Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-107.-10-10.1 MELISSA A. SPIRO LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR melissa.spiro @ town.southold.ny.us Telephone (631 ) 765-5711 Facsimile (631 ) 765-6640 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex (corner of5~3a~5n i~t::; ~°~t:u~5gs Avenu~/ Southold, New York MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 14, 2011 6900Wickham Avenue, LLC Richard Girards&Carol Girards 6900Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: 6900 WICKHAM AVENUE, LLC to TOWN OF 5OUTHOLD Part of SCTM #1000-107.-10-10.1 +8.26 acre development rights easement Premises: 6900 Wickham Avenue Mattituck Dear Mr. & Mrs. Girards: Enclosed please find the property survey revised date March 11, 2011. The survey was revised to reflect the changes to the Reserve Area you requested. The Reserve Area is 80,000 sq. ft. (1.84 acres) and the Easement Area is 8.2639 acres. The Land Preservation Committee has reviewed and approved the changes to the Reserve Area boundary. As we've discussed, the Reserve Area was designed to meet your needs, and was not designed to conform to the Bulk Schedule for the Agricultural-Conservation (A-C) Zoning District. The 80,000 sq. ft. Reserve Area meets the minimum lot size area; however, the boundary line of the Reserve Area, which transverses existing greenhouse(s) and lies very close to existing buildings, does not allow for the A-C building setbacks. This does not impact the sale of development rights; however, should you or a future owner wish to apply to the Planning Board to subdivide the Reserve Area from the Easement Area, the Planning Board will require that all requirements of the A-C Zoning District are met. Again, meeting the Bulk Schedule is not an issue for the current sale of a Development Rights Easement, and as you know, we are in the process of scheduling a closing date before the end of March. Please confirm that the revised building envelope is satisfactory. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Land Preservation Coordinator enc.: survey cc: Planning  GREENHOUSE__ S$4'59'40"£ GREENHOUSE GREENHOUSE 333. 92' N34'59 METAL ~ BLDG. 62' 297,66' 121.42 455.34' I 209' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN II. SIDOR Choir WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 December 15, 2010 Mr. Richard Girards 6900 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. Girards: We received your letter indicating your withdrawal of your subdivision application for tax parcel 1000-107-10-10.1. Enclosed is a check for $2,300 which the Planning Board has agreed to refund to you. Sincerely, Planning Director Enc. Southold Town ~,q Board -Work Session - 12/6 Two Project name Ioannou, Constantine ................ Location: 0'r~'the north side of S~;~ ~0~d ~i ~'i'§4~§"~ ~)~) ~'i~igh's Court, in East Marion ................ 5~i~{i~ ~'~i~ ~'~ ~{~"~i~i~i~"i~ f0'~'~ i~{~'bn 6 81 acres where Lot 1 = 92,332 sq. ff., Lot 2 = 124,679 sq. ff., inclusive of the 25 wide right- Status: ............ Le er. ......................................... ,project n~me ........... Neum~.n.n,.james ............. SCTM#.; ...... 1000-107-1:! ~! ~(~;~1:~.:~ I_ocationI Mattituck Creek and Mi Road Matt tuck Description: ~'i~ Prop0'~i i~ ~'~'~'~t~ ~'"~Ji'~"~ ............ igne ex ~.ng hgus.e.bo.~de[i.ng Mattituck Creek ir~ t.!~e R:80.Z0rt.e: ; Status: [ODen Act on App cant's agent to address Panning Board. [ Attachments: i None ............................. L0ca.~. 0n ................... Pecg~...q._B~y Bou. lev~a[d...~attjtuc.k .............................. Description: This proposed lot line change will transfer 3,887 s.f. (the flagpole) of SCTM#1000-45-2-17.1 to SCTM#1000-145-2-17.2. Lot 17.1 will decrease from 30,235 s.f. to 26,348 s.f., and Lot 17.2 will increase from .22,457 s.f. to 26,344 s.f. An area variance from the ZBA was granted in i 2006 for Lot 17 1 to become more non-conforming in the R-40 Zone. Status: Open Act on i..Acc~pt apP!!ca~.~ ~re~W.~ A~achments; S~aff RePo~ Project name: Flora Nurser,eslG~rards SCTM#: 107-10-10.1 Locat on ~ 6900 W ckham Ave Mathtuck Status: i Withdrawn i~ Action: i Consider returning fees paid. 'Attachments: i Discussion: 1. Heritage at Cutchogue proper~y - results of site visit Friday. 2. 2011 Planning Board Schedule for work sessions and public meetings - draft 3. Southold Town Planning Board Applications - 2010 Third Quarter Report Page 1 of 2 Kalin, Carol From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 3:39 PM To: Sadoo, Tamara; Kalin, Carol Subject: FW: Refund of Subdivision Application fee Please print this for the file. From: RGirards [mailto:rgirards@aol.com] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 2:18 PM To: Lanza, Heather Subject: Re: Refund of Subdivision Application fee Dear Heather, As we decided to pursue the sale of development rights to the Town of Southold, we hereby withdraw our application for the subdivision of our farm at 6900 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck. Please accept our request for a refund of the subdivision application fee. Sincerely, Richard Girards In a message dated 11/29/10 11:46:17 Eastern Standard Time, heather.lanza~town.southold.ny.us writes: Dear Mr. Girards, This is just a reminder of our conversation today regarding the procedure for the refund of your subdivision application fee paid in 2009. Please respond stating that you are withdrawing your application and requesting a refund of the fee. The Planning Board did spend some time reviewing your application, so a nominal amount may be deducted from the refund to account for that time. Thank you. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza~town.southold.ny.us 12/8/2010 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAII,ING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 October 15, 2010 Mr. Richard Girards 6900 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 <Hand Delivered> Re: Flora Nurseries. Tax Map # 1000- 107-10-10.1 Land Preservation & Planning Applications Dear Mr. Girard: As we discussed by telephone yesterday, the Town is prepared to expedite your application for a conservation subdivision/Open Development Area (ODA). Because the Town Board must act by this Tuesday on the public hearing recently held for the purchase of your development rights, we need your written confirmation of your intention to proceed with a revised course of action by the end of the day on Monday, October 18, 2010. Your signature on this letter will suffice for the written confirmation. For your convenience, we have enclosed two copies of this packet. Please complete the following: 1. Sign this letter at the bottom of page 2. 2. Initial each attached page acknowledging you have received and reviewed them. 3. Return the original to either the Planning or Land Preservation Department by 3:45pm this Monday. Upon receiving approval by the Town Board and Planning Board, this action will result in your being able to split the property into three lots - two for residential development with single family residences, and one for agricultural uses. It will also result in the Town purchasing development rights and holding an easement over a portion of the property, which will restrict future subdivision and development in that area. In a preliminary review of the numbers, we estimate that you will be able to sell the development rights to approximately 6.43 acres. The actual number is subject to review of your revised plans. Per our discussions this week, the purchase price of those acres remains to be determined. PRESERVATION For your information, we included in this packet the following documents: 1. Overview of the basic steps of the overall process 2. Detailed description of the Planning subdivision process 3. Detailed description 0f the Land Preservation sale of development rights process 4. A chart showing the conservation subdivision calculations Please call me or Melissa Spiro with any questions. We are here to help you get through the application process. Heather Lanza Planning Di~ctor Land Preservation Coordinator cc: Planning Board Land Preservation Committee I, Richard Girards, imend to revise the Flora Nurseries standard subdivision application submitted to the Southold Planning Board on October 29, 2007 to an 80/60 conservation subdivision/Open Development Area (ODA). I understand this will require me to submit revised plans prepared &stamped by a licensed engineer, as well as following through on all the requirements in the Town Code for completing a Sketch Plan and ODA. I also intend to revise my application to the Land Preservation Committee to reflect the new area that will result from the conservation subdivision/ODA process. 2 Flora Nurseries. Overview of immediate actions & summary of process (more detail on following pages) 1. Submit a letter to Land Preservation & Planning Dept. by 3:45pm, Mpnd..ay, Ogto!~e.r ! 8th stating the following: a. You will revise your subdivision application to an 80/60 conservation subdivision b. You are revising the area being offered for sale of development rights. **For your convenience - you may sign the cover letter of this packet in the space provided on the second page and return the original to us. 2. Submit new plan (9 copies) to Planning Dept. · showing the 3 lots (2 house lots and farm lot) (stamped by licensed engineer) (see attached for additional plan requirements) 3. Planning steps*: a. Review the revised application b. Public Hearing c. Resolution approving Sketch Plan 4. Town Board steps*: a. Review petition for ODA b. Public Heating on ODA c. Resolution approving ODA 5. Land Preservation steps (concurrent with above steps)*: a. Review revised plan b. Review offer c. Revise contract d. Public Hearing on the PDR (Town Board hearing) e. Survey, title, ESA- closing steps f. Closing 6. Mr. Girards - file the ODA map with County Clerk Please note: The above is a s!mplified overview - see attached for the complete process. Initial SOUTHO D PLANNING DE?AI MENT Open Development Area (ODA) Conservation Subdivision for Flora Nurseries parcel The ODA process occurs in three phases in the Planning Department. Phase I. Sketch Plan Approval 1. Submit 9 copies of the plan (done by a licensed engineer or architect) showing the following: a. Title: Sketch plan Flora Nurseries b. Proposed lot lines of the three lots to be created c. A table showing the area of each lot in square feet. d. All existing structures and their footprints in s.f. as well as their distance to property lines (distances needed only if less than the minimum setback required by town code). e. Calculations demonstrating the 80/60 Conservation Subdivision is met: i. Total lot area (s.f.) x 80% = Land preserved for Agriculture ii. Area lei~ for residential development = Total lot area - Land Preserved for Agriculture iii. f. A calculation for the two residential lots as follows: i. Min. lot size (80,000 s.f.) - Proposed lot size = Subdivision Open Space. ii. Note the total s.f. of the Subdivision Open Space on the plan g. Show the location and size of the subdivision open space by using a dashed line around the total area that will remain open and free of structures (approximately 72,000 s.f.) 2. Subdivision Application Form for Sketch Plan Approval (we will see if the application forms we have in the office already will suffice and help revise them if necessary) 3. Revise other necessary forms-EAF, LWRP -Planning staffcan likely do this · without your help. Your letter to us and the plans you submit should suffice. 4. Planning Board work session to accept the application and begin review 5. Planning Board refers the plan out for comments from Town Engineer. 6. Planning Board work session to review any comments, planning staffreport and move to next step 7. Planning Board sets public hearing. 8. Public Hearing for Sketch Plan a. A public hearing will require that you send certified mail to neighbors to notify them of the hearing date and project details. b. You will have to pick up a sign that planning will make for you to put on the street in front of your property at 1cast 10 days prior to thc public hearing. 9. Sketch Plan Approval resolution from Planning Board, to include reference to the creation of an ODA. Initial.~. 2 Immediately following the public hearing, if no issues were raised by the public that provided new information the Planning Board had not previously considered, a resolution granting Sketch Approval will be voted upon. Phase 2. Establish the Open Development Area 1. Submit Open Development Area petition to the Town Clerk- you can do this at the same time or shortly after you submit your plans to the Planning Dept. 2. Submit ODA maps to the Town Clerk for Town Board approval. a. These are the maps you will file and will differ slightly from the Sketch Plan map submitted to Planning Board. In this case, mostly the title will change because there aren't any internal lot lines as the Open Development Area is split and each area is only one lot. 3. Map requirements: a. Three mylar and six paper copies of the map b. Scale 1"=100' c. Include all of the information required pursuant to Sketch Plan Review d. Include the notation requirements pursuant to Final Plat Review e. The ODA map should be clearly labeled "Open Development Area" f. Remove internal lot lines (may not be any in this case due to the configuration of the lots). 4. An executed agreement permanently preserving a minimum of 75% of the property from development. This agreement shall be between the property owner and one of the following entities: the Town of Southold, the County of Suffolk, another governmental entity, or a private conservation corporation or land trust as approved by the Town Board. 5. SEQRA - this review is done by Planning Staffand is quick. 6. Town Board public heating on the ODA 7. Approval by the Town Board by resolution after the public hearing 8. File the approved ODA maps as follows: a. ~hree Mylar maps filed by applicant with the County Clerk as a miscellaneous map within 62 days of approval. b. Three paper copies to Town Clerk (one returned to applicant, one kept by the Clerk, one sent to Planning for their records) 9. Approval expires after 62 days Important: At this stage the lots are not actually created as building lots. Instead, by filing a miscellaneous map to create the ODA, the following is established: · The right to a future subdivision with the number of lots approved in the Sketch Plan, regardless of any future zone changes. · The right to continue with the subdivision process at some point in the future - at the convenience of the landowner. Initi ,a~. SOUTHO I ) PLANNING DEPAR I VIENT Phase 3. Create the buildin~ lots This can happen at any time you choose. The ODA protects your right to create the lots at any tim~e in the fu, ture. 1. Petition the Planning Board to implement the ODA. This phase is very similar to the Final Plat Approval stage for conservation subdivisions. 2. Submit the following with the petition: a. Twelve paper copies of the ODA with Heath Department approval, showing the location and dimensions of the proposed lots in accordance with the approved ODA map. b. Five paper copies of preliminary road and drainage plans. c. Fee d. Dnffi bond estimate 3. Planning Board, Town Engineering Office to review the plans & bond estimate. 4. SEQP 5. Public Hearing by the Planning Board 6. Final Subdivision Approval resolution by the Planning Board. 7. File the subdivision map with the County Clerk (follow same procedure as for Final Plat Approval). Please note: This sununm~ is provided as a quick-reference guide. Refer to Town Code Article VIII Open Development Area for more details. Initia~ 4 Land Preservation Procedure Prepared by Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator October 15, 2010 1) Land Preservation Committee will review the revised application at the October 26, 2010 LPC meeting. LPC to review: i) Change in proposal from one 2 acre Reserve Area around existing dwelling to proposed Conservation Subdivision. If LPC has concerns re: proposed Conservation Subdivision, meetings with Planning and/or Town Board will be scheduled. ii) Appraisal for odginal project and whether or not new appraisal necessary. If LPC determines that new appraisal necessary, new appraisal, or appraisal update letter will be requested from appraiser. iii) Purchase offer for original project and whether or not new purchase offer necessary. If LPC determines that new appraisal not necessary, but new purchase offer is warranted, new purchase offer will be determined. 2) When Number 2 above concluded, new offer letter outlining Easement Area and purchase price (whether the same or revised) will be presented to landowner for signature. Per acre purchase price will be for the Easement Area which is not considered Subdivision Open Space area. Easement area excluding Subdivision Open Space area is estimated at 6.43 acres (subject to survey.) 3) When signature received, LPC's attorney will be directed to prepare new contracts to reflect: a) Revised Easement and Reserve Areas; b) Revised purchase price, if applicable; Land P~q~ation Procedure Page 1 of 2 Initial//t._~ c) Conservation Subdivision description and contingency; Timeframe for contract preparation is estimated at 1 week. 4) Contracts will be sent to landowner or his designated attorney for signature. When signed contracts are returned by landowner, Town Board will advertised public hearing. Timeframe is dependant on landowner review and return of contract. Two Town Board meetings are necessary to schedule and hold public hearing. 5) After Town Board public hearing concluded, Land Preservation Department will order: a) Survey i) Survey will be ordered from same firm Girards chooses for Conservation Subdivision. Surveyor will be asked to show all improvements within Easement Area. If lot coverage exceeds that allowed by Town Code (20%) landowner will need to reduce coverage to 20% or obtain Zoning Board of Appeals approval for lot coverage. b) Environmental Site Assessment for Easement area. c) Title Timeframe to complete 5a, 5b and 5c, assuming ZBA approval is not required, there are no environmental concerns found and there are no title issues, is estimated at 4-6 weeks. 6) When Survey/Environmental/Title satisfied and Planning Board approval obtained, Town will be in position to close. Landowner can decide whether or not he wishes to hold closing until such time that Town Board grants final ODA approval. Land Pre~,~.ation Procedure Page 2 of 2 Initial ? Con vation Subdivision Anal is 1 2 3 4 Parcel Data Unbuildable Buildable Total Name Tax Map # (s)Lands Lands Acreage Flora Nurserfe~ ~& ~;~ 10.10 ~ ~ ~ ...... ] 0.00 ~:!; ~ ~ .~.~ i 0.00 o,00 Total Yield Calculation (bulldable landdS0,000 a.f. per lot-4 lots) I 0.00 0.00 0.00 75/75 Conservation subdivision Calculations Preserved Land (75% bulldable lands) Development Area (25% buiidable lands) 7.58 2.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75% Reduced Density calculation # Lots I 1.37 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 80160 Conservation Subdivision Calculations 1 2 3 4 Preserved Land (so% Development Area bulldable lands) (20% bulldable lands) , 8.08 [ 2.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 60% Reduced Density calculation # Lots 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 Proposed Plan (enter numbers from the plane submitted with application to compare with above) # Lots proposed Development Total area minus the Development lot area* (roads, Area (Lots + flags, one/) mad) (acres) (acres) Preserved Buildable Land {acres) Land area of Development Subdiv. Rights Open Purchase Space** (s.f.) (acres) 72,009 0 0 0 Note: These numbers are for discussion purposes only. Final numbers may change depending on the conservation subdivision sketch plan that has not yet been submitted. * this number is needed to calculate the Subdivision Open Space, which is the amount of land that must be set aside from a purchase of development rights as ineligible for purchase. ** Subdivision Open Space is calculated by subtracting the actual number of acres in each lot minus any dghts of way or flags from the amount required by the zoning district. Page 1 of I Sadoo, Tamara From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 4:09 PM To: Martin Sidor Cc: Terry, Mark; Sadoo, Tamara; Spiro, Melissa Subject: Girards Martin, Mr. Girard called today to tell me he has decided to go with the Conservation Subdivision concept. Melissa and I spoke at length with him on a conference call to review the process. I told him that we could revise his existing subdivision application for him into a conservation subdivision application, and he may even be due some fees back since he paid for sketch, prelim and final in 2008 and never proceeded past the initial review. I also said he will need official maps to file with us and eventually with the County Clerk, and that we would be happy to meet with his surveyor to tell him what needs to be on the map (to save the back and forth which is typical, time-consuming and costly to the applicant). I explained the ODA process again, and he said he prefers to go that route - it saves him money and time. He said he wants the ability to have that other lot, but doesn't need to have it right away. The ODA will happen the quickest. He won't have to go to the ZBA for lot coverage because he isn't actually creating the lots now. Instead, he is preserving his ability to create the lots when he chooses to do so, which will then require he get SC Health Dept approval and at that time will have to deal with lot coverage issues. We'll put some sort of caveat on the Sketch Plan to that effect. Melissa says the typical process is for Land Preservation Committee to review the new proposal and determine whether new appraisals are necessary. She said also that a new public hearing on the purchase of development rights will have to be held because the plan is different now. I am preparing an overview to fax to Rich today or tomorrow so he understands the process, what we need him to do next, and the outline of the numbers for and 80/60 conservation subdivision, including the concept of subdivision open space which reduces the amount of development rights he is paid for by the Town. I also spoke to Scott R today to let him know Mr. Girard had contacted me with his decision. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: healher, lanza(a_),town.southold.n¥.us 10/14/2010 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H~ SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING.ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 September 12, 2008 Mr. and Mrs. Girards 6900 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re~ Standard Subdivision of Flora Nurseries/Girards The property is located at 6900 Wickham Avenue in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-107-10-10.1 Zoning District: AC Dear Mr. and Mrs. Girards, This letter is to inform you that the Planning Board, at their August 25th, 2008 Work Session reviewed your application for a standard sub-division of the above referenced property. After careful consideration of your application, the Planning Board has deemed your application incomplete for the following reasons: The application is incomplete as per Town Code §240-6(B): "no appfication for a review or approval under this chapter shall be deemed to be complete unless...the app#cation complies with the provisions of this chapter, the Town code, and all other app#cable requirements" The following is a list of reasons as to why this application is incomplete pursuant to the above mentioned clause: 1) The submitted plan is not in keeping with the intent and purpose of a cluster development: Town Code ARTICLE XI, Cluster Development § 240-42. Authority and purpose. A. Authority is hereby granted to the Planning Beard pursuant to New York State Town Law § 278 to modify applicable provisions of Chapter 280, Zoning, of this Code, as to layout, configuration and design of lots, buildings and structures, roads, utility lines and other infrastructure, parks and landscaping, to enable and encourage flexibility of design and development of land in such manner as to preserve the natural and scenic qualities of open space lands. Any subdivision designed under this article shall indicate on the final plat that it is a cluster subdivision. The proposed open space on Lot 4 does not preserve the natural and scenic qualities of open space land. · Placing green houses on top of the land does not conform with preserving the natural qualities of the land. Instead, having structures on the open space disguises and alters the natural state of the land. · While the proposed open space, LOT 4, does meet the 60% requirement for open space on a clustered parcel as it is 6.38 acres out of a 10.1 acre total parcel size (see Town Code §240-42(H)(1)), it does not conform to the maximum coverage allowed as per the Bulk Schedule of 20% in an AC zone(Town Code §280, Attachment 3). 2) The property to the South and East of the parcel is owned and preserved by Suffolk County. Allowing three residential lots to be built would detract greatly from the open space view-shed and the scenic qualities of the open space land. · If buffers are planted to shield the residential lots from the green house operations, the view-shed would further be diminished: Town Code §240-43(G): "Views of house lots from exterior roads and abutting properties shall be minimized by the use of natural or landscaped buffers,.., or additional landscaping in accordance with this chapter or other provisions of the Code." If buffers are planted around the green houses/open space, air flow through and across the greenhouses would be hampered and could possibly cause problems for the green houses. 3) A retail space is proposed on the open space. Town Code §280-13(A)(2)(a) only allows the "seasonal sale of products grown on the premises", 75% of what is grown in the greenhouses is tomatoes. These can therefore be sold all- year long. Therefore, seasonal sales would be difficult to enforce. From your application, it is unclear what you are proposing to sell at this proposed retail space on the open space. 4) The proposed setbacks are not in conformance with Town Code §240- 43(F)(1 )(a)(b)and (c): Town Code §240-43(F) House Lot Standards (1): The buildable area of all proposed lots shall meet the following setback requirements to the greatest extent practicable: a. From all external road rights-of-ways, including NY$ designated scenic by-ways ($.R. 25 and C.R. 48): 100 feet b. From ali other tract boundaries: 50 feet c. From agricultural/ands, either bordering or within the tract: 50 feet. 5) From the aerial it appears as if there is a natural drainage swale on the south- western portion of the property where residential Lot 3 is proposed. This is not in conformance with {240-43 (A). If a natural drainage swale is verified it should be part of the open space, not a proposed residential lot. Town Code §240-43(A): The required open space land shall consist of a combination of primary conservation areas and secondary conservation areas as defined in 240-3.... The proposed design shaft strictly minimize disturbance of these environmentally sensitive areas. The applicant shall demonstrate that such features will be protected by the proposed subdivision plan. 6) Your proposed application is also creating two flag lots: proposed lots 2 and 3. While ".... the Planning Board may permit a limited number of flag lots in a residential subdivision plat...[the lots must be] well shaped, [and] generally larger than usual lots." Article XII Design Standards, {240-45(D), these proposed lots are not in conformance with Town Code {240-45 (D)(1): Town Code §240-45 (D)(1) To assure that the flag lot is of adequate size and shape, a flag lot located within the residential zones shaft contain at least the minimum lot area of the applicable zoning district within which it is situated, within the bulk of the lot exclusive of the area contained in the flag pole access strip. Proposed Lots 2 and 3 are flag lots and they are each 1.16 an 1.17 acres, almost a half size smaller than the AC zoned minimum lot size of 2 acres. 7) Your application is further proposing a 16' asphalt driveway, not stone blend. The ROW to all 3 lots must be 25' feet wide as per Town Code {161-15 Construction Specifications, and it does not appear to be so. Further, the proposed driveway, at the terminus has no turnaround as required by Town Code {240-45(5)(c) - Design Standards, Cul-de-sac streets: Town Code §240-45(5)(c) All residential cul-de-sac shall have a turn-around at the end of the street which shall have a right-of-way radius of 50 feet. The curb at the turn shall have a minimum radius of 44 feet. 8) Your application does not indicate or propose who will take ownership of the open space as required by Town Code {240-44: The lot coverage of the proposed open space exceeds the coverage requirements in Chapter 280, Zoning of the Town Code. This does not conform to Town Code §240-44(D) Restrictions On Use, requiring that use of open space shall be restricted and defined in a conservation easement and limited to: §240-44(D)(2) "...agricultural and horticultural uses...that are specifically needed to support an active, viable agricultural or horticultural operation, subject to applicable lot requirements in chapter 280, Zoning...' Town Code §240-43(C) states that "Active agricultural land with farm/agricultural support buildings may be used to meet the minimum required open space lands", but it is within the Planning Board's discretion to not allow certain farm/agricultural support buildings as explicitly made clear by the term "may" above. In this instance, greenhouses can be considered "agricultural support" buildings, however, when those support buildings cover a majority of the proposed open space, the intent of the above referenced clause, as well as, the definition and intent of "open space" are not met. According to Town Code §240-43(D) "Open space lands should generally remain undivided..." The lands bordering this property to the south and east are preserved Suffolk County farmlands. Creating "open space" covered with greenhouses would fragment the open space, viewshed and continuity of the open space in that area. Retaining the area where the residential lots are proposed would be more in conformance with keeping the open space contiguous. 9) Lastly, the map submitted should have solid lines between the properties for a subdivision. Instead, dotted lines are used, and, the topography of the proposed project needs to be indicated on the map. If you have any questions about this determination and your application, please do not hesitate to contact this office, Very Truly Yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold Town I~nnin~ Board Work Session - Pa~l'wo - 912/08 j_~9_c__at!.o..p.; ............ !. 6.9(~0 ..Wickham Avenue, Mattituck Description: i Proposal is to subdivide a 10.10 acre improved parcel into 4 lots. Zone: i""s~"a'[~': '! Sketch Approval Stage Recommendat ons: i application incomplete - see reasons listed on Staff Re~ort Lot Line Change Location: ' The properties are located on the south side of Avenue B, approximately .......................... ]~20 ~e~ west of ~[~ceEt Average ?. ~i~hers !~!~[~: Description: ~ This proposal is to reconfigure the lot lines of four parcels where SCTM#1000-6-2-16 will be merged and, following the reconfiguration, ;~ SCTM#1000-6-2-14 will equal 11,786 square feet, SCTM#1000-6-2-15 will equal 11,029 square feet and SCTM#1000-6-2-17.1 will equal 69,428 square feet. . ] Status:' '~, Cone ~ t ~: onal Fmal; ..... Approval Recommendations: grant Final Approval at Sept. 8, 2008 Public Meeting Discussion: 1. Recommendations to the Town Board a. Farm Stand Code Amendments b. Amendments to merger waivers c. Adding Bed & Breakfast use category to marine districts 2. Fishers Island Community Center. Proposed amendments to site plan. 2 GOGGINS & PALUMBO ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW P.O. Box 65 13105 Main Road Mattituck, New York 11952 Phone: (631) 298-4200 Fax: (631) 298-4214 August 27, 2008 WILLIAM C. GOGGINS, ESQ. ANTHONY H. PALUMBO, ESQ. Planning Board of the Town of Southold 54375 State Road 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TRACY L. KARSCH, ESQ. Of Counsel DONNA M. PALMER Paralegal RQ~ 6900 Wickham Avenue LLC (Girards Subdivision) 6900 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952 SCTM No. 1000-107.00-10.00-010.001 Dear Planning Board: Again, please be advised that on October 29, 2007, we presented a Sketch Plan Submission for the above referenced property. As of today, we have received no response. Kindly, advise us of the status of the submission. Thank you. WCG\ Ve.ry truly yours, August 19, 2008 GOGGINS & PALUMBO ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAIN P.O. Box 65 13105 Main Road Mattituck, New York 11952 Phone: (631) 298-4200 Fax: (631) 2984214 WILLIAM C. GOGGINS, ESQ. ANTHONY H. PALUMBO, ESQ. Planning Board of the Town of Southold 54375 State Road 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TRACY L. KARSCH, ESQ. Of Counsel DONNA M. PALMER Paralegal RQ~ 6900 Wickham Avenue LLC (Girards Subdivision) 6900 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952 SCTM No. 1000-107.00-10.00-010.001 Dear Planning Board: Please be advised that on October 29, 2007, we presented a Sketch Plan Submission for the above referenced property. As of today, we have received no response. Kindly, advise us of the status of the submission. Thank you. WCG\ Ve/~ur~ W~li~n~ C.'--Go~gi~t-~~ AUG 2 0 2008 Site Plans continued Kruk Greenhouse SCTM#: 75.-1-1.1 Location: 34800 County Road 48, Peconic Proposal: Construct one new greenhouse, @ 20'x124' Action: Review site plan application for appropriate elements to waive. Status: Agricultural Site Plan - new. Recommendations: Accept site plan. Consider waiving site plan elements not necessary. Attachments: Greenhouse photo & description from manufacturer Subdivisions Standard Subdivision of Flora Nursery SCTM# 107-10-10.1 New Application: Review Subdivision Plan. Location: 6900 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, New York Proposal is to subdivide a 10.10 acre improved parcel into 4 lots, where Lot 1 equals 50,433 s.f., Lot 2 equals 54,146 s.f., Lot 3 equals 57,578 s.f., and Lot 4 equals 277,811 s.f. and is improved. Standard Subdivision of Conkling Point SCTM# 53-4-44.1 &44.3 Recommend Preliminary Plat Approval. Location: The property is located on the west side of Kerwin Boulevard, approximately 575 feet west of August Lane, in Greenport, New York Proposal is to subdivide a 7.725-acre parcel into four lots, where Lot 1 equals 29,869 s.f., Lot 2 equals 29,869 s.f., Lot 3 equals 29,869 s.f., Lot 4 equals 29,869 s.f. and the open space parcel equals 4.1 acres, excluding the area of wetlands. This project includes the transferring of 37,882 s.f. of buildable lands from SCTM# 1000-53-4-44.3 onto the subject property for the purposes of establishing yield. Re-subdivision of Ciaglo and Wesnofske SCTM# 69-4-8.1 & 69-4-8.2 New Application: Accept Plat and Recommend Sketch Plan Approval. Location: 36980 County Route 48, Peconic, New York Proposal is for a lot-line amendment to transfer 10,802.51 s.f. from SCTM#69-4-8.1 to SCTM#89-4-8.2 in the AC Zoning District in Peconic, where following the transfer, Lot 1 would equal 8.0726 acres and Lot 2 would equal 1.2741 acres. 4:00 p.m. Site Plans Applications WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, March 3, 2008 at 4:00 p.m. Hudson City Savings Bank Action: Status: Recommendations: Attachments: SCTM#: 1000-122-3-1.2 Location: 11520-11750 Main Road in Mattituck Review new site plan application New site plan application. Consider accepting the application as submitted and begin Referral / SEQRA under an Unlisted Coordinated Action. None · Purita Winery Action: SCTM#: 1000-51-03-4.11 Location: 19110 Soundview Avenue in Southoid Site Plan Status up-date, review of LWRP comments & Town Engineer comments. Status: Pending PB decision at the March 10, 2008 public hearing. Recommendations: PB accepts comments as submitted. Attachments: Letter from Engineer · Seifert Construction SCTM#: 1000-141-3-44 Action: Status: Recommendations: Attachments: Location: 11280 Sound Avenue in Mattituck Site Plan Status up-date, review of LWRP comments & Town Engineer comments. Pending PB decision at the March 10, 2008 public hearing. PB accepts comments as submitted. Letter from Engineer · Brewer Yacht Yard Pavilion SCTM#: 1000-43-3-2 Action: Status: Recommendations: Attachments: Location: 500 Sandy Beach Road in Greenport Site Plan Status up-date and review of revised site plan. Pending PB decision at the March 10, 2008 public hearing. PB accepts the revised site plan as submitted. None · Laurel Creek SCTM#: 125.-3-2.3 Nursery Location: 1900 Main Road in Laurel Proposal: Construct four new greenhouses, two @ 14'x100' and two @ 25'x 100' Action: Review letters from Town Engineer and LWRP Coordinators Status: Agricultural Site Plan - accepted for review. Recommendations: PB accepts Engineer comments and LWRP Consistency Review. Attachments: Letter from Engineer GOGGINS & PALUMBO ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW P.O. Box 65 13105 Main Road Mattituck, New York 11952 Phone: (631) 298-4200 Fax: (631) 298-4214 WILLIAM C. GOGGINS, ESQ. October 29, 2007 Planning Board of the Town of Southold 54375 State Road 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: ANTHONY H. PALUMBO, ESQ. ~unsdl ~1. PALMER ilegal 6900 Wickham Avenue LLC (Girard~ Subdivision) 6900 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, New.~ork 11952 $CTM No. 1000-107.00-10.00-010.001 Dear Planning Board: Enclosed please find the following items for Sketch Plan Submission: 1. Application for Sketch Plan Approval; 2. Full Environmental Assessment Form; 3. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form; 4. Copy of deed to property; 5. Application Fee in the amount of 2,500.00; 6. Five (5) copies of ERSAP; and 7. Five (5) copies of Sketch Plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. WCG\ Submission [Fithout a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#:IO00- {o"I- [0- {0,{ Date: Comments: I. ~)tT-4/~-r'' GOGGINS AND PALUMBO Attorneys' and Counselors at' Law 13105 Main Road, P.O. Box 65 Mattituck, New Yolk 11952 "I'lSl. l~l'l IONIJ, 63 t-2.~-dlO0, ' I:^X 031-298-4214 FACSIMILE 'IRANSMISSIOIN COVER SIIEET FROM: TO: Flii. M: II, E: William C. Gogginsy_ AnLhony I*1. PatulnOO Dumla M, I'almer .... Elalue T. Villailo _._ FAX IFYOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OFTIIE PAGES PLEASE CALL OUR OFFICE PROM lq'LY AT (631) 298-4200 COMMENTS: DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED: ~.1~' _~_O~[q_D~_~'I'IA[~Y NOTE; The d.e,Jmtnts .,:tvmpm,yh,tl tlJl~ I~tsimlle transtuiasion ~unial. collJJdeltliaJ illid/or legl~JlJ3, i)dvilegltl illfOl'ltlltllillt, 'l'h~ ilTJ01'#inlJllit Is htlenllell Ulll)~ for lite 0312Z/20D? 15:46 GOGGIN$ & PALU~O ATTORNEYS ~ COUNSELORS A T LAW 13105 M~ Road P.O. Box ~ ~t~ck, N~ York 11952 Ph~e: (O1) 2~ F~: (631) ~4 Max~h 7, 2007 Planning Board of ~he To~-a of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N~w York 11971 Atto: Anthony Crez~ WII,LtAM C, GOGG~qS A?~r~ONy H PRLUMBO I~3NNA M. PALMER Re: Richard Gir~ds; Minor Subdivision Mattituck, New york Dear Mr. Crezza: Please be advised that I have been retained by Mr. Girards to help him with his application, If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned, Very. truly yours, WCO/dmp ~lC[OSUt¢ William C. Gosgins Project Status Report for Standard Subdivisions Sketch Application Dates Pre-Submission Conference Sketch Application Received ERSAP Submitted ~._~eld Plan Submitted ~ Concept Design Determined Fire Department Comments SEQRA Coordination Landscape Plan Soil Conservation Plan SEQRA Determination SC Planninq Commission Referral SC Planning Commiss on Comments Fire Department Referral Fire Department Comments En,qineer Conference Sketch Plan Submission Conditional Sketch Approval Sketch Approval Preliminary Plat Application Dates (6 months after Sketch Plan Approval) Preliminary Application Received DEIS Submission Application Fees Paid Referral of Road and Drainage Plans Enqineer Conference Comments from Town Enqineer Draft Performance Estimate Draft Covenants and Restrictions Draft Homeowner's Association Agreement Draft Road Maintenance Aqreement Scopinq Session Referral of Leqal Documents to Town Attorney Comments from Lega Department Rece ved FEIS Submission Preliminary Hearing Set Preliminary Hearinq Held Preliminary Hearing Closed Conditional Preliminary Approval Preliminary Approval Final Plat Application Dates (6 months after Preliminary Plat Approval) Final Application Received Application Fees Paid Mylars Received (5) Paper Prints Received (8) Final Road and Drainaqe Plans Performance Guarantee Received Performance Guarantee to Town Board Final Covenants and Restrictions Final Homeowner's Aqreement Final Road Maintenance Aqreement Park and Play,qround Fee Paid Conservation Aqreement Affordable Housing Fee Paid Administrative Fee Paid NYSDEC Wetlands Permit Received NYSDOT/DPW Permit Received Trustee Permit Received Final Hearing Set Final Hearing Held/Closed Filed Legal Documents Conditional Final Approval Final Approval Map Endorsed by Chair LWRP Consistency Review Final Map Routin,q: Tax Assessors Building Department Land Preservation Highway Department Additional Notes: Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Subdivisions I. Application Information Project Title: Standard Subdivision of Girards/Flora Nurseries Map Prepared By: Jeffery T. Butler, P.E and Joeseph A In~[e~no. L.S. Date of Map: May 18. 2007 Date of Submission: October 29. 2007 Applicant: Richard and Carol Girards Tax MaD Number: 1000-107-10-10.1 Project Location: 6900 Wickham Ave. See attached aerial photograph Hamlet: Mattituck Zoning District: AX II. Description of Project Tvoe of AoDlication: Subdivision Type of Subdivision: Standard Subdivision Acreage of Project Site: 10.1 acres Yield Map or Calculation: 4 lots Number of Lots Prooosed: 4 Acres of Ooen Space/Reserved Area: 6.38 Percentage of Open Space/Reserved Area (see attached calculation1: 63.8% Type of Access Provided: Proposed driveway - only 15 ft wide. Needs to be 25'ROW with 16' stone blend road off Wickham Avenue. Length of Access: 431' III. Site Analysis SEOR TyPe of Action: Unlisted Present Land Use: Agricultural/Greenhouses Existing Structures: Yes: 2 story wood frame house, i story ~[ara~[e. I concrete block garage,2 mobile homes, i trialer. I motor home, 11 greenhouses. Existing Permits, Approvals, CO's, etc: Unknown Was Property Previously Subdivided: No, however applicant did speak with Land Preservation on April 14 2006. If Yes, Date of Approval: Existing Easements or Restrictions: None Soil Type: see ERSAP Located within Coastal Erosion Hazard Zone: No Located within Flood Hazard Zone: No Predominant Vegetation: Unknown Significant Trees on Site: Unknown Pementage of Slopes: 0-10% - 100% Name of Abutting Water Body: NA Critical Environmental Area: NA Type of Wetlands on or Adjacent to Site: N/A Are Thera Trails on Site: Unknown Name of Trail: N/A Depth to Water Table: 25' Distance to Public Water: Unknown Source of Water Supply: Undetermined Number of Access Points: Two orocosed Historical or Archaeological Significance: Unknown IV: Permits and/or Review Required From Other A.qencies This project will require review and/or approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, the Town Engineer, and the Suffolk County Planning Commission, Town of Southold DPW. V: Proiect Analysis Proposal is to subdivide a 10.10 acre improved parcel into 4 lots, where Lot 1 equals 50,433 s.f., Lot 2 equals 54,146 s.f., Lot 3 equals 57,578 s.f., and Lot 4 equals 277,811 s.f. and is improved. This is in the A-C Zone. VI: Staff Recommendations The Planning board should consider deeming the application incomplete as per §240-6(B) "no application for a review or approval under this chapter shall be deemed to be complete unless...the application complies with the provisions of this chapter, the Town code, and all other applicable requirements" The following is a list of reasons as to why this application is incomplete: 1) The submitted plan is not in keeping with the intent and purpose of a cluster development. ARTICLE XI, Cluster Development § 240-42. Authority and purpose. A. Authority is hereby granted to the Planning Board pursuant to New York State Town Law § 278 to modify applicable provisions of Chapter 280, Zoning, of this Code, as to layout, configuration and design of lots, buildings and structures, roads, utility lines and other infrastructure, parks and landscaping, to enable and encourage flexibility of design and development of land in such manner as 2 to preserve the natural and scenic qualities of open space lands. Any subdivision designed under this article shall indicate on the final plat that it is a cluster subdivision. · Proposed Lot 4- the open space does not preserve the natural and scenic qualities of open space land. · Placing green houses on top of the land does not preserve the natural qualities of the land. Instead, it disguises and alters the natural state of the land. · The property to the South and east of the parcel is owned and preserved by Suffolk County. Allowing three residential lots to be built would detract greatly from the open space viewshed and the scenic qualities of the open space land. · If buffers are planted to shield the residential lots from the green house operations, the viewshed would further be diminished. §240-43(G): "Views of house lots from exterior roads and abutting properties shall be minimized by the use of natural or landscaped buffers,...or additional landscaping in accordance with this chapter or other provisions of the Code.' · If buffers are planted around the green houses/open space air flow through and across the greenhouses would be hampered and could cause problems for the green houses. · While the proposed open space, LOT 4, does meet the 60% requirement for open space on a clustered parcel as it is 6.38 acres out of a 10.1 acre total parcel size(§240-42(H)(1)), it does not conform to the maximum coverage allowed as per the Bulk Schedule of 20% in an AC zone(§280, Attachment 3). · ^ retail space is proposed on the open space. §280-13(A)(2)(a) only allows the "seasonal sale of products grown on the premises", 75% of what is grown in the greenhouses is tomatoes. These can be sold all-year long. How would this be regulated/enfomed? It is unclear what the applicant would like to sell at this proposed retail space on the open space. · The setbacks proposed are not in conformance with §240- 43(F)(1 )(a)(b)and (c): §240-43(F) House Lot Standards (1): The buildable area of all proposed lots shall meet the following setback requirements to the greatest extent practicable: a) From all external road rights-of-ways, including NYS designated scenic by-ways (S.R. 25 and C.R. 48): 100 feet b) From all other tract boundaries: 50 feet c) From agricultural/ands, either bordering or within the tract: 50 feet. From the aerial it appears as if there is a natural drainage swale on the south-western portion of the property where residential Lot 3 is proposed. This is not in conformance with §240-43 (A). If a natural drainage swale is verified it should be part of the open space, not a proposed residential lot. §240-43(A): The required open space land shall consist of a combination of primary conservation areas and secondary conservation areas as defined in 240-3.... The proposed design shall strictly minimize disturbance of these environmentally sensitive areas. The applicant shall demonstrate that such features will be protected by the proposed subdivision plan. Applicant is creating two flag lots: proposed lots 2 and 3. While ".... the Planning Board may permit a limited number of flag lots in a residential subdivision plat...[the lots must be] well shaped, [and] generally larger than usual lots." Article XII Design Standards, §240-45(D), these proposed lots are not in conformance with §240~45 (D)(1). §240-45 (D)(1) To assure that the flag lot is of adequate size and shape, a flag lot located within the residential zones shall contain at least the minimum lot area of the applicable zoning district within which it is situated, within the bulk of the lot exclusive of the area contained in the flag pole access strip. Proposed Lots 2 and 3 are flag lots and they are each 1.16 an 1.17 acres, almost a half size smaller than the AC zoned minimum lot size of 2 acres. · The applicant is proposing a 16' asphalt driveway, not stone blend. The ROW to all 3 lots must be 25' feet wide as per §161-15 Construction Specifications, and it does not appear to be so. · Further, the proposed driveway, at the terminus has no turnaround as required by §240-45(5)(c) - Design Standards, Cul-de-sac streets. §240-45(5)(c) All residential cul-de-sac shall have a turn-around at the end of the street which shall have a right-of-way radius of 50 feet. The curb at the turn shall have a minimum radius of 44 feet. It is not indicated/proposed as to who will take ownership of the open space. §240-44. An HOA does appear to be applicable, therefore, will it be the Town, a non-profit...? 4 The lot coverage of the proposed open space exceeds the coverage requirements in Chapter 280, Zoning of the Town Code. This does not conform to §240-44(D) Restrictions on use, requiring that use of open space shall be restricted and defined in a conservation easement and limited to: §240-44(D)(2) "...agricultural and horticultural uses...that are specifically needed to support an active, viable agricultural or horticultural operation, subject to applicable lot requirements in chapter 280, Zoning...' §240-43(C) states that "Active agricultural land with farm/agricultural support buildings may be used to meet the minimum required open space lands", it is within the Planning Board's discretion to not allow certain farm/agricultural support buildings as explicitly made clear by the term "may" above. In this instance, greenhouses can be considered "agricultural support" buildings, however, when those support buildings cover a majority of the proposed open space, the intent of the above referenced clause, as well as, the definition and intent of "open space" are not met. According to §240-43(D) "Open space lands should generally remain undivided..." The lands bordering this property to the south and east are preserved Suffolk County farmlands. Creating "open space" covered with greenhouses would fragment the open space, viewshed and continuity of the open space in that area. Retaining the area where the residential lots are proposed would be more in conformance with keeping the open space contiguous. · The map should have solid lines between the properties for a subdivision, not dotted lines. · Topography needs to be indicated on the map. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERIL'FN B. WOODHOUSE Chair JOSEPH TOWNSEND KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Application for Sketch Approval APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Town of S SKETCH APPROVAL for the subdivision describ MAILING AJ)DRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 planning Bo Name of Subdivision GIRARDS 2. Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-107-10-10.1 3. Type of Subdivision Standard [x] Conservation [ ] 4. Hamlet Mattituck 6900 Wickham Avenue 10.1 4 4 AC 5. Street Address/ Project Location 6. Acreage of Site 7. Proposed Yield Number of Lots Proposed Zoning District 10. Date of Submission 11. Please provide the names, addresses and phone numbers for the following people: Applicant: RICHARD VGIRARDS and CAROL GIRARDS lq00 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 ~nmm- (fi~[) 298-5q88 Day ¢631-298-5600 Agent: Property Owner(s): Surveyor: Engineer: CAROL GIRARDS 6900 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 631-298-5988 Joseph A. Ingegno p.O. Box 1931. 322 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 (631) 727 2090 Attorney: WILLIAM C. GOGGINS, ESQ. P.O. Box 65, 13105 Main Road Mattituck, New York 11952 (631) 298-4200 12. Has an application for subdivision ever been filed for this property? If so, please indicate when and whether or not approval was granted by the Planning Board. N0 13. Has a pre-submission conference been held with the Planning Board? If so, provide date. ~q0~qE 14. Has the owner/applicant met with Land Preservation? If so, provide date. Yes, April 14, 2006 15. Is any part of the property in agricultural use? YES 16. Is there an existing or proposed sale of development rights on the property? NO 17. Does the o~vner oxvn any adjacent properties? If so, please indicate the properties by SCTM#. NO 18. Are there any building permits currently pending on this property? If yes, please provide permit number(s). NO 19.The site will be serviced by the following special districts or utility companies: Fire District MATTITUCK Post Office MATTITUCK School District MATTITUCK Water 20. Has LIPA or Keyspan been notified of the proposed subdivision? If so, please provide proof that service will be provided. NO 21. Please indicate the type of open space proposed and how it will be managed? AGRICULTURE 22. Are there any existing s~uctures on the property? If so, please indicate the type of structure and its use(s). Will these structures remain, be removed or altered? GREENHOUSES-Agriculture Production- 75% Pood and 25% Ornamental SUPPORT STRUCTURES-Barns, Office Build±rig and Pack±rig Trailer Family Residence- Remove 23. Based on the parcel yield and the affordable housing requirement of the Town Code, how many Moderate Income Family Dwelling Units are proposed? If the number that will be built is less than 25% of the yield, please indicate how you intend on satisfying the requirement. NA 24. Application completed by [ ] owner [ ] agent Signature of Preparer ~ .~- [ x] other Date September 28, 2007 u,,.. Iu.z,u/ ~b:~D~vI ~CULAKU, SHULMAN&COHEN NO. 0711 P. 3/]2 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS THIS INDENTURE, made the 1" day of August, 2007. BETWEEN; CAROL JEAN GIRARDS of 6900 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, NY 11952, Grantor, AND: 6900 WICKHAM AVENUE, LLC, a New York limited liability company, of 6900 Wick_ham Avenue, Mattituck, NY 11952, ~rantee: WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, in consideration of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10,00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, docs hereby grant and release unto the Grantee, the heirs or successors and assigns of the Grantee forever, bounded and desmbed ns t'ollb~d: RLrNNINO THENCE South 35 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds West, 580 feet along last mentioned land to land now or formerly of Long Island Nurseries; THENCE Sonth 54 degrees 21 minutes 30 seconds West along last mentioned land, 697,21 feet to land now or formerly of Anthony T. Krupski; THENCE along last mentioned land the following two (2) courses an &stances, 1) North 34 degrees 46 minutes 10 seconds West, 234.65 feet; 2) North 34 degrees 59 minutes 40 seconds West, 455.34 feet to the southeasterly sidv of Wickham Avenue; /HENCE North 63 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East along the southeasterly side of Wickham Avenue, 697.22 feet to the point or place of begilmtng. SUBJECT to easements, covenants and restrictions of record, if any. FOR REFERENCE ONLY: Provertv Address: Tax Map No.: 6900 Wickham Avenue I07.-10-10.1 THE CONVEYANCE of the above-described premises is made and accepted subject to a life use reseo'ed to the Grantor herein and to Richard T. Girards, Sr., during their natural lives, so long as they maintain the premises as their principal residence. BEING the same premises described in the Deed to the Grantor herein by Deed dated April 3, 1987 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Offic~ on April 15, 1987 in Book 10293 of Deeds at Page 596. THIS conveyance is mode in the day-to-day business of the Grantor and does not constitute a transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Grantor. TOGETHER with all right, title md interest, if any, of the Grantor in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof, TOGETHER with the appnrtenances and all the estate md rights of the Omntor in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premis~ h~rein granted unto the (h'an~e, the heirs or successors and ~signs of the Orantee forever. AND the Grantor covenants that the Grantor has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the Grantor, in Compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the Grantor will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of thc improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other pm]pose. The word "party].sb311 be ~nstrueO, as if it read. iipan/esl~4whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. written. STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF .,F~,~,¢~ ) ss.: Onthis /~dayof/~'~''' r ,2007, beforeme, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared CAROL ,JEAN GIRARDS, p~rsonally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hedshe/th~ executed the same in his/her/their capacity(les), and that by Ms/her/their signature(s) on the instmmant, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the instnunem. ~r~ &Remm To: Michael J, Hrab, Esq. Seolaro, Shulman, Cohen, Fetter & Burstein, P.C. 507 Plum StFeet, Suite 300 S~racuse, NY 13204 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of e project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or mey not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough t~ allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Pert 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially*large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identlfy the Portions of EAF completed for this project: DPart I DPart 2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: DA. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. DB. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significent.~a~ect for th s Un sted Act on because the m t gat on measure~,descr ~b~d n~P~BT 3 have bee~.requ red; th~r~ore a COND TONED negat ve dec arat on w be prepared.~ DC. The project may result in one or more large end ,mporta~ im ~h~t~ on theenvironment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared~ Name of Action Name of Lead AgenW Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on tha environment. Please complete the entire form, Pads A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of th · application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you bell eve will be needed to complete Pads 2 and 3. It is expected Ihat completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work Is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action GiP, AP, DS STJ~,DIVISION Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 6900 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952 - County of Suffolk Name of Applicant/Sponsor Richard and Carol Girards Address 6900 Wickham Avenue City/PO Mattituck State I'P/ Zip Code 11952 Business Telephone 631-298-5600 Name of Owner (if different) ? .~CAROL GIRARDS Address 6900 Wickham Avenue City/PO Mattituck, BusinessTelephone 631-298-5600 State New York Zip Code 1/1952~ Description of Action: SUBDIVISION of 10.1 Acre Farm Page 2 of 21 , Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A, SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial D Forest []Agriculture •Other D Residential (suburban) [] Rural (non-farm) 10.1 2. Total acreage of project area:, acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland {Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural {Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area ,r / ~ Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate type) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres 10.1 acres 6.06 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage; DWell drained /00 % of site [] Moderately well drained __% of site. ~Poorly drained __ % of site If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~ Yes ~ No a. What is depth to bedrock {in feet) 5, Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~o-,o% 1oo.% [~73~o-~% % [] ~% or greater__% Is project substantial~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? k..J Yes ~ No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes 7, 8. What ia the depth of the water table? 25 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole sourqe aquifer? ~Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? r~No []Yes ~No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: Identify each species: 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? I--I ee EiNo Describe: I 13. Is the project site presently used by ti,e community or neighborhood as an open spece or recreation area? [~Yes r~No if yes, explain: 14. Does the present site i[~ciude scenic views known to be important to the community? 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NONE e. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NONE 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: NONE DYes DYes E]No [~]No b, Size (in acres): [0. ]. Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection7 DYes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DNo L----'"~Yes DNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certifi,ed pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2B-AA, Section 303 and 3047 E]Yes I~]No 19. Is the site located in or substantiall_~L~ontiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 E]Yes E]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? b----~Yes B. Project Description 1, Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). e. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. f. Number of off*street parking spaces existing __; proposed __ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon/completion of project)7 h. if residential: Number and type of housing units: Initially Ultimately One Family Two Family Multiple Family t 4 Condominium i. Dimensions (in feet} of largest proposed structure: height; width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 697.22 How much natural material (i,e, rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. Will disturbed areas be reclah'ned DYes D'o DN/A length. a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No 4 How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? r']Yes ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: __ months, (including demolition) N/A 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month year, {including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [] No Will blasting occur during construction? r~ Yes [] No Number of jobs generated: during construction u'aknow,~-after project is complet9 NONE 9. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project NONE . 1 1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facgities? ~ Yes If yes, explain: ]No 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes []No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes ~ No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? r~ Yes [] No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~ Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes E]No r~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes r~No Page 6 of 21 e, If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes [~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated sit,e life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides~' NYes r~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes [] No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes 21 ..~Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~ Yes [] No ' If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23, Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24-. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes ~ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 2B, Approvels Required: City, Town, Village Board DYes ~ No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes ~ Ne City, Town Zoning Board DYes r~l No city, County Health Department [] Yes r-1 No Other Local Agencies C~Yes [] No Other Regional A~encies [] Yes ~ No State Agancies ~Yes ~] No Federal Agencies ~ Yes [] N o Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed actionir~volve a planning or zoning decision? r~Yes ~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: C~ Zoning amendment []Site plan r~ Zoning variance [~ SpeCial ~se permit r~ New/revision of master plan Lr~ Resource management plan [~ Subdivision [~ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? CONSERVATION AGRICULTURAL 3. What is the maximum potential developmant of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? AS APPLIED FOR 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? AS APPLIED FOR 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~1 Yes [] No What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~ mile radiua o~proposed action;' AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y, mile? [] Yes ~ No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is th,~ minimum lot size proposed? ~O_~.3_:~__Square Feet Page 9 of 21 1 0. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? DYes DNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. DYes D. Informational Details /r) Attach any adc~itional information as may be,~/eeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss g~ch impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid thefts. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ~.T C[~J~D Signature ~1~ ~'-.~ Date 9/28~-/07 Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 , Town o~ Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfi~ont Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial perrnits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfi:ont Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable wilh.,,the,.LWRP, policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be .s~t?fi~as :e0nsistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. "['~i' ' A copy of the LWRP is available in the following pla~s: ~p!itfe at the Town of South~ld'S website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees O~c~'.~e Planning Department,~ll local libraries and the Town Clerk's office, l ' B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 107 10-10.1 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response)? Town Board ~ Planning Board ['~ Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees [] Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Location of action: 6900 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck Site acreage: 10. l Present land use: Agriculture-Residence Present zoning classification: Agriculturel Conservation If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: Richard Girards and Carol Girards 6900 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) 631-298-5600 or 5980 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No [-~ If yes, which state or federal agency? C. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southoid that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ~-~Yes [] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No Not Applicable Attach~ additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ~-] Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [-~ Yes ~] No ~-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes [] No [~]Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Sonthold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes [--] No [-~ Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~-~ No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No [] Not APplicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peeonie Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No ~] Not Applicable At~ach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Towff of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Vq yes So Sot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~'] No ~-~ Not Applicable Created on 5/25/05 11.'20 AM PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: John Cushman, Town Comptroller From: Date: Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chair/VI,~ December 9, 2010 Re: Fees held in Deferred Account B.691 for Flora Nurseries Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-107-10-10.1 The subdivision application referenced above has been withdrawn by the applicant. The Planning Board has agreed to refund a portion of the fees paid, which have remained entirely in the Defen'ed Account. The total amount paid was $2,500. The Planning Board requests a check in the amount of $2,300 payable to Richard Girards and delivered to the Planning Department. The remaining $200 may be applied to Planning Department Revenue (application fees). Thank you. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: March 27, 2008 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith are the checks listed. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Applicant/Project Tax Map ~ Amount Check Name & Type Date/No. Blue Heron Farm/Preserve 75-6-6.1 3,250.00 8/17/07- 143 Girards/Flora Nurseries 107-10-10.1 2,500.00 10/16/07 - 146 Sterling Harbor, Inc. 88-2-15 500.00 12/17/07 - 1068 Conklin Point Estates 53-4-44.1 1,000.00 1/14/08- 62229 Corazzini, Warren 52-5-58.3 1,020.69 1/30/08 - 1008 LR Eric(s). PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWlqSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: March 27, 2008 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith are the checks listed. Please return a receipt to us.~ Thank you. Applicant/Pro, oct Tax Mop # Amount Check Nome & Type Dote/No~ Blue Heron Farm/Preserve 75-6-6.1 3,:J50.00 8/1~/07 - 143 Girards/Flora Nursedes 107-10-10.1 2,500.00 10/16/07- 146 Sterling Harbor, Inc. 88-2-15 500.00 12/17/07- 1068 Conklin Point Estates 53-4-44.1 1,000.00 1114/08- 62229 Corazzini, Warren 52-5-58.3 1,020.69 1/30/08 - 1008 LR' Eric(s). TEST HOLE DATA FLORA SKETCH PLAN PREPARED FOR NURSERIES, INC. SITUA TED A T MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK TAX No. 1000-107-10-10.1. SCALE 1"=50' OCTOBER 11, 2006 JANUARY 26, 2007 REVISED PROPOSED LOTS TOTAL AREA = 439,968.97 sq. ff. 10.100 Dc. ZONING USE DISTRICT: AC (AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION) Og~ 2 9 ~007 Joseph A.~ Ingegno Land Surveyor ~tle Surveys -- Subdivisions -- PHONE (631)727-2090 OFFICES LOCATED AT 322 ROANOKE AVENUE RIVERHEAD, New York 11901 Site Plons -- Construction Loyout Fox (631)727-1727 MAIL/NO ADDRESS P.O. Box 1931 Riverheod, New York 11901-09§§ 26-3,3~-1 / I HoA / Rdb ~ HaA I I I v" I , SOIL id'AP ~C.ALE, 1"=2OO'oO" EXISTIN¢ I~.E.5OUP. CEO* 5lTL/NNAL¥515 CONOERVATION AP. LAS, VARIE.5 8'-0" , J, 8'-O" 51TEDATA: DINNER, FLORA NURSERIES DIST, IOOO SEC., IO-/BLOCK., IO LOT, IO.I AREA OF 51T~: 4~q,q68.q*/ ecL, H:.: lO.lDO o,c.. ZONE: A-G (AC:~.IGULTdRAL CONSERVATION) USE, P..ESIDENGE5 AND 5REENHOUSE5 LOT AREA HITNIN AeRICUL'I~RAL ZONE 4Dq,q6~5.q-/ ~. FT. EXI~TIN~ BUIL[21NE~ INITHIN ZONE (A.-C.), OIL 1 TOP (,,OAT DRAINA F GALC, ULATIONS: VOLUHE P. EQ~' = 6,~2'/38 56LFr.x.16Txl.O=l,106.~4 CU.PT. U~ 2 - IO'~xq' EFFECTIVE [:C-F~ LEACHIN~ POOL5 TOTAL VOLUHE PROVIE)ED = 1.2315~ 6U.PT. AREA VOLUME REG,) = 5,02~dq6 5G.FT.x. JS'~'xI.O=~q254 EdJ.FT. USE 2 - IO'exl' EFFECTIVE E)EFTH LEACHIN~ TOTAL VOLUHE PROVIE)EE) -- qST.8~ CUFT. PAVE,' AREA 'A': PAVE~ AREA ID': 5,028.q6 5~.FT. RAIiC,-N.L = 2" (.161') RUMOR= 6OEFFI(,IB'IT V=At~, PF~OF'OSEE) BUILPlHe AREA HITHIN ZONE (A-C), PAVEMENT DETAIL '/.2.00 5dLPT. = 01.64~o No 5~ALE TOTAL BUILDIN8 AREA HITHIN ZONE (A-CO, 80,q8,5.~,0 E~GLFT.: . I~.~ LOT GOVE~eE ~R MA~MENT ZOO: IV 5TA~ARP ~PlVI~ION, 4 LOT~ NO AFFORPABLE HO~IN~ ~GUI~ TEST HOLE DATA © EX. CONC. 8LOC, K / HOBILE HOP~ x q~.2~ /%,', VARI~ ~ ~'~ LAND IBrD ROANOKE J ~IVE~HEAP, NY I1~01 ROAP 5EGTION bo 2b 0 bO I00 lbo 200 250 BA~P, OOTOBER Il, 2008 ZONING INFORMATION: AGRICULTURAL (A-C): LOT AREA,, MINIMUM ALLOWED', PROVIDED: LOT WIDTH: LOT MINIMUM PROVIDED: 80,000 SQ,FT, LOT 1, 50,433 SF (1.16 AC) LOT 2, 54,146 SF (1.16 AC) LOT 5, 57,578 SF (1,17 AC) LOT 4, 277,811 SF (6.58 AC) ALLOWED: 175' LOT 1, 240' LOT 2, 240' LOT 3, 255' LOT 4, 324' DEPTH: MINIMUM ALLOWED: 250' PROVIDED: LOT 1, 191' LOT 2, 4.31' W/FLAG LOT 3, 62,3' W/FLAG LOT 4, 689,99' FRONT YARD SETBACK; MINIMUM ALLOWED: 60' PROVIDED: LOT 1, 64,75' LOT 2, 63.82' LOT 5, 65,53' LOT 4, 58,89' SIDE YARD SETBACK: MINIMUM ALLOWED: 20' PROVIDED: LOT 1, 66,82' LOT 2, 64,50' LOT 5, 87,65' LOT 4, 0,92' BOTH SIDE YARDS SETBACK: MINIMUM ALLOWED: 45' PROVIDED: LOT 1, 179,55' LOT 2, 191,81' LOT 3, 206,76' LOT 4, 26,74' REAR YARD SETBACK: MINIMUM ALLOWED: 75' PROVIDED: LOT 1, 105,85' LOT 2, 95.26' LOT 3, 83,95' LOT 4, 111,55' LIVABLE FLOOR AREA: MINIMUM ALLOWED: 850 SF PROVIDED: LOT 1, 3,800 LOT 2, 3,800 LOT 5, ~,800 LOT 4, 2,919.54 LOT COVERAGE: MAXIMUM ALLOWED: 20% PROVIDED,, SF SF SF SF LOT 1, 4,76% ~ LOT 2, 4.45% rT LOT 5, 4.17% LOT 4, 16.76% BUILDING HEIGHT: MAXIMUM ALLOWED: 35' PROVIDED'. LOT 1, 26' LOT 2, 26' LOT 3, 26' LOT 4, 26' NUMBER OF STORIES: MAXIMUM ALLOWED: 2.5 STY PROVIDED', LOT I, 2 STY LOT 2, 2 STY LOT 5, 2 STY LOT 4, 2 S~( \ ,~ANITARY YIELD C, ALCULATION~ PROPOSED 5EHAE~E DISPOSAL DI~GHA~E P~OPO~E~ = ~OO O.P.~, / ~I~ENGE ?: : ~ ~.P.D. x 5 RESIDE~E5 = qOO ~.P.D. ~6~ ~5' MIN~ ~ELLIN~ ~ . SANITARY YIELD G~GU~TION: 4 ~XI~TI~ ~XHOU~ STO~ee J21 I~l~.q~ 5~.FT EXISTIN¢ 9E~¢E ~I~PO¢~ EXISTIN¢ ~ 5PAGE = ~ISTIN¢ ¢~ENHOUSE 5PAGE = ~4,12~.8~ X .O4: 2~5..11 ~PO 4 P ~ISTIN¢ e~EENHOUSB STO~¢E 12' 1~l~.f17 5QPT. EXISTIN¢ HOBIL HOME (2 ¢ 150 ~PD) = ' 3OO ,OPP TOTAL DISCHARCE (YIELD) = TOTAL PlSGHA~OE (AG~A~ = ~TAIL CPAGE ~ O~LLl~¢5 = V P~EP 2 5TORY ~OP F~ME ~51P~ 20' ,2,~0 ~T. TO EXIS~ 5Y5~ 15 ~P¢~ 5 X P~ED 2 5TORT ~OD P~HE ~51D~E 2~' ~,400 ~.PT. d IOF2