Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-31.-3-11.31
PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREM~RS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI March 17, 2011 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Lawrence C. R6, Esq. R6, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC at East Marion Fire District Located at 9245 Main Road, East Marion SCTM#1000-31-3-11.31 Dear Mr. R6: Enclosed is a check in the amount of $2,000 which represents reimbursement of Site Plan and Special Exception application fees in connection with the above application. Since these fees were received by us, the Town Board changed the Code so that this application is now exempt from Site Plan and Special Exception approval requirements. HeafTher Lanza, AICP Planning Director Enc. cc: Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board Bo4eeting of March 15,2011 RESOLUTION 2011-231 ADOPTED Item # 5.13 DOC ID: 6714 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 2011-231 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON MARCH 15, 2011: RESOLVED the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes a refund of $2000.00 ($1000 application fee and $1000 Special Exception fee) in Deferred Account B.691 to T.~- Mobile for its project at East Marion Fire Department which is now exempt from approval requirements as a result of a Town Code change in 2010. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Louisa P. Evans, .~ustice SECONDER: Christopher Talbot, Councilman AYES: Ruland, Talbot, Krupski .Ir., Evans, Russell ABSENT: Vincent Orlando Generated March 16, 2011 Page 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: John Cushman, Comptroller From: Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chair Date: March 8, 2011 Re: Fees in Deferred Account B.691 for T-Mobile at East Madon FD Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-31-3-11.31 In summer of 2010, the Town Board changed the Code so that this application is now exempt from Site Plan and Special Exception approval requirements. Therefore, the Planning Board hereby requests a refund of all fees paid, which have remained entirely in the Deferred Account. The total amount paid was $2,000 ($1,000 application fee and $1,000 Special Exception fee). Please prepare a check in the amount of $2,000 payable to T-Mobile USA, Inc. and delivered to the Planning DepartmenL Thank you. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE Date: Name: Telephone: ~ I - ~c/c/- (~ *'7 ~ Mailing Address: '~ 0 ~:>o ~ ~ SCTM# of site you are Inquiring about: Query: (Please be specific about the information you need. Provide supporting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) dAN 2 4 2011 Planning Staff will attempt to respond as quickly as the workload permits. But, depending on the questions, and the research involved to answer them, please undemtand that it may be several days before we can get back to you. MILICIA ELECTRIC CORP PO Box 6194 North Babylon, NY 11703 631-694-0751 (phorte) 631-694-0754 (fax) December 2nd 2010 Town of Southold Planning Department 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: T-Mobile cell site at 9245 Ma n Road. East Marion, NY Pemfit No. 35878 Count), lax Map No. 473889 Section No. 031 Block No. 0003 Lot No. 011.031 To Whom It May Concern The T-Mobtie cell site at 9245 Mmn Road in East Marion is construction complete. We would like to request a final inspection fa'om thc Town of Southold Planning Dcpartment for this site. Ple:~se contact Jonathan or Frank from Milicia Electric Coq). at 631-694- 0751 with the date and time office inspection mtd we will have a representative fi-om our company on site tbr lhe inspection. Sincerely, ..~/" Frank Mi!icia President of Milicia Electric Corp. DEC - 3 2010 Milicia Electric Corp PO Box 6194 North Babylon, NY 11703 631-694-0751 (phone) 631-694-0754 (fax) FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/2/2010 TO: Planning D.e~artment 631-765-3136 FROM'. Milicia Electdc FAX: FAX; 631-694-0754 TEL; TEL.' 631-694-0751 CC; PAGES: 2 COMMENTS: MILICIA ELECTRIC CORP PO Box 6194 North Babylon, NY 11703 631-694-0751 (phone) 631-694-0754 (fax) December 2nd, 2010 Town of Southold Planning Department 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: T-Mobile cell site at 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY Permit No. 35878 County Tax Map No. 473889 Section No. 031 Block No. 0003 Lot No. 011.031 To Whom It May Concern: The T-Mobile cell site at 9245 Main Road in East Marion is construction complete. We would like to request a final inspection from the Town of Southold Planning Department for this site. Please contact Jonathan or Frank from Milicia Electric Corp. at 631-694- 0751 with the date and time of the inspection and we will have a representative from our company on site for the inspection. Frank Milicia President of Milicia Electric Corp. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE Date: Telephone: ~ I - (cc/q - (~ ? ~ [ Mailing Address: '~ ~ (~ t~.(~)z[c~-, SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: ~ I - ~- l ~. ~ I Query: (Please be specific about the information you need. Provide supporting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) JAN 2 4 2011 Planning Staff will attempt to respond as quickly as the workload permits. But, depending on the questions, and the research involved to answer them, please understand that it may be several days before we can get back to you. For Office Use Only - Routed to: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCEHSKI October 7, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Lawrence R~, Esq. R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 T-Mobile Northeast LLC at East Madon Fire Distdct Located at 9245 Main Road, East Marion SCTM#1000-31-3-11.31 Dear Mr. Rb: Enclosed is a check in the amount of $7,710.25 which represents reimbursement of unused escrow funds for consultant fees in connection with the above application. We received and paid the final invoice from CMS for $789.75 out of the $8,500.00, leaving the balance amount which we are refunding to you. Sincerely, Martin H. Sidor cc: Southold Town Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Kristy Winser, Senior Planner 0. C 8,500'00 Invoice Date NeW York. PaYment ~ber & Coughiin Larry Re Number Invoice Total Signature Company Name Payee Certification Dat~ I¸ i Vendor Addr~s VouCher VTdor No. Title 36 North New York AVe. Huntington, NY 11743 Net ] tharch~e Ord~ I Amount Cl~im~ Numb~ [ D~fipfi~ of Goo~ or Ser~ic~ 7,710.251 ' I Feimbursement escrow funds re: 7,710.25 consultant review wireless application (7,710.25 Marion 31-3-11.31(SCTM#) / t Check No. ~D~ r~d~k Department Certification Town of Southold, New York - PaYment Voucher Vendor N~fme Center for Municipal Solutions Vendor Telephone Number Vendor Contact Richard A. Comi Invoice Invoice Number Date 31131-001 10/1/10 Vendor Addre,~ 70 Cambridge Dr. Payee Certification Signature Company Name Gleamont, NY 12077 Invoice Net Pmchase Order Total Discount Number 789.75 789.75 21318 Vendor No. 3221 Title Cheek ,En~r~ by A~i~t D~te, 1~own Clerk Consulting svces. app. @ E. Marion 31-3-11.31 Department Certification Date Client: Southold NY T-Mobile 9425 NYS Rt.25 East Marion Invoice #:31131-001 Date: 1 -Jun 1-Jun 1-Jun 1-Jun 23-Aug 27-Aug 30-Aug 30-Aug Invoice The Center for Municipal Solutions 70 Cambridge Dr. Glenmont, NY 12077 Description (518)439-3079 Site visit with the Southold's Planning division Mileage 30.5 @$50 Shelter Island Fern/ Travel time to/from Southold discuss with Lanza those items needing review and send letter to her on same discuss with Planning Dir. Those items needing review review application material, prepare and distribute letter Reviewed selected application materials TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 789.75 I, Richard A. Comi, certify that the above account in the amount of $ 789.75 is true and correct; that the items, cervices and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated; that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes, from which the municipality is exempt, are not included; and that the amount claimed is actually due. 9/01/10 Date Signature 10/1/2010 Hrs Rate: 0.5 $ 250.00 0.8 $ 125.00 0.2 $ 250.00 0.2 $ 250.00 0.8 $ 250.00 1.0 $ 250.00 Expenses. Amount $ 125.00 $ 15.25 $ 5.75 $ 93.75 $ 50.00 $ 5O.OO $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $ 21.00 $ 768.75 (Electronic Signature) FINAL INVOICE Page 1 of 2 Winser, Kristy From: Sent: To: C¢: Winser, Kristy Fdday, September 17, 201b 2:19 PM 'Marisa Knoth' John couglin (E-mail) Subject: RE: T-Mobile at East Marion Fire District, 9245 Main Road, East Marion This is to inform you that the application materials submitted in connection with the above referenced qualify for a building permit with two conditions: 1. Filing the revised Building Permit Application for T-Mobile's existing LIPA site with the Building Dept. prior to receiving the building permit for the subject property. (Received 9/3/10) 2. Submission of a new landscape plan. (Received 9/2/10) It should be noted that the Planning Board has determined that T-mobile is showing an effort to permit the facility by submitting the revised building permit application, which demonstrates your intention to carry out the permitting process. It is further noted that a certificate of occupancy should not be granted for the subject application until the permitting process for LIPA site is complete. As such, both conditions have been satisfied. Your application meets the general requirements of Section 280-70 and 280-71 A.2.(b). The landscaping must be planted as shown and maintained to qualify for a certificate of occupancy. At this point, the Building Department has been notified of the above and you should follow up with them on the status. As for the LIPA Site, you should expect a revised Notice of Disapproval directing you that a ZBA, site plan and special exceptions are required for this site. I hope this is helpful. Let me know ifI can assist you with anything further. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kri ~s~,~/j_ns~L~ !9~n. s 9~_t._h..o.J_d_. n~y. u_s ..... Original Message ..... From: Marisa Knoth [mailto:mknoth@rnhclaw.com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 12:49 PM To: Winser, Kristy Cc: 3ohn Coughlin Subject: T-Mobile at East Marion Fire District, 9245 Main Road, East Marion Good Afternoon Kristy, 9/17/2010 Page 2 of 2 Please be advised that this afternoon, our office filed the revised Building Permit Application for T- Mobile's existing LIPA site with the Building Department. Please see the attached correspondence regarding this submission. Please advise as to when T-Mobile's Building Permit for the subject site (East Marion F.D.) will be issued and whether we should follow up directly with the Building Department in that regard. We appreciate your continued assistance with this matter. Thankyou. Marisa Knoth RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 (631) 425-4100 (telephone) (631) 425-4104 (facsimile) mknot h(~t~,rnhclaw.com This e-mail message and attached files, if any, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain information protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or his/her agent, any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of the information in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by re'ply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message. 9/17/2010 NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW NORTH NEW Yoas Av~su~ HUNrXNOTON, NEW YOr, X 11748 T]~rr~oN~: (0~:1) 425-4100 F&osx~x~s: (031) 425-4104 September 1,2010 By Hand Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board To~vn Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: T-Mobile Northeast LLC Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York SCTM#: 1000-31 3- 11.31 Dear Ms. Winser: As you know, we represent T-Mobile Northeast LLC ('T-Mobile') with regard to its application to colocate at the existing public utility wireless telecommunications facility at the subject property. Pursuant to the request of Heather Lanza, Director of Planning, we enclose herewith two (2) original signed/sealed Landscape Plans, prepared by Bay State Design, Inc., and dated August 27, 2010 (Rev. 2). Please note that three (3) counterparts of the Landscape Plan are being submitted with the Building Department today as well. With regard to the Ms. Lanza's request that T-Mobile submit its revised application to the Building Department for the LIPA substation property in Greenport, please note that same will be submitted as soon as possible. While revising some of the materials for the re-submission to meet the recently amended Wireless Code, it was noted that the LIPA substation property falls within 100' of freshwater wetland boundaries and, accordingly, additional materials are in the process of being prepared. Please rest assured that we will make the re-submission as soon as our office receives the additional revised materials. Very truly yours, RI~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By:_ .)Ooa coug JC:mk Enclosures Cc: Mr. Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector (with three (3) signed/sealed Landscape Plans) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To; From: Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Heather Lanza, Planning Director c~ ~ Date: August 31, 2010 Re~ Planning Report - Wireless Facilities Building Permit Application T-Mobile co-location. East Marion Fire District. The Planning Department has reviewed the application referenced above pursuant to Southold Town Code {}280-74 B(2) to determine if it qualifies for a building permit at this time. This application qualifies for a building permit on two conditions: The applicant must submit a revised building permit application for the unpermitted wireless facility at the LIPA station in Greenport on tax map #1000-45-1-14.1 prior to receiving the building permit for the subject property (carriers with unpermitted facilities in Southold cannot be issued permits for new facilities - the Planning Board has already determined that T-Mobile is showing an effort to permit the facility (in granting approval for their Cutchogue site plan) - thus submitting the revised building permit application further demonstrates their intention to carry out the permitting process. A certificate of occupancy should not be granted for the subject application until the permitting process for LIPA site is complete). 2. The applicant must submit a new landscape plan that is a duplicate of the attached plan except that the new plan will be signed and sealed by the company that produced it. The application meets all the General Requirements of Section 280-70, and all the requirements of 280-71 A.2.(b). The base equipment will be entirely concealed from view as shown on the landscaping plan to be submitted (see # 2 above). The landscaping must be planted as shown and maintained to qualify for a certificate of occupancy. 518439-3079 GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 FAX: 518478-0909 August 30, 2010 (Via email and regular mail) Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: T-Mobile 9245 Main Road East Marion Dear Ms. Lanza, Per our discussion, we have reviewed the application material in regards to sections 280-70 (c) and (k). We find the application material complete for these sections. If you require anything further please let us know. Sincerely, ;~.a4. ~ (electronic signature) Richard A. Comi CMS Cc: Kristy Winser (via email) Denise Benun (via email) T-Mobile m~ M ~ ~ ~ .~1t~ ~' · ~ ' I ~ I.[ I " ' -- ~'I iI - T ~- ~' i 'J~ [~ ~1 ~ ~Y~ I ' ,~ ~ ~ I ) ~ ~ ~ ~ // , ' , ! .-' ~~ . ~., ~. ~ ~ ~ COMPOUND ~ V~' = ~'-~' ~DS~E P~ ~~-~ Z-2 THE I~[~NTER FOR MUNICIPAL 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD 518~439-3079 GLENMONT, NEW YORK 12077 SOLUTi~S FAX: 518-478-0909 August 30, 2010 (Via email and regular mail) Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: T-Mobile 9245 Main Road East Marion Dear Ms. Lanza, Per our discussion, we have reviewed the application material in regards to sections 280-70 (c) and (k). We find the application mater/al complete for these sections. If you require anything further please let us know. ~ichar~ 7C(omV' CMS Cc: Kristy Winser (via email) Denise Benun (via email) ,' Lanza, Heather From: Sent: To*. Cc: Subject: John Coughlin [jcoughlin@rnhclaw.com] Monday, August 30, 2010 9:42 AM Lanza, Heather Winser, Kristy; Marisa Knoth RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed Tl~ank you, Heather! I will have %Mobile prepare the hard copies for submission to the Town. Should they be filed with your department or with Building? Yours truly, John John .]. Coughlin R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York :11743 Telephone: (63:1) 425-4:100 Facsimile: (63:1) 425-4104 E-Mail: icouq hlin (~ rnhclaw.com lids c-mail message and attached files, if any, arc confidential and intended solely lbr thc use of the addressee(s) named above, lhis communication may contain informalion protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. [lyou are not tile intended ~ecilvient or his/her agent, any review, use, dissemination, tbrwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of the infnrmation in this c-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this confidential communication in errer, please notil? the sender mmediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message. From: Lanza, Heather [mailto:heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:27 AM To: John Coughlin Cc: Winser, Kristy; Harisa Knoth Subject: RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed That note is acceptable. Thank you. Heather Lanza From: John Coughlin [mailto:jcoughlin@rnhclaw.com] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 4:49 PM To: Lanza, Heather Cc: Winser, Kristy; Marisa Knoth Subject: RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed Heather, The current note provides "Carriers will maintain screening for the life of the facility (towards the bottom/left). If acceptable, I will have T-Mobile finalize the prints and get them out to you asap. 1 As to the BP issuance on this site being conditioned on the filing of the revised BPA on the LiPA site - I think that is acceptable, Yours truly, John John J. Coughiin R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York :[1743 Telephone: (631) 425-4100 Facsimile: (631) 425-4104 E~lVlail: jcoug hlin(~rn hclaw.com Fhis e-mail message and attached files, if any, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above, rhis comnmnication may contain inlbrmation protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges, ll~you are not the intended recipient or his/her agent, any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of the inlbrmation in this e-mai} is strictly prohibited. If you have received this confidential communication error, please noti[~, the sender immediately b,x reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message. From: Lanza, Heather [mailto:heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 4:36 plY1 To: John Coughlin Cc: Winser, Kristy; Marisa Knoth Subject: RE: East IVlarion FD colocation info needed John, That is some great landscaping plan. It looks like it does the trick. 1'11 get the consultant's report on Monday on the few technical aspects, and get my report down to the Building Department by Tuesday next week. Could you put the statement of landscape care right on the landscape plan itself (if it isn't already there?). Five copies of the plan should be enough. I thought that perhaps I could do a condition on the report that you meet all the requirements to get the Building Permit for the East Marion site once you have submitted the revised application on the LIPA location to the Building Department. The rationale to allow us to move forward on the building permit despite this unpermitted location still outstanding will be that the East Marion location is ideal because it will not be visible. Does that sound fair? Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-math heather.lanza~town.southold.ny.us i From: John Coughlin [mailto:jcoughlin@rnhdaw.com] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 4;20 PM To: Lanza, Heather Cc: Winser, Kristy; I~larisa Knoth Subject: RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed Heather, Attached hereto is a pdf of the proposed additional landscaping, which shows such landscaping around ail existing and proposed equipment. If acceptable, please let me know how many hard copies you require and we will submit same together with a statement from T-Mobile regarding the lifetime maintenance of the landscaping. Have a great weekend! Yours truly, John John ]. Coughlin R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Telephone: (631) 425-4100 Facsimile: (631) 425-4104 E-IVlail: .tc_o_.u_g~h I i n (a~ r r~_~_c I a w. £_.o.__m This e-mail message and attached liles, if any, are confidential and intended solely lbr the use of the addressee(s) nanled above. This communication may contain inl'ormation protected by atlorney-cliem, work product, or other privileges. If you are llot the intemled recipient or his/her agent, any review, use. dissemination, forx,,arding. printing, copying, or other distribution olthe information in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. II'you have received this confidential conmtunication in error, please notil? the sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message. From: Lanza, Heather [mailto:heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 3:58 PM To: John Coughlin Cc: Winser, Kristy Subject: RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed John, I look forward to hearing back soon. 3 Heather From: John Coughlin [mailto:jcoughlJn@rnhdaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:59 AN To: Lanza, Heather Cc: Winser, Kristy Subject: RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed Heather, Thank you ~ I will forward your e-mail to T-Mobile and get back to you as soon as have a response. Also, as to the T-Mobile facility at the LIPA property (SCTM 45-1-14.1), T-Mobile is moving forward in good-faith on that site. Presently, the Building Permit Application is being revised and supplemented to address the most recent Code amendments from July (including the priority analysis and landscaping). We expect that this revised BP Application will be submitted within the next 10 days-2 weeks. Yours truly, John John J. Coughlin R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Telephone: (631) 425-4100 Facsimile: (631) 425-4104 E-Mail: icouclhlin@rnhclaw.com This e-mail message and attached files, if any, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) ilallled above, l'his communication may COl/taill intbrmation protected by attorney-client, work producL or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or his/her agent, any review, use, dissemination, tbrwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of the inlbrmation in this c-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please nolil~ thc sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete thc original message. From: Lanza, Heather [mailto:heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:28 PM To: 3ohn Coughlin Cc: Winser, Kristy Subject: East Marion FD colocation info needed August 24, 2010 John, I am hoping to get my report down to the Building Department late this week or early next. I need some information from you, though, prior to my being able to finish it, and if you can get it to me quickly, we should have this application in for a building permit shortly. In preparing t~lanning Director's report to the Building~ector to establish that the requirements are met by your application allowing this to be constructed with only a Building Permit, I noticed the landscaping shown on Sheet Number Z-2 dated 4/9/10, does not comply with the requirements. The entire equipment area must be entirely screened from view from all vantage points, including the existing equipment area. It should be a simple thing to run that double row of cedars around the entire perimeter (all the way around since the code says "from every vantage point.") You also must screen the gates (screening set far enough away so they can get into the gates). Please submit a new landscape plan showing this or something similar that accomplishes the code requirement. You can e-mail a draft landscape plan to me to save time on the back and forth. I would also request a note on the landscape plan asserting that the carrier will maintain that screening for the life of the facility, and an affidavit signed by your client to that effect for our file would also be helpful. A C&R on the property for this seems unnecessary. Who owns the pole? If there is some chance of a third or fourth carrier, perhaps they would work with your client to expand the planting area to include a larger area so that the next carrier doesn't have to disturb the existing plantings after this second one is done and the equipment area can be kept as compact as possible. Absent that cooperation, screening the existing area and the proposed area will suffice to meet the code requirement. The status of the T-mobile facility at SCTM 45-1-14.1 remains unpermitted. It puts us in an awkward position on all the T-mobile applications since our code essentially doesn't allow us to approve applications where there is a facility that isn't permitted operating in the Town. The last we heard you had submitted an application to the Building Department in June, and nothing has happened since. Submitting the necessary applications to Planning and the Zoning Board on the unpermitted facility would indicate to us a sincere attempt to acquire the necessary permits for this facility. It seems you need some variances from ZBA, and Planning Board site plan and special exception approvals. These applications should all be run concurrently so that they may be processed as efficiently as possible. With the submission of the applications to Planning and Zoning Boards, l can then report that this facility is on its way to being permitted and we can proceed with new T Mobile facilities. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza~town.southold.ny.us Lanza, Heather From: Sent: -To: Cc: Subject: John Coughlin [jcoughlin@rnhclaw.com] Friday, August 27, 2010 4:49 PM Lanza, Heather Winser, Kristy; Marisa Knoth RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed Heather, Yhe current note provides "Carriers will maintain screening for the life of the facility (towards the bottom/left). If acceptable, I will have T-Mobile finalize the prints and get them out to you asap. As to the BP issuance on this site being conditioned on the filing of the revised BPA on the LIPA site - I think that is acceptable. Yours truly, John John J. Coughlin R~, NieLsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Telephone: (631) 425-4100 Facsimile: (631) 425-4104 E-Hail: .Lc_qu g h I i n @ r n h c£a__w.., c.o_..m_. This e-mail message and attached files, if any, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain infimnation protected by attorney~client, work product, or other privileges, l[you are not the intended recipient or his/her agent, any review, use, dissemination, fiwwarding, printing, cop3 rog, or other distribution of the information in this emlail is strictly prohibited, lfyoa have received this confidential communication in en'or~ please notil? the sender immediately by ~cpJy c-mail message and permanently delete the original message. From: Lanza, Heather [mailto:heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us]' · ent: Friday, August 27, 2010 4:36 PM To: John Coughlin Cc: Winser, Kristy; Marisa Knoth Subject: RE: East Harion FD colocation info needed John, That is some great landscaping plan. It looks like it does the trick. I'll get the consultant's report on Monday on the few technical aspects, and get my report down to the Building Department by Tuesday next week. Could you put the statement of landscape care right on the landscape plan itself (if it isn't already there?). Five copies of the plan should be enough. I thought that perhaps I could do a condition on the report that you meet all the requirements to get the Building Permit for the East Marion site once you have submitted the revised application on the LIPA location to the Building Department. The rationale to allow us to mov~ward on the building permit despite this I~rmitted that the East Marion location is id~al because it will not be visible. Does that so~nd fair? Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza~town.southold.ny.us location still outstanding will be From: John Coughlin [mailto:jcoughlin@rnhclaw.com] Sent-' Friday, August 27, 2010 4:20 PN To: Lanza, Heather Cc: Winser, Kristy; Marisa Knoth Subject: RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed Heather, Attached hereto is a pdf of the proposed additional landscaping, which shows such landscaping around all existing and proposed equipment. If acceptable, please let me know how many hard copies you require and we will submit same together with a statement from T-Mobile regarding the lifetime maintenance of the landscaping. Have a great weekend! Yours truly, John John J. Coughtin R6, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Telephone: (631) 425-4100 Facsimile: (631) 425-4104 E-Maih jcoug hlin¢)rn hclaw.com [his e-mail message and attached files, if any. are confidential and intended solely tbr the use of the addressee(s) named above, l'his communication may contain illl~n'fnatio~l prolecled by atlorney-client, work producL or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or his/l~c~ agem, any review, usc, dissemillation, tbrwarding, prinling, copying, or olhcr distribution of the inlbrmation in this c-mail is sn'icll> prohibited If you have received this confidential communication error, please nolit~ the sender immcdialcly by rcpl> omail mossago and permanently deltic the original message. 2 From: Lanza, Heather [mailto:heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us] ~ent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 3:58 PM To: .lohn Coughlin Cc: Winser, Kristy Subject: RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed John, I look forward to hearing back soon. Heather From: .John Coughlin [mailto:jcoughlin@rnhclaw.com] ~ent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:59 AM To: Lanza, Heather Cc: Winser, Kristy Subje~: RE: East Marion FD colocation info needed Heather, Thank you - I will forward your e-mail to T-Mobile and get back to you as soon as I have a response. Also, as to the T-Mobile facility at the LIPA property (SCTM 45-1-14.1), T-Mobile is moving forward in good-faith on that site. Presently, the Building Permit Application is being revised and supplemented to address the most recent Code amendments from July (including the priority analysis and landscaping). We expect that this revised BP Application will be submitted within the next 10 days-2 weeks. Yours truly, John John J. Coughlin R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP :36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 Telephone: (631) 425-4].00 Facsimile: (631) 425-4104 E-Marl: j co u g_h I i n~_r.D.[!.~[~3....W_,.~gm This e-mail message a.d amtd~ed files, dan:,, arc confidential and intended solely lbr the usc of the addressee(s) nan]ed above. ['his communicaJion may conhfin information protected by attorne)-cJient, work product, or other privileges. If you arc nol lh~' imcndcd recipient or his/her agent, nny review, use, dissemination, lbrwarding, printing, copying, or othc~ di~lrihulion olthe inlbrmation in this e-mail is slrictly prohibited. If you have received this confidential communication in crror~ please notil~ 6~c sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanemly delete thc ori~,,in fl mcssaL~' From: Lanza, Heather [mailto:heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us] ~ent; Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:28 PM To: .lohn Coughlin 3 Winser, East Marion FD colocation info needed August24,2010 John, I am hoping to get my report down to the Building Department late this week or early next. 1 need some information from you, though, prior to my being able to finish it, and if you can get it to me quickly, we should have this application in for a building permit shortly. In preparing the Planning Director's report to the Building Inspector to establish that the requirements are met by your application allowing this to be constructed with only a Building Permit, I noticed the landscaping shown on Sheet Number Z-2 dated 4/9/10, does not comply with the requirements. The entire equipment area must be entirely screened from view from all vantage points, including the existing equipment area. It should be a simple thing to run that double row of cedars around the entire perimeter (all the way around since the code says "from every vantage point.") You also must screen the gates (screening set far enough away so they can get into the gates). Please submit a new landscape plan showing this or something similar that accomplishes the code requirement. You can e-mail a draft landscape plan to me to save time on the back and forth. I would also request a note on the landscape plan asserting that the carrier will maintain that screening for the life of the facility, and an affidavit signed by your client to that effect for our file would also be helpful. A C&R on the property for this seems unnecessary. Who owns the pole? If there is some chance of a third or fourth carrier, perhaps they would work with your client to expand the planting area to include a larger area so that the next carder doesn't have to disturb the existing plantings after this second one is done and the equipment area can be kept as compact as possible. Absent that cooperation, screening the existing area and the proposed area will suffice to meet the code requirement. The status of the T-mobile facility at SCTM 45-1-14.1 remains unpermitted. It puts us in an awkward position on all the T-mobile applications since our code essentially doesn't allow us to approve applications where there is a facility that isn't permitted operating in the Town. The last we heard you had submitted an application to the Building Department in June, and nothing has happened since. Submitting the necessary applications to Planning and the Zoning Board on the unpermitted facility would indicate to us a sincere attempt to acquire the necessary permits for this facility. It seems you need some variances from ZBA, and Planning Board site plan and special exception approvals. These applications should all be run concurrently so that they may be processed as efficiently as possible. With the submission of the applications to Planning and Zoning Boards, 1 can then report that this facility is on its way to being permitted and we can proceed with new T Mobile facilities. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza@town.southold.ny.us 4 Lanza, Heather From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Lanza, Heather Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:28 PM 'John Coughlin' Winser, Kristy East Marion FD colocation info needed August24,2010 John, 1 am hoping to get my report down to the Building Department late this week or early next. I need some information from you, though, prior to my being able to finish it, and if you cau get it to me quickly, we should have this application in for a building permit shortly. In preparing the Planning Director's report to the Building Inspector to establish that the requirements am met by your application allowing this to be constructed with only a Building Permit, 1 noticed the landscaping shown on Sheet Number Z-2 dated 4/9/I 0, does not comply with the requirements. The entire equipment area must be entirely screened from view from all vantage points, including the existing equipment area. It should be a simple thing to run that double row of cedars around the entire perimeter (all the way around since the code says "from every vantage point.") You also must screen the gates (screening set far enough away so they can get into the gates). Please submit a new landscape plan showing this or something similar that accomplishes the code requirement. You can e-mail a draft landscape plan to me to save time on the back and forth. I would also request a note on the landscape plan asserting that the carrier will maintain that screening for the life of the facility, and an affidavit signed by 5our client to that effect for our file would also be helpful. A C&R on the property for this seems unnecessary. Who owns the pole? If there is some chance ora third or fourth carrier, perhaps they would work with your client to expand the planting area to include a larger area so that the next carrier doesn't have to disturb the existing plantings after this second one is done and the equipment area can be kept as compact as possible. Absent that cooperation, screening the existing area and the proposed area will suffice to meet the code requirement. The status of the T-mobile facility at SCYM 45-1-14.1 remains unpennitted. It puts us in an awkward position on all the T-mobile applications since our code essentially doesn't allow us to approve applications where thero is a facility that isn't permitted operating in the Town. The last we heard you had submitted an application to the Building Department in June, and nothing has happened since. Submitting the necessary applications to Planning and the Zoning Board on the unpermitted facility would indicate to us a sincere attempt to acquire the necessary permits for this facility. It seems you need some variances from ZBA, and Planning Board site plan and special exception approvals. These applications should all be run concurrently so that they may be processed as efficiently as possible. With the sub~nission of the applications to Planning and Zoning Boards, I can then report that this facility is on its way to being permitted and we can proceed with new T Mobile facilities. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197 Phone: (631)765-1938 NIELSEN, HUBER 8( COUGHLIN, L!.P ATTORNEYS AT LAW No~x~ N~ Yoa~ HUNTINOTON, NEW YO~ 1174~ TBLEPHONB: (~1) ~5-~100 F~osmx~s: (6~1) 4~5-4104 August 9, 2010 By Hand Mr. Michael Verity Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: T-Mobile Northeast LLC Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York SCTM#: 1000 -31 - 3 - 11.31 Dear Mr. Verity: We represent T-Mobile Northeast LLC ('T-Mobile') with regard to its application to colocate at the existing public utility wireless telecommunications facility at the subject property. T-Mobile's proposal includes the interior installation of its antennas within the existing pole and the installation of equipment on the ground surrounded by a double row of evergreen plantings. T-Mobile filed its original Building Permit Application with your office on September 11, 2009 and supplemented it on October 1, 2009. A Notice of Disapproval was issued thereafter on October 15, 2009. On November 18, 2009, our office submitted revised documentation with your office and requested that the Building Department reconsider the application as T-Mobile modified its design so as to comply with the provisions requiring Building Permit only. On December 15, 2010, the attached correspondence of the Town Attorney's office was issued along with a second Notice of Disapproval, requiring Planning Board site plan and special exception approval per Section 280-71 of the Town Code (copies of said documents attached hereto). On April 28, 2010, our office filed the Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Applications with the Town of Southold Planning Board. However, in furtherance of the enactment of Local Law No. 4 of 2010 and the amendments made therein to Town Code Article XVII addressing the zoning of "Wireless Communications Facilities," we believe that T-Mobile's proposed facility complies with the amended provisions set forth in Code Sections 280- 71A(2)(b), 280-71A(2)(a)[2], and 280-70, requiring Building Permit only. Specifically, as shown in the Construction Drawings, prepared by Bay State Design and dated November 12, 2009, which are currently on file with your office, T-Mobile proposes: T-Mobile Northeast LLC Building Permit Application - East Marion F.D. August 9, 2010 Page 2 of 2 · To install antennas and cables within an existing monopole, i.e. the proposal will cause no visual change as "the antennas are interior-mounted in the existing structure and are not visible from the outside after installation," in accord with Section 280-71A(2)(b)[1 ]; · To install base station equipment that will be [e]ntirely screened from view with dense evergreeen planting so that all equipment, shelters, fences, gates and other associated structures are not visible from any vantage point" and the "[p]lantings will be of sufficient size to achieve this screening effect immediately upon planting" in accord with Sections 280-71A(2)(b)[2] and 280- 71A(2)(a)[2]; and · Furthermore, as stated in the enclosed updated Noise Analysis, the noise from all proposed base equipment will measure less than 45dB at all adjacent property lines in accord with 280- 71A(2)(b)[2] and 280-71A(2)(a)[2][d]. To further comply with the amended Town Code, we submit herewith the following supplemental documents: 1. Two (2) counterparts of updated Noise Analysis correspondence of Bay State Design, dated July 28, 2010, pursuant to amended Code Sections 280-70J(5), 280-71A(2)(b)[2], and 280- 71A(2)(a)[2][d]; 2. Memorandum regarding Priority Site Locations and accompanying Affidavit of Pawan Madahar, pursuant to amended Code Section 280-70D2; 3. Affidavit of Applicant regarding the decommissioning of the unpermitted T-Mobile facility at SCTM# 1000-74-2-23, as referenced in the attached December 15, 2009 correspondence of the Town Attorney's office; and 4. Copy of our June 17, 2010 filing correspondence to the Building Department, date-stamped by the Building Department, relating to the application submission and pending compliance of the existing T-Mobile facility at SCTM# 1000-45-1-14.1 (f/k/a Lot 11), as referenced in the attached December 15, 2009 correspondence of the Town Attorney's office. Please note that copies of all other Building Permit Application filing requirements are on file with your office. Should you require any additional copies or further information, please advise. We respectfully request that the instant proposal be processed as Building Permit only and that a Building Permit be issued at this time. We respectfully request that our office be contacted when the Building Permit is ready to be picked up. We can be reached at (631) 425-4100. Very truly yours, R~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP (~_ 'J~hn)Uoug~in) JC:mk Enclosures Cc w/o encls.: Mr. Martin Finnegan, Town Attorney & Ms. Jennifer Andaloro, Assistant Town Attorney Ms. Heather Lanza, Planning Director NIELSEN, HUBER & GOUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEw Yom~ AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NI~w Yo~.~ 11743 July 16, 2010 TELEPHONE: (6~1) '$25-4100 FAGSI~ILE: (031) 425-'$104 VIA UPS and E-Mail Ms. Heather Lanza, Director of Planning Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 JUL 9 2010 RE: T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile) HOLD Escrow Fee for Consultant review of Site Plan Application and Special Exception Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York SCTM#: 1000- 31 3- 11.31 Dear Ms. Lanza: On July 13, 2010 we forwarded to your office correspondence regarding the escrow fee for the consultant's review of the subject matter along with T-Mobile Check No. 1790841 in the sum of $8,500.00. However, we just learned that on July 13, 2010, the Town Board enacted Local Law No. 4 of 2010, which law amends Chapter 280 of the Town Code regarding Wireless Communictation Facilities. Accordingly, we are requesting that you hold T-Mobile's check in your file until we have had an opportunity to review the Code amendment and its implications on the review process for the subject application. Please do not deposit the check into the escrow account at this time and do not have your consultant begin his review of this application until you have received further direction from our office. If you have already directed the consultant to commence review of this matter, please ask that he halt his review at this time and await further direction from our office. Thank you. Very truly' yours, RI~, NIELSEN,,~BER & COUGHLIN, LLP 7 ~-'~/ L~.wrence C. R~ Cc via email: Kristy Winser HUBER & GOUGm,F T, 1.T.P ATTOILN'I~Y$ A.T LAW H~gZNo'~'o~, NBW ¥o~ 11748 July 16, 2010 TBL~On: (681) 4'~5-4100 PA~rT,'U: (501) 405'4104 VIA UPS and E-Mail Ms. Heather Lanza, Director of Plmming Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RB: T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile) HOLD Escrow Fee for Consultant review of Site Plan Apptl~hflbn and Special Exception Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Faeility at: Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, Bast Marion, New York SCTM#: 1000 - 31 - 3 - 11.31 Dear Ms. Lanza: On July 13, 2010 wc forwarded to your office correspondence regarding the escrow fee for the consultant's review of the subject matter along with T-Mobile Check No. 1790841 in the sum o£ $8,500.00. However, we just learned that on July 13, 2010, the Town Board enacted Local Law No. 4 of 2010, which law amends Chapter 280 of the Town Code regarding Wireless Communictation Facilities. Accordingly, we are requesting that you bold T-Mobile's check in your file until we have had an opportunity to review the Code m*nendment and its implications on the review process for the subject application. Please do not deposit the check into the escrow account at this time and do not have your consultant begin bis review of this application until you have received further direction from our office. If you have already directed the consultant to commence review of this matter, please ask that he halt his review at this time and await further direction from our office. Very truly yours, Cc via cmail: Kristy Winser Page 1 of 1 Kalin, Carol From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:31 AM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: FW: T-Mobile Northeast LLC at East Marion Fire District, 9245 Main Road, East Marion Importance: High Attachments: 13-345 East Marion F.D. Hold Escrow fee Itr to H. Lanza 071610.pdf Please print e-mail and the attachment for the file. I responded to Mr. Re to let him know I would ask Mr. Comi to halt his review, at their request, of the above application until they let me know they wanted to proceed, but that we already deposited the check. From: Marisa Knoth [mailto:mknoth@rnhclaw.com] Sent-' Friday, July 16, 2010 11:18 AH To: Lanza, Heather Cc: Winser, Kristy; Lawrence Re; John Coughlin Subject-' Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC at East Harion Fire District, 9245 Hain Read, East Marion Importance: High MS. Lanza, With regard to the subject matter, please see our attached correspondence regarding the hold on the escrow fee check submitted to your office earlier this week. Thank you. Marisa Knoth Rl~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 (631) 425-4100 (telephone) (631 ) 425-4104 (facsimile) mknoth(~)rnhclaw.com This e-mail message and attached files, if any, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain information protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or his/her agent, any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of the information in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message. 7/16/2010 Rt , NIELSEN, HUBER & GOUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW O0 No~'r~ N~w Yo~ HUNTXNOTON, N~W YO]~ 11743 July 13, 2010 VIA UPS TELEPHON~: (O01) 425-4100 FAOSI~4ILB: (OOl) 425-4104 Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 JUL RE: T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile) Escrow Fee for Consultant review of Site Plan Application and Special Exception Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York SCTM#: 1000-31 3-11.31 Dear Ms. Winser: Pursuant to the request of Chair Martin H. Sidor and §280-74 of Southold Town Code, enclosed herewith is T-Mobile Check No. 1790841, payable to the Town of Southold (NY), in the sum of $8,500.00, representing the amount to be held in escrow for the technical consultant review fee. For the reasons set forth herein, this payment is made under protest. T-Mobile does not contest that the Town has the authority, pursuant to its Code, to request that the applicant pay for fees for technical experts that are reasonable and that are reasonably necessary for the review of complex technical data that is beyond the ability of the Town to review. Indeed, in Mo,/v Board of Town Trustees, 61 A.D. 3d 763 (2d Dept.2009), the Court stated: Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the Board of Town Trustees of the Town of Southold (hereinafter the Board) acted within its discretion in hiring an outside consultant and requiring the petitioners to pay the consultant's fee. Under Town of Southold Code § 275-7 (D), the Board has the discretion to hire an outside consultant and require the applicant to pay the consultant's fee when the Board determines that the "complexity of the activity, the difficulty in determining the threat to the resource areas or the size of the request or project involves and requires more information and analysis than can reasonably be supplied to the Board without independent technical professional assistance." Here, not only did the Board state at a public hearing that the application was complicated, but the petitioners' expert acknowledged that the proposal presented "a difficult application" for the Board. Town of Southold Planning T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Application July 13, 2010 Page 2 of 2 The application now pending before the Board is to simply collocate in the existing East Marion Fire Department flagpole monopole. In contrast to Mo¥, the affixing of small panel antennas within the existing flagpole monopole and the installation of equipment cabinets adjacent to the existing equipment area, is not a "difficult application" that would require the assistance of a technical expert. It is well established that in order for a Town to properly assess fees incurred in connection with the reviewing of a zoning application upon an applicant, such fees must be both reasonable and necessary and not incurred for the convenience of the Board. See Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue v Village of Roslyn Harbor, 40 N.Y. 2d 158 (1976). Therefore, T- Mobile ~vill not consent to any billing by the consultant for services that are not technical in nature and that should be performed by the Town's staff, which is well qualified to perform planning and engineering functions such as review of landscaping, aesthetic issues, building code compliance and the like. Moreover, for those services that are truly of a technical nature, T- Mobile will not consent to the payment of fees if the consultant does not possess the requisite technical qualifications to perform such services. T-Mobile requests that you provide us with the consultant's scope of work for this site and the name of the person in the Town to whom he reports. In addition, we request that we be provided with the consultant's detailed invoice statements for our review. Thank you. Very truly yours, RI~, N~ELSEN, HU~ & COUGHLIN, LLP By: ~-"~'~-~-- ~'~-"~"~ Lawrence C. R~ Enclosure RP , NIELSEN, HUBER 8,: COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 80 NoaT~i NEw Yom~ AVENUE HUNTIlqOTON, NEW YOIL~ 11743 TELEPHONE: (031) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (O81) 425-4104 June 28, 2010 BY HAND Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 JUN 2 9 2)10 Sottnold Town Pia::r n~: Boera RE: T-Mobile Northeast LLC Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York SCTM#: 1000 -31 - 3 - 11.31 Dear Ms. Winser: As you know, we are the attorneys for T-Mobile Northeast LLC ('T-Mobile' hereafter), with respect to the captioned application, which was filed with your office on April 28, 2010. We enclose herewith the following documents to supplement our application submission: 1. Two (2) signed and sealed copies of correspondence of Bay State Design, Inc., dated June 23, 2010, regarding Grading & Drainage information; and 2. T~vo (2) sets of signed and sealed Construction Drawings representing "Architectural Review Materials," prepared by Bay State Design, Inc., dated November 12, 2009 (Please note these drawings are on file with the Building Department as well). Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, R~, NIELSEN, HUJJ.ER & COUGHLIN, LLP By:~.. ~C.R~ LCR/mk Enclosures BAY STATE DESIGN June 23, 2010 Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ T-Mobile Northeast LLC (Site 13-345) Grading/Drainage of Subject Property Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY Dear Mr. Sidor: T-Mobile is proposing a wireless facility at the above address. As shown in the construction drawings and zoning drawings, dated 11/12/09 and 4/9/10, respectively, the proposed installation calls for the mounting of equipment cabinets on an 8 ftx 22 ft concrete pad. The premises are already improved with existing buildings, parking area, monopole, and equipment area and the premises are relatively evenly graded. This minor increase in impervious area should not affect the drainage of this site. The installation will not change the drainage patterns or flow paths and run off will continue in the same manner and direction as it does presently. As such, drainage calculations and grading plans are not warranted by this proposal. Sincerely yours, Kenny Wang, P.E. Ba5 State Design. Inc, 241 Boston Post Road West Marlborough. MA (}1752 Tel. (5081 229-4100 J;ax (508) 485-5321 ~ ~ .Bah StateDesign.cmn BAY STATE DESIGN June 23, 2010 Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ T-Mobile Northeast LLC (Site 13-345) Grading/Drainage of Subject Property Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY Dear Mr. Sidor: T-Mobile is proposing a wireless facility at the above address. As shown in the construction drawings and zoning drawings, dated 11/12/09 and 4/9/10, respectively, the proposed installation calls for the mounting of equipment cabinets on an 8 ft x 22 ft concrete pad. The premises are already improved with existing buildings, parking area, monopole, and equipment area and the premises are relatively evenly graded. This minor increase in impervious area should not affect the drainage of this site. The installation will not change the drainage patterns or flow paths and run off will continue in the same manner and direction as it does presently. As such, drainage calculations and grading plans are not warranted by this proposal. Sincerely yours, Kenny Wang, P.E. Bay State Design. Inc. 241 Boston Post P, oad West Marlborongh. MA 01752 'Fei. [508) 229-4 I{}(} Fax (508) 485-5321 w~,~,~,~,.Ba5 StaleDesign.com AGREEMENT This agreement made and entered into this ,~ I day of ~ 2010 by and between RICHARD A. COMI d/b/a THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS (herein after~[r,~ferred to as Consultant) (mailing address: 70 Cambridge Drive, Glenmont, New York 12077) party of the first part, and THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NY 11971 (hereinafter referred to as Client) (mailing address; Town Hail Annex 54375 SR 25 Southold, NY 11971) party of the second part. Consultant and Client, for the consideration named, hereby agree as follows: PURPOSE Client hereby retains Consultant for the purpose of assisting, advising and representing the Client on matters relating to reviewing and analyzing a wireless application for T-Mobile for a proposed facility at 9425 NYS Rt. 25, East Marion, received by client for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. 2. SPECIFIC SERVICES: SERVICES DURING PROCESSING OF THE APPLICATION The Consultant shall furnish appropriate Wireless Telecommunications Facilities siting assistance and advice to the Client and Client officials involved in the processing of the T-Mobile application for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, and, in connection therewith, shall: a) review the application filed with the Client for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, b) assist and advise the Client in the analysis of the application, to include attending meetings with the Applicants and/or Client officials as required, c) recommend in wdting to the Client whether the application should be approved or disapproved, and set forth in writing the reasons for such approval or disapproval, d) inspect the construction of the facility and in wdting recommend when/if the certificate of compliance should be issued. TIMES AND A~¥ENDANCE: COOPERATION BY CLIENT Consultant shall perform the services described heroin in as expeditious a manner as is reasonably possible and with due consideration of the time requirements of Client. Client rocognizes that the timing of the performance of Consultant's services may be affected by previous commitments to other clients (including the delivery of promised services and work product and previously scheduled meetings), and situations normally and traditionally deemed to be matters of a force majeure naturo, including those influenced by the weather, strikes, or power outages. Client agrees to cooperate with Consultant, as needed, and to provide Consultant with copies of any records, documents and other information needed for the fulfillment of this agreement on a timely basis. Client further agrees to provide Consultant with access to apprepdate of~cials and/or employees of Client, as may be needed in the fulfillment of the agreement. Moreover, both parties understand and agroe that mutual accountability and responsiveness is cdtical to the successful completion of the project, and therefore both shall always make their best faith efforts to be accountable and promptly responsive to each other. COMPENSATION In payment for the services to be performed hereunder by Consultant, Client shall make payments to the Consultant as follows: A) The Client shall pay Consultant its normal published houdy rate (which at the date of this agreement is $250.00 per hour) for each hour of time devoted by Consultant to the performance of such services, provided, however, that for time traveling by Consultant in conjunction with the performance of such services, the Client shall pay Consultant 50% of the Consultants normal published rate. It is understood that the costs for all services, including expenses as coverod below, will not exceed $8,500.00 for the primary carrier on the new facility, without additional approval from the Client. B) Consultant shall invoice the Client regularly, but no less frequently than monthly, after services have been performed, for any compensation payable. Such invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt, but in no case later than thirty (30) days. C) In the event that the Client disputes or objects to any portion of any invoice submitted by Consultant pursuant to this agreement, Client shall, within fifteen (15) days of the receipt of such invoice, notif~ Consultant in wdting of such dispute or objection. D) Payments made by the Client more than thirty (30) days following the date of submission of an invoice shall incur a charge of one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) of the amount thereby deemed late, compounded monthly, until the amount due and owing by the Client is paid in full. 5. REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES For services performed hereunder, Client shall reimburse Consultant, for out-of-pocket expenses for the following items: (a) Travel-related costs such as airfare, car rental, night lodging accommodations and meals consumed while on-site or enroute; (b) Expedited or overnight delivery service; (c) Any other reasonably necessary expenses directly related and attributable to the fulfillment of this agreement. Consultant's requests for expense reimbursement shall be included in Consultant's invoice at actual cost, with no markup. STATUS OF CONSULTANT Consultant and Client agree that in the performance of Consultant's services hereunder, Consultant shall not be deemed to be an employee of Client for any purpose whatsoever, nor act under Color of State. NOTICES Any and all notices, invoices, and payments required hereunder shall be addressed to the parties at their respective addresses set forth in page 1 hereof, or to such other address as may hereafter be designated in writing by either party hereto. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT This agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the Laws of the State of New York. COMPLETE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION There are no terms, conditions or obligations other than those contained herein, and there are no wdtten or verbal statements or representations, warranties or agreements with respect to this Agreement that have not been embodied herein. This agreement constitutes the complete understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No modification or amendment of any provisions of this agreement shall be valid unless in wdting and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Consultant and Client by individuals duly authorized to do so, have signed this agreement, the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT By: ,~J~.(~wZ (electronic signature) R.A.Comi The Center for Municipal Solutions CLIENT By: ~ Title: (pdnted) 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fam 631 765-3136 May 17, 2010 Ms. Denise S. Benun 16 Drake Lane Manhasset, NY 11030 Re: Proposed Site Plan for T-Mobile NE, LLC at East Marion Fire Dept. Located at 9425 NYS Rt. 25, East Marion SCTM# 1000-31-3 - 11.31 Zoning District: R-40 Dear Ms. Benun: Enclosed herewith please find an application package and CD regarding the above- referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Kristy Win~s Senior Planner Encls. cc: Richard Comi (cover letter) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN II. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPII L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M~II.ING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 17, 2010 Mr. Richard A. Comi 70 Cambridge Drive Glenmont, NY 12077 Re: Proposed Site Plan for T-Mobile NE, LLC at East Marion Fire Dept. Located at 9425 NYS Rt. 25, East Marion SCTM# 1000-31-3-11.31 Zoning District: R-40 Dear Mr. Comi: Enclosed herewith please find an application package and CD regarding the above- referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND May 14, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP Att: Larry Re' 36 North New York Avenue Huntington NY 11743 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re~ T-mobile Northeast LLC, at East Marion Fire District Located at 9245 Main Road SCTM# 1000-31-3 - 11.31 Dear Mr. Re': I am writing in response to your submission received April 28, 2010 in connection with the above referenced application. The Planning Department is currently reviewing the application for completeness for review to begin. As mentioned above, in order for the application to be deemed "complete" and ready for review and analysis to commence, the Town of Southold will require payment in the amount of $8,500 made payable to the Town of Southold to be placed into an escrow account to cover the cost of the technical consultant's review. The technical consultant's review fee is required by Southold Town Code §280-74A(d). Any unused portion of the technical consultant's fee will be returned to you. Once the above referenced and required fee has been received and the application is deemed complete for initial review purposes, formal review of this application will begin by the Planning staff, the technical consultant, the Southold Town Planning Board, and all other interested and involved Southold Town Departments and outside Departments and Agencies. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment and we look forward to the continued review of this application. Sincerely, Martin H. Sidor Cc: Southold Town Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Kaisty Winser, Senior Planner R]~, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT L~W ~0 NOHTH NEW Yo~ I{UlVTINOTON, NEW YO~X 11743 TI~LI~PHONE: (6~1) 425-4100 FAOSII~ILE: (6/31) 425-4104 April 28, 2010 BY HAND Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board To;vn Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: T-Mobile Northeast LLC Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York SCTM#: 1000-31 -3 11.31 Dear Ms. Winser: On behalf of T-Mobile Northeast LLC ('T-Mobile' hereafter), submitted herewith are the captioned Applications as follows: With respect to the Site Plan Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application; 2. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Affidavit; 3. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Transactional Disclosure Form; 4. Original and one (1) copy of Owner's Transactional Disclosure Form; 5. Original and one (1) copy of Owner's Authorization Affidavit; 6. Original and one (1) copy of Environmental Assessment Form, prepared by VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C., dated Mamh 19, 2010, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(3); 7. Original and one (1) copy of LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, prepared by VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C.; 8. T-Mobile Check No. 1640471 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the fee for modification, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(2)(a); 9. Seven (7) counterparts of Radiofrequency - Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Town of Southold Planning"/goard T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Application April 28, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Compliance Report, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated October 15, 2009, demonstrating the project's compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations and providing information on the other carders already located on the facility in accordance with Town Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(6), 280-74B(1)(a) and 280-70J (Please note that the drawings attached to this version of the report reflect the original equipment design. The proposed design changes have no impact on the results of the Compliance ReporO ; 10. Seven (7) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report prepared by GPD Associates, dated May 15, 2009, in accordance with Town Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(6), and 280-74B(1)(b) 11. Seven (7) counterparts of T-Mobile's FCC Licenses pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(c) (Note: Copies of two additional FCC licenses are included in this filing that were not included in the original Building Permit application submission); 12. Seven (7) counterparts of FAA 2C Survey and Airspace Analysis, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1 ), and 280-74B(1 ); 13. Seven (7) copies of Gap and Propagation Maps, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74B(1)(d) and (e); 14. Seven (7) copies of Search Ring Map, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280- 74B(1)(e); 15. Seven (7) copies of Affidavit of Radiofrequency Engineer, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1 ) and 280-74B(1 )(e); 16. Seven (7) copies of Deed, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(g); 17. Seven (7) copies of the following License/Lease Agreements, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(g): a. Memorandum of Lease between East Marion Fire District and T-Mobile Northeast LLC, dated August 19, 2009; b. Site License Agreement, between New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and T- Mobile Northeast LLC, dated October 22, 2009; c. Second Amendment to Option and Lease Agreement between East Marion Fire District and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, dated March 3, 2008; d. First Amendment to Option and Lease Agreement between East Marion Fire District and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, dated December 7, 2006; e. Option and Lease Agreement between East Marion Fire District and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, dated August 17, 2005; 18. Noise Analysis correspondence of Bay State Design, dated November 3, 2009, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-701(5) 280-71A(2)(a)(ii)(4); 19. Two (2) counterparts of TOWA1R Determination Results, Public Airport Analysis, and FAA Notice Criteria Tool printout, addressing Town Code Section 280-74C(2); 20. Two (2) counterparts of Visual Analysis, prepared by Bay State Design, Inc., dated December 2009, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(3) and 280-74C(8); 21. Two (2) counterparts of Vicinity Plan, prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C., revision dated April 5, 2010, addressing Town Code Sections 280-74C(4), and 280-74C(9); 22. Nine (9) sets of Zoning Drawings, including Site Plan and Elevation Drawings, prepared Town of Southold Plannin T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Application April 28, 2010 Page 3 of 3 by Bay State Design, dated April 9, 2010, addressing Town Code Sections 280-74C(5), 280-74C(10), 280-74C(11), 280-74C(12), 280-74C(13) and 280-133A(4). The Zoning Drawings contain a compound landscape plan, in accordance with the requirements of Code Sections 280-70M, 280-71A(2)(b)[2] and 280-71A(2)(a)[2][c]; 23. One (1) CD Rom containing digital files of propagation and search ring maps, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(7) and §280-74B(1)(f); and 24. Four (4) copies of Property Survey, prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C., dated November 5, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(5). With regard to the Special Exception Permit Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Wireless Facility Special Exception Application; 2. T-Mobile Check No. 1640472 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the Special Exception Application fee, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(3); 3. Two (2) copies of Building Department Notice of Disapproval, dated December 15, 2009, and Building Permit Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(1)(a); 4. Two (2) copies of Site Plan Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(l)(b); and 5. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Todd Padreza regarding future co-location, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(2). In addition, our office received correspondence, dated December 15, 2009, of Jennifer Andaloro, Assistant Town Attorney regarding the subject proposal (copy attached hereto). Ms. Andaloro notes that the Planning Board would be unable to issue approval for the subject site until such time as two unpermitted T-Mobile facilities in the Town of Southold are brought into compliance. It is our understanding that the facility located on SCTM# 1000-74-2-23 is in the process of being decommissioned. A pre-application conference has taken place for the other facility located on SCTM# 1000-45-1-14.1. Applications and supporting materials are in the process of being prepared for filing with the Town Building Department for that site. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RI~, NIELSEN,/~ER & COUGHLIN, L~.-P~- ~' '/ Lawrence C. R~ LCR/mk Enclosures M~.RTIN D. FINNEGAN TOWN ATTORNEY martin finneganCo}town southo]d ny us JENNIFER ANDALORO ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY j ennifer.andaloro@town.southold.ny.us LORI M. HULSE ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY lori.hulse@town.southold.ny.us SCOTT A. RUSSELL Supervisor Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southald, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1939 Facsimile (631) 765-6639 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 15, 2009 John Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 RE: East Marion Fire District Proposed Wireless Telecommunications Facility SCTM #1000-31-3-11.31 Dear Mr. Coughlin: As a courtesy, the Town of Southold Building Department has reconsidered your application for a building permit under the newly adopted provisions of the Wireless Communications Facilities Code and has issued a second Notice of Disapproval under the newly adopted provisions of the Code. As such, enclosed is a copy of the Notice of Disapproval. The original can be obtained from the Building Department directly at your earliest convenience. In response to your letter dated November 18, 2009, while §280-71 "Required Approvals" does allow certain applications to proceed with only a building permit if the listed requirements are met, this application does not meet all the requirements of §280-71. More specifically, this application is expanding the Base Equipment area beyond ten (10%) percent, which is the threshold noted in §280-71A(2)(b)(ii). It is noted that this section refers back to §280-71 ^(2)(a)(ii)l, which requires that the base station equipment be located within an existing shelter or building, not to be expanded beyond an additional ten percent (10%) of floor area. Since the application does not meet the criteria set forth in 280-71A or 280-71B, the proposal will require a special exception approval, site plan approval and a building permit. .~ohn Coughlin, Esq. December 15, 2009 Page 2 We note also that there are two existing wireless facilities owned by T-Mobile Northeast, LLC located on SCTM #1000-74-2-23 and 1000-45-1-11 (within LIPA right of way) that have not received appropriate approvals from the Town and are in violation of our Code. Pursuant to §280-77, the Planning Board cannot issue any new approvals to T-Mobile Northeast, LLC until these wireless facilities are brought into compliance with the Code or are found by the Planning Board to be eligible for approvals as built. This process can occur concurrently with the application for the new facility at East Marion. Should you require any additional information or have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, J al ro ~Attorney JA/Ik Enclosure cc: Mr. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chair J Ms. Heather Lanza, Planning Director Mr. Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector TO: T Mobile USA, Inc. Maxton Technology 20 W Crescent Avenue Allendale, NJ 07401 TOWN OF SOUTItOLD FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 15, 2009 Please take notice that your application dated November 18, 2009 For pemfit to co-locate a wireless facih2y~_n~d i~tal~ment at Location of property: 9245 Main R~oad_.d~_East Marion N,~y County Tax Map No. 1000 ~ Section 31 Block 3 Lot l 1.31 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed request to co-locate a wireless facility & install new equipment requires Planning Board site plan review & special exception approval per Section 280-71 of the Town Code. Authorized Signature CC: file, Planning Board Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, m , further review by the Southold Town Building Department. ay reqmre PROJECT SCOPING WI Building PLANNING APPLICATIONS Friday December 4, 2009 11:30am Project name: Corazzini asphalt I SCTM#: I 84-1-32.1 Location: 6245 Cox lane, Cutchogue Description: Proposed 2,520 sf addition to an existing 3,150 s.f storage building with office requires site plan approval. Status: New site plan Project Name: T-moblie Northeast, LLC I SCTM# t 31-3-11.31 Location: East Marion F.D. Description: Co-location of antenna and related equipment onto an existing tower Status: Applicant received a Notice of Disapproval 10/15/09 ProJect name: Twin forks Landscaping I SCTM#: I 83-3-8 Location: 8405 cox lane, Cutchogue Description: This site plan application is for a 6,000 sq. ft. addition to an existing 1,26~ building having a total of 7,263 sq.ft, for a storage building for a contractor's yard on a I acre lot in the Light Industrial Zoning District. Status: New site plan Project name: Raphael Vinyards I SCTM#: I 85-3-11.4 &l 1.3 Location: Peconic DesCription: This site plan application is for a new I~uilding to an existing site plan. Status: Amended site plan PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND October 23, 2009 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP Att: John Coughlin 38 North New York Avenue Huntington NY 11743 Re: T-mobile Northeast LLC, at E. Marion Fire District Located at 9245 Main Road SCTM#1000-31-3-11.31 Dear Mr. Coughlin; I'm writing as a follow-up on our telephone conversation and to clarify what approvals are required for the above application. As mentioned to you, based on the amendments made to the Southold Town wireless code, all wireless facilities and modifications thereto shall require a building permit, site plan approval, and special exception approval unless listed as exempt in Sec 280-71 'Required Approvals". A building permit would only be required when the support structure meets the General Requirements in Sec 280-70. In this instance, the existing tower is 110' feet in height and exceeds the max height allowed of 45 feet in a residential zoning district. Furthermore, Sec 280- 71(B) states that a wireless facility is permitted requiring a building permit and site plan approval without the requirement of special exception approval if it again, conforms to Sec 280-70 general requirements, and as referenced above, this proposal does not. Therefore, based on the above reason, your notice of disapproval would still apply and applications for a site plan and a special permit should be made to the Planning Board for consideration. It should be noted, that an amended site plan could be made for this application since there is an existing site plan on file. Last, please read Section 280-74 for the application requirements for the necessary approvals you seek and schedule a pre-submission meeting with the Planning Department for the same. Should you have questions regarding the application requirements, contact me anytime. Thank you. Sincerely, Cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Jennifer Andaloro, Assr. Town Attorney Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector · ..Mobile..- T-MOBILE USA, INC. Maxton Technology 260 W Crescent Avenue Allendale, NJ 07401 Fax: 201.934.1062 October 1, 2009 Town of Southold - Building Department Attn: Vicki Toth (Building Permits Coordinator) 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1802 RE: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility - Collocation on the existing AT&T monopole/flagpole on the property of the East Marion Fire Department Premises: 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY 11939 SBL: Section: 31, Block: 3, Lot: 11.31 Project Title: T-Mobile LI 13 345A (EMFD) Dear Vicki: Pursuant to my cover letter of September l 1, 2009 regarding our initial BP application submittal, and our subsequent telephone conversations, enclosed are the additional documents (stated in code §280-74, paragraph (B) as follow in addition to those required in §144-8 C) needed to complete our BP Application. The documents are as follows: a) Written analysis demonstrating the project complies with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations in accordance with § 280-71H. b) Written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance with local, State and Federal Codes. c) Copies of all applicable FCC licenses, notices of proposed conslxuction or alteration, federal environmental impact statements and other documents verifying compliance with federal, state and local regulations. Also included are 4 "revised" copies of the building planffconstmction drawings that provide the corrected cable sizes as noted on the initial submittal of 9/11/09. Page 2 October 1, 2009 Please continue the review of our BP application for this location. If you require anything further, please contact me. Thank you, Eli Siouffi - 201.953.3475 Maxton T,clmology for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC esiouffi~gmail.com P.S.: Please m ail any correspondeneeto~hefollowingaddress: 39AndoverDrive Wayne, NJ 07470 ACm: Todd Padreza(Maxton TechnologyforT-Mobile) · Proposed Site · Existing Sites In-Building Coverage (-76dBm) Map: Existing In-Building Coverage Site ID: LIt3-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 .MoNle- Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30/2010 Proposed Site Existing Sites In-Building Coverage (-76dBm) Map: Proposed In-Building Coverage Site ID: LI13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 -T- .Mobile-~ Map Scale: tin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/3012010 Proposed Site Existing Sites In-Building Coverage (-76dBm) Map: Composite In-Building Coverage Site ID: LII 3-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 ~T- .Mobile-~ Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04t30/2010 Proposed Site Existing Sites ~ In-Vehicle Coverage (-84dBm) Map: Existing In-Vehicle Coverage Site ID: LI13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 N- .Mobile-~' Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30t2010 Proposed Site Existing Sites m In-Vehicle Coverage (-84dBm) Map: Proposed In-Vehicle Coverage Site ID: LI13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 Map Scale: 1in=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04t30/2010 ~ Proposed Site ~ Existing Sites lin-Vehicle Coverage (-84dBm) Map: Composite In-Vehicle Coverage Site ID: LI13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi .~..Mobile.~ Map Date: 04130t2010 · Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ -75 dBm Coverage Map: Existing Coverage Site ID: LI13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi .Mobile- Map Date: 04/30/2010 · Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ -75 dBm Coverage Map: Proposed Coverage Site ID: LII3-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 .Mobile, Map Scale: 1in=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30/2010 · Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ -75 dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage Site ID: LI13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 .Mobile, Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30/2010 Proposed Site Existing Sites -85 dBm Coverage Map: Existing Coverage Site ID: LI13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 ~..Mobile.~ Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30/2010 Proposed Site Existing Sites -85 dBm Coverage Map: Proposed Coverage Site ID: LI13~34SA Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 .Mobile, Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30t2010 Proposed Site Existing Sites -85 dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage Site ID: LII3-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 -Mobile, Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04t30t2010 Proposed Site Existing Sites -95 dBm Coverage Map: Existing Coverage Site ID: LI13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 .Mobile, Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30t2010 · Proposed Site · Existing Sites -95 dBm Coverage Map: Proposed Coverage Site ID: LI13-34SA Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY 11939 .Mobile- Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30t2010 · Proposed Site · Existing Sites -95 dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage Site ID: Ll13-345A Site Name: East Marion Fire Department Site Address: 9245 Main Street Southold, NY t 1939 .MoNle- Map Scale: lin=0.3862 mi Map Date: 04/30/2010 Page 1 of 1 Kalin, Carol From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 1:28 PM To: dick@telecomsol.com Cc: Winser, Kristy; Kalin, Carol Subject: T Mobile East Marion Fire District consultant fee received - proceed with review Dear Mr. Comi, The Town has received the required consultant fee from the applicant. You may proceed with your review of this project. SCTM# 31-3-11.31 East Marion Fire District co-location for T Mobile. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza~town.southold.ny.us From: Randolph, Linda Sent: Wednesday, 3uly 14, 2010 12:04 PM To: Winser, KrisW Cc.' Lanza, Heather Subject: Consultant fee 7/14/2010 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location T-Mobile at East Marion Fire District Site Plan Name: , Application Date: 4~ /2~ / zctO Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-. 31 3 Other SCTM #s: 11.31 Street Address: 9245 Main Road Distance to nearest intersection: Hamlet: East Mari0rl~- Type of Site Plan: New X Amended If Amended, last approval date: __/__/ Residential SECTION B: Owners/A~[ent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number.for the people below: Property Owner East Marion Fi re Di strict Street 9245 Main Road City East Marion State New York Zip_ 11939 Home Telephone Other (631)-477-0163 Applicant T-Mobile Northeast LLC Street 3500 Sunrise Highway, Suite D203 City Great River State NY Zip 11739 Other (631)-224-6651 Home Telephone~ Applicant's Agent or Representative: ContactPerson(s)*. Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP Street 36 North New York Avenue City. Huntington State New York Zip 11743 Office Telephone (631)-425-4100 Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: New Property total acreage or square footage: Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ×Modification of Existing Structure Change of use 3. 0583 ac.)~R. 330 ~:x/sq. fi. (0.00762 ac.) __Aghculmral Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes If yes, explain: No Property ZoningDistrict(s): HB and R-40 Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 12 / 15 / 09 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes __ No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No X Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: List all proposed property uses: Same as existing Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: 0.30 % Proposed lot coverage: Gross floor area of existing structure(s): If more then one use is Fire District and Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facilit O.25 % sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: 28+ # of proposed spaces: 0 Loading Berth: Yes No X Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 0.27 % Proposed landscape coverage: 0.27 % Waterfront Data: Is this property w~th~n 500 of a wetland area. Yes No X If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify that all theabove information is tree. Signature of Preparer: By: /'/~~ Date: ' t Page 3 of 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD WIRELESS FACILITY SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION Application Name (use same name as Site Plan Application Name); ,,, i ~ T-Mobile at East Marion Fire District j~ ~.~ ~D~ Application Date: Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000 - 31 3 11.31 Other SCTM#'s: Street Address: 9245 Main Road Hamlet: East Marion Checklist of application materials required to be submitted (see Special Exception Application Requirements Handout or {}280-74 D. of the Southold Town Code for details) One copy of the building permit application materials Complete site plan application submission YOne copy of the deed or lease agreement for the use of the property ~///~ Analysis of site location alternatives ~///~ Effort to co-locate documentation (if this is not a co-location) Propagation maps showing existing facilities and service in the town ~Evidence supporting existence of inadequate service Special Exception Application Fee form updated 5/4/2009 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM NO. 3 TO: T Mobile USA, Inc. Maxton Technology 20 W Crescent Avenue Allendale, NJ 07401 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 15, 2009 Please take notice that your application dated November 18, 2009 For permit to co-locate a wireless facility and install new equipment at Location of property: 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 31 Block 3 Lot 11.31 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed request to co-locate a wireless facility & install new equipment requires Planning Board site plan review & special exception approval pe~ Section 280-71 of the Town Code, Authorized Signature CC: file, Planning Board Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: October 15, 2009 TO: T Mobile USA, Inc. Maxton Technology 20 W Crescent Ave. Allendale, NJ 07401 Please take notice that your application dated September 14, 2009 For permit ~~t & install ui merit at . Location of property: 9245 Main Road E. Marion NY L__-- ~- County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 31 Block 3 Lot 11.31 ls returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: 2009 The proposed construction requires Planning Board site plan review & special exception approval per Section 280-71 of the Town Code. ~rized Signature CC: file, Planning Board change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require Note to Applicant: Any Town Building Department. further review by the Southold at&t Glynn Walker AT&T Mobility 5405 Windward Pkwy. Alpharetta, GA 36004 (770) 708-6122 GPD ASSOCIA'rES Kevin Clements 520 South Main St., Suite 2531 Akron, Ohio 44311 (330) 572-2195 kclements@gpdgroup.com GPD~ 2009263.69 May 15, 2009 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT AT&T DESIGNATION: Site USl D: 48290 Site FA #: 10107550 Site Name: WEST ORIENT POI NT T-MOBILE DESIGNATION: Site Name: East Marion Site Number: LI13345 ANALYSIS CRITERIA: Codes: TIA/EIA-222-F & 2003 IBC 85-mph with 0" ice 74-mph with 112" ice SITE DATA: 9395 Main Rd., East Marion, New York 11939, Suffolk County Latitude 41 ° 7' 48.396"N, Longitude 72 o 20' 23.567"W 109' PennSummit Flagpole Mt. Walker, GPD is pleased to submit this Structural Analysis Report to determine the structural integrity of the aforementioned tower. The purpose of the analysis is to determine the suitability of the tower with the addition of the following proposed loading configuration: Elev. 87' (3) TMBXX-6516-R2M Antennas, Pipe Mounted, inside the existing shroud w/(12) 7/8" internal coax (3) Andrew E'~/V190VS12UB Tower Mounted Amplifiers inside the shroud (3) RFS/Celwave ATMAA1412D-1A20 Tower Mounted Amplifiers inside the shroud Based on our analysis we have determined the designs of the tower and its foundation are sufficient far the proposed, existing, and reserved loadings as referenced in Appendix A. We at GPD appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and AT&T. questions please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, New York #: 071387-1 ~ If you have any 520 South Main Street. Suite 2531 . Akron, Ohio 44311. 330-572-2100. Fax 330-572-2101 . www. GPDGroup.com Glaus Pyle Schomer Burns ar~cl I)e Haven, Inc Akron, Cleveland. Columbus. Indianapolis TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN IIALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 www. noFtbrork.net/Southold/ PERMIT NO. E,q)irafion ,20 BUILDING PERI~PLICATION CHECKLIST Do y~ hme ~ r*'~] ~ac th{lo'wlng, ~:)re epp~/in~ ~ of H~lth 4 ~'ts of Building Phms Cl~k Sep~ N.Y.S.D.E.C. Tn~e~ Building Inspector ~PPL1CATION FOR BUILDING PERMrF l:)atc , INSTRUCTIONS mpletely filled in by typewritor or in ink and submittod to the Buildthg Impec~or with 3 Fee according to schedule. riot ami of buildings on premises, rel~ionship to adjolnlnE premls~ or public sUeets or c. The wmic covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this applicalfion, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Pemzit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premi~ available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or th pm for any propose what so ~v~r until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every buildlng lm~mt shall expire if the work authorized has oct conm~e~e,d within 12 momhs ~ ~ ~ of issuance or has not beon completed within 18 months from snob d~, If no zoning amcod~ncots or otbe~ regulalions alleging property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in vaiting, the extrusion of the permit for an addition six months. Tbe~fler, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of u Building Permit pursuit to ~he Building Zone Ordlmmce of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein des~ibed. The applic~t agrees to comply with all applicable laws, Ordln*nces, building code, homing code, ~md regulafiom, and to admit mahofized imp~tors on premises and in building for necess~y i~pe~on~. Sta~e whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, eleclrlcian, plumber or builder (As on ~h~ tax roll or I~e~t deed) If applicant is a co~oration, signature of duly amhorized (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No Other Trade's License No. I. Location of land on whichoro~_sed work will be done: House Number Street ' Hamlet County tax Map No. 1000 Section 31 Block 11.31 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot (Name) State existing use and occupancy of promises and intendqi u~e and occupancy of proposal constmctio~ Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Addition ~ Alter~on ,' . ' ~ (To be paid on filing this application) If dwelling, nmnbcr of dwelling units ~ Number of dwelling units on each floor If 0ara~, num~ of cam If bmin~, comra~i~l or mix~l o~upancy, ~ecify mm~ *nd extent of ~h ~ of u~. Fl'~ Dimensiom of ~J~ing ~s, if any: Front Rear .Depth Height I fO F*~g~V Number of Stories Vo ' Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front ~ Rear Depth -- Height ~"7 ~ NUmber of Stories Height Number of Stories Size of lot: Front Rear Depth I0. Date of Purchase ~ Name of Former Owner II.Zoneorusedistrictinwhichp~misesare$itua~edWNS/C7 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation'/YES __NO 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO ~ Will excess fill be removed from p~mises? YES 14. N~mez of Owner of lLrcmises~Addrcss qa ~S Nam¢ofAmhitcct ~.¥ ~"7',~.'~'~ . Addrcsz~gl ~0~r~ Pt'~t'~PhoncNo Name of Con~'actor f~ ~A~OA} "l'l~c.J'g~]~ ~ Addrcss~l ~'~'ON Pt~f' ~-~Phon¢ No~ 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wctlm~d or a f~shwatcr wetland? *YES NO * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE~EQUIP~D. b. Is this property within 300 fozt of a tidal wetland? * YES NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accura~ foundation plan and distances to property line~. of said owner or owne~, and is duly aufl~orized to perform or have pe~ormed the said work and to make ~ ~e ~ ~U~ Ihat sll statements contained in this application me Uue to the best of his Imowledge and belief; ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ performed in the manner set forth in the application filed thcrcwith. Sworn to be fro'edge ~*-' ~ / ~.~ / , / NO[ARyPUBLIC ~l / ~TATE OF*NEW JERSEY "[-/ MY COUIdIS810~ EXPIRES JULY 1, 2011 [ N/F LOT 1 GEATRAKIS dc GEORGE KORTSOLAKI N/r / PLOT PLAN NOTES; THE METES AND BOUNDS, SETBACK DIMENSIONS. AND OTHER MEASUREMENTS AND DEPICTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TAKEN FROM A PLAN PREPARED BY INFINIGY ENGINEERING, AND ARE NOT A RESULT OF MEASUREMENTS. FIELD NOTES, OR OTHER INFORMA'HON GATHERED BY MAXTON TECHNOLOGY OR BAY STATE DESIGN. T-Mobile Northeast, LLC SUBMI'FI'ALS LI 13--345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT SHEET TITLE PLOT PLAN SHEET NUMBER FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY ,SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: ~' / ~,3 / ~ ,~, Date Sent: Project Name: ~ Project Address: ,~2 ~-/~" Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- ~ / - ~ -ff.~/Zoning District: Request: ~"J~,~,~/~, l~'r(~'~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~. d (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted://~ Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: S~gn'a-t~re of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / / Date of Comment: J~0 / /v~'/ O~ / ,Final Determination Date: / Sigdatt~re~5'f Planning Dept. S(a~ff~RksL'ie~ Decision: Signature of Building Inspector BUILDING DEPARTMEN~ TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 76~1802 FAX: (631) 765-9~02 www. nor thfork,neOSouthold/ Exam/ned .20 Approved ,20 Disapproved n/~ PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form Building Inspector ~PPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date ,20 INSTRUCTIONS ,mpletely filled in by typewrfler or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 Fee according to schedule.. .............. r Hot nnd of buddings on p~nuses, rela~onship to adjoining pte~mses or ptmnc su~ts o a~,cas, and wnlerways. c. The wink covered by this npplicmion may not be con~nenced before isst~mce of Building permit. d. Upon approval of ~ npplicalion, Ihe Building Inspector vn~l issue a Building Permit to the npphc~a. Such a penml shall be kept on ~e premises avnilnble for inspection lhroughout the work. e No bm'ldina shnll be occuPi~l °r used in wh°lc °r in part f°r may pu~p°se what ~ ~ ~ ~ B~ ~ issues a CeRifica~ of ~. f. Every buitding permit shall expire if the wink aulhorized hns not commenced within 12 m°nths ~ ~ ~ °f issuance or has not been completed wilt~in 18 months from such dnte. If no zoning nme~dments or olher regulations nffe~in$ prope~y have been enacted in Ilse interim, the Building Inspe~or may zulhonze, m writing, the extension of the penmt for addilion six months. Themal~r, a new permit slmll be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building l~ent for Ihe issunnce of a Building permit pu~wnt to Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk Cotmty, New Yo~k, nmi other npp~icable Laws, Ordinnn~es ~he Regulations, for the conslruclion of buildings, addi~ons, or alte~n~ons or for ~moval or demolmon ~s hereto descn~t. zpplicz~l ngrees to comply with all ~plicnble laws, ordinnnces, building code, housing code, md regulnaenz, nnd to ~m~ co. ~. )t (Mnilingaddr-'~,sofnpplic~t) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, amhite~, engineer, general ~ontra~mr, ¢le~tncmn, plumber or builder (As on the tax roll or l~test de~d) ffappli~ant is a ~orporation, signature of duly authorized (Name and title of ~orpor~e ofli~r) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which ~.?l~_sed work will be done: ' ~ ~H~m~e House Number Street t County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 31 Block Subdivision Filed Map No. CNam¢) Estimated Cost~' 6 If dwelling, humid' of dw¢ilin§ units If garage, number of cars State existing use and oceu~cy of premises and int~n' use and ocgupancy of L constmctio~c 2. ~. Existing use and occupancy ~"f'~,T L0f~oe~ r'//~t0t~O. 3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building. Addition ~- , Alteration __ (To be paid on filing this application) 5. ~ Number of dwelling units on each floor If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each ~ype of use. Dimensions of existing slructu~ if any: Front Rear Depth Height Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Height ~:>'7' ~ NUmber of Stories ' Rear Depth Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Height .Number of 8todes Size of lot: Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase. ~ Name of Former Owner ll. Zoncorusedislrictinwhichpi~nisesaresituated Low mns,q- 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES __ NO 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES __ NO I/' Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES__ NO__ 14. NamesofOwnerofpremises~]0~ ~ Address ?~/S fi~0,,l'N ~. PhoneNo. i~.~/-~/~7~0o~,~ Name of Architect ]~.Y ~TT'~"~ . Add~ss,~g/0e~q[~ Ptc~t J~,PhoneNo~ Name of Con,actor /Ii ~;(q~O/q q~r.~10Jo~ ~ Address2.${ ~g'O/~ ~t'~C~Phone 15 a. Is this property wlthin 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO * IF YES, SOIYI'HOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BEJI~EQUIRED. b. I~ lifts ptolemy within 300 f~'t of a tidal wetland? * YES' NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation ~ ~_..~.~]~oint on property is at lO fe~ or below, must provide topographical d~to on survey. COUNT~ ' -~~ ~--~/.~ ~.~.~t:2.._~ being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applic., (Name o f in~u~l sJ~anin~ ceI~:i~C0 above ila~led. (Comractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said own~ or owne~, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this applicafian; that all sla~emems comained in lhis applicafian ~e line to the best of his knowledge and belief; end that Ihe work will be performed in lhe roamer set forth in the application filed therewith. T-~OBILE USA, INC. I~laxton Technology 260 W Crescent Avenoe Allendale, NJ 07401 September 11, 2009 Town of Southold - Building Department Atln: Vicki Toth (Building Pr, mitS Coordinator) 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1802 RE: T-MobileNortheast, LLC Proposed Public Utility Wireless Teleeomm,mications Facility - Collocation on the existing AT&T monopole/flagpole on the property of the East Marion Fire Department Premises: 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY 11939 SBL: Section: 31, Block: 3, Lot: 11.31 Project Title: T-Mobile LI 13 345A (EIVIFD) Dear Vicki: We are the Site Acquisition Consultants for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC in connection with the above-captioned matter. Per our telephone conversations over the last couple of days, enclosed are the Building Permit Application Submission requirements as outlined in the Town of Southoid Guide-lines for a proposed Collocation Coy T- Mobile) on an existing public utility wireless telecommunications structure (AT&T's existing flagpole/monopole) and related equipment on the property at the above-captioned premises, as depicted in the site-plan he~-~vith. The package contains the following: 1.) Building Permit Application signed and notarized 2.) Application Fee ($500.00) ck # 2483 3.) 4 Copies of Building Plans (construction drawings) - ***Please note that All references to 1 1/4" cable~ on building plans will be revised to 7/8" cable size and re-sent to you. 4.) 1 Plot Plan 5.) Storm Water Run-off Assessment form (signed and notarized) 6.) Letter of Authorization from EMFD 7.) AT&T Owner's consent to sublease letter Based on our recent conversations, we will provide you with the additional documentation stated in code §280- 74, pm'agraph (B) as follow in addition to those required in §144-8 C: Uo Written analysis demonstrating the project complies with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations in accordance with § 280-71H. Written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance with local, State and Federal Codes. Copies of all applicable FCC licenses, notices of proposed construction or alteration, federal environmental impact statements and other documents verifying compliance with federal, state and local regulations. It would be greatly appreciated if you can please accept this Building Permit package as is for the purpose of beginning the review process. I will provide you with the above documentation shortly. Please contact me to confirm receipt of this package. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please do not hesitate Io contact me as well. gli Si6uffi - 201.953.§4~/5 Maxton Technology for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC esiouffi(~gmail.com Please mail any correspondence to the following address: 39 Andover Drive Wayne, NS 07470 Arm: Todd Padreza (Maxton Technology for T-Mobile) APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva. Gerard R Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Ch~5~ae~ Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman http:#southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 Mailin~ Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 RECEIVED t~IA~ 12 2OO7 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING HELD: MARCH 8, 2007 ~t ClerJ ZB File No. 5972 - EAST MARION FIRE DISTRICT Property Location: 9245 Main Road, East Marion Zone Districts (split): HB Hamlet Business; R-40 Low Density Residential CTM 31-3-11.31 containing 3.05 acres SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. In addition, the Town Planning Board has issued a Negative Declaration with a Determination of Non-Significance dated September 11, 2006. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property contains 3.05 acres owned by the East Marion Fire Distdct and improved with two Fire House structures, as shown on the site plan prepared by Infinigy Engineering dated 8/17/06. BASIS OF APPLICATION: The applicant requests a Vadance under Section 280-69 (100-162A3, A5), based on an application for a building permit and the Building Inspector's July 25, 2006 Notice of Disapproval, concerning construction of a proposed wireless communication/telecommunications monopole tower on properly owned, leased or otherwise controlled by a special district approved by the commissioners of the special district. The proposed tower will exceed the code limitation - with a height greater than 10 feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet of the facility, OR higher than 10 feet above the average tree canopy height in that radius measured from ground level if there are no buildings within 300 feet. Also, if there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility site, all telecommunication towers shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions, SPECIAL DISTRICT: The applicant, East Marion Fire District (EMFD), is an established special district for emergency communications on at least 4.35 acres of land. The EMFD maintains its fire station cornmunicetion transmissions to and from this site, and the wireless communications tower would be in a location that provides sufficient space and height to provide an installation of a 450 Hz antenna, north of the firehouse. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application has been referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning replied in its communications dated November 24, 2006 and January 22, ZE~ File No. 5972 - East Marion Fi/'~strtct CTM No. 31-3-11.31 2007 stating that the application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. TOWN CODE CHAPTER 95 (268) LWRP CONSISTENCY: This application has also been referred as required under Chapter 95 (268} of the Town Code, and LWRP Coordinator Mark Terry has issued a determination dated April 26, 2006, received October 23, 2006, stating that this application is consistent with the Policy Standards. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public headng on this application on November 30, 2006 and January 25, 2007, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant, East Marion Fire District, wishes to construct a telecommunications monopole tower to support public safety communications antennas, at a maximum height of 120 feet. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, The site where the monopole antenna will be constructed is presently open space lying just north of the two structures that serve the community of Easl Marion as a firehouse. The site has been used for many years for the purposes of storing and maintaining fire fighting and associated support equipment such as fire trucks, hoses, ladders and radio equipment to communicate during actual fires. The addition of this monopole antenna will improve the reliability of the radio equipment currently in use. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The East Marion Fire District only owns one piece of real property, and it is upon this property that the monopole antenna will be erected. Security, electrical supply, and proximity to the source of dispatch demand that the principal antenna be located as close to the firehouse as possible. 3, The alternative relief granted herein is substantial. The vadance sought by the applicant and the alternative relief granted herein, will increase the antenna height at least 90% over the code maximum, (The code requirement is a maximum of 60 feet in height.) Although a monopole antenna of this size will create some visual change in the area, this change must be balanced against the necessity of improving emergency communications for the community. 4. Granting of the altemative relief for a height variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The monopole antenna is designed to withstand the highest anticipated wind velocities and constructed in accordance to current engineering standards. All equipment required for powering and maintenance of the antenna will be located within a securely fenced area surrounding the base of the monopole, which Page 3 - March 8, 2007 Z'B File No. 5972 - East Merion CTM No. 31-3-11.31 will be screened by native plantings. All radio transmissions will be regulated by appropriate agencies. 5. The alleged difficulty has not been self-created. It is necessary to update the means of communications as technology advances with time. The current technology requires a certain tower height in order to guarantee adequate coverage of the fire district. 6. The proposed height is not the minimum that is necessary to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The testimony presented was not sufficient to persuade that the antenna height of 120 feet is necessary to provide the desired coverage at the fire district. The Board considers the substantial altemative relief granted to be sufficient to satisfy the applicant's needs and to meet reasonable concerns of public safety. 7. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a telecommunications tower facility, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Simon, seconded by Member Oliva, and duly carried, to DENY the variance as applied for, and in the ALTERNATIVE, to GRANT a variance in the location shown on the 6-17-06 Infinigy Site Diagram (setbacks 105 feet from the north lot line, 196+/- feet set back from the westerly lot line), at a maximum antenna height of 110 feet, subject to the following conditions: 1) The covering of the monopole shall be painted a color that will make it blend into the area. The board suggests a neutral color such as gray or gray- blue. 2) No flag shall be placed upon the monopole antenna. 3) The monopole shall not be lighted except as required by law. That these ZBA conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificete of Occupancy, when issued, Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or sun/ey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members, Oliva, Goehringer~,Simon, and Weisman. Nay: Chairman Dinizio (in favor of requested 120 ft. hei . This Res luti n was duly opted (4-1). Ja,F~e~-Dinizio Jr.~CEairrn~n-" / "3/9/2007 AiOproved for Filing · .-,~"' ~' EAST MARION FiRE DISTRICT APPROVAL REVIEW FORM ROBERT S. ~YO T-Mobile Northeast, LLC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY, SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SITE TYPE: COLOCATION ON EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE VICINITY MAP DIRECTIONS 1. HEAD NORTH ON CONNETOUOT AVENUE APPROX{MA~ELy 0.2 MILE TO ~HE ON-RAMP FOR SUNRISE HIGHWAY (ROUTE 27) F~ST. 2. TAKE SUNRISE HIGHWAY (ROUTE 27) E~ST APPROXIMATELY 22.6 MILES. SHEET INDEX PROJECT SUMMARY SITE NUMBER: U 13-545A SITE NAME: EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT (COLOCAnON) PROPERTY CONTACT: ROBEET HICKS 631-477-0539 (EMFD) PROPERTY OWNER: TOWER OWNER: AT&T MOBILITY PO BOX 97079 REDMOND, WA 98073-9779 TOWER CONTACT: RAYMOND CR[WS NE REGIONAL ACCOUNT MANAGER 201--208-5138 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY., STE. D-203 GREAT R~/ER, NY 11759 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ~-~XTON SUBMITrALS SITE LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT TITLE SHEET T-1 GENERAL NOTES · ~ CONSTRUCTION NOTES ABBREVIATIONS I I .~.~ ,o ~.,~ ~ ~o.~/.~ ~ ~.,~..[.~., ~ ,. ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~o..~ ,~. ~, o. ELECTRICAL DESIGN CRITERIA NOTES /I GENERAL SITE NOTES H H NOTES SCALE: 1' = 30' NO CONSTRUC~ON SHALL BE DONE W~OUT APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TO CONSULT THE: S1T~UCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. R~J~ TO LATEST RFDS FOR NNTENNA/COAX INFORMATION OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ~-~XTON LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN Sn'E LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN & EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN NO CONSTRUCIION SHALL BE DONE WITHOUT APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TO CONSULT 1HE STRUCTURAL ENG NEER PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. R~IE~ TO LAim.~T RI'DS FOR NIII~mNA/COAX NFORMATION T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ~-~XTON SUBMfl~-ALS SOUTHWEST ELEVATION (3----- SCALE: 3/16 = 1' O" SITE LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT SHEET 'rifLE ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER A-2 I SE~ION A-A mwou ~ SECTION B-B ~ua~ s~ ~ ~couP~ S~L DEPARTMENT (~. or ~) DETAILS ~.. o, ,) ~ D~NL ~ VEG~A~ SCREENING ~ SHE~ NUMBER A~EN~ ~t: ~.~.s. TREE P~NG & PRUNING ANTENNA TECHNICAL FEATURES ~ ~ co~ ~ ~ ~,.r~m ~O.E~ c~ ~GN~K SPEC~UM MPE5566 NOR~L S-12000 ~ SIDE ~ 'B' ' ~ ~' : ~ .i ' ~ , , I I I I ] , I, ~ ~ ' ~ ." / . " CONSTRUCTION T-I~ILE NORTHEAST RF~ ANTENNA &: CABLE SCHEDULE0 I REFER TO LAle.b~ RFDS FOR I N~NA/COAX INFORMATION BILL Of MATERIALS NO. QTY.: DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER PART BILL OF MATERIALS MINIMUM CABLE BENDING RADIUS MINIMUM CABLE BENDING RADIUS CHART GENERAL ANTENNA INSTALLATION NOTES TYPICAL CABLE SECTOR ROUTING DEr. AIL (F) .~/2' ,Ju~ Om.) ;;4 ~;~') ~-V*', c~ m.. Fo. ~CTO. [] . LEGEND T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ~-~X TO N SUBMITFALS SITE LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE D EPARTM ENT ANTENNA & CABLE SCHEDULE, BILL OF MATERIALS, & ROUTING SCHEMATIC A-5 O T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ·/-~o ~ ~ TON '--'& ~ ~ ~-. , ,. --'- ONEUNE DIAG~ GROUNDING RIS~ D~G~ ~ ~: SUBMI~ALS ', l! ~---~--4~-~ ................. /--p~ Il ~., ~ ~ ~ ,-~ ~,~ ........... .......... ........ ~ ~ST MARION FI~E DEPARTMENT ONE-LINE AND GROUNBINO RISER DIAGRAMS, AND GROUNDING NOTES POWER RISER D~G~M' ~ SHE~ NUMBER souo t EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR (~EGB) Q COAXIAL ANTENNA GROUNDING DETAIL T (wP.) STEP 1 STEP ANTENNA CABLE WATERPROOFING DETAIL CABLE GROUNDING KIT (CGK) DETAIL TYPICAL GROUND BAR CONNECTIONS DETNL GROUND~.~,: .~s WELL DETAIL BACKF1LL BURIED~.~_,: ,*~ CONDUIT DETAIL GROUNDING NOTES CONDUffSTUB-UP T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ~-~XTON SUBMITTALS SITE LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT ELECTRICAL & GROUNDING DETAILS [-2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application ofT-Mobile Northeast LLC At the premises: 9245 Main Road East Marion, New York Section 31, Block 3, Lot 11.31 STATE OF NEW YORK ) )SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) AUTHORIZATION OF OWNER ~lo~trpl4 /k/. b/A-~//.)t:-~[o?'-t'/. , being duly sworn, deposes and says: I mn the ~14~tt~vqt~, I.~OA. et30~ ~tge-~-at~ ~$~East Marion Fire District, owner in fee of the premises known as Section 31, Block 3, Lot 11.31 (the "Premises" hereaI2er), and do hereby authorize T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile") and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal approvals as may be necessary for constructing or installing on the Premises such antennas, support structures, and related equipment as T-Mobile may require for the establishment of its public utility wireless telecommunication facility. As such, I will fully cooperate with T-Mobile and its agents in obtaining any required Approvals. Sworn to before me this CT~ARY p~U~3L¢~ EAS~ON F,t~.E DISTRICT By: ~/~t~~& CAROL A. MILLER NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YORK NO. 01MI6003086 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY ,~_~. COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 23, APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (As to Owner) Tbe To~w~ of Soutbold's Code of Etbics prohibits conflicts of interest on the r~art of town officers and emt~lovees. The ~urDose of this form is to provide informatioa which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is (Last name, first native, middle initial, mdess you are applying in the name of person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPIACATION: (Check all tbat apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning X Other (If"Other", name the activity..) Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship witb any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership o f (or employment by) a corporation iu which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the sbares. YES NO ~ If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position o f that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicanqagenqrepresentative) and the town officer or employee. Eitber check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (cheek all that apply): __A) the owner of greater than 5% oftbe shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); __B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entii7 (when the applicant is not a corporation); __C) an officer, director, partner, or employee &the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS I Submitled th~y of~,l~JO'qO'~ e~--.-- 200 ~ Signature ~4 fft~/J:lSP'[~ __ Print Name ~.~. ~t . b/A,qB¢.~,oo'mt- . APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM Tile Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The pumose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts oflnterest and allow it to take whatever action is necessaryt°av°idsat~e-MoDi]e Northeast LLC YOUR NAME: By: ~"~ ~k-r..~l~, (Last name, first f~ame, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company, lfso, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If "Other", name the activity.) Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation ill which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES", complete the balance &this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position oftlmt person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or elnployee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); __B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or __D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS 1 Submitted thi.s ~_day of t~OM 2002 Signature By. //"~,'t~4~-~-~-~-t~ PrintName ~"7"//,-t F"~'O-t',~ ' "'STATE OF NEW YORK. -COUNTY OF SUFFOLK.. deposes and says that' he resides at '~ ' 3C~ '/V'd./q 0. p¢, being duly swcrn, 'c/o 3500 5unri~_e Highwa.v,.Suite. D203 ...... I~ ~e ~.¢ New Y~r~ and ~at he Is ~e owner ¢ ~e above properS, or ~at he Is ~e ~q~-~r,~q ~e Lgss'b~/Ap~lican~-Tr-~b~le 'Nortbea~ LLC k~e) ~: U ~ j . (spe~ w~mer m~emhmp or Corp,1 which Is hereby making appilca~ion~ ~hat [here are no exlsUng structures or ImprovemenbS on [he land Which are not show~ on'[he Site Plan; [hat[he UUe. to [he enLlre parcel, .Including all rightS,of-way, has ' been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no paKc of the P an t~rlpges upon any duly flied plan which has not been abandoned both 'as bo IoL~ and.{~s to roads;'that ha has examined all rules and ragu a~ions adopb~d bY' [he Planning Board for the flllh{] of Site Plans and will comp Y with same; that the plans submitted, as approved; will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approVal o¢ the Planning ·Board; and [hat [:he act;ual physical lmprbvem.en~S will be installed in ~b'ict accordance With the plaps submitted. .' · Signed .... T' n ) ' · (Partner or C~morata Officer and T~tle) Sworn b3 me this . ' · ~ day o~ N0'~CJA/t ~ ~O'_E~ . . JENNIFER DONOHUE N,OTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW'YORK .No. 01Do6211094 Qualified In Suffolk County My Commbslon Expires Sepfernber 08, 2013 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the application of proposal of T-Mobile Northeast LLC For Approval to colocate public utility wireless telecommunications antennas inside an existing monopole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road East Marion, New York District 1000, Section 31, Block 3, Lot 11.31 COLOCATION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Todd Padreza, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am the Long Island Site Acquisition Manager for Maxton Technology, Inc., Site Acquisition Consultant and Agent for T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile") and am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances hereinafter set forth. 2. The business address of Maxton Technology, Inc. is 19 Industrial Avenue, Mahwah, New Jersey, 07458. 3. I make this affidavit pursuant to Town of Southold Code Section 280-74D(2). 4. Upon information provided by the owner of the subject monopole, I understand that the subject monopole will be capable of accommodating colocation of additional antennas for futura users. Swom to before me this ~{o day of ~[ arra/////'f~/03~/r"J/ Qualified In Kings Coun~ Commission Expires Feb 27 20-h TO: T Mobile USA, Inc. Maxton Technology 20 W Crescent Avenue Allendale, NJ 0740~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 15, 2009 Please take notice that your application dated November 18, 2009 For permit to co-locate a wirel.ess fa~ and install new equipm~ent a_t Locatioh of property: 9245 Main Road East M_arion~,_~y_Ny County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 31 Block 3 Lot 11.31 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed request to co-locate a wireless facility & install new equipment requires Planning Board site plan review & special exception approval per Section 280-71 of the Town Code. Authorized Signature CC: file, Planning Board Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. TOWN OF SouTHoLD BIJILDING DEP~ TO~ R~t, SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 76,%1852 FAX: (631) 768-9802 wvav. n orttafork, ne~athold/ Approwi ,20 PERMIT NO. BuUd~ lml~aor APPLICATION FOR BIJRDI~G PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS , ' ~ This appiicagon MUST b~ ~ompletely ~lle, d in by typewri~ or in init a~d subm~ ~ ~e ~g ~ ~ ~ s~ls of plans, accurate plot pLq~ to sca[~. F~, accoriling to ~l'~'ule. b. Plot pla~ showing location of lot ~:d of buildings on ~ ll:lalionship ~o a~oining premises or public ~ or c, The veork co~r~t by &is lpplic*fion may not b~ commim~t b~f~te/ssuance o f Building Permlt issu~ a Oartificate of Oc~pa~.. - - £ Every buildi~ p~'mll sh~ll e~pit~ ifth~ work a~ho'dze~ ha~ not ~o~t~I within 12 momhs at~ th~ dam of addition six mon~s. Thexeag~', a n~w ~ ~h~! be required. APPLICATION IS HEKEB¥ MADE t~ tt~ Building De~rtmsnt for th~ m~mrm* of a Bm'lding p~ ~ ~ ~ Building Zorn Ordinanm of ff~e Town of Soath~ld, Suffolk County, New York. and other a~licablc Laws, Ora~s~ces or R~ulatlom, for da~ eonsmmion o£builaTmgs, addigom, or altm ~fions or for removal or demolilion as h~a~in desire'bed. Th~ StYe whether ~vpticant is owner, Iessee~ agin, a otohiteoh engineer, genia'sl contractor, cle, otrici~t, pltanber or builder (As on Ibc tax roll or Iat~ deed) If applicant is a mrpotation, signature of duly augloriz~ officer Builders Lkav~ No. Plumb~a-s License No. Ele~"icta.~s Liegnso No. ~h~ T~e's Li~ Com~ T~ ~No. l~ ~aon ~J BI~ Su~on F~ ~ No. Size of lot: Front ......... Rear 10. Date o£Poxchase. I2. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~g I~, ~i~.~ or ~? ~S NO * F ~ mmom ~ ~us~s & D~C. Pm mY BE~. ' IF YE~ DZ.C. P~ ~Y BE ~Q~. 16. P.,x>vide survey, to aoale, with ~e ~,_mte foma~atioet plan ami distances to property lines. Radio Frequency - Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report Prepared for: T-Mobile USA C/O Maxton Technolosy Inc. 50 Eastman Street South Easton, MA 02375 Site # LI13345A East Marion Fire Department 9245 Main Road East Marion, New York 11939 EBI CONSULTING Creating Value for Your Business EBI Project No. 6209199 I October 15, 2009 RF EME Compliance Report LI13345A EBI Project # 62091991 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY Executive Vice President Note that EBI's scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the P, adio Frequency - Electromagnetic Energy (RF- EM~:) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this repons. The engineering and design of the building and related structures, ns well ns the impact of the antennas nnd broadcast equipment on the structural integrity of the building, are specifically excluded from EBl's scope of work. Consulting LI 13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EHE Comoliance Report 9245 Plain Road. E~st Fearion. New York 11939 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTROOUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. S~TE/PRoJECT DESCRmTK)t4 .................................................................................................................................... 5 3. RESULTS Of RF EME PIOOEUNG ............................................................................................................................. & 4. FflmGATION/SITE CONTROL OFTK:)NS ................................................................................................................. 7 5. SL,If"f'~Y ANO CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................... 8 &. LIf~ITATIO~qS ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 7. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 TARLE I TABLES ANTENNA MOUNT AND EXPOSURE DETAIL APPENDIX A APPENDIX · APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDICES RF-EME MODELING DATA RADIO FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (RF-EME) SAFETY PLAN MODELING EXPORT FILES SrrE PLANS EBI Consulting U 13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Com01iance Re~ort 9245 Plain Road. East Marion. New York I 1¢)3¢) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consukin~ or EBI) has been contras'ted by T-Mobile to conduct radio frequency electrom~netic (RF-EME) modeling for T-Hobile Site #LII1345A at 9245 Main Road in East Plariofl, New York to determine worst-case predicted RF-EHE exposure levels from wireless communications equipment installed at this site. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modetin~ in relation to relevant Federal Communications Commission (FCC) RF-EPIE compliance standards for limit~ human exposure to RF-EME rmkls. This document addresses the comldiance of T- Ptoblle's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to aH collocated facilities at the site. As presented in the sections below, based off worst-case theoretical modetifl& d~ere are no areas in front of the T-Mobile antennas on any walkir~ sur~ce that exceed the FCC standards for lefleral population and occupational exposure. However, there are areas where workers elevated above the ~round may be exposed to power densities ~reater thin the general population and occupitkmal limits. EBI UI3345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Plain Road. East Marion. New York 11939 INTRODUCTION Radio frequency waves are electromagnetic waves from the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum at frequencies lower than visible light and microwaves. The wavelengths of radio waves range from thousands of meters to around 30 centimeters. These wavelengths correspond to frequencies as Iow as 3 cycles per seconds (or hertz [Hz]) to as higt~ as one lilahertz (~me billion cycles per second). Personal Communication (PCS) faci~ies used by T-Mobile in this area operate within a frequency range of 1710-2155 MHz. F~cilities typically consist o~: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennu that send ~he wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS tells). Transceivers ire typicafly connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelenlth o~ PCS services, the antermas require I~e-oLsite paths for good prop~ation, and ire typiclll), installed · distance above groufld level. Ant~--mas are c~nstructed to concentrate enerl), towards the horizon, with is ~ ener~ u possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined wit~ the iow power o~ PCS facilities, leneral~ results in no pmsibitity for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (HPL~) leve~s, with the exception of in irea$ kl the immediate vicinity of the ifltermas. MPE limits do not represent levels where I health risk exists, since ~hey ire designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of slfety for iii persons, re~l~rdless of a~e, gender, size or I~ikh. LII3345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Comoliance Repor~ 9245 Main Road. East Mark~. New York t 1~)3~) 2, SITE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project site includes three (3) proposed T-LVJobile wireless telecommunication antermas (at three sector locations) on a fl~g pole located at ~)245 Main Road in East Marion, New York. Table I contains an antenna inventory and a summary of exposure iflformation. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers cd' exposure limits that are based upon occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general population/uncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public that may be exposed to antenna beJds. Access to this site is considered controlled. Additional informatkm regardiflI co~troHed and uncontrolled exposure Iknits is provided in Appendix A. Appendix B presaflu a site safety plan that provides a plan view of the flal pole with antenna locations. Site plans are also provided in Appem:~x D. According to information provided to EBI, AT&T is present on the ~af pole and Verizon is proposed for future insullation on the flq pole. Also there are four whip aflterwm located on the flq pole that are the Fire Departments. These other carriers were also incltKJed in the mode~ analysis usinI assumed parameters based on EBI's prior experience with these carriers. Table I contains modeling information for all carriers at this site. Appendix B presents · site sketch indicating antenna locations. EBI U I3345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Comotiance Report 9245 Main Road. East Marion. New York I 1~39 3. RESULTS OF RF EME MODELING EBt has performed theoretical modelinI usin1 Roofview~ and/or TowerCalc~ and to estimate the maximum potential power density from each antenna based oe worst-cate assumptions for the number of antennas and power. The modelinI is based on worst-case assumptions for the number of T-Plobile antennas and power, including a maximum I-I-I radio co~uratio~ for GSM sectors A, B and C, with a power level of 54.1 dbM (257.1watts) per transmitter, and a I-I-I radio contiluration for U~TS Sectors A, B, and C, with a power level of 4&.3 dl~ (42.9 watU) per transmitter, in order to provide a wont-case evaluation of predicted MPE levels. The assumptions used in the modelinI for T-I'~d~e's antennas are based upon virtual antenna specifications, ioformetion provided by T-Mobile and information ~athered from other sources. An input power of 300 wat~ was assumed for each T- Plobile antenna in order to satisfy local requirements. ~ is the maximum input power shown on the manufacturer's antenna speche~ation sheet. The parameters used for modelinI T-Mobile antennas are summarized in the modelinI export files presented i~ Appendix C. AT&T, Verizon, and the Fire Department also have antennas located on the riaI pole. Information about these antennas was included in the modelinI analysis. Plodel numbers for these antennas with exception of the Fire Department antennas were unspecified and as such, the assuml~ons u~ed in the modelinI of other carrier antennas are based upon a set of virtual antenna specif~etions developed by EBI based on industry standards. The parameters used for modelinI of other carrier antennas are also summarized in the modelk~ export files presented i~ Appendix C. As presented in the "Electrom~netic Enerly Safety Plan," included in Appendix B, the worst-case power density will not exceed the FCC's occupational or ~enerel population limits on any accessible Iroun&level walkinI or workir~ surface. However, for elevated workers in front of the antenna faces, power densities may exceed the occupational limit 75 feet above the Iround or 9 feet below the bottoms of the T-Mobile antennas. Table I outlines the predicted extents of the area below the antenna that exceed the occupational and leneral population llmtt~. Additionally, there are no predicted exceedances of the FCC's lenaral populetion or occupational PiPE limits at ground in front of the other carrier antennas at this site. Table I outlines the predicted extents of the areas in front of each of the other carrier antennas that exceed the occupational and leneral population limits. For a person at ground level, the maximum ambient RF exposure level from the T- Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, and Fire Department equipment is caicu~ated to be 0.013 mW/cm~, which is equivalent to 6.50% of the general population exposure limit. EBI LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Comoliance Report ¢)245 Main Road. East lelario~. New York I 1~3¢~ 4. MITIGATION/SITE CONTROL OPTIONS EBrs modelin~ indicates that there are no areas on the walkit~ working surfaces at ground-level in front of the T-Mobile antennas that may exceed the FCC standards for general population exposure. All exposures above the FCC's safe limits require that indivi~dals be elevated above the grou~l. Workers should not be elevated i~ front of the antennas unless the wireless equipment is shut down and Iockout/l~c~t procedures implemented in accordence with T-t4obife standard operat~ protocols. In order to alert any such elevated workers, an "NOC" si&m, red "Climber Waminl" si~, and a "Notice to Workers" si~n is recommended for installation at the base of the fla~ pole as depicted on the Electrom~netic Ener~ Si&q~a~e Iqan - Al~endix B. These protocols and recommended control measures have been summarized and included with a graphic representation of the antennas and associated silage and control areas in a RF-EME ~ Safety Plan, which is included as Appendix B. Individuals and workers accessin~ the ~ pole should be provided · copy of the attached Site Safety Plan, made aware of the posted si~n, and silnify their understandin~ of the Site Safety Ptan. EBI LII3345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road. East Marion. New York 11939 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS EBI I~s prepared a Radiofrequency Emissions Compliance Report for telecommunications equipment installed at Site #LII3345A, located at 9245 Main Road, in East Flarion, New York. EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from T-Mobile antennas and other carriers' antennas to determine worst-case predicted RF-EME exposure levels from wireless communications equipment installed at this site. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modelinI in relation to relevant Federal Commutations Commission (FCC) RF-EME comidiance standards for ~ human exposure to RF-EME fields. As presented i~ the preceding sections, based o~ the FCC criteria, there are no areas in front of T- Mobile's antennas on any welkinI or workir~ surface that exceed the FCC standards for leneral population or occupational exposure. Workers at this site may safeb/access the fl~ pole, but should not be elevated above the Iround level unless the wireless equipment is shut down end IockoutJta~out procedures are implemented. Recommended control measures are outlined within a Site Safety Plan (attached); this plan includes proceWdres to shut down and IockoutJtaSout this wireless equipment in accordance with T-Mobile's standard operet~ protocol. 8 EBI LII3345A - East Marion Fire Departmem RF-EME Comoliance Reonrt 9245 Plain Road. East Marion. New York 11939 6. LIMITATIONS This Rep0n was prepared for the use of T-Mobile, Inc. k was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the ume locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the client. The observations in this Repo~ are valid on the date of the investi~atkm. Ar~ additional information that becomes available concerning the Subject Property should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, i~ necessary. This Repe~ has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal both of which are integral parts of this Report No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. EBI ' LII3345A - East Markm Fire Del~-m~nt RF-EFIE Comoliance Reoort 924S Main Road. East Marion. New Yo~k 1191~1 7. REFERENCES Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Oflr~ce of Er~ineerin~ & Technololy (OET). ~ Comoiiance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofr_~_,__.~nc~ Electr _oma~mm~ Fields. OET Bulletin &S, Edition 97-01. Aulust 1997. FCC. QuestJons and Answers about Biok~ical Effecu ~nd Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromalnetic Fields Fourth Edition, Aulust 1999; (OET B~dlletin Richard Tell Associates, Inc., ~. Version 3.5. October 10, 2002. Richard Tell Associates, Inc., ~ User Guide. Version 4.15. Febr~aary 10, 2003. I0 EBI LII3345A- East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Comoliance Report 9245 Main Road. East Marion. New York 11939 Table I: Antenna FJount and Exposure Detail T-MOBILE MPE ~ General Occupaeeml T-Mobile Antenna Base Azimu~ Anten~ Exceedance Exceed~ce Sec~o~ He~ Above H~nt (fee~) (~) At (Ut4TS) 30 ~4 ~s~e Flal~de ~ Al (GSFI) 30 ~4 Inside Fla~lxde e~ NA BI (UMTS) 150 ~4 Inside Fblpole ~ NA BI (GS~I) 150 ~4 Inltde Fla~0~le 9 NA C I (UMTS) 270 ~4 Inside Flagpole ~ NA C I (GSM) 27O ~4 k~s~e Fblpofe t HA OTHER CARRIEI~ Sector ! ~) Ground Mount (feet) V'ZN Al 30 S7.5 inside Fb~o4e NA NA VZN BI IS0 ~7.5 inside Fla~de NA NA VZN CI 270 t7.5 Inside Fb&~de NA ATT Al 30 104.5 Inside Flag. de NA NA ATT BI 150 104.5 i~si~e ~ NA NA ATT C I 270 104.5 inside r-~pole NA NA Fire Department Omni 23.7 Side of Flalpole NA VVhip Fire Department Omni 27.7 Side of Flalpole NA NA VVhip Antenna Fire Department Omni 27.5 Side of FLI~J~e NA Whip Antenn~ Fire Departmen~ Omni 110 Top of Fl~j~ole NA NA Whip Antenna II EBI UI3345A - E~st Plarion Fire Department RF-EME Comoliance Reoort 9245 Hain Road. Eut Marion. New Ym'k 11939 APPENDIX A: REGULATORY AND MODELING INFORMATION 12 EBI LII334SA - East Marion Fire Department RF-EPIE Comofiance Reoort 9245 Main Road. East t'tark~. New York 11939 Calculation of Near Field and Far Field Power Density Near Field Prediction methods have been developed from the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip (omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications cedi sites. The near Reid zone is defined by distance, D, from an antenna beyond which the manufacturer's published, far field antenna patterns will be fully formed; the near field may exist for increasing D until some or alt of three conditions have been met: whcrc h 2h2 I) D>-~- 2) D>Sh aperture height of dm antgnrm, in meters, mM wavelength of the transmitted signal, in meters. 3) D > The FCC Offke of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (OET 65 - A,.alust 1997) g~ea this formula for calculating power density in the near field zone about an individual RF source: power density S -- Ig0 0.1 x Pm ~ x xx Dx h ' inmW/m12' where ~w = hall-power be~mwid~ of .ntenna~ in degrees, amd PM -- net power input to thc antenna, in watts. The factor of 0.1 in the numerator converts to the desired urns of power density. This formula has been bulk into the RoofView~) program (described in the RF-EME Modefi~ Plethodcdoly section, below) that calculates FCC public and occu~tional Emits. Far Field OET 65 gives the following formula for calculating power density in the far field of an ir~llvidual RF source: power density S = 2.56 x I.&4 x 100 x RFF2 x ERP 4 x x x D2 , in mW/cra2, where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts, RFF = relative f'~id factor at the direcli0~ to the actual point ofcalculation, and D = distance from the center of radiation to the point ofcalculation, in meters. The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, a~suming a reflection coeff~lent of 1.6 (I.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a held-wave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been buik into TowerCalc~. U 13345A - East Markm Fire Department RF-EPIE Comoliance Reoort 9245 Main Road. East Mario~ New York 11939 Regulatory Background The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires all Federal alencles to evaluate the effects of their actions on the quality of the human environmenL One of several environmental factors addressed by these requirements is human exposure to RF enerly emitted by FCC-regulated transmitters and facilities. The FCC revised and updated their RF exposure guidelines on August I, 1996, as a result of a rule- making proceeding initiated in 1991. The new guidelines incorporate limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (PIPE) in terms of electric and magnetic f~eld stren~:h and power dec, try for transmitters operating at frequencies between 0.3 MHz and 100,000 MHz. knldemenution of the new guidelines for mobile and portable devices became effective August 7, 199~. ~ FCC's F1PE limits are based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSi guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure Iknits that are based ulaon occupat- ional/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general popoletion/uncontrotled exposure limits for members of the general public. OccuJ~tlefloi/cefltrolled exposure /~m/t~ apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a resuk of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made ftdly aware of the pomntlal for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate Gonerel fm~uletloflluncontrolled exposure ~imlts apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area. Table I and Figure I (below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, sunv~rize the PIPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial marlin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility, and are "time-averaged" limits to reflect different duratiom resukit~ from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. LI 13345A - East Markm Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Repol~ 924S Main Road. East Marion. New York 11939 Table 1. LIXHTS FOR MAXIMI~I PER3 flSSIBLE EXPOSURE (NIPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposum~e Frequency Electric Field Magnetic Field Powet Density Averaging Tune ~auz) (V/m) (A,"m) (mW/cma) (hUm)les) 0.3-3.0 614 163 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/te)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 .... f/300 6 1 $00-100,000 .... 5 6 (B) Limit~ for General PopulationfUncontroikd Expo~m'e Fr~luency EleCtric Field Magnetic Field Powet Density Averaging Tm~ strength (E) Streagth (h3 (S) El", IHI: or S ('~IZ) 0,'/m) (/L."m) (mW/cml) (nlmutes) 0.3-1.34 614 1 63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824ff 2.19/f (l$~te)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300.1500 .... filS00 30 1 $00-100,000 .... 1.0 30 f = fiequencT m l~lz *Plane-wave eqmvalem powet density NOTE 1: Otc#tuitional~controlled hmits apply m situations m whach persc~s are exposed as a consequence of their emplo>anent l~ovided those persons are full5' aw~e of the potential for exposure and can exercise control ovet their exposure. LmUts for ocCUpai~onal/controlk, d ~ also apply m situations when an indixidual is transient through a location whete occupational/controUed limits apply provided he or she is made aware of lhe potential for exposure. NOTE 2: Generalpopnlation/nncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the g~etal public ma), be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be full.5, aware of the potennal for exposure or can not exetcise coutrol over their exposuze. I$ EBI U 13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Comoliance Report 9245 t~ai~ Road. East Marion. New York 11939 1. 0.1 I 0.~ 03 FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane-wave Equivalent Power Density ~ Occupational/Controlled Exposure - General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure I3 30 300 13,ooo 30,000 1.300,000 L34 1,500 100,000 Frequency (MHz) Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: Personal Wireless Service ~ ~dd~GlL~ ~ Personal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/em2 1.00 mW/cma Celkdar Telephone 870 MHz 2.90 mW/cma 0.58 mW/cma Specialized Mobile Radio 855 MHz 2.85 mW/cm~ 0.57 mW/cm2 Most Restrictive Freq, Range 30-300 MHz 1.0O mW/crn~ 0.20 mW/cm2 MPE limits do not represent levels where a heakh risk exists, since they are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, resardless of a~e, gender, size or health. For this project, the anticipated frequency range in which the antennas will operate is 1710-2155 MHz. For modeling purposes, EBI utilized a broadcast frequency of 1710 MHz. EBI " U I3345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-Ei~E Comoliance Report 9245 ~lain Road. East Marion. New York 11939 RF-EME Modeling Methodology EBI assesses the RF impacts of the proposed equipment and other wireless carders through the use of TowerCalc~ and RoofView~ software models to predict worst-case RF exposure t'mkls due to antennas at this site. TowerCaic~ and RoofView~ are widely-used predictive modeling programs that have been developed by Richard Tell Associates to predict both near ~qd and far r~ld RF power density values for telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the cellular, PCS, pagir~ and other communications services. The model utilizes several operational specifications for different types of antennas to prockdce a plot of spetially-avera~ed power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicalde exposure limit. The calculations utilized by this program are summarized in Appendix A~ For this report, EBI utilized worst-case antenna and power data, and compared the resultant worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupationat/controlled exposure limits outJined in OET Bulletin &$. (NOTE: F_B/retained Rk~zrd Te~ Associates to provue technical support services to ensure that medeting end the resu//a~ corr~d~e evotumion for this s/re ~s fu~ consistent w/th FCC req~rements). TowerCalc~ and RoofView~ calculate RF near-field levels from selected antennas by appl~ a model that takes into account parameters such as the antenna's aperture height, azimuthal beam width for directional antennas and the location of the antennas relative to workers at this site. Resulting spatially averaged power densities are expressed as a percent~e of a user selectable exposure limit depending on frequency. U I3345A - East lelarion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Hain Road. East Harion. New Ygrk 119]~ APPENDIX B: RF-EPIE SAFETY PLAN EBI Consulting ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY SAFETY PLAN ~~ Sector A Sector C 270' ANTENNA PLAN ELEVATION VIEW Modelin~ indicates that the worst-case power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit in front of the antennas approximately 75 feet above Iround level or 9 feet below the bottoms of the antennas as indicated in the elevation view. TOWER RE EME ANTENNA INFORMATION AND EXPOSURE CONTROL AREAS Note: In order for this plato to accurately Imrtray restricted are~ it must be reprinted in co~r only. T-PlobiJe uses theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from each antenna. The transmitter power output used in the model is based on a I-I-I (GSM) and I-I-I (LIPITS) radio configuration for Sectors A. B and C. The FCC recognizes that these theoretical models over-estimate the actual exposure one would experience and generally considers the resuJtt to represent a worst-case exposure scenario. F1P~ limits are design, ed to provide a substantial margin of safety and do not represent levels where a health r~sk exists. Individuals accessing the tower should signify their understanding of the three exposure control areas on this plan and the actions necessa~ to control their exposure to RF energy. Information regarding other carrier antennas is provided w~thin the RF-EME Compliance Report. Electromagnetic Energy Safety Plan T-Nobile Site Name: East Marion Fire Department T-Iqobile Site N umbe~. LI 13345A East Marion, New York 11939 ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY SIGN PLAN Sector C :?_- L ....... ~- .............. Sector A ................. i_,qW- O' 10' 20' 30' EQUIPMENT COMPOUND VI~ SIGNAGE INSTRUCTIONS $1ln Imi~e Description Pesttn Securely I~nt ~te ~ ~ of the strucmce (mmched I Ca~ M ' NOC to the Jase ef the ItJj pole) u ir~tcated i~ t~e -- ~-- Jnforma6onal siIn, used to pro.de T-Flobile siJml~ ptlfl. -,- emerler~ contact i~formatio~ for the site Denote Site ID Numt~ o~ Si~ i~ Permane~ ,"~- i~Ltrker =~T~'~- Notice Te Wm'kecs i ~ecurely me, mt aj~r~ximateJy 4~ tnche~ abo~e -=~-'~.:' I~form~lio~l siJ~. used to not~ worker~ that jrade at the I~se of tower as indicated in t~e sijn~e - ; ~- __ ~g~t~n~s for worki~ in RF L ~j~! ~-I12" x I t ", u~l m ,~rt individuals ~hat the ,round level at the ba~e d ~e ~wer. power demRy en e~eYated workir~ surfaces in Der, ore Site ID Number on Siln in Permanent Note: In order ~)r this ldan t~ accurately lmrtr~)' re~trkted areas tt/rm~ lie riqarrmtMI M C~ ~. PLAN DEVELOPED BY EBI CONSULTING BASED UPON BASE PLAN PREPARED BY MAXTON TECHNOLOGY INC.. BAY STATE DESIGN INC. DATED 09-25-09. Electromajnetic Enerjy Safety Plan F&e~T Operate. T.~lobae T-I~#e Site N~ne: East PiaHo~ Fire ~nt LII3345A - East Marion Fire Dep~rtmont RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 ffain Ro~d. East I~ario~. New York I leJ39 APPENDIX C: MODELING EXPORT FILES Consulting ON ON, ON* ON. ON, ON* ON. UI3345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Comoliance Reoort 9245 Plain Road. East Mario~ New York 114)39 APPENDIX D: SITE PLANS EBI Consultin8 T-Mobile Mobile Northeast LLC ~o.~s~ 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY, SUITE D-203 ~xr°u GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SITE TYPE: COLOCATION ON EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE APPROVAL REVIEW FORM VICINITY MAP ~ ~,,~,~ ;HEET INDEX PROJECT SUMMARY % DIRECTIONS , ~ ~ ~.~.~ .............. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES ABBREVIATIONS .......... T-Mobile ............................................ ,~ ........... Northeast LLC .... ~""~ ~ '~' ....... ~ ............ ELECTRICAL DESIGN CRITERIA NOTES ~"~"~ ...... / .... ~ ...... ~~ ~MBOLS AND MATERIALS OENE~L SITE NOTES 9 srTE PL~4 9 T-Mobile Northeast LLC A-1 T-Mobile Northeast LLC LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT A-2 ICE BRIDGE DETAIL T-Mobile Northeast LLC LI 13 545A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSTRUCTION DETAILS A 3 T-Mobile Northeast LLC DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT & CONSTRUCTION A 4 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST RI: SYSTEM ~;CHEDULE , I I ~41NI~4UU WINI~UM CABLE T-Mobile Northeast LLC SUBMITTALS LI 15 EAST MARION FIRE E)EPARTM[NT tSCHEDULE, BILL OF MATERIALS & ROLITIN( SCHEMATIC T-Mobile Northeast LLC £ 1 GROUNDING NOTES T-Mobile Northeast LLC LI 13-345A ~o...~ ~.-.. ~:~ ~ :-2 Radio Frequency - Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report Prepared for: T-Mobile USA C/O Maxton Technology 50 Eastman Street South Easton, MA 02375 Site # LII3345A East Marion Fire Department 9245 Main Road East Marion, New York I 1939 EBI CONSUl. TING Creating, Value for Your Business EBI Project No. 6209199 I September 30, 2009 LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 TABLE OF CONTENTS I:XECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 J. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. SITE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 5 3. RESULTS OF RF EME MODELING ............................................................................................................................. 6 4. MITIGATION/SITE CONTROL OPTIONS ................................................................................................................. 7 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................. 8 6. LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................................................................................. 9 7. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................................. I 0 TABLE I TABLES ANTENNA I~OUNT AND EXPOSURE DETAIL APPENDICES APPENDIX A RF-EME MODELING DATA APPENDIX B RADIO FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (RF-EME) SAFETY PLAN APPENDIXC I~IODELING EXPORT FILES APPENDIXD SITE PLANS EBI Consulting LII3345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compl_i_ance Repo~ 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting or EBI) has been contracted by T-Mobile to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for T-Mobile Site #LII3345A at 9245 Main Road in East Marion, New York to determine worst-case predicted RF-EME exposure levels from wireless communications equipment installed at this site. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant Federal Communications Commission (FCC) RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields. This document addresses the compliance of T- Mobile's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site. As presented in the sections below, based on worst-case theoretical modeling, there are no areas in front of the T-Mobile antennas on any walking su~fface that exceed the FCC standards for general population and occupational exposure. However, there are areas where workers elevated above the ground may be exposed to power densities greater than the general population and occupational limits. EBI LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Repor~ 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 I. JNTRODUCTION Radio frequency waves are electromagnetic waves from the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum at frequencies lower- than visible light and microwaves. The wavelengths of radio waves range from thousands of meters to around 30 centimeters. These wavelengths correspond to frequencies as Iow as 3 cycles per seconds (or hertz [Hz]) to as high as one gigaher~(z (one billion cycles per second). Personal Cornmunication (PCS) facilities used by T-Mobile in this area operate within a frequency range of 1710-2155 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for- good propagation, and are typically installed a distance above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the Iow power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of in areas in the immediate vionity of the antennas. MPE limits do not represent levels where a health risk exists, since they are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size or health. EBI LII3345A East Marion Fire Department RF-EI"IE Complianc~ ~R_ej~orr 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 2. SITE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project site includes three (3) proposed T-~lobile wireless telecommunication antennas (at three sector locations) on a flag pole located at 9245, I~lain Road in East Marion, New York. Table I contains an antenna inventot~/and a summary of exposure information. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupational/controlled exposure limits (for' workers) and general population/uncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public that may be exposed to antenna fields. Access to this site is considered controlled. Additional information regarding controlled and uncontrolled exposure limits is provided in Appendix A. Appendix B presents a site safety plan that provides a plan view of the flag pole with antenna locations. Site plans are also provided in Appendix D. According to information provided to EBI, AT&T is present on the flag pole and Verizon is proposed for future installation on the flag pole. These other carriers were also included in the modeling analysis using assumed parameters based on EBI's prior- experience with these carriers. Table I contains modeling information for all carriers at this site. There are also three whip antennas located on the flag pole that are the Fire Departments. These antennas were not modeled as a part of this analysis since frequency and power data was not made available as of the date of this report. Appendix E contains photos depicting the locations of installed signage that were taken during the site visit. Appendix B presents a site sketch indicating antenna locations. EBI LII3345A - East Marion Fire Depam~ent RF EME Compliance R~ep~_ . 9245 Main Road, East Marion. New York 11939 3. RESULTS OF RF EME MODELING EBI has performed theoretical modeling using Roofview~ and/or TowerCalc® and to estimate the maximum potential power density from each antenna based on worst-case assumptions for the number of antennas and power. The modeling is based on worst-case assumptions for the number of T-Mobile antennas and power, including a maximum I-I-I radio configuration for GSM sectors A, B and C. with a power level of 54.1 dbM (257.1watts) per transmitter, and a I-I-I radio configuration for UMTS Sectors A, B, and C, with a power level of 46.3 dbM (42.9 watts) per transmitter, in order to provide a worst-case evaluation of predicted MPE levels. The assumptions used in the modeling for T-Mobile's antennas are based upon virtual antenna specifications, information provided by T-Mobile and information gathered from other sources. An input power of 300 watts was assumed for each T- Mobile antennas in order to satisfy local requirements. This is the maximum input power shown on the manufacturer's antenna specification sheet· The parameters used for modeling T-Mobile antennas are summarized in the modeling export files presented in Appendix C. AT&T and Verizon also have antennas located on the flag:~6 e. Information about these antennas was included in the modeling analysis. Model numbers for these antennas were unspecified and as such, the assumptions used in the modeling of other carrier antennas are based upon a set of virtuat antenna specifications developed by EBI based on industry standards. The parameters used for modeling of other carrier antennas are also summarized in the modeling export files presented in Appendix C. There were also three Fire Department whip antennas on site that could not be modeled due to a lack of information· As presented in the "Electrornagnetic Energy Safety Plan," included in Appendix B, the worst-case power density will not exceed the FCC's occupational or general population limits on any accessible ground-level walking or working surface. However, for elevated workers in front of the antenna faces. power densities may exceed the occupational limit 75 feet above the ground or 9 feet below the bottoms of the T-Mobile antennas. Table I outlines the predicted extents of the area below the antenna that exceed the occupational and general population limits· Additionally. there are no predicted exceedances of the FCC's general population or occupational MPE limits at ground in front of the other carrier antennas at this site· Table I outlines the predicted extents of the areas in front of each of the other carrier antennas that exceed the occupational and general population limits. For a person at ground level, the maximum ambient RF exposure level from the Tb Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon equipment is calculated to be 0.034 rnW/cm2, which is equivalent to 6.00% of the general population exposure limit. LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME CompJiance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 4. J~JlTIGATION/SITE CONTROL OPTIONS EBI's modeling indicates that there are no areas on the walking working surfaces at ground-level in front of the T-Mobile antennas that may exceed the FCC standards for general population exposure. All exposures above the FCC's safe limits require that individuals be elevated above the ground. Workers should not be elevated in front of the antennas unless the wireless equipment is shut down and Iockout~tagout procedures implemented In accordance with T-Mobile standard operating protocols. In order to alert any such elevated workers, an "NOC" sign, red "Climber Warning" sign, and a "Notice to Workers" sign is recommended for installation at the base of the flag pole as depicted on the Electromagnetic Energy Signage Plan - Appendix B, These protocols and recommended control measures have been summarized and included with a graphic representation of the antennas and associated signage and control areas in a RF-EME Site Safety Plan, which is included as Appendix B. Individuals and workers accessing the flag pole should be provided a copy of the attached Site Safety Plan, made aware of the posted sign, and signify their understanding of the Site Safety Plan EBI LII3345A- East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Complian~ce Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 S. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS EBI has prepared a Radiofrequency Emissions Compliance Report for telecommunications equipment installed at Site #LII3345A, located at 9245 Main Road, in East Marion, New York. EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from T-Mobile antennas and other carriers' antennas to determine worst-case predicted RF-EME exposure levels from wireless communications equipment installed at this site. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant Federal Comrnunications Commission (FCC) RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields. As presented in the preceding sections, based on the FCC criteria, there are no areas in front of T- Mobile's antennas on any walking or working surface that exceed the FCC standards for general population or occupational exposure. Workers at this site may safely access the flag pole, but should not be elevated above the ground level unless the wireless equiprnent is shut down and lockout/ragout procedures are implemented. Recommended control measures are outlined within a Site Safety Plan (attached); this plan includes procedures to shut down and IockoutJtagout this wireless equipment in accordance with T-Mobile's standard operating protocol, EBI LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 6. LIMITATIONS This Report was prepared for the use of T-Mobile, Inc. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the client. The observations in this Repor~ are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the Subject Property should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This Report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this Report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. EBI 9 Ll13345A- East Marion Fire Department RF-EME ComR!LaD_c_e~_o~ 9245 Main Road~ East Marion, New York 11939 7. REFERENCES Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Office of Engineering & Technology (OET). Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-0 I. August 1997. FCC. Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Fourth Edition, August 1999; (OET Bulletin 56). Richard Tell Associates, Inc., TowerCalc User Guide. Version 3.5. October I 0, 2002. Richard Tell Associates, Inc., RoofView® User Guide. Version 4.15. Februm~' I 0, 2003. EBI LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road. East Marion, New York I t939 Table I: Antenna Mount and Exposure Detail Al (UMTS) 30 84 Inside Flagpole 9 NA Al (GSM) 30 84 Inside Flagpole 9 NA B I (UMTS) ~50 84 Inside Fbgpole 9 NA 84 CI (GSM) 270 84 9 NA VZN Al VZN BI VZN C I AT'FBI 30 97.5 Inside Flagpole NA NA 150 270 3O 150 97.S 97.5 104.5 Inside FlagpoJe Inside Flagpole Inside Fbgpole Inside Flagpole NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ATI- C I 270 J04.5 Inside Flagpole NA NA Fire Department Unknown Approximately 23 Side of Flag NA NA Whip Antenn~ Pole Fire Department Unknown Approximately 23 Side of Flag NA NA Whip Antenna Pole II LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 APPENDIX A: REGULATORY AND MODELING INFORMATION EBI /2 LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 Calculation of Near Field and Far Field Power Density Near Field Prediction methods have been developed from the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip (omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications cell sites. The near field zone is defined by distance, D, from an antenna beyond which the manufacturer's published, far field antenna patterns will be fully formed; the near field may exist for increasing D until some or all of three conditions have been met: 1) D>~-~ 2) D>5h 3) D> 1.6k where h = aperture height or,he antenna, in meters, and k = wavelength of the transmitted signal, in meters. The FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (OET 65 - August 1997) gives this formula for calculating power density in the near field zone about an individual RF source: 180 0. t x Pnet power density S = ~ x in mWlcrn2, ;~xDxh' where 0nw = half-power beamwidth of antenna, in degrees, and Pnet= net power input to thc antenna, in watts. The factor of 0. l in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into the RoofView® program (described in the RF-EME Modeling Methodology section, below) that calculates FCC public and occupational limits. Far Field OET 65 gives the following formula for' calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF power density S -''~ ~,:56 x 1.64 x 100 x RFF2 x ERP 4 x ~: x D2 in mW/ri.02. where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatt~ RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D TM dislance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a reflection coefficient of 1.6 (I.6 x 1.6 : 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half-wave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into TowerCalc®. EBI 13 LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 Regulatory Background The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires all Federal agencies to evaluate the effects of their actions on the quality of the human environment. One of several environmental factors addressed by these requirements is human exposure to RF energy emitted by FCC-regulated transmitters and facilities. The FCC revised and updated their RF exposure guidelines on August I, 1996, as a result of a rule- making proceeding initiated in 1993. The new guidelines incorporate limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) in terms of electric and magnetic field strength and power density for transmitters operating at frequencies between 0.3 MHz and 100,000 MHz. implementation of the new guidelines for mobile and portable devices became effective August 7, 1996. The FCC's MPE limits are based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupat- ional/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general population/uncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area. Table I and Figure I(below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility, and are "time-averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. EBI 14 LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York I I939 Table 1. LIMITS FOR .XLAXEXRrM PE1LMISSIBLE EXPOSL2R.E (MPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Frequency Electric Field .Magnetic Field Power Densl~~ Averaging Tune iLange Stren~h (E) Strength (H) ($) E]2, IH[2 or S (MHz) (V/nO (Am) (mW/cra2) (minutes) 03-3.0 614 1 63 (100)* 6 · n 8c 30 30 1842/£ 4.$9:T (900.:£-) 6 30-300 61 4 0.163 L0 6 300 1500 £~300 6 1500-100.000 5 6 (B) Limits for General Polmlalion,,'l;ncontrolled Exposure Frequency Elecuic Field Magnetic Field Powex Demlty Avera~mng Tm~e Range Stren~h (E) Styen~h (H) (S) E[-~, IHI'- or S (MHz) (V:'m) (,&:m) (m\~,L cm2) (nm'lutes) 0.3-1 34 614 1 63 (100)* 30 1 34 30 824~f 2.19, f (180/F)* 30 30 300 27 5 0 073 0.2 30 300-1500 fl500 30 1500 100.000 1 0 30 f=frequency in MHz *Plane wave eqmvalent power derzsiW NOTE 1: OccupationaFcontrolted hmtts apply in sinmttons m wluch persons are exposed as a consequence of then- employment provided those persons are fitllv aware of the potential for expos'me and can exercise control over theLr exposure Lmms for occt~ationaFcontrolled exposure also apply m situations xxq~en an mdwidual is tr:mslent through a locanon where occupational/controlled lumts apply provided he or she is ma& aware of the potential for exposure NOTE 2: Geueralpolmlation/unco.trolled exposttres apply m situations in which the general public may be exposed, m m Much persons that are exposed as a conseqtence of therr employment may not be fully awvae of the potential for exposxue or can not exercise control over thea exposure EBI 15 LII3345A- East Marion Fire Depapcment RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 1,000 ~ 0 O~ I 003 03 FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane wave Equivalent Power Density l~_ _ Occupational/Controlled Exposure General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure 1 34 L500 I00:000 Frequency (MHz) Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: Personal Wireless Service Approx, Frequency Personal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz Cellular Telephone 870 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio 855 MHz Most Restrictive Freq, Range 30-300 MHz Occupational Limit Public Limit 5.00 mW/cm: 2.90 mW/cm: 2.85 mW/em2 1.00 mW/cm: 1.00 mW/cm: 0.58 mW/cm: 0.57 mW/cml 0.20 mW/cml MPE limits do not represent levels where a health risk exists, since they are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size or health. For this project, the anticipated frequency range in which the antennas will operate is 1710-2155 MHz. For modeling purposes, EBI utilized a broadcast frequency of 1710 MHz. EBI /6 LI13345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 RF-EME Modeling Methodology EBI assesses the RF impacts of the proposed equipment and other wireless carriers through the use of TowerCalc® and RoofView~ software models to predict worst-case RF exposure fields due to antennas at this site. TowerCalc® and RoofView~ are widely-used predictive modeling programs that have been developed by Richard Tell Associates to predict both near field and far field RF power density values for telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the cellular, PCS, paging and other communications services. The model utilizes several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially-averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit. The calculations utilized by this program are summarized in Appendix A. For this report, EBI utilized worst-case antenna and power data. and compared the resultant worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65, (NOTE: EBI retained Richard Tell Associates to provide technical support services to ensure that modeling and the resultant compliance evaluation for this site is fully consistent with FCC requirements). TowerCalc® and RoofView® calculate RF near-field levels from selected antennas by applying a model that takes into account parameters such as the antenna's aperture height, azimuthal beam width for directional antennas and the location of the antennas relative to workers at this site. Resulting spatially averaged power densities are expressed as a percentage of a user selectable exposure limit depending on frequency. /7 LI13345A East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York I 1939 APPENDIX B: RF-EME SAFETY PLAN EBI Consulting ELEVATION VIEW ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY SAFETY PLAN Sector B 150° ANTENNA PLAN Modeling indicates that the worst-case power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit in front of the antennas approximately 75 feet above ground tevel or 9 feet below the bottoms of the antennas as indicated in the elevation wew, TOWER RF EME ANTENNA INFORMATION AND EXPOSURE CONTROL AREAS Procedures: Network Operations Center: 888-218-6664 (toll-Free) Site ID # UI334SA T-Mobile Sector/ Al (UMTS) 30 AI(GSM) BI (UMT$) BI (GSM) CI(UMTS) CI(GSM) Azimuth (o) Nearest Walkjn~gSurface [f~ 84 30 84 [50 84 150 84 270 84 270 84 Antenna Mount Inside Flagpole Inside Fl,~gpo[e Inside Flagpole Inside Flagpole MPE Exceedance (feet below antenna) 9 9 Inside Flagpole 9 Inside Flagpole 9 T-Mobile uses theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density fi'om e,3ch antenna The transm]ttel- power output used in thc model is based on a I-I-I (GSM) and I I I (UMTS) r~d]o configuration for- Sectors A, B and C The FCC recognizes that these theoretical models over-estimate the actual exposure one would experience and generally considers the lesults to represent a worst-case exposure scenalio. MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety and do not replesent levels where a health risk exists Individuals accessing the tower shourd signify their understanding of the three exposure control areas on Electromagnetic Energy Safety Plan Facility Operator: T-Mobile T-Mobile Site Name: East Marion Fire Depa~cmen~ T-Mobile Site Number: Ll13345A Location: 9245 Main Road East Marion New York 11939 Date: 09/30/09 Rev. 0 EBI ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY SIGN PLAN tat ' ' ' ~* ' "'Il i .............. ! II Sector A I Sector B 0 10' 2fi' EQUIPMENT COMPOUND VIEW SIGNAGE INSTRUCTIONS Flag Pole Sign Image Description 141~8~21 s-eee4 NOt Informational sign, used to provide T-Mobile emergency conbnct information for- the site Notice To Workers Informational sign, used to notify workers that there are active antennas installed and provide guidelines for working in RF environments Red Warning Sign 8-1/2" x I I". used to alert individuals that the power density on elevated working surfaces in h-ont of antennas may exceed the FCC's maximum permissible limit for occupational exposure Posting Instructions Securely post \to the base of the structure (attached to the base of the flag pole) as indicated in the signage plan Denote Site ID Number on Sign in Permanent Marker Securely mount approximately 48 inches above grade at the base of tower as indicated in the signage plan Securely mount approximately 48 inches above ground level at the base of the tower. Denote Site ID Number on Sign in Permanent Marker Note: In order for this plan to accurately portray restricted areas it must be reprinted in color only. PLAN DEVELOPED BY EBI CONSULTING BASED UPON BASE PLAN PREPARED BY MAXTON TECHNOLOGY INC., BAY STATE DESIGN INC DATED 09-25-09. Electromagnetic Energy Safety Plan Faohty Operator: T Mob e T-Mobile Site Name: East Marion Fi~e Dep,~tmenr T-Mobile Site Number: LI13345A Location: 9245 Main Road East Marion NewYork 11939 Date: 09/30/09 Rev. 0 LII3345A - East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Rep_os 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 APPENDIX C: MODELING EXPORT FILES EBI Consulting Map, Settings, Antenna, and Symbol Data Table. Exported from workbook -> RoofView 4.15.xls Done on 9/29/2009 at 11:55:34 AM. Use this format to prepare other data sets for the RoofView workbook file. ~'ou may use as many rows in this TOP header as you wish The critical point are the cells in COLUMN ONE that read "Start...' (ag StartMapDefinition) If used, these (4) headers are required to be spelled exactly, as one word {ag. StartMapDeflnitlonl The very next row will be considered the start of that data block. The first row of the data block can be a header (as shown below}, but this is optional. When building a text file for import, Add the Map info first, then the Antenna data, followed by the symbol data. All rows above the first marker line 'Start. ' will be ignored, no matter how many there are This area is for you use for documentation End Of help comments. fou can place as much text here as you wish as long as you don't place it below :he Star~ Map Definition row below the blue llne. insert more rows using the Insert menu. ihould you need additional lines to document your project, simply insert additional rows ~y highl+ghting the row number adjacent to the blue line below and then clicking on the Insert menu and selecting rows. Roof Max '~ Roof Max > Map Max ~ Map Max ~ Y offset X offset Number of envelope Mfg Model X RFS WV-16DW'~ 35 RFS WV-16OW\ 35 Y Z Type 36 84 vc 36 84 VC 35 84 VC 35 84 VC 35 84 VC 35 84 VC 36 975 VC 36 97.5 VC 35 97,5 VC 36 104.5 VC 36 104 5 VC 35 104 5 VC SU$~7~:$CL$210 {f) dBd BWdth Uptime ON Aper Gain Pt Dir Profile flag 5 16 65;30 ON. Tower and Antenna Data Table .. Exported from workbook -> TowerCalc 3 5.xls Done on g/29/2009 at 11:4fi:31 AM Use this format to prepare other data sets for the Towerview workbook file. You may use as many rows in this TOP header as you wish The critical point is the cells in COLUMN ONE that read *Start...' (ag. StartTowerDefinition} These (2) headers are required to be spelled exactly, as one word (eg St ar tTower Definition) The very next row will be considered the start of the data e data section can be a header (as shown below), but this is optional When building a workbook file for import, Add the Tower info first, then the Antenna data All rows above the first marker line 'Start,,.' will be ignored, no matter how many there are you use for documentation. End of help comments. You can place as much text here as you wish as long as you don't place it below th e Start Tower Definition row below the blue line. You may insert more rows using the Inse~t menu. Should you need additional lines to document your proJect, simply insert additional rows by highlighting the row number adjacent to the blue line below and then clicking on the Inset[ menu and selecting rows StartTowerDefinition Starting Ht Ending Ht Tower Ht NOt used Y Not used Not used (ft) dBd BWdth Type Aper Gain Theta 5 16 65;0 5 16 65;0 5 16 65;max 5 16 6S;max 5 16 6S;max S 16 65;max ON flag ON, ON· ON· ON' ONo ON· LII3345A- East Marion Fire Department RF-EME Compliance Report 9245 Main Road, East Marion, New York 11939 APPENDIX D: SITE PLANS EBI Consulting T-Mobile T Mobile Northeast LLC NortheastLLC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY, SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SITE TYPE: COLOCATION ON EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE APPROVAL REVIEW FORM VICINITY MAP ~ .,,~ SHEET INDEX PROJECT SUMMARY DIRECTIONS ...... ,.,~,o~oo~.~ ............. , ..... DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES ABBREVIATIONS ........... T-Mobile ................................................................... Northeast LLC ............. ~.~X/ ............. ~ .................... ELECTRICAL DESIGN CRITERIA NOTES .... ~,.~,~.,,.~,~/ .... ~ ~,'-.,,,,,o~,-.,.~ ............ ~,,~,~.,,~..,.~.-~ SYMBOLS AND MATERIALS -~ ........... ~.o :~ ....... ~'~= ELECTRICAL WIRING CRITERIA NOTES GENERAL SITE NOTES ................. ~'0"''~ ~ T-Mobile Northeast LLC T-Mobile Northeast LLC SUOMI~IALS LI 13-345A EAST MAR[ON FiRE DEPARTMENT MOUN~]NG POLE DETAIL GPS ANTENNA DETAIL TO T-Mobile Northeast LLC LI 13 345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT DETAILS T-Mobile No.east LLC I ONE LINE DIAGRAM T-Mobile Northeast LLC SUBMll~ALS DEPARTMENT GROUNDING RISER GROUNDING NOTES GROUNDING NOTES T-Mobile ~,.~ ........... .~.~ ~ Northeast LLC ~o,0,, ~,-,, ~ ... 0 at&t Glynn Walker AT&T Mobility 5405 Windward Pkwy. Alpharetta, GA 36004 (770) 708-6122 GPD ASSOCIATES Kevin Clements 520 South Main St., Suite 2531 Akron, Ohio 44311 (330) 572-2195 kclements@gpdgmup.com GPD~ 2009263.69 May 15, 2009 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT AT&T DESIGNATION: Site USID: 48290 Site FA #: 10107550 Site Name: WEST ORIENT POINT T-MOBILE DESIGNATION: Site Name: East Marion Site Number: LI13345 ANALYSIS CRITERIA: Codes: SITE DATA: Mr. Walker, TIA/EIA-222-F & 2003 IBC 85-mph with 0" ice 74-mph with 1/2" ice 9395 Main Rd., East Marion, New York 11939, Suffolk County Latitude 41 ° 7' 48.396"N, Longitude 72° 20' 23.567"W 109' PennSemmit Flagpole GPD is pleased to submit this Structural Analysis Report to determine the structural integrity of the aforementioned tower. The purpose of the analysis is to determine the suitability of the tower with the addition of the following propnsed loading configuration: Elev. 87' (3) TMBXX-6516-R2M Antennas, Pipe Mounted, inside the existing shroud w/(12) 7/8" internal coax (3) Andrew ETW190VS12UB Tower Mounted Amplifiers inside the shroud (3) RFS/Cciwave ATMAA1412D.1A20 Tower Mounted Amplifiers inside the shroud Based on our analysis we have determined the designs of the tower and its foundation are sufficient for the proposed, existing, and reserved loadings as referenced in Appendix A. We at GPD appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and AT&T. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, ~ / David B. Grain 520 South Main Street. Suite 2531 . Akron, Ohio 44311 . 330-572-2100. Fax 330-572-2101 . www. GPDGroup.com Glau$ Pyle Schomer Burns and DeHav~n, Inc Akron. Cleveland. Columbus. Indianapolis, 109 Ft Monopole Tower - Structural Evaluation AT&T USID: 48290 SUMMARY & RESULTS The purpose of this analysis was to verify whether the existing structure is capable of carrying the proposed loading configuration as specified by T-Mobile to AT&T. This report was commissioned by Mr. Glynn Walker of AT&T. TOWER SUMMARY AND RESULTS Member Capacity Results Monopole 30,6% Pass Base Plate 70.4% Pass Anchor Rods 45.1% Pass Foundation I 32.8% I Pass Nme: Two foundation designs were available. Because the as-built design was not available, both were anal' the controlling capacity is shown= zed and ANALYSIS METHOD RISA Tower (Version 5.3.0.1), a commercially available software program, was used to create a three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate primary member stresses for various dead, live, wind, and ice load cases. Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix B. The following table details the information provided to complete this structural analysis. This analysis is solely based on this information and being provided without the benefit of a site visit. DOCUMENTS PROVIDED Document Remarks ~ Preliminary Tower Summary T. Mobile Co-location document Siterra Site Lease Application T-Mobile Application, dated 3/13/09 Siterra Original Tower Drawings Paul J. Ford Job #: 29207-0158, Siterra dated 11/16/07 Foundation Drawings Paul J. Ford Job #: 29207-0158, Siterra dated 1/3/08 5/1512009 Page 2 of 4 109 Ft Monopole Towe~ - Structural Evaluation AT&T U$1D: 48290 ASSUMPTIONS This structural analysis is based on the theoretical capacity of the members and is not a condition assessment of the monopole. This analysis is from information supplied, and therefore, its results are based on and are as accurate as that supplied data. GPD has made no independent determination, nor is it required to, of its accuracy. The following assumptions were made for this structural analysis. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The monopole shaft sizes and shape are considered accurate as supplied. The material grade is as per data supplied and/or as assumed and as stated in the materials section. The antenna configuration is as supplied and/or as modeled in the analysis. It is assumed to be complete and accurate. All antennas, mounts, coax and waveguides am assumed to be properly installed and supported as per manufacturer requirements Some assumptions am made regarding antennas and mount sizes and their projected areas based on best interpretation of data supplied and of best knowledge of antenna type and industry practice. All mounts, if applicable, are considered adequate to support the loading. No actual analysis of the mount(s) is performed. This analysis is limited to analyzing the tower only. The soil parameters are as par data supplied or as assumed and stated in the calculations. If no data is available, the foundation system is not verified. The tower and structures have been properly maintained in accordance with TIA Standards and/or with manufacturer's specifications. All welds and connections am assumed to develop at least the member capacity, unless determined otherwise and explicitly stated in this report. Tower Mounted Amplifiers am assumed to be installed behind antennas. All existing loading was obtained from the provided preliminary tower summary and is assumed to be accurate. The size and material properties of the 40' mast pipe were assumed for analysis purposes only. All proposed coax is assumed to be internal to the monopole. If any of these assumptions am not valid or have been made in error, this analysis may be affected, and GPD Associates should be allowed to review any new information to determine its effect on the structural integrity of the tower. 5/15/Z009 Page 3 of 4 109 Ft Monopole Tower - Structural Evaluation AT&T USID: 48290 DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES GPD ASSOCIATES has not performed a site visit to the tower to verify the member sizes or antenna/coax loading. If the existing conditions are not as represented on the tower elevation contained in this report, we should be contacted immediately to evaluate the significance of the discrepancy. This is not a condition assessment of the tower or foundation. This report docs not replace a full tower inspection. The tower and foundations are assumed to have been properly fabricated, erected, maintained, in good condition, twist free, and plumb. The engineering services rendered by GPD ASSOCIATES in connection with this Structural Analysis am limited to a computer analysis of the tower structure and theoretical capacity of its main structural members. All tower components have been assumed to only resist dead loads when no other loads are applied. No allowance was made for any damaged, bent, missing, loose, or rusted members (above and below ground). No allowance was made for loose bolts or cracked welds. GPD ASSOCIATES does not analyze the fabrication of the structure (including welding). It is not possible to have all the veT detailed information needed to perform a thorough analysis of eve~J structural sub-component and connection of an existing tower. GPD ASSOCIATES provides a limited scope of service in that we cannot verify the adequacy of eve~ weld, plate connection deteil, etc. The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility of adding appurtenances usually accompanied by transmission lines to the structure. It is the owner's responsibility to determine the amount of ice accumulation, if any, that should be considered in the structural analysis. The attached sketches are a schematic representation of the analyzed tower. If any material is fabricated from these sketches, the contractor shall be responsible for field verifying the existing conditions, proper fit, and clearance in the field. Any mentions of structural modifications are reasonable estimates and should not be used as a precise construction document. Precise modification drawings are obtainable from GPD ASSOCIATES, but are beyond the scope of this report. Miscellaneous items such as antenna mounts, etc. have not been designed or detailed as a part of our work. We recommend that material of adequate size and strength be pumhased from a reputable tower manufacturer. GPD ASSOCIATES makes no warranties, expressed and/or implied in connection with this report and disclaims any liability arising from material, fabrication, and erection of this tower. GPD ASSOCIATES will not be responsible whatsoever for, or on account of, consequential or incidental damages sustained by any person, firm, or organization as a result of any data or conclusions contained in this report. The maximum liability of GPD ASSOCIATES pursuant to this report will be limited to the total fee received for preparation of this report. 5/15/2009 Page 4 of 4 109 Ft Monopole ~'ow~r - Structural Evaluation AT&T USID: 48290 APPENDIX A Tower Analysis Summary Form 5/15/2009 Tower Analysis Summary Form Site Name WEST ORIENT POINT Site Number 48290 FA Number i0~ ~r~50 ~o~t~A ~p~ ;~; ............... The information contained in this summary report is not to be used independently from the PE stamped tower analysis. Design Parametem Existing / Reset, ed Loading Proposed Loading Future Loading Anlen na Owner M°unt An lenna He~ht Irt) CL (fi) Manufacturer 109 Ft Monopole Tower - Structural Evaluation AT&T USID: 48290 APPENDIX B RISA Tower Output File 5115/2009 RISA Tower J°b ..go 48290 WEST ORIENT POINT 1 of 2 GPD ~J$$ociate$ Project Date 520 South Main St. Suite 2531 2009263.69 13:50:57 05/15~09 Akron. OH 44311 Client Designed by Phone; (330) 572-2100 AT&T mimiller FAX: (330) 572-2101 Tower Input Data There is a pole section. This tower is designed using the TIA/EIA-222-F standard. The following design criteria apply: Tower is located in Suffolk County, New York. Basic wind speed of 85 mph. Nominal ice thickness of 0.5000 in. Ice density of 56 pcf. A wind speed of 74 mph is used in combination with ice. Temperature drop of 50 °F. Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 50 mph. A non-linear (P-delta) analysis was used. Pressures are calculated at each section. Stress ratio used in pole design is 1.333. Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feedline supports, and appurtenance mounts are not considered. Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area Description Face Allow Component Placement Total C~/~A Weight or ShieM Type Number LDF1-50A (1/4 FOAM) A No Inside Pole 107.00 - 8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.06 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.06 LDFS-50A (7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 87.00 - 8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.33 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.33 Discrete Tower Loads Description Face Offset Offsets: ~imuth Placement C. dA C. MA Weight or Type Hotz Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Fert fi fi ft2 fi2 K f~ 40' x 30" stealth cylinder C None 0.0000 89.00 No Ice 43.27 43.27 3.92 1/2" Ice 43.27 43.27 4.69 800 10121 w/mount pipe A From Leg 0.50 0.0000 107.00 No Ice 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 800 10121 w/mount pipe B From Leg 0.50 0.0000 107.00 Nolce 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 800 10121 w/mount pipe C From Leg 0.50 0.0000 107.00 No Ice 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 (2) ETM 190G-12UB A From Leg 0.50 0.0000 107.00 No Ice 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 (2) ETMIg0G-12UB B From Leg 0.50 0.0000 107.00 Nolte 0.00 0.00 0.02 RISA Tower 48290 WEST ORIENT POINT 2 of 2 GPD Associates Project Date 520 South Main St. Suite 2531 2009263.69 13:50:57 05/15/09 Akron, 0H44311 Client Designed by Phone: (330) 572-2100 AT&T mimiller FAX: (330) 572-2101 Description Face Offset O~ets: Azimuth Placement C/Ax C~4~ Weight or Type Horz Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Vert ft fi fr' fl2 K 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 (2) ETM190G-12UB C From Leg 0.50 0.0000 107.00 No Ice 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ A From Leg 0.50 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.00 0.00 0,06 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 0.12 TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ B From Leg 0.50 30.0000 90.00 Nolce 0.00 0.00 0.06 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0,00 0.12 -3.00 TMBXX~516-R2M w/ C From Leg 0.50 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.00 0.00 0.06 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 0.12 ETW190VSI2UB A From Leg 0.50 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00 0.02 Section Capacity Table Section Elevation Component Size Critical P SF*Pa~o.. % Pass No. fl Type Element K K Capacity Fail L1 109-70 Pole TP8xSxl.25 1 -8.06 1377.34 28.8 Pass L2 70-69 Pole TP30xSx1.25 2 -8.19 1377.34 28.8 Pass L3 69 - 18 Pole TP37.14x30x0.2818 3 -13.16 1682.65 19.8 Pass L4 18 - 0 Pole TP39.223x35.9115x0.25 4 -16.08 1580.84 30.6 Pass Summary Pole (LA) 30.6 Pass RATING = 30.6 Pass 109 Ft Monopole Tower - Structural Evaluation AT&T USID: 48290 APPENDIX C Tower Elevation Drawing 5/15/2009 DESIGNED/~,°PUR'f~-N.a~ICE LOADING GRADE Fy Fu Fu I TOWER DESIGN NOTES 1. Tower is located in Suffolk County, New York. 2. Tower designed for a 85 mph basic wind in accordance witfl the TIA~E~-222-F Standard. 3. Tower is also desi~:lned for a 74 mdb basic wind with 0.50 in ice. 4. Deflections are based upon a 50 mph wind. 5. TOWER RATING: 70.4% 18oft AX/AL 19K GPD G'~OL~F GPD Associates ~o~: 48290 WEST ORIENT POINT ~i~. 520 South Main St. Suite 2531 *'r°~:=OO~aa.~ I Akron, OH 44311 I!!cr"~r~ AT&T Iora~'bY:mimiller IApp'd: I Phone: (330) 572-21 O0 /e: TIA~EIA-222-F Date: 05/1~ Sca~: NTS FAX: (330) 572-2101 Feedline Distribution Chart 0' - 109' Face A 109.00 000 Face B Face C 000 <FD G~;OL'F GPD ~ssociates ~°b= 48290 WEST ORIENT POINT -,~,.. 520 South Main St. Suite 2531 Jpr~: 2009263.69 Akron OH 44311 ~cl~: AT&T D~ ~: mimill ~one: (330) 572-2100 IT~E~-~2-F ID":0~l~ Is"~: NTSI F~: (3~) 572-2101 IP~: N~ ~ST ~ ~ ~ N° E-7~ Feedline Plan Round 1~12) LDF1-50A (1/4 FOAM) LDFS-1~7/8 FOAM~ GPD Associates ~ 48290 WEST ORIENT POINT 520 South Main St. Suite 2531 IPr°~a Akron, OH 4431 1 Ic~A~T [°~iller ~']: I Phone: (330) 572-2100 f~: {330) 572-2101 IPa~ .:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m E-7I 109 Ft Monopole Tower - Sb'uctural Evaluation AT&T U$1D: 48Z90 APPENDIX D Base Plate & Anchor Rod Analysis 5/15/2009 Anchor Rod and Base Plate Stresses 48290 WEST ORIENT POINT 2009263.69 Overturning Moment = Axial Force = Shear Force = 376.,__~ k*ft I '~s._...~ k I 7,00Jk I Anchor Rods Pole Diameter = 39,223 n Number of Rods = 4 Type = Upset Ro~ Rod Yield Strength (Fy) = 7~ ~si Rod Circle = 4.c n Rod Diameter = 2.2.~ ~n Net Tensile Area = 3.25 in2 Max Tension on Rod = 87.98 kips Max Compression on Rod = 95.98 kips Allow. Rod Force = 195.00 kips Anchor Rod Capacit~ = 45.1% OK Base Plate Plate Strength (Fy) = 50 ksi Plate Thickness = 2 ~n Plate Width = 44 ~n Est Dist b/wea Rod= 6in w~lc = 20.00 ~n Wm~× = 23.002 ~n w = 20.00 ~n S = 13.33 in3 fo = 35.19 ksi Fb = 50 ksi Base Plate Capacity = 70.4% OK GPD Unstiflened Square Base Plate Stress (Rev F) - V2 02 109 Ft Monopole Tower - Structural Evaluation AT&T USID: 48290 APPENDIX E Foundation Analysis 5/15/2009 PAD & PIER DESIGN - Monopole 48290 WEST ORIENT POINT TOWER REACTIONS total overtuming moment = 376 Kip-fl total shear = 6 Kip axial = 7 Kip ground water table = Below fl PAD DIMENSIONS width = 18 fi height = 6 ft depth of conc= 2 fl LOAD PERPENDICULAR TO PAD QM~N= P/A-M/S= LOAD AT 45 DEGREES TO PAD Q~N= P/A-M/S= MX = 339.411 My = 339411 ex = 1.375 ey = 1.375 ex/C/ = 0.076 ok (e/W < 1/6) ex/W = 0.076 ok (e/W < 1/6) h~ght depth of conc..I Sprea'dsheat Input IPCAMATS 'nP;t ~ 3.00 1.95 ok (width/6 > M/P Vedf~ max pre~sure in PCAMATS for this load case IF err > 1/6 Q~L = 1046,4 kips Qu~x = 382.25 kips QMAx/Q~LL = 36.5% OK width 28.2% IF M/P>wldthl6 Qmax= 1295 ks¢ Qmin = 0.000 ksf B~ = 22.87 L~ = 22.87 32,4% OK Page 1 of 1 5/15/2009 IF°""daa°" cap~i~y: I 32,4% OK I CAISSON Version 4.46 Fri May 15 13:54:22 2009 U.W. Short Course - 1998 ~ PIER FOUNDATIONS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN - (C) 1995, POWER LINE SYSTEMS, INC.* ANALYSIS IDENTIFICATION : 48290 WEST ORIENT POINT NOTES : 2009263.69 (INPUT LOADS ARE FACORED FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PIER) PIER PROPERTIES CONCRETE STRENGTH (ksi) = DIAMETER (ft) = 6.000 3.00 STEEL STRENGTH (ksi) = 60.00 DISTANCE FROM TOP OF PIER TO GROUND LEVEL (ft) = 0.50 SOIL PROPERTIES LAYER TYPE THICKNESS DEPTH AT TOP OF LAYER DENSITY CU KP PHI (ft) (ft) (pcf) (psf) (degrees) 1 C 4.00 0.00 100.0 0.0 2 S 29.00 4.00 100.0 3.000 30.00 DESIGN (FACTORED) LOADS AT TOP OF PIER MOMENT (ft-k) = 1492.0 VERTICAL (k) = 64.7 SHEAR (k) = 26.6 ~LDDITIONAL SAFETY FACTOR AGAINST SOIL FAILURE = 1.54 CALCULATED PIER LENGTH {ft) = 19.000 CHECK OF SOILS PROPERTIES AND ULTIMATE RESISTING FORCES ALONG PIER TYPE TOP OF LAYER BELOW TOP OF PIER THICKNESS DENSITY CU KP FORCE ARM (ft) (ft) (pcf) (psf) (k) (ft) c 0.50 4.00 100.0 0.0 0.00 2.50 S 4.50 9.67 100.0 3.000 461.22 10.22 S 14.17 4.83 100.0 3.000 -419.65 16.71 SHEAR AND MOMENTS ALONG PIER WITH THE ADDITIONAL SAFETY FACTOR WITHOUT ADDITIONAL SAFETY FACTOR DISTANCE BELOW TOP OF PIER (ft) SHEAR (k) MOMENT (ft-k) SHEAR (k) MOMENT (ft-k) 0.00 41.6 2298.5 27.0 1492.5 1.90 41.6 2377.4 27.0 1543.8 3.80 41.6 2456.4 27.0 1595.1 5.70 11.8 2518.3 7.6 1635.3 7.60 -51.3 2483.8 -33.3 1612.9 9.50 -133.9 2310.9 -87.0 1500.6 11.40 -236.0 1962.6 -153.3 1274.4 13.30 -357.6 1401.7 -232.2 910.2 15.20 -340.6 671.9 -221.2 436.3 17.10 -180.1 174.1 -116.9 113.1 19.00 -0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 U.W. Short Course - 1998 Page 1/2 ~+* TOTAL REINFORCEMENT ECT = 0.30 REINFORCEMENT AREA (in^2) = 12.21 ~** USABLE AXLAL CAP. (k) = 64,7 USABLE MOMENT CAP. (ft-k) = 1762.0 US Standard Re-Bars (Select one of the following): 62 BARS #4 (AREA = 0.20 in^2 40 BARS #5 (AREA = 0.31 in^2 28 BARS #6 (AREA = 0.44 in^2 21 BA~S #7 (AREA = 0.60 in^2 16 BAJ~S #8 (AREA = 0.79 in^2 13 BARS #9 (AREA = 1.00 in^2 10 BARS #10 (AREA = 1,27 in^2 8 BARS #11 (AREA = 1.56 in^2 6 BARS #14 (AREA = 2.25 in^2 DIA = 0.500 in) AT SPACING (in) = 3.14 DIA = 0.625 in) AT SPACING (in) = 4.87 DIA = 0.750 in) AT SPACING (in) = 6.96 DIA = 0.875 in) AT SPACING (in) = 9.28 DIA = 1.000 in) AT SPACING (in) = 12.17 DIA = 1.128 in) AT SPACING (in) = 14.98 DIA = 1.270 in) AT SPACING (in) = 19.48 DIA = 1.410 in) AT SPACING (in) = 24.35 DIA = 1.693 in) AT SPACING (in) = 32.46 PRESSURE UNDER CAISSON DUE TO DESIGN AXIAL LOAD (psf) = 2288.3 U.W. Short Course - 1998 Page 2/2 , ULS License - PCS Broadb icense - KNLF982 - T-Mobile License Page 1 of 2 ULS License PCS Broadband License - KNLF982 - T-Mobile License LLC Call Sign KNLF982 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband Status Active Auth Type Regular Iqarket Market BTA321 - New York, NY Channel Block O Submarket 0 Associated 001865.0000000a- Frequencies 001870.00000000 (MHz) 001945.00000000- 001950.00000000 Dates Grant 06/05/2007 Expiration 06/27/2017 Effective 06/05/2007 Cancellation Buildout Deadlines 1st 06/27/2002 2nd Notification Dates 1st 04/01/1999 2nd Licensee FRN 0001565449 Licensee T-Mobile License LLC 12920 SE 38th St. Bellevue, WA 98006 ATTN Dan Menser Type Limited Uability Company P:(425)378-4000 E:dan.menser@t-mobile.com ? Contact T-Mobile License LLC 12920 SE 38th St. Bellevue, WA 98006 A'FTN Dan Menser iP: (425)378-4000 E: dan.menser@t-mobile.com Ownership and Qualifications Radio Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier interconnected Yes Alien Ownership is the applicant a foreign government or the representative of No any foreign government? is the applicant an allen or the representative of an alien? No Is the applicant a corporation organized under the laws of any No foreign government? ]s the applicant a corporation of which more than one-fifth of No http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UIsSearch/license jsp;JSESSIONID_ULSSEARCH=HQG... 8/31/2009 "' ,ULS License - PCS Broadba~License - KNLF982 - T-Mobile License Page 2 of 2 the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a I'oreig n country? Is the applicant directly or indirectly controlled by any other Yes corporation of which mere than one-fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country? If the answer to the above question is 'Yes', has the applicant received a ruling(s) under Section 3~.0(b)(4) of the Communications Act with respect to the same radio service involved in this application? Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits. Demographics Race Ethnicity Gender http://wire~ess2~£cc~g~v/U~sApp/U~sSearch/~icense~sp;JSESS~~N~D-ULSSEARCH=HQG~~~ 8/31/2009 Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION 13 LICENSEE: T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC ATTN: DAN MENSER T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC 12920 SE 38TH STREET BELLEVUE, WA 98006 FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0001565449 Call Sign File Number KNLF202 0003918702 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband Grant Date 01-18-2005 Effective Date 07 -31-2009 ExpiratiOn Date 12-14-2014 Print Date 08-01-2009 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator MTA001 A 13 Market Name New York 1st Build-Out Date 2nd Build-Out Date 3rd Build-Out Date 4th Build-Out Date 12-14-1999 12-14-2004 Waivers/Conditions: NONE Conditions: Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the Station nor any right in the nse of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shale be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, See 47 U,S.C. §606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license, rel~r to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System (ULS). To view the license record, go to the ULS homepage at http://wireless, fcc,gov/uls/inden.htm?job=home and select "License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601 -MB Page I of 1 April 2009 Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Radio Station Authorization Page 1 of 2 169 LICENSEE NAME: T-Mobile ~lcense LLC DAN MENSER T-MOB[LE LICENSE LLC 12920 SE 38TH STREET BELLEVUE WA 98006 FCC Regi~rafion Number (FRN) OOCI565449 Call Sign WQGB263 Fi~ Number 0002769270 Radio Service Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-29-2006 11-29 -2006 I 1-29 -2021 11-30-2OO6 Channel Block Sub-Mcrket Designator Market Number O Market Name: New YoPK. NY-Nd/Nassau-S Jr:folk 1st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date Srd Build-out Date SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS 4th Build-out Date Conditions: Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communicatians Act ct 19,34, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any fight in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred In violation at the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. Section 310(d). This license is subject in terms te the right of use ar control conferred by Section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934. as amended. See 47 U.S.C. Section 606, To view the geographic areas associated with the license, go te the Universal Licensing System (ULS) homepage at http://wireless.foc.gov/ub and select "License Search". Fallow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601 - MB February 2006 Licensee Name: T-Mobile License LLC Call Sign WOGB263 Page 2 of 2 File Number PHnt Date 0002769270 t 1 - 30-2006 the Department of duatice (DOd) and the Federal Bureau o lnvestdgatlon (FBI), which addresses FCC 601 - MB FAA 2-C SURVEY CERTIFICATION Applicant: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC 3500 Sunrise Highway Suite D-203 Great River, NY 11739 Site Name: Site Number: Site Address: East Marion Fire Department L1 13-345A 9245 Main Road East Marion, New York 11939 Horizontal Datum: [] Ground survey [] GPS survey Vertical Datum Source: NAVD 1988 AMSL [] GPS survey Structure Type: [] New Tower [] Existing Tower [] Roof Top [] Water Tank [] Smokestack [] Other Latitude: Longitude: Site Base Elevation: Top Existing Unipole: Center of Proposed Antennas: 41°07'41.83'' NAD 83 72020'28.79', NAD 83 37' (GROUND) AMSL 110' AGL (147' AMSL) 87' AGL (124' AMSL) CERTIFICATION: I certify that the latitude of 41°07'41.83" and the longitude of 72°20'28.79" are accurate to within +/- 50 feet horizontally, and that the site elevation of 37 feet AMSL is accurate to within +/- 20 feet vertically. The horizontal datum (coordinates) are based on the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) and are expressed in degrees, minutes and seconds to the nearest hundredth of a second. The vertical datum (heights) are based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) and are determined to the nearest foot. Company: Lawson Surveying and Ma 16-18 Reynolds Ave. Oneonta, New York Surveyor Signature/Seal: Robert J. Lawson, L.S., N.Y.S, lc. No. 050086 Date: September 8, 2009 PUBLIC AIRPORTS IN PROXIMITY OF CASE File: LI13345A OVERALL ELEVATION (AMSL) : LATITUDE: 41° 07' 41.8" LONGITUDE: 72° 20' 28.79" 147 FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 HTO AIR EAST HAMPTON 158.19 10.907 +92 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a) (1) or 77.i3(a)(2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Conununication facilities. You are 65141 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 41 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. This airport has both Circling and Straight In Instrument Procedures. Please review published US Terminal (TERPS®) Approach Procedures for this landing facility. DNE 77.13{a) (4) Straight-In Criteria HTO Category 'D' Circling Approach Area extends 3.78 NM from each runway. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 21N AIR MATTITUCK 223.62 11.671 +117 YES This facility does not have a runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a)(1) or 77.13(a)(2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 70315 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 22 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. This facility has a circling approach procedure. Circling procedures have a Straight-In segment. The site can be out of the circling approach area and still be in the straight in approach segment. Please review published US Terminal Procedures for this landing facility to determine what impact (if any) this site has on the procedure(s) and/or airport. DNE 77.13(a} {4) Straight-In Criteria 21N Category 'A' Circling Area extends 1.30 NM from all runways. Category 'B' Circling Area extends 1.84 NM from all runways. Category 'C' Circling Area extends 2.89 NM from all runways. Category 'D' Circling Area extends 3.78 NM from all runways. Category 'E' Circling Area extends 4.73 NM from all runways. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 0B8 AIR ELIZABETH FIELD 62.14 15.852 +138 YES This facility does not have a runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a) (1) or 77.13(a} (2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 95355 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 7 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. No Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 SNC AIR CHESTER 334.15 17.04 269 YES This facility does not have a runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a)(1) or 77.13(a)(2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 65141 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 41 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. NO Circling or Straight-In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. No Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 87N HEL SOUTHAMPTON 198.25 17.749 +142 YES Your structure DOES NOT EXCEED FAR 77.13(a)(2) Notice Criteria for this heliport. You are not locating within 5,000 feet of facility. You are beyond limit by: 102844.7 feet. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME TO FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 GON AIR GROTON NEW LONDON 47.86 18.064 +138 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a) (1) or 77.13(a) (2} Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. AS a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 70315 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 22 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. NO Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME TO FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 MTP AIR MONTAUK 99.4 19.326 +141 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a)(1) or 77.13(a)(2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. AS a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 65141 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 41 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. NO Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME TO FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 42B AIR GOODSPEED 344.84 19.715 +138 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a) (1) or 77.13{a) (2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 70315 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 22 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. No Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 FOK AIR FRANCIS S GABRESKI 217.61 21.574 +80 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a) (1) or 77.13(a) (2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 70315 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 22 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight-In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. NO Expected TERPS® impact. THE NEAREST AIRPORT TO CASE COORDINATES IS: HTO EAST HAMPTON is an Airport type landing facility and is associated with the city of EAST HAMPTON, NY. The facility is eligible for Study under FAR Part 77 sub-Part C. Its Reference Point (ARP} elevation is: 55 feet AMSL and you are locating 66271 feet from this landing facility. Airspace® Version 2009.9 AIRSPACE® and TERPS® are registered ® trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace® Copyright © 1989 - 2009 09-17 2009 11:43:43 The mathematical algorithms used by this program are derived directly from Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77, sub part C. BAY STATE DESIGN November 3,2009 Nr. Nick White Maxton Technology, Inc. 3500 Sunrise Highway, Suite D203 Great River, NY 11739 Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC Acoustic Considerations: LI 13-345A 9345 Main Road East Moriches, NY SCTM: 1000-31-3-11.31 Dear Mr. White: The cabinets planned for the proposed T-Mobile installation are; the Nortel S12000 outdoor model, Magnateck SpecU-um MPE5566 Battery Back-up, Ericsson PPC Box, Booster Cabinet, and Ericsson PBS 3106 UMTS Base Station Cabinet. The built-in air conditioning systems in these cabinets do produce some noise. Manufacturer's specifications list the maximum combined acoustic output for these cabinets as 68 dB at one meter form the units. (Note that most often, the air condition systems for these cabinets are not expected to be running simultaneously.) The equipment is to be installed within an equipment compound bounded by a chain link fence on all sides. Additionally, the equipment asea will be sma'ounded by 28 ten foot tall Eastern Red Cedar Trees. The nearest residential property line is approximately 81 feet away. At this distance from the source of the sound, the noise level will have attenuated to less than 45dB. The noise levels will be even lower at residence~ located further away from the source of sound. As a frame of reference, OSHA.gov provides the following indications of typical acceptable noise levels: ,, 50 dB Quiet Office · 40 dB Bedroom The Town of Southold Code, at Section 280-7 lA (2) (a) (ii) (4), requires that the "noise from the Base Equipment, including any backup generator, measures less than 45dB at the nearest property line of all adjacent residences." There is no generator proposed, and as noted above, the noise level at the nearest adjacent property line will be less than 45dB. We therefore conclude that the noise output of the proposed installalion will not be objectionable, and will satisfy the applicable code requirement. Sincerely yours, Trichor Venkataraman, P.E. Bay State Design, Inc. Bay State Design, Inc, 241 Boston Post Road West Marlborough, MA 01752 Tel. (508) 229-4100 Fax (508) 485-5231 www. BayStateDesign.com p.3 t1932;~51§ E G~c 7 I! ~ AH '9~ CLE~X ~F ~ ~.,}~D~ I '~ 8'"~ ~, I , '; ' · , , I~.~ ~/~'~1 }-~'.~,' I~.~c_ ,.'~ / '~'~'~,~/,/7¢~ · ~'l, I~'.'r I~*.''' ",*~1 Payer ~mc u R a R~ ~' ~ ~'~ 1 1 ~/~ _. (ortrdl~qt~ ;{ Suffolk Cuunt~ Recordin~ & Endorsement Page_. / PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the application of proposal of T-Mobile Northeast LLC For Special Exception Permit Approval to collocate public utility wireless telecommunications antennas within an existing pole and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Road East Marion, New York 11939 District I000, Section 3 i, Block 3, Lot 11.31 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) AFFIDAVIT OF RADIO FREQUENCY ENGINEER MARIANA NIETO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer for T-Mobile Northeast LLC (hereinafter "T-Mobile"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in wireless telecommunications networks and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy these service deficiencies. I am fully familiar with T-Mobile's wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit ttds affidavit in support of T-Mobile's proposal to install a wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. T-Mobile proposes to install public utility wireless telecommun/cations antennas within the existing monopole at the premises and imtall related equipment on the ground adjacent thereto, as depicted in the plans submitted to the Board. 3. T-Mobile is considered a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of New York and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to serve the public on Long Island and throughout much of the United States. T-Mobile strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage areas. 4. At present, there is a substantial service gap in T-Mobile's wireless telephone coverage in the vicinity of the Premises. A service gap exists if the user of a T-Mobile mobile telephone cannot reliably transmit, receive or maintain a voice or data connection. The service gap in coverage that now exists in the vicinity of the proposed site prevents T-Mobile from providing reliable service in the area. This unreliability represents an inconvenience to users of T-Mobile's services and can have serious consequences during times of emergency or disaster. 5. In order to understand why the proposed antenna site is needed, it is necessary to understand how T-Mobile's system works from an engineering standpoint. T-Mobile's wireless telecommunications system is designed so that Iow powered base stations are strategically located at determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. Due to such factors as hills, valleys, trees, buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves, each coverage area or "cell" is irregularly shaped. These coverage areas, therefore, have some overlap to ensure "seamless" coverage. With some overlap and sufficient signal strength from each base station, the T-Mobile user can move through these cells and reliably transmit, receive or maintain voice or data connections. Each facility is engineered to cover a limited area so that an antenna facility will cover only the area surrounding it but will not interfere with other sites in the system. 6. T-Mobile performs signal propagation studies to determine the height and location of the needed ceil site. Based on its studies, T-Mobile determined that an antenna facility would have to be established within a narrowly defined search area. In this case, we determined that the installation of the proposed facility will allow T-Mobile to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 7. The proposed antennas must be affLxed at least as high as those depicted on the plans previously submitted to the Board in order to ensure that reliable service can be afforded to T-Mobile users in the vicinity of the site. The location and height of the antennas is determined by some or all of the following factors: availability of existing structures, drive test data, location of existing antenna sites in the area, topography in the surrounding area, land cover features in the area such as buildings and foliage, and the results provided by computer propagation software that enables radio frequency engineers to predict the anticipated signal propagation at a given height and location. 8. In order to illustrate the effect that the proposed site would have on coverage in its vicinity, propagation maps have been prepared demonstrating the different coverage levels summarized above. The maps depict the area to be served by the proposed site. As the maps indicate, the proposed facility is of vital importance to T-Mobile's efforts to establish a wireless telecommunications network and provide reliable service to the area in question. Unless this application is granted, T-Mobile will be unable to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 9. Mark Cosgrove, the National Director of Radio Frequency Engineering for T-Mobile bas previously prepared in in-depth explanation of T-Mobile's design standards and criteria in the form of an Affidavit, prepared on January 23, 2006 ("Cosgrove Affidavit"). 10. I have reviewed the Cosgrove Affidavit, which is attached hereto, and am in agreement with all of its contents. 11. In addition, the antenaas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service or public safety telecommunications in the surrounding area. Sworn to before me this [~q/X day of 15~, 2009. No. 01 D06211094 Qualffied In SuHOl~ coun~ commission Expkes septembe~ 05,201S ~A~To Radio Frequency Engineer In the matter of OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Affidavit State of New Jersey County of Morris ) ) SS: ) MARK COSGROVE, being duly sworn, does depose and say: 1. I am a national Director of Radio Frequency Engineering for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (the "Applicant" or "Omnipoint"). I submit this affidavit in support of the application by Omnipoint for approval for the installation of a wireless communication public mility facility ("Facility"). 2. I am a qualified radio frequency engineer. I have been trained to identify gaps in reliable service in wireless communications systems and to assess the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy gaps in signal coverage. I have extensive train/ng and experience with respect to Omnipoint's wireless system and technology, as detailed by my curriculum vitae, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 3. I have 15 years experience designing, implementing and operating wireless networks, specifically Global System for Mobile communications technology (:'GSM") based networks. 6SM technology is a second generation digital technology originally developed for use in Europe and which is now used by more than seventy-one percent (71%) of the world market. GSM technology is, therefore, a very common mobile technology. 4. The purpose of this affidavit is to establish the technical and scientific basis for Omnipoint's design criteria as it relates to signal level. Omnipoint's Design Criteria 5. By way of background, Orrmipeint has established design criteria so that its wireless network will provide reliable wireless service to its customers, whether those customers are on the street, in a vehicle, or in a building. Providing reliable service to Omnipoint's customers within vehicles and buildings is critical for Omnipoint to provide the quality of wireless service that customers demand and successfully compete with other wireless providers, such as Sprint Nextel, Cingular and Verizon Wireless. To meet customer demands, there are three levels of coverage that Omulpoint strives to provide: In-Vehicle coverage, In-Building Residential coverage, and In-Building Commercial coverage. It is important to understand that the levels of coverage do not represent an objective to achieve a higher level of call quality but to maintain a minimum signal strength and hence reliability of service at the mobile handset as the environment changes. As further detailed below, the signal is, by its nature, subject to attenuation depending upon the conditions and characteristics of the area. The following is a brief description of each level of coverage. 6. In-Vehicle Coverage: To successfully provide reliable In-Vehicle coverage, an Omnipoint customer should be able to place or receive a call within a vehicle successfully across 95% of a site's coverage area. In-Vehicle coverage is the mirfimum level of acceptable coverage within the Omnipoint network in areas with low population and along major highways covering rural areas. One must bear in mind that designing for only the In-Vehicle coverage threshold will typically result in unreliable in- building coverage, and hence customer dissatisfaction. However, since the signal level is stronger closer to the antenna site than further away from the antenna site, there will be some coverage within buildings close to the site. At this time, Omnipoint utilizes the In- Vehicle coverage design in low population density areas within Omnipoint's licensed coverage area. 7. In-Building Residential Coveraee: To successfully provide reliable In- Building Residential coverage, an Omnipoint customer should be able to place or receive a call on the ground floor of a building that is three stories or less in height successfully across 95% of the site's coverage area. In-Building Residential coverage is the mid-level of coverage within Omnipoint's network. In-Building Residential coverage is targeted for residential areas and low-rise commercial districts with building heights of three stories or less. This type of coverage will typically provide reliable coverage over the majority of the cell coverage area; however in some areas, and specifically at the outer geographic boundaries of the cell sites' coverage area, coverage will be restricted only to rooms with windows and will likely lead to customer dissatisfaction if customers try to place or receive a call inside a windowless room, cellar or emergency shelter. 8. In-Building Commercial Coverage: To successfully provide reliable In- Building Commercial coverage, an Omuipoint customer should be able to place or receive a call on the ground floor of a building that is greater than three stories in height successfully across 95% of a site's coverage area. In-Building Commercial coverage is the top level of coverage within the Omnipoint network at tiffs time. In-Building Commercial coverage is targeted for urban residential centers (h/gh-rise buildings), urban business districts and suburban busIness centers. Coverage issues may still occur in hard to serve locations such as within elevators and parking structures. 9. Signal Strength: To provide these levels of coverage, Omrdpoint has scientifically determined the stren~mh of the wireless signal ("signal strength") necessary to provide .in-Vehicle coverage, In-Building Residential coverage, or In-Building Commercial coverage. Because wireless signals are attenuated (i.e. degraded or partially blocked) by obstructions such as trees, automobile windows, automobile sheet metal, and building materials such as wood, brick and metal, a wireless signal must be of sufficient strength In the ambient environment (i.e. outside with no obstructions) to reliably penetrate into automobiles and buildings. 10. Assume for example that a homeowner placed a radio on the front lawn of his house and played a song. The sound level would be louder closer to the radio than farther away because audio sound waves weaken as they travel farther away fi:om their source. The song will be clearly audible to a person with average hearing capacity sitting on the front lawn next to the radio. Another person may be able to hear the song within her car parked in the driveway a short distance away from the radio, although she may have difficulty deciphering the words. Still another person within the house may not be able to hear the song at all. For the person within the house to hear the song, the radio must be moved closer to the house. The song cannot simply be made louder within the house by turning up the volume, as there is a practical limit to how much sound (power) the loudspeakers can produce without physically damaging the radio, or introducing distortion into the sound. Similarly, a cell site's transmission power is limited by the physical output power capabilities of the amplifiers and the legal restrictions of the licenses Omnipoint operates under. It is also important to understand that unlike ti-tis simple radio analogy, a wireless telecommunication system is a two-way system. The signal is transmitted from the antenna site to the receiver in the wireless phone. The wireless phone transmits a signal back to a receiver at the antenna site. Each signal link must work for reliable two-way communication. Therefore, Omnipoint cannot simply mm up the power on its antenna site to provide a stronger signal level because doing this has no impact on the ability of the mobile phone to transmit a signal back to the receiver at the antenna site. The radio frequency power output of mobile phones is far less than the typical output power at the cell site. Although the cell site has some techniques to redress tiffs power imbalance, the link must remain balanced. Accordingly, the relevant question is as follows: How close must the radio be to the house so that the radio waves are strong enough for the person in the house to clearly hear the song? In like manner, Orun/point's design criteria reflect the need to provide a wireless signal strong enough to provide reliable service within a vehicle or building. 1 I. Required Si~nal Stren~h Levels: Wireless signal strength is measured on a logarithmic power scale referenced to 1 milli-watt of power. Signal stren~mJa levels less than lmilti-watt being negative. The smaller the negative dBm number, the stronger the 4 signal. For example, -76dBm is a stronger signal level than -84dBm. Omnipoint's system requires an ambient signal level of-84dBm to provide reliable In-Vehicle coverage, and an ambient signal level of-76dBm to provide reliable In-Building Residential coverage. An ambient signal level of-71dBm is required to provide reliable In-Building Commercial coverage. These signal level requirements provide the basis for Omnipoint's design criteria. The Technical Basis for Omnipoint's Design Criteria 12. At present Omnipoint's design criteria for wireless facilities serving an area are based upon providing 95% reliable signal over a site's coverage area to ensure reliable service for customers. This standard reflects a business judgment that 100% reliability is an unrealistic goal at this time due to financial, technical and environmental constraints. A 95% level of reliability is consistent with the level of service provided by Omnipoint's competitors. Providing service at this level allows Omnipoint to satisfy customers' demands and compete on an equal footing with competitors serving this market. 13. To achieve the 95% reliable design goal, maximum path loss values are derived based upon Omnipoint's technology and the area served. Path loss means the amount the Omnipoint signal is degraded from the point at which the signal leaves the Omnipoint antenna site until it reaches the Omnipoint customer's mobile device or telephone. The equation is as follows: In-Building coverage = Receiver Sensitivity + Body Loss + In Building Loss with Standard Deviation + Fade Margin. Each component of this equation is described below. 14. Returning to our earlier example of the radio on the lawn, we must first determine the minimum song volume for a typical person to hear the song. This is the equivalent to the Receiver Sensitivity. We must then determine the degree to wltich the vehicle, the building and other obstructions in the environment obstruct the song, which is the equivalent to the path loss. Finally we need to introduce the concept of probability. As we do not know the exact location or direction of the listener, we need to make some adjustments for known variances to provide us with a 95% success target, this is the Fade Margin. These radio frequency engineering concepts are explained in more detail below. 15. Receiver Sensitivity: We start with the minimum signal level necessary for a common Omrfipoint telephone or ~vireless device to reliably operate. This minimum signal level is known as the receiver sensitivity, or RX sensitivity. Using the prior example, the minimum signal level is the minimum volume level the radio must be set to enable a typical person to hear and understand the lyrics of the song. 16. Omnipoint's technology is defined by the PCS 1900 Specification, "Radio Transmission and Reception", J-SID 007 Air Interface: Volume 1, 1998, which is based on the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI) GSM recommendations (05.05: ETSI EN 300 910 V8.5.0 (2000-07)). Both technical documents specify a Receiver Sensitivity value of-I02dBm for mobiles operating in the United States. In these independent technical specifications the Receiver Sensitivity is referenced to certain Bit Error Rates (':BER"). The BER limits the speech quality of the call. Receiver Sensitivity refers to the practical limit at which speech quality of a wireless call starts to be severely impacted. The actual BER attained by a mobile device is dependent on a number of factors, including the build quality of the mobile device, the environment the mobile device is operating in (whether in a City or rural area), the speed the mobile user is traveling (slow moving mobile devices suffer extreme variations in performance), the type of radio carder carrying the mobile call (GSM uses different types of carriers, each having differing performance characteristics) and finally the amount of interference present from other Omnipoint mobile users and other external sources. 17. Real worid Receiver Sensitivities (the true limit of acceptable speech) can vary between -93dBm and -108dBm depending on the above factors. ETSI Technical Report 03.30 (GSM Planning Aspects) reconunends Receiver Sensitivity of-102dBm. In addition, this Technical Report also recommends the use of an Interference Margin of 3dB. This is due to the manner in which Receiver Sensitivity is specified in GSM. Receiver Sensitivity is specified as the performance limit in a purely noise limited 6 environment (a single radio carrier). Mobile handset receivers in real world uses operate in the presence of interference as carrier frequencies are re-used. To account for this additional signal degradation an additional allowance of 3dB is made at the receiver due to the presence of these multiple interfering sources. This reduces the Receiver Sensitivity to -99dBm. GSM interference performance is only guaranteed at signal strengths above Receiver Sensitivity. See GSM Recommendations 05.05. 18. Omnipoint has opted not to expressly highlight this Interference Margin in our design guideline calculation since our practical experience has been that the mobile devices have achieved slightly better performance than that originally specified in the GSM Recommendations. Omn/point effectively uses a design level of the Receiver Sensitivity of-105dBm plus the 3dB Interference Margin. This design level also matches the output power of 1W maximum available power from the mobile device, i.e. a lower assumption on the Receiver Sensitivity would only make the link limited by the mobile to cell site transmission path. 19. Next, we must factor in the signal path losses relative to the receiver sensit/vity. Such signal path losses include the body loss, vehicle or building loss, the standard deviation and fade margin as explained below. To return to the analogy by considering these factors we are addressing, to what extent does the car, building or other variables in the environment obstruct the song? 20. Body Loss: Since the mobile device or phone is carded and used by a person, the position of the mobile device or phone with respect to the user's body has an effect on the received radio signal. When the user's body is situated between the mobile telephone's antenna and the antenna site, the user's body will absorb some of the radio energy. Omnipoint customers do not ordinarily position the telephone so that the antenna on the mobile telephone directly faces the antenna site. Therefore, the customers' bodies often partially block the signal. Additional factors can influence Body Loss. For example, in New York State it is illegal for a customer to use a mobile device wl'file driving, and hence customers use either wired or remote headsets. Customers now generally keep the mobile devices clipped to a belt or in a breast pocket. Studies have 7 prodUCed detailed measurements of the effect of body shielding with respect to mobile device position for different radio environments. See Sakamoto M. et al: "Basic Study on Portable Radio Telephone System Design" IEEE VTC Conference 1982. For mobile devices held vertically, the body loss varies from 1.5dB for the head to 4.gdB for the trunk (a mobile device clipped to a belt or placed in a jacket pocket for example). For a mobile device held horizontally, the loss due to the head increases to 5.SdB, with the loss due to the tnmk being 4.2dB. ETSI Technical Report 03.30 GSM Planning Aspects recommends use of a body loss of 3dB. Based on the foregoing, Omnipoint uses an average body loss of 3dB. 21. Building Loss: The concept of building attenuation, commonly referred to as building loss, has long been defined as the difference between the median field strength intensity at street level averaged mound the exterior of the building, and the median field strength intensity at a location on the first floor inside the building. This difference is known as the building loss. See Rice LP: "Radio Transmission into buildings on 35 and 150 MHz" Bell Systems Technical Journal 1959. Many measurements have been performed to derive values of the mean building loss for different types of buildings and environments. One researcher found mean losses of approximately 27dB for downtown Tokyo. See Kozono et al: "Influence of Environmental Buildings on UHF Land Mobile Radio Propagation" IEEE Transactions on communications October 1977. Another researcher has described losses of 15dB for downtown Chicago. See Walker E H: "Penetration of radio signals in to buildings in a Cellular Environment" Bell Systems Technical Journal 1983. Extensive measurements were performed at 900MHz in New York and determined that the median value of loss is 20dB. See Durante J: "Building Penetration loss at 900MHz" IEEE VTG Conference 1973. Researchers in Philadelphia, measured building losses averaging 16dB at 1900Mhz and 19dB at 800MHz for a range of buildings in urban, suburban and rural areas. See Tanis W and Pilato G: "Building penetration characteristics of 880MHz and 1922MHz Radio Waves" IEEE Journal 1993. Measurements in Liverpool, UK, showed losses averaging I3.4dB for measurements made at the ground floor of buildings. See Turkmani A and Toledo A: Radio Transmission at 1800MHz in to and within multistory buildings", IEEE Proceedings-l, vol 138, No 6 December 1991. Further measurements within Liverpool showed losses of between 24dB and 9dB for buildings in the City center and losses on the University campus of between 14 and ISdB. See Toledo A, Turkmani A and Parsons J, IEEE Personal Communications, April 1998. The ETSI Technical Report 03.30 (GSM Planning Aspects) uses building losses of 15dB for urban and 10dB for rural areas. Based on the foregoing, and as further described below, Omrfipoint uses an 11 dB loss for In-Building Residential and a 16dB loss for In-Building Commercial. 22. In addition to the "static" loss of 11 and 16dB, Omnipoint uses the reported "Standard Deviation" of building loss of 6.5dB and 7.0dB as reported in the references above. Durante and Rice compiled the largest set of measurement results in order to extract the standard deviation of the building loss. Rice quoted a deviation of 12 to 14dB around the mean loss and Durante reported 5 to 7.5dB deviation for ground floor measurements. Turkmani et. al. reported a standard deviation of 7.2dB for the buildings in the Liverpool measurement study. Standard Deviation is used to ovemome the statistical distributions of building losses in an area. For example, the average loss for Residential buildings may be lldB. However, some buildings made of brick or with aluminum siding, for example, may have much greater losses as high as 25dB or more. The standard deviation of the building loss is used in a calculation to ensure that 95% of buildings are covered and not just 50% of buildings if only the mean loss was taken into account. 23. Vehicle Loss: With respect to vekicle loss, it is important to note that the majority of customers use hand portable devices without exterior antennas on the vehicle. The signal strength loss due to the need to penetrate the vehicle to reach the handset must be taken into account when designing RF coverage for highways using the In- Vehicle coverage criteria. Extensive measurements have been performed at 900 MHz in three vehicle types; minivan, full sized car and small sports car. See Ivica Kostanic, Chris Hall and John McCarthy, TEC CELLULAR, Inc., VTC IEEE Conference 1997. Measurements were made w/th the mobile phone adjacent to the driver's head, with the mobile phone on the dashboard and with the mobile phone on the passenger seat. It was determined that for a minivan, losses (including body losses) were between 8 and 9dB with a standard deviation of 2 to 3dB. Losses for a full sized car were between 7.25 and 9 9otb (including body losses). Due to size of the windows in the small sports car, losses were found to be higher at between 9 and 14dB. ETSI Technical Report 03.30 (GSM Planning Aspects) recommends a vehicle loss of 6dB. Based on the foregoing, Omnipoint utilizes a figure o£ 6dB for vehicle losses. 24. Fade Mar~in and Standard Deviation: The standard deviation is a mathematical expression of how a set of data samples varies from the mean value. For example, if an observer was to measure the speeds of cars passing a point and plot the number of cars observed at each speed the graph would probably resembles a "Bell" curve. One speed will be the mean or average speed and represent the top of the Bell. On either side of this mean, fewer and fewer cars will have higher or lower speeds, forming the sloping sides of the Bell. The Standard Deviation is a measure of the width of the Bell. A low Standard Deviation would represent a narrow Bell. A large standard deviation would represent a wide Bell. In a mobile radio environment the observed signal strength varies at any point due to the radio waves taking numerous different paths fi:om the transmit antenna to the receiver antenna and the minute variations in the surroundings (moving objects, vibrations, temperature effects, and local obstructions such as cars and trees). These effects produce "Fast" changing signal strengths at the mobile device. These effects are generally overcome by system features such as "Frequency Hopping", where the radio frequency is changed many times a second. Terrain obstacles, trees, and buildings, produce "Slow" changing effects, where the signal strength at the mobile device can change as the user moves a short distance. All of us will experience these effects if we talk on a wireless handset while walking. The observed signal strength will change as we move along. Slow fading effects result in a margin of error between the propagation tools used to prepare the coverage maps, and the mean signal at the mobile device. These Slow or Shadow fading effects must be compensated for in the design of the system. 25. Digital planning tools try to match a model of the propagation em, irenment to known measurements in an area. If the model is successful then thc accuracy of the model will approach the slow fading levels encountered in the field. A good model will estimate the long-term average mean of the signal over the prediction l0 square or bin (generally a 100 meter or 25 meter square). The slow fading and any additional model errors will be seen as a standard deviation of the tool when compared to known measurements. The planning tool that Omnipoint employs uses industry leading digital terrain and environmental databases and uses advanced calculations to produce an accurate estimation of the signal strength on the ground. The accuracy of the tool is better than 8 to 12dB Standard Deviation depending on environment as quoted by the manufacturer Aircom and verified by field measurements. The tool uses the European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research Subgroup on Propagation (Cost 231) Model. This is an extended version of the industry standard Okumura-Hata model. 26. Slow fading measurements in the field show a typical range of between 4 and 6 dB for non line of sight environments and between 6 and 9dB where a dominant propagation path exists. See Turkmani A and Toledo A: Estimating Coverage of Radio Transmission in to and within Buildings at 900, 1800 and 2300MHz, IEEE Personal Communications, April 1998. Based on the accuracy of the tool in resolving shadoMng errors and the residual slow fading error inherent in radio transmissions, Omnipoint utilizes a slow/shadow fading standard deviation of 8dB. It is important to understand that the published measurements of slow fading relate to measurements at a single point whereas Omnipoint is setting a compensation figure for the variance in predicted signal over a wider 100m bin. 27. The building losses also include a measure of variance with the Standard Deviation of the building losses being between 6.5dB and 7.0dB. The slow fading Standard Deviation and the in-building loss Standard Deviation are statistically independent and hence can be combined in to a single distribution using the following formula: IJ ~4(G slowfading+ IJ building loss) 28. The computer software-planning tool creates a propagation map by predicting the average signal strength for a small area (e.g. a 100m by 100m square), based on a digital terrain database mud a computer model that predicts the mean signal for 11 each small area. A margin of error due to the Standard Deviation of the slow fading and building losses exists between the tool's prediction and the expected mean signal level. 29. The expected signal strength forms a lognormal distribution (a "belt" curve) around the predicted local mean. In other words, due to the variation in the environment across the predicted area, an additional margin is needed such that a certain probability of coverage is attained. This margin is deemed the Fade Margin. 30. Two methods may be used to calculate the Fade Margin. The fzrst method uses the probability of a detected signal strength exceeding a defined threshold across a single prediction square (edge probability). The second method uses the probability across many squares to provide a wide area probability (cell area probability). Both probabilities are interlinked and depend on the variation in signal strength across the small prediction area, i.e. the standard deviation ("~"). 31. Determination of the fade margin and associated area cell reliability figures are calculated using the lognormal fading equations and methodology. See W.C. Jakes, Jr., "Microwave Mobile Communications," John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974 (p. 126). This is the standard recommended methodology as described by the ETSI Techrfical Report of GSM Planning Aspects. The appropriate fade margin for 95% reliability employs the following equation: F/t= -e~ a +ex -e Given that ~ awI lOnlog(e) Where Fu represents the traction of useful area for which the signal strength x exceeds a given threshold Xo (the wanted fade margin), c~ is the combined standard deviation and n represents the distance/power law relationship. "n" is the rate at which radio waves 12 decrease with the Log of distance. It has been shown to be between 2 and 6, see Turk_man/A and Toledo A: Radio transmission at 1800MHz into and within multistory buildings, IEE Proceedings vol 138, No6 Dec 1991. The value of "n" depends on the environment and propagation conditions. Omnipoint uses a value of 3.5 as recommended in ETSI Technical Report 03.30 (GSM Planning Aspects). For example, in a suburban environment, design levels for In-Vekicle would be calculated by the following: ~ = 8dB Body Loss = 3dB In vehicle loss = 6dB Receiver Sensitivity = - 102dBm Path loss n =.3.5 Reliability = 95°I The required signal on the street outside the vehicle would be: Xo = Receiver Sensitivity + body loss + In-Vehicle loss = -102dBm + 3dB + 6dB = -93dBm Setting Fu= 0.95, n=3.5 Xo=-93dBm and o-=SdB and solving for X in the equation above gives X= -84.4dBm, i.e. a total fade margin of 17.6dB. 32. The appropriate signal strength planning levels for all area types are shown in the table below. MS (Rx Fade Margin Planning Area Sensitivity) and losses Level in-Vehicle - 102 dBm 17.6 -84.4 dBm In-Building -I 02 dBm 26.0 -76.0 dBm (residential) In-Building -I02 dBm 31.4 -70.6 dBm (commercial) 13 33. Based on the foregoing, Omnipoint's dedgn criteria are factu~lly and statistically justified. Conclusion Based on the foregoing I respectfully request that thc application by Omnipoint bc favorably considered and the r~qucsted approval be granted forthwith. Respectfuny submi~:~xt, MAKKCOSGKOVE Sworn to before me this ;~%~ day otUanuary~ 2006 · Notary FubHc Z:~ $ DATA'~WPDA.TA~ ~3~[3G~voic~,n~C~sgr~e · ROSERTAS 80RNSTEIN · No. tary Pul31ic'o..f New Jerse my ~ommision ~-x13ir6.~ 7/03~ 0 ]4 Exhibit 1 Mark Cosgrove Curriculum Vitae Mark Cosgrove 21 Clinton Ave, Maplewood NJ 07040 Mark. Cosgrove t~-mob ile.com S~Y More than 20 years of experience in the telecommunications field, with more than 15 years in wireless RF engineering. Experience with GSM, PDC, GPRS, EDGE, and CDMA technology. Proven track record of managing major projects, large departments, and complex development issues. Experienced in all aspects of technology development, network operation, planning and deployment, having managed R&D activities in several major companies and built and operated Cellular networks in the world's largest markets. US Green card holder, British Citizenship. EDUCA~ON University of Essex, England, B.Eng (lions} Electrical and Electronic Engineering (Telecommunications) 1984 - 1987 EMPLOYMENT T-Mobile USA 2000 - present Director RF Engineering New York Metro, Parsippany, NJ, USA 2004 - Providing leadership and strategic management to the RF Optimization and Planning depaaments for New York Metro area, a department of over 100 engineers. Ensuring the smooth day-to-day running ora 2200 site market, carrying over I million Erlangs of traffic per day, with a development budget in excess of $550 million, and over 600 site per annum build plan. Tasks include setting the technical strategy and vision for the market, distilling this strategy to the departments and ensuring goals and objectives support a common development path. Development of work procedures, ._ process improvement and documentation to improve efficiency. Directly invotved in the training of engineering staff. Director RF System Engineering, Bellevue, WA, USA 2000 - 2004 Managing a department of 50 people, with responsible for all aspects o£ RF planning (planning guidelines, documentation, planning tools, capacity roadmap and features); RF performance (statistical tool development,, forecasting tools, network enhancement task force, GPRS performance); and BSS engineering (technical vendor management, new feature testing and implementation, hardware and software development). Major projects include development standardization, and initial deployment of GPRS, EDGE, AMR, TTY, and E911 (phase 2 software, hardware, and functionality), development of company strategies and business cases. Responsible for developing T-Mobile's 3G strategy, based on W-CDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.1 lb, OFDM, and other emerging technologies. Main technical representative for T-Mobile when dealing with FCC, authoring T-Mobile's technical waivers for E911 and TTY and presenting pro~ess reports direct to FCC Commissioners and Wireless Bureau Executive Staff. Omnipoin/Communication Services 1998 - 2000 Principle Engineer/RI:Manger New Jersey, NTMTA Engineering Dept, Wayne, NJ, USA As sole Principal Engineer for Omnipoint corporate, responsible for defining and implementing technical and managerial standards in the areas of: RF Planning and design, RF Performance and Optimization, traffic forecasting and prediction methodologies, and EME safety standards. Managed Ericsson and other ancillary equipment vendors, responsible for technical assessment and approval. Brought in to NJ to revive poor performing market; reduced the drop call rate in New Jersey to less than 1.5% from more than 4.0% in the first three months of taking responsibility for the performance of the system. Took res~sibility for planning and optimization m~[ging a team of 11 engineers, building~nearly 300 sites in 18 months. Managed technology change out from Ericsson to Siemens. Airtouch International 1994 - 1998 Technical Director, Technical Engineering Dept, Walnut Creelq CA, U$.4 1997-!998 Managed the technical program of R&D in the areas of CDMA, GSM, PCS, mobile satellite, wireless data, WLL, advanced intelligent networks, and enhanced services. Working directly with all international markets, external organi~tions, and vendors to set Airtouch's technology strategy, introduce new technologies in to the market place and develop new business applications and opportunities. International RF Manager, Tokyo Digital £ hone Group, Tokyo, Japan 1994-1997 Managed a staff of ten engineers in this Airtoueh joint venture. Responsible for radio cell planning and the design and development ora PDC system in Tokyo. Major achievements ianluded revamping the planning process, resulting in more than 200 new sites planned for central Tokyo in eight months, accelerating the cell build program ahead of schedule. Managed a radio capital budget of more than US$300 million. Personal initiatives during commercial negotiations resulted in capex savings of more than US$50 million. Authored technical reports on capacity options, network architecture, new technology, cost analysis of cell design, system quality, and half-rate coding. British Telecom 1980 - 1994 GSM RF Manager, Cellnet, Slough, England 1990- 1994 Project manager for the development and introduction of GSM radio, with additional responsibility for research management. Major achievements included authoring sections of GSM air interface specification through the ETSI committee, negotiating technical con~'acts with Motorola and Nokia, successfully managing the approval process for vendors, identifying design problems and improvements in performance, and producing radio planning and design rules for GSM. PIanned and introduced the first two GSM networks for BT Cellnet in the UK Corapater Systems Manager, BT, London, England 1990 Responsible for supporting and developing project management tools and databases used by a team delivering a US$750-million microwave radio-based communication network to the British Ministry of Defense. Designed and developed a secure computer system, providing centralized database and management tools. Developed training packages and courses for users. Microwave Development Manager, 1~ T, London, England 1987 - J 990 Responsible for managing the specification, design, development, vendor negotiation, and type- approval of fixed-link microwave radio systems in the 6GHz, 11GHz, and 18GHz bands. Responsible for developing computer prediction tools and performance monitoring equipment. Personal achievements included successfully managing a new 18GHz vendor for 2Mbit systems. Engineering Technician, BT, Manchester, England 29804987 Entered BT as an Apprentice Engineer, working in all aspects of the fixed line business before specializing in transmission system construction. Work areas include digital and analogue transmission system construction, optical fiber installation and jointing. Award scholarship to attend University of Essex in 1984. TOWAIR Search Results Page 1 of 1 TOWAZR Determination Results *** NOTICE *** TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine if it must coordinate its structure with the FAA. TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence, and further investigation may be necessary to determine if FAA coordination is appropriate. DETERNINATION Results Structure does not require registration, There are no airports within 8 kilometers (5 miles) of the coordinates you provided. Your Specifications NAD83 Coordinates Latitude Longitude Measurements (i~leters) OveraJl Structure Height (AGL) Support Structure Height (AGL) Site Elevation (AMSL) Structure Type POLE * Any type of Pole 41-07-41.8 north 072-20-28.8 west 33.5 33.5 11.3 20 0 .T_9we r ~ .o.D.~_t..r..u_.c_t ion Notification_._s Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower. http://wireless2, fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/towairResult j sp?printable 9/22/2009 PUBLIC AIRPORTS IN PROXIMITY OF CASE File: LI13345A OVERALL ELEVATION (AMSL): LATITUDE: 41°-07'-41.8'' LONGITUDE: 720-20'-28.79" 147 FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME TO FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 HTO AIR EAST HAMPTON 158.19 10.907 +92 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a)(1) or 77.13{a)(2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. AS a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 65141 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 41 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. This airport has both Circling and Straight-In Instrument Procedures. Please review published US Terminal (TERPS®) Approach Procedures for this landing facility. DNE 77.13(a)(4) Straight-In Criteria HTO Category 'D' Circling Approach Area extends 3.78 NM from each runway. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARp FAR IDENT TYP NAME TO FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 21N AIR MATTITUCK 223.62 11.671 +117 YES This facility does not have a runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a)(1) or 77.13(a)(2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. AS a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 70315 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 22 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. This facility has a circling approach procedure. Circling procedures have a Straight-In segment. The site can be out of the circling approach area and still be in the straight in approach segment. Please review published US Terminal Procedures for this landing facility to determine what impact (if any) this site has on the procedure(s) and/or airport. DNE 77.13(a)(4) Straight-In Criteria 21N Category 'A' Circling Area extends 1.30 NM from all runways. Category 'B' Circling Area extends 1.84 NM from all runways. Category 'C' Circling Area extends 2.89 NM from all runways. Category 'D' Circling Area extends 3.78 NM from all runways. Category 'E' Circling Area extends 4.73 NM from all runways. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 %B8 AIR ELIZABETH FIELD 62.14 15.852 +138 YES This facility does not have a runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13{a) (1) or 77.13{a) (2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 95355 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 7 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight-In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. NO Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME TO FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 SNC AIR CHESTER 334.15 17.04 -269 YES This facility does not have a runway over 3,280 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a)(1) or 77.13(a)(2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please rev.ew reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 65141 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 41 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight-In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. No Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME TO FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 87N BEL SOUTHAMPTON 198.25 17.749 +142 YES Your structure DOES NOT EXCEED FAR 77.13(a){2) Notice Criteria for this heliport. You are not locating within 5,000 feet of facility. You are beyond limit by: 102844.7 feet. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 GON AIR GROTON-NEW LONDON 47.86 18.064 +138 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a) (1) or 77.13(a) {2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 70315 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 22 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight-In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. No Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 MTP AIR MONTAUK 99.4 19.326 +141 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a)(1) or 77.13(a) (2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 65141 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 41 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight-In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. No Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME TO FACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 42B AIR GOODSPEED 344.84 19.715 +138 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a) (1) or 77.13(a) (2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 70315 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 22 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. No Expected TERPS® impact. FACIL BEARING DISTANCE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT TYP NAME To EACIL IN N.M. ELEVATION P77 FOK AIR FRANCIS S GABRESKI 217.61 21.574 +80 YES This facility has at least one runway over 3,200 feet in length. Your structure DNE FAR 77.13(a) (1) or 77.13(a) (2) Notice Criteria for this airport. However, you may EXCEED other Notice Standards. As a minimum, please review reports for FAR Part 77 Obstruction Surfaces, Air Navigation and Communication facilities. You are 70315 feet from the nearest runway threshold and the threshold elevation is 22 feet. Please review runway analysis for remaining airport surfaces. No Circling or Straight-In Instrument Approach Procedures were found for this landing facility or your proposed location is greater than 10 nautical miles from the airport. No Expected TERPS® impact. THE NEAREST AIRPORT TO CASE COORDINATES IS: HTO EAST HAMPTON is an Airport type landing facility and is associated with the city of EAST HAMPTON, NY. The facility is eligible for Study under ~AR Part 77 sub Part C. Its Reference Point (ARP) elevation is: 55 feet AMSL and you are locating 66271 feet from this landing facility. 4 Airspace® Version 2009.9 AIRSPACE® and TERPS® are registered ® trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace® Copyright © 1989 - 2009 09-17-2009 11:43:43 The mathematical algorithms used by this program are derived directly from Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77, sub-part C. Notice Criteria Tool Page I of 2 Notice Criteria Tool The requirements for filing with the Federal Aviation Administratien for proposed structures vary based on a number of factors: height, proximity to an airporL location, and frequencies emitted from the structure, etc For more details, please reference CFR Title 14 Part 77t 3. YOU must file with the FAA at least 30 days prior to construction if: your structure will exceed 200tt above ground level your structure will be in proximity to an airpod and will exceed the slope ratio your structure involves construction of a traverseway (i.e. highway, railroad, waterway etc ) your structure will emit frequencies, and does not meet the conditions of the FPu~, Co-location Policy your structure will be in an instrument approach area and might exceed pad 77 Subpad C your structure will be on an airport or helipod If you require additional information regarding the tiling requirements for your structure, please identif~ and contact the appropriate FAA representative using the Air Traffic Areas of Respor~sibili:¥' map for Off Airport construction, or contact the FAA Airports Region / District Off[ce for On Airport construction The tool below will assist in applying the appropriate slope calculations per patt 7713(a)(2)(i) through (iii) Site Elevation (gE): ~ Cnearest foot) iStructure Height (AGL): [~ (nearest foot) Results You do not exceed Notice Criteria. https://oeaaa, faa.gov/oeaaa/external/gisTools/gisAction j sp?action=doNoNoticeRequiredTool&IatD... 5/8/2009 Notice Criteria Tool Page 2 of 2 https://~eaaa.faa.g~v/~eaaa/extema~/gisT~s/gisActi~n.jsp?acti~n=d~N~N~ticeRequiredT~&~atD... 5/8/2009 PREPARED FOR T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATION EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SITE NUMBER: LI13345A SITE TYPE: EXISTING MONOPOLE PROVIDED BY: BAY STATE DESIGN. INC. DECEMBER 2009 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SITE NUMBER: LI13345A SITE TYPE: EXISTING MONOPOLE Provided By: Bay State Design. Inc. 241 Boston Post Road West Marlborough. MA 01752 ph. 5081 229.4100 fax 5081 485.5321 Issued: December 19, 2009 Rev I Rev 2: Drav,,n By: A L Checked By K.B Note These photo simulahons are ~ntended to represent modihcations rolahve to a person observing the aestltet~cs of the proposed telecornrnun~catio~)s installation Therefore they are mherenl~y approximate m nature aed should not be used as at} exact, sca~ed, engineerit~g dra wing T-Mobile Northeast LLC, contracted Bay State Design, Inc. to create computer-simulated photographs depicting the proposed installation, consisting of proposed T-Mobile equipment and antennas. The existing monopole is located at 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY 11939. Setting: The subject property is in the hamlet of East Marion to the north of the intersection of Main Rd., and Bay Ave. Methodology: In mid-October 2009, Bay State Design, Inc. conducted a field investigation for the purpose of evaluating the views associated with the proposed installation at the subject site. The conditions were mostly sunny, around 60 degrees, with minimal winds. The study area consisted of the monopole located at 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY 1:~939. Photographs were taken from various vantage points of the study area to document the actual views of the monopole. Each photograph attached, includes a brief description of the location and the orientation from which it was taken, as summarized below. View 1 View looking south Approximately 43' away (Visible) View 2 View looking west Approximately 35' away (Visible) View 3 View looking north Approximately 27' away (Visible) View 4 View looking east Approximately 56' away (Visible) View 5 View looking north Approximately 82' away (Not Visible) View 6 View looking northeast from enterance Approximately 140' away (Visible) View 7 View looking southwest from Cedar Dr. & Stars Road. Approximately 704' away (Visible) View 8 View looking southeast from Oak Court Approximately 350' away (Visible) View 9 View looking northwest from Cemetery Road Approximately 801' away (Visible) View 10 View looking west from Cemetery Road Approximately 646' away (Visible) View 11 View looking northwest from Bay Ave. Approximately 523' away (Visible) View 12 View looking northwest from Bay Ave. & Main Road Approximately 328' away (Visible) View 13 View looking northeast from Main Road Approximately 994' away (Not Visible) These photo locations are presented on the "Site Photograph Location Map" attached. Process: Photographs of the viewpoints noted were taken with a Canon Powershot SX10 IS digital camera utilizing a 20x Optical Zoom, 10~megapixel resolution, 28mm lens, and DIGIC 4 Image Processor for high- performance face and motion detection. Photographs that contain simulated views of the proposed installation were downloaded as digital images onto a computer. Digital images of the site and the proposed equipment were merged and manipulated through the use of the image editing software, "Adobe Photoshop CS3". With this process the installation is scaled to the correct size. The composition is printed out directly on a color printer, producing the final image. Distance from the vantage point to the subject site was approximated using Google Earth software. Conclusion: The proposed T-Mobile Northeast, LLC, installation, consisting of an existing monopole located at 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY 11939 and will not have an adverse aesthetic impact on the community. By: Kostandin Butka Senior Project Manager, Bay State Design, Inc. © NORTH EXISTING 6' HIGH AT~T COMPOUND FENCE AT&T 5' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER (FROM DATED 3/30/2007) ~P. ON NORTH, F~T EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT ARF~ EXI$11N~ AT&T ICE BRIDGE EXISTING 110' HIGH LI 13-345A East Marion Fire Department PHOTOSIM POINT OF VIEW MAP 1 NORTH / ' , , ',, PHOTOSIM POINT OF VIEW ,,,,,, ,' // ~,,, ,, MAP 2 LI 13-345A East Marion Fire Dep~ment SChk[: 1" ~ 200' ViEW I Em EX~$T,WG COND~T,CONS LOOKING AT NORTH SIDE ViEW 1 PROPOSED ANTENNAS I LOOK}NGAT NORTH SiDE VIEW 2 EX.~ST~NG CONDiTiONS LOOKING A'T EAST SIDE ViEW 2 PROPOSED ANTENNAS [NOT VtS~,BLE} LOOKING AT EAST S~DE E~'IST~NG COND~, T,~ONS I LOO¢.ING AT SOUTH SiDE V~EW 3 £X~STIN6 CONDfTIOI¥S j LOOKING AT WEST S~DE ViEW 4 VIEW OF EXISTING Fi:RE STATION BUILDING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY V~EW 7 V~W ~ ViEW 9 ViEW 10 V~EW 1t V~EW 12 V~EW '~3 PREPARED FOR T-MOBIL NORTHEAST LLC PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATION EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARI~, NY 11939 ~$T~' NUMBIFI~LI13345A ~tTE TYPE: EXISTINC.- MONOPOLE PRO¥~ED BY BAY STATE DES~C~ DECEMBER 2009 IGN T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SITE NUMBER: LI13345A SITE TYPE: EXISTING MONOPOLE Provided By: Bay State Design. Inc. 241 Boston Posl Road West Marlborough, MA 01752 ph. 5081 229.4100 fax 5081 485.5321 Iss~.;ed December 19, 2009 Rev i Rev 2: Drawn By: A L Checked By K,B Note These photo s~mulatlons are tfltended to represent mod~hcaPons retahve to a person observing Ihe aesthePcs of the proposed talecommun~calions installation Therefore they are inherently approximate in nalure and should nol be used as an exact scaled, engineering drawing T-Mobile Northeast I_LC, contracted Bay State Design, Inc. to create computer-simulated photographs depicting the proposed installation, consisting of proposed T-Mobile equipment and antennas. The existing monopole is located at 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY 1:1939. Setting: The su~ect propertyisin the hamlet of East Marion to the north oftheintersection of Main Rd.,and Bay Ave. Methodology: In mid-October 2009, Bay State Design, Inc. conducted a field investigation for the purpose of evaluating the views associated with the proposed installation at the subject site. The conditions were mostly sunny, around 60 degrees, with minimal winds. The study area consisted of the monopole located at 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY 11939. Photographs were taken from various vantage points of the study area to document the actual views of the monopole. Each photograph attached, includes a brief description of the location and the orientation from which it was taken, as summarized below. View I View looking south Approximately 43' away (Visible) View 2 View looking west Approximately 35' away (Visible) View 3 View looking north Approximately 27' away (Visible) View 4 View looking east Approximately 56' away (Visible) View 5 View looking north Approximately 82' away (Not Visible) View 6 View looking northeast from enterance Approximately 140' away (Visible) View ? View looking southwest from Cedar Dr. & Stars Road. Approximately 704' away (Visible) View 8 View looking southeast from Oak Court Approximately 350' away (Visible) View 9 View looking northwest from Cemetery Road Approximately 801' away (Visible) View 10 View looking west from Cemetery Road Approximately 646' away (Visible) View 11 View looking northwest from Bay Ave. Approximately 523' away (Visible) View 12 View looking northwest from Bay Ave. & Main Road Approximately 328' away (Visible) View 13 View looking northeast from Main Road Approximately 994' away (Not Visible) These photo locations are presented on the "Site Photograph Location Map" attached. Process: Photographs of the viewpoints noted were taken with a Canon Powershot 5X10 IS digital camera utilizing a 20x Optical Zoom, 10-megapixel resolution, 28mm lens, and DIGIC 4 Image Processor for high- performance face and motion detection. Photographs that contain simulated views of the proposed installation were downloaded as digital images onto a computer. Digital images of the site and the proposed equipment were merged and manipulated through the use of the image editing software, "Adobe Photoshop C53'. With this process the installation is scaled to the correct size. The composition is printed out directly on a color printer, producing the final image. Distance from the vantage point to the subject site was approximated using Google Earth software. Conclusion: The proposed T-Mobile Northeast, LLC, installation, consisting of an existing monopole located at 9245 Main Road, East Marion, NY 1:1939 and will not have an adverse aesthetic impact on the community. By: Kostandin Butka Senior Project Manager, Bay State Design, Inc. NORTH II I I EXISTING 6'-HIGH AT&T COMPOUND FENCE ~I EXISTING ATAT EQUIPMENT ~ ~ I , ~~~ ~ ..... ~1~(~ ~ } , LI 13-345A East Marion Fire Department PHOTOSIM POINT OF VIEW MAP 1 NORTH PHOTOSIM PO~T OF VIEW MAP 2 V~EWI LOOKING AT NORTH ViEW 1 PROPOSED ANTENNAS ~ LOOKING AT NOIRYH SiDE VIEW EXeS TING COND~T';ONS ~ LOOKING AT EAST SiDE ViEW PROPOSED ANTENNAS fNOT VIS~ECLE) LOOKING AT EAST SIDE V~EW 3 E~'ST~N¢ CONDIT,cONS I LOOKING AT SOUTH SIDE V~W 3 PROPOSED ANTENNAS [NOT vIStBLE~ ! LOOKING AT SOUTH SiDE V~EW 4 ~X¢ST~NG CONDITIONS LOOKING AT WEST SIDE ViEW 4 ViEW EX/ST;¢NG B:UCLD~NO I V~EW OF EXIST~NG FiRE STATION BUiLDiNG ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ViEW 7 V~EW 8 ViEW 9 VIEW 10 ViEW VIeW 12 MEMORANDUM OF LEASE Assessor's Parcel Number: Section 31, Lot 11.31, 3 Between East Marion Fire Dislri et ("Landlord') and T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("Tenent") NAME AND ADDRESS OF LANDLORD: East Marion Fire District 9245 Main Roed ) Oo be'r-, East Marion, NY 11939 NAME AND ADDRESS OF TENANT: LEASE DATE OF EXECTU1ON: T-Mobile Northeast LLC 4 Sylvan Way Parsippany, NJ 07054 A1~n: Lease Administration Manager SITE LEASE WITH OPTION: A Site Lease with Option (the "Lease") by and between East Marion Fire District, a(n) ("Landlord") and T- Mobile Northeast LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Tenant") was made regarding a portion of the property der, cribed below (the "Leased Premises"). DESCRIPTION OF LEASED PREMSIES: The Leased Premises consists of a portion of the property (the "Property") known by the street address 9245 Main Road, East Marion 11939, Stale of New Yorlq which is sufficient for the placement of Antenna Facilities together with easements for access and utilities. A metes and bounds description of the Property is incorporated herein as Exhibit "A.' TERM OF THE LEASE: The term of the Lease is for five (5) years, commencing on the date of the exercise of the Option (the "Commencement Date") and expiring on midnight on the last day of the Initial or Renewa Term (the "Expiration Date") OPTION TO EXTEND: Tenant has an option to extend the term of the Lease for five (5) successive periods of five (5) years [each]. This Lease shall automatically renew for each successive Renewal Term, unless Tenant notifies Landlord, in writing, of Tenant's intention not to renew this Lease, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term. TERMS OF THE LEASE GOVERN: The rights, obligations and remedies of Landlord and Tenant, respectively, with reference to each other and the Leased Premises shall be fixed, determined and governed .solely by the terms of the Lease, this being a Memorandum of Lease exccated by the parties hereto for the purpose of providing an instrument pursuant to Section 291-C of the Real Property Low of the State of New York in lieu of recordlng the Lease. The parties hereto have executed and delivered this Memorandum of Lease for the purpose of giving notice of the Lease to whomever it may concern. Fro a statement of the fights, privileges and obligations created under the Lease and of the options, terms, covenants and conditions contained therein, reference should be made to the Lease. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed this memorandum effective as of the date of the last party to sign, LANDLORD: /E"ast Ma}ion Fire District / By: ~//~~/'~/'/~/~' / Title: ~__~_l,4q~--t/~ t'~ ~ Date: TENANT: T-Mobile Northeast LLC Printed Name: Title: Date: Sile Number: STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF ~--~ (o[, ~ ) or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instxument and acknowledged to me that he/sheAhey executed the same in his/her/their capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signatures on the instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the instrument. CI CAROL A. MILLER h/OTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ~EW YORK OUA__.N~. , .... ~L.[HEO IN SUFFOLK COUNTy '' ;~ UN EXPIRES FEBRUAI~..~ Notary Public My commission expires (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) [LANDLORD NOTARY BLOCK FOR ACKNOWLEI)GEMENT OUTSTIDE NEW YORK STATEI STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) On the day of in the year before me personally appeared , per~,onally known to me or proved to me on the basis of ~atisfaetory evidence Io be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and o~;knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their capacity(les), and that by his/her/~heir signa'ture(s) on the instrament, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the instrument, Notary Public Print Name My commission expires. (Use this space for notary stamp/seat) STATE OF NEW YORK ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) On the day in the year before me, the undersigned, personally appeared , personally known m mt or proved to me on the basis of satisfacto~ evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrumen~ and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/bet/their capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signatures on instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which 'dae individual(s) acted, executed the instrument. Notary Public ~rint Name My commission expires (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) Site Number: LI13345^ Site Lease - v~rsion 6.3006 [TENANT NOTARY BLOCK FOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT OUT$ITE NEW YORK STATE! STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) On the day of in the year before me personally appeared , persona/ly known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that be/she~they executed the same in his/her/their capacity(ins), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the instrament. Notary Public Print Name My commission expires (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) She Number: LII3345A Memorandum of Lease Exhibit A Legal Description Lot Number: 11.31, Block Number: 3 The Property is legally described ns follows: AT&T Site: EAST MARION FIRE / FA 10107550 T-Mobile Site: EAST MARION / LI13345 SITE LICENSE AGREEMENT This Site License Agreement ("SLA"), entered into this 2~- day of 0(a'[0~ , 200_~ ("SLA Effective Date") between New Cingular Wireless eCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, hereinafter designated as LICENSOR and T-Mobile Northeast LLC a Delaware limited liability company, bereinaficr designated as LICENSEE. This SLA is a SLA as referenced in that certain Master Lease Agreement between T-MOBILE USA, INC. and AT&T Mobility LLC, Successor-in-interest to CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC dated Janumy 5, 2005 ("MLA"), as amended. All of the terms and conditions of the MLA are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof without the necessity of repeating or artaching the MLA. In the event ora contradiction, modification or inconsistency between the terms of the MLA and this SLA, the terms &the MLA shall govern and control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, in the event a See. 12, Special Provision, herein, is necessitated by compliance with any regulatory requirement and such Special Provision contradicts, modifies or is inconsistent with the terms of the MLA, such Special Provision shall control. Capitalized terms used in this SLA shall have the same meaning described for them in the MLA unless otherwise indicated herein. Site No. and Name (if applicable): LICENSOR: FA# 10107550 / EAST MARION FIRE LICENSEE: LI13345 / EAST MARION Site Address and the Land which is more particularly described in Attachment I attached hereto and incorporated herein: 9395 MAIN ROAD, EAST MARION, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. Site Latitude and Longitude: Lat: 41.130110 ° N Lon: -72.339880 o W The LICENSEE Antenna Facilities to be placed on the Properly and the location of the Premises are detailed in and shall be consistent with Attachment 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein. The term of this SLA shall be as set forth in Sections 4 and 5 of the MLA, except: N/A The Rent commencement date of the SLA shall be the first day of the month following the earlier of either; i) one hundred eighty (180) days after full execution of this SLA; or ii) the date specified on the Notice to Proceed ("NTP') from LICENSOR. The Rent for the initial term of this SLA shall be at an annual rental el I i~to be paid in equal monthly installments on the first day of the month, in advance, to LICENSOR at the following address: AT&T Mobility, Attn: Co-location A/R, P.O. Box 97079, Rec'~ond, Washington 98073-9779 or to such other person, firm or place as the LICENSOR may, from time to time, designate in writing at least thirty (30) days in advance of any rental payment date. All Rent checks shall have LICENSOR's site number clearly written on the face of the check. If the Property is subject to a prime lease, license or other such agreement granting LICENSOR's interest of the Property, a copy of such agreement is attached hereto as Attachment 3. If consent is required from Owner, it shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment 4. 10. 11. LICENSOR Contact for Emergency: I,~qP, c LICENSEE Contact for Emergency: NOC TELEPHONE NUMBER: 800-638-2822 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 888 - 662 - 4662 12. Special Provisions: LICENSEE will pay a one-time fee to LICENSOR, not to be construed as rent, for reimbursement of LICENSOR's capital costs. LICENSOR encountered extraordinary site build costs in connection with the development &the subject site. LICENSEE agrees to reimburse LICENSOR for a .__~rtion~of said cos?.: LICENSEE's share shall consist of the total payment ~ I Dollvd~~to be paid to AT&T Mobility (via overnight courier) at 8645 154t~ Avenue, NE, Redmond, WA 98052-3564, Re: Site Name East Marion Fire; FA # 10107550, and shall be due upon commencement of this Agreement and pr/or to issuance of the NTP. Remainder o£oaee int~nt~nailv blank · h, uature rage to follow IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written. WITNESS LICENSOR: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC By: AT&T Mobility Corporation Its: Manager PR/NTNAME: Neil C. Boyer TITLE: Director-Network LICENSEE: ~ Northea t LLC BY: ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Legal Description of the Land Attachment 2: Plans and Specifications Attachment 3: Prime Lease Attachment 4: Owner's Consent Attachment 5: Memorandum of SLA StAVe o~ &g~ff~A ~ COLFNTY OF ~WIblbI[~'l~' ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Neil C. Boyer is the person who appeared before me, und said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the insU'ument and acknowledged it as the Director - Network of AT&T Mobility Corporation~ Manager of New Cin~ular Wireless PCS, LLC to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ~ 16, ~ My eo~ission expires I-Ik-~ll k~ 2011 m~ ~ 0?2 ...... STATE OF ~ ) · ... _/ ~. v ' )ss. CO~ OF ~ ) who appeared befo~ me, ~d ~id pemon ac~owledged that he/she si~ this ins~me~fi~ath stated that he/she w~ authori~d to execute the ins~megt ~d ac~owledged it ~ the ~/~ [~ of ~-~ ~ ~ ~t~e ~e ~ee ~d volun~ act of~cfi p~ for the uses ~d pumoses ~enti~in the i~m~[ ~r~t N2~lic - ,,~ -- A~ORN~ AT ~W ~A~ OF ATTACHMENT 1 LEGAL DESCRII:g~ON OF LAND Situate in East Marion, County of Snffolk, State of New York, District 1000, Section 31, Block 3, and Lot 11.031, ~ore particularly described and/or depicted in the Prime Lease attached hereto as Attachment 3. ATTACHMENT 2 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (including description of the antenna location, and location of ground equipment on the ground portion of thc Premises) Proposed Equipment is defined below and Plans and specifications are attached hereto. Number of Antennas: Antenna Manufacturer and Type-Number: Weight and Dimension of Antenna(s) (L x W x D): MW Dish diameter and approved RAID Center: Number of Transmission Lines: Diameter and Length of Transmission Line: Location of Antenna(s) on Tower (Approved RAD Center): Direction of Radiation (Azimuth): Dimensions of LICENSEE Ground Space: Frequencies/Max. Power Output: Additional Equipment to be placed on Tower: Additional Equipment Make/Model and Dimensions: ~hree (3) Andrew TMBXX- 6516 -R214 34.6 lbs~ 59' x 11.9' x 6.3' N/A Twelve (12) 7/8'; +/-105' 87' A~T, 30" / 150" / 270" N/A, Tower 0nly Tx: 1740-1745 & 1860-1870 Rx: 2140-2145 & 1940-1950 MHZ 46 Watts Six (6) 14 lb. TMAS; (3) Andrew, (3) RFS (3) ETW190US12UB 10.2' x 3.7" x 6.7'; (3) ATMAA-1412D-1A20 12" x 10" x 4" Notes: 1. The plans and specifmations attached hereto are provided as SLA attachments only. Approved Final Construction drawings are required prior to commencement of construction. Actual "as built" drawings shall be attached and incorporated herein at the time ct completion of construction. 2. This Attachment is to include any plans for routing lines, utility wires, etc. on or across the Property. 3. Frequency and Power Output Information is provided for purposes of monilorJng compliance with the intederence sections only. ~ST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16"~ 1'-0" ~~O~ ~o~.o~ ~Omipoint ~ ~ SOUTH ELEVATION ,~/~ ~ Eostmon Strut KB GREATRNER.~H739 EAST M~ON ~I 18--~4~A FI~ ATTACHMENT ~ PRIME LEASE The Prime Lease is attached hereto. C~ll ~i~ No. NYCENYI0I 7 Cell Site Name: We~t Orient Point Fixed Asset No. 10107550 Addr.-,~s.- 9245 Main Road. East Marion. NY 11939 SECOND AMENDMENT TO OPTION AND LEASE AGREEMENT THIS SECOND AMEND~ TO OPTION AND LEASE AGRI~I~MEN~r ("Amendment"), dated aa of the lattec of thc signature dates below, is by and between East Marion Fire District, a New York municipal corporation, having a mailing address of PO Box 131, F. SSt Marion, NY 11939 0~ereinafter referttd to as "Landlord") and New Cingular Wireless PCS. LLC, a Delaware lin~ted liability company having a mailing address of 6100 Atlantic Boulevard, Norcross, Georgia 30071 (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant"). WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into an Option and I~asc Agt~nnent dated August 17, 2005, and First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December 7, 2006, whereby Landlord Icasex[ to Tenant c~zta~n P~mise~, tberein c~ril~, that are a po~on of the PreI~rty located at 9245 Main Rood, East Marion. NY 11939 (collectively the Lease and the Amendment are refened to as the "Agreement"); and ~S, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Agreement to modify the Rent Commencement Date and the Rent amount thereof; and WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend thc Agreement to modify the notice section thereof; and WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend thc Agreement to modify the Permitted Uae section thereof; and WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend thc Agreement to pay Landlord's reasonable legal fees in an amount not to exceed in total, upon reasonable proof of the same: and WHEREAS. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend thc Agrecment to modify thc Interference section to address minimizing excessive noise, if any, emanating from thc Communication Facility. WHEREAS. Landlord and Tenant. in their mutual interest, wish to amend the Agreement as set forth below accordingly. NOW ~RE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which a~e hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows: 1. Landlord and Tenant agree that Paragraph 4.(a) of Ihe Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 4.(a) Commencing on the first day of thc month following the dale thai Tenant commences construction (the "Rent Commencement Date"), Tenant will pay to Landlord a annual remal payment of ("Rent"), at the address set forlh above. Dunng any pa~ial years during the Term or any Extension Terms, Rent will be prorated. The initial Rent payment will be forwarded by Tenant to Landlord within thirty (30) days after the Rent commencement Date. 2. Landlord and Tenant agree that Paragraph 2.(d) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 2.(d) Tenant shall install the Landlord's items listed in Exhibit ! to this Amendment, along with associated cabling and mounting hardware, at the Communication Facility. Tenant will also provide a 3' x 5' concrete pad within a fenced area adjacont to Tenant's monopole. Tenant will ensure Landlord's coax is buried in conduit and brought to pad for tie-in to Landlord equipment. In addition, Tenant will provide power and telco conduits from Landlord's designated building located at District 1000, Section 31, Block 3. At Landlord's sole cost and expanse, Landlord has the right to modify, supplement, replace or upgrade the eqmpment listed within Exhibit l, so long as Landlord's modifications do not interfere in any way with Tenant's radio frequency signal, and do no require a structural upgrade, modification to foundation or tower. 3. Landlord and Tenant agree tlmt Paragr~ 24. (i) of the Agreement and Parngrap~ I. of the First Amendment are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following: Tenant agrees to pay Landlord's, reasonable legal fees for the review of the Agreement, this Amendment and reasonable legal fees for securing the Government Approvals to build the Communication Facility contemplated, unde'r the Agreement, including the Certificate of Occupancy. in an amount not to exceed; upon reasonable proof of the same; 4. Landlord and Tenant agree that subparagxaph 8. (e) will he added to the Agreement, providing the following: Throughout the term of the Agreement, Tenant will take reasonable steps to mininuze noise emissions from its Communication Facility. Tenant will take noise emissions readings pre and post installation of its Communication Facility to provide a baseline report. Tenant acknowledges that all equipment will operate within the decibel limits listed in its manufacturer specifications. 5. Notices, Section 17 of the Agreement is hereby ~nended to replace Tenant's Legal Notice address only with the following: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, Arm: Legal 'Department 5 Wood Hollow Road Parsippany. NJ 0?054 Ceil Site No. NYCENYIOI? Cell Sim Name: West Orient Point Fixed Asset No. 10107550 6. Other Terrm and Conditions Remain. In the event of any inconsistencies between tM Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Second Amendment shall control, bi the event of any inconsistencies between the First Amendment and this Second Amendment, the terms of this Second Amendment shall control, Except as expressly set forth in this Second A~drcent, the Agreement and th~ First Amendment, oth~n'wis~ are unmodifi~/and r~maln in full force and eff~t. Each reference in the Agreement to itself shall be d~mnd also to refer to this Sacond Amendment, 7. Capitalism Terms. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have thc same meanings as defined in the Aga~cmenl. IN' wrrNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their pwperly authorized representatives toexecute and seal this Amendment on the dates set forth below. LANDLORD: East Marion Fire District, a New York Title: Date: New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC, By: AT&T Mgt~j~itylCorporation ~ amc: 2_R. 101iCh~i Maus Titl¢: ,Ex, Dir Ny/NJ Network Date: .3- TENANT ACKNOW~MENT ST^T tTeW ) SS: COUNTY OF ~ ) Onthe ~day of I:'e~ in the year 200~ before me, tbe undersigned, personally appea~l ~[~[~q~, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is sul0~cribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument, the individual,or thc pe~-son upon behalf of which the individual acted, execuled the instrument. _] Notary Public / JANETTE ELISE WALSV NOTARY PUBLIC OF NE~& JERSEY ~IY COMr.,'I, tSSiON EXPiRESFErt 20 LANDLORD ACKNOWLEDGh.~..NT (Use fo~ all Landlords: Individual, Corporation, Patmership, etc...) STATE OF ~ ~-f~o~4 ) ) SS: COUNTY OF ~',x--.~¢ ) On the~_~ day of I~k ~,~ in the yem- 200~, before me. the undersigned, peraonally appeared ~-~,~ ¢ (~a,~.,.^ , personally known to me o~ proved Io me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is sul~yribexl to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that be/she.t:x~:ul~d tbe same in hisdber capacity, and that by his/her signatttre on the instrument, tbe ig~tfvidual, of the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, ex~utcd thc Notary Public T,~o;.:.3, P~ '~ .";~ ~f R':,~,t York · 22~: :.':.;' o ..25 g:'h ~[f Cou::ty ~,.':~m~t~;l L,.pir~s A,~.I 30, 2rtt ATTACHMENT 1 MEIvIORANDUM OF LEASE c/o Cin~ulur Wirele~, LLC 6100 Atlamic Boulevard Norcr~, GA 30071 ARm Network Real Estate Administration Re: Cell SRe # NYCENY1017; Cell Site Name: West Orient Poim Fixed Asset Number:. 10107550 Sram: New Yod~ County: SUffolk MEMORANDUM OF LEASE This Memorandum of Lease is entered into on this "~m day of k~.~ .200~__, by and between Fast Marion Fire Dis~ct, a New York municipal corporation, having a mailing address of PO Boy, 131, East Marion, NY 11939 Cncminafter referred to ~s "Landlord") and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address of 6100 Atlantic Boulevard, Norcross, GA 30071 (heminaftm' referred to a~ "Tenant"). Landlord and Tenant entered into a certain Option and Lease Agreement ("Agreement") on the 17th day of August, 2005, as am~ded by that certain Fi~t Amendment to dated the 7~ day of December, 2006, and this Second Atr, e~drnent for the Inu'pose of inatallin8. operating and maintaining a communications facility and other improvements. All of the foregoing are set fo.,~h in the Agn~..rnent. The initial lease term will he five (5) years ("initial Term") commencing on the Effecnive Date ofll~ A~'eemeot. with tour (4) successive five (5) year ol~ions to renew. The portion of ttg land being leased m Tenant (the "Premises") is described in Exhibit 2 annexed hereto. This Memorandum of Leas~ is not intcnd,~l m amend or modify, and shall no~ be duemed or construed as amending or modifying, any of the terms, conditions or provisions of the AgreemenT, all of which are hereby ratified and affirmed. In the event of a conflict heiwe~n the provisions of this Memorandum of Lease ~nd the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of thc A~'eern~nt shall consol. Tho Agreement shall be binding upon and inure ~o the benefit of t~e panics and their respec6ve hei,~, succ~s,sors, and assigns+ subject to provisions o~ the Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the panics have executed ~h{$ Memorandum of Lease as of the day and year first above written. WfTNESSES: Print Name: East lvlarJon Fire DistricL a New York municipal corporation Date: %~'$ ~'~ "TENANT' New Cingular WL',eless PCS, LLC, By: AT&T Mq~ ~cmration Print Nar~: Am,. Micl~a~l Maus lis: Ex. Dir Ny/{q.l Network Date: ~NANT ACKNOWLEDOMENT COUNTY OF ~ F. qq , ) On the~L.~, day of Feb in the year 200~ heroin me, tlm undersigned, personally aFpeared f .fiq ,.~a.~l ~'1~ a.~ , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of safiafactory evidence to be the individual whos~ name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in hi~ner capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person t,q~on behalf of which the individual acted, executed thc instrument. JANETTE ELISE WALEiY NOTARy PUSLIC OF NEW JERSEY ~4Y COMMISSIOn4 EXPIRES FEB 20 2009 LANDLORD ACKNOWLEDGMENT (Use for all Landlords: Individual, Corporation, Pa~nership, etc...) COUNTY OF ~¢"~----- ) S$: ) On the ~ day of b)~,~ in the year 200~_, before n~, the undersigned, personally apl:eared , .. , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be thc individual whose narn~ is subscribed to the within insm~rnent and acknowledged to me that he/she e)~ecuted the same in his/her capacity, and that by his/her signature on th-' instrument, the in~vfdual, or th,' person upon behalf of which the Notary Public EDWARD JOHN tOYD Sth PiGr'~'ty Pubfic STa~ ,~f f,~ew YOtR 02~0J:~73~;2~ Suf:~?~ C,o~nty Com~i~$fon Lxph'ez A~;il' 30, 2~ Y~ Long I.I.nd Quogu~0 NY Mr Ed Boyd 02/1 Antennas for East Marion ere as ~lows: Model Length Height UHF TX Low bend T,X/RX UHF RX UHF TX/RX VI-IF I'X/RX Teleware expose~ dipole 450D6-9' 10 fee{ 30 feet RFS 1142 10 Fee~ 30fe~ Fiber gl~ 3 db Andrew DB633 5 feet Top Fiber g/ars $ db RF$ 201 8 feet 30 Feet Fiber G~aSS 3 D~ Amirew ^~P680 1 'i.7 30 fee~ ' Cou~l be DB 406 ~ 411 ObV~u*'dy this is subject to avaiMlYAity at time of order, but nothing would change by any Orem degre~ in te~ns ~ height, weigl~ or ~ Ioedlno. Eastern Long Island Electronics Cell Site No. NYCENYI017 Market: Tri State East Address: West Orient Point FIRST A31ENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT TillS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT ("Amendment"), dated as of the latter of the signature date~ below, is by and' between East Marion Fire District, a Municipal Corporation, having a mailing address of P. O. Box 131, East Marion, NY 11939, (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord") and New Cingular Wir~leas PCS, I. LC, a Delaware limited liability company having a mailing 'address of 6100 Atlamic Boulevard, Norcross, Georgia 30071 (hereinaR~ referred to as "Tenant"). WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease Agreement dated August t7, 2005, whereby Landlord leased to Tenant cea'rain Premises, therein described, that are a portion of the Property located ~ Main Road, East Marion, NY 11939 ("Agreement~); and WHEREAS, the facility location has changed per the attached Lease Exhibit and WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to angnd the Agreement to modify the notice ~ection thereof; and WHEREAS, Tcoant agre~ to pay Landlord's reasonable legal fees for the submittal and testimony of the File Building Permit Application, File Application for Variance and/or Special Use Permit with the Zoning Board of AP1~ala if necessary, File Application for Sim Plan Approval with the Planning Board, and File ZBA Approval and Site Plan Approval with the Building Deparlment and in an amount not to exceed upon reasonable prunfofthe sam< and WHEREAS, Tenant agrees to pay Landlord's reasonable Radio Frequency enginee~ng fees for the submittal and te~imony in the Town of Southold and in an amount not to exc. egM upon reasonable proof of the same; and WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Agreement to permit Tenant to add, modify and/or replace equipment in order to be in compliance with any current or future federal, state or local mandated application, including but not limited to emergency 911 communication services; and WHEREAS, Landlord and T~t, in their mutual intea:st, wish to amend the Agreement as .~t forth below accordingly. NOW THEREFORE, in consido'ation of the foregoing and other good and valuable considoration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledg~M, Landlord and Tenant a~ee as follows: Ti~NPuNT ACKNO,WLEDGEMENT STATE OF )ss: COU~' OF ~- On tl3e ._~ day of ~ 200/.0 before me personally appeared 7)~n0t~c ~. ~r~ aad acknowledged under oath that . he is the ~.i~,~., ~ J,~,,~,~ , thc ~,~'~ named in thc attached insmune~t, and as~ Such was authorized to execute this instrument on behalf of the _. ' ' ': ' No tic'. '" M; C~ission Expires: LANDLORD ACIOi'OWLEDGEMENT INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF ) ) ss: COUNTY OF ) BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this, day of ,200__ before me, subscriber, a p~rson authorized to take oaths in the State of , ,, personally appear~ who, being duly sworn on hls/h~x/th~r oath, and made proof to my satisfaction that he/she/they is/are the person(s) named in thc within insmunent; and I, having float made lmown to him/h,x/them the contents thereof~ he/she/tho/did acknowledge that he/she/th~ signed, sealed ami delivered the same as his/her/their voluntary act and deed for tho pu~os~s ther~n contained. Notary Public: My Commission Expires: PARTNERSHIP fconsistino of corporate partners) ACKNQWLEDGEMENT STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) I CERTIFY that on .... 2~.__, personally came before me and this/these person(s) acknowledged under oath to my s~tisfaetion, that: (a) thia/th~se person(s) signed, ~eal~l and delivered ~he attached documeant aa _ [rifle] of [name of corporation] a corporation of · which is a general partner of the partnership named in this the State of document; the proper corporam seal of said corporate general panner was affixed; and this document was signed and delivered by the corporation as its voluntary act and deed as Iai general partner(s) on behalf of said partnership [by virtue of authority from its Board of Directors]. Notary Public: My Commission Expir~ C,,ORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT acknowledged under oath that he or she: (a) is tt~ · ~.,,,,~ ..... ,~. __ [title] of [name o£corporafion], the corporation named in the attached instrument, (b) was authorized to execute this inslnm~ent on behalf of the corporation and executed the instrument as the act of gaef~ration. (c) Notary Public My Commission Expires: 02B~0376625 SutlolR Commist,~n [xpire~ APXll 2005 EXHIBIT I-A See attached exhibits comprised of three pages, last revision date, April 12, 2006, prepared by lnflnigy Kng~neering. 1. This Exhibit may be replaced bt' a iand sa'roy and/or ¢o~.sma:iio~ drawings of ~ Premises once it is received by T~t. 2. Any setbac~ of tl~ Fa,;~ses from the Property's boundaries shall be Ihe distance rcquircd by the applicable governmental a~dmriti~s. ~. Width of acccss road simil be the width ~-quired by the applicable ~overm~-~al auth~ ~1~ ~1~ 4. The Iype, number ami mountin~ p~ifiooz a~t locations of antenn~ ~ lra.,mn~ion lines are illusmsfive o~ly. Acma! type~, numbers and mounlm~ posilions may vm,ff from what is shown above. GRAPHIC SCALE ~ ~t SITE LAYOUT '0'I'. ' Ii0 10' , ~ 3~~ .~r :~ ~ SI~ I.D. U-1~7 OPTION ANDLEASEAG~.M~NT THIS OPTION AND LEASE AGREEMI~r ("Agreement"), dated as of the latter of thc signature dates 'below (the "Effective Date"), is entered into by East Marion Fire District, a New York municipal ¢osporation, having a marling address of PO Box 131, East Marion, NY 11939 (hereina/ter referred to as "Lsndlord") and NEW ChNGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, baying a mailin/address of 6100 A/J~ntlc Boulevard, Norcross, Georgia 30071(herdnat~er refexred to as "Tenant'3. BACKGROUND Landlord owns or controls that certain plot, parcel or tra~t of land, together with dl fights and pr/vileges arising in coonection therewith, located at Ma~u Road, East Marion, in the County of ~.ffo~k, State of New York (collectively, the "Property"), District 1000, Section 31, Block 3, and Lot ll.031. Tenant dedms to use a ponSon of the Property in connection with its federally licensed co~iumnications buslv~s. Landlord de~ires to grant to Tenant thc fight to use a portion of the Pwpe~ty in at~ordance w/th t/~ A/re~mgnt. The parties agxee as follows: (a) Landlord grants to T~ent an option (~c "Option") w lease a ~ po~ of ~c ~y ~n~ a~m~ly 350 dc~ on ~ ~ib~ 1,'~ wi~ ~c~a~ ~s for T~'s ~ ~ ~e n~t p~]ic fi~t- of-way al~ ~) ~ &o Op~ ~ ~d ~y ~on &~ ~ ~ ~ t~ of~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~il ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~y t~ ~ o~ ~10~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ (~y, ~ ~''), ~ ~ply ~ ~ o~ lic~, ~, a~m~, or o~ relief ~ of ~ ~ ~ or ~p~e ~ T~t's sol~ ~s~i~ ~r ~, ~ ~on of T~t, ~ n~ ~ T~'s ~l~.~s~ to d~ ~ ph~ ~g~ of ~ ~, Pr~ ~ T~t's P~ pa~y on a~ of ~y ~is~g ~f~ or ~i6on d~ or ~ist~ a ~ c~ of the Op~on T~ (~ defm~ ~ow), ~le w~ aM t~r ~d ~ ~t a~t ~y ~d ~1 init, ~s, a~m.~ or c~ ~ ~ty oa ofT~'s T~a.. of ' ~ilon will ~d ~y ~ paym~ of au addi~i~t ' ' lat~ ~te oft~ ~i~l ~on T~ (fl) 'I'h~ Opt/ell g2ay be sold, assigned or tnmsfer~ed at any t/me b~- Team'at to Tenam's parent company o: m~:mber if Tenant is a limited liability company or any affiliate or subsidiary of, or partner in, Tenant or its pa~mt company or member, or to any third party agreeing to be subject to the terms hereof. Otherwise~ the Option may not be sold, assigned or transferred withou: the written consent of Landlord, such consent not to be unreasombly withheld, conditioned or delayed. From and after tim date the Option has be~a solck assigu~ or tranafen'ed by Tenant to a th/rd party agreeing to be subject to the terms hereof, Tezmnt shall immediately be released from any and alt liability under this Agree, mant, including the payme~ of any rental or other sums due, without any further action. (e) During the Initial Option Term and any extension thereof, Teaumt may exeroise the Option by notifying Landlord in writing. If Tenant exercises the Option then Landlord leases the Premises to the Te~mnt subject to the tea-ms and conditions of this Agreement. If Tenant does not exerefise the Option during the Initial option Term or any extemion thereof, this Agreement will terminate and the parties will have no further liability to each other. (t) ff during the Initial Option Term or any evaemfion thereof, or doring the term of this Agreement if the Option is exerted, Landlord decides to subdivide, sell or change the ~tatua of the zoning of the Premises, Property or any of Landlord's contiguous, adjoining or surrounding propeW] (the "$urroaedlng Property," wh/ah includes (without llrnitat,{Oll) the reermlnder of the structure) or in the event of foreclosure, Landlord shall immedialely notify Tenant/n writing. Any sale of the Property shall be subject to Tenant's right~ under ~ Agr~emt~. I~ndinrd agre~ that during the Initial Option Term or any extension thereof, or during the Term of this Agreement if the Option is exercised, Landlord flaall not init/ate or eonsent tO any e2mnge in the zoning of the Pretnises, property or Surrounding Property or impcae or cement to any other testriotinn that would prevmt or limit Te~nt from ming the Premises for the uses intend~xl by Tenant as hereinafter set forth in this Agreement. (a) Tenant may use the Premises for the transmission and reception of co,~,~,,.,ications signals and the imtallatico, construaiun, ms_~utenance, operation, repair, xg'placm~.-nt and upgrade of its communications fixtures and related ~qalpraemt, cables, accessories and improvements, which may include a sult~ble support structure., associated antennas, I beams, equipment sb. dtera or cabinets and £en~ng and any other ii.as necessary to the ~e~e~ful and secure uae of the Premhes (collectively, the "Communleatlon Facility"), as well as thc fight to tm, survey and rev/en~ title on the Property; Teaant further has th~ tisht but not the obligetion to add, modify and/or n~phoe equipm~m in order to be in compliance with any cusrent or future federal, state or local mandated application, including, but not l/mired to, emergency 911 eomrn*m;o~*~/on se~tices, at no add/tiormI cost to Tenant or Landlord (collectively, the "Permitted U~e"). Land. lord and Tennn~ agree that any portion of the Core, ram!cation Facility that may be conceptually described on F.,.~iblt I will not be deemed to limit Tenant's Permitted Use. If Exhibit 1 includes drawings of the initial instdhtion of tho Coramuniuation Facility, Landiord's execution of this Agreement will signify Landlord's approval of Exlflbit 1. Tenant has the r/ght to install mz/operate transmission cables from the equipment shelter or cabine/to the antennas, elech/c tines fi'om thc main feed to the equipmant shelter or cabinet and coran-w.uiuation lines from the main entry point to the equipment shelter or cabinet, and to make Property improvements, alterations, upgrades or additions appropriate for Tenant*s nsc (~Tenant Clia~ges"). Ta~ant Changes include the fight to construct a fence around the Premises a~A undertake any other appropriate means to secure the Premises. Tenant a~u'ees to comply with all applicable gov~z~enlal laws, rules, statot~ and r~$ulations, relating to its use of the Communication FaCility on the Propexty. Temant I~s the right to mod/fy, suppIeraent, replace, upgnuic, expam/the equipment, increase the number of antennas or ~locate the Communication Facility wifffin ~ Premise~ at any time during the tam of this Agreement. Truant will be allowed to make such alterations to the Prope~y in order to accomplish Tenant's Changes or u~ insure that Tenant's Communication Facility complies with ail applicable federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. In the event Tenant desires to modify or upgrade the Comm~mleat/on Fadlity, and Tenant requires an additional portion of the Propexty (thc "Additional Prem/ses') for such modification or up/zade, Landlord agrees ~o ~ease to Tenant the Addltiomfl Pmn/ses, upo~ the same terms and conditions set forth he~ exc~ that thc Rant ~ll increase~ in conjunction w/th the lease of the Additional Prem/s~ by reasonable/m~otu~t consistent with rental rates then ch,~'ged for comparable portions of r~[ pwpen~ being/n thc same area. Landlord a~rees to take such actions and enter into and deliver to Tenant such documents as Tenant rea.~nably r~quests in order to effect end memorialize the leaze of the Additional Premises to Tenant (b) Prior to tho initial installation of Tenant's Changes, Tenant will supply the Landlord with plans and specifications ("Plans") to he reviewed and at~proved by ~bo Ler~iord pri~r to commencement C-'henries, Landlord's approval will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed (and in no event delayed [~yond tea (10) days). After landlord's (i) failure to respond in writing to Tenant's proposed Plans w/~'hl. tea (10) da~ of their recipe; or (ii) faiiurc to provide a written response within five (:~) days of receipt of Plans revised by Tenant after ~ommcat from Landlord in accordance with this paragraph, the Plans w/Il be deemed approved. After approval or deemed approval, thc Plans will be considered incorporated in this A4~eement as Exhibit 1. If the Landlord disapprov~ the Plans then the Te~*~t will provide the Landlord with revised Plans, such revisions to bo within T~znt's reasonable di~l~on. In the event Landlord disapproves of the Plans upon a second (2nd) submi~ion, Testat may t~'mlnate this A~recngaL Landlord will not knowingly pa'mit or suffer any ~ to copy or utilize the Plans for any purple other than as provided in t~ Agreement and will return the Phn~ to Tenant promptly upon request. (c) Tenant shall install wiring and related cablins for Landlord's tingle-phase generator for the us~ by Landlord end Tenant; cos~ of instai/ation shall not exceed' (d) L~nd!ord shall provide and install eke iteana listed in I~.-h~'~it 2 at the above mentioned Coam,urdoation Facility loca~d at Dis~ic~ 1000, Section 31, Block 3, and Lo~ 11.031. Landlord has the right to modify, supplem~t, replace or upgrade tho equipment listed wi~in Exlflblt 2, so long as Landlord's modification do not /ntedere/n any way with Teaant's radio frequency signal, instalhtion as identified in Exhibit 1~ and remain within the space/ndicated on Exh/bit 2. ~f Landlord changes requ/ro a stru~nsal up/rads, modification to foundation or towcr, changes will be at iumdlord's sole cost and expense, 3. TERM, (a) The initial lease term will be five ($) years ("Initial. Term"), conwaancing on the effective date of written nm/ftc, at/on by Tena~ to Landlo~/, of Tenant's cxcrclan of the Opt/on (thc "Term Couaaenccme~ Date"). The Initial To'Tn will to. rmin~ on the fiRh ($~ annual .m~ivm~ary of tho Term Cogent Date. (b) Th/s A~enment will automatically r~ew for four (4) add/tionai five (5) year term(s) (each ~ve (5) year term shall be defined as the "Extension Term**), upon the same terms and conditions unle~ the Tenant not/ties ~ Landlard/n writing of Tenant's intention not to renew tiffs A~recment at least sixty (00) days pr/or ~o fl~e expiration of the existing Te~n. (c) If, at leas~ sixty (60) days prior to the end of the fourth (4') extemded tern'~ c/that I' ~,~,Oord or Tenant Ires ~ g/yen the other wri~en notice of its desire tha~ the term of this Agreemen! end at the ex~h'afion of the Fourth (4~) .extended term, then upon the expiration of the fourth (4~) attended term this Agreement shall continue in force upon the same covenants, tram and conditions for a furthe~ term.of one (l) year, and for annual term~ thereafter unt/] to*nsinated hy e/that party by g/ring to the other written notice of its intention to so terminate at least six {'6) moatbs pr/or to the e~d of any anch annual term. Monthly rents/dudng such armual terr~ shall be equal to the rent paid for the last munth of the fourth (4*) exte~ied terr~ If Tenan! rema/~s in possession of the Prem/s~ after the term/nation of tiffs Agreen~nt then Teru~ will be deemed to be occupying the premu~es on a month to month basis (the "Holdover Term*), subject ~o the terms and condkions of th/s (d) The Init/al Term, the Extension Term and the Holdover Term are collectively referred to as the Term ("Term"). 4. RENT. 3 (a) Commencing on thc first day of th~ month fo[lowing th~ daI~ that T~mant ............ '~t"), at ~ a~s s~ fo~ a~ve, ~ wi~n ~ (30) ~ys a~ ~e a~t Co~ ~) h ~ ~o (2) of ~ hifid T~ ~d ea~ y~ ~cr, ~lu~ t~u~m ~y Bxt~ion Te~ exe~, the y~ly ~t ~H ~se by ov~ ~e R~t p~d d~! ~e p~s y~. (c) ~ ~t or o~ c~ p~y~le ~ ~s ~ ~1 ~ bill~ ~ ~rd (1) ~ ~m ~e ~d of ~ cM~ y~ in w~ch ~e ~g~ w~ ~; ~y c~g~ Myo~ ·hall ~t ~ b~l~ by ~o~ ~ s~ not ~ pa~ble by T~. ~ p~i~ of ~e ~g sent~e ~1 starve ~e t~i-a~ or ~on of~ ~t. APPROVALS, (a) Landlord agre~ that Tenant's ability to use the Premise~ is contingent upon th~ suitability of the Premiles for Tenant's Pm~nitted Use and Te,,mm's ability to obtain amd maintain all Oovernm~t Approvals. Landlord authorizes Tenant to prepare, exe~mte and ~e all required applications to obtain Gova'nmant Approvals for Tenant's Permitted Use under this Agreement and agrees to reasonably assist Tanant with such applications and with obtaining and maintaining the Government Approvals. (b) Te~,umt has the r/ghi to obtain a tltle n~t)ort or comm/iment for a leasehold title pollcy from a tiff~ insurance company of its choice and to have the Property surveyed by a surveyor of Teaant's choice. In the event T~nan~ detemgn~, in its sol~ d/sorelion, due to the title report resulis or ~u'~ey results, that the condition of the Premise~ h unsatisfactory, Tenant will have the right to t~nate Chis Agreem~ upon notice to Landlord. (c) Tenimt may also perform and obta/n, at Teaant's sole cost and expe~c, soil bodri~ percolation tests, migne, a~ procedures, env/ronmemal investigation or other t~ts or reports on, over, and under the Property, nece~aty to d~tennin~ if the Tanan~'s use of the Premises will be compat/ble with T~snt's ell~illeering specifications, system, des/Ell, operations or ~ovemment Approvals. ~ This Al~m~mt may b~ i~,-h~ina~d, without panal~y or ~ liabfli~, ~ ~llows: P~h 15 De~t ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~H~ble ~ ~) ~ T~t ~n ~ nog~ t0 ~o~, if T~ ~ ~ble ~ ob~n, or r~ a~o~(s) or ~ iss~ of a ~ or ~t by ~y ~, ~ ~ or o~ gov~ au~ n~ for ~ ~gon or ~tinn of ~ ~~ F~fli~ ~ now or h~ by T~; ~ if T~t ~ ~ its sole ~ ~t ~ cost of ob~ ~ ~ ~ ~ is ~mm~ ~ble; (c) by T~ u~n ~ ~fice ~ ~o~ f~ ~ ~, ~ ~y ~ p~or ~ ~~t of ~on by T~ or (d) bY T~t upon sixty (~) ~ ~ ~m nofi~ ~ ~o~ f~ ~y ~so~ so ~g ~ T~ ~ys ~10rd a t~ti~ f~ ~u~ ~ ~ (3) ~ R~t, at ~ ~ ca~t ra~ p~, howev~, ~o su~ t~tion f~ a411 ~ payable on ~ou~ of~ t~n offs A~t by T~nt ~d~ ~y or ~ of P~p~ 5~) ~pm~ls, 6(a) T~fion, ~) T~tio~ 6(c) T~tion, 8 1 l(d) ~, 18 Sev~bHi~, 19 ~e~a6on or 20 C~ of ~ (a) Ta--~t will can-y dt~ing the T~ at its o~ ~S ~ ~ flic fol~w~g ~: (i) "~ ~' p~y ~ for i~ ~'s ~h~ ~t; (ii) ~i~ ~n~ lhb~ ~ ~ a ~mn ~t of habfli~ of $5,0~,~ comb~ ~e l~t f~ ~y ~j~ or d~ ~ ~g out of ~my ~ o~ ~d (fii) Wo~' Com~afi~ ~ ~ r~ by law. ~ ~v~ge 4 ' afforded by Tenant's commercial general llabilityinavxan.: r, hall apgl7 {o Landiord ~ afl additional imur~, but only with mi'peet to Landlord's liability arisin$ out of its inte, rc~ in ~c Pi-ot~ny. Co) Tenant shall haw the Hght to self-/usure with respect to any of th, above imurance requircmema~ 8. INTERFERENCE, (a) Wl~re there are existing radio t~equency user(s) on tho Propony, the Landlord will provide Tcrant with a list of all existing radio frequency user(s) on the Property to allow Tenant to evaluate the potential for interfcmnca. Tenant warcants that its uso of the Prelniae~ will not interfere with existing radio froqu~lcy user(s) on the Property so disclo~:d by Landlord, a~ long aa the existing radio fmqueacy user(s) op,zrate and continue to operate within their respective frequencies and in acconlar, ce with all applicable Jaws and regulations. {b) Landlord will not graat, after the date of this Agreement, a lesso, he. ease or any 0ther right io any third party for the use of the Property, if such use may in any way adversely affect or interf~ with the Communication Facility, the operatinns of Tenant or the fights of Tenant under this Agreement. Landlord will notify 'l'em~n~ in writing prior to granting any third pariy the riglat to install: er~d operate eommuninations extuipmem on the Property. (c) Landlord will not use, nor will Landlord p~rmil its employees, te~an~s, licensees, invitees or a~nts to use, any portion of the Property in any way which interfere~ with the Communication Facility, the operatioas of Tenan! or the rights of Tenarit raider this AgresulenL Landlord will cause such inteneerence to cease within meaty-four (24) hours after receipt of notice of interf,~,~,ce from Tenant. In the event any such inierfereoce does not cease within the aforenl~ltlioned cure period therl ~ parties acknowledge that Tenant will suffer irreparable injury, and there, fore, Tenant will have the fight, in addition to any oilier ri~oht~ that it may have at law or in equity, for Landiord's breach of this Agreement, to elect to enjoin such interference or to this Asroemont upon notice to Landlon:L (d) The installation, maintenance and operations of the Coma-miuation Facility wli1 not inm-fere with tl~ Landlord's existing emergency equipm~t or operations within the l~'openy. Ia the ev~t Tenant's installations interfere with the Landlord's equipment or operatious, Tenant will imn'~iately c~ae such interference, after notice thereof uatil it is able to reaolv~ the problem. It' the inierference cannot be resolved, either party will be entitled to terminate this Agreement and tender it null and void. (a} Tenam agr~s to indmamify, defend and hold Landlord herml~.s f~m and agaimst any and all injury, Ioss~ dnn~qSe or liability (or any claims in respect of the ~regoing), cosis or expenses (inoludlng reasonable attorneys' fees and court coats but e~eludiag real prope~y or lx;rsonal property taxes) arlaing dir~tly from the ins~afion, use, maintemmce, repair or ~,,~vei of the Co~r,~,micatiori Facility or Tenant's breach of any provision of this Agrcem~t, except to the extent attributable to the negligent or intmtional act or omission of Landlord, its employes, agents or independent corarectom. Co) Landlord agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Temmt harmless from ami against any and all injury, loss, damage or liability (or any. claims in respe~ of the foregoing), costs or expenses (including reasonable aitomcys' fees aud court coats but cxclnding real pwporty or personal property taxes) arising directly from the actiom or failure to act of Landlord or its m,~,loyces or agants, or Landlord's breach of any provision of this Asreement, cxcapt to the ~xtcnt atlributsble to the negligent or intentional act or omission of Tenant, its employees, agents or independem comm. (c) Notwitl~standing anything to the contrary in this A~ccment, Tea~ant and Landlord each waives any claims that each may lmve against the other with respect to consequential, incidental or special damages, 10. WARRANTIF~. (a) T~numt and Landlord each ackno~ledga and rcpt-esent that it is duly org~ni:,~i, validly ~tisting and in good standing and has thc rig~at, power and authority to ~mter into this Agreement and bind itself tm'oto through the party set forth as signatory for th,' party below. (b) Landlord rep~r~ and warrants that: (i) Landlord sulcly owns thc Property as a legal lot in fee simple, or conimls the Property by lease or license; (ii) file Prop~y is not cncumb~ed by any ticm, r~sUictions, mortgages, covcnsnts, condit~olls, eaaenaeIl~S, leases, or my other agreements of rccord or not of record, which would adver~ly afft:~'l Tenant's Permitied Use and c~joymcnt of the Pr~mises under this Al/rccment; (iii) as long as Tcnsnt is not in d~fault then Landlord/rants to Te, nnr~t sole, actual, quiet and peaceful use, enjoyment and possession of thc Premises; (iv) Lsadlord's execution and perform~nee of this Agreement will not violate any laws, ordinances, covenants or the provisions of any mortgage, lease or other agreement binding on the Landlord; and (v) if the Property is or becomes encumbered by a deed lo secure a debt, mortgage or other security interest, Landlord shall provide promptly te Tenant a mutually agreeable Subordination, Non-Disturbance and Attommcnt Agreement. (a) ][~ndlord represents and warrants that the Propcrty is frec oftm?_~rdous substance~ as of the date of this Agreement, and, to the best of Landlord's knowledge, the Property has never been subject to any eontlmjuation or hezardous conditions resulting in any environmental investigation, iuqulry or reanediation. Landlord and Teeant agree that each wilt ;ac ~ible fox compliance with any and aL1 environmental and industrial hygiene laws, including any rogulatinns, guidelines, standards, or policies of say governmental authorities regulatinI or imposint ~tandards ef liability or $tandaats.of conduct with regard to any environm~al or industrial hygiene condition or other matters as may now or at any time herenfter be in effect, that arc now or were related to that party's activity conducted in or on the Property. 0a) Landlord and Tenant agree to held harmless and indemnify the other fror~ and to aasumc all duties, responsibilities and liabiiitles at the sole cost and expense of the indemnifying pa.~ for, peymant of penalties, sanctions, forfeitures, losses, costa or d~,r.~es, and for responding to any action, notice, claim, order, sumn~ns, cL'~tion, directive, litigation, investi~tion or proceeding which is related to (i) the indemnifying party's failure to cot~ly with any anvironmental or industrial hygiene law, including without limitation any rcguhtions, guidalines, standard~ or policies ofauy governmental authorities regulating or imposing standards of liability or standards o£ condu¢! with regard to any cnviwomental or industrial hygiene conditions or matters ns may now or hereafter lac in effect, or (ii) any environmental or indusl~'ial hy~ene conditions thai arise out of or are in any way related to the Condition of tile Property and n~tivities conducted by the party thereon, unless the cnvirenmantal conditions are caused by the echer perry. (¢) The i_,xicm,'fifications of this Peragraph I f Environmental spacifisally include reasonable costs, expcnse~ and fees incurred in connection with 'any investigation of Proper~ conditions or any clean-up, remediation, removal or restoration work required by any gova~tentnl authority. Thc provisions of this Paragraph I'1 Environmental will survive thc cxplration or tcrmination o~ tl~ Ag~x~ment. (d) In the event Tenant becomes aware of any hazardous materials on the Properly, or any enviroomenml or industrial hy~ia-~ condition or matlcr relating ~o thc Proper~ that, in Tenant's sole determination, renders the Condition of' the Premises or Property unsuitable for Tenant's nsc, or if Tenant believes that the lessin~ or continv~cl leasin~ of the Premises would expose Tenant to tw-due risks of govemmc~ action, iniervenfion or third-party liability, Tenant will have thc ri~t, in addition to any other rights it may have at law or in equity, to tern~nate the Agreei~..nl upon uotice to Landlord. 12. ACCESS.' At all thncs throughout the Term of thii Agreerac~, and at no additional charge to Tenant, Tenant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors, will have twonty-four (24) hour per thy, seven (7) day per week pedes~.rian and vehicular aceess to and over the Property, from an open and improved public road to th-- Pr~nises, for the installation, tnfintc~iat~ and operatinn of the Communication Facility and any utilities s~"ving the Premises, Landlord grants to Tenani an eascmem for such access sad Landlord agr~ to provide to Tenant such codas, keys and other insmimenis necessat7 for such access at no additional cost to Tenant. Upon T~ant's request, Landlord will execute a separate rccordable casement evidencing this right, In the event any public ufihty is unable to use th~ access or easement provided to Tanant then thc Landlord agrees to gran~ additional access or a~ easement either to Tenan! or to the public utility, for the bc.,~fit of' Tenant, at no cost to Tenant. 13. REMOVAL/RESTORATION. All portions of the Communication Faa/lily brought omo ~ P~perty by Tenant will b~ and rea~in T~'~ant's personal prope~:y and, at Te~mfs option, may be vemowcl by Temmt at any tlm~ du6ag ~¢ Terra, cxcludlng the towe~. Landlord coveaan~s and agre.~s that no part of ~ Commtmicafion Facility coratrueted, ereetrxl or pin.i, on the Premises by Tenant will be~ome, or be considered as being affixed to or a pan of; the Protmay, it being the sp~fie intention of the Landlord that alt improvements of every kind and nature constructed, erected or placed by Tenant on the Premises will be and remain the pmpeaty of the Teamnt and may be removed by Tev. ant at any time during the Term. Within one hundred twenty (120) days of the termination of this Agreement, Tenant will remove all of Tenam's above-ground improvements and Tenant will, to the extent reasonable, restore the Premises to its condition at the commencem~t of the Agreement, reasonable wear and tear and lo~s by casualty or other causes beyond Tenant's control excepted, Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant will not be r~sponsible for the replacement of any trees, shrubs or other vegetation, nor will Tenant be required to reraove from the Premisos or the Property any foundations or undorground utilities. Upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement, whichever shall be tho sooner, Tenant shall remove its ~quipment from the tower and the parties agree that the tower will automa~.ally become the property of Landlord. Landlord will not be required to give any additional consideration to Ten.hi for the tramfer of ownership. Furthermore. the parties agree that no fur~her ivstmment shall be required to transfer ownership of the tower to Landlord. All further obligations and responsibilities for rrmlntaibing the tower will transfer to Landlord. (a) Texmnt will keep and maintain the Premises in good condition, reasonable wear and tear and damage f?em the elements excepted. Landlord will maintain and repaix the Prop~ty and access there~ in good and tenantable condition, subject to rceaonable wear at~d tear and damage from the el~. Co) Tanant will be responsibl~ for paying on a monthly or quar~rly basis all utilities charges for electricity, telephone service or any other utility used or consumed by Tenant on tho premises. Ia the ~a~at T~nant cannot s~eure its own metered electrical supply, Tannnt will have the fight, at its own cost and expense, to subme~er from the Landlord. When submetedng is necessary and available, Landloni will read the meter on a monthly or quarterly basis and provide Tenant with th~ n~saary naag~ data ill a timely rnammr to enable Tenant to compute such utility charges. Failure by Landlord to perform this function will limit utility fcc recovery by Landlord to a 12-month period. Landlord will fully cooperate with any utility company requesting an ca~raent oven', under and across the Property in order for the utility company to provide service to the Tcalant. Landlord will rot be responsible for interference with, interruption of or failure, beyond the reasotmble control of Landlord, of such services to bu furnished or supplied by Landlord. 15. I~EFAULT AND mGH.T .TO, CURE. (a) The fullowing w~ be de~ pa~t of~t ff su~ R~t ~ ~p~d for ~ ~ ~ (30) ~y~ ~ ~pt of ~ nofi~ ~m ~ord of such f~ to pay; or (ii) T~t's faille to p~o~ ~y ~ ~tMn fo~y-fi~ (45) ~ys ~ch f~l~, how~, ~ be d~ and pro¥id~ ~t such effo~s ~ pm~t~ ~ cool,on wi~ ~blc dilig~. ~ay ~ ~ a d~uli ~H be ex~us~ if due to ea~ beyo~ ~y a~lkable c~e p~i~ Mn~0rd will ~ve ~e fi~t ~ ex~c2e ~y ~d ~ figMs ~ r~ a~lable to it under Mw ~ ~uity. (b) The followMg will be d~d a de,Mt by ~dlord fa~urc to p~fo~ any te~ ~Mifi~ or brach of ~y ~ly or covet ~d~ ~s A~ wi~ f~- five (43) ~ a~er ~pt of w~tt~ noti~ ~m T~t ~i~8 ~c ~ilm. No s~ f~l~ ~w~. will be d~ to ~ if ~dloM ~s ~ to p~cut~ to ~l~i~ wi~ ~ble dHig~ce. ~ay in c~ng a de,Mt w~ bcyoM tM maso~blc ~n~ol of ~dlord. If L~oM 7 Tenant will have the right to ,xercize any and all rightz available to it uniter law a~d equity, inoh,4;-S th~ rlght to cmo Landlord's default and to deduct the c.o~t~ of such cure from any moni~ dun to Landlord from Teamnt. 16. ASSIGNMENTISUBLEA~I~, Tenan~ will have the right to z.q~iSn, sell or tranzfer its iatere~ und~ this Agreement without the al~roval or coment of L~!ord, to T~mw.t's pm or memb~ company or any affiliam or subsidiary of; or partner in, Temnt or its parent or mernber company or to an), e~ity which acquires all or substantially all of the T~mt's assets in the market defined by the Federal Commmficatioas Commission in which the P~ is located by reason of amm, g~, acquisition, or oth~r business r*orgim/zntion. Upon notifcation to Landlord of such a~signment, ~ransfer or ~ale, Tenant will be relieved of all future performatme, liabilities and obligafiom under this Agreement.. Truant shall have the right to sublease the Premizes, in whole or in part, with Landlord's consent, which will not be mue~sonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Tenant may not othenvise a~sign this Agreement without Iaadlord's consent, Landlord's consent not ~o be unreazonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 17. NOTICES, All notices, requests, demands and enmmunicatiom het~'und= will be gives by first class certified or registered mail, r~tom receipt r~lu~ted, or by a nationally recognized overnight courier, postage pr*paid, to be ¢ffecti¥o wl~n prop*dy sent and received,, refused or r~turnod undeliv~red. Notices will b~ address~ to the parti~ as follows: If to Tea~.nt: c/o Cingular Wireless LIE Arm: Nettrek ~ Eslma Administration Re: Ceil Site b'NYCI~N'YI017; Cell Site Name: Wesl Orient Point 6100 Atiantla Boul~ml Norcross, GA 30071 With a copy to: Cingular Wlreless LLC Am: Legal Department Re: Cell Site gliYCENY1017; Cell Site Name: West Orient Point 1 $ E Midland Avenue Paramua; NS 07652 If to Landlord: East Marion Fire District PO Box 131 East Marion, NY 11939 Either party hereto may change the place for the giving of notice to it by thirty (30) days prior written notice to thc other ~ providad h~rein. 18; SEVERABILITY. If any term or condition of this Agreement is found unenforceablc, thc renminhlg tcmm and .conditions will remain binding upon thc parties as though said ummforo~ablc provision wer~ not contained herein. However, if the invalid, illegal or unenfo~le provision materially alfa'ts this ~ then the Agreement may be terminated by either pmt~y on ten (I0) bus/nas days prior written notica to the oth~ party hereto. 19. CONDEIV~.ATION? In thc event Landlord receives ~tiflca~inn of any condamn~ion proceedings affecting the Property, Landlord will prey/de notice of th~ pro~dlng to Tenant withia forty-eight (48) hours. If a condemn/nS author/ty takes all of the Property, or a por~on sufficient, ht Tenant's sole daterm/nat/on, to render the Premises unsuitable for Temmt~ this Agreement will terminate as of the date the fftle vests in the condemning authority. The pani~ will each be entitled to pursue their own ~ep~ate awards in the condemnation proceeds, which for Tenant will include, wher~ applicable, thc value of i:s Commutfic~tion Facility, pre. paid Rent, and business dislocation ~, provided that any award to Teaaant wilt not diminish Landlord's recova'y. Tenant will be entitled to reinaburseme~t for any prepaid Rent on a prorata basis. 20. CASUALTY. Landlord will provide notice to Tenant of any casualty affecting tbe Properly within forpy-eJ, ght (48) hours of'he casualty. If any part of thc Communication Facility or Pro~rty is damaged by fire or other casualty so as to re~ler the Premises unsuitable,, in Tenant's sole determination, then Testat n-my terminale this Agreement by providing wdttan notice to the Landlord, which termination will be effective as of the date of such damage or destnmtion. Upon such term/tuition, Tamnt will be entitled to collect all insurance prnoeeda payable to Tenant on account thereof and to be reimbursed for any prepaid Rent on a prorata basis, If notice of termination is given, or if Landlord or Tenant undertake to rebuild the Communications Facility, Landlord aggross to uae its reasonable efforts to permit Tenant lo place temporary tra~missioa and reception facilities on the Property at no additional Rent until such time as Temmt is able to s~re a replacement transmissiun location or the reconstruction of the Communication Facility is completed. 21. WAIVER OF LA~NDLORD'S LIENS, Landlord waives any and all lice rights it may have, statutory or otherwise, coi~'rfing tho Communication Fac'~y or ealy portion thereef. Th~ Commtmie, atlon Facility shall be deemed personal propo'~ ilar purposes of this Agreement, regardless of whether any portion is deemed teal or pe~onal property under applicable law, and Landlord consents to Terumt'a right to remove all or any portion of th~ Communication Facility from time ~o time in Tenant's sole discretion ~nd without Landlont's consent. 22. TAXES, Landlord shall be responsible for payment of all ad valorem taxes levied upon the lands, L'nprovera~m and other property of I.~dlord. Tenant shall be responsible for all taxes levied upon Tanant'a le.~suhold improvements (including Tenant's cquipmcot building and tower) on the Leased Property, shall provide Tenant w/th copies of all assessment notices on or including the Leased Prop~'ty/mm~lfatoly upon receipt, but in no event less than seve~ (7) business days a/~er receipt hy Landlo~l. L~ Landlord fails to provide such not/ce with/n such time flame, Landlord sh~ll be rasponsible for all increesas in taxes for the year covered by the assessment. Tenant shall have the right to contest,/n good faith, the validity or the amount of any tax or assessmant levied against the Leased Property by such appellate or cahar proceedings as may be appropriate in the jorisdiaion, and may defer payment of such obligatiom, pay same under protast, or tak~ such otigr ~tops as Tenant may deem appropriate. Th/s right shall include th~ ability to institute any legal, regulatory or/nformal action in thc name of !~ndlord, Tenant, or both, with r~speet to the valuation of thc Leased Property. Landlord e~all cooperate in the institution and prosecution of any such proce~xlings and will execute any documen~ requ'~ed thexefor~. The exp~asc of any such prnooed/~gs shall be borne by Tea,ant and any refunds or rebates so~-ured as a reauh o£T~,~,~t's act/on shall belong to Tenant. 23. SALE OF. P~RQ~pERTY. If Landlord, at any time during the Term of this Agre~n~ decides to sdl, subdivide or rezone any of the Premises, all or any part of the Property or Surrounding Prop~my, to a tmrchaaer other than Tenant, Landlord shall promptly not/fy Tenant in writing, and such sale, subdivision or re'zoning shall be subject to this Agreement and Te. usnt', fights hereunder, I,andlord agrees not to sell, lease or use any areas of the Property or Surrounding Property for the installation, operation or maintenance of other wifeless corm'nunications facilities if such installation, operation or mainte~a,~e.e would interf~e with Tenant's Pemaitted Use or communications equipment as determined by radio propagation tests performed by Tenant in its sole discretion, any such testing to be at the expense of Landlord or Landlord's prospective purchaser, and not Tenam, If the radio frequency propagation test~ demonstrate levels of interference unaccq~table to Tenant, Landlord shall be prohibited from selling, leasing or using any arena of the Property or the Stwrounding Properly for purposes of any installation, operation or maintenance of any other wireless communications fac/lily or equipma'a. Landlord shall nol be prohibited fi'mn the selling, leasing or use of any of thc Property or thc Surrounding Property for non- wirel~l co,'nmun/c~t/on use~ In:the event t/~ Property is wansferm/, the n~w landlord sha/l ~ a t/m, of tach ~msf/r to pw~id, T~mant ~,,/th a ~ompl~ted IRS Form W-9, or it~ ~invalem. and oth~r paper work to effect a transfer in Pent m tho acw landlord. The provisions of this Paral~ph 23 sllal[ limit or impair the obligatiom of Landlord under Paragraph ~ above. (a) Amendment/Wa/vur. This Agreement cannot be amended, modified or revised unless done in writing and s~gned by aa authorized agr~t of the Landlord and an authorized agcnt of thc T~nsnt. No provision may be waived ~xcept in a writing signed by both partic*. 0a) Memoraladund/thort l%rm Lease. Either party wili, at any 0me upon fifteen (15) business day~ prior written notice from the other, execute, acknowledge /md del/vet to the other a recordable Memorandum or Short Form of Lease. Either party may record this Memorandum or Short Form of Lea~ at any time, ill its ab~lute discretion. {o) Bind and BeneflC Tho tern~ and condit/onn comained in thin Agreement will nm with the Property and bind and inure to the benefit of the partie~, their respective he/rs, executom, administrators, successors end a~sigos, (d) Entlr, Agreement. Th/s Agreement end th~ exh/bits attached l~eto, all being a part hereof, con.stinlte the entire agreelr/erlt of the pnrtie.~ heteto ~ will supersede all prior of/em, negotiations and agreements with respect to the subject mattet of this Agreement. (e) Governing Law. T[ds Agreement will be governed by thc laws of the state in wh/ch tie ?mmiso~ are located, without regard to conflicts of law. (f) Interpr~taflom Unless othea'wlse spec/fled, the following mica of eonatrm~ion and interpr~at/on apply:. (i) captions ate for convenience and ref~enoe only and in no way define or 1/mit construction of the terms and conditiom hereof; (ii) use of the term "Luclva!n~_" w/Il lac/uterpreted to mean "including but not limited to"; (iii) whenever a partes consent is requ/red mxler th/s Agreement, except as otherwise stated in the Agreement or as same may be duplicative, such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, cond/tiuned or delayed; (iv) exhibits are en integral part of the Agreemem and are/nnor~rated by reference into this Agreement; (v) use of the terms "termi~t/on" or "expiration" ttre intenfl~angenble; end (v/) reference to a default will take into conaiderat/on any applicable not/ce, gace and cure perind~. (g) Estoppel.. Either pan'y w/ii, at any time upon twanty (20) budneas days prior wr/tten nofio~ from the other, execute; acknowledge and deliver to the other n stat~rt~mt in writing (i) cerdf~'ing that th.in A.gre~nent /s -nm~dLfied and in full force and effect (or, if modified, stating th~ nature of such modification ~ e,e~t~fing this Agreement, as so modified, is in full force and effect) and the date to wkioh the Rent and other e, hargea are paid in advance, if any, and (i/) acknowledging that t.here s. re not, to such party's knowledge, any uncured defaults on the part of the other party heramder, or $pcoify/ng such defaults if my are claimed. Any such statement may be conclusively relied upon by any prospect/ye purchasur or enenmbran¢~' of the Prom/sea. The requited party's failure to deliver such a statement withiu such t/me will be conclusively mi/ed upon by the requesting party that (i) thin Agreement ia in full force and e. fl'~ct, without modification except as may be properly represented by the requesting party, (ii) there ar~ no unatred defanlts/q either party's performance, and (iii) no more than one month's Rent has been pa/d in advance. (h) No Eleetron/e SignaturdNo Option. The subm/s~ion of th/s Agreement to any party for examination or consideration does not constitute an offer., reservation of ur option for the Prem/ses based on the terms set forth herein. This ^greement will become effeciivo as a binding Agreement only upon tho handwritten legal execution, acknowiedgmant and delivery hereof by Landlord and Tenant. O) Legal Fees. Tenant agrees to pay Landlord's reasonable legal fees for the review of this Agreement and in e,n amount not to exceed I upon reasonable proof of the same. 10 (j) Caplt~l Contribution. Tenant agrees to pay Lendlord a one time payment of '" ~pon Te~nts rcccit~ o£ ~1! Gove~mc~ ..~prov'~, Thc ~yvacal, wlll I~ tbnvm"d~l by l'~ml~ to l~,mdlord ~thin thirty'(30) day~ att~a' r~ceipt of~ ~eat Approvals. [SlGNATIJ~RES APPEAR ON THE NEXT PAGE] I1 [~ ~fl'l~,~ Wli~O~, t~ p~e~ ~ve c~u~t t~s Agreemeat to be eff~tiv~ ~ of t~ l~t d~e below. ~ WITi~3E$S~_.& "LANDLORD" Name: Print Name: Fast Marion Fire District A New York municipal corporation Its: Commissi01wf Date: ~ -"" Print Name:' , New ~ Wir~leas PCS, LLC a D~lawar~ ~it~l liability ~ [ACKNOV~LEDGM'F. NTS APPEAR ON 'I'HIc NEXT PAGE] 12 TENANT ACI(NOWLEDGM~iS~ this imtn~ne~ on behalf of the LANDLORD ACKNOWLEDGMENT INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMEI~T COUNTY OF I BE 1T REMBMBBRED, that on this day of ,200~ before me, ~hc subscriba', a pcrson authorized to takc oaths in thc State of , personally appeared who, bch~ duly sworn on his/hcr/thcir oath, dcposed and made proof to my satisfaction that hdshd[hcy idmc thc person(s) nemcd in thc within instrument; and I, having tint made known to Mm/hcc/thcm thc contents thc'cog hc/sheYthcy did ~tenowlcdgc that hc/shc/thcy signed, scaled and dclivcrcd tho same as his/her/thei? voluntary act and de. ed for tho purposes therein contained. Notary Public: My Commission Expires: 13 PAKTNE1LgHIP (e, ou~istina ofeorooratiom~ Afi~.NQWLEDGMENT STATE OF ) COb~,rrY OF ) I CERTIFY that on ,200__, p~sonally carae be, fore me and this/these pe~on(s) a~knowleclged under oath to my satisfaction, that: (a) this/these person(s) signed, seal~ and delivered the attached document as [title] of [name of co~oorafion] a ooq~oration of the State of ....... which is a g~eral partner of the partnership nam~ in tkis document; Co) the proper corporate seal of said corporal, g~r~l p~rmer was dfixed; ami (¢) -this document was signed and delivered by the corporation as its volunt~y sci ~ deed as Iai general parma(s) on bd~tt of said parmetship [by virtu~ of authority from i~s Boa~ o£Dir~or~]. Notary Public: My Commi~ion Expires: [name of [r~me of executed ~ inst. mmem as the a~t of the corp orat/on. /~f .._x~...._...~_- Notary Pubtic: My Commission Explr~: 14 EmIT 1 DI/:$cRrPTION OF PREMISES Page I of 4 to the Agreement dated ..... , 200_._, by and b~tw~n P. ast Marion Fire Distriot, a New York municipal coq~ration, as Landlord, and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as T~m~m. The Pr~mise. s are described a~d/or depicted as follows: ',. ,~.~~, ~ \ '~,~ ~,,~ \ ~. \ GRAPHIC SCALE ~'J ~ ~ ~ SITE LAYOUT ,GRAPHIC SCALE [,~.~ finigy ~/m/~,~ I.D. U-~01'7" ~ ~N R~D '~ ~ ~9N,, NY 11939 East Mar/on Fire Dbtrict Tower Spectfte~tlons and Accessories Page ! of 1 f~uanfitv 1 l De~¢riotion HeiSt Decibel 636, 8.6 R UI/~' for top mounting 460.00 MHZ top o£pole Low balad 46,46 MHZ, R. FSI 142 for side mount 40 feet CeJlwavc 210 UHF, 460.00 MHZ for side mount 40 fcet ATTACHMENT 4 OWNER'S CONSENT Attached hereto pursuant to Paragraph 16 of the Prime Lease. at&t Owner's Consent to Sublease Date: March 30, 2009 East Marion Fire District 9524 Main Road East Marion, NY t1939 Re: AT&T Mobility Lease/License with East Madon Fire District dated 8/17/2005 Site Name: NYC£NY1017 Site FA Number:. 10107550 Site Address: 9395 Main Road Site City, State, Zip Code East Marion, NY 11939 S ublessee/Sublioansee T-Mobile AT&T Mobility has received an application to allow another wireless carrier to co-locate within the leased premise and on our cell tower located at the address referenced above. This application shall be in accordance with local zoning laws and ~,gulatlons. Under our lease with you, AT&T has the right to sublease with your reasonable consent. While subletting the premises, AT&T Mobility will continue to be the lessee/licensee in our agreement with you and will perform all of our obligations under the lease/license. Additionally, the suhlessee/sublicensee shall have no more rights allowed to them in excess of our rights with you as outlined in our existing lease/license agreement. Agreed to and accepted this/,5~ay of ~_, 2009. ..... (signature) ./~3E',//~ ~/'. ~//A'A/.~'"'~.~ (printed Name) ~/~.5-//~ ~' (Date) ~, ,~ i z~ 77- ~/ ~ _3 (Phone) ~/f4/~D/~ 7-,q/cT-d_~ ~'P?-~ #,~',~ · ~'e(-~alt) III Please use the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope to return this consent. If you have any questions, please contact me at 770-708-6085 or bd51.20@att.com. Sincerely, Brittany Dohmen Applmation Process Manager AT&T Mobility. 12555 Cinguler Way, Cube , Alpharetta, GA 30004 ATTACHMENT S MEMORANDUM OF LICENSE This Memorandum of Site License Agreement is entered into on this __ day of ,200~ ("SLA Effective Date") by and between New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, with an office at 12555 Cingular Way, Suite 1300, Alpharetta, GA 30004 (hereinafter referredto as"LICENSOR") and T- Mobile Northeast LLC wi~h ~B 0f~ee at 12920 SE 38th Street, Bellevue, WA 98006 ~¢r¢inaf~er referred to as "LICENSEE"). LICENSOR and LICENSEE entered into a Site License Agreement C'SLA") on the __ day of ,200~ for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining a radio communications facility and other improvements. All of the foregoing are set forth in the Site License Agreement. The term of the SLA is for five (5) years commencing on ,200 and ending on , with four (4) successive five (5) year options to renew. If all options to renew are exercised, the term of this SLA will expire twenty-five (25) years after the SLA Effective Date (as defined in the SLA). 3. The Land is described in Attachraent I m~xed hereto. The original copy of this SLA is held at the LICENSOR's and LICENSEE's addresses set forth above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Site License Agreement as of the day and year first above written. LICENSOR: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BY: AT&T Mobility Corporation ITS: Manager LICENSEE: T-Mobile Northeast LLC By: EXHIBIT ONL Y-DO NOT SIGN By: EXHIBIT ONL Y-DO NOT SIGN (Signature) (Signature) (Print) (Print) Title: Title: Date: Date: STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instmmant. Dated: Notary Public Print Name My commission expires (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DaSd: Notary Public Print Name My commission expires (Use this space for notary stamp/seal) MEMOI~AND~ OF I~CENSE A~I~AC'~IMENT LEGAL !~JFrlON · ~ be atteched t6 executable MOL. L~I~P CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT~ A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for lxxmits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are su~ect to the Town ofSoulhold Wateafmm ~ Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town Of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt aca'ons including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, Before answering the c~ons in Section C, the ~ of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Watexfront ~li~tion lc~ A proposed action will be evuluated as to its significant beneficial and adveme effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or no" then the proposed action will affect the achievement ofthe LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail listing both supporting and non- conditions, it shall not be undertaken. / SCTM# 31 A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown~nortlffork. net), the Board of Trustees Office, the PlanningDepartxnent, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. ,PR 28 2010 DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION ,, -3 . 11.31 PROJF2CT ~ Proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility at the East Marion Fire Depamnent (LI 13-345A) The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoan~ ~ Planning Board [-~ Building Dept. ~ Board of Trustees Category of Town of Southold agency action (check app, opriate res~nse): (a) Action anderlaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) Co) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loa~ subsidy) (c) Peinfit, alJpioval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: The proposed action involves the collocation of a T-Mobile public utility wireless communications thcility within and proximate to an existing flagpole monopole on the East Marion Fire Department prope~3,. Specifically, T-Mobile intends to install three antennas within the existing 110±-foot above grade level ("ag]") flagpole monopole (owned by AT&T Mobifity). The antennas would be mounted within the flagpole monopole at a centerline height of 87±-feet agl, and would be concealed from view. T-Mobile would also install associated ground-based equipment adjacent to the existing AT&T equipment area, The proposed equipment cabinets would be placed upon an 8-foot-by-22-foot concrete pad within an overall 12-foot-by-23-foot-3-inch fenced equipment area The proposed equipment would connect to the antennas via cables and an ice bridge Finally, T-Mobfle would plant landscape vegetation on the west, north and east sides of the proposed equipment compound area Location of action: East Mn~Fire Department, 9245 Main Road, Hamlet o Site acreage: 3.0± acres Present land use: Fire Department, Police Department and communications facility Present zoning classification: Residential Low Density AA (R-40) and Hamlet Business (HB) If an application for the ~ action has been filed with tho Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant T-Mobile Northeast LLC (19) IVl~rlg nclclrlw, S: 3500 Sunrise Highway, Suite D-203, Great River, New York 11739 (c) Telephone numbet:. Area Code () 631-224-6651 (d) Application number, if any:. Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [--] No[5~ lfyes, which state or fedeml agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes ~] No [-~ Not Applicable As indicated in the project description, the proposed action involves the collocation of a T-Mobile public utility wireless communications facility within and adjacent to an existing flagpole monopole upon the East Marion Fire District property. As such, the proposed collocation is making use of an existing structure for the placement of the proposed facility, obviating the need to construct another tall structure (i.e., a monopole), to accommodate such a facility. Therefore, adverse effects associated with development are minimized. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable The proposed action does not involve hi! or archaeologic resources, nor is the overalll , such resources. M~reover, the proposed collocation would be within and proximate to an existing flagpole monopole upon previously disturbed property. Attach additional sheets if necessm'y Policy 3. Enhance visual qualiW and protect scenic resom-ca~ throughout the Tov, rn of Southold. See LWRP Section llI- Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~ NO ~ Not Applicable As indicated in the project description, the proposed action involves the concealment ofT-Mobile antennas within an existing flagpole monopole and the placement of ground-based equipment (to be surrounded by landscape vegetation) proximate thereto. As such, this facility specifically complies with LWRP policy standards 3. I.C (Screen components of development which detract visual quality) and 3.1 .D (use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components). Almch additional shee~ if necessary NATURAL OOAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minirrfize loss of life, m and nattnal reso~ fiom flooding and erosion. See LYVRP Section llI- Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes [--1 NO [5~ Not Applicable The existing flagpole monopole and the proposed T-Mobile collocation would be situated upon the landlocked East Marion Fire Department property, as the nearest surface waters are more than 0.25-mile from the proposed facility. Moreover, there are no erosion or flood hazards associated with the proposed action. Therefore, this policy is not applicable. Attach additional shee~ ifn~ssa~y Policy 5. Prote~ and improve water quality and supply in lhe Tcycvn of Southold. See LYVRP Section 11I - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes[~ll I No ~5~ Not Applicable The proposed facility would be unmanned and would not require potable water, nor would it generate sewage or wastewater. Additionally, there are no wetlands on or contiguous to the proposed project location, thus there would be no potential impacts to surface waters or groundwater. Therefore, this policy is not applicable to the proposed action. Attach additional sheets if necessary Pohcy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and YV'fldlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section 1II - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~'~ No ~ Not Applicable Yh~ proposed action involves the colloa~n of a public utility wireless communications ,i~ility upon a fire department property within and proximate to an existing flagpole m~l~pole. As no significant ecological resources a~ound on the overall subject property, this policy is not applicable. Attach additional sheem if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold See LVv'RP Section m - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [--] Yes [-'-] Nb ~ Not Applicable There are no emissions associated with the operation of the proposed public utility wireless communications facility that would impact air quality. As such, this policy is not applicable. Attach additional sheets if~ Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LVqRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. The proposed action would not result in the generation of solid waste, as it would be an unoccupied facility. Additionally, the proposed action does not involve the use or generation of hazardous waste. As such, the proposed action is not applicable. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of; coastal walers, public lands, and public resom-ce~ oflheTownofSouthold SeeLWRP Sectionm- Policies; Pages 38 flmough46 forc:wakmfion The proposed public utility wireless facility will be collocated within and proximate to an existing flagpole monopole upon the East Marion Fire Department property. As such, it would not have an impact upon public access to and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources. As such, and this policy is not applicable. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES suitable locations. See LVqRP~ection ffI - Policies- Pages 47 throu~l'56 for evmuatton criteria. As previously indicated, the proposed action involves the collocation of a public utility wireless communications facility on the East Marion Fire Department property. As such, it does not involve water-dependent uses, and this policy is not applicable. Attach ~d,tifional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use oflix4ng marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic EstuaW and Town waters. See LVqRP Section l]l- Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes [---] No [~ Not Applicable The proposed action involves the collocation of a public utility wh'eless communications facility, and does not involve living marine resources. Therefore, this policy is not applicable. Attach additional sheOs if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Tom of Southold See LX,VRP Section m - policies; Pages 62 through 65 for 6waluafion criteri~ As previously indicated, the proposed facility would be situated upon a previously-disturbed portion of the Fire Department property and does not involve agricultural land. Therefore, this policy is not applicable. Attach ~,'Uitional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote approiMate use and developrnea~t ofene,gy and mineral resources. See LWRP Sexztion m - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. The proposed action involves the collocation of a public utility wireless communications facility, and does not involve the development of energy and mineral resources. Therefore, this policy is not applicable. Erin E~he--varria~'~H~ Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P,C as environmental consultant for T-Mobile Amended on 8/1/05 TITLE Project Manager DATE April 2, 2010 P:28114:doc:various:LWRPConsisteney Assessment Form 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proJect or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subJective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance, The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiallyJarge impact, The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important, THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ Part1 ~ Part2 F'"~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITION£D negative declaration will be prepared.* r~c. The project may result in one or more large important impacts may and that have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Proposed T-Mobile Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility at the East Marion Fire Depamnent (LI 13-345A) Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by ProJect sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Proposed T-Mobile Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility at the East Marion Fire Department (LI 13 -345A) Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) East Marion Fire Department, 9245 Main Road, Hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, Suffolk County Name of ApplicantJSponsor T-Mobile Northeast LLC Address 3500 Sunrise Highway, Suite D-203 City / POGreat River Business Telephone (631) 224-6651 StateNew York Zip Code 11739 Name of Owner (if different) East Marion Fire District Address 9245 Main Road City/PO East Marion Business Telephone 631-477-0163 State NewYork ZipCode 11939 Description of Action: The proposed action involves the collocation of a T-Mobile public utility wireless communications facility within and proximate to an existing flagpole monopole on the East Marion Fire Department property. Specifically, T-Mobile intends to install three antennas within the existing 110~--foot above grade level ("agl") flagpole monopole (owned by AT&T Mobility). The antennas would be mounted within the flagpole monopole at a centerline height of 87±-feet agl, and would be concealed from view. T-Mobile would also install associated ground-based equipment adjacent to the existing AT&T equipment area. The proposed equipment cabinets would be placed upon an 8-foot-by-22-foot concrete pad within an overall 12-foot-by-23-foot-3-inch fenced equipment area. The proposed equipment would connect to the antennas via cables and an ice bridge. Finally, T-Mobile would plant landscape vegetation on the west, north and east sides of the proposed equipment compound area. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N,A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial D Forest ~ Residential (suburban) [] Agriculture [~Other Fire Department D Rural (non-farm) 0.006± 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Ama Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) lawn AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0.002± acres 0 acres 0.004± acres 0.006± 0 acres acres acres.(Representsproposed T-Mobileequipmentareaonly) PRESENTLY Haven Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ("HaA") and Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? percent slopes ("RdA") a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained 100 % of site [] Moderately well drained % of site, ~ Poorly drained % of site If any agricultural land i~,~i~volved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? ~n~ acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). [] No Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes a. What is depth to bedrock 500± (in feet) Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r~0.10% 100 % ~10.15% % [] 15% or greater % Is project substantia~l~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes ~ No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~ Yes [~No What is the depth of the water table? <3 (in feet) amsl Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? []Yes ~ No DYes .~. No 8. 9. 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Page 3 of 21 ' 11, Do~s project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes [] No Accordin~l to: Identi~ each species: · ' ; : ' ; 'ii'~'': other geological formations? 12 Are there an5' unique or unusual land forms on the project ste3 0 e, chffs, dunes r-lyes EINo visit. Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighbothood as an open space or recreation area? DYes r~No If ;/es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the communitsr? DYes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: None b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17, Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes N No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? r~Yes b, If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DNo ~Yes ~No (On-site connections) 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes []No 19, Is the site located in or substantiallxcontiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes []No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description 1, Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a, Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 0.006± b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.006± acres initially; 0,006± c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles:N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0* ; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: t permonth h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A DYes r~No (Represents proposed T-Mobile acres, equipment area only) acres ultimately. % __ (Unoccupied facility) (upon completion of project)? (To inspect equipment) One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ** 7.l± height; 2.1± j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes ~No []N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation7 DYes [] No c. Wilt upper subsoil be ~tockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No width; 4.4± ft. tons/cubic yards. length. 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ,0.004± acres. *There are no parking spaces in the immediate project area. However, there is paved parking on the overall Fire Department property. **Represents the dimensions of the largest proposed equipment cabinet. Page 5 of 21 '5. 7. If multi-phased: Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? r~Yes ~No I¢ single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 3± months, (including demolition) a. Total number of phases anticipated ~ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: ~ month ~ year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase', ~ month __ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~ Yes ~ No Will blasting occur during construction? N Yes [] No Number of jobs generated: during construction 3± ; after project is complete _0 ~No 9. 10, Number ofjobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~Yes If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes ~ No (Unoccupied facilitT) a, If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13, ~s subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No Type (Unoccupied facilitT) 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project Iocatod in a 100 year flood plain? ~Yes ~]No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No (Unoccupied hcili~) a, If yes, what is the amount per month? __ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? r~ Yes ~'~ No c. If yes, give n. ame ; location d, Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [] Yes [] No Page 6 of 21 ' e, If yes, explain: 17. Willthe project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ~ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes ~ No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [] Yes [~ No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) Minimal increase in electricity usage to operate a public utility wireless communications facility. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 0 gallons/day, (Unoccupied facility) 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes ~ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Ap*provals Required: City, Town, Village Board DYes ~ No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes ~ No Site Plilrl Special Exception City, Town Zoning Board DYes r~ No City, County Health Department N Yes [] No Other Local Agencies Yes ~ No Other Regional Agencies DYes ~ No State Agencies [] Yes [] No Federal Agencies N Yes r~ No c. zoning and Planning Information 1, Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? If Yes, indicate decision required: ~ Zoning amendment ~--'~Site plan N No ~ Zoning variance [~] Special use permit D New/revision of master plan D Resource management plan ~ Subdivision ~ Other Page 8 of 21 · 2. W[~at is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Residential Low Density AA (R-40) and Hamlet Business (HB). 3, What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? IN/A, the subject property is already developed with a Fire Station, a War Memorial Association building, paved parking and a public utility wireless communications facility. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? I No change of zone is proposed. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6, Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted Ir)cai land use plans? [] Yes [] No I 7. What ara the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action* Predominant zoning classifications include Residential Low Density AA (R-40), Hamlet Business (HB) and Residential Low Density A (R-80). Predominant land uses include fire department, residential, commercial and agricultural. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Va mile? If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a, What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A Page 9 of 21 · '10, W~II proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation or sewer or water districts? Yes No 11, Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? N Yes ~ No (Unoccupied facility) a, If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a, If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic, DYes m D. Informational Details No Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project, If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification i certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. VI-IB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C. as April 2, 2010 (Revised) Applicant/Sponsor Name environmental consultant for T-Mobile Date March 19, 2010 Sign at ure '~.~ ~ - Efin"Ecl~evarria Title Project Manager If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 28114.00\docs\Various\EAFXFinal\NYSEAF Revised 4-10 Page 10 of 21 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: July 14, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached check into a deferred account. It represents Consultant fee for a wireless application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Type ~ 31-3-11.31 Wireless consultant fee Amount $8,500 Check bate/No. Authorization Code 6/14/10 - 1790841 LR Att, PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD J MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: April 28, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached checks into a deferred account. They represent Wireless Site Plan Application and Special Exception fees for an application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check bate/No. Type # Authorization Code T-Mobile @ E.MarJon FD SP 31-3-11.31 $1,000 11/24/09 - #1640471 T-Mobile ~ E. Marion Spec. Except. 31-3-11.31 $1,000 11/24/09 -#1640472 LR Atts. ~ILASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Project Type: Site Plans Status: No Site Plan Require.d//~,¢:~d~-7 SCTM #: 1000 - 31.-3-11.31 Project Name: East Marion FDfT-Mobile NE, Address: 9425 NYS Pt. 25, East Marion Hamlet: East Marion Applicant Name: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC Owner Name: East Marion Fire District Zone 1' R-40 Approval Date: LLC OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION End SP Date: Zone 2: Location: SC Filing Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 3: SCAN Date: SCANNED APR 2 8 2011 Records Management BOUNPAP-.'r' LINE ALTERATION ALLEN OVSIANIK CUTCHO®UE TOIAIN OF SOUTHOLID SUFFOLK COUN-FT', NEIAI YORK NAPPED JULY Iq, 2010 SUFFOLK. C, OUNT~' TAX HAP NUMBER IOOO - qq - 2 - 16.5 IOOO - qT- 2 - 15 FIRE DISTRICT No. 2q SCHOOL OlSTRIC, T No q APPLICANT, OP4NER, ALLEN P4. OVSIANIK 84qO SOUNDVIEI'~ AVE, 5OUTHOLD~ N.Y. IIq%l APR 28 2011 i EL=14,4 134 104 HIGHEST 29 EXPECTED OW HOLE McDonald Geoscience 3 15-2010 O0 DARK BROWN LOAM OL BROWN CLAYEY SAND SC BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND - BP FINE TO MEDIUM BAND - SP BUILDING FLOOR EL=iS,5 ~ HOUSE TRAP WITH C/D BUILDING SANITARY TYPICAL PLOT PLAN 4~ DTA 35 PVC TYPICAL LOCK[NC C,L COVER TOP EL=150 SEPTIC TANK 1200 GAL LOCKINO CI COVER TOP EL=lSD 8"PRECAST TRAFFIC BEARING SLAB LOCKING 0,1, COVER TOP EL =140 PRECAST CONCRETE CHIMNEY GRADE EL=14,0 SANITARY SYSTEM EL=7B N 8"PRECAST TRAFFIC BEARING SLAB NOTES: EXISTIN® SEPTIC TO BE RENIOVEE) AS PER S.C.O.H.S. STANDARDS TOTAl AREA = q'q,58],DD2 S.F. OR 1.82]'1 ACRES PROPOSEE) LOT I = 4q,S44.1D] S,F. OP--. 1.1~,-'/4 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 2 = DO,O4D.Iq5 S.F. OR 0.~8q7 ACRES PROPOSED BEARIN®S ANO DISTANCES SHO!dN IN RED ®RAPHI© 50ALE II'= 0 40 8;0 120 SEPTIC DESI®N JOBR ~, E? t~,¥,P.LS, LI6 * .~2202 6 EAST MAIN STREET N,Y.S. LIC. NO. 50202 R1VERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF-CADocuments and Settings\OwnerWly DocumentsWIy Dropbox\05\05\05-299 BOOTY AS PRINTEE APPROVAL R EVI EW EOBERTS. MAYO CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER - MAXTON TECHNOLOGY NAMIT SHABMA RF MANAGER - T-MOBILE NORTHEAST SENIOR RF ENGINEER MAVEN AI,ADWAN RF PERFORMANCE - T-MOBILE NORTHEAST MANAGER ENGINEERING, RF RHOAN GORDON RF ENGINEER - T-MOBILE NORTHEAST RF ENGINEER JOHN J. COUfiHIJN - R~, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP ATTORNEY TODD PADREZA ZONING SPECIALIST - MAXTON TECHNOLOBY TODD PADREZA SITE ACQUISITION MANAGER - MAXTON TECHNOLOOY ?AUL LaPASOTA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST CONSTRUCTION MANAGER EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT - Robert Hicks LANDLORD/OWNER - CONTACT AT&T MOBILITY - Raymond Crews TOWER OWNER - CONTACT FORM T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY, SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SITE TYPE: COLOCATION ON EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE HEAD NORTH ON HIGHWAY (R?UTE DIRECTIONS CONNETQUOT AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 0,2 MILE TO THE 27) EAST, TAKE SUNRISE TAKE EXIT 61 TURN RIGH1 MILES, ENTER THE 1,2 MILES. 6. TURN LEFT 7. TURN RIOH1 8 TURN RICH- 9. STAY STRAIt 10. CR-~-8 BBCOMES MARION ON-RAMP HIGHWAY (ROUTE 27) EAST APPROXIMATELY 22.6 MILES, FOR CR-51N TOWARD RIVERHEAD, AND FOLLOW FOR 6,5 MILES. ONTO CR-63N, LAKE AVENUE/EAST MORLCHES RIVERHEAB ROAD, AND ROUNDABOUT AND TAKE SECOND EXIT ONTO NY-24E, FLANDERS ROAD, NY-25, MAIN ROAD. FOLLOW FOR 1.7 FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL BE ON YOUR LEFT. NOTE: COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IS NOT PERMITTED ONTO CR-IOSN, CROSS RIVER DRIVE, AND FOLLOW FOR 3.8 MILES. ONTO CR-~'5, NORTHVILLE TURNPIKE, AND FOLLOW FOR 0.5 MILE. ONTO SOUND AVENUE, AND FOLLOW FOR 5.4 MILES. ;HT TO GO ONTO CR-48E, MIDDLE ROAD, AND FOLLOW FOR 15.4 MILES. END AT MILES. FOR SUNRISE FOLLOW FOR 1.7 AND FOLLOW FOR 9245 MAIN ROAD, THE EAST ON PARKWAYS. VERIFY ALL ROUTES. SHEET INDEX SHT. DESOR~PTION NO. T-1 TITLE SHEET ON-1 NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS SETBACK PLAN PLAN & EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN COMPOUND LANDSCAPE PLAN ELEVATION Z-4. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Z-5 EQUIPMENT & CONSTRUCTION DETAILS PROJECT SITE NUMBER: SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS; MUNICIPALITY: COUNTY: ASSESSORS iNFO: ZONING: LATITUDE: ONGiTUDE: CONSTRUCTION WPE: PROPERTY CON;ACT: PROPERTY OWI~ER: TOWER OWNER, SUMMARY LI 15-545A EAST MARION FIRE 924..5MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT 11959 SECTION 51, BLOCK 5, LOT 11.51 R-4.0 (RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA) (PROJECT LIES WITHIN R-40 ZONE) HB (HAMLET BUSINESS) 4.1' 07' 42.24-" N 72' 20' 27.96" W EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE (COLOCATION) ROBERT HICKS 651 4.77-0539 (EMFD) EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT PO BOX 162 (924.5 MAIN ROAD) EAST MARION, NY 11959 AT&T MOBILITY PO BOX 97079 REDMOND, WA 98075-9779 TOWER CONTACT: APPLICANT: RAYMOND CREWS NE REGIONAL ACCOUNT 201 -208-5158 T MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 5500 SUNRISE HWY., STE. GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 651-224-6651 MANAGER D-203 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE T-MOBILE REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING OF DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY,, SU£1'15 D-203 Gl(EAT RIVER, NY 11739 II~XTON MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, lNG, BAY STATE I~F_,SI~-I~ BAY STATE DESIGN, INC, Architects · Engineers 241 Boston Post Rd, West Phone: 508-229-4100 Marlborough, MA. 01752 Fox' 508-485-5321 ENGINEER I PROJECT NO: I DRAWN BY: I CHECKED BY: 2902.034 I scI K.W./K.B. I S U B M ITTALS 04-09-10 ZONING FINAL 05-50-10 ZONING THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPERI~ AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITFEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE LI 15 34-5A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 119.39 SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER 1 GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS 1. RADIUS PLAN DEVELOPED BY USING MAPS AND DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND BY THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK. ADJ ADJUSTABLE MLO MAIN LUGS ONLY 2, CONTRACTOR TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND THAT WHICH IS REPRESENTED AFFABOVE F,N,SHEO fLOOR M,N M,N,MDM Northeast LLC HERE. AFO ABOVE FINISHED GRADER MTL METAL 3. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN THUS :1: ARE APPROXIMATE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WHICH AFFECT THE APPROX APPROXIMATE N NEUTRAL 3500 S~SET-]~C/Y., STJT]']~D-205 GREAT RIVER, ]qY 11739 CONTRACTOR'S WORK. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS WITH OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE NEC NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 4 A SURVEY PLAN IS SHOWN ON SHEET C 1 THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED, SIGNED, AND STAMPED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. CALLED "SURVEY OE A-1 ANTENNA MARK NO. NIC NOT IN CONTRACT PROPERq~' AT EAST MARION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y." WITH ONE SHEET SHOWING THE ENTIRE PROPERTY AT SCALE: 1"=30' THE pLAN SET IS DATED MARCH 26, 2010. ETS RASE TRANSMISSION STATION NTB NOT TO SCALE NORTH ARROW BHOWN OR PLANS REFERB TO TRUE NORTH. CONTRACTOR SNALL VERIFY TRUE NORTH AND INFORM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OE ANY C DONDUIT GO C.C. ON CENTER MAXTON TECHNOLOGY. INC, 6. ALL SITE WORK TO CONFORM TO THE LATEST TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT (P) PROPOSED BAY STAT , CONC CONCRETE PCS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS 7. 'DEWATER' ALL TRENCHES AS REQUIRED DURING INSTALLATION OF ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS TO ENSURE PROPER DEPTH AND STRUCTURAL SERVICES ]-~,:~--.,SIGN INTEGRITY OF CONCRETE. CONT CONTINUOUS CJ CONSTRUCTION JOINT PL PROPERTY LINE 8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH APPROVED WORKING DRAWINGS AND REQUIREMENT SHEETS. NO DEVIATION WILL BE PERMI~ED EXCEPT BY WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. COMPACTION UNDER STRUCTURES, BUILDING SLABS, STEPS, PAVEMENTS, AND WALKWAYS SHALL BE 95%. D DEPTH PNL PANEL 9. MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, ASTM D-1557, COMPACTION UNDER LAWNS OR IN UNPAVED AREAS: 85% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, ASTM D-1557. DIA DIAMETER PP POWER PANEL BAY STATE DESIGN, INC, 10. ALL ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICES SMALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND, DN DOWN PPC POWER PROTECTION CABINET Architects · Engineers DWG DRAWING PT PRESSURE-TREATED 2¢1 Boston Post Rd. West Phone 508-229-4-100 Marlborough, MA. 01752 Fax: 508-485 532 11. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO TONE PATH OF EXISTING CABLE AND PROVIDE MARK-OUTS. HAND-EXCAVATE NEAR ANY UNDERGROUND PIPES, UTILITIES, OR PVC POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE STRUCTURES. EOB EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND "DIG-SAFE" OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AND LEGALLY AND COMMERCIALLY ACCEPTABLE UTILITY (E) EXISTING RA RIGID ALUMINUM LOCATOR SERVICE, IN ORDER TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN AREAS OF WORK. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MEANS OF EA EACH REINF. REINFORCED PROTECTION OF SAID EXIST[NO UTILITIES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK. COORDINATE ALL REQUIRED RELOCATION WORK WITH THE AFFECTED RCS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL UTILITY PROVIDER. ELEC ELECTRICAL EL ELEVATION SCH SCHEDULE 15. ALL WASTE MATERIAL, INCLUDING RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, ETC., SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR, AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING SF SO.FT. SQUARE FOOT 14. CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE THE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING EQ EQUAL SHT SHEET CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. EQUIP EQUIPMENT SIM SIMILAR 15 ALL CONCRETE USED FOR ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AIR-ENTRAINED, AND SHALL ACHIEVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4,000 PSI AT EXT EXTERIOR SS STAINLESS STEEL 2B DAYS. FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION STD STANDARD ~ · 16. IF EXISTING GRAVEL BEDDING IS REMOVED, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAB AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK. RESTORE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC FG FINISHED GRADE STL STEEL AB WELL. PR OVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AS REQUIRED. GA GAUGE TOO TOP OF CONCRETE ~~~,,.~/ 17, THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE EOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED FOR GALV GALVANIZED TOM TOP OF MASONRY THE WORK BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER, THE STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY. SC GENERAL CONTRACTOR TYP TYPICAL 18. ANTENNA INSTALLATION SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY FIELD CREWS EXPERIENCED IN THE ASSEMBLY AND ERECTION OF RADIO ANTENNAS, TRANSMISSION LINES AND SUPPORT STRUCTURES. 6WB DYPBUM WALLBOARD UON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED H BT HEIGHT UL UNDERWRITERS LABORATORY 19, ANTENNAS, SUPPORTS AND CABLE MOUNTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING SURFACES TO WHICH THEY ARE ATTACHED. PAINT SHALL BE SHERWlN WILLIAMS, COROTHANE II. SURFACE PREPARATION AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT OWNER JT JOINT VIF VERIFY IN FIELD GUIDELINES. LG LONG W WIDTH 20. COORDINATION, LAYOUT, AND FURNISHING OF CONDUIT, CABLE AND ALL APPURTENANCES REQUIRED FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION LNA LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER WP WEATHER-PROOF ENGINEER AiND ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. MAX MAXIMUM W WT WEIGHT 21. EQUIPMENT WILL BE INDEPENDENTLY POWERED WITH SEPARATE METER. IMCB MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC PROJECT NO: 2902.054 22. ALLL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, W/ WITH AiND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE IMDP MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL U~ED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTORS SHALL PROVIDE SAFEFY TRAINING FOR & AND DRAWN BY: SC THEIR WORKING CREW. MECH MECHANICAL @ AT 2,3. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED MFR MANUFACTURER ¢ DIAMETER I CHECKED BY: K.W./K.B. AND/OR CAPPED, PLUGGED, OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WiLL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OEUT,L,TYCOMPANYENC,NEER,NO. SYMBOLS AND MATERIALS 24. THE AREAS OF THE PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE EQUIPMENT, DRIVEWAY OR GRAVEL, SHALL BE GRADED TO A SUBMITTALS UNIFORM SLOPE, FERTILIZED, SEEDED, AND COVERED WITH MULCH, [~ NEW ANTENNA o ~) WORK iTEM NOTE 25. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. ~:~ EXISTING ANTENNAS o ~ MATCH LINE 26, ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ~%.~ ASPHALT ~ WORK POINT 27. ALL SETBACKS SHOWN FROM PROPOSED ANTENNAS TO PROPERTY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHOULD BE USED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. [] NEW ACCESS EASEMENT 28. TME TYPE, DIMENSIONS, MOUNTING HARDWARE, AND POSITIONS OF ALL PROJECT OWNER'S EQUIPMENT ARE SHOWN IN ILLUSTRATIVE FASHION. THESE ~ INSULATED GROUND BAR ,~' ,~,~ 9 'o '~'~U BIRAWlNGS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ACTUAL HARDWARE DETAILS AND FINAL LOCATIONS MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM WHAT IS SHOWN. [] CONCRETE ~ INSULATED GROUND BAR 29. THE PROJECT OWNER'S PCS FACILITY iS AN UNMANNED PRIVATE AND SECURED EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION. IT IS ONLY ACCESSED BY TRAINED TECHNICIANS [~ ELECTRIC BOX ~ UNINSULATED GROUND BAR , ,, FOR PERIODIC ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AND THEREFORE DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY WATER OR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. THE FACILITY IS NOT GOVERNED BY REGULATIONS REQUIRING PUBLIC ACCESS PER ADA REQUIREMENTS. 7~ LIGHT POLE REV 04-09-10 ZONING FINAL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION 50. THE PROJECT OWNER'S BASE TRANSMISSION STATION (ETS) CABINET IS A VANDAL RESISTANT STEEL CABINET CONTAINING RECTIFIERS, AMPLIFIERS, RADIOS, ~.~% REV 0 03-50-10 ZONIND AND OTHER INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC CONTROL EQUIPMENT. BA%ERY BACKUP FOR EMERGENCY STANDBY POWER IS CONTAINED WITHIN A SEPARATE', N~ UTILITY POLES I,,} '::" ",. I GROUT OR pLASTER BA%ERY RACK CONTAINING 12-VOLT, CLOSED-CELL DC BATTERIES. THE BATTERIES ARE LEAD-ACID RECHARGEABLE STANDBY INDUSTRIAL POWER CELLS H~, I,I1'111 ~1 I GYPSUM WALL BOARD MANUFACTURED TO MEET ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND RUGGEDNESS STANDARDS OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION (IATA). THE 0 FND. MONUMENT THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, BATTERY-CHARGING SYSTEM IS COMPUTER-CONTROLLED AND THE EQUIPMENT CABINET IS REMOTELY MONITORED FOR FAULTS AND ALARMS AT PROJECT I= I PLYWOOD PROPER]~ AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF OWNER'S NETWORK OPERATIONS CONTROL CENTER 2~- HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK ~ SPOT ELEVATION T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY 51. THE DESIGN OF THE ANTENNA MOUNTING HARDWARE AND STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT OF EXISTING BUILDING ROOF/FLOOR (IF NECESSARY) TO SUPPORT ~ SET POINT K' / // -': ,I STEEL DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS THE ETS EQUIPMENT CABINETS WILL MEET THE ANSI/EIA/TIA-222 F STANDARDS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES AND STATE,~ J ~ ,' .... ' I CONCRETE WRITTENDuPLiCATioNCONSENTANBISusESTRICTLYBy GOVERNMENTPROHIBITEB' BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS DETAILED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WILL BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ~['~ GROUND TEST WELL AGENCIES FOR EARTH THE PURPOSES OF pROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE~ CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL. (~ GROUND ROD t" ......,,., ..,.u,..-.. I GRAVEL REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF 32. ONCE THE FACILITY BECOMES FULLY OPERATIONAL, NORMAL AND ROUTINE MAINTENANCE BY PROJECT OWNER'S TECHNICIANS WILL BE PERFORMED ON A MONTHLY BASIS. THEREFORE, THE ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE IS 2 TRIPS PER MONTH. THE AVERAGE DAILY TRIP GENERATION RATE (ADT) ELECTRICAL WIRING I ] SAND THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X56", IT IS NOT IS 0.07. CD~ (TURNING UP) TO SCALE. I''~' I WOOD CONTINUOUS BB. pER FCC MANDATE, ENHANCED EMERGENCY (E911) SERVICE IS REQUIRED TO MEET NATIONWIDE STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. ELECTRICAL WIRING pROJECT OWNER'S IMPLEMENTATION REQUIRES DEPLOYMENT OF EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THiS PLAN, ATTACHED TO OR ~ (TURNING DOWN) I I WOOD BLOCKING SITE MOUNTED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE ETS RADIO CABINETS. PROJECT OWNER RESERVES THE RIOHT TO MAKE REASONABLE MODIFICATIONS TO E911 EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS TECHNOLOGY EVOLVES TO MEET REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS. [~ DISCONNECP SWITCH CENTER LINE BI B4. pERMANENT STANDBY EMERGENCY POWER WILL NOT RE UTILIZED BY PROJECT OWNER. IF NECESSARY, DURING AN EXTENDED POWER OUTAGE, A PORTABLE (~D EAST MARION FIRE EMERGENCY GENERATOR WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY EMERGENCY BACKUP POWER. THERE IS NO ON-SITE BULK STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE OR RECEPTACLE PROPERS( LINE COMBUSTIBLE FUELS FOR OPERATING AN EMERGENCY GENERATOR FOR THE PROJECT OWNER'S EQUIPMENT, c~ ~ STEPPED FOOTING DEPARTMENT ~ 9245 MAIN ROAD 55. THE TOTAL IMPACT AREA OF THE DISTURBED CONSTRUCTION SITE IS BOUNDED BY THE "LIMIT OF WORK" AS SHOWN HEREON. THE MAXIMUM AREA OF REVISION --'OW' GROUND WIRE EAST MARION, NY 11959 DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK IS APPROXIMATELY [1,,383~ SQUARE FEET. THE PROJECT IMPACT AREA IS BELOW THE EXEMPTION THRESHOLD OF 45,560 SQUARE FEET IN 40 CFR PARTS 9, 122 124, AND THEREFORE IS NOT SUBJECT TO REGULATION UNDER THE EPA OR STATE-MANAGED NPDES ~ GRID REFERENCE COAXIAL CABLE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PROGRAM. THE PROJECT OWNER'S GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT ALL SITE DEVELOPMENT WORK IN A MANNER~ x x CHAIN LINK FENCE THAT DOES NOT EXCEED THE LIMITS OF WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROJECT OWNER'S GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT ALL ~ SHEET TITLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT RESULT IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES WITH AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON ANY STORM WATER~ -u ~ STOCKADE FENCE COLLECTION OR CONVEYANCE SYSTEM, WETLAND, WATER BODY, OR OTHER WATER RESOURCE AREAS, DETAIL ~EEEBENCE NOTES, ~ ~- FENCE ABBREVIATIONS & GUARD RAIL GYM BOLS # ELEVATION W D<}-- WATER MAIN -- O/H OVERHEAD WIRES SHEET NUMBER ---OHW- __P DNDERGROUND POWER SECTIONS - ---E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC & DETAILS .... T UNDERGROUND TELCO ,, T-Mobile Northeast LLC XTON N N N N -- BAyMAXTON TECHNOLOGY,STATEINC, i ~ BAY STATE DESIGN, INC. Architects · Engineers ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 241 Boston Post Ed, West Phone: 508-229-4100 Merlborough, MA. 01752 Fox: 508-485-5521 /// / / ~ THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CR~TION, DESIGN, ~ ~ ~ ~, T ~O~LE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY .(.. DUPLICATION O~ USE WITNOUT EXPRESS ~RI~EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. , DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT ~ ~ CONDUCTINO THEI~ ~WFULLY AUTHORIZEO REOU~70~Y AND AD~[N[STR~IVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF , . LEGEND DEPARTMENT / R.O,W. SIDELINE SHE~ TITLE SETBACK sc~: ~": 40'~ SC~L~: ~" = 40' ~ ~ , · Northeast LLC '~~ ~. /-APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NORTH ~ ] , ~ ~ ] ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~/~ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ·~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~.~ . ~ ~EXLSTING GRASS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FIELD % ~ ' - ' ~ . PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTH~ST~~ ~ 23'-3'xl 2'-0" L~SE i / ~ / ~EXISTIN¢ ~ ] . ~ Archltect~ · Engtneer~ EXISTING F~G~ /..]] '....]~ Morlborough, MA. 01752 Fax: 508-485-5321 ~ / ~, ~ ]. ', ] ~. ~ OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT NO~TH~ST CONCR~E~ B ~ ~- ' /SEE COUPOUN~ ~NBSCAPE~ ~ ~ ~ONE R-'40 ' ~EQUIPMENT P~ ~EQUiPMENTCHAIN LINK F~NOE~'r --> ,~ ' I' --/PROPOSED ~ ' ' ~ ' '' '' ' ~ L pROPOSED GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED~ II I I * / I /"~ER IN EXI~INO SPARE StaT BELOW , , I ~ ~e l/ AT~T ,~ER ON EXISTING N;F~E i I ~,~ ~ Il I , , /TRA~FORMER R~ 1 34-09-10 ZONINg FINAL ~ ~ " PROPOSED 7/8"¢ COAX~ / ~--~--*~"~ ~"~- ~: ~°~x x ~E I ~ PROPER~ AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF ~ CABLES (~P. OF 4 PER I c ~ -"'~' ~~ } ~ J T-MOBILE NORTH~ST LLC, ANY ~ % / ~ N ~ X % ~ o~ ~ I WRI~EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ % % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~o~os~o ,~ ~R,~O~ ~~ I OU~,OA~,O~ A~D U~ B~ ~OV~ME~T CONDUCIING THEIR ~WFULLY AUTHORIZED Z/~ ~ ~ X ~ X ' ~ ¢h~ ~O~O / / ~ ~ ( ISTJNg [ ~}l -- REGU~TORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ~;~ ~ ~ 1- ' ~ ~/ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED 'ZMOBILE NOR~' C~ TO~ ~ ~ ~n,, ' . --~EXISTINO FlEE TOWER FUNCTIONS I' SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF PROPOSED T-MOBILE NOR~ ANTENN~~ ~ D ~ X % ~ov~c~' ~ TO SCALE. MOUNTED INSIDE EXISTINg F~GPOLE (~P. m = AT&T OF 1 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3) o < k PERIM~ER FENCE ~, x~+ SITE ~ D~EXISTING GATE ~ co~c~ ~A~ EAST MARION FIRE EQUIPMENT ~YOUT P~N ~ ~AST ~A.~O~. ~ ~;9 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN NOT~: ~ REFER TO ~TEST RFDS SHEET NUMBER CO.T.ACTO~ TO ,MMED~ATEV .OT~ TU~ FOR ANTENNA/COAX ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES B~EEN THE EXISTIMG SITE CONDITIONS AND THAT INFORMATION WHICH ARE REPRESENTED HERE. T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 MAXTON TECHNOLOGy. INC, ~AY STATE DF. SIGN BAY SLATE DESIGN, [NC. Architects . Engineers !41 Boston Post Rd, West Phone: 508-229-4100 Marlborough, MA 01752 Fax: 508-455-5321 PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LEASE- AREA -- 2804` SQ. FT. (12'-0"x23'-3") 3'-o" (wP.) PROPOSED 6'-HIGH T-MOBILE~ NORTHEAST COMPOUND FENCE PROPOSED VEGETATIVE SCREENING AROUND NORTHEAST EQUIPMENT AREA TO BE PROVIDED BY T-MOBILE NORTHEAST - (28) EASTERN RED CEDAR TREES (MIN. 10 FEET TALL) (WP.) 4' O.C., (2) ROWS STAGGERED, 3' BETWEEN ROWS, MIN. OF 3' OUTSIDE PROPOSED COMPOUND FENCE 1, 1 EXISTING 6'-HIGH AT&T COMPOUND FENCE AT&T 5' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER (FROM CINGULAR (AT&T) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS DATED 3/50/2007) (~r'P. ON NORTH, EAST & WEST SIDES OF AT&T COMPOUND) PROPOSED VEGETATIVE SCREENING AROUND AT&'T EQUIPMENT AREA TO BE PROVIDED BY AT&T Per CINGU~R (AT&T) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS DATED 3/30/2007 - (12) EASTERN RED CEDAR TREES (MIN. 10 FEET TALL) (TYP.) X X X X X X X X X X g EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT AREA PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE EXISTING lID'-HIGH FLAG MONOPOLE EXISTING AT&T ICE BRIDGE -EXISTING ICE BRIDGE x ~x~ \ X X Xj x X II --1 ENGINEER 2902,03~ CHECKED BY: K w./K.~3. SUBMITTALS 04-09-10 ZONING FINAL 03-30-10i ZONING THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DEEIDI~ PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRIT]'EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED, IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11959 COMPOUND SCALE: 1/4"= 1'-0" LANDSCAPE PLAN0 SCALE: 1/4" SHEET TITLE COMPOUND LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTE; CONTRACTOR TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND THAT WHICH ARE REPRESENTED HERE. SHEET NUMBER Z ? NOTES 1. PROJECT OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A GLOBAL STRUCTURAL STABILITY ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE CAPACITY AND SUITABILIP( OF EXISTING ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE TO SAFELY CARRY ALL ADDITIONAL LOADS IMPOSED BY PROPOSED EQUIPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INCORPORATING ALL REQUIRED STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS INTO THEIR SCOPE OF WORK, ON EXISTING ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURES WITH FAA OBSTRUCTION MARKING, PAINT ANTENNAE MOUNTING HARDWARE, AND EXPOSED VERTICAL CABLE RUNS TO MATCH EXISTING HARDWARE PA~ERN (AVIATION ORANGE OR WHITE). LESSEE/LICENSEE "FUTURE" PANEL ANTENNAS ARE DEPICTED FOR THE PURPOSES OF DETERMINING TOWER/MONOPOLE STRUCTURAL CAPACITY, OBTAINING ZONINO APPROVALS AND BUILDING PERMITS. SUBSEQUENT ENDORSEMENT OR ACCEPTANCE OF THIS DRAWING BY THE TOWER OWNER IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PERMISSION OR APPROVAL TO INSTALL "FUTURE" ANTENNAS THAT EXCEED "PROPOSED" OR ACTUAL EQUIPMENT LISTED IN THE LESSEE/LICENSEE LEASE AGREEMENT. PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST MOUNTED INSIDE EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE (TYP. OF 1 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3). IO'-HIGH FIRE DEPARTMENT WHIP ANTENNA TOP OF EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE~, ELEV.: 110'-0" :t: AGL~¢'' ¢ OF EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS~I~, ELEV.: lOT 0" ± AGL~ OF FUTURE ANTENNAS~ ELBA/.: 97'-0" ± AGL~r~ TOP OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST ANTENNAS ~1~ ELEV.: 89'-4" 4- AGL ~ (~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST ANTENNAS ELEV.: 87'-0" 4- AGL REFER TO LATEST RFDS FOR ANTENNA/COAX INFORMATION NOTE' CONTRACTOR TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND THAT WHICH ARE REPRESENTED HERE. T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SI3NRISEHWY., Sbt'lED-203 GREAT RIVER, NYl1739 MA×TON TECHNOLOGY, BAY STATE F~SIGN BAY STATE DESIGN, rNC. Amhitects · Engineers 241 Boston Post Rd, West Phone: 508-229 4100 Morlberough, MA. 01752 Fox: 508-485-5321 7/8"¢ COAX OYP. Of 4 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 12). RUN INSIDE FLAGPOLE 110'-HIGH FLAG MONOPOLE I PROJECT I CHECKED BY: ENGINEER NO: 2902.034 SC K.W./K.B. SUBMITTALS API~ :' 3ilo (}4-09-10 ZONING FINAL ~ TOP OF PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINETS ~1~ ELEV,: T-O" ± AGL (~ PROPOSED 6'-TALL T-MOBILE NORTHEAS1 COMPOUND PERIMETER CHAIN LINK FENCE //~PROPOSEB T-MOBILE NORTHEAST% ~ CONCRETE PAD (8'-0"x22'-0") /~'"%/'~N, PROPOSED VEGETATIVE SCREENING AROUND T-MOBILE NORTHEAST EQUIPMENT~ / ' y ~ / AREA TO BE PROVIDED BY T-MOBLE NORTHEAST - (28) EASTERN RED ~CEDAR TREES (MIN. 10 FEET TALL) (13'P.} 4' O.C., (2) ROWS STAGGERED, 3' BETWEEN ROWS, MIN. OF 3' OUTSIDE PROPOSED COMPOUND FENCE (~ PROPOSED BBU CABINET (BEYOND) (~ PROPOSED UMTS OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED (2) ETS OUTDOOR EQI CABINETS WITH BOOSTERS (BEYOND) PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED ON ICE BRIDGE POST (12) COAX TO RUN UNDER PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE ON PROPOSED TRAPEZE PROPOSED 8'-HIGH (~NOR~HEAST ICE BRIDGE ~. OF EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT WHIP ANTENNAS TIMOBILE NORTHEAST COAX TO ENTER FLAGPOLE VIA EXISTING PORT HOLE AT&T COMPOUND PERIMETER FENCE VEGETATIVE SCREENING AROUND AT&T EQUIPMENT AREA TO BE ~ PROVIDED BY AT&T PER CINGULAR (AT&T) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS DATED [, 7-~ ~ 7-,~ ) 3/30/2007 - (12) EASTERN RED CEDAR TREES (MIN. 10 FEET TALL) (TYP.)~ ~ GROUND LEVEL~I~ ELEV,: 0'-0" · AGL ~r~ SOUTHWEST SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" ELEVATION 0 2'-8" 5'-4" 10'-8" SCALE: 3/16 = 1'-0" 03-30 10 ZONING THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MODLE NORTHEAST LLC ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRIT-EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFfCALLY ALLOWED, IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE LI 15-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SHEET TITLE ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER Z 3 o o ' pOST DAP T Mobile PROPOBED _ 4x3xl/4xO'-lO"LG (LLV) B, B Northeast LLC ~ ~ ,, BOLT '1 OR APPROVED~ ~ / ~ xo x5/8 3500S~ISE~.,SUITED-203 ~ ~3 ¢ STANDARD P~PE ~Q~('~I~ % % /BASE PL G~AT~R,~l1739 EMBEDMENT 0F'3 1/2") 1/4" LEVELING ~PROPOSED ANTENNA ~ / ~ /~ wA~mb~ CONCR~E PAD ~~ NON-SHRiNK ~PROPOSEDDowN_TiLT ANTENNABRACK~ I --- ~ ~ ~ ~ " L ~ ~AXTON TECHNOLOGY, INC. ,I [ ~ i~GALV, 6RIPDETAIL A ~S~N ~~P~OPOSED ANTENNA ~PROPOSED ANTENNA 2x2xS/16xl'-8" LG (SEE P~NS AND~ o o o W/ 3/4"¢ HOLES ~ ~ ~~PROPOSED ANTENNA $ m ~ ROD (1'-8" LO) ~ ,, BAY STATE DESIGN, INC, ~ ~ o o ~ [ --DOWN-TILT DRACK~ ~ ~ ~PROPOSED ANTENNA ~ ~COAX CABLE W/ _~ ~ 2 1/2 STD, FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW~bCONNECTORS SPECS / ~ ~ , 6"x5/8" ~ ~ ~ ~ % REAR VIEW~q ~ ~ FADAPTER KIT B1534 '~-- % ~. I~ ~ BY VALMONT OR EQUAL ~ BOSOM VIEW , 7 ANTENNA TECHNICAL FEATURES 5ooo PS~ ~CONCRETE 1, ALL STEEL SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. ALL BOLTS TO BE ANTENNA MAKE & MODEL I~FS APXI6BWV-16D~S-E-A2{~ [ I ~ PIER FURNISHED WITH LOCK WASHERS AND NUTS. DIMENSIONS H x W x D (EH.) 55.9" x ~3.3" x 3.15" ~ ~ j, .~ % WEIGHT (EXCL MOUNTING HDWR.) (LB,) 40 7 ~ , :, 2. SEE DETAIL "A" FOR MOUNTING ICE BRIDGE TO CONCRETE PAD. WEIGHT w/MOUNTING HARDWARE (LB.) ~ m "5 3. 5000 PSI COMMERCIAL "QUIK-CR~Z" MAY BE USED FOR PIERS. SURVIVAL WIND SPEED {M/HR) 125ANTENNAMOUNTINGD~AIL, FRONTAL THRUST (MAX, ¢ 160KM/H) ~177 SCALE: ~TS RADIATING ELEMENT MATERIAL BRASS ~ 18"¢ I RABOME MATERIAL FIBER6~SS MOUNTINO HARDWAREAPM40-2 + A~"~O-~* ICE BRIDGE DETAIL CONNECTOR ~PE (4} 7/16-DIN FEMALE SCALE: N,T.S. ANTENNA DETAIL ~ ~ NGTBO1MA SCALE: N.T.S. HPS-1 LIGHT%~ i I ~ ] BPS ANTENNA FIXTURE A~ACHED % I NOTE:~ ENGINE~ To OALVAN,ZE~ U~Hr FIXTURE TO eE MALE THC STEUL POLE, TOP W~THER-PROOF NEMA 250W ~CABLE TO OF LtOHTLoo~wAaH~R~F~XTURE I ~OTION-SENSOR 3R SWITCH ~OX ~MAsT~ANTENNATo ~ PROdECT NO: 2902.03~ CAP WITH 7/8''~ ANTENNA I DRAWN BY: SC ~ THREADED HOLE COUPLER NUT BPS CONNECTOR KIT~ ¢~[~ GALVANIZED STEEL (P/N: NTL579~/ CHECKED BY: K.W./K.B. I ~/N~pMOUNTiNG PIPE MASTwELDEDTO ToBEV~ ~ ~ 1 575 ~.~)/ /MAST ~LVANIZED STEEL DECIDUOUS TREE EVERGREEN TREE .AS~ P~TZ " ' S U B M ITTALS HILTI HIT HY-150 1/2" S/S ROD S~ CHEIMICAL ANCHOR, MIN. IN HILTI HIT HY-150~ 5-1/2" EMBEDMENT (~P.) ~GROMM~ NNA MOUNTING MIN, 3-1/2" ~ ~~ 8"xS"x,3/8 /GALVANIZED ~ I J ~ m PRUNE BRANCHES & FOLIAGE EMBEDMENT (~P.)~ /STEEL BASE -- --- '~ ~"¢ STD, PiPE TO ~%~ % /BY 1/5 WHILE R~AINING A[¢~ ~ ...... CONCRETE %~ 1 P~%E o ~ ) EQUIPMENT xkkk .% ~ , ~/ NATURAL SHAPE OF TREE. ~ o* GPSANTENNA DETAIL 1/2" D~OK~ ~%~ ~ R~ D4 09-10 ZONING FINAL ~ '~ -- ~ ~ ]= -I- =' SOALE: N.T.S. HOSES TO ~~ ~ R~ 0 03-30-~0 ZONING -~ ~ ~ /STAKES THIS OOOU~ENT JS THE CREATION, DESIGN, WITH ~~ ]'' ~/~ NO.] 2 WIRE PROPER~ AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF ~ ~ ~ANTENNA ~OUNTING ~ ~ W/TWISTED T-~OBILE NORTHEAST LLO. ANY TREE WRAP FRO~ . ~ ~l~ --/ ..... DUPLICATION O~ USE WJTHOUT EXPRESS J ~ SOALE: N.T,S.~ LOWEST ~AIN ~. ~ ~ /~ULCH AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF ~~ ~ ~3" BARK DUPLICATION AND USE DY GOVERNMENT / %SP~DER F~NGE BRANCH ~~% ~ (DECIDUOUS TREES X, ~ ~ CONDUCIING THEIR ~WFULLY AUIHOR[ZED ~ % ~ . CONTINUOUS ~RFS AWS TWIN TMA, FINISH X .' ~/ 2~;QH SAUCER UNTIE & FOLD BACK-- ' J / LI 13--345A BUR~P 1/3 BALL H~HT, SVNTH~C ~ ~ ~ " EAST MARION FIRE 50" OR TREATED 12 MIN. SPIDER F~NGE 10" COMPL~ELY ~,~~ UNDER ROOT BALL 9245 MAIN ROAD RZMOVED. ,,~~ ~EMBED STAKES MIN, ~ST MARION, NY 11939 6 MIN. 1'~0" INTO SUBSOIL AT BASE OF HOLE ~HEET TITLE ~ ~s 1/4" m. ~o~[ ~ VEGETATIVE SCREENING ~ SHEET NUMBER , , (wP, oF ~) TMA D~AIL TREE P~NTING & PRUNING ANTENNA ~c,,~. N.T.S. SCALE: N.T.S. 7 MOUNTING POLE DETAIL ~ SCALE: N.T.S. ANTENNA TECHNICAL FEATURES ANTENNA MAKE & MODEL NFS APX16DWV-16BWVS-E-A2{ DIMENSIONS H x W x B (IN.) 55.9" x WEIGHT (EXCL MOUNTING NDWR.) (LB,) 40 7 WEIGHT w/MOUNTING HARDWARE (LB.) SURVIVAL WIND SPEED (M/HR) 125 FRONTAL THRUST (MAX, @ 160EM/H) 177 RADIATING ELEMENT MATERIAL BRASS RADOME MATERIAL :IBERBLASS MOUNTING HARDWARE APM40-2 + APM40-E2 CONNECTOR TYPE (¢) 7/16-BIN FEMALE CAD[NETS: (2) NORTEL S12000 B/: i'-B" T Mobile --cq I' ' I EQUIPMENT CABINETS, SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE NORTHEAST. AND ~ I I ' 5'-6" 5' 6" 7", 2' 6" i --~-- INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. --- ] I' 'l I' '1 I- REEER TO C^D,N MANUE^CTURER "' No heast LLC m 4'-5" ' I SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS I ~OSTER [ -~ , , ~ FRONT BOOR > ~,o~os~ ~O~T[C I' [o, uo,~ ~O~AT~O~. Los~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HEIGHT: 75-1/8" ~ PROPOSED MAGN~EK ./ ~ PROPOSED MAGN~EK m - j~ 1 DEPTH: 27-1/2" II ~/ / I r - ~ BAKERY BACKUP ENCLOSURE BAKERY BACKUP ENCLOSURE % I G~AT ~R, ~ 11739 I k (W~TH COVER) I ~ PER UNiT II / 1'-5 1/2" i ~F ~ m ~ k I WEIGHT: 1212 LBS. ~ : i .I .~[~¢ ,x I ~ ELECTRIC REQUIRED: 230V to 240V . a .... II / [ ii ~ I I II P~OPOSD OONO~ET[2 I If~ / x II ~P~O~OSE~ ENOLOSU~E ¢¢~ 1'-11 5/8~ / ;I CABINET SUB-BASE: BOLT TO % R&Y STA~ P~N VIEW P~N - SUB-BASE ¢ II I' ~ SIDE VIEW 'B' ' ~/ . i .... ~ PROPOSED 8"-THICK REINFORCED ,. ~ DEIGN I I ,, .,T ] BOOSTER~ 3 1/2" EMBEDMENT (~p.) " ~ / ~1 o ~ CABIN~ ~ (SEE DETAIL 4, SHT. 11 = ~ _ PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (~P.)~ BAY STATS DESIGN, iNC. 7 ~ TO SECURE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT o FRONT VIEW 'A' 'B' /.. ~ CAB[N~ SUB-BASE: BOLT TO SIDE VIEW 2~ Boston Post Rd West Phone: 508-229-4~00 / x PROPOSED 8"-THICK REINFORCED Morlborough, MA, 01752 F~x: 508-485-5321 / . .. ~ ~ou~o co,c~ ~A~ o~ MAGNETEK SPECTRUM MPE5566 m / % ~ ,. ,. ' ;~' ~IN "ILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ~ BAKERY BACKUP ENCLOSURE ~ ~ % ~ I ." ' " '. ' ' EMBEDMENT (~P.) SCALE: N.T.S, ~ / % [ (SEE D~AIL 4, SHT. A-4) / FRONT VIEW 'A' 'C' ~ kk /'/ TO SECURE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABIN~ ~SIDE VIEW x ~ ,[,~o~ ~ou~[~ co~,~ ~A~ o~ BOOSTER CABINET DETAIL HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS, MIN. 5 ~~ SCALE: N.T.S. X~,/ (SEE D~AIL 4, SHT, A-4) %- II / % ~ . ~: ~:~~ CONDUIT TO ELECTRICAL PANEL FRONT VIEW 'A' SIDE VIEW 'B' ' NORTEL S-12000 ETS / - '"/-//' EQUIPMENT OABINET DETAIL ~ " ¢ ~ ',,-o,, II / : / / ~/ / // // /, /x/ ' ,~ ~ EQUIPMENT CAB N~ S~ ATOP SUB-BASE SCALE: N,T.S.~ ~ ~/ ~ / / / '"' / ~ , / /r / ' /' ./ / '/ [/ //." ~" // ./ / / ~11/16"¢ HOLE FOR MOUNTING SUB-BASE TO STEEL P~N VIEW P~N - MOUNTING ~ ~ ./ // ///' / ,,/~-~//DUNNAGE OR CONCR~E PAD, FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S 2' 0" BRACKET TEMP~TE [ B ~ ~ ~ : .~. /: /~ / /SPECS AND NSTAL~TON PROCEDURES ENGINEER OUTDOOR BASE STATION CABIN~, SUPPLIED BY I~ ~l~ ' ./ ~' , 7 ~ r -- -- I I T-MOBILE NORTH~ST, AND INSTALLED BY GENERATOR INL~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PROdECT NO: 2902.034 64" ERICSSON OVER/UNDER POWER% .... f PROTECTION CABIN~ (PPC)~ 0 I .o / DEPTH: TO SECURE PROPOSED ~ / CELL CAPACI~: 1-12 CELL-CARRIERS PER CABINET o EQUIPMENT CABINET SUB-BASE:~ 7 SCREENED LOUVRES FOR~ -- WEIGHT: 1874 LBS. FULLY EQUIPPEDBA~ERy)(3X4 ~1 BOLT TO PROPOSED 8"-THICK% N TELCO COMPARTMENT~ P~N ACCESS COVER ACCESS COVER P~N _ % : ~ ,, ~ SUBMITTALS CONFISURATION, 20~ Ah RE~NFORCED POURED PROPOSED PPC MOUNTING ~ CABLE A~CESS I ' 9" ~ I , -~/~ , CABLE ACCESS HILTI HIT HY 150 CHEMICAL ~ ~ ,., ~ , ~ ~; ~ . 4'-5" ~ ~ 000 000% 000 000 000 % '] , , ~" "l PLAN VIE~ EMBEDMENT (~P,) ''' - ' .:', .' 000 000 7 000 000 000 T , '% ',,, ~J I, ~ (SEE D~AIL 4. SHT. A-4) ~PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (~P.) o~ ~_° ; ",-~ .... [ rl:j" ' RES 3106 WCDMA ~~FABRIC ~ CENTER OF S~B FRONT VIEW 'A' SIDE VIEW 'B' ELEVATION 'A' EL~ATION 'B' _ ~ MACRO OUTDOOR BASE 8,, COMPACT~ ~ ', ~ ]'",,,',"' ]',":~1, ~ ST*T,OX c*,~,~ o,*WU%..~_ ~I ERICSSON PPC BOX DETAIL ~ ETS SUB-BASE DETAIL I I / CROSS-SECTION lO' o" o,c, (~P.) 4'-o" ii / THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION. DESIGN, ~ ~3 ROWS ALUMINIZED ~ SITE SIGNAGE~ ~ ' O TE ' 1 1/2"¢ NPS TOP RAI~ I I / ANGLE BARBED WIRE FRAME.~ GATE~ & BRACE SCH, 40 (~P. PROPER~ AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF I~ / CONCRETE PAD DETAIL / ~y_ .'_: ou~ucAr~O~ o~ / ........................................................................................................................................................................ WRI~EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBIIED. I ~ ¢¢ / - - CONDUCTIMG THEIR ~WFULLY AUTHORIZED ~ REGU~IORY AND ADMINISIRATIVE ~= ~~ /% ..~ ~x /x /x/ /x /x /~ THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT 3'-0" m ~ ~ TO SCALE. I I I I . - : sT~T~o~ cm,~_ ~o ~ LI 13-345A ¢~- o,~< EAST MARION FIRE % POURED CONCRETE PAD ON GRADE ,~ ~_~ [~ EAST MARION, NY 11939 %%... ~ WITH 1/2" S/S RODS S~ IN HILTI ~ , ~ ~ II I1~ ~ ~ ~ ,: ! III SHEET TITLE % (SEE DETAIL 4, SHT. A-4) R P SE CONCRETE PAD (~P.) ~ ~., DETAILS FRONT VIEW 'A' SiDE VIEW 'B' ~ FOUNDATIoNCONCRETE :~,. 10"¢x56" (~P,) I SHEET NUMBER ERICSSON RBS 3106 UMTS ..... ',__ SINGLE-GATE CHAIN ---~ ~_~ BASE STATION CABINET DETAIL~ LINK FENCE D~AIL ~ I- ~'-o" T RES/DEN T/AL iI.l~ VACANT / 500' 0 o 33 9 = ZONING DISTR/CT DICELLING BUSINESS COTTAGE = POST OFFICE OUT BUILDING MAP OF PROPER TIES SHOWING LAND USES A T EAST MARION 7'OWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. 1000 - 31 - 03 - 11.31 Scale, 1"= 100' March, 15, 2010 APRIL 5, 2010 (revisions) T APR 2 8 2010 (631) 7'65 - P, O. BOX 909 Ig30 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD~ N. Y. 11971 ~96/8 - 1797 02-251 AREA=3.0583 ACRES SUFFOLK % OF PROPERTY AT L~!S2' i~f:iAYOA: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY, N. K 1000--31--03--11.31 SCALE: 1'=30' NOVEMBER 5, 2009 ,oo"w ~06.~4 · =MONUMENT ANY AL TERATZON OR AJ]BZTZON TO TH~-$ SURVEY Z~ A VIOLATZON OF SECTION 7~09 OF Th[ NE~I YORK STATE EDUCATION 9618 P.C. ¢6~1) 765 - 50£0 FAX <631) 765-1797 P, O, BOX 909 ~30 TR,~VELER STREET 0 2- 2 SOUTHOLB, ~Y, 11971 T-Mobile ~o~ ~,~., ~ ~ ,.~ ~ Northeast LLC ¢~ ~ .'<-- ~ ~',/~ w_L~ ~y?,,m~ ~. ~..'.,,~.,. ,. / m~,~ . ,. '/4 ~ G~AT ~VER, ~ 11739 .... PROPOSED T-MO~ILE NORTH~ST k~SE ~~,_ : ~ ~ /,~ - ~o~ ~. ~. o~.-o..~.-~..~ '"~'" ~ ~ , ~ , / , ..,,,~rO~ m m/ / ~m ,~ ~d ~ 8oston Post RdWest~ESlgN,phone 508--229-~100 PROPOSED VEG~ATIVE SCREENING AROUND T-MOBILE~~/. I //~ m- 7%/bD II NORTH~ST EQUIPMENT AR~ TO BE PROVIDED BY T-MOBILE ¢~t~ ~ ~ ~FE~ T~L) (WP.) 4' O.C.,, (2) ROWS STAGGERED, 3' 8~EEN ~'~g)~/-- ~ ~ ~¢~ xl ~ / - ~ xl ~ ATaT 5' WraP: :NDSCAPE BUFFER (FROM CINGU:R (ATaT)% "~ ~ ~( ~ /~. % 4 m ~ ~ ~ ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS BATED 5/50/2007) (TYP ON ~ ..... ~ m/ I mq~ ?1/ DRAWN BY: SC NEWLY P~.TED W~ATIVE SCREE,,NG AROUNO AT.T/ ''/"'"~ n x ~- x x --x , x ,' x ¢ ~d/~ I '0~ ~ REV 2 08-27 1~ PER TOWN COMMENTS ,~t, -x ut, ~,-,, , I /%,,,,/ ~ ,'-"/ ~ PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF ~ - / : o ~ DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS :, ~¢ ~¢ ~ ~ ,;~,,, E~~ ;~';;,~ """' CARRIERS WILL MAINTAIN FUNCTION% '% SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED IF ~ , ~ . "4~v4 ~~" SCREENING FOR THE THIS DRAWING mSToNOTscALE.24"X36", IT IS NOT ~ .,a ,,,,,,..~/~ ,.,,,~/:~ LIFE OF THE FACILITY. I o .' ~/~ ~ ~ ~, ~ SfTE ~ ~. _~ ~. S~? -t :~ EAST MARION, NY m 1939 COMPOUND ~NDSCAPE P~N~ o ='-o" ~'-~" .' o" S:BT TITLE sc,:. 1/c=l'-o"~ ~ COMPOUND SCALE: ~/4" = ~' 0" LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTE' SHEET NUMBER _1 PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LEASE AREA = 280+ SQ. FT. (12'-0"x23'-3") (MIN.) 3'-0" (TYPO PROPOSED 6'-HIGH T-MOBILE~ NORTHEAST COMPOUND FENCE PROPOSED VEGETATIVE SCREENING AROUND NORTHEAST EQUIPMENT AREA TO BE PROVIDED BY T-MOBILE NORTHEAST - (1OO4.) EASTERN RED CEDAR TREES (MIN. 10 FEET TALL) (TYPO 4' O.C., (2) ROWS STAGGERED, 3' BETWEEN ROWS, MIN. OF 3' OUTSIDE PROPOSED COMPOUND FENCE EXISTING 6'-RIGH AT~T COMPOUND X X--X X X X X X X AT&T 5'-WIDE LANDSCAPE DUFFER (FROM CINGULAR (, CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS DATED 3/50/2007) (TYP, ON NORTH, EAST & WEST SIDES OF AT&T COMPOUND) IT NEWLY PLANTED VEGETATIVE SCREENING AROUND AT&T EQUIPMENT AREA, PROVIDED BY AT&T PER CINGULAR (AT&T) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS DATED 3/30/2007 - (12) EASTERN RED CEDAR TREES (MIN. 10 FEET TALL) (TYP.) Lx - EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT AREA · BRIDGE PROPOSED - EXISTING AT&T ICE X -- X X X ICE BRIDGE EXISTING 110'-HIGH FLag MONOPOLE EXISTING ICE BRIDGE COMPOUND LANDSCAPE PLAN0 SCALE 1/4"=1' 0" 0 2'-0" 4' 0" 8' 0" SCALE' 1/4" = 1'-0" CARRIERS WILL MAINTAIN SCREENING FOR THE LIFE OF THE FACILITY. NOTE. CONTRACTOR TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN TNE EXISTING BITE CONDITIONS AND THAT WHICH ARE REPRESENTED HERE. T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRiSE HWY., SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 1 3XTON MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, IFC BAY STATE BAY STATE DESIGN, IFC 241 Boston Post Rd Wes~ Phone 508 229 4100 Marlborough, MA 01752 Fox. 508 485 5321 ENGINEER I CHECKED BY: K.W./K.B. I SUBMITTALS PER TOWN COMMENTS ZONING FINAL ZONING THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MODLE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED, IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X56", IT IS NOT TO SCALE SITE _',! ," LI 13-345A '~AST MARION FIRE ,,DEPARTMENT \ 9245 MAIN ROAD -- EAST MARION, NY 11939 SHEET TITLE COMPOUND LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER / 2 APPROVAL REVI EW FORM ROBERT S. MAYO CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER MAXTON TEGRNOLOGY NAMIT SHARMA RF MANAGER T-MOBILE NORTHEAST SENIOR RF ENGINEER MAZEN ALADWAN RE PERFORMANCE T-MOBILE NORTHEAST MANAGER ENGINEERING, RF RHOAN GORDON RF ENGINEER - T-MOBILE NORTHEAST RF ENGINEER JOHN J. COUGHLIN - RG, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP ATTORNEY TODD PADREZA ZONING SPECIALIST - MAXTOR TECHNOLOGY TODD PADREZA SITE ACQUISITION MANAGER - MAXTOR TECHNOLOGY PAUL LaPASOTA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST CONSTRUCTION MANAGER EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT - Robert Hicks L~NDLORD/OWNER CONTACT AT&T MOBILITY - Raymond Crews TOWER OWNER - CONTACT Q_JUN 2~ 2010 T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY, SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SITE TYPE: COLOCATION ON EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE VICINITY MAP DIRECTIONS N i~ NO SCALE 1. HEAD NORTH ON CONNETQUOT AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 0.2 MILE TO THE ON-RAMP HIGHWAY (ROUTE 27) EAST, 2. TAKE SUNRISE HIGHWAY (ROUTE 27) EAST APPROXIMATELY 22.6 MILES. 3. TAKE EXIT 61 FOR CR-51N TOWARD RIVERHEAD, AND FOLLOW FOR 6.5 MILES. FOR SUNRISE 4. TURN RIGHT ONTO CR--63N, LAKE AVENUE/EAST MORICHES RiVERHEAD ROAD, AND FOLLOW FOR 1.7 MILES. 5. ENTER THE ROUNDABOIUT AND TAKE SECOND EXIT ONTO NY-24E, FLANDERS ROAD, AND FOLLOW FOR 1.2 MILES. 6. TURN LEFT ONTO CR-IOBN, CROSS RIVER DRIVE, AND FOLLOW FOR ,5.8 MILES. 7. TURN RIGHT ONTO CR--43, NORTHVILLE TURNPIKE, AND FOLLOW FOR 0.5 MILE. 8. TURN RIGHT ONTO sOUND AVENUE, AND FOLLOW FOR 5.4- MILES. 9, STAY STRAIGHT TO GO ONTO CR-4-8E, MIDDLE ROAD, AND FOLLOW FOR 1.5.4- MILES. 10. CR-48 BECOMES NY--25, MAIN ROAD. FOLLOW FOR 1.7 MILES. END AT 9245 MAIN ROAD. THE EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL BE ON YOUR LEFT. NOTE. COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IS NOT PERMITTED ON PARKWAYS, VERIFY ALL ROUTES. SHEET INDEX SHT. REV. NO. DESCRIPTION NO. T-1 TITLE SHEET 6 GN-1 NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS 6 C-1 PROPERTY SURVEY 6 A-1 SITE PLAN & EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN 6 A-2 COMPOUND LANDSCAPE PLAN 6 A-3 ELEVATION 6 A-4 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 6 A-5 EQUIPMENT & CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 6 ANTENNA & CABLE SCHEDULE, BILL OF A-6 MATERIALS, & ROUTING SCHEMATIC 6 ONE-LINE AND GROUNDING RISER E-1 DIAGRAMS, AND GROUNDING NOTES 6 E-2 ELECTRICAL & GROUNDING RETAILS 6 PROJECT U ~ SITE N MBt-~R: SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: SUMMARY LI 13-545A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 924-5 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 MUNICIPALITY: SOUTHOLD COUNTY: SUFFOLK ASSESSORS INFO: SECTION 31, BLOCK 3, ZONING: R-40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW (PROJECT LIES WITHIN R-40 HB (HAMLET BUSINESS) LATITUDE: 41' 07' 42.24" N LONGITUDE: 72' 20' 27.96" W CONSTRUCTION I~PE: PROPERTY CONTACT: PROPERTY OWNER: TOWER OWNER: TOWER CONTACT: APPLICANT: EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE (COLOCATION) ROBERT HICKS 651-477-0539 (EMFD) EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT PO BOX 162 (924-5 MAIN ROAD) EAST MARION, NY 11959 AT&T MOBILITY PO BOX 97079 REDMOND, WA 98073 9779 LOT 11.51 DENSITY AA) ZONE) RAYMOND CREWS NE REGIONAL ACCOUNT 201-208-5158 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY., GTE. GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 651-224-6651 MANAGER D 205 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE T-MOBILE REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING OF DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, INC. ]BAY STATE BAY STATE DESIGN, INC. Architects · EnG~neers 241 Boston Post Rd, West Phone, 508-229-410B Marlborough, MA, 01752 Fax: 508-485-5321 ENGINEER I PROJECT NO: 2902.054 I DRAWN BY: sc K.W./K.B. SUBMITTALS I I 11-12-09 REV, FOR BLDG. PERMIT 10-26-09 REV. FOR BLDG. 09-25-09 REV. FOR BLDG 09-14-09 REV. FOR BLDG. 09-02-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 08-28-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 08 18-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 07-22-09 CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE LI 15-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER 1 GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES ABBREVIATIONS AC A/C A,R COND,T,ONER MGB MASTER GROQND BAR T-Mobile ADd ADJUSTABLE MLO MAIN LUGS ONLY 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS 19. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST STANDARD 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN THUS -- ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND Northeast LLC OF LOCAL, COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS, ORDINANCES, AND TRADE PRACTICES. EACH TRADE SHALL COOPERATE WITH OTHER ELEVATIONS WHICH AFFECT THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS WITH OWNER AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR M~N MINIMUM REGULATIONS, WHEREVER APPLICABLE. TRADES TO FACILITATE JOB SCHEDULING AND COMPLETION. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AFC ABOVE FINISHED GRADER MTL METAL 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203 2. THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN 20. PROPRIETARY NAMES IDENTIFYING ITEMS OF WORK ARE USED TO 2. NORTH ARROW SHOWN ON PLANS REFERS TO TRUE NORTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TRUE NORTH AND INFORM APPROX APPROXIMATE N NEUTRAL GRF~TR~E1LNYl1739 THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPE DESIGNATE THE STANDARD OF CONSTRUCTION. ITEMS OF EQUAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION. AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE NEC NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE OF WORK THE CONTRACTOR BIDDING THE JOB IS NEVERTHELESS QUALITY MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ARCHITECT'S REVIEW AND CAUTIONED THAT MINOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS IN THE DRAWINGS APPROVAL. 5. THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS AND A-I ANTENNA MARK NO, NIC NOT IN CONTRACT AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE SAID CONTRACTOR FROM INSPECTIONS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE WORK BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER, THE STATE, COUNTY, AND/OR ETS BASE TRANSMISSION STATION NTB NOT TO SCALE COMPLETING THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 21. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY. THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. ADJOINING REMAINING AREAS AS A RESULT OF HIS WORK, AND SHALL C CONDUIT OC O.C. ON CENTER REPAIR DAMAOED SURFACES TO THEIR PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS OR AS 4. ANTENNA INSTALLATION SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY FIELD CREWS EXPERIENCED IN THE ASSEMBLY AND ERECTION OF 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE ENTrRE SCOPE OF THE WORK. RADIO ANTENNAS, TRANSMISSION LINES, AND SUPPORT STRUCTURES. CB CIRCUIT BREAKER OPP OPPOSITE MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, INC, AND INSPECTIONS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE WORK BY THE PHOTOGRAPH EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT (P) PROPOSED ARCHITECT/ENGINEER, THE STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 5. COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTORS AND TRANSMI]~ER EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AND IS NOT BAY STATE AUTHORITY. 22. ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE PATCHED AND FINISHED, AS INCLUDED iN THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. A SCHEDULE OF OWNER-SUPPLIED MATERIALS IS ATTACHED TO CONC CONCRETE PCS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS NECESSARY, TO MATCH EXISTING CONTIGUOUS SURFACES OR NEW THE BID DOCUMENTS. ALL OTHER HARDWARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONNECTION HARDWARE COPT CONTINUOUS SERVICES 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS AS FINISHES SHOWN. SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. CJ CONSTRUCTION JOINT PL PROPERTY LINE THEY APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. 25. AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORKDAY, EACH TRADE SHALL BE 6. ANTENNAS, SUPPORTS, AND CABLE MOUNTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING SURFACES TO WHICH THEY ARE B DEPTH PNL PANEL 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING UP THEIR OWN WORK. RUBBISH REMOVAL A~ACHED. PAINT SHALL BE SHERWlN WILLIAMS, COROTHANE II. SURFACE PREPARATION AND APPLICATION SHALL DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE SHALL BE DONE IN A DUST INHIBITIVE FASHION, AND THE JOB SITE BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND LESSEE/LICENSSEE GUIDELINES. DIA DIAMETER PP POWER PANEL BAY STATE DESIGN. INC FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES SHALL BE FREE OF ALL DEBRIS AND BROOM CLEAN UPON COMPLETION. PPC POWER PROTECTION CABINET Architects · Engineers AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE 7. COORDINATLON, LAYOUT, AND FURNISHING OF CONDUITS, CABLES, AND ALL APPURTENANCES REQUIRED FOR PROPER DN DOWN WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 24. CLEAN ALL FLOORS, WALLS, DOORS, MISC., GLASS, ETC., LEAVING JOB INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL AND TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DWG DRAWING PT PRESSURE-TREATED Marlborou§h,241 Boston POStMA.Rd.01752West Fax.Ph°ne: 508-229-4100508_485_5321 FREE OF DUST AND DEBRIS, PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR. EOB EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION CONTROL SURVEYS, AND FOR ESTABLISHING 25. EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED, WHICH ARE NOT 8. PER FCC MANDATE, ENHANCED EMERGENCY (E911) SERVICE IS REQUIRED TO MEET NATIONWIDE STANDARDS FOR (E) EXISTING RA RIGID ALUMINUM AND MAINTAINING ALL LINES AND GRADES REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT ALL REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED OR RETAINED BY THE OWNER, SHALL IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREIN. BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND BE REMOVED FROM WIRELESSAND ANTENNAsCOMMUNICATIONSGENERALLY DEPICTEDSYSTEMS' oNLESSEE/LICENSEE'STHIS PLAN, ATTACHEDIMPLEMENTATIONTo OR MOUNTEDREQUIRESIN CLosEDEPLOYMENTpRoXIMITyOFToEQUIPMENTTHE ETS EA EACH REINF. REINFORCED THE PREMISES. RADIO CABINETS. LESSEE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE REASONABLE MODIFICATIONS TO E911 EQUIPMENT AND ELEC ELECTRICAL RGB RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION LOCATION, AS TECHNOLOGY EVOLVES, TO MEET REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS. SCH SCHEDULE OF BIDS OR PERFORMING WORK TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE 26. INDICATIONS OF WORK TO BE REMOVED ARE GENERAL ONLY, AND ARE EL ELEVATION FIELD CONDITIONS AND TO VERIFY THAT THE PROJECT CAN BE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS WHICH MAY REQUIRE REMOVAL. SF So. Fr. SQUARE FOOT CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. SUCH ITEMS SHALL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED, AND/OR REINSTALLED, AS 9. COMPLETETHE CONTRACTORALL WoRKSHALLAssOCIATEDCOORDINATEwITHALLTHEWORKRooF.WITHTHETHEcoNTRACToRBUILDING OWNER'SsHALL OBTAINROOFINGwRITTENCONTRACTORAPPROvALWHOFRoMWILL THE EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK. BUILDING OWNER'S ROOFING CONTRACTOR BEFORE INSTALLATION OF ANY ROOF-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT OR EQ EQUAL SHT SHEET 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, PENETRATIONS. EQUIp EQUIPMENT SIM SIMILAR PROPERTY LINES, ETC., ON THE JOB. 27. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD-FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXT EXTERIOR SS STAINLESS STEEL 9 THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, DIRT, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH, AND SHALL REMOVE ALL EQUIPMENT NOT EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR DEEMED SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SHALL BE FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION STD STANDARD NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR ELECTRICAL DESIGN CRITERIA NOTES FO FINISHED GRADE STL STEEL SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. ,o ,N ALL CASES, DRAW,NOS SHALL NOT BE SCALED FOR ,NFORMAT,ON. DA GAUGE TOC TOP OF CONCR E FIGURED DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. 28. THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT AUTHORIZE THE DETERMINATION OF THE THE PRESENCE, NOR THE REMOVAL, OF ASBESTOS OR OTHER 1. ELECTRIC: NEW 20G-AMP SERVICE WITH ~20/240V, 2P, 5-WIRE FEEDER FROM A RELIABLE SOURCE TO THE GALV GALVANIZED TOM TOP OF MASONRY 11. TIlE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A FULL SET OF CONSTRUCTION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. IF DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT, COMMUNICATION CABINET. THIS SOURCE SHALL BE LOCKED ON WITH A CB LOCK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OC GENERAL CONTRACTOR TYP PFPICAL DOCUMENTS AT THE SITE, UPDATED WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS AND ASBESTOS OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIAL CONTAMINATION IS PROVIDE 20 SPARE FUSES WHEREVER A FUSED DISCONNECT IS REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ADDENDUMS OR CLARIFICATIONS AVAILABLE, FOR THE USE BY ALL SUSPECTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CARRIER'S PROJECT (BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED) THAT THE POWER SOURCE IS BETWEEN 208V AND 240V, LINE TO LINE. GWB OYPSUM WALLBOARD UON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED MANAOER WITHIN 24 HOURS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUSPEND WORK IN IF IT IS NOT BETWEEN THE SPECIFIED VOLTAGE, THEN CALL THE ARCHITECT. (ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL H HT HEIGHT UL UNDERWRITERS LABORATORY PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. THE AFFECTED AREA UNTIL SUCH A TIME THAT SAID AREA IS CERTIFIED BE LABELED WITH BLACK PLASTIC TAGS BEARING "OMPT" WHITE LETTER ENGRAVING. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT CONTAMINATION-FREE. IN THE INTERIM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL JT JOINT VIF VERIFY LN FIELD EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, ETC., DURING ENDEAVOR TO RESCHEDULE WORK TO AREAS UNAFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUSPECTED CONTAMINATION, IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE DELAY TO THE 2. UTILITY METER: IF A UTILITY METER IS SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LD LONG W WlBTB REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULE. PRIOR TO SUSPENDING WORK, MAKE WORK OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS, CUT-IN CARDS, ETC., THAT ARE REQUIRED TO SET THE METER. THE ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY AREAS SAGE, AND WHERE NECESSARY, WATERPROOF. CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND CAN PROVIDE THE ELECTRICAL DESIGNER'S LNA LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER WP WEATHER-PROOF ENGINEER NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR UTILITY-RELATED QUESTIONS. IF TEMPORARY POWER IS MAX MAXIMUM W WT WEIGHT 15. THE CONTRACTOR OR BIDDER SHALL BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF 29. ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE IN FULL REQUIRED, ALL NEC AND/OR LOCAL ELECTRIC CODES SHALL BE ADHERED TO. CONTACT OMNIPOINT NOTIFYINO (IN WRITING) THE LESSEE REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY CONFORMANCE WITH N.Y.S. UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION AND BUILDING COMMUNICATIONS PRIOR TO MAKING TEMPORARY POWER CONNECTIONS. MOB MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC PROJECT NO: 2902.0,34 CONFLICTS, ERRORS, OR OMISSIONS PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF CODE, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. ~. TELEPHONE: NEW TELEPHONE SERVICES IN NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, AND CONNECTICUT SHALL INCORPORATE A MDP MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL W/& AND WiTH CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL OR PERFORMANCE OF WORK. IN THE EVENT 50. ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED BY AN ELECTRICIAN LICENSED NEW 4-INCH CONDUIT WITH A DRAGLINE FROM THE SPECIFIED UTILITY POLE TO THE LOCATION OF THE NEW MECH MECHANICAL OF DISCREPANCIES,'P THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE MORE IN NEW YORK STATE AND IN SUFFOLK COUNTY. ELECTRICAL WORK DEMARCATION POINT. IN NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, AND CONNECTICUT, A NEW 2 INCH CONDUIT (WITH (2) #8768 © AT COSTLY OR EXTENSIVE WORK, UNLESS DIRECTED IN WRITING OTHERWISE. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE AND NATIONAL BELDEN CABLES) IS REQUIRED FROM THE COMMUNICATIONS CABINET TO THE MAIN DEMARCATION POINT. IN MFR MANUFACTURER ¢ DIAMETER CHECKED BY: K.W./K.B. ELECTRICAL CODES. A NEW YORK BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITER'S MULTIPLE-STORY BUILDINGS, WITH THE APPROVAL OF TEE LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPANY, IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY CERTIFICATE SMALL BE OBTAINED FOR ALL ELECTRICAL WORK, AND COST, NOISE GENERATION, AND DIST~RUPTION TO EXISTING BUILDING FUNCTIONS, AN ALTERNATE DEMARCATION GYM BO LS AN D MATER IALS DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS / CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. SUPPLIED TO THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT. POINT CLOSER TO THE CELLULAR EQUIPMENT MAY BE SPECIFIED. S U B MITTALS 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FIELD 31. PROVIDE ANY AND ALL TREATED WOOD BLOCKING/BACKING OR ~4 GA. 4. CONDUIT ROUTING: THE ROUTING OF THE CONDUIT SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE EASIEST AND MOST PRACTICAL DIMENSIONS AND JOB CONDITIONS, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT GALV. FLAT STOCK BACKING AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE PROPER AND METHODS ARE EMPLOYED WITH MINIMAL IMPACT UPON THE ONGOING SiTE ACTIVITIES AND THE AESTHETIC APPEAL OF E~o NEW ANTENNA WORK ITEM NOTE OR ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, AND/OR OMISSIONS WHICH WOULD ADEQUATE SUPPORT (IN COMPLIANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE BUILDING THE SAID SITE. THE WORK BEINO DONE MAY BE WITHIN EXISTING STRUCTURES. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ~:b EXISTING ANTENNAS INTERFERE WITH THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE WORK. CODE MINIMUM LOADING REQUIREMENTS WHERE APPLICABLE) OF AND IT IS NOT THE iNTENT TO SHOW EVERY JUNCTION BOX, I.D. CONDUIT BEND, ETC., BUT RATHER TO INDICATE ~ MATCH LINE REV 611-12-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMR SHOULD HE FAIL TO FOLLOW THIS PROCEDURE AND CONTINUE WITH VARIOUS ITEMS, INCLUDING BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO: COMPLETE SYSTEMS AND THE DESIGN INTENT. IT IS FOR THIS REASON THAT THE CONTRACTOR MUST VISIT THE ~'x~ ASPHALT ~ WORK POINT THE WORK, HE SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY HANDRAILS, SHELVING, CABLE TRAYS, CONDUITS, ETC. CONTRACToRSITE BEFORE SHALLSUBMI~INGPROVIDETHEALLBID COMPONENTsAND UNDERSTANDAND APPURTENANcEsTHE TRUE NATURENEcESSARy,OF THE REQUIREMENTSwHETHER OR ATNoTTHATsHowNSITE.oN k~, REV 519-26-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMP ARISING THEREFROM. 32. A.D.A. COMPLIANCE: THE FACILITY ES A NORMALLY UNOCCUPIED MOBILE THE DRAWINGS, FOR A COMPLETE AND FUNCTIONING SYSTEM, AND SHALL INCORPORATE ALL COSTS FOR THE SAME [] NEW ACCESS EASEMENT ~ INSULATED GROUND BAR REV 409-25-0~ REV. FOR BLDG. PERMIT 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LESSEE REPRESENTATIVE WHERE A RADIO FACILITY. IN THE BASE BID. [] CONCRETE ~ INSULATED GROUND BAR REV 309-14 OC~ REV. FOR BLDG. PERMH CONFLICT OCCURS ON ANY OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE 5. EQUIPMENT: ALL PANELS, DISCONNECTS, AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SQUARED, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY REV 209-02 O~c FOR BUILDING PERMIT CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO ORDER MATERIAL, OR CONSTRUCT ANY PORTION 55. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE SECTIOiNS OF OF THE WORK THAT IS IN CONFLICT, UNTIL THE CONFLICT IS RESOLVED THE NEW YORK STATE BUILDING CODE 2007, AND NEC 2005, A~ND THE ARCHITECT OR OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER. ~ ELECTRIC BOX ~ UNINSULATED GROUND BAR REV 108-28-0~c FOR BUILDING PERMIT OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF ANY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. ~ LIGHT POLE REV A 08-18-0~c FOR BUILDING PERMIT BY THE LESSEE REPRESENTATIVE. 34. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION WAS DETERMINED FROM r///x4~/×////.x.//~ EXISTING CONSTRUCTION 17. ALLITEMS OF WORK ,DENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS BYNAME, NOTE, OR SURFACE INVESTIGATIONSAND EXISTING PLANS OF RECORD. THEWIRING CRITERIA NOTES REV O0722-0~c CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL DESIGNATION ARE NEW, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE FIELD ELECTRICAL UTILITY POLES I,-'-::'-,'. -- I GROUT OR PLASTER PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK. CALL THE FOLLOWING FOR ALL [ ~ , GYPSUM WALL BOARD /8. ALL NEW MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY 0 FND. MONUMENT THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, WITH THE MANUFACTURERS' LATEST PRINTED SPECIFICATIONS AND WITH EXCAVATION ACTIVITY: DIG-SAFE SYSTEM (NY): 811 OR f - ~3 PLYWOOD PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF ALL APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 1-800-962-7962 1. GENERAL: ALL WIRING IN FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE CONCEALED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. IN UNFINISHED ~ SPOT ELEVATION T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY AREAS SUCH AS BASEMENTS, MECHANICAL ROOMS, ELECTRICAL CLOSETS, ETC., WIRING SHALL BE ROUTED ON THE fi// / ' / ~¢1 STEEL DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURERS' AND INTERIOR SURFACE. NO WIRING SHALL BE ROUTED ON THE OUTSIDE SURFACES OF THE BUILDING UNLESS ~ BET POINT VENDORS' SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL SPECIFICALLY NOTED. ALL N.E.C. AND LOCAL ELECTRIC CODES SHALL BE ADHERED TO. ALL CONDUCTORS SHALL I'. " ' ' I CONCRETE WRIDENDuPLiCATioNCONSENTANDISusESTRICTLYBy GOVERNMENTPROHIBITED' CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. BE COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. (~ GROUND TEST WELL Illl~ili__Tliii~iiiiTl~I EARTH AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED 2, BELOW GRADE (UNDERGROUND IN EARTH OR FILL~: ALL CONDUITS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM BURIAL DEPTH OF 2& Tx.' ",'.."," REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE INCHES. BRANOH CIRCUITS SHALL CONSISTS OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN DIRECT-BURIED SCHEDULE 40 PVC (~ GROUND ROD ["?,,,%';,"'"?~:",Y'I GRAVEL FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF GEN E RAL SITE NOTES CONDU,TS. WHERE HEAVY VEHICLE TRAFFIC OVER CONDUIT RUNS IS ANTICIPATED, THE CONDUIT SHALL BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE. CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SHALL BE 5 INCHES MINIMUM ALL AROUND AND BETWEEN CONDUITS. ALL ELECTRICAL WIRING [ ] SAND THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X56", IT IS NOT 1. ALL SITE WORK TO CONFORM TO THE LATEST TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND ELBOWS USED WITH PVC CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC, AL CONDUIT INSTALLED ABOVE FINISHED GRADE 0'~ (TURNING UP) TO SCALE. PLANNING BOARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. "DIG-SAFE" OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AND LEGALLY AND COMMERCIALLY SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED BY PREVAILING CODE. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, A [ .... 71 WOOD CONTINUOUS ACCEPTABLE UTILITY LOCATOR SERVICE, IN ORDER TO VERIFY THE UTILITY 'MARK-OUT' SHALL BE DONE TO LOCATE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PHOTOGRAPHS FOR ALL ELECTRICAL WIRING 2. 'DEWATER' ALL TRENCHES AS REQUIRED DURING INSTALLATION OF ALL LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN AREAS OF WORK. PUNCHLIST PURPOSES SHALL BE TAKEN OF ALL UNDERGROUND WORK PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. ~ (TURNING DOWN) [' *1 WOOD BLOCKING SITE FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS TO ENSURE PROPER DEPTH AND PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MEANS OF PROTECTION OF SAID EXISTING UTILITIES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK. COORDIBIATE ALL 3, INDOOR (UNCLASSIFIED AREA): ALL FEEDERS SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN EMT. ALL BRANCH [~ DISCONNECT SWITCH CENTER LINE [-I ~ ~-~-~A STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONCRETE. REQUIRED RELOCATION WORK WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY PROVIIDER. CIRCUITS SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN EMT. 15 AND 20 AMPERE 1-POLE LIGHTING CIRCUITS, OR MISCELLANEOUS BRANCH CIRCUITS CONCEALED ABOVE SUSPENDED CEILINGS OR WITHIN DRYWALL PARTITIONS SHALL (~ EAST MARION FIRE B. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH APPROVED WORKING DRAWINGS RECEPTACLE PROPERTY LINE AND REQUIREMENT SHEETS. NO DEVIATION WILL BE PERMI%ED EXCEPT 8. ALL WASTE MATERIAL, INCLUDING RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, ET'C., CONSIST OF TYPE MC METAL-CLAD CABLE, IF PERMITTED BY CODE. CONNECTIONS TO COMMUNICATION CABINETS BY WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD. SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR, AND SHALL BE AND VIBRATING EQUIPMENT SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT, MAXIMUM 3 ~ ~-~ STEPPED FOOTING DEPARTMENT A 9245 MAIN ROAD COMPACTION UNDER STRUCTURES, BUILDING SLABS, STEPS, PAVEMENTS, REMOVED FROM THE SITE, FEET IN LENGTH. MINIMUM EMT SIZE TO BE 3/4-INCH. , REVISION OW-- GROUND WIRE EAST MARION, NY 11959 AND WALKWAYS SHALL BE 95%. 9. CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE THE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE IDURINO 4. OUTDOOR OR INDOOR (CLASSIFIED 'DAMP' OR 'WET' LOCATION}: ALL FEEDERS AND BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL (~_ COAXIAL CABLE 4. MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, ASTM D-1557. COMPACTION UNDER LAWNS OR CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DIURING CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN POS CONDUIT, CONNECTIONS TO COMMUNICATION CABINET AND VIBRATING GRID REFERENCE IN UNPAVED AREAS: 85% MAXLMUM DRY DENSITY, ASTM D-1557, CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL EQUIPMENT SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN LiQUID-TIGHT FLEXIBLE STEEL CONDUIT, MAXIMUM 5 FEET~ × × CHAIN LINK FENCE SHEET TITLE GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. IN LENGTH. /IDET~ -u----~ ~ STOCKADE FENCE 5. ALL ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED~ DETAIL REFERENCE NOTES, UNDERGROUND. 10. ALL CONCRETE USED FOR ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE ~ c- FENCE AIR-ENTRAINED, AND SHALL ACHIEVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE ABBREVIATIONS & 6. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO TONE PATH OF EXISTING CABLE AND STRENGTH OF 4,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS.% A~ GUARD RAIL SYMBOLS PROVIDE MARK-OUTS. HAND-EXCAVATE NEAR ANY UNDERGROUND --.W ~ WATER MAIN PIPES, UTILITIES, OR STRUCTURES. 11. IF EXISTING GRAVEL BEDDING IS REMOVED, STOCKPILE AND RES;PREAD # ELEVATION AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK. RESTORE LANDSC:APE ---O/H- FILTER FABRIC AS WELL. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AS REQUIRED. OHW- OVERHEAD WIRES SHEET NUMBER SUBMITTALS REV 6 11-12-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMR REV 5 10-26-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMII REV 4 09-25-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMI REV 3 09-14 OC~ REV. FOR BLDG. PERMIT REV 2 09-02 O~c FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV 1 08-28-0~c FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV A 08-18-0~c FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV 0 OZ 22-0~c CONSTRUCTION .... P UNDERGROUND POWER G N SECTIONS .... E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC & DETAILS .... T---- UNDERGROUND TELCO I / T-Mobile --' Northeast LLC cp, S'~ ¢. gO' ~: ~ ~ ~ O~T~E~ 11739 ¢ ~ ~ Cu~ ~ ~ he ~ SURLY OF PROPERTY MAXION TECHNOLOGY, lNG. /* ~ ~¢ SCALS' i"=30' ~Y STA~ ~Y STATE DESIGN, INC. Architect~ · Eng,neers /~ 241 Boston Post Rd, Wes~ Phone: 508 229-4100 ~ ~~'O ~~ MarLborough, MA. 01752 Fax: 508~485 5321 g % ENGINEER ~ sd ~ PROJECT NO: 2902.034 ~ DRAWN BY: SC , ~ gUB~ITTALS 66. S0,00'¢ o= ~ dCL S ~ REV 5 10-26 09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERME 5 . Ol~X .~ uW ,.0.. ~ R~ 4 09-25-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMI~ REV 2 09-02-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV 1 08-28-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT ~ ¢ ~ R~ 0 07-22-09 CONSTRUCTION ~ ~ ~ ~ +' THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, T-MOBILE NORTH~ST LLC, ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRI~EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR ~WFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 2C'X35", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE % LI 13-545A %~** ~¢. EAST MARION FIRE ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS g VIOLATION PECONIC SURVEYORS, P,C, ~ST MARION, NY 1 1939 ~F SECTION 7809 DF THE NE~ YORK STATE EDUCATION LA~, (~31) 7~5 - 50~0 FAX (~3J> 7~5-i797 EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7BOg-SUBDJV[SZDN ~, ALL CERTIFICATIONS SgI~ NgP UR COPIES BEAR THE [NPRESSED SEAL DF THE SURVEYOR iD30 TRAVELER STREET 02--251 AREA=3.0583 ACRESw~sr SJSNATURE APPEgRS HEREHN, S~UTH~LD; N,Y, 11971 SHEET TITLE PROPERTY SURVEY SCAILE:PROPER~": ;0' SURVEY ~ o~15' 30' 60' SHEET NUMBER SCALE: 1" = 30' C ~ I I 186'+ PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST 25'-3'x12'-0' LEASE AREA EXISTING MONOPOLE EXISTING AT&T- COMPOUND EXISTING 1-STY. &~ 2-STY. FIRE STATION ~-40 TING PAD y/..~ EXISTING PAVED PARKING LOT EXISTING 1-SLY, - FIRE STATION .j//-APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NORTH EXISTING PROPERTY LiNE -- EXISTING CONCRETE PAD T-MOBILE NORTHEAST SHALL HAV~ 2~.- HOUR/7-DAYS -A-WEEK VEHIICULAR ACCESS TO SITE VIA ROAD AND FIRE DEPAI~q~IENI' DRNE I I APPROXIMATE EDGE OF- '~ ~ EXISTING TREELINE ~ '~ 03 EXISTING ' ~ 't,J~ [N\~' ~'0~ ~ ~ ~ liE P~N o ~s, ~o,~o' ~ PROPOSED ~'-0# GATE~ PROPOSED T-MOBILE~ ~ PRO~SED T-MOBI~ ~ ~ .o~ co.c~,~ I I C~N UNK ~NCE x PROPOSED OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED NORll-IF.~ ICE BRIDGE 25'-3' 22'-0' I X--X X X PROPOSED 7/8"e CABLES (IYP. OF ~ PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 12), RUN ON TRAPEZE UNDER PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE LX X X X--X PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORll-lEAS'r COAX TO ENTER FLAGPOLE VIA EXISTING PORT HOLE PROPOSED T-MOBILE NOR'THEAST ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE ID(ISTING FLAGPOLE (TYP. OF 1 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF -PROPOSED (2) BTS OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINIETS WiTH BOOSTERS X X--X X X--X X--X X--X X X'~FROPOSED GPS ANTENINA MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ICE BRIIDGE POST Jl NORTH PPC( UNDERGROUND POWER/"~'~ & ]ELCO CONDUIT RUN IN ~ PROPOSED UTII.I1Y TRENCH ~ FOR PROPOSED VEGETATIVE SCREENING AROUND COMPOUND, SEE COMPOUND LANDSCAPE..-~--x PLAN ON SHEll A-2 PROPOSED BBU CABINET /-EXISTING AT&T /EQUIPMENT AREA X-- X X/ X X × X X --X EXISTING A/~T ICE BRIDGE X X EXISTING ICE ~ ~ ~ + EXISTING 6'-HIGH AT&T <~ ~ \\ ~ PERIMETER FENCE r~ ~ \~'+~EXISTING GATE ~ ~'~- IEXISTING 52"x26" (CONCRETE PAD J /-.pROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST /MEieR IN EXISI1NG SPARE SLOT BELOW AT&T I~C.l~.R ON EXISllNG H-FRAME I/- EXISTING TRANSFORMER ~EXISTING FIBER TOWER ION CONCRETE PAD ~.M, EN, T~,, LAYOUT PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0 2'-0" ~'-0" 8'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO iMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF AhqY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE EXISTING StITE CONDITIONS AND THAT WHICH ARE REPIRESENTED HERE. IREFER TO LATEST RFDSll FOR ANTENNA/COAX INFORMATION T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203 GREAT R1VEP~ Ny 11739 MA)crON TECHNOLOGY, INC, BAY STAT~ ENGINEER 2902.054 I DRAWN BY: sc I K.W./K.B. SUBMITTALS REV. FOR BLDG. REV. FOR BLDG. PER 39-25-0 REV. FOR BLDG. REV. FOR BLDG. 09-02-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT FOR BUILDING PERMIT 08-18-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 07-22-09 CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN. PROPERLY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY DUPUCATION OR USE W~THOUT EXPRESS WRIIIEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE LI 15-545A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11959 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN & EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NUMBER A I PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LEASE- AREA = 280:1: SQ. FT. (12'-0'x25'-3') PROPOSED 6'-HIGH T-MOBILE~ NORTHEAST COMPOUNO FENCE x /~' // ~ PROPOSED VE~ET^TIVE SCREENING AROUND / 8 '~ NORTHF..~ EQUIPMENT AREA TO BE PROVIDED BY T-MOBILE [- ~ NORTHEAST - (28) EASTERN RED CEDAR TREES (MIN. 10 '~ FEET TALL) ('TYPO 4' O.C.. (2) ROWS STARGSRED, -~' BETWEEN ROWS, MIN. OF 3' OUTSIDE PROPOSED COMPOUND FENCE x x x EXISTING 6'-HIGH AT~T COMPOUND FENCE EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT AREA - !flu PROPOS.D ,CE .RIOOE , EXISTING 110'-HIOHJ ~ FLAG MONOPOLE AT&T 5'-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER (FROM ClNGULAR (AT,~T) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS DATED 3/30/2007) (TYP. ON NORTH, EAST & WEST SIDES OF AT&T COMPOUND) PROPOSED VEGETATIVE SCREENING AROUND AT&'[ EQUIPMENT AREA TO BE PROVIDED BY AT&T PER ClNGULAR (AT&T) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS .DATED :'./:~0/2007 - (12) EASTERN RED CEDAR TREES (MIN. 10 FEET TALL) ('rYP.) EXISTING AT&T ICE BRIDGE u -EXISTING ICE BRIDGE X L-x~ \ \ COMPOUND LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/&"=1'-0" ~ (MIN.) 3'-0' (WP.) Om.) II 0 2'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND THAT WHICH ARE REPRESENTED HERE. T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE BWY., SUITE D-203 GP~EAT RIVER, NY 11739 MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, INC. BAY STATE DF. SIGN BAY STATE DESIGN, INC. Architects · Engineers 241 Boston Pos[ Rd. West Phone: 508-229-4100 Marlborough, MA. 01752 Fax: 508-485-5521 ENGINEER I PROJECT NO: 2902.034 Ii DRAWN BY: SC CHECKED BY: K.W./K.B. I SUBMITTALS REV 6 11-12-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMB REV 5 10-26-09 REV, FOR BLDG. PERMn REV 4 09-25-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMI] REV 3 09-14-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMI1 REV 2 09-02-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV 1 08-28-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV A 08-18-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV 0 07-22-09 CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPER~f AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DUPUCATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATNE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE LI 15-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SHEET TITLE COMPOUND LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER A ? ¢//~EXISTING IO'-HIGH FIRE REFER TO LATEST RFDS T Mobil DEPARTMENT WHIP ANTENNA FOR ANTENNA/COAX - e N ORUAT ON Northeast LLC 3500 S~SE HWY., SIJ1TE D-203 TOP OF EXISTING FLAG MONOPOLE/~, NOTE: GREAT PdVER, NY' 11739 CONTRACTOR TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIP' THE __ ~ OF EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS ~ ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN i ELEV.: 107'-0" ~: AGL ~r2 THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND THAT WHICH ARE REPRESENTED HERE. MA~ON TECHNOLOGY, lNG, ~Y STA~ ~ OF FUTURE ANTENNAS ~ .... ELEV.: 97'-0" · AGL BAY STATE DESIGN, INC. 241 Boston Post Rd. West Phon~: 508-229-~I00 Marlborough, MA, 01752 Fox: 508-~85-532' ~ PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTH~ST ~NNAS~ /mTOP OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTH~S~ A~TENNAS ~ MOUNTED INSIDE EXISTING F~B MONOPOLE% / ~ / ...... EL~.: 89-' ~ AGL~ (~P. OF 1 PER SE~OR, TOT~ OF 3). ~', / ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTH~ST ANTENNAS ~ EL~.: 87-0 · AGL~ m ~PROPOSED 7/8"¢ COAX (WP. OF 4 PER ~ ~EXISTING 110'-HIGH F~G MONOPOLE [~! ~ IENGINEER PROJECT NO: 2902,0~4 I DRAWN BY: SC I CHECKED BY: K.W,/K,B. SUBMITTALS ' I R~ 6 11-12-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMIT R~ 5 10-26-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMI~ REV 4 09-25 09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMD REV 5 09-14-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMll REV 2 09-02 09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV 1 08-28-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT R~ A 08-18-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT R~ 0 07-22-09 CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPER~ AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF Ii~ AGENCIEsT MOBILE FoRNORTH~STTHE PURPOsEsLLC' ANYoF DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRI~EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, ~ DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT ~ OF EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT WHIP ANTENNAS. i - CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED ~ ~ .... ELEV.: 50'-0" ~ AGL ~ REGU~TORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED, IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. CA ).cst EAST MARION FIRE ~ PROPOSED UMTS OUTDOOR. ~ / FPROPOSED (12) CO~ TO RUN I PROPOSED T MOBILE NORTHmT CO~ TO DEPARTMENT92~5 MAiN ROAD ,A-~, EQUIPMENT CABIN~.. / ,UNDER PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE I'"' ' ~ EAST MARION. NY 11959 ~ k ~ / IoN PROPOSED ~APEZE ER F~GPOLE VIA ~I~ING PORT HOLE PROPOSED (2) B~ OUTDOOR EQUIPMENTm ~ ~ / / PROPOSED 8"-HIGH T-MOBILEm ~ IMETER FENCE SHEET TITLE ~ PROPOSED 'PC ~ ~.~ ~ ..~ ,~ , I , , PROPOSED VEG~AT~E SCREENIN8 AROUND AT~T EQUlPMENTAR~TO BE ~ " , .. . .~ ~PROVIDEB BY AT~T PER ClUOU~R (AT&T) CONSTRUOnON D~WINGS BATED ( A29 [ AZ& ) PROPOSED T-MOB LE NORTH~ '" ? ( ' ' / W, ~z2,~ ~ ( I SOUTHWEST ELEVATION A ~A-2~A-4~OEBAR TREES (MlU. 10 FE~ TALL) ~P.) 4' 0.O., (2) ROWS ~AeeEREB, 3 ~ , ~ -~ I, I,[ I &, [~l v ~ B~EEN ROWS, MIN. OF 3 OUTSIDE PROPOSED COMPOUND FENCE ~ ~JI ~ BRACKET (TYP.) FRONT VIEW .SIDE VIEW -I 133" BOTTOM VIEW ANTENNA TECHNICAL FEATURES \NTENNA MAKE · MODEL RFS APX16BWV-16BWVS E-A2( DIMENSIONS B x W x B (IN,) 55,9" x 135" x 525" WEIGHT (EXCL. MOUNTING HDWR,) (LB.) 40,7 WEIGHT w/MOUNTING HARDWARE (LB.) - SURVIVAL WlNB SPEED (M/HR) 125 FRONTAL THRUST (MAX. @ 160KM/N) 177 RADIATING ELEMENT MATERIAL BRASS RADOME MATERIAL FIBERGLASS MOUNTING HARDWARE APM40-2 + APM40-E2 CONNECTOR ~YPE (4) 7/16 DIN FEMALE o~ RF CONNECTORS VIEW ANTENNA DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. MOUNTING POLE CAP MOUNTING POLE MOUNTING BRACKET (~YP,) TO BE PLACED AS NEEDEB FLANGE 30" FLANGE -1 1/16" DIA, HOLE (WP. OF 6) //2" DIA. HOLE (TYP. OF 6) ANTENNA MOUNTING SCALE: N.T,S. POLE o 1/,~" DIA. HOLE (TYP, OF 4) DETAIL PIPE MOUNT ANTENNA MOUNTING KIT PER MANUFACTURE'S SPECS ANTENNA DOWN-TILT BRACKET ANTENNA (SEE pLANS AND RF SCHEDULE) ANTENNA MOUNTING KIT PER MANUFACTURB'S SPECS ANTENNA ANTENNA DOWN-TILT BRACKET OPOSED PIPE MOUNT ~OPOSED UNIVERSAL ADAPTER KIT 91554 BY VALMONT OR EQUAL SECTION A-A II POST CAP U-BOLT (TYP) /4x0'-10" LG (LLV) /8"¢ BOLT (TYP) LO STANDARD PIPE OUBLE NUTS & WASHERS /4 (4) 1/2"¢ HILTI KWIK BOLT Ill OR APPROVED EQUAL (MINIMUM ~ EMBEDMENT OF 3 1/2") TOP OF (E) CONCRETE PAD lB STO, BASE PL LEVELING PL (OPTIONAL) 3/~-'' MIN. NON-SHRINK GROUT GRIP STRUT HOLES @ /2"¢ THREADED ROD (1' 8" LO) COAX CABLE W/ BUTI ERFLY CLIPS DETAIL ~'A" 1" (TYP) ~ . SECTION ~ 2 1/2" STD. GALV, PiPE ~6"xG"x5/8" 1/2"¢ BOLTS HPS 1 LIGHT% FIXTURE A%rACH ED %, TO GALVANIZED STEEL POLE, TOP OF LIGHT FIXTURE LOCKWASHER CAP WITH 7/8 THREADED HOLE GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE MAST TO BE WELDED TO GALVANIZED STEEL BASE PLATE ~/2" s/s ROD CHEMICAL ANCHOR, EMBEDMENT (WP.) SLAB OR PAD LIGHT FIXTURE WITH PIPE MAST DETAIL ANTENNA SCALE: NTS SCALE: N.T,S. MOUNTING DETAIL NOTE: LIGHT FIXTURE TO BE WEATHER-PROOF NEMA 250W MOTION-SENSOR 3R SWITCH BOX 11/2" S/S ROD SET IN- HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHOR, MIN. 3-1/2" EMBEDMENT (TYP,) f/8" ~ GALVANIZED '~. STEEL BASE pLATE PLAN VIEW GPS CONNECTOR (P/N: NTL379AA 1-375 Fr.) · 3"¢ STD, PIPE LIGHTNINO PROTECTION GPS ANTENNA SCALE, N,T.S. -RFS AWS TWIN TMA, MODEL ATMAA1412D- 1A20 qQTBO1MA GPS ANTENNA MALE TNC CABLE TO ANTENNA MAST TO ANTENNA COUPLER NUT D ETA I L 18"¢ -N TYPE CONNECTOR TO EQUIPMENT CABINET /-5000 PSI CONCRETE PIER NOTES: 1. ALL STEEL SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. ALL BOLTS TO BE FURNISHED WITH LOCK WASHERS AND NUTS, 2, SEE DETAIL "A" FOR MOUNTING ICE BRIDGE TO CONCRETE PAD. S, 5000 PSi COMMERCIAL "QUIK-CRETE" MAY BE USED FOR PIERS, ICE BRIDGE DETAIL SCALE: N,T.S. DECIDUOUS TREE EVERGREEN TREE -PRUNE BRANCHES & FOLIAGE BY 1/5 WHILE RETAINING NATURAL SHAPE OF TREE. PRUNE ALL DEAD AND BROKEN BRANCHES, 1/2" REINF. RUBBER HOSES TO ENCASE WIRES WRAP TREE FREE WRAP FROM ROOT CROWN UP TO SECOND LOWEST MAIN BRANCH (DECIDUOUS TREES ONLY) DEPTH VARIES ~ FINISH- GRADE UNTIE & FOLD BURLAP 1/5 BALL HEIGHT, SYNTHETIC OR TREATED BURLAP SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED. NOTES: 1. 2"X 8'-0" STAKES WIRE W/TWISTED ENDS BARK MULCH TEMP 3" CONTINUOUS EARTH SAUCER 6" MIN. MIXTURE MIN, SOiL UNDER ROOT BALL STAKES MIN. 1'-0" INTO SUBSOIL LOOSEN HARD SUBSOIL AT BASE OF HOLE LANDSCAPE TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 10'-0" IN HEIGHT WHEN PLANTED. SPECIES PROPOS;EO TO BE EASTERN RED CEDAR (JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA). TMA DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. VEGETATIVE SCREENING TREE PLANTING & PRUNINGQ SCALE: N.T,S,' T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE ItVVY., SIJITE D-203 GREAT Pd~CE R, NY 11739 M- XTON MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, INC. BAY STATE DF, SIGN SAY STATE DESIGN, INC, Architects · Engineers 241 Boston Post Rd, West Fhone: 508-229-4100 Marlborough, MA, 01752 Fox' 508-485-5321 ENGINEER I PROJECT NO: 2902.034I I DRAWN BY: scI SUBMITTALS 11-12-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMIT 0 26-09 REV. FOR BLDO, PERMIT D§ 25-09 REV. FOR BLDG, PERMIT 09-14-09 REV. FOR BLDO, PERMIT 09-02-09 FOR BUILBINO PERMIT 08-28-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT D8-18-09 FOR BUILBING PERMIT 07-22-09 CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONBUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X56", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11959 SHEET TITLE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SHEET NUMBER A PROPOSED NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT CABINET /\ SUB-BASE / \ (WITH COVER) '1 CABINETS, (2) NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT CABINETS, SUPPLIED BY T MOBILE NORTHEAST, AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR, REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION, SPECIFICATIONS' HEIGHT. 75-1/8" WIDTH: 5S" DEPTH, 27-1/2" CELL CAPACITY: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT WEIGHT 1212 LBS. ELECTRIC REQUIRED: 230V to 240V PLAN VIEW PLAN - SUB-BASE ~OPOSED NORTEL S12000~ EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED TO SECURE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT SUB-BASE: BOLT TO PROPOSED 8"-THICK REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE PAD ON GRADE WITH 1/2" S/S RODS SET IN HILTI NIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS, MIN. 3 1/2" EMBEDMENT (TYP.) (SEE DETAIL 4, SHT, A-4) DOSED SUB-BASE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (TYPO FRONT VIEW 'A' NORTEL S-12000 ETS EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. SIDE VIEW 'B' CABINET, (1) ERICSSON RES 5106 WCDMA MACRO OUTDOOR BASE STATION CABINET, SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR, REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. SPECIFICATIONS~ HEIGHT: WIDTH: DEPTH: CELL CAPACITY: WEIGHT: ELECTRIC REQUIRED, 64" 51" 1-12 CELL-CARRIERS PER CABINET 1874 LBS. FULLY EQUIPPED (3X4 CONFIGURATION, 200 Ah BATFERY) 208-250 VAC (1 PHASE), 100 433 VAC (2-3 PHASE) PROPOSED ERICSSON RES 5106 WCDMA MACRO OUTDOOR BASE STATION CABINET COMPACT G RAVEL PLAN VIEW WELDED WiRE FABRIC © CENTER OF SLAB / / PLAN VIEW '1 GRADE CONCRETE SCALE: N,T,S, FRONT CROSS-SECTION PAD DETAIL TO SECURE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET SUB-BASE: BOLT TO PROPOSED 8"-THICK REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE PAD ON GRADE WITH 1/2" S/S RODS SET IN HILTI NY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS, B 1/2" EMBEDMENT (TYP.) (SEE DETAIL 4, SHT. A-4) -PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (TYP.) VIEW 'A' ERICSSON RES 3106 BASE STATION CABINET SCALE: N,T,S, MIN. SIDE UMTS D ETAI L 0 VIEW 'B' E) ,1'-11 II II ~(~y× / II / PLAN 1_'-5 1/2]! VIEW :, ~'- PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (TYP,) -I SIDE VIEW 'B' ROOSTER CABINET ,FRONT VIEW 'A' BOOSTER SCALE: N.T,S, TO SECURE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET SUB-BASE: BOLT TO PROPOSED 8"-THICK REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE PAD ON WITH 1/2" S/S RODS SET IN H[LTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS, MIN. 3 1/2" EMBEDMENT (~P.) (SEE DETAIL 4, SHT, A-4) SIDE VIEW 'C' CABINET DETAIL o' n" r-SCREENED LOUVRES FOR ~ ~ -~ - /TELCO COMPARTMENT PROPOSED %f I~ PC BOX ~ , I I. PLAN VIEW PLAN - MOUNTING 2'-o" BRACKET TEMPLATE PROPOSED MAGNETEK PLAN VIEW GENERATOR INLET 12BWAC GFI CONVENIENCE OUTLET ERICSSON OVER/UNDER POWER% PROTECTION CABINET (PPC)~ TO SECURE EQUIPMENT CABINET SUB-BASE: BOLT TO pROPOSED 8"-THICK REINFORCED POURED CONCRIETE PAD ON GRADE WITH 1/2'" S/S RODS SET IN HILTI HIT NY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS, MIN, 5 1/2" EMBEDMENT (~(P.) (SEE DETAIL 4, SHT. 200 AMP GENERATOR 120VAC GFI PROTECTED~ CONVENIENCE OUTLET ERICSSON OVER/UNDER PROTECTION CABINET (PPC) SCREENED LOUVRES TELCO COMPARTMENT pROPOSED PPC BRACKET (ORDER SEPARATELY) IROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (~/P.) FRONT VIEW 'A' SIDE VIEW 'B' ERICSSON PPC BOX DETAIL Q SCALE: N.T.S. ) FRONT VIEW 'A' UNIT MOUNTED FRONT DOOR PROPOSED MABNETEK SPECTRUM SERIES MPE5566 BATrERY BACKUP ENCLOSURE PVC SLEEVE w/#2 SOLID- TINNED GROUND WIRE TO NORTEL GROUND BAR PLAN OOO OOOj 000 OOO ;ED ENCLOSURE TO SECURE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET SUB BASE: BOLT TO PROPOSED 8" THICK REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE PAD ON GRADE WITH 1/2" S/S RODS SET IN HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS, MIN. B 1/2" EMBEDMENT (TYpO (SEE DETAIL 4, SHT A-4) MAGN ETEK BATTERY SCALE: N,T.S. SIDE SPECTRUM MPE5566 BACKUP ENCLOSURE Q ViEW 'Bt ROB TELCO CONDUIT WITH (1) 6 PAIR BELDEN CABLE PER CABINET PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT w/SEAL-TIGHT CONDUIT TO ELECTRICAL PANEL ~T CONDUIT AREA INDICATES NORTEL S-12000 EQUIPMENT CABINET SET ATOP SUB-BASE HOLE FOR MOUNTING SUB-BASE TO STEEL DUNNAGE OR CONCRETE PAD. FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S SPECS AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES. LOCATION OF ACCESS COVER CABLE (I~P.) -PANEL ACCESS ACCESS COVER (DOE) 000 000 PLAN 8- B/4-" CABLE ACCESS I*· I /-PANEL (~P.) OOO! ~ 000 .ELEVATION 'A' ELEVATION 'B' ETS SUB-BASE DETAIL Q SCALE: N,T.S. ROWS ALUMINIZED ANGLE BARBED WIRE 45' ON ALL SIDES (TYP.) SITE (TYP. OF 5) 10'-0" O,C. (TYP.) GATE FRAME 2"¢ SCH. 40 1/2"¢ NPS TOP BRACE SCH. 40 (TYP.) :3"¢ NPS CORNER POST (P(P.) FENCE FABRIC TO BE FLUSH WiTH TOP OF FINISHED GRADE MIN, 4 FASTENERS (HOG' RINGS) PER 2 1/2"¢z NPS LINE POST 2 1/2"¢ NPS LINE POST CONCI FOUNDATION 10"¢x56" (TYP,) TENSION WIRE SINGLE-GATE CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL SCALE: N.T S LOCK/GATE ~USS ROD GALV. MESH #9 CA. FABRIC /DATE HOLD BACK LOCATED 1 FI. OFF FACE -FINISH GRADE T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE I-IWY., SUI'IE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, BAY STATE 241 Boston Post Rd, West Phone: 508-229-4100 Marlborough, MA. 01752 Fax: 508-485-5321 ENGINEER I PROJECT NO: I DRAWN BY: I CHECKED BY: 2902.034 SC K.W/K.8. SUBMITTALS I I I 11 12-09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMIT 10 26-09 REV. FOR BLDG PERM 09-25 09 REV. FOR BLDG. PERMIT REV. FOR BLDG. PER 09-02-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 08 28-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 08-18 O! FOR BUILDING PERMIT 07-22-09 CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11939 SHEET TITLE EQUIPMENT & CONSTRUCTION D ETA ILS SHEET NUMBER A 5 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE SECTOR ALPHA CENTER BETA CENTER GAMMA CENTER ANTENNA MARK A-1 B-1 G-1 ANTENNA RFS APX16DWV 16DWVS-E-A20 (55 90"Hx15.330"WxB.15"D) RFS APX16DWV-16DWVS-E-A20 (55.90"Hx1B.50"WxB.15"D) RFS APX16DWV-16DWVS-E-A20 (55.§O"Hx133,330"Wx3.15"D) AZIMUTH (DEGREES 330 150 270 DOWN TILT M DOWN TILT E RAD CTR. (Fr. A.G.L) 87' 87' 67' COAX SIZE (IN.) COAX CABLE COLOR CODE RED, GREEN RED, RED, OREEN RED, ORANOE RED, RED, ORANGE 7/8" WHITE, GREEN WHITE, WHITE, GREEN WHITE, ORANGE WHITE, WHITE, ORANGE BLUE, gREEN BLUE, BLUE, GREEN BLUE, ORANGE BLUE, BLUE, ORANGE RFDS WORKSHEET: XX/XX/2009 COAX LENGTH TMA (Fr.)* RFS AWE TWIN ATMAA1412D- 1A20 1335 RFS AWS PNIN ATMAA1412D- 1A2B RFS AWS TWIN ATMAA1412D-lA20 155 RFS AWS TWIN ATMAA1412D- 1A20 RFS AWS TWIN ATMAA1412D- 1A20 155 RFS AWS TWIN ATMAA 1 41 2D- 1A20 ANTENNA & CABLE SCHEDULE0 SCALE: NJ,S, REFER TO LATEST RFDS FOR ANTENNA/COAX INFORMATION BILL OF MATERIALS NO, QTY. DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER PART # 1 5 ANTENNA RFS APX16DWV-16DWVS-E-A20 2 6 TMA RFS ATMAA1412D-1A20 3 1 CPS ANTENNA NAIS VIC-lO0 4 1 BAT-ERY BACK UP ENCLOSURE MAGNETEK SPECTRUM MPE5566 5 2 ETS CABINET NORTEL S-12000 6 2 BOOSTER CABINET CCI - 7 / UMTS CABINET ERICSSON PBS 3106 8 1 PPC CABINET - - 9 7/8"¢ GROUND KITS CABLEWAVE - 10 24 WEATHERPROOFING KITS (2 PER COAX) CABLEWAVE - 11 12 DIN(M)-DIN(M) 1/2"¢ - 8'-0" SUPERFLEX JUMPERS CABLEWAVE 12 12 DIN(M)-DIN(M) 1/2"¢ - 6,_0" JUMPERS CABLEWAVE - 133 24 7/8"¢ DIN(F) CONNECTORS (2 PER COAX) CABLEWAVE - BILL OF MATERIALS SCALE. N,T.S. MINIMUM CABLE BENDING RADIUS RADIUS WEIGHT O.D, CABLE (IN,) PER FT. (IN.) 1/2" CABLE SUPERFLEX (FSJ-4-5OB) 1 1/4" 0,14 LB. 0.52" ~1/2" CABLE (LDF-4 5OB) 5" 0.15 LB. 0.65" 7/8" CABLE (LDF-5-5OA) 10" 0.3333 LB. 1.09" 1/4" CABLE (LDF-6-5OA) 15" 065 LB, 1.55" 5/8" CABLE (LDF-7 50A) 20" 0,82 LB. 1.98" CABLE SIZES/LENGTHS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: FOR SECTORS O' - 100' - USE 7/8"¢ CABLE FOR SECTORS 101' - 150' - USE 1-1/4"¢ CABLE FOR SECTORS 151' & ABOVE USE 1-5/8"¢ CABLE MINIMUM CABLE BENDING RADIUS CHART SCALE: N.T.S. POLE ANTENNA GENERAL ANTENNA INSTALLATION NOTES 1. ALL INDICATIONS CF NORTH ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IN FIELD TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO SECTOR ANTENNA INSTALLATION. 2, CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATIONS BASED ON THESE pLANS AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR ORDERING CABLE. ALL CABLE LENGTHS MUST BE VERIFIED IN FIELD. 5 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BRASS TAGS (SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE NORTHEAST) AT EACH END OF ALL ANTENNA CABLES, DENOTING THE NUMBER OF TAPE-MARKING BANDS AND THE COLOR OF TAPE-MARKING BANDS. 4, ANTENNA CABLES WILL BE COLOR-CODED AT THE ANTENNA, FILTER INJECTION CABINET, JUMPER CONNECTIONS, AND THE ETS CABINET, 5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL DRIP LOOPS ON ALL ANTENNA AND JUMPER CABLES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL CABLE SUPPORTS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SPACING OF 33'-0" ON CENTER, 7, THE CONTRACTOR WILL RECORD THE LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBERS OF ALL ANTENNAS, ANTENNA CONTROLLER MOTORS, AND THEIR CORRESPONDINC INSTALLED LOCATION AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 8, ALL ANDREW MOTORS ARE GENDER-SPECIFIC, AND WILL BE WIRED STARTING WITH THE MALE END OF THE CABLE AT THE ETS, AND CONTINUE ALONG THE RUN, FOLLOWING THE 'FEMALE UP' RULE. 33' 0" STD. //~JUMPERS COAXIAL CABLES B'-O" SUPERFLEX JUMPERS TYPICAL CABLE SECTOR ROUTING SCALE: N.T.S, D ETAI L f-1/2" SUPERFLEX SECTOR 'A' D[NDIN (M)(F) /:MPER (TYP,) 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP. FOR SECTOR 'A') DIN (F) /-1/2" JUMPER (~'P.) DIN (F) DIN tM) 1/2" SUPERFLEX JUMPER (TYP.) SECTOR 'B' 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP, FOR SECTOR 'B') DIN (F) ~ 1/2" JUMPER (TYP.) DIN (F) DIN I-- 1 1/2" SUPERFLEX MPER (~(P.) SECTOR 'G' 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP, FOR SECTOR 'G') DIN (F) /-1/2" JUMPER (TYP.) /-1/2" SUPERFLEX DIN (F) /JUMPER (TYP,) DIN tM) .SECTOR 'A' 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP. FOR SECTOR 'A') DIN (F) /-1/2" JUMPER (TYP.) /-1/2" SUPERFLEX DIN (F) / JUMPER (TYP) DIN tM) SECTOR 'B' 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP, FOR SECTOR 'B') DIN (F) /-1/2" JUMPER (TYP,) rl/2" SUPERFLEX S__ECTOR_ '_~_' DIN (F) /-1/2" JUMPER (TYp,) DINDIN (M)(F) /JUMPER (TYP.) 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP. IFOR SECTOR 'G') DN (M) j ~1/2" SUPERFLEX DIN (F) /JUMPER (TYP.) SECTOR 'A' DIN (F) 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP. FOR SECTOR 'A') DIN tM) -1/2" JUMPER (TYP.) [] [] SECTOR 'B' 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP. FOR SECTOR 'B') SECTOR 'G' 7/8"¢ CABLE (TYP, FOR SECTOR 'G') ANTENNA SCALE: N.T.S. ROUTING SCHEMATIC LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED FUTURE T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 S[JNRISE I~¢Y., SlJl'lJ~ D-203 Gl{EAT RIVER, NY 11739 I XTON MAX'TON TECHNOLOGY, INC. BAY STATE 'r~Y, SI6N BAY STATE DESIGN, INC Architects · Engineers 241 Baston Post Rd West Phone: 508-229-4100 ENGINEER I1 PROJECT NO: 2902.03411 DRAWN BY: $C I CHECKED BY', K.W,/K.B. I SUBMITTALS REV 6 11 12 09 REV. FOR BLDG PERMIT REV 5 10-26-09 REV. FOR BLDG, PERMIT REV 4 09-25-09 REV. FOR BLDG, PERMIT REV .3 09-14-09 REV. FOR BLDC, PERMIT REV 2 09-02-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV 1 08-28-09 FOR BOILDING PERMIT REV A 08 18-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT REV 0 07-22-09 CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESIGN. PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRI~FEN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE, SITE LI 13-345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 1193339 SHEET TITLE ANTENNA & CABLE SCHEDULE, BiLL OF MATERIALS, & ROUTIN6 SCHEMATIC SHEET NUMBER A-Co T-Mobile AN,ENNA rth LLC ANTENNA----_ ,..No east TOWER/MONOPO 1, MAXIMUM VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN CABLE I Ill ] GROUNDING KITS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 FEET, INSTALL 3500 S~E H~¢¢~., SfJl'l.P. D-203 ANTENNA ~ ADDITIONAL KITS AS REQUIRED BY FIELD CONDITIONS. GREAT RIVI~R, ~ 11739 UPPER EGB BONDED~TO (E) SERVICE TOWER/MONOPOLE 1~--~2/0D, ' /I//_ 'XTON ~.----~'TI I / ] INSULATED GREEN / 40V, 1¢, UTILITY METER MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, INC. #2Gj II [/// MDB (CADWELD DOWN ./~ DSM CABLE GROUNDING KIT / /--2 IIF n //~LEADS AND CONNECT CE BRDGE/CABLE ~ ..... ~ -g/ 6 CABLE OPTION/ / / DESIGN 'TRAV ,.,. ,BOND.NG,UMPEBB -- __ rECBATBTSRL.. ./ / II I~ N ~~ ~FCM, MOUNTED / / FBBU CABIN~ ~ -- ~ -- 12V EXTERNAL LOWER EGB BONDED TO~ I [ ~PCAL % ~ ~ / ,~ ~ PROPOSED TOWER/MONOPOLE W/~2 0 I /I % / % ~ / ~ -- ~ mnA_o= I ~ DSM 241 8oston Post Rd. West Phone: 508 229-4106 ~30" MIN. g ~2G~ % ~ ~~ %-EGB AT BBU PLINTH BUI¢-IN 50A-2P ~(') ~6 & (1)~SG IN l"O '106 G zb -~ EGB AT TELCO PLINTH GENE~TOR I ~ I - UMTS ~-- G ~. ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ G RECEPTACLE ~BIN~ I I . -'~ ~/o~ ~ / -- k ~ / t~goi u. EBOePtNgPosTsaU~PERw. E. FENcETO CO,N~,~SI ~I - / /" "~ / ~ ~ ~ WITHIN 6' OF EQUIPMENT PAP I I ( ~ ~ ~' 60A-2P ~(3) ¢6 & (1) ¢8G IN 1"0 g . / / -T -/ / I X ~STEEL GROUNDING ELECTRODE - - T' - // ~2GJ / / I % ~P, OF ~. (QUA~I~ AS REQUIRED) L J GROUNDING CONNECTION GROUNDING CONNECTION -- PER NEC ONE LINE DIAGRAM GROUNDING RISER DIAGRAM ~ SCALE: N.T.S. SCALE: N,T.S. ENGINEER I PROJECT NO: 2902.0341 I DRAWN BY: scI I CHECKED BY: T.A.V./K.B. SUBMITTALS / 2, ALL UTIL~ RUNS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH T-MOBILE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND REV 2 09-02-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT (E) 600A, 1¢, 120/240V,~ ~ ~(3)~1,,C ~6, 1 ~BG, --(P) BBU RESPECTIVE UTIL~ COMPANIES. UTILI~ COMPANY TO ASSESS THE CAPACI~ OF THE EXISTING REV 1 08-28-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT OABIN~ 600A, 1¢, 120/240V SERVICE TO ACCOMMODATE AN ADDmONAL 200A, 120/240V, 1¢, REQUIRED BANKx FOR THE T-MOBILE CELLU~R SITE. REV A 08-18-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT SE~ICE w/ 5-M~ER ~ I & UTILI~ SERVICES SHOWN ARE PROPOSED, THE ELECTRICAL CON.ACTOR SH~L COORDINATE REV 0 07 22-09 CONSTRUCTION ~ EXACT TELEPHONE AND ELEOTRIC SE~IOE OONNEOTIONS POINTS, ROUTING, ASSOOIATED ~ ~ ' REQUIREME~ A~D BACKCHARGES WITH LOCAL UTILI~ COMPANIES, ~ PPG THIS DOCUMENT IS THE CREATION, DESION, 4. PROPOSED EXPOSED GROUNDING RUNS TO EXISTING OR PROPOSED GROUND SY~EM PROPER~ AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF ~ ~ ~~ EXCEEDING 18" O~R IN HIGH T~FFIC AR~S SHOULD BE RUN IN 1/2" - 3/4" PVC T-MOBILE NORTH~ST LLC. ANY 9 ~ ~ S~LTITE-CORE FLEX CONDUIT (OR THE APPROVED EQUAL ) AND SHALL BE S~LED WITH DUPLICATION OR USE WLTHOUT EXPRESS ~ -- SILICONE S~NT. WRI~EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, BBU DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT ~ ~ ~ AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF -- ) CONDUCTING THEIR ~WFULLY AUTHOR[ZED ~ ~ ~ TELCO REGU~TORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE -- ~ FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED. IF B ~ -- I THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT CONDUIT 10 NEC D E PARTM E NT 9245 MAIN ROAD ~LCO - ~" SCH ~0, W/ PICAL AT ~CH ~ST MARION, NY 11959 SERVICEGROUND PER N~ON PULL ROPE TRANSITION NEC 5' SOH 40 ~C SHE~ TITLE ONE-LINE AND GROUNDING RISER DIAGRAMS, AND GROUNDING NOTES POWER RISER DIAGRAM ~ SHEET ANTENNA MOUNT GROUN£ COAX CABLE GROUNDING KITS UGBKIT2 INSULATED COPPER GROUND BAR MOUNTING BRACKETS (4) s/a"-~l×l''~ HHCS BO~S & LOCK WASHERS #2 AWG SOLID OR STRANDED COPPER WIRE, BONDED TO GROUND BAR. ROUTE IN DOWNWARD DIRECTION TO GROUNDING RING (LOWER EOB) 0 0 SOLID #2 TINNED GROUNDING CONDUCTORS. GROUND SOURCES INCLUDE COAXIAL CABLES, ELECTRICAL, ETC, RADIUS (MIN.) o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~BTS & ANTENNA GROUND BAR(S) MAIN GROUNDING CONDUCTOR(S) NOTES: 1. ADDITIONAL CONNECTIONS TO THE GROUND BAR ARE NOT SHOWN IN THIS DETAIL. 2. GROUND BAR ASSEMBLY AS MANUFACTURED BY NEWTON INSTRUMENTS CO., lNG, OR EQUAL. 5. FOR TWO-HOLE LUGS WITH SPACING OTHER THAN THE PRE-DRILLED, CONTRACTOR SHALL DRILL THE BAR IN THE FIELD. FULL-SIZE BOLTS SHALL BE USED TO ATTACH LUGS TO THE GROUND BAR. T~_OTE' DETAIL DEPICTS GENERAL GROUNDING METHODOLOGY FOR TYPICAL ANTENNA INSTALLATIONS. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFC ANTENNA MOUNTING, PANEL ANTENNA (SEE ANTENNA SCHEDULE, SHT __) ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE AND RELATED MOUNTING HARDWARE 1/2" COAXIA' COAXIAL GROUND KIT (COK)~ STANDARD BARREL ~,~ HYDRAULICALLY-COMPRESSED LUG CONNECTION (PANBUIT CATALOG #LEAN 6-G-L) GROUND LEAD TO ~ MAA~TER GROUND B (MOB) #2 AWO SOLID TINNED EOF WIRE FROM SADB TO WTGB SECTOR ANTENNA GROUND (SAOB) - ONE BAR PER SECTOR STANDARD BARREL HYDRAULICALLY-COMPRESSED LUG CONNECTION (PANDUIT CATALOG #LEAN 2-14-Q) ANTENNA GROUNDING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. ~.~JUMPER FROM ANTENNA COAXIAL BETWEEN ANTENNA AND BTS JUMPERS COAXIAL CABLES #6 AWG STRANDED GREEN TBWN INSULATED COPPER WIRE FROM COK TO SECTOR ANTENNA GROUND BAR (SAGB) #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE FROM ANTENNA MOUNT TO SAGB - CAB-WELD TO MOUNT (TYP.: 'OMPT') EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR (EGB) SCALE: N.T.S WEATHERPROOFING- KIT (TAPE, BUTYL & SCOTCH COT? CABLE (TYP.) (TYP.) 4PER CABLE (TYP.) LAYER) CABLEWAVE GROUND KIT (TYP.) OROUNE WLRE TO BE CRIMPED TO #2 SOLID NOTE 1 TAPE (SEE NOTE 5) TINNED GROUND WIRE TO GROUND BAR JUMPER CABLE FROM BTS NOTE: D~OT INSTALL GROUND KIT AT A BEND, AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO CIGBE. J CABLE GROUNDING KIT (CGK) DETAIL SCALE: N,T.S. STAINLESS HARDWARE TWO' COMPRESSION TERMINAL CLEAR HEAT-SHRINK INSULATION EXTENDING 1/4" OVER LUG AND 2" OVER CABLE INSULATION GROUNDING CABLE (5 LAYERS EACH OF 1~,, & -~" WIDTHS) (SEE NOTE 5) STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 5 STEP 4 SHOULD BE TAPED FROM THE BOTTOM UP TO MOVE WATER AWAY FROM CABLE CONNECTION. ALL CABLE CONNECTIONS TO BE WATERPROOFED AS ILLUSTRATED WITH ELECTRICAL TAPE (STEP 2), VAPOR SEAL (BUTYL TAPE) (STEP 5), SIX LAYERS OF ELECTRICAL TAPE (SEE NOTE 5), AND SCOTCH COAT. THE FINAL LAYERS OF ELECTRICAL TAPE (STEP 4) SHALL BE THREE LAYERS OF 1 1/2-INCH TAPE AND THREE LAYERS OF 5/4" TAPE. ALL TAPE TO BE WRAPPED WITH A MINIMUM OF 50% OVERLAP. COAT ENTIRE CONNECTION WITH BM SCOTCH COAT, BUTYL TAPE IS ALSO CALLED MASTIC OR TAFFY TAPE. ANTENNA CABLE WATERPROOFING DETAIL GROUND BAR FLAT WASHE'R, 5/8"x l~r" HEX EXPOSED BARE TO BE KEPT TO ABISOLUTE MINIMUM, NO INSLILATION ALLOWED WlTP~IN THE COMPRESSION TERMINAL (IhfPICAL), GROUNDING CABLE COAXIAL CABLE BETWEEN ANTENNA AND BTS JUMPERS NOTES 1. VEREICAL CONNECTIONS 2. 4. 5. SCALE: N.T.S, SECTION A-A TYPICAL GROUND BAR CONNECTIONS ELEVATION WASHER, TYP. WASHER, TYP. -- lUT, TYP. SCALE: N.T.S. BAR V E R T NOTE: 1. "DOUBLING UP" OR "STACKING" OF CONNECTION IS NOT PERMITTED. 2. OXIDE INHIBITING COMPOUND TO BE USED AT ALL LOCATIONS. .3, CADWELD DOWNLEABS FROM UPPER EGB, LOWER EOB, AND MGR. FROM EOB (WHEN SHOWN ON GROUNDING RISER DIAGRAM) SPARES~)--~'~'~ TO GROUND[NG~ -CADWELD DETAIL Q CADWELD TO GROUND RING AT GROUND ROD ANDREW UGB KIT OR EQUAL WITH HOLE PATTERN AND STANDOFF INSULATORS AND MOUNTING BRACKETS AS SHOWN GROUND RING AT GROUND moo MASTER GROUND BAR (MGB) Q SCALE: N.T.S. GRADE~ ~I~ZI~ FROST LINE N~ /-- CADWELD · GROUND RiNG #2 AWG TINNED BCW C MIN. 12" DEPTH OF / INSPECTION HAND HOLE, CRUSHED STONE OR EQUAL / HARDER #560 P-42 WITH #10 PS COVER OR APPROVED EQUAL. EXOTHEBMIC CONNECTION DD GROUND RING -- #2 AWG BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR TEST LOOP EXTENSION -- 5/8" DIA. x 10'-0" LONG COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD GROUND WELL DETAIL SCALE: NTS LOAM AREA PAVED AREA FINISH GRADE COURSES OF 1-1/2" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ML YELLOW WARNING TAPE "HIGH VOLTAGE" STRAIGHT EVEN EDGE BEFORE PAVING BURIED SCALE: NTS GRAVEL BASE PACTED BACKFILL :ACTED PROCESSED GRAVEL, 4" MIN. ON ALL SIDES 5" PVC SCHEDULE 40, I1, 0,,I CONDUITS FOR NEW ~- · UTILITY SERVICES CONDUIT DETAIL GROUNDING NOTES 1. ALL GROUNDING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST RECENT REQUIREMENTS OF N,E,C. ARTICLES 250 AND 810 AND WITH OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS' STANDARDS, ALL DETAILS ARE SHOWN IN GENERAL TERMS. ACTUAL GROUNDING INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY DUE TO SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. IT IS NOT THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO DEPICT EVERY PIECE OF EQUIPMENT AND DETAIL, BUT RATHER TO SHOW SYSTEMS TO BE INSTALLED. PROVIDE SYSTEMS WITH ALL APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT AND/OR COMPONENTS, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT, TO MAKE A COMPLETE, OPERATIONAL SYSTEM, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CRITERIA SET FORTH. RESISTANCE 10 GROUND SHALL BE 10 OHMS OR LESS, MAX. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY A GROUNDING EVALUATION COMPANY, SUCH AS D~H DEVELOPMENT (515-461-2969) OR EQUAL. NOTIFY OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER IF THERE ARE ANY SITE SOIL/RESISTANCE CONDITIONS THAT MAY PRECLUDE OR HAMPER A PROPER AND COMPLIANT GROUNDING SYSTEM INSTALLATION. GROUNDING ARRANGEMENT SHALL BE TESTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED CRITERIA. SUBMIT AN INDEPENDENT FALL OF POTENTIAL TEST REPORT. SHOULD THE CRITERIA NOT BE NET, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL ENHANCEMENT WITH THE OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH ENHANCEMENT WORK. FOR GROUNDING OF PRE-FABRICATED EQUIPMENT CABIN,TS, SEE CABINET MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 5, SEE GROUNDING SCHEMATIC FOR ANTENNA GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS. ALL CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE MADE TO RARE METAL. THOROUGHLY PREPARE CONTACT SURFACES TO ENSURE A PROPER CONNECTION (I.E.,FILE PAINTED AREAS). PROVIDE COATING OF AN ANTIOXIDANT (NO-OX, OR EQUAL) ON CONTACT SURFACES OF ALL CONNECTIONS. ALL BELOW-GROUND CONNECTIONS AND EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS TO EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CAD WELDED AND SPRAYED WlTHCOLD-GALVANIZED PAINT. ABOVE-GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CAD-WELDED, GROUND LUG, OR COMPRESSION FI~ED. FOR GROUND LUG, USE STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE CONSISTING OF TWO HOLE. LONG-BARREL LUGS WITH A LOCK WASHER THAT SHALL BE PLACED ON THE NUT. ALL METAL OBJECTS WITHIN 6 FEET SHALL BE GROUNDED BACK TO THE EQUIPMENT GROUND RING WITH #2 AWG INSULATED SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE. ALL BENDS, CURVES, AND CONDUCTOR SPLICES SHALL BE TOWARDS THE GROUND LOCATION (GROUNDED END) OF THE CONDUCTOR, AND SHALL MEET OR EXCEED MINIMUM BENDING RADII. GROUNDING CONDUCTORS #6 AND LARGER SHALL RAVE A MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS OF 12 INCHES; GROUNDING CONDUCTORS #6 AND SMALLER SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS OF 8 INCHES. 9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE: A. BETWEEN EXTERIOR ITEMS AND BARS, AND FROM SECTOR ANTENNA GROUND BARS TO TOWER GROUND BAR: #2 SOLID, TINNED, COPPER WIRE; B. BETWEEN GROUND KITS AND BARS: #5 STRANDED GREEN THWN INSULATED COPPER WIRE; C. FROM SECTOR CABLE GROUND BARS TO GROUND RINGS, AND FROM CABINET GROUND RARS TO GROUND RING: #2/0 SOLID, TINNED, COPPER WIRE. D. ALL CONNECTIONS TO BE CAD-WELD TYPE. 10. GPS TRANSMISSION LINES SHALL HAVE AT LEAST (1) GROUND KIT INSTALLED AT THE WAVEOUIDE ENTRANCE PORT. 11. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY GROUNDING KLTS AND HARDWARE, AS REQUIRED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS. (COORDINATE WITH OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATLONS PROJECT MANAGER.) 12, ALL ANTENNA MOUNTING HARDWARE TO BE GROUNDED TO APPROPRIATE ANTENNA GROUND BARS. 13. ALL ABOVE-GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR TIGHTNESS AND CORROSION (6) MONTHS AFTER INSTALLATION AND EVERY (12) MONTHS THEREAFTER. 14. FOR DISSIMILAR METALS, USE CONDUCTORS WITH THE PROPER BIMETALLIC TRANSITION CONNECTOR BETWEEN THE TWO. 15. METALLIC CONDUIT SURROUNDING GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE GROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH N.E.C. ARTICLE 820-40(A)5. PROVIDE GROUND JUMPER FROM BONDING BUSHING TO NEAREST BAR, USING #2 WIRE AND OZ-OEDNEY TYPE HBLC BUSHINGS. FLEXIBLE LIGI CONDUIT (EXCEPT AT METER BASE, USE RGS) FINISHED GRADE -- RIGID STEEL CONDUIT PVC CONDUIT SIZE AS SHOWN ON LAYOUTS RIGID STEEL TO PVC ADAPTER NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF CONDUIT STUB-UP. CONDUIT STUB-UP SCALE: NTS T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SIJNR_ISE HWY., SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 II/[ XTON MAXTON TECHNOLOGY, INC. BAY STATE nF, SIGN 241 Boston Post Rd. West Phone: 508-229 4100 Morlborough, MA. 01752 Fox. 508-485-5321 ENGINEER Ii PROJECT NO: 29o2.o34I DRAWN BY: SCI I I CHECKED BY: T.A.V./K.B. ii SUBMITTALS 11-12-09 REV. FOR BLDG. 10-26-09 REV. FOR BLDG. 09-25-09 REV. FOR BLDG. REV. FOR BLDG. 39-02-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 38-28-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 38-18-09 FOR BUILDING PERMIT 37-22-09 CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT iS THE CREATION, DESIGN, PROPER~ AND COPYRIGHTED WORK OF T-MOBrLE NORTHEAST LLC. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRI~EN CONSENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, DUPLICATION AND USE BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THEIR LAWFULLY AUTHORIZED REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS IS SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED, IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 24"X36", IT IS NOT TO SCALE. SITE kl 13 345A EAST MARION FIRE DEPARTMENT 9245 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, NY 11959 SHEET TITLE ELECTRICAL & GROUNDING DETAILS SHEET NUMBER