Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-6396 James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE __ Pre-construction, hay bale line __ 1st day of construction ½ constructed __ Project complete, compliance inspection. BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 6396 DATE: June 2L 2006 ISSUED TO: PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS: 64300 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM # 56-7-2 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on quxxe 21 , 2006, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by Principi Properties, LLC and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to construct a new two-stow restaurant over the existing foundation of what was a restaurant with the conditions of gutters and drywells to contain roof runoff, a facility, a non-turf buffer to the east landward of the bulkhead, and all as depicted on the for the restaurant only and not for the marina, surveyed by Hands on Surveying last revised July 24, 2006. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee, Principi Properties, LLC, 64300 Main Road, Southold as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated[ time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation, the said Permittee will be. required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. The Permittee is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Department of Real Properties Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety (90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 10. That the Permitte6 w~rF6b~in ali 6ther pernuts and ~6n§entS that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 June 21, 2006 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Bruce Anderson Suffolk Environmental Consulting, lnc. P.O. Box 2003 Bridgehampton, NY 11932 RE: PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC 64300 MAIN RD., SOUTHOLD SCTM#56-7-2 Dear Mr. Anderson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wed., June 21,2006 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 31, 2006, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 268, said application was found to be Exempt from the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on June 21,2006, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC to construct a new two-story restaurant over the existing foundation of what was a restaurant with the conditions of gutters and drywells to contain roof run- off, a pump-out facility, and a non-turf buffer to the east landward of the bulkhead, and all as depicted on the plans, for the restaurant only and not for the marina, survey by Hands on Surveying last revised July 24, 2006. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, President, Board of Trustees JFK/hkc James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TowN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Please be advised that your application dated {"~,~ ~'l, ?~O¢o has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of 3"'L,~¢ z.( ~ Zoo6 and the following action was taken: ~J¢.~.~ n¢~ t-~ ~,~ .&c.H¢,(~. o~--~' (~)ApplicationApproved (see below) ( )Application Denied (see below) ( )Application Tabled (see below) If your application is approved as noted above, a permit fee is now due. Make check or money order payable to the Southold Town Trustees. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: '~ i~5f¢~ ~ ~o TOTAL FEES DUE: $ ~.,,~ BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees S~p 17 05 07:43p p.1 Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5198 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President Via Telecopier and Reflular Mail November 3, 2006 James King, President Southold Town Trustees P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mill Creek Inn Situate: Route 25, Southold NOV - 6 2006 Dear Mr. King, As you know, this Firm represents Mr. Pdnoipi and the Mill Creek Inn who are seeking to re-build the existing restaurant over its existing footprint. This Firm was retained by Mr. Pdncipi in Mamh of this year and on Mamh 21, 2006, Mr. Principi and I met with the Town's Building Inspector to outline the required steps in obtaining a Building Permit to re-build the restaurant within its footprint. We were informed that an approval from your Board was required. On April 26, 2006, a full application to re-build the restaurant was forwarded to your Board. Subsequently, it was discovered that the docks had been rebuilt using treated lumber and were different in size and number. On April 26, 2006 the applicat!on was withdrawn and a new application, expanded to address the restaurant and marina related concerns, was filed with your Board. Also, the applicant removed all of the treated limber associated with the docks and replacing them with non-treated lumber. Subsequently, we were advised that high mamh vegetation was cleared from the property. On April 21, 2006, I met with the full Board on site to review and discuss the alleged violations. A Re-vegetation Plan dated May 16, 2006 was prepared and submitted to your Board. On May 30, 2006 1 received correspondence from you directing me to revise my application for restaurant and bulkhead, only. The planting plan was returned to me and the marina related activities were dropped from the application. On June 21, 2006, your Board approved the re-construction of the restaurant subject to the installation of drywells, and a non-furf buffer off the scutheastem comer of the restaurant to be re-constructed. On August 10, 2006 revised survey were filed with your office consistent with the conditions of permit issuance. On August 28, 2006, I met with Heather Cusak, staff to your Board who informed me that the Health Department would have to "OK" the septic system. This, I do not recall being part of any decision made by your Board, although my memory is not always perfect. Shortly theraalter, Mr. Principi submitted the final approval of the Health Department for the previous restaurant and an engineering certification prepared by Lawrence Tuthill, which documentation certified the adequacy of the septic system. Still the requested permit did not issue and so Mr. Principi met directly with the Health Department. By correspondence from Walter Hilbert, P. E. Chief, SCDHS Off-me of Wastewater Management to you dated October 24, 2006, the septic system was declared to be acceptable for use without upgrade. Still no permit issued. I am now in receipt of correspondenca from James Richter, R. A. to you dated October 10, 2006, which correspondence contradicts the your Board's regulatory decision of May 30, 2006, your Board's approval of June 21,2006 and the determination of the Building Inspector which only required receipt of your permit in order to issue the requested Building Permit. I am sympathetic to runoff concems identified in Mr. Richter's correspondence but note that Mr. Richter has no jurisdiction over the instant application. Similarly, Mr. Richter can not establish jurisdiction of other agencies in this matter. I again request that your issue the wetland permit. I am authorized by the applicant to commence preparation of a larger site plan which plan will require approvals of the Town's Planning Board, Zoning Board, Health Depafb,ent, NYSDEC and your Board and suggest that Mr. Richter's concerns be addressed within that process as appropriate. I make myself available to discuss this matter with the Board during its next work shop although I do not know what more I can contribute to the issue at hand: the issuance of the permit for the re-construction of the restaurant as already approved by your Board on June 21, 2006. Please let me know if further discussion is required. S~p 17 05 O?:~3p p.3 Bruce A. Anderson Cc. R. Principi Suffolk County Department of Health Services Office of Wastewater Management 360 Yaphank Avenue, Suite 2C - Yaphank, NY 11980 (631) 852-5700 Health Reference Number Certification of Existing Subsurface Sewage Disposal Systems And Water Supply Facilities For Other Than Sin~ll,e Family Residence A. Name of establishment: ~I~IL(.C_..~=~.. 1) Address of establishment: Street (Ot']3~O I~-It4 Hamlet 2) Tax Map Number: District ~2~ Section 3) Owner's Name ~LI~O~[/LT/~I[' Zip I iq"/ Block 0'7 Lot(s). Phone 4) Client's Name (if different than owner) ~/~,~ 5) Type o£proposed use (e.g., deli, restaurant, office...) B. Sanitary System Evaluation: 1) Type of Water Supply: [~blic Water [] Private Well - Provide copy of water analysis dated within one calendar year 2) Date of system pumping b,~?t~- total gallons removed 3) Materials of construction of sanitary system [~rerecast [] Block* *NOTE: Block pools are no longer accepted - sanitary system must be replaced 4) Size of Sanitary components*: Septic tank gallons Grease trap Leaching Pools diameter effective depth diameter effective depth diameter effective depth total number of pools *NOTE: Sanita~ mmponents must meet cu~ent standaffis for proposed use or upgrading will be required. 5) Overall mnd~ion of san~a~ components: ~eptable ~ una~ptable (waste lines, drop tees, baffle walls, ~vers, grease trap, septic tank, leaching pools) 6) Die testing ~mplet~ on ~ confirmed proper routing of kitchen and sani~ waste lines (date) ~ yes ~ no 7) Comments WWM-084 (8/05) Page 1 of 2 C. Recommendations And Results (Check applicable items): 1. Sewage System a. I"~ System(s) functioned properly at time of inspection and is adequate for the proposed use. b. System(s) is not adequate for the proposed use (explain and make recommendations in Section D below or attach separate report). c. Other a, <" Water supply is adequate for proposed use (if private well, attach recent water analysis), b. __ Water supply is not adequate (explain and make recommendations in Section D below or attach a separate report). c. Other D. Other Comments/Recommendations: ~c4.A-/'~vl ,~-'~1~:~ I~V,CI 12. / )~1~ I Certification: The results and recommendations found in this,l~_~ ~ ~/_t :1 ~1~ ~ ~ · report are based upon my evaluation and inspection of the above referenced property: ~ Signature ~/'--'~--'- '~ T~/~. Date ~/~' Phone ~5! Mailing~'d~ress: Street IZ/,~ ~-~/¢/ ,~ ~. ¢ ~¢< Hamlet ~c~/ State ~ Disclaimer: This inspection repo~ indica~s the present condition of ~e private on~ite subsu~ace se~ge disposal system and ~ter supply based on recommended inspection procedures. The resul~ of this inspection do not guarantee or warran~ future pe~o~ance. The recipient of this repo~ should discuss any deficiencies found by ~is inspection ~th the individual ~o prepared the repo~. ~-084 (8/05) Page 2 of 2 SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)- 765- 9015 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (631)- 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD James King - President Southold Town Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: SCTM #: 1000-56-07-02 Mill Creek Restaurant & Marina October 10, 2006 Dear Mr. King: At per a request from your office, I have reviewed the proposed drainage shown on the Site Plan for the above referenced project. The drainage calculations provided do not appear to address storm water run-off beyond what actually falls on the building. Even ifthis permit application is directed only at the reconstruction of the restaurant, the surrounding pavement and/or sidewalk access areas used by the facility should be included in the drainage design. Currently, run-off from this Site sheet flows off of the existing pavement areas down to the state road and ultimately enters the mouth of the creek through drainage structures adjacent to the existing bridge. It is therefore recommended that additional drainage be installed to contain all run-off leaving the site. Some of the parameters needed to achieve this goal may be the installation of curbing and the construction of landscaped buffer areas at the perimeter of the site. This matter will also become an issue when and/or if the Planning Board has the opportunity to review this project. It is recommended that the Engineer for the project provide a revised site plan with spot elevations, contours and/or site profiles to indicate all existing run-off patterns. It is also recommended that the drainage design be revised to provide drainage structures or other such means that may be necessary to contain all surface water run-off on site and out of the adjacent wetland areas. Additional items that should be considered are as follows: 1. An LWRP Consistency determination should be required. A New York State DOT Curb Cut Permit should be required. Page 1 of 2 James King - President, Board of Trustees Re: SCTM #: 1000-56-07-02 Mill Creek Restaurant & Marina October 10, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Existing parking appears to be inadequate. It has been suggested that the adjacent easterly property will become part of this Site Plan. If this is a true, additional drainage should be provided. This parcel should also be inspected and the existing wetlands on this adjacent parcel should be flagged and noted or indicated on the site plan. It would appear that the wetlands on the adjacent property has already been encroached upon to store boats and provide overflow parking for the site. This matter, where related to parking, should also be addressed by the Planning Board. This Site Plan indicates the proposed reconstruction of a restaurant which no longer exists. Previously, the Town has made a determination that once a Non-Conforming Use, Setback or other Code Requirement has been removed it must receive all approvals as if it had never existed. Due to the fact that this structure has been totally removed and to be consistent with past Town policies, apl non-conforming issues should be addressed byall appropriate agencies. Therefore, it would appear that the Zoning Board of Appeals should be part of the process and must provide the following approvals; (1) A Special Exception for USE in this Zoning District, and (2) Approvals of the Setback from the Existing Bulkhead. If you have any questions concerning this Site Plan review, please feel free to contact my office. CC: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Patricia Finnegan, Town Attomey nes A. Richter, R.A. Ruth Oliva, Chair Person, Zoning - Board of Appeals Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Jerilyn B. Woodhouse; Chair Person - Planning Board DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID O. GR.~AM, M.D., M.P.H. October 24, 2006 Jim King, President Southold Town Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mill Creek Restaurant Dear Mr. King: We have reviewed the documentation on the Mill Creek Restaurant existing sanitary system and find it acceptable for use without upgrade. Please be advised that while the Office of Wastewater Management will no longer be involved in this project, the Food Unit of the Health Department must still issue a permit for the use of the kitchen. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (631) 852-5700. Very truly yours, Walte~ Chief Office of Wastewater Management 0C7 2 6 2006 (9) A statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the Town that may result by reason of such proposed operations. (10) A statement describing any known prior operations conducted on the premises in question and whether any prior licenses or permits have been issued to erect structures or to dredge or deposit fill on said premises and whether any such permits or licenses were ever revoked or suspended by a govemmental agency. (11) Documentary proof of permits that have been applied for, are pending, and have been granted, including but not limited to NYSDEC, Suffolk County Health Department, USACOE. (12) A description of how the proposed activities will be mitigated, including erosion control, replanting and restoration, designated points of access. All proposed operations will be clearly defined on a survey and described in a project narrative. The Trustees reserve the right to require specific replanting and restoration methods. Any replanting and restoration guidelines shall be in keeping with guidelines set by the Town of Southold. (13) Current photos of the subject area showing the proposed area of operations from at least two opposite directions. Each photo should be labeled with the date, time and direction. The location of the photos shall be noted on the survey, project plan or provided on a separate sketch map. (14) Drainage upgrade. At the discretion of the Board, nonadministrative applications may require submittal of a drainage upgrade plan. This plan must indicate how all existing and proposed on-site drainage from a two-inch rainfall is retained within the subject parcel landward of the wetland boundary. Retention can include but is not limited to infiltration or impoundment. All drainage plans shall show the calculations used to develop the plan. At the discretion of the Board said plans may require certification from a licensed engineer. (15) All permit applicants shall submit to the Board of Trustees an affidavit signed by the owner of the project property which indemnifies and saves harmless the Town of Southold from any claims arising out of or connected with operations under the permit and from all acts, omissions, commissions or negligence on the part of the applicant, his agents or employees, in such form as shall be approved by the Town Attorney. (16) An ethical disclosure statement as provided by the Town of Southold relating to applications for permits and other governmental requests. (17) A statement indicating that submission of false information will result in rejection of the application and may subject the applicant to criminal sanctions. (18) A completed Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency Assessment Form. [Added 10-11-2005 by L.L. No. 17-2005] B. Waiver of certain requirements. The Trustees, upon request of the applicant for a permit, may waive, in whole or in part, the provisions of Article II, § 275-6A(8), (11), (14) or § 275- 1 lA(2) where it finds that the nature of the proposed operations is such that the requirements of such provisions are not necessary for a proper consideration of a permit application. The resolution providing for the waiver shall clearly indicate why the waiver was granted. § 275-7. Fees. A. Every application for a permit filed with the Clerk shall be accompanied by a filing fee of $250, which includes the first site visit, no portion of which shall be refundable. The fee for an administrative permit shall be $50. For structures that have been previously built without a permit, the fee will be doubled. Ifa preapplication site visit is requested, the fee shall be $50. [Amended 10-11-2005 by L.L. No. 17-2005] Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5291 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President August 10, 2006 Ms. Heather Cusak Southold Town Trustees Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 AUG 1 5 2006 Situate: SCTM #: PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC s/s Route 25; Arshamomogue Town of Southold, New York 1000 - 56 - 7 - 02 Dear Ms. Cusak, In regards to the project at the parcel referenced above, please find the following enclosed herewith: Amended Survey of subject pan:el prepared by Hands On Surveying last dated 7/24/06 (two [2] copies). Kindly review the enclosed items. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you as always for your attention and consideration. Sincerely, William J. Lohn Encl. Cc: R. Principi Board of Trustees 65 June 21,2006 no more questions, I make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Second. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: All in favor? ALL AYES. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I will now make a motion to approve the application of Allison Byers to replace the existing timber sheathed bulkhead along the eastern section of the property with vinyl sheathing, reinforce the same with rock armor according to the plans handed in today, Page 1,2, and 3 dated June 21st. MR. ANDERSON: Thank you very much TRUSTEE KING: Second. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: All in favor?. ALLAYES. 15. Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of PRINClPI PROPERTIES, LLC requests a Wetland Permit to construct a new two-story restaurant over the existing foundation of what was a restaurant with second-story living space. Located 64300 Main Road, Southold. SCTM#56-7-2 TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Is there anyone here to speak on behalf of the application? MR. ANDERSON: I know you're familiar with this. I don't think there's much more to say only that I'm stating for the record we were coming back with all the odds and ends left over, which there was a lot to do. ~ation before ~,ou relates to. only the restaur~Dt. -We will b~-com~ng back- for bulkheads, bulkhead returns, there's ~loing to be a planting plan establj~h¢~JoL~ I'm hoping to '~esign a Iow profile bulkhead that will follow the shoreline on the east and west and pull out the brick that's presently there to stabilize that embankment. I would like to redo all the docks so they are brought up to code, that they're functional, that they're better suited than they are today. I'd like to dredge the inlet. So there's a lot to do here. When I come back to do next, there's going to be more agencies involved including the Town's Planning Board, Town's Zoning Board, DEC, Army Corps, Department of State. I am here to advise you that's what I intend to do. If for some reason I am not working on this anymore, I will let you know that. But the restaurant is really all we're here to discuss today. There was, always has been an apartment above, your notice speaks to the apartment. It doesn't matter to me if you are here to rule on that today or whether we come back. You can leave that back, I'm perfectly happy with that because that's going to involve a special permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I'd like to leave it off because right now Board of Trustees 66 Jne 21,2006 it's not allowable in the code. You can have the second story, you won't have to come back for us when you do the living space because you're not expanding on the building. You will have to go to building and zoning. So I'd like to take that part off the application. MR. ANDERSON: I agree. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: What about your septic? MR. ANDERSON: We have --the approvals aro still in force. These are approvals for 188 seats, believe it or not, that's what that current septic is designed for. It includes the grease traps. The use of this is going to be far less than what it's historically designed for. It's already in the ground. It's between the building and the road. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: And it's fully functional. MR. ANDERSON: Fully functional. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: What about drainage; do you have dry wells on this survey? MR. ANDERSON: I don't know if I do, but I'm perfectly happy to add those. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes. I'd like to see those on here. I'd like to see as many as you can. MR. ANDERSON: We can give you a two inch rainstorm and calculate that out and engineer it the way commercial site plans are supposed to be engineered. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: That would be groat. So we'll take off the section on the second-story living space that is not included in this. So I'll read it quickly. It's a Wetland Permit to construct a new two-story restaurant over the existing foundation of what was a restaurant with the existing septic system that is fully functional and dry wells. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Can I add a couple of things? TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes, I was just going to ask. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: This is M27 MR. ANDERSON: Yes. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: It says on M2 when you're reconstructing or building a marina, and are we talking marina here? MR. ANDERSON: I'm sorry? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: The line I'm getting to is when you reconstruct or build a marina, the Town code says you have to build a pump-out station. MR. ANDERSON: I would think you should have a pump-out station. I would anticipate that you would require one. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I don't see it here. MR. ANDERSON: That application hasn't been filed. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: What it says is construction of new or Board of Trustees 67 June 21,2006 additions to existing marinas, shall require establishment of a pump-out facility. MR. ANDERSON: Again, I'm coming back because we have a problem with the number of slips and everything else, and I anticipate that as a requirement. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: This is not an addition, so to speak, because he's putting the same size structure that was there before. MR. ANDERSON: This is just the restaurant. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: But he's building a whole building, you can't say it's nothing. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I'm not saying it's nothing. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I just think it's an opportunity to get it in now, so let him get it in now. What are we going to say next, he has all the docks in there already. MR. ANDERSON: John, let me be clear, we are going to completely redo the docks. In '92, your last record goes back to when Dean Blakey operated it, and there were -- I don't remember the numbers, but for the sake of argument there were 20 slips and now there's more like 40. So this thing went from 20 to 40 over a 15 year -- 14 year period with apparently no paper approval record. So one of the things I have to do is come in and fix that. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I understand. One of the things I'd like to see that get in it in now. MR. ANDERSON: Well, you're going to get it anyway. TRUSTEE BERGEN: John is saying let's put it in now. MR. ANDERSON: Put it in now, probably what you would have is a hand-held. But I don't know that right now, the only thing I'm hesitating is there's any employees there to service the marina. It's more like people just sort of dock their boats there. I don't know who's going to be operating it right now is what I'm saying. TRUSTEE HQLZAPFEL: That's something to work out. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Since you have to include the dry wells and everything, you have to include it on these plans. MR. ANDERSON: What you're going to see is that, like we have a brick trove, it's like a wheelbarrow and really what you're looking for is an area where it connects to the septic system. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: No. From boating, the Town is going to spend $85,000 now for a pump-out boat. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Minus the grants. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: The government is investing $90,000 for a pump-out boat, and we are making a sacrifice, and this is an opportunity to put a pump-out station in a marina that Board of Trustees 68 une 21,2006 there isn't. That's all I'm trying to get across. MR. ANDERSON: I'm fine with that. What does it look like on a plan; is it an area that's designated? MR. MCGREEVEY: Where does it get pumped into? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: It doesn't get processed there. Usually you call up and have it taken away. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: They have a holding tank and they have a service come. MR. ANDERSON: You want like an underground receptacle? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: No. Some of them have little portable tanks too. What you said before. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Portable, almost a hand cart, a self-contained tank. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: If I bring my boat up to the marina and say I need to pump out, you need to have a facility to accept it. It's nothing major. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Cutchogue Marina has one, New Suffolk has one. MR. ANDERSON: The one we use in Brick Cove, there's a boat that they use and also a wheelbarrow and I believe that goes into their own septic system, but I could be wrong. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: You're wrong about that. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Are there any other comments from the audience, from the Board? MR. JOHNSTON: Are all the Trustees familiar with the language? TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I'll read it. it says construction of new marinas and additions to existing marinas shall require establishment of pump-out facility for vessel sanitary waste, and that's for commercial docks, marinas, yacht clubs and restaurants, and it says and restaurants. It's Section 97-27 (2) commercial docks, then in parentheses marinas, yacht clubs, restaurants. All right, I make a motion to close the public hearing. TRUSTEE KING: Second. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: All in favor?. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I make a motion to approve the request for a Wetland Permit to construct a new two-story restaurant over the existing foundation of what was a restaurant with the condition that we get a new survey showing the dry wells to contain all roof runoff; and, as I stated before, the septic system is functional, and also to have a pump-out station as per code on the plan and -- MR, MCGREEVEY: Jill, parking area pervious? TRUSTEE DOHERTY: You know, that's a good point I believe it Board of Trustees 69 June 21,2006 is now, isn't it? And it's asphalt already, so the dry wells -- the drainage for the whole property so not just the restaurant. MR. ANDERSON: I would suggest we do the dry wells for the building. We have to go through a whole site plan review. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: The Planning Board will address the drainage on that. I have already spoken to them and the Building Department, actually this part does not have to go to Planning Board, it goes to the Building Department, and I spoke to Mike Verity, and he is also addressing draining. MR. MCGREEVEY: It is also a concern. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes, it's a concern with the Building Department. And the one section behind the bulkhead, on the east side, there's nothing there right now just sand; what is planned there for plantings? MR. ANDERSON: The bulkhead should be extended at least another 10 or 12 feet on both sides and there should be a return. When they did the bulkhead work, again, without a permit, which we have to correct, in my opinion, it's not even done properly, so you're going to see that. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I'm talking not directly behind the bulkhead but on the east side of that building, the little corner. This area here, there's nothing there right now. MR. ANDERSON: I don't think we have any plans for that. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I don't want to see any hard surface or grass there. MR. ANDERSON: Gravel or -- TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Gravel or plantings, just like a buffer area. I don't want lawn. We don't want lawn all the way over here. MR. ANDERSON: Why don't I then, I'm going to revise this and send it back for dry wells and so forth. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes, this is all subject to revised plans. MR. ANDERSON: You want a designated area in here and say nonturf area? TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Yes. And the other area there's no area to put in turf. TRUSTEE KING: That was pitched and graded towards the bulkhead too. You have to be careful. MR. ANDERSON: You remember, Jimmy, the bulkhead's not even done properly. It's going to be disturbed again. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I want it on this permit as well. You come in with the bulkhead, we'll probably say the same thing. I'll read it again. Wetland Permit to construct a Board of Trustees 70 June 21,2006 new two-story restaurant o~he ¢~ foundation of ~hat was ~taurant, the east side will be a nonturf ~-~}f~tTttlere will b~a~r~a~i-on and d~ wells to ~~ run~ ~ ~,, ?~ n~w ~howi~ thb ~v~ions. ~HNSTON: Jill, can I ask you to put the reference for the code section, so we're clear where in the code section. 2B, and use the same language, the establishment of pump-out facility for vessel sanita~ waste. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I mad it the fimt time. MS. CUSACK: Jill, is there any protection during construction like you can't put hay bales because I don't think there's any space, but maybe run a silt fence. There's going to be a lot of construction there. TRUSTEE KING: There's not going to be ground disturbance. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: It's all there. MS. CUSACK: They did put down hay bales when they did the foundation originally. MR. ANDERSON: I don't know whether you care, there is also the feature if you look at that foundation, we're going to have to fill that to grade, which entails pu~ing about 18 inches of gravel in the cavity, bring it up to grade, then we're going to have to put in what's called hydrostatic openings to comply with the FEMA regulations, which will be rated in one inch per one square foot to comply with the FEMA regulations. Poking holes in that, I don't know if you want to regulate that but so you know, that's something that's going to come about as a result of the building permit process. Right now it's not even constructed to code. TRUSTEE KING: Long ways to go. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Do I have a second? TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Second. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: All in favor? ALL AYES. 16. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of GREGERSEN'S KEEP, LLC requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' by 34' fixed elevated catwalk with steps secured with 6" diameter pilings, 3' by 15' hinged ramp, and 6' by 20' floating dock secured with 6" diameter pilings. Located: Gull Pond Lane, Greenport. SCTM#35-3-12.6 TRUSTEE KING: Is there anyone here to speak on this application? MS. MOORE: You're very familiar with this property. I know you've seen it in the last couple years between the subdivision and the development permits. We are proposing a Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Main Street, EO. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5198 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President Via Telecopier and Regular Mail November 3, 2006 James King, President Southold Town Trustees P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mill Creek Inn Situate: Route 25, Southold NO'¢ - 6 2006 Dear Mr. King, As you know, this Firm represents Mr. Principi and the Mill Creek Inn who are seeking to re-build the existing restaurant over its existing footprint. This Firm was retained by Mr. Principi in March of this year and on March 21, 2006, Mr. Principi and I met with the Town's Building Inspector to outline the required steps in obtaining a Building Permit to re-build the restaurant within its footprint. We were informed that an approval from your Board was required. On April 26, 2006, a full application to re-build the restaurant was forwarded to your Board. Subsequently, it was discovered that the docks had been rebuilt using treated lumber and were different in size and number. On April 26, 2006 the application was withdrawn and a new application, expanded to address the restaurant and marina related concerns, was filed with your Board. Also, the applicant removed all of the treated limber associated with the docks and replacing them with non-treated lumber. Subsequently, we were advised that high marsh vegetation was cleared from the property. On April 21, 2006, I met with the full Board on site to review and discuss the alleged violations. A Re-vegetation Plan dated May 16, 2006 was prepared and submitted to your Board. On May 30, 2006 1 received correspondence from you directing me to revise my application for restaurant and bulkhead, only. The planting plan was returned to me and the marina related activities were dropped from the application. On June 21, 2006, your Board approved the re-construction of the restaurant subject to the installation of drywells, and a non-turf buffer off the southeastern comer of the restaurant to be re-constructed. On August 10, 2006 revised survey were filed with your office consistent with the conditions of permit issuance. On August 28, 2006, I met with Heather Cusak, staff to your Board who informed me that the Health Department would have to "OK" the septic system. This, I do not recall being part of any decision made by your Board, although my memory is not always perfect. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Principi submitted the final approval of the Health Department for the previous restaurant and an engineering certification prepared by Lawrence Tuthill, which documentation certified the adequacy of the septic system. Still the requested permit did not issue and so Mr. Principi met directly with the Health Department. By correspondence from Walter Hilbert, P. E. Chief, SCDHS Office of Wastewater Management to you dated October 24, 2006, the septic system was declared to be acceptable for use without upgrade. Still no permit issued. I am now in receipt of correspondence from James Richter, R. A. to you dated October 10, 2006, which correspondence contradicts the your Board's regulatory decision of May 30, 2006, your Board's approval of June 21, 2006 and the determination of the Building Inspector which only required receipt of your permit in order to issue the requested Building Permit. I am sympathetic to runoff concerns identified in Mr. Richter's correspondence but note that Mr. Richter has no jurisdiction over the instant application. Similarly, Mr. Richter can not establish jurisdiction of other agencies in this matter. I again request that your issue the wetland permit. I am authorized by the applicant to commence preparation of a larger site plan which plan will require approvals of the Town's Planning Board, Zoning Board, Health Department, NYSDEC and your Board and suggest that Mr. Richter's concerns be addressed within that process as appropriate. I make myself available to discuss this matter with the Board during its next work shop although I do not know what more I can contribute to the issue at hand: the issuance of the permit for the re-construction of the restaurant as already approved by your Board on June 21, 2006. Please let me know if further discussion is required. Bruce A. Anderson Cc. R. Principi James F. King~ Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John HoIzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 30, 2006 Mr. Bruce Anderson Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 2003 Bridgehampton, NY 11932 Re: PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC 64300 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 56-7-2 Dear Mr. Anderson, The Board of Trustees is in receipt of an application for the above referenced property. The Board is able to process the application for reconstruction of the previously existing restaurant and the bulkhead seaward of the restaurant. We are advised that any increase in the number of boat slips from those that were previously permitted requires a site plan through the Building and Planning Departments. Accordingly, please revise your application to reflect the reconstruction of the restaurant and bulkhead only. Please contact this office with any further questions. Very Truly Yours, JamesF. ngh~ ~" ,~ President, Board of Trustees JFK/hkc PATRICIA A. FINNEGAN TOWN ATTORNEY patricia.finnegan (a town .southold.ny.us KIERAN M. CORCORAN ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY kieran.corcoran(, town.southold.ny.us LORI HULSE MONTEFUSCO ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY ]ori.montefusco(. town.southold.ny.us SCOTT A. RUSSELL Supervisor Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1939 Facsimile (631) 765-6639 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To' From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Ms. Heather Cusack, Environmental Techn an :..~ Lr; [~ ,. Trustees Office ~' - Kieran M. Corcoran, Esq. Assistant Town Attorney May 17, 2006 MM 17 2006 Principi Properties/Trustees Application As discussed in our meeting this morning with Pat Finnegan and Mark Terry, you explained that this proposed project involves, among other things, a bulkhead replacement in-kind, additional dockage and rebuilding of a restaurant and related buildings. As it appears that this project when viewed in total will need site plan approval, it is required that the SEQRA and LWRP review be coordinated with the Planning Board (and/or the ZBA if applicable). Accordingly, it is our advice that the applicant be requested to submit applications to the Planning and Building Departments before a review of the entire project reaches any advanced stage. As also discussed, there appears to be no impediment to proceeding with the in-kind replacement of the bulkhead or the in-kind replacement of the dock with Code-compliant materials. KMC/Ik cc: Mr. Mark Terry, Acting Department Head, Planning Department Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq., Town Attorney May I0, 2006 May I0, 2006 Cusack, Heather From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Semon, Bruno Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:34 AM Cusack, Heather Edwards Ken (E-mail); George Solomon (E-mail); Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail); Joseph Townsend (E-mail); Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail); Terry, Mark RE: Principi Project-Old Mill Creek Inn site-Trustees/Site Plan I think it would be great if all Town Departments coordinate approvals for this project. has been made on this project. Thanks for the update. Bruno At this time no site plan application James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Board of Trustees Field InspectiordWorksession Report Date/Time: ~// Name of Applicant: Name of Agent: Property Location: SCTM# & Street Brief Description of proposed action: Se of area to be impacted: altwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland SoUnd Front Bay Front Distance of proposed work to edge of above: P~t~CC of Town Code proposed work falls Under: hapt.97 ~Chapt. 37 other Type of Application: V/Wetland __Coastal Erosion __Amendment __Administrative __Emergency Modifications:h~ Conditions: Present Were:,f~J.King '~J.Doherty __P.Dickerson 4. Serge~___J.Itolzap fel Other: ~)on~ ~ Mailed/Faxed to:' Date: Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southotd, New York 11971-0959 CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., May 10, 2006, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Peter Young, seconded by Jack McGreevy, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH A CONDITION of the Wetland, Permit application of PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC to construct a new restaurant with second story living space over the existing foundation of what was also a restaurant with second story living space; reconstruct two small outbuildings in their original locations; install 24 floating docks yielding a total of 48 slips; existing fencing and gate along the eastern property line; and remove ACQ decking inadvertently installed on floating docks and replace with non-treated wood. Located: 64300 Main Rd., Southold. SCTM#56-7-2 The CAC recommends Approval of the application with the Condition all areas between the structures and the water are pervious, and drywells and gutters are installed to contain all roof run-off. Vote of Council: Ayes: All iVIotion Carried MILL CREEK INN Situate: s/s Ruute ~>; Ars~amomogue; Town of Southold, New ~1 SC'TM#: 1000 - 50 - 7 - 02 Photos ~l~ 4¥6/2006 Photo taken from the northern portion uf snbjeet parcel facing ~onthwest showing the e~stlng fonn&tion uf the old biill Creek Inn. Please note that this foundation ~11 b~ utihz~d for the reconstn~ction. MILL CREEK INN ~ltuate: s/s Route ~; Arshamomogue; Town o~ Southohl~ New ?~ orh SC Iii#: 1000- 56- 7 - 02 4/6/2006 Photo taken from the nord~ern portion of subject parcel facing south showing the existing eartl~ and stone driveway leading to the so.thorn extremity o~ sugject parcel. Please note the existing bulhheaded marina ia the le~ poaion of the photograph. Said markta w~ remain unchanged ~om cu=ent con&ions as a rest~lt o~ th~ p~oposal. MILL CREEK INN Sit~ate: s/s l~oute 25; Arshamomogoe; Town of Southold, New York SCTM#: I000 - 56 - 7 - (t2 Photos ta,~e,, 4/6/2006 Photo taken from the northern portion of suhiect parcel facing southwest shorting the e×~stlng boat basin. Please note the ex~stlng btdkheaded marina in the nfiddl~ potion of the photograph. Said madn~ wall remain unchanged from current cond~tlons as a result of the proposal. MILL CREEK INN Situate: s/s Route 25; Arsl~amomogue; Town of Sot*thol& New Y0rle ~CIM#: 1000- 56- 7 02 PJ, otos ~a~e. 4/6/2000 Photo taken fzom the existing asphalt parldng area facing south showing a closer view of the existing foundiatiom MILL CREEK INN Situate: s/s Route 25; Arshamomogne; Tmvn of Southold, New York SC: I ~ 1#: 1000 - 56 - 7 - 02 Photos ~aJ~en 4/6/2006 Photo taken t~rom the west side ot~ sttbject parcel facing east~ showing the west s~de of the exlst-lng ~oundation and the approximate location of the "1 Story Frame Buildln~" slao~m on tt~e survey that will be reconstructed ~n place. MILL CREEK INN Situate: s/s Route 25; Ars[~amomogue; Town of Soutbold, New Y0rl~ SCTM#: 1000- 56- 7- 02 4/6/2006 Photo taken from tk~ northern portion of subject parcel facing southeast showing the existing boat hakim Please note the existing bulkheacled m~rina in th~ mld~e potion of the photograpt~. Said marina w~ remain unchanged gorn cu~ent conditions as a result of tke proposal. MILL CREEK INN Sittlate: s/s Route 35; z~rshamomogue; Town of Sonthold, New Yorle SCT~¥1#: 1000 - 56 - 7 - 02 Pl~o~o~ ~. 4/6/20o6 Photo taken from the southernmost portion of stxbject parcel facing north existing bo~t b~sin ami found~tlon. Pl~as~ not~ th~ ~stlng bulkh~ded m~n~ in th~ middle potion of tt~e photograpt~. Said manna will remain unchanged from cumeat conditions as a result o~ the proposal. MILL CREEK INN ~qituate: s/s ~(mte 25; ~rs}~amomo~ue; '[own of Sm~thold, New Yo~k SCTM#: 1000- 56- 7- 02 Photos ~[~,~ 4/6/2006 Photo t~k~n f~mn the e×istln~' earth and g~,~wl d~4vew~y f~clng northwest showlng the exlstlng found~tlon of the old Mill Creek Inn and the existing ~oundatlon of the fi-~me budding that wdl he reconstructed. MILL CREEK INN ~tu~t~,: ~/~ [~oote 25; ,4~'~h~n'~omoO~e; To~¥~-~ o~ ~o~old~ New Yeah SCTM~: [ 000 - 56 - 7 - 02 P~olos ~ale~-~ 4/0/20(h5 Photo taleen from the existing ear~J~ and stone clrlveway f~eing west, showing a closer view o~ the exls6ng tToundation o-f the frame building that MI1 ge Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Main Street, EO. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5198 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President Via Telecopier and Re~lular Mail James King, President Southold Town Trustees P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mill Creek Inn Situate: Route 25, Southold Dear Mr. King, November 8, 2006 Please schedule the above referenced permit matter for the work session portion your regular meeting of November 15th, 2006. Bruce A. Anderson Cc. R. Principi Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main StreeL P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5291 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President July 18, 2006 Mr. James King, President Southold Town Trustees Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Situate: SCTM#: Mill Creek Inn Main Road; Town of Southold, NY 1000 - 56 - 7 - 2 JUL 2 Dear Mr. King, As you know, this Firm represents Principi Properties, who has received approval for improvements to the property referenced above. Accordingly, please find enclosed a check in the amount of $50.00, payable to your order to cover requisite fees. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office at any time. Thank you in advance for your attention and consideration. Sincerely, Diane K Wassick encl. cc: Mr. Principi James King, President Jill Doherty, Vice President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Hohapfel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1823 office Use only Coastal Erosion Permit Application X Wetland Permit Application Grandfather Permit Application Waiver/Amendment/Changes __Received Application: Received Fee: $ Completed Application Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Coordination: (date sent) CAC Referral Sent: ~ Date of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Report: Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: / Public Hearing Held: Resolution: - MAY 3 1 2006' Name of Applicant Principi Properties, Address 8595 Cox Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: ;.LC Phone Number( ) 1000 - 56 - 7 - 02 Property Location: s/s Route 25; Arshamomogue; Town of Southold (provide LILC0 Pole %, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Address: P.O. Box 2003 Bridgehampton, NY 11932 Phone Number: (631) 537-5160 Fax: #(631) 537-5291 Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area ( in square feet) : 3.009 acres Area Zoning: Marine II Previous use of property: Marina/Restaurant w/ space. floor living Intended use of property: Marina/restaurant Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date Southold Town BD NO prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? No X Yes If yes, provide explanation: Stop work order was issued for changes to docking facility. Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : ADpllcant proposes to construct a new 2 story restaurant over the existing foundation of what was a restaurant w/ 2n~ story living space (the old Mill Creek Inn). Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Applicant proposes to construct a new 2 story restaurant over the existing foundation of what was a restaurant w! 2n~ story living space (the old Mill Creek Inn). Area of wetlands on lot: Percent coverage of lot: 0 (wooden bulkheads) square feet N/A % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ±0 (wood docks & ramps) feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands:4~ feet Does the project involve excavation or filling: X No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? N/A cubic yards How much material will be filled? N/A cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: N/A feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: N/A Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: N/A Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): Situate wetland degredation will be minlmized by use of siltation fencing and hay bails during construction. Please note that situate wetlands are existing wooden bulkheads. Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA **N/A** Purpose of Proposed Activity: Are wetlands present within 75 No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? feet of the proposed activity? (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from the implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to f'r~ a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: P~t 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ I Part1 ~ I Part2 ~ IPart3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by ProJect Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full FAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action PRINCIPI Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) s/s Route 25; Arshamomogue; Town of Southold, New York Name of Applicant/Sponsor Bruce A. Anderson/Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Address P. O. Box 2003 City / PO Bfidgehampton State NY Zip Code 11932 Business Telephone (631) 537-5160 Name of Owner (if different) Richard Principi Address 8595 Cox Lane City / PO Cutchogue Business Telephone (631)734-2410 State NY ZipCode 11935' Description of Action: Applicant proposes to construct a new restaurant w/2nd story living space over the existing foundation of what was also a restaurant w/ 2nd story living space (the old Mill Creek Inn). The applicant proposes to reconstruct two small outbuildings in their original locations (labeled "1 story frame building" and "frame building" on the survey. The applicant proposes to install 24 floating docks yielding a total of 48 slips (original approval was for 16 floating docks yielding 32 slips). The applicant proposes to gain approval for previously installed fencing and gate along the eastern property line (used to control access to the gravel driveway). The applicant proposes to remove ACQ decking that was inadvertently installed and replace with non-treated wood. The applicant proposes to rebuild the existing bulkhead immediately seaward of the existing foundation in kind/in place. Please note that the situate bottomland is privately owned by the applicant. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban r"l Industrial [] commercial [] Forest r~ Agriculture [] Other ]Residential (suburban) ~] Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESENTLY 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres ] .34 acres 0.38 acres 0.15 acres acres AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 1.34 acres 0.38 acres O. 15 acres acres What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: [~Well drained 100 % of site ]Poorly drained % of site [~]Mederatelywell drained %of site. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see I NYCRR 370). outcroppings on project site?~ I Yes [] No 4, Are there bedrock a. What is depth to bedrock 1000 +/- (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~']0-10% 100% ~']10- 15%__% Lr"-~ 15% or greater % 7. 8. What is the depth of the water table? 3 +/-(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?. ~ Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Is project substantiall_hL_contiguous to, or contain a building, district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? ~ Yes [] No site, or Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes ~']No [~No ~'~ Yes ~---~ No Page 3 of 21 1 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is ident fled as threatened or endangered? Accordin~l to: ISite inspection on 4/27/2006 E~Yes [~No Identi~ each sDecies: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geolecJical formations? [~Yes [~No Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r-]Yes [~]No If ~/es, explain: I 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [~Yes r~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: I Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Boat Basin (please note that bottomland is privately owned by applicant) Peconic Bay b. Size (in acres): Boat basin: 1.34 acres Southo d Bay: 2881 +/- acres Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [] Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? r~No J~iYes J~"JNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? E]Yes [~No 19, Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 r-'~yes [] No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [~Yes B. ProJect Des~iptJon 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.15 acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0. t3 acres, d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. __ f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 20 +/-; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially 0 0 0 Ultimately 0 0 0 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 27' +/- height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e, rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? [~] N/A E]Yes ~]No If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed 3.009 acres. 0.15 acres ultimately. N/A % 0 10 +/- (upon completion of project)? ]No 71' +/- width; 167.17 ft. Condominium 0 122' +/-length. 0 tons/cubic yards, b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No 4, How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I--'lYes [] No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: __ 7. If multi-phased: b. d. 9 months, (including demolition) Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month year, (including demolition) Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I----I Yes I'--1 No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes Iai No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 25 +/-; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes [~l No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I [ Yes imlNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 1 3. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? r~ Yes ~l No Type Standard Septic Tank and Leaching Ringll 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [~ Yes [--I No If yes, explain: J The area slightly as a result of the extra floating docks. water surface will decrease 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 1OO year flood plain? [~lYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~l Yes I~ No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 12 tons b. f yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used'~ r~ Yes [] No --]No c. if yes, give name Southold Refuse ; location Route 48; Cutchogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [] Yes I~No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~lYes ~']No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I~Yes r~ No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes ~l No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [] Yes ~l No 2t. Wilt project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) Typical energy uses for a restaurant of this size. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1500 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board F"] Yes [~ No City, Town, Village Planning Board r~ Yes r']No Site Plan Approval Food Service Permit Sanitary System Approval Southold Trustee Wetlands Approval City, Town Zoning Board J~l Yes J~J No City, County Health Department r~ Yes [~]No Other Local Agencies [~Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies J'---J Yes JTJ No State Agencies r-=] Yes [~ No Federal Agencies r~J Yes J~J No Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? J'~JYes If Yes, indicate decision required: r-'l zoning amendment r~ site plan r--j No E] Zoning variance J~J Special use permit J---J New/revision of master plan r"J Resource management plan J~ Subdivision r~ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Marine 11 3. What is the maximum potential deve opment of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Lot size (square feet) 80,000; Lot width (feet) 150; Lot depth (feet) ! 50; Front yard (feet) 35 [ Side yard (feet) 25; Both side 50; Rear yard (feet) 25 Landscape area (percent) 20; Lot coverage (percent) 30; Building height (feet) 35; Number of Stories 2 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? same as existing. 5. What is the maximum potential deve opment of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? r~Yes [] No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~ mile radius of proposed action? Business to the west and residential to the east. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~'] Yes F~ No Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~ Yes ~1 No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ~]Yes r~No If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a, if yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic, r'-lyes ]Yes ~'1 No []No D. InfommUonal Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may he any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. F. Yerifk~ation I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ApplicantJSponSOrsignat~~ .Name _~.~~Bruce . Ande n Date 5/15/2006 Title Senior Environmental Analyst If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a sta~ agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this Page 10 of 21 Town of $outhold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, lhe Planning Depai~tment, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 56 07 02 MA'[ 37 200 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate respond):, _. '~ ' ' Town Board [] Planning Dept. [] Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees [] 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Applicant proposes to construct a new restaurant over the existing foundation of what was a restaurant ~/ 2'''~ story living space (the old Mill Creek Inn). Attach additional sheets if necessary Location of action: Site acreage: s/s Route 25; Arshamomogue; Town of Southold~ NY 3.009 acre Present land use: Marina/restaurant w/living space above Present zoning classification: Marina II If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Principi Properties~ LLC (b) Mailing address: 8595 Cox Lane Cutchogue~ NY 11935 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( 631 ) 734-2410 (d) Application number, if any: N/A Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No [] If yes, which state or federal agency? NYSDEC DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This proposal maintains the development scheme of the Town of Southold, which is "defined bY a pattern of open agricultural land interspersed with development clustered around a number of historic hamlet centers...', by utilizing an existing site. The proposed use is operatively the same as the existin.q use (marinn & restaurant). The proposal will also preserve open space as there is no development planned that did not exist before the Mill Creek Inn was demolished. The proposal will make efficient use of infrastructure by utilizin.q the existing bullheaded marina. This facet also makes beneficial use of the project's coastal location. As the site has been previously developed, the proposal "minimizes the adverse effects of development." Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This area of Southold Town has historicc]lly been utilized as a hub for var¥in.q water dependent uses. In the recent past, restaurants have become a pad of this scheme as well. The Mill Creek Inn combined both those uses. The proposal is simply to revive that mixed use. Subject parcel and the surrounding aren cannot be considered si.qnificant archaeolo.qical resources. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Please note that an attempt had been previously made to salvage the fagade of the Mill Creek Inn building. That attempt was not successful. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 5 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The si.qnificant scenic resources in the Town of Southold "are defined by traditional patterns of development that were based on a.qriculture, the stron.qest visual element in Southold, and maritime, activities." The subject parcel has been in water dependent use for many years, as have the westerly adjacent parcels. A return to this type of activity at subject parcel will restore an integral piece of land alon.q this section of Route 25, and bring it into visual harmony with the surrounding area which is also in marina/restaurant use. More simply, the proposed structure and subsequent aesthetic improvements will "enhance visual quafity..." by eliminating a partially improved lot in the midst of numerous developed lots. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subiect parcel has been in the use that is proposed and has housed structures very similar to those proposed for many years. During that time, no loss of life or natural resources has occurred, and only limited loss of structures has occurred as a result of flooding and erosion. The proposal will simply restore those basic conditions of the site. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The proposal is simply to restore the basic conditions to the site that have existed for many years. Durin.q that time, the site and its operation did not have any adverse impact to the water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. The proposal will also add wastewater and storm water mana.qement devices that are up to current code. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The proposal is simply to restore the basic conditions to the site that have existed for many years. Durin.q that time, the site and its operation did not have any adverse impact to the local ecosystems. The proposal will also add wastewater and storm water management devices that are up to current code. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The proposal is simply to restore the basic conditions to the site that have existed for many years. Durinq that time, the site and its operation did not have any adverse impact to the local air quality. The proposed restaurant will be outfitted with compliant filters and exhaust systems thereby Iowerin.q the airborne. emissions from the site. In addition, none of the airborne emissions from the site will be toxic in nature. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets it' necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This policy is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve disposal and/or transportation of solid waste, hazardous waste, toxic pollutants, petroleum products, Attach additional sheets if necessary PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This proposal will "promote appropriate and adequate physical public access and recreation to coastal resources" by utilizin.q the existin.q bulkheaded marina which has and will continue to provide public access to dockin.q facilities. This facet will also help to "preserve the public interest in and use of lands and waters held in public trust by the state and the Town of Southold' and "assure public access to public trust lands and navi.qable waters." The "access and recreation" that is proposed will not adversely effect natural resource value in the Town of Southold as the proposal will utilize an existin.q bulkheaded marina that did not adversely impact natural resource value. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependence uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The proposal "protect existin.q water dependent uses" by utilizin,q the existin~l bulkheaded marina. More importantly, the proposal will "improve the economic viability of water dependent uses by allowin.q for non-water dependent accessory uses, particularly water enhanced and maritime supported services whern sufficient upland exists" by restoring1 the restaurant accessory use which will be accompanied by partial marine service. This will allow for the continuation of the east end stable of travelin~1 to a dinner via boat. The proposal will also "minimize adverse impacts of new and expandin.q water dependent uses..." by utilizin.q an existin.q s te Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town Waters. See LWRP Section 111 - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This policy is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve any form of marine resource mana.qement (i.e. commerciol fisheries, recreational fisheries, aquaculture, etc.. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evalUation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This policy is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve a.qr cu tura lands (i.e. the conversion of farmland, the establishment and/or maintenance of new coasta a.qr cu tural production, etc...) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for '~aluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable ~ This policy is not applicable in that the proposa~ do~knot involve the conservation of ener.q¥ resources on a commercial level and/or the promotion of alternat v6~,ener.qy sources, proper maintenance of fuel stora.qe facilities and/or the extraction of mineral extraction ~ Attach additional sheets if necessary Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5291 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President HAND DELIVERED May 15, 2006 Mr. James King, President Southold Town Trustees Town Hall P.O. Box l 179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Situate: SCTM #: PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC s/s Route 25; Arshamomogue Town of Southold, New York 1000 - 56 - 7 - 02 Dear Mr. King, As you know, this Firm represents the owner of the above referenced property. At this time, we wish to amend the application before your Board to include just the construction of the proposed restaurant (with no living space above). To that end, please find enclosed herewith: 1) Amended Town of SouthoM Board of Trustees Wetlands Application; 2) AmendedLocalWaterfrontRevitalizationProgramConsistency~lssessmentForm. Kindly add these documents to your files and maintain our position at the next regular meeting of your Board. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please feel free to contact this office at any time. Sincerely, William J. Lohn Encl. Cc: R. Principi Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5291 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President Via Telecopier and Reft. ular Mail May 17, 2006 James King, President Southold Town Trustees P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC Situate: s/s Route 25, Southold SCTM # 1000-56-7-2 Dear Mr. King, I have been informed that the above referenced matter has been the subject of extensive discussions and meetings as to how our application should be processed. Apparently, there is a belief that the proposed actions (i.e. the re- building of the restaurant and the addition of madna slips by a prior owner) constitute unlisted actions pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act CSEQRA"). There is further belief that an illegal segmentation would occur if our application were not to be treated in this fashion. I believe that the undisputed facts are as follows: A restaurant with apartment above historically existed which restaurant received permits from both the Trustees and Building Department to reconstruct the foundation in-kind and in-place. A marina historically existed on the premises which marina received a permit from the Trustees to "grandfather permit docks at Mill Creek Inn as shown on survey". The survey shows the boat basin with attendant bulkheading and 16 finger piers. The number of finger slips increased and the increase took place prior to the purchase of the property by Principi. The increase in finger piers require a permit from the Trustees and so an application was made with the Trustees to grandfather the increased number of finger piers thereby removing a violation. {617.5(c)(2) defines the "replacement, rehabilitation or reconstruction of a structure..." as a Type II Action. {617.5(c)(7) defines the construction or expansion of a pdmary or accessory/appurtenant, non-residential structure or facility involving less than 4000 square feet...' as a Type II Action and the sum total of the finger piers is far less than 4000 square feet. {617.5(c)(29) defines "civil or criminal enforcement proceedings whether administrative or judicial...' as a Type II Action and the filing of the permit application for the increased number of finger piers is the administrative process for the resolution of a violation. Type II Actions are not subject to SERQA pursuant to {617.5(a). Therefore, no "coordination process" exists for the applications filed with your agency. {617.2(b)(ag) defines segmentation as "the division of an environmental review of an action such that various activities or stages are addressed under this part as though they were independent, unrelated activities needing individual determinations of significance", but no individual determinations could be made in this instance because none of the actions are subject to SEQRA and thus no determination of significance can be made. Therefore, there is no concept of segmentation that can be applied in this matter. By way of this correspondence I request that your Board take no action (coordination or otherwise) on this application until this matter has been reviewed by the Town Attorney. I also believe that it is in the interest of both the Town and the Application that our application be processed expeditiously so that the existing eye sore that characterizes the property can be remedied as the Building Inspector has determined that no site plan approval is required in order to reconstruct the restaurant with apartment above. ~~-Bruce A. Anderson- Cc. R. Principi K. Corcoran (via fax and regular mail) Principi Properties, LLC SCTM#56-7-2 1. Permit was issued to repair the existing foundation under an existing restaurant, not for a new foundation. 2. The grandfathered permit is only for 15 floats, not the 24 that are now there. 3. The application is for an as built and requires the additional $250 fee. 617.5 (c) The proposed construction of the restaurant and 2 sheds is more than 4000 sq. feet. Use of CCA decking for reconstruction. Permit not in Mr. Principi's name Baccharis bushes cut back along shoreline. Distance of restaurant to water. Parking requirements. Impact of increasing number of slips. Drainage for building and parking lot. VIOLATIONS Re-built bulkhead without a permit Re-built docks without a permit CCA wood used Baccharis cut and 5 trees removed 2 sheds placed within 100' of wetlands At residence: placed 20cy. fill within 100' of wetlands TRANSMISSION VERIFIOATION REPORT TINE NAME FAX TEL SER.# 85/15/2886 13:24 BOARD OF TRUSTEES 7656641 6317656641 BROA4J177281 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT NODE 85/15 13:24 928492848711 88:88:88 88 BUSY STANDARD BUSY: BUSY/NO RESPONSE PATRICIA A. FINNEGAN TOWN ATTORNEY patricia.finnegan@town .southold .ny .us KIERAN M. CORCORAN ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY kieran.corcoran@town.southold.ny.us LORI HULSE MONTEFUSCO ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY lori.montefusco@town.southold.ny.us SCOTT A. RUSSELL Supervisor Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1939 Facsimile (631) 765-6639 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Wickham, Brcssler, Gordon and Geasa 13015 Main Road, P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 May 1, 2006 Re: Town ofSouthold v. Richard Principi Ticket # A4676 Dear Ms. Geasa, After our conference and adjournment on the last court date, April 28, 2006, I went to 64300 Rte. 25, Greenport to investigate Mr. Principi's claim that the lumber used was ACQ and not CCA as charged in the above-referenced ticket. Please find enclosed a sticker that I found attached to the new lumber at the location which indicates that the wood used was, in fact, treated with CCA in violation of the Town Code. It is difficult to reconcile Mr. Principi's claim that the wood was authorized, given the cautionary stickers affixed to the numerous 2 x 6 pieces that comprise the docks warning of the arsenic and stating "treated with CCA.' It certainly appears that Mr. Principi was attempting to purposely mislead his attorney and presumably, the Court with respect to this matter. Please inform your client that the lumber must be removed immediately, or he faces additional charges for the continued presence of the environmentally hazardous material. Please call me if you care to resolve the case before the next Court date, May 19, 2006. Sincerely, Lori Huls~Montefusco Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold ;wash and separately Treated with Chromated Copper Arsenate Consumer Informafl~)n This wood has been con[alnm~ inorgan~ from treated wood into surroundin, may also be dislodge~ with skin. ExRosure t, Certain hazarUs. Take uses involvin( of the smoke and ashes. commercial(continued on back wood James King, President Jill Doherty, Vice President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1823 Office Use only Coastal Erosion Permit Application X Wetland Permit Application Grandfather Permit Application Waiver/Amendment/Changes ~Received Application: q/~H~IQ~ .-~Received Fee: $ ~r ~-~Completed Application~6[~o Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Coordination: (date sent) ./CAC Referral Sent: ~1~1~ .~ Date of Inspection: %~!Q~C~ Receipt of CAC Report: Lead Agency Determination: ~,~Technical Review: Public Hearing Held:~.~k~~ ~esolution: ~)~ ~-'~ Name of Applicant Princi~i Pro~erties~ LLC Address 8595 Cox Lane Cutcho~ue, NY 11935 Phone Number( ) Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 56 - 7 - 02 Property Location: s/s Route 25; ~trshamomo~ue; Town of Southold (provide LILC0 Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Suffolk Environmental Consultin~ Inc. Address: P.O. Box 2003 Brid~eham~ton! NY 11932 Phone Number: (631) 537-5160 Fax: #(631) 537-5291 Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area ( in square feet) : 3.009 acres Area Zoning: Marine II Previous use of property: Marina/Restaurant w/ 2nd floor living space. Intended use of property: Same Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Southold Town BD Southold Town Trustees Date Permit#: 4079; 9/25/1992 No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? No X Yes If yes, provide explanation: The Southold Town Board of Trustees issued a stop work order for the construction of the proposed restaurant as a result of alteration to the floatin~ dock assemblies without a~ermit. Project Descri (use attachments if necessary) A~licant proposes to construct a new restaurant w/ 2nd sto~ living space over the existing foundation of what was also a restaurant w/ 2~ stor~ living space (the old Mill Creek Inn). The applicant proposes to reconstruct two small outbuildings in their original locations (labeled ~1 stor~ frame building" and "frame building" on the survey. The a~plicant proposes to install 24 floating docks ~ielding a total of 48 slips (original approval was for 16 floating docks ~ielding 32 slips). The applicant proposes to gain a~roval for previously installed fencing and gate along the eastern property line (used to control access to the gravel driveway). The a~licant proposes remove ACQ decking that was inadvertantl~ installed and replace with non-treated wood. Please note that the situate bottomland is privatel~ owned b~ the a~licant. 3 Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: A~plicant ~roposes to construct a new restaurant w/ 2~ stor~living space over the existing foundation of what was also a restaurant w/ 2n~ story living space (the old ~till Creek Inn). The applicant proposes to reconstruct two small outbuildings in their original locations (labeled ~1 storx fr--A building" and ~tframe building" on the survey. The applicant proposes to install 24 floating docks ~ielding a total of 48 sli~s (original a~roval was for 16 floating docks yielding 32 slips). The a~plicant proposes to gain approval for ~reviousl~ installed fencing and gate along the eastern property line (used to control access to the gravel dri~wa1~). The applicant proposes remove ACQ decking that was inadvertentl~ installed and r~lace with non-treated wood. Please note that the situate botto~land is privately owned by the a~licant. Area of wetlands on lot: 0 (wooden bulkheads) .square feet Percent coverage of lot: N/A % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~0 (wood docks & ra~s) feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands:O± (floating docks) feet Does the project involve excavation or filling: X No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? N/A cubic yards How much material will be filled? N/A cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: N/A feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: N/A Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: N/A Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): Situate wetland de~re~ation will ~ minimized b~ use of siltation fencing and ha~ bails during construction. Please note that situate wetlande are existin~ woo~n bulkheads. 4 Purpose of Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA **N/A** Proposed Activity: Are wetlands present within 75 No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? feet of the proposed activity? (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from the implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) 5 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Principi Properties~ LLC SCTM# 1000- 56 - 7 - 02 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustess to: At~plicant proposes to construct a new restaurant w/ 2~ stor~living space over the existing foundation of what was also a restaurant w/ 2"d stor~ living space (the oldMill Creek Inn). The a~licant proposes to reconstruct two small outbuildings in their original locations (la~led "1 stor~ fram~ kmailcling" and ~frm~ builclin~" on the survey. The applicant proposes to install 24 floating docks yielding a total of 48 slips (original a~roval was for 16 floating docks yielding 32 slips). The applicant prognoses to gain approval for previousl~ installed fencin~and gate alor~ the eastarnproperty line (used to control access to the gravel driv~way). The applicant proposes remov~ AC~ dackin(~ that was inadv~rtentl~ installed and replace with non-treated wood. Please note that the situate botto~uland is privately o~edb~ the applicant. 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: s/s Route 25; ;trshamo~oc~ue; Town of Southold! NY 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment. You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME: Princi~i Properties! LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 8595 Cox Lane Cutcho~ue, NY 11935 PHONE # (631) 734-2410 Enc.: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. 6 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: 56-1-4.1 Harold Reese 56-7-1 Goldsmith's Boat Shop 24 Whitehall Road Rockville Center, NY 11570 P.O. Box 1436 Southold, NY 11971 56-4-21 Richard Saetta 56-4-24 Edwin Tuccio STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK P.O. Box 2047 Greenport, NY 11944 193 Griff'mg Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 William J. Lohn , residing at 2322 Main St.; New~-n Village Suite E; P.O. Box 2003; Brid~eham~ton~ NX 11932 , being duly sworn deposes and says that on the ~ day of ~,~-{\ , 20 6~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notide set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Brid~eham~ton , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. ~ Sworn to/efore me this / ~ Notary Public 7 Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk ) State of New York ) William J. Lohn BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT{S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT{S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVE(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. SWORN BEFORE ME THIS /~ary Public ~ DAY OF ~ 20 O~-~ Matlhew D. Ivans Notary Public o1 New York No. 01[V6053859 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires January 22, 20 O ~ Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-529 I Bruce Anderson, M.S.. President May 5, 2006 Mr. James King, President Southold Town Trustees Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 MAy - £oo6 Re: Situate: SCTM #: PR1NCIPI Property s/s Route 25; Arshamomogue Town of Southold, New York 1000-56-7-02 Dear Mr. King, As you know, this Firm represents the owner of the above referenced property, who is seeking approval fi.om your Board to construct a restaurant, and make changes to the docking facility thereon. This matter is on the agenda for the regular meeting to be held on May 17th, 2006. Therefore, in accordance with Town Code, please find enclosed herewith for your review: 1) original signed and notarized ~lffidavit of Mailing; 2) copy of the Legal Notice that was mailed to adjaeent property owners; 3) original Certified Mailing Receipts and copies of the same. Kindly review the enclosed items. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you as always for your attention and consideration. William J. Lohn Encl. Cc: R. Principi PROJECT ID NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I- PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQRA 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR I 2. PROJECT NAME Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. ] PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipalit~ Southold Count,/ SuffoLk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map) s/s Route 25; Arshamomogue; Town of Southold, NY 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Am)liasnt prom)sas to construct a new raslaurast w/2~ sto~ livin~ soace over the exislir,:I foundation of what was aled a restaurant w/2." story Iislm) soace (the old Mill Creek Inn). The am)ii(ant 0rm)oaas to reconsfnx;t two small o~thuildinqs in their oriqinal Iocedoas 0abeted '1 story fTame buildim)" and 'frame buildias" on the sur~ev. The am)ii(ant oroeasas to install 24 floai~3 docks vieldim) a total of 48 slias (ohqinal approval was for 16 floedm) docks vieldim) 32 slim)l, The az)oliasnt oroom)as to (~ain amxoval for ~)reviouslv iastelled fendnq and qate alonq the eastern prope~ line lused to conlml access to the eravel driveway). The aoolicant i)rm)oass remove ACQ deckir~ that was inadvertenlly installed and mglace with non- lreated wood, Please note that the situate bottomlaed is e~vateN owned by the applicanL 7. AMOUNT OF LAND EFFECTED: Initially .12 acres Ultimately .12 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes [] No lfNo, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN V1CINITY OF PROJECT? [-]Residential [-]Industrial []Commercial []Agriculture [-]Park/Forest/Open space []Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes [~No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals NYSDEC 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes [] NO l CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: William J. Lohn- Suffolk Environmental Consulting;, Inc. Date: 4/25/2006 Signature~ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART !1- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by A~ency) IA. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE 1 THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. [] Yes f-] No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? lfNo, a negative deciar~inn may be superseded by another involved agnn~y. Ii I~1 Yas []No (~. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (A~wem may be handwritten, if legible) C 1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality, noise levels, existing b~affic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archeological, historical or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhoodcharaeter? Explain briefly: ~5 ~ ~1541>~iC~ (~'1o~,~ C3. Vegetation ot fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitat, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or change in usc or intensity of use of land or natural resources? Explain briefly: \}e~ , IC~L/L0.C..fa~ <~ ~f)~- .~i,/o£ CS. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be indaced by the proposed action? Explain briefly: C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C 1 -C57 Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts (including changes in usc of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain briefly PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adveree effect identified above, de~rmine whether it is substantial, large, important, or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in eonncedon with its (a) setting (i.e. uthan or rural); (b) probability of oceumng; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (c) geographic scope; and (0 magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adcquatety addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to thc FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name of Leed Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different From responsible officer) Date Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5291 Bruce Anderson. M.S. President HAND DELIVERED April 26, 2006 Mr. James King, President Southold Town Trustees Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re-' Situate: SCTM #: PRINCIP1 PROPERTIES, L L C s/s Route 25; Arshamomogue Town of Southold, New York 1000 - 56 - 7 - 02 Dear Mr. King, As you know, this Firm represents the owner of the above referenced property, who is seeking all required regulatory approval to construct a restaurant and outbuildings over the foundations that formerly supported the Mill Creek Inn, and to maintain the existing conditions in the bulkheaded marina. Accordingly, approval fi.om your Board is required (please note that an application was previously filed regarding this matter. This application was withdrawn via correspondence fi.om this Firm dated 4/26/2006). To that end, please find enclosed herewith: 1) Completed $outhold Town Board of Trustees Wetlands Permit Application (original and two [2] copies); 2) Short Environmental Assessment Form (original and two [2] copies); 3) Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency Assessment Form (three [3] copies); 4) Location Map (three [3] copies); 5) Photographs of subject parcel (two [2] sets); 6) Survey of subject parcel depicting all existing and proposed improvements prepared by Hands On Surveying last dated 4/28/2005 (original and [2] copies); 7) Check in the amount of $250.OO to cover the requisite application fee. By way of this correspondence, kindly commence review of this application and schedule for the first available meeting of your Board. Please be aware that the situate bottomland is privately owned by the applicant. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you as always for your attention and consideration. Sincerely, William J. Lohn Encl. Cc: R. Principi r-i Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) r"l Restricted Deltve~ Fee [3" (Endorsement Required) Postage (Endorsement Required) ]J · 5 2~re (Endorsement Required) Certified Fee (t--'ndomemont Required) I Here Tot~: r'ost~go & ~,~ ~.6~ 05105106 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southo d agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 56 - 07 02 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board [] Pianning Dept. [] Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees [] 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Avo/icant oroooses to construct a new restaurant w/ ~ story/iv/no s~3c~ over 11~ eziso3o tound~tion of w~t w~ ~1~ a ~u~nt w~ ~ ~ l/vino ~ f~ gd Rill ~ Inn). ~e a~i~nt v~ to ~ ~ mall ~ilgn~ in ~r ~oi~l I~nn~ {la~ "2 ~ ~ ~ildino" a~ '~a~ bui~i~" on t~ m~v, ~ a~i~nt ~ ~ i~l124 flmb~ ~ vi~i~ a ~1 of ~ gi~ (~oi~l amwl wa~ ~ 15 ~ ~ ~i~ 32 ~i~, ~ ~nt ~ ~ ~in a~va/~nre~o~vi~a//~ ~e~ and ~ a/~ ~ e~ ~ li~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ nra~ d~wavi. ~ a~i~nt ~ ~ A~ ~ ~t was i~v i~//~ ~ m~a~ ~ ~-~t~ ~ ~am ~ ~ ~e ~te ~la~ is ~telv o~ by ~e a~i~n~ A~ach additional sheets i[n~c~ss~ Location of action: Site acreage: s/s Route 25; Arshamomol~ue~ Town of Southold~ NY 3.009 acre Present land use: Marina/restaurant w/living space above Present zonin~ classification: Marina Il If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Principi Properties, LLC (b) Mailing address: 8595 Cox Lane Cutchogue~ NY 11935 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( 631 ) 734-2410 (d) Application number, if any: N/A Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No [] If yes, which state or federal agency? NYSDEC DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This proposal maintains the development scheme of the Town of Southold, which is "defined by a pattern of open aaricultural land interspersed with development clustered around a number of histo~c hamlet centers...", by utilizin.q an existin.q site. The proposed use is the same as the existin~l use (marina & restaurant w! livin.q space above). The proposal will also preserve open space as there is no development planned that did not exist before the Mill Creek Inn was demolished. The proposal will make efficient use of infrastructure by utilizin.q the existinq bullheaded marina, with addition of eight more floatin.q docks lhan was oriainall¥ approved. This facet also makes beneficial use of the project's coastal location. As the site has been previously developed, the proposal "minimizes the adverse effects of development." Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section 11I - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This area of Southold Town has historically been utilized as a hub for varyin.q water dependent uses. In recent east, restaurants have become a part of this scheme as well. The Mill Creek Inn combined both those uses. The proposal is simply to revive that mixed use. Subject parcel and lhe sun-ounding aren cannot be considered si.qnificant archaeoloqical resources. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with lhis policy. Please note that an attempt had been previously made to salvaqe the facade of the Mill Creek Inn buildingl. That attempt was not successful. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 5 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The si.qniticant scenic resources in the Town of Southold "are defined by traditional patterns of development that were based cJn oqriculture, the stronqest visual element in $outhold, and maritime activities." The subject parcel has been in water dependent use for many years, as have the westerly adiacent pgrcels. A return ta this type of activity at subject parcel will restore an inte.qral piece of land along this section of Route 25, and brinq it into visual harmony with the surrounding area which is also in marina/restaurant use. More simply, the proposed structure and subsequent aesthetic improvements will "enhance visual quality...' by eliminating a partially improved lot in the midst of numerous developed lots. In addition, thn proposed dockinq facility will look the same as what exists now. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject parcel has been in the use that is proposed and has housed structures very similar to those ~ro~Dosed for many years. During that time, na loss of life or natural resources has occurred, and only limited loss of structures has occurred as a result of floodin.q and erosion. The proposal will simply restore thosn basic conditions of the site. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The proposal is simply to restore the basic conditions to the site that have existed for many years. Durin.q that time, the site and its operation did not have any adverse impact to the water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. The proposal will also add wastewater and storm water manaqement devices that arn up to current code. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southoid ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section llI- Policies; Pages 22. through 32 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The proposal is simply to restore the basic conditions to the site that have existed for many years. During that time, the site and its operation did not have any adverse impact to the local ecosystems. The proposal will also add wastewater and storm water manaqement devices that are up to current code. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The proposal is simply to restore the basic conditions to the site that have existed for many years. Duringl that time, the site and its operation did nol have any adverse impact to the local air quality. The proposed restaurant will be out[itted with compliant filters and exhaust systems thereby lowednq the airborne emissions from the site. In addition, none of the airborne emissions from the site will be toxic in nature. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section 11I - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This policy is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve disposal and/or fransportalion of solid waste, hazardous waste, toxic pollutants, petroleum products. Attach additional sheets if necessary PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section 1II - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This proposal will "promote appropriate and adequate physical public access and recreation to coastal resources" by utilizJnq the existinq bulkheaded marina which has and will continue fo provide public access to dockin.q facilities. This facet will also help to "preserve the public interest in and use of lands and wafers held in public trust by the state and the Town of Southold' and "assure public access fo public trust lands and naviqable waters." The "access and recreation" that is proposed will not adversely effect natural resource value in the Town of Southald as the proposal will utilize an existing1 bulkheaded marina that did not adversely impact natural resource value. Please note that the situate bottomland is privately awned by the applicant. Therefare, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependence uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable The proposal will "protect existinq water dependent uses" by utilizin.q the existinf:l bulkheaded marina. More impodantly, the proposal will "improve the economic viability of wafer dependent uses by allowing tar non-water dependent accessory uses, particularly water enhanced and maritime supported services where sufficient upland exists" by restofln~l the restaurant accessory use which will be accompanied by iDartial marine service. This will allow for the continuation of the east end stable of traveling to a dinner via boat. The proposal will also "minimize adverse impacts of new and expandinq water dependent uses..." by utilizin~q an existingl site. Therefore, we feel that the proposal is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets i f necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town Waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This policy is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve any form of marine resource manaaement (i.e. commercial fish,ties, recreational fisheries, aquaculture, etc...). Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Sonthold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This policy is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve aglricultural lands (i.e. the conversion of farmland, the establishment andJor maintenance of new coasta aqr cultura production, etc...) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section 111 - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable This policy is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve the conservation of energy resources on a commercial level and/or the promotion of alternative enerav sources, proper maintenance of fuel storaae facilities andJor the extraction of mineral extraction Attach additional sheets if necessary A-4130 Town of Southold Suffolk County, NY The People of the State o! New York vs. ~~~T' COPY A'4131 Town of Southold Suffolk County, NY The People of the State of New York vs. COURT COPY Southold Town Police Incident Report Report 04/12/2008 11:35 Case Number 01-08-002636 Case Number I Report Occurred On/From Occurred To 01-08-002636 104/12/2008 11:35 04/12/2008 11:35 04/12/2008 11:35 Incident Type Case Status Case Status Date TOWN CODE VIOL.-OTHER CLOSED-NO ARREST (ADMI 04/1212008 IlL Common Name MillCreek Marina - 64250 ROUTE 25 GREENPORT, NY 11944 (SUFFOLK County) ~ -- Sector: 3 803 Map Reference: GPT4 Location Typ~ CONSTRUCTION SITE Sector: 3 803 Report Type Odginal C eared Total Damaged Property Value: $0.00 Total Stolen Property Value: $0,00 Total Recovered Property Value: ~0.00 O State Classification F TOWN CODE VIOL-OTHER F I Statute/Ordinance E ~ Stc275-16 N Federal Classification (Larceny Only): Not Applicable (-) ISF IAttack ReasOn: NO BIAS/NOT APPLICABLE (')_ Location Type CONSTRUCTION SiTE IAttempted/Committed COMPLETED Disposition Date Federal Disposition: CLOSED O State Classification Attempted/Committed F TOWN CODE VIOL.-OTHER COMPLETED F Statute/Ordinance Location Type Disposition Date E ~) STC 275-16 CONSTRUCT ON S TE N~- ~Attack Reason: NO BIAS/NOT APPLICABLE (-) Federal Disposition: CLOSED s E P Pemon Type Business/Person Name Business Phone E COMPLAINANT (CO) Southold Town Board of Trustee's 631- R Home Phone Person Address Map Reference S~l (631) 765-1892 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 , SUFFOLK County O ~ Other Phone Employer Address N Race Sex ISSN I DL Exp. Date I DL Number Birth Date Birth City Arrest Number: 01- - Person Type Business/Person Name Business Phone ARRESTEE/DEFENDAN~ Richard Principi (631/ 734-2410 Home Phone Person Address Map Reference (631) 734-2410 8595 Cox LN Cutchogue, NY 11953, SUFFOLK County Other Phone Employer Address 8595 Cox LN Cutchogue, NY 11953, SUFFOLK County Race Sex IssN I DL Exp. Date I DL Number WHITE Male Birth Date , Birth City 09/26/1962 Age: 45 Arrest Number: 01- - Adult/Juvenile: ADULT Employer: South Point LLC Reporting Officer Department Report Status: Sbc Donald Dzenkowski (2068) SOUTHOLD TOWN POLICE Approved Officer Name Date/Time Verifying Officer Department Date / Time SGT RAYMOND E. VAN E3=rEN (8885) SOUTHOLD TOWN POLICE 04/12/2008 15:37 1 of 2 Southold Town Police Incident Report Report 04/12/2008 11:35 Case Number 01-08'-002636 · Topic Odginal Richard Principi was issued summons numbers A4130 and A 4131 for placing a deck and floating dock within 100' of a tidal wetland contrary to the Trustee permits that were issued Reporting Officer Department Report Status: Sbc Donald Dzenkowski (2068) SOUTHOLD TOWN POLICE Approved Officer Name Date/Time Verifying Officer Department Date I Time SGT RAYMOND E. VAN ETTEN (8885) $OUTHOLD TOWN POLICE 04/12/2008 15:37 C 2 of 2 o ~'4684 Town of Southold Suffolk CoUnty, NY 'i~e People of the State of New York vs. ~ld ~Y /~! [] TOYOTA 0 VOLKS O ' _. -- - "/--,"' COURT COPY 1 Agent. ~ . ~ ] 2. Dw,slon/Prec,nct N~/york ~1[~ 30RI 4 ~Or~g 5 Case No. 6 Incident '~: . de y~ 17 Dusiness Name 18 WeapOn(s) A 19. Inci~nt Addr~ (Street No. Street Na~, Bldg. NO., Apt. NO.) 20 Cl~, State, Zip (~ O !~ :~ 23. NO. of Victims -- C 2 24 NO. of Suspems D. ~ ; 65. Veh Yr 66. Make 67 Model 68. SWIo 69. VIN ~ ~DMV ~ Want/Warrant [JScoff]aw ~ B ~ ~ Rep~n~l~gna~lu~e R~ 78 ID No 79. Sup .... 's Sgnatur. (Include Rank 80 ID No sheet [ ~ [ ~ Status ~ OpPn C osed (l~losed, check box be[ow) [; U-~founded ....II 82 Status D~le 83 Nohh~d T~T Page I ~ ~: ~:~: ~rr:est- Juv [: Ofender Dead : Extrad Declin :Unknown I J Pages DCJS-3205 (10/03) *FALSE STATEMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CRIME, PURSUANT TO THE NEW YORK STATE PENAL LAW. ' -$ ',gO.I '~ ~W~ ~ ' ' 3(~O 5 CaseNo. 8 ncden No ~..epo~ Day 8. Date 9 Repeal Time ~ 10, Day 11, Date 12. Ti~ 3 Day 14. Date ' ~5 T me 16, I~ident Type 17 Business Name '18. We~n{~s) I 19. Incident A~ress (Street NO., Street Name, BId~, NO.. ~t, NO.) ~. C~. S~te, Zip (~ C ~ T ~ V) 21. L~ation C~e 24 No. of Suspe~s D. H Status Full ~ - ., . alue , ' "~~'"~' ,~ ID No. 7g Supewiso,s Signature (Includ~ Hank) 80 ID No. u~ ~Op~n I ) Clo~ed (d Clo~d, ahe~k box b~lo~) ~ U~lo~d~ J 8~. 81atu~ D~ e ~ Notified/TOT P~ DCJS-3205 (10/03) *FALSE STATEMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CRIME, PURSUANT TO THE NEW YORK STATE PENAL LAW. A-5300 Town of Southold SuffolkCounty,. NY,. eoo~ " ~[:] ~o~ o 40. ' n e~s o ~ o s.w. COURT COPY \ 50U*rHOc'O ICOPY FOR INFORMATIONAL 'PURPOSES ONLY SUFFOLK COUUTY DEP/~RTU£NT OF HEALTH Fm Coad~u~ion Only H.O Ref No. ................... AUG 12 !~ ~ GATE Chit /-- S 89'52'00" E 49' 9&42' 2 STORY FRAME RESTAURANT 1 sTORY J LOT AREA. 131, 062 SQ.F'F = 3. 009 ACRES mo 15 8 0 SURVEY OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATE A T ARSHAMOMOGUE 15 3O SCALE: t" = 30' TOWN OF SOUTNOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. T.M. DIST. 1000 SEC. 56 SLK. 07 LOT 02 45 60 75 90 105 120 DATE: DECEMBER 3, 2004 135 PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC SROADWAY ASSTRACT JOB NO. 200~48§ MAPNO. FILED' REWSIONS: LICENSE NO. 050363 HANDS ON SURVEYING TI ~ NORTH ROAD /I · WAMPTON SAYS, NEW YORK . ~.,/I 'i'i946 '"~ TEL* (631)-723-1954 - F~:(631)-72~1329 I ' M~RTIND. HANDL S ~- ~J Route 25 Suffolk Enwronmental Consul~g, Inc. P,O. Box 200~ Bddgeham~on · NY · 11~2 PATE: M~y 16.2006 .~=A. LE: 1' ~ ~;0' DISOWN BY: COMMENT'S; 51~e Plan ~dap~ed ~om the survey, ofsub!e~ Wopei'ty as ?~ared by HANDS ON 5~R~ING: ?epa~ed and submi~ed ~r regulate MAY 17 2006 Baccharll h~UmiR)Ua L. Gro~ndsel-t~ee or -bush. P~cil-tree. A branching gla.brous ,.hr~b, 3'-~1o° high, the branch- ~\~!1]I~' I~te~ short-petloled or ~esstle, entire, or few-toothed .~.~t].. toward ~e apex; heads in peduncte~l clusters o~[ I-5, nous, al)pressed, the inn. er oae! oi the pisi41hto he,~l, s --I/ --'~ fram ~rth Carolina to Florida, and in Bermuda, ~ ecificatlons: Plan § ~- Five ($5) Total ~ Planted in ~mn Fly-HoneysucM~ Shrubby. 3'-$' high, the twig~ glabrous. Petioles ~'-3" long very sle~der leaves thin 1'-4* lo=g. bright green on both sides, ovate or coroila-~mb nearly regular, its lo'es short; berrie~ separate, ovoid, light red, about 2. thick. Connecticut, P~nn~ylvanin~. ~l~dinn~ Planting Specifications: Ten (~o) Torsi ~ Planted in One-Gallon PoRed Symbol: PROPOSED ON SITE DRAINA GE FOR BUILDING. BUILDING: 5,09'i Bet FT. 5,091 SQ. FT X 2" RAINFALL (0. t667') = 849 GU, FT. OF REQUIRED LEACHING AREA 849 GU. FT. / 42.24 ('1' DEPTH OF 8' DIA. RING) = 20.1' OF DEPTH PRO VIDE' (4) 8' DIA, X 6' DEEP L.P.'S FOR CONTAINMENT OF ROOF RUN-OFF TO BE COLLECTED VIA LEADERS & GUTTERS 15 8 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' SITE PLAN OF DESCRIBED PROPER'I SITUATE A T ARSHAMOMOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK B.C. T.~ DIS'£ IO00 SEC. 56 BLK. 07LOT02 15 30 45 60 7'5 90 '105 '120 DATE: DECEMBER 3, 2004 '135 S 89'52'00" E 95.42' 22.3' NON-TURF BUFFER 1r X5 74 Z 69.5' STEEL BEAMS m .J SOUNDINGS NOTED THUSLY X 0.0' ARE WATER DEPTHS AS REFERENCED TO LOW TIDE ELEVATION OF APRIL 26, 2000 DERIVED FROM ACTUAL BOTTOM OF BASIN ELEVATIONS TAKEN AT 11:00 AM ON APRIL 20, 2~00 LOW TIDE OF APRIL 26, 2000: +/- EL.: .0.3' +/. 4:30 AM HIGH TIDE OF APRIL 2~, 2006: +/. EL: 2.6' +/- ~0:40 AM WETLAND AREA( BOAT BASIN TO EDGE OF WATER) 50,494 SQ.FT. UPLAND AREA: 72,500 SQ. FT. = 1.06 ACRES BUILDING COVERAGE ( UPLAND AREA): 0,002 SQ.FT. = 0.3 % IMPERVIOUS SURFACES ( UPLAND AREA): 6,097 SQ.FT. = 9.2 % (ASPHALT PARKING LOT NOT INCL.) : 0,7~5 SQ.FT. LOTAREA: ~3~,002 SQ.FT. = 3.009 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: M-O ( MARINE 0) PROPERTY IS ENTIRELY LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE AE ( EL 0 ) AS DETERMINED FROM '/*tie FLOOD I~SURA~CE RATE MAPS (FIRM) PANEL #36103C0'159 EFFECTIVE DATE MAY4,'1008 ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO NGVD 1929 DATUM AND ARE THE RESULT OF ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENT. CERTIFIED TO: PRINCIRI PROPERTIES, LLC BROADWAYABSTRACT TO ACTUAL WATER DEPTH~ LICENSE NO. 050363 IIHANDS ON SURVEYING TI 46 NORTH ROAD . ii HAMPTON BAYS, NEW YORK '1'1946 TEL: (63'1)-723-1054 - FAX.(03'1)-723-1329 7 MARTIN D HAND L.S (STATE 15 8 0 SURVEY OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATE A T ARSHAMOMOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C.~ DIS[ IO00 SEC. 56 BLK. 07LOT02 15 30 45 60 SCALE: 1' = 30' 75 90 105 120 DA TE' DECEMBER 3, 2004 135 4 9'-- S 89'52'00" E 98 42' ' sTORY '~ ~1~' "sPACE = 3.(,'/ NEW cONC. FouNDATiON / TF. EL.:IO.7', // SLAB EL: 3.3 WD. WALK EL. 8. % t WD W~~A' J LOT AREA: 131,002 SQ.FT. = 3.009 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: M-II ( MARINE 9) PROPERTY IS ENTIRELY LOCA TED IN FLOOD ZONE AE ( EL 0 ) AS DETERMINED FROM THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRM) # 36 t 03C0~ 99 EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 4,1990 ELEVATIONS SROV~ HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO NGVD 1929 DATUM AND ARE THE RESULT OF ACTUAL RELD MEASUREMENT. ,CERTIFIED TO: PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC BROADWAY ABSTRA CT JOB NO. 2004-486 MAP NO. FILED: REVISIONS: ADD ELEV$. FOR PERMIT 1/29/05 LOC. NEW FOUNDATION 4/28/05 HANDS ON SURVEYING 46 NORTH ROAD HAMPTON BAYS, NEW YORK 11946 ' TEL. (631)-723-1954- FAX'(631)-723-1328 MARTIN D HAND I_ S 15 8 0 SCALE: t" = 30' SURVEY OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATE A T ARSHAMOMOGUE TOWN OF BOUTHOLD BUFFOI. K OOUNTY, NEW YORK B.C.'~M. DIST IO00 SEC. 56 BLK 07LOT02 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 DATE: DECEMBER 3, 2004 i35 MAIN (STATE e, od~ 13' W 15rw S 89°52'00"E 98.42' STORY spACE wOOD WD WALK // SLAB EL: 3.3' WOOD 69 5' STEEL BEAMS m 38, LOT AP, EA: 131,062 SD.FT. = 3.009 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: M-II ( MARINE 0) PROPERTY IS ENTIRELY LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE AE ( EL 8 ) AS DETERMINED FROM THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRM) # 30'103C0'i59 EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 4,1998 ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO NGVD 1929 DATUM AND ARE THE RESULT OF ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENT. CERTIFIED TO* PRINCIPI PROPERTIES, LLC BROADWAYABSTRACT JOB NO. 2004-488 MAP NO FILED: REVISIONS: ADD ELEVS. FOR PERMIT 1/29/05 LOC. NEW FOUNDATtON 4/28/05 H, N S O~ SURVEY NG TI 46 NORTH ROAD ' /I HAMnTO~BAYS, N~WVORK~./I ~4e '~ /I TEL: (63~)-723-1954 - F~,(63~)-723-132~ ~ /I MARTIN D. HAND L. 8 ~1