The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2579 '~'~COUNTY OF' sUF'F'OL.K~I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LEE E. KOPPE~LMAH Board of Appeals- Town' of Southold January 24, 1980 Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, ~he following applications which have been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commlssion are considered to be a matter for local determination.. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval. ~pplicant Municipal File Number Emanuel M. Kontokosta 2579 GGN:Jk Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning CH:llt= PLANNER TOWN CLERK 765-3783 Building Dept. Board of Appeals 18 0 9 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Pursuant to the General Municipal Law, Chapter 24, of the Consolidated Laws, Article 12-B, Sections 239-1 and m, the .~.O..a.~.~..0..~. ?.1~.~.e.~.~.8. ................. of the town of .... .S.O.~'~. ~.°.~.~. ................ (agency involved) hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (check one) ................ New and recodified zoning ordinance ................ Amendment to the zoning ordinance ................ Zoning changes Mr. Emanuel M. Kontokosta 26 Court Street Srooklyn, NY 11201 Appeal No. 2579 ..... ~ .....Special permits Speci&l Sxoeption, Art. V, Seotion 100-50B ................ Variances Location of affected land: W/.~.. ,,~..j~¢[ ..~r.~l_~ ~,.. ~, ~,~... ~r.~.o~:), .................................................... within 500 feet of: (check one or more) Part of 1000-38-007-004 ..... .x..x. ..... Town or village boundary line, or shore line ................ State or county road, parkway or expressway ................ State or county park or recreation area ................ Stream or drainage channel owned by the county or for which the county has established channe~ lines. ................ State or county owned parcel on which a public building is situated Commen~:A[~plicant WaS granted permission for 28-unit apartment compiex with 21 motel units and accessory coffee shop subject to the conditions annexed hereto. Also enclosed are copies of documentation on file. Secretary Date received by Suffolk County Planning Commission .................................................................................... File No ................................. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS; aetirlg Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, k. I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 December 28, 1979 Mr. Gerald G. Newman, Chief Planner Suffolk County Dept. of Planning H. Lee Dennison Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: Appeal No. 2579 - Emanuel M. Kontokosta Location of Property: W/s Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mr. Newman: I have received a copy of your Commission's letter %o the Southold Town Planning Board dated December 6th, and want to be sure that my understanding of your Commission's requirements coincide. It is my understanding that your Commission will not review and consider the special excep- tion application to the Board of Appeals un~il after the Board of Appeals has made its final determination and sub- mits same to you. If this is not so, please advise. Enclosed are copies of the following: (a) Environ- mental Assessment in the Long Form completed by the appli- cant, (b) original Determination of Significance of this Board, (c) recently reversed Determination of Non- Significance and letters from the NYS DEC and Suffolk County Department of Health Services giving their positions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours, Mrs. L.F. Kowalski Enclosures Secretary - · Southold Town Board of Appeals SmUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (616) 766-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN,JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASSt Actinq Chairman NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT TYPE I ACTION NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Section 617.10 of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Code of the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Board of Appeals has determined that the following project is classified as a Type I action and will not have a signi- ficant effect on the ~vironment. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT A_?peal No. 2579. Application of EMANUEL M. KONTOKOSTA, BY Richard F. Lark, Esq., Box 973, Cutchogue, NY 11935. Location of Project: W/s Shipyard Lane, East Marion. County Tax Map Item No. 1000-38-7-part of Lot 4. Permission Request~: To construct a 28-unit apartment com- plex with 21 motel units with coffee shop as an accessory use in M-1 Zone. Reason for Reverse Decision of this Board: Applicant has sub- mitted revised plans relocating cesspools and providing for handling surface drainage and regrading to minimize runoff into adjacent waters. Documents on File: Appeal Application, Notice and Affidavit of Mailing to Adjoining Property Owners, surveys and/or plans of the proposed project, Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspectoz, Legal Notice of Hearing, Environmental Assessment in the Short Form, Section of the County Tax Map showing the subject property, and other documents as may be deemed required. Person to Contact for More Information: Mrs. Linda Kowalski, Secretary, Board of Appeals, Southold Town Hall, Main Road, South- old, New York 11971; tel. (516) 765-1809. Dated: December 28, 1979. Copies sent to: NYS DEC regional and local offices, County Dept. of Health Services, County Planning Commission, Southold Town Supervisor James Homan, Richard F. Lark, Esq. as agent for the applicant, and Mr. Emanuel M. Kontokosta, applicant. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVXROb]~LESTTAL ASSESSMENT - PART .PROJECT I N-F OP~V~T ION (PL-:ASE COHPL ~ET~ CAC.~ ~U£STiO:( * -'-edica:e..4.A. if hOC ao~lioble) (;hvsi~l setting OF overall P~j~. both develoc~ ~nd ~ed~velco~ ar~as) I. .a~san: land usa: :Jrba~ , . .. Agriculture. ____. 3- l'ot~l acr~ege of ~j~t AAp~ximate at,age: ?~sancly After Co,let!on 7/L178 Yeadcw Or ~rushland , Carrmer'ciel , Suburban . ., a. Are c~er! be¢~ck :utc?o=pings :n ~rojec: site? 3. ~hat is :aotn :3 :e~rcc~? , /~'/~ . ..(In "~.e C) 7. 8. 9. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Approximate percentase of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10~ greater ~ Is project contiguous ~, ar contain a building or site listed on the ~(atiJnal Register of' Historic Places· ~ Yes ' ~,~ ' - "' What is the depth to the water table? ,~est ~ hunting or fishing appo~unities presently exist in the p~oject area? ~ ,~es ~o ~es project site cont~tn~y species of plant or animal life that ts identified as threatenedm o~ endangered - .,,Tee ~Tlo, ~¢ca~ing to - Identify each species '~ (quo or un. ual land fo~s on the p~ject sit~? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological Are ~here ~ny ~ fo~atians - ~es ~ No. (Oescribe _ ~- , Is ~e p~ject site ~sently us~ by the co.unity a~a- ~ Yes ~ No. ~the preset site offer Or include scenic views or vis~s kno~ tO be impotent tO .~e c~untty? ,, . ~es ~Ho ' Streams withto or contiguous to p~ject area: a. Na~ of stream and name oF river ~ which it is tributary ,~ .:-, Lakes; Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project ~hat is the dominant lanJ use end zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. ~. story}. . PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in di~,ensionTS appropriate) .. a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor /'Y'a~'/g acres. b. Project acreage developed: ///~,. acres initially; /~, acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to re~ein undeveloped '7.7 ,- . d. Length of project, in miles: /V~/~ (if appr~pKiate) If pro'eot is .an eXpanSion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building'square foot-. e. age ~/,,,4 , developed acreage ~y/~ · f. Humor of off- tr~et perking spaces existing ffo/Y~ ; proposed .~. · · ~/ . g. ,qext~ veh'iculer trips generated per hour. ~ (upon completion of pro eot) h. If residential: Ntu~ber and type of housing units: .. One'Family Two F~ily Multiple Family Initial ~ - Ultimate -- " If: Orientation Neighborhood-Ct ty-Regional Estimated Employment Co~ercial ~~ - ~ ~.~,e ~ ~.,.'~'/, Industrial J. Total height of tallest proposed str~ucture _ Condominium 2.' '~o~ much natural mat~ria e. 9. 10. ll. rock, earth, etc.)will be remove~m the site- ~'~ tons ~ -, cubic yards. How many acres of vegetation (trees, sh~bs, ~'r~und covers) will be removed from site - ~_~..acres. Will any mature ~rest ~aver lO0 years old) or other locally-impotent vegetation be removed by this project? ~ Yes ~o /y . Are there any plans ~r re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? _ es .~o If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction [~ months, (including demolition). If multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases antioipated~Y~ No. "' b. Anticipated date of co~encement phase 1 ~.month ~ year (including demol i ti on) c. Approximate oo~pletion date final phase__ ~ _?ntb '"" year. - .. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? i,.~ ,Yes Will blasting occur during construction? ~..Yes · Number of Jobs generated: during cons(roe(ion /A~...$ after project is complete .Yes . If yes, explain: Nu~er of jobs eliminated by this project Will project require relocation of a~y projects or facilities? a. Is surface or subsurf, ace liquid waste disposal involved? b. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) O. If surface disposal name of strea~ into ~hich effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, p~q~ds, stre~s, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? ~_Yes ~No. .. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the lO0 year flood plain? _ es ~"'~...~Ho 15. a. Does project inwlve disposal of Solid waste? ~ yes b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? ---~:'f_es c. If yes, give name: _ '~ ...; location , ~ d. ~ill any wastes not ~o into e se~a~e dtstcsal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~ Yes 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~.~es ~No 17. Will project routinely produce odors (~ro than one hour per day)? --" Yes 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? ~-"'Yes . . 19. Will project ~esul~ in an increase in eneredF use? _~Yes ----.~o. If yes, indicate type(s) If water supply is from wells indicate pumping capacity ~/~ gals/minute. Total .n~lc~pet_d water usage per day .d~o gals/day. Zoning: a. What Is dc=inant'zoning classification of site? b. Current specific zoning classification of site _ c.. Is proposed use consistent with p. resent zoning? d. If no, indicate desired eot, lng 20. Z1. -3- 26. Approvals: Is any Federal pernit required? ~ Yes ~ Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Lo~al and Regional approvals: Yes Approval Required Submittal Approval (~es, rio) (.Type) (Date) (Oate) City, Town, Village Board City. Town, Village Planning 5oard City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Oepar~ent Other local agencies Other regional agencies :~' State Agencies ~ Federal Agencies C. INFOP~'~TIorLAL O£TAILS Attach any additional infarm~tion as ~y be needed to clarify yauJ' project. If ~:here are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the'proposal, please discus~acts and the measures ~vhich can be taken to mitigate or avoid th~ _~~ .-- PREPARER'S SIG~{ATUR~~'e~'~ xc:~ ~-- .... ' · ~ Construction in a designated floodway. /~,#~Other impacts: ~ ~ ~E$ FOUN~ Oil THE $I¥~7 t~ns, etc.) Specific land ?onns: IjlPAC? O~WATE~. ~0/ YES 3. WILL PROJEC~ AFFEC¥ A~,Y ~A~R BODY ~ESI~(ATED AS .......... (~ C PROTECTED? {Under Articles 15. ~¢, ~5 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.) ExampmleS.. that Would Apply to Col~ 2 · gredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from ~ channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impect~: BODY _Examples. that Would Apply to Column ~ A lO~ increase or decrease in the surface area of any body "" of water or ~re than a lO acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds lO acres of -' surface area. .- Other impacts: g. WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROU)IO~ATER Exa~le_sthatWould Apply to Colun~l Project will require a discharge permit. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to ser~e proposed project. Project requires water suoply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or ooeration causing any contamination of a public water supply system. Project will adversely 'affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or h4ve inadequate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Project will likely cause siltation or other disch~e "into an existing body of water to the extent that there ~ll hP an obvious visual contrast to natural c~nditions. )DEP~ATE 'POTE:iTIA[ LARGE I~?~CT REDUc~ BY TOWlq OF SOUTHOLD ~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASsEsSMENT - PAI{T PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR ~AGNI~UDE General Information (Read Carefully) - In co.plating the form th~ reviewer should be guided ~y the question: Have my decisions and deracinations been reasonable.? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. Identifying that an effect wilt be potentially larva fcolumn Z) does not mean that it is also necessarily sionificant. Any large effect must be evaluated in ?iRT 3 to determine s~gnificance. ~y.identifying an ~fect in ~olumn 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. '' -- - ~ .... . · ~ h. ~h~wina tvo~s o~ effects and wherever possible the threshold The Examnles provlueo are :o assist cna r.v)ewe, .y .... ~ .~- o State and for most situations. ~ut, fur any sneciFic ~ro~ec~ or s~C ~ P ~y be ..'~re appropr(ate for a Potential ~arge Impact racing. ~ach project, on each site, in aaoh~ocalit¥, ~tll vary. llmrefore, the examples have been offered as They do not constitute an exhaustive list o~ impacts and thresholds to ~qs~er each question. t,,- importance of each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate INSTtUCTION$ (Read Carefully} a. Answe~ each of the 18 questions in PA~T ~. Answer Ye~tf there will be any effect, b. ~aTbe answers should be considered as Ye~ answers. If answering Yes tu a euestion then check the a~roariate box {columa 1 or Z) to indicate the potential · : end any example provided, check column ~. If size of the imoect. If impact threshol~ equals ~r .xc~ s impact will ockur but threshold is l~zer than example, check col~n I. 4. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact ~Q%.consider the i~qm. act as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large t~pact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to) a less.t~an large ~gnitude, place a Yes in colu~ 3. A Ho response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. · t. Z. ~MPACT ON LANO NO YES WILL T14, ERE BE ~ EFF£CTA$ A RESULT OF A PHYSIC% CFA:~GE TO PROJECT SITE? _Exa:l. es. that Would Apply tm Column O® Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in tbe project a~a exceed Construction on land where the depth to the water table is lass than 3 feet. Construction of oared parking area for l,~O0 or ~ vehicles. C~nstruction on land where bedrock is ex~osed or ~a~arally within 3 feat of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve ~re than One phase or stage· Excavation for mining 2urposes that would re~ve roFe than l,O00 tons of natural raaterial {i.e. rock or soil) ~er year. /)//~0construction of any new sanitary landfill. S~ALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE 40D£RATE LARG~ REDUC[D BY IMPACT [NPACT PROJECT C,HANGE -5- Other Impacts: WILL P~JECT ALTER DP. AINAGE FLO$1, PATTE2,9$ OR SURF,~CE t'.ATER~ES Examol9. that )Could Apply to Column 2 Project would impede flood water Flows. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. project is incompatible with existing drainage patt~-r,'.s. Other impacts: _ IMPACT ON AIR _,- . ~,Y E S WiLL PRO ECT O.AL "? ..... ;.:..-: .............. C E_xamples that Would Apply to Colun~ 2 Project will induce 1,gO0 or more- vehicle trips in any given hour. Project will result in the incineration cfm are than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than IO million BTU's per hour. Other impacts: _ IMPACT O~ PLANTS .AND WILL PROJECT AFFECT ~(Y THREATEI;ED OR e!OANGEA~ SPECIES? £xammles that Would Apply to Colc~nn Z Reduction of one or,more species listed on the ~:ewYork or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild- ' life habitat. . Application of Pesticide or he~fcide over r-O.'~ than b~ice a year other t~an for agriu~)tural purocsas. Other impacts; ,,,i, ~.,~ECT .U~S, ,, ALL AFFECT ,. :ND.,,~:,..D SPECIES? ...................... Examoi? that ~lould ~pply to Column 2 Project would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. Prnject recuires the ten. vol of more than 10 acres of mature Forest (~ver IOQ years in age) or other l:cally ' .mm~MpL TO POTF',xFrIAL ~Afl [IIPACT RATE lARGE REDUCED BY ACT I~PACT PRO,) ECT CHAFlGE mmm ), I~PAOT O~I,,~,~SUAL RESGURCE__ WILL THE PPOJECT AFFECT VIEWS, VISTAS ~R T4E VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE MEIGHBQRFOOD QR CO~!~4U~IITY? .............. Examoles that Uould Apply to Column 2 An incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction of new materials, colors and/or form~ in contrast to the surreunding landscape. A project easily visible, no~ easily screened, that is obviously different from others around it. Project will result in the elimination or majo~ screening of scenic views or vistas kno~.;n to be important to the area. Other impacts: _ -- ll. INPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCE~S WILL PROJECT [lqPAcT ANY SIrE OR STRUC~JRE OF HISTORIC, NO/YES pRE-HISTORIC OR PALEOMTOGICAL I~PORTANCE? ................. ~ 0 Examples that Would Apply to Columm 2 Project occurin~ wholly or parttall~ within or contiguous to any facility or site listed on the Mational Register of. historic places. A~y impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: __ OR FUTURE OPE~I SPACES OR RECRF_AFIOdAL OPPQP,~U.(I~ .- Examoles that Would Apply to Colunm 2 The per~nent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduce, ion of an open space important to the community. Other impact~: _ "' IMP~C'C A~l T~ANSPORTATiQ~ 13. WILL ~HERE BE A~I EFFECT TO EXISTING ?2ANSPORTATiQN SYSTB~S? ............................................... E_xa~ples. that Would Apply to Column 2 Alteration of present patterns of ~vemen~ of people " and/or good~. Project will result in severe traffic problems. ;HALL TO '~OEPATE I~PACT POTE~ITIA'L LARGE l~<PACT CA,, I~.,PA~T .~E REDUCED ~Y PROJECT Cl}.q NOE roLL TO POTENT[AL CA;~ t~DERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT 'J [!IPACT PROJ-~CT CHA,'.ISE $ ) IMPACT ON EHERG~ 14. WILL PROJECT AFFECT T~E CO~.~,IUNITIES SOURCES OF ~JEL E~ERG¥'SUPPLY? ........................................... ~xamnle~ that '~ould Apply tO Column 2 Project causing greater than $% increase in any form. of energy used in municipali:y. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supmly system to serve m~re than 50 single or ~o family residences. Other impacts; IMPACT ON NOIS~ WILL ~:R: BE OBJECTIO(ABLE O00RS, )~ISE, GLARE, VZ?JTION );O~Y~S Exameles that l(ould Apnly to Column 2 Blasting within 1.~O0 feet o~ a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely ~more than one hour per day). Project will produce operating noise exceedin~ t~e ' local ambient noise levels for noise outside of strictures. project will remove natural barriers that would act as a · Other impacts: IMPACq'. 0)! HEA~q & HAZarDS NO/YE 16. WILL PROJECT AF~C'F PUBLIC ,F-ALT~d A,D SAFETY? ............. ~'~ C Exemmles that Would Apply to Column 2 Projec: will cause · risk of explosion or release of hazardous "substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident ar upset conditions, or ~ere will be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Project that will r~sult in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., includin~ wastes that are solid, s~i-solid, liquid or contain loses.) Storaee facilities for one million or more gallons :f liquified " nacural gas or other liquids. Other impacts: ,, P.C, I;;PACT PROJECT F ~.r), ,, ,U,i~ ~ Y OR tlE~rJ~!.q~fl,? . .~ '.~' 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT TNE CHARACTER df THE EXISTIrI~ ~JO YES CO~.~tgNI ~? ........................................... ~xam91e, that Would Apg'ly to Co1~n 2 The population oF the C~ty, Town ar Village tn which the - project is located ~s likel~ to grow by ~re then 5~ of residea: human ~e ~unicipel budge:s for topi:al expenditures or opera ......... :~ng ~ervices will ~ncre~se b% more :h~n ~: per veer ~s a resul: of this p~ject. Will involve any oe~anent facility of a non-agricultural ~ use in an agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands f~m cultivation. ~e p~ject will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ~ .... "tinctures or ~reas of historic imprudence to the c~uaity. ~velopment will induce an in~ux of a pa~icular age '- "' ~ g~up with special needs. P~ject will set an impo~nt precedent for future p~jects. - .... "" P~Je~ will relocate 15 or more employees in one or ~re ....... businesses. Other im~cts: ~ '""~ .... 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING ~E PROJECT? ..... Ex~oles that Woul~ Apply to Colu~ 2 Either ~overnment or citizens of adjacent co,unities ....... ' ' have expressed opposition or r~ected the p~ject or have not been ~ntacted. ' ~ J ~TE~iTtAL LAKGE I~PACT OR IF YOU C~,;;~OT D~TE~4I~I~ J O~TE.~HI N'AT ION ..... Upon review of the information recorded on this FAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: The pro?ct will resul~ in no major impacts and, there.~ere, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment. e,,.c~ on the 8. Although the project Could have a significant '='=" environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation y~asures described in PART 3 have been included as part of the proposed ~?~: ' C. The project will result in one or more major adverse !moacts ,hat cannot be r~du~d and may cause significant damaae the envir nm, eot., '-I""'" "? PREPARE A )',EGATIIIE DECLRRATIO.~t PREPARE A ,NEC~AT!YE DECLJ~RATIOI; PREPARE POSITIVE OECLA.:LATiO[( PROCEED ~ITi ~ignatur~of Responsible Official in L~ ~O~}~J G~I~..~I$ Agency ~ Prin: or .ype name of respo~[lble offici Lead Agency TOWN OF SOUTHOLD EN~'IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS, Part 3 is prepared if one er more impact or effect is c:nsidered to be potentially large. The amount of writing necessa~! to answer Part 3 completing the instructions below have I placed in tnls record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? INST2UCTIONS Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in 'Column 2 of Part 1. Briefly describe the impJct. Oescr)be {if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than iarge impact by a pro- ject change. 8aced on the information availablej decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is tmoortant to the minicipality (city, town ar village) in .hic~ the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: - The probability of the impact or effec~ occurring - The duration of thj impact or effect - Its irreversibility, including permanently loss resources or val~es - ~hether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the impact or effect - Its potential divergence from local needs end goals - Whether known objections to the project apoly to this impact or effect. is determined to both lar:.e and its (their) consequence, based on the review DETEi,~Ii.~T.rO~'( OF SIGZIIFICA)ICE An action is considered to be significant if: One {or mare) immact above, is imoortant. PART III ~ATrJ~E:ITS (Continue on Attac)!ments. as needed) RICHARD F'. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK T193,~ December 17, 1979 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Linda F. Kowalski, Secretary RE: Appeal No. 2579 - Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Mrs. Kowalski: Pursuant to your recent request I am enclosing the following in connection with the above captioned matter: 1. Environment Assessment Form completed by Emanuel M. Kontokosta e Revised map dated October 24, 1979 conforming to the Suffolk County Department of Health and Department of Environmental Conservation requirements. As of this date I have not received any decision from the Town of Southold Planning Board regarding the subdivision re- quested in your letter of July 25, 1979. As a matter of pro- cedure it might be best for you to check directly with them as to the status of this matter. It is my understanding this application will be on the January 17, 1980 agenda. If you require any additional information, do not hesitate to contact me. Very. truly yours, Richard F. Lark RFL/mld Enclosures OF HEARINGS Pursuant to Section 267 of Town Law and the Provisions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinaece of the Town of Seathold, Ne~ York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Main Road, South- old, Now York on Thursday, January 17, 19~0 on the follow- lng appeals: 7:30 P.M. Application of ROBERT F. LAHSON, 72A Nassau Point Road, Cut- chogue, New York (John M. Czygier, Jr., Esq.) for Var- lances to the Zoning Ordin- ance: (a) Article III, Section 100-30(2)(c) for permission to keep pony & horse for personal use with less than 40,000 square feet devoted to such use on the subject premises, and (b) Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to con- struct accessory stable in frontyard area. Location of property: Nassau Point Road and Bridge Lane, Cutchogue; Nassau Point Map No. 156A, Lots 130 and 129; bounded north by Hillmer, west by Bridge Lane, south by Nassau Point Road, west by Roche. 7:40 P.M. Ap0lication of Ob OJ¢~S og-ADdmoJd pursuant to New York Town Law Section 2~0-A. Location of property: Miami Avenue and Sound',flew Avenue (private street), Peconic; bounded north by Mathal Realty Corp., Inc., southeast by Miami Ave- nue, southwest by Soundview Avenue (private street), and northwust by Booth. County Tax Map No. 1000-67-6-16. 'fA, q~¥ m~.-a t~ T~rl~ ~.'sq.} 26 Court Street, Brook- lyn, New York, for a Special Exception to me Zoning Ord- inance, Article V, Section 100- 50B(3), (4) and C(2), for per- mission to erect 28-unit apart- merit complex with 21 motel units and coffee shop. Loca- tion of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion; bounded north by Parkside Heights Co., east by Shipyard Lane, south by Gardiners Bay, west by Parkside Heights Co. Dated: December 31, 1979. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS 1TJ3-3361 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, 1 STATE OF NEW YORK, ? ss: JO~U i~ST ........... ;~. ~ ........................ being duly Sworn, says that ........ is Printer and Publisher of th~ SUFFOLK WEEKLY TIMES, a news~per publish~ ~ ~nport; in ~d county: and ~at the noti~, ot which ~e ~e~ is ~ print~ ~py, ~s ~en published in the ~d Suf~lk W~k~ T~es ~nce in eoch w~k, ~r ........................... w~ks third suc~ssiv~Iy ~mmencing on ~e .......................... gar~uary ..... 19.~. ,, ....... ............ Swan t~fore me thqs .. ~ ....... ~Y ~.5; .Stat. of ~ Y~ 3±¥(] LEGAL NOTICE OF ~ ': ~c~t.to S~'~(~ 267 ot ~old, ~ Y~k, public ~ ~! ~ held by the Zoning Board of Appeels, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NeW York, on ~u~y, J~u~ 17, 1~, ~ ~e follo~ng appeals. 7:~ P.M. Applica~on of ROBERT F. LARSON, 72A N~ssan Point R~, Cutch- ~e, New York (John M. Cz~er, Jr., ~q.) for V~- ~s to ~e ~ning ~n- ~: (a) A~cle IH, ~on 1~-30 (2) (c) for ~issi~ m keep pony ~ horse for ~ use wi~ less than ~,~ squ~e ~t ~v~ed to such use on the subject p~mises, end (b) ~cle HI, ~on 1~-32 for ~ission Soundview Avenue (private street), Peconic; bounded no~h by Ms. al Real~ Co~., Inc., southeast by Miami Avenue, southwest by Sound- ~ew Avenue (p~vate s~eet), and northwest by Bootb. Coun~ T~ Map No. 1~-67- 6-16. ~NI~EL M- KONTOKOS- 26 Cou~t Strcet~ Brooklyn. Ne~w Yl~rk, for s Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section. I00-50B(3), (4) and C(2), for permission to erect 28-unit apartment complex witb 21 motel units and coffee shop. Location of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion; bounded north by Parkside Heights Co., east by Shipyard Lane, south hy Gardiners Bay, west by Parkside Heights Co. Dated: December 31, 1979 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS IT, 1/3/80 (1079) COUNTY O~ SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK Potricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Edilcr, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at $outhold, in Suffolk County; 2nd that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, i~os been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watch- man once each week for ............ / .......................... weeks ~uccessively, commencing on the .....?.. ................................ Sworn to before me this ...................... do¥ oz [ BI t y Public A~J~OJNETTE BERKOSKI Expires i~,iarch 30, LEGAL NOTICE OF HEARINGS Pursuant to Section 267 of Town Law and the Provisions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on Thursday, Janu- ary 17, 1980 on the following appeals: 7:30 P.M. Application of ROBERT F. LARSON, 72A Nassau Point, Road, Cutchogue, New York (John M~ Czgier, Jr., Esq.) for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance: (a) Article III, Section 100-30(2) (c) for permission to keep pony & horse for personal use with less than 40,000 square feet devoted to such use on the subject premises, and (b) Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct accessory stable in frontyard area. Location of property: Nassau Point Road and Bridge Lane, Cutchogue; Nassau Point Map No. 156A, Lots 130 and 129; bounded north by Hi]lmer, west by Bridge Lane, south by Nassau Point Road, west by Roche. 7:40 P.M. Application of SOL BERG, 3810 Pine Neck Road, Southold, New York (John Bertani Builder Inc., agent) for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct accessory structure in frontyard area. Location of property: 3810 Pine Neck Road, Southold; bounded north by Pollert, Gibbons, Hamilton, Conroy, Pulitzer and Jockey Creek, west by Marchese, south by Pine Neck Road, east by Jockey Creek. County Tax Map No. 1000-70-6-33. 7:50 P.M. Application of ROBERT WADDINGTON, JR., Tuthill's Lane, Aquebogue, New York, (Richard F. Lark, Esq.) for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to construct dwelling with insufficient frontyard setback, and for approval of access pursuant to New York To~n Law Section 280-A. Location of property: Miami Avenue and Soundview Avenue (private Street), Peconic; bounded north Legal Notice of Hearings -2- January 17, 1980 by Mathal Realty Corp., Inc., southeast by Miami Avenue, southwest by Soundview Avenue (private street), and northwest by Booth. County Tax Map No. 1000-67-6-16. ,8:05 P.M. Application of EMANUEL M. KONTOKOSTAf {by Richar~_F. Lark, Esq.) 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York~ for a Specia Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 100-50B(3), (4) and C(2), for permission to erect 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and coffee shop. Loca- tion of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion; bounded north by Parkside Heights Co., east by Shipyard Lane, south by Gardiners Bay, west by Parkside Heights Co. Dated: December 31, 1979. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Instructions to newspaper(s): Please publish once, commencing the week of January 1, 1980 and forward four (4) affidavits of publication to: Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, before January 7, 1980. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING December 6, 1979 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Map of Minor Subdivision - E. M. Kontokosta West side of Shipyard Lane 2,458.97 feet south of Main Road, East Marion, New York. Dear Mr. Raynor: The Suffolk County Planning Com~s~ionj~ts regular meeting on December 5, 1979, reviewed the pr~osed subdiviszon Rla~entitled, "Minor Subdivision - E. M. Kontokosta", referred to it pursuant ~0 Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following 5 conditions deemed necessary to help preserve the natural and aesthetic attributes of Gardiner's Bay: 1. No residential structure shall be located within 100 feet of the mean high water line. 2. No sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or installed within 100 feet of the mean high water line. 3. A conservation buffer or easement having a minimum width of at least 50 feet shall be established along the shoreline. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision and any of the lots shall be discharged directly into Gardiner's Bay. 5. No lot shall be subdivided in the future without the approval of the Planning Board. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman 2 December 6, 1979 The conditional approval granted to this subdivision applie~ only to the creation of the subdivision and should not be construed as an endorsement of any proposed multiple use requiring the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any application made to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a special exception or vari- ance to permit the proposed multiple use will be subject So separate review and consideration by the Co~mission. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section File: S-SD-79-16 CGL:jk Encl.: Map Suffolk County 9epartment of Planning Lee Dennison E:~eutive Office Building Veterans l~morial i'Ii~hway HauppauEe, ~T~w York 11707 ~7~-a2~'lf Town of Southold Board of Appeals December 4, 1979 C~ntleman: petitiener~ Emanuel M. Kontokosta File ?,~o. ' 2579 Please be advised t/lat pursuant to Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter~ the above captioned a?plication will mot be reviews~ because of noncompliance with requirer~nts for notice an~ naps a~ stipulated in Informational Bulletin ~o. g of the Suffolk Coonty PlanninF Commission. following informationwill only be accepte~ upon submission throu?h the of- fices of the municipal referrin~ a~e~cy' Please submit the following: (1) a complete copy of the application including the site plan; (2) information demonstrating compliance with density criteria in the zoning ordinance; (3) the minutes of the public hearing; (4)~conditional findings of the Zoning Board of Appeals; and (5) requirements of the N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation including a copy of any environmental impact statement. Note: Information requested by the Suffolk County Planning Comm4ssion relative to S-SD-79-16 pertains solely to subdivision review pur- suant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. Very truly yours Lee .. Xoppelnan Director of Plannin~ Chief Planner COMMISSION Seth A. Hubbard Chairman Lee E. Koppclman D~'ector of Planning Suffolk County Department Planning Veterans Memorial Highway JOHN V,N. KLEIN, County Executive Haupp~uge, L. L, N. Y. :R'2~:-:~ll~: 979-2918 November 8, 1979 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - E. M. Kontokosta W/s Shipyard Lane 2,453±' s/of Main Road, East Marion, N.Y. Dear Mr. Raynor: It was the consensus of the members of the Comission that the referral of the proposed subdivision is premature and incomplete. The Commission feels that it will be difficult to evaluate the impact of this proposal on the adjacent body of water, Gardiner's Bay, on the basis of the informa- tion provided. Of particular concern is the general, low lying nature of the tract, the proposed plans to develop Lots 1 and 2, and whether the development will be a condominium. It is suggested that information be provided on these aspects of the subdivision. In ~addition, information should be provided on the zoning aspects of this proposal; that is, does the zoning ordinance allow the type of development proposed. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section File: S-SD-79-16 CGL. er New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Affairs Unit Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 516-751-7900 Commissioner December 4, 1979 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Street Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Linda Kowalski, Secretary Application by Emanuel Kontokosta, 28 unit apartment complex and 21 unit motel development at Shipyard Lane, Sonthold, New York TW 15278-0143, SPDES NY 0177059 Dear Ms. Kowalski: Recently I advised you of this Department's position and involvement per- taining to the above project. As indicated in my 11/19 letter we were anticipating the receipt of re- vised plans which were to mitigate the concerns we had for the project. For this reason I requested that the Board defer their formal decision with regard to the significance of the action. The applicant has submitted revised plans relocating the cesspools and providing for handling surface drainage and regrading to minimize runoff enter- ing adjacent waters. The application for the State Tidal Wetlands permit now appears to be approvable as revised, providing, however, that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has no objections to the revised location and design of the dis- posal systems. We have reviewed your Positive Declaration dated 11/29/79 and note that the reasons given for significance were the same parameters we had concern for prior to seeking the revised plan. We have therefore advised the applicant to inform you of the modifications. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services is also being notified by copy of this letter (w/copy rev. plan). Southold Town Board of Appeals Attn: Linda Kowalski 2 December 4, 1979 Please advise this Department if your determination of significance is changed by this latest submittal. We will consider the Tidal Wetlands and State Pollutant Discharge Elimina- tion System (SPDES) permits incomplete until a Draft Environmental Impact State- ment or a Negative Declaration is received from your agency. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, David De Ridder Associate Env. Analyst DDR:ll cc: D. Middleton R. Jewell, SCDHS E. Kontokosta COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER December 3, 1979 Mr. Robert J. Douglass, Acting Chairman Town of Southold Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Appeal No. 2579 Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Mr. Douglass: In regards to the pending application, we have met with Mr. Kontokosta and reviewed the preliminary laj, out of his proposed complex. Water supply for the complex will be from the Village of Greenport water system so that an on-site water supply will not be necessary. The proposed sewage disposal system or systems will be septic tank-leaching pool systems and as such may require the placement of fill to raise the grade in the areas of the sewage disposal facilities. Mr. Kontokosta is aware that site grading plans will be required by this office as part of his submission to the Health Depart- ment for approval. We will also require either a copy of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation wetlands permit if necessary, or if not required, their comments as they pertain to this site. Please keep us informed of any action or decision on your part for our records. Very truly yours, Robert A. Villa, P.E. Chief General Engineering Services RAV:cah Long Island Oyster~l~ms. Inc. P.O. Box AD ~ Greenport. NY 119~~ Tel 516 477 0195 Island A Company of Inmont Aquafoods November 30, 1979 Chairmen Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Sir: It has come to our attention that Emanuel M. Kontokosta, 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York has applied for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 100-50 B(3) and (4) and C(2), for permission to erect a 28 unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and a coffee shop on Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York. Our concern is that the waste waters from this complex mey render our shellfish land uncertified for the shipment of shellstock. This shellfish land and the crops thereon are a vital part of our marketing program. The area has a long history of pure water necessary for merketln9 certification of our crops. Any influence on these waters that would negate the certification, for the sale of shellfish, by the New York State Conservation Department of this area would be extremely detrimental to our business. The shellfish land in question is directly adjacent to the pro- posed complex. Your consideration of our request to insure continued certification of these waters for the sale of shellfish is essential to us. Please feel free to contact us for further information. Very truly yours, LONG ISLAND OYSTER FARMS, Vice-President, Operations INC. JFM:mvn Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN,JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERTJ. DOUGLASS t actinq Chairman November 29, 1979 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PREPARE AN EIS and . DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Pursuant to Section 617.10 of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Act, notice is hereby given~that the proposed action may have a significant effect on the envir- onment and that'the applicant must prepare a'Draft Environmental Impact Statement. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (Appeal No. 2579) Applicant: Mr. Emanuel M. Kontokosta,c/o his attorney, Richard F. Lark, Esq., Main Road, Cutchogue 'New York 11935. Address of Project: Marion, Westerly side of Shipyard Lane, East Town of Southold~ County of Suffolk. Proposal of Applicant: To construct a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units with coffee shop as an accessory use in M-1 Zone. Reason for Its Possible Effect: (1) Locating of sewage systems and its affect to Gardiners Bay, · (2) Excessive drainage running off and entering the waters of Gardiners Bay Lead Agency & Address: Southold Town Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971, t~l. ~516-765-1809, Mrs. Linda Kowalski, Secretary. Copies To: Suffolk County Planning Commission, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, New York State'Department of Environmental Con- servation Commissioner in Albany & its regional office in Stony Brook, New York, Southold Town Supervisor James Homan, and Richard F. Lark, Esq. as agent for the applicant, Emanuel M. Konto~osta. SOUTHDLD, L. !., N.Y. TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONISo JR. SERGE DOYEN. JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERTJ. DOUGLASSt Acting Chairman November 29, 1979 Mr. David DeRidder N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY Building 40, Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 Re: Appeal No. 2579 - Emanuel M. Kon%okosta Your Ref. ~TW 15278-0143 Dear Sirs: This Department has received the subject application ~Or permission to construct a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units with a coffee shop as an accessory use at Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold, New York, part of County Tax Map Item #1000-38-007-04. Pursuant to Section 617.10 of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Act, notice is hereby given that the proposed action may have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, 'and that the applicant must prepare.a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Please let us know your comments and recommendations on this action if you have not already done so to be received by this Department not later than December 20, 1979. We shall interpret a lack of response to mean no objection by your agency. Sincerely yours, ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, Acting Chairman Enclosures By: Linda F. Kowalski, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. !., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONI$, JR. SERGE DOYEN,JR. TERRY TUTH I L L ROBERTJ. DOUGLASS~ Acting Chairman November 29, 1979 Mr. Robert Villa, P.E. Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services County Center Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Appeal No. 2579 - Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Sirs: This Department has received the subject application for permission to construct a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units with a coffee shop as an accessory use at Shipyard Lane, East'Marion, Town of Southold, New York, part of County Tax Map Item #1000-38-007-04. Pursuant to Section 617.10 of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Act, notice is hereby giVen that the proposed action may have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, 'and that the applicant must prepare.a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Please let us know your comments and recommendations on this action if you have not already done so to be received by this Department not later than December 20, 1979. We shall interpret a lack of response to mean no objection by your agency. Sincerely yours, ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, Acting Chairman Enclosures By: Linda F. Kowalski, Secretary Town R ard peals SOUTHDLD, L. I., N. Y. TE LEPHON E (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN. JR. TERRY TUTHJLL ROBERTJ. DOUGLASSt aotiTtg Chairman November 29, 1979 Mr. Gerald Newman SuffolkCounty Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: Appeal No. 2579 - Emanuel M. Kontokosta Your File S-SD-79-16 Dear Sirs: This Department has received the subject application ~or permission to construct a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units with a coffee shop as an accessory use at Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold, New York, part of County Tax Map Item #1000-38-007-04. Pursuant to Section 617.10 of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Act, notice is hereby, given that the proposed action may have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, 'and that the applicant must prepare-a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Please let us know your comments and recommendations on this action if you have not already done so to be received by this Department not later than December 20, 1979. We shall interpret a lack of response to mean no objection by your agency. Sincerely yours, ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, Acting Chairman Enclosures By: Linda 'F. Kowalski, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, I. I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTH ILL ROSERT J. DOUGLASS ~, Acting Chairman November 29, 1979 To: Southold Town Planning Board Re: Appeal No. 2579 - Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Sirs: This Department has received the subject application for permission to construct a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units with a coffee shop as an accessory use at Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold, New York, part of County Tax Map Item #1000-38-007-04. Pursuant to Section 617.10 of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Act, notice is hereby given that the proposed action may have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, 'and that the applicant must prepare.a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Please let us know your comments and recommendations on this action if you have not already done so to be received by this Department not later than December 20, 1979. We shall interpret a lack of response to mean no objection by your agency. Sincerely yours, ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, Acting Chairman Enclosures By: Linda F. Kowalski, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals S{3UTHEILD, L. I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CRARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN,JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERTJ. DOUGLASS r ~C~g Chairman November 29, 1979 Richard F. Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appeal No. 2579 Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Mr. Lark: Continuing on our letter dated November 19, 1979 in which the Board of Appeals requested that the applicant · ' file an Environmental Assessment in the Long Form, please be advised that the applicant is further required to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and to file same with this Department. Only until we are in receipt of these documents can the next step be taken. Thank you for your consideration and if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, Linda F. Kowalski Secretary P.S. As you probably know, SEQRA procedures are quite lengthy and expedience would'be to your benefit. Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHDLD, L. I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASSt Acting Chairman November 19, 1979 Richard F. Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appeal No. 2579 Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Mr. Lark: Please be advised that by a resolution of this Board November 15, 1979, the applicant will be required to complete and file an enviromental assessment in the long form for consideration, which is submitted with this letter. As you know, a resolution was adopted recessing this matter until the first meeting in January 1980. Sincerely yours, inda F. Kowalski Secretary Enclosure O TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SHORTrENVIRON~ENTAL ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS: (a) In order to answer that the preparer wiI1 use currentiy available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that additional studies, research or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be significant and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is not significant. (dj Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of land? ........................ ~/Yes No 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site? .......... J/Yes No 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on existing body of water? ....................... Y~s o 4. Will project have a potentially large impact , on groundwater quality? ....................... ~/Yes No 5. Will project significantly effect drainage ~e flow on adjacent sites? ........................ s No 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? ........... Yes o 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? ............................... Yes o 8. Will project have o major effect on visual character of the community or scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? Yes ~/~o 9. Will projec[ adversely impact any si[e or s¢ruc[ure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance or any site designated as o critical environmental oreo by 1 1 y? ......... Y 0 OCO age~c .......... ' ;- - ..- ..... 10. Will project hove o major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? ......... ~Yes ll. Will project resul[ in major traffic problems or cause o major effect ~o existing [ronsporto[ion systems? ....................... ~Yes 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors~ noise~ glore~ vibro[ion~ or electrical disturbance os o result of ¢he project's operation? .................................... Yes ~No 13. Will project have any impact on public health or safety? .................................... Yes No* 14. Will project affect ~he existing community by directly causing o growth in permonen[ population of more ¢hon 5 percent over o one year period or have a major negative effect on the character of the community or neighborhood? ................................. Yes 15. Is ~here public controversy concerning [he pro ect? ...................................... the questions in this short EAF it is assumed New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Affairs Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 516-751-7900 Commissioner November 19, 1979 Southold Town Board of Appeals F~ain Street Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Linda Kowalski, Secretary Dear Ms. Kowalski: Re: Application by Emanuel Kontokosta, 28 unit apartment complex and 21 unit motel development at Shipyard Lane, Southold, NY TW 15278-0143, SPDES NY 0177059 The purpose of this letter is to clarify this Department's position with regard to State Tidal Wetlands and State Environmental Quality Review (SEQRA) Act for the above project. This office has recently received updated plans from the applicant which has raised some concern about the project's possible effects on the adjacent littoral zone. The density of units proposed and the location of sanitary sewage systems create a potential for adverse impacts to Gardiners Bay. To mitigate or eliminate those impacts the applicant has been requested to resubmit plans relocating the sanitary systems further landward on the site and also prepare drainage plans to minimize the amount of runoff entering the waters of Gardiners Bay. We therefore request that you delay your formal decision with regard to the significance of the project until we have completed our review of the revised plans. Southold Town Board of Appeals Attn: Linda Kowalski, Secretary - 2 - November 19, 1979 Thank you for your cooperation. DDR:ll cc: D. Middleton R. Jewell, SCDHS R. HaJe E. Koutokosta Sincerely David De Ridder Associate Env. Analyst New York State Deparlment of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Aff~ rs Bldg. 40, SUNY - Rocml 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 Robert F. Flacke C0mmJssio~er November 13, 1979 Southold Town Board of l~n Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: TW 15278-0143, ~manuel M. FDntokosta Our z~ords indicate that you have been designated as the lead agency in t_he above referenced application to construct a multiple unit dwelling within the Town. Before we are able to formulate an opinion of this project, we must know: 1. The location and type of s~ptic syst~u proposed. 2. The method(s) of a~l~ng with surface runoff. e AS th~ project site is located within a flood plain, what will be the total amount and extent of fill incl, wt~ng final grade elevations, source of fill and first floor elevations of proposed structures o By copy of this letter we are requesting that the applicant supply us with this information. Permit Administrator cc: ~manuel M. Kontokosta Men~andum from.... BUILDING INSPF_,CrORS OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN HnLL, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 765-1802 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF RECESSED HEARINGS Please be advised that the Soutbeld Town Board of Ap- peals will be recessing the fol- lowing matters unlil Novem- ber 15, 1979 to be held at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at the following times: ~ 7:30 P.M. (E.S.T.)~.UP°n application of RA¥I~IOND AND ANN CIACIA, Main Road, Greenpert, New York (James Bitses, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance Article VIII, Section 100- $0 for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. 7:35 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of STEPHEN J. PERRICONE KENELOPE KOUSOUROS, 7470 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 1O0-60 for permission to estab- lish a disco bar with dancing. 7:50 (Richard F. Lark, Esq.) for a Special Exception to the Zon- ing Ordinance, Article V.. Sec- tion 100-50 for permission to erect a 25-unit apartment com- plex with 21 motel units and coffee shop. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, | STATE OF NEW YORK, ~ ss: J ........ ~o.~p..~.u.s.t..a.v.~ .on ............. being duly Sworn, says that ...she., is Printer and Publisher of the SUFFOLK WEEKLY TIMES, a newspaper published at Greenport, in said county; and t~hat the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the s~id Suffolk Weekb/ Times once in eoch week, ~or . . 9.n.e. ..................... weeks successively commencing on the .e~Leventl~ .............. day of .. ~).c..t??..e?. ......... m7.?.. ........ ~ .(.~..~..~. ~.-', ~..~..,~.~.~ ~ .......... Sworn to before me ~,,is . avof .... , L NANCY ~. DOU~LAS~ LEGAL NOTICE' NOTICE OF RECESSED HEARINGS Please be advised that the Southold Town Board of Ap- peals will be recessing the following matters until Nov- ember 15, 1979 to be held at the Southold Town Hall, Ma'm Road, Southold, New York, at the following times: 7:30 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of RAYMOND AND ANN CIACIA, Main Road, Greanport,. New York (James Bitses, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance Article VIII, Section 100-80 for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. 7:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of STEPHEN J. PERRICONE KENELOPE KOUSOUROS, 7470 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-60 for permission to estab- lish a disco bar with dancing. 7:50 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon~ a liCatlon o! ~MAI~U~I~ ~. ~TOKOSTA, 20 Cour~ a Special Exception to the Zon- ing Ordinance, Article V, Section 100.50 for permission to erect a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and coffee shop. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS 1T, 10/4/79 (1007) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK >TA, E OF NEW YORK Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, soys that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk Count/; and that the notice of whicl~ the bnnexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Tmveler-Wotch- man once each week for I weel~ successively, commencing on the ..... .~... .............................. Swor to before me this c ~ day Notary Publie ANTOII~[I'~ ~£RKOSKI NOTARY pt~L~, State of New York ~MrO~ ~n SuJtelk County No. 52-4~796 19~/ LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF RECESSED HEARINGS Please be advised that the Southold Town Board of Appeals will be recessing the following matters until November 15, 1979 to be held at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at the following times: 7:30 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of RAYMOND AND ANN CIACIA, Main Road, Greenport, New Ygrk (James Bitses, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article VIII, Section 100-80 for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. 7:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of STEPHEN J. PERRICONE KENELOPE KOUSOUROS, 7470 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-60 for permission to establish a disco bar with dancing. 7:50 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of EMANUEL M. KONTOKOSTA 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York (Richard F. Lark, Esq%) for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 100-50 for permission to erect a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and coffee shop. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Please publish once, OCTOBER 11, 1979and forward three (3) affidavits of publication to: Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 before October 11, 1979. HENRY E. R&YNOR. 4. ~ C~I.. FREDERICK E. GORDON ~AMESWALL Bennett Orlowski, Jr. P D T LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 September 7, 1979 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 Richard Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Lark: The following decisions were made regarding the properties formerly owned by the Dawn Estates and the Kaplans. It will be Mr. Kontokosta's responsibility to make application for a minor subdivision of the three southerly lots in the Multiple-Zoned property now in the names of Parkside It will be the responsibility of the Kaplans to make application for the subdivision in the residential area and make note that one of the lots has been transferred to Parkside Heights Company. They must also include the lO0 foot strip ia the Multiple zone. Yours truly, Copy to Emanuel Kontokosta HER/mt HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES August 21, 1979 DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Ms. Babette C. Conroy, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold, New York 11971 Re: Emanual Kontokosta Dear Ms. Conroy: Please be advised that your letter of July 27, 1979 addressed to Mr. Roy Haje,with a carbon copy to us, has been received and reviewed. It would appear that three permits will be required prior to the issuance of final approval for the proposal. It is expected that this site will be supplied with public water and that the groundwater ele- vation and soil conditions are conducive to an on site private sanitary system. Accordingly, the department, without actually seeing a formal submission from Mr. Kontokosta, does not wish to assume lead agency status at this time. Upon a review, additional comments may be made. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Robert W. Jewell, P.E. Assistant Public Health Engineer General Engineering Unit RWJ:rb NewYork State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Affairs Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 516-751-7900 Commissioner Robert F. Flacke August 20, 1979 Babette C. Conroy, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: TW 15278-0143, Emanual Kontokosta Dear Ms. Conroy: This is to confirm that this Department does not object to your agency's assuming lead agency status on the above-referenced subject. Very truly/y~purs, D~nie//J. Larkin, P.E. Regi~ngl Supervi~sor of Regl~ory Affairs DJL: 11 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ROBERT W. GI LLISPIE, JR., CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 August 20, 1979 Richard F. Lark, Esq. Main Road - P. O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Appeal No. 2579 - Emanuel Kontokoska Dear Mr. Lark: At the August 16, 1979 meeting of the Board of Appeals the abov~ captioned matter was recessed until Thursday, October 18, 1979, to enable you to obtain the following information: (1) (3) Subdivision approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Board of Health Approval. Department of Environmental Conservation - Environ- mental Impact Statement. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the office. bcc i°urs' Babette C. Conro~~ Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, I. I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ROBERT W. GILLISPIE, JR., CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN,JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS MEMORANDUM TO THE FILE RE: Eman Kontokoska Spoke to Daniel Larkin in Mr. Roy Haje's office who advised they have no objection to the Southold Town Board of Appeals taking lead agency status. Will send letter to confirm same. Spoke to Robert Jewell, Suffolk County Board of Health, stating they have no objection to Southold Town Board of Appeals taking lead agency status. Will send letter to confirm same. Dated: August 20, 1979 Babette C. C Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals 5OUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-'1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ROBERT W. GILLISPIE, JR., CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS July 27, 1979 Mr. Roy Haje Environmental Analysis Unit Building 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York ~1794 RE: TW-15278-0143 - Emanual Kontokosta Dear Mr. Haje: Emanual Kontokosta has made application to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to erect a 28 unit apartment complex with 21 motel units. In accordance with a letter addressed to you dated July 25, 1979, from the Town of Southold Planning Board, this will confirm that the Southold Town Board of Appeals will assume l~ad agency status for the Town. Relative to this application we are en- closing a photostatic copy of Mr. Kontokosta's application for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance. Also enclosed please find a completed short Environmental Assess- ment Form and a copy of the preliminary site plan submitted by Mr. Kontokosta for this project. This project is unlisted; other agencies may be involved, but the optional coordinated procedures for d~signation of lead agency and determining significance will not be followed. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until August 16, 1979. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency. Enclosures Yours truly, / Babette C. Conroy, Secretary Southold Town, Board of Appeals cc: Richard F. Lark, Esq. Commissioner, Robert F. Flacke Suffolk County Health Department Southold Town Building Department HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr. ~ chin, FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 july 25, 1979 'I'ELEPHONE 765- 1938 Mr. Roy L. Haje Re.g?latory Affairs Building 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: TW 15278-014~ Emanual Kontokosta Dear Mr. Haje: The Town of SoUthold desires lead agency status in the above matter. There are several steps which the applicant must take to proceed with this project. 1. Apply for and receive approval of a subdivision of the property. 2. Apply for and receive approval from the Board of Appeals for the proposed apartment complex. 3. Apply for and receive site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. This matter will not be acted upon until the above have been complied with. It would appear that the Board of Appeals would assume the lead agency status for the Town. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Muriel ~rl~hl Secretary New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Re~,l atory AffM rs Bldg. 40, SUN~ Stony Brook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 July 17, 1979 ~ F. Flacke Commissioner Ms. Muriel B~ush Town of Southold Pl~uning ~ Y~n Stree~ Southold, NY 11971 ~e: TW 15278-0143 ~an,~3 F~ntokosta On June 12, 1979 we forwar~_~ an inquiry letter regarding lead age~f status (copy enclosed). tele~ that the Town wanted lead agency status. May we please have confirmation of th/s and an indication of how the Town intends to act Alternat~ Local Tj~I~.I ~tlaxlds Peri, it A~a~nistrator Encl. Reg,,latory Affairs Bldg. 40, SUIiY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 51~-751-7900 P~hart F. ~lecke June 12, 1979 Ms. Muriel Brush Town of Southold Planning Board Main Street Southold, New York 11971 Pa: TW 15278-0143 E~nual Koncokogta Dear lis. Brush: Pursuant to a recent telephone conversation between lit. Paynor and }ir. David De Ridder of my office, I am enclosing a copy of our Tidal Wetlands Application, site plan, and FAF (short form). We understand the Town wtshes to be designated lead agency under SEQR and are notifying the applicant, Mr. Kontokosta, of this fact by copy of this letter. As we must consider our application incomplete until notified by you of your. decision concerning the si~lificanco of the project, please keep us formed of whatever action you ~y take on this project. Vet7 truly yo~rs~ Roy L. HaJe ' Alternate Local Tidal Wetlauds Permit Administrator RLH:ll cc: E. Kou~okosta Enc, INSTRUCTtOES~ tn) In order to ~nswer the q ~est. ionn ~n this short gAF ~s Is assumed ~hat the preparer will u$~ currently available Info~tion concerning the project and the i~e!y impacts of the action. It Js not e~pected, tMt additional rtudies~ research or other investigations will be uudertaken. (b) IA~ any question has been answered Yea the project ~y.be significant and a ' '~'~'M('c')'-If all questions have been answered No likely project*is ' '.-'.-, 1. W~i project resnlt lu a large physical c~nge -~'>' :.:, .. :~, to the project site or physically alter ~ore X - -. - than 10 acres of land? · · · . · · · · Yes No 2. Wilt t~ere be s major change to any unique or ~ unusual land form fo~d on th~ si~e? · , , · ... -Y~s . X : 3, 'W~i prcJect alter or have a large effec~ on X ..A. Will proJec~ b~ve a po%entiaily large lmpac~ on groundwater quali~y? .... · .... . 'les X --~- 5. W~ll project slEnific.ntly effect drainage fl~ T~ X -..~-~ 6. Will project affect any ~hreat~ne~ or endangered plant'or an~al species? , . · . . · . · Yes .X No 7. Will project reset in a major adverse effect on ~' X ' Y~s X ~o ' ' 9. 'dill project adversely i~pact any site or strnct- ute of historic, pre-historic, or paleontok~. importa ce or any site d~sig]at~d as a criticS1 D.~.C. X environmental area by a local agency? ~N~BON~E{'fAL ANA~~s ____ . 10. Will project have a m~Jor effect on e~isting or 4. future recreational opportunities? . . . .... ... Ye~ ~_ }~0 11. Will project reqult in major tr:~f['~c problems or 12. Will pro.]ect regularly cause objectionable odors~ ance as a result of the project's operation? . ~ -~- Yes --__ 13. Will project have any ~mpac~ cn public health or safety? . .......... . Yes X 14. Will project ~frect ~})e exist, in~ community by ; period ,n' ),ave a m3jc~' ne;ative eJ'l~ct on %),e characte~ of the~ality Cr~Flbornood?.. ---- 19S_ . ~' APPLI CATIOr PERMIT '( AP"UCAT ON ' Article 15 STREAM PRO1,ECTiON) Environmental Conservation Law [] For the construction, reconstruction or repair of a DAM or other impoundment structure. [] For the construction, reconstruction or repair of any permanent DOCK, pier or wharf; and any dock, pie or wharf, built on open work supports, which has a tOp-surface area of more than 200 square-feet. [] For the disturbanCe'of a STREAM BED or excavation in or fill of navigable waters .... ' [] Article 24 ( F R E S H W A i' E R W E T L A N D S) Environmental Conservation Law [~] A,icle25 (TIDAL WETLANDS)EnvironmentalConsewationLaw Read Instmcttofls on reverse side of last sheet before completing this application, PLEASE TYPE Og PgINT CLEARLY IN INK. * 1. NA~dE AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT First ~manuel H...i. ~r~t Addross 25Court Street Post Office Last Kontoko ta o TELEPH~O. NE NO._ B roi State NA~.E ~ND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If differ~ rErst M.I. Last Post Office i ' State Zip Code AGENCY SUBMITTING APPLICATION MAY 1 4 197g Z~p Code PROJECT DATA LOCATION OF WETLAND OR ADJACENT AREA, STREAM, OR BODY OF WATER Body of Water. ' . Gardtner'e ~-,. To,,wl L..:'___"_"_.., :.. ld ...... - -- __ ........ ,mm a con,only accepled and identiflaMe lan - SIZE OF WO~( SECTION. SPECIFIC, -- ~dmark er body of water or U.S.G.S. cooMmates. WILL ~/~NED LANDSt Dept. Public works Hap-E2 456 000;N 327 -"~E]Ves ~No channel; yards of matorlaJ to be removed, dreinin& dredRinR, filltng~ etc.) Pro.~ect to be located w~th~n 300 ft o¢ LZ zone A. Use Guidelin&s (If anyiq~TM ~O I R. Development Restrictions (If any}, 10. PURPOSE (H-~.";~ To construct 28 apartment d~elltng units and 2! motel untts with accessor), coffee:ShOp within 300 ft o¢ LZ zone. Parcel ts 9.2 acres. IF .~ D~AM OR OBSTRUCTION, INDICATE 12. PROPOSED STARTINC O^TE :He ght_ Size of Pond ~/79 ] 1/82 AND ADDRESS DE TWO OFFICIAL NEWSPAPERS IN LOCALITY WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY JS LOCATED - 1o Suffolk Times -~ :Ha~n Road 2. Long !sland Traveler ~atchman : One East Hain Street Greenport, Ney York 11944 Rtverhead, Hew York 15, CERT~FLCATION ~i hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted here- -with is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemea~r pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. As a condition to the issuance of a permit, the applicant accepts full legal responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and agrees ~to-itidb~nify and save ha'rmless the State from suits,actions, ~damages and costs of every name and description resi~lting frc;m the said project. '---...~. . . -- SEE REVERSE SIDE -- New York Stale Department of Environmental Conservation Environmental Analysis Unit Bldg. 40, SUNY - R~om 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 516-751-7900 Commissioner Robert F. Flacke Muriel Brush Southold Town Planning Board Maim Street Southold, New York 11971 Re: TW 15278-0143 Emanuel Kontokosta Dear Ma. Brush: We have received the above'referenced tidal wetlands application to .construct a one family dwelling (copy enclosed). While this project is unlisted making coordination optional, we should like to know if you desire lead agency status, and, if so, your determination of significance for the project. Your response by 6/5/79 would be appreciated. Verp/7 t r u._l.y/3yo~r~ ,o Roy.. Haje Alternate Local Tidal Wetlands Pe~it Administrator tLLH:ll Eric, t NEW YOR~ STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ~i.e...eALOANY, NEW YORK12233 APPLICATION F ERMIT[TLO ~%g)-/ -- APPLICATION ~ A~le 15 {STREAM P~OTECTION) Environment~l Conservation Law ~ For the construction, recollstructJo~ or repai~ of a D A M or olher impoundment sti~ctute. g For the construction, [e~nslruction or repair of any pem~anent DOCK, pier or wharf; and ~ny dock, pier or wh~t, built on open wmk supports, which hss a top surtace area ot more th~n 200 square teel. ~ For the distDrbance of a ST~EA~ BED or excavation in or fiji ot ~avigable waters. ~ Article24 (FBESHWATE~ WETLANDS) EnvironmentaI Conservation Law ~ Article2, (TIOAL ,ETLANOS)Envimnmen,alOon,etvat,onLaw 26 Court Street Post Office State Brooklyn Uew York NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (IJ dlnerenl from Applicanl) Street Address Post Office State Zip Code 13201 MAY 1 4 1979 ,3. AGENCY SUBMllTING APPLICATION N.Y.S.D.E.C. '4. PROJECT DATA LOCATION OF WETLAND OR ADJACENT AREA~ STREAM, OR BODY OF WATER Body of Water Town County Gardtner's Bay SouiLho)d Su~f_[olk L Locate by givJn& distance and direction from a commonly accepted and identifiable lan~ark or body o1[ water or U.S.C.S. coordinates. J S. SIZE OF WORK SECTION J6. SPECIFIC LOCATION 7. WILL PROJECT bTtLIZE STATE ~) J rI~NED LANDSr J Dept. Public works Hap-E2 456 OO0;N 3~7j ..... ~Yes ~lNo TYPE AND EXTENT OF WORK (Feet of new channel; yards of material to be removed, draJning, dredsing~ filling, etc.) ft of LZ zone Pro.lect to be located within 300 J 9. DOES PROJECT COMPLY WITH A. Use Guidelines (If any) ~'I O J g. Development Restrictions (11 any) I I0. PURPOSE (Hard~bip) To construct 28 apartment dwelling units and ~! motel units coffee shop within 300 ft of LZ zone. Parcel is 9.2 acres. with accessory u~ 11. IF A DAM OR OBSTRUCTION, INDICATE Height SizeofPond 12. PROPOSEDit/79STA~ING DATE APPROXIMATE COMPLETiO~ 11/82 DATE 14. NAMEANDADDRESSOF~OOFEICIALNEWSPAPERSINLOC^LITYWNEREPRO~SEDACTiViTYiS~OCATEO 1. Suffolk Times 2. Long Island Traveler ~atchman Hain Road One East )4atn Street Greenuort, New York 1194~ Rlvert~ead, New York ' 15. CERTIFICATION I hereby affirm under penalty of pedury that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted here- with is true to Ihe best o1' my knowledge and belief. False statemenJs made herein are punishable as a Class ^ misdemeanor pursuant to Seclion 210.45 of the Penal Law. As a condition to the issuance of a permit, the applicant accepts full legal responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits,actions, dama§es and costs of every name and description resulting irom the sa~d pJoject. 4/.~n/7q DATE SIGNATURE 9S-19-2 (2/77) - SEE REVERSE NEW YO?S~ TE BE ~.R[I L., t,F E~WIRON;~FN'f~ OHS;EI~VATIO~'I PROJECT PE,~IIT REO~Vj_R~IEFT DUESTID.NNAI~-E /he purpose of this questionnaire is to assist tile applicant in determining what, if any, Department Permits or approvals must be obtainc,! before starting work on a proposed project. If you are not sure if the action proposed is a regulated activity or is within an area subject to Department regulations (tidal wetlands, freshwater wetlands, etc.) contact our regional office for clarification. A pre- application conference with our staff to obtain guidance in the Department's permit application review process can be arranged. AN~..,~R ALL QUESTIONS NA/IE OF APPLICANT: E.M. Kontokosta, p.e. for Kontokosta Associates DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION & LOCATION: Propose to construct 28 apartment dwelling units and 21 motel units with accessory use coffee shop. 1. Realty Subdivision Approvals in Nassau Connty Does project involve suhdivision of land into 5 or more residential lots that will be served by a public or community sewage disposal system? X 2. Minims Permit Does project involve the uininz and co~nercial sale or off-site use of 1,000 tons of miperal within 12 calendar months (excepting excavation or grading in connection with on site construction or farm. lng)? X__' 3. Air Contamination Permit [,-~ or I4odifie~ SourceS: --~ ' Does project involve the constnmtion, modification -~"~-.~or operation of a boiler greater than 1 million BTU/hr rated heat input~ an incinerator or an industrial pro- X cess? b) Indirect Source' Does project involve construction or highway, airport or a parking facility ~~,~,'e~C~R-~.~'~' X more spaces? 4. Solid Uaste Hana~ment Permit Does project involve the sto'rlge, transfer, proC~n or disposal of solid waste? b!.'; - Q' X 5. !;ild~ Scenic & Recreational Rivers Permit " Only applies to certain lands within a-..'; mil~ the Carmans River. Consult D.E.C. Regional Office X for exact deteznninatiom. 6. Weter SnDpl¥ Permit Does project involve the acquisition of land or con- struction of facilities for water supply or distri- bution purposes? X 7. Lon~ Island Well Permit '" a) Does project involve the construction of a new well or deepening or increasing the capacity of an existing well to withdraw water at a rate greater thau 45 gallons a minute? b) Uill project require the temporary lowering of groundwater levels for construction purposes? X 8. Protection of Unters a) Will project change, modify or otberwise dis- turb the course, channel or bed of any stream classified C(T) or higher? (Consult the Regional'" Office for classifications). X b) Does project involve the temporary or per- manent artificial obstruction of a natural stream or watercourse? X c) Does project involve the construction or re- pair of a permanent dock, pier or whnrf having a top surface area more than 200-square feet? X ..... d) 'Does project involve any excavation or placing of fill is the navigable wat'ers of the State and adjacent wetlands? X NOT YES NO 2 9. Tidal l~etlands Permit I. Will project be located: a) in tidal waters, b) within 300-feet of either the landward edge of a tidal wetland boundary or a tidal body if water. NOT YES NO ~:OWN X l II. Will there be any subdivision of land or physical X. alterations of land or water? Exemptions to the above regulated locations if: 1) Project will be located at a ground elevation of 10-feet or higher above mean sca level (excepting on the face of a bluff or cliff). X 2) A substantial, man-made structure (such as a paved street or bulkhead) 100--feet or longer exists between the project sits and tidal wetlands or tidal water. (Consult D.E.C. Regional Office X if unsure.) 10. Freshwater Wetlands Permit a) Will project area be within, or within i00-feet of, a freshwater wetland or freshwater body of 12.4 acres or larger? X b) Will project involve draining, dredging, fil%ing, excavating, erecting structures, roads, utilities or other alterations or placing any form of pollution in a wetland? (Consult D.E.C. Regional Office if unsure). 11. Section 401 - ~ater Quality Certification Letter Does project or activity require a Federal Permit or License? If so, this State certlfication may be required prior to Federal approval X 12. State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ($POES} Permit Does project involve: --~ a) A proposed subdivision of 5 or mor~n~ts~. ~'---.~) A proposed or existing discharge of 1,000 gallons per day of sewage or any disch~ 1 of industrial or other wastes to ground waters? ~.¥.~. ~.~. C. c) Any discharge of sewage, industria~N~0NMg~I~At A~;A4¥~ ~ X other wastes to surface water? d) Any disposal of stormwater containing sewage industrial or other w~stes? X e) Any storage and disposal of potentially toxic or hazardous wastes? X 13. The following additional required D.E.C. permits have been applied for: Type of Appli. Permit No. Application Filing Date None Applicant's Name (If different from application now being submitted) 14. List all other permits, licenses or approvals required by other agencies of government: T~ of_Permit Governmental Status or Approval Agenc~ None I certify that the above i~.rm~tion ~is corr~t to t~e best of~my knowledge. 4/30/79 MATCH FOR PARCEL NO. SEE SEC. N0.0'~5-08'005 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF REARINGS Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provi- sions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Read, Southold, New York, Thurs- day, August 16, 1979, on the following hearings: 7:45 P.M. ~D.S.T.) Upon application of Frank and De- lores Davies, 16 Rese Court, Northport, New York (Gary F. Olsen, Esq. ), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art- icle I11, SectiOn 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient a'rea and width. Location of property: Lots No. 54, 55, and 56, Map No. 175, Tollewood, Mattituck, New York. 7:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Greenport Unit- ed Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenpert, New York, Iora special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f for petrols- sion to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Corner of Sound Road and County Road 27, Greenpert, New York, bound- ed on the north by Brandi: east by Sound Road; south by County Road 27, west by Ray- nor. 8:05 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Greenport Unit- ed Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenport, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f for permis- sion to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Corner of County Road 27 and Chapel Lane, Greenport, New York, bound- ed on the north by County Road 27; east by Shames and others; south by Price and Main Read (State Read 25); west by Chapel Lane. 8:15 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Greenport Crat- ed Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenpert, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f for permis- sion to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Main Road (State Road 25), Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by Main Road (State Read 25); east by Jurzenia; south by Reese and Sill; west by Dres- ses. 8:25 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Thomas F. and Margaret M. Maher, 144 Lo- cust Street, Garden City, New York, (Robert W. Gillispie, III, as agent), for a variance t? the Zoning Ordinance, Art- icle III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property, with i~suffieient area ano w~(lt~. Location of property: Leeton Drive, Southold, New York, _ .b~unded on the north by Long Is(ann Sound; east by Markel; south by Leeton Drive; west by Molloy. 8:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of William P. Ri- ley, Smith Drive North, Seath- old, New York (William B. Smith, as agent), for a var- iance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100~31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 23 through 27 inclu- sive, Map No. 1663, Map of Goose Neck Estates, Seathold, New York. 8:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Long Island Oyster Farms, Inc., 2835 Ship- yard Lane, East Marion, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-93 for permission to erect an eight (8) foot chain link fence in the rear yard area. Location of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, bounded on the north by Chereoowich. Reeve, Bohlke, Clark, Geeghegan, Kelly and Gregory; east by Mannglu, Watt, Tsatses, Muir, Wahrenburg and Southold Town; south by Orient Har- bor; west by Shipyard Lane. 8:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Thomas and Edith Perillo, 87 Old Country Road, Melville, New York. (Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art- icle III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York, bounded on the north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard: east by Weg- licki; south by Weglicki; west by Sidor. 9:10 P.M. ID.S.T.) Upon application of Raymond and Anna Ciacia, Main Road, Greenport, New York I James Bi(scs, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-80 ned Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 157, 158, 159 and 160, Map No. 1124, Peconic Bay Estates, Greenport, New York. 9:20 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Robert and An- ita Feagles, 21 Colony Road, West Hartford, Connecticut, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insuffic- ient area and width. Location of property: F~shers Equestrian Ave- nue, Island, New York, bounded on the north by Ocean View Avenue; east by Philipp; south by Beach Ave- nue; west by Equestrian Ave- 9:35 P.M. (D.S.T.I Upon application of Herbert R. Mandel, Inlet Lane Extension, Greenpert, New York, (John Geideman, as agent), for a variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance, Article 111, Section 100- 31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct an addition to a building with insufficient side yard. Loca- tion of property: Inlet Lane, Greenport, New York, bound- ed on the north by Clempner; east by Gull Pond; south by Conant; west by Inlet Lane. 9:45 P.M. (D.S.T.I Upon application of Clifford and Mary Eginton, Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, for a var- iance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article Ill, Section 100-32 for permission to construct a car- duly Sworn, ,e SUFFOLK aport, in said ! is a printed ~'eekly Times ...... weeks port in the front yard area. Location of property: Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, bound- ed on the north by Niedoreda; east by Deep Hole Drive: ............. south by Dohm; west by Deep Hole Creek. 9:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Lira-Con Enter- prises, In., 1455 Vets Highway, Hauppauge, New York, for a special exception to the Zon- lng Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-~0C2 for permis- sion to erect a sign that exceeds the height require- ments. Location of property: Northeast corner of Factory Avenue and Main Road, Mai- ti(ack, New York, bounded on the north by Bethany Ceme- tery Association; east by Beth- any Cemetery Association; south by Main Road IS(ate Road 251; west by Factory Avenue and Ardprop, Inc. 10:05 P.M. ID.S.T.) Upon application of Armando Cappa and Ann Hocking, Main Road, Sou(hold, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance, Article VIII, Section 100-81 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construe( an addition to an ~xisting building with insuffic- ient rear yard setback. Loca- tion of property: Old Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Old Main Road; east by Reiter: south by Bedd's Pond; west by Port of Egypt Enterprises. 10:15 P.M. (D.S.T) Uoon application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta, 26 Court ;Street, Brooklyn, New York, ~Rich- ard F. Lark, Esq.) for a spec- ial exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 100-50 B(3) & (4) and C(2), for permission to erect a 28 unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and a coffee shop. Location oI property: Ship- yard Lane, EaSt Marion, New York, bounded on t~he north by Parkside Heights Co.; east by Shipyard Lan& south by Gardiners Bay; west by Parl~- side Heights Co. Dated: August 6, 1979. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHt)LD TOWN BOARD OF A PPE AI~q; ITA9-3268 Avenue, Fishoz~.~, New York, bounded on the north by ~ Ocean View Avenue; east by Philipp; south by Beach Ave. hue; west by ]~questflan Ave- 9:3S P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Herbert R. Mandel, Inlet Lane Extension, C, reenport, New York, (,John C, eideman, as agent) for a variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article Ill, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Sche- dule for permission to con- struct an addition to a building with insufficient side yard area. Location of property: Inlet Lane, C, ceenport, New York, bounded on the north by Clempner; east by Gull Pond; south by Conant; west by Inlet lane. 9:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Clifford and Mary Eginton, Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, for a vari- ance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct a carport in the front yard area. Location of property: Deep Hole Drive, Mattituc~, bound- ed on the north by Niedoroda; east by Deep Hole Drive; south by Dohm; west by Deep Hole Creek.'~ 9:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Lira-Con Enter- prises, Inc., 1455 Vets High- way, Hauppauge, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-60C2 for permis. sion to erect a sign that exceeds the height require. meets. Location of property: Northeast corner of Factory Avenue and Main Road, Mat- tituck, New York, bounded on the north by Bethany Ceme- tery Association; east by Beth. any Cemetery Association; east by Bethany Cemetery Association; south by Main Road (State Road 25); west by Factory Avenue and Ardprop, Inc. 10:05 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Armando Cappa and Ann Hocking, Main Road, Southold, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article VIII, Section 100-81 and Bulk Parking Sche- dule for permission to con- struct an addition to an existing building with insuf- ficient rear yard setback. Location of property: Old Main Road, $outhold, Hew York, boUnded on the north by Old Main Road; east by Reiter; south by Budd's Pond; west by Port of Egypt Enterprises. 0:15 P.M. . application of Emanuel M. ~Kontokosta, 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, (Richard F. Lark, Esq.) for a special exception to the Zoning ordi- nance, Article V, Section 100. 50 B (3) & (4) and C(2), for permission to erect a 28 unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and a coffee shop. Location of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, bounded on the north by Parkside Heights Co.; east by Shipyard Lane; south by Gar- diners Bay; west by Parkside Heights Co. Dated: August 6, 1979 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS IT, 8/9/79 (942) PI.~ ~Pt ,el COUNTY OF ¢ r-r~, aU, STATE OF NEW YORK Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Sout¼old, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long] Island Traveler-Watch- man once each week for ........... J. ........................... weeks ~ucces~ivety commencing on the ""~'~I ................................. day .............. ............... ........... ............ ....... , ............ RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW August 13, 1979 Southold Town Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: Emanuel M. Kontokosta - Special Exception Gentlemen: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing three prints of an amended Plan dated 8/6/79 which I believe is in accordance with your request. RFL/mld Enclosures Very truly yours, LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARINGS Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions of the Amended Building Zone ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, Thursday, ~ August 17, 1979, on the following hearings: 7:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Frank and Delores Davies, 16 Rose Court, Northport, New York (Gary F. Olsen, ~sq.), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 54, 55, and 56, Map No. 175, Tollewood, Mattituck, New York. 7:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Greenport United Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenport, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f for permission to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Corner of Sound Road and County ~oad 27, Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by Brandi; east by Sound Road; south by County Road 27, west by Raynor. 8:05 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Greenport United Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenport, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f for permission to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Corner of County Road 27 and Chapel Lane, Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by County Road 27; east by Shames and others; south by Price and Main Road (State Road 25) west by Chapel Lane. 8:15 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Greenport United Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenport, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f for permission to erect an off-premises directional sign. Legal Notice of Hearings -2- Augus~ 16, 1979 Location of property: Main Road (State Road 25), Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by Main Road (State Road 25); east by Jurzenia; south by Reese and Sill; west by Drossos. 8:25 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Thomas F. and Margaret M. Maher, 114 Locust Street, Garden City, New York, (Robert W. Gillispie, III, as agent), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divide property with insufficient area and width. Loca- tion of property: Leeton Drive, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Long Island Sound; east by Markel; south by Leeton Drive; west by Molloy. 8:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of William P. Riley, Smith Drive North, Southold, New York (William B. Smith, as agent), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-3i and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. through 27 inclusive, Map No. Southold, New York. Location of property: Lots No. 23 1663, Map of Goose Neck Estates, 8:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Long Island Oyster Farms, Inc., 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-93 for permission to erect an eight (8) foot chain link fence in the rear yard area. Location of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, bounded on the north by Cherepowich, Reeve, Bohlke, Clark, Geoghegan, Kelly and Gregory; east by Manoglu, Watt, Tsatsos, Muir, Wahrenburg and Southold Town; south by Orient Harbor; west by Shipyard Lane. 8:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Thomas and Edith Perillo, 87 Old Country Road, Melville, New York, (Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York, bounded on the north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard; east by Legal Notic~ Hearings -3- ust 16, 1979 Weglicki; south by Weglicki; west by Sidor. 9:10 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Raymond and Anna Ciacia, Main Road, Greenport, New York (James Bitses, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-80 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 157, 158, 159 and 160, Map No. 1124, Peconic Bay Estates, Greenport, New York. 9:20 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Robert and Anita Feagles, 21 Colony Road, West Hartford, Connecticut, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Equestrian Avenue, Fishers Island, New York, bounded on the north by Ocean View Avenue; east by Philipp; south by Beach Avenue; west by Equestrian Avenue. 9:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Herbert R. Mandel, Inlet Lane Extension, Greenport, New York, (John Geideman, as agent), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to con- struct an addition to a building with insufficient side yard yard. Location of property: Inlet Lane, Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by Clempner; east by Gull Pond; south by Conant; west by Inlet Lane. 9:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Clifford and Mary Eginton, Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct a carport in the front yard area. Location of property: Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, bounded on the north by Niedoroda; east by Deep Hole Drive; south by Dohm; west by Deep Hole Creek. 9:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Lim-Con Enterprises, In., 1455 Vets Highway, Hauppauge, New York, for a special excep- tion to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-60C2 for permission to erect a sign that exceeds the height requirements._ Legal Notic~ Hearings -4- August 16, 1979 Location of property: Northeast corner of Factory Avenue and Main Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded on the north by Bethany Cemetery Association; east by Bethany Cemetery Association; south by Main Road (State Road 25); west by Factory Avenue and Ardprop, Inc. 10:05 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Armando Cappa and Ann Hocking, Main Road, Southold, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-81 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct an addition to an existing building with insufficient rear yard setback. Location of property: Old Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Old Main Road; east by Reiter; south by Budd's Pond; west by Port of Egypt Enterprises. 10:15 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta, 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, ~New York, (Richard F. Lark, Esq.) for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 100-50 B(3) & (4) and C(2), for permission to erect a 28 unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and a coffee shop. Loca- tion of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, bounded on the north by Parkside Heights Co.; east by Shipyard Lane; south by Gardiners Bay; west by Parkside Heights Co. Dated: August 6, 1979. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, AUGUST 9, 1979, AND FORWARD SIXTEEN (16) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION TO: BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YOKR 11971, BEFORE AUGUST 16, 1979. Copies mailed to the following on August 6, 1979: Gary F. Olsen a/c Frank and Delores Davies Greenport United Methodist Church Robert W. Gillispie, III a/c Thomas F. & Margaret M. Maher William B. Smith a/c William P. Riley Long Island Oyster Farms, Inc. Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino a/c Thomas & Edith Perillo James Bitses, a/c Raymond and Anna Ciacia Robert and Anita Feagles John Geideman a/c Herbert R. Mandel Clifford and Mary Eginton Armando Cappa & Ann Hocking Richard F. Lark a/c Emanuel M. Kontokosta Paul Axien Signs a/~ FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ................................................................. Date .................................................... 19Zf ...... % ....... ~.~.....~.~ ......... f..s..~ ................. / .,....... ............ ....~.~.~.....N~.~"J....Ze°^ ~ ~zr~u~' II PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated .......................... ~.~.~..~ ........ , 19.~' for permit to construct ............ m ........................... at the premises located at .................................... ~.J,U.~.~.)~.~.~ .......... ~6.~.~ ................. Street ~ Fq ~' D ~ ~- ~. J Map .................................... Block ............................................ Lot ................................................ is r~..~, h~rew,,h ~.d d,~o~o~ed o.~"h' 'o"ow'n~ ~rou.d~ ..... ~...~.~....~.~.. "'~: ............................. r' .................... V"O .............................. C_. ............ r. ............................ ~.....~X).~ ~ ...,~......~ ........ ~.~...~ ....... ~.....~ ........... ~ ......... ~ ................................... ~.~...¢...~ ....... Building Inspector E ~J K JUDITH T. TERRY · TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Southold, L. I., N. Y. 11971 July 24, 1979 TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 2579 application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta for a special exception. Also included are notification to adjoining property owners as follows: Brooklyn, New York 12201. JTT/bn cc:file Enc./ Parkside Heights Company, 8020 Colonial Avenue, RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW July 23, 1979 Mrs. Judith Terry Southold Town Clerk Town Hall - Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Special Exception - Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Mrs. Terry: In connection with the above-mentioned matter, I am enclos- ing the following: 1. Application for Special Exception in triplicate, sworn to by Emanuel M. Kontokosta. 2. Exhibit A - Site Plan by Kontokosta Associates dated 2-7-79. 3. Exhibit B - Notice of Disapproval of Southold Town Building Inspector. 4. Environmental Assessment Form executed by Emanuel M. Kontokosta. 5. Notice to adjoining landowners with affi- davit of ~rvice by certified mail. 6. My check payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of $15.00. Please forward the above to the Zoning Board of Appeals so that a hearing may be scheduled on this matter. RFL/mld Enclosures TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FO~M · _-~. ST?,tTT_'CNS ,:. *. (a) in or,er ~o answer ~he ques~icr, e Co c~e ~roJec~ site or p~:/sic~y ~i.er t~mn ~0 ac~s of 1~? ............ , Tee X No ' ~u~ !a~ fo~ fo~ o~ :he si=a? .... . Yes .X ~ ~o aR e~=~ %c~F Of wa=er? ......... :~ a~jace== si=es? .......... Tes .~, pith= or a~a~ species? ..... , , , . . . ~as X NO 8. Wi?, projec= have z '~Jcr ef~ec= en~cr~en=~ ~a ~ · [oc~ zEenc/? . . . ,, ~es X No fu~e rscreaclcn~ ~ppc~!~ies? .... cause a ~jcr ef~mc= ~o e:~ ~ns~a~auio~ ~=a~? ............ , Zee X No i~. W~,I~ ~rojec~ re~7 cause objecu!C~e ~c9 ~ rest= of ~he p~jecu's a~eraCzon? · ~sX FP~3~ ~ZQNAT ';~~' i: Owner/ 1 ~. Ronda & TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW APPLICATION FOB SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO TPLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. I, ~%~9 ..-.E.-.r~-...n..u-~..1.,,.-~.-~...-.K..9..n.~g..,~,~..~'~ ............................. ~f 26 ,C,g,.u?.,~.,,...~.$..~..99..~, ............................................ Name Street and Number Municipality State hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE V SECTION 100-50 SUBSECTION B(3) & (4) and C(2I THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS REQUESTED BECAUSE your petitioner is desirous of erecting a 28 unit apartment complex with 21 motel units in accordance with the site plan which is attached hereto:as Exhibit A, on his property on the westerly side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, The Building Inspector of the Town of Southold has denied your petitioner a building permit pending approval by the Board of Appeals of a special exception to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, A copy of the Notice of Dis- approval is attached hereto:as Exhibit B. The property is presently zoned M-1 General Multiple Residence District and the proposed use does not prevent the orderly and reasonable development of this property or the adjacent properties. The property is bounded as follows: on the north by vacant land which is zoned 'A" Residential and Agricultural District; on the east by Shipyard Lane and across Shipyard Lane is the Long Island Oyster Farms oyster process- ing plant which is zoned "C-i" General Industrial District; on the south by Gardiners Bay, part of Peconic Bay; and on the west by land of Parkside Heights Company which is presently vacant and zoned "M-i' General Multiple Residence District. The property is zoned for the proposed use and due to its location is well suited for a motel, apartment complex and as such is a proper development of the property. The proposed development of the property into a motel, apartment complex will not cause any undue increase of vehicular traffic congestion on any of the public streets in the Town of Southold. As seen from the attached plan, ample off-street parking is provided on the preraises. The water supply and sewage removal systems will be built in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Suffolk County Department of Health. There will be no overcrowding of the property as the land is ample for the proposed use. Due to the nature of the use, there will be no noxious odors, smoke, electrical discharges~ vibrations or noise. The property is not near any church, school, theater or recreational area. On account of the distance from any public facilities, a small coffee shop along with an administrative office is included as an accessory use, which ~s customary and incidental to the permitted use being requested as a special /~ exception under the Zoning Ordinance. STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss COUNTY OF Suffolk ) ~..~, ~to this ......~.~r.~ ........... day of .....J,~.l.y. ................... 19....7.~. ........ / Notar~ Public M~,RY LOU DoROSKI NOTARY pUBLiC, St~te of New yerk No. 52-1000S58 Suffo!k C~lnt¥ FORM ZB2 & TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YOF~' APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO TPLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. Name Street and Number Municipality N~ YOEk 11201 Sta~e hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL~ for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE V SECTION 100-50 SUBSECTION B($) ~ (4) and c(2) THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS REQUESTED BECAUSE yOIZT pe~tt/oner is desirous of erecting a 28 unit ~t co.lex w~th 21 ~o~el units in accordance w~th the ~it~ plan whi=h is &t~a~hed hm~o:ma Exl~bit &, on h~s property on the westerly s~ of Shipyard Lane, Ea~ ~uc~o~, New Xo~k. The Building Inspector of the Town of Southold has denied ~our petitioner a the Building Zone ordinance of %;he Town off Southold. ~ copy of the Notice o£ Di,,- approval is att~h~d hereto:a~ Exhibit B. The pz~erty is presently ~ ~-1 General Multiple ~ai~n~ D~i~ ~d ~ or ~ ad~t p~es. ~ p~ il ~d ~ foll~, on ~ ~ by v~t ~d ~ ~ ~ned "A" ~i~ ~ Agri~lt~Dii~i~;~ on ~e ~st ~ Shi~ ~ ~d a~ss S~py~ ~ is ~e ~ng Xs~d ~s~ F~ ~t~ ~ch is ~ly ~t ~ ~ "H-l" ~ ~tiple ~si~ D~i~. p~ is ~ foz ~e p~s~ ~e ~ due ~ i~ ~n is ~ll a~ ~oz a ~ p~s~ ~t o~ ~ p~ ~ a ~tel, ~t ~1~ will ~t ~e ~y ~ ~z~e o~ V~ ~affi~ ~ngestion on ~2 of ~e p~lic wi~ ~ b~lt ~ aocoz~--e wi~ ~ ~les ~ r~ti~ of ~ ~fo~ ~ for ~ pr~sed ~e. ~ ~ ~e ~t~ of ~ ~e, ~e~ ~11 ~ ~ ~o~ inol~ed ~ ~ ao~ use, ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ld~ ~ ~ ~tt~ ~e STATE OF NEW YOILK ) COUNTY OF ~uff~lk ] MARY LOU DOROSKI NO'(ARY pUBLiC, State of New No, 52-1000858 Suffe[k C~unty C~mmission ~xpires March 30, 1~:> FORM ZB2 SHIPYARD LAN~ LANE Re: Kontokosta II~?/~O , subject to the foJlwing conditions: 1. Approval from the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services. 2. Approval from the New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. 3. Approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for Site Plan. Approval from the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to Section 1331. 5. Approval of the sewage disposal systems from the Suffolk County Dept of Health. 6. No further subdivision except by application and approval from the Southold Town Planning Board and Board of Appeals and appropriate other agencies where required. 7. No residential structure shall be located within 100 feet of mean highwater line. No sanitary disposal facility shall be ~ constructed or installed within 100 feet ! of mean highwater line. A conservation buffer or easement having a minimum width of 50 feet shall be es- tablished along the shoreline. 10. No storm-water runoff resulting from the lT~velopment and improvement of the pending subdivision and any of the lots shall be discharged directly into Gard- iner's Bay.. BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of : EMANUEL M-~ KONTOKOSTA to the Board of Appea~$ gf the Town of Southo~d : TO: PARKSIDE HEIGHTS COMPANy NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: L 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Al~eals of t. he .Town of Southold to request a (~) (Special Exception) ~(the following relief: permzsszon to erect 28 apartments as multiple dwellings &:21motel units along with an administrative office ). and coffee shop as an accessory use. 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribedas ~Uows: on the westerly side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, bounded on the north by Parkside Heights Company, on the east by Shipyard Lane; on the south by Gardiners Bay and on the west by Parkside Heights C~mpar 3. Thatthe property whichisthesubjectofsuch Petitionislocatedinthefollowingzoning district: "M-i" General Multiple Residence District 4. That bysuch Petition, the undersigned willrequestthefollowingrelief: permission to erect 28 apartments as multiple dwellings and 21 motel units along with an administrative office and coffee shop as an accessory use, 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signedare: ArticLe V, Section 100-50, Subsections B(3) & (4) and C(2) 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the ~Ema~uefM. K~t~k~sta~/ right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: July 23, 1979 Post Office Address 26 Court Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 NAME PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ADDRESS PARKSIDE HEIGHTS COMPANY 8020 Colonial Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11201 STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: Mary Lou Doroski , residing atPeconic Bay Blvd., Laurel, New York , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 23rd day of July , 19 79 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- rice at Cutcho~ue, New York (certified) ~r-~g~'~) mail. Sworn to before me this 23rd day of July ~19 79 Notary Public ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by BARBARA DIACHUN Notary Public, State of New York NO. 52-4635190 Suffolk County_ ~o~]mission EXpires March 30, 19c~6 A~'~O~ 470' Ci IUV ~-u 5'~ I / ZONING ANALYSIS', REFERENCE; ZONINg, CHAPTER I00 FROIVi THE CODE THE TOWN OF ~OUTHOLD ZITE ~, ZONE I'-,1-1¢ GENERAl_ RESIDENCE DISTRICT AREA ; 9.199 A£RE~ OR 400~'70B. B,d;IFT. LOT COVERAGE; ALLOWABLE; RIFF, PAI~KIN~ ~.BI2LJ< 5GHEDULEE AS Af~ENDED 5/30/~5 BY L,L, NO, 3-'~ PROPOSED~('~_}APT, BLDO, = 15,750 (Z)~qOTEL BLDO= 15,050 ,, (1) ACCESSORY 4,~5 TOTAL °/o C0V ERASE', - ,08 = 8% 400,708 OWE~I~ U~IT ALLOWABLE; ~I U~IT = 90OO ~ LOT NOTEL UNIT, 6000¢ ~OT AREA (REF; IO0, H6) PROPOSED', ~SAPT UNITe = ~52,0OO 21 ~OTEL UNITS= 1~6,000 378,OOO~ BLDG LEN~T~ A~LOWABLE¢ I~~ b4AX, L6~ (REF: 100,SZ) HEIGHT OF BLUE. REF, iO0.1~FORS~PED ROOF ~EAN HEIGHT BETWEEN EAVE AND RIDE~ TO FI NISH ~RADE ~ FRONT 0F BLDE, PROPOSED', LENETH: 1~5~ H~I6~T: DISTANCE BE%WEEN ELDEr: 40~ DI~T, BET. BLDG, &A~E~¢, = ~0I LLVABLE FLOOR~IN, ALLOWED;~50~ AREA', PROPOSED~ 960 ¢ (5~ALLEST UNIT) (.cF. ~oo, s~) OFF-STREET (REF, PARI<IN6 & BU~ ~CHEDULE) PA~KIN~: REQUIRED; ~B CAR~-APT~ ~4 OARS - ~OTELS SET BACKS (REF, PARKIN~ & ~ULK FRONT YARD: R~QUI~D: SO~ PROPOSED ', 50I PROPOSED: gOI PROPOgED~ lO0~ R~AR YArD f REQUIREB~ ~0~ BLDG. HEIGHT/(R~F, PARt(lNG & BULK SCHEDULE) KEY ' A EXIJTINE~ CON TOUI~ EX 15TI N~ CON TOUF~¢ TO I~,EVtAIN NEW CON TOUI~ KoNTOKOSTA ASSOCIATES Engineers & Architects 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201 PROPOSED; SHIPYARD LANE Date Scale ,,' I"= 50I Job No. GRAPHIC SCALE; Title Dwg. No. I00 FT 5liE DEVELOPMENT PLAN I~, oo 0 / / f ../ I / ~) , % I "" 5%,: / t I "//' / ' 1 I ~ I %, iI / ~ /1 / / / / / i~ / I I I t i /11 / × / EXHIBIT REFERENCEf ZONING~CHAPTERIOO FROM THE CODE THE TOVVN OF 5OUTHOLD ZONE r~-l, GENERAL RESIDENCE DIS'FRICT ARBA',D,ISDACR65 OR 4OO,TOB, LOT COVERAGE: AL~WABLE: R6~, pARKiNG ~ BULK 5CHEDdLE i A~ A~BNDED S/~o~s (I)ACCESBOR¥ BLDG, TOTAL '~COVERAGE:~O 400,705 DWELLING UNIT ALLOWABLE; !IREF; B¼DG LENGTH ALLOWABLE~ i%5' F4AX. LENGTH 56PARATION REQUIRED ; ~O~ OR 'Z x BLDG HEIGHT (F',EF: IOO,SZ) HEIGHT OF BLDFo, REF, IOO,iS,FOR~LOPED ROOF ~EAN H61GHT BETWEEN EAVE AN'D R~DS~ TO FI N~SH ~RADE ~ FRONT 0F PEOPOSED'. LENGTH: iZS' HEIGHT: DISTANCE BETWEEN BLDGS:40 D~57. BET, BLDG, LIVABLE FLOOR NtN, ALLOWED:~OO~BTUDtO¢i AREA', PROPOSED', ~11 ~ ( STUDIO UNIT) (KEF. IOO, 53) OFF - CT~EET (REP, PARI<I~G & BULK SCHEDULE) PROPOSED: (~C/NRG-]DWI'.iLL UNIT5 4' CAR~ -~CN~ BLDO. pROPOGED; 50~ ONE 5~DE WARD',REQUIRED f ZO~ P ROPOGED: ~O~ DOTH SlD~ y~,D:REQUI RE D~, PROPOSED*, [O0~ PROPOSEDf I00~ FIEIGHT~(REF, PARNIN5 & BULIK SCHEDULE5 PROVOGED f ZOI ./ J~l~Ul~Y2~.l ~ I Revisions .. r4Al' ~, KONTOKOSTA ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS 4,3 WEST S4TH STREET NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK 10019 _..5 HI P"F'AP--D LANJ .PROJ EOT :=ou-FHot. , Title SITE DF--VF-..LOPNE OWNER OF ADJAOENT PA~OEL PARKSIDE HF. I6MTC` ,/ '"~L~/"~./JtM~ ?0f214¢ . ' ' '% '% '%, %,% ,/ ZONING ANALYSIS; AC, ANIENDeD $/30/55 BY L,L, ilO, 3-'/~ PROPOSED:('Z}APT, BLDG, = 13,750 ~ (E)~OTEL BLO6= 15,050 ,, (1)ACCE550R~ 4, ZZ5 ,, BLO~, TOTAL 33,025 ~ "/o COV ERASE; 33,0Z5 400,708 = ,08 = 5% DWELLING UNIT ALLOWABLE; ~T UNIT: 9000 ~ LOTAR~ ~0TEL UN IT, 6000~ LOT (REF; 100,116) PROPOSED: ~APT UNIT5: Z52,000 21 NOTEL UNITS= I~6,000 ,, 378,000~ 378,000~<400,708~ 2. DENSITY OK ELD6 LENGTH ALLOWABLE5 IZS' ~AX. LEN~TH CEPARATION REQUIRED ; tO~OR ZxBLDG (REF: 100.52) HEIGHT OF BLDG. REF, ROOF ~EAN HEI6HT BETWEEN EAVE AND RIDGE TO F I NI 5H GRADE ~ FRONT OF ~LDG, PROPOSED'. LENeTH: l~5' HEIGHTt Dl~T, BET, BL~. &~E~. LIVABLE FLOOR ~N, ALL0WED:850~ AREA'. PROP0~ED~ 980 ~ (5HALLEST UNIT) (.e~. ~oo, s~) OFF-STREET (EEF, PAEI~IN6 & BU~ SCHEDULE) PROPOSED: ~8 CAR~ ~4 GAR~ - MOTE~ SET BACKS (REF, PARKIN~ & ~ULK SCHEDULE') F~NT YAR~: RE~UIREO~ 50~ P~POSE~', 50~ P ROPO~E D [ ~0~ PROPOSED~ I00~ PROPOSED: lO0~ BLD6. HEI~HT~[REF, PARNIN~ & BOLKSCHEDULE~ N&X, ALLOWED', ~5m P~OPOSED; ZOm REFERENCE¢ ZONING~ CHAPTER I00 FROM THECODE THE TOWN OF ~OUTHOLD, ~ITE ¢ ZONE [',4-1., ~ENE~At_ RESIDENCE DI¢TRICT AREA; 9,199'ACRE5 ..:OR 400~ 7OB, ~ FT; ' j LOT 6.OVERA6E; ALLOWABLE: REF, PARKIN6, ~,BIJL~ $CP, EDULE I EXIST lNG CONTOUR5 EX 15TI N~ CON TO,iRS 'TO REMA IN KEY/ En rs & e ec ' 26 Ceur~t, Street, Brooklyn, New,::YO[~?Jl20! KO '",~0 KOS, Ta PROPOSED¢ .SHIPYARD LANE', T~ttle :' DwL No. '14 I0 0IO~ZO$O,qO~O IOOFT ; ':: . Ir ' .Ii~ ~ r BO^LE: l, '" ' ' 'Il', ",";':5' "J ' OWNER, OF ADJACENT PAF:C.,EL. PARI<51DE HE. ieHT$ CO, ' AppRox. ~.?01 / M R K GRAPHIC GCALE; lO o ~0 ?J~3040EO IOOFT 5CAI-E: I"--SOI ZONING ANALYSIS; REFEREN~;E¢ ZONIN~ CHAPTER I00 FROM THECODE THE TOWN OF' 5OUTHOLD -- ~ITE/, ZONE iVl-l~, ~ENE. BAL RESIDENCE DtSTR CT ,A~: 9,199~CRESY~R 400~ ~06, ~ FT. ~T ~VERABE, ALleLE: REF, P~KIN~ ~BU~ ~HEDU~E PROP0~ED~(~ APT, BLDG, = l%750 ~Z)~OTEL BLOC= 15,050 (1)AOCESSOR~ = 4, ZZ5 ,, BLOC, TOTAL 5~,oz5 ~ - % COVERAGE', 33,0Z5 ~00,~0~ DWELLIN6 UNIT ALL. ABLE; ~T UNIT = 9000 ~ tOT AR~ HOT E L UN IT. 6000 REF: 100,116) PROPOSED'. ~APT UNIT5 ~1 HOTEL UNITS: iCE,000 37~,000~ BLD~ LENGTH ALLOWABLE; 1~5~ MAX, LENGTH SEPARATION REQUIRED ; ~0~ OR Ex BLDg. HEiEHT' (REF: [00,5~) HEIEH~ OF BLDE. REF, ROOF MEAN HEIGHT BETWEEN ~AVE AND RIDEE TO FINISH ~RADE ~ FRONT OF BLD~, PROPOSED: LENETH: It5 DISTANCE B~WEEN BLDGS: 40~ DIG%, BET. BLDG,&A~E55, = ~0~ LIVABLE FLOOR ~IN, ALLOWED; 8SO ARE~'. PROPODED~ 980 ~ (5~ALLED~ UNIT) (REF, 100,5~) ~ CA~5 - ~OT~LS 54 CARS - ~OTEL5 SET ~ACK5 ~EF. PAR~N~ &~ULK SCHEDULE) FRONT YARD', RE~UIRED~ 50' PROPOSED: 0N~ 51O~ ~ARD:RE~UI R ED ~0THSI~ Y~:RE~UIRED { PROPOSED: 100~ BLDG. HEIGHT:(REF, PAEKING & BULK SCHEDULE~ PROPosED; ~Oi PARKING I< EY ", EXIST INF~ E. ON TO U 12-~ lEX 15TI NG ¢ONTOuR$ TO ~Ei'lalkl ~,-6- 79 / I OWNER OF ADJAC. E:N'T PAf~-.C..EL PARI(SIDE HF_.I~HT~ C.O. '1 / ./ GRAPHIC SCALE (kEF: ZONING ANALYSIS; REFERENHE,, ZONiNg, (;t..{APTIER IOO FRO THE TOWN OF: 5;OUTHOLD SITE ~, ZONE {"/I-1, GENERAL RESIDENCEDISTR LOT C. OVERAe, E; ALLOWABLE; REF, PAI~KIN~, AS. AI"~ENDED $/-~o,/7,s . BLOG= , 5 (L1) ACCE550F~ =;, ' YOTAL ' 400,708 = 'DWELLIFI6 UNIT ALLOWABLE;. APT UF iVi0T EL UN PROPOSED; ~-~AeT UNIT5: .7-5~,~0P ~ ~ ~;,, BLDG LENGTH AL. LOWABLE.~ I'ZS' MAX SEPARATION REQUIRED'.' ; ~O~ OR.Zx E ' (REF: IOO,SZ) HEIGHT OF BLDr~. RE~',! RIDGE TO. FI;N!~H'~(~RADE'~ FRON;1 ,. 34, GAR~ - hlOTEi,.5 ' H 5ET BACKS. (REF, PARKINg. & 5ULK 5& EDU,L.E~ PROPO'~ED 50 ON~ 51DE YARD;RE{2UI RED ,' ~O~ pROPO,SED; gO~ BOTH 51D,E YARD:R EQU I:R ED ", PROPQSED',. IOO~ gEAR YARD f RE(~UIRED; ~ROPOS, ED~IOO BLpG. HEI.GHT (EEF, ?AR'KINC~& ~ULK ~CHEDULE~.'..' ", IvtA'X, ALLOWED ', ~*~; I Engineer 26 Court Street OWNER OF ADJACENT PARC. EL PARKS'IDE HEI~HT$ C.O. ?, O-~T~L R K GRAPHIC SCALE: ~C, AL.E ~ I" = ~01 I00 FT ZONI,N , 'ANALY 5; ":-'" "' REFI~RENCE¢ ZONING, CF~,PTBR I00 FROM THE CODI? THE TOWN OF 50UTHOLD ~ITE ~ ZONE ~d, ~ENEBA~ REsIDENCE'DISTRICT (E)~OTEL BLD6= 15,O50 ( 1 )AOCESSO~ = 4, Et5 ,, 8L06' - ] /. TOTAL 3~,025 $ = ,O8 = 8% :' 400,708 OWELLIN6 UNiT ALLOWAStE; ~ UNiT = 9000 ~ LOT ~0~EL U~ m 6000~ UO~ PROPO~EO', ZSA~T UN~T~ ~ Z52,0OO ~7s,oo-o~ B~D6 LENGTH AELOWABLE9 ;~5' MAX, LEN6TH SEPARATION REQUIRED ; 20' OR Z x BLD6. HEIGHT' (REF; [O0,5Z) ' HEIGH~ OF BLO6, REF, IO0,1~, FOR 5~PED ROOF MEA~ HEI6HT BE%WEEN EAVE AND ~ID6E TO FINISH ~RADE ~ FRONT 0F P~OPOSED~ EENSTM: IZ~* HEI6HT ', [0~ DISTANCE BE%WEEN BLD85440~ LIVABLE PLOOR ~lN, ALLOW6D;.850 ~- AREA', PROPOSED ¢ 960 ~ (5~ALLEST UNIT) (~ES. ~o0.~) OFF-~TREET (REF, PARI<ING & 8U~ PRQPOSED~ ~,GAR5-APT5 34 GAR~ - ~OTEL5 5ET BAcK$ {REF, PARKIN~ &DULK FRONT YARD: RE~UIRED ~ ~0 ' PROPOSED', PROPOSED ~ ~0' PROPOSED: IOO~ BLD6, HEI6HT:(R6~, PARKIN6 & BULK 5CHEDULE~ PROPOSED ~ ~OI KEY NEW 2'6 ce, Urif~!' ,reet,,