HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-10.-10-2 OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY 11971
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY11971
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
To: Jill Doherfy, President
Town of Southold Board of Truste~.s-~
From: MarkTerry, Principal Planner '~.
LWRP Coordinator
Date: May 17, 2010
Re:
Proposed Wetland Permit for THOMAS SHILLO
SCTM#1000-10-10-2
Docko, Inc. on behalf of THOMAS SHILLO requests a Wetland Permit to remove 182+/-
sf. existing wood deck, 22+/- If. of concrete retaining wall and replace with boulders,
30+/- cy. over 500+/- sf. under pier along edge of water, construct 68+/- If. of wood pile
and timber pier, install a 6'X 20' float with associated 3.5'X 24' ramp and restraint piles,
at or waterward of the apparent high water line. Located: The Gloaming, Fishers Island.
SCTM#10-10-2
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency
Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization
Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP
Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records
available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT
with the below Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP;
provided that the proposed action meets sub-policies 6.3 and 9.4 outlined below.
6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands.
Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town
Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other
lands under their jurisdiction
Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth
in Trustee permit conditions.
The applicant must demonstrate that the following dock standards pursuant to §
275-11. Construction and operation standards have been met
(d) Review and approval of dock applications. Before issuing a permit for a
dock structure, the Trustees shall consider whether the dock will have any of the
following harmful effects:
[1] Whether the dock will impair navigation or be located in areas of high
vessel traffic or vessel congestion;
[2] Whether the dock will unduly interfere with the public use of waterways
for swimming, boating, fishing, shellfishing, waterskiing and other water-
dependant activities;
Chapter 275 requires that the determination of the length of the dock
must include the dimensions of the vessel. The dimensions of a
vessel are not specified.
[3 ] Whether the dock will unduly interfere with transit by the public along
the public beaches or foreshore;
[4 ] Whether the dock will significantly impair the use or value of
waterfront property adjacent to or near the dock;
[5] Whether the dock will cause degradation of surface water quality and
· natural resources;
[6] Whether the dock will cause habitat fragmentation and loss of
significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats;
[7] Whether the dock will result in the destruction of or prevent the growth
of vegetated wetlands, seagrasses including eelgrass (Zostera marina)
and widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima) or shellfish;
[8] Whether the dock will unduly restrict tidal flow or water circulation;
[11] Whether the cumulative impacts of a residential and commercial dock
will change the waterway or the environment and whether alternate
design, construction, and location of the dock will minimize cumulative
impacts; and
[12] Whether adequate facilities are available to boat owners and/or
operators for fueling, discharge of waste and rubbish, electrical service
and water service.
9.4 Assure public access to public trust lands and navigable waters.
Provide access to, and reasonable recreational use of, navigable waters
and public trust lands under water.
Provide for free and unobstructed public use of all navigable waters
below the line of mean hi,qh water for navigation, recreation,
and other public trust purposes~ including the incidental ri.qhf-~
of public anchoring.
Structures extending beyond the minimum necessary for
access to navigable waters impair public trust interests and
open space values associated with the water's surface. Allow
such structures only in the following circumstances:
a. when necessary for practical and convenient operation of
water-dependent industry or commerce, and provided that
obstruction of commercial navigation does not result.
b. for commercial recreational boating facilities provided that:
(i) the loss of navigable waters and use of underwater
lands is offset by sufficient public benefit, and
(ii) obstruction of commercial navigation does not result.
when the principal purpose of the structure is
necessary:
(i) to provide public access for recreational uses
(ii) for improvements for navigation
(iii) for protection from coastal hazards, or
(iv) for essential public transportation and transmission
facilities.
The proposed action has been identified as a recreational use and therefore does
not warrant extending beyond the "minimum necessary" over public waters. The
water depth at the dock terminus is 4'. It is recommended that the Board
evaluate whether the proposed 112' dock structure will "extend' beyond the
minimum necessary for access to navigable waters" to meet sub-policy 9.~.
above.
In the event that the action is approved; to further Policies 5. Protect and improve water
quality in the Town of Southold, 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands
and Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island
Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. It is recommended that the Board
require that the silt boom be deployed during the construction of the structure
pursuant to:
§ 275-11 Construction and operation standards.
A. General The following standards are required for all operations within the
jurisdiction of the Trustees:
(2) Erosion control. Installation of an erosion control structure is necessary
during any building, grading, landscaping or site work activity within Trustee
jurisdiction. This structure may include, but is not limited to, installation of a silt
fence, hay bales, wood chip berm and silt booms. The placement of the erosion
control structure(s) shall be determined by the Trustees or their designee. All
intertidal construction and excavation requires the installation of a silt boom that
will retain all suspended sediments within the immediate project area.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in
preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney
Town of Southold
LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM
A. INSTRUCTIONS / 20]0
All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this
CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront
Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement othe~_,~
information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination o~
consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other
ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.
Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review
the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the
Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will
be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area
(w.h/ch inclndes all of Southold Town).
If any question in Section C on th/s form is answered "yes" or "no", then the
proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and
conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus~ each answer must be
explained in detail, listing both suooortin~ and non-supporting facts If an action
cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it
shall not be undertaken.
A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's
website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning
Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office.
B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION
SCTM# 1000 - 010 - 10 - 2
PROJECT NAME: THOMAS SHILLO
The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response):
Town Board
Planning Board __
Building Dept. __
Board of Trustees X
1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response):
a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency (e.g. capital
cnstmction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction)
b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant loan subsidy)
c) Permit, approval, license, certification:
X
Nature and extent of action: Remove 182 +1- SF existing wood deckI 22 +l- LF of concrete retaining wall
and replace with boulders, 30 +/- CY over 500 +/- SF under pier along edge of water, also construct 68 +/-..
LF of wood pile and timber pier. install a 6-ft x 20-ft float with associated 3 1/= x 24 ft ramp and restraint
piles, at or waterward of the apparent high water line.
Location of action: 'The Gloaming.
Site acreage: Parcel =1.2 acres, Pier less than 1/10th acre
Present Land use: Residential
Present Zoning Classification: Residential
If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency,
the following information shall be provided:
a) Name of applicant: Thomas Shillo
b) Mailing Address: PO Box 202, Fishers Island, NY 06390
c) Telephone number: Area Code 631-788-7755
d) Application number, if any_
Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal
agency?
Yes X No
If yes, wtfich state or federal Agency? US ACOE, NYS DEC
Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further
support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that
will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for
completion.
DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community
character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a
coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies;
Page 2 for evaluation criteria.
X Yes No __ Not Applicable
This shorefront modification project makes appropriate use of an existing waterfront access dock system
and complies with environmental design factors published by the NYS DEC, and the DOS Coastal
Management Program, Southold Local Law No. 6, 2004 and the Southold LWRP. The existing,
longstanding dock facilities do not comply with current environmental laws and regulations. The new
pier will follow the general existing ali~ment but be modified to consist of only one pier fitted with a
floating dock extended tie offpiles and raised to a 5-foot dock clearance over the bottom sediments until
passing the landward limit of the adjacent spartina fringe vegetation, then ramp to shore. Piles and rails
will be 3 1/2 feet above the deck. There will be no impairment of water flow or navigation
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III - Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria.
__ Yes ~ No X Not Applicable
2
Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold.
See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria
X Yes __ No Not Applicable
This project is to build a new pier and float in place of existing longstanding facilities which do not
comply with residential dock design standards of the Town or State DEC. In addition, a long standing
concrete shoreline retaining wall will be removed and more natural armor stone will be placed to protect
the bluff from erosion.
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See
LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria.
__ Yes __ No X Not Applicable
The limited 70 to 80 feet of shoreline at this site does not meet the definition of Natural Coast because of
the shoreline protection stone, concrete structures and the dock facilities. The new facility will remove
the concrete and wood deck/platform, redistribute stone into a more natural form and then construct the
new pier and dock facilities. The shoreline modifications should be beneficial in the establishment of
more sigrdficant environmental features by decreasing the amount of shoreline structure.
Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP
Section HI - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria.
Yes __ No X Not Applicable
This project will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinklng water on Fishers Island.
The project is being built at the toe of a coastal blaff where the ground eater will be naturally influenced
by the marine waters of the cove (Inner Bay). This project area is not a source of drinklng water.
3
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems
including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III -
Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria.
X Yes __ No __. Not Applicable
This proiect is consistent with this policy because it decreases the amount of shoreline structures and
raises the elevation of the pier landing to an acceptable height above the bottom sediments through
which adiacent tidal wetlands vegetation may spread. It is envisioned that the pier structure will be b~'lt
of wood. The NYS DEC prepared a study showing that the proposed pressure-treated Southem Pine
timber products construction materials are suitable for this type of project in this location, except for
decking which will be of untreated woods or composite (or plastic) materials in accordance with Town
Law 6. As mentioned earlier, the design parameters shown on the drawings provides a reasonable and
improved balance between acceptable pier and boating access standards and provide new opportunities
for the wetlands vegetation to spread. Therefore, it is believed that the pier will encourage habitat
enhancement. Attached is an Essential Fish Habitat Assessment prepared for this proiect
Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section HI -
Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria.
__ Yes __ No X Not Applicable
There are no air quality issues related to this proiect. No emissions will be generated by the dock
facility and boating operations will not chan~e appreciably as a result of the new dock facilit-? as
opposed to the existing structures and the boating operations at the Shillo's home.
Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and
hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for
evaluation criteria.
__ Yes __ No X Not Applicable
There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this project. The pressure-treated
wood trimmings from the dock construction will be collected and disposed of in accordance with current
regulations so as to minirni2e any harmful affect. Removals will take place as a part of the project and
all waste and demolished dock components will be removed fi'om the island and disposed of in
accordance with Federal, State. and local laws and ordinances.
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and
public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46
for evaluation criteria.
Yes __ No X Not Applicable
This project is being built on private land. The public trust lands and waters constitutes the area
between the mean high water line and mean low water line and the coastal and tidal wetlands vegetation
resources at and waterward of the high tide line. There is no public access to this site nor is any required
from private residential land. These environmental resources are being protected by the design
standards dictated by the Town and NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in thi~
area because of the isolated nature of Inner Bay and the inhospitable nature of the shoreline. The
reconstruction of the pier and landward extension above the apparent high water line are not likely to
influence or change this characteristic of the land but the new topographic features will be of a more
natural character than the existing features.
WORKING COAST POLICIES
Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent
uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation
criteria.
X Yes No Not Applicable
This project is to build a wood pile and timber pier for water-dependent, recreational and transportation
boating. This usage is defined as water-dependent in the LWRP because the pier is for recreational
boating and provide boat transportation access to the mainland. This facility will not adversely affect
other higher priority water dependent uses from being sited here, however, if those uses were not
residential. It is not likely that changes in inland use would be implemented without si..tmificant local
opposition.
Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic
Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation
criteria.
Yes __ No X Not Applicable
This pier is not used for commercial fishin~ or shellfish industries or enterprises. The project will result
in a demolition of aged and non-conforming shoreline facilities at tkis site and so this project.
conforming to current standards, is perceived as an environmental benefit
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies;
Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria.
__ Yes No X Not Applicable
This pier is not used for or in support of any agricultural or aquaculture industries or enterprises.
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP
Section IH - Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
Yes __ No X Not Applicable
This pier is not used for or in support of any energy or mineral mining or processing operations.
PREPARED BY Keith B. Neilson, P.E.,Docko, Inc.
TITLE Agent~_DATE 3/8/10
6
THOMAS SHILLO
PIRATE'S COVE, FISHERS ISLAND
NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
March 8, 2010
GENERAL
Mr. Thomas Shillo owns parcel 1000-010-10-2 off the Gloaming located on the west
shore of "Inner Bay" Pirates Cove on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped,
sandy gravel earthen materials, vegetated with grass, brush, ground cover and trees. The frontage
of the property is on Pirate's Cove abutted by Mr. John Ski to the south and Mr. Paul Tombari to
the east. The waterfront consists of rocks and tidal wetlands vegetation at the base of a short but
steep, sloped, eroding bluff.
It is the Shillo's desire to reconstruct a timber and pile supported pier. The dock end of
this new pier will go from an end elevation of 5 feet above mean low water (MLW), sloping
upward and crossing over the intertidal zone at a typical height 5.7 feet above the bottom
sediments until reaching a maximum elevation of about 8 feet and then a landing to shore.
Attached are application drawings prepared for this project.
This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to
docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York
State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State
Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to reconstruct a fi_xed wood
pile and timber docking facilities from the shore out into Pirate's Cove in accordance with
existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004.
It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence
and methodology.
The marine contractor will arrive by water at or near high tide with barge-mounted crane
and push boats. The existing pier will be demolished after reference guide pile(s) are set
for the new pier construction.
New piles will be driven starting at the new shore landing end of the pier and proceeding
waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier. These piles will
be driven by double-acting air hammer to a bearing resistance of approximately 20 tons.
This generally results in about ten feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum.
After the piles are installed, split caps (also referred to as split clamps) consisting of a
pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers ranging fi:om 3 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal
dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely fomaing a pile bent. Stringers will be
then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, three mas of
stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine.
The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to take care of an3;'
uplift forces that this pier m/ght be exposed to.
Thomas Shillo
Pirate's Cove, Fishers Island
Narrative
Page 2 ors
After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be
installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, th/s deckSng
will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine but rather oak, fir, cedar, hardwood or
plastic/composite such as Timber Tech or similar synthetic material with the brushed side
mounted up. If plastic or composite decking is used, it will be grey, brown, or natural in
color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless steel
flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a ~A" gap
between deck planks.
The over-water decking will mn level at an elevation of five to six feet above MLW or m
clear 5-ft. above the existing bottom sediments with a slope upward at approximately 1
foot vertically per 10 feet horizontally maximum, or less, paralleling as closely as
possible the slope of the existing intertidal zone until reaching the finished elevation
landward of tidal wetlands vegetation. At this point the decking will level offas a landing
and mn straight to the shore. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile.
The piles will be cut off about 42 inches above the deck surface and have horizontal rail
members mounted to them.
A rail of cedar, oak, hardwood or Timber Tech material will be installed for safety:
Water and electricity will be mn out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that
trickle chargers and / or bilge pumps on the boat(s) may be powered during tie-ups. The
water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light
will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the
boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the
electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the
hours of darkness, low-intensity lights (25 Watts +/-) will be mounted on staggered piles
or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up to the bank. 'INs
system will be manually or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that the lights will
only be on when necessary for safety of the users.
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITAI.IZ&TION POLICIES
The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the Shillo dock
reconstruction are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management
Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The Shillo site is on Pirate's Cove,
Inner Bay, and is characterized by developed coast interspersed with natural coast. There is the
longstanding concrete sea wall which is typical of at least a somewhat developed shorefront. The
developed coast policies are applicable as follows:
Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and
preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the
environment,
Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources,
Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality.
The proposed dock reconstruction for the Shillo's is consistent with waterfront
development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The pier is made of timbers and utilizes th~-
materials allowable under Local Law #6 and consistent with other adjacent dock facilities and
characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations. The encroachment has been limited to the
2
Thomas Shillo
Pirate's Cove, Fishers Island
Narrative
Page 3 of 8
existing permitted length to be consistent with DEC policies ~ the structure is as low profile as
possible consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters, consistent with the tidal range of
this site and the need to provide adequate clearance of bottom sediments. Lighting will be
minimal for operational safety and otherwise off, and lights will be utilized only when necessary
for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no long term adverse impact
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows:
Policy 4 - Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and
erosion,
Policy 5 - Protect and improve water quahty
Policy 6 - Protect and restore the quality and function of the eeo-system,
Policy 7 - Protect and improve ak quality,
Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily fi:om solid waste and hazardous
substances.
The proposed reconstruction for the SM[lo recreational boating facility has been laid out
and configured so as to be consistent with previous long-standing facility for the site and the
town and DEC permit requirements for such structures. As such, it provides adequate height to
clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utiliTed are consistent with
Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regard/ng environmental quality and the use of pressure-
treated Southern Yellow Pine timber and pile components in particular. Reference is made to the
DEC study fi.om the year 2000 which determined that the use of CCA-treated piles and timbers
was suitable and acceptable for the marine environment. Decking will not CCA pressure-treated
Southem Pine. There will be no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and
solid waste materials attributable to the new structure and demolition of the old structure will be
disposed of off island an in accordance with applicable state and federal standards.
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal
waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project maintains a recreational
boating facility for the Shillo's property without adversely affecting public access to Public Trust
Lands and Waters of the State, or navigation and so is consistent with this policy.
WORKING COAST POLICIES
The policies of this section relate to the following:
Policy 10 - Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water-
dependent uses in suitable locations,
Policy 11 - Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources,
Policy 12 -Protect agricultural lands,
Policy 13 - Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources.
3 ! ~
Thomas Shillo
?irate's Cove, Fishers Island
Narrative
Page 4 of 8
While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of
project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the citing of water-dependent uses in
appropriate areas is applicable and the proposed project has been laid out to make the most
beneficial use of the land and locating the dock facility in the most appropriate point of the land
where access down the bank will not require excessive structural facilities and can be
accommodated with path work rather than formal stairs and so on.
This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfi'ont
Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent.
In summary, the proposed dock reconstruction maintains the typical nature of recreationaI
boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The structure has been
minimized in size, height, and structure so as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar
nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating
operations from this site. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust
waters and lands of the State. It does not interfere with navigation, nor will it create-soil or
sedimentation erosion problems, it will only minimally affect environmental resources and in the
area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shoreline. The facility has been
located in the footprint of the existing pier where environmental resources have already reached
equilibrium so as not to worsen any of these conditions but rather it will improve them. The
height of the structure has been specifically addressed by raising the pier to encourage re-
vegetation of the shoreline by tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such
growth. The dock is in 4 feet of water so that dredging will not be an issue and thus further
minimizing adverse environmental impacts. Most of the Shillo's shoreline will remain in or be
returned to a more natural state as a result of these considerations for design. There is no loss of
valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project.
Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated
Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for ti'tis type of purpose. In
accordance with Local Law #6, for the pier and the ramp treads will be of wood products other
than Southern Yellow Pine. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely
impacted as a result of the proposed docking facility. This project is consistent with zoning
policies and ordinances for the Town. The pier will be maintained as an accessory to the Shillo's
home at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that
will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is considered to be providing
recreational oppommity compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the
site.
Thomas Shillo
'Pirate's Cove, Fishers Island
Narrative
Page 5 of 8
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF TH~ WETLANDS LAW 6~ 2004
The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of
other governmental or municipal authorities.
The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for
operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of
injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the
permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers.
The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, empioyees and agents to enter
upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to
determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit.
The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and
all operations.
The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that
the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance.
In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and
Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered.
Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS
DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS.
The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all
likelihood, or possibly 8 to 10-inch butt diameter CCA pressure-treated Southern
Yellow Pine (SYP), Greenheart or piles with new split caps and braces of
pressure-treated SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's
and more often, 3 x 10's with at least one 3A" bolt per connection, and in many
cases, two aA" bolts per connection.
This pier is a fixed, pile-supported tknber structure and therefore will not
adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating
water levels in Fishers Island Sound. In addition, the pier does not present any
adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's elevation is such that in extreme
high flood tides the structure's end will be inundated. The pier's profile at 5-feet
above the intertidal zone sediments means that for the most part this section of the
pier will stay above breaking waves. The structure's SYP timber materials
represent the standard of the industry and are specifically grown and treated to be
capable of withstanding full immersion. With the counections described above,
this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and typical direct waves
at high tide elevations with a structural life of 10 to 20 years. ':~
5 ~ f
Thomas Shillo
'Pirate's Cove, Fishers Island
Narrative
Page 6 of 8
The pier support will include driving new piles at 10-foot intervals to the
maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier ali=munent and
support intervals. The use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers can be
approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6.
The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier
provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails are
proposed to be installed on the pier for safety.
The new pier will be built in the footprint of the existing structures. The 15-foot
property line clearance specified in this paragraph should not be an issue because
the pier being replaced was permitted and has existed in this location uncontested
for years and does not represent a significant encroachment into the boating
operation area of neighbors nor does it project into the navigation way for other
boaters.
Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit identification
numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of
the pier for identification fi:om the water.
There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking, nor are any
planned at this time other than the power post and railing which are fixed by
function.
It is possible and intended to provide a five-foot, clear passage way on the upland
to get under this pier and that accessibility will be retained between the ALW and
MHW lines. There will room to walk under the pier at low fide; however, foot
traffic in this area is rare, if at all.
NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment
Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the
New York State Department of State. The following policies have been idemified as pertinent to
this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each
respective case.
Policy 2 -Water Dependent Uses - Tiffs project is to reconstruct a previously permitted, long-
standing and fully functional water dependent use, a dock facility at this site in support of
recreational boating but meeting current Town and State residential dock standards.
Policy 5 - Use of Existing Developed Shorefi:ont - Developed shoreline on th.is site is limited to
less than half of the shoreline length. This project utilizes existing shorefl:ont which has'--
accommodated a pier for years and developed equil/brim with resources such as growth of tidal
wetlands vegetation. The project will be to reconstmat a pier to make it safe and reliably usable
6
Thomas Shillo
'Pirate's Cove, Fishers Island
Narrative
Page 7 of 8
in most weather conditions. By meeting current Town and State standards for residential docks,
it is anticipated that there will be habitat improvements.
Policy 7 - Simfificant Fish & Wildlife Habitat - Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat
has been considered in the development of this project layout. The shoreward point of beginning
will be over or in the vicinity of vegetated shoreline fringe and rocky inter-tidal sediments and
should not jeopardize the integrity of existing limited spartina fringe outcrops. Studies indicate
that there is a slight environmental benefit provided by piers because of the creation of structure
in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will inhabit. The floating dock also
provides some protection for juvenile fish.
Policy 8 - Protection & Preservation of Habitat - Protection and preservation of habitat has been
duly considered in this project and the dock stmctare is being kept to its minimal configuration
and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the
Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC.
Maintaining the pier's northeast / southwest alignment will allow sunlight to reach the inter-tidal
and shallow sub-tidal sediments around the facility in the morning from the east and in t.he
at~ernoon fi:om the west.
Policy 11 - Mi~imlze Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been
laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage to natural resources as identified in Policy 7
above. The pier has been sited in the area where the existing pier has been located for years and
shoreline vegetative habitat has come to equilibrium. Removal of the concrete sea wall should be
beneficial to the shoreline species.
Policy 14 - No Measurable Increase in Flooding - This project consists of construction of an
open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects water flow and circulation in
Hay Harbor or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated
by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this
structure will have no adverse influence on those levels.
Policy 15 - No Dredging - Dredging is not required in this project. The floating dock system has
been laid out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The
depth of 4 feet as generally recommended by the NYS DEC has been reached. The waters are
protected enough that boats can be berthed bow to shore leaving the motor out in the deeper
water. The float and the bow of the boat will not ground out at low tide.
Policy 19 - Impact on Public Access - Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a
result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust
lands or waters at this site. The Intertidal zone is significantly covered by boulders and tidal
wetlands fringe vegetation and the shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or
enticement for public access in the area. The pier occupies the landward 25% of the waterway
width in accordance with US ACOE policies and under 4 feet of water depth. Thus, public
access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project.
~ 7
Thomas Shillo
,Pirate's Cove, Fishers Island
Narrative
Page 8 of 8
Policy 20 - Public Trust Compatibility with Existin~ Adioinin~ Properties and Land Uses-
Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been
considered in this project. Several nearby properties have small docking facilities similar to this
one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of furore
facilities on mediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development
tights.
Policy 21 - Water Dependent Recreation - This project is consistent with water-dependent
recreational oppommities policies set forth in this section.
Policy 24 -Scenic Resources, Impaimaem or Loss - This policy is desigrted to prevent
impairment or loss of scenic resources. The construction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier
will not represent a new encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources.
The elevated inboard landing section of the pier will be largely over-shadowed by the tree
growth, the spartina fringe marsh on the site on the concave shore lands.
Policy 25 - Enhance Overall Scenic Quality ~ The new dock stmcture will be consistent with the
scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above.
Policy 44 - Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands - It is acknowledged that the fragmented fringe
of spartina altemiflora along the shorefront is a valuable resource but it is very limited at this
site. The construction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier has taken advantage of the existing
un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the existing pier in order to avoid adverse wetlands
impact. The raised height of the pier should allow oppommities for the growth of the spartina
fringe vegetation naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier once the new pier is
built.
S~Y
This project proposes pier reconstruction for recreational boating access of property of
the Robert Shillo family on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS
DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project.
This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal
Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of
Southold Waterfront RevitaLization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and its approval
are respectfully requested.
8
Respectfully submitted,
DOCKO, INC.
Keith B. Neilson, P.E.
cable
NOTF~:
1. ELEVATION DATL~M IS A~PAEENT LO',M WATEP,
2. ~DE DATA I~ T~ ~M 2002 NO~
REM~ ~F ~N~ WOOD OEC~
~ OF CONC~ ~NIN~
500~F UND~ ~E~ ~ON~ ~E OF
WA~ ~ CON~ ~ OF WOOD
~LE ~D ~M~E~ ~E~ IN~T~ A ~F X
WA~R LINE
~l~ I~ A ~A~ DOCK ~ ~C~O~
SHO~LIN~ ~ TO ~ A
A CO~PI~ON OF ~U~ ~
~U~O~. ~ ~ N~
6. ~JOININ~ ~
~T: ~:
~L TO~ JOHN ~
~.0. ~X 357 P.O. ~X C
P~OJECT:
OVE~:~LL /::'LAN
~HOI:~F~ONT ~10IDIFICA'i'tON_~
LOCA'qON:
WAT'~IL>~VAY: ¢I~ATF-~ COV~
DAT~. DECEMBER 2.~,2009
AF:'F~CANT: THOh'IA.~ 9HILLO
A~ENT: SHEET 1 OF ~.
IZDOCId~O, INC.
My~c. ~ 0~355
E~ doc~sn~.n~
FI~HEI~.~ I~LA. ND, TOWN OF SOU'T~OL[D
~UFFOLK COUN'I~ff, NE~,V
~HILLO
LAWN
FLQAT~
FOO'f'P~JNT ¢' ¢'~DPOSED
-DOCK CONCEPT
PIER
FLOAT
/~ CU~:VE'Y by JAMB.~ BSI;~NAP-~O LANO\~U~:~VB~ING LLC
~HO~NF~ON~ ~1~1~1~
~I~H~ I~D, ~O~ ~ ~U~HOLD
~UFPOL~ ~UN~, N~ YO~
~HE~ 2 OF ~
5~ docko~n~.n~
/
N/F
..0¢' TOMBA~I
TIMBE~ F'LATCOC-~fi c~nd STEPS
STONE and "qMBE~
~EO wi~ ~P ~nd ~AT
NEV,/ 6' VVIlDE X 20'
FLOAT -
',IEV,/3,5' X 2W
/:::'/L.~ (TYp)
FLOAT~
5LJ~VEY b~ J,A/-I~ I~E~NA~O LAND SLJI~'V~'flNG LLC
F~.OJECT: ¢HOI~EFI~ONT k'IOOIFICATION¢
LOCATION:
FiSHER,.~ ISLAND, TOWN 0'¢ SOUTHHOLD
SUFFOLK GOUNT~, N~V YO~K
WATEi;L~VAY: pII;2~'l-~ COVE
DOC~O, INC.
~i~ B. Neilson, ~
NCTT~ FL.OAT P~E~TI~NNT ~L~
AT TO~ OF D~CK
CO~UOU~ F~OA TA ~ ~N
I I I I
10 5 0 10
-- CON~NU~U~
CONCR~ ~NIN~ W~ N~ ~E~ (~P~ ~ FLOATA ~ON
UNDER DECK TO BE ~MO~
MHWL--
~WL -
~ lO o 2o ~JE~: CHO~¢F~ONT ~OOlFICA~ON5
~CA~ON: FISHE~ I5~D, T~ ~HO~
~ ~U~ ~UN~, N~ YO~~
~ ' WA~AY:
~A~ DECBM~R ~, 2009
~C~T: ~0~ ~HI~
~E~: ~HE~ ~ OF~