Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-09/13/2010PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSK/ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Monday, September 13, 2010 6:00 p.m. Present were: Martin H. Sidor, Chairperson William J. Cremers, Member Kenneth L. Edwards, Member Joseph L. Townsend, Member Donald J. Wilcenski, Member Mark Terry, Principal Planner Tamara Sadoo, Planner Kristy Winser, Planner Carol Kalin, Secretary SETTING OF THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING Martin $idor: Good evening, and welcome to the Southold Town Planning Board regularly-scheduled monthly Public Meeting. Our first order of business is to set Monday, October 18th, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board Public Meeting. William Cremers: So moved. Kenneth Edwards: Second. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favo~ Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. Southold Town P ann n.q Board PaRe Two S__~otembe~ PUBLIC HEARINGS 6:00 p.m. - Fischer, Daniel & Nancy - This is a proposed 2-lot standard subdivision of a 1.6682-acre parcel where Lot 1 would total 36,333 sq. ft. and Lot 2 would total 36,332 sq. ft. in the R-40 Zoning District. ZBA approvals (area and setback) have been granted for this property. The property is located at 38785 NYS Route 25, Odent. SCTM#1000- 15-8-1.1 Martin Sidor: Anyone who wishes to address to the Planning Board on this application, please step forward to either microphone, state your name and address and print them on the paper provided for the record. Charles Cuddy, 445 Gfiffin.q Avenue, Riverhead, NY: I represent the applicant. As indicated, the Zoning Board of Appeals approved this. It is now before your Board. This is on for conditional preliminary approval, and we believe that both lots are appropriate. They are the same size lots as the lots in the area around them. The access, as the Board knows, is on two separate roads, so I would ask that the Board give this preliminary approval. Thank you. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Is there anyone else from the audience who wishes to address this application? Hearing none .... William Cremers: I make a motion to close the headng. Joseph Townsend: Second. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. 6:05 p.m. - JEMCO Winery - This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located at 825 NYS Route 25 approximately 200' e/o Bailey Avenue on the n/s/o NYS Route 25 in Greenport. SCTM#1000-35-1-24 Martin Sidor: Anyone in the audience who wishes to address to the Planning Board on this application, please step forward to either microphone, state your name and address and print them on the paper provided for the record. Nancy Steelman, Samuels & Steelman Architects in Cutcho.que: This is one of my proiects; my clients are also here toni.qht, if there are any questions for them. Southold Town Plannin.q Board Pa.qe Three September 1,3, 2010 This is an application for site plan approval for a small winery that has been developed on a pamel that is 60.33 acres. There are currently 20+ acres that are planted in vineyard. This is currently zoned R-80, which is 2-acre residential. We have tried to locate the winery back into the property so that we are approximately 1,680' from Route 25, current required (inaudible). We could be upwards of 100' from the read. We have side yard setback from Sound Road property--that would be the west property line-- that's 788'. On the east property line they'll be set back 471'. We are approximately 700' from (inaudible) on Long Island Sound. The building is on 3 floors; we have a full basement which will be used for production of wine and teak storage. That square footage on the ground level in the basement is 3400 sq. ft., so it's a relatively small structure. The overall dimensions are approximately 38' x 88'. We have the main floor, which is primarily for tasting and some retail space. That's another 3,400 sq. ft.; that would be the general footprint on the first floor. There are two mezzanines on the second level. That total would be 8,419'. Let me make sure that it's understood that this is multiple floors, the square footage, and that square footage is used for (inaudible) parking calculations. The site has a long driveway coming back off Route 25 and there is parking for 42 care. So it's a relatively small parking area and that's based on one car per 200 sq. ft. There is some overflow additional parking and we have a gravel area for an additional 36 care, an additional lawn area for any potential overflow. The building is designed as a barn structure; it's relatively straightforward. We've just been now studying some change in materials that we are going in with wood shingles and a little different (inaudible) pattern (inaudible) architectural review and they were very happy with it. (inaudible) If you have any questions, I'm here to answer them. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Paul Loeb: rm bom and raised across the street from this proposed site. This is my time to speak and I'm not in favor of it. rm wondering where the people from Sound Drive and Peconic Landing are because it's certainly going to impact them a good deal. They surround the area; I don't know if they are supposed to be publicly notified or it's just the people directly across from the vineyard? Joseph Townsend: Contiguous property owners were notified. Paul Loeb: So I'm opposed based on a couple of things: #1 they are changing the character of the area. There is going to be increased noise, increased traffic, and that's an awfully large building. If I heard correctly, there is parking for 78 care. That is a lot of care to pull around to that intersection. The intersection is now going to exit right at somebody's residence. It's on a busy read; we are prepared--we live on a busy read-- but to drop 78 care in front of our house at night as they leave the winery from whatever events are going on and music--it's not fair. If they are fomed to go ahead with this, my recommendation would be that they move the entrance west to align with Bailey Avenue. Though the people there are not going to be too happy to have 78 care come at them at 9:00 at night when the kids are sleeping and everything is settled down for the day. In addition, when they drop onto the North Road, some of them are going to be turning into Main Street in Greenport. The intersection there is an accident waiting Southold Town Plannin.q Board Pa.qe Four September 13, 2010 to happen; there's not enough turnoff space. If you have more than two or three care coming from the East turning into the Village, they stack up and they block the North Road. You are creating a traffic jam as they exit. It's dangerous there. You are going to have more foot traffic going as well. There is no sidewalk in any of those drawings. You already have, when Peconic Landing went up, they overlooked the sidewalk. It stops around Bailey Avenue and doesn't pick up again until Peconic Landing. So you have people walking in the street, walking across people's yards--there's no path for them. Then you have all the workers from Peconic Landing. So that changed the foot traffic in front of the house. So that would need to be addressed as well because now you're going to have not just Peconic Landing, but you have people walking to the vineyard. You're going to have foot traffic. It's definitely going to change the area. I understand the guy wants to make the most amount of money he can with his project. But it's just not a good idea. You've really got to work out the traffic issues, the people issues; the noise is going to be unbearable. Our homes aren't going to be our homes anymore once the winedes get going with weddings and events. There's noise coming from Peconic Landing now that they have permits to do weddings. It runs until 11:00 on a Saturday night. That's late. Thank you for hearing me. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Anyone else in the audience? Susan (and Nestor) Lanfra¥, pmperb/owners at 1000 North Road, Greenport: (directly across from the proposed site of construction): Good evening ladies and gentlemen. We live next to Mr. Loeb and we concur with all of the objections that he has raised. What I'd like to bring to your attention is that the Village of Greenport and the Town of Southold have been working very hard to keep a level of rural character and not allow large retail operations to move in on that Route 25 intersection. I know about 14 years ago, before we began living on our property, 12 years ago, when a retail stdp mall was denied at the comer of Main Road and Route 25 for the very reasons that Mr. Loeb is bdnging up today: the traffic issues, the bdnging in of retail that would change the character of what we are really trying to preserve. I, too, have a big question on the impact of the traffic in the neighborhood for all the reasons that were stated by Mr. Loeb. I think that we sit in our living mom and on our front lawn and we watch the traffic patterns of ferry traffic and other traffic coming and going. There are times when three care try to make a left onto Main Road right past this property. It backs up the read and we have about a 50-car lineup standing still on the North Road waiting to get around the traffic that wants to turn left. You already have a problem. The Portly Grape, which used to be the Shady Lady, has been very aggressive in its marketing and it's attracting (thank goodness) a really good crowd. What that means is when they have a good crowd, they are parking up and down Main Road (Route 25) on the shoulder of the mad, completely blocking the mute for pedestrians. There is no sidewalk. So when they are having an event, and it's a good event, all of that mad is now parked along-- there is no shoulder anymore for any disabled care, there's no way for walkers to walk without going out into traffic. So I think those are areas that really need some attention by the Town of Southold and perhaps by NYS Traffic to kind of unwind and work out what this is going to need. It's not insignificant that 78 care with ovedlow for 12§ are being planned for parking. That's just people who park. They come and go on the hour--they don't stay a long time. So you're thinking: "Oh, 78 cars, but 78 times Southold Town Plannin,q Board Pa,qe Five September 13, 2010 however many hours that this place is in operation. So it's going to be constant flow in and out. I don't want to try your patience any longer with all of the negatives, but I would say again, please take a look at this. We're trying to keep that balance. As you go along Route 48 and Route 25, notice that the turn-ins for every single winery- including out to Sound Avenue--ars modest; they ars small in scale. They are not very large operations and they don't really look intrusive. Thers ars no big signs like some of the winedes down on this Route 25 ars now. I would say try to keep it in character. We're not saying don't put something thers; just look at it, make it in scale, keep it where it's balancing with the needs of the neighborhood and with the owner and with future people who want to come and settle in our area. Thank you very much. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Deborah Hooper-Gdasda, 850 Bailey Avenue, cor. Route 25, Greenport: Sorry I don't have a baby sitter; I just came from work. I echo Susan's words and Mr. Loeb's words. The traffic is really unbearable on our mad. Where predominantly the ferry traffic coming from Orient--it's horrible in the summer--you can't even pull out of Bailey Avenue and make a left turn to get into town or to get down to Route 25. The hardship of adding additional traffic to that rsad is going to cause some great accidents. That intersection where the blinking light is that goes down into Greenport has had many accidents~no fatalities that I know of, but it's really an accident waiting to happen. I want to keep Greenport and Southold rural. I moved here because of its rural attributes. It's a town like I grew up in. I don't want it to get any bigger and it's not a question of being against progress. It's just we have to put things into perspective and keep the arsa rural. People like coming hers and visiting but honestly I'm very happy when they go home at the end of the summer. So I hope you consider what we ars saying--that it's going to be a real hardship for our neighborhood to endure the additional traffic in the arsa. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Anyone else in the audience? Robert J. Syron, President & CEO of Peconic Landin.q: At this time, Peconic Landing is not for or against this project, but we do have some concerns. Obviously, where our (inaudible) ars located--the vineyard is going to be built about 500' from nine of our residential units. We ars looking for appropriate sound screening as well as visual screening for the property. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Mr. Cuddy? Charles Cuddy, Esq.: I represent Peconic Landing and rd just like to supplement Mr. Syron's remarks. When I look at this site plan, it is not 78 parking spaces, it is 138. There's 42, 36 and 60 overflow. That's a lot of parking and that means a lot of people. Our concern, as Mr. Syron pointed out, is that there can be special events, which winedes seem to do, and while we ars not against special events, we would hope that thers might be some covenant that if the special events make enough noise to upset the neighborhood, that the neighbors as well as the Town can enforce their dghts. And I would hope their rights would include either forfeiting or denying special permits for Southold Town Plannin,q Board Pa.qe Six September 13, 2010 special events if in fact the neighbors are constantly harassed by late night music and late night noise. It bears on Peconic Landing a great deal; there are people who are elderly there, who came there because of the setting and they are going to be 500' away from whatever events they have. Thank you. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Yes? Laurie Hollender, Sound Road, Greenport: I just want to concur with everything that has been said so far. As far as the traffic goes, that's not what I have come to speak on, but it took me about ten minutes to come out into the street and then right in front of the Portly Grape somebody had their car parked; they're parking all along the mad there. Even if you can see the cars coming from the East, you can't get out far enough with all these cars parked on the side of the road. I almost had to turn around and possibly go into town and come back another way--it's very, very dangerous. With the increased traffic that this is going to bring, I don't know what it's going to mean. But now, also, on another note that's really horrible for us, is the possible sound that we're going to have to hear--the possible noise invasion into our property. We already have been inundated with the Portly Grape until really late hours at night with loud blasting music. Now we are concemed that this is going to be--and it might not bc but we are very, very concemed that this is going to be another noise problem stemming from this. We are just hoping that if the project does happen, the people who are doing it will really consider not shrubbery, because that doesn't work, but some kind of technology that will buffer the noise because it's just horrible. I represent a lot of people who couldn't be here tonight. Some people got lost--they just called mo they are on their way. We are really, really concerned about what this is going to mean because we can't--with the Portly Grape--we couldn't go into our backyards anymore. And now this is going to flood us from both sides. It's unbearable. That's what I have to say. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Is there anyone else in the audience who wishes to address this? John Costello: I represent myself and my wife, Sara, who live directly across the street from that property. That property could be resulting in many home--none of which would ever be affordable ,'~NO acre zoning on a 60-some odd acre parcel of land, public sewer out front, there's public water out front. My preference is to have the winery. My wife's preference would be to support the winery. They are not doing land office business at certain times of the year. If it's full impact of homes vs. a winery, I'll take the winery. I'd like to support this project. Thank you. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Is there anyone else? Pantelis Papazo,qlov, 7 Red Oak Court, Dix Hill,~: Good evening. I happen to be a part owner of the property that some people mentioned here--right at the intersection where the Main Road comes into the Village, which now me and my partners are sitting there for about 30 years. We have invested a lot of money in that property and we show that property being condemned. They say it's being condemned because we bought the property many years ago in the late '70's when that was the only commercial property Southold Town Plannin,q Board Paqe Seven September 13, 2010 here in Greenport. We got ail the permits here from the Town and one January evening in the middle of the winter, we received a stop order--we had already laid foundations down. We went to court a couple of times and lost the case for different reasons that I don't want to go into detail. Now, rm not so sure whether to speak for the property that is being attempted to be developed now across the street from us, or speak for it. What I would like to say is that if a piece of land anywhere in the USA is being sold and is being bought by individuals. And that individual is trying to develop that piece of land according the existing laws and according to the zone, then that particular land--say it was zoned commercial---then I have a dght to develop that land as commercial. If the respective Board here should have plans when the Village was being developed and they had considered that, you know that particular property might be a betterment to the community. They might have thought of it at the onset of planning a particular area. But once that area is commercial area, then rm all for it. I don't like to condemn the property myself. But my other question is, going around this Town here, I see a lot of properties that were zoned for agricultural and then all of a sudden these buildings in the middle of the property that was for agricultural use that are now being used commercially. This is a conflict. (inaudible) What is the designation of this land? Is it commercial or is it for mixed use? I would like to know. If it is mixed use and commercial then they have a right to develop. I had a right to develop my own land, I had foundation there for 30 years that was buded underground and it's the ugliest part in the Town. And I was condemned. Let me add something here because a lot of people here could become very emotional when they descdbe the well-being and how they would like to protect the lives. I feel the same way where I live. If I see something that is being developed that is contrary to the zoning or the laws, then I am going to object as well. But my biggest complaint about some people in this town--perhaps you know what happened to this (inaudible) some 25 years ago. When we presented our plans here to develop that piece of land dght at the comer, a member of the Board stood up and said "we are not going to allow these bdcks to turn Greenport into Jamaica Avenue." Now that was an ethnic slur. We were pushed out of Greenport just because we were Greeks. You know, this hurts. And it hurts to this day and bdngs tears to my eyes, because I had a dream like everybody else has a dream to live a nice life and to do the most that one can do about himself. I invested a lot of money and I don't want to see other people investing money in this Village, when they want to create some business and they want to renovate the value of the properties around here, to be pushed away like I was pushed away. Like the previous owner of my property was pushed away as well. So again, I would like to know whether these properties around here in Southold that are agricultural zoned, if they really have permits to develop commercial properties within the property. Because everywhere you go you have people selling tomatoes. A lot of people are concerned about traffic. Why don't you drive around Southold and see how many commercial spaces you have over there. Everybody is posing a threat to accidents. Thank you. Martin Sidor: I will simply say this property is zoned ACR-80 and this use is permitted. Pantelis Papazo.qlov: Has it always been, or has it changed? Martin Sidor: I don't know what the history of the property is. Southold Town Plannin.q Board Pa,qe Ei,qht September 13, 2010 Joseph Townsend: They added wineries to agricultural designation. Martin Sidor: Do you mean the zoning designation of the property? Pantelis Papazo.qlov: Many years ago, let's take it back 30 years ago--they were all agricultural properties and then they changed--they petitioned and they gave them permits to develop it commemially. Then I bought a commemial property and I invested money in that--I got all the permits from you people and we didn't do anything contrary to the law and then we were stopped. I don't think this is fair to buy a commemial property then all of a sudden you wake up one morning and you discover that it's not, and other people buy agricultural and then the next moming it's mixed use and it's commemial. I think it's very unfair. James Dinizio, Jr., 39 Sound Road, Greenport: Besides the people in Peconic Landing, I am probably the closest to this project. I live about midway up, about 700' from the sound. It must have been changed, because when I first looked at it, it was much closer to the Sound. You guys had them move it back or something, during the course of something? Martin Sidor: The building? No. James Dinizio: I came in here once, I looked at a plan--it looked like that was up on the Sound, closer to the Sound. But in any case, I have no objection at all to this. That land has sat there for many, many years. Originally it was zoned Hamlet Density--four houses per acre. They had sewers. That went on for a while and then they changed it to upgrade it to two-acre. I was pleasantly surprised when I saw all the trees coming down and chewed up and a vineyard went in them it's very nico besides the purple- ness of the mad after the birds get done with it, it's an asset. I think that having a tasting room and a relatively small building there, three stories and 8,000 sq. ft. I recognize that vineyards throughout the Town can hold special events. You all know rm on the Zoning Board of Appeals so I know a little big about that. I want to give you a little history of that whole entire area. Because you live there, you think it's Residential. But I'm going to tell you that it's Business. There are two marinas not a quarter mile away from them very large and two districts. There's this gentleman's property which, by the way, I was on the Board that denied him. Their problem was that they were asking for something that wasn't allowed. That piece of property was zoned the way it was zoned for residential office so that during the course of time when the hospital needed more space, there would be something there. How do I know that? Because I was on the Committee then. I think Mr. Townsend was probably there at the time too when we were thinking about zoning and we went through the whole thing--we had all these discussions. That's how it came about. It wasn't an accident. Unfortunately, these people were asking to do a supermarket or a drug store or something like that. They poured foundations and that just isn't allowed in the zone. The Zoning Board denied it. It certainly wasn't for anything other than zoning reasons. We have Peconic Landing. Now, say what you want--it's not residence, it's not houses~it's a huge apartment building, it's a nursing home, it's now a museum obviously, evidently, and a place where weddings are held. Yes, cars go in and out of that place quite a bit. Our Southold Town Plannin.q Board Pa.qe Nine Se tember 13 2010 intemection is busy. I've never seen cam backed up 50, but I have a GPS and rve been measuring it. rve never waited all summer long mom than a minute and a half to get out of that intemection--and I go straight out. (inaudible) So you've got Peconic Landing, you've got Skipper's down thero you've got plenty of stuff--a gas station the other way. It's the way it's supposed to be. With the winery there, they might have affaim. I think the Town is going to start taking cam a little bit mom of watching what the wineries are doing and how they am doing it. I undemtand there am some commercial uses going on in thero mstaumnt ownem am having problems with it. The wineries am having problems trying to make money. I have to go to hearings where mstaumnt guys came one month, winery guys came the next, and they am all saying the same thing: we got a business, we gotta run it. We have to be profitable. And guess what--that's what kept $outhold Town the way it's been--which is probably a very remarkable place. I believe it will stay there--just look at the map. When you look at the map, it makes a lot of sense. I think if you're going to consider anything, you need to consider the application before you. Traffic is traffic. But that was all considered when it was zoned. Certainly, when we inserted these uses, Peconic Landing was the same thing--it was not allowed in that zone until we inserted that use in that zone. It's the same with agricultural. Wineries weren't allowed there until we inserted the use. If we am going to change a zone (inaudible) a couple of meetings that said should we put wineries? But let people who grow gropes have a tasting room. That's how it came about. And that's all these gentlemen am trying to do. (inaudible) So I ask you not to consider any covenant, any sound barriers--it's all 100' away from the nearest residence, that's a football field and a quarter--that's a long way. I think we am going to have a noise ordinance hem pretty soon and maybe people am just overreacting from what they mad in the paper about a few places that probably went a little overboard as far as noise is concerned. But please I ask you not to delay the planning business and let the gentleman go on with his. Thank you. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Anyone else in the audience who wishes to address the P~anning Board on this application? John Costello, 1210 North Road: One question that came up on this application was: what was the previous use of this property?. It was a farm. It was farm for many yearn and had a little farm stand out them. Adjacent to it was Porky's Restaumnt. Porky's was a big event. I've seen cars at Porky's--hundreds of people at events at that restaurant. But it was a farm stand for many years. Martin Sidor: Do you have a question regarding this application? Pantelis Papazo,qlov: Like I said, I have no objection (inaudible) this particular person is allowed to do this, then he's allowed to do that. We cannot be changing things overnight and catching people by surprise. You have people investing a lot of money into properties and they try to develop them and then we have a condemnation. As I said, I was caught on the other end. Of course, some people hem feel that they have (inaudible) because they objected for the same masons hem tonight about the traffic, about this and that, but the same night we am being denied another person down the road with a restaurant got a permit to use adjacent land for parking--you know what I'm Southold Town Plannin.q Board Pa.qe Ten September ~ 2010 talking about--it's dght at the corner. You have a lot of people parking and exiting from them. To this day, I think accidents have occurred or fatalities have occurred in that particular ama. Again, it is to the interest of the individual who owns a house hem to maintain a nice envimnment for themselves and their families, but you have to consider what is going on with the other site as well. Thank you. Martin Sidor: I saw a hand--yes? Paul Loeb,1050 North Road: (inaudible) go to the permitted uses of the land, which sounds like what they am doing is the furthest expansion that could be done with the land to keep it as a farm. The pm vious uses--it was a farm--it did have a farm stand, but them was no need for 100-120 parking spots. It was a small farm stand. They would give vegetables for the members of the neighborhood, the families. They participated with this little pocket neighborhood just outside of the Village. The scale of what they am doing hem is way different than previous usage which was a farm. Then it was overgrown with a forest across the stm et--so a big change in character to the neighborhood. Martin Sidor: I will simply say that agriculture has been one big change over the last 30 years. As a farmer, I mcognize the changes from the traditional crops hem to something like this. But this is a permitted use; it is mcognized by NYS Ag & Markets. Simply because it's a permitted use does not mean it doesn't have to go through a pmcess~both a public input and scm ening and traffic concerns. So, it's not a permitted use and nothing else takes place. There am still m quire ments that will be asked of the applicant. Paul Loeb: When it was Porky's Restaurant, that was pdor to the Seajet being out in o~ient, so the traffic to the ferry was less. You now have all of that additional traffic. When that is built, I think the homes around it will devalue based on the noise. It's according to how it goes with the noise and the functions and the traffic. But nice homes that am surrounding them now am going to be devalued because nobody will want to be them. So they'll only buy based on price, so it will lower the value of them. Thank you again. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Is them anyone else in the audience who wishes to addm ss the Planning Board? Nancy, maybe some questions that you wanted to answer or to clear some of the questions that were bm ught up as far as parking, possibly?. Nancy Steelman: Yes. The parking requirements: we have one pdmary lot which is 42 spaces. That is based on the Planning Board's requirement, a zoning code mquirement. As many of the wineries have had parking issues in the past, the Planning Board has also acknowledged that certain ama is set aside for overflow parking when them is a special event, and that is what we have provided. We have pm vided an additional gravel ama that is going to be for harvest ama during the Fall season and also for spillover parking. So we tried to accommodate the Planning Board's concerns about parking on site. I'd also like to note that the Town-as it is my understanding through the Suffolk Times and also through watching community Town Board meetings Southold Town Plannin,q Board Pa.qe Eleven September 13.2010 about the sound/noise ordinance--Mr. Russell is really trying to make that happen in the next couple of months..Public headngs are starting to go on. My clients will always make sure that they do everything they can to respect the Town Code and not try to violate anything. Martin Sidor: I'm not sure but anytime the winery has a special event, do they need a permit where they have to come before the Town Board and explain themselves? Nancy Steelman: My understanding is it's through the Zoning Board chairman. A special permit would be granted to them looking at the use and time of event and parking requirements also for a certain amount of people. There are certain parameters and our clients will meet all them. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Susan Nestor: What I am asking to the architect is that since their sound travels so rapidly and so far, are there some precautions being made in this plan of this building that will take into consideration buffering the Sound so that it doesn't emanate to the houses which are so closo they're on both sides to the east and to the west and up and down that whole Sound Road. I don't know technically what can be done, but I know barders can be built. For outdoor music, there could be a sound wall or something that can buffer the sound to keep the people in the neighborhood from being miserable. Nancy Steelman: There probably are sound issues here depending on the events that are being held. But I think one of the things that we've tried to do and to prevent sound from traveling is that the building proper is 748' from any of the property lines along Sound Road. From a distance, we've tried to locate it so that sound will not travel. I can't determine that within a certain decibel range there would be some issues there, but I think that, with the noise ordinance potentially going into effect, there will be monitoring along property lines. I can't really say for each event what they would do in terms of locating the speakers, the direction of speakers and wind and different issues. Susan Nestor: I saw the map and I saw where it was located, and sound really travels. That amount, 700', or the 400' from the other side, is nothing, absolutely nothing. It's a tiny, short distance. So, for sound purposes, when you hear somebody coming down the street, you can hear them on the other end often. So unless something is actually done, like structurally--and I know some people say vegetation: we can plant trees to buffer. Even that does very little. Unless there's some structural mechanism taken into consideration, you're going to have a lot of unhappy neighbors. I know that. So my question is, are you saying to me that there is nothing structural being considered? Martin Sidor: Anyone else? Southold Town Plannin,q Board Pa,qe Twelve September 13, 2010 James Dinizio: These are my neighbors, they are all very nice people and they are all very concerned. The concern is emanating from a very bad neighbor dght now, OK--in the Portly Grape. That is a valid concern on Sound Road because one person just doesn't seem to want to be a neighbor. I just ask you---don't make your decision don't hang a rope around the Kontakosta's neck because Mr. Portly Grape can't be neighborly. OK? Now he's operating out of a building I think is illegal, rm dealing with the Town with that dght now, and quite honestly I'm not getting very far. But I can tell you--rm begging you not to hang the Portly Grape's--I don't want to be too hard, but the man is just not a goodneighbor. He's just not a good person, I think. I don't want you to judge Kontakosta, this winery, based on that. Don't put any other restrictions that you wouldn't put on any winery. The man is agricultural; he's entitled to everything that he is asking you to do. You know it, I know it, and again, my neighbors are worded about the Portly Grape which I believe and I think my neighbors believe he is not entitled to do what he is doing. But don't judge these people on that. Thank you. Martin Sidor: Thank you. Anyone else? Susan Nestor: Not to beat a dead horse, but just one more consideration. We've talked about sound, we've talked about size, and we've talked about parking and traffic. Signage is the last frontier. I would just ask you, as you are looking at the site plan and the plans as they move forward, to think about the appropriateness of the signage. Sited so far back on the lot, I think that the normal tendency would be to make as grand an entrance as possible to catch your attention from people going by. That, I think would be the kiss of death for what we are trying to accomplish on North Road. That's just my final word. Thank you. Martin Sidor: Thank you. No one else? Donald Wilcenski: I make a motion to close the hearing. William Cremers: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. William Cremers, Donald Wilcenski, Kenneth Edwards, Martin Sidor: Aye. Martin Sidor: Opposed? Joseph Townsend: Aye. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. Donald Wilcenski: Mr. Chairman, I will offer the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board WHEREAS, this site plan is for construction of an 8,419 sq. ft. building with associated parking for the purpose of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District; and Southold Town Planninq Board PaRe Thirteen Se tember 13 2010 WHEREAS, on May 17, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. William Cremers: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS, STANDARD SUBDIVISIONS, RE- SUBDIVISIONS (Lot Line Changes) Re-Issue Final Approval: Zuckerberfl~ Lloyd - This proposal is for an 80/60 clustered conservation subdivision on 32.83 acres of land where Lot 1 equals 65,562 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 77,694 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 29.5416 acres and is proposed to be preserved through a Sale of Development Rights to the Town of Southold. The property is located at 2350 Wells Road on the s/w corner of Wells Road & NYS Route 25 in Peconic. SCTM#1000-86-1-10.9 Kenneth Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, this proposal is for an 80/60 clustered conservation subdivision on 32.83 acres of land where Lot 1 equals 65,562 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 77,694 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 29.5416 acres and is proposed to be preserved through a Sale of Development Rights to the Town of Southold excluding 21,374 square feet of subdivision open space dedicated to the Town of Southold in fee as a drainage easement; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Final Approval upon the maps prepared by Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor, dated Apdl 2, 2009 and last revised on March 17, 2010; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board passed a resolution dedicating Subdivision Open Space in the amount of 21,374 square feet to the Town of Southold in fee title to be used for drainage purposes only; and Southold Town Plannin,q Board Pa,qe Fourteen September 13, 2010 WHEREAS, on July 28, 2010, the applicant submitted revised draft Covenants and Restrictions for the above-referenced application; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the revised draft Covenants and Restrictions; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby rescinds Final Approval granted on May 10, 2010; William Cremers: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. Kenneth Edwards: and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby re-issues Final Approval upon the Final Plat "Subdivision Map for Zip Peconic Wells, LLC" prepared by Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor, dated April 2, 2009 and last revised on July 23, 2010, and upon the "Final Road and Drainage Plan - Subdivision Map for Zip Peconic Wells, LLC" prepared by Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor, dated April 6, 2009 and last revised on June 15, 2010, subject to the following condition: A copy of the filing of Covenants and Restrictions with the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk including liber and page number submitted to the Southold Town Planning Board. Donald Wilcenski: Second. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. I just want to take time back to thank you for the input. I always miss that point--when I get home and I'm thinking what makes this process really work is the public coming to the meetings and having their input. So, for those who spoke, I appreciate it and thank you. Southold Town Plannin,q Board Pa.qe Fifteen September 13 2010 Cichanowicz, David - This proposal is to subdivide a 24.82-acre parcel into 4 lots where Lot 1 equals 73,336 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 73,336 sq. ft., Lot 3 equals 19.415 acres upon which the Development Rights have been sold to the County of Suffolk, and Lot 4 equals 2.0 acres. The property is located s/o NYS Road 25, 1,506' e/o Indian Neck Road and n/o Leslie Road in Peconic. SCTM#1000-85-3-10.2 & 97-10-2 Joseph Townsend: WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 24.82-acre parcel into 4 lots where Lot 1 equals 2 acres, Lot 2 equals 73,336 sq. ft., Lot 3 equals 73,336 sq. ft. and Lot 4 equals 19.415 acres upon which the Development Rights have been sold to the County of Suffolk; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Final Plat Approval on the map entitled "Subdivision Map Prepared For David J. Cichanowicz" prepared by John C. Ehlers, L.S., dated November 5, 2002 and last revised on September 14, 2009; and WHEREAS, by August 12, 2010, the number of required copies of Final Mylars and Final Maps as outlined in Southold Town Code §240-20(D)(1) had not yet been submitted; and WHEREAS, on August 30, 2010, all required copies of Final Mylars and Final Maps were submitted to the Southold Town Planning Board; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby rescinds Final Plat Approval previously granted on July 12, 2010; William Cremers: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. Joseph Townsend: and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby re-issues Final Plat Approval upon the map entitled "Subdivision Map Prepared For David J. Cichanowicz" prepared by John C. Ehlers, L.S., dated November 5, 2002 and last revised on September 14, 2009. William Cremers: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. Southold Town Plannin,q Board Pa,qe Sixteen September 13, 2010 Re-Issue Conditional Sketch Approval: Colony Pond - This proposal is for a standard subdivision of a 13.540-acre parcel into five lots where Lot I equals 35,567 sq. ft.; Lot 2 equals 336,916 sq. ft. inclusive of a 41,424 sq. ft. building envelope and 295,492 sq. ft. of subdivision open space; Lot 3 equals 30,471 sq. ft.; Lot 4 equals 30,029 sq. ft.; and Lot 5 equals 29,358 sq. ft. in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located on the s/s/o Colony Road, approximately 470' e/o Bayview Avenue in Southold. SCTM#1000-52-5-60.3 William Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I will offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, this proposal is for a standard subdivision to subdivide a 19.825-acre parcel into five lots where Lot 1 equals 40,571 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 40,436 sq. ft., Lot 3 equals 40,337 sq. ft., Lot 4 equals 40,000 sq. ft. and Lot 5 equals 40,000 sq. ft. in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for Sketch Approval was submitted on June 9, 2006 and included the submission of a Yield Plan and Existing Resources and Site Analysis Plan (ERSAP); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the Yield Map and the Existing Resources and Site Analysis Plan (ERSAP) at several Work Sessions after the initial submission and required that the maps be revised to conform to the requirements of Sections A106-11(A) and (B) of the Town Code; and WHEREAS, on October 29, 2007, the applicant submitted a revised Yield Plan prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, dated October 13, 2005 and last revised on August 22, 2007, depicting a total of five (5) lots; and WHEREAS, on October 29, 2007, the applicant submitted a revised Existing Resources and Site Analysis Plan prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E., dated June 29, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the revised Yield Map and ERSAP and Sketch Plan at their Work Session on January 28, 2008 and determined that the maps conform to the requirements pursuant to Sections A106-11(A) and (B) of the Town Code; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board initiated the SEQRA coordination for this application on July 11, 2006; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2008, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, established itself as lead agency for the unlisted action and, as lead agency, granted a Negative Declaration for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2008, the Southold Town Planning accepted the Yield Plan prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, dated October 13, 2005 and last revised on Southold Town Planning Board PaRe Seventeen September 13, 2010 August 22, 2007, and the ERSAP prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E., dated June 29, 2007; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2008, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Conditional Sketch Approval upon the map entitled "Road and Drainage Plan of Colony Pond", dated Apdl 4, 2006 and last revised June, 29, 2007, prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E., subject to the following conditions:. 1. The submittal of proof that the pamel is not encumbered by an existing easement along the westem property boundary. 2. Submission of the application and fee for Preliminary Plat Approval. The preliminary map should contain the following revisions: Depict a 30' wide natural vegetated buffer on Lots 1 and 3 adjacent to Colony Road. On Lot 1 the natural buffer shall run for a distance of 320' east/west (less areas to locate the subsurface sanitary system as shown). On Lot 3 the natural buffer shall run for a distance of 255' east /west. The natural buffer shall be shown on the Preliminary Plat and be labeled "Natural Buffer~'. Depict a 100' non-disturbance/non-fertilization buffer landward from the boundary of the wetland area. In addition, include the following language in a draft covenants and restrictions to be submitted to the Planning Board: "Vegetation within this area shall remain in its natural state in perpetuity. Permitted activities within the buffer are limited to the removal of dead, diseased trees that are hazardous to life or property. Notwithstanding the above, the Non Disturbance/non-fertilization Vegetation Buffer Area may be supplemented with additional native vegetation subject to review and approval of the Southold Town Planning Board and Southold Town Trustees. The construction or placement of structures is prohibited. The cleadng of any kind is prohibited, except to establish a 4 foot wide unimproved, natural access path located within the 10 foot pedestrian access easement over Lot 2. Pursuant to Chapter 275 Wetlands and Shorelines, the access path must be reviewed by the Southold Town Trustees and other jurisdictional agencies." c. The title of the map to be amended is to read "Standard Subdivision of Colony Pond". Show the location of street trees pursuant to Section A108-45 of the Town Code. Provide the planting details, including the species and size at planting. 3. Submission of six (6) copies of the Preliminary Road and Drainage Plans. Southold Town Plannin.q Board Pa.qe Ei.qhteen September 13, 2010 4. Submission of a draft Bond Estimate. 5. Submission of a Draft Road and Maintenance Agreement for the 50'-wide right-of-way. 6. Submission of a Draft Open Space Easement pursuant to Section A106- 49(C) of the $outhold Town Code for the Open Space Area located on Lot 2. 7. LWRP Coastal Consistency Review by the Town of Southold. Submission of a permit or Letter of Non-Jurisdiction from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Southold Town Trustees for the proposed project. Submission of Draft Covenants and Restrictions containing the following clauses: a. Road and Maintenance Agreement language. b. There shall be no further subdivision of any of the lots on the approved subdivision map, in perpetuity. c. There shall be no changes to any of the lot lines without Planning Board approval. d. There shall be no storm water run-off resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots discharged into the wetlands or Hashamomuck Pond in any manner. e. There shall be no residential structures permitted on the Lot 2 Open Space Area. f. Pursuant to Chapter 236 Storm Water, Grading and Drainage Control Law of the Southold Town Code, all storm water shall be retained on- site. g. Pdor to any construction activity, the project will require a General Permit for the storm water run-off from construction activity (GP-02-01) administered by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation under Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. h. By this Declaration, future residents of the lots that compdse the subdivision are advised that the lots may be subject to the noise, dust and odors normally associated with agricultural activities pursuant to Article XXII, Farmland Bill of Rights, of the Southold Town Code. i. The Submittal of the Park and Playground Fee in the amount of $28,000 ($7,000 for each new lot created); and WHEREAS, on May 19, 2008, a copy of water sampling and test results for the above- referenced property completed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services on February 8, 2008 was forwarded to the Southold Town Planning Board for their review; and Southold Town Planning Board Page Nineteen September 13 2..,_~,~p_010 WHEREAS, the test results of the water sampling and testing for the above-referenced property completed on February 8, 2008 indicated that the test well or drinking water standards at the time of sampling were below allowable standards and, therefore, not potable; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 2008, a copy of the filed deed for the above-referenced property was submitted to the Southold Town Planning Board for their review; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2009, the Suffolk County Water Authority agreed to extend public water to 854 feet down Colony Pond Road to the above-referenced property; and WHEREAS, on January 22, 2010, the applicant submitted a petition to the Southold Town Board requesting that the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map be extended to allow for public water supply for the above-referenced property as the water on site of the above-referenced property was found not potable by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services; and WHEREAS, on June 3, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board received a second set of water sampling and test results completed by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services on May 14, 2010 indicating that the water supply and drinking water for the above-referenced property is not potable; and WHEREAS, on June 29, 2010, the Southold Town Board adopted Resolution 2010-478 entitled "A Local Law to Amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to the Colony Pond Subdivision in Southold"; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board received a request from the applicant to re-issue Conditional Sketch Approval previously granted on February 11, 2008 for the above-referenced property; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the above-referenced request to re-issue Conditional Sketch Approval for the above- referenced property to include an additional condition requiring the creation of one affordable housing lot as required by Southold Town Code §240-(B)(c)[1]; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby re-issues Conditional Sketch Approval originally granted on February 11, 2008 upon the map entitled "Road and Drainage Plan of Colony Pond", dated April 4, 2006 and last revised June 29, 2007, prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E., with the additional condition requirement as outlined in Southold Town Code 240(b)(c)[1]. Donald Wilcenski: Second. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Southold Town Plannin,q Board Pa.qe Twenty Se tember 13 2010 Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. Setting of Final Hearings: Aries Estates - This proposal is for a standard subdivision of an 11.4418-acre parcel into two lots, where Lot 1 totals 3.7667 acres, including 1.7229 acres of open space, and Lot 2 totals 7.6751 acres, including 4.6711 acres of open space, in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way which extends north from Kayleigh's Court in East Marion. SCTM#1000-22-3-2 Kenneth Edwards: I will offer the following resolution: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, October 18, 2010 at 6:05 p.m. for a Final Public Hearing at the Southold Town Hall regarding the map entitled "Final Plat for Standard Subdivision Shawn Tully" prepared by Howard W. Young, L.S. dated June 25, 2010. Donald Wilcenski: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. Scharf, Charles & Amy - This revised proposal is to transfer 48,211 sq. ft. from Lot 1 which totals 135,332 sq. ft. (SCTM#1000-81-3-25.1) to Lot 2 which totals 94,446 sq. ft. (SCTM#1000-81-3-26). As a result of this transfer, Lot 1 would be reduced in over-all area to 87,120 sq. ft. and Lot 2 would increase in over-all area to 142,657 sq. ft. in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located on Paradise Point Road in Southold. SCTM#1000-81-3-25.1 & 26 Joseph Townsend: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, October 18, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. for a Final Public Hearing at the Southold Town Hall regarding the map entitled "Map of Property At Bayview", prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, L.S., dated June 18, 2010. William Cremers: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Southold Town Plannin.q Board Pa.qe Twenty-One September !3, 2010 Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. SITE PLANS Set Hearings: MetroPCS NY, LLClSouthold Town Police Station - This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27- acre pamel w/o Peconic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located at 165 Peconic Lane in Peconic. SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Donald Wilcenski: Mr. Chairman, I will offer the following resolution: Be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, October 18, 2010 at 6:10 p.m. for a public headng at the Southold Town Hall regarding the special exception consideration and site plan, dated November 20, 2009, prepared by Luis Moglino R.A., for the above-referenced application. Kenneth Edwards: Second. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. MetroPCS, NY, LLC/Penny - This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna at a height of 75' to the outside of an existing 100' flag pole and install related equipment on the ground at the premises located on a 3.8-acre parcel 400' e/o Lipco Road in the LI Zoning District. The property is located at 12585 Sound Avenue in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 William Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I will offer the following: Be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, October 18, 2010 at 6:15 p.m. for a public hearing at the Southold Town Hall regarding the special exception consideration and site plan dated December 21, 2009 prepared by Luis Moglino, R.A., for the above-referenced application. Southold Town P annin.q Board Pa.qe Twenty-Two Se tember 13 2010 Kenneth Edwards: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Determinations - Negative Declarations: Southold Free Library - The request is for a 7,258 sq. ft. three-story addition on the e/s/o the existing library to have a total of 18,243 sq. ft. Also included as part of the site plan are two additional buildings on site--namely the library annex, 1,250 sq. ft., proposed to be re-located on site for office space and The Friends of the Library Building, 657 sq. ft., for retail space. The property is located in the Hamlet Business Zoning District on the n/s/o Main Street (through street - Traveler Street), approximately 190' w/o Beckwith Avenue in Southold. SCTM#1000-61-1-14, 15.1 & 15.2 Kenneth Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I will offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, this request is for a 7,258 sq. ft. three-story addition on the east side of the existing library to have a total of 18,243 sq. ft. Also included as part of the site plan are two additional buildings on site namely the library annex,1,250 sq. ft., proposed to be re-located on site for office space and The Friends of the Library building, 657 sq. ft., for retail space; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and, as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. William Cremers: Second the motion. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Southold Town Plannin.q Board Pa.qe Twenty-Three September Martin Sidor: Motion carries. APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Martin Sidor: We need a motion to approve the Planning Board minutes of the August 9, 2010 Regular Meeting. William Cremers: So moved. Donald Wilcenski: Second. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. Martin Sidor: Does anyone on the Board wish to put anything on the minutes? I need a motion for adjournment. Donald Wilcenski: So moved. William Cremers: Second. Martin Sidor: Motion made and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor?. Ayes. Martin Sidor: Motion carries. **************************************************** There being no further business to come before the meeting, it was ADJOURNED at 7:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~lph,~T~and~sc~bing Secretary Southold Town Plannin,q Board Paqe Twenty-Four Se tember 13 2010 Martin H. Sidor, Chair