HomeMy WebLinkAbout36233-ZTown of Southold Annex
54375 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
8/9/2011
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
No: 35064 Date:
7/14/2011
THIS CERTIFIES that the building WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
Location of Property: 12585 Sound Ave, Mattituck, 1
SCTM #: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 141.-3-38.1
Subdivision: Filed Map No.
conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore
1/1/l 900 pursuant to which Building Permit No.
Lot No.
filed in this officed dated
36233 dated 3/10/2011
was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for
which this certificate is issued is:
PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNAS ON EXISTING MONOPOLE AND
RELATED EQUIPMENT.
The certificate is issued to
Penny George Llnc
(OWNER)
of the aforesaid building.
SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL
ELECTRICAL CERTIHCATE NO.
PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED
36233 7/11/11
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
SOUTHOLD, NY
BUILDING PERMIT
(THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES
WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED)
Permit #: 36233
Date: 3/1012011
Permission is hereby granted to:
Penny George LInc
Attn: Geo L Penny IV
PO BOX 171
Southold, NY 11971
mo~
COLOCATE PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNAS ON
EXISTING MONOPOLE AND INSTALL RELATED EQUIPMENT.
At premises located at:
12585 Sound Ave, Mattituck
SCTM # 473889
Sec/Block/Lot # 141.-3-38.1
Pursuant to application dated
To expire on 3/9/2012.
Fees:
1/1/1900
and approved by the Building Inspector.
ACCESSORY $500.00
CO - ACCESSORY BUILDING $50.00
Total: $550.00
Building Inspector
Form No. 6
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN HALL
765-1802
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF occUPANcy
This application must be filled in by typewriter or ink and submitted to the Building Department with the following:
A. For new building or new use: 1. Final survey of Property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets, and unusual natural or
topographic features.
2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal (S-9 form).
3. Approval ofeleetrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters.
4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of 1% lead.
5. Commercial building, industrial building, multiple residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate
of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building.
6, Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements.
B. For existing buildings (prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses, or buildings and "pre-existing" land uses:
1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, building and unusual natural or topographic
features.
2. A properly completed application and consent to inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is
denied, the Building Inspector shall state the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant.
C. Fees 1. Certificate of Occupancy - New dwelling $50.00, Additions to dwelling $50.00, Alterations to dwelling $50.00,
Swimming pool $50.00, Accessory building $50.00, Additions to accessory building $50.00, Businesses $50.00
2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre-existing BuiIding - $100.00
3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy - $.25
4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy- $50.00
5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy - Residential $15.00, Commercial $15.00
Old or Pre-existing Building:
New Construction:
Location of Property:
House No.
Owner or Owners of Property: ~ ~-~5
Suffolk County Tax Map No 1000, Section
Subdivision
Date.
(check one)
Permit No.
Street
Block
Filed Map.
Date of Permit. 3 - i 0 - ~ [ Applicant:
Health Dept. Approval:
Underwriters Approval:
Planning Board Approval:
Final Certificate:
Request for: Temporary Certificate
Foe Submitted: $ ~, ~'C~qZ'k ~,
Hamlet
Lot
Lot:
(check one
Applic~ Signature
Town Hall Annex
54375 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971 0959
Telephone (631 ) 765-1802
Fax (631 ) 765-9502
Foiler. richort~,town.so uthold, ny. us
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRICIAL COMPLIANCE
SITE LOCATION
ssued To: Penny Lumber
Address: 12585 Sound Ave City: Mattituck St: NY Zip: 11952
36233 Section: 141 Block: 3 Lot: 38."
I VVA~ EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE
IContractor: DBA: Complete WiFeless Cont. License No:
SITE DETAILS
Office Use Only
Commerical Outdoor 1st Floor Pool
New Renovation 2nd Floor Hot Tub
Addition Survey Attic Garage
INVENTORY
Service 3 ph Hot Water GFCI Recpt
Main Panel NC Condenser Single Recpt
Sub Panel NC Blower Range Recpt
Transformer Appliances Dryer Recpt
Disconnect Switches Twist Lock
Other Equipment: 200a power to 2 control panels at cell site
Ceiling Fixtures [~l HID Fixtures
Wall Fixtures I I Smoke Detectors
Recessed Fixtures~ CO Detectors
Fluorescent Fixture ~ Pumps
Emergency Fixturel~ Time Clocks
Exit Fixtures [--.I TVSS
Notes:
Inspector Signature:
Date: July 11 2011
81-Cert Electrical Compliance Form
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
MARTIN H. $IDOR
Chair
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
JAMES H. RICH III
DONALD J. WILCENSKI
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
November 1,2011
John J. Coughlin, Esq.
Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP
36 North New York Avenue
Huntington, NY 11743
RE:
Site plan for Metro PCS ~ Penny Lumber
Located: Penny Lumber 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck
S CTM# 1000-141.-3 -38.1
Dear Mr. Coughlin:
As per your request, the Planning Staff conducted a site inspection of the above property
on Thursday October 28, 2011 where the site work was determined to be in conformance
with your approved site plan.
This letter does not condone any changes fi.bm the approved site plan and approvals from
other agencies; Planning Board approval is required prior to any significant changes to
the site. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process do not
hesitate to call this office.
Sincerely,
Martin H Sidor' /2~
Chairman
Cc:
Planning Board
Heather Lanza, Planning Director
Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector
Jamie Richter, Town Engineer
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPT.
765-18O2
INSPECTION
~]~ FOUNDATION 1ST
[ ] ROUGH PLBG.
[ ]INSULATION
[ ]FINAL
[ ]fiRE SAFETY INSPECTION
] F~ERESmTJNTC0~mUCn0. [ ]F&qE.ES~T~XTmETR~I~0.
] FOUNDATION 2ND
[ ] FRAMING / STRAPPING
[ ] FIREPLACE & 0HIMNEY
REMARKS:
DATE '-/-~-//-~/I
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPT.
765-1802
INSPECTION
FOUNDATION 1ST
FOUNDATION 2ND
FRAMING / STRAPPING
[ ] ROUGH PLBG.
[ ] I~ION
[~]'~INAL
[ ] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY [ ] FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION
[
REMARKS:
] FIRERESlSTAHTCONSTRUCTIOfl [ ] FIRERESlSTANTPENETRATIOfl
DATE
INSPECTOR
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN HALL
SOUTHOLD, NY 11971
TEL: (631) 765-1802
FAX: (631) 765-9502
SoutholdTown.NorthFork. net
Examined ,20__
Approved 20__
Disapproved a/c
Expiration ,20.__
PERMIT NO.
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Do you have or need the following, before applying?
Board of Health
4 sets of Building Plans
Planning Board approval
Survey.
Check
Septic Form
N.Y.S.D.E.C.
Trustees
Flood Permit
Storm-Water Assessment Form
Contact: Attorneys for Applicant
Mailto:Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin,
LLP
36 North New York Ave.
Building Inspector
~--~ ~~ICATION FOR BUILDING PERI'VIIT
~'~// J~k~ ~ 2~]~0 /V / Date ,20
this ~pplic&~,~ .~l~J~~ly filled in by typewriter or in i~ ~d submi~ed to ~e B~lding Inspector wi~ 4
sets of pla ~ ack--scale.ce according to schedule.
b. ~l~n showing location of lot ~d of buildings on premises, relationshp to adjoining premises or public sffee~ or
areas, and wate~ays.
c. The work covered by ~is application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit.
d. Upon approval of ~s application, ~e Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicam. Such a permit
shall be kept on the premises available for impection ~oughout the work.
e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in p~ for ~y p~pose what so ever until ~e Building Inspector
issues a Certificate of Occup~cy.
[ Eve~ building permit shall expire if~e work au~orized h~ not commenced within 12 monks a~er ~e dine of
issuance or h~ not been completed within 18 monks from such date. If no zoffing mendments or o~er regulations ~fecting ~e
property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Impector may au~od~, in writing, ~e extension of~e pe~it for ~
addition six monks. Therea~er, a new permit shall be mq~md,
APPLICATION IS HE.BY MADE to the Building Dep~ment for ~e issu~ce of a Building Pemit pmu~t to ~e
B uitding Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk Co~, New York, ~d other applicable Laws, Ordi~ces or
Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition ~ heroin described. The
appUcant agrees to comply wi~ all applicable laws, ordin~ces, building code, housing code, ~d regulmions, ~d to admit
authorized inspectors on premises ~d in building for necess~ inspections,
MetroPCS New York, LLC
(Sign~ureofapplieantorname ift~gi~t~J~p) .
~lm~a k~t~b/lJilbt
bom any~
5 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 1053~
(Mailing address of applicant)
State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder
Lessee
Nameofownerofpremises Georqe L. Penny. Inc.
i .... .Limited Liability I;qmpan7, ?s.on~the tax roll or
t aP,mlcarlLl~ a~llJlll/llt~O~.a,'~Jl~reo~uuiy aumonzea omcer
~me and ti~Cl~g~ officer)
3uilders License No.
'umbers LicenseNo. N/A
'ctricians License No.
',r Trade's License No. N/A
land on which propos, ed work will be done:
~B~°und Avenue, Mattltuck, NY
latest deed)
'6N'd&ber Street
Tax Map No. 1000 Section
don
141
Hamlet
Block 3
Filed Map No.
Lot 38.1
Lot
2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction:
a. Existing useandoccupancy Industrial Use and Public Utility Wireless Teleconmunications
Faci I lty
b. Intended use and occupancy. Same as above
3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration
Re air Remoyal Demolitiqn Other Work Col ocate public uti-T~y
v/ir.e~.ss ~.el.ecqramunicatlg~s.on e.xjs ~-t-~'~-0~ r~bn-6-~o].e, a~c~. '.'-7_,' (Description)
.in~z~mm rq~ea equlpmen~ as aepic~ea in ~ne pjans sUom~eaneremzn.
~. ~st~mateu ~ost $75,1}00.00 'Fee
(To be paid on filing this application)
5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units N/^ Number of dwelling units on each floor
If garage, number of cars
Industrial use and
6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use./Public Utility wireless
Te£ecommunxcations
Facility
7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth
Height. Number of Stories Existing 100' telecmranunications monopole
Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front
Depth Height
/ Proposed 10'xl6'
8. Dimensions of entire new construction:'Front
Height Number of Stories
/ntXX Rear ~'
9.
S
ze of lot:
10. Date of Purchase 7/13/1982
Name of Former Owner
1 I. Zone or use district in which premises are situated
Rear
Number of Stories 'No change to height of
eqq4.pment area monopole
Rear .Depth
Depth '
Elizabeth G. Penny, as Executrix under the
Last Will and T~qfam~n? nf George L. Penny,
III
Light Industrial District
12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES __ NO X
13. Will lot be re-graded? YES__ NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES x NO__
George L. c/o 12585 Sound Ave
14. Names of Owner ofpremises P~nnv. Inn_ Address .Ma~tti.tuck~, NY PhoneNo.
_ ~ NameofArchitectMIM Design Gro~l~, Inc. Address ~azle~., N,'I fl77.~0 PhoneNo 732-888-6210
Name of Contractor Address Phone No.
15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO __
* IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERIVIITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
b. Is this property within 300 feet ofatidal wetland? * YES__ NO X
* IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
X
16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines.
17. If elevation at any pOint on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey.
18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES__
· IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY.
NO X
STATE OF NEW YORK)
SS:
COUNTY OF//J~a~/~a/l,.r/~
l~D% ~ [~t r~(~' being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant
ividnal signing contract) above named.
is the Lessee :'~': :;"~ '"~ ":
2 (Contractor, Agent, Corporat~ Officer} etc.)
of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to ntake and file this application;
that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be
performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith.
Sworn to before me this/~
~q~ day of /-t ~-(.q/~ S/-
Notary Public
DIANE LAVELLE
NOTARY PUBLIC, State Ot New York
No, 01LA6/J27870
Oua]ifie, d In Westchsster Countyz..~
Commission Expires July 19, 20 ~
20 FJ ~, Met elmer
~ - t~Sig~ature of Applicant
TO:
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
FORM NO. 3
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL
DATE: January 25,2010
Re: Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLC for
Metro PCS New York, LLC
36 North New York Avenue
Huntington, New York 11743
Please take notice that your application dated January 14, 2010
For permit to colocate a wireless facility & install equipment at
Location of property: 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck NY
County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 141 Block 3 Lot 38.1
ls returned herewith and disapproved on the tbllowing grounds:
The proposed co-location in the LI District is permitted.
The proposed construction requires Planning Board site plan review & special exception
approval per Section 280-72 of the Town Code.
! - Authorized Signature
CC: file, Planning Board
Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require
further review by the Southold Town Building Department.
FOR INTERrIAL USE ONiY
,SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION
Initial Determination
Date: ~// /~' / /O .~..
Date Sent: o!/ /¥/ /o
Project Name:
Project Address:
Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- ,/'/-)Z,/ ~ - ~¢.~/Zoning District:
Request..~__~r/~_ __¢~ ~-h~/ ~,~<~ ~u,u j¢-- ~ ~;,~.~.;,.,.~,,¢O
(Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to
proposed use or uses should be submitted.)
Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted:
Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: ?~/~
Signature of Building nspector
Planning Department (P D.) Referral:.
P.D. Date I~ceived :__ 'Date of Comment: ti / (' '~ / ,2 ~ /o
e[u6.0EP1 ............ Signature of Planning Dept.~taff Reviewer
TOWN 0[ SOUTH0ID
Final Determination
Date: / /
Decision:
Signature of Building Inspector
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
Chair
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
JAMES H. RICH III
DONALD J. WILCENSKI
February 15,2011 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTttOLD
John J. Coughlin, Esq.
Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP
36 North New York Avenue
Huntington, NY 11743
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
Re~
Approval: Special Exception for Metro PCS at Penny Lumber
Located at 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck
SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zoning District: LI
Dear Mr. Coughlin:
The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held
on Monday, February 14, 2011:
WHEREAS, this application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a
wireless antenna at a height of 75 feet to the outside of an existing 100' antenna
support structure and install related equipment on the ground at the premises located
on a 3.8 acre parcel 400 feet east of Lipco Road in the LI Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the above-referenced request for Special Exception Approval for a public
utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on April 23, 2010
including a site plan prepared by Lou Moglino, AIA, dated March 12, 2010; and
WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with
an independent technical consultant retained by the Town to assist in the review
process; and
WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met;
and
WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board distributed the
application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments; and
WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies having jurisdiction and by the
independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town were received and
accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the
site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under
the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section
Metro PCS at Penny Lumber
Page Two
February 15, 2011
617.7, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action;
and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board agreed to waive the requirement to
construct an entirely new antenna support structure that meets the Town Code,
pursuant to §280-76.2F. It was determined that the pro-existing antenna support
structure, though not in compliance with the Town Code, could be allowed due to the
finding by the Planning Board that the structure is already located in a place that would
comply the same as any alternate locations, and the new antennas will be constructed
to be as unobtrusive as possible; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed
the above-referenced project and recommended the proposed project be found
consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, a public hearing was held and closed by the Southold
Town Planning Board regarding the special exception consideration and site plan; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this
Unlisted Action and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and
granted a Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, on November 12, 2010, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the
plan and certified that the proposed action is a permitted use in this Light Industrial
Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the application to determine
whether it satisfied the requirements for a special exception pursuant to Town Code
Section 280-142 as follows:
1. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or
of properties in adjacent use districts. The tower already exists and the new antennas
are flush-mounted to reduce visibility as much as possible. The equipment cabinets
aro not visible from outside the property.
2. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally
established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of
permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. The property is used for
industrial purposes.
3. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of
the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location. The
antenna support structure already exists, and the facility has been found to meet the
Maximum Permissible Exposure limits set by the Federal Communications
Commission.
4. That the use is in harmony with and promotes the general purposes and intent of this
chapter.
Metro PCS at Penny Lumber
Pa,qe Three
February 15, 2011
5. That the use is compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the
neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility,
scale and over-all appearance. The antennas are flush-mounted as close to the
existing structure to minimize the visual obtrusiveness as much as possible.
6. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily
accessible for fire and police protection; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the application to determine
whether it met the additional standards for a Special Exception Approval for a Wireless
Communication Facility pursuant to §280-73B as follows:
1. Modification of the existing facility for a co-location of another wireless carrier has
been found to be a public necessity, in that it is required to meet current or
expected demands of the telecommunications provider and to render adequate
service to the public.
2. The applicant is co-locating their antennas on an existing antenna support
structure.
3. It is more feasible to co-locate the antennas on the existing structure rather than
construct a new structure. A new structure is not desirable because it would
contribute to visual clutter; therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby finds that the standards for
Special Exception Approval have been met; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the action is
consistent under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization
Program; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning hereby grants a waiver of 280-76.1A.,
"Pre-existing antenna support structures and antennas not in compliance"; and be it
further
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval for the Special
Exception Consideration for Metro PCS at Penny Lumber.
If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please
contact the Planning Board Office.
Very truly yours,
Martin H. Sidor
Chairman
Encl.
CC;
Town Engineer
Building Department
Town Hall Annex
54375 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1802
ro,qer, ri~ertd~w(~.~s) o76u~'~oC]~ .ny. us
;REQUESTED BY:
Company Name:
Name:
BUII,I~ING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION
/
Date: '~/1t/ll
License No.:
Address:
Phone No.:
*Name:
*Address'.'
*Cross Street:
*Phone No.:
JOBSITE INFORMATION: (*Indicates required information)
Permit No.: ~ b '~, '~ "~
Tax Map Distdct: 1000 Section: } t~ I Block: '~ Lot: ~', j
*BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK (Please Pdnt Clearly)
(Please Circle All That Apply)
*is job ready for inspection:
*Do you need a Temp Certificate:
YES / NO Rough In
YES / NO
Temp Information (If needed]
*Service Size: 1 Phase
*New Service: Re-connect
Additional Information:
Final
Underground Num~f Met.~S.-"C~nge of Service Overhead
PAYMENT DUE WITH APPLICATION
82-Request for Inspection Form
02/~3/2010 !2:33 518-486-4487 NYSDOS CODES PAGE 81/81
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE
~"~ .... / "1 Division of Code Enforcement and Administration
/
~ ~ · · Phone: (51S)474-4073 Fax:(518)q86-d457
TECHNICAL BULLETIN
Code Effective Date: Jannary 1, 2003, January 1, 2008
~,ource Document: 19NYCRRL Bttilding Code qf New York State OtCNYS)
¥opic: Communication Towers, Cellular Tower~, nnd Wind Generators
"his doctrment is to c]arify the applicatio~ of thc requirements o£Bmldi~g Code of New York State
(BCNYS) section 3108, e~titled "Radio and Television To,i, cm" Section 3108,1, entitled general,
Subject to tfie provision$ of Chapter 16 and the reqmremet~t.r of Cbs?tnt 15 governing the fire-
resistonce-rafingx of buildings for the support of roof structut'es, radio and teievision towers ~hall bc
designed and constructed as herein provided
~?uilcling Code of New York &ate (BCNYS) Chapter 16. entitled structural design, contains the seismic
'equimnents for buildings and Chapter 15, entitled mol assemblies arid rooftop structures, contains
;pecific requirements for rooftop structures in section 1509 Section 3t08.4, states thal towers shall be
:lesigned to resist wind loads in accordance with TIA/EIA 222-E, "Structural Standards for Steel
Al~tenna Towers and Ante'a/la Suplaortirlg St;q. mtures." ~6~"V -~J-~
Although EIMTIA 222-E contains provisions which are apphcable to f'rec-stmnding towers, it ~s our
>pimon that A~icle ! 8 of thc Executive Law, tlxc enabling legislation for the Uniform Fire Prevcmtioa
and Building Code (Uniform Code). does not authorize regulation of fi'ee-st,,nding commxmJcanon
towers, cellular towers, or wind generators, which are not associated w~th a building. When a tower is
installed o~ a building, section 3108,1 is applicable. When a free-~anding tower is accompanied by a
building for equipment, fl~e building is regulated by the code.
Rnnald E. Piester, A.I.A., Director
Division of Code Enforcement and Administration
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK
In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC
At the premises:
12585 Sound Avenue
Mattituck, New York
Section 141, Block 3, Lot 38.1
STATE OF NEW YORK )
)SS.:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )
AUTHORIZATION
OF OWNER
(__&ec~oc~,-e~ /.~."-~qthr3t.~ iV , being duly sworn, deposes and says:
I am the owner in fee of the premises known as Section 141, Block 3, Lot 38.1 (the
"Premises" hereafter), and do hereby authorize MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS' hereafter),
and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal approvals as may be necessary for
constructing or installing on the Premises such antennas, support structures, and related equipment as
MetroPCS may require for the establishment of its public utility wireless telecommunication facility.
As such, I will fully cooperate with MetroPCS and its agents in obtaining any required Approvals.
Sworn to before me this
I~ ~lay of ~.¢ctcfl~4,2009
to of New Y~
5298
Corem Qualified in Suffolk County
Ission Expires February 5, 20 ~'~
NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN. LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
06 Noa'rI-x NEw YORK AVENUE
HUNTII~OTON, NEw Yoax 117413
January 5, 2010
BY HAND
TELEPHONE: (681) 425-4100
F~sx~x~,~: (681) 425-4104
Building Department
Town of Southold Annex Building
54375 Route 25
Southold, NY 11971
RE:
MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7312)
Building Permit Application
Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility
Premises: 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY
SCTM#: 1000-141 - 3 - 38.1
l)car Sir or Madam:
¢ )n hehalf of MetroP('S New York, LLC CMetroPCS"), submitted herewith is the captioned Applicatio,q
as tbllows:
i. Fown of Southold Building Permit Application;
Property Owner's Authorization;
3. Building Permit Application fee: MetroPCS Check No. 4654 in the amount of $500.00, pursuaut
to Town Code Section 280-74A(1)(a);
4. Two (2) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report prepared by
Pinnacle Telecom Group and dated October 14, 2009, demonstrating the prOJect's compliance
with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations pursuant to Code §§ 280-74B(1)(ai and
280-70(J);
5 ~lwo (2) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report prepared by Semaan Engineering Solutions,
~.LC, and dated August 18, 2009, documenting the facility's structural compliance with !ocal,
state and federal codes pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(b);
Cop~ of MetroPCS's FCC License, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(c);
FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, pursuant to Code §280-/4B(1)(c);
8. National Fn',ironmental Policy Act (NEPA) Screening Report, prepared by EBI Consulting, and
datea October 22, 2009, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(c);
9. Gap and Propagation Maps, pursuant to Code §§ 280-74B(1)(d) and lek
10. Search Ring Map, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)le);
11. Affidavit of Radiofrequency Engineer, pursuant to Code §280-74B( 1 )(e)
12. CD ROM contaning digital files of propagation and search ring maps, pursuant to (:ode §280-
74B(1)0);
13 Copy of Deed, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(g);
14. Copies ot the tbllowing License/Lease Agreements, pursuant to Code §280-74B( 1 )lg):
a. Site l.icense Agreement, between T-Mobile Northeast LLC and MetroPCS New York,
LL(', dated September 25, 2009;
b. Site l,easc with Option, between George E. Penny, Inc. and Ommpomt Facilities
Me~oPCS New York, LLC
12585 Sound Avenue, Ma~ituck (Me~o Site:7312)
January5,2010
Page 2 of 2
Network 2, LLC, dated September 25, 2002.
15. Property survey prepared by Barrett Bonacci & Van Weele, PC, dated June 30, 2007; and
16. Four (4) sets of Construction Drawings with Site Plans and Elevations, prepared by MTM Design
Group, Inc. and dated December 21, 2009. The drawings include a compound landscape plan, in
accordance with the requirements of Code §§ 280-70M, 280-71A(2)(b)(ii) and 280-
71A(2)(a)(ii)(3).
You will note in reviewing the above, and in furtherance of the recent amendments to Town Code Article
XVII addressing the zoning of "Wireless Communications Facilities," MetroPCS has attempted to design
its proposal so as to comply with Code § 280-71A, as well as §§ 280-70 and 280-74.
Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain
Very truly yours,
RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
gl'
JC:mk
Enclosures
Rt , NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
.ATTORNEYS AT LAW
36 NORTH NEW YOI~K AVENUE
HUNTINGTON, Ngw Yom~ 11743
T]/LEPHONE: (6~1) 425-4100
FACSI14ILE: (631) 425-4104
March 17,2011
VIA UPS
Building Department
Town of Southold Annex Building
54375 Route 25
Southold. NY 11971
Attn.: Ms. Connie Bunch
MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7312)
CO Fee Check for Building Permit Number 36233
Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility
Premises: 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY
SCTM#: 1000-141 3 38.1
Dear Ms. Bunch:
On behalf of MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS"), and pursuant to your request, we enclose,
herewith, MetroPCS New York, LLC check number 6979 payable to Town of Southold in the sum
of $50.00, which sum represents the required Certificate of Occupancy fee.
Should you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please advise.
Very truly yours,
R~, NIJ~LSEN, HUBER 8~COUGHLI/N, LLP
lViarisa Knoth
/mk
Enclosure
NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
TELEPHONIC: (031) 425-4100
FACSX~XnE: (031) 42§-4104
March 9,2011
VIA UPS
Building Department
[own of Southold Annex Building
54375 Route 25
Southold, NY 11971
RE:
MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7312)
Building Permit Application
Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility
Premises: 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY
SCTM#: 1000-I41 - 3 - 38.1
[)car Sir or Madam:
On behalf of MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS"), and in furtherance of our telephone conference
with your office, we enclose MetroPCS New York, LLC check number 6948 payable to Town of
Southold in the sum of $500.00, which sum represents the required Building Permit Application fee. This
check is being forwarded to you as a replacement for the previously filed MetroPCS check number 4654
dated September 29, 2009, which has long since expired.
Wc respectfully request that you return check number 4654 to us at your earliest convenience.
Once the Building Permit has been issued~ kindly call our office so that we may send a representative to
pick up the Permit.
Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain
Very truly yours.
R~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
.l.lC:ew
Enclosure
NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
ATTOi~4EYS AT LAW
HUNTXN~TON, N~r Yo~ 117~3
T~L~P~o~r~: (6~31) 425-4100
Mm'ch 14, 2011
VIA UPS and E-Mail
Mr. Richard Molar
MctroPCS New York, LLC
5 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, New York 10532
MetroPCS New York, LLC Site No.: NY 7312
Town of Southold Building Permit No. 36233
Premises: Penny Lumber
12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York
SCTM No.: Section 141, Block 3, Lot 38.1
Dear Rich:
With regard to the captioned site, we enclose herewith the Building Penuit package, including the stamped
approved plans, received from the Town of Southold Building Department today. The Building Permit expires
on March 9, 2010. Also enclosed are the following: (1) MetroPCS Check Number 4654 (dated September 29,
2009), which was voided and returned to us by the Town (a replacement check had been filed); and (2) the
Town's Application for Certificate of Occupancy, whkh was included with the Building Permit documents.
Once construction is completed, the Town requires that a Certificate of Occupancy be obtained for this permit.
A Certificate of Occupancy for the permit is the final step in legalizing the premises. Occupancy without
issuance of such Certificates by the Town of Southold is considered illegal. Please advise if you want our office
to assist you in obtaining the Certificate. If we do not hear from you in that regard, we will assume that you will
be securing the Certificate. In any event, please forward a copy of the Certificate to our office as soon as it is
received.
Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please do not hesflate to contact the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
By: ....
JC:mk
Enclosures
Cc via email w/o encls.:
Anthony Romanelli
Anthony Cillo
Victoria Brennan
Doug Hall
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK
In the Matter of the application of proposal of MetroPCS New York,
LLC
For Approval to collocate public utility wireless telecommunications
antennas on an existing monopole and install related equipment at the
premises ("Premises"):
12585 Sound Avenue
Mattituck, New York
District 1000, Section 141, Block 3, Lot 38.1
[MetroPCS Site No. NY 7312]
STATE OF NEW YORK )
bd~Xcs~¢ ~cL ) ss.:
COUNTY OF SLTFOLK )
AFFIDAVIT OF
RADIO FREQUENCY
ENGINEER
NICHOLAS BALZANO, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. I am a radio frequency engineer for MetroPCS New York, LLC (hereinafter
"MetroPCS"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in MetroPCS
wireless telecommunications network and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy
these service deficiencies. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications
network in Suffolk County. I am fully familiar with MetroPCS' wireless telecommunications network in
Suffolk County.
2. I submit this affidavit in support of MetroPCS' application for approval to install a
wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. Pursuant to this application, MetroPCS requests
approval to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to an existing monopole and install
related equipment on the ground as depicted in the plans submitted herewith.
3. MetroPCS is considered a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of
New York and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to serve the public within Suffolk
County and throughout much of the United States. MetroPCS strives to provide reliable service
throughout its licensed coverage area.
4. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications network
throughout Suffolk County. Presently, MetroPCS does not maintain any facilities within the Town of
Southold. The proposed facility will allow MetroPCS to provide reliable coverage in the vicinity of the
proposed site. Unreliable service can represent an inconvenience to users of MetroPCS' services and can
have serious consequences during times of emergency or disaster.
5. In order to understand why the proposed antenna site is needed, it is necessary to
understand how MetroPCS' system works from an engineering standpoint. MetroPCS' wireless
telecommunications system is designed so that low powered base stations are strategically located at
determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. Due to such factors as hills, valleys, trees,
buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves, each coverage area or
"cell" is irregularly shaped. With sufficient signal strength from each base station, the MetroPCS user
can reliably transmit, receive or maintain voice or data connections. The sites are ordinarily engineered to
cover a limited area so that an antenna facility will cover only the area surrounding it but will not interfere
with other sites in the system.
6. MetroPCS has established design criteria so that its wireless network will provide reliable
wireless service to its customers, whether those customers are on the street, in a vehicle, or in a building.
Providing reliable service to MetroPCS' customers within vehicles and buildings is critical for MetroPCS
to provide the quality of wireless service that customers demand and successfully compete with other
wireless providers.
7. To meet customer demands and expectations, MetroPCS strives to provide In-Vehicle (or
In-Car) coverage and In-Building coverage. These coverage levels represent the minimum signal strength
and reliability of service needed to transmit, receive or maintain a voice or data connection at the mobile
handset as the environment changes.
8. MetroPCS has reliable In-Vehicle coverage when a customer can place or receive a call
within a vehicle successfully across 95% of a site's coverage area. In-Vehicle coverage generally results
in unreliable in-building coverage. Since the signal level is stronger closer to the antenna site than further
away from the antenna site, there will be some coverage within buildings close to the site.
9. MetroPCS has reliable In-Building Residential coverage when a MetroPCS customer can
place or receive a call while in a building that is three stories or less in height successfully across 95% of
the site's coverage area. This type of coverage will typically provide reliable coverage over the majority
of the cell coverage area; however in some areas, and specifically at the outer geographic boundaries of
the cell site's coverage area, coverage will be restricted and will likely lead to customers dissatisfaction if
customers try to place or receive a call inside a windowless room, cellars or emergency shelters.
10. MetroPCS has reliable In-Building Commercial overage when a MetroPCS customer can
place or receive a call while in a building that is greater than three stories in height successfully across
95% of the site's coverage area. In-Building Commercial coverage is targeted for urban residential
centers and business districts with high-rise buildings, and suburban business centers. Coverage issues
may still occur in hard to serve locations such as within elevators and parking structures.
11. To provide these levels of coverage, MetroPCS has scientifically determined the strength
of the wireless signal ("signal strength") necessary to provide these levels of coverage. Because wireless
signals are attenuated (i.e. degraded or partially blocked) by obstructions such as trees, automobile
windows, automobile sheet metal, and building materials such as wood, brick and metal, a wireless signal
must be of sufficient strength in the ambient environment (i.e. outside with no obstructions) to reliably
penetrate into automobiles and buildings.
12. Wireless signal strength is measured on a logarithmic power scale referenced to 1 milli-
watt of power. Signal strength levels less than 1 milli-watt being negative. The smaller the negative dBm
number, the stronger the signal. For example, -75dBm is a stronger signal level than -85dBm. An
ambient signal level of -95dBm would provide reliable In-Vehicle coverage on MetroPCS' system.
MetroPCS' system requires an ambient signal level of -85dBm to provide reliable In-Building
Residential coverage, and an an~bient signal level of-75dBm to provide reliable In-Building Commercial
coverage. These signal level requirements provide the basis for MetroPCS' design criteria.
13. MetroPCS' design criteria for wireless facilities serving an area are based upon providing
95% reliable signal over a site's coverage area to ensure reliable service for customers. This standard
reflects a business judgment that 100% reliability is an unrealistic goal at this time due to financial,
technical and environmental constraints. A 95% level of reliability is consistent with the level of service
provided by MetroPCS' competitors and is the standard in the industry. Providing service at this level
allows MetroPCS to satisfy customers' demands and compete on an equal footing with competitors
serving the market.
14. To achieve the 95% reliable design goal, MetroPCS conducts extensive analysis based
upon MetroPCS' technology and the area served.
15. In order to eliminate the service deficiency in a particular area, MetroPCS performs
signal propagation studies to determine the height and location of the needed cell site. Based on its
studies, MetroPCS determined that an antenna facility would have to be established within a narrowly
defined search area in order to remedy the service gap in question. In this case, we determined that the
installation of the proposed facility will allow MetroPCS to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the
Premises.
16. The proposed antennas must be affixed at least as high as those depicted on the plans
submitted herewith in order to ensure that reliable service can be afforded to MetroPCS users in the
vicinity of the site. The location and height of the antennas is determined by some or all of the following
factors: availability of existing structures, willingness of property owners to enter into leases, drive test
data, location of existing antenna sites in the area, topography in the surrounding area, land cover features
in the area such as buildings and foliage, and the results provided by computer propagation software that
enables radio frequency engineers to predict the anticipated signal propagation at a given height and
location.
17. In order to illustrate the effect that the proposed site would have on coverage in its
vicinity, propagation maps have been prepared demonstrating the different coverage levels summarized
above. The maps depict the areas presently enjoying reliable service in the vicinity, and the area to be
served by the proposed site. As the maps indicate, the proposed facility is of vital importance to
MetroPCS' efforts to provide reliable service to the area in question. Unless this application is granted,
MetroPCS will be unable to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises.
18. The antennas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service or public safety
telecommunications in the surrounding area.
Sworn to before me this
/7~0' dayof ~.r,c~g~;,2009.
NOTARY PUBLIC
~ANO
NY7312 Search Ring
NORTHRD
CRESCENT W
°%.
0
Brus~%~re
~C
Town of
Southold
Site lB NY7312A
12585 Sound Ave
I~attituck, New York
Map Scale: 1" = 0.85 mi
Town Boundaries
Subject Site
Proposed Sites
MAP I
Existing
Coverage
Dec. 11 , 2009 Prepared by
Nico Balzano
Town of
Southold
Site ID NY7312A
12585 Sound Ave
MaAituck, New York
Map Scale: 1" = 0.85 mi
Town Boundaries
Subject Site
Proposed Sites
-85 dBm In Building Residential
MAP 2
Coverage From
Subject Site
Dec. 11 , 2009 Prepared by
Nico Batzano
;H LN
CRESCENT W
La~aki
o%
Town of
Southold
Site ID NY73t2A
12585 Sound Ave I
Mattituck, New York
R/tap Scale: 'I" = 0,85 mi
Dec, 11 . 2009
Town Boundaries
Subject Site
Proposed Sites
-75 dBm in Building Commercial
MAP 3
Coverage From
Subject Site
Prepared by
Nico Balzano
Town of
Southold
Sits iD NY7312A
12585 Sound Ave
Mattituck, New York
Map Scale: 1" = 0.85 mi
Town Boundariss
Subject Site
Proposed Sites
-95 dBm in Vehicle
MAP 4
Coverage From
Subject Site
Dec, 11 , 2009 Prepared by
Nico Balzano
Federal Communications Commission
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
Radio Station Authorization
93
LICENSEE NAME: r4et~oPCS AWS. LLC
~ARK A. STACHIW
~ETROPCS AWS, LLC
Bt44 WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 800
DALLAS T~ 75231
FCC Registration Number (FRN)
0015005598
Cell Sign File Number
WOGA731 0002773870
Radio Service
Grant Date
Effec~ve Date
11-29-2006
Expiration Date
Print Date
Market Number Channel Block J Sub-Market Designator
REAO01 O 0
i i st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date 3rd Build-out Date I
t 4th Build-out Date
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS
Conditions:
Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communications Act of ] 934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 309(h), this license is subject to
the following conditions: This license shal! not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the
?requenaies designated inthe license beyond theterm thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the
ilicense nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of
,1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. Section 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the fight of use or control conferred by
%e~c_tjon 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 4;' U.S,C, Section 606.
j To view the geographic areas associated with the license, go to the Universal Licensing System (ULS) homepage at
. hffp://wireless,fcc,gov/uls and select "license Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information.
Call Sign
Page 2 of :!
File Number Print Date
000~773870 t I -30-2006
FCC 601 - MB
Federal Aviation Administration
Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520
2601 Meacham Blvd.
Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520
Aeronautical Study No.
2009-AEA-3436-OE
Prior Study No.
2004-AEA-2139-OE
Issued Date: 11/17/2009
Marc Harris
HPC Development, LLC
52 Garden Ave.
Wharton, NJ 07885
** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.,
Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning:
Structure:
Location:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Heights:
Antenna - Side Mount NY7312
Mattituck, NY
40-59~27.84N NAD 83
72-32-17.94W
102 feet above ground level (AGL)
114 feet above mean sea level (AMSL)
This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a
hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met:
Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking
and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in
accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2.
This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights,
frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will
void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the
addition of other transmitters, requ/res separate notice to the FAA.
This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be
used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as
indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the
FAA.
This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace
by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or
regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body.
A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) because the
structure is subject to their licensing authority.
Page 1 of 3
If,we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (718) 553-4542. On any future correspondence
concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2009-AEA-3436-OE.
Signature Control No: 663540-120258071
Katie Venticinque
Specialist
Attachment(s)
Frequency Data
cc: FCC
(DNE)
Page 2 of 3
Frequency Data for ASN 2009-AEA-3436-OE
LOW
FREQUENCY
HIGH FREQUENCY
FREQUENCY UNIT ERP
ERP
UNIT
806 824 MHz 500 W
824 849 MHz 500 W
851 866 MHz 500 W
869 894 MHz 500 W
896 901 MHz 500 W
901 902 MHz 7 W
930 931 MHz 3500 W
931 932 MHz 3500 W
932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW
935 940 MHz 1000 W
940 941 MHz 3500 W
1850 1910 MHz 1640 W
1930 1990 MHz 1640 W
2305 2310 MHz 2000 W
2345 2360 MHz 2000 W
1730 1740 MHz 61 dBm
2130 2140 MHz 61 dBm
Page 3 of 3
Structural Analysis Report
Prepared for:
T-Mobile USA
12920 SE 38th Street
Bellevue, WA 98006
ATTN: Ms. Danielle Edson
Structure
Proposed Carrier
Site ID
Site Location
County
Date
Usage
100 ft PennSummit Flagpole
Metro PCS
LI13411B
Mattituck, NY
Suffolk
August 11, 2009
50.1% (pole shaft); 85.0% (anchor bolts)
Semaan Engineering Solutions, LLC
1079 N. 205th Street
Elkhorn, NE 68022
Phone: 402-289-1888
August 11, 2009
Page 1
Introdnction
The purpose of this report is to summarize results of the structural analysis performed on the 100 ft
PennSummit Flagpole located at Mattituck, NY, Suffolk County (site/~I1341 lB). The tower was
originally designed and manufactured by PennSummit (Drawing #Job #29204-0050 dated February
24, 2004). The pole is an 80 fi steel monopole with a 20 ft top mounted concealment cylinder.
Analysis
The tower was analyzed using Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc., Software. The analysis
assumes that the tower is in good, undamaged, and non-corroded condition. The analysis was
performed in conformance with TIA/E1A-222 Rev F and the New York State Building Code for
a basic wind speed of 100 mph and 1/2" radial ice with reduced wind speed (fastest mile). This
wind speed is equivalent to a 120 mph 3-second gust per the IBC 2003. This is in conformance
with the IBC 2003: Section 1609.I.1, Exception (5) and Section 3108.4.
Basic Wind Speed:
Radial Ice:
Code:
100.0 mph
86.6 mph w/0.50" ice
TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Antenna Loads
The following antenna loads were used in the tower analysis.
Existin~ Antennas
Elev. (fi) Qty Antennas Mount Coax (in) Carrier
3 S20045AI LNA Mounted Inside Concealment
95.0 3 RR65-19-XXDP Cylinder (9) 1 5/8
T-Mobile
3 S20045A1 LNA Mounted Inside
85.0 3 RR65-19-XXDP Concealment Cylinder (9) 1 5/8
Proposed Antennas
Elev. (fi) 7 Antennas
75.0 ETW200VSI 2UB
800 10504
Mount
Flush Mounted to Pole
Coax (in)
(6) 7/8
Carrier
Metro PCS
All transmission lines are assumed running inside of pole shaft.
All new access holes shall be reinforced with welded rims that are compatible with the pole and
to be sized and supplied by pole manufacturer.
August 11, 2009
Page 2
Results
The existing monopole is structurally capable of supporting the existing and proposed antennas.
The maximum structure usage is: 50.1% (pole shaft); 85.0% (anchor bolts).
Pole Reactions Original Design Current Analysis
Reactions Reactions % Of Design
750.00 596.56 79.5
13.00 10.12 77.8
Moment (t~-kips)
Shear (kips)
The analysis reactions are less than the design reactions therefore no foundation modifications
are required.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis results, the existing structure meets the requirements per the TIA/EIA-222
Rev F standards for a basic wind speed of I00 mph and 1/2" radial ice with reduced wind speed.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please call 402-289-1888.
Standard Conditions
All engineering services are performed on the basis that the information used is current and correct.
This information may consist of, but is not necessary limited, to:
Information supplied by the client regarding the structure itself, the antenna and feed line
loading on the structure and its components, or other relevant information.
Information from drawings in the possession of Semaan Engineering Solutions, or generated
by field inspections or measurements of the structure.
It is the responsibility of the client to ensure that the information provided to Semaan Engineering
Solutions and used in the performance of our engineering services is correct and complete. In the
absence of information to the contrary, we assume that all structures were constructed in accordance
with the drawings and specifications and are in an un-corroded condition and have not deteriorated;
and we, therefore, assume that their capacity has not significantly changed from the "as new"
condition.
All services will be performed to the codes specified by the client, and we do not imply to meet any
other codes or requirements unless explicitly agreed in writing. If wind and ice loads or other
relevant parameters are to be different from the minimum values recommended by the codes, the
client shall specify the exact requirement. In the absence of information to the contrary, all work
will be performed in accordance with the latest relevant revision of ANSVEIA-222.
All services are performed, results obtained, and recommendations made in accordance with
generally accepted engineering principles and practices. Semaan Engineering Solutions is not
responsible for the conclusions, opinions and recommendations made by others based on the
information we supply.
SEMAAN ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, LLC
1079 North 205th Street
Omaha, Nebraska 68022
Phone: 402-289-1888
Fax: 402-289-1861
100'-0"
Job Information
Code: TINEIA-222 Rev F
Pole: LI13411B
Description:
Client: T-Mobile USA-WA
Location: Mattituck, NY
Shape: 18 Sides
Height: 100.00 (fi)
Base Elev (fi[): 0.00
Taper: 0,149969 (in/ft)
8_0'-0"
_45'-0"
40'-9"
85'-0"
75'-0"
20'-0"
3/16" Thick
(65 KS1)
39'-3"
7/32" Thick
(65 KS~)
100'-0"
45'-0"
1/4" Thick
(65 KSi)
Sections Properties
Diameter (in) Ovedap Steel
Shaft Length Accross Flats Thick Joint Length Taper Grade
Section (ft) Top Bottom (in) Type (in) (in/It) (ksi)
1 45.000 31.44 38.19 0.250 0.000 0.149969 65
2 39.250 26.63 32.51 0.219 Slip Joint 51.000 0.149969 65
3 20.000 26.63 26.63 0.188 BuftJoint 0.000 0.000000 65
Discrete Appurtenance
Attach Force
Elev (ft) Elev (ft) Qty Description
95.000 95.000 3 S20045A1 LNA
95.000 95.000 3 RR65-19-XXDP
94.000 94.000 1 12'X18' Flag
85.000 85.000 3 S20045AI LNA
85.000 85.000 3 RR65-19-XXDP
75.000 75.000 1 Tri-Antenna Mount
75.000 75.000 3 ETW200VS12UB
75.000 75.000 3 800 10504
Linear Appurtenance
Elev (ft) Exposed
From To Description To Wind
0,000 75.000 7/8 Coax No
0,000 85.000 I 5/8" Coax No
0.000 95.000 1 5/8" Coax No
Load Cases
No Ice 100.00 mph Wind with No Ice
Ice 86.60 mph Wind with Ice
Reactions
Moment Shear Axial
Load Case (Kip-fi) (Kips) (Kips)
No Ice 596.56 10.12 10.43
Ice 472.71 7.96 12.90
Load Case: No Ice
Max Stress 50.1% at 0.0ft
90.000
85.000-
80.000-
75.000-
70.000-
65.000-
60~000-
40.000-
25.000-
20.000-
15.000-
10.000-
5.000-
0.000-
2.87 7.87
12.87
17.87 22.87 27.87
Stresses Iksi)
32.87
37.87
42.87 47.87 ~87
Pole: LIt341tB
Location: Matfituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.t49969 (in~t)
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Base Elev: 0.000 (ft)
Shaft Section Prooerties
Slip Bottom
Sect Lenuth Thick Fy Joint Joint Weiuht Dia Elev Area Ix Wit D/t
Num [fi) (in) (ksi} Type Len(in) (lb) (in) (tt) (sqin) (in^4) Ratio Ratio
1 45.000 0.2500 65 0.00 4,200 38.19 0.000 30.10 5474.8 25.52 152.7
2 39.250 0.2188 65 Slip Joint 51.00 2,722 32.51 40.75 22.42 2955.2 24.80 148.6
3 20.000 0.1875 65 Butt Joint 0.00 %071 26.63 80.00 15.74 1390.1 23.63 142.0
Shaft Weight 7,993
Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc
1Y 811112009 9:39:03
Page:
x
Top
Dia Elev Area Ix Wit Dm Taoer
(in) (tt) (sqin) (in^4) Ratio Ratio (in/fi)
31.44 45.00 24.75 3042.1 20.77 125.76 0.14997
26.63 80.00 18,34 1616.0 20.05 121.74 0.14997
26.63 100.0 15.74 1390.1 23.63 142.03 0.00000
Discrete Appurtenance Properties
Attach
Ele. v
(ft) Description Qty
~ No Ice -- Ice Distance
Weight CaAa CaAa Weiqht CaAa CaAa From Face
(lb) (sf) Factor (lb) (sf) Factor (fi)
Vert
Ecc
(ft)
95.00 S20045A1 LNA
95.00 RR65-19-XXDP
94.00 12'X18' Flag
85.00 S20045A1 LNA
85.00 RR66-19-XXDP
75.00 Tri-Antenna Mount
75.00 ETW200VS12UB
75.00 800 10504
Totals
3 9.92 0.000 1.00 16.03 0.000
3 23.00 0.000 'l.O0 52.00 0.000
t 75.00 18.400 1.00 160.00 18.400
3 9.92 0.000 1.00 15.03 0.000
3 23.00 0.000 1.00 52.00 0.000
1 260.00 5.000 1.00 426.00 7.500
3 11.00 0.470 0.69 14.50 0.620
3 17.60 3.351 0.72 36.63 3.872
20 608.32 1127.57
1.00 0.000 0.000
1.00 0.000 0.000
t.00 0.000 0.000
1.00 0.000 0.000
1.00 0.000 0.000
1.00 0.000 0.000
0.69 0.000 0.000
0.72 0.000 0.000
Numberof Loadings: 8
Linear Appurtenance Properties
Elev Elev
From To
(ft) (fi) Descdpfion
0.00 96.00 {9) 1 518" Coax
0.00 85.00 (9) 1 518" Coax
0.00 75.00 (6}7/8 Coax
Total Weight
-- No Ice -- -- Ice
Weight CaAa Weight CaAa Exposed
iib/ftI (sf/ftI Ilblftt Isf/ftI To Wind
9.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 N
9.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 N
3.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 N
1,845.00 (lb) 1,845.00 (lb)
Pole: LI13411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
Base Dia: 38.t9 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in~t)
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Base Elev: 0.000 (fi)
Se,qment Properties (Max Len: 6ft)
Sea Top Flat
Elev Thick Dia Area Ix W/t D/t Py Fb
(ft) Description (in) (in) (in^2) (in^4) Ratio Ratio (ksi) (ksi)
Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc
71Y 8111/2009 9:39:03 AI~
Page: 2
X
Weight
(~b)
0.00 0.2800 38.190 30.104 8,474.8 26.62 152.76 68 51 0.0
8.00 0.2500 37.440 29.509 5,186.6 25.00 149.76 68 82 607.1
10.00 0.2800 36.690 28.914 4,850.9 24.47 146.76 65 52 497.0
15.00 0.2500 36.940 28.319 4.657.6 23.94 143.76 69 82 486.9
20.00 0.2800 36.190 27.724 4,276.3 23.4'1 140.76 65 82 476.8
28.00 0.2500 34.441 27.'129 4,006.9 22.88 137.76 65 62 466.6
30.00 0.2500 33.691 26.634 3,749.0 22.38 134.76 68 82 456.5
35.00 0.2800 32.941 28.939 3,502.4 21.82 131.76 65 62 446.4
40.00 0.2500 32.191 25.344 3,266.9 21.29 128.76 68 52 436.3
40.75 Bot-Section2 0.2500 32.079 25.255 3.232.6 2t.2t 128.31 65 62 64.6
45.00 Top-Section1 0.2188 31.879 21.981 2,783.7 24.29 145.73 68 52 682.7
50.00 0.2188 31.129 21.460 2,590.6 23.68 142.30 65 52 369.6
55.00 0.2188 30.379 20.940 2,406.6 23.08 138.88 65 52 360.7
60.00 0.2188 29.629 20.419 2,23t.5 22.47 135.45 65 52 351.8
65.00 0.2188 28.879 19.899 2,065.1 21.87 132.02 65 52 343.0
70.00 0.2188 28.129 19.378 1,907.2 21.26 128.59 65 52 334.1
75.00 0.2188 27.380 18.857 t.757.6 20.66 125.16 65 52 325.3
80.00 Top-Section2 0.2188 26.630 18.337 1,616.0 20.05 121.74 65 82 316.4
80.00 Bot-Section3 0.1875 26.630 15.736 1,390.1 23.63 t42.03 68 52
85.00 0.1878 26.630 15.736 1,390.1 23.63 142.03 65 52 267.7
90.00 0.1875 26.630 '15.736 1.390.1 23.63 142.03 65 62 267.7
94.00 0.1876 26.630 15.736 1.390.1 23.63 142.03 65 52 214.2
95.00 0.1875 26.630 15.736 1.390.1 23.63 142.03 65 52 53.5
7,992.6
Pole: LI13411B
Location: Matfituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
Load Case: No Ice
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
Shaft Segment Forces
Seg Top
Elev
Iff) Description
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
40.75 Bot- Section 2
45.00 Too- Section 1
50.00
55.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
75.00 ADDertunance(s)
80.00 TOO- Section 2
85.00 Aooertunance(s)
90.00
94.00 Aooertunance(s)
95.00 Aopertunance¢s)
t00.0
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Base Elev: 0.000 (ft)
100.00 mph Wind with No Ice
Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc
811112009 9:39:03 AR
Page: 3
X
21 Itamfions I
Ice Wind Dead Tot Dead
;z c~zGh C Thick Tributary Aa CfAa Force X Load Ice Load
Kz (ps~ (ps~ (mph-ffI Cf un) (fi) (s~ (s~ (lbI (lbI (lb)
0.00 1.00 25.600 43.26 318.240,650 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0,0 0.0 0.0
0.00 1.00 25,600 43.26 312.00 0,680 0.00 5.00 15.786 10.24 443.1 0.0 507.1
0.00 1.00 26.600 43.26 306,76 0.650 0.00 5.00 18.444 10.04 434.3 0.0 497.0
0.00 1.00 25,600 43.26 299.50 0,660 0.00 5.00 15.131 9.84 425.5 0.0 486.9
0.00 1.00 25.600 43.26 293.25 0.650 0.00 6.00 14.819 9.63 416.7 0.0 476.8
0.00 1.00 25.600 43.26 287.00 0.650 0.00 $.00 14.506 9.43 407.9 0.0 466.6
0.00 1.00 25.600 43.26 280.75 0.650 0.00 5.00 14.194 9.23 399.2 0.0 456.8
0.00 1.01 26.034 43.99 276.82 0.650 0.00 9.00 13.882 9.02 397.0 0.0 446.4
0.00 1.05 27.046 45.70 275.73 0.650 0.00 5.00 13.569 8.82 403.1 0.0 436.3
0.00 1.06 27.190 46.95 275.50 0.650 0.00 0.75 2.008 1.31 60.0 0.0 64.6
0.00 1.09 27.972 47.27 273.88 0.650 0.00 4.25 11.403 7.41 350.4 0.0 682.7
0.00 1.12 28.827 48.71 275.27 0.650 0.00 5.00 13.127 8.53 416.7 0.0 369.6
0.00 1.16 29.623 50.06 272.32 0.660 0.00 5.00 12,814 8.33 417.0 0.0 360.7
0.00 1.18 30.368 5t.32 268.92 0.650 0.00 5.00 12.502 8.t3 417.1 0.0 351.8
0.00 1.21 31.071 52.51 265.13 0.650 0.00 5.00 12.189 7.92 416.0 0.0 343.0
0 O0 t.24 31.736 53.63 260.99 O.~fl 0.00 S.O0 11.877 7.72 414.0 O.fl 334.1
0.00 1.26 32.368 54.70 286.55 0.650 0.00 6.00 11.564 7.62 411.2 0.0 326.3
0.00 1.28 32.970 55.71 251.84 0.660 0.00 5.00 11.252 7.31 407.5 0.0 316.4
0.00 1.31 33.546 56.69 284.03 0.650 0.00 9.00 11.096 7.21 408.9 0.0 267.7
0.00 1.33 34.098 57.62 256.tl 0.650 0.00 9.00 11.096 7.21 415.6 0.0 267.7
0.00 1.34 34.525 68.34 257.71 0.650 0.00 4.00 8.877 6.77 336.6 0.0 214.2
0.00 1.35 34.629 58.92 258.10 0.650 0.00 1.00 2.219 1.44 84.4 0.0 83.6
0.00 1.37 35.140 59.38 259.99 0.650 0.00 5.00 11.096 7.21 428.3 0.0 267.7
Totals: 100.00 8,309.6 0.0 7,992.6
Pole: LI1341tB
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: tSSides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
Base Elev:
Code: TIAJEIA-222 Rev F
0.000 (fi)
ILoad Case: Nolce
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
Discrete Appurtenance Se.qment Forces
Elev qz qzOh
(fi) Description Qty (psf) (psf)
100.00 mph Wind with No Ice
Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc
8/1112009 9:39:03 AI~
Page: 4
X
21 Iterations
Total Horiz Vert Wind Mom Mom Dead
CaAa [;aAa ECC ECC FX Y Z Loacl
Factor (sf) (fi) (fi) (lb) (Ib-ft) (lb-fi) (lb)
75.00 Tri-Antenna Mount 1 32.368 54.701
75.00 E'r~v200VSI2UB 3 32.368 54.70t
75.00 800 10504 3 32.368 54.701
85.00 S20045A1 LNA 3 33.546 56.693
89.00 RR65-19-XXDP 3 33.546 56.693
94.00 12'X18'Fla(I I 34.525 58.347
95.00 S20045A1 LNA 3 34,629 58.923
95.00 RR65-19-XXDP 3 34.629 58.523
1.00 5.00 0.000 0.000 273.81 0.00 0.00 250.00
0.69 0.97 0.000 0.000 53.22 0.00 0.00 33.00
0.72 7,24 0.000 0.000 395.94 0.00 0,00 52.80
1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,76
1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.00
1.00 18.40 0.000 0.000 1.073.$7 0.00 0,00 75,00
1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.76
1.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0,00 69,00
1,796.23 608.32
Pole: LI13411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: t8 Sides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
ILoad Case: Nolce
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
Applied Seflment Forces Summar~
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Base Elev: 0.000 (fi)
100.00 mph Wind with No Ice
Seg Lateral Axial
Elev FX (3 FY (-)
(fi) llbl ~lb~
0.00 0.00 0.00
$.00 443.09 612.13
10.00 434.30 602.00
15.00 425.52 591.88
20.00 416.73 581.76
25.00 407.94 571.64
30.00 399,16 561.51
35.00 396.99 551.39
40,00 403.16 541.27
40,75 59.99 80.32
45.00 350.39 771.91
50,00 415.67 474.06
55.00 416.98 465.70
60.00 417.05 456.84
66.00 4t6.04 447.98
70.00 414.09 439.13
75.00 1,133.84 766.07
80.00 407.62 406.41
85~00 408.88 456.49
90.00 418.61 312.73
94,00 1,410.22 325.18
90.00 84.42 161.31
100.0 428.32 267.73
Totals: 10,105.86 10,440.92
Tomion Moment
MY MZ
Iib-Et {Ib-fft
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc
8111/2009 9:39:03 AI~
Page: 5
X
21 Iterations
Pole: LI13411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
Base Dia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Base Elev: 0.000 (ft)
ILoad Case: Nolce
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
Calculated Shaft Forces and Deflections
100.00 mph Wind with No Ice
Copyright Semaan Engineerfng Solutions, Inc
7~Y 811112009 9:39:03 Alt
Page: 6
X
21 Iterations
Seg Lateral Axial Lateral Moment Tomion Moment X Z Total
Elev FX (-) FY(~ FZ MX MY MZ Deflect Deflect Deflect Rotation
(fl) (kips} (kips) (kips1 Iff.kips) (fi.kipst Ifl.kipst (in) (in) (in) (deg)
0.00 -10.120 -10.432 0.000 0.000 0.000 -596.662 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
5.00 -9.701 -9.796 0.000 0.000 0.000 -545.965 -0.080 0.000 0.080 -0.148
10.00 -9.287 -9.173 0.000 0.000 0.000 -497.462 -0.314 0.000 0.314 -0.292
15.00 -8.878 -8.663 0.000 0.000 0.000 -451.029 -0.695 0.000 0.695 -0.431
20.00 -8.474 -7.965 0.000 0.000 0.000 -406.640 -1.219 0.000 1.219 -0.568
25.00 -8.076 -7.380 0,000 0.000 0.000 -364.269 -1.881 0.000 1,881 -0.693
30.00 -7.684 -6.808 0.000 0,000 0.000 -323.888 -2,674 0.000 2.674 -0.816
35.00 -7.291 -6.249 0.000 0.000 0.000 -286,469 -3.591 0.000 3,591 -0.931
40.00 -6.884 -6.707 0.000 0,000 0.000 -249.016 -4.625 0.000 4.625 -1.040
40.78 -6.828 -5.622 0.000 0.000 0.000 -243.852 -4.790 0,000 4.790 -1.056
45.00 -6,470 -4.847 0.000 0.000 0.000 -214.833 -5.770 0.000 5.770 -1.142
50.00 -6.052 -4.371 0.000 0.000 0.000 -182.481 -7.016 0.000 7.016 -1.235
55.00 -5,631 -3.906 0.000 0.000 0.000 -152.221 -8.360 0.000 8.360 -1.326
60.00 -5.207 -3,463 0.000 0.000 0.000 -124.068 -9.794 0.000 9.794 -1.408
70.00 -4.361 -2.678 0.000 0.000 0.000 -74.112 -12.890 0.000 12.890 -1.538
75.00 -3.208 -1.841 0.000 0.000 0.000 -62.309 -14.527 0.000 14.527 -1.585
80.00 -2.790 -1.444 0.000 0.000 0.000 -36.271 -16.208 0.000 16.208 -1.621
85.00 -2.368 -0.999 0.000 0.000 0.000 -22.322 -17.921 0,000 17.921 -1.647
90.00 -1,944 -0.698 0.000 0.000 0.000 -10.481 -19.666 0.000 19.656 -1.664
94.00 -0.525 -0.414 0.000 0.000 0.000 -2.705 -21.052 0.000 21.052 -1.669
95.00 -0.436 -0.255 0.000 0.000 0.000 -2.t80 -21.402 0.000 21.402 -t.670
100.0 -0,428 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000 -23.151 0.000 23.151 -1.671
Pole: LII3411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Base Elev: 0.000 (fi)
Copyright Semaan Engmeedng Solutions, Inc
811112009 9:39:03
Page: 7
X
Load Case: No Ice
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
Calculated Stresses
100.00 mph Wind with No Ice
21 iterations
Seg
Elev Axial(Y) Shear (X) Shear(Z)
(ft) (ksi) (ksi) ~ksi~
Applied Stresses
Tomion Bending (X) Bending(Z)
(ksi) fksi) (ksi)
0.00 0.35 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.35
5.00 0.33 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.15
10.00 0.32 0,65 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.92
15.00 0.30 0.63 0.00 0.00 0,00 21.67
20.00 0.29 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.39
25.00 0.27 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.08
30.00 0.26 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.73
35.00 0.24 0.57 0.00 0.00 0,00 16.36
40.00 0.23 0.55 0.00 0.00 0,00 14.98
40.75 0.22 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.74
45.00 0.22 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.99
50.00 0.20 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.36
55.00 0.19 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.71
60.00 0.17 0.51 0.00 0,00 0.00 10.04
65.00 0.16 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.35
70.00 0.13 0~46 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.66
75.00 0.10 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.96
80.00 0.08 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.64
80.00 0.09 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.23
85.00 0.06 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.61
90.00 0.04 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.22
94.00 0.03 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32
96.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25
100.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Allowable
Combined Stress (Fb) Stress
(ksi) (ksi) Ratio
28.73 51.4 0.0 0.501
24.51 51.8 0.0 0.473
23.27 52.0 0.0 0.448
22.00 52.0 0.0 0.423
20.70 52.0 0.0 0.398
19.38 52.0 0.0 0.373
18.02 52.0 0.0 0.347
16.63 52.0 0.0 0.320
15.20 52.0 0.0 0.293
16.00 52.0 0.0 0.289
15,24 52.0 0.0 0.293
13.60 52.0 0.0 0.262
11.93 52.0 0,0 0.230
10.24 52.0 0.0 0.197
8.54 52.0 0.0 0.164
6.84 52.0 0.0 0.132
5.10 82.0 0.0 0.098
3.76 52,0 0.0 0,072
4.37 52.0 0.0 0.084
2.72 52.0 0.0 0.052
1,34 52.0 0,0 0.026
0.36 52.0 0.0 0.007
0.29 52.0 0.0 0.006
0.10 52.0 0.0 0.002
Pole: LI13411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18Sides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
ILoad Case: Ice
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Base Elev: 0.000 (ft)
86.60 mph Wind with Ice
Shaft Se,cjment Forces
Seg Top
Elev QZ
Ifil Description Kz ipsf~
0.00 0.00 t.00 19.199
6.00 0,00 1.00 19.199
10.00 0.00 1.00 19.199
16.00 0.00 1.00 19,199
20.00 0.00 1.00 19.199
25.00 0.00 1.00 19.199
30.00 0.00 1.00 19.199
35.00 0.00 1.01 19.524
40.00 0.00 1.05 20.284
40.75 Bot - Section 2 0.00 1.06 20.392
45.00 ToP- Section 1 0.00 1.09 20.978
50.00 0.00 1.1221.619
65.00 0.00 1.15 22.216
60.00 0.00 t.18 22.775
66.00 0.00 1.21 23.302
70.00 0.{~0 1.24 23.600
75.00 Ai);)ertunance{s} 0.00 1.26 24.274
80.00 ToD-Section 2 0.00 1.28 24.726
85.00 Apl~ertunance{s) 0.00 1.31 26,158
90.00 0.00 1.33 25.672
94.00 Al~l~ertunance(s) 0.00 1.34 25.892
95.00 Al~oertunance(s) 0.00 1.36 25.970
100.0 0.00 1.37 26.354
Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc
8/1112009 9:39:03 AI~
Page: 8
X
20 Iterations
Ice Wind Dead Tot Dead
qzGh C Thick Tributary Aa CfAa Force X Load Ice Load
(psq (mph-fl) Cf unJ (fi) (sf~ Isf) (lbI llbl (lb)
32.44 276.60 0.650 0.60 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0
32.44 270.19 0.650 0.50 5.00 16.173 10.61 341.1 117.1 624.2
32.44 264.78 0.650 0.50 5.00 15.860 10.31 334.5 114.8 611.8
32.44 289.36 0.650 0.50 5.00 15.548 10.11 327.9 112.4 599.3
32.44 253.95 0.650 0.50 8.00 16.236 9.90 321.3 110.1 586.9
32.44 248.54 0.650 0.50 5.00 14.923 9.70 314.7 107.8 574.5
32.44 243.13 0.650 0.80 8.00 14.611 9.80 308.1 105.5 662.0
32.99 239.73 0.650 0.50 5.00 14.298 9.29 306.7 103.2 549.6
34.27 238.78 0.680 0.50 5.00 13.986 9.09 311.6 100.9 537.1
34.46 238.68 0.650 0.60 0.76 2.07t t.36 46.4 15.1 79.6
35.45 237.18 0.680 0.80 4.26 11.757 7.64 270.9 84.9 767.6
36.53 238.38 0.650 0.50 5.00 t3.543 8,80 321.6 97.6 467.2
37.54 236.83 0.650 0.50 5.00 13.231 8.60 322.9 95.3 486.0
38.49 232.88 0.650 0.60 8.00 12.918 8.40 323.2 93.0 444.8
39.38 229.60 0.650 0.50 5.00 12.606 8.19 322.7 90.7 433.6
4N.22 226.02 O.Ei~;O 0.5N 5.00 12.293 7.99 321.4 R~.3 422.~;
41.02 222.17 0.650 0.50 6.00 11.981 7.79 319.5 86.0 411.3
41.78 218.09 0.650 0.50 5.00 11.669 7.58 316.9 83.7 400.t
42.51 219.99 0.650 0.60 6.00 11.512 7.48 318.2 83.7 351.4
43.21 221.79 0.650 0.50 5.00 11.512 7.48 323.4 83.7 381.4
43.75 223.17 0.650 0.60 4.00 9.210 5.99 262.0 67.0 281.2
43.89 223.51 0.650 0.50 fl.00 2.302 1.50 65.7 16.7 70.3
44.53 226.15 0.650 0.50 5.00 11.512 7.48 333.3 83.7 351.4
Totals: 100.00 6.434.0 1,941.2 9,933.8
Pole: /113411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
rLoad Case: Ice
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
Discrete Appurtenance Se,qment Forces
Base Elev:
86.60 mph Wind with Ice
Elev qz qzGh CaAa
(ft) Description Qty (psf) (psf) Factor
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
o.ooo (~)
Total Horiz
CaAa ECC
(sf} (ft)
Copydght Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc
8/1112009 9:39:03 AR
Page: 9
X
20 iterations
V®rt Wind Mom Mom Dead
Ecc FX Y Z Load
(fi) (lb) Ob-fi) (lb-fi) (lb)
75.00 Tri-Antenna Mount 1 24.274 41.023 1.00 7.60 0.000
75.00 ETW200VS12UB 3 24,274 41,023 0.69 1.28 0.000
75,00 800 10504 3 24.274 41.023 0.72 8.36 0.000
85.00 S20045A1 LNA 3 25.158 42.517 1.00 0.00 0.000
85.00 RR65-19-XXDP 3 25.158 42.517 1.00 0,00 0.000
94.00 12'Xt8' Flaq 1 25.892 43.757 1.00 18.40 0.000
95.00 S20045A1 LNA 3 26.970 43,890 1.00 0.00 0.000
95.00 RR65-19-XXDP 3 25.970 43.890 1.00 0.00 0,000
0.000 307.68 0.00 0.00 425.00
0.000 52.69 0.00 0.00 43.60
0,000 343.10 0.00 0.00 106.89
0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.09
0,000 0.00 0.00 0,00 156.00
0.000 805.13 0.00 0.00 150,00
0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.09
0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 156.00
1,508.55 1,127.57
Pole: LIt34'I1B
Location: Matt/tuck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
BaseDia: 36.t9 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/ft)
Base Elev:
Load Case: Ice
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
86.60 mph Wind with Ice
Applied Seoment Forces Summary
Seg
Elev
(fi)
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
o.ooo
Lateral Axial Torsion Moment
FX (-) FY (-) MY MZ
{lb) (lb) (lb-fi) (lb-fiI
Copyright Sernaan Engineering Solutions, Irc
Y 8/1112009 9:39:03 AI~
Page: 10
X
20 Iterations
0.00
6.00
10.00
t6.00
20.00
26.00
30.00
36.00
40.00
40.75
46.00
50.00
55.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
76.00
80.00
85.00
90.00
94.00
95.00
100.0
Totals:
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
341.08 729.20 0.00 0.00
334.50 716.76 0.00 0.00
327.91 704.33 0.00 0.00
321.32 691.89 0.00 0.00
314.73 679,45 0.00 0.00
308.14 667.02 0.00 0.00
306.66 654.68 0.00 0.00
311.63 642.14 0.00 0.00
46.39 95.40 0.00 0.00
270.94 856.84 0,00 0.00
321,63 572.16 0.00 0.00
322.88 560.98 0.00 0.00
323.19 549.81 0.00 0.00
322.67 538.64 0.00 0.00
321.41 627.47 0.00 0.00
1,022.90 1,091.69 0.00 0.00
316.94 490.12 0.00 0,00
318.16 642.53 0.00 0.00
323.40 396.44 0.00 0,00
1,067.08 467.16 0.00 0.00
65.69 280,38 0.00 0.00
333.28 351.44 0.00 0.00
7,942.51 12,906.42 0.00 0.00
Pole: LI13411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
Base Dia: 36.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in~t)
Base Elev:
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
o.ooo (ft)
I Load Case: Ice 86.60 mph Wind with Ice
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: 1.00
Calculated Shaft Forces and Deflections
Seg Lateral Axial Lateral Moment Torsion Moment
Elev FX (-) FY (-) FZ MX MY MZ
{ft) (kips) {kips} ~kipsI (fi-kips) (ft-kips) (fi-kips)
0.00 -7.955 -12.898 0,000 0.000 0.000 -472.713
5.00 -7.638 -12.154 0.000 0.000 0.000 -432.937
10.00 -7.324 -11.424 0,000 0.000 0.000 -394.747
15.00 -7.013 -10.708 0.000 0.000 0.000 -358.129
20.00 -6.705 -10.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 -323.066
25.00 -6.400 -9.318 0.000 0.000 0.000 -289.543
30.00 -6.099 -8.644 0.000 0.000 0.000 -257.542
35.00 -6.797 -7.986 0.000 0.000 0.000 -227.046
40,00 -5.483 -7.342 0.000 0.000 0.000 -t98.060
40.76 -5.441 -7.243 0.000 0.000 0.000 -193.947
45.00 -5.165 -6.384 0.000 0.000 0.000 -170.825
50.00 -4.84t -5.811 0.000 0.000 0.000 -145.003
55.00 -4.515 -5.251 0.000 0.000 0.000 -120.798
60.00 -4.t86 -4.703 0.000 0.000 0.000 -98.226
66.00 -3.0~6 -4.167 O.OOO 0.000 O.OOO -77.296
70.00 -3.527 -3.644 0.000 0.000 0.000 -68.0t4
75.00 -2.482 -2.574 0.000 0.000 0.000 -40.381
80.00 -2.155 -2.090 0.000 0.000 0.000 -27.972
85.00 -1.823 -1.454 0.000 0.000 0.000 -17.197
90.00 -1.491 -1.068 0.000 0.000 0.000 -8.082
94.00 -0.413 -0.622 0.000 0.000 0.000 -2.119
95.00 -0.341 -0.344 0.000 0.000 0.000 -1.706
100.0 -0.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Copyright Semaan Eng~eering Solutions, /nc
Z/,/Y 811112009 9:39:03
Page: 11
X
20 Iterations
X Z Total
Deflect Deflect Deflect Rotation
(in) (in) (in) (deg)
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
-0.064 0.000 0.064 -0.118
-0.249 0.000 0.249 -0.232
-0.581 0.000 0,851 -0.342
-0.967 0.000 0.967 -0.449
-1.492 0.000 1.492 -0.560
-2.121 0,000 2,121 -0.648
-2.849 0.000 2.849 -0.739
-3.67t 0.000 3.671 -0.826
-3.802 0.000 3.802 -0.839
-4.580 0.000 4.680 -0.907
-8.570 0.000 5.570 -0.981
-6.637 0.000 6.637 -1.054
-7.777 0.000 7.777 -1.118
-8.979 0.000 8.979 -t.t74
-10.236 0.000 10.235 -1.221
-11.534 0.000 11.534 -1.258
-12.867 0.000 12.867 -1.286
-14.225 0.000 14.226 -1.305
-16.699 0.000 15.599 -1.318
-16.706 0.000 16.706 -1.322
-16.983 0.000 16.983 -1.323
-18.369 0.000 18.369 -1.324
Pole: LI13411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Height: 100.0 (ft)
Shape: 18 Sides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
Top Dia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
Base Elev:
Code: TIAJEIA-222 Rev F
ILoad Case: Ice
Gust Response Factor: 1.69
Dead Load Factor: 1.00
Wind Load Factor: t.00
Calculated Stresses
86.60 mph Wind with Ice
Seg
Elev Axial (Y)
(ft) (ksi)
0.00 0.43
5.00 0.41
10.00 0.40
15.00 0.38
20.00 0.36
25.00 0.34
30.00 0.33
35.00 0.31
40.00 0.29
40.75 0.29
45.00 0.29
60.00 0.27
56.00 0.25
60.00 0.23
66.00 0.21
70.00 0.19
76.00 0.14
80.00 0.11
80.00 0.13
85.00 0,09
90.00 0.07
94.00 0.04
95.00 0.02
100.00 0.00
Applied Stresses
Shear (X) Shear(Z) Tomion
(ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
0.53 0.00 0.00
0.62 0.00 0.00
0.51 0.00 0.00
0.60 0.00 0.00
0.49 0.00 0.00
0.48 0.00 0.00
0,46 0.00 0.00
0.46 0.00 0.00
0.44 0.00 0.00
0.43 0.00 0.00
0.47 0.00 0.00
0.45 0.00 0.00
0.43 0.00 0.00
0.41 0.00 0.00
0.39 0.00 0.00
0.37 0.00 0.00
0.27 0.00 0.00
0.24 0.00 0.00
0.28 0.00 0.00
0.23 0.00 0.00
0.19 0.00 0.00
0.05 0.00 0.00
0.04 0.00 0.00
0.04 0.00 0.00
o.ooo (ft)
Copydght Semaan Engineering Solutions, hlc
8/1112009 9:39:03 AI~
Page: 12
X
20 Iterations
Bending (X) Bending (Z)
{ksit {ksi)
0.00 20.09
0.00 19.'15
0.00 18.19
0.00 17.21
0.00 16.20
0,00 15.16
0.00 14.10
0.00 13.01
0.00 11.89
0.00 tt.73
0.00 11.92
0.00 10.62
0.00 6,29
0.00 7.95
0.00 6.69
0.00 5.21
0.00 3.83
0,00 2.8'1
0.00 3.26
0.00 2.0'1
0.00 0.94
0.00 0.26
0.00 0.20
0.00 0.00
Allowable
Combined Stress (Fb) Stress
(ksi) (ksi) Ratio
20.54 81.4 0.0 0.400
19.58 51.8 0.0 0.378
18.61 52.0 0.0 0.368
17.61 52.0 0.0 0.339
16.58 52.0 0.0 0.319
15.53 62.0 0.0 0.299
14.45 52,0 0.0 0.278
13.34 62.0 0.0 0.257
12.20 52,0 0.0 0.235
12.04 52.0 0.0 0.232
12.24 52.0 0.0 0.235
10.91 52.0 0.0 0.210
9.57 52.0 0,0 0.184
8.21 52.0 0.0 0.158
6.83 52,0 0.0 0.131
5.44 52.0 0.0 0.105
4.00 52.0 0.0 0.077
2.95 62.0 0.0 0.057
3.43 52.0 0.0 0.066
2.14 62.0 0.0 0.041
t.06 62.0 0.0 0.020
0.30 52.0 0.0 0.006
0.23 62.0 0.0 0.004
0.07 52.0 0.0 0.00'1
Pole: LII3411B
Location: Mattituck, NY
Hei~lht: 100.0 (fi)
Shape: 18 Sides
BaseDia: 38.19 (in)
TopDia: 26.63 (in)
Taper: 0.149969 (in/fi)
Analysis Summary
Code: TIA/EIA-222 Rev F
Base Elev: 0.000 (fi)
Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc
811112009 9:39:03 AI~
Page: 13
X
Load Case
Reactions
Shear Shear Axial Moment Moment Moment
FX FZ FY MX MY MZ
(kips) (kips) (kips) (fi-kips) (fi-kips) (fi-kips)
Max Stresses
Combined Allowable
Stress Stress Elev Stress
(ksi) (ksi) (fi) Ratio
No Ice 10.1 0.00 10.43 0.00 0.00 596.56 26.73 51.4 0.00 0.501
Ice 8.0 0.00 12.90 0.00 0.00 472.71 20.54 51.4 0.00 0.400
Pinnacle Telecom Group
Consulting and Engineering Services
Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance
Assessment and Report
MetroPCS
Site NY7312
12585 Sound Avenue
MatTiTuck, NY
OcTober 14, 2009
14 Ridgedale Avenue - Suite 209 · Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927 · 973-451-1630
CONTENTS
Introduction and Summary
Antenna and Transmission Data
Mathematical Compliance Analysis
Compliance Conclusion
Certification
3
5
6
11
12
Appendix A. Background on the FCC MPE Limit
Appendix B. Summary of Expert Qualifications
Introduction and Summary
At the request of MetroPCS, Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an
independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC
compliance for a proposed wireless base station antenna operation to be added
to an existing "flagpole style" monopole located at 12585 Sound Avenue in
Mattituck, NY. MetroPCS refers to the site by the code "NY7312", and proposes
panel antennas arranged for sectorized service coverage using the 2130-2140
MHz frequency band.
The FCC requires ail wireless operators to perform an assessment of the RF
fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna
operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum
Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations.
In this case, the compliance assessment needs to incorporate the RF effects of
an existing cellular antenna operation at the site by T-Mobile. Note that FCC
regulations require any future antenna collocator to specifically assess and
assure continuing FCC compliance based on the overall RF effects of all
proposed and then-existing antennas at the site.
This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE
limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the
antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula - and the analysis is
designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the
antennas. In that way, though, as long as the results indicate RF levels below
the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is
satisfied.
The results of a compliance assessment such as this can be described in
layman's terms by expressing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of
the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated
RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded and there
is a need to mitigate the potential exposure, while calculated RF levels lower
than 100 percent indicate compliance with the limit. We can (and will) also
describe the worst-case result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below-
the-limit" factor.
The result of the FCC compliance assessment in this case is as follows:
[] The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of
proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is 0.6780 percent
(i.e., less than 7/10ths of one percent) of the FCC MPE limit. In other
words, the worst-case calculated RF level is more than 145 times below
the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF
emissions from antennas.
r~ The results of the calculations provide clear demonstration that the RF
levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations
will be in clear compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of
the conservative methodology and assumptions we incorporated in the
analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less
significant than these calculation results indicate.
The remainder of this repod provides the following:
[] relevant technical data on the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation at
the site, as well as on the existing antenna operation;
o a description of the FCC model for assessing MPE compliance, and
application of the relevant technical data to that model; and
r~ analysis of the results, and the compliance conclusion for the antenna
site.
In addition, two Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on
the FCC MPE limit along with a list of key FCC references on compliance.
Appendix B provides a summary of the qualifications of the exper[ certifying FCC
compliance for this site.
Antenna and Transmission Data
The table below summarizes the relevant technical data for the proposed
MetroPCS antenna operation.
Frequency Band 2130 - 2140 MHz
Service Coverage Type Sectorized - with identical transmission and
compliance-related parameters
Antenna Manufacturer & Model Kathrein 800-10504 (or equiv.)
Antenna Maximum Gain 17.8 dBi
Antenna Centerline Height AGL 75 ft.
RF Channels per Sector 7
Transmitter Power / RF Channel 24 watts (max.)
Antenna Line Loss Conservatively ignored (assumed 0 dB)
The antenna vertical-plane emission pattern is used in the calculations of RF
levels at ground level around a site, as it is a key determinant of the relative
amount of RF emissions in the "downward" direction.
Figure 1 on the next page shows the vertical-plane emission pattern of the
antenna model proposed here by MetroPCS. Note that in these types of antenna
emission pattern diagrams, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock
position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is
described using decibel units. Note, too, that the use of a decibel scale to
describe the relative pattern at different angles incidentally serves to significantly
understate the actual focusing effects of the antenna. Where the antenna pattern
reads 20 dB, for example, the relative RF energy emitted at the corresponding
downward angle is 1/100th of the maximum that occurs in the main beam (at 0
degrees); at the 30 dB point, it is 1/1,000th of the maximum.
Figure 1. Kathrein 800-10504 Antenna- Vertical-plane Emission Pattern
0 deg
horizon
5 dB / division
As noted at the outset, there is an existing T-Mobile antenna operation to include
in the compliance assessment. In the analysis for T-Mobile, we will
conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at
maximum transmitter power.
T-Mobile (also known as Omnipoint) is licensed to operate in the 1900 MHz
band, and uses a maximum of eight RF channels in each antenna sector, with a
maximum transmitter power of 20 watts per channel. T-Mobile is also licensed to
operate in the 2100 MHz band, and uses two channels per sector, with a
maximum of 40 watts of transmitter power per channel. The T-Mobile antennas
are stacked at the top of the 100-foot flagpole.
Mathematical Compliance Analysis
FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65")
provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various
points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in
what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly
proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the
downward direction of interest - and the levels are otherwise inversely
proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna.
Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by
reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a
100% "perfect" reflection, the worst*case approach.
The FCC's formula for street-level compliance assessment for any given wireless
antenna operation is as follows:
MPE% = (100 * TxPower * 10 (Gmax-Vdisc/10) * 4 ) / ( MPE * 4= * R2 )
where
MPE%
100 =
TxPower =
MPE =
R =
RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit
applicable to continuous exposure of the general public
factor to convert the raw result to a percentage
maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a
function of the number of channels per sector, the
transmitter power per channel, and line loss
numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the
downward direction of interest; data on the antenna
vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer
specifications
factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy
reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship
between RF field strength and power density (22= 4)
FCC general population MPE limit
straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of
interest, centimeters
The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the
facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended
standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 2 on the next page.
height from
antenna
bottom to
6.5' above
ground
level
antenna
0 ~' 500
Ground Distance D from the site
Figure 2. MPE% Calculation Geometry
It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower
the RF level - which is generally but not universally correct. The results of
MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical-
plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the
antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing
distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance
approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes
less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a
result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well
understood to be in compliance.
FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following
manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made
for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at
each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance
with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as
"total MPE%', and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is,
by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represent non-compliance and a
8
need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100
percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient
demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit.
Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas and sectorized
coverage arrangements are used, the compliance assessments are based on the
RF effect of a single (facing) sector, as the RF effects of directional antennas
facing generally away are insignificant.
The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into
the MPE% calculations on a general basis:
1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum
power and maximum channel capacity - and the power-attenuation
effects referred to as antenna line loss are ignored wherever possible.
2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the
line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored.
3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by
assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom
(rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna,
as applicable.
4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent
enhanced (increased) via a "perfect" field reflection from the ground itself.
The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF
exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur - and the purpose of
this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance.
The table that follows provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each
operator, with the worst-case (maximum) result highlighted in bold in the last
column.
Ground MetroPCS T-Mobile Total
Distance (fi) MPE% MPE% MPE%
0 0.0313 0.0642 0.0955
20 0.0574 0.0096 0.0670
40 0.6481 0.0299 0.6780
60 0.1748 0.0138 0.1886
80 0.1832 0.0602 0.2434
100 0.1033 0.0324 0.1357
120 0.0784 0.0793 0.1577
140 0.0828 0.0549 0.1377
160 0.1489 0.1295 0.2784
180 0.0745 0.0629 0.1374
200 0.0410 0.0371 0.0781
220 0.1015 0.0857 0.1872
240 0.1142 0.1647 0.2789
260 0.1042 0.1375 0.2417
280 0.0793 0.0941 0.1734
300 0.0529 0.0731 0.1260
320 0.0349 0.0844 0.1193
340 0.0310 0.1222 0.1532
360 0.0251 0.1535 0.1786
380 0.0297 0.1384 0.1681
400 0.0269 0.1438 0.1707
420 0.0465 0.1309 0.1774
440 0.0425 0.1008 0.1433
460 0.0390 0.0924 0.1314
480 0.0808 0.0851 0.1659
500 0.0746 0.0572 0.1318
As indicated, the worst-case calculated RF level at street-level is 0.6780 percent
of the FCC MPE limit.
A graph of the calculation results, provided on the following page, probably
provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated
RF levels. The line representing the calculated total MPE% results does not
noticeably rise above the graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear
and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit.
lO
120
100
8O
Q' 60
f~ 40
~ 2O
0
COMPLIANCEASSESSMENT RESULTS
Normalized FCC MPE Limit I~ Total MPE% Results
0 100 200 300 400 500
Distance (ft)
Compliance Conclusion
The FCC MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous
human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE
limit is acceptable and completely safe.
As described, the analysis in this case shows that the conservatively calculated
maximum RF level from the combination of proposed and existing antenna
operations at the site is only 0.6780 percent (i.e., less than 7/10ths of one percent)
of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level from
the combination of proposed and existing antennas at the site is more than 145
times below the federal limit established as safe for continuous human exposure
to the RF emissions from antennas.
The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with
the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation
methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels
actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation
results here indicate.
11
Certification
It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance
assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical
Officer, who certifies as follows:
1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety
and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq).
2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in
this report are true, complete and accurate.
3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the
applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and
industry practice.
4. The results of the analysis indicate that the antenna emissions at the subject
site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RF exposure.
Chief Technical Officer
Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC
10/14/O9
Date
12
Appendix A: Background on the FCC MPE LimiT
FCC Rules and Regulations
As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established
limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields.
The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus
of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters.
Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its
guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical
community - notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its
Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE
limits for both occupational and general population exposure.
The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of
human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific
Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to
accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form
of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or
greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an
additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population
exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of
more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of
both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions - and continuous
exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to
result in no adverse health effects or even health risk.
The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and
assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had
appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they
receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is
assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the
exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment.
The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using
alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and
power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The
table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general
population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio
frequency ranges.
13
Frequency Eange (F)
(M Hz )
Occupational Exposure
( mW/cra2 )
General Public Exposure
( mW/cm2 )
0.3 - 1.34 100 100
1.34 - 3.0 100 180 / F2
3.0 - 30 900 / F2 180 / F2
30 - 300 1.0 0.2
300 - 1,500 F / 300 F / 1500
1,500- 100,000 5.0 1.0
The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's
occupational and general population MPE limits.
Power Density
(mW/cm2)
lO0
5.0
1.0
0.2
Occupational
......... General Public
I I I I I
0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300
Frequency (MHz)
1,500 100,000
Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE
limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by
the systems of interest.
14
The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the
RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the
MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually
expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit.
For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the
MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the
limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is
more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve
compliance.
FCC References
47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section
1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits).
47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 22 (Public Mobile Services).
47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 24 (Personal Communications
Services).
FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests
for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v)
of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidel/nes for
Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket
93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry
Association Conceming Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt
State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting
Facilities, released August 25, 1997.
FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of
Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation,
released December 24, 1996.
FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for
Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released
August 1, 1996.
FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating
Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency
Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997.
FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, "Questions and
Answers About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition
4, August 1999.
15
Appendix B: Summary of Expert Qualifications
Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC
SynopsiS: · 37 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system
engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure
· Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments
on more than 12,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules
went into effect in 1997
· Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more
than 1,200 times since 1997
· Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey,
Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states,
as well as by the FCC
Education: · B.E.E., City College of New York (Sch. Of Eng.), 1971
· M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982
· Bronx High School of Science, 1966
Current Responsibilities: · Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC
compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering,
and consulting on wireless technology and regulation
Prior Experience: · Edwards & Kelcey, VP - RF Engineering and Chief
Information Technology Officer, 1996-99
· Bellcore, Executive Director- Regulation and Public Policy,
1983-96
· AT&T (Corp. HQ), Director - Spectrum Management Policy
and Practice, 1977-83
· AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor- Microwave Radio
System Design, 1972-77
Specific RF Safety/ · Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972
Compliance Experience: · Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and
compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG
· While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models
later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure
· Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless
carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state
and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system
integrators, and other consulting / engineering firms
Other Background: · Author, Microwave System Engineering (AT&T, 1974)
· Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New
Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993)
· National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA) - former
three-term President and Chairman of the Board of
Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice
President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors,
and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991
· Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and
International Who's Who in Information Technology
· Published more than 35 articles in industry magaz nes
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Screening Report
Prepared for:
MetroPCS New York, LLC
5 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, New York 10532
NY7312
12585 Sound Avenue
Mattituck, New York 11952
EBI Project No. 61094730
Site Report Date: October 22, 2009
EBI
CONSUl. TING
CreatinI ¥olue for Your $usiness
EBI
CONSUl. TING
www. ebiconsult ing.com
21 B Street
Burlington, MA 01803
Tel: (781) 273-2500
Fax: (781) 273,3311
October 22, 2009
Mr. John Coleman
MetroPCS New York, LLC
5 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, New York 10532
Subject:
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Screening Report
NY7312
12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York
EBI Project #61094730
Dear Mr. John Coleman:
Attached please find our National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ~creening Report, (the Report) for the proposed
telecommunications installation at the address noted above (the Subject Property). The purpose of this Report is to
evaluate the above-referenced property for environmental and historical concerns specified by the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in 47 CFR 1.1307, and general industry standards.
The Subject Property, known as NY7312, consists of an approximately 4.0-acre parcel that is owned by George L.
Penny, Inc. and occupied by the Penny Lumber Company's lumber yard. As such, the Subject Property is improved in
the central portion with an administrative building and in the western, eastern, and northern portions with lumber and
building materials storage buildings surrounded by paved parking areas. The Subject Property is also improved in the
northern portion with a fenced telecommunications compound, which includes an approximate 100-foot tall stealth
flagpole telecommunications tower,
As the date of this Re,oort, MetroPCS New York, LLC proposes to enclose three new telecommunications antennas
within a proposed radome on the existing tower at a centerline height of approximately 75 feet above ground level
(herein, the Project Site). Additionally, MetroPCS New York, LLC proposes to lease an approximate 10-foot by 16-
foot portion of ground space located on the western portion of the tower compound, upon which
telecommunications equipment is proposed to be placed. Power and telecommunications cables are proposed to be
shallow trenched to the lease area from sources located within the existing compound. Coaxial cables are proposed
to be routed from the lease area to the base of the monopole via a raised cable bridge. Access to the Project Site will
be via the parent parcel's existing paved lanes.
Please ~nd the attached National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Checklist, NEPA Summary Report, and associated
documentation for the above-referenced site. Based upon the results of our assessment, it appears that the proposed
installation will not adversely impact any of the criteria as outlined in 1.1307(a) items (1) through (8) and preparation
of an Environmental Assessment (EA) for these criteria is not required.
The Report was completed according to the terms and conditions authorized by you. There are no intended or
unintended third party beneficiaries to this Report,, unless specifically named. EBI is an independent contractor, not an
employee of either the property owner or the project proponent, and its compensation was not based on the findings
or recommendations made in the Report or on the closing of any business transaction. Note that the findings of this
Report are based on the project specifications provided to EBI and described in this Report, In the event that the
design or location of the installation changes, please contact EBI as additional review and/or consultation may be
required.
ENVIROBUSINESSr INC LOCATIONS IATLANTA. GA i BALTIMORE, MD I BURLINGTONr MA i CHICAGO, IL
CRANSTON, RI I DALLAS TX I DENVER, CO I EXETER, NH I HOUS~ONr TX ] LOS ANGELES, CA I
NEW YORK, NY I PHOENIX AZ PORTI ANDr OR I SAN FRANCISCO, CA [ SEATTLEr WA I YORK, PA
Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this ,~eport, and assist you with this project, Please call us if you have any
questions or if we may be of further assistance.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mr. Chris Murray
Author/Project Scientist
Mr. David Akerblom
Reviewer/Program Manager
Direct# (617) 715-1842
Mr. Steve Davies
Salesperson/Program Director
Appendix A - NEPA Checklist
Appendix B - FCC NEPA Summary Report
Appendix C - Figures, Drawings, and Maps
Appendix D - NPA Checklist and Tower Compliance Documentation
Appendix E - USFWS and NYSDEC Correspondence
ENVIROBUSINESS, INC LOCATIONS j ATLANTA, GA j BALTIMORE, MD J BURLINGTON, MA J CHICAGO, II J
CRANSTON, RI J DALLAS, TX J DENVERrCO J EXETERrNH J HOUSTON, TX J LOS ANGELES, CA J
NEW YORK, NY J PHOENIX, AZ J PORTLANDr OR j SAN FRANCISCOr CA : SEATTLE, WA I YORK, PA
APPENDIX A
NEPA CHECKLIST
£BI
Site type (choose one): Site ID: Site Address:
~EBI ~-IRaw land NY7312 12585 Sound Avenue,
[~Tower cole Mattituck, New York
~ o ,~ s u ~ T ~ ,~ ~; [~Othercolo
[--~Tower Replacement
Check appropriate boxes be/ow
FCC NEPA Consulting Agency to
Category Contact No Adverse Potential Adverse Exempt from NPA Applies
Impact Impact Review
Designated National Park Service,
Wilderness Areas US Forest Service,
Bureau of Land [] [] []
Management (BLM)
Designated Wildlife National Park Service,
Preserves US Forest Service, BLM [] [] []
Threatened or US Fish & Wildlife
Endangered Species Service - Field Office
& Critical Habitats (USF&WS) [] [] []
Historic Places State Historic Collocation
Agreement:
Preservation Officer applies
(SHPO), Tribal Historic [] []
Preservation Officer SHPO consultation [] [] Nationwide
(THPO) completed Agreement
Exclusion applies:
Indian Religious American Indian Tribes, Collocation
Agreement
Sites Bureau of Indian Affairs applies:
Tribal COnSUltation [] [] Nationwide
completed Agreement
Exclusion applies:
Floodplain Federal Emergency
Management Agency [] [] []
(FEMA)
Wetlands & USF&WS NWl Maps
Surface Waterways US Army Corps of [] [] []
Engineers (ACOE)
Signature: , Company: EBI Consultine
Print name: Chris Murray Date: October 14. 2009
[Bi Consulting
APPENDIX B
FCC NEPA SUMMARY REPORT
E/I! Con~ultin~
FCC NEPA Summary Report
~,7 CFR Subpart 1, Chi )ter 1, Sections 1.1301-1.1319)
EBI
Site type (choose one):
[--iRaw land
[~]Tower rolo
r-iOther rolo
[-]Tower Replacement
Site ID:
NY7312
Site Address:
12585 Sound Avenue,
Mattituck, New York
1. Is the antenna structure located in an officially designated wilderness area?
The proposed installation consists of mounting antennas to an existing antenna tower; therefore, this
project is not expected to significantly affect officially designated wilderness areas, and the action is
categorically excluded from environmental processing (47 CFR 1.1306).
2. Is the antenna structure located in an officially designated wildlife preserve?
The proposed installation consists of mounting antennas to an existing antenna tower; therefore, this
project is not expected to significantly affect officially designated wildlife preserves, and the action is
categorically excluded from environmental processing (47 CFR 1.1306).
Will the antenna structure likely affect threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats?
( Ref. 50 CFR Part 402)
Correspondence dated July 2006 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's New York Field Office states
that the "Co-location of new equipment and antennae within an existing structure...where all ground
disturbance occurs within previously disturbed areas and where such activities do not increase the
existing height or require the addition of guy wires" are "not likely to adversely affect Federally-listed
species in New York, nor have any significant impacts on migratory birds or other trust resources."
In addition, in a letter dated May 2009 from the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation - Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources, for communications facilities projects that
involve "new antennas or panels on existing towers, or new communications equipment installed within
existing fenced equipment areas, provided that all new work is confined within existing equipment areas,
no previously undisturbed land is disturbed, and no new access roads or expansions of existing access
roads is involved," the program does "not have any records of rare species or significant natural
communities which will be of concern in relation to the proposed projects." Both agencies specify that
additional consultation is not required as part of the Endangered Species Act. Copies of this
correspondence are included within Appendix E,
It should also be noted that the proposed installation consists of mounting antennas to an existing antenna
tower; therefore, this project is not expected to significantly affect threatened or endangered species or
designated critical habitats, and the action is categorically excluded from environmental processing (47
CFR 1.1306).
Will the antenna structure affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, or obJects significant in American
history, architecture, archeolo~, engineering, or culture that are listed, or potentially eligible for listing in
the National Register of Historic Races (NRHP)? (/~et;. $6 CFR Part 800 re~ulations implementi~ Section
1~6 of the National Historic Preservation Act).
EBI evaluated whether the stipulations contained within Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the
Col/oration of W/re/ess Antennas (Collocation Agreement) allow MetroPCS New York, LLC to construct
the proposed facility without consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The
Collocation Agreement's exclusionary conditions for SHPO consultation apply to this project, because
based on information provided by the client, a "substantial increase" in the size of the tower is not
planned for this project.
Consulting
EBI obtained tower documentation from T-Mobile, the tower facility owner, which indicated that the
tower on which the proponent intends to attach its antennas is in compliance with the Nationwide
Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties and that MetroPC$ New York,
//Cs proposed collocation is in compliance with the Collocation Agreement. See Appendix D of this
t~eportfor a copy of this statement.
Additionally, the SHPO reviewed a proposal to construct the tower upon which the proponent intends to
attach its antennas and concluded that the tower would not adversely affect historic places. The New
York SHPO approval for the tower, dated October 16, 2003 is appended to this /~eport (Appendix D).
In summary, the proposed action at the above-referenced property was determined to meet the
conditions set forth in the Collocation Agreement. Therefore, the collocation is recognized to have
minimal OF no adverse effects on historic properties and review of the collocation under the consultation
process set forth under Subpart B of 36 CFR Part 800 is not required. According to the Collocation
Agreement, the licensee has properly taken into account the effects of their action on historic properties
and has fulfilled its Section 106 compliance responsibilities. As such, the collocation requires no further
environmental processing under Section 1.1307(a)(4) of the FCC Rules.
5. Will the antenna structure alf~ct Indian religious site(s)
The proposed action at the above-referenced property was determined to meet the conditions set forth
in the Stipulations of the Collocation Agreement. Therefore, the installation is recognized to have
minimal or no adverse effects on Indian religious sites, Traditional Cultural Properties, or historic
properties and review of the collocation under the consultation process set forth under Subpart B of 36
CFR Part 800 is not required. According to the Collocation Agreement, the licensee has properly taken
into account the effects of their action on historic properties and has fulfilled its Section 106 compliance
responsibilities. As such, the installation requires no further environmentat processing under Section
1.1307(a) (5) of the FCC Rules.
Will the antenna structure be located in a floodplain? (Ref, Executive Order 11988 and 40 CFR Part 6,
Appendix A)
The proposed installation consists of mounting antennas to an existing antenna tower; therefore, this
project is not expected to significantly affect floodplains, and the action is categorically excluded from
environmental processing (47 CFR 1,1306).
Will construction of the antenna structure involve significant change in surface features (e.g, wetlands,
deforestation, or water diversion)? (~ef:/xecut/ve Order 11990and 40 CF£ Part Il Appendix A)
The proposed installation consists of mounting antennas to an existing antenna tower; therefore, this
project is not expected to significantly affect surface features or wetlands, and the action is categorically
excluded from environmental processing (47 CFR 1.1306).
Is the antenna structure located in a residential neighborhood and required to be equipped with high
intensity white lights?
According to client representatives and site plans, the proposed installation will not include high intensity
white lights and be located in a residential neighborhood.
Will the antenna structure equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 EIRP)
and have antenna located less than 10 meters above the ground?.
An evaluation to determine whether radiofrequency (RF) emissions standards are met was not included as
part of this /?e/~ort. EBI understands that client representatives will evaluate the project to ensure
compliance with applicable RF standards.
Consulting
APPENDIX C
FIGURES, DRAWINGS, AND MAPS
[~/ Consulting
%
%
EBI
%
Legend
~ Proiect Si~e k ~ alt. Buffer at _S0,~00, I000' and 1/2 mite
Souroe: Se{ected data from ESRI, EBI and NWl
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
NY7312/
12585 Sound Avenue
Mattituck, NY 11952
PN: 61094730
Legend
~ Project Site ~, ~ alte Buffer at 250,500, I000' and I/2 mile
USGS 24k Quad: Mattituck Hills, NY 1961 and Mattitack, NY 1961
Source: Selected data from ESRI, EBI and USGS
Figure 2 - USGS Quad Location Map
NY7312/
12585 Sound Avenue
Mattituck, NY 11952
PN: 61094730
N
Date Created: 41t 5/2009
Site Specification Sheet Created By~ fardakani
SpecSheet ID: NY7312.A.1-090415 Version I
MetroPCS iD: NY7312 CandidatelO: NY7312A
Ceil Name: NY7312
Candidate: NY7312A
Address: t 2585 Sound Ave
City: Southold St: U? ZiP: ii952
County: Suffolk
BTS Type: 4.0~ 3 ~cto~ 24~W Outdoor
BTS Location: Outdoor
Latitude
DMS: 40-59-26.7
Decimal: 40.990762
StructureType: F!ag Pole
Antenna Height: 87 ' AGL
Sb-ucture Height: 100 ' AGL
Longitude'
72-32-20.4
-72.539006
Notes:
Prelim 04/14/09. Flag pole and we might need to set azimuths to 30,150,270 due to the falgpole design.
Sector Transmitting
Sector Number
Antenna Model
Number of Antennas
Azimuths*
Antenna Gain (dBi)
Remote Elec Titi
Elec DT (+Down, -Up)
Mechl DT (+Down, -Up)
Remote Elec Tilt Serial
Cable Type
Number of Cables
CableLength
Coax Coter Code
Cable Loss (dBm)
Loss Factor
Mount Type
Number of Mounts
Tower Mounted Amp
Latitude
Longitude
Antenna Height
PN
Bulkhead Power (dbm)
EIRP after Antenna (dBm)
a d b e g
17.8
o I
0
2
0
126
(914) 552-9312
Last Modified Date: 4/15/2009i
metroPCS RF Engineering Approved: []
RF Engineering Contact: Fadd Ardakani
Last Modified By: fardakani
17.8
0
0
2
0
207
17.8
0
z
Date Implemented:
Me~oPCS
GROUPz
New York, LLC
MATTITUO~, NY
' %% PROJECT PI~EGTORY, New Yo~ LLC
I I
T; , , ,t -T. ~ '~i~mm GROUP-
t~ r ~,.~ I _~_~J~ '~' '~'
~ ~ ~ / ~,. ~,~. .,, ~.~ ~. ~ ~ e ~ , ~ ~ ~ New Yo~ ~
/
DESIGN°
GROUPz
ARCHITECTURE
New York~ I.l.C
- ~ ] GROUPz
DESIGN~
GROUP::
ARCHITECTURE
DESIGNo
GROUPz
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
..... ~ .... ~' ...... .~, ~ .......... ~ ~'~ ~ New Yo~ ~C
WIRING METHODS LEGEND ~ ~m, ~
New Yo~ ~C
SPECIAL EMPHASIS, CONCERNS, AND LIMITATIONS SYMBOLS 12595 ~OUND AVENUE
t: - - - ! ' " ..... New Vo~l~____LLC
APPENDIX D
NPA CHECKLIST AND
TOWER COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION
EBI Consul~in9
APPLICABILITY OF NATIONWIDE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR REVIEW OF EFFECTS ON
HISTORIC PROPERTIES (NPA)
EBI
Site type (choose one):
]-'1Raw land
I--]Tower colo
[~]Other colo
[--]Tower Replacement
Site ID:
NY7312
Site Address:
12585 Sound Avenue,
Mattituck, New York
Enhancement of a Tower (Exclusion A)
Yes [] No [] Will the proposed action consist of a collocation as defined by the NPA?
Yes [] No [] Will the proposed action create a "substantial increase" in the size of the tower?
Construction of a Replacement Tower (Exclusion B)
Yes [] No [] Can the proposed replacement tower be considered a "substantial increase" in height,
mass, or size in relation to the existing tower located at the site?
Yes [] No [] Could the proposed replacement tower increase the boundaries of the owned or leased
area surrounding the existing tower by more than thirty feet?
Yes [] No [] Will construction of the proposed replacement tower involve excavation outside of a
thirty-foot radius from the edge of owned or leased area or outside existing access or utility
easements?
Yes [] No [] If the existing tower was constructed after March 16, 2001, has the tower NOT
undergone Section 106 review?
Construction of temporary communications tower or facilit7 (Exclusion C)
Yes [] No [] Will the temporary installation involve excavation of soils?
Yes [] No [] Will the temporary installation be in operation for more than twenty-four months?
Construction of Tower within strip mall, shopping center, or industrial park (Exclusion D)'
Yes [] No [] Will the proposed tower be over 200 feet in height?
Yes [] No [] Will the proposed tower be located in a locally designated industrial park, strip mall, or
shoppir~j center that occupies less than 100,000 square feet?
Yes [] No [] Is the locally designated industrial park, strip mall, or shopping center located within the
boundaries of or within five hundred feet of a historic property?
Construction of a Tower at or near utility transmission corridors (Exclusion E)*
Yes [] No [] Will the proposed tower be located outside of or beyond fifty feet of a right-of-way
designated by Federal, State, local, or Tribal governments as a location for communications
towers or utility transmission and distribution lines?
Yes [] No [] Could the proposed tower be considered a "substantial increase" in height, mass, or site
in relation to existing towers or utility transmission and distribution lines located that the site?
Yes [] No [] Will the proposed tower be located within the boundaries of a historic property?
Construction ora Tower in a SHPO/THPO permitted zone (Exclusion F)
Yes [] No [] Will the construction of the tower occur outside of an area designated by the SHPO
and/or THPO for the construction of communications towers and associated facilities?
EEl Consult/ng
[] Collocation of antennas on tower constructed on or before March 16, 2001 (Stipulation IliA)
Yes [] No [] Will the collocation result in a substantial increase in the size of the tower?
Yes [] No [] Has the FCC determined that the tower has, or potentially has, an "adverse effect" on
historic properties?
Yes [] No [] Is the tower pending environmental review before the FCC involving compliance w/Sec.
106?
Yes [] No [] Has the licensee or tower owner received notification of complaint from the public,
SHPO, or Council that the collocation will have an adverse effect on historic properties?
[] Collocation of antennas on tower constructed after March 16, 2001 (Stipulation IVA)
Yes [] No [] Has the tower NOT undergone Section 106 review?
Yes [] No [] Will the collocation result Jn a substantial increase in the size of the tower?
Yes [] No [] Has the FCC determined that the tower has or will have, or potentially has or will have,
an "adverse effect" on historic properties?
Yes [] No [] Has the licensee or tower owner received notification of complaint from the public,
SHPO, or Council that the collocation will have an adverse effect on historic properties?
[] Collocation of antennas on buildings/non-tower structures (Stipulation VA)
Yes [] No [] Is the building/structure over 45 years old?
Yes [] No [] Is the building/structure located within a historic district, or located within 250 feet of
and visible from the ground level of a historic district?
Yes [] No [] Is the building/structure a National Historic Landmark, or listed or eligible for tisting on
the National Register of Historic Places?
Yes [] No [] Has the licensee received notification of complaint from the public, SHPO, or Council
that the collocation will have an adverse effect on historic properties?
[] If al~ questions were answered "Yes" r if Ex I ' : The proposed telecommunications
installation does not meet the criteria and stipulations set forth in the NPA. Therefore, consultation with the
aPplicable SHPO is recruited in accordance with 47 CFR Part 1.1301-1.1319 of the Federal Communications
Commission regulations. In addition, consultation with any Indian Tribe or NHO that attaches significance to the
site or area must be completed.
[] If all questions were answered "No": The telecommunications installation meets the criteria and stipulations
set forth in the NPA. Therefore the telecommunications installation is recognized to have minimal or no adverse
effect on historic properties, and review of the project by the applicable SHPO is not required.
*However, for projects meeting Exclusions D or E, consultation with any Indian Tribe or NHO that attaches
significance to the site OF area must be completed.
MetroPCS New York. LLC Mr. John Christensen 201-966-6061 Auaust 19. 2009
FCC Licensee Contact Phone number Date contacted
T-Mobile Ms. Linda Rizzi 973-292-8796 October 13. 2009
Tower owner Contact Phone number Date contacted
Consult~rig
· ..Mobile.'
4 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, NJ 07054
Sep~en~oer 25, 2oo~
Christopher Mu~ay
New York LLC
D~tee
H~, NY 10532
Pm~ eo-leea~n of telecommu~cation8 efl~
T-M~4~ ~ ID: UI3411B I Melro~::S New York LLC Site ID: NY 7312
Loca~d at: 12585 ~xa3d At, e., Ma~ck, NY 11952
Latitude: 40' ~9' 26.g0" Lor~itude: 72' 3Z 20.00"
T-Mob~h, ea ~ LLC
~e: tO-IZ'O~
Title:
[a co~y of this document shall have the same effect as an original]
New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau
Peebles island, PO Box 189, Watedord, New York 12188-0189
October 16, 2003
518-237-8643
Angela Bailey
DMS Consulting Services, Inc
560 Hudson Street, Suite 3, 1~ Floor
Hackensack, New Jersey 07601
Re:
FCC
100' Monopole & Equipment]125855 Sound
Ave/Matfituck
Southold, Suffolk County
03PR00788
Dear Ms. Bailey:
Thank you for requestigg the comments of the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO). We have reviewed the project in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966.
Based upon this review, it is the SHPO's opinion that your project will have No Effect
upon cultural resources in or eligible for inclusion in the National Registers of Historic Places.
If further correspondence is. required regarding this project, please be sure to refer to the
OPRI-IP Project Rpview (PR) numb& noted above.
Sincerely,
Ruth L. Pierpont
Director
RLP:cmp
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency
RECEIVED
LI'I3 -~/!1
DMS CONSULTING
APPENDIX E
USFWS AND NYSDEC CORRESPONDENCE
Consulting
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources
New York Natural Heritage Program
625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-4757
Phone: (518)402-8935 · FAX: (518)402-9027
Website: www.dec.state.ny.us
May, 2009
Guidelines for Consultation with NY Natural Heritage
regarding
Proposed Collocations of Telecommunication Facilities
on Existing Towers and Buildings
Regarding reviews of the databases of the New York Natural Heritage Program for rare,
endangered, or threatened species in the vicinity of proposed telecommunication equipment to be
collocated on existing telecommunications towers and on existing buildings: New York Natural
Heritage has no records of rare or listed species which would be of concern, and therefore does
not require a consultation with NY Natural Heritage, for any communication facilities projects
that meet one of three criteria below:
1) New antennae or panels on existing towers, or new communications equipment
installed within existing fenced equipment areas, provided that all new work is confined within
existing equipment areas, no previously undisturbed land is disturbed, and no new access roads
or expansion of existing access roads is involved.
2) New or existing towers, antennae, and associated equipment installed at a location
currently wholly occupied by lawn, pavement and/or gravel.
3) New or existing towers, antennae, and associated equipment installed on or in existing
buildings, rooftops, billboards, or bridges, with the exception of the buildings and bridges with
peregrine falcon nests listed later in this letter.
For projects which meet the above criteria, we do not have any records of rare species or
significant natural communities which will be of concern in relation to the proposed projects.
Therefore, in these cases, separate consultation with the New York Natural Heritage Program is
not necessary for a project sponsor to complete the environmental assessment required by the
FCC; this letter may serve as a finding of no known impacts on state-listed species or on other
rare species. This determination may be reconsidered at any time should additional information
on communication facility projects or on rare species become available. Please note that neither
this office, nor the NYS DEC Endangered Species Unit, need to be consulted in the future
regarding communication facilities and equipment collocated on existing towers in New York
State, nor for those located on buildings and bridges except for those listed below.
The NYS DEC Endangered Species Unit offers this guidance regarding cellular
communication facilities atop buildings in urban areas: There is not a concern with regards to
peregrine falcons when new antennas or communications towers and associated equipment are
proposed, or existing ones modified, unless they are actually on the same building or bridge that
a nest is located on. Projects located in adjacent areas will not have a significant impact on this
species. If the projects are proposed for construction on the same building or bridge as a nest or
breeding pair, then please contact the Endangered Species Unit for further consultation at 625
Broadway, Albany, NY, 12233-4754..
For your reference, peregrine falcon nests currently occur on the following buildings and
bridges in the following major urban areas:
New York City buildings:
Comell Medical College, 68t~ Street and York Avenue
Wall Street: 48 Wall Street at Nassau Ave., and at 55 Water Street
Riverside Church, Riverside Drive and 120th
Met Life Building, 200 Park Avenue
Candler Building, W 42nd and Fashion Avenue (near Times Square)
New York Cit~ bridges:
Verrazano Narrows, Throgs Neck, Hell Gate, Triborough, Outerbridge Crossing,
Marine Parkway, Goethals, George Washington, Bayonne, Brooklyn, Broadway,
Williamsburg, Park Avenue Railroad Bridge
Town of Hempstead, Nassau County: Nassau County Medical Center in East
Meadow
Town of Islip, Suffolk County: Captree Island Bridge
Buffalo: Statler Building (Franklin and West Genessee Streets) and City Hall
(Niagara Square)
Rochester: Marine Midland Plaza Building (Court and Chestnut Streets) and
Eastman Kodak Building (State Street near Plymouth and Platt)
Syracuse: State Tower Building (South Warren Street)
Binehamton: Exchange Street
Albany: Dunn Memorial Bridge
Troy: Collar City (Route 7) Bridge
Hudson River Bridges: Tappan Zee, Newburgh-Beacon, Kingston-Rhinecliff,
Mid-Hudson, Rip van Winkle, Castleton-on-Hudson, and Bear Mountain
Oedensbure: Ogdensburg Bridge
Grand Island/Niaeara Falls: North Grand Island Bridge (I-190 over Niagara
River)
For proposed telecommunications facilities which do not meet the above criteria,
including those projects involving the construction of new towers, please submit a request to the
New York Natural Heritage Program for a review of any rare or listed species in the vicinity of
the proposed project. Directions for submitting a request can be found at
http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/31181.html, or can be provided by NY Natural Heritage.
If you have any questions regarding these determinations, please contact our office.
Communication Tower Consultation in New York
Existing Communication Towers
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) New York Field Office recognizes that individual
project review by the Service is not required under certain conditions. The Service provides the
following comments in accordance with provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA) (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1940
(MBTA) (40 Stat. 755; 16 U.S.C. 703-712), the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940
(16 U.S.C. 668-688d), and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 852; 42
U.S.C. 4321 etseq.).
Migratory birds are a Federal trust resource and are protected under the MBTA. Communication
towers and antennae may pose a hazard to migratory birds in flight and may pose a threat to
nesting birds in the vicinity. Risk assessment factors include tower height, physical design,
lighting, and site location relative to migratory corridors and bird concentration areas.
The Service has determined that the following proposed actions are not likely to adversely affect
Federally-listed species in New York, nor have any significant impacts on migratory birds or
other trust resources:
Co-location of new equipment and antennae with an existing structure (tower, water tank,
large building, etc.) where all ground disturbance occurs within previously disturbed
areas and where such activities do not increase the existing height or require the addition
of guy wires;
· Routine maintenance of existing tower sites (e.g., painting, antennae replacement); and
Repair or replacement of existing towers and/or equipment, provided such activities do
not increase the existing tower height or require the addition of guy wires.
For projects that meet the above criteria, there is no need to contact this office for project
review. This document may bc used as an ESA determination of"not likely to adversely affect"
for all Federally-listed species within New York.
Updated July 2006
SITE LICENSE AGREEMENT
This Site License Agreement ("SLA"), entered into this day of SEP ~ ~ Z0~ ,200__
between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, hereinafter designated LICENSOR and
MetroPCS New York, LLC, a Delawme limited liability company, hereinafter designated LICENSEE.
This SLA is a SLA as referenced in that certain Master Lease Agreement between T-MOBILE USA, INC., as
LICENSOR, and METROPCS, INC., as LICENSEE, dated May 30, 2006 ("MLA"). All &the terms and
conditions &the MLA are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof without the necessity
of repeating or attaching the MLA. In the event of a contradiction, modification or inconsistency between the
terms of the MLA and this SLA, the terms of the MLA shall govern and control. Capitalized terms used in
this SLA shall have the same meaning described for them in the MLA unless otherwise indicated herein.
Site No. and Name (if applicable): LICENSOR: L11341 lB / Maltituck
LICENSEE: NY 7312 /
Site Address and the Land which is more particolafly described in Attachment 1, attached hereto and
incorporated herein: 12585 Sound Ave., Mattituck, NY 11952
4. Site Latitude and Longitude: 40° 59' 26.00" Latitude / 72° 32' 20.00" Longitude
The LICENSEE Antenna Facilities to be placed on the Property and the location of the Premises are detailed
in and shall be consistent with Attachment 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
6. The term of this SLA shall be as set forth in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the MLA, except: No Exceptions
The Rent commencement date of the SLA shall be the first day of the month following the earlier of either; i)
one hundred twenty (120) days after full execution of this SLA; or (ii) the receipt by LICENSEE of writtan
notice from LICENSOR ora Notice to Procead permitting LICENSEE to commence construction
~The Rent for the first year of the initial term of this SLA shall be at an annual rental o~~ll~
[ I to be paid in equal monthly instalhnents on the first day of the
month, ia advance, to LICENSOR at the following address: PO Box 70870, CM 9762, St Paul, MN 55170 or
to such other person, firm or place as the LICENSOR may, from time to time, designate in writing at least
thirty (30) days in advance of any rental payment date. All Rent checks shall bare LICENSOR's site
number clearly written on the face of the check,
If the Property is subject to a prime lease, license or other such agreement affecting LICENSOR's interest of
the Prope~, a copy of such agreement is attached hereto as Attachment 3. If consant is required from Owner,
it shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment 4.
10. LICENSOR Contact for Emergency: Nec: (888) 662-4662
11. LICENSEE Contact for Emergency: Nec: (866) 672-6727
12. Special Provisions: None
13.
Amounts, if any, to be prepaid or reimbarsed by LICENSEE pursuant to Sections 6(b), 6 (c) or 6(e) of the
MLA. Pursuant LICENSEE shall pay an additional fee in the mount oi~l~
each month to LICENSOR along with Rent, as a pass
through of revanue sharing due to the Owner as specified in Paragraph 4 of the Prime Lease. This amount
shall be subject to the same annual increases as Rent.
T-Mobile Site Reference: LI 13411B / Mattimck 09/02/09; Page 1
MetroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hercto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day
and year first above written.
WITNESS
LICENSOR:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
PRINT NAME: Allan Tantillo
TITLE: Director, Tgyeor Asset Manan~ement
DATE:
WITNESS
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Legal Description of the Land
Attachment 2: Plans and Specifications
Attachment 3: Prime Lease
Attachment 4: Owner's Consent
LICENSEE:
MetroPCS New York, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
PRINT NAME:
DATE:
T-Mobile Site Reference: L11341 lB /Mattituck 09/02/09; Page 2
MetroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
l certify that I know or have setisfaetory evidence that Allan Tantillo is the person who appeared before me,
and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to
execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Director, Tower Asset Manangement ofT-Mobile Northeast LLC
to be the free and voluntary act of such par~, for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: SE? 2 5 2009
My commission expires __
Notary Public
Print Name
(Use this spec y stamp/seal)
COUNTY OF,, ~_ £.~F' )
I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that ~"~ O,A.e~ ~'[ is the person who
appear~ before me, and said ~rson a~owledg~ that he/she signetics ]nstrume~, on oas stated that he/she was
authorized to execum the ins~ument ~d ac~owledged it as the ~ ~ t ~/~ of
MetroPCS New York, LLC to be the 5ee ~d voluntary act of such pa~ for the uses ~d pu~oses mentioned ~ the
ins~ument.
Notary Public
Print Name
My commission expires
DIANE LAVELLE
NOTARY PUBLIC, State Of New York
No, Ol LA6027870
O~Jalii'ied In Westchester County,...
CoFnmission Exp)res July 19, 20/'-~
(Use this space for notary stamp/seal)
T-Mobile Site Reference: LI 13411B / Mattituck 09/02/09; Page 3
Me~oPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
ATTACHMENT 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND
to the SLA dated ;)C-[~ ~ ~ '~ 200__, by and between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, as
LICENSOR, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, as LICENSEE.
Legal Description of Land is described as follows:
]'-Mobile Site Reference: LI1341 lB / Mattituck 09/02/09; Page 4
MeIroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312/
ATTACHMENT 2
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
(including description of the antenna location, and location of ground
equipment on the ground portion of the Premises)
to the SLA dated SEP 2 5 ~[~ 200_, by and between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, as
LICENSOR, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, as LICENSEE.
Proposed Equipment is defined below and Plans and Specifications are attached hereto.
Number of Antennas:
Antenna Manufacturer and Type-Number:
Weight and Dimension of Antenna(s) (L x W x D)::
Number of Transmission Lines:
Transmission Line Mfr. and Type No.:
Diameter and Length of Transmission Line:
Location of Antenna(s) on Tower (Approved RAD Center):
Direction of Radiation (Azimuth):
Dimensions of LICENSEE Ground Space:
Frequencies/Max. Power Output:
MW Dish diameter/Mil'. & model # / approved RAD Center:
Additional Equipment (if any) to be placed on Tower:
(incl. RAD center, make, model, weight & dimensions)
Three (3) flush mounted to tbe nolo
Kathrein 80040504
17.6 lbs.. 54.1" x 6.1" x 2.7" (each)
Six (6) running inside pole shaft
Andrew FXL780
7/8"; 95'+/-
Seventy Five Feet (75')
30/150/270
10' x 16~
Tx: 2130-2140 MHz
Rx: 1730-1740 MHz
16 Wa¢~
N/A
Three (3) TMAs
Andrew ETW200VS 12UB
Seventy Five Feet (75')
11 lbs., 6.3" x 3.1" (each)
Notes:
The plans and specifications attached hereto are provided as SLA attachments only. Approved Final Canstmction
drawings are required prior to commencement of construction. Actual "as built" drawings shall be attached and
incorporated herein at the time of completion of cens{:rucfion.
2, This Attachment is to include may plans for routing lines, utility wires, etc. on or across the Land.
3. Frequency and Power Output information is provided for purposes of reenitoring compliance with the interference
sections only.
T-Mobile Site Reference: LII3411B / Mattituck 09/02/09; Page 5
MetroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
APPROVED
By JACKIE DONAHUE at 11:51 am, Apr 30, 2009
oEOROS~D HE,PO P¢5 .'4,'TL=N. A crYP [' 3) Ka~rein 800-~0504 aa~n,as~ ~
' ~ ~ (6) 7/~' lines inside pole
allow flag truc~og to operate
I successfully
I
~K LI~HTo~~ ~ ~ ~lSTIN~ ~UI~T
~T ELEVATION
~ L ~ V~T [ ON 125~5 5OUND AVENUE
~ ~ ~, ~ ~~"~metroP~
Gi~O U P- ~' LE-2
, ®
I APPROVED
o
I
DESIGN~
GROUP-
E~UIPPdENT PLAN
metroPCS.
ATTACHMENT 3
PRIME LEASE
to the SLA dated ~ED ~ ~ ~0~[} 200._~ by and between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, as
LICENSOR, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, as LICENSEE.
The Prime Lease is atlached hereto.
T-Mobile Site Reference: LI1341 lB / Mattituck 09/02/09; Page 6
MetroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
SITE LEASE WITH OPTION
THIS SITE LEASE WITH OPTION (this "Lea~") is by and hetwcen George L, ?enny, Ine~ CLendlord") and
Omnipoiflt Facilities Network 2, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liabl]ity Company("Tenazt"),
(a) In considexat/on of the payment of [the "Option Fee') by Tenant to
Landlord, Landlord hew. by grants to Tenant an option to leaze the u~ of a perlio/; of the real properly described in the attached
Exh/bit A (the "Property"), on tho terms and conditions act fosth herein (the "Option"). The Option sha]l be for an initial term of
tw¢Ivc (12) months, coramendng on the Effective Date (az defined below) (tha "Option Period"). The Option Period ma~V be
Tenant for 02) months upon written not/ce to Landlord and payment of the sum/
Option Fen'*) at any time prior to tho end of the Option Period.
Co) During the Option Period and any extension thereof, and during the t~rm of this Lease, Landlord agrees to
cooperate with Tenant in obtaining, at Tenant's expanse, all licences and permits or authorizations required for Tenant's use of the
Premises (aa defined below) from all applicable govemrneni and/or regulateD' entitle/(incled/ng, without lirnitation~ zoning and
land u~e anthorifias, and tl~ Federal Communication Commission ("FCC") COovemmental Appro~,als"), including appointing
Tenant as agent far all land use and zoning permit appiipatinus, and Landlord agrees to Cooperate with and to allow Tenant, at no
cost to Landlord; to obtain a rifle ropeR, zen/rig approvals and variances, land-use pen'n/ts, and Landlord ~xpressiy grant~ .t6"
Tenant a right of aceesa to the Property to p~forra survvys, sofia tests, and other en~i~.e, ering, prqqedure~ or efivironmental
investigations on the Property necessary to detarmina that Tenant's ~ of the Premises will be compatible with Tenant's
engineering spo~ificatious, syatem design, operations and Govea'nraental Approvals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant may
not change the zoning clazaificatinn of the Property without first obteining Landlo/d's written cousent. During the Opgon Period
and ~ny extension thereof, Landlord agrees that it w/ll not interfere with Tenant's efforts to aeenre other licenses and pexmit~ or
authorizations that relate to other property. Daring the Option Period and arty extension thereof, Tenani may exerei~ tho Option
by so notifying Landlord in writing at Landlord's address in accordance with Section 12 hereof.
(c) If Tenant exercians the Option, then, subject to the following terms and conditions. Landlord hereby lea~es to
Tenant tho use of that portion of the Property surf/dent for placement of the Antenna Fa¢illtiaz (as defined below), together with
all nicessany spac~ and easements for access and utilities, as generally de, acrlbed and depicted in the attached Exhibit B
(enlleetively ruPert-ed to here/ri&Pier az the "Premises"), Tho Premlaes, located at 125855 Sound Avenue Village of Matt tuck,
County of Suffolk, State of New York, comprises approximately 1,292 square feet.
2. Tent;. T~e initial term of this Lease ~all be five (5) yenra conunenc/ng on the date of the exerci~ of the Option
(the "Commencement Date"). and term/hating at midnight on tile last day of the initial term (the "Initial Terra").
3. Permitled USe. Tho Premla~s may be used by Tenant for the trausmiadon and reception of ra~lio coramunication
signals and for the construction, iustallation, operation, ma/ntenance, repair, removal or replacement of related faniliti~, tower
and base, antenna& microwave dishes, equipment shelters and/or cabinets and related activities.
4. Rent. Tenant shall pay Landlord, aa mat,
("Rants). the Commencement Date l~orated for the remalndex of the
month in therenfter Pent will bo payable manthly in advance by the fifth day of each
month to ipecifled in Section 12 below. If this Lease ia terrdnated at a time other
~han on the last day of a month, any reason (other than a default by
Tenant) and all prepaid Rent shal~ to Tenant,,
5. Renewal. Tenant/hall have the right to e~end this (each a 'Reaewal
Term unl~s Tenant notifies Laadhird, in writing, of Tenant's intention not to renew this Lense (60) days prior to
t~ exp~on of ~ IMfil T~ ~ ~y ~M Te~ IfT~t shM] r~n in poa~sion of
~s ~e or ~y Re~w~ T~ ~out a ~a~ agr~m~t, ~ch t~cy shall be d~ a mon~-~-~ ten.cyme
6, Inret'~ere~ce. Tenant shall not Uae the. Premi.w.a in any way which intederes with the use of the Property by
Landlord, or le.~ ess or licensees of Landlord with fights in the Property prior in time to Tenant's (subject to Tanent'$ rights under
this Leaz¢, including, without limitation, nonfntorferenco). Similarly, Landlord shall not use, nor shall Landlord peri'air its
(a) Tenant shall have the fight, at its =xpens~, to erect and ~t~n on t~ Pr~ses imp~v=~, pe~on~ prope~y
and fadli~ies n~ to ~= i~ ~mmu~ffons s~t~m, inolud~g, ~oul ]i~on, r~o i~s~tfing md ~i~g
T~mt ~ hav~ the h~t ~ ~t~, ~pl~, ~x~n~ e~ ~ up~e ~ Antra Fa~li~es ~ ~ g~ dung ~e ~ of
I~s ~e, T~t sh~l c~ ~[ c~ to ~'lien-t~ ~d ~ ~mpli~ with ~1 applicabl~ lawi ~d or~i~.
defin~ below) C'Gon~on Int~en~"). ~ord ~h~ a~wl~ges ~a it w~l ~ r~mible ~r ~y ~s~ md
~es (~cl~ing, fi~s ~ ~fies) ~t ~ ~r~fly a~m~l~ m ~d's Cons~cgon lnted~e. ~ ~a
~acilifies shffiI rcm~n lhe ~dusivc pro~y of Tc~t. Tenet shall have the fi~t to ~ve ~e Antenna ~a~i~es ~ ~y time
~d te~ ~d ~ual~
P~y (Edudin~ but nol ~ted to, ~c i~all~on d cm~gcncy ~w~ ~nerato~). ~dlord a~ to u~ ~on~ble
~tiIifies used on thc Pro~ by Tan~L ~dlo~
(e) As ~E consi~afion for R~t ~d under t~s ~, ~o~ ~r~ ~B T~mt m ~nt.in, un~ md
s~ice cabl~, ~ to s~i~ ~e ~e~ ~d ~ Ant~n~ F~ities at ffi ~ ~ng th~ ]nili~ T~ of ~s ~ ~d ~y
Te~ ~ ~s ~ md
im~ or denie~
8. ~. Ex. as o~e~i~ ~d~ ~n, ~is ~e ~y be ~na~d, wi~ut ~y ~ty or ~er
liabilit~ m follows:
(a) upon ~i~ O0) days' ~n noti~ by ~dlord if Toner f~ls ~ cu~ a ~fault for pa~ent of ~ due und~
~s ~ase ~ ~hat ~i~y (~) day ~dod;
(b).i~a~ly tf T~t n~fies ~d of u~e~le r~ul5 of ~y ~itk report. ~vironmant~ or soft t~ ~or
or ~6els ~y ~nso (~udi~, ~ut
una~epmble ~ T~t's d~ or en~fi~ ~;;~c;':~,- t~ ~. a~t~n~ Facilities or ~e eomm~cations syst~ 1o
whi~ t~ Antenna Fadlifiea belong;
(d) i~di~y upon
in Ten~t's ~sonabl, judg~nt to subs~ly ~d adv~ly ~t
all'~h~tons ~ as of the date of thc damage or destruction, and Tenant shall be entitled to the
reixobur~ -- asu, th~ all Rent shall abate tmtil the Premises
and/or the/rattans Facilities are restored to the coddilion existing immediately prior to sue . etlon; or
(¢) at the tiree title to the Property transfers to a condemning authority, pursuant to a taking of ali or a portion of the
Property sufficient in Tenant's d~terminafion to rand~r the Premises unsuitable for Tenant's use. Lancliotd and Tenant shall each
be ~utifled.to pursue their own separa~: awards with r~esp~ct to such tai6ng. Sale of all or part of thc Ptoporty to a purchaser with
the power of eminent dorealn in lh¢ fac~ of the exen:i8¢ cf the power shall b~ tte. ated as a taking by conderanadon.
9. Default and Right to Cure. Notwithstanding anyflfing contained herein to the contrary and without waiving any
other rights granted to it at law or in equity, cash.party abail have the right, but net the obligation, to tarralnat~ this .Le~ on
writtea nefic~ porauant to Section 12 h~e. of, to take effect immediately, if the other' party (i) fails to perform any covenant for a
pexind of thirty (30) days afu~r r ec~ipt of ~ttcn notic~ thereof to cure or (ii) commits a material breach of this L~ase and fails to
diligently pursue such cure to its completion after sixty (60) days' written notlc~ to the defaulting patty.
.L~- Taxes. Landlord shall pay whan due ab ~eal preporty tax~s for the Properl3*, including the Premises. In the ~vcnt
that LarsdIo~'~:~q~o,p~y any such roai property taxes or othor fees and asSassre~nts, T~nant shall have the right, but not the
obligation; ~ pay anch owc~d~mo~ts and deduct them frore Rent amounts duc under this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Tenant shall pay .an~. ~l~_p~~ tax or ~.y oth~.r tax or fac which are directly at~batable to tl~ pr~nce
or ir~tallation of the Tanant'~ Antenna Fac/lui~o long as this Lease Ires not expired of its own terms or is not
tcnninat~ by eith~x pa~y. Landlord hexchy gran~ to ~ar~ght to challcuge, whether in a Court, Administre~va
Proceeding, or other v~dlord and/or Tenant, any pe~y or ~eal property~tax as~ssta~nts that may
may affect Tcnaat ~1 provi& t~ely~.i~of th4.a~sessmant to
T~nant sufficient to ~~dlord shall ptovi~t~e~]~any and
all dneum~ntat~on.~easonably necessary to effect~lte tim
intcut of this Section I0.
Il. Insurance ami 5ubroeatinn and Indemnification.
(a) Tenant shall previde commercial Gen~ Liability Insurance in an aggregate amount of One lvh'lllon and ne/100
dollax~ ($1.000.000.00). Tenant may sutis~ this requh'emcut by obtaining the appropriate endorsement to any master policy o~'.
liability insuran~ Tenant may maintain. '
(b} Landlord and Tenant hereby mutoablly release each other (and their successors or assigns) from liability and waive
all right ofmcuvery against fl~ other for any loss or danlage covered by their respective ftrat pony prepeay thsumnee policies for
gt pexil~ insured the~reander. 'In thc cvcut of such insu~d loss, neither par ty'a insurance company shail have a sub~ogated claire
against the other. To the extent loss or damage is not covered by thuit fa'at party properly insurance policies, Landlord and
T¢osat each agre~ to indemnify and hold harmies~ the other pasty frore and against any and all claims, damages, cost and
expofises, including re~onable attorney fees, to the extent cau~xl.by or arising out of (a) the negligent acts or omissions or
willful misconduct in the openaions or activities on th~ P~oporly by the Indemnifying party or the ereployeos, agents, contractors,
licensees, tanants and/or sob~nants of the indew~ffylag patty, or ('o) a breach o:~ any obligation of the inOemnifying patty under
this la~ase. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this indamalfieation shall not extand to inditeS, special, in¢idemal or consequential
damages, Inaluding, wifllout .limitation, loss of profits, income or business opportunities to the indemnified party or anyone
claiming through the indemnified party. ~ indareaifying PartY's obligations unde~ this suction ate contingent upon (i) its
receiving prompt written notice of any event giving rise to an obligation to indemnifying the other party and (it) the indemnified
party's granting it thc tight to control th~ defense and setflen~nt of the santo. Notwithstanding anything to tho contraty in this
Lease, the panics hereby confirm that the provisior~s of this section shall suiwiv¢ the expiration or t~rmination of this Lease.
Tana~t shill not be responsible to Landlord, or any third-party, for any claims, costs at damages (including, fm~ and penalties)
attributable to any pre-existing violations of applicable codes, statutes or other regulations govereing the Property, including the
Premises.
12. Nolic~. All notices, re, quests, demands and othln' coranmnicatioos shall b~ in w-tiring and are effecti'~ thr~ (3)
days afl~t d~po,~t in thc U.S. mail, cortified and postage paid, or upon r~ipt if perannally delivered or sent by ni~xt-bualn~s-day
delivery Yin a nationally recognized ovemlgin courier to the addrassas sst forth below. Landlord or Tenant may from 6xac to
time designate any other addrees for this purple by previdlng written notice to the othe~ party.
Voicestream Wireless Corporation
12920 SE 385~' Street
Bellevue, WA 98006
At/n: PCS Least Administrator
With a copy to: Arm: Legal Dept,
If to Landlord, to:
George L, Penny, I~,
PO Box 2067, Ot~nport, NY 11944-
With a cot)v to:
Omnipotht Facilities Network 2, LLC
360 Newark-Pompton Turnpike
Wayne, N~w Jersey 07470
Attn: Le~e Adn~nistration Manager
I3. Ouie~ E~iovmcnt. Title and An{huHtv. Laudlord ~ven~m ~d w~ts ~ T~{~t ~at (1) L~dlord
po~ and ~tho~ to ~e~te ~s ~e; 0i) it h~ good ~d ununcumbg~.tMe ~ the Prepay ~ ~d el~ of any liens or
mo.gages, ex.pt tho~ ~sdo~ to T~t ~ wMch will not inteffe~ with Ten~'s rJ~ts to or use of ~e Pre~ses; ~d
~x~ution ~d ~rfo~ of tMs ~ ~ ~t violin ~y Mw$, o~i~, cuvc~, or ~ provi~ons of ~y
1~; or o~ ~nt ~ing on-~& ~o~ ~v~ tb~ at all fim~ d~ng the ~ of tM$ ~e,' T~t's q~
anjoym~nt of ~e Pre~ or ~y p~ fl}creel ~ ~t be disnirbed ~ long ~ Tenet ~ not m default beyond ~y app~ble
14. ~viro~m~M ~ws:, L~dlord ~n~ ~ it h~ no kno~l~ge of ~ subst~ce, ch~
-(colle~ively, 'tHaddeus Subst~ce ) oa ~e. P~pe~y ~ is i~tifi~ ~ h~s, to~c or d~g~ous in ~y a~licabk
federal, state or I~ la& ~ regimen. ~dloM ~- %n~t ~fll not inlr~6~e or use ~Y H~do~ $ubst~ on the
Pr~ny in violation of ~y appli~ble law. ~loM sh~l be ~pon~Me for, ~d ~l pm~fly conduct ~y inv~sfi~fion ~d
retaliation as requi~ by ~y app]i~le envimnmem~ laws~ ~1 spi~ or o~r relcas~ of ~y H~u$ Substance ~ caus~
solely by T~t, that ~ve ~ or wM~ ~ ~c~ on ~e Pmk. Each p~y ~s ~ dffeM, in&~i~ ~d hold
· h~ess the o~er from ~d ag~nst ~y ~d all ~is~ative ~ j~idal a~ions an~ ~gs, c~, ~auses of a~ion,
~d liability (~ll~tively, "CI~") ~6uding. bm n~ l~ted to. d~, c~, exp~nse5. ~smen~, ~n~fies,
judg~n~ ~d r~onable att~ey ~s ~at ~ in~i~ may suff~ or incur due to ~e exi~ence or ~seov~ of ~y
H~d~s $u~t~s on ~e Pro~y or ~ ~on of ~y H~wd~s $ubs~ ~ ot~r p~p6~es or the rel~g of ~y
H~d~s Subs~ in~ ~ envk~m (~B ~fively, "'Acfions~, ~at mla~ ~ or ~se ~m ~e ind~tor's a~ivities on
~opeay, ~dloM ~ th ~d, m~ify ~d hold T~t h~s from C~ resMfing ~om Actions on
Mde~ficatio~ M ~s s~oB s~c~ly i~clude, ~t l~on, costs lncu~ed in coition wi~ ~y invesfi~ti~ of site
con~lions or ~y cle~up, re~ial, ro~v~ or r~mtbn work ~ulr~ by ~y govcmmentM numeriC. ~s S~tion 1~ sh~l
a~ive the re.nation ~ e~plnfion of ~s ~as~.
h~x~in upon ~tun ~to ~oM, U~n ~ ~fi~uk %n~t sh~l b~ r~liev~ of ~l liabiHfi~ ~d obhgagom
heleuud~ ~d ~ord sh~ololy to ~ ~¢ for ~ce ~der tMs ~a~ ~d ~1 o~gaions h~reund~
may sublea~ the
Additionally, ~t m~, u~n nofi~ ~, magag~ ~ g~t'a a~ufity in.rest ~ ~s ~e ~ ~ Antra
Facilities, ~d ~y assi~ ~ t~ Au~ F~l~y ~ or hol~ of ~urity int~. in~lud~g th~
suc~ssors or as~~Mo~), ~d~ ~ ~ ~ to be bound by the ~s ~d ~visions of
~is ~as~ In $u~ ev~ L~lord ~1 ~e~te such ~n~nt ~ le~ing ~ ~y r~onably be r~Mr~ by
Mo~g~ees. ~ord a~ t~en~t ~t'~o~s si~t~of ~y default by Tguant ~d to giw
M~gag~s the s~e fight to cur~~ ~ ~ve ~y ~op~y of~or M~gagegs lo~d on
Pre~ses, excep~~~ be I~ ~ ~) ~ys a~t of ~ ~ault
P~ses ag ~ovid~ in'S~tiou t7 of~s ~e.
16. Su~on ~ Amiens. ~s ~e ~d ~e Eas~men~ ~ted herein ~1 ~u ~th the I~d, ~d ~hfll be biuding
upon ~ in~re to the benefit ~ p~es, their m~ive su~sors, pe~nM ~pre~tiv~ ~ ~si~.
17. Waiver of ~dloM's ~en. ~oM ~reby w~ves ~y md ~ lien ~gh~ it may have, s~to~ or o~erwise,
conce~ng ~ Antenna F~iHti~ ~ ~y posen ~f, wM~ shg{ ~ ~em~ ~no~ prop~ for ~e pu~gs ofthls
whefl~er or not the ~ is ~m~ ~fl or p~sonal ~y un~r applicab{e laws, ~d Lan~ord Sves Tenet ~d Mortgagees
the right to ~move MI or ~y ~ou of the sine ~om ti~ to ~me, whe~ ~fo~ or ~er a default und~ tMs ~ase, in
lg. Miscellaneousl
(a) The prevailing party in any litigation arising her~ander shat[ b¢ entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court
costs, including appeals, if any.
Co) Each pa~y agrees to,furnish to the other, within twenty (20) days after rexluest, such truthful estoppel information as
the other may reasonshly request,
(¢) This Lease eonsiltutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations
Lease must be in writing ~nd executed by both parties,
0:D. a~.~parry agrees to ~ooperate with lhe'other in execoting ;my'documente (including a Memcaandum of Lease in
substantially the fo~--'attach~l~rrdo..~Exhibit Gl necessary to protect its rights or uso of th9 Premises. The Mem6randam of
Lease may be recorded in place of this ~'e'brekl~rdla~k~. 1 n tile 9vent the Property is encumbcn~d by a mortgage, or d~ed of
trast, Landlord agrees, upon ~~distmbanee and attainment agreement for
each guch mortgage or deed ~~ranee on its inter&st
in the Premises. Landlord ~vire in eonnectton~
(o) Tuts Lease shall be aonstrued iff accordanc~ with the laws of the state in which the Property is located,
(f) If any tern} of this ~4$as¢ ts f~und ~o be '~uld or invalid, such finding shall not affeot the remaining tom of this
Lease, which shall eonfintm iff full farc~ and ¢ffeet: Ti~¢ pigtie$ agree that'if any provisions are deemed not etifcacaabt~, they
shell he deemed inedited to th~ extent mu~ssary to make them anfoseeabl¢. Any questions of particular int~pretafion shall not
hq.interpreted against th~ draftsman, but ratherAn.aecordanee with the fair meaning thereof, No provision of this Le~se will ho
deemed waived by either party anleas expressly waived in writing signed by the waiving party. NO waiver shall be implied by
delay ca any other act or omission of either party, No waiver by either party of any provision of this Lease shell be decreed a
waiver of saeh provision with respect to any subsequent matter relating to such provision.
(g) Th~ p&sons who have eXecuted this Lease represent and war~ant that they are duly authorized to ex,cute this Lease
in their individual or repreaeet ative;, c apaaity as indicated,
(h) 'llzis Lea~ may be executed in suy number of counterpart copies, each of which shall be deemed an original, bet ail
of wblch together shall constitute a single instrument.
~ r~erred to herein and any Addenda are incorporated her~in for ail purposes. Tho parti~s understand
and acknowledge that ~ ~m~ of tbe Property) and Exhibit B (the Premises location within the Prop~'ty),
may be at~ o / -- ~ngly, th~ parties agsee that upon tim
preparati~my ' - vebeen attached hereto in
preliminary form, may b~ ~placed by Tanant with such final, more compinte exhibit(s). Tho terms o ' ' are
incorporated herein for ail purposes.
0) If Landlold is feprgsea~ted by any brok¢~ er any other leasing agent, Landlord is responsible for ail commission fee
ca other payumat to such agent, and agrees to indemnify and.hold'Tenant harmless from ail claims by such broker or anyane
claiming through anoh broker. If Tenant is represented by any broker or any other leasing agenh Tenant is responsible for all
commission f~ or other payment to such agent, and agrees to indonmify mid hold Landlord harmless from all claims hy such
broker or anyone eiaiallng through saeh b~ol~r
The effective date of this Lease is thc date of execution by the last party to sign (the "Effective Date").
LANDLORD:
By:
PdntedName:
Its:
· Date:
George L. Penny, Inc.
LANDLORD: '
By:
Approved a~ to form
ADDENDUM TO SITE LEASE WITH OPTION
[Additional Terms]
Iff t~ event of conflict or iacens.istency betwcan the terms of thi~ Addeedum and this Lease, the terms of the Addendum shall
govern end con~oL All capitalized terms shall have the sam~ meaning as in t~s Lense,
1. Paragraph? is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced ~ follows:
~,. Rent. Tenant shall pay Landlord. as. rem Rent
shall increase on anch anniversary of the Commencement Date by en amount e~
twelve (12) month period CRenf'). Rent shall be payabl~ m advenca hegiradog on the Commenc~meur Da~e prorated l~r the
remainder of the month in which the Commencement Date falls and thereafter Ren~ will be-pa)able inonthiy in advance by the
fifth day of each month to Landlord at Landlord's address specified in Section 12 bdow. Tenant shall pay Landlord the greater
of 0) an additiofiai Five Hundred Dollars per month for each aadifienal snblessee of Tenant or (ii) fifty percent (50~) of any
rent collected from each additional suble~sen of Tenant ("Addilional Rent"). In the event that this l~a~e is subleased, the
sublessec sl~l be subject to annual Rent increases in the amount of four per cent (4%) pet year. If this Lease ia terminated at a
time other than on the last day of a month, Rent shall be prorated a~ of the date of termination for any reason.other than a
ddfan]t by Tenant, and all prepnid Rent shall be immediately refunded to Tenant.
2. Paragraph 5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:
5. R~q~'w~. Tenant troll have the right m extend this Lease for five (fi) additional, five-yenr terms ("Renewal Term"). Each
Renewal Term shall been th~ same terms and conditions as s~t forth herein, exert that Rent shall be increased l
........ I This Lease shall anmmaticelly renew for
e.o~h successive R~newei Term unless Tenant notifies Landlord, tn writing, of Tenant's intention not 16 renew this Lease, at
least sixty (60) days prior t? the expiration of the Initial Tera~ or any Renewal Term. If Tenant shall rem~dn in poa~ssion of
the Premises at the expiration of flti~ Lease or any Renewal Term without a written agreement, such tenancy shall be deemed a
month4o-month tenancy under the same terms aml conditions of this Lease, except Tenant shall lay Landlord 150% of tho
3, Paragraph 7(0 is hereby deleted in its enfir*ty and replaced as follows:
7(0 Tenso/shall have ~4-hunm-a. day, 7.days-a-week access to the Preroi~e~ at all times during the Initial Term of this Lease
and any Renewal Term
3. paragraph 7(g) is hereby added ac follows:
(g) If any lien is filed against the Property as a direct result of the ant or omission of Tenant, Tenant's agents, cOntractor, or
· employees, Tenant will cause su*h Ilea to be discharged or appropriately bonded or othenvise roasenably secured
("Secured") within sixty (60) days after netice from L~ndlord thereof. If Tenant fails re cause the lien to be Secured within
the silty (60) day p~fied, then Landlord will he entitled, but not obligated to, alit, charge or bend the stone. Tenant will
indenmify and save Landlord harmless from all liabilities and costs to the extent resulting directly from Tenunt'a failure to
timely see~ro same.
4. Paragraph 8{¢) is hereby deleted in i~ entirety end replaced as follows:
'8(c) upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice by Tenant if the Property, or the Antenna Facilities me or becOme
unaeneptable under Ten~mt's design or engineering specifications for its Ant~na Faallitie$ or the communications system to
which the Antenna Faallides belong;
5. Paragraph 8(d) is hereby deleted il~ its entirety and replaced as follows:
g(d) immediately upon written notice by Tenant ff ~ Building or thc Antenna Facilities are destroyed or damaged and ara
covered by insurance permitting restoration of the Prenfi~s or tl~ Antenna Faeilltim. In such event, ail rights and obligations
of the patties shall cease as of the date of the damage or destraction, end Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any
Rent prepaid by Tenant. If Tenant elects to continue tMa Lease, then all Rent shall abate until the Prmnises and/or Antenna
Facilities are restored to the condition e~ting Immediately prior to such damage or destruction; or
6. Paragraph 8(0 is hereby added as follows:
(f) upoo expiration or termination of the Lease, Tenant shall remove the Antenna Facilities and e4uipment and if the same is
not removed' within sixty (60) days of the date of the expiration or termination of this Lease, Landlord may remove same at
Tenant's expense. This provision shall survive expiration er termination of the Lease,
7. Paragraph 10 is hereby deleted.' n its entirety and rep aced as follows:
i0. Taxes. Landlord shall pay when duc all mai ptopel~ taxes for the Property, inchid/ng the Premises. In the event that
Landlord fails to pay any such real propexty taxes or othe~ fee~ and esanssm~nts, T~nant shall have thc right, but not the
obligation, m pay such owed amounts and deduct them from Rent amounts due under this Lease. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Tenant shall pay any personal property tax, real property tax, or any 9ther tax or f~e which ar~ dirantly attributable
to the presence or installation of Tenant's Antanna Facilities. only for so long as this Lease has not expired of its own tc~ms or
is not terminated by either pazny and until T~nant's equipment :is removed. Landlord hereby grants to Tenant the right to
challenge, whether in a Court, Administrative Proceeding, or other venue, on b~alf of Landlord and/or Tenant, any personal
property mx assessment against the Landlord, which may affect Tenant and is directly att~butable to Tenant's installation.
· 8. Paragraph 15 is hereby deleted h its entirety and replaced as
15.- Assi'gn~nent and Subleasing. Tenant'may assigt~ lkis Lease and L~e Easement (a~ defined below) granted herein upon
written notice to Landlord. Upon at, eh aesignmeet, Tenant shall be relieved of all liabilities' and obligations harennder and
Landlord shall look solely to the assignee for performance under this lense and all obligations hereunder. Tenant may sublease
the premises, upon va~tten notice to Landlord, provided Tenant's agreement with may ~ublesse~ shalYinclude terms and
eondltiona similar to this "Site Lease with Option'*. Tenant gball sublease only m another company in good financial standing.
Additionally, Tenant may, upon notice to Landlord, mortgage.or grant a security interest in this Lease sad the Antenna
Facilities, and may assign this Le~se and ~ Anterma Facilities to any mortgagees or holders of security interests, including
their successors or assigns (collacliveiy "Mortgagees"), provided such Mortgagees agree to be bound by the terms
provisions of this Lease. In such event, Landlord shall cxecuta such consent to leasehold financing as may reasonably be
required by Mortgage~. Landlord agrees to notify Tenant and Tenant's Mortgagees simultaneously of any default by Tenant
and. to give Mortgagees the same right to core any default as Tenant or to remove any properly of Tenant or Mortgagees
located on the premises, except tha~ the cure period for any Mortgagees shall not,be less thau thirty (30) days after receipt of
the default notice, as provided in Seet~or~ 9 of fltis Lease. All such notices to Mortgagees shall be sent to Mortgagees at the
address specified by Tenant. Failure by Landlorti to give Mortgagees such holies shall not diminish Landlord's rights against
Tensest, but shall preserv~ all rights of Mortgagees to cure any default and to remove any property of Teuant or Mortgagees
located on the Premises as provided in Section 17 of this Lasso.
9. Paragraph 18(d) is hereby deleted in its entirety ~ replaced as follows:
(d) .Each party agrees to cooped'ate wi~ the other in executing any documents necessary tq p,:oteet/ts fights or use of the
Premises. In the event the Pruperty is e. nen~heted by a mortgage or deed of trust, Landlord agrees to use its best efforts, upon
request of Tenant, to obtain and fumiab to Tenant a nan-disturbance and attqmment agreement for each such mortgage or deed
of tmst, in a form reasoi~ably acceptable to Tenant. Tenant may obtain title insurance on its interest in the Premises. Landlord
agrees to execute such documents as the title company may require in connection thorowith.
10. Paragraph lg(i) is horeby delelnd i~ its entkety and replaced es follows:
~i.) AIJ l~xhiblts refer~t to herein am:i any Addenda are incorporamd herein for all porpos~s. The parties understand and
acknowledge that Exhibit A (thc Iagal description 0f the Property) and Exhibit B (the Premises location within the Propeny)~
may be attached to this l..~.se in preliraina~ form. Accordingly, the parties agree that upon the preparation of final, more
complete exllthits, Exhibit A and/or Exhibit B, ss thc ease may be, which may have been attached h6reto in preliminary form,
may be replaced by Tenant with such final, more cempl~¢ exhibit(s). The terms of all Exldbits am incorporated herein for all
porposes.
LANDLORD:
By:
George L Penny,
LANDLORD:
Printed Name:
Date:
TENANT: Orta~point Facilities Network 2, LLC
Date:
Mock,t: NYBTA
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
The Propcrt7 is legally d~cribed as follows:
Se~i~n 14I, Block 3, Lot 35.001, 37, 38 & 20
EXHIJ~IT Il
The location of the premises wRhin the Property (together with access and utilities)
is more particularly described and depicted as follows:
Sce ~taehed lease exhibits by William F Collins, AIA ArchiCe, cts. LLP.
REMNN,
MATTITUCK
1~5855 SOUND A~ENUE
J~ATT[?UCK, NY 11952
~ ~RI~ m OTHERS.
MONOCLE AT 100' AOL,
~ E~IPME~ P~N
.~ ~, MATTITUCK
[Notary bloek for Corporation, partnership, Lfinited Liability Company}
COUN~ OF <ffu. FFa~-~
said [name of entity],
Dated:
Notar~ l~a
(Use this space for ~otary stamp/se~)
/Notary block fer Individual]
'STATE OF
COUNTY OF
This inst~ment
was acknowledged before me on by
Dated:
Notary Public
Print Naa~
My commi~ion ~pire~
(Use this space for nctaw starnp/soal)
[Notary block for Tenant]
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Joseph M. Walsh is the person who appeared before
me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this ins{mment, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute
the instrament and acknowledged it as the Technical Director of Omnipoint Facilities Network 2, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Version 10-2-01
Liability Company, to be the. free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and pm'poses mentioned in the
instram~nt, t?/~g
Dated: ~ fi'
Notary Pablic
(Use this space for notary stamp/s~al)
ATTACHMENT 4
OWNER'S CONSENT
to the SLA dated SED ~~ ~ ~0~]9 200__, by and between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, as
LICENSOR, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, as LICENSEE.
O net s Consenl s attached hereto frequ red under the Prone Lease.
T-Mobile Site Reference: LII341 lB / Mattituck 09/02/09; Page 7
MetroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
MetroPCS New York, LLC
5 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, NY 10532
Attn: Property Management
Site # NY7312 (Tower License)
MEMORANDUM OF LICENSE
to the SLA dated 200__, by and between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, as
LICENSOR, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, as LICENSEE.
This Memorandum of Site License Agreement is entered into on this __ day of ,200
("SLA Effective Date"), by and between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with ~n
office at 12920 SE 38th St., Bellevue, WA 98006 (hereinafter referred to as "LICENSOR") and MettoPCS New
York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with an office at 5 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
(hereinafter referred to as "LICENSEE").
LICENSOR and LICENSEE entered into a Site License Agreement ("SLA") on the __ day of
,200~ for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining a radio communications
facility and other improvements. All of the foregoing are set forth in the Site Lease Agreement.
The term of the SLA is for five (5) years commencing on , 200__ and ending on
, with four (4) successive five (5) year options to renew. If all options to
renew are exercised, the term of this SLA will expire twenty-five (25) years after the SLA Effective Date
(as defined in the SLA).
The Land is described in Attachment 1 annexed hereto.
The original copy of this SLA is held at the LICENSOR's and LICENSEE's addresses set forth above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandmn of Site License Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.
LICENSOR:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
LICENSEE:
MetroPCS New York, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: By:
(Signature) (Signature)
Allan Tanfil]o
(Print) (Print)
Title: Director, Tower Asset Manangemant Title:
Date: Date:
T-Mobile Site Re ference: L113411B / Mattituck 09/02/09; Page 8
MelroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Allan Tantill0 is the person who appeared before me,
and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to
execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Director, Tower Asset Manengement of T-Mobile Northeast LLC
to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated:
Notary Public
Print Nmne
My commission expires
(Use this space for notary stamp/seal)
STATE OF )
COUNTY OF )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who
appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was
authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of
MetroPCS New York, LLC to be the free end voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the
instrument.
Dated:
Notary Public
Print Name
My commission expires
(Use this space for notary stamp/seal)
T-Mobile Site Reference: L11341 lB / Mattitnck 09/02/09; Page 9
Met~oPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
MEMORANDUM OF LICENSE
ATTACHMENT 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND
Legal Description of Land is described as follows:
T-Mobile Site Reference: L113411B / Mattimek 09/02/09; Page 10
MetroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Metro?CS New York, LLC
5 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, NY 10532
Attn: Property Management
Site # NY7312 (Tower License)
MEMORANDUM OF LICENSE
to the SLA dated S~-D 2 [ 2[~09 200__, by and between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, as
LICENSOR, and MetroPCS New York, LLC, as LICENSEE.
This Memorandum of Site License Agreement is entered into on this __ day of ~ED ,~ ~ ~0~00-
("SLA Effective Date"), by and between T-Mobile Northeast LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with an
office at 12920 SE 38th St., Bellevue, WA 98006 (hereinafter referred to as "LICENSOR") and MetroPCS New
York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with an office at 5 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
(hereinafter referred to as "LICENSEE").
I. LICENSOR and LICENSEE entered into a Site License Agreement ("SLA') on the day of
~[~ ~ ~ 2[~0~ , 200__, for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining a radio communications
facility and other improvements. All of the foregoing are set forth in the Site Lease Agreement.
The term of the SLA is for five (5) years commencing on ., 200~ and ending on
, with four (4) successive five (5) year options to renew. If all options to
renew are exemised, the term of this SLA will expire twenty-five (25) years after the SLA Effective Date
(as defined in the 8LA).
3. The Laud is described in Attachment t annexed hereto.
4. The original copy of this SLA is hold at the LICENSOR's and LICENSEE's addresses set forth above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Site License Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.
LICENSOR:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
By: /~ ~'a Delaware~bility COlnpany
~'~ (Signature)
Allan Tantillo
(Print)
Title: Director. Tower Asset Manan~ement
Date: SEP 2 5 2009
LICENSEE:
MetroPCS New York, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
(Print)
Date:
T-Mobile Site Reference: L11341 lB / Matlltuck 09/02/09; Page 8
MetroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
1 certify that i know or have satisfactory evidence that Alia0 Tantillo is the person who appeared before me,
and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to
execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Director. Tower Asset Manangement of T-Mobile Northeast LLC
to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated:
PrintNotary Name Public
My commission expires
STATEOF //~&,, { A<,rl~. )
- I ) ss.
COUNTY OF /,~ ~,~r¢-~' )
I cmi¢ that ~ know or have satisfactou evidenm ,hat ~ ~ff[ is the person who
appe~ ~fore me, and said ~rson ec~owledg~ ~at he/she signed this instrumen{, on oath st~ed th~ h~she was
authorized to execute the ins~ument ~d ecknowledgnd it as the ~IJP, ~ r of
MetroPCS New York, LLC to be the ~ee md volunta~ act of such p~ for the uses and pu~oses mention~ in the
instrument,
(Use this space for notary stamp/seal)
Notary Public
Print Name
My commission expires
DIANE LAVELLE
NOTARY PUBI.iC, State Of New York
No. 01LA6027870
Qualified In Z.'astohestcr Count,/,,.,
Commission Expir0s July 19, 20
T-Mobile Site Reference: L11341 lB / Mattituck 09/02/09; Page 9
MetroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
MEMORANDUM OF LICENSE
ATTACHMENT 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND
Legal Description &Land is described as follows:
T-Mobile Site Reference: L11341 lB / Mattituck
MotroPCS Site Reference: NY 7312 /
09/02/09; Page I0
I. ALL CONSTRUCTION, LABOR AND MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY INITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE BUILDING CODES, ORDINANCES AND
TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF ALL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION.
2. THE CONT~TO~ MUST VISIT TH~ ~1~ AN~ ~ ~ON~I~LE ~0~ V~IF~IN~ ALL ~IM~N~IONS ANO ~ONOITION~. AN~
DISCrEPANCIeS ~HALL ~E ~O~T~O TO THE A/E ~O~ P~O~EOIN~ ~IT~ AN~ ~O~K, PURCHASE, FA~I~ATION AND
OF AN~ ~AT~IAL.
9. TH~ OONT~AOTO~ SHALL A~AN~E ANO PA~ ~0~ ALL PE~ITS, A~P~O~AL~, INS~EOTIONS ANO TE~T~ ~E~WI~ED ~Y ALL
4. TH~ ~ONT~A~TO~ ~HALL ~O~IOE ALL ITemS O~ LA~O~ ANO ~AT~IALS, ~HETHE~ O~ NOT ~P~i~I~ALL~ ~N~I~ATED,
~E~UI~EO TO ~O~FLET~ THE INSTALLATION.
~. THE ~ONT~A~TO~ ~HALL ~ ~SFONSI~LE ~0~ AOE~UAT~ ~AOIN~ AND P~OTE~TIN~ OF ALL ~0~ DU~IN~ OONST~U~TION
TO AVOID OA~A~, OOLLAF~E, DJSTO~TION, ~I~ALI~N~ENT, ~O~OlN~ ~OOFIN~ ~UA~ANT~S ANO ~A~ANTI~S, ~T&
SHALL DE IN OO~LIAN~E ~ITH ALL A~LIOADL~ OOO~S, STANOA~O~ AND D~ST ~AOT~OES. ~OO~ SURFACES SHALL
~STO~EO TO ~O~PL~T~ ~ATE~ TI~HTN~ ~ITH TH~ A~OM~O ~ATE~IAL AND AS ~E-APP~OM~O D~ THE O~N~ IN ~ITIN~.
ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS.
"'7. DO NOT SCALE DRAININGS.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR FULL P,/~SPONSIBILI"F"F FOR THE MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTING THE INOR''F--. SHOINN ON
THESE PLANS. ALL INORK PERFORMED SHALL BE DONE 1N A GOOD Y, IORKMANSHIP MANNER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OYINER.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY EFFORTS TO PROTECT THE NEIN EQUIPMENT DURING THIS INSTALLATION AND
APPLICATION SUCH AS,
-THE TENANT'S EGRESS TO AND FROM THE BUILDING AND/OR THE SITE.
-THE BUILDING'S FIRE SAFETY OR SHALL NOT CREATE ANY FIRE HAZARDS.
-THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND SAFETY OF THE BUILDING.
-THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY CREATION Of= NOISE OUTSIDE THE NO~AL HOURS O~ ~ A~ TO ~ P~, UNLESG OTHBR~ISE A¢~EEO
U~ON ~ITH THE O~NE~.
-THE BUILOlN~'S 5EOU~I~ SHALL ~E ~AINTAINEO IN ORDER TO P~VENT ANY UNAUTHO~IZEO PE~SON5 ~O~ ENTE~IN¢ TH~
P~EMI~E~.
-THE BUILOIN~'S UTILI~'5 (ELEOT~IOIT% 8A5, HATE~ AND OTHE~ UTILI~'S) SHALL NOT BE INTErrUPTED OURIN~ THIS
APPLICATION ~ INSTALLATION.
-ALL ~ASON~Y P~NET~ATIONS SHALL ~E OONE USIN~ ~OTA~ ACTION ONLY (NO HA~IN¢ ACTION).
BA~IE~ SEALANT. MAINTAIN THE FI~E ~ATIN¢ OF ALL PENET~ATEO SURFACES.
~. THE CONT~AOTO~ 5HALL, AT ALL TIMES, KEEP THE P~EMISE5 P~EE P~OM ACCUMULATION DP HASTE,, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
IO. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION (EX. NOISY OPERATIONS,
INTERRUPTIONS Of= ANY MECHANICAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL SERVICES, MATERIAL DELIVERIES AND/OR ~TORAGE) INITH THE
BUILDING DINNER OR MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE INORK.
II. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING CONDITIONS INHERE OlSTU~BBO BY NE~ ~O~ OR AS ~E~UI~EO B~ THE
PLANS. ALL EXtSTIN¢ AREAS OF THE BUILOIN~ OAMA¢EO ~Y THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ~E ~ESTO~EO TO O~I~INAL CONDITION
AT NO AD~ITIONAL DOST TO THE
LOCAL UTILI~'5 ~E~UI~EWENT5.
I¢. THE ~ENE~AL NOTE5 CONTAINE~ HB~EIN A~E PA~T OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AN~ A~ %O BE OOMPLIE~ HITH IN
14. THESE DOCUMENTS A~E IN COMPLIANCE ~ ALL OONST~UOTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE HJTH THE Fo~LOHIN~ DOPES
- 2¢¢~ INTE~ATIONAL 6UILDIN~ CODE
- 2¢~ INTE~ATIONAL ENE~T CONSErvATION CODE
* 2¢¢$ INTE~ATIONAL EXISTIN~ B~ILDIN~ CODE
- 2¢¢$ INTE~ATIONAL FI~E CODE
- 2¢¢~ INTE~ATIONAL FUEL ~A5 CODE
- 2¢¢$ INTE~ATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE
- 2¢¢~ INTE~ATIONAL PL~MBIN~ CODE
- 2¢¢~ INTE~ATIONAL ~OPERTT MAINTENANCE CODE
- 2¢¢5 INTE~ATIONAL ~51DENTIAL CODE
TIA-222-F 5TANOAR~5 "STRUCTURAL STANOA~O5 FO~ STEEL ANTENNA TO~E~S ANO 5UPPO~TIN~ ST~UOTU~S"
~INO 5PEEO OF 85 MILES/ HOURS (50 ~ILE5 /HOUR IN CONJUNCTION ~ITH O.15 INCHES OF ~AO~AL ICE).
SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION.
-~IOE FLANGE SECTIONS SHALL OON~O~H TO ASTH A-~2
-~150. ¢~EL SHALL OONFO~ TO AST~ ANT-96
-ALL STEEL PIPE5 SHALL OON~O~ TO TO ASTM ANT-BOI O~ ANT-SB, ~A~E
I~. -ALL 5HOP AND PI~LD HELDIN¢ SHALL BE DONE BY HELDE~5 ~UALIFIED A5 ~ESO~IBED IN THE "AMERICAN HEL~IN~
-BE HOT O~PPEO ~ALVANIZEO AFTE~ FABriCATION (ONLY EXPOSEO TO MOISTURE APPLICATIONS) PE~ A5~ A-12~. ALL
DAMASE5 SURFACES, HELDEO A~EA5 AND AUTHORIZED NON-~ALVANIZEO MEMBERS OR PA~TS (NEH O~ OLD) SHALL
HITH THO (2) COATS OF Z~C COLD ~ALVANIZIN~ COMPOUND MANUFACTURED ~Y A~C CHEMICAL
-ALL PiPE SIZES INOIOATEO HE~EIN A~E NOWINAL O~AMETER (INSIDE DIAMETEr.
I1. ALL NEH ANTENNA APPLICATIONS MOUNTED TO EXTE~IO~ HALLS 5HALL BE SEALED AT THE TOP ANO SLOES HITH
~O~NIN~ ~L~ S~E~ONE SEaLaNT O~ ~O~O ~U~L. THE SILICONE ~PPLI~TIONS S~LL ~ TOOLED TO
HARDHA~E TO MATCH TH~ ~XISTIN~ ADJACENT SU~AOE¢. ALL PAINT 5HALL BE 5H~IN HILL~AM& O~ APPROVED E~UAL. THE
OONT~AOTO~ SHALL NOT USE A METAL BA~EO PAINT ON THE ANTENNAS. ANTENNA~ SHALL HAVE ON~ P~IME~ COAT OF POLANE
2.~ ~LU5 FIL D~IH~5 P~IME~ IN ACCOrdANCE HITH MANUFACTURER'5 INSTRUCTION5 AN~ THEN APPLT ONE TOP COAT IN
I eENE .AL NOTES
ACCORDANCE INITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. ALL SURFACES CONTAMINATION 5HALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO PAINTING
THE NEIN SURFACES. ALL GALVANIZED SURFACES SHALL HAVE ONE COAT Of= PERMABOND BONDIN¢ AGENT, INHILE STILL INET
APPLY ONE COAT OF= SHERININ INILLIAHS FLAT LATEX PAINT, LET DRY THEN A SECOND COAT OF FLAT LATEX PAINT.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT A CONTINUOUS .4" ~NIDE SAFETY LINE, TRAFFIC YELLOIN OR APPROVED EQUAL ON THE
INALKING SURf=ACES ADJACENT TO THE NEIN CABINET TO DENOTE THE CLEARANCE LIMITS Of= THE CABINET OR SHELTER.
20. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED LEVEL AND PLUMB.
21. HATERIALS AND CONDITIONS NOT FABRICATED CORRECTLY, DAMAGED OR NON-CONFORMING SHALL BE REPORTED TO
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, A/E AND DINNER PRIOR TO ANY CORRECTIVE ACTION. ALL ACTIONS REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE
22. CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL Rt= INARNING SIGNS AT ALL ENTRY POINTS TO EQUIPMENT AREAS. THESE ARE TO INCLUDE, BUT
NOT LIMITED TO, INTERIOR FACES OF ROOF ACCESS DOORS / HATCHES. AND EXTERIOR FACES AT COMPOUND ACCESS GATES
AND EQUIPMENT ROOM DOORS. SIGNS ARE TO BE AS SPECIFIED AND SUPPLIED BY METRO PCS.
F=OUNDATI ONS
I. SOIL HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING CAPACITY OF 2,500 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. ESTIMATED BOTTOM OF FOOTING
ELEVATIONS ARE SHOP, IN ON FOUNDATION PLAN. THESE ELEVATIONS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO THE ACTUAL LEVELS Of=
-OM OF FOOTINGS 5HALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4'-O" BELOIN F=INISHED GRADE FOR FROST PROTECTION. NO
FOOTINGS SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN ~ROL.JND OR INATER. ALL f=OOTINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED F:ROM FROST, AS
4. MAXIMUM SLOPE BETINEEN BOTTOM OF ADJACENT FOOTINGS SHALL BE ONE 0) VERTICAL TO (2) HORIZONTAL. ALL
FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY BRACED TO INITHSTANI2 BACK FILLING, EARTH PRESSURE, AND
CONSTRUCTION LOADS UNTIL ALL E<2UIPMENT ARE INSTALLED PER THE CONSTRUCTION DRAININGS.
I. CONCRETE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE P41TH REQUIREMENTS OF TH~ A~ERIOAN
CONCRETE INSTITUTE (AOI) DWILDIN~ ~ODE FO~ ~EINFO~OED CONCRETE, LATEST AMENDMENTS.
2. THE MATEt~,IAL SHALL CONFORH TO THE f=OLLOINING STANDARDS AND REQUIREMIENTS (LATEST EDITIONS)~
PORTLAND CEMENT
READY MIX CONCRETE
CONCRETE AGGREGATE
DEFORMED BILLET STEEL BAR
ASTM 0150
ASTM C~4 ¢ ACI-~OI
ASTM CBB
ASTM AI85
3. PORTLAND CEHENT SHALL BE TYPE IA.
4. CEMENT SHALL DEVELOP A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (F'C.) OF 3000 PSI AFTER, 28 DAYS AND HAVE A MINIMUM SLUMP
DP S INCHES, AND A MAXIMUM Of= S INCHES.
5. PROPORTIONING OF: THE CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE BY THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY METHOD.
VIBRATORS SHALL HAVE A MINIHUM FREQUENCY Of= qOOO RPM.
.7. MINIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE SHALL BE 3/4" INCH.
CONCRETE SHALL BE STONE CONCRETE HAVING AN ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF S,OOO PSI AT 2S DAYS INITH A MINIMUM
'FOR ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE S" MINIMUM AND E" MAXIMUM
CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE P41TH A.&I. CODE.
IO. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE TO ACCOMMODATE
ANY AND ALL PENETRATIONS F=OR ARCHITECTURAL, STRUOTU~L, MECHANICAL ,$ ELECTRICAL DRAININGS.
II. ALL REINF:ORCING BARS SHALL BE DEFORMED BARS OF NEIN BILLET STEEL CONFORMING TO ASTM SPEC A615, GRADE
60, COLD DRAINN INIRE F:OR INELDED INIRE MESH SHALL CONF=ORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF "SPECS FOR COLD DRAINN
OR CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT" (ASTM A82--I0), OR "SPEC FOR YIELDED STEEL INI'R~ f=ABRIC FOR CONCRETE
REINFORCEMENT, (ASTM AISB-'-rO). REINF:ORCING SHALL BE SECURELY TIED TO PREVENT DISLOCATION AND PER THE
DETAILING MANUAL.
12. ALL BARS HARKED CONTINUOUS (CONT.) SHALL BE LAPPED 40 X BAR DIAMETER, AT SPLICES AND CORNERS AND
HOOF, ED AT NON-CONTINUOUS ENDS. LAP TOP BARS AT CENTER BETINEEN SUPPORTS AND LAP CONTINUOUS BOTTOM
BARS AT SUPPORTS.
13. ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE THOROUSHLY CLEANED, INERRED AND SLUSHED INITH CEMENT GROUT JUST
BEFORE PLACING NE~ CONCRETE. THE CONCRETE AND MASONRY CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL (OR GIVE OTHER
TRADES AMPLE OPPORTUNI'FW' TO INSTALL) ALL ANCHOR BOLTS, PLATES, SLOTS, CHASES, NAILERS, INSERTS, SLEEVES,
ETC. AS REC2UIRED BY OTHER TRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIf=Y ALL DI1vfENLSIONS BEF:ORE 5ETTIN~ 50~EEO5
AND FO~MS.
1.4.. PROVIDE MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCIN~ BAR5 A5 f=OLLOINS, EXPOSED TO GRADE FOOTING5 (3'%
INTERIOR FACES OF INALLS (I % EXTERIOR F:ACES Of= Y',IALLS (I-I/'m"), SLAB TOP AND BOTTOM BARS (3/4"), BEAMS (I-I/2"),
SLAB ON GROUND BOTTOM (3"), COLUMNS, AND PA~S AND (2") TO VERTICAL BARS.
15. INHEREVER CONCRETE SURFACES ABUT OR ARE VENEERED INITH MASONRY, PROV'IDE VERTICAL DOVETAIL INSERTS
FOR HASONRY ANCHORS SPACED AT 2'-0" O.& MAXIMUM.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A NON-SLIP BROOM FINISH IMMEDIATELY AF=TER THE TROINEL FINISHING PHASE.
1'7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS IN O'F~Z~ER TO PROTECT THE CONCRETE f=ROM
PREMATURE CURING AS SOON AS THE f=ORMS ARE REMOVED, ESPECIALLY DURING THE FIRST 24 HOURS.
F=ILL
I. ALL FILL UNDER CONCRETE SLABS TO BE '::IS% COMPACTED EARTH, INELL TAMPED AND 4" COMPACTED CRUSHED
GRAVEL. ALL BACK FILL MATE~AL SHALL BE ~EE OF AN~ O~ANIO MATT~.
I C. ONO .ETE
2. SPECIFIC, ATIONS (IF= EQUI E )
ESI N
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
P. O. BOX 3
HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730
TEL: 732.888.6210
FAX: 732.847.4335
LouMoglino, AIA
ARCHITECT
NJ-~AI13345
NY-~ 028992-1
Robert W. Toms, P.E.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
NJ-#GE 36209
NY-~ 075384
CT - # 22375
PA -~ 061412
SEAL
metroPCS
New York, LLC
5 SKYLINE DRIVE
HAWTHORNE, NY t 0532
51TE JOB : N'r'- SI2
OqMPSTSOII
SITE I NFOt ,h'1ATI ON
OUN1:2 AVF:NUE
lViATT] TUGF---, N'r'
~ESI®N T'dPE:
CO-LOOATION
E Ho 06/02/0q
SHEET TITLE
®F:. NFt~-.A I
SHEET NUMBEt~.
- BOUNDAf~,¥ INFORMATION IS TAKEN Ft~,OM THE ~ N ~ = PROPOSED ELEC~I6 F~N NTH HETE~ ~ DISGONNE6T
- t~ D E S I G Nu
~{ = EXISTIN6 050 CABINET p~
5ROUP, INO, ATAClTEVIClTON04-14-O~ _~7% %%%~. ~ / ~?,Q ~?~ / E N G I N E [ R I N G
/"N ¢.~ /? ? .¢'~'¢~ ~:~ NOTE, ~ZLET, NEWJERSEY 0.30
~0~ N~ N ~ //. INSTALLATION 15 IN OOMPLIANGE nlrH: TEL: 732.888.6210
x, ~// x~,~, ~ ,:~,Y / ~.~ 'e~ o-./ 2~ ~ LouMogl~o,A~ Rob~tW. Toms, P.E.
E XICTIN~ BUILDIN¢ (TYP.) ~ ~ . ~5 ~ N ~W /'* ~'," / ~ ~CHITECT STRUC~ ENGINEER
~ ~/ N ~ ~Z~; /N' ~ / NJ-2AI13345 NJ - g GE 36209
~ ~/ ~ ~ -%;,~.: , ~ / ~-~028992-1 ~' ~075384
~. ~ / ~, ~ CT-~22375
P~OPOCE~ M~O P~5 E~UIPMENT / ~~/~*~ X '~- LOT/'
5~EL ~AIL5 ANCHORED TO NTH ~~~ //-x Oql2Woq ~ICEOPERCLIENTOON~NT5BHo des
50NO~ 5LAB (180 $~ ~T ¢
~e~e~ O~/OI/Oc(EVJ~D PER CLIENT 60~NT5
~ ' *~e TAX
e ~o LOT
New Yo , LLC
~ 0 SITE INFORMATION
EXlSTINS ~U~INe (TYP.)I2~8~ $OUN~ AVENU~
~Ho ~ o~1o~/o~
~ :: ~o~°:
I" = BC' I 24x~8 5GALE: I" = 70'
Ilxl%
$OALE,
I
DIS('ONNECT
(~= PROPOSED TELO0 PROM EXISTIN~ DOUBLE ~ATE
0S00A ,NETTONE E U,PMENT D E S I G N
~( /~"~ ~li~'''~ ~// ;~"~ ~~ ~.. ~~. '~ / ~ /[~, ~N~N ARCHITECTURE E N G I N E E R I N G
PROPOSED METRO PCS PTC ' ,, / P.O. BOX 3
CABINET 5ECU~D TO PROPOSED , ~ZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730
OONC~ 5LA~ ON ONIST~T 'x
F~HE MOUNTED TO eALVANIZED I / TEL: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 2 1 0
POSTS ~ITH ~ORK LleHT ABOVE ~"
~/ F~: 732.847.4335
(SEE ~ETAIL I/A-5) ~~ ~NN N~ Nf// /~~~~~~~ ~~ EXSTIN¢6'-O"PENOE~~.' ,:~' 7 ~~ ~ ,,;¢~;2- EXISTIN¢ TRANSFORME~ -- ........ ~ ___ I ~/~ ;','"' ~CH~ECT ~ NJ Lo~ Mo¢o, AIA Robert W. To~s, P.E. _. ~ A1028992413345 PA- ¢ 061412 CT ~ NJ STRUCTU~L ENGI~ER..' ~¢ GE 2237507538436209
~ ~ ~ ' .' ~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSE~ METRO P~5 I0 -0 x I~ -0 ;:
12/21/Oq
55UED
FILIN~
PROPOSED 10'-12' HICH (MIN.) ~ : ~ ~ ~ O~/Uq/Oq EVSEDEROLIENTSOHHENT5 BHo des
E~Re~EN LANDSCAPE / ~ ° ::
5OREENIN~ AROUND EXISTIN5 -, ,x ~ Ob/25/oq ~YISED PER OLIENT 60MHENT5
COMPOUND "
% % ~% N / / ~ ': .' /" : '; " ~ PER 5EOTOR, ~ TOTAL) MOUNTED OUTSIDE %
¢~',,~" ,,,,' ~ ~ ~ _~ EXISTINe POLE (SEE OETA L 2/A-~) --
;: '; ~ ;~' ~ ~ ~ PROPOSE~ METRO PCS E~UIPMENT CABINETS
~~ / I~' r~ 7 ~%'7~7 ',,~_ ~ ~IL5 ANCHORED TO NE~ CONC~ 5LAB
j ~ ~ HA~HORNE, NY 10532
~r~ ~o~, N~I2
SITE INFORMATION
EXISTINO EOUIPMENT
OTHERS) / m~ ~ ~ 5AMMA u,, ~ .~- - I~ SOUND AVENUE
5EOTO~ ~SI~N TYPE:
CO-LOOATION
Ilxlq SCALE: ~/16"=1'-0" I 24xB6 SCALE:
NOTE=
~ PROPOSED YALMONT-
A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE EXISTIN~ MONOPOLE
~A5 P~RFO~ME~ IN CONFORMANCE ~ITH TIA~IA-222
~V F AND NY 5TA~ BUILPlN~ CODE5 ON 08.11.0~ BY ~ ~ DI83a (OR APPRO~D E~UAL)
5ENAAN EN¢INEE*IN¢ ,OLUTION,, LLO. THE ANALYSI5 GROUP5
CONCLUDED T~AT THE MONOPOLE 15 5TR~OT~LLY
OAPABLE OF 5UPPORTIN~ THE ~XISTIN~ AND PROPOSED a R C H I T E C T U R E
~ ENGINEERING
ANTENNAS. [ P.O. BOX 3
¢:'~ '~~~Q~;~,~ ~¢.:~~_ =) TEL:F~:~ZEET'NEWJERSEY07730732.888.6210732.847.4335
~~> ~~~ [ ~ ~' Lou Mo~o. AIA Robe= W. Toms. P.E.
% ~ NJ - ¢AI 13345 NJ - ¢ GE 36209
( ~ 5¢~~ ~-~028992-1 ~-,075384
~ , CT - ¢ 22375
t¢¢} /~~ ,, pa- ~ 061412
TOP OF EX[STINO POLE /
I00'-0"~
ABOVE
~RA~E
/'5
_Y~LS- / ~ / HOUNDS OUTSIDE EXISTIN~ POLE , %~ ~ ~
~OIO~ / ~ (SEE ~F-I FO~ ANTENNA ~ODEL ~ '~ _~
98/25/0~
~VISED PE~ ¢LENT ~MMENE
MT~
/ r
~ 2~A~N~H~.
C~N~ OF P~OP. METRO P~5 ANTENNA5 ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~AL
PROPOSED ME~O PC5 AN~NNA (~P OF I ~
PER ~EOTOR, ~ TOTAL) HOUNDS
EXISTIN¢ POLE (SEE DETAIL 2/A-B)
I
IANTENNA MOUNT ~ETAIL r,~* =OOUM~NT
PROPOSED METRO PO5 ¢P5 IxJ7 5GALE: 3/4" = ILO'' 24x~0 5GALE: I I/2" ILO"
UNIT ON PROPOSED CABLE CONSENT OF THE OREATOR
EXISTIN5 OSO 6ADJNE,-- ' rrll~' :rcJ
NOTE: ~
New Yo , LLC
PROPOSE~ ~TRO PO5 ~OAXIAL ~INFORCED ~ITN ~ELDED ~lM5 THAT
CABLE5 ROUND ALONe NE~ CABLE ~ PROPOSED ME~O PC5 ARE COMPATIBLE PITH THE POLE. 5 S~LINE
BRIOeE TO EXISTIN¢ POLE (USE ~ COAX[AL O~LE5 ROUTED CONT~CTOR TO COO~INATE ~ITN ~ HA~HORNE, NY 10532
EXISTIN~ PO~T) (SEE DETAIL I-4/A-4) ~ ~ UP ~N EXiSTIN~ POL~ (USE POLE MANUFACTU~R.
EXISTIN5 PORT)~ 51TE Jo~.:N~I2
P~OPO~EP METRO PO~ E~UIPMENT ~
CABINETS (~P. OF 4) HOUN~Q ON STEEL ~~-~%' ~T~ UO~= O~T~OII
RAIL5 ANCHORS TO NE~ CONCRETE ~ ~ HAND-HOLE RI~ FOR TOP OF POLE ~IT~ I~O~ATI
(DY OTHERS)
~OPO5EO HErO PCS PTC CABINET ~
SECURED TO PROPOSED OONC~TE SLAB
ON UNIS~UT FRAME MOUNTED TO ~ 125~5 ~OUN~ AV~NU~
DALVANIZED POSTS ~ITH ~0~ LI6HT ~ EXISTIN6 &'-O" H~6H ~TTI TU~,
ABOVE (SEE DETAIL I/A-5) ~ ~ FENC~ , /
TOP OF PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ J-HO~5 FOR 5U~ORTIN~ COAX ~510N
E~Ui~MENT GABINET5 J ~ N N TOP OF P~OPOSED ~ = / LINE5
BASE OF POLE DHo SSI O6/O2/Oq
~RADE~
APPROXIMATE
~oPos== memo ~cs ~o'-o" x ~o'-o" ~~~ ¢ ~ANO-~OLE ~1~ ~ONOPOL~ ~L~WATION
CONCRETE SLAB (ISO 5G FT TOTAL LEASE
A~A) (SEE =~AHIN~ A-e)' [ -P~OPOSEO 12' HISH (HrsJ g ANTENNA MOUNT
E~RSREEN LANDSCAPE
5C~ENIN5 AROUND EXISTIN~
COMPOUND MICROFLECT MODEL ~1~ ~H~T NU~ ~V,
HAND-MOLE
I/8" = ILO'' 124xD6 SCALE: [/4" = I'-0" Ilxl~ SCALE: I/8" = I'-0" ~4xD& SCALE: ~/4" = ['-0"
Ilxl~
SCALE:
HxI~
SCALE:
I/D"=l'-O"
ON PROPOSED GABLE BRID~E
SEE ETA,L=/A-,) D E S I G N U
~, I ]~" I 8-0 ON OEN~R MAXIMUM ~ A R C H I T E C T U R E
~ ]~,_1~ ~ E N G I N E E R I N G
I ~ ;~GOAXIAL GABLE5 ~OUTED ~' P.O. BOX 3
I~ ~ ...... ' I ALON~ GABLE BRID~E~ ~
~ ' ~TIN~ ON ~A~EZE HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 0~30
k~ ~ ) MAN~ (~ ~TAI~ 2/A-4) TEL: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 2 1 0
~ I Ill ~O~T, AT 6LO" ~OPOS~D VALMONT ~~ ~~ H~-I~ ~YS~M (SEE MANUFAG~R'5 Lou Mo~no, A~ Robert W. Toms, P.E.
~ ~P~IFI~AT~ON~ FO~ INSTALLATION ~CHITECT STRUCTU~ ENGINEER
Y MAXIMUM ON CENTER GABLE BRIDCE ASSEMBLY ~ r ~ PROOE~URE) (~PIGAL OF 4 ~R PLA~) NJ- ¢ A113345 NJ - ~ GE 36209
= o~ APPROVE~ E~UAL. ~ ~ i- -
MANUFAGTU~R5 ~ ~ ~ % ~ - ¢ 075384
, n x ~- ~ 028992-1 CT- ~ 22375
~ - ~ ~~ ~GOAX[AL ~ABLE5 ROUTED UP OABkE 5~OIFI~ATION5 FOR
II ~ BRIP~E POST ON VAkMONT DOUBLE INSTALLATION CdlDELINE5 % ~ ~ - ~ ' ~ I/2"¢ ~EP HOLE PA - ~ 061412
~ HANeER ASSEMBLY OR
APPROVED E~UAL ¢ ~'-0" 12/10/0~ REVI~D PER OLIENT OOH~NT5 des
ON OENTER 4 '- ~ ~ PROVIDE NON-SHRINK CROdT e
'f?]'"~ ~ ¢ A~ BASE PLATE Oq/2~/oq EVISDDPEKOLIENT~H~NT5 BHo
50HEDULE 40 PIPE ,:,, , ,, %- , ', ',2 ,
~ ~:~{;~ '.' .' ~ I'-0"¢ OONORE~ FOOTIN¢ (SEE DETAIL5 HAN~ER ~[TH STANDARD
~ ;'.~,,~ '.~j-~c?~ / PROPOSED ~ THI~K LATER
,.~
New Yo , LLC
5 S~LINE DRIVE
HA~HORNE, NY 10532
s~T~ ~o~, N~qSI2
~T~ ~o~, O~PSTSOI I
PROPOSEO GONORE~ SLAB SITE INFORMATION
'~ ~ ¢ 8"x¢"xl/2" BASE PLATE
PROPOSE~ OOAXIAL OABLE5 12~ ~OUN~
e- ~ / (~PIOAL) 5ECU~D TO
-- ~ P~POSEP ~ I/2"¢ SCHEDULE 40 OABLE BRI~eE OABLE B~IOeE DOUBLE T-LINE BRAC~T MATT~ TUO~, N~ I I
i ~ ~ ~ SUPPORT POST ~LPE~ ONTO ¢"x~"xl/2" BASE SUPPORT POST , ?~ ~ITH 5TANPA~ 5NAP-IN
! ~ PLA~ (~PIOAL OF 2) (SEE ~ETAIL I/A-4) ~ OLIP5
~ ~, ' ~ P~OPOSED OOAXIAL CABLE$ :
5TANDA~ SNAP-IN CLIP5 ~ - P~OPOSEO VALHONT DOUBLE
-- ~ CABLE B~IDCE ~ -, ~ - ~ - ~ - T-LINE B~GKET OR
~ PROPOSED VAL~ONT DOUBLE , 3'-0" ON CEN~R (AS
5" ~/2"¢ ANCHO~ 5ET 4 I/4" INTO HILTI-HIT HY-150 (SEE DETAIL I/A-4) T-LINE BRACKET OR ~,'; J l~ I
I ~ 7 - - 5YS~H (SEE HANUFAOTURER'5 A~ROVED EGUAL 5PACED ~
, ~,, ~ 8" SPECIFICATION5 FOR INSTALLATION ~'-0" ON OEN~R (AS
HIM. PROCEDURE) (~PIOAL OF 4 PER PLATE) REGUI~O) SHEET TI TLR
GADLE ~OUTI N5
SHEET NU~BE~
Ilxlq 5OALE: ~/4":1'-0" 24xB¢ 5OALE: I I/2":1'-0" Ilxlq 5GALE:N.T.5, 24x~8 50ALE: N.T.5. ilxlq 50ALE:N.T.5. 24x~8 50A~E:
~OTES~
I. ALI MATERIAL TO BE HOT-PIPPED ~ALVANIZEP
?. SEDURE E~2UIPMENT TO LINISTRUT BRAGKET~ UTILIZIN~ ~NI~T
GHANNEL NUT~.
~. EQUI~ENT SHALL ~E ~OUNTED TO UNI~TRUT F~AHE A~
~OVE~NIN~ DOPE ~E~UJREMENTS.
(HELD ALL AROUND)
('FYPIGAL OF 2)
PROPOSED LTTHONIA I¢)¢LU LAMP
(TO BE OPERATED ON A &O MINUTE TIMER)
ZED UNIST~UT PLO00
(TYPIGAL) ~2UANTITY AND LOGATION
AS REQUIRED TO MOUNT Ed~UlPMENT
U-BOLT ("FYPIDAL OF 2 PEP-,
UNIS"FRUT)
-- PP, OPOSEP PTD GAD. INET ON
SUPPORT POSTS
PROPOSED 2 I/2" NOMINAL
DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PIPE Y, IITH
GAP ("DFPICAL OF 2)
/2" BASE PLATE H/(4) I/2"4~ HILTI
HIT H¥-150 tN/4 I/4" EMBEPI"iENT INTO
GONGt~,ETE 5LAB (SEE DETAIL 4/A-4)
SIDE ELEVATION
211
211
FRONT ELEVATION
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
P. O. BOX3
HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730
TEL: 732.888.6210
FAX: 732.847.4335
LouMoglino, AIA
ARCHITECT
NJ-~AI13345
NY-# 028992-1
Robert W. Toms, P.E.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
NJ - ¢~ GE 36209
NY - # O75384
CT - ~ 22375
PA - # 061412
12/21/0q 5SUED FOR FILING
12/10/0~
~AL
metroPCS
New York, LLC
i I
UTILITY MOUNT i:?tETAIL
5 SKYLINE DRIVE
Ilxl~ 5C, ALt=:I/2"= I '-0''
j 24xB& DOALE: D/4"= I'-0"
HAWTHORNE, NY 10532
NOTES=
I. THE ELEVATION AND LOGATION OF THE GPS ANTENNA 5HALL BE IN AGG, OI~,DANGE HITH THE FINAL ~-,F REPORT.
2. THE GPS ANTENNA MOUNT IS DESIGNED TO 'FASTEN TO A STANDAP, P I-I/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER, SOHEDULE 4-0, GALVANIZED STEEL OR
STAINLESS STEEL PIPE. THE PIPE MtJST NOT BE THREADED AT THE ANTENNA MOUNT END. THE PIPE SHALL BE GUT TO THE ~OUIRED LENGTH
(MINIMUM OF I,D INGHE5) USIND A HAND OR ROTA'P-¥ PIPE GUTTER TO ADDURE A 5MOOTH AND PERPENDIGULA~ GUT. A HAGKC 5AFl 5HALL NOT BE
USED. THE GUT PIPE END SHALL BE PEBURREP AND SMOOTH IN O~ER TO SEAL AGAINST THE NEOPRENE ~ASKET ATTAGHE!D TO THE ANTENNA
MOUNT.
S. THE MOUNTIN~ PLATE SHALL BE FABRIGATED AS 5HOHN AND ATTAGHEP TO THE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT 5TT~JJGTURE USING U-BOLTS. THE
SUPPORT PIPE 5HALL THEN BE ATTAGHED TO THE MOLINTIN¢ PLATE USING THE OVERSIZE U-BOLT5 PROVIDED TO ALLOH ADJUSTMENT. IT 15
GRITIGAL THAT THE ~PD ANTENNA 15 MOUNTED 5UGH THAT IT IS F'IITHIN 2 DEGREES OF VERTIGAL AND THE BASE OF THE ANTENNA 15 AITHIN 2
DE~REES OF LEVEL.
'1/16" x 2-'~/¢I' SLOTTED~MOUNTIN~
tB~AC,.KET
PLATE
HOLE FOR S I/2" NOMINAL
DIAMETER SGHEDULE 40
PIPE, U-BOLT HITH DOUBLE
NUTS AND ~IASHERS. (TYP,)
] ®F::'S IvFOUNTIN®
.2
J
gETAIL
I" #2 A~¢ I
,', (TYP 2 PLGS)
--WI&" x '//~" SLOl i~ HOLE
FOR I-I/4" NOMINAL
DIAMETER PiPE
NOTE:
OVE~,SIZE U-BOLT PROVIDED TO
ALLOH +/- 2" TILT/ADJUSTPiENT TO
ADHIEVE TOLERANGE.
MOUNTIN8
BRACKET
PLATE
PROPOSED --
GABLE BRIDGE
SUPPORT POET
2 HOLE LUG
GleBE GROUND
ANTENNA
(SUPPLIED BY LUGENT)
:,ABLE TO PIPE DONNEGTO~',
BURNDY TYPE DAR ("PrP 2 PLCS)
· HOLES FOR ADJUSTMENT
KiT
GOAX GABLE MINIMUM BENDIN5
"~.ADIUS PER MANUFAGTUREF'.'S STANDARD
*~& A~ ~ROUNDIN~ KIT GABLE
(P~OVIDED ~ITH KIT)
To MIOB
ITEM~*
DILL OF MATERIALS
PEB~t~.I PT ION
M/4" NOMINAL PlAMETDR ~ch, 40 x 18" LE. MIN SS OR 5ALV. PIPE
~UANTIT¥
(¢~¢h)
(~) PLATE I/4 x 4-1/4 x 1&-1/4" L~. DALV,(A-D&) J
(~) STD. U-BOLT FOR ~ I/2" NOMINAL PlAMETE~ SGHEOULE.4O PIPE 2
~ DOUBLE HEX NUT5 AND ~ASHER, ~V.
STD. U-BOLT FO~ I I/4"' NOMINAL DIAM~T~ PIPE ~ DOUBLE HEX
~ NUT5 AND ~EHER, 5ALV. (DEE NOTE D) 2
~ITE ..JOEl'S, N¥TDI2
MTM JO~,:~, OqM'P~T~OI I
~ITE I NFO~.i'dATI ON
MATTI TUOK, N"¢
~oUN~ AVENUE
DESI®N TYPE:
C,O-LOC, ATION
06/02/0q
ELEVATION~
]::DF:TAIL
~.EV.
Ilxl'-t DOALE: I I/2"=1'-0" 24xD& DC, ALE:
_, , ~ $/IS"4~ x 2" SLOTTED , ,
' D E S I G N
¢ GROUP5
~ ,. ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ t I I I I ~ ~E AR OF CAE INET~
I ~ ~ I W~xI~ I I 7 J I I ~1~ -- -
~ !1 I I I I~ I - i ARCHITECTURE
I PROPOSED I x PROPOSED PROPOSED pROPOSED : ~ ~ k ~
~ I MOOCELL ~ ~ I I MODCELL ~ ~ ~ATTERT I ~ I ~ATTERT I ~ ,N,~,', ,,,,', ,'x, . ', ,-Jx N', ,',, , ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ~-- ---- '
~ I ~ 'T ~ .... * I I * * ~ I .... I ........ I T MODCELL ~ MODCELL ~ATTERT ~ BATTERT --Z TEL: 7 3 2 8 8 8 6 2 1 0
T ' I j /7 l__J L ...... 3 L J = " ~xl~ " ' '
F~: 732.847.4335
I I I I ~ 4L~'' ~ 'i d~,.~
L ....... ~ I J / (WP.) / ~ - ~~-~ '~ ~'~-%"~' ~ "-' -~ ~ ............................ Lou Mo~no, AIA Robe~ W. Toms, P.E.
,;'-~j~ ~b c://' ~ : ~CHITECT S~UCTU~LENGI~ER
~ ~* '/ // ~~ '7'" II ....... ,I ,, NJ-~AI13345 NJ-~GE36209
k ,/ /z, . t , ~-~028992-1 ~' ~075384
/ //, ., ,'/ ' CT-~22375
,k ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ PA - ~ 061412
I
I/4~ ~ /~~ N ~ 1/2"~ NILTI MIT MT-15~/
4 STAOOE~ ~OLT5 AT // ' ' . DETAIL
A
NOTES:
PA~
[. TOP ~ STEEL ELEVATION ~"+/- A~O~E GEADE LEAL. D~TAIL
2. FOR MOUNTIN~ MOLE LOCATION5 SEE DETAIL 21A-~. ~ 0D/25/0q ~ISEP PERCLIBTCOMMENT5
Ilxl~ ~AL~: ~/~"=1'-0" I 24x~6 S~AL~: ~/4"=1'-0" Ixl% S~ALE: ~/8"=1'-0" 24x~ S~ALE: 3/4"=1'-0"
PROPO~EO 8" THIGK 4000 P~I 60NG~ETE SLAB HITH~ L4x4xl/4 (~ETOND) EXI~TIN~
2 LAYER~ OF 6x6-8/5 ~LDED HI~E FABRIC. SEE ~ (TTP.) ~ ~ STEEL TO ~E PLUM~
PLAN5 FOR PAD 5~ZE (TOP TO BE LISHTLY BRUSHED) N ~ (TTP.) ~~ ~ AND LEAL, 51~~~ ~EAL
,.. New LLC
EXISTIN~ UNDIS~RDED ~ EMBEDMENT. 5T~E~ ~OLT5 AT ~ P~TAIL ~/A-~)
viRel~ 5oil ~'-o" ac. EAC~ 5lPE ¢ ~EB 5 S~LINE DRIVE
~ ~ ~ETAIL 4 ~ ~ETAIL 5I :p~TAIL HA~HORNE, NY 10532
- - SIT~ JO~, N~q512
MT~
~ITE INFORMATION
IIIlllllll
12565 ~OUN~ AVENUE
~ATTI TU~, N~
~ ~ ~i~N T~:
~l~ll~l~l~ [r:l~
- L --- '~ ~ ~O-LO~AT~ON
~A~INET ~A~INET CA~INET CA~[NET
~ ~/ TOP ~ CONC~NT~ PAP ~Ho ~$ 0~/02/0~
' ' ~ ~'-4"+/- AmL MA,X.
TITL~
FINISH
G~DE
DETAILOONC~TEI¢"S"xI¢"¢"x¢"B/A-8)PAD (sEETHICK ~ ~ CHEET NUMade REV.:
I/4"=1'-0" 124xB8 5OALE, I/2"=1'-0"
Ilxl~
I
~ [~EAR OF CADINET5
2l~ I ~ I I I I ~ I
J I MODG~kL ~ I I MODG~Bk I I BATTerY ~ I BATTERY
-- I ~ I I ~xl~ I I ~ I
~' ~ ~ .... ~ I I ~ ~ N I .... I ........
~ I ~ ~ 1--J L ...... 3 L
I I I I
/~~ ~ ENGINEERING
~ E ARCHITECTURE
~ P.O. BOX 3
- B x~~~. ~ HAZ[ET, NEW JERSeY 07730
TEE: 732 888 6210
, IIii I' ? ARCHITEcTLO~ Mo~no, A~ S~UCTu~LR°bert W. TomS,ENGi~ERP.E.
) 2'-II ~/b"2 ~ ---- ]~ ~ NJ-~MI3345NJ - g GE 36209
'r xLAT~ 1~/16~ 2'-4 I~" ~-~028992-1 ~-~075384
~ ~'-I I~/1~'''~ I~/1~' ..... LOA~N~ PA-~061412
~ oq/2q/°q RNIEE~ PER CLIENT
~FOI CONVENIENCE OUTL ~ Ob/25/oq ~VISEO PER CLIENT COMME~5
0 ET
~Ts
L ~ [~ ~ ,2 POSITION ~RHINAL BLOCK (OPTIONAL) ~ O,/OI/Oq R~IEEDPERGLIENT OOHHE~5
u ~ MOUNTIN~ T~MPLATE Il ~ ~v. ~ATE ~EEORIPTION
~ ¢ L ~RCE 50PP~5510N (OPTIONAL) SEAL
5EO~ NE~ METRO P~5 E~IPMENT OABINET /
TO NE~ 5~EL DUNNACE AC
~IND 5TOP
HA~FAD~RER5 5PE¢IFIG,,ATION5 (~P.) ***NOT TO 5¢ AL E*** MOLTIPOINT ~ROUND BAR 1~~
IIxI7 5OALE: I/4"=1'-0" 24x5¢ 5GALE: I/2"=1' 0"
,~, ~ ~,;,o~**~,~,-,.**~ ~:,,: ,.* ~. ~=. New Yo~ LLC
A~A FO~ (I) BA~E~Y CABINET - 2~.5q" x 2b.14" = 5.11 5~. FT.
4'-4"
AREA FOR (I) PT& OABINET- BO" x 12" = 2,5 ~. FT. ) 2'-e" 2 , 2 5 S~LINE DRIVE
, , HA~HORNE~ NY 10532
TOTAL A~EA OF O~N~T5 - ~.bT + 5XI' + 2.D~ = I&.Ob ~. FT. 0
L -' -' ..~,~ ~,~ Joe*
PLAN ~ FTC ~X / m ~ITE INfOrMATION
a/lO"/4
, 2'-& q/l&" / 2'-4 q/l~" 4 D~1'-~ ?' ~
~ 2'-4 q/l~" ,'
.... ~ MATTITUCK, N% 11~52
~ ~ ~ =x IMOUNTINO BRAOKET TEMPLATE CO-LOCATION
- /
~ ~ ', ,, ~ NE~ PO~R ~LCO CABINET (FTC) . ~ ~RA~N D~: OHE~KE~ ~: 2ATE:
__--- '~_ HOUNTINO ~MPLA~ ~HO 555 06~02~Gq
~ ~H~T TITL~
~ 5EOU~
PLAN ¢ DA~RY CABINET METRO PGe ~C CABINET TO NE~ UNISTRUT
FRAME AB PER MANUFAC~RE~5
5PEOIFIOATION5 EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
ELEVATION
IlxlW 5GALE: I/4"=1'-0" 124xDb 5GALE: I/2"=1'-0" Jlxl7 SCALE: I/4"=1'-0" ~24xEb SCALE: I/2"=1'-0"
ANTENNA SCHEDULE
SECTOt~, ~,X/TX FdANUPAE, TU~,E~, ~OD~L~ ~ADLE L~N~TH DIA. LABEL
~DT ~o E~T ~X/TX' KATH~N - ~00-10504 ~X BO FT.~ ~/~" I
~DT D~ EDT ~X/TX TX BO FT.~ ~/~" 2
~T D~ EDT ~X/TX ~X lDO ~T.~ ~/~" ~ ~E~
HOT 0~ ED% ~X/TX KATH~EIN - 800-10504 RX BO ~T.~ ~/8" I ~LUE
~OT 0° EOT ~X/TX TX lDO FT.~ ~/8" 2 BLUE
~OT 0~ EOF ~X/TX ~X BO FT.~ ~/8" B BLUE
HOT 0° EOT ~X/TX TX I~0 PT.~ ~/¢" 4 BLUE
~OT 0~ EO~ ~X/TX KATHREIN - 800-10504
~OT 0° ED~ ~X/TX TX I~0 PT.~ ~/~"
NOT 0~ ED1 ~X/TX ~X
HOT 0° ~O~ ~X/TX TX I~0 FT.~ ~/8" 4
p~OPOSED 'ODMA' PANEL ANTENNA:
KATFIP, EIN MODEL NO. ~OO-IO504
)'2
~=t~ONT ¥1EUJ
51DE vIE~
BILL O~= MATE~,IALS
,40.~"P¢. ~E~C~IPTION HANUFAGTdRER
I 2 HODGELL .UGENT
2 2 EZBFO BATTERY GABINET .UGENT
B 1560" ATO"fSJSO "//8"¢ AIRCELL GOAXIAL GABLE5 "~ILOSY GOHHt. JNIOATIONS,/NC.,
4 24- DFAO"I850 '718"~ '~/16 DIN (F) C. ONNEC, TOR 'RILOGY GoHHUNIGATIONS, INC-.,
5 24 5K-818A¢.., 1/8" 5ROUND KIT T~IL05Y GONHUNIGATIONS, INd,
8 24- GS-UI218 '//8" HEATHERPROOFIN¢ KEY TRILOOY C, OHHUNIGATIONS, lNG,
'1 ATI58JSO I 5/8"~ AIRGELL COAXIAL GABLE5 "~,ILOGY C, OHHUNIGATIONS, lNG
8 DFAI5850 15/8"¢ '-//l& DiN (F) GONNEGTOR "~ILO~Y GOHHUNIGATIONS, ]NC,
,::f 5K-8158AG I 5/8" 5ROUN~ KIT 'I"~ILOSY ¢..,OHHUNIOATIONS,
lO GS-UI258 I 5/8" HEATHERPROOFING KIT "~ILOSY GOHHUNIC, ATIONS, INC..,
Il 24 8' JAUOI2DHDH8 I/2"e JUHPER 1/16 DIN (H) GONNEGTOR5 T~ILOSY OONHUNIGATIONS, INO
12 ~ REHOTE ELEGTRIGAL TILT ~,ATHREIN
iD ~, ANTENNA - HODEL ~ KATHREIN - 800-i0504 KATHREIN
14
ANTENNA CABLIN® NOTES
I. COLORED ELE(,TRIGAL TAPE SHALL HARK EAGH
END OF EVERY GABLE AS GLOBE TO EAGH END A5
PO551BLE.
2. IN ADDITION TO TAPE HARK, lNG5, EAC, H END OF
EVERY CABLE SHALL ALSO BE LABELED HITH BRASS
TAGS (SUPPLIED BY OrtNER) INSGRIBED HITH NUHBER
AND OOLOR OF TAPE NAR~IN¢5 A5 INDICATED IN
TH~ ADO~ 5OHEHATI& THIS 5YS~H 15 TO BE USED
FOR ALL COLORS.
~. AL~ TAPE HA~KIN¢5 ~O~LD BE DONE IN
5E~OENOE FROH THE NORTH ~O~IN~ OLOGKHISE A5
5HOHN IN THE 5GHEHATIO AEOn.
4. THE GON~AOTO~ ~HALL INSTALL ANTENNA AND
J~HPER GABLE5 HITH DRIP LOOP5 TO P~NT
dNDESI~BLE ~R RUN-OFF.
5. THE GONT~OTOR 5H~L INSTALL APDITIONA~
GABLE 5~PPORT5 A5 NEEDE~ TO NAINTAIN A HINIHdH
5PAGING OF 9'-0" ON GEN~R.
~. OONT~OTO~ HILL ~O0~ THE LOCATION AND
SERIAL NUHBER5 OF ALL AN~NNAS, ANTENNA
GONTROLLE~ HOTORS, AND THEIR OOR~SPONDIN~
~NSTAL~ED LOOATION AT THE TIHE OF GONST~OTION.
1. ALL ANDREH5 HOTOR5 ARE GENDE~ SPECIFIC, AND
HIlL BE HIRED 5TA~TIN~ ~ITH THE HALE END OF THE
GABLE AT THE BT5 A~ CONTINUE ALON~ THE ~N
FOLLOHIN¢ THE "FEHALE UP ROLE".
MINIMUM CABLE BEND:'IN¢ ~ADIU~
1/2"4~ (ATOI2JBO) 0"
'7/8"4~ (ATO'"/SJBO) lO"
I-B/8"¢ (ATIBSJBO) 20"
ALPHA
ANTENNA
BETA
ANTENNA
GAHHA
ANTENNA
CABLE 2 GABLE
I TEl'4 PAt~,T NUMBE~ Id~T'r'.
CABLE I 8&O IooB, S (164 '~T.) 2
CABLE 2 8~0 IO00q (1~ FT.) 2
CABLE ~, 8~0 I000~ (IS FT.) 2
t~,CU ~0 1002B 6
II RED
II BLUE
II ®REEN
TERtqlNATE IN
PPG GABINET
AT ETS
, I
ANTENNA OABLE BOHEh4ATiO
I lxl~ kC, ALE: NOT TO 5GALE I 24x~& Sd, ALE:
ESI
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
P. O. BOX3
HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730
TEL: 732.888.6210
FAX: 732.847.4335
Lou MoglLno, AIA
ARCHITECT
NJ - ¢~ Al 13345
NY - t4 028992-1
Robert W. Toms, P.E.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
NJ - # GE 36209
NY - 14 075384
CT - 14 22375
PA - 14 061412
2/21/0~ ISSUED FOR FILINO
2110/0~ RB/15EI~ PER CLIENT CONNENT5
Pq/2q/O~ Rb/15EP PER CLIENT 601~NT5
PATE
SEAL
metroPCS
New York LLC
5 SKYLINE DRIVE
HAWTHORNE, NY t 0532
SITE I NFO~-h'fATI ON
12~ ~OUNZ) AVENUE
MATTITUOK, NY 11~52
~ESI~N TYPE:
C,O-LOOATION
DHo
~HEET TITLE:
PATE:
06/02/0~
I NF Of~,iVIA T I O N
SHEET NUh,IDE~
· ELECTriC: P~.OVIDE AND INSTALL A '~O~V Ot~ 240V, 'rap, ~ ~I~.E Clt~.COIT F~O~ A ~L~A~L~ ~OU~ TO TH~ ~O~UNI~ATIO~ ~A~INET. ~l~ A~ A~OV~ FINI~H~ ~OO~ ~ ~A~TE~ ~OUN~ ~A~
BETWEEN THE 5PEOIFIE~ VOLTAGE, THEN GALL TH~ A*OHITEOT. ALL ELEOT*IOAL E~UIPM~NT 5HALL DE LADELE~ *ITH O CONDUIT N NEWT*AL G R O
LINE
TO
LINE.
IT
NOT
A BLACK PLASTIC TAr HITH HHITE LETTERS "METRO PCS" EN~AVEO IN IT. OB CIRCUIT B~EA~ER NEC NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE
EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC PNL PANEL
2. UTILITY METE~: I~ A UTILI~ METE~ 15 SPEOIFIE~ ON THE PRALINES, IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RES¢ONS/BIL[~ TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY TUBIN~ ~P PO~E~ PANEL A E C ~ ~ T E C T U R E
METE~ AND TAP LOCATION P~lO~ TO INSTALLATION. THE A~OHITEST BE~IN5 THE PAPER~O~ ~ITH THE MAllOW5 UTILITY COMPANIES AND GAN
PO~ER 15 ~E~UI~E~, ALL NEC AND/O~ LOCAL ELECTRIC CODE5 5HALL BE A~HE~ED TO. CONTACT METRO PO5 ~I~ELE55 P~IO~ TO MAKIN¢ MOB MAIN CIRCUIT B~EAKE~ RA RI¢ID ALUMINUM HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730
TEMPOrArY PO~E~ CONNECTIONS. M~P MAIN OlSTRIBUTION PANEL ReS RI~[O ~ALVANIZEO STEEL TEL: 7 3 2 8 8 8 6 2 1 0
D. ~:PROVIPE A 2" CONDUIT ~ITH A 25 PAIR ~22 A~5 TAPPAN ~IRE AND GABLE ¢ 225OBD25/~T/PB/DK~LAOK O~ E~UAL B~ ~: 7 ] 2.8 4 7.4
5UPPLIE~: 5TONY POINT PN: 5PEHTO[-40 (40 FT I~W¢EWEPE) 40 FOOT LENGTH ~ITH 4-RJ45 GONNEGTO~5 ORIM~E~ ON ONE EN~. [ou Mog~o,A~ Rob~t W. Toms, P.E.
THE MAIN ~MA~OATION POINT ALLO~ PO~ TH~ LEAST AMOUNT OP NOI~E AN~ THE MOST AMOUNT O~ P~OTE~T[ON. ~o~ ~OET 5AVlN~5, A ARCHITECT STRUC~LENGINEER
OLOEE~ ~EMA~OATION POINT MA~ BE CPEOIFIE~ IN MULTIPLE 5TO~ BUILDIN¢5 ~ITH THE APPROVAL OF THE TELEPHONE OOMPAN~. YO~ NE~ NJ- ¢AI 13345 NJ- ~ GE 36209
TELEPHONE 5E~VIOE5 IN NJ, N~ & 0% ~OMI~ A 4" OONDUIT ~ITH A ~ACLINE PROM THE 5PEOlFIEP UTILI~ ~OL~ TO THE LOOATION OF THE NE~ ~-~ 028992-1 ~' ¢ 075384
CT - ~ 22375
~EMA~OATION POIN% PA - ¢ 061412
4. CON,WiT ~OUTIN~: THE ~OUTIN~ OF THE CONDUIT SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE EASieST AN~ MOST PRACTICAL METHODS A~E UBE~ ~ITHOUT
IMPAOTIN~ THE BUILOIN~ O~NE~ ANO THE AESTHETIC APPEAL OF THE BUILDINg. BECAUSE THE ~O~K ~BEIN~ ~ONE IS IN EXISTIN~ STRUCTURES, IT IS ~ 12/21/0~ ISSUED FOR PILINe des
IMPOSSIBLE TO SHO~ EME~Y JUNCTION BOX, LB, OONOUIT BEN~, ETC. IN A T~O OIMENSIONAL PLAN· IT 15 FOR THIS REASON THAT THE
OONTRAOTO~ ~UST VISIT THE BITE BEFORE AOOEPTIN~ THE OFFE~ ANO UNOE~STAN~ THE T~UE INSTA,LLATION OBSTACLES THAT A~E UNIQUE TO A
THAT BUILOINS.~F~ 12/10/0~ ~VBEDPERGLIENT~MMENB
~0~/25/0¢ ~VI~P PER OLIENT O0~ENTfi
WI BIN G M ETH ODS LEGEND
· VI~D PER 6LIENT COUNT5
I. 6ENE~AL: ALL ~I~IN~ IN DINI5HE~ AREA5 SHALL BE OONOEALE~ UNLE55 NOT~ OTHER~5E. IN UN~INIDHD~ AREAS DUOH AD DADENENTS, I~NTIDIE~ DESCRIPTION I~EN%IDI~ ~O~IP%ION R~v. DATE ~EVI~ION
2. BELO~ ~ADE (UNDE~¢~OUND IN EARTH O~ FILL): ALL CONDUITS SHALL HAVE A ~INIMUM BURIAL ~EPTH OF 24". B~ANOH CIRCUITS SHALL NE NE~ ELECTRIC NT NE~ UNdErgrOUND
CONSIST OF PULLED CONdUCTOrS IN ~I~EOT ~U~IEP SCHEDULE 40 PVO OONOUIT5. CONDUITS THAT A~RE BURIED UNDER EARTH THAT HAVE HEAV% TELEPHONE
SCHEDULE ~O PVO. P~IO~ TO EXCAVATION, A UTILI~ HA~ OUT SHALL DE DONE TO LOCATE EXISTIN~ UNDE~¢~OUN~ UTILITIES. PIOTU~E5 SHALL TELEPHONE
D. INDOORS (UNCLASSIFIED A~EA5): ALL FEE~E~5 SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN EMT. ALL B~ANCH OI~CUIT~ SHALL CONSIST OF ELECTRIC PL P~OPE~ LINE
PULLE~ CONDUCTORS IN EMT., EXCEPT 15 AND 20 AMPE~ I POLE LI~HTIN~ ~EOEPTAOLE, O~ MISCELLANEOUS D~ANOH CIRCUITS
COmmUNICATION CABINETS AND VIBRATING E~U~PMENT SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN FLEXIBLE HETALLIC CONDUIT, ~AXI~U~ 6' IN CoPYrigHT OF "THB H~ PEeleN eROUP, INC." AND
FOR THE EXCLUSIVE ~D~ BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY
4. OUTDOORS OR INDOORS CLASSIFIED 'CAMP' O~ 'HET' LOCATION: ALL FEEOE~5 AN~ B~ANOH CIRCUITS SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED ¢ON~NT OF THE CREATOR
CONOUOTO~S IN A~S OONOUIT CONNECTIONS TO COMMUNICATION CABINET AND VI~ATIN~ E~UIPMENT SHALL CONSIST OF PULLE~ CONDUCTORS IN
New Yo , LLC
5 S~LINE DRIVE
HA~HORNE, NY 10532
~;~ ~ NY~312
~ITE INFORMATIOX
SPECIAL E PHASIS CONCERNS AND LImITATiONS SYMBOLS AW XU
~ ~ ~ATTITU~, N~ I~
~UNI~ATION J~NTIFI~ ~I~TION I~NTIFI~ ~E~I~TI~N ~E~I~N T~P~
I. THE ARG~TEGT ~A~L B~ NOTIFIE~ IN~E~IAT~Y ~PON ~t~GOVERY OF A P~O~BE~ OR ~ONF~I~T. GONT~AGTO~ 6HABB P~O~T~Y ~ ~AFETY 6HITGH ~
I~ENTIF% ONE O~ ~O~E P~OPO~E~ 5OLUTION5 BUT 5HALL NOT P~OOEED UNTIL 50 AUTHORIZE~. CO-LOCATION
I PANEL ~OA~ ~ NE~ UTIL]~ POLE
LIMiTATiON5 ON DOWNTIME ~ ELECTRIC ~ETE~ ~ EXISTIN~ UTILITM POLE DRAAN BY. OHEGKE~ BY: DATE,
]. COORdiNATE ALL PI5OONNZOTION5 AND INTERRUPTION5 OF ~LEOT~IOAL 5E~VIOE AND ~OUNIPlN~ 5MSTE~ ~ITH TH~ O~NER. A
OF INTErrUPTIONS AN~ SHUTDOWN5 5HALL BE 5UDHITTED TO THE O~NE~ FO~ APPROVAL. TH}E 5OHE~ULE OF INTERRUPTION5 5HALL BE ~ ELEO~IOAL ~IRIN~ ~Ho
SUBMITTED TO THE O~NE~ A ~[NI~U~ OP T~O ~EEK5 P~IO~ TO AN% ANTICIPATED INTE~OPT~ON O~ SErViCE AND 5HALL BE APPROVED (TU~NIN~
D~ THE O~NE~ BE~O~E AN~ INTErrUPTION IS PERMITTED. SHEET TITLE
(TU~NLN~ ~OHN) ~L~OT~IGAL NOTE~
GONTRAGTOR~ ~ ~OmmUN~AT~ON~ ~A~INET AN~ I N~O~YATION
I. EAGH GONTRAGTOR ~HA~ ~EOU~ AN~ ~A~ ~ AbL ~I~E~ PE~NIT~ AN~ ~HA~L AR~A~E ALL ~E~UIRE~ IN~OTION~.
2. EACH ~ONT~A~TO~ ~HA~ OOO~INAT~ ~1~ ~ HITH T~E ~O~K OF ALL OTHER GONT~GT~'O~ AN~ EXI~TIN~ ~1~ GON~ITION~. ~ , DAGK~OAR~ ~HEET NU~E~ ~V.
:: 2, EXISTIN® TRAN&FORHER G R O U P~Z
D. EXISTIN~ &ERMINE T~OU~H TO TAP
,/~ :: E N G I N E E R I N G
m- ~ 4. PROVIDE NE~ 2OOA DYPA$S UTILIT~ P.O. BOX 3
'~" ,,. (, :: APPROVED M~TER SOCKET HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 0~30
TEL:
732.888.6210
I :' 5. P~OVI~E NE~ 200A, 25OV, NEMA ~ FUSED F~: 732 847.4335
-- OF PT6 6ADINET ~ACK. P~OVIDE (2) 2OOA, Lou Mog~o, A~ Robert W. Toms, P.E.
ARCHITECT STRUC~ ENGINEER ,
:: 25OV FUSES. NJ - ¢AI 13345 NJ - ~ GE 36209
' ~- ¢ 028992-1 ~' ~ 075384
TELOO. &EE A~CHITE~TU~AL ~A~IN~& ~O~ PA-~ 061412
, ,, 12/IO/Oq REVI~P PER 6LIENT 00~ENT5
x-- ~ _. 8. MASTER O~OUN~
~ ~ I ~ AN~ OAD
__ ~ ' 12. ~2 5OL[P TINNED OONDUOTO~ (T%P) TO
-- -- ~ONNEOTED TO POST~ AND OTHE~ ~ETAL
L ., OBJEOT&.
' / ID. P~OPOSE~ TELOO OONO~T& ~OUTE~
UN~/~¢~oUND. DUPLICATION OR USE ~ITHOUT ~XP~$~L~LMRIT~N
me, ',ro
New Yo ,
- ~: 5 S~LINE DRIVE
HA~HORNE, ~ t 0532
~T~ ~o~, O~MPSTSOII
NOTE: OONDUIT
OONOEPTUAL, AOTOAL ~OUTIN~ TO BE BASE~ &ITE INFORMATION
ON FIELD
MATTITUOK,
FLOOD LleHT HITH IOo ~ATT
~UARTZ LAMP. ~ ~ 200 AIMP ~EEPE~ ~¢~/O
T~PE:
~C (2) ~12 ~12~ - ~/4u OON~UIT
~ IOO AMP FEEDER B~2 * I*e~ 2" OO-LOOATION
HOUR
MEOHANIGAL
TIME~
IN NEMA ~ ENOLOSU~E TO~ ¢ ~ 4~ &O AM'P OI~OUIT ~4 ~ ~ I-I/4"
TIMER ~o AM~ OIROUIT 2~JO ¢ I~lOe ~/4" ~Ho &&b 06/02/0~
T~LOO ~EMA~O TO ~EE E-I 2" ELECTRICAL PLAN
E~UIPMENT
I 1~4/O 2"
T~OU~H ~ OABIN~T
ARCHITECTURE
~ 2. POR NF'W FENCE INSTALLATIONS E~ONE> ALL E N G I N E E R I N G
CORNER PENCE POSTS FROM ®ROUND RIN~ TO
i "'r'" "F'FPE OAO~ELO TO FENOE POST VIA OLAHP. P.O. BOX 3
COAX eROUNP COAX OROUNP ' ('THOMAS ~ ~TT~ ~20~ APPROVED EQUAL) ~ZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730
KITAT KITAT ~ON~ ALL ~ATE ~O¢T5 AN~ ~ATE PRAME~ ~[TH TEL: 732.888.6210
FENCE ~OUN~ A~EMBLIE~ O~
~OUN~
KIT
EQUAL. Lou Mo~no, A~ Robe~ W. Toms, P.E.
ARCHITECT STRUCTU~ ENGI~ER
x ~ ~. ALL COAXIAL GABLE5 5HALL ~E cROUN~E9 TO NJ - $ A113345 NJ - ¢ GE 36209
~ - ~ O75384
~ ~ A UNINSULATED ~ROUND BAR VIA GABLE ~-~ 028992-1 CT- ~ 22375
F ~OUN~ ~IT~. N~TON INSTRUMENT COMPAN~
j~ EQUAL. THIS ¢~OUN~ BAR SHALL BE LOOATEO PA-¢ 061412
UNINSULATED ~ ,JUST ~ELO~ THE POINT HHERE ALL OABLE5 A
~OUN~
BAR
~ PI~EOTL~ TO TH~ TO~E~ VIA BEAM OLAMP.
4. ALL COAXIAL CABLES LEAVING THE
COMMUNICATION CA~INET SHALL BE ~ROUNOE~
~ , TO A UNINSULATED ~OUNO BA~ VIA GABLE A
~OUNO ~ITS. NEWTON I~STRU~ENT OOMPAN~
O~ EQUAL. THIS ~OUNO ~A~ SHALL BE
A
LOOATED AT THE POINT ~HE~E THE CABLES
o~/ol/o¢
~EVI~D PER CLIENT OOHHEN5
o OOAX CABLE
I ~EVISION
= ~ THE ]NSULATE~ ¢~OUN~ BA~ TO THE ~ROUNP
COAX
~IT~OUN~ ~ ~IN¢ VIA '¥" TYPE CAD~EL~,
(I)
~OAX
OABL~
~ ~ ~ ~ 6. D/~"%XIO' 5~OUND ~OP GAD HELDED TO ~2
ONINSULATEO ~. ~2 A~ ~OLI~ OONTJNUOU$ TiNNE~
A~AY F~O~ ALL FOUNOATIONS. SEE
J 2 /ANTENNA ¢~OUN~[N~ ~ETAIL 5P'EOIFIOATIONS.
j 24xB6 SOALE: NTB. 8. ~/b"~ X I0~ COPPER-6LAD STEEL ~OUND ~OD.
I lxlW
SOALE:
NTS.
~ ~ ~, MO~E THAN 2/B OF THE ¢00 LENGTH MUST BE ~o~ ~.~ ~xcnu~v~ u*~ ~r r.~ rrrb~ cu~x*. ASr
DELO~ THE LOOAL FROST LINE.
~> 2~2 DOLID =- O~OUND ~rNo ~1 I. ANTENNA. (~OHEMATlO ~EP~EDENTATION, ~EE ~O~N~, N~ 10~
II A~OHITEOTURAL ~A~IN~D FOR MOUNTINg.)
PVO INSPECTION . [~, ~T~ ~1 ~ , ,, 2, MAST.
ATTAOHmO TO Nm~ SITE INFORMATION
~OUND ~lNe~ ~~ 4, D~N~5.COAX ~ROUN~ KIT. ~0 NOT INSTALL ON
TESTHEL TEST~LL ~ TE~T ~E2L ~ETAIL e. ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE.
Ifxl~ BOALE: NTS. I 24xBb SCALE: NT5. CABINET. ~ESI~N TYPE:
~ '"', .... , OONNEOTION PAN~UIT 6ATALO6 ~ 6TAP O0-LOOATION
Min. q. ~ INTECRAL ~OUNO OON~UOTO~ ~ROM DRA~N ~Y: CHECKED DY: DATE:
~,-o,, , ~ ~ PHc 55e 06/021oq
I0. ~2 50LI~ TINNE~ OOPPER ~OUND~N~
~OAD~ELD CON~UOTO~ 8" MINIMUM RADIUS.
SHEET
TITLE
IO'-O" GONN~OTION
~ ~ - ~ ~ OONNEOTION PANDU~T OATALOD ~ OTAP
I ~OUNOlN~ ONE LINE OlA~¢AM 4 ¢0~ ~ETAIL
IlxlW 50ALE~ NTS. 24xD6 SOALE, NTS. IIxIW 50ALE, NTS. 24xD6 SGALE; NTS.
~2 Al, N®
(T"~' 2
ANTENNA ®~..OUN~IN®
~ETAIL
ANTENNA
~BLf= TO PIPt= C, ONN~C~TOt~
DUt~N~¥ TYPE ®At~
(TYP 2 PLOS)
~f~OUNI21N~ KIT
12" APPI~,OX.
D D/4" = 6" ·
I-I/4" DIA.
hdAX. --
ANTENNA (.'ABLE ~)
PIEATHEP--PP-OOPINO K. IT
ANDP. EPI ~221"~1D
~ A~I® 5TfW. ANOED C, OPP'E~ O~.OUND
~I~E (®~.OUNS::ED TO ~.OUND
(5TAND~AI~:2 ANDW. E~ ®~.OUNOlN® ~-.IT)
CONNECTION OF CABLE ~t~OUND KIT
TO ®PS ANTENNA CABLE
2 I/2" DIA. -- m ~L, 2" =_,= ¢"
¢~ API~ 5Tt~.ANDED OOPPEf~' ~I~OUND
~Ill~E (®t~-OUNDED TO ~t~.OUN~
(¢TANPAt:~4? ANI?t~,EY'I ~I~-OLINDIN~ ~IT)
NOTE: I20 NOT IN~TALL CAE, LE Ot~OL.JNO KIT AT A BEND
AND ALP,,AY'S DIf~;::CT
TO ~I~OUN~D
2
;ONNEOTION OF: CABLE ®I~-.OUNO F-.L
FTC PANEL SCHEOULE
200 AMP MAIN 24 CI~CUIT 120/240x/
SPAW, E 80 I00 IvTOE)CELL POk',IE~
D 4
~,ECEPTACLE 15 5 6 20 LI®HT
EBRE AC UNIT 15
~ I0
I~ 14
SPAOE . SPACE
SPAOE SPAOE
21 22
5PAOE SPAOE
23 24
MAiN CIRCUIT B~EAtC. E~ ~ATIN~ - 22,000 AIC
I PTO PANEL SC, HEI?ULE
Ixl"l SCALE: NTS,
I 24xD(~ SCALE, NTS.
I~lxl~ SCALE: N.T.S.
PAN
0
0
0
~2/0 5TW. ANDE/P
~W. OUNI~IN~
0
iv'AIN ~f~.OUNI?IN® DOPIN OON~UC.,TOR.
4
I FIASTE:R ®t~..OUND DA~. TE~JMINATION ~ETAIL
Ilxl-t SC, ALE: NTS.
SCALE: NTS.
124xD8 SCALE: N.T.S.
~-.E'f NOTtE~ (Sujmlool~ (~, (~),
I.
ALL COAXIAL CAt~LES LEAVIN® THE
COMMUNICATION CABINET SHALL BE
®~,oUNIDE5) AT THIS POINT VIA CABLE
®W, OUN~D ~.ITS. NEATON INST~U~ENT COMPAN~
O~ ~UAL. ~D-~[42 (~ROUND DAR 20"
~/4"), ~DO~I-4 (IN~ULATOR~), ~DOI~-~ (~/g"
LOOK~ASHERS), ~A-6056 (~ALL MOUNTIN~
DOLTS).
HYPRAULIOALLY COMPP, ESSE~D LON® BA~W, EL
'a-HOLE ®W, OUN~DIN® LU~ ~=0~- ~ROUN~IN~
OON~UOTO~¢ BETWEEN OADLE AN~ THE
MASTE~ ~OUNO ~A~ TErMiNAL. THOMAS
BETTS ~54811BE O~ E~UAL.
~. HYORAULICALLY COMP~ESSEO LON~
DA~,~EL 2-HOLE ®t~,OUNOIN® LU® FO~ THE
MA~N ~OUN~iN~ ~OHN OON~UCTO~
TErmINAL AN~ THE MAIN ~OUN~IN~
O~ EQUAL.
4. ~/~'" STAINLESS STEEL OlA~ETE~ ~OLTS TO
oONNEOT 6~OUN~N~ LU~ TO THE ~OUN~
STAINLESS STEEL ~IAMETE~ FLAT
I,~ASHEA (TYPICAL).
P, IASHEW. (TYPICAL).
~/8" HEX HEAI~ STAINLESS STEEL NUT
(TYPICAL).
P~.OVIOE LOCKTITE TH~.EAO LoCK. E~ P-.ED TO
Pt~EVENT THEFT.
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
P. O. BOX 3
HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730
TEL: 732.888.6210
FAX: 732.847.4335
Lou Moglino, AIA
ARCHITECT
NJ - ¢~ Al 13345
NY - ~4 028992-1
Robert W. Toms, P.E.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
NJ - ~ GE 36209
NY - ~ 075384
CT - g 22375
PA - ~ 061412
2/21/0q ISGUEO FO~ FILIN®
2/lO/Oq
9b125/oq
SEAL
metroPC.%
New York LLC
5 SKYLINE DRIVE
HAWTHORNE~ NY 10532
SITE INFOrmATION
iMATTI TUOK, N'f
I~ES[®N
OO-LOOATI ON
BHo SSt 06/02/0~
SHEET TITLE
SHEET NU MDE~-.
L" 4