Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-35.-1-24
NOTE: OF NY STATE ROUTE 25 EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON APPROVED SITE pLAN EXCEPT AGRICULTURAL FENCING EXIT / / N/O/~ KoNTOKOSTA / / / / / / ) 2O / / ~o SITE DATA ? \ / \ 22.0. SCTM # t 000-35-0t-24 PROPERTY: 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 OWNER: Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 TOTAL SITE AREA: 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. VINEYARD: 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC ZONING: FLOOD: ZONE SURVEYOR: R~0 Zone"X" Peconic Surveyom 1230Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. 49618 DATED:1993 wi update OCTOBER 21, 2009 VINEYARD N/O/F pEooNIC LANDIN6 AT souTHOLD INC. LOCATION MAP S21 '05'50"E OVERFLOW PARKING G~VEL i / / x ? / / / / / BUFFER IN THE FUTURE AS REQUIRED) 982.87'~5 S21 '34'40"£ N/O/F PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD INC. OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = t00' NEW DRIVEWAY SECTION PITC, HE~ 1'0 ~ LONG ISLAND SOUND NOTE: FUTURE BEACH ACCESS LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD. DEC AND '~RUSTEES APPROVAL REQUIRED / / 410.00' \ NOTE: The approved sit~ dewlopnmR plm shdl be valid ~n, a pedod of tlm~ (3) ym's fires. ~a~dals of sppfovnl u i~r ~,=~ ~oo.=~. I~-CE' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL Ol BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1" = 100'-0" ~HEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NO,: SP-' 3oI % PARKING CALCULATIONS \IS \ ~.'"" '~ ":~:"~'~':: ..... ~!":'~:;':"' :;~*';' '*" ':: ~' '. ~'""' ''''~ "' '."':" :~"~ BASEMENT FLOOR AREA. 3,349 SF ~ ' ~ ~ ~.,": ~ ~, ~:.~'.~ ~ '...~,-.~m'..~, ~, ,,~-.r' ~.,~'~:~: ~ ..~ ..... . ~.-....,%~ ~ ~. ~,.:~*.~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~.~./ ~.?,. ;., .~,7.,.: ....~:..: %:::..~-< ~ ..~-'-, :.~:~.-- ..... ... :~,~,.......,..,~,.:.,.~r .'~.~.' I FIRST FLOOR AR~: 3 349 SF... -:.~ ,..~. ~. .... ~ ,. c,~. c~..,:~ ~n.~,~.... ...... ~.- "-.~. - ~..-.;~<~%~ ~-.~..' ......... . "~ ?... ..... ,~ ~.~.,.[ .... '.,.. '~. ...... '. ~'.%.~., I SECOND FLOOR AR~, ~~~;'~'""~1' :T .~'-'"~ WEST ME~.N NE 823 SF X '"}}~',~W.7..Y;;,.c';~;~' ~:~:.=~x~,~:u~ ~,,..~ ..... .':[-V'.k ,:~.:' :':T~ ~'~',~.- EAST MEaN NE 898 SF ..... 9' ..*~%.-*ec>~,~;?. 4. ":~-~ =:;-~ ~,~:. ::-r .=~., ' . [ TOTAL: 8 419 SF ~ .... . -. '..~. --v- ...: ...... ·. h,..'~' ,. ~. ,~ ,- 'L ~%,- ~ .<.,~' ,~.% .:.~,~... ~,~ ~,~.,~ :.-' ' ' .~ .~;, ~.::~, ..~ .h..¢~d~.,,..% ~ .':~,~.=..,4%,,~ ~ ~, ~ I PARKING REQUIRED - 1 SPACE / 200 SF ~::~: ,e.. ~..~=~.~ ~ ..~:,-/.~..~.......~.*-..~,~:~] PARKNGPROVDED- 42SPACES . ',' '.,. ".. ,. ,.,' ...' . ~ .:'.,"'." '": ' - .'.'~"., ,':~. ,[':~.'~..: . ~,:, I '"'~'~." .~.:~,.~:~'~ .. ':~'<"~" 7 :,~ ' :,'.'L::,. -'-,,':~:'<~"%'":s'~ "~=:'?.'~."~'~." ' TOTAL. 96 SPACES ~ .... """'."" ~": ""'" ¢' .~' ¢:"/ '"' "',' ';~"' ':: >"" '"" "~"~'" '"'~ '~,., ...*'..- V..'.'~.~......~..... ~ ...",.. '..' '" ~---~~ :' .'-.' .'.-"'.'"~ ~;:~, :~, ~:~.;-< .~..~ ........ .... .......,~.. ,.~,...~..~ .,~....,.,.~<.,.~¢['~:,~'~, ..,. . ..~...~.,..,.¢.~.~"< :~:':-' '.'~;r *.. _~ ~ I~ * ~ . ,.,. ~.., = ,., ...~. -.., ... · . ~ ... ~., =.: ........ ,. ~.... * .,.,.. ~ ~ I ....~.~...-.~ :. ~ .,., - ,...: ~,,~ ..... .~.~,.'.; ,~,.. r,.., ,... . .,, ,' .... ' .... ~,...~ ~.~ ....... ., .,,, ,., ~..- .;~- ., ... :.. ~. ~. ~.~. ,,.~..:~:,~,~.~..~>7,.~.: .: ~=~,.,~..~,, ~=~..~ ~......;,~..¢, ;.¢%, ,,.~,, z ........... .... ~ , '.... ~ ...... :." ...... : ..... '~ ,' ...... ...~ ~- ~ / ', / ', ?. % . - .~ Ir~.. ...., .=7.~'~ ~.&',..~.¢,. ~ E*-~ ~ ,. .~=<-~J. I~.~.,:=~.,.~'. W.. ~. .'=" ; .'~.C, ~?~$1_. . .... . ............. . ........... - ,,, :~~~ ' ~ / ~ / ~ ~ ..... .- ~.* ,~ , .~ ..-~'~L.~ % -¢.~, ? - ~c.:~.? d %'.""~. '~ ~ %.'"'.' '~:.' .".~%P~.~.I .... .: . ~.' .'. :~:.':'~~~ ~ / ~ / L / ~. :--~. .~'. '... , ~,::.~-:,-~,~*.'.,-:~.:-,:.:. ~.~*.:':1 ~. ~ ~,.~-..,~;',~ ~ . . ........ .~ ......... ~ -,,.~ , . . ~,~...~ .....:. , ~,..:-... .... .~ ~ · .. - .,...~- ~ 29 - .... .... .,...,. ~:~ ~ ................ ~ ~ .%. :"..~" :' :."'-";.L: ~o/" X 30 J 'I. J+ ~ ,.~i/"x 30 Z-.':.rL~:.:>,.'~. :' ~ ~ q.- .................. ~ ....... ~ --~ ................... ~ .... .. · · .. -;:.-.-..~ .., ~ I ~,N [ ...... ~ ....... : : ' ~ ' .:'~?-"~ ':~ , i ,~ /~.- ..... ' ~~o~~.__ i · ~'... -:,."~. "~':, ~ , I / / / ...... / ~ ~ '~ ~" , ~ ,. ~.~............. ~ i "~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , '~ :~"~ ""~'.-%' ~ I I I~//~ ~ :.:.': I , 1 '" "'"" ':" "' = ' I k 3{ ,.-.,.., ... . ~ .-.. ~ , - ~ X ~~~'ll .i ~ i I~/ X ,.,--..-. .' ~ ~ ~ 33 3- ,, ..~. ~ ~: ......... ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. · . ~ . 32 - 32 . "-..,:-:. %-..;'. ' , ~, '~ ~ IL ..... ~ ....... / / ~ ~ ...... ' · N . LEAGH N~ POOL -:.,...-:.....:., , , U ........... /- :' '-.:'.'"%'.:"-.','. = ~ · ---~ .... ~a~ '] II ~'~ .................. ...: .... ,... , . % 2, /ll~_~,,,qL 2, _,/' EXPAND ON POOL . ~ U ~ -- , , '. "' ,... "'~ J ~--~ ................ I+ 2OI4~ ~l~i ............................ ...... . , . ~ ~ 25 .... -- ....,,; , ~ k ~ /~ / I ~ I ~ ........ . ,.., ~ ~1~ 42" H ~1~1~ I II ~ ~ II ~ I ~ ""~;"' ".' :~' ' ~ / ' ~ll ~ II ~ i I .:-'.... %..,',-.'.. ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ J 60 SPACES :.' ,.:~;...%'::' '";'~::~"- ............ ~.~ .... )) ~ ........ ,.~L_,, I ....... k.... ..... ~ ........... ~ .... ..... ~l~..~. .1':-~ . ~ - I ......., ,.:~..,,...~ ...-..., .,..-.,. :, · ~.,.....? ..... ..- ~,~:~'::';,:... ~p~-L~jU~.... I ..... ,.~ ................ ~ .............. - . . · . - ,. . ...... , .... . . - x 28 ~ ~ ',...*~ ..,,...~.. ..... ~.~.~,' ,.~..,-. ,,, .~,.,...~...,. , . , -,... ,...,~ ,. '.... *. ....:.,,.. .., .., , ~ , / 'x .-....,.. , ..... ,.-.- ...... - ........ ~.,. .... .~..-... ~...,- --...~ ...... - ...... .. - -.-.. -.. ~...~ , ~ ~ APPROVED BY ' X . . .'" ..' '. ........ ' . '. ' .'..' ~ ' . .' ..... '. . ~ ..'. .' ..... ,~' ~ .%: .... .,...,., L.-,,' .., ~, .',~ .,, L ..... :' .-.': ~. ',- ¢-'.'. ::' .."u.:. .... ~. ~','..~ .. '.,,.'. ~,'~. x ,laN, N~ "~ABD -~ . ~ . ' ....... ' ....... ~.' ..... · - .-'- . '- .~', ......... .... ~ ...... ,. mT~ ~ ~ I[- . x TOWN OF SOUl, OLD .~ ~ ...... ..~/.. ...f~ .... .. .. ~ .. . ~ ..... . .... ,... . ~ ~ .- .~ ~n . ~ x · ~ I ~ ,.~....,:..:,,., ..-...:......L.., ...:. -.:.'...":'..-:~ '. ~:.'~',-.-?....~-~ -:.-..~.-.':~..,.. ,' -'.', '~. ',;,.'-,L . ~:..,~' ~ ~ . ....~ .~.. -'% .... .. ~.-~..%;....': .... . .... .'~.. .: .-. ~ ..... ..~ - . . .... ~ ...... .~ ... , .~ ..... .-,- ,. ~ ...~ . .~.-~ ...... .-,.. ..... ~ . .m. ...... · ....... ~ ............ ,, .~ ~ ~"~ ~1 ~'1~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ · . ~~.~-~ ~ .... ... . ..:~ -.... . ... .... · ~ . . .. .- · .~., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ......... ~ . -~ ,. <. ..... ~ ....... ~,.. · ..... . ~ ...... ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ '.'. '.../..:.., ...:::'- .- ,.. ".,~.'.':.': .. ::-,' ... ' . ....... '.. . .~..','. ;-..~.. ~-~. ,";~... ~..,'.- .:,.,? , ,.. ~ / ............ I ~ .~.:-.~. /',.: ' :: ' ,.; -~..~:.* ;..,:' ~ .. ,.,...; ',....~ .. ',...."~ .... '.'~~~' ~' ~ "-:.' '.'....:..." L'L ..; .~" :'., ..:. ': ~. .. =. ~ ,,~ ~o='-:" ,' ':'.., '.~.: ~'.,.':;?'"'-' - .:,:",: ',, :'".-- ..'.:'.::'..' ~'~':~".., '". :. ;,..,".'... .... '~ "-: ."'. '-:,.'-:'; . -. ' ~", ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I .:, ~ ".:'":. ~.~ .-' :". '.:; ~: ~'..%-..:.~'L' .'~ ...:'":." ~ ~. :'~ .: ' % ~'~ ;." ~..'.X,~%~..:: .r'::': ~'..~::<" .~ '. :' '"": ~'~ "...~'." :" '~ '. :" ~ 01/~ ~L~I~ ~V~ TII~I~ I ...,.-. ... .. ~,.,.~.~.~ .....~.... ... .........~......~,..: ...... .~ .... ....... ~.. ..... o REVISED: Dec 3, 2010 Dec 22, 2010 JAN. t9, 20tt 1 '~1--. PRO J:7 NO: 0911 DRAWN BY: UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE GRADING DRAINAGE & LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NO.: S ~ ~ ~ H~eo, ..~ T~I~j ~o~j~o~ LEED CERIFICATION STANDARDS ';:~);} ~;~"':;('~' ~ ~,*r,~ P~NT LIST (Native Plants) ; .,::':.-=...;~.:~ ~ ~: ~~ ~ * _ .......... . ~'~ ~~~. ~_' I ~ ON ~ ~ ~ ......... ~.,,~ ..~-., .: .... ~ ~2~g - ' ~'*-:- -.'~- '.' .,'~i~ *E ~ ~ l~ ~ ~r~,~ ~u~ ..... . .... ~ ~,,~ ...... ~er~ ~, . ~:.-- - ~ ~~ ~ - Native O~namen[al -.-.,-,.-:..:--,,- ~ ' ' ~ 271 ~..:.,.::..t,:-~.:..:.: " . . ~ c ....: ..... .:..:. ...- ~._.~ ..-. :...:. ~~~:~t~ ~. --..~, · ...... : / '. Ill ~[~ I~ T ................... "-~'-~L~'::~-~'.~. :':"5~;':~ ~'--' ::: ~ // ,- ..... . ..... .., ~/I; II .... .... II RTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN r' ,' ~::.;.- ~:>~= ' :.;,.:.kc. ~H ~Tl~ / SCALE; 1" = 20'-0'' ; ~-'::'::"'~: :"";: ~ -:: , ~. . . - ;,--- ..., :.:'.7, .-. -~- ...,..- :.- .....,.. ~. ':'~; ~.. <.,,':..., .- .-., -.. :,.- >-.t ~..., .--.;',. :' ,,-.:~ . .~... -:, ,--..-.~, -_ ~ ,-' ... :~ .. ...,... ~ ; ~= ~ , ,' '~'*'?;.-::"-:'-.~',-?',:".'--:':' ~- -'-. '.~ .~,, --: .:-. - -:.-- ~ -~---: .... ' ". ...... ,;-'.- :~ '-~ ' ' ' '""'~-.-~' '-'-..*-c"- '" '~ ' "-' ' :..~-'~:.: ..~-..........~.. ~_:...,-. --....,: .. ,.~,.. ......... : .-.~ ..... .....,...:.....~.:.~-.. ,...,....,.~ . .~, ~~.~::~- -~-, ~',.-..--:.c ~-. '.-:-.--:-,:-'~:. ,'~.'< ~-< ~. ..... ;',=,~.::"~ ..~:-'.~-: .~ ...... 7:-,--. .~,' ;~'. ,:,",:~'{...'..'?. :~,:.'.';."~~;; , '- " :.,-': T-..L'..'.:?'~.,:':d ". ;;.;- :,~-.:, . .....,.. ....... .... ...... ... ,.~~:: ~..,...................,. .... , .... ~-- r...¢....,:.~--.'...=.,: ..... ~y.....;-.... ,:>.-.. ..::~... ~ .-,- .... *;.:..-~ ,..,-.:., ~:.**-;:, ,:.-.,..-:,..--,..--.. :,.-..- ,.¢... --~ .~v-- .... -~---'", .... · ........ - ....... - ....... ' .... ~¢L~ '~:'~- ~-.'.-- _,, ,.~ ..... ~ ,....,, .~ ..... . ,~. ....... · , ...:.,-, . , ~ .. , ,. ,~ .., ......... :..= ~[~ -~.::: ~ .. ~... . ,: .... .--- .--. .. .. ......... :.,- , ............. ..-- . ..... LD ....... . ............ .,... , . ~ . _ .,.. .. ,.~:,-:;. ,~, ~ so _ . . ........ · ...................... UTHO · : '.-. r~:.-:---'-L.:--' .-'~.:-= ....... : .... -~..( ..~..-.~..:;~'.-...~-~- '...'..L..-: ........ .j..zT...T.~.~.~. ~ ~ I~ I / / -.,. .... ~.; .... ~.........~..,..~....,.,.. ..... ~....., ....,....~..... .... ., .-, .;~-... .......... ~-, ~ ~ , ~ ..,'---~'..."~, -: :"-:- ..-~;"-.: '-;-:'*: - :"~ -' .~. '.?.:'~ - _"-~-.'V .':,. '...' .;: ,.:~ :'..: --.'- ' .,,:--'~ ' "' ' "' -- ~x~, " r :"; : ..... - - ~'~. ~'- ' ~-~""' .,-'~"-"~'"". ..... ..-'-'.:'"' .-'"-~'-, ". ..... ,.'--'"'-:~-- ",---<: .", :'.:~ ~ ~t ........;... .. ... .... ..... ....~. :........ ~.._ .:~...~ ....;.: .... ~.....¢ ....... .. ~......~G~ . ~. r,~ .,~..,~...-~....~. .~,,,=. . ;~.~. ..:.,.-~ .,~....:. , :.~,.-...~. .... ~ .,. ~..~ .... ~:~. .. ,.. .... .:.. _ TURBINE I ':~" ~'""~'":" ~'~'~"'"~""' ""~:'" ':"'~':"~";; ~:'' '~"'"-:'"~;"; ~.'.~-. ~.-...'-, '...,:;'~ ~ ~...~'..~ .... .:.-~,. :,.-:%-; .~,:~.'. -,~ .~ -~,, .,,;..., .:-~,:., .:. --.,.., .... ,. --¢ .-:-..~ -~...... I JAN. Iq, 2OII - ~ REVlelONe) el el UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE _ANDSCAPING & LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NO.: pOLr= EXIOT. O'~ POLE (LIPA~4~) 0 r=XlCT, f=l~,~ - HY'~P. ANT I VlNDYA~2 % x , ., ix, ,.. , / EO~E OP "'*'"'" "' ' "' "' '(' ~ ~ ~-~ x / TO LO~ / / / Ot~.AINAOE 'Fo \ ~:XISTINO VI · PARTIAL SITE PLAN ~?: ~ SO.bE: ~" ~ 2O'-O" ~x ~ ~OW~ OF SOUTHObB REVISED: Dec 3, 20t 0 Dec 22, 2010 JAN. 19, 2011 I- >. / PR-O~E~?O: 0§11 DRAWN' BY: UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL t4, 20t0 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE GRADING DRAINAGE LANDSCAPE & LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NO.: S ,j=LOOR IDT~,AIN~ IN = '~J' / BUIL~IN~ T/P EL 21,0 II"LTOP OF POOL / = DUILIDING ~ALL CRADE LINE ELEVATION + 20.q FT. ~A~TE ~ATE~ P~OFILE FO~ ~INE~Y ~ ' ~ NO ~OALE ~ ~' ~ ~ ~'~'~"~'~ SEPTIC TANK 2000 GALLON ; "'~"'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'~ SEPTIC SYSTEM ,.T.S. WASTE WATER ~Y~TEM u,T,s. WA~TD WATER ~Y~TEM" ~ ~ WASTE WATER CALCULATIONS ~'*'--~ ~PICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL ,,: · _~_ I. WASTE WATER PROCESSING N.T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM ~ · WINE PRODUCTION AR~~; h_ ,,::~ ~ ~ WASH DOWN OF WINE MAKING EQUIPMENT 395 GPD '.', ,' ~ ~ TOTAL WASTE WATER PROCESSING 395 GPD . ~ WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: WASTE WATE. S~STEM- SSS GeD GREASE T~P I.SE~LEMENT TANK: 395 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 796 GAL SANITARY CALCU ~TIONS,.~.s. SEPTIC SYSTEM (~) 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 4 FT LD) I. ALLOWABLE DENSI~ 2.L~CHING POOLS 395 GPD I 1.5 SF I GPD = 263 SF TOTAL ACK.GE: 39.78 ACRES (NON P~NTED ~NEYARD) use ~0 FT O,A x ~0 FT .T .OO~ ~.) .~O.OaEO~Oa~CA~ ZO.E: ZO.e W TEST HOLE EFFECTIVE DEPTH (t0 FT. D~. X 9.67 FT. HT.) ~ 303.6 S.F. WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER aY MARK Mc~N~D PLUS 50% ~PANSION (EXP): 10 FT DIA x 10 FT HT ALLOWABLE DENSI~: 39.78 Acres x 600 GPD. = 23,868 GPD. ~o SC~E SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK t197t D~INAGE CALCULATIONS: S.TE Oe.S~ CA~CU~T.O. T.~T.O~E WINERY: IFT. DARK BRO~ LO~ OL ROAD ENTRY / CURB CUT AR~ PARKING AREA 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD/Occupant) 3 FT. eRO~S~LT ~L DRY WELL AR~ X ~INFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR DRY WELL AREA X ~INFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR 5 GPD X 98 Occupan~ = ~0 GPD 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.66 GPDISF) 4 FT. BROWN SlL~ BAND W120% G~L SM ~ 1,5768F. X (2/12FT.) X 1.0~263CU. FT. (D~"A" 14,662SF. X (2112FT.) X 1.0~2,~CU. FT. ~' USE: (t) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL USE: (4) 8' DIAMETER x 12' HIGH POOL 0.06 GPD X 1,~8 SF = 89.9 GPD (1 ) 8' X 6' STORM D~IN RING - 25~ CU. FT. (4) 8' X 12' STORM D~IN RING - 2,026 CU. FT. 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) BROWN FINE TO COARSE 8~D 8W USE: (~) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES USE: (1) 8' DIAMETER x 4' HIGH POOL 0.04 GPD X 3, t47 8F - t 25.9 GPD (1 ) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES - 54 CU. FT, (I) 8' X 4' STORM D~IN RING - 168 CU, ~. 4. ~TAIL (0.03 GPDISF) 2a ~ .............. ~ REQUIRED USE: (5) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES 0.03 GPD X 565 SF a ~6.9 GPD NO WATER ENCOUNTERED APPROVED ~Y 307 CU. FT. > 263 CU. FT. (5) 8' SOLID ~ALL DOMES ~ 270 CU. FT. TOTAL S~E DENSI~ FLOW = 7~.7 GPD OVERFLOW PARKING ~ REQUIRED P~NNING 0OARD OR~WE~ *.~ X ~,.~ X .U.OFFFACTO. ~.aS~CU.F~. . ~.~CU.~. ..OdECT.OTO~.OE.S.~ (DW)"E" ~S,424SF. X (21~2FT.) X 0.a-~S42CU. FT. CRUSHING I LOADING AREA SITE DATA TOW, o~ (3) 8' X 12' STORM D~IN RING - 1,520 CU. ~. (D~ "B" 3,545 SF. X (2112 FT.) X 1.0 - 591 CU. ~. SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: SCTM & 1000-35-01-24 DAT~ USE: (3) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL WINERY: PROPERTY: 825 Route 25 (3) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES - 162CU. FT. (2) 8' X 6' STORM D~IN RING - 507CU. FT. i. TASTINGROOM(SGPD+2.SGPDIOccupant) Greenpo~,N' 119~ ~ REQUIRED USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES 7.5 GPD X 98 Occupants ~ 7~5 GPD OWNER: Jemco Real~ --*~-*-- ' 1682 CU. FT. > t642 CU. FT. (2) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES ~ 108 CU. FT. 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) PO Box 67 A___ ~ ..... ~ REQUIRED 0.06 GPD X ~,~8 SF = 89.9 GPD Greenpo~, NY 119~ 615 cu. FT. > 591 CU. FT. 3. ~NE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF) TOTAL ROOF STRUCTURE 0.04 GPD X 3,147 SF - t25.9 GPD SITE AREA: 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. ~IN WATER ON ROOF AR~ TO BE DIRECTED TO 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPD/SF) VINEYARD: 895,158 SF - 20.55 AC UNDERGROUND STOOGE TANKS. ~IN WATER WILL BE USED 0.83 GPD X 565 SF - 16.9 GPD NON P~NTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC FOR ~NDSCAPE IRRIGATION. LEED CERTIFICATION - O~RFLOW S~AGE FLOW = 982.TGPD WILL BE DIRECTED TO SAME SIZE DR~ELLS TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 967.7 GPD ZONING: R-80 STOOGE AREA X ~INFALL FLOOD: Zone "X" TANK 3,803 SF. X (2112 FT.) = 609 CU. ~. III. SANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ZONE ~K) "C" USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH P~L SEPTIC SYSTEM - g67.7 GPD (2) 8' X 6' SOLID WALL RING ~ 507 CU. ~. SURVEYOR: Peconlc Su~eyom USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES 1.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 967.7 GPD x 2 DAY FLOW - ~,935.4 GAL 1230 Traveler St, (2) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES - 1OS CU. ~. USE MINIMUM: 2,000 GAL SEPTIC TANK (t0 FT OlA x 4 ~ LO) Southold, NY 11971 AREA X ~INFALL USE MINIMUM: (8 FT DIA x S FT LD) MCENCE NO. X DRYWELL 3,803SF, X (~2FT.) -600CU. FT. 3,L~CHINGPOOgS(LP):O67.TItSS.F./GPD=~4S.F. DATED:~993 w/ update (D~ "C" US~: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOg USE MINIMUM ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 9 ~. HT.) OCTOBER 2~, 2009 (2) 8' X 6' 5TO~M ~IN RING = 507 CU. FT. EFFECTI~ DEPTH ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 8.67 FT. HT.) = 650,25 S.F. VIN ~YARD USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL ~OMES PLUS 50% ~PANSIO~ (E~): 2 - 8 FT DJA x 9 FT ~T {2) 8' SOLm W~ Do, us- ~o8 cu. ~T. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~ > ~ SITE PLAN APPROVAL REVISED: Dec. 3,2010 Dec. 22,20t0 Jan.19, 2011 OF NEW 1109 NS & NS APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: NO SCALE SHEET TITLE: DETAILS/ ~ALCULATION~ SHEET NO: MAIN Ef EXIT ,i ? / L~ ~ //:2 / ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ ~ :~/~~ I= ' ',~ ~ ',t~ / /~ m I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ P X - ~ ~'vOvX, N/O: 5 - 1 'q . * ~ ' nE RI ~ t~1 ~RBINE __J . / ~I 55 ~ I Io INC. N/Off pECONIC LANDING AT soUTHOLD / / / / / / $21 'O5'$O"E N/O/F PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD INC. LOCATION MAP TEST HOLE DYMA..McDO.ALD NO SCALE GEOSCIENCE TEST HOLE DATA (41612010) SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 GRADE EL:26.8' 1FT. DARK BROWN LOAM eL 3 FT. BROWN SILT ML 4 FT, 23 FT. BROWN SILTY SAND W/20% GRAVEL SM .~, BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND SW I NO WATER ENCOUNTERED OVERALL SITE PLAN -SWPPP SCALE 1" = I00' ~~. 100 200 300 400 500 GRAPHIC SCALE GENERAL STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTFR SITE DESCRIPTION Development activities for this proJerd will consist of the consb'uc~n of a new winery building along with air associated site work. The site work will Include: grading of the proposed road and building surfaces: installing ~e pmpesed drainage spoctures Installation of proposed sanitary system and water fines; elect~c lines; wted terblne paving of the proposed mad; consto~ction of the building..NI Impmvemerds are to conform to State, County and Icca[ standards and spaclflcations. GENERAL SEQUENCE OF SITE ACTIVITIES FOR THE ENTIRE SITF 1. Installation of erosion centrol measures (slit fence beders, slope stabe~lza~on, construction enVance). 2. Grading of the proposed mad 3. Installation of drainage sthJctores, sanitary and water & electric lines. 4. Installation of remaining erosion control measures (inlet protec~on). 8. Excavation of the basement and covington of winery. 7. Final landscpathg SITE DATA Site Area: 6022Acres Pm-Devetepmerd Runoff Coefficlenti 30.(]0 % (light vegetation) Post-Development Runoff Coofflcenti 32.2 % Soil Classification: See test hale Receiving Waters: Low pelnt on site POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES In accordance with the provisions of the USEPA General Permit, stortn water management and ereslon and sedlmerd control measures Including, but net limited to, the fdteWlng ebell be employed during consf~uctien: A. Exls(]ng vegetation to remarn shall be protected (by Installation of constru~o~ fence or other approved means) and shall remain undlstuthad. B. Clearing and Grading shall be scheduled eo as to minimize the extent of exposed areas and the length of time that areae am exposed. A maximum of 5 acres shaft be disturbed at one time unless written permission Is granted by the NYSDEC. Graded and sMppad areas shall be kept stabilized through the use of temporary seeding as squired. Seed mlx~ums shall be In accordance with the soil conversa0~n sewlce recommendations. C. Bare sells shell be seeded wlthth 14 days of exposure, unless constmc0on will begin within be seeded immediately. a. Seed pmpara(]on - ecatify soil if compacted, remove dedds and obs§clles such as a. Ryegrass (annual or perennial) @ 3(] lbs. per acm (0 7 lbs per 1,0(](] nq ft,) b. Cer~fled "Arcostook" winter rye (cereal rye) @ 100 lbs. par acre J~ ~he ~wner~parat~r~c~n~ractor ~s respanste~ for ~nspecti~n and pr~par matutenance of ~r~s~ c~ofre~ measures. Inspae,ons mute be performed by a certified erosion control specialist, licensed engineer every seven calendar days and Immediately after padbes of mtufall greater General Permit shall be posted al all times. - PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: TOTAL SITE AREA: VINEYARD: NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC ZONING: R-80 FLOOD: Zone "X" ZONE SURVEYOR: Peconlc Surveyors 1230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. 49618 DATED:t993 w/update OCTOBER 21, 2009 CHECKED BY:Ns SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SWPPP SHEETNO.: VINEYARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL SPDES - GENERAL 'PRIVATE s'r 'nNe I'AS'TIN~ AREA m~ _ r ~-~ I - ! r ~ r RAILIN~ ~ ~ ~T IIIIIIIII SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0" HEZZANINE I=LOOR AREA:&q4 SI= (NET) IflALK.v~y TOll.Er HAIN ENTRY TASTING, ' IDAR T AREA C. laJ..~-J~lN~, FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" BED IC, ASE STOR~A~ ,E BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" IDA.GEl,lENT AREA: 5402 5F (~RO55) APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL t;.EVIDIOND: JULY 2q, 2OIO t:~EDUIDI'~ITTAL JAN. (NO Ol DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1/8" = 1',-0" SHEET TITLE: FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO: 1 ~oo~ SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" [] 1'4)' MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: CEDAR SHINGLES (STAINED) ROOF: STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF DOOR & WINDOWS: MARVIN WINDOWS - ULTREX - WHITE TRIM/CASING VERSATEX TERRACES: BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM ~ESt.)Bf'41TTAL JAN. I~f, 2011 - (NO ~..E¥1510NS) NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 118"' = 1'4)" TOP OF WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OFSOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SiTE PLAN APPROVAl 1109 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE:APRIL t4, 20t0 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'~)" SHEET TITLE: BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBER ~~Of SOUTyo so P ~ is o~ us7l MARTIN H. SIDOR h0 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS H ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~t , ~ ~O 54375 State Route 25 DON DSJ. WILCENSKI ~~yCOU~ ~ (cor. M Sou ho1dYNY ~ Ave.) Telephone: 831 76b-1938 Fax: 631 76b•3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 15, 2011 Ms. Nancy Steelman Go Samuels & Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Approval: Proposed Site Plan for 67 Steps Winery (JEMCO Winery) Located at 825 NYS Route 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25, Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Ms. Steelman: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, February 14, 2011: WHEREAS, this site plan is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2010, an application for site plan was submitted for review including a site plan prepared by Nancy Steelman, R.A., dated April 14, 2010; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board formally accepted the application for review and distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments and the following agencies responded: Town Engineer, Architectural Review Committee, Greenport Fire District; Greenport Village, Southold Town Trustees, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and NYS DOT; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies having jurisdiction were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and Site Plan for 67 Steps Winery Pape Two February 15, 2011 WHEREAS, on May 17, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to the Suffolk County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2010, the comments were received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the site plan was determined to be a matter of local determination; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 2010, the NYS DEC issued a Letter of Non jurisdiction for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, a public hearing was held and closed by the Southold Town Planning Board regarding the site plan; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2010, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services issued a Permit (#C10-10-0003) and approved the project and stamped the site plan; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2010, the Greenport Fire District recommended one minimum hydrant with a 1500gpm, at least at the northern end of the main drive, and requests site inspections as needed to help with proper assignment of their apparatus; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2010, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and recommended the proposed project be found consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, the comments from the public hearing and those agencies listed above having jurisdiction were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on January 3, 2011, the applicant submitted a Phase 1 Archaeological Investigation Report that determined that no prehistoric artifacts or features were encountered and no further work was recommended; and WHEREAS, on January 20, 2011, the Town Engineer reviewed the amended site plan and Storm Water Pollution Plan and commented that the applicant has incorporated all the relevant engineering comments and satisfied the SPDES Permit; and Site Plan for 67 Steps Winery Paae Three February 15, 2011 WHEREAS, at a Work Session on January 31, 2011, the Planning Board determined that all applicable requirements of the Site Plan Regulations Article XXIV, §280 -Site Plan Approval of the Town of Southold have been met; and WHEREAS, on February 4, 2011, written documentation was submitted that stated that its operating hours of operation would be similar to that of other wineries located in the Town of Southold approximately 11:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. However, as is the practice of other wineries, certain events may be scheduled at other times; and WHEREAS, on February 7, 2011, the NYS DOT submitted written documentation that stated that they are in conceptual agreement with the mitigation measures proposed and that they have no objection to the Town of Southold issuing Site Plan approval for the site; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2011, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and cert~ed that the proposed action is a permitted use in this Residential - 80 Zoning District; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the action is consistent under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the site plan entitled "Jemco Winery", prepared by Nancy Steelman, R.A., dated April 14, 2010 and last revised January 19, 2011, including the following six plans: 1. SP-1 Overall Site Plan 2. SP-2 Site Grading Drainage Site Plan 3. SP-3 Site Landscaping & Lighting Plan 4. SP-4 Site Grading Drainage Landscape & Layout Plan 5. SP-5 Details Z-05 Partial Site Plan & Equipment Plan 6. SP-6 Overall Site plan SWPP 7. Floor Plans 8. Building Elevations Please note: The Planning Board's final inspection and the subsequent Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until after the NYSDOT has notified the Planning Board that they are satisfied that all the work on the intersection improvement as noted on the plan has been completed. JEMCO Winery Pape Four February 15, 2011 Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries, and to shield the light from the sky. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Cert~cate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative, must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. A copy of the approved site plan (8 pages) is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encl. cc: Town Engineer w/map Building Dept. w/map • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J. WILCENSKI '.o~~OF SOUjyo~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~ ~ Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY G Q 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H. RICH III ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H. SIDOR ~~yCO'nM'~ Southold, NY u1111 Telephone: 631 76b-1938 Fax: 631 76b-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 2, 2013 Mr. Constantine Kontokosta P.O. Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Approved Site Plan for JEMCO Winery Located at 825 NYS Rt. 25, +/-200' e/o Bailey Avenue, Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Kontokosta: The Planning Board has found that the requirements of the above-referenced site plan have been completed based on the site inspection made June 26, 2013, the submitted affidavit by John D. Hocker, PE, dated December 16, 2012, and the submitted letter from Constantine Kontokosta, PhD, PE, dated June 12, 2013. The site is now in conformance with the approved site plan entitled "JEMCO Winery", prepared by Nancy L. Steelman, R.A., dated April 14, 2010, last revised January 19, 2011. .This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies; Planning Board approval is required prior to any significant changes to the site. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Southold Town Planning Board Work Session -July 1 2013 -Page Two Project name: Maaratooka North, LLC SCTM#: 1000-115-2-6 Location: 17405 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: ;This proposed Open Development Area (ODA) will create a development''; area of 4.5 acres in a 22.5-acre parcel with the future potential to be subdivided into a maximum of 3 residential lots and one 18-acre protected farmland parcel in the A-C Zoning District. Status: Pending Action: Review Planning Board comments to Town Board. Attachments: Draft Comments Project name: Tidy Car SCTM#: 1000-55-5-2.2 Location: 3585 Youngs Avenue, on the s/w/c/o CR 48 and Youngs Ave., Southold Description: This amended site plan is for the applicant to conduct motor vehicle and accessory sales on a previously developed 1.49-acre parcel located in the General Business Zoning„District. Status; Pending Action: Review submitted materials. Attachments: Staff Report.. _ Project name: 67 Steps Vineyard (JEMCO) SCTM#: 1000-35-1-24 :Location: 825 Main Road, Greenport _ _ ; Description: This site plan is for construction of a retail winery. Status: Approved Site Plan Action: Review materials submitted from Final Site Inspection comments. Attachments: Staff Report . Project„name: Cornell, Clifford SCTM#: 1000-63-1-1.5 Location: 2325 Horton Lane, Southold Description: 'This site plan is for a proposed 42' x 60' metal building for agricultural/farm storage to include tractors, plows, loaders and hops on an 8.5-acre parcel in the R 80 Zoning District, Hortons Lane. Status: Approved Site Plan Action: Review comments from Final Site Inspection. Attachments: Staff Report. Discussion: ? Pre-submission Conference: Henry Mazzoni, proposed Standard Subdivision, SCTM#1000-13-2-8.2 Review request from ZBA for comments from Planning Board re: Ratso Construction, SCTM#1000-52-5-58.2 ? Discussion re: new liquor license request -Pace's Dockside, Inc., 2255 Wickham Ave., Mattituck (Strong's Marine, building owner) ? Discussion re: Local Law in relation to Amendments to Chapter 205, Public Entertainment & Special Events KIAIC E ~`f tl G R O U P CONSTANTINE E. KONTOKOSTA, PhD, PE PRINCIPAL VIA FAX 13 paces) AND FIRST CLASS MAIL June 12, 2013 Mr. Donald Wilcenski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 r _ ~ 9 Southold, NY 11971 j JUN 1 82013 ' Re: Jemco Winery ! ~ ~ e SCTM#1000-35-1-24 ~ A~` f ~..a ~iI Dear Mr. Wilcenski: We are in receipt of the letter from Brian Cummings, Town of Southold Planner, dated May 2, 2013 for the above-referenced project. Our responses to the items listed are as follows: 1. A sign indicating whether the winery is "closed" is attached below the installed winery sign. The size of the "closed" sign is proportionate to the allowable dimensions for the entire sign as designed and approved. 2. Please see the attached letter from John Hocker, P.E., of Latham Sand & Gravel regarding changes to the drainage plan. As indicated, additional catch basins were added to the main gravel driveway. The calculations confirm that the drainage as installed meets or exceeds the requirements set forth in Southold Town Code Section 236. Moreover, as was discussed at the last meeting, there is an argument that, in accordance with NYS Ag and Markets Law Section 305-a, the road drainage requirements for this agricultural use are unreasonably restrictive and should not apply to the subject property. Because any excess rainwater runs off onto the existing vineyard (and not Route 25 or any neighbor's property), the farm road poses no threat to health or public safety. 3. The gate will remain at its existing location, which is approximately 50' closer to New York State Route 25 than indicated on the approved site plan. This is necessary to avoid removing approximately'/: acre of planted vines. Response to items identified in an email from Brian Cummings on April 19`", 2013: 1. The road surfaces are complete. The parking lot is asphalt rather than oil and stone, and the main roadway is covered with RCA rather than Bluestone. These materials in do not affect safety or drainage. 2. The NYSDOT Highway Work Permit Disposition letter dated March 13, 2013 was submitted at the April 22, 2013 work session. A copy is attached. 3. The sign rendering was submitted to Brian Cummings at the April 22, 2013 work session. 4. The project is designed to achieve U.S. Green Building Council LEED Gold certification. As such, we are striving to provide landscaping that requires little or no irrigation. All planting beds and 43 WEST 54TH STREET /NEW YORK, NY 10019 / T: 212.582.6100 / F: 212.582.6047 755 NORTH ROAD, PO BOX 67 / GREENPORT, NY 11944 / T: 031.477.0600 / F: 631.477.0800 shrubs have been eliminated from the design due to their need for irrigation. Small trees and inkberry bushes have been planted around the building and in the parking area as per the landscape plan. It should be noted that the project meets all Town of Southold landscaping requirements as the site is currently planted with approximately 25 acres of vines. 5. The two pole light fixtures on the east end of the building were not be installed in an effort to minimize light disturbance to the Peconic Landing senior citizen residential community to the east of the subject property. We trust this addresses all remaining outstanding items. If you should need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 917-514-0116. Finally, thank you (and convey our thanks to other members of the Planning Board and the staff) for the time and effort you have spent on this project. We look forward to working with you in future. Sincerely, Dr. Constantine Ko kosta, PE, AICP, LEED AP Apr08 13 05:57p Latham Sand and Gravel 6317342318 p.1 • • C.ATHAM 35180 Route 48 • P.O. Box b0B • I'ecoaic, 1VY 7 7958 Office (631) 734-b800 •:FqX (631)734-2318 15eceml~er 16, 2012 Soufftold Town Eu~eering Department Sauces A Richter, RA ~ ~ y ; Southold Town 13x11 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southotd, NY 11971 Re: Modifications to proposed drainage at 67 Steps V17~mery, it1.2S Gteenport Latham Send & Grovel would Itlte to make the fnllowmg modificffiions to the epptoved draatage plan. T1e main paxtong I~ drams would be 4@l0'dia x 9'deep instead afthe 6(o~8'dia. x 9'deep au the phm_ This provides a valumc increase of 1,368 ga{bns. The over6ow parking lot dwins wauW be 2~t0'd~ x 9'deep instead. afthe 3(a~8'dia. x 9'deep on the p~ Tbig provi~s an additio~nat 684 galltws. We would atso 111ce to madity the main driveway dtaatage by inr~llmg two drywalls 10'dia. x 8'deep at ilre lowest point ofthe driveway apprarri~tely a5D' from roene 25. The roadway wider world be redaced to 22'. The swaks world be reduced >b 4' wide hY 12' deep and would he filhxi with straight'/," btuestone (porosity 0.40). The gravel drains (check dams} would stIll be iru~tatted every 200'. The drainage calculations for the 1,450@ mean driveway and a sketch of the new roadwaycross-~dion are provided bekrw: Required fapar-.ity I,a50' x 22' x 2" x 0.60 x 7.q8 = 23y86y gatlona ~_.~,w ~Y= . ti - lhyrvelfs: 2 x 8' x SI2 =8,192 gallons ~ cf ~ ' ;`E Svvales 2 x (OS a I' x (4+ 2)) x 1,x50' x 0.40 = ZG,030 gallons i Tatal may= $,142 26,030 =34,222 g;allors ' 1 Ifyaa have any tpt~ons, feel floe ~ coact meat 631291-8151. ~ f . Yours ly, r ]akrl D. Rocker Vice Presidwt r Marine CmstrucDna • th~,'dging .7'rera.~ Cesspools . Cuavd • Fdl r Ttr~oil . I3xcavaea~g and Land Developusent ' PERM 46b (4/92) • State of New York • Department of Transportation HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT DISPOSITIO/]N PERMIT NO.~yIJ ID I /~~9 RETURN DEPT OND TO,,~F'~,,G~ / leQl ~`I REG: ~TT RESIDE{{~~NCY~ Lv~ CURREN/T ADDR. 1'c• ~v~11X ~ 7 PERMITTEE:~'rX~1~?1Q~„/ ~ ~1Q~ ~ ~ 7 ~ZW`Wl n~ Y [WORK AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED CHECK ONE [ ] CANCEL PERMIT -WORK NOT COMPLETED [ ] CLOSE PERMIT ONLY - NO DEPOSIT OR BOND DEPOSIT AMOUNT [ ] REFUND OF DEPOSIT IS AUTHORIZED [ ] FORFEITURE OF DEPOSIT IS AUTHORIZED CHECK ONE BOND AMOUNT ~d BOND NUMBER: RETURN OF BOND IS AUTHORIZED [ ] AMOUNT CHARGED AGAINST BOND FOR THIS PERMIT MAY BE RELEASED [ ] RETAIN BOND FOR FUTURE PERMITS Q [ ] RECOVER FROM BOND FOR DAMAG~E/IINCOM'P/L``ET,wE WORK FOR $ DATE: ? ~ ~a~/1Gf1J' Res/ASST Res Engineer APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZED ACTION [ J FORWARD TO HIGHWAY PERMIT AGENT FOR PROCESSING DATE: ~ 3 'f1~ YVt7'r~I Regional rm' ngmeer DATE: ACTION: Permit Closed (Recorded in Highway Work Program as Completed) Forwarded to Highway Permit Agent ~'7 ~J Deposi /Bond Returne Released l Other: ~K~A3C'E~ I ~ I ,ti .._R U ._.P.__ a U CONSTANTINB E. KONTOKOSTA, PhD, PE PRINCIPAL VIA FAX 13 naves) AND FIRST C~IASS MAIL June 12, 2013 Mr. Donald Wilcenski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 JUN 1 `32013 Re: Jemco Winery 5CTMk100D-35.1-24 Dear Mr. Wilcenski: We are in receipt of the letter from Brian Cummings, Town of Southold Planner, dated May 2, 207.3 for the above-referenced project. Our responses to the items listed are d5 follows: 1. A sign indicating whether the winery is "closed" is attached below the installed winery sign. The size of the "closed" sign is proportionate to the allowable dimensions for the entire sign as designed and approved. 2. Please see the attached letter from John Hocker, P.E„ of Latham Sand & Gravel regarding changes to the drainage plan. As indicated, additional catch basins were added to the main gravel driveway. The calculations confirm that the drainage as installed meets or exceeds the requirements set forth in Southold Town Code Section 236. Moreover, as was discussed at the fast meeting, there is an argument that, in actordance with NYS Ag and Markets Law Section 305-a, the road drainage requirements for this agricultural use are unreasonably restrictive and should not apply to the subject property. Because any excess rainwater runs off onto tfie existing vineyard hand not Route 25 or any neighbor's propertyj, the farm road poses no threat to healtl+ or public safety. 3, The gate will remain at its existing location, which is approximately 50' closer to New York State Route 25 than indicated on the approved site plan. This is necessary to avoid removing approximately 15 acre of planted vines. Response to items identified in an email from Brian Cummings on April 19"', 2013: 1. The road surfaces are complete. The parking lot is asphalt rather than oil and stone, and the main roadway is covered with RCA rather than bluestone. These materials in do not affect safety or drainage. 2. The NYSDOT Highway Work Permit Disposition letter dated March 13, 2013 was submitted at the April 22, 2013 work session. A copy is attached. 3. The sign rendering was submitted to Brian Cummings at the April 22, 2013 work session. 4. The projett is designed to achieve U.S. Green Building Council LEER Gold certification. As such, we are striving to provide landscaping that requires little ar no irrigation. All planting beds and 43 WEST 54TH STREET /NEW YORK, NY 10019 / T: 212.582.69,00 / F: 212.582.6047 755 NORTH ROAD, PO BOx 67 / GREENPORT, NY 9.1944 / T: 631.477.0600 / F: 631.477.0800 shrubs have been eliminated from the design due to their need for irrigation. Small trees and inkberry bushes have been planted around the building and in the parking area as per the landscape plan, !t should be noted that the project meets all Town of Southold landscaping requirements as the site is currently planted with approximately 25 acres of vines. 5. The two pole light fixtures on the east end of the building were not be installed in an effort to minimize light disturbance to the Peconic Landing senior citizen residential community to the east Of the subject property. We trust this addresses all remaining outstanding items. If you should need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 917-514-0116. Finally, thank you (and convey our thanks to other members of the Planning Board and the staff) for the time and effort you have spent on this project. We look forward to working with you in future. Sincerely, r Dr. Constantine Ko kosta, PE, AICP, LEED AP PERM 46b (4192) • ~ State ol` New York • Department of Transportation HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT DISPDSITION PERMIT NO.~uI~ Ip ~7W~9 RETURN DEP OND O ~a~7 ' REG: RESIDENCY• v`•' C~v CURRENT ~A/D'OR. ~C~~ ~ ( PERMITTEE: V.!' ~~lt-a~~~--`-' a' `~'t ~ [t~WORK AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN SATISFACTORILY GOMPLETED CHECK ONE [ ] CANCEL PERMIT -WORK NOT COMPLETED [ ] CLOSE PERMIT ONLY - NO DEPOSIT OR BOND DEPOSIT AMOUNt [ j REFUND OF DEPOSIT IS AUTHORIZED [ ] FORFEITURE OF DEPOSIT IS AUTHORIZED CHECK ONE - 'j BONG AMOUNT ~0 BOND NUMBER: ~y RETURN OF BOND IS AUTHORIZED [ J AMOUNT CHARGED AGAINST BOND FOR THIS PERMIT MAY BE RELEASED [ ] .RETAIN BOND FOR FUTURE PERMITS [ ] RECOVER FROM BOND FOR DAMAG~E/IINCOM1P/LETE WORK FOR $ DATE: 3 -S ~Q~ ' ReslASS't Res Engm9er APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZED ACTION ~jI1~ ] FORWARD TO HIGHWAY PERMIT AGENT~,,F~O~R~.PROCESSING DATE: ~L.U.L? ~/Vl r~s ~ Regional rm ngmeer DATE: ACTION: Permit Closed (Recorded m Highway Work Program as Gompleted) Forwarded to Highway Permit Agent DeposilBond Returne Released Other: P - b~' ptav~ ~,taCh~n' ~ 9813 ~ ~x~~~,R zy.(119~ 4Y • g O.B~+~~~~'~~8 ss~) 331~b31)T3a''6~ ~lsrgy}1$ ~r ^ ~ ~ ~~fl x,1174 ~ ~ ~ ~ aa~.~m~~aray~as~ t°~ ~ ~~a ~ t~ ~ q. 260 i.n~ dr~x w, Cog y.5t~s*+~)x7 ~45~~.,'y"} ~a ~ x 1 P~@ ~ ~,1 ~Z4 ms's 3+f^" ~p~ i,^ ~~'M~~!`~;1'. S,:~g/t ~~~~~~Zq1-815"1• -rte i .a*~ ~,nyeB~• • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pf SOUlGG P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J. WILCENSKI Oy.~ '7Q Southold, NY 11971 Chair ~ OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY Gs C 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H. RICH III Qp ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H. SIDOR l9 C'O~uN ~ Southold, NY 1111 ~1 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE May 2, 2013 TowN of souTxoLn JEMCO Realty Associates P.O. Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Site Plan for JEMCO Winery SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Dear Mr. Kontokosta: I am writing as a follow-up to the Work Session held on April 22, 2013 where the Planning Board formally discussed the above-referenced approved site plan with regard to the final site inspection and determined the requirement of the following: 1. Provide a larger "closed" sign for the main entrance. 2. Please include within the comprehensive letter discussed at the Work Session and detailed below (Item #3), a detailed account and description of the storm water run- off control measures constructed on site that differ from the approved site plan. An affidavit from a NYS licensed engineer that constructed these drainage items should be provided certifying that what was constructed meets or surpasses all of the requirements pursuant to §236 of the Town Code. 3. The Planning Board determined that the location of the main entrance gate is sufficient. Please provide in the letter referenced above, a description of the location where the main entrance gate has been constructed in comparison to the approved site plan to document this change. As a reminder, the following items were required via email, dated April 19, 2013, and remain to be completed: 1. Complete all paving and gravel surfacing as approved, including the paving and striping of the proposed ADA compliant parking stall. 2. Contact the NYS Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) to determine all outstanding requirements necessary to close out the issued work permit. Please provide the Planning Department with written confirmation from the NYSDOT that alt work has been completed to the satisfaction of the NYSDOT. JEMCO Winery Page Two Mav 2.2013 3. Provide a rendering of the proposed sign for written Planning Board approval prior to an application to the Building Department for a sign permit. The Planning Board has agreed to your request to use only one sign rather than the two shown on the approved site plan. 4. Provide a detailed letter that addresses the changes you request to the approved landscape plan, explaining the difference between what has been planted and the approved landscaping plan. A brief reasoning should be provided for any difference between what exists and what was approved. 5. Within the letter referenced above in Item #3, please include a statement concerning the decision not to include the two (2) pole light fixtures in the employee area of the parking lot as approved. Additionally, the letter should address all differences between the approved site plan and what has been constructed on-site in lieu of providing an "as- built" site plan. Please know that this letter will supplant the approved site plan for the specific items referenced in the letter; a corresponding note on the site plan will be made. 1f you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, please do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Brian A. Cummings Planner _ _ _ ~ ~'nl~ PSG ~ly Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: ~ ~I~~~I I~~~'T~~CJ~~ ~`~U~l~t 1't~l SeSs CUYI Subject: ~q ~ 5 ~1~ `~I~l~ SCTM#: 1000 - - ~L( ` Date: ~-1P6'-l I c~u 1 Comments: ~I~S ~ ~-~-i~llr.~y i~o~k s~s~ ~ cal ~ rend S C~ PERM 46b (4192) ~ State of New York • Department of Transportation HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT DISPOSITION PERMITNO.~yI/I~I /l(IIp9~ RETURNDEP ONDTO ~~~C,4q~~~1~~ REG: ~TT RESIDE{~N~C,Y_~A~v`-' CURREN/T ADDR. •D• A~~X LO 7 PERMITTEE:~1~Xhc~v ~O~Ii ~~Sa~~Lc ~d5 IVar~? ~inaoL r CHECK [WORK AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED ONE [ ] CANCEL PERMIT -WORK NOT COMPLETED [ ] CLOSE PERMIT ONLY - NO DEPOSIT OR BOND DEPOSIT AMOUNT [ ] REFUND OF DEPOSIT IS AUTHORIZED [ ] FORFEITURE OF DEPOSIT IS AUTHORIZED CHECK ONE Q `YU BOND AMOUNT ~0,4~ 4n.0(~ BOND NUMBER: ~J~1 7DOJ•lp~ [ ~ RETURN OF BOND IS AUTHORIZED [ ] AMOUNT CHARGED AGAINST BOND FOR THIS PERMIT MAY BE RELEASED [ ] RETAIN BOND FOR FUTURE PERMITS [ ] RECOVER FROM BOND FOR DAMAG~E/IIN~~C''((~~OMPLLETE WORK FOR $ DATE: ~ IS ///Q}~hQ~~ Res/Ass't Res Engineer APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZED ACTION [ ] FORWARD TO HIGHWAY PERMIT AGENT FORS PROCESSING DATE: __113113 '?1 • YVO~TC/ ~ / Regional rm' ngineer DATE: ACTION: Permit Closed (Recorded in Highway Work Program as Completed) t 9 Forwarded to Highway Permit Agent orQ 1J Deposi /Bond Returne Released Other: PERM 46b (4/92) • State of New York Department of Transportation HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT DISPOSITION PERMIT NO. COI J I D I l ~tpg q RETURN DEP OND TO yl~~ / 1 Qa I I"~ ~U REG: RESIDE{~NCY~~{v~`~?'[ CURREN/T IAD`DR. •~•A 1~~1IX ~ 7~ PERMITTEE:~'C~~~ I1D~Y-+!1 •1LQ~ 1. 4L ~~5 IUZWY'YL ~nLCfiL Y CHECK [WORK AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED ONE [ ] CANCEL PERMIT -WORK NOT COMPLETED [ ] CLOSE PERMIT ONLY - NO DEPOSIT OR BOND DEPOSIT AMOUNT [ ] REFUND OF DEPOSIT IS AUTHORIZED [ ] FORFEITURE OF DEPOSIT IS AUTHORIZED CHECK ONE t' I BOND AMOUNT Io BOND NUMBER: S~yyoo3~ [ ~ RETURN OF BOND IS AUTHORIZED ( ] AMOUNT CHARGED AGAINST BOND FOR THIS PERMIT MAY BE RELEASED [ ] RETAIN BOND FOR FUTURE PERMITS ~J p [ ] RECOVER FROM BOND FOR DAMAGvEIINCOM'P/L(ETE WORK FOR $ DATE: ? I0 ~QJ}/~Q~(' Res/Ass't Res Engineer APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZED ACTION [ ] FORWARD TO HIGHWAY PERMIT AGENT FOR PROCESSING DATE: '?1• YVO~TQ~s+~ Regional rm' ngineer DATE: ACTION: Permit Closed (Recorded in Highway Work Program as Completed) Forwarded to Highway Permit Agent ~'7 ~3 Deposi /Bond Returne Released Other: ! ' • i • • • i ~ ~ i ' i ~ . 1 1 Cummings, Brian A. From: Cummings, Brian A. Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 3:10 PM To: cek@kacegroup.com Subject: RE: - Jemco Winery Constantine, Below are the five (5) items determined at the March 18, 2013 work session. Please know that there will be further discussion at Mondays (4/22/13) work session of items in addition to the list below, specifically: the gate location in relation to the turnaround and the drainage measures constructed on site (as we had spoken about). As a result, additional requirements are likely to be produced before a Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. Here is what has been determined: 1. Complete all paving and gravel surfacing as approved, including the paving and striping of the proposed ADA compliant parking stalls 2. Contact the NYS Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) to determine all outstanding requirements necessary to close out the issued work permit. Please provide the Planning Department with written confirmation from the NYSDOT that all work has been completed to the satisfaction of the NYSDOT. 3. Provide a detailed letter that addresses the changes you request to the approved landscape plan; explaining the difference between what has been planted and the approved landscaping plan. A brief reasoning should be provided for any difference between what exists and what was approved. 4. Within the letter referenced above in item #3, please include a statement concerning the decision not to include the two (2) pole light fixtures in the employee area of the parking lot as approved. 5. Provide a rendering of the proposed sign for written Planning Board approval prior to an application to the Building Department for a sign permit. The Planning Board has agreed to your request to use only one sign rather than the two shown on the approved site plan. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you and have a great weekend. Brian A. Cummings, Planner Southold Town Planning Department 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 t • WORK SESSION AGENDA • SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, April 22, 2013 4:00 p.m. Southold Town Meeting Hall 4:00 p.m. Executive Session: Town Attorney conference 4:45 p.m. Applications: Project, name: ~ Corazzini, Richard- SCTM#: ;.1000-84-1-32.1 Location: 6245 Cox Lane, Cutchogue , - Description: This proposed site plan is fora 2,520 s.f. addition to an existing 3,150 s.f., building for office space and storage on a 6.8 acre parcel in the LI Zone. Status. Pending _ _ , Action: ;Review referrals. _ , Attachments: Staff Report Project name: Pecomc Recycling 8~ Transfer II i SCTM# ~ 1000 95-2-5 _ Location: 560 Commerce Dr., at the intersection of Corporate Rd. & Commerce Dr., Cutchogue . Description: This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 I sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,200 sq. ft. of office space for a transfer . station use on a vacant 118,164.2 sq, ft. parcel in the LIO Zone. Status: Approved Site Plan ; Action: Review revised photometric plan. Attachments: Staff Report _ r Project name: ' 67-Steps Vineyard (JEMCO) ,SCTM#: ~ 1000-35-1-24 Location: 825 Main Road, Greenport Description: This site plan is for construction of a retail winery ~ Status: Approved Site Plan _ ; Action: ,Review comments from Final Site Inspection. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: Sherwood House Vineyards SCTM#. ' 1000-100-4-5.3 Location: { 2600 Oregon Road, Mattituck Descri tion: This site Ian is for an outdoor wine tastin atio & associated arkin ; p P 9 p P g• Status: Pending Action: .Review for a determination. Attachments: Staff Report Discussion: • Ovsianik Change of Zone Application -comments to Town Board • Pre-submission: Harbes Family Farm, SCTM#1000-120-1-3 • Pre-submission: Crescent Beach Condos. Storage Building, SCTM#1000-35-8-3.2 • Local Law re: Marine District II & Plum Island Zoning -review Planning Report WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, March 18, 2013 4:00 p.m. Southold Town Meeting Hall 4:00 p.m. Applications 5:30 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda Project name: Peconic Land Trust/Oysterponds, SCTM#: 11000-31-5-6 Historical Society,,,,,,, ! Location: 12395 Main Road, East Marion Description: This proposal is fora standard subdivision of a 7.2 acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 = 3 ac. to be preserved entirely as open space and Lot 2', = 4.2 acres including a 1.6 ac. historic preservation/accessory structure ,area and 2.6 acres of preserved open space in the R-80 Zoning District. Status: Pending _ . _ _ Action: Review submitted material & for SEAR determination. Attachments:. Staff Report Project name: Peconic Recycling. & Transfer II .SCTM#: 1000-95-2-5 Location: ~ 560 Commerce Dr., at the intersection of Corporate Rd. & Commerce Dr., Cutchogue _ , 'Description: 'This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,200 sq. ft. of office space for a transfer station use on a vacant 118,164.2 sq. ft. parcel in the L1O Zone. , Status: Expired _ _ , Action: Review expired site plan. _ _ _ Attachments: ,Staff Report Project name: Mattituck Plaza ,SCTM#: 1000-,142-1-26 _ _ Location: 10095 NYS Route 25, Mattituck _ _ _ Description: Construction of a 2,400 sq. ft. roofed over accessory structure., . Status: Pre-submission 'Action: 'Review draft comments to ZBA. _ . Attachments: ,Draft Comments Project name: , 67 Steps Vineyard (JEMCO) ,,,SCTM#: 1000-35-1-24 Location: 825 Main Road, Greenport Description: :This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District. , Status: Approved Site Plan Action: Review comments from Final Site Inspection. '..Attachments: Staff Report KACE~ G R O U P CONSTANTINE E. KONTOKOSTA, PhD, PE PRINCIPAL February 13, 2013 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 " D Southold, NY 11971 ~ °_-i ~ ~ D r ~68!: ~~j} 20i3 Re: Winery Project -Jemco Realty Associates, LLC 825 Route 25, Greenport, NY Southokl,Xown SCTM 1000-35-1-24 oard Dear Members of the Planning Board, We hereby request a final inspection for the above referenced project. Please contact me at 917-514- 0116 to arrange a mutually convenient time. Sincerely, / ~ r~G . Constantine Kontokosta, PhD, PE, AICP, LEED AP Principal Jemco Realty Associates LLC 43 WEST 54TH STREET /NEW YORK, NY 10019 / T: 212.582.6100 / F: 212.582.6047 755 NORTH ROAD, PO BOX 67 / GREENPORT, NY 11944 / T: 631.477.0600 / F: 631.477.0800 ~ ! ~ May 7, 2011 MAY ~ Martin Sidor, Chairperson & All Members Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: JEMCO Winery Entrance Location, North Road, Greenport I attended the public hearing and spoke out against the entrance location for JEMCO Winery. The new property entrance location would be directly across from my neighbor's home and disturb their quality of I'rfe as well as adjacent properties. There is an existing property opening for JEMCO Winery which is further west and located across the street from Bailey Avenue. There is already traffic there. It would have less impact on the properties across from the winery. That would be the ideal location for the winery entrance. The State has agreed that either location is acceptable to them. You have given JEMCO Winery EVERYTHING they want, can you please give us neighbors a little something and not allow them have their entrance across from my neighbor's house and make them use their existing entry for the property which is further west and located across from Bailey Avenue. Sincerely, Paul L„oLeb 1050 North Road Greenport, NY 11944 631-553-5255 cc: Mark Wolfgang (via fax 631-952-4967) _ - , a~, ~ ~ _ ~ _ I ~ I~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~wi i y to i, - I ,I,o„ ~ A, 5 ~J ~ _ f, A A ~ I i - ~ ~ ` E LONG pl/ _ \ a ISLAND \ SOUND i ~ - ~ I _ f' i a..,.,....-. - 3 x I I °:°.K , srs, J I - i ~ o 4 - _ 8~ o ~ r rJBY xJUP I~'~ Vf~ a sa'1°0 IK I _ r ~ ~ I~ . f .rim. I I ~ ~ I i SITE OAT4 , ~ . ~ 4,;,.,~ '.mm ~ ~ sctro• 1mo.>wf.a LOCATION MAP yferyt ' ~ vgGPERJY~ B]BF ne ]5 ' G. I'pn NY 11iN MMF IYNC Y•O.L n, °P/TK'I? MC 9W4E... PoBwRBi fyR xL,Mi ~..C ~ G for[ '94 sl-Ea.gEn. ez .:JSnr -eav ac. i' I ~ ;~f;ow Eo°`~.a,~:>i°~a~` I] :.mlu' i! OVERALL SITE PLAN XNING. R~]L f f _ I ro' Jx g~ G ]o~, , SVYJE~fP' • optic Br.'ve'~orr 4Je' em 4 Soufb f. vY flSif LICENCE NC •9ife I ]4TEL 19i`w'~cbR Jf.TCBER $f ]LL'S '/HFYP'+_ TOWN OF SOUTNOLO ' • • I~~ 1~ . • ~c~' ~ ~ STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAU PPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-551 8 www.nysdot.gov SU BIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. JOAN McDO NALD REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTING COMMISSIONER February 24, 2011 Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels & Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Your January 11, 2011 Submission Proposed Jemco Winery NY 25. Greenport SCTM No. 1000-03500-0100-024000 Our Case No. 10-17669P Deaz Ms. Steelman: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. While we understand that establishing a cross access may not be possible at this point, we maintain our recommendation that it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. There are connecting properties, other than residential, where this could occur in the future. We acknowledge the letter you provided from the Principal and General Counsel for the KACE Group, the pazent organization of the applicant. As the owner and maintainer of the transportation facility fronting the applicant's site, NYSDOT promotes all forms of transportation, including pedestrian traffic on public property. While we acknowledge that the applicant is not promoting pedestrian traffic through the site, there are pedestrian facilities on NY 25, to the east and west of the property that will remain unconnected without the establishment of a pedestrian path. The establishment of a pedestrian path could be reasonably argued as an improvement that is not an unreasonably restrictive local requirement. A pedestrian path is a much less invasive facility than a sidewalk, in that the establishment of curb is not warranted. If the path is not supported by the Town, as indicated in the copy of the November 9, 2010 letter from the Town of Southold Planning Board Office, then it is unlikely as well as unfortunate, that it can be included in the NYSDOT Highway Work Permit plans. We would like to make you aware that local residents support the establishment of a pedestrian path along your client's site frontage. They also suggest relocating the proposed access opposite Ms. Nancy Steelman February 24,2011 Page 2 of 3 Bailey Road. We have forwarded correspondence we received to the Town and we defer to the Town in both matters as the site access could be accommodated at either location. If the Town continues its approval process without any site plan changes, please be guided by the following instructions. Upon review of the proposed work, we find that the plans are acceptable as submitted. An additional three (3) copies of the plans shall be provided to us. This site plan approval for highway work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and no further revisions are made to the plans. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. Prior to issuing a Highway Work Permit, you must submit the required permit fee and Surety Bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by either submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Also, enclosed is a Highway Work Permit Application to be completed and returned to us. The application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond must be secured by the same party. The application is currently in the name of Nancy Steelman. All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $550.00 paid by check number 15586 Bond Amount: $10,000.00 Insurance Fee: $175.00 paid by check number 15586 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. Saari SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachments: Perm 33, Perm 44 Ms. Nancy Steelman • . February 24, 2011 Page 3 of 3 cc: r. Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold . Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf P~ ~ rn~ ~ k PAC ,S9R STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAU PPAUG E, N.Y. 1 1 788-551 8 www.nysdot.gov SUBIMAL CHAK RA BO RTI, P.E. JOAN MO DONALD REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTING COMMISSIONER Februazy 24, 2011 Ms. Kristy Winner, Sr. Planner Planning Board Office Town of Southold ~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Proposed Jemco Winerv NY 25, Greenport `s ' 2. " SCTM No. 1000-03500-0100-024000 Our Case No. 10-17669P Deaz Ms. Winner: This is in regard to the referenced project and specifically with respect to the November 9, 2010 letter from your office to Ms. Nancy Steelman. We are disappointed that the Town of Southold will not support the pedestrian path along the NY 25 site frontage of this project. As the owner and maintainer of the transportation facility fronting the applicant's site, NYSDOT promotes all forms of transportation, including pedestrian traffic on public property. While we acknowledged that the applicant is not promoting pedestrian traffic through the site, there aze pedestrian facilities on NY 25, to the east and west of the property that will remain unconnected without the establishment of a pedestrian path. The establishment of a pedestrian path could be reasonably azgued as an improvement that is not an unreasonably restrictive local requirement. A pedestrian path is a much less invasive facility than a sidewalk, in that the establishment of curb is not walTanted. This does not appear to be a positive or consistent practice to alternately promote and not promote pedestrian facilities. If the path is not supported by the Town, as indicated in the copy of the November 9, 2010 letter from the Town of Southold Planning Board Office, then it is unlikely as well as unfortunate, that it can be included in the NYSDOT Highway Work Permit plans. In our opinion, both of our Agencies have benefited from a positive and open communication between our respective staffs. We encourage the continuation of this partnership and we are open to meeting and discussing this matter further if you wish to do so. Ms. Kristy Winser • • February 24, 201 I Page 2 of 2 We would also like to share with you a copy of a letter we received from a Town constituent, who lives opposite the site. It appears that he and his neighbors are disappointed that a pedestrian path will not be constructed as part of this site development. He also has some concerns with the access location and suggests it would be better if it was sited opposite Bailey Road. We do not have an objection to placing the access opposite Bailey Road, nor do we have any objection to the location as designed. Based on the magnitude of the site-generated traffic our opinion is that it can be safely accommodated at either location so we will defer to the Town in this matter. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. Saari SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachment: Copy of 2/22/11 Letter from Mr. Paul Loeb cc: Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold r. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf Peb 22 2011 1:33PM HP LRSERJET FRX ~ P.1 l To: Mark Wolfgang - b31-952-4967 From: Paul Loeb, 1050 North Road, Greenport, NY 11944 Date: 2122111 Subject: JEMCO Winery Sidewalks and Street Entrance Dear Mr. Wolfgang, Thank you for taking the time to speak with me today. As discussed, several of the neighbors and I are opposed to the winery based on traffic, safety and noise. We attended the September 13, 2010 Planning Board public hearing and expressed these concerns to the owner and the planning board. I am very surprised to hear that the Planning Board does not support the States request for sidewalks since the project is just outside of Greenpolt Village which is a walking village and the completed project will bring in pedestrian customers and workers. In addition, I am requesting the State use the existing entrance to the vineyard which is across from Bailey Avenue rather then the proposed entrance to the winery which requires a curb cut and will empty traffic directly in front of a neighbor's hams. The homes in this area are sited close to the roadway and will be impacted by the cars fuming, stopping and starting. According to the site platt attached, that was provided by the Planning Board, the existing entrance is on the vineyard property. I would also like to point out my concern for traffic and pedestrian safety in this already congested and confusing stretch of roadway. Please consider the traffic and ambulances for the Peconic Landing Adult Care Community west ofthe vineyard, the Orient Point Ferry ttafftc, ttte residences in the area, the Portly Grape (former Shady Lady and/or former Porky's) Restaurant and Inn roadside parking and traffic, the traffic for the poorly sited Sound Road entrance and the traffic entering and exiting the increasingly popular Village of Greenport on Main Street. Sincerely, Qo~~ Pau! Loeb 631-553-5255 • aioiunosaonMOl N '°`'C ?sw vuw Q, a~rron i5MYX1 WHAM lA+~ IR~Mif4l uMM~li?w~J 'piiI~11N i 3.ii@ 'OW11 pitl YJWV2 A9~ T Y..6.ii., ®i~iII.MUi, avnw-awivs :awivwn - aaw. li DViK'[M YiY1+LOa 1~ili AMNiMq 'Jllilils WiM11~U~iYNi T1Y#pe~IlV~y~ bilU10 ~]p~{~ M41 Wi~H LLtlIJOW c ~ ~ orn i~~i11vJV 1 i~4i ~i =}LO ' ~r ~ • i~ >RY MiVA`O~M4 •1}U~M 1 1~~ ~ S 1 - ~-C / ~I~~ r ~M I ~ ~ r.~:l'. ~ 1 11 .r ~f~~r - , l1 ~ i~~ Jam-` _ \ 7 .A '1 ~ ~ I ' z _ nd - ~ ,vim. I i ~ i, ; ~ r Ll~ /W ~ d n LL MAII,ING ADDRE33: PLANNING BOARD MEMBER ~~OF $0(/~yO • P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~Q ~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair ~ ~ - OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS G ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~O 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H. RICH III ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI y~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 766-1885 Fax: 631 765-3156 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTIiOLD February 95, 2011 F~~ i ~ , , D Ms. Nancy Steelman BLDG. DEPT. Go Samuels & Steelman towN of soureo(o 25235 Main Road , Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Approval: Proposed Site Plan for 67 Steps Winery (JEMCO Winery) Located at 825 NYS Route 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25, Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Ms. Steelman: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, February 14, 2011: WHEREAS, this site plan. is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2010, an application for site plan was submitted for review including a site plan prepared by Nancy Steelman, R.A., dated April 14, 2010; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board formally accepted the application for review and distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments and the following agencies responded: Town Engineer, Architectural Review Committee, Greenport Fire District; Greenport Village, Southold Town Trustees, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and NYS DOT; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies having jurisdiction were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and W • ~ P~, , ni~_ 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue NY 11935 : (631) 734 6405 Fax (631) 734 6407 To: Kristy Winsor From: Nancy Steelman Address:Southold Planning Board Date: Feb. 15, 2011 Town Hall Annex CC: Southold, NY 11971 Re: Jemco Winery ? Urgent x For Review ? Please Comment ? Please Reply Description: 1. 6 sets of stamped plans for final Site Plan Approval. Kristy, Thanks for all your help. Nancy ~ 5 ~J~` F~-~ -1 ~ ~ pp I~ CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW t'~ 445 GRIFFING AVENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK Me~I~n~Addreaa: TEL: (631)369-8200 P.O. Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080 Riveetiead, NY 11901 F-mai~: c)iar(es.cuddy@verimn.net cebruary 9, 2011 Kristy Wir,ser, Senior Planner Town or Southold Planning Dept. PU EcY 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: 67 Steps Vineyard (Jemco) 825 Main Road, Greenport SCTM #1000-35-1-24 Dear Ms. Wieser: received 'y'~:.ir 2-ma::i da~: oil F'e kJrUa;:y i011. it_ dO P.,~ r:G address ttie conca'rns r_aiserl by c'ecbuic"Taiu33ng or other neighbors. - Li, should be noted that the w?eery itself was not oppcsed. The vineyard and winery is an admirable addition to'the area. Parenthetically, the principals of Jemco, the Kor.tokostas, should be complimented for their entrepreneurial efforts and spiri*_. They,' have significant enterprises in the Village of Greenport anr_~ the To~.wn cf Southold. Hcwever, as the Planning Department is fully ::ware, it is the special events use of the winery that _is the concern of neighbors. 'The park_inq proposed for the site, well over i00 spaces, st.ronaly suggests that tr.is will not simply be a 9 to 5 or 11 to n winery. In face, the spi.endid Harnorst.de Hotel maintained by the xor!tok~-etas in ~=,reencort lends itself as accommodations the night t~e.fox'2 or night: after for those .wishing to have parties and other ~v--^nts at this 4,000 square foot winery. What is troubling is t;iat a com.^:ercial use ir. a residential area would not have any ccnd~tion as tc hrn~rs of operation or noise mitigation. YGii T_' taepa C tme*1t.~ S, and piJS Slbi y `:he PiArin; ~'~g BOdrd~ S, aVOldanCe :',f di'rec;:iy addressing the nei.gt:bors modes:. concerns is ir,sr s~.'.'ve and puzzl.i:ig. It'xgnores past 9xperience and presser.*. _e~alit Kristy Winser, Senior Planner February 9, 2011 Page 2 A proposed 25 foot buffer and assertion that this winery will have hours of operation similar to other wineries is a deflection and does not recognize the impact of extended hours or excessive noise. No one has indicated why ann,-oval cannnr_ be conditioned open hours of operation between 11 and 6, except as otherwise permitted by the Town and that the winery would make every effort tc operate in a manner to minimize disturbance to neighbors. Nc one wishes to stifle business or business expansion, but the surrounding community must be considered. I submit this is part of the Planning function and invite your attention. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy ' CRC/cp cc: Martin H. Sidor Planning Board Chairman • ~ Page 1 of 1 I,{ , ~ Winner, Kristy From: mek@kacegroup.com Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:02 PM To: Winner, Kristy Subject: [SPAM] - 67 Steps/Jemco Winery Kristy, In response to your 2/3/11 email to Nancy Steelman re: expected operating hours, please note for your file that, at this time, the Jemco Winery expects that its operating hours will be similaz to hours kept by other wineries located in [he Town of Southold (i.e., approximately 11:OOam to 6:OOpm). However, as is the practice of other wineries, certain events may be scheduled at other times. Feel free to call me at (917) 750-6547 with any questions. Best, Michael E. Kontokosta, Esq. The KACE Group 755 North Road P.O. Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 TEL: (631) 477-0600 FAX: (631) 477-0800 FEB -8 2411 j z/8/zol l Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 12:13 PM To: 'charles.cuddy@verizon.net' Subject: 67 Steps Vineyard (Jemco) Hi Charles, As discussed during our phone conversation and in response to your letter dated February 4, 2011, a concern was raised regarding hours of operation and noise after hours. This concern was discussed at the October 18, 2010 work session whereas, it was mentioned by the applicant that hours of operation would be from 11 am- 6pm. However, as your aware this information was not part of the record from the public hearing and as such, I have included documentation from the applicant that will be part of the file provided below. In addition the Planning Board has required a 25-foot buffer along the east side of the site along your clients property. In response to your 2/3/11 email to Nancy Steelman re: expected operating hours, please note for your file that, at this time, the Jemco Winery expects that its operating hours will be similaz to hours kept by other wineries located in the Town of Southold (i.e., approximately 1 I :OOam to 6:OOpm). However, as is the practice of other wineries, certain events may be scheduled at other times. I hope this information is useful. Let me know'rf you have further questions. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Kristy.W inser(a~town.southold.nv.us 1 Page 1 of 1 • • Winser, Kristy From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 2:53 PM To: Winser, Kristy; Bill Cremers (billcre@optonline.net); Don Wilcenski (don@briarcliffsod.com); James Rich (JamesRich3@optonline.net); Kenneth Edwards (E-mail); Martin Sidor (E-mail) Subject: FW: Jemco Winery, NYSDOT Case # 17669P Mark Wolfgang says that they have no major issues that would change the site plan, so we don't need to wait for their actual permit to be issued. I have printed the below for the file. From: Wolfgang, Mark (DOT) [mailto:mwolfgang@dotstate.ny.us] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 2:40 PM To: Lanza, Heather Subject: Jemco Winery, NYSDOT Case # 17669P Good afternoon Heather, I hope that all is well with you. We are still reviewing the plans for the subject site. That applicant has contacted us concerning his desire to attain site plan approvals from the Town so he can move forward with the Town process. Inasmuch as we are in conceptual agreement with the mitigation measures proposed and believe that all involved are working diligently towards a resolution that will not compromise public safety on the State highway, we have no objection to the Town of Southold issuing Site Plan approval for this site. In order to insure that all public safety concerns relating to traffic have been addressed in the final site plans, please have the Building Department contact us prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Please let me know if you need anything else from us concerning this matter. I anticipate that our plan review will be completed before the end of the week and we will be issuing a formal letter so that he can proceed with the Highway Work Permit process. Thank you, Mark Mark D. Wolfgang Civil Engineer I NYSDOT Traffic Engineering & Safety 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Rm 6A-7 Hauppauge, NY 11788 Office (631) 952-7973 Fax (631) 952-4967 Mobile (631) 978-1671 2/8/2011 P~t~ CHARLES R. CUDDY , I,t ATTORNEY AT L AW 1~~ 445 GRIFFINC. AV ENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK Mailia~ Address: TEL: (631)369-8200 F.o. Box 1542 February 4, 2011 PAX: (~1> Riverhead, NY 11901 E-mail: clrarles.cuddy@verizon.net Martin H. Sidor, Planning Boazd Chairman Southold Town PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 119?1 Re: 67 Steps Vineyard (Jemco) 825 Main Road, Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Deaz Mr. Sidor: When I attended the public hearing for the site plan in September 2010, a number of concerns were raised by the local residents including my client, Peconic Landing at Southold, Inc. As you will recall Peconic Landing residences aze within a few hundred Feet of the proposed winery. A major concern of my client and others present at that meeting related to the hours of operation and noise which could emanate from functions at the winery. Following the meeting I was assured these issues would be addressed. When the revised site plan was being discussed at the work session on January 31, 2011, there seemed to be an agreement that the site plan was satisfactory, however, no mention was made of any condition as to the hours of operation or mitigation of the noise level from events held at the winery. It is now my understanding that the applicant has indicated that it will not be open after dazk. Nevertheless, I would anticipate this would be a condition of approval and also that there would be a further condition that the winery site would operate in a manner to minimize disturbance to neighbors. Very truly yours, Charles R. CuddyG~~~~/~ CRC:ik -7 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, January 31, 2011 4:00 g.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications: Protect name: Metro PCS at Penny ,Lumber SCTM# ' 1000 141 3-38.1 , ,Location: a 12585 Sound Ave, Mattituck Description: ,This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to I affix public utility wireless antenna at a height of 75 feet to the outside of an existing 100' foot flag pole and install related equipment on the ground at the premises located on a 3.8 acre parcel 400 feet east of Lipco Road in the LI Zoning District Status: Site Plan and Special Exception Action: :Applicant's representative requests a meeting to up-date the Planning .Board on the status of the landscaping. _ Attachments: Staff Report Project name: 67 Steps Vineyard ~Jemco) SCTM#: 1000-35-1-24 ,Location: 825 Main Road, Greenport Description: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning Distract. I Status: !Site Plan Review Action: Review Staff Report and site plan. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: Price, Mary Ann SCTM# , 1000-140-2-18 Location: ` 730 Love Lane, Mattituck Description: ZBA Special Exception consideration for a Flea Market having 28 _ a individual vendors Status: ZBA Request for Comments Action: ;Review draft comments. .Attachments: Draft Comments, Project name: Winston, Eve SCTM#: 1000-105-1-4 .Location: 3450 Private Road #13, Mattituck Description: This proposal is to subdivide a 5.58 acre parcel into two lots, where Lot 1= 1.84 acres (80,003 s.f.) and Lot 2 = 3.7 acres (163,044 s.f.) in the R- 80 Zoning District. Status: Open Action: Review submission of revised map highlighting alternate access and trees. Attachments: Staff Report • CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AV ENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK Mailing Address: TEl.: l(~ll P.O. Bax 1542 FAX: (631) 3b9-90£0 Riverhead, NY 11901 .lanllary 13, 2011 E-mail: c)zarlee.cudrly@verizon.net Ms. Kristy M. Winser, Senior Planner Southold Planning Department Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Tax Lot# 1000-35-01-24-Winery Tasting Room Deaz Ms. Winser: Several months ago the owner of the above lot applied for a winery adjacent to L.i. Sound. A number of reservations were voiced by local residents, including my client, Peconic Landing at Southold, Ina Would you please let me know the status of this application. Very truly yours, sA~ t 9 2o~t Chazles R. Cuddy CRC/ik Encls. T ~ ~ P~ KIAICIE G R O U P Michael E. Kontokosta esa. %UNCNll January 11, 2011 Mr. Mark Wolfgang NYSDOT, Region 10 250 Veteran's Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Re: Proposed Jemco Winery, NY 25, Greenport.(the "Project") Case No.: 10-17669P SCTM: 1000-03500-0100-024000 J1~~ l g 2011 Dear Mr. Wolfgang: I am the Principal and General Counsel of The KACE Group, the parent organization of Jemco Realty Associates, LLC, the applicant herein. I am in receipt of Mr. Sheik A. Saad's Januazy 3, 2011 letter to Ms. Nancy Steelman.regazding the Project. In that letter, Mr. Saad requests that the Southold Town Planning Boazd (the "Planning Board") "reconsider" its decision not to require the development of a 575 foot pedestrian path along NY Route 25 at the south of the property. We believe that the Planning Board's local determination is proper and Mr. Saad's repeated requests for such path are unreasonable as the property is currently a working farm included in a certified Agricultural District for purposes of Section 301 of the New York State Agriculture & Markets Law. As such, the property is entitled to receive protection against unreasonably restrictive local regulations or requirements which have the'effect of impeding active agricultural uses. Moreover, I am concerned that Mr. Saad's emphasis on pedestrian access to the Project is misguided in that it incorrectly assumes that pedestrian access to the Project is encouraged, needed or wanted. As the site plan shows, the proposed winery structure is at the rear of the property more the 1500 feet from NY Route 25. Between the winery structure and NY Route 25 is a working farm planted with in excess of 20 acres of vineyazd. A working farm requires numerous daily tasks which can be hazardous to pedestrians. Because of such risks, we will not encourage pedestrian access to the winery. Page 1 of 2 THE KACE GROUP 43 WEST 54TH STREET / NEW YORK, NY 10019 /TEL: 212.582.6100 /FAX: 212.582.6047 755 NORTH ROAD, P.O. BOX 67 / GREENPORT, NY. 11944 /TEL: 631.477.0600 /FAX: 631.477.0800 January 11, 2010 Page 2 of 2 We respectfully request that the NYSDOT respect the determination of the Planning Board and £malize its review and processing of this application without further delay. Sincer 1 , hael Kontokosta, Esq. Jemco Realty Associates LLC, Principal cc: .Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Kristy Winner, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold Page 1 of 1 • • Winser, Kristy From: Nancy Steelman [nancy@samuelsandsteelman.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:33 PM To: Richter, Jamie Cc: Winser, Kristy Subject: Re: Attachments Thanks Jamie...... Original Message From: Richter. Jamie To: Nanc~Steelman Cc: Winse~_KrstX Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:28 PM Subject: RE: Attachments Nancy: I was in the process of asking for the updated detail when you sent your "Opps"........ This detail and the proposed locations of rock drain I check dams appear to be satisfactory. Please modify your plans accordingly and submit the appropriate number of sets to the Planning Board for a formal review. Jamie From: Nancy Steelman [mailto:nancy@samuelsandsteelman.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:22 PM To: Richter, Jamie Subject: Attachments opps....here are the attachments. Samuels 8 Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY, 11935 631 7346405 www. sam ue I s andstee Im an. com 2/14/2011 Page 1 of 2 • • Winser, Kristy From: Richter, Jamie Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:35 PM To: Nancy Steelman Cc: Winser, Kristy Subject: RE: Jemco Nancy: I have looked at the latest detail. Is it possible to have short sections of Gravel /Rip-Rap installed within the bottom of the drainage Swale? Say 18" to 24" Wide; to a depth which encounters sand or other well draining soils. This stone sections can be 20' long and be spaced every 200' along the swale. If these stone sections were installed 6" above the bottom of the 18" deep Swale they would also act as a check dam. This would also control water velocities in the swales to prevent erosion during the time of year when there is minimal vegetation growing. As you can see, I am still concerned that a roadway which is 1500' in length will generate more runoff than the grass Swale can handle. If heavy rainfalls occur during times of cold weather or frozen ground, there may be a failure at the natural low point on property. Let me know what you think. Jamie From: Nancy Steelman [mailto:nancy@samuelsandsteelman.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:25 AM To: Richter, Jamie Cc: Winser, Kristy Subject: Re: Jemco Jamie, I have attached a revised Site Plan and Detail for your review. Let us know if this works. Thanks, Nancy Original Message From: Richter Jamie To: Nancy Steelman Cc: Winser, Kristy Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:45 AM Subject: RE: Jemco Hi Nancy: I have looked at the proposed drainage Swale detail for the Jemco Project. I would feel more comfortable with a deeper Swale section. I am not sure that a 6" deep Swale will maintain itself over a long period of time. It appears to be too shallow. 2/14/2011 • Page 2 of 2 The proposed 8' width for the Swale is more than sufficient but I feel that the depth should be greater. Will this Swale be entirely planted with grass or will there be a section of gravel at the bottom? Will the bottom of the Swale be thick topsoil or a porous, well draining soil? I would think that a Swale needs to be at least 18" deep, if not deeper. A strip of stone or cross section of gravel at the bottom of the Swale would increase its drainage capability significantly. Another option would be to propose landscape planting such as wild flower or other native grasses to slow down runoff. This will give storm water time to recharge within the Swale areas. I think the Swale detail needs additional information to be more comprehensive. The detail should be amended and noted in a manner that will provide a cross section that can be easily maintained. However, this normal maintenance must be provided without compromising the effectiveness of the Swale. Cutting grass in an 8' wide Swale area that is only 6' deep may become ineffective in a relatively short period of time. Jamie James A. Richter Office of the Engineer Town of Southold 631-765-1560 From: Nancy Steelman [mailto:nancy@samuelsandsteelman.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:04 AM To: Richter, Jamie Subject: Jemco Jamie, Let me know if you have any questions and if this works for you. Thanks for your help, Nancy Samuels 8 Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY, 11935 631 734-6405 www.samuelsandsteelman.com 2/14/2011 5WALE DRIVEWAY 5WALE NEW GRAVEL DRIVEWAY (w/ GRONPU PITCHED TO SW14LE DRAINAGE SWALE AT EDGE OF NEW DRIVEWAY PITGI~D TO LOW POINT ON PROPERrr NEW DRIVEWAY SECTION ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~e„a' ~ STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY H AU PPAUG E, N.Y. 1 7 788-551 8 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTh P.E. STANLEY GEE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTING COMMISSIONER January 5, 2011 Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels & Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Your November 12.2010 Submission Proposed Jemco Winery ,JE,'; 1 1 2 Y 25 Green ort TM No.1000-03500-0100-024000 Our Case No. 10-17669P Dear Ms. Steelman: This is in regazd to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. While we understand that existing cross access may not be possible to establish at this point we maintain our recommendation that if this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. 2. We acknowledge the copy of the letter you provided from the Planning Board Office regazding the sidewalk issue and their position that they will not require development of the path. We note that there is a significant section of sidewalk that connects to this site on the east side. It is likely that the residents of the residential community along Brecknock Road will visit the new Winery. We also note that there is a dining facility to the west that also has sidewalk. We acknowledge that this is separated from the Winery parcel by a small residential property that currently does not have sidewalk; however, it is likely that there will be pedestrian activity between the patrons of the restaurant and the winery. This section of NY 25 is also known as bike route NY 25. The shoulder areas are used by many bicycle travelers. The development of a pedestrian path will provide a safe means for pedestrian travel by removing them from the shoulder area and separating them from vehiculaz and bicycle traffic. We maintain our recommendation that this site connect to the existing sidewalk east of the proposed site by building a pedestrian path instead of • Ms. Nancy Steelman ~ • January 5, 2011 Page 2 of 2 sidewalk to maintain the rural character of the azea. By copy of this letter we request that the Planning Boazd Office re-consider this issue. 3. We will require the entire width of the NY 25 shoulder be re-constructed for a minimum of the driveway width plus twenty-five (25) feet on each side of the driveway. While it appeazs that the longitudinal limits have been addressed on the plans, it does not appear that the entire shoulder width has been called out for replacement. Please revise the plans accordingly. 4. Accommodations for bicyclists should also be included in the Work Zone Traffic Control plan. Please submit five (5) copies of revised plans. In your response letter, please state how the above comments aze addressed, item by item. Mr. Mazk Wolfgang is coordinating review of the subject material. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. ~ci~i~l~i~ned~By ~naik A. Saari SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Martin Sidor, Planning Boazd Chairperson, Town of Southold 1~ts. Kristy Winser, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:mm J t S A M U E L S& S T E E L M A N December 22, 2010 ' Ms. Kristy Winser Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 ; Southold, NY 11971 ~ ~ ' _ ~ ->~~l Re: Jemco Winery Dear Kristy, As per your letter dated November 9, 2010, we are re-submitting 2 sets of drawings of Site Plan documents for your review. Please advise it all revisions are acceptable and we will provide additional drawings for final approval. Below, please fine a summary of how the revised drawings and submittals address your comments. 1. As you are aware, the proposed development area is well over an acre in size and will require a SPEDES Permit and submission of a MS4 SWPP Acceptance Form to the Town of Southold for review. As such, your runoff coefficients provided will need to be revised to include oil and stone parking areas and other solid surfaces as a coe~cient of one, no[ 90%. In addition, all gravel driveway areas need to be included in the drainage calculations using arun-off coefficient of 60%. It is my understanding that your Engineer has discussed this matter with the Town Engineer and it was determined that any recommended practice may fie acceptable to meet this requirement e.g. French or h~ench drain, leaching pools or a drainage Swale. The same storm water system shall be required behind the storage tanks to recharge the excess storm water into the ground Said requirements are requested by the Planning Board to satisfy SPEDES &MS4 requirements and Chapter 236 on storm wafer management in the Southold Town Code. a. Enclosed is the SPEDES General Permit and two (2) Storm Water Pollution Plans (SWPPP). b. The revised Site Calculations have revised the runoff coefficients for both the oil/stone and gravel parking areas. Drywells have been added as required to the parking areas. A drainage Swale and a cross section detail has been shown on the Site Plan. c. Drywells have been added to the storage tanks for excess storm water. ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (5311 734-6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 2. It was noted that there does exist vegetation along the east property line. To help preserve and screen the winery use from the adjacent residential use, the Planning Board will require a 25' natural buffer. The addition of cedars from locations that may need to be removed from the development area may be transplanted to this area. Please provide a description on the site plan as noted above. a. The Site Plan indicates a 25' natural buffer along the east property line. 3. Although metal halide light futures are proposed, lighting seems to comply with the new code but to be sure, please submit a color rating so that staff can match it with the code requirement. Also as discussed, lighting for the proposed sign will need to be revised to be full cut-off from the sky face down-lights. a. A color rating for the metal halide fixtures has been added to the fixtures cuts on the Landscape Drawing. b. The sign lighting has been change to a down light as requested and is shown on the Landscape Drawing 4. Provide at minimum of one hydrant with a ISOOgpm be installed at a location near the proposed building approved by the Fire District. Also, provide a notation that "all roadways to the site remain free and clear access a. A hydrant and note has been shown on the Site Plan. 5. In regard to the DOT recommendation for a pedestrian path along the front (south) of the site and for cross access, the Planning Board will not require development of the path or access into the adjacent residential areas. However, the applicant shall comply with the remaining DOT comments and submit their approved permit prior to approval from the Planning Board. a. The DOT has been informed that the Planning Board will not require a pedestrian path along the front of the site or cross access. Drawings have been resubmitted to the DOT and we are now waiting for their final approval. This will be forwarded to the Planning Board once it is received. 6. To preserve the scenic quality of the New York State Scenic Byway, provide a notation on the plan stating that "no structures or signs within 75' of Rt. 25, except as shown on the approved site plan a. A note has been shown on the Site Plan with a 75' dimension line back from the front property line. 7. Beach access should be located to accommodate any future development and minimize the potential for erosion of the parcel. Show one area for future beach access and fence along the bluff as discussed. a. Future beach access and a fence has been shown on the Site Plan. 8. Provide potential fall zones for the wind turbine shown on the plan, and show the parking outside the fall zone area. a. A 130' radius (120' high wind turbine + 10') has been shown on the Site Plan. Please note that the overflow grass parking area has been reconfigured to be outside the fall zone. 9. The Board will require that an archeological survey Phase 1 to be conducted within the building and parking areas for any ground disturbance to preserve historic resources of the Town of Southold prior to a site plan being approved. a. The Phase I survey has been completed and a copy of the study is enclosed. A copy of the survey has also been sent to the NY State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation. We hope that the information provided with this resubmission meets with your approval and that we will be able to finalized the Site Plan Approval as soon as possible. If we can provide any additional information or answer any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincere y, Samu sand Ste~tman Architects r I ancy elman, R.A. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Bureau of Water Permits, 4th Floor - 625 Broadway, Albany. New York 12233-3505 Phone: (518) 402-8111 Fax: (518) 402-9029 Website: www deo_stale.ny.us I 1 _i!2010 Jf.MCO RLnI;IY LLC MICH,1L1_ KON"fOKOS"fA PO I30X G7 GRLF{V'POR"I A~Y 11914- ' - ~..~i~ Rc: ,~CKN0~1'LEDG~11?V'h of V'O'hICE of IV'I'EN'1' for Coy crags Under SPDI?S General Permit for Storm ~Vatcr Discharges from IX)NS'hRUC"I'10\ ~C'1'I~'I'I'Y General Permit No. GP-0-10-001 Ucm 1'rrnpccticc Pcnniltec: This is to acknowledge that the Ncw York State Dcpanc~nt of Environmental Conservation (Department) has rcccivcd a complete Notice of hltcnt (N(71) for covcragc under Gcncral Permit No. GP-0-10-001 for the consu action activities located aC JN:~iCO WINERY 825 Nl'S K"f 25 GREENPOR'I' NY 11944- County: SUFFOLK Pursuant to fnvironmcnlal Consewation Law Q;CL) nriiclc 17, Titles 7 and 8. ECI, Artidc 70. discharges in accordance .with GP-0-10-001 From the above construction sift will be authorized $ business days from 10/25/2010 which is the date we rcccivcd your final NOI, unless notified diflcrently b_v the Deparmlcnt. fhc permit identification number for this silt is: NYR lOT3IJ Bc sure to include this permit identification number on any forms or con~cspondencc you send us. ~~'ha~ covcragc under the Pcnnit is no longer needed. you must submit a Notice of'fennination to the Dcpartmcnt. 'this authoriratiun is conditioned upon the following: 1 . l~hc infbrmatirnl submitted in the NOI rcccivcd by the Dcpartmcnt on 10/25/2010 is accurate and comnlctc. 1'ou have developed a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (S\~PPP) that complies with GP-0-10- 001 which must be imple~nenlcd as the first clement of construction at die above-noted construction site. 3. nctivitics related to the about construction site comply with all other requirements of GP-0-10-001. • ~ 4. Vaymcnt of the annual 5100 regulatory fcc, which is billed separately by the Department in the late fa N. 7~hc regulator}' fcc covers a period of one calendar year. In addition, since September 1, 20114, consU-uction su~rmwatcr permittecs ha~~c been assessed an initial authorisation fcc which is no~c 5100 per acre of land disturbed and 5600 per acre of future impervious area. 'fhc initial auNrorizatimi fcc covers the duration of the authorised disturbance. i. When ppplicahle, project re~~ie~r pursuant to the Slate 1_nviromnen(al Qualily Review Act (SEQRA) has been suisifed. 6. 1'ou have obtained all necessai~~ Department pcn~iits subject (o the lJnili~im Procedures Acl (UPA). You should check with your Regional Permit Adminisll~ator Ibr further information. ~Notc: Construction activities cannot commence until project review pnrsuanl to SIQRA has been satisfied. ~nc~n S[QR~I is applicable: and. where required. all necessary Department pcnnits subjoct to the l~P;A have been obtained. Please he adeiscd that the llcpartmcnt may request a copy of your SW PPP for review. Should ~rou have any questions regarding any aspect of the requirc~nents specified in GP-0-10-0O1, please contact Dave Clasper at (518) 402-81 14 or the undersigned at (i13) 402-3109. Sinccrcly, -T.t3~+-- l~oni Ciol(i Environmental Program Specialist I cc: RWG- I SWPPP Prepares SAMUELS AND STP:ELMAN ARC}IITECTS S"IEfa.MAN NANCY \1:~1\ ROAD CU'IY'1IOGU13 NY 1 t93~- • . MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~OF $Q(~r P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR h~~ y0/_ Southold, NY 11971 Chair `O OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G ~ @ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ' l ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI ~~'Q~ ~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 76b-1835 Fax: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 9, 2010 Nancy Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Deaz Nancy, I'm writing as a follow up to the Planning Board Work Sessions held October 18, 2010 and November 1, 2010 whereas the above-referenced site plan was discussed and the following actions were taken. Please revise your site plans in accordance with the following comments and submit 7 copies for review: 1. As you aze aware, the proposed development azea is well over an acre in size and will require a SPEDES Permit and submissioai of a MS4 SWPP Acceptance Form to the Town of Southold for review. As such, your runoff wefficients provided will need to be revised to include oil and stone parking areas and other solid surfaces as a wefficient of one, not 90%. In addition, all gravel driveway areas need to be included in the drainage calculations using arun-off coefficient of 60%. It is my understanding that your Engineer has discussed this matter with the Town Engineer and it was determined that any recommended practice may be acceptable to meet this requirement e.g. French or trench drain, leaching pools or a drainage Swale. The same storm water system shall be required behind the storage tanks to rechazge the excess storm water into the ground. Said requirements are requested by the Planning Board to satisfy SPEDES &MS4 requirements and Chapter 236 on storm water management in the Southold Town Code 2. It was noted that there does exist vegetation along the east property line. To help preserve and screen the winery use from the adjacent residential use, the Planning Boazd will require a 25' natural buffer. The addition of cedars from locations that may need to be removed from the development area maybe transplanted to this area. Please provide a description on the site plan as noted above. Site Plan Review for 67 Stens Paae 2 November 5, 2010 3. Although metal halide light fixtures are proposed, lighting. seems to comply with the new code but to be sure, please submit a color rating so that staff can match it with the code requirement. Also as discussed, lighting for the proposed sign will need to be revised to be full cut-off from the sky face down-lights. 4. Provide at minimum of one hydrant with a ISOOgpm be installed at a location near the proposed building approved by the Fire District. Also, provide a notation that "all roadways to the site remain free and clear access". 5. In regard to the DOT recommendation for a pedestrian path along the front (south) of the site and for cross access, the Planning Board will not require development of the path or access into the adjacent residential areas. However, the applicant shall comply with the remaining DOT comments and submit their approved permit prior to approval from the Planning Board. 6. To preserve the scenic quality of the New York State Scenic Byway, provide a notation on the plan stating that "no structures or signs within 75' of Rt. 25, except as shown on the approved site plan". 7. Beach access should be located to accommodate any future development and minimize the potential for erosion of the parcel. Show one azea for future beach access and fence along the bluff as discussed. 8. Provide potential fall zones for the wind turbine shown on the plan, and show the pazking outside the fall zone area. 9. The Boazd will require that an archeological survey Phase 1 to be conducted within the building and pazking areas for any ground disturbance to preserve historic resources of the Town of Southold prior to a site plan being approved. Upon receipt of the above information, this matter will be scheduled for a Planning Board Work Session to review your submission. If you have any questions regazding the above comments, contact me anytime. Thank you. Sind" / ~ ' / Kristy Wieser Sr. Planner Cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Duector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, November 1, 2010 4:00 a.m. 4:00 p.m. Executive Session -Town Attorney to discuss pending lawsuits. 4:30 p.m. Applications: Pro ect name: Macari Vine ards - As Built SCTM#: 1000-121-1-1.3 1 - Location: 150 Bergen Avenue, at the intersection of Bergen Avenue and Sound Avenue, ._on the north side of Sound Avenue, in Mattituck_ _ _ j Description: This site plan is for additions 8 alterations to an existing winery on a 5.6 acre ~ parcel m the A C Zone located Status $ Approved Site Plan Action: Review the As Built Plan Attachments: ~ Staff Report - - - l Pro ect_name ~ 67 Steps Vineyard J( EMCO) __SCTM#_~ 1000-35-1 24 _ 1 ! Location: _ _ ~ 825 Main_Road, Green~ort________ _ _ _ ! Description. ,This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated j parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 ~ Zonin~strict.___ Status ~ Site Plan Review Action: Review Staff Report and Site Plan. f P Attachments ,Staff Re ort Protect name: Cutchogue/New Suffolk Historical SCTM#: 1000-109-5-6.1 Council Location: 27320 Main Road, on the s/w/c/o Main Road and Case's Lane, Cutchogue__ _ Description: This site plan is for the construction of a 660 sq. ft. storage building on a 1.38 acre parcel owned and operated by the Cutchogue/New Suffolk Historical Council. Status: I New Site Plan Action: !Review Staff Report. Staff recommends for the PB to formally accept the ! lication-for revew and b in referral rocess__ aPP-. _ ---p-- _Attachments (Staff Report Protect name FIDCO/Ferguson Museum/Harris I SCTM#: x1000 7-1-6 1 7 & 2 10 Location: no # rivate road off of East End Road, Fishers Island ! Description: t This proposed lot line change/re-subdivision will transfer a 15,145 sq. ft. portion ~ of FIDCO Lot 38-1 (SCTM#1000-7-1-6.1) to FIDCO Lot 38-2 (SCTM#1000-7-1- i ~ 7). FIDCO Lot 38-1 will decrease in size from 2.06 acres to 1.71 acres and i FIDCO Lot 38-2 will increase in size from 1.62 acres to 1.97 acres. Further, i FIDCO Lot 38-7 (SCTM#1000-7-2-10) will transfer 11,640 sq. ft. to FIDCO Lot ~ 38-2 (SCTM#1000-7). With this second transfer, FIDCO Lot 38-2 will increase in total size from 1.62 acres to 2.24 acres. FIDCO Lot 38-7 will decrease in size from 7.51 acres to 7.24 acres in the R-120 Zoning District. _ - --1 Status Open Action Accept application for review. - Attachments _ Staff Report__ _ _ _ _ _ _ Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Krisry Sent: Friday, October 22, 20101:35 PM To: Nancy Steelman (E-mail) Cc: Richter, Jamie; Terry, Mark; Bill Cremers (E-mail); Don Wilcenski; Joseph Townsend (E-mail); Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail); Pappy (E-mail) Subject: Jemco Status Nancy I believe our site visit with some of the Boazd members was very productive. Since all the Board members were unable to attend, I will schedule the application for the next work session Nov 1st, to discuss the findings of the site visit. The goal is to have a complete list of map changes for you to work from that will include the remaining issues being screening/buffers, wind turbine fall zones and easements. Also, as you're awaze, the Board did accept the Town Engineer's comments regarding drainage, therefore, if you would like to get started with those revisions regarding the runoff coefficients, you may do so. For your convenience, I have attached Mr. Richter's comments below. You may contact him directly for clarification and, as always, I'm available anytime with questions you may have. Thank you. jr its_2010102212004 Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Kristy.W inserCa).town.southold.nv.us 1 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, October 18, 2010 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda 4:15 p.m. Site Plans & Subdivisions Protect name ~ Macari Vineyards - As Built LSCTM#: [ 1000-121-1-1.3 ; r i Location. 1150 Bergen Avenue, at the intersection of Bergen Avenue and Soun i _ _ Avenue, on the_north side_of Sound Avenue, in Mattituck i Descnption: ;This site plan is for additions & alterations to an existing winery on a 5.6 ~ .-.-....._-.-.-_'_acre_parcel in the A-C Zone_-------- _ Status: {Approved Site Plan Action: Review the as builtplan.___ - Attachments: 1 Staff Report _ - - - - Proiect name 187 Steams Vineyard (JEMCO) T SCTM#: _1000-35-1-24 - - - - - , Location 825 Main Road, Green~ort _ _ Description. This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning_District. _ _ _ Status: Site Plan Review Action: Review Staff Report and Site Plan_ Attachments ;Staff Report Pro~ect_name Guadagno, Patrick_ )SCTM#:11000-27 1 2 Location. ion the north side of Orchard Street, approximately 1,008' west of Platt _ _ _ i_R_oa_d, i_n_O__rient _ _ ______I F... _ _ .i. - Description: I This proposal is for a standard subdivision to subdivide a 10-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 is 1.5 acres and Lot 2 is 8.5 acres, inclusive of ~ a 2 5 acre buildin envelo a and 6_acres of subdivision open-space. i -g---._P _ Status: ~ Conditional Sketch Approval _ . Action: ,Review requests made bry~licant via a mail. Attachments: ; E-mail Request _ _ _ ______j Protect name _ i .Battaglia, Joseph & Heidi SCTM#:I 1000-64-3-3 Location. ion the west side of Hobart Road, approximately 1,059 feet north from I }Terry Lane, Southold _ _ _ Description: ,This is a standard subdivision to subdivide 101,002 sq. ft. into two lots ;where Lot One is 43,213 sq. ft. and Lot Two is 57,809 sq. ft. in the R-40 Zoning_District. Status: Conditional Preliminary -EXPIRED ,Action: {Review site wsit and letter from neighbor's representative. Attachments ;Letter from Twomey, Latham, Shea i _ _ _ - CHIEF JOHN D. GRILLI ~ I I~ (631) 477-9801 -STATION 1 1sT ASST. CHIEF KENNETH WHITE, JR. (631) 477-6261 -STATION 2 2ND ASST. CHIEF WAYDE MANWARING (631) 477-1943 -CHIEFS OFFICE CHAPLAIN C. KUMJIAN (631) 477-4012 -FAX TREAS/SECRETARY J. KALIN THIRD STREET~RO. BOX 58 RECORDING SECRETARY C. HUGHES GREENPORT, NY 11944 t , r - Email: gfdfire~optonline.net Organized 1545 f October 14, 2010 Kristy Wineer Senior Planner ~ Town Of Southold Po box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear I{risty, As per our conversation on October 14, 2010 I have recommendations on the JEMCO Winery SCTM#1000-35-24 1- We would like to see a one minimum hydrant with a 1500gpm, at least at the northern end of the main drive on the east side of the driveway- 2- No street lights or cobble stone neaz or on the turn about circle (this will be needed for out tower ladder to be able to make the tight turn) We also would like to have the opportunity to have several "walk through" as needed. This will help with our preplanning for proper assignment of our appazatus. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me 631-831-0985 (cell) emati~ca~ll~y~,~ -iircl/u/ John Grilli Chief Engineer Greenport Fire dept. ~ ~ \ ~~yy~~r ~ l~' OFFICE LOCATION: QF $ MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex O~ P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 ~~,yy~~~ Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) ~ T Southold, NY 11971 u> ~ ~ Telephone: 631 765-1935 ~ ~p~A, Fas:631765-3136 ~1y00UNTy LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Martin Sidor, Chair Town of Southold Planning Board From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: October 14, 2010 ` 1 J,1~ Re: Proposed Site Plan for Jemco Winery ~ V J SCTM# 1000-35-1-24 Zoning District - R-80 This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 s.f. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP, provided that the below recommendations are required in the site plan approval. The area is included and identified as an archeo-sensitive site. Therefore, it is unknown if the proposed action will impair important historical or archaeological resources at this time. To further the intent of Policv 2, Preserve historic resources of the Town of Southold it is recommended that an archeological survey be conducted within the buildina and ~arkino areas prior to any ground disturbance. To further Policy 3, Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. A. Minimize introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character,' and E. Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality: 1. Preserve existing vegetation which contributes to the scenic quality of the landscape. Require a 75' scenic easement from the State Route 25 property line north to preserve to the scenic quality of the New York State Scenic B~ay To further Policy 4.1, Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards" the following is recommended. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. Reouire one beach access over the bluff to minimize the potential for erosion. The access should be located to accommodate anv future development of the ap rcel• To further Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem the following is recommended. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. E. Maintain buffers to ensure that adverse effects of adjacent or nearby development are avoided: 1. Maintain buffers to achieve a high filtration efficiency of surface runoff. 2. Avoid permanent or unnecessary disturbance within buffer areas. 3. Maintain existing indigenous vegetation within buffer areas. Require the establishment of a natural vegetated buffer from the too-of-bluff line landward for distance of 100'. A sample definition follows: NATURAL VEGETATED BUFFER --Aland area of a certain length and width where existing vegetation occurs prior to the commencement of any grading or clearing activity. Vegetation shall be maintained to achieve a minimum percentage of ground cover of 95%. To achieve the percentage of ground cover, indigenous, drought-tolerant vegetation shall be planted. Survival of planted vegetation shall be 90% for a period of three years. Maintenance activities within the buffer are limited to removing vegetation which is hazardous to life and property, trimming tree limbs up to a height of 15 feet to maintain viewsheds, replanting of vegetation and establishing afour-foot-wide access path constructed of pervious material for access to the water-body. [Added 12-15-2009 by L.L. No. 15-2009] Policy 12.1, "Protect agricultural lands from conversion to other land uses." D. Provide buffers between agricultural and non-agricultural uses. New development located adjacent or in proximity to agricultural land or uses should provide sufficient buffer between agricultural and non-agricultural lands to protect agricultural uses from interference from non-agricultural uses, and protect non-agricultural lands from potentially offensive agricultural practices. Further, if the action is approved it is recommended that a vegetative buffer be established between the western (main) parkino area and residential properties to the west and between the eastern overflow parking areas and residences to the east to minimize potential conflicts between the residences and the future agricultural/winery use. The location of the buffers should be further discussed (e.g. On the property line or against the parking areas) If the above recommendations are accepted as wnditions it is recommended that the Board require that the conditions be memorialized in a filed covenant and restriction. Cc: Tamara Sadoo, Planner 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue NY 11935 (631) 734 6405 Fax (631) 734 6407 To: Kristy Winse From: Nancy Steelman Southold Town Planning Dept. Address:54375 Main Road Date: October 5, 2010 Southold, NY 11971 CC: Re: Jemco Winery ? Urgent x For Review ? Please Comment ? Please Reply Decription: 1. Trip Generation Calculations 2. Approved Suffolk County Health Department Stamped Drawings 3. Foot candle study of exterior lighting Please call if you have any questions. Thank you C" - Nancy Steelman I Trip generation estimates for the Jemco Winery are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip General Manual, 8`h Edition. The ITE Manual is the industry standard for trip generation analysis and provides trip generation rates based on use classifications of a building. The following use classifications and associated net square footage of building area were used to calculate the estimated PM peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposed project: Land Use Code Description Building Area (NetSq.Ft.) Trips/HOUrperl,000Sq.Ft. 140 Manufacturing 1,670 0.73 150 Warehousing 860 0.32 710 General Office 1,537 1.49 814 Specialty Retail 3,011 2.71 Based on the above chart, the total PM Peak Hour vehicle trips is equal to 11.94. Rounding up, this equals 12 vehicle trips per peak hour. Note that this figure represents the upper bound estimate as it does not include the ITE recommended reduction for "passby" trips for land uses in the 800 code group. Accounting for the adjustment reduces the estimated peak hour vehicle trips to 7. - OCT - 6 2010 I • ~ ~ P~ STATE OF NEW YORK ~l DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 25O VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAU PPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-551 8 SU BIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. STANLEY GEE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTING COMMISSIONER September 28, 2010 Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels & Steelman Architects ~ - 1 2010 , 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Your July 14, 2010 Submission Proposed Jemco Winerv NY 25, Greennort SCTM No. 1000-03500-0100-024000 Our Case No. 10-17669P Deaz Ms. Steelman: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. In recent yeazs, many states have employed access management as a major technique to address conflicts between through traffic and that generated by developments. The goals of access management aze to limit the number of access points, sepazate conflict points and remove turning traffic from through movements. New York State is utilizing this technique to minimize impacts to State highways. We recommend, therefore, that cross access to this site be obtained from adjacent property. If this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. 2. We will require the entire width of the NY 25 shoulder be re-constructed for a minimum of the driveway width plus twenty-five (25) feet on each side of the driveway. The limits for shoulder re-construction shall be shown on the plans and it shall include full depth asphalt construction. Tack coat shall be included between every asphalt lift and at the joints between new and existing asphalt pavement edges. Please include the appropriate detail and NYSDOT specification item number. The asphalt item numbers and depths shall conform to current superpave specification item numbers as follows: Top Course - 2", Item 402.098301 & Item 402.098311 Binder Course - 2-1/2", Item 402.198901 & Item 402.198911 Ms. Nancy Steelman • • September 24, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Base Course - 5-1/2", Item 402.378901 & Item 402.378911 Sub Base Course - 6", Item 17304.101199 3. The minimum width for asphalt pavement repair is four (4) feet plus an additional one (1) foot overcut. 4. We recommend that this site connect to the existing sidewalk east of the proposed site by building a pedestrian path instead of sidewalk to maintain the rural chazacter of the area. Pedestrian paths are generally set back at least 5 ft. from the road and do not require curb. The path can be separated from the road using turf and should also create a connection with the commercial site to the west. 5. Please provide standard details for sidewalk, driveways, and curb ramps. Reference NYS Standard Sheets 608 series for details and notes. Limits for these items shall be shown and called out on the plans. 6. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the NY 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. 7. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." 8. A driveway profile or on site elevations, including elevations at the State highway right-of- way line, shall be shown on the plans to ensure that all drainage is contained on site since we do not permit runoff from private property onto the State highways. 9. Please show and call out the nearest NY 25 mile marker on the plan. 10. We recommend that permanent survey markers be installed at the property limits along the State highway frontage. Please call out these locations on the plans and include the appropriate detail. 11. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of--way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Work Zone Traffic Control plan -all referenced to NYSDOT specification item ntunbers and the National Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices with NYS Supplement) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. The applicant may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regarding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP) applications. The applicant should be made aware that utility HWP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. Please submit five (5) copies of revised plans. In your response letter, please state how the above comments are addressed, item by item. Mr. Mazk Wolfgang is coordinating review of the subject material. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regazding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his Ms. Nancy Steelman • • September 24, 2010 Page 3 of 4 attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly your , OrQinal Signed ~y Shalk A. Saari SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Martin Sidor, Planning Boazd Chairperson, Town of Southold /Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:mm MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS QE SOUP P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~4~~ yOIO Southold, NY 11971 Chair ~ ~ OFFICE LOCATION: WILLL4M J. CREMERS ~ ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS :::ttt~~' ~ p~ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND O 'M a (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI l~COUn l , ~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1958 Faz: 831 765-5138 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 14, 2010 Ms. Nancy Steelman clo Samuels & Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Close Hearing: Proposed Site Plan for JEMCO Winery Located at 825 NYS Route 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25, Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Ms. Steelman: A public hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 13, 2010 regarding the above-referenced Site Plan. The public hearing was closed. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman v • • MAII,ING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~OF $~(~Ty P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~O~ Q~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair ~ y OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ 0 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND Q ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI l'`(,0~ ~ Southold, NY Telephone: S31 766-1835 Fea: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 14, 2010 Ms. Nancy Steelman c% Samuels & Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Negative Declaration: Proposed Site Plan for JEMCO Winery Located at 825 NYS Route 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25, Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Ms. Steelman: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, September 13, 2010: WHEREAS, this site plan is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, makes a determination ofnon-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. JEMCO Winery Page Two Seatember 14, 2010 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman cc: Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Planning Commission Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Engineer Southold Town ARC New York State Department of Transportation ~~I i • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS - `~pF SOUjy P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~0~ 0~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair y OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G ~ ~ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND '~'0 ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI l''(,,O'nM ~ Southold, NY 1!111 l Telephone: 831 78b-1838 Fas: 831 786-3138 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant September 13, 2010 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 7 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for Jemco Winery SCTM#: SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Zone: R-80 Location: 825 NYS Rt. 25, Greenport SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 s.f. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed. The determination was based upon the following: Impact On Land The proposed action proposes the grading or stripping which affects more than 5,000 square feet of ground surface and therefore the application requires a Town of SEAR Neoative Declaration - Paae Two Southold Drainage Control Permit pursuant to §236-10. Activities requiring drainage control permit. Soils on site consist of Riverhead sandy loam (RdA) and Plymouth Loamy Sand (PIS). Riverhead sandy loam is representative of outwash plains; the hazard of erosion is slight. Plymouth sandy loam normally occurs on moraines and outwash plains; the hazard for erosion is also slight. Aerial analysis indicates that the footprint of the meeting/conference building is located on Plymouth sandy loam soils. Potential impacts to the soil stability have been mitigated with The Site Grading Drainage & Layout Plan and (SP-2) Plan. Soil borings indicate that groundwater levels are greater than 23 feet. The depth to groundwater is sufficient to meet the 3' separation distance required for sanitary systems per Suffolk County Department of Health standards. No substantial impact to groundwater is expected to occur if the project is implemented as planned. Impact of Water 2.1. Water Supply The site will be served by public water. 2.2. Sanitary Disposal Sanitary disposal will be managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8) hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according to Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre in areas served by public water. The sanitary design flow is computed using SCDHS manual Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences. The manual establishes the design flow as follows: Total acreage of 39.78 x 600s~ad = 23.868 sand allowable flow Total proaosed flow = 722.7 aad. i Therefore, the proposed application would conform with Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and would not be expected to adversely affect groundwater quality provided properly functioning systems are designed and installed. SEAR Negative Declaration -Page Three 2.3. Ground or Surface Water Quality or Quantity In the existing storm water drainage patterns will be impacted resulting from the construction of the winery. In review of The Site Grading Drainage & Layout Plan (SP-2) Plan the best management practices to deal with storm water are adequate and therefore, potential impacts from storm water runoff are expected to be low. The proposed action is located south of the Long Island Sound and 701.4' + from the regulated bluff feature. The Town of Southold Board of Trustees in a June 1, 2010 memorandum has determined that the location of the winery is located outside of the Board's jurisdiction. Correspondingly, on August 13, 2010 the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation also issued a "Letter of No Jurisdiction Tidal Wetlands AcY'. 2.4. Flooding The proposed improvements is located within FEMA Flood Zone X; areas identified as areas of moderate or minimal hazard from the principal source of flood in the area, therefore the potential impacts from threat of flooding is low. Impact on Air No substantial adverse change in existing air quality is expected to occur. Impact on Plants and Animals The parcel is not located within a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Critical Environmental Area or a New York State Department of State Significant Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area. The majority of the site is in agricultural production (grapes). The building is proposed to be located on vacant land. The New York State Environmental Research Mapper (2009) was referenced to determine if records of rare or threatened plants or animals have been identified as occurring on site. No rare or threatened plants or animals have been recorded on-site or within the vicinity of the site. ~I No significant removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation will occur. Correspondingly, no substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species nor impacts on a significant habitat area are expected to occur. i i SEAR Negative Declaration -Pape Four Impact on Agricultural Land Resources The parcel is currently used for agriculture and, therefore, no adverse impacts (loss of agricultural lands) will occur. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The parcel is located adjacent to a designated New York State Scenic Byway (S.R. 25) an important view shed as identified by the community. However, the winery structure will be located 2,335.53 feet from the roadway and will not obstruct the view shed. No substantial adverse impacts to aesthetic resources are expected to occur. Impact on Historical and Archeological Resources The New York Department of State GIS- Public Access map was referenced for occurrence of archeo-sensitive areas on site. The area is included and ident~ed as an archeo-sensitive site. In an August 16, 2010 letter, the New York State Department of Parks and Recreation and Historic Preservation recommends that a Phase I archeological audit be accomplished. Therefore, it is unknown if the proposed action will impair important historical or archaeological resources at this time. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action is located greater than 700 feet from public lands or waters (Long Island Sound). No impacts to public open space or recreational areas will occur as a result of this action. Impact on Critical Areas The proposed action is not located within a New York Department of Environmental Conservation Critical Environmental Area. I Impact on Transportation I Potential impacts to traffic (generation and flow) resulting from the proposed use is expected to be low. Impact of Energy No major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy is expected to occur. Noise and Odor Impact No substantial change in noise or odor is expected to occur. i SEAR Negative Declaration -Page Five Impact on Public Health No creation of a hazard to human health is expected to occur. No substantial increase in solid waste production, leaching or drainage problems expected to occur if the proposed action is implemented as planned. Impact on Growth Character of Community or Neighborhood The proposed action is not in a significant material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. Based upon such, no significant adverse impacts to the environment are expected to occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number. (631) 765-1938 cc: Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Planning Commission Southold Tpwn Board of Trustees Suffolk County Water Authority ~ Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Engineer Southold Town ARC New York State Department of Transportation I I i r ~ ~i ~ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as ~SaS ~ i ~ aS ~-a,~~~~~i ~Y ~sc~ ~ ion - ~s - I - a ~ by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has re na'ned in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on G 3 l I have sent notices, by certified mail -return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on ,tr ti tJ~1O`(, ~S~ Your ame (print) Sig ature Address (I ~ Date_ , ry Pu E ILY NEALY Notary Public, State Of w York No.0~HE6059270 Qualified In Suffolk County ~ Commission Expires July 23, 20~~ ~F ~ PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 9/10/10 Re: Proposed Site Plan for JEMCO Winery SCTM#s: 1000-35-1-24 Date of Public Hearing: Monday. September 13, 2010, 6:05 p.m. ~ ~ m m ~ ~ R1 ~s S fU ..B Postega $ $D.44 ~i, m Girl ( ~~n ~E ° ~ CertiHetl Fee .a~ aU 9q4, ,~B sA ° Postage $ r~.'ii U~^'~'- ~ Retum Receipt Fee ^ F Pos9nerk ° (ErMOrsement Requlretl) ~q~•,T, ~9 Here ~ CediHetl Fea $~•5(; V4 1J ~c~,~; ° Resmpetl Delivery Fee 1U~ fll mPaslaf§rk.. (Endorsemem Raquiretl) $p,QQ V ° Retum Receipt Fee y ~ Hera ° ° (Endorsement Required) t ° Restricted Delivery Fee ~ Total Postage&Fees $ $5. j4 `OFIOiI2610 (Endorsement Requires) °f fli ~ ~'I ~ ° / ~ ant ° Cynthia Harmon Total POe[ageBFeea $ as r4 IJ%/~;`~UIU ° s~rearaPr~:;y~-VtresiEric!-Ave. 0 or PO Bar MO. ~ `1/ictor A. Brown _ _ - c~iis~re:Yia;~dew'-1`ork;•f~f'Y'-16023"---------••-•--•------------ ° o.POa~O. OU~Id•~~y~- ant o o sr~r,-Jack$_Edwina_Skreze~ ° p,POB~~Sound Rd. v M1 ~ TMalPOSt~geBFees ~5.~~ (h/~i12Q1~ °r"~nport, NY 11944 ~ Bonn ~ • ~ ~ ~ ° Deborah Hooper ^ nt ° o Siiee{~a~°Box i85_...... and-Eilaea-Y•erih~•--..-._._._-.._..--- ° cdrPO--~ea"•.~>TPort,'td•Y--11944•--•--._._._.._.._..___. ° Siieei, ApC70o., •7 M1 City Sieie, 21'Y.fe__ ant o P~reenport, NY 11944 ~ - - po n era Cost Ito ~ - o ~3tieetMr~~4-8ux2'12~k o^ ~e hen & France Dorri a ° orPO o -P1~--...__ si1~9?aPor}r•PH~ •4=I••944._..__._...._.___-_...__._._ r. , . om: , 0 or~'9aFt'n6: 3$°f S`t:•7~pt': 1•i17°... _ M1 ~Ndfk;-itl1"'16618--..-._.___.____._..__________________ o ~ Toter®Fpge `.5a ~09lOy/2010 7 rGl llctt~ ~ t ° ~ nt F> tact.Hpllander_______________________..___.._..r.._.-._- ° a„~~;:,deF?•iA~a~r--__-_...___...___.._.__.._.___-.-._.._.. ° or PO Bar ° ~fBe`'~~07 6"' Ave. 4R ° °'.PO~t~unack._111Y_.11Z rv Cif; ~M~ M1 City, Smfe, ZI '~Pboklyn, NY 11215 a ~ en a ~ arshall & Heidi Vayer Lisa G..Gfds~t.__.._...---• o sr,~r~r~yreeneSt:---•--••---•--•--.-.-•-•- - o nee. o wPo anove_r Sq:•Apt: 2M-_---•----_._......___._.___. r irtY•1-4238• ~'"~N~+itfl'ork, NY-10005 , nt ° us m ° ecornc an )ng at outhold ° Sireei; - ' • ' ' ° Siieei:wro~+~+-BreCkTiOtik•t~d:• ° °_POeq~~QlADSI_RSL.--•-•--• ° °,PO #~-4-}944--••---...---••--.___.__....--•- t` cm: ztP«a rv ags'sra , P~~ ~reenport, NY 11944 a ~ ant o ant o i Ve r, anag(o anouvelos li~.e_5...~1~(ebb ° 'sneer, ° ~r~:c-9'~rescent-st;------- - - ° nrPO Sound R_d. _ o p.PO ,qty.__~t__}1-}gp•-•-•--._....... - ary B M1 D,ty- i _ ant Ta sent a pyyn O QU O B- enoifer--1AlA-Sinalai-~ - Box•1.4~•J• ° sn°°t,A°` Sound Rd. ° -srieei%l: ' ° °,POea=-------------------------- - ° a~PO 111a1--a•157.1_~.__._.._._..__._. 'c'y:sie , s`afe~~~enport, NY 11944 - ~ - _ m m - 0 Poamge S nG.44 G~G,. ra Ca^Itletl Fee 179q~ 52.54 G4 ~ Retum Receipt Fea ~ `$FN Poaenerk Q (Eneoraement Requiree) sG.-.''rJ ..A Here D Reamcteo Delivery Fee (Enaorsemant gequiretl) SG. GG ° ~ Total Postage 8 Fees $ 5.`i.5'i s~~tG4i.JIG r i enf o Thomas & L~4t[l~.~ ° ~ Wit'.7~...------•------- - - ~n-----••----...._. ° o. POeoxhb.t Caton St. ~ N ¦ ¦ , crci:3ai:;i~asf NOi~h---rt.......___..__._-......_.._.......... o h s ~ Q~ o n g s~ 8 Po , NY 11731 - ® ~ ~ ~ ~ Aa N ;0 W ~c ~ m~E ~ ra Total Poateye 8 ~ ` ~ G^. =f 1[i11G ~ ~ 3 ~ m ~ n ~ nn 9 to or an ray ~ ~ z~~~ s ~~~m~N ° A~r~-83.85-tt@°i~t:-7tpt°8J.-_.-•---------.... ~ m ° arPoBOVr Ha - F tWq ° ~ ~ O ~ G G erornca oeb ° m ~ m $ 8 ° w ~ ~ m am:~? '#Y•~1.944-•-----_._...._...-__._-...... ~ M1 r . O S f aro a av( N ~ ~ S ~ N ~ m ° 3'eeeL %~d`1~'t~eL'iCer~~~• o ~ 3 ~ r~i z~ M1 ~ t O ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ,Z~. g 2 3 S flJ ro ~ ~ ~ V~ t reen o ea ~ ~ a ~ . ..w.-. -~a~~a--.._ ` 0 3 ~ ~ ° wPOMr Cliy ~lMi. ~ I I - ~ F ~ o ~ ~ sa eee m p 3 ? ? r-R to I ~ m {/J ~ c~ I N 0 3tiieer,;lyt _ o o<POeox .Alassau-Si.~t_.1QG...-------• , ~ ~ ew York NY 10038 o Reslrlcted,)elWe+y Fee (ErMOreement Requires) SO.GO GS ~ To[al Postage 8 Feea $ 55.54 V?%G41~I0 a^f a (c a an ennifer Ber v o,PO rb. o -stir,S?•2lfl'aS't - ,sx#er-Nl~••X1364• ' r" Cify, Sfe4s, S o -sr;~aa'f~7-A4-38a'-fcve:_ lr Evel _n F_ Va----~ -y - ° County Rd. 48 ° o. POemr ~1-Y-1.3354.........-•---------_..._____.. ° o,POe~ 1 11 N ~ ¦ ¦ ¦ Y~ OD ~ 3 SI ¦ Complete kerns 7.2, and 3. Also complete ~ ~ ~ @ kern 4 H ReeMcted Delivery b desired. S ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse X O / ~ m 3 ~ ~ 1, so mat we can return the card to you. B. p slued c. Date c o. ~~p nj m ¦ Attach mts card to the beds of me mailpiece, ~ „ ~ - S $ y rA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t° or on me front H apace permts. t2 ? ~ ,p p ~ ~ o w ~ 1. Artlcle Addressed to: D kYE3, livery mss ~ ~ I ° ~ 3 o m g • ~ y.c `~9 Thomas ~ Laurie Culligan ~s~ 6ti~v g ~ g ~ m 11 Caton St. S ~ ~ F East N NY 1'1731 ~ ° 3. SBIVICB Iype ~ c ° ~ _ _ . 39 ° n to Q1111 c m K ? a • ~ I1 N ¦ Complete kerns 1, 2, and 3. Also complete - o g $ ~ ~J ~ ~g kern 4 k Restricted Delivery ~ de X ~ $ ~ s ¦ Print your name and address on me reverse ''A,,~ „ ~ so mac we can return me card to you. ~,(~q~(I~ry~° ~C' w ¦ Attach mis card to me bads of me mailpfeoe, ~r~ [~f{J 1 d~ ty or on me fioM k space permits. D. Ia dalNerY address dMerermlram psr, 14 ~ O ~ o ~ ~ $ l~ti 1. Article Addressed to: k YES, abler delivery address 6MVS~~ ~ .00 ~ ~ ~ 2 . 4 _ y t30X 18'5 9. service Type htil ~ ~ ~ O $ V3 n ad Mall ExPrega t)<CartHl ~ Green NY 11944 ~ _ ~ ~r D Registered d rRehan Mme. ~ ~ ~ of m . ~ _ - ¦ Complete kerns 1, 2, and 3. Also complete a ig lure 4.1 i ~ ~ ~ s E °c ~ ~ kern 4 k ResMc[ed Delivery Is desired. X ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 6 m ~ ~ s ¦ Pdnt your name and address on me reverse ~ ~ ~ so that we can return the card to you. e. ' ~ Name) D, m j ~ v ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ m 2 w ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, o• ' m v o ~ ~ or on the front'd space pertnks. 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ° ro D. b delivery address dkrerent from item 11 ~ ~ ~ m ~ mo. 1. Article Addressed to: k YES, ender delivery address bebvr. ~ ~I ' at a~ n f7PP ~ ~ ~~g~ e - • • • • . . o I' ¦ Complete kerns 1, 2, and 3, Also cornplece A re -m I g kern 4 k Restricted Delivery k deeked. ! ¦ Print your name and address on me reverse ~~c - & so that we ten return the card to you. & ~ o ~ ¦ Attach mis card tome beck of me mellplece, y or on me trork k space pennka. ° - D. dsg'aarY addreao dMaamflan ken l?O 3 0 e fo o X ? ~ : 1. Article Addressed to: ° YES, Brener delivery address DBIOW: O ~ N ~ ~ S Jennffer W. Sinddr ~ ~ ~ ° 20 Sound Rd. w $ Greenport, NY 11944 ~ ~ w 3. ~ Certlme~d Meq O.6~reee Mall DN-' ~ ~ O ? Reghcatad. O fieaan Receipt for Mel t''' O Irreured Mall ? C.O.D. S 'gyp 3 ~ \ ~ 4. Reatrb[ed Deweri/1 (Extra Fee) l7 ~ 76 ~ ~ ~ C r, z. ArgcleNumber 7009 1410 0002 1063 318 ~ SK:- rn ~ (~~nslerlrom aemceretx~ ` ' PS Fortn 3811, Fetxuary 2004 Domeadc Return Receipt toxsss ~ ~ g ! N/ ~ ~ r g '3 - c is 3 ~ _ ~ ~ 1 NI y ¦q ¦ ¦ ~ ' • • O VIN` Tj ODo ¦ yCo~mpkydep~tte~m~sy1,~2~.yen\d....3.,.Alsocomplete A Smnmue ~ m ~ U s ~ 1y1~j•'» ' 1W11.41111WYlYIPd ~••p'~. j ~ ~ ~ ~I ¦ Prkrt your name and address tm the reverse A ( m so that we can return the card to you. ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ • ¦ Attach this card to the bade o} the meilpiece, ' S or on ttre from k apace permka ~ g D. la deavayaddlem dltfar¦dnan Item 11 @2 Z a ~ $ a ~ ~ 1. ArtIUe Addressed to: kYES, eater delMery atldress below: N ~ ~ ~ m m »~~m ~s~~~~ ~ Veronica Loeb ° ~ ~ ~ ~ a = $ g 1050 County Rd. 48 r ~ 3 o m- Greenport, NY f 1944 ~ a servlcelype 8 r, a ~ ca¦rmed Mml o new ~ ~ v m ~ ~ n O e • • I, • • • g O H O ¦ Complete kerns 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A Sign re a ~ ? w c ~ x ~ kern 4 k Restricted Delivery is desired. X ~ o x ? p ~ . a ¦ ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse 1 so that we can return the card to you. g. ~ f prt~ C. ~ W $ ~ v' ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, q g or on the from k space pennks, d 7 Iw ~ ~ ; 1. Article Addressed to: D address from trerri 1? ~ ~ $ 5, enter delivery tlresa below: ~ ~4z DOp Joseph and ENeen verity ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 32 Sound Rd. ~ ° ~ ~ • Greenport, NY 11944 a, service Type ~ ~ ~ ~ • • e • . x ~ • ~ - i ¦ Complete keme 1.2, end & Also complete A. y _ ¦ ¦ ¦ Itertr 4 ff ResMCted DelFrery N desired. X S~r;'j (7 „ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o D ~O s ¦ Prim r name end address on the reverse \~x" ~ o o 3 so that~ive can return the card to you. B, Recewed by f p, y,~f c. ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ g ~ ~ ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, q o. e ~ c ' or on thefront k space permks. s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a, ~ D. la address tlsfererrt ~ ~ 083~~iu 1. Article Adtlressetl to: deNsiY frem Mani 1? m . RYES, enter delNery erldreae liekiw: ? N v _ i m d I. o m ' e e ~ 0 tp ~~~~~w ¦ Complete kerns 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A nature .n JS+• ~ ~ ~ S item 4 k Restricted Delivery is desired. M~~ ~ e ~ t' ~ g ¦ Prnt your name and address on the reverse X ~~~JJJ~~' wrK~ `^~'r p ~ ~ 33 ~ m x so that we can return the card to you. Retelved by f ~ C. Dat o 9 AA ~ ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ~ a3 or on the froM'd space pennks. o 1. Article Addressed to: . Is delWery edtlresss d'iMe nt from item 17 ? Yr x ~ k YES, order delivery atltlreas below: ? N ~ rLl Peconic Landing at Southold ~ ° o o ~ _ : x 1500 Brecknock Rd. ~ w Greenport, NY 11944 ~,,,,~T,,p~ o ~ ~ g Certkled Mall O Express Mall W Registered ? Reium Receipt for Mer ? Insured Meil ? C.O.D. ~ ? Q ? ~ • 4. ReaMcted Delivery! (Extra Fee) ? y O 2. Article Number ~ v ~ al • (lrensfer from semce labeq 7~~9 1410 0002 163 3289 ~ ~ PS Form February 2004 Domesdc Return Receipt tep~,r ~ ~ 'o _ ~ QD ~ O ~ ~ ~ m r _ . I~ ¦ Complete~tema 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A Slg ~ J Item 4 H Restricted Delivery la desired. , ? Agent ~ Print your name and address on the reverse X ? Atlaressee so that we can return the card to you. g, gecelvetl py f rrted ) C. Date of DelNery ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mallplece, A~~e or on tttsdYoM N space permits. (,Yt ' I O D. Is delivery address difeent from Item 17 ? Yes 1. Artic rased to: If YES, enter dellvery address below: ? No ~.-Cradlt ~ _ ~ ` er Sq. Apt. 2M NY 10005 a. servi~e,ype ~ Cerdfietl Mall ? Mail Regleteretl ? Retum Receipt fa Merchandise ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restrkted DelNert/! (Extra Fee) ? Nse z. ArtkdeNWnber 9 141j~,.p002 1063....3210 ortn a ru tazuas-oaransao ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also plate A Signature. item 4 M Restricted Delivery Is desired. r ? Agent ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse X ? Addressee so that we Can return the Card to you. g, R ved by ~Prlnted Name) C. to livery ¦ Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, q i or on the front fF space permits. G D. Is delNery address different from item 1? ? es 1. Article Addessed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No Cynthia Harmon ~ 170 West End Ave. New York, NY 10023 a ~ Certlfied Mall ? Egress Mail ? Registered ? Return Receipt for Merchentlise ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restricted DelNery7 /Extra Fee) ? Yes 2. Article Number (rransfartrormserv;cefabe 7009 1410 0002 1064 3363 PS Form 3811, February~00~-V Domestic Return Receipt to2sss-sz-n'l-tsao ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also a plate A Ig to Item 4 K Restricted Delivery is deal V _ ? Ages ¦ PrIM your name and address on the reverse ~~L. ? Addressee so that we can return the card to you, by f py ) Delivery ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, 0 i e or on the front M space permits. / 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delNery address dfiferent from 1? ? es If YES, enter delNery address low: ? No ~y. rA Carole Mavity 1 350 Bleecker St. Apt. 5P New York, NY 10014 a. Service type ~ Certified Mail ? r~reea Mail ? Registered ? ReWm Receipt for Mercfiendlae ? Irtaured Mall ? C.O.D. 4. ResMCted Delivery! (Exha Feel 2. Article Number ~ ' (rnvrslerfromservice;eoeq 7005 `1410 0002 1064 3370 PS Forth 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt tozsxt-oz-rd-tsao ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3, Also A item 41f Restdc[ed Delivery is desired. ~ erd ¦ PrIM your name and address on the reveres ressee so that we can return the card fo you. 6. ~ Deiiwsy ¦ Attach this card to the heck of the mailpiece, ~ i / -/0,~~ or on the front iF space pertnlta. ~ c~ D. bd~ry address dMreren[irom Item t? ?Yes 1. Article Addressed to: N YES, entx delNwy edtlress below: ? No Eve~i F. VanTuyl ~~'"'r-v 680~ounty Rd. 48 Greenport, NY 11,944 a service rypa i~ cemnea Mall o ogee Mau i7 Registered O Retum Receiptior MercherMlae L7 Irreured Mall Q C.O.D. 4. RBSidcled DeINery7 (Odra Fee) ? y~ 2. ArgcleNumtier 7009 141 002 1064 3356 (narwrar /rorn seMCe label, PS Form 3811, February 2004 c Retum Receipt toxsss-n -tsoa ~ ¦ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also comp A SlBnature Nem 4 fl Reahictsd Delvery la desired. ~ O ¦ PrIM your name and address on the reverse X ? Addressee so that we can return the card t0 you. B. Reoelved by ( ed Name) ~ O. Date of DBIWery ¦ Attach-this card to the bads of the maflpiece, or on the front ff space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. la deNvay addrem dlRaent fiarr Nam 14 ? Yes Ir YES, enter deuvery address below: ? No Mitchell and Jennifer Berg ~~~^CQ) 333 E. 30'" St. New York, NY 10016 a ~ ~i Certllled Mell ~ Egseae Meal D Re~etered O Realm Recefpt for Merchandise ? Insured Mell ? C.O.D, a. Resmcted Delhreryt (ryma Feel O vas 2. AWcle Number 7~~9 141 []~02 1064 3394 PS Form 3811, February 2004 ~ Domestic Realm Receipt t tsao ~ ¦ Complete hems t, 2, and 3. Also corn ~4~ ~ l7 AHent - hem 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ? Addressee ¦ PrIM your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. R, oe by (Prhrtetl Nmrre) C. Date of DelNery ¦ Attach this card to the bads of the mailpiece, e or on the fi'ont N space pertnNs. Yas D. Is delivery eddmss dMerent t(f) 1. Article Addressed to: H YES, emer delNery wv: ~j Q ~C Gree~port Realty II, LLC a ~ `~N P.O.Box 6 ~ J Franklin Square, NY 11010 a service'type v ~CertlNed Malt ? E~rese Mali D Rephtered D Return Receipt for Merchandise " o ir>sured Mali ? c.o.D. 4. Restricted DelNery'1(Extra Fee) ? Y 2. An~leNumber 7009 1410 0002 1064 3417 (rransler born seMw label) PS Forth 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt tozsssoz-MaSno i ¦ compbm rbrr~e 1.2, erM a Abo a«nwem ~ roam a n rteabtcmd try re aealred ~ ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse X ~ 7! ~ ? so th~we can velum the card t0 you. e. (Printed Name/ c. e o Delh+ery ¦ Athddl this card m ttre befit of the mailpiece, ~ CPiL rl / a or on the front if space pemrits. D.b dMrereraM1cnl Item lT ?Yee 1. Ankle Addressed to: M YES, enter delhrery address bebvr. ? No Robert J. 6eCKef 'S; _ Carl Krebs FrimarKi°y 140 Nassau St. Apt.. tOC New York, NY 10038 : ~ a serNcelype p cedmea Man ? egress Men i - ? Regkt¦ed D Return Recelpttor Memhendlae ~ ? lrre+aed Mall ? c.o.D. I a. Resekxed Delivery! ~rxse Feel ? wa 2. Artlde Number j (marrrs/ertromaervioe~ ?Q9 1410 0002 1064 3387 PS Fore 3811, February 2004 ~ Return Receipt +ozsaso2-m-+sao ¦ Complete Items 1, 2, end 3. Also co plate A. re roam 4 ff Rsstrk~0ed Dellvi¦y to decked. / ~ D ? Agent ¦ Prim your name and address on the reverse U r.![C ? Addressee . so that we can return the card to you. B. by (Prir~sd Marne) G Date of veuy; ¦ Attach this card to the beds of the melipiece, or on the front H space Permits. - t. ArtIGe Addressed to: ~ D rem dlMererd from tram 1T ? N ~ ~ ¦ ¦ ¦ ~'I~ very address bebw: ? T 'a ~ r ; R D ~ s O o Spyros 8r Matt ifassiliou 8 2p10 ' , j , i= n ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 m . 147-01 38" Ave. ~ _ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ m ' Flushing, NY 11354 ~ i ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ m ? Regletared ? Retun Recept for ? (n O $ m 3g~aa ? Imawed Mau ? C.O.D. Q ~ a ~ ~ ~ m frn}Q ` a K a Reatrkted oeinreryT tExea Feel ? Oo j ~ ~ 0 3 ~ n ~ 2. Arede Number „n 7 m o ~ ~ 709 1410 0?02 164 3400 c ~ 3 c m ~ ~ ' PS Fomn 3811, February 2004 Dom~Mc Return Receipt + N O 0 ~ ~ ¦ Complete roams 1, 2. and S. Also plate A.. ~ ~ l~ a Ftem 4 N AeeMcDed DslNery b x - ~ ~ °o ¦ Pdm your name end address on the reverse ~ e so that we can return the card to you.. o ¦ Attach this card to the beds o1 the meilp(ece, NCI C. Date y ~ ° " ~ o m A or` on the front if space permits. a ~ ~ ' a" D. hda+Neryadtlreee dilferentfran Man lT 0 m ~ 1. Article Addressed to: , „ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ g , M YES, order delhrery eddreea bebw: w „e+ va ~ Su"san Lanfiray wy-Ne w ~ ~ s Nestor A. L:aMray „ - ~ ~ $3-85116n ~ ~ ~ , . ? ? o . Richmond H~, NY 114'Fe, a. servloelype ~ o > Cem¦ed Mall ? e~reoe Mall ~ ~ I $ , O ? Return Receipt for Mar ; ~ O° ~ s - p Irreured Man. ? co.D. ~ . ~ ~ . a. Reatrbted Dellveryt (F~ma Fes) O 1 //L~~ " 2. Artble Number ~ ? ~ ? ? 7009 141 ~?D2 1064 3325 ~ ~ o PS Form 3811, Febmay 2004 Domestb Return Receipt + + f''' S ffQCK SCOTT A. RUSSELL t~p~ ca~µ JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ~ ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAM ROAD ~~f ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (631)-765-9015 ~ t`,'~ Tel. (631)-765-1560 ~~al ~a~~h ]AMIE.RICHTER@TOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US - "7 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 27, 2010 , Martin H. Sidor Chairman -Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road . Southold, New York 11971 ' Re: Jemco Winery Site Plan .t~,~ SCTM 1000-35-01-24 State Route 25, Greenport NY Dear Mr. Sidor: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the Site Plan, dated April 14, 2010 forthe construction of a Retail Winery Facility. This site plan has been prepared and certified bythe office of Samuels & Steeleman, Architects. Please consider the following: 1. A State DOT Curb Cut Permit must be obtained for this project. 2. The proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. Therefore, this project will require coverage from New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. The Developer must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and obtain coverage under the SPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES from the DEC. Coverage under this 'CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Permit GP-0-10-001 is required prior to the commencement of any work. Please note, the Town of Southold is a regulated, tradlfi'onal land use control MS4. Therefore, the applicant must also submit an MS4 SW PPP Acceptance Form to the Town of Southold for review and approval prior to submission of the NOI to the DEC: If there are any questions regarding this DEC Permit, please refer to the DEC Website under Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. 3. Runoff coefficients found in the drainage calculations need to be changed with regard to impervious surfaces. Oil & Stone parking areas and other solid surfaces should use a coefficient of one, not 90%. In addition, all gravel driveway areas need to be included in the drainage calculations using a runoff coefficient of 60%. Drainage Calculations should be revised accordingly. Page 1 of 2 L . . Martin H. Sidor, Chairman -Planning Board August 27, 2010 Re: Jemco W finery Site Plan SCTM 1000-35-01-24 Page 2 of 2 4. The main facility has been designed with solid tanks for the storage of rainwater that will be used as site irrigation. This is considered a recommended practice but there is an additional requirement that call for additional BMP's or leaching basins to be designed and installed behind these storage facilities. If the solid tanks are full and it continues to rain, there needs to be a drainage system in place to recharge the excess storm water into the ground. The size of this leaching /storm water system must meet the minimum requirements of the DEC Construction Activity SPDES Permit GP-0-10-001. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. Si rely, `1~""W J mes A. Richter, R.A. cc: Southold Town Trustees Page I of 1 • • Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 12:19 PM To: 'nancy@samuelsandsteelman.com' Subject: FW: Jemco Winery Hi Nancy, Please see the below? Can you provide some projection to answer the question below so we can finalize the SEORA? Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy. W inser(c~town.southold. ny. us -----Original Message----- From: Terry, Mark Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 12:03 PM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Jemco Winery Kristy, Just a reminder that I need some data to qualify this statement. Impact on Transportation Potential impacts to traffic (generation and flow) resulting from the proposed use is expected to be low. Mark Terry Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (631) 765-1938 Mark _Ter~ a~town_southold. ny us 9/2/2010 9906 STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successively, commencing on the 2nd day of September, 2010. ~ 7~~ Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this day of 2010. VvV K~ CHp~S'fINA Vc OF NEW YORK 12050 ~ ( . - ~ ..~o: Febmary 20, 2012 ~~nmiss;,,n . . _:v MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~F ~~UTy P.O. Box 1179 MARTDQ H. SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair ~ `may OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y ~ Town Hall Annex JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~ ~ ~ 54375 State Route 25 DONALD J. WILCENSKI ~i~'C ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) QUN'(`~, Southold, NY Telephone: BSl 76S•1838 Fas: 631 766-5136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 13th day of September, 2010 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision for Daniel & Nancy Fischer located at 38785 NYS Rt. 25, Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-15-8-1.1 6:05 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for the JEMCO Winery located at 825 NYS Rt. 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the n/s/of NYS Route 25, in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-35-1-24 Dated: 8/23/10 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times Page 1 of 1 ' • • Kalin, Carol From: Legals [legals@timesreview.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 2:44 PM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: RE: Legal Ad for 9/2110 Suffolk Times Hi Carol, I have received the notice and we are good to go for the 9/2 issue. Thanks and have a great afternoon/evening! Candice From: Kalin, Carol [mailto.Carol.Kalin@town southold.ny.us] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 2:21 PM To: Legals Subject: Legal Ad for 9/2/10 Suffolk Times Please print the attached legal ad for the Planning Board's 9/13/10 public hearings re: Fischer Standard Subdivision and JEMCO Winery in the 9/2/10 edition of the Suffolk Times. An a-mail confirmation will be appreciated. Thanks. Carol Kalin, Secretarial Assistant Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Annex, 54375 NYS Rt. 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Carol.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us 8/23/2010 • • MAII.ING ADDRESS: PLANNIIVG BOARD MEMBERS ~OF $~Ury P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~0~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLL4M J. CREMERS y ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 4 ~ ~ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~ ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI I~CQ~ ~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 766-1835 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 13th day of September, 2010 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision for Daniel & Nancy Fischer located at 38785 NYS Rt. 25, Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-15-8-1.1 6:05 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for the JEMCO Winery located at 825 NYS Rt. 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the n/s/of NYS Route 25, in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-35-1-24 Dated: 8/23/10 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman ~ ~ . • STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 24th day of August, 2010 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 9/13/10 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Standard Subdivision for Daniel & Nancy Fischer, SCTM#1000-15-8-1.1 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for the JEMCO Winery, SCTM#1000-35-1-24 ~ Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this ~~~day of 1 ,(~~nt),~" , 2010. Nota //P ~ l"ic" MELANIE DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New YoAr No.01D04634870 Qualified in SuffolkCourdy f Commission Expires September 30, 20 r 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue NY 11935 ' (631) 734 6405 Fax (631) 734 6407 To: Kristy Winse From: Nancy Steelman Southold Town Planning Dept. Address:54375 Main Road Date: August 20, 2010 Southold, NY 11971 CC: Re: Jemco Winery ? Urgent x For Review ? Please Comment ? Please Reply Decription: 1. DEC Non Jurisdiction Letter 2. Correspondence from the NY State Office of Historic Preservation - Thank you ( 1 ~ ~ I( Nancy Steelman ; ' ~ auc 2 3 zo-- ~o S, , F,;_:° . ~ CfM"PYION.~,S,~ • • r" op ~ n a y a 0 - David A. Paterson a N~.v roax srarE Governor New York State Office of Parks, Carol Ash Recreation and Historic Preservation G°m°"'s~OOer Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau • Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 www.rrysparks.com August !6, 2010 Nancy Steelman Samules & Steelman Architects ?5235 Main Rd Cutchogue, New York l 1935 Re: SEQRA New Construction/Jemco Winery 825 SR 25/Stirling Vicinity/SOUTHOLD, Suffolk County lOPR04432 Dear Ms. Steelman: Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP} concerning your project's potential impact/effect upon historic and/or prehistoric cultural resources. Our staff has reviewed the documentation that you provided on your project. Preliminary comments and/or requests for additional information are noted on separate enclosures accompanying this letter. A determination of impactleffeet will be provided only atYer ALL documentation requirements noted on any enclosures have been met. Any questions concerning our preliminary comments and/or requests for additional information should be directed to the appropriate staff person identitied on each enclosure. In cases where a stale agency is involved in this undertaking, it is appropriate for that agency to determine whether consultation should take place with OPRHP under Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law. In addition, if there is any federal agency involvement, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations, "Protecr~n of Historic and Cultural Properties" 36 CFR S00 requires that agency to initiate Section 106 consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). When responding, please be sure to refer to the OPRHP Project Review (PR) number noted above. Sincerely, ~r4fJI r ~~}u Ruth L. Pierpont Director Enclosure An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency ('j pnrnea o~ re~yc~eo Pace, ...bv r. . • • ARCHEOLOGY COMMENTS lOPR04432 Based on reported resources, there is an archeological site in or adjacent to your project area. Therefore the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) recommends that a Phase 1 archeological survey is warranted for all portions of the project to involve ground disturbance, unless substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. If you consider the project area to be disturbed, documentation of the disturbance will need to be reviewed by OPRHP. Examples of disturbance include mining activities and multiple episodes of building construction and demolition. A Phase 1 survey is designed to determine the presence or absence of archeological sites or other cultural resources in the project's area of potential effect. The OPRHP can provide standards for conducting cultural resource investigations upon request. Cultural resource surveys and survey reports that meet these standards will be accepted and approved by the OPRHP. Our office does not conduct cultural resources surveys. A 36 CFR 61 qualified archeologist should be retained to conduct the Phase 1 survey. Many archeological consulting firms advertise their availability in the yellow pages. The services of qualified archeologists can also be obtained by contacting local, regional, or statewide professional archeological organizations. Phase 1 surveys can be expected to vary in cost per mile of right-of-way or by the number of acres impacted. We encourage you to contact a number of consulting firms and compare examples of each firm's work to obtain the best product. Documentation of ground disturbance should include a description of the disturbance with confirming evidence. Confirmation can include current photographs and/or older photographs of the project area which illustrate the disturbance (approximately keyed to a project area map), pas[ maps or site plans that accurately record previous disturbances, or current soil borings that verify past disruptions to the land. Agricultural activity is not considered to be substantial ground disturbance and many sites have been identified in previously cultivated land. Please also be aware that a Section 233 permit from the New York State Education Department ($ED) may be necessary before any archeological survey activities are conducted on State-owned Iand.If any portion of the project includes the lands of New York State you should contact the SED before initiating survey activities.The SED contact is Christina B. Rieth and she can be reached at (518) 402-5975. Section 233 permits are not required for projects on private lands. If you have any questions concerning archeology, please contact Daniel A. Bagrow at 518-237-8643. ext 3254 ^I1 I http://sphinx/PR/PMReadForm.asp?iPm=1&iFId=20491&sSFile=form4.htm 8/10/2010 New York State Departm~ of Environmental Conserv~on Division of Environmental Permits, Region 1 SUNY ~ Stony Brook r 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3409 Phone: (631) 444.0365 • Fax: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.nV.goy Alexander B. Grannis Commissioner LETTER OF NO JURISDICTION TIDAL WETLANDS ACT August 13, 2010 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Application #1-4738-03986/00001 Jemco Winery - 825 Rte 25, Greenport, SCTM # 1000-35-O1-24 Dear Sir/Madam: Based on the information you submitted, the Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that the property located landward of the crest of the bluff, as shown on the site plan prepared by Nancy L. Steelman, R.A., Samuels & Steelman Architects dated 4/14/10, is beyond Tidal Wetlands Act (Article 25) jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with the current Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) no permit is required. Be advised, no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the tidal wetlands jurisdictional boundary, as indicated above, without a permit. I[ is your responsibility to ensure that all precautions'are taken to prevent any sedimentation or disturbance within Article 25 jurisdiction which may result from your project. Such precautions may include maintaining adequate work area between the jurisdictional boundary and your project (i.e. a 15' wide construction area) or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hale bay berm. This letter shall remain valid unless site conditions change. Please note that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies or local municipalities. Si ely, 1 Per Administrator cc: Samuels & Steelman, 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Bureau of Habitat-TW, NYSDEC File • Page 1 of 1 Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:13 PM To: 'Nancy Steelman' Subject: RE: Jemco Winery Hey Nancy; I have not heard from them but glad to hear things are moving along! I believe that is all we will need to complete SEAR and have I have Mark from our office working on it already. Ideally I would like to have a determination made by the PH tentively scheduled for 9/13 but if not its ok. Keep me posted. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Kristy_Wnser town.southold.n~rus -----Original Message----- From: Nanty Steelman [maifto:panty@samuelsandsteelman.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:27 PM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Jemco Winery Hi Kristy, I just received the DEC Non Jurisdiction Letter for Jemco Winery and I will put a copy of it in the mail today for you. In addition, I have a received preliminary letter from the SHPO asking for additional information which I have provided to them. They said they would get a final letter out shortly. Have you heard anything from them yet? I know that you need that letter to finalize the SEQRA process. Is there anything left on your end that you are waiting for? Thanks, Nancy Samuels 8 Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY, 11935 631 734-6405 www.sam uelsandsteelman.com 9/2/2010 ' • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~QF ~~Ury P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~0~ 0/_ Southold, NY 11971 Chair ~ ~ OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DONALD J. WILCENSKI `xCOUl~ ~l~% Southold, NY Telephone: 831 765-1935 Fas: 831 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 10, 2010 Ms. Nancy Steelman c/o Samuels & Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Set Hearing: Proposed Site Plan for JEMCO Winery Located at 825 NYS Route 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25, Greenport SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Ms. Steelman: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, August 9, 2010: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, September 13, 2010 at 6:05 p.m. for a public hearing at the Southold Town Hall regarding the site plan dated April 14, 2010, prepared by Samuels & Steelman, Architects, for the above- referenced application. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed preen return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Fridav September 10th The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encls. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Prouertv Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-35-1-24; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-80 Zoning District; 4. That the application is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located at 825 NYS Rt. 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25, in Greenport; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. &NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2"d FI., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. The Planning Board Office will be closed on Monday, September 6~h 6. Information can also be obtained via the Internet by sending an a-mail message to: Carol.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us; 7. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Mondav. September 13. 2010 at 6:05 g.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: JEMCO Realty Associates, LLC Date: 8/10/10 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail -return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri.. 9/10/10 Re: Proposed Site Plan for JEMCO Winery SCTM#s: 1000-35-1-24 Date of Public Hearing: Mondav. September 13, 2010.6:05 p.m. Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows § 55-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L. No. 12-2003) Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application or petition is complete, the boazd or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. Notice relating to a public hearing on an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A. Town responsibility for publication of notice. The reviewing board or commission shall cause a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiated, proposed or requested by an applicant or petitioner, other than a Town boazd or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: (1) The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, giving notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than 10 feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant, petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall include description of the street location and azea of the subject property, nature of relief or approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant, petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. 1 JEMCO WINERY SITE PLAN FOR JEMCO REALTY ~?SSOCIATES LLC 1000-35-1-24 Proposal for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District. • MONDAY -SEPT. 13, 2010 - 6:05 P.M. R sianisa vnwrue r a.. .ws.w. . _ rew w M~..vs - ~ OIONl(lOS nwa i Q MlOjjflS j0 A1Nf10~ 3~IlON ai.voue .n aeuuuo ` ...m ' ssx+n - •n.w.rw - - ON N011]35 \ \ ~ ~ J s kd . is ~ rv,t=a ~ aLt' M Olp11fIDS umswa s)d'ts / mw p P pn9•t a ~ Pnnt ~ °p^ i[t ~ , R rzt o[ • d~ °t' yt cn nnrtoau ,}r r2t [ y o e e [t ayp e 4y °7' nzt m.' 171N1 W~""+~" 5 e S p `f o 131N/ oa[ 1>nrc mrrz i~ ONOd T/p s~~ P P t4 ~ L aNQd r2[ - P E s 9 - d'I ti w ? L 0 p~ w TIlp S s atw s ~ 6'9 ''s, i o sy e ~ s iw g ~ s .dam yr. S~ tb pnrl c e d ~yr p e . ? ~ -'etr PnOtil F IZI ? t [ sy i p . P `~4 Sb ~ ° ~ A° ~p ~o riroG e ~ ~ as P 9 ~ 4 P 6 ? - ~ uv~m»a'ren - (y~4 `p a t .,DFV ssP s of s, F~ P?6at ° ~ £ a. P t 9 -.G. ~ O '4 s~ ~ ~ 0 rig .6 NI- ° a'~' y' P a 3 ii... i FC, Cx dI ~A P 4 t~' s p p p * rt-[ ru ~w Hwy it I i OL B P P- MA-• I ' L-' ~j .i: 4 - ~ i r 5~ "•b N W I . ~ Y ~ w~ 1 c ~q~ si o e z:' rs1 4•, ,.G ~ r sr' ~ t rte' r I s i a'd' . ` ru si „ - ~ as ~5 n `y F a ~ p ~ ' P P~ ry ~~4 ~ s' ~ ~ e Oy a~ a a ~y IGY I p 9 O-H- e ~A~e Sy 1~ 40.01 yy I~rvtu i ~ 1 i [>ns~ o. ~ e tzc s° e p~~ -p. 3 4~~e Pp a ~tarzf _~q -o •c P~9 O. OW gtl 01 ww ~j _,~p't o-znc ~ t' O 10-x1-si + ar 0 °;yo; i ? _tao-xo-oto P~5 Oy kJf, 4 ~d" o-K.t >r>n m r Jf O-W- b'IV W ~ ! 11 - Mlm LY w-z z.. - ~ z o` o.,a- T.,.- i lv-o~ ~5~00~ 4 t•~ 5~]•-0 -N- n taor w- a. Y J tors ^n. eo. s[c sEC xo. tom s . AB a O s N Tamno _ ? ~O °e - ~ a 4 ' 4 day Oh ' , ym X.TU ~1 ~ . ~ fi a p„P a 'j' d ~ ~Z ~O n a l I 4 A P SAO _ +aS a T r~ ' 4 , bt l 4 fi +5y J~ y a • t• 'D 9 a 'f' K+^• O _ / ~p + ate o $ ~ y+. < P fi ^,pT t e +yy a fi a+ ~ 4 6s 5+~ A fi ~G ° 'y + m +5at b Oe o ~ ~y ? y t+ 0 a o ~ Ry vim/ \ +'st° ~ ''tr+v r - 'i° w' / ~ w H•. t w tl w tt • e. X _ e ~ S ' t5 ~ t tax a ~I' resign d{Ay~ • s • 5 \ 5t ' N a5 fi Two ~+`'R, ~ ~ • ~ + eta t e" + • M T 4Vtc1 m 5 s 9 w C~ O Y~ - raurt LtNp O~ 4 a^^ a ^uw I P O w 5•+5 e e sonxau ` c vt ° y +iµ' +y~ Jb u z• IA ~ yt i 5 ` a ,y me rw N.o tt q 4 ~ ,.9 ~ewRaenr 2 voYci +ES l~ ~ -Zpe. aaa +6 J c ,,..,_,w .e,.e b.^oM..w .e~,•^ NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E rw•a SOUTHOLD sECriop E ^.w~r~..~ er~w diw~ (11 r .r... r^c aw^..o o-srncrs rTm+ w[ w„ .e ~ ^s ^-..-.w --r-- ..-.~,w R d ty Tax Service y r o >y 9i ~ fgvN -N- a 4S S0. IA3 ~ tl.04J 9L O ~ M1 O a ' ' O ~ i ~ ~ ~,i i ice/ ~ ri ' e i /'6 ~ °•i' gym. z~ i >"v . / 4 i ~ ~ ~ i' t . i r a ~ i ? 'C i i r ? ` r ~ is , r r V~ o r\? ~ ~ r ~ . • + s ~ A \ \ \ fit= s ~r~'~ - ? r its 9(~ ? ~ r • \9 y} '°O i ytaP' \ V c ? ? \ \ \ r = 2'-n S• a a, a p yQ _ , \\r\\ ? i ,A' a qw~ ?^Ys S,O•r~ \ r.` • r _ =U QVZ, .y ~ \ \ \\r S r S.s+ l i - ~ • $ i~ ~ ® \ ~r' ~ r\r ss3\ r0~ ' ~ s. > dP° 4F O vacs sa s v ~ ~ r\\° r\\ 3~ ~i pF, FS:p rmrt a sourxuo 4 ~ ~ ~ • \ III \ ) b auwnsn iew Pr n\ ° r \q r OS. \ ° ~ o v sq Sti. R Ftia ~CQ ' nun - r• a ~ !Q~ • • `.~^s• "i ' \ ~ • xu,svm ~ sx,w,xa i ~ •+.nr~•u. seau..u.r re ox sn.w„e.w --sw- q..•..nuw w.sss nr~u•rs[. •u nnovsnr[s NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E 10M6 SOUTHOLD secraN No .ac mrr r.[ [a.a•:a mrwcrs E o..~...a... ,,..•..,.e~., cup 0 rw.....w - • _ a [t,[. [swr[suHx,I[rFwna4s•[[w Red Property Tox Service Agency r ,u,~6 G W. w v ~ y y,~, y p:1rt. w - • - - Y.v'I~M[. w 16r iN XYAW. ON ~r r.rG rssreu,u, u un xniux o M tatnty Center Povxlaaq N , 119N 0 3 4 N iws ~ v.. -•l-• YM ren r w - W. s.ne. w - - i rre ~ w : ew PFNS[ SUffa4 [NRV iu WP 6 pMdifD ~ 'FLL[ M [lFi: M ~ O r..•w, x1 ~ sr izt ua a uu ~ a. s... w - - a..a. sn. w ueu.xx usm.rze rnwus emrw rcm6me v r~ v s u e° V as on . ~ m>ct .e IOOO PROPERTY NPP (mw•f Y. I3.I MC1 Rw w Lw wnt. w 5 REK Rlm@n rt% X1MCC .R1Cl. . S~~'~~ Sanford Hanauer, Chairperson Town Hall Annex 1C~.J Reynolds duPont, Jr. S}1$~F~~~' 54375 Route 25 Herbert Ernest ti~ ~ PO Box 1179 Joseph Lee ~ Southold, NY 11971 Ronald McGreevy Howard Meinke j, ~ Fax (631) 765-6641 Nicholas Planamento 'llQl ,~4~' Telephone: (631) 765 - 1892 Mark Schwartz ~ southoldtown.northfork.net Elizabeth Thompson Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4:OOp.m., July 29, 2010 Town Hall Annex Executive Board Room Members Present: Sandy Hanauer, Chairperson; Joseph Lee; Ronald McGreevy; Howazd Meinke; Nicholas Planamento; Tamara Sadoo, Planner; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary _ ~ 2010 The minutes for the May 20, 2010 meeting were approved. E`. Introduction: All applicants will give a presentation consisting of drawings, exterior materials samples and other information required by the Planning Department to the Committee. The Committee will ask questions and make suggestions as part of a general discussion with each applicant. Final recommendations from the ARC will be presented to the Planning Board in the ARC Meeting Minutes, and be made part of the Planning file for that application. The Planning Boazd will consider these recommendations, together with all comments from other agencies, and provide the applicant with a comprehensive written list of its requested revisions. New Apylications: • JEMCO WINERY SCTM#:1000-35-1-24 Nancy Steelman, Architect presented the project to the committee. The Committee approves the project as submitted today. The conunittee would also like to thank Ms. Steelman for incorporating the feeling of the North Fork into the architecture of this project. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. A motion was made to close the meeting at 5:OOp.m. All in favor, B zabeth Cantrell, A.R.C. Secretary • • Page 1 of 1 Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 4:11 PM To: 'Nancy Steelman' Subject: RE: Jemco Winery Public Hearing Nancy, good timing! The Public hearing is not a problem since it has not been scheduled as of yet. Just let me know and verify when you would like to have it scheduled. Are you still ok with the ARC tentatively scheduled for the end of July? I have not received anything from either DEC or the Trustees as of yet however, Mark Terry from our office is reviewing the SEOR where he has determined that the property is indicated on the circle and squares map as having historical significance. As such, you will need to inquire with the NYS Office of Parks, Rec, and Historical Preservation. We will need a letter from them to move forward with the SEOR process. Please copy us on your correspondences for our file. For your convenience, i have additional copies of the map i printed from their website if you would like one. Let me know if you have other questions. Thank you! Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Krist~Winser town.southold,ny us -----Original Message----- From: Nancy Steelman [mailto:nancy@samuelsandsteelman.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:34 PM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Jemco Winery Public Hearing Hi Kristy, My client will not be able to attend the August 9th Public Hearing for Jemco Winery. He was wondering if we could postpone it until the Sept.l3th meeting? Let me know if that works. Also, have you received a non jurisdiction letter or waiver from the Trustees or DEC as of yet? I am required to submit them along with the SEQRA determination to the Health Department. Thanks, Nancy Samuels & Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY, 11935 631 734-6405 www.sam uelsandsteelman.com 7/1/2010 RIAYOR ~ ~A,C~' CLERIC OAVIO NYCE SYLVIA LA77ARI PIRILLO ~(L E{L?IS Eu. alfi ~f TRUSTEES '[REASURER GEORGE HUERARDJR. SUSAN PIANO ~FPIlTI'AIAYOR Ecl.?I7 MICHAELOSINSEI y' rFSt I~t4 `l MARY EESS PHILLIPS ~`~I Y A O~ Tel: Ifi311477-ICJH CHRISTINA REM1IPNER FR{: (6)I I J77-I N77 ?3fi'i'1IIRH S'I'REF'1' OjtU~yPQR~[\ I ~l'ORK i l J.IJ Martin H. Sidor, Chairperson J 1 1/ Southold Town Planning Board ~ ~,1 ~ ~ln I~ ~ ~l i ' Town of Southold / Southold Town Annex x----=-- 53095 Route 25 / Southold, NY 11965 ~ Re: Application ofJemco/ 1000-35-I-24 Deaz Chairperson Sidor: The subject property is located in the unincorporated portion of the Village of Greenport. The Village of Greenport is generally in favor of the improvement of property that is located in or in the vicinity of the Village and in our community and area. The site is in a location that has the potential for significant impact on the Village due to the potential for creation of new traffic through the Village and alteration of existing traffic flows. The access and egress will be on a major roadway that is the sole transportation route for Connecticut and Orient traffic, as well as the emergency route for emergency service providers, and proper and safe access and egress with properly designed signaling and direction must be provided for that reason. The Village would like to request that the Planning Board require site plan to provide for adequate screening from adjacent sites and the roadway with mature plantings that are protected by a maintenance and replacement covenant. The Village would also request that the Planning Board require signage that is not intrusive and which is consistent with the character of the neighborhood and community. The Village does not wish to adopt lead agency status but the Village would like to be recognized as an interested agency and receive~appropriate notices of all hearings and public meetings on this matter and copies of any relevant submissions or determinations, and that the application is indicated as a Type I action with a positive declaration. Thank yon for your consideration. Sincerely, David Nyce, May r Village of Greenport i MAYOR ~ 44 t A~j~` • CLERK DAVID NYCE 1~V O~ SYI VIA LAZZARI PIRILLO Ex[.?IS V Fxt. 206 TRUSTEES TRM;AtiURER .SUSAN PISANO GEORGY:HUftftARD,1R DEPUTY MAYOR L Ext. 21] M ICHAEI.OSINSKI V ~ ~t 1838 •1 MARY BESS PHILLIPS ~~EN~~~ 'feL (63 1 14 77-02 4R CHRISTINA KEMPNER Yux. 163 1 1 4774 H77 2361'HIKD STR55T (f2u~~I'{)R~~FI~YORK 11944 Martin H. Sidor, Chairperson JJ I Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold / Southold Town Annex 53095 Route 25 / Southold, NY 11965 Re: Application of Jemco / 1000-35-1-24 Dear Chairperson Sidor: The subject property is located in the unincorporated portion of the Village of Greenport. The Village of Greenport is generally in favor of the improvement of property that is located in or in the vicinity of the Village and. in our community and area. 7`he site is in a location that has the potential for significant impact on the Village due to the potential for creation of new traffic through the Village and alteration of existing traffic flows. The access and egress will be on a major roadway that is the sole transportation route for Connecticut and Orient traffic, as well as the emergency route for emergency service providers, and proper and safe access and egress with properly designed signaling and direction must be provided for that reason. The Village would like to request that the Planning Board require site plan to provide for adequate screening fTOn' ~lJ:2l'Pnf. ~iiec ar)d tl)e rOad`d!a}' wlt}t ma*:)T° j 1Rntlr,~c tFiat aT? rrntarf2~j h~ ~ m^_1;,tPn,a~t:E' 2^:~ T°n~?~P?r!r covenant. The Village would also request that the Planning Board require signage that is not intrusive and which is consistent with the character of the neighborhood and community. The Village does not wish to adopt lead agency status but the Village would like to be recognized as an interested agency and receive appropriate notices of all hearings and public meetings on this matter and copies of any relevant submissions or determinations, and that the application is indicated as a Type 1 action with a positive declaration. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely. David Nyce, May r Village of Greenport MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBER"s ~~OF SOUry~ ~u ~ id~IVY iis71 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~O Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS u+ ac Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ ,a0~ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ,M (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND l`~epu~, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 76b-1938 Faz: 631 785-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: NYS DEC From: Kristy Wineer, Senior Planner Date: June 9, 2010 Re: Site Plan Application review - JEMCO Winery • Request for comments pursuant to General Municipal Law §239 (as a referral) and Southold Town Code §280-131, and LWRP Coastal Consistency Review • SEQR Lead Agency Request • Coordinated Review under SEQR Deaz Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to seek comments from your agency, and also to determine lead agency and coordinate review under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. Please provide the following, as applicable: 1. Comments or requirements the Planning Board should take into consideration while reviewing the proposed project; 2. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated; 3. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; and 4. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency under SEQR. The lead agency will determine the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other (see comments below) Southold Referral & SEQR Coordination Page Two June 9, 2010 Comments: This 60 acre site has an existing vineyard located the north side of Route 25, Greenport. The site extends to the L.I. Sound whereas the applicant is proposing an 8,419 s.f. building for the purposes of a retail winery located approximately at a 500' foot setback from the 100' foot bluff setback line. It should be noted that the ground floor area of the building is 3,349 s.f. with a basement area and mezzanine. Project Name: JEMCO Winery Address: 825 NYS Rt. 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25, Greenport. Tax Map 1000-35-1-24 Requested Action: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 s.f. building with associated parking for the purposes of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25. SEQRA Classification: O Type I ( )Type II (X) Unlisted Contact Person: Kristy Winee, Sr. Planner (631)765-1938 Enclosures: • Environmental Assessment Form • Site Plan Application Form • Site Plan(s) (site plans sent only to above agencies indicated by an 2 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~pf SOUTyo P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~Q ~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLL9M J. CREMERS u+ ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDSGi~ ~ ~p~ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH LDTOWNSEND 1~C0(!~ (cor. M Sou h dYNY ~ Ave.) Telephone: 831 786-1838 Fax: 831 78b-5138 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 2, 2010 Chief Greenport Fire Department P.O. Box 58 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Request for review on site plan application for JEMCO Winery SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Dear Chief: The enclosed site plan application, referenced above, is being referred to you for your comment on matters of interest to the fire department, including fire department equipment access, emergency services, and any other, issue that may be of concern or relevance to this application. Please respond with your recommendations at your eazliest convenience. Project Description: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 s.f. building with associated pazking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District located approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of New York State Route 25, Greenport. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, /J Kristy Wins~~~~~eN ~~~J~ Senior Planner Encls: Site Plan Application Site Plan c~.c~/o ck.#a . MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~aOF $0(/ryO SouthOold~NY 11971 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~Q Chair r _r J~ J! OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS en ac Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ ~@ 54375 State Route 25 OSEPH LDTOWN END O~yCOU„Ty'~ (cor. Mas Rd. aYlou~ngs Ave.) IY ~ ~ Telephone: 631 766-1938 Fax: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Village of Greenport* From: I{risty Wineer, Senior Planner Date: June 2, 2010 Re: Site Plan Application review - JEMCO Winery • Request for comments pursuant to General Municipal Law §239 (as a referral) and Southold Town Code §280-131, and LWRP Coastal Consistency Review • SEQR Lead Agency Request • Coordinated Review under SEQR Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to seek comments from your agency, and also to determine lead agency and coordinate review under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Envirorunental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. Please provide the following, as applicable: 1. Comments or requirements the Planning Boazd should take into consideration while reviewing the proposed project; 2. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated; 3. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; and 4. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency under SEQR. The lead agency will determine the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other (see comments below) Southold Referral & SEQR Coordiuatiou Page Two 3une 2, 2010 Comments: This 60 acre site has an existing vineyazd located the north side of Route 25, Greenport. The site extends to the L.I. Sound whereas the applicant is proposing an 8,419 s.f. building for the purposes of a retail winery located approximately at a 500' foot setback from the 100' foot bluff setback line. It should be noted that the ground floor azea of the building is 3,349 s.f. with a basement area and mezzanine. Project Name: JEMCO Winery Address: 825 NYS Rt. 25, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25, Greenport. Tax Map 1000-35-1-24 Requested Action: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 s.f. building with associated parking for the purposes of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District, approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25. SEQRA Classification: OType I ()Type II (X) Unlisted Contact Person: Kristy Winee, Sr. Planner (631)765-1938 Enclosures: • Environmental Assessment Form • Site Plan Application Form • Site Plan(s) (site plans sent only to above agencies indicated by an 2 ! • '~Pn Jill M. Doherty, President -``~QF S~(/~yO Town Hall Annex Y James F. King, Vice-President ti~ 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen l~[ * Southold, New York 11971-0959 Bob Ghosio, Jr. G C John Bredemeyer .'ntO ~ ~O Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 1y00UNi'1,N BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner , FROM: Jill M. Doherty, President Board of Trustees DATE: June 1, 2010 Jl" ~i^ RE: JEMCO WINERY 825 MAIN RD., GREENPORT SCTM#35-1-24 The Board of Trustees reviewed the site plan prepared by Samuels & Steelman Architects dated April 14, 2010 and determined the proposed construction of an 8,419 sf. building with associated parking to be out of the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 275 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 111 of the Town Code. Please be advised that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of an may take place seaward of the tidal and/or freshwater wetlands jurisdictional boundary or seaward of the coastal erosion hazard area, or within 100' landward from the top of the bluff and/or wetlands jurisdictional boundary, without further authorization from the Southold Town Board of Trustees pursuant to Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code. Please let us know if we can be of any further assistance. ___/1I,~\\f7 1 ~ IM_ • • ~~1 "`rrr"___ ~a 4eT-oe. a STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUG E, N.Y. 1 7788-5518 SUBIMAL CMAKRABO RTI. P.E. STANLEY GEE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ACTINGCOMMISSIONER May 28, 2010 2 2010 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC P.O. Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 Town of Southold May 17, 2010 Submission Proposed Jemco Wince NY 25. Greenport SCTM No. 1000-03500-0100-024000 Our Case No. 10-17669P Dear Sir or Madam: This is to acknowledge receipt of the subject submission. We have no objection to the Town of Southold assuming Lead Agency status for this project; however, in order to work within the right-of--way of NY 25, a NYSDOT Highway Work Permit will be required. The submitted plan is very helpful; however, it does not contain sufficient information to progress a meaningful review by our staff. We recommend that your design professional consult our driveway policy manual, which is available on our website at www.nysdot.eov. On the NYSDOT A-Z bar click on "H," then click on Highway Work Permits and then click on Policy and Standards for the Design of Entrances to State Highways. In addition to the driveway design, the publication contains a complete list of items to include on submitted site plans. All work and material details shall be shown referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers. Please submit five (5) copies of site plans, revised as indicated above, directly to us so that we can commence our review of proposed work. Plan sheets should be no larger than 24" x 36" and should all be the same size. In addition, the attached NYSDOT Region 10 Project Information Checklist should be fully completed and returned to us with the plan submission. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I-495, (whichever is farther south), to Long Island Sound in the north. Jemco Realty Associates, LLC. ~ May 28, 2010 Page 2 of 2 Questions conceming this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the address above. Please always refer to the subject Case Number and the County Tax Map Number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. Saari SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachment: NYSDOT Region 10 Project Information Checklist cc: r. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold . Martin Sidor, Planning Boazd Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold Long Island North Shore Heritage Area Planning Commission SAS:MDW:ajf _ _ _ ~r ~ ~P6 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~ r a 0 STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING THOMAS A. ISLES, A.I.C.P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING May 25, 2010 Town of Southold Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11935 Att: Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Dear Ms. Winser. Pursuant to Section 2391 & m of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan/special exception which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there appeazs to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan S.C.T.M. No. Jemco Winery 1000 03500 0100 n? ~ - _ I _ ~S ~~n ~ L~ Local File No. - ~~---~I I N/A JUN ' 1 2010 Seuhold Town Comments: Pfznning Roa~~+ 1. The `Yop of bluff' should be re-flagged in the field by a qualified expert, verified by the appropriate regulatory agency and shown on all surveys, maps, plans, plats or sketches associated with this action. The rate of erosion on site should be calculated by the expert. 2. No structure (including sanitary systems) should be located within 100 feet of the "top of bluff." In those areas where the shoreline or bluff is eroding at a rate that exceeds 2 feet per year the minimum setback from the top of bluff for a proposed structure should be established by the use of the following formula: Minimum setback = 50 x erosion rate, in feet per year. Modification of the minimum 100 foot setback should only be considered when evidence is provided by an expert, such as a coastal engineer or geologist that the bluff is not eroding. 3. The Coastal Erosion Hazard Line should be flagged in the field by a qualified expert, verified by the appropriate regulatory agency and shown on all surveys, maps, plans, plats or sketches associated with this action. 4. No structure should be located within one hundred feet (100') of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P. O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 w 5. Within 50 feet of the top edge of the bluffthere should not be any grading except that may be necessary to control or remedy erosion or to prevent storm water from flowing over the edge of the bluff. Cleazing and cutting within this area should be limited to that necessary for proper maintenance and removal of diseased, decayed or dead material and obnoxious plant species. Such clearing and grading should be subject to review by the Town to insure proper maintenance and preservation ofthe natural buffer. 6. No storm water runoff resulting from the implementation of this site plan should be dischazged to the bluff. 7. Private access structures to the beach through the bluffshould be prohibited. Direct access to a beach or bluff should be limited to community or public access features. 8. A conservation or scenic easement having a minimum width of at least 50 feet should be established landward along the top of bluff to insure that no development adverse to the aesthetic quality of the bluff will take place. 9. This property is located in an area that is subject to erosion. The granting of a Local Determination on this petition by the Suffolk County Planning Commission does not guarantee the safety of the development nor does the County of Suffolk Assume any liability for future damage to structures or property. The petitioner should be required to acknowledge in writing to the Planning Board that the approval of the action, with or without conditions, in no way commits either the Town or the County of Suffolk to any program to protect the property from shoreline erosion through the construction of engineering or other works. 10. The private driveway to service the proposed winery should be brought up to Town specification and standards. 11. The private road/driveway should be given a distinctive name and properly signed to facilitate the location of the winery served by the private road/driveway by police, fire equipment and other emergency services. NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, Thomas A. Isles, AICP Direr of la ' ndrew P. Fre! nts g Chief Planner APF:ds LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P. O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 ~ JEMCO REALTY ASSOCIATES LLC P.O. BOX 67 Greenport, New York 11944 May 21, 2010 VIA HAND DELIVERY Southold Town Planning Department Attn: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner 53095 Main Road Southold, NY Re: Proposed Winery - JEMCO Realty Associates. LLC 3 s- I - Deaz Ms. Winser: Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $2,542.00 payable to the Southold Town Planning Department for the site plan fee for the proposed winery referenced above. Please feel free to call me at (917) 750-6547 with any questions. Sin y, ichael E. Kontokosta, Esq. '~Q~~ • r~ ~Ynt PROJECT SLOPING MVO k~ ~vlT r Ts. PLANNING APPLICATIONS May 18, 2010 9:30pm _Pto'ect name: ~JEMCO Wine SCTM# 1000 35 1-24 - - - ----1-- _ - E Location_ -i 825 Route 25, Greenport ~ Description: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 s f building with associated parking for the purposes of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the !t R-80 Zoning District,-------,------------------------------------~ ~,Status_ _ New Site Plan_ L-_-_~-..._-._-._-.____.~_-_~- t v~u/' „5_.._JX~_.-.-___-p/1-_.-__.~~L/ir S I -t-~-._. ~ . - ~ ~~_J~~ gip-., . -i--~ _ 1 SCTM#: 120-3-5 4 ! Project name: _ Re ina's Garden ~ Location: 1150 Sound_Ave, Mattituck_ ~ Description: Zonin Board of Appeals Request for Comments. Status: Nee Ian /~aaJ/1 a~ j--^ ~------tom`. _..Nr1-t~cG_.~ Pro'ect name: Valero Service ation _-SCTM#: 1000-102-5-26 Location: _ on the n/_w_comer of Main Road and Dot Lane, Cutchoc,~ue Description ~ This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop ~ and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. _i{ r Status: !Under Review _ _ _ r------- Project name: Southold Free L rary Expan SCTM# 611-1-14, 15.1 & 15~°~+~ ~ Location: i 53705 Main Road Southold _ _ - Descri tion:_ _ - Status:-------- New sit~lan --------------------------------------------------j - I ACtIOn: _ _ 1, _ -a Attachments: ~1 ~Cti~rc~- /1~I'i~--c3-~- a ~~s~,~;,~.~u., o~~ o ~G~r s M,r S5 ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ SS -o ~~~.-,...J 6lJcs ~o~.~ ~fv,,/J l ~fh _ • ~ ~ Page 1 of 1 Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 10:33 AM To: 'Nancy Steelman' Subject: RE: Jemco Winery Yes Nancy, the $2,542 is the correct fee. I will but this confirmation in the file for our records. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy. W inser(c'iltown.southold. ny. us -----Original Message----- From: Nancy Steelman [mailto:nancy@samuelsandsteelman.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 10:01 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Jemco Winery Hi Kristy, Just want to confirm that the fee for the Site Plan Approval is 52542.00 This is based on the Fee Summary that I submitted with the applications. Could you get back to me so I can have my clients send a check. Thanks, Nancy Steelman Samuels 8 Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY, 11935 631 734-6405 www.samuelsandsteelman.com 5/19/2010 ~ S~ ~f ~o • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING $OARD MEMBERS ~~Of SQUryO ~ P O 1d,oNY 11971 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~O Chair ~ ~ OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS d+ a~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ipQ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~rouhm,~' Southold, NY Telephone: 631 766-1938 Faa: 631 76b-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Planning Commission* Southold Town Board of Trustees* Suffolk County Water Authority* Southold Town Building Department New York State Department of Transportation* Southold Town Engineer* Southold Town ARC From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: May 17, 2010 RE: Site Plan Application review - JEMCO WINERY • Request for comments pursuant to General Municipal Law §239 (as a referral) and Southold Town Code §280-131, and LWRP Coastal Consistency Review. • SEQR Lead Agency request • Coordinated review under SEQR Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to seek comments from your agency, and also to determine lead agency and coordinate review under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. Please provide the following, as applicable: 1. Comments or requirements the Planning Board should take into consideration while reviewing the proposed project; 2. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated; 3. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; and 4. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency under SEQR. Southold Referral & 5EQR Coordination Page Two May 17, 2010 The lead agency will determine the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interestin beinglead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other (see comments below) Comments: This 60 acre site has an existing vineyard located the north side of Route 25, Greenport. The site extends to the L.I. Sound whereas the applicant is proposing an 8,419 s.f. building for the purposes of a retail winery located approximately a 500' foot setback from the 100' foot bluff setback line. It should be noted the ground floor area of the building is 3,349 s.f. with a basement area and mezzanine. Project Name: JEMCO Winery Address: Tax Map 1000-35-1-24 Requested Action: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 S.F. building with associated parking for the purposes of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District located approximately 200 east of Batley Road on the north side of route 25. SEQRA Classification: ()Type I ( )Type II (X) Unlisted Contact Person: Kristy Winser, 5r. Planner (631)765-1938 Enclosures: • Environmental Assessment Form • Site Plan Application Form • Site Plan(s) (site plans sent only to above agencies indicated by an 2 • JEMCO WINERY Site Plan Approval Fee Required Flat fee - $500 $500/acres - 2.4 acres (building, parking, driveways) x $500 = $1,200 Gross SF x.10 = 8419 x .10 = $841.90 or 842.00 TOTAL: $2542 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, May 17, 2010 4:00 p.m. Site Plans rProject name: JEMCO Winery _ SCTM#: ~ 1000--35-1-24 Location: _ 825 Route 25, Greenport _ Description: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 s.f. building with ass teaco ii d parking for the purposes of a retail winery on 60.33 acres. located in the R-80Zonin District_________________________________ i Status: New Site Plan _ _ Action: Review Staff Report and site plan materials. Recommend that the ~ Planning Board accepts the application for review and begins the SEQ process. Attachments:_ Staff Report ' Project name: T-Mobile Northeast ,SCTM#: 1000-109-2-17.1 ~ Location: ,The Pres~erian Church or Society of Cutchogue, 27245 Main Road Description: The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless communication facility having interior mounted antennae within an ~ ~ existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened ~ from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove ~ and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zonin~c District Status: Site Plan Review__ _ _ Action: Review new submission. Attachments: Staff Report, Letter from licant 1 Project name: _ T-Mobile NE at Orient Fire Distric SCTM#~ 1000-18-5-13.8 Location: s/s/o Main Road at the s/e intersection of Main and Tabor Roads, Orient Description: Wireless Facility. Proposed co-location of internally mounted antenna t~ an existing 90-foot monopole structure by adding a 10-foot extension (total 100 feet) and related equipment area on a 4.4-acre parcel in the R- 80 Zone Status: _ Amended Site Plan & Special Exception { Action: ~ Review draft ZBA comments. -i------------------ Attachments:_ - ~ Draft Comments _ _ Project name: Barb's Veg_ ies____ _LSCTM#:11000-86-1-15_ ___i Location: _ _ 4195 SR 25, Peconic _ _ ~ escription Hothouse/Greenhouse _ ~ Status fiO_pen_ _ Action: Accept for review;_be~in referralprocess._ _ _ _i I Attachments: Staff Report WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, May 3, 2010 4:00 p.m. Applications Pro'ect name: JEMCO Wine SCTM#: 1000-35-1-24 Location: 825 Route 25, Green ort. Description: This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 S.F. building with associated parking forthe purposes of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zonin District. Status: New Site Ian Action: Review staff report and site plan materials. Recommend that the Planning Board accepts the application for review and begins the SEAR rocess. Attachments: Staff Re ort. Pro'ect name: Re ina's Garden SCTM#: 120-3-5 Location: 1150 Sound Ave, Mattituck Descri tion: Zonin Board of A eals Re nest for Comments. Status: New site lan Action: _ Review draft comm_ ents Attachments: Draft memo,_`_, Subdivisions Pro'ect name: N8~L Pro ernes, LP SCTM#: 1000-73-01-01 Location: _ Ore on Road, Cutcho ue Description: Proposed 3 lot standard. subdivision on 5.814 acres in the R-80 zoning district Status: O en Action: Review field submission Attachments: Send draft letter to applicant re: insufficient yield Pro'ect name: _ Aries Estates/Tull~ SCTM#: 1000- 22.-3-2 Location: The property is located at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way which extends north from Ka lei h's Court in East Marion. i Description: This proposal is for a standard subdivision of an 11.4418-acre parcel into two lots, where Lot 1 equals 3.7362 acres, including 1.4354 acres of open space, and Lot 2 equals 7.6786 acres, including 5.0872 acres of _ oMen space, in the R-80 Zoning District. Status: Sketch Approval _ i Action: Review erosion mitigation plan submitted Attachments: ,Staff Resort . ~ ~ ~ ~ eP s~ e S A M U E L S& S T E E L M A N April 14, 2010 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road - Southold, NY 11971 - - 1~~~ Re: Site Plan Approval aPR j Jemco Winery - 825 Main Road (Route 25) Greenport NY 11944 SCTM 1000-35-01-24 Dear Board Members, As per the Notice of Disapproval from the Town of Southold Building Department dated April 5, 2010, we are submitting the following documents for Site Plan Approval. 1. Notice of Disapproval 2. Site Plan Application 3. Applicants Affidavit 4. Agent Authorization 5. Environmental Assessment Form (EAF -Part 1) 6. LWRP Consistency Assessment 7. Fee Calculation 8. 4 Surveys (Peconic Surveyors) 9. 9 sets of Site Plan Documents a. SP-1 Overall Site Plan b. SP-2 Grading and Drainage Plan -Part A c. SP-3 Landscape/Lighting Plan -Part A d. SP-4 Grading, Drainage and Landscape -Part B e. SP-5 Details and Calculations f. 1 Floor Plan g. 2 Building Elevations In addition, we will be submitting applications to the Suffolk County Health Department for the new Sanitary System and to the New York State Department of Transportation for the new curb cut along the Main Road (Route 25). ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 ;631) 734-6405 FAR (631) 734-6407 If we can answer any questions, please contact us at anytime. Sincerely, Samu Is and S elman Architects ancy elman, RA cc: Constantine Kontokosta Michael Kontokosta ' ~ R CKER ~ Archaeology Services, Inc. 2rAC.t'ia9 t/ie ~ootrtepr o~ tiFe~acertonr ~ REPORTS OF INVESTIGATIONS ' Phase I Archaeolov~~cal Investigation for the Proposed Jemco Winen~ ' Greenport, Town o~ Southold, Su{~o~k Count, New York i ' November 2010 ?.Cll JA~~ ' Prepared for: Jemco React Assocaites, LLC, Greenport, New York ' Prepared by: j' A~fi-ed G. Cammisa, M.A./RPA Felicia Cammisa, Alexander Padilla ' Report ' 689 TRACKER ARCHAEOLOGY SERVICES, INC. MONROE, NY 10950. (845) 783-4082 ' NORTH BABYLON, NY 11703. (631) 321-1380 I 1 ' MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ' PR#. none known ' Involved agencies: i Town of Southold P ase. Phase IA & IB ' Location: Greenport Town of Southold Suffolk County Survey Area: Length: about 200 linear feet (61 meters) north-south ' Width: about 450 feet (137 m) east-west. Acres Surveyed: 2 acres (8 hectares) PLUS Linear feet: 1650 north-south I' Greenport, NY i' Survey overview: ST no. & interval: 53 ST's at 50ff (15m) intervals. Size of freshly plowed area: na ' Surface survey transect interval: na ul s' No prehistoric or historic remains. , RPaulis of Architectural Survev: No. Of buildings/structures/cemeteries in project area: none No. Of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area: none No. Of previously determined NR listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: none No. Of identified eligible buildings/structureslcemeteries/districts: rrone ' uthors. Alfred G. Cammisa, M.A./RPA Felicia Cammisa, B.A. ' Alexander Padilla, B.A. Date of Report: t Report completed November, 2010 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................1 Environment ...............................................................................................................................................1-2 Prehistoric Potential ...................................................................................................................................2-3 Historic Potential ........................................................................................................................................3-5 ' Field Mefhods ...............................................................................................................................................5 ' Field Results .................................................................................................................................................5 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................................5 Bibliography ...............................................................................................................................................8-7 Appendix 1: Figures and Photographs Appendix 2: Shovel Test Notes I~' Appendix 3: Table of Map Documented Structures ' LIST OF FlGURES Figure 1 Portion of the Greenport, New York USGS. ' Figure 2 Location of shovel tests on the project area. Figure 3 Portion of the 1797 township survey. Figure 4 Portion of the 1836 Colton map. ' Figure 5 Portion of the 1858 Chace map. Figure 6 Portion of the 1896 Hyde atlas. Figure 7 Portion of the 1904 USGS. Figure 8 Portion of the Couniy Soil Survey. LIST OF PHOTOS Photo 1 Looking NW from ST 1. Photo 2 Looking NE from ST 30. Photo 3 Looking SE from ST 31. t Photo 4 Looking north from ST 53. ' INTRODUCTION ' Between October 23 and November 3, 2010, TRACKER-Archaeology Services, Inc. conducted a Phase IA documentary study and a Phase IB archaeological survey for the proposed Jemco Winery in ' Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The purpose of the Phase IA documentary study was to determine the prehistoric and historic potential for the recovery of archaeological remains. The Phase IA was implemented by a review of past and current ' environmental data, archaeological site files, other amhival literature, maps, and documents. The prehistoric and historic site file search was conducted utilizing the resources of the New York State Historic Preservation Office in Waterford, New York. Various historic and/or archaeological web sites may have been visited to review any pertinent site information. The purpose of the Phase IB field survey was to provide physical evidence for the presence or absence ' of prehistoric or historic sites on the property. This was accomplished through subsurface testing and ground surface reconnaissance. ' The project area consists of approximately 2 acres plus 1650 linear feet for a proposed winery and driveway access, from a larger vineyard property with wetlands and a seffiack. The property is bordered to the north by the Long Island Sound, to the south by Main Road (NYS Rt. 25), and to the remaining ' sides by private or public properties. The study was conducted by TRACKER-Archaeology Services, Inc. of Monroe, New York. Prehistoric and historic research was conducted by Alfred Cammisa, M.A. Field investigations were conducted by field ' director Alexander Padilla, B.A. Report preparation was by Alfred Cammisa, Felicia Cammisa, B.A. and Alexander Padilla, B.A. ' The work was performed for Jemco Realty AssocaRes, LLC, Greenport, New York. ENVIRONMENT Geoloav The projed area is located in the southeast portion of New York State in the northeastern part of Suffolk County. This portion of New York lies in the Atlantic Coastal Plains Physiographic Province. The coastal plain slopes gently eastward and is actually a strip of recently emerged sea Gottom. The soils in this region consist largely of sand, day and marl (a mixture of clay, finely fragmented shell and caldte). This ' region of Suffolk County, on Long Island's North Fork, lies on the Harbor Hill Moraine. The moraine extends from Rhode Island, through Plum, Great Gull and Fishers Islands and then from Orient Point to Brooklyn, Staten Island (south and east shores), northern New Jersey and terminates in Pennsylvania. It has been heavily eroded by the Long Island Sound as far west as Port Jefferson. A glacial meltwater ' channel had once separated Orient Point from the rest of the north fork (Schuberth 1968: cover map, 9, 184-186; Van Diver 1985: 70; Sirkin 1995:142, 149-150). ' Soils and Toooaraohv Soils on the project area consist of: 1 ' Name Soii Horizon Color Texture Slope Drainage Landform Depth In(cm) inclusion Haven O 3.5-1.5in leaves Lo 0-2 & 2-6 well outwash ' (9-3cm) plains 0 1.5-0 (-0) organic A 0-3 (-8) 10YR4/2 B 3-10 (-25) 7.5YR4/4 8210-19 7.SYR5/6 (-48) ' Plymouth A=0-4in(0-10 10YR3/2 LoSa 3-8 well moraines & 10YR5/4 outwash B=4-10 (-26) 10YR5/8 plains B=10-17 (-43) ' (Warner 1975: map #5, inset map #3; pgs. 71-72, 77-78). Elevations on the property range approximately from 15-30 feet above mean sea level. The project area is located on the north fork, a peninsula. Hydrology ' The property is adjacent to the Long Island Sound and the project area is about 700 feet south of the Sound. ' Vegetation The predominant forest community inhabiting the Coastal Plain in this vicinity (Cape Cod to the Carolinas) was the Northern Pine-Oak Forest. These forests are maintained largely by the effects of frequent fires. Were it not for the fires which the pine species have adapted to, these forests would slowly change to ' Mesic, dominated by oak, hickory and red maple. Northern Pine-Oak Forests fall within the larger Xeric Forest category. Xeric forests occur on sandy or otherwise poor soils that are overly dry. All coastal plains of eastern North America are Xeric. They generally have lower species diversity than bottomland forests ' (Kricher 1988:16-17, 65-66). The reason the forest soils and surfaces are so dry in this moist region is due to the excessive drainage of overly sandy soils on the Coastal Plain. At the time of the Phase IB archaeological investigations, the project area for the proposed winery ' consisted of an open grass pasture. The project corridor (proposed road access) consisted of grass between an active vineyard. ' PREHISTORIC POTENTIAL ' A prehistoric site file search was conducted at the New York State Historic Preservation Office (NYSHPO). The search included a 1 mile radius around the study area. The following sites were recorded: 2 1 I' NYSM Sites NYSHPO Sites Distance from Site Description APE ft(m) ' 10310.001294 530 (161) Peconic Landing #1: about 760 lithics with ' bifaces. cores, primary & secondary flakes 10310.001295 1412 (430) Peconic Landing #2: Over 160 lithics w/ primary 8 secondary I' flakes ~ 4885 4060 (1238) ACP: village, shell midden ' A Paleoindian point was recovered in this vicinity (Stone nd:map). ' In addition.. Indian trails were reported in the vicinity of the project area connecting the tidal creeks along the southern and northern portions of the north fork, one appearing along, or near, Route 25 and 48. Although the foot trails were reported during early historic times, they undoubtedly existed prehistorically. Assessing the known environmental and prehistoric data.. we can summarize the following: -The property is adjacent to the Long Island Sound and the project area is about 700 feet south of the Sound. -The project area is comprised of level to moderately sloped terrain with well drained soils. -The project parcel is located on a peninsula. Previous archaeological investigations have shown these areas as more desirable for prehistoric occupation (Cammisa 1996). -Prehistoric sites are near the study area. ' -Indian trails were located in the vicinity. ' In our opinion, the study area has a higher than average potential for the recovery of archaeological remains. The type of site encountered could be a small processing/procurement site. ' HISTORIC POTENTIAL Contact Period (Seventeenth Century) At the time of European Contact and settlement. the study area was likely occupied by the Mantoobaugs. ' These were probably branches or villages of the large Corchaug tribe. (Stone nd:map; Stone-Levine 198:161). 1 3 1 ' The previously mentioned Indian trails were reported along Routes 25 and 48, connecting tidal creeks along the southern and northern porfions of the north fork. ' It may have been Town policy to keep the Indians grouped in the western portion of the Town which was considered wilderness at this time. In 1664 it was voted that the Indians could plant in Hogs Neck if they had sufficient fencing (Anonymous 1982:8). j=~ghteenth Century Indian planting fields & wigwams were located in the Greenport area at this time (Stone nd:map). ' Oyster Ponds, now called Orient, was connected with the rest of the Town by a low, sandy beach which was, at times, covered by water. This tract was called Poquatuck by the Indians which means tidal river, ' cove, or creek (Thompson 1918:385, Tooker 1962:195). Previous to the American Revolution, There was a whart near Stirling Creek where sloops from West India landed with rum and molasses. During the Revolutionary Period, there were 6 houses in the village of ' Greenport, 5 of which were along Stirling Street (Bayles 1962:379). The 1797 Town of Southold survey depicts Inlet Pond and Routes 25 and 48. No structures are on or ' adjacent to the project area (Figure 3). Nineteenth Century The territory upon which Greenport was built was sold by the heirs of Captain John Webb as auction to 3 neighbors in 1820. Greenport was founded about 1827. Main Street was laid out during this same year, as well as the first set of marine railways. The first store was constructed by 1828, the first school house built in 1832, and the name of Greenport adopted in 1834 (Pelletruea 1982:26). The 1836 Colton map shows a structure along Main Road on, adjacent, or nearby the project area. Stirling Basin inlet is depicted north of Main (North) Road (Figure 4). ' The 1858 Chace. map shows 1 or 2 structures adjacent to, or nearby, the project area (Figure 5). The 1896 Hyde atlas depicts structures on the property, possibly adjacent to the project corridor (Figure 6). II,' Twentieth Century The 1904 USGS shows a structure adjacent to the project corridor (Figure 7). ' In the late Nineteenth Century, the Town farming became highly specialized in areas such as potatoes, cauliflower, brussels sprouts, peas, beans, and the like (Bailey 1949:162). An historic site file search was conducted at the New York State Historic Preservation Office (NYSHPO). ' The search included a 1 mile radius around the study area. The following sites were recorded: -No sites were recorded. ' Assessing the known environmental and historical data, we can summarize the following: ' -The property is adjacent to the Long island Sound and the project area is about 700 feet south of the Sound. -The project area is comprised of level to moderately sloped terrain with well drained soils. 1 4 1 ' -Indian trails were located in the vicinity. Indian wigwams and planting fields were in the vicinity. ' -An historic MDS was possibly adjacent to the project area. In our opinion, the study area has a higher than average potential for the recovery of historic Euro- American sites and a moderate potential for native American historic sites. ' FlELD METHODS ' Walkover Exposed ground surfaces were walked over at approximately 3 to 5 meter intervals to observe for artifacts. Covered ground terrain was also reconnoitered at 15 meter intervals for any above ground features, such as berms, depressions, or rock configurations which might be evidence of a prehistoric or 1 historic site. Photographs were taken of the study area. Shovel Tests ' Shovel tests were to be conducted between 15 meter intervals across the project area. Each shovel test measured about 30 to 40 cm. in diameter and was dug into the underlying B horizon (subsoil) 10 to 20 cm. or more when possible. All soils were screened through 1/4 inch wire mesh and observed for artifacts. Each shovel test was flagged in the field. Any positive shovel tests were doubled flagged. All shovel tests and any archaeological finds were mapped on the project area map at this time. Soil stratigraphy was recorded according to texture and color Soil color was matched against the Munselt color chart for soils. Notes were transcribed on pre-printed field forms and in a notebook. ' FlELD RESULTS Field testing of the project area included the excavaTion of 53 shovel tests (STs) across the project area. ~i No prehistoric artifacts or features were encountered. No historic artifacts or features were encountered. Stratigraphy across the project area included the following: -O horizon - 0 to 33 cm. thick of forest root mat, leaf litter, and humus. ' -A horizon - 0 to 50 cm. thick of 10YR4/3, brown loamy sand. -B horizon - 10 to 20 cm. dug into of 10YR5/8 yellow brown loamy sand . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ' The Phase IA had determined the study area had a higher than average potential for the recovery of prehistoric sites. The property had a higher than average to moderate potential for historic sites. The Phase IB resulted in the excavation of 53 ST's. No prehistoric artifacts or features were encountered. No historic artifacts or features were encountered. No further work is recommended. 5 t BIBLIOGRAPHY Bailey, Paul 1949 Long Island: The Story of Two Great Counties, Nassau and Suffolk. Volume 1. Lewis Historical Publishing Company, New York. ' 1 Bayles, Richard 1962 Historical and Descriptive Sketches of Suffolk County. Empire State Historical Publishing ' Company XVIII. Cammisa, Alfred G. ' 1996 Phase IB Arohaeobgical Survey and Phase ll Intensive Testing of the Pellicano Site for the Proposed Bayview DeveMpment Bayview, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York. TRACKER-Archaeology Services. Ms. on file witli NYSHPO. Kricher, John C. and Gordon Morison 1988 The Peterson Field Guide Series: Eastern Forests of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. ' Levine, Gaynell, editor 1978 Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Volume 2: The Coastal Arohaeokxly I, , Reader. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Pelletreau, William 1982 Southold, in History of Suffolk County, 1683-1883. Suffolk County Tricentennial Commission. ' W.W. Munsell and Company. Schuberth, Christopher J. ' 1968 The Geology of New York City and Environs. New York: Natural History Press. Sirkin, Les 1995 Eastern Long Island Geology with Field Trips. Book and Tackle Shop, RI. ' , Stone-Levine, Gaynell 1980 Language and Lore of the Long Island Indians. Readings in Long Island Archaeology and ' Ethnohistory. Suffolk Couni Archaeological Association. Stone, Gaynell ' , 1993 Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory: Volume 3, The History and Archaeology of the Montauk. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Thompson, Benjamin Franklin ' 1918 History of tong Island. Volume 2. Ira J. Friedman, Inc., New York. Tooker, William Wallace 1962 The Indian Plaoe Names on Long Island and islands adjacent, with their probable significatrons. Ira J. Friedman, New York. ' Van Diver, Bradford B. 1985 Roadside Geology of New York. Missoula Montana: Mountain Press Publishing Company. t 6 t 1 blamer, John W.; W. E. Hana; R. J. Landry; J. P. Wulforst; J. A. Neeley; R. L. Holmes; and C. E. Rice 1975 Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation ' Service in Cooperatlon with Cornell Agricultural Experimental Station. Maos Chace, Jay 1858 Map of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York.Philadelphia: John Douglas. Colton, J.H. 1836 Map of Long Island. J.H. Colton. ' Hyde and Company 1896 Map o/Long Island. &ooklyn, New York: Hyde & Company. ' Jensen, H.M. and J. Soren 1974 Hydrology of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. Stone, Gaynell not dated Map of Native Long Island. Long Island Culture History Lab & Museum- Suffolk County Archaeological Association. ' United State Geological Survey 1956 GreenpoR, New York quadrangle map, 7.5 minute series. I' 1904 Shelter Island, NYquadrangle map, 7.5 minute series. 1 i 7 1 11 1 APPENDIX 1 1 Q, . w Figure 1 " ~ ROCKER Portion of the Greenport, NY USGS ArcAutologyservices,Inc Z 2iacklwg aka ~feKraafrr e~f.Iafawceflori o v? O', r O i ~ ; ~ ~ \ei - i 9';~ 0 i ~ so z:~ ~ _O p i ~ i ~Q iia 9f j ~-Tan an~ ez ~ .r 1{/ / ~ a Z / ~ , / ~ p ji. o /f ~ti°~' ' o F,a.,t ?ltinon ~'~a' .lfercu~l. . 33 r' ~ ;LONG ISLAl~i ' / .(I ~ project zs i area .1 00 - Ib ul _ 1 0 .~~R~N- yy ~ [V . . F ~ ~utrll • 1 ~ _r 6 G~ Pt- Tioi~ Trinity a ~ ~ o a M: ~ TI d ..x - ~ ~ ° Gr,~k( - • ~.rasadx o - Marrs. Ih~a2h . , ~ / G • ~ C 2 A ' ~ / Sewage ~gt ~i3'@@ri~is,Tt ~ ~ a`~ DisDOSa1 ~ Rao: 1~hn ~it'!r st[. .~Pdej?. d+... lHh~~~!. I so ~ ~ r ? tin t, IIIOtI' ~ ~ . .x' ' ~ BM 0 ..{1000 2000 ~ ~ 1 ri/: ; - . p YARDS i ' ~ ~ / ~ • ~ ht C 200 1 72° 22' 0.00" W 072° 22' 0.00" W 072° 21' 0.00" W 072° 21' 0.00" W 072° 20' 0.00" W I 1 O D _ 5 _ ~\I SOUND x z a o ~ o~ -1 1n ' zz ;F\ Ao I m~ m~ I N27'33~W >z\ ~o ii°~ 1 ~ I ~ 548.67 ' z ~ GEER FENG~NG - N2T4T30"W ~ Of _ Q W fSP a _ I _ c z a I a O ~ I ~/y/ ~ - ~ _ ~ _ - Exisnxa uKN .L ~ ` _ _ D Q KONTOKOSTA ~ n - _ _ _ Z N~O~ r 3 ~ ~ ~ _ - - - - E%isnxa uwx ~ v r ~ Op'W 198.28 ~ ~ ~ - - IN30.58 N. - - _ - - - _ - 33 4 BP~~EY ROAD ~ T~ 8 - o .1 ~2 DES - ~ - 9~Ym_ a - - ~ - = 6 - - :5 _ - - _ - 8 9 _ _ . 3 - - 6 7 _ - - t a - _ - ~ - - 4. 5 - _ .~p ~s 37 ~ ~ h a h _ _ 9 ~ gnvEwav-_ _ - _ _ ' 4 38 N - - _ - _ - - 6 7 ~ - . 6w` _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ - r - - - T _ - _ P OSED MAIN EN I • _ ={x13TMG - - ~ - EXIT ~~YARO - - - _ _ ~ ~ i 91% = J- i ~ ~ ~6 h - - - L j=a 1~ PROPOSED - raa F~iow . 5.53' 1 I ixa - _ ~ « s I ~ OP~~NG~ 45an° 43nx% - 42 ~ ~ n . ' ~ ~ ~r~ _ _ ykTd R-pIR4E w ~ I PROJECT NAME: JEMCO WINERY ' FIGURE 2: LOCATION OF SHOVEL TESTS SCALE: 1 INCH = 150 FEET ROCKER ~ PHOTO ANGLE Archaedogy Servlc~, lnc ' • NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST 300' 225' 150' 75' 0 150' 300' `T.vcfiy r4 $i.4hpsftk//.w~ I N Figure 3 7 Town Survey of the 179 ortion ~ , e; t~..,~ ' ti r , ,~r~ r project ~ ~ ~ vicinity ! " i r ~.t:.. J'' i . , iY~ • 1u. 'n L" v 1~ i ~ . t. ~ t y ,4 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ v 1 d J~!-U i<<'t "~f 1 ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~1 w J 1 ~ r ,.I N Figure ~ . . portion of the 1$36 Colton ma J- _ . ~ o: r a project ~M~ ' vicinity 4 I ! I ¦ S• • Ii ~,~n• eft{ _ ' . ~ IJ~„~. 1 ~ ~ ~ - - , . r~ it r ~ .J r ` 1 e - ~ .g. . ~ ;f~, _ r ~ ~~s~ l ~ Y ~ I ¦ ~ ,r•,- 1111 .r - - Project • • • area f -r, ~ • V . ~ r i ~ • ~y~p ~ R • ~R~ ti A, ~ ~ • 7 ~ • ~ 111 pi ~~+111 • ~ I ~ f ~ ti i1+ i ~j f r~ry ~ S~r~ r r j r . • s ~ • • 14? i ? • ~ ~ ~j . ' ~ er~,* . ~ Q , i •i • ~ ~ ~ G 1 ~ ji 1~w.r~.rsi ~ ' ~~t ~ may' ,t11 ~ 11 `t ~ , . ~ ` ~;,rrlrgll ~ ~ y+' • • • i .t.1iMf•rhr~rr • N ' ~~gure 5 ~ e • ~~Z. w?, 185$ Chace map ~ 'i ~ Port?on of the , , _ .t t ~rr~- 1 1~ ~ ~ ~f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i= .c ~ ~ ~ project ~ • ~ • ~ ~ area 1 ~ ` • ~ ~ . ~ ~ 1 V.~....~ ~ i • ~ ~ y? , • ~ ~ •w ~C' ~ ~ !rte ^ Figure 6 " Portion of the 1896 Hyde atlas i` I ~ I t; . " ~r `~r I 1 il';li Figure~7~ r. I,II ~~,~1 N ~I~Ill~i~ r il~ e. /r j.''J'J1~ tt j l,t~ l ' r;~//'Jtfr i ¦ Portion of the 1904 USGS p - ,I; . lr~r it r '`i ,r' r r 11 f() r ill { t ~ ' r i ~ JJ C-~. ,~''rl l_. ~i M1 Jig _ °'~i'% a r fr i. ~y a_ f ~ fI I~I ~ it 6 s _ ~ r / / I V ~ err ~ Jr/ ~R ~i~~ i "+~~4. f ~ I ' ~f~ ~l~ project ur j~,J r 7r'f "r'~---- ~ area " c s ~I ill II _ "1 C, ~ ~ V ~ - ~ ~ rw' 11 ~M1\ ~ w I I ~ _ _ III j y , - ~1 Ii ? tL{rr ~d~j/ ~1 t ~G I P r,`~r II ~r Oti if r,f f ~~~r i ~ I~i 1. ~ yw . ~ ~t ~~'f ~ i~ r ii _ • \ ! ~ wNr - I }yy _ it V I I 1 1 z ? ~ y1 .ir _ i 1 ~ ~ ~~Iry Iii r h ~ ';r - ' ~ I ~ r r 'ti, J if j~ ~ 1~~4 ~ ( ~b~~~ll I I~`rF ~ ~ ~~~~I ~I 1 f t I' I I ~ r~J~~>~~ i ~ 1 I ~ ff~ 1 i 'S7~? i~ ~ ~I / tr f, r ~ -rte - i y ~ /h ~ 1 I~ ~ r,, ' ~ PIB t ~ .c ,4 yG~ N~N~1~~~~ zy f mss,: ~ project ieg Ha~ 145 , ~ area t' 6.. I' et 5) 2 0 FEET II 4 OOQ•f00T GRID TICKS ~ Figure 8 ~w Portion of the County Soil Survey ' ei, sheet RdA a. k ` s °s rp ' d S i>, t project H ~ ; r r + area ~ ~yt a a-: ~ ~~3 t ~ I B ~ifi * ~ ~ " ~ ~ rr" ~ ~ r `n?.. ` I ~a. S F• ~ . , ~ ~ Yk s vMX ~ Hsu ~~y i~`~~,i,;_c~J. x w , < Y Ha-}.9 ~ ~ f ` ~ M~ ` srs°. ~ ~ . , . ~ rA tyt.. ~1...? ~ ~ 'fib ti ~ ~ x A , , ; ~ i A 2: w t II;1 ~ r HaB ~ ~-r!? o ~ s ~ ~ T Mr ~ i I ~ Mme:.. ~{~y d; ~ ~,p ~ r ! . 5X/3 x 3w # t~ ~ M1N E . ~ j 3a.`°~~ , ' ~ ~'~tr t i z:aku a... ~rwr+' 3 ~t~ ~r h r Photo 1 ~~~~s~ Looking NW from ST 1 dsit?i ~r~~~I~G1~Iw4.;W h~~ +IIF~~r~l~°~py~ hey 5~ _ i 1 r# , 1 1 _ s~q = Y ~ { ~ 1 . rl4;~n,~,.,,'' c ! Photo 2 cooking NE from ST 3D x}~.- - SM1F Str" , [r--. , .t.' ~ d iy " A ,xl"` ~ ~ .rrs t ~ "ix ~rtr fit. r„t~ 1 , ~ ~ ~ e„#~ 'fT ':.i rti.~r s ~ ~~qs! ~}r, J.~~~an y; t. d. t• y r r* n A_ ..r A IrN`r / ~ i t ~ ~fi e _ ? , a t s p*~t' ~`y?~t _ ~ Y ~ ~ i,~,~ 4af~ - 1 'F 3 S1'y ~ ~ A" rte" ~ ~ jl.'~` ~ F j yy K ~ ~t + ~ ~ ~ r i;~'~~~,ye - f 1~tY~~~Y ~ Jkc~fb~'~'", *Y+Y~l"~'k .t~~A~ i`.t ~ ` s t ^,t,~'+r t~p1! ~st~~Y ~1D f,t ajy 4r a..~ x + dal ~r y~f... r R+" 'I~r ~ a r tr 1'~'i~dfi ti'i~9 i r ~ ~ , w .>'•'i, -,>1 tixr ~ . * a y rtr rr r. ` s Ott E ti` :yP~t s r ~ ~~i;; , ~ ~ r p ivy ~a.- .~t 'itr~~~ ~ M s t.I 1~"- ~ tft~y{~ylt ~ pr`trr~'~.Y''~`~ ~ y g'4'! . ~,Al ~ ptf ~r ~L' F+nC•"!t+`,?!"~n..Ta " ` ` r qy t,Tr~y ,,w x.' 3 .t .ono ~ ~ ~5 ~ -~w 5~ from 513 - 1 ' Photo 4 Looking north from ST 53 1 1 ~ " K' 1 i?c .,y ~ i ' „'--:,o+. T Y ~ ~ .f.~ '~''p.$L ~ id f ~r ,-f ~ ~ ~ 1, ~ ~a.*1s "'~''+es~ _ 'Yk^ ~ M ~ ' ~-,ate} .,tcb ~ e '~.~t ,~~i~~ •~`'t! ~ yy~ i >.,(~f ~,,y/pr .~Ar ~ A~"~°*+ *,5'M +4~a,_•.71a~ rt ` es 4 ~ t i I t [ 9%IS~A~.`n'~9~`~t {r~ ~ Ls*.. ~ s Y.~`-.~ F '•~C-BFI _ ~ :J, F;3Y+1 U ~ +~'~7'~~j ~'~x :k Y ~ 4. SKI ~ .5 ~ L f~ , , 1 1 ' APPENDIX 2 1 1 t ' Shovel Tests ' STP Lv Deoth(cm1 Texture Color Hor. Comments 1 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-21 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 21-34 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ICI' 2 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-27 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 27-39 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 3 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 2-23 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 23-35 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 4 1 0-3 rootmatleaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 3-20 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 20-33 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM I' 5 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-21 LoSa 10YR3/3 A NCM 3 21-34 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 6 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-22 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 22-35 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 7 1 0-2 rootmat,leave,humus A/O NCM 2 2-20 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM I' 3 20-31 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 8 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-19 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM t 3 19-30 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 9 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 3-18 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 18-30 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 10 1 0-8 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 815 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 15-30 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 11 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-28 LoSa 10YR4/3 A clam shell 3 28-41 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 12 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-26 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 26-38 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 13 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-22 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM I' 3 22-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 14 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 2-22 LoSa 10YR3/2 A NCM 3 22-41 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 15 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-24 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 24-35 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM t 16 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-24 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 24-35 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 17 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 3-20 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 20-35 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 18 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 3-18 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 18-30 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 19 1 0-2 rootmatleaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 2-17 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 17-33 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 20 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-23 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 23-37 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 21 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-22 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM , 3 22-39 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 22 1 0-2 rootmat,leave,humus A/O NCM 2 2-26 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 26-39 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 23 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 3-28 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 28-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 24 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 2-19 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 19-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 25 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM t 2 3-25 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 25-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 26 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-27 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 27-43 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 27 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-22 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM , ' 3 22-44 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 28 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-29 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 29-43 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 29 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-26 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 26-45 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 30 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 5-30 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 30-45 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 31 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-29 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 29-43 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 32 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 5-33 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 33-44 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 33 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 5-27 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 27-39 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 34 1 0-5 rootmatleaves,humus A/O NCM 2 5-25 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 25-37 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 35 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-23 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 23-35 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 36 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-28 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 28-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 37 1 0-4 rootmat,leave,humus A/O NCM ' 2 4-32 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 32-45 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 38 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 4-25 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 25-45 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 39 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 5-27 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 27-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 40 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-18 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 18-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 1 1 1 41 1 0-6 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 6-24 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 24-37 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 42 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-26 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 26-39 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 43 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 5-26 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 26-42 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 44 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 4-27 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 27-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 45 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 4-31 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 31-45 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 46 1 0-3 rootmai,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 3-28 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 28-45 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 47 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 1 2 3-26 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 26-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 48 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 5-25 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 25-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 49 1 0-2 rootmatleaves,humus A/O NCM 2 2-31 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 31-43 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 50 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 2-30 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 30-41 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 51 1 0-6 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM ' 2 6-28 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 28-40 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 52 1 0-4 rootmat,leave,humus A/O NCM t 2 4-24 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 24-32 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM ' 53 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 5-29 LoSa 10YR4/3 A NCM ' 3 29-43 LoSa 10YR5/8 B NCM 1 Table of Map Documented Structures 1 ' LOCATION MAP ON OR OWNER ECO-NICHE COMMENT ADJACENT TO PROJECT ' AREA north side of 1797 no na frontier hamlet Fig. 3 Main Rd (North ' Rd), east of Inlet Pond & north of Stirling ' Basin same as above 1836 adjacent or na agricultural Fig. 4 nearby north side of 1858 adjacent na agricultural Fig. 5 Main Rd (North ' Rd), east of Sound Rd. ' same as above 1896 adjacent na agricultural Fig. 6 same as above 1904 adjacent na rural Fig. 7 1 1 1 1 v~ Y a t ~r a » #c ' ~ i~ ~ 5r 4 yam. ~ ; ~ ~ ~,'x'~ r a S y r G 3 ~ i1 F .T r. ~ :,rrt~ 1j4j ..iw 6~,. i~q~yy~'~a•~ //''/f//++~' . . . `r,~. } ~ ^ ~`"t!. jtie.l ~ ",y. '+7.14 ~ ~ a r 'd l ~ t y f aZ• f v / '~*a - _ ,=~~'t~~~ ,may. , ~ o~ .f:., f ~ A G~ Y ' `i k SITE PLAN STATI3S REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED NEW WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE PROJECT NAME: '~i m f d zoNEl:_zoNaz:J zoNES:_ LOCATION: HAMLET: SCTM# 1000 - ~JS- ~ - OWNER NAME: 7EL# APPLICANT NAME: TEL# AGENT NAME: ~ w ~ TEL#(~)= PAOJECTDESCRIF770N: ( (f~ tr EXISTING USE: 6 PROPOSED USE: I DATE BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: S!P RE U1RED R N ZBA APPEAL REQUIl2ED Y OR PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) / K NOTES: INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: APPLICATION RECEIVED DATE: ! J APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: / PAYMENT RECEIVED: y~ AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ _ NEW SP: $500./ACRE &.IOfSF, AMENDED SK: $25~~ ~ 0/SFSAGRIC SP: FLAT $500 ~ P~ W~~s I '0 FEE AMOUNT .oo x ° ~ }~($.1 o~x ~ sF=$ y ) `/off NEW APPLICATION WORK SESSION (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT), PB ACCEPTED Y OR N s~l Bi APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REVffiW) {,J e 7 riip,' l l BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEEETING 100-254B3 (WITHIN 30 DAYS) c~ I / NOTES: i' REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED : / / NOTES: REFERRED AG NCIES: (WI1TI MAPS= /P) - STZBA~,,STBD ,STGPH 7H_~STBT STE SCDHS DEC_,USn~ORPS_,Nl'SDOT_,SCWA SCPD CDPW ,LWRP HPSPONSES NO 5 LEAD AGENCY: mspa_,ox>ma: R15VIRW:pAR71 ,PARTI_,PAR73_,SHORTEAF_,LONGEAF / NOTESr _ - - ACTION TYPE: COORDINATED: UNCOORDINATED:- (TYPE1: TYPE2:-UNLISTED: REFERRED TO:5RHA' 80 STCTB_,JH,~STBT STE SCDHS~C.NYSDEO_,USACORPS_,NYSDOT .SCW1~_,SCPD_,SCDPW_ SEQRA DETERMINATION :NEG DEC Y OR N, T~ APPROVALS REQUIRED: REFERRED DATE NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: -J J LWRP COORDINATOR: ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: 0 L; FIRE COMMISSIONERS; TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: - . DEP.OF TRANSPORTATION :DOT ,DPW , TOS_ SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING : ~j' j -l-f- SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH: PERMIT _ OP710NAL APPROVALS: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEAL# -r-/- BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: ( NYS DEC WETLANDS/TIDAUSPDES J I l l PLANNING BOARD DECISIONS: CONDITIONAL FINAL/ / DENIED: APPROVEp: ' FINAL: / / NOTES ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: / FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT TOWN ENG GENERAL NOTES: 10/4/2005 Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Site Plan for 67 Steps Winery Preparers Kristy Wineer, Senior Planner Date: January 31, 2011 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: 67 Steps Vineyazds SCTMN#: 1000-32-1-24 Street Location: 825 NYS Rt. 25 Hamlet: Greenport Type of Site Plan: New Property Owner: Jemco Realty Assoc. Applicant: Same Representative: Nancy Steelman R.A. Site Plan Prepared By: Same Date of Map: April 14, 2010 Date of Submission to Planning Board: April 14, 2010 Lot size: 60 acres Building size area: 8,419sq. ft Zoning District: R-80 Parking required: 42 @ 1/per 200sf Parking proposed: 42 (plus 96 overflow spaces total 138) Landscaping proposed: 20 acres aze planted vines II. Site Analysis: This 60 acre site has an existing vineyard located between the Shady lady and Peconic landing properties located on the north side of Route 25, Greenport. The site extends to the L.I. Sound whereas an 8,419 sf building for the purposes of a retail winery is proposed to have approximately a 500' foot setback from the 100' foot bluff setback line. The total GFA of the building is 8,419 sf with the following breakdown: First floor: 3,349 sf Basement: 3,349 sf 2 mezzanine azeas: West: 823 sf East: 898 sf Site Plan Review for 67 Steps Page 2 January 31, 20l 1 Parking: 138 parking stalls with the following breakdown: Pazking has been provided based on the 8,419 sf /200sf = 42 parking stalls 2 of which aze ADA compliant stalls closest to the building (west side). In addition, 96 spaces aze provided for overflow east of the bldg in two areas: 36 spaces (gravel azea) 60 spaces (lawn area) SEQR Classification -Unlisted Coordinated Review Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agenry, maked a determination ofnon-significance and granted a Negative Declaration on September 14, 2010. III. Status: The below information was sent to the applicant on November 9, 2010 and the following is the information submitted is for the consideration of the Boazd: 1. As you are awaze, the proposed development area is well over an acre in size and will require a SPEDES Permit and submission of a MS4 SWPP Acceptance Form to the Town of Southold for review. As such, your runoff coefficients provided will need to be _ revised to include oil and stone parking areas and other solid surfaces as a coefficient of one, not 90%. In addition, all gravel driveway areas need to be included in the drainage calculations using arun-off coefficient of 60%. It is my understanding that your Engineer has discussed this matter with the Town Engineer and it was determined that any recommended practice may be acceptable to meet this requirement e.g. French or trench drain, leaching pools or a drainage Swale. The same storm water system shall be required behind the storage tanks to rechazge the excess storm water into the ground. Said requirements aze requested by the Planning Board to satisfy SPEDES &MS4 requirements and Chapter 236 on storm water management in the Southold Town Code: A. Staff has been coordinating with the Town Engineer for comment regazding the applicant's submission regazding the above requested information and proposed drainage Swale and his comments are provided below: 1. A swale needs to be at least 18" deep, if not deeper. 2. A strip of stone or cross section of gravel at the bottom of the Swale would increase its drainage capability significantly. 3. Another option would be to propose landscape planting such as wild flower or other native grasses to slow down runoff. This will give storm water time to recharge within the Swale areas. 4. The Swale detail needs additional information to be more comprehensive. The detail should be amended and noted in a manner that will provide a cross section that can be easily maintained. Site Plan Review for 67 Steys Paee~ January 31, 2011 B. SPDES permit with amended drawings and detail were submitted for review and the proposed locations of rock drain /check dams appear to be satisfactory. 2. It was noted that there does exist vegetation along the east property line. To help preserve and screen the winery use from the adjacent residential use, the Planning Board will require a 25' natural buffer. The addition of cedars from locations that may need to be removed from the development area may be transplanted to this area. Please provide a description on the site plan as noted above. A. The site plan indicates a 25' natural buffer along the east property line. 3. Although metal halide light fixtures aze proposed, lighting seems to comply with the new code but to be sure, please submit a color rating so that staff can match it with the code requirement. Also as discussed, lighting for the proposed sign will need to be revised to be full cut-off from the sky face down-lights. A. Sign lighting has been modified to face down and a color rating has been provided that appeazs to be satisfactory. 4. Provide at minimum of one hydrant with a 1500gpm be installed at a location neaz the proposed building approved by the Fire District. Also, provide a notation that "all roadways to the site remain free and clear access". A. This has been addressed and noted on the site plan. 5. In regard to the DOT recommendation for a pedestrian path along the front (south) of the site and for cross access, the Planning Boazd will not require development of the path or access into the adjacent residential areas. However, the applicant shall comply with the remaining DOT comments and submit their approved permit prior to approval from the Planning Boazd. A. Conceptually, the DOT approves the project and the applicant has submitted their last round of comments. It should be noted that the DOT Maintains their recommendation to provide a pedestrian sidewalk and future cross access. 6. To preserve the scenic quality of the New York State Scenic Byway, provide a notation on the plan stating that "no structures or signs within 75' of Rt. 25, except as shown on the approved site plan". A. Noted on the plan. 7. Beach access should be located to accommodate any future development and minimize the potential for erosion of the parcel. Show one area for future beach access and fence along the bluff as discussed. A. Noted on the plan. 8. Provide potential fall zones for the wind turbine shown on the plan, and show the pazking outside the fall zone area. A. Fall zones are noted and the pazking area has been reconfigured . 9. The Boazd will require that an archeological survey Phase 1 to be conducted within the building and pazking azeas for any ground disturbance to preserve historic resources of the Town of Southold prior to a site plan being approved. A. Phase 1 survey has been completed and no further work was recommended. IV. Recommendation: After review of the site plan submitted on January 3, 2011, staff supports the Planning Boazd decision to not require a pedestrian path or future cross access on the basis that this is an agricultural use and should the use change, site plan review would be required and these items could be reconsidered and required by the Planning Board. It would appear that the applicants have addressed all the comments from the November 9, 2010 letter. In addition the applicants have satisfied the concerns of the Town Engineer with regard to drainage therefore, it is the Staff recommendation to approve the project as submitted. Upon receipt of their DOT approval, the matter could be scheduled for a decision at the next available public hearing. Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Site Plan for 67 Steps Winery Preparer. Kristy W inser, Senior Planner Date: November 1, 2010 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: 67 Steps Vineyards SCTMN#: 1000-32-I-24 Street Location: 825 NYS Rt. 25 Hamlet: Greenport Type of Site Plan: New Property Owner: Jemco Realty Assoc. Applicant: Same Representative: Nancy Steelman R.A. Site Plan Prepared By: Same Date of Map: April 14, 2010 Date of Submission to Planning Board: April 14, 2010 Lot size: 60 acres Building size area: 8,419sq. ft Zoning District: R-80 Parking required: 42 @ I/per 200sf Parking proposed: 42 (plus 96 overFlow spaces total 138) Landscaping proposed: 20 acres are planted vines II. Site Analysis: This 60 acre site has an existing vineyard located between the Shady lady and Peconic landing properties located on the north side of Route 25, Greenport. The site extends to the L.1. Sound whereas an 8,419 sf building for the purposes of a retail winery is proposed to have approximately a 500' foot setback from the 100' foot bluff setback line. The total GFA of the building is 8,419 sf with the following breakdown: First floor: 3,349 sf Basement: 3,349 sf 2 mezzanine areas: West: 823 sf East: 898 sf Parking: 138 parking stalls with the following breakdown: Parking has been provided based on the 8,419 sf/200sf = 42 parking stalls 2 of which are ADA compliant stalls closest to the building (west side). In addition, 96 spaces for overflow east of the bldg in two areas: 36 spaces (gravel area) & additional lawn area for 60 spaces Site Plan for 67 Steas Vineyards Pace 2 November 1.2010 SEQR Classification -Unlisted Coordinated review, Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, makes a determination ofnon-significance and granted a Negative Declaration oo September 14, 2010. III: Overview of Site visit conducted on 10/22/10: ? Verified the location and footprint for the building proposed in relation to overall site. ? Reviewed existing buffers along east and west of site. ? Discussed additional screening vs. establishing non-disturbance buffers. ? Identified possible fall zone concerns with respect to the proposed Wind Turbine. ? Discussed a scenic conservation easement along the front property line and 100 foot setback from the bluff. ? Discussed designing a common pedestrian beach access. IV. Statf Recommendations: 1. After reviewing the site plan in accordance with existing site conditions it would appear that there is ample vegetation along the west property line in place, as well as existing rows of vines and at a distance of 700+ feet to minimize potential conflicts between the residences to the future agricultural/winery use. 2. Although existing site conditions present no visual intrusion to the abutting residential dwellings to the east, the proposed parking areas will be in closer proximity than the for the west and there are no rows of vines beyond the parking areas. k is recommended that the Board establish anon-disturbance buffer of 100' feet along the east property line to help preserve and maintain this buffer. 3. It is recommend that the applicant provide fall zones on the plan. If necessary, it is recommended fox the applicant to amend the overflow parking area closest to the proposed wind turbine accordingly as there is ample parking provided. 4. [t is recommend that a 75' scenic easement be required from the State Route 25 property line, north, to preserve to the scenic quality of the New York State Scenic Byway. 5. It is further recommend that the PB discuss and require one beach access over the bluff to minimize the potential for erosion. The access should be located to accommodate any future development of the parcel. Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Site Plan for 67 Steps Winery Preparer: Kristy Winee, Senior Planner Date: October 18, 2010 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: 67 Steps Vineyards SCTMN#: 1000-32-1-24 Street Location: 825 NYS Rt. 25 Hamlet: Greenport Type of Site Plan: New Property Owner: Jemco Realty Assoc. Applicant: Same Representative: Nancy Steelman R.A. Site Plan Prepared By: Same Date of Map: April 14, 2010 Date of Submission to Planning Board: April 14, 2010 Lot size: 60 acres Building size area: 8,419sq. ft Zoning District: R-80 Parking required: 42 @ 1/per 200sf Parking proposed: 42 (plus 96 overflow spaces total 138) Landscaping proposed: 20 acres are planted vines II. Site Analysis: This 60 acre site has an existing vineyard located between the Shady lady and Peconic landing properties located on the north side of Route 25, Greenport. The site extends to the L.I. Sound whereas an 8,419 sf building for the purposes of a retail winery is proposed to have approximately a 500' foot setback from the 100' foot bluff setback line. The total GFA of the building is 8,419 sf with the following breakdown: First floor: 3,349 sf Basement: 3,349 sf 2 mezzanine areas: West: 823 sf East: 898 sf Parking: 138 parking stalls with the following breakdown: Parking has been provided based on the 8,419 sf /200sf = 42 parking stalls 2 of which are ADA compliant stalls closest to the building (west side). In addition, 96 spaces for overflow east of the bldg in two areas: 36 spaces (gravel area) & additional lawn area for 60 spaces Site Plan for 67 Steps Vineyards Paste 2 October 18. 2010 SEAR Classification -Unlisted Coordinated review Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review. Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration on September 14, 2010. III• Comments from Other Astencies with Staff Recommendations: SCPC, 6/1/10 Local determination but provided comments regarding the Top of Bluff & Hazard erosion Management Line for consideration; however, the development is well beyond 700 feet from their recommended setbacks of 100+feet. They suggest to also requiring a scenic and conservation easement for these sensitive areas. Further public access should be prohibited. Recommendation: it is recommended that the Planning Board consider a vegetative buffer be established between the western (main) parking area and residential properties to the west and between the eastern overflow parking areas and residences to the east to minimize potential conflicts between the residences and the future agricultural/winery use. The location of the buffers should be further discussed (e.g. On the property line or against the parking areas) Require a 75' scenic easement from the State Route 25 property line, north, to preserve to the scenic quality of the New York State Scenic Byway. Require one beach access over the bluff to minimize the potential for erosion. The access should be located to accommodate any future development of the parcel. Greenport Village 7/6/10 & Public hearing 9/13/10 The Village raised traffic, safe access and screening concerns. These same concerns were raised during the Public hearing as well. Suggested adequate screening from adjacent sites with mature plantings that are protected by a maintenance and replacement covenant. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Board consider the following Proper and safe access is being reviewed concurrently with the DOT and comments will be incorporated into the approved site plan. Traffic generation was reviewed in connection with SEOR and it was determined that the potential traffic generated by the proposed winery would be low. This number was based on the use proposed. The ITE Manual is the industry standard for trip generation analysis and provides trip generation rates based on use classifications of a building. The following use classifications and associated net square footage of building area were used to calculate the estimated PM peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposed project. The total PM Peak Hour vehicle trip is equal to 11.94. Rounding up, this equals 12 vehicle trips per peak hour. Site Plan for 67 Steps Vineyards Paae 3 October 18. 2010 A landscaped buffer/beret is recommended to provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to the abutting residential dwellings. Planting type, height & spacing should be at the discretion of the Planning Board to effectively screen the activity on the lot from neighboring residences. As a min' it is recommended that the plantings consist of a double row of trees six feet in height planted at intervals of 10 feet on center. This is also discussed in connection with the LWRP review. Drainage review from Office of the Town Engineer received 8/30/10 ? Runoff coefficients need to be changed with regard to impervious surfaces (use 1 rather 90%). In addition, all gravel driveway areas need to be included using a runoff coefficient of 60%. Then all drainage talc's will need to be revised accordingly. ? Work requires a SPDES permit ? Project requires a DOT curb cut ? Facility is designed with storage tanks for rainwater used as site irrigation. Although, this is recommended for BMP's, there is an additional requirement for leaching basins behind these storage tanks in the event that tanks are full excess storm water can recharge into the ground. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Board consider accepting their Engineer comments and require the applicant to submit a SPDES permit and revise their drainage plans accordingly. NYS DOT 9/28/10 ? They recommend cross access to promote access management. ? Require the entire width of NY 25 shoulder to be reconstructed for a min' driveway width of 25-feet on either side of the driveway. ? Recommend that the site connect to the existing sidewalk east of the property. They further recommend that they propose a pedestrian path instead of a sidewalk to maintain the rural character. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Board to require the applicant to meet the recommendations of the DOT and incorporate all notations and recommendations on their next submission and submit their curb cut approval prior to approval. Greenport Fire District received 1x14/10 The District has requested one minimum hydrant with a 1500gpm, at least at the northern end of the main drive on the east side of the driveway. Further the request that No street lights or cobble stone near or on the turn about circle (this will be needed for out tower ladder to be able to make the tight turn). Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Board consider a notation that all roadways to the site remain free and clear access. It is further recommended that one minimum hydrant with a 1500gpm be installed at a location approved by the Fire District. Site Plan for 67 Steos Vineyards Paae 4 October 18. 2010 LWRP review for consistency 1x14/10 8 OPHR 8/16/10 Presented by the LWRP Coordinator Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Board consider a vegetative buffer be established between the western (main) parking area and residential properties to the west and between the eastern overflow parking areas and residences to the east to minimize potential conflicts between the residences and the future agricultural/winery use. The location of the buffers should be further discussed (e.g. On the property line or against the parking areas) It is further recommended that an archeological survey Phase 1 be conducted within the building and parking areas prior to any ground disturbance to preserve historic resources of the Town of Southold as recommend by the LWRP coordinator and OPHR. Require a 75' scenic easement from the State Route 25 property line, north, to preserve to the scenic quality of the New York State Scenic Byway. Require one beach access over the bluff to minimize the potential for erosion. The access should be located to accommodate any future development of the parcel. Trustees 6/1/10 Determined the work out of the wetland jurisdiction but stated "No disturbance 100-feet landward of the top of bluff line". ARC 8/9/10 The committee approves the project as submitted. Health Department Approved # 010.10.0003, 9/21/10 Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Site Plan for Jemco Vineyards Prepazer: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: May 17, 2010 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: Jemco Vineyards SCTMN#: 1000-32-1-24 Street Location: 825 NYS Rt. 25 Hamlet: Greenport Type of Site Plan: New Property Owner: Jemco Realty Assoc. Applicant: Same Representative: Nancy Steelman R.A. Site Plan Prepared By: Same Date of Map: April 14, 2010 Date of Submission to Planning Board: April 14, 2010 Lot size: 60 acres Building size area: 8,419sq. ft Zoning District: R-80 Parking required: 42 @ 1/per 200sf Parking proposed: 42 (2 ADA compliant & overflow) Landscaping proposed: 20 acres are planted vines II. Site Analysis: SEQR Classification -Unlisted Coordinated review This 60 acre site has an existing vineyard located between the Shady lady and Peconic landing properties located on the north side of Route 25, Greenport. The site extends to the L.I. Sound whereas an 8,419 sf building for the purposes of a retail winery is proposed to have approximately a 500' foot setback from the 100' foot bluff setback line. The break down of the footprint of the building is as follows: First floor: 3,349 sf Basement: 3,349 sf Second floor mezzanine azeas: West: 823 sf East: 898 sf Site Plan for JEMCO Pace 2 May 3.2010 Parking has been provided based on the 8,419 sf /200sf = 42 parking stalls 2 of which aze ADA compliant stalls closest to the building (west side). In addition, the applicant has provided ample parking for overflow parking as follows: 350/ azea designated = 96 spaces (east of the bldg) 36 spaces (gravel azea) and an additional lawn area for 60 spaces Also, as required the applicant has provided a loading azea located on the ramp lowering to the basement azea on the east side of the building. Last the applicant has provided road and drainage details along with elevations and site lighting that will need to be reviewed further by the appropriate Town Departments and committees. III: Permits and/or Review Required From Other Aeencies Greenport Fire District, Greenport Village, Building Inspector Certification, Drainage review from Office of the Town Engineer, LWRP review for consistency, ARC, SCPC, NYS DOT, Health Department IV: Staff Recommendations Discuss the applicant fee analysis submitted for consideration. Based on what the Code States: Flat Fee of $500 plus an additional $500 for each acre in excess of the first acre, plus .10 for each gross floor area for proposed construction: • Applicant did not include entire site of 60acres (30,000) • $500/acres- (2.4 building, parking and driveways) x $500 = 1,200 GFA x .10 (8419x..10) _ $841.90 Total = 2,542 1. Based on research, it appears that although the application fees schedule has changed, I was not able to find something similar to go by. Most fees that were calculated had development rights sold on the property and the Board consistently only counted the build able areas. 2. The most recent fees collected in connection with a site plan for a winery was for a. Prurita winery (3.7 acres whereas 21 acres sold dev rights). b. Sparkling Point -calculated based on old fee schedule (site is 12 acres) on 1.2 build out acreage plus GFA. 4. Staff recommendation is be consistent with what has been don a in the past and require payment on buildable area based on that the site is an active vineyard. It is further recommended that the fee provided is reasonable based on the breakdown for the retail winery portion of the site (roadways, parking areas, buildable area, patios ect). _ _ _ r TOW"1~1 OF SQUTHOLD PLAN~?ING OARD SITE. PLAN APPLICATIQN f SECTIt)N A: Site Plan Name and Location - - ; , p I:i i Application Date: 4 2 1 2 010 Jemco Winer ` ~ , 4 Site Flan Name: y i Snffulk County Tax A^iap #IOQO- 35 - of - 24 Other SCTM #s: Street Address: 825 Main Rd_._._(ROUte_25) Hamlet: Greenport - Distance to neazest intersection: aril-®y gd Type of Site Plan; X New _ Amended Residential If Amended, last approVaPdate: ! SECTIQN Bt QwnerslAaenf Contact Information Please list name, rnailin address, and. hone nxrnber or ltte~~Ple below: Property Owner Jemco Realty Associates, LLC Street P.O. Box 67 City Greenport _ State NY lip 11944 HomeTelephone 477-0600 Other 212-582-6100 - Applicant Jemco Realty Associates, LLC ~ ~ Street P.O. Box 67 ~ City Greenport State. NY lip 11944 HotneTelephane 477-0600 Other 212-582-6100 Applicant's Agent pr Representsrtivx: i ContactPersoti(s)* Nancv Steelman~Samuels &_Steelman i Street 25235 Main Rd. ~ I I City Cuteho4ue State. NY __Zip 11935 OfficeTefephone 734-6405 Other_ *Un(ess otherwise requested, correspondence-will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 1 of 2 10105/OS ~SEC1'It7N C: Site Rata Progosed construction type: x New Modification of Existing Structure _~Agricultural Change ofttse._.___--- Property total acreage or square footage: 60.3 3 ac./sq. ft. Site Plan bu9Td-out aereage or square footage: 2 .45 ac./sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sato of Developtnont Iti~hts on the property? Yes No x If yes, explain: PropertyZouingDistrict{s): R-80 _ _ ~ Building Dopartraent Notice of Disapproval Date: 04 ,i 0 5 / LL10 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes ~ No X_ Ifyes, Gaue yon subnvtted an application to khe ZBA? Yes No If yes, a#tach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which. building will. have vi~hich use. If more then ane use is prApose&per building;. indicate square footage of floorarea per use. List all existing property uses:- Vineyard List allpropasedpropertyuses:____ Vineyard and winery Other accessory uses:---- Existing totcoverage: 0 _°,~o Praposed lot coverage:,.-_•.126 Gross floor area of existing structure(s):--_~ sq. ft. Gross floor ~¢ea ofproposed structure{s): 3349 SF Parking Space Data; # ofexistiug spaces:-_ 0 # ofproposed spaces: 42 _ Loading Berth: Yes No x f A - - - Landscaping Details: q Existing landscape coverage: 100 . Proposed landsc ipe coverage: 96- % II waterfront Dsta; Is thfs property within 500" of a wetland ana? Yes x No [fyes explain; Adj aeent LI Sound 1, the undersigned, certi/fy th all the a o e info ti9n is true. Signature ofPreparr~ Date:__April 2, 201.0 Page 2 of 2 Ioiastas APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. ~ YOUR NAME: ~~1C~17 ~~`-`!k~-TY ASSOC-IA~~ LI,G~I~l~1~~~~~1~~~ (°T (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying n the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NA"PURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance - Special Exception if°other~. _ - Zp10 name the activity: 51~~ r~.+-~ _ VJ~4.~c~Y ~ 4 Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship' includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. 'Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO Complete the balance of tltis form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: _ Describe tltat relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the "Gown officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5"/0 of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); 6) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in anon-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or _ D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this :day of ~1 /,b Signature: _ Print Name:_ tL ~ APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The ouraose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: ~'~-wit ~1~~~ (Last name,~rst name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance Special Exception If "Other", 1 ~ name the activity: ~'1TC. z )?y~t/~ Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X Complete [he balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that aPPIY)~ A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-wrporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this d1y Signature: _ Print Name: Jemco Realt;~ BOX 67 ates, LLC Greenport, NY 11944 Apri12, 2010 I hereby authorize Nancy Steelman of Samuels and Steelman Architects of 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY, to act as my agent for all required permits from the Town of Southold, Suffolk County and State of New York, for my project at located at 825 Main Road, Greenport, NY 11944. SCTM#1000-35-01-24 Sincerely, ~ - l~ ~b~ JEMCO WINERY Site Plan Approval Fee Required Flat fee - $500 $500/acres - 2.4 acres (building, parking, driveways) x $500 = $1,200 Gross SF x.10 = 8419 x .10 = $841.90 or 842.00 TOTAL: $2542 ~ ~ Q' TOWN OF SOUTH D BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPAR Do you have or need the following, before applying? TOWN HALL M~1R P} ZQj~ Board of Health SOUTHOLD, NY 11 1 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 BLDG. DEPT. ' Survey TOWN F SOUTH D SoutholdTowu.Nort Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Flood Permit Examined , 20 Storm-Water Assessment Form Contact: Approved , 20^ Mail to:,.~4U'n(M~ ~~Ce~rviv, Disapprovedafc 2513b1'~ain l2c% C~~rl+oquer~~/Y1f~ Phone%3~- 73'I -lo~fGlS Expiration , 20^ Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date~~ ,v~' ' 201 INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or , areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. ' d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. - e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. E Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within l~months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required: APPLICATION IS I-IEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, hou ing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections/./ v Sig ure of applicant or name, if a corporation) ~~~3 ~~n R~,~~-~~ ~ /fir ~i9.~5 (Mailing ad ress of apphc t) Statenwhether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder ice"-/` J Name of owner of premises ~ ,rte ~n~ ~ ,~~__~n~ - (As on the tax roll or latest deed) if applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which roposed work will be done: e House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .3Jr' Block d / Lot__~-~ Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot ~ i 1 ~I i 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use a><hd.occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy y r ~ ~r~ 1 r , e b. Intended use and occupancy ~j~~~,~Yd ~ lid iy~r , , 3. Nature of work (check which applicable); New Building X Addition Alteration Repair Removal Demolition Other Work (Description) 4, Estimated Cost - Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units - Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. _ 7. Dimensioqs of existing structures, if any: Front Rear - Depth - Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear - Depth Height - Number of Stories - 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear ~3~5 ~ Depth y3P~'- ~ " Height 3is 1 2"~„~! rao->C Number of Stories z 9. Size of lot: Front st-~ ~nlan Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated So 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES_ NO~_ 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO_Wil] excess fill be removed from premises? YES_ NOS .lexnr-o Realt`1 14. Names of Owner of premises A~x»~ . 'rnc Address ,D Phone No. Name of Architect ~YYIU~k'i ~ ~?fnpl„t~, Address .Phone No f,,,~!- 734- 5 Name of Contractor Address -Phone No. 15 a. Is this properly within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO,ZC _ * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAYBE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES_ NO~ * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAYBE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? *YES_ NO_,~ * TF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. iTATE OF NEW YORK) SS: 'OUNTY O S~-eeJwlGl1 being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing con{{tract) above named, i)He is the ~~1T°t_G e~ _ _ _ (Contractor, A ent, Corporate Officer, etc.) 'said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; at all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowled a and belief; and that the work will be ;rformed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. vorn to before me thi ~ day of ~QYt~' 20 Notary Public i~r ature of Applicant t3te oS I~ow Ymrlt 4 (ri R+.6442467 ~ y,t, d rn $u'rtal'k Cotsnt~ ,a.,.n ~xoires MeY 3a,~~'?.P~) v i • FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY ~ ` SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Dater/~~1~ Date Sent: /~/~b Project Name: SC-ntGv ~u./~. Project. Address: ~~S /Lfao...~- Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- ~3 ~ - / Zoning District: /~B'O Request: ~ (Note: Copy pf Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: ~t~r Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required~e~ c~c~ / iS gnature of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: zz,,..,, P.D. Date Received: / / Date of Comment: ~ / JCJ Comments: - - ((J Si . Lr, , i _ i ~ u~aR z zoo Signature. of P_laa~ing t. S aff Reviewer Final Determination Date: / / Decision: Signature of Building Inspector , e r J ~ _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD QWNER STREET ~'ZS' VILLAGE . DIST SUB. LOT 'n v~-~` ~ L'4 /0 ~~@? .~Ca..~ Via. L L ~ , i Ct r` _ ; 4' .•1 y ~ ~ ESC FORMER {~~~f/jj~'ER N E. ~ ACR. hn ~(?~.~-(R S W ~ ~o~S~ers TYPE OF BUVLDING RES: SEAS. VL _ FARM COMM. CB. ISC M~t. Value -AND 1MP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS / / ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ d o % 3 '7 ~ 7 a Q o r1 1~3 77 Sol YAK Ti rt's SiPueiuR ^ laa /o ~ R A I N L i q Iba yda ~`1 300 5123/79 /~~79 I" oan0o ',RA is SrM REAtsy~o P ~ oi3 ~9 I DU ~ .n o ~ 1 ~ / UO ~2°f 5•/ ~ ~L z ~T m rPia/~., ~a ~GMA ~Pn~>'~. N~ 2~6TOO .00 i ~ 0 1 AGE BU3LDING CONDITION 3 l ~ ~ !1 ~q ~OZ} NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value ~ G Acr / u / 'LF~ U ~ ~ ~~a n~ wn . /D /Q~ e 1 y 'ate .ioo Tillable 2 ~ 21~ II,?.S'd ~~Eca) Tillcble 3 y y ~ ~ „ S s ;J . i Woodland i , Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER ~ =-I , ~ ~ _ ~ ~L' , ~ ' a Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD ~ ~ J 7/~ ° ° c `/5 O = 3 House Plot . DEPTH ~ arrc. ~ ; b t}G ~ BULKHEAD ; Total ~ DOCK ~ /i w h r7 _ t ca~oR . TRih1 ~ ~ i i f +I I N. Bldg. Foundation Bath dinette :xtension Basement Flows K. Extension Ext. Wails interior Finish LR. Txtension Fire p! -e Heot DR. Type Roof Rooms Tst Ftaor BR. Porch Recreation Ttoo Rooms 2nd Floo FI1V. B. Parch Dormer Breezeway Driveway Goroge - Patio O. B. ~f~ f -07 Total . r~ GJv b~ w TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: 04/05/10 TO: Nancy Steelman for Jemco Realty 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Please take notice that your application dated March 4, 2010 For permit to construct a winery at Location of property: 825 Route 25, GreenUOrt, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 35 Block 1 Lot 24 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Pursuant to Article XXIV, Section 280-127, Site Plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board is required. ~ Authorized Signature _ ~ ~J ~ ~ , ~ . 7 ~ ~ __.-_1 CC: file, Planning Bd. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Boazd of Trustees Office, the' PIaru>.irlg Depaztment, all local librazies and the Town Clerk's office. _ ' B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION APR , 4 1 SCTM# 35 - Ol _ 24 ' _ ~ The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. ® Building Dept. ~ Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certiScation: Nature and extent of action: New winery with new sanitary and waste water system parking area and driveways and natural landscaping Location of action: 825 Main Rd. - Route 25 Site acreage: 60.33 Acres Present land use: Vineyard Present zoning classification: R- 80 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Jemco Realty Associates LLC (b) Mailing address: P.O. Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) 631-477-0600, 212-582-6100 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ? No ~ If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No ? Not Applicable The property is currently zoned R-80 (Residential) and could yield approximately 30 residential lots. Instead of a major subdivision, the property is being used for agriculture (vineyard wine production). Thic „aa pYe4erVe9 unwarrl of 98s of the nronerty as open space. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes ? No ~ Not Applicable There are no historic or archeological structures on property. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ® Yes Q No ~ Not Applicable The new winery is two stories and concentrates the building volume in a central location thus preserving open space. The winery will be 1690 Ft from the street thus minimizing the visual impact along the main road. All nYi l i tari an anA merh~ni ral eQYt,i~nment LJi 11 b en Zen d wi h nri Van}/ fencing and evergreen screening Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable All rainwater runoff on developed portions of the site will be retained on site with the use of underground drywells and water reclaimation system. The proposed winery will be 700' from Long Island Sound. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ~ No ~NotApplicable All rainwater runoff is and will be retained with the use of underground drywells and water reclaimation systems. The sanitary system for the winery meets current Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services standards for sanitary was wa r The ~r~erfv will b se ved wi h nuhli wa r from the Main Rd All landscape plantings will be indigenous and drought resistant- Minimal irrigation will come from water reclaimation systems- Vineyard is not irrigated. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Proposed development is over 700' from any surface waters. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. © Yes ? No ? Not Applicable The winery will not add pollutants into the air. All construction vehicles meet the federal standards for air pollution discharge. The mechanical systems of the winery will meet the federal standards for air pollution discharge. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. © Yes ? No ? Not Applicable The construction and the use of the winery will make use of the Town's disposal and recycling center. All wastewater "sanitary" will be discharged into an approved SCDHS sanitary system. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. © Ye~ No ®Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No ©Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No ®Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ? No ~ Nat Applicable The property is currently being used for agriculture. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ? No ? Not Applicable The winery will be LEED certified and will generate electricity with a wind turbine and photovoltaics- Geothermal heat pumps will heat and cool the building, Passive systems such as natural ventilation, solar h a ;ng and increased insulation value wild offcet energy ~c i I PREPARED BY? TITLE `~yjhl~~7 DATE ~~~~j~/h Created on S/25/OS 11:20 M s».so Appendix A State Enviionmenta/ Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ Part 1 ~ Part 2 ~ Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriatel, and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impactlsl and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant~mpaCt on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. - i *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions 1,..---- - ~ MM Name of Action - 1 Name of Lead Agency - - Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer Ilf different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Jemco Winery Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 825 Main Rd. (Route25) Greenport, NY 11944, Town of Southold, Suffolk County Name of ApplicanUSponsor Jemco Realty Associates, LLC Address P.O. Box 67 City/ PO Greenport State NY Zip Code 11944 Business Telephone 477-0600 or212-582-6100 Name of Owner (if different) Jemco Realty Associates, LLC Address P.O. Box 67 City / PO Greenport State NY Zip Code 11944 Business Telephone 212.582-6100 Description of Action: Construction of a new two story Winery with basement and sanitary system, wastewater system. Installation of gravel driveways and parking area for 42 cars. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 . Present Land Use: ~ Urban ~ Industrial ~ Commercial ©Residential (suburban) ~ Rural (non-farm) Forest ~ Agriculture ©Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 60.33 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland INon-agricultural) 38.28 acres 35.88 acres Forested 1.5 acres 1.5 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 20.55 acres 20.55 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres 2.4 acres Other Ilndicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil typelsl on project site? a. Soil drainage: Well drained 100 % of site ©Moderately well drained of site. Poorly drained of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of sail are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 3701. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~ Yes ~ No a. What is depth to bedrock lin feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10% 97 % ®10- 15%_% 15% or greater 3 % 6. Is project substantiall contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? ~ Yes ? No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? >23' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Yes ~ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project areal ? Yes ~ No Page 3 of 21 11 . Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered2 Yes ~ No According ta: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Yes ® No Describe: Bluff 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ?Yes ~No If yes, explain: 14. Does the presentsite include scenic viewsknown to be important to the community? ®Yes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to whichit is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Long Island Sound b. Size lin acresl: Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~ Yes ~ No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?~Yes ~ No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes ~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Yes ~ No 7 9. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article S of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ©Yes ~i No 20. Has the site aver been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~ Yes No g, Project Description ~ . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriatel. a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 6033 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres initially; 2.4 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 37.38 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriatel e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 42 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 12 (upon completion of projectl7 h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions lin feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 38.6' width; 88' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 575.7 ft. 2. How much natural material li. e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Yes ~No ~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes ®No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~ Yes ~ No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes ~ No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 10 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~ Yes ~ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ~ Yes No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 20 ;after project is complete 6 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ®Yes ~ No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes ~ No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 1 3. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes ~ No Type Sanitary and wastewater p 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ©Yes ~No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Yes ~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~ Yes ~ No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 1/2 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~ Yes ~ No c. If yes, give name Cutchogue Dump ;location Cutchogue, NY 11935 d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes ~ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ?Yes~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes ~ No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per dayl? Yes ~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Yes ~No 21 . Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~ Yes ~ No If yes, indicate typelsl Minimum amount of electricity due [o wind turbine and solar panels 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1000 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~ Yes No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ~ Yes ~ No Site Plan Approval City, Town, Village Planning Board ~ Yes ~ No City, Town Zoning Board ?Yes ~ No Suffolk County Health Dept City, County Health Department ~ Yes ~ No Sanitary Sys[ems Other Local Agencies ©Yes ~ No Other Regional Agencies ~ Yes ~ No NY State DEC State Agencies ~ Ves © No SPEDES Permit NYS DOT Federal Agencies ?Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes ~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ® Zoning amendment ~ Zoning variance ~ New/revision of master plan ~ Subdivision Site plan ~ Special use permit ©Resource management plan ~ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? R-80 Residential 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 30 Residential lots at 2 acre/lot 4. What is the proposed zoning of tha site? N/A 5. Whatis the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~ Yes ~ No Wineries are a permitted use within this zone 7. What are the predominant land uselsl and zoning classifications within a '/a mile radius of proposed action? Residential - (single family and mu1N-family ) Commercial - (restaurant & Inn) g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y. mile? ~ Yes ~ No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorizationlsl for the formation of sewer or water districts? ©Yes ~ No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? Yes ~ No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand?~ Yes ®No f 2, Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ®Yes ~ No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Yes ©No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information pr vi ed above~.is~,true~ to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Na e Y ~!JriGI~J ~~t~ Date ~/~~~~p Signature Title If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 -PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lowerthresholds maybe appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will beany impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any - large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then considerthe impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ® YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%orgreater, (15 foot © © ©Yes ©No rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ~ © ?Yes ?No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ~ ~ ©Yes ? No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ~ ? ~ Yes ©No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ® ~ ©Yes QNo involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove © ~ ®Yes ?No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landf ll. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) ®NO ?YES • Specifclandforms: ? ? ?Yes ?No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ? ? ?Yes ? No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water © ? ?Yes ®No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ? ? ?Yes ? No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ? ? ?Yes ? No area. • Other impacts: ® ? ?Yes ®No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ?NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ? © ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ? ? ?Yes ? No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ? ? ©Yes ? No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water © ? ?Yes ? No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ? ? ?Yes ? No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ? ® ?Yes ? No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ? ? ?Yes ? No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ® ? ?Yes ? No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without © ? ?Yes ? No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ? ? ?Yes ? No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact ProjedChange 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ®NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ? ? ?Yes ?No floodway. • Otherimpacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ©NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ? ? ?Yes ?No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ? ? ?Yes ? No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour ? ? ?Yes ? No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ? ? ?Yes ?No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ? ? ?Yes ?No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ®NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ? ? ?Yes ? No Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ® ? ®Yes ©No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ? ? ?Yes ? No otherthan for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No g, Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangeredspecies? ®NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ® ? ?Yes ? No or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ? ? ?Yes ®No mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ? NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to ? ? ®Yes ? No agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ? ? ?Yes ©No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ? ? ?Yes ? No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of © ~ ? Yes ~ No agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ? © ? Yes ? No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) ?NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different ? ? ? Yes ? No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of © © ? Yes ? No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ? ? ? Yes ? No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ~NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ? ? ? Yes ? No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ? ? ? Yes ? No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive © ? ? Yes ? No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ® ® Yes ? No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ~ ~ ~ Yes ~ No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ? Q ®Yes ? No • Otherimpacts: ? Q ®Yes QNo IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(8)? ~NO ®YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? © © ?Yes ~No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ~ ~ ~ Yes ~No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ® ® ~ Yes ?No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the 0 ~ ©Yes QNo resource? • Other impacts: Q ~ ?Yes QNo Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ? NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ? ? ?Yes ? No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ®NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the ? ? ?Yes ? No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ? ? ?Yes ? No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ?NO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? ?Yes ? No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ? ? ?Yes ? No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would ad as a ? ? ?Yes ? No noise screen. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ?NO ®YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ? ? ?Yes ?No hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there maybe a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardouswastes" ? ? ?Yes ?No in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ? ? ?Yes ? No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ? ? ?Yes ? No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Otherimpacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON GROWiH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? ?Yes ? No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ? ? ?Yes ? No services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ? ? ?Yes ? No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ? ? ?Yes ?No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ? ? ®Yes ?No services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Page 19 of 21 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact ee Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ? ? ?Yes ? No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ?NO ?YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 • Part 3 -EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~~F SDUryO SouthOold~NY 1 971 MARTIN H. SIDOR ,`Q Chair ~ # OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS e/+ ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G ~ ~O 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH LDTOWNSEND ~~CDU~ ~ (cor. Mai~Rd. aYlo`u~ngs Ave.) Telephone: 631 766-1838 Fas: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: May 24, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached check into a deferred account. Fee is for a site plan application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicnnt/Project Name & Tnx Mnp Amount Check Date/No. T e # Authorization Code JEMCOSP 35-1-24 $2,542 5/20!10-#122 - ' 4, 2 2 -JENtCO~REALTI~~SSC)CIk7ES tLC- tztas fn~~ea ~r}~/~~ y~,~/-~)W -:'PAX tO-lY~~r~A~~~ ~ ~ SL/iA°f-~\'*kY VO~.aY ~ I .-1~' -ORDFjt©4~ 4V"V ~ ~~a'~~`^ait!m-+„S~~1W~ 7 V'~-'i ~~6®LLeYkS_:"'.~*~u_ Att. amw+o ~l~ 1 ~cs'`'~3C~ _ '1' ~l:'D i"1]f3O l7~ ~:1 i; ~OA7 ~ 'i'~ 4 a . ~ASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Tvpe: Approved Proiect Tvpe: Site Plans Status: Final - Pending Inspection SCTM # : 1000 - 35.-1-24 Proiect Name: JEMCO Winery Address: 825 NYS Rt. 25, Greenport Hamlet: Greenport Applicant Name JEMCO Realtv Associates, LLC Owner Name: JEMCO Realtv Associates, Inc. Zone 1: R-80 Approval Date: 2/14/2011 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 2/16/2011 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location The site is located approximately 200' east of Bailey Avenue, on the north side of NYS Route 25. SC Filing Date: C and R's Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCANNED FEB 2 ? 2011 SCAN Date: Records Management N/O/F p£coNIC LANDING AT souTHOLD INC. CoUHT¥ eEPT. Olr I CALL 652-5754, 48 HOUN$ TO $ SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: TOTAL SITE AREA: VINEYARD: 1000-35-01-24 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC ZONING: FLOOD: ZONE SURVEYOR: R-80 Zone "X" Peconlc Surveyors t230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. 49618 DATED:1993 w/update OCTOBER 21, 2009 VINEYARD LOCATION MAP S21 '05'$0"E / / ~o \ \ \ PARKING ~. GRAVEL WN \ ,~lL ........ .'- / ~,., / / / / I I I ~ ~.0 I ~/ ~%.~ B7' 2~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 521 'J4'40"E N/O/F P£CONIC LANDING AT $ouTHoLD INC. OVERALL SITE PLAN 8301^~J38 N.L1V3t-I '00 SCALE 1" = 100' LONG ISLAND SOUND / / .MuE'r SE IN[IPEGTED BY TH/ ~,0UNTY DEPT, OF HEALTH SEF Suffolk County Departreent of Hearth Services Approval for Construction-Other Than Single Fareily No. dO'tr 10-0003 'I'be;e plans ~ave hoer/reviewed tbr general conformlmce with Suffolk County Dep~rtment of Health Services standards, relating to water supply and sewage disposal, Regardless of any omissions, iucor,.istencies or lack of detail, con,traction is mluired to be in accordance with the attached permit conditions and applicable standards, unless specifically waived by the Department. This approval expires 3 years from the approval date, un!esB extended or renewed. i Iir- II~ Ill~I, ~ ','il IL~i ~ I ~iiiI FOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH Rev. 6/?J20re SCHD NIA COMMENTS DATED 51t8f20t0 I Ol ~ll 0911 DRAWI~I/BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 }CALE: 1" = 10W-0" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NO.: ......... '--. 30 \ ] ~ - I ( ) MUST BE INSP~CTED BY THE - '. ' .~ .... ~- ~" 29 ' ,, - ~IN ~ ON ~OO~ AREA TO B~ ~I~TED ~l.O ~TO UN~ROUN~ ~TO~¢E TANKS ~ N PITCH ~ ~ ~ILL ~E USED ~o~ LANDSCAPE / i (I) ~ FT DIA x ~ ~T HT ~TO~E TANK5 (St) 60NTOU~ / I ~ / - , t ~ASTE ~ 5~ST~H t / i () ~OO ~AL ~ FT DAx ~FTLD (STL) ...... ,' I 5E~LEHENT TAN~ ............... / LEACHIN~ POOL ~ ~ .......... ~ , I . '- '~,..~. .,~' .'-'. .~ .z~ '~-: ', .... ...~,. , ~-'~ ...' :~,A'-~.}.,''-,~;~.." I ~ I ~ ~,.. .... . ~.~., ..... . ........... . ....... I ..... ~t. . , .... + ......... . k -'~ ~" -. ' ................ ' '.. ' ~A~' . ' ............... . "' " m~- 'Il .......... , . . ., .... , ~KI~ I~ ~ ~ ,,. -., ...... ....... . , ..,. . ,..~. .:...:. :.., .. ,...? : .... ...., . -,...,. Iqo'l ' ""~ .... ' ' " ....... ' "' ' .... ' ' ..... ~ ' ....... .... ' ' ...... '" ...... H~LTH ........................ SUFFOLK COUNTY WIND i ..................... ............... *-, . .- ............. · ..... ,*, - .... ~ .- 26 2~ Ol 0911 DRAWN BY: UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE GRADING DRAINAGE & LAYOUT PLAN SHEETNO.: /F EL ~1.o q~ ~IALL FF EL oI.o LINE ELL~v'ATION + oO.'q FT. I* MIN..2' MAD(. 114"/t=% I/~"/~T. ~TTL~ MENT TANK POOL WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WINERY SYSTEM #2, NO SCALE TOP OF POOL IE. .l'r=t.l~,l,. [] [] I'. ,1 50LIP RIN~ B"~T. MIN tOP OF: PO~L IE. POOJ. HIN t TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL WASTE WATER SYSTEM SETTLEMENT TANK - 1200 GALLON N.T.S. WASTE WATER SYSTEM WASTE WATER CALCULATIONS WASTE WATER PROCESSING WINE PRODUCTION AREA WASH DOWN OF WINE MAKING EQUIPMENT 395 GPD TOTAL WASTE WATER PROCESSING .395 GPD WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: WASTE WATER SYSTEM - 395 GPD 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 395 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 790 GAL (t) t,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 4 FT LD) 2.LEACHING POOLS 395 GPD 1 1.5 SF I GPD = 263 SF USE 10 FT DIAx 10 FT HT POOL (LP) EFFECTIVE DEPTH (10 FT. DIA. X 9.67 FT. HT,) = 303,6 S.F. PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): t0 FT DIA x t0 FT HT Suffolk Couni~.y ~)~partment uf Health Servke~ Approval for ConBtruction-Other Than Single F~ly U.e(.) ~0~_~ .......... ~' These pla~ have ~.~iew~ fir general mn-i~'~-~t%~ Cowry De.meat of ~'e~th ~i~s ~n~, mlstin~ ~ wn~r supply a~d sewage disposal, ~egardles. of any omission~, in~is~n~ies or lack o~ de~l, ~n~tru~on is mq~ ~ ~ in s~d~ s, ~less s~lly waived by the ~p~ment. ~is appeal o~ires 3 year~ ~m the approval ~, ~e~s e~n~ or mnow~, App~ Date ~ FRe~ewar ~ ~ TYPICAL CLEAN OUT DETAIL N.T.S. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: PARKING AREA DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR (DW) "A." 14,662 SI='. X (2112 FT.) X 0.9 = 2,111 CU. FT. USE: (4) 8' DIIAMETER x 12' HIGH POOL (4) 8' X 12' STORM DRAIN RING = 2,026 CU. FT. USE: (4) 8' DIIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (4) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 216 CU. FT. P_B.QYJDED REQUIRED 2,242 CU. F'r. > 2,111 CU. FT. CRUSHING I LOADIING AREA DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR (DW) "B" 3,545 SF. X (2112 FT.) X 0.9 = 511 CU. FT. USE: (2) 8 DIIAMETERx6 HIGH POOL (2) 8' X 6' STORM DRAIN RING = 507 CU. FT. USE: (2) 5'DIIAMETER SOLIDWALL DOMES (2) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 108 CU. FT. PJ~iV. IDEQ REQUIRED 615 CU. FT. > 511CU. FT. ROOF STRUCTURE RAIN WATER ON ROOF AREA TO SE DIRECTED TO UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS. RAIN WATER WILL SE USED FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGIATION. LEED CERTIFICATION STORAGE AREA X RAINFALL TANK (TK) "C" 3,803SF. X (2112FT.) =60ECU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL (2) 5' X 6' SOL-ID WALL RING = 507 CU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIIAMETERSOMDWALLDOMES (2) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES [] 108 CU. FT. RUNOFF FACTOR 0.9 = 237 CU. FT. USE: (1) 8' DIIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL (1) 8' X 6' STORM DRAIN RING = 253 CU. FT. USE: (1) 8' DIIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (1) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 54 CU. FT. ~_(~33/]J;)EQ REQUIRED 307' CU. FT. > 237 CU. FT. ROAD ENTRY / CURB CUT AREA DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X (DW)"D" 1,576SF. X (2112FT.) X IE. +25.5 E,R.A~E 27.0 FT. FT. 1/4"/I=T.MIN 2'7.0 FT. SEPTIC TANK __ ~J_L%S~. _ I'~ ~'~. SEPTIC PROFILE FOR WINERY SYSTEM #1, NO SCALE MJN. I' MIN. 2' IN~ 25.14 FT. _ _~1 POOL BOT OF POOL "ii TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL SEPTIC SYSTEM SANITARY CALCULATIONS I. ALLOWASLE DENSITY TOTAL ACERAGE: 39.78 ACRES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER ALLOWABLE DENSITY; 39.78 Acres x 600 GPD. = 23,868 GPD. SITE DENSITY CALCULATION WINERY: 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD/Occupant} 5 GPD X 100 Occupants = 500 GPD 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) 0.06 GPD X 1,498 SF = 89.9 GPD 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) 0.04 GPD X 3,147 SF = t25.9 GPD 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) 0.03 GPD X 565 SF = t6.9 GPD TOTAL SITE DENSITY FLOW = 732.7 GPD PROJECT NOT OVER DENSITY SANITARY DESIGN SBNAGE DESIGN FLOW: WINERY: 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD + 2.5 GPD/Occupant) 7.5 GPD X 100 Occupants = 750 GPD 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) 0.06 GPD X 1,498 SF = 89.9 GPD 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) 0.04 GPD X 3,147 SF = 125.9 GPD 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) 0.03 GPD X 565 SF = 16.9 GPD SEWAGE FLOW = 982.TGPD TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 982.7 GPD I1. SANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SEPTIC SYSTEM - 902.7 GPD 1.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 982.7 GPD x 2 DAY FLOW = t,965.4 GAL USE MINIMUM: 2,000 GAL SEPTIC TANK (t0 FT DIA x 4 FI' LD) 2.GREASE TRAP (GT) USE MINIMUM: (8 FT DIA x 5 FT LD) 3.LEACHING POOLS ( LP ): 982.71 1.5 S.F.IGPD = 655.1 S.F. USE MINIMUM ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X t0 FT. HT.) EFFECTIVE DEPTH ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 9.67 FT. HT.) = 725.25 S.F, PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 2 - 8 FT DIA xl0 FT HT III. .ET Ll~ k SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON N.T.$. SEPTIC SYSTEM INL.~ OUTLET GREASE TRAP N.T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM TEST H_O_ LE_BY MARK McDONALD NO SCALE GEOSCIENCE TEST HOLE DATA (4/6/20¶0) SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1¶E7~ GRADE EL:26.8' 3 FT. 4 FT. 23 FT. DARK BROWN LOAM OL BROWN SILT r.1L BROWN SILTY SAND WI 20% GRAVEL SM BROWN FiNE TO COARSE SAND SW NO WATER ENCOUNTERED _SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: 1000-35-01-24 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 TOTAL SITE AREA: 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. VINEYARD: 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC ZONING: R-80 FLOOD: Zone "X" ZONE SURVEYOR: Peconlc Surveyors 1230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO.49618 DATED:1993wlupdMe OCTOBER21,2009 VINEYARD SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH Rev. 617J2010 ECHD NIA COMMENTS DATED 511812010 i, 1 pIfO3~TR I: 1109 D~WN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL ~4, 2010 SCALE: NO SCALE SHEET TITLE: DETAILS/ CALCU~TIONS SHEET NO: S ~0 o o OVERFLOW I~ARE3NG'- \ ,,, \ \ __.1 982.87' S21 '05'30"E N/O/F PECONIC LANDING AT sOUTHOLD INC. S21 '34'40"E / / 410.00' LOCATION MAP TEST HOLE .Y .ARK "cDORA'D GEOSCIENCE NO SCALE TEST HOLE DATA ( 4/612010)SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 GRADE EL:26.8' ~~ .._OAMOL I OVERALL SITE PLAN -SWPPP 3 FTJ BROWN SILT ML SCALE 1" = 100' 4 FT. BROWN SILTY SAND WI 20% GRAVEL SM .~ BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND SW ~ 23 FT. NO WATER ENCOUNTERED 100 200 300 400 500 GRAPHIC SCALE GENERAL STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES SITE DESCRIPTION Development activities for this preJent will consist of the consbection of a new wine~ building ateng with all associated cite work. The site ~ will Include: grading of the proposed road and building surfaces; Installing the proposed dralnagu structures; Instaltetion of proposed sanitary system and water lines; eiocthc lines; wind turbine; paving of the proposed road; construction of the building. All Improvements am to GENERAL SEQUENCE OF SITE ACTIVITIES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE 1, Installation of erosion centre] measures (slit fence banlore, slope steballzatien, 4. Instetiation of remaining erosion control measures (inlet proteofon). SITE DATA Slta Area: 60.22 Anres Pre-Development Runoff Coefficient: 30.00 % (light vegeteti~) post-Development Runoff Coefficent: 32.2 % Soil Ctesciflcatten: See test hole Receiving Watare' LOW p~nt on cite POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES In accordance with the previsions of the USEPA General Per,nit, ston~ water management and erosion and sediment control measures Including, but not Ibslted to, the fallowing shall be employed during consbecfl~n: A. Existing vegetetion to remain shall be protected (by Installation of consbectien fence or other approved means) and shall remain undisturbed. B. Clearing and Grading shati true scheduled so as to minimize the extent of exposed areas and the tength of time that areas are exposed. A maximum of 5 acres shall be dlsiorbed at one time unless wfltten permission ts granted by the NYSDEC. Graded and s~ppod ames shall be kept statsllzed through the use of temporary seeding as required. Seed mlxioras shall be In accordance with the sell conversation service recommendations. C. Bare sobs shall be seeded within 14 days of exposure, unless consbeclfen will begin within 21 days as sections are cempteted~ o; if construction on an area is suspended, the area shall be seeded Immediately. a Seed preperetion- scefify soil If compacted, remove debes and obstlcitss such as roots and stumps. b. Soil Amendments 1. Lime te ph 6.0 2. Fertilize with 660ti lbs of 5-10-10 or equivalent per acm (14 lbs/100 sq ff ) c. Seed Mix,ms 1. Temporary seedlings a. Ryegrass (annual or perennial) ~ 30 lbs. per a~re (0.7 lbs per 1,titi0 sq. 1~.) b. Cart(fled "Amosteok" winter rye (cereal rye) @ lgg Ibs~ per acre (2.5 lbs per 1,0g0 sq. ff.) use winter rye if seeding in OctedeflNovember. 2. Permanent seedlings - See Landscaping plans D. The length and steepness of cleared slopes shall be minimized to reduce runoff velocities. Runoff shall be dlver~ed away from cleared slopes. E. Sediment shall be trapped on the site and not permitted ta enter adjacent properties or pobllc roads or drainage systems. Sediment barriers shtsl be [nstelesd slang the Ilmlte of dlsiorbance prior to the start of construcpon and shall be maintained until c~nsbecti~ Is complete. F. A stabilized construction entrance shall be mtsntalned to prevent sail and loose babes fram being tracked onto local roads. The construction entrance shall be malnte~nnd until the stie Is bermane~tiy sthblllzed. Any sediment tracked onto pobllc reads to be removed or cleaned on a dally basis. G./MI renoff shall be retained on cite in accordance with lo,ct regulations and approvals. Drainage inlets Installed en site shall be protected from sediment buildup through the use of appropriate Inlet pmiocbsn. H. Appropriate means shall be used to conb~l dust during consbeci~ea. I. Sediment berrlers and other erocion control measures shall remain In place until upland disturbed areas are permanently stabilized. Fotiowing permanent stabilization, paved area shall be cthaned of soil and debris and dndnage systems shall be cle~n~ and tiushnd as necessary. J. The owner/ope rater/cent rector ts responsible for Inspection and proper maintenance of erosion conffol measures. Inspections must be performed by a =erti~ed erosion conbe] speclwist, licensed profescional engineer or a trained technician working under the supervision of a licensed professional englnear every seven calendar days and Immediately a~er petinds of rainfall greteer than one half Inch. Maintenance measrues are to Include. but are not limited to, cleaning of recharge basins, sediment traps and drywetis, cleaning End repolr of sediment banlore, repair of berms and n~noff dive,ers, and cleaning and repair of inlet protectiea devices. The owner/opereter/conbecter ts required to maintain copies of the NOI, SWPPP & General Pan'nit on_site at all times. NOJ and General Permit shall be posted al all times. K. During consbection, the contractor wlti comply wtih all local regulations concerning the disposal of solid waste and debris and toxic and hazardous waste, as wall as sentia~ sewer and septic system regulations. Temporary fencing shall be erected around the perimeter of the site along with the placement of dumpoters to control the buildup of debds, The contractor shall periodically clean up any debris accumulated along the temporary fence and empty the dumpeiore regularly. L After the project is complete, the owner/operator will be responsible for tiling a Notice of Termlnatlan (NOT) with the NYSDEC to close out the open BPDES General Peffnti No. G P-0-.tis-0gt for Storm Water Runoff from the construction activity. M. The contracter must complete the construction sequence acheduts in the raper1 with sla~t and end dates. Unless otberwlse directed by the owner, the contractar ts responsible for malntalalng the necessary records of constrection activities, preparation of Inspection re~, and reporting release of pollutants to the proper aofhorltiea as necessary to comply wtih the NabsDwide Permlti The contractor ~11 re;x~ any required rnodlflctatens to the SWPPP necessitated by field conditions or consbecfle;q activities te the EnglneeflArchltect for revision of the SWPPP where apprefldate. SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: TOTAL SITE AREA: VINEYARD: NON PLANTED: 1,732,817-- 39.78 AC 1000-35-01-24 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC ZONING: R-80 FLOOD: Zone "X" ZONE SURVEYOR: Peconlc Surveyors 1230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. 49618 DATED:1993 wi update OCTOBER 21, 2009 VINEYARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL SPDES - GENERAL PERMIT el PROJECT NO: 0911 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY:Ns DATE: DECEMBER 22, 20t0 SCALE: 1"=100'-0" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SWPPP SHEET NO.: N SURVEY OF PROPERTY FOR Z M REALTY CO. AT GREENPORT TO ~TV OF SO UTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,N. Y. 1000--35--01--~4 SCALE' 1"=100' APRIL 26, 1994 OCTOBER 21, 2009 (LOCA17ZD VINEYARD) ~o¢s S86~3'15'~ 15796' APR 14 2010 ViN[YARD ViNEY~'RD ¢¢¢¢o¢ CERTIFIED TO: JEM REALTY CO. ~ 'S76'50'30"W 576.40' V1NEyARD ~ ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 72090? THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. EXCEPT AB PER SECTION 7209-SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR ~HOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. N. ES. LIC. NO. 49618 PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 P.O. BOX 909 1230 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD, N,Y. 11971 ~T~"~---J. LIU SURVEY OF PROPERTY FOR J.M REALTY CO. AT GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000- 25- O1-24 SCALE' 1"=100' APRIL 28, 1994 OCTOBER 21, 2009 'LOCATED VINEYARD) S86"Z,$'i S"E 137,96' /\ ~NEYARD ~N£YARD 576.4-0' CERTIFIED TO: JEM REALTY CO. ~N£YARD ' 'S76.50,30"W ~N£YARD ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 720goF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCA770N LAW. EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209-SUBDIFIBION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE vALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON· N.Y.S. LIC. NO, 49618 PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. (631) 765-5020 FAX (6.51) 765-1797 P.O, BOX 909 12J0 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLO, N.Y. 11971 ~.~-r--.~.~ NOTE: MAIN EN EXIT / / / / / / \ / \ N/O/F KoN ToKOSTA I \ '"x \ OVERFLOW \ PARKING \ ORAREL \ INC. I AT soUTHOLD pEcONIC LANDING / ,,/o.F / / / . ~ ~ / / / = / LOCATION MAP g82.87' ~- R-80 Zone "X" Peconlc Surveyors 1230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 $21'05'$Q"£ SITE DATA SCTM # 1000-35-01-24 PROPERTY: 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 OWNER: Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 TOTAL SITE AREA: 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. VINEYARD: 895,t58 SF = 20.55 AC NON PLANTED: t,732,8t7= 39.78 AC ZONING: FLOOD: ZONE SURVEYOR: LICENCE NO. 49618 DATED:t993 w/update OCTOBER 21, 2009 VINEYARD S21'54'40"E / / / / ( 9~ 0 410.00' N/O/F PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD INC. OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = 100' LONG ISLAND SOUND NOTE: FUTURE BEACH ACCESS LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD, DEC AND TRUSTEES APPROVAL REQUIRED / / / / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL Ol 0911 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL t4, 2010 iCALE: 1" = 100"0" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEETNO.: MAIH EN EXIT N/o/F KoNTOKOSTA ~0 N/O~F pECONIC LANDING AT soUTHOLD INC. SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: 1000-35-01-24 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 TOTAL SITE AREA: 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. VINEYARD: 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC ZONING: R-80 FLOOD: Zone "X" ZONE SURVEYOR: Peconlc Surveyors t230 Traveler St, Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. 49618 DATED:1993 w/update OCTOBER 2t, 2009 VINEYARD LOCATION MAP S21 '05'30"E OVERFLOW PARKING GRAVEL 982.87' 5O N/O/F PECONIC LANDING AT SOU~IOLD INC. \ \ \ / OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = 100' S21 \ 410. OO' LONG ISLAND SOUND / / / / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL OI / P~,OJS~O,, 091t DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1" = 100"-0" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NO.: 25 26 5~IAL~: AT ~E[D~t= 28 'h ~T ON \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PAt SCALE: 1" = WIND TURBINE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ DE~,,TI C~ D'r'~TEH (I) 20~O ~AL OEPTIC. TANK, iO F~T DIA x 4- F'r L~ (ST) ~A.~-- 'r~.AP (eT) (5) ~ PT. ~!~k. X ~1 PT. HT. LEAC~HINE~ POOL (LP) (.2) ~ PT PlA ~< ~ PT HT (EXP) EXPAN51OI~ POOL \ \ Jl 29 30 ' \ \ 31 \ \ 32 \ % J \ \ " I I\ ' \ \ 29 \ 28 \ \ -. ....... 5 ~ ~ ,., .. ~L ~1~ 42" H ~1c1~ OVERFL~)W PARKING PLAN 60 SPACES '--- k 30 31 \ ,; 31 ~B ;AREA 31 .......' 30 29 30 PARKING CALCULATIONS BASEMENT FLOOR AREA: 3,349 SF FIRST FLOOR AREA: 3,349 SF SECOND FLOOR AREA: WEST MEZZANINE: 823 SF EAST MEZZANINE: 898 SF TOTAL: 8,4t 9 SF PARKING REQUIRED - 1 SPACE / 200 SF PARKING PROVIDED - 42 SPACES OVERFLOW PARKING (350 SFISPACE) GRAVEL AREA - 36 SPACES LAWN AREA - 60 SPACES TOTAL: 96 SPACES X 'x t~NIN ~'~"f~ ON f~2OP A'I~EA TO ~ ~l O TO UND~¢~OUND ¢TO~A~D TAN~5. ~IN PITOH, ~T~ ~lbk B~ USD~ ~0~ LAND~A~ IR~I~ATION. ~ (I) ~ FT DIA x ~ ~T HT 5TO~E O~FLO~ ~ILL ~I~D TO SAME 51ZE / I I 5ETTLEHENT TAN~ ~ j (m) IO FT pla x lO ~T HT (bP) ' ~ LEACHIN~ POOL ~ (I) I0 PT DIA x I0 PT HT ~ EXPANDION POOL 26 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 'x x, \ \ \ X \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ TOWN OF SOU~HOLD l/ SITE PLAN APPROVAL 26 27 REVISED: Dec 3, 2010 Dec 22, 20t 0 m OI SITE GRADING DRAINAGE & LAYOUT PLAN NO.: ~ . . . LEED CERIFICATION STANDARDS . ...,:.....~,......... ~...,,.. . . ...... . .... ... , .., ~. ,, , · .. ...... ; ~,. ,;t., PLANT LIST (Native Plants) . ..,.,.., ,.~,.,,,~ .,. ,..-:, ..,,.....,., .,,.. ........ 5vcr~reen . .....: ., ..., ~ ~~ ~ ~.:: C'::',~I ~ _,~ · .., .,..:., -:.....~; .i · . · ,.-... .~.. ,., ....,.-, :-~.-*'......:..-',- ~ I ~ ~ ~1 ~c -.. ~t.., .-.. ~ - ~.. i,'. ~- '., '~., ~,~.': ,.....:...,:.,.. ~ .~'111) ~,~o, [1~. ~,,~, r'..'.~-: .- .' .:~. , i ~, ~~ RTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN ' .~..~ ,.~....,... , .,,~,~ I OVERFLOW PARKING -.~: '*,'-.;.,," *- ?. ..... . ~;'~;~,.~: ,.......~..., ... .,.~ ...... ~ .... ~.,.....:.-:" .. ...... ~.- .~....,.~. ~... ~.*.......,~:. ~,. ~' ,. .* ~ . ,-. ~ ..-,-., ...... ~V~-:.:.,., ,-.~ , ~- .... ~ . ~ : ..... ~ ....... . .... , .", ..: .-, - ,~ .... . *-' , · ,* ..?~.~ ~.-W:':. ';.~ .. I ~' ~, ~- N~~ I ~- *:../. .'~.. ',, '...,"' ' , .~. .*': .... · '::.,.,,.,'-: ,.'. ' '. ',~: '...v.'".,, '..~ ":..:,*..','. .. '., ;' .~ . / ~ ~% ~ ~ ) -*.. -, ...,, ..... < .,: >.." :.~...:,--. *,, .-.*:, .-.*::...*. - ,: ..-*:..',: .,,. *--._ ~...'.. - .: ...... ,,..-..: '. ,...... '.~ / Wl~n ~ ....,...,., .., .,, .... ~......-,._..-.~.~. .~,.,..~ .,~ ,.. ..... .. ,.,-,~.~.. ~ ..~.. · Gl ,ROJECT~ 0911 DRAWN BY: UT CHECKED BY: N8 DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE .ANDSCAPING & LIGHTING PLAN SHEETNO.: EXIST. ~=IR~ ' H'i"Dt:~.ANT ~XIST. POL~, POLt~ (LIPA~45) ~ ~ Pl~ln9 ,' PARTIAL SITE P~N ~~ ~OWN OFSOUTHOLD ~ - ~ ~x / ~ ~ ~ ~ SIT~ PLAN APPROVAL 0 /"<' ~I '"'"" I ~DIN~ J D~INAGE J LANDSOAPE J LAYOUT J ~f;~AD~ LI/~E ;=L~VATION ~ = t~[.JIL~21N¢ PIALL CP, ADE LINE ELEVATION + 20.q FT. ~ I PF ~ 21.0 ~ I' HIN. 2' HA~ I I / ' -- ' ~ ~EI I Ell b I/¢"¢T.J, I I / I~.~ ~T, I I _ ~'~ ~ I I ~ "' I ¢'~ ~' ~*. I/E~"./PT. IE. +I¢.OJ ~XPAN~IO PoOL WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WINERY NO SCALE INLET TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL WASTE WATER SYSTEM SETTLEMENT TANK. 1200 GALLON ..T.s. WASTE WATER SYSTEM WASTE WATER CALCULATIONS WASTE WATER PROCESSING WINE PRODUCTION AREA WASH DOWN OF WINE MAKING EQUIPMENT 395 GPD TOTAL WASTE WATER PROCESSING 395 GPD WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: WASTE WATER SYSTEM - 395 GPD 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 396 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 790 GAL (1) 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 4 FT LD} 2.LEACHING POOLS 395 GPD 1 1.5 SF / GPD = 263 SF USE t0 FT DIA x 10 FT HT POOL (LP) EFFECTIVE DEPTli (10 FT. DIA. X 9.67 FT. HT.) = 303.6 S.F. PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 10 FT DIA x 10 FT HT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: ROAD ENTRY I CURB CUT AREA DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR 1,576SF. X (2112FT.) X 10-263CU=: FT '(OWl'S' USE: (1) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL (1) 8' X 6' STORM DRAIN RING = 253 CU. FT. USE: (1) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (1) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 54 CU. FT. PARKING AREA DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR (DW)"A" 14,662SF. X (2112FT.) X 1.0=2,~.~.~.CU. FT. USE: (4) 8' DIAMETER x 12' HIGH POOL (4) 8' X 12' STORM DRAIN RING = 2,026 CU. FT. USE: (1) 8' DIAMETERx4' HIGH POOL (1) 8' X 4' STORM DRAIN RING = 168 CU. FT. USE: (5) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (5) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 270 CU. FT. PJ~J~]DEQ REQUIRED 2,464 CU. FT. > 2,~.~.~. CU. FT. CRUSHING / LOADING AREA .EJ[O_V.]Dff.~ REQUIRED 307 CU. FT. > 263 CU. FT. OVERFLOW PARKING DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR (DW)"E' t6,424SF. X (2112FT.) X 0.6=1642CU, FT. USE: (3) 6' DIAMETER x 12' HIGH POOL (3) 8' X 12' STORM DRAIN RING = 1,526 CU. FT. USE: (3) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (3) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 162 CU. FT. PROVIDED REQUIRED 1682 CU. FT. > 1642 CU. FT. DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR D "B" - (W) 3,545SF, X (2112.F,T.) X 1.6-591CU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIAMETERx 6 HIGH POOL (2) 8' X 6' STORM DRAIN RING = 507 CU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (2) 0' SOLID WALL DOMES = 108 CU. FT. 615 CU. FT. > 591 CU. FT. ROOF STRUCTURE RAIN WATER ON ROOF AREA TO BE DIRECTED TO UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS. RAIN WATER WILL BE USED FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION, LEED CERTIFICATION - OVERFLOW WILL BE DIRECTED TO SAME SIZE DRYWELLS STORAGE AREA X RAINFALL TANK 3,803 SF. X (2112 FT.) = 609 CU. FT. (TK) "C" USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL (2) 8' X 6' SOLID WALL RING = 507 CU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (2) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 108 CU. FT. AREA X RAINFALL DRYWELL 3,803SF. X (2112FT.) =609CU. FT. (DW) "C" USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL (2) 8' X 6' STORM DRAIN RING = 507 CU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (2) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 168 CU. FT. FF E1 ~4.O IE. +2.7.4'/ IE. 2.7.0 FT. I/~-"/FT. 2'7.0 FT. ~t;~EASE' ~ IE. 5EPTIC~ TANK SEPTIC PROFILE FOR WINERY NO SCALE TOP o~= POOL O5.41 ~T. POOL POOL PT. TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL SEPTIC SYSTEM SANITARY CALCULATIONS I. ALLOWABLE DENSITY TOTAL ACERAGE: 39.78 ACRES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER ALLOWABLE DENSITY: 39.78 Acres x 600 GPD. = 23,868 GPO. SITE DENSITY CALCULATION WINERY: 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPDIOccupant) 5 GPD X 98 Occupants = 490 GPD 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) 0.06 GPD X t,498 SF = 89.9 GPD 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) 0.04 GPD X 3,147 SF = 125.9 GPD 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPD/SF) 0.03 GPD X 565 SF = 16.6 GPD TOTAL SITE DENSITY FLOW = 722.7 GPD PROJECT NOT OVER DENSITY II. SANITARY DESIGN SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: WINERY: 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD + 2.5 GPDIOccupant) 7.5 GPD X 98 Occupants = 735 GPD 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) 0.06 GPD X 1,498 SF = 89.9 GPD 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) 0.04 GPD X 3,147 SF = 125.9 GPD 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) 0.03 GPD X 565 SF = 16.9 GPD SBNAGE FLOW = 982.TGPD TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 967.7 GPD ' III. SANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SEPTIC SYSTEM - 967.7 GPD 1.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 967.7 GPD x 2 DAY FLOW = 1,935.4 GAL USE MINIMUM: 2,000 GAL SEPTIC TANK (10 FT DIA x 4 ICl. LD) 2.GREASE TRAP (GT) USE MINIMUM: (8 FT DIA x 5 FT LD) 3.LEACHING POOLS ( LP ): 967.711.5 S.F.IGPD = 645.1 S.F. USE MINIMUM ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 9 FT. HT.) EFFECTIVE DEPTH ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 8.67 FT. lit.) = 650.25 S.F. PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 2 - 8 FT DIA x 9 FT HT INLET SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON N.T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM INLET GREASE TRAP SEPTIC SYSTEM BY MARK McDONALD TEST HOLE.EoSO,E.CE NO SCALE $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 TEST HOLE DATA (4/612010) 1 FT. DARK BROWN LOAM OL J~ 3FT. BROWNSILT ML 4FT. BROWNSILTYSANDWI20%GRAVEL SM BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND SW SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: 1000-35-01-24 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 TOTAL SITE AREA: 2,627,975 SQ. FT. [] 60.33 AC. VINEYARD: 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC ZONING: R-80 FLOOD: Zone "X" ZONE SURVEYOR: Peconlc Surveyors 1230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. X DATED:1993 wi update OCTOBER 21, 2009 VINEYARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL REVISED: Dec. 3, 2010 Dec. 22, 2010 PRO¢~T NO: 1100 DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: NO SCALE SHEET TITLE: DETAILS/ CALCULATION.¢ SHEET NO: SP- MAIN EN1 EXIT GENERAL STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES SITE DESCRIPTION building along with all associated site work. The sits work will Include: grading of the proposed mad and building surfaces; Installing the proposed drainage s~ctures; Instsltstlon of pmpased sanitary system and watsr lines; electdc lines; wind tsrblne; paving of the proposed mad; construcllon of the building. All Improvements am ts mmform to State, County and local standards end sFeclfica~ons. 1. Installation of erosion cordml measures {slit fence bardem, slope stsbalrzaflon, N/O/F ~- ~1 KoNTOKOSTA ~ ~ t~' _ ~0 ~0 N/O/F pEcoNIC LANDING AT soUTHOLD INC. TEST HOLE S MA..McDO.A'. NO SCALE GEOSCIENCE TEST HOLE DATA (4/6/2010) SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 GRADE EL:26.8' 1FT. DARK BROWN LOAM eL 3 FT. BROWN SILT ML 4 FT. 23 FT. BROWN SILTY SAND W/20% GRAVEL SM :2D' BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND SW NO WATER ENCOUNTERED \ / / DEER FBNGING S21'05'$0"E OVERFLOW 982.87'~5 / / \ \ \ \ \ \ DO I I /~ I SI~T FEHCING TO BE __-I \ \ \ N/O/F PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD INC. OVERALL SITE PLAN -SWPPP SCALE 1" = t00' 100 200 300 400 500 GRAPHIC SCALE \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ S21 '$4'40"E [ 5~ 0 \ 410.00' 55 LOCATION MAP / / / / Pre-Development Runoff Coefficient: 30.00 % {light vngets~on) Post-Development Runoff Ceefffcerd: 32.2 % ~oil Classification: See test hole Receiving Waters: Low paint on slfe POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES In aaaordancs with the provisions of the USEPA General Permit, stsrm water management and erosion and sndrment control measures Including, but not limited to, 61e fo~l~vtsg s~l be employed during construction: A. Existing vegetation to remain shall be protected (by Installation of constmcrthn fence or ether approved means) and shall remain undisturbed, B ClearJl3g and Grading shall be sehedutsd so as to mtstmlze tse extent of exposed areas and the length of time that areas are expasnd. A maximum of 5 acme shall be dlstsd~ed at one time unless wrlttsn permission Is granted by the NYSDEC. Graded and sffippnd areas shell be kept sfeblllzed through the use of temporary sending as required. Seed mixtures shalJ be in accordance with the soft conversation service recommendations. C. Bare soils shall be seeded withts 14 days of exposure, unless conshuc0on will begin within 21 days as sections are completed, or If construclthn on an area Is suspended, the ama shall be seeded Immedietsly. a. Seed preparation - scarify soil If c~mpactsd, remove debds and obsflclles such as roots and stumps b. Soil Amendments 1. Lime ts ph 6.0 SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: TOTAL SITE AREA: VINEYARD: NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC t 000-35-01-24 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC ZONING: R-80 FLOOD: Zone "X" ZONE SURVEYOR: Peconlc Surveyors 1230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. 49618 DATED:1993 w/update OCTOBER 21, 2009 VINEYARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL SPDES - GENERAL PERMIT el 0911 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY:Ns DATE: DECEMBER 22, 2010 SCALE: 1" = lOO'-O" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SWPPP SHEET NO.: SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA,e~4 5F (NET) TOI[~-'I' MAIN ENIt~Y MA 4 TA~TIN~ GRUSHIN~ PAD BELOV~ FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Flla.~T PLOOt~. AREA, 3402 Si' (~RO~) T In, liN ~U :.TION ,~ REA ~4~U..'.GHI N~, PAD BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" BA~IEMENT AREA: 3402 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL JULY ~q, "~OIO MATEI~..I AL5 * ~I I ND O P',ID OI 1109 DRAWNBY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" SHEET TITLE: FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO: 1 let, EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'~)" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: tl8" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE: tl8" = 1'4)" MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: CEDAR SHINGLES (STAINED) ROOF: STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF DOOR & WINDOWS: MARVIN WINDOWS - ULTREX - WHITE TRIM/CASING VERSATEX TERRACES: BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAl JULY 2'~, 2OIO f'.4A"I"tERI ALe 4~ OI 1109 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE:APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SHEET TITLE: BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHEETNO: EXIT N/O/~ ~o~TO~OSTA 2O SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: t000-35-0%24 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Jemco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 TOTAL SITE AREA: 2,627,976 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. VINEYARD: 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC ZONING: R-80 FLOOD: Zone "X" ZONE SURVEYOR: Peconlc Surveyors 1230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. 49618 DATED:1993 w/update OCTOBER 21, 2009 VINEYARD N/O/F pECONIC LANDING AT soUTHOLD INC. LOCATION MAP I I S21 '05'$0"E Il Il PARKING / / 982.87' 5o N/O/F PECONIC LANDING AT SOUTHOLD INC. / /5O // / / \ 50 ~ ~' ~- / / i ( ~0 S21 '34'40'E 410. OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = 100' LONG ISLAND SOUND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL Ol DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: 1" = 100"0" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NO,: "' .... ' .......[I 1[ PARKINGBAsEMENT F~CALCULATIONS~~ I TO ~ND~OUND ~TO~E TAN~. ~IN ~ ~ONTOU~ ~ ~ .......................... ~ ~.--~-~-~.-~-' /~ II ~ ~ II . ~ ~ - SCALE. I 20 ............ ..... , .... ~.. ........ ... SITE PLAN DATE: APRIl. 14, 2010 SCALE; 1" = 20',-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE GRADING DRAINAGE & LAYOUT PLAN SHEETNO.: ~..-,;,;~ .,_T.. LEED CERIFICATION STANDARDS I~ ~ .~ P~NT LIST (Native Plants) : ,..:... _. ., ,".,:....~'.,-. ¥'.., h ~1~' ~lmmlml ~ ~2.~,~ ,'~':':-- ~,":-" ~~ [ ~1 ~' I[// ~ ~ , ,.,..- ;' ... :. ,v ,., ~ ~ ~~~ ,,.,,,,,,:... ,.,,,. ,...~.. · .... ,,, . ,.,,,, .... .,. , .,,,,.: .... , ........ ~,., .... ,,,..'...,, ,~.'..-, . ,._ ......... . -.x .;.. ., ,. ...... , ~. - ,,, . ..... -,. ....... OVERFLOW PARKINO .' .......... ~ ......... : ..... ' .............. ~-" - ~ .' :, ' ,.. :",'. -v,"-- ".' -.-',~. "',,'.-'"'- '.. ,,:',' ."- :"',' ' ', .>..'~o~.u~-~.~~.::r,".. / · . ..... , .: .., - . ,. : · -,.. . .. ~Ae~H~~..,v.. ~ ~ N~E~ ~.-.. ,,. ,~. - .... : .. -'.. ' .-. --.',, , ~ .. · .~.. - . -. -. .. ~, ..~, ., . ,, ~ '. A~~ I .... .... - ..... . ..... . .... ..... .... . ........... . , ,,, ...... .. ,, , , , : '~ ~. OI SHEET TITLE: SITE LANDSCAPIN( & LIGHTING PLAN pi × × ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'ARD ~ ~ ':.."..'.~.'"-...:-::'v ..'~. '~ ":' ~.'..' .'"-t::~"..:.' ":~N :.*~F~f:':.L'L.: ~,~.Z~ / t I/ ~ ~ ~'~' ~ ~ '. --'-.'~ '" ~ :. ." ?-'~' '~,~: ''?'-'- ,'...,-*-..-.'-,..~.*:: ~.':::~.~..*'7 ~ ~~ ~ / ~ ~ .~ ' ~~ ~o~ ~ ~ , .,~'"',:: "' ':.:' ~'~'~ :'~'.T"f. ' : "?' ~V::~:~.'.j~.:.~**. ~Z ~~: .'.'" ,:~,~.Z_~ - · / ~ ~ ::~.....:~ ~ ~u~ ~ ~ .... -'. ::.::~'?:.-',.~.',,.,..,,.'~::::;.,:'.'L:".:,~;,~.: .'..?.~r.,:':'.~'.~:',.."~~:'''''" ~ ~ .~.~,', ... x.:', ~'~ '~.:.~',.....~/ ~ ~ " .... -."* ' ..... .'". **' ":..'"*. *'- .... '*" ~ % .:Z~* .. -.~;. :~-~ ' ;~ . .. ~ ~" ...' :.' t..::,:"- , '..:.',',.., v: L ,,. '*,':" :-"*'.': ' ~ ~ ,, .... ., ~ A~, ."'..: ...:...- ~ . .',.":.:..,.'..... .... , ....... . .... ~ .. ..... .... ... ...... / . : : E PLAN 2" tOWN OF SOUTHOLD Sff~ PLAN APPROVAL I/E,"/'ft. Ir=. +IB.Oj I' HIN. 2' HAX. SOLID EXPAN510I POOL WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WINERY NO SCALE TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL WASTE WATER SYSTEM SETTLEMENT TANK - 1200 GALLON N.T.S. WASTE WATER SYSTEM WASTE WATER CALCULATIONS WASTE WATER PROCESSING WINE PRODUCTION AREA WASH DOWN OF WINE MAKING EQUIPMENT 395 GPD TOTAL WASTE WATER PROCESSING 395 GPD WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: WASTE WATER SYSTEM - 395 GPD 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 398 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 790 GAL (1) 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 4 FT LD) 2.LEACHING POOLS 395 GPD 1 1.5 SF I GPD= 263 SF USE 10 FT DIA x 10 FT I-IT POOL (LP) EFFECTIVE DEPTH (10 FT. DIA. X 9.67 FT. HT.) = 303.6 S.F. PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 10 FT DIA x 10 FT HT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: PARKING AREA DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR (DWI"A" 14,662 SF. X (2/12 FT.) X 0.9--2, tll CU. FT. USE: {4) 8' DIAMETER x 12' HIGH POOL (4) 6' X 12' STORM DRAIN RING = 2,026 CU. FT. USE: (4) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (4) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 216 CU. FT. 2,242 CU. FT. > 2, tll CU. FT. CRUSHING / LOADING AREA DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR (DWI "B" 3,545 SF. X (2112 FT.) X 0.9 = 511 CU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGN POOL (2) 6' X 6' STORM DRAIN RING = 507 CU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (2) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 108 CU. FT. EJ~QY~F,Q REQUIRED 615 CU. FT. > 5tl CU. FT. ROOF STRUCTURE RAIN WATER ON ROOF AREA TO BE DIRECTED TO UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS. RAIN WATER WILL BE USED FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION. LEED CERTIFICATION STORAGE AREA X RAINFALL TANK 3,803 SF. X (2/12 FT.) = 609 CU. FT. (TK) "C" USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL (2) 6' X 6' SOLID WALL RING = 507 CU. FT. USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (2) 8' SOLID WALl.. DOMES = 108 CU. FT. ROAD ENTRY/CURB CUT AREA DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR (DWI "D" 1,576 SF. X (2/12 FT.) X 0.g = 237 CU. FT. USE: (1) 8' DIAMETERx 6' HIGH POOL (1) 8' X 6' STORM DRAIN RING = 253 CU. FT. USE: (1) 8' DIAMETER SOLID WALL DOMES (1) 8' SOLID WALL DOMES = 54 CU. FT. 307 CU. FT, > 237 CU. FT. FF EL ~4.0 IE. +2-1.4-/ IE. +;25.5 I/4"/FT. FT. I/B"/PT, 5~PTIC, TAN~. SEPTIC PROFILE FOR WINERY NO SCALE TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL SEPTIC SYSTEM SANITARY CALCULATIONS I. ALLOWABLE DENSITY TOTAL ACERAGE: 39.78 ACRES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER ALLOWABLE DENSITY: 39.78 Acres x 600 GPD.= 23,868 GPD. SITE DENSITY CALCULATION WINERY: 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPDIOccupant) 5 GPD X 98 Occupants = 490 GPD 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPD/SF) 0.06 GPD X 1,498 SF = 89.9 GPD 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0,04 GPD/SF) 0.04 GPD X 3,147 SF = 125.9 GPD 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPD/SF) 0.03 GPD X 565 SF = 16.9 GPO TOTAL SITE DENSITY FLOW = 722.7 GPD PROJECT NOT OVER DENSITY TOP OF POOL N~ 25.41 F~OOL E~rT OF POOL 1~.41 PT, IL SANITARY DESIGN SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: WINERY: 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD+ 2.5 GPDIOccupant) 7.5 GPD X 98 Occupants = 735 GPD 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) 0.06 GPD X 1,498 SF = 89.9 GPD 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) 0.04 GPO X 3, t47 SF = 125.9 GPD 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPD/SF) 0.03 GPD X 565 SF = 16.9 GPD SEWAGE FLOW = 982.7GPD TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 967.7 GPO 10. SANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTR SEPTIC SYSTEM - 967.7 GPD 1.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 967.7 GPD X 2 DAY FLOW = 1,935.4 GAL USE MINIMUM: 2,000 GAL SEPTIC TANK (10 FT DIA X 4 FT LD) 2.GREASE TRAP (GT) USE MINIMUM: (8 FT DIA X 5 FT LD) 3. LEACHING POOLS ( LP ): 967.71 1.5 S.F.IGPD = 645.1 S.F. USE MINIMUM ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 9 FT. NT.) EFFECTIVE DEPTH ( 3 ' 8 FT. DIA. X 8.67 FT. NT.) = 650.25 S.F. PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 2 - 8 FT DIA X 9 FT HT INLET OUTLET SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON ..T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM OUTLET GREASE TRAP SEPTIC SYSTEM TEST H O L E_ NO SCALE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1197~ TEST HOLE DATA ( 4J6/20t 0) 1FT. DARK BROWN LOAM OL 3 FT. BROWN SILT ML 4 FT. BROWN SILTY SAND W/20% GRAVEL SM BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND SW SITE DATA SCTM # PROPERTY: OWNER: TOTAL SITE AREA: 1000-35-01-24 825 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 temco Realty Associates, LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 2,627,975 SQ. FT. = 60.33 AC. 895,158 SF = 20.55 AC VINEYARD: NON PLANTED: 1,732,817= 39.78 AC ZONING: FLOOD: ZONE SURVEYOR: APR 14 ~OlO R-80 Zone "X" Peconlc Surveyom 1230 Traveler St. Southold, NY 11971 LICENCE NO. X DATED:1993 w/update OCTOBER 21, 2009 VINEYARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL BI DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 SCALE: NO SCALE SHEET TITLE: DETAILS/ ALCULATION SHEET NO: S SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: t/8" [] 1'-0" MAIN TA~TIN~ ,BAR A~A BELOi~I FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAL OI DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS 14, 2010 SHEET TITLE: FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO: 1 2nd ~L TOP SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1%0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'~" EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'4)" WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'~)" MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: "HARDI REVEAL PANEL" ROOF: STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WIINDOWSlDOORS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM TRIM/CASING VERSATEX TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A - WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPROVAl OI CHECKED BY: NS DATE: APRIL 14, 2010 BUILDING !LEVATIONS SHEET NO: