The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-122.-6-12APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ? Southold To 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 REPLY MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman August 16, 2001 Your Inquiry Received July 23, 2fi01 (Tqorth Shore Yacht Sales) 1000-122-6-12 at Mattituck In reply to your inquiry regarding the above property, the ZBA finds no specific changes of Special Exception granted on May 5, 1999. The improvements proposed on the map attached with your letter will at all times be required to meet the same conditions of the 1999 Special Exception, Appl. No. 4681, when the new building is completed. 3outhold ?own SubmLs. sion Wilhoul a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE October 31, 2001 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Yan Rieger, Orient Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED. to APPRO~/E the MINUTES of the meeting of October 18, 2001. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. NORTH SHORE YACHTS (Main Road - Mattituck This application had been approved ~zith conditions at the meeting of October 11, 2001. Inasmuch as not all conditions had been met,_namel¥ an additional copy of the plans for endorsement and.~h~ ¢.(~lr~r of the mQf aqd fascia it was moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Yan Rieger to AUTHORIZE Garrett Strang to APPROVE the application on behalf of the Committee. p,/~a,,r.2 ~ ~F~__ r~ ~ ¢' ~. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Robert W. Keith Secretary. L SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE October 31, 2001 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Yan Rieger, Orient Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of October 18, 2001. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. NORTH SHORE YACHTS (Main Road - Mattituck) This application had been approved with conditions at the meeting of October 11, 2001. Inasmuch as not all conditions had been met, namely an additional copy of the plans for' endorsement and the color of the roof and fascia, it was moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Yan Rieger to AUTHORIZE Garrett Strang to APPROVE the application on behalf of the Committee. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Robert W, Keith Secretary, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCt-IIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Valerie Scopaz, AICP, Town Planner October 24, 2001 North Shore Yacht Sales SCTM#1000-112-6-12 Please review drainage for the proposed building. VS:ck Att. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Garrett Strang, Chairman, Architectural Review Committee Valerie Scopaz, AICP, Town Planner October 24, 2001 North Shore Yacht Sales SCTM#1000-112-6-12 Please review the attached revised plans and determine if they are in accordance with your recommendations. VS:ck WARREN A. SAMBACH, SR. CONSULTING ENGINEERS . PLANNERS 7675 COX LANE - P*O* BOX 1033 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 6 3 1 -- (~I~_) 734 7492 File No: 801 October 22 2001 Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Plannin9 Board Town of Southold 53095 State Road 25 Southold NY 11971 Re: P.O. Box 1179 North Shore V'~cht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck NY 11952 SCTM 1000-122-6-11 Mr. Kassner: OCT 2001 ;outhc! row? Enclosed are four (4) sets of revised plans for the above, as per your letter of October 16, 2001. Sincerely, Warren A. Sambach Sr. P.E. was:s cc: Michael Hughes, North Shore Yacht Sales SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE October 11, 2001 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Howard G. Meinke, New Suffolk/Cutchogue Theodore Carpluk, Southold Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary $outhold Town Planning Board Aisc attending were Robert C. Kassner of the Planning Board staff and Warren Samboch for North Fork Yachts Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of August 14, 2001. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. NORTH SHORE YACHT (Main Road - Mattituck) Moved by Theodore Carpluk and seconded by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the plans with the CONDITIONS that the roof pitch over the enclosed area be 5 x12, over the open area be 2 x 12, that the vinyl siding on the south elevation match the existing color and that the metal on the other three sides approximate the vinyl, that the roof color approximate the color of the existing asphalt roof, that the fascia be white and that revised plans be submitted in duplicate to reflect these changes. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY (Main Road ~ Greenport) Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the application awaiting roof and siding colors, details of store front entry, a drawing of the east elevation, catalogue cuts of exterior lighting fixtures (building-mounted as well as free standing), signage, details of the rolldown gate at the check out and locations of the mechanicals and roof penetrations. It is suggested that the roof pitches on both storage buildings be 2 x 12 and that casings, and perhaps grill work, be used with the windows on the west and north elevations. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. PLANNING BOA_RD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATI-LkM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 16, 2001 Michael Hughes North Shore Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 North Shore Yacht Sales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-12 Dear Mr. Hughes, This letter is further to our letter to you of July 18, 2001, copy enclosed. The following additions/changes must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: 1. Pave access road and both parking areas. Place transition buffer at southwest side of property adjacent to the Low Density Residential (R-40) Zone. The plantings should be placed from the gate south to the twenty-five foot front yard landscaped area. The Board recommends Pampas Grass for the buffer screening. 3. Revised elevation drawings as discussed with your agent, Warren Sambach, at the Architectural Review Committee Meeting of October 11,2001. In addition to the above, review is required by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the New York State Department of Transportation. Please be advised that no possible final approval can be granted before the boats are removed from the twenty five foot front yard landscaped area and any boats stored in the rear Residential area. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer Encl. Cc: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 July 18, 2001 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Michael Hughes North Shore Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Matfituck, NY 11952 North Shore Yacht Sales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-11 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received your letter of July 12, 2001 and revised site plan. The following additions/changes must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: 1. Parking calculations must be corrected The combined existing and proposed requirements for parking are fifteen (15) spaces. 2. The boat display & storage area appears to show Parking spaces, the two southern spaces do not have the required twenty two (22) feet of back up space. Is this area for parking or for boat storage? 3. One of the ZBA conditions was a fence around the entire property. This fence is not shown around the entire property. 4. Parking area should be paved. Your elevation drawings will be reviewed by the Architectural Review Committee. The boats in the front yard landscaped area and in the residential portion of your property must be removed , /' If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer Cc: Warren Sambach Sr. WARREN A. SAMBACH, SR. CONSULTING ENGtNEERS- PLANNERS 7675 COX LANE · P.O. BOX 1033 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 63 1 -- XE~[734-7492 File No: 801 September 25 2001 Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 State Road 25 Southold NY 11971 Re: North Shore Yacht Sales Hain Road Mattituck NY 11952 SCTM 1000-122-6-11 Plann[ o Bo [ds Mr. Kassner: Enclosed are four (4) copies of the following with reference to the above: Plot Plan, Dwg. 1 of 4 showing parking for sixteen (16) spaces. Fence around entire property. Request gravel for parking areas as self draining,other areas around Town have gravel for small parking areas. Floor Plan and South Elevation, 3 of 4 showin~ new elevation of 5/12 roof pitch. This new pitch increases the heighth of the proposed building which will be more conspicuous from Route 25. Siding on the South Elevation to match existing. Siding on the North, East and West Elevations to be vertical siding as these sides will not be seen as they are behind the existing building. We respectfully request reconsideration be given by the Architectural Review Committee with reference to the 5/12 pitch and siding. (The 2/12 pitch is shown very lightly on the elevation. September 25 Sincerely, 2 2001 arren A. Sambach Sr. P.E. cc: North Shore Yacht Sales JEAN W. COCHRAN JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAiN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516) - 765 - 1366 Tel. (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August24,2001 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: North Shore Yachts Main Road, Mattituck SCTM #: 1000-122-06-12 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the revised plans for the above referenced project. The plans submitted for this project have been prepared by Warren A. Sambach, Consulting Engineers, and had a revision date of July 5, 2001. This revised plan has addressed the issues that were listed in my previous report dated 4/20/01, regarding the drainage calculations. A test hole has been included with the revisions to the plan indicating suitable soil conditions that will enable the proposed drainage systems to function properly. The drainage calculations have also been modified to include all of the proposed development within the scope of work for this project. The proposed drainage design for the above referenced project, as revised, meets the minimum requirements of the Town Code. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. Sincerely,/q . .,ames A. Richter, R.A. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Homing BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town I~a~ 53095 Main Road RO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 REPLY MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer ~ j Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman August 16, 2001 Your Inquiry Received July 23, 2~I)1 (North Shore Yacht Sales) 1000-122-6-12 at Mattituek In reply to your inquiry regarding the above property, the ZBA finds no specific changes of Special Exception granted on May 5, 1999. The improvements proposed on the map attached with your letter will at all times be required to meet the same conditions of the 1999 Special Exception, Appl. No. 4681, when the new building is completed. $outholfl Town Planning Board PLANNING BO.~-~tD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 August 3, 2001 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Michael Hughes North Shore Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 North Shore Yacht Sales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-11 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received and approved the enclosed report from the Architectural review Committee. The report is being sent to you for your attention. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer Cc: Warren Sambach Sr. SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE July'J/,r 2001, 4:30 P.M. The ARC met at Town Hall, Members present were: Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Herbert Ernst, Southold Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Howard Meineke, Cutchogue Yah Reiger, Orient Also present were Robert Kassner of the Planning Board staff and Edwin A. Tonyes of Southold Automotive. Moved by Howard Meineke and seconded by Herbert Ernst, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of July 19, 2001 Vote of the Committee: Ayes All AU{ 0 1 2001 Southold Town Planning Board NORTH SHORE YACHT (Main Road - Mattituck) MovedbY Howard Meinke and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE' the application awaiting the requested South elevation showing both buildings to see the visual impact of the new building. The Committee will also look for a more barn-like appearance such as a 5 x 12 roof pitch and siding to match or complement the existing building. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Secretary recommend that the Planning Board DENY the application as submitted and ask for resubmission because the nature of design,- parapet walls, acrylic stucco, and length of the building - in no way follow the phitosophy of the scenic by-way proposed for Route 48. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. NORTH SHORE YACHT (Main Road - Mattituck) Moved by Howard Meinke and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the application awaiting the requested South elevation showing both buildings to see the visual impact of the new building. The Committee will also look for a more barn-like appearance such as a 5 x 12 roof pitch and siding to match or complement the existing building. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. WAREX TERMINAL CONVENIENCE STORE (Main Road - Mattituck) Moved by Herbert Ernst and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the application to secure information about the color and material of the storefront construction, including any opaque panels and the details of the signage. The Committee recommends removal of the fluted wooden columns and continuance of the brick across the front at the height below the Cashier's window. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. ~ ~.L0 I~. Rob~ W. Keith Secretary SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE July ~2001, 4:30 P.M. The ARC met at Town Hall, Members present were: Robed I. Brown, Co-Chairman Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Herbed Ernst, Southold Robed Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Howard Meineke, Cutchogue Yan Reiger, Orient Also present were Robed Kassner of the Planning Board staff and Edwin A. Tonyes of Southold Automotive. Moved by Howard Meineke and seconded by Herbed Ernst, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of July 19, 2001 Vote of the Committee: Ayes All Southold Town Planning Board SOUTHOLD AUTOMOTIVE (Main Road - Southold) Moved by Robed Brown and seconded by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED to decline comment after-the-fact on construction not in conformance with approved plans; fudher to add the following condition to each approval: "Deviation from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recisssion of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Cedificate of Occupancy" Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. PAUL CORAZZINI STORAGE BUILDING (Albedsons Lane - Greenport) Moved by Robed Keith and seconded by Herbed Ernst, it was RESOLVED, in consideration of the proximity of the building to the Main Road, to recommend that the Planning Board DENY the application and request RESUBMISSION with a more barnlike appearance, i.e. 5 x 12 roof pitch, board and batten siding, asphalt or wood shingle roof. The Committee will also need colors of the doom, window trim and roof. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. BEDELL CELLARS WINE STORAGE BUILDING (Main Road - Cutchogue) Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Yah Rieger, it was RESOLVED to offer NO COMMENT on construction after-the-fact. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. GRACE'S PLACE DAY CARE CENTER (Nodh Road - Peconic) Moved Yan Rieger and seconded by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED to MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MA TTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 mattituckfd~_.peconic, net commissioners JAMES D. ROACHE, Chairman G. Thomas Woodhull, Vice Chairman Martin L. Griffin Sr. John C. Harrison Norman A. Reilly, Jr. office (631) 298-8837 fax (631) 298-8841 John A. Keogh, Secretary Barbara Dickerson, Treasurer July 27, 200I Planning Board Office Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 Gentlemen: RE: SCTM #1000~ 122-6.12~o~ Shore Yacht Sates SCTM # 1000-142-1-27/Warex Terminals Corp. Please be aware that the above referenced properties will not need additiOnal firewells as there is sufficient firewell protection in the area. '--" Sincerely Jonn A. Keogh, Sect. Mattituck Fire district JUL 3 South01d Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer ~_~ North Shore Yachts Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-12 DATE: July 17, 2001 The Planning Board has received a revised site plan that differs from the plan that was submitted to your office as part of the Special Exception request, (revised plan attached.) This Board wishes to know if an amended Special Exception must be granted for this change? Additionally, is the requested fence to be placed east of the existing building? This is not shown on the revised plan. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHJkRD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer North Shore Yachts Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-12 July 18, 2001 Please review the above for drainage. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 18,2001 Michael Hughes North Shore Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: North Shore Yacht Sales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-11 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received your letter of July 12, 2001 and revised site plan. The following additions/changes must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: 1. Parking calculations must be corrected. The combined existing and proposed requirements for parking are fifteen (15) spaces. 2. The boat display & storage area appears to show parking spaces, the two southern spaces do not have the required twenty two (22) feet of back up space. Is this area for parking or for boat storage? 3. One of the ZBA conditions was a fence around the entire property. This fence is not shown around the entire property. 4. Parking area should be paved. Your elevation drawings will be reviewed by the Architectural Review Committee. The boats in the front yard landscaped area and in the residential portion of your property must be removed If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer Cc: Warren Sambach Sr. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 16, 2001 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find one (1) survey dated January 30, 2001, for the site plan for North Shore Yacht Sales SCTM#1000-122-6-12 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. O The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Submission Without a Cover LeHer Subject: · JUL 1 ;~ 2~01~ Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATILMVI, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 2001 Michael Hughes North Shore Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 North Shore Yacht Sales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-12 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received and approved the enclosed report from the Town Engineer. The report is being sent to you for your attention. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please call the Town Engineer, Jamie Richter directly at 765-1560. Site Plan Reviewer Encl. JEAN W. COCHRAN SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)- 765 -1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: North Shore Yachts Main Road, Mattituck SCTM #: 1000 - 122 - 06 - 12 Dear Mr. Orlowski: April 20, 2001 APR 2001 As per your request, I have reviewed the site pi'an for the above referenced project. The drainage calculations provided appear to be incomplete. There is a new 15' x 30' shed roof attached to the proposed building that was not included in the calculations. It is also difficult to verify the extent of all new construction. All new stone blend parking areas should be included into the drainage calculations using a run-off coefficient of 0.6. Alt new roof and asphalt areas will have a run-off coefficient of one. The run-off generated by any proposed new construction should be included in the design. Any and all existing drainage structures that are to be used to contain additional run-off generated by the proposed construction will need to be detailed and shown on the plan. A test hole should also be provided to ensure soil permeability and drainage ]}~, capabilities of the systems proposed. Please have the applicant revise the drainage calculations accordingly. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) JEAN W. COCHRAN SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765- 1366 Tel. (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: North Shore Yachts Main Road, Mattituck SCTM #: 1000- 122 -06- 12 Dear Mr. Orlowski: April 20, 2001 APR 3 2001 Sou l Town As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. The drainage calculations provided appear to be incomplete. There is a new 15' x 30' shed roof attached to the proposed building that was not included in the calculations. It is also difficult to verify the extent of all new construction. All new stone blend parking areas should be included into the drainage calculations using a run-off coefficient of 0.6. All new roof and asphalt areas will have a run-off coefficient of one. The run-off generated by any proposed new construction should be included in the design. Any and all existing drainage structures that are to be used to contain additional run-off generated bythe proposed construction will need to be detailed and shown on the plan. A test hole should also be provided to ensure soil permeability and drainage capabilities of the systems proposed. Please have the applicant revise the drainage calculations accordingly. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) ,~erely, //-) ~') , James A. Ric~te?, R.-A. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTI-IOLD MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Building Department April 9, 2001 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN CERTIFICATION Project North Shore Yacht Sales AFk l 0 2tJtll ,Southold Town Location Main Road Mattituck SCTM# 1000- Section 122 - Block 6 - Lot 12 Date of Last Revision 2/15/01 1. THE PROPOSED USE Sales AND ACCESSORY USE AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN IS / ARE PERMITTED IN THIS B DISTRICT. 2. PROPOSED AND EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 100 OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 3. ALL STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH SETBACKS AS CONTAINED IN BULK SCHEDULES OR ELSEWHERE IN CHAPTER 100. Authorized Signature PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIA_NO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 5, 2001 Michael Hughes North Shore Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 North Shore Yacht Sales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-12 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received and approved the enclosed report from the Architectural Review Committee. The report is being sent to you for your attention. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please call Co-Chair Garrett Strang at 765-5455. assner Site Plan Reviewer Encl. SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE April 5,2001 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Theodore Carpluk, Southold Howard G. Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also attending was Robert G. Kassner of the Planning Board Staff. Moved by Garrett A. Strang and seconded by Theodore Carpluk, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meetings of February 27 and March 20, 2001. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. NORTH FORK YACHTS (Main Road - Mattituck) In order to consider the application, the Committee requests elevations - and floor plans showing the relationship of the final construction with the existing building and the covered exterior space, photographs of the existing building, location of the mechanicals and exterior lighting ( with catalogue cuts for the latter), andplacement of the fascia and trim. Vote of the committee: Ayes All. Robert W. Keith Secretary PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer ~ North Shore Yachts Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-12 DATE: March 28, 2001 Please review the attached for certification. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer~ North Shore Yachts Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-12 DATE: March 28, 2001 Please review the above project for drainage. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 20, 2001 Michael Hughes North Shore Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 North Shore Yacht Sales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-11 Dear Mr. Hughes, This letter will summarize the actions you plan to take as discussed at the Planning Board work session of March 19, 2001. You agreed to contact the ZBA to resolve the following issues: The two conditions placed by the Zoning Board on your Special Exception concerning the fences._ Placing boats in the residential portion of your property. Side yard setback. You should discuss this issue with the Building Department first. You had indicated that you would: 1. Provide elevation drawings. 2. Drainage calculations. 3. Pave parking area and handicapped area. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. · et , ~.-c~ Rol~r . Kasgher S~te Plan Reviewer Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: SCTM#: 1000- Date: Commenls: %o'8 oI' North Shore Yacht Sales MATITrUCK 5.fY 11952 Phone 516-2o8 2~;32 Fax 516-298-1315 1999 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Pl~mning Boa~d We are purchasing the Fmpe;ty toc::ted f,t 9275 \ lain Road, Mattitack frOth h'h s Eileen Berger, and will be closing m the next 1-2 weeks The proprty w:ll be used m the same maimer a.,. it is cutter, dy, ie' business ope:ation in the building now occupied by an z~[lstate !ns. AgelV. Tbi; buildiqg will be used as a sales office f~r new,'~sed boats. The prope~y in tgc back is currently being used ]tbr boat storage by Dickersen Marine and will now be used for the s::orage et'our boats. Arrangements h:~ve l',cen made to :emoYe the three storage tar, k~; whi:h have a total storage capacity of approximately 50,0i~0 gals,resulting in the elimination of a potential danger to thc sun-muding commturity, much less lager truck traffick going to and from the hcility .and as we set up for oar new venture, the overall arpcarance will be greatly improved The back portion of the property has apparently been used as a dumping ground by unknown persons. We fully intend to clean up and remove all debris Therefore, we are requestiag a SpecJ~t1 !4xce ,tion be approved fir the above .stated us¢ of the ?roperty We than~t: you for your co:;sidcratl,m as v.e intend to bo a member of the Business Coramunib lb~ man,, years to come. Oreatfully Yours Michael Hughes PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGLANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 28, 2001 Michael Hughes North Shore Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Matfituck, NY 11952 North Shore Yacht Sales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-12 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received your revised site plan dated February 15, 2001. The following changes/additions must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: 1. Drainage calculations and dry wells for proposed building. 2. Side yard setback for proposed boat display and sales building must be twenty-five feet (25'). 3. Show all trees over six inches in caliper. 4. Show type of landscaping in front yard areas. Boats presently stored in this area must be removed. Show twenty-five foot transition buffer between the business zone and the residential zone. This buffer must be planted with a double row of six foot evergreens staggered ten foot on center. 6. Elevation drawings and floor plans. 7. Name of adjoining landowners. 8. Show any outdoor signs. Handicapped parking must be shown. This space must be paved, marked with the handicapped logo, and a sign placed at the top of the space. A paved walk leading to the handicapped entrance to the buildings must be provided. 10. Place bumper stops at parking spaces. 13. Entrance and parking area must be paved, show drainage. 14. Boats must be removed from the residential portion of the property. In addition to the above, the Zoning Board attached the following conditions to your Special Exception: A fence (for security purposes) shall be maintained in good condition surronding the entire parcel, except for the portion lying south of the frame building that is to be used as a showroom and office space. A locked gate shall be placed for emergency purposes. Please show this fence on the proposed site plan. A fence or other low barrier shall be constricted along the westerly side of the property, running southward from the existing 6-foot fence, to prevent vehicles from exiting from the neighboring property. (See ZBA Special Exception for other conditions). Please show both the existing fence and the requested barrier/fence on the proposed site plan. A review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the New York State Department of Transportation will be required. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. ely, ~-~ ' Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Warren A. Sambach Sr. Sttbi~ti~sion Withotti a Cover Letter Comments: ,out,,old Tow~ Subntis'sio;t Wilhottl a Cover Letter $outhold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 8, 2001 Michael Hughes North Fork Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NYl1952 , ~ ~ RE: North~Yac~h~/}'ales Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-11 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received your letter of February 6, 2001, regarding the above project. The Board had requested a site plan application. Please submit the application (copy enclosed). The fee for this application is $345.00. Please make the check out to The Town of Southold. In addition to the above, the Long Environmental Assessment Form, LEAF, should be completed. Elevation drawings, showing all four views, including materials and color, are requested for architectural review. A list of requirements is enclosed. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. s.S. inc e. rgly, ;~(, / Site plan Reviewer Ends. Information to be submitted or included with submission to Architectural Review Committee. * Site Plan. * Type of Building Construction, Occupancy, Use and Fire Separation. * Floor Plans Drawn to Scale 1/4"=1' preferred. * Elevation Drawings to Scale of all sides of each Building, 1/4"=l'preferred including the following information: Type and color of roofing - include sample. Type and color of siding - include sample. Type of windows and doors to be ussd, material and color of all windows and d6or.frames include sampls. TYPe and color of trim material include sample. * Type of heating/cooling equipmant to be used. Show exterior locations of all equipment i.e., heatpumps, air conditioning compressors, etc. on plans and/or elevations. * Type and locations of all roof-mounted mechanical equipment. * Type and locations of all mechanical equipment and/or plumbing venting through roof or building sidewall. * Type, color and style of proposed masonry material for chimneys or accent walls - include samples or photos. * Details, color, type and style of any proposed ornamentation, awnings, canopies or tents. * Photos of existing buildings and/or neighboring properties from four directions of project site. * Type, Color and Design of all exterior sig~ags, both building-mounted and free standing. Submission Withottt a Cover Letter Commenls: MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUB]: Planning Office ZBA Office May 7, 1999 Appl. No. 4681 - North Shore Yacht Sales Special Exception 1000-122-6-12 Please substitute the attached as the ZBA determination in the above matter. The copy left earlier contained a different version of Page 2, which should be discarded. Thank you. Town · APPE~ALS B. OARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF MAY 5, 1999 S. E. Appl. No. 4681 - MICHAEL HUGHES/NORTH SHORE YACHT SALES PARCEL 1000-122-6-12 STREET & LOCALITY: 9275 Main Road, Mattituck DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: April 22, 1999 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant is the owner of property located at the north side of Main Road in Mattituck, which has been used and occupied by the Bergen Oil Company. The property is located approximately 800 feet deep from the Main Road to the Long Island Railroad, and the southerly half is zoned B Business while the northerly half is zoned R-40 Residential. Applicant has submitted a survey map prepared by Young & Young, Surveyors May 31, 1988 for Dale Bergen, a prior owner. The 1988 survey shows the layout of the property with dimensions and setbacks of the buildings. The principal building consists of approximately 1104 sq. ft., and is situated 59.5 feet from the front line, 6.9 feet from the east side line, 42.1 feet from the west side line. The 1988 survey shows three oil storage tanks and a second building, all of which have been removed, according to applicant's testimony. Applicant submitted a sketch of a map with driveway and parking areas, entrances and exits, fencing and similar details related to this Special Exception use. For record purposes, it is noted that the following Town determinations were issued regarding this property: (a) Certificate of Occupancy No. Z-1157 issued September 20, 1961 to Robert L· Bergen for a business building, referring to Building Permit No. Z1447 dated June 15, 1961; (b) Certificate of Occupancy No. Z-5900 issued May 9, 1974 to Robert L. Bergen for a business building (repair shop) with addition, referring to Building Permit No. 6973Z dated November 7, 1974; (c) ZBA approval rendered ,luly 13, 1961 which extended the 'B' Business District boundary line 50 feet west, and specified a permanent westerly side yard of 14 feet and permanent rear yard of 14 feet. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Applicant requests a Special Exception to establish a business use consisting of the display, storage, sale and service of boats on the portion of property zoned B-Business. Code Section 100-101B(12) authorizes boat sales, with accessory repair facilities, in the B Zone provided a special Exception is issued by the Board of Appeals. Article XXVI of the Zoning Code sets forth the requirements for issuance of a Special Exception. Page 2 - May 5, 1999 ,~ ZBA. Sp. Exc. #468! - Michael Hughes REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: (1) After headng testimony and making personal inspection of the property, the Board has considered the General Standards set forth in Code Section 100-263, and finds and determines the following: (A) The proposed use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in the adjacent use district(s) (residential). (B) provided that the conditions set forth below are satisfied, the proposed use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the Business Distdct wherein it is proposed to be located, or of permitted or legally established uses in the adjacent residential use district. (C) The safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; (D) The proposed use will be in harmony with, and promote the general purposes and intent of the Zoning Code. (E) The proposed use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. (F) The structures, equipment and material will be readily accessible for fire and police protection. (2) The Board has considered the other matters relating to Special Exceptions set forth in Code Section 100-264, and finds that no adverse consequences will result from the proposed use. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the application as applied for, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. A fence (for security and safety purposes) shall be maintained in good condition surrounding the entire parcel, except for the portion lying south of the frame building that is to be used as a showroom and office space. A locked gate shall be placed for emergency purposes 2. A fence or other Iow barrier shall be constructed along the westerly side of the Page 3 - Play 5, 1999 ~ · ZB.A Sp..Exc. #4681 - Michael Hugh property, running southward from the existing 6-foot fence, to prevent vehicles from exiting over the neighboring property. 3. To the greatest extent possible, larger boats shall be stored and displayed on the easterly portion of the property. 4. To the greatest extent possible, service work on boats shall be conducted on the easterly portion of the property (to keep noise levels down). 5. As required by Section 100-101B(12) of the Zoning Code: A. Entrance and exit driveways shall be arranged so as to avoid necessity of any vehicle backing out onto the Main Road. B. Dismantled boats, and parts and supplies, shall be located within a building. Any storage of gasoline or flammable oils in bulk shall be fully underground and at least 35 feet from any property line other than the street line. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MEMBERS GOEHRINGER, DINIZIO, TORTORA, and COLLINS. (Member Homing of Fishers Island was absent-exc~gjse~his Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). ×.~/ ~ERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRM~' J For Filing 5/7/99 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICI4_~oJ) G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 10, 1999 Michael Hughes North Fork Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: As built site plan for former Bergen Oil Property 9275 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-11 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received your "as built" site plan for the above project. The Board requires an "as built" plan showing the entire property including zone lines. The plan should be prepared by a licensed surveyor and contain all data required by Town Code 100-256 C "technical data". If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. cc: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Homing BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF MAY 5, 1999 S. E. Appl. No. 4681 - MICHAEL HUGHES/NORTH SHORE YACHT SALES PARCEL 1000-122-6-12 STREET & LOCALITY: 9275 Main Road, Mattituck DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: April 22, 1999 Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 MAY 0 Southold Town Planning Board FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant is the owner of property located at the north side of Main Road in Mattituck, which has been used and occupied by the Bergen Oil Company. The property is located approximately 800 feet deep from the Main Road to the Long Island Railroad, and the southerly half is zoned B Business while the northerly half is zoned R-40 Residential. Applicant has submitted a survey map prepared by Young & Young, Surveyors May 31, 1988 for Dale Bergen, a prior owner. The 1988 survey shows the layout of the property with dimensions and setbacks of the buildings. The principal building consists of approximately 1104 sq. ft., and is situated 59.5 feet from the front line, 6.9 feet from the east side line, 42.1 feet from the west side line. The 1988 survey shows three oil storage tanks and a second building, all of which have been removed, according to applicant's testimony. Applicant submitted a sketch of a map with driveway and parking areas, entrances and exits, fencing and similar details related to this Special Exception use. For record purposes, it is noted that the following Town determinations were issued regarding this property: (a) Certificate of Occupancy No. Z-1157 issued September 20, 1961 to Robert L. Bergen for a business building, referring to Building Permit No. Z1447 dated June 15, 1961; (b) Certificate of Occupancy No. Z-5900 issued May 9, 1974 to Robert L Bergen for a business building (repair shop) with addition, referring to Building Permit No. 6973Z dated November 7, 1974; (c) ZBA approval rendered July 13, 1961 which extended the 'B' Business District boundary line 50 feet west, and specified a permanent westerly side yard of 14 feet and permanent rear yard of 14 feet. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Applicant requests a Special Exception to establish a business use consisting of the display, storage, sale and service of boats on the portion of property zoned B-Business. Code Section 100-:I.01B(12) authorizes boat sales, with accessory repair facilities, in the B Zone provided a special Exception is issued by the Board of Appeals. Article XXVI of the Zoning Code sets forth the requirements for issuance of a Special Exception. Page 2 - May 5, 1999 ~ ZBA Sp. Exc. #4681 - Michael Hugh REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: After hearing testimony and making personal inspection of the property, the Board has considered the General Standards set forth in Code Section 100-263, and finds and determines the following: (A) The proposed use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in the adjacent use district(s) (residential). (B) provided that the conditions set forth below are satisfied, the proposed use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the Business District wherein it is proposed to be located, or of permitted or legally established uses in the adjacent residential use district. (C) The safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; (D) The proposed use will be in harmony with, and promote the generai purposes and intent of the Zoning Code. (E) The proposed use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. (F) The structures, equipment and material will be readily accessible for fire and police protection. (2) The Board has considered the other matters relating to Special Exceptions set forth in Code Section J, 00-264, and finds that no adverse consequences will result from the proposed use. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the application as applied for, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDIq'IONS: Security fencing around the entire parcel, commencing at the rear of the principal building and not extending further than 50 feet past the B-Business Zoning; all fencing shall be maintained in good condition at all times for security and safety reasons. A locked gate shall be placed for emergency purposes 2. A fence or other Iow barrier shall be constructed along the westerly side of the Page 3 - May 5, 1999 ~ ZBA Sp. Exc. #4681 - Michael Hugh property, running southward from the existing 6-foot fence, to prevent vehicles from exiting over the neighboring property. 3. To the greatest extent possible, larger boats shall be stored and displayed on the easterly portion of the property. 4. To the greatest extent possible, service work on boats shall be conducted on the easterly portion of the property (to keep noise levels down). 5. As required by Section 100-101B(12) of the Zoning Code: A. Entrance and exit driveways shall be arranged so as to avoid necessity of any vehicle backing out onto the Main Road. B. Dismantled boats, and parts and supplies, shall be located within a building. C. Any storage of gasoline or flammable oils in bulk shall be fully underground and at least 35 feet from any property line other than the street line. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MEMBERS GOEHRINGER, DINIZIO, TORTORA, and COLLINS. (Member Horning of Fishers Island was absent-exc]jsed-.)~;his Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). ~] /. j/~.....~,/__/~/~J ~ ~//'~ERARD P. GOEHRINGER,~CHAIRM~' J For Filing 5/7/99 ~ WILLIAM J. CREMERS o~ ~ KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCYIIE LATHAM, JR. ~~ RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOVfN OF SOUTHOLD May 4, 1999 Michael Hughes North Fork Yacht Sales 9275 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: North F4~'k Yachts 9275 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-11 Dear Mr Hughes, The Planning Board received your letter regarding the "as built" site plan for the above project. The following additions/changes must be made before the Board can accept the "as built" plan: /~1. Handicapped parking must be shown. /2: Scale of plan not shown. x~.' Sign sketch to scale, materials and color. ~ Entire property must he shown, including metes and bounds. 5. Proposed boat storage seems to interfere with parking on the west side. No accesses to parking on east side. parking calculations not shown. Parking spaces to be marked with recessed bumper stops. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. ce ly, Site Plan Reviewer cc: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement i'LANNING BOARD MEMB~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 16, 1999 Michael,Hg_~hes North~Yacht Sales 11500 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Bergen Oil Property 9275 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-6-11 Dear Mr. Hughes, The Planning Board has received your request for a review of your planned move to the above property. As discussed with you at the Board's work session on March 15, 1999, an "as built" site plan will be required after you complete all site improvements. Good luck at your new location. '--~Rd§~t Gr. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer cc: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement SITE PLAN Presubmission conference (xVithin 30 days of written request) Complele application received (wilh/n 4 months f~f presub, conference) APplication reviewed at work session (~vi~hin 10 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions (wiHfin 30 days of review) Revised subntission received S.2~.Agen% Coordination T~fl/~ ~ ~gRA de[ertnination _ . ,u zn 60 days or ,' quem Uoard of Trustees -X'~ ~ partment (certification) urrolk Coun,- ~ fy wepartmeat of ' ~partment of Trans ....... ' Uu~tutlO~ -3Late __Department of T . ransportation _ Count d¢,< ~ ~°~73-=~ ~4~ ~54'~'~ Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions w'L<~dscape plan ¢-~ting plan Cut approval ~'~age plan ' ~v/b,ved by Engineer .~-'~ APproval of site plan -xvid~ condhions Cerlificate of Occupanc.v in'spection One Year review Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee APPLICATION FOR CONSIDEP. ATION OF A SITE PLAN New Change of Use Re-use Extension Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: SCTM#: Location: Address: ooo-/Zz.-- Name of Applicant: Address of ~plicant: Agent or Person responsible Telephone: Site plans prepared License No. Address: Telephone: Page 2 · Planning Board Site Plan Application STATE OF NEW YORK COUNIY OF SUFFOLK in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the of the (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, ~ altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that ttl~r~'cQ~l physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans Subrn~tted. %.~ / j ,, s,g, /v Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) Sworn_J~ me thLs, (Notary Public) HELENE O. HORNE Notary Public, State of New York No. 4951364 Qualified in Su[folk County.. Commission Expires May 22, Page 3 · Planning Board Site Plan Application o~/~Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) ~.~,~¢.~_~/~ Zoning Distdct · ' Existing Use of Site "P~posed Uses on Si(e.-Show all uses proposed an~ existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use Is p~posed per building, indicate square /~ge o~oor a rea that wi lib Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) /,,o~) ..~/7Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees - Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision .Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONST£UCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIl APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. V/OLATO£S APE SUBJECT TO P£OSECUTION. Page 1 of 1 Semon, Bruno From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:53 AM To: Rudder, Georgia Subject: Open permits or c/o on the below listed property Hi Georgia, SCTM: 122-6-12 When you have time please verify c/o's on the listed permits below. Are any other permits open on this property? Thank You Bruno 5/29/03 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Southold, N.Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) PERMIT NO. 25593 Z Date MARCH 10 99 Permission is hereby granted to: EIDAL Com. PO BOX 1406 MATTITUCKtNY 11952 for : REMOVAL OF THREE OIL TANKS AS APPLIED FOR. at premises located at 9605 County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 122 pursuant to application dated MARCH Building Inspector. MAIN RD MATT I TUCK Block 0006 Lot No. 012 10 99 and approved by the Fee $ 15.00 ORIGINAL Rev. 2/19/98 FOBH HO. I TOMH OF SOUTBOLD BUILDING DKPAR~NT TOMH HALL BOARD OF flKALTB ............... 3 SK?$ OF PLAHS ............... (Buildtns Inslmc~') APFLICATION FOR BUILDING PK~IT (tlaili~l addrem of ~q2plicm£) (as m the t~t tull c~ latest ~t~er 'A'ade's License Ilo ..................... (mm) ~O~ NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BU~.~ING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office Southold, N. Y. Certificnte Of Occupancy ...... Date THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at Map No. x~ ...... Block No. g~ . . Lot No. .N./S ¥~. i.n..Ilo.a.d. .........Street .XXX.. M~ttl.t.~Ck...N.:¥; ...... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore fried in this office dated . .l~.oy... 7 , 19 7.~. pursuant to which Building Permdt No. 6973Z dated .... N. gv ? ..., 19 7.~., was issued, and conforms to all of the require- ments of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is .Busi.ne.s.s...bu.i. 1..di.n.g..(re.p..a.i.r .s.h. qp) .w.i.t.h .~d. dit. i.o..n ................. The certificate is issued to .Rg.b. ert L.:..B.er.g.e.n. ...... O.w~..e.r. ....................... (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval .N..R. . .................... UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE No...N..~?.2..6.~.3. ....... .Ap.~.i. 1....8....~ .9.?? ......... HOUSE NUMBER .9705 .... Street ..... .M.~i..n..R. qa~.d ......................... FORTH NO. ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN GLERK'S OFFICE $OUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PI~EMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N? 6973 Z · Permission is hereby gronted to: ................ ,3. w.t :t~L'~ek:, ....................................... to ............................. ~ .~.~.~..~.~ ....... ,/l... J~L ,,.t. ~.~?,g..bl~.s .Ln ~.o.:~.. hLL~ lA :%1:~ ..................................... ut premiss Iocuted ut .~..,la~*..,~Uz.~...~..2~U%O=~:..~== .................................................... ...................................................... .~.~..~m~. ................................................................................... punuont to opplicution dot~ .......................... k:~ ........ .~ .......... , ~9~.,., ond opp~ved by the Building I~or. · ITM Buildih~ Inspe~toI NO. ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office Southold, N. Y. Certificate Of Occupancy THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at ..N/S Main .Roa.d. .......... Street Map No. x;zx ..... Block No. xy~ ..... Lot No.. ~ M.att$.t.~qk..N ,¥., ...... conforms substantlally to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated . . . NOW... ? , 19 ?~ pursuant to which Building Permit No. 6973Z dated ..... No~... ? , 19..7I+, was issued, and conforms to all of the require- ments of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . .B.u.s..i.n.e s. s...b.ui..1.di.n.g. ,(?.e.p .a.i.r, .shqp). .w. it~h .a.d..d.it.i..o.n. ................ The certificate is issued to Ro.b.e.r. t L,...B.er.g.e.n. ....O~ne .r ........................ (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval N oR. , .............. UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE No...N..1.5..2.6.5~. ...... .Ap.r.i. 1....8....1.9.7.~. ......... HOUSE NUMBER .970~ Street ..... .M. gi,.n..R.q~.d ........................ THE NEW YORK BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS It.L. ~,o~et~ ~,~(le H~I~ ~na~[~ ;~09' ~o I'aC~O~ ~vc.~ .,a~ and found to be in comphance with the requirc~nents of th~ Board. Lot RANGES OVENS EXHAUST FANf OTHER ~M~ffARATU$ E R V I C '[olt,,;v.~lle, i,..v.o 117]12 Gl~dtAt MANA~dt .LA COPY FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS COPY OF CERTIFICATE MUST NOT BE ALTERED IN ANY MANNER. · ow~ o~ so~?~oL~ ¥ ?OWN CLERK'S O~ICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. INSTRUCTIONS D. ~OV 7 1~ 73 are ............... , ................................ , ............ a. This application must be completely filled tn by typewriter or in mk and submitted in triplicate to the BuiJdin Inspector, with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule b Plo plan showing Iocohon of lot and of bud rigs on premises, relahonsh~p to odlmnmg premises or public streets c areas, and giving a detmled descriphon of layout ofproperi7 must be drawn on the diagram which is part of th s appl cat os c. The work covered by this app[[c(~tion may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building inspector wdl ~ssue a Budding Permit to the applicant. Such petrol shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used ~n whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occuponc shall have been granted by the Budding Inspector APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of o Building Permit pursuant to th Budding Zone Ord nonce of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances c Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterahons, or for removal or demolition, os herein describe~ The applicant agrees to comply w~th ail applicable lows, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, end t admit authorized respecters on premises and in buildings for necessary inspections. (Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation) [,~ t~- ~ t~ck (Address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builde~ ............................................... .~..o.~. ............................................................................................................................. Name of owner of premises ....~.o,..~.g.~,...~.,.....~.e...~..~.e..~.. ................................................................................................ \ If apphcant is a corporate, signature of duly authorized ofhcer. Builder's License No .................................................... Plumber's License No ................................................. Electrician's License No ............................................ Other Trade's L~cense No ............................................... 1. Locatmn of land on which proposed work will be done Map No .......... T-~ ........................ Lot No ...... ~ ............ Street and Number ..]:../.?......~.~..D...,t,~.,°.~ ............ .].;~,.~.!.?..~-~¢~ ............................................................................... Municipality 2. State exJsting use end occupancy of p~emises and intended use end occupancy of proposed construction: a Ex~s~ting use and occupancy ......~.o.~.o.~...~.o.]~, .......................................................................................... some ~'ith ~n ,~ddition b. Intended use and occupczncy .............................................................................................................................. 3' Nature of work (check which applica~e). New Bulldmg .................. Addition .......Tw~..........~lterotlon ......... Repair .................. Removal .................. Demohhon .......... Other Work ..................................... (Description) 4 Estin~ated Cost ..................... ~..Q~..~.+ ..................... Fee ...?.~..t..0..0.. ............................................................... (to be paid on filing th~s appllcahon) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units ........ ..0. ................ Number of dwe[hng units on each floor .......... If garage, number of cars ................................................................................................................................ 6 If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use ....................... 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any. Front .......................... Rear ................................ Depth ................... Height ........................ Number of Stories ........................................................................................................ D~mensions of s~me structure with a[terahons or addrhons: Front .................................... Rear . Depth ................................ Hmght .......................... Number of Stories ............................... 8. Dimensions of enhre new construction: Front ....... ~.~, ....................... Rear ......... 2~ .............. Depth ** ~.Lk. .. . Height .................... Number of Stories ***o..~,.e. .............................................................................. 9 S~ze of lot, Front .................................................. Rear ......................................... Depth ................ ]0 Dote of Purchase ................................................. Nom~ of Former Owner .............................................. 1 1. Zone or use d~strlct [n which premises ore situated E..1 ........ TJus~e~n ................................................ 12, Doe5 proposed construction violate any zoning Iow, ordinance or regulohon ....... ~O. ........................................... 13. Wdl lot be regraded ..,.T~Q ................... Will excess fill be removed from premises. ( ) Yes ( ) No ) 4 Name of Owner of premises ....~.,L.,J~e.;E~,~CL ....................... Address .....[,.~;~J;3~ck..... Phone No. ..................... Name of Architect ....................................... Address ................................ Phone No ...................... Nome of Contractor .....~}.~.~:[..A~,~,~.~......~9~..~.~c;.t~...,~,~ress .....!:~.[.~,,.~.[~..... Phone No ...................... PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and d~stinctly all bulldmgs, whether ex~sting or proposed and indicate all set-b~ck dimensmns fro~ property lines. Give street and block number or descnphon according to deed, and show street names and indlcat whether interior or comer lot o STATE OF NEW ~'O~K, ESS COUNTY Of ,, .~,f.~.~ ........... ~ ' ~d~ Abitz ............................................................................................ being duly sworn, deposes and says that he ~s the opphcar (Name of indw~dual signing contract) above named. He is the ............................. ~..~..~.~.c~?.~. ................................................................................................................. (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, eta ) of said owner or owners, and m duly authorized to perform or have performed the so~d work and to make and fl th~s application; that ~lI statements contained m th~s application are true to the best of h~s knowledge and behef, ar tho{ the work wdl be performed in the manner set forth m the opphcation filed therewith Sworn to before?..., me thiSof ~q. 'v'_ __ 197..3 ~ ~'~'~ /./~../'/~.~. / ................. ....... N at a ry P u b I lC, .~.,'~.~.. f~--~'.~,.c~.~Cou nt y ~~~'-:... ....................... ~ (Signature of alSplicant) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY / / THIS CEP, TI.flES that the building located ot,,~/~..J~8.J.~..l~Oa~ ............ ........................ Street con,arms su/b~antio[ly to the Application for Bd~ild ng Permit heretofore fi[ed in this office dated .................................... ~T~..~'te.....~'~ ........... , 19.,6.1.. pursuant to which Building Permit No..~,l-b~.~... doted ....................... ~.....~.~ .........., 19.~., was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the b3w. The occupancy for which this cart f catfi is issued is .......... ' I ! of the oforesoid building. ! ' .\ Building Inspector/ ',\ I~ORM NO. ! TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. Examined ..........,~"~...../..~...~.... 19,~.-/.. ApprovJd ......... .'/..~4~m~',,,....Y., .!~..~..... ' 9. ~.... Per m it No ......... ~../.. ~/,,~.~ ,~,. Disapproved a/c ................ : ;~.~. ,~..:, ...:.? ,~ - ... ~,. ............. .~... ........... .................. APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted in duplicate to the Building Inspector. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this location. c. The work covered by this appllcatlon may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this opplication~ the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the progress of the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whale or in p art for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shah have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuanoe of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or a Iterations, or for removal or demolition, os herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with oil applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Robert L. Bergen (Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation) (Address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. ............................ .O3~.p~.r .......................................................................................................................................................... Name of owner of premises ... ~.o..'qer t. ,.L..:...~.e,.~e.~ ....... if applicant is a corporate, signature of duly authorized officer. (Name and title of corporate officer) 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done. Map No: .~ ................................. Lot No:Y,,7~f, .............. Street and Number ..~./~..,.~.~..q.,.~9.~.d.,:'.~l~..~....,2,.0...0~...~L.~.~,'~,9~''~...'~'~.~..,~.1~$~ ............................... Municipality 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and oceupancy.......~.a,~.t,..-'bar~ ................................................................................................... b. Intended use and occupancy ........ .~..g. fi.~?.,..s.p....~.,*l,.c~il~ ............................................................................... 3. .Nature of work (check which applid ~: New Building .................... Addition ............ t. Alteration .................... Repair ................ .,/,.Removal .................... Demolition .................... Other Work (Describe) .- .i'd[ave building t;o (to be paid on filing this application) 5, if dwelling, number of dwelling units ................................ Number of dwelling units on each floor ............................ If garage, number of cars .................................................................................................. 6. If business, commercial ar mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use....]~t~J,~Q~.~ ....... 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front.....,.~ ................. Rear .......... 2.t~ ............. Depth ....... ~,~ ................ Height ............................ Number of Stories .o.b.e. ..................................................................................................... Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front ................................ Rear ................................ Depth .............................. Height .............................. Number of Stories ................................ 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front ............ ' ................ Rear ............................ Depth ............................ Height ............................ Number of Stories ............................ 10. Dote of Purchase ........................................................ Nome of Former Owner ........................................................ I1. Zone or use district in which premises are situated...~.!A,~[~J~!!.....r,].J-n.~ ................................................................ 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? .................................................... 13. Name of Owner of premises..~,.~.~,~.~,~.{;.~ ............. Address ...... ~a.~.~J,.~.~.Ck ................ Phone NO ..................... Name of Architect ........................................................ Address ............................................ Phone NO ..................... Name of Contractor .................................................... Address ............................................ Phone NO ..................... PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and indicate all set-back dimensions from property lines. Give street and block numbers or description according to deed, ~d show street names and indicate whether interior or corner lot. s'rAT~ OF N£W~g¥Om<. ) S S. ............................................ ~q~Q'~.~.~..~,..T,....[~I',~eZ~...,.,' ........ I~eing duly sworn, deposes end soys that he is the ~pplicant (Nome of individual signing application) above named. He is the ............................................................................................................................................................. owner (Contractor, agent, car[borate officer, etc.) of so d owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work ar~ to make and file this application that ali statements contained in this apD$icotion are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the opplicortzieq fil~/d th, er~wi~h% 14-16-2 (9j95)-- 7c 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental QuaLity Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full £^F is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal know[edge of the environment or may net be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have know[edge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin§ the question of significance. The full £AF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a proiect or action. Full FAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I CI Part 2 [:]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this FAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. I'1 13. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* I-I C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMAO'N Prepared by Project Sponsor f · HOTIEE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the act[on proposed may have a significant e ~ect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through £. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve Inte~, studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION ...~ ~.~.~ TELEPHONE Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed Xnd undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ("tOrban I-Ilndustria[ [:]Forest I-IAgrlculture 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres Forested acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres I-IC_ommerciaJ~ J:]Res~d__en~ial (suburban) [3Rural (non-farm) ~bther <~/~.~/,A/~ ::~J. acres. PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres _ acres Other (Indicate type) ~'~ .3. What is predominant soil .type(s) on project, site? a. Soil drainage: ~Vell drained ~) % of site [3Moderately well drained - % of site I-IPoody drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved.,~ow many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NY-~ Land Classification Systemt' ,L///[ acres. (See~,~.YCR~.7. · 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on proie~c.t site? ..~s ,,Ag. No a. What is depth to bedrock~ ,/)?1~ , (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of 6 Is project substantially contiguous to. or ~,on~in Registers of Historic Places? [:]Yes 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8 What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? (~Yes ~roject site with slopes: [:3' ~-10% % [~10-15% % E315% or greater % a building, s~te, or district, listed on the State or the National [~Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? {:]Yes threatened' or endangered? 11. Does project site~,ontain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as [:]Yes ']~x,N o According to Identify eac"h species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i,e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [~Yes ~o Describe 13. Is the project sit~t'esently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I-lyes ,l~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present si~tle include scenic views known to be important to the community? [:]Yes Ko /// 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: /~//~_ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributa~ 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or,c.o~i~uous to project area: a. Name ./~L///X~ b. Size (In acres) -- 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [~es I-]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow Connection? I-lYes E]No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary Ilow connection? I-lyes 18. Is the site located in an agricultural~trict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? I-lYes &~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguo~S~Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I-lYes'"":' '[~No ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I-lYes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate),,~.~ a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor '~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: / acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped ~/ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed/'--'""~ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour · (upon' completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure, height; wide; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy Ist' /./~//'2~ ft. 3 2. How much natural material rock. earth, etc.) will be removed from Oite? /~//11~ tons/cubic yards 3, Wiil disturbed areas be reclaimed? [:]Yes ONo ON/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaims b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [=]Yes ~No ~ c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? aYes 4 How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed 'from site? acres. 5. Will any matu~_~forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes l~No 6. If single phas~p'roject: Anticipated period of construction/~/' months, (including demolition) 7. tf multi-phased: / _ (number) a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of. commencement phase 1 ~ month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase ~--"~f.~/~l~ monthe-,,~/ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [:]Yes aNo & Will blasting occur during construction? OYes . ~o · . - ion. ,~/~1~j ; after project is complete / / 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? aYes /~o If yes, explain a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ~ Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposaR Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100,y~' flood plain? i-lYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? {:]Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? OYes I-iNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain ./7 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. bm If yes. what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one ho~ur per day)? ayes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local amb~, oise levels? aYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [:]Yes if yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumpingfcapacity ~/.f/~, gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~1~///~. gallons/day.~/~ 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes ,~o If Yes, explain 4 OYes ,/~o OYes 55. Approvals Required: C~ty, Town. Village Board [~Yes City, Town, Village Planning Board OYes [~No City, Town Zoning Board ~]Yes City, County Health Department [:3Yes Other Local Agencies {:]Yes [~]No Other Regional Agencies [~Yes ONo State Agencies ~3Yes ~3No Federal Agencies I~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information Type ~E~es [~No Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? If Yes. indicate decision required: [:]zoning amendment I-Izoning variance I~special use permit [:]subdivision s[~tte plan Onew/revision of master plan I-Iresource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Submittal Date 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? OYes ONo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y~.rr~l~? ~:~s ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land; how many lots are proposed~' a. What is the minimum lot size proposed~ <'~ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 0-1Yes 11. Will the proposed action crea~L/~demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? I-lYes ~[3No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? i-lYes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the 8eneration.of traffic significantly above present levels? 0-1Yes ~qo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes [-1No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sp,e'pso~ N am~"~ Date t on Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this a~sessment. 5 Part PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIr Responsibility of Lead Agency General In~ormalion (Read Carefullyl · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each proiect, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the ImpactL If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Iden{Ifylng that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact In column 2 simlSly asks that tt be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large Impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) In the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box In column 3. A No response Indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change t.o the project site? BNO [OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the sitei' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO OYES · Specific land forms:. 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change i--I r-] OYes ONo O [] OYes FINo [] O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo [] O OYes ONo [] [] OYes ONo O E]] OYes ONo [] [] OYes ONo O [] I-lYes ONo O [] OYes ONo IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ON• OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any nomprotected existing or new body of water? ON• OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? OHO FIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 8all•ns. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts:. 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoffl ONO rqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change O O OYes [:]No [] 0 OYes J~]No 0 0 OYes ON• O O OYes []No [] [] OYes ~lNo [] O [:]Yes []No [] [] OYes I--IN• [] O OYes ON• [] [] OYes ON• F'I O OYes ON• O [] OYes mN• E] O OYes tiN• 0 [] OYes ON• [] [] []Yes ~] O OYes ON• [] [] OYes OHo [] O OYes •No [] 0 OYes ON• 0 O OYes ONo [] 0 OYes ONo 0 0 OYes ONo · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~INO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs, per hour or a heat source producin8 more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existin8 industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? r'iNO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Applica{ion of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · O~her impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? nNO C1YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? I'~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture~ vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 ~ 2 3~ S to Potential Can Impac, t Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes E~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~]No [] [] []Yes ElNa [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No D ~ ~Yes DNo D D ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the sod profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems {e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures(e.g cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO [:]YES (If necessa~,, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importancei' CINO nyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities;~ Examples that would apply to column 2 I-INO [3YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated B~ Impact Impact Project Chan~ [] [] [:]Yes []N [] [] []Yes ~]N [] [] []Yes []N [] [] []Yes []N O O OYes ~]N [] [] OYes ON D ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~h ~ ~ DYes Dh 0 O OYes ~I 0 0 DYe, O~ 14 IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or umque character istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(8) ? ONe [~YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the desi§nation et the CEA Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quanhty of the resource? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? · Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? · Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? · nNO [:3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or §oods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ~]NO CE]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a §rearer than 5% increase in th~' use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than $0 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: 10 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [~]No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] []Yes [~No [] [] []Yes []No E3 [] E]¥es []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [] ~ E~Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? E]NO E~YES [xamples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operatin§ noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? nNO [DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, hi§hly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impact: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAQTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? [3NO [DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the prolect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for futura'projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts:. ~1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes E~No [] E] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []NO [] [] EiYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [DYes [DNo [] [] []Yes [DNo [] [] []Yes []No i--I I-I I-lyes I-1No [] [] f-lYes []No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? I-]NO [DYES Il any action In Part 2 Is Identified al · potential large Impact or If you cannot determine the magnitude of Impaot. proceed to Part 3 11 Part 3--EW IATION OF THE IMPORTAI E OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may b~ mitigated. Instruclions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: I. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact bY project change(s). 3 ' Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 12 14.14.1 I (9/95)--9¢ 6]7.20 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question ] ] of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the Hational or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · Hational Hatural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · Hational Park Service lands;) · Rivers designated as Hattonal or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or.Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or Inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site. area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-1/4 1/4 -V2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] 0 0 0 [] n 0 [] [] [] [] o [] [] o [] [] [] [] [] [] [] o [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) I-lYes OHo Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? O~es OMo DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVlRON/VlENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the environment. surrounding Within '1/4 mile * 1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] I~esignated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V~ mile i-]Yes i--lNo *l miles []Yes I--~No '2 miles []Yes ~]No *.3 miles [--]Yes I-~No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriat EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is HOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUEHCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At workslte [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] 2 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 06/28/01 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt: 3438 Subtotal $345.00 Check#: 3438 Total Paid: $345.00 Name: North, Shore Yacht Sales P O Box 528 Mattituck, NY 11952 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 35302 LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Project Type: Amended Site Plans Status: Expired SCTM #: 1000- 122.-6-12 Project Name: North Shore Yacht Sales Address: 9605 Main Road, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: Michael Hughes Owner Name: Hughes, Michael Zone 1: B Approval Date: I~/~ OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION End SP Date: Zone 2: Location: Main Road, SC Filing Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: A date indicates that we have recaive(I the related information Zone 3: Mattituck SCANNED SCAN Date: MAR 2 1 2;: Records Management___j RESIDENCE R-40 BUSINESS 'F KEY MAP V 'x E ¢,, ,~,¢.¢ I I '1 I I I 5 Z. OCT Y,~ 2901 ~'~; I /I/ 'r 'F 'WARREN A. S,~BAOH-=r, ......... J l ,J SO~ T u ,tAN Southold Town Plannin~i Board I Southold Town Planning Board -F $o~hold Town Planning Board - Sod TU _/ C-L-~ V~ TI OM -:' SEP ~.6 2Unl SouthCd Town Planning Board RESIDENCE R-40 BUSINESS .BOAT STORAGE, ~osEO KEY MAP SITE PLAN SCALE: 1'=20' [ [[ SEP Z 6 2uol $outho!d Town Planning Board f '1 RESIDENCE R-40 BOAT STORAGE tx. .pRoPOs SITE PLAN SCALE: KEY M 'A P SEP ~ 6 2001 Southold Town Planning Board RESIDENCE R-40 ..... BUSINESS 'B' BOAT STORAGE ~ I~ttt ROI~O : 'K" E Y M A P 14o S I T 'E "P'L' A 'N r' .~ JUL lZ :~ '/ J::Ol)/'4 DA 1'1 ~/,4 I I L: _ ~1 W ~L .J -I' II i I I I u