Dept. ['-] BoardofTrustees[~ Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: In conjunction with adjacent property to west, construct approximately 150 linear feet of stone revetment along eroding toe of bluffwith easterly angled return; restore bluff face with terrace retaining walls, approximately 1,000 cubic yards of sand renourishment, and native plantings; and establish vegetated 15' nonturf buffer with berm on landward side of bluffcrest, all as depicted and detailed on the site plan prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E., P.C., last dated October 24, 2011. Location of action: 17665 SOUNDVIEW AVENUE, SOUTHOLD Site acreage: 77,353 S.F. Present land use: RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING Present zoning classification: R-80 If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: BARBARA JONES & MICHAEL McALLISTER (b) Mailing address: 12 EAST 88TH STREET, APT. 5A NEW YORK, NY 10128 (c) Telephone number: Area Code 212-570-2218 (d) Application number, if any:. Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [~ No [~ If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide ali proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ~]Yes No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section lll- Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section llI- Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria See a~ached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. No The subject property is located along a stretch of Long Island Sound fronting Soundview Road in particular that has been severely impacted by extreme and accelerated erosion during several Nor'easter events in the past few years, culminating with an avulsive loss throughout the Hashamomuck Cove shoreline during the Christmas 2010 Blizzard, a shoreline condition that was more recently prevented from experiencing a full summer beach recovery prior to the upcoming winter storm season due to storm surge associated with Tropical Storm Irene in early September. In response to this erosion, several privately owned properties throughout this geologic cell have been forced to replace or construct new shoreline stabilization structures in response to accelerated shoreline erosion. The Town of Southold was similarly forced to make significant repairs to its public beach located less than a mile to the east and to apply for a publicly sponsored revetment project approximately several hundred feet to the beach's west in order to prevent the breach of Soundview Road itself. In addition to these lower lying properties to the east, both the subject property and the adjacent property to the west have experienced similarly severe erosional losses of their fronting bluff, as evidenced by a landward transgressing blufftoe, a steepening bluff face, and a sloughing of the bluff crest, all resulting in the loss of bluffand adjacent upland. As a result of the erosion of this property, the bluff stairway constructed less than 10 years ago has been completely lost to the Sound, and the retaining walls and remaining recessed steps at the top of the bluffare being severely undermined and are at risk of collapsing down the bluff. Thus, to remediate this process of loss and potential loss, an erosion control project has been designed in accordance with the generally accepted eroding bluff stabilization practices recommended by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service to simultaneously stabilize the toe, top, and face of the bluffby implementing a combination of structural toe stabilization and structural and vegetative bluff face renourishment. Specifically, a stone revetment is proposed to stabilize the toe of the bluff, which will occur first. Then the bluff face can be stabilized with terrace walls and renourished with sand and planted with native vegetation, including beach grass for groundcover and woody plants such as northern bayberry and beach rose. Comprehensive terracing will be used in the upper portion of the bluffdue to the limited space within which to rework the bluff crest. A nonturfbuffer to be planted with native vegetation will be established in place of existing lawn behind the top of the bluffto increase the absorption capacity of the upland area behind the bluff in order to reduce the volume of surface water runoff reaching the bluff. A small berm is also incorporated into the landward portion of the buffer to slow the potential rate of sheet flow mnoffdown the bluff during heavy rain events when water is moving faster than it can be efficiently absorbed. Pursuant to principles set forth by Chapter 275-11 (B)(1)(b), the proposed stone revetment is proposed in an area suffering from extreme erosion, as described above. Pursuant to Chapter 275-1 l(B)(1)(b) and Chapter 111-15, the revetment will be installed with a sloped face and angled returns with no surface encroachment on the beach seaward of the existing, eroded blufftoe so as not to cause a measurable increase in erosion at the site or adjacent properties. The structure is being installed in conjunction with the adjacent property to the west, whose bluff is experiencing similarly dramatic erosional damage. Pursuant further to Chapter 111-15, the purpose of the structure and integrated erosion control remediation plan as described above is designed specifically to stem the continued denuding and loss of the bluff, the property's natural protective feature; the design has been engineered in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and is likely to control long-term btufferosion at the site through long-term maintenance and its intended ability in to withstand inundation, wave impacts, weathering and other effects of storm conditions for a minimum of 30 years. In addition to the project's conformance with Chapters 275 and 111, the project is further eonsistem with Policy 4 of the LWRP because the structure is being proposed only where non-structural, vegetative means alone would not be sufficient to stem the ongoing bluff erosion; where the natural protective feature cannot be effectively enhanced without effective stabilization at the toe; where a hard structure is the only design consideration that can practicably and effectively provide such toe stabilization; and where vegetative enhancement is and will remain part of the long-term remediation plan design. It should also be noted that stone armoring of the blufftoe was previously approved both by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Town of Southold Trustees (Permit 5253) in 2000, but the owners delayed implementing the project with the hope that the erosional lxend at that time would perhaps be temporary and that toe stabilization would thus not be necessary. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ~] Yes [~ No[~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes ~] No [~] Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No ~] Not Applicable The proposed structure will be installed at the existing toe ofbluffand above high water associated with Long Island Sound and will not prevent or inhibit public access along the beach. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ~] Yes ['--] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~1 No[~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~] Yes [~] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 throngh 68 for evaluation criteria. ~] Yes ~] No [~ Not Applicable PREPARED BY ~ ROBERT IFOHERRMANN TITLE COASTAL MGMT SPECIALIST DATEocT. 25, 2011 Amended on 8/1/05 Town of Southold A. INSTRUCTIONS I. LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM Allapplicantsf0rpermits* including T0wn0fS0uth01dagencies, shatlc0mpletethisCCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the r0wn of S0uth01d W aterfr0nt C0nsistency Review Caw~ This assessmentisintendedtnsupplement0therinf0rmati0n used byaT0wn 0fS0nth01dagency in m a k in g a d e t e r m in a ti0 n 0 f c 0 n s is t e n c y. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. SCTM# 51 A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION - 3 PROJECT NAME BARBARA JONES & MICHAEL McALLISTER The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TowuBoard [--] PlanningBoard[~ Building Dept. [~ Board of Trustees [~ Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: In conjunction with adjacent property to west, construct approximately 150 linear feet of stone revetment along eroding toe of bluff with easterly angled return; restore bluff face with terrace retaining walls, approximately 1,000 cubic yards of sand renourishment, and native plantings; and establish vegetated 15' nonturf buffer with berm on landward side of bluff crest, all as depicted and detailed on the site plan prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E., P.C., last dated October 24, 2011. Location of action: 17665 SOUNDVIEW AVENUE, SOUTHOLD Site acreage: 77,353 S.F. Present land use: RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING Present zoning classification: R-80 If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: BARBARA JONES & MICHAEL McALLISTER (b) Mailing address: 12 EAST 88TH STREET, APT. 5A NEWYORK, NY 10128 (c) Telephone number: Area Code 212-570-2218 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ~ No ~ If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ~Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes--I I No~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ~Yes ~ No ~ Not Applical~e Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria See a~ached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [~ Yes [~ No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ NO [~ Not Applicable The subject property is located along a stretch of Long Island Sound fronting Soundview Road in particular that has been severely impacted by extreme and accelerated erosion during several Nor'easter events in the past few years, eulminat'mg with an avulsive loss throughout the Hashamomuck Cove shoreline during the Christmas 2010 Blizzard, a shoreline condition that was more recently prevented from experiencing a full summer beach recovery prior to the upcoming winter storm season due to storm surge associated with Tropical Storm Irene in early September. In response to this erosion, several privately owned properties throughout this geologic cell have been forced to replace or construct new shoreline stabilization structures in response to accelerated shoreline erosion. The Town of Southold was similarly forced to make significant repairs to its public beach located less than a mile to the east and to apply for a publicly sponsored revetment project approximately several hundred feet to the beach's west in order to prevent the breach of Soundview Road itself. In addition to these lower lying properties to the east, both the subject property and the adjacent property to the west have experienced similarly severe erosional losses of their fronting bluff, as evidenced by a landward transgressing blufftoe, a steepening bluff face, and a sloughing of the bluff crest, all resulting in the loss ofbluffand adjacent upland. As a result of the erosion of this property, the bluff stairway constructed less than 10 years ago has been completely lost to the Sound, and the retaining walls and remaining recessed steps at the top of the bluff are being severely undermined and are at risk of collapsing down the bluff. Thus, to remediate this process of loss and potential loss, an erosion control project has been designed in accordance with the generally accepted eroding bluff stabilization practices recommended by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service to simultaneously stabilize the toe, top, and face of the bluffby implementing a combination of stractural toe stabilization and structural and vegetative bluff face renourishment. Specifically, a stone revetment is proposed to stabilize the toe of the bluff, which will occur first. Then the bluff face can be stabilized with terrace walls and renourished with sand and planted with native vegetation, including beach grass for groundcover and woody plants such as northern bayberry and beach rose. Comprehensive terracing will be used in the upper portion of the bluff due to the limited space within which to rework the bluff crest. A nonturf buffer to be planted with native vegetation will be established in place of existing lawn behind the top of the bluff to increase the absorption capacity of the upland area behind the bluffin order to reduce the volume of surface water runoff reaching the bluff. A small berm is also incorporated, into the landward portion of the buffer to slow the potential rate of sheet flow runoff down the bluff during heavy rain events when water is moving faster than it can be efficiently absorbed. Pursuant to principles set forth by Chapter 275-11 (B)(1)(b), the proposed stone revetment is proposed in an area suffering from extreme erosion, as described above. Pursuant to Chapter 275-1 l(B)(1)(b) and Chapter 111-15, the revetment will be installed with a sloped face and angled returns with no surface encroachment on the beach seaward of the existing, eroded blufftoe so as not to cause a measurable increase in erosion at the site or adjacent properties. The slructure is being installed in conjunction with the adjacent property to the west, whose bluff is experiencing similarly dramatic erosional damage. Pursuant further to Chapter I 11-15, the purpose of the structure and integrated erosion control remediation plan as described above is designed specifically to stem the continued denuding and loss of the bluff, the property's natural protective feature; the design has been engineered in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and is likely to control long-term bluff erosion at the site through long-term maintenance and its intended ability in to withstand inundation, wave impacts, weathering and other effects of storm conditions for a minimum of 30 years. In addition to the project's conformance with Chapters 275 and I 11, the project is further consistent with Policy 4 of the LWRP because the structure is being proposed only where non-structural, vegetative means alone would not be sufficient to stem the ongoing bluff erosion; where the natural protective feature cannot be effectively enhanced without effective stabilization at the toe; where a hard structure is the only design consideration that can practicably and effectively provide such toe stabilization; and where vegetative enhancement is and will remain part of the long-term remediation plan design. It should also be noted that stone armoring of the bluff toe was previously approved both by the New York State Department of Enviroumental Conservation and Town of Southold Trustees (Permit 5253) in 2000, but the owners delayed implementing the project with the hope that the erosional trend at that time would perhaps be temporary and that toe stabilization would thus not be necessary. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [~] Yes ~ No E~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes [-~ No~ Not Applicable The proposed structure will be installed at the existing toe of bluff and above high water associated with Long Island Sound and will not prevent or inhibit public access along the beach. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No E~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. [-~ Yes ~] No E~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~] Yes [--] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes [~ No [~ Not Applicable PREPARED BY ROBERT F~HERRMANN TITLE COASTAL MGMT SPECIALIST DATEocT. 25.2o~T Amended on 8/1/05 Town of Southold A. LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM INSTRUCTIONS I A I1 applicants f0r perm its* including T0w n 0f S0uth01d agencies, shall c0m plete this C C A F f0r proposed actions that are subject to the Town 0f S0t~th01d W aterfr0nt Consistency Review Law. This assessmentisintendedt0supplement0therinf0rmati0nusedbyaT0wn 0fS0uth01d agency in m a k in g a d ete r m in a ti 0 n 0 f c 0 n s is t e n c y. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detaiL listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. SCTM# si A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION - 3 PROJECT NAME BARBARA JONES & MICHAEL McALLISTER The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoard [--] Planning Board[--] Building Dept. [--] BoardofTrustees[~ Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: In conjunction with adjacent property to west, construct approximately 150 linear feet of stone revetment along eroding toe ofbluffwith easterly angled return; restore bluff face with terrace retaining walls, approximately 1,000 cubic yards of sand renourishment, and native plantings; and establish vegetated 15' nonturf buffer with berm on landward side of bluff crest, all as depicted and detailed on the site plan prepared by Jeffi'ey T. Butler, P.E., P.C., last dated October 24, 201 I. Location of action: 17665 SOUNDVIEW AVENUE, SOUTHOLD Site acreage: 77,353 S.F. Present land use: RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING Present zoning classification: R-80 If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: BARBARA JONES & MICHAEL McALL1STER (b) Mailing address: 12 EAST 88TH STREET, APT. 5A NEW YORK, NY 10128 (c) Telephone number: Area Code 212-570-2218 (d) Application number, if any:. Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [~ No [~ If yes, which state or federal agency?. C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ¥es No Not Applieable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~] Yes ~] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria See a~ached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [~] Yes [~] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes No The subject property is located along a slxetch of Long Island Sound fronting Soundview Road in particular that has been severely impacted by extreme and accelerated erosion during several Nor'easter events in the past few years, culminating with an avulsive loss throughout the Hashamomuck Cove shoreline during the Christmas 2010 Blizzard, a shoreline condition that was more recently prevented from experiencing a full summer beach recovery prior to the upcoming winter storm season due to storm surge associated with Tropical Storm Irene in early September. In response to this erosion, several privately owned properties throughout this geologic cell have been forced to replace or conslxuct new shoreline stabilization structures in response to accelerated shoreline erosion. The Town of Southold was similarly forced to make significant repairs to its public beach located less than a mile to the east and to apply for a publicly sponsored revetment project approximately several hundred feet to the beach's west in order to prevent the breach of Soundview Road itself. In addition to these lower lying properties to the east, both the subject property and the adjacent property to the west have experienced similarly severe erosional losses of their fronting bluff, as evidenced by a landward transgressing bluff toe, a steepening bluff face, and a sloughing of the bluff crest, all resulting in the loss ofbluffand adjacent upland. As a result of the erosion of this property, the bluff stairway constructed less than 10 years ago has been completely lost to the Sound, and the retaining walls and remaining recessed steps at the top of the bluffare being severely undermined and are at risk of collapsing down the bluff. Thus, to remediate this process of loss and potential loss, an erosion control project has been designed in accordance with the generally accepted eroding bluff stabilization practices recommended by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service to simultaneously stabilize the toe, top, and face of the bluff by implementing a combination of structural toe stabilization and structural and vegetative bluff face renourishment. Specifically, a stone revetment is proposed to stabilize the toe of the bluff, which will occur first. Then the bluff face can be stabilized with terrace walls and renouxisbed with sand and planted with native vegetation, including beach grass for groundeover and woody plants such as northern hayben~y and beach rose. Comprehensive terracing will be used in the upper portion of the bluff due to the limited space within which to rework the bluffcrest. A nonturf buffer to be planted with native vegetation will be established in place of existing lawn behind the top of the bluff to increase the absorption capacity of the upland area behind the bluff in order to reduce the volume of surface water runoff reaching the bluff. A small berm is also incorporated into the landward portion of the buffer to slow the potential rate of sheet flow runoff down the bluff during heavy rain events when water is moving faster than it can be efficiently absorbed. Pursuant to principles set forth by Chapter 275-1 l(B)(1)(b), the proposed stone revetment is proposed in an area suffering from extreme erosion, as described above. Pursuant to Chapter 275-I 1 (B)(1)Co) and Chapter 111-15, the revetment will be installed with a sloped face and angled returns with no surface encroachment on the beach seaward of the existing, eroded blufftoe so as not to cause a measurable increase in erosion at the site or adjacent properties. The structure is being installed in conjunction with the adjacent property to the west, whose bluff is experiencing similarly dramatic erosional damage. Pursuant further to Chapter 111-15, the purpose of the slructure and integrated erosion control remediafion plan as described above is designed specifically to stem the continued denuding and loss of the bluff, the property's natural protective feature; the design has been engineered in accordance with generally accepted cng'meeting principles and is likely to control tong-term blnff erosion at the site through tong-term maintenance and its intended ability in to withstand inundation, wave impacts, weathering and other effects of storm conditions for a minimum of 30 years. In addition to the project's conformance with Chapters 275 and 111, the project is further consistent with Policy 4 of the LWRP became the smmture is being proposed only where non-structural, vegetative means alone would not be sufficient to stem the ongoing bluff erosion; where the natural protective feature cannot be effectively enhanced without effective stabilization at the toe; where a hard structure is the only design consideration that can practicably and effectively provide such toe stabilization; and where vegetative enhancement is and will remain part of the long-term remediation plan design. It should also be noted that stone armoring of the blufftoe was previously approved both by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Town of Southold Trustees (Permit 5253) in 2000, but the owners delayed implementing the project with the hope that the erosional trend at that time would perhaps be temporary and that toe stabilization would thus not be necessary. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [--] Yes [~ No ~ Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No[~ Not Applicable The proposed structure will be installed at the existing toe of bluffand above high water associated with Long Island Sound and will not prevent or inhibit public access along the beach. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy I0. Protect Southoid's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation crl'teria. ~] Yes ~] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. [--] Yes ~] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes [--] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [~1 Yes ~] No [~ Not Applicable PREPARED BY RT~HE TITLE COASTAL MGMT SPECIALIST DA TEoCT, 25, 2011 ROBE RRMANN Amended on 8/1/05 ¢ ~ LI~ AC ~A~ I. ~T PROUD 5TO~ ~ f~lSO PT LO~ (1~ (I) MET --- METAL 5'~A~R~A~AOF LIHIT ~ ~ -- ~ToH~.A~55-5~e-&~'~ A. THE ~IRST ROH ¢ A~ 5T~ ~b ~ INST~LED ~H THE MT5 --- NOT TO 50ALE ~OT TO %ALE ~ ~ ~1~ A~ ~OE~IN NITH HL~ OLO~. THE ~R 5TON~ HILL NS TE, LIMIT ~ B' ~-~ ~R A~ x ¢ N/O/P MACHINERY AOC~ FO~ THE P~P~EO ~ ~ILL ~ F~M, ~ BE IN¢TA! ~ ~ AT ~ BA~ OP ~E ~lSTl~ ~F, ~ 5TO~ PLO5 --- PLAO[5 P~:P ~ O~ 5TO~ HI~, A5 DEPIO~D IN SECTION 'A' (5~ ~. ~0 --- POLYVINYL OHLORIPE NEICHB~I~ P~PERTT TO THE ~T, VIA TOP OP BLUFF. ~¢ ,~ ~. SE 5EO~D ~N OF ~OR $TO~ MILk ~ INST~ED ~ SD --- STORM D~IN PLACED ~ ~PED ~ THAT T~ f~ OF THE 9LeE POE5 NOT TO --- TOP OF CURB BASE D~RI~D IN '1~ B' A~ FO~ A TOT~ HEleHT OF ~THOI-D~ O~ ~T ~ ~ ~ T~ ~ISTINO TOE OF BLU~ ANO ~FPOLK C~N~, HEN YORK 5TO~ AND D~ HILL AeAIN ~ 5H~D, ~PEP AND FILLED A5 ~R~OIN~ %~OULE ~ 0 ~t~TATION AND ~ED, THE ~NTI~ HILL ~ HAINTAI~ ~5 OF hD 2. CO~I~T P~P~ ~N-~F ~EE tiS' HIDE HINI~ ~ND~ [ P.O. ~OX I~ ' ¢ ~ ~ OF T¢ OP ~: ' APPLIOANT/OH~R, ¢ ~, A. ~16 TON5 ¢ ,-5 TON AR~R 5TO~ (a~ox. 4'- 4.~' Ol~ 1 ~ McALLIS~ D. P~TIN~, AS ~U ~Y ~PE ¢ ~ AND P~NTINO 2 OE~LNOTE5  ~DU~ (A~XIHA~LY 0~ 5P. OF ~-~TATION 15 '~( ~K ~NO~O OF TOP OF BLUFF, ~ ~. ~ DEBRIS 5H~L BE ~l~P TO P~ INTO ~I~RIN~ ~PERTI~. A. ~0.0 CU.Y~. OP 5~PY FI~ ~ TO PI~ ~ 0~ ] 4. ANY DISheD 8~0 ~LL ~ ~T~D TO BACK TO ORI¢I~L HI.IN B. PLACId, ~ ~'P BY %OPE OF ~K AND P~NTIN¢ ~P,~R~ LI~. ~J~P ~[N ~E ~-~RF ~FER A~ LE~ ~E A~ PkANTIN¢ 5O OULE~l~ ~H~E %~ ¢~ IF F~IA~ 15 ~ HITH A ~I~TION OF ~E FOLL~IN~ ~P C~) ~TABLI~P MImIN THE 5~ P~mlNO A~ HILL ..... R ~ ' ' '; ~ - ~" / ~ ~AN5 OF STABILIZATION ~E F~E ~D ~ERN BA~Y ~ PLANTINeDETAIL~ ~" ~ P~T$ UP TO 4' HI~ ¢" (5~IARD OF ~RIGA~NS~VANIO~TO~ATA N.T.5. ~R PLANTS ~ 4, Hi~ ~, HELL '" ~ANIbM AT A MIHI~H ~ F~T ON ~R. (SEE ~.dlgne~ycll.~m I ~0 Suffolk Coun~ on Long Island mu~ ~n~ ~pe of digging on ~elr pmpe~. Home.nero I_UFF STAEelLIZATION NOTES: pROPOSED 15' NON-'II~ BIJFFER FROM TO. BUJFF (THI.5 CABE EDGE OF RETAINII~ HALJJ 15' NON-TURF t~JFI:~R ,eHALL BE OJTFIT~ED HITH pROF~ D'H x I'H BEP~ INSTALLED e DJI~ RE-VEE~TATE ~FPER HITH NATIVE ~ATION (BEE PLANTIN~ SCHEDULE) D' MIN. EL. 52.0' , J_OP C, RE T.. ~ VEGETATION ALONG THE EDGE OF THE TOP OF THE .eLOPE eERVE~ A~ A PROTECTIVE BEFFER FOR  THE 5LOPE FAC,E. HAINTAIN OR ~TABLIeH A GREENBELT I",HIC,H HILL PROVIDE A E~FPER BETON THE eLOPE FACE AND EOADHAY AT TiE TOP OF THE BLgFF. THI.5 1,5 p,N~TIdJJLARLY _ IMPORTANT IN AREA.5 HJ-~ERE BLOPE~ ARE TO 51~--P AND TOO HI'EH FOR EC,ONOMICAllY FEA.51BLE STABILIZATION I,~'THOPe. THEREFORE, HNERE PO551BLE MAINTAIN A .STRIP OF PENEE NATURAL VEEHErATION ALoN~ Tt-~ BLUFF: EDGE. 'IHE RGOT50P THE VEC~'TATION CAN .511REN~THEN THE BLUFF~ RBEleTAHOE TO .eL[]i"lPJl~ OR eLIDING. P,I~RE THE BLI,FF~ EDOE 1.5 C,UERENTL¥ CLEARED ~ OR BEAR, REV HITH pLANT.5,q'~°,EBE INDICATED IN C,HART, BEYOND TO EXISTING HASHED OUT AREA TO BE RER~RBIeHED. -- FILL HITH TOPSOIL. T,O, 50IL TO BE 4" BELOH TO, EXleTIk~ RETAININ¢ HALL. PLANT NATIVE VEGETATION HITHIN THE 15'-0" HIDE NON-lURE J~FPER, 5~E PLANTING 5C,HEPULE, THID pl,,ke. MAJOR USE 1.5 TO .STABILIZE HOVIN~ .eAHD ALOI~ THE ATLANTIC BEACOA.eT AND C:~EAT LAKE5 RB~ION. IT 15 THE BEeT epEr,,IBE FOR THE INITIAL STABILIZATION OF FRONTAL DUI~/BLUFF. RE-VEGETATION, UeER,[. AG AN EROSION OONTROL PLANT ON NON-DUNE AREA5 k, HERE 5OILe ARE VERY DANDY OR INHERENTLY DROUGHTY AND ~ elTE CONDITION5 HAKE EeTABLIeHHENT OF SEEPED DPECI~D VERY DIFFICULT. IN THID APPLIC,ATION, THE BEACH CRA55 HAY ONLY SURVIVE A FEH TIeN~5, BEf IT pLAY5 A VALUABLE ROLE IN JIJHP--eTARTIt,~ PLANT E~7,CE5510N, ALSO USED ON 501Le HIC~I IN 5ALINITT, ~ A5 INO~q~IAL 14A~ NEEDIN~ VE6ETATIVE COVER, DESCRIPTION C~ERAL, C:~r~ FAHILT (POAGEAE), AHERICAN I~CON ~RAee, le A LEAFY, ,ePREAPlNe, REIZOHAT,Oge, NATIVE, ~NCH C~55 NITH HANY 5'I'EH5 PEP-. CLUHP, IT HAY REACH A HEIGHT OF 1HO TO THREE FEET. THE 5BED HEAD 15 A 5PIKE-LIKE PANICLE, ABOUT TEN INCNE5 LON~, AND APPEARE IN LATE JI/LY OR A~eT. LEAVE5 ARE LONG AND NARROH, AND HAy BECOHE ROI I ED OR FOLDED Ae IT HATURE~. ONE O~TANOlNE. 6ROHTH CHARAC,TERIeTJC 15 THE STRONG I~EP,~F, OUND 5TEH5 (REIZOiHEe) TtJAT SPREAD BENEATH THE 5AND AND ~IVE RI,~ TO MANY NEH PLANT.5. IT5 VI~OP-OU5 6ROHTH ENADLE~ THE pLANT TO HITh~TANP hEAVY DEPOSIT5 OF .SAND AND 5ROH UP THI~:~ IT. E.eTABLIeHHENT ADAPTATION~ IT J.5 NATIVE TO THE MID-A1LANTIC COA.eTAL RE~ION PROH MAINE TO NDRTN C,AROLINA~ AND THE GREAT LAKE5 RI~ION. JT HILL C.~H ON iNLAND HIGH IN eAND AND/OR eALINE CONTENT, pROVIDED APPLICATIONe OF FERTILIZER~ CONTAININE, NI"~EN ARE HADE. REGIJIRE5 A .~Y POSITION IN A LIC.~HT~ FELL-DRAINED eoIL AND le VERY TOLERANT OF BEVERE HARIT1HE EXpOSuRE. THE PLANT HAe A Ds-P, eTP, ON~ AND EXTENSIVELY CP~PIN~ REIZDHE, AND CAN DECOHE INVAeWE HI-IEN '-~HIN6 IN 5UITAELE CONDITION~. THID ABILITY TO COLONIZE HAKE5 THIS ~RA55 VERY VALUABLE FOR DUNE .STABILIZATION. PLANTINg. THE E~T TIFF TO PLANT BEACH C.~ 1.5 FROM OCTOBER I TO HAR~ ~0 IN THE HID-ATLANTIC, I~ION, BUT HAY BE EXTENDED TO APRIL 50 JN NEH ENGLAND IN HC~T .5EAeONe. IF PROPERLY PLANTED, r:~OD SURVIVAL C,AN BE EXPECTED AT ANT TIHE DtJPJN~ THIS PERIOD, EXCEPT ~ 50IL 15 FROZEN. ~JFiF~R PLANTINe5 ARE NOT eATIef:AGTORY. AHERICAN BEACH C.-RAee CAN BE PLANED EITHER BY HAND OR BY HECHANICAL EGglF:T'ENT DEelC~NED FOR THIS HORK. 1HE 5TEI~ OF PLANT5 (CULi'~) ARE UeEP POP, PLANTIN~ eTOGK. THO TO THREE GULH5 ARE pLANTED PER HOLE. 5PACE PLANT5 lb' BY 18" UNLEe5 HIND EROSION 1.5 SEVERE, THEN .ePAC,[I'~ JO P-~EP TO 12" BY 12', .eTAC,~R THE pLANTIN65 IN ALIt:~TE ROH6 TO PROVIDE HAXli~ EROSION 60NTROL. ON VERY .eTAJ~ AREA.5 J.~ERE HIND 1.5 NOT A FACTOR, A ,~AGIN~ OF 24" BY 24' 15 .SUITABLE, AN lb' BY 18" ePAGIN~ P~IRES CULHe PER ACRE, OR 1,5~ C,ULI"i~ PER, J,OOO ¢-~ARE PEET. BEAC,H C-~55 CULYE~ i~T BE PLANTED AT LEAST &' DEEP. THIS PREVENTe PLANT.5 FROH PRYINg, OUT, A5 HFII A5 BRINE, BLOHN ~ BY TNE HIND· A TILII~ OR DITCHING SPADE 15 AN EXCELLENT TOOL FOR OPENIH6 THE PLANTIN5 HOLE, THE CULHe AND ROOTe HUeT BE KEPT HOIST BEFORE AND DURli"~ PLANTING. OF PLANTIN~ HILL IHOREAeE IF THE DTCCK 15 PORHANT OR HAe HADE VERY LITTLE 5RO~m-L GULTIVAP-5, IMPROVED AHD eELECTED HATERIAke [VE~ETATIVE cULMe] OF 'GAPE' AND 'HATTERAe' ARE COHMERCIALLY AVAILABLE, T~H eBEP 15 NOT AVAILABLE. 'C,APE' 1.5 THE i'40~T REGENT VARIE1Y AND HAe P'c-'VELOPED BT' THE NA~RAL I~URCE5 C,ONeERVATION 5ERVICE [IN IqTO] AT THE CAPE HAY PLANT MATERIALe cENTERi CAPE HAY COURT HCUBE, HEH JERSEY. HATERIAL FOR THle RELEABE HAe COLLECTED IN BAPJ~TA~LE CGENTY, HA55ACHI,~ET'r.5, IT 15 VERY VIC-OP~, A HEAVY CULH PROOUY--,ER HITH LEA'.~ EXCEPTIONALLy Bf~OAD, AND 5PREAI~ RAPIDLY DY P, HIZOHE~, 'HATTERAe' HAe DEVELOPED BT' THE HORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIHENT STATION AND 15 BETTER ADAPTED TO 501~RN CLIHAT'~. HATT~5 HAe DEVELOPED FROM A COLLECTION OF I~' CLONE5 eC, REENEP FOE VIGOR AND PATE OF BEREAD. THIS CULTIVAE 1.5 CHARACTERIZED BY EARLY VI~OR. EL. 56 O' EL, 56.0' EL. 54,0' EL. 52.O' EL, 4b.O' EL, 46.0' EL. 44.0' HALL = TO THE LEVEL Of=ADJAOENT ~.I)FF FACE· DTABILIZE AND REINEOF-CE BT TERRACII~ AND PLANTIN~ W A~PRIA~ ~q~ ~ETATION. EL. 42.0' 5LOPE FACE VEE~TATION 5N~,LL BE ESTABLISHED ON PATCHY ANO BARREN eLOPE FACE5 AND ~LL BE ~R~ TO E~ION. V~l~ ~1~ GAN ~ ~AN~ ON ~OPE F~E5 A~ ~D TO 5~OO~ IN ~E ~ ~IO~T. ~EeE I~LUDE BEEP HlX~ ~ ~55~ AND ~6UM~ AND A ~ OF ~ HIN~ ~. LA~ T~ 5~LD NOT BE ~ED ON THE F~E ~ BLOPEe. ~IeTINO H~ ~ 5H~LP BE ~DE~INi~ ~ ~ ~T 5Yeah DY E~ION OR BY HIND ~ LA~ VOL~ ~ ~ CAN ~ DIe~D BY ~ ~ ~B HH~ THEY ~ll F~H ~ 5L~. ~ ~LTIN~ ~ B~ ~5 A~ O~ TO FgRTNEE E~ION, ~IGH HAT E~A~ ADVENT ~P AND ~ATION. IF EXleTI~ T~ ~ ~T~ ~Y ~OULD ~ ~ BE~ T~Y P~. ~T 5Y5~5 5~LD BE L~ INTACT TO ~IL ~ A ~T PERIOD ~ TIME ~1~ ~H LI~, ~L-~D ~ATION ~TADLI~ I~F. EeTABLI~I~ ~ ~TATION P~IOR TO A ~E F~I~ ~ULD ~ ~VA~E~. 5HI~J~ TO BE PLANTED Ae AN ALTERNATE TO BEACH E, RAeD HI-ERE CONDITIONE ALLOH, PLANT O'-O" ON CENTE~. SEE PLANTIN¢ 56HEI~-E AND DETAIL, DRAHIi~ NOJ EL. ~4,0' - EL, 32,0' EL,~O.O' EL. 28.0' CONTAINER OR BARE ROOT PLANTIN¢: CONTAINER OR BARE ROOT PLANTING II~OLVBE PLACIi'~ 51N64.E OR ~O~ OF ~P P~N~ I~O EXCAVAte ~LE5 ON T~ 5l~. THIS ME~D Hi~ ~A~Y 5P~AD INTO A ~lFO~ ~T ~E. ROO~D ~T HA~5 OFFER OLI~ THE ~T IHH~IA~ ~ION TO DE~¢IN~ AN E~ION ~NT~L AND BLO~ 5TABILI~TION ~ T~T CAN ~ A BLOPE. ~ A R~D PL~ ~IAL5 ~ Y~ ~ED A PA~T ACTION ~ ~ 5L~ A~Ae, ~15 ~0~ YOU TO AVOID ~E GRITIG~ ~RHI~TION ~RIOD FOR 5EEDiNO P~H5 OR ~OT ~EL~T ~ ~1~. P~E HA~I~ I~0 P~ITION ON ~E eLOPE ~INO THE F~L OR ~RI~. ~IOR TO PL~I~ HA~ IN HOL~ HA~ 5~ TO L~EN ~ ~OT B~ ~ IN ~E CABE OF B~E ROOT PLAN~, ~ ~ ~ R~T5 A~ NOT ~D OR ~T UP~ IN THE HOLBE. B~ THE I~ED~A~ 5L~ 5T~ILI~TION ~CTATI~ OF HA~EIAL5 A~ ~ T~ HI~, ~TIN~ 5H~ BE PLANED IN ~1~ ~CH P~I~. ~1~ HE~D ~LO~ YOU TO ~E P~NT5 BLI~TLY DI~E~T ~TI~ AND FOLI~ ~G~IeTIC5 5~N THE ~ ~I~ORCEH~T ~H ALL~ THE P~N~ ~T ~1~ FOR ~ eLOPE ~1~ TO POHl~ ~E PLANT ~NI~. PI~Y, IN GA~ ~T NE~Y ~ ~ B~ ~GENTLY 5T~ED, ~E~ HA5 FACTOR IN P~IN~ BY P~ ~ ~1~, ~L~ ~LL EL, 240' EL 22,0' / EXISTIN®~ STURBED .SAND 'TERRACINg: THE BLUFF FACE PROH A~ THE ARHOR aTONE BABE .SHALL BE EEDHApED TO A HORE eTABLE Ak~LE HHIC,H HILL BE HAINTAIN BY PROPOSED TEt~NC,IN~ ,AND VEGETATION. THE TEPJ~,AC.,E5 HiLL BE CON~TRJJC, TED OF UJHBER AND eECUIRED BY 5TAKED. THEY HILL F=I~3VIDE AOTABLE 5~REACE FOR VEC.-ETATION. CONTROL BLANKET5 TO pREVENT TIE PLANTIN~ ~JJRFAC,E FROM HASHING BEAC,H eRA55 AND ROSA RIk505A P[.,,N',ITED ON THE TERRACE5 OO THE MOST HORK TO HOLD THE BLUFF FACE. THEIR ROOTe HOLD THE 50IL IN PLACE AND DR,AN GROJNDNAI~R FROM THE BLUFF. THEIR FOLIAE, E 50PJENE THE IMPACT OF RAIN AND APPRONZEO PLANTINGS: ARE~G THAT NAVE BEEN FROPOBED FOR RE-VEgETATION 5HALL BE PLANED H~TH A COHBINATION OF THE FOLLOHINE, APPROVED PLANTINE~5. VARIETIES OF PLANTIIN~e (5t-lf~UBe, E~PJ~55E5 AND GE, GENe COVERS) BETABLIeHED HITHIN THE eAHE pLANTIN~ ~ HIII iNCREASE THE PROBABILITY OF eUCCE55R,L BLUFF STABILIZATION. PROPOSED ¢:~A55 AREA (HIX OF AHHO~ILA BREVILIE~JLATA) BEACH 6t~55 2-D ~OLI,IHN5 PER PLANTINEi HOLE 12' O,C HAX. HITH pANIgUH VIRE. ATUM) 5HITCH iEp, A55 AT 2uO'' O.C,., 2 GAL. CONTAINE~. AND pROPOSED NORTHERN BAYBERRY BUSH (HYRICA PENeYLVANIC,A) TO BE PLANTED AT A HINIi~M ~ FOOT ON CENTER. ~BEE PLANTIN~ DETAIL, eHT I) FROPOeED BEACH ROSE I~JeH (ROSA PJJE~eA) TO BE PLANTED AT A MINIHUH .5 IFOOT DH C,ENTER, (eEE PLANTIJ~ DETAIL, 5HT ~) ANp PROPOSED BEACH PLUM BUSH (pRIJNU5 HARITIHA) TO BE PLANTED AT A HINIMUH D FOOT ON C,EN~R. (e~ PLANTIN~ DETAIL, eHT I) EL, 50,0' / I EL, 4b.O' ~ By law, excavatam and contractors ~ork[ng in the five boroughs ~f New York Clly and Na~au and Suffolk Counties on Long Island musl centact DIgNet, 1.800.272-4480 or $11, at least 48 h~urJ but no mom than 10 working days (excluding weekends and legal holidays) odor to beginning any mechanized digging or excavnl[on wad( to enaura undergmuuff Ilnel are marked. Excavators and c, ontra~tom ~ln al~o eubmlJ legato requesct online, through ITIC. If you do net currently u~e ITIC, please c. all 1-800-524-76~3 51~ 5LOPE FACE NOTE LUFF PAC,E ~RRACING OTHER THAN AT TOE OP ~ eHALL BE INETALL PER TERRAC,IHG 5C, HEPULE. SEE DRAHIN~ No.I L~E, 2xlO C,CA BET PERPE'NDIC4JLAR TO ~LOPE ~GURE HITH 2x2x4' Icj .eTAKEe (6' O.C,) 5HALL EEHAIN IN PLACE, DELIBERATE CARE .SHALL BE TAKEN NOT TO OIe~RG ROOT BAOE OF EXleTINE~ PLANTIN05. EL.~¢.O' EL. ~4.0' EL, ~0,0' EL 2,50' EL. 26.0' EL. D2.0' EL, 240' EL. 22.0' PLANTED AD iNETRUC,TED IN PLANTING 5C, HEOULE, SEE DH~D I. eLOPE LANDHARO OF 5TONE HN.L eHALL BE .eTABILizt:~ BT' E4~,~4~ING, TERRACIt,~ FILLING AND PLANTIN~ 14/APPROPRIA~ NATIVE V~E, ETATION. AREA TO BE PLANTED APPROX. 20' HIDE x tleO' I EL. 20.O' EL. lb.O' EL. EL. 14,0' EL. 12,0' EL. I0.0' ' '%" EL. EL. 6.0' EL. 4.0' EL. 2,0' EL, 0,0' Ae 5HOHN (ENCABE C,ORE 5TONE ALL 51DEe) APPROX. 12.5' (:~1') TE~li, k5 · TOE OF ~ 5BALL BE riO O.C. HIN USE, 2xlO CCA eET PEPJ=Er, IDICULAR TO 5LOPE SECURE HITH 2x2x4' Icj eTAKE5 (b' o.cJ SECTION 'A' PROPOSED SHORE STABILIZATION STRUCTURE NOT TO SC, ALE 5LOPE TOE: AN AP, HOR .STONE BABE AT THE TGE OF THE BLUFF PROTECT5 THE BLUFF PACE BY COHPLEIELY .SE~:~AP. ATI~ LAND FROH HATER. THE aTONE BASE KE~ ~ EARTH A~ 5AND BEHIND THEH FROM GPJJHBEINO AND .SL[JHPLIN~. THE STONE HALL 15 PRIHARILY ~ED TO ~I.ST HAVE ACTION. TRE~ ~ ~OPY ~PJJB.5 CAN BE IJE, EFUL IN ~ISTIN~ UPLAND LA--ICING AND TOLEF~TI~ THE DTNAHIC, CNA~ IN THE COASTAL 5HOER 5YSTEq'4. VEEff;TATIOH AT 'rile 5LOPE TeE CAN HELP REP',.,~,E HAI;),INE E~ION TO HAiHA~SEHENT LEVELe. EL 20,0' ~ APPROX, DIeT TO HICH ,4ATER _ I EL. 120' J Pi~. TOE ~ BLUFF = EL. 113' -- PROp. 5TONE REVETHENT D-5 TON ARMOR 5TONE (4'~ - 4,15'~° 5TONE, TI'P) I -I E REVE'n'HENT 5HAJ-L NOT ENCROACH ON EXl.STI~ ~ 'B.C. EXC,AYATION = EL, 00' I ~1~J EL. lO,O' I l .. I EX. N,eH le' = ' o 10-15 LB CORE 5TONE (4 TO b RIP RAP) TO BE PLACED ON AND AROUND FILTER FABRI6 TO PREVENT ECOURIE6 PA®E: 2 oF 2