The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-31.-12-3 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator April 20, 2011 Proposed Wetland Permit for EDWARD FORTE SCTM#1000-31-12-3 Creative Environmental Design on behalf'of EDWARD FORTE requests an Administrative Permit to remove Locust stumps and re-vegetate area with native plants; install permeable stone patio; and relocate the existing deer fence. Located: 750 Truman's Path, East Marion. SCTM#31-12-3 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing ils written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney To'wn o! Southpld 13VRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM 2011 A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants Ibr pcrnlits* including Tov, n of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF Ibr proposed actions that are subject to the '[own of Southotd \\'atcrfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment ~s intended to supplement other information nsed by a '['own of Southold agcnc) in making a delcmlination of consistent.,,. *£xcept minor exempt actions including Buikling Permitv wul other mini.~leriuJ permits not located within the (7oastal Erosion Hazw'd A rea. Before aalsx~ermg the questions in Section C, the preparer of this lbrm should review the exempt minor action list. policies and explanations of each policy contained in tile '['ox~n of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Progranx. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If an.,, question in Section C on this tbrm is answered ",'.'es" or "no". then the proposed action '.'.'ill affect tile achiexenlent of tile LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency reviex~ lax'.. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail~ listing both supporting and non- sunnortinv facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy slandards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A cop.~ of thc t,\VRP is available in the following places: online at thc Tow n of Southold's wcbsitc (southoldtox~n.nonhfork.net), the Board of J~rustees Office. the Planning Department. all local libraries arid the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION S('I'M# ~ I ' /~ - C)$ The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response}: ]'own Board Planning Board[--']' Building Dept. [~] Buard of'Frustees ~ Catcgoq. of l'ox~ il of Southold agency action (check appropriate reslxmSC): la! Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning actMty, agency regulation, land transaction.) Ib~ Financial assistance (e.g, grant, loan, subsidy) Pemfit. approval, license, certification: N3lurc and extcnt~ti,.m: Site acreage: , Present land use: C-~ Present zoning classilication: ~ ~- '2. (22) If an application lbr the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the tbllowing information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( I (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require fi. tnding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [-"] No I~~'~ Il'yes which state or federal agency'? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will furlher support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that ~vill further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of developnlent in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient u~e of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ['--[Yes [] No ~NotApplieable Attach additional sheets if necessar.,, Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [-'-] Yes [] No ~'Applicable A~ach additional sheets ffnccessaD Policy 3. Enhance visual qualit?,.' and protect scenic resources throughout the 'Fovvn of Southold. See I.WRP Section Ill - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria [-~ Yes [] No [-~o, Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessa% NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes [] No [--I~No't Applicable Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies Pages 16 through/21 for evalu'ation criteria I ] ~es [ [ No ~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets fl nccc~sar.x Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 22 thrnugh 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ' No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessa% Policy 7. Protect and improve air quali~~ in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [--] ,"es [~ No [---~ot Applicable AUach additional sheets if necessaD Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section I11 - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes [~ No ~Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. · \ttach additional sheets if necessar3 ~,VORKI~NG COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's svater-dependent uses and promote siting of ness' water~dependent uses in suitable h)cations. See I),VRP· Section ill - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Anach addilional sheets if necessa% Policy I 1, Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and To~vn waters. See LWRP Section II1 - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. '[--] Yes [] No ~Applicable ,",ttach additional sheets if neccssa~ Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pa~es 62 through 65 fur evaluat un criteria. ~ Yes [] No~ Applicable Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of ener~' and mineral resources. See LWRP ~ Yes ~ No" "/~/~'o, Applicable I)ATF-~AJ~ PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT {To be completed b)' Lead A~lenc},/ B ,*,LL*~CTIONRE?EI.'E CC3P, DINATEDRE',iE,,%ASPROViDEDFORUr~L:STEDACTIONSiN6NYCRR pART6176~ If No anegabve J CC. ULD ACTI3¢; RESULT ir~ ANY AD'.'FRSE EFFECTS ASSOS'A'rED ~.~¢ITH THE FOLLOWING (Answers may be handwrfflen, if )eg*0le) PROJECT HAVE AN iMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSEO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL IS T~ERE OR is '~ RE LiKELK TO BE CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes expa,n PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: F~reachadversee~ec~ident~§edab~ve~de~errninewhether~issubsIantia~arge~mp~rtant~r~then~v~ses~gn~ficanI Eac~ effect sr~ould be assessed ~n connection with ~ts (a) se[hng (ie urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; {c) duration; (d) Irrevers~bd~ly; (e) geogra~h,c scope: and if) magmtude If necessary, add attachments or reference suppocting materials Ensure thai explanahons conla~n suffioent detail to show lhal a:l rele;ant adverse ,mpacts have been ,denbfied and adequately addressed if queslion d of part ~ was checked y es. the determ~nabon of s,gn. Rca nee must e valuate the po[ential ~mpact of the proposed action On the environmental characteristics of the CEA QUESTING PERMIT FOR; 1. IVIQVAL VE~TATtON £ 5. OF LOCUST STUMPS Ah~ RE WiTH NATIVE PLANTINGS, INSTALL PER~,GLE STONE PATIO f~owos~ ~ F~qCE PROP(~. ~ERM, S-~CSE PAiiO ~SIDENCE %~vl #- 1000-51-I2-03 Revision #: Scale: Landscape Plan' 3-24-11 Lands~pe Design by: David Cichanowicz Date: 4/5/2011 1" = 10' Forte Creative Environmental Design