The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About36047-ZTown of Southold Annex 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 8/5/2011 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 35121 Date: 8/5/2011 THIS CERTIFIES that the building WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Location of Property: 165 PECONIC LA, PECONIC, SCTM #: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 75.-5-14.1 Subdivision: Filed Map No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore 11/17/2010 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 36047 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: antenna on existing communication tower and accessory equipment as applied for (Metro PCS). Lot No. filed in this officed dated dated 11/23/2010 The certificate is issued to Town of Southold (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 36057 7/29/11 Aut~o/~l(ure, '/ FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Southold, N.Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) FULL PERMIT NO. 36047 Z Date NOVEMBER 23, 2010 Permission is hereby granted to: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PO BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 for : CO-LOCATION OF A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA ON AN EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS TOWER & RELATED ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT PER PLAAINING BOARD APPROVAL at premises located at 165 County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 075 pursuant to application dated NOVEMBER Building Inspector to expire on MAY PECONIC LA SOUTH/PEC Block 0005 Lot No. 014.001 17, 2010 and approved by the 23, 2012. Fee $ 500.00 Authorized Signature ORIGINAL Rev. 5/8/02 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL 76S-I$02 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCuPANcy This application must b¢ filled in by typ~vriter or ink and submitted to the Building Department with the following: A. For new building or new use: l. Fina~ zu~'ey of property with accurate location of all bu/ld/ng% propeW/lin~, sheets, and unnsual usturat ar · topographic feature. 2.Final Approval from Health D~l. of water supply and sewerage~dlsposal (~-9 form). 3.Approval ofeleotrical installation from Board 6fFire Underwrlte~cs. 4.Sworn statement from plumber ce~fying tha! the solder used in system contains l~ss than 2/10 of l%'l~ad, 5. Commewial building, industrial building, maltiple resideno~ arid similar build/ng~ and installations, a certificate of Code Complianc~ from architect or ~gineer r~sponsible for the building. 6. Submit planning Board Approval ofcompleted site plan rexluLr~ments. B. For existing buildings (prior to April 9, 195'/) non-conforming uses, or tmildings and "pre-exisfin~" I~,nd I. A~urate survey of property showing all property lines stre~ buildklg anffunusn ~nac~ll ~o6iterlp~tl~ ~ ['~ · 2, A properly cqmpleted application and consent to inspect signed by the applicant., ~irtificate of Occupancy denied' the Building lnsp¢ct°rshallstatethere~s°ns'thcrcTorinwri!ingt°theaPPIlU~~a~}~ JUL ~ I. certifiesm ofO~eupancy - New dwelling $$0.00, Ad&lions to dwe",i,,~ $$0.00, t~ xN . Swlmming po01 $50~00, Acc~sory building $50.00, Additions to accessory buildi g $30.00, ~ $~L~.00,. ~ 2_ Ceytifieate of Occupancy on Fro-existing Building - $!00_00 '/ 3. Copy ofCertifieatc ofOccupanc~ - $.2~ . ( 4. UpdateACcttificateofOccupahcy-$50.00 ~. 5. Temporary Certificate 0fOccapancy - R~sidential $15.00, CommeWi~l $15.00 New Construction: Location of Property: · House No. Own6r or Owners o.f Property: "7--0 guffolk ,County Tax Map No 10~0, Section Su~livisi~n Old or Pre-existing Building:' Peco.., LA-, ~' _ (check one) ....... Filed Map,.. Lo~. Undex~t~rs Approval:. /~ · . Final. Certificate: ~-'~ ~ (check one) Health De~t. Approval: pl~nning Board Approval: Request for: Temporary Certificate __ Fen: Submitted: $ ,~_ 0 ~ Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York I 1971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1802 Fax (63 l) 765-9502 roqer, richert~town.southold.ny, us BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRICIAL COMPLIANCE SITE LOCATION Issued To: Peconic Address: 165 Peconic La City: Peconic St: NY Zip: 11958 Building Permit #: 36057 Section: 75 Block: 5 Lot: 14.001 WAS EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE Contractor: DBA: Complete Wireless Cont. License No: SITE DETAILS Office Use Only Residential [~ Indoor ~ Basement Commerical Outdoor 1st Floor New Renovation 2nd Floor Addition Survey Attic INVENTORY Service 3 ph Hot Water GFCI Recpt Main Panel NC Condenser Single Recpt Sub Panel NC Blower Range Recpt Transformer Appliances Dryer Recpt Disconnect Switches Twist Lock Other Equipment: 200a power to 2 control panels at cell site [ Service Only [~ Pool Hot Tub Garage Ceiling Fixtures I~I HID Fixtures Wall Fixtures ~ Smoke Detectors Recessed Fixtures ~.~ CO Detectors Fluorescent Fixture~.~ Pumps Emergency Fixtures!,__~ Time Clocks Exit Fixtures [__J TVSS Inspector Signature: Date: July 29 2011 81-Gert Electrical Compliance Form TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPT. 765-1802 INSPECTION [ ]FOUNDATION 1ST [ ]FOUNDATION 2ND [ ]FRAMING / STRAPPING ROUGH PLBG. INS~AT~ON [/~INAL [ ] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY [ ] FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION [ ] FIRE RESlSTAXT CONSTRUCTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT PENETRATION REMAR~<~ ~~_~~~? TOWN OF SOU'I:HOLD B,UILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 www. north fork.net/Southoid/ Examined lJ..t , 201 Approved ~ ~ [¥~4 20 I LO Disapproved a/c , I {' Expiration ~'/,~ q, 20 I ~" PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Do you have or need the following, before applying? Board of Health 4 sets of Building Plans Planning Board approval .2 ~5 [ ~ "/ Survey Cheek [ :" ~ 1~1SepticForm .... ' ' Ill 'E'C' i! j/?ontact: t.J [i "2~I Mail to: Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS Date ,20 a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule· b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date· If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance ora Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York and other applitm,.b, le Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described· The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code hgm/ng code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections· /' I /9~J ,~ ~. . Met~<oPC.S ~ LLC uan ulmettl By:~ ~ " NY VP/( M (Signature o'o'o'o'~ applicant or name, ifa corporation) i 5 S.~line Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Lessee Name of owner of premises Town of Southold (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. N/^ Electricians License No. Other Trade's LicenseNo. N/A I. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: Town of Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY House Number Street County Tax Mal$~&'l~00 Section Subdivision (Name) 75 Hamlet Block 5 Filed Map No. Lot Lot 14.1 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Police station and public utility wireless telecommunications facility b. Intended use and occupancy. Public utility wireless telecommunications foci lity 3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building. Addition Alteration t [Repair ~Rem. oval~.Dcmolitiqq L O~er Worlq ~Affi,x pub, 1 ic uti 1 i ty wi rel ess elecommumca~jons antennas go exls~;l§~l /i~:~OO (nil;all .l['~laLeU equipment on ~ne.gr_ouna, as~ ceplc~ea in ~ne plans suomlg~eo herewith. (Description) 4. Estimated Cost .~r ~'~0o0.00 Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front* Height. Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Depth Height 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front Rear .Depth *Existing 131'-6,!lattice tower {existing whip antennas to 145') Rear Number of Stories 10. Date of Purchase 7/11/1968 Rear .Depth *Proposed equipment within a 12'x15' fenced compound. Rear .Depth William M. geebe, Robert D. Boyd Name of Former Owner & Robert E. Rehm 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated R-80 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES__ NO X 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES__ NO × 5 95 Ro30 Ut~y2 5 14. Names of Owner of premises Town of Southold AddressSOuthOld, ll§71phone No. 631-765-1800 Name of Architect MTM Design Group Inc. Address~_.0.,Bo_x 3,^~.~ehqhone No 732-888-6210 NameofContractor Address,~W um~=y~ut/ou PhoneNo. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES__ * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this proPeCy within 300 feet ora tidal wetland? * YES__ NO X * IF YES?D.E!C~. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. NO X 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenant~ and restrictions STATE OF NEW YORK) IF YES, PROVIDE m ~ respect to this property?* YES__ SS: COUNTY %a.~n ~)[ m,~.l~- being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named, No X (S)He is the Lessee (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this ~/~/~ day of /Q3~t( Notary Public DIANE LgVELLE NOTARY PUqLIC. State Of New York No. 0~LA6027870 om]~sion Exp.'~s Ju~y 19, 20 ~ 206,5 Metro~ By: ~ ,,.5 //~/0-- Sig?~ of Applicant Dan Olmetti NY VP/GM FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: September 29, 2009 TO: Town of Southold C/O Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Ave. Huntington, NY 11743 Please take notice that your application dated September 1,2009 For permit to construct co-location wireless telecommunications facility: Location of property: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the tbllowing grounds: The proposed construction is a pennitted use on this 12.10 acre lot located in the R-80 Residential zone. Pursuant to Section 280-70(E), the proposed use requires a special exception and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: d/2 / // / O¢ .~;. Date Sent: Project Name: Project Address: Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000, ¢,~ - - ,//-~, f Zoning District: ' 6.0 ' (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: .2~00 -~]/ t.5 ~/~?~-~( ~( Initial Determination as to required: ,.~,~J'-~ p~¢ ~q ~ ~ ~ -70 ~E ) ' Signature of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / / Date of Comment: / / Comments: Final Determination Date: / / Decision: Signature of Planning Dept. Staff Reviewer Sionature of Buildin.cl Inspector Initial ~,,~tion FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY PLAN USE DETERMINATION Date: ~ / // / O~ ,~. Date Sent: ~ ! /f Project Name: Project Address: Suffolk County Tax Map No.:lO00- ~2,~- 5 - l~l,f Zoning District: (Note: Copy of Build ng Permit Application and suppoAing do~mentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: ~7~°O-7/ 1.5 ~ z~r/,~,,/-/~/ Initial Determination as. to w,b, ether site plan is required: ,.~ [--~--~. ~)~ ~ ~ccz~-h~m K'-~ d- /¢~9-7o ~E) ' -" Signa~re of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: -, ..... ~" ....... ' ~:~ ~ P.D. Date Received: /_ ! Date of Comn~e~{i~" :~,- ~~ Signature of Pl~ng-Dg~t~st~ff'~viewer Final Determination Date: / / Decision: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI FebmarylS, 2011 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 BLDG. DEPT. TON~/N OF SOUTHOLD Site plan for Metro PCS ~ Southold Police Station Located: Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: As per your request, the Planning Staff conducted a site inspection of the above property on February 8, 2011 where the site work was determined to be in conformance with the approved site plan. Please note any future requested change to the site plan should include a copy of the approved stamped site plan noting the location of the requested change. If you have any questions regarding the above, contact me anytime. Thank you. Sincerel. y __ Kristy Winser Senior Planner Cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI November 16, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southald, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southald, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re; Approval: Site Plan for Metro PCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, November 15, 2010: WHEREAS, this application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on February 25, 2010 including a site plan prepared by Lou Moglino, AIA, dated May 8, 2009; and WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent technical consultant retained by the Town to assist in the review process; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met;'and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies having jurisdiction and by the independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and Metro PCS at Southold Police Station Pa.qe Two November 16, 2010 WHEREAS, on September 16, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and recommended the proposed project be found consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, a public hearing was held and closed by the Southold Town Planning Board regarding the special exception consideration and site plan; and WHEREAS, the application is eligible for waiver of site plan elements under § 280-76.2 on the basis that the wireless facility is existing on property owned and used by the Town Department of Public Works and the base equipment shelter can not be seen from other properties and roads; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on November 12, 2010, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and certified that the proposed action is a permitted use in this Residential 40 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board granted a Special Exception Approval for this application; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the action is consistent under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and be it further RESOLVED, the Planning Board hereby waives the full landscaping requirement pursuant to section § 280-76.2 as described above; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the site plan entitled "Metro PCS", prepared by Lou Moglino, R.A., dated May 08, 2009, and last revised September 02, 2010, including the following six plans: 1. T-1 Title Sheet 2. Z-01 Radius Map & surrounding Information 3. Z-02 Site Plan & Zoning Information 4. Z-03 Partial Site Plan & Equipment Plan 5. Z-04 Tower Elevations & Details 6. Z-05 Site Details Metro PCS at Southold Police Station PaRe Three November 16, 2010 Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative, must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. A copy of the approved site plan (6 pages) is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encl. CC: Town Engineer w/map Building Dept. w/map S~,TM # - ~ ~ "~ "'"' \ © O0 ~--1 ~ ~.-~ ~, / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD { 1 OWNER STREET I ~ ~ VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT REMARKS TYPE OF BLD. PROP. LAND IMP .... TOTAL DATE ~ ~oo 52 ~oo ~0~e FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT BULKHEAD TOTAL COLOR 4/09 Dog Shelter 1 st 2nd PC CB M. Bldg. ~x¢~- "~'~ Foundation OT.ER Bath Dinette Extension ~.-~ ~:'~13¢ ~ ~t~ ~ Basement C~WL ~ Floors Kit. Extension ~ ~ Finished B. Interior Finish L.R. Garage ~'~ e~ ~ ~ )N ~ ~Ex,. Walls BR Porch Dec,Patio ~x~ ~ Fam. Rm.: Pool ~,~ ~,~ ~ ~ ;~ Foyer , A.C. ~ ~~ ~ ~ , Laundry O.B. ~W~ _ ~ StudyLibra~/ Dock 75.-~-14.1 3/08 I Foundation OTHER Bath 08-05-11;08:56AB; ; ~ 1/ Read P.O, Box 1179 BUTI.I~I~G DEPARTMENT TOWN OF $OUTHOLD APPL CATION FOR ELEC_T.~ICAL iNSPECT[ON REQUESTED BY: 'Name: Name: No.: Phone No.: Date: ,~,/~/// *Name: *Address: *Cross Street: *Phone No,: . Permit No.: Tax Map District: JOBSITE INFORMATION: (*Indicates required information) 1000 Section: ('.~-4- ~ *BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK (Please Print Clearly) (Please Cimle All That Apply) *is Job ready for inspection: *Do you need a Temp Certificate: Temp Information (ff neededl, *Service Size: 1 Phase 3Phase *New Service: Re-connect Additional Information: 100 150 200 Underground Numl~er of Meters Rough In Final 300 350 400 Other Change of Servi~e Overhead PAYMENT DUE WITH APPL CATION 82-Request for Inspeelion Form q'ow~a Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF $OUTItOLD January 26, 2011 Re', Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP, Attys. 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Telephone (631) 765-1802 Fax (631) 765-9502 RE: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, Town of Southold Police Station TWO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: '"~---Application for Certificate of Occupancy. (Enclosed) Electrical Underwriters Certificate. A fee of $50.00. Final Health Department Approval. Plumbers Solder Certificate. (A~I permits involving plumbing after 4/1184) __ Trustees Certificate of Compliance. (Tow~ Trustees #765-1892) __ Final Planning Board Approval. Final Fire Inspection from Fire Marshall. __ Final Landmark Preservation approval. Building Permit: 36047-Z Antenna for Metro PCS RI , NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW HUNTINOTO~, N:~w YOR~r 117413 September 1,2009 BY HAND Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 1 I971 MetroPCS New York, LLC Building Permit Application (for Denial) Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: Town of Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York SCTM#: 1000-75-5-14.1 Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS"), submitted herewith is the captioned Application as follows: 1. Town of Southold Building Permit Application; 2. Building Permit Application fee for denial: MetroPCS Check No. 4152 in the amount of $50.00; 3. Building Permit Application fee: MetroPCS Check No. 4151 in the amount of $500.00, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(1)(b); 4. Four (4) sets of Construction Drawings with Site Plans and Elevations, prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc. and dated August 31, 2009; 5. Property survey; 6. Two (2) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group and dated July 2, 2009, demonstrating the project's compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations in accordance with Town Code Sections 280-74B(1)(a) and 280-71H; 7. Two (2) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. and dated July 8, 2009, documenting the facility's structural compliance with local, state and federal codes in accordance with Town Code Section 280~74B(1)(b); and, 8. Copy of MetroPCS' FCC License and FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navagation, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74B(1)(c). Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours. R~,, NI.EL_SEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By:~ ~77~FZ./~_,L&d~- ~'~'~--/~ ' ~ Bailey (~ L~ark~n ' ~ BL Enclosures RI , NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTOtLN'EYS AT LAW HUNTINOTOI% NI~W YORK 117413 September 10, 2010 TELEPHONE: (081) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (681) 425-4104 By Hand Mr. Michael Verity Building Department To~vn of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (MetroPCS) (Site No. NY 7315) Supplemental Building Permit Application filing Premises: Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road), Peconic, NY SCTM#: 1000-75-5 14.1 [)ear Mr. Verity: As you know, we are the attorneys for MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS' hereafter), with respect to the captioned application. MetroPCS filed its original Building Permit Application on September 1, 2009. A Notice of Disapproval was issued thereafter on September 29, 2009. On February 25, 2010, MetroPCS filed its Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Applications with the Town Planning Board. Certain documents have been revised since the date of filing. We enclose the following revised documents 1hat we ask be filed in place of the original corresponding documents: 1 Two (2) sets of updated Structural Analysis Report, prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated August 25, 2010, which more clearly labels the existing antennas located on the tower as listed in the designed appurtenance loading table; 2. Two (2) sets of updated Tower Reinforcement Drawings & Specifications, prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated August 25, 2010; and 3. Two (2) sets of the Geotechnical Report, prepared by Soil Mechanics Drilling Corp., dated January 25,2010, for your reference. Please incorporate these documents into the application package on file with your office. Please note that we submitted these updated documents with the Planning Board. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, Rk, NIEI.SgN,..H3.~R & COUGHLIN, LLP Lawrence C. R6 l,CR:mk Enclosures 8EP 1 0 2010 BLDG D[PI. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ~6 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 117Zl, 8 TI~L~PI-IONE: (681) 4l~-Zl. lO0 FAi38Ii~ILE: (01~1) 425-4.104 November 19, 2010 BY HAND Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC Building Permit Application Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: Town of Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York SCTM#: 1000 75 5 14.1 Dear Sir/Madam: On behalf of our client, MetroPCS New York, LLC, we enclose, herewith, replacement MetroPCS New York, LLC check no. 6702 in the sum of $500.00, which sum represents the Building Permit Application fee pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(1 )(a). It is our understanding that Building Permit can now be processed. Please contact our office once the Building Permit is ready so that we can pick up same from the Building Department. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the uodersigned. Very truly yours, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: .lC:ink Enclosure Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 Aeronautical Study No. 2009-AEA-2370-OE Issued Date: 08/26/2009 Marc Harris HPC Development, LLC 52 Garden Ave. Wharton, NJ 07885 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Location: Latitude: Longitude: Heights: Antenna - Side Mount NY7315 Peconic, NY 41-02-29.00N NAD 83 72-27-30.87W 132 feet above ground level (AGL) 148 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination is based, in pan, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. Page 1 of 3 ~ If we. can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (718) 553-4542. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2009-AEA-2370-OE. Signature Control No: 644345-118052324 Katie Venticinque Specialist (DNE) Attachment(s) Frequency Data Page 2 of 3 Frequency Data for ASN 2009-AEA-2370-OE LOW FREQUENCY HIGH FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP ER]' UNIT 806 824 MHz 500 W 824 849 MHz 500 W 851 866 MHz 500 W 869 894 MHz 500 W 896 901 MHz 500 W 901 902 MHz 7 W 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W 932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW 935 940 MHz 1000 W 940 941 MHz 3500 W 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W 2305 2310 MHz 2000 W 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W 1730 1740 MHz 61 dBm 2130 2140 MHz 61 dBm Page 3 of 3 Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Radio Station Authorization LICENSEE NAME: Met.oPCS fiW5. LLC ~ARK A. ST~CHIW ~ETROPCS fidS. LLC B144 WfiLNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 800 DALLAS TX 7823i FCC Registration Number (FRN) 0015005598 Call Sign File Number WOGA731 0002773870 Radio Service Grant Date Effective Date 11-29-2006 Expiration Date 11-29-2021 Print Date 11-30-2006 Market Number Channel Block I Sub-Market Designator REAO01 j D 0 1 st Build-out Date 2nd Build*out Date 3rd Build-out Date 4th Build-out Date SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS Conditions: Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communications Act of 193,4, aS amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the ffrequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 11934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. Section 310(d). This license is subject in terms 1o the right of use or control conferred by ~ection 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S,C, Section 606. To view the geographic areas associated with the license, go to the Universal Licensing System (ULS) homepage at http:~/wirele~s.fcc,gov/uls and select "License ,~earch". Fellow the instructions on how to search for license information, · Page 2 of= 2 license~- Name: I~etroPC5 AWS, LLC Call Sign File Number Print Date WOGA731 0002773870 11 - 30- 200e Special Conditions or Waivers/Conditions FCC 601 - MB 02/23/2010 12:33 518-486-4487 NYSD~S CODES PAGE 01181 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Code Enforcement and Administration Phone: (5 ! 8,) 474-4073 TECHNICAL BULLETIN (;ode Effective Date: January 1, 2003, January ], 2008 5~urce Document: 19NYCRR - B~ilding Code of Nea, York State (BCNYS) Topic: Communication Towers, Cellular Towers, and Wind Generators '-his docmaent is to c)arify thc application o£ thc requirements o£Buddi.g Code t,fNew York (BC~S) section 3108, ~t~tled "Radio and Television/ow~s," S~tion 3108,1. etlfitl~ general, S~;ect to the prov~3~o~ts of Chapter 16 and the reqmrememr of Chapter 15 governfng the fire- res~stonce-raua~ of buildings for the sz~pport of roof structm~, radio and t~tevisio~ towers *halt d~g"~ and construe'ted aa her~i, provided 9uild~ng Code ofNe~ ~rk &ate (BC~S) Chapter 16. ~nfitl~ structural design, contains the seismic · equi~me~ tbr buildings and Chapt~' 15. entitl~ roof assemblies agd rooftop structure, contains ip<ific r~mrma~t$ for rooftop struct~es m s~tion 1509 Seetton 3108,4. states thal towers shall be l~gned to resist wind Io~ in acco~a~ce wifl~ TIA/EIA 22~ "Structural Standards for $teeJ Although EIA/TIA 222-B contain, pxovisions whlch a. ep.bc~btc tJ;rec-st ndin, tow,rs~ m~ltcd on a building, section 3108.] is applicable When a free-madding towm is acco~anied by bui]di.8 for cquipment, the building i~ regulated by ~hc Ronald E. Piester, A.I.A., Director Division of Code Enforcement and Administration Pinnacle Telecom Group Consulting and Enginee~ng Services Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report MetroPCS Site NY7315 41405 Route 25 Peconic, NY July 2, 2009 14 Ridgedale Avenue - Suite 209 · Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927 · 973.451.1630 CONTENTS Introduction and Summary Antenna and Transmission Data Mathematical Compliance Analysis Compliance Conclusion Certification 3 5 7 12 12 Appendix A. Background on the FCC: MPE Umit Appendix B. Summary of Expert Qualifications Introduction and Summary At the request of MetroPCS, Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for a proposed wireless base station antenna operation to be added to an existing monopole at 41405 Route 25 in Peconic (Town of Southold), NY. MetroPCS refers to the site by the code "NY7315', and proposes panel antennas arranged for sectorized service coverage using the 2130-2140 MHz frequency band. The FCC requires all wireless operators to perform an assessment of the RF fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the compliance assessment needs to incorporate the RF effects of existing antenna operations at the site by AT&T (also known as Cingular), Nextel, Keyspan Corporation, and the Town of Southold. Note that FCC regulations require any future antenna collocator to specifically assess and assure continuing FCC compliance based on the overall RF effects of all proposed and then- existing antennas at the site. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula - and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, though, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment such as this can be described in layman's terms by expressing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded and there is a need to mitigate the potential exposure, while calculated RF levels lower than 100 percent indicate compliance with the limit. We can (and will) also describe the worst-case result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below- the-limit" factor. The result of the FCC compliance assessment in this case is as follows: The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed antenna operations at the site is 0.4200 percent (i.e., less than one-half of one percent) of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst- case calculated RF level is more than 235 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. The results of the calculations provide clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed antenna operations will be in clear compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and assumptions we incorporated in the analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than these calculation results indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: relevant technical data on the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation at the site, as well as on the existing antenna operation; a description of the FCC model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and analysis of the results, and the compliance conclusion for the antenna site. In addition, two Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit along with a list of key FCC references on compliance. Appendix B provides a summary of the qualifications of the expert certifying FCC compliance for this site. AntEnna and Transmission Data The table below summarizes the relevant technical data for the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation. Technical Data. MetroPCS ~ Frequency Band 2130 - 2140 MHz Service Coverage Type Sectorized - with identical transmission and compliance-related parameters Antenna Manufacturer & Model Kathrein 800-10504 (17.8 dBi) Antenna Centerline Height AGL 90 ft. RF Channels per Sector 7 Transmitter Power / RF Channel 24 watts (max.) Antenna Line Loss ~1 i n0red assumed 0 dB _ The antenna vertical-plane emission pattern is used in the calculations of RF levels at ground level around a site, as it is a key determinant of the relative amount of RF emissions in the "downward" direction. Figure I on the next page shows the vertical-plane emission pattern of the antenna model proposed here by MetroPCS. Note that in these types of antenna emission pattern diagrams, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. Note, too, that the use of a decibel scale to describe the relative pattern at different angles incidentally serves to significantly understate the actual focusing effects of the antenna. Where the antenna pattern reads 20 dB, for example, the relative RF energy emitted at the corresponding downward angle is 1/100th of the maximum that occurs in the main beam (at 0 degrees); atthe 30 dB point, it is 1/1,000th of the maximum. Figure 1. Kathrein 800-10504 Antenna -Vertical-plane Emission Pattern Odeg hodzon 5 dB / division As noted at the outset, there are existing antenna operations to include in the compliance assessment. For each of the cellular carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power. For the other operator, we will rely on the parameters in its FCC license. ^T&T is licensed to operate in both the 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as nine RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as three RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. Nextel is licensed to operate in the 851 MHz frequency band. There is a maximum of 12 RF channels in each sector, and each channel is set for maximum of 100 watts of effective radiated power (for which the equivalent antenna input power is less than six watts). We recognize that Nextel is involved in transitioning its service to the 935 MHz band, but the transmission parameters will be the same, and performing the analysis at 851 MHz, which is subject to a slightly lower MPE limit, is conservative. Keyspan Corporation is licensed to operate in both the 150 MHz and 450 MHz frequency bands. In the 150 MHz band it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 100 watts. In the 450 MHz band, it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 75 watts. FCC licensing records show the Town of Southold is licensed to operate in the 450 MHz band, with a maximum transmitter power of 15 watts. Mathematical Compliance Analysis FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 (~OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest - and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach. The FCC's formula for street-level compliance assessment for any given wireless antenna operation is as follows: MPE% = (100 * TxPower * 10 (Gmax-VdisC/lO) * 4 ) ! ( MPE * 4~ * R2 ) where MPE% = 100 = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public factor to convert the raw result to a percentage 7 TxPower 10 (Gmax-Vdisc/10) 4 MPE R = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (22 = 4) = FCC general population MPE limit = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 2 below. height from antenna bottom to 6.5' above ground level antenna 0 ~, 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 2. MPE% Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level - which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represent non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas and sectorized coverage arrangements are used, the compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single (facing) sector, as the RF effects of directional antennas facing generally away are insignificant. Based on FCC guidelines, the following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power and maximum channel capacity - and the power-attenuation effects referred to antenna line loss are ignored wherever possible. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "perfect" field reflection from the ground itself. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur - and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operator, with the worst-case (maximum) result highlighted in bold in the last column. As indicated, the worst-case calculated result is 0.4200 percent of the FCC MPE. A graph of the calculation results, shown on the next page below the table, perhaps provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. As might be expected with such Iow calculated RF levels, the line representing the results d above the graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. lo Town of Total Ground MetroPCS AT&T Nextel Keyspan Southold MPE% Dist (fi) MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% 0 0,0208 0.0112 0.0008 0.0024 0.0004 0.0356 20 0.0156 0.0200 0.0008 0.0258 0.0011 0.0633 40 0.2979 0.0242 0.0009 0.0673 0.0027 0.3930 60 0.0943 0.0357 0.0006 0.0854 0.0032 0,2192 80 0.1033 0.0328 0.0053 0.0882 0.0094 0.2390 100 0,1191 0.0361 0.0090 0.0150 0.0020 0.1812 120 0.0662 0.1334 0.0025 0.0409 0.0059 0.2489 140 0.0698 0,2590 0.0047 0.0810 0.0055 0.4200 160 0.0425 0.1563 0.0320 0.1054 0.0036 0,3398 180 0.0778 0.9438 0.0547 0.1031 0.0019 0.2813 200 0.0958 0.0128 0.0541 0.0868 0.0009 0.2594 220 0.0498 0.0507 0.0356 0.0758 0.0031 0.2150 240 0.0283 0.1406 0.0149 0.0890 0.0096 0.2824 260 0.0435 0.1672 0.0014 0.0845 0.0122 0,3088 280 0.0630 0.1671 0.0051 0.0665 0.0103 0.3120 300 0.0733 0.1385 0.0116 0.0343 0.0055 0.2632 320 0.0688 0.0905 0,0202 0.0242 0.0036 0.2073 340 0.0537 0.0809 0.0362 0.0267 0.0035 0.2010 360 0.0366 0.0447 0.0367 0.0475 0.0062 0.1717 380 0,0330 0.0217 0.0357 0.0681 0.0085 0.1670 400 0.0224 0.0189 0.0325 0.0859 0.0100 0.1697 420 0.0183 0.0173 0.0277 0.0996 0.0103 0.1732 440 0.0168 0.0327 0.0197 0.1058 0.0090 0.1840 460 0.0154 0.0300 0.0117 0.0974 0.0083 0.1628 480 0.0187 0.0620 0.0108 0.1008 0.0065 0.1988 500 0.0172 0.0573 0.0046 0.0934 0.0061 0.1786 120 ~., 100 80 (~ 40 O ¢ 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS Normalized FCC MPE Limit - Total MPE% Results 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (fi) 11 Compliance Conclusion The FCC MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and completely safe. As described, the analysis in this case shows that the conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is only 0.4200 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level from all the antennas at the site is more than 235 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. Certification It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 etseq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 12 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the antenna emissions at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RF exposure. Chief Technical Officer Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC 7/2/09 Date 13 AppEndix A: Background on the FCC MPE Umit FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Pretection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community - notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions - and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the generel public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 14 Frequency Range (F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) ( mWlcm; ) ( mW/cm~ ) 0.3 - 1.34 100 100 1.34 - 3.0 100 180 / F2 3.0 - 30 900 / F2 180 / F2 30 - 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F / 300 F / 1500 1,500- 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mW/cra2) 100 5.0 1.0 0.2 I I I r I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 Frequency (MHz) Occupational General Public ~ I 1,500 100,000 Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 15 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. FCC References 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part I (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 22 (Public Mobile Services). 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 24 (Personal Communications Services). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (W-I- Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, "Questions and Answers About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition 4, August 1999. 16 Appendix B: Summary of Expert Qualifications Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis: · 37 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure · Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 12,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 · Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,200 times since 1997 · Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as ~b~ the FCC Education: · B.E.E., City College of New York (Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 · M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 · Bronx High School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: · Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: · Edwards & Kelcey, VP - RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 · Bellcore, Executive Director - Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 · AT&T (Corp. HQ), Director - Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 · AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor - Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RF Safety/ · Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: · Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG · VVhile at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure · Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and other consulting / engineering firms Other Background: · Author, Microwave System Engineering (AT&T, 1974) · Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993) · National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA) - former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 · Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and Intemational Who's Who in Information Technology ~ · Published more than 35 articles in industry ma~lazines ~ 17 SUBSOIL INVESTIGATIONS SOILMECHANICS 3770 MERRICK R0,AD · SEAFORD, L. I., NEW YORK 11783 (516) 221-2333 FAX (516] 221-0254 January 25, 2010 K M CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 32 West Upper Ferry Road Ewing, NJ 08628 Att: Linda J. Bailey Dear Ms. Barley: Re: 130 Ft. Self Supported Triangular Tower 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY Our Job #10-040 Forwarded herewith are copies of the log for drilling work completed at the above referenced site. One (1) test boring was drilled to a depth of 27 feet in an effort to provide the soil characteristics at the site. A 2" diameter, 2'0" long split spoon sampler was advanced into the subsurface by the use of an automatic 140 lb. hammer with a 30" drop. From the drops of the hammer, blow counts required to advance the split spoon sampler over each 6" interval were recorded and are shown on the boring logs. Split spoon samples were taken every 5 feet thereafter to the fmal depth. Our investigation revealed that the area drilled is blanketed by 3 feet of fill, underlain, generally, by a moderately dense to dense, coarse to fmc sand formation with traces of silt and gravel extending to the deepest depth drilled. Natural ground water was encountered at a depth of 14'4" below existing grade at the time the boring was taken. All soils below the fill will satisfactorily support foundation loads of 2 tons per square foot and exhibit excellent drainage characteristics. With respect to seismic, the site is classified as Category "D" according to the International Building Code (IBC) and New York State Building Code. TEST BORINGS · GROUND WATER DETERMINATIONS · FOUNDATION RECOMMENOATIONS · HOLLOW STEM AUGER BORINGS ISOIL MECHANICS ;3770 MERRICK ROAD · SEA~ORO, L I., NEW YORK 11783 (516) 22%2333 . FAX~516) 221-0254 K M CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Att: Linda J. Bailey January 25, 2010 Page 2 Frost penetration in this area is 3 feet. All exterior foundations should have a minimum of 3 foot of cover. The angle ofintemai friction of the natural sand is 34°. Soil samples recovered during drilling operations will be stored in our lab for a period of 30 days after which they will be destroyed. During this period we will deliver these Samples to any prescribed location upon request. If after you examine the enclosed you have any further questions, please feel fxee to call and discuss them with us. Billing is enclosed. CV:mlf Encls. SO~ORP. ~a~l Vernick / President STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT for MTM Southold Police Station NY7315 MTM No. 09MPSTS008 KMCE Project No.: 090507.00 130 Ft. Self-Supported Triangular Tower Southold, New York Prepared By: K~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 32 West Upper Ferry Rd, Ewing, NJ 08628 Ph: (609) 538-0400 Fax: (609) 538-8858 July 8, 2009 (rev. I - Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2 - July 9, 2010) (rev. 3- August 3, 2010) (rev. 4 - August 25, 2010) Prepared to TINEIA-222-F June 1996 Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 3 2.0 TOWER INVENTORY ................................................................................................ 4 3.0 COMMENTARY. ......................................................................................................... 5 4.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE ......................................................................................... 6 5.0 TOWER ANALYSIS RESULTS ................................................................................. 7 5.1 FOUNDATIONS ................................................................................................. 8 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 9 7.0 APPENDIX ............................................................................................................... 10 Load Case No. 1: Existing Conditions w/proposed MetroPCS antenna and coax MT: SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION -VS-13-28 July 8, (rev. 1 - Dec. 14, 200.~ (rev. 2 - July 9, 20 (rev. 3 - August 3, 20', (rev. 4 - August 25, 20' 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Structure Owner/Manager: Southold Police Department Location: Southold Police Station 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY Manufacturer: Forth Worth Tower Equipment Existing tower inventory and the proposed installed equipment are detailed in Section '0 "Tower Inventory." Synopsis The existing tower superstructure with the installation of proposed equipment will meet current TIA standards. Load Case No. 1: The existing tower superstructure with the addition of (6) antenna and (12) cables. The foundation is at 216% which does not meet the present standards. The tower is 91.9% - End of Executive Summary - 2.0 TOWER INVENTORY MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION - VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 - Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2 - July 9, 2010) (rev. 3 - August 3, 2010) (rev. 4 -August 25, 2010) DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION *proposed (6) Metro PCS antenna @ 90' AGE 4 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION -VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 - Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2 - July 9, 2010) (rev. 3 - August 3, 2010) (rev. 4 - August 25, 2010) 3.0 COMMENTARY Our scope of work is to determine if the existing structure is capable of withstanding additional stresses/forces imposed by the installation of the proposed equipment noted in the tower inventory. Tower drawings were not available. Information obtained from a tower climb were utilized in this analysis. All members were assumed to be installed as per manufacturers specifications and are in like-new condition. Foundation drawings were also not available. KMCE previously conducted non-destructive investigation to determine the size of foundation. The findings were utilized in this analysis. The following report will provide analytical calculations and commentary regarding the capacity of the existing tower and subsequent recommendations. MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION - VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 - Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2 - July 9, 2010) (rev. 3 -August 3, 2010) (rev. 4 - August 25, 2010) 4.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. carried out their structural analysis by correlating field inspection and tower member data into proprietary software designed specifically for communication tower analysis. These programs run in conjunction with the guidelines set down in the TIA/EIA-222-F June 1996 Standard entitled "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures." The existing tower is analyzed by placing wind forces on the structure in 30° positional increments around the tower (ie. wind pressure directly onto the tower corners, faces and parallel to the faces). This enables the user to "create" a three-dimensional representation, yielding results for worst case scenarios. In effect, the production of these results allows the user to study the structural integrity of the tower when influenced by wind forces from any direction. The proceeding report includes analysis for the tower with the addition of antenna in the scenarios stated. For clarity, the analysis shall include worst case loadings and a typical elevation view with maximum foundation loads tabulated. Should the client require to be furnished with a full copy of our analysis, we will gladly do SO. Codes and Standards ACI - American Concrete Institute - Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACl 318-95), 1995 AISC - American Institute of Steel Construction - Manual of Steel Design, Allowable Stress Design, 9th edition, 1989 TIA - Telecommunications Industry Association - TIA/EIA-222-F Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, 1996 IBC 2006 6 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION -VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. I - Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2 - July 9, 2010) (rev. 3 - August 3, 2010) (rev. 4 - August 25, 2010) 5.0 TOWER ANALYSIS RESULTS The tower was analyzed for the existing inventory plus the proposed loading condition. Structural wind speed and ice loads are in accordance with the TINEIA-222-F Code. The applicable design values for Suffolk County, New York is: 85 MPH, with no ice applied to the tower members and 74 MPH, ½" radial ice applied to the tower members. For Load Case 1, Section Capacity Tables indicating the allowable member and connection capacities are included in the Appendix. All allowable capacities have been calculated to comply with the permitted TIA allowable increases (for wind). All bolts loaded in shear assume the threads are included in the shear plane. Load Case No. 1: The existing tower superstructure with addition of (6) antenna, (12) coax will meet current EINTIA design standards. The tower is 91.9%. However, the foundation is a 216%. See included "Section Capacity Tables." 7 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION -VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 - Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2 - July 9, 2010) (rev. 3 - August 3, 2010) (rev. 4 - August 25, 2010) 5,1 FOUNDATIONS The loads generated from the analysis were compared to the calculated foundation capacity. Foundation capacity was determined by KMCE using non-destructive testing. For details of test refer to foundation report provided by KMCE. KMCE determined the foundations to be 3'-0" diameter drilled shafts, 18'-6" from the top of concrete to bottom of concrete, with belled areas. Using these dimensions and conservative soil values, KMCE determined that the existing foundation will not adequately support the proposed installation. From our October 2003 foundation investigation, we have assigned a conservative value of 180 K in uplift for this foundation. The present reaction is 195 K which must have a SF of 2 or 390 K. Therefore the foundation is at 216%. 8 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION -VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 - Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2 - July 9, 2010) (rev. 3 - August 3, 2010) (rev. 4 - August 25, 2010) 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Further to our calculations, we conclude that the tower superstructure with the proposed installation and subsequent equipment conforms to current design standard. The foundation lacks adequate capacity to meet the current design standard. Increase foundation capacity by adding 2 each helical piles (5 plates) at 102 k per foundation. This would bring the foundation to compliance. We recommend that a geotechnical investigation be performed and that a design for reinforcing the foundation be conducted. This report was prepared from tower climb inventory and assumes that the tower was assembled per the manufacturer's specifications and that the tower members and connections are in like new condition. Please do not hesitate to contact or office with any questions or concerns regarding this report. Prepared By: Michael L. Bohlinger, PE Principal NY' License No. 075700 9 7.0 APPENDIX 10 DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING 1300fl 7001t MATERIAL STRENGTH GRADE ] Fy I Fu I GRADE I Fy ;____ .Fu~ j TOWER DESIGN NOTES 1. Tower is located in Suffolk County, New York. 2. Tower designed for a 85 mph basic wind in accordance wffh the TIA/EIA-222-F Standard. 3. Tower is also designed for a 74 mph basic wind with 0.50 in ice. 4. Oefiections are based upon a 60 mph wind. 5. Please reference the design apprurtenance loading c~art above for what is on the tower. 6. The tower picture doesn't show everything that is listed on the tower. 7. TOWER RATING: 91.9% MAX. CORNER REACTIONS AT BASE: DOWN: 240 K UPLIFT: -192K SHEAR: 27 K AXIAL 55 K ~-~ MOMENT SHEA~R/~ ~ 3261kip-ft TORQUE 9 kipoft 45K[ ~ i KM Consulting Engineers, lnc. r~' Southold Police Station I I 32 West Upper Ferry Road IP"*'~: Proposed Metmpcs goading. LC ~ Re*, ~ Ewing NJ. 08628 r: MTM ] User ] ': / Phone: (609)538-0400 ~Code TINEIA-222-F [Da":08/25/10 Isca~e: NTSI I FAX: (609) 538-8858 IP~x ........... ~1110~ LCI Rev~ e~jDla*~ ~O Eoll Leg Capacity TIAJEIA-222-F - 85 mph/74 mph 0.5000 in Ice Leg Compression (K) 500 <. Minimum 0 Maximum .> .500 0 m,m 70.00 1000 1(34 Consulting Engineers, lnc. r°~ Southold Police Station I 32 West Upper Ferry Road IP~°~t: Proposed Me~opcs Loading- LC 1 Rev [~ Ewing, NJ. 08628 Ic'~"t MTM rDra~nbY:User App'd: 1 Phone:(609)538-0400 ~code TIA/EIA-222-F IDate:08/25/10 Iscare NTSl FAX: (609) 538-8858 lPg'h: x ........ """~r~ w' .,v~,~.l[:~ "° E:31 Round Flat Feedline Distribution Chart 0' - 130' App In Face App Out Face Face A Face B Face C ;I 1003 1000 11000 70 (JO 1000 000 KM Consulting Engineers, ,n~r°b: Southold Police Station I 32 West Upper Ferry Road ]Lpr°jec~: Proposed Metropos Coadln9 - LC f Rev Ewing, NJ. 08628 Clmne MTM ID~'~ ~V: User [ a~p'dL~s~CP~ PhoP~: (609) 538-0400 /: TIA/EIA-222-F ~ale: 08/25/10 ~ x:~ara*~,o~so~Lc~P~.~/ eno E_71 Stress Distribution Chart 0' - 130' I > 100% 1 90°/°'100% I 75%-90% 1 50%'75% I < 50% Overstress 13000 Face A Face B Face C 110{x) 110o0 10 DO 1000 000 Consulting Engineers, lnc. r°b: soutoolO Police staoon { 32 West Upper Ferry Road I"'~,'~t: Proposed Mett?pcs Loa~C 1 Rev ~ Ewing, NJ. 08628 lc'.-:MTM {o~byU~r ~'": / Phone: (6~)538-~00 ~e: TINEIA-222-F }c,te 0~25/10 ~a: NTSI F~: (6~) 53~8858 IPa~ x:~, .... ~;;; ~.{~ ~ E-eI RISA Tower Job ..go Southold Police Station 26 of 27 Consulting Engineers, Inc.Project Date 32 West Upper Ferry Road Proposed Metropcs Loading - LC 1 Rev F 15:58:02 08/25/10 Ewing, NJ. 08628 Client Designed by Phone: (609) 538-0400 MTM FAX.- (609) 538-8858 User Section Elevation Size L Lo Kl/r F. A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P Pa P J? fi fi ksi in2 K K p, T7 10-0 2L2 1/2x2 1/2x3116 9.42 9.21 142.1 29.000 1.1391 9.43 33.03 0.286 Horizontal Design Data (Tension) I SeeOon Elevation Size L L, Kl/r F~ A Actual Allow. Ratio No. p po p fi fi fi ksi in: K K 15 50 -30 L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 13.50 13.17 203.1 21.600 0.9020 0.68 19.48 0.035 T6 30- l0 L2 I/2x2 I/2x3/16 15.50 15.17 234.0 21.600 0.9020 0.65 19,48 0.033 T7 10-0 L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 16.50 16.15 249.1 21.600 0.9020 0.25 19.48 0.013 Top Girt Design Data (Tension) Section Elevation Size L L, Kl/r F, A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P Pa P ft .fi fi ksi in: K K p. TI 130 - 1 l0 L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 4.01 3.76 58.0 21.600 0.9020 0.42 19.48 0.021 [ Section Capacity Table 1 Section Elevation Component Size Critical P SF*Pottow % Pass No. fi Type Element K K Capacity Fail TI 130-110 Leg 3 I -20.38 179.52 11.4 Pass Diagonal L2 1/2x2 I/2x3/16 8 4.21 16.76 25.1 Pass Top Gir~ L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 6 4).44 ]6.92 2.6 Pass T2 110-90 Leg 3 I/2 31 -54.47 213.90 25.5 Pass Diagonal L2 I/2x2 1/2x3/16 34 ~6,23 11.73 53.1 Pass 75.9 (b) T3 90- 70 Leg 3 1/2 52 -95.57 213,90 44.7 Pass 45.8 (b) Diagonal L3x3x3/16 55 -6.91 15.12 45.7 Pass 84.2 (b) T4 70-50 Leg 4 73 -136.60 319.15 42.8 Pass 78.2 (b) Diagonal L3x3x3/16 76 -7.50 11.88 63.1 Pass 91.9 (b) T5 50-30 Leg 4 95 -173.61 380.97 45.6 P~ss 75.4 (b) Diagonal 2L2 I/2x2 1/2x3/16 98 -9.26 21,41 43.3 Pass 56.2 (b) Horizontal L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 97 4),69 4.35 15.9 Pass RISA Tower Job Southold Police Station 27 of 27 KM Consulting Engineers, ln~ Project Date 32 West Upper Ferry Road Proposed Metropcs Loading - LC 1 Rev F 15:58:02 08/25/10 Ewing, NJ. 08628 Client Designed by ?hone: (609) 538-0400 umu FAX: (609) 538-8858 User Section Elevation Component Size Critical P SF*Polio~ % Pass No. ft Type Element K K Capacity Fail T6 30 - 10 Leg 4 128 -212.94 380.97 55.9 Pass Diagonal 2L2 I/2x2 I/2x3/16 ]31 -9.77 17.69 55.2 Pass 59.3 (b) Horizontal 130 -0.63 3.28 19.2 Pass T7 ]0 - 0 Leg 161 -231.02 441.99 52.3 Pass Diagonal 164 -9.72 16.22 59.9 Pass Horizontal 169 -0.22 2.89 7.5 Pass Summary 78.2 Pass 91.9 Pass 4 I/4 Leg (T4) Diagonal (r4) Horizontal (T6) Top Girt (T1) Bolt Checks RATING = 19.2 Pa~s 2.6 Pass 91.9 Pass 91.9 Pass Program Version 5.3.1.0 - 10/3/2008 File:X:/MTM/Southold/Engineering/Southold LCI Rev F.efi TOWER REINFORCEMENT DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS T-1 ST-1 ST-2 ST-5,1 ST-3,2 TITLE FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT ELEVATION HELICAL DETAILS ANODE INSTALLATION ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. SITE LOCATION: 41815 MAIN ROAD - PECONIC, NY. 11958 SCOPE: THE PURPOSE OF THESE REINFORCING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS IS TO REINFORCE THE FOUNDATION. THE FOUNDATION IS BEING REINFORCED WITH HELICALS ON ALL THREE LEGS. REINFORCING INCLUDES: THE FOUNDATION IS BEING REINFORCED WITH HELICALS ON ALL THREE LEGS. THERE WILL BE 2 HELICALS PER LEG FOR A TOTAL OF 6. THIS REINFORCEMET~IT,~-~e,'--I~.E,0,U.I~=,,,D.-~PTER ANALYZING THE TOWER, REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS DATED ~G~T ~T~I~ AND GEOTECHNICAL BY SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. DATED JAN~O, IO-040. Consulting Engineers, Inc. APPROVAL5 ~ DATE: MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. $OUTHOLD 41615 i'IAIN ROAD __ PECONICI NY. Ilq56 REVI$1ON$~ 08V25/10 TITLE SHEET MLB JSR O1/2q/lO NOTE: I. HELICAL TO BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY OR NITN A I' BATTER AHAT FROM EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK. ALSO BATTER HELICAL ANAT FROM EACH OTHER. 2. HELICAL PILES ARE TO BE A MIN. OF .4B~ DtR A HA)(. TORQUE OF 10400 FCK)T FOUNDS. ~" MIN. NILTI EPOXT BOLTS (HIT/Ih' lBO/HIT ICE A[:~IESIVE ANCHOR) NITI-I ,~" EMBEDMENT. ('MIN. OF I(~ PER pLATE). INSTALLED PER i"IANUFACTURE INSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO BACK FILL HOLE5 AND RESTORE COMPOUND TO EXISTING CONDITION. CONTRACTOR TO ADD DIRT AND SEED IT AS REOUIRED. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE SFJC~IN HELICAL ATTACHMENT TO FOUNDATION OR SUBMIT E~UAL. FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT BASED ON GEOTECJ-INICAL. REPORT BT SOIL P1EC. J-IANIC$ DRILLING CORP...~ NUMBER 10-040 DATED 2BTh JANUART~ 2010~ AND STRUCTURAL ANALTSI5 BT KM cONSULTING ENGINEERS~ INC. DATED MTN DECEMBER~ 200~. EXISTING TOWER LEG {TYP,I SACRII=ICIAL ANODE CAISSON TTP. (~)~OUNDATION REINFORCEMENT ELEV, .SCALE'. NTS ~/~HEHEL PROPOSED ICAL PILES (2 PER LEG TTP.) SQUARE BAR WITH 14", 1~I, 12", 10"~ 8" HELICES WITH A 1'BATTER 11T71 J' Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVi5 ONS: F.: DA~,__ 41~15 MAIN ROAD I ~T., DA~,~ PECONIC~ 0507 FOUND. ~EINFORCEMENT EL~ MLB JSR O1/2q/lO ~gRIND AND/OR LEVEL.~ ATTACH COAT AREA ITH $IKATOP 12~ PLUG PROPOG~D HEL]CAP P]LEG (6 TYP.I HELICAL MOUNTING DETAIL (PLAN) SCALE: 3/4"=11'0" MINIMUM ~J" HILT] EPOXY GOLTS IM]N, 16 / / · · · · ~ATTER ~ ~ GAT~ ,r /"~ UTE) NOTE: INSTALLATION SHALL BE OBSERVED BY QUALIFIED LICENSED ENGINEER PAM[LIAR WZTH HELICAL PILE INSTALLATION AND PHOTOGRAPHY/WRITTEN RECORD SUSMZTTED TO MTM DESIGN GROUP. ~6 TYP,I TO PAINT pLATE AND WELD AREA OF HELICAL WITH 2 HELICAL MOUNTING DETAIL (ELEV.) SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" b LEAD (ST~.2 HELICAL DETAIL SCALE: 3/8"-f-0" IITT"~ · Consulting Engineers, Inc. : : MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. II ~,~.__ 32 We~t U~e~ Flay Rea~ Ewlng, NJ 0~62~ ~;~,~ II ...... ~UTHOLD I~o: / i~ 115.A.C.: DATE: ~ JJ ~' H~ST., DATE, PECONI~/ NY. ]1~5~ I/ > 0q0507 HELICAL DETAILS ML~ JSR ANODE INSTALLATION WITH CADWELD CONNECTIONS TO HELICAL ANCHORS GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK THIS WORK CONSISTS OF FURNISHING ALL LABOR, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREPARATION AND INSTALLATION OF A CORROSION PROTECTION ANODE USING A CADWELD CONNECTION TO A STEEL FOUNDATION SUPPORT PRODUCT ACCORDING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN. THE WORK INCLUDES, BUT 1S NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: 1. INSTALLING THE ANODE; 2. PREPARING THE AREA OF ELECTRICAL ATTACHMENT; 3. INSTALLING THE WIRE, SLEEVE, DISK, WELD METAL AND STARTING MATERIAL TO THE CADWELD MOLD; 4. WELDING THE ANODE WIRE TO THE PRODUCT REQUIRING CATHODIC PROTECTION; 5. CLEANUP DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE HANDLED AND TRANSPORTED CAREFULLY TO PREVENT ANY DEFORMATION OR DAMAGE. THE MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED IN A COOL AND DRY LOCATION. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT THE ACCUMULATION OF DIRT OR FOREIGN MATTER ON THE MATERIALS. SUCH ACCUMULATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED PRIOR TO ANODE INSTALLATION AND CADWELDING. MATERIALS MAGNESIUM ANODE THE MAGNESIUM ANODE SHALL BE CAST OF ALLOY AZ63 TO PRODUCE AN OPEN CIRCUIT POTENTIAL OF 1.53 TO 1.55 VOLTS. THE ANODE SHALL BE CENTERED IN A COTTON BAG AND SURROUNDED WITH A MIXTURE OF 75% HYDRATED GYPSUM, 20% BENTONITE AND 5% SODIUM SULFATE. THE LEAD WiRE SHALL BE SILVER SOLDYRED TO THE CORE OF THE ANODE AND THEN FULLY SEALED AND INSULATED. THE LEAD WIRE SHALL BE A 10-FOOT LENGTH OF #12 TW INSULATED SOLID COPPER. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL SPECIFY ANODE WEIGHT FOLLOWING SOIL RESISTIVITY TESTING. CADWELD MOLD CADWELD MOLD IS USED TO ACCOMPLISH A PERMANENT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE ANODE AND THE FOUNDATION SUPPORT PRODUCT BEING PROTECTED FROM CORROSION (CATHODE). A SEMI- PERMANENT GRAPHITE MOLD SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL THE DIRECTION AND SPEED OF THE MOLTEN CADWELD METAL, AND THE FINAL SHAPE OF THE SOLIDIFIED WELD. MOLD CONFIGURATION IS RELATED TO THE SURFACE TO RECEIVE CADWELD AND TO CONDUCTOR SIZE. THE FOLLOWING MOLDS ARE DESIGNED TO ACCEPT FROM//14 TO #10 SOLID W1RE, #8 SOLID OR STRANDED WIRE, OR #6 SOLID WIRE. 3/4" TO 3-1/2" DIAMETER PIPES USE CAVST-IGA CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCORPORATEDi OR EQUAL. 4" TO 10" DIAMETER PIPES USE CAVST-IGB CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCORPORATED, OR EQUAL. 12" & LARGER DIAMETER PIPES - FLAT SURFACES USE CAVST-IG CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCORPORATED, OR EQUAL Consulting Engineers, Inc. MTM DESIGN GROUP EOUTNOLD -- 41&15 MAIN ROAD __ PECONIC, NY. Ilal~ CAi)WELD METAL CADWELD WELD METAL IS A MIXTURE OF COPPER OXIDE AND ALUMINUM, PACKAGED IN PLASTIC TUBES. EACH TUBE CONTAINS THE STARTING POWDER AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PLASTIC TUBE, WITH THE WELD METAL ON THE TOP. THE CONTAINERS ARE PACKAGED WITH METAL DISKS IN BOXES OF 20. THE CADWELD METAL CAN BE HANDLED AND STORED WITHOUT DANGER OF SPONTANEOUS IGNITION. BOXES MAY BE SHIPPED WITHOUT SPECIAL PACKAGING OR MARKING. ERICO CAI5 WITH F-33 ALLOY, OR EQUAL, SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTIONS OF CABLE TO STEEL, CABLE TO STAINLESS STEEL, OR CABLE TO CABLE. CABLE SLEEVE A TUBULAR METAL SLEEVE IS REQUIRED OVER THE #12 WIRE THAT IS SUPPLIED WITH THE ANODES TO PREVENT LOSS OF MOLTEN MATERIAL DURING THE WELDING PROCESS. THE SLEEVE IS INSTALLED OVER THE WIRE PRIOR TO INSERTION INTO THE MOLD. ERICO CABI33-1H, OR EQUAL. EXECUTION ANODE BAG INSTALLATION THE SPECIFIED SIZE AND TYPE OF ANODE SHALL BE INSTALLED NEAR THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT(S) REQUIRING CATHODIC CORROSION PROTECTION. EACH ANODE SHALL BE PLACED IN A SEPARATE EXCAVATION AND POSITIONED AT AN ELEVATION BELOW THE ANTICIPATED POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT AT A DISTANCE BETWEEN 3 AND 10 FEET FROM THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT. WELD LOCATION THE ATTACHMENT POINT SHALL BE TO THE ANCHOR SHAFT AS CLOSE TO THE TOP PIER PLATFORM, PILE CAF OR ANCHOR TRANSITION AS PRACTICAL. SURFACE PREPARATION THE POINT OF ATTACHMENT ON THE PILE SHAFT SHALL BE CLEANED TO BARE METAL BY REMOVING OIL, DIRT, RUST, GALVANIZING AND/OR PAINT ONLY IN THE AREA THAT WILL DIRECTLY RECEIVE THE WELD. THIS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY FILING, GRINDING OR ROTARY WIRE BRUSHING THE AREA. AFTER CLEANING, PROVIDE REFERENCE MARK TO AID IN ALIGNING MOLD TO SHAFT. CAUTION: FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, PAYING PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO ANY PRODUCT WARNINGS. WELDING REQUIRES A RAPID BURNING OF A STARTING POWDER THAT CREATES INTENSE HEAT. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE PERSON PERFORMING THE WELDING USE ALL RECOMMENDED SAFETY DEVICES. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMEND-ATION AND TO WEAR PROPER PROTECTIVE DEVICES COULD RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY! WELDING SELECTING THE MOLD SELECT THE PROPER SIZE MOLD FOR THE APPLICATION. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE MOLD FIT PROPERLY TO THE CURVATURE OF THE SHAFT. BEFORE THE FIRST CONNECTION OF THE DAY, DRY THE MOLD AND WARM IT USING A TORCH TO APPROXIMATELY 2500 F. INSTALL ANODE WIRE INSPECT THE WIRE TO BE SURE THAT THE CONDUCTOR IS CLEAN, DRY AND NOT DEFORMED. BENT OR DEFORMED CABLE MAY HOLD THE MOLD OPEN OR LEAK. INSTALL A CABI33-1H METAL SLEEVE OVER THE BARE #12 WIRE LEADING TO THE ANODE. ALLOW THE CONDUCTOR TO PROTRUDE 1/8 INCH BEYOND THE SLEEVE. POSITION THE WIRE AND SLEEVE IN THE WIRE SLOT IN THE MOLD ADJACENT TO THE WELD CAVITY. CLOSE THE MOLD AND LOCK TIGHTLY. Consulting Engineers, Inc. ONNER= DATE= $.A.C,= DATE= R / F.= DATE= ~3NST.= DATE: MI'M DESIGN GROUP INC. PROJECT NAME: SOUTNOLD -- 4181B MAIN ROAD PECONIC~ NY. Iiq58 INSTALL ANODE WIRE INSPECT THE WIRE TO BE SURE THAT THE CONDUCTOR IS CLEAN, DRY AND NOT DEFORMED. BENT OR DEFORMED CABLE MAY HOLD THE MOLD OPEN OR LEAK. INSTALL A CABI33-1H METAL SLEEVE OVER THE BARE #12 WIRE LEADING TO THE ANODE. ALLOW THE CONDUCTOR TO PROTRUDE 1/8 INCH BEYOND THE SLEEVE. POSITION THE W2RE AND SLEEVE IN THE WIRE SLOT IN THE MOLD ADJACENT TO THE WELD CAVITY. CLOSE THE MOLD AND LOCK TIGHTLY. INSTALL CADWELD METAL INSERT ONE METAL DISK PACKAGED WITH THE CADWELD METAL INTO THE BOTTOM OF THE CHAMBER. OPEN ONE PLASTIC TUBE CONTAINING THE WELDING METAL AND STARTING POWDER. CAREFULLY INSTALL THE LOOSE WELDING METAL ON TOP OF THE METAL DISK IN THE CHAMBER. PACKAGED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PLASTIC TUBE IS THE STARTING POWDER. CAREFULLY REMOVE THE STARTING POWDER FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE TUBE AND PLACE THE POWDER ON TOP OF THE WELDING METAL. AS AN A1D IN IGNITION, ALLOW A SMALL AMOUNT OF STARTING POWDER TO REST ON THE TOP OF THE MOLD NEAR THE IGNITION PORT. CLOSE THE TOP OF THE MOLD. IGNITION AND WELDING PLACE THE MOLD AGAINST SHAFT, CAREFULLY ALIGNING THE MOLD TO THE REFERENCE MARK(S) ON THE SHAFT. WEARING GLOVES AND EVE PROTECTION, CAREFULLY AL1GN THE MOLD AGAINST THE SHAFT DIRECTLY OVER THE AREA THAT WAS PREPARED TO ACCEPT THE CADWELD. APPLY PRESSURE AGAINST THE MOLD TO INSURE CONTACT WHILE 1GNITING THE STARTING POWDER USING AN APPROVED IGNITION DEVICE THAT IS SUPPLIED WITH THE MOLD. CONTINUE TO HOLD THE MOLD AGAINST THE SHAFT FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 SECONDS FOLLOWING IGNITION TO INSURE THAT THE MOLTEN METAL HAS SOLIDIFIED. WARNING: 1. WEAR PROTECTIVE CLOTHING, EYE PROTECTION AND GLOVES WHILE WELDING. 2. PERSONNEL SHOULD BE PROPERLY TRAINED IN THE USE OF THESE PRODUCTS. 3. MAKE SURE THAT THE PROPER MOLD IS USED TO FIT THE D1AMETER OF THE SHAFT. 4. DO NOT USE WORN OR BROKEN EQUIPMENT, WHICH COULD CAUSE LEAKAGE. 5. DO NOT ALTER OR MODIFY EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS. 6. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE V~ELD MATERIALS. 7. AVOID MOISTURE AND CONTAMINANTS IN THE MOLD AND WELD MATERIALS. 8. AVOID EYE CONTACT VVITH THE "FLASH" OF LIGHT FROM THE 1GN1T1ON OF THE STARTING MATERIAL. 9. AVOID BREATHING CONCENTRATIONS OF SMOKE, AS IT MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH. 10. PROVIDE ADEQUATE VENTILATION WHERE NATURAL AIRFLOW 1S NOT SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT PERSONNEL FROM BREATHING CONCENTRATIONS OF SMOKE. 1 I. AVOID CONTACT VVITH HOT MATERIALS. 12. ADVISE NEARBY PERSONNEL OF WELDING IN THE AREA. 13. PROTECT THE IMMEDIATE AREA FROM FIRE HAZARDS. 14. DO NOT SMOKE. MOLD REMOVAL AND INSPECTION OPEN THE MOLD AND REMOVE THE MOLD FROM THE SHAFT. CAREFULLY INSPECT THE WELD TO ENSURE THAT ALL OF THE CADWELD METAL WAS PROPERLY FORMED AROUND THE WIRE, SLEEVE AND SHAFT. THE WELD SHOULD BE UNIFORM AND FULLY PENETRATE ALL AREAS. IF THE WELD IS NOT PERFECT, REPEAT THE WELD IN AN ADJACENT AREA. Consulting Engineers, Inc. APPROVAb5 t; DATE: DATE, MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. SOUTI-IOLD 41fil5 MAIN ROAD PECONIC, NT. Iiq58 CONT. IF: I' CORROSION PROTECTION OF WELDED AREA AFTER THE WELDED AREA HAS COOLED, THE WELD, SLEEVE, WIRE AND BARE METAL ON THE SHAFT SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST CORROSION USING ANY RECOGNIZED PRODUCTS DESIGNED FOR COLD APPLICATION CORROSION PROTECTION, SUCH AS ZINC RICH PAINT (ZRC), COLD TAR EPOXY, ETC. THE ENTIRE AREA SHALL BE COATED WITH AT LEAST THREE COATS AND CAREFULLY INSPECTED TO SEE THAT THERE ARE NO GAPS, VOIDS OR THINLY COATED AREAS. CLEAN-UP REMOVE SLAG AND DUST FROM THE MOLD WITH A CLEAN RAG, PAINT BRUSH OR MOLD CLEANING TOOL. DO NOT USE A WIRE BRUSH. BACKFILL AROUND THE SHAFT AND ANODE USING SOIL THAT WAS REMOVED DURING THE EXCAVATION. DO NOT BACKFILL WITH A MATERIAL FOREIGN TO THE SITE. LEAVE THE AREA CLEAN AND FREE OF DEBRIS. GRADE FOR PROPER DRAINAGE. ]IT)"] I' Consulting Engineers, Inc. IIcb~ENT M'TM DESIGN GROUP INC. ) % I~UT~OLD ~// I1~*.' ~*~' I~PEcON~c, ~ II o,~o~o-~ II II ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. 548o~0'00"w 56.1' 177.1M/ 539.76' $~uq:q:o£qc co~u~, ~w roq~c SCTM # 1000 - 75 - 5 - 14.1 AREA = 534,371 SQ FT '12.27 ACRES 0 ~00' NOW Oil FORMERLy ~PtAINE KOKKINO$ NS$O$6'OO"E 256.09 .$4-' S4.8o39 5u MAIN I~oAD SURVEYED: OCTOBER 30,2003 JOHN GALLACHER LAND 8URVEYOR 59 FLORENCE DRIVE MANORVILLE, N.Y. 11949 ( 631 ) 874 - 0400 B-1 (EL. 99,70') GROUND SURFACE 1 BRN. SAND, TR. GRAVEL, LITFLE SILT (SP)(FILL) (HAND AUGERED) LT. SRN. SAND, TR. GRAVEL, SiLT 5 (sP) I~ / LT. BRN./ORANGE SAND, · · · ~(~0 TR. GRAVEL, SILT · · / U TAN/LT. BRN. SAND, TR. 2 (SP)(3b) · · · 15 BRN. SAND, TR. · 6~ GRAVEL, SILT · · 3 (SP)(3b) · · 20 BRN. SAND, TR. · · 4 ~ GRAVEL, SILT · · · · (SP)(3a) · · ,~m BRN. SAND, TR, · · 7~ GRAVEL, SILT · · (SP)(3b) · · · · END OF BORING 27' - 0" LIJ NOISBI CLASSIFICATION G,W,T. 14'-4" NOTES : 1. - SOIL OESCRIPTIONS ARE BY VISUAL EXAMINATION OF SOIL SAMPLES RECOVERED DURING DRILLING OPERATIONS. 2. - SOIL DESCRIPTIONS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFIED SOiL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. 3. - GROUND WATER WAS MEASURED INSIDE THE DRILL CASING AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH BOREHOLE. 4. - SOiL STRATtFICATIONS ARE ACCURATE TO WITHIN TWO FEET VERTICALLY. 5. - ELEVATIONS WERE REFERENCED TO S.M - ON CONCRETE STEPS AT BUILDING ENTRANCE. ASSUMED ELEVATION AT 100.0'. 6. - SOIL SAMPLES WERE OBTAINED USING A CENTRAL MtNE EQUIPMENT (CML) AUTOMATIC TRIP HAMMER. 0 ID 0 0 0 -- CHAIN-LINK FENCE EXISTING BUILDING × ANTENNA EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING CHAIN-LINK FENCE xl SOIL GROUPS GW GP GM UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION TYPICAL NAMES AND SOIL SYMBOLS WELL GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES. LITTLE OR NO FINES SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - SILT MIXTURE (.9(.9 CHAIN-LINK FENCE GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURE SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH. OH WELL GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, CLAYEY SILTS, SLIGHT PLASTICITY INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS SANDY CLAYS~ SILTY CLAYS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH pLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS Pt PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURES, N.Y.C. BLDG. CODE TABLE 1804.1 CLASS OF MATERIALS MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE (Notes 1 & 3) FOUNDATION PRESSURE FOUNDATION PRESSURE (TSF) (kPa) 1. BEDROCK (NOTES 2 & 7) la HARD SOUND ROCK - GNEISS, DIABASE, SCHIST 60 5,746 lb MEDIUM HARD ROCK - MARBLE, SERPENTINE 40 3,830 lc INTERMEDIATE ROCK - SHALE, SANDSTONE 20 1,915 ld SOFT RDCK - WEATHERED ROCK 8 766 2. SANDY G PJ~'E L & GRAVEL (GW, GP) (NOTES 3, 2a DENSE 10 958 2b MEDIUM S 575 3. GRANULAR SOILS (CC, GM, SW, SP~ SM, & SCNNOTES 4, 5, 8, & 9 3a DENSE 6 575 3b MEDIUM 3 287 4 CL~YS (SC, ~L, & CH)(NOTES 4, 6, 8, & g) 4a HARD 5 479 4b STIFF 3 287 4c MEDIUH 2 192 5. SILTS & SII --F SOILS (ML 5a DENSE 3 287 5b MEDIUM I 5 144 ORGANIC SILTS, ORGANIC CLAYS, PEATS, SOFT CLAYS, SEE 1804.2.1 SEE 1804.2.1 LOOSE GRANULAR SOILS, & VARVED SILTS 7~ CONTROLLED & UNCONT~ROLLE~ FILLS~ SEE 1804.2 ~ O~ ~ 804.2.3 -SEE 1804.2,2 OR 1804.2.3 COMPACTION RELATED TO SPOON BLOWS PER FOOT SAND SILT & CLAY LOOSE I t5 OR LESS SOFT I 10 OR LESS SAND MEDIUM 16 TO 39 MEDIUM 11 TO 29 PILE DE:ISE 40 OR MORE HARD 30 OR MORE "N" STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (2"SPOON, 1401b HAMMER, 30"FALL) N=17 SPOON BLOW COUNT IS GENERALLY SHOWN IN 6" INCREMENTS FOR 2' DRIVE BLOWS PER FOOT TO OBTAIN BLOWS PER FOOT (N) USE THE 2ND & 3RD 6" INCREMENT ROTARY CASING EXTRA HEAVY CASING I SAMPLE SPOON SIZES, INCHES 2.5 I 2.0 HAMMER WEIGHT, POUNDS 140 HAMMER FALL, INCHES 30 CB - CASING SLOWSPER 1 FOOT DRIVE UD - UNDISTURBED SOIL SAMPLE SB - SPOON BLOWS PER S INCH DRIVE NO - SAMPLE NUMBER P - PUS! 'ED BY WEIGHT OF HAMMER FEET - DEPTH FROM GND. SUR. NOTED AT EACH 5' THE LIABILI7'/OF SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP, ITS OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES, FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR NEGLIGF ~CE RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURIES, PROPERTY DAMAGE OR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE PAID FOR THIS REPORT. THE RETENTION OR USE OF ANY PART OF THIS REPORT WiLL CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF THIS LIMITED LIABILITY, IF THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE~ THE CLIENT MUST NOTIFY SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. IN WRITING BY CERTIFIED M~IL, WITHIN SEVEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT, THE FEE CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT IS BASED ON THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY WHICH IS THE ES- SENCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, IF THE CLIENT WANTS A HIGHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP., WILL NEGOTIATE ONE, BASED UPON A HIGHER FEE BEING CHARGED FOR THE ADDITIONAL ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITY. SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP, ITS OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES, HAVE NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBIL- ITY TO PERSONS OTHER THAN THE CLIENT FOR WHOM THIS REPORT WAS PREPAR~ED, ANYONE, OTHER THAN OUR CLIENT, RELIES ON THIS REPORT AT THEIR OWN RISK, K.M. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. #32 WEST UPPER FERRY ROAD, EWING, NEW JERSEY 08628 BORING LOCATION PLAN SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. SCALE: 1"=20'-0" subsoil investigations 3770 MERRICK ROAD * SEAFORD, NEW YORK 11783 * 516 - 221-2333 SOUTHOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT -41405 MAIN ROAD (N.Y.S. ROUTE 25) -SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION- PECONIC, NEW YORK VERTICAL BORING SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" JANUARY22 DATES OF BORING )WN. BY: CKD. BY: JANUARY 21, 2010 JMR CV DRAWING NUMBER 10R040-1 SHEET 1 OF 1. SITE INFOF~MATION: .LATITUDE= LONSlTUDE~ ¢ROUND ELEVATION= ;XISTIN~ USE: PROPOSED LOT SIZE: TOTAL LEASE N 41° Or' 2q.O0" NAD ~B hi -"/2° 2T 50.81" NAD bB [~0 5~. ~T. LIST: SHEET Z-I Z-4 TITLE SHEET RADIUS NAP ¢ 5URRoUNDIN5 INFORMATION SITE PLAN 4 ZONIN5 INFORMATION PARTIAL SITE ~ E~UIPMENT PLAN TOI~iER ELEVATION 4 DETAILS DETAILS CONTACTS: OHNER INFORMATION= .APPLICANT= ATTORNE% TOHN OF 50UTHOLD 530q5 ROUTE 25 50UTHOLD, NY II'ill PECONIC POLICE DEPARTMENT 41815 MAIN ROAD FEOONIC, NY IlqSS METRO PC5 NE~ YORK, L.L.C. 5 SKYLINE HAWTHORn, NY 10552 ER, NIELSEN, H~BER ~ ¢O~HLIN, LLP B~ NORTH NE~ YORK AVENUE HUNTIN~TO& NY 11~4~ · L. (~1) PAX. (~51) 425-4104 $COF=E OF - INSTALLATION OF - INSTALLATION OF - INSTALLATION OP - INSTALLATION OF - INSTALLATION OF - INSTALLATION OF - INSTALLATION OF COMPOUND (4) EdtUIPMENT CABINET5 ON NEH CONCRETE 5LAB. (~) PANEL ANTENNAS ON NE~ MOUNTS TO EXtSTINr= TO~ER. CABLE DRIDr~E FOR ROUTINE Co~IAL CO~[AL C~L~5 UP THE TO~R TO THE ANTENNAS. ELECTRIC AND ~L~PHONE SERVICE POR E~UIPHENT CHAIN LINK FENCE AND ACCEDE 5A~5. LANDSCAPIN5 5GREENIN5 ABOUND PROPOSED FENCED E~UIPHENT NOTES: I.) CONST~CTION TO CONFORH TO THE STANDARD5 AND SPECIFICATION5 OF THE TOHN OF SOUTHOLD. 2) THE PROPOSED coMPOUND IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY AND THEREFORE NO PAR~IN5 HA5 SEEN PEOVIDEO, ~j THE P~OPOSED HO~ILE E~UIPHENT DOE5 NOT ~E~glRE A PERHAN~NT EHPLOYEE OCCUPANCY, It I5 AN UNHANNED FAGILI~, AND THEREPO~ REQUIRE5 NO POTABLE ~ATER~ 5ANJTANY 5E~ER5 AND DOE5 NOT EE~UIRE ANY ADDITIONAL 51~ PARKINS. 4) THIS 51TE ~ILL ~E VISITED ON AN AVErAgE EVERY POU~ TO SlX ~EEK PERIOD HAINTENANCE AND 5HALL ~E HONITORED PROH A REHO~ 5.) THIS PEOPOSED 51TE ONLY ~GUi~5 ELECTRIC AND ~LEPHONE UTILITIES. CONNECTION5 5HALL ~E DETERHINED ~Y THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COHPANY UPON APPROVAL. &) 5l~ LI~HTIN~ ~ILL ~E REQUIRED. PROPOSED ~ORK LIDHT ON HANUAL TINEN 5~ITCH E~UlPHENT. ~) THESE ~IN~5 ARE ~EIN~ PREPAID POE THE PURPOSE50P HUNIDtPAL AND A~ENCY ~VIE~ AND APPROVAL. THESE DRA~IN55 5HALL NOT ~E UTILIZED POE CONST~GTION ~EPOSES, UNTIL ALL CONDITION50P APPROVAL HAVE BEEN 5ATISPIED. DATE DATE DATE DATE New York, L.L.C. SITE #: NY7315 41405 ROUTE 25 (A.K.A. 165 PECONIC LAN ) PECONIC, NY 11958 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SECTION: 75 BLOCK: 5 ZONE: R-80 LOT: 14.001 TOPOC~t~AF'N lC. MAP: TO~N OP 50UTHOLD SCALE, I"=1000' (llxll) 5CALE~ 1"=500' (22x34) I000' 1500' 2000' NEERING HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 T: 732.888.6210 F: 732.847.4335 LouMog~no, AIA ARCH~ECT NJ - # A113345 . NY-# 028992-1 Robert W, Toms, P.E. STKUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ r ~ GE 36209 NY - # 075384 Z~ Ob/lb/ID ISSUEI~ AS Pi~.ILIWIINAI~.¥S metroPCS New York, L.L.C. CLIENT PROJECT N¥-~15 F=F:~--~ONIC, N"r' 11~8 TOY,IN OF SOUTHOL:D PRAF~IN® TITLE. 500' RADIUS LINE~ / / / / / / 088 1 / 15 / / / RES 086 1 086 1 4.7 / / / / / / / / ACR 085 1 3.4 ADRICULTURAL CONSERVATION (~ ACRES) / / / / RES. 075 1 12 AOF 086 1 3.3 // SCHOOL %N" ~ 0751 13 AsR. .9 074 15 5 RESIDENTIAL LOP4 DENSITY (2 ACRES) 086 1 3.1 I / / I / / / / / I I 075 5 14.1 TOHNSHIP OF SOUTHOLD HHY ~-~.. DEPARTHENT 075 5 13 CARPET CLEANINS DUSINESS 075 5 12 VACANT LAND Pq NDO.~_~ DUSINESS 5 11 RT 25/MAIN ROAD (EXIST. SCENIC BYWAY) 086 4.29 1 RE5 086 C3 RES ~ 1 086 /' i, 41.5 / ~ ---.._._' RES ~ ' / RESIDENTIAL LOF, I 4,6 / VACANT LAND / 4.}7 RES. /"'FIRST ; CLASS RES. 975 05 RES. o.1 085 [R-SOl q 7 ~SIDENTIAL LO~ DEN51~ (2 ACRES) A®R. 086 1 9.3 075 5 O75 5 03 O75 5 04 075 07 / / / ASR 075 5 1.1 075 RES. 5 02' REC CENTER 075 1 15.2 RES RES ACR. 075 1 15.4 RESIE'~ENTIAL LO~ DENSITY (2 ACRES) CENERAL BUSINE55 075 ZONE 1 14 CAR DEALERSHIP 086 1 10.9 075 1 15.3 ASR. / D¢¢' F~AE~ IUS/ Ilxl'~ SCALE. 24xS8 SCALE: I"= I¢¢'-¢" 2OO' ~OO~ PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS JILL BLUM PO BOX 151, PECONIC~ NY 11958 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PO BOX 1179 ~ 59095 ROUTE 25, SOUTHOLDLNY 11971 LAJIBRDA LLC TOWN OF 50UTHOLD M L MAI N ROAD LLC M L MAI N ROAD LI.C JILL BLUM STEVEN SYGMAN & MARIA STELLA SAKOWIC ALICE MALINAUSI(A5 ~OPHI E ANDRADE MARl NA TSORANOSl STEVEN& ELAI NE KO KKINOS ELAI NE LATHAM DAVl D LAFRENI ERE LIL EMILY ROSE COP. EUGENE G & MARY ELLEN GRIMES ;LAMA CHARLES REV TRUST ~ERRY & BERRY LLC =HYLUS CATALANO Z&J REALITY 'B&J REALITY' RICHMOND SHORES PROP. OWNER ASSOCIATION RICHMOND SHORES PROP. OWNER ASSOCIATION DANIEL ~ BEISNER & JEANEEN WILLIAM & KARRIANN 5EI FERT, GEORGE & MARGURERITE DENGEL 53 NORTHWEST DR NORTHPORT NY 11768 PO BOX 1179 / 53095 ROUTE 25, SOUTHOLD~ NY 11971 5COYf DESIMONE / MELISSA J HYATr-DESI MONS THOMAS D. GRAITAN JR. 770 PARK AVE UNIT 1SA, NEW YORI(~ NY 10021 770 PARK AVE; UNIT 18Ar NEW YORK, NYt0021 PO ROX 151, PECONIC, NY 11958 PO BOX 121, PECONIC~ NY 11958 PO BOX 17R~ PECONIC, NY 11958 PO BOX 13 / 585 PECONIC LANE¢ PECONICr NY 11958 PO BOX 3 / 505 PECONIC LANE, PECONIC, NY 11958 PO BOX 229, PECONIC~ NY 11958 PO BOX 264~ PECONIC~ NY 11958 )10 TUTHIL[ ROAD EXT, 50UTHOLD, NY 11971 ¢,1965 RT 25, PECONIC¢ NY 11958 ql70S RT 25 / PO BOX 503, PECONIC~ NY 11958 15 PRINCE'S PINE RD, NORWALI(~ CT 06850 415R5 RT 25~ PECONIC~ NY 11958 45 DOUD STREET, FARMINGDALE~ NY 11735 PO 80X 198, PECONICr NY 11958 PO BOX 198. P£CONIC~ NY 11958 PO BOX 273, PECONiC~ NY 11958 PO BOX 273¢ PECONICt NY 11958 PO BOX 292 / 315 RICHMOND LANE, PECpNIC, NY 11958 345 RICHMOND LANE, PECONIC~ NY 11958 350 RICHMOND LANE~ PECONIC~ NY 11958 GREGORY C WESTERLUND 41640 RT 25, PECONIC~ NY 11958 ADOLPH WESTERLUND & THERSA A, 41700 RT 25, PECONIC~ NY 11958 41780 RT 25, PECONIC, NY 11958 PELLEGRINI PECONIC LLC PELLEGRINI PECONIC LLC PO BOX 465, PECONICr NY 11958 23005 RT 25, CUTCHOGUE~ NY 11935 23005 RT 25, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ZIP PECONIC WELLS LLC 717 5TH AVE: FLOOR 19, NEW YORK ,NY ~0022 HERODOTUS DAMIANOS 591-A RiCYCLE PATH~ PT. JEFFERSON~ NY 1~776 NOTE: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OHNER INFORNATION ,/'lAS UPDATED ON JULY 12, 2OIO FROM TOIA,N OF SOUTHOLD TAX RECORDS ~F~F?,OF~E~TY OLUNEFRS LIST SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 24.x86 SCALE: VICINITY/ t<,EY IMAF~ 400' ESI -u ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 T: 732.888.6210 F: 732.847.4335 -- APPROVED BY BOARD LouMog~no, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-#AI13345 . NY - ~ 028992-1 JRobertW. Toms, P.E. 8T~UCTURALENGINEeR NJ- #GE36209 NY-~ 075384 z~ 9q/02/IO RE-ISSUED AS P~ILINIINARYS z~ ~5/15/IO ISSUED AS PRILIh-tlNAR'r"S metroPCS New York, L.L.C. CLIENT PROJECT N'r'TDID I2 ~AIail N® TITLE. RADIUS NAP ¢ SURROUNDIN® I N1-- ©t;~-.i--d.^.T I ON SHEET NUNIIDE r~: plvio ~ ~ATE: J 08/18/10 OqiViPST$O08 ZONING INFOF MATION ITEM RE~UI RED MIN. lOT AREA 80,000 MIN. LOT IAIIDTH IqD qlN. LOT DEF~TH 250 PT hdlN.FRONT YARD 5ETBAOK (ANTENNA) I00 PT. MIN. FRONT YARD SETBAO~ (EQUIPMENT) IOO FT. MIN. SIDE YARD SETDAC.,K ONE .20'FT. 'ANTENNA) TOTAL 45' MIN. SIDE YARD 5ETDAC.,K ONE 20' FT. 'EQUIPMENT) TOTAL 45' PT. MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (ANTENNA) "/5'PT. EXISTIN® 56q,442.1'1 B.P. SEq..16 FT. IO20.4.1 FT. N/A qI.O FT. N/A N/A 12.25 PT. 16.55 FT. N/A PROPOSED EQUIPi'dENT NO C.,HAN®E NO CHAN®E NO CHAN®E IOI2.'15 FT. q88.8~ PT. 6q.D FT. 458.~1 FT. q4.8~ PT, 420,41 PT. 20.I FT. 50,8'1 FT. 5.qB% q2.2D ET - TOP OF ANTENNA "fiN. REAR YARD SETBACK-, 'E~UIPi'dENT) '.15' PT. IO.O PT. MIN. LANDSCAPE AREA 2.5% 8.68% MAX. lOT COVEf~-.A®E 20% 5.q1% i'4AX. BUILDIN5 HEISHT / STOP-,lEE 35 PT. / 2 I/2 145 PT - EXISTIN® ADDITIONAL Rt~<2UIRENENT¢ FOR 60HMi~NICATION¢ TOHER, PER TO~tNBHIP CODE ARTICLE X¥11, CECTtONB 2¢0-¢1 - 2¢0-~1, A~ A~ ~OLLOH5: ~AX. H~I~H% ~O PT. 145 PT. ~ ~2'-~" MAX. E~UIPHENT AREA 500 5~. PT. N/A 150 5~. PT. KEY: ~ EXISTING NON-CONFOrMITY N/A NON APPLICABLE - NO BOUNDARY SURVEY HAS F,ERPORHED. - BOUNDARY INFORHATION 15 APPROXIHATE AND TAKEN FROH THE EOLLO!dlN5: - A DRAINING TITLED SITE PLAN, F,REPAF',ED BY JOHN GALLACHER DATED OCTOBER DO, 2003. - A DRAHING TITLED SITE F,LAN, F,REF,ARED FOR NEXTEL COHHUNIOATIONS BY HILLIAN F. COLLINS A.I.A. ARCHITECTS, 1212 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SETAUKET, NY I1'1~ DATED ID/DC/qB. - SITE HEASUREHENTS TAKEN BY THE H'TH DESIGN DROUF, INd.,. AT SITE VISIT ON 4.14.oq LO%3.2 SECTION, 056 BLOCK. I LOT: 31 N Il' IO' OO" £ ILOT: 4.2q LOT: 6.1 LOT: ~ q4.DB' SIDE TO pROPERTy LI 6~.~, SI'-'"' 5ETBA..-,- ~, ~ YARD ANTENNA ~_r~ (pRoPOsED 5ETBAcK?ffk-- YARD AN~NNA ~_ ROP05 "~E~ LIN~J LOT: 15 LOT: I EXISTING BUILDING SECTION: O'15 BLOCK: D LOT: 14.1 SID/o;Ap~D SET, AcK OUND TO pROPERTy LINE) 25&Oq, LOT: 2 ~LOT. D ~ LOT:, 4 LOT:5 .OT: & LOT: _LOT: MAIN LOT: ~44.54' ' ~ ' ~ '2F¢. '4'6r 0~"'~1 / '~ '~' / LOT I~ / ~ EXISTING BUILDIN® ~,,,~,, ROAD 5 LOT: SITE GECTION: 086 BLOCK. I LOT: q.I Ilxl'~ SCALE: I" = IS®'-O" 24xDb SCALE. I" qB'-®" LOT: IO ~ LOT: 15.2 LOT: 15.4 14 DESIGN° GROUP5 P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 T: 732.888.6210 F: 732.847.4335 APPROVED BY " TOWN Lou Moglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ - # Al 13345 NY - ~ 028992-1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - # GE 36209 NY - # 075384 Z~Oq/02/lO RE-ISSUED AS PRILINflNARYS z~Ob/IbfiO iSSUED AS PRILIMINAP-.YS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION CLIENTi metroPCS New York, L.L.C. ~,LIENT PROJECT :~, NY'TDID TOP, IN Of= SOUTHOLD IDRA~INB TITLE: '"---. ~ ITl t=:~1 ./x-,N ~ ZONIN® I NFOt~I',dATI ON DRA!NN BY': ~HEET NUMBER. OHE~KE~P BY': OD/ID/lO MTM PROJECT OqMPSTSO08 i , SEP I 0 : ' 2010 KEY NOTES~ I~= ROUTED OVERHEAD FROM PROPOSED ELECTRIC EXISTING UTILITY POLE #25q TO NEFI METRO PCS POLE IN COMPOUND ~-- GROUND TO PROPOSED 6ROUND RIN6 AROUND NE~ EQUIPMENT ~= FROM EXISTIN6 EXISTIN~ TELCO NOTE, ANY DISPLACED SOIL FOR PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF METRO PCS EQUIPMENT MUST REMAIN ON SITE AND GAN NOT BE REMOVED FROM PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTINO EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED METRO PCS PANEL ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, 0 TOTAL) ON NEFf ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMEs MOUNTED TO EXISTING TO,dER LEGS (SEE 2/Z-4 FOR DETAILS) EXISTING 131'-0" HIGH SELF SUPPORTIN® LATTICE TO,dER INCa EQUIPMENT SHELTER iI I AT¢T Il --) i NEXTEL VERIZON EXISTING EQUIPHENT SHELTER (BY OTHERS) TING PROPANE TANK NERATOR T-MOBILE EXISTING CBC CABINET EXISTIN® UTILITY POLE ~2Sq PROPOSED HETRO PCS EQUIPMENT CABINETS ("PCP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON NEFf STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO PROPOSED IO'x14' CONCRETE SLAB (15'xl2'=180 SQ, FT. LEASE AREA) PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SCREENING AROUND METRO PC5 FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, I0'+/- HIGH ARBORVITAE'5 OR APPROVED EQUAL (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-4) (1]- )PA TIAL SITE PLAN Ilxl'/ SCALE~ 1"--3¢'-¢" 24x¢6 SCALE: I"= IS'-¢" EXISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) EXISTIN® EQUIPMENT COMPOUND (BY OTHERS) EXISTING 131'-6" HIGH SELF % SUPPORTINO LATTICE TO,dER PROPOSED METRO PCS PANEL ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON NEFf ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOFIER LEGS (SEE 2/Z-4 FOR DETAILS) PROPOSED METRO PCS COAXi'AL CABLES ROUTED UP TO,dER ON CABLE LAPPER EXISTING ACCESS GATE PROPOSED METRO PCS COAXIAL, CABLES ROUTED ALONG NE'd CABLE BRID~E PROPOSED METRO PC5 6P5 UNIT MOUNTED TO CABLE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST (SEE DETAIL )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( . )( 15'-0" CHAIN LINK FENCE 14'-0" CONCRETE SLAB EXISTING O' HISH CHAIN LINK FENCE ,d/ BARBED ,dIRE PROPOSED TELCO ROUTED UNDER--- EXISTING SURFACE FROM EXISTING CBC CABINET TO PROPOSED COMPOUND (VERIFY FILTH TOFIN REQUIREMENTS) PROPOSED ELECTRIC ROUTED OVERHEAD FROM EXISTING UTILITY POLE ~2S'=1 TO NE,d METRO PCS POLE IN COMPOUND PROPOSED UTILITY POLE INSTALLED IN NE,d COMPOUND, TO BE COORDINATED FILTH UTILITY COMPANY PROPOSED METRO PCS 6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE FILTH BARBED ,dIRE AT TOP PROPOSED METRO PCS EQU CABINETS (TYP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON NEFf STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB (180 SQ. FT. LEASE AREA) PROPOSED 4'-0" FIIDE ACCESS 6ATE FILTH BARBED FIIRE AT TOP (TYP. OF 2), SAFETY SIGN NOTICE TO BE PLACED ON FENCE (SEE DETAILS 2 ¢ ~/Z-S) "0 PROPOSED METRO PCS FTC CABINET HITH LISHT ON POST PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SCREENIN6 AROUND METRO PCS FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, 10%/- HISH ARBORVITAE5 OR APPROVED EQUAL (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-4) EQUIPMENT PLAN Ilxl'~ SCALE: 5/16" r-o" 24x~6 SCALE: 3/8" ILS" © © DESIGNu GROUP z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 T: 732.888.6210 F: 732.847.4335 APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1Moglino, ~ Robert W. T~s, P.E. ARCHITECT S~UCTUEAL Lou Moglino, AIA NJ - # Al 13345 . NY - # 028992-1 NJ - !~ GE 36209 NY - ~ 075384 /~9q/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINAP.¥S ~% 95/15/10 ISBUBZ~ AS P~ILIMINAR%S REVISION ~EV, ~ATE DESCRIPTION CLIENT, metroPCS New York, L.L.C. M Id'O~ F~OUITF: 2~ F=F:~-ONI~--~, N"r" I lca'~ TOF'.IN OF: SOUTHOLD F:%/',.F~Li I.A.I , C, ITF= ~ FC:;~UIPi',-'iFWT F~I AN OATE. O8/18AO OqNIPSTSQ05 SHEET NU~BER~ ~TOP OF EXISTING NEXTEL HHIP ANTENNAS 1~5'-o" -+ A~o~ GR~DE - EXISTIN® SUPER STATIONMASTER ANTENNA FOUNDATION MODIFluATIONS TO TOUR MUST BE COMPLETED PR OR TO ADDING ANY E(2UIFMENT TO THE EXISTINCa TOHER. J EXISTING NEXTEL HHIP ANTENNAS (TYPICAL OF 3) TOP OF EXISTING TO!dER ~ CENTER OF EXISTING PANEL ANTENNAS (AT, T) ISO'-O" + ABOVE GRADE HIDTH OF TOHER 4'-O" AT TOP ~.C.E, NTTE, R OF EXISTIN® ANTENNAS (T-iqODILE) US-O~-~ E~9~ ~ASE - EXISTING POLICE HHIP ANTENNAS ~CENTER OF EXISTING ANTENNAS (VERIZON) ICTO'-O"-J: ABOVE GR~O~ ~i~_TOFP ~F PROP. METRO PCS ANTENNAS ~12'-~ ABOVE GRADE ~E?TER OF PROP. METRO PCS ANTENNAS PROPOSED METRO PC5 PANEL ANTENNAS('Pr'P. OF 2 PER SECTOR, 6 TOTA~ ON NEH ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES MOUNTED TO EXISTINCa TOHER LECa, EXISTINCa ANTENNA5 TO BE REMOVED EXISTING 1~1'-6" NIGH SELF SUPPORTING LATTICE TO~ER PROPOSED METRO PCS COAXIAL CABLES ROUTED UP ToHER ON CABLE LADDER -EXISTING BEACON LlcaHT NOTE~ ALL EXISTINCa ANTENNAS ON TOHER MAY NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THIS VIEH AND MAY NOT BE SHOHN FOR CLARITY; REFERENCE THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT FOR ACTUAL TOHER LOADINCa, EXISTINCa AND PROPOSED. PROPOSED METRO PCB COAXIAL CABLES ROUTED ALONCa NEH CABLE BRIDCaE(SEE DETAIL 4/Z-5) PROPOSED METRO PCS CaPS UNIT MOUNTED TO CABLE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST (SEE DETAIL S/Z-4) PROPOSED METRO PCS 12'-0"xl5'-0" FENCED 60MPOUND HITH PROPO3ED METRO PCS 6'-0" MICAH 6HAIN LINK FENCE NTH BARBED HIRE AT TOP (SEE DRAHINCa 2/Z-3 FOR DETAILS) PROPOSED UTILITY POLE INSTALLED IN NEH COMPOUND, TO COORDINATED HITH UTILTY COMPANY EXISTING EQUfPi'4ENT SHELTER EXISTING 6~ HIGH CHAIN LIN~ FENCE H/BARBEID HIRE EXISTINO ~' HHIP ANTENNA EXISTINCa HHIP ANTENNA DY-O"-} ABOVE GRADE NOTE~ EXISTING SPRINT/NEXTEL E~UIPMENT AREA NOT SHOHN FOR CLARITY. HIDTH oF TO!/~R F'/'-O" AT DASI~ EXISTIN® E~UIPHENT SHELTER (BY OTHERS) -- EXISTINCa TOb, ER FOUNDATION, MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED, SEE NOTES THIS SHEET. APPROX GRADE EXISTING EQUIPMENT-- SHELTER (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED LANDSOAPINCa SCREENINCa -- AROUND METRO PCS FENCED Ec2UIPMENT COMPOUND, I0' HlcaH +/- ARBORVITAES OR (SEE DETAIL PROPOSED ELEOTRI6 SERVICE TEL60 ROUTED UNDER EXISTING SURFACE TO PROPOSED COMPOUND PROPOSED METRO PCS Ed~UIPMENT CABINETS -- (TYP. OF 2) MOUNTED ON STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO CONCRETE SLAB (180 5~2. FT. LEASE AREA) NOf TN Jl×l~ SCALE: 24x5~ SCALE: AS PER A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARED BY KM CONSULTING ENCalNEERS, INC. S2 HEST UPPER FERRY ROAD, EHINCa, NJ 08628,(MICHAEL L. BOHLINGEK PE NY LICENCE ~ 015100) DATED JULY 8, 200ci, LAST UPDATED AUGUST 2~, 2010 (REV 4) FROM KM REPORT PREPARED FOR MTM DESICaN GROUP, INC. P.O. BOX D NAZLET, NJ 0"/"'/~0, THE DESBN FOR THE EXISTINCa 130'-0" HIGH LATTIC~ TOHER LOCATED IN PECONIC (TOHN OF SOUTHNOLD), NEH YORK, SUFFOLK COUNTY MEETS Tile REC2UIREMENTS OF TIA/EIA-222-F FOR AN 'N MPH FASTEST-MILE I~IIND SPEED HITH I/2" OF RADIAL ICE HITH 25% HIND LOAD REDUCTION FOR THE PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFICaURATION. THE FOUNDATION REACTIONS, HITH THE PROPOSED LOADINCa CONFICaU~ATION, HERE FOUND TO BE CaREATER THAN THE CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING FOUNDATION DESIGN. THEREFORE MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE TOHER FOUNDATION. A SEPARATE SET OF DRAHINGS AND PETALS ARE PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. TOLUEf ELEt/ATION I' EXISTING 161'-6" HIGH SELF SUPPORTING LATTICE TOHER PROPOSED METRO PCS PANEJ ANTENNAS(TYP. OF 2 PER SECTO~ 6 TOTAL) ON ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES HOUNTED TO EXlSTINCa TOHER LEG ~EE DETAIL 4~-~ BRACKET PLA'rE pROf~OSED~ MOUNTING MAST GROUND DAR B20' SECTOR 180' BETA SECTOR ANTENNA OF IENTATION II×F/ SCALE: N.T.5. 24x~ SCALE: N.T.B. 80' ALPHA SECTOR S" ~ PRO POSED ~/ caps UNIT ADJUSTMENT I-I/4"¢ sch. 40 x 18" L& MIN SS OR CaALV. PIPE PLATE I/4 x 4-1/4 x 1~-1/4" L& CaALV.(A40 STD. U-BOLT FOR 2'¢ PIPE H/DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND HASHER, CaALV. STD. U-BOLT FOR 2"¢ PIPE k~ DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND HASHEK CaALV. (SEE NOTE S) ( GPS ANTENNA I1×1! SCALE= I/2" I'-¢" 2¥xB¢ SCALE. I" = I'-®" ETAIL PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA: KATHREIN MODEL NO. 86¢-16564 FRONT ¥1ELU SIDE vi EI,,U ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS Ilxlq SCALE: I/2" : I'-¢" 24xDO SCALE, I" : I'-®" DESIGN© GROUP5 P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 T: 732.888.6210 F: 732.847.4335 APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD I I LouMoghno, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-~AI13345 NY-# 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E.v.; / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - ~ GE 36209 NY - ~¢ 075384 Z~ Oq/02/IC RE-ISSUED AS PRILlivIINARYS z~Ob/I5/IC ISSUED AS PI~.ILIMINAI~.'r'S REVISION ~EV DATE DESCRIPTION CLIENT; metroPCS New York, L.L.C. CLIENT PROJECT I,d' O~ f::~..OUTr- "~ F'FC..ONIC., N'r' I1~::, TOI/NN OF: SOUTHOLD TITLE. T=L/',.N ,~ DRAI/qN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE' OD~ID~lO oqNPSTSOOD PROPOSED 8" THICK 4000 PSt CONCRETE SLAB 2 LAYERS OF &x~-8/6 HELDED HIRE FABRIC. SEE PLANS FOR PAD SIZE (TOP TO BE LIGHTLY BRUSHED) PROPOSED CHAMFERED APPROX. FINISH GRADE 4" THICK LAYER OF S/4" DIA. CRUSHED STONE BASE EXISTING UNDISTURBED VIRGIN SOIL metroPCS Site NY7315 Network Operation Center 24/7 accessline-l-866-672-6727 O? NOTE: I. 51GM 5HALL BE MOUNTED ON EXTERIOR 51DE OF FACILITY DOOR. 2. MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE 5'-0" ABOVE 5ILL TO CENTERLINE OP 5leN. o . 0%\ RED BACKGROUND NOTiCET ~~ HHITE LETTE~5]~; ~RAPHIOD RADIO FREQUENCY ANTENA8 AT J ~HITE BAOK~R~U"D PLEASE EXERCISE CAUTION ~ BLAOK LE~ER5 AROUND ANTENNAE DO NOT 8TAN~' IN FRONT OF ANTENNA8 811 CONCRETE SLAB DETAIL Ilxl~ SCALE: 3/4" = 24xD& SCALE: I I/2" = r-¢" SIGN DETAIL tlxlq SCALE. I I/2" -- i'-¢" 24x3& SCALE: 3" = I'-¢" SAFETY NOTICE SIGN Ilxlq SCALE. 3" I'-¢" 24x~& SCALE; ~" = PROPOSED METRO PCS bPS UNIT MOUNTED ON CABLE BRIDGE (TYPICAL OF 2) (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-5) I EQUIPHENT CABINET LEGEND PROPOSED LTE CABINET H 3'-0" X P 2'-II ID/lb" X N S'-II PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CADINE~ H 2'-II 8/8" X P ~'-I I~/1~" X H 8'-~ 11/I8" (~ PROPOSED BATTERY CABINET PROPOSED PC. CO/BELL FLOOD LIGHT MODEL ~5818-5 (OR~ H 2'-4 ~1/1~' X D 2'-4 ~/4" X H ?-q ~/16" CABLE APPROVED EQUAL) ~ITN ONLY (I) LIGHT FIXTURE. SECOND % .~ BRIDGE ASSEMBLY OR LIGHT IIOUSING ON FIXTURE MUST BE PLUGGED. FIXTURE TO~(,~ PR,O, POSED,BATTE,RY CABINET IlAvE PARSIIIELD GLARE VISOR INSTALLED OVER TIlE APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDE PAR LAMP. LAMP HOLDER UJITN SHIELD 5HALL BE SUPPORT POST8 @ 8'-0" ON POSITIONED IN A DOIUNtlJARD DIRECTION IN A MANNER CENTER MAXIMUM THAT UJOULD CONSTITUTE A FULL CUT-OFF LUMINAIRE (NO MoRE THAN ?% O~ THE LUMEN OUTPUT 15 AT ANGLE8 BETUEEN 5¢ * 8~ BEL0tU TIlE LOUJEST LIGHT-EMITTING PART OF TIlE LUMINAIRE). COAXIAL CABLES , ROUTED, ALONG CABLE ~i,!i:.x'.' PROPOSED METRO PCS PTC CABINET ON UNISTRUT FRAME BRIDGE GRATINe ON MOUNTED TO GALVANIZED POST HITH LleHT ABOVE TRAPEZE HANGERS .~ -~ ,, PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET5 PROPOSED JO'-O"+/- HleH LANDSCAPINe ~ ' ''/' (I LTE, I EQUIPMENT D I/2 ¢ 5C?,ED,,ULE 40 5CREENIN~ ~ ~!~}!_~,,. =.-<~/ . ON STEEL POST, AT 8-O x%-~; MAXIMUM ON CENTER ~----2L%b[~_~T_l[ EXISTING SOIL 1'-4" PlA, CONCRETE POOTING, USE 8"xS"xY2" BASE PLATE HITH DIA. ANCHOR5 POE MOUNTING TO 5LAB PROPOSED 6" THICK LAYER D/4" DIA. CRUSHED STONE BASE CABLE BRIDGE DETAIL Ilxl-/ SCALE: I/4" I'-®" 24x36 SCALE: V2" = I'-®" SET OF (~) 5TAKD5 GUY HIRES BETHEEN I/2 AND 2/S HAY UP TREE. 4" HIGH MULCH MOUND TO FORM SAUCER AROUND TREE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP I/S OF ROOT BALL. NEH PLANT GRADE PILL. -- SCARIFY 4" BELOH ROOT BALL RECOHPACTED. 5TAKE5 TO EXTEND 18" BELOH TREE PIT IN UNDISTURBED GROUND. PROPOSED STEEL BEAM PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB (SEE DETAILI/Z-5) TREE PLANTING DETAIL Ilxl~ SCALE: N.T.S, 24xD& SCALE, N.T S. TYPICAL EQUIPMENT ELEVATION Ilxl-/ SCALE, I/4" I'-¢" 24xD& SCALE: I/2" 1'-¢" TOP OF CONCRETE '=AD 0'-4" AGL(MAX.) ~P-,ADE DESIGNu _G_GROUP z A R C---~-I~ ~-~--~--~-~ ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZ LET, 73N2EZJsE. 6R2S 1RoY 07730 F: 232.847.4335 ~LANNING BOARD : SOUTHOLD LouMog~no, AIA AKCHIT~CT NJ - ~ AI 13345 . NY-~ 028992-1 Robert W. Toms STRUCTURAl_ ENGINEER NJ - ~ GE 36209 NY - # 075384 Z~Oq/02/lO RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS z~OS/Ib/lO ISSUE~P AS PRILIhdlNAP. Y'S F~EVISION REV DATE DESCRIPTION CLIENT: m troPCS CLIENT PROJECT NYqDI5 dl~10~ F~OUT~ 2~ F::'F::~..,d:)NI~.., N"Y" I I~ TOI, NN OF 50UTHOL]:::) PRAk~IN~ TITLE, Ny ¥5 5 O5 2_5 OF <58 APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION .,4 $CALE: NTB $C, ALE: NTB ~®. ~®. TITLE CONTROLLED INS*ECTIONS: T-I TITLE SHEET ®N-I ®ENERAL NOTE5 A-[ SITE PLAN A-2 EQUIPMENT PLAN ELEVATION THESE DOCUMENT5 ARE IN COMPLIANCE ~ ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE LtJITH THE FOLLOLUING CODES 5TANDARD$, LATEST EDITION5 AS APPLICABLE: 2¢¢3 iNTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 20~3 INTERNATIONAL ENEI~Y CONDERYATiON CODE A-4 ANTENNA PLAN ~ CABLE ROUTIN~ DETAILS UTILI"F'Y FRAME ELEVATIONS ,$ ®PS MOUNTIN® ~ETAIL A-5 FOUNDATION DETAILS ,$ EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS A-~ FENCE ~ ®ATE DETAILS A-'7 ANTENNA b'1OUNT ¢ CABLE LADDER DETAIL5 E~-J ~QUI~M~NT SP~OIFIOATIONS ES-2 PTO CABINET DETAIL ~F-I ~F INFORMATION E-I E~ECT~IOAL NOTES ~ INFORMATION E-2 ELEOT~IOAL PLAN E-4 ~OUN~[N¢ PETAIL¢ 2¢¢)5 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BdlLDING CODE 2~¢~ INTERNATIONAL FiRE CODE 2OO5 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GA$ CODE 2r¢~ INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 2¢¢~ INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE 2®®~ iNTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE 2¢¢¢~ INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE -TiA-222-F $TANDARD$ "$TRUCTLIRAL $TANDARD$ FOR STEEL ANTENNA TOUJER5 AND $LIPPORTINQ $TRL~CTURES" BASIC UiND SPEED OF 8B MILE$/I.qOLIR5 (5~ MILE5/HOUR, IN CONJUNCTION UITN ~.]5 INCHES OF RADIAL ICE). I~EFOt~E TOLl CALL TOLL FREE [N ',ITC/L[ TNP. EE I~:)Ir~KING DAY5 BEFORE YOL~ DIS MINIMUM S RF EN®INEER CONSTRUCTION DATE ~ATE LEGAL E)ESO -.IPTION: BLOCK, LOT, 14.00[ PP-.,O.JEOT INFO MATION: SITE $TF~-UOTURE HEICHT, LATITUDE: 4181~ MAIN PECONIC, NY IDI.~'+/- ASL N 41 ° 25' SD" DATUM : ~ -'~2° 2D' DO" [NAD 8D ~P. OUND EL'=VATION, ---*/- AMSL (NAME;' 88) ANTENNA (~AD CENTER), ' .9'+ qO-o . ALPHA $ECTOR: 80" BETA SECTOP-: 180' PP-..O JEC, T I P~.OPERT¥ OP4NE'IR: PECONIO POLICE E;EPART"4ENT .41815 h4AIN ROA~ F~OPE~,T'¢ 6ONTACT: TOP4N OF: SOUTHOLD 5BOq5 ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD, NM I I~q'l UTILIT'f CONTACT: LIPA ~ VERIZON APPL I CANT:: RF EN®INEE:R: CONSTRUCT I ON i'dANA®ER: B BK'"'LINE DRIVE HA!.NTHORNE, NY 105B"~ETAIq ST/J' PUBSdANT OF THr APPROVED AS NOTE FARID ARDAKANI NOTIFY BUILDING FRANK. INSPECTIONS: 1. FOUNDATION - TWO F i F,~,OR P. QUJ~ED CONCRETE DOU® HALL (51~) ~ R~)~'~R'~ING, PLUMBING, STRAPPING, ELECTRICAL & 3 INSULATION 4 FINAL - CONSTRUCTION & ELECTE MUST BE COMPLETE FOR C.O ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REOUIREMENTS OF THE C YORK STATE DESIGN° GROUP z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O, BOX 3 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4334 LouMo~lino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ-~AI13345 NY-~ 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTUILkL ENGINEER NJ-¢GE36209 NY-~ 075384 CT - ¢ 22375 PA- ¢ 061412 SEAL metroPCS, New York, L.L.C. SITE I NFO~,f'dATI ON F~OONIO, N~ I I~r~ TOYNN OF: $Ol. JTHOLZ} DESI®N T'YF~E: 6OLOOATION SHEET TITLE ~ I 05/Ob/O~ F~EV. OCCUP,~y I. ALL CONSTRUCTION, LABOR AND MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WiTH ALL LOCAL AND STATE BUILDINO CODES, OP. DINANGES AND AGCOt~.DANCE /qITH NfANUFAGTURER'S INSTR. UCTIONS. ALL ~U~FAOE~ OONTA~INATION SHALL ~ ~E~OVE~ ~lO~ TO PAINTIN~ TO THE ~UL~S AN~ ~E~ULATIONS OF ALL A~ENOIES HAVIN~ JU~IS~IOTION. THE NE~ SU~FAO~S. ALL ~ALVANIZE~ SURFACES $HALL HAVE ONE GOAT OF ~E~ABON~ BON~IN~ A~NT, ~HIL~ STILL APPL~ ONE GOAT OF $H~IN ~ILLIA~$ FLAT LATEX PAINT, LET ~ THEN A SEOON~ OOAT OF FLAT LATEX PAINT. 2. THE ~ONT~AOTO~ ~U~T VISIT THE BITE AN~ BE ~EBPON~IBLE FO~ VE~IF~IN~ ALL ~I~ENBIONB AN~ OON~ITIONB. AN~ 21. MATERIAL5 AN~ OONDITION5 NOT PAB~IOATE~ CORRECTLY, PAMASED OR NON-CONFOR~IN~ 5HALL DE REPO~TE~ TO 4. THE OONT~AOTO~ SHALL PROVIDE ALL ITEMS OF LABOR AND MATERIALS, ~HETHE~ O~ NOT BPEOIFIOALLY IN~ICATE~, IF OONSTRUCTION MANAGER, A/E AND O~NER P~IO~ TO ANY OO~REGTIVE AOTION. ALL ACTION5 RE~UI~E6 APPROVAL F~ON THE ~E~UI~E~ TO O0~PLETE THE INSTALLATION. O~NZ~. ~ZLET, NEWJERSEY 0~30 5. THE GONT~AOTO~ 5HALL DE ~PON~IDL~ FO~ ADEQUATE D~ACIN~ AN~ P~OTEGTIN~ OF ALL AO~K DU~IN¢ CONSTRUCTION 22. GONT~ACTO~ NUST INSTALL ~F NA~NINO ~ION5 AT ALL ENT~ POINT5 TO Z~UIPNENT A~EAS. THESE ARE TO INOLU~E, BUT TO AVOID DAmAgE, COLLAPSE, DISTORTION, NISALIONHENT, VOI~INO ROOFIN~ OUA~ANTEE5 AN~ NA~ANTIES, ETC. P~OTECTION NOT LI~ITE~ TO, INTE~IO~ PAGE5 OF ~OOF AOOESS BOOED / HATCHES. AND EXTERIOR FAONS AT OONPOUN~ AGOES5 ~ATE5 TEE: 73 2.8 8 8.6 21 0 ~E~TO~E~ TO O0~PLETE ~ATE~ TI~HTNE55 ~ITH THE APP~OVEP ~ATE~IAL AN~ A5 PRE-APP~OVE¢ ~M THE O~NE~ I~ FOUNDATION5 8. ALL NATE~IAL5 5HALL BE IN$TALLE~ A5 PE~ THE NANUFAOTURER5 SPECIFICATIONS. I. 50IL HAS AN A55UHE~ BEARINO OAPAGIT% OF 2,500 POUNd5 PE~ 5~UARE FOOT. ESTI~ATE~ DOTTO~ OF FOOTINO [GU Mog o, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ~CHZTECT STRUCTU~ ENGINEER ELEVATION5 A~E $HO~N ON FOUNDATION PLAN. THESE ELEVATION5 SHALL DE ADJUSTEP TO THE ACTUAL LEVEL5 OF NJ- ¢AI 13345 NJ- ¢ GE 36209 7. Do NOT BOALE D~A~IN~S. APP~OVE~ DEA~INO STRATA FOUN~ UPON EXOAVATION. ANY UNUSUAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE A~CHITEGT/EN~INEE~. ~- ¢ 028992-1 ~' ¢ 075384 CT - ¢ 22375 THESE PLANS. ALL ~0~ PE~FO~ME~ 5HALL BE ~ONE IN A 000~ ~ORKNANBHIP MANNE~ TO THE 5ATISFAOTION OF THE O~NE~. 2. NO BACK FILLIN~ OF FOUNDATION ~ALL6 SHALL BE ~ONE UNTIL SLAB ON ~OUN~ IS IN PLAOB AND CONCRETE HA5 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TA~E ALL PREOAUTIONA~Y EFFORT5 TO PROTEOT THE NE~ E~UIP~ENT ~U~IN~ THIS INSTALLATION AN~ BET. APPLIOATION BUOH ~. BOTTOM OF FOOTINGS ~HALL BE A ~INI~U~ O~ 4'-0" BELO~ FINISHZ~ ~A~E FO~ F~OBT P~OTEOTION. NO -THE TENANT'S E~EBB TO AN~ FRO~ THE BUILDIN~ AN~/O~ THE BITE. FOOTIN~5 SHALL BE PLAOE~ ON F~OZEN ¢~OUN~ O~ ~ATE~. ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BE P~OTECTE~ F~OM P~OBT, AB -THE BUILDIN~'B FI~E SAFETY OR SHALL NOT O~EATE AN% FIRE HAZARDS. -THE STrUCTUrAL INTE~IT~ AND SAFETY OP THE BUILDINg. A -THE~E 5HALL NOT BE ANY O~EATION OF NOIBE OUT5I~E THE NO~AL HOUr50~ 1 A~ TO 6 P~, UNLE5B OTHERWISE A~REE~ 4. ~AXI~U~ SLOPE BETWEEN BOTTOH OF A~JA~ENT FOOTINGS 5HALL BE ONE (I) MERTIOAL TO (2) HORIZONTAL. ALL UPON ~ITH THE O~NE~. FOUNDATION ~ALL5 5HALL BE ADEQUATELY B~A~ED TO ~ITHBTAN~ BAO~ FILLINg, EARTH PRESSURE, AN~ A -THE BUIL~IN~'5 5E~URIT~ SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN 0~ TO PREVENT ANY UNAUTHORIZED PErSoNS F~O~ ENTE~IN~ THE CON5T~UOTION LOADS UNTI~ ALL E~UIP~ENT A~ IN5TALLED PE~ THE CONBTRUOTION D~A~IN~6. -THE BUILOIN~'S UTILITY'S (ELEOT~IGITY, OAS, NATE~ AN~ OTHE~ UTILITY'S) SHALL NOT BE INT/~UPTE~ OU~INO THIS APPLICATION g INSTALLATION. I. CONCRETE HAS BEEN OESI~NEP AN~ SHALL BE OONST~UGTE~ IN AOOO~OANCE NITH REQUI~ENENTS OF THE A~E~IOAN -ALL ~ABON~ PENETRATION5 SHALL BE ~ONE UBINO ~OTA~Y ACTION ONL~ (NO HA~NZ~INO ACTION). OONO~TE INSTITUTE (AOl) BUIL~IN¢ CODE FO~ ~EINFO~OE~ CONCRETE, LATEST -ALL PENETRATION5 5HALL BE FI~E-BTOPPEP NITH 3N F5 I~D N~AP STRIP FIRE-DTOP AN~ OP25 NoN-SHrINK PUT~ FI~E BAR~IE~ SEALANT NAINTAIN THE FI~E RATINO OF ALL PENETrATeD SURFACES. 2. THE MATERIAL SHALL OONFO~ TO THE FOLLO~INO 5TANDA~D~ AND ~E~UI~EMENT5 (LATEST PO~TLAN~ CEMENT ABTN 0150 5gAL ~. THE OONT~AOTO~ 5HALL, AT ALL TI~ES, KEEP THE P~E~IDE5 F~EE F~ON AOCUNULATION OF ~ASTE, CONSTRUCTION ~ATE~IAL REA~% ~lX CONCRETE ASTN 0~4 ~ AGI-301 AND ~UBBISH UPON COMPLETION, ALL ~EBRIS SHALL BE ~ENOMED AN~ THE PRE~ISES LEFT IN A "~00~ CLEAN" CONOlTION. GONO~ETE A55~ESATE AST~ ODD ALL ~UBBI~H SHALL BE ~ISPO$~ OF IN A LEOAL ~ANNE~. DE~O~NE~ BILLET BTEBL BA~ ABT~ A&ID , /,... ~ELPED ~I~E FABRIC AST~ AI55 I0. THE OONT~AOTO~ SHALL ~OORDINATE ALL SPECIAL OONSIDERATION5 OF THE OONBT~UOTION (EX. NOIB~ OPERATIONS, INTErrUPTIONS OF ANY ~EGHANIOAL ANP/O~ ELECTRICAL SE~MIOES, HATE~IAL DZL[WE~IE5 AN~/O~ STO~A~E) ~ITH THE D. PO~TLAN~ CEMENT SHALL BE TYPE IA. DUIL~INO ~ANA~E~ENT TO $TA~T TH~ ~o~. 4. OE~ENT SHALL ~MELO~ A OO~E$SIW~ $T~EN~TH (F'O) OF BO00 ~$l AFTE~ 28 ~AY$ AN~ HAVE A ~INI~UM $LU~ .(~b~ INOHES, AN~ A ~AXI~U~ OF INOHES. PLANS. ALL EXJSTIN¢ AREA5 OF THE BUILD]NC PANASED ~Y THE GONTRACTO~ SHALL BE ~ESTO~EP TO O~I~INAL ~ON~ITION AT NO A~IT~ONAL O05T TO THE O~NER. 5. P~OPO~TIONiN~ OP THE OONO~ETE ~rx 5HALL ~E ~% THE ~P~OI~IO ~AVJT~ ~ETHO~. THI~ PO¢UH~NT I~ THE ~ESICN, P OOPYRI~HT OF "THE MTM ~B¢I~N ~RODP, INO." AND 12. ALL EL~OTRIOAL ~0~ SHALL ~E PErFOrmED ~ A LIOENSED ELEOT~IOIAN AN~ OONFO~H TO ALL ~U/L~LN~ 00~ AN~ 8. VI~ATO~S 9HALL HAVE A ~INI~U~ F~EQUENOM OF qO00 ~P~. PO~PUPLiOATioNTHE eXOLUSlVEo~ u$EUSEAITHOUTB~ THBBxpRE$$TITLE OLI~NT~iTTENANM LOOAL UTILITY'5 ~E~UI~ENENTS. ~. MINI~U~ A~¢~EOATE 51ZE 5HALL DE 3/4" INCH. I~. THE OENE~AL NOTES GONTAINEP HEREIN ARE PA~T OF THE PLAN5 AND SPECIFICATIONS, AN~ A~ TO BE COHPLIED ~ITH IN ~. CONCRETE 5HALL BE STONE OONG~ETE HAVIN~ AN ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF D,O00 PS1 AT 25 DAY5 ~ITH A MINIMUN 5TAN~AR~5, LATEDT E~ITION5 A5 APPLIOADLE: -2¢03 [NTE~AT[QNAL DDILDIN5 CODE ~ OONO~ETE ~lX SHALL DE iN ACCO~PANGE AITH A.CJ. CODE. New L.L.C, -2¢¢3 INTERNATIONAL ENEMY CONSERVATION CODE I0. CONT~AGTO~ 5HALL OOOR~INATE ALL OF THE RE~UI~EHENT5 P~IO~ TO POU~fN~ OONCRETE TO - 2¢¢3 INTERNATIONAL EXISTIN~ DUlLDiN~ CODE ANY AN~ ALL PENeTrATION5 PO~ ARGHITEOTU~AL, STrUCTUrAL, ~EGHANIGAL ~ ELECTRICAL ~A~INO5. -2¢¢3 INTE~ATIONAL FI~E CODE 51TN - 2¢¢3 INTERNATIONAL PLD~D[N~ CODE - 2¢~3 INTERNATIONAL P~OPE~TY MAINTENANCE C~D~- O~ CONCRETE ~EINFORGE~ENT" (ADTN A52-~0), OR "SPEC FOR AEL~E~ STEEL NI~E FABRIC FO~ GONO~ETE SITE INFORNATION ~EINFO~GENENT, (ASTN A]~5-~O). ~EINFO~GINO 5HALL B~ SECURELY TIE~ TO PREVENT DISLOCATION AND PE~ THE AGI - 2¢¢3 INTERNATIONAL ~ES~D.E~AL CODE' ' - ' ~ ............... ' -TIA-2~'SY~GTU~AL ~~0~ STEEL ANTENNA TO~N~ 5UPPO~TIN~ 5T~UOTU~ES" HINI~U~ BASIC ~ETAiLIN~ ~ANUAL. .-- ~/~ ..... ~/ ......... ~% ~ 12. ALL BA~B NA~KE~ OONTINUOU5 (CONT.) 5HALL BE LAPPE~ 40 X DA~ DIA~ETE:~ AT 5PLIOZ$ AN~ OO~NE~5 i5, AL-~'~POSED': .xt"] ......... 5TRUOTU~AL STEEL SHALL BE FABRICATED AND E~EGTE~ IN AOOO~ANG~I=~I~OO~E AN~ ABT~ HOOKE~ AT NON-CONTINUOUS ENDS. LAP TOP BArB AT CENTE~ BETWEEN 5UPPO~T5 AND LAP CONTINUOUS BOTTO~ OONI N~ I I~ 5PEGIFIOATION5, LATEST E~ITION. DA~5 AT SUPPORTS. TONE QF 5OUTHO -~IDE PLANTE DEOTION5 5HALL OONFOR~ TO AST~ -~150. 5TEEL SHALL OONFO~ TO ABT~ ANT-DA ID. ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS 5HALL BE THO~OU~HLW GLEANED, AER~ED AND 5LUBHE~ ~ITH CEMENT O~OUT JUST -ALL STEEL PIPES 5HA~L OONFO~ TO TO ABTH ANT-501 O~ ANT-SD, O~A~E B. BEFO~E PLACIN¢ NEE CONCRETE. THE CONCRETE AN~ ~ABON~Y CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL (0~ OlVE OTHE~ DESION T~PE: -OONNEGTION5 SHALL MA~E USINO SPEGIFIE~ ~EL~S AND ~EL~INO. ELECT~O~ES E-qOXX O~ SP~OIFIED HIOH ST~ENOTH BOLTS T~A~ES AMPLE OPPO~TUNIT~ TO INSTALL) ALL ANOHO~ BOLTS, PLATES, SLOTS, CHASES, NAILERS, INSE~TS, SLEEVES, I~. -ALL 5HOP AN~ FIEL~ ~ELDIN~ 5HA~ ~E DONE ~ ~ELDE~5 QUALIFIE~ AC ~E~O~I~E~ IN THE "A~E~IOAN $O01ET~'$ 5TAN~A~ QUALIFIOATION PROOEPU~E" TO PERFORN THE P~OPOSE~ ~0~. 14. P~OVI~E ~INI~U~ OONO~ETE OOVE~ FO~ REINFO~OIN~ BA~5 A5 FOLLOW5: EXPOSEP TO ORAPE FOOTINg5 (3"), ~A~N BY: OHECKED ~T: BATE: -~E HOT ~IPPE~ ~ALVANIZE~ AFTE~ FA~IOATION (ONL% EXPOSE~ TO ~OISTURE APPLIOATJONS) PE~ AST~ A-12~. ALL INTE~IO~ FAOE5 OF ~ALL5 (1"), EXTE~IO~ FAOE50P ~ALL5 (I-I/2"), 5LA~ TOP AN~ BOTTO~ ~A~5 (3/4"), BEA~$ (I-I/2"), ~ANACE5 SURFACES, ~EL~EP A~EA5 AN~ AUTHORIZE~ NON-~ALVANIZE~ ~EHBE~50~ PART5 (NE~ O~ OLD) 5HALL DE PAINTE~ 5LAD ON OROUN~ BOTTON (3"), COLUMNS, AN~ PAP5 AN~ (2") TO VE~TIOAL BARS. ~ITH T~O (2) OOAT5 OF Z~O OOLD ~ALVANIZlN~ O0~POUN~ NANUFAOTU~E~ B~ A~O CHE~IOAL -ALL PIPE SIZE5 IN~IOATE~ HEREIN A~E NOMINAL DIA~ETE~ (INSIDE ~IA~ETER). FOR ~ASON~Y ANOHO~5 5PAOE~ AT 2'-0" O.G. ~AXI~U~. I~. ALL NE~ ANTENNA APPLIOATION5 ~OUNTE~ TO EXTE~IO~ ~ALL5 CHALL BE 5EALEP AT THE TOP AN~ 51~E5 ~ITH ~0~ ~~AI OORNIN~ 5LEAR 51LIOONE SEALANT O~ APP~OME~ E~UAL. THE ¢ILIGONE APPLIOATION¢ SHALL BE TOOLE~ TO NAINTAIN A I¢. THE OONTRAOTO~ 5HALL APPLY A NON-SLIP B~OON FINISH INHE~IATEL~ AFTER THE T~O~EL FINISHIN~ PHASE. FINICHED APPEA~ANOE. Iq. THE CONT~ACTO~ SHALL TA~E ALL NEOE55A~ P~EOAUTION5 IN O~E~ TO P~OTEGT THE OONORETE I& ~HE~E IN~IOATEP ON THE PLAN5 THE OONT~AOTOR 5HALL PAINT ALL NE~ ANTENNAS, SHROUD AN~ ~ELATED MOUNTIN~ P~EMATURE OU~IN~ A5 500N AC THE FO~M5 A~E ~EMOMED, ECPEOIALL% DU~IN~ THE FIRST 24 HOURS. ~H~T NU~ ~V. HA~ARE TO MATOH THE EXISTIN~ ADJAOENT 5U~AOES. ALL PAINT CHALL BE CHER~IN ~ILLIAM~ O~ APPROVED E~UAL. THE FILL OONTRAOTO~ 5HALL NOT USE A METAL BASED PAINT ON THE ANTENNAS. ANTENNA5 5HALL HAVE ONE P~IME~ OOAT OP POLANE I. ALL FILL UN~ER OONO~ETE 5LAB5 TO BE q5% COMPAOTE~ EARTH, AELL TAMPE~ AN~ 4" OOMPAOTE~ 2.g PLU~ FIL ~IH~5 P~I~ IN ACOOR~ANO~ ~ITH ~ANUFAOTU~E~'~ IN~T~UOTION~ AN~ THEN APPLM ON~ TOP OOAT IN ~AVEL. ALL ~AO~ FILL ~ATE~IAL ~HALL BE F~EE OF AN~ O~ANIO ~ATTE~. PP,.OPOSED ELECTRIC ROUTED OVERHEAD FROM - BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE / ; ~ ~'""/' / I~ = EXISTIN¢ UTILITY POLE :1*25~ TO NEPt METRO PCS AND TAKEN FROX THE FOLLO~N~ / ~ ~ n ~ / / <~ ~:;_ ~ -- D E S I GN - A DRAXlN~ TITLED ~ITE ~'LAN, PREPARED ~Y / ? 2 ~ ~ ~ - /~OU~ X ~= EXlSTINSTELCOFROMEXIDTIN¢ A R C H I T E C T U E E NEXTEL COMMUNIOAT]ON5 BY ~ILLIAM F. / % ~ ~ ~ / E N G I N E E R [ N COLLINS A I.A. A~CHITECT~, 1212 ~OHNOLO~ / ~ ~ ~ / CSt CABINET DRIP, 5ETAUKET, NY 11~33 DASD [0/0¢/~5. / ~ < < o / P.O. BOX 3 / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~LET, NEW JERSEY 0~30 - 51TE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN D~ THE M~ / ~ ~ ~ = ~ ' / gESlSN eROUP lNG. AT SITE VISIT ON 4.14.Oq / ~ 2 ~ ~ / TEL: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 2 1 0 ~ ~ LOT: J Lou Mog]ino, A~i Robot W. Toms, P.E. ( ~"~~ ....... ~Sr ~0'r E / / /f NJ - ¢ ~ 13345 ~- ~ GE 36209 - ~- ~ 028992-1 ~' ¢ 075384 /~~~, ~ll~e;;~~ ;;%%~;~¢ / / / CT - ¢ 22375 / ANTENNAS (~P. OF 2 PER / SECTOR, ¢ TOTAL) ON / MO~NTEP TO EXISTIN5 / ~XISTIN~ t~l-~ HIgH SELF / 5UPPORTIN~ LATTIOE /~ 05/Bi/O~155~E~ FOR 6ONS~OTION L / TO~ER ~ 5HEL~R (BY OTHERS) ~ / , , ? . / ~ / ~~~,~,,~ / ~ / ~ / ~ I ~, -~%y~(_ / ~ / ~ 5~ uo~¢, N~7~15 j / ~IT~ INFOrmATION J ~ ~ ~ONI~ N~ I1~ / ¢ / ~ .......... ¢_~.¢4'... ~ , ~ ~ ~ / / / ~x CT~X¢ ~U~PX~T ' .... - COLOCAT[ON N II I0' 00"E '1~.00' '-- ~ 2 L. ¢~e' ~ / ~ PROPOSED XET~O PCS E~UIPHEXT SH~T TITLE CABINETS (~P. OF 2) MOUNTEO ON 5 4b~ ~q' ~" ~ J ~ NE~STEEL~AILSANCHO~DTO ~1 ~ ~ MAIN ROAD ~,o.os~o IO'x14' GONG*ETE SLAB SECTION: O~S ~ SHEET NUMDE~ LOT. 4.2q LOT: LOT: 8.2 7 LOT: 8 ~LO~K: I j LOT: E LOT: IO.~ Ilxlq SOALE:I"=ISO'-O"II 24xD& 5OALE: 1"=75'-o" Ix[% 5OALE:I"=~O'-O' I 24x~¢ SCALE: I"=1~'-O" I ~, · _TOP OF EXISTIN5 HHIP ANTEN_NAS (BY OTHERS~ ),~ ~' " E×ISTINS 145'-0" + ~,BOYE ~,ADE ~tHIP ~ ~ ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING OTHERS LATTIGESELFEXISTINOsuPPORTINOTONE,B1-0 HIOH X X~ ~ X XX X : ANTENNA5 DY OTHE,5 ~ ] P.O. BOX3 TOP OF EXISTINO TONER ~ CENTER OF ~ : ; % EXISTINO PANEL ANTENNA5 (AT, T) _ = ~ = ~ = ~E: 732.888.6210 ~ I~O~BO~DE ....... F~: 732.847.4334 Lou MoElino, AN ~ Rob~ W. Toms, P.E. EXlSTIN~ POLIO~ ANTENNA5 ~ NJ - ~ ~ 13345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 ~- ¢ 028992-1 ~- ¢ 075384 - xx ~, :: CT - ~ 22375 METRO PANEL ANTENNAS (~P. OF 2 PER , ~ // ~ ~% ~O~NTED TO EXISTIN¢ TO~ER ~ // ~~ ~ N :: ~ ~q2'-~"~ ABO~ 6RAOE -- ]SLO'' CHAIN LINK FENCE ~ETRO COAXIAL CABLES ROU~ UP TO~ER ON 8" 14'-0" CONORETE SLAB 8" PER SECTOR, O TOTAL) ON NEH ANTENNA SUPPORT EXISTINO AGOESS ~ATE F ~ xx EXISTINO 131-O' H~H SELF~ J¢¢/ N I~ CABLE5 ~OUTEO ALONO NEH CABLE I , i~ ~ CABLES ¢OUTEO UP TOHE~ ON i~¢ X / (SEE OETAIL 2/A-~) ~OUNTED TO CABLE BRID~E B~IDCE (SEE DETAIL 2/A- ,. -~ ~- - . ' - ~ MOUNTED TO CABLE B~IO~E ~ ~11 N / ~XISTINe ¢' HISH OHAIN LINK . ~ , ,- .7~_ ~m_ - = r > ~ PROPOSED TELGO ROUTED UNDERkx - ~ ..... ~E:= ,~ . -~=-~z =', . =~ o~ %z COMPOUND ~ITH PROPOSED ME~O POS 6'-0' ~ ~ I~J~ %1~ NOTE. EXISTINO SURFACE FROM EXISTINO % , ,,_*,, _ .... j -~k/(~ ~ ,,_~,, ~ 0 ~ HleH CMA N LINK FENCE ~ TH ~ED ~I~E AT ~ ~ lin Ar , ' ..... New Yo~ L.L.C. COMPOUN~ (VERIFY ~[TH TOHN ~ / ~ ~ 0 NOT SHO~N FOR CLAR[~ - UTILT~ COMPANY ~TM dO~¢, O~MPSTSO08 HE~O PCS POLE IN COMPOUND - > ~ < 5]TE INFORMATION INSTALLEO IN NE~ COHPOUNO, ~ .... < ~ ' ~EXISTIN¢ EQUIPHENT , i SHELTER (BY OTHERS) TO DE COORDINATED HITH EXISTIN~ 0 HIOH CHAIN L NK , ~ ~ ~ ~11 ~/ ~ / UTILI~ CONPANT ~: xx > TO~N OF 5QUTHQL~ PROPOSE~ ~ETRO PCS 6'-0" BARBEO ~IRE AT TOP (~E xxx ~SION TYPE: ~1~ A-~ ~O~ DETAILS) / ~E~OABI~ET55TEEL(~P~AiLsOFANOHORED2) HOUNTEPToON ~ %~ EXISTIN¢ ~ ~/// A5 PER A STRUCTURAL A~A~SJ5 REPORT P~EPARE~ TQUIPMENT- / CONSULTiN~ ENgiNEErS, ]NO. ~2 ~EST UPPE~ FE~Y ~OA~, ~AHN ~T: ~HECK~ BY, PATE, PROPOSED OONO~TE SLAB (1¢0 SHELTER (BY OTHERS) ~ EHIN~, NJ 08828,(WIOHAEL L. BOHLINCER, PE NY TELCO ROUTED UNDER EXISTIN6 / EXISTIN~ 130-0 HIOH LATIOE LOCA~D IN PECONIC (TONN OF SHEET TITLE PROPOSED 4-0 AIDE ACOESS 6ATE SU~FAOE TO PROPOSED CONFOUND / SOUTHHOLD), MEN YORK, SUFFOLK COUNTY MEETS THE ~QUI~EMENT5 OF TIA/EIA-222-F FOR AN 80 MPH FASTEST-MILE NJTH BARBED ~IRE AT TOP (TYP. OF PROPOSED METRO PCS EQUIPHENT CABINETS MIND SPEEO NITH I/2" OF RADIAL ICE NITH 25~ MIND LOAO 2)(SEE O~NIN6 A-6 FOR DETAILS)~¢ (~P. OF 2) MOUNTED ON STEEL RAILS REDUCTION FOR THE PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION. THE PROPOSED HETRO PCS FTC ~ ANCHORED TO OONCRE~ 5LA~ (1~0 SQ. FT FOUNDATION REACTIONS, HITH THE PROPOSED LOAOlNO CABINET ~ITH LIOHT ON~ LEASE AREA)(SEE ORANIN~S A-5 ~ NS-E) CONPI¢U~TiON, MERE FOUND TO BE LESS THAN THE CAPAOITY 5H~T NU~ ~. POST (SEE DETAIL I/A-4) OF THE EXISTIN¢ FOUNDATION OESi~N. THEREFORE NO NODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED. I[xIW SOALE:B/IO :l-0 24xBO 55ALE: I/2"=1'-0" Ilxlq SGALE:I"=40'-O" 24x56 SCA/ : I":10'-0" / MOUNTED TO GABLE [- I SUPPORT POST (SEE DETAIL D/A-4) , ~ P~OPOS~ VALMONT CA~LE =, I I D20' I ~ ~ ~6OAXIAL CABLE5 ROUTED ALONG GABLE ~ ~T, ~WJERSEY 0~30 / / /~ / /' ~AHHA I ~ ~ ~ I D~IPeE 5RATIN5 ON TRAPEZE HANSER5~ TEL: 7 3 2.8 8 8 6 2 1 0 , ,, ~ ~ ~/ ~ / / SECTOR I q~ I (SEE DETAIL 2/A-~) EXlSTIN5 I~1-~ H[eH 5ELF % ~~ / t J F~: 7 B 2.8 4 7.4 ~ B 4 SUPPORTING LATTICE TO~E~ ~-- ~ 3 ~ ~ D I/2" NOHINAL ~IAHETE~ 5OHEDdLE 40-~ Lou ~ POST, AT 5'-O" HAXINDN ON CEN~ ~C~CT < NJ - ¢ ~ 13345 ~ - ~ GE 36209 % ~ ~ ¢ 075384 ~ v~oPosev VAL~O~T CABLe ~ ~ ~ - ¢ 0289924 CT ¢ ~ 22375 , ~IVSE ASSEMBLY O~ PA ~ ~ 061412 ~ -~ E ~ GOAXIAL GABLZ~ ~OUTEV UV OA~LZ APP~OVEV e~DAL ~EE ~ BRIVCE PO3T ON VALHONT DOUBLE HANUFAOTD~E~ ~ z ~ ~ E~UAL (~EE ~ETAIL5 8~/A-3) INSTALLATION APP~OVE~ E~UAL ¢ B'-O" ON 6EN~ 05/~1/0~ 155~EP 60NS~UOTt0~ ' -'-.' '~ DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PiPE ~ ,.'Y:... ~' ,'/,.. 1'-4" CONCRETE FOOT[NO (SEE DETAIL5 PROPOSED COAXIAL CABLE5 / ~ (~P[CAL) x>, ' 4~5/A-~ FOR HO~NTIN5 TO 5LAD) (~PICAL) 5ECU~D TO . .N -.- . . . P~OPOSED &" THiGK LAYE~ 3/4" DIA. SNAP-IN CLIP5 TOTAL) ON ANTENNA SUPPORT F~AME5 ~OUNTED TO EXISTIN¢ TOAE~ LEG (SEE 80' ' [ANTENNA MOUNTIN PLAN 2 I GABLE ELEVATION D, ~OUNT ETAIL GABLE Ne~ ~ gCC. ~ ~/2"* ANOHO* 5ET 4 I/4" INTO HILTI- 5UPPO*T PO$T (SEE DETAIL I/A-D) D~OKET ~OOEL 5021~ ~ /HY-I50 SYSTEH (DEE HANUFAC~RE~ PROPOSED VAL~ONT T-LINE /SPECIFICATIONS FO~ INSTALLATION APPROVED E~UAL SPACED ~ ~ P~OGEDURE) (T~PICAL OF 4 PEA PLATE) ~'-O" ON CEN~ (AS ~ ~ ~1/2"¢ ~EP HOLE X % 8 xe xl/2 BASE PLA~ PROPOSED CONC~TE 5LAS 3 ~ TO~N OF 3OUTHOLD ' ~ ' G[ ~ II g"xb"xl/2" BASE PLATE ~ ~ g h ~ D~AGKET PLAN DESION TYPE: ~ II ~ I ~- P~oPosE~ OONOKETE 5LAB PKOPOSEP ~ I/2" NOHINAL DIAMETER ~__~_ ~ PKOVI~E NON-SHrINK OROUT ¢ POST ~ELDED ONTO ~"xW'xl/2" BASE PLATE -'~'2,~ ~¢ ~ ~ % AND ~ASE PLA~ I/2"¢ ANCHO~ 5ET 4 I/4" INTO HILTI-HIT H%-iSO -/ PROPOSED ~OAXIAL ~ABLE5 ~ ~ 5YSTE~ (SEE HANUPA~TU~R5 5PEOIPI~ATION5 !. ~ 5" ~ !,, "]~ ~q ~ ~O~~ ~ ~ ' FOR INSTALLATION PROOEDU~E) (~P]CAL OF 4 2 ~ '. L % =~ DOUBLE T-LINE { ( ' 2 CABLE .; '- " /-' ' 'L '. PE~ PLATE) 6" 8" SUPPORT POST ~ITH STANDARD SNAP-IN SHEET TITLE *;q .' ;~/'. :.-"~ ~ EXISTIN~ SOIL .' .' ~' (SEE DETAIL I/A-D) GL]PS GABLE OUTiN ETAILS ~ ~ -- -o Gl °l: ~ PROPOSED VAL~ONT DOUBLE ~ T-LINE B~O~ET APPROVED : 6ENTE~ (AD ~EQUI~D) NOTES= I. ALL MATERIAL TO BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED 2. SECURE EQUIPMENT TO UNISTRUT BRACKETS UTILIZING UNIBTRUT CHANNEL NUTS 3. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MOUNTED TO UNISTRUT FRAME AS PER GOVERNIN~ OODE REQUIREMENTS (HELD ALL AROUND) (TYPICAL OF 2) IIlxl-/ SCALE:I/2": I '-0" NOTES: --PROPOSED LITHONIA 5¢¢.U LAMP MODEL 5¢®-12¢-LPI (TO ~SE OPERATED ON A 6~ M[NtJTE TIMER) PLO00 (TYPICAL) QUANTITY AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED TO MOUNT EQUIPMENT /2"¢ U-BOLT (TYPICAL OF 2 PER UNISTRUT) --PROPOSED PTC CABINET ON SUPPORT POSTS PROPOSED TIMER SHITCH PROPOSED 2 [/2" NOMINAL DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PIPE AITH CAP ('TYPICAL OF 2) 8"xS"xl/2" BASE PLATE H/(4) ]/2"¢ HILT] HIT HY-150 H/2 I/8"EMBEDMENT INTO CONORETE SLAB (SEE DETAIL 2/A-4) 11 FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB 8"xS"xl/2" BASE PLATE PROPOSED 2 I/2"¢ SCHEDULE 40 CABLL BRIDGE SUPPORT POST AELDED ONTO 8"xS"xl/2" ~,ASE PLATE (TYPICAL OF 2) I/2"¢ ANCHOR SET 2 I/8" INTO HILTI-HiT HY-150 SYSTEM (SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPE¢IF]CATIONS '=OR INSTALLATION PROCEDURE) (TYPICAL OF 4 PER PLATE) I UTILITY M'OUNT ~ETAIL .2 I POST BASE PLAN 24xs6 SCALE: S/,4-'=I'-O" Ilxlq SOALE:S/4"=I'-O" 124xS SCALE: I I/2"=1'-o" I~" 8" MIN, I. THE ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF THE CPS ANTENNA SHALL DE ]N ACCORDANCE HITH THE FINAL RF REPORT 2, THE CPS ANTENNA MOUNT IS DESIGNED TO FASTEN TO A STANDAPJ2 H/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER, SCHEDULE 40, GALVANIZED STEEL OR STAINLESS STEEL PIPE. THE PIPE MUST NOT BE THREADED AT THE ANTENNA MOUNT END. THE PiPE SHALL BE CUT TO THE REQUIRED LENGTH (MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES) USING A HAND O~ ROTARY PIPE CUTTE~ TO ASSURE A SMOOTH AND PERPENDICULAR GUT. A HACK 5A~ SHALL NOT USED. THE OUT PIPE END SHALL BE DEBUR~D AND SHOOTH IN ORDER TO SEAL ACAINST THE NEOPRENE ~AS~ET ATTAOHED TO THE AN~NNA HOUNT. ~. THE MOUNTIN5 PLATE SHALL DE FAD~ICATEO A5 SHOAN AND ATTACHEO TO THE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT STRUO~RE USIN~ U-BOLTS. THE SUPPORT PIPE SHALL THEN DE ATTACHED TO THE HOUNTIN¢ PLATE USIN~ THE OVE~51ZE U-BOLTS PROVIDE~ TO ALLO~ ADJUSTMENT. IT ]5 CAITICAL THAT THE 5PS ANTENNA IS MOUNTED SUCH THAT ~T IS HITHIN 2 DE~EE5 OF VERTICAL AND THE BASE OF THE ANTENNA IS AITHIN DESREE5 OF LEVEL. I/4" THICK PLATE 3" S" 2" I" I I I MOUNTIN~ B~A~KET PLATE ]/16" x 2-'//8" 5LOTTE HOLE FOR ~ I/2" NOMINAL DIAMETE~ SCHEDULE 40 PIPE, U-BOLT AITH DOUBLE NUT5 AND AASHERS. (~P) ~q/lC" x ]/8" SL¢TED HOLE FOR I-I/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER PIPE NOTE: OVERSIZE U-BOLT PROVIDED TO ALLOH +/- 2" TILT/ADJUSTMENT TO ACHIEVE TOLERANCE. (SUPPLfED DY LUCENT) ¢2 AHG (TYP 2 PLCS) MOUNT]N~ BRACKET " ' PLATE EXISTING LEG AT lBO' ABOVE 2 HOLE LUG :¢2 AHG DC?i CIGBE GROUND -- TO MI~D :~2 AHG ~PS ANTENNA ~OUNTIN~ ~AOKET BURNDY TYPE GAR (TYP 2 PLCS) HOLES FOR ADJUSTMENT /2"¢ COAX CABLE MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS PER MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD ¢6 AH® ~ROUNDING KIT CABLE (PROVIDED HITH KIT) 5ILL OF: MATerIALS QUANTITY DESC..~IPTI ON I-I/4" NOMINAL DIAMETE~ sch. 40 x 18" LC. MIN 55 OR CALV. PIPE PLATE I/4 x 4-1/4 x 18-1/4" LC. ~ALV.(A-36) I STD. U-BOLT FOR 3 ]/2" NOMINAL DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PIPE ~/OOUDLE HEX NUTS AND ~SHE~, 5ALV. STD U-BOLT FOR I I/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER PIPE ~/DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND ~5HER, ~ALV. (SEE NOTE 3) 2 I Ps MOUNTIN® DETAIL Ilxlq SCALE: I i/2"=1'-0" DGESI ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4334 Lou Moglino, AJA ARCHITECT NJ - ¢~ A113345 NY - ¢~ 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - ¢~ GE 36209 NY - ¢/- 075384 CT - ¢~ 22375 PA - ¢¢ 061412 DATB metroPCS New York, L.L.C. SlT~ Jot~,~: NYTDI~ HTM JOB:~, O'~I'4PSTSOOS SITE INFOt~,F'1ATI ON ~TIdO~ ~OLJT~Z ~D TOI, N,N OF- 5OUTHOL:D DESI®N 60LOCATION SHEET TITLE 05/Ob/Oq UTILITY FRAME ELEVATIONS 8 ®PS MOUNTIN® DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (TYP. OF mx. , . , , , L I GROUP z I REAR OF CABINET5 ~ ~ , A R C H I T E C T U R E ~ I .... I ...... I - ..... i ~, [ = N :El 7 7 ~ 7 E N G I N E E R I N G ' ~- ' ~,~ .~ I ........ ~ o ~ I o ~ I o F o i, o . t~ I I P.O. BOX3 1'-2" I ~ I I ~ I I - I FUTURE HO~OELL x ~ PROPOSED MODOELL I ~1 I ~ZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 ~ ~ ~ ~ I _, OA~IN~T x OA~IN~T ' OABINET 6A~IN~T I w -' TEL: 73 2.8 88.6 2 ] 0 ~ ' ~ I i ~ - - I I ~ I B~15 [ I ~ i I I ~ I ~xl5 I F~: 732.847.4334 ~1~ ....... W -- ~ [__ _. 7 I ' ~l o _ __~1 o ~1~ I.[ 7 ~ I ] J L ~' ARCHITEcTLOH MO o, A~ STRUCTu~R°bert W. Toms,ENGi~ERP.E- T 4 I I ] - I I I I NJ - ~ A113345 NJ - ¢ GE 36209 ~ L _.. j [ _ j I_ J L J/ ~- ¢ 028992-1 ~' ~ 075384 ~ ~ FRONT OF CABINET5 CT - ~ 22375 ,k ,I ~ ~ IN~ ¢ PA - ~ 061412 ~ + 2./2''¢ HILT' HIT NY'IBC ~[TH 4 1/2,, ~iN. E~BE~ENT. U I¢'xlB'x¢" TMICK CONCRETE / NOTES: FUTURE I. TOP OF STEEL ELEVATION I¢" ABOVE ~ADE LEVEL. I¢'x]4'x¢" TNIC~ OONORETE PAP 2. FO~ ~OMNTIN~ NOLE LOCATION5 SEE DETAIL 2/A-B. (SEE DETAIL 3/A-~) I 24xD6 SOALE: ~/4"=l'-0" [Ixl~ SOALE, D/8"=]'-O" I 24xD6 SOALE: ~/4"=1'-0" 08/~1/0~ ISLED Fo~ OONSTRUOTION Hxl~ ~/~"= I'-O" I PROPOSEO 8" THICK 4000 PSI OONORETE SLAB 2 LAYERS OF 6x6-8/8 ~ELDED BIRE PAB~IO. SEE X L4x4xl/4 (BEYOND) STEEL TO BE PLUMB AND SEAL PROPOSED CHAMFERED D~E ~ J EXISTINO O~ADE ~ ' i- , ~~,,~ ~L,, ~ ~ ~ ~, FINISH 6RADE 9 ~. :7 -- ¢ ..... E~DEDNENT. 5TAGGE~ DOLT5 AT ~ (SEE DETAIL D/A-5) (BEYOND) (TTP.) EXISTIN5 UNDISTURDEO VI~81N SOIL ~'-9" O.C. EACH SIDE OF ~EB ~ SCALE: ~/4"= I'-O" FUTURE SITE INFORMATION I I I I I ~ATTERT CADINET - ,,, ' ~ ' ' ~ COLOCATION ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ TOP OF CONCRETE ~ FU~RE ~ ~ODCELL BATTERY ~ FUTURE ~ / I I I CA,INET CA~INET ~ BATTERY I ~6 %_,~1 L .... J Il , , ~T~P OF CONCRETE PAD ~ H ~ADE ' ' '"* '" ' ' ' ',"" ," ',, ' FOUNDATION DETAILS AND l¢'x14'x8" PAD (SEE DETAIL ~/A-5) DETAIL ~/A-5)~ Ilxlq SCALE: 1/4"=1'-O" 124x~e SCALE: 1/2"=1'-O" Ilxlq SCALE: I/4"=1'-O" 24x56 SCALE: I/2"=1'-O" Ilx17 $OALE: 24xD6 DESIGN° ID l._J P.x ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX3 HAZEET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEl: 732.888.6210 F~: 732.847.4334 Eou Mog~no, A~ Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCH~ECT STRUCTU~L ENGI~ER NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 NY - ¢~ 075384 TOP O~ ~EN6~ ~ PA - v~ 061412 I I/2"¢ (INNER DIAMETER) Y4ELDEI2 ~ATE P~AM~ (?FPICAL OF 2) P~OVI~E (I) FOrKeD LATOH ASSEMBLY AND PADLOCK EYE (TO PERMIT IO'-O" OPERATION PROM EITHER SIDE OF CATE) / 4'-0" ,' / I I/2"¢ (INNE~ DIAMETER) 5OHEDULE 40 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~AIL (~PIGAL 8 TOP, ~]D · ~ X X k X X X X X ~ · ., x x x x x x x x x x ,., 9 ., x x x x x x x x x ¢/. - ~ - A ,' ' , . - .... '" PESO~IPTION ,, % ~ ..... ;, / x .... ~' ' ' / ~IAMETER) SCHEDULE 40 CORNER POST ,..,,. ~-/~ ,,, ,,,,, , ,,~ ~ /,, II 5AU6E 5ALVANIZED (2" ME$H) CHAIN .... ~ . ' :-/: }t, LINK FENCE FADRIC ',: ,, ,, OOMPOUND SURFACIN¢ New York~ L,L,C. /,%. -' :.// ~ ~ 12"¢x4'-0" DEEP POST FOOTINg. FILL ~NITH ,, ' .¥ x, -:~ < "4TH .JO~,'~, OqMP~T~O0~ 4000 PSI CONORETE. (TYPICAL) :'/ ' ,,} / ~ ,: ~ SITE INFORMATION EXiSTIN~ SOIL I ..":,, ~ PE~IMETE~ OF OONPOUND, SUPPORT BJTH 5/4"x4"x20" ~00~ 5TAKE5 4'-0" ON CENTER R~o Skf. 05105/0q SHEET TITLE FE~NOE ~ ®ATE ~t=TAILS I I FENCE AN~ ®ATE ELEVATION x4'-b 112"+/- LONO %~.~/ A R C H I T E C T U R E ] ,i TO~R L~5 PROPOSED ~ZLET, NEWJERSEY 0~30 ~. E~UA: NJ - $ A113345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 ~ ~- ~ 028992-1 ~' ~ 075384 CT - ~ 22375 ~ x ~ ~- ~f~ ~UPPO~T TU~ , PA - 2 061412 , :: TO~ER 2 ~/~ll~PIP~ ~AST SUPPORT TO FRAME t A (~P. OF ~ PER FRANE) (SEE DETAIL 2/A-q) O~/~l/Oq 15~EO FOR OONSTRUGTION ~EVI&ION 2~A~b STANDOFF F~AME OR APPROVED EQUAL = I ~ ~ MOUNTED TO TO~ER SUPPORT PROPOSED NOTE: PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTIN¢ FRAME DEPICTED IS BY: SITE : ; SEAL -- t~OOgR CZIP 15 05~R AV~N~ HA~PPAU~E, NY AN APPROVE~ EGUAL MAY BE UTILIZE~. ~ Z~ ~ " [ L ANTENNAIT--A~M PLAN. V[E~ 2,ANTENNApER 5EOTOR)(TYP' OF ~ ~'4'oF ~4~'V ~ ~%/I/°' ILxlW FRAME (TYP. OF 2 [~ FOR THB EXOLUSlV~ USS B~ THE TITLE GLIENTI ANY 2 ~18" O.D. RIPE TO FRAME (TYP. 5 [/2'l O.D. PIPE OF 2 PER FRAME) x4'-8 I/2"+/- LON~ ~ 2 ~/~" o.~. ~w Y~ k,L~, ] f HORIZONTAL PIPE H.S.5. ~'Ix~'IxI/4'I 2 ~/8I' 0.~. STIFFENE~ A~M PIPE TO~ - PART ~USF-2U , - TUBE (TYP.) T~E-BABK TO EXISTIN~ TO~ER ~ ~ + ~ PROPOSED I ' ~ = , ~ PROPOSED 51TE PRO ~ ANTENNA (~P. OF ~ [= Z I MODEL¢ USFIO-2q6 ~]~N T~P~: I = ~ I I ITl ] 2, PER SECTOR) [; ~ ~ ~ STANDOFF FRAME TO ~ ~ ¢~ ~O~ r ~ / GOLOGATION ~ ., ~; PANEL ANTENNAS . R~e SS~ O5/O8/Oq PROPOSED SiTE PRO I HODEL~ ,815,,+/ USFIO-2~8 STANOOFF FRAHE OR L ' ~ '- -- SHEET TITLE APPROVEO EQUAL ~OUNTED TO TO~ER SUPPORT PROPOSE2 PANEL 5 I/2'l O.O. PiPE ANTENNA MOUNT AN~ ANTENNAS I/2"+/- I I-~Il+/- CABLE LADDER DETAIL5 LON~ (BEYOND) Ilxl~ 56ALE:5/¢" = I'-0I' 24x56 56ALE: I/4" = L'lOll IlxlW 50ALE:5/bI': I'-0'l 24x58 SCALE: I/4" = II-Oil IIxIW 5GALE:N.T.5. 24x~8 SCALE: N.T.S. DESIGNo -' GROUP5 v v U ' ' ] ARCHITECTURE 2'-~ ~/~" PLAN ·PTC BOX ~ / ,,, ~ZLET, NEW JERSEY 0~30 , J25" 5052-~32 ALUMINUMN ; TEL: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 2 1 0 FLOOR z v ~ ~ - T~PE 3R OUTDOOR F~: 7 3 2.8 4 7.4 3 3 4 ' THERHOSTATICA '. _. AREA ~'~' , % '. , '-, ' ' = =' Lou Mog~o, A~ Robert W. Toms, P.E. ~', %'~ ",. ',,',, x' ' ', ',, ', % '- x ', , ~ ~CHITECT STRUC~ ENGINEER ~~" ""~%5 ..... : , , ] CONT~OLLEO COOLING ~ ------ ~ - NJ - ~ A113345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 ~ ~ FAN ~ITH T~O 12xl2xl ~ - ¢ 075384 _~ , o ASH~AE MEDIUM ~ADE ~' ~ 028992-1 CT- ~ 22375 h D ~ NEA % FILTERS PA - ~ 061412 ~ ,~...~,~ , ..... ~ ~ IlOJ-~51-200HO ' %" ' ' , ' PONER TELGO 2'-~" ~ O ] FOR TELCO ~ ' ~ (TYP) / ~ / ~ _t COMPARTMENT ,' ~ ~ ~ ~ I '-5" 5" - ~ ~ Ob/D/Oc ISSUED FOR OONBT~OTION des I REVIDION ~A~N ~ ~ ~ ~ MOUNTING BRACKET TEMPLATE ~=v. =ATE ~ESO~IPTION Dr ~ .... _ o = TH~ ~ADINET INOO~PORATE~ DOTH A~ AN~ TEL~O PLAN EOUIPMENT CABINET ~ o ~, . THO ~NTERLOOKED 200 AHP MAIN BREAKERS AND A 24 /~'5~7 ;:'?/ '~" "-': -' - _ _ ~/ SPECIFICATION. IN ADDITION, THE COMPONENT5 ARE -- EQUIPHENT CABINET TO NE~ ~ co~e~ o~ "~HE ~T~ O~S~eN ~OU~, ~NC" ANO ST~L DUNNASE A5 ~E~ D ID/16" ~ ~ 2'-4 ~/1~" ~ ~ DESIGNED TO NEET THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE, NANUPACTURERSSPEOIFICATIONS D'-I I3/[&" 2 I PTO OADINET SPEOIFIOATIONS ~ IIxlW 50ALE: N.T.5. 24x30 5OALE: N.T.5. ~T: 2432 LBS FULLY E~UIPPED NITH BATTERIES / ~{ , 2'-~ ~/1~" 2'-4 ~/1¢" 4 3/18" 1'-3 3/10" 4 ~/1~" ~~ ~ A~R FILTER COVER 2'-4 ~/18" ~ ' ' ' ' ~ ~ I SIT~ INFO~MATION ~ ~ I TO~N OF SOUTHOLD ~ - ~ ......... = MOUNTING TEMPLATE ~ ~ ~ , 5 F o ~,~ , MOUNTING TEMPLATE COLOCATION ' ~ ~ P~OPOSED A~EA: ~ ~ / ~¢ SS~ 05/05/0q SECURE NEN METRO PCS AREA FOR (I)NODCELL OADINET- ~53~5" x 32": 7.87 SQ. FT. N ~ SHEET TITLE EQUIPMENT OABINET TO AREA FOR (I) BATTERY OABINET- 28.5q" x 28,14": 5.11 SQ. FT. ~ NEH 5~EL DUNNAOE AS % , ' PER NANUFAOTURER5 AREA FOR (I) FTC CABINET - 30" x 12" = 2.5 5~. FT. ¢ ,. , ~ L - '~- ~ 5PEOIPIOATION5 TOTAL AREA OF OABINET5 - 3.93' + 5.~1' + 2.5' = I~.0~ 5~. FT. 0 ~ EQUIPMENT SPEOIFIOAT[ONS . ' PLAN · BAKERY SHEET NUMBER I I EQUIPMENT OADIN~T 5PEOIFIOAT]ONS 5 ] ASSUM~,DATT~ CABINET SPEOIFIGATION5~ ~ 0 IIxIW ~OAL~= N.T.S 24x~8 $OALE: N.T.$ IIxIW SOALE= N.T.S, N.T.S. DESIGN° GROUP5 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4334 Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. A~ ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - ~/A113345 NJ - # GE 36209 NY- i8 028992-1 NY- ~ 075384 CT - ~4 22375 _~5052-HH2 ALUMINUPI POHDER COAT FINISH PA - ~ 061412 IIII Ilt, li, ' ~i~_ ~ii_~- S~UARE D, T'-pE ~o LOAD CENTER //~ JJ~ ~ J I ~ % . Ill - HINOED DEADFRONT IIl il ~F61 OON~NIENOE OUTLET , ~ ~ ,,, ,~, IIII ~m~m, II ~ ~ 1'4 ' ' '"' "~ III J ~~ ~ I !1 ~ I ~.' ~11 TSJ 5E~1/5 TI 5URSE SUPPRESSION (OPTIONAL)' ' ~ ~ ~ i ,~ rr .:n, New Yo~ L,L,C, HIND 5TO SITE INFOrmATION ~ .THERNOD+ATIGALLY CONTROLLED GOOLIN~ FAN (OPTI~ONAL) NITH TNO 12xJ2xl A5HRAE TO~N GOLOGATION NOTE= THE TELOO AREA OONTAIN A PLYWOOD DAOKBOARD, NHIGH ALLO~S A VARIE~ OF EQUIPNENT TO DE ORA~N NOUNTEO :PER CUSTONER SPECIFICATIONS. THE SPEOIFIG FEATURES OF THE TELCO CABINET INCLUDE: - ~/4" P~YHOOD BACKBOARD - THERMOSTATICALLY -OONTROLLED PAN (~O") F - 12-POSITION 5ROUN~ ~AR (OPTIONAL)( CHEET TITLE - 12-POSITION TERMINAL 5TRIP (OPTIONAL) -TRANSTEOTOR T-I LINE 5U~eE SUPPRESSER (OPTIONAL) i PTO OA~IN~T ~TAIL SHEET NUNDE~ REV. Ilxf'7 SOALE: N.T.5 I24x~O SCALE: N.T.S '~ ~ '- ~- A~C HITECTU RE B I~O~ O° ~DT O° BPT TXf~X KATH~IEN ~00-i0504 TX/~X 125~ I 5/g" I DLU~ ~ N ~ I N ~ ~ ~ ~ZL~, NEWJE~SEY 0~30 O° ~T ~o EDTTX/~X TX/~X 125~ I 5/5" 2 ~EEN ~: 732.847.4334 ' ~ Ecu ~og~o, A~ Ao~c~t W. ~oms, P.E. ~4.1" x ~,1" = 232' ~ FT, ~C~ITECT STRUC~ ENGI~ER F~ONT VIE~ ~[DE VIE~ NJ - ~ A113345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 ~ ~- ~ 028992-1 ~' ~ 075384 CT - ~ 22375 PA - ~ 061412 S~AL ALPHA ALPHA ~ETA BETA 5ANNA BETA I ~'/ BILL O~ ~ATE~IALB ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA ~ ~ ¥ '~~ NO. 3 ATO~SJSO WS"~ AIROELL COAXIAL CABLES TRILO57 O0~UNIGATIONS, INC ~UPLIOATION O~ USE ~ITHOUT ~XP~S~ ~I~N 5 ~K-S,SAC ,/8"~ROUNDK,T T~ILO~, ~O~MUNICATIONS, INO ~ OABLE2 F OADLE ~ ~ OABLE 4 F OADLE5 FOABLE 0 F 8 24 DFAI5850 I 5/8"~ ~/1~ DIN (F) CONNECTOR TRILOSY COHHUNICATION5, INO a ~ New Yo~ L.L.C. ~ 24 ' CK-S~58AC I 5/8" 5~OUND KIT TRILOSY OOHNUNICATIONS, INC i ~ IT~ PA~T NU~DE~ QTY. I0 24 0~-UI258 I 5/8" ~ATHERPAOOFIN5 KIT T~ILO~% OOH~UNICATIONS, INO OADLE I ~0 10012 (1~1.2') II 24 6' JAUOI2DNDN5 I/2"¢ ~U~P~ ~/1~ OlN (~) OONNEOTO~S TR[LOCY OOMHUNIOATIONS, lEO ~ ~ED OADLE 2 ~60 I000~ (1~.4') I SITE JOB~. ~2 6 REMOTE ELECTRICAL TILT KATH~JEN ~ BLUE CABLE 3 8~0 I00¢0 (32.8') I --~ 5REIN CABLE 4 8¢0 IO00q (16.4') I NTH ~0~, 13 ~ ANTENNA -NOOEL ~ 800 10504 KATHRIEN ANTENNA OADLIN~ NOTES OA~LE 6 ~¢0 IO00q (L6.4') I I. OOLO~ED ELEGTRIOAL TAPE SHALL ~ARK EAOH ENDOF EVE~YCADLEASOLOSETOEAOH ENDAS~ ~ ~ O~ ~OU TERMINATE IN ROU 860 10025 6 OONI N~ POSSIBLE. PANEL ANTENNA PP6 CABINET 2. IN A~ITION TO TAPE MARKINg5, EAOH END O~ ~'-0' 5TANDAR~ JU~PZ~5 AT BT5 ~O~N O~ EVERY OABLE SHALL ALSO BE LA,BLED H~TH BRASS ~ --Tv GABLE5 AND COLO~ OF TAPE HA~KINSS AS INDICATED IN~ ~-0' STANDARO JUmPErS ONSION THE ABOVE SCHEMATIC. TH~S SYSTEH 15 TO BE USED FOR ALL COLO~S. k% BTS 3. ALL TAPE MARKINOS SHOULD BE DONE IN SEQUENCE F~OM THE NORTH AORKIN~ CLOC~AISE AS 5HO~N IN THE 56HENATIC ABOVE. ~PIOAL SECTOR CABLE ROUTIN6 O~A~N BY: OH~CKEO BT: PATE: 4. THE CONTRAOTOR SHALL INSTALL ANTENNA AND JUNPE~ CABLED ~ITH O~IP LOOPS TO P~EVENT HINI~U~ CABLE BENOlN~ ~AOIU¢ ~O ~ UNDESIRABLE ~ATER RUN-OFF. OADL/ ~ADIU~ SHEET TITLE 5. THE CONT~AOTO~ SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL CABLE SUPPORTS AS NEEDEO TO HAINTAIN A HINI~UH 5PAOIN5 OF 3'-0" ON C~NTER. ~ I ~O~,A,%I o. CON7~ACTO~ ~l:L *ECO*O TH~ LOCATION SERIAL NUMBERS OF ALL ANTENNAS, ANTENNA WS"O (ATO~SJSO) I0" OONTROLLER HOTORS, AND THEIR OORRESPONOIN5 I-5/8"0 (ATISSJSO) 20" INSTALLED LOCATION AT THE TI~E OF CONSTRUOTION. SHEET NUMBER ~. ALL ANDRE~S MOTORS ARE ~ENDER SPECIFIC, AND ~ILL BE ~l~E~ STARTIN5 ~ITH THE MALE END OF THE CABLE AT THE UTS ANO CONTINUE ALON5 THE RUN FOLLO~IN5 THE "FEMALE UP ~OLE". ~ ~ ANTENNA CABLE SCHEMATIC I lxl~ SOALE: NOT TO 50ALE 24xD¢ SOALE: ANTENNA SCHEE)ULB GABLE ~CHE~ULE ~X/TX NIANUFACTUt~Ef~ 1,4OI?BL¢ CABLE LEN®TH ~IA. LABEL ~T 0° ED%TX/~X ~ATH~IEN 800-10504 TX/~X 125~ I 5/8" I ~E~ H~T 0~ EDT TX/~X TX/~X 125~ I 5/~" 2 ~ ~DT 0~ E~T TX/~X ~ATH~IEN 800-i0D04 TX/~X 125Z I 518" I BLUE ~DT 0° E~T TX/~X TX/~X 12~Z I 5/5" 2 BLUE ~OT D= E~T TX/~X ~ATH~IEN 800-10504 TX/RX 125~ I 5/8" I ~REEN ~T D° EOT TX/~X TX/RX 125~ I 5/8" 2 ~REEN BILL OF bIATE~IALS NO. C2T"<. OESC~IPTION 'qANUFACTURER I I HODCELL .UCENT 2 I EZBFO BATTERY CABINET .UCENT S ATO'/SJSO W8"¢ AIROELL OOAXIAL CABLES TRILOS~ 4 DFAO~850 ~18"0 ff/l¢ DIN (F) CONNEOTOR TRILOGY OOHNUNrOATION5, INO 5 ~K-SqSAC q/8" ~OUND KIT 'RILO~Y OONHUNICATIONS, O OS-UI2q8 q/8" NEATHERPROOFIN¢ KIT TRILOSY OONNUNIOATIONS, lNG q 1,500 L~ ATI58JSO I 5/8"~ AIROELL OOAXIAL OADLE5 T~ILOOY COMMUNICATIONS, 8 24 DFAI5850 I 5/~"~ ~/1~ ~1~ (F) CONNECTOR T~ILO~Y COHHUNICATIONS, INO q 24 OK-SI58AC I 5/8" 5~OUND KIT TRILOOY 60HNUNIOATION5, lEO I0 24 C5-UI258 I 5/8" ~ATHERP~OOFIN5 KIT TRILOGY ~OHNUNICATIONS, II 24 6' JAUOI2DNDN5 I/2"e JUNPE~ WI6 DIN (Y) CONNEOTORS T~ILOSY ~O~HUNIOATIONS, ~2 6 ~ENOTE ELE~TRIOAL TILT :ATHRiEN 13 6 ANTENNA -NOOEL ~ 500 10504 KATH~IEN ITEhd PAi~.T NUNBE~-. QTY. CABLE I 860 10012 (IBI.2') I GABLE 2 880 IO00¢f (I0.4') I CA~LE 4 8~0 IO00q (16.4') I OA~LE 5 860 10060 (~2.8') I OA~LE O 800 IO00q (LO.4') I ROU 8~0 10025 ~ I. ELEGTRIG: PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 208V OR 240V, 2P, S ~IRE GIRGUIT FROM A RELIABLE SOUROE TO THE GOivI~UNrGATION CABINET. THIS AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR I~B MASTER ~ROUND BAR SOURGE SHALL BE LOOKED ON ~ITH A O~ LO0~. THE OONT~AGTO~ 5HALL ~OMIOE (~) SFA~E FU~ES ~HE~ME~ A ~U~EO OIS~ONNEOT I~ A~ A~OME ~NISHEO ~ADE ~ 5EOTO~ 5~OUND 2. UTILI~ NETE~: I~ A UTILITY METE~ 15 5PEOIFIE~ ON THE ~AHIN~5, IT IS THE OONT~AOTO~5 ~ESPONSIDILITW TO OBTAIN ALL NEGESSA~Y E~T ELECT~IOAL ~ETALLIO PNL PANEL A R C ~ I T E C T U R E INSPEOTIONS, GUT-IN GA~5, ETO., THAT ARE ~E~UI~E~ TO 5ET THE METER. THE OONTRAGTO~ 5HALL gEET HITH THE UTILI~ OOMPANY TO VE~IF~ TUDIN~ PP POHER PANEL [ N ~ I N E E R I N ~ETER AN~ TAP LOOATION P~IO~ TO INDTALLATION. THE A~GHITEGT DE¢IN5 THE PAPERWORK HJTH THE VARIOUS UTILITT GO~PANiE5 AND GAN ~ND ~OUND PPG PO~D~ PROTDGTION OADINET P~OVIDE THE ELEGT~IGAL DETAILE~5 NA~E ANP PHONE NU~DE~. OONTAOT THE AROHITEOT FO~ UTILITW RELATE~ ~UESTIONS. IF TE~PO~A~ NO PETAL GLAD GABLE PVO POL~VINYL GHLO~I~E P.O. BOX 3 PO~E~ 15 ~E~UI~E~, ALL NEO AN~/O~ LOOAL ELEOT~I6 GODE5 5HALL DE A~HE~ED TO. CONTAOT METRO POS HI~ELES5 P~IOR TO ~AKIN~ ~OD ~AIN OI~GUIT D~EAKE~ RA ~I~ID ALU~INU~ ZLET, NEW JERSEY OW30 TEMPORARY PO~ER OONNEOTIONS. MPP MAIN PlSTRIDUTION PANEL ~¢5 ~ISID CALVANIZE~ STEEL TEL: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 21 0 ~. TELEPHONB:PROWIDE A 2" OONPUIT ~ITH A 25 PAI~ ~22 A~O TAPPAN ~I~E AND OABL~ ¢ 2250DB2~/~T/DB/BK~LAOK OR EQUAL BY ~P HEATHER PROOF OO~MSOO~E ~ROM THE OONMUNIOATION5 OADINET TO THE PAIN DEHARGATION POINT. F~OM THE PPG OADINET TO THE DTS, P~OVIPE Jumpor: F~: 7 3 2.8 4 7.4 3 3 4 5UPPLIE~: 5TON~ POINT ~N: CPSNTOI-40 (40 ~T 1~OSffSPE) 40 FOOT LENOTH ~ITH 4-~45 OONNEOTO~5 O~I~PE~ ON ON~ EN~. [o~ Mog no, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. THE ~AIN DE~A~ATION POINT ALLO~5 ~O~ THE LEAST ANOUNT O~ NOISE AN~ THE HOST ANOUNT O~ ~OTBOTJON. FOR DOST SAVINg5, A A~CH[TECT STEUCTU~ENGZNEER CLOSER DENAROATION POINT NA~ BE SPECIFIED ~N NULTIPLE CTO~Y BUIL~IN~5 PITH THB APPROVAL O~ THE TELEPHONE OO~PANY. ~O~ NE~ NJ- ¢AI 13345 NJ- ¢ GE 36209 TELEPHONE 5E~VIOE5 IN N~, N~ ~ O% ~OVI~ A 4" OON~UIT ~ITH A ~A~LINE ~RO~ THE 5PEOINIE~ UTILI~ POLE TO THE LOOATION OF THE DENAROATION ~OINT.~' 028992-1 ¢ 075384 CT - 22375 4. OONDUIT ROUTIN~: THZ ~OUTIN~ O~ THE GON~UIT 5HALL DE 5UGH THAT THE BASIEST AN~ POST ~AOTIOAL ~ETHO~5 ARE UCED ~ITHOUT PA-¢ 061412 IMPAOTIN~ THE DUIL~IN~ OHNE~ AN~ THE AE~THETIO APPEAL O~ THE DOlLYINg. DEOAUSE THE HORK BEINO PONE IS IN EXI$TiN~ STrUCTUrES, IT IS A ~P055[DLE TO 5HOH EVERY JUNOTION BOX, LB, OONDUIT DEN~, ET~. IN A THO ~[WENSIONAL PLAN. IT 15 FO~ THJ5 ~EASON THAT THE THAT BUILDINg. WIRING ETHODS LEGEND ~08/31/0~ ISSUEO FOR CONST~OTION I. ~ENE~AL: ALL HI~IN~ IN FINISHED A~EAS SHALL ~E OONOEALEO UNLESS NOTE~ OTHE~HISE. IN UNFINISHED A~EAS 5UOH AS BASEMENTS, ~VISloN m~AH~ CHKm. 2. ~ELO~ ~RADE (UNDER~OUN~ IN EARTH OR FILL): ALL OON~UIT5 5HALL HAVE A ~INI~UM ~U~IAL ~EPTH OF 24". ~ANOH OI~OUIT$ 5HALL NE NE~ ~L~OT~IO NT N~ OONSIST OF PULLE~ OON~UOTO~5 IN ~I~EOT BU~IE~ 50HEDULE 40 PVO OON~UITS. OONDUIT5 THAT A~E BU~IE~ UN~ER EARTH THAT HAVE HEAV% TELEPHONE 55HE~ULE 80 PVO. P~IOR TO EXCAVATION, A UTILI~ ~A~K OUT SHALL BE ~ONE TO LOGATE EXleTINO UNPE~OUN~ UTILITIES. PICTURES 5HALL TELEPHONE [{'~ 5USPEN=E= C EILIN¢S OR ~ITHIN ~, AALL5 $HALL OONS IST OF ~PE MO PETAL GLAD GABLE IF ALLOAED BY G OPE. OONNEO TION, TO -T EX I$TINO TELEPHONE ~:"~ OOHMUNIOATfON OADINET5 AN~ VID~ATIN~ EQUIPMENT 5HALL OONSIST OF PULLE~ OONDUOTO~5 IN FLEXIBLE ~ETALLI~ ~ON~UIT, MAXI~U~ ~' IN THI¢ ~OOUMENT I~ TH~ D~SleN, 4. OUTO00~S O~ INOO0~50LASSIFJEO 'DAMP' O~ '~ET' LOOATJON: ALL ~EEDE~5 AND BRANCH OI~CUIT5 SHALL OONSIST OF PULLED co~se~T DP TH~ ~REATOR 15 ~TRIOTL~ PROHIBIT~O. OONOUOTO~S IN ~S ¢ONOUIT OONNEOTIONS TO O0~UNIOATION OABIN~T AN~ VI~RATIN~ E~UIP~ENT SHALL OONSIST OP PULLEO CONOUOTO~S IN LI~UI~ TIGHT FLEXIBLE STEEL OONOUIT, ~AXI~U~ 6' I~ LENGTH. New Yo , L.L.C. SPECIAL EMPHASIS, CONCERNS, AND LIMITATIONS SYMBOLS I. THE A~OHITEOT 5HALL ~E NOTI~I~ IMME~IATELT UPON ~I$OOV~R~ OF A P~OBLE~ O~ OONFLIOT. 60NT~AOTO~ $HALL P~O~PTL~ ~ 5AFE~ $HITOH ~ I~ENTIF~ ONE O~ MO~E P~OPOS~P 50LUTION5 ~UT 5HALL NOT P~OOEE~ UNTIL 50 AUTHO~IZ~P. i PANEL BOARD ~ NEH UTJLI~ POLE LIMITATION¢ ON I. GOOR~INATE ALL ~ISCONNECTFONS ANP INTERRUPTION5 OF ELEOT~IOAL SERVICE ANP ~OUNPlN~ SYSTE~ HITH THE OHNE~. A 50HEDULE OF INTErrUPTIONS ANP SHUTDOWNS SHALL ~E SUD~ITTEP TO THE ONNE~ ~OR APPROVAL. THE SOHEPULE O~ INTERRUPTIONS SHALL DE ~ ELEO~IOAL ~IRIN~ ~O ~ SU~MJTTEO TO THE O~NE~ A MINIMUM OF T~O PEEKS PRIO~ TO AN~ ANTIOIPATEP INTErrUPTION OF 5E~VIOE ANP SHALL DE APPROVED (TU~NIN~ UP) D~ THE O~NE~ ~E~O~E AN~ INTErrUPTION 15 PB~ITTEO. 5H~T TITL~ ~ ~ ELECT~IOAL ~ OONNUNIOATIONS OABINETINfOrmATION I. EAOH OONT~AOTO~ SHALL SE~U~E AND PA% FO~ ALL ~E~UIRE~ PE~ITS AND SHALL A~AN~E ALL ~EQUI~EO INSPEOTIONS. 2. NAOH OONT~AOTO~ SHALL COOrdINATE HIS ~O~K PITH THE PORK OF ALL OTHE~ OONTRAOTO~S AN~ EXISTIN~ FIELD OONDITIONS. ~ , DACKDOAR~ SHEET NUN ER 0 EXISTIN~ C, SC CAB]NET. EXISTIN~ POLE TO N'IA.<E TAP FROM EXISTIN® UTILITY' POLE :~25q TO NEH METRO PCS POLE iN COMPOUND. PROPOSED UTILI'I'Y POLE. PROVIDE NEH 2DCA BY'PASS UTILITY' APPROVED METER SOC'<ET MOUNTED ON POLE. PROVIDE NEW 200A, 25OV, NEMA D FUSED LOC.<ABLE DISCONNECT MOUNTED ON POLE. PROVIDE (2) 2DCA, 25OV FUSES. NEH FTC CABINET FOR ELECTRIC AND TELCO. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAHINm.~S FOR MOUNTING. GROUND TO EXISTING TOHEf~ GROUND. MASTER GP. OUND BAR. CONNECT 2~2 SOLID TINNED ~ROUND HIRES TO NEH ®ROUND RING. PROVIDE NEH ~2 SOLID TINNED COPPER ®ROUND RING 18' t~ELOH GRADE. PROVIDE 5/8"XIO' COPPER GROUND ROD AND CAD Y'~ELD TO GROUND RING. PROVIDE NEH TEST HELL FOR GROUND ROD. ~2 SOLID TtNNED CONDUC, TOR (TY'P) TO BE CONNECTED TO POSTS AND OTHER METAL OBJECTS. PROPOSED TELCO AND ELECTRICAL CONDUITS ROUTED UNDERGROUND. I,S]TF'ANO C,,ONDUIT LE®ENI2 11×17 SCALE: OONOUIT 5~2 ~ 1~6G 3#4 ,$ 2~10 * 2=12 ,$ 0-4 HOUt~. MECHANICAL TIMER IN NEMA D~. -- IENOLOSU~.E TOt~.F--. ~ ASO4H O~. E~UIVALENT. ~/O A~I®, :~4~ - 2" CONDUIT UTILITY ~,ONDUIT ~ ~4 ~ - I-I/4" CONDUIT BTS TELCO DEMARC TO EQUIPMENT GROUNID HIRE ABOVE GROUND) I ~4/O 2~2 TINNED 2 ONE LINEt ,ISE SC, HEb'1ATIC. Ilx17 SCALE: N.T.S. 24xB6 SCALE: N.T.S. NONE DESIGN'O GROUP5 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX3 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 TEL: 732.888.6210 FAX: 732.847.4334 Lou Moglino, AIA ARCHITECT NJ - ~ A113345 NY - # 028992-1 Robert W. Toms, P.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - ~ GE 36209 NY - ~ 075384 CT - # 22375 PA - # 061412 Ob/D/oq DATE SEAL metroPCS New York, L.L.C. 51TE JOB#: N¥7515 i,4T~ .~o~,, Oqt'4PSTSOO8 SITF: INFOP-,h4ATION COLOC~ATION RNffe S5~ 05/Ob/O~ SH~T TITL~ SHE~ET NU~BEt~ I'~It~,E TO THE ®ROUND RIN®. ARCHITECTURE ~ 2. ~=Ot~, LEgS FZNG~ IN~TALLATION5 BOND ALL E N G I N E E R I N GO~N~ ~NG~ PO~T5 ~OM ~OUN~ ~IN~ TO A P. O. BOX 3 "Y" TYPE GAPHEL~ TO F~NGE POST VIA CLAMP. COAX ~OUN~ COAX ~OUND KIT AT KIT AT (THONA& ~ DZTT& ¢2 OR APPRO~E~ ~UAL) ~Z~ET, NEWJE~S/YO~30 ANTENNA ANTENNA BOND ALL ~ATE ~O5T5 AN~ ~ATE F~A~E& ~JTH TEE: 732.888,6210 " ~ A ~IN[NU~ OF I/O OOPPE~ PLEX AND E~IOO F~: 732.847.4334 / E~UAL. Lou Logic, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. __~ ARCHITECT STRUC~ ENGINEER ~-- D. ALL COAXIAL GABLe5 ~HALL DE ~OUNDED TO NJ - ~ A113345 NJ - ~ GE 36209 ~ A UNINSULAT~ ~OUN~ DA~ VIA GADLE ~-~ 028992-1 ~' ~ 075384 ~ ~UN~ KITS. N~TON INST~UMNNT G~M~AN~ ~ CT-~ 22375 fl EQUAL. THI~ ~OUNO ~A~ SHALL DE LOCATED PA- 061412 , UNIN5ULAT~O ~ JUST D~LO~ THE ~OINT ~HE~E ALL I ~ouN~ ~A~ ~ GOM~ TO~NTHZ~ ANO ~NSG~ND DO~N THE I TO OLA . ALL COAXIAL L AWN A CONNUNIOATION OADINET SHALL DE /x OR E~UAL. THIS ~ROUN~ DA~ 5HALL BE I ~EVISION D~A~bOHKD. 5. 2~2 SOLI~ TINNED COPP~ ~ONDUCTO~ F~O~ ~Ev. DAT~ ~RiPTiON ~ THE INSULATED ~OUNO ~A~ TO THE OOAX OOAX KIT ~IN~ VIA "Y" TYPE OAOHELO. S~AL ~ O. 5/8"~X10' ~OUND ~0~ OA~NELPED TO ~2 &OLID TrNNE~ COPPE~ INSTALLE~ ]N 8" PVC " UNIN~ULATEP ~. ~2 A~ SOLI~ CONTINUOUS TINNE~ ~OPP~ ~, s~ouN2 ~A~ ~I~E EXTE~]O~ ~OUNO ~IN~ TO DE PLAOEDt~'~~='" ' I 2'-0" AHA~ F,ON ALL FOUN,ATIONS. SEE ~t,~2~ 5GALE:2 I ANTENNANTs. I O~OUN= I NOSOALE: NTS.=ZTAIL 8. 5PEOIFIOATION,. T~, ~3~ I IxIW CO~ISHT OP "TH~ HTH OE~ISN ~ROUP, r-- -- "'- HORE THAN 2/~ OF THE ~OD LENGTH MUST BE ~o~ THE EXOLUSIVB U~E ~ THE TITLE OLIENT. DUPLICATION OR USE ~iTHOUT ~XPRES~ ~l~EN BELOA THE LOGAN FROST LINE. co~s~T up THE C~EATO~ IS STRIOTL~ ' E~UIPmZNT SEOTO~ ~(I) PE~ OOAX CABLE AELL COVES ~~ ~ ~ ii~~ i I. ANTENNA. (&GHEMATIO ~EP~ESENTATION, 5EL ~ A~GHITEGTU~AL D~AAIN~ FO~ ~OUNTIN~.) / I'-O" PV~ INSPECTION ~ ~ ~ 2'-o" 2. NA3T. ATTAGHE~ TO NE~ ~ ~ 3. ANTENNA JUNPER. 51TN INFO.NATION ~ 4. COAX ~OUN~ KIT. ~O NOT INSTALL ON TEST ~BL TEST ~LL ~ ~TEST ~ELL ~ETAIL OOAXIAL GABLE. ~ ~INISH O~A~E 8. 2 BARREL H~DRAULIOALL~ 30" "~ 2-2X. D'-O" ~=. ~ IO. ¢2 ~OLIO T[NNE~ COPPE~ 05/08/0q ~OADAELO CONOUCTO~ 8" ~INIMUM ~AOlUS. SHEET TITLE IO'-O" OONNEOTION ~ OON'NEOTION PANDUIT OATAL05 ~ OTAP ADDUNED FRODT LINE 2-4~. ~ ] ~ A I I ~ (TO ~ V~RI~I~) 12. TO NEXT ANTENNA. I ~O~OUN~INO ONE LINE ~IAO~AM 4 ~O~OUN~ ~OD ~ETAIL O IxIW ~OA~= N%~, ~4x~ 5OALE: NTB. Ilxlq 5OALE: NTB. 24xB¢ 5OALE: NTB. AC'GA ~ ~- D D/4" 6" I-I14" DIA ' ='= U h~AX ~ -- ~ ANTENNA GAB.E U DESIGNc --- GROUP5 ~EATHE~P~OOFIN~ KIT / AN~E~ ~2212I~ A R C H I T E C T U R E PTO ~ANEL ~GHE~UL~ E N G I N E E R I N G ~6 AH~ STRAN~ COPPER ~ROUN~ P.O. BOX 3 HIRE (~ROUN~E~ T~ ~R~UN~ ~AR) 2~O AMP MAIN 24 ~[~UIT 120/2~V ~ZLET~ NEW JERSEY 0~30 (~TAN~A~ AN~ ~UN~IN~ ~IT) I 2 TEL: 7 3 2.8 8 8.6 2 10 CONNECTION OF CABLE ~ROUND KIT 5PA~E 60 ~ 4 ~oo MO~O:LL PO~ER F~: 732.847.4334 TO ~PS ANTENNA GABLE RECEPTACLE I~ ~ 6 20 LI~NT Lou Mog~o, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STRUC~ ENGINEER -/ & &PACE NJ - # A113345 NJ - # GE 36209 EDRE AC UNIT AGC, A % ~J IO NY - ~ 028992-1 cTNY-' ~ 22375075384 2 I/2" DiA. = 2" _, _ 6" SPACE ii 12 SPAO~ PA - ~ 061412 ANTENNA i ~ /(5UPP~lEg BY LUOENU ANTENNA I ANI2~Ei,~ ~22[21~ (.,,ABLE ~,OUND (,IT I'J' /k PTC PANEL SCHEDULE 200 AMP MAIN 24 CIRCUIT 120/2.4OV 2 SPARE 60 IOO MODC, ELL PO.~ER D 4- RECEPTACLE IS S 6 20 LI®HT SPACE ii 12 ID 14 &PACE SPACE I"7 16 I~ 2C 21 22 2S 24 (STANDAR~ AND~,EA ~OUNDIN¢ ~-.I"F) I2S 24 C, ABLF TO PIPE C, ONNEOT'O~, MAIN ~J~OUIT ~A~ ~ATIN~ - 22,000 AIO / ~U~N~Y T~PE ~A~ NOTE: DO NOT INSTALL (.,,ABLE ~ROUND KIT AT A BEND ~~UN~N~ ~IT 60N~ENT ~F TME 6~mATO~ I~ ~T~ICTL~ ~OHI~I~D -~ I/re'% 6mAX CABLE I, ALL COAXIAL CABLES L~AV]N~ THE MINIMUM ~ENDIN~ ~A~IU~ '~ 60WMUNI~ATI~N 6A~INET ~HALL ~2 A~ ~6~ ~ ~TO MI~D I O~ E~UAL. ~B-~142 ¢~OUN~ BAR 20" X 4" X I/4"), ¢~O~1-4 (INGULATO~5), ~OI5-~ (5/¢" B~AO~ETS), AN~ ~Of=-I ("5/8"-II X I" 2-HOLE ¢~OUN~IN¢ LUG FO~ 5~OUN~IN¢ ~ MASTE~ ¢~OUND ~A~ TERMINAL. THOMA& ~ / I ~ O~ ~oUT~ ~ o O ~T~ ~4~11~ O~ ~UA~. o 0 ~ ~. H~D~AULIOALL% ~O~P~E55EP LONe ~ BA~EL 2-HOLE ~ROUNglN~ LU~ FOR THE MAIN ~OUN~IN~ ~O~N 60NDUGTOR gE&I&N TYPE: ~T~N THE ~ASTE~ ~ROUND ~A~ T~INAL AN~ THE ~AIN ~OUNDIN~ ~AIN ~OUNDIN~ DO~N GONDU6TOR. ~_, ~LEGT~O~E. THO~A~ ~ ~ETT~ ~4&~2~E GOLO~ATION o~ E~UAL. CONNECT ®ROUNDIN® LU® TO THE ®ROUND T~,M~ ~&~, O5/O~)/Oq BAR (T~PIOAL). ~HEET TITLE D/6" &TAINLE55 &TEEL DIAMETE~ LOOK I ~ ~ F ~. I I ~ HASHE~ (T%PIOAL). ~/~" H~X H~A~ ~TAINL~ ~%~b NUT r [ Ps ANTENNA ®~OUN~IN® DETAIL 5 II"4ASTE '. ®~OUN~ BA~,, TEI~,,Iv'INATION ~ETAIL 6. PRovIDE LOOKTITE THREA~ LOCKER RE~ TO '-- --,/-/ O P~EVENT THEFT. :~ Ilxl7 5GALE: NT5. 24xD6 $6ALE: NTS. Ilxl7 5GALE: NTS, J 24x~ NT&. I