Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6455
Pvt. Rd., Fishers Island #3047 /~...~. ! 10121/82 ,~;I construct accy. storage shed in the sideyard area. 10-60~3.1 & 14.1 BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio, Jr. Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ken Schneider Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVEI> ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ~.~ 3' CY'O TOWN OF SOUTHOLD '~ ' APh 25 20ll Tel. (631) 765-1809 ° Fax (631) 765-9064 X"b9 - , ...~ ~O~)~jj~ FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION ~O~_.~t~. L//ex~ MEETING OF APRIL 20, 2011 $outhold%l'own ¢!¢r' k ZBA FILE: 6455 NAME OF APPLICANT: Anne Bunting PROPERTY LOCATION: 2427 Isabella Beach Rd., Fishers Island, NY CTM: 1000-10-6-14.1 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated Feb. 25, 2011, stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP: This application has been reviewed under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The Applicant's property, is an irregular shaped 3.17 acre waterfront parcel in the R-120 Zone. The northerly lot line measures 582.24 feet along Isabella Beach Road. The north-easterly lot line measures 157.36 along adjacent property. The south-easterly lot line measures 353.68 feet along the shoreline of Block Island Sound, and the south-westerly lot line measures 474.75 feet along an adjacent property. The parcel is improved with a pre-existing, non-conforming single family dwelling, other substantial non-conforming structures located in close proximity to the top of the bluff including an above-ground pool, pool bath house, associated decking, and also a 12x12 foot shed located in a non-conforming side yard area, as shown on the site survey drawn by CME Engineering, Land Surveying & Architecture, PLLC, dated Jan. 31,2011. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Art. XXI1 Code Section 280~116A(1), Art. XXIII Section 280-14 and Art. III Section 280-15F and the Building Inspector's January 24, 2011 Notice of Disapproval based on a building permit application for additions & alterations to existing dwelling and construction of an accessory structure at; 1) at less than the code required setback of 100 feet from the top of bluff, 2) Accessory structure at less than the code required setback of 100 feet from the top of bluff, 3) less than the code required front yard setback of 60 feet, 4) accessory structure at less than the code required front yard setback of 60 feet on water front property. RELIEF REQUESTED: 1 .' The Applicant requests a variance to construct proposed alterations and additions to an existing, non-conforming single family dwelling which is located within 46 feet from the top of the bluff. This construction includes alterations to an existing porch, and the installation of a new stone terrace with a non-conforming setback to be located within 40 feet from the top of the bluff, whereas a 100 feet setback is required by Town Code. Page 2 -April 20, 2011 ZBA Fileg6455 - Bunting 2. The Applicant requests a variance to construct a proposed 121+/- sq. ft. pergola with a non-conforming setback of 26 feet from the top of the bluff, whereas a 100 feet setback is required. The Applicant does further propose to completely remove an existing pool, bath house, and all associated decks, that are located as close as 3 feet from the top of the bluff, grade the site to its natural contours, plant the disturbed area with native species plants and grasses, and then to also construct the new pergola within this vicinity. 3. The Applicant requests a variance to construct a proposed section of new deck with a setback of 46.5 feet from the front yard, whereas a setback of 60 feet is required by Town Code. 4. The Applicant requests a variance in proposing to detach an existing attached garage from the principle structure, by the removal of some structural walls, while leaving the garage structure in place, with a non- conforming front yard setback of 20 feet, whereas a 60 feet setback is required by Town Code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Applicant proposes to remove +/- 3000 feet of above-ground pool, associated bath house, and decking from an area of non-conforming setback from the top of the bluff. While the Applicant proposes to construct a new, small pergola on the site, with a non-conforming bluff setback, the Applicant also proposes to eliminate a large non-conforming structural complex, and restore the affected area to a more natural-like condition using guidelines developed in a comprehensive landscape plan developed specifically for this site. This Board requested a site inspection be conducted by the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District to address outstanding environmental concerns regarding the proposed construction within such close proximity to the top of the bluff. The Board is in receipt of a memorandum from that agency written after completion of the site inspection, and dated March 28, 2011 which details and recommends certain specific erosion and sediment control practices which should be implemented during and after construction on the property, including the development of a detailed Soil and Erosions Control Plan by a licensed professional, which the Board of Appeals requested from the applicant's architect/agent at the public hearing. On April 14, 2011 the Board received this plan by CME Engineering dated 4/12/2011 and a letter from Sam Fitzgerald Architect PC dated April 12, 2011 with an attached construction sequence and method dated April 12, 2011 prepared by BD Remodeling & Restoration. The property is subject to a prior Decision of the ZBA in Appeal #3047, dated Nov. 6, 1982, which granted a variance for a side yard location of a 12xl 2 tool shed. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application April 7, 2011, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, an assessment of the character of the neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(l). Grant of the variances for the proposed alterations and additions to the non- conforming single family dwelling, including the variance required for the proposed detached garage, and the variance granted through alternative relief for the proposed pergola will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The Applicant's parcel is a 3.17 acre lot in the R-120 Zone, and there are no neighbors adjacent to the waterfront side of the property. The one neighbor nearest to the proposed detached garage is located on a lot on the other side of Isabella Beach Road, and that property is screened from the road, and also from the Applicant's garage by a well-established evergreen hedgerow. Most of the Applicant's driveway and parking areas are also screened from the road by another evergreen hedgerow planted on the Applicant's lot line, along the border of Isabella Beach Road which separated these two properties. The pergola will be located no closer than 45 feet from the top of the bluff, will have no permanent foundation, and will not be visible from Isabella Beach Road, or the houses of any adjacent neighbors. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The pre-existing single family dwelling is located almost entirely in a non-conforming area in relation to proximity to the top of the bluff. Therefore any construction on the waterfront side of the property, including the installation of the proposed stone terrace requires a variance. Page 3 April 20, 2011 ZBA File#6455 - Bunting The pergola requires a variance for its location because a conforming setback from the bluff would place it in the applicant's front yard, which would not be in the area where the Applicant seeks a measure of solitude and the enjoyment of the water view. Because the pre-existing house has a non-conforming front yard setback, the proposed deck extension requires a variance, and the proposed accessory garage also requires a front yard setback variance, once it is detached from the principle structure, as proposed by the Applicant. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for the stone terrace is substantial since it is a 60% relief from Code requirement of a 100 feet setback from the top of the bluff. However, it will replace an existing wood deck at the same non-conforming setback. The variance granted through alternative relief for the pergola is substantial since it is a 55% relief from Code requirement of a 100 feet setback from the top of the bluff. However, the proposed pergola is a small (121 sq. fi.) partially open, light weight slructure designed to be set into the sloping grade to create a minimal visual presence on the site and it will replace a very large pool complex that is substantially closer to the bluff at 3 feet. The variance granted herein for the deck extension is substantial since it is a +22% relief from Code requirement of a 60 feet front yard setback. However it is only 92 sq. fi. and is located behind the accessory garage where it will have no visual or other adverse impacts. The variance granted herein for the detached garage is substantial since it is a +66% relief from Code requirement of a 60 feet front yard setback. However the accessory garage will continue to be located in it's present 20.59 fi. non-conforming setback and no change will be made to it's present appearance or function. In summary, the variances granted are substantial. However, the Board has also taken into consideration the Applicant's initiative to remove over 3000 sq. fi. of non- conforming structures from the property, and to restore much of the top of bluff area to a more natural condition by using environmentally sound practices and procedures on this site. 4. Town Law §267-b(3}(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The Applicant has submitted a detailed Soil and Erosion Control Plan, as requested by the Board, which also addresses the concerns and recommendations stated in the information obtained by the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District upon completion of their site inspection. 5. Town Law §267-bO)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created to the degree that the Applicant was aware of the non-conforming aspects of all of the pre-existing structures, and the Applicant has nevertheless chosen to seek to alter and construct non-conforming structures on this site. 6. Town Law §267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new terrace, pergola, deck extension, and detached garage, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Homing, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT., the variances as applied for, for alterations and construction on the single family dwelling, and for the detached garage; as shown on the site survey drawn by CME Engineering, Land Surveying & Architecture, PLLC, dated Jan. 31, 2011 revised 4/12/2011 and the architectural plans by Sam Fitzgerald, Architect, PC, labeled "Application to the Town if Southold Board of Appeals/Table of Contents, and pages 1-13 (undated) stamped received in the ZBA on February 8, 2011; and DENY~ the request for a pergola location of 26 feet from the top of the bluff, and GRANT~ alternative relief of a 45 foot setback from the top of the bluff for the proposed pergola. CONDITIONS: 1. Storm runoff from the garage roof will be diverted by gutters and leaders into drywells adequate to contain such flow. Page 4 - April 20, 2011 ZBA Fi1¢#6455 - Bunting CTM: 1000-10-6-14.1 2. The Applicant shall comply with the Soil and Erosion Control Plan they submitted dated CME Engineering dated 4/12/2011 and a letter from Sam Fitzgerald Architect PC dated April 12, 2011 with an attached construction sequence and method dated April 12, 2011 prepared by BD Remodeling & Restoration to minimize land disturbance during construction and removal of the pool complex, and to maintain the integrity of the top of the bluff 3. This applicant's landscape plan will incorporate the erosion and sediment control recommendations issued by the Soil and Water Conservation District, and that are described in their memorandum dated March 28, 2011. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued Before applying for a building permit, the applicant or agent must submit to the Board of Appeals for approval and filing, two sets of the final site plan, conforming to the alternative relief granted herein. The ZBA will forward one set of approved, stamped drawings to the Building Department. Failure to follow this procedure may result in the delay or denial of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves thc right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Homing, Goehringer, Weisman (Chairperson), Dinizio, Schneider. Th's Re tion was duly ad ted (5 -OI. Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 7- /201l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.' DEVELOPMENT 6,o~ ' PAVED PAVED APPROX~ FILTER = 16 MIN. 1.) THIS SURV WAS PREPARED FOR THE PARTIES AND -/ .~/ 6 IN GROUND 2.) IT IS A VIO~TION OF THE STATE EDUCATION ~W FOR ANY PERSPECTIVE VI~ s,) ONLY ?PES OF THIS SURV. UA.KED WITH THE .......................... ~ 4.) COORD'NATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM U.S* COAST SPACING) WITH FILTER CLOTH MIN. OF 6 IN GROUN~ AREAS WHERE SEED RATE PER MIX APPLIES SEEDING MIXTURES By WEIGHT 1000 Sq. FT. SEEOINO DATES GRASSED AREAS RED FESCUES 70% 2 LB, APRIL 1 - JUNE 15 KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 20% or PERENNIAL R'r~ GRASS 10% AUG, 14 - OCT, 15 GRASSED SWALE, CREEPING RED FESCUE 45% 1,5 LB. APRIL 1 - JUNE 15 STORMWATER BASIN REDTOP 10% or & FOREBAY TALL FESCUE 45% AUC. 14 - SEP, 30 OR SMOOTH BRDMEGRABS ~EMPORARY SEEDING ANNUAL RYE GRASS 1,5 LB. MARCH 15 - JUNE 15 OR PERENNIAL RYE GRASS AUG. 15 - OCT, 15 WHERE TREES ABE TO 8E RETAINED, ME SEED MIXTURE SHOULD BE ADAPTED FOR SHADY CONDITIONS, SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL FABRIC ON SLOPES IS ENCOURAGED TO HELP ESTABLISH GOOD VEGETATIVE COVER AND REDUCE EROSION. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS LINE OF SILT FENCE. MAINTAIN SEE DETAIL. P~NT 1G ~E(WID X 170 rr.(LONC) OF EXISTII G LAWN AREA WITH ~ 'c~ LITTLE BLUESTEM R BROOMSEDGE TO TOP OF BLUFF-/I I PROVIDE ADDED BUFFER AT HAZARD LINE I~' ~ ROCKY BEACH TOE OF 3LUFF'-/1 WATER -10.00 ¢ STO.£ O~ PROPOSED PORCH 0+00 0+50 1 +00 1 +50 2+00 ~CR£¢N~O m*v~L AND PERGOLA QUALITY CONTROL CERTIFICATION GROUP REVIEWED CROSS SECTION HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SCALE; 1"=20' / / FINAL MAP REVIEWED BY ZB A SEE DE¢!tbN #' EXISTING BUILDING 6' p~ ~T ~ ~C~&~ TO REMAIN CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1, WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES, POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER ~T" OR "U" TYPE OR HARDWOOD, 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WiRE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION, FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. 3, WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER-LApPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, MIRAFI IOOX, STABILNKA T140N~ OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. ¢. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE OEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE, EXISTING BUILDING TO Be DEMOLISHED PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONS C/Of SAM FITZGERALD, ARCHITECT PC P,O. BOX 4-47 FISHERS ISLAND, NY 06390 PHONE #(860) 287-3808 11.) ALL BEMOLITION MATERIALS TO BE REMOVEB FROM SITE, DRAINAGE CALCULA~ONS - MAIN HOUSE ROOF AREA = 2,178 BF REQUIRED = 2,178 SF X 1,0 X 2/12 = 363 CF 363 CF / 50.27 CF/VF = 7,22 VF USE TWO(2) - 8'¢ X 4' DEEP DRY WELLS. DRAINAGE OALCULA~ONS - GARAge ~ ROOF AREA = 751SF REQUIRED = 751 SF X 1.0 X 2/12 = 125.17 CF 125A7 CF / 50.27 CF/VF = 2.5 VF USE ONE(l) - 8'¢ X 4-' DEEP DRY WELL. FF ELEV SF X 35,8 0 0 NOW OR FORMERLY FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SQUARE FEET EXlSTINO CONTOURS EXISTINO BRUSHLINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING WOOD RETAINING WALL PROPOSED SILT FENCE STONE WALL DATE: JAN, 31, 2011 SCALE: 1" = 50' SHEET 1 OF 1 DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD BE SEEDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER ACTIVITIES ARE FINISHED OR IF RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 Tele. No. (631) 734-6807 Fax No. (631) 734-5651 E-mail: LarkandFolts~aol.com May 9, 2011 Ms. Vicki Toth Southold Town Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Anne R. Bunting Appeal %6455 Dear Ms. Toth: Pursuant to the Findings, Deliberations and Determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of April 20, 2011, I am enclosing for the Board's approval six prints of the Site Plan Prepared For Anne R. Bunting by CME Engineering, last revised 04/26/2011, showing an additional buffer (10 ft.) along the top of the bluff and the proposed pergola to 45 feet from the bluff line. If there are any other requests of the Board or information that you need, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ~chard F. Lark RFL/bd Enclosures LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 2878~ MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 Tele. No. (631) 734-6807 Fax No. (631) 734-5651 E-mai[: LarkandFolts@aol.com RECEIVED APR 1 4 ~ ~1 I)0ARD OF APPEAI~ RICHARDF. LARK MARYLOUFOLTS Ms. Vicki Toth Southold Town Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 April 14, 2011 RE: Anne R. Bunting Appeal #6455 Dear Ms. Toth: Per the request of the Board I am enclosing seven copies of the following: 1. E-mail letter dated April 12, 2011 from Richard H. Strouse to Sam Fitzgerald. 2. Letter dated April 12, 2011 from Richard H. Strouse to Richard Lark, Esq. Letter dated April 12, 2011 from Sam Fitzgerald to Leslie Kanes Weisman with attached Construction Sequence and Method for Bunting Residence dated April 12, 2011. Site Plan Prepared For Anne R. Bunting by CME Engineering amended 04/12/2011 showing relocated silt fence detail and planting schedule. It is my understanding Ms. Weigand has agreed to eliminate the placing of hay bails on the property. If there are any other requests of the Board or information that you need, do not hesitate to contact me· Very truly yours, RFL/bd Enclosures Bunting From: Richard Strouse <rstrouse~cmeengineering.com> To: Sam Fitzgerald <sam~BDDesignusa.com> . .. Cc: larkandfolts~aol.com Subject: Bunting Date: Tue, Apr 12, 2011 2:03 pm Page 1 of 1 ~,ECElVED ~ ,/~""~" APR 14 011 .. BOARD OF APPEALS I have talked to Polly, have the plans revised and ready to send. How many to Sam? What address? How many to Dick Lark? Anyone else get direct copies? Sam- I will send a pdf. shortly so you can see what we show on the revised plan.- ]. Moved silt fence to 10 feet from the top of the bluff (per sketch provided). 2. Added 3 ft. wide additional grass plantings along top of bluff (between southerly boundary and existing deck. 3. Note to remove by hand decking within 10 feet of bluff and establish silt fence pdor to ground disturbance. 4. Added planting schedule. 5. Revised silt fence detail. I discussed the need for hay bales in addition to the silt fence with Polly and we agreed that because installing hay bales would require an additional ground disturbance to "set them in" we decided to use only silt fence. Silt fence requires a 6" disturbance instead of a 2 ft. disturbance. Call or e-mail with any questions. Richard H. Strouae, P.E., L.S. Director of Private and Commemial Development CME Associates, Inc. 32 Crabtme Lane P. O. Box 849 Woodstock, CT 06281 Tel: 888-291-3227 Fax: 860-928-7846 htm://mMl.nnl:e~m/qq~;40-111/anl-1/e.n-n~/mail/PHntMe~aae.a.~nx 4/14/2011 CME Associates Engineering, Land S~ue.ying & Architecture, PLLC 32 Crabtree Lane, PO Box 849, Woodstock CT o628~ Phone: 860.928.7848 Fax: 860.928.7846 ~ECE]~VED APR 1 4 20H Apfill2,2011 GOARD OF APPEALS Richard Lark, Esq. Lark&Folts Esqs. 28785M~n Road Cu~hogue, NYl1935 Re: Buntingr Fishers Island Dear Dick: I have incorporated comments from the Soil Conservation Service into our site plan and enclosed are 12 copies for your use. In discussions with Polly we decided that hay bales would not be required in addition to the silt fence. Hay bales require a greater disturbance during installation and would not be necessary. Please contact me/ff you have any questions. Richard H. Strouse, P.E., L.S. Director of Private and Commercial Development Cc: Sam Fitzgerald 12 April 2011 ~ECEIVED APR 1 4 ZOll ~OARD OF APPEALS Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 RE: Soils & Water Conservation Report ZBA File Ref. No. 6455 Bunting Residence 2427 Isabella Beach Road Fishers Island, NY 06390 Dear Ms. Weisman, We have received the report from Polly Weigand, Soils District Technician from the Soil and Water Conservation District regarding the proposed activity at the above referenced property. Please know that the recommendations in Ms. Weigand's report have been incorporated into the accompanying Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by CME Engineering (dated 1/31/11 and updated 4/12/11). The engineer, Richard Stmuse, has spoken to Ms. Weigand on the phone and has reviewed all of the recommendations with her to. ensure that his plan is comprehensive and complete. To supplement the plan, I have asked the contractor, BD Remodeling & Restoration, to provide a description of the construction sequences and methods for the various areas of demolition and new construction. This report is enclosed. Sincerely, SAM FITZGERALD ARCHITECT, PC Sam Fitzgerald, AIA Principal Fishers Island, NY (631) 788-7919 ~RECEZVED APR 2011 ~OARD OF APPEALS April 12, 2011 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND METHOD FOR BUNTING RESIDENCE Demolition of the Pool Structure Construction access from the street will be from the north side of the pool faucture, to the east of the existing pool shed. Step 1: All of the existing wood deck boards will be removed and disposed of by hand. Step 2: The wooden substructure of the pool deck will be removed with a mini- excavator with rubber tracks. The material will be disposed of by hand. The mini-excavator will only be positioned in areas of previously- disturbed earth, not on the lawn. Step 3: The swimming pool itself wili be removed and disposed of with the mini- excavator. Step 4: Retaining wall along bluff side: grade will be equalized on the back (north) side of the retaining wall. Step 5: Retaining wall will be removed and disposed of by hand. Demolition of Wood Deck and Construction of Bluestone Terrace: Construction access from the street will be from the north, coming around the west side of the house. No machines will be allowed on the existing lawn. Step 1: The existing wood deck will be cut up by hand and removed by hand. Step 2: A mini-excavator will be used to dig the trench for the new terrace foundation wall. The mini-excavator will only be positioned in areas of previously-disturbed earth, not on the lawn. Excavated earth will be piled up inside the foundation or removed by hand to the front (street side) of the house to a stockpile area. Step 3: Footing and foundation walls will be poured. A concrete pump truck will be parked on the north side of the house, and concrete will be pumped around the house to the area of the new terrace through a 4" hose. Step 4: Structural fill will be added to the area within the foundation walls. This will be done by hand. Step 5: A new concrete slab will be poured (pumped in from the front as in Step 3), and new bluestone pavers will be installed on top. Construction of Pergola No machines will be used for the construction of the pergola. The pergola will be made using "pole constxuodon," meaning the five poles, or posts, that make up the comers of the pergola will be sunk into the ground and serve as the footings and foundation. The post holes will be dug manually, 42" deep. The rest of the pergola will be constructed by hand. ~,OARD OF APPEALS Creation of Detached Garage and Deck Extension Construction access from the street will be from the north side of the house. Step 1: The portion of the existing house that connects the main body of the house with the garage will be removed and disposed of by a mini-excavator with robber ~acks. The mini-excavator will be positioned on the street side of the house only. Step 2: Ail of the existing wood deck boards will be removed and disposed of by hand. Step 3: Holes for new deck piers, 42" deep, will be dug by hand. Step 4: Concrete piers will be poured by the same method as mentioned above. Step 5: New deck and breezeway to be constructed by hand. / / / / /// / / / / / / / / / / / WELLR ' " EBH /ii UNE ~ BE LOT 14.1 ~') ~ AR~ = 2.79~ ACRES .," LISA K, HOWLETT I EROSION UNE (s~ I,,.AP REFEBENC£ No.4) SIRUCIURES' PLANT 3 FT. ORlOE) X 170 FT. (LONG) OF EX[SI1NG Mt'H Lrm. E BLUESTE~ OR BROOMSEI)GE TO PROVIDE ADDED 8bEEt~ AT IHE TOP OF I~.UFF PANB. AREAS WHERE SEED RATE PER MIX APPLIES SEEDING MIXTUREB BY WEight lOOO SO, F% SEEDING DATES GRASSED AREAS RED FESCUES 70% 2 LB. APRIL 1 - JUNE lB KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 20% or PERENNIAL RYE CRASS 10% AUG, 14 - OCT. 15 GRASSED SWALE, CREEPING RED FESCUE 45% 1.5 LB. APRIL 1 - JUNE 15 STORMWATER BASIN REDTOP ~0% or & FOREBAY TALL FESCUE 45~ AUG. 14 - SEP, 30 WHERE TREES ARE TO BE RETAINED, THE SEED MIXTURE SHOULD BE ADAPTEO FOR SHADY CONDITIONS, DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD BE SEEDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER ACTIVITIES ARE FINISHED OR IF THEY WILL BE LEFT INACBVE FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS TO PREVENT EROSION. THe USE OF SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL FABRIC ON SLOPES IS ENCOURAGED TO HELP ESTABLISH GOOD VEGETATIVE COVER AND REDUCE EROSION, PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS LINE OF Silt FENCE, MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT SEE DETAIL. 75 50 25 30 15 0 SO ONE-STORY P~GO~ / FT, O~ BLUFF - SET SILT FENCE FT. FRed BLUFF AND PRIOR TO DECK _=-- SOLRIUM DECK EX[STING I OF EXlSTl~ 9 LAWN AREA WITH LITTLE BLUESTEM 3RBROOMSEDGE TO J ~"-. Szn,. PROVIB ADDED DUFEERAT TOP OF BLUFF- COASTALHAzARDER(SIONJLiNE '-' TOE OF 3LUFE HIGH 0+00 0+50 1 +00 1 +50 2+00 QUALITY CONTROL CERTIFICATION GROUP HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=20' ~RIlON OF EXI~llNG TO BE DENOMSHED UNDER EXIS'i'INS ROOF / / / / / / / / / / / / /' // / / / / / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / / A.' / / / // /// / / ,/// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIR, 14 GAUGE W/ MAX, 6" MESH SPACING) 56" MIN, LENGTH FENCE DRWEN MIN. 16" LOCATION MaP SCALE 1"=400' 1,) SUBDIVISION pLAN PROPERTY OF ALICE S. STURGES; FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLO, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK; SCALE: 1"=1D0'; CHANDLER, PALMER & KING: NORWICH, CONN.; JULY 8, 1977 2.) SURVEY MAP PRoPerTY OF ALEXANDER GASTON; FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK: CHANDLER, PALMER ~' KING; NORWICH~ CT; SCALE: 1"=40 FEET; JULY 7~ 1995 5.) survEY MAP PROPERLY TO BE CONVEYED TO LISA K, hOWLETT BLOCK 42 FISHERS ISLAND, NY SCALE 1"=30' CML ENGINEERtNG, LAND SURVEYINO & ARCHITECTURE, PLLC FORMERLY CHANDLER, PALMER & KING 55 MAIN STREET SUITE 540 NORWICH, CT 06560 05-09-2005. // / // // iNTO GROUND OF 4g PHOTO No,35-8§1-85 DATED 08/29/88 PREPARED BY THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL // // ' m HEIGHT OF ,~'~ FILTER = 16" MIN, %) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PARTIES AND PURPOSE INDICATED HEREON, ANY EXTENSION OF THE USE BEYOND THE PURPOSED AGREED TO BETWEEN THE CLIENT AND A~/~ o"~./ EMBED F'J_TEE THE SURVEYOR EXCEEDS THE SCOPE OF THE ENGAGEMENT, ' CLOT~ ArMIN, OF %~ 6" IN GROUND 2.) IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. ~ 3,) ONLY COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MARKED WITH THE LAND · SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND AN ORIGINAL EMBOSSED OB INK SEAL ARE THE PRODUCT OF THE LAND SURVEYOR, WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN, 14 -- ~ 4,,) COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM U,S, COAST 1/2 GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" M :SH' AND GEODETIC SURVEY TRIANGULATION STATION "NIN" SPACING) WITH FILTER CLOTH ? 5.) BASE FOR LEVELS PER NGVD 1929, O'~ 38" MIN, FENCE POST ' ' UNDISTURBED ~o 6,) SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TAX MAP 1000, SECTION 010, BLOCK 6, LOT 14,1 AND SECTION 11~ BLOCK 1, LOT 7.5 ¢,) COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP, TOWN Of SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, SCALE 1"=200' SHEET 38-FI COMPACTED EMBED FILTER CLOTH MIN. OF 6" IN GROUND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS I, WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES~ POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER "T" OR "U" lYPE OR HARDWOOD, 2, FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION, FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING, 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL GE OVER-LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, MIRAFI IOOX~ STABILNKA T140R~ OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 4, PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE QEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 5, MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE, 7.) TOTAL AREA = 3.17:t: ACRES· 8.) SITE IS LOCATED IN R-120 ZONE, 9.) PERCENT OF LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED-2.5~ 10,) APPLICANT: ANNE R, BUNTING C/O! SAM FITZGERALD, ARCHITECT PC P,O. BOX ~47 FISHERS ISLAND, NY 06390 PHONE ~(860) 287-3808 1%) ALL DEMOLITION MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED FROM SITE. DRAINAGE CN_CULA'BON¢= -- MAIN HOU~i£ ROOF AREA = 2,178 SF REQUIRED = 2,178 SF X 1.0 X 2/12 = 363 CF .363 CF / 50.27 CF/VF = 7,22 VF USE TWO(2) - S'~ X 4' BEEP DRY WELLS, DRNNA~E CALCULATORS -- GARRY& BR~L:'V/A¥ ROOF AREA = 751 SF REQUIRED = 751 Sf x 1,0 X 2/12 = 125,17 CF 125,17 CF / 50,27 CF/VF = 2,5 VF USE ONE(l) - 8'¢ X 4`' DEEP DRY WELL. RECEIVED APR 1 4 2011 SOARDOFAPPEALS EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN EXISTING BUILDINg TO BE DEMOLISHED PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONS PROPOSED PORCH AND PERGOLA N/F rF ELEV SF X 35.8 NOW or FORMERLY FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SQUARE FEET EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING BRUSHLINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING WOOD RETAINING WALL PROPOSED SILT FENCE STONE WALL SCALE: 1" = 30' SHEET 1 OF1 Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) x~ Southold, NY 11971 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: From: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator AP~ 4 Z011 ~OARD OF APPEALS Date April 4,2011 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref. BUNTING #6455 SCTM# 1000-10.-6-14.1 and 11-1-7.5 Request for Variance from Art. XXII Code Section 280-116A(1), Art. XXlll Section 280-14 and Art. III Section 280-15F and the Building Inspector's January 24, 2011 Notice of Disapproval based on a building permit application for additions & alterations to existing dwelling and construction of an accessory structure at; 1 ) at less than the code required setback of 100 feet from the top of bluff, 2) Accessory structure at less than the code required setback of 100 feet from the top of bluff, 3) less than the code required front yard setback of 60 feet, 4) accessory structure at less than the code required front yard setback of 60 feet on water front property at: 2427 Isabella Beach Rd.,(adj. to Block Island Sound) Fishers Island, NY. SCTM#1000-10-6- 14.1 and 11- 1-7.5. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Jennifer Andaloro, Assistant Town Attorney i '~'~r'~/' SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE .[~EP^RTMENT OF PLANNING '~tO February 25,2011 Town of Southold ZBA PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Leslie K. Weisman, Chair THOMAS A. ISLES, A.I.C. P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING RECEIVED BOARD OF APPEALS Dear Ms. Weisman: Pursuant to the requirements o f Sections A 14-14 thru A 14-25 o f the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following applications submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission are to be a matter for local determination as them appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impacts. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Applicants Connolly, James North Fork Beach Condominiums Blackley, James & Kathleen Municipal File Numbers #6454' #6455 #6456 fl6458 TRK:ds Very truly yours, Thomas A. Isles Director of Planning Theodore R. Klein Senior Planner LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788~0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 Paul A. TeNycnhuis, CPF~C DISTRICT MANAGER Phone (631)727-2315 x3 FAX (631)727-3160 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 423 GRIYI~ING AVENUE SUfI'E 110 R1VERHEAD, NY 11901 RECEZVED APR 6 Z011 I~.RD OF APPEALS George Proios Phone (631) 698-7691 March 28, 2011 Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: ZBA File Ref No. 6455 (Bunting) Dear Chairperson Weisman, As requested, a site inspection was completed of the Bunting property, SC Tax Map # 1000-6-14.1 at 2427 Isabella Beach Road, Fishers Island to review the proposed removal of the pool, decking, portions of the main building and the installation of a bluestone-flagging patio and a pagoda. The following are the observations and recommendations reflective of the site visit. Observations: The house is sited on the top of a hill and the eastern and southern aspects are fully landscaped with well- established turf grass lawn, which slope directly towards Block Island Sound. Minute erosion appears to be recently occurring on the southwestern edge of the property near the pool. Active sheet and rill erosion is more evident at the Northeastern property boundary, just off the garage where a gutter and downspout discharge directly onto the ground. This concentrated flow, in combination with recent ground disturbance, is contributing to the erosion on this slope. With the exception of this location, the house appears to be fitted with gutters and downspouts that discharge into dry wells. A sizable in-ground pool is sited on the western side of the property. Around the house and pool, raised decking with weed fabric exists as documented on the site plan. It is expected that soil compaction is limited at this location and runoff from storm events infiltrates into ground under the raised decks. The landscaping has been established on the slopes through retaining walls and rock revetments; all of which are in stable condition. A one-foot buffer of Orchard grass runs along the entire top of the bluff with the exception of approximately fifteen feet adjacent to the sloped pool area. The lawn is serviced by a sprinkler irrigation system that is sited along the Office Hours: Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Friday 7:30 a.m. through 3 00 p.m. buffer at the top edge of the blul~. One sprinkler has tipped towards the'~luff and it sprinklers discharge water over the bluff face. is expected that all these The bluff is well vegetated and is in stable condition, as is the stairway leading to the beach. Landscaping debris has been deposited on the western side of the bluff and is smothering bluff vegetation at this location. RE¢I~IYEI~ Recommendations: /~¢~ 0 011 Erosion and bluff stability are the greatest concerns with the proposed demolition and r e co n s t ru c~t~i{~r~t$ this site due to the steep and undulating slopes. Currently, both the lawn and bluff areas have excellent vegetative cover which contributes to the stable condition of these slopes. In order to maintain this stability, it is imperative that the following practices be implemented to protect the sloping lawn and bluff from erosion and Block Island Sound from sediment loading. Erosion and Sediment Control: First, due to the amount of ground disturbance an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is recommended to be drafted and implemented for this site. This is important to ensure the appropriate siting and function of such practices as silt fencing and straw bales in order to reduce the erosion potential on the slope/bluff and the amount of sediment leaving the site. On the site plan, the straw bales and silt fencing are identified but are improperly sited and designed. Specifically, the sediment barriers are not contiguous, run down instead of across the slope, are too close to the top of the bluff to allow for natural infiltration, and the edge of the silt fencing is not installed completely below grade. The straw bales and silt fencing can be used together (with the silt fence installed upslope of the bales) and both should be sited at least ten feet away (or as far as practicable) from the top of the bluff to provide a naturalbuffer as straw bales and silt fencing serve only as sediment barriers, not water control structures. A ten foot vegetated buffer slows the runoff velocity encouraging infiltration and runoff cresting over the top of the bluff (a catalyst of bluff erosion). Such a buffer also reduces the degree of ground disturbance immediately atop of the bluff as the proper installation of both straw bale dikes and silt fencing. The straw bale dike must be installed at least four inches into the ground on the downhill slope which on a steep slope will require ground disturbance of six inches on the upslope side of the straw bale. This extent of disturbance will be necessary for the entire installation of straw bales. Similarly silt fencing requires staking and trenching to prevent water from traveling under the fabric. Such activities immediately atop of the bluff can damage the structural integrity and stability of the soils causing sloughing, shearing, and ultimately instigating erosion on this currently stable bluff. Therefore, installation of both of these practices is encouraged as far from the bluff edge as possible to reduce erosion potential to the bluff and sedimentation of Block Island Sound. Note that south of the pool, it will be difficult to achieve at ten-foot buffer due to the narrow area between the bluff and pool. At this location, these practices should be installed as far from the bluff as possible to reduce the disturbance to the bluff. Additionally related to siting, the silt fencing and straw bales should be installed across the slope (along the contour) to intercept runoff and sediments, rather than traveling down the slope as indicated on the site plan. Both these practices are designed to intercept runoff and sediment which will be more difficult and reduce the capacity of the practice if they are installed do~vn the slope. The appropriate location for these practices has been identified on the enclosed copy of the site plant to ensure proper siting and function of these practices. Siting as well as proper installation of silt fence and straw bales is critical to proper function and water quality protection. However, incorrect installation is commonly witnessed with these practices; therefore the NYS Sediment and Erosion Control Practice Standards are provided as a reference for both silt fencing and straw bale dike installation. It is important th'tT'the silt fencing and s straw bale dike be contiguou and thus the silt fence should be sphced or overlapped. Additionally, the silt fencing fabric should be installed with the fabric placed on the upslope side of the stakes and fabric trenched into the ground six inches on the upslope side and backfilled burying the entire edge of the fabric. No portion of the buried silt fencing should be exposed (as identified in the site plans) as this can allow undermining of the fencing by stormwater runoff. RECEIVED Demolition and Construction Activities: AP~ $ 2Oil Although the lawn and bluff is currendy in stable condition, the proposed construction, if rt~r~f~llv~a~ed and o uut* APP h conducted, poses to threaten the stability of the bluff and the site due to rte steep slopes and close pro~'x~m~um~tt~ t e bluff. Both the slopes and bluff are in stable condition presently. A high degree of ground disturbance and heavy equipment will be necessary in order to facilitate the demolition of the decking, pool and buildings. Ihe weight of mechanical equipment can damage lawn vegetation, cause soil compaction, and threaten the stability of the bluff. Therefore, all access, staging, demohtion, debris removal, and construction activities should occur as much as possible from the north side of the property and no mechanical equipment should tread on the lawn area between the house and bluff. The active sheet and rill erosion witnessed on the northeastern property boundary in association with runoff from the gutter displays the degree erodibility of the slopes at this location. Similarly, any land grading needed in association with the removal of the pool should be done with care and limited access to reduce damage to the lawn. Due to the slopes associated with this property, it is strongly encouraged that the entire house is fitted with gutters and downspouts that discharge into drywells to reduce the erosion risk especially during storm events. This will compensate for the impermeable surfaces of the roof areas of the house. Similarly, the raised decks encourage natural infiltration of groundwater into the soil for which blue-flag walkways wi]] not. Thus the use of such walkways and patios will effectively increase the impermeable areas of the property and subsequently, stormwater runoff. Therefore, care should be taken in the installation of such impermeable surfaces. Landscaping Considerations: To further protect the bluff from landscaping activities, the sprinlder system should be prevented from allowing irrigation spray onto the bluff and be scheduled to prevent excess irrigation water from cresting the top of the bluff. Additionally, landscaping debris (leaves, lawn clippings, branches etc.) should never be disposed of onto the bluff face as this smothers vegetation (as currently witnessed). Over time the loss of vegetation threatens the stability of the bluff and initiates bluff erosion. Once this erosion occurs, it is extremely difficult and very costly to abate. Therefore, prevention is the best measure against bluff erosion. To buffer against large storm events and irrigation, the expansion of the buffer at the top of the bluff is highly encouraged. The buffer should be increased to at least three feet wide through ceasing of mowing activities on this area or through the intentional planting of native species to create such a buffer (which would not be mowed). Ideally the planting of native species such as Little Bluestem (Schizachyruim scoparium), or Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus) to slow velocity of runoff and encourage infiltration will thereby reduce the potential of erosion in association with storm events and irrigation. As these species are native, no supplemental irrigation or fertilizers are necessary which protects the bluff from runoff associated with irrigation apphcations and the Sound from nutrient loading. Lastly, any disturbed areas (Erosion on Northeastern side of property and Pool Area) should be seeded as soon as possible after activities are finished or if they will be left inactive for at least seven days to prevent erosion. The use of sediment and erosion control fabric on slopes is encouraged to help establish good vegetative cover and reduce erosion. Best timing for establishment of grasses is between April and May and August 15~, through September 30th otherwise irrigation is necessary to facilitate germination and establishment. Due to the slopes on this property, it is encouraged that the staging and timing of demolition, grading, construction and seeding occurs within these time frames to reduce the need for irrigation on the slopes which if nor applied properly can cause erosion of the disturbed areas and the bluff. Althou 0 gh the bluff is in stable condition, the reference Stabilization of Erb-ding Bluffs is provided to identify the common causes of bluff erosion and help prevent unintentional detrimental effects to the bluff. If you have any questions or concerns regarding these recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact the office. Sincerely:. ~ Soil District Technician 2427 Isabella Beach Road Fishers Island View from Pool Decking Pool and Decking to be demolished Wing to be demolished Pool House and Under Decking Westward view Bluff, Irrigation System and buffer 'iew from Existin Deck on Bluff Stabile Retaining Wall Landscape ~ew to North along path to beach Wing to be demolished and replaced with blue stone flagging ~ ~ ~Northwestern Erosion from Gutter and © Driveway Bluff ~CEZVED~F PAVED APRON ,~CRES '~ t, PROVIO£ · ~¢ ~ STONE P~KING , ~. P~DE O~ ~TO BE ~DE ~ ~ ELE~RIC ~ T~NSFORMER {WOT I'OUND) PROPOSED PAVED F,F,=64.7 TO BE DDmUSi-IEO%. , HOUSE TO EXISTING PUMP OEMOUSHED R ,o, / / \ 0AD ONE- - Jl~ RDIOVEO .-' / · ' PROi:K}~D SCRB~ED STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRAW BALE DIKE ~OARD O~ App..,i Definition A temporary barrier of straw, or similar material, used to intercept sediment laden runoff from small drainage areas of disturbed soil. Purpose The purpose ora bale dike is to reduce runoff velocity and effect deposition of the transported sediment load. Straw bale dikes have an estimated design life of three (3) months. Conditions Where Practice Applies The straw bale dike is used where: 1. No other practice is feasible. 2. There is no concentration of water in a channel or other drainage way above the barrier. 3. Erosion would occur in the form of sheet erosion. 4. Length of slope above the straw bale dike does not exceed these limits. Constructed Percent Slope Length Slope Slope (ft.) 2:1 50 25 3:1 33 50 4:1 25 75 Where slope gradient changes through the drainage area, steepness refers to the steepest slope section contributing to the straw bale dike. The practice may also be used for a single family lot if the slope is less than 15 percent. The contributing drainage areas in this instance shall be less than one quarter of an acre per 100 feet offence and the length of slope above the dike shall be less than 200 feet. Design Criteria The above table is adequate, in general, for a one-inch rainfall event. Larger storms could cause failure of this practice. Use of this practice in sensitive areas for longer than one month should be specifically designed to store expected runoft~ All bales shall be placed on the contour with cut edge of bale adhering to the ground. See Figure 5A.7 on page 5A. 18 or details. August 2005 Page 5A~ 17 New York Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control Figure 5A.7 Straw Bale Dike ~ECEWED ~O~RD OF APPEALS ,v.,. SYMBDL ' ,, ~ 4' VERTICAL FACE NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AREA NO MORE THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FEET OF STRAW BALE DIKE FOR SLOPES LESS THAN 25Z, ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARDS ~, PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE, ~ ~.._ ~.~.~/~ ~""_.~------ ~ ~DUND DALES PLACED ON CDNT~R. ~~~ ~ RE-BARS, STEEL PICKETS ~ OR ~' STAKES PLACED ~~ I 1/~' TO E' IN GROUND. NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1, ~ALES SHALL ~E PLACED AT THE TOE DF A SLOPE DR ON THE CONTOUR AND IN A ROW WITH ENDS TIGHTLY A~UTTING THE ADJACENT ~ALES. E. EACH ~ALE SHALL 9E EMBEDDED IN THE SOIL A MINIMUM DF (4) INCHES. AND PLACED SO THE ~INDINGS ARE HORIZONTAL, 3. ~ALES SHALL ~E SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE ~Y EITHER TWO STAKES DR RE-~ARS DRIVEN THROUGH THE DALE. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACH BALE SHALL ~E DRIVEN TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY LAID ~ALE AT AN ANGLE TD FDRCE THE ~ALES T~GETHER, STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE ~ALE. 4, INSPECTION SHALL ~E FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE NADE PROHTLY AS NEEDED. 5. ~ALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULLNESS SD AS NOT TO BLOCK DR IMPEDE STORM FLOW DR DRAINAGE, ADAPTED F~ DETAILS P~VIDED ~Y~ USDA - NRCS. NZW YORK STATZ ~PA~T~NT DF Z~SPDRYAT~DN, STRA~ BALE N~W YORK STATZ ~PARTMENT DF ZNV~R~MZNY~ CDNSZRVAT~DN, DIKE NZW YORK STATZ StoL ~ WAT[~ CDNSZRVAT~DN CDMM~TYZZ New York Standards and Specifications Page 5A. 18 August 2005 For Erosion and Sediment Control FOR SILT FENCE BOARD OF ,APPEAl Definition A temporary barrier of geotextile fabric installed on the contours across a slope used to intercept sediment laden runoff from small drainage areas of disturbed soil. Purpose The purpose of a silt fence is to reduce mnoffvelocity and effect deposition of transported sediment load. Limits imposed by ultraviolet stability of the fabric will dictate the maximum period the silt fence may be used (approximately one year). Conditions Where Practice Applies A silt fence may be used subject to the following conditions: 1. Maximum allowable slope lengths contributing runoffto a silt fence placed on a slope am: Slope Maximum Steepness Length (ft.) 2:1 25 3:1 50 4:1 75 5:I or flatter 100 2. Maximum drainage area for overland flow to a silt i-'ence shall not exceed ~A acm per 100 feet of fence, with maximum ponding depth of 1.5 feet behind the fence; and 3. Erosion would occur in the form of sheet erosion; and 4. There is no concentration of water flowing to the barrier. Design Criteria Design computations are not required for installations of 1 month or less. Longer installation periods should be designed for expected runoff. All silt fences shall be placed as close to the areas as possible, but at least 10 feet from the toe of a slope to allow for maintenance and roll down. The area beyond the fence must be undisturbed or stabilized. Sensitive areas to be protected by silt fence may need to be reinforced by using heavy wire fencing for added support to prevent collapse. Where ends of filter cloth come together, they shall be overlapped, folded and stapled to prevent sediment bypass. A detail of the silt fence shall be shown on the plan. See Figure 5A.8 on page 5A.21 for details. Criteria for Silt Fence Materials 1. Silt Fence Fabric: The fabric shall meet the fbllowing specifications unless otherwise approved by the appropriate erosion and sediment control plan approval authority. Such approval shall not constitute statewide acceptance. Fabric Properties Minimum Acceptable Value Test Method Grab Tensile Strength (lbs) 90 ASTM D 1682 Elongation at Failure (%) 50 ASTM D1682 August 2005 Page 5A. 19 New York Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control Mullen Burst Strength (PSI) 190 ASTM D3786 Puncture Strength (lbs) 40 ASTM D751 (modified) Slurff Flow Rate (gal/min/s0 0.3 Equivalent Opening Size 40-80 US Std Sieve CW-02215 Ultraviolet Radiation Stability (%) 90 ASTM G-26 2. Fence Posts (for inabricated units): The length shall be a minimum of 36 inches long. Wood posts will be of sound quality hardwood with a minimum cross sectional area of 3.0 square inches. Steel posts will be standard T and U section weighing not less than 1.00 pound per linear foot. 3. Wire Fence (for fabricated units): Wire fencing shall be a minimum 14 gage with a maximum 6 in. mesh opening, or as approved. 4. Prefabricated Units: Envirofence, Geofab, or approved equal, may be used in lieu of the above method providing the unit is installed per details shown in Figure 5A.8. ~ECE~¥ED APR $ ?.011 ~OARD OF AI~EALS New York Standards and Specifications Page 5A.20 August 2005 For Erosion and Sediment Control RECEIVED bq APR $ 2011 BOARD OFAPPEALS Figure 5A.8 Silt Fence WDVEN WIRE FENCE SYMBOL (MIN. 14 GAUGE ~-W/ MAX. 6' MESH i___lI.i --~-~)~G/,./~ 36" MIN, LENGTH FENCE -~. ' ~ ~ PASTS DRIVEN HIN. 16' ~ . ,,.~,. __ INTD GRDUND. ..;. ." 36' HIN. FENCE PDST~ WDVEN WIRE FENCE ?IN. 14 ~~ ~ 1/E GAUGE W/ MAX. 6 MESH ~ Illl FLaW IIII ~ ~ _ / UNDISTURBED GRDUND CDMPACTED SDIL--, ~ X EMBED FILTER CLDTH J~ 16'MIN. A MIN. DF 6' IN GRDUND. ._~ . CDNSTRUCTIDN SPECIFICATIDNS i. WDVEN WIRE FENCE TD ~[ FASTENED SECURELY TD FENCE PASTS WITH WIRE TIES DR STAPLES. PASTS SHALL ~[ STEEL EITHER "T' DR 'U' TYPE DR HARDVDDD. E, FILTER CLDTH TD ~E TD ~[ FASTENED SECURELY TD WDVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY E4' AT TaP AND MID SECTIDN. FENCE SHALL ~[ WDVEN WIRE, 6" MAXIMUM MESH DPENING. 3. WHEN TWa S[CTIDNS DF FILTER CLDTH AD JaiN EACH DTHER THEY SHALL ~[ aVER- LAPPED ]Y ~IX INCHES AND FDLDED. FILTER CLDTH ~HALL ~[ EITHER FILTER X, MIRAFI IOOX, STA~ILINKA T[4ON, DR APPRDVED EQUIVALENT. 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL ~E GEDFA~, ENVIRDFENCE, DR APPRDVED EQUIVALENT. S. MAINTENANCE SHALL ~E PERFDRMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMDVED WHEN '~ULGES" DEVELDP IN THE SILT FENCE, ADAPTED FRaM DETAILS PRDVID[D ~Y. USaA - NRCS, NEW YDRK STATE DEPARTMENT DF TRANSPDRTATIDN, SILT FENCE NEW YDRK STATE DEPARTMENT DF ~NVIRDNMENTAL CDNSERVATIDN, NEW YDRK STATE SaIL ~ WATER CDNSERVATIDN ~DMMITTE~ August 2005 Page 5A.21 New York Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control New York Standards and Specifications Page 5A.22 August 2005 For Erosion and Sediment Control NRCS APR 6 2011 ~OARD OF .a, pp£A i.s United States Deparhnent of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Suffolk County Soil & Water Conservation District STABILIZATION OF ERODING BLUFFS L Thc coastal shoreline is affected by many different fomcs and is exposed to many harsh conditions. A result of these forces and conditions is erosion. Bluff erosion is a natural process that can be slowed but not stopped. The only prethcfion that can be made is that bluff erosion will occur; the timing and degree of the erosion cannot. Areas along the coastline may experience accelerated rates of erosion due to factors such as winter storms and extreme high tides. In these instances, houses and structures built on the top of the bluffs are at risk fi-om erosion. The erosion of high sandy bluffs along coastlines has challenged conservationists since they were first observed. Typical of such bluffs are those along the north shore of Long Island. The soil material is sandy and erosive, easily moved by wind or water. Bluff height varies fi.om a few feet, to well over 100 feet. The slope is usually about 1:1, or at whatever angle the material is stable. The profiles of eroding and stabile bluffs are represented below. TFpical characteristics o[ eroding bluffs sloping the wrong direction over hanging lip '~~ remnant, of old vegetation, boulde,, eft devegetated ~lope May2007 1 rFpical procedures that have had a dqsirable effect on slowing bluff erosion~O~g~ O~ t~PPI~t~'S III. Numerous attempts have been made by landowners to stabilize bluff slopes; only a few have succeeded. Although no procedure can guarantee a permanent solution or stop this erosion, the following measures have been found to be the most effective in obtaining the best possible stabilization of the bluff face. Stabilization of the toe and top of the bluff (ideally simultaneously) must occur. Implementing practices (such as revegetation, terracing, geo-textiles) without achieving this stability will not be successful. Resulting in a loss of time, resources, and financial investment as these areas are compromised by erosion. Once both of these areas are stabilized, efforts should be focused on remed'latmg the bluff face. Although stabilization of the toe and top is recommended first, the environment should be evaluated holistically. Thereby, remediation of thc bluff face should occur in conjunction with and/or as soon as possible after the remediation of the top and toe. May 2007 Top Stabilization: a. Remove the overhanging lip at the top of the slope creating a natural angle of repose. This is generally a 1:1 slope or 45 degree angle. b. Any trees along the top edge oftbe bluffsbould be cut at the base leaving the roots in place. Tall trees swaying in the wind will loosen the bluff soils. c. Do not allow surface water (i.e. pool water, runoff, imgation water) to flow over the top of the slope. Installation of a diversion with a catch basin drain and a vegetated natural buffer both serve this purpose. d. No ground disturbing activities should occur within 10 feet of the edge of the bluff This includes installation of landscaping plants, irrigation systems, decks, and fences. e. Pools should be installed with an in ground drain to facilitate drainage (unless clay lenses exist within the bluff profile). 2 ~O'tl~D OF ,4pp~,4t.$ f. Houses should be fitted with gutters and down spouts which discharge into ch'y wells in order to reduce runoff flowing over the bluff edge. g Sprinklers should not discharge water onto or near the bluffface. h. Imgation scbedulmg should not exceed the peak consumptive reqmrements of the turf grasses (approximately 1" per week). May 2007 Toe Stabilization: a. The use of vegetation is the preferred method to maintain a stabile toe. However, vegetation alone is not always successful. A good indicator of whether or not vegetation will stabilize the too is the location of the mean high tide (MHT) mark. If MHT reaches the too of the bluff, it is unlikely that vegetation alone will stabilize this site. If this is the situation, a consultation with NRCS or the SC SWCD can provide you with other alternatives. b. If a hardening structure, such as a bulkhead or rock revetment exists, it is critical that proper maintenance occurs to these structures. Such regular maintenance prolongs the life. The additional benefits are the protection the toe of the bluff and reduction m repair/replacement costs. The following are the maintenance activities that should occur on the bulkhead. ~ Decaying and or damaged boards should be replaced. ~' Holes behind the bulkhead should be filled with san& } Geotemile must be maintained between the bulkhead or revetment in order to retain sand behind the structure. The lack of geotextile in combination with wave action will pull sediment through the structure eventually cause collapse and failure. } Vegetation (beach grass, Spartina patens, Coastal Panic grass) should be maintained on top of the bulkhead. Bluff Face: a. Any trees along the top edge and on the bluff face should be cut at the base leaving the roots in place. b. Trash, grass clippings, leaves and branches should not be disposed of on the bluff face. This creates instability as the debris adds weight to the bluff face and dually smothers vegetation. Thus, such debris should be removed from the bluff face and disposed of properly. c. A natural angle of repose should occur on the bluff face. Depending on the height and location of the vertical faces, such an angle may not be practical. Grading is a satisfactory practice to create such a natural slope at locations where such an angle can be achieved. Care should be taken to not disturb stabile areas of the bluff in an attempt to stabilize the eroding locations. Such precautions will prevent additional erosion problems on the bluff. d. Re/Vegetate the slope. ~' 'Cape' American beach grass and Spartinapatens plugs should be used for this purpose and transplanted while dormant in the late winter or 3 early spring. Planting should occur fi.om the top of the bluff face down. Both Spartina and Beachgrass should be planted 12" apart. Rows should be separated by 12" and the plant~ should be staggered with plants in adjacent rows. Each full row should consist of entirely Beachgrass or Spartina and the rows should alternate between these the two species. For Beachgrass, one 35mm film canister of Osmocote slow release fertilizer should be placed into each planting hole and then plant three stems or culms per hole. To add diversity to the bluff planting, reduce the threat of disease, and compensate for natural beach grass die out, it is recommended to broadcast the following warm season grass mixture immediately prior to planting the 'Cape' American beach grass. The warm season grass mixture should consist of: 'Blackwell' Switch grass (Panicum virgatum)* 4 PLS lb/Ac 'Atlantic' Coastal panic grass (Panictmt amarum)* 5 PLS lb/Ac 'Niagara' Big bluestem (Andropogon gerantii)* 5 PLS lb/Ac Coastal Little bluestem (Schizachy~um seopariurn v. littoriale)* 3 PLS lb/Ac Sheep rescue (Festuca ovina) for quick, temporary cover 10 lb/Ac 'Monarch' Seaside Goldenrod (Solidago sernpervi~,ns v. Monarch) 1 lb/Ac 'Golden Jubilee' Black-eyed Susan (Rudbedaa hirta) 1 lb/Ac Partridge Pea (Chamaecristafasciculata) 1 lb/Ac Common Evening Primrose Oenolhera biennis) 1 lb/Ac (*Rates are in Pure Live Seed Pounds Per Acre.) Spreading this seed mix just prior to planting the Beachgrass and Spartina, allows for the incorporation of the seed by foot traffic and sand disturbance as the beach grass is planted~ This action is critical to a good seed establishment. Adapted shrubs and vines can be added when the slope is well stabilized with the above listed grasses. Species include Bayberry, Beach pea, Shore rose, and Beach plum. } Apply 20 lb/ac of nitrogen in June if beach grass vigor is decllmng. ~ Maintenance of the vegetated slope will be required on a continuous basis. Remove debris fi.om planted areas; keep all wa~r diverted from the slope; do not over-irrigate the lawn above; avoid excessive foot traffic and repair any damaged or eroding areas. May 2007 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL To: Sam Fitzgerald for Anne Bunting P O Box 447 Fishers Island, NY 06390 APPEALS Please take notice that your application dated January 24, 20~OARD OF DATE: January 24, 2011 RECEIVED..~, - ~ FEB 8 Z01 For'permit for adds & alts to an existing dwelling & construction of an accessory structure at Location of property 2427 Isabella Beach Rd., Fishers Island, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 10 Block 6 Lot 14.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The construction to an ~exi~s~on a lot in the R120 zone is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII, Seetioh 2~80- 116A( 1 )~ y0hich states: "All buildings or structui-e"~ iocaieu o~"~ lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluffor bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100' fi.om the top of such bluffor The dwelling construction is noted as being approx. 40' from the top of the bluff. Also, the proposed accessory screened pergola is not permitted per 280-116A(1)~ since it is located at 26'fi.om the top of bluff ~-~_ ~ In addition, the dwelling construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Sectio ,~280- l~lwhich states: "No building or premises shall be used & no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in R120 District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule & Parking Schedule incorporated into this chapter with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein full." The required fi.om yard setback in the R120 Zone is 60' feet. The survey indicates the addition at a minimum setback of approx. 46.5'. Also/~~creation of a detached garage with storage above is not permitted per Article III, Sect~0nr280-15F Which requires that accessory structures located in the front yard meet the required fi.ont Xvgrd sCbae~. The required fi.ont yard setback is 60'. The proposed setback is 20.59' Authorized Signature F~: $ .__ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BO~l!i~ House Nojk 2427 Street Isabella Beach Road SCTM 1000Section 10 Block 6 Lot(s) 14.1 SCTM 1000 Section 11 Block 1 Lot(s) 7.5 Hamlet Fishers Island Lot Size 2.79 +/- ac. Zone R-120 Lot Size .38 +/- ac. Zone R-120 I (WE).APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 1/24/11 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 12/14/10 (1/31/11). Applicant(O/Owner(s): Anne R. Bunting Mailing Address: cio Bunting Management Group, 217 Intemational Circle, Hunt Valley, MD 21030 Telephone: (410) 229-0124 Fax: (443) 378-7022 Email: info@buntingoffice.com NOTE: In addition to the above~ please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Samuel W, Fitzgerald, architect for (X) Owner ( )Other: Address: P.O. Box 447, The Gloaming, Fishers Island, NY 06390 Telephone: (860) 287-3808 Fax: (631) 788-7192 Email: samfitzgeraldarchitect@gmail.com Please check to specify who you wish correspotulence to be mailed to, from the above names: ( ) Applicant/Owner(s), {X) Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 12114/10 (1/31/11) and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 1/24/11 FOR: (X) Building permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( ) Permit for As-Built Construction ~ ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) Article: XXII Section: 280- Subsection: 116A(1) XXII 280- 116A(1) XXIII 280- 14 III 280- 15F Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (X) A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ( ) Reversal or Other A prior appeal (X) has, ( ) has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). 3047 Year(s). 1982 . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) Name of Owner: Anne R. I~ng ,File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (additional sheets mar be used with preparer's signature): BOARD OF APPEALS The existing house was built in the 1920's on a property overlooking Block Island Sound, along the edge of a bluff. The closest point from the top-of-bluff to the existing principal structure is approximately 40', well under the currently required 100'. The existing front yard setback is also non-conforming at 20.59' instead of the required 60'. Also, the existing above-ground swimming pool complex is only 3' from the top-of-bluff and will be removed. The reason for this appeal is that we are proposing construction activity within 100' of the top-of-bluff, and within 60' of the front yard setback. However, with this proposed work we are not increasing the non-conformity toward the bluff, nor are we increasing the non-conformity of the front yard setback. We are proposing to remove significant portions of the built structures on the property and increase the amount of open space and reduce many non-conformities. The existing rambling two-story frame house has been added to and altered over the years. It currently contains seven bedrooms and totals 4,768 square feet of livable floor area. In 1982, a swimming pool, storage building and spa were added to the property, connected to the house by a network of decks. The current building area of the property is 8,124 square feet on a lot s/ze of 138,030 sq. fL Anne R. Bunting, the current owner, fell in love with the beautiful property but considers the house to be unwieldy and overbearing. She also feels that many oftbe alterations to the house, carded out principally from the 1970's to the 1990's, detract from the architectural integrity of the original 1920's design. Mrs. Bunting feels very strongly about the environment and wants to reduce her footprint as much as possible. As architects, our mandate from the owner was to remove as much oftbe existing structures as possible--house, swimming pool, decks, etc.-- while still keeping the house functional. At the same time, we were to restore the architectural integrity of the house, and find ways to better integrate the house into the landscape. Our proposed design removes 1,666 square feet of livable floor area from the existing house, and reduces the building area on the property by over 3,900 square feet. We are reducing the number of bedrooms from seven to three. We are removing most of the additions that are not original to the house and property: solarium; master bedroom and family mom addition; pool; storage building; and adjoining decks. All of this area will be returned to natural grade and left to grow naturally, or landscaped with native plantings, as it will not be lawn. We also intend to remove another section of the house so as to separate the existing attached garage from the rest of the house and attach it only with a covered deck and deck structure. Our intention here is to remove unnecessary square footage, but also to create more ora relationship between the front and rear yards. From the front yard, currently, the existing house acts as a barricade--you wouldn't even know that Block Island Sound is on the other side--and effectively divides the property into two halves. By removing this portion of the house, we are creating a connection between the front and rear yards, and better integrating the house with the land. Now you will see enticing views of Block Island Sound from the front yard area. In place of the existing 3,000 sq. ft. above-ground pool area, we are proposing a 121 sq. ft. pergola which will hardly be visible. This small structure will be made of simple rough-hewn timbers, perhaps natural logs, with a thatch or green roof that is of an undulating shape that matches the natural contours of the land. The owner feels that creating this type of serene, contemplative place is a more appropriate use of the land than a large swimming pool complex. -2- , Name of Owner: Anne R. I VARIANCE NO. 1 - PROPOSED BLUESTON T Article XXII, Section 280-116A(1) t FE~ a ?~: -- ~RE~ V,4nLaNCE nElSONS: BOARD OF APPEALS (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the ndghborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: The applicant is proposing to remoYe a wood deck along the rear of the existing house and replace it with a more organically-shaped bluestone terrace of a very similar size. The closest setback from the top-of-bluff to the existing wood deck is 40'. The setback to the proposed bluestone terrace would also be 40' at its closest point. In effect there is no material change, as the bluestone terrace retains the residential character of the property. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because:any work to a portion of a principal structure within existing non-conforming setbacks must go through the variance process. (3) The amount of relief requestod is not substantial because:the closest setbacks from the top-of-bluff to the existing deck and to the proposed terrace are essentially the same. It is essentially a replacement of what already exists. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The bluestone terrace will not be visible from any neighbor's property. In addition, the bluestone terrace is an improvement over the wood deck in many ways: it has more of an organic shape, which will settle into the landscape better; it will be easier to maintain than the wood deck (which gets ravaged by the coastal weather); the stone pavers make you feel more grounded and connected to the earth, resulting in a more sensitive response to the environment. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? 00Yes, or ( )No. The owner is delighted to see all the pressure-treated wood removed from the property. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: [3 No. E] Yes (v/ease furnish corn& This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box ( ) IF A USE V/iRIANCE IS BEING, REQUESTED, A~VD PLEASE COMPLETE THE Slgnat~e ot;A'pl~ell~'nt o~Authorized Agent (A~ent must submit writt~z Authorization from Owner) Sworn tg.~e,fore me this t day of ~ ,20|t Name of Owner: Anne RECEIVED ! VARIANCE NO. 2 - PROPOSED PERGOLA FEB S 7011 Article XXlI, Section 280-t 16A(1) BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE REASONS: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the n~ighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because:The applicant is proposing to replace a 3.000 square foot swimming pool complex, which includes a partially above-ground pool, storage building, spa, and a network of multi-level decks, with a 121 square foot pergola. This structure will be made of rough-hewn timbers, perhaps natural logs, with a thatch or green roof that is of an undulating shape that matches the natural contours of the land. This will be an aesthetic improvement to the character of this residential neighborhood. (2) The benefit sought by the appUcant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: There is no way to build a small pergola in the rear yard without a variance. Under existing regulations, the entire rear yard as well as the existing house are within the 100' top-of-bluff setback, if we were to locate this small structure outside of the 100' setback, it would be in the front of the house (on the street side) or in a side yard and may not even have a view of Block Island Sound. It is not unreasonable for a pergola with a water view to be located in this location after removing the swimming pool complex. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because:The closest setback from the top-of-bluff to the existing swimming pool structure is approx. 3'. The applicant is proposing a setback of 26' for the 121 sq. ft. pergola, thereby reducing the non-conformity of the setback. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The placement of the pergola in the proposed location will not be visible from any neighbor's properbL The pergola will be modest in size and blend in with the landscape.The elimination of the 3,000 square foot pool complex will in itself be a huge improvement to the property in exchange for a proposed 121 sq. ft. structure, which will have no adverse effect on existing evironmental or physical conditions in the neighborhood. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? 00Yes, or ( )No. The applicant believes that the creation of this structure is more in keeping with the aesthetics of the property. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: ~X No. [3 Yes (vlease furnizh coovL This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the Same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box ( ) IF A USE VA~. ~m.CE IS BEING, P~EQUEST~D, AND PLEASE COMPLETE ATTACHED USE VARIANCE SHEET: (Please be sure to Signat~f ~pel~an~ or Authorized Agent (Agent mu~ aubmlt written Authorization from Owner) Sworn ~fore me th s [ : day of~.~_ ~, ,~'~ THE NameofOwner: Anne R. ~ng File RECEIVED I VARIANCE NO. 3 - PROPOSED DECK EXTENSION Article XXlll, Section 280-14 FEB 8 A ,EA VARIANCE REASONS: BOARD OF APPEALS (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the n~ighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties If granted, because:The front yard setback at the existing garage is 20.59' and has existed since the 1920's. There is an existing wood deck directly behind the garage. The applicant is proposing to demolish the kitchen and sun room, and extend the existing deck into this demolished area. The applicant is proposing to replace the deckboards on the existing deck and extend the existing deck area (with new steps down to grade) by 92 sq. ft. This will result in an extension in the front yard area of 7.5'. The front yard setback on the proposed deck extension will be 46.5', still almost 26' behind the front facade of the garage. There is no impact on the residential character of the neighborhood with this slight increase in the deck area. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The existing deck is non-conforming, as it is 54' from the front property line, short of the required 60'. Any work to this deck would require a variance., and yet the slight increase in area is necessary to complete the open space, (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial becanse:The new deck extension would still be approx. 26' southerly of the northerly point of the existing garage, which is 20.59' from the property line. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The existing deck consisting of pressure treated wood deck boards will be replaced by a deck consisting of sustainably harvested South American hardwood, which is an environmentally-responsible material, thereby improving the environmental conditions on this property. 6) Has the alleged difficulty been ~lgcrea~d? 00Ye~ or ( )No. As a result a substantial improvement will occur by creating the open space which will reduce the carbon footprint by giving a pleasing view of Block Island Sound. Arethere Covenantsand Restrletionsconcerningthisland: ~ No. ~ Yes(~sefurn~hcot~vl. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box ( ) IF .4 USE V,4r~. ~NCE IS BEING P~EQUESTEI~, AND PLE,4SE COMPLETE A TTA CHED USE VARIANCE SHEET: (Please besuretoco~f~~ Swo~ t~ore me th s day of~0 THE Name of Owner: Anne R. 4ag VARIANCE NO. 4- CREATIO.N OF DE .T. ACHED ACCES OI fi CTURE Article III, Section 280-15F ~ FEB 8 ;~!i~l~ AREA VARIANCE REASONS: BOARD OF APPEALS (l) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because:Currently there is an attached two-car garage in the existing house. The front yard setback at the garage is 20.59', short of the required 60'. The applicant is proposing to remove a portion of the existing house so as to separate the garage from the main body of the house and create a detached accessory structure. The front yard setback at the garage will not change from what is presently existing of 20.59'. There will be no matedal change in the appearance of the garage from the street, and no change in the residential character of the neighborhood. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The applicant's intention in separating the garage from the house is to not only remove unnecessary square footage, but also to create more of a relationship between the front and rear yards. From the front yard, currently, the existing house acts as a barricade and effectively divides the property into two halves. By removing this portion of the house, a connection between the front and rear yards is created, and better integration of the house with the land is achieved. With this proposed change, Block Island Sound will now be in view from the front yard. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because:There will be no increase in the existing non-conforming setbacks. Detaching the garage and creating open space reduces the amount of living space in the area of the existing kitchen and sun room, thereby reducing the overall square footage in this area of the property. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or en~lronmantai conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The separation of the garage and house will not be obviously visible from the street. More open space will be a benefit to the environment, and the applicant's covered deck will allow protection from the weather. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? (}OYes, or ( )NO. This will be a vast improvement to the property. The house will be of a much better proportion for the property once it is reduced in size. By detaching the garage to a separate structure, we create open space, connecting the front and rear which will have a significant benefit to the character of the property. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: ~l No. [3 Yes (alease furnish coavl. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the commnnity. Check this box ( ) IF A USE V.4Rr. I~NCE iS BEING RI~QUESTED, tAND ~LEASE COMPLETE THE t Signature c]f Al~p~[l~nt o~ Au[hortzed Agent ~ ~orizntion from Owner) APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRI~ON k (For ZBA R¢£erence) F~ 8 Samuel W. Fitzgerald, agent, for Anne R. Bunting, Applicant: 2427 Isabella Beach Rd., Fishers Island, NY Date Prepared: 1/28/1,.,... ~_1 '"~:~;~ c,~L~ U~- APPEALS I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas ?lease describe areas being removed: 1) Enlire swimmin~ pool complex, including po~, surroundir~ dec~, s~ buidin~, spa, and pool equipment enclosure; 2) solarium and all adjoinin~ decks; 3) two~ farrty room and maser bedroom explain on norlh side of house; 4) er~re ler~ of deck alor~ southeast (w-g~) side cf house; 5) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: Two additions: 1) 44'x 18' (master bath and gallery); 2) 24'-8" x 14'-6' (kitchen / pantry) Dimensions of new second floor: N/A Dimensions of floor above second level: None Height (from fmisbed ground to top of ridge): Existing: 26'-4" (no change) New one-story addition: 11'-$" (master bath and gallery) Is b~sement or lowest floor ama b~ing constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: None IIL Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach ~tm sheet if n~eessary) - Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and general Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: The existing house is a seven-bedroom, two-story frame structure with a crawlspace and unfinished attic totaling 4,768 sq. ft. of livable floor area. Also on the property are two accessory structures, a swimming pool and an extensive network of decks and porches that brings the total building area of the property to 8,124 sq. ft. Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: The number of floors will remain the same. The livable floor area of the house will decrease from 4,768 SCl. ft to :3,102 sCl. ft., a :35% reduction oYer the existing. A aignificant portion of the decks and other built structures on the property will be removed, reducing the building area for the property from 8,124 sq. ft. to 4,194 sq. ft., or a 48% reduction. l'V. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 8,124 sq. ft. (building area) Proposed increase of building coverage: No increase - proposed building area is decreased to 4,194 sq. ff. Squrtr~ footage of your lot: 138,0:30 sq. ft. (buildable land is 85,:359 sq. ft.) Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 5% - see page 7A for detailed lot coverage calculations V. Purpose of New Construction: The house will remain as a single family dwelling. The owner would like to remove unnecessary square footage from the house and the other built structures, while at the same time improving the house architecturally and providing a better integration of the house with the landscape. VI. Please describe the laad contours (fiat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s):The property is located on Block Island Sound. There is a very stable, well-vegetated bluff of 26% slope rising 47' at its highest point from the beach to a gently sloping manicured lawn. The existing setback from the top-of-bluff to the principal structure is 40'. Most of the property is cleared and well landscaped with lawns, hedges, planting beds, etc. To the west of the property is a wooded area. To the east of the property is Isabella Beach. The applicant's particular difficulty in meeting the code requirement is the non-conforming setback of the principal structure, built in the 1920's, from the bluff. Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view, 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 -7- OAPPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCR~ION CONT'D (For ZBA Reference) Samuel W. Fitzgerald, agent, for Anne R. Bunting, Applicaat: 2427 Isabella Beach Rd., Fishers Island, NY Date Prepared: - 1/28/11 AREA AND LOT COVERAGE CALCULATIONS BOARD OF APPEALS ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED Existing to Newly Remain Constructed (ETR) (NC) BulldinD Area Main House (first floor) 3,169 1,230 529 Shed 152 Storage Building 193 Pergola 121 Newly Detached Garage (first floor) 605 All Other Built Structures Above Grade 4,610 242 1,468 Total Building Area 8,124 2,076 2,118 Total Proposed Building Area (ETR + NC) 4,194 Lot Area (sq. fl.) Lot 14.1 121,502 Lot 7.5 16,528 Total Lot Area {sq. ft) 138,030 Lot Coverage (Percentage of Building Area on Buildable Land) Buildable Land ~ Lot 14.1 75,768 Buildable Land - Lot 7.5 7,591 Total Buildable Land 83,359 Lot Coverage, Existing and Proposed 10% 5% Livable Floor Area - Main House First Floor 2,564 1,230 529 Second Floor 2,205 1,343 0 Total Livable Area 4,768 2,573 529 Total Proposed Livable Area (ETR + NC) 3,102 - 7A - QUESTIONNAIRE BOARD OF APPEALS FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION .C. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes, please explain on attached sheet. We intend to remove a swimming poe! that is partially above ground but, once removed, the area will be restored to the surrounding natural contours. .1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Yes 20 Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? Yes .3.) Is the prOPerty bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? There is no need for a bulkhead beCause there is a very stable, well-vegetated bluff of 26% slope dsing 47' at its highest point from the beach to the upland building area. 4.) If yom: property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Yes Please confirm status of yom: inquiry or application with the Trustees:We are in the process of making application to the Trustees concurrent with this ZBA application. and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. Is there a depression or slOPing elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five 'feet above'mean sea level? No Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you.are submitting? None Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state none on the above line. Do you 'have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? No If ye~, please submit a copy of YOur building Permit and sUrVey as approved by the Building Depamnent and please describe: Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises, if any are lacking, please apply, to the Building Depaftmeat to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? No If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Single family residential and the proposed use Same, with reduced built footprint .., . (ex: existing single family, proposed: same with ga'age, pool or other) Authon~d sign~tu~ and Date AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD /r RECE~'VED ~/ WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: The form must be completed by the applicant for any special use pertn~t, site plan approval, use variance, or subdivision approval on prapeng/ within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet Of a farm opera[ion located in agricultural distric~ All applications requiring an agricultural data ~tatetnent must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordtmce with Sections 239- m anti 239-n of the General Municipal l.~w. 1) Name'ofApplicaat: Samuel VV. Fitzgerald, Architect 2) Address of Applicant: Sam Fitzgerald Architect, PC, P.O. Box 447, The GIo. ami,ng, Fishers Island,, NY 06390 3) Name'of Laad Owner (i~'other than applicant): Anne. R. Bunting 4) Address of Land Owner:. 2427 Isabella Beach Roa(J Fishers Island, NY 06390 5) Description of Propesed Project: Alterations to existing single family .residence and accessory struCtures 6) Location of Property (road and tax map number): SCTM 1000 Section 10, Block 6, Lot 14.1 SCTM 1000 Section 11, Block 1, Lot 7.5 7) Is the parcel within an agricultural district? [] No []Y~ If yes, Agricultural District Number 8) Is this parcel actively fanned? []No [-]Yes 9) Name and address of any owner(s)'of, land within the agricultural district containing active farm operation(s) located 500 feet of the boundary of the proposed project. (Information may be available through the Town ASSe~ora Office, Town Hall location (765-1937) or from any public computer at the Town Hall locations by viewing the parcel numbers on the Town of Southold Real Property Tax System. _Name and AddreSs 4. 5. 6. (Please i~ back side'of page if more than six property owners are identified.) The lot numl~rs may be obtained, in advance, when requested from'either the Offic~ of the Plaiming Board at · 765-1938 or,he Zg/a_~3~ Board qf Appeals at 765-1809. Si fe Note: I. The local board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed actio'h on d3air farm operatioa. ,Solicitation will be made by supplying.a oopy oftliis statement. 2. Comments r~tumed to the local board will be taken into conaidera~on as part of the overail mvi~w of this applicatign. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Ststement shall be sent by appliamt and/or the cJerk of the board to the property owners identified abo~te. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the aplJliqmt at the time the application is submitted for review. Failure to pay at s,lch time means the application is not complete and cannot be acted upon by the board. 1-14-09 -10- PROJECT 'ID NUMBER APPENDIX C s;A;~ EN~nRONMENTAL c~u~rrY ~W SHORT ENVIRO~ENTAL A~ESSMENT FORM ~r U~L~ ~S On~ P~T t. ~O~cT INFOR~ON ( To ~ ~ by 1. A~LI~T I ~R Samuel, W. Fi~ge~ld, a~hitect and agent ~', Bunting Resid, en~_,_,, ~,~ L~TION: 2427 Isabella Beach Road I Suffolk ~ Fishem Island, NY 06390 SCTM 1000 Section 10, Block 6, Lot 14.1 SCTM 1000 Section 11, Block 1, Lot 7.5 ~8. ~8~BE ~Em B~LY: Ntemfions to existing 1920's ~sto~ ~me single ~mily residen~ and ~er stratums. The pmpe~ is I~ted on Bilk Island Sound, There am ~veml ~m~nen~ to ~is pmj~: 1. Remove existing swimming pool complex, which include pool, p~l house, spa, and muRi-level d~ks, and other decks and terraces around the existing house. Restore distu~ grade to natural contoum. 2. Remove approximately 2,195 sq. fi. from the existing house, including a s~ion of ~e existin~ouse that will separate the currently a~ached garage from the main ~dy of the ~use ~~eta~ a~sso~ structure; 3. Add ~o one-sto~ additions totaling 529 square feet; FEB 011 4. Full renovation of the residence 5. Add a small pergola to the prope~y upland ~ the bl~ line. ~Y= ~' ~ If ~ ~: The existing set~ck closest ~int f~m ~e tO~-blu~ is 40', sho~ ~ the mgui~ed the gagge is 20.5g', sho~ ~e ~u~ 80'. ...... DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, [~']Ye$ [~No If yes, I~t agency name and permll I applx~val:. Southold Trustees, ZBA and building department ~.DOES ~ ~SP~CT OF THE ^CHON ~VE ^ CURRE~.Y V~D PERMrt O~ ~OVA~? NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL 1.~,,_ASe~A~ I~.~,~JLT OF PROPOSED ACTION ~ ~8TING PE~ITI ~P~AL ~ ~IF~AT~N? ~ N/A I C~ T~T ~E INF~MA~ PROVIDED A~E IS ~UE TO ~E ~ ~ ~ ~O~E ,- .. __, If~e action ~ a Cos~l Area, ~d you are a s~le a~y, compile ~e Coas~l ~es~ent Fo~ ~ore ~ing w~ this ~sesamenl -11- P~ Ii - iMPACT ASSF-.~SMENT ('1'o be c ,om~,leted by Lead A. DOE8 ACllON EXCEED AN~ 'WPE I THRE~;~IOt'D IN 6 NYCRR, PART 6~7,47 If ye~, o~3rdlnale ~he redew pmmla, and use t~e FUL~ EAF. B. WlLLACTIONRECEtVECOORDg~IATED REVIEWASPROVIDEDFORUNLISTEDACTION01N6~R,*PART617.67 IfNo, al'l~g~tlve de~amtfon may be ~upemed~ by another Invoh~d a~lW. G. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY A~VE/L,qE EFFECTs A,.e~OClATED Wn'H THE FOLLY: (An~wem may be hand~ltten. If ~) . T~ f~ HAVE: AN IMPACT Off THE I~NMEHTAL CHARACTE~STICS ~T CA~ ~ E~ABLISHME~ ~ A C~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (a) sem~ ~e. ~n = ~ (b) ~ ~ ~; (c) ~l~; (d) ~: (e) ~ ~e; ~ (~ ~e. If ~. ~ a~ ~ ~ ~u~ ~. E~ ~t ~e~ ~ Name et Lead Agency Date ..... Tile off Res~e Ofll~er Signature of ReSpOnsible Officer in Lead Agency S~gna~ure of Preparer (if different from re~pontil~e'ollic~) -12- APPLICANT SACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: ANNE ~ BUNTING (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance Special Exception If "Other", name the activity: ZBA Variances and Board of Town Trustees Applications Change of Zone Approval of Plat / Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other FEB 2 4 ZOO~ BOARD OF APPEALs: Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YEs l I NO[ ] Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: none Title or position of that person: N/A Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): [ 1 ] A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); ..l B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); J C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or ] D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP No relationship. Submitted this ,~'~ day of February, 2011. Signature: ~ ~--t_~ Print Name: Anne .~, Bunting/ APPLICANT NSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: RICHARD F. LARK (Last name, fast name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance Special Exception If "Other", name the activity:. ZBA Variances and Beard of Town Trustees ^pplieations Change of Zone L I Approval of Plat L J Exemption fi.om Plat or Official Map I ] Other l ~ J Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES l I No l ,' Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: none Title or position of that person: N/A Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): [ 1 I I ] A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); .l B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); I c) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or I D) the actual applicant. DESCPdPTION OF RELATIONSHIP No relationship. Submitted this 2 y~r day. o.f February, 2011. Signature: ~~t~ Print Name: Richard F.~ 'L'~TM RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 Tele. No. (631) 734-680?' Fax No. (631} 734-5651 E-mail: LarkandFolts@aol.com February 24, 2011 E, OARD OF APPEALS Ms. Vicki Toth Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Application - Anne R. Bunting {SCTM #1000-10-6-14.1 and #1000-11-1-7.5) Dear Ms. Toth: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing Applicant Transactional Disclosure Forms signed by the owner and myself which were not submitted with the original application on February 3, 2011. Very truly yours, RFL/bd Enclosures TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of $onthold's Co(~ of E~hics nmhibits conflicts of interest on tho PM 9f town Officers and emolov~es. The uurco~ 9f this form is to orovide information which can al~ th~ town ofouss~le confllc~s ofintcrest and allow it to teke whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Fitzgerald, Samuel W., architect and agent for the owner, Anne R. Bunting (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless yon are applying in the name of ~omcone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the othcr pe~on's or COmpany's name.) ~ NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building X Variance X Trustee X Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map ' Planning Other (]f"Other", name the activity.). Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business i ntcresc "Business interest" means a business, including a parmership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a annotation ~n which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shams. YES NO X If you answered '~YES', complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of persun employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that persen Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicenffagen~/representative) and thc town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her slxmse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all tha~ apply): A) the owner of great' than 5 % of tbe shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when ~ applicant is a corporation); B) th~ legal or bmefi¢ial owner of any interest in a nco-corporate entity (when t? applicant is not a corporation); RECEIVED ___C) an officor, director, pmlner, or employce of the applicant; or __.D) the actual applicant. ! FEB 8 2011 DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP BOARD OF APPEALS Both architect and owner have no relationships. Form TS 1 Submitted thil ~.~ay of ~ 20~L_ Signature la,ti II L..al J PrintName ~t[q ~ -9- Town of Southold A. INSTRUCTIONS LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM RECEIVED FE~ 8 20M All applicants for permits* including Town of Southoid agencies, proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon lhe coastal area (which includes all of Southnld Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement oftbe LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Beard of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION 10 6 14.1 SCTM# 11 _ 1 7.5 Owner: Anne R. Bunting The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board [] PlanniugDept. r-~ Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees [] (To be filed) Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital [] construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [] (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ZBA ~'~ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Seeking zoning variances for a) accessory structure in the required front yard; b) principal structure setback in the required front yard; c) principal structure in the required top-of-bluff setback; d) accessory structure in the required top-of-bluff setback. Includes removal of portion of existing structure. -13- Site acreage: 3.17 +/- acres Present land use: Single family residential Present zoning classification: R-120 If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Samuel W. Fitzgerald, architect (b) Mailing address: Sam Fitzgerald Architect, PC P.O. Box 447, The Gloaming, Fishers Island, NY 06390 (c) Telephone number: Area Code (). 860-287-3808 (d) Application number, if any:. Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ~ No [] If yes, which state or federal agency?. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, · preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrnstrncture, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] (Not Applicable - please explain) see LWRP Section 2es-3 (F)- minor LWRP actions are exempt The proposed action calls for removing a significant portion of the existing built structures on the property. The existing lot coverage will be reduced by 48%, and approx. 3,000 sq. ft. of new open space will be created on the property as a result of the proposed action. All disturbed areas will be graded to match the adjacent natural grade, and landscaped with native plantings. See LVVRP section 268-3(F) - LWRP minor actions are exempt Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes [] No ~-~ (Not Applicable - please explain) Soe L~P Section 268-3 (F)-minor LWRP actions are exempt The existing main house on the property was built in the 1920's but has suffered through many architecturally insensitive alterations over the years. It is our intention to remove as many of these later alterations as possible and restore the architectural integrity of the house. -14- Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] (Not Applicable - please explain) See LWRP Section 268-3 (F)- minor LWRP actions are exempt The view of the property from the water will be considerably improved by the proposed action because: a) a significant portion of the house and built structures on the property will be removed; b) the remaining house will be improved architecturally, and be of a much more appropriate scale; c) there will be no further encroachment on the bluff or in the direction of the water. From the street side,the existing house is fairly well screened from view, and will remain so. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No I~ (Not Applicable - please explain) See LWRP Section 268-3 (F)- minor LWRP actons are exempt The existing bluff is very stable and well vegetated, It rises 47' from beach to fiat buildable area at about a 26% slope. All proposed activity will be well above the Coastal Erosion Hazard line, and landward of the bluff line. The bluff will not be disturbed in any way and Will be protected with a silt fence and hay bale birder dudng all construction activity. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH -Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] (Not Applicable - please explain) See LWRp Section 268-3 (F)- minor LWRP actons are exempt The proposed action will decrease the amount of water run-off on the property, because we are significantly reducing the amount of roofed areas and built structures. In addition, all roof water will be directed into downspouts and into drywells, We are replacing a good portion of the existing built structures on the property with new planted areas, which will help with soil stabilization. The natural grade will not be modified in any way, so natural drainage courses will remained undisturbed. The owner is committed to being chemical-free in her lawn care. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section I11 - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No ~--~ (Not Applicable - see LWRP Section 268-3 (F) - minor LWRP actions are exempt -15- Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes r-~ No [-~ (Not Applicable - please explain) See LWRP Section 268-3 (F) - minor LWRP actions are exempt Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No [] (Not Applicable - please explain) See LWRP Section 268-3 (F) - minor LWRP actions areexempt PUBLIC COAST pOLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. [] Ye~ No [~ (Not Applicable - please explain) see LWRP Section 268-3 (F) - minor LWRP ac'dons are exempt WORKING COAST POLICIES -16- Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No [-~ (Not Applicable - please explain) See I.WRP Section 268-3 (F)- minor t. WRP acto~ are exempt Policy I1. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ['~ No ~ Not Applicable - please explain See I.~P Section 266-3 (F)- minor LWRP a~one are exempt Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No ~-~ Not Applicable - please explain see LV~P Section 268-3 (F) - minor L~RP actone afo e×empt Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No ~-~ Not Applicable - please explain See LWRP Section 268-3 (F)- minor LWRP actions are exempt -17- RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 Tele. No. (631) 734-6807 Fax No. (631) 734-5651 E-mail: LarkandFolts@aol.com RECEIVED FEB 8 2011 BOARD OF APPEALS February 3, 2011 Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Application - Anne Bunting (SCTM #1000-10-6-14.1) Dear Ms. Weisman: In connection with the above-captioned application, I am enclosing eight (~ sets of the following: 1. Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval dated 1/24/11. 2. Application for an Area Variance and Consent Form of Owner. 3. Survey dated 1-31-2011. 4. Building Diagrams. 5. Applicant's Project Description with labeled photos. 6. ZBA Questionnaire. 7. Agricultural Data Statement. 8. Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form of Owner and Agent. 9. Town of Southold Property Record Cards. 10. LWRP form. 11. Short Environmental Assessment Form. 12. Check payable to Town of Southold in the amount of $600.00 for the filing fee. If there is anything else you need, kindly give me a call. Enclosures Very truly yours, 26 January2011 Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Variance Application for 2427 Isabella Beach Road, Fishers Island, NY Dear Sir or Madam, I hereby give my consent to Samuel W. Fitzgerald, architect, and Richard F. Lark, attorney, to act as my agents and represent me in all matters regarding the variance application for the above referenced property, including signing the application on my behalf. Sincerely, Anne R. Bunting Owner, 2427 Isabella Beech Road, Fishers Island, NY r RECEIVED FEB 8 2011 BOARD OF APPEALS Agent: Samuel W. Fitzgerald, AIA The Gloaming P.O. Box 447 Fishers Island, NY 06390 T 860-287-3808 F 631-788-5647 Richard F. Lark, Esq. 28785 Main Road P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 T 631-734-6807 F 631-734-5651 - TOWN OF ~OUT~OLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-180'2 FAX: (631) 765-9502 SoutholdTown. NorthForknet Examm~ ,20 Approved ,2O Expiralion + 20 PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CI~KLIST Do you haw or need lhe folloWln~ befor~ applying? Board of H~llh 4 seis of Building Plans Pl~nmg Board approval S~ic Form 06390 Building Inspector ~'A'M ~9 ~..~l~ Date ~./~ ,20 ~be c~ ~apletely filled in by typewriter or m ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 s~ I of plecs, ~m to scale.]Fe~ according lo schedule. b. riot plao ~lovang l~etion of lot and of buildings on premise~, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and warn-ways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building perrmt. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premlse~ available for inapeotinn throughout the work. e. No beildin~ shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificale of Occupancy. F. Every building perlmt shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months al%r the dm of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months From such date. If no zoning amendments or other re~lafions affeot/ng the property have been enacted/n the inter/m, the Building Inspector may authorlze, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition s/x months. Themafle~, a new pernut shall be requital. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Departmect for the issuance oi' a Bailding Permit pursuant to the Buildin~ Zone Ordinance of the Town o£ Solithold, Suffolk County, l%w York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Re~ulabon% for the construotinn of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as heraln described. The applicant..~'ees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinm~ces, building code, hous/nl~ code, and regulations, and to admit (sis~ o~/~cht ~ ~-~ ifa CM~ili~g ed~:ess of applicant)' State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engin~r, general contractor, electrician, plumber m' builder (AJ on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicaut is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) FEB ~ 20~1 BuiMers License No. Z.~_'~,R~ Plumbers Lieeas¢ No. %C.~Sq Elautri¢iausLicauseNo. %5 ~ Othe~ Trade's Licause No. BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Location of laud on which proposed work will be done: House Non{bet Street Hamlet Cqunty 'fax Map No. 1000 S~'tion o, ~ Block L~ Lot [/4. I Subdiviiion II Filed Map No. { Lot -Z <g 2. State existing use and occupancy of promises and int~ded use and ocoupancy of proposed cons~: ii. Existing use and occupancy b. lntonded use and occupancy~_~, m ,,, o,~- 3. Nature of work (check which epplicable): New Building Repair Removal Demolition v/ 4. EstimatedCust I., ~oo~ ooc~ Fee 5. ff dwelling, number of dwelling units If garage, number of cam Z Add/lion x/ Alt~ati~ v/ Other Work (D~scription) (To I~ paid on filing this application) .Number of dwelling units on each floor 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimeesiunsofexisfings~ructures, ifany:Front ['g~/ Rear V'~' Depth Height %. o' Number of Stodes Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Depth c~' Height. '5o ' / a-'r ' Rear Number of Stories ~. 8. Dimansions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories ...* 9. Size oflot: From qz.l.t, 5' __Rear ~?.75' Depth 10. Date of Purchase ~ ~,//~-O' 0 Name of Former (~ll~r~ ~.., <.~ ~. ~ 12 Does osed coustruct~on ,aol ' · prop ' ' ateanyzonthgiaw, or ce or regulatiun? YES v/ NO 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO Will excess lill be removed from premises? YES NO V 1~. Names of Ova. er ofpiemises~,~oe~.,r ~-~,0~ Add, ss, phone No. .N. ameo~f~Architect~AddressH',ag~'-.~ [$[~_.~.o PhoncNo - 15 a. Is this property wflhin 100 feet ora tida~ wetland or a f~shwater wetland? *YES / NO * IF YES, $OUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS~ MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 f~t ora tidal wetland? * YES ~/ NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale., with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on properly is at 10 f~t or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. A~ there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this propc'~'ty? * YES__ NO * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF OF ,~8)S: ~r~,~.~ ~ COUNTY ?~lV[ll ~ ~1 ~'P~J~EvSld. being duly sworn, deposes aad says that (s)be is the applicant (Name of individual sig~ing contract) above named, ($)He is th~ (Contractor, Agent, Co,orate O~cea', etc.) of said owner or owners, aad is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all stat~meats contained in this applica~on a~¢ tree to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed ia the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. ~t Sig~ltdre [o f~[pplicant " SHE:ET ACTION OF TB~ ZON~M¢ BOARD OF AP IVED AND FILED Appeal No. 3047 Application gated October 8, 1982 Rudolph H. Bru~r, Esq. as attorney for Alexander Gaqton Main Road Southold, NY 11971 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on October 21t 1982 the abovm appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due ~o Lack of Accese to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Z~ing Ordinanc Article , Section IX] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-32 [ ] Request The public hearing on this appeal application was held on October 21, 1982. Upon application of ALEXANDER GASTON by Rudolph H. Sruer, Esq., Main Road, Southold, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct accessory etorage shed in the sideyard area. Location: Minor Subdivision of Sturges~ Map No. 144, Subd. Lots 1 and ;2~ Private Road~ Fishers Island, ~Y; County T~k Map Parcel No. 1000-10-6-13.1~nd ~4.1. The board made the following findings and determination: By this appeal, appellant seeks permission to construct a 12' by 12' accessory etorage ehed for the purposes of etoring garden implements in the sideyard area as shown on the April 20, 1982 plan prepared by Chand- ler, Palmer & King. The premises in question has an area of 5.14 acres, more or less slightly and is located in the A-Residential and Ag'ricultural District. Existing on the premises is a large dwelling with its face towards Block Island Sound. The board agrees that the relief as re- quested will be in conformity with the area. In considering this appeal, the board determines the variance request will not cause detriment to adjoining properties; that the circumstances herein are unique; that the difficulty cannot be obviated by a method, feasible to appellants, other than a variance; that no adverse effects will be produced on available governmental facilities of any increased population; that the relief requested will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes of zoning; and that the interests of justice will be served by allowing the variance as indicated below. On motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Messrs. Grigonis and Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that Appeal No. 3047, application for ALEXANDER GASTON for an accessory storage building in the sideyard area, he and~ ~ereby IS APPROVED AS APPLIED FOR. Location of Property: Minor Subdivision of "Sturges," Lots 1 and 2; County Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-10-6-13.1 and 14.1. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was unanimously adopted. DATED: November 6, 1982. CHAIP44AN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONI~ BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PR~OPERTY RECORD CARD ~--- J STREET J vILLAGE .l DIST..! couNTYTAxMAPNO~ I.AND IMP. TOTAL DATE I~EMARKS: 10.-6-14.1 Foundation Ext. Walls :- ~ C~,~," ~..CPO Patio Place ~,~ Porch pOrch Floors Interior Finish Heat .- ~ Attic ]st Floor Rooms 2nd Floor OWNER ~TREET VILLAGE 'DIST. SUB. LOT ACR. REMARKS TYPE OF BLD. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE FRONTAGE ON WATER ,~'7'.+ T,LLAB.E FRONTAGE ON ROAD 1 4~'J'~ WOODLAND DEPTH 15~'"~ t MEAOOWLAND BULKHEAD HOUSE/LOT TOTAL ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE, RMC, CMC TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: DATED: RE: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Elizabeth A. Neville February 10, 2011 Zoning Appeal No. 6455 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 6455of Samuel W. Fitzgerald for Anne R. Bunting - the Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Also enclosed is the Applicant's Project Description, Questionnaire, agricultural Data Statement, Short Environmental Assessment Form, Transactional Disclosure Form, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Cover Sheet from Lark & Folts Dated February 3,2011, Authorization Letter from Anne R. Bunting to Samuel W. Fitzgerald and Richard F. Lark to Represent her in this Matter, Copy of Application for Building Permit with Disapproval Dated January 24, 2011 with Copy of Survey Dated December 14, 2010 Attached, Copy of Notice of Disapproval Dated January 24, 2011, Copy of Action of the Zoning Board of Appeals No 3047 Dated October 8, 1982 for Alexander Gaston, 3 Pages of Copy of Property Record Card, Copy of Survey Showing Existing & Proposed Construction Dated January 31,2011 Prepared by CME Engineering, 14 Pages Site Plans, Photos of Existing & Proposed Construction and Floor Plans by Sam Fitzgerald Architect PC. Town of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: 02/10/11 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt~: 97518 Transaction(s): 1 1 Application Fees Reference Subtotal 6455 $600.00 Check Total Paid: $600.00 Name: Bunting, Ann 2427 Isabella Beach Rd Fishers Island, NY 06390 Clerk ID: CAROLH Internal ID: 6455 ZBA TO TOWN CLERK TRANSMITTAL SHEET (Filing of Application an~ Check for Processing) DATE: 2/9/11 ZBA # NAME CHECK # AMOUNT TC DATE STAMP RECEIVED 510474522- 6455 Bunting, Anne 8 $600.00 FEB 1 0 2011 20?5 2 &Gl,,' BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ken Schneider Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor. Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.north fork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 20tl PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on TH URSDAY~ APRIL 7~ 2011: 9:30 AM - ANNE R. BUNTING #6455 - Request for Variance from Art. XXll Code Section 280-116A(1), Art. XXlII Section 280-14 and Art. III Section 280-15F and the Building Inspector's January 24, 2011 Notice of Disapproval based on a building permit application for additions & alterations to existing dwelling and construction of an accessory structure at; 1) at less than the code required setback of 100 feet from the top of bluff, 2) Accessory structure at less than the code required setback of 100 feet from the top of bluff, 3) less than the code required front yard setback of 60 feet, 4) accessory structure at less than the code required front yard setback of 60 feet on water front property at: 2427 Isabella Beach Rd.,(adj. to Block Island Sound) Fishers Island, NY. SCTM#1000-10-6-t4.1 and 11- t-7.5. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. If you have questions, please contact our office at (631) 765-1809, or by email: Vic ki.Tot h(~,Town. South old.ny.us. Dated: March 7, 2011 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Vicki Toth 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAILING ADDRESS and PLACE OF HEARINGS: 53095 Main Road, Town Hall Building, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 Fax 765-9064 LOCATION OF ZBA OFFICE: Town Hall Annex at North Fork Bank Building, 1st Floor 54375 Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold website: http://southtown.northfork.net March 7, 2011 Re: Town Code Chapter 55 -Public Notices for Thursday, April 7, 2011 Hearing Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of the Times Review newspaper. 1) Before March 21st: Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a Cover Letter including your telephone number and a copy of your Survey or Site Plan (filed with this application) which shows the new construction area or other request, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed), vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. Use the current owner name and addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Southold Town Assessors' Office, or Real Property Office at the County Center, Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable, you are requested to make other attempts to obtain a mailin.q address or to deliver the letter to the current owner, to the best of your ability, and to confirm how arran.qements were made in either a written statement, or durin.q the hearinR, providin.q the returned letter to us as soon as possible; AND not later than March 28th: Please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of Mailing (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, names and addresses noted, along with the green/white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. When the green signature cards are returned to you later by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us before the scheduled hearing. If any envelope is returned "undeliverable", please advise this office as soon as possible. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board during the hearing and provide the card (when available). These will be kept in the permanent record as proof of all Notices. 2) Not Later March 30th: Please make arrangements to place the enclosed Poster on a signboard such as cardboard, plywood or other material, posting it at the subject property seven (7) days (or more) prior to hearing. (It is the applicant/agents responsibility to maintain sign until Public Hearing) Securely place the sign on your property facing the street, not more than 10 feet from the front property line bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both front yards. Please deliver or mail your Affidavit of Postin,q for receipt by our office before April 5th, 2011. If you are not able to meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. Thank you for your cooperation. (PLEASE DISPLAY YOUR HOUSE NUMBER ALWAYS). Very truly yours, Zoning Appeals Board and Staff Encls. NOTIC OF HEARING The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold: NAME BUNTING, ANNE #6455 MAP # 10-6-14.1 VARIANCE SETBACKS REQUEST ADDITIONS/ALTERATIONS DATE: THURS, APRIL 7, 2011 9:30 AM If you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM. ZONING BOARD-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 765-1809 10161 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1__ week(s), successively, commencing on the 24th day of March, 2011. Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this , day of LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TH URSDAY APRIL 7, 2011 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, put- Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning),Town of Southold, the following public bear- ings will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF AP- PEALS at the Town Hall. 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on ~ XXII Code Section 280-116A(1), Art. prove[ based on a building permit ap- Isabella Beach Rd,(adj. to Block Island Sound) Fishers Island, NY. SCTMgl000- 10'.40 a.m.; JAMES and KAREN ~ - Request for Variance from Art. XXIII Code Section 280 124 and the Building Inspector's December 16, 2010 Notice of Disapproval based i on an application for building permit to construct accessory in-grouod swim- ming pooI and pool house at; lot cov- erage of more than the code required 20%, at: 2855 Laurel Trail Laurel, NY, SCrM#1000-125-4.24.q. ~ a.m.. DAISy M. FOLK ~450 - This is a request for a Waiver of Merg~ er under Article II, Section 280-10A, to unmerge land identified as SCTM g1000-59-6-I0, based on the Building Inspector's December 16, 2010 Notice of Disapproval, which states adjoining nonconforming lots held in common ownership shall merge until the total Ioi size conforms to the current bulk schedule (minimum 40,000 square feet in this R40 Residential Zone District) this lot is merged with lot 1L Property located at; 7599 & 7475 Soundview Ave. (adj. to 2 Private Rds.) Southold, NY. 11'.20 a.m.. #AMES CONNQLI;V ~6454 - Request for Variance from Arti- cle XXlll Code Section 280-124 and thc Building Inspector's February 4. 21)11 Notice of Disapproval based on a build- ing permit application for porch addi lion to existing dwelling at; at less than the code required front yard setback of 50 feet, at: 5575 Sound Ave., Mattduck, 11:40 a.m. - .lAMES and KATH. for Variance from Art. XXiI Code Sec- tion 28(I-116 and section 280-15 and the Building Inspector's January 19, 2011 Notice of Disapproval based on an ap- plication fqr building permit to construct accessory m-ground swimming pool and existing shed at; 1) bulkhead setback of less than the code required 75 feet for the pool. 2) location other than the code required rear yard for the shed at: 415 Harbor Lights Dr. (ad, to creek or ca- nal), Southo d, NY. SCTMgl000-71-24. ,,~OTAR¥ PUBL~C..STATE 0,~ NEW YOR8 No. fi! .V©6105050 .~u,~ii;ied in Suffolk County 1~:00 mm. - NORTH FORK COM- MUNll~ THEATER ~ - Request for Varlancc from Afl. III Code Section 28046 and the Building Inspector's De- cember 1. 2010, Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building pet- mit for lot line change at; 1) lot size less than the code required 20,000 sq. fl. per Bulk schedule in HB District, 2) less than the code required rear yard setback of 25 feet, 3) less than the code required side yard setback of 10 feet. at: 12700 Sound Ave. and 12605 Main Rd..Malthuck,NY. SCTM#1{XXM 41-4-26& 32.1. Carryover Hearings, continued Irom prior meetings and pending adddkma] information: Adjourned from Public Hearing Feb- mary 3, 2011: 1.-00 n.m. - 1RENE RUTKOSKI ES- The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives, desir- ing to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available tot review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. 11 you have questions, please contact our office at (631) 765-1809, or by email: Vicki.Tot h@Town. Sout hold.n y. us. Dated: March 7, 2011 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE FANES WEISMAN, CHAIR- PERSON BY: Vlcld Toth 54375 Main Road (Off-ace Location) 53095 Main Road (Medlng/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 ~PPEAb NO. 6455 - R. Bunting 1000-010.00-06.00-001.002C~ 2,o3,,,"~' c~, "fl Postage I Endorsement Requirod} ~2, ~ ' Restricted Delive~ Fee ~tal Postage & Fees $ $5.~ ~sabella Beach Ltd. Partnership 1000-010.00-06.00-001.025 m Postage Certiflnd Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Deliver~ Fee $2.30 $0.00 $ S5.54 Susan I. Cook ~rP~o~o~ 782 Route 9-D c~sl~iE~;¥ .................................................................. Garrison, NY 10524 1000-010.00-06.00-013. 001 Certified Fee ~..80 Return Receipt Fee (Eedorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee F (Endorsement Required) Lisa K. Howlett I c"y's~m'~+~Pelham Manor, NY 10803 I '" ' Page 1 of 2 APPEA% NO. 6455 - R. 1000-011.00-01.00-007.00~ Bunting c~ [i F.I. Development Co b'" '; .... er ~ · . ' Fishers Island, NY 0639~ ........ ~ Page 2 of 2 APPEAL NO. 6455 - R. Bunting 1000-010.00-06.00-001.002 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also COmplete item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. · Prf~ your name and address on the reveme so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: ~sabella Beach Ltd. Partnership 712 S. Newport Ave. %~mpa, FL 33606 [] Agent I-I Addressee B. Received b C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from item 1 ? [] Yes if YES, enter delivery address below: [] NO PS Form 3P1 ~ .~-,,, ~, v ?004 [] Express Mail [] Registered r'l Return Receipt for Merchandise [] insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Ye~ 7006 0100 0004 4071 5528 Domestic Return Recelpt 102595-02-M-1540 1000-010.00-06.00-001. 025 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired. · Print your name and address on the reveme so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: [] Agent J b C. Date of Delivery D. Is deliver, address different from item 17 [] Yes If YES, enter delNe~ address below: [] No Susan I. Cook 782 Route 9-D · Garrison, NY 10524 2. Article Number (Transfer from se/vice label) 3. Service Type ~ Certified Mall I-I Express Mail ["1 Registered [] Retem Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Dal[very? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 0100 0004 4071 5535 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 1000-010.00-06.00-013. 001 Page 1 of 2 APPEAL NO. 6455 - mo 1000-011.00-01.00-007.002 Bunting · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. AJso complete item 4 If Rest~cted Delivery is desired. · Prfnt your name and address on the reveme so that we can return the card to you, · Attach this card to the back of the mairpiece, or on the front if space perm[ts. t. Article Addressed to: ;F.I. Development Corp. · ATTN: F.I. Utility Co. Drawer E Fishers Island, ~ 06390 A. Signature -, [] Addressee C, Date of Dalivet7 m item 17 r-i Yes ~ below: [] No 3. Sea, ice Type ~ Certified Mail [] Express Mall [] Registered [] Retum Receipt for Memhandlse [] Insured Mall [] C.O.D, 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2. A~icle Number (Transfer from se~ice label) 7010 1670 0002 1168 8390 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595~)2-M-1540 UO/~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of (Name of Applicants) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as SCTM Parcel #1000- 10-6-14.1 and 1000-11-1-7.5 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, ~Wlqfv4.,- k]. '~~ residing at ~'l ~qVlb~' ~j~-'~ ~40~'A'O~'I"~---I ("1' , N~:od~, being duly sworn, depose and say that: Onthe I~'~t dayof ~4~ ,2011 , I personally placed the Town's Official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon my property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of'- way (driveway entrance) - facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven (7) days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be Sworn to before me this ~)~'~'hDay of/~d'£d;~ , 201! / (Notary Public) * near the ~driveway entr~mce of~ny property, as the area most visible to passerby. BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio Gerard 1~ Goehringer George Homing Ken Schneider http://southoldtown.north fork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 February 9,2011 Southotd Town Hall 53095 Main Road · 1~O. Box 1179 Southold, NY t 1971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 2011 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #6455 (Bunting) Dear Mr. Terry: We have received an application for additions and alterations to existing single family dwelling as well as, construction of an accessory structure on Fishers Island. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson Encls. BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio Gerard E Goehringer George Homing Ken Schneider Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First lqoor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTItOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 February 9,2011 Mr. Thomaslsles, Director Suffolk County Departmentof Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Mr. Isles: Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: ZBA File #6455 Action Requested: Within 500 feet of: Owner/Applicant: Barry, Joyce & Robert Additions/Alterations & construct accessory structure ( ) State or County Road (X) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. ( ) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Encls. Leslie K. Weisman ZBA Chairperson BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio Gerard R Goehringer George Homing Ken Schneider http://southoldtown.north fork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · PO. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 February 9, 2011 Suflblk County Soil and Water Conservation District 423 Griffing Ave., Suite 110 Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 6455 (Bunting) Dear Sir or Madam: We have received an application for a project adjacent to Block Island Sound on Fishers Island, NY, and shown on the enclosed site map. The hearing on this application is expected to be held in approximately 6 weeks. Enclosed is a copy of the site map, together with the application and a copy of the area map. May we ask for you assistance in an evaluation and recommendations for this proposal. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson Encls. BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio, Jr. Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ken Schneider Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.north fork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTItOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 April 21,2011 Samuel W. Fitzgerald, Architect P.O. Box 447, The Gloaming Fishers Island, NY 6390 Re: ZBA File#6455, Bunting Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: Transmitted for your records is a copy of the Board's April 20, 2011 Findings, Deliberations and Determination, the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above application for variances. Before commencing any construction activities, a building permit is necessary. Please be sure to submit an application along with a copy of this determination to the Building Department. If you have any questions, please call the office. Sincer~,y,~ ~ Vicki Toth Encl. Cc: Building Dept. 85o55'20" ~ 117.00' -- DETACH THIS PORTION FROM EXISTING HOUSE EXTEND EXISTING DECK AS SHOWN ROOFED PORTION OF PROPOSED DECK. PROPOSED ONE-STORY FRAME ADDITIONS-- LINE OF EXISTING BUILDING -BLUFF ARD ~ING ADDITION IS WITHIN EXISTING, BUILDING FOOTP~i'NT ISTING DECK STRUCTURE TO REMAIN. NEW DECK BOARDS 2.33' OF EXlSTING ROOFED PORCH TO REMAIN AND BE REPAIRED ^ PROPOSED BLUESTONE 9.5' TERRACE PROPOSED SCREENED PORCH TO FIT UNDER EXISTING FLAT PORCH ROOF. EXISTING SETBACK FROM TOP-OF-BLUFF TO REMAIN. UNDULATING THATCH ROOF OR GREEN ROOF. OLD BOARDS OR DRIFT WOOD. ROUGH HEWN TIMBERS OR NATURAL LOGS~~IFT W0~.D~. FEB g Z01i DETAILS OF PROPOSED PERGOLA BOARD OF APPEALS 2*2 t,4 NOTICE .,.~----t~--~--q))~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK '",NTE,~CE. ALTE,~rlO~S*L[O, I~¢~%~Reol Properly lox Service SOUTHOLD SECTION NO 1000 PROPERTY MAP / / / / ~ ~ WELL / / / ~>' ~ "=400' ~ / / ~' ~ ......... , ~ / ~ /¢- . ........ LOCATION MAP SCALE 1 /// ~ /~/~ ~ ~% ~ 'k% ~ 1,) SUBDIVISION P~N PROPER~ OF ALICE S, STURGIS; FISHERS IS~ND, TOWN t ~' ~-,-, / / / / k _ oD..,, ,,,,,, I / / ~ / x < / / .~'~ ~ / / / ~ ~ ~ ~ 4,} COASTAL EROSION H~ARD AREA MAP, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK / / / /~~~ . ~ No,55-861-88 BATEB 08,29,88 PREPARED BY THE NEW YORK STATE / / / ,' %~ ~/ / / / /~~ ~ __, ~ , ~.. ~ ~ ~¢ ~ / / / / ~ HEEEDN. ANY E~ENSION OF THE USE B~OND THE PURPOSED AGREED TO Z '~~EiN ,E~ 5~ 2,) E IS A VIO~TION OF THE STATE EDUCATION ~W FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS / ~ ~ ~) / SIGNATURE AND AN ORIGINAL EMBOSSED OR INK S~L ARE rile PRODUCT OF / m~u Z ~D .~,~ Z F~SHE~S iS~ND, NY 06~90 PHONE ~(860) 287-5808 ..... ~ ._,~ / ROOF AR~ = 2,178 SF I ..... ~ ~ / REQUIRED = 2,178 SF X 1,0 X 2/12 = 36~ CF ; TOP or BLUFF-~ I . % 0¢4I¢~LTER ~ ........ FILTER REQUIRED - 751 SF X 1,0 X 2/12 = 125.17 CF / ''. ' ~ ~ FABRIC~ ~ ....... ~ FABRIC~ 125,17 CF / 50.27 CF~F = 2,5 VF '.. ~ ~ ; POST ~ ~ ,, ~ N . USE ONE(l) - 8'¢ X 4' DEEP DRY WELL. FOR STABIU~ AN~ ~ .. ~ ~ ROCKY B~CH S~LF BLEANING AYBa B I ....... ~ I NOT TO SCALE ~ WATER ~ ,',"~ ~ EXISTING BUILDING RECEIVED/ ~t~ I o~co~ TO REMAIN El~ EL~ATiON j ~ ~ N , 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ m H,-2,2~F)~[~ / TO BE DEMOLISHED DATE: JAN. 31, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~cE~ r*~c% / / / / / / / / / //, ~ PROPOSED CONTOURS OF APPEA ,O'~N~~ ~ ~ ~ ~-- PROPOSED BUILDING ~ EXISTING BRUSHUNE BOARD SCALE: 1 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 ~' s.~ ~s,~ ~ e ~ 0 ~ e ~ AODITIONS ---~- BUILDING SETBACK LINE ~ ~ o ~ · e ~ X J5.8 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION S~EENED ~A~L --- AND PERGO~ A A A EXISTING WOOD R~AINING WALL SHEET VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=20' ¢ ~ s' J r ' ~* *1" "l" "1" "1' PROPOSED SILT FENCE W/HAYBALES ~ '" - 1 OF1 QUALI~ CONTROL CERTIFICATION .ct ~o sC~E ~ STONE WALL GROUP R~I~ED D~ APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLE) TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS FOR: 2427 ISABELLA BEACH ED FISHERS ISLAND, NY SCTM 1000- Section 10 Block 6 Lot 14.1 Section 11 Block 1 Lot 7.5 PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED IN THIS APPLICATION: PROPOSED BLUESTONE TERRACE ,~RT ~._E XXli _,,~,..Tk. N z8 .... PROPOSED PERGOLA ARTCLEXX ~.~V ON PROPOSED DECK EXTENSION ARTiSLE XX!ii SECTION 28C !4 PROPOSED CREATION OF A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ~RT_LE iii 3E~ bh ZUL-i3r TABLE OF CONTENTS 1-2 Aerial Views of Existing Prope~y 3 Site Plan - Existing 4 Site Plan - Demolition 5 Site Plan - Proposed Design 6 Photos of Building Area 7-9 3D Views, Existing & Proposed 10 Photo Montage of Pergola Area 11-13 Existin9 & Proposed Fioor Plans SAM F~L ~RALB EXISTING CONDITIONS ,:~IEW F~M SOUTH Z' EXISTING CONDITIONS · ~IEW FROM NO 'RTH 1 ? / 1 1 I l / ? f / ? t I ELECTRIC VAULt? ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER SITE P~N SCALE: 1/16" = TO" EXISTING CONDITIONS PinUP AREA BOARD ~/; ,'~?PEALS EXBTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED EXISTING BUILDINGS TO REMAIN EXISTING DECKS, RETAINING WALLS AND ALL SITE WORK TO 8E REMOVED SITE DEMOLfflON PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = EXISTING SHED TO REMAIN -~-- \ STONE PARKING AREA O0 C 0 iOF Cz REMOVE BXtSTING BATH HOUSE / STORAGE BLDG, \ REMOVE EXISTING PUMP ENCLOSURE PiOL ~.~o~ (NOT VAUL~ DETACH THIS PORTION OF EXISTING HOUSE THIS EXISTING DECK STRUC1 URE TO REMAIN AND BE REPAIRED, OF EXISTING ROOFED PORCH ~TO REMAP, J) '~ REMOVE ALL EXISTING DECKS AROUND NOUSE REPLACE WITH NEW / / TERRACE AND DECKS PER .,"'" / PROPOSED PLAN /:'"' x%E-----~'~' EXISTING FLAT PORCR ROOF / TO REMAIN AND BE REPAIRED / % / PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION WITHIN FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING HOUSE PROPOSED SCREENED PORCH OR STRUCTURE B~qSTiNG BUILDING TO REMAIN PROPOSED SITE SCALE: 1/!6" = 1'-0" EXISTING SNED 'TO STONE PARKING AREA ROOFED PORTION OF PROPOSED DECK PROPOSED ONE-STORY F~AMEADE LiNE OF EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT ...... ,~. :-,_LC I R C TRANSFC R!vlLR I--" "-HtS :~ORTION OF NEW ,XDDFrION IS WF EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROPOSED ONE-STORY SCREENED PERGOLA-- DETACH -[HIS PORTION FROM EXISTING HOUSE EXTEND EXISTING DECK AS SHOWN ~,..~! .......... EXISTING DECK STRUCTURE ', 'l O REMAIN. NEW DECK BOARDo "2,33' //----- LINE OF EXISTING ROOFED PORCH TO REMAIN AND BE REPA!REO ROPOSED BLUESTONE TERRACE PROPOSED SCREENED ~:IORCH TO FiT UNDER EXISTING FLA [ PORCF :~OOF. EXIST NG SETBACK FROM TOP,OF~BI UFF TO ~EMAIN 11/02/10 0/27/10 10/27/10 10/27/10 SHADING INDICATES AREAS OF EXISTING BUILT STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED. EXISTING HOUSE - VIEW FROM EAST EXISTING SOLARIUM DECK POOL STORAGE BUILDING AND ALL RELATED CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED CREATION OF A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ARTICLE [ SEC]ION 280 5F PROPOSED PERGOLA ARTCLEXXi 5ECTOIx28(~ 16A ) SCREENED PORCH TO FIT UNDER EXISTING FLAT ROOF PROPOSED DESIGN NO FO SCALE PROPOSED BLUESTONE TERRACE PROPOSED DECK EXTENSION EXISTING HOUSE NOT TO SCALE VIEW FROM WEST PROPOSED DESIGN NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED ---~--_ ~-. "Ir' PROPOSED ~.~O,A.. EXISTING SOLARIUM, DECK, POOL, .~[~ ! ~ Z~ PROPOSED ONE STORY AD[ EXISTING SOLARIUM, DECK, POOL, STORAGE BUILDING AND ALL RELATED CONSTF TO BE REMOVED ~ /' NEW BLUESTONE ,, ~ , ~ PROPO~E~ ~E~GN ~o~o~ NOTTO SCALE EXISTING HOUSE VIEW FROM SOUTH NOT TO SCALE EXISTING PROPOSED EX~STING FIRST FLOOR SCA~ E: 1/8'~ = I'0~ PDA, N EXTERIOR COVERED PORC ~ FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION ~CALE 8 - ( ON DEMOLITION PLAN SHADED AREAS ARE THOSE PORTIONS OF EXISTING HOUSE TO REMAIN. AL_ OTHER EXISTING CONSTRUCTION 'TO BE REMOVED. PLAN EXiSTiNG SECOND a~ALE: 1,,8 ~ X FLOOR P~N EXISTING INTERIOR SPACE EXTERIOR COVERED PORCH EXTERIOR DECK ON DEMOLITION PLAN, SHADED AREAS ARE THOSE PORTIONS OF EXISTING HOUSE TO REMAIN. ALL OTHER EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED, SECOND FLOOR DEMOLITION P~N SCALE: !/8" ~- 1'0" !}QAI<D GF A / / EXISTING COVERED PORCHES NEW COVERED PORCHES NEW ON E,-,STORY ADDFFJONS NEW DECKS & TERRACES PROPOSED SCALE: 1/8'~ = I'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED ~JCALE: 1/8" ' SECOND FLOOR PtJ~N