Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-75.-5-14.1 SITE INFORMATION: ZONE: R-50 LATITUDE: N 410 02' 21.00" NAD 55 AOLIFAOL LON611UDE: N -120 21' 50.81" NAD 8B D E S I G N GROUND ELEVATION: 16' AM5L (NAVD88) EXISTIN6 USE: "B" BUSINESS AND "U" UTILITY GROUP z PROP05ED USE: SAME USE, NO GHAN6EroC et P ® A R C H I T E C T U R E E NGINEERING LOT SIZE: 561,442.115F / 13.01 ACRES New York, L. L.C. : 160 5Q. PT. , O. BOX 3 TOTAL LEASE AREA HAZLETNEW JERSEY 07730 DRAWING; LI &T: T: 732 . 888 . 6210 F: 732 . 847 . 4335 SHEET # DESCRIPTION: T-I TITLE SHEET Z-I RADIUS MAP 4 5URROUNDIN6 INFORMATION Z-2 517E PLAN 4 ZONING INFORMATION SITE # : N Y7 315 Z-3 PARTIAL 517E 4 EQUIPMENT PLAN Z-4 TOWER ELEVATION 4 DETAIL5 Z-5 DETAILS 41405 ROUTE 25 CONTACTS: (A. K.A. 185 PECONIC LANE) 517E CONTACT: TOWN LD R P E C O N I C NY 11958 s 289 N 53015 ROUTEUTE 25 25 SOUTHOLD, NY 11811 Lou ' oom ,AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. OWNER INFORMATION: Pi POLICE DEPARTMENT ARCEnrEcr STRUCTURAL ENGINEER P41515 ECONIG,N 1115 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NJ-#02992-1 36209 PEGONIG, NYIIg58 NY-#oze99z-2 NY-#075384 APPLICANT: METRO F05 NEW YORK, L.L.G. THI5 DOCUMENT le THE DE516N, PROPERTY 4 5 SKYLINE DRIVE GOPYRI5HT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND FOR THE EXOLU5IVE U5E 5Y THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN ATTORNEY: RE, NIELSEN, HUBER 4 COU6HLIN, LLP GON5ENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROH1eITED. 56 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE HUNTIN6TON, NY 11145 SECTION ■ 75 BLOCK ■ 5 LOT :■ 4 ■O 14 . 001 TEL. (651) 425-4100 FAX. (651) 425-4104 UJO K: ZON E : R-80 D SCOPE O� � - INSTALLATION OF (4) EQUIPMENT CABINET5 ON NEW CONCRETE SLAB. - INSTALLATION OF (6) PANEL ANTENNAS ON NEW MOUNTS TO EXI5TIN6 TOWER. - INSTALLATION OF GABLE BRIDGE FOR ROUTING COAXIAL GABLES TO TOWER 01/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS - INSTALLATION OF COAXIAL GABLES UP THE TOWER TO THE ANTENNAS. - INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR EQUIPMENT - INSTALLATION OF CHAIN LINK FENCE AND ACCESS SATES. 08/18/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS - INSTALLATION OF LAND5CAPIN6 SGREENIN6 AROUND PROPOSED FENCED EQUIPMENT KEY MAP: SCALE: I"=1000' (11x11) _ TOPOGRAPHIC MAP: SCALE: I"=1000' (11x11) � ' REV15ION uV/ SCALE: I"=500 (22X54) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION COMPOUND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCALE: 500' (22x34) ■w1A TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ,e _ -- _ �r - 'tlllfi i , IiV 1 ` �.sa VV I'uI „r1diN= ' IIII nyn,a191 .k"rfFr , Kd �?=�Xf" „ � -_ t ,,, .,d41r. �o-1 1i4 �- .,lo, `r_,IIh Illn'+"I� �,,,;�_ �IInII : ,,,I=I I, :I �- +J =- '.^ �- 7 :)' .: �''�_ - T''_*tv. -."J}. ,' _- , _ }I�I, fl lI _ I Y,1� 1I111 11 CLIENT. NOT �- �.� - x '�,— -- - 19�,.;. _�i - -'a'd � lu - 'v< E Ik1,ILiI,LIVjI I�Ir �i,Jlff IkIII.V 1111 I .I �pl,ir,p . n Ili::� '1 IIiI � VIII f .I ;r 11pll 'iY .Pf I111p�''il�@ _�� , ',l� - - "C - ^'E-� - - d v �—_ 11' - r IIIIIII III �:. .�,'�? _ .,. �. :_@,_ y 1&n>%.:,, l< _+�6 -,; III�II £ DARDS AND SPEGIFIGATIONS OF THE TOWN OF - _ y � _- - -- -- ._ >u� ., _. II ,�_,, l,l ��q�l I, pI�I Irul •- G1 - L) CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM TO THE STAN �� _^ ,I ,� . - - 14_- I 1 I� _ IM f _ - tory .,- _ . . - — E, uI�P ! ._J i, ___ II - , - i - ;.i - _- xmr<,x' l'^-.� — �IS:I - '� 7 � Y f e "_ - ,:=1110 a, i IYti I 1 , - _ __� Cn� T :-� I .i 4h11 I .' �°_- I l p�li'' !-_I 1 31��q,�-1 _ I r SOUTHOLD. „� �s � � I, V, p p'I q , r�, - 11 f s - eVl]III 5 L „- _14, "t _ __ ' - 'ate r „ __, 4v11, 1 9Y �ry19 2. THE PROPOSED COMPOUND IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY AND THEREFORE NO PARKINS HAS ^ �_ frr4 � ''�� _ '",t �'"'°I” r�,F I' - � aII metr PCS r � -- r_� _ 'L .,._r �►RPl�iOX111l�ATE, =- �ppll�fll � II�II'illa, ;;I I rn,�1 ru' BEEN PROVIDED. - �, � �.nur @Em w, _ - � - dl l_� " stiff- '„111'1 II II � II' f .r I to 11111ilI;,II f, :, Ir_' � ., � ” o �Ir..E CIG AClN! I� ,{ 711 ,w -, V_ . z=w -" _ F, —�_� , s ft � i_-_—�_ t TuI Ill � 141,.i ,i ,, I - Ill- .� , I New York L.L.C. `"''�- -'-`' -�.� -�-a�;>„ �--- -- i_ . �E � � I�,n..'"I�I - - - ' - -. __ P II. ,��'", la �,: _ - s DOES NOT REQUIRE A PERMANENT EMPLOYEE , �_ . -_„}. .�� s � I�s� � ,`#fie__ ��- .� - 1_, II . - � �_ I I11IV, �I p f �' ., 3.) THE PROPOSED MOBILE EQUIPMENT � a � _ -� 1 r l _. = ,t I I . hI,IIIIVI,-, G II I lr,„@ ,-y ."� .' ' � 9� 1 �hI1al ��I�i �I Ir.__. r VIII„ OCCUPANCY, IT 15 AN UNMANNED FACILITY, AND THEREFORE REQUIRES NO POTABLE NATER, .� = �„ t,a, �, ,�, , -� �1, _ —�,� ,—,_ , 1 �,�1- -- -_- • I„t " .= III ,III 111_=- �,Y I III-J. Q .—� ii,! 6I SANITARY SEWERS AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL 517E PARKIN ��� ff _ -_,f , � 3, L .1nI :-_ �,7I !�1 -s- 1 .�--� _ 1 _ .m?P;, _ - !;bs f r, :I, �I _ ,� 'l' „�,p :,.:,_ _ 1� III V :o =' - al OUR TO 51X WEEK PERIOD FOR � i-� __, .� "_. - = - i. ar �I fr-., I ,II E p 4I, rl,::= _ y ,,, -, n - ',-,uq h - "� !I _ 4. THIS SITE WILL BE VISITED ON AN AVERAGE EVERY F _ - F:� „r��€ I. '� I ���. 1 1-r„ 11 e I ,a+- r. � 11 IIII,I VI 9 � r 1P . . - ':::::':::::• t'� .. 54 e_ ,1 � i`i�F., _ -`: -'L-� „�� 9rY-, :t4 21 !N+! __ 5 CLIENT PROJECT #. MAINTENANCE AND SHALL BE MONITORED FROM A REMOTE FACILITY. ���. � 5) THIS PROPOSED 517E ONLY REQUIRES ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE UTILITIES. CONNECTIONS _ x -�� ' _�'iI I ��- , , u'I , IrIC,F_: a.�,Id�I —°-a��-�-'_41I-11,11I_11 a.,u.l,1(_��� F , _Ip.. _ f u !��_ • ', p SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY UPON APPROVAL. � S -=: _ : NY755 UA TIMER 5WITGH BY 6. SITE LIGHTING WILL BE REQUIRED. PROP05ED WORK LIGHT ON MANUAL - - -� - __ u=: p{ e:1I`"'�� ' a ) mill � 'Pe11�1 �k mak_ NemY�.t � - _ _ -, F-,I� di' � ��ll_d ir. vn�imll� III� �z I� � �9� 91 11�i -_` _ r� _ _ _ II -fl , 1�JV�I I�'] ,J�I ' SITE ADDRESS. EQUIPMENT. �-_� h II L. - SS, - u I40� ROUTS � S 5 OF MUNICIPAL AND AGENCY �� - �__- , - .14 I , ra, , n I 1--.:_ .,_,,, 4 b PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE ,_ ,- �� � �IqF' I 1111 � � I I ds--� , I 1.) THESE DRAWINGS ARE REIN =_ -�„e� � _ ,:_,�91I1 IP�,a�. 1VVB �I� p 1 , Ill, .�f. a L1 , �t�I � , _ ,P:.� - - _— lE,'_ _-J: ��6 Id, - _ 1. _— n, ,,::}ppry�Wp:�d4 '� I �- lII 1 ll NOT BE UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION — _ - 9_ - -- �- -_ - T, 3 I ,,� - - � . .., ,� REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THESE DRAWINGS SHALL �� ��--- ,' m- _ IIII - -' LL��� - IIIIII �- ' SATISFIED. __ -� � - �. Ilr� { •,_ I III @.� I,�,�� I,I � . .�. I ,IIPII � I I 5E5 UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN PURPO L �_ � '1 r �II ' !a , � � �f,�IIN:, -_ ! � rx , 11111 „ p ' 1` ��i, I I��, V u °�_ I ,,;� uF� ` 11111 1 � , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �__� _ � � pl'� � I°�V��Y�� � Ir- � - � _ to ,I{I � ��I��IR�1 �V���I "I" I. � 'I��1,�I II �!_ i IC-;N ,4TI.I �!_ OCK: �—_ _ — ill � Ik ,1 �11,n n 1111 =.1119�I111III��IIIIn11 nla; n ,r DRAWING TITLE. TEO?UNDEIt91GNED,PUR9UAM TO SOUTHGLD TOWN CUDE SECAN 100-1 ACKNOLEDOEO THAT THE CONDITIONS OP THESITE PLAN m NAME D sescoHomaNSDNRoL TOWN CHAIRMAN: Al!ACCEDATE T TL— -7 FlA8 O 1�J10 — '� __ `•-rl „ P' - I� TOWN SECRETARY: "'r"10 Are DATE Al 111 11311 1 1 O' 1000' 1500' 2000' DRAWN BY, SHEET NUMBER: CONSTRUCTION OF IGIAL 'W , A,Xpi DATE DGa " stm A nT� "TE G EG BY. lin TOWN EN61NEER: a pedod of tbOi yew from the d■te of■pprovel m per DATE DATE. 08/18/10 � °f 6 MTM O�fMPST5008 SEC BLK LOT ZONE PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS \ RES. 74 5 15 R-80 JILL BLUM PO BOX 151, PECONIC NY 11958 75 1 13 R-80 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PO BOX 1179 53095 ROUTE 25,SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 1 0755 75 1 14 B LAJIBRDA LLC 53 NORTHWEST DR, NORTHPORT,NY 11768 1 75 1 15.2 R-80 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PO BOX 1179 53095 ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 12 75 1 15.3 R-80 ML MAIN ROAD LLC 770 PARK AVE UNIT 188, NEW YORK NY 10021 D E S I G N " 75 1 15.4 R-80 ML MAIN ROAD LLC 770 PARK AVE:UNIT 18A, NEW YORK,NY'0021 75 5R-80 PO BOX 151 PECONIC NY 11958 2 S GROUP z / 75 5 2 R-80 STEVEN EVENSYGMAN &MARIA PO BOX 121 PECONIC NY 11958 75 5 3 R-80 STELLA SAKOWIC PO BOX 173, PECONIC,NY 11958 / 75 5 4 R-80 IALICE MALINAUSKAS PO BOX 13/585 PECONIC LANE, PECONIC NY 11958/ A R C H I T E C T U R E SCHOOL 75 5 5 R-80 SOPHIE ANDRADE PO BOX 3 505 PECONIC LANE, PECONIC, NY 11958 076 75 5 6 R-80 MARINA TSOKANOS,STEVEN & ELAINEI<OKKINOS PO BOX 229 PECONIC NY 11958 ENGINEERING ,� \ 1 75 5 7 R-80 ELAINE LATHAM PO BOX 264 PECONIC NY 11958 500 RADIUS LINE 75 5 9 B DAVIDLAFRENIERE 910 TUTHILL ROAD EXT,SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 7T P. O. BOX 3 AGR. 13 75 5 10 8 LILEMILY ROSE COP. 41965 IT 25, PECONIC, NY11958 HALLET' NEWJERSEY07730 I `b� 074 75 5 11 B EUGENE G &MARY ELLEN GRIMES 41705 RT 25 PO BOX 503 PECONIC,NY .958 15 ;jWILLIAM \ 75 5 12 B SLAMA CHARLES REV TRUST 45 PRINCE'S PINE RD NORWALK CT06850 T: 732 . 888 . 6210 75 5 13 B BERRY&BERRY LLC 41535 RT 25 PECONIC NY 11958 586 1 3.1 AC PHYLLIS CATALANO 45 COLD STREET FARMINGDALE NY 117-3 F: 732 . 847 . 4335 86 1 3.3 AC B&J REALITY PO BOX 198 PECONIC NY 11958 86 1 3.4 AC B&1 REALITY PO BOX 198 PECONIC NY 11958 APPROVED BY AGR86 1 4.27 R-40 RICHMOND SHORES PROP,OWNER ASSOCIATION PO BOX 273 PECONIC NY 11958086 86 1 4.29 R-40 RICHMOND SHORES PROP.OWNER ASSOCIATION PO BOX 273 PECONIC NY 11958 PLANNING BOARD 1 - - - -- ---- ---- ------------------ 86 1 4.4 R-40 DANIEL P BEISNER&JEANEEN PO BOX 292 315 RICHMOND LANE, PECONIC, NY 11958 AGR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 3.3 & KARRIANN SEI FERT, a �° 86 1 4.5 R-40 GEORGE& MARGURERITE DENGEIL 345 RICHMOND LANE PECONIC NY 11958 DATE I ® o F:::6 5 86 1 4.6 R-40 THOMAS&CLAUDIA FERRAJIULO 350 RICHMOND LANE PECONIC NY 11958 /7 O 1.1 I I 86 1 6.1 RAG GREGORY C WESTERLUND 41640 RT 25, PECONIC NY 11958 I ! I 86 1 6.2 R-40 ADOLPH WESTERLUND&THERSA A. 41700 RT 25 PECONIC,NY 11958 ` ' REG CENTER I 8fi 1 7 R-40 SCOTT DESIMONE MEUSSAI HYATT-DESIMONS 41780 RT 25, PECONIC NY 11958 '7- �/ ,C PED GI I 075 86 1 8 R-80 THOMAS D.GRATTAN JR. PO BOX 465 PECONIC NY 11958 l a C9 \`'MOO�C�' I R-801 86 1 9.1 R-80 PELLEGRINI PECONIC LLC 23005 RT 25 CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 I m 075 r RE5 86 1 9.3 R-80 PELLEGRINI PECONIC LLC 23005 RT 25,CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 iRESIDENTIAL LOW 5 I I 15.2 86 1 10.9 R-80 ZIP PECONIC WELLS LLC 1717 5TH AVE:FLOOR 19 NEW YORK,NY 10022 I DENSITY (2 ACRES) 02 - I I 86 1 15 AC HERODOTUS DAMI ANOS 591-A BICYCLE PATH PT JEFFERSON, NY 11776 8 HON NOTE. 14 I 075 I SURROUWDING PROPERTY OWNER Lou Moglino,AIA Robert W.Toms,P.E. 5 INFORMATION WAS UPDATED ON ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I 03 11E5. JULY 12, 2010 FROM TOWN OF N GE 36209 SOUTHOLD TAX REGORDS NY-#0289921 IR '#9 #075384 I ' 075 I I THIS DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY F AGR. AGR, ' I 6 t �7 i7 b ` � I G COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND 066 RES ✓SL 0 RA U S FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT ANY 086 04 AGR I I I 'f� t DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN I 1 1 086 I ' 0 075 I I F�OfEIfT� OLU./NE I�.6 � 15 I CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 15 I 3.4 3.1 075 1 Ilxll SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 24x36 56ALE: O.` 005 RE5 �, 15.4 I I AC 055 / RES. 075 iC-PJC ADRICULTURAL CONSERVATION 14.1OI O 06 a RE5I0ENTIAL LOW I I I2 ACRES O i DENSITY (2 ACRES) I �f TOWNSHIP OF I RES. 075 I L75 O R300 I I ❑ ❑ SOUTHOLD HWY \ _ - 07 _ _ - �g 09/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS C) � DEPARTMENT � ,_011 ,� I A\ 08/18/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS I GENERAL 1111111 ❑ REV. DATE REVISION I � BUSINESS -\ / II O 075 ZONE I DEscRIPrION I ' 1 CLIENT: 14 r 075 - GAR I ! i 5 p55 DEALERSHIP / I I 13 12 LLL���J ; metroPCS i WINDOW I GARNETTREATP`�ENT - ------ New York L.L.C. GLEANING VACANT BUSINESSBUSYNESS � 075 e I BU51NE55 LAND ❑ 1 /A GLA55 p75 15.3 I -- --- O 055 075 O 09 �p� AGR. 5 CLIENT PROJECT #: ---------J 11 _ 1 / NY1315RT 25/MAIN ROAD (EXIST. SCENIC BYWAY I ) - SITE ADDRESS: RES 41405 ROUTE � � / Ras \ °° ° oes RO O O obs RES O / FE N I G , NY 1 1 �i 5a \ 1 4.29 086 8 086 0. / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4.4 1 �61 086. RERE. O 9.1 0 / DRAWING TITL O RE5 L 1 086 R-80 b 0 ATR. 086 6.2 7 RESIDENTIAL LOW 086 / RADIUS MAP $ SURROUNDING 1 DENSITY (2 ACRES) 1 4.5 FP,--470 10.9 2 1 N F fz;Z-' T I O N - � / 086 RESIDENTIAL LON 500 ' R,4DlUj/ VICINITY/ <EY MAF 1 DENSITY ( ACRES) / I DRAWN BY. SHEET NUMBER. 086 <� 4.6 VAGANT LAND AGR / 24xIlxll 5GALE: I" =200'_0' DGa 24X36 SCALE: " = 100'-0" CHECKED BY: 417 086 086 0' 200' 300' 400' DPMO _4.27 9.3 / / �� 08/18/10 -- �_ MTM PROJECT #: OgMPST5008 _ ,,,,� 11 II II ZONING INrOfRMA`fiION R-80 ITEM REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT �t 2 �&IF�& MIN. LOT AREA 80,000 S.F. 561,44217 5.F. NO GHAN6E u ¢ T MIN. LOT WIDTH 175 FT 53q.76 FT. NO GHAN6E Q Q ^ w D E S I G N MIN. LOT DEPTH 250 FT 1020.47 FT, NO CHANGE z w O T V T Z MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (ANTENNA) 100 FT. N/A 1012.75 FT. Q } LOT: I5 MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (EQUIPMENT) 100 FT. q1.0 FT. 188.83 FT. } w Q w ° A R C H I T E C T U R E MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK ONE 20' FT. N/A 6q.3 FT. Q o w o ENGINEERING (ANTENNA) TOTAL 45' FT. N/A 458.11 FT. I m p P. O. BOX 3 MIN. SIDE YARD 5ETBAGK ONE 20' FT. 12.25 FT. 14.83 FT. o p (EQUIPMENT) TOTAL 45' FT. 16.55 FT. 420.41 FT. Z-3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 T: 732 . 888 . 6210 MIN. REAR YARD 5ETBKAG (ANTENNA) 75' FT. N/A 20.1 FT. 2 MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (EQUIPMENT) 75 FT. 10.0 FT. e 50.87 FT. gNTEN � PR E F: 732 . 847 . 4335 MIN. LANDSCAPE AREA 25% 8.68% Q 8.61% —I K MAX. LOT COVERAGE 20% 5.11% 5.q3% _ cE ) ARD TOPROPERND I APPROVED MAX. BUILDING HE16HT / STORIES 35 FT. / 2 1/2 145 FT - 92.25 FT - TOP OF LINE) WNNING BOARR D EXISTING TOWER ANTENNA LOT: TOWN F SOUTHOLD ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMUNICATION5 TOWER, PER TOWNSHIP CODE ARTICLE XVII, SECTION5 280-61 - 260-51, 574:_O + n / DATE ARE A5 FOLLOWS: -� MAX. HEIGHT 80 FT. 145 FT. MAX. EQUIPMENT AREA 500 SQ. FT. N/A 180 50. FT. (PROPOSED E420.41' SIDE YARD 6-5" 3 KEY: © EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY N/A NON APPLICABLE — M> NTGOMPOUND Tp pROPSR� LINE LOT• 2 Lor. 152 I ) 899ti�oQ 44.83' SIDE 02 - NO BOUNDARY SURVEY HAS PERFORMED. (PR YAR LOT:3.2 I I OPvgEDEQUIPMENT E �A / E of TO BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE ; -_APROPERTY LI OUND 'u Lou Moglino,AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. AND TAKEN FROM THE FOLLOWING: I ) LOT: 5 SECTION: Oa6 ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ-#AI 13345 NJ-#GE 36209 - A DRAWING TITLED 51TE PLAN, PREPARED BY B LOT.5— I SE 64.3' SIDE YARD Iry N NY-#028992-1 NY-#075384 JOHN GALLAGHER DATED OCTOBER 30, 2003. ( ANTEN�q Tr- (PROPOSED p, I� TH15 DOCUMENT 15 THE OF516N, PROPERTY - A DRAWING TITLED SITE PLAN, PREPARED FOR PROPERT COPYRIGHT EX of EXCLUSIVE MTM DESIGN GROUP, EN ° AND AN w I Y LINE) I FOR THE TION O VE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT ANY NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS BY WILLIAM F. z DUPLICATION Or THE OR EA OR 15 5 ExPREss wRi 51T COLLINS A.I.A. ARGHITEGT5, 1212 TECHNOLOGY ! LOT: 4 cONSENr OF THe cREnrOR is srRicrEY PRONIeiTE� DRIVE, 5ETAUKET, NY 11733 DATED 10/06/q5. o� - 51TE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY THE MTM v O I m PF-516N GROUP INC. AT SITE V151T ON 4.14.01 4 r ; 00 SECTION: 5 �/p BLOCK: 5 LOT: 14.1 O LOT: 5 Im I ' I 0 q O m LOT: 15.4 A :z I u w z ; LOT: 6 z w w I g 09/02/10 RE-ISSUED A5 PRILIMINARYS a in w ! ( 08/18/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARY5 mmw sw = -_ w O w ; REV. DATE REVISION pIr __ 256 LOT: 7 DESCRIPTION U1 f ` 0 ' O C - --� 55$'56 pOnE Q) CLIENT oZ D- I _ F 11 :z I EXI°�TIN6 BUILDING LL- Q q -� ; W metroPCS ry U1 0 o EX15Tw6 BUILDING ;w New York, L.L.C. N ro ( — 344.84' CLIENT PROJECT ri: NCO Iw �n LOT: 14 NY-7315 SITE ADDRESS: �'� LOT. 13 m a a — — — 41405 �OUT� ryl• LOT: 12 LOT: 11 N/� 9 �' 152.84 5 48' 0 `3O= PI=GONIG , NY II �f58 ;U) ❑ N/o �o Lor: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD g LOT. 10 DRAWING TITLE: If 81.64' I'n N 11 lo' oo° E 17.00' sae'�9 sow T 1— hl MAIN ROAD ZONING INFORINIATION LOT: 4.2q LOT. 6.1 LOT: 6.2 LOT: 7 / LOT: B SECTION: 086 DRAWN BY: SHEET NUMBER. / BLOGK: I DGG7 LOT: q.lLOT: 101 CHECKED BY: SITE PLAN PATE. Z Ixl7 SCALE: I" = 150'-011 08/18/10 MTM PROJECT #. 24x56 SCALE: I" = 15'-0" O�fMPST5008 �� 0: P KEY NOTES: OE = PROPOSED ELECTRIC ROUTED OVERHEAD FROM EXISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) &IFA4&— EXISTING UTILITY POLE #259 TO NEW METRO TRO POLE IN COMPOUND OG = GROUND TO PROP05ED GROUND D E S I G N U RING AROUND NEW EQUIPMENT EXISTING EQUIPMENT COMPOUND GROUP z OT = EXISTING TELCO FROM EXISTING (BY OTHERS) GSC CABINET ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING NOTE: EXISTING 131' 6" HIGH SELF � P. O. BOX 3 ANY DISPLACED 501E FOR PROPOSED SUPPORTING LATTICE TOWER INSTALLATION OF METRO PG5 EQUIPMENT HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 MUST REMAIN ON 51TE AND CAN NOT BE T: 732 . 888 . 6210 REMOVED FROM PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. F: 732 . 847 . 4335 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE \ `\ APPROVED BY i EXISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED METRO PGS PANEL PLANNING BOARD ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPOSED METRO P65 PANEL SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON NEW `\ ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES DATE 1 U SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON NEW MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOWER ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES LE65 (SEE 2/Z-4 FOR DETAILS) `vy � , d MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOWER r/ LEGS (SEE 2/Z-4 FOR DETAILS) X XGT C� EXISTING 131'-6" HIGH SELF c J�Q SUPPORTING LATTICE PROP05ED METRO P65 COAXIAL TOWER GABLES ROUTED UP TOWER ON GABLE LADDER 15'-0" CHAIN LINK FENCE Lou Moglino,AIA Robert W. s, P.E. STR EXISTING EQUIPMENT NJR#AI 13345 NJ#GE ER 36209 SHELTER (BY OTHERS) EXISTING A6GE55 GATE – NY-#028992-I NY-#075384 r 6" 14'-0" CONCRETE SLAB 6" - \ THIS DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY 6 _ COPYRIGHT "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC " AND PROP05ED METRO P65 COAXIAL GABLES ROUTED ALONG NEW GABLE FOR THE OlvE BY THE TITLE CLIENT ANY DUPLICATIONTION LU OR USEE W WITHOUT EXPRESS RITTEN CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED BRIDGE PROPOSED METRO PGS GPS UNIT d 1 1 MOUNTED TO GABLE BRIDGE `9 Lu u ATST SUPPORT P05T (SEE DETAIL 3/Z-4) – I Z4 I T-MOBILE EXISTING 6' NIGH CHAIN LINK \ FENGE W/ BARBED WIRE \ I 2 PROPOSED TELCO ROUTED UNDER— r Z-3 EXISTING SURFACE FROM EXISTING 09/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS O 65G CABINET TO PROPOSED ' O I COMPOUND (VERIFY WITH TOWN ° NEXTEL --- OI REQUIREMENTS) v / �q 08/18/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS OO � _I ° REVISION ---- _ 0 RV. ATE _ _ DE5GRIPT ION O i O - -O CLENT I : l PROPOSED ELECTRIC ROUTED u OVERHEAD FROM EXISTING u \ VERIZON UTILITY POLE #259 TO NEW METRO PGS POLE IN COMPOUND o m a metroPCS . PROPOSED UTILITY POLE _ _ _ _ New York, L.L.C. INSTALLED IN NEW COMPOUND, TO BE COORDINATED WITH — I EXISTING EQUIPMENT UTILITY COMPANY i CLIENT PROJECT SHELTER (BY OTHERS) 6 I - � �. EXISTING PROPANE TANK PROPOSED METRO PG5 6'-0" Z_5 Nl'73 rJ HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH ° EXISTING GENERATOR BARBED WIRE AT TOP \�\ SITE ADDRESS: PROP05ED METRO P65 EQUIPMENT EXISTING CSG CABINET CABINETS (TYP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON - 4 405 f;:, EXISTING UTILITY POLE #259 NEW STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO PEGON I G , NY I I q5B PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB (180 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPOSED METRO P65 EQUIPMENT CABINETS (TYP. 50. FT. LEASE AREA) OF 4) MOUNTED ON NEW STEEL RAIL5 ANCHORED TO PROPOSED 10'x14' CONCRETE SLAB (15'x12'=160 PROPOSED 4'-0" WIDE ACCESS GATE WITH BARBED WIRE AT TOP DRAwM6 TITLE 50. FT. LEASE AREA) (TYP. OF 2), SAFETY 516N NOTICE TO BE PLACED ON FENCE (SEE DETAILS 243/Z-5) S 1 TE= a PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SCREENING AROUND METRO P65 FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, 10'+/- H16H PROPOSED METRO PGS PTO CABINET WITH LIGHT ON POST E=QU I F ME=NT F'LN ARBORVITAE'S OR APPROVED EQUAL (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-4) 2 2 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SCREENING AROUND METRO PGS FENCED EQUIPMENT GOMPOUND, 10'+/- HI6H ARBORVITAES OR APPROVED DRAWN BY: SHEET NUMBER. EQUAL (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-4) DGa GHEGKED BY: P41�� 14� � I �� FLAN TE. �QUI �M�N� i�h>�N DATE. „ 1--1 , I' xll SCALE: ”=37'-�" IIx17 5GALE: SAO" I'-0" 08��8�I0 24x36 SCALE: I" = 15'-�" 24x36 5GALE: 3/8 - I'-� MTM OGMPST5008 f "U10 I I r : 4'_O„ NDATION MODIFICATIONS TO TOWER MUST BE COMPLETEDA4 R TO ADDING ANY EQUIPMENT TO THE EXISTING TOWER. �5'-O P OF t ABOVE GRADE WHIP ANTENNAS klFAW GAMMA D E S I G N z EXISTING SUPER STATIONMASTER ANTENNA SECTOR EXISTING NEXTEL WHIP ANTENNAS (TYPICAL OF 3) EXI5TIN6 131'-6" HIGH SELF G R O U P SUPPORTIN6 LATTICE TOWER TOP OF EXI5TIN6 TOWER 8 CENTER OF A R C HITECTU RE EXISTING PANEL ANTENNAS (ATST) O-0" t ABOVE 6RADE - T E N G I N E E R I N G IE WIDTH OF TOWER 4'-O" P. O. BOX 3 _�AT TOP HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 CENTER OF_EXI5TIN6_ _ANTENNAS (T-MOBILE) EXISTIN6 BEACON LIGHT T: 732 . 888 . 6210 I5'-O"f ABOVE GRADE PROPOSED METRO PG5 PANEL F: 732 . 847 . 4335 _ ANTENNAS (TVP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON ANTENNA SUPPORT EXISTING POLICE WHIP ANTENNAS FRAMES MOUNTED TO EXI5TIN6 TOWER LEG (SEE DETAIL 4/Z-4) ApppoVED BY, +CENTER OF_EXI5TIN6_ANTENNAS (VERIZON) pLpNNING BOARD 100'-6"t ABOVE GRADE TOW/ j OF 5OU7HOLD ET /7 S.�ERE0.4 TOP OF PROP, METRO PC5 ANTENNAS SECTOR 80' DATE ° ALPHA c oma *92-3 f ABOVE GRADE a i� � CENTER OF PROP. METRO PG5 ANTENNAS SECTOR n q0'_-O"f ABOVE GRADE - - - - � v 6 N9T � 20 ANTENNA ORIENTATION FLAN PROP05ED METRO PG5 PANEL ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 Ilxll 56ALE: N.T.S. PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON NEW ANTENNA SUPPORT NOTE: 24x36 SCALE: N.T.S. Lou Mo lino,AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. FRAMES MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOWER LES, EXI5TING ALL EXISTIN6 ANTENNAS ON TOWER ARcz IrECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ANTENNAS TO BE REMOVED MAY NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THI5 NJ-#AI13345 NJ-#GE 36209 VIEW AND MAY NOT BE SHOWN FOR NY-#028992-1 NY-#075384 CLARITY; REFERENCE THE 3" —PROPOSED EXISTING 131'-6' HIGH SELF STRUCTURAL ANALY515 REPORT GPS UNIT COPYRIGHTOr"THE MTM DESIGNNGROUPEwC, " AND SUPPORTING LATTICE TOWER FOR ACTUAL TOWER LOADING, O 01 1-1/4"cP sch. 40 x 16" L6. MIN 55 OR 6ALV. PIPE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT ANr PROPOSED METRO PGS COAXIAL EXISTING AND PROPOSED. 1 DUPLICATION OR USE INITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CABLES ROUTED UP TOWER ON CONSENT OF THE CREATOR IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 02 PLATE I/4 x 4-I/4 x I6-I/4" LG. SALV.(A-36) GABLE LADDER MOUNTING TILT HOLES FOR PROPOSED METRO PGS COAXIAL BRACKET o —ADJUSTMENT O STD. U-BOLT FOR 2"� PIPE W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS PLATE B e AND WASHER, 6ALV. CABLES ROUTED ALONG NEW GABLE 4 BRIDGE (SEE DETAIL 4/Z-5) PROPOSED NUTS O STD. U-Ba AND FOR 2"� PIPE ( DOUBLE HEX PROPOSED METRO PG5 5P5 UNIT MOUNTING MA5T NUTS P1ND WASHER, 6ALV. (SEE NOTE 3) MOUNTED TO GABLE BRIDGE EXISTIN6 6' WHIP ANTENNA GROUND BAR SUPPORT P05T (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-4) Z PROPOSED METRO P05 12' O"x15'-0" FENCED \ , ��� ANT�NNA � TA IL EXISTING WHIP ANTENNA `J g 09/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS COMPOUND WITH FENCE IT METRO PIGS 6-038,-0°LABOVE GRADE HIGH GRAIN LINK FENCE WITH BARBED WIRE AT lxll SCALE. 1/2" = I'-0" ZL 08/16/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS TOP (SEE DRAWING 2/Z-3 FOR DETAILS) ffN 24x36 SCALE: I" = I'-(d" PROPOSED UTILITY POLE INSTALLED IN 6 SPRINT/NEXTEL EQUIPMENTNOT 5HOWN FOR CLARITY. Rev DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION NEW COMPOUND, TO COORDINATED WITH cueNT. UTILTY COMPANY PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA: WIDTH OF TOWER IT-O" KATHREIN MODEL NO. 6mm600-101504 AT BASE Dlmemions EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER (BY OTHERS) Hei6y41 INidthU 6 1/4" 2/2 " metroPCS EXISTING EQUIPMENT EXISTING 6' HI6H CHAIN LINK SHELTER (BY OTHERS) f, fi Depth 2 I/2" FENCE W/ BARBED ARE EXI5TIN6 TOWER FOUNDATION, New York, L.L.C. MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED, SEE NOTE5 THIS SHEET CLIENT PROJECT #: APPROX. GRADE ` NY73I S EXISTING EQUIPMENT—/ SITE ADDRESS: SHELTER (BY OTHERS) AS PER A STRUCTURAL ANALY515 REPORT PREPARED BY KM GON5ULTIN6 ENGINEERS, ING. 32 WEST UPPER FERRY ROAD, ENING, NJ -9 41405 fiZOUTE _715PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SCREENING 08628,(MIGHAEL L. BOHLINGER, PE NY LICENCE # 015100) DATED JULY AEGON I G, NY I I x(58 AROUND METRO PG5 FENCED 8, 2004, LAST UPDATED AUGUST 25, 2010 (REV 4) FROM KM REPORT EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, 10' HIGH +/- PREPARED FOR MTM DE516N 6ROUP, INC. P.O. BOX S HAZLET, NJ 01130, `t TOWN O� SOIJTHOLD ARBORVITAES OR APPROVED EQUAL, THE DESIGN FOR THE EXISTING 130'-0" HI6H LATTICE TOWER LOCATED (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-5) IN PEGONIG (TOWN OF SOUTHHOLD), NEW YORK, SUFFOLK COUNTY MEETS DRAWING TITLE: PROP05ED ELECTRIC SERVICE d THE REQUIREMENTS OF TIA/EIA-222-F FOR AN 14 MPH FA5TE5T-MILE TELCO ROUTED UNDER EXI5TIN6 WIND SPEED WITH 1/2" OF RADIAL ICE WITH 25% WIND LOAD REDUCTION SURFACE TO PROPOSED COMPOUND FOR THE PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION. THE FOUNDATION REACTIONS, WITH THE PROPOSED LOADING CONFIGURATION, WERE PROPOSED METRO 1`05 EQUIPMENT CABINETS FOUND TO BE GREATER THAN THE CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING i=L fS.N (TYP. OF 2) MOUNTED ON STEEL RAILS FOUNDATION DESIGN. THEREFORE MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANCHORED TO CONCRETE SLAB (180 50. FT. THE TOWER FOUNDATION. A SEPARATE SET OF DRAWIN65 AND DETAILS FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEUJ LEASE AREA) ARE PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. DRAWN eY: SHEET NUMBER: DGGI NOIRTP TOWER ELEVATION . ANTENNA 5FECIFICATIONS GFEGKEDBY: = PMo lxll SCALE. I" = 201-0" IIxl7 SCALE: 1/2 -0 D08/la/IO 2436 SCALE: I" = I0'-0" 2436 SCALE: I" = I'-m" MTM PROJECT #. OgMF'ST5008 PROP05ED 8" THICK 4000 P51 CONCRETE SLAB WITH A4k 2 LAYERS OF 6x6-8/8 WELDED WIRE FABRIC. 5EE lAlF PLANS FOR PAD SIZE (TOP TO BE LIGHTLY BRUSHED) NOTE1. 516 D E S I G Nu I. SIGN SHALL BE MOUNTED ON EXTERIOR SIDE OF FACILITY ODOR. G R O U P z PROPOSED CHAMFERED EDGE v 2. MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE 5'-0" ABOVE SILL TO CENTERLINE OF SIGN. k APPROX. x=x`XA- ARCHITECTURE � "v ` � gw _ FINISHGRADE ENGINEERING u m i1 si t Si y —x=x=x—x o��l RED BACKGROUND P. O. BOX 3 f f Q Sm U LI'II UV-RE515TANGE ^LA5TIG „} NOTICE, HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 T: 732 . 888 . 6210 *\ /� p Ij \ —WHITE LETTERS' :' GRAPHICS metro 1 CS F: 732 . 847 . 4335 RADIO FREQUENCY ANTENAS AT —WHITE BACKGR'?UND 4" THICK LAYER OF 3/4" DIA. / /\\\ \\ THIS SITE CRUSHED STONE BASE NY7315 PLEASE EXERCISE CAUTIONSite # BLACK LETTER: APPROVED BY EXISTING UNDISTURBED AROUND ANTENNAS DO NOT STAND PLANNING BOARD VIRGIN 501L IN FRONT OF ANTENNAS Network Operation Center o o TOWN OF sOUTHOLD 24/7 access line-1-866-672-6727 DATE 7 �c all PDD AR 2 r ti G �y 001 y CIA I CONCRETE SLA5 DETAIL 2 � I�N DETAIL6AFETY NOTICE SIGN a xll SCALE: 3/4" I'-0° 1XII SCALE. 1 1/2" = I'-«" 24x36 SCALE 1 1/211 24x I'-�" 24x36 5GALE. 3" = I'-c_ " SCALE: 3" I'-O" $yery �Q 24x36 SCALE. F," = '-O" qT 2 y Lou Moglino,AIA Robert W. Toms, ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER M-#AI 13345 NJ-#GE 36209 NY-#028992-1 NY-#075384 EQUIPMENT GABINET LEGEND THIS DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY 6 OI PROPO5ED LTE CABINET COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC " AND FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE EY THE TITLE CLIENT ANY PROPOSED METRO P65 W 3'-0" X D .2-11 13/16" X H 5'-II 1/b" DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY FROHIDITED, GPS UNIT MOUNTED ON 2 PROI-05ED EQUIPMENT CABINET GABLE BRIDGE (TYPICAL W 2'-11 3/8" X D 3'-I 13/16" X H 6-:311116" OF 2) (SEE DETAIL 3/Z-5) O3 I-ROP05ED BATTERY CABINET PROPOSED RACO/BELL FLOOD LIGHT MODEL 15816-5 (OR W 2'-4 q/I6" X D 2'-4 3/4" X H ^'-q 3/16" PROPOSED VALMONT GABLE APPROVED EQUAL) WITH ONLY (1) LIGHT FIXTURE. SECOND BRIDGE A55EMBLY OR LIGHT HOUSING ON FIXTURE MUST BE PLUGGED. FIXTURE TO ® PROI-05CO BATTERY CABINET APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDE HAVE PARSHIELD GLARE VISOR INSTALLED OVER THE W 2'-4 q/I6'' X D 2'-4 3/4" X H 5-q 3/16" SUPPORT POSTS @ 8'-0" ON PAR LAMP. LAMP HOLDER WITH SHIELD SHALL BE CENTER MAXIMUM POSITIONED IN A DOWNWARD DIRECTION IN A MANNER THAT WOULD CONSTITUTE A FULL CUT-OFF LUMINAIRE (No MORE THAN 10% OF THE LUMEN OUTPUT IS AT ANGLES 09/02/10 RE-155UED A5 PRILIMINARY5 BETWEEN 90° t 60° BELOW THE LOWEST LIGHT-EMITTING / COAXIAL GABLES PART OF THE LUMINAIRE). /A 08/18/10 ISSUED A5 PRILIMINARY5 ROUTED ALONG GABLE PROP05ED METRO P65 PTC CABINET ON UNISTRUT FRAME f BRIDGE GRATING ON MOUNTED TO GALVANIZED POST WITH LIGHT ABOVEREVISION TRAPEZE HANGERS REV DATE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINETS GLIENT: PROPOSED 10'-0"+/- HIGH LANDSCAPING (I LTE, I EQUIPMENT d 2 BATTERY CABINETS) o SCREENING ON STEEL FRAME MOUNTED TO CONCRETE PAD 3 1/2"cl) SCHEDULE 40 °- POST, AT 8'-0" \ 4 MAXIMUM ON CENTER ? metroPCS z New York, L.L.C. 0 SET OF (3) STAKES WITH .) GUY WIRE5 BETWEEN 1/2 , T AND 2/3 WAY UP TREE. ` GLIENT PROJECT #. 4" HIGH MULCH MOUND TO NY-7515 FORM SAUCER AROUND TREE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM ��„ 0 51TE ADDRESS: TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. GRADE °° s � 8 ga° $ x mss °=�a�g OO OO -4 1 -4-O�J �O L)T _2 5J TOP CONCRETE i=EGON I G , NY 1 I �i58 EXISTING 501E �\ \\/ / /\\ /%A SAD �p�_4�� TOWN 0i= SOIJTHOLID a 1'-4" DIA. CONCRETE NEW PLANT GRADE FILL. / \ \\ //\//\ FOOTING, USE 8"x8"xyz° j/// DRAWING TIT E: G (MAX.) BASE PLATE WITHY2` DIA. ANCHORS FOR SCARIFY 4" BELOW ROOT // // / `// // / ,>% / // /\\�\\% m-mm FINISH GRADE m MOUNTING TO SLAB BALL REGOMPAGTED. \/\ PROPOSED 6" THICK PROPOSED STEEL BEAM - - m � //\//�. //\//\�`�'��\\v: \//\ \//\\/ LAYER 3/4" DIA. STAKES TO EXTEND 18"— \/\` \ PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB CRUSHED STONE BASE BELOW TREE PIT IN (SEE DETAIL I/Z-5) UNDISTURBED GROUND. DRAWN BY. SHEET NUMBER: DGa CA5I_ E BRIC)GE DETAIL TfREE PLaANTIN� LDET,41L TYPICAL_ EQUIFT-1ENT' ELEVATION GHEGKEDBY = — IxIl5GALE. 1/4" = I'-m" xllSGALE: N.T.S. PMO 24x36 56ALE: I/2" I'-0° 24x36 SGALE: N.T.S. 24x36GSCALE; 1/2" II'-m D08�18�10 MTM PROJECT # OgMP5T5008 Q1J PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS q SO(/ O MAILING ADDRESS: � Ty P.O.Box 1179MARTIN H.SIDOR �� Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS coTown Hall Annex KENNETH L. ICH I II.DS % OQ 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI O�CDua � Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax: 631765-3136 February 15, 2011 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard&Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington,NY 11743 RE: Site plan for Metro PCS @ Southold Police Station Located: Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM41000-75-5-14.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: As per your request, the Planning Staff conducted a site inspection of the above property on February 8, 2011 where the site work was determined to be in conformance with the approved site plan. Please note any future requested change to the site plan should include a copy of the approved stamped site plan noting the location of the requested change. If you have any questions regarding the above, contact me anytime. Thank you. Sincerely Kristy Winser Senior Planner Cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer , MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �a SOUTy P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �0� Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS OQ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �� i (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI '�Mum�� Southold,NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 16, 2010 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Approval: Site Plan for Metro PCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, November 15, 2010: WHEREAS, this application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on February 25, 2010 including a site plan prepared by Lou Moglino, AIA, dated May 8, 2009; and WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent technical consultant retained by the Town to assist in the review process; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met;-and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies having jurisdiction and by the independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and Metro PCS at Southold Police Station Page Two November 16, 2010 WHEREAS, on September 16, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and recommended the proposed project be found consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, a public hearing was held and closed by the Southold Town Planning Board regarding the special exception consideration and site plan; and WHEREAS, the application is eligible for waiver of site plan elements under § 280-76.2 on the basis that the wireless facility is existing on property owned and used by the Town Department of Public Works and the base equipment shelter can not be seen from other properties and roads; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on November 12, 2010, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and certified that the proposed action is a permitted use in this Residential 40 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board granted a Special Exception Approval for this application; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the action is consistent under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and be it further RESOLVED, the Planning Board hereby waives the full landscaping requirement pursuant to section § 280-76.2 as described above; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the site plan entitled "Metro PCS", prepared by Lou Moglino, R.A., dated May 08, 2009, and last revised September 02, 2010, including the following six plans: 1. T-1 Title Sheet 2. Z-01 Radius Map & surrounding Information 3. Z-02 Site Plan & Zoning Information 4. Z-03 Partial Site Plan & Equipment Plan 5. Z-04 Tower Elevations & Details 6. Z-05 Site Details Metro PCS at Southold Police Station Page Three November 16, 2010 Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative, must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. A copy of the approved site plan (6 pages) is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encl. cc: Town Engineer w/map Building Dept. w/map I • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o��Of SOUryo • P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold, NY 11971 Chair # # OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS G Q Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 JAMES DSJ.WILCENSKI H.RICH IIIOl'yCOMM N� (cor.Mas Southold, lYYo`uAve.) DO Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 27, 2011 John J. Coughlin, Esq. R6, Nielsen, Huber& Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington NY 11743 Re: Site Plan Application for Metro PCS New York, LLC located at Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane in Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $4,144.08 for the balance of the funds provided by your client to the Town to cover the expense of a consultant to assist with the review of the application referenced above. Your client sent an initial amount of$1,500. We requested and received from the applicant in June 2010 an additional $7,000. The consultant, Center for Municipal Solutions, subsequently billed a total of $4,355.92 (see attached invoices #55141-001, 55141-002, & 55141-003). Pursuant to Town Code §280- 74A(4)(c) we are returning the unused portion of the funds to you. Sincerely, --- n Q Martin Sidor Chair Atts. Vendor No. Check No. Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher Vendor Name Vendor Address Entered by MetroPCS New York LLC Five Skyline Drive Xl t bate Vendor Telephone Number Hawthorne, NY 10532 Town Clerk Vendor Contact Invoice Invoice Invoice Net Purchase Order Number Date. Total Discount Amount Claimec Number Description of Goods or Services - , "" F+ard and Account Number • G ' L' $4, 144.OE $4,144.OE 21316 reimburse escrow funds s'&� A 4 SQO 500 consulting review re 4, 144.OE 4,144.0 wireless application 91 SCTM#1000-75-5-14. 1 '2115.40 $4, 144.0 ) $4, 144.0 ) � . 11028 . 36 130 . 75 + 1 , 0H'1 • S1 ; 0 0 3 1'n �t Se 355 •{)2.x ; 15 U0 ° 0C , Fi✓ i4 4 1 14 4- C) �. 'ayee Certification Department Certification SignatureTitle Signature Company Name Date Title Planning Director Date 10 f OWN OF SOUTHOLO Purchase Order # 21316 Tax Exempt # A163554 Date May 2'6, 2010 Account * B 8020 5 500 500 Deliver and send billing to: Vendor # 3321 Department PLANNING BOARD Richard A. Comi a, Address d/b/a Center for Municipal Solutions 10 Cambridge Dr. L LGlenmont, NY 12077 r VENDOR �• "Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for paymerrOy!. ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT QIST . . ,TOfiAL Wireless /�, Souther orn ort NOT°6VCEED: ZSCTM i8r599.�0 Y i 4ti r \ aI s THIS PURCHASE:ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE:SUPERVISOR I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE DEPARTMENT'S CERTIFICATION OF GOODS OR'"t SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE SERVICES IN THE AP ROPRIATIONcCHARGED _. I certify that the goods or services were received by this Depart t and all exceptions duly noted. rDept.Read _�aln htr,G 7�rc I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST Signed Title AND TRUE PURCHASE ORDER Supervisor Date • RESOLUTION 2011-684 • ADOPTED DOC ID: 7155 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO.2011-684 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON OCTOBER 11,2011: Resolved, that unused consulting fees paid to the Town totaling$4,144.08 be refunded to the applicant, MetroPCS New York LLC. Elizabeth A.Neville Southold Town Clerk RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: William Ruland, Councilman SECONDER:Vincent Orlando, Councilman AYES: Ruland, Orlando, Talbot, Krupski Jr., Evans, Russell WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, February 14, 2011 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications Project name: SCTM#: 1000-7515-14.1 - - –.._... -------- -- -- --- - ----------------- --- --- -- Location: _ Southold Police Station, 165 Pec_onic Lane, Pe_conic _ Description: This application is to affix a wireless antenna_to an existing lattice tow_er and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District._ Status: Approved Site Plan Pending Final Ins_pecti_o__n__________ Action: I Request for Final Inspection Attachments: Draft Letter Project name: Seifert Construction Corp. SCTM#: 1000-141-3-44 Location: 11780 Sound Avenue, in Mattituck __ Description: This proposed site plan is for construction of a new building 3,965 sq. ft. (38'x78' plus a 38' x 6' porch overhang) with approximately 2,191 sq. ft. of warehouse, 773 sq. ft. of display area, 228 sq. ft. of porch and 773 sq. I ft. of second floor office to be used as an office, warehouse/custom cabinet workshop on a 11,517.67 sq. ft. parcel in the LI Zone located _ approximately 520' w/o Pacific Street on the s/s_/o Sound Avenue. Status: Approved Site Plan Pending Final Inspection Action: Request for Final Inspection _ Attachments: None Project name. _ Owen Construction SCTM#: 1000-102-2-12.5 _ Location: n/e corner of be of Lane and NYS Route 25, in Cutcho ue Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing dwelling to professional offices on a 20,224.28 sq. ft. parcel in the RO Zonin District, Status: A roved Pending Inspection Action: Request to amend their site plan to add a sin___ Attachments: -___j None __ Project name (Aries Estates/TUI _� SCTM#: 1000-22-3-2 Location: at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way which extends north from Kayleigh's Court in East Marion Description: This proposal is for a standard subdivision of an 11.4418-acre parcel into two lots, where Lot 1 = 3.7667 acres, including 1.7229 acres of open space, and Lot 2 = 7.6751 acres, including 4.6711 acres of open _ space,_in the R-80 Zoning Status: _ Conditional Preliminar�r Approval -- -- ------------------Action: Applicant Applicant requests to address Planning Board to advise of my discussions with title companies and present the original deed into Mr. - — TUlly�s r�edecessor in title_ — ---- ------- --- Attachments: None — — Southold Town Plannin&, ard Work Session - Page Two - IIsruary 14, 2011 Project name: Eve WinstonSCTM#: 11000-105-1 4 _Location: 3450 Private Road #13, Mattituck _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Description: —j This proposal is to subdivide a 5.58 acre parcel into two lots, where__Lot 1= 1.84 acres (80,003 s.f.) and Lot 2 = 3.7 acres (163,044 s.f.) in the R= 80 Zoning Distnict._ Status: --- -men----- ------- --- ----- ----- Action: Review site visit. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: Droskoski and Se�enoskiSCTM#: 1000-18 4-7.4 & 7.8 Location: 27835 NYS Route 25, Orient Description: This proposed lot line change will transfer SCTM#1000-18-4-7.8 (0.3185 acres) to SCTM#1000-18-4-7.4 as part of a Stipulation of Settlement. SCTM#1000-18-4-7.4 will increase in size from approximately 40,800 sq. ft. to approximatel 54,000 sq. ft. Status: Oen Action: Accept application with modifications. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: David Verity_ SCTM#: 11000-78-3-26 Location: 860 Nakomis Road, Southold _ Description: Requesting lot recognition of two separate parcels. Status: Action: Review Draft ZBA Comments. Attachments: Draft ZBA Comments 5:30 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda For Discussion: Comprehensive Plan Team Meeting Schedule 2 `- 9 COMPLETE�W XRELE55 Complete Wireless Contracting, Inc. 1457 Montauk Hwy. E. Patchogue,NY 11772 Phone: 631654-5915 Fax: 631654-5918 1/21/11 Town of Southold Planning Dept Attn: Christy Ref: 165 Peconic Lane, MetroPCS Co-Location Tax Map# 473889 S,B,C: 75-5-14.1 In reference to the mentioned site above, Complete Wireless Inc.will be needing a final inspection from the Planning Department Kindly let me know if you need any further information. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Michael Fiorello JAN 2 4 2011 (c)631-445-0610 (p)631-654-5915 (fl631-654-5918 (c)michael.fiorello@completewirelessinc.com -lis-3136 RE,NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEW YORE AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 423-4100 FAcSIXILE: (631) 423-4104 OF GOU"EL WXLLi J. NIELSEN November 17, 2010 BY HAND and E-Mail Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner NOV 18 2010 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building j 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York,LLC (Site No.NY 7315) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic, New York 11958 SCI'M#: 1000—75 —5 — 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser As you are aware, we are the attorneys for MetroPCS New York, LLC (`MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned matter. Please be advised that Tracy Sorensen, an attorney with our office, is authorized to sign off on the Planning Board approved drawings. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER& COUGHLIN, LLP By: CougW JJC/ts MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �q sour P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �Q� yO�o Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND Q� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI yCOW, Southold,NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 16, 2010 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Approval: Special Exception for Metro PCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, November 15, 2010: WHEREAS, this application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on February 25, 2010 including a site plan prepared by Lou Moglino, AIA, dated May 8, 2009; and WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent technical consultant retained by the Town to assist in the review process; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies having jurisdiction and by the independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and Metro PCS at Southold Police Station Page Two November 16, 2010 WHEREAS, on September 16, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board agreed to waive the requirement to construct an entirely new antenna support structure that meets the Town Code, pursuant to §280-76.2F. It was determined that the pre-existing antenna support structure, though not in compliance with the Town Code, could be allowed due to the finding by the Planning Board that the structure is already located in a place that would comply the same as any alternate locations, and the new antennas will be constructed to be as unobtrusive as possible; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and recommended the proposed project be found consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, a public hearing was held and closed by the Southold Town Planning Board regarding the special exception consideration and site plan; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on November 12, 2010, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and certified that the proposed action is a permitted use in this Residential 40 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the application to determine whether it satisfied the requirements for a special exception pursuant to Town Code Section 280-142 as follows: 1. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts. The tower already exists and the new antennas are flush-mounted to reduce visibility as much as possible. The equipment cabinets are not visible from outside the property. 2. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. The property is used by the town for municipal purposes. 3. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location. The antenna support structure already exists, and the facility has been found to meet the Maximum Permissible Exposure limits set by the Federal Communications Commission. 4. That the use is in harmony with and promotes the general purposes and intent of this chapter. Metro PCS at Southold Police Station page Three November 16, 2010 5. That the use is compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and over-all appearance. The antennas are flush-mounted as close to the existing structure to minimize the visual obtrusiveness as much as possible. 6. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the application to determine whether it met the additional standards for a Special Exception Approval for a Wireless Communication Facility pursuant to §280-73B as follows: 1. Modification of the existing facility for a co-location of another wireless carrier has been found to be a public necessity, in that it is required to meet current or expected demands of the telecommunications provider and to render adequate service to the public. 2. The applicant is co-locating their antennas on an existing antenna support structure. 3. It is more feasible to co-locate the antennas on the existing structure rather than construct a new structure. A new structure is not desirable because it would contribute to visual clutter of the scenic corridor; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby finds that the standards for Special Exception Approval have been met; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the action is consistent under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning hereby grants a waiver of 280-76.1A., "Pre-existing antenna support structures and antennas not in compliance"; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval for the Special Exception for the application referenced above. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, `N Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encl. cc: Town Engineer Building Department i • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS q sorry P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �Q� Old _ Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS OQ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI Southold,NY Tele hone: 631765-1938 36 PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 16, 2010 P' 6LDG. FPL John J. Coughlin, Esq. loNJ of HiNOLD Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Approval: Special Exception for Metro PCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, November 15, 2010: WHEREAS, this application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on February 25, 2010 including a site plan prepared by Lou Moglino, AIA, dated May 8, 2009; and WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent technical consultant retained by the Town to assist in the review process; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies having jurisdiction and by the independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �pF SO//jP.O.Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �0� Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS Y� 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI IyCOU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD a)oHiros,�Nr�ol November 16, 2010 ld3a cola C:_ i /i0id John J. Coughlin, Esq. O Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP Q 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Approval: Site Plan for Metro PCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, November 15, 2010: WHEREAS, this application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on February 25, 2010 including a site plan prepared by Lou Moglino, AIA, dated May 8, 2009; and WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent technical consultant retained by the Town to assist in the review process; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met;-and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies having jurisdiction and by the independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and r S \ Town Hall Annex 1� l� Telephone(681) 765-1802 54375 Main Road R y O Fax(631) 765-95,02 P.O. Bos 1179 4� �y Southold,NY 11971-0939 i9 N �eCOUNTV,� BUILDING DEPAIUNI :N'[' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairman FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: November 12, 2010 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Metro PCS Location: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM# 1000—Section 75- Block 5 — Lot 14.1 Date: September 02, 2010 Revised Date: 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 144 AND 280 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Wireless Co-location IS A PERMITTED USE BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN THIS R-80 DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. C Michael J. Veri Chief Building Inspector OFFICE LOCATION: r�j F SOU y MAILING ADDRESS: <` Town Hall Annex ��� Old* P.O. Box 1179 L 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 cn ,ac Telephone: 631 765-1935 �O Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Martin Sidor, Chair Town of Southold Planning Boar:,, From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: November 10, 2010 Re: MetroPCS NY, LLC at Police Station SCTM# 75.-5-14.1 This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner � 0 X010 ARC Minutes Page Two October 21,2010 o That the proposed display area located on the corner of C.R.48 and Youngs Avenue should be relocated to the westerly side of the property along Route 48,bringing the fencing further back to allow for a display area in that location and the planting of T-8' high evergreens in front of the fencing to add to the screening of the storage area. o The addition of low lying vegetation is recommended in lieu of the display area located at the corner of C.R. 48 and Youngs Avenue. o The addition of screening along Youngs Avenue along the proposed staging area with T-8' evergreens. o An updated lighting plan to be Dark Sky compliant on the property. • METRO PCS NY, LLC at POLICE STATION SCTM#: 1000-75-5-14.1 Larry R@, Attorney from RL6, Neilsen, Huber&Coughlin presented the project along with Kristy Winser,Senior Planner. The project is approved as submitted today. • METRO PCS NY,LLC at MARJAM/PENNY SCTM#: 1000-141-3-38.1 Larry R@, Attorney from R6, Neilsen, Huber &Coughlin presented the project along with Kristy Winser,Senior Planner. The Committee is recommending evergreen screening around the structure. All other aspects of the project are approved as submitted today. Motion made and seconded for approval. All in favor. A motion was made to close the meeting at 5:05p.m. All in favor. us"6��U EIiifabeth Cantrell, A.R.C. Secretary Sanford Hanauer,Chairperson er11FF0( Town Hall Annex Reynolds duPont,Jr. O� �Cr7 54375 Route 25 Herbert Ernest �� PO Box 1179 Joseph Lee Southold,NY 11971 Ronald McGreevy �t Howard Meinke �f, ^ Fax(631)765-6641 Nicholas Planamento Telephone:(631)765- 1892 Mark Schwartz southoldtown.northfork.net Elizabeth Thompson Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee J1 Minutes 4:00p.m.,October 21, 2010 NOV Town Hall Annex Executive Board Room r - Members Present: Sandy Hanauer, Chairperson;Joseph Lee; Howard Meinke; Nicholas Planamento; Mark Schwartz; Kristy Winser,Senior Planner; Elizabeth Cantrell,Secretary The minutes for the August 18, 2010 meeting were approved. Introduction• All applicants will give a presentation consisting of drawings, exterior materials samples and other information required by the Planning Department to the Committee. The Committee will ask questions and make suggestions as part of a general discussion with each applicant. Final recommendations from the ARC will be presented to the Planning Board in the ARC Meeting Minutes, and be made part of the Planning file for that application. The Planning Board will consider these recommendations, together with all comments from other agencies, and provide the applicant with a comprehensive written list of its requested revisions. New Applications: • TIDY CAR SCTM#: 1000-55-5-2.2 Kristy Winser,Senior Planner presented the project. The Committee is recommending the following modifications to the current site plan: 9 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS *Iaf SO(/l P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �Q k yOIO Southold, NY 11971 Chair 41 41 OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS 2A �0 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND ^� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI l'YCOU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 19, 2010 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Close Hearing: Proposed Special Exception Consideration & Site Plan for Metro PCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Coughlin: A public hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 18, 2010 regarding the above-referenced Special Exception Consideration & Site Plan. The public hearing was closed. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS apt SOUIy P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR h0� Old Southold, NY 11971 Chair ,I(. OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND 0� • �� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI COU Southold,Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1838 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 19, 2010 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Negative Declaration: Proposed Special Exception Consideration & Site Plan for Metro PCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, October 18, 2010: WHEREAS, this application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. r • • Metro PCS at Southold Police Station Pa-ge 2 October 19, 2010 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, -N- Sri Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encl. cc: Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Building Department Southold Town ARC Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �pF SOUry P.O.Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR ��� Old Southold, NY 11971 Char OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS CA Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS �0 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI Un 1 1 Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significance October 18, 2010 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: MetroPCS NY, LLC at the Southold Town Police Station SCTM#: 1000-75-5-14.1 Location: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( No (X) Description of Action: This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The proposed action requires special exception approval from the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to Section 280-70(E) of the Southold Town Code. SEQR Negative Declaration Page Two October 18, 2010 The property is owned by the Town of Southold and is currently improved with a 130' lattice tower and associated equipment buildings. E r i F i! YF h, �]Y10Yww 'Mmu,IlepY.I�W1��+w1NN ITNm WYywlN Figure 1. Lattice Tower and Equipment Compound The property is zoned Residential-80 (R-80). Zoning districts located within the vicinity of the parcel include B (Business) to the southeast, R-80 (Residential) immediately to the north, northwest and south; AC (Agricultural Conservation) to the west and R-40 (Residential) to the south. The current use of the property is municipal services. The Town of Southold Animal Shelter, Police Department and Highway Department are located on the property. Surrounding land use in the vicinity of the site is agriculture to the east, west and north. Residential areas occur to the northeast and south of the location. Figure 2. Tower Location and Land Use. SEQR Negative Declaration Page Three October 18, 2010 The action involves the co-location of 6 antennae on new antenna support frames and 4 equipment cabinets within the existing compound. Based on the use of the existing improved facilities and minimal ground disturbance, the proposed action will not cause a substantial intensification of use over the current use. Further, the proposed action will not cause significant impacts to agricultural, open space or recreational resources. No substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise level will occur as a result of the proposed action. The Tower is visible from County Route 48 and State Road 25, both designated New York State Scenic Byways and secondary roadways. A Visual Analysis (dated November 16, 2010) prepared by EBI Consulting has been submitted. The Planning Board has determined that placement of 6 additional antennae on the existing tower will not result in significant impacts to view sheds important to the community. Equipment cabinets will be buffered through the installation of a landscaped buffer 10' in height. No exterior lighting is proposed as a part of the action. No major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy will occur. The applicant has submitted an assessment of Radio Frequency (RF) compliance entitled Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report (2009, amended in 2010). The report concluded that the radio frequency emissions from the combination of the existing and proposed antennae to be in compliance with FCC Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. The report further concluded that the RF level is 146 times below the federal limit established as safe for continued human exposure. Therefore, no known creation of a hazard to human health is expected to occur as a result of the proposed action. The site is improved and cleared, therefore, the proposed action will not result in the significant removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation. The impact to soils resulting from the construction of a 140 square foot concrete pad would be negligible. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, in a 2009 policy memorandum entitled Guidelines for Consultation with NY Natural Heritage regarding Proposed Collocations of Telecommunication Facilities on Existing Towers and Buildings (2009), has determined that proposed actions involving the co-location of new equipment on an existing structure (tower) are not likely to adversely affect Federally- listed species in New York, nor have any significant impacts on migratory birds or other trust resources. Therefore, no substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, significant habitat area or result in adverse impacts to a threatened or endangered species or the habitat of such a species are expected to occur. The proposed action will not impair the character or quality of important cultural/historical, architectural, or aesthetic resources or existing community or neighborhood character or result in a material conflict with the community current plans or goals as officially approved. SEQR Negative Declaration Paae Four October 18, 2010 Based upon such, no significant adverse impacts to the environment are expected to occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Address: Southold Town Planning Board Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 cc: Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Building Department Southold Town ARC Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals �W Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: et4c-o-f-A-S� SS SCTM#: 1000- V-LL x> v` a'^' �_ i, u= �j Date: OCT 19 2010 Comments: CYC52r1� �9�d2k S�SS(aeU ��p SCr � CIL 41 KfPL-�- )V-0.4) • F( 00tFJT 19W 6t DEMc S Planning Report Prepared for: Proposed Telecommunications Facility 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic NY 11958 Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.001; Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY Pennoni Project Name: Metro NY7315 SPD Lattice Southold October 15, 2010 Prepared by: Penn no Engineering 6 Surveying of New York P.C. 460 West 34th Street ) 9 2010 New York, NY 10001 -1)7 C Ronald J. Reinertsen,AICP, P.P. American Institute of Certified Planners(AICP) Certified Planner#020344 New Jersey Professional Planner(P.P.) License LI-05891 460 West 34th Street • New York, NY 10001 Tel 212-239-7600 Fax 212-465-1730 www.pennoni.com Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION I II. VEO RVIEW 1 III. PROPOSED USE-LAND USE LAW. 2 IV. PROPOSED USE:WAIVER REQUESTED 3 V. ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION 3 VI. SUMMATION 4 VII. MISCELLANEOUS 4 460 West 34th Street • New York, NY 10001 • Tel. 212-239-7600 Fax 212-465-1730 www.pennoni.com 0 0 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic NY 11958 October 15, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.001; Town of Southold, Suffolk County,NY Site: NY7315 I. Introduction Pennoni Engineering and Surveying of New York, P.C. ("PESNY") has been requested to provide this Planning Report with respect to an application ("Application") filed by MetroPCS New York, LLC ("Metro PCS" or "Applicant") to construct a proposed wireless telecommunications facility ("Facility")within the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY ("Town"and"County", respectively) PESNY is an affiliate of Pennoni Associates Inc., a multi-disciplined consulting engineering & planning firm with offices throughout New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, New England, and Maryland; collectively PESNY and Pennoni Associates shall be referred to as "Pennoni" in this Planning Report. II. Overview Metro PCS is a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licensed telecommunications provider. Applicant's license area in this region is identified as the New York Major Trading Area, a part of which encompasses the County. The Applicant, as part of its affirmative obligation to provide coverage within its licensed area, has proposed to construct its Facility at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic NY 11958 a/k/a Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.001 (the"Property"). The Facility is proposed to be located on and around a 130 foot above ground level ("AGL") lattice – type tower ("Tower"), which is surrounded by an irregularly– shaped compound ("Compound"). A review of plans submitted by Applicant – "Site #: NY7315" by MTM Design Group Inc. (the "Zoning Drawings") indicates that antennas for four (4) other telecommunication facilities (Nextel, AT&T, T—Mobile and Verizon) are currently are located on the Tower, with ground equipment located within the Compound, with Nextel and Verizon utilizing equipment shelters and T-Mobile outdoor equipment cabinets. Whip antennas atop the Tower reach a height of 145'AGL. The Facility's principal components upon the Tower shall be comprised of (a) six (6) panel antennas attached to the "legs" of the Tower at a maximum height of 927 AGL, and (b) radio and other associated equipment which are to be located within a proposed 12' x 15' compound expansion ("Compound Expansion"), to be located in a "notch" of the Compound located between the T-Mobile and Nextel equipment areas. Applicant's equipment shall be placed upon a proposed 10' x 14' concrete slab. An installation such as that proposed by Applicant is often referred to as a "co-location"facility,which utilizes existing structures (such as the Tower) rather than requiring the construction of a new freestanding structure dedicated to support the antennas for such a facility. As per Tax Assessor Records and Tax Maps, the Property is an irregularly–shaped, with frontage on Main Road (C.R. 25) to the south and Peconic Lane to the northeast. The Tower is located in the western corner of the Property, a substantial distance from public rights of way. A review of Aerial Photography and a site visit indicate that the base of the Tower is greatly buffered by tree cover and existing conditions from much of the surrounding area. A review of the Town's zoning map and other pertinent records indicates the Property is located in located in an R-80 (Residential Low Density A) Zone District in the west/central portion of the Town. The Town –owned Property supports various municipal operations, including those of the 460 West 34th Street • New York, NY 10001 • Tel:212-239-7600 • Fax:212-465-1730 www pennoni.com 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic NY 11958 October 15, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.001; Town of Southold, Suffolk County,NY Site: NY7315 Highway Department, as well as containing Police Headquarters. A Police owned —and operated monopole is located along the Main Road frontage to the Property. Contiguous parcels along Main Road are located in a General Business (B)Zone District, with those areas directly south of Police Headquarters zoned R40 (Residential Low Density AA). Abutting parcels to the north, east and west are located in an Agricultural Conservation (AC) Zone district. Existing land uses reflects permitted uses in the underlying zone districts and the municipal uses of the Property. III. Proposed Use—Land Use Law. The Southold Town Zoning Code ("Ordinance") specifically addresses telecommunications uses in § 280-67 — 280.76.5 (Wireless Communications Facilities) referred to in this Report as the "Wireless Ordinance". Goals for telecommunications facilities are described in various section of the Wireless Ordinance,the"prongs"of which are as follows: • Location coals o (1)Applicants for wireless communications facilities shall locate, site and erect said wireless facilities in accordance with the following priorities, of the lowest priority. (a) On an existing antenna support structure or other structures on Town-owned properties, including the right-of-way, (b) On an existing antenna support structure or other structures on other property in the Town, (c)A new antenna support structure on Town-owned properties, (d) A new antenna support structure on properties in the LI or LIO Zoning Districts, (e) A new antenna support structure on properties in the MI, Mil, B or HB Zoning Districts, (f)A new antenna support structure on properties in the AC, R40, R- 80, R-120, R-200, R-400, LB, R0, RR, HD or AHD Zoning Districts (§ 280-70 General requirements for all wireless communication facilities). • CQ-Location goals o (5) Co-location. Wireless communication facilities shall be designed to provide for co-location by multiple providers or designed so that they can be retrofitted to accommodate multiple providers, wherever possible (§ 280-72.A—Site plan approval). • Aesthetic goal (visual impacb o It is the express purpose of this article to minimize the visual and environmental impacts of wireless communication facilities while protecting the health, safety and welfare of Southold's citizens and allowing wireless service providers to meet their technological and service objectives (§ 280-67 Purpose). • FCC—reed goals: o C. No new antenna support structures may be constructed without a carrier licensed by the FCC as a provider. An FCC licensed provider of wireless 460 West 34th Street • New York, NY 10001 • TO:212-239-7600 • Fax:212-465-1730 www pennoni.com 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic NY 11958 October 15, 2010 Page 3 of 4 Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.001; Town of Southold, Suffolk County,NY Site: NY7315 communications services must be the applicant or the co-applicant for any proposed new wireless communication facility, co-location or modification (§280-70—General requirements for all wireless communication facilities). o K. Radio emissions must fall within the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits established by the FCC (§ 280-70 — General requirements for all wireless communication facilities). § 280-76.2 (Waivers of criteria) provides for provisions to waive certain requirements of the Wireless Ordinance, with § 280-76.2 (B, C & D) concentrating on waivers for landscaping treatments based (in general)upon existing conditions and/or other factors. IV. Pr000sed Use: Waiver Requested Design Waiver: • Landscaping required, waiver from requirement requested (§ 280-70.N(4) — General requirements for all wireless communication facilities-Site design standards). V. 9nalvsis of thelir t� ion General: Sound Land Use Planning should strive to be rational and certain, and avoid being arbitrary and capricious. Comprehensive Planning should include provision of sufficient space in appropriate locations for a variety of uses,which may include agricultural, residential, recreational, commercial and industrial. Planning involves the balancing of interests, and must be cognizant of underlying rules and regulations governing proposed uses. Positivg Aspects The Tower is a Priority 1 co-location site, deemed suitable by Ordinance for telecommunications uses, and previously — existing and/or approved setback relief are not being increased. The Property itself is a unique location, containing an existing tall structure (the Tower) that eliminates the need to construct a new monopole. The Compound Expansion fits into the contours of the existing Compound and is not visible from the vast majority of the area, effectively shielded from public view by the built and natural environment. Items of Note relating to the Application: • The operation of Applicant's proposed facility is licensed by the FCC; as a result falls within the mandate of the Telecommunications Act encouraging a more efficient use of radio in the public interest. Approval will provide more seamless and reliable coverage and offer more marketplace choice & competition to the public at large. Other positive aspects of the use include the provision of commercial and essential services to the public, including but not limited to: phone calls, texting, video streaming, Wi-Fi, E-911, and 460 West 34th Street • New York, NY 10001 • Tel:212-239-7600 • Fax:212-465-1730 wwwpennoni.com 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic NY 11958 October 15, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.001; Town of Southold, Suffolk County,NY Site: NY7315 Wireless Amber Alerts. • As of December 2008 there were 270.3 million wireless subscribers in the United States, representing 87 % of the marketplace, with E-911 calls per day averaging 291,000 (Source: CTIA: The Wireless Association). More than one of every five American homes (22.7%) had only wireless telephones (also known as cellular telephones, cell phones, or mobile phones)during the first half of 2009--an increase of 2.5 percentage points since the second half of 2008(Center for Disease Control, December 2009). Additional Considerations: Photo simulations (SIMMS) of the proposed Facility have been created by EBI Consulting as part of the Application. Pennoni has conducted a separate site visit, reviewed the existing conditions of the Property and viewed the Tower from the identical vantage points utilized for the SIMMS. The SIMMS affords a variety of views of proposed conditions consistent with that verified by Pennoni. The Facility is in context with its surroundings, will have little or no visibility from residential and other surrounding areas, and shall enable the Applicant to deliver an FCC—licensed service in the least obtrusive manner possible. The Wireless Ordinance provides provisions for waiver requests from landscaping requirements if certain criteria are met, including existing conditions of the site that limit public visibility. The waiver request for landscaping put forth by Applicant reflects recognition of the great distances from the public right of way and existing conditions which effectively eliminates any public views of the Compound area. Surrounding conditions (such as existing buffering and separation distances) are site — specific factors that affect the Application. Setback conditions are less or equal to that previously approved, and the equipment itself is strategically located away from most public view shed areas. VI. Summation The proposed Facility will not result in substantial changes to the physical characteristics of the area, nor will it have significant impacts on the character of the neighborhood or on the environmental conditions of the area. VII. Miscellaneous Materials reviewed in preparation of this document include: • "Site#: NY7315"by MTM Design Group Inc. • "Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communication Facility NY7315"by EBI Consulting • The Southold Town Zoning Code. • Communications Act of 1934 • Telecommunications Act of 1996. J:1ProjectslSTSMSTSW1003PM-Metro NY-7315 SPD Lattice SoutholchDDCUMENTSWY7315 SPD Lattice Southold Planning Reportxoc 460 West 34th Street • New York. NY 10001 • Tel:212-239-7600 • Fax:212-465-1730 www pennoni.com F RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & GOUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEw YORE AVENUE HUNTINGTON, Naw YORE 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 GP GOU1P68L WILEL J. NIELSEN October 15, 2010 BY HAND and FACSIMILE Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road ?wi� Southold,New York 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York,LLC (Site No.NY 7315) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic,New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75 —5 — 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: As you are aware, we are the attorneys for MetroPCS New York, LLC (`MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned matter. Pursuant to the requirements found in the Town of Southold Town Code § 55-1, enclosed herewith please find the following: 1. Executed Affidavit of Posting; 2. Executed Affidavit of Mailing; 3. Copy of the legal notice sent to owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the subject property, which notice was sent via certified mail,return receipt requested; 4. List of property owners of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the subject property; 5. Certified mail receipts; and 6. Return receipt green cards, received to date. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing,please communicate with the undersigned. Very truly yours, RE,NIELSEN, HUBER&COUGHLIN, LLP By: 00111N. Cougwifi JJC/ts Encls. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41405 Route 25) , Peconic, NY - SCTM# 1000-75-5-14.1 by placing the Town's official poster notices) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s)where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on Monday, October 18, 2010. Your Name (print) Signature Address fo1I 'S Ito Date Sworn to before me 15th day of October, 2010 Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY. 12:00 noon. Fri., 10/16110 Re: Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS NY. LLC at the Southold Town Police Station SCTM#s: 1000-75-5-14.1 Date of Public Hearing: Monday, October 18. 2010. 6:10 p.m. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 145 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41405 Route 25), Peconic, NY - SCTM# 1000-75-5-14.1 On Eriday, October 8, 2010, 1 have sent notices, by certified mall–return receipt,the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Peconic Lane and Route 25 (a/k%a Main Road) Ff— C� C / SDr-e --n C A Your Name (prrnQ Sig re Address — � - C)I D Data Sworn to efore me this 8th of Octo er, 2010 ` e Notary Pub is DOROT"l—A.-IMELARD Notary Public, State of New York No, 01 BE603t3810 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires Feb.7,20 PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 10/15/10 Re: Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS NY LLC at the Southold Town Police tion SCTM#s: 1000-75-5-14.1 Date of Public Hearing: Monday, October 18, 2010, 6:10 p.m. LIST OF OWNERS OF RECORD FOR PROPERTIES WHICH ABUT OR ARE ACROSS FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET FROM 165 PECONIC LANE, PECONIC, NY (SCTM # 1000—75— 5— 14.1) JILL BLUM PHYLLIS CATALANO P.O. Box 151 45 Doud Street Peconic, NY 11958 Farmingdale, NY 11735 LAJIBRDA LLC B&J REALITY 53 Northwest Drive P.O. Box 198 Northport, NY 11768 Peconic, NY 11958 MARINA TSOKANOS, GREGORY C. WESTERLUND STEVEN & ELAINE KOKKINOS 41640 Route 25 P.O. Box 229 Peconic, NY 11958 Peconic, NY 11958 ADOLPH &THERSA A. WESTERLUND ELAINE LATHAM 41700 Route 25 P.O. Box 264 Peconic, NY 11958 Peconic, NY 11958 SCOTT DESIMONE/ DAVID LAFRENIERE MELISSA J. HYATT-DESIMONE 910 Tuthill Road Ext 41780 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Peconic, NY 11958 LIL EMILY ROSE CORP. THOMAS D. GRATTAN, JR. 41965 Route 25 P. O. Box 465 Peconic, NY 11958 Peconic, NY 11958 EUGENE G. & MARY ELLEN GRIMES PELLEGINI PECONIC LLC P.O. Box 503 23005 Route 25 41705 Route 25 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Peconic, NY 11958 SLAMA CHARLES REV TRUST 45 Prince's Pine Road Norwalk, CT 06850 BERRY & BERRY LLC 41535 Route 25 Peconic, NY 11958 U.S. Postal Service,r CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only:No Coverage Provided) M s cr Postal Service, , COL OFFICIAL l� F RECEIPTm •, . M press" s Cr •. m to Cerefled Fee m j�• �pq C3 Ratum Reoslpt Fee Posbnerk 1"• F 1 C •I A USE E C3 (EndoraemeM Repaired) Here co M Reetrktad DSIMry Fss m Postage S O (E or M Rpulred) � '✓ (L Certified FN N Total Postage a Fess $ 5 ru p Return Receipt Fe• i p (Endorsement Repaired) Ir ` ` SLAMA CHARLES REV TRUST p Restricted Deeiery Fee N WPo, 45 Prince's Pine Road ..... C3 (Endorsement Rpulrsd) --- -5-, er N Total Postage&Fele $ Irl � ^ a Norwalk, CT 06850 "........ `D "' ADOLPH & THERSA A. Cr V)ESTERLUND ru -_ -. - - I p SireeG. tr ` ° BERRY & BERRY LLC o PoF 41700 Route 25 - o a' 41535 Route 25 Peconic, NY 11958 ��te: Peconic, Y 11958 $ -- Total Poefaaa 8 Fess - +" _ ru PELLEGINI PECONIC LLC Total Postage a Faee r To � `�I Q 23005 Route 25 --- ru PHYLLIS CA ALANO C3 enr C3 arPoB Cutchogue, NY 11935 o _ 45 =F� '` curse o,POI Far735 D- L1-Jf,f'AWi THOMAS D. GRATTAN:'JR': C3 ru Total Posage C--)ttiP. O. Box 465 remit EUGENE G. & MARY ELLEN Peconic, NY 11958 en+T° D- GRIMES ----- O or Po Bo p orP0BOx P.O. Box 503 m Total PostageBFeesI$ �, , -- r` came: 41705 Route 25 ru SCOTT DESIMONE It enf ° Peconic 8 NY 119 C3 -••-••- MELISSA J. HYATT-DESIMONE ....... or 41780 m lPostage&Fese rp. or POE 41780 Route 25 ru C3 DAVID LAFRENIERE CWSh Peconic, NY 11958 C3 - ----•• ------- Ire 54reetA .,ey —1 1 p orpos 910 Tuthill Road Ext N ru .....-.. CIN Ste Southold, NY 1ru 19- 1 m Toted Postage B Fees $ �, 15 "' en+ o B&J REALITY ■ Compete Items t,2,and 8. comPlete — Ir ... . P.O. Box 198 Item 41f Fle WC%d DSIWY Is dOWmd. G p or set AP ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X r oi°OBo Peconic, NY 11958 so that we can return the card to you. f !Verus)jqgit�t C. Dad �a ■ Attach this card to the hack of the mailp Re�Nepgy Lo—V— or on the front if space permits. D. Is del�Neryy addrom Meront fro tem 1? L, - r 1. Amelia Addrseestl to: If YES,ender dalNery address below: C co Total Poetics&Fees $ t:-. {` t ru on GREGORY C. WESTERLUND ELAINE LATHAM D" W. 41640 Route 25 ___ • P.O. Box 264 p aF Peconic, NY 11958 cy Peconic, NY 1195 aSe�°Type A 1RCettlged Mail O Express Mail IL _ C]Reglatered C]Retum Receipt for ry,1 ❑Insured Mail []c.o.D. Er �n+ro LIL EMILY ROSE CORP. 7 a. Restricted Delivery?PftFors) Io S"Bef• � 41965 Route 25 4 ••• 7 9 2820 0002 8338 9427 r` ctyse Peconic, NY 1195 - so 2. Amkkite Number ••-- maneYrhan aervice rscsD PS Form 3811.Febmq 2004 Domestic Return Receipt to a z 13 0 ( ❑ ❑ ❑ r s o Q. Ec ■ Complete Items .2,and 3.Also complete A $ 13130 Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired. ru ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X C o a a so that we can return the card toou. $ ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 9� _ ONanre) C%Dei ' F o or on the front•d space permits. C3 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is del 'address d■erent from Item 17 [3❑ ¢ .a If YES,enter delivery address below. ❑ ru MARINA TSOKANOS, a o E it STEVEN & ELAINE KOKKINOS o o 171 P.O. Box 229 m Peconic, NY 11958 3. Type > ',g Cermw Mall ❑Bpass Mail • E� m o E ❑Registered ❑Return Receipt for 81. o t ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 3 m o"o� Z }y{ 4. Restricted Delivery?(dree Fee) ❑ Cd1 � Q 00 Fi 2. Article Number .01-0 o i n (T,a„�,ftr, bw 7009 2820 0002 8338 9472 ��-a AS a Q n vE{ PS Form 3511,February 2004 Domestic um Receipt 10256 ° 8 to y E E p v Z ■ Complete Items 1 2fC 3 Also canplete 8 u e • r c $b Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is dashed. ❑ m g ;r `n O U § cD ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑ as R. m C so that we can return UM CBRd to o ■ Attach thia.cmd to the beat of themailPieoe, B. R by Nemo) C. - £� o O O (J a or on the Lent if specs Pam*& ■ ■ ■ T .. LL d D. Is delivery address different from Ran l7 _ 1. Article Addressed to: R VES,enter delivery address below: ❑ ■ P iYl:_L15 CATALANO 013 ❑❑ ❑ �.5 L)oud Street D- 1-cern;ingd,ole, NY 11735 s ciO r0 / •raMY 13Mail 9JeoAratYae CD owned ❑Return n Receipt for M • 1 do Red Ettrytrase � � p owm -_ __ -- -- - sured Mall 13C.O.D. ❑❑[3m 13 In 4. Restricted Delivery!f-SAr■s Feel ❑ _ ru 2. Article Number 7009 2820 0002 8338 9373 $„ o mamA = L aterfmrnservcebw F Ps Foran 3811,February 2004 Domestic Receipt low ❑❑ N ■ Complete herr■1,2,and 9 Ak0 dbmpIets A a d Cd v Co Kern 4xRestricted D*wylsdeeha 1. 0 ■ Print your name and mldrlieW Ute reverse X ❑ U- so that we can return the card to you. o by(PdrltMNana) C. Data ■ Attach this card to the beck of the mallplece, 1 b o N or on the frond It space permits. a D. Is delivery address d■erent from Ran 17 ❑ ❑ 'S. . 1. Article Addressed to R YES,enter delivery address below: • m E 21 . L-PH & THERSA A. a 0'g" ,NESTERt.UND .19r �$ 00 ,1 00 Route 25 3 �°TAMN8 "e 01 '„conic, NY 11958 I3C•rReedman ❑Express man q g= gQ _ ^ 2 ❑Registered 13 Return Receipt for MI • Z ❑Insured Mail 13 C.O.D. Ila at.■,� a 4. Restricted Delivery!(Extra Fee) ❑ o .� M 2. Article Number 7009 2820 0002 8338 9359 ' r::E ° ”' o mansferftmairmbebw Ps Form 3811,Febmary 2o04 Domestic Rttun Reiisipt .... ■ ■ ■ P1 k IS z �) - °° ° k ° Ci �E Ti p $ S 11 Co 8 M • Complete Mems 11 2,and 3.Also completeA c Item 4 If Restricted Dellvery is desired. � [3 � � Q � .a ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑: • 11L °°° m so that we can return the card to you. a o0 • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, S' Received by(Printed Nene) At Date, a on the front M apace permits. Q - o 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery addlms dMmant flan item l l ❑. b o If YES,entardelk"address below: 13p u B&J REALITY ti P.O. Box 198 X o d m to ru Peconic, NY 11958 D- 3. S e'Npe p WCeltified Mae ❑fess Mail p 13 Registered ❑Retum Receipt for ml o, w r Cl Insured Mail 13C.O.D. E '� Z 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑ o c 2. Article Number 7009 2820 0002 8338 9397 ; .A �I � _ w (rlane/el fNfn 9BlVlCa Jet" Yyy g PS Form 3811,February 2004 Do Return Receipt 10250 $ 3 LLJ O LO d m o. $ N .2Efi � Q N �! • CanrpleMlhmst, 1kd r Ahs carytlste j A. nen.a E Rem 4IFAIdcledgMvyiskheYed. X �!O • H� w Z r ■ Print Your and address on the reverse CC(���ffj rJ Q U •- 9othatYysk•ttReWntlMootdtcyou. S. Received try(PdntedNene) C. 8v $•Tu $ F- v> C z c°9i ■ Attach this card to the book d the meilplece, a C 9 r N O Or on the hod N I. Artlde AddressedtieP D. h delivery address d•exrt from Item 1? • 00 $• $ 0 I If YES,errtW delivery Wdress below. _ CL 01. ❑ I SLAMA CHARt£S REV TRUST d� rs m 45 Prince's Pine Road Norwalk, CT 06850 WiDDeraeed Me ❑Express Mall ❑Registered ❑Retun Receipt for ° ° 171 m 13 Insured mall E3C.O.D. 4. Restricted DdNW(Extra Fee) ❑ �, It ru p 2. Article armlbrNumber 7009 2820 0002 8338 9434 • $ $ o M (gansleom aerMos hbeq y • $ � p � PS Form 3811,February 2004 Return Receipt ,szsed $ )p b : °° ru ■ Complete Meme 1,2,and 3.Also completeCO Mem 4 n Restricted Dellmy Is desired. 13d X m d ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑ Q 80 that We Can return the Card t0 you. B. eceNed (Punted Name) C. Date k O ■ Attach this card to the back d the mailplece, _ o or on the front M space permits. m I` D. le dsllvery address dreer,t from Item 17 ❑1 1. Article Addressed to: E If YES,enter delNery address below: ❑r E m o E $ £8 � EUGENE G. & MARY ELLEN w '3RIMES a m V) L RLU .0. B(-,x 503 a. Seylcerype N$�E9 � N 1 705 Route 25 %Wc«nneamail ❑Express mail 8 j N } ❑Registered ❑Retum Receipt for Ake PP(-onic, NY 11958 Z LL ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted DBINery4(Ekes Fee) ❑` Q L rip dOcrz kis 2' Article NumberX009 2820 0002 8338 9410 e $ '0 N P3 Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt , 0 Is ■ G 0- av •eAiie.y.dall illIdWIII t hIlIIM, I—L 1)"PL ETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY J ■ oompw ft=1,2,and a Alao oarplete A. Slpshee 4< i inks 4 w Raetricted odvary la neared. X 0 Agent 4and address on the reverse 0 Addressee Ya+flrafie 1.. , W tra can wm the card to you. B. ReCelved by(P~Nerve) C. Date of Delivery y ti orad to the heck of the m ilplece, 4 titsltorttNapecspemllta D. Iedelveryaddress dfferentnomlteml? Oyes AABaaaed to If YES,enter delivery address below: 0 No . 1 B RRY & BERRY LLC 41535 Route 25 Peconic, NY 1 1958 L4RestrIcW WADOTpe Kwaied Mall 0 Ems Mau ed O RegisterReturn Receipt for merchandise ,.. Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. 'th- s .` r Delivery?(ode Pee) 0 Yes =` 2. Article Nuroer _ 7009 2820 0002 8338 9441 Mwxfarawnaerv/okw !; PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 1025951W-W1540: i SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete Rema 1,2.and 3.Also complete A. SIgliawrs Rem 4 R Restricted DelNay Is desired. 0 Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X 0 ' so that we can return the card to you. B. Received try(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the neck of the mailpiece, or on the front R apace permits. D. is delivery address dMerert from item 1? 0 Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: 0 No LIL EMILY ROSE CORP. 41965 Route 25 �1tiPeconic, NY 11958 3. Type .. CarWied Mau 0 Express Mail O Registered 0 Realm Receipt for Memharldise 0 Insured Mau 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted DelNert?(Ektra Fee) 0 Yee 2. Article Number 7009 2820 0002 8338 9465 (Ranseer tom servke bagel) PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-WIS40'... + w ' Vendor No. Check No. Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher Vendor Name Vendor Address Entered by or,-,--x>V-1A .L a , Audit Date VendoT ephone umber - 1 ' U? 9 Towa Clerk Vend ontact Invoice Invoice Invoice Net Purchase Order ..- • Number Date Total Discount 'Amount Claime Number Description of Goods or Services Genetat Ledger Fund and Amon, Nund.. r� • II Payee Certification Department Certification The undersigned(Claimant)(Acting on behalf of the above named claimant) I hereby certify that the materials above specified have been received by me does hereby certify that the foregoing claim is true and correct,that no part has in good condition without substitution,the services properly ban paid,except as therein stated,that the balance therein stated is actually performed and that the quantities thereof have been verified with the exceptions due and owing,and dd)that taxes from _which the Town is exempt are excluded. or discrepancies noted,and payment is approved. Signature `� �M"��"l Title 6�'`J^'� 7� Signatures Company Name / x� Date ��C.S"�� TitleY_�^.�Dine C L i Date n1 i 0 Client: Southold NY Metro PCS Invoice 165 Peconic Lane Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5.14.1 The Center for Municipal Solutions Invoice#:55141-002 70 Cambridge Dr. Glenmont, NY 12077 Date: Description (518)439-3079 Hrs Rate: Expenses. Amount 10-Aug prepare for meeting with Applicant and client 0.3 $ 250.00 $ 75.00 1/4 of time attend meetings with applicant,town staff and 11-Aug town attorney 0.6 $ 250.00 $ 150.00 11-Aug 1/4 of travel time 2.4 $ 125.00 $ 300.00 11-Aug 1/4 of tolls $ 6.89 11-Aug 1/4 of meals $ 10.97 11-Aug 1/4 of mileage 121 @$.50 per mile $ 60.50 review email and notes on 8/11 meeting from Wnser and 23-Aug speak to her 0.5 $ 250.00 $ 125.00 23-Aug draft recommendation letterto Board and discuss with Re' 1.2 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 1,028.36 $ 78.36 $ 950.00 I, Richard A.Comi,certify that the above account in the amount of $ 1,028.36 is true and correct;that the items,services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated;that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes,from which the municipality is exempt,are not included;and that the amount claimed is actually due. 9/1/2010 R-A (Electronic Signature) Date Signature 1'i, 75i7J 10 12. 4:3 FAH (,o2/013 Rt,NIELSEN,HUBER & COUGHLIN,LLP ATTORNEYS AT 1.AW 30 NORTH NEW YOEx AVENUE HvNrsNOTVN, NEW YORE 11743 TELEr80NE: (931) 425-4100 Feosum LE: (931) 425-4104 On GovnenL WILLIAM J.NIEL®En October t 5,2010 BY HAND and FACSIMILE Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Plainer 'town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE; MetroPCS New York,LLC(Site No.NY 7315) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Cane(a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic,New York 11958 3CTM# 1000—75—5 — 14.1 Dear Ms- Winser As you are aware, we arc the attorneys for MetroPCS New York, CCC ('MetrOPCS') with respect to the captioned matter. Pursuant to the requirements found in the Town of Southold Town Code § 55.1, enclosed herewith please find the following: L Executed Affidavit of Posting; 2. Laecuted Affidavit of Mailing*; 3. Copy of the legal notice sent to owners Of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public Or private street from the subject property, which notice was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested: 4. List of property owners of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the subject property: 5. Certified mail receipts;and 6 Return receipt green cards,received to date. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Vey truly yours. RE,NIELSEN,HUBER&COL'GHLIN, LLP I By: tubi J. COO .IJC/ts Ends. U/15!2010 12 42 FAv L�j001/Ola RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 North New York Avenue Huntington,New York 11743 Telephone: (631)4254100 Facsimile: (631)425-4104 Of Counsel: William J. Nielsen TELECOPY TO THE FOLLOWING NUMBER: (631) 765-3136 NAME: Town of Southold Planning Board RE: Notice of Public Hearing for MetroPCS (Site No. NY 7315) Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Applications for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic, NY (SCTM# 1000— 75 —5 — 14.1) FROM: Tracy Sorensen DATE: October 15, 2010 MESSAGE: Originals to be provided at Public Hearing TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 13 (Including Cover Page) PLEASE NOTE The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive such information. If the recipient is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,or if any problems occur with transmission, please notify us immediately by telephone at(631) 425-4100. Thank you. 10i'15!2010 12-44 FAX la 003/013 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This Is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 48405 Route 25), Peconic, NY ; SCTMN 1000-75-5-14.1 by placing the Town's official poster notice(s)within /0 feet of the front property line facing the street(s)where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained In place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on Monda October 18, 2010. Your Name (print) Signature Address Un__„N�� W15116 6 Date Sworn to before 37/V 15th day of October, 2010 Notary P blic saw PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS 6 GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY. 12:00 noon, Fri., 10115/10 Re: Pro osed Site PI r troPCS NY LLC at the Southold Town Police Station SCTM#a: I QQQ-75-6-14.1 Date of Public Hearing: Monday.October 18, 2010. 8:10 p.m. 10/15/201Q 12 '. 44 FAX • 00Q4/013 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING. ._ 105 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41405 Route 25), Peconic, NY - SCTM# 1000-75-5-14.1 On OHQay, October 8, 2010, 1 have sent notices, by cord led mall — return recelp%the receipts and groan return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which Is across on Peconic Lane and Route 25 a k .a Main Road Your Name (p ret) SigiWe 3J�, ✓y.rIL, nip aYt� - k k- L _ 072 11 -7Y-3 Address 2- DlD Data Sworn to afore me this 8th of Oct: er, 2010 � o Notery Pub Ic , DORO A. LARD Notary Publlb, Stats of NOW York No. 01 BE6036B10 Ouaimed In Suffolk County Commisalon Expires Feb.7. 0 PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS d GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon. F[1.. 10/16110 Re: Prowned Site Plan for MetroPCS NY LLC at the ftuthold Town P2kq %soon SCTM*: 1000-764-14.1 Date of Public Hearing: Monday, October 18. 2010. 6:10 D.M. 10%15/2010 12 44 FAX 005/0 13 • Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan & special exception consideration; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R•80 Zoning District; 4. That the application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2"0 FI., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. The Planning Board Office will be closed on Monday, October 11th 6. Information can also be obtained via the internet by sending an e-mail message to: Carol.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us; 7. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday. October 18, 2010 at 6:10 p.m. In the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: MetroPCS NY, LLC at the Southold Town Police Station Date: 9/15/10 ln/15/2010 13:44 FAX 00()6/013 LIST OF OWNERS OF RECORD FOR PROPERTIES WHICH ABUT OR ARE ACROSS FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET FROM 165 PECONIC LANE, PECONIC, NY(SCTM p 1000—75—5—14.1) JILL BLUM PHYLLIS CATALANO P_O. Box 151 45 Doud Street Peconic, NY 11958 Farmingdale, NY 11735 LAJIBRDA LLC B&J REALITY 53 Northwest Drive P.O. Box 198 Northport, NY 11768 Peconic, NY 11958 MARINA TSOKANOS, GREGORY C. WESTERLUND STEVEN & ELAINE KOKKINOS 41640 Route 25 P.O. Box 229 Peconic, NY 11958 Peconic, NY 11958 ADOLPH &THERSA A. WESTERLUND ELAINE LATHAM 41700 Route 25 P.O. Box 264 Peconic, NY 11958 Peconic, NY 11958 SCOTT DESIMON E/ DAVID LAFRFNIERE MELISSA J. HYATT-DESI MON E 910 Tuthill Road Ext 41780 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Peconic, NY 11958 LIL EMILY R05E CORP. THOMAS D. GRATTAN,JR. 41965 Route 25 P_ 0. Box 465 Peconic, NY 11958 Peconic, NY 11958 EUGENE G. & MARY ELLEN GRIMES PELLEGINI PECONIC LLC P.O. Box 503 23005 Route 25 41705 Route 25 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Peconic, NY 11958 SLAMA CHARLES REV TRUST 45 Prince's Pine Road Norwalk, CT 06850 BERRY & BERRY LLC 41535 Route 25 Peconic, NY 11958 1i1 15/2014 1^:44 F4 h' • Z4Ai%ill 3 • ServiceU.S. Postal ( Postal CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT ICERTIFIED MAIL RECFlPT I- M I a M cc ' ff, Ir OFFICIAL SE OFFICIAL USE m m PORI" ! m Ptmr m do CUNNI FMGmM1d FM o N ReWWd pAq I Po• d Rolm Recelpl Fee .;i - :i Poo g m (End•mrwa RW Fm 1 Nom• G (01d•nemrl Regan O NRfE eeWcM.Dd G (E=mRagWem) - p _ $ N /•�� ) N --- - cc Taal P"".a Fer 5 , 7 `I gu Tow PmWW a Fee! � . 9J PHYLLIS CATALANO N N ir BERRY & BERRY LLC 45 Doud Street o a; ED ED ,xpol o 41535 Route 25 ___ ��( Farrringdale, NY 11735 " Peconic, NY 119585 .. U.S Postal Service U.S. Postal Sei vice CERTIFILL) MAIL RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT a o Mail only No 1,15411-4111,C,,vo,,r7eS 7- OFFICIAL USE n OFFICIAL USE mpma• , OFeeble ! - � GmMOFee Comm"FM �� � � N _G PFWfYIN U O Realm Reeapt Fee ryem 7 '1p 1 Fe• PoeenuN IEnoprmna RepuNetl) 7 fE,mwrmem � .RIW O RrmeMd Oellvery Fa ' 7 RrYM1eo OeXYery Fr fEMgrmam ReovNetl) (E eR•Rm RpWme) OJ~— N / " Ll towpmageaFre $ � U N ��EUGENE G. & MARY ELLEN tr SLAMA CHARLES REV TRUST C3 GRIMES - 3 °°�' 45 Prince's Pine Rood w�B•• P.O. Box 503 __.. R" cm,sala 41705 Route 25 Norwalk, CT 06850 ---' P ni NY 1 1958 i Postal CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT U1 (VOlne5liC Mail Only;No Insurance Covera � Cov,,,��pl,,O,d) ge Provided) 03 (Donjosi,Mail Onj,No I, ,,e Xe Er Ir to OFFICIAL USE OFFICIAL USE m m m Page 9 �`i 1 m P.- ! M N CeMlee Fee ;� N Gmeee Fr ,�j%4Pwimert O Baum Rwelq Fr n © Relm Reeelp Fr pO (Eneemem ,RegYlme) „ry( ^V _ QO (E.dwrmeMReiY4•e) r� 11ep,a Fm O (Enreery�bmnU�IRaVYIrod) ) W` (E CGeemenl lR�'pYul�.d) ru W Tblel PaeMle a Fen ru $ . L) ep TOW1 PeeMye a FNe $ , N N r °"` LIL EMILY ROSE CORP. Er DAVID LAFRENIERE o -6:K 41965 Route 25 4 I� aPo� e.F�a 910 Tuthill Road Ext crs:a Peconic, NY 11958 Southold, NY 11971 1 10/15/2010 1^_ A4 FAX • a0 8!,)13 US Postal Service U.SPo CERTIFIEDstal Service RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTI G •' .0 .D u m m OFFICIAL USE ! � OFFICIAL _-' E m m co ru Gdlwd Fw �' N O (EndproemwRB°eq�• v P� G (Endam dRpd/� �yS' Ilr■ ,Zrftd ,S 4 (Eatlommm t�Id" Wt �R roR Fw . ru c ca TetU Pay■gpa Fm ru$ -__,.`,� .0 TeylPwlmeaFew "a PELLEGINI PECONIC LLC C3 THOMAS ro D. GRATTAN, °r ' 23005 Route 2511191: o bwa erPoe Cutchogue, NY 11935 aM4 Peconic. NY 11958 ""�° i Postal •• CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT a TIFIFD e, MAIL RECEIPT m c uT m m Ir OFFICIAL USE go OFFICIAL USE m m m Poppe s , ' --�•--:, m Postpe m CE) Groaed Fm ru Gropes Pe• O RNYfiI RewlplFw A N 7 Q (Eneenemem Requiz (�� N•e O penes Rwelp FM C3 (6wmw='n Repu40) - (� G (E wMmwMdH Ind \ 4 ryRwmWd Gwery iw _ % G equ ) r (•-- Q dmeeawe gpyhp) /.� ND Tett'POWAW A Fw• ni Y .7 �"I cc TOW Pp.my.a r%,ru Ir „„ SCOTT DESIMONE / n' Ir ADOLPH & THERSA A: .... ..MELISSA J. HYATT-DESIMONE .. o . IESTERLUND C3 iilfe.Z; 4 316wl,• N wR7F 41780 Route 25 r �-P-°f 41700 Route 25 -� Peconic, NY 11958 Pe Cc NY 11958 Postal CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT na � � RECEIPT r FMai( I r Q• OFFICIAL USE co OFFICIAL- USE n POOP a m C (T( Pw■pe a umW Fes ,a `y Pwlmen GMMd Fes ] RaMn ReedPl Fw N (endon.m•n Ryulndl ::/ �p�u p Realm RewPlFes �'L'llwwro 3 Rwalped DeIIwYFes J p (Emome Requited) Harp' ' (Endarwmenl Repulmd) © RWdftd0m1WWyFWru yed( TOW Pa.,.de p Few $ C.514 '� - '=' �• GREGORY C. WESTERLUND- TM° P°"1pe8pow $ �• 41640 Route 25 n' , a B&J REALITY -F Peconic, NY 11958 0 �,;g— P.O. Box 198 "PCBs Peconic, NY 11958 owl SURMLi 111/'15/20117 12 44 FRR: rgh004/0 13 .� , Postal ru • CERTIFIED MAIL RECLIPT N N r CD � OFFICIAL USE OFFICIAL USE M m m� rodaaa ' rn �C�� m Pw w 0 i"lye tL Postmen ru / A Frohn 1*" w r�i I `4 O Rmum Reap Foo o (Fndw.nO.m Be d) I �1p r) (EmdoneXMlRwwga) W` C - C dwoo Wl Rap he�dl c . ' C3 flail 1 P4*b ed) rLi a TOW Poel•w a F•N h r7 L1 �..--:, low Pwlyoa Fera $ 7L - ru ELAINE LATHAM N 0 P.O. Box 264 -- a- MARINA TSOKANOS, a Peconic., NY 11958 o aroma STEVEN 8 ELAINE KOKKINOS -- .. . ��:�. P.O. Box 229 Peconic, NY 11958 US. Pnstal Service U'S. POS(I)i Sel vice CERTIFIFID MAIL RECEIPT I -0 CERTIFIED MAIL Cr a-i r OFFICIAL USE ca OFFICIAL USE m Pony 0 M Poalrad i corded Fee ' Nv m ru GNd.dw C Rrdon R.wpw /PwonMN N ir� r)P a6riPR- O (EndonsnrY C (Erdo�mostFkw W HIM (E�xknr.nen(DNNxypoQyMO) Jig W� t C C3 C .0 Taal PoRbw a Pow $ru cc Tedd Pww a Fan $ .7 �' - N - 1. ru r JILL BLUM r LAJIBRDA LLC o s5posm P,O. Box 151 mPoea rW5,01 53 Northwest Drive .. ... iWRa Peconic, NY 1 1958 Northport, NY 11768 ......•• 10i15/2-10 12. 44 FAY f�01P/013 et Compats Ihurrra 1,2.and&AWocmplea am a Ir kea libldted DdV&Y a fleshed. p lli t ■ Print your mama and adAaee an the reverse 0 Addmses so thea wa can rel the cold to you., J�FOtby(Pdnbd jW - C Dots of Delbwy' ■ AOaoh this owd to tM back d the mal -a-10 -a-10 or on the fiord n apace pemnlb D. a aahwy wa ve daarerrtAom lam t? 0 Yes t,..Wde Addnmd ED: d YE6,Mter tlehrfy atldwa b@ W.. C3 No THOMAS D. GRAIIAN, JR. P. O. Box 465 Peconic, NY 11958 ceo.a Md_ o spew Map 0Rlim 0Room RoWforMwolrwdb 0.erew MM 0 C.C.D. . 4. grbpdd DslMsry'r�Fey ❑Ybs 2' Arad." ` (mrrwrr anm..rvroe areeq 7009 2620 0002 9338 6907 P8 Fam 3011,February 2x04 Omission Raven Real" taAeasman f ass Is Com iste.lam 1.&erd&Neo oornplate p A asm 4 M F1eOri Domy Is do*o& O All"Addiu + 'im,Plot ym r mace end wdlsee On the mverss eo drat we oerr raWm tlw card m yor>: was by(P!k'rkd New* C Daft d D*my M Ataoh two cold to the book d to mdpaae, Blum is I Z-1 e cr on thb front If epees permlb. o. in delivery o ess MWITUonr Nm W 0 lbs 1, Amick Ad*mmd tot If YES.OW hpeiy address below. 0 No JILL BLUM P.Or. Box 151 Pe conic, NY 11958 a. or >S�e oereW illi 1301 Md . 0 ft"W d 0 RAmm Reotlpt forMOIctmdss 13,6newad Mal 0 C.O.D. 4. ResMaad DYNwyf P"Fill 13 Yb 2.ArtldaNumber 7009 2820 0002 8338 9496 @nrmlrAem mnks mw *8 Form 3811,'FdmWry:2004 - OWrAmW Ream PAMPt lonoual w imo INN f tbmpl'ea lhenle 1.2,end 8.Nso ocmpkde. 7D.lodeKwy 713 TamaM tieatrtated DNlvoly N dewed. besese■ Pdrtt.ym rnwm and addrom Ondro reverseso that we man teWm the cord to you. 7=mjdm peeish'■ Modh We oold to the back d the mellpleee,Won theRentK apace parmha. a 1. MedeAddnnsd to; o I ELAINE LATHAM j P.O. Box 264 pE,.conic, NY 11958 e. as9dae rip z'CCwtlAw Men 0 OW Mao 0 Roof 13 Rslum ResNet farfAmC idles 1 ❑Ineumd MIA 0 C.O.D. A. RMWW WWW 0" 13 Me 2. MiceNm4w 7009 2820 0002 8338 9427 - mww*nomWWW nbsF PS Forin 3811,Folmoll y 2004 Dorraeec Rwan ReCwpt ,oeme-m-rktsa 111j1F,:,111p 1 -'45 FAX f�611 rG 1._t • ■ C*Toft RemA 1,2,rd 8.Also crnpleM A A. en Kam 4 N Rsablchd Ddwy to dnhd. dd ■ Print your nae and address on the roverea D Adasaea m so that we can return the CW010 ycu. & AfnW Nemr G Date o1 D*my ■ Athah this card tb the book of tM 0101100Cs, /40-9-/o or on the front K apsca pernift 0,r dNhnn,adders CXrwMrtftm lrm 17 0 Yr 7. Adler pddNeead to: K Yom,erdr dNlwry add'ess below: a No FUGENE G. & MARY ELLEN GRIMES P.Q. Br.,x 503 a e ye.IV" n1705 Route 25 4ro~MW ° No Q pAgWrrod D Rehm Rsoalpt for Merohrallr PPconic, NY 11958 DIMbnld Mr DGo.D. �. Fteablelsd DWWW Aft F" D Yr 2. AradaNmntir 7009 2820 0002 8338 9410 f 'donr rrl4q�ls� PO Form 3811.Fahnaty 2004 r saga Rates'FhKWtaaessaa+w+en al.Compbla hater 1,2,arrd L Is MM 70ftm-M Mm 41fAeebhad Dd1mY n' 7 ■ PrKttyournrmand addrsas on tlr ravrwaras..so that we am wim Yr card to you. d by(R WW MWrW i p Adtaofr this cord to ft book of the mdplses, 1.'r- IC-3 - or an sirskootIspecsperrift D. N devise edAerdRerwRlrpnt barn 17 12,yes ' 1� kftw Addivesoc m _ K YE&ardor dolhory eddies baba 0 No SLAMA CRAKES REV TRUST 45 Prince's Pine Road Norwalk, CT 06850 0.90 t HOW Mag D, MM Mr ❑RaM111ad 13RaeanFA0111fafi+r MMdIBndNs 0 Inrnd Mag D O.D.D. 2. nmdaewm 7009 2820 0002 8338 9434 Mtinl WftonsrrYeah6�q r PS Frm 3811,FdxUlW y 2W4 oanlslr Reim ReOslpl 1aXaeC2A419�o ■ Carnph 1 Kehr 1.2.and S.Also arrplets A Kern 4 K Ihablohd l dewy M desired, X - G Anesae ■ PrKtt yore nems and address rl the weans so that we Can rehrm the card to you, ftecehed by(Footed Name) C Drs d DdNeryi, r Much ft to the becK of the mailplece, 6 .12-10 fro or an the M K space peen te. D.'r d*my sddnr dKsrsn ftm Rem 1? ❑Yeo'' l 1. Mar AddWW ta: K YES.nor del"addner bdow.. 0 Nd-: I B&J REALITY 1 P.O. Box 198 Peconic, NY 11958 aTps t wvw MdI M ftren Mag ❑HoWsirsd D Ratum FIWWot for Mwdrndkm C3 Inrnd Meg a C.OD. 4.'RnblcrdD KWO(M 1%4 0y ' 2. "^Me'N1A10er 7009 2820 0002 8338 9397 mrrhr dom sew"kbM -------------------- P6 Form 3811.February 2004 Domosuo Ronan PACGO +�•�+*+� 10/15/2010 12 45 FAX fir 1' ; 11 • CC 4rOe�b $and&Alp*MOM ram A oNwry Is barlrea X ■ Print your name end address on the raverem AddSwr p tat we Wen realm the Card to you, pby mAy r. of ■ Attach thus read to the heck of ftmaMplece l v pq. �. ` or at the fort d epeoe pearl �. 1. Article Addressed to: a Ie deAwry sleirm dffma fmm im m 14 w a vis.wmrdown aderessbeiow: 13No ` G.?EGORY C. WESTERLUND 41640 Route 25 Peconic, NY 11958 a lype WbOSW Met C1 beans Mee .. 0 pAgwoW O 0shm Reoelpklar Macharrdee O riuraad Mia O C.O.D. 4, Re9Mcwd DNweyI pvt Feel O Mr P. kddmNvmbw 7009 2820 0002 8338 9403 :1 (AsmArBeraalMgAebep i, . , '. P8 Form 3811, ... .. Fattruary 2004, Daanrla RMun ,,. , ,aaeaeae+4.tama ■ Complete wins 1,2,and S..Ah*oompkft Iban 4 0 RW*ftd DOW Is dsNnd. O Aar, in Pufnt your name and address an eve MMarM X 0 Addressee' so that we can rwtm the Will to you. a ( Akrml) C.Data of 6067 ■ Attach ft owd to the back of the msOphroe, or on ft front it apace pem ft& 1. ArodsAtldrewedm: o, Isdelwryaddress rafiarnMeml7 use If YES,anter datmery address below: O No. SCOTT DESIMONE / MELISSA J. HYATT-DESIMONE 41780 Route 25 ayp. Peconic, NY 11958 WCwWW Mil C3Bpw Mia O PAOmW O RMum ReoNpl for Madnsrdhe 0 Ireuad Mdl O C.O.D. 4. PWWWad Ddvwfl M*v FeV O Mae 2. Article Number i 7009 2820 0002 8338 9380 PS Form 3811,Pebrury 2004 Coneeeo Return Recelpr raeearaarrlsto ■ Conpleh Mame 1,2,end S.Also complete A Item 41f Rwtrt led DWWVy IsX dashed. O Agent ■ PHrd your nwrw sW adder on fM reeeme 0 AdOWNIN eo that we can tehrn the Ward to you. by rpdaw final c. ■ Attach thus card to ft beck Of the mellpiece, a U la or on the front M epee$pemtRa. 1. Article AddmMldfe:., O. WYE111is yadeldwyFara%from sen 17 OYaa t YFE,ansa detvary eddrew MIDW: DNC THERSA A. 'AE'nTERL.UND r! 100 Route 25 5• Two 'c conic, NY 11958 arcwtHadmail 130 Mal O RepOtepW 0 RaWm Fftdpt for March ncliss 0 haumd Md 13 C.O.D. 4. PAw**od DeINer1R On FeN 0 Yes 2. Article Number . . 7049 2820 0,002 8338 9359 (IIMNM'edm 4ervheteeep + PS Forrn 3811,February 2004 Domeodc Hdtrid --d 1!)/1512010 12:45 FAX • Z013/013 • OCIMPkft bm 1,,Z and&AM otmpMaa 9A. n hem 4 h RupfotedX , r PrMt yaro0rrwrid Mon th@ rvmnd 13,yd„a,. eo tlfat vW OM labs„11,s cmd to you. 8 / ( aAymy DMr/&MY a Atm h tlda and to the back of the mldlpboe, Cr - o cron ffM Rant h epada prmlt / ,. Arddh A,dderiaad to; D, hdNhwy WdmadR ftmrmn,7 CYw If YEA Mehr ddN"addrw t,Nmr. Q No MARINA TSOKANOS, STEVEN & ELAINE KOKKINOS P.O. Box 229 Peconic, NY 11958 13Raah,aW dwnMeReoolptfWMMdWdW 13' -11 Mdl 0 CAA. C PACU hd D*W M►a FW WAN 2. . AradaNdm t1hAA1'awn;4rtvr* Ndahtrp 7009 2820 0002 8338 9472 . PS Form 3811,FaWm 2004 - Da,erdc Realm •- - ,oaaao-aa*.,Mo cavww Meer'1;? �jb 01 RE,NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ` ATTORNEYS AT LAW C, A'� 36 NORTH NEW YORE AVENUE V HUNTINGTON, NEW YORE 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 GP GOUBBBL WILLIwx J.NIELSEN October 8, 2010 BY HAND and E-Mail Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner 2010 Town of Southold Planning Board i Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York,LLC (Site No. NY 7315) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic, New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75 —5— 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: As you are aware, we are the attorneys for MetroPCS New York, LLC (`MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned matter. In anticipation of its public hearing before the Planning Board on October 18, 2010, to further support its application and pursuant to communications with the Town and the Town's consultant, as well as the requirements found in Town Code §§ 280-74B(1)(d) and (e), MetroPCS has prepared updated propagation maps. The propagation maps better reflect the anticipated propagation from the proposed site in that they take into consideration the results of additional testing and analysis conducted by MetroPCS. Enclosed herewith are the following revised propagation maps resulting from same. 1. Nine (9) sets of propagation maps prepared by Nicholas Balzano, Radio Frequency Engineer for MetroPCS, dated September 28, 2010, which include: a. Map 1, depicting the existing coverage; b. Map 2, depicting the -75 dBm coverage to be provided by the proposed site; c. Map 3, depicting the-75 dBm coverage to be provided by the proposed site together with proposed neighboring sites; d. Map 2, depicting the -85 dBm coverage to be provided by the proposed site; e. Map 3, depicting the -85 dBm coverage to be provided by the proposed site together with proposed neighboring sites; f Map 2, depicting the-95 dBm coverage to be provided by the proposed site; and g. Map 3, depicting the-95 dBm coverage to be provided by the proposed site together with proposed neighboring sites. y • • • Town of Southold Planning Board MetroPCS at Penny Lumber, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY Site Plan/Special Exception Applications October 8, 2010 Page 2 of 2 Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing,please communicate with the undersigned. Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER& COUGHLIN, LLP By: J. CoubCin JJC/ts Encls. cc: Richard Comi, Center for Municipal Solutions (Via E-mail, w/enclosures) OR 40 UTHO(0 k4 V- 'RF OISTR0G 0 .. SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT N). BOX 908. s()UnI(AD, ,N.Y. Ii<)-, i Sra 30 2010 611 ) -, ()-)-410') � 1 FAX iOS 1 � 705-50-10 September 29, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: MetroPCS at the Southold Town Police Station Dear Kristy: Please be advised that the Board of Fire Commissioners have reviewed the above mentioned site plan and special exception application and found that there is adequate fire protection for this property. The Board would like to reserve the right to review the above site plan if any changes occur to this property or to other property in the immediate area. Sincerely, Carol A. Miller Fire District Secretary 9949 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successively, commencing on the 7th day of October, 2010. Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this day of U wqx--1 2010. d' F�✓ , t ,�'t5050 t G o fa Sue Goum, tY1" ate ' MY Commicvu --1, r�o'acrV 28, 2011 hosed taU`ne{r MV for IlegY#� ot;at6d on P i 7C5ii� fiaa�'of �4a 'uid " ' �Sn�tate'erF.tJew t a o fh Id opd-uty of �� oi°k'4un- - Pbliffd�ts'1i90U=2�9� 5�d.., � edbt`tL'P�g,z$rSPOpal dratron fof honl 'X65 PeFonn Lane;Pecbnic, Td$3i^ f Sau4��qofd; County bC"SdHo7k, t4P' 3{5t'k Suffolk Cuuyig`Tb .fir§f�a5-5 Id 1 y4.. ,>fmd'opo Sne Plan&$Pedal Exception Conatdeiatibn forYt3etroPCS, Pepny lockted at ll, $bund AveliuE"35T'aftituck; Town Of"3�outLold, County.'of Suffolk;State bI°New'York, S ,county Tax Ma Numbers I000- 2, }IXO F4OFTHESOUTH0LD WN PLANNING�V'QAXD MartinfESidor Cw mab 9949-1T 1011 �;::. :. . • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �QF soul P.O.Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR ��� Southold, NY 11971 Chair y '0 OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Zw- Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G • 0 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI l'�COwn$ Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax:631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 18th day of October, 2010 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Lot Line Change for Charles &Amy Scharf located on Paradise Point Road, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-81-3-25.1 & 26 6:05 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision Aries Estates located at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way which extends north from Kayleigh's Court in East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-22-3-2 6:10 p.m. Proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for MetroPCS, LLC at the Southold Town Police Station located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-75-5-14.1 6:15 p.m. Proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for MetroPCS, LLC at Penny located at 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-141-3-38.1 Dated: 9/20/10 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2010 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times Page 1 of 1 Kalin, Carol From: Legals [legals@timesreview.coml Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:30 PM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: RE: Legal Ad for 10/7 Edition of Suffolk Times Hi Carol, I have received the notice and we are good to go for the 10/7 issue. Thanks and have a great afternoon! Candice -.._..._ ... . _.._.__ . ..__ .._ ._....__., .....,-------._._. ----- From: Kalin, Carol [mailto:Carol.Kalin@town southold.ny us] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 1:16 PM To: Legals Subject: Legal Ad for 10/7 Edition of Suffolk Times Please print the attached legal ad regarding the 10/18 Planning Board hearings for the Scharf Lot Line Change, Aries Estates Standard Subdivision and the Police Station and Penny Cell Towers in the October 7th edition of the Suffolk Times. Kindly confirm receipt by e-mail. Thanks. Carol Kalin, Secretarial Assistant Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Annex, 54375 NYS Rt. 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Carol.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us 9/20/2010 r • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �pf so P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �0� yQ/_ Southold, NY 11971 Chair 'O OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G • 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �Q� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI COU Southold,Southold,NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 18th day of October, 2010 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Lot Line Change for Charles &Amy Scharf located on Paradise Point Road, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-81-3-25.1 & 26 6:05 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision Aries Estates located at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way which extends north from Kayleigh's Court in East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-22-3-2 6:10 p.m. Proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for MetroPCS, LLC at the Southold Town Police Station located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-75-5-14.1 6:15 p.m. Proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for MetroPCS, LLC at Penny located at 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-141-3-38.1 Dated: 9/20/10 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman 0 STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 20th day of September, 2010 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 10/18/10 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Lot Line Change for Charles &Amy Scharf, SCTM#1000-81-3-25.1 & 26 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Standard Subdivision Aries Estates, SCTM#1000-22-3-2 6:10 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for MetroPCS, LLC at the Southold Town Police Station, SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for MetroPCS, LLC at Penny, SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this A�ay of C Q rN ,11010. MELANIE DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLI 01 C,ate of New York 34870 Qualified in Suffolk County Notary Pub commission Expires September 30,�2f� / • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �QF SO(/TP.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �0� 0/_ Southold,NY 11971 Chair �O OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND Q� • �� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKICOUNTY Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Engineer* Southold Town ARC Southold Fire District* From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: September 16,2010 RE: Site Plan & Special Exception Application review—MetroPCS at the Southold Town Police Station • Request for comments pursuant to General Municipal Law §239(as a referral)and Southold Town Code §280-131, and LWRP Coastal Consistency Review. • SEQR Lead Agency request • Coordinated review under SEQR Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to seek comments from your agency, and also to determine lead agency and coordinate review under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA)of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. Please provide the following, as applicable: 1. Comments or requirements the Planning Board should take into consideration while reviewing the proposed project; 2. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated; 3. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; and 4. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency under SEQR. w • • Southold Referral & SEQR Coordination Page Two September 16,2010 The lead agency will determine the need for an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) on this project. Within thirty(30)days of the date of this letter,please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. () This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. () Other(see comments below) Comments: Project Name: MetroPCS at the Southold Town Police Station Address: 165 Peconic Lane Tax Map#: 1000-75-5-14.1 Requested Action: This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix public utility wireless antenna to an existing 131.5 foot lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District. SEQRA Classification: ( )Type I ( )Type II (X)Unlisted Contact Person: Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner (631) 765-1938 Enclosures: • Environmental Assessment Form • Site Plan Application Form • Site Plan(s)(site plans sent only to above agencies indicated by an *) 2 ` V TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Site Plan Name: 1¢etrQPCS at 165 Peconic Lane, PeconiWpplication Date: Suffolk County Tax Map#1000- 75 - 5 - 14.1 Other SCTM#s: Street Address: 165 Peconic Lane Hamlet: Peconic Distance to nearest intersection: Type of Site Plan: New % Amended Residential If Amended,last approval date: SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and hone number for the people below: Property Owner Town of SouthQld Street 53095 Route 25 City Southold State NY Zip 11971 „, Home Telephone Other 631 65-� Applicant MetroPCS New York, LLC rtb 15 2010 Street 5 Skyline Drive CityHawthorne State NY Zip 10532 Home Telephone Other 914 23 3m'85`00`—••.•"` Applicant's Agent or Representative: Attorney for Applicant: Contact Person(s)* R8, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP Street 36 North New York Avenue City Huntington State NY, Zip 11743 Office Telephone 631-425-4100 Other Fax: 631-425-4104 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 Ilk SECTION C: Site Data . • Proposed construction type: New Modification of Existing Structure _Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: 12.27 ac./max Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 180 Mx/sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes_No If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): R-80 Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 09 /29 / 09 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No_x If yes,have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No_ If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: police state on and public utility wireless telecommunications facility List all proposed property uses: Same as existing Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: '5.9 % Proposed lot coverage: 5.90 % Gross floor area of existing structure (s): 33,650 sq.@. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s) Parking Space Data: N/A #of existing spaces: #of proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Yes No - Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 2.55 % Proposed landscape coverage: 2.55 % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500' of a wetland area? Yes No X If yes explain: I,the undersigned, certify th all th information is true. Met PCS w rk Signature ofPreparer: B Date: /U—/ , `U etti Page 3 of 3 NY VP/GM RE,NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEw YORE AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEw YORH 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OP COUNSEL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN September 14, 2010 VIA UPS ) Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair and Members of the Planning Board Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York,LLC ("MetroPCS') (Site No.NY 7315) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane(a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic, New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75 —5 — 14.1 Dear Chairman Sidor and Members of the Planning Board: As discussed during the September 13, 2010 Planning Board Work Session for the above-referenced matter, please allow this correspondence to serve as MetroPCS' formal request for waiver of the "Base equipment shelter landscaping" otherwise required under Section 280-70N(4) of the Town Code, and pursuant to Section 28-76.2D of the Town Code. The reason for this waiver request is that there is limited visibility of the proposed base equipment from nearby properties and roadways. There are numerous buildings, structures and foliage on the premises that limit current visibility of the existing equipment and would likewise screen the proposed base equipment. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER& COUGHLIN, LLP By: �� Jo J. Coughlin JJC:cp Cc: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner(Via e-mail) MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �OF $oar P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR ��� yQ/_ Southold, NY 11971 Chair 41 411 OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G @ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND '�Q • �� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI lyC,QU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE September 14, 2010 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Set Hearing: Proposed Special Exception Consideration & Site Plan for Metro PCS @ Southold Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, September 13, 2010: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, October 18, 2010 at 6:10 p.m. for a public hearing at the Southold Town Hall regarding the special exception consideration and site plan, dated November 20, 2009, prepared by Luis Moglino R.A., for the above-referenced application. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Postina along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12.00 noon on Friday, October 15th. The sian and the post need to be returned to the Plannina Board Office after the public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very h�truly -yours, VeI \""` ""'4� )' 6.A Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encls. Southold Town Planninsa Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan & special exception consideration; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1 000-75-5-14.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-80 Zoning District; 4. That the application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2nd FI., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. The Planning Board Office will be closed on Monday, October 11th. 6. Information can also be obtained via the internet by sending an e-mail message to: Carol.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us; 7. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday. October 18. 2010 at 6:10 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: MetroPCS NY, LLC at the Southold Town Police Station Date: 9/15/10 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on 1 have sent notices, by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY. 12:00 noon, Fri., 10/15/10 Re: Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS NY. LLC at the Southold Town Police Station SCTM#s: 1000-75-5-14.1 Date of Public Hearing: Monday, October 18. 2010. 6:10 p.m. Town of Southold PC/Codebookfor Windows § 55-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L.No. 12-20031 Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application or petition is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. Notice relating to a public hearing on an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A. Town responsibility for publication of notice. The reviewing board or commission shall cause a notice giving the time, date,place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiated, proposed or requested by an applicant or petitioner, other than a Town board or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: (1) The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town,which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, giving notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than 10 feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant, petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested,posted at least seven days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall include description of the street location and area of the subject property, nature of relief or approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant, petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. 1 SEE s6G xa 069 ' 10)-v cYryf zsuJ MATCH -.�___ ---zz- -01:0 la.4M0 16.1 fi -� 2.25 L01 - Otv6NW6 S t �j6 16-0 f "MCI 1-06'01 b CNUTdN OF THE 10'0 ti d • OPEN COON M 8 9 ) f T.•`cl 01- - 16A51d 16.95(0 9 0-1Y- a LS] ' mt5 2.luU TOR- ) m M1�S! O +• )0 + ) )5 �,`. DOYfI- - ryb d a It M11! 3 5N 9 `Q 4 « 9 �'9 at •tw 10.6Mc) - 16.41 R. - yl ' fjy avMaesm mv:ry It m m C ry Yp f 199.4S 5. 1J. Yd 2 � � non s MPr� •f' �V �t � 1.6 oevMwaXF qP° fpm s6cn �J m e m LM z6u<) Alr - 21.1010 .1 MT. e LS •A - S 2951c) 11.1 .yS IS,C) nw/Y Sn/F/4U Al on81tlWF•F Nmrrsl ,hA 6.z 2e.o5 L65 nafTr v v.Tw 0 ,o q> 1.1 dayM/y.�„I.MIIL •> ~ 15.4, 3 J 6.l(A0 name s nrrzn 5.6 fi 5 ,M1 SCK DST.N0.5 23.0A )� otv6ufKNr xans. O naaa ar s«nut0 1> 7,5 ¢vflminxF xanv T 1.65 12 2 1 2_151A. 4 6.1 - TAX OF 11 2l.Utd � - `1 SOIITXOLO 166 �� m 3.2 FW 0u.w M1 15.3 2Am M) x6E xc.b 2.05 �! S ? 3.3. O S d L35 p G 11 '• , 2.95 Ory yryo 5 b2 & A 111 U S.LIU 9' 1.4010 at` y 111 12.1514 T06N OF SCUTHOLD Fal FOP.n.Nn 112 72 SEE SSEC.w, 4E YC.iu. FOR PQ•"C' 2.2° FOR PCLM 5.211c1 066-03-001 «s-m-0oi. FOR P m SEE06 YC W. ,ry l' SEE SEL M. 066-01-010.9 ,,ee SEE SEC.N0. m �- --�- LeE •t y086-06-026.1E �-�--- 006-01-OWI �- ZZ- -�- LINE MATCH -� L6ff• Q MATCH SEE SFC.N0.086 H.,., 11 N MATCH -� SEE SEC.M.006 E Xu« Lr w K N6N a SOUTHOLD sEtTion � 0., PP�NT65 nonce COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E w -- - ,- . w -- - T„6 ,P=,� Red Property Tax Service Agency r ff 7�J ]✓per W„ m m Ew -_„ °1iYW,ENNlF.4T@5TIX SALE UI E •..,..�„. N r 11961 "• ».omr LM - •- •«� N" xm xvP.„, L6T6W11N a 501 P00inx aF THE Lounir canix Nhwhea4 y E e.a.r.�a.. -�- sma.w�aosN.> (21) m.. r'�N.w rer-- "X ".. .„.n MfF«5 covert T. X5v 6 Pmenm va16 m Far. sawn� � o .m uc. :.... G -_-_-. vsw. '10-01 S qN, MAI 9C. ♦ice . Yp ♦ 1 � D3-a-00i.t 615-446:5 ... ` pFi-OL-0II -.. SEEYC MO. .• -...•. Y C � - 3p0-D3 ti�� ryH ya361 - L4 6 S; H10-09 9- 10.9 SL1PLcf 2RA(d yi TO OS tj• 0-IT0531 . .p.W E � � PNS' S2.Icl ♦. '�. \ O s urt.v: y\ A „ 4 19A O�pS Q „O 41 /Q. Q• a A, N 10.10 \ V y •� LOP4 Z.�2pd O 9J z 37.3hLtcOP 1 �1 A' s O nm a-anwu v ,V1 4K10'af/r.v//9 111 b ^N N <—N — +R y6N i1 •y0 4 411 11 9 s 15 4y 1 Hfi 3 \ )5 6AId S.SMCI ?2 ° >a 9 u of 1.9A _ %6 yN aR A?6 LO 1pw _ 1 t28lV�'”' 6 \ AS 41• 2AA 9S W •16 L]61� LW l0-T i 1.�� 416 1£0Y L40 1.1 •. ]�9� Y41N10 WI 5 �µJ tF<VC tYO IRR. 5 i \ t 9.A U \ 3 ♦ 3 ♦• 2SA1�1�4 to a LA \ / - Y10 • t4r[1 ti) oa9 tr TOWN a MKJn Spµc T �'tc1 14Arc1 k O N.RRIYER u.ry \ o' Y 6 14 5 c 61 LOATcI C t � \ T5µ" R4;y�o CREEK \ / 61 29 Lp 10.1 �V..SEE SEO t.ciLal `—.� 1.0.44 GNo. 065-03-0IL2 6S s 95 1T'2 Y]PW 11µJ © s L3 1.5 l.IN 1 61' m 1-4 F` n zs 262 I. LIAWI va..a' - II 3yk0 1Ukl - A1O0 6.5 i 0 20--1 2A TA! SLS 6 11 a.. 1L5•Ld • 6 a 19 21 ).R ).l 6.6 Jp b 26.1 1S 15 06co- 0.JAIc1 m 1yLc j6 L]I u. 5.1 a 11N0 to laN s wnw.o sT xcw 1� , 1• m i6DL`] � '�° 7 Dw-m-oo1nR 2;e 1�c �s'v j� 0 - 142 2 FOR VCL.W. ` IlE t y gs y,6•14; c� I.�Alcl 3af 22,1 SEE Y[.N0. I 'e�vCbb 0 098-01-0pL] LJ l.�• Q'Y L6A N' Fa rtL.W { q x wo ] Wi01 �- q ssc xn wla u[ j 6 � WTLN aF jam. %loo W SEE SEC.X0.090 • / \ Wi[N L a SFE SEC.IQ 090 as s U 0 L9A wra K vx s9c.n au _ E R#5 s M LLe WM Yv m a° !v wX ,tlW Dawk,D. —-Ad .pa.fW rk.wr MESS ,.. X. O,KR`Y. ALL NXI°F«TFS ^� - —�— ,.ewwr mNr czv 6 ,R --.-- 0.LO.. 6„R ],: NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K <,. 01 6 SWTHOLD SECTION NO LaR _ _ _ _ Red Property Tax Service Agency : «, E Na De.W. R .N�6r.N,LLe -. _ ialsyap«N11w —MT-- .6 „ �w MWENA I .µTERATG SALE OR N ,F_,SAL. "�`--. XW R_:tls� o 1 LL. --- L M wnkl Lw. Ly, :Mp 1 %TPRLTA)N C A,p,,,7W 6 11E ♦ 086 D 2) ^` Na.'a 12.1 ALW or I2.IA --- 56]W.C6Mrr r.e Wf rs PRpBTED �.� ,Nklp21 N) 11901 wee N. ,_L.. —_r—_ r..n.RmReIM—..—_ °fit 1610E . *i ..y.1}y�CT11f�C1LE N FEET: N as as 11,66 IYo61.1M 12.1 AICI .WL1La F.SiEI.iER ,RlglT,PoTTEN KTAAS$ R ilf �— ____— s.. WAL CImaERTr TAR SERXXE Amor. `so , P m, m 61RC1 N] LOOO PROPERTY NM cuxRsgx MTE: ,..1aLm J e.- AVRIFm M.x0. .. i. 6tl w Ln d6 2-M- '♦r IMCI SE6 5EL M. M1 Ipl WE pp. - n-oi as1 Me-oroo2 a 1-]OOi'C L1.Id A55 '�" • 122 103 J vum -46-01 J ♦' • ti ° dr LOAIU + • tiQrc +t Lam Ly'2 nwr aF s2moo yr -16L ♦ M1s,�� REV6ILPYCF.1p , , — N — IP01-01m •e •,• +6. p! p G 1 R2- y 'y'n, -04 �p1el 11 03 4c Ja �4F O d M1 M1 4ya •P. ,R' ,9'•Y. e 21.1 ^` .�' rmx slurxoLL I J� Iaouc, a 1 ftp) bllw ^yu M1 1p % 6> q 21.2 I d 6 41 d 1Y 14.0. o ♦. % d y TM.a SWT D d]' "WOQppO S♦p t pY n.] 191. / RVMrYT 4irart / 6 \ pEVFIMYFY/I1GYlL !! �'!� F \ Yv. ILM B I�anV SYIrM1p ' NIj�`: y♦♦ QVf16YMI KYl9 1 .SYO,,G yp. O F IN Z111d �• 1b♦ 9 FOR F0.Ma 6 SEE SEL.x0. F 10.1 , SLIMcI FOR E1.NQ rnxil SEE 5EC M0. _ 0e6-OS-Mll 39 L6. LO L.2 FM FIX:xO. q sd Fm PLL N0. SEE XL Ml 12] ,� SEE SE6 x0. OM-01-015 M PL.M1 69.6. MS +q SEE SEL.x0. -02-0M.2 --_ 7 �HQ a Lo 1cl - W-02-07 - UNE g --�— — SC/y 12.6 SEE SFC.moss Q B 3?19 MATCH LVE 22.M0U wrw la MATCH � \ �_�— yT y[C.MOK f'O?9`\ SEE 5EL x0.065 . 1 K MAW SDUTHDLD sccrioN No WYRF-K..1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E va6ss m1.• or:EmaL wA FRa60s NOTICE - a °F^" "°`"`T6i M,FAMCKSALEM Real Property Tax Service A envy ,,. wx,FxucE. N T 1190 y an KE Lamy Cenief Poverlie0d: N .els 074 xrbuxr oK,R&I,.M a.xr%M,M a,1E E doi.•ce..:a.. —'�— sea.we�Fw.su♦ 1211 ..n.. Z _•—- .n.marvn w —nl—- r ortR suFLu LpMrY,.2 WP s FRalanEo 5[AIE M FEF,: A 66ML,x0 ioau PROPERTY AIPP G l.ewm.el w ----- ••p•••w ' _�- La:a«t.i.. --L-- rwu pn.x.w—_L—_ vm u1°EPF VT u "ITEx FEw a T' ♦ a P as E -vim Yi4 Ol�exn a (wnry LF• -I—_ x•wl.WM1CI LN—IY—- WILYL2 IIfM PRa4RTY TAX SERVICE MSNCY. pHl[R9M OML FV.OI.IKI Slru I yve er ye M IYwkl lw Ma — s p wan Cueww w 12.1 Mcf av u+ 5••r FYmn Ir WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, September 13, 2010 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda 4:15 p.m. Site Plans & Subdivisions ----------------- Project name Metro PCS, located at the SCTM#. ( 1000-75 5 14.1 Southold Town Police Station -- Location 165 Peconic Lane Peconic ...__.._-. . .. .-.-.-.- ... ---------- .---- -----. .--- Description: This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic La... ---------------.- Status: Site Plan and Special Exception Consideration _-._ ..... ---- — ------ ---- Action: Review application and recommend for the Planning Board to accept the j application for review and refer the application to involved interested agencies...._ -- ----- ...... ._. ...-. -.-. -- Attachments 1 Staff Report ......... ----------__ ..... .. . _ ------ - -- '-- ------------ Project name: T Metro PCS, located at Penny SCTM#: 1000-141-3-38.1 Lumber .....-- ......................I--,--.----,-----"---------............ -------� ---- -- Locati ............ ........ ....... --._._ .........- Description This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna at a height of 75 feet to the outside j of an existing 1 00' flag pole and install related equipment on the ground at the premises located on a 3.8 acre parcel 400 feet east of Lipco Road in the LI Zoning District. Status: Site Plan and Special Exception Consideration -- ..-. -- --- Action: Review application and recommend for the Planning Board to accept the application for review and refer the application to involved interested -a- _e.ncies. ------------------------- ------ - -- Attachments. Staff Report --- r ---- Project name Old Barge Restaurant, 2"a Floor I_SCTM#: 11000-56-6-8.7 Location. j the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold ......... - - - -. -..---- --- -------- Description. This amended site plan is for a new second floor addition of 1,397 sq. ft. I and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the Mil Zone .-. .... __ ...._. .- Status: Approved Site Plan _ ..... .. .. ...- '- — - --- - Action Applicant requests Planning Board to re issue site plan approval This approval expired on 3/14/08 .....- _.- ----------- - Attachments Letter from Applicant _ ___ ----------------------- ------- -- _� RE,NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ` ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEW YORE AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORE 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OF GOUHSBL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN September 10,2010 _ BY HAND Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board ,9010 Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (MetroPCS) (Site No.NY 7315) Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Construction of a Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic,New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75—5— 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: As you are aware, we are the attorneys for MetroPCS New York, LLC (`MetroPCS') with respect to the captioned matter. We are in receipt of the July 1, 2010 correspondence of Richard A. Comi with regard to this matter(copy attached hereto). This correspondence shall serve as MetroPCS' response to same. Mr. Comi's reference to our application submission with cover letter dated April 22, 2010 is incorrect. The Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Applications for this proposal were submitted with your office on February 25, 2010 (copy of stamped filing correspondence attached hereto). 1. The following checks have been filed in connection with this proposal: • MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4151 in the amount of$50.00, which sum represents the Building Permit Application fee for denial; • MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4152 in the amount of$500.00, which sum represents the Building Permit Application fee for a modification, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(1)(a); • MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4702 in the amount of $1,000.00, which sum represents the Site Plan Application fee for a modification, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(2)(a); and • MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4703 in the sum of$1,000.00, which sum represents the Special Exception Application fee, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(3). Town of Southold Planning Board • MetroPCS at Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic Site Plan/Special Exception Applications September 10, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Enclosed herewith is a copy of MetroPCS' $500.00 check and our stamped Building Department filing correspondence. 2. Mr. Comi asserts that the written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance is not satisfactory because (i) the KMC report does not include the top two existing carriers on the tower; (ii) the geotechnical report referenced in the Tower Reinforcement Drawing & Specifications was not submitted; and (iii) the Tower Reinforcement Drawing & Specifications do not contain foundation calculations. There is nothing in the Southold Town Code that states that a zoning application is incomplete if a geotechnical report is not submitted or if foundation calculations do not accompany the structural drawings filed with the zoning application. More importantly, page 4 of the KMC Report does in fact include all existing antennas located on the tower. However, we have enclosed herewith the following documents: • Seven (7) sets of updated Structural Analysis Report, prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated August 25, 2010, which more clearly labels the existing antennas located on the tower as listed in the designed appurtenance loading table; • Seven (7) sets of updated Tower Reinforcement Drawings & Specifications, prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated August 25, 2010; and • Seven (7) sets of the Geotechnical Report, prepared by Soil Mechanics Drilling Corp., dated January 25, 2010, for your reference. We will submit copies of the foregoing items with the Building Department as well. Please note that we believe that a more prudent approach would be to file such structural documentation with the Building Department after zoning approval inasmuch as the design and/or location of the proposed site may be changed pursuant to recommendations made by the approving board or conditions attached to such approval. MetroPCS recognizes that the proposed facility must be designed to meet all requirements set forth in the New York State Building Code and will do so. The time for such review should be prior to issuance of the Building Permit and these drawings and calculations should be reviewed by the Building Department of the Town of Southold, which is well qualified to perform a review at that time. Accordingly, with regard to any additional structural documentation requested by Mr. Comi, we request, on behalf of MetroPCS, that these items be provided to the Building Department, following Planning Board approval of the facility. 3. With respect to the propagation maps, Mr. Comi questions the reason for filing Map 3 (-75dBm). We respectfully direct his attention to Southold Town Code Section 280-74B(1)(d) which requires the filing of propagation maps that include a minimum three signal strength depictions (-75dBm, -85dBm, and -95dBm). With respect to Mr. Comi's question as to why no other proposed sites are shown on the propagation maps for this site, Code Section 280-74B(1)(d) requires that the applicant submit "propagation maps for existing coverage from existing surrounding and/or approved sites, coverage from all alternative sites considered and coverage from the proposed site." MetroPCS does not have any existing and/or approved sites in the surrounding area. 4. Mr. Comi questions the frequency bands utilized by MetroPCS. The FCC License submitted clearly indicates that MetroPCS is licensed to operate the following radio service: "AW-AWS, 1710-1755 / 2110 — 2155 MHz bands." The FCC compliance report only refers to the frequency band (2130 - 2140 MHz) in which RF signals are emitted (transmitted) by the proposed base station. The 1710 MHz band is used for reception by the base station, and is not part of the FCC compliance analysis Town of Southold Planning*d • MetroPCS at Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic Site Plan/Special Exception Applications September 10, 2010 Page 3 of 3 because no RF emissions in the 1710 MHz band are involved at the site. With respect to Mr. Comi's inquiry as to the existing carriers, all requisite documents submitted with the instant application show the four existing carriers located on the subject tower. However, Nextel maintains whip antennas on the tower and not an array of panel antennas, as is the case with the other three carriers at the facility. We submit herewith nine (9) sets of Revised Zoning Drawings prepared by MTM Design Group, dated September 2, 2010, which include revised Elevation Drawings (page A-2) that more clearly label the existing Nextel whip antennas on the tower. 5. With regard to Mr. Comi's inquiry as to landscaping, inasmuch as the recently amended Code now requires the landscaping of all base equipment (and not only base equipment shelters as was cited in the previous version of the Code), MetroPCS has amended its proposal to incorporate landscaping of the proposed equipment so as to comply with the amended Code. As noted above, we submit, herewith, revised Zoning Drawings (dated September 2, 2010), which now also depict the proposed screen of evergreen trees around the proposed equipment. 6. (Comm Item 8). The Vicinity Plan, included as page A-8 of the Construction Drawings, is not dated May 8, 2009, but rather contains a revision date of November 20, 2009. In any event, the revised Zoning Drawings enclosed herewith (dated September 2, 2010), include an updated plan and list of property owners, updated by MTM Design Group, Inc. on July 12, 2010. 7. (Comi Item 9). MetroPCS will conform with directives of the Town Building Department as it relates to the tower's structural integrity and conformity with any State Code requirements. MetroPCS recognizes that the proposed facility must be designed to meet all requirements set forth in the New York State Building Code and will do so. However, the time for such review should be prior to issuance of the Building Permit and said documentation should be reviewed by the Building Department of the Town of Southold,which is well qualified to perform a review at that time. 8. (Comi Item 10). With respect to grading and drainage, please see the letter of MTM Design Group, Inc., dated June 23, 2010, submitted with your office on June 28, 2010. With respect to proposed landscaping plan,please see our comments in item 5 above. Notwithstanding comments to the contrary, the application is complete, and we respectfully request that the Public Hearing be scheduled immediately consistent with Federal and State law. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing,please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies,we remain Very truly yours, RE,NIELSEM-- & COUGHLIN, LLP By: � 2 � �awrence C. Re LCR:mk Encls. cc: Richard Comi, Center for Municipal Solutions(via email) • CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS • 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD 518-439-3079 GLENMONT,NEW YORK 12077 FAX:518-078-0909 July 1, 2010 (via email and regular mail) Mr. Lary Re, Esq. Re,Nielsen, Huber&Coughlin,LLP 26 North New York Avenue Huntington,New York 11743 T,j Re: Southold NY Metro PCS 165 Peconic Lane Peconic("MetroPCS or the"Applicant") Dear Mr. Re; We have reviewed the above referenced application received with cover letter dated April 22,2010. For reasons we set forth below,we find that the application is incomplete in accordance the Wireless Facilities Statute for the Town of Southold ("Wireless Facility Statute"). 1) According to Section 280-74 this application requires a fee of$2500 comprising of a$500 Building Application modification fee; a Site Plan Application fee of$1000 and a Special Exception Application fee of$1000. Your letter dated April 22,2010 indicates that the Applicant enclosed the fees in connection with the Site Plan Application and Special Exception Application,however,please provide evidence that the fee of$500 was paid in connection with the Building Application. 2) §280-74(B)(1)(b)requires written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance with applicable laws. To this end,the applicant provided a report prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., documenting the proposed facility's structural compliance with applicable law as well as a Tower Reinforcement Drawings&Specifications(collectively referred to as"KMC's Report"). KMC's Report is not a structural verification because it is insufficient for the following reasons: i)the designed of appurtenance loading(on page 4 and load case no.I of the KMC Report)does not include the top two existing carriers on the tower; ii)the Tower Reinforcement Drawing& Specification provides that there was a geotechnical report by Soil Mechanics Drilling Corp.,dated January 25, 2010, however,such report is not included in the application materials; and iii)the Tower Reinforcement Drawing& Specification does not contain calculations of the foundation or the capacity of the new foundation. Moreover, all of the calculations are incorrect because the load of the tower is incorrect. A complete and accurate report must be provided. 3) The propagation maps provided are incomplete as follows: Mr. Balzano, in his affidavit dated October 29, 2009,provided signal strengths that he claims are required by MetroPCS for in-building commercial, in-building residential and in-vehicle reliable service. Although we agree with his signal in connection with the In-Vehicle Coverage and In- Building Residential coverage we do not agree with that a signal level of-75dBm is necessary to provide reliable In-Building Commercial coverage. We believe a signal level of-85dBM is sufficient for both residential and commercial In-Building coverage. If MetroPCS believes that they require stronger signal level they need to provide detailed proof as to why such signal strength is required. The area of coverage surrounding the proposed site is comprised of buildings three stories high or less whereby we believe that-85dBm will provide reliable in building coverage(With-95dBm providing reliable in-vehicle coverage). Therefore we do not understand the reason for map 3,in-building commercial. In addition,we do not see is what ERP was imput into the propagation model. (See attached Proyaagation Study Requirements and Prop a at . g tion Data Study shee We require new propagation maps utilizing the ERP as calculated on the Propagation data sheet done at-85dBm and-95dBm. We are aware that MetroPCS is proposing additional sites in Southold. Why are no other sites shown on the propagation maps? 4) Section 280-74(C)provides no new antenna support structures may be constructed without a carrier licensed by the FCC as a provider. The Applicant's FCC license indicates that the Applicant has radio service AW–AWS, 1710– 1755/2110-2155 MHz bands. However,the Pinnacle Telecom Group Antenna FCC FR Compliance Assessment and Report for MetroPCS dated October 14, 2009 provides that the Applicant is going to be operating with the frequency band of 2130–2140 MHz. There is a clear contradiction here. Is the Applicant going to be operating in 1710 -1755 MHz bands as authorized under the license or only in the 2110–2155 MHz Band?The correct and consistent documents must be provided. In addition page 6-7 as well as page 11 of the pinnacle report discusses 4 existing carriers (Nextel,AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon),however,other documents only shows 3 existing carriers. Which is correct? This impacts RF emissions.Incorrect documents need to be revised. 5) Section 280–70(M)(d)--Metro PCS has not commented on improving the landscaping at the site. What landscaping improvement does the Applicant propose? The visual impact of the shelter and accessory equipment at the bottom of the tower should be reduced by appropriate landscaping measures. 8) §280-74(C)(4)-Vicinity Plan—the print A-8 titled 500' Radius Property Owners List provides the property owners as of May 8,2009. Such list is outdated as the list was compiled over a year ago. In your next submission please provide an updated list. 9) It is our understanding that the lattice tower is over five(5)years old and to insure that the structure is safe,thus protecting the health, safety and welfare of Southold's citizens as is required in the purpose of the code(section 280-67), an inspection per ANSI 222-F is required. In your next submission you can include the inspection report,or we can accept an acknowledgement that the inspection will be conducted after the issuance of the Special Use Permit, if granted,prior to the issuance of a building permit and start of construction and that any discrepancies found during the inspection will be corrected prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. 10)Pursuant to §280-133 and the Site Plan Application Checklist the following items are missing and/or incomplete for the application: • Grading and drainage plan with calculations; and • Proposed landscape plan; Until you provide the required information as noted above,we are unable to make our recommendation to the Town that the application is complete. We strongly recommend a conference call with you to go over the comments in this letter, specifically to review what we believe is necessary to complete the application. We invite you to include the individuals that are preparing the technical information propagation maps, data sheet,tower drawings and calculations to be included in the call.This will help insure the completeness of your next submittal. Please contact Denise Benun at 212 921-5527 to establish the date and time for the call. Sincerely, R .A. COmi (electronic signature) Richard A. Comi CMS cc: Town Planning Board(via email and regular mail) Denise Benun(via email) Heather Lanza(via email) 0 0 ' Prolm ag tion Studv Requirements Propagation studies are required with the application to prove the need for any new tower site,or co-location on any existing structure where there is an increase in the height of the structure or any modification where there is an increase in the height of the antenna(s)on the structure. . (If service at the site is proposed for the cellular frequency band(800—900 MHz),even if the site will also utilize other frequencies,the studies need to be done at the cellular frequency band.) For a new tower or where there would be an increase the height of the existing tower or other structure,two propagation studies are required;one are the proposed height and another set of studies at 10' lower, unless something different is otherwise agreed to at the pre-application meeting.(Along with the lower propagation study should be a narrative that describes why the lower height is not sufficient)If the application is for co-locating on an existing tower or other structure without increasing the height of the existing tower or structure, then propagation studies are only required at the height proposed by the applicant. Legend: Propagation studies are to include a legend on each sheet showing the following at a minimum: 1)a scale of miles or distance of no smaller than 1"to 1/2 mile;and 2)color coded of signal strength designations at-10ldBm for"on-street"service,-95 bBm for"in-vehicle"service and-85 dBm for"in-building"service(except in urban areas where it can be demonstrated that there are several four story or larger buildings in the proposed coverage area). It is preferable that Propagation studies be provided on clear acetate sheets so that they may be overlaid and more easily read individually or in conjunction with each other,as may be necessary for proper analysis. A base map of the community on which to overlay the propagation study is needed that must show and identify the major roads in the intended service area. For any proposed site located less than 2 miles from a community's boundary,the boundary must be shown on the map. The base map must be the same scale as the overlay propagation maps. Note: Only signal strengths of-10ldBm for"on-street"service,—95 dBm;ror In-Vehicle service and—85 dBm for In-Building service will be considered in the context of the need for the facility and the need for the requested height,unless the facility is intended to serve an urban market.This is based on the accepted losses inherent with each situation and the ability of the hand unit to function nominally at—106 dBm. Note: The Applicant must state whether the proposed acili desi n isL in-vehicle coverage(95 dBm)or in- building coverage(-85dBm). If an applicant believes it needs different signal strength levels,such must be justified in sufficient detail to allow verification of the technological need,such as a statement or explanation by the phone manufacturer or the carrier that greater signal strengths are needed and why lesser signal strengths will not permit the handset to function as designed or certain services to be provided in a functional context.Note that the local regulatory body is not reguired to grant an applicant's "best case"or most desired situation but rather what will enable the handset to function as designed and the service to be reliable. Note: Propagation studies must be accompanied by all modeling information used to produce them(using the provided"Data Sheet for Propagation Study"form),including,but not limited to the ERP(Effective Radiated Power)from the site/facility that is the subject of the application and all adjacent sir&Vfacilities and the cut sheets from all equipment showing the operating characteristics, such as,for purposes of example: ❑ The power of the radios stated in watts ❑ The gains and losses from each component of all equipment The Center unici al Solutions Propagation Study Data Sheet for Proposed Facility Applicant: Name/title person completing form: Proposed Site Name: Site Address: Instructions:Complete this form,attach radio and antenna spec sheets and include with the RF Propagation Study. All nearby sites(adja providing coverage in and near the proposed site are to be included in the study. Use an additional form if more than 3 sites Line No. ITEM UNIT Proposed site Adjacent site#1 Adjacent site#2 Adjacent site A Data Data Data GENERAL INFO: #1 Site Name #2 Site Address #3 Tower or structure height feet #4 Antenna mounting height agl feet #5 Network Technology #6 Operating Frequency MgHz #7 Base Station Manufacturer #8 Base Station Model# #9 Radio Max Power Watts #10 Is pilot channel used for propagation(yes or no) #11 If yes,pilot channel power Watts (min.20%of r) #12 Convert Power to dBm dBm #13 Losses: #14 Is there a combiner #15 If yes make and model #16 If yes,combiner loss dB #17 Cable losses: #18 Cable diameter In. #19 Cable Igth. From antenna to Ft equipment #20 Cable loss per 100 ft. dB #21 Calculated loss dB #22 Connectors #23 Number of connectors #24 Loss per connector dB #25 Calculated Loss dB #26 Jumpers: #27 Number of jumpers #28 Loss per jumper dB #29 Calculated loss dB #30 Total calculated loss: dB #31 Gains: #32 Is there an in line amplifier #33 If yes,gain dB #34 Antenna Mfg. #35 Antenna Model# #36 Antenna gain dB #37 Total gain: dB #38 Result: #39 Transmission Power dBm #40 ERP Wafts To Calculate ERP(Line#40)of an Antenna: Step#1: Insert the radIrpower in Watts in line 9 and pilot power, if apph le in Line 11. Step#2: Convert the radio power or pilot power,as applicable, into dBm units. Insert the result into Line #12 Step#3:Add all dB losses: Line#16+Line#21+Line#25+ Line#29; Insert the result into Line#30 Step#4:Add all dB gains: Line#33+Line#36; Insert the result into Line#37 Step$5:Add Line#37 to Line#12. Subtract from the result,Line#30. Insert the result into Line#39. Step#6: Convert the number in Line#39 into Watts. Record the result in Line#40. a P RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH Naw YORH AvENUE HUNTINGTON, Naw YORE 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OF GOIIN68L WILLIAN J. NIELSEN February 25, 2010 BY HAND V ' Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner FEB 2 5 2010 1.`: Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 1 54375 Main Road _ Southold, NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic,New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75 — 5 — 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: On behalf of MetroPCS New York, LLC ('MetroPCS' hereafter), submitted herewith are the captioned Applications as follows: With respect to the Site Plan Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application; 2. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Affidavit; 3. Original and one(1) copy of Applicant's Transactional Disclosure Form; 4. Original and one (1) copy of Environmental Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated November 20, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(3); 5. Original and one (1) copy of LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting; 6. MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4702 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the fee for modification,pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(2)(a); 7. Seven (7) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report, prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group, dated January 6, 2010, demonstrating the project's compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations and providing information on the other carriers already located on the facility in accordance with Town 0 0 Town of Southold Planning Board T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Applications February 25,2010 Page 2 of 3 Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(6), 280-74B(1)(a) and 280-70J; (Please note that said reports have been revised from those filed with the Building Permit Application for Denial, which were dated July 2, 2009. The enclosed 1/6/10 reports should be referenced and used going forward as they include the total cumulative emissions of all existing, approved and proposed carriers located at the facility); 8. Seven (7) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated December 14, 2009, in accordance with Town Code Sections 280- 74C(1), 280-74C(6), and 280-74B(1)(b); (Please note that said reports have been revised from those filed with the Building Permit Application for Denial, which were dated July 8, 2009. The enclosed 12/14/09 reports should be referenced and used going forward as they include the total structural calculations of all existing, approved and proposed equipment located on the tower. The revised Structural Analysis states the need for foundation reinforcement, and related structural drawings are submitted herewith as item 9); 9. Seven (7) counterparts of Tower Reinforcement Drawings & Specifications, prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated January 29, 2010, in accordance with Structural Analysis Report referenced above; 10. Seven (7) copies of MetroPCS's FCC License pursuant to Town Code Sections 280- 74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(c). 11. Seven (7) counterparts of FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, dated August 26, 2009,pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(2); 12. Two (2) counterparts of Visual Analysis, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated November 17, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(3); 13. Nine (9) sets of Zoning Drawings, including Site Plan, Vicinity Plan and Elevation Drawings, prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc., dated November 20, 2009, addressing Town Code Sections 280-74C(4), 280-74C(5), 280-74C(9), 280-74C(10), 280-74C(11), 280-74C(12), 280-74C(13) and 280-133A(4); 14. One (1) CD Rom containing digital files of propagation and search ring maps,pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(7) and §280-74B(1)(f); 15. Two (2) sets of Photos of Existing Structures pursuant to Town Code Section 280- 74C(8); and 16. Four (4) copies of Property Survey, prepared by John Gallacher, Land Surveyor, dated October 30, 2003,pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(5). We also submit seven (7) counterparts of the following items, which are now required under Code Section 280-74B, Building Permit Application requirements, but were not required or submitted at the time the Building Permit Application was submitted for the instant proposal: 1. Gap and Propagation Maps, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74B(1)(d) and (e); 2. Search Ring Map,pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(e); 3. Affidavit of Radiofrequency Engineer,pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(e); 4. Copy of Deed, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(g); and 5. Copy of Communications Site Lease Agreement, between MetroPCS and Town of Southold, dated July 9,2009,pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(g). Town of Southold Planning Board �t T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Applications February 25, 2010 Page 3 of 3 With regard to the Special Exception Permit Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Wireless Facility Special Exception Application; 2. MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4703 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the Special Exception Application fee, pursuant to Town Code Section 280- 74A(3); 3. Two (2) copies of Building Department Notice of Disapproval, dated September 29, 2009, and Building Permit Application,pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(1)(a); 4. Two (2) copies of Site Plan Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(1)(b); 5. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Jeffrey Homire addressing Alternative Sites Considered and Good Faith Effort to colocate on existing towers, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-741)(1)(c), 280-74D(2), and 280-74D(4); and 6. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Anthony Cillo regarding future co-location, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(2). Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RE, NIEL EN, HUBER& COUGHLIN, LLP By: Bailey C. Lkkifi BCL/mk Enclosures RE, N ELSEN,HUBER & COUGHLC E ATTORNEYS AT LAW D 36 NORTH NEW Yoax AVENUE SEP - 1 2009 HUNTINOTOx, NEW YORK 11743 DEPI September 1,2009 TaLEraoxa: (631) 425-4100 TOWNLOF SOUTHOLD FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 of COUNSEL BY HAND WILLT J. NxaLSEN Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York,LLC Building Permit Application(for Denial) Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: Town of Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic,New York SCTM#: 1000-75-5-14.1 Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS"), submitted herewith is the captioned Application as follows: 1. Town of Southold Building Permit Application; 2. Building Permit Application fee for denial: MetroPCS Check No.415;in the amount of$50.00; 3. Building Permit Application fee: MetroPCS Check No. 4152,in the amount of$500.00, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(1)(b); 4. Four (4) sets of Construction Drawings with Site Plans and Elevations, prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc. and dated August 31, 2009; 5. Property survey; 6. Two (2) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group and dated July 2, 2009, demonstrating the project's compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations in accordance with Town Code Sections 280-74B(1)(a)and 280-71H; 7. Two (2) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. and dated July 8, 2009, documenting the facility's structural compliance with local, state and federal codes in accordance with Town Code Section 280-74B(1)(b); and, 8. Copy of MetroPCS' FCC License and FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navagation, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74B(1)(c). Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing,please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies,we remain Very truly yours, RE, NEELSEN,HUBER& COUGHLIN, LLP By: Bailey . Larkin BL Enclosures 4152 92-1/1110 T% METROPCS NEW YORK, LLC U 5 SKYLINE DRIVE 7/2/2009 HAWTHORNE, NY 10532 8 PAY TO THE Town of Southold $ **500.00 ORDER OF Five Hundred and OOI100*f111f1f„11f,f„f11f11f11f,,,1ff»,,,f*,f*1f11ff,f,,,,1f11*,.1f11*,„1ff.f,f„*„f11f,1„f*,.f.„,. 8 DOLLARS Town of Southold LL MEMO BP App. Fee- NY7315 Al RORiiEGsicnATURe 5'4452 IP is I1i0000421: 442 639 434411'cmd. I ewl a Anl1r1*�NA "`""""en 4151 METROPCS NEW YORK, LLC 110 o 5 SKYLINE DRIVE 7/2/2009 HAWTHORNE,NY 10532 5 ORDER OFE Town of Southold I $ *'50.00 Fifty and 00/100*11****"*ff**Nlffff Yf*,fNM flf„YM,f1*fflflf*f,,,*fflfNllf,f„fM1iff111ffkf,1f111ff14,*ffff11fN1fflf,*fH a DOLLARS Town of Southold 5 a MEMO BP Denial Fee-NY7315 -------”' , A IZED SIGNATURE I 5'4154 5' 1: 1140000421: 442 639 434 i5' TOWER REINFORCEMENT DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS T-1 TITLE ST-1 FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT ELEVATION ST-2 HELICAL DETAILS ST-3 ANODE INSTALLATION ST-3.1 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ST-3.2 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ST-3.3 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT, SITE LOCATION: 41815 MAIN ROAD - PECONIC, NY. 11958 SCOPE: THE PURPOSE OF THESE REINFORCING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS IS TO REINFORCE THE FOUNDATION. THE FOUNDATION IS BEING REINFORCED WITH HELICALS ON ALL THREE LEGS. REINFORCING INCLUDES: THE FOUNDATION IS BEING REINFORCED WITH HELICALS ON ALL THREE LEGS, THERE WILL BE 2 HELICALS PER LEG FOR A TOTAL OF 6. THIS ANALYSIS RCEM��TER ANALYZING THE TOWER. REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS DATED UGUST 25TH, 201 AND GEOTECHNICAL BY SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING ' CORP. DATED JAN , , NO. 10-040, �n q OWNER: ' KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT: MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS: n� NF .� ®.. .em-w�aw�as�;.se�*w«q—ar IAY C uw..wo.F-n Ro.e E,ww.ru Deme 8 '187 .�" , `• PE`1.B PhdM: (!OB)5360100 Fa (COY)1168l.58 Cl."i's:i'u rwccmU w-m, 2. 08/25/I0 Q' ,9 APPROVALS ! DATE: PROJECT NAME: I. 08/03/Y OWNER DATE NO. DA'E 5OUTWOLD DRAWING No. PROJECT ADDRESS: T R/ F., DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD T�1 CD145T.: DATE: PECONIC, NY. IIg58 ¢E9HiON*' lo. PROJECT c: SITE ID n DRAWING TITLE: PC. C11KD DR N DATE: Og0507 TITLE SWEET ML13 J5R 01/2q/10 NOTE: 4. CONTRACTOR TO BACK FILL HOLES AND RESTORE I. HELICAL TO BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY OR WITH COMPOUND TO EXISTING CONDITION. CONTRACTOR A V BATTER AWAY FROM EXISTING CONCRETE TO ADD DIRT AND SEED IT AS REQUIRED. BLOCK. ALSO BATTER HELICAL AWAY FROM EACH OTHER. 5. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE SHOWN HELICAL 2. HELICAL PILES ARE TO BE A MIN. OF 45' OR A ATTACHMENT TO FOUNDATION OR SUBMIT EQUAL. MAX. TORQUE OF 10400 FOOT POUNDS. 6. FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT BASED ON 36' MIN. NILTI EPDXY BOLTS HIT/HY 150/NIT ICE GEOTECHNICAL. REPORT BY SOIL MECHANICS 3. ( DRILLING CORP. JOB NUMBER 10-040 DATED 25TH ADHESIVE ANCHOR) WITH 6V EMBEDMENT. (MIN. JANUARY, 2010, AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BY OF 16 PER PLATE). INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURE KM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. DATED 14TH INSTRUCTION. DECEMBER, 2009. EXISTING TOWER LEG ITYP.1 17'-0' EXISTING c GRADE ' SACRIFICIAL PROPOSED ANODE • • I •I HELICAL PILES (2 4f PER LEG TYP.I I • � i I .� I 2.00' SQUARE BAR 1 I •' I WITH 14', 14", 12", la m I:°� : 1011, 8" HELICES WITH A 1'BATTER f : • I r . . 1 —3'0 CAISSON I :?•v...� 1 FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT ELEV. 5T-1 SCALE: NTS owNER: Consulting Engineers, Inc. cuEN�MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. RevlsloNs. N� KMMW4-Ax��EnN:�IQ�MR�M � fA 11O11H®B811fff [n�ff 11 tN� 9lLM118111E ttl L 32VM Uppr FMry ROW E.MWOOM L^i)ti T' ne (>yUa Phone: (BO,),33M00 F= (M)596EB5B i1:u�+'ilai FIR I1lR1W-tlM 2. OB/ZS/10 _ APPROVALS 6 DATE: PROJECT NAME: I. 08/03/10 OWNER: DATE,_ 5OUTHOLD oaAwING No.. S.A.C.: DATE: PROJECT ADDRE55. A DATE, 41815 MAIN ROAD u CONST.: DATE: PECONIC, NY. 11958 PROJEC— #. SITE ID tt DRAWING TITLE P C C44KD. DRN DATE 090507 FOUND. REINFORCEMENT ELEV MLB JSR 01/29/10 GRIND AND/OR LEVEL 4'AAT AREA WITH 123 PLUS UAL MINIMUM 15' 14ILT1 21-0' EPDXY BOLTS (MIN. 16 PER PLATE) PROPOSED 2 1/2x2 1/2x1/7 PLATE FOR HELICAL PILE MOUNTING EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK 3' SQUARE x MINIMUM 15' HIL3' DEET' EPDXY BOLTS IMIN. 16 PER PLATE) )% 4-*rCC 4 WELDS TYP. HELICAL PILE HITM -PROPOSED HELICAP EXPLORITORITY 102.6 KIP TENSION PILES 16 TYPI EXCAVATION TRENCH CAPACITY (ULTIMATE), 104.9 KIP IN COMPRESSION, t HELICAL MOUNTING DETAIL PLAN) TORQUE IS 10400 ST-2 SCALE: 3/4"'1'-011 MINIMUM %' HILTI SHAFT EXTENSION EPDXY BOLTS (MIN. 16 NOTE: PER PLATeI 2'-6' INSTALLATION SHALL BE OBSERVED BY QUALIFIED LICENSED ENGINEER FAMILIAR 3' 6' S' 6' 3' WITH HELICAL PILE INSTALLATION AND PHOTOGRAPHY/WRITTEN RECORD i SUBMITTED TO MTM DESIGN GROUP. T cn 4„6C 4 WELDS TYP. O • • • ESTIMATED DEPTH BASE ON ASSUMED Z) PROPOSED 2 1/2x2 1/2x)5' GEOTECHNICAL DATA PLATE FOR HELICAL PILE • • • • MOUNTING o � T T 11-11-12-10-6 BATTER 7 BATTER 7 COUNTER LEAD CLOCKWISE CLOCKWISE PROPOSED HELICAP PILES USE 2' SQUARE BAR FOR EASIER WELDING TO PLATE 16 TYPJ CONTRACTOR TO PAINT PLATE AND WELD AREA OF HELICAL WITH 2 PART EPDXYIPAINT,AND AFTER DRYING, COAT WITH BITUMINOUS ROOF REPAIR COATING. z HELICAL MOUNTING DETAIL (ELEV.) 3 HELICAL DETAIL ST-2 SCALE: 3/411•11-011 ST-2 SCALE: 3/8"61'-01, J owNE ( Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT' MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS: . `�L IN �' � � '.lei. :�t�°� m UPP a"baa F�W°66046 O ")5368666 Flxvw W-mt 2. 06/25/10 APPROVALS 6 DATE: PROJECT NAME: I. 06/03/10 DA-E OWNER: DATE: NO. SOUTHOLD DRAWING NO.: S.A.C.: DATE: PROJECT ADDRESS. DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD ST-2 U BON CONST.: DATE: PECONIC, NY. 110158 9 FPROJEC- tt SITE ID tt DRAWING TITLE CHKD. DRN DATE 0010507 HELICAL DETAILS MLH JSR 01/29/10 ANODE INSTALLATION WITH CADWELD CONNECTIONS TO HELICAL ANCHORS GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK THIS WORK CONSISTS OF FURNISHING ALL LABOR, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREPARATION AND INSTALLATION OF A CORROSION PROTECTION ANODE USING A CADWELD CONNECTION TO A STEEL FOUNDATION SUPPORT PRODUCT ACCORDING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN.THE WORK INCLUDES,BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO,THE FOLLOWING: 1. INSTALLING THE ANODE; 2. PREPARING THE AREA OF ELECTRICAL ATTACHMENT; 3. INSTALLING THE WIRE, SLEEVE, DISK, WELD METAL AND STARTING MATERIAL TO THE CADWELD MOLD; 4. WELDING THE ANODE WIRE TO THE PRODUCT REQUIRING CATHODIC PROTECTION; 5. CLEANUP DELIVERY,STORAGE AND HANDLING ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE HANDLED AND TRANSPORTED CAREFULLY TO PREVENT ANY DEFORMATION OR DAMAGE. THE MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED IN A COOL AND DRY LOCATION. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT THE ACCUMULATION OF DIRT OR FOREIGN MATTER ON THE MATERIALS. SUCH ACCUMULATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED PRIOR TO ANODE INSTALLATION AND CADWELDING. MATERIALS MAGNESIUM ANODE THE MAGNESIUM ANODE SHALL BE CAST OF ALLOY AZ63 TO PRODUCE AN OPEN CIRCUIT POTENTIAL OF 1.53 TO 1.55 VOLTS. THE ANODE SHALL BE CENTERED IN A COTTON BAG AND SURROUNDED WITH A MIXTURE OF 75% HYDRATED GYPSUM, 20%BENTONITE AND 5% SODIUM SULFATE.THE LEAD WIRE SHALL BE SILVER SOLDERED TO THE CORE OF THE ANODE AND THEN FULLY SEALED AND INSULATED. THE LEAD WIRE SHALL BE A 10-FOOT LENGTH OF #12 TW INSULATED SOLID COPPER. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL SPECIFY ANODE WEIGHT FOLLOWING SOIL RESISTIVITY TESTING. CADWELD MOLD CADWELD MOLD IS USED TO ACCOMPLISH A PERMANENT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE ANODE AND THE FOUNDATION SUPPORT PRODUCT BEING PROTECTED FROM CORROSION (CATHODE). A SEMI- PERMANENT GRAPHITE MOLD SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL THE DIRECTION AND SPEED OF THE MOLTEN CADWELD METAL, AND THE FINAL SHAPE OF THE SOLIDIFIED WELD. MOLD CONFIGURATION IS RELATED TO THE SURFACE TO RECEIVE CADWELD AND TO CONDUCTOR SIZE. THE FOLLOWING MOLDS ARE DESIGNED TO ACCEPT FROM#14 TO#10 SOLID WIRE,#8 SOLID OR STRANDED WIRE,OR#6 SOLID WIRE. 3/4" TO 3-1/2" DIAMETER PIPES USE CAVST-IGA CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCORPORATED,OR EQUAL. 4" TO 10" DIAMETER PIPES USE CAVST-IGB CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCORPORATED,OR EQUAL. 12" & LARGER DIAMETER PIPES - FLAT SURFACES USE CAVST-IG CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCORPORATED,OR EQUAL OWNER Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT: MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS. KM Uz UP Ferry RW Ew q,w oe3ae M�Ujlu mcr vam Phos: (BOB)sWMW F. 0)538 U58 wu fml w-m1 2. OB/25/10 APPROVALS $ DATE: PROJECT NAME: I. 05/03/10 cl) tl DATE: iZ DATE SOUTgOLD DRAWING NO.: DATE, PROJECT ADDRESS: ST 3 R / F., DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD ucE CONST., DATE, PECONIC, NY. 1195B PROJECT tt: SITE ID >t: DRAWING TITLE: P C CNKD DRN: DATE. 090507 ANODE INSTALLATION ❑ MLB ISR 01/29/10 CADWELD METAL CADWELD WELD METAL IS A MIXTURE OF COPPER OXIDE AND ALUMINUM, PACKAGED IN PLASTIC TUBES. EACH TUBE CONTAINS THE STARTING POWDER AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PLASTIC TUBE, WITH THE WELD METAL ON THE TOP. THE CONTAINERS ARE PACKAGED WITH METAL DISKS IN BOXES OF 20. THE CADWELD METAL CAN BE HANDLED AND STORED WITHOUT DANGER OF SPONTANEOUS IGNITION. BOXES MAY BE SHIPPED WITHOUT SPECIAL PACKAGING OR MARKING. ERICO CA15 WITH F-33 ALLOY, OR EQUAL, SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTIONS OF CABLE TO STEEL,CABLE TO STAINLESS STEEL,OR CABLE TO CABLE. CABLE SLEEVE A TUBULAR METAL SLEEVE IS REQUIRED OVER THE #12 WIRE THAT IS SUPPLIED WITH THE ANODES TO PREVENT LOSS OF MOLTEN MATERIAL DURING THE WELDING PROCESS. THE SLEEVE IS INSTALLED OVER THE WIRE PRIOR TO INSERTION INTO THE MOLD.ERICO CAB133-IH,OR EQUAL. EXECUTION ANODE BAG INSTALLATION THE SPECIFIED SIZE AND TYPE OF ANODE SHALL BE INSTALLED NEAR THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT(S) REQUIRING CATHODIC CORROSION PROTECTION.EACH ANODE SHALL BE PLACED IN A SEPARATE EXCAVATION AND POSITIONED AT AN ELEVATION BELOW THE ANTICIPATED POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT AT A DISTANCE BETWEEN 3 AND 10 FEET FROM THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT. WELD LOCATION THE ATTACHMENT POINT SHALL BE TO THE ANCHOR SHAFT AS CLOSE TO THE TOP PIER PLATFORM,PILE CAP OR ANCHOR TRANSITION AS PRACTICAL. SURFACE PREPARATION THE POINT OF ATTACHMENT ON THE PILE SHAFT SHALL BE CLEANED TO BARE METAL BY REMOVING OIL,DIRT, RUST,GALVANIZING AND/OR PAINT ONLY IN THE AREA THAT WILL DIRECTLY RECEIVE THE WELD.THIS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY FILING, GRINDING OR ROTARY WIRE BRUSHING THE AREA. AFTER CLEANING,PROVIDE REFERENCE MARK TO AID IN ALIGNING MOLD TO SHAFT. CAUTION: FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, PAYING PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO ANY PRODUCT WARNINGS. WELDING REQUIRES A RAPID BURNING OF A STARTING POWDER THAT CREATES INTENSE HEAT.IT 1S IMPORTANT THAT THE PERSON PERFORMING THE WELDING USE ALL RECOMMENDED SAFETY DEVICES. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMEND-ATION AND TO WEAR PROPER PROTECTIVE DEVICES COULD RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY! WELDING SELECTING THE MOLD SELECT THE PROPER SIZE MOLD FOR THE APPLICATION. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE MOLD FIT PROPERLY TO THE CURVATURE OF THE SHAFT. BEFORE THE FIRST CONNECTION OF THE DAY, DRY THE MOLD AND WARM IT USING A TORCH TO APPROXIMATELY 2500 F. INSTALL ANODE WIRE INSPECT THE WIRE TO BE SURE THAT THE CONDUCTOR IS CLEAN, DRY AND NOT DEFORMED. BENT OR DEFORMED CABLE MAY HOLD THE MOLD OPEN OR LEAK. INSTALL A CAB133-IH METAL SLEEVE OVER THE BARE #12 WIRE LEADING TO THE ANODE. ALLOW THE CONDUCTOR TO PROTRUDE 1/8 INCH BEYOND THE SLEEVE. POSITION THE WIRE AND SLEEVE IN THE WIRE SLOT IN THE MOLD ADJACENT TO THE WELD CAVITY. CLOSE THE MOLD AND LOCK TIGHTLY. OWNS NConsulting Engineers, In CLIENT: MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS: l . ,I)W'Wudsv�&hwaM wa.*.0 an b06m®senegr ��1^�" een810L eert uo 32 WW Upp,r F,„y R#W Ewip,woeexa 85'd85+: NaloStwmra j` Phdw: (808)53&0100 Fa 0)536885! 11=71= m 2. OB/25/10 APPROVALS 6 DATE: PROJECT NAME: I. OB/03/10 . NO.DATE I(i SOUTHOLD DRAwmG No.: 5.A-C., DATE. '! PROJECT ADDRESS: T R / F.. DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD U cONST.- DATE PECONIC, NY. IIg58 PROJEC- #: SITE ID tt CRANING TITLE. P C WD: CRN. DATE 9 080507 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ML6 JSRI 01/2q/10 INSTALL ANODE WIRE INSPECT THE WIRE TO BE SURE THAT THE CONDUCTOR IS CLEAN, DRY AND NOT DEFORMED. BENT OR DEFORMED CABLE MAY HOLD THE MOLD OPEN OR LEAK. INSTALL A CAB133-1H METAL SLEEVE OVER THE BARE #12 WIRE LEADING TO THE ANODE. ALLOW THE CONDUCTOR TO PROTRUDE 1/8 INCH BEYOND THE SLEEVE. POSITION THE WIRE AND SLEEVE IN THE WIRE SLOT IN THE MOLD ADJACENT TO THE WELD CAVITY. CLOSE THE MOLD AND LOCK TIGHTLY. INSTALL CADWELD METAL INSERT ONE METAL DISK PACKAGED WITH THE CADWELD METAL INTO THE BOTTOM OF THE CHAMBER. OPEN ONE PLASTIC TUBE CONTAINING THE WELDING METAL AND STARTING POWDER. CAREFULLY INSTALL THE LOOSE WELDING METAL ON TOP OF THE METAL DISK IN THE CHAMBER. PACKAGED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PLASTIC TUBE IS THE STARTING POWDER.CAREFULLY REMOVE THE STARTING POWDER FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE TUBE AND PLACE THE POWDER ON TOP OF THE WELDING METAL.AS AN AID IN IGNITION,ALLOW A SMALL AMOUNT OF STARTING POWDER TO REST ON THE TOP OF THE MOLD NEAR THE IGNITION PORT. CLOSE THE TOP OF THE MOLD. IGNITION AND WELDING PLACE THE MOLD AGAINST SHAFT, CAREFULLY ALIGNING THE MOLD TO THE REFERENCE MARK(S) ON THE SHAFT. WEARING GLOVES AND EYE PROTECTION, CAREFULLY ALIGN THE MOLD AGAINST THE SHAFT DIRECTLY OVER THE AREA THAT WAS PREPARED TO ACCEPT THE CADWELD. APPLY PRESSURE AGAINST THE MOLD TO INSURE CONTACT WHILE IGNITING THE STARTING POWDER USING AN APPROVED IGNITION DEVICE THAT IS SUPPLIED WITH THE MOLD.CONTINUE TO HOLD THE MOLD AGAINST THE SHAFT FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 SECONDS FOLLOWING IGNITION TO INSURE THAT THE MOLTEN METAL HAS SOLIDIFIED. WARNING: 1. WEAR PROTECTIVE CLOTHING,EYE PROTECTION AND GLOVES WHILE WELDING. 2. PERSONNEL SHOULD BE PROPERLY TRAINED IN THE USE OF THESE PRODUCTS. 3. MAKE SURE THAT THE PROPER MOLD IS USED TO FIT THE DIAMETER OF THE SHAFT. 4. DO NOT USE WORN OR BROKEN EQUIPMENT,WHICH COULD CAUSE LEAKAGE. 5. DO NOT ALTER OR MODIFY EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS. 6. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE WELD MATERIALS. 7. AVOID MOISTURE AND CONTAMINANTS IN THE MOLD AND WELD MATERIALS. 8. AVOID EYE CONTACT WITH THE "FLASH" OF LIGHT FROM THE IGNITION OF THE STARTING MATERIAL. 9. AVOID BREATHING CONCENTRATIONS OF SMOKE, AS IT MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH. 10. PROVIDE ADEQUATE VENTTLATION WHERE NATURAL ABIFLOW IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT PERSONNEL FROM BREATHING CONCENTRATIONS OF SMOKE. 11. AVOID CONTACT WITH HOT MATERIALS. 12. ADVISE NEARBY PERSONNEL OF WELDING IN THE AREA. 13. PROTECT THE IMMEDIATE AREA FROM FIRE HAZARDS. 14. DO NOT SMOKE. MOLD REMOVAL AND INSPECTION OPEN THE MOLD AND REMOVE THE MOLD FROM THE SHAFT.CAREFULLY INSPECT THE WELD TO ENSURE THAT ALL OF THE CADWELD METAL WAS PROPERLY FORMED AROUND THE WIRE, SLEEVE AND SHAFT. THE WELD SHOULD BE UNIFORM AND FULLY PENETRATE ALL AREAS. IF THE WELD IS NOT PERFECT,REPEAT THE WELD IN AN ADJACENT AREA. owNER:WKM Consulting Engineers, Inc. cuENr: MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS: YWa'-DiuNygned64RQ�.larMovgamx pDW ilpole111E MO u WY Upper Fe"Rmd EM^7.NJ 08M Pl -. (m)53Bd00 Fes (BW)53B9BSB r.,a fnxl w-me 2. 08/25/10 APPROVALS t DATE: PROJECT NAME. I. OB/03/10 DATEA 5OUTHOLD DRAWING No.: S.A.C. DATE PROJECT ADDRESS: T q R/ F.. DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD u cDNST.: DATE, PECONIG, NY. IIg58 PROJEC tt: SITE ID p 11DRANING TITLE: cqr D: DRN DATE. O W7 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. P CMLB JSR01/2q/10 CORROSION PROTECTION OF WELDED AREA AFTER THE WELDED AREA HAS COOLED,THE WELD, SLEEVE,WIRE AND BARE METAL ON THE SHAFT SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST CORROSION USING ANY RECOGNIZED PRODUCTS DESIGNED FOR COLD APPLICATION CORROSION PROTECTION,SUCH AS ZINC RICH PAINT(ZRC),COLD TAR EPDXY,ETC.THE ENTIRE AREA SHALL BE COATED WITH AT LEAST THREE COATS AND CAREFULLY INSPECTED TO SEE THAT THERE ARE NO GAPS,VOIDS OR THINLY COATED AREAS. CLEAN-UP REMOVE SLAG AND DUST FROM THE MOLD WITH A CLEAN RAG,PAINT BRUSH OR MOLD CLEANING TOOL. DO NOT USE A WIRE BRUSH.BACKFILL AROUND THE SHAFT AND ANODE USING SOIL THAT WAS REMOVED DURING THE EXCAVATION. DO NOT BACKFILL WITH A MATERIAL FOREIGN TO THE SITE. LEAVE THE AREA CLEAN AND FREE OF DEBRIS.GRADE FOR PROPER DRAINAGE. owNER O F N F. T" I( Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT: MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS. UWMUPWF*n/ Ewft!43 azn d1 wc�uo�. Plan: (M)63644M Fac (808)59611558 'li:.0 i�:, FUE1nU M-sw 2. 08/25/10 APPROVALS t DATE: PROJECT NAME: I. 05/03/10 OWNER: DATE: NO. DATE SOUTHOLD DRAwiNG No: ' S.A.C.: DATE: PROJECT ADDRESS: R / F.: DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD ST-3.3 u CONST.: DATE: PECONIC, NY. Ilg58 PROJEC �. SITE ID a DRAWING TITLE: P C CIJKD. DRN DATE: 9 0010507 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ❑ P1LB J5R01/2q/IO SUBSOIL INVESTIGATIONS - SOIL MECHANICS DDULLOH(� 3 99DG [G6 QCa 3770 MERRICK ROAD SEAFORD, L. I., NEW YORK 11763 (5161 221-2333 • FAX (516) 221-0254 0 January 25, 2010 K M CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Re: 130 Ft. Self Supported 32 West Upper Ferry Road Triangular Tower Ewing,NJ 08628 41405 Highway 25 Att: Linda J. Bailey Peconic,NY Our Job#10-040 Dear Ms. Bailey: Forwarded herewith are copies of the log for drilling work completed at the above referenced site. One(1)test boring was drilled to a depth of 27 feet in an effort to provide the soil characteristics at the site. A 2"diameter,2'0"long split spoon sampler was advanced into the subsurface by the use of an automatic 140 lb. hammer with a 30"drop. From the drops of the hammer,blow counts required to advance the split spoon sampler over each 6"interval were recorded and are shown on the boring logs. Split spoon samples were taken every 5 feet thereafter to the final depth. Our investigation revealed that the area drilled is blanketed by 3 feet of fill, underlain, generally,by a moderately dense to dense, coarse to fine sand formation with traces of silt and gravel extending to the deepest depth drilled. Natural ground water was encountered at a depth of 14'4"below existing grade at the time the boring was taken. All soils below the fill will satisfactorily support foundation loads of 2 tons per square foot and exhibit excellent drainage characteristics. With respect to seismic,the site is classified as Category"D" according to the International Building Code (IBC)and New York State Building Code. TEST BORINGS. GROUND WATER DETERMINATIONS. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS. HOLLOW STEM AUGER BORINGS LABORATORY ANALYSES. CONTROLLED LANDFILL. DIAMOND CORE DRILLING .SAND 6 GRAVEL PROSPECTING BEARING VALUES. WELL POINT INSTALLATIONS. ENGINEERING SUPERVISION.PERCOLATION TESTS SANITARY INVESTIGATIONS. UNDISTURBED SAMPLING.TEST PITS.TOP SOIL ANALYSES ~ SOIL MECHARICS DDEML" ` & C9( GDU [EI 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD, L. I., NEW YORK 11783 (5161221-2333 • FAX(5161221-0254 K M CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. January 25,2010 Att: Linda J. Bailey Page 2 Frost penetration in this area is 3 feet. All exterior foundations should have a minimum of 3 foot of cover. The angle of internal friction of the natural sand is 34°. Soil samples recovered during drilling operations will be stored in our lab for a period of 30 days after which they will be destroyed. During this period we will deliver these samples to any prescribed location upon request. If after you examine the enclosed you have any further questions,please feel free to call and discuss them with us. Billing is enclosed. iarl SOORP. CV:mlf Encls. President MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��F soar P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �0� Southold, NY 11971 Chair y O OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS • 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI Comm Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 7, 2010 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re,Nielsen, Hubbard& Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington,NY 11743 RE: Letters from attorney Coughlin on Metro PCS &New Cingular @ Orient by the Sea(2) dated June 21, 2010, letter from attorney Re' on Metro PCS @ Southold Police Station dated June 22, 2010 and Letter from attorney Coughlin on Metro PCS @ Penny Lumber dated June 29, 2010. Dear Mr. Coughlin: We acknowledge receipt of your letter dated June 22, 2010 regarding the Town's use of a consultant to assist the Planning Board in its review of wireless facility applications. The use of a consultant is entirely discretionary and authorized by §280-74(A)(4) of the Town Code, as amended. Contrary to your suggestion,the use of a consultant is not predicated on the complexity of the application. In fact, the Moy case,which analyzed our Trustees use of a consultant pursuant to the authority granted under our Wetlands Code, has no bearing on the Planning Board's use of consultants in this or any wireless facility application. As you are aware the Southold Town Planning Board has deemed it necessary and reasonable to hire a consultant to help with the review of all wireless facility applications and has retained the services of Center for Municipal Services (CMS). The Planning Board has every confidence that the experts at CMS are highly qualified and have the requisite expertise to assist in the review of such applications. While you certainly have the right to review and comment on CMS' analysis of your application, your comments should be directed to the substance of their analysis. To expedite the review process, the Town requests that any response to the reviews issued by CMS be sent directly to CMS. CMS' review letters are reviewed and approved by the Planning Board prior to your receiving them and have the full support of the Planning Board. Further, in accordance with the provisions of our Town Code and as previously stated in our letter dated June 15, 2010,withdrawals will be made from time to time to reimburse the Town for the costs incurred for professional review and that determination is solely within the discretion of the Planning Board. At your request, the Town will provide you with a copy of our consultant's invoice for services rendered in conjunction with the review of your client's r s 0 0 applications,however, we do not and will not agree that payment of those services is subject to any determination by your firm regarding reasonableness or scope. In the event that the amount held in escrow by the Town exceeds the amount of actual invoicing at the conclusion of the project, the remaining balance will be refunded promptly. As for the completeness of your applications, you need only provide the information requested and your applications will be deemed complete and we can move to the next step in the process. To accomplish that goal, we strongly recommend a conference call between your firm, CMS and the individuals that are preparing your technical information to go over the comments in the letter, and specifically,what the Board deems necessary to complete the application. It should be further noted that the Planning Board concurs with CMS and that the above-referenced applications are incomplete at this time. The Planning Board must have the information requested to fulfill its obligation to due diligence in reviewing applications. We will continue to process the information you provide in a timely manner, as will our consultant. Very truly yours, Martin Sidor Planning Board Chair cc: CMS Martin D. Finnegan, Town Attorney • CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS • 70 CAMBRIDGE ROAD 518439-3079 GLENMONT,NEW YORK 12077 FAX:518478-0909 \ i July 1,2010 _ (via gmail and regular mail) Mr. Larry Re, Esq. Re,Nielsen,Huber&Coughlin, LLP 26 North New York Avenue _ 7 2010 Huntington,New York 11743 J U L Re: Southold NY Metro PCS 165 Peconic Lane Peconic f'MetroSPf or the"Applicant") Dear Mr. Re; We have reviewed the above referenced application received with cover letter dated April 22, 2010. For reasons we set forth below,we find that the application is incomplete in accordance the Wireless Facilities Statute for the Town of Southold("Wireless Facility Statute"). 1) According to Section 280-74 this application requires a fee of$2500 comprising of a$500 Building Application modification fee; a Site Plan Application fee of$1000 and a Special Exception Application fee of$1000. Your letter dated April 22, 2010 indicates that the Applicant enclosed the fees in connection with the Site Plan Application and Special Exception Application,however,please provide evidence that the fee of$500 was paid in connection with the Building Application. 2) §280-74(B) (1) (b)requires written documentation as to the facility's structural compliance with applicable laws. To this end, the applicant provided a report prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., documenting the proposed facility's structural compliance with applicable law as well as a Tower Reinforcement Drawings & Specifications (collectively referred to as"KMC's Report"). KMC's Report is not a structural verification because it is insufficient for the following reasons: i)the designed of appurtenance loading(on page 4 and load case no.1 of the KMC Report)does not include the top two existing carriers on the tower; ii)the Tower Reinforcement Drawing& Specification provides that there was a geotechnical report by Soil Mechanics Drilling Corp., dated January 25, 2010,however, such report is not included in the application materials; and iii)the Tower Reinforcement Drawing& Specification does not contain calculations of the foundation or the capacity of the new foundation. Moreover,all of the calculations are incorrect because the load of the tower is incorrect. A complete and accurate report must be provided. 3) The propagation maps provided are incomplete as follows: Mr. Balzano, in his affidavit dated October 29,2009,provided signal strengths that he claims are required by MetroPCS for in-building commercial, in-building residential and in-vehicle reliable service. Although we agree with his signal in connection with the In-Vehicle Coverage and In- Building Residential coverage we do not agree with that a signal level of-75dBm is necessary to provide reliable hi-Building Commercial coverage. We believe a signal level of-85dBM is sufficient for both residential and commercial hl-Building coverage. If MetroPCS believes that they require stronger signal level they need to provide detailed proof as to why such signal strength is required. The area of coverage surrounding the proposed site is comprised of buildings three stories high or less whereby we believe that-85dBm will provide reliable in building coverage (With-95dBm providing reliable in-vehicle coverage). Therefore we do not understand the reason for map 3, in-building commercial. hl addition, we do not see is what ERP was imput into the propagation model. (See attached Propa a�g tion Study Requirements and Propagation Data Study sheet . We require new propagation maps utilizing the ERP as calculated on the Propagation data sheet done at-85dBm and-95dBm. 0 9 We are aware that MetroPCS is proposing additional sites in Southold. Why are no other sites shown on the propagation maps? 4) Section 280-74(C)provides no new antenna support structures may be constructed without a carrier licensed by the FCC as a provider. The Applicant's FCC license indicates that the Applicant has radio service AW–AWS, 1710– 1755/2110-2155 MHz bands. However,the Pinnacle Telecom Group Antenna FCC FR Compliance Assessment and Report for MetroPCS dated October 14,2009 provides that the Applicant is going to be operating with the frequency band of 2130–2140 MHz. There is a clear contradiction here. Is the Applicant going to be operating in 1710-1755 MHz bands as authorized under the license or only in the 2110–2155 MHz Band?The correct and consistent documents must be provided. In addition page 6-7 as well as page 11 of the pinnacle report discusses 4 existing carriers(Nextel,AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon),however, other documents only shows 3 existing carriers. Which is correct? This impacts RF emissions. Incorrect documents need to be revised. 5) Section 280–70(M) (d)—Metro PCS has not commented on improving the landscaping at the site. What landscaping improvement does the Applicant propose? The visual impact of the shelter and accessory equipment at the bottom of the tower should be reduced by appropriate landscaping measures. 8) §280-74(C)(4)-Vicinity Plan—the print A-8 titled 500' Radius Property Owners List provides the property owners as of May 8, 2009. Such list is outdated as the list was compiled over a year ago. In your next submission please provide an updated list. 9) It is our understanding that the lattice tower is over five(5)years old and to insure that the structure is safe,thus protecting the health, safety and welfare of Southold's citizens as is required in the purpose of the code(section 280-67), an inspection per ANSI 222-F is required. In your next submission you can include the inspection report,or we can accept an acknowledgement that the inspection will be conducted after the issuance of the Special Use Permit, if granted,prior to the issuance of a building permit and start of construction and that any discrepancies found during the inspection will be corrected prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. 10)Pursuant to §280-133 and the Site Plan Application Checklist the following items are missing and/or incomplete for the application: • Grading and drainage plan with calculations; and • Proposed landscape plan; Until you provide the required information as noted above,we are unable to make our recommendation to the Town that the application is complete. We strongly recommend a conference call with you to go over the comments in this letter, specifically to review what we believe is necessary to complete the application. We invite you to include the individuals that are preparing the technical information propagation maps, data sheet,tower drawings and calculations to be included in the call. This will help insure the completeness of your next submittal. Please contact Denise Benun at 212 921-5527 to establish the date and time for the call. Sinc ly, R har A. Comi CMS cc: Town Planning Board(via email and regular mail) Denise Benun(via email) Heather Lanza(via email) • Propa ag tion Study Requirements • Propagation studies are required with the application to prove the need for any new tower site,or co-location on any existing structure where there is an increase in the height of the structure or any modification where there is an increase in the height of the antenna(s)on the structure. .(If service at the site is proposed for the cellular frequency band(800—900 MHz),even if the site will also utilize other frequencies,the studies need to be done at the cellular frequency band.) For a new tower or where there would be an increase the height of the existing tower or other structure,two propagation studies are required;one are the proposed height and another set of studies at to' lower, unless something different is otherwise agreed to at the pre-application meeting.(Along with the lower propagation study should be a narrative that describes why the lower height is not sufficient)If the application is for co-locating on an existing tower or other structure without increasing the height of the existing tower or structure,then propagation studies are only required at the height proposed by the applicant. Legend:Propagation studies are to include a legend on each sheet showing the following at a minimum: 1)a scale of miles or distance of no smaller than 1"to 1/2 mile;and 2)color coded of signal strength designations at-1O1dBm for"on-street"service,-95 bBm for"in-vehicle"service and-85 dBm for"in-building"service(except in urban areas where it can be demonstrated that there are several four story or larger buildings in the proposed coverage area).It is preferable that Propagation studies be provided on clear acetate sheets so that they may be overlaid and more easily read individually or in conjunction with each other,as may be necessary for proper analysis. A base map of the community on which to overlay the propagation study is needed that must show and identify the major roads in the intended service area.For any proposed site located less than 2 miles from a community's boundary,the boundary must be shown on the map. The base map must be the same scale as the overlay propagation maps. Note: Only signal strengths of-101 dBm for"on-street"service,—95 dBm Lor In-Vehicle service and—85 dBm Lor In-Building service will be considered in the context of the need for the facility and the need for the requested height,unless the facility is intended to serve an urban market.This is based on the accepted losses inherent with each situation and the ability of the hand unit to function normally at—106 dBm. Note: The Applicant must state whether the propose facility dest n is for in-vehicle coverage L dBm)or in- buildin coverage(-85 dam. If an applicant believes it needs different signal strength levels,such must be justified in sufficient detail to allow verification of the technological need,such as a statement or explanation by the phone manufacturer or the carrier that greater signal strengths are needed and why lesser signal strengths will not permit the handset to function as designed or certain services to be provided in a functional context.Note that the local regulatory body is not required to ant an a licant's "best case"or most desired situation but rather what will enable the handset to function as designed and the service to be reliable. Note:Propagation studies must be accompanied by all modeling information used to produce them(using the provided"Data Sheet for Propagation Study"form),including,but not limited to the ERP(Effective Radiated Power)from the site/facility that is the subject of the application and all adi cent sites/facilities and the cut sheets from all equipment showiniz the o eratin characteristics,such as,for purposes of example: ❑ The power of the radios stated in watts ❑ The gains and losses from each component of all equipment tener unici al Solutions PrStud Data Sheet for Propose- Facility licant: Nameltitle person completing form: PName: Site Address: Instrue this form,attachradio and antenna spec sheets and include with the RF Propagation Study. All nearby sites(ad proviand near the proposed site are to be included in the study. Use an additional forth if more than 3 sites Line No. ITEM UNIT Proposed site Adjacent site#1 Adjacent site#2 Adjacent site Data Data Data GENERAL INFO: #1 Site Name #2 Site Address #3 Tower or structure height feet #4 Antenna mounting height agl feet #5 Network Technology #6 Operating Frequency MgHz #7 Base Station Manufacturer #8 Base Station Model# #9 Radio Max Power Watts #10 Is pilot channel used for propagation(yes or no) #11 If yes,pilot channel power Watts (min.20%of power) #12 Convert Power to dBm dBm #13 Losses: #14 Is there a combiner #15 If yes make and model #16 If yes,combiner loss dB #17 Cable losses: #18 Cable diameter In. #19 Cable Igth.From antenna to Ft equipment N#2 Cable loss per 100 ft. dB Calculated loss dB Connectors Number of connectors Loss per connector dB Calculated Loss dB #26 Jumpers: #27 Number of jumpers #28 Loss per jumper dB #29 Calculated lossi dB #30 Total calculated loss: dB #31 Gains: #32 Is there an in line amplifier #33 If yes,gain dB #34 Antenna Mftg. #35 Antenna Model# #36 lAntenna gain dB #37 ITotal gain: d6 #38 Result: #39 Transmission Power dBm #40 ERP Watts To Calculate ERP (Line#40)of an Antenna: VT*4 : Insert the ra wer in 747t e 9and pilot pown Line 11.:Convert the ra io power er, as applicableinto dBm untsInsert the result into Line #12 :Add all dB losses: Line# 21+Line#25+Line#29; Insert theresult into Line#30 :Add all dB gains: Line#336; Insert the result into Line#37:Add Line#37 to Line#12t from the result, Line#30. Insert the result into Line#39. :Convert the number in LiWatts. Record the result in Line#40. RE,NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP -V ATTORNEYS AT LAW ��� 36 NORTH Naw Yoga AVENUE HUNTINGTON, Naw YOas 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 428-4100 FACSZMILE: (631) 428-4104 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN June 28, 2010 BY HAND Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner JUN 2 9 Town of Southold Planning Board 2010 Town Annex Building f So.,hmd T, n 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (Site No. NY7315) Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic, New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000— 75 —5 — 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: We represent MetroPCS New York, LLC with respect to the subject application, which was filed with your office on February 25, 2010. We enclose the following documents to supplement our application: 1. Two (2) signed and sealed copies of correspondence of MTM Design Group, Inc., dated June 23, 2010, regarding Grading & Drainage information. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RE, NIELSENN,, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: - C J nT'Cougl n JJC/mp Enclosures • ARIAM • DESIGNz GROUP-, A R C H I T E C T U R E ENGINEERING •PO BOX 3 • HAZLEF,NEW JERSEY 07730 •TEL 732 888 6210 • FAX: 732 847 4335• June 23, 2010 Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Planning Board Reference: Peconic Police Department : Metro PCS Application 41405 Route 25, Peconic, NY 11958 Section: 75, Block: 5, Lot: 14.1 Metro PCS Project#: NY7315, MTM#: 09MPSTS008 To Whom It May Concern: With reference to the above noted site regarding the drainage and grading at the existing telecommunication facility on the property, please note the following. The existing native soil in the area of the proposed equipment is pervious and comprised of sand and gravel and would not pose any drainage problems. The proposed equipment will be mounted on a new 10' x 14' (140 Square Feet) concrete slab adjacent to the existing fenced equipment compound. The concrete slab will allow for any potential precipitation to pass to the existing pervious surface. The impact of the 140 SF of impervious surface created with the proposed concrete slab in comparison to the overall size of the existing property and the existing grading and drainage will be negligible. As depicted on the construction documents submitted concurrently, the proposed equipment areas are to be mildly re-graded such that it is relatively level with the adjacent existing surrounding areas. No retaining walls or radical changes in surface features or runoff are proposed. If you sho ve any questions, or need any additional information, please feel free to contact our offic ° cv/ o � ou o ti 0 F OF NO cc: File DE 'SIGNz GROUT4 ARC H ITECTURE EN G I N E ERI N G •PO BOX 3 • HAZLEI,NEW JERSEY 07730 •TEL 732 888 6210 • FAX: 732 8474335• June 23, 2010 Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Planning Board Reference: Peconic Police Department: Metro PCS Application 41405 Route 25, Peconic, NY 11958 Section: 75, Block: 5, Lot: 14.1 Metro PCS Project#: NY7315, MTM#: 09MPSTS008 To Whom It May Concern: With reference to the above noted site regarding the drainage and grading at the existing telecommunication facility on the property, please note the following. The existing native soil in the area of the proposed equipment is pervious and comprised of sand and gravel and would not pose any drainage problems. The proposed equipment will be mounted on a new 10' x 14' (140 Square Feet) concrete slab adjacent to the existing fenced equipment compound. The concrete slab will allow for any potential precipitation to pass to the existing pervious surface. The impact of the 140 SF of impervious surface created with the proposed concrete slab in comparison to the overall size of the existing property and the existing grading and drainage will be negligible. As depicted on the construction documents submitted concurrently, the proposed equipment areas are to be mildly re-graded such that it is relatively level with the adjacent existing surrounding areas. No retaining walls or radical changes in surface features or runoff are proposed. If y ; h questions, or need any additional information, please feel free to contact our o J� osgz �L To- r o A Lo '�A 92 OQ MT Qtb c. cc: Metro PCS File 1cL� RE,NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP Cbrh��/3�envYt ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEw YORE AVENUE HUNTINGTON, Naw YORH 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN June 22, 2010 Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair �' �'� ], Town of Southold , Town Annex Building 1 ,�� Z 4 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 ` RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (`MetroPCS') Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic,New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75 — 5 — 14.1 Dear Mr. Sidor: We have received and reviewed your correspondence, dated June 15, 2010, regarding our client's deposit for the Town's technical consultant review services. As you are no doubt aware, MetroPCS, has an urgent need to remedy a significant service gap in the vicinity of the proposed site. Our client's applications for Site Plan Approval and Special Exception Permit were filed on February 25, 2010. Accordingly, our client does not wish to have the review of its applications further delayed by a dispute with respect to how the escrow funds deposited with the Town should be administered. Rather, we simply request that the Town abide by the provisions of the Town of Southold Code and established case law as it relates to the payment of fees for technical expert consultants. MetroPCS does not contest that the Town has the authority, pursuant to its Code, to request that the applicant pay for fees for technical experts that are reasonable and that are reasonably necessary for the review of complex technical data that is beyond the ability of the Town to review. Indeed, in Moy v Board of Town Trustees, 61 A.D. 3d 763 (2d Dept.2009), the Court stated: Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the Board of Town Trustees of the Town of Southold (hereinafter the Board) acted within its discretion in hiring an outside consultant and requiring the petitioners to pay the consultant's fee. Under Town of Southold Code § 275-7 (D), the Board has the discretion to hire an outside consultant and require the applicant to pay the consultant's fee when the Board determines that the "complexity of the activity, the difficulty in Town of Southold Planning Rd Re: MetroPCS at Southold Police Dept. June 22, 2010 Page 2 of 2 determining the threat to the resource areas or the size of the request or project involves and requires more information and analysis than can reasonably be supplied to the Board without independent technical professional assistance." Here, not only did the Board state at a public hearing that the application was complicated, but the petitioners' expert acknowledged that the proposal presented "a difficult application" for the Board. The application now pending before the Board is to simply collocate on the existing Town's Police Department tower. In contrast to Moy, the affixing of small panel antennas on the tower and the installation of equipment cabinets next to the existing equipment cabinets, is not a "difficult application" that would require the assistance of a technical expert. Moreover, your attention is respectfully directed to the decision of the United States District Court in Howard v Town of Bethel 481 F. Supp. 2d 295 (S.D. N.Y. 2007). In that case, the plaintiffs contended that the Town's practice of imposing consultant fees in connection with evaluating their application for a special use permit violated its 14u' Amendment right to procedural due process. The Court noted that the Bethel Town Code provided that "any applicant may request to inspect said invoices and vouchers submitted by an expert retained by the Town." Significantly, the plaintiff in that case failed to make such a request. The Court noted that the failure of the Planning Board to confer with the Applicant did not rise to the level of a due process violation "particularly in light of the fact that the Plaintiffs had the opportunity to audit the fees and verbally address them with the Planning Board." We believe that a failure by the Town to provide MetroPCS the opportunity to audit the technical consultant's fees prior to the Town's payment of same would violate MetroPCS' due process rights and would be a breach of the Town's fiduciary duty as escrow agent. Our office has long enjoyed a cordial relationship with the Town of Southold, and, in particular, with the Planning Board and Planning Department. We do not wish to be unnecessarily confrontational with respect to this issue. Rather, we simply request that the Town act in a reasonable manner by assigning to a consultant only tasks that are truly complex and technical in nature and that are within a consultant's expertise and to afford the applicant the opportunity to review the statements of such consultant. Be assured that our client simply wishes to provide reliable services to its licensed coverage area in a manner that is as unobtrusive as possible. We are committed to this goal and request that the Town review the application consistent with federal, state and Town law without further delay. Very truly yours, RE,NIELSEN, HUBER& COUGHLIN, LLP By: l Lawrence C. Rd LCR:mk cc: Martin Finnegan, Esq.,Town Attorney MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS S1)(J P.O.Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR _ Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIA34 J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 DONALD J. WILCENSKI (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND � Southold, NY Telephone:631765-1938 Fax: 681765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOL.D June 15, 2010 John J. Coughlin, Esq. Re, Nielsen, Hubbard & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC Telecommunications Facility SCTM #1000-75-5-14.1 Dear Mr. Coughlin: We acknowledge receipt of your letter dated June 4, 2010 enclosing the required deposit for the Town's technical consultant review services. In accordance with the provisions of our Town Code, withdrawals will be made from time to time to reimburse the Town for the costs incurred for professional review. While the Planning staff is free to provide you with a copy of our consultant's invoice for services rendered in conjunction with his or her review of your client's application, we do not and will not agree that payment of those services is subject to any determination by your firm regarding reasonableness or scope. That determination is solely within the discretion of the Planning Director. In the event that the amount held in escrow by the Town exceeds the amount of actual invoicing at the conclusion of the project, the remaining balance will be refunded promptly. Our consultant is prepared to proceed with his review of your application immediately. If you continue to insist on the escrow terms set forth in your letter, review of the application will be suspended, the escrow monies will be returned, and the application will be deemed incomplete pursuant to Section 280-74A(4). Please be guided accordingly. Very truly yours, Martin Sidor Planning Board Chair MS/lk cc: Martin D. Finnegan, Town Attorney RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH Naw YoEa AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEw YORK 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN June 4,2010 VIA UPS Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board - 7 20�� Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC Supplemental Escrow Fee for Consultant review of Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road), Main Road, NY SCTM#: 1000-75-5 - 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: In furtherance of the May 25, 2010 correspondence of Martin H. Sidor (copy attached hereto) and pursuant to §280-74 of Southold Town Code, enclosed herewith is MetroPCS New York, LLC check number 5769, payable to the Town of Southold, in the sum of$7,000.00, representing the supplemental amount to be held in escrow for the new technical consultant review fee. MetroPCS does not consent to the application of any funds in escrow for the payment of fees to Center for Municipal Solutions or any technical consultant until a detailed invoice for technical consultant services is provided to us and it is determined that the services provided are reasonable and that the services provided actually involved technical services outside the scope and capabilities of the Town's well qualified Planning and Building Department staff. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to communicate with the undersigned. Very truly yours, RE,NIELSEN, HUBER& COUGHLIN, LLP By: _ �Codggin JJC:mk Enclosures AGREEMENT This agreement made and entered into this j day of 2010 by and between RICHARD A. COMI d/b/a THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS(herein after referred to as Consultant)(mailing address:70 Cambridge Drive,Glenmont, New York 12077)party of the first part,and THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NY 11971 (hereinafter referred to as Client)(mailing address;Town Hall Annex 54375 SR 25 Southold, NY 11971)party of the second part. Consultant and Client,for the consideration named, hereby agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE Client hereby retains Consultant for the purpose of assisting,advising and representing the Client on matters relating to reviewing and analyzing a wireless application for Metro PCS for a proposed facility at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, received by client for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. 2. SPECIFIC SERVICES:SERVICES DURING PROCESSING OF THE APPLICATION The Consultant shall furnish appropriate Wireless Telecommunications Facilities siting assistance and advice to the Client and Client officials involved in the processing of the Metro PCS application for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities,and,in connection therewith,shall: a)review the application filed with the Client for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities,b)assist and advise the Client in the analysis of the application,to include attending meetings with the Applicants and/or Client officials as required, c) recommend in writing to the Client whether the application should be approved or disapproved, and set forth in writing the reasons for such approval or disapproval,d)inspect the construction of the facility and in writing recommend when/if the certificate of compliance should be issued. 3. TIMES AND ATTENDANCE:COOPERATION BY CLIENT Consultant shall perform the services described herein in as expeditious a manner as is reasonably possible and with due consideration of the time requirements of Client.Client recognizes that the timing of the performance of Consultant's services may be affected by previous commitments to other clients(including the delivery of promised services and work product and previously scheduled meetings),and situations normally and traditionally deemed to be matters of a force majeure nature, including those influenced by the weather, strikes, or power outages. Client agrees to cooperate with Consultant,as needed,and to provide Consultant with copies of any records, documents and other information needed for the fulfillment of this agreement on a timely basis. Client further agrees to provide Consultant with access to appropriate officials and/or employees of Client,as may be needed in the fulfillment of the agreement. Moreover, both parties understand and agree that mutual accountability and responsiveness is critical to the successful completion of the project,and therefore both shall always make their best faith efforts to be accountable and promptly responsive to each other. 4. COMPENSATION In payment for the services to be performed hereunder by Consultant,Client shall make payments to the Consultant as follows: A) The Client shall pay Consultant its normal published hourly rate(which at the date of this agreement is$250.00 per hour)for each hour of time devoted by Consultant to the performance of such services, provided, however,that for time traveling by Consultant in conjunction with the performance of such services,the Client shall pay Consultant 50%of the Consultants normal published rate. It is understood that the costs for all services, including expenses as covered below,will not exceed $8,500.00 for the primary carrier on the new facility,without additional approval from the Client. B) Consultant shall invoice the Client regularly, but no less frequently than monthly,after services have been performed,for any compensation payable. Such invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt,but in no case later than thirty(30)days. C) In the event that the Client disputes or objects to any portion of any invoice submitted by Consultant pursuant to this agreement,Client shall,within fifteen(15)days of the receipt of such invoice, notify Consultant in writing of such dispute or objection. D) Payments made by the Client more than thirty(30)days following the date of submission of an invoice shall incur a charge of one and one-half percent(1-1/2%)of the amount thereby deemed late, compounded monthly,until the amount due and owing by the Client is paid in full. 5. REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES For services performed hereunder,Client shall reimburse Consultant,for out-of-pocket expenses for the following items: (a)Travel-related costs such as airfare,car rental, night lodging accommodations and meals consumed while on-site or enroute;(b)Expedited or overnight delivery service;(c)Any other reasonably necessary expenses directly related and attributable to the fulfillment of this agreement. 1 Consultant's requests for expense reimbursement shall be included in Consultant's invoice at actual cost,with no markup. 6. STATUS OF CONSULTANT Consultant and Client agree that in the performance of Consultant's services hereunder,Consultant shall not be deemed to be an employee of Client for any purpose whatsoever, nor act under Color of State. 7. NOTICES Any and all notices, invoices, and payments required hereunder shall be addressed to the parties at their respective addresses set forth in page 1 hereof,or to such other address as may hereafter be designated in writing by either party hereto. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT This agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the Laws of the State of New York. 9. COMPLETE AGREEMENT: MODIFICATION There are no terms,conditions or obligations other than those contained herein,and there are no written or verbal statements or representations,warranties or agreements with respect to this Agreement that have not been embodied herein. This agreement constitutes the complete understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No modification or amendment of any provisions of this agreement shall be valid unless in writing and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF,the Consultant and Client by individuals duly authorized to do so,have signed this agreement,the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CLIENT T� By: P.J.C...(electronic signature) By:! R.A.Comi The Center for Municipal Solutions p�r t} } a - (printed) Title: JUN - 1 2610 j ; 2 c'r^s RE,NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP t4 ATTORNEYS AT LAW � 1 or 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN May 28, 2010 Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair Town of Southold Town Annex Building ' •9, 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 — RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC (`MetroPCS') Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic,New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000–75 – 5 – 14.1 Dear Mr. Sidor: We are in receipt of your correspondence dated May 25, 2010, wherein you advised that the Planning Board has decided to switch to a new technical consultant and to that end you request that an additional $7.000.00 be remitted to the Planning Board to be held in escrow to be added to the $1,500.00 already being held. Southold Town Code Section 280-73 addresses Special Exception Approval for wireless telecommunications sites. Paragraph B (2) of that Section states that approval shall not be granted unless "the applicant has made substantial effort to co-locate with existing wireless facilities or, failing that, has made substantial effort to locate on municipally owned land or structures, or within or on existing buildings or structures." MetroPCS has proposed a site that is in keeping with these Town standards in that it proposes to simply affix antennas on an already existing tower located on municipally owned land. Therefore it is surprising that 90 days following the filing of the application you are now informing us that the Town has decided to hire another consultant and is requesting additional funds. In our May 10, 2010 correspondence we cited Declaratory Ruling FCC 09-99, adopted on November 18, 2009 that states that a failure on the part of a municipality to render a decision with respect to an application to collocate within 90 days presumptively constitutes a failure to act. Under 47 USC Section 332 (c) (7) (B) (v). In fact, in its Declaratory Ruling in paragraph 43, the Federal Communications Commission discussed the reason supporting this 90 day time limit stating "the Petition proposes a 45-day timeframe for colocation applications...The Petition asserts that because no new towers need to be constructed, colocations are the easiest applications for State and local governments to review and, therefore, should reasonably be reviewing within a shorter period. The Petioner surveyed Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Applications May 28, 2010 Page 2 of 3 its members and found that colocations can take as little as a single day to review, and that all members responding had received zoning approval with 14 days." The Declaratory Ruling at paragraph 44 further provides "While we recognize that many applications can and perhaps should be processed within the timeframes proposed by the Petitioner we are concerned that these timeframes may be insufficiently flexible for general applicability. In particular, some applications may reasonably require additional time to explore collaborative solutions among the governments, wireless providers and affected communities. Also State and local government may sometimes need additional time to prepare a written explanation of their decisions as required by Section 332 (c) (7) (B) (iii) and the timeframes proposed may not accommodate reasonable, generally applicable procedural requirements in some communities. Although, as noted above, the reviewing court will have the opportunity to consider such unique circumstances in individual cases, it is important for purposes of certainty and orderly processing that the timeframe for determining when suit may be brought in fact accommodate reasonable processes in most instances." The Declaratory Ruling at paragraph 45 concludes "Based on our review of the record as a whole, we find 90 days to be a generally reasonable timeframe for processing colocation applications and 150 days to be a generally reasonable timeframe for processing applications other than colocations. Thus a lack of a decision within these timeframes presumptively constitutes a failure to act under Section 332 (c) (7) (B) (v)." Moreover the Declaratory Ruling at paragraph 46 states "We find that colocation applications can reasonably be processed within 90 days. Colocation applications are easier to process than other types of applications than other types of applications, as they do not implicate the affects upon the community that may result from new construction. In particular the addition of an antenna to an existing tower or other structure is unlikely to have a significant visual impact on the community, therefore, many jurisdictions do not require public notice or hearings for colocations. For purposes of this standard an application is a request for colocation if it does not involve a substantial increase in the size of the tower as defined in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Colocation of Wireless Antennas. Phis limitation will help io ensure the State and local government will have reasonable period of time to review those applications that may require extensive consideration." It is evident from the foregoing that the Federal Communication Commission determined that colocation applications can be reviewed in a short period of time but established a 90-day review period limitation to allow for more extensive review in certain more complicated colocation proposals. With respect to your request that an addition $7,000.00 be added the balance of the sums in escrow already on deposit with the Town, we question why an increase in the amount to be held in escrow for technical consultant review would be required for this simple application to colocate on an already existing tower on Town property. We will forward the request for this additional funding to our client. Please be advised that our client does not consent to the application of any funds in escrow for the payment of fees to a technical consultant until a detailed invoice for technical consultant services is provided to us and it is determined that the Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Applications May 28, 2010 Page 3 of 3 services provided are reasonable and that the services provided actually involved technical services outside the scope and capabilities of the Town's well qualified Planning and Building Department staff. Nor do we consent to any extension of the time required for review of this application. For the reasons noted above, the retention of a technical consultant, or in this case a second technical consultant, is unwarranted in light of the simple nature of this application and in light of the Declaratory Ruling. Our client is eager to provide reliable telecommunications services to the community. As the Federal Communications Commission stated in the Declaratory Ruling, "this record evidence demonstrates that unreasonable delays in the personal wireless service facility citing applications process has obstructed the provision of wireless services". It further stated that "the deployment of facilities without unreasonable delay is vital to promote public safety, including the availability of wireless 911, throughout the nation". Accordingly, we again respectfully request that the Public Hearings be scheduled immediately consistent with Federal and State law. Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HU & COUGHLIN, LLP By: w`rence C. Re LCR/cp • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��OFsouryo So P.O. ,Box 1179 11971 MARTIN H.SIDOR h� Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS �O 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �coUMY,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 25, 2010 Re, Nielsen, Huber&Coughlin, LLP All: Larry Re' 36 North New York Avenue Huntington NY 11743 Re: Metro PCS, Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM41000-75-5-14.1 Dear Mr. Re': Thank you for your letter of May 10, 2010. We apologize for the time it has taken to review the application to date. As you know we have received many applications in recent months, and have limited staff to review them. We are doing everything we can to expedite these reviews. One step we have taken is to switch to a new technical consultant, Center for Municipal Solutions,to assist the Planning Board. We expect this will help us process the applications in a timely manner, as we realize is required by the FCC. To transition to the new technical consultant,the Planning Board requires an escrow deposit of$8,500 for the new consultant to continue the review. Your client already has a credit of$1,500 (we will not expect payment for the prior technical consultant's work), thus the balance of$7,000 is all that is required to be remitted at this time. As always, any unused portion of the escrow amount will be returned to your client at the end of the application process. Preliminary review of the application by the Planning Board found the application to be incomplete. Upon receipt of the $7,000 escrow amount, our new consultant will promptly review the pending application and provide details on what further information is needed to complete the application. Application for Metro PCS Southold n.2 We are committed to processing the application in a timely manner and will do everything we can to make the process go as quickly as possible. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment and we look forward to the continued review of this application. Please do not hesitate to call the Planning Department with any questions. Sincerely, Martin H. Sidor Planning Board Chair Cc: Southold Town Planning Board Center for Municipal Solutions Martin Finnegan, Town Attorney, Heather Lanza, Planning Director Kristy Winser, Senior Planner 0 RE,NIELSEN,HUBER& COUGHLIN,LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 38 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE RVNTINOTON, NEW YORE 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FAcsIMII.E: (631) 425-4104 Or Cooxest WIL,,T eK J.NIEMEN May 10, 2010 VIA E-MAIL Ms. Heather Lanza,Planning Director Town of Southold Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York,LLC(`MetroPCS') Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane(a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic,New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75—5— 14.1 Dear Ms. Lanza: Our office represents MetroPCS in connection with the captioned matter. The Applications for Site Plan Approval and for Special Exception Permit were filed with your office on February 25, 2010. As you know,this application seeks permission to colocate on an existing monopole. By Declaratory Ruling adopted on November 18, 2009, (`The Declaratory Ruling') the Federal Communications Commission determined that the failure on the part of a municipality to render a decision with respect to an application to colocate a telecommunications facility within 90 days presumptively constitutes a failure to act under 47 U. S. C. Section 332 (c) (7) (B) (v). The Declaratory Ruling provides that the aforementioned time period is measured from the date a complete application is filed. It also states that a municipality is bound to notify applicants within a reasonable period of time if it determines an application is incomplete. Accordingly, in light of the filing date, we shall presume that the application for this proposal has been deemed complete as of today's date. With the foregoing in mind we respectfully request that the Town of Southold take all steps necessary to comply with the Declaratory Ruling. Thanking you for your courtesies,we remain Very truly yours, RE,NIELSEN,HUBER&COUGHLIN, LLP By: Lawvevz&C. Rpi Lawrence C. R6 LCR/cp INVOICE Walter A.Cooper 117 Walnut Hitls Drive INVOICE NO. 1 Williamsburg,VA 23185 DATE May 17,2010 757-220-9442 CLIENT Town of Southold,W walterc000ercDverizon.net Chent'sReference No. SCTM#+1000-75-5-14.1 (P.O.No.21306) �-- TO Ms.Kristy Moser Senior Planner 53095 Route 25 PO Box 1179 5ou0rold,NV 11971 DESCROITNN OFSERVICES PROJECT 777 PACMEMTERMS DUE DATE Review of Meud'CS Wireless Facility Application MMroPCS @ Southold Police Station 2%/10 Net 30 6/17/10 QUANIiTV. . :DATE .DESCRIPTION UNIT PPJCE LINE TOTAL 2.0 4/30/2010 Initial Review of Application S 100.00 $ 200.00 2.5 5/5/2010 Prepare and submit Report No.1 100.00 250.00 SERVICE TOTAL S 450.00 EXPENSE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL $ 450.00 Make all checks payable to Walter A.Cooper Vendor No. Town of Southold, New York- Payment Voucher 3576 Vendor Tax ID Number or Social Security Number Vendor Address `123 - - DS23 t a� Vendor Name Walter A. Cooper 2 7- Vendor Telephone Number S 7 -.22 o- 2 Vmdor Contact Invoice Invoice Invoice Net Purchase Order Consulting work Number Date Total Discount Amount Claimed Number Description of Goods or Services 5 i ro w 7 Pew"T--Male C , 4 �� 5 B 8020 4 500 500 8020 4 500 500 ail o . �� �� �So. LB.691 (defErred) 1,150.00 $1,150.00 B2115.30 revenue Payee Certification Department Certification The undersigned(Claimant)(Acting on behalf of the above named claimant) - I hereby certify that the materials above specified have been received by me does hereby certify that the foregoing claim is true and comect,that no part has m good condition without substitution,the services properly been paid,except as therein stated,that the balance therein stated is actually performed and that the quantities thereof have been verified with the exceptions due and owing,and that taxes which the Town is exempt are excluded. or discrepancies noted,and payment is approved. Signature Tide Signature _... Company Name me TW t....,� `D .'{'. Date C) • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��Of SOUjyo Southold,oix 1 i s71 MARTIN H.SIDOR �O Chair y_ +� OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS d+ be Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS : �pQ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND yriou01 Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 21, 2010 Ms. Denise S. Benun 16 Drake Lane Manhasset,NY 11030 Re: Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Ms. Benun: Enclosed herewith please find an application package and CD regarding the above- referenced site plan/special exception proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter,please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours,I '1 Kristy Wins Senior Planner Encls. cc: Richard Comi (cover letter) RE,NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEw YORE AVENVE HUNTINGTON, Naw YORH 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 Or GouxeaL WILLIAM J.NIELSEN April 8, 2010 VIA UPS Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC Consultant Fees for review of Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at: Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic, New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75 — 5 — 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: In furtherance of your March 31, 2010 correspondence and pursuant to §280-74 of the Southold Town Code, enclosed herewith is MetroPCS New York, LLC check no.: 5402 made payable to the Town of Southold in the sum of$1500.00, to be held in escrow for the technical consultant review fee. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing,please do not hesitate to communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain 'J Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN,_H & COUGHLIN, LLP APA - 92010 By: Lawrence C. ZC LCR:cp Enclosures WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, March 29, 2010 4:00 p.m. Applications - .. Project name Metro PCS (Police Station) SCTM# 1000 75-5-14.1 - ..... .. Location: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic Description: This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises. Status: New ....... Action: Review submission and estimate for RF consultant hired by the Town. ..... Attachments: Staff Report& Estimate ... ........ --- Project name: Southview Preserve SCTM#. 1000- 87 5 21.4, 7, 8, 9, 10 --- - - Location: The property is located on the south side of Main Bayview Road, approximately 900' east of Cedar Drive in Southold. Description: This proposal is to subdivide a 14.54-acre parcel into three lots where Lot 1 equals 44,735 s.f., Lot 2 equals 37,343 s.f. and Lot 3 equals 42,470 s.f., with the remaining 11.53 acres of the property to be preserved as open space. Status: Conditional Preliminary Approval ......... ..... Action: Review Open Space Easement. Attachments: Draft Open Space Easement Discussion: 1. Comprehensive Plan Update- project managers, revised timeline, website updates Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:12 PM To: larry Re(E-mail) Subject: Metro PCS police station peconic Hi Larry; I just wanted to let you know that I scheduled the above application for work session this Monday March 29, 2010. I realize that it is a little short notice but, I just got the review estimate from our consultant and we would like to move forward to accept the application and its review. The estimate will be discussed with the Board for approval and a letter will be sent to you for the escrow amount once accepted by the Board. As far as the work session goes, the session will be straight forward to formally accept the application. A general overview will presented to the Board but, the application will not be discussed in great detail until we receive comments back from our consultant and involved/interested agencies. Let me know if this poses a problem for you. i look forward to seeing you or a representative from your office on Monday. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.W inser(a)town.southold.ny.us 1 • • KW f �e Walter A.Cooper �(�0-W o �' Radio Frequency Planning& Consultation 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg,VA 23185 757-220-9442 March 24,2010 % \j \, i Ms. Kristy Winser Senior Planner 5 Town of Southold 2 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 L� via email RE: Town of Southold—MetroPCS at Southold Town Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, SCTM41000-75-5-14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: I have reviewed the material regarding the MetroPCS application. Following are the services I can provide to assist the Town in acting on this application. • Prepare questions and comments to solicit the information required to act on the application. • Review,comment on and verify as necessary, any additional information provided by the applicant, including applicant's calculations and technical (radio frequency related) submissions regarding demonstration of need,proposed coverage,capacity, non-ionizing radiation exposure compliance, equipment and material choices and compliance with FAA hazard/obstruction criteria. • If required, recommend facility design changes to minimize visual or environmental impact or to otherwise comply with Town regulations. • Provide the Town with a report and recommendations regarding the disposition of the application. Any additional tasks will be performed only after your written authorization by e-mail or otherwise. My fee for the above services will be calculated at an hourly rate of$100.00,which will be invoiced monthly. I will also be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses for authorized travel and living costs, express postage,printing and copies. Travel by private vehicle will be reimbursed at the then-current IRS private vehicle rate. Based on my understanding of this application,and assuming it will not be necessary to attend public hearings, I estimate that the total fee will not exceed $ 1,500.00, including expenses. Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold,NY March 24,2010 Page 2 Please note that I am not able to provide a technical evaluation of the structural engineering report submitted with the application. If the Town requires assistance in this area, you should consider engaging the services of a qualified structural engineer If you find this arrangement satisfactory, please provide an e-mail or other written authorization to proceed. Meanwhile, thank you again for requesting this proposal. Very truly yours, / Walter A. Cooper 0 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSP.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR O��pf SOUTyoI Southold, NY 11971 Chair Q OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS co • 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND DONALD J.WILCENSKI lye (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) �'�u Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 16, 2010 Mr. Walter Cooper 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 Re: Proposed Site Plan for MetroPCS at the Southold Town Police Station Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Cooper: Enclosed herewith please find an application package and CD regarding the above- referenced site plan/special exception proposal for your review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. V�e�ry( truly yours, Kristy Winse Senior Planner Encls. 0 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSP.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR o�aOF SO(/jyol Southold, NY 11971 Chair o OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS 4 Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND DONALD J.WILCENSKI ��'. � (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) CO� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 10, 2010 Re', Nielsen, Huber& Coughlin, LLP Aft: Lawrence C. Rd 36 North New York Avenue Huntington NY 11743 Re: Site Plan & Special Exception Application for Metro PCS New York, LLC Located: Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Dear Mr. Re'; The Planning Department is conducting a review for completeness for the above mentioned site plan application received February 25, 2010. The Planning Board, pursuant to §280-74 of the Town Code, has decided to hire a technical consultant to assist in the review of this application. Once an estimate for the cost of consulting services has been determined, a letter will be sent with the amount to be paid by your client. You will then be notified of when the application will be scheduled for a work session after it has been determined that your file is complete. Contact me anytime with questions you may have. Thank you. Sincerer Kristy Winser Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director RE,NIELSEN, HUBER Sc COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEW YORE AvENuE /'w HUNTINGTON, NEW YORE 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FAcSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 GF GOUNSHL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN I February 25, 2010 BY HAND J V Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner FFP, 2. 5 2010 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Annex Building - ----------- 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Plan Application and Special Exception Permit Application for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility at Premises: Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road) Peconic,New York 11958 SCTM#: 1000—75 —5 — 14.1 Dear Ms. Winser: On behalf of MetroPCS New York, LLC (`MetroPCS' hereafter), submitted herewith are the captioned Applications as follows: With respect to the Site Plan Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application; 2. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Affidavit; 3. Original and one (1) copy of Applicant's Transactional Disclosure Form; 4. Original and one (1) copy of Environmental Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated November 20, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(3); 5. Original and one (1) copy of LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, prepared by EBI Consulting; 6. MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4702 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the fee for modification, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74A(2)(a); 7. Seven (7) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report, prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group, dated January 6, 2010, demonstrating the project's compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations and providing information on the other carriers already located on the facility in accordance with Town Town of Southold Planningard • T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Applications February 25, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Code Sections 280-74C(1), 280-74C(6), 280-74B(1)(a) and 280-70J; (Please note that said reports have been revised from those filed with the Building Permit Application for Denial, which were dated July 2, 2009. The enclosed 1/6/10 reports should be referenced and used going forward as they include the total cumulative emissions of all existing, approved and proposed carriers located at the facility); 8. Seven (7) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated December 14, 2009, in accordance with Town Code Sections 280- 74C(1), 280-74C(6), and 280-74B(1)(b); (Please note that said reports have been revised from those filed with the Building Permit Application for Denial, which were dated July 8, 2009. The enclosed 12/14/09 reports should be referenced and used going forward as they include the total structural calculations of all existing, approved and proposed equipment located on the tower. The revised Structural Analysis states the need for foundation reinforcement, and related structural drawings are submitted herewith as item 9); 9. Seven (7) counterparts of Tower Reinforcement Drawings & Specifications, prepared by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated January 29, 2010, in accordance with Structural Analysis Report referenced above; 10. Seven (7) copies of MetroPCS's FCC License pursuant to Town Code Sections 280- 74C(1) and 280-74B(1)(c). 11. Seven (7) counterparts of FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, dated August 26, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(2); 12. Two (2) counterparts of Visual Analysis, prepared by EBI Consulting, dated November 17, 2009, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74C(3); 13. Nine (9) sets of Zoning Drawings, including Site Plan, Vicinity Plan and Elevation Drawings, prepared by MTM Design Group, Inc., dated November 20, 2009, addressing Town Code Sections 280-74C(4), 280-74C(5), 280-74C(9), 280-74C(10), 280-74C(11), 280-74C(12), 280-74C(13) and 280-133A(4); 14. One (1) CD Rom containing digital files of propagation and search ring maps, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-74C(7) and §280-74B(1)(f); 15. Two (2) sets of Photos of Existing Structures pursuant to Town Code Section 280- 74C(8); and 16. Four (4) copies of Property Survey, prepared by John Gallacher, Land Surveyor, dated October 30, 2003, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-133A(5). We also submit seven (7) counterparts of the following items, which are now required under Code Section 280-74B, Building Permit Application requirements, but were not required or submitted at the time the Building Permit Application was submitted for the instant proposal: L Gap and Propagation Maps, pursuant to Code Sections 280-74B(1)(d) and (e); 2. Search Ring Map, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(e); 3. Affidavit of Radiofrequency Engineer, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(e); 4. Copy of Deed, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(g); and 5. Copy of Communications Site Lease Agreement, between MetroPCS and Town of Southold, dated July 9, 2009, pursuant to Code §280-74B(1)(g). Town of Southold Planning card T-Mobile Site Plan/Special Exception Applications February 25, 2010 Page 3 of 3 With regard to the Special Exception Permit Application, enclosed are the following documents: 1. Original and one (1) copy of Town of Southold Planning Board Wireless Facility Special Exception Application; 2. MetroPCS New York, LLC Check No. 4703 in the sum of $1,000.00, which sum represents the Special Exception Application fee, pursuant to Town Code Section 280- 74A(3); 3. Two (2) copies of Building Department Notice of Disapproval, dated September 29, 2009, and Building Permit Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-74D(1)(a); 4. Two (2) copies of Site Plan Application, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-741)(1)(b); 5. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Jeffrey Homire addressing Alternative Sites Considered and Good Faith Effort to colocate on existing towers, pursuant to Town Code Sections 280-741)(1)(c), 280-741)(2), and 280-74D(4); and 6. Original and one (1) copy of Affidavit of Anthony Cillo regarding future co-location, pursuant to Town Code Section 280-741)(2). Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please communicate with the undersigned. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: \, 7 Bailey C. Lkrkih BCL/mk Enclosures MetroPCS New York,LLC 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic y iK Existing Lattice Tower at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic. Base of existing lattice tower and existing equipment shelters. 0 MetroPCS New York, LLC 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic Existing Monopole at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic. MetroPCS New York,LLC 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic 1 � Existing AT&T 1� r �, •^tee' � ' r 6' .• — HiQ ���� � "„►,rs�. equipment Existing j �\ 1, 4'.�1 •�!1� + - T-Mobile equipment / /1 1 � � r ,♦ A W3 ..�.; �„,,,�; •• - �� i ami.. • 1 . .. v- •' � 71 17r r.r_ Lyre �R, .. -A ;, i 4 tii ' . Wdi J ` Add • �.r WI sw � � .f v4 Ilk . 9 elk • A �� �q• rt� I� . .. •. 6FR� -pN Roo y! O T 9momuc y 1'g OGSF J Long Creek t �� l��� Mill Cree Pond O� y ��G 6 B Pond O,QT e�R OZ Oyu / MAIER PL OLi�� O O P rea GO nd � y PNN podrome / A PAZ C�< 0 OeAq Z Town Creek O ZCT Oma? O,r�FR!` ockey Cr . 6 Goldsi th "p0 A GNR\SSOP O ! O '7 .14, ARVIEW „ Duck Pond 'q'907,'-1h'OR/� 4 4/V'PO 9A! 07 West Creek OHO LN O Pg\Na� N BAYVIEW O� O ON 15me o FOS Ro p Corey Cree VP10 QO O BRIOGF Lry t2ichmond G 2 pn\0 P� SPRING LN ,�G Little PeC T�r�N!! Y7314 Southold SQJ�OFo q STF I SAF FOq !N QliyC ANTU LN LI O `9 6 WN i- ¢ z tis �1 Mud reek ST LN am Cr ,�Z- OO z 4Q� m LU x Z OPS N T Town of mebmPCS. Southold Town Boundaries • Subject Site Site ID NY7315A MAP 41405 Route 25 • Proposed Sites Peconic, New York Map Scale: 1" = 0.85 mi Existing Coverage Oct. 23, 2009 Prepared by Nico Balzano �7 lid �.�► � r��'- :'-may of 3 • Qua-u!�� <:,... / vJ n • • J aa y Ira- Wo do . rr. 9- <mm ® s` P "y �A Roo J mp 00Z -� Yqn�� `gyp Lon ee • GE BLV t' Pond I Q� Gp B m p`3� 9[. G mpIER�- 1 Q, pI40 re ndT O PNN p�om FSE �O RD ��( • T • \STpP � NOR Cay O Oa x N t a. •` A TGr N 1 O �O "Po 1// z (ti Ri eek 04 LN P Q n N Town of Town Boundaries metro3CS. Southold " ft,- flew • Subject Site Site ID NY7315A 41405 Route 25 • Proposed Sites MAP 4 Peconic, New York - 95 dBm In Vehicle Proposed Coverage Map Scale: 1"=0.85 mi Oct. 23 , 2009 Prepared by Nico Balzano l 1 NY7315 Search Ring Map K pd Pine Nec Custer Ave CtearvieW q,e Mair(� �\aa�e� ti Peconic Sys 48 A Ln Glenn V N C254033 -72.45534F�a Rq0.300 mLon1„�xland�Oy Laughing Ic Waters Qa \PNe°* y v On 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Copynght0 and(P)1g88-2006 Microsoft Coryomem arM/or its suppliers.All nghts msen id.hgp:/Nmw.mi=asff.coMstmets/ Potions 01g 20061nstallBhieM software Corporation.All rights resened.Certain mapping and direction dela 02W NAWEQ.All nghts reserved.The Data for areas of Canada induces intonation taken w h permission horn Canadian authorities, including'.0 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada,C Queen's Primer for Ontario.NAVfEQ and NAWEQ ON BOARD are trademarks 0 NAVfEQ.0 2005 Tele Atlas North America Inc.All rights reserved.Tele Atlas and Tele Atlas North Amens are trademarks of Tele Atlas,Inc. • MetroPCS New York, LLC 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic ti• ceA •aeY Existing Verizon equipment shelter. Existing Nextel equipment shelter. 0 Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Special Exception& Site Plan application for a Wireless Communication Facility. Preparer: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: September 13, 2010 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: MetroPCS at the Southold Town Police Station S CTMN#: 1000-75-5-14.1 Street Location: 165 Peconic Lane Hamlet: Pcconic Zoning District: R-80 Type of Site Plan: Amended Property Owner: Southold Town Applicant: Metro PCS Agent: Larry Re' Plan Prepared By: MTM Design Group Date of Map: 5/8/09 last revised, 12/17/09 Submission Date: 2/25/10 II. Description of Site Plan Project Colocation of a tow of 6 antennas on an existing 131.5-foot ft lattice tower whereas, the new antenna at 90 feet high will be located below the existing 3 rows of antenna. Call of Meeting: This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix public utility wireless antenna to an existing 131.5 foot lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District. III. Site Analysis SEQRA CLASSIFICATION - Unlisted Action coordinated review • The proposed facility would exceed the maximum height restriction of 45 feet for antenna structures in R-80 zones as prescribed by §280-70I(2). • The existing tower already far exceeds the limit, but the proposed location of the antenna would be at a lower height and would not extend out as far as the existing antenna that would help to reduce visual impact. • The proposed installation would comply with the Town's goal of encouraging co- location. Application for Metro. PCS p.2 IV: Permits and/or Review Required From Other Aeencies • FAA , Shall comply with applicable airport and/or airspace hazard and/or obstruction regulations—submitted • Structural inspection report from Engineer- submitted NEED • Cutchogue Fire District • Building Inspector Certification • Drainage review from Town Engineer • LWRP review for consistency • ARC V: Special Exception Considerations: 1. Construction of proposed facility is a public necessity. 2. The applicant has made substantial effort to co-locate with existing wireless facilities, or has made substantial effort to locate on municipally-owned land or structures, or with in existing structures 3. There are compelling reasons, which make it more feasible to construct the proposed facilities rather than alternatives In addition to the matters to be considered in Article XXV of this Chapter,the Planning Board shall give consideration to the following in issuing a special exception approval for wireless communication facilities: (1) The proposed antenna support structure must be demonstrated to be the lowest height above the ground feasible to achieve the service needs of the carrier (2) The wireless communication facility has been situated to minimize its proximity and visibility to residential structures, residential district boundaries and landmarks designated by Town, federal or state agencies. (3) The wireless communication facility is designed and situated to be compatible with the nature of uses on adjacent and nearby property. (4) The wireless communication facility has been designed to use the surrounding topography to minimize its visual impacts. Application for Metro.PCS p.3 (5) The wireless communication facility has been designed to use the surrounding tree, building or foliage coverage to minimize its visual impacts. (6) The wireless communication facility maximizes design characteristics to reduce or eliminate visual impacts and obtrusiveness. (7) Other adequate conditions have been placed on the wireless communication facility which will minimize any adverse impacts of the facility on adjoining properties. VI. Staff Recommendations - The Planning Department finds the application complete in technical information. The following is for the Boards consideration: ❑ It is recommended for the Planning Board to accept the application for review, and refer the application to involved interested agencies for comment. ❑ It is further recommended for the Board to schedule the Public hearing for the next available date October 18, 2010. VII. Materials to aid in review Aerial view of property Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Special Exception& Site Plan application for a Wireless Communication Facility. Preparer: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: March 29, 2010 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: MetroPCS at the Southold Town Police Station S CTMN#: 1000-75-5-14.1 Street Location: 165 Peconic Lane Hamlet: Peconic Type of Site Plan: Amended Property Owner: Southold Town Applicant: Metro PCS Agent: . Larry Re' Plan Prepared By: MTM Design Group Date of Map: 5/8/09 last revised, 12/17/09 Submission Date: II. Description of Site Plan Project Proposed Construction Type: Colocation of a row of 6 antennas on an existing 131.5 foot ft lattice tower whereas, the new antenna at 90 feet high will be located below the existing 3 rows of antenna. Zoning District: R-80 Call of Meeting: This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of peconic lane in the R-80 zoning district. Status: 02/25/10— Applicant submitted application. 3/10/10- letter sent to applicant that application is currently being reviewed. 3/16/10- application sent to Walter Cooper for an estimate for consulting services. 3/25/10- received estimate and application was scheduled for a work session for 3/29. Application for Metro PCS n 2 III. Site Analysis SEQRA CLASSIFICATION -Unlisted Action coordinated review • The proposed facility would exceed the maximum height restriction of 45 feet for antenna structures in R-80 zones as prescribed by §280-70I(2). • The existing tower already far exceeds the limit,but the proposed location of the antenna would be at a lower height and would not extend out as far as the existing antenna that would help to reduce visual impact. • The proposed installation would comply with the Town's goal of encouraging co- location. IV: Permits and/or Review Required From Other Agencies • Carrier licensed by FCC—Submitted • Power density analysis- Submitted • An independent RF engineer has corroborated to assist in the review of this application. . • Lease agreement- Submitted • Due Diligence Affidavit- Submitted. . • FAA , Shall comply with appUcable airport and/or airspace hazard and/or obstruction regulations— Submitted NEED • Southold Fire District • Building Inspector Certification • Drainage review from Town Engineer • LWRP review for consistency • ARC • Structural inspection report from Engineer V: Special Exception Considerations: 1. Construction of proposed facility is a public necessity. 2. The applicant has made substantial effort to co-locate with existing wireless facilities, or has made substantial effort to locate on municipally-owned land or structures, or with in existing structures 3. There are compelling reasons, which make it more feasible to construct the proposed facilities rather than alternatives A. • 0 Application for Metro, PCS p.3 VI. Staff Recommendations - The Planning Department recommends for the Planning Board to accept the application for review, accept the escrow amount and request that applicant provide the fee amount in order to move forward with the review. Once the applicant has submitted the fee amount, the recommendation is to wait to refer the application to involved/interested agencies until our consultant has provided information to the Board for consideration. It should be noted that clarification and or additional information may be may be necessary to make a determination. VII. Materials to aid in review Aerial view of property, Visual Study, RIFE evaluation, Propagation Maps TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Site Plan Name: NetrOPCS at 165 Peconic Lane, Pee oni(Application Date: Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 75 - 5 __L4.j Other SCTM#s: Street Address: 165 Peconic Lane Hamlet: Peconic Distance to nearest intersection: Type of Site Plan: New x Amended Residential If Amended, last approval date: SECTION B: Owners/Aeent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number or the people below: Property Owner Town of Southold Street 53095 Route 25 City Southold State NY Zip 11971 Home Telephone Other 63LI765-1800- , M Applicant MetroPCS New York, LLC Street 5 Skyline Drive City Hawthorne State NY Zip 10532 Home Telephone Other 914-543"=8500 Applicant's Agent or Representative: Attorney for Applicant: Contact Person(s)* R8, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP Street 36 North New York Avenue City Huntington State NY Zip 11743 Office Telephone 631-425-4100 Other Fax: 631-425-4104 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: New Modification of Existing Structure _Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: 12.27 ac./y4Ax Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 180 mx/sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes_No If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): R-80 Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 09 /29 / 09 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No x If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: Police station and public utility wireless telecommunications facility List all proposed property uses: Same as existing Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: 5.9 % Proposed lot coverage: 5.93 % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): 33,650 sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): Parking Space Data: N/A #of existing spaces: #of proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Yes No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 2.55 %o Proposed landscape coverage: 2.55 % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500' of a wetland area? Yes No X If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify th all th information is true. Met OPCS w rk C — Signature of Preparer: By: Date: etti Page 3 of 3 NY VP/GM J - _ 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD WIRELESS FACILITY SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION Application Name (use same name as Site Plan Application Name): MetroPCS at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic Application Date: february / /2010 Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000 - 75 5 14.1 Other SCTM#'s: Street Address: 165 Peconic Lane Hamlet: Peconic Checklist of application materials required to be submitted (see Special Exception Application Requirements Handout or §280-74 D. of the Southold Town Code for details) V/One copy of the building permit application materials /Complete site plan application submission //One copy of the deed or lease agreement for the use of the property v/Analysis of site location alternatives , Effort to co-locate documentation (if this is not a co-location) /Propagation maps showing existing facilities and service in the town ✓/PEvidence supporting existence of inadequate service _Special Exception Application Fee form updated 5/4/2009 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: September 29, 2009 TO: Town of Southold C/O Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Ave. Huntington, NY 11743 Please take notice that your application dated September 1, 2009 For permit to construct co-location wireless telecommunications facility: Location of property: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is a permitted use on this 12.10 acre lot located in the R-80 Residential zone. Pursuant to Section 280-70(E) the proposed use requires a special exception and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board LD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ATION C HECKLI ST B isIIIi, ING DEPARTMENT o Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey, www. northfork.iiet/Southold/ PERMIT NO.— Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Examined 20 l 1 L, „I ontact: Approved . 20— I Mail to: Disapproved a/c BIDG. DEPT. TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Phone: Expiration 20_ Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date 20 INSTRUCTIONS • a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans,accurate plot.plan to scale.Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval,of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,building code,h code, and regulations,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. Me OPCS LLC Q$t101(11@tt( y: NY (Sighature o applicant or name,if a corporation) I 5 Sjtkline Drive, Hawthorne; NY 10532 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect,engineer, general contractor, electrician,plumber or builder Lessee Name of owner of premises Town of Southold (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. . N/A Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. N/A 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: Town of Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY House Number St(eet Hamlet Isfat�;ii.i rlt, . County Tax MiOXC*0661ISection 75 Block 5 Lot 14.1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot (Name) 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Police station and public utility wireless telecommuhfCatiolm facility b. Intended use and occupancy Public utility wireless telecommunications facility 3. Nature of work(check which applicable):New Building Addition Alteration RRe air Removal Demol'tio O ezW r Affix publIc utility wireless teleotnn antednna3exstdin� �it�� �nsh�a equipmen on 'he grown , :,as epic e i e p ans su mi a erewi (Description) 4. Estimated Cost I (,S 000.00 Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height. Number of Stories *Existing 1311-G!11&tticootiewer existing whip antennas to 145' ) Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories * 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories *Proposed equipment within a 121x15' fenced compound. 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth William M. Beebe, Robert D. Boyd 10. Date of Purchase 7/11/1968 Name of Former Owner R Robert E. Rehm 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated R-80 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation? YES_NOS_ 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES—NO X Will excess fill beremovedfrom premises?YES—NO X 14.Names of Owner of premises Town of Southold AddressSouthol�t,tRY211971phone No. 631=765-1800 Name of Architect MTM Design Group Inc. Address .0. Box 3 etl;honeNo 732-888-6210 Name of Contractor Address ' Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO X * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this properly within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO X * I*li `16XMERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. k10\qV YVI 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. if elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenant anaa esttii ttiion with respect to this property?* YES_ NO X STATE OF NEW YORK) SIF YE , PlO�IDE sA COPY SS: COUNTY OF�� 2J Iv ,�)� o I rn Ltfi being duly sworn, deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract)above named, (S)He is the Lessee (Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly author izcd to perforin ui lluve performed the said work and to inake and file this appicaiion, that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief,and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this day of /'�l 2001 Metro S New LLC U4_t "�Ct,lt.2a By: Notary Public !��/��na re of Applicant DIANE L tate Of Vl DW OlMettl NOTARY PUBLIC,State Of New York Noin Westchester NY VP/GM Qualified in Westchester Coun Commission Exp! es July 19,20" FORM NO. 3 1 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL r DATE: September 29, 2009 TO: Town of Southold CIO Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP 36 North New York Ave. Huntington, NY 11743 Please take notice that your application dated September 1, 2009 For permit to construct co-location wireless telecommunications facility: Location of property: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is a permitted use on this 12.10 acre lot located in the R-80 Residential zone. Pursuant to Section 280-70(E), the proposed use requires a special exception and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. u CC: file, Planning Board f * Federal Aviation Adtistration Aeronautical Study No. Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2009-AEA-2370-OE 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 Issued Date: 08/26/2009 Marc Harris HPC Development, LLC 52 Garden Ave. Wharton,NJ 07885 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations,part 77, concerning: Structure: Antenna'- Side Mount NY7315 Location: Peconic,NY Latitude: 41-02-29.00N NAD 83 Longitude: 72-27-30.87W Heights: 132 feet above ground level (AGL) 148 feet above mean sea level(AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are)met: Based on this evaluation,marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis,we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates ,heights, frequency(ies)and power. Any changes in coordinates ,heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,power,or the addition of other transmitters,requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes,derricks, etc.,which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However,this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law,ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State,or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. Page 1 of 3 of further assistance,•ase contact our office at(718) 553-454•n any future correspondence g this matter,please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2009-AEA-2370-OE. ature Control No: 644345-118052324 (DNE) {afie Venticinque Specialist Attachments) Frequency Data Page 2 of 3 • FRuency Data for ASN 2009-AEA-2370 LOW HIGH FREQUENCY ERP FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP UNIT 806 824 MHz 500 W 824 849 MHz 500 W 851 866 MHz 500 W 869 894 MHz 500 W 896 901 MHz 500 W 901 902 MHz 7 W 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W 932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW 935 940 MHz 1000 W 940 941 MHz 3500 W 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W 2305 2310 MHz 2000 W 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W 1730 1740 MHz 61 dBm 2130 2140 MHz 61 dBm Page 3 of 3 'ip81. .�.�lIe.11.Ie.ei 611.1lty BLT I.[.A..I l.1,I8i 1 • eMs(.' Ii�iB I:[. , 88 i:441'3u#a.. .... . +""kY Y� e`m h'9`M06 File Edit View Toolbar window Helq u 75.-5-14.1 473009 Southold Active 91S 7 School Southold Schou z, Towrr of Southold Rd Year. 2070 Next Yr Government Land AV. 0,100 165 Peconic Ln Land Size 12.10 acres Total AV 63,200 L= L_C ParCe175a5•14.1 Owner Tax Bit Mailing Address 3rd Patty Address Blahk .� L:3 Histoty .C1 i ifn ;ml AsseTown of Southold Ownei Type: Prim Status: ssment t mph 1 oxo s _C;i SpecDist[ 3 Desrxin Ctler�oJ dame rt.lMotil b. : Fitsf Nab' t M f: : Jr Sr-,etc: 3 .Cis own of Sortlrgld LW She[fl tom Attontion To&I Care Lit: A t f Street No. P 'x D►' 0 1.Rural)�itiuta, St t 5: Urti Unit Na 53095 Po Box No: C': JTcwn: Stake Comity enter if tTet"USA' Bar ;: Owro :e g lfel lam; +Dw t Ty e Y SEart BgMon A [24'x BOJ J1 jt RPS Version 4-[Own... ,_. aP� 'FeGral Communications ComnSion Page 1 of 2 �gt� Wireless Telecommunications Bureau93 �Y Radio Station Authorization LICENSEE NAME: MetroPCS AWS, LLC FCC Registration Number(FRN) MARK A. STACHIW 0015005598 METROPCS AWS, LLC 8144 WALNUT HI-LL LANE, SUITE 800 Call Sign File Number DALLAS TX 75231 WOGA731 0002773870 Radio Service AW - AWS, 1710-1755/2110-2155 MHz lianas Grant Date Effeetive Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-29-2006 11-29-2006 11-29-2021 1-1-30-2006 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator REA001 0 O Market Name: Northeast i 1stBURd-out Date= 2nd Build-out Date. 3rd Build-out Date 4th Build-out Date SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS This authorization is conditioned Upon the licensee, prior to initiating operations. from any base or fixed station, making reasonable efforts to coordinate frequency usage with known co-channel and adjacent channel incumbent federal USers opera-ting in the 1740-1-755 MHz band whose faoilities COUld be affected by the proposed operations. See, 9'..g. , FCC and NTIA. Coordination Procedures in the 1710-1755 MHz Banc, Public Notice, FCC 06-50, WTS- DOGKet No, 02-353, rel . April 20, 2006,. AWS operations must not Cause harmful interference across the Canadian or Mexican Border. The ("Specizl Conditions or Waivers/condition*" continued on next page . . .) Conditions: Pursuant:to Section'309(h)of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 309(h), this license it subject to the following conditions:This license stroll not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station not any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Ne)Mter the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communiaatiens Act of 1934, as amended, See 47 U.S:C. Section 310(d). This license Is subject In terms to the right of use or control conferred by ,action 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 ll SSection 606. To view the geographic areas associated with the license, go to the Universal Licensing System(ULS) homepage at http://wireless.fac,gov/uts and select"License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. PCC 60 (WB February 200E Ii. F f' Page 2 of 2 Me: MetroPCS AWS, LLC Call Sign File Number Print Date WQGA73:1. 0002773870 11-3Q-2006 Special Conditions or Waivers/Conditions autnority granted herein is subject to :future international agreements with Canada or McX,f Co, as apPlicable. FCC 601 -MB SeTm Z-&p I I coc aw � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET j (� VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT O U'fbo 1 Pe C,m cC, 1-ki pe ctm t c 151 a ACR. 12 J 2. I O REMARKS o - l ToWe,< IncteovsQtssess 4eLt a TYPE OF BLD. t f 31-1109 onstruci wonjmj s PROP. CLASS SO LAND IMP. TOTALDATE 27 c) SZ oo 020 31 ( log 55 C� Co32-ar> 3 I 0 FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT BULKHEAD TOTAL ■■■■■■■■■■■�IR?T'�*■Illy■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■TTMLEMES■■■■L�:yl11■■■■■ k ■■■07■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■hMT Tl ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11!�!'R.."''fli■■■■■ ■■■I[,�i■■■l1�1�9w■■■■■■■■11■■■■■ ■■■■■■■11■■■■■Vi.'IL■Iliiiililil�iiiii Interior Finish JM= ■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■lien■■!■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ • MINE • NOMME NINE MEN 0 T ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■LININ■■■■■�.. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■E�■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■moil WIN■MAN ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■mom MEMO, ■■■■��I■C^■I�i���■C77 ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ^ MEMO ONE 1' r NOON IN NINE ■■■MSS MEI■■■■■■■■■■■■r�lll MEN■■■■11■■■■■vi.9L''■■■■NEW ■■■■■■■IIf3■■■■■■■■i�aiiil ■■■■■■■II■■■!!"'�■■�lII■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■IC■■■ �■■:,■■■■■■ RM iT LD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDINNG DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey www. northfork.net/Southold/ PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form // N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Examined 120_ ( I 1 L. „i ontact: Approved . 20_ lJ�.I 7 Mail to: Disapproved a/c BLD[,. DEPT. TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Phone: Expiration 20_ Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date 20 INSTRUCTIONS , a.This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot.plan to scale.Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval,of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. E Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing,the extension of the permit for an Addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,building code,h code,and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. MeoPCS LLC Win 011TIM By: ' (1h/ VPIGM- (Sigiature'of applicant or name,if a corporation) l 5 Syyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician,plumber or builder Lessee Name of owner of premises Town of Southold (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. . N/A Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. N/A. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: Town of Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY House Number Street Hamlet 3lf9ffill_i itE;i County Tax MMW1 AISection 75 Block 5 Lot 14.1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot (Name) 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Police station and public utility wireless telecommutifcatilons facility b. Intended use and occupancy Public utility wireless telecommunications facility 3. Nature of work(check which applicable):New Building Addition Alteration Mair Removal tDtpmqolii'ti Ot et W r Affix public utility wireless equipmen on he grounednnas epic edlnn t� pans su mint�ednUrew (Description) 4. Estimated Cost ) (,S,000•p0 Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front* Rear Depth Height Number of Stories *Existing 131'-611&tti•ce,'Aewer (existing whip antennas to 1451 ) Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front* Rear Depth Height Number of Stories *Proposed equipment within a 12'x15' fenced compound. 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth William M. Beebe, Robert D. Boyd 10. Date of Purchase 7/11/1968 Name of Former Owner & Robert E. Rehm 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated R-80 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation? YES_NO x 13. Will lot be re-graded?YES_NO X Will excess fill beremovedfrom premises?YES—NO X 14.Names of Owner of premises Town of Southold Addresssoutfiol OutRY211971Phone No. 631-765-1800 Name of Architect MTM Design Group Inc. —Address P, •0•,Box 3, Iil l'a honeNo732-888-6210 Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO X * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this propea within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO X * IE1w0i.Llt4ERMITS MAYBE REQUIRED. Y j0r,cllj V 16. Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenant andd estt ttiin iitthh respect to thisproperty?* YES NO X STATE OF NEW YORK) SIF YE PI �cVID sA �GOPY p SS: COUNTY OF�k- �Gl„n o being duly sworn, deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named, (S)He is the Lessee (Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have perforilled uie said work Bpd to inakc and file this application,' that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn tobefore me this Iqday of /17 2001 Metro S New e, LLC UtMs a'-a. By: Notary Public i ��na re of Applicant NOTARY PUBuc,�s at eOf New York V [stn 01MOtti No. OtLA6 nester W VP�QM Qualified In Westchester Coun Commission Exp;res July 19, 20" SURVEY OP' PROPER?'' Sq(: rU9l?'E 11T SOUT7f= ?'0'WNIO(F SOTUT9 OLD NOW 01 F00.MEP1� 539.76' SrUP'P'OLTK CO�UN( -Y, TTEW YOR.7C TOWN OF SOtI'1H0 ryas uv arx 6 SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 w 8 0 20"E AREA-534,371 SQ FT •z eWLDING 15,1•souTH N46 42 y 12.27 ACRES t7.1'EAST TOWP'R tS N L�q Sul too 173' N LINXPEN 80LC1H voR [1e/0 O K •r6tm 15.1'SOUTH rn'm. W ■ .CONCRETE MONUMENT}VICINE W aux urz _ mn mw+�"}p1O u iD.es Tu°o` O " °` F em M 0 100' urwr ,rvtm eorz e us 'i`r'x6a eexuArw _ Y O ' °CMelA6t Olae'° W I I••. Q O yYPYtt ITIM! r$7 C� —, I • I umm I eme6rd NOW OR FORMERLY ELAINE XOMNOS i 11.11 STEVEN 5 XANOS I 0106 `ca OW OR FO °0' O Now ASPHALT DANE 1 O y F1AIM.LATHAEt Dx�DY i ` rw i'1walPR"', m = p' a j'°' I mxtun6l C,,,E 45.1 N55056'00"E 256.09, sa.1' + S I ovuxuD 1 msaru u•w 18. ' qp gg I WEE !l1Cl fl6!I Dw �.e• h I urMrr 6 ffFF ierurw•wxunlwDixc ^max urr W toa � ' O 46.6' 4Na. ..i\ 1 I �� DvEE, A / i. , ,is FO n 1 1 L�� I( / 1.1.4• � lxeD n.r wT g ,xmt wt x660 \ — C �'-'I pAY'l,.r enet _ CONCRETE O xxxrs "-- e,wma!! 13.3' O imam Awa % "N1 _ ��y , xe•e IY RNO •• wxan! `"'"•Yeraa`"'¢'N P N., W m+serwr ° °"lAOe e6r• — .. Trn 'e ASPHALTEM a J ra6wnxtrea! IL llDc / eM I \ DRIVE — I °''` 344.84' GnyrL 5�3� »: 11.7• tit.. t¢eu 1 y r a �' ti N IuouN! � Mu artuate I LAE S48°4p�0 W p 2 owns D,ull.e' ,D} 56.1' W m+ lwa..an 0xW m.r H N O• D.sx tM S48 04' . O Ixxuanl Q I I W I a� � � � ae6 wLLL 1SZ.S4 7w pptow SOMUV-0 i w�x.lr ! ASPHALT i O I g N �g \ Lx• r.rO :T 90 I to66VK$• `meq www ` DRIVE 1 Pn I o pp !.. o I reo 1 NOWORRIRMF•RLY p unur* r„r xOr !R l itow�ropMERLY ` Cf1AAlE3 BLAMA 3 JOANNM.aTHOMASJ I I \� 'p ONOw 00.NE.MNUY 1 59.9'1 PLRRY ap6E0.T eCMRO®Efi r84.85' N G g yq I ( N too V l i I I o 548039'50'W a�"w I w a) 0 81.64' rcu I S48040'00"W 177.84' ROAD MAIN S. IZ. 25 ) uxumxx,RDlareuraxexuxxwxrorw warvev 'rN. -; � n Awtt.,ax oe atTOx f,p a xM Ydn arlri uw. ' tarx:eorm xumr Mwxoreruiw MUxDe"aVlYD6e lw:to eweaausw.avu wrR ww"e®roee 'l � W \� AVHIDZPV.OLLWMIFODIIGH1TrIG1KNl4YDIG.IEDxEAM1 VV MMLr1AYfMLr}OMelgD11{q{wpyM NMEV I6AVMl0 .V�•'ela XI!llxKrfOMrTe e°xrMf/.pVICMPFMµ.peNCV Or M 1flwN°wlrllYlpx a W MMR!M RgTT'ixaI.TOH!M! JOHN GALLACHER QrlM.w°u°xa'w Nnrrn-ue rae inamxs N6 x°r awuxreeDumiaeweuMAaleraucNxR LAND SURVEYOR iewwe°ox RDuewrauMxr®uxlRlrxrwtuty •aDRrwMrwlrlArrxcra�arxlwmelrxlerrser 58 FLORENCE DRIVE uulwrox c,nvm r*la+.xox m!arAcruue m M wxcru,rr vara A.ferncwweluwue,MmwxRxm MANORVILLE, N.Y. 11949 RD`Dwane exxmaxoxseeu,xaruxwwau emu,Mn°e rwmxD ueAa xmmowroeuwx6e lxloMa c°xenurnai wturrvaaxieuweraroraaerexRaa (631 ) 874-0400 SURVEYED: OCTOBER 30 ,2003 xexauMwn a wenxn ea wxup wnv.vrecrwc rwe ra°relrv.rx!wurxxe n Meer,oes a xwms.ar.wAv w MSCOAVA�G"Y,xWINNERE��YICTIRMM Ml1VMlxR FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date:/ // / 09 lam. Date Sent: _/ Project Name: Nem 9L A 6koq O-y4, �(— Project Address: VOS 1''.-2.e- nr C-' L"L Qx-b tc , Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000--21---- - Zoning District: I���'t� Request: Co (Occ� o� of �uL,l�c u� ltr tfeleSS orh,t� .� 'r ��ion nn Nnttinicfp / ! u — e) wnecL lair/. (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: -�—7/ 1.5 a 42gfn1, /-leA' us tin 2 dW 7_vr)e Initial Detertnination as to whether site plan is required:,S a&- p n a- -ClaeL a n"cV-k/jm roa,d Pe-- a o -7v (E Signature of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / / Date of Comment: / / / Comments: P �� T��/ 6 al 1 2009 4" Signature of PI mg Dept.-Staff reviewer Final Determination Date: Decision: SCTM # 6-1--p 1 1 ccc .900 1 cl qo I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET j VILLAGE DISTF SUB. LOT own of ou a1 PecmLoi c( cc 5 ACR. G I O REMARKS i p - l To�/Ve ,- I rtcrea sQ s ytsSPss Jia l ua TYPE OF BLD. I 31-11D9 onstruct ravvaniml s PROP. CLASS 5 0 LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE OU SZ I oo OZoo 41 ' all cog o FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT BULKHEAD TOTAL d . ■■■■■■■■■■■■1R?a�t-'■1111!■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■L.■■■11■■■i■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■ ■■■i■cam■■■■IY■■C�1�;�■■■�wl�11■■■■■ ■■■■■■■11■■■■■Ji�L''■iiiii■i■i®iiiiii ■■■■■■■1113■■■■■■■■■■■■�11■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ FULL ®� . . .4 MEN■!■■!■■!!■■■®!®®■!!®■' ■■■■■■■■■■■■I��'t'■IRI■■■!■■■ ME ■■■I�C��■■rlYli■L�ly�E■■�1w�11 ■MMI��.�il■■■■■■ROME■■■• 111 ■■■■■■■11■■■■■vi.�i:■E■■MON MEI1� ■MMMMMMII■ME■■■EMI!----- ■E■EMMMEEMM■ iiiiiiiiiiisiiiiiMENNENiiii SURVEY OP PROPERTY Sg"T'rU7{rI�E .1 SOu?J9-IOLD `I`0T SOUTMOLD NOW ow FO0-, YY 539.7b' SUTTOLK CO` `74T 'Y, TI YORX gOWN OF aoLLIH01D Fwe AIM K SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 xU' AREA=534,371 SO FT 3uTH N4°W1AI"G 12.27 ACRES • 6°422 LollIs •so 17.t' BILLIAWO. 1tO S� , N ONKN nczp IS•2'60uTH IA.w. 0 ■ .CONORCFB MON FNT FOUND � yEc. coww"la G, aua urs fwW 1116 L.Y X' Islay 0 100' ufltm afacm fon Imc. cDaRAlm vo IPZIP W110f^ mxa+lt iiapaWm ° tov aw pEo. W r lJ �F unurc A • fW IKK frAxe nBe NOW 00.FORMERLY MAMKOWNOS MARRA 11.1'1 STEM TbOKAN08 sTEYEH soxbxos M mN(.Bn ROPAC[ 4iplfY �\ O u.v 3Aa I eunxa we V eNeuKspp 1 r ieFv'-30.6 .1' OW OK FORMERLY uEun ASPHALT ORNN E II y o"0 V ow WE.V.171A:.t ♦ ; N550 56'00"E 256.09' 58.2' G I ^W+wAE 1 Sonar BAl.1.w 18. ' I wall � Sun aml wy ECO ^•M' � IIIYIIY 61' n.r MN ..i' .J I fIXF � IfIRY MAfENARY 11llW✓(L •WIHgA <7j� Nq 56.8' •ar •• \� l � ���`` —�xAm I w iu• D ' woaER wL `` a 1 14.1' -0 mlLl wr It 0N°w \ OONLFETE O fluefa'wr �--_ TMI M uam ==" mxaanew ^ wa no 43.3' N \ nnwa0fxm ^^ wine r,^y;g- p O ^^ar MxB 11NO" B uwB B � ^i^^^^ ^^ mwxaR �'RroR�@ P ?� N woxrwr f6r / ' MAW ASPHALT ^^^^^^^ aAwuxzene I13 R // B°a 53' M.T 31.7' aRlve I erB 384 FAE'°L1°II \ Ac.'x waun a 548°40 ().wp Z� °,ryf>� aux GA9.19 N fA f W m' wFwun ..a 8 04'30BW 0.3'N • bxnAial7Ila0K Rr IV W I 5p� OilIgo Aa f y py 54 152.84 Y fni Ex FZ- I..uruzr I ASPHALT 1 p I g p N eyt5g� C \ x®i.vw PO ¢SJya I p��WRT08ffbW ntw wa y,.� Ne"1tl0 1 DRIVE I t° NOW OF,PORMEN'Y S: . O p G }ypp w• 0 I I 4 wfl�' I1 NAIl` l i NOW°"ORIAl"1/SJ.I CHARLEa BVAIA I r B,,,In �,G 6' l o+� 30 ANN M. I `°\� �'ONOq a0.FORMPRLY� 59.9'I I I rTx aOBB0.7 BCRRO®� 1 E I I I 184.85' I I H e.re on'x 14S48°39'50BW a.r+ I i l o rex I S48040'00"W 177.84' ROAD MAIN ` g R. 25 ) 11I1W1xM�0 NIWTMM1f nW mrxoelmn •„- '1 f x eAVp/.nJlnaaChOXfw MNMT°xtRMUe. N Ye l dWMMMY wNEIKNyMMUKBIxPl1p1 Kam KN°IWKKm BwewEllErKCaxlwalrEK ,f� ®5i{{y•� '�v AVILmCT'.ELLVYMFLAICOIf11Ia\dBxYNAIWIWW ��{ �raL� �, pxlLxaxpLYAMNNKIM rn1E11M NMrI,MiNVE Alaw wwxwmM rmxcawua.oewxlanfrrAKxc uOLMExm N1f111111EN IVINMFPWN.NpAMMgKO n M KKIIIU KBIIMM]N anrlvBwp MABRTaM11K'1 AN JOHN GALLACHER aKaN.womaxaxu ams roAlm xeu ICbriOxaM xflr Enwwec nEiaewrtl' BiaBrxraicuir vnKNoxMMfppif ArMnaKmxlmT•.MErP{r LAND SURVEYOR 59 FLORENCE DRIVE iMANIa11AKanIaxVWRMIEIIn MIOtDKAKxaf MANORVILLE, N.Y. 11949 KE rE mane weef lEx n wan,artAKKVKiA. NEII.MlxM.1 VM W a 4 V N,1Mm W A Nx1EIxK Ym AE1K EOKIIIutT W.MO ENIeIJ.RxI la eKEN lE of nlaaMY M xaxfKBwlEavwBxmaYwlBMmuwrNlnrxEM f SURVEYED: OCTOBER 30 2003 (631 ) 874-0400 MEwnr.Mwunwowerm+anewmwrwAra I�m mea 11nLLaK��YefOfKnMMlIaW1f1 Federal Aviation Alinistration • Aeronautical Study No. Air Traffic Airspace Branch,ASW-520 2009-AEA-2370-OE ` 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth,TX 76137-0520 Issued Date: 08/26/2009 Marc Hams HPC Development,LLC 52 Garden Ave. Wharton,NJ 07885 ** DETERNHNATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations,part 77, concerning: Structure: Antenna- Side Mount NY7315 Location: Peconic,NY Latitude: 41-02-29.00N NAD 83 Longitude: 72-27-30.87W Heights: 132 feet above ground level(AGL) 148 feet above mean sea level(AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are)met: Based on this evaluation,marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis,we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates,heights, frequency(ies)and power. Any changes in coordinates ,heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,power,or the addition of other transmitters,requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes,derricks,etc.,which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However,this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State,or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. Page 1 of 3 If we can be of further assists" please contact our office at(718) 553-0. On any future correspondence concerning this matter,please re er to Aeronautical Study Number 2009-AEA-2370-OE. Signature Control No: 644345-118052324 (DNE) Katie Venticinque Specialist Attachment(s) Frequency Data Page 2 of 3 •equeucy Data for ASN 2009-AEA-23*E LOW HIGH FREQUENCY ERP FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP UNIT 806 824 MHz 500 W 824 849 MHz 500 W 851 866 MHz 500 W 869 894 MHz 500 W 896 901 MHz 500 W 901 902 MHz 7 W 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W 932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW 935 940 MHz 1000 W 940 941 MHz 3500 W 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W 2305 2310 MHz 2000 W 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W 1730 1740 MHz 61 dBm 2130 2140 MHz 61 dBm Page 3 of 3 QiAMi/N'' . e i fireless eral Communications Comofsion Page 1 of 2 �" � Telecommunications Bureau 93 A ..y Radio Station Authorization LICENSEE NAME: Met^OPCS AWS, LLC FCC Registration Number(FRN) NARK A. STACHIW 0015005598 NETROPCS AWS, LLC _- 3144 WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 800 CGII Sign File Number DALLAS TX 75231 WOGA731 0002773870 Radio Service AW - AWS. 1710-1755/29iO-2155 MHz bands Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-29-2006 11-29-2006 11-29-2021 11-30-2006 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Markat Designator REA001 D 0 Market Name: Northeast 1st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date 3rd Buildout Date 4th Build-out Date SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS This authorization is conditioned upon the licensee, prior to initiating operations from any base or fixed station, making reasonable efforts to coordinate frequency usage with known co-channel and adjacent channel incumbent federal users operating in the 1910-1755 MHz band whose facilities could. be affected by the proposed operations. See, e.g. , FCC and NTIA. Coordination Procedures in the 1710-1755 MHz Bane, Public Notice, FCC 06-50, WTS Docket No. 02-353, rel . April 20, 2006. AWS operations must not cause harmful interference across the Canadian or Mexican Border. The ( "Special Conditions or Waivers/Conditions" continued on next page . . .) Conditions: Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communications Act of 1434,as amended, 47 U.S.C, Section 309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions:This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the form thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license not the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. Section 310(d). This license Is subject In terms to the right of use or control conferred by ',action 706 of the Communications Act o f 1934 as amended. See 47 Section 606. To view the geographic areas associated with the license,go to the Universal Licensing System(ULS) homepage at htfp:i/wirelois.fco.gov/uls and select"License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. f•O:; ��, L^,n Febr�rary 200,. . • Page 2 of 2 LtCensee Name: MetroPCS AWS, LLC Call Sign File Number Print Date WQGA731 0002773870 11-30-2006 Special Conditions or Waivers/Conditions authority granted herein is subject to Suture international agreements With Canada or Mexico, as applicable. FCC 601 •M8 TOWN OF,SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey www. northfork.net/Southold/ PERMIT NO. Check Se tic Form n1S p JJ _ ------ N.Y.S.D.E.C. I Trustees Examined .20 ��1' ,,, � ontact: Approved . 20_ LI•� J Mail to: Disapproved a/c l BLOG. DEPT. TOWN OFSOUTHOLD I Phone: Expiration 20 Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date 20 INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale.Fee according to schedule, b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval,of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances, building code,h code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. Met oPCS LLC Dan 01MOtU By: , NY YPIGM (sigiiatureof applicant or name,if a corporation) 1, 5 S,Vyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician,plumber or builder Lessee Name of owner of premises Town of Southold (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. . N/A Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. N/A. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: Town of Southold Police Station, 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY House Number Street Hamlet i.',taiif;ir ) Iltil County Tax MW.'W6,19ection 75 Block 5 Lot 14.1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot (Name) 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Police station and public utility wireless telecommuhecations fact Tim b. Intended use and occupancy Public utility wireless telecommunications facility 3. Nature of work (check which applicable):New Building Addition Alteration Re air Removal tDpmol'tio O et1W rk�7Affff ii lx public utility wireless tuwe equipmen on he groundnnas epic efdtnt� �ie Dye ans su miegnfi�erewitfi.a (Description) 4. Estimated Cost - 6S,Oo0.00 Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories *Existing 131'-611att ice',tewer existing whip antennas to 145' ) Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories * 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories *Proposed equipment within a 12'x15' fenced compound. 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth William M. Beebe, Robert D. Boyd 10. Date of Purchase 7/11/1968 Name of Former Owner & Robert E. Rehm 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated R-80 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES_NO--X- 13. OS13. Will lot be re-graded?YES_NO X Will excess fill beremovedfrom premises? YES_NO X 14.Names of Owner of premises Town of Southold Addresssouthol sutRY211971phone No. 631-765-1800 Name of Architect MTM Design Group Inc. —Address P•O.,Box 3,, jX8.j ;honeNo732-888-6210 Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO X * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this ropeR within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO X * IIFlW91%.)?�[[. ''PERMITS MAYBE REQUIRED. .qct YV 16. Provide survey, to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenant ndd gest iicttii n iitthh respect to this property?* YES NO X STATE OF NEW YORK) I YES, PkOVID e �GOPY SS: COUNTY OFz( /v 'Z t)" U I r a- - being duly sworn,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named, (S)He is the Lessee (Contractor,Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and 15 duly authGriZcu to perform,or iia'vc pEl'furillcd uie said wGlk and to inakc and file this application, that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this 11141 day of / h" 2001 � Metro S New , LLC U141 Cc.� al By: Notary Public (�/f/��a re of Applicant DIANE PUBLIC, No.01LASttpf New York V Dan 01mettl 6027870 Qualified In Westchester County W VP/QM commission E*,es July 19,20 f • • PLANNING BOARD : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC, For Special Exception Permit Approval to affix public utility AFFIDAVIT OF GOOD wireless telecommunications antennas to an existing lattice FAITH EFFORT AND tower and install related equipment at the premises ("Premises"): SITE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 165 Peconic Lane PURSUANT TO TOWN Peconic, New York CODE SECTIONS 280- 1000-075.00-05.00-014.001 741)(1)(c) and 280-74D(2) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS.: --- -� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK JEFFREY HOMIRE, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a Site Acquisition Consultant representing MetroPCS New York, LLC ("MetroPCS") in the Long Island market. MetroPCS is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to construct, operate and maintain a personal wireless telecommunications system in Suffolk County and throughout much of the United States. 2. In my capacity as Site Acquisition Consultant, I was tasked with finding a suitable location for a public utility wireless telecommunications facility within a specific area in Southold as defined by MetroPCS' radio frequency engineers. In this instance, MetroPCS provided me with a search ring map depicting a specific area in Peconic. A copy of the search ring provided by MetroPCS has been attached hereto (please see Exhibit A). 3. In keeping with the purpose and intent of Chapter 280 of the Code of the Town of Southold, MetroPCS seeks to locate a facility on an existing building or structure. 4. 1 identified two (2) existing towers within the subject search ring. Both existing towers are located at the Premises. 5. I was advised by Carlisle Cochran, Chief of Police, that the existing monopole is not available for use by MetroPCS inasmuch as use of this monopole has been reserved exclusively for the present and future use of the Town of Southold Police Department. Attached please find a copy of an Affidavit prepared by Carlisle Cochran, Chief of Police, confirming same (Exhibit B). 6. AT&T and Verizon maintain existing wireless telecommunications facilities on the existing lattice tower at the Premises. This existing lattice tower is also available for use by MetroPCS. 7. MetroPCS' radio frequency engineer has determined that a facility on the existing lattice tower would be capable of eliminating the coverage gap in the area. 8. The Premises was chosen as the optimal site for which a lease agreement could be secured, while still meeting MetroPCS' radio frequency objectives in the subject search area. Utilizing an existing structure obviates the need to build a new tower in the vicinity of the captioned premises and is consistent with the intent of Chapter 280 of the Town of Southold Code. J FF YHOMIRE Sworn to before me this day of November, 2009. NOTARYPUBETC mm e.L MM Mown r.tlM•MIN of w.me 0.M A1pM22 wom IN Iwo C"" 2 NY7315 Search Ring Map l � Alak pr • j :Pec c _ 48 d , 0.300 m Long Island 2541 5- Laughing adiamC ' e .�',�'c✓�,.f,�x. .,e. . 'age M,, L� 1 r � x + 0 mi 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Copyright O erect(P)1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation anclor he suppliers.All rights resermd.hhp:Msw .rricrosoR.00mlatreety Potions 01g 20051ndall$Neld Software Corporation.All rights reseryCertain eG. mapping anti 0iredlan date 02005 NAWEO.M rights resenaW.The Data for areas of carreGa indu s iMonnation taken with permission from Canadian authorities,induding:0 Her Majesty the Casson in Right of Canstla,0Queens Printer for Ontario.NAVTEO and NAVfEO ON BOARD are trademarks of NAWED.02005 Tele Atlas North America,Inc.All rights reserved.1`81e Atlas and Tele Atlas North America are trademarks of Tele Ades.Inc. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of METROPCS NEW YORK, LLC ("MetroPCS") AFFIDAVIT OF For approval to affix public utility wireless telecommunications RADIO FREQUENCY antennas to an lattice tower and install related equipment at the ENGINEER premises("Premises"): Town of Southold Police Station 165 Peconic Lane Peconic,New York District 1000, Section 75,Block 5,Lot 14.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) CARLISLE COCHRAN,being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a Chief of Police for the Town of Southold Police Department. 2. I submit this Affidavit in support of MetroPCS' Application to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to the existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the Premises. 3. On or before May 20, 2009, I was contacted by MetroPCS regarding use of the existing monopole at the subject premises. 4. I advised MetroPCS that the existing monopole is not available for use by MetroPCS inasmuch as use of this monopole has been reserved exclusively for the present and future use of the Town of Southold Police Department. C SLE COCHRAN Town of Southold, Chief of Police S orn to before me this day of n!/ffF— 2009. XtJ. NOTARY PUBLIC PATRICIA D. OARSIK Notary PubUc,Slats of New York No. 01GA4522513 WuIIBsd In Suffolk CeuntY q� � commiiWon Exphea August 31,4/ U PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------K In the Matter of the Application of METROPCS NEW YORK,LLC., COLOCATION . AFFIDAVIT For approval to install a public utility wireless telecommunications facility at("Premises"): 165 Peconic Lane a Peconic,New York 1000-075.00-05.00-014.001 ------------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK } ) SS.: _ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Anthony Cillo, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am the Construction Manager for MetroPCS New York,LLC C'MetroPCS") and am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances hereinafter set forth. 2. The business address of MetroPCS is 5 Skyline Drive,Hawthorne,New York 10532. 3. I make this affidavit pursuant to Town of Southold Code Sectiona80-741)(2). 4. The subject lattice tower will be capable of accommodating colocation of additional antennas for future users. k tJ J� Anthony Cillo Sworn t be or me this day of 2009. NO Y PUBLIC Victoria Brennan,Esq Notary Public, State of New York No.02BR6072822 Qualified in Npssau County C*%*0rtNotte*ina April 15,2010 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. MetroPCS New York, LLC YOURNAME: By: Dan Olmetti (Last time,fust name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning R Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest.`Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicantlagent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted thii d00� Signature Print Name Form TS 1 Dan Olmetti NY VP/GM r V • APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Dan 01metti being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at c/o 5 Skyline -Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 in the Stats of New York, and that he is the owner of the,above property, or that he is the Vice President & General of the LeseeeAvplicant MetroPC3 LQera_Ynrk, LLC (Title) an (specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly f=iled plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and.as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the flllhg of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the / plans submitted, as approved;will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Boa nd that the ctual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance With the plans sub d. Signed MetroPCS New York, LLC Signed By: namnnjt (Partner or Cor Off]gefM tie) Sworn to me this ISS` day of CG!„ h� 02009. . (Notary Public) DIANE LAVELLE NOTARY PUB!.IC, State Of New York No.O1LA6027870 OUP!ifled In Westchester County Commission Expnes July 19,20L3 �' � A•Y -�"����atexe` �F�''#''§` `�'�r. '�� 1, � �' a}��sc'. d �. f � �hx�� .�!L+pM#,s gyp' i'+e"a � f G � ��+t� o"��i✓.'6e si'-� a v'Gy, r � r k xyA. ,� 0t�6 l5 xh a F I rr i •- d y�{o 'Aj5'>S.O�i 1 � perm iemGd erdf�s here(k'�uxf r l di4 � �YtY "11; n,l n t�,e x ' � '* ' �Y a tAm}n5,U14,smiyW+i Igrtr a :�i .s° {� 1'.a�,1vf7n, �r ;>' x pnk ; sr t}wr d6ldimG ,tt,lM boiiJiii�yyyS r4 �, n�'t rro�l tidt A"ja� ,s 'b 4•<'ti Y S bo d 'k�r3R_3 )Cz1}b7jr aw Mmi +'ra Y >& ° �� s • +. ,� £ v ''Q t30OP C rii o5oi�3.$tl alH"f' �mlThm4��I'21 � pl p.z � / _ a x F rpl ,Z S "��-.� Y3 J'r.>P 3 to a' ,.;�r�'' •} H '` (i r i � i� tt�t �''' �r=��� �i� t'ietP4dene �� a'�s r0 Rfr�e3�i a3x,Atoa-�;c v.k 8 iy ' y Y r, tr trX �+4a ok'Js.2iy8 a n: i "+"$ '1o0ArxII'YSru S r s t s hd b� $rY, e v r a�v� °�, v 3£R� r� tai r��*"ai ��4� -a+ri -�t�.M� � f t��, ��L�i'9�li�:t.{�v��+�✓�t"n`"�arAb a t��?I'�P.,f�1��a;�l,U'S#ibr'> m v� t�¢.,wa-I^s F�Y�'"�`w`� ��c' r 'i ����{ > ��''� ��"`x�'..7}��• � �^ra,� �kY � a � i 't�l�' t; 4 .: Al l�&b� 4rp1�L$> a . ,' y E T �l k6e klw � � �d�.ry.a ref ri `��i1�, lti kf�'fppae mt FO�n�We.��n s 6�j M v •; r i i. �' 4�;v� bl b04d7 a*drd{"GfF1`drpob tl�d lib. MFTi ,F erne duly �+w, 't4�. F 'f 1 J 0ud r ,, u I ',x 'adG/wlucA tieigd khe � tl ri • 'BFM;MF.> sSes 'lllFbwa aeat�b� ,y,� t Yw ,a3usJ at h k drier d�' � 9I•Sid d• '�° "i�fvnehl us mdgonie rel+;rpt Ft w.s� r.•; �V -tlui 4 aHi><sd M aeJK d4 tlr dt Artatlxr if w4 } reb 6� �:: twd uNu he _' d'Yme ihuaq,1q Lle : 41 � ' N Imo( x{hP'Alyd>t •A Yla( Atte � +>: 11un Ei$ � f • Ti'rVi+a •- —ILAl k d.rl I WIINI'Y A FAWN (' �� F7"` RI'F'T d DB 5 1 y. t lOr 'union by eWl-TOI i . 'nw+rJb -' Fd a v I j5t r a I i I r I d s Y,�a'T, ��• r 1000-075.00 • Suffolk County Clerks Office \100 252 80 15.4 12 b. 1 12; SCH.DIST.NO.5 PECONIC 250 23�UA 480s 305s 815.2 2, 150 400 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 408 287 1.3 250 LINEAB 312 100 50 2 15.3 FOR PCL.NO. 141 100 150 110 675 SEE SEC. NO. 3 074-05-015 12J 110 150 11'10 436 310 00 i 80 362 4 MATCH 488 110 1505 i 70 � 80 150 r 539 � 676s 263 6 105 14 113 260 —I i 3B3 370 70 203 r 7�5 262 � 116 (50') i r 84 91 151 91 gb` 166 14.1 67` 2.24A(q) 41. 11VJjB5 TOWN 105 208 419 4\ FOR PCL.NO. 345 140 20811 SEE SEC.NO. 1020 100 181,1 086,01-003.1 976 205 \ 100 12 FOR PCL.NO. 997 120 159 SEE SEC. NO. 17 205 33 086-01-009.1 77300 4-00 . 100 i MATCH LINE ��� MATCH L78 E 2,425,200 �` PLANNING BOARD : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of MetroPCS New York, LLC, For Special Exception Permit Approval to affix public utility AFFIDAVIT OF wireless telecommunications antennas to an existing lattice tower RADIO FREQUENCY and install related equipment at the premises("Premises"): ENGINEER 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic (a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Road,Peconic) District 1000 Section 15, Block 9,Lot 8.1 [MetroPCS Site No.NY 73151 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTYOFU1i:�cuEs 2 ) _i NICHOLAS BALZANO,being duly sworn,deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer for MetroPCS New.Yud1,,..,hLC (hereinafter "MetroPCS"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in MetroPCS wireless telecommunications network and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy these service deficiencies. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. I am fully familiar with MetroPCS' wireless telecommunications network in Suffolk County. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of MetroPCS' application for approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility at the Premises. Pursuant to this application, MetroPCS requests approval to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment on the ground at the base of the tower as depicted in the plans submitted herewith. 3. MetroPCS is considered a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of New York and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to serve the public 0 within Suffolk County and throughout much of the United States. MetroPCS strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage area. 4. MetroPCS is in the process of establishing a wireless telecommunications network throughout Suffolk County. Presently, MetroPCS does not maintain any facilities within the Town of Southold. The proposed facility will allow MetroPCS to provide reliable coverage in the vicinity of the proposed site. Unreliable service can represent an inconvenience to users of MetroPCS' services and can have serious consequences during times of emergency or disaster. 5. In order to understand why the proposed antenna site is needed, it is necessary to understand how MetroPCS' system works from an engineering standpoint. MetroPCS' wireless telecommunications system is designed so that low powered base stations are strategically located at determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. Due to such factors as hills, valleys, trees, buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves,each coverage area or "cell" is irregularly shaped. With sufficient signal strength from each base station, the MetroPCS user can reliably transmit, receive or maintain voice or data connections. The sites are ordinarily engineered to cover a limited area so that an antenna facility will cover only the area surrounding it but will not interfere with other sites in the system. 6. MetroPCS has established design criteria so that its wireless network will provide reliable wireless service to its customers, whether those customers are on the street, in a vehicle, or in a building. Providing reliable service to MetroPCS' customers within vehicles and buildings is critical for MetroPCS to provide the quality of wireless service that customers demand and successfully compete with other wireless providers. 7. To meet customer demands and expectations,MetroPCS strives to provide In-Vehicle (or In-Car) coverage and In-Building coverage. These coverage levels represent the minimum signal strength and reliability of service needed to transmit, receive or maintain a voice or data connection at the mobile handset as the environment changes. 2 8. MetroPCS has reliable In-Vehicle coverage when a customer can place or receive a call within a vehicle successfully across 95% of a site's coverage area. In-Vehicle coverage generally results in unreliable in-building coverage. Since the signal level is stronger closer to the antenna site than further away from the antenna site, there will be some coverage within buildings close to the site. 9. MetroPCS has reliable In-Building Residential coverage when a MetroPCS customer can place or receive a call while in a building that is three stories or less in height successfully across 95% of the site's coverage area. This type of coverage will typically provide reliable coverage over the majority of the cell coverage area; however in some areas, and specifically at the outer geographic boundaries of the cell site's coverage area, coverage will be restricted and will likely lead to customers dissatisfaction if customers try to place or receive a call inside a windowless room, cellars or emergency shelters. 10. MetroPCS has reliable In-Building Commercial overage when a MetroPCS customer can place or receive a call while in a building that is greater than three stories in height successfully across 95% of the site's coverage area. In-Building Commercial coverage is targeted for urban residential centers and business districts with high-rise buildings, and suburban business centers. Coverage issues may still occur in hard to serve locations such as within elevators and parking structures. 11. To provide these levels of coverage, MetroPCS has scientifically determined the strength of the wireless signal ("signal strength") necessary to provide these levels of coverage. Because wireless signals are attenuated (i.e. degraded or partially blocked) by obstructions such as trees, automobile windows, automobile sheet metal, and building materials such as wood, brick and metal, a wireless signal must be of sufficient strength in the ambient environment (i.e. outside with no obstructions)to reliably penetrate into automobiles and buildings. 3 12. Wireless signal strength is measured on a logarithmic power scale referenced to 1 milli-watt of power. Signal strength levels less than 1 milli-watt being negative. The smaller the negative dBm number, the stronger the signal. For example, -75dBm is a stronger signal level than— 85dBm. An ambient signal level of —95dBm would provide reliable In-Vehicle coverage on MetroPCS' system. MetroPCS' system requires an ambient signal level of —85dBm to provide reliable In-Building Residential coverage, and an ambient signal level of—75dBm to provide reliable In-Building Commercial coverage. These signal level requirements provide the basis for MetroPCS' design criteria. 13. MetroPCS' design criteria for wireless facilities serving an area are based upon providing 95% reliable signal over a site's coverage area to ensure reliable service for customers. This standard reflects a business judgment that 100% reliability is an unrealistic goal at this time due to financial,technical and environmental constraints. A 95% level of reliability is consistent with the level of service provided by MetroPCS' competitors and is the standard in the industry. Providing service at this level allows MetroPCS to satisfy customers' demands and compete on an equal footing with competitors serving the market. 14. To achieve the 95% reliable design goal, MetroPCS conducts extensive analysis based upon MetroPCS' technology and the area served. 15. In order to eliminate the service deficiency in a particular area, MetroPCS performs signal propagation studies to determine the height and location of the needed cell site. Based on its studies, MetroPCS determined that an antenna facility would have to be established within a narrowly defined search area in order to remedy the service gap in question. In this case, we determined that the installation of the proposed facility will allow MetroPCS to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 16. The proposed antennas must be affixed at least as high as those depicted on the plans submitted herewith in order to ensure that reliable service can be afforded to MetroPCS users in the 4 vicinity of the site. The location and height of the antennas is determined by some or all of the following factors: availability of existing structures, willingness of property owners to enter into leases, drive test data, location of existing antenna sites in the area, topography in the surrounding area, land cover features in the area such as buildings and foliage, and the results provided by computer propagation software that enables radio frequency engineers to predict the anticipated signal propagation at a given height and location. 17. In order to illustrate the effect that the proposed site would have on coverage in its vicinity, propagation maps have been prepared demonstrating the different coverage levels summarized above. The maps depict the areas presently enjoying reliable service in the vicinity, and the area to be served by the proposed site. As the maps indicate, the proposed facility is of vital importance to MetroPCS' efforts to provide reliable service to the area in question. Unless this application is granted, MetroPCS will be unable to provide reliable service in the vicinity of the Premises. 18. The antennas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service or public safety telecommunications in the surrounding area. N H LASBALZANO Sworn to before me this �L day of fug 2009. �Clu� `2 a.�...•eCG. NOTARY PUBLIC DIANE LAVELLE NOTARY PUBLIC, State Of New York No.01LA6027870 Qualified In Westchester County Commission Expires July 16,20 Z.13 5 v COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ("Lease Agreement") dated as of , is made by and between MetroPCS New York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Lessee") and Town of Southold, a municipal corporation of the State of New York ("Lessor"). RECITALS This Lease Agreement is entered into based upon the following facts, circumstances and understandings: A. Lessor owns certain real property legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and commonly known as Town of Southold Police Deparhnent, 41405 Route 25, Peconic, NY 11958 Assessor's Parcel Number District 1000, Section 75, Block 5, Lot 014.001 ("Lessor's Real Property"). Lessee desires to lease a portion of Lessor's Real Property with any necessary easements over other portions of Lessor's Real Property and/or shared use of Lessor's easements over other real property necessary for Lessee's access and utilities to the leased area (altogether the"Premises"), as described on Exhibit `B" attached hereto. Lessor represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the rights set forth herein and that it has full rights of ingress to and egress from the Premises from a public roadway. B. Lessee desires to construct and operate a wireless communications site at the Premises. C. Based on the premises set forth herein and on the terms and conditions set forth below, Lessor is willing to lease the Premises to Lessee for Lessee's proposed use subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement. WHEREFORE, in consideration of the Premises set forth above and the terms and conditions set forth herein,the parties,intending to be legally bound,hereto agree as follows: 1. Grant of Lease. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee the Premises for Lessee's proposed use, subject to the following terms and conditions for the Term. 2. Permitted Uses. The Premises may be used by Lessee for the operation of a wireless communications site. Under this Lease Agreement, Lessee may install, place, use and operate on the Premises such antennas, radio transmitting and receiving equipment, conduits, wires, batteries, back-up generators, utility lines and facilities, supporting structures, storage facilities, telephone facilities, microwave equipment, and related equip t coNeetiy(<'t�"','" 'S ".ly`nl 'l ` " essee deems necessary for the operation of its wireless unications site at the Premises Futt Lessee may perform construction, maintenance, repair `4a 4o;-end replacement"dY`l ee Facilities as necessary and appropriate for its ongoing bu ins and_has the right to do all work necessary to prepare, modify and maintain the Premises to accomm date essee's Facilities and �s required for Lessee's communications operations at the Premises. Site No.:NY 7315 Page I of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 kEdl a"u d.r+.a�+• 3. Conditions Precedent: Prior Approvals. This Lease Agreement is conditioned upon Lessee obtaining all governmental licenses, permits and approvals enabling Lessee to construct and operate wireless communications facilities on the Premises without conditions which are not standard or typical for premises where wireless communications facilities are located. Lessor agrees to cooperate with Lessee's reasonable requests for Lessor's signatures as real property owner on permit applications, for allowing site inspections by governmental agencies required in connection with reviewing permit applications,and for assistance in obtaining such necessary approvals,provided that such cooperation and assistance shall be at no expense to Lessor. 4. Term. The term of this Lease Agreement("Term")shall be five(5)years commencing on the date Lessee begins construction of Lessee's Facilities on the Premises or eighteen (18) months from the date of full execution of this Lease Agreement,whichever occurs first("Commencement Date"). Lessee shall promptly deliver written notice to Lessor of the Commencement Date. Lessee shall have the right to extend the Term of this Lease Agreement for four(4) additional terms(each a"Renewal Term") of five (5) years each. The terms and conditions for each Renewal Term shall be the same terns and conditions as in this Lease Agreement, except that the Rent shall be increased as set forth hereinbelow. This Lease Agreement shall automatically be extended for each successive five (5) year Renewal Term unless Lessee notifies Lessor in writing of Lessee's intention not to extend this Lease Agreement at least thirty(30)days prior to the expiration of the fust Term or any Renewal Term. 5. Rent. Within forty-five(45)days of the Commencement Date Lessee shall pay Lessor, as rent, the sum of I ("Rent") per month. Rent shall be payable on the first day of each month, in advance,to Lessor or Lessor's alternate payee specified in Section 22, Notices and Deliveries. If the Commencement Date of this Lease Agreement is other than the first day of a calendar month,Lessee may pay on the first day of the Term the prorated Rent for the remainder of the calendar month in which the Term commences, and thereafter Lessee shall pay a full month's Rent on the first day of each calendar month,except that payment shall be prorated for the final fractional month of this Lease Agreement, or if this Lease Agreement is terminated before the expiration of any month for which Rent should have been paid.Rent shall be adjusted as of the fifth(51h)anniversary of the Commencement Date of the Term and of any five(5)year Renewal Term by an increase of of the Rent paid during the previous Term or five(5)year Renewal Term. 6. Due Diligence Contingency and Pre-Commencement Date Access to Premises. Lessee shall have the right(but not the obligation) at any time following the full execution of this Lease Agreement and prior to the Commencement Date, to enter the Premises for the purpose of making necessary inspections, taking measurements and conducting engineering surveys (and soil tests where applicable)and other reasonably necessary tests to determine the suitability of the Premises for Lessee's Facilities ("Due Diligence"), and for the purpose of preparing the Premises for the installation or construction of Lessee's Facilities. During any Due Diligence activities or pre-construction work,Lessee shall have insurance which covers such activities as set forth in Section 16, Insurance. Lessee will notify Lessor of any proposed tests, measurements or pre-construction work and will coordinate the scheduling of such activities with Lessor. If in the course of its Due Diligence Lessee determines that the Premises are unsuitable for Lessee's contemplated use, then Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease Site No.:NY 7315 Page 2 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 Agreement prior to the Commencement Date by delivery of written notice thereof to Lessor as set forth in Section 13,Termination. 7. Oneoine Access to Premises. Throughout the Term and any Renewal Term of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall have the right of access without escort to the Premises for its employees and agents twenty-four (24)hours a day, seven(7) days per week, at no additional charge to Lessee. In exercising its right of access to the Premises herein, Lessee agrees to cooperate with any reasonable security procedures utilized by Lessor at Lessor's Real Property and further agrees not to unduly disturb or interfere with the business or other activities of Lessor or of other tenants or occupants of Lessor's Real Property. Lessor shall maintain all existing access roadways or driveways extending from the nearest public roadway to the Premises in a manner sufficient to allow for Lessee's access to the Premises. Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing such roadways and driveways at Lessor's sole expense,except for any damage caused by Lessee's use of such roadways or driveways. If Lessee causes any such damage,Lessee shall promptly repair the same at its sole expense. Except those constructed by Lessee, Lessor, not Lessee, shall be responsible for the maintenance and compliance with laws of all towers and structures located on the Premises, including compliance with Part 17 of the Federal Communications Commissions' Rules. 8. Lessee's Work. Maintenance and Repairs. All of Lessee's construction and installation work at the Premises shall be performed at Lessee's sole cost and expense and in a good and workmanlike manner.Lessee shall submit copies of the site plan and specifications to the Lessor for prior approval, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Lessor shall give such approval or provide Lessee with its requests for changes within five (5) business days of Lessor's receipt of Lessee's plans. If Lessor does not provide such approval or request for changes within such five (5) business Jay period, Lessor shall be deemed to have approved the plans. LTsor shall not be entitled to receive any additional consideration in exchange for giving its approval cT Lessee's plans. Lessee shall maintain Lessee's Facilities and the Premises in neat and safe condition in compliance with all applicable codes and governmental regulations. Lessee shall not be required to make any repairs to the Premises except for damages to the Premises caused by Lessee, its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. Upon the expiration, cancellation or termination of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall surrender the Premises in good condition, less ordinary wear and tear; however, Lessee shall not be required to remove any foundation supports for Lessee's Facilities or conduits which have been installed by Lessee. 9. Title to Lessee's Facilities. Title to Lessee's Facilities and any equipment placed on the Premises by Lessee shall be held by Lessee.All of Lessee's Facilities shall remain the property of Lessee and are not fixtures. Lessee has the right to remove all Lessee's Facilities at its sole expense on or before the expiration or termination of this Lease Agreement. Lessor acknowledges that Lessee may enter into financing arrangements including promissory notes and financial and security agreements for the financing of Lessee's Facilities(the"Collateral")with a third party financing entity and may in the future enter into additional financing arrangements with other financing entities. In connection therewith, Lessor (i) consents to the installation of the Collateral to the extent that the Collateral is part of the approved Lessee's Facilities;(ii)disclaims any interest in the Collateral,as fixtures or otherwise,whether arising at law or otherwise, including, but not limited to any statutory landlord's lien; and(iii)agrees that the Collateral shall be exempt from execution, foreclosure, sale, levy, attachment,or distress for any Rent due or to become due and that such Collateral may be removed at any time without recourse to legal proceedings. Site No.:NY 7315 Page 3 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 10. Utilities. Lessee shall have the right to install utilities, at Lessee's expense, and to improve the present utilities on or near the Premises (including, but not limited to the installation of emergency back-up power). Subject to Lessor's approval of the location, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, Lessee shall have the right to place utilities on (or to bring utilities across) Lessor's Real Property in order to service the Premises and Lessee's Facilities. Upon Lessee's request, Lessor shall execute recordable easement(s) evidencing this right. Lessee shall fully and promptly pay for all utilities furnished to the Premises for the use,operation and maintenance of Lessee's Facilities. Upon Lessee's request, Lessor shall allow Lessee to install sub-metering equipment on existing Lessor utility service(s). Lessee agrees to install, at Lessee's cost, the required equipment, meters and connections and will reimburse Lessor for Lessee's use of utilities at a rate equal to Lessor's unit cost for the utilities. Lessee shall pay the cost of utility service provided to the Premises and attributable to Lessee's use ("Utility Charge"). Lessee shall pay the estimated cost of the Utility Charge monthly in advance. The parties estimate the Utility Charge at the commencement of construction to be per month. During the term of this Lease Agreement, at Lessor's request(which request shall not be more frequent than once every twelve months), Lessee shall calculate the actual Utility Charge for the immediately preceding twelve (12) months based on the readings from the privately installed sub-meter at Lessor's property. If the actual Utility Charge varies from the estimated Utility Charges paid, the parties shall reconcile past payments of utility charges and adjust future estimates of the Utility Charge to reflect Lessee's actual usage. 11. Interference with Communications. Lessee's Facilities and operations shall not interfere with the communications configurations, frequencies or operating equipment which exist on Lessor's Real Property on the effective date of this Lease Agreement ("Pre-existing Communications"), and Lessee's Facilities and operations shall comply with all non-interference rules of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"). Upon written notice from Lessor of apparent interference by Lessee with Pre-existing Communications, Lessee shall have the responsibility to promptly terminate such interference or demonstrate to Lessor with competent information that the apparent interference in fact is not caused by Lessee's Facilities or operations. Lessor shall not,nor shall Lessor permit any other tenant or occupant of any portion of Lessor's Real Property to, engage in any activities or operations which interfere with the communications operations of Lessee described in Section 2, above. Such interference with Lessee's communications operations shall be deemed a material breach by Lessor, and Lessor shall have the responsibility to promptly terminate said interference. In the event any such interference does not cease promptly, the parties acknowledge that continuing interference will cause irreparable injury to Lessee, and therefore Lessee shall have the right to bring a court action to enjoin such interference or to terminate this Lease Agreement immediately upon notice to Lessor. Lessor agrees to incorporate equivalent provisions regarding non-interference with Pre-existing Communications into any subsequent leases, licenses or rental agreements with other persons or entities for any portions of Lessor's Real Property. 12, Takes. Lessor shall be responsible for payment of any and all ad valorem taxes levied upon the lands, improvements and other property of Lessor. Lessee shall be responsible for all taxes levied upon Lessee's leasehold improvements (including Lessee's equipment building and tower)on the Premises. Lessor shall provide Lessee with copies of all assessments notices on or including the Premises immediately upon receipt,but in no event later than thirty(30)days after receipt by Lessor. If Lessor fails to provide such notice within such time frame,Lessor shall be responsible for all increases in taxes for the year covered by the assessment. Lessee shall have the right to contest, in good faith, the validity or the amount of any tax or assessment levied against the Premises by such appellate or other proceedings as may be appropriate in the jurisdiction, and may defer payment of such obligations, pay same under Site No.:NY 7315 Page 4 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 - --- -------- protest, or take such other steps as Lessee may deem appropriate. This right shall include the ability to institute any legal,regulatory or informal action in the name of the Lessor,Lessee,or both,with respect to the valuation of the Premises. Lessor shall cooperate in the institution and prosecution of any such proceedings and will execute any documents required therefore. The expense of any such proceedings shall be borne by Lessee and any refunds or rebates secured as a result of Lessee's action shall belong to Lessee. 13. Termination. This Lease Agreement may be terminated by Lessee effective immediately without further liability by delivery of written notice thereof to Lessor prior to the Commencement Date for any reason resulting from Lessee's Due Diligence, or if a title report obtained by Lessee for Lessor's Real Property shows any defects of title or any liens or encumbrances which may adversely affect Lessee's use of the Premises for Lessee's intended use, or for any other or no reason. This Lease may be terminated without further liability on thirty(30)days prior written notice as follows: (i) by either party upon a default of any covenant, condition, or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured within sixty(60) days of receipt of written notice of default; (ii) by Lessee if it does not obtain licenses, permits or other approvals necessary to the construction or operation of Lessee's Facilities ("Permits"), is unable to obtain such Permits without conditions which are not standard or typical for premises where wireless communications facilities are located or is unable to maintain such licenses, permits or approvals despite reasonable efforts to do so; (iii) by Lessee if Lessee is unable to occupy or utilize the Premises due to ruling or directive of the FCC or other governmental or regulatory agency, including, but not limited to, a take back of frequencies; or(iv) by Lessee if Lessee determines that the Premises are not appropriate for its operations for economic, environmental or technological reasons, including,without limitation, signal strength or interference. Other than as stated herein,Lessor shall not have the right to terminate,revoke or cancel this Lease Agreement. 14. Destruction of Premises. If the Premises or Lessor's Property is destroyed or damaged so as in Lessee's judgment to hinder its effective use of Lessor's Property for the ongoing operation of a wireless communications site, Lessee may elect to terminate this Lease Agreement without further liability of Lessee as of the date of the damage or destruction by so notifying Lessor no more than thirty (30) days following the date of damage or destruction. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties which do not survive the termination of this Lease Agreement shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction. 15. Condemnation. If a condemning authority takes all of Lessor's Real Property, or a portion which in Lessee's reasonable opinion is sufficient to render the Premises unsuitable for Lessee's ongoing operation of a wireless communications site,then this Lease Agreement shall terminate without further liability of Lessee as of the date when possession is delivered to the condemning authority. hr any condemnation proceeding each party shall be entitled to make a claim against the condemning authority for just compensation recoverable under applicable condemnation law. Sale of all or part of the Premises to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of its power of eminent domain shall be treated as a taking by a condemning authority. 16. Insurance. Lessee shall maintain the following insurance: (1) Commercial General Liability with limits of per occurrence, (2) Automobile Liability with a combined single limit of 111M per accident, (3) Workers Compensation as required by law, and (4) Employer's Lia t ity with limits of 41�lper occurrence. Lessor, at Lessor's sole cost and expense, shall procure and maintain on the Property, bodily injury and property damage insurance with a combined single limit of at least- Site No.:NY 7315 Page 5 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11955 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 r occurrence. Such insurance shall insure, on an occurrence basis, against liability of Lessor, its employees and agents arising out of or in connection with Lessor's use, occupancy and maintenance of the Property. Each party shall be named as an additional insured on the other's policy. Each parry shall provide to the other a certificate of insurance evidencing the coverage required by this paragraph within thirty (30) days of the Commencement Date. Each party waives any rights of recovery against the other for injury or loss due to hazards covered by their property insurance, and each party shall require such insurance policies to contain a waiver of recovery against the other. 17. Asshmments or Transfers. Lessor may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement to any person or entity without any requirement for prior approval by Lessee, provided that such assignee or transferee agrees in writing to fulfill the duties and obligations of the Lessor in said Lease Agreement, including the obligation to respect Lessee's rights to nondisturbance and quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the remainder of the Term and any Renewal Term hereof.Lessee may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement without prior approval by Lessor to any of Lessee's partners, shareholders, members, subsidiaries,or affiliates,to any entity in which Lessee or any of its affiliates holds an ownership interest, or to a person or entity acquiring by purchase, merger or operation of law a majority of the value of the assets of Lessee or to any entity whose business is the ownership of telecommunication towers. Lessee shall not assign or transfer this Lease Agreement to any other person or entity without the prior written approval of Lessor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Lessee may assign or transfer this Lease Agreement upon written notice to Lessor provided that any such assignee assumes all of Lessee's obligations hereunder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Lessee may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer without consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing entity, or agent on behalf of any financing entity to whom Lessee (i) has obligations for borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by loans, bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations under or with respect to letters of credit,bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof. 18. Subleases. Lessee at its sole discretion shall have the right, without any need to obtain the consent of Lessor,to license or sublease all or a portion of the Premises and the Lessee's Facilities to others whose business includes the provision of wireless communication services. Lessee's licensee(s) and sublessee(s) shall be entitled to modify the Lessee's Facilities and to erect additional improvements on the Premises including but not limited to antennas, dishes, cabling, additional storage buildings or equipment shelters as are reasonably required for the operation and maintenance of the communications equipment to be installed on the Premises by said licensee(s) and sublessee(s). Lessee's licensee(s) and sublessee(s) shall be entitled to all rights of ingress and egress to the Premises and the right to install utilities on the Premises as if said licensee or sublessee were the Lessee under this Lease Agreement. 19. Nondisturbance and Ouiet Eniovment;Subordination,Estoppel Certificates. (a) So long as Lessee is not in default under this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall be entitled to quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the term of this Lease Agreement or any Renewal Term,and Lessee shall not be disturbed in its occupancy and use of the Premises. (b) This Lease Agreement shall be subordinate to each and every deed of trust, mortgage or other security instrument which may now or hereafter affect Lessor's Real Property and to any renewals, extensions, supplements, amendments, modifications or replacements thereof. In Site No.:NY 7315 Page 6 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 confirmation of such subordination, Lessee shall execute and deliver promptly any certificate of subordination that Lessor may reasonably request, provided that such certificate acknowledges that this Lease Agreement remains in full force and effect, recognizes Lessee's right to nondisturbance and quiet enjoyment of the Premises so long as Lessee is not in default under this Lease Agreement, only contains true and accurate statements and Lessee's liability shall be capped at the remaining rent under this Lease Agreement. If any mortgagee or lender succeeds to Lessor's interest in Lessor's Real Property through a foreclosure proceeding or by a deed in lieu of foreclosure, Lessee shall attorn to and recognize such successor as Lessor under this Lease Agreement. (c) At any time upon not less than ten (10) days' prior written notice by Lessor, Lessee shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to Lessor or any other party specified by Lessor a statement in writing certifying that this Lease Agreement is in full force and effect, if true, and the status of any continuing defaults under this Lease Agreement. 20. Indemnifications. (a) Lessee's Indemnity. Lessee hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Lessor and Lessor's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors harmless from and against any and all losses, claims, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) and injuries(including personal injuries or death)arising from or in connection with Lessee's use, operation, maintenance or repair of Lessee's Facilities at the Premises or access over Lessor's Real Property or Lessee's shared use of Lessor's easements for access to the Premises, except those resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor or Lessor's officers, directors,partners, shareholders,employees,agents,contractors or subcontractors. (b) Lessor's Indemnity. Lessor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Lessee and Lessee's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors harmless from and against any and all losses, claims, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses(including reasonable attorney's fees and costs)and injuries (including personal injuries or death) arising from or in connection with Lessor's use, operation, maintenance or repair of improvements on Lessor's Real Property, Lessor's shared use of easements for access to Lessor's Real Property, any violation of governmental regulations relating to the Premises and any towers used by Lessee (including the lighting or painting for aviation pathways), except those resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of Lessee or Lessee's officers, directors, partners, shareholders, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. (c) Survival of Indemnity Provisions. The indemnity provisions of this section shall survive the expiration,cancellation or expiration of this Lease Agreement. 21. Hazardous Materials. Lessee agrees that it will not use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Lessor's Real Property in violation of any law or regulation. Lessor represents,warrants and agrees(1)that neither Lessor nor,to Lessor's knowledge,any third party has used,generated, stored or disposed of,or permitted the use, generation,storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material(defined below)on,under,about or within Lessor's Real Property in violation of any law or regulation,and(2)that Lessor will not,and will not permit any third party to use,generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on,under, about or within Lessor's Real Property in violation of any law or regulation. Lessor and Lessee each agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other and the other's partners, affiliates, agents and employees against any and all losses, liabilities, claims Site No.:NY 7315 Page 7 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 and/or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) arising from any breach of any representation,warranty or agreement contained in this paragraph. As used in this paragraph,"Hazardous Material' shall mean petroleum or any petroleum product,asbestos, any substance known by the state in which Lessor's Real Property is located to cause cancer and/or reproductive toxicity, and/or any substance, chemical or waste that isidentified as hazardous,toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. This paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 22. Notices and Deliveries. Any notice or demand required to be given herein shall be made by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, confirmed fax, or reliable overnight delivery service to the address of the respective parties set forth below: Lessor: Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Rd PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Atm: Lori Hulse Telephone: 631 765 1939 Facsimile: 631 765 6639 Federal Taxpayer ID Number: 11-600-1939 Lessee: MetroPCS 5 Skyline Dr. Hawthorne,NY 10532 Attn: Property Manager With a copy to: MetroPCS New York,LLC 2250 Lakeside Boulevard Richardson,TX 75082 Attn: Property Manager Telephone: 215-265-2550 Facsimile: 866-457-4126 Lessor or Lessee may from time to time designate any other address for notices or deliveries by written notice to the other party. 23. Miscellaneous. (a) Severability. If any provision of the Lease Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction with respect to any party,the remainder of this Lease Agreement or the application of such provision to persons other than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected, each provision of this Lease Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law, and the parties shall negotiate in good faith to amend this Lease Agreement to retain the economic effect of the invalid or unenforceable provisions. Site No.:NY 7315 Page 8 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 (b) Binding Effect. Each party represents and warrants that said party has full power and authority, and the person(s)executing this Lease Agreement have full power and authority,to execute and deliver this Lease Agreement, and that this Lease Agreement constitutes a valid and binding obligation of each party, enforceable in accordance with its terms,except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,moratorium or other laws affecting the enforcement of creditor's rights generally and by general equitable principles (whether enforcement is sought in proceedings in equity or at law). This Lease Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and permitted assignees of the respective parties. (c) Waivers. No provision of this Lease Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by a party unless the waiver is in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of the waiver is attempted. No custom or practice which may develop between the parties in the implementation or administration of the terms of this Lease Agreement shall be construed to waive or lessen any right to insist upon strict performance of the terms of this Lease Agreement. (d) Governing Law. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State in which the Premises are located. (e) Attorneys' Fees and Costs. The prevailing party in any legal claim arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs. (f) Survival. Terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement which by their sense and context survive the termination,cancellation or expiration of this Lease Agreement will so survive. (g) Memorandum of Lease. Lessor acknowledges that a Memorandum of Agreement substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit C will be recorded by Lessee in the Official Records of the County where the Property is located. (h) Entire Agreement: Amendments. This Lease Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding Lessee's lease of the Premises and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous offers, negotiations and other agreements concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Lease Agreement must be in writing and executed by duly authorized representatives of both parties. (i) No Presumptions Regarding Preparation of Lease Agreement. The parties acknowledge and agree that each of the parties has been represented by counsel or has had full opportunity to consult with counsel and that each of the parties has participated in the negotiation and drafting of this Lease Agreement. Accordingly it is the intention and agreement of the parties that the language, terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement are not to be construed in any way against or in favor of any party hereto by reason of the roles and responsibilities of the parties or their counsel in connection with the preparation of this Lease Agreement. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Site No.:NY 7315 Page 9 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Lease Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates set forth below and acknowledge that this Lease Agreement is effective as of the date first above written. LESSOR: Town of Southold, a municipal corporation of the State of New York By: Cry ignature) Print Name: c.o-++ q- &_I, A Title: SCntA 0(L Date: By: (Signature) Print Name: Title: Date: LESSEE: MetroPC ew Y a Delaw limited i i mpany By ( ature) Print Name: Dan Olmetti Title: VP-Gener I Man//a er-New York Date: y Site No.:NY 7315 Page 10 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF LESSOR'S REAL PROPERTY to the Lease Agreement dated ,200 by and between Town of Southold,a municipal corporation of the State of New York as Lessor, and MetroPCS New York,LLC,a Delaware limited liability company,as Lessee. Lessor's Property of which Premises are a part is described as follows: See Next page Site No.:NY 7315 Page 11 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 '1-0WkN QF SollTllol.n of :7'kC A,NL)NO IN ISDESCRIP7'LQN That Piece or Parcel of land situate, lying and being us Taconic,in lilt'[*own of Southold, Suffolk Courtly,New York,houndod and devcribad as follows; 131MINNING at it stake act on lite westerly side of Peconic Loo which stake foals the southeasterly comer of the hereinailer descnhed Premises and the northeasterly comer of hand of Peconic Trucking Company;running thcnce north 30^00'west along the westerly aide orpeconic Lanc 112.00 feet to a slake,running thcnce south 56"10'weal along other land of tho panics of the flrsl pan 246.93 rcet to u point; running thence south 30'10'30"cast along other land orthe parties orthe lint part 146.42 feat to it point;naming thence north 4X'17 cost along other land orthe parties orthe first port and land of Pcconic Trucking Company 251 ZI feet to the point or place ol'heginning. All that cenuin plot,piece or Parcel of had,with the buildings and improvements thereon erected,situate,lying and being in lite TOWN OF S01.11'1101.1),of Peconic, Suffolk County, New fork,bounded and doacrilled its follows: IWGINNINU it u Point oat the easterly line of Imrd of the Davids l:aeale land the westerly line of land of tho'Ttmo of Southold,North 30" 10 50"West 208.32 feet from the northerly Zinc of the Main RvluL running thence along lantl of said Dovida Estate,South 48"411'00"West 244.8.1 Not to the eorthcuatcdy comer of land or Sicmamonn;thence along land or Davids listutc, North 73' 31'.10"West 822,85 Coat to land of IYobck;thence along said land of Dohck. North 46'42'210" Bust 271!1•)fort',thence along Hund of Dohck anti laud of Surozenski,South 32' 34' 30"1:1114 SS7.8v feet;thence along land of Lathonr and along land or tho Town or Southold,South 30" 11)'50" 1-4011278.41 feel to the point orheginning. All that ansa plot,piece or puree)of land,with[)o buildings and improvements thereon crected,siaato,lying And being in lite Town or Southold,at Peconic,Sull'olk County,New York, bouralcd and described its k'ollows: 111?6INNINU at it point on the northerly side of Main Road at the southwest comer of lite prenniscs herein described adjoining[lad of Stankcy Oadonuki oil the wcs1;running thence along said land of(.iudotnski,North 33" 31'20"West 1020.01'ect to a locust pont tend land of Dohck; running thence along land of Dolick North 46" 42'21y' Las120.15 feet to u monument and land of the Town ol'Southold;running thence along void Lund ortho,town orSouthoid South 33" 31' 20" tont 822.83 fool to u monument and land of Stemetnuno; running thence along said had of Sterncnkua:(1l South 48'4(r Wcst too feel and(2)South 36" $3'(lo" i?ash 205 cot o the Northerly line ol'Main Rout; thcnce mooing along the Northerly lint of Mo n d South 48" 411'West 177.84 fact to the Point or place of BEGINNING, S Assessors Parcel Number:District 1000, Section 75,Block 5, Lot 014.001 Site No.:NY 7315 Page 12 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 EXH BTT B DESCRIPTION OF PREARSES to the Lease Agreement dated ,200_,by and between Town of Southold, a municipal corporation of the State of New York,as Lessor,and MetroPCS New York LLC,a Delaware limited liability company,as Lessee. The Premises consist of those specific areas described/shown below or attached where Lessee's communications antennae, equipment and cables occupy Lessor's Real Property. The Premises and the associated utility connections and access, including easements, ingress, egress, dimensions, and locations as described/shown, are approximate only and may be adjusted or changed by Lessee at the time of construction to reasonably accommodate sound engineering criteria and the physical features of Lessor's Real Property. SEE ATTACHED DRAWINGS (A final drawing or copy of a property survey or site plan depicting the above shall replace this Exhibit B when initialed by Lessor or Lessor's designated agent and may be modifiedfrom time to time when initialed by both Lessor and Lessee.) Site No.:NY 7315 Page 13 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 O+FROPOEiEO ELECTRO ROVTEO OVERHEAD(8014 EXI5TIN6 SIMAPPROXIMATELOCATION SITE LOCATION A PROP POLE RO TO HEHNS,METRO PCS POLE IN COMPOUND O PROPOSED 6ROAb RING•, 0=FROP05ED TELCO FROM EXISTING CS'CABINET RCUTEO 1 IfNDER6ROM TO NEN COMPOUND 4 v KEY PLAN PROPOSED METRO PC5 PANEL 2 SCALE:NOT TO SC ANTENNAS(TYP.OF 2 PER SECTOR,6 TOTAL)ON ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES FIOLMED TO EASTINS TOPHI LE& EXISTING 131'-6'HI6H SELF SUPFORTIN5 LATTICE TOPER 520, ISTING EWIPMBrt &PMMA AREA(BY OTHERS) SECTOR EXISTING PROPOSED METRO PC5 } E6IUIPMENT 12'-0'x15'-0'FBICED COIF'O)ND SHELTER By PATH W WOE AGCI GATE O HERS/ �) PROPOSED NEWPC5 ECLIF}@Lf CABIIEM(TIP.OF 4)MOMTED ON 1�. 1 STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO BETA CONCRETE BLAB 080 S0.PT.LEASE SECTORSO, AREA)(BE LE-S DE FOR TAILS) O ALPHA SECTOR EXISTING EQUIPMENT LE-2 SHELTER(BY OTHERS) Q 1 EX15TIN5 GENERATOR EXI5TIN6 CSC CABINET 1 EXISTING EOUIPMEM EXISTINS OIL TANK SHELTER(BY OTHERS) EXISTING UTILITY EXISTINS 6H16H CHAIN LINK PENCE POLE^259 PV BARBED MRS PROPOSED ELECTRIC ROUTED PROPOSED VI C0NEVIT5 OVEFIIEAD FROM EXISTING ROUTED UNDER&R0.fID TO HEN VTILITY POLE#259 TO NEW COMPCVND METRO PC5 POLE IN COMPOUND PARTIAL SITE PLAN y lie NOTE 1. LEASE EXWeRS GNE RTED ARE A OQNWPIDAL DESIGN OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT ONLY.ALNAL MDA 4/14 4RLHILELTURAL/ENGMEERNG LLNSTFULTION DOCUMENTS MAY VARY TO DESCRIPTION BY G' PLY WTH ALL BUILDING CODES AND ANY uIYORESEEN CONDITIONS. 2,THE INFOR1ATION SHCUN 15 TOKEN FROM A TAPE SURVEY FERFORNED BT'THE MTM DESIGN GRCllP IN "WRING THE SITE VISIT. 3,LOCATION SNOW 16 APPROXIMATE.FINAL LOCATION SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE DESIGN PHASE. E V I SE O .4D RE SS JE5 4,24/ T ACCESS 15 REMIREO FOR SERVICE TECRNICIAN6.EOEGTTF,0 BER SER/CLE5FF BY ALL BEER SHALLES PR SE TO EASE E HIBCN DOCUMENT PHASE.IT, EVISED PER CLIENT COMMENTS JBC UESMITT FOR APPROVA JBC Oi" TIRE: KEY PLAN 4 SITE PLAN 414e)5 ROUTE 25 coeur:metroPCS m 41406 ROUTE 26 LE - 1 ARCHITECTURE NEW YORK LLC PECONIC, NY 11958 E N GI NE B R I NG nvl�+� .G9 N)'. GflPYN 9Y' GICL40 BY: 911E- NY1315 _TOP OF EXISTING WHIP ANTENNAS(BY OTHERS) _ 148'-10'-ABOVE GF _—_ EXISTING WIP ANTENNAS BY OTHERS TOP OF EXI5TING TOPER I CENTER OF EXISTING PANEL ANTENNAS _ _ 131'-b'x PBOVE GRADE EXISTING POLICE ANTENNAS CENTER OF EXISTING ANTENNAS Y OTHERS) _ 100'TER pgWE GRACE TOP OF PROP.METRO PG5 ANTENNAS_ CENTER OF PROP.NETRO P65 ANTENNAS _ If 90'-0'1 ABOVE GRACE I I I PROPOEBV METRO PG5 PANEL ANTEKKA5(NP.OF 2 PER SECTOR,6 TOTAL)ON ANTENNA LES SJPFORT PRAXES M0.NTED TO EXISTING TOWER LEG � EXISPNG 131'-6'HIGH SELF SRPORTINb LATTICE TOWER I PROPOS®METRO PCS COAXIAL GABLES R Ef U'TOWER ON NEW WAVE WIDE LAOOER I I PROPOSED METRO PG5 COAXIAL GABLES ROUfm ALONG CABLE BRI176E I pROPOSEp METRO PLS 6P5 UNIT MOUNTED To GABLE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST 1 I PROF05ED UTILITY POLE INSTALLED IN XPJ'/COHPOA:D I PROPOSED NETRO PG5 ENIPMEW CABINETS (i OF 4)MPINTED ON STEEL RAILS 1 ANCHORED TO L ` (HBO SO.FT. N NOTE, LEASE AREA(`SEE�LE-3E-3 F FOR DETAILS) I SOME EX15TIN6 EOJIPMENT NOT EXISTING EOUIPMENT SHELTER(BY OTHERS) 540M FOR CLARITY. I I I PROPOEED METRO PLS 12'-0kl5'-0'FENDED COMPOMO WITH(7)4'WIDE ACCESS SATES EXISTING 6HIGH CHAIN LINK EX15TING Ep11PMENT FENCE W/BARBED WIRE � SMELTER Y 0 1 EXISTIN6 EMIPMENT SHELTER ET OTHERS) APPROX.6RAOE NORTH ELEVATION " a oescRlPnoN 5r 56ALE:1'4200B EVISED PER CLIENT COMMENTS JBCA LJ MITT F A OVAL JBC AAI�AA ME: E L.E VAT ON PIa.�T, 41405 ROUTE 25 DESIGNS i G R O U P- metroP�+�S® -0-:. 41405 ROUTE 25 LE -2 dH RCI T ECT U RF E N G 1 N E E R I N G NEW YORK LLC PECQV O, NY ISSS .w-xlusnmm .GB 1b: DRPnY fT': LHELKFD BY: 511E Ip: 05MPST5006 JBC Set NY1315 PROPOSED METRO FC5 PANEL AMENNAS(TYP.Of 2 PER SECTOR,6 TOTAL)ON ANTENNA SR POW FRAMES MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOYER LES FROF05ED METRO FG5 wAXIAL GAry Fq RIMED W TOYER ON NEW \ Il4VE WIDE LADDER �O0 I 0 EXISTING ACCESS GATE PROPOSED METRO PGS COAXIAL GABLES RaTW ALONG GABLE BRDSE EXISTING 1514' I1 CHAIN LINK FENCE HIEN SELF SLPPORTING LATTICE TOWER PROPOSED PETRO PGS GPS UNIT MO,NiED TO GABLE BRIDSE SLPPORT POST 00 TE SLPH I Th 77 I � 11 -S POLE INSTALLED I POLE INSTALLED IN - TEIr wMFallo PROPOSED ELECTRG Rarlw OVERHEAD p Q FROM EXISTING VTILRY cj POLE 11259 TO NEW METRO M5 FOLE IN wMPCVND / MOUNTE T PGS PTC CABINET MOUNTED TO UJISTRR FRAME EX15TIN6 6'NIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE PROPOSED METRO PCS EW &tE IPMENi CA15 W/3AX5w WIRE (TYP.OF 4)MCVNTFD ON STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO CONCRETE SLAB 060 SO.FT. LEASE AR%(SEE LE-5 FOR DETAILS) PROP05M METRO FG5 12'-0'x15'-0'FENCED CONPOJW WITH(2)4'WIDE ACCESS SATES ti PA DATE DESCRIPTION BY r�EQUIPMENT PLAN SCALE 3/16"=I'-0" 05/05/09 RE vISE� ADORE SS JEa 04/11/09 REVISED PER CLIENT COMMENTS JBC 04/16/09 SUBMITTED FO A ROV6i IJEr 111LE: IFO.ELt: EQUIPMENT PLAN 41405 ROUTE 25 DESIGN" "'°T' LE -3 2 GROUP- metroPCS® wR�s. 41405 ROUTE L 25 E —3 ARCIiITECTURE E N G I ry e!x I ry G NEW YORK LLC PECONIC, NY 11958 E 1a: oxnYN ar, curcXEo er.. Nre lq 0 Fl5T5008 JBC 56t NY1315 EXHMIT C MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CLERK: Please return this document to:MetroPCS New York,LLC 5 Skyline Drive Hawthorne,NY 10532 Ann.:Property Manager This Memorandum of Agreement is entered into on this day of ,by and between Town of Southold a municipal corporation of the State of New York with an office at 53095 Main Road, Peconic, NY 11971 (hereinafter referred to as "Lessor"),and MetroPCS New York LLC,a Delaware limited liability company,with an office at (hereinafter referred to as"Lessee"). 1. Lessor and Lessee entered into a Communications Site Lease Agreement ["Agreement'] on the day of for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining a communications facility and other improvements. All of the foregoing is set forth in the Agreement. 2. The term of the Agreement is for five(5)years commencing on the date Lessee begins construction of Lessee Facilities or eighteen months from full execution of this Lease Agreement whichever first occurs("Commencement Date")and terminating on the fifth anniversary of the Commencement Date, with four L4__)successive five(5)year options to renew. In no event shall the term of the Agreement exceed thirty-five(35)years. 3. The Land which is the subject of the Agreement is described in Exhibit A annexed hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Memorandum of Agreement as of the day and year first above written. LESSOR: LESSEE: Town of Southold,a municipal corporation of the State MetroPCS New York LLC,a Delaware limited liability of New York company EY: g/ "Fry—y® Ae-- , Name: , J 3 . Title: Title: <3 Date: r` k + •'i! a;!• „e ` F" '! ] l f y ✓ Ey: Name: Title: S Date: Site No.:NY 7315 Page 14 of 15 Site Address:Main Rd,Peconic,NY 11958 EXECUTION COPY 6.2.09 EBI Consulting Visual Analysis Prepared For: metroPCS. Unlimit Yourself® PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY NY7315 41405 ROUTE 25 Provided By: EBI Consulting November 17, 2009 ANN N N+ MEBI �::-:�..� . _ ,_..... . PN: 61096336 C O N S U L T I N G Creating Valuefor Your Business Site Number: NY7315 41405 Route 25 Peconic, NY 11958 Prepared For: Metro PCS Provided By: EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 ph. 781.273.2500 fax 781.273.3311 ISSUED: 11117109 REV 1 REV 2 DRAWN BY VC CHECKED BY RAJ Note: These photo simulations are intended to represent modifications relative to a person observing the aesthetics of the proposed telecommunications installation. Therefore, they are inherently approximate in nature and should not be used as an exact, scaled, engineering drawing. WEBI 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 C0NSU1. TING Tel: (781) 273.2500 www.ebiconsulting.com Fax: (781) 273.331 1 Letter of Methodology November 19,2009 41405 Route 25 Peconic, NY 11958 Re:Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Site Name: NY73I S—41405 Route 25 The following is a description of the methodology used by EBI Consulting in preparing the visual analysis study of the proposed MetroPCS installation for the site located at 41405 Route 25, Peconic, NY("Property"). The proposed facility("Facility")consists of small panel antennas mounted to the existing tower("Existing Tower")at the Property and also related equipment on the ground. Both the antennas and equipment will match the existing antennas and equipment so as to not have any adverse visual impact to the area. A site visit was made on November 1&2009 and photographs were taken from various locations around the Facility using an Olympus E- 500 digital camera. The actual weather condition was partly cloudy yet within acceptable levels to perform the visual analysis. Using the technical and mechanical specification documents we built and arranged the Facility using 3D software called 3D Studio Max. 3D Studio Max allows us to add a daylight system that calculates what direction the sun will point according to what time of day,the date,and from the location the photographs were taken. The next step involved loading the map and the photographs taken at the site into 3D Studio Max and positioning virtual cameras in the software, based on the locations the photos were taken from. These cameras represent the photographer who took the photographs and it takes into consideration the average height at which the camera would have been held by an average five to six foot person. These cameras are placed at the exact locations on the map;therefore it automatically calculates the exact distance and perspective of the Facility. This generated simulated 3D views of the photographer's viewpoint plus the addition of the 3D model of the proposed Facility. Once these simulated viewpoints were created in 3D Studio Max, realistic lighting, shadows, and materials were rendered upon the proposed Facility and the result is multiple images that depict the proposed Facility on the photograph. The new images created by 3D Studio Max are imported into software called Photoshop and each view is labeled accordingly based upon the information provided by the field technician. The final product results in high quality existing and proposed images that accurately depict the addition of the proposed Facility. Kindly note that photo simulations are intended to represent modifications relative to a person observing the aesthetics of the proposed Facility.Therefore,they are inherently approximate in nature and should not be used as an exact,scaled,engineering drawing. Sincerely, Ross Jackson Graphic Design Manager EBI Consulting Office: 781-418-2339 FAX:781-418-2359 Mobile:781-552.1466 ross.6acksonfilebiconsultine.com www.ebiconsultine.com ENVIROBUSINESC INC. LOCATIONS I ATLANTA. GA BALTIMOR[ MD BURLINGTON, MA I CHICAGOI DA,LAS.TX I DENVER. CO I HOUSTON, TX US ANGELES. CA I NFW YORK. NY ! PHOENIX AZ I PORTLAND. OR SAN FRANC ISCO, CA I SEATTLE.. WA ; YORK, PA VISIBILITY MAP �4 y area P Peconic wxs acs,ay Peak zs Goldsmdh's Inlet Pari co la 26 x 25 East Cu chogut utchoguStation 1 25 Nassau Germs mi Legend 0 N Project Site • Photo Location Points • Non-Visible Locations W E Photo location Map METRO PCS/NY7315 S 41405 ROUTE 25 EBI PECONIC, NY 11938 coys L1. r 1N 1; Lean,ig Vube I< Yow awmev PN: 61096336 View 1 I Rrl PTO --opvright. 2009 EBI COtISLilt ng • EXISTING CONDITIONS LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM CORNER OF MAIN RD. & WELLS RD. (1,820' FROM TOWER) View 1 I t1 • 1 I PROPOSED melroPCS ANTENNAS y r PROPOSED metroPCS ANTENNAS LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM CORNER OF MAIN RD. & WELLS RD. (1,820' FROM TOWER) View 2 r. a r i a 3 r 10• EBI Consulting--, EXISTING CONDITIONS LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 1250 PECONIC LN. (960' FROM TOWER) View 2 'Oki ol M.. -� PROPOSED metroPCS • ANTENNAS 1 11• EBI Consulting7-� PROPOSED metroPCS ANTENNAS LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 1250 PECONIC LN. (960' FROM TOWER) a r r STOP` 1 s A. Y1 Copyright©2009 EBI Consulting View 3 PROPOSED metroPCS ANTENNAS i IFS ilk AALAIL� I� I t�i i P +a • - Copyright©2009 EBI Consulting PROPOSED met •PCS ANTENNAS LOOKING NORTH • • OF MAIN RD. & INDIAN (1,460' • • r I ^ Copyrig nt 9 2009 EBI Consulting { • A7. r '2 all— Jr INA Iq As <e �' r . 1 $ ", �C �•.L �l .�l n •� �t w �,�', ,._ < •✓ t r t' ` it �.i. �.e w' Tr y� •i -,. -.l �•.• ��- .,opytight�_�2009 E81 Consulti g I 1 -- ��. s r '�. , •?� r.. Jit{ {:�S r`f s{+� r'.• �i,y'�� 'y�r.�. r �,. " .tiyf},r- "*a �"' • •�v ��,J S } v.'' ����,.!''Ai•. NN. r 1 r tr r . � s+A.t~ i ���.��y s r -..d!'a�t� r >€ �'. �o,�•/-phi ' '?09 EBI Cons,dbng EXISTING CONDITIONS • • NORTHEAST FROM (2,700' FROM • - Copyright's 2009 EBI Consulting PROPOSED • • •KING NORTHEAST FROM • 1 1 • TOWER) f e: Coo�rig ht -' 7499 F31 Consulting EXISTING CONDITIONS • • •UTHEAST FROM CORNER • 1' FROM TOWER) s l .l Liv e p . i a - - - Copyng ht �2009 EBI Consulting PROPOSED • • •KING SOUTHEAST FROM • ' OF 1 • TOWER) I •s � i � r e ''�®c' Szyi �� �R a>�4�>,�.{3 �lxti�� � � '..� � ��' °a,�1y�a r `� ..,1. d�I� IRe�7► Sit am`1�:�..+9'�s�R„+G' �°L � e� F" •. �+_ �� „n�. . Co right n 2009 EBI Cons Wting. �� � �• �4t�, apt+9�j q_ Co right�2009 EBI Consulting. Federal Aviation Almistration Aeronautical Study No. Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2009-AEA-2370-OE 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth,TX 76137-0520 Issued Date: 08/26/2009 Marc Harris HPC Development, LLC 52 Garden Ave. Wharton,NJ 07885 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U nS.0 Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations;pari 7l;'concemmg: -1 Structure: Antenna- Side Mount NY7315 Location: Peconic,NY Latitude: 41-02-29.00N NAD 83 Longitude: 72-27-30.87W Heights: 132 feet above ground level (AGL) 148 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are)met€ Based on this evaluation,marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis,we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates ,heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates ,heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,power, or the addition of other transmitters,requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc.,which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. Page 1 of 3 If we can be of further assistan*lease contact our office at(718) 553-45*On any future correspondence concerning this matter,please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2009-AEA-2370-OE. Signature Control No: 644345-118052324 (DNE) Katie Venticinque Specialist Attachment(s) Frequency Data Page 2 of 3 ' r equency Data for ASN 2009-AEA-237#AE LOW HIGH FREQUENCY ERP FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP UNIT 806 824 MHz 500 W 824 849 MHz 500 W 851 866 MHz 500 W 869 894 MHz 500 W 896 901 MHz 500 W 901 902 MHz 7 W 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W 932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW 935 940 MHz 1000 W 940 941 MHz 3500 W 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W 2305 2310 MHz 2000 W 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W 1730 1740 MHz 61 dBm 2130 2140 MHz 61 dBm Page 3 of 3 �a-`e�Y Oieral Communications COmOss'ion rd' ,6 Page 1 of 2 Fs J Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 93 v + � ,'royM! o s' Radio Station. Authorization LICENSEE NAME: Met^oPCS AWS,, LLC FCC Registration Number(FRN) MARK A. STACHIW 0015005598 M£TROPCSAWS, LLC 3144 WALNUT HI.L.L LANE., SUITE 800 Call Sign File Number DALLAS TX 75231 WQGA73.1 0002773870 Radio Service AW - AWS, 1710-1755/2110-2155 MHz bands Grant Date Efteative Date Expiration Date Print Date 1.1-29-2006 11-29-2006 11-29-2021 1'-1-30-2006 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Mdrket Designator REA001- 0. O Market Name: Northeast 1 si Build-out Date 2nd.Build-outDate. 3rd Build-out Date 4th Build-out Date SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS This authorization is conditioned .Upon the licensee; prior to initiating operations from any base or fixed station, making reasonable efforts to coordinate frequency usage with known co channel and. adjacent channel incumbent federal :users operating in the T710-1755 MHz band whose facilities could. be affected dy the proposed operations-- See.,- e.g. , FCC and NTIA Coordination Procedures in the 1710-17`_5 MHz Banc, Pkt7lic Notice, FCC 06-50, WTB. Docket No, 02-353, rel . April '20, 2006. w _ y AWS Operations must not cause harmful interference across the Canadian or Mexican Border, The (-Special Conditions. or WaiversfEgnditlons"continued vn next page . . .) Conditions: t-w.�...-.- Pursuani to Section309(h) of'the Communications Act of 1934, ai amended, 47,U:S,C, Section 309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions:111111t ib Iffserntrall''ntthvest'inNte licensee any+fight to operate the station nor any right in tho use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the tsrm thereof`nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neitherihe license nor the fight granted fhereundershail be asiigrted or otherwise transferred in violation:ofthe Cafnmuniaatlohs Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C- Section 310(4). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control contorted by %ection of the Communications Act of 1934.This ended. See 47 U.S,C,Section 606. To view the geographic areas dssocldted With the license,go to the Universal Licensing System(ULS) homepage at http:(lwireless.fco.gov/uls and select%icellse Search". Follow the instructions on how tosearoh for license information. FCC, on:; , MF February 2006 Page 2 of 2 Licensee Name: MetroPCS AWS; LLC Cali Sign File Number Print Date WQGA731 0002773,870 11-30-2006 .Special Cvnpitions or Waivers/oondIt ions authority granted- herein is subject to future International agreements with Canada or Mexico,. as applicabie. .FCC 601 •MB 'i TOWER REINFORCEMENT DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS T-1 TITLE ST-1 FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT ELEVATION ST-2 HELICAL DETAILS ST-3 ANODE INSTALLATION ST-3.1 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ST-3.2 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ST-3.3 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. SITE LOCATION: 41815 MAIN ROAD - PECONIC,NY. 11958 SCOPE: THE PURPOSE OF THESE REINFORCING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS IS TO REINFORCE THE FOUNDATION. THE FOUNDATION IS BEING REINFORCED WITH HELICALS ON ALL THREE LEGS. REINFORCING INCLUDES: THE FOUNDATION IS BEING REINFORCED WITH HELICALS ON ALL THREE LEGS. THERE WILL BE 2 HELICALS PER LEG FOR A TOTAL OF 6. THIS REINFORCEMENT IS REQUIRED AFTER ANALYZING THE TOWER. REFER TO S,TSUaTU,RAk,.,.. ANALYSIS DATED DECEMBER 14TH, 2009 AND GEOTECAAFG'AL W 9b1L MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. DATED JANUARY 25, 2010, JOB NO. 10-040. I I OWNER CLIENT: REVISIONS: rM Consulting Engineers, Inc. MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. 5, Mdg-Db*bW gqW ft d Roja Tf ga Im M Ws JpW PonyRo Eft.NJ 098]8 ndc<�ar 1 j Ph": (808)5380100 Fac (509)5388858 FN.(rla av-m y APPROVALS 6 DATE: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: DATE: =DATE VLw UUUJJ SOUTHOLD DRAWING No.: _. S. C.: DATE: PROJECT ADDRE55. DATE' 41815 MAIN ROAD T�1 UCENSE U CONST.: DATE: PECONIG, NY. 1lg58 PROJECT A: SITE IDA DRAWING TITLE: PC. CWD. DRN DATE, 090507 � TITLE SHEET � MLB J5R 01/2q/10 NOTE: 4. CONTRACTOR TO BACK FILL HOLES AND RESTORE I. HELICAL TO BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY OR WITH COMPOUND TO EXISTING CONDITION. CONTRACTOR A V BATTER AWAY FROM EXISTING CONCRETE TO ADD DIRT AND SEED IT AS REQUIRED. BLOCK. ALSO BATTER HELICAL AWAY FROM EACH OTHER. 5. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE SHOWN HELICAL 2. HELICAL PILES ARE TO BE A MIN. OF 45' OR A ATTACHMENT TO FOUNDATION OR SUBMIT EQUAL. MAX. TORQUE OF 10400 FOOT POUNDS. 6. FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT BASED ON 3. 46" MIN. HILTI EPDXY BOLTS (NIT/HY 150/HI7 ICE GEOTECHNICAL. REPORT BY SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. JOB NUMBER 10-040 DATED 25TH ADHESIVE ANCHOR) WITH 6%` EMBEDMENT. (MIN. JANUARY, 2010, AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BY OF 16 PER PLATE). INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURE KM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. DATED 14TH INSTRUCTION. DECEMBER, 2009. EXISTING TOWER LEG 1TYP.1 17'-0' EXISTING v GRADE ` =1 I' aDI ^ II `SII f 1 3'_Oo II -III II Il SACRIFICIAL PROPOSED ANODE I• I �._ :• HELICAL PILES 12 PER LEG TYP.I •.• 2.00° SQUARE BAR WITH 14', 140, 120, la m I.°• . . 1011, 8" HELICES WITH A 1'BATTER t • i r i 3� CAISSON III.• � 4I II: . � 77� La.� LaJ QFOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT ELEV. - yam_ ST-1 SCALE: NTS l Consulting Engineers, Inc. alENr: MTM DQESm16aN�GRUP INC. REVISIONS: F 1_s MWe-DinapiiW F.l84rce VA Reis M.%m axpateuR=wo VWWU0 FsnYA Exin9.NJOB82B KM nnE Pd9 es-eno P (808)SW04DO Fu: (809)536EBY Fuc maw-a APPROVALS < DATE: PROJECT NAME: NO. DATE G - ' OWNER: DATE: r SOUTHOLD DRAWING No: .W�1� S.A.C.: DATE: �ROFE551G'�P 'N PROJECT ADDRESS: R PE R/ F.: DATE' 41815 MAIN ROAD ST�1 ISE 0 7PFAWEI s �� LICENSE CCNST.: DATE: PECONIC, NY. 11958 PROJECT #: SITE ID tt DRAWING TITLE. P C CNKD: DRN DATE. 090507 FOUND. REINFORCEMENT ELEV ❑ MLB JSR01/29/10 GRIND AND/OR LEVEL ATTACH COAT AREA ITH SIKATOP 125 PLUS OR EQUAL MINIMUM 46' HILTI 2'-0' EPDXY BOLTS (MIN. 16 PER PLATE) PROPOSED 2 1/2x2 1/20/2' vi PLATE FOR HELICAL PILE MOUNTING a 44 EXISTING CONCRETE MINIMUM 9W HILTI BLOCK 3' SQUARE x 3' DEEP EPDXY BOLTS (MIN. 16 PER PLATEII 4"N'CO 4 WELDS TYP. HELICAL PILE WITH --PROPOSED HELICAP EXPLORITORITY 102.5 KIP TENSION PILES I6 TYP.I EXCAVATION TRENCH CAPACITY (ULTIMATE), 104.9 KIP IN COMPRESSION, �1 HELICAL MOUNTING DETAIL (PLAN) TORQUE 15 10400 ST-2 SCALE: 3/04-0" MINIMUM 9(' HILTI SHAFT EXTENSION EPDXY BOLTS IMIN. 16 NOTE• PER PLATE) 2V,� INSTALLATION SHALL BE OBSERVED BY 3' e' QUALIFIED LICENSED ENGINEER FAMILIAR WITH HELICAL PILE INSTALLATION AND PHOTOGRAPHY/WRITTEN RECORD SUBMITTED TO MTM DESIGN GROUP. T0WELDS TYP. O O O O /5 ESTIMATED DEPTH BASE ON ASSUMED .o o PROPOSED 2 1/2x2 1/2x14" GEOTECHNICAL DATA to LATE FOR HELICAL PILE O O O MOUNTING o O O O 14-14-I2-10-8 BATTER 7 BATTER 7 COUNTER LEAD CLOCKWISE CLOCKWISE PROPOSED HELICAP PILES USE 2' SQUARE BAR FOR EASIER WELDING TO PLATE I6 TYR) CONTRACTOR TO PAINT PLATE AND WELD AREA OF HELICAL WITH 2 PART EPDXY/PAINT, AND AFTER DRYING, COAT WITH BITUMINOUS ROOF REPAIR COATING. 2 HELICAL MOUNTING DETAIL (ELEV) HELICAL DETAIL ST-2 SCALE: 3/0•1'-0" ST-2 SCALE: 3/8"•1'-0" " eo ✓ KR:sulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT' MTM DESIGN GROUP INC.i C. W1rJWade +�xaeP InMaga�. + ^ R\� 41 w UPw Fa R"a4 Exp,",Wr'y (WO)536M00 Fax (806)5956659 FK mUen-xxx, U.) APPROVALS 4 DATE: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: DATE: NO. DATE z \0 5OUTNOLD DRAWING No.: S.A.C.: DATE: ', 1, PROJECT ADDRESS: T /� MPE R/ F.: DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD ST•2 MW sE: ew6� CONST.: DATE: IFECONIC, NY. II0158 PROJECT # SITE ID #: DRAWING TITLE. P G CHKD. DRN DATE. Le 507 HELICAL DETAIL5 MLB JSR 01/2q/10 ANODE INSTALLATION WITH CADWELD CONNECTIONS TO HELICAL ANCHORS GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK THIS WORK CONSISTS OF FURNISHING ALL LABOR, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREPARATION AND INSTALLATION OF A CORROSION PROTECTION ANODE USING A CADWELD CONNECTION TO A STEEL FOUNDATION SUPPORT PRODUCT ACCORDING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN.THE WORK INCLUDES,BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO,THE FOLLOWING: 1. INSTALLING THE ANODE; 2. PREPARING THE AREA OF ELECTRICAL ATTACHMENT; 3. INSTALLING THE WIRE, SLEEVE, DISK, WELD METAL AND STARTING MATERIAL TO THE CADWELD MOLD; 4. WELDING THE ANODE WIRE TO THE PRODUCT REQUIRING CATHODIC PROTECTION; 5. CLEANUP DELIVERY,STORAGE AND HANDLING ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE HANDLED AND TRANSPORTED CAREFULLY TO PREVENT ANY DEFORMATION OR DAMAGE. THE MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED IN A COOL AND DRY LOCATION. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT THE ACCUMULATION OF DIRT OR FOREIGN MATTER ON THE MATERIALS. SUCH ACCUMULATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED PRIOR TO ANODE INSTALLATION AND CADWELDING. MATERIALS MAGNESIUM ANODE THE MAGNESIUM ANODE SHALL BE CAST OF ALLOY AZ63 TO PRODUCE AN OPEN CIRCUIT POTENTIAL OF 1.53 TO 1.55 VOLTS. THE ANODE SHALL BE CENTERED IN A COTTON BAG AND SURROUNDED WITH A MIXTURE OF 75% HYDRATED GYPSUM,20%BENTONITE AND 5%SODIUM SULFATE. THE LEAD WIRE SHALL BE SILVER SOLDERED TO THE CORE OF THE ANODE AND THEN FULLY SEALED AND INSULATED. THE LEAD WIRE SHALL BE A I O-FOOT LENGTH OF #12 TW INSULATED SOLID COPPER. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL SPECIFY ANODE WEIGHT FOLLOWING SOIL RESISTIVITY TESTING. CADWELD MOLD CADWELD MOLD IS USED TO ACCOMPLISH A PERMANENT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE ANODE AND THE FOUNDATION SUPPORT PRODUCT BEING PROTECTED FROM CORROSION (CATHODE). A SEMI- PERMANENT GRAPHITE MOLD SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL THE DIRECTION AND SPEED OF THE MOLTEN CADWELD METAL, AND THE FINAL SHAPE OF THE SOLIDIFIED WELD. MOLD CONFIGURATION IS RELATED TO THE SURFACE TO RECEIVE CADWELD AND TO CONDUCTOR SIZE. THE FOLLOWING MOLDS ARE DESIGNED TO ACCEPT FROM#14 TO#10 SOLID WIRE,#8 SOLID OR STRANDED WIRE,OR#6 SOLID WIRE. 3/4" TO 3-1/2" DIAMETER PIPES USE CAVSTAGA CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCORPORATED,OR EQUAL. 4" TO 10" DIAMETER PIPES USE CAVST-1GB CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCORPORATED,OR EQUAL. 12" & LARGER DIAMETER PIPES - FLAT SURFACES USE CAVSTAG CADWELD WELDER MOLD AS MANUFACTURED BY ERICO INCO RPORATED,OR EQUAL OWNER: Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT' MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS: - s� MrM-DveWS^^dE^8^��Sd Pm/ett Mm:agano:t alD�atBIAIE�w r C Ni �✓ \ Uww Upw Ferry ROW 5xkZ W08898 no 0�lY esR : (508)5380/00 Fac (809)6968&58 Fu mw_a APPROVALS It DATE: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: DATE: NO. DATE 1— �QGS 1 SOUTNOLD DRAWING No. S.A.G.: DATE: PROJECT ADDRESS: .L SON R i P.: DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD V\ I V{ u Nr OcNsT.: DATE: PECONIC, NY. IIg58 ROFES5�0 P�' PROJECT tt. SITE ID tt DRAWING TITLE: PC CHKD: ORIN DATE ^_oma, N Og0507 ANODE INSTALLATION ❑ MLB JSR OV yo CADWELD METAL CADWELD WELD METAL IS A MIXTURE OF COPPER OXIDE AND ALUMINUM, PACKAGED IN PLASTIC TUBES. EACH TUBE CONTAINS THE STARTING POWDER AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PLASTIC TUBE, WITH THE WELD METAL ON THE TOP. THE CONTAINERS ARE PACKAGED WITH METAL DISKS IN BOXES OF 20. THE CADWELD METAL CAN BE HANDLED AND STORED WITHOUT DANGER OF SPONTANEOUS IGNITION. BOXES MAY BE SHIPPED WITHOUT SPECIAL PACKAGING OR MARKING. ERICO CA15 WITH F-33 ALLOY, OR EQUAL, SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTIONS OF CABLE TO STEEL,CABLE TO STAINLESS STEEL,OR CABLE TO CABLE. CABLE SLEEVE A TUBULAR METAL SLEEVE IS REQUIRED OVER THE #12 WIRE THAT IS SUPPLIED WITH THE ANODES TO PREVENT LOSS OF MOLTEN MATERIAL DURING THE WELDING PROCESS. THE SLEEVE IS INSTALLED OVER THE WIRE PRIOR TO INSERTION INTO THE MOLD. ERICO CAB133-I1-1,OR EQUAL. EXECUTION ANODE BAG INSTALLATION THE SPECIFIED SIZE AND TYPE OF ANODE SHALL BE INSTALLED NEAR THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT(S) REQUIRING CATHODIC CORROSION PROTECTION.EACH ANODE SHALL BE PLACED IN A SEPARATE EXCAVATION AND POSITIONED AT AN ELEVATION BELOW THE ANTICIPATED POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT AT A DISTANCE BETWEEN 3 AND 10 FEET FROM THE FOUNDATION PRODUCT. WELD LOCATION THE ATTACHMENT POINT SHALL BE TO THE ANCHOR SHAFT AS CLOSE TO THE TOP PIER PLATFORM,PILE CAP OR ANCHOR TRANSITION AS PRACTICAL. SURFACE PREPARATION THE POINT OF ATTACHMENT ON THE PILE SHAFT SHALL BE CLEANED TO BARE METAL BY REMOVING OIL,DIRT, RUST,GALVANIZING AND/OR PAINT ONLY IN THE AREA THAT WILL DIRECTLY RECEIVE THE WELD.THIS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY FILING, GRINDING OR ROTARY WIRE BRUSHING THE AREA. AFTER CLEANING, PROVIDE REFERENCE MARK TO AID IN ALIGNING MOLD TO SHAFT. CAUTION: FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, PAYING PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO ANY PRODUCT WARNINGS. WELDING REQUIRES A RAPID BURNING OF A STARTING POWDER THAT CREATES INTENSE HEAT.IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE PERSON PERFORMING THE WELDING USE ALL RECOMMENDED SAFETY DEVICES. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMEND-ATION AND TO WEAR PROPER PROTECTIVE DEVICES COULD RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY! WELDING SELECTING THE MOLD SELECT THE PROPER SIZE MOLD FOR THE APPLICATION. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE MOLD FIT PROPERLY TO THE CURVATURE OF THE SHAFT. BEFORE THE FIRST CONNECTION OF THE DAY, DRY THE MOLD AND WARM IT USING A TORCH TO APPROXIMATELY 2500 F. INSTALL ANODE WIRE INSPECT THE WIRE TO BE SURE THAT THE CONDUCTOR IS CLEAN, DRY AND NOT DEFORMED. BENT OR DEFORMED CABLE MAY HOLD THE MOLD OPEN OR LEAK INSTALL A CAB133-IH METAL SLEEVE OVER THE BARE #12 WIRE LEADING TO THE ANODE. ALLOW THE CONDUCTOR TO PROTRUDE 1/8 INCH BEYOND THE SLEEVE. POSITION THE WIRE AND SLEEVE IN THE WIRE SLOT IN THE MOLD ADJACENT TO THE WELD CAVITY. CLOSE THE MOLD AND LOCK TIGHTLY. owNER r 6 Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT: MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS: 32 Want UpW FangR EVh&NJ 8828 R Oaa/w ro Ph". (808)5389100 Fac (WO)5394M pw<mw-. A?PROVALS 6 DATE: PROJECT NAME: (1y`7)!`'I\M�u,. NO. DATE !U) OWNER: DATE: ( SOUTHOLD DRAWING NO. DATE: PROJECT ADDRE55. R i F..-DATE` 41815 MAIN ROAD LICE ,CNS' CONST.: DATE: PECONIC, NY. 11958 PROJECT tt. SITE ID tt. DRAWING TITLE: P.C. C4KD DRN DATE: Y`' Og0507 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. MLB JSR 01/29/10 INSTALL ANODE WIRE INSPECT THE WIRE TO BE SURE THAT THE CONDUCTOR IS CLEAN, DRY AND NOT DEFORMED. BENT OR DEFORMED CABLE MAY HOLD THE MOLD OPEN OR LEAK. INSTALL A CAB133-1H METAL SLEEVE OVER THE BARE #12 WIRE LEADING TO THE ANODE. ALLOW THE CONDUCTOR TO PROTRUDE 1/8 INCH BEYOND THE SLEEVE. POSITION THE WIRE AND SLEEVE IN THE WIRE SLOT IN THE MOLD ADJACENT TO THE WELD CAVITY. CLOSE THE MOLD AND LOCK TIGHTLY. INSTALL CADWELD METAL INSERT ONE METAL DISK PACKAGED WITH THE CADWELD METAL INTO THE BOTTOM OF THE CHAMBER. OPEN ONE PLASTIC TUBE CONTAINING THE WELDING METAL AND STARTING POWDER. CAREFULLY INSTALL THE LOOSE WELDING METAL ON TOP OF THE METAL DISK IN THE CHAMBER. PACKAGED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PLASTIC TUBE IS THE STARTING POWDER.CAREFULLY REMOVE THE STARTING POWDER FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE TUBE AND PLACE THE POWDER ON TOP OF THE WELDING METAL.AS AN AID IN IGNITION,ALLOW A SMALL AMOUNT OF STARTING POWDER TO REST ON THE TOP OF THE MOLD NEAR THE IGNITION PORT. CLOSE THE TOP OF THE MOLD. IGNITION AND WELDING PLACE THE MOLD AGAINST SHAFT, CAREFULLY ALIGNING THE MOLD TO THE REFERENCE MARK(S) ON THE SHAFT. WEARING GLOVES AND EYE PROTECTION, CAREFULLY ALIGN THE MOLD AGAINST THE SHAFT DIRECTLY OVER THE AREA THAT WAS PREPARED TO ACCEPT THE CADWELD. APPLY PRESSURE AGAINST THE MOLD TO INSURE CONTACT WHILE IGNITING THE STARTING POWDER USING AN APPROVED IGNITION DEVICE THAT IS SUPPLIED WITH THE MOLD.CONTINUE TO HOLD THE MOLD AGAINST THE SHAFT FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 SECONDS FOLLOWING IGNITION TO INSURE THAT THE MOLTEN METAL HAS SOLIDIFIED. WARNING: 1. WEAR PROTECTIVE CLOTHING,EYE PROTECTION AND GLOVES WHILE WELDING. 2. PERSONNEL SHOULD BE PROPERLY TRAINED IN THE USE OF THESE PRODUCTS. 3. MAKE SURE THAT THE PROPER MOLD IS USED TO FIT THE DIAMETER OF THE SHAFT. 4. DO NOT USE WORN OR BROKEN EQUIPMENT,WHICH COULD CAUSE LEAKAGE. 5. DO NOT ALTER OR MODIFY EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS. 6. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE WELD MATERIALS. 7. AVOID MOISTURE AND CONTAMINANTS IN THE MOLD AND WELD MATERIALS. 8. AVOID EYE CONTACT WITH THE "FLASH" OF LIGHT FROM THE IGNITION OF THE STARTING MATERIAL. 9. AVOID BREATHING CONCENTRATIONS OF SMOKE, AS IT MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH. 10. PROVIDE ADEQUATE VENTILATION WHERE NATURAL AIRFLOW IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT PERSONNEL FROM BREATHING CONCENTRATIONS OF SMOKE. 11. AVOID CONTACT WITH HOT MATERIALS. 12. ADVISE NEARBY PERSONNEL OF WELDING IN THE AREA. 13. PROTECT THE IMMEDIATE AREA FROM FIRE HAZARDS. 14. DO NOT SMOKE. MOLD REMOVAL AND INSPECTION OPEN THE MOLD AND REMOVE THE MOLD FROM THE SHAFT.CAREFULLY INSPECT THE WELD TO ENSURE THAT ALL OF THE CADWELD METAL WAS PROPERLY FORMED AROUND THE WIRE, SLEEVE AND SHAFT. THE WELD SHOULD BE UNIFORM AND FULLY PENETRATE ALL AREAS. IF THE WELD IS NOT PERFECT,REPEAT THE WELD IN AN ADJACENT AREA. KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT: MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS: 'Vda'-fNi'1➢�nNEte�keinBd H^IretAlawBa:w� 9a�nl MEa�r UWW UppW Furyr EwWg,Waeau Hcumwom1 Phrcr: 6980100 Fac PXGD tAU Y1-N4 [WO1 (BC8)599-9959 FA4 fTy)W-lN1 APPROVALS 6 DATE: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: DATE: N0. DATE ,f11I11.^,"AIJrO`(� 5OUTNOLD RAKING No.: A PROJECT ADDRESS: T 4 �f pE R/ F.: DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD 1 -J,L vEN - On CONST.: DATE: PECONIC, NY. Ilg58 PROJECT tt: SITE ID tt DRAWING TITLE. PC: CNKD DRN DATE: ti Og0507 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. ❑ MLB JSR 01/2g/10 CORROSION PROTECTION OF WELDED AREA AFTER THE WELDED AREA HAS COOLED,THE WELD,SLEEVE,WIRE AND BARE METAL ON THE SHAFT SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST CORROSION USING ANY RECOGNIZED PRODUCTS DESIGNED FOR COLD APPLICATION CORROSION PROTECTION,SUCH AS ZINC RICH PAINT(ZRC),COLD TAR EPDXY,ETC.THE ENTIRE AREA SHALL BE COATED WITH AT LEAST THREE COATS AND CAREFULLY INSPECTED TO SEE THAT THERE ARE NO GAPS,VOIDS OR THINLY COATED AREAS. CLEAN-UP REMOVE SLAG AND DUST FROM THE MOLD WITH A CLEAN RAG, PAINT BRUSH OR MOLD CLEANING TOOL. DO NOT USE A WIRE BRUSH.BACKFILL AROUND THE SHAFT AND ANODE USING SOIL THAT WAS REMOVED DURING THE EXCAVATION. DO NOT BACKFILL WITH A MATERIAL FOREIGN TO THE SITE. LEAVE THE AREA CLEAN AND FREE OF DEBRIS.GRADE FOR PROPER DRAINAGE. o 1 +" Consulting Engineers, Inc. CLIENT MTM DESIGN GROUP INC. REVISIONS: MdOD..pbfdErgwm6g 4 pmjWMmpga aalxq}art5 � W WW UpW Fe"ROW EwV,Wo95ze mors ac�w Ph": (809)5380100 Fa (809)5988058 wcfnxl w-tlM � ( P APPROVALS 6 DATE: PROJECT NAME: G NO. DATE ,�% OWNER: DATE: SOUTHOLD oRAwINa No.. ROFESSIUNP�'� 5.A.C.: DATE: PROJECT ADDRESS: T 4 4 MICHAEL L R i P.: DATE: 41815 MAIN ROAD UCENSE 07sT00, NYCONST: DATE: PECONIC, NY. 11958 PROJEC` ><: SITE ID . DRAWING TITLE. P C CHKD DRN DATE 090507 ANODE INSTALLATION CONT. MLB JSR 01/29/10 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT for MTM Southold Police Station .. ,-rs•..mn.ueuµ,, NY7315 � MTM No. 09MPSTS008 KMCE Project No.: 090507.00 130 Ft. Self-Supported Triangular Tower Southold, New York _ -- Prepared By: CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 32 West Upper Ferry Rd, Ewing, NJ 08628 Ph: (609) 538-0400 Fax: (609) 538-8858 July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 - Dec. 14, 2009) Prepared to TIAIEIA-222-F June 1996 Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................3 2.0 TOWER INVENTORY................................................................................................4 3.0 COMMENTARY..........................................................................................................5 4.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE .........................................................................................6 5.0 TOWER ANALYSIS RESULTS .................................................................................7 5.1 FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................8 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................9 7.0 APPENDIX...............................................................................................................10 Load Case No. 1: Existing Conditions w/proposed MetroPCS antenna and coax MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Structure Owner/Manager: Southold Police Department Location: Southold Police Station 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY Manufacturer: Forth Worth Tower Equipment Existing tower inventory and the proposed installed equipment are detailed in Section 2.0 "Tower Inventory." Synopsis The existing tower superstructure with the installation of proposed equipment will meet current TIA standards. Load Case No. 1: The existing tower superstructure with the addition of(6) antenna and (12) cables. The foundation is at 216% which does not meet the present standards. The tower is 91.9% -End of Executive Summary- 3 • MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) 2.0 TOWER INVENTORY DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION Beacon 130 17 Senor Mound(Ven zon) IDD Super Stationmaster 130 17 Sector Mound(Ver¢=) 100 (3)7262.02(ATS) 130 (3)ALP-E-9011 (Verizon) 100 (3)DB810E IS'Whip Antenna 130 (3)ALP-E-9011 (Verizon) IDD (6)Cehratne panel 7z3(A10) 130 20'Who Antenna 100 6'Side Moor Standoff(1)(ATE) 130 T VHF D8 prod Yagi 91 6'Side Mount Standoff(1)(ATI) 130 (2)Kattreto 800 10504(Mekopcs) 90 6'Side Mont Standoff(1)(ATS) 130 (2)Ka t m 800 10504(MeVq=) 9D (12)RR65-1 B-XXDPL2 on Seder 115 Generic Side Arm Mont(Metropcs) 90 Mounts(T-Mobile) Generic Side Arm Marg(Metrapcs) 90 (2)20'Who Antenna 100 Geneve Side Arm Mont(Mdmpcs) 90 GPS vd Stand-off Amt 100 (2)Kattreur 800 10504(MeMvm) 90 (2)20'Who Antenna 100 standoff mamt(4') 38 (3)ALP-E-9011 (Venzon) 100 6'UHF Who Antenna(4'offset)) 138 17 Seder Mout(Verizon) 100 (6) antenna @ 90' AGL. 4 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) 3.0 COMMENTARY Our scope of work is to determine if the existing structure is capable of withstanding additional stresses/forces imposed by the installation of the proposed equipment noted in the tower inventory. Tower drawings were not available. Information obtained from a tower climb were utilized in this analysis. All members were assumed to be installed as per manufacturers specifications and are in like-new condition. Foundation drawings were also not available. KMCEpreviously conducted non-destructive investigation to determine the size of foundation.The findings were utilized in this analysis. The following report will provide analytical calculations and commentary regarding the capacity of the existing tower and subsequent recommendations. 5 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) 4.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. carried out their structural analysis by correlating field inspection and tower member data into proprietary software designed specifically for communication tower analysis. These programs run in conjunction with the guidelines set down in the TIA/EIA-222-F June 1996 Standard entitled "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures." The existing tower is analyzed by placing wind forces on the structure in 300 positional increments around the tower(ie. wind pressure directly onto the tower corners, faces and parallel to the faces). This enables the user to"create"a three-dimensional representation, yielding results for worst case scenarios. In effect, the production of these results allows the user to study the structural integrity of the tower when influenced by wind forces from any direction. The proceeding report includes analysis for the tower with the addition of antenna in the scenarios stated. For clarity, the analysis shall include worst case loadings and a typical elevation view with maximum foundation loads tabulated. Should the client require to be furnished with a full copy of our analysis, we will gladly do so. Codes and Standards ACI - American Concrete Institute - Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (AC/ 318-95), 1995 AISC-American Institute of Steel Construction -Manual of Steel Design, Allowable Stress Design, 9'" edition, 1989 TIA - Telecommunications Industry Association - TIAIEIA-222-F Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, 1996 IBC 2006 6 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) 5.0 TOWER ANALYSIS RESULTS The tower was analyzed for the existing inventory plus the proposed loading condition. Structural wind speed and ice loads are in accordance with the TIA/EIA-222-F Code. The applicable design values for Suffolk County, New York is: 85 MPH, with no ice applied to the tower members and 74 MPH, '/2" radial ice applied to the tower members. For Load Case 1, Section Capacity Tables indicating the allowable member and connection capacities are included in the Appendix. All allowable capacities have been calculated to comply with the permitted TIA allowable increases (for wind). All bolts loaded in shear assume the threads are included in the shear plane. Load Case No. 1: The existing tower superstructure with addition of(6) antenna, (12) coax will meet current EIA/TIA design standards. The tower is 91.9%. However, the foundation is a 216%. See included "Section Capacity Tables." 7 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) 5.1 FOUNDATIONS The loads generated from the analysis were compared to the calculated foundation capacity. Foundation capacity was determined by KMCE using non-destructive testing. For details of test refer to foundation report provided by KMCE. KMCE determined the foundations to be T-0"diameter drilled shafts, 18'-6"from the top of concrete to bottom of concrete, with belled areas. Using these dimensions and conservative soil values, KMCE determined that the existing foundation will not adequately support the proposed installation. From our October 2003 foundation investigation, we have assigned a conservative value of 180 K in uplift for this foundation. The present reaction is 195 K which must have a SF of 2 or 390 K. Therefore the foundation is at 216%. 8 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev 1 - Dec. 14, 2009) 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Further to our calculations, we conclude that the tower superstructure with the proposed installation and subsequent equipment conforms to current design standard. The foundation lacks adequate capacity to meet the current design standard. We recommend that a geotechnical investigation be performed and that a design for reinforcing the foundation be conducted. This report was prepared from tower climb inventory and assumes that the tower was assembled per the manufacturer's specifications and that the tower members and connections are in like new condition. Please do not hesitate to contact or office with any questions or concerns regarding this report. Prepared By: A ' &r Michael L. Bohlinger, PE Principal NY License No. 075700 9 LOAD CASE No. 1 DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING 130c ft TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION Basoon 130 1Zseddr Mount(vwaon) 100 super sullonmeder 130 lzsedor Moum(vedoon) 100 �f (3)]262.02-(ATI) 130 (3)ALP-E-Wli NeKon) 10D (3)D8610E 15'Mip Antenna 130 (3)ALP-E-8011(VeiRon) 100 (6)Celwa o,panel 2'4'(ATT) 130 20'Mop M orna 1X0 q n 6'side Mount Sandoll(1)(ATT) 130 ]'VHF DB pmE Yogi 91 N 6'eMe1dwMSondolf(1)(ATI) 130 (2)KNOroln 60010 (Movopoo) So a Sae Mount Sundda(1)(ATp 130 (2)KaOreln 80010504(Mebopu) So (12)RM6-16%XDPL2 on Setlw 115 Geneft Side Arm Mount(Mstmpre) 90 Mounts(r-Mobile) Garodc Side Nm Mount 110on 12)2D'wn�p Amenne Ja (M@oo�) N canadc sae Mn Mount(Mebopu) so �. OP6 w/3Mn6o11Ami 2)Kamnln 6001050/(Mdmu) W (?wmipAntenna landoff mount(4) 36 (3)ALP-E-9011(Vedzon) 'UHF wmip Antenna(1'oax0 3B 12'SMwMount(Verizon) MATERIAL STRENGTH GRADE F Fu GRADE Fu A672.50 so"i 165 Mi A98 Wool S6 kel X 11113 1 C 900" 111 TOWER DESIGN NOTES �+ 1. Tower is located in Suffolk County,New York. X 2. Tower designed for a 85 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA/EIA-222-F Standard. 3. Tower is also designed for a 74 mph basic wind with 0.50 in ice. �I 4. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind. c 5. TOWER RATING:91.9% ]0.06 II o W.0 ft f 11 N MAX.CORNER REACTIONS Al BASE. 'l DOWN: 240K UPLIFT.. -195K 3605 SHEAR: 27K - � AXIAL 55K O 0 I ,_1 SHE MOMENT 43 K 3256 kip-ft TORQUE 7 kip-ft 74 mph WWD-0.5000 in ICE looft AXIAL 36K MOMENT c ' SHE 3362 kip-ft e 45 K 0.0 s TORQUE 9 Rlp-ft REACTIONS-85 mph WIND . 3 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc. Southoid Police Station 32 West Upper Ferry Road Proi"`Pro osedMafro caLoadin -LC 1 Rev Ewing, NJ. 08628 alem: MTM own by:Us., App'd: Phone:(609)538-0400 C0tl0 TIAIEIA-222-F ':1 J14109 sole: NTS FAX: 809 538-8858 Pa01 x. ,a 1 Fee WpNo.E-1 TIA/EIA-222-F-85 mph/74 mph 0.5000 in Ice Leg Capacity I Leg Compression (K) 1000 500 <-Minimum 0 Miunum-> -500 AM 130. 130.00 110 Gow 90.0 I 70. 000 0 Y I 7 d W 50. 30. 10A _ 10'0 O.X W 1000 500 <-Mlnlmum OMaumum-> -500 -1000 %M Consulting Engineers,Inc. Southold Police Station 32 West Upper Ferry RoadPm au:Pro osed!f" LoadU -�c f Rev Ewing, NJ.08628 den MTM o"mbY:User APO: Phone:(809)538-0400 C—d TIA/EIA-222-F o"'*!12/14109 �"1 NTS FAX:(6091538-8858 Pem'xMRM 1 n..v..x oa9 No.E-3 • Feedline Distribution Chart • 0' - 130' Round FIM App In Face App Out Faoe hues Lep ,30oo Face A Face B Face C 130.00 _ 115.00 115.00 110.00 _ _ 11000 100.00 100.00 Alm Al On 90.00 90.00 00.00 --- ---- -------- --- ..90.00 m $Q ym ' 70.00 S -+ @ ] 7000 v C Y Z ' t W N v � c 5000 O B w m n @. 50.00 rO�X S 3B.W 35.00 30.00 _30.00 10.00 1000 10.00 10.00 0.00 000 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc. Southold Police Station 32 West Upper Ferry Road P AIW:Pro ad Marro LoadM -LC IR Ewing, NJ.08628 Cl* MTM 0••^�User App'° Phone:(809)538-0400 000:TIA/EIA-222-F Da1s 12/14/09 NTS FAX: 809 538-8858 peN.y, 1• • Stress Distribution Chart • 0' - 130' • '> 100% 90%-100°/a': 75%-90%,50%-75%'<50%Overstress 3°ao Face A Face B Face C ,30.00 I II 11000 I� �. V / I l � r � / i u 90.00 i \ 90.00, I � I 70.00 - �� 70 N 0 w i m w 50.00 50.00 30.00 .�____ 30.00 Z>I v ,9.00 i ��� ��� ,9.00 oao 9A0 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc.IN:Southold Police Station 32 West Upper Ferry Road P00d Pro ed Mebo Loadln -LC 1 Rev Ewing, NJ.08628 O°°"t MTM D1wn°r'user Aoo'tl: Phone:(609)5384400 CoOe: 71AIEIA-222-F D°':12/14/09 1$CB1e: NTS FAX: 608 538-8858 RISA Tower Job Page Southold Police Station 25 of 26 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc Project Date 32 West Upper Ferry Road Proposed Metropcs Loading -LC 1 Rev F 14:29:56 12/14/09 Ewing,NJ.08628 Client Designed by Phone:(609)538-0400 MTM User FAX:(609)538-8858 Section Elevation Size L L. KI1r Fa A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P Pe P ft ft ft ksi in' K K Po T2 110-90 L21/2x21/2z3/16 10.14 5.10 78.6 29.000 0.5710 6.17 16.56 0.373 ✓ T3 90-70 L3x3x3/16 11.73 5.89 75.3 29.000 0.7120 6.86 20.65 0.332 ✓ T4 70-50 L3x3x3/16 13.43 6.71 85.8 29,000 0.7120 7.49 20.65 0.363 TS 50-30 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 8.59 8.39 129.4 29.000 1.1391 9.17 33.03 0.278 ✓ T6 30-10 2L21/2x21/2x3/I6 9.42 9.23 142.3 29.000 1.1391 9.68 33.03 0.293 ✓ T7 10-0 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 9.42 9.21 142.1 29.000 1.1391 9.44 33.03 0.286 ✓ Horizontal Design Data Tension Section Elevation Size L L. KUr F. A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P P. P ft ft ft ksi in' K K Po T5 50-30 L21/2x21/2x3/16 13.50 13.17 203.1 21.600 0.9020 0.68 19.48 0.035 ✓ T6 30-10 L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 15.50 15.17 234.0 21.600 0.9020 0.65 19.48 0.033 ✓ T7 10-0 L21/2x21/2x3/l6 16.50 16.15 249.1 21.600 0.9020 0.25 19.48 0.013 ✓ Top Girt Design Data Tension Section Elevation Size L L. KUr F A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P P. P ft ft ft ksi in' K K Pa TI 130-110 L21/2x21/2x3/16 4.01 3.76 58.0 21.600 0.9020 0.42 19.48 0.022 ✓ Section Capacity Table Section Elevation Component Size Critical P SF-P,,_ % Pass No. ft Type Element K K Capacity Fail TI 130-110 Leg 3 1 -19.72 179.52 11.0 Pass Diagonal L21/2x21/2x3/l6 8 -4.18 16.76 24.9 Pass 50.3(b) Top Girt L21/2x21/2x3/16 6 -0.44 16.92 2.6 Pass T2 110-90 Leg 3 1/2 32 -54.00 213.90 25.2 pass Diagonal L21/2x21/2x3/16 34 -6.21 11.73 52.9 Pass 753(b) RISA Tower Job Southold Police Station Page 26 of 26 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc Project Date 31 West Upper Ferry Road Proposed Metropcs Loading- LC 1 Rev F 14:29:56 12/14/09 Ewing,NJ 08618 client Designed by Phone.:(609)538-0400 MTM User FAX(609)538-8858 Section Elevation Component Size Critical P SF•P,m % Pass No. ft Type Element K K Capacity Fail T3 90-70 Leg 3 1/2 53 -94.97 213.90 44.4 Pass 46.9(b) Diagonal L3x3x3/16 55 -6.91 15.12 45.7 Pass 84.1(b) T4 70-50 Leg 4 74 -136.01 319.15 42.6 Pass 79.8(b) Diagonal L3x3x3/16 76 -7.50 11.88 63.1 Pass 91.9(b) TS 50-30 Leg 4 95 -173.09 380.97 45.4 Pass 76.8(b) Diagonal 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 98 -9.27 21.41 43.3 Pass 56.2(b) Horizontal L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 97 -0.69 4.35 15.9 Pass T6 30-10 Leg 4 128 -212.49 380.97 55.8 Pass Diagonal 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 131 -9.77 17.69 55.3 Pass 59.3(b) Horizontal L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 130 -0.63 3.28 19.2 Pass T7 10-0 Leg 41/4 161 -231.10 441.99 52.3 Pass Diagonal 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 165 -9.75 16.22 60.1 Pass Horizontal L2 1/2x2 l/2x3/16 169 -0.22 2.89 76 Pass Summary Leg(T4) 79.8 Pass Diagonal 91.9 Pass (T4) Horizontal 19.2 Pass (T6) Top Girt 2.6 Pass (TI) Bolt Checks 91.9 Pass RATING= 91.9 Pass Program Version 5.3.1.0-10/3/2008 Fite:X:/MTM/Southold/Engineering/Southold LCI Rev Fen STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT for MTM Southold Police Station NY7315 MTM No. 09MPSTS008 KMCE Project No.: 090507.00 130 Ft. Self-Supported Triangular Tower Southold, New York Prepared By: CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Ph: (609) 538-0400 Fax: (609) 538-8858 July 8, 2009 Prepared to TIA/EIA-222-F June 1996 Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................3 2.0 TOWER INVENTORY................................................................................................4 3.0 COMMENTARY..........................................................................................................5 4.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE .........................................................................................6 5.0 TOWER ANALYSIS RESULTS .................................................................................7 5.1 FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................8 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................9 7.0 APPENDIX...............................................................................................................10 Load Case No. 1: Existing Conditions w/proposed MetroPCS antenna and coax MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Structure Owner/Manager: Southold Police Department Location: Southold Police Station 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY Manufacturer: Forth Worth Tower Equipment Existing tower inventory and the proposed installed equipment are detailed in Section 2.0 "Tower Inventory." Synopsis The existing tower superstructure with the installation of proposed equipment will meet current TIA standards. Load Case No. 1: The existing tower superstructure with the addition of(6) antenna and (12) cables. The foundation is adequate. The tower is 81.2% -End of Executive Summary- 3 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 2.0 TOWER INVENTORY DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION Beacon 130 (3)ALP-E-9011(Varian) 100 Super SUMOrNnesisr 130 T VHF DB prod Yap 91 (3)7262.02(ATS) 130 (2)K&~ 900 10504 90 (3)D8810E 15'Whip A denro 130 (Metwe) 6)Cehwave panel 7x3'(AU) 130 (2)Kaftan 80010504 90 6'Side Moud SwndoR(1)(ATS) 130 (medoPa) Kafte6'Side Mount St~(1)(ATS) 130 (2)(Mebopcs�)) 80010504 90 G Side Mood Standoff(1)(AII) 130 Cmwk SWe Arm MauO 90 2(rWhipAarkrne 100 mopes) (2)20'Whp Anieme 100 Generic Side Arte Mount 90 GPS wl St&V-M Arm 100 (Me40pce) (2)20'Whip Anierm 100 Gwmdc Side Arm Mane 90 (3)ALP-E-9011 (Verimn) 100 (MelroPp) 1z Sector Mart(verlaon) lioo 8'UHF Whip Anrorea 4'affieq 38 iz Sector Mount erimn) 100 d~wee(47 38 iz Sector Loud Norman) 100 (3)ALP-E-9011(Varmon) 1100 (6) antenna @ 90' AGL. 4 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 3.0 COMMENTARY Our scope of work is to determine if the existing structure is capable of withstanding additional stresses/forces imposed by the installation of the proposed equipment noted in the tower inventory. Tower drawings were not available. Information obtained from a tower climb were utilized in this analysis. All members were assumed to be installed as per manufacturers specifications and are in like-new condition. Foundation drawings were also not available. KMCEpreviously conducted non-destructive investigation to determine the size of foundation.The findings were utilized in this analysis. The following report will provide analytical calculations and commentary regarding the capacity of the existing tower and subsequent recommendations. 5 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 4.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. carried out their structural analysis by correlating field inspection and tower member data into proprietary software designed specifically for communication tower analysis. These programs run in conjunction with the guidelines set down in the TIA/EIA-222-F June 1996 Standard entitled "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures." The existing tower is analyzed by placing wind forces on the structure in 300 positional increments around the tower(ie. wind pressure directly onto the tower corners, faces and parallel to the faces). This enables the user to"create"a three-dimensional representation, yielding results for worst case scenarios. In effect, the production of these results allows the user to study the structural integrity of the tower when influenced by wind forces from any direction. The proceeding report includes analysis for the tower with the addition of antenna in the scenarios stated. For clarity, the analysis shall include worst case loadings and a typical elevation view with maximum foundation loads tabulated. Should the client require to be furnished with a full copy of our analysis, we will gladly do so. Codes and Standards ACI - American Concrete Institute - Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-95), 1995 AISC-American Institute of Steel Construction-Manual of Steel Design, Allowable Stress Design, 9'" edition, 1989 TIA - Telecommunications Industry Association - TIAIEIA-222-F Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, 1996 IBC 2006 6 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 5.0 TOWER ANALYSIS RESULTS The tower was analyzed for the existing inventory plus the proposed loading condition. Structural wind speed and ice loads are in accordance with the TIA/EIA-222-F Code. The applicable design values for Suffolk County, New York is: 85 MPH, with no ice applied to the tower members and 74 MPH, 1/2" radial ice applied to the tower members. For Load Case 1, Section Capacity Tables indicating the allowable member and connection capacities are included in the Appendix. All allowable capacities have been calculated to comply with the permitted TIA allowable increases (for wind). All bolts loaded in shear assume the threads are included in the shear plane. Load Case No. 1: The existing tower superstructure with addition of (6) antenna, (12) coax and foundations will meet current EIA/TIA design standards. See included "Section Capacity Tables." 7 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 5.1 FOUNDATIONS The loads generated from the analysis were compared to the calculated foundation capacity. Foundation capacity was determined by KMCE using non-destructive testing. For details of test refer to foundation report provided by KMCE. KMCE determined the foundations to be T-13"diameter drilled shafts, 18'-6"from the top of concrete to bottom of concrete, with belled areas. Using these dimensions and conservative soil values, KMCE determined that the existing foundation will adequately support the proposed installation. It should be noted that prior to further/future loads being added to the tower a geotechnical investigation should be obtained. 8 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Further to our calculations, we conclude that the tower superstructure with the proposed installation and subsequent equipment conforms to current design standard. This report was prepared from tower climb inventory and assumes that the tower was assembled per the manufacturer's specifications and that the tower members and connections are in like new condition. Please do not hesitate to contact or office with any questions or concerns regarding this report. Prepared By: r`' &r Michael L. Bohlinger, PE Principal NY License No. 075700 9 LOAD CASE No. 1 DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING 1w.on TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION Behan in (3)AIP-E-0011 NeraM) 100 Super SMBonmaeler in TVHFDBpM Yegi 81 F (3)7282.02(ATT) 130 (2)KM eel.0001050/ 90 m (3)DB81M 15'Me AMMM 130 (`1awPoe) (0)GN..Wel YGi'(ATI) 130 (Mewpra)n 00010501 00 F m, 8-We Mount Slsn (1)(ATT) 130 q 0'Side Mowll Standon(1)(ATT) 130 (2)KMM1roIn BD010601 90 iic S m 8'SMB Mound SlandOR(1)(AM 130 Gei 20 WMp Mlenne 100 ( neMMMWe) Mm Mount W m �aJ (2)20'wTIp AManne 100 Generic Side A,m MMM BO GP9 v/SWEaRMn 100 (MN,epca) (2)20'1MMp MIenm IN Generic Side MMMounl 00 (3)A -E.9011(Veilson) 100 R4etmpOe) 1SSetlor MouMNadeon) 100 8'UHFwMp Mnanna(LOMee 30 12'Setlor Mount Nenxon) 100 arandoff.M(41 38 1TSetlor MouMNedron) 100 C (3)A IE 9011(VeMOn) 100 oil MATERIAL STRENGTH FGRAOEJ FY Fu 1 GRADE 1 F Fu AM-50 W wl 65 wl MS 38"1 SB wl i eo.on I TOWER DESIGN NOTES 1. Tower designed for a 85 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA/EIA-222-F 1 Standard. p a 2. Tower is also designed for a 74 mph basic wind with 0.50 in ice. 3. Deflections are based upon a 50 mph wind. -.� 4. TOWER RATING:81.2% 70.0n .-. �t z \I Y MAX.CORNER REACTIONS ATBASE. I DOWN: 209 K UPLIFT: -166K E W.0 n � IIS SHEAR: 23 K G AXIAL 53K C N kip-11 D 37KA 2743 kip- TORQUE 7 kip-ft 74 mph WIND-0.5000 in ICE toort ` .1 AXIAL /35ITKK MOMENT SHE \ 2640 kip-if tl A 36 K T�� ,���,,, i TORQUE 10 kip-ft £ E REACTIONS-85 mph WIND _ f : 3 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc. Southold Police Station 32 West Upper Ferry Road ftjed:Pro osed MWo Loads -Lc 9 Ewing, NJ 08628 cIMM: MTM Da" b`MLB Apv'd: Phone:609.538.0400 Co°°' TIA/EIA-222-F 4 :07/08/09 Bella: NTS FAX:609.538.8858 Fan` Dr9 HO.E-1 TIA/EIA-222-F-85 mph/74 mph 0.5000 in Ice Leg Capacity Leg Compression (K) 1000 500 <.Minimum 0 MWmum > -500 -1000 90. 190_00 110A Al 11000 W 00. 1 _ 70.a 70.0D C 0 R d W W.130 .00 10. __ . ___ 10.00 0. 00 1000 300 <-Minlmumom.lmum-> 300 -1000 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc. Southold Police Statlon 32 West Upper Ferry Road P`0f1°'PmposedUS&OPCS Loading-Lc t Ewing, NJ 08628 C1b1 l MTM I °nnmby:MLg rope: Phone:809.538.0400 Co O° TIAIEIA-222-F I D' e:07/08/08 e�M: NTS FAX:909.538.8858 PM:.w un M9140 E-3 • Stress Distribution Chi 0' - 130' '> 100% 90%-100% '75%90%'50%-75%,<50%Overstress Moo Face A Face B Face C 130M �I I I � I i I 110M „°.m i r, IW.ao ` — ---k�--� - W.w "x �� X � I 70.00 �/ � --- -- -- 70.00 d w SOM L 3000 - - - - - - - -- 3000 I I °W ,0w 00 \ 0.00 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc. Southold Police Station 32 West Upper Ferry Road ftj".Pro ed MetroLo din -Lc t Ewing, NJ 08628 CM :MTM C1e Phone:609.538.0400 CN*: TIA/EIA-222-F �:07/08109 $E1': NTS FAX:609.538.8858 P-'' a rI Mg NO.F-8 • Feedline Distribution C� 0' - 130' Round Flet AVP In Face App ON Fath Tuae Lep MOO Face A Face B Face C 13000 11500 _ _ 115.00 110.00 _ _ 11000 10000 100.00 80.00 - 90.0000 - -- - WOO - - 90,00 b 79.90 O u $ ; A t W 0 9 38.00 38.00 30.00 _ 30.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 _ _ 10.00 0.00 0.00 KV Consulting Engineers,Inc. Southold Police Stedon 32 West Upper Ferry Road Pme Pro edMevo "Load�n -lcf Ewing, NJ 08628 Clbm.MTM ..nn b,MLB i A_'e Phone:609.538.0400 00°°: TIA/EIA-222-F °i1e 07/08/09 �'e NTS FAX:609.538.8858 Pam: W7 1_ ox9 No.E-7 ' RISATower Jeb Southold Police Station Page26 of 26 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc Project Date 31 West Upper Ferry Road Proposed Metropcs Loading -LC 1 11:56:28 07/08/09 Ewing,NJ 08618 Client Designed by Phone:609.538.0400 MTM MLB FAX:609.538.8858 Top Girt Design Data Tension Section Elevation Size L L. K11r F. A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P P. P ft ft ft ksi in' K K po Tl 130-110 L21/2x21/2x3/16 4.01 3.76 58.0 21.600 0.9020 0.57 19.48 0.029 Section Capacity Table Section Elevation Component Size Critical P SF•Pw % Pass Na. ft Type Element K K Capacity Fail Tl 130-110 Leg 3 1 -18.22 179.52 10.2 Pass Diagonal L212x21/2x3/16 29 -3.79 18.45 20.5 Pass 46.0(b) Top Girt L21/2x21/2x3/16 6 -0.60 16.92 3.5 Pass T2 110-90 Leg 31/2 31 -44.16 213.90 20.6 Pass Diagonal L21/2x21/2x3/16 38 -5.11 11.73 43.6 Pass 62.0(b) T3 90-70 Leg 3 1/2 52 -79.01 213.90 36.9 Pass 37.1(b) Diagonal L3x3x3/16 59 -6.01 15.12 39.7 Pass 72.9(b) T4 70-50 Leg 4 73 -114.60 319.15 35.9 Pass 65.0(b) Diagonal L3x3x3/16 80 -6.63 11.88 55.8 Pass 8L2(b) TS 50-30 Leg 4 94 -146.76 380.97 38.5 Pass 64.1(b) Diagonal 2L212x212x3/16 104 -8.13 21.41 38.0 Pass 48.8(b) Horizontal L21/2x2120/16 97 -0.58 4.35 13.3 Pass T6 30-10 Leg 4 127 -180.88 380.97 47.5 Pass Diagonal 21,212x21/20/16 137 -8.51 17.69 48.1 Pass 51.2(b) Horizontal L21/2x212x3/16 136 -0.53 3.28 16.1 Pass 77 10-0 Leg 41/4 160 -196.49 441.99 44.5 Pass Diagonal 2L212x21/2x3/16 170 -8.44 16.22 52.1 Pass Horizontal L21/2x21/2x3/16 166 -0.19 2.89 6.5 Pass Summary Leg(T4) 65.0 Pass Diagonal 81.2 Pass (T4) Horizontal 16.1 Pass (T6) Top Girt 3.5 Pass (TI) Bolt Checks 81.2 Pass RATING= 81.2 Pass Program Version 5.3.1.0-10/32008 File://Mb-63/Im ce/MTM/Southold/Engineering/Southold LCI.eri V PINNACE TELECOM GROUP Consulting and Engineering Services rr=owaft ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT ANd REPORT M ETROPCS SITE NY7315 41405 ROUTE 25 - RECOMC, NY JANUARY 6, 2010 14 RIdGEdAIE AVENUE SUITE 209 • CHAR KNOIIS, NJ 07927 • 973.451.1630 CONTENTS INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY 3 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA S MATHEMATICAL COMPIIANCE ANAIYSIS 7 COMPLIANCE CONCIUSION 12 CERTIFICATION 13 ApPENdix A. BACkgROUNd ON THE FCC MPE LIMIT Appendix B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS 2 INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY At the request of MetroPCS, Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for a proposed wireless base station antenna operation to be added to an existing monopole at 41405 Route 25 in Peconic (Town of Southold), NY. MetroPCS refers to the site by the code "NY7315", and proposes panel antennas arranged for sectorized service coverage using the 2130-2140 MHz frequency band. The FCC requires all wireless operators to perform an assessment of the RF fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the compliance assessment needs to incorporate the RF effects of existing antenna operations by Nextel, AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless, Keyspan Corporation, and the Town of Southold. Note that FCC regulations require any future antenna collocator to specifically assess and assure continuing FCC compliance based on the overall RF effects of all proposed and then- existing antennas at the site. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula — and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, though, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is - satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment such as this can be described in layman's terms by expressing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded and there is a need to mitigate the potential exposure, while calculated RF levels lower 3 than 100 percent indicate compliance with the limit. We can (and will) also describe the worst-case result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below- the-limit"factor. The result of the FCC compliance assessment in this case is as follows: ❑ The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed antenna operations at the site is 0.6838 percent (i.e., less than 7/10"'8 of one percent) of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst- case calculated RF level is more than 146 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. ❑ The results of the calculations provide clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed antenna operations will be in clear compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and assumptions we incorporated in the analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than these calculation results indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ❑ relevant technical data on the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation at the site, as well as on the existing antenna operations; ❑ a description of the FCC model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ❑ analysis of the results, and the compliance conclusion for the antenna site. In addition, two Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit along with a list of key FCC references on compliance. Appendix B provides a summary of the qualifications of the expert certifying FCC compliance for this site. 4 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below summarizes the relevant technical data for the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation. a. Technical Data MetroPCS �3 Frequency Band 2130 -2140 MHz Service Coverage Type Sectorized—with identical transmission and com fiance-related parameters Antenna Manufacturer& Model Kathrein 800-10504 17.8 dBi Antenna Centerline Height AGL 90 ft. RF Channels per Sector 7 Transmitter Power/RF Channel 24 watts max. Antenna Line Loss Conservative) inored assumed 0 dB kK 'MT P.�A.c S�}.�`.���.^4-�- 'z --* ; 73ar,'-s .a'.,.T The antenna vertical-plane emission pattern is used in the calculations of RF levels at ground level around a site, as it is a key determinant of the relative amount of RF emissions in the "downward" direction. Figure 1 on the next page shows the vertical-plane emission pattern of the antenna model proposed here by MetroPCS. Note that in these types of antenna emission pattern diagrams, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. Note, too, that the use of a decibel scale to describe the relative pattern at different angles incidentally serves to significantly understate the actual focusing effects of the antenna. Where the antenna pattern reads 20 dB, for example, the relative RF energy emitted at the corresponding downward angle is 1/100`h of the maximum that occurs in the main beam (at 0 degrees); at the 30 dB point, it is 1/1,000'h of the maximum. 5 Figure 1. Kathrein 800-10504 Antenna—Vertical-plane Emission Pattern 0 deg 7rhorizon 5 /dhAsion As noted at the outset, there are existing antenna operations to include in the compliance assessment. For each of the cellular carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power. For the other operators, we will rely on the parameters in the respective FCC licenses. Nextel is licensed to operate in the 851 MHz frequency band. There is a maximum of 12 RF channels in each sector, and each channel is set for maximum of 100 watts of effective radiated power (for which the equivalent antenna input power is less than six watts). AT&T (also known as Cingular) is licensed to operate in both the 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as nine RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as three RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. 6 T-Mobile (also known as Omnipoint) is licensed to operate in the 1900 MHz band, and uses a maximum of eight RF channels in each antenna sector, with a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts per channel. Verizon is licensed to operate in both the 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 850 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. FCC licensing records show Keyspan Corporation is licensed to operate in both the 150 MHz and 450 MHz frequency bands. In the 150 MHz band it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 100 watts. In the 450 MHz band, it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 75 watts. FCC licensing records show the Town of Southold is licensed to operate in the 450 MHz band, with a maximum transmitter power of 15 watts. MAThEMATICAI COMPLIANCE ANA1Y515 FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest= and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach. The FCC's formula for street-level compliance assessment for any given wireless antenna operation is as follows: 7 0 MPE% _ 000*TXPower* 10(GMU-vdsa10) *4)/( MPE *47c * RZ) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 10 cc0,U-vd-J10, = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (22= 4) MPE = FCC general population MPE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 2 on the following page. s antenna height from antenna bottom to 6.5'above ground level 0 o 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 2. MPE% Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level — which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represent non-compliance and a 9 0 need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas and sectorized coverage arrangements are used, the compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single (facing) sector, as the RF effects of directional antennas facing generally away are insignificant. The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power and maximum channel capacity — and the power-attenuation effects referred to antenna line loss are ignored wherever possible. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased)via a "perfect"field reflection from the ground itself. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur—and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very"safe-side"conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operator, with the worst-case (maximum) result highlighted in bold in the last column. 10 Ground MetroPCS Nextel AT&T T-Mobile Verizon Keyspan Town of Total Dist(ft) MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% Southold MPE% c MPE% MHA0 0.0208 0.0008 0.0112 0.0003 0.0140 0.0024 0.0004 0.0499 _. 20 0.0156 0.0008 0.0200 0.0004 0.0264 0.0258 0.0011 0.0901 40 0.2979 0.0009 0.0242 0.0125 0.0325 0.0673 0.0027 0.4380 60 0.0943 0.0006 0.0357 0.0160 0.0390 0.0854 0.0032 0.2742 80 0.1033 0.0053 0.0328 0.0083 0.0310 0.0882 0.0094 0.2783 100 0.1191 0.0090 0.0361 0.0107 0.0457 0.0150 0.0020 0.2376 120 0.0662 0.0025 0.1334 0.0256 0.1209 0.0409 0.0059 0.3954 140 0.0698 0.0047 0.2590 0.0239 0.2399 0.0810 0.0055 0.6838 160 0.0425 0.0320 0.1563 0.0564 0.1423 0.1054 0.0036 0.5385 180 0.0778 0.0547 0.0438 0.0122 0.0473 0.1031 0.0019 0.3408 200 0.0958 0.0541 0.0128 0.0014 0.0156 0.0868 0.0009 0.2674 220 0.0498 0.0356 0.0507 0.0225 0.0464 0.0758 0.0031 0.2839 240 0.0283 0.0149 0.1406 0.0105 0.1343 0.0890 0.0096 0.4272 260 0.0435 0.0014 0.1672 0.0022 0.1624 0.0845 0.0122 0.4734 280 0.0630 0.0051 0.1671 0.0088 0.1635 0.0665 0.0103 0.4843 300 0.0733 0.0116 0.1385 0.0215 0.1318 0.0343 0.0055 0.4165 320 0.0688 0.0202 0.0905 0.0311 0.0839 0.0242 0.0036 0.3223 340 0.0537 0.0362 0.0809 0.0320 0.0750 0.0267 0.0035 0.3080 360 0.0366 0.0367 0.0447 0.0257 0.0404 0.0475 0.0062 0.2378 380 0.0330 0.0357 0.0217 0.0168 0.0213 0.0681 0.0085 0.2051 400 0.0224 0.0325 0.0189 0.0136 0.0227 0.0859 0.0100 0.2060 420 0.0183 0.0277 0.0173 0.0125 0.0207 0.0996 0.0103 0.2064 440 0.0168 0.0197 0.0327 0.0181 0.0378 0.1058 0.0090 0.2399 460 0.0154 0.0117 0.0300 0.0166 0.0347 0.0974 0.0083 0.2141 480 0.0187 0.0108 0.0620 0.0266 0.0645 0.1008 0.0065 0.2899 500 0.0172 0.0046 0.0573 0.0246 0.0596 0.0934 1 0.0061 1 0.2628 As indicated, the worst-case calculated result is 0.6838 percent of the FCC MPE limit. A graph of the calculation results, shown on the next page, perhaps provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. As might be expected with such low calculated RF levels, the line representing the results barely rises above the graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. 11 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS Normalized FCC MPE Limit --O � Total MPE% Results 120 a 100 a 80 0 a 60 d (g 40 w 0 20 e 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) COMPLIANCE CONCLUSION The FCC MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and completely safe. As described, the analysis in this case shows that the conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is only 0.6838 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level from all the antennas at the site is more than 146 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. 12 CERTIFICATION It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the antenna emissions at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RF exposure. 1/6/10. Danie J. ollins Date Chief Technical Officer Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC 13 APPENdIX A. BAckgROUNd ON ThE FCC MPE LIMIT FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community—notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 at seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 14 Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) (mWlcm2) (MW/CM2) 0.3- 1.34 100 100 1.34- 3.0 100 180/ F2 3.0- 30 900/F2 180/ FZ 30- 300 1.0 0.2 300- 1,500 F/300 F/ 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mW/cm2) 100 Occupational --------- General Public 5.0 1.0 0.2 ------- I I I I I I I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency(MHz) Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 15 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. FCC References 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 22 (Public Mobile Services). 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 24 (Personal Communications Services). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(8)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, "Questions and Answers About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition 4, August 1999. 16 AppENdix B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUA[IFICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis .37 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure • Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 12,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 •Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,200 times since 1997 •Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as by the FCC Education: • B.E.E., City College of New York(Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 •M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 • Bronx High School of Science 1966 Current Responsibilities: • Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: •Edwards& Kelcey, VP—RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 •Bellcore, Executive Director—Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 •AT&T(Corp. HQ), Director—Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 •AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor—Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RF Safety/ • Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: • Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG •While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure • Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and other consulting/engineering firms Other Background. .Author, Microwave System Engineering(AT&T, 1974) •Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services(Bellcore, 1993) • National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA)—former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 • Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and International Who's Who in Information Technology •Published more than 35 articles in indust magazines 17 PINNACE TELECOM GROUP Consulting and Engineering Services iF/ cawft ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT ANd REPORT METROPCS SITE NY7315 41405 RoUTE 25 PECONic, NY 1 u ly 2, 2009 14 RidgEdAlE AVENUE - SUITE 209 • WAR KNolls, NJ 07927 • 973.451.1630 CONTENTS INTROdUCTION AWSUMMARY 3 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA S MATHEMATICAL COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS 7 COMPLIANCE CONCIUMON 12 CERTIFICATION 12 APPENdIX A. BAckgROUNd ON THE FCC MPE LIMIT APPENdIX B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS 2 INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY At the request of MetroPCS, Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for a proposed wireless base station antenna operation to be added to an existing monopole at 41405 Route 25 in Peconic (Town of Southold), NY. MetroPCS refers to the site by the code "NY7315", and proposes panel antennas arranged for sectorized service coverage using the 2130-2140 MHz frequency band. The FCC requires all wireless operators to perform an assessment of the RF fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the compliance assessment needs to incorporate the RF effects of existing antenna operations at the site by AT&T (also known as Cingular), Nextel, Keyspan Corporation, and the Town of Southold. Note that FCC regulations require any future antenna collocator to specifically assess and assure continuing FCC compliance based on the overall RF effects of all proposed and then- existing antennas at the site. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula — and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, though, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment such as this can be described in layman's terms by expressing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded and there is a need to mitigate the potential exposure, while calculated RF levels lower 3 r 0 than 100 percent indicate compliance with the limit. We can (and will) also describe the worst-case result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below- the-limit' factor. The result of the FCC compliance assessment in this case is as follows: ❑ The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed antenna operations at the site is 0.4200 percent (i.e., less than one-half of one percent) of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst- case calculated RF level is more than 235 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. ❑ The results of the calculations provide clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed antenna operations will be in clear compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and assumptions we incorporated in the analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than these calculation results indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ❑ relevant technical data on the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation at the site, as well as on the existing antenna operation; ❑ a description of the FCC model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ❑ analysis of the results, and the compliance conclusion for the antenna site. In addition, two Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit along with a list of key FCC references on compliance. Appendix B provides a summary of the qualifications of the expert certifying FCC compliance for this site. 4 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below summarizes the relevant technical data for the proposed MetroPCS antenna operation. Technical Data-MetroPCS Frequency Band 2130-2140 MHz Service Coverage Type Sectorized—with identical transmission and compliance-related parameters Antenna Manufacturer& Model Kathrein 800-10504 17.8 dBi Antenna Centerline Height AGL 90 ft. RF Channels per Sector 7 Transmitter Power/ RF Channel 24 watts max. Antenna Line Loss Conservativel ignored assumed 0 dB The antenna vertical-plane emission pattern is used in the calculations of RF levels at ground level around a site, as it is a key determinant of the relative amount of RF emissions in the "downward" direction. Figure 1 on the next page shows the vertical-plane emission pattern of the antenna model proposed here by MetroPCS. Note that in these types of antenna emission pattern diagrams, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. Note, too, that the use of a decibel scale to describe the relative pattern at different angles incidentally serves to significantly understate the actual focusing effects of the antenna. Where the antenna pattern reads 20 dB, for example, the relative RF energy emitted at the corresponding downward angle is 1/100`" of the maximum that occurs in the main beam (at 0 degrees); at the 30 dB point, it is 1/1,000' of the maximum. 5 Figure 1. Kathrein 800-10504 Antenna—Vertical-plane Emission Pattern 0 deg 17Fhorizon 5 /diusion As noted at the outset, there are existing antenna operations to include in the compliance assessment. For each of the cellular carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power. For the other operator, we will rely on the parameters in its FCC license. AT&T is licensed to operate in both the 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as nine RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as three RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. Nextel is licensed to operate in the 851 MHz frequency band. There is a maximum of 12 RF channels in each sector, and each channel is set for maximum of 100 watts of effective radiated power (for which the equivalent antenna input power is less than six watts). We recognize that Nextel is involved in transitioning its service to the 935 MHz band, but the transmission parameters will be the same, and performing the analysis at 851 MHz, which is subject to a slightly lower MPE limit, is conservative. 6 Keyspan Corporation is licensed to operate in both the 150 MHz and 450 MHz frequency bands. In the 150 MHz band it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 100 watts. In the 450 MHz band, it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 75 watts. FCC licensing records show the Town of Southold is licensed to operate in the 450 MHz band, with a maximum transmitter power of 15 watts. MAThEMATICAI COMpIIANCE ANAIySIS FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest — and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach. The FCC's formula for street-level compliance assessment for any given wireless antenna operation is as follows: MPE% _ (100 *TxPower* 10 (Gm'-vdsuio) *4)/( MPE *4rc * R2) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage 7 TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 10 (Gma-vd sa10) = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (2Z=4) MPE = FCC general population MPE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 2 below. antenna height from antenna R bottom to 6.5'above ground level —ri 0 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 2. MPE%Calculation Geometry 8 It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level — which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPEW, and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represent non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas and sectorized coverage arrangements are used, the compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single (facing) sector, as the RF effects of directional antennas facing generally away are insignificant. Based on FCC guidelines, the following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power and maximum channel capacity — and the power-attenuation effects referred to antenna line loss are ignored wherever possible. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the s line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "perfect"field reflection from the ground itself. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur—and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operator, with the worst-case (maximum) result highlighted in bold in the last column. As indicated, the worst-case calculated result is 0.4200 percent of the FCC MPE. A graph of the calculation results, shown on the next page below the table, perhaps provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. As might be expected with such low calculated RF levels, the line representing the results d above the graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. 10 Ground MetroPCS AT&T Nextel Key span Town of Total Dist(ft) MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% SoutholdMPE% MPE% 0 0.0208 0.0112 0.0008 0.0024 0.0004 0.0356 20 0.0156 0.0200 0.0008 0.0258 0.0011 0.0633 40 0.2979 0.0242 0.0009 0.0673 0.0027 0.3930 60 0.0943 0.0357 0.0006 0.0854 0.0032 0.2192 80 1 0.1033 0.0328 0.0053 1 0.0882 0.0094 0.2390 100 0.1191 0.0361 0.0090 0.0150 0.0020 0.1812 120 0.0662 0.1334 0.0025 0.0409 0.0059 0.2489 140 0.0698 0.2590 0.0047 0.0810 0.0055 0.4200 160 0.0425 0.1563 0.0320 0.1054 0.0036 0.3398 180 0.0778 0.0438 0.0547 0.1031 0.0019 0.2813 200 0.0958 0.0128 0.0541 0.0868 0.0009 0.2504 220 0.0498 0.0507 0.0356 0.0758 0.0031 0.2150 240 0.0283 0.1406 0.0149 0.0890 0.0096 0.2824 260 1 0.0435 0.1672 0.0014 0.0845 0.0122 0.3088 280 0.0630 0.1671 0.0051 0.0665 0.0103 0.3120 300 0.0733 0.1385 0.0116 0.0343 0.0055 0.2632 320 0.0688 0.0905 0.0202 0.0242 0.0036 0.2073 340 0.0537 0.0809 0.0362 0.0267 0.0035 0.2010 360 0.0366 0.0447 0.0367 0.0475 0.0062 0.1717 380 0.0330 0.0217 0.0357 0.0681 0.0085 0.1670 400 0.0224 0.0189 0.0325 0.0859 0.0100 0.1697 420 0.0183 0.0173 0.0277 0.0996 0.0103 0.1732 440 0.0168 0.0327 0.0197 0.1058 0.0090 0.1840 460 0.0154 0.0300 0.0117 0.0974 0.0083 0.1628 480 0.0187 0.0620 0.0108 0.1008 0.0065 0.1988 500 0.0172 0.0573 0.0046 0.0934 0.0061 0.1786 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS Normalized FCC MPE Limit Total MPE% Results 120 Lu 100 - 80 - 0 00 a 80 0 a 60 d 0 ao 0 0 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) 11 COMPLIANCE CONCLUSION The FCC MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and completely safe. As described, the analysis in this case shows that the conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is only 0.4200 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level from all the antennas at the site is more than 235 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. CERTIFICATION It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 12 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the antenna emissions at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RF exposure. 7/2/09 Danie ollins Date Chief Technical Officer Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC 13 AppENdix A: BAckgROUNd ON TILE FCC MPE LIMIT FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community—notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 14 Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) (mWlcm2) (mWlcm=) 0.3- 1.34 100 100 1.34- 3.0 100 180/ F 3.0- 30 900/ F2 180/ F2 30- 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F/300 F/ 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mW/CM2) 100 Occupational - General Public 5.0 1.0 0.2 —_ I I I I I I I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency(MHz) Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 15 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. FCC References 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 22 (Public Mobile Services). 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 24 (Personal Communications Services). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, "Questions and Answers About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition 4, August 1999. 16 APPENdIX B: SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUAMICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis: •37 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure • Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 12,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 •Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,200 times since 1997 •Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as by the FCC Education: .B.E.E., City College of New York(Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 •M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 • Bronx High School of Science 1966 Current Responsibilities: •Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: • Edwards & Kelcey, VP—RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 •Bellcore, Executive Director—Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 •AT&T(Corp. HQ), Director—Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 •AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor—Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RF Safety/ • Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: •Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG •While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure •Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and other consulting/engineering firms Other Background: •Author, Microwave System Engineering(AT&T, 1974) •Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services(Bellcore, 1993) • National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA)—former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 • Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and International Who's Who in Information Technology •Published more than 35 articles in industry magazines 17 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 75 - 5 - 14 . 1 The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. © Building Dept. 0 Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital 0 construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) FE (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit,approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: „ar Location of action: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York 11958 Site acreage: 12 . 1 Presentlanduse: Police Station and public utility Present zoning classification: R-80 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: MetroPCS New York, LLC (b) Mailing address: 5 Skyline Drive Hawthorne New York 10532 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) (914) 5 9 3-8 5 5 6 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No 2I yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ (Not Applicable-please explain) Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ❑ No ❑ (Not Applicable—please explain) Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No [E (Not Applicable—please explain) Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LNNRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No 0 (Not Applicable—please explain) Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes E No ® (Not Applicable—please explain) Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Nish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. © Yes 0 No 0 (Not Applicable—please explain) Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III—Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No❑ (Not Applicable—please explain) Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ (Not Applicable—please explain) Heter to attachment PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YesO No® (Not Applicable—please explain) Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes [:1 No [E (Not Applicable—please explain) Reter to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. El Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable—please explain Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable—please explain Refer to attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. EYes ❑ No © Not Applicable—please explain Refer to attachment Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: Public Utility Wireless Communication Services Facility consisting of proposed antennas, with an approximate top height of 92'-2", mounted to an existing 130' lattice tower with support equipment near the base of the tower within a proposed 12'-0" x 15"-0" fenced extension of the existing compound. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy I. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The adverse effects of development are mitigated by collocating the proposed telecommunications facility on an existing tower. As such, the community character of the area, specifically Peconic Lane (scenic byway w/ scenic farmland and residential neighborhoods) and Indian Neck Lane (scenic farmland and residential neighborhoods), will not be adversely affected. With regards to community considerations, based on the above, the proposed undertaking meets the longstanding planning goals of the Town of Southold which are to "reflect the interest in preserving and enhancing the natural and built environment and providing opportunities for a level of growth and expansion of the economic base that is compatible with the existing scale of development, availability of water, existing sensitive environment of the Town and its historic heritage." Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. EBI evaluated whether the stipulations contained within Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas(the"Collocation Agreement")allow MetroPCS New York, LLC to construct the proposed facility without consulting with the New York State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO). Based on the project design the Collocation Agreement's exclusionary conditions for SHPO consultation apply to this project. Based on the above, the proposed undertaking will protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria A. Minimize introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. The adverse effects of the proposed project are mitigated by collocating the proposed telecommunications facility on an existing tower. Of importance, no microwave dishes will be installed. In addition, the equipment compound will be fenced and located interior to the existing equipment compound on the subject property, thereby reducing any visual impact from the neighboring lots. B. Restore deteriorated and remove degraded visual components. N/A C. Screen components of development which detract from visual quality. The equipment compound will be fenced and located interior to the existing equipment compound on the subject property, thereby reducing any visual impact from the neighboring lots. D. Use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment to an existing telecommunications facility. As such, is compatible to existing scale, form and material. E. Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality: I. Preserve existing vegetation which contributes to the scenic quality of the landscape. 2. Allow for selective clearing of vegetation to provide public views without impairing values associated with the affected vegetation. 3. Restore historic or important designed landscapes to preserve intended or designed aesthetic values. 4. Restore or add indigenous vegetative cover that presents a natural appearance. The proposed undertaking will not disturb existing vegetation. F. Improve the visual quality associated with hamlet areas. N/A G. Improve the visual quality of historic maritime areas. N/A H. Protect the visual interest provided by active water-dependent uses. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment to an existing telecommunications facility. Visual interest provided by active water-dependent uses will not be adversely impacted. I. Anticipate and prevent impairment of dynamic landscape elements that contribute to ephemeral visual qualities. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment to an existing telecommunications facility. Dynamic landscape elements that contribute to ephemeral visual qualities will not be affected. J. Protect visual quality associated with public lands, including public transportation routes, public parks and public trust lands and waters. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment at an existing telecommunications facility. The proposed undertaking will not introduce further negative visual elements that would cause an interruption of vistas important to the character of the area. 1. Limit water surface coverage or intrusion to the minimum amount necessary. N/A 2. Limit alteration of shoreline elements which contribute to scenic quality. N/A K. Protect visual quality associated with agricultural land, open space and natural resources. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment to an existing telecommunications facility. The visual quality of agricultural land, open space and natural resources will be protected. I. Maintain or restore original landforms except where altered landforms provide useful screening or contribute to scenic quality. Existing landforms will not be altered. 2. Group or orient structures during site design to preserve open space and provide visual organization. All supporting structures will be located within a proposed equipment compound adjacent to the existing compound. 3. Avoid structures or activities which introduce visual interruptions to natural landscapes including: a) introduction of intrusive artificial light sources; Intrusive artificial lighting is not proposed. b) fragmentation of and structural intrusion into open space areas; open space areas will not be affected c) changes to the continuity and configuration of natural shorelines and associated vegetation The natural shoreline will not be affected Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the site area indicates that the property and the surrounding areas are not located within a Special Flood Hazard Areas inundated by 100-Year Flood. Policy S. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. N/A Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment at an existing telecommunications facility and will not impact the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. According to the "Guidelines for Consultation with NY Natural Heritage regarding Proposed Collocations of Telecommunication Facilities on Existing Towers and Buildings", issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)— Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources, dated May 2009, for communications facilities projects that involve "New or existing towers, antennae, and associated equipment installed at a location currently wholly occupied by lawn, pavement and/or gravel," the NYSDEC does not "have any records of rare species or significant natural communities which will be of concern in relation to the proposed projects." Inasmuch as the proposed project is located on land previously disturbed, rare species or significant natural communities will not be affected by development of the proposed undertaking. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. The proposed undertaking will not generate air pollution. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. The proposed undertaking is un-manned and will not generate solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. N/A Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. N/A Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. N/A Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. The proposed project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment at an existing telecommunications facility, thereby protecting agricultural land. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. NIA 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner,whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet Flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑Part 1 ❑Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will riot have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on tfie environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared 'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible icer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. if information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Public Utility Wireless Communication Services Facility Site ID#NY7315 Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 165 Peconic Lane(a/k/a 41815 or 41405 Main Rd.(a/k/a Rte.25),Hamlet of Peconic,Town of Southold,Suffolk County Name of Applicant/Sponsor MetroPCS New York,LLC Address 5 Skyline Drive City/PO Hawthorne State New York Zip Code 10532 Business Telephone (914)593-8556 Name of Owner(if different) Town of Southold(Peconic Police Department) Address 41815 Main Road City/PO Peconic State New York Zip Code 11958 Business Telephone 631-765-2671 Description of Action: Public Utility Wireless Communication Services Facility consisting of proposed antennas,with an approximate top height of 92'-2", mounted to an existing 130'lattice tower with support equipment near the base of the tower within a proposed 12'-0"x 15"-0"fenced extension of the existing compound. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑✓ Other Police station and animal shelter 2. Total acreage of project area: 12.1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres _ 0 acres Forested 0 acres 0 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0 acres 0 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 11.1 acres 11.096 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1 acres 1.004 acres Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Haven loam,0-2%slopes a. Soil drainage: ❑✓ Well drained 100%of site ❑Moderately well drained_%of site. ❑Poorly drained _%of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres(see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes El No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: F-10-10%—% 010- 15%—% ❑ 15% or greater_% 0. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes O No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes MNo g. What is the depth of the water table? >6.7 (in feet) g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ME Yes ❑ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ❑� No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ❑No According to: Fw York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Identify eachspecies: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? 1:1 Yes R No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? El Yes ns No if es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes ONo Peconic Lane(scenic byway w/scenic farmland and residential neighborhoods),Indian Neck Lane(scenic farmland and residential neighborhoods) 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: No a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No b. Size(in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑� Yes n No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes FINo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Yes ElNo 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes ri No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes Ei No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 0.004 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.004 acres initially; 0.004 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 1/month (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet)of largest proposed structure: 6'-3" height; 2'-11" width; 2'-8" length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 ft. 2. How much natural material (.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed 0Yes 11No RE N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes F±]No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes F1 No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes a No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: t months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes a No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 4 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes a No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes no No a. If yes, indicate type of waste(sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes a No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes allo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes a No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. if yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? —]Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes BNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes no No 19. Will project routinely produce odors(more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? F]Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate type(s) Minimal increase in electrical power(200 AMPS) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallonstminute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallonstday. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? -]Yes No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date lease City, Town, Village Board Yes ❑No Special Exemption City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑ No Site Plan Application City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑� No City, County Health Department ❑Yes MNo Other Local Agencies ❑Yes a No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No State Agencies ❑Yes [j] No Federal Agencies ❑Yes El No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? E]Yes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment Q Zoning variance ❑New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑� Site plan Q Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-80:Residential Low Density District 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 2-acre minimum 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-80:Residential Low Density District 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? If inimurn 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Q Yes No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? The existing telecommunications tower is located on Town-owned property. On this property,to the south,are an animal league structure,storage yard and police station. Beyond the Town property,residences lie to the south and southwest of the tower. Several vineyards are located nearby. Cochran Park,which houses a stadium and baseball fields,lies approximately one quarter mile to the northeast of the existing facility. There are residences along Peconic Lane,and there is an elementary school and Town recreation center to the east. Zoning Classifications: R-80 R-40 AC B 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/4 mile? ❑i Yes No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes a No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services(recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑Yes F] No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes❑� No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name MetroPCS New York,LLC Date 11/20/2009 Signature z� environmental consultant for the applicant Title EBI Consulting,Program Director-Telecommunications If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 Vendor No. Check No. Town of Southold, New York - Payment Voucher Vendor Name Vendor Address Entered by CAudit Date ven T ber � CMS 70 Cambridge Drive Town Clerk Vena enactt \\ n Glenmont, NY 12077 Invoice Invoice invoice Net Pmtbase Order--LOI"L. Number Date Total f - Distoma--,[Arno-tClaftned Number De5criptim of ftds or S -ces General Ledger Fwd and Amount Number 55/ y l- 11-1- b l o��r — /68-,71 er(131 nS n �l1 -Le q 5�0 fb& /o d �q 8 o /3 X115, i l Payee Certification t Depart*xit Certification 1 Signature" 1 l� Title v- Si- Tide S AN\C\ �7 ate Company Name Date . f Client:Southold Metro PCS Invoice 11/26/2010 165 Pecenis ic Lane Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 The Center for Municipal Solutions Invoice#:55141-003 70 Cambridge Dr. Glenmont,NY 12077 Date: Description (518)439-3079 Hrs Rate: Expenses. Amount 18-Oct prepare for PB workshop and BP hearing 0.5 $ 250.00 $ 125.00 12 time In attendance and participation In PB workshop and 18-Oct PB meeting 0.9 $ 250.00 $ 225.00 18-Oct 12 travel time 4.8 $ 125.00 $ 600.00 18-oct 12 mileage 239@$.50 per mile $ 119.90 18-oct 12 tolls $ 11.65 18-Oct ml/2 meals $ 6.26 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 1,087.81 $ 137.81 $ 950.00 I,Richard A.Comi,certify that the above account In the amount of $ 1,087.81 Is true and correct;that the Items,services and disbursements charged were rendered to or for the municipality on the dates stated;that no part has been paid or satisfied; - that taxes,from which the municipality is exempt,are not Included;and that the amount claimed Is actually due. 11/1/2010 RIA (Electronic Signature) Date Signature DEQ 1 D 2n1� Vendor No -- �� Check No. a Town of Southold, New York- Payment Voucher 33002 m w Vendor lame Vendor Address Entered b y a Nm 0- k -- Audit Dale Vm Telephone Num �{ - 1.- —..—. .. �• —w� 1 /n�/L _� � Town Clerk AICory tavoice lmaice Invoiee ' net Pmtbase Grda Nmnber Dale Total IIdwc IAmo®t Nmaber '®at Goods or Ser�es Gmerak lEdsm Pimd end Account Number SS -(,b 1 131 StJ �i SOD f^ i I U H V f i m m. '. m Payee Certiiteati®' Dep:;Zt Certification N LL� I � I N CV "' SigoaRue Title _. Si�aimx m C�yName Date il` L"� Ism 1"rtie�\C!_k�`J.�_ N �T N e4 11/24/2010 12:28 5184780909 CTS PAGE 05 _ Client:Southold NY Metro PCS • Invoice 11/24/2010 165 Paconic Lane Peconlc The Center for Municipal Solutions SCTM#100.75.5-14.1 70 Cambridge Dr. Invoice 0:551414001 Gianmon6 NY 12077 Dale: Description (515)439-3079 We Rate' Expenses, Amount 1 Jun Site visit with the Southold-9 Planning division 0.5 $ 250.00 $ 125.00 $ 15.25 i-Jun Mileage 30.5 Q$.50 $ 5.75 1•Jun Sheller Island Ferry 1-Jun Travel time toArom Southold 0.8 $ 125.00 $ 93,75 12-Jun Reviewed application materials;drafted response to 40 $ 250.00 $ 1,000.00 application 14-Jun Initial review of application material 1.0 $ 250.0 $ 20.0 22-Jun review and revise draft report 0.9 $ 250.00 $ 225.00 22-Jun Reviewed and revised response to application 0.7 $ 250.00 $ 175.0 25-Jun review,finalize and distribute draft letter to client OS $ 250.0 $ 125.00 .00 1-Jul diettlbuta letter per client's request TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ $ 2,239.75 $ 21.00 $ 2,218.75 I,Richard A.Coml,certify that the above account in the amount of $ 2,239.75 Is true and correct;that the items,services and disbursements charged were rendered to or forthe municipality on the dates stated;that no part has been paid or satisfied; that taxes,from which the munlcipelity is exempt,are not Included;and that the amount claimed is actually due. 1l7! 2010 . !�rrc_' (Electmnio Signature) Data Signature 0 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��OFsoyo P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �� l0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair # OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.SOLOMON S G �p 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE L. SOLOMON O� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND ycouffi`1�1�` Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: June 7, 2010 Re: Check The attached check is a consultant fee for a wireless facility review. Please deposit into a deferred account. Thank you. Applicant/Project Tax Map # Amount Check Name & Type Date/No. MetroPCS at Police Station 75-5-14.1 1 $7,000 6/3/10-5769 LR aft. cc: file uc 5769 32-01107X HA 16R, NY 10532 r a �� Owt Q oUthgkf R UOOM p"y�� bhrf �,;j(#�1y{ ib #kk{Ye/ik):4"kt444'FkX*4'k44kW*4*k4'{*{ye#{{{Ye4RR***WX}t*1YtXXi{{Xi{4"X}k{*{{R{RikfX***XR4k4kYt4W4*4k{kR4f(Y{f Q u EMQt3uve 15 ±y � �/C MT4PE�� 4 + r3'ClCJO1'Von kt, 634 434 .x.. mOPCS NEW YORK U.0 Town of Southold 6/3/2010 5769 Escrow Fee NY7315 7,000.00 NY Imprest Escrow Fee NY7315 7,000.00 i KOPCB NEW VMr,LLC Town of Southold 6/3/2010 5769 Escrow Fee NY7315 7,000.00 NY Imprest Escrow Fee NY7315 7,000.00 MurCHECK IIIIIIIII1111111111 39287 • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS la soar P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR O�� y0l Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �' �� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI , CO W�`� Southold, NY fl l Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: April 9, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached check into a deferred account. It represents Consultant fees for a wireless application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check bate/No. Type I # Authorization Code Wireless consultant fee 75-5-14.1 1 $1,500 4/7/10 -#5402 640 �* , ., 40 To 6��Yf'klunllt�,S r >�p`t v' fO t _. '! 'k* k *f{RL.i*$f[}efRiMRYM9rttKkY%Iii'!i{#{1ftYtY4Tff.#e�eYf4_h1RbYfiRIIk'}'k�uYiiRf*%$Vf1M}tt4�{k�tf�' t�� 1 f +snrFlv > dd , = 7o�Mt1 oLSol�till¢1t� , "AAEMo ]U4 eeeY34rOotsGlte,nt A _--_ r t:.> lit, 2 , 639 : 434 Dis • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS O f SQ P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR �O�a yQIO Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G ' 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND % DONALD J.WILCENSKI (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) y�QUlrN, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: February 25, 2010 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached checks into a deferred account. They represent Site Plan Application and Wireless Special Exception fees for an application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check Date/No. Type # Authorization Code Wireless 165 Peconic La. SP app. fee 75-5-14.1 $1,000 10/13/09 -#4702 Wireless 165 Peconic La. Spec. exc t 75-5-14.1 $1,000 10/13/09 -#4703 LR Atts. rdopcs r� or+K.Lac 4702 n{ x °- biA1N'�k1EiFtN�E,NY !0532 3avtno3x 10113/200 a x + u o ro t m L� t[4'iZQVt�N�ld• Ia1y000.00 o n a�b'' in���A�f.RRatxxtxRlY•tRxxtwwwIet* twxxxxttxwxktxxxtwwt*R at*wtRRRaxrtR+*t«rtt*Rwaaxti:xtRwt«.exxtaRaxtxxaxrwxtixtxx r.OLLARS _ a TOWf1$fS4uthQld 4 7 AIEMU �1l�eS}*' App Fee-,NY7315 n eo S cw rt aE --- S ��"L740D-4^i{72n• ..�: iL'MOO 21: 442 &jq, 434Lis: lm4wr Ips- NETROPCS NEW YORK,LLC , Town of Southold 10/13/2009 4702 Site Plan App. Fee- NY7315 1,000.00 NY Imprest Site Plan App. Fee- NY7315 1,000.00 . sacs YORK,LLC X703 " 55KV'U EDRti/E Yein��an #IAwfHbRNE,NY 10532e 10/13/2009 a , FfZ TOpvO{1f Southold j $•t,000.Q0 G Tho (�h/1�Q#fklhMYlei4i,F44ki44ii1r3I,444MlWYkiYefiN{ik+td*Rkfik4fififiWRtfitlfi44Mfi41efifihfifi4*fi1,R1fi#fki3f#41i#tk4kY41W44,1W DOLLARS[ 1{K/ 44 WW 2'- ToWii of South t id S 1e M' t gxcgorion.App, Fee NY7315 T —__-- +� � ,} AUTHORIE DSIGNATURE Z Y 'f7b004"7031'' •r: i_i 100001.2 : 44.x' .639 MEMPCS NEW YORK,LLC ' Town of Southold 10/13/2009 4703 Special Exception App. Fee NY7315 1,000.00 NY Imprest Special Exception App, Fee NY7315 1,000.00 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT for MTM Southold Police Station NY7315 MTM No. 09MPSTS008 KMCE Project No.: 090507.00 130 Ft. Self-Supported Triangular Tower Southold, New York Prepared By: CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 32 West Upper Ferry Rd, Ewing, NJ 08628 Ph: (609) 538-0400 Fax: (609) 538-8858 July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 - Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2 - July 9, 2010) (rev. 3 - August 3, 2010) (rev. 4 - August 25, 2010) Prepared to TIA/EIA-222-F June 1996 Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................3 2.0 TOWER INVENTORY................................................................................................4 3.0 COMMENTARY..........................................................................................................5 4.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE .........................................................................................6 5.0 TOWER ANALYSIS RESULTS .................................................................................7 5.1 FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................8 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................9 7.0 APPENDIX...............................................................................................................10 Load Case No. 1: Existing Conditions w/proposed MetroPCS antenna and coax MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2-July 9, 2010) (rev. 3-August 3, 2010) (rev.4-August 25, 2010) 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Structure Owner/Manager: Southold Police Department Location: Southold Police Station 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY Manufacturer: Forth Worth Tower Equipment Existing tower inventory and the proposed installed equipment are detailed in Section 2.0 "Tower Inventory." Synopsis The existing tower superstructure with the installation of proposed equipment will meet current TIA standards. Load Case No. 1: The existing tower superstructure with the addition of(6) antenna and (12) cables. The foundation is at 216% which does not meet the present standards. The tower is 91.9% End of Executive Summary- 3 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8,2009 (rev. 1 -Dec. 14,2009) (rev.2-July 9,2010) (rev. 3-August 3,2010) (rev. 4-August 25,2010) 2.0 TOWER INVENTORY DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION 6eacor 137 {3i ALP-E-WWI fvertionl 10C Super Stationmaster 130 12 SB wr Mount IVerlZon) 10C i 3)726202 WMI 137 20 Wn)pMinna 10C )6)Carrave pane)2%3'(ATI) 130 42120'Wnp Andvna 100 5 Side MAIM Srandor(t)IATI; 137 (2)20Whip Anterna 10C 6'Side Mount Stan63r f t) ATI) 130 GPS W Stand-of Arm 'DC 6'Side Mount SMndorr(1 y)ATI) 130 .;31ALP-E-97111V1r12on; 'DC 06710E 15'Wt�Antenna 137 7'VhF 00 prod YagI 9t 06610E 15'Wnp Antenna 137 Genenc Side Arm Mount)atetropms 90 06510E 15'Wrp Arnenna 132 ;21 KXWM 60010504 tk4Mpea) 90 2 DKr 130 (2)Kat2Vem NO ID404 IMMpcsl 90 3-DIir 130 {2)KamrW 60010504(Metropc4.I 90 x1214865.18-XXDPL2 or Sean 115 CeWIW Sloe Am'Mount lMetropca) 90 Mounts(T-Modlk) Genane Side Arm Mount luetropcb) 90 1T Seetor Mount)Venzonj 107 6'UHF WMp Minna)-offset) 38 1T Sector Mount VMSon' 100 standoff mount(4) 38 3)ALP-E-9011 IVer¢on, 100 `proposed (6) Metro PCS antenna @ 90' AGL. 4 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2-July 9,2010) (rev. 3-August 3,2010) (rev.4-August 25,2010) 3.0 COMMENTARY Our scope of work is to determine if the existing structure is capable of withstanding additional stresses/forces imposed by the installation of the proposed equipment noted in the tower inventory. Tower drawings were not available. Information obtained from a tower climb were utilized in this analysis. All members were assumed to be installed as per manufacturers specifications and are in like-new condition. Foundation drawings were also not available. KMCE previously conducted non-destructive investigation to determine the size of foundation.The findings were utilized in this analysis. The following report will provide analytical calculations and commentary regarding the capacity of the existing tower and subsequent recommendations. 5 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2-July 9, 2010) (rev. 3-August 3, 2010) (rev.4-August 25, 2010) 4.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. carried out their structural analysis by correlating field inspection and tower member data into proprietary software designed specifically for communication tower analysis. These programs run in conjunction with the guidelines set down in the TIA/EIA-222-F June 1996 Standard entitled "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures." The existing tower is analyzed by placing wind forces on the structure in 300 positional increments around the tower(ie. wind pressure directly onto the tower corners, faces and parallel to the faces). This enables the user to"create"a three-dimensional representation, yielding results for worst case scenarios. In effect, the production of these results allows the user to study the structural integrity of the tower when influenced by wind forces from any direction. The proceeding report includes analysis for the tower with the addition of antenna in the scenarios stated. For clarity, the analysis shall include worst case loadings and a typical elevation view with maximum foundation loads tabulated. Should the client require to be furnished with a full copy of our analysis, we will gladly do so. Codes and Standards ACI - American Concrete Institute - Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (AC/318-95), 1995 AISC-American Institute of Steel Construction-Manual of Steel Design,Allowable Stress Design, 9'" edition, 1989 TIA - Telecommunications Industry Association - TIAIEIA-222-F Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, 1996 IBC 2006 6 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) (rev.2-July 9, 2010) (rev. 3-August 3,2010) (rev.4-August 25, 2010) 5.0 TOWER ANALYSIS RESULTS The tower was analyzed for the existing inventory plus the proposed loading condition. Structural wind speed and ice loads are in accordance with the TIA/EIA-222-F Code. The applicable design values for Suffolk County, New York is: 85 MPH, with no ice applied to the tower members and 74 MPH, ''/z' radial ice applied to the tower members. For Load Case 1, Section Capacity Tables indicating the allowable member and connection capacities are included in the Appendix. All allowable capacities have been calculated to comply with the permitted TIA allowable increases (for wind). All bolts loaded in shear assume the threads are included in the shear plane. Load Case No. 1: The existing tower superstructure with addition of(6) antenna, (12) coax will meet current EIA/TIA design standards. The tower is 91.9%. However, the foundation is a 216%. See included "Section Capacity Tables." 7 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2-July 9, 2010) (rev. 3-August 3, 2010) (rev.4-August 25, 20 10) 5.1 FOUNDATIONS The loads generated from the analysis were compared to the calculated foundation capacity. Foundation capacity was determined by KMCE using non-destructive testing. For details of test refer to foundation report provided by KMCE. KMCE determined the foundations to be T-0"diameter drilled shafts, 18'-6"from the top of concrete to bottom of concrete, with belled areas. Using these dimensions and conservative soil values, KMCE determined that the existing foundation will not adequately support the proposed installation. From our October 2003 foundation investigation, we have assigned a conservative value of 180 K in uplift for this foundation. The present reaction is 195 K which must have a SF of 2 or 390 K. Therefore the foundation is at 216%. 8 MTM SOUTHOLD POLICE STATION-VS-13-281A July 8, 2009 (rev. 1 -Dec. 14, 2009) (rev. 2-July 9, 2010) (rev. 3-August 3, 2010) (rev. 4-August 25, 2010) 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Further to our calculations, we conclude that the tower superstructure with the proposed installation and subsequent equipment conforms to current design standard. The foundation lacks adequate capacity to meet the current design standard. Increase foundation capacity by adding 2 each helical piles (5 plates) at 102 k per foundation. This would bring the foundation to compliance. We recommend that a geotechnical investigation be performed and that a design for reinforcing the foundation be conducted. This report was prepared from tower climb inventory and assumes that the tower was assembled per the manufacturer's specifications and that the tower members and connections are in like new condition. Please do not hesitate to contact or office with any questions or concerns regarding this report. Prepared By: c�'�S AF NO. p7�po Ck�� Michael L. Bohlinger, PE °PROFFssioNP 10 Principal 9 NY License No. 075700 9 7.0 APPENDIX 10 LOAD CASE No. 1 DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING t3o.on TYPE I ELEVATION I TYPE I ELEVATION -_.. {. rain ,100 _... (5)7=MW9enal2'aJ'IAII) 1]0 (31ALPE9Wr(Ve' I ! (�]�amernas1er 130 Im IIz 20NT p eunt(vemon) 1W... va r�1 S Site Foul Suerlofl(1)(ATT) 130 _ (2)20'Whp Aemne IN m !IN H 6Side Mount SlandN(1)(AU) 130 GPSwISMM-oe Mn IN _C 6 Side Mout SIaMA(1)(ATT) 130 (3)ALP{9011 Neo ) ;IN ^, 00010E 15 MV AMenm 130 T VHF DB qM Yep 191 08010E is whip Arter. 130 GreM SN Mount nt(Met o ) 90 080 A 10E 1s who Ant.. .... (2)Hebb 501 sm 10 (Metww) 90 110.0fl 2DM -- 130 (2)Kelhreb p W 10504(Meft )N ._ 3 Dun 130_. 1211canreb-eo0lose(MehoPn) 90 (12)RR65-18- OPL2 Sea 115 Gravid Side Mm Mount(Mftxs) Igo Mounts(T-MMlle) G Side Mm Mount(Mete ) 190 ! 1T Smbr Mount(Vetimn) 100 6 UHF whipMre Mn (4 oeeH) �Je ! IF v. , -- 12S �M rin/etlmn) - 100 ---- McMoll mount Nl Ise _ C Mv ; (3)A P-E-9011(Varum) IN ; MATERIAL STRENGTH _ GRADE Fy Fu GRADE Fy Fu c Asn-so (so 9.; vs w,i___ A3s 36lml saws;.. Scott TOWER DESIGN NOTES 1. Tower is located in Suffolk County,New York. e 2. Tower designed for a 85 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIAIEIA-222-F Standard. 3. Tower is also designed for a 74 mph basic wind with 0.50 in ice. 4. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind. ® 5. Please reference the design apprurtenance loading chart above for what is on the tower. 6. The tower picture doesn't show everything that is listed on the tower. 7. TOWER RATING:91.9% a 70c ft gi J 2 C w MAX.CORNER REACTIONS AT BASE: DOWN: 240K aUPLIFT. -192K 30.0 fl_ SHEAR: 27K toto T® AXIAL !; 55 K\\ SHEAR� MOMENT 3261 kip-R 43 K_" TORQUE 9 kip-ft 74 mph WIND-0.5000 in ICE 100fl AXIAL 36 K 1.. MOMENT - - SHEAR ._..\ 3324 kip-ft w ® 45K J r o0fl _. TORQUE 10 kr'p-R 2 « p REACTIONS-85 mph WIND $ ; m KM Consulting Engineers,Inc. Southold Police Station 32 West Upper Ferry Road Pe0J t_PnbPos9d Metrapcs-Loa01ngg-LC-f Rev_ Ewing, NJ.08628 Client MTM °ee"byUser rw - Phone:(609)538-0400 cMe: TIA/EIA-222-Fer"�08/25/10 $e NTS FAX: 609 538-8858 Pab: 1 oay Ha.E-1 TIA/EIA-222-F -85 mph/74 mph 0.5000 in Ice Leg Capacity Leg Compression (K) 1000 500 <.Minimum 0 Manmum-> 300 -1000 130.00 fI 130 a 1 1100E 110.00 90.00 I _ 70.00 ,.. 700C O A m W i 3o.ao I � 3o.ao 1000 imDO Ow ow 1000 500 <-Minimum OMazimum-> -500 -1000 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc. ° Southold Police Statio., 32 West Upper Ferry Road P1-j d Propwed Mehopcs Loedi.g•LC 1 Rev Ewing,NJ.08628 cibm MTM - -om<m b,U,„ n„•d. Phone:(609)538-0400 °o°a' TIA/EIA-222-F Date:OB/25�'] 3"a" NTS FAX: 609 538-8858 Pad'xw7 -ox9 x'10 E-3 Feedline Distribution Chart 0' - 130' Routs Fki App In Face App Out Fa T,uas Lap Face A Face B Face C MW ,m 11500 _ 115.M 110.00 it 110.00 .., etm o1m SII 90.00 90.00 m.00 � 90.00 yb 70.00 L < J C B _ _ ]0.00 0 1 — N W z E e e woo' o - a, 50.00 g 38.m — MM ' 30.0011. . . _ -__. . 30.00 r to w l low low 10.00 om' ow KM Consulting Engineers,Ina °b'Southold Police Station 32 West Upper Ferry Road R1e""Pru ed Afatropics teed/ -tc f Rev Ewing, NJ.08628 G1181", MTM Dmm by User AW& Phone:(609)538-0400 Cv°eTIA/EIA.222-F °Ha 08125/10 s"b NTS FAX: 609 538-8858 PIM X. na - r- Uaa O'E-7 Stress Distribution Chart 0' - 130' '> 100% 90%-100%175%-90% 50%-75%'<50%Overstress Face A Face B Face C >000 110,00 I i soM so ao i - - -- - --- _ _ k____ 70.M O R d I yi I i 30_00it . �. A � . --- _---- I> aom moo 11 I��, low 000. 0.00 KM Consulting Engineers,Ina Southold Police stedon 32 West Upper Ferry Road °1e""'Fiopos_ed_Afobvpcs Lcedl -Lc 1 Rev Ewing, NJ.08628 Cl"t MTM —by:user IAWd Phom:(609)538-0400 o ' TIN EIA-222-F o"•0&2.5/10_ $t8w NTS FAX: 609 538-8858 P' xw N6 E-8 RISA Tower Job Southold 26 of 27 Southold Police Station KM Consulting Engineers,Ina Project Date 32 West Upper Ferry Road Proposed Metropos Loading -LC 1 Rev F 15:58:02 08/25/10 Ewing,NJ.08618 Client Designed by Phone:(609)538-0400 MTM FAX:(609)538-8858 User Section Elevation Size L L. KI/r F. A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P Po P ft ft ft ksi in' K K pa T7 10-0 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 9.42 9.21 142.1 29.000 1.1391 9.43 33.03 0.286 Horizontal Design Data Tension Section Elevation Size L L. KI/r F A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P Po P ft ft ft ksi in' K K Pa T5 50-30 L21/2x21/2x3/16 13.50 13.17 203.1 21.600 0.9020 0.68 19.48 0.035 v T6 30-10 L21/2x21/2x3/16 15.50 15.17 234.0 21.600 0.9020 0.65 19.48 0.033 v T7 10-0 L21/2x21/2x3/16 16.50 16.15 249.1 21.600 0.9020 0.25 19.48 0.013 Top Girt Design Data Tension Section Elevation Sue L L„ Kl/r F. A Actual Allow. Ratio No. P Po P f ft ft ksi in' K K po TI 130-110 L21/2x21/2x3/16 4.01 3.76 58.0 21.600 0.9020 0.42 19.48 0.021 Section Capacity Table Section Elevation Component Size Critical P SF'P.... % Pass No. .h Type Element K K Capacity Fail TI 130-110 Leg 3 1 -20.38 179.52 11.4 Pass Diagonal L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 8 -4.21 16.76 25.1 Pass 51.1(b) Top Gin L21/2x21/2x3/16 6 -0.44 16.92 2.6 Pass T2 110-90 Leg 31/2 31 -54.47 213.90 25.5 Pass Diagonal L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 34 5.23 11.73 53.1 Pass 75.9(b) T3 90-70 Leg 31/2 52 -95.57 213.90 44.7 Pass 45.8(n) Diagonal L3x3x3/16 55 -6.91 15.12 45.7 Pass 84.2(b) T4 70-50 Leg 4 73 -136.60 319.15 42.8 Pass 78.2(b) Diagonal L3x3x3/16 76 -7.50 11.88 63.1 Pass 91.9(b) T5 50-30 Leg 4 95 -173.61 380.97 45.6 Pass 75.4(b) Diagonal 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 98 -9.26 21.41 43.3 Pass 56.2(b) Horizontal L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 97 -0.69 4.35 15.9 Pass RISA Tower JobPage Southold Police Station 27 of 27 KM Consulting Engineers,Inc. Project Data 32 West Upper Ferry Road Proposed Metropcs Loading-LC 1 Rev F 15:58:02 08/25/10 Ewing,NJ.08628 Client Designed by Phone:(609)538-0400 MTM FAX:(609)538-8858 User Section Elevation Component Size Critical P SF'Pate„ % Pass No. ft Type Element K K Capacity Fail T6 30-10 Leg 4 128 -212.94 380.97 55.9 Pass Diagonal 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 131 -9.77 17.69 55.2 Pass 59.3(b) Horizontal L21/2x21/2x3/16 130 -0.63 3.28 19.2 Pass T7 10-0 Leg 41/4 161 -231.02 441.99 52.3 Pass Diagonal 2L21/2x21/2x3/16 164 -9.72 16.22 59.9 Pass Horizontal L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 169 -0.22 2.89 7.5 Pass Summary Leg(T4) 78.2 Pass Diagonal 91.9 Pass (T4) Horizontal 19.2 Pass (T6) Top Gin 2.6 Pass (TI) Bolt Checks 91.9 Pass RATING= 91.9 Pass Program Version 5.3.1.0-10/3/2008 File:X:/MTM/Southold/Engineering/Southold LCI Rev F.en APPRAISAL CONSULTING REPORT MetroPCS New York, LLC Site Location: Existing Lattice Tower 165 Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000/75/5/14. 1 DATE OF HEARING October 18, 2010 PREPARED FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD Town Hall 53095 Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 PREPARED BY LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. 15 Dewey Street Huntington, New York 11743 (631) 427-1000 LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS 15 DEWEY STREET HUNTINGTON,NEW YORK 11743 (631)427-1000 October 18, 2010 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Appraisal Consulting Report MetroPCS Site #NY 7315 Proposed wireless Communications Facility: Existing Monopole - T/O/Southold DPW Yard 165 Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Date of Report: October 7, 2010 Dear Board Members: In accordance with a request from MetroPCS New York, LLC ( "MetroPCS" ) , I have inspected the above site and prepared an Appraisal Consulting Report (the "Report" ) regarding potential effects of a proposed wireless communications facility (the "Communications Facility" ) on the surrounding community. This report is intended to comply with the report requirements set forth under Standards Rule 5-2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) , subject to limiting conditions and a certification as outlined in the Addendum. After considering the location, market conditions, proposed build, and all other factors that influence value, it is my professional opinion that MetroPCS ' proposed Communications Facility will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area and will not have any adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. My conclusions are outlined in the following Report. Respectfully submitted, LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. By: Michael J. Lynch N.Y.S. Cert. General R.E. Appraiser #46000001012 2 Purpose and Intended Use of Report The purpose and intended use of the Report is to study any possible adverse effects a proposed Communications Facility will have on the surrounding community. This Report is strictly prepared at the request of MetroPCS to present to the Town of Southold Planning Board for a hearing to be held on October 18, 2010. Effective Date of Report The effective date of the Report is October 7, 2010, the date of inspection by Mr. Michael J. Lynch. • Description of Proposed Communications Facility MetroPCS ' proposed Communications Facility consists of, without limitation, the installation six ( 6 ) panel antennas (the "Antennas" ) to an existing 130 ' (AGL) steel lattice tower (the "Tower" ) . The Antennas will be affixed at top heights of 92 ' 3" (AGL) to the Tower. In addition, there will be associated equipment cabinetry mounted on a concrete slab that will be within a fenced compound amongst other equipment shelters and compounds . The Tower was originally constructed circa 1993± and houses wireless communications facilities that includes most if not all of the major carriers such as Verizon Wireless, AT&T Wireless , Sprint/Nextel , and T-Mobile. Hence, the MetroPCS Communications Facility will be a co-location. 3 Description of Property and Surrounding Neighborhood The subject property ( the "Property" ) is within a Residential (R-80 ) Low Density Zoning District, located along the north and west sides of Main Road and Peconic Lane, respectively, in the hamlet of Peconic, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. It is also known and designated by Suffolk County Tax Map Number: District 1000 , Section 75 , Block 5 , Lot 14 . 1 . The Property totals 13 . 07± acres in area and is primarily utilized as a public works yard for the Town of Southold. It is improved with the aforementioned Tower, which is situated at the northwest corner of the Property, plus highway department garages, offices, salt/sand storage buildings, etc . Abutting properties include reserve agricultural lands (grape vineyards ) to the north and west; single-family residences to the east, along Peconic Lane; and commercial businesses to the south, along Main Road, which • include an auto body repair shop. Opposite the Property to the east and south are additional agricultural lands, and at the opposite corner of Main Road and Peconic Lane is a former automobile dealership. Scope of the Report In preparing this Report, the appraiser: - Inspected the Property and surrounding community; - Reviewed the engineering drawings as supplied MTM Design Group; - Reviewed Suffolk County and Town of Southold assessment, tax map, and zoning records; - Researched sales trends in the area of the Property in addition to comparable sites throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties; - Prepared this Report in conformance with USPAP requirements . 4 Report Methodologv In analyzing any potential adverse effect the proposed Communications Facility may have on the surrounding community, the appraiser considered the proposed build of the Communications Facility, the surrounding neighborhood and land uses , zoning classification of the subject Property and surrounding parcels , and existing conditions. In addition, we have reviewed and carried out studies with respect to wireless communications facilities in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, including the East End of Long Island. These communications facilities include monopole sites , lattice and guyed wire tower sites, rooftop mounted sites, and water tank sites. One of those studies of note is as follows: Monopole Antenna Site Keyspan Operations Center Montauk Highway, Bridgehampton, New York. A 1201± monopole was erected at this center circa September 2000. This property is surrounded by residential properties to its north, east and west, and opposite agricultural land to its south. Nearby, at the southwest corner of Montauk Highway and Newlight Lane, is a community of upper- middle priced homes that was first developed in the mid 1980s. This development is partially within view of the monopole due to the open agricultural fields to the east. Our staff compared sales data of homes in the development before and after the installation date of the monopole. Our "before" data, which included six (6 ) sales running from 4/97 to 5/99, was compared with "after" data, which included six (6 ) sales running from 2/01 to 5/04 . The average price per home in the before and after groups was 128% higher for the latter ( $516 , 167 vs . $1 , 179, 000 ) , which 5 breaks down to an average of 29%/year market appreciation. This figure compares favorably with the overall market appreciation of 22%/year tabulated from all single-family homes sales over the same time period for all of Bridgehampton. As such, the antennas or monopole did not appear to lead to a devaluation of nearby property values around the site. Conclusions In summary, we offer the following conclusions: - The proposed Communication Facility is an appropriate use for the Property, given that it will be a co-location on an existing Tower, which presently houses numerous wireless carriers, and will be situated on a large municipal highway department yard. - The Property is well suited for the proposed Communications Facility, given existing conditions, land uses, and zoning in the surrounding neighborhood. - No correlation was found between the presence of wireless communication facilities and declining property values in the studies we reviewed or carried out on communities in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, including the East End of Long Island. - The proposed MetroPCS Communications Facility, therefore, will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area and will not have any adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. ADDENDA !� /� °✓I [ k � ��. �. ,, I r {� �� �, t 'nj I�°'� 'I ,( `��1 8 9�'1 ` r i �,�. i=Fp � �x ga i ►f�� �1 � , I� s ���� t ��, � , p Ne -. }. ��I,• _ _ �� � � � 1 � 1 f'w ::� P4lj.(f/i• ..r ..'gym- v". �4'!j1'i a ��,t •. if� .. i .. �. _ +.. Photo 2: Existing View of Base of Tower and Equipment e _ a Photo 3: View of Subject Property From Peconic Lane t X � iVtt k _ y a Photo 4: Interior View of Subject Property Looking North Towards Tower rva i Photo 5: View of Adjacent Monopole on the Abutting Southold Police Department to South of Subject Property along Main Road ny� 1 k` Photo 6: View of Adjacent Reserve (Vineyard) to West of Subject Property along Main Road, Looking North h � t 9 Photo 7: View of Adjacent Reserve (Vineyard) to North of Subject Property along Peconic Lane \� \ Cf « Photo : Auto Body Shop mSouth of Subject Property along K[Wf Main Road _dRmnic Lane . . . . . � .a . . . .y. . . . Photo 9: Vacant Auto Dealer Opposite Subject Property to mks q PecocLane and Main Road s: Photo 10: View of Abutting Homes to East of Subject Property along Peconic Lane � k 1 Photo 11: View of Southold Rec. Center Opposite Subject Property to East along Peconic Lane - -- ----------- o Lite rsrw (� y ar. uww + m uve + .J�> � .P a •q .Lq .� �,pJ as a> J M © qq �.P •a .. , a q I un ♦ W un. nvm I.�J N10p w.. wv. ♦ u o -N-I W wM w P CD OPei� lop V Y. 6 q b ' ♦ W .> g JJ I.yy � L4ul ;I 'J ww.M6 a , _ ♦ W a wgw.wu rw�w. re.n ,q� dY r r.rw r wLiww CCIMTY OF $IiFCLN •° w•• SdIi1gL0 npu w MwO.Y.O11q W P �o.wnA�r? srda r�wrtr � „r. 075 INN r u - - - - - - - - GROU ARCHITECT 1 Eoa wc.,��nE� ore E N G I NEER I S HAZLET,NEWJERSEY 15 � r: a.eee.e210zLo ro - F 732,847.4335 ~� i 1 u 1 e - Ii FesicevreL�ry � ° Ff4 .�� ¢z I I I I o... rto vaa=an owre I s oa M"ows xonrev ox " ,+FS sx Lv rw. Soo. RADU155 °F I I � � F'ROPER'Y OWNERS LIS' I I ca +.i I I t 1~ 1 vr�� R_80 1 I zeea scnLe m 41 /L i 3 I / mEtroPC i P 1 _ ,° (IXIST.SCE RT2SMAIN ROAD NIC BYWA — y rte°' 'i N IGF NN' I T ° I m EGON . 1 �D OWN OF SOU74 U R-Bo' LOT NUMBER LEGEND: / b. TOP NUM.-SECTION MID.NUM =BLOCK ¢AMUS MAP ° WRROU BOTTOM NUM. LOT itiFOrzt�a.T' R-401 FES RNTµLOY1 �500' RADIUS/ yIC�'TY/ KEY MAP °ee u p, .mac xamm Y-Al W - DGa °y za sb ue.^.imm m' a�Tace'� 4.7 i 09MPST5008 M .LOT PRE - CG.5005 59+.0 ZONING INFOFZIATION Il2J ITEM 12yI1F[p EXISfIHS 9„F. ,�E D E S I G a N. �=T� . A PSEF — � � G R O U RGVy TARO SETBATMT 00 'D Fi Bgb9 F' p s [rqR�B=_-eAc o -A a49. - ARCHITEC71 9 wA .50 : ENGINEERI Ills o rAw s=-Bl �o F 2�1 Fr. e3 FT— o HA�LE[P 0. BOX 3 JERSEY 95' T 1059�! 20.47 R K A REA4 4 5ETSI 'AN11M1 1 I IT . _ i 534T.0�. T: 733.688.6310 Ill R5 a .a¢OSEre tEw e;-1 -5 F Iao FT we Fr � F:7)1.6Q.{33f �11LAp�45 PE ACE ]9% i 060% V —•77ig mp14C6Y'pMSFPC GM11MIcnnpBTW�IC Ip('q}ry [pX Mry,LC%yi55 P6 Y081% CQA STIrvr A4EnFT ryn - cgr @:ErsTra w1-ca1oRnrr NG BZT AR SRJP”VN<FEF-ORMFD. �O'�c0. ���SACK ` -eJM 4Q ii iP'i5 uwOZM/.-c �� I 40c�q� Iw p I IO Iw NmtNAW.i MD iAKEk FRP+ OLOMNS � NY�0M1.1 nr�6W -A�RAwuTT.m 1111 RAn.FREPn4x a✓ '' al�tw=s I 3� e�__ m_ M 6uuw� � B sYx sAL.c.ax OArE..xrcBER Al -- -A0C1W T. 5rER^.fAEPY+S d 4„EL GOMFiM'G Oh59 LLIAMF �f'I I ^if I _IEA. A4UNTE5315 rElNrq.CGv \ �..c.•e ue�.anervc..� wa re.sE-.u:E 733 JArEo, 1TE 6A5REYEMS TK My ( 12 pEI ROF IG 'grE'IS•ON<IOq Y� '§�-'_�.E] �-� r/\^ IT I E+sr�rvs az.�xO ■ ei oPC i or r I � I� �• c4'NY�315 _= X4'405 ROUE .z4 , a n5j e'`� 5 d i4EM.p 8 ,i PEGON G. TOWN OF SOIiOU T!-' /S x�� Io w 5 Tnov BIBr -_ MAIN 1704D — ZONING NFO¢MA IT u9 CL6K_ ^>GQ PMO 7 '1 RISE — r wu0 .Ism-Q OBAH/10 —/ 24.90544E 1 <-5.0` TRT 09NP5'S00H — vv v_ OXs G oO vv1 ccw,F,FnJ y ��A L on -ON 4a ANY aMf 2115-N5 orcn -` x450 EAB'JJf 6RAOf IM 4 _ 41 9]O' .s-w er-Rs.-Ia4nA57Ee ANTEXXk 'I SESmR DESIG E'.9r NONES,1MP,4'EgN� LtiO 9' _ E 9T'W f2 X:G.SE_E G R O U - OT'E'STwTaRRIGwTEROT S LAT+I�+m R - �. EcsT PusL.Axrswas rA..o Y/ ARCHITECTI E N G I NEER [ L 1=0'o rmw eznoe�- nL w�rorec A.o' P.O. BOX 3 HAZLET,NEWJERSEY A.nwr.cax usdT v LENTER6EIS AlIAv1EMUshroB.FJ _ � � � 1� is]33.181.6]10 AN..15'.O't AEGVE 614L£ — / PRWP"£0TT, P(F PAIEL� @\,\\�,, I TE—EX SEGT4R Y >A F])2-lQ.U95 EV ST NIS^0.LE W P MTENFAS— TXNI 'JX M TO EN IT i RgcF.-nLASEp TOE E — 1 r,¢vfn1 a.a �OEMfR O�IX Si N6 AVIEMJA NRQOV� _ \ 1�-0"!b1vE G44f Illi -� w a rvaP artwrP s AMcwus "i '•' r� A� .A w ti\ 1 O11A -T90OR!�JEfAST1NO vE PGSM ..5._ J �{ {' £GT^v4 � 1 +O ISPA PPGP.XET+ x1 wE ti,, -3 - - �ANTEVAA ORIENTA'�ON PLAA - sFLTce a imw Ox XOA Eb T ��I Imo_ n X4E T9. '£S N9MFD'O EXII 45 Y _E6 x�S 11(a \/ A4E 5i +FIM/.S OXICR -� ]6v%Y✓lE 5_ IaMLIm.W ]nbne W.'!. ANTENNAS TO EE NX IYYry I II T M+PE I E!.I IS MN-AWueepN+L �I'A'1 W �y I..MAr p-EE SHn1I cpR 'I✓7PO5� i�Al EX III940SASE.F \4i GLM P".V6E'SAI+4f I ENFp 11lK GAUGE T. S4CIL44.AVALTE516PLQ' -{-} 7 OR KNK ipEA O pi 01 O 6 XSEG V PI4 IROPOSEO HERO M5 fUAZIAL / ExIzt.AtO FROP0 A : / v wn�mrcw.m nPrvcvn GA&£51ipPE0 i➢iO/fR ON V i P.A'E 114 a a\"-.I +� WAMTVa +1_+47'.£5 LR R EJ 4E+oO PGE COAx AL ENI 9 ADLERET STO. E KF %PE ry 9.718.E nEc W5 ..SES RWEm AD151QIY!.491.5 - P AM y AV✓0.`xFfi S1 0 &tlWE l�OPAL Arz-1 / � sroi B9LT FJR rz o PI=E .-EIN R(R6fSJ AI IS SAE WT 1�1 nP `l NAST 4G5 AN NAI641.SEE NET,9/ ^WMEp-O GMLE.1"I" / 5-1,5 a MIP ANTENNA 6R0.t0 EAQ `1TLR I- 1.OE-.1E 2 ] - l c4wum AI PLs Izo so C4Ev— wlvax9n PRDro�v IERc sao" \ I� sA1slr�v M'P AMfMN / GPS ANTENNA DETAIL �wmro RE-Is9Evti PRt1 71SEE LrK211IOa EFTA naE A- ��� TW lY_£WIIV,S]'S 9 F'4 LETNLS NONE �/ 3ArSp SCALE rz ©• p 2110 sEVED 49 PRllln O_2 LT L.TT AI16 ALLED 14 E:1'INS 9MUMTE%Ip.EWPENi II ARCM NOT 5 OR GLAem. K Ga vpM 0Locw NATEv A17H IIT -1 .e.. DA,r ,u°M NILTT CQPAXT 1 / FIXICAINEM -AI i4E Ix'MLJR KONJ 1 >n of rovER T.G' KA EMSTre EU MRI xiII,-1111 / � Dxf {vc 1 I�� \\ E E NNl ER EOJMIEM NNN 0//" 743 PC Ea151 W'b'NW LXAF LI4V / I' S1£'ER(pTOMERh: Mc 3�/2' �.P. L n �MLEN @AREFD HI@ � �fIETIW TOWH[fO3bATON, Ibl�♦ ` Igb RFpJT ATE NOIqI'EE IX1991HT A4RCF 6RA9f Z �/ 11 �T IExrFWsi, N '315 I _ Ex1ET11Yr fpJIREMTJ I / 11 S`EiIEA(EY O1rtAEl / AE PHAE EA.RMI AVA.T2 ASSET R-FRBMEDBT 41 �'�a�' mabEm LArosc`ENOES Ev rs WNBL,AELL EISII VL f3rES L-1 F A ERo.NFn1+L5.,: '44C5 ROVE OEa30M 'REATEEAAllN FE LIGEIGE•08 W11 IESRI 11 A1SNNENT ➢zs 0 5.3061 PwvnESS., a,3 to mn Ai rI TA x5rolr �I PEGONIG. NY EOJIPMENILPEpANINI TOWN OF SOVTH i AIIELRVIiA£5 GR MFOJE 2 I 1 tR4bEv FY MM pL.6 6RpP_K.PO.EOs 5 I3 T X1 OIl9O. I 1 ATEE lYE L A,-S/L-S; / I EN=PLR ME 6EXTNEXIS 'A-0 naX LA+M£LG1ER NEET 1 nPFIE- RovNwsO.TMOLD 1T ANT, KSOUIT.EeS LgLpISn� 7Zt,, 9 ELSLRIL EXIST'. GE I IYE FIE--GF TI A 3]]-E E�AV'A N AEI"I'll"L5 RLOPp11ACYDER EVIEN NM19R£9XI`P1(SpRAD AL GENM F%+NE P LOMFE0.Lnp YAPALE IO PROPo'.£D cocPOa¢ .ce ONE 7CX O TN AMEWU.G-OAEI 1rn I Tl.NSP I OEELNNEOPLE.IXNEML / 0.:MTOE ITN Pf -NAW TN AMH5Lp515MATION,YE1@ MINE'S £OMD TO BE 16N TNTIUX TE L.VKitt OF ONE EVIETINS PLAN H D'ETP NXE 5y KVNIEpp PHLRAL9 ISLATINED IE%NVA TBRVEg!tl SET ON ANNE TA AXLICRfDTO GPGREIE%AB(i a7 S7.E+ IMf iptR FOl9AT:GV.AS mEON5ET6 R.WI{E ANE LETAILS lcASE AREA, `aaE.wwlvev urmeR snAureLoa =RGPvi v�Ew j'ID ✓IEC DOm NOR'N -0,LER E_EVA'ION ;ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS PM YALE /[ F ��Z xuE. v.m^ OB/18/10 ilninmar� 09MPST5008 2 LRL �OKWf O aq Nrw_011 T B G+ Rv I11 A P'xJLE VwGOMPJ�E.YA rO NFvr^'E'W KS � , - -_ -_�:.•� '. __ -. DESIGSWhD r0 wLPoYD 6RTMC i � IWT GROU 1,Ex14fLGO FEOM�x 4nK }Lr✓Y.E?AM'fYr COMFWXO ` � � i LY GMhEE.`P�EAS r �i —� -- � \ ARCHITECT[ ( r E N G IN E E R [ v'vxmw •� Ex<-ixs s.x.F ( - P.O. BOX �x,TAw.T oh aF 19f-=a as Ea.F.mr '"`OR-FA's' ' ' a ' w.s-vfnAx cvzre u+c cAx wa r£ HAZLEi, 32.SMRBEY ¢E"'OIFn FaGn fRL^E¢T"fY}NOARFi. ~��` � # T' ]33.889.6310 F.]33.91],4335 1 E .N6 xRtF£mr NE � V E 5 WWF 19Y O�; wWTPM� !RO GS AVE. 'Wf0`S.D ME% (b ti•:L RWu 1`P.F r£R %[sqy R4K. YfcYXA 4RPdi R�5 41H1E0 Ex4 LYER /(ALL\x t namEo o s vs orev Sbi sEE E Ors fLVL41� ' { L Ex 4�W 3'<X6X F i I INA LAn4f xi PRLMYSO M'FO W5 cLAn r e N,'.c&E5 Rg11Ep I TO ON - 1 LABLE:MOPR \ so'c-AnLw FewE �rNw.r NJ.IR;BY TIER6/� EVSTINbA E. ^•G96_EO TPO PG A h \ d' I CAA'f4 POPflO Il NE 49E �� � r � I Fvaa�nem f �- .1PAaE cexE h. f 1 1 smxcxr11-T llsEE v srz+; �� Ll 1145i_� Ex15"M6'RSx cluv.'K + IE N, ' .. �,- a rvx1EL FI'I-. __ . 1006 �6 ¢Fp11REnExSar E ( d GS'G/b 1E O FPGPONE� J O W�p� Yi.IttPOLE Fjq .YB'I ( ,J „RY PC L ' _ ( xETva Pcs ro� cawaw� � 9 % L- Pawassv' roLE \ `�I Ivow ca+oia. � 3bw Ya1lyr• i i 1 Ex 51 E iI �I (alpµ-rzn r s»E�T�m+oTas�( 6 ���I �I ( Emnxb wwA�-Axe •aLPcsm rEmo Pcs 6'o zi ' r• .w crul weE �� V j v-A-1 �xsrx6 mu9ATLR ! 9AFmm WrsE w - __ Sd Aoo•E L—Ex 5r N5 G966A&NfT ReOap4£O IEIRO PLN i`�ar �- - cAdxns mm.1 4,w,mrtoa ��� 4140E ROJTE Ezsrw unLn 1•1 ^En s*EA LSAwncam-o cEGONI G, NY wcao�oNE, PLs.n IIT CABi¢z'I- 15 I- m9vovoseo�res✓eOm OF V MJMIFO RI h£W 5'E£L RHL]YYi GRAD •O FNO/P+210'r M'IgXLREiE !I.k1. Fp6v:.5y a.O'WT{K(E5N 6,41E WT.BAIEEO WIC Ar' J b.Fr(EANf AQEN (M 6.D.SAh^�Sibh rbrGE rO BE PL/LE'J Oh FBGf(NL maPOEEO Lervx,vixb NLREExiN6AVOlYO�9WJ - pEreLS vvz� PARTIAL S.T PG9 FPRLEp FWIPnfH' INff V}RL11.1+OEl . •cGPONfD xE1P0 PL5 AL GA9iXEr Wir Ll6rrt W^JN'__ _.. ApyAVIiAE5 G4AMAOJEO E3AL fiAiL 3/.-91 EGE(IIP�ENT PL 1 WOPONfD iAYG'.GIR i6 10+1- APOJNO'E.RO PCS FNKEC 2 EyiFFEM(Fh IL•INriM♦gELFVir46 Qt AR40`F.J CfiAL Y �+ DIFWf R C AL f9L Z-9) DGa F41RT IAL 5 TE P—4\ ��EQLIP`9EV' PLAK PMm z — / trITSLALE ^Tq�- 09MP=TSOOH PRaPr D B'TWO .a I w e s-AB ATNF I RMA 6.585 m Rf-ABRG sff .� : D E S I G RAxs FfR Z s1 CP DBE"6NTLY CRJEXEo R,Bf AIRED a � G R O IIAVATXIETIIM,DE , \- - �✓E ELL D EN!ERLI4E OE SbxI ARCHITECTI ENG I NEER [ P0. BOX3 (70 w RSB-.ve_=.Asrc HAZIET,*b EBSEY - NOTICES , Z�mL A is 732.888.6210 a ' metroPCS LE EI MX E F>I3.8Ii 4335 PADA REDYENCY AMEfU9 AT ✓ WNrt BPGK6RDND TN6 BITE PLEASE EXEnCBIE CWIpX KKR_E••'RS L451E9 t0¢E BA5=_ SRO aMOES AIgURD ANTEMIAB DO WT BGND� fnsIDw 0m5riRZED / }lNFWNr OF AH1EMXAB ' .RGI"s°'.L '--� ''I Network Opernlbn Center &IT Bcu.E.-t-eB6slzlTn , l �1 CONCII SLAB DE-A'L ^ IGN DETAIL 3 SAFETY NOTICE SIGN 11,11wAE. 314 . m sem rz' v m= %'X4F. -..^v %EL1�3" '_y �/ ]Gr96 AE 6•. '.9" Ly Matl�.AIA Ytln[W.T tpRu.AtlN¢01•..9b'r1 Xi+AW EOUIPMEYT GA2INET LEGEND wwcsfD.re 1.r AB'O'%D}'�IS/16V Ns-INa �cv.aeemTe.n>nrn�n 6 vA D 1F 0, PRwcEO x 15;16 x E6 PE MI'MDJ.YIEp OA GABLE9RI.1A,m CAL 3-1132' 03-113/16'xX,-TN6 OF 1 R..Tc DE1AiL 3,Z-I, 3O PRC6ffD BA�ERv iA91HEr /\ P&FOSEC R/{DEE/`L 611 ODEL SBb s'GR W 3 6 ]f Lc ,x 316 L� W. D CAL TWIgl L(n 1101'SEUND 'ROPpaFD'ALWJxr GAEL£ LiGIrt Hryl,11'a Q+ IiIRE I'NS 9E 0.iYGED.FIMLIE LC \ 'ROFO:ED&''-RV LPBf �BRID6E AY£IBLY M WYE FAIWI DGARE V'IA TTALLED OVER TIE }'_a 3/a 3'eE/16' A�VP2 .1 PROVIDE ✓AR-AI P4 _DERU SAIED,NALM IfITfl MAXM. 9-0"O.Y TWATTOGITI' DC -1LFTL A P J UT VII I I LOT,I4 lNO MI TFT II C57E-M PoRJT$AT ANGLES � ZL WDIM 4EI5�AED AS PRaI \ BENEEN°d'i.'B.M F4 I.II-LIWr.E'"ITIW PART LP '111.1RE), "� L OBNB/IO IS%JE F AS FILA. Lw A.,GABLES FpLpOEE'J MFPO PI 11 O..T Ox NNSRVr R4M1E ' RWTEp Al.LASE MI TO GALVANI}ED P05r rvix�IGxr PG+Fni I q5f 6RATINS DA R2E XAMPR$ PpLPOSED EOIPMENr GABINES PN D� EROPP£D ID'O /-NEN-A.APNB (LTE,I MIIR T L R BIO/ I,VIU) \ SGR4xIW OI STgL FMN¢NOI TO UvIL'RER PAD O — ,ATLNEWif b A metroPC I.i eAT M nLnl ox Le.+ER Nw rBIBF i q sfr cP(B)srAu x�ti\ p ea mus efrWff // exvFw.em.. vB vwr w TRE N 151 "Nlal.u.0 ' FwN sues¢ARarm ruf. ' � RwovE%.RLAP� � ] � s�41405 ROUTE rw,2 DE vmTeu_. �i Ls "OF Op, OU 11 r� TCO TOWNN 0OF SOUTH 1 —E%Sr.W L AGL"A. 4 .. 'I VA..TV xBr WA,s .EIII. FOJPx6 LSE, d=. VIAA EWTN$ ,� D>=—A L DIA AHGMRS'OR YMIFY 4'z,nW POJi FtlSN GRADE MDAIrIK TO SLAB VA- TO REwI'PAOrN'. \\ /l P -P STEEL BEAM / PROPW1D e'PCK �_-V wcPasfD cow.41f 5LId� 1TfM1 B/"DA M.,,, rO FF le' (5fE ryrnl vz-51 cRLsxED sroue BASE eELOW'FEf m+w uNDlsrLaBFt Bwnm. DGa �1C45LE BRIDGE DETA'L !TREE =L_ANTING DE'AIL ,�T"FI CAL EQLI FI'IENT ELEVAT.O', 4 ,•uA:.E w .v-m' � u.n xA F nra __— ]e,Eb x NFBWn muE � . 711-8-Irz _m" Ob/IH/IO am*mxera.- 09MP�TSOOH CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1 . the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2 . the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3 . I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4 . I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5 . my engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6 . my compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7 . my analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8 . I made a personal inspection of the property on October 7, 2010 that is the subject of this report. 9 . no one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. Michael J. Lynch, Cert. N.Y.S. General Real Estate Appraiser LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal report has been made with the following general assumptions: 1. No responsibility is assumed for the legal description or for matters including legal or title considerations . Title to the property is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated. 2 . The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. 3. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed. 4. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no warranty is given for its accuracy. 5. All engineering is assumed to be correct. The plot plans and illustrative material in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property. 6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering • studies that may be required to discover them. 7. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. 8. If the site is improved with a dwelling built prior to 1978, lead paint may be present and should be checked by an expert as per Title X, the Federal Disclosure law regarding lead hazards. 9. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless a nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. 10 . It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report is based. 11 . It is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in the report. LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS (continued) 12 . In this appraisal assignment, the existence of potentially hazardous material used in the construction or maintenance of the building, such as the presence of urea- formaldehyde foam insulation, and/or the existence of toxic waste on the premises, has not been considered. The appraiser does not assume responsibility of existing potentially hazardous materials and it is recommended that a qualified expert be engaged to inspect as required. 14. It is assumed that any debris, junk, abandoned personal property, etc. that may exist will be removed from the site. The appraisal report has been made with the following general limiting conditions: 1. This is an Appraisal Consulting Report, which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standard Rule 5-2 of USPAP. Supporting documentation concerning the data, reasoning, and analyses, if not detailed in the report, is retained in the appraiser's file. The information contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and for the intended use stated in this report. The appraiser is not responsible for the unauthorized use of this report. 2 . The distribution, if any, of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate allocations for land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 3. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and in any event only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety. 4 . The appraiser herein by reason of this appraisal is not required to give further consultation, testimony, or be in attendance in court with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have been previously made. 5. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the appraiser. LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. MICHAEL J. LYNCH Certified N.Y.S. General Real Estate Appraiser #46-1012 QUALIFICATIONS Real estate appraiser since 1981. President of Lynch Appraisal Ltd., located at 15 Dewey Street, Huntington, New York 11743. Appraised various types of real property on Long Island, New York City and Westchester County including multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, commercial property, factories, warehouses, R & D buildings, office buildings, large residential estates, residential and commercial subdivisions, boat yards, and special-use properties. Prepared appraisals for use in estates,estate planning, feasibility studies,condemnation proceedings,tax certiorari, and matrimonial matters. Specialized in testimony such as area or use variances for properties. Applications have included proposed wireless communications sites,fast food establishments, convalescent homes, service stations, multi-family residences, new construction, etc. Appeared as Expert Witness: Nassau County Supreme Court. New York Supreme Court. Town of Babylon Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Babylon Planning Board. Town of Babylon Town Board. Town of Brookhaven Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Brookhaven Town Board. Town of Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Huntington Planning Board. Town of Huntington Town Board. Town of Islip Town Board. Town of Islip Planning Board. Town of Riverhead Planning Board. Town of Riverhead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Smithtown Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Smithtown Town Board. Town of Southampton Planning Board. Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Southold Planning Board. Town of Oyster Bay Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Oyster Bay Town Board. Town of North Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Hempstead Town Board. Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Bayville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Brookville Board of Zoning Appeals. Appeared as Expert Witness (cont.): Village of Cedarhurst Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of East Hills Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of East Rockaway Board of Appeals. Village of Farmingdale Board of Trustees. Village of.Farmingdale Planning Board. Village of Floral Park Board of Trustees. Village of Freeport Planning Board. Village of Freeport Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Garden City Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Garden City Board of Trustees. Village of Garden City Planning Commission. Village of Great Neck Plaza Board of Trustees. Village of Great Neck Estates Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Hempstead Personal Wireless Services Facilities Review Board. Village of Lattingtown Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lawrence Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lynbrook Board of Trustees. Village of Malverne Board of Trustees. Village of Massapequa Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Matinecock Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Mill Neck Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Mineola Board of Trustees. • Village of Munsey Park Board of Trustees. Village of New Hyde Park Board of Trustees. Village of New Hyde Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of North Hills Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Muttontown Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Old Brookville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Old Westbury Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Oyster Bay Cove Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Oyster Bay Cove Board of Trustees. Village of Oyster Bay Cove Planning Board. Village of Port Washington North Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Rockville Centre Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Roslyn Board of Trustees. Village of Roslyn Harbor Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Sea Cliff Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Upper Brookville Board of Trustees. Village of Upper Brookville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Valley Stream Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Westbury Board of Trustees. Village of Westbury Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Williston Park Board of Trustees. Village of Williston Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Asharoken Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Huntington Bay Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Islandia Board of Trustees. Village of Lloyd Harbor Board of Trustees. Village of Lloyd Harbor Planning Board. Village of Lloyd Harbor Zoning Board of Appeals. Appeared as Expert Witness (cont.): Village of Northport Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Northport Board of Architectural & Historic Review. Village of East Hampton Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lindenhurst Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lake Grove Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Bellport Board of Trustees. Village of Patchogue Planning Board. Village of Port Jefferson Board of Trustees. Village of Quogue Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of The Branch Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Head of the Harbor Board of Trustees. Village of Westhampton Beach Board of Trustees. City of Glen Cove Planning Board. City of Glen Cove Zoning Board of Appeals. City of Long Beach Zoning Board of Appeals. EDUCATION Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York: BBA - Management(1983); MBA - Banking & Finance (1991). TECHNICAL TRAINING Appraisal Institute Real Estate Appraisal Principles - Exam#IA-1. Basic Valuation Procedures - Exam#IA-2. Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part A, - Exam#IB-A. Capitalization Theory and Tech. Part B, - successfully challenged Exam #1 B-B. Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation - successfully challenged Exam#2-1. Standards of Professional Practice, Part A (USPAP) - Exam #1410 Standards of Professional Practice, Part B - Exam #II420 SURVEY OP PROPDRT)r S4�rUAXI'E /N- SO'L[TI FOLD TIOW'JT'rO(F S/�OlrZ�'d-T/ COLD NOW Oft FORMERLY 539.76' rexro SrUP2=0LK LO 1.�1V 1 1 , TCR'W YORW TOWN OF SOLLIHOLD I.6'9 0.9'it SCTM#1000-75.5-14.1 .�.,Rg BUIfDINON AREA=534,371 SQ FT W s.a'SouTH [146°42'20 1. 12.27 ACRES CA I.EAST INC. TOWER CHAIN GNK FBN� N rtxte ° ■ •CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND •< s e,SOUTH gOUTN BWO. IANWIu4eC"' W ONINIWR i6WE (0lIW'N01w IO.yB Q vE A.E$ ud en 0 100' ulRnr Ip X 30' GENfIlANR ' W ' 18N1Y LINXPN� W I�x0.IXDY CGNEWE 9tNEt0Ap.OUxN W I EEDO bl O P ~C 1Z1 E O b 6p uxnm (E43 Egpi Gp� N'A _____________________ _ ME i �, ¢s• , IIi A I uxexry o•e 1 j arou"ceroE NOW OR FORMERLY I RD ELAINE KOKKINOS it I, MARINA TSOKANOS STEVEN TSOKANOS IroNroE,E M 9P.VIE 11.9'aRBr I 'vuMX4 MEE1II Q` O 10.6'1 ]VP' �rxuBa EwRluEa I ASPHALT OG NOW OR FDRMERLY ImuxT " �l i DRIVE 'I of�E V ELVNE.LATY.A:: xmB "buS i•EB"'T I 1 [ ` •wi NCdItBER I 1 i iT C `'99ax i am Ei �IR`p 45{ H55056'00"E 256.09' 58.6' o T A I BrcRw.w T eElxzar sA la•w 18. qp 4; i 'b �Ixlte ElfPa 00G +EI• I wAtR urnm 6 9n.r ""��'• '1� _._._, KKE1 �' 19100.Y aN5CN.UYB111101Hu' AMRNNn •nr I ,1ro ?AK1:IN6 �+Rau ❑ i Pur xrow RMu 1 tooRAM! \ -""1 T4.1' A MD n.r aur 911NE '" mwn x e AA 1 - O CONCRETE O leas 9r art r NxE tTi rotay9. , I ATI c SHED __— ---------- _-- x9x[9 ��,T�— e. 9.a• >iv 43.3' O \1J tML iw FEME .wR i ��� 61 1:a '8e IN I eeµB COIHPEY9 1800.MAOEN' p ME cuuoE _ ..— arx £xQ .a P N FR%A 41-WT 'P i l r ryAN6 .L/ WnIN 11 ` ASPHALT DRIVE _ —J� +clullx�"�""' IEENm.ux•9 / 'e14rU""s 5.3' w.r 31]' +/�— 344.84' 'anlulue\ A.as EetuR 1 Ov .548°401rw I Q ?i 9 uwN 11 GAR 1.8'N wum s qEM VKLA N E 56.1' W aax rB.r yT �}d N O yQ Asx `uxEe..aNS48 04'308 E'n ,.EN axe MexeEnmy 0 W S O ° 55£ °S•' a ( 152.84' uNttY ONNENKA)1oM I 1 O I 0, O R EBMY 0.�CA 9)' NDW 00.'RAIREY o9r UT 9EMRy-0 NMIVVARl ` ASPHALT I O I N W W 1 testy auenxc y I DRIVE I [y' \ Awn avw 1•.\O 9° fas¢PLR.EZAR'L� ENMrx uw: 1 NOW OR FORMERLY N O C gq\ uuury MF0 ill 5f rr>amxr' Ix.xnErt I 1 FORMERLY I CNARLES SLAMA I 'f! BSE 6r �Oe Ip997 I wxu 1 i NOW OR ,C•e b Ee1�NEr. SAO L` 59.9' I `� i JD ANN PERRY SJ 2" E \� Now oR roRMERtY 'V w scx0.0EOER 0.08E0.T !+ - Ijl IILOEOro¢ r J N I B.rn \ h7 1'04.05' OEM OX O o.re I O 00 NW 848 aa'w V 3 I I I O 39 1 50 I k roEA,NI wax 81.64' ME 848°40'00.w 177.84' D ROA b ,s, MAIN �yww § . ' ENRG zEDn3rswmox DR ww+aNronmauRvev �4,'�4+NA,y, { r"3�-•1p' Tj Ia ANOurlrn0ad4ti1pvlxaeExervYaN score uw ' y�,e.'�i l mvEsoPxxmaurver walrorwswxomElAxD almexrma /'V'.LLI"l�e gCER1PICATq PoNOKAlE9XETEEOX R��'�y� BINLLRIINM.YtOTEPEABVNFO0.MpYilI aURVEV IBPREPRP9n `2ryuYR 1p�e.y {P„ } FEET= N601N1HTR0N1ENWxNFJAUlPEr.eOWENtY..MON%I2°WTIIMlENABfµ9WANWEE9NGV YY� l..A 6Fw •' OROFAIIFICAipN9A0E + �M-Y'y114xRIRMd _ °°eI W41"a V,m aRBu,Eammr JOHN GALLACHER OINfxAONYpW.Y xEAEMFRrrKalA0at0.0.Ylef#TONa/A91gT W^AnME GSBIE vaP�.Ejr x W.M::0"YN1 LAND SURVEYOR 0 99ugVEY.E,20EF8Er _ N _ "'""ro"1Pflq`"" - --59 FLORENCE DRIVE e Nexroxr,e PRee9Bee ArTNErae oa xx xecwromeaxwmrlENEma TEV Ncarlen �x°A'iewnREiu - - MANORVILLE, N.Y. 11949 pOtlfh `'E" '°Ip u'°.w J E °NTMu, SURVEYED: OCTOBER 30 ,2003 — -- - (631 ) 874-0400 worarY.YxE EaurlDxe ar eEeeRarm DN R x»IranlwAv m BUPnowEnromeaunYErw, DBTNE INmRuau.Yre SUBSOIL INVESTIGATIONS 7. SOIL MECHANICS [ GDDE MK9 99UUE1D 114 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD, L. I., NEW YORK 11783 1414 (5161 221-2333 • FAX (5161 221-0254 January 25,2010 K M CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Re: 130 Ft. Self Supported 32 West Upper Ferry Road Triangular Tower Ewing,NJ 08628 41405 Highway 25 Att: Linda J. Bailey Peconic,NY Our Job#10-040 Dear Ms. Bailey: Forwarded herewith are copies of the log for drilling work completed at the above referenced site. One(1)test boring was drilled to a depth of 27 feet in an effort to provide the soil characteristics at the site. A 2"diameter, 2'0"long split spoon sampler was advanced into the subsurface by the use of an automatic 140 lb.hammer with a 30" drop. From the drops of the hammer,blow counts required to advance the split spoon sampler over each 6" interval were recorded and are shown on the boring logs. Split spoon samples were taken every 5 feet thereafter to the final depth. Our investigation revealed that the area drilled is blanketed by 3 feet of fill, underlain, generally, by a moderately dense to dense, coarse to fine sand formation with traces of silt and gravel extending to the deepest depth drilled. Natural ground water was encountered at a depth of 14'4"below existing grade at the time the boring was taken. All soils below the fill will satisfactorily support foundation loads of 2 tons per square foot and exhibit excellent drainage characteristics. With respect to seismic,the site is classified as Category"D" according to the International Building Code (IBC) and New York State Building Code. TEST BORINGS. GROUND WATER DETERMINATIONS. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS.HOLLOW STEM AUGER BORINGS LABORATORY ANALYSES. CONTROLLED LANDFILL. DIAMOND CORE DRILLING .SAND d GRAVEL PROSPECTING SEARING VALUES. WELL POINT INSTALLATIONS.ENGINEERING SUPERVISION .PERCOLATION TESTS SANITARY INVESTIGATIONS. UNDISTURBED SAMPLING.TEST PITS.TOP SOIL ANALYSES SOIL MECHANICS DGIOLM & 99)aGI 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD. L. L. NEW YORK 11783 (5161 221-2333 • FAX 15161 221-0254 K M CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. January 25,2010 Aft: Linda J. Bailey Page 2 Frost penetration in this area is 3 feet. All exterior foundations should have a minimum of 3 foot of cover. The angle of internal friction of the natural sand is 34°. Soil samples recovered during drilling operations will be stored in our lab for a period of 30 days after which they will be destroyed. During this period we will deliver these samples to any prescribed location upon request. If after you examine the enclosed you have any further questions,please feel free to call and discuss them with us. Billing is enclosed. iarI ry truly yours, SOHANICS DRILLING CORP. CV:mlf Vernick Encls. President •LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPRe Type: Approved Project Type: Site Plans Status: Final - Pending Inspection SCTM # : 1000 - 75.-5-14.1 Project Name: MetroPCS NY, LLC at Police Station Address: 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic Hamlet: Peconic Applicant Name: Dan Olmetti MetroPCS New York, LLC Owner Name: Town of Southold Zone 1: R-80 Approval Date: 11/15/2010 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 11/17/2010 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: SC Filing Date: C and R's : Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCANNED DEC 2 1 2010 SCAN Date: Records Management 51TE INFORMATION: ZONE: R-50 LATITUDE: N 41" 02' 21.00" NAD 85 LON61TUDE: W --12" 21' 30.51" NAD 55 D E S I G N GROUND ELEVATION: 16' AMSL (NAVD85) et P EXI5TIN6 USE: "B" BUSINE55 AND "U" UTILITY O G R O U P FROF05ED USE: SAME USE, NO CHANGEC R A R C H I T E C T U R E LOT SIZE: 561,442.11 5F / 15.01 ACRES New York LLCENGINEERING TOTAL LEASE AREA: 160 50. FT. ■ . . . P. 0. BOX 3 I HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 FDRAWINC3 L15T: T: 732 . 888 . 6210 F: 732 . 847 . 4335 SHEET DE5GRIPTION: T-I TITLE SHEET Z-1 RADIUS MAP 4 SURROUNDING INFORMATION Z-2 PARTIAL PLAN 4 ZONING INFORMATION SITE # : NY7315 Z-3 RTIAL SITE 4 EQUIPMENT PLAN Z-4 TOWER ELEVATION 4 DETAILS Z-5 DETAILS 414105 ROUTE 25 A ATF (AmKmAm 185 PECONIC LANE ) a "° °h CONT,AGTS: J 1 4 SITE CONTACT: TONN R LD P E C O N I C NY 119,58 qB 53015 ROUTEUTE 25 25 ■ p N SOUTHOLD, NY 11511 Lo"AVC AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. OWNER INFORMATION: PEGONIG POLICE DEPARTMENT ARC$ITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 41815 MAIN ROAD NJ-# NJ-#GE 36209 PEGONIGTOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NYIIg58 NY-#026992-028992-1 NY-#W5384 APPLICANT: METRO P05 NEW YORK, L.L.G. THI5 DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY a 5 SKYLINE DRIVE GOPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC " AND FOR THE PXCLU51VF 05E BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY HAWTHORNE, NY 10552 DUFLIOATION OR U5E WITHOUT EXPRE55 ARITTEN GON5ENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED ATTORNEY: RE, NIELSEN, HUBER 4 COUSHLIN, LLP 56 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE HUNTIN6TON, NY 11145 SECTION ■■ 75 BLOCK ■■ 5 LOT ■■ 14 . 001 Ti (651) 425-4100 FAX. (651) 425-4104 SCOFF OF WORK: ZONE : R-80 Z� - INSTALLATION OF (4) EQUIPMENT CABINETS ON NEW CONCRETE SLAB. - INSTALLATION OF (6) PANEL ANTENNAS ON Ni MOUNTS TO EXI5TIN6 TOWER. - INSTALLATION OF GABLE BRIDGE FOR ROUTING COAXIAL GABLES TO TOWER 01/02/10 RE-ISSUED P 5 PRILIMINARYS - INSTALLATION OF COAXIAL GABLES UP THE TOWER TO THE ANTENNAS. - INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE 5ERVIGE FOR EQUIPMENT A 08/18/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS - INSTALLATION OP CHAIN LINK FENCE AND ACCE55 6ATES. _ - INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPIN6 SGREENIN6 AROUND PROPOSED FENCED EQUIPMENT KEY MAP; SCALE: I"=10001 (110) TOPOGRAPHIC MAP: 5GALE: "=1000' (11x11) REVISION COMPOUND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCALE: I"=500' (22x34) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 5(ALE; I"=500' (22x34) REV. DATE DE5GRIPTION -I,'• - __ — - -"NI,3i (3tiA '�y,;�yi 1 1' a III d 1111 3 u>a 11 E 1 1 11 u 1 I 'I'_I d! p, 1 n, W .n.''' '- "= -� - - t d �I f - -. • I ] --1'j � I il�rt I �IpV,'VI I _ o �I 1� - s'fi?'F CLIENT. NOTES: GA ONS L) CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND SPEGIFI TI OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. -sem FI _ , 1 ���=. .!._�rV;'' •' I'� 1 y� I��U i p .,' ' - - - ---,_ y,< - - , - I}r• d� _ - Ill:=i 1 II Id.,o-"l,ii" - � _ fIl- I_ ,1 ,I",,- _ 15 AN UNMANNED FACILITY AND THEREFORE NO PARKING HAS ���. -- _ - ��y, i = ��_ - ' � �I,I`l„ � �- _ �'�r, d�, � II�I�P�LI] �Ih��h1,,,fi'::, �1: � °= 1��I II�I,.P , 2.) THE PROPOSED COMPOUND p1��2QXIO W _ = ��;, Ll: �'I, '�Iti �mr , +u I� IS,ilr�' �, �- metroPCS _ , ��'--'.'"�T ��_ -o- .�� - _ _ - -_ � ,� ' 1�+ h11JJ�-Li � I� ��i., .= Ilul , ]1911- — - IIII d il',, III 11!" I :��Ir � - S. - BEEN PROVIDED. r x ��- =_ ._ .- ar,,�llgt�svn - " � ° ;��, I � �I- �6 :6 I � _ I I X14 dI 11 �l-, 111 ; ; I„'` r �' o n , , New Yo L.L.C. PERMANENT EMPLOYEE - 4( I f� ._.. �, . 6�l� � 9g I;�i"b � �� �., III I I�,_, III I, 1 ,d � _��L:, + E PROPOSED MOBILE EQUIPMENT DOES NOT REQUIRE A P -s , 3J TH R = �� � -�� � � ) 1 � � � 'I " I ,..�._ . r. : °==1 I � �” �q .�. I�9 ,.,.� : � f��- � - r:_ 3 . �1 -= ,Iol - Rl. -•- : ,,I, I� P .I �1�4 11�1�- - i :,,-i, E OCCUPANCY, IT 15 AN UNMANNED FACILITY, AND THEREFORE R QUIRESNOPOTABLEWATER —a .49 — - .Ij= h =:_•p 4. .- r -t- � � �� Il = I , �II. 1�i - .:-�I d�i1I' i - 5 AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL SITE PARKING. - §�F SANITARY SEWER -_ _ - � � - VERAG EVERY FOUR TO 51X WEEK PERIOD FOR —� " 4.) THIS SITE WILL BE VISITED ON ANA E . —:. _ _ — -- v ' ; — _--.: 1 �,�1 11 , ,1 �1,1 I _ ,- I�r�fl CLIENT PROJECT �: MAINTENANCE AND SHALL BE MONITORED FROM A REMOTE FACILITY. � -� -� ���r� -�;,r `4 ��'= - _ .�, " -_ ,�� - ' �1"j ; � , 9�1 �, ;, =a f a I� II f �� - _ � Ri; � - - � -� 1 �, '�, ,� l rl III __ -, ur IjM-� 11, ll11'11. � -, I. ' 5. THIS PROPOSED SITE ONLY REQUIRES ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE UTILITIES. CONNECTIONS _� �_ � �, 1L".� �, � '_ :� � q ,I 1;, � �, 1 � lr,- ��- :1. r 8 �I 4 I i ...1 pi�� � 1NY-7515 E APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY UPON APPROVAL. _ SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE gra - 1zl �.'�I D WORK LIGHT ON MANUAL TIMER 5WITGH BY � ��, -=- + - � I �;I I � _ 3 � ��� �:" � �_ - ��� �:'16IIdd - IIII -",I�1131�- 6.) SITE LIGHTING WILL BE REQUIRED. PROPOSE y. ��� _ - �� 44h q�� ;r - � I�� � ! :- ��� I I r� �' r�lf' 11J �� "'I SITE ADDRESS: mai EQUIPMENT. _ ROUTS � � AND AGENCY PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF MUNICIPAL 7) THESE DRAWINGS AREBEINGP E UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THESE DRAWIN65 SHALL NOT B NY I I �f58 PURPOSES, UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. TOWN OF SOUTHOLi7 - ICs1N � TI.Gi� T1s OGIG- M� __ p°}� _ €I�Id V 11 °�� ,111'111 �II�II�I11111djk ,� VI lel , � 1 DRAWING TITLE. _ v lal: u I pin - � 11y I Ig '11' 1111 > up r�!rR �� I I�iN1 - _ o - 7 �� Ifulp l ' it ",d` Ipd@ : jTc- DATE s" III �� g TOWN CHAIRMAN: - -_ �� - I l� � - 4' - TOWN SECRETARY: DATE 0' 1000' 1500' 2000' DRAWN BY. SHEET NUMBER. CONSTRUCTION OFFICIAL: DATE DGa --J CHECKED BY P TOWN ENGINEER: DATEE DATE o T : 08/18/10 MTM PROJECT #i O`�MPST5008 1 ss� a� SEC I BLK I LOT I ZONEI PROPERTYOWNER ADDRESS / 74 5 15 R-80 JILL BLUM PO BOX 151 PECONIC,NY 11958 \ RES. 75 1 13 R-80 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PO BOX 1179 53095 ROUTE 25,SOUTHOLD NY 11971 \ 075 75 1 14 B LAIIBRDA LLC 53 NORTHWEST DR, NORTHPORT NY 11768 12 75 1 15.2 R-80 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PO BOX 1179 53095 ROUTE 25 SOUTHC LD,NY 11971 75 1 15.3 R-80 ML MAIN ROAD LLC 770 PARK AVE UNIT 18A,NEW YORK NY 1 02 D E S I G N z 75 2 1 15.4 R-80 ML MAIN ROAD LLC 770 PARK AVE: UNIT 18A NEW YORK NY SC01 75 5 R-80 JILL BLUM - PO BOX 151 PECONIC,NY 11958 G R O U P 75 5 . R-80 STEVEN SYGMAN & MARIA PO BOX 121 PECONIC NY 11958 / 75 5 1 3 1 R-80 ISTELLA SAKOWIC PO BOX 173 PECONIC, NY 11958 / SCHOOL 75 5 1 4 1 R-80 ALICE MALINAUSKAS PO BOX 13/585 PECONIC LANE, PECONIC,NY 11958 A R C H I T E C T U R E / '� 75 5 5 R-80 SOPHIEANDRADE PO BOX 505 PECONIC LANE, PECONIC,NY 11958 \ 075 75 5 6 R-80 MARINATSOICANOS STEVEN&ELAINE KOKICINOS PO BOX 229,PECONIC,NY 11958 ENGINEERING 500' RADIUS LINE / \` 1 75 5 7 R-80 ELAINE LATHAM PO BOX 264 PECONIC NY 11958 75 5 9 B DAVID LAFRENIERE 910 TUTHILL ROAD EXT SOUTHOLD NY 11971 iT T P. O. BOX A6R 13 75 5 10 B LIL EMILY ROSE COP. 41965 RT25 PECONIC NY 11958 HAZLET, NEWJERSEY 07730 / \ �- 074 Q \ \ 75 5 11 B EUGENE G &MARY ELLEN GRIMES 41705 RT 25 PO BOX 503 PECONIC, NY 11958 / \ ��• 15 O 110 75 5 12 8 SLAMA CHARLES REVTRUST 45 PRINCE'S PINE RD NORWALK CT06850 T: 732 . 888 . 6210 ' 75 5 13 B BERRY& BERRY LLC 41535 RT 25, PECONIC NY 11958 LOCO 5 �� , 86 1 3.1 AC PHYLLIS CATALANO 45 DOUD STREET FARMINGDALE NY 11735 1~: 732 . 847 . 4335 86 1 3.3 AC B&1 REALITY PO BOX 198, PECONIC NY 11958 86 1 3,4 AC B&J REALITY PO BOX 198 PECONIC NY 11958 AGR. 86 1 4,27 R-40 RICHMOND SHORES PROP,OWNER ASSOCIATION PO BOX 273, PECONIC, NY 11958 I 086 86 1 4.29 R-40 RICHMOND SHORES PROP.OWNER ASSOCIATION PO BOX 273 PECONIC NY 11958 ' 1 - --------------_-__-__�__-__-_____-__-.. AGR 86 1 4,4 R-40 DANIELP BEISNER&JEANEEN PO BOX 292 315 RICHMOND LANE PECONIC, NY 11958 3.3 a D 075 WILLIAM & KARRIANN SEIFERT, i 5 �IULO 86 1 4.5 R-40 GEORGE& MARGURERITE DENGEL 345 RICHMOND LANE,PECONIC NY 11958 86 1 46 R-40 ITHOMAS&CLAUDIA I ' ® off I I 86 1 6.1 R-40 GREGORY C WESTERLUND41640 RT 2350 0 PECOND NIC, 11CY11958 PECONIC,� 1.1 I ! 86 1 6.2 R-40 ADOLPH WESTERLUND&THERSA A, 41700 RT 25, PECONIC NY 11958 I REG CENTER I 86 1 7 R-40 SCOTT DESIMONE MELISSA]HYATT-DESIMONS 41780 RT25, PECONIC, NY 11958 PAIR 075 86 1 8 R-80 THOMAS D, GRATTAN JR. PO BOX 465, PECONIC NY 11958 . �5 MOGt,r T<� I \rCJO ; 075 1 86 1 9.1 R-80 PELLEGRINI PECONIC LLC 23005 RT 25, CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 RESIDENTIAL LOW 5 �J RES. 15 2 8fi 1 9.3 R-60 PELLEGRINI PECONIC LLC 23005 RT 25, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 v 0, J I I 86 1 10.9 R-80 ZIP PECONIC WELLS LLC 717 5TH AVE:FLOOR 19,NEW YORK NY 9022 DENSITY I(2 ACRES) 1 86 1 15 AC HERODOTUS DAMIANOS 591-A BICYCLE PATH, PT.JEFFERSON,NY 11776 NOTE: F N� I 075�� I I� SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER Lou Mo hno,ITEcTAIA Robert W. Toms,P.E. I 5 NFORMATION WAS UPDATED ON g ! 03 RES, JULY 12, 2010 FROM TOWN OF STRUCTURAL NJT# GE a 36209 ' 'hl I I SDUTHOLD TAX RECORDS NY-#028992-1 NY-#075384 I 075 THI5 DOCUMENT 15 THE DE510N, PROPERTY 4 AGR I AGR. 5 /7 fJ1 I J I G GOFYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC" AND 086 C/ L� /� l F J FOR THE EXGLU5IYE U5E BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY ]� DUPLICATION OR U5E WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN I 1 086 311 ' ' O4 J 075A6RI I FI\®FE RT� OI I Its E R& 15T CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED, 15 I 3.4 I WILL J_ I 3.1 075 / , . 1 IIxI156ALE: NOT TO SCALE t I AG ' 055 O;, RES a05� RE7` 15.4 I I 24x36 SCALE. ADRIGU075 Q R-50 ' CONSERVATION 14.1 N a 5 2 ACRES [� j 06 DELA NSITY (2AA RES) ] I TOWNSHIP OF I RES. 055 Q� I I ! �❑ SOUTHOLD HWY L1 07 — ❑ DEPARTMENT � R300-0 09/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS I � � _ I �B z4\ 08/13/10 1551JED AS PRILIMINARYS I ❑ V GENERAL BUSINESS ` ! ❑ BUSINESS 075 ZONE I REV DATE E5GR PTION v 1 GL ENT I ! 0735 055 14 GAR ' S DEALERSHIP 1 E7 I CARPET 12 WINDOW / I metroPCS TREATMENT / '—' — — GLEANING VACANT BUSINESS ! FIBUS E5 075 New York, L.L.C. ( BUSINESS LAND ❑ GLA55 075 1 075 TAU075 5 15.3 T I RS 09 O AGR. 1 5 CLIENT PROJECT #. NY751 S RT 25/MAIN ROAD (EXIST. SCENIC BYWAY) / SITE ADDRESS. RES. RES \ ,p0 0 086 R ED C) RES �C AEGON I GNY ISI �f 58 \ 086 4 4.29 086 �� 8 / / 1 � 1 1 � oes o,- TOWN OF SOIJTHOLD 6 1 4.4 RES. 1 RES 086 086 p-0.O C/ RES 91 / � / / AJR / DRAWING TITLE. 086 \ 6.2 1 o v 7 RESIDENTIAL LOW 086 G _ DEN5ITY (2 ACRES) \ / RADIUS MAP SURROUNDIN 4.5 (Z-40 10.9 / 4- RE RERESIDENTIAL LOW 086 1 DENSITY (I AGRE5) 5001 RADIUOJ/ VICINIT'T-/ KET' M'a'f DRAWN BY; SHEET NUMBER. IIXI7 SCALE: 111 =2001-011 086 4.6 VACANT LAND AGR. DGa 1 086 086 24x36 5GALE 111 = 100'-O" CHECKED BY: 4.7 1 1 / 0' 200' 300' 400' PMo _4.27 9.3 DATE: 0B/la�l0 MTM PROJECT #; O°1MPST5008 t�� ' i I I l ZONING INFO1RMATION R-80 ITEM REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED qZ EaU I PMENT MIN. LOT AREA 80,000 S.F. 561,442.17 S.F. NO CHANGE I FIA MIN. LOT WIDTH 175 FT 531.76 FT. NO CHANGE DESIGN z MIN. LOT DEPTH 250 FT 1020.41 FT. NO CHANGE z N z J MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (ANTENNA) 100 FT. N/A 1012.15 FT. ¢ d LOT: 15 G R O U P MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (EQUIPMENT) 100 FT. 11.0 FT. 188.83 FT. wIL ILQ MIN. 51DE YARD SETBACK ONE 20' FT. N/A 61.3 FT. o D- A R C H I T E C T U R E (ANTENNA) TOTAL 45' FT. N/A 458.11 FT. a p IL r- Q o ENGINEERING MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK ONE 20' FT. 12.25 FT. 84.63 FT. L () 11. P. O. BOX 3 (EQUIPMENT) TOTAL 45' FT. 6.58 FT. 420.41 FT. Z-3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (ANTENNA) 75' FT. N/A 20.1 FT. T: 732 . 888 . 6210 MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (EQUIPMENT) 75' FT. 10.0 FT. 50.81 FT. ( �_r — .lb .. — — — — I�Er F: 732 . 847 . 4335 MIN. LANDSCAPE AREA 25% 8b8% © 8.bq% 1—, L7a SETBACK ARD t-IAX. LOT CSE 20% MAX. UILDING H 1 HTEROR ES 55 FT. / 2 1/2 145T1 FT - g225 FT - TOP OF o - AN BNNp T O OROPOSED PROPERTY,JINBJ / LOT': EXISTING TOWER ANTENNA l ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMUNICATIONS TOWER, PER TOWNSHIP CODE ARTICLE XVII, SECTIONS 28047 - 280-81, ARE AS FOLLOWS: MAX. HEIGHT 80 FT. 145 FT. © q2'-3" MAX. EaUIPMENT AREA 500 5a. FT. N/A 180 50. FT. (pROpOs 42041 SID 6 - ��Pgo Rcy�r KEY: © EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY N/A NON APPLICABLE BD pQUIPMENT CO ND Ser �pBR +/ LOT: 2 ! TY LINE) LOT. 15.2 - NO BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS PERFORMED. V (PR 174-83' 5/POS SIDE YARD E 02899Y°Q LOT.5 2 EQUIPMpNT ACK IF NA - BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE TO J � a Lou Mo lino,AIA Robert W.Toms,P.E. AND TAKEN FROM THE FOLLOWING: - pROPE,p�-�, LI OI"I OUND . gg SECTION: Obb i�IO LOT: 3 ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER - A DRAWING TITLED SITE PLAN, PREPARED BY BLOCK. 6qg, s *I— NJ -#AI13345 NJ-#GE 36209 JOHN GALLAGHER DATED OGTOBER 30, 2003, LOT. 3I SETBACK YARD m m NY-#028992-1 NY-#075384 AGK (P IN - A DRAWING TITLED SITE PLAN, PREPARED FOR pIJTENIJp TO PROP POSED o° )� TH15 DOCUMENT 15 THE DE5IGN, PROPERTY a NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS BY WILLIAM F. ! ERTY LINEJ x_ FOR TRE EXCLU5IVE se EW THe Ti6ROCLIENT. ANY COLLINS A.I.A. ARGHITEGT5, 1212 TECHNOLOGY I DUPLICATION OR Use WITHOUT EXPRe55 WRITTEN DRIVE, 5ETAUKET, NY 11153 DATED 10/06/g5. ?7- I �q i LOT: 4 CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. - 51TE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY THE MTM u p DESIGN GROUP INC. AT SITE VISIT ON4.14.01 SECTION: 075 o bio BLOCK: 5 wH- q LOT: 14.1 ZL 011' 0knQry'mLOT. 5 (v o In = LOT: 15.4 I 0i V IL LOT: 6 01/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS in ZL u J m vw .off ' �4 � CII u- w _ �q 08/18/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS w Lu LD REVISION -- - pN 0 ' LOT: l REV. DATE DESCRIPTION EL K o p ❑ L- 256.Oq, r ` L — —••�-556'00" E' GLIENT: ry N '� ��I6TIN6 BUILDING a metroPCS 60 EXISTING BUILDING / New York, L.L.C. 344.84' 'q W —7 O CLIENT PROJECT 1i: "' LOT: 14 Wr 5 ' OI0 :3. oO" SITE ADDRESS: Lor: I3 41405 �OIJTS � 5 ry LOT: 12 LOT: I try„�O 9\q 152.84' S 48' 0g'�0—� TTOWNOI OF SOIJTHOLD LOT. q / LOT: IO DRAWING TITLE. �1— _ N II' 10' 00” E 771.00' 81.64' 548' 39' S0" W 1 T F=� I— hl MAIN ROAD ZONING INFORMATION LOT: 4.21 LOT: 6.1 LOT: 6.2 LOT. 1 LOT: 8 SECTION: 086 DRAWN BY. SHEET NUMBERED F/7' / BLOCK: 1 / LOT: 10.1 DGo LOT: q.l CHECKED BY: PMo I TE FLAN DATE: IXI7 5GALE: P = 150'-011 08/18/10 24x36 56ALE: I" = 75'-0" MO�fMPST5008 SEF � 0 2U1� KEY NOTES: OE = PROP05FO ELECTRIC ROUTED OVERHEAD FROM EXISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS)' EXISTING UTILITY POLE #251 TO NEW METRO PGS POLE IN COMPOUND X IAIFIA OG = GROUND TO PROPOSED GROUND I c D E S I G N �-' RING AROUND NEW EQUIPMENT EXISTING OT = EXISTING TELCO FROM EXISTING (BY HERS)UIPMENT COMPOUND R O U T P :4 GSG CABINET i A R C H I _TE C T U R E NOTE: EXISTING 131'-6" HIGH SELF �_ ENGINEERIN G ANY 015PLACED SOIL FOR PROP05ED SUPPORTING LATTICE TOWER P. O. BOX 3 INSTALLATION OF METRO P05 EQUIPMENT HAZLET, NEW ERSEY 07730 MUST REMAIN ON 51TE AND CAN NOT BE J REMOVED FROM PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. T: 732 . 888 . 6210 — F: 732 . 847 . 4335 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED METRO P65 PANEL PROPOSED METRO PG5 PANEL ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, b TOTAL) ON NEW W ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON NE MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOWER ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES LE65 (SEE 2/Z-4 FOR DETAILS) MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOWER LE65 (5EE 2/Z-4 FOR DETAILS) / `���Mocfl /T`sO� EXISTING 131'-6" HIGH SELF SUPPOTOWERRTING LATTICE PROPOSED METRO PG5 COAXIAL GABLES ROUTED UP TOWER ON GABLE LADDER " 15-0" GRAIN LINK FENCE Lou Mo luno,AIA Robert P.E. W. s, EXISTING EQUIPMENT ARCH ttaEER SHELTER (BY OTHERS) EXISTING ACCESS GATE NJ-#A I 13345 . NJ-#GE 36209 "tl I & I ' � b" 14'-0" CONCRETE SLAB 6 '+ NY-#028992-1 NY-#075384 THI5 DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY d PROPOSED METRA PG5 GQAXIAL,i \ _ COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM OF515N GROUP, ING " AND FOR THE EXCLU51VF USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY GABLES ROUTED ALONG NEW GABLE 1 \ DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN BRIDGE \ \�\ CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED, LY ' — — - — — — PROPOSED METRO PGS GPS UNIT ATBT i MOUNTED TO GABLE BRIDGE m ' Z-4 SUPPORT P05T (SEE DETAIL 3/Z-4) u I I _ T-MOBILE EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK \ ° FENCE W/ BARBED WIRE j PROP05ED TELCO ROUTED UNDER— TO Z_g EXISTING SURFACE FROM EXISTING 09/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS 0 1 CSO CABINET TO PROPOSEDzzzzl NEXTEL _ O� COMPOUND (VERIFY WITH TOWN 1 O6 REQUIREMENTS) z ro i / 08118/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS L __ _________ __________________________ _ _ Q __ ____ ____ _ O ' O T REV DATE REVISION DESGRI PTI ON O=_. O Z—a PROP05ED ELECTRIC ROUTED z 0 GLENT OVERHEAD FROM EXISTING = p \ VERIZON UTILITY POLE 0251 TO NEW u u METRO PGS POLE IN COMPOUND - o o a 1'11etrOPCs PROPOSED UTILITY POLE _ J INSTALLED IN NEW COMPOUND, New York, L.L.C. UP, �a EXISTING EQUIPMENT TO BE COORDINATED WITH ' — UTILITY COMPANY SHELTER (BY OTHERS) / lz ROJECT 6 CLIENT P . I EXISTING PROPANE TANK PROPOSED METRO PCS 6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH N)'7515 EXISTING GENERATOR BARBED WIRE AT TOP \ PROP05ED METRO PGS EQUIPMENT SITE ADDRESS: EXISTING C5C CABINET CABINETS (TYP. OF 4) MOUNTED ON EXISTING UTILITY POLE #251 NEW STEEL RAIL5 ANCHORED TO PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB (ISO P�GON G, NY I ��JB PROP05ED METRO PIEQUIPMENT CABINET5 (TYP. SQ. FT. LEASE AREA) _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OF 4) MOUNTED ON NEW STEEL RAIL5 ANCHORED TO PROP05ED 10'x14' CONCRETE SLAB (151 PROPOSED 4'-0" WIDE ACCESS GATE WITH BARBED WIRE AT TOP DRAWING TITLE: 50. FT. LEASE AREA) (TYP. OF 2), SAFETY 516N NOTICE TO BE PLACED ON FENCE (SEE F' RTL S T� PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SCREENING AROUND METRO DETAILS 243/Z-5) PG5 FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, 10'+/- HIGH PROPOSED METRO P05 PTC CABINET WITH L16HT ON P05T ARBORVITAE'S OR APPROVED EQUAL (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-4) EQU I i=HENT N 2 PROP05ED LAND56APIN6 SCREENING AROUND METRO P65 FENCED / A- EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, 10'+/- HI6H ARBORVITAE5 OR APPROVED DRAWN BY: SHEET NUMBER EQUAL (SEE DETAIL 5/Z-4) r>)00 CHECKED BY- FAIR - IAL SITE FLAN �.,_'� EQUIPMENT LAN 15 Ixll SCALE: "=30'-0" Ixll SCALE: 3110" = 1'-0" 08/I8/I0 24x36 SCALE. 1" = 15'-0" 24x36 SCALE: 3/0" 1'-0" MTM PROJECT #: OgMi�ST500� 0 talo I NOTE: FOUNDATION MODIFICATIONS TO TOWER MUST BE COMPLETED 4-0 PRIOR TO ADDING ANY EQUIPMENT TO THE EXISTING TOWER. OYp.J TOP Ft WHIP ANTENNAS AIF4& 145'-OABOVE GRADE GAMMA DESIGNU EXISTING SUPER STATIONMASTER ANTENNA SECTOR GROUP EXISTING NEXTEL WHIP ANTENNAS (TYPICAL OF 3) EXISTING 131'-6" HIGH SELF SUPPORTING LATTICE TOWER TOP OF EXI5TIN6 TOWER I$ CENTER OF FT A R C H I T E C T U R E EXISTING PANEL ANTENNAS (ATBT) _ _ _ _ ENGINEERING 130'-O" ± ABOVE GRADE - NOTH OF TOWER 4'-O" P. O. BOX 3 �EXISTING BEACON L16HTAT TOP HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 CENTER OF EXI5TIN6_ANTENNA_5 (T-MOBILE) _ T: 732 . 888 . 6210 S'-D"f ABOVE GRADE PROPOSED METRO PI PANEL F: 732 . 847 . 4335 ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON ANTENNA SUPPORT EXISTING POLICE WHIP ANTENNAS FRAMES MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOWER LEG (SEE DETAIL 4/Z-4) CENTER 0' OF_EXI5TIN6_ANTENNAS (VERIZON) _ 10 -O"± ABOVE GRADE 180' TOP OF PROP. METRO PI ANTENNAS BETA SECTOR 80' *2'-3"t ABOVE GRADE ALPHA �Oy GEGS ENTER OF PROP. METRO PANTENNAS SECTOR to O'_-O"f ABOVE GRADE ANTENNA ORIENTATION FLAN gg1 ` PROPOSED METRO P65 PANEL ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2� voR NOTE: )4x3b C N.T.S. PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON NEW ANTENNA SUPPORT 24x36 SGALE: N.T.S. Lou Moglin0,AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. FRAMES MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOWER LEG, EXISTING ALL EXI5TIN6 ANTENNAS ON TOWER ARcx TECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ANTENNAS TO BE REMOVED MAY NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THI5 NJ-#Al 13345 NJ-#GE 36209 VIEW AND MAY NOT BE 5HOWN FOR „ PROPOSED NY-#028992-1 NY-#075384 EXISTING 131'-6" HI6H SELF CLARITY; REFERENCE THE 3 SUPPORTING LATTICE TOWER STRUCTURAL ANALY515 REPORT / GPS UNIT THIS HT OF "THE I5 THE E516 N, PROPERTY i FOR ACTUAL TOWER LOADING, Oj 1-1/4"d sch. 40 x 18" L6. MIN 55 OR GALV. PIPE FOR THE ex EXCLUSIVE Use Br DE516N TI6ROruENT ANY PROPOSED METRO P65 COAXIAL EXI5TIN6 AND PROPOSED. �� DUPLICATION OR use WITHOUT FXFRE55 WRITTEN GABLES ROUTED UP TOWER ON � O PLATE I/4 x 4-I/4 x I6-I/4" LG. GALV,(A-36) GON5ENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. GABLE LADDER MOUNTIN6� TILT HOLES FOR PROPOSED METRO PI COAXIALPLATE BCKET e --ADJUSTMENT O STD. U-BOLT FOR 2"(P PIPE W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND WASHER, GALV. GABLES ROUTED ALONG NEW GABLE 4 O BRIDGE (SEE DETAIL 4/Z-5) PROPOSED 5TD. U-BOLT FOR 2"4 PIPE W/ DOUBLE HEX ZL 4 PROPOSED METRO PGS 6P5 UNIT MOUNTING MAST NUTS AND WASHER, GALV. (5EE NOTE 3) MOUNTED TO GABLE BRIDGE /_-�EXI5TIH6 6' WHIP ANTENNA SUPPORT POST (5EE DETAIL 3/Z-4) GROUND BAR PROPOSED METRO PI 12'-0"xI5'-O" FENCED COMPOUND WITH PROPOSED METRO PGS 61 EXISTING WHIP ANTENNA _ A\ 09/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS HI6H CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH BARBED WIRE AT 38'-0"±ABOVE 6RAPE - �� ANTFNNA DETAIL TOP (SEE DRAWING 2/Z-3 FOR DETAILS) lxll SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 08/16/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARYS NOTE: 24x36 SGALE. I'' I'-0" PROPOSED UTILITY POLE INSTALLED IN EXI5TIN6 SPIEL EQUIPMENT AREA NOT SHOWDEScRIPN FOR CLARITY. REV. DATE RECFIF' rION NEW COMPOUND, TO COORDINATED WITH UTILTY COMPANY PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA: WIDTH OF TOWER Il'-O" KATHREIN MODEL NO. 800-10504 cuENT. AT BASE Olmenslons EXISTING EQUIPMENT SWELTER (BY OTHERS) Height 4'-6 I/4" metroPCS EXISTING EQUIPMENT by4ll De Depth 2 1/ 2" EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK SHELTER (BY OTHERS) I f� FENCE W/ BARBED WIRE EXISTING TOWER FOUNDATION, New York, L.L.C. MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED, 5EE NOTES 7HI5 SHEET. GL,IENT PROJECT #. APPROX. 6RADE ` J NY7515 EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER (BY OTHERS) AS PER A STRUCTURAL ANALY515 REPORT PREPARED BY KM 51TE ADDRESS. CONSULTING EN6INEER5, INC. 32 WEST UPPER FERRY ROAD, EWIN6, NJ =d 4 405 iZOUTE � � PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SCREENING 08628,(MICHAEL L. BOHLIN6ER, PE NY LICENCE # 015100) DATED JULY AEGON G NY �t58 AROUND METRO PGS FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, 10' HIGH +/- 8, 2009, LAST UPDATED AUGUST 25, 2010 (REV 4) FROM KM REPORT E AQUIPME T CO OR APPROVED EQUAL, PREPARED FOR MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC. P.O. BOY( 3 HAZLET, NJ 01130, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (SEE DETAIL 5/Z 5) THE DESIGN FOR THE EXISTING 130'-0" NIGH LATTICE TOWER LOCATED IN PEGONIG (TOWN OF BOUTHHOLO), NEW YORK, SUFFOLK COUNTY MEETS DRAww6 TITLE: PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE 4 THE REQUIREMENTS OF TIA/EIA-222-F FOR AN 14 MPH FA5TE5T-MILE TELCO ROUTED UNDER EXISTING WIND SPEED WITH 1/2" OF RADIAL IGE WITH 25% WIND LOAD REDUCTION SURFACE TO PROP05ED COMPOUND FOR THE PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION, THE FOUNDATION 'N T PROPOSED METRO PGS EQUIPMENT CABINETS REACTIONS, WITH THE PROPOSED LOADING CONFIGURATION, WERE PL 7,1 N D E T I L S FOUND TO BE GREATER THAN THE CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING (TYP. OF 2) MOUNTED ON STEEL RAILS FOUNDATION DESIGN. THEREFORE MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANCHORED TO CONCRETE SLAB (180 50. FT. THE TOWER FOUNDATION. A SEPARATE SET OF DRAWINGS AND DETAILS FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW LEASE AREA) ARE PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. DRAWN BY: SHEET NUMBER: DGa NORTH TOWEiR rELEVATION r-� ANTENNA SPECIr- ICATIONS GPMo BY xll SGIIxIl SCALE: 1/2111-0" AE: 77 24xB6 SCALE I" = 10'-011 p cll l I 24x36 SGALE: I" = 1'-0° 0805/10 MTM PROJECT *: 0IMPSTS008 - sEP � o zmo llv�&PROPOSED 8" THICK 4000 P5I CONCRETE SLAB WITH 2 LAYERS OF bxb-8/8 WELDED WIRE FABRIC. SEE NOTE: DESIGN u PLANS FOR PAD SIZE (TOP TO BE L16HTLY BRUSHED) I. 516N SHALL BE MOUNTED ON EXTERIOR 51DE OF FACILITY DOOR. O T T D w 2. MOUNTING HE16HT TO BE 5'-0" LJ .L PROPOSED CHAMFERED EDGE = v ABOVE SILL TO CENTERLINE OF SIGN. S AFPROX. —X—A x��x ° ° ENGINEERING u w� FINISH GRADE 4 RED BACKGROUND zQ OJ � , n G —x=x=x—x I'-5 I/2" _ ((I' I)) (ll ))� -UV-RESISTANCE PLASTIC P. O. BOX 3 ti , � NOTICE Z HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 \ / •- ;_ �1n� -„�� -„ � ...� ,� ;; T: 732 . 888 . 6210 WHITE LETTERS”. GRAPHICS F: 732 . 847 . 4335 � cccccr metroPCS � RADIO FREQUENCY ANTENAS AT'9 WHITE BAGK61R6UND 4" THICK LAYER OF 3/4" DIA. /\ \�\\\' THIS SITE \� CRUSHED STONE BASE / Site # NY7315 o PLEASE EXERCISE CAUTION -BLACK LETTERS - AROUND ANTENNAS DO NOT STAND- EXISTING UNDISTURBED IN FRONT OF ANTENNAS VIR61N 501L Network Operation Center ° ° 24/7 access line-1-866-672-6727 0 8" Ep ARCy 5b MOGLIN �cA J� CONCRETE &)_ AE3 DETAIL � IC�N 1��TAlle ��� eAr-ETTNOTICE SIGN � mr y Ixll SCALE: 3/4" I'-D" 1XII SCALE: 1 1/2" = I'-0" Ixll SCALE: 3" = I'-0" q N 24x36 SCALE: 1 I/2" = I'-0" 24x36 SCALE: 3" I'-0" 24x36 SCALE. 6" = I'-m" Lou Molino,AIA. Robert W. Toms, E. ARC ITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ-#AI 13345 NJ-#GE 36209 NY-#028992-1 NY-#075384 EQUIPMENT CABINET LEGEND THIS DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY 6 O PROPOSED LITE CABINET COPYRISHT OF "THE MTM DESI6N GROUP, INC." AND FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE SY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY W 3'-0" X D 2-11 13/16" X H 5'-11 l/8° DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PROPOSED METRO PGS CONSENT OF THE CREATOR IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 6P5 UNIT MOUNTED ON PROPOSED EQUIPMENT GABINE GABLE BRIDGE (TYPICAL W 2'-II 3/5" X D 3'-1 13/16" X H 6'-3 11/I6" OF 2) (SEE DETAIL 3/Z-5) O3 PROPOSED BATTERY CABINET PROPOSED RACO/BELL FLOOD LIGHT MODEL "5815-5 (OR W 2'-4 9/16" X D 2-4 5/4" X H :.'l 3/1611 APPROVED EQUAL) WITH ONLY (1) LIGHT FIXTURE. SECOND `PROPOSED VALMONT GABLE LIGHT HOUSING ON FIXTURE MUST BE PLUGGED. FIXTURE TO ® PROP05ED BATTERY CABINET BRIDGE ASSEMBLY OR HAVE PARSHIELD GLARE VISOR INSTALLED OVER THE W 2'-4 9/16" X D 2'-4 3/4" X H 5-115/161, APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDE PAR LAMP. LAMP HOLDER WITH SHIELD SHALL BE SUPPORT POSTS @ 6-0 ON POSITIONED IN A DOWNWARD DIRECTION IN A MANNER CENTER MAXIMUM THAT WOULD CONSTITUTE A FULL CUT-OFF LUMINAIRE (NO MORE THAN 10% OF THE LUMEN OUTPUT IS AT ANGLES 09/02/10 RE-ISSUED AS PRILIMINARY5 BETWEEN 90' i 80' BELOW THE LOWEST LIGHT-EMITTING / PART OF THE LUMINAIRE). 08/16/10 ISSUED AS PRILIMINARY5 COAXIAL GABLES PROP05ED METRO P65 PI CABINET ON UN15TRUT FRAME ROUTED ALONG GABLE REVISION f BRIDGE GRATING ON MOUNTED TO GALVANIZED P05T WITH L16HT ABOVE REV. DATE DESCRIPTION f TRAPEZE HANGERS = PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINETS CLIENT: < PROPOSED 10'-O'l H16H LANDSCAPING (I LITE, I EQUIPMENT d 2 BATTERY CABINETS) SCREENING ON STEEL FRAME MOUNTED TO CONCRETE PAD 51/2"(P SCHEDULE 40 \ \ ° POST, AT 8'-0" / metro PCS � MAXIMUM ON CENTER New York, L.L.C. o SET OF (3) STAKES WI � GUY WIRES BETWEEN I/2 AND 2/3 WAY UP TREE. _ S J CLIENT PROJECT : 4" HIGH MULCH MOUND To ��_ ij- m NY7515 FORM SAUCER AROUND TREE, _✓ . SITE ADDRESS: REMOVE BURLAP FROMax TOP I/3 OF ROOT BALL. GRADE _ B°a se=��, O3 TOP OF P�GON G , NY �f 58 /\\//� CONCRETE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PAD 0'-4" EXISTING SOIL \\�\\\ - \ \ AGL (MAX.) I'-4" DIA. CONCRETE NEW PLANT GRADE FILL. \ /� r //\\//\\� DRAWING TITLE. FOOTING, USE 8"x8"xyz° BASE PLATE WITH Y2" m T L FINISH GRADE DIA, ANCHORS FOR SCARIFY 4" BELOW ROOT m- TW c- m , MOUNTING TO SLAB BALL REGOMPAGTED. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED STEEL BEAM C6 �PROPOSED 6" THICK MLAYER 5/4" 18 �/ /�\ /\ , \/ \ /\ (ET E DETAIL I/Z 5) CRUSHED STONE BASE BELOW TREE PIT N PROP05ED CONCRETE SLAB DRAWN DY: SHEET NUMBER: UNDISTURBED GROUND. DGa CHECKED DY. CTPMo4� -� �R11�� ���Al _ �R� R _ �N7INS DETAIL _ � � -� xll SCALE: 4" 1'-0" IXIl SCALE: N.T.S. Ixll SCALE. 1/4" = I'-0l' DATE Fz 24x36 SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" 24x36 SCALE: N T.S. 2436 SCALE: 1/2" = I'-m" 08/18/10 MTM PROJECT IF OaMP5T5008, o tio�� APPROVALS ��Ak DESIGN " metropCS , RF ENGINEER DATE G R O U P z ARCH ITECTU R E New YLLC GONSrRUGrION DATE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 57 D � � 7 5 TEL: 732 . 888 . 6210 � FAX : 732 . 847 . 4335 4/� Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. 0 5 � O 17 E ARCHITECT NJ — #STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I ��ff NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 NY - # 028992-1 W - # 075384 CT - # 22375 (A . < . A . 65 FEC,� ON � L /7A--,\ NE ) PA - # 061412 N 1� 5 a IE6AI L�)ESCRI F710N : Z�\ 11/20/09 ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMo T O �NN OF 5 0 U T H O L D E3LOGK: E5 ZONE: R-80 z I/13/0q UPDATED PER CLIENT COMMENT5 DGa PMo g f LOT: 144-001 SECTIION:075 , 08/31/09 155UED FOR CONSTRUCTION JEs FMC F�O�JF-�7 I VFORI\ I{ATIO} : REVISION DRAM GHKD. "- •„„4., '`- e; .:; , � ,:'" REV DATE WN DESCRIPTION BY BY 25 SITE ADDRESS: 41815 MAIN ROAD ° $ `' ►� y PEGONIG, NY 111158 SEAL STRUCTURE HEIGHT: 31.5'x/- AGL ea r'4 � LATITUDE: DATUM N 41° 25' S5 LONGITUDE: A -720 25' 50" _NAD 83 n � N R -��SJ � ° • i 711 GROUND ELEVATION: ---+/- AMSL (NAVD 88) o r % <Q & a ANTENNA (RAO GENTER): q0' CD'+ ALPHA SECTOR: 80' THI5 DOGUME T 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY 4 " y is COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DE515N &ROUP, INC." AND FOR THE EXCLUSIVE U5E BY THE TITLE CLIENT ANY DUPLICATION OR U5E WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN BETA SECTOR: IgG' GON5ENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRIGTLY PROHIBITED. R APPROXIMATE rix SITE LOCATION 110'-0"t GAMMA SECTOR: 320' metroPCS x A New York, L.L.C. 25 PROPERTY OWNER: PEGONIG POLICE DEPARTMENT ^ k„ 41815 MAIN ROAD 5 ' t s, PEGONIG, NY Ig58 SITE N1'73Tj a LOCA7ION �Af= : SITE INFORMATION 008 SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS PROPERTY CONTACT: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53085 ROUTE 25 `TTLE CONTROLLED INSPECTIONS: SOUTHOLD, NY 111171 4140 fiZOUT� � � PE=GON I G , NY X58 T-I TITLE SHEET THESE DOCUMENTS ARE IN GOMPLIANCE 4 ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CODES 4 TOWN OF= SOUTHOLD 6N-1 GENERAL NOTES STANDARDS AS APPLICABLE: UTILITY CONTACT: LIPA $ VERIZON A-1 SITE PLAN A-2 EQUIPMENT PLAN $ ELEVATION - 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE DESIGN TYPE: - 2003 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE A-3 ANTENNA PLAN $ GABLE ROUTING DETAILS - 2003 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE GOLOGATON A-4 UTILITY FRAME ELEVATIONS $ GPS MOUNTING DETAIL - 2003 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE APPLICANT: METRO PGS NEW YORK, L.L.G. - 2003 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE 5 SKYLINE DRIVE A-5 FOUNDATION DETAILS $ EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS - 2003 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE HAINTHORNE, NY 10532 DRAWN BY: GHEGKED BY: DATE: A-6 FENCE $ GATE DETAILS - 2003 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE - 2003 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE RMe SSt 05/08/09 A-7 ANTENNA MOUNT $ GABLE LADDER DETAILS - 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE A-g 500' RADUIS PROPERTY MAP $ OWNERS LIST -TIA-222-F STANDARDS "STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR STEEL ANTENNA TOWERS AND SUPPORTING STRUCTURES" MINIMUM RF ENGINEER: FARID ARDAKANI (1114) 552-8312 SHEET TITLE E5-1 EOUIPMENr SPECIFICATIONS BASIC WIND SPEED OF 05 MILES/ HOURS (50 MILES /HOUR IN CONJUNGTION WITH 0,15 INCHES OF RADIAL ICE). RF-I RF INFORMATION -T E-I ELEGTRIGAL NOTES $ INFORMATION MANAGER: FRANK 5ANFILIPPO (516) 455-0421 MANAGER: E-2 ELECTRICAL PLAN SAG SUPERVISOR: DOUG HALL (516) 312-1462 SHEET NUMBER REV. E-3 GROUNDING DETAILS o BEFORE YOU DIG E-4 GROUNDING DETAILS CALL TOLL FREE — IN NYC/LI I.800-212-4480 NY M THREE WOWING pAYB BEFORE YOU DIG1, i ^ y - I. ALL CONSTRUCTION, LABOR AND MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE BUILDING CODES, ORDINANCES AND TO 21. CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS AT ALL ENTRY POINTS TO EQUIPMENT AREAS. THESE ARE TO INCLUDE, BUT THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF ALL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. NOT LIMITED TO, INTERIOR FACES OF ROOF ACCESS DOORS / HATCHES. AND EXTERIOR FACES AT COMPOUND ACCESS GATES A 2. THE CONTRACTOR MUST VISIT THE SITE AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL DIMENSIONS ANP CONDITIONS. ANY AND EQUIPMENT ROOM DOORS. SIGNS ARE TO BE AS SPECIFIED AND SUPPLIED BY METRO PCS. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE A/E BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK, PURCHASE, FABRICATION AND ERECTION D E S I G Nu OF ANY MATERIAL. U 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS, APPROVALS, INSPECTIONS AND TESTS REQUIRED BY ALL GR O U P AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. A R C H I T E C T U R E 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL ITEMS OF LABOR AND MATERIALS, WHETHER OR NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED, IF FOUNDATIONS ENGINEERING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION. I. SOIL HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING CAPACITY OF 2,500 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. ESTIMATED BOTTOM OF FOOTING P. O. BOX 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE BRACING AND PROTECTING OF ALL WORK DURING CONSTRUCTION TO ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN ON FOUNDATION PLAN. THESE ELEVATIONS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO THE ACTUAL LEVELS OF HAZLET, NEWJERSEY07730 AVOID DAMAGE, COLLAPSE, DISTORTION, MISALIGNMENT, VOIDING ROOFING GUARANTEES AND WARRANTIES, ETC. PROTECTION SHALL APPROVED BEARING STRATA FOUND UPON EXCAVATION, ANY UNUSUAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE GALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. TEL: 73 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 210 BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS AND BEST PRACTICES. ROOF SURFACIES SHALL BE RESTORED TO COMFLETE NATERTIGHTNESS T THE APPROVED T C D AS - PPROVED BY THE OWNER IN WRITING. 2. NO BACK FILLING OF FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE DONE UNTIL SLAB ON GROUND IS IN PLACE AND CONCRETE HAS FAX : 732 . 847 . 4335 6. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. SET' Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 3. BOTTOM OF FOOTINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4'-0" BELOW FINISHED GRADE FOR FROST PROTECTION. NO NJ - # AI 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 7. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. FOOTINGS SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND OR WATER. ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM FROST, AS NY - # 075384 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTING THE WORK SHOWN ON REQUIRED. NY - # 028992-1 CT - # 22375 THESE PLANS. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE DONE IN A600 WORKMANSHIP MANNER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. PA - # 061412 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY EFFORTS TO PROTECT THE NEW EQUIPMENT DURING THIS INSTALLATION AND 4. MAXIMUM SLOPE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF ADJACENT FOOTINGS SHALL BE ONE (I) VERTICAL TO (2) HORIZONTAL. ALL APPLICATION SUCH AS: FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY BRACED TO WITHSTAND BACK FILLING, EARTH PRESSURE, AND CONSTRUCTION LOADS UNTIL ALL EQUIPMENT ARE INSTALLED PER THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. -THE TENANT'S EGRESS TO AND FROM THE BUILDING AND/OR THE SITE. CONCRETE -THE BUILDING'S FIRE SAFETY OR SHALL NOT CREATE ANY FIRE HAZARDS. I. CONCRETE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICAN -THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND SAFETY OF THE BUILDING. CONCRETE INSTITUTE (AGI) BUILDING CODE FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE, LATEST AMENDMENTS. -THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY CREATION OF NOISE OUTSIDE THE NORMAL HOURS OF 7 AM TO 6 PM, UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED UPON 4Z�� 11/20/01 ISSUED POR FILING DGa PMo WITH THE OWNER. H O THE MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TTHE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS (LATEST EDITIONS): -THE BUILD 'S INGSECURITY SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ORDER TO PREVENT ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS FROM ENTERING THE 2. � DGa 11/13/01 UPDAiEDPERGLIENiLOMMENiS PMo PREMISES. PORTLAND GEMENT ASTM GI50 -THE BUILDING'S UTILITY'S (ELECTRICITY, GAS, WATER AND OTHER UTILITY'S) SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED DURING THIS APPLICATIONS READY MIX CONCRETE ASTM Cq4 S AGI-301 INSTALLATION. CONCRETE AGGREGATE ASTM C53 Ao 08/31/01 155UED FOR GONSTRUGTION JE5 PMo -ALL MASONRY PENETRATIONS SHALL BE DONE USING ROTARY ACTION ONLY (NO HAMMERING ACTION). DEFORMED BILLET STEEL BAR ASTM A615 -ALL PENETRATIONS SHALL BE FIRE-STOPPED WITH 3M F5 Iq5 WRAP STRIP FIRE-STOP AND CP25 NON-SHRINK PUTTY FIRE BARRIER WELDED WIRE FABRIC ASTM A185 REV. DATE REVISION PRAWN GHKD. SEALANT. MAINTAIN THE FIRE RATING OF ALL PENETRATED SURFACES. 3. PORTLAND GEMENT SHALL BE TYPE IA. DESCRIPTION BY BY 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, AT ALL TIMES, KEEP THE PREMISES FREE FROM ACCUMULATION OF WASTE, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALSEAL AND RUBBISH. UPON COMPLETION, ALL DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE PREMISES LEFT IN A "BROOM GLEAN" CONDITION. ALL 4. GEMENT SHALL DEVELOP A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (F'G) OF 3000 PSI AFTER a8 DAYS AND HAVE A MINIMUM SLUMP OF 3 INCHES, AND A MAXIMUM of 5 INCHES. RUBBISH SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 5. PROPORTIONING OF THE CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE BY THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY METHOD. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION (EX. NOISY OPERATIONS, \ C O 1�/ NTERRUPTIONS OF ANY MECHANICAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL SERVICES, MATERIAL DELIVERIES AND/OR STORAGE) WITH THE BUILDING 6. VIBRATORS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM FREQUENCY OF 9000 RPM. 6o A OWNER OR MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE WORK. 7. MINIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE SHALL BE 3/4" INCH. J, II. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING CONDITIONS WHERE DISTURBED BY NEW WORK OR AS REQUIRED BY THE ,�, ,,, PLANS. ALL EXISTING AREAS OF THE BUILDING DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AT 8. CONCRETE SHALL BE STONE CONCRETE HAVING AN ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS WITH A MINIMUM NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. GEMENT CONTENT OF 5.75 BAGS PER GUBIG YARD. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED, SLUMP TH15 DOCUMENT THE PrVON, PROPERTY a FOR ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM AND 5" MAXIMUM COPYR19HT OF ^TH MTM DESieN eROUP, ING." AND 12. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN AND CONFORM TO ALL BUILDING CODE AND LOCAL FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE uuENT. ANr DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN UTILITYS REQUIREMENTS. q CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.G.I. CODE. CONSENT OF THE CREATOR IE STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 13. THE GENERAL NOTES CONTAINED HEREIN ARE PART OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ARE TO BE GOMPLIED WITH IN ALL 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE TO ACCOMMODATE RESPECTS. THE MOST RESTRICTIVE NOTES SPECIFIED ARE TO TAKE PRECEDENCE. ANY AND ALL PENETRATIONS FOR ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL S ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 14. ALL PROPOSED STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE FABRICATED AND ERECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISG CODE AND ASTM 11. ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE DEFORMED BARS OF NEW BILLET STEEL CONFORMING TO ASTM SPEC A615, GRADE metroPCS O SPEGIFIGATIONS, LATEST EDITION. 60, GOLD DRAWN WIRE FOR WELDED WIRE MESH SHALL CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF "SPECS FOR GOLD DRAWN WIRE -WIDE FLANGE SECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-9q2 OR CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT" (ASTM A82-70), OR "SPEC FOR WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC FOR CONCRETE Now York, L.L.C. -MISC. STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM AN7-36 REINFORCEMENT, (ASTM A185-70). REINFORCING SHALL BE SECURELY TIED TO PREVFNT DISLOCATION AND PER THE AGI -ALL STEEL PIPES SHALL CONFORM TO TO ASTM ANT-501 OR ANT-53, GRADE B. DETAILING MANUAL. -CONNECTIONS SHALL MADE USING SPECIFIED WELDS AND WELDING. ELECTRODES E-7OXX OR SPECIF-IED HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SHALL BE ASTM A325. THREADS ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE SHEAR PLANE. 12. ALL BARS MARKED CONTINUOUS (CONT.) SHALL BE LAPPED 40 X BAR DIAMETER', AT SPLICES AND CORNERS AND SITE JOB": NY73I5 HOOKED AT NON-CONTINUOUS ENDS. LAP TOP BARS AT CENTER BETWEEN SUPPORTS AND LAP CONTINUOUS BOTTOM MTM JOB#: 011MPST5008 I5. -ALL SHOP AND FIELD WELDING SHALL BE DONE BY WELDERS QUALIFIED AS DESCRIBED IN THE "AIMERIGAN WELDING SOCIETY'S BARS AT SUPPORTS. STANDARD QUALIFICATION PROCEDURE" TO PERFORM THE PROPOSED WORK. SITE INFORMATION -BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION (ONLY EXPOSED TO MOISTURE APPLICATIONS) PEER ASTM A-123. ALL DAMAGES 13. ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY GLEANED, WERRED AND SLUSHED WITH GEMENT GROUT JUST SURFACES, WELDED AREAS AND AUTHORIZED NON-GALVANIZED MEMBERS OR PARTS (NEW OR OLD) SHALL BE PAINTED WITH TWO (2) BEFORE PLACING NEW CONCRETE. THE CONCRETE AND MASONRY CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL (OR GIVE OTHER 4 4O� ROUTE= � �J GOATS OF ZRG GOLD GALVANIZING COMPOUND MANUFACTURED BY ARG CHEMICAL PRODUCTS. TRADES AMPLE OPPORTUNITY TO INSTALL) ALL ANCHOR BOLTS, PLATES, SLOTS, CHASES, NAILERS, INSERTS, SLEEVES, -ALL PIPE SIZES INDICATED HEREIN ARE NOMINAL DIAMETER (INSIDE DIAMETER). ETC. AS REQUIRED BY OTHER TRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS BEFORE SETTING SCREEDS PE C ONIG , N--r- I I ct5a 6. ALL NEW ANTENNA APPLIGATIONS MOUNTED TO EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE SEALED AT THE TDP AND 50E5 WITH DOW CORNING AND FORMS. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CLEAR SILICONE SEALANT OR APPROVED EQUAL, THE SILICONE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE TOOLED Ta MAINTAIN A FINISHED 14. PROVIDE MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORGING BARS AS FOLLOWS: EXPOSED TO GRADE FOOTINGS (311) APPEARANCE. INTERIOR FACES OF WALLS (I"), EXTERIOR FACES OF WALLS (1-1/2"), SLAB TOP AND BOTTOM BARS (3/4"), BEAMS (1-1/2"), DESIGN TYPE: 17. WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL NEW ANTENNAS, SHROUD AND RELATED MOUNTING SLAB ON GROUND BOTTOM (3"), COLUMNS, AND PADS AND (29 TO VERTICAL BARS. HARDWARE TO MATCH THE EXISTING ADJACENT SURFACES. ALL PAINT SHALL BE SHERWIN WILLIAM5 OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE I5. WHEREVER CONCRETE SURFACES ABUT OR ARE VENEERED WITH MASONRY, PROVIDE VERTICAL DOVETAIL INSERTS GOLOGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE A METAL BASED PAINT ON THE ANTENNAS. ANTENNAS SHALL HAVE ONE: PRIMER GOAT OF POLANE FOR MASONRY ANCHORS SPACED AT 2'-O" O.G. MAXIMUM. 2.8 PLUS FIL D61H75 PRIMER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND THEN APPLY ONE TOP GOAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. ALL SURFACES CONTAMINATION SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO PAINTING THE 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A NON-SLIP BROOM FINISH IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TROWEL FINISHING PHASE. DRAWN BY: GHECKBD BY: DATE: NEW SURFACES. ALL GALVANIZED SURFACES SHALL HAVE ONE GOAT OF FERMABOND BONDING AGENT, WHILE STILL WET APPLY ONE GOAT OF SHERWIN WILLIAMS FLAT LATEX PAINT, LET DRY THEN A SECOND GOAT OF FLAT LATEX FAINT. 17, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE CONCRETE FROM RMe SSt 05/05/09 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT A CONTINUOUS 4" WIDE SAFETY LINE, TRAFFIC YELLOW OR APPROVED EQUAL ON THE WALKING PREMATURE CURING AS SOON AS THE FORMS ARE REMOVED, ESPECIALLY DURING THE FIRST 24 HOURS. SHEET TITLE SURFACES ADJACENT TO THE NEW CABINET TO DENOTE THE CLEARANCE LIMITS OF THE CABINET OR SHELTER. FILL 1. ALL FILL UNDER CONCRETE SLABS TO BE 955yo COMPACTED EARTH, WELL TAMPED AND 4" COMPACTED CRUSHED �� NE R �L COTE 9. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED LEVEL AND PLUMB. GRAVEL. ALL BACK FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ANY ORGANIC MATTER. 20, MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS NOT FABRICATED CORRECTLY, DAMAGED OR NON-CONFORMING SHALL SE REPORTED TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, A/E AND OWNER PRIOR TO ANY CORRECTIVE ACTION. ALL ACTIONS REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. SHEET NUMBER REV. I GENERAL NOTES 2 GONGRETE SP`EGIFICATIONS (IF REQUIRED) Qtu A Al - NO BOUNDARY SURVEY WA5 PERFORMED. KEY NOTES: E = P - BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE ROP05ED ELECTRIC ROUTED OVERHEAD FROM k zO EXI5TIN6 UTILITY POLE #251 TO NEW METRO PG5 Uj AND TAKEN FROM THE FOLLOWING: v w POLE IN COMPOUND D E S I G N ffpo Q � A DRAWING TITLED SITE PLAN, PREPARED 51O6 = GROUND TO PROPOSED GROUND GROUP ~ JOHN 6ALLAGHER DATED OCTOBER 30, 2003. n CL p RING AROUND NEW EQUIPMENT n � ARCHITECTURE - A DRAWING TITLED SITE PLAN, PREPARED FOR TO = EXISTING TELCO FROM EXISTING ENGINEERING NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS BY WILLIAM F. z <q LOT: 15 650 CABINET COLLINS A.I.A. ARCHITECTS, 1212 TECHNOLOGY z P. O. BOX 3 DRIVE, SETAUKET, NY 11133 DATED I0/06/15. ¢n w p HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 ow TEL: 732 . 888 . 6210 - SITE MEA5UREMENT5 TAKEN BY THE MTM 2 � + No xy� z NOTE: DESIGN GROUP INC. AT SITE V15IT ON 4.I4.0q — N ANY DISPLACED SOIL FOR PROPOSED FAX : 7 3 2 . 8 4 7 . 4 3 3 5 A-1 a x INSTALLATION OF METRO 1`65 EQUIPMENT 4 MUST REMAIN ON SITE AND CAN NOT BE Lou Moghno, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. REMOVED FROM PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - # Al13345 INY # 075384 GE 9 — — — — — — — — — NY - # l 133451 N 46' 42' 20" E 455.75: SID % CT - # 22375 (EXI51'ING TpWSR To p�psETBgGK I PA - # 061412 o P7-BAEXISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) LOT: I II I LINE) _ — ! PROPOSED METRO PG5 PAINEL ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER I2/I1/0q RE-I55UED FOR FILING BHo PMo SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON NEW ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES (- MOUNTED To EXISTING TOWER � II/20/01 I55UED FOR FILING DGa PMo (PRC>F $ LE65 (SEE A-7 FOR DETAILS) 420,41 SID YA QSEDEQUIPMENT p11F� SE7BAGK %LOT: 2 II/I3/OgUPDATED PER 6LIENTIAMOT5 DGa PMo UNp TO PROPEIR7Y LINE LOT: 15.2 EXISTING 131'-6" H16H SELF 5UPPORTIN6 LATTICE A 08/31/01 I55UED FOR OON5TRU6TIONSzT3JEs PMo SIDE Y TOWER L07:3.2 I AN1ENNq T p(PR R�D I / � � REV. DATE REVISION DRAWN GHKD. ROp � DESCRIPTION BY BY SECTION: 086 ! SETSA k(EXE YARD TY LINE) �IO LOT: 3 EXISTING EQUIPMENT SEAL BLOCK: I TO PROP TING TQWER SHELTER (BY OTHERS) LOT: 5.1 I ERTY LINE) �` olmry ' O, 'tD RSD A1C H�> td0 0 SOA ' LOT: 4 w I 01 z: z b, Q J v- < SECTION: 015 I x / , — — _ — — 2 HES ( ¢ �� Co -- , - �l BLOCK: 5 \ ' THI5 DOGU T IS DE516N, PROPERTY a LOT: 14.1 A-2 COPYRIGHT OF HE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND / LOT: S FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT ANY I DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN ?` LlCONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 571IOTLY PROHIBITED LOT: 15.4 Iv I I o oo , ! EXISTING ACCESS iL H- J ; LOT: 6 LL TO FACILITY FROM O A-2 m mfL- MAIN ROAD _ metroPCS . N I _ o o w w r ��I U New York, L.L.C. Ll--1 -------------- ------ CC ❑ �- 55'56, _ LOT: N 1 --------- ------------ --__ _- 56.09q, V l` _ _ _ _ _ J� SITE JOB#: NY-75 5 , _ , 5 _ MTM JOB#: 01:iMPSTS008 EXI5TIN6 BUILDIN6 14F SITE INFORMATION I a EXI5TW6 BUILDING u 4140 R�UT� � � --I � r- -- 6 �o P�GON G NY I I G �8 ll , EXISTING EQUIPMENT 344.84'- � __I o � J TOWN OF SOUTiHOLD SHELTER (BY OTHERS) �w h LOT: 14 EXI5TIN6 OIL TANK DESIGN TYPE: O'O ELXISTING GENERATOR oI 3v. 00„ Cl I in,N b,C ,�- -- EXISTING EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) NOTE: FOUNDATION MODIFICATIONS TO TOWER MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ADDING ANY EQUIPMENT TO THE EXISTING TOWER. DESIGNU GROUPz TOP OF EXI5TIN6 WHIP ANTENNAS (BY OTHERS) EXI5TING EQUIPMENT COMPOUND - - - - - - A R C H I T E C T U R E (BY OTHERS) XISTI t ABONG WHIPENGINEERING EXISTING 131' 6" HIGH ANTENNAS BY OTHERS P. O. BOX 3 SELF SUPPORTING WIDTH OF TOWER 4'-0" HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 LATTICE TOWER TOP OF EXISTING TOWER 4 CENTER OF AT TOP TEL: 7 3 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 2 10 EXISTING PANEL ANTENNAS (AT$T) FAX : 7 3 2 . 8 4 7 . 4 3 3 5 130'-0" ± ABOVE GRADE Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 CENTER OF_EXI5TING_ANTENNAS (T-MOBILE) NY - # 0289921 NY - # 075384 S'-O"t ABOVE GRADE CT - # 22375 PROF105ED METRO P05 PANEL PA - # 061412 ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 PER SECTOR, b TOTAL) ON NEW EXISTING POLICE ANTENNAS ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES MOUNTED TO EXI5TIN6 TOWER LE65 (SEE A-1 FOR DETAILS) CENTER OF_EXISTING_ANTENNAS (VERIZON) _ 5 2/11/01 RE ISSUED FOR FILING E3Ho PMo 100'-O"f ABOVE GRADE II/20/01 ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMo -�-92--5 1 ABOVEM6RADE ETRO 05 ANTENNAS 11/13/01 UPDA ED PER WENT COMMENTS DGa PMo ilk CENTER OF PROP. METRO PGS ANTENNAS _ 08/51/01 155UED FOR GON5TRU6TION JEs PMo 2 q0'-V± A80VE GRADE 6-0" CHAIN LINK FENCE A_2 REV1510N DRAWN CHKD. I REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY BY PROPOSED METRO P05 COAXIAL GABLES ROUTED UP TOWER ON PROP05ED METRO PG5 PANEL ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2 1 SEAL GABLE LADDER (SEE DETAIL 4/A-1) b" 14'-O" CONCRETE SLAB 6" PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON NEW ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES MOUNTED TO EX1571Nry TOWER LE6, EXISTING AI AFl EXISTING AGGE55 GATE \ ANTENNAS TO BE REMOVED` EXISTING 1311-6" HIGH SELF i ���y�Js G4 Foy SUPPORTING LATTICE TOWER z PROP05ED METRO PG5 COAXIALq PROPOSED METRO PG5 COAXIAL j GABLE5 ROUTED ALONG NEW GABLE ° GABLES ROUTED UP TOWER ON Q BRI06E (SEE DETAIL 2/A-3) `� GABLE LADDER (SEE DETAIL 4/A-1) r 2 hyo PROPOSED OF N,METRO PG5 COAXIAL THIS DOCu SIGPROPERTr 4 I COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." ANO GABLES ROUTED ALONG NEW GABLE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PROPOSED METRO PGS GPS UNIT BRIDGE (SEE DETAIL 2/A-3) CONSENT OP THE CREATOR IE STRICTLY PROHIBITED. MOUNTED TO GABLE BRIDGE 5UPPORT P05T (5EE DETAIL 3/A-4) PROPOSED METRO PGS 6P5 UNIT --- ------ Q w MOUNTED TO GABLE BRID6E EXI5TIN6 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK — ------------ - z SUPPORT POST (SEE DETAIL 3/A-4) FENCE W/ BARBED NIR w w �������� PROPOSED METRO PG5 12'-0"x15'-0" FENCED _ I PROP05ED TELCO ROUTED UNDER ' L z COMPOUND WITH PROP05ED METRO P05 61-0" NOTE: y:e- - _ EXI5TIN6 5URFAGE FROM EXISTINGL-"' V- J New York, L.L.C. -- ------ ___-.._.__._ z HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH BARBED WIRE AT I'-2" � �� ��/� p_2�� o z I EXISTING SPRINT/NEXTEL EQUIPMENT C5G CABINET TO PROP05ED v ¢ TOP (SEE DRAWING A-6 FOR DETAILS) AREA NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. COMPOUND (VERIFY WITH TOWN o v REQUIREMENTS) o o PROPOSED UTILITY POLE INSTALLED IN 51TE JoB#: WT 7515 n NEW COMPOUND, TO COORDINATED WITH MTMOB J #: PROPOSED ELEGTRIG ROUTED UTILTY COMPANY i OgMFSTS008 OVERHEAD FROM EXISTING UTILITY POLE #25q TO NEW A '" WIDTH OF TOWER I1'-0" SITE INFORMATION METRO 1`65 POLE IN COMPOUND EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER (BY OTHERS) AT BASE PROPOSED UTILITY POLE — EXISTING EQUIPMENT 4140 iPOIJTE -715IN5TALLED IN NEW COMPOUND, SHELTER (BY OTHERS) TO BE COORDINATED WITH EXISTING 6 HIGH CHAIN LINK PE=GON I G, NY I CF 5,5 UTILITY COMPANY FENCE W/ BARBED WIRE EXI5TIN6 TOWER FOUNDATION, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED, PROPOSED METRO P05 6-0" SEE NOTES THI5 SHEET. HIGH GRAIN LINK FENCE WITH DESIGN TYFE: BARBED WIRE AT TOP (SEE ` APPROX. GRADE Li DRAWING A-6 FOR DETAILS) X — -`- GOLOGATION PROP05ED METRO P05 EQUIPMENT AS PER A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARED A KM CABINETS (TYP. OF 2) MOUNTED ON EXISTING EQUIPMENT CONSULTING ENGINEERS„ INC. 32 WEST UPPER FERRY ROAD, EWIN6, NJ DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: NEW STEEL RAILS ANCHORED TO SHELTER (BY OTHERS) 08628,(MICHAEL L. BOHILINGER, PE NY LICENCE # 015100) DATED JULY PROP05ED CONCRETE SLAB (180 8, 20011, UPDATED DECEMBER 14, 200q PREPARED FOR MTM DESIGN RMe SSt 05/08/01 50. FT. LEASE AREA) (SEE PROP05ED ELECTRIC SERVICE 4 GROUP, INC. P.O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NJ 0'1130, THE DESIGN FOR THE DRAWINGS A-5 4 ES-1) TELCO ROUTED UNDER EXISTING EXISTING 130'-0" HIGH LATTICE TOWER LOCATED IN PEGONIG (TOWN OF SHEET TITLE PROPOSED 4'-O" WIDE ACCESS, GATE 5URFAGE TO PROPOSED COMPOUND 5OUTHHOLD), NEW YORK„ SUFFOLK COUNTY MEET5 THE REQUIREMENTS OF WITH BARBED WIRE AT TOP (TYP. OF PROPOSED METRO PGS EQUIPMENT CABINETS TIA/EIA-222-F FOR AN 180 MPH FA57EBT-MILE WIND SPEED WITH 1/2" OF E QL �NfE=N7 �L?NN RADIAL ICE WITH 25% WIND LOAD REDUCTION FOR THE PROPOSED 2)(5EE DRAWING A-6 FOR DETAILS) 2 (TYP. OF 2) MOUNTED ON STEEL RAILS ANTENNA GONFI6URATION. THE FOUNDATION REACTIONS, WITH THE ,a.N D E=L E=\/,4 T 1 O N ANCHORED TO CONCRETE SLAB (180 50. FT. PROP05ED LOADING GONFI6URATION, WERE FOUND TO BE GREATER PROP05ED METRO PG5 PTC LEASE AREA)(5EE DRAWINGS A-5 4 E5-1) THAN THE CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING FOUNDATION DESIGN. THEREFORE SHEET NUMBER REV. CABINET WITH LI6HT ON MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE TOWER FOUNDATION. A P05T (SEE DETAIL I/A-4) SEPARATE SET OF DRAkWIN65 AND DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. I EIOUIFMENT FLAN 2 NORTH TOWER ELEVATION 2 IIxl7 SGALE:3/I6"= 1'-O" 24x36 SCALE: 1/2"= 1 '-O" IIx17 5GALE:1 "=40'-0" 24x36 SCALE: 14 - II I1 I 11 IL FPOP05ED METRO PG5 GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO GABLE BRIDGE - - —1 SUPPORT P05T (SEE DETAIL 3/A-4) D E S I G Nu CROUP A2 5 PROPOSED VALMONT GABLE A R C H I T E C T U R E o BRIDGE ASSEMBLY OR APPROVED ENGINEERING I e I EQUAL PROVIDE SUPPORT POSTS @ 8'-0" ON CENTER MAXIMUM P. O. BOX 3 I I 320' COAXIAL GABLES ROUTED ALONG GABLE HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 GAMMA BRIDGE GRATING ON TRAPEZE HANGERS TEL: 732 . 888 . 6210 EXISTING 131'-6" HIGH 5ELF SECTOR l (SEE DETAIL 2/A-3) FAX : 7 3 2 . 8 4 7 . 4 3 3 5 SUPPORTING LATTICE TOWER — 3 1/2" NOMINAL DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. POST, AT 8-O" MAXIMUM ON CENTER ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER a NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 PROPOSED VALMONT GABLE O ® NY - # 028992-1 NY - # 075384 BRIDGE ASSEMBLY OR CT - # 22375 u- COAXIAL GABLES ROUTED UP GABLE APPROVED EQUAL. SEE PA - # 061412 >f BRIDGE P05T ON VALMONT DOUBLE MANUFACTURERS T-LINE BRACKETS OR APPROVED 5PECIFICA7ION5 FOR x o x EQUAL (SEE DETAILS 6&1/A-3) INSTALLATION GUIDELINES o m 150• BETA PROPOSED VALMONT SECTOR HANGER ASSEMBLY OR 2 20/01 ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMo APPROVED EQUAL @ 3'-0" ON CENTER 11/13/01 UPDATEDPER WENT 60MMENT5 DGa PMo 05/51/01 155UED FOR GON5TRIUGTION JE5 PMo PROPOSED 3 1/2" NOMINAL d F' ' DIAMETER 56HEDULE 40 PIPE (TYPICAL) REV. DATE REVISION DRAWN GHKD. EXISTING SOIL 22° DESCRIPTION BY BY 1'-4" CONCRETE FOOTING (SEE DETAILS PROPOSED COAXIAL GABLES (TYPICAL) SEAL 4ff5/A-3 FOR MOUNTING TO SLAB) (TYPICAL) SECURED TO �c HANGER WITH STANDARD PROPOSED 6" THICK LAYER 3/4` 01A. SNAP-IN CLIPS o c� PROPOSED METRO PIGS PANELCRUSHED STONE BASE ANTENNAS (TYP OF 2 PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) ON ANTENNA SUPPORT FRAMES i0` MOUNTED TO EXISTING TOWER LEG (SEE ALPHA DETAILS I-3/A-7) SECTOR THI5 DOCUMENT I HE DESIGN, PROPERTY 6 COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND FOR THE EXGLUSIVE U5E BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN GON5ENT OF THE CREATOR 15 5TRIGTLY PROHIBITED ANTENNA MOUNTING FLAN 2 GABLE BRIDGE ELEVATION 3 GABLE MOUNT DETAIL © GABLE BRIDGE IIxI7 SGALE:3/I6" = I'-0" 24x36 SCALE: 5/8" = 1 '-O" IIxl7 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 24x36 5GALE: 1/2" = 1 '-O" IIxl7 5GALE: 3/4"= 1 '-0" 24x36 SCALE: 1 1/2"= 1 '-0" metroPCS New York, L.L.C. PROP05ED COAXIAL GABLES (TYPICAL) SECURED TO N)'73 15 DOUBLE T-LINE BRAGKET WITH 51TE Joe": g GABLE BRIDGE "I (99 STANDARD SNAP-IN CLIPS MTM JOB#: O�iMPSTSOOa A-B /2"� ANCHOR SET 41/4" INTO HILTI-HIT SUPPORT POST PROP05ED VALMONT 7-LINE SITE INFORMATIONHY-150 SYSTEM (SEE MANUFACTURERS (SEE DETAIL /A-3) BRACKET MODEL 802113 OR SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION APPROVED EQUAL 5PAGED g PROCEDURE) (TYPICAL OF 4 PER PLATE) 5-0" ON CENTER (AS :25 1/2"4 WEEP HOLE -Iry REQUIRED) PE=GON I G, NY I 1 58 8"x8"xl/2" BASE PLATE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB TOWN OF 5OUTHOLD - 8"x8'xI/2!l' BASE PLATE 6 BRACKET PLAN DESIGN TYPE: IIxl7 SGALE:N.T.S. 24x36 SCALE: N.T.S. a I I I I PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB PROPOSED 51/2" NOMINAL DIAMETER _ )o J�oUOU� Q u u (SEE DETAIL 3/A-5) SCHEDULIE 40 GABLE BRIDGE SUPPORT GOLOGAT ON POST WEILDED ONTO 8"x8"xI/2" BASE PLATE -IN a' PROVIDE NON-SHRINK GROUT @ _ ^" ? 06 ° ° INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE SLAB DRAwN BY: CHECKED 5-r. DATE: '>oc a AND BASE PLATE /2" D ANCHOR SET 4 I/4" INTO HILTI-HIT HY-150 PROPOSED COAXIAL GABLES SYSTEM pSEE MANUFACTURER'S SPEGIFIGATION5 51, (TYPICAL) SECURED TO RMe SSt Q5/Q8/Q� O �O O FOR INSTALLATION PROCEDURE) (TYPICAL OF 4 2 1" GABLE BRIDGE DOUBLE T-LINE BRAGKET � l�' PER PLATE) 6" 8" SUPPORT F057 WITH STANDARD SNAP-IN SHEET TITLE \ (SEE DETAIL I/A-3) CLIPS EXISTING SOIL % :� MIN., PROPOSED VALMONT DOUBLE GABLE ROUTING DETAILS o 0 0 o T-LINE BRAGKET APPROVED EQUAL SPACED @ 3'-0" ON SHEET NUMBER REV. CENTER (A5 REQUIRED) 4 GE DETAIL AT CONCRETE SLAB 5 BASE ELATE DETAIL AT GONGRETE SLAB 7 BRAGKET ELEVATIONGABLE GRID Ixl7 SCALE: 3/4"= 1 '-O" 24x36 SCALE: 1 1/2"=1 '-O" IIxl7 SCALE: 5/4"= l '-C)" 24x36 SCALE: 1 112"= I'-O" Ixl7 SGALE:N.T.5. 24x36 SCALE:: N.T.S. L NOTES: AkTA%k I. ALL MATERIAL TO BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED 2. SECURE EQUIPMENT TO UNISTRUT BRACKETS UTILIZING UNISTRUT CHANNEL NUTS. 3. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MOUNTED TO UNI57RUT FRAME AS PERDESIGN u GOVERNING CODE REQUIREMENTS. Z GROUP ~~ GAP (WELD ALL AROUND) (TYPICAL OF 2) 2" 2" ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PROPOSED LITHONIA 50OW LAMP P. O. BOX 3 MODEL "500-120-LPI TO BE OPERATED ON A 60 MINUTE TIMER) HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732 . 888 . 6210 0 FAX : 732 . 847 . 4335 N GALVANIZED UNISTRUT PI000 (TYPICAL) QUANTITY AND LOCATION Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. = AS REQUIRED TO MOUNT EQUIPMENT NJC # AI 13345 NJ U# G 3E 62091 vEER PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB - NY - # 028992-1 NY - # 075384 1/2114 U-BOLT (TYPICAL OF 2 PER r ® ' CT - # 22375 UNI57RUT) S"x8"xl/2" BASE PLATE PA - # 061412 N PROPOSED PTG CABINET ON PROPOSED 2 1/21'4 SCHEDULE 40 GABLE SUPPORT POSTS BRIDGE SUPPORT POST WELDED ONTO 8"x8"xl/2" BASE PLATE (TYPICAL OF 2) —iN � z /2 4 ANCHOR SET 2 /8" INTO HILTI-HIT HY-150 11/20/Oq ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMo PROPOSED TIMER SWITCH SYSTEM (SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS 5" 2 FOR INSTALLATION PROCEDURE) (TYPICAL OF 4 1 p m I 2 2 11/13/09 UPDATED PER WENTWMMENT5 DGa PMo m PER PLATE) o MIN. �p 05/51/011551 FOR GONSTRUOTION JE5 PMo a PROPOSED 21/2" NOMINAL REVISION DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PIPE WITH REV. DATE DE5GRIPTION D eYN GHBYD. GAP (TYPICAL OF 2) SEAL '•,nocr 1 o� 8"x8"xl/2" BASE PLATE W/ (4) 1/2"0 HILTI ` " ' o ip HIT HY-150 W/ 2 /8" EMBEDMENT INTO /4 = CONCRETE SLAB (SEE DETAIL 2/A-4) �ry p%2a, 'o a ii " ii All ii ii THI5 DOGUMEN 5 THE DE51GN, PROPERTY 4 II �I d lii ii ` a ii COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND d FOR THE EXCLUSIVE U5E BY THE TITLE CLIENT, ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN GON5ENT OF THE CREATOR 15 51 PROHIBITED SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION I UTILITY MOUNT DETAIL 2 POST BASE PLATE PLAN metroPCS IIx17 SCALE:1/2"= 1'-O" 24x36 SCALE: 3/4"= 1 '-0" Ixl7 SCALED/4"= 11-0" 24x36 SCALE: I I/2"= 1'-0" New York, L.L.C. NOTES: I. THE ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF THE 5P5 ANTENNA SHALL BE IN AGCORDANGE WITH THE FINAL RF REPORT. sire �oB#: NY 7E tj 2. THE GPS ANTENNA MOUNT 15 DESIGNED TO FASTEN TO A STANDARD 1-1/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER, SCHEDULE 40, GALVANIZED STEEL OR STAINLESS STEEL PIPE. THE PIPE MUST NOT BE THREADED AT THE ANTENNA MOUNT END. THE PIPE SHALL BE GUT TO THE REQUIRED LENGTH MTM Joe#: O�iMP5TS008 (MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES) USING A HAND OR ROTARY PIPE GUTTER TO A55URE A SMOOTH AND PERPENDICULAR GUT. A HACK 5AW SHALL NOT BE SITE INFORMATION USED. THE GUT PIPE END SHALL BE DEBURRED AND SMOOTH IN ORDER TO SEAL AGAINST THE NEOPRENE GASKET ATTACHED TO THE ANTENNA MOUNT. 3. THE MOUNTING PLATE SHALL BE FABRICATED AS 5HOWN AND ATTACHED TO THE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT STRUCTURE USING U-BOLT5. THE SUPPORT PIPE SHALL THEN BE ATTACHED TO THE MOUNTING PLATE USING THE OVERSIZE U-BOLTS PROVIDED To ALLOW ADJUSTMENT. IT IS GPS ANTENNA (SUPPLIED CRITICAL THAT THE GPS ANTENNA 15 MOUNTED SUCH THAT IT IS WITHIN 2 DEGREES OF VERTICAL AND THE BASE OF THE ANTENNA IS WITHIN 2 BY METRO PC5) 7 / DEGREES OF LEVEL. TOWN OF SOUTHOL D I 4" � �q _ I/4" THICK PLATE 3„ 5" 2" I" � LL OF I � IATE � ALS DESIGN TYPE: TYP. 2 TILT HOLES FOR ADJUSTMENT QUANTITY 7/16" x 1/8" SLOTTED HOLE MOUNTING S o 4 ITEM# DESCRIPTION (each) GOLOGAT ON FOR 1-1/4" NOMINAL BRACKET PLATE DIAMETER PIPE 3 1/2" NOMINAL o11 O 1-1/411 NOMINAL DIAMETER sch. 40 x 18" LG. MIN 55 OR GALV. PIPE DRAWN BY: SHEGKED BY. DATE: DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 1/2''4 COAX GABLE MINIMUM BENDING RMe SSt O5/OP�IOa cn _ PIPE BY OTHERS (FIELD O2 PLATE 3/8 x 4 I/4 x 21" LG. GALV.(A-36) VERIFY) RADIUS PER MANUFACTURERS STANDARD STD, U-BOLT FOR 3 1/2" NOMINAL DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PIPE 2 SHEET TITLE 2 HOLE LUG (TYP) O W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND WASHER, GALV. 11-411 5TO. U-BOLT FOR 1 1/4" NOMINAL DIAMETER PIPE N DOUBLE HEX UTILITY FRAME ELEVATIONS O NUTS AND WASHER, GALV. (SEE NOTE 3) 2 4 GPS MOUNTING DETAIL MOUNTING BRACKET PLATE 5P5 ANTENNA MOUNTING BRAGKET NOTE: 1/16" x 2-7/8" SLOTTED (5EE I/E-4 FOR MORE INFORMATION) GG TO VERIFY ALL MATERIALS, QUANTITIES AND MODEL NUMBERS WITH METRO PGS PRIOR TO HOLE FOR 3 1/2" NOMINAL NOTE: ORDERING. SHEET NUMBER REN/. DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 OVERSIZE U-BOLT PROVIDED To PIPE, U-BOLT WITH DOUBLE ALLOW +/- 2' TILT/ADJU57MENT TO NUTS AND WASHERS. (TYP.) ACHIEVE TOLERANCE. A 3 01=5 MOUNTING DETAIL ;q IlxI-7 SCALE: 1 1/211= 1 '-O" 24x36 SCALE: 3"= I1-0" G„ i I Il x 2' SLOTTED HOLE FOR 1/2' 0 BOLTI 2-2-" R'-23" I'-2 " -8 " 23" -8 1'-5-" EU ITYP. OF 16J -7 4 9 4 2 4 8 EAR OF CABINETS D E S I G N u REAR OF CABINETS G R O TJ P z A R C H I T E C T U R E In T — — — — -- - - - _ - - — - - - - - - - - - - o I_ ° ° o o _ — _ _._ ENGINEERING - - -- F - —�-6n -- o I— _ W6 15 W6x15 P. O. BOX 3 2 v 1 1'-2" FUTURE MODGELL 11 PROPOSED MODGELL 1 PROPOSED BATTERY III j FUTURE BATTERY HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 _i CABINET x 1 CABINET If vx CABINET r 6 TEL: 7 3 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 2 10 W6 15 W6x15 USI FAX : 732 . 847 . 4335 o o o o - - - - - o B -- —��� o-- -.. , - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms P.E. r�`� nil- -1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER -1LNJ - # AI 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 NY - # 028992-1 NY - # 075384 FRONT OF CABINETS CT - # 22375 PA - # 061412 4 1/2`0 HILTI HIT HY-150 WITH 4 A-5 FRONT OF CABINETS 1/2" MIN. EMBEDMENT. 10'xl6'x8" THICK CONCRETE 5 STAGGER BOLTS AT 3'-0" O.C. PAD (SEE DETAIL 3/A-5) A-5 EACH SIDE OF WEB NOTES: b FUTURE CABINETS I. TOP OF STEEL ELEVATION 10" ABOVE GRADE LEVEL. A 5 10Y4'x8" THICK CONCRETE PAD A 11/20/01 ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMo 2. FOR MOUNTING HOLE LOCATIONS SEE DETAIL 2/A-5. (SEE DETAIL 3/A-5) �j 11/13/01 UPDATED PER GLIENiGOMMENTS DGa PMo I EQUIPMENT SUPPORT F=RAME PLAN 2 MOUNTING HOLE LOCATION PLAN Ixl7 SCALE: 3/8"=1 '-O" 24x36 SCALE: 3/4"= 1 '-O" IIx17 SCALE: 3/81 = 1 '-0" 24x36 SCALE 3/4"= 1 '-O" z 08/31/09155UEDFOR CONSTRUGTION JEs PMo REV. DATE REVISION DRAWN GHKD. PROP05FO 8" THICK 4000 P51 CONCRETE SLAB WITH DESCRIPTION BY BY 2 LAYERS OF 6x6-8/8 WELDED WIRE FABRIC, SEE L4x4x1/4 (BEYOND) TYP) STEEL T BE PLUMB SEAL PLANS FOR PAD SIZE (TOP TO B . E LIGHTLY BRUSHED) LEVEL, SIKA NON-SHRINK W6 (TYP.) GROUT AS REQUIRED PROPOSED CHAMFERED E06E N _ 0 aEXISTING GRADE y,r in P,Rq W6 A - APPROX. —x—x—x �! r `tFIN15H GRADE / a, -14 4" 4.: o u a - -��L n ) (TYP.) (TYP.) .4A s Z -A �- O "' .� / _ -X—X—X--X �L. a] v III Zi /S : — �7�=L[t ��nr—rrrm—r Tr�rr�rl�r�r� rrrl� ri — I�_ nr- t•` TYP. THIS DOGU NT IS THE DE51GN, PROPERTY t FOR .' COPYRIGHT Or 'THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC. AND 4'-I I1,, DUPLIE EXCLUSIVE USE WIYHOUTEEXIPRE56 WRITTENY L4x4x /4 CONSENT OP THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 101-01, 4" THICK LAYER OF 3/4" DIA. 3/41`0 A325 H16H STRENGTH CRUSHED STONE BASE BOLT (TYP) P/\/��. EXISTING UNDISTURBED 12`0EMB HILT( HIT STAGE WITH T MIN. (SEE E THICK CONCRETE PAD (3/8"BEYOND) GUSSET PLATE metro■ V� O VIRGIN 501E EMBEDMENT. STAGGER BOLTS AT (SEE DETAIL 3/A-5) (BEYOND) (TYP.) 3'-0" O.G. EACH SIDE OF WEB New York, L.L.C. 5 DETAIL 4 DETAIL 5 DETAIL IIxl7 SCALE: 3/4"= 1'-0" 24x36 SCALE: 3/8"=1 '-O" IIxl7 SCALE: 1/2"= 1 '-O" 24x36 SCALE: "= I'-0` Ixl7 SCALE: 3/4"= 1 '-O" 24x36 SCALE: 1 1/2"= 1'-0" SITE JOB#: NY7515 MTM JOB#: OaMPSTSOOB FUTURE SITE INPORM4TION CABINETS _ __ MODGELL I --TI (BEYOND) BATTERY CABINET TTC^NOOIF SO THOD ii L-- ------1 = mini mIEI�PIEI I I DESIGN TYPE I I nllmlmllmlm I Iyn1 Cn I I V�II�I�11H3ivl� I I'll1 I I _ GOLOGATION TOP OF CONCRETE FUTURE MODCELL BATTERY FUTURE YII „ MODCELL CABINET CABINET BATTERY ( PAD 0'-4 AGL (MAX.) DRAWN BY: GHEGKED BY: DATE: cABwer RIM SSt 05/08/09 W6 CABINET li TOP OF CONCRETE PAID W6 FINISH GRADE AGL (MAX.) SHEET TITLE FOUNDATION DETAILS AND mTmm T III 11111E Ih - m zN lmm mID + � mm � I m FINISH GRADE - ° m m m m E m m m EOU PMENT ELEVA71 ONS 10'x14'x8" THICK 10'x14'x8" THICK CONCRETE CONCRETE PAD (SEE SHEET NUMBER REV. PAD (SEE DETAIL 3/A-5) q_g DETAIL 3/A-5) 6 EQUIPMENT ELEVATION (FRONT VIEW) 7 EQUIPMENT ELEVATION (SIDE VIEW) 8 NOT USED —.:; IIxl7 SCALE: 1/4"=1 '-O" 24x36 SCALE: I/2"= 1 '-O" Ixl7 SCALE: I/4"= 1'-0" 24x36 SCALE: 1/2"= 1 '-0" IIxl7 SCALE: 24x36 SCALE: 4 1 r,+ DESIGNu GROUP - ARC H ITEC TU RE ENGINEERING P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 TEL: 732 . 888 . 6210 FAX : 732 . 847 . 4335 Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER IN57ALL (3) STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE AT NJ - # AI 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 - # 075384 NY - # 028992-1 N' TDP OF FENCE CT - # 22375 PA - # 061412 11/2"0 (INNER DIAMETER) AELDED GATE FRAME (TYPICAL OF 2) PROVIDE (1) FORKED LATCH A55EMBLY AND PADLOCK EYE (TO PERMIT 4'-0" O O OPERATION FROM EITHER SIDE OF GATE) ZL MAXIMUM 1/214 (INNER DIAMETER) 5GHEDULE 40 11/20/01 ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMO RAIL (TYPICAL @ TOP, MID d BOTTOM) o A 11/13/01 UPDATED PER 6UENT COMMENT5 DGa PMO x > II /X; v� h 08/31/01 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION JEs PMO k�y�`/ v / v� '� ��� � ' v 3 1/2" NOMINAL DIAMETER (IN51DE � \� DRAwN GHKD. REVISION , v '� , v,i IA / �< v', ,�,, ;1 REV. DATE DE5ORIF7I0N BY BY ��z� / v vv / „ /v,�, DIAMETER) 5GHEDULE 40 CORNER POST x v� k v r, X / j v � _ v �Aj' �� ���\ i ;1 ��� ��V SEAL " NOMINAL DIAMETER 5GHEDULE 40 PIPE / > � v r 1< v r�� �C MID RAIL BRACE (� GATE) w _� y/� � x x/ CA Ix .v GAUGE GALVANIZED (2" MESH) CHAIN x >� CSF , 7 LINK FENCE FABRIC \ �T/ 1 \ ,� THIS DOCUMENT IS THE DESIGN, PROPERTY E COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND / \ , i /\j'• ,' � / �k •,r,\/ x '\ FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY \, "A' C \\F j />� N� /�/, �, \ ,` j, ,. 4" THICK LAYER 3/4" GRAVEL /' _ / fr \ ^ '\ DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN �� COMPOUND SURFACING ,'V `✓ �/ A/ CONSENT OF THE CREATOR IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Ll - metroPCS \ � \ ` '•, � \ ° New York L.L.C. vi/ SAA ° /� / �,A Q ! 12"0x4'-O" DEEP P057 FOOTING, FILL WITH �, \ vi ���LL n 517E �oB : 4000 P51 CONCRETE. (TYPICAL) i ' \ MTM JOB#: OCl M-IFS '5000 \ . \ 517E INFORMATION EXISTING SOIL 41405 iZOUTE= � 5 PE C:)NIG TOWN OF SO THOLD 2x6 WOOD EDGING AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER OF COMPOUND, SUPPORT DESIGN TYFE: WITH 5/4"x4"x20" WOOD STAKE5 (POUNDED INTO GROUND TILL SECURE) @ GOLOGATION 4'-0" ON CENTER DRAWN BY: GHEOKED BY. DATE: RMe SSt 05/05/01 SHEET TITLE FENCE � GATE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER REV. 'OVA& I FENCE AND GATE ELEVATION A _ 6 .2 IIxl-7 SCALE:3/5"= 1 '-0" 24x36 SCALE: 3/4"= 1 '-0" ._ jI. UNIVERSAL MOUNTING HARDWARE KITS SEE DETAIL B D E S I G NU THREADED RODS G �S _ EXISTING TOWER LEG i i (VERIFY DIAMETER) �� = G R O U P . 31/2" O.D. PIPE x4'-8I/2"+/- LON6 ARCHITECTURE 51/2" O.D. PIPE x41-8 1/2"+/- LONG ENGINEERING HISS. 31'x3"x1/41' TUBE P. O. BOX 3 TOWER LEO PROPOSED HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 2 3/8" O.D. STIFFENER ARM PIPE TO FAGE MOUNTED TIE-BAGK TO EXISTING TOWER LES 2 3/8" O.D. HORIZONTAL HEAVY TEL: 7 3 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 2 10 PIPE, PART #U5F-2U LADDER FAX : 7 3 2 . 8 4 7 . 4 3 3 5 ASSEMBLY BY ROHN OF Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. APPROVED ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 3 • EOUAL NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 A- 1 NY - # 028992-1 QCT - # 223754 • SUPPORT TUBE PA - # 061412 TO BE ATTACHED „I TO EXISTING PROP05ED TOWER LES ANTENNA (TYP. OF 4'-0" 2, PER SEGTOR) • . A 0'-6" • Z�\ 11/20/09 155UED FOR FILING 17Ga PMo >A A 11/13/01 UPDATED PER WENTXHKNTS DGa PMo 2 3/8"OJ PIPE MAST SUPPORT TO FRAME (TYP. OF 3 PER FRAME) (5EE DETAIL 2/A-1) 08/51/09 155UED FOR 60115TRZTION LF-5 PMo PROPOSED SITE PRO I MODEL# U51`10-2% 2 REVISION DRAWN GHKD STANDOFF FRAME OR APPROVED EQUAL A_ REV. DATE DESGRIFTION BY BY MOUNTED TO TOWER SUPPORT FROP05ED NOTE: PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTING FRAME DEPIGTED 15 BY: 517E SEAL PRO 1, ING. 15 05ER AVENUE LADDER CLIP HAUPPAU6E, NY ppc AMER i. ce AN APPROVED EQUAL MAY BE UTILIZED. 't,n,m aF PROPOSED I ANTENNA 7-ARM FLAN VIEW ANTENNA (TYP. OF "� Q 2, PER SECTOR) c INI-7 5GALE:3/8" = I' 0" 24x3b SGALE ": 1/4" = 1'-O 2 3/8" O.D. PIPE MAST SUPPORT TO J-BOLT ASS'Y THIS DOCUMENT IS THE DESIGN, PROPERTY $ COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DE516N GROUP, INC." AND FRAME (TYP. OF 2 FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY PER FRAME) DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE GRFATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 2 5/8" O.D. PIPE MAST SUPPORT TO FRAME (TYP. 3 1/2" OD. PIPE OF 2 PER FRAME) x4'-8 1/2"+/- LONG metroPCS 2 3/8" O.D. New York, L.L.C. HORIZONTAL PIPE, H.5.5. 3"x3"xl/4" 2 3/8" O.D. STIFFENER ARM PIPE TO PART #USF-2U TUBE (TYP) TIE-BAGK TO EXISTING TOWER LES /) A SITE JOB#: NY73 S Sce71,, f'!-N M7M SOB#: OCIMPSTS005 517E INFORMATION TOWER LEG 4140E; ROUTE= z � TOWER LE6 o PE=GON I G, NY I I c�f 5a BEYOND m TOWN OF SOUTHOL]D PROPOSED PROPOSED SITE PRO ' ANTENNA (TYP. OF I MODEL# USFIO-296 DESIGN TYPE: 2, PER SECTOR) STANDOFF FRAME TO .BOLT ASSY, SUPPORT PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNAS GOLOGATI ON 2111+/- SPLICE PLATE DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: 4 PROPOSED SITE PRO I MODEL + # / y� } Q RMB SSt 05/OPJ/O4 U5FIO-2% STANDOFF FRAME OR 616 APPROVED EQUAL MOUNTED TO SHEET TITLE TOWER SUPPORT PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNAS 3 1/2" O.D. PIPE ANTENNA MOUNT ,AND x4'-81/2"+/- 73"+/ GABLE LADDER DETAILS LONG (BEYOND) 4 SHEET NUMBER REV. 2 ANTENNA T-ARM ELEVATION VIEW 3 ANTENNA T-ARM SIDE VIEW 4 GABLE LADDER AT TOWER IIxl7 SGALE:3/8" = 1'-0" 24x36 SGALE: 1/4" = I '-O° Ilxl7 SGALE:3/8" = 1'-0" 24x36 SGALE: 1/4" = I '-O" IIXI-7 SGALIE:N.T.S. 24x36 SGALE: N.T.S. I , I A&IFS& LOT: 12 DESIGN RES. GROUPz / - ARC H I T E C T U R E LOT: 13 ENGINEERING SCHOOL LOT: PROPERTY OWNER: LOT: PROPERTYOWNER:LUM P. O. BOX3 75-5-1.1 JILL BLUM 00' RADIUS LINE / \ PO BOX 151 74-5-15POLBOX 51 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 PECONIC, NY 11958 PECONIC, NY 11958 LOT: IS o TEL: 7 3 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 210 O• 75-5-2 STEVEN SYGMAN &MARIA FAX : 7 3 2 . 8 4 7 . 4 3 3 5 O., p 0 -10.9 ZIP PECONIC WELLS LLC I �� 86-1 PO BOX 121 7175TH AVE gyp, PECONIC, NY 11958 FLOOR 19 LOU Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. NEWYORK,NY10022 ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - # GE 36209 NJ - # Al13345 75-5-3 STELLA SAKOWIC - # 4 C-1-I PO BOX 173 86-1 PELLEGRINI PECONIC LLC NY - # 028992-1 NY - # 0753075388 LOT:3.5 PECONIC, NY 11958 23005 RT 25 CI - # 22375 AGR. -__-___•.___-_._____..-.__.._ LOT: 1.1 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 a p AGR 75-5-4 ALICE MALINAUSKAS PO BOX 13 86-1-9.3 PELLEGRINI PECONIC LLC I 0 I I PECONIC, NY 11958 23005 RT 25 I I LOT: 5.2 75-5-5 SOPHIEANDRADE CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 � 1 REG CENTER I PO BOX 86-1-4.4 DAN I EL BEISN ER&JEAN EEN PECONIC, NY 11958 PO BOX 292 /2\ 11/20/01 ISSUED FOR FILING DGq F'Ma RESIDENTIAL LOW LOT: 2 PECONIC, NY119s8 I �_` �1 RES. 75-5-6 MARINA TSOKANOS,STEVEN&ELAINE KOKKI NOS 11/13/01 UPDATED PER WENT GOMMENT5 DCCT PMO ' DENSITY (2 ACRES) I I I PO BOX 229 86-1-4.5 WILLIAM&KARRIAN N SEI FERT,GEOR( ' I PECONIC, NY 11958 Po Box Cas' OS/ PECONIC, NY 11958 31/0q 155UED FOR GON5TRUGTION JE5 PMo I _ I j � 75-5-7 ELAINE IATHAM ' I O 'SLOT: 3 I PO BOX 264 REVISION i 86-1-4.6 THOMAS CLDUDIA FERRAJIUOLO REV. DATE DRAWN GHKD. 5 J RES. PECONIC, NY 11958 PO BOX 350 DESCRIPTION BY BY ' ! I PECONIC, NY 11958 SEAL LOT:15 SECTION: 086 I 75-5-9 DAVID LAFRENIERE ' - 910 TOTHI LL ROAD LOT: BLOCK: I ' � � O 86-1-4.27 RICHMOND SHORES PROP. OWNER AS Dqq AGR, AGR. SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 G ' LOT: 3.1 � ,LOT: 4 PO Box n3 Ur; I RES. I I PECONIC, NY 11958 ¢Z4a JNA 2j20 �O� 75-5-10 UL EMILY ROSE COP. 41965 RT 25 86-1-4.29 RICHMOND SHORES PROP, OWNER AS PECONIC, NY 11958 PC BOX 273 /LOT: 5 a� gv k AG SEGTONI: 0"15 L, _ I �/ LOT: 15.4 I I PECONIC, NY 11958 • 0289 OQ' I _- RES. 75-5-11 EUGENE G&MARY ELLEN GRIMES y ADRIGULTURAL EiLOCIK: 5 . I LOT: 6 = AGR. 0 NEN �% RES. / 'r 41705RT25/1PO 1958 503 _ 8&1-F.1 GREGORY W_ESTERLUND CONSERVATION � r/ LOT: 14.1 i , ' ,J _ PECONIC, NY 11958 41640 RT 25 THIS DOGUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY 4 2 AGRE5 I �I B PECONIC, NY 11958 COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND I GENERAL BUSINESS 75-5-12 SLAMA CHARLES REV TRUST FOR THE EXCLUSIVE U5E BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY I I -I DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN I -+ Y ---' LOT: 7 ZONE 45 PRINCES PINERD 86-1-6.2 ADOLPH WESTERLUND&THERSA S. CONSENT OF THE CREATOR I5 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. L,- I TOWNSHIP OF ' RES, I NORWALK, CT06850 41700 RT 25 SOUTHoLD HAY C _ I I _____ I l PECONIC,NY 11958 C] __ DEPARTMENT L••_ 75-5-13 BERRY&BERRY LLC I I PECONIC, Y 11958 R5001-01, 300' 0 41535 RT25 . ,.,.,, -•�_-� 8G1-7 SCOTT DESIMONE/MELISSA IHYATT-f etroPCS I 7 ICN Y11958 "'�.• ,,,,, . '. 41780 RT 25 � PECONIC N OQ I 5-1-13 TOWN OFSOUTHOLD New York, L.L.C. I �� BUSINESS O PO BOX 1179 86-1-8 THOMAS T. GRATTAN 1R. , I % ` LOT: 14 I SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 PO BOX 465 PECON ' /LLoT: GAR 86-515 HERODO NY 11958 DEALERSHIP 75-1-15. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITEJOB#: NY7515 ILOT: 13 2LEANING LOT: 12R rARPET IN EN _ _____, / - Poeoxm9 TUS DAMIANOS B ENINr VACANTBUSIDNE55TMTM JOB#SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 591-A BICYCLE PATHOjiMPSTS00r3r75-1-15.3 ML MAIN ROAD LLCPT,JEFFERSON, NY 11776� SITE INFORMATION _ FIRST 86-1-3.1 PHYLLISCATALANO LAND I f 770 PARK AVE UNIT IBAGLA55 , / LTDT: 1 -- I NEWYORK, NY 10021 45 DOWD STREET IJIAuroeoDr Bus ! R Lor: 15.3C) AGR. 75-1-15.4 ML MAIN ROAD LLC FARMINGDALE, NY11735 }=EGONILOT: 10 - I 770 PARK AVE 86-1-3.3 B&J REALITY TOwN O� T,H SOUOL�D RT25/MAIN ROAD (EXIST. SCENIC B!YWA � J / UNIT18A PO BOX 198 NEW YORK, NY 10021 PECON IC, NY 11958 .DESIGN TYPE: _ LOT: 8 ® '�"®'® ��� 75-1-14 LAIIBROA LLC 86-1-3.4 BSJ REALITY 0 - - 53NDRTHWESTDR \ 0� - I-i RES. �Pv, - PD Box 198 LOT: 4.4 \ LOT: --J -J_I--- 0 L NORTHPORT, NY 11768 PECONIC, NY 11958 �iOLOrA-FION �1 1 SEGTION: OS6 l RES LOT: 4.21 6.1 / RES. i �- ,LOT; q. / DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: LOT: RES, 4 L\ 5 R 5` Lor: 7 �_g� . o � � LOT: lAGROA / RMe SSt 05/08/01 L RES 5 � RES. RESIDENTIAL LOW � SHEET TITLE/ DENSITY (2 AGRE5) / S PROPERY F- T LOT: 4.6 / 500 ' RADU MNP OWNERS LIST / RES. RE51DEN71AL LOW DENSITY (I ACRES) LOT: 4.7 / LOT: 4.27 R REU SHEET NUMBE VAGANT LAND / O / LOT: q.3 1 500' RADIUS MAP - ASR' / 2 SOO' R�DUIS PiROPERTY OWNERS LIST xl7 SGALE:I "=200'-O" 24x36 SCALE: "= 100'-O' IIxl7 SGALE:N.T.5. 24x56 SGALE: N.T.S. 2�- IAII�► r11� H o DESIGNz m m GROUP ARC HITECTU RE ENGINEERING MOUNTING TEMPLATE OUTDOOR ENCL05URE P. O. BOX 3 A �• HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 FLOOR CONTACT AREA '�, TEL: 7 3 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 210 AG SURGE SUPPRE55OR FAX : 7 3 2 . 8 4 7 . 4 3 3 5 PLAN @ EQUIPMENT CABINET I 1 2'-I B/b' LouCT , AIA Robert R Toms, P.E. I +' ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 F LATCH N 992-1 Y - # 028NY - # 075384 07 ' CT - # 22375 LOAD CENTER PA - # 061412 I ;II . +' HINGED DEADFRONT f } �� 0 ®®® ®C + i' /2\ 11/20/01 155UED FOR FILING DGa PMo GFCI CONVENIENCE OUTLET I� Z II/I5/09 UPPATEPPERWENT60HOT5 DGa PMo I' 2 P051TION TERMINAL BLOCK (OPTIONAL) + � 06/31/0q ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION JEs PMo PUNCH DOWN BLOCK O REV I5I ON DA O •' REV. ATE DESCRIPTION D A N GBYD. SURGE SUPPRESSION (OPTIONAL) SECURE NEW METRO PGS EQUIPMENT CABINET SEAL TO NEW STEEL DUNNAGE AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS (TYP.) WIND STOP MULTIPOINT GROUND BAR *** NOT TO SCALE o 1 EQUIPMENT GABINET DETAILS xl7 SCALE: 1/4"= 11-011 24x36 SCALE: THIS DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY a COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND FOR THE EXCLUSNE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT, ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PROPOSED AREA: AREA FOR (1) MODGELL CABINET - 35.315" x 52" = 1.81 50. FT. AREA FOR (I) BATTERY CABINET - 28.51" x 28.14" = 5.715G. FT. metr OPCS AREA FOR (1) PTC CABINET - 30" x 12" = 2.5 50. FT. 2 6 4'-4" New York, L.L.C. V TOTAL AREA OF CABINETS - 1.81' + 5.11' + .2.5' = 16.08 50. FT. ON SITE JOB#: NY78 S " MTM JOB#: OqMPSTS008 PLAN @ FTC Box m SITE INFORMATION 4 5/16" 2:I 2:_ -I6—I�- 4140 i�OUTE= � � r 4 HOLES ((TYP) .21-51 -5 PE GON G, NY I q 5,5 ° TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - m � : DESIGN TYPE: S _B�: Z: e ci 2 , MOUNVTING BRACKET TEMPLATE GOLOGATI ON 6 \ / \ NEW POWER TELCO CABINET (FT() �Y m DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: MOUNTING TEMPLATE SECURE NEW SHEET TITLE PLAN @ BATTERY GABINET METRO PGS FTC CABINET TO NEW UNISTRUT FRAME AS PER MANUFACTURERS ELEVATION SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DETAIL IIA-4) EOUIRMENT SFEGIFIGA710N5 SHEET NUMBER REV. 2 BATTERY GABINET DETAILS B FTG GABINET DETAILS = 2 Ilxl7 SCALE: 1/4"= 1 '-O" 24x36 SCALE: 1/2"= 1'-O" IIxl7 SCALE: 1/4"=1 '-O" 24x36 5GALE: 1/2"= 1 '-O" 1 ANTENNA SCHEDULE GABLE SCHEDULE PROPOSED 'CDMA' PANEL ANTENNA: KATNREIN MODEL NO. 8m L NTE4 SECTOR RX/TX MANUFACTURER MODEL# GABLE LENGTH DIA. LABELHall A 80° 0° MDT 0° EDT TX/RX KATHRIEN 800-10504 TX/RX 125± 1 5/8" 1 RED Add 641^,hi,,5 D E S I G N U °pth 1, " G R O U P z O° MDT O° EDTTX/RX TX/RX 125± 15/8" 2 RED � 2.1;' ARCHITECTURE B 180° 0° MDT 00 EDTTX/RX KATHRIEN 800-10504 TX/RX 125± 1 5/8" 1 BLUE ENGINEERING O° MDT 0° EDT TX/RX TX/RX 125± 1 5/8" 2 BLUE P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 G 320° 0° MDT 0° EDT TX/RX KATHRIEN 800-10504 TX/RX 125± 1 5/8" I GREEN 1O ' TEL: 732 . 888 . 6210 O° MDT D° EDTTX/RX TX RX 125± 15/8" 2 GREEN FAX : 732 . 847 . 4335 54.1" x 0.P' = 2321 sa FT. Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. FRONT VIEW BIDE VIEW ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 NY - # 028992-1 NY - # 075384 CT - # 22375 PA - # 061412 A11/20/OlI ISSUED FOR FILING ora PMo z 11/13/0q UPDATED PER WENTGOWENTS DGa PMo 08/31/09 155UED FOR 60N5TRUGTION JEs PMo REV. DATE REV15ION DRAWN GHKD. DESCRIPTION BY BY SEAL -� hi0GC�9i FO BILL OF MATERIALS ALPHA ALPHA BETA BETA GAMMA BETA ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA c, NO. QTY. DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODGELL LUCENT THIS DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY Q 2 EZBFO BATTERY CABINET LUCENT COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND 3 - A7078J50 1/8"0 AIRGELL GOAXIAL GABLES TRILOGY GOMMUNIGATIONS, INC FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT, ANY DUPLICATION OR U5E WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN 4 - DFA07850 1/8"0 1/16 DIN (F) CONNECTOR TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC corvsENT of THE CREATOR Is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. L 5 - GK-578AC 1/8" GROUND KIT TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC NOTE: GABLE 2GABLE 3 GABLE 4 w GABLE 5 D GABLE 6 b C,5-UI218 7/8" WEATHERPROOFING KIT TRILOGY ,INC GG TO VERIFY ALL MATERIALS, rlletrOPCs 1 1,500 LF A7158J50 1 5/8"0 AIRGELL COAXIAL GABLES TRILOGY GOMMUNIGATIONS, INC OUANT1711ES AND MODEL NUMBERS J 8 24 PFAI5850 15/610 7/16 DIN (F) 6ONNEG70R TRILOGY GOMMUNIGATIONS, INC WITH METRO PGS PRIOR TO 9 24 6K-5158AC 1 5/8" GROUND KIT TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC ORDERINIG. 4 New York, L.L.C. v ITEM PART NUMBER QTY. 10 24 G54258 1 5/8" WEATHERPROOFING KIT TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC GABLE 1 860 10012 (131.2') 1 11 24 6' JAU012OMDM6 1/2"0 JUMPER 7/16 DIN (M) CONNECTORS TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC RED GABLE 2 860 10009 (16.4') 1 5ITE JOB#. NY7515 12 6 REMOTE ELEGTRIGAL TILT KATHRIEN BLUE GABLE 3 860 10060 (32.81) 1 13 6 ANTENNA - MODEL # 800 10504 KATHRIEN GREEN GABLE 4 860 10009 (16.4') 1 MTM JOB#: OgMPST5008 GABLE 5 860 10060 (32.81) 1 SITE INFORMATION ANTENNA GALE INC NOTES GABLE 6 860 10009 (16.4') I 1. COLORED ELECTRICAL TAPE SHALL MARK EACH END OF EVERY GABLE A5 CLOSE TO EACH END AS 4140 a �O U TE z J POSSIBLE. PANEL ANTENNA TERMINATE IN RGU 860 10025 b PE GON G, NY �ts8 2. IN ADDITION TO TAPE MARKINGS, EACH END OF PPG CABINET EVERY GABLE SHALL ALSO BE LABELED WITH BRA55 STANDARD JUMPERS AT BT5 TOWN OF E�OUTHOLD TAGS (SUPPLIED BY OWNER) INSCRIBED WITH NUMBER TX GABLES AND GOLOR OF TAPE MARKINGS AS INDICATED IN 6'-0' STANDARD JUMPERS DESIGN TYPE: THE ABOVE SCHEMATIC,. THIS SYSTEM 15 TO BE USED FOR ALL GOLORS. 3. ALL TAPE MARKINGS SHOULD BE DONE IN BT5 GOLOGATION SEGUENCE FROM THE NORTH WORKING CLOCKWISE AS SHOWN IN THE SCHEMATIC ABOVE. TYPIGAL SECTOR GABLE ROUTING DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ANTENNA AND JUMPER GABLES WITH DRIP LOOPS TO PREVENT MINIMUM GABLE BENDING RADIUS RMB SSt 05/08/O�f UNDESIRABLE WATER RUN-OFF. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL GABLE RADIUS SHEET TITLE GABLE SUPPORTS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SPACING OF 3'-0" ON CENTER. �T N�ORNI/�T O`1 /2"4 (A7012J50) 6" 6. CONTRACTOR WILL RECORD THE LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBERS OF ALL ANTENNAS, ANTENNA 7/8"O (A7078J50) 10" CONTROLLER MOTORS, AND THEIR CORRESPONDING 1-5/8"0 (A7I58J50) 20" INSTALLED LOCATION AT THE TIME OF GONSTRUCTION. SHEET NUMBER REV. 1. ALL ANDREWS MOTORS ARE GENDER SPEGIFIG, AND WILL BE WIRED STARTING WITH THE MALE END OF THE GABLE AT THE BTS AND CONTINUE ALONG THE RUN FOLLOWING THE "FEMALE UP ROLE"' ANTENNA GABLE SCHEMATIC I Ix17 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 24x36 SGALE: . _ ,i DESIGN CRITERIA ABBREVIATIONS AND LABELS &L 11 I. ELEGTRIG: PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 205V OR 24OV, 2P, 3 WIRE CIRCUIT FROM A RELIABLE SOURCE TO THE COMMUNICATION CABINET. THI5 AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR MSB MASTER GROUND BAR SOURCE SHALL BE LOCKED ON WITH A GB LOCK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE (5) SPARE FUSES WHEREVER A FUSED DISCONNEGT I5 AFS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE 555 SECTOR GROUND BAR D E S I G N REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY (BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION 15 STARTED) THAT THE POWER SOURCE 15 BETWEEN 206V AND 24OV AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE MLO MAIN LUGS ONLY LINE TO LINE. IF IT 15 NOT BETWEEN THE SPECIFIED VOLTAGE, THEN GALL THE ARGHITEGT. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LABELED WITH r. C,01\11;)IJ17 N NEUTRAL.GB CIRCUIT BREAKER NEC NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE G R O U P z A BLACK PLASTIC TAG WITH WHITE LETTERS ' METRO PGS ENGRAVED IN IT. 2. UTILITY METER: IF A UTILITY METER 15 SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS, IT 15 THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC PNL PANEL A R C HITECTU R E NSPECTIONS, GUT-IN CARDS, ETC., THAT ARE REQUIRED TO SET THE METER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY TO VERIFY TUBING PP POWER PANEL ENGINEERING METER AND TAP LOCATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THE ARCHITECT BMC BEGINS THE PAPERWORK WITH THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND CAN GROUND PPG POWER PROTECTION CABINET PROVIDE THE ELECTRICAL DE7AILER5 NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR UTILITY RELATED QUESTIONS. IF TEMPORARY MG METAL GLAD GABLE FVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE P. O. BOX3 POWER 15 REQUIRED, ALL NEC AND/OR LOCAL ELECTRIC CODES SHALL BE ADHERED TO, CONTACT METRO PGS WIRELESS PRIOR TO MAKING MGB MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER RA RIGID ALUMINUM HAZLET, NEWJERSEY07730 TEMPORARY POWER CONNECTIONS. MDP MAIN D15TRIBUTION PANEL R65 RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL TEL: 73 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 210 5. TELEPHONE: PROVIDE A 2" CONDUIT WITH A 25 PAIR #22 AWG TAPPAN WIRE AND GABLE # 2250BB25/NBT/D5/BK/BLAGK OR EQUAL BY WP WEATHER PROOF FAX : 732 . 847 . 4335 COMMSCOPE FROM THE COMMUNICATIONS CABINET TO THE MAIN DEMARCATION POINT. FROM THE PPG CABINET TO THE BTS, PROVIDE Jumper: SUPPLIER: STONY POINT PN: 5PSM701-40 (40 FT 13.765-75PE) 40 FOOT LENGTH WITH 4-RJ45 CONNECTORS CRIMPED ON ONE END. Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. THE MAIN DEMARCATION POINT ALLOWS FOR THE LEAST AMOUNT OF NOISE AND THE M057 AMOUNT OF PROTECTION. FOR COST SAVINGS, A ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CLOSER DEMARCATION POINT MAY BE SPECIFIED IN MULTIPLE STORY BUILDINGS WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE TELEPHONE COMPANY. FOR NEW NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 TELEPHONE SERVICES IN NJ, NY 4 CT, PROVIDE A 4" CONDUIT WITH A DRAGLINE FROM THE SPECIFIED UTILITY POLE TO THE LOCATION OF THE NEW NY - # 028992-1 CT- # 023754 DEMARCATION POINT. PA - # 061412 4. CONDUIT ROUTING: THE ROUTING OF THE CONDUIT SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE EASIEST AND M057 PRACTICAL METHODS ARE USED WITHOUT IMPACTING THE BUILDING OWNER AND THE AESTHETIC APPEAL OF THE BUILDING. BECAUSE THE WORK BEING DONE IS IN EXISTING STRUCTURES, IT 15 IMPOSSIBLE TO SHOW EVERY JUNCTION BOX, LB, CONDUIT BEND, ETC. IN A TWO DIMENSIONAL PLAN. IT 15 FOR 7HI5 REASON THAT THE CONTRACTOR MUST VISIT THE 51TE BEFORE ACCEPTING THE OFFER AND UNDERSTAND THE TRUE INSTALLATION OBSTACLES THAT ARE UNIQUE TO THAT BUILDING. 5. EQUIPMENT:ALL PANELS, DISCONNECTS, AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SQUARE "D" UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ARCHITECT OR METRO PCS WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER. 2 11/20/09 ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMo 11/13/09 UPDATED PER 6LIENTI,OMMENT5 DGa PMo WIRING METHODS LEGEND 0 08/51/09 155UED FOR 60N5TRUGTION JE5 PMo I. GENERAL: ALL WIRING IN FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE CONGEALED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. IN UNFINISHED AREAS SUCH AS BASEMENTS, IDENTIFIERDESCRIPTION IDENTIFIER DESCRIPTION REV. DATE REV151ON DRAWN CHKD. MECHANICAL ROOMS, ELECTRICAL CLOSETS, ETC. WIRING SHALL BE ROUTED ON THE INTERIOR SURFACE. No WIRING SHALL BE ROUTED ON THE DESCRIPTION Br 5r OUTSIDE SURFACES OF THE BUILDING UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED. ALL NEC AND LOCAL ELECTRIC GOIDE5 SHALL BE ADHERED TO. ALL E EXISTING ELECTRIC NT NEW TELEPHONE CONDUCTORS SHALL BE COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEAL 2. BELOW GRADE (UNDERGROUND IN EARTH OR FILL): ALL CONDUITS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM BURIAL DEPTH OF 24". BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL NE NEW ELEGTRIG NT NEW UNDERGROUND CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN DIRECT BURIED SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITS. CONDUITS THAT ARE BURIED UNDER EARTH THAT HAVE HEAVY TELEPHONE VEHICLE TRAFFIC OVER IT SHALL BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE. CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM ALL AROUND AND BETWEEN — r CONDUITS. ALL ELBOWS USED WITH PVG CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC. ALL CONDUIT INSTALLED ABOVE FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE NE NEW UNDERGROUND i cO ELECTRIC T EXISTING UNDERGROUND - o SCHEDULE 80 PVG. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, A UTILITY MARK OUT SHALL BE DONE TO LOCATE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PICTURES SHALL TELEPHONE c y} BE TAKEN of ALL UNDERGROUND WORK TO BE VIEWED AT THE PUNGHLIST. "'' *7HF E EXISTINS UNDERGROUND '�,C� ;,;;�'i5. INDOORS (UNCLASSIFIED AREAS): ALL FEEDERS SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN EMT. ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL CON515T OF ELEGTRIG �PL PROPERTY LINE o. 0?PULLED CONDUCTORS IN EMT., EXCEPT15 AND 20 AMPERE I POLE LIGHTING RECEPTACLE, OR MISCELLANEOUS BRANCH CIRCUITS CONGEALEDc,vaABOVE SUSPENDED GEILINS5 OR WITHIN DRY WALLS SHALL CONSIST OF TYPE MG METAL GLAD GABLE IF ALLOWED BY CODE. CONNECTIONS TO T EXISTING TELEPHONECOMMUNICATION CABINETS AND VIBRATING EQUIPMENT SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT, MAXIMUM 6' IN rHls DOcuF "TIGN, PROPERTY t GO THIS OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND FOR THE EXCLUSIVE U5E BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY LENGTH' DUPLICATION OR U5E WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN 4. OUTDOORS OR INDOORS CLASSIFIED 'DAMP' OR 'WET' LOCATION: ALL FEEDERS AND BRANCH CIRCUITS SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 57RICTLY PROHIBITED. CONDUCTORS IN RSS CONDUIT CONNECTIONS TO COMMUNICATION CABINET AND VIBRATING EQUIPMENT SHALL CONSIST OF PULLED CONDUCTORS IN LIQUID TIGHT FLEXIBLE STEEL CONDUIT, MAXIMUM 6' IN LENGTH. metroPCS New York, L.L.C. 517E JOB#: N"'7515 MTM JOB#: 011MP575008 517E INFORMATION 4140 5 f;7-,' OI )7E: 25 SPECIAL_ EMPHASIS , CONCERNS , AND LIMITATIONS SYMBOLS FEI✓ONIr, , NY II �1S8 COMMUNICATION IDENTIFIERDE5CRIPTION IDENTIFIERD'ESCRIPTION DESIGN TYPE: 1. THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY OF A PROBLEM OR CONFLICT. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY SAFETY SWITCH RECEPTACLE IDENTIFY ONE OR MORE PROPOSED SOLUTIONS BUT SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL 50 AUTHORIZED. PANEL BOARDGOLOG?�T ION NEW UTILITY POLE LIMITATIONS ON DOWNTIME ® ELECTRIC METER EXISTING UTILITY POLE DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: I , COORDINATE ALL DISCONNECTIONS AND INTERRUPTIONS OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND GROUNDING SYSTEM WITH THE OWNER. A 50HEDULE OF INTERRUPTIONS AND SHUTDOWNS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL. THE SCHEDULE OF INTERRUPTIONS SHALL BE o--� ELEGTRIGAL WIRING RMe SSt 05/OSIOa SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER A MINIMUM OF TWO WEEK5 PRIOR To ANY ANTICIPATED INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE AND SHALL BE APPROVED (TURNING UP) BY THE OWNER BEFORE ANY INTERRUPTION 15 PERMITTED. SHEET TITLE ELECTRICAL WIRING (TURNING DOWN) ELE07F I C AL. NOTES CONTRACTORS cne COMMUNICATIONS CABINET SND NFORMA-TION I. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE AND PAY FOR ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND SHALL ARRANGEALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. 2, EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL GOORDINATE HI5 WORK WITH THE WORK OF ALL OTHER CONTRACTORS AND EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS. o BACKBOARD SHEET NUMBER REV. I j O KEY NOTES (Symbols �, �, Etc.) ��A OO I. EXISTING C50 CABINET. D E S I G Nu 8 O 2. EXISTING POLE TO MAKE TAP FROM EXISTING G R O U P z UTILITY POLE #251 TO NEW METRO PGS POLE A R C H I T E C T U R E IN COMPOUND. ENGINEERING 3. PROPOSED OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL. P. O. BOX 3 HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 4. PROP05FO UTILITY POLE. TEL: 7 3 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 210 5. PROVIDE NEW 200A BYPASS UTILITY FAX : 732 . 847 . 4335 APPROVED METER SOCKET MOUNTED ON Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. POLE. ARCHITECT STRUCTURALENGINEER NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 _ NY - # 028992-1 NY - # 075384 6. PROVIDE NEW 200A, 250V, NEMA 3 FUSED CT - # 22375 LOCKABLE DISCONNECT MOUNTED ON POLE. PA - # 061412 PROVIDE (2) 200A, 250V FUSES. -7. NEW FTG CABINET FOR ELECTRIC AND TELCO. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWIN65 FOR MOUNTING. 3 8. GROUND TO EXISTING TOWER GROUND. 11/20/09 ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMo 1. MASTER GROUND BAR. CONNECT 2#2 SOLID II/13/09 UPDATED PER WENTXWENT5 DGa PMo TINNED GROUND WIRES TO NEW GROUND RING. 05/31/09 155UED FOR G0N5TRXTION JEs PMo 10. PROVIDE NEW #2 SOLID TINNED COPPER Ao GROUND RING 18" BELOW GRADE. REVISION DRAWN CHKD. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY BY -- 11. PROVIDE 5/8"XIO' COPPER GROUND ROD - AND GAD WELD TO GROUND RING. SEAL 12. PROVIDE NEW TEST WELL FOR GROUND ROD. d - --� - ,� -- - 1 et, iX� #2 SOLID TINNED CONDUCTOR (TYP) TO BE 4,0 a CONNECTED TO P0575 AND OTHER METAL 2 05JEG75. � 14. PROPOSED TELCO AND ELECTRICAL \ CONDUITS ROUTED UNDERGROUND' THIS DOCUMENT 15 THE DESIGN, PROPERTY S COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND FOR THE EXCLU5IVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY 0 DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRE55 WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 5TRICTLY PROHIBITED. e , Alk I h J n metroPCS 2 New York, L.L.C. 3 4 5 6 14 '\ SITE JOB#: NY-7515 3 ' NOTE: CONDUIT ROUTING ON PLANS IS MTM JOB#: OIIMP575008 CONCEPTUAL, ACTUAL ROUTING TO BE BASED SITE INFORMATION ON FIELD CONDITIONS. 4140E5 F_-,lOIJTE= SITE PLAN WIRE AND GONDUIT LEGEND PEGONIG, NY Iq �B 1x1'7 SCALE: "=30'-O" 24x36 SCALE: DESCRIPTION WIRE CONDUIT FLOOD LIGHT WITH 500 WATT aUARTZ LAMP. LITHONIA MODEL # TOE 500 120 LPI 200 AMP FEEDER 3#3/0 # I#3G 2" DES16N TYPE: 0-4 HOUR MECHANICAL TIMER IN NEMA 3R GONDU I T(2) #12 #12G - 3/4" 100 AMP FEEDER 3#2 d #66 2" GOLOGATION ENCLOSURE TOR< # A504H OR EQUIVALENT. 50 AMP CIRCUIT 3#4 4 #8G 1-1/4" DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: 3#3/0 AWG, #45 - 2" CONDUIT TIMER 30 AMP GIRGUIT 2#10 * 1#105 3/4" RM 5St 05/08/01 4 5 6 3 #4 #56 - 1-1/41' 15 4 20 AMP CIRCUIT 2#12 $ 1#125 3/4" SHEET TITLE CONDUIT TELCO DEMARC TO SEE E-1 2" E=LE:GTRIG.d.L PLAN EGU I PMIENT UTILITY PTC BTS GROUND WIRE 1#4/0 2" POLE CABINET (ABOVE 6ROUND) SHEET NUMBER REV. 61ROUND WIRE 2#2 TINNED NONE 2 ONE LINE RISER SGHEMAT I G (BELOW GROUND) E Ixl7 SCALE: N.T.S. 24x36 SCALE: N.T.5. P I GENERAL NOTES A A I. WHERE ICE BRIDGES AND ICE SHIELDS ARE DESIGN z USED, BOND ALL POSTS VIA #2 SOLID TINNED G R O U P WIRE TO THE GROUND RING. ARC HITECTU RE 2. FOR NEW FENCE INSTALLATIONS BOND ALL ENGINEERING CORNER FENCE POSTS FROM GROUND RING TO A P. O. BOX "Y" TYPE GADWELD TO FENCE POST VIA CLAMP. COAX GROUND COAX GROUND HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 R KIT AT KIT AT (THOMAS 8 BETTS #2 OAPPROVED EQUAL) ANTENNA ANTENNA BOND ALL GATE F0575 AND GATE FRAMES WITH TEL: 7 3 2 . 8 8 8 . 6 210 A MINIMUM OF 1/0 COPPER FLEX AND ERIGO FAX : 7 3 2 . 8 4 7 . 4 3 3 5 FENCE GROUND A55EMBLIE5 OR APPROVED #6 GROUND KIT #6 GROUND KIT EQUAL, LOU Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 3. ALL COAXIAL GABLES SHALL BE GROUNDED TO NJ - # Al 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 A UNINSULATED GROUND BAR VIA GABLE NY - # 028992-1 NY - # 075384 GROUND KITS. NEWTON INSTRUMENT GOMPANY OR CT - # 22375 s EQUAL. THIS GROUND BAR SHALL BE LOCATED PA - # 061412 UNINSULATED JUST BELOW THE POINT WHERE ALL GABLES GROUND BAR COME TOGETHER AND DESCEND DOWN THE 2 TOWER. THIS GROUND BAR SHALL BE ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO THE TOWER VIA BEAM CLAMP. A 4. ALL COAXIAL GABLES LEAVING THE COMMUNICATION CABINET SHALL BE GROUNDED 2 11/20/09 ISSUED FOR FILING DGa PMo nJ TO A UNINSULATED GROUND BAR VIA GABLE �J GROUND KI75. NEWTON INSTRUMENT COMPANY All/15/O9 UPDATED PER 6LIENT60MMENT5 DGa PMo OR EQUAL. THIS GROUND BAR SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE POINT WHERE THE GABLES 08/51/09 1550 FOR GON5TRU6TION JEE, PMo COAX GABLE s 5 MAKE A NINETY DEGREE BEND OFF THE TOWER. Ac 5. 2#2 SOLID TINNED COPPER CONDUCTOR FROM REV. DATE REVISION DRAWN GHKD.DESCRIPTION BY BY (1) PER COAX CABL COAXKROUND 4C1 6 THE INSULATED GROUND BAR TO THE GROUND SEAL RING VIA ,rTYPE GADWELD. TEST WELLS. 65/8"3/8X10' GROUND ROD GADWELDED TO #2SOLID TINNED COPPER INSTALLED IN 5" PVGUNINSULATED ?. #2 AWG SOLID CONTINUOUS TINNED COPPERGROUND BAR WIRE EXTERIOR GROUNDRING TO BE PLACED 2'-O" AWAY FROM ALL FOUNDATIONS. SEE 2 JANTENNA OROUNDINO DETAIL SPEGIFIGA7ION5. i Ixl7 SCALE: NTS. 24x56 SCALE: N75. 8. 5/8"3/8, X 10' COPPER-GLAD STEEL GROUND ROD. THIS DOCUMENT 15 T E DE516N, PROPERTY a GOPYRI5HT OF THE MTM DE516N GROUP, INC." AND MORE THAN 2/5 OF THE ROD LENGTH MUST BE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT. ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN BELOW THE LOCAL FRO57 LINE. CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. EQUIPMENT SECTOR (I) PER COAX GABLE THREADED T CABINET GROUND BAR WELL COVE T p 2#2 SOLID = = 6„ PROVIDE Looe KEY NOTES (Symbols �, �, EtG.) me�rol FOR TESTING tATTAGHF-P TO EXI5TING FINISHED GRADE New York, L.L.C. 2#2 50LID - TOWER GROUND ANTENNA. (SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION, SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWIN55 FOR MOUNTING.) FVC -e" 51TE JOB#: N-7`7315 TTESTINGWELL INSPECTION ° Dia 2 -0' 2. MAST. MTM -105#:B#: OgMFST5005 ATTACHED To NEW 3. ANTENNA JUMPER. SITE INFORMATION GROUND RING 4. COAX GROUND KIT. DO NOT INSTALL ON BENDS. 41405 FOLD= � _✓ 6 5. GADWELD TYPE "V5" ROD 'GADWELD' FINISHED GROUND 5. G , NY G 5 8 TEST WELL 7e5T WELL 3 TEaT WELL DETAIL 6. ANTENNA COAXIAL GABLE. IIxl7 SCALE: NTS. 24x36 SCALE: N75. 7. TO COMMUNICATION CABINET. DESIGN TYKE: FINISH GRADE 5. 2 BARREL HYDRAULICALLY COMPRESSED GROUND ROD 30 20�NEGTION PANDUIT CATALOG # CTAP GOLOGATION Min. = q. #6 IN'ITE61RAL GROUND CONDUCTOR FROM DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: _ GROUNDING KIT TO 555. 3'-G" RMe SSt 05/08/Oq 10. #2 50LID TINNED COPPER GROUNDING GADWELD CONDUCTOR S" MINIMUM RADIUS. SHEET TITLE 10'-0" CONNECTION Min. 11. 2 BARREL HYDRAULICALLY COMPRESSED Fzl:�l O L) T-� D CONNECTION PANDUIT CATALOS # CTAP _ ASSUMED FROST LINE 2-40. C- TO BE VERIFIED) 12. TO NEXT ANTENNA. SHEET NUMBER REV. 1 15. TO MASTER GROUND BAR. 6ROUNDIN6 ONE LINE DIAGRAM 4 C-7ROUND ROD DETAIL 5 2 IIxl7 SCALE: NTS. 24x36 SCALE: NTS. IIxl7 SCALE: NTS. 24x36 5GALE: NTS. ALGA 12" APPROX. I-I/4" DIA. MAX. ANTENNA GABLE D E S I G N u GrR0LTPz WEATHERPROOFING KIT ANDREA #.221215 ARCHITECTURE PTC PANEL SCHEDULE ENGINEERING #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND P. O. BOX 3 WIRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) 200 AMP MAIN 24 GIRGUIT 120/240V HAZLET, NEW JERSEY 07730 (5TANDARD ANDREW GROUNDING KIT) 1 2 TEL: 732 . 888 . 6210 CONNECTION OF CABLE GROUND KIT SPARE 80 3 4 100 MODCELL POWER FAX : 7 3 2 . 8 4 7 . 4 3 3 5 TO GPs ANTENNA CABLE RECEPTACLE 15 5 6 20 LIGHT Lou Moglino, AIA Robert W. Toms, P.E. ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 7 8 SPACE NJ - # AI 13345 NJ - # GE 36209 ALGA ERRE AG UNIT S q 10 NY - # 028992-1 NY - # 075384 21/2"" DIA. 2" CT - # 22375 MAX. 6 SPACE 11 12 SPACE PA - # 061412 GPS ANTENNA ANTENNA (SUPPLIED BY LUCENT) GABLE SPACE 3 14 SPACE WEATHERPROOFING KIT / S 6 ANDREW #221213 GABLE GROUND KIT T22 SPACE SPACE A 11/20/01 155UED FOR FILING DGa PMC #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND WIRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) SPACE SPACE Aj 11/15/01 UPDATED PER6LIENTOMMENT5 DGa PMo (STANDARD ANDREW GROUNDING KIT) GABLE TO PIPE CONNECTOR MAIN GIRGUIT BREAKER RATING - 22,000 AIG 08/51/01155UEDFOR 60N5TRUCTION JE5 PMo BURNDY TYPE GAR NOTE: DO NOT INSTALL GABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND #2 AWG BCW (TYP 2 PLGS) AND ALWAYSDREVISION WN G DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN REV. ATE DRAHKD. (TYP 2 PLGS) TO GROUND BAR. DESCRIPTION BY BY SEAL r v y , 2 GONN�GTION O GAEL GROUND KIT 3 ATG PANEL SGHDUL a . IIxl7 SCALE: NTS. 24x36 SCALE: NTS. IIxl7 SCALE: N.T.S. 24x36 SCALE: N.T.S. THIS DOGUME T IS THE DESIGN, PROPERTY 4 �, I_ COPYRIGHT OF "THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC." AND KEYNOTES (Symbo J5 , O , Etc.) FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE BY THE TITLE CLIENT, ANY DUPLICATION OR USE WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN &ROUNDJNG KIT CONSENT OF THE CREATOR 15 57RICTLY PROHIBITED. I/2"5/5 COAX GABLE I. ALL COAXIAL GABLES LEAVING THE MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS PER COMMUNICATION CABINET SHALL BE MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD GROUNDED AT THIS POINT VIA GABLE metroPCS GIGBE #6 AWG GROUNDING KIT GROUND KITS. NEWTON INSTRUMENT COMPANY GROUND BAR GABLE (PROVIDED WITH KIT) OR EQUAL. #B-6142 (GROUND BAR 20" X 4" X New York L.L.C. #2 AWG BGW To MIGB 1/4"), #3061-4 (INSULATORS), #3015-8 (5/8" LOGKWASHER5), #A-6056 (WALL MOUNTING #2/0 STRANDED COPPER BR,AGKETS), AND #5012-1 (5/8"-11 X " H.H.G.S. NY-7515 CONDUCTOR BOLTS). SITE JOB#: MTM JOB#: OcI MFSTSOO5 FAN I 7 s 1 5 2. HYDRAULICALLY COMPRESSED LONG BARREL 517E INFORMATION 0 2-HOLE GROUNDING LUG FOR GROUNDING CONDUCTORS BETWEEN GABLE AND THE MASTER GROUND BAR TERMINAL. THOMAS ff 4140 ROIJT� � �✓ o ® o° o° °o ° ° ° 4 BETTS #54811BE OR EQUAL. o ® 8 o 8 o 8 o ° ° ° ° ° SECTOR SECTOR SECTOR ® ° ° ° 3. HYDRAULICALLY COMPRESSED LONG MAI 3 BARREL 2-HOLE GROUNDING LUG FOR THE 6ND ° 3 5 2 MAIN GROUNDING DOWN COINDUGTOR DESIGN TYPE: s BETWEEN THE MASTER GROUND BAR TERMINAL AND THE MAIN GROUNDING MAIN GROUNDING DOWN CONDUCTo . EL5C7RODE. THOMAS 0 BE775 #548625E GOLOGATION OR EQUAL. 4 5/8" STAINLESS STEEL DIAMETER BOLTS TO DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: CONNECT GROUNDING LUG TO THE GROUND RMe SSt 05/08/09 BAR (TYPICAL). 5• 3/8" STAINLESS STEEL DIAMETER FLAT SHEET TITLE WASHER (TYPICAL). 6 3/8"' STAINLESS STEEL DIAMETER LOCK WASHER (TYPICAL). T 3/8` HEX HEAD STAINLESS STEEL NUT SHEET NUMBER REV. (TYP I GAL). CDPS ANTENNA GROUNDINS DF-TAIL 5 MASTER GROUND BAR TERMINATION AIL 8. PROVIDE LOCKTITE THREAD LOCKER RED TO � _ � a2 PREVENT THEFT. Ilxl"1 SCALE: NTS. 24x36 SCALE: NTS. Ilxl'T SCALE: NTS. I .24x5e, SCALE: NTS. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION B-1 SOIL GRk '!PS TYPICAL NAMES AND SOIL SYMBOLS GVV WELL GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES (EL. 99.70') GROUND SURFACE ;n POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES. 1 BRN, SAND,TR. _ _— __ __ _ __ ____ __ __ �' - -_ —_ _—__ — GP. LITTLE OR NO FINES p,ia GRAVEL, LITTLE SILTS (SP)(FILL) I GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND- SILT MIXTURE (HAND AUGERED) LT. BRN AND,TR. I CHAIN-LINK FENCE GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURE b" GRAVEL,SILT '� 5 (SP) I SW WELL GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES 0 0 0 (HAND AUGERED) 1 1116 LT.BRN./ORANGE SAND, • • • I SP POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES • 117,4TR. GRAVEL, SILT • • • 20 (SP)(3a) • • • SM SILTY SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTURES 0 0 I • • : I SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES o 0 • I / / 1 (D O ML INORGANIC SILTS,VERY FINE SANDS, CLAYEY SILTS, SLIGHT PLASTICITY 1 TAN/LT. BRN.SAND,TR. • • INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS 4 5 GRAVEL • a • i // 1 Z Z 2 5 6 (SP)(3b) • • • I / I (Xn _j CL SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS • • • EXISTING // 1 W m OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY I I ANTENNA • • G.W.T. I BUILDING < 1 INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR • • • _14'-4" 1 1 MH SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS 1 15 BRN.SAND,TR. • •• — — CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS 3 GRAVEL, SILT • • • g 6 6 (SP)(3b) • • • OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS • I PC PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS • • I ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURES, N.Y.C. BLDG. CODE TABLE 1804.1 • • • 20 BRN.SAND,TR. • • • I CLASS OF MATERIALS MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GRAVEL, SILT 11 (S • • • I (Norse 1&9) FOUNDATION PRESSURE FOUNDATION PRESSURE 4 12P)(3a) • I (TSF) (kPa) • • t. BEDROCK(NOTES 287) 14 • • • I is HARD"OUND ROCK-GNEISS, DIABASE,SCHIST 60 5,746 • CHAIN-LINK FENCE 1b MEDIL;,HARD ROCK-MARBLE,SERPENTINE40 3,830 is INTERVDIATE ROCK-SHALE,SANDSTONE 20 1,915 • • • id SOFT F 7CK-WEATHERED ROCK 8 766 • BRN. SAND,TR • • I, 2 SANDY GP0.VEL&GRAVEL(GW,GP)(NOTES 3,4,8,&9) 25 GRAVEL, SILT • • • I 2a DENSE 10 958 7 (SP)(3b) • • • 1 2b MEDIUM 6 575 5 7 8 • 3. GRANULAR SOILS(GC,GM,SW,SP,SM,&SCKNOTES 4,5,B,8 9) • • 3b MEDIUM 3 287 3a DENSE 6 575 END OF BORING 2T - 0" 4. CLAYS(SC,CL,&CH)(NOTES 4,6,8,&9) W I I 4a HARD 5 479 Iwi NO SB CLASSIFICATION 1 , 4b STIFF 3 287 I 4c MEDIUM 2 192 5. SILTS B SILTY SOILS IML B MH)(NOTES 4,8,89) 5a DENSE 3 287 I EXISTING 5b MEDIUM 1.5 1 144 fi ORGANIC SILTS,ORGANIC CLAYS,PESTS,SOFT CLAYS, BUILDING LOOSE GRANULAR SOILS,&VARVEO SILTS SEE 1804.2.1 SEE 18042.1 7 CONTROLLED&UNCONTROLLED FILLS SEEM04.2.20R1B(342.3 I SEE 180422 OR 1804.2.3 COMPACTION RELATED TO SPOON BLOWS PER FOOT SAND SILT & CLAY LOOSE 15 OR LESS SOFT 10 OR LESS SAND MEDIUM 16 TO 39 MEDIUM 11 TO 29 I PILE DENSE 40 OR MORE HARD 30 OR MORE " N " STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (2"SPOON, 140Ib HAMMER,30"FALL) I e e N=1' BLOWS SPOON BLOW COUNT IS GENERALLY SHOWN IN 6" INCREMENTS FOR 2' DRIVE PEP FOOT TO OBTAIN BLOWS PER FOOT(N) USE THE 2ND&3RD 6"INCREMENT I' ROTARY CASING EXTRA HEAVY CASING SAMPLE SPOON SIZES, INCHES 2.5 2.0 EXISTING HAMMER WEIGHT, POUNDS 140 BUILDING HAMMER FALL, INCHES 30 I CB - CASING BLOWSPER 1 FOOT DRIVE UD - UNDISTURBED SOIL SAMPLE SB - SPOON BLOWS PER 61NCH DRIVE NO - SAMPLE NUMBER P - PUShZD BY WEIGHT OF HAMMER FEET - DEPTH FROM GND. SUR NOTED AT EACH 5' THE LIABILITY OF SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP,ITS OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES,FOR ERRORS,OMISSIONS OR NEGLIGI 'CE RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURIES,PROPERTY DAMAGE OR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, IS LIMITEDTO' 1E AMOUNT OF THE FEE PAID FOR THIS REPORT.THE RETENTION OR USE OF ANY PART OF THIS REPORT WILL CONST'TUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF THIS LIMITED LIABILITY IF THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE,THE CLIENT MUST NOTIFY SOI'. 'J ECHANICS DRILLING CORP.IN WRITING BY CERTIFIED MAIL,WITHIN SEVEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF BM 5 RECEIPT THE FEE CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT IS BASED ON THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY WHICH IS THE ES- SENCE OF THIS AGREEMENT.IF THE CLIENT WANTS A HIGHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY,SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CHAIN-LINK FENCE CORP.,WILL NEGOTIATE ONE,BASED UPON A HIGHER FEE BEING CHARGED FOR THE ADDITIONAL ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITY.SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP., ITS OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES,HAVE NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBIL- ITY TO PERSONS OTHER THAN THE CLIENT FOR WHOM THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED. ANYONE,OTHER THAN OUR CLIENT, RELIES ON THIS REPORT AT THEIR OWN RISK. I K.M. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. 1 #32 WEST UPPER FERRY ROAD, EWING, NEW JERSEY 0862B SEP I ) 0 20I0 BORING LOCATION PLAN SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. 11 SCALE : 1"=20'4" I subsoil investigations 3770 MERRICK ROAD * SEAFORD, NEW YORK 11783 * 516 - 221-2333 NOTES 1. -SOIL DESCRIPTIONS ARE BY VISUAL EXAMINATION OF SOIL SAMPLES RECOVERED DURING DRILLING OPERATIONS. d p SOUTHOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT - 41405 MAIN ROAD (N.Y.S. ROUTE 25) �D 2. -SOIL DESCRIPTIONS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATIO14 SYSTEM. 4 -SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION - 3. -GROUNDWATER WAS MEASURED INSIDE THE DRILL CASING AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH BOREHOLE, PECONIC, NEW YORK 4 -SOIL STRATIFICATIONS ARE ACCURATE TO WITHIN TWO FEET VERTICALLY. 5. -ELEVATIONS WERE REFERENCED TO B.M. -ON CONCRETE STEPS AT BUILDING ENTRANCE.ASSUMED ELEVATION AT 100.0' VERTICAL BORING SCALE: DRAWING GATE DRAWING NUMBER 6. -SOIL SAMPLES WERE OBTAINED USING A CENTRAL MINE EQUIPMENT(CME)AUTOMATIC TRIP HAMMER. 114"=1'-0' JANUARY22 2010 10R040-1 DATES OF BORING DWN.BY: CKO.BY: JANUARY 21,2010 JMR CV SHEET 1 OF 1. * A$ : 'I:HE.FO M - Planning Board,Site Flans and Arne Site Plans uz_ SPF `Ckms, Awroved Prowt, Plant Sta us: ,, C !M * :' i000 - 75.-5.14;j PLOiWam. Metr ns Hyt ug at e2ft Ston' � � '�. k Lane 'Pectic Ha— �-' ♦; is ADdl MAW MME cs New York. LLC Owner Natrie: T*rn of Southold ' Zone t R=80 Appr bft: 11/15/2010; - ©P'1''MIM # L lNF 1 A"ON A dab kdCdtn"Vii h6ft ftO*411M fi6W'Ml�tl End SP:.QW: 11/17, 010 Zone Zone 3; Loca SC Fft Dote: a 's ; Home&W: R and M Agfie ent: SCANNED FEB 27 2011 SCAN,Q51tet Records Management