The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-5964 James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 June 20,2007 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD The C.D. Reiters C/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Rd. Newark, Delaware 19711 RE: THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 750 OLD MAIN RD., SOUTHOLD SCTM#56-6-8.7 Dear Ms. Denson: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at their Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, June 20, 2007: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants the last One-Year Extension to Permit #5964, as issued on July 21,2004 and Amended on February 16, 2005. This is not an approval from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Ja sr~F. KinF~" President, Board of Trustees JFK:lms James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 June 21,2006 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Ms. Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 RE: THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 750 OLD MAIN RD., SOUTHOLD SCTM#56-6-8.7 Dear Ms. Denson: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at their Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, June 21,2006: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants a One-Year Extension to Permit #5964, as issued on July 21,2004, and amended on February 16, 2005. This is not an approval from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, President, ~oard of 2ees JFK:lms Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 March 7, 2005 BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Ms. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Rd. Newark, Delaware 19711 RE: OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 750 OLD MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 56-6-8.7 Dear Ms. Denson: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Wednesday February 16, 2005: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVE the Amendment to Permit # 5964 as follows: The turf area along the Main Road will remain; it will be required to be a non-fertilization, non- chemical area, within 100' of the water. No other turf on site. The French drains around the building will capture all runoff and replace the original requirement of gutters into drywells. French drains will be installed along the west side of the property to capture runoff from the parking lot, instead of regrading the parking lot. And all else as required on the addendum to Permit # 5964, and as depicted on the site plan approved by the Planning Department as surveyed by Joseph Fischetti and last dated February 18, 2005. This is not a determination from any other agency. If you have any questions, please call our office at (631) 765-1892. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:hct Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Jeri Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold Town Planning Board Date: February 17, 2005 Re: The Old Barge: SCTM#56-6-8.7 Site Plan The Board of Trustees has reviewed the site plan for the Old Barge. They would like to see additional French drains to capture water from the parking lot, running along the west side of the property. The lawn area along the Main Road will be required to be a non-fertilization, non- chemical area, because of the proximity to the creek. The applicant will be required to follow all the conditions of the Trustee permit approved on July 21,2004. Albert J. Krupski, Presiden~ James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Jeri Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold Town Planning Board Date: February 17, 2005 Re: The Old Barge: SCTM#56-6-8.7 Site Plan The Board of Trustees has reviewed the site plan for the Old Barge. They would like to see additional French drains to capture water from the parking lot, running along the west side of the property. The lawn area along the Main Road will be required to be a non-fertilization, non- chemical area, because of the proximity to the creek. The applicant will be required to follow ail the conditions of the Trustee permit approved on July 21, 2004. Albert J. Krupski, President James Kin~, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Pohwoda Peggy A. Dickereon Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE __ Pre-construction, hay bale line __ 1st day of construction ~ constructed __ Project complete, compliance inspection. Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK CAROL R. DENSON ISSUED TO ............................................ · ......................................................................................... 750 Old Main Rd Southold, NY 06-8fh?e State of New York, 1893; end Chapter 404 of Se ~ws of the State of New York 1952: and the Soufheld To*n Ordinance en- titled .'~E~ULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUC:~IN~ S IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and. the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL' OR OTHER MATERIALS~M LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS:.'?. and in eCcoedan~e with 'the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting hew o~ 3u1¥'. 21, · .~.0..0J, and in consideration of the sum of $....~5.0.,.Bll ...... Peld by Carol Denson ..................................... of .......... ~.~.~?].c~ ....................................................... N. Y. and ,ubje~t to Terms end C, cmditions lided on the reverse side .hereof, of Soufhold Town Trudees auihorlzes and permifs the following:. Wetland Permit to construct an upper level on the existin barge restaurant building with the f&llowing conditions: SEE ATTACHED ADDENDUM all' in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented · the odglnatlng application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. The said Board bf Trustees here- subserlhed by ~ malodtY of the said Board .as of this date. TERldS ,nd CONDmONS ~ p~ , Carol Denton · ~ ne 1184 Corner Ketnh Rd: M~w=r~: I~. ] Q711 N. Y~ ~ 'fl~t this Petmi~' should be t~-talned b~de~tn[tely, or as lan~ ~ the sam Petmlttee ~ ' the sm~me ot l~]ect ~nvolved, to pm~ evldmee to anyone eoncemed tlm smh- 5. Ti~tt I~ete w~H be no unreasonable tntetfetenee w~b mv~t~n as a reset of Ibc wade Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice~President A_~ti~ Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD ADDENDUM TO PERMIT # 5964 CAROLR. DENSON 750OLD MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NY SCTM#56~6~.7 Wetland permit to Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of CAROL R. DENSON to construct an upper level on the existing barge restaurant building with the following conditions: 1. No turf on site 2. Grade the parking lot away from the water 3. Gutters and dr/wells on the structure; keep all runoff out of the water 4. Cut Phragmites to 1' where it is choking out the Spartina alterniflora along the waters edge, as indicated on the survey 5. Keep the sand area between the parking lot and the bulkhead 6. Remove the 6 x 30 float from the marsh fringe 7. No excavation; second story will be put on pilings, And all as depicted on the survey prepared by Joseph Fischetti last dated April 9, 2004. Albert J. Kvupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD July 21,2004 John A. Costello Costello Marine Contracting Corp. 423 5~h Street Greenport, NY 11944 RE: CAROL R. DENSON: OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 750 OLD MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NY SCTM# 56-06-8.7 The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday July 21,2004 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, John Costello on behalf of CAROL R. DENSON applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated June 30, 2004 and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on July 21,2004, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of CAROL R. DENSON to construct an upper level on the existing barge restaurant building with the following conditions: 1. No turf on site 2. Grade the parking lot away from the water 3. Gutters and drywells on the structure; keep all runoff out of the water 4. Cut Phragmites to 1' where it is choking out the Spartina alterniflora along the waters edge, as indicated on the survey 5. Keep the sand area between the parking lot and the bulkhead 6. Remove the 6 x 30 float from the marsh fringe 7. No excavation; second story will be put on pilings, And all as depicted on the survey prepared by Joseph Fischetti last dated April 9, 2004. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/hct Albert J. Krupski President James King Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Sout~old, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Please be advised that your application dated (0 I~/,~ has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of ~ 13[IL~ and the following action was taken: (,~) Application Approved (see below) ( ) Application Denied (see below) ( ) Application Tabled (see below) If your application is approved as noted above, a permit fee is now due. Make check or money order payable to the Southold Town Trustees. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in the instruction sheet. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: SIGNED: PRESIDENT, BOARD OF TRUSTEES COSTELLO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION VENDOR ID: SOUTHOLDTO CHECK NO: 00022822 PAYEE: Southold Town Trustees MEMO: DATE: 22822 O8/O9/O4 ACCOUNT 6150 Permits ( AMOUNT 50.00 CHECK TOTAL: ********$50.00 7/15/04 Field Inspection 7/l 5/04 Field Inspection 7/15/04 Field Inspection 7/l 5/04 Field Inspection Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box I 179 Southold, New York I 1971-0959 CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Tuesday, July 13, 2004, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Don Wilder, seconded by Bill Cook, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS of the Wetland Permit application of CAROL R. DENSON to construct an upper level on the existing barge restaurant building. Located: 750 Old Main Rd., Southold. SCTM#56-6-8.7 The CAC recommends Approval of the application with the Condition the parking area is graded away from the water and into a re-charge basin and a berm is installed 1' higher than the parking area on the southwest side. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried LL TO: Jill Doherty, President Board of Town Trustees Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Carol R. Denson ~J.~ 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 (302) 239-0979 Email: crdenson~udel.edu DATE: RE: August3,2010 Request to reissue Permit # 5964 The Old Barge Restaurant, 750 Old Main Road, Southold SCTM#56-6-8.7 This letter is to request that Permit # 5964 issued by the Board of Town Trustees on July 21, 2004, and amended February 16, 2005, be considered for reissue. The permit expired July 2008. In the interim, we were unable to obtain the requisite permits from the NYSDEC before the Board of Town Trustees permit expired, because of drainage issues with the DEC. (DEC required a drainage strategy that was different than the one approved by the Planning Board). The issues have been resolved and the NYSDEC approved our revised drainage plan and issued a permit on January 19, 2010, (# 1-4738-01665/00003). As a result, the site plan initially submitted to the Board of Town Trustees has been modified in two important, environmentally enhanced ways, as noted below. The plans for the second floor addition to the building have not been changed and remain the same as those approved in Permit #5964 1. A French drain system will be installed throughout the existing parking lot. 2. Revegetation plan will be introduced along the upland side of the retaining wall. The Board's advice is appreciated on how to proceed with obtaining a reissued permit. The C. D. Reiters c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 (302) 239-0979 Fax: (302) 239-0979 Email: crdenson~udel.edu TO: FROM: DATE: James King, President TBoo;md oCff sToOutWhno 1T~u ate es Carol R. Denson~0 June 20, 2008 Permit Extension # 5964 The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM#56-6.8.7 This letter is to request an extension to the subject project issued July 21, 2004. Enclosed is the application fee in the amount of $50.00. Thank you. The C. D. Reiters c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 (302) 239-0979 Fax: (302) 234-2619 Email: crdenson~udel.edu TO: FROM: James King, President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold~/~~ Carol R. Denson DATE: May 8, 2007 Permit Extension # 5964 The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM#56-6.8.7 This letter is to request an extension to the subject project issued July 21, 2004. Enclosed is the application fee in the amount of $50.00. MAY - 8 2007 ,,IL~/ The C. D. Reiters c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 (302) 239-0979 Fax: (302) 234-2619 Email: crdenson~,udel.edu TO: FROM: James King, President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold C ol . DATE: June 12, 2006 Permit Extension # 5964 The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM#56-6.8.7 This letter is to request an extension to the subject project issued July 21, 2004. Enclosed is the application fee in the amount of $50.00. JUN 7 2 2006 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 15, 2005 Mrs. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: B0nr6 0f Trustees Proposed Amended Site Plan for The Old Barge, S, ;ond Floor Located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zone: M-II Marine II District Dear Mrs. Denson: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 14, 2005: The final public hearing was closed. WHEREAS, the applicant, Carol R. Denson, proposes the amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,397 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the M-II Zone; and WHEREAS, The C.D. Reiter Partnership is the owner of the property known as SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2003, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR), Part 617.6, performed a review of this unlisted action, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2004, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services approved the site plan prepared and certified by Robert Brown, dated November 5, 2003 and last revised April 9, 2004, under Reference Number C10-04-001; and The Old Barqe Second Floor - Paqe Two - 03/15/05 WHEREAS, on May 14, 2004, the New York State Department of Transportation reviewed the site plan and assigned the Case Number 04-123PP and indicated no Highway Work Permit is required and the Planning Board has accepted this recommendation; and WHEREAS, on August 3, 2004, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and approved the architectural drawings, associated site plan materials and the Planning Board has accepted this approval and determined it to be satisfactory; and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2005, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals granted Special Exception approval as described under Appeal Number 5626 and the Planning Board has accepted this approval; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2005, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed and certified the site plan for "Restaurant" use by Special Exception; and WHEREAS, on March 7, 2005, the Southold Town Trustees approved an amendment to Permit Number 5964, issued on July 21,2004, and the Planning Board has accepted this approval; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2005, the Southold Town Engineering Inspector reviewed and approved the proposed drainage with conditions and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation; and WHEREAS, on March 11,2005, the Southold Fire District recommended that fire protection is adequate and the Planning Board has accepted this recommendation; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, the following two items are incorporated and included in the site plan: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code requirements. 2. All signs shall meet Southold Town Zoning Codes and shall be subject to approval of the Southold Town Building Inspector; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore The Old Barqe, Second Floor - Pa.qe Three - 03/15/05 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared and certified by Robert I. Brown, Licensed Architect, dated November 5, 2003 and last revised February 18, 2005, and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the final site plans subject to a one year review from the date of issuance of the building permit. Enclosed please find one copy of the approved site plan for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairperson Enc. ccl Building Department Town Engineer Board of Trustees Zoning Board of Appeals Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Pnliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application --~and Permit Application ,,'~Major __ Waiver/Amendmenl/~_hao~s ~'Rece~vved Applica!ric~r~: --,~eceived Fee:$ I~.-~ ~5~'mpleted Application~0~ __Incomplete __SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted __Coordination:(date ser~t) ~,,CAC Referral Sent: ~l ~_..~ate o f Inspection: __Receipt of CAC Report: __Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: ~nlic Hearing Held: Resolution: Minor Seuthold Town Board o! Trustees NameofApplicant d;~l~O(_~ (~, ~-~/O-~o]XJ Suffolk CountyTax Map Nmber: 1000 - ~-0~- ~ ~ Prope~y~cation: ~ ~ ~1~ ~OI CO0~i~, ~0{~'~% q~Oi~ ~rovide L~QO Pole ~, ~s{~ce to cross s~eet~, ~d )ocation) (If applicable) Address: ~ llQqq Phone: ¢~[- Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square lea): Area Zoning: Previous use of property: ~-~Ct:~F73r(J/'~q'fO ["- Intended use of property: Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency DoC ~. o~-I~ P Date __ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? y No__ Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): E~srf~ ho/l, GM £/L.E'- IPROJECT I0 NUIdBER I17.~0 SEQ . , EHORT ENVIRONMENTAL A88E88~ENT FORM PART ~PROJE~ INFORMATION fro ~'complet~ by ~pll~nt or PmJ~ S~r) 1, ~PUCA~/SPOH~R 3l PROJECT LO~TION: 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: D New O Expan~on D Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIEE PROJECT BRIEFLY:. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: 8. Will PROPOSED ACtiON COMPLY WITH ~'~u~-ING ZONING OR OTHER EXJSTING LAND USE RF~'TRIGT~ONS? [3 No If n~, ~..rlbe bdefty $. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT~ 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUN~ NOW O~ ULTIMAll~Y FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTA~ AGENCY (FeOerit. State or S TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE '* OVER · PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. ~q~ AGTION EXGEF~ AHY TYPE I ~LD IH 4~ NYGRR ~ SlTA? C7 Other imp&c/~ (including changes in ule OI llthet quantity ~, type M ~'~e~y)? O. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPA~I' ON THE ENVIR~'."_::,%TA~, ~HaJ~ACI~Rii¥i~ T~AT CAUeEO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEA? O Yes I'1 NO E. I$ THERE, OR IS THERE UKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSy RELA1T;D TO ~'~l tatr~,L ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? D ¥li r"l No I! yes. explain b~iefly PART II--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (TO bi oempleted by Agenw) I~$I$IICl in GOnneCfiO~ WWl I~ (I) IIE~ ~'e" I~ ~' I~); (b)IXI~ajMjEV Of h~'''w~ ....... r ............ ~iS bOX if yOU have dentifi~ potentially large an~ significant adverse impacts which may occur. Then proceec~ clirectly !o Ihe FULL FAF and/or prepa~'e i positive declaration. [] Check this box if you h~ave determined, based on the information and anaJyais above and any supporting documentation, t~at the proposed action WILL NOT result In any llgnlflc~nt adverse envir~)nmental impacts AND provide on a~lachmems as necessary, Ihe reasons suppo~ing thil delermination: N~me OI Ll&d Agency Pnnl O~ Ty~31~ N~me ol RelponliDil Officer in Lead COSTELLO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING · JETTIES · BULKHEADING ° STEEL & WOOD PILING · FLOATS 423 FIFTH STREET ,, P.O. BOX 2124 · GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944, (631) 477-1199/477-1393/477-06~2 · FAX (631) 477-00o5 AUTHOa~ZATION FORYl BAasiness/Property Name. ~ do hereby give Costello Marine Contracting Corp. the authority to act as agent in my behalf in applying for all of the necessary permits for work to be completed at my above referenced property. Signature Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York DEPOS-ES~AND AFFIRMS 24HAT HE/SHE'iS ~fHE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF mS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISiNG UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. "No,~ry Public Veronica F. Cidone Notary Public, State of New York No: 52-4661406 .' ' signature Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires Dec.31 ~rd of Trustees Applicati~ AbTUORI ZA'££ ON (where the applicant is not the owner) residing at //(~'d/ /__.~/'~/t//¢,7~ o~er of property) (mailing ad. ess) ~~ }~ [~7'~ d° hereby a~th°rize~~' ~~O ( Agent to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. (Owner' s signature) APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics nrohibits conflicts of interest on the vart of town 0fficess and emnlovees. Thc nuroose of this form is to nrovide information which can alert the town of oossible conflicts of interast and allow it to take whatever action is (Last namc,~rst namc,~iddle iilitial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone CoaYad Erosion Approval of plat Mooting Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If "Other", name the activity.). Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of ~outhold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or bu~inass interest. "Business interest'? means a business, including a partoership, in which the town officer or employee has oven a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO lfyou answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title Or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent~representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or Child is (ebeck all that apply): __.A) thc owner of greater than 5% oftbe shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a coq)oration); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee oftbe applicant; Or __.D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS 1 L ~A 35 ,33 3/ 30 2O Gong FI~. EEDTAURAN7 ( BARGE cO~G PIPE AT 3'-0" I~LOW' GRADE BURIED IN GRAVI~L. GPN~ASE TRAP J 150 L.ff. x IO'Wx4.5'D = g,750 C.F. × .4 = E5 NEW ROOF 1~4005.E.x.i7x / = 238C.F. TOTAL REQUIP-J~D -- 238 C.F. NEW FP~ENCH D~,AIN 35G L.P. x3, Dx .5'W= I,G02 C.F.x.4 = EST.( GR.055 SQUARE FC ~IRST FLOOR SECOND ?LQQR TOTAL ?ARKJNG: RESTAURANT I I 9 5EAST~ ACCE550Ry RETAIL EMPL( ADDITIONAL FOP-, RETAIL: TOTAL P--EQUIRED: TOTAL PROVIDED: OR.: I PER I OO PROVIDED: JOSEPH FISCHE PP-,.OFEDSIONAL 1725 HC)I~AI~T ~ C. D. Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 (302) 239-0979 Fax: (302) 234-2619 Email: crdenson~udel.edu JUN - 1 2C04 Board of Trustees TO: FROM: Albert J. Kmpski, Jr., President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Carol R. Denson ~ ~F'~'~ DATE: May 24, 2004 The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM#56-6.8.7 This is in response to your letter addressed to Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, dated April 19, 2004, and to request an extension for the wavier granted in your letter dated April 23, 1998 for the subject site plan. In 1998 the Southold Town Board of Trustecs issued a waiver to add a mezzanine (upper level) to the existing Old Barge Restaurant. A copy of that letter is enclosed. I have been actively working since that time to obtain a building permit to proceed with the project. Regrettably, I have encountered a number of delays and have not been able to move forward in a timely manner. When I began working on this project, I worked with an architect from Delaware whose work I know well, and who is also licensed in New York. I am now working with a local North Fork architect, a local structural engineer, and a local marine contractor to develop a building plan that is in compliance with the new codes. Consequently, an amended site plan has been submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department that includes a modification to the shape of the upper level. Also the seating capacity of the structure has been reduced by one (1) seat, a small retail space has been created in the lower level, and two (2) parking spaces have been added. All proposed changes remain within the same footprint of the existing structure. Permits obtained from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the DEC are current. Thank you for your assistance and I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. 06~'02'04 WED 09:28 FAX 6317651366 Sou~hold Town Accounting ~ 0 01 1~ Com~ Ketch Road New~ Delaw~e 19711 (302) 239-~ Fax: (302) 234-2619 Ema/h erdenson(a~udel.edu · Bo , o ,ow Tom ofSouthotd ~.---- ~ , _t '--'U_ _.i.~ -o',,,-- This is ia response to your letler addressed to Brahe SA~org Senior Site Plan Revmwer, dated April 19, 200~1, and to request an extension fo(the wavier granled in your dated April 23, 199[ for the subject site plan.. . . In 1998 the Southold Town Board of Trustees issued a waiver'i~add a me~Tanine (upper level) to the ex/sfin~ Old Barge Restaurant. A copy of that letter is enclosed. I have been actively working si~ :e that time to obtain a building permit to proceed vatb the project. Regrettably, I have, a¢ountered a number of delays and have not been able to move forward in a timely :~ harmer. Whea I began working on this project, I worked with an architect from Delaware whose work I know well, a ~d who is also licensed in New York. I am now working with a local North Fork archite¢l, a local structural engineer, and a local marine contractor to develop a buildmxg plan that s ia compliance with the new codes. Consequently, an amended site plan has been submit,led to the Southold Town Planning Depmtment that includes a modification to thc ~ tape of the upper level. Also the seating capacity of the structure ~ffa~ ~o~c~t ~muved by one (1) ~0at, a small retail space has been created in the lower level, and two (2) parking spaces have been added. All proposed changes remain within the same footp' o ~ eons ~5- 02- 04 Permits obtained fro m the StaTolk County Depamnent of Health San, ices and the DEC are current Tl~mk you for yot~ assistance and t look forward m hearing from you in the near future. 06,'02,'04 WED 09:29 FAX 6317651366 Southold Town Accounting ~]092 Albert J. Krups]d, President James King, Vice-President Hem? Sm{ih Artie Foster Ken Poliweda Town Hall 53095 Mahx Road P.O. Box 1179 Southokl, New York ~_1971 Telephone (516) 765-1882 Fax (516) 765~1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 1998 Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ket~c Road Newark, D~ 197i~ RE: Barge Rest, SCT~ #56-6~8.5 Dear Mrs;. Densor, The following action was taken by the Southold To~rn Trustees on Wednesday, Apri3 22, 1998, at their Regular Meeting: RESOLVED, that ~he Southold Town Board of Trustees grant a Waiver to add a mezzanine area on top of existing Barge Restaurant, chal:~ging roof line, but staying in the same foot print. ~noff wJ 11 be directed to existing drywells. Plans dated as received April 10, 1998. Located Rt. 25, Southold. ~owever,. this approval does not constitute approvals from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Albert J. Krups:.~i, Jr. president, Boar. 1 of Trustees AJK/Jmd cc. Bldg. Dept3i~ 18:23 RECEIVED FROM:~317651365 P.02 06,.'~13.'04 THU 08:05 FAX 6317651366 Southold Town Accounting ~(1(~1 Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vic~President Ax-tie Foster Ken Poli~da Peggy ~ Dickereen Town Hall 63095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, iNew York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765.1892 Fmx (631) 766~1866 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOVFN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: DALE: RE: Brun,,) Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Albe~l J. Krupski, Jr., President Boan~ of Trustees Apdl t9, 2004 The ()Id Barge Second Floor SCT[.4#56-6~8.7 I-he Southold Tow~ Board of Trustees reviewed the application submitted by The Old Ban§e and determined the alterations to the existing restaurant to be within the Wetland jurisdi?tion under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code, and therefore a permit Is required. If you require any 1: urther information, please don't hesitate to contact the office. 06-03-04 09:00 RECEIVED FROM: 5317651366 P.01 Na~ 24 04 11:16a C OEH$ON (302) 234-2G19 p. 1 F A C S I M I L E TO: Name: Fax #: Pages: FROM: Nalil¢: Fax #: Da~e/Tim¢: MESSAGE: I-JF= ~AX Ma~ 24 04 ll:16a C D£M$ON (302) C. D, Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 (302) 239-0979 Fax: (302) 234-2619 Email: crdenson~udel.edu TO: FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Carol R. Denson ~{L/.S.~0 ~~ DATE: May 24, 2004 The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM#56-6.8.7 This is in response to your letter addressed to Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, dated April 19, 2004, and to request an extension for the wavier granted in your letter dated April 23, 1998 for the subject site plan. In 1998 the Southold Town Board of Trustees issued a waiver to add a mezzanine (upper level) to the existing Old Barge Restaurant. A copy of that letter is enclosed. I have been actively working since that time to obtain a building permit to proceed with the project. Regrettably, I have encountered a number of delays and have not been able to move forward in a timely manner. When I began working on this project, I worked with an architect from Delaware whose work I know well, and who is also licensed in New York. I am now working with a local North Fork architect, a local structural engineer, and a local marine contractor to develop a building plan that is in compliance with the new codes. Consequently, an amended site plan has been submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department that includes a modification to the shape of the upper level. Also the seating capacity of the structure has been reduced by one (1) seat, a small retail space has been created in the lower level, and two (2) parking spaces have been added. All proposed changes remain within the same footprint of the existing structure. Permits obtained from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the DEC are current. Thank you for your assistance and I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. ~a~ 24 O~ 11: 1Sa C DE~SO~ (~02) 23~-2619 Alber~ J. Krupsld, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith A~cie Foater Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 .qouthold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1882 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 1998 Carol Denson 1184 Corner Kethc Road Newark, DE 19711 RE: Barge Rest. SCTM #56-6-8.5 Dear Mrs. Denson, The following action was taken by the Southold Town Trustees on Wednesday, April 22, 1998, at their Regular Meeting: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grant a Waiver to add a mezzanine area on top of existing Barge Restaurant, changing roof line, but staying in the same foot print. Runoff will be directed to existing dr~rdalls. Plans dated as received April 10, 1998. Located Rt. 25, Southold. However, this approval does not constitute approvals from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/jmd cc. Bldg. Dept,~'/ All~ert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees April 19, 2004 The Old Barge Second Floor SCTM#56-6-8.7 The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the application submitted by The Old Barge and determined the alterations to the existing restaurant to be within the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code, and therefore a permit is required. If you require any further information, please don't hesitate to contact the office. ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR November 10, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFIC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 NOV i 4 ~oard of Trustees The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: The Old Barge Second Floor 750 Old Main Road Southold, N.Y. SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7, Zone: Mil Marine II District Requested Action: The proposed action involves an amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acres pamel in the Mil Zone. The site plan proposes a 119 seat restaurant and approximately 363 sq. ft. of retail store. The existing lot coverage is 10.0% and will be maintained. The site is located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold. SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938, × 229 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: x This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other (see comments below) Comments: The site is currently in use as a restaurant. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr, Chairman CC: Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Building Department $outhold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority *Suffolk County Planning Department *Maps are enclosed for your review 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to he(p applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it (s a potentially*large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: if any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION ,OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of FAF completed ior this project: I I Part1 LJ Part2 I IPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF {Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in ar~y large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant e~fect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Location of Acfion (include Street Address, Municipality and County) NameofApplicant/Sponsor ~'~_~ ~o ~)~:/~/'.~o~J~ Address City / PO Buslpess Telephone Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO State Z pCode {¢?11 State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 · Ple'as~e Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physica~ setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Forest ~ Agriculture [] Other []Residential (suburban) [] Rural (non-farm) Tote acreega of project area: / ¢¢ cres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland {Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural {Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland {Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated {Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other {Indicate type) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION ,~' acres ~"'~ acres acres acres acres acres .~. acres ,~)~,~ acres acres acres 9. 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area7 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: r'-'l~,,~ll drained _~l~% of site [] Moderately well drained__% of site. I_V IPoorly drained [~O % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4, Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? r"] Yes [~No a, What is depth to bedrock (in feet) ~ [l~O~iG[~,~r~ 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~0-10%/'~20 % ~10-15% % ~ 15% or greater__.% 6. Is project substantial~ontiguous to, o~ontain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? L~ Yes !/~ No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? N Yes [~o What is the depth of the water table7 ~ ~ (in feet) / Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~Yes E~No E~Yes [] No Page 3 of 21 · 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations7 Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? yes, explain; 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community7 ~'l~e'es 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 ' 1 7. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~es [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~YYes [] No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes 16. Is the site located in an agricultural district, certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes ~ 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 r~Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes7 B. 1. Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). f. g. h. DYes C~o Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: /,~"~J~acres. Project acreage to be developed: ~acres initially; ~. ~'~J~ acres ultimately. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. Length of project, in miles: ,., (if appropriate) If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. /'~ % Number of off-street parking space~ exmt~ng ; proposed Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)7 If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Initially Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ~-~,~'! height; ~ f width; ~fO f length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ~,~'"/,'~'~") ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? ~) tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes []No ~ a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being rec(aimed? 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~;) acres. Page 5 of 21 ,5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by thi~ project? r~Yes ['~o 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: &:~ months, (including demolition) 7. If multi*phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~ Yes ~ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction7 r~ Yes [~o 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~,~ ; after project is complete J~0 C~'~,~ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~) 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ['"] Yes ~'~o If yes, explain: 12 Is surface liquid waste disposal involved7 J ~Yes LJ~o a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [~es [---] No Type 1 3. 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~ Yes r"~o If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain;) J"~es []No · ,- 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ,~Yes ~ a. If yes, what is the amount per monthT__tons ~ C~.~ ll~ b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? r~Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ~ur/,J4~) ~r~ ~ ~,~, ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill7 r~Yes Page 6 of 21 · e. 'If ?es, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes r~o a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ years., 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r'"'lYes C~No 19. Willprojectroutinelyproduce°d°rs(m°rethan°neh°urperday)? r-'~Yesr'~N° 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? r~Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? r~ Yes ~1"1~o [f yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity J~ gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. ~' 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~ Yes If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board Type ~Yes Submittal Dote City, Town, Village Planning Board ~es ~'~ No City, Town Zoning Board DYes [~No City, County Health Department ~'Yes D No Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies ~"~ Yes [~No State Agencies [~es [] No Federal Agencies [] Yes r~ No c. zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~es ~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan [~ite plan [] Special use permit [] Resource management plan r~ Subdivision MOther Page 8 of 21 2. 'What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is tho proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning7 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~es [] No What are the predominant land use(s) and zon!~g classifications within a ~A mile radius of proposed action? Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Wifl proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [~es [] No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ~Yes L_J No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associate~.t with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the beat of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Signature If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an impact wil{ be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at fudher. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? .o [] yes [] Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. [] [] []Yes r-=l No [] [] I-lyes I'"1.o [] [] DYes []No [] [] []Yes rn.o [] [] I-lyes I"t.o [] [] DYes [].o Page 11 of 21 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impacl: Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land farms found on the site? (i,e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) r"l,O []YES Specific land forms: Impact on Water [] [] Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) r--]NO r-~ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. r~Yes r-'~ No []Yes r~No r~Yes r']No [] [] []Yes r~No [] [] []Yes r'"] No Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water [] [] body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] [] Other impacts: [] [] Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing er new body of water? DNo DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 1 0% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of LJ [] water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: [] [] ]Yes r'-] No ]Yes [] No []Yes [-'"{No ]Yes []No I"] es []No DYes I-q"o Page 12 of 21 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? F×aroplss that would apply to column 2 Proposed Actioa will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a $ourcs of water that does not have approval to ssr~e proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed. Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or o, ther discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that th~ere will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage ol~ petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates comroercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes ~No DYes []No r~Yes ~No CYes r~No ~]Yes []-] No [-"]Yes []No D-]Yes [~]No r-]Yes ['"'~ No r--~ Yes r~No r-]Yes r~No [-'~ Yes ~No ~es [] No Page 13 of 21 1 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? r--I.o Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns, Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: , IMPACT ON AIR Will Proposed Action affect air quality? Example,s that would apply to column 2 P[cposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: IMP^C,O. PU,.,s *.lW,-s 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. [] [] ]Yes ~No []Yes ~No ~Yes ~No r~Yes r'~No r'~Yes r~No I [] []Yes [~]No [] I--IYee 17'1.o [] I--Ives ~.o [] r~Yes r-"l No [] []Yes r'~No I-1 []Yes ~.o [] D~- E]No Page 14 of 21 Removal of any podion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. 1 Small to Moderate Impact Other impacts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident [] or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of [] mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: [] Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change E~Yes [~No r~Yes r'~No [] []Yes r~No [] r"lYes I No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. [] r'~ Yes []No [] []Yes ~No [] r-"l Yes r'-'l No Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users ot aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOLIRCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Yes ~No DYes ~No r'"l Yes J"~ No I~Yes [] No ]Yes [] No ]Yes r~No ,, I [] [] DYes r"l .o [] [] DYes I--'1 No [] [] DYes r--lNo Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: 1 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Yes r~No ]--']Yes ['-"~ No E~Yes r~No [~Yes r-'] No 14. IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA! established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: I--I es Yes r No Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes [ No Page 17of21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [].o [] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result In major traffic problems. Other impacts: I 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? I-l.o I--lYES Examples theft would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of/~lny form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: I NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: Page 18 of 21 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change ]Yes [] No DYes []No r'lYes [].o []Yes [] No []Yes []No []Yes [] No []Yes r-JNo []Yes []No []Yes •No DYes OYes •No 1 Smallto Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial et "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: I IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAC'rER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ]Yes r"'] No r'~Yes r'~No [-=]Yes r'~No I-lyes I--INo ]Yes []No []Yes []Yes Page 19 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more i~pact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the [mpact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imporlant. To answer the question of importance, consider: ! The probability of the impact occurring ! The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value ! Whether the impact can or will be controlled ~ The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from local heeds and goals ! Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 ~! PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR ' P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant December 8, 2003 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prei~ared. Name of Action: The Old Barge, Second Floor SCTM#: 1000-56-6-8.7 Location: The site is located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive, on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold. SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: The proposed action involves an amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the Mil Zone. The site plan proposes a 119 seat restaurant and approximately 363 sq. ft. of retail store. The existing lot coverage is 10.0% and will be maintained. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. SEQR Negative Declaration - Paqe Two There has not been any correspondence received from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, Southold Town Building Department, Southold Town Board, Southold Town Board of Trustees, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, or the Suffolk County Department of Public Works in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from these agencies. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Water Authority Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation responded on November 14, 2003 and has no objection to the Town of Southoid Planning Board Office assuming lead agency status for this action. The New York State Department of Transportation responded on November 17, 2003 and has no objection to the Planning Board's wishes to assume SEQR lead agency status. The Suffolk County Planning Commission responded on November 28, 2003 and has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency. The Departmer~t'of Health Services Office responded on December 9, 2003 and has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. The department wishes, however, to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Address: Southold Town Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 (x 229) cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1882 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 1998 Carol Denson 1184 Corner Kethc Road Newark, DE 19711 RE: Barge Rest. SCTM #56-6-8.5 Dear Mrs. Denson, The following action was taken by the Southold Town Trustees on Wednesday, April 22, 1998, at their Regular Meeting: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grant a Waiver to add a mezzanine area on top of existing Barge Restaurant, changing roof line, but staying in the same foot print. Runoff will be directed to existing drywells. Plans dated as received April 10, 1998. Located Rt. 25, Southold. However, this approval does not constitute approvals from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/Jmd cc. Bldg. Dept.[~ OLD MAIN ROAD Z 42 · 41 40 39 3~ 37 3G 35 34 27 2G 24¸ 25 24 L EDGE OF CONG. PAVEMENT /2 II I0 7 ~ 3 2 JANDtC,~ IANDICA~ 25.0' 5 24< CONC G 5G5°5 2'O0"W TIE LINE MILL CREEK I 2 3 4 5 G 7 6 9 I0 II 12 13 14 15 t KEY MAP 50UTHOLD, N.Y. ?S,¢.. ZS ~ /./~'/ PECONIC DAY , ~ ~LR ~ ~" oPOLE ...... OT ~ ~ / / ~ .~ EX[STINO LAWN/( " , LOT I 2 (SEPARATE TITLE) \ \ \ \ \ BUTION SEFq'IC TANK 7 51TE , -- EXISTING MANHOL~ W/PUMP :PLAN ~00~ 0 ~ NIP \ EXISTING RESTAURANT (DRY STORE) .qCAt. E: I''= 20~ 0" SEPTIC SYSIEM LOCATION5 BASED ON AS BUILT 5K2ETCIqE5 PROVIDED BY PECONIC 5URVEYOP-~. SANITARY DEDIGN CALCULA]' 51 ?, DESIGN FLOW CAPACITY 5AN1TARY KI1 CflEN TOTAL PARKING: LOT I 9 \ ¢\vv j bOARD OF TRUSTEES ~SOUTHOLD THE OLD BARGE RF~TAUP-.ANT AT AR~HAMOMAQUE TOWN OF $OUTIflOLD SUFFOLK COUN1~', N.Y AUG,OG, 1998 LOT COVERAGE 10% LANDSCAPED G% RIDE DISTRICT 5 , ' IT I$ A VIOLATION OF THE '" U~ILESR ACTING DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DRAWING IN ANY WAY. ANY AUTHORIZED ALTERATIOB MUST BE NOTED, SEALED, AND DESCRIBED IN ACCORDANCE WiTH THE LAW. JOSEPH FISCHETTI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEE?. 1725 HOBART KD. 50UTHOLD, iq.Y. 6.3 I -765-2954 02003 TIdE OLD BARGE REDTAU ~%qhlT RT. 25 50UTHOLD, H.Y. ADDITION SITE PLAN ISSUE