The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNoyes, Nicholas osuFra Jill M. Doherty,President � NCO P.O.Box 1179 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 6y Southold,NY 11971 James F.King ti Telephone(631 765-1892 Dave Bergen ,y T Fax(631)765-6641 John Bredemeyer !� Southold Town Board of Trustees Field I/nspection/Worksession Report O Date/Time: — ('0' t1 NICHOLAS NOYES requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to rebuild 600+/- sf. of wood patio deck including existing perimeter bench and new post supported cable rail. Located: Private Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#3-2-1 ($st-ems Typ f area to be impacted: altwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 _oth;C"oastal Type of Application: etland Erosion _Amendment _Administrative_E rgency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications:— Conditions: Prese Were: v'J. Doherty R+' B. Ghosio " J. King I/D. Bergen, Bredemeyer D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Peter Young,Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 1 T Fax(631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., June 15, 2011, the following recommendation was made: NICHOLAS NOYES to rebuild 600+/- sf. of wood patio deck including existing perimeter bench and new post supported cable rail. Located: Private Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#3-2-1 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. T DOCkO, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com May 3, 2010 NYS DEC Environmental Permits Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Noyes Family Property, Fishers Island Deck Reconstruction Chocomount Cove To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of Nicholas B. Noyes we request a Tidal Wetlands Permit including Water Quality Certifications, as necessary, for Deck Reconstruction on Fishers Island,New York. We enclose the following in support of this permit application: Four prints each of plans titled: Project: "Deck Reconstruction" Waterway: Chocomount Cove Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Applicant: Nicholas B.Noyes Date: April 25, 2011 • Four copies of the NYS DEC Joint Application, including the Short Environmental Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, Photographs, Location Map, and Project Narrative. • One copy of each application submitted to other regulatory agencies • Check in the amount of$200 for application fee. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOc'�4�4SoL— Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBNJm Enclosures CC: Nicholas Noyes Town of Southold: Doherty File: 09-08-2146 NOYES JOINT APPLICATION Wl" e , New York state FOR PERMIT , 1' ' United States Army Corps of Engineers Appicabb beaartteserdPwnNh�eppNetlrtetl ut am l.. Plerea Meal irNumonsanbah. Adam aedemw sywmetlw,assess Wass PM1N heaahr arhype. 1.Check peoples 4 Wled ton 2 MUM ofAppkWd aha SAN name) Telephone, Number (osyeme) Nre Dept.of Ewkersosntat Comeraaaon NICHOLAS NOYES 978-369-9708 ❑ Swem DNNrhonce(Bea and Banks) MON"Address 103 COOLIDGE ROAD ❑ NavipaMe Weeks,(Eawvatbn and FY) ❑ Docks.Moonnos or platoons POO ONlea Sw. Zb Cale (Conetructorpiaw) CONCORD MA 01742 Dmle and kof-rdman Spucw— 3.Tsap"J r m (tappawnt Is not an irdivMuM) (CON111114 Reconam+a Or Repair) - Freshwwbrllletwds J -•. Q Taw wedads 4.Appftwd is ah^^•n•�i: (ahea as mmy as apPiy) Coaxial❑ CoaxialEmaion Control f❑ Owner D operator ❑Leasse ❑Mmieipaity/Goeeammenw Ap.aey uYM,Swank and Recreational Rivers 6.NappswMle rrol6b owra,idanN'y awnertwa-otherwise, yw may proykle.AgataContes Parton MekaMtbn. 401 wales ous14 carmiasm OspterallSarhYioolrleal Person Owner E]Agent lConhd Person_.::Talephom Nsnmw (daytime) [] pohNawate Keith rSupoy DOCKO, INC.,Kei .Neilson,P.E. 860-572-8939 El Loam hardweas NNMM Addema Agcasc VdS twI n Comm) P.O.BOX 421 POW � ARuwftk,as Corer, MYSTITI0Ca Fish Control 6.Palled I FWW Lacallon (nosh klbaeun women. tee instruction Ia.) Nys owe of eeneeM swv wa Coster. TereamChvAlWape! Taa Mao SeCWW Bkak/La Number (Stab Owned Lands Ueda Wader) 'SUFFOLK FISHERS ISLAND 1000-003-2-1 Lease,License.Eaament or hohona Number fdavhnm other areaPreperhr Interest Loaslion IertlrsQero Stmf or Rom) Te tW*Easement(ppaWra;wnduite; EAST END ROAD 631-788.7816 cables ep) post 011ie Stab De,Cow 7.Naare of Sbaant pr wabelndy (on a eons Project ate) )OMS,Moorings or Plata me FISHERS ISLAND NY 06390 CHOCOMOUNT COVE (Conabucta Wwe).. Adirondack Park Annoy S.harm ofUM38 Cued Map: Location o ! u ❑ Fra/hwalar Wad nds Peme NEW LONDON-CT-NY-RI III p YTM-E 7� 58 �oZ W NYTM-E NYTM-N 4 ❑ wad.Smrlc and R.a.MkuN Rivers S.CmNM 060M Uon and Purynee:(CalepayofActhfge.g.newconstructladkutW.lion,m.kmmnw or nspklamrmk Typo of Bamboo or Aft* Wkhmd.draggIng.Ming,aeon,dock,hkirp of water; Type of Mates Less George park 6arnmbsbn and OMAN"• ShKk"and work Ames Dleeamimq;Need or purpose Bernd) oodea(Contra a Pew) Rebuild 600(4/-)SF of wood patio deck Including existing perimeter bench and new post-supported Cable rail,landward of the flagged tidal wetlands and the apparent Miwrso(F.Wish) high waterline. US Am6r Cap of EvVnsk , Setsori 404 Wits ers of the United States) Section 10(Rivas and Herb=A00 Nationwide Peon$(s) MeiheyNumbaKs) For Ageag the Ode' DEC APPLICATION NUMBER US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 11.sea PmIect Occupy.I IL Proposed Start 13. Estkmtaa Completion o O r �a Loretto Vale, C � 9/2011 10/2011 14,Has work Begun ae Project? (t yes, gnaw it.LNt Previous Psnnxy Appts:aeon NUMbM eon Dabs: gf Arry) er4lambon at why work was Mated wNww permk) rm No 16. WIN Oft PmJmd Rawk,Additional FM b eral, Sta .or Local Pamtsi O O List Town of Southold TT.If O Wleerd in seals awmr,bleb mud Wn the ap kshion I hereby sanm Seat"he"I d on WW'ded an taafann and a6 aYadrmahb a posSed ha nab is true le"beg Of my kno.Wp and boner. FSiee statements male harem ere punishable a a 4 Close A meMmsmr Pursuaa 10 Becton 310.45 of to POW Lew. Furtlror,tlp applioea aooepte fug reapaMbaky for at darnepe,deard W hosed, of whatever neWre.arld by whores e r su0ersd,scale%out of f Wood darmibad Brain and agrees b kdew*and sew harrrsess Uw State from was.echoes, Mnapss are Male of every rerm am tletapion reersleg fiorre Babe pro pcL in additm,Federal Law,18 U.S.C.,Section 10DI pmvvinfor a am of ner more gran $10,000 or yngisonmedfor not nlors Nan s years,or bath wheat an appSMA knowingly and wiWngy setae,corcesls,or covers up a mabnal tact or knowingly makes orq (als, rvudu: fsada Date natuAles T410 Date Signature Of Owner T 4 617.20 • SEQR ROJECT ID NUMBER APPENDIX C P STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only. PART 1 •PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed:by plicant or Project Sponsor) 1.APPLICANT I SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME NICHOLAS NOYES DECK RECONSTRUCTION &PROJECT LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK Municipality County 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addeas and Road Intersections, Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map OFF EAST END ROAD(SO CALLED) 5.15 PROPOSED ACTION: New Expensbn ©Modification/alteration 8.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Rebuild 6D0+/-SF of wood patio deck including existing perimeter bench and new post supported cable rail,landward of the flagged tidal wetlands and the apparent high water line. 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially 02 acres Ultimately 0.2 acres 8.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH FROSTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? Elyse ❑ No If no,describe briefly: 9.WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY. OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) ©Residential ❑industrial ❑Commercial []Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space ❑Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, Stale or Local) ©Yes ONO If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: Town of Southold Board of Trustees 11.DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes ©No If yes, list agency name and permit I approval: 1 . AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? es / No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponsor Name 1C O NOYES Date: Signeture ( 2 11 If the action I a Costal Area,and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal assment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. El Yes ❑ No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. ElYes ❑ No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A oommunity's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other nature[resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or We of energy? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? Ii yes,explain briefly: Yes ❑No 17, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If s e lain: No PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural); (b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(a) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur.Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actin WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting the determination. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer different from responsible officer) NN 13 FIrJHEI�S i" �a fj7rleAL Q�'�� 5:1 ISL AND w s IN a a 14 23s is 1yIT Is 19 �1 PROJECT REBUILD ' EXISTING DECK " N/F PROPERTYo i ' ;fit i� .:� F' T ' I Mid t✓M� ) /' . LOCATION MAP REFERENCE CHART:UM N/F PROPERTY GRAPH1c SCALE of KIDD; 1000 0 1oa0 IN YARDS S NOTES: 1. ELEVATION DATUM IS NAVD'8B. TIDE DATA 15 TAKEN FROM 2Otl NOAA TIDE TABLES REFERENCE:NOANK MYSTIC RIVER- SITE NEW LONDON PROPERTY .+y 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: aF NOYES REBUILD 600aS1=OF WOOD PATIO DECK N/F PROPERTY OF FISHERS ISLAND.< y+ INCLUDING EXISTING PERIMETER BENCH AND DEVELOPMENT ' ' NEW POST SUPPORTED CABLE RAIL, CORP. LANDWARD OF THE FLAGGED TIDAL �': WETLANDS AND THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. 'F" _ 4.PROJECT PURPOSE. Fi�O RECONSTRUCT A LONG STANDING PAT10 DECK. • 5.THE5E APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT O�/ERAL_L_ PLAN A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMff PURPOSES.THEY ARE GRAPHC SCALE V=10C NOT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. i..`ioo O 1� ATOWN BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE .. .. - REQUIRED 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: WEST: WEST: EAST: BARRON V.KIDD FISHERS ISLAND CYNTHIA DWYER 3838 OAKLAWN RD SUITE 725 DEVELOPMENT CORP. 532 CANTITOE 5T 2 TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PO BOX 464 BEDFORD,NY 10506 DALLAS,TX 75219 FISHERS ISLAND,NY 06390 PROJECT: DECK RECONSTRUCTION LOCATION: RSHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOL D SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK NKEIT WATERWAY: F15HF95 ISLAND SOUND 0D�v0 ,5 DATE: APRIL 25,20"1 e 0 C X a r APPLICANT: NICHOLAS NOYES AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 4 m v 000K0, INC. 68692'1 �^ Keith B.Neilson,PE O0 S� •: � P 0 Mystic.CT 06355 CFESS 10�i 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 EMAIL dockogsnet.net DWG 09-08-2146 Keith Nilson,Poe 4k. 4/27/20119:26 O Noyn DMc-Recanatn+clbtlMq FISHERS N EDGE OF 9PAR'11NAALTERNIFLORA .�. STONE SHOREFRONT .� PROTECTION .T.O.S.PERMIT7316C i� V. N/F PROPERTY OF s `, IN PROPERTY OF BARRON ULMER KID -- `�- s�� ♦ \ CYNTHIA K DVJYER APPROXIMATE LIMITS ' 1 .P1iVJl. ti .OF T1DAL WETLANDS- ..',� e , BRUSH ♦ \ TO BE VERIFIED BY �APPROX.COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE �. PER COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP OF SOUTHOLD,SUFFOLK COUNTY ADDITIONAL BOULDERS =HRLJBSJ�DWELLING NEW YORK PHOTO N0.39,989�3: TO BE PLACED IN VOID5— DOE OF LAWN AS NEGESSARY DECK F.F. SHEET 45•Fl OF 49.8/29/B9 , ,.. ,jEL13:FTNAVD \ .'� TO BE REBUILT \ , + H SITE PROPERTYOF 5 634 06 \ STONE DRIVE NOYES I 1'IN PROPERTY OF� / 1_FISHERS 15LAND•,1 DEVELOPMENT,1 / BENCHMARK P.K.NAL ELEVATION=1338 E=?GISTIIVG GOfVDITIOIVS ELEVATION DATUM NAVD88 SURVEY L>Y GME A550GLATES ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING&ARCHITECTURE,PLL.G GRAPHIC SCALE 1'-60' PRol DECK RECONSTRUCTION 60 30 0 60 LOGA.TION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD E! SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK e� Q�KE1 A WATERWAY:FISHERS ISLAND SOUND g - DATE APRIL 25,2011 0 C j( APPJGANT: NICHOLAS NOYES • D 0 .. AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 4 • _ _ INC. 6869`Z"1 �t / Keith B.Neilson,PEmystic,CT 9pFESS10NP� 8605728939355 60 572 8 3955 .9FAX 860572756 R P 0 EMAIL do ko@snet.net DWG 09105-2I46 Keith Neilson, Docko Inc. 4/27/2011 9:26 AM Noyes_Deck—Reconslruction_2.dwg Op N 0' FL—�N/F PROPERTY OF F15HER5 ISLANI) �T DEVELOPMENT CORP. a. fo r,4A,,j)=O.0 LIMIT of SPAR71NAA-TERNIFLORAX, f APPROXIMATE 11,N7 PROPERTY LINE x .............. SECTIONS(see sheet 4) WLF STONE SHOREFRONTPR0TECn N WLF L F WLF j10 T.05.PERMIT 731W X LIZ ##7 Ap ; —E '3 1�11LF �J /, DGE OF BRUSH tom �15 - WLF #6 NEW WOOD POST;' ' OEDGE OFLAWN CABLE RAILS (TYP) wAla 41�jlc 1 . q 1\ #4 ma STAR-S TO BE REBUILT 71.8 '0 UPPER Limrr5oF TIDAL wErLAND!,�A5 SHRUBS FLAGGED BY RGRARD CAXAVAN,PHD, GME SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL 5GIENTI APPROX COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE PER GOASTA_EROSION HAZARD PERIMETER BE'NCH AREA MAP TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, *am I Now @ TO BE REBUILT SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK,PHOTO REESTABLISH NON-TURF NO.38-e6_0163; VEGETATED BUFFER SHEET 45•FI OF 496/29/W ALONO TOP OF BANK BACK TO 10-F7 v I cmi EYJ5TlNc9 600±5F WCOV DECK TO BE RECON5TRUCTFO DWELLING DECK El 73±FT F.F.EL--135 SITE PROPERTY WOOD WALKWAY oF NOYE.S /SHED� I '%/1E!vv SURVEY ELEVAMON DATUM NAVE)68 .CMF ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING. LAND SURVEYING 6 ARCHMECrURE,PLLC GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=20 PROJECT. DECK RECONSTRUCTION 20 10 0 20 LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN oF5OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK oF I/ WATERWAY.19SHERB ISLAND SOUND •0 DATE. APRIL 25,2011 9 0C IC APPLICANT NICHOLAS NOYES CID AGENT. SHEET 3 OF 4 ING. Keith B.Neilson,PE 0686 N r Mystic,CT 06355 0 P0 860 572 8.939 FAX 860572 7509 'OFES \0'� E�IAIL,dacko9sret.ret DWG 09-08-246 Keith Neilson, Docko Inc. 4/27/2011 9:25 AM Noyes—Deck—Reconstruction-3,dwg NOTE:THERE PRE NO CHANGES TO DWELLING DRANAGE STRUCTURES,GROUND GRADES OR GRADIENTS PROPOSED 2:Fi DECK LEN NEW SUPPORT L POST CrM IXI5TING 600s5F DECK NEW C 4BLEE RAILS(7YP) DECK EL 75:FT NAVO REESTABLISH NON-TURF EV577NO PERIMETER BENCH DECK WIDTH VARIES VEGETA BUFFER B 15H TO BE REBUILT TO BE REBUILT ALO�KOP O K �SFIRUBS '-.:'�,. t ',Ir¢ �'l / �'l /a _STpNE SHORE PROTEG110N �� T� TO S PERMIT 731W p p APPROXIMATE LOCATION EXISTING „ �J BOULDERS IN T1DPL WETLANDS -. p AHWL(SPRING HTL) NOTE STAIRS,RAILS,DECK LOADS AND ILLUMINATION LEVELS SEGTIOIV P. /�. ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL BUILDING GODES. G4ZfW-0c 5CiX 1•=10 DCISTINO 000:3F DECK DECK EL 73:F7 NAVO 10 5 0 10 EXISTING DWELLING DECK WIDTH VARIES FLOOR EL 135sFT TO BE REBUILTT NEW 3UPPOR71RAJL POST(TYP) EXISTWO PERIMETER BENCH LIMITS OF GOASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE TO BE REBUILT TIDAL-WETLANDS ALONG FACE OF HOUSE AS FLAGGED EW DECK STRINGER(TYP) by GME ASSOCIATES r I +:�'� <. .; r ' 4' _ ' •' .. + a r rr STONE SHORE PROTECTION J 'r+s f ,°,rer rx i rrr r. . + ' Sia.t . r� T.0.5.7316G IIh.�{rss I �1 a4' r exr str+:4 , y iZr + S '• „1. _ , EXISTING BOULDERS IN 1Z .t b rt=.,. r r I+ i r \rr/�� i, TIDAL WETLANDS /axl v .� YL 1,. + riJ`; R r1 :3 jlsfti. ; Illxt '.. i y 'T��/ EXISTING GRADE SPARTINA 'CRT POST NEW INTERMEDIATE SUP ✓•+_. PATENS OYP).';, r r DCCAVATE ONLY FOR NEW SUPPORT POSTS!a a t NO SOIL REGRADING-NO EROSION CONTROLS REQUIRED k TAMPEXCAVATED GRAVEL INTO AUOERED POST HOLE TO RESTRAN SUPPORT POST ; r SEGTIOIN B — B GRAPHC 5CA E 1'=G' ELEVATION DATUM NAVD 88 6 3 o G PROJECT: DECK RECONSTRUCTION F Nei LOCATION: FI5HER515LAND-TOWNa`50UTHOLD fGO SUFFOL.K COUNTY,NEW YORK c3�t1 ='I Ty WATERWAY:FISHERS ISLAND SOUND � �•r\ DATE: APRIL 25,2011 D Q C K U APPLICANT: NICHOLAS NOYES AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 f p0686y2 PE Pt( DO ec O...ING.Keith B. ,4pO PO 860 572 8939 FAX WO5727569 EMAIL c1mlos9snet.net DWG 09-OB-Z46 Keith Neilson, Dock. Inc. 4/27/2011 9:24 AM Noyes_Deck—Reconstruction-4.dwg • LOCATIAAP s PROJECT: "DECK RECONSTRUCTION" ------ ^'F_✓!taHnoy-ecocKtsuHn.'sxnr WATERWAY: CHOCOMOUNT COVE 11-_-___ LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD '' SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK APPLICANT: NICHOLAS B. NOYES �,. DATE: APRIL 25,2011 j-=- '/ w10 31/' AGENT: DOCKO,INC. clump E] � x Middl. cwm - 35 i iFMiF 'k J. Clump I ` Itl *iF PUIPR Ropk 1L Lxxel. k �iF Inlander wz. Brool(�._ x A Poln O - 6 ._�... 9F\`, Jj Hungry �fi Eas ' a3 � s _ 1 Po(ni :' � -� .� {�• �, �J ;l Herr CIA rI 14 a j 4t it w ii' q '-N N % IB f � 1 Y O - � h' 11� ✓ i6 ;r a e� � � _. M 1 � / t I � 111 0 �" i11 a al o �° � attiama r a a Itx - q� �' h" - - _ n ,� "op �a,—- ` P 11 '� oat rch�r� '�itAg� tln YJr dt ao- c o� 1 12 pIs Q 1 t �� *K• Poat \P au Idal Flaf - p 46 n iat U ^8 d B® TLC^.Yu yc Y a , . 2: Vi•I ' b � 1 I TAX ASSESSOR'S MAP 1000-003,BLOCK 2,LOT I PROJECT: "DECK RECONSTRUCTION" WATERWAY: CHOCOMOUNT COVE LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK APPLICANT: NICHOLAS B.NOYES DATE: APRIL 25,2011 AGENT: DOC KO,INC. SLAW m^ t5 0 Q 0 m 0 CE LL r by_ MOUNT CNp^O a ucr •Qp'. `•. . s '•w , ll.x 11 LOA x.eA x3Atc! 11.1 LtA 1,2 O 28 k1A e 6 SA Llucr �� Leuc! � u• 23.G L o• u i .4 � 4• O 6 1e x.]a l.eA 1.1 AIcr leA(c) x \ S $.Oa MA ' MAW O 9 b IJ f, �� 1/ x 41 /9ucr Si x.11oc! s ❑ � 1-0Icr 2l.lalcr 1.lA10 l Y G„ s.Ga)c! zx s Ix O c.lArcr �n i V.AA 4iAW x.1Amr "E'Nv c.rtaGuser 5 �� r' 1.11 f i • s S.xuc! S.lAin s.u. Middle For Pond SEE SE.yx } 0-sc V. C FOR SEL NO. cG!-ft'GGV:.e SEE SEC.N0. � SEE SEL N0. G «•� _ f 008-Ot-N36 OOd-01-OOI.l '�` - �• - Y.TCN —� LINE Yai:N ----- / `LIVE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © Ie Real Property Tax Service Agency Site Cow'y Center Rrvrn e ;ed N Y 1190i S _ AI NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION DECK RECONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION NICHOLAS NOYES CHOCOMOUNT COVE, FISHERS ISLAND,NY APRIL 25,2011 GENERAL The Noyes family owns property off East End Road located along the shore of Chocomount Cove on Fishers Island. This project involves the reconstruction of the deck as detailed in the photographs and attached permit application drawings. All work is landward of the apparent high water line. It is anticipated that all work will be done from the land and by hand except possibly using a gasoline-powered auger to dig the post holes. The exposure is to the north and east and the site is subject to occasional waves and flooding conditions depending on weather conditions and wind direction. The Noyes' property is approximately 1.8 acres with a steep bank transitioning to wetlands at the shoreline. Shoreline protection at this site has been reviewed during previous permit applications. The deck on the north side of the house is in need of repairs, in fact reconstruction of the deck is warranted. There is a drop of about eight feet from the yard to the toe of the bank. The slope is covered with junipers and yews and various vegetation,not turf. The attached narrative substantiates the scope of work and provides responses to various concerns outlined in Local Law No. 6 2004, relating to new Chapter 97 "Wetlands and Shoreline"of the Code of the Town of Southold. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is or may be subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of these permits, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town of Southold and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and the NYS DEC, and their officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Town of Southold, Board of Trustees as well as State and Federal agencies in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. 1 The permittee willo`tify the Trustees in writing upon comp'1L'lon of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a, most of this project relates to modifications of shoreline protection, and there are no clock facilities at the site and none are requested. 1. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 2. There are no permanent dock facilities or boating structures at this site. 3. Completion of the proposed work will not encumber public passage along the shore. It should be noted that the shore of Chocomount Cove represents a substantial drop-off of terrain and there is very little passable foreshore landward of the house. The foot traffic in this area is rare,if at all. NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands Regulations—Sections 661.5 and 661.9 This project represents the reconstruction of existing deck facility at the Noyes property at the far south west of quadrant of Chocomount Cove. New posts will support the deck in place as shown in the application drawings. There is an area of tidal wetlands fringe vegetation approximately 30 feet north of the deck, at the We of the bank, and that vegetation will not be disturbed. Deck's at residential properties on the waterfront are considered to be generally compatible use in an adjacent area(AA)with a permit being required under Section 661.5(b) (1), 15 and 24. This deck was repaired in the 1990's. Routine maintenance and replacement of lost or deteriorated decking has been on an "as needed"basis. Under Section 661.9, the standards for issuance of permits of NYS DEC regulations, the following are considered to be pertinent considerations. ➢ The policies are created to preserve and protect tidal wetlands and prevent their despoilation and destruction. Regulated activities will not have an undo adverse impact on the present or potential value of the affected tidal wetlands. ➢ This deck reconstruction project is compatible with public health and welfare policies of the State and a building permit for the work will be acquired prior to the start of work. Replacement of the deck is allowable under zoning regulations. It will be rebuilt to the same dimensions and elevation as the long-standing structure, with a rail as necessary for safety. ➢ The project complies with development restrictions contained in Section 661.6 as this work is reconstruction of an existing long-standing deck structure and is compatible with the use of the site, zoning and the long-standing use of the site. ➢ This project will not have an undo or adverse impact on the present or potential value of nearby tidal wetlands vegetation or the stability of the bank. 2 Town of Southold—Local Waterfront Revitalization Program These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies from the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program are appropriate. Policy 2 —Water Dependent Uses — This project is to conduct routine repair work on fully functional deck at this waterfront site. This deck is used for passive recreation and enjoyment of the waterfront which is a legitimate water-dependent use. Policy 5 — Use of Existing Developed Shorefront — This project will be primarily reconstruction of a long-standing deck, clear of sensitive habitat or tidal wetlands and restore it to be safe and reliably usable in all weather conditions. Policy 7 — Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat— Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. Two feet or more of height will continue to be maintained above bottom. The ground and the deck stays short of the bluff(bank). There will be no change to the dimension, height or amount of structure which might affect fish habitat and special wildlife or marsh habitat. The non-turf vegetation buffer at the bank will be retained or replaced as a part of this project. Policy 8 — Protection & Preservation of Habitat — Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the seawall and dock structure are being kept to their existing configuration, and will be repaired consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law,No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold. Policy 11 — Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The deck reconstruction project will be conducted in such a way so as to minimize damage to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above by alignment, footprint and elevation. There are no tidal wetlands at this project site and the tidal wetlands vegetation further north will not be disturbed. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding= This project consists of reconstruction an open wood post-supported deck that will in no way adversely affect water flow and circulation in the coveor flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence on those flood levels. Policy 15 —No Dredging—Dredging is not required in this project. 3 SUMMARY This project represents the reconstruction of a long-standing, deck off the back side of the house at the property of the Noyes family on Fishers Island. The shorefront protection in place has existed for years, probably since the house was built in the 1960s. This project complies with all applicable standards of Local Law No. 6, 2004, the Town of Southold LWRP and the NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands and its approval is respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. 4 NICHOLAS NOYES • DECK RECONSTRUCTION „MW o1CRv✓im�ICPe-9u9 HN-ey,. bMFgbf - - 1�,... argmm. __-. -._.: eameaMv .rtreuvc�c_.= _v:ca. .✓ _wewzxr . .cc.•.sn nr.•san. N X Paw P•.. Cenres i9 :: _ :. .yP Mne Wee�[iumea Lu,ee CGnmmive OiieCheNwai1�61Me5Ort yy MgoeA UN9Noa NeeeeeoeerYAiCpO Wd Mao ol[M.or�,.rcca•..a-e"Na. q-® - ep- nee- seMe- seee.p- " bing Cn ..um Cove Fmhem IsiaW NY r s ! fl eye b •BlrCa Chocomount Cove i seW sw nu«ia w.+Mu+ FaMre usr�eN vvsuv Na's R 9915 Gnb8 R4s Meb 651c�prg LeMa Mqe -_. YMme+l nme[ve Morcm ..•. Sun . ��Mrq MM�=rumcuF Cvrt-�M.p-WmMeenvm iaGpm _ �Si�r..- _ ! �. �F' � .- .w..>n ra y (J'aenmrrcweo CcaM.eeuaL'eumm�ee r;.n(„'r2e eom...�['uR�rier son('•r M�oaWa�wmo..w,a.m�.Y L'wmoo.,Meei v m ewcemameaW e�ey M.ea ,� . . w �. sMro• *ms.p. bing CMcamunl C. Fo .ISYM.NY Maps Web M., Chocomount Cove .. . 4 A J 1 &re's eye nwmn a•wr�Nea.x. - e:onre wai cmmen - V!'NiPY �saeane Oars Onh A HOz MiRrfl G.FgiM<:zvR•fr Mme -t r Yterr.eriueMnMMOXOr ..use - U NICHOLAS NOYES DECK RECONSTRUCTION HMep ol(rcxvmvnfwe-B<9MN-Wntl�MrT EPMn - oavxom �oprseR « X ?a,.y r -r�'., ..� anprQH�l/IBGaMNabJi80�zW ZC Y'MOWSMBI%NmCMRtlnTRWSZT �ew'ret H - '<: - - yMBm olrrc Wee�CMdM fuse�jfamNa Y4�iwRR•8n88�i�rnWBen�Abofa WYlnNm Md.4lgre�WMNw Meeid Mav vl<`c[omwm.CoeBirq Meet f]'-a l{ Vye Stley- iatl-Q- binc� Ch...,,Com Fslu.W.W NV Mal" 'meo Chocomount Cove + D O alm.•y. o.ewa sore se,.e nM wnm ra.a<em [�e�se'rnmen �reAa�Y e.r. a Gnft m.ca.s a w M8 A58 SlaCprq(;erlas Mate y[ F : mow ytc:!� ice.'•!*' _ YHme1 Pue[W MWe(In hl]St - � r E�dfMmneuMfwe.Bn3MiaW,aNaLnenn EW.cm 'a.. x4M. ... _ �....�! �'' +'"^^r^�a'•+te1 rdWrW i1 t. - CBm al:re WM CCu•<iLwIX CCuco.xla C�-re vTe Clnrerrcl SaM CMi[mfoM1 l�W:Mv' SWM1Ap'%<ye Wirgaas MNy MapdCra owmtwe3.ng Wvt Ty - © '. 9R.- I•pe- 5<kl<- ioq{-Q- bing Ch....,tCove FMe WM NV Maps w<r, Chocomount Cove 'eae.•ri Mai ne.nawa.en,n Emae�r�mei nfnaov BarsC 6fl FlDs t. dJ,' MCXs 8 SlFpgrg fRIWrS Y 4ti f a,.Mumal I artrxr i Cerw I aaeniz I<auiwm I rkm *au a mi OMInnOiPWalU MN<Pn tl]A -r F R'S MAP 1000 003,BLOCK 2,LOT 1"DECK RECONSTRUCTION" CHOCOMOUNTCOVE FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLDSUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK NICHOLAS B.NOYES APRIL 25,2011 DOCKO,INC. sLANU m is o "At o m 0 .�Y LC COA ti Q.gp. LN�OMouN f s 5 23AId 2.2A 1lA L]A 7.2 0 O 12A 1 6 S e N.lA 5.4 15AIc) ' LOA10w ��FFF��,,,"""}/}/}/ O 10 2.1A S YS 1.1Nc19.1 30A lUlc) 2.dA • 12 r N I o 2 y :. 5 S.Oe 2.1A JA11c) 6 $ iaucl r! 'S. [d c °NN 1 2.91n 4.1 2.]Ald - tl e 1 Alc) tdA.) ., J S.010 2 - L2 y 5 s � aY.IAId � Jp/ t.le¢I rtwY�.acusal S.ieln 1 2 � i i 5'J9p1 6.9A Middle For PpM^ f [w sa4 NO. [W aCL.NO. SEE SEC.Q. SEE SEC.N0. 008.0I-003.1 - f ['i z I COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I A - --.— -- — A,Red Proper`y tax Service Agency E CoW'Y Cen:ar AiWh!%N Y 1190i • LOCATI AP .�. - s PROJECT: "DECK RECONSTRUCTION" "- 9�� eon auxoRur WATERWAY: CHOCOMOUNT COVE - __ 1---- LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK APPLICANT: NICHOLAS B. NOYES DATE: AP j 25,2011 agB AGENT: DOCKO,INC. coo clump u _ � 6) z s-, ++. Middl.. Clump is _— I —� iWset-.. - ... .-_ ae Z*-* clump hlpit - 6 Rock - I SI� � I i ntl Broo Ks' # -n` al Point* * _ iF\' 'Ff Hungry �b Ea v s p .a Hm'r —4t. R 30 - la aqe or ' ji ut w .., ♦ yt /4 I ,♦ �� II II v ��I I�Q v� 5t _ h �aa �,' It I , �` vv vv � '` It q fJ � TreaEu're �*.v Flat �46 - Isl nd Qam ttckya , �me I i I OFFICE LOCATION: aQF $oil MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex �� yOIO P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 rn Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 ��y00UNTy 0� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM IL -- To: Jill Doherty, President JUN 2 2 2011 Town of Southold Board of Trustees i From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Southhoid Town LWRP Coordinator Board of Trustees Date: June 22, 2011 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for NICHOLAS NOYES SCTM#1000-3-2-1 Docko, Inc. on behalf of NICHOLAS NOYES requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to rebuild 600+/- sf. of wood patio deck including existing perimeter bench and new post supported cable rail. Located: Private Rd, Fishers Island. SCTM#1000-3-2-1 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with following LWRP Policy Standard and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. The proposed action is located entirely within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 3. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. Maintaining existing development and structures in hazard areas may be warranted for: a. structures which functionally require a location on the coast or in coastal waters. b. water-dependent uses which cannot avoid exposure to hazards. C. sites in areas with extensive public investment, public infrastructure, or major public facilities. d. sites where relocation of an existing structure is not practical. The structure is not water dependent and does not meet criteria a-d above. Further the proposed action is a regulated activity in the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, however, it is difficult to determine how the regulations apply to the action. Spot elevations shown on the Plan View (DWG 09-08-2146) indicate a rise of 6' from the toe of the stone revetment to the top of bank. It is recommended that the Board has the applicant clarify the natural protective feature within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Figure 1. Subject parcel. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney - O I BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit Received Application )01 11 _ Received Fee: $ Ste_ �,)D LXkL C(61`l Q _✓ Completed Application Incomplete _ SEQRA Classification Type I X- Type If_ Unlisted _ Coordination Date:(Date Sent) - LWRP Consistency Asse sm or Form CAC Referral Sent - _ Date of Inspection Receipt of CAC Report Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: Resolution: Name of Applicant: Nicholas Noyes Address: 103 Coolidge Road, Concord MA 01742 Phone Number: ( 978 )369-9708 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 -003-2-1 Property Location: Off Privt#tglad75((��, n'hocomount Cove (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Docko Inc. (If applicable) Address: P. O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 Phone: (860) 572-8939 1 c� r NV Ord of Trustees Applicati* GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet) : 1.8 ACRE Area Zoning: RESIDENTIAL Previous use of property: RESIDENTIAL Intended use of property: RESIDENTIAL Covenants and Restrictions: _ Yes X No If"Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision Prior permits/ approvals for site improvements: Agency Date Southold Board of Trustees June 19, 2006 No prior permits/ approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No _Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : Rebuild 600 +/- SF of wood patio deck includingexisting xisting perimeter bench and new post supported cable rail, landward of the flagged tidal wetlands and the apparent high water line. Ward of Trustees Applicalt COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: Rebuild 600 +/- SF of wood patio deck including existing perimeter bench and new post supported cable rail landward of the flagged tidal wetlands and the apparent high water line. Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? (L� i No X Yes MI AY 2 6 2011 Does the project involve excavation or filling? X No Yes e `j If Yes, now much material will be excavated? 0 (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? 0 (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: All materials will be brought to the site by truck and construction will be on site This is a wood post-supported timber structure. Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features.(Use attachments if necessary): See Attached Narrative .ard of Truateea Applicati• COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: Shorefront protection modifications to minimize damage to o the Noyes' Qrivate property Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? X No Yes If Yes, now much material will be excavated? (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features.(Use attachments if necessary): See Attached Narrative Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Rebuild a existing wood deck Area of wetlands on lot: 3,000 square feet Percent coverage of lot: 5 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 30 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 30 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling: X No Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 3+/- feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: 1.1 +/- Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: No fill is to be placed Statement of the effect, if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): No Affect owe" Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM PROPERTY LOCATION: S.C.T.M.s: THE FOLLNO ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A S •WATBR,ORADIN%DRAINAGE AN EROSION CO LAN on CERTIFIED BY A DBSION P' 8 OF NEW YOIBI. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM p / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? p Will this Project Retain All Slorm,Watar Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within `j !'F.S Generated by a Two(2')Inch Rainfall on She? Construction)the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (s.P.rAaes) (This itarn will Include all runoff created by site b. What is the Total Area of Land Gearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed Site Improvements and the perma end creation of ConsWdbn activity? Impervious surfaces.) (9P.1 Asa) PROVIDE-BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (PmteeAeesea P.e.s ar imee) Drainage Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show Proposed ❑ Drainageinape Structures Indicating Size S Location?This � than shag Include all Proposed Grade Changes and Slopes controlling Surface water Flow. _ $ Does are Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion ❑ and sediment control practices that will be used to r 1� control she.erosion and slam water discharges. This�, ,S Y/(�l•+s ham must be maintained throughout the Engrg Construction Period. 4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading Of Excavation where there Is a change to the Natural EAgring Grade Involving more than 2D0 Cubic Yards of Material within any Parcel? § Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Adivitlas S Encompassing an Area In Excess of Five Thousand ❑ --ram (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? I S vim' S Is Mere a Natural Water Course Running through the D She? Is this Pmjeol within the Trustees jurisdiction t✓ General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(100')feetof a Wetland a submission of a SWPPP Is naquked for all ConaWglbn aavities invddng will Beach? dleerhancaa at ore(1)or nhom saes; Mduding disturbances of lm man one aqe tell 7 VAR Mere be Site preparation an Existing Grade Slopes❑are part of a larger common plan that wil uNbrohly disturb am or more saasof land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to Including Consawnon edNNes Involving soli dsbaWnas of less than one(1)acre where One Hundred(1 OV)of Horizontal Distance? the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit Is required for storm water discharges. (BWPPP's Shag meta the Minimum ReWhemeMe of the SPDES General PonmR 8 Will Driveways,Pending Areas a other Impervious El _ for Eldon Water Discharges hoer Conshuchon activity•Permit No,OP-040401.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm•Waer Run-OE 1.The SWPPP shag be prepared prior to the ubra tal of the Not.The NO]shell be Into and/or In Me direction of a Town nlghFol way? eu batted to the Department prig to tie commencement a/ nstr couden activity. 2.The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment coned pracdoes and whers 9 W01 this Project Require the Placement of Material, ❑ — required,poor-wrstuaiah ammr water managenem precdoen rem will be used anwor Removal of Vegetation and/or Me Conviction,N any _ combucled to reduce be polularm h stare enter dsdreupes and to asue, Item WNW Me Town Right-of-Wary a Road Shoulder compliance wah it*helms anti ooMaUons of the panit.In addition,me SWPPP ehW Afae7 trhferrm well xorrarAhea as babaarbrnaq Idendly,Potential souroas of pollution v"ch may reasonably be expected a aged is tee"Aprwn.l gualOyofstannu erdlecharges. NOR: NAry Meaarto Qeallom One dwough Mee IsAmearedwah Schack Mark 3.AN SWPPPa that require the postconshuclbn storm water managarrard Pracks In a Sea and the combruallon sate dhbadeom Is behessn 6.000".a 1 Aare In sae, component shag be prepared by a quaBed Dealan Professional Lkxeared In New York a Smrm.Waer,dredged,Drainage A Eresbn contrail Plan Is Required by the Toen a that's knovdedgeabe in the pintipes and praclloss of Storm water Management. Southold and Mug be submhbd ter Rwew Pdor to brogues of Any Building PwndL (NOTE. ACead Mnk(!)wWw AraeerTge O.Oml Requto W.Cargbar Appeadwq STATE OFF G T �/COUNILI'O\F.I......./.IV..eW.4al.)!, a..QSS That I,.....h.�..! ..!1... . L. .�..l.C.r..L7. .................being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Pemut, (Norm of lndlvWul spring Document h And that he/she is the .................................IX.. ..4r.'..o±................................. . ..- ,Crxsacer,Allen.Daporele OMmr,eb:) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authoraul to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to bbe7fore a this; ...L....... ..............:dayof........ / .. . ..........., .l �, � NotvYPublic. ......... /../..l...Ci s .............................. (sigrarhw a ANAesmI FORM - • ��gUFFO(,�C • 3 Jill M. Doherty,President Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President P.O. Box 1179 James F. King S ' Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen y' l ��a Telephone(631)765-1892 John Bredemeyer # Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of NICHOLAS NOYES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) 'i STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTJ[Nc� , I, (' A Nei l s o r-, /dba� ( Ol' K o Iva c ,if Holmes" Sf, My f Ic CT- being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the 6 day of U IN� 2011,/I personally posted the property known as M ,�C, H OLAS N Qy S by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wed,June 2222, 2011 on or about 6:00 PM. Dated: (signature) 6�worn to before me this dayof✓C!/R-20// otary Public 17 y corr/yrssi /F- rA�r�s e r; PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: Fishers Island Dev. Corp. P. O. Box 464, Fishers Island,NY 063902 Cynthia Dwyer 532 Cantitoe Street, Bedford,NY 10506 Fishers Island Utility Co. Drawer E, Fishers Island,NY 06390 Bradley Collins & Amy Fine 1021 Park Avenue, Apt. 4-C New York, New York 10028 STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW LONDON DOCKO. INC. , residing at 14 HOLMES STREET MYSTIC CT 06355, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the jk day of , J L, t1e 20 ( j deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at MYSTIC, CT, that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this Day of ,/I��_ 12011 )� L J Not Public it Postal . CERTIFIED MAII-r- RECEIPT O ry1 (Ei6mestic Mail Only;No Insurance Covers e Provided) p to p } ` C3 : ru FACIAL USE aPostage $ a sn CO Postage $ /1 Certified Fee sds• ITI Ceditietl Fee p Return Receipt Fee Poslm > 1'tl (Endorsement Requiretl) ae y p Return Receipt Fee �"• j t/ -( p (Endorsement Required) ' y p Restricted Delivery Fee 10 GJ p Restricted Delive Fee `1(Endorsement Required)) ry p 1P �Y (Entlorsement Required) {� r. 9 C3 _ j Total Postage&Fees $ r 0 1 m Total Postage&Fees $ �t 7 ra Sent o r-1 ->-� p Se To R�D :Y..eAw�N -..1}t1l...Fl.(vE - p c �rEn,. ...ls� ivo C3 or PoBox No. r9 veep APt.No.; lY1< E. �� p orPo Box No. Po �`-- '` C-:--iere:Zi-u---l. !}.---K-A --- --��'-- ------------------------ r� --a caw--------- - [z,�a!/..Or:. ..----------------------------- RK OAK /�02� aty ware,nP.e E (Ai(/b PS Form . . t Postal ..n •• • CERTIFIED MAIL,,, t.mestic mail Only;No insurance coverage ProiNcled) O ¢¢ Ln ti R.1 t. �" _ •k i a M1e%• Postage $ S ra t t Certified Fee fin(, d& rq Postage $ $cis T V Certified Fee p Return Receipt Fee _ Postmark pti (Endorsement Required) a3 ��V/¢`e p Return Receipt Fee Postmark C3 Restricted Delivery Fee co OO p (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Required) to p Flair led Delivery Fee C3 L_., Q (Endorsement Required) 43 Total Postage S Fees $ .J, 7 5 M1 rR 1 tO Total Postage&Fees $ 5 �> rq pSfleet Apt N T . � v- "Y- -.Z ---- Q .f •- - p . p Scat sPtIt No., CitySe ,Z/P.d�aS�llOGL or PO s.0QA- Al /0t5 : �l�•2`La- l/.([]/a Tli. /N. ..................................... NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION DECK RECONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION NICHOLAS NOYES CHOCOMOUNT COVE,FISHERS ISLAND,NY APRIL 25, 2011 GENERAL The Noyes family owns property off East End Road located along the shore of Chocomount Cove on Fishers Island. This project involves the reconstruction of the deck as detailed in the photographs and attached permit application drawings. All work is landward of the apparent high water line. It is anticipated that all work will be done from the land and by hand except possibly using a gasoline-powered auger to dig the post holes. The exposure is to the north and east and the site is subject to occasional waves and flooding conditions depending on weather conditions and wind direction. The Noyes' property is approximately 1.8 acres with a steep bank transitioning to wetlands at the shoreline. Shoreline protection at this site has been reviewed during previous permit applications. The deck on the north side of the house is in need of repairs, in fact reconstruction of the deck is warranted. There is a drop of about eight feet from the yard to the toe of the bank. The slope is covered with junipers and yews and various vegetation, not turf. The attached narrative substantiates the scope of work and provides responses to various concerns outlined in Local Law No. 6 2004, relating to new Chapter 97 "Wetlands and Shoreline"of the Code of the Town of Southold. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is or may be subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of these permits, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town of Southold and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and the NYS DEC, and their officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Town of Southold, Board of Trustees as well as State and Federal agencies in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. 1 The permittee will ilefify the Trustees in writing upon comoon of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a, most of this project relates to modifications of shoreline protection, and there are no dock facilities at the site and none are requested. 1. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 2. There are no permanent dock facilities or boating structures at this site. 3. Completion of the proposed work will not encumber public passage along the shore. It should be noted that the shore of Chocomount Cove represents a substantial drop-off of terrain and there is very little passable foreshore landward of the house. The foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all. NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands Regulations—Sections 661.5 and 661.9 This project represents the reconstruction of existing deck facility at the Noyes property at the far south west of quadrant of Chocomount Cove. New posts will support the deck in place as shown in the application drawings. There is an area of tidal wetlands fringe vegetation approximately 30 feet north of the deck, at the toe of the bank, and that vegetation will not be disturbed. Deck's at residential properties on the waterfront are considered to be generally compatible use in an adjacent area(AA)with a permit being required under Section 661.5(b) (1), 15 and 24. This deck was repaired in the 1990's. Routine maintenance and replacement of lost or deteriorated decking has been on an "as needed"basis. Under Section 661.9, the standards for issuance of permits of NYS DEC regulations, the following are considered to be pertinent considerations. ➢ The policies are created to preserve and protect tidal wetlands and prevent their despoilation and destruction. Regulated activities will not have an undo adverse impact on the present or potential value of the affected tidal wetlands. ➢ This deck reconstruction project is compatible with public health and welfare policies of the State and a building permit for the work will be acquired prior to the start of work. Replacement of the deck is allowable under zoning regulations. It will be rebuilt to the same dimensions and elevation as the long-standing structure, with a rail as necessary for safety. ➢ The project complies with development restrictions contained in Section 661.6 as this work is reconstruction of an existing long-standing deck structure and is compatible with the use of the site, zoning and the long-standing use of the site. ➢ This project will not have an undo or adverse impact on the present or potential value of nearby tidal wetlands vegetation or the stability of the bank. 2 Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies from the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program are appropriate. Policy 2 —Water Dependent Uses — This project is to conduct routine repair work on fully functional deck at this waterfront site. This deck is used for passive recreation and enjoyment of the waterfront which is a legitimate water-dependent use. Policy 5 Use of Existing Developed Shorefront= This project will be primarily reconstruction of a long-standing deck, clear of sensitive habitat or tidal wetlands and restore it to be safe and reliably usable in all weather conditions. Policy 7 — Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat — Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. Two feet or more of height will continue to be maintained above bottom. The ground and the deck stays short of the bluff(bank). There will be no change to the dimension, height or amount of structure which might affect fish habitat and special wildlife or marsh habitat. The non-turf vegetation buffer at the bank will be retained or replaced as a part of this project. Policy 8 — Protection & Preservation of Habitat — Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the seawall and dock structure are being kept to their existing configuration, and will be repaired consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law,No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold. Policy 11 — Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The deck reconstruction project will be conducted in such a way so as to minimize damage to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above by alignment, footprint and elevation. There are no tidal wetlands at this project site and the tidal wetlands vegetation further north will not be disturbed. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding - This project consists of reconstruction an open wood post-supported deck that will in no way adversely affect water flow and circulation in the coveor flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence on those flood levels. Policy 15 —No Dredging—Dredging is not required in this project. 3 SUMMARY This project represents the reconstruction of a long-standing, deck off the back side of the house at the property of the Noyes family on Fishers Island. The shorefront protection in place has existed for years, probably since the house was built in the 1960s. This project complies with all applicable standards of Local Law No. 6, 2004, the Town of Southold LWRP and the NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands and its approval is respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, D✓OCKOO, INC. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. 4 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet Flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑Part 1 []Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: 2 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration wig be prepared. ❑B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ©C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions DECK RECONSTRUCTION-NICHOLAS NOYES Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action DECK RECONSTRUCTION Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) SITE OFF EAST END ROAD(SO CALLED) Name of Applicant/Sponsor NICHOLAS NOYES Address 103 COOLIDGE ROAD City/PO CONCORD State MA Zip Code 01742 Business Telephone 978-369-9708 Name of Owner(if different) NICHOLAS NOYES,ROBERT NOYES,TOBY NOYES Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: Rebuild 600+/-SF of wood patio deck including existing perimeter bench and new post supported cable rail,landward of the flagged tidal wetlands and the apparent high water line. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ✓❑Residential (suburban) ID Rural (non-farm) ❑✓ Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1•g acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.5 acres 0.5 acres Forested 0.5 acres 0.5 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.2 acres 0.2 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.4 acres 0.4 acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.2 acres 0.2 acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ID Well drained 100%of site ❑Moderately well drained_%of site. ❑Poorly drained _%of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? © Yes No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ❑✓ 0-1 o% 50% Ell o- 15% 30% El 15% or greater 20 % 6. Is project substantiall contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes El No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes E]No B, What is the depth of the water table? 10(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer.? ❑Yes El No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes El No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ElYes ❑ri No According to: f is a developed residential area. Only upland parts of the property are developed with the house,driveway,gardens and the back deck. Identify each species: The adjacent tidal wetlands fringe marsh north of the site are colonized by spartina altemiflora. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? E]Yes El No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ©Yes Q No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Yes ElNo The house dominates the upland non-wooded portion of the site. There is no vista for pubic to enjoy except from the water and[ha[ will not be affected or changed noticably. 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: The tidal wetlands fringe marsh is in Chocomount Cove off Fishers Island Sound. b. Size lin acres): Approximately 3,000 SF,0.07 acres Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? E Yes ❑No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? EYes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ©Yes ONo 18. Is the site located in Eyes district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 3047 ❑Yes El No 19. Is the site located in or substantial contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 El Yes Si No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ElNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor. 1.8 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.01 acres initially; 0.01 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.4 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 50+/- (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. 0 % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 3 ; proposed 3 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour. 0 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 Ultimately 1 i. Dimensions (in feet)of largest proposed structure: 3 height; 50+/- width; 20 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is7 N/A ft. 2. How much natural material(i.e. rack, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tonstcubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes ❑No WA a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes El No 4. How many acres of vegetation(trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other localty-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ❑ No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 1 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated l (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 9 month 2011 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 10 month 2011 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ❑ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes 51 No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑No a. If yes, indicate type of waste(sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [Dyes❑No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑ Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ENo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes r!]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ElNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Yes❑No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes El No If yes, indicate type(s) 20. Ambient noise levels will be exceeded while the auger is physically in use to drill the post holes. This equipment is powered by a gasoline engine. Noise will be limited and of limited duration,days only for a week or less. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes El No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 • 25. Approvals Required: ' Type Submittal Date Wetlands Permit April 2011 City, Town, Village Board E]Yes ©No Town of Southold City, Town, Village Planning Board MYes El No City, Town Zoning Board ©Yes El No City, County Health Department ®Yes rMl No Other Local Agencies ©Yes 0 No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes El No Wetlands Permit April 2011 State Agencies Yes No NYS DEC Federal Agencies Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes n No If Yes, indicate decision required: MZoning amendment 11 Zoning variance ❑New/revision of master plan © Subdivision E] Site plan El Special use permit ©Resource management plan © Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Residential 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Single Family Dwelling 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No changes are proposed 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Residential 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? G1 Yes No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a /4 mile radius of proposed action? All property adjacent to the site and along the shore is residential.Properties south of the road are alas residential.Southwest of the site is the golf driving range. g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a /4 mile? ❑i Yes No 9, If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 HPR 26 2U11 H: UeVM HP LHStKJtt JeUU p. + 4 • • 10. %MN propoawd action require any w(Imri bdda )for the farmetion of s ym or WSW distrtets7 D yes 0 No ; 1.1..11vYt ttq popDsotl-aeewn aead a dainaed ft wly ddmm t*y pr&4klM swviees Ireaeshm.odueatiah.poke, nM protedW C3 yes a Na a. If yat,N ixlsghp.ppaaRy wINi:lenl Ua thirxfe ptoJactd deithenrrt 13 ym ON* i 12.WIN ttM poposed action remilt In the gem him of kafllo slyrdflwcpy above pmsant Nvels4 D Yes®No j it, if yes. Is do axkft mad nehvo*alequats to handle the additlorat trgfic. Elyes Oleo I, D. YhPoraatleal Wtab Attach s yaddalaral Inf nmetbn as may be nhsedatl to doily your praJeot r dare am or may be any rivese m pacts Cs"odtired wYh yaw pnaposal,plew aixum such xro&As and the mesaxes which.you prgwss to mhgete at mold dam. E YarMbMm I sadly Odin the a110nikafOn p(W"Above is UM to the bW-or my lamwatlip Appleaa/SpOnadf Nana Nmhelss Slgeeturo 7 i Tide 'CP'Qw9�lq` if to aadoa it let o Caag*Ana,able yN aa.a aMte adeay,eee4lsae pe Geeal Aaaaana Fans Mfbre tlns' ON V*b g* somemoom Pape 10 d 21 I PART 11- IMPACT ASSESSMENT o be completed by Lead AgentA A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? t yes,aooMkhale fire review process and use the FULL FAF. Yes O t4o a. VYLL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEWAS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617in It No,s negaeue dedarallan may be superseded by another Involved agency. Yes ©No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLMINO:(Arhswers may be hendwoll1m,if Iegbe) C1. ExIskV ak quaay,safaoe agrouMwata queWy a quahrdry,noise levels,exbtrg VaRw p flan sold waste production or dsposaL potential far emakW%drainage a600dngprobkms? ExplainbrW No C& AeWwft arkul ral,arolhaeobgird,Nstadc.a o6rer natural or actual fesasars;or canmWy a hheiglhborthood charade(?Explain bdel . No C9. Vegetation or fauna.fish,shelfish orwldlte spades,sipNficaM ,or hastened or endatgered spedes?Eh9hlakh;R y: No C4.A comrnxdyle existing plants appals as offldapy adopted,or a=In use or NaeRW ofuse of WM or other naaaat msohxce4?Fxgain bdeay: _ No C5. Growth,wabsequem developmeK or related adivlies"y 10 be Indaaxl by 0%proposed salon?Explain bdely: No Co.tang tens.~tern,amasative,a otlher effects not Identified la C1C5? EWain bdely: . No C7. Other Irnpacls~ng lunges la use of ellher ua. w of energ atn No D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTALAfA 7 If brie . ❑ Yes _ Q.No E IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE CONTROVERgy RELATED TO pf)TFJYTW.ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL eAPACT8? IfYes g✓ "a explain, PART N-DE7ERAAWAYION OF SONIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) *WTRUCTIONS: Foreachadverseeffedidenifted above.detartnMewhedwitissubstandal,large,knportantwegienNss significant. Each effect shouW be aseeseed In conneWon with Its(a)setting CA Urban or noel);(b)p�t.a.b..a.,l,ift,,�r,,�of ooaarkg;(c)duraft(fp imeverd AW,(a) geographic soaps:acid M magnitude. If necessary,add atadailmW or reference supporting aratUML Enetae that explsahatans ootddn stAdwAdetat.to show#W d relevant adverse Impacts have been Wentted and adequately addressed. Nquestan d ofpart l wag checked yes,dmdeb mkhatonofMgnMcancemustevakudethepotemiadNnpadoffireprapoaedacdmontheenVkonnwxvWdmucied0moftheCEA. Check 90boxffyouhaveMahtlled one wmore potentially,Wooralprylicantad ersehnp ctswhichMAYooan•.Thenprooseddkedytotlhe FAF arMbr prepare a poskive.dedarabon. Check 96 box Ifyou have determined,based on the kdormagon and analysis above and any supportrg loaanaraa(lon,1*the proposed WILL determination.result M any sWiilcani adverse en iromnentaf kneads AND provide,on atedwiefds as necessary,the reasons suppatnl Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date JIII M. Doherty President -�fr n�or Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency I THIe of Responsible Officer SIgnature Resparhslb a Officer ead.Agency Sig A-of party tuatnerent from responsible officer) HVK db eUll J:Uern Mr LHbLKJLf Jeuu P. Board of Trbstsas appiieetioa i �vrBOBss�Tzam (mbers th4 applioaat in not the owner) r, 1tia6el w' e_B � rasidiaw at St ®own (print owner of propty) taafiLap aazass) rzasses iiLams. Nr do hereby authorise nn®n.. =sc.. (Wsat) rfine. CT to apply for peradt(s) from the sonthcl¢ Board of To" Treetees oa Or baAaif.. IOC as%s • urt) RPM ZU ZU11 -4.U2YR HY LHStKJhl JZUU P. 0 OF amrd o! !rusts" awlicatiml County of sawk . Sure of Nbw Yark i NIGH L S,NOYEY MM DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE SHE IS THAPPLICANT FOR THE..ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HISOM KNOWIEDOE AND BELIEF.AND THAT ALL WOU,WELLSE DONE IN THE MANI'jER SET FORTH 110 THIS APKJCATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SQLTfI OLD I TOWN BOARD OF TRUSIZIM THE APPLICANT AORIIES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND TOWN TRUBTSES HARMLESS AND FREE MOM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNM OR BY VIRTUE Of SAID PERMIT(S). IF cw-kNTED. IN ODNUiBMG THIS APPLICATION, I ,HER1 Y .AUTRORLZE THE TRUSTM, THEM AGLINT(S) OR RHPRESEMTATIVLI A TO EMM ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPELT THR PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION: i { 7 SWORN TO BEFORE ME HIS �/ _ DAY OFL�T M a Non"Pt bll+ JOlfes A O�e� Com r0vA*a 0fMM*N0diAdb *C&mrftbn6�o�lw Town of Southold LWRP ORNSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORD A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus. each answer must be explained in detail listing both suoporting and non-suoportine facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 41103-2-1 PROJECT NAME: The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board _ Planning Board Building Dept. Board of Trustees X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Nature and extent of action: Rebuild 600 +/- SF of wood patio deck including existing perimeter bench and new post supported cable rail, landward of the flagged tidal wetlands and the apparent high water line. 1 • 0 Location of action: Site off East End Road (so called) . Site acreage: Parcel=1.8 acres. Present Land use: Residential Present Zoning Classification: Residential 2. if an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: a) Name of applicant: Nicholas Noyes b) Mailing Address: 103 Coolidge Road Concord.MA 01742 c) Telephone number: Area Code (978) 369-9708 d) Application number, if any Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X No_ If yes, which state or federal Agency? NYS DEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes —No _Not Applicable The Noyes home makes appropriate use of an existing residentially zoned waterfront property. The deck reconstrucction depicted in this application complies with environmental design factors published by the NYS DEC and the DOS Coastal Management Proeram, Southold Local Law No. 6, 2004 and the Southold LWRP The shoreline will remain in its same configuration There will be no impairment of waterflow or navigation during or after the =air and maintenance work has been completed and there wull be no work in the wetland. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable There are no known historic or archeologically significant features on this site. 2 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes _No X Not Applicable The Qroposed project is rebuilding an existing deck attached to the house. The view and vista of the harbor/ cove will not be adversely or even noticeably affected by the proposed maintenance work.This house and deck system was built prior to the adoption of the LWRP by the Town of Southold. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable The Noyes' shoreline is located along the south shore Chocomount Cove and is acknowledged to be in a flood-prone area• and there is wave exposure at this site. This is a long-standing structure which has demonstrated its ability to withstand the elements including inundation waves and ice but has suffered from deterioration of the wood components The work proposed is required to maintain and restore structural integrity of the without adversely impacting the natural features of the site. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable This project will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island. The shoreline is at the bottom of the hydrologic gradient of the water table which is within the exchange area between marine salt water and natural ground water Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes _ No Not Applicable This project is necessary to rebuild a deck. The work is clear of the marine waters and tidal wetlands and other significant Coastal fish and Wild life habitat. Soil retention capability and scour / erosion protection of the site will not change as a result of this project. The preservation of the bank armor is desirable to maintain water quality and fish and wildlife habitat quality and this project will not degrade the habitat or the shoreline protection. 3 Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this project No emissions will be generated by the shorefront erosion protection modifications. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes _ No X Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances or solid waste to be generated from this project. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This project is being built on private land The public trust lands and waters constitutes the area between the mean high water line and mean low water line and the resources are from the high tide line out and the deck reconstruction proiect is clear of Public Trust Lands and waters. WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable The deck to be rebuilt is a part of the Noye's home which is located on land zoned for residential use. This project does not usgM a water dependent use It is not likely that a change in zoning or land use could be under taken at this site without significant opposition thus is suitable use for this location. 4 Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This project is to rebuild a deteriorated wood deck for a home that has existed since before existing environmental regulatory programs. The proposed work is, thus, consistent with sustainable use of living resources and will not change the shape, size or the use of the structure which has existed at this site for decades. The deck is utilized by the Noyes family for the quiet enjoyment of the natural resources of the site. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable The property is not used for or in support of any agricultural or aquaculture industries or enterprises. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This property is not used for or in support of any energy or mineral mining or processing operations and the deck reconstruction does not represent an energy or mineral mining activity. PREPARED BY Keith B.Neilson,P.E. TITLE Agent DATE ARril 25, 2011 5 I • t APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. rr YOURNAME: t��C�c6 A� pp zd' (Last name,first name,m' dle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted IN 2 o r,�_2001 Signature Print Name d'c" Form TS t Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com April 27,2011 Ms. Jill Doherty, President Southold Board of Trustees APR s 20',l P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 --- Re: Noyes Family Propeity, Fishers Island Shorefront Protection Restoration Chocomount Cove Dear Ms. Doherty: On behalf of Nicholas Noyes, we enclose herewith the following in support of his permit application for Deck Reconstruction on Fishers Island. ➢ Four prints each of plans titled: Project: "Deck Reconstruction" Waterway: Chocomount Cove Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Applicant: Nicholas B. Noyes Date: April 25, 2011 ➢ Four copies of the Southold Board of Trustees permit application, SEQR-Part 1, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, amount of $250.00 payable to the Town of Southold. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, INCH. teith B. Neilson, P.E. KBNJm Enclosures CC: Mr.Nicholas Noyes NYS DEC: Environmental Permits File: 09-08-2146 NOYES N .�....... 'O u" I! ate/ W U ) _II SN]IY• 19 FISHEf2s `"„ n A a21 �I N �t�NP+l3 xa I C°„} 4- ap A a SOUND n a , F !� 16 t.s •l /•_ A6 13 I�11 Si I`I • 19 _ PROJECT. REBUILD •00 EXISTING DECK c V `N/F PROPERTY „1 ' \ of DWYERAmf la 03 LOCATION 1`�IAP REFERENce CAAW:12M N/F PROPERTY CR•Prflc SCA.E of KIDD . 1000 0 100o IN YARDS f NOTES: 1. ELEVATION DATUM IS NAVD'88. ". 2. TIDE DATA 15 TAKEN FROM 2Otl NOAA TIDE SITE TABLES REFERENCE:NOANK MYSTIC RNER- NEW LONDON PROPERTY .: .... . ,. OF NOYESi `'' 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: `N/F PROPERTY OF REBUILD 600:SF OF WOOD PATIO DECK F95HER5 ISLAND.: +"� ! INCLUDING EASTING PERIMETER BENCH AND DEVELOPMENT::: NEW POST SUPPORTED GABLE RAIL, . „:.:'" LANDWARD OF THE FLAGGED TIDAL CORP : . . .. ..:` WETLANDS AND THE APPARENT HIGH WATER <: PQ LINE. ( O� 4 PROJECT RECONSTRUCT A STANDING PATIO DECK • - - - •:: 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT O\1 1=ALL A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE Cw llc SCALE t too NOT CONSTRUCTION CONTRP DOCUMENTS. `100 0 1� ATOWN BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: -- WEST: WEST: EAST: BARRON V.KIDD FISHERS ISLAND GYNTHIA DWYER 3838 OAKLAWN RD SUITE 725 DEVELOPMENT CORP. 532 CA14TMOE ST i:i-I i _ i,�i,: 2 TURTLE GREEK VILLAGE PO BOX 464 BEDFORD,NY 10506 DALLAS,TX 75219 FISHERS ISLAND,NY 06390 PROJECT DECK RECONSTRUCTION LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD pF NEIy SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK WATERWAY:FISHERS ISLAND BOUND DATE: APRIL 25,20T *2 t m APPLICANT NICHOLAS NOTEScc • 0 A <.';.• 1w AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 4 2 68692' F�� OGI 0, INC. �•CKeith B.Nelism,PE O DFESSIONP� 8 Mystic,0 572 806 355-939 FAX 860572756.9 P 0 R EMAIL dockoVsnet.net DWG 09-08-2146 KNth N•Ilwn,Dacko Inc 4!7//70119]6 PM Noyes Dsdo-Recrn9h,w71m I.Mq FISHEFZS •N 0 EDGE OF , \ 5PARTINAALTERNIFLORA � i \ STONE SHOREFRONT ' . - PROTECTION \ T.O.S.PERMIT 7316G \:;- •:c N/F PROPERTY OF BARRON ULMER KID .: _ -- / \ �: N/F PROPERTY OF r.}�` CYNTHIA K DWYER APPROXIMATE UMITS fr OF TIDAL WETLANDS- r ,.y e. BRUSH 11 TO BE VERIFIED BY \ NY.S.D.E.G.t .tj ADPROX COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE PER COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP ADDITIONAL BOULDERS .. SHRU85 ' TOWN OF SOLIMOLD SUFFOUG COUNTY TO BE PLACED IN VOI _DF�K DWELLING E OF LAWN NEW YORK PHOTO NO 38889$3: AS NECESSARY r'.: F.EL 135:FT NA SHEET 45-Fl OF 49:8/29/89 EL 13sFT NAVD TO BE REBUILT \\ r r \\ � E PROPERTY 5 634.03 \ �• �.\ STONE DRIVE NOOYE5 r I N/F PROPER fY OF) FI5HER5 I5LAND; DEVELOPMENT.. �\ \ CORP / \ \g 1\ i ENO / BENCHMARK . . \ •,.- �..\ P.K NAIL 1 / EXISTING GOIVDITIONS ELEVATION DATUM NAVE)88 SURVEY M CME ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, GRAPHIC SCALE V_60' LAND SURVEYING>£ARCHITECTURE,PLLC 30 0 60 PROJECT: DECK RECONSTRUCTION LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD �F E(1/ SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK KEI 9 WATERWAY:FISHERS ISLAND SOUND \ DATE APRIL 25,2011 0 C $ APPLICANT NICHOLAS NOYES ' 0 w AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 4 • __ m , �� OGKO, ING. - 6869� KeYtti B.Neis°n,PE C `� OFESSI0�1P mystic.CT00355 0 PO BOO 572 6939 FAX 860 572 7569 EMAIL dockoOsrler.net DWG 01 Keith Neilson, Docko Inc. 4/27/2011 9:26 AM Noyes_Deck—Reconstruction_2.dwg N N/F PROPERTY OF SOUND v/N i�` FISHERS ISLAND DEVELOPMENT _ CORP. 0.6 n> ARD LJMff of .y SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA�r\ \n—� ��n—�1r"1` ' / � 1 r 1 ( ' _ s APPROXIMATE PAL 7.6 V� . PROPERTY UNE �,; 1 _„ x '• Y 5EC77ON-9 see sheet 4 �� .l ,�- T LF WLF WLF '. STONE SHOREFRONTPROTEGTION I[. Sa ,1! WLF 1. .14'� #10 T.O.S.PERMR 7316G x #7 #8 d # E OF BRUSH I LF \J o 0 0 0 0 WLF #6 ' NEW WOOD POST:1`�1 a EDGE OF LAWN (V- Ith GABLE RAILS(TYP) WLr 14 11.7 )o.e STAIRS TO SE REBUILT 11.8 ♦ UPPERLIMBSOFTIDA-wETLANDe;AS SHRUBS � FLAGGED BY RIGHNRD CANAVAN,PH.D., GME SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST. APPROX COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE PER COASTAL EROSION HAZARD PERIMETER BENCH AREA MAP TCvVN OF SOUTHOLD afto I m I long �10 , ® TO BE REBUILT SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK PHOTO REESTABLISH NON-TURF NO.38.889-83: VEGETATED BUFFER SHEET 45-M OF 49,6/29/88 ALONG TOP OF BANK BACK TO IC-FT EXISTING 000sSF WOOD DECK UNG TO BE RECONSTRU pWEL CTED F.F.ELLING DECK ELL 13xFT 135 SITE: PROPERTY WOOD WALKWAY of NOYES SHED PL IV �/I EW EL_G A A DATUM NAVD 88 SURVEY by GME ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, GRAPHIC SCIALE 1•=20' LAND SURVEYING it ARCHITECTURE,PLLG PROJECT: DECK RECONSTRUCTION 20 10 0 20 LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD pF NFL, SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK WATERWAY FISHERS ISLAND SOUND ��Q.9 KEIT 9 DATE APRIL 25,2011 • D 0 C K 0 y APPLICANT: NICHOLAS NOYES ? AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 m DOGKO, INC. C� Keith B.Nelson,PE C CFO 6692', F� Mystic,CT 06355 0 P 0 OFESSIO"NP\' 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 EMAL docko®snet.net DWG 09-08.2146 Keith Neilson, Docko Inc. 4/27/2011 9:25 AM Noyes_Deck—Reconstruction_3.dwg NOTE THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO DWEWNG DRAINAGE STRUCTURES,GROUND GRADES OR GRADIENTS PROPOSED 2sFT DECK NFNG S EXISTING 600t5F DECK NEW 5UPPORT T(TYP) L EW C ABLE RAILS(T-t ) DECK EL 13tr-T NAVY REESTABLI5H NON-TURF EXISTING PERIMETER BENCH DECK WIDTH VARIES VELETA BUFFER BRUSH TO SE REBUILT TO BE REBUILT II TOP O TC �K RUBS r(f PRO 1' -STONE SHORE IECDON I�1 MATE LO" \ N EX9 , O` T.O.S.PERMIT 731W O O APPROXIMATE L TIDAL ET EXISTING r �pU /BOUNDERS IN TIDAL WETLANDS ':---r— •w—.. .. ;;=t.-a AHWL(SPRING HT-) NOTE STAIRS,RALS,DECK LOADS AND ILLUMINATION LEVELS SEG'TIOIV P. .�. ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL BUILDING CODES. GRAAiICSCALE 1'=10' EXISTING WC63F DECK DECK EL 13tF7 NAVO o s 0 0 EXSTNG DWELLING DECK WIDTH VARIES FLOOR EL 13E DWELLING TO BE REBUILT NEW SUPPORT/RAIL PO5T(7YP) ISTiNO PERIMETER BENCH LJMITS OF GO LNGEROSION FACE OF HOUSELINE TO BE REBUILT T AS FLAGGED DS EW DECK 3TRN0ER(TYP) by GME ASSOCIATES STONE SHORE PROTECTION T.O.S.7316C . erl. Y: :M1�t3 Y •i11+( (i f, 3Xl,nl l e3 S! '.. i \//. 1 .hf Yitl ,a131Y } 111 'xz k (�i1( la(J is A.+ nl 1 N +, 1`• e e z 1¢ '�i .>, <+ i i ` fTn t ° , '`` 1 EXISTING BOULDERS IN TIDAL WETLANDS /�- k:�v. EXISTING GRADE SPARMNA NEW INTERMEDIATE 5UPPORT POST(7YP); S i t. l PATENS EXCAVATE ONLY FOR NEW SUPPORT POSTS NO SOIL REGRADING-NO EROSION CONTROLS REQUIRED wl' Ir / TAMPEXCAVATEO GRAVEL INTOAUGERED POST HOLE TO RESTRAIN SUPPORT POST SEGTIOIV B — B SRAPHC SCALE 1'=0 ELEVATION DATUM NAVD88 6 3 0 6 PROJECT: DECK RECONSTRUCTION LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK .`� F EI��y WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND A, p h 9 DATE: APRIL 25,2011 in O C A A Go v '9¢ APPLICANT: NICHOLAS NOYES • ,r AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 o " z IDOGKO, ING. m < , cP C� Keith B.Nells ,PE C 268692.1 �� Mystic,Cr 06355 O P 0 40FESSIo 860 572 8939 FAX WO 572 7569 EMAL&cko@srtet.ret DWG 01 Keith Neilson, Docko Inc. 4/27/2011 9:24 AM Noyes_Deck—Reconstructlon_4.dwg