Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Suffolk County Water Authority - Brown's Hill Rd
Jill M.Doherty, President �OF SOUj Town Hall Annex James F. King,Vice-President �O� �� 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen [ # Southold,New York 11971-0959 Bob Ghosio,Jr. coo Q John Bredemeyer Telephone(631) 765-1892 �O � Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 18, 2010 Mr. Timothy Hopkins General Counsel Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Hwy. Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 RE: SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY ROUTE 25, EAST MARION TO BROWN'S HILL RD., ORIENT Dear Mr. Hopkins: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wed., August 18, 2010 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Timothy Hopkins on behalf of SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance, application dated June 25, 2010, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the application be found Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS„a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on July 21, 2010, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, 2 • • WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the project, as applied for, does not comply with the application requirements set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, specifically with Chapter 275-6 (11) Documentary proof of permits that have been applied for, are pending, and have been granted, including but not limited to NYSDEC, Suffolk County Health Dept. USACOE, and, WHEREAS, A Local Law to Amend the Town of Southold water supply plan map extending a water main to the Brown's Hills subdivision in Orient was defeated by the Town Board on April 20, 2010, Resolution #2010-331, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project, as applied for, will have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the foregoing reasons, the Board of Trustees DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the application of SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY for the installation of a water transmission main in road bed of Route 25, as applied for. This is not a determination from any other agency. Very truly yours, I M. Doherty, President oard of Trustees JMD/Ims RESOLUTION 2010-3310 DEFEATED DOC ID: 5881 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 2010-331 WAS DEFEATED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON APRIL 20, 2010: WHEREAS there has been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, on the 23rd day of February 2010, a Local Law entitled"A LOCAL LAW TO AMEND THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WATER SUPPLY PLAN MAP EXTENDING A WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN TO THE BROWNS HILLS SUBDIVISION IN ORIENT" and WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold held a public hearing on the aforesaid Local Law at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, now therefor be it RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby ENACTS the proposed local law entitled, "A LOCAL LAW TO AMEND THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WATER SUPPLY PLAN MAP EXTENDING A WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN TO THE BROWNS HILLS SUBDIVISION IN ORIENT" reads as follows: LOCAL LAW NO. of 2010 A Local Law entitled, "A Local Law to Amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Mai) Extendin¢ a Water Transmission Main to the Browns Hills Subdivision in Orient ". BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows: Section 1. Legislative Intent. This Local Law proposes to amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Historically, the Water Supply Plan Map reflects the physical changes in the water supply network since 2000. The Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services have represented to the Town that the groundwater quality of existing wells supplying the Browns Hills area are inadequate and pose a significant concern that requires the extension of public water to the area. The extension of the transmission main is intended to supply existing development only and is not intended to result in additional development pressure in the area. Section 2. Enactment. Based on the goals of the Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services to provide safe drinking water to the Browns Hills Subdivision, and upon our consideration of the recommendation of the Suffolk County Water Authority and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, the environmental consultant retained by the Town and Resolution 2010-331 • Oard Meeting of April 20, 2010 the public comments taken at the public hearing, we hereby amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Section 3. The Southold Water Supply Plan Map as adopted by Resolution No. 31 on June 20, 2000 by the Town Board, and most recently amended by Resolution No. 2007-603, is hereby amended to reflect the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or part of this Local Law shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the judgment shall not affect the validity of this law as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 5. Effective Date. This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State as provided by law. �,�f� Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk RESULT: DEFEATED 10 TO 61 MOVER: Christopher Talbot, Councilman SECONDER:Vincent Orlando, Councilman NAYS: Ruland, Orlando, Talbot, Krupski Jr., Evans, Russell Updated: 4/20/2010 2:53 PM by Lynda Rudder Page 2 df!l7l Southold Town Trustee John Bredemeyer Disclosure Statement: July 21, 2010 Whereas the Suffolk County Water Authority has made application to the Southold Town Trustees for a Wetland Permit Under Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, with a public hearing scheduled for this date, I am compelled to disclose the following information about my employment with Suffolk County so it is clear that I have no conflicts of interest: 1. I am a Public Health Sanitarian, employed by the Suffolk County Health Department in the Office of Ecology's Bureau of Marine Resources. 2. My work predominantly encompasses regulation of permitted bathing beaches under the NYS Sanitary Code as well as water sampling and associated field and laboratory studies under the Peconic Estuary and Beach Act Programs. 3. My work assignment in the County Health Department's Office of Ecology/Bureau of Marine Resources does not entail any regulatory or enforcement effort directed at the Suffolk County Water Authority. 4. My work assignment in the County Health Department's Office of Ecology/Bureau of Marine Resources does not entail any regulatory or enforcement activities relating to Public or Private Drinking Water Supplies. 5. My work assignment in the County Health Department's Office of Ecology/Bureau of Marine Resources does not entail development of Public Policy, Rules or Regulations. 6. Unrelated to this application by the Suffolk County Water Authority for a Southold Town Wetlands Permit, is my pending retirement. I expect to be off the County Health Department payroll in less than a month. 7. 1 am not seeking or contemplating post-retirement employment with the Suffolk County Water Authority or related entities. j41 ohn M. Bred eyer III, Tru ee CC: file 0 FO(/-c Peter Young,Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 W_P_P Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 '! Fax(631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., July 14, 2010, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Doug Hardy, seconded by Audrey Horton, to TABLE the Wetland Permit application of SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY for the installation of a water transmission main in road bed of Route 25. Located: Route 25, East Marion to Browns Hill Rd., Orient Inspected by: Doug Hardy The CAC Tables the application and recommends the Board of Trustees require an environmental impact statement to include special consideration to the impact of water levels in the subject areas and what the importation of an unknown volume of water would have on the water table and potential run-off of waste water. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried Jill M.Doherty,President �SUFFQ(,�Q0 P.O. Box 1179 James F.King,Vice-President Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen y Telephone(631)765-1892 Bob Ghosio,Jr. Fax(631)765-6641 John Bredemeyer Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY requests a Wetland Permit for the installation of a water transmission main in road bed of Route 25. Located: Route 25, East Marion to Browns Hill Rd., Orient Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 _Chapt. 111 _other Type of Application: Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment _Administrative_Emergency_ —Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: J.King _J.Doherty_J. Bredemeyer_D. Bergen_ B.Ghosio, D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: PERM."'(5/09) •'E OF NEW,YORK.DEPARTMENT OF TRAORTATION - HIGWAkY WORK PERMIT 10-09-0474 Permit Fee: $ Permit hp,: Q — Q 4 7 4 Insurance Fee: $ No,: Total Received: $ 0r 'P - 06/01/2011 Explr6?n Date: Check or M.O.No.: WAIV113 83a� SH No.: / Deposit Rec.for$ 0.00 Check or M.O..No.., Dated: 0.00 *Permittee: t of Work Performed In the State Right-of-Way$ ,., Uor SLWB .. = . "� . . '. "Chan'"tale to Bgna'No.: . Q00AI60 SI . NSF'' ,.,1��1lIY- "' r Unde m on File: 1769-^ p. .,_.., . att., T'[!i #IS Billing Address: (complete if differgnt from above) Retum of Deposit Made Payable to: (complete)f different from Permittee) r � Under the provisions of the Highway Law or Vehicle.&TrafficLaw,permission is hereby granted.to the permittee.to: To excavate 6 restore the Roo on the n1sle NY 25 betv"n NNs 1692-1426 to install 17L44' of la' diameter DIP 6 other incidental work as per attached plane 6 specifications. All work shall be to the satisfactioe of the Resident En4in eer - SEE ATTACKED SPECIAL CONDIT44NS. All work shall be dope in accordance with opproysil.plaRs or AUBE. KIPT shall be the responsibility of the pexelittee until'collplotion of all work, etc. THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH.THE NATIONAL MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND THE NYS SUPPLEMENT.ANYONE WORKING WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL WEAR HIGH-VISIBILITY APPAREL MEETING THE ANSI 107-2004 CLASS II STANDARDS AND A HARD HAT. County- SUFFOLK SOUTHOLD Municipality- 25 Route#- as set forth and represented in the attached application at the particular location or area, or over the routes as stated therein,if required;and pursuant to the conditions and regulations general or special,and methods of performing work, if any; all of which are set forth in the application and form of this permit. Dated at: HAUPPAU6E, N.Y. Commissioner of Trans lion Date SignEW112/2810 EU6ENE SMITH By IMPORTANT THIS PERMIT,WITH APPLICATION AND DRAWING(OR COPIES THEREOF)�Tr4CHE4HR>rt BF PIED IN THE HANDS OF THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE ANY WORK BEGINS. THE HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. BEFORE WORK IS STARTED AND UPON ITS COMPLETION,THEI�RMITTI; AB$OLURY MUST NOTIFY Tog RESIDENT ENGINEER, KEVIN NATTKAEI 1m CBUNTf AN.ISO (531)727-1731 'RIVERHEAD, NEV YORK 119@1 UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AUTHORIZED,THE FOLLOWING WILL BE COMPLETED,$QNED BY THE PERMITTEE AND DELIVERED TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. Work authorized by this permit has been completed. Refund of deposit or return/release of bond is requested. DATE PERMITTEE AUTHORIZEDAGENT(if Any) Work authorized by this permit has been satisfactorily completed and is accepted. Reverse side of this form must be completed. ❑ Refund of Deposit is authorized ❑ Return of Bond is authorized ❑ Mailing address of refund has been verified. ❑ Amount charged against Bond may be released If different,list new address below, ❑ Retain Bond for future permits ❑ Forfeit of Guarantee Deposit,is.authorized ❑ Other DATE RESIDENT ENGINEER - The Regional Office will forward this form to the Main Office with the appropriate box checked. ❑ Permit closed ❑ Bondretumed/released 2 �� ❑ Refund of Guarantee Deposit on this permit is authorized ❑ Forfeit Guarantee Deposit to NY§DQT ❑ Other DATE ,REGIQO.ALTFI .ENI;INqI R. The issuing authority reserves the dghtto,suspend or rev4tii ftKls permit at its disCro#prt withhQvt.e h R tt1a rteL t f nM(Igg cause, either before or.duringthaoratfans`.RNtJ}otixed—_ The Permittee will cause an approved copy of-the appHcattoR,to baattd rernlal nlfttal aatisfactprily completed, in accordance wlth the'arm of this a".hgd Apq�tlon All dare S7P dl¢tt(r §ret�S4I Bit il4gfrPtlt Mead put�tarit to, this permit will be repaired to tte IS ion q(thaDop TIRO " I O s Upon completion of the work wtthift the state 171twAX qX aaftktoxisad kr k4 ,Pf �1 !F pBFBore. r CrR9 ,; municipality,or state department oraganoyj and his oGI B succoassors lop ttatiatt# M9 a f�R- litP of such work or portion of such work as set forth withiothe tgtTos and•<ffarldlfKOiaa 4 AT,tI ADdL q-aa p PERM 42(5109)REVERSE INSPECTION REPORT For each Highway Work Permit issued, inspections will be performed.The following report must be egmpleted for each site visit, indicating the date, inspector, and hours spent on inspection. If the total inspection time exceeds 1 hour,then a FIN 12(PERMIT INSPECTION FOR DEPARTMENT SERVICES)is REQUIRED. INSPECTION REPORT HOURS WORKED BY DATE, HOURS Name Date Regular Overtime R O Name Date Regular Overtime R 0 Name Date Regular Overtime R O R=Regular Time,0=Overtime TOTAL HOURS INSTRUCTIONS; 1. NAME: Name of inspector. 2. DATE: Day inspected. 3. R: The number of Regular hours spent on inspection for that day. 4. 0: The number of Overtime hours spent on inspection for that day. 5. HOURS: Add across rows for R and O. 6. TOTAL HOURS: Add the columns for R and 0. COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ABOVE iS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. NAME TITLE PERM 41 1d 14186) REVERSE b. Boring,Jacking, and Tunneling Methods a) All the requirements of B.I. a. 1.) DESIGN a)through f)shall apply. b) Open excavations shall be protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transportationn, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. CONSTRUCTION a) All the requirements of B. 1. a. 1.) CONSTRUCTION shall apply. C. SUBBASE, PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER REDUIREMENTS Including manholes) 1. Subbase a. The subbase course shall be a minimum of 12 inches thick unless otherwise approved.The material shall most the requirements of current Department of Transportation subbase course item as specified by the Regional Soils Engineer. b. Under the permit,construction which adversely affects the subsurface drainage of the pavement structure shag be corrected by the addition of surface or subsurface drains,as required. 2. Pavement and Shoulders a. Permanent The replaced pavement shall be similar to the existing pavement in composition and texture. The selection of the material type and compositan shall be subject to the approval of the Regional Director or his.representative.The limit of pavement replacement shall he such that the replaced pavement is supported by thoroughly compacted subbase material and the pavement is restored to the proper grade,cross-slope and smoothness. When bituminous concrete mixtures are required for the pavement replacement,the layers shall consist of one or a combination of mixture types contained in Table 401 1, Composition of Bituminous Plant Mixtures in Section 401 of the New York State Department of Transportation's Specification, including addenda. The mixture shall be placed at the proper temperature, without segregation, and compacted thoroughly. When portland cement concrete mixtures are required for pavement replacement,the mixtures shall consist of either Class C or Class F as contained in Table 5013,Concrete Mixtures in Section 501 of the New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications,including addenda.Class F is a high early strength mixture and should he used when early opening to traffic is desired. The concrete mixtures shall be placed without segregation,then consolidated,finished to the proper elevation,and textured.Curing the concrete pavement shall be in actor dance with one of the methods permitted in Section 502 pertaining to curing. Pavement shoulders,curbs, gutters and other incidental features shall be replaced in kind unless otherwise approved by the Regional Director or his representative. b. Temporary Pavement that is replaced temporarily may be paved with either a hot bituminous concrete mixture mentioned above or a cold bituminous patching mixture. When a cold patching mixture is used it shall consist of aggregate and bituminous material proportioned and mixed in a bituminous mixing plant or rotating paddle shaft pugmill.Regardless which patching mixture is used it shall be laid on a prepared foundation and thoroughly compacted.Since cold bituminous patching mixtures are subject to distortion by traffic, the temporary patch shall be maintained to provide a smooth surface until the pavement is permanently replaced. 3. Manholes Manhole frames and covers shall have sufficient structural adequacy to support the roadway traffic.The type of manhole frame and cover shall be approved by the Regional Director or his representative.The manhole frame shall he set flush with the surface of the roadway unless otherwise permitted by the Regional Director or his representative. D. MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 1. Traffic is to be maintained at all times during the progress of this work and adequate signs,barricades and lights shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Sub-chapter H of the N.Y.S.Department of Transportation's Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.A maintenance and protection of traffic plan may be required.No lanes shall be closed without prior approval. 2. The applicant shall erect and maintain suitable barricades around all trenches while work is in progress for the protection of the public,and they shall he suitably lighted by yellow lights at night. The work shall be carried on in such manner that not more than 100 feet of trench in earth remains open at and of day's work. 3. No pavement cuts are to be left unfilled over night,except in emergencies,and in such cases,adequate precautions must be exercised to protect traffic.Prior approval must be obtained to use steel plating. 4. No construction materials or equipment shall be left on the shoulders or pavement after working flours,nor shall any construction equipment or material be placed in any manner or location that will obstruct highway or railroad warning signs. 5. All open trench in the highway right of-way shall be barricaded.There shall be conspicuously displayed bright red flags no less than 24"x 24"attached to such barricades and illuminated at night with flashing yellow lights.If in the judgment of the representative of the Commissioner of Transportation,flagmen are necessary,they shall be employed by the permittee and on duty at all times during the progress of the work so as to direct traffic and maintain yellow flashing lights, etc. 6. Soft shoulder signs of adequate size,not less than 24"square,shag be erected and maintained an all hackfill trenches within the shoulder area until the backfill is thoroughly settled.These signs shall be located at the beginning of each section of work at intersections and at a distance not greater than 1000 feet apart. 7. During winter conditions highway shoulders shall be maintained free of obstructions which would interfere with now removal and ice control. 8. The permittee shall keep the traveled way free of foreign objects such as rocks,timber and other items that may fall from transporting vehicles.Spillage of material carried by or dropped from the undercarriage of any carrying vehicle resulting from the permittee's hauling operations along at across any public traveled way shall be removed immediate ly and such traveled way, both within and outside of the work limits,shall be kept free of such spillage by the permittee. E. COMPLETION OF WORK 1. All work is to he performed in a manner approved by the Resident Engineer of the State Department of Transportation. 2. All disturbed areas shall he returned to their original condition in a manner satisfactory to the Commissioner of Transportation or his representative 3. The permittee shall be required to restore shoulders and ditches and clean up the highway as his work progresses.All driveways shall be restored with material in kind and to their original conditions. 4. All surplus earth and rubbish shall be cleaned up and removed from the highway right-of-way upon completion of the work,and the highway left in a neat and orderly condition. 5. As built plans showing final grade of new installation and existing underground facilities encountered shall be provided to N.Y.S.O.O.T.if variation from approved design plans occurred during construction. F. NECESSITATED FUTURE WORK 1. The applicant agrees,that any present or future injury to or disturbance of the highway,its slopes or gutters,caused by placing mains and service pipe shall be repaired by the applicant at his own expense and in accordance with the requirements of the State Department of Transportation. 2. If necessity arises in the future because of the work an the State Highway system andlor its structures,requiring the removal,relocation or replacement of the installation authorized by the permit, said work shall be done as directed by the Commissioner or his representative,and all cost and expense so incurred shall be the obligation of the said permittee or his successor in interest. 11. TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH INSTALLATIONS A. SETTING OF POLES 1. All poles shall be set outside the ditch lines so that the proper drainage of the highway will not he interfered with.In case it is impracticable to set poles so as not to interfere with the flow of water in the ditches,the shoulder, ditch and space around the poles shall be paved by the applicant to protect against wash. 2. There shall be no obstruction to private driveways, connecting highways or roads,paths or sidewalks. 3. In case it is found necessary to trim trees within the boundaries of the highway,the least possible amount shall he done,and in all cases the consent of the abutting property owner must he secured before the poles are set and trees trimmed. 4. Poles shall he of sufficient length to provide a clearance of not less than eighteen feet between the wire and the crown of the highway,under the worst condtitions of temperature and loading.They shall be set in line and property plumbed.They shall be well guyed. No guying to Vacs, unions by special permission of owoor. Special precautions shall be taken an curves and where lines cross from one side of highway to the other.Poles shall be straight,sound,and the fittings shall be of sufficient strength to carry wires under the worst condition of loading (ice, wind, etc). 5. Where telegraph and telephone wires cross high tension power lines, electric light or trolley wires, special precaution shall be taken to maintain proper clearance under the worst condition of temperature and loading. B. RESETTING POLES 1. If necessity arises in future,because of work on the highway,to relocate,replace or reset poles,cables or conduits,said work shall he done at the expense of the applicant. 111. SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. In addition to the aforementioned conditions,if it is found necessary by this Department to add to or otherwise modify the same,it is to be understood such changes shall form a part of the permit and be complied with immediately upon notice. IV. ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND SKETCHES - Sae Attached Sheet. PERM 41 1d 14186) METHOD OF PERFORMING WORN WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY I. GENERAL CONDITIONS These conditions and regulations apply to Highway Work Permits authorizing work within the State highway right-of way for water mains,gas mains,sewer lines and miscellaneous structures. General conditions apply to telephone and telegraph installations as well as specific conditions on the setting and resetting of pales.These conditons, and any special conditions which are added to this farm, are enforceable by the Department of Transportation. A. TIME 1. Work under the permit shall be commenced within thirty(301 days from the date of permit issuance unless a later starting date is approved by the Regional Traffic Engineer. B. REOUIREMENTS All the current requirements of the following shall apply: Occupational Safety and Health Administration,Federal Department of Labor,Safety and Health Standards(29 CFR 192611910); Part 131,Title 17, New York Code of Rules and Regulations,Accommodation of Utilities Within State Right st-Way;New York State Department of Labor, Industrial Code Rule 23,Protection of Persons Employed in Construction and Demolition Work;Industrial Code Rule 53,Construction,Excavation and Demolition Operations At Or Near Underground Facilities. Temporary sail erosion and water pollution controls shall be used as required.The final decision on the method of underground installation will he made by the Regional Director or his representative. 1. Work Within Pavement and Shoulder Areas a. Installations that crass the pavement and shoulder area.Wherever practical,all underground installations shall be placed beneath the pavement and shoulder areas without disturbance to rhos¢ paved surfaces. 1) Boring,Jacking, and Tunneling Methods DESIGN a) The location of all excavations jacking pits, etc.)shall be shown in plan and profile. b) The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall be determined by adequate subsurface exploration. c) The location of all other existing utilities shall be shown. d) The construction equipment and procedures to be used shall be described in the permit application. e) The design of all excavations, including ground and surface water control where necessary,shall be made available for review by the Department. f) The underground installation shall be described in detail,i.e. size, length, depth,material, provisions for grouting,etc. gl Pipes shall generally be enclosed in sleeves or larger pipes.Small diameter services 12 inch 1.0.m smaller)may he placed without sleeving at the discretion of N.Y.S.D.O.T. h) The limits of an open excavation shall not be closer than 10 feet to the edge of the pavement unless approved by the Department. Open excavations shall be protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transporta lion, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. CONSTRUCTION a) Grouting operations may be required if surface settlement,loss of soil or voids around the pipe develop.When grout is required,it shall consist of 1 part cement to 2 parts sand, by volume, and sufficient water to produce a consistency suitable for placing the grout. h) Backfill of open excavations shall be as required under 2.) If Open Excavation Method. 21 Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) The location of all pavement crossing by the open excavation method shall be shown in plan and profile. M The sail profile and groundwater conditions shall be determined by adequate subsurface exploration. c) The location of all other existing utilities shall be shown. d) The design of all excavations, including ground and surface water control where necessary,shall be made avaiable for review by the Department. e) When requested, the construction equipment and procedures to be used shall be described in the permit application. f) Pipe installations shall be done according to the requirements of the appropriate New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Sheets.The required granular material shall meet the material requirements for Select Granular Fill in the current New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Specifications including addenda. Exceptions will only be allowed if prior approval is granted by the Regional Soils Engineer. 9) Pavement shall be saw cut at termination points of pavement replacement. CONSTRUCTION a) Pavement and shoulder removal shall be done in a manner that provides for proper restoration of the replacement section.Straight,vertical cuts of the pavement will be required.Pavement surfaces that become undermined shall be cut back and removed.Alternative repair methods may be used if prior approval is granted. b) The backtill material shall be placed and compacted according to the requirements for backfilling structures,culverts,pipes,conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200,Earthwark, New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications, including addenda. c) Generally,cuts shalt be filled at the end of each working day.With prior approval, steel cover plates may be used. Recessing of these plates may be required. d) Temporary pavements and shoulders shall be placed as soon as a crossover installation is completed. G. Installations that are longitudinal to the pavement. 11 Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) The location of all open excavations shall be shown in plan and profile. b) The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall be determined by adequate subsurface exploration. c) The design of all excavations,including ground and surface water control where necessary,shall be made available for review by the Department. d) The location of all other existing utilities shall be shown. a) Pipe installations shall be done according to the requirements of the appropriate New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Sheets.The required granular material shall meet the material requirements for Select Granular Fill in the current New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Specifications, including addenda. Exceptions will only be allowed if prior approval is granted by the Regional Soils Engineer. CONSTRUCTION a) Pavement and shoulder removal shall be done in a manner that provides for proper restoration of the replacement section.Straight,vertical cuts of the pavement will be required.Pavement surfaces that became undermined shall he cut back and removed.Alternative repair methods may be used if prior approval is granted. b) The backfill material shall be placed and compacted according to the requirements for backfilling structures,culverts,pipes,conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200, Earthwork,New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications,including addenda. c) Generally,cuts shall be filled at the end of each working day.With prior approval,steel cover plates may be used. Recessing of these plates may he required. d) Permanent or temporary pavement shag be placed immediately as.sections of the total installation am,completed to subbase elevation.Gravel surfaces in shoulder areas may be used if prior approval is granted. 2) Boring, Jacking, and Tunneling Methods DESIGN a) All the requirements of B.I. a. 1.) DESIGN a)through g) shall apply. CONSTRUCTION a) All the requirements of B.1 a. 1.)CONSTRUCTION a)and b)shall apply. b) Open excavations shell be protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transportation, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. cl The requirements of B.1. b. 1.) CONSTRUCTION dl shall apply. 2. Work Outside the Pavement and Shoulder Areas a. Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) All the requirements of B.1.It. 1.)DESIGN shall apply. b) Open excavations shall be protected with the requried controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transportation, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. CONSTRUCTION a) The backtill material 1M placed and compacted according to the requirements for backfillin lures,culverts,pipes,conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200, Eart New York State Department of Transportation's Specificationsfing addenda. PEs e(200) STATE OF NEW YORK CEPARTME�TRANSPORTATION PREPARE 3 COPIES NIONWAY WORK PERMIT APPLICA POR UTILITY WORK AM9"6W,.'RAr1ROr"Nr{AIyM{T*Wk, ItnK PerjaMspWlosg^ YMvWlA{Irw a Swwd Amlinlll{Uar: nor SUFPOLK'COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Ire Adds 4060 SUNRISE HIGHWAY AEEMw CRY OAKDALE eb NY 24 11769 Ok) srs_ZI• CIwIR{AeeeuRCa4 - Pw1C ldNttlEVEon NL PWrNID.N&wSmWRwuyNL 11-60002552 Apple TWWp q 631 583�0263 CaRlol�M rAA W YINIRNpP 7IMKILOOMMONS ""YP'""{N' tM110r NIWI ninib* R[IIIIMOPOIBMMNMOT@ mtwsrwrtnwrwalA Rwru W PMMTMI�wulr NrM AEsw AJdarr CN ShY-TIR ON Zl 1. ErNnrblao WM bmft .ln IYU-91 rwe"N i a And*sW AYNnalw P�20 do m-:*.p*I0{nap9,v*Wq tllrMrO{Wm 3 Pmt,*AUb t{i�wmWby Pd"NP. RPKG-0801-00180 .-*N,yl,OY01/W10.. 20;�_ 4. A*M=ft.**b6dM pbrwr,r.rad&/b".:; Al.� �_00!�y��1��fy� CIKQ WMOPOPKMTION � TwWll Tam. Alld 1. arw-IIIrwM L4 '•�iswit,lnr4 bhp { L❑C�ewW MYNi POYY� m ML a❑IWAYI�RbrrWwrYs mnn I a 1MiIR 'ne.rv. m 260VN1 is 4. R�YrIRrAwmnwokn 1{ �RrpARFrWaI a RroMgplWrltlopA K6 LmRN�M Mr{VIrYlrsn�A4 a W�P��iGY�brtl�l ' inrMlwneY{r..+t. A❑A�raI�RlaaFw{al LQ.�sdws�n�lmrruw � PW= m{ 0.❑INbrim:D4T.nprY{.,... NC ... aon�m to or.ar..w« 19 L❑R�IYrNIyKNI{{Rry-. m . mty .t 1.❑A�IA0.iIlrniswdrAmrwmt t{ w❑rRrerYraw K PROPOSED WORK(BRIEF DESCRIPTION) INSTALLATION OF APPROX.2055'OF Ir D.L.P.N&W/S/O MAIN ROAD(S.R.25).E/F TRUMAN'S PATH TO PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL DRE L(AT DAM POND CHANNEL) 430'OF HDPE BY DIRECTIONAL DRE L FROM THE WEST SIDE OF BRIDGE TO EAST SIDE OF BRIDGE(AT DAM POND CHANNEL) 14661' it DIP ON THE NIS/O MAIN ROAD(SJL 25)FROM EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL DRIIL TO BROWNS HELL ROAD RESTORATION: TOTAL IN STATE R.O.W.:+/-17146'SOME PAVEMENT WELL BE DISTURBED @ MAIN ROAD (S.R.25) ALL WORK WELL BE COMPLETED IN THE GRASS OR O ER AREA.SOMB PAVEMENT AND GRASS WELL BE DISTURBED. AwArrIURNEA.MM .... m�:•sPRw1aRA®p+ .,. ... 1Y+rN{�.. -.. Kos :r::. _ m. .r._._.arrtiY6:[nre +l► " k.;, ,,,. Fb*n ,,. PERWIBMKMCONTROWUP LOC&ASQ WMAOMS66108ATORM PERM 36(OW07) ATTACMKENT TO HIGHWAY WORK PERWI at my most during ommalbusmess haws or while worlds actually beingperfmmed Upmaccepomceofthewmirby the DepwhoeM all records shall beecm a the properly ofthe Department the Permiltee may make or Main copies ofsuch records stibeirosuimpense. The purpose ofdam,requiremeuh is to document compliance by the Permitlee(and an contractors or sub-comrMmomphoyod by the Parnit cc)with the quality and workmanship requirements shown m the Plans and required by the Standard Specifcmidms C. )btainingallaccessary material samples and conducting all necessary material talc in aecordanmwith the I3cparhwW%Mesmals methols. If the Department dcurmmcs that plum inspections for asphalt cmmaele and Portland ameot cowrto will be required,the PertniMec shelf make mrangamrnm with a reputable testing laboratory(which shall be approved by the Department)to pafmn such inspections wording to the Depedmem's Stamlank. The Per®tlee will be responsible for all arson associated with obtaining and testing ofsemphoc D. Conducting an inventory of all misting highway tbsaurs including,but not limikdw.gigs,signals,Mucmrm ogmpmmt,etc.in coordination with the Deportment's Engineer and ter Permiltee. E. Prepmatim of all drawmga,sketches,and plane necessary for changes to moot actual field conditions. r. Providing three sets of Record(As-Built)Plans upon completion of the work O. Reviewing andirspMing compliance with all aspxb oftheMaimensoo r B Protection of I raffic provisiamofde Plane,the Permit NYCRR Title 17,volume B(s.ks.NYSMUCCD)and NYSDOT Standard Specigcatime and swdP*g the Department of any non- compliance isms. H.'Ihc Cantu lam meat nmiPo the Department,PerrMsee and Connector of a cireums atom or audition ofthc work ohscrvcd by and (mown to the Comuhanl per required training to be a violation of araised.Safe or local law,ordinance amgulatim.The Consultant shall inform the Iepu brwdofmy violations m do per mmenoo ofthawork mthispmnitwhieh Meet immcddasly axrcctcd Info event the ConsulYd re agdrs a Cootrac ues ovenigld or a Cmlrslur's okvelpad of project safety attainments which lass an immediate risk ofser ens personal safety and/orpmpmly damsga,the Consultant sball have the authority tonotifythe Com meta tostop work i®odiakly:isumg a shop-work order,and then I►e Co n ullaol ship promptly notify do Drpanment and the Penetrative ofsm h stop-work ads.NodButim and/or issuance of a stop-work order by the Cmrsrhartt shag our relieve Poe,Contractor Gam sole respounlot*forjob stleam"and compliance with all applicable Federal,Sale or local toms,ordinances and regulations. 'I-ImMpmhoeoareserves the r4M to impact the wort for wmpBmuwith Federal,State orhand laws,collusions and regdetiom,but is udanoobligabmtoperGrmaahmapwbti adananmeanoregp ' itilyfmIrkofanymntpliaocemPoopadofdeCmkectm If the Department dstemm a that them are serious;or pars"vioWiom;of appheable Federal.Shia or load laws,adimcas ad rega6tias in the work of this Permit Ike Department may issue a dop-work order and all Permit weak will cos immediately.In addition,the Permit may be revoked ifthe safety ieasoa are tom towered to also Dgtrlmenea saticfictinn. IhcC:nnsutant is mspormble Its no musing theoemscNr's cffine to maintain traffic adproe: the public Gem damapeopnsonar property in aaxadmcw with plans and spe:ifiabout,with®Iha limits of and 6r fur dmatiun u(the permit work B. The Parasites sell reimburse the State fur an reasonable Permit angunexmg review costs.,ad for my Department completed impactiea which may be necessary due to ncgldgma on thepMofthe Pammee.lea Contractors,Mdra Cessumnt 7lrmneWahell imclsk.but not be 1®led to.salmirs and Gorge bcmfm for the Depalmem's Eogmmm and fermstaied resposlo4 travel costs,ore Anwdcpakrm dbytbDPonntlooshaUbcammamtheStdm xcmb=iaaedbythoDuparam Kd=Dcpamaawi bffldo Permitt e,mmihdy.+nd(be Psmillee agrees to pay an such bilk wilhm 30 adedw days ofthe binmg due.Failure to pay such bids promptly shell be doomed abreact ofde Permit 9. Prior to tha intended dwm axaccoeol ofwork,dr Pernmew"develop aschedde amthe ruu6aemorworkpaogranefuthe acompWkmror of all wale authorized by the Permit and shall mbm t this schedule to don Comwhant and the Ikgrtomt for imformatioml purposes The Penuitim shelf p argally notify the Consultant and the DepattmM ofany changes to the schedule. 10. The Per®1roe shelf dnigme in writing to the De artmud the ComhaaWs om-sile person who will be rspomab for all cammw1imseivileaewaalbydies Pe it,adsMlimmediatalymtiythe(:ananlhemadthsIlepartoierrtin writingifihmeisanry chengeoftheparmasodsiguamd The PermitmsWabodmgoateammmaapers memesgmeycmbwbmdskAeembhshm amorgcsytoloplaro list phis list shelf be kgloameehythe Pcmmimo ad dell be provided to the Cmadlyd,mtho lkpatosad.ad I-heal public:safely agesies 11.Prior to tho cuoanmvemenl ofwork the Permilleesholl arrange a prFcmanw9km momnngwilhDcpamo d"(be Consultant.the Pcrmitno,eddoPrnnima's atnhaetora. The purpose ofdis meeting is teusurethmthem its clarntderaWsdio&apociallymLn part of the Commits and CaneuhanL of de regnhemaam dosed by the Isms and cmdtmos of the P ' The Permilim shelf notify the Regional Permit Engineer a ma„r.,n„n oftcm days prior to the meeting oL Cmsulaanl Adhori4ed Signmme• Psmittm Signature d - doe— Title rdc C4SWAl /assore . PC . WRFFOLK 6 . W.4-7E/ C�12�l1 Consulting rime Corpumim •Cmultanl sulhuticed sigu cure most ha M person who cm legally cot®il the ouos ltimg firm to the requirements ofthis ageemaL STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11786 MAJOR c0MTRL==flVSP'EC=NRF0[1tRF_MAWAGI EEMENT PATH PERMtTTEE FOR HIGHR'.4Y w'ORl PER.N 7y Permit Na.: Date)ssued Permiaee'sName: COurrf� G✓Gifri �4f� or,t _ Address: 40W .Sur,r is-{ hi-J� Town: 04/ .44IV State Zip Code: l/ZJ69 State Highway Number. -2j Location of Work 6sfm1r,pri1ILNT Permit work has been assigned to our Nassau Syffiolk Construction Croup Contact Number . All work to be coordinated with the State Engineer- in-Charge assigned to your project. 'As part of New York State Requirements, concerning Pamit kVircilan ofmq/or pirojew being done within the Store Right-of Way, requires that the permUtee smug the serviees ofa reputable consultant or engineeringJirm (approval required by New York State Deportment of Transportation Construction GroW)to perform the Inspection of all workFsrmfmd by the Department of Transportation The consultant or engineering firm doing the inspection will be responsible to the New Yak StateDepartment of Transportation Engineer-tn-Cho gs, that has been assigned to oversee the permit work 77se permittee will be responsible for all phases of work even though sub-contractors are secured to perform certain phases of the permitted work Changes to approved plans must be submitted to the Permit Deportment for approval prior to the start of any work AA work is to be done in accordance with the New Yak State Specifications or as indicated by the Engineer-in-Charge. 77w permaree will be responsible for the Maintenance and Protection of Tra a for the duration of the permitted work HWP CASE 09-228P NY 25, ORIENT SCWA PROPOSED MAIN INSTALLATION PERMIT AMENDMENT All NYSDOT Standard Specifications shall apply and the provisions of Section 209 Soil Erosion & Sediment Control and Section 107-12 Water Quality Protection are emphasized. If a situation comes to the Engineer's attention the Erosion & Sediment Control (ESC) plans included in the contract documents may be modified, by the Engineer, to correct unsatisfactory procedures and operations, including locations of ESC measures. ESC shall be installed prior to the beginning of construction and excavation. Silt fence shall be installed so that each section shall overlap by one panel length and/or two post ends shall be wrapped together for continuous support. All ESC controls shall be inspected by the contractor every 7 days and after each rainfall of 1/2 inch or more within a 12 hour period, or daily during prolonged rainfall to detemune if the measures are functioning as intended. Within 3 calendar days from completion of each inspection, the contractor shall: * Repair or rebuild the control measure to function as originally intended. *Remove sediment deposition which reaches one half the height of the control measure. Site disturbance shall be stabilized as construction progresses using permanent or temporary stabilization measures. All temporary stabilization shall be replaced by permanent stabilization prior to project completion. Under no condition shall earth material exposed by excavation or other work be left without application of temporary or permanent erosion controls for a period of greater than 7 calendar days. If the Engineer determines that potential for erosion or sediment transport exists the contractor may be ordered to install temporary erosion controls earlier. If work is suspended, i.e. seasonally, all disturbed areas shall be stabilized and ERC measures shall be inspected monthly and after rain and snow melt events. Permanent stabilization shall require the application of topsoil and seeding as indicated in the contract documents. Full stabilization shall be achieved when uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of no less than 80% has been established on all unpaved areas. Temporary stabilization shall require the application of mulch, seed &mulch, or Class I Short Term rolled erosion control product (RECP). Mulch may be straw bales and shall be spread at the rate of 2-3 bales per 1000 square feet. RECP shall be installed outside of the growing seasons, AOBE. All applications shall be as per NYSDOT Standards. Page 1 of 2 Temporary seeding shall be: Annual Ryegrass spread at the rate of 301b/acre or 11.5 oz/1000 square feet OR Winter Ryegrass spread at the rate of 100 lb/acre or 36 oz/1000 square feet to uniformly cover the ground. Either of the two following seed mixes are acceptable for temporary seeding. *Annual Ryegrass—Lolium multiflorum, Commercial improved varieties *Winter Rye `Aroostook' —Lolium sp. `Aroostook', Commercial improved varieties Note: Temporary seeding is restricted to the following seasons: Annual Ryegrass—March 1 to September 30 `Aroostook' Winter Rye Grass—March 1 to April 1 or September 1 to November 30 " Page 2 of 2 Special Provisions for HWP#10-09-0 • All permitted activity must be coordinated with Resident Permit Engineer. • Under the Clean Water Act a Storm Water Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit is required for storm water management for any project that exceeds 0.4045 Ha (1 acre) of soil disturbance. SPDES documentation for site / right-of-way disturbances of one (1) acre or more is required prior to performing work in the State Highway ROW. The required documentation is the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Notice of Intent and the NYSDEC acknowledgement letter to use SPDES General Permit GP-0-08-001 for this project. • SCWA shall make the necessary arrangements to obtain the following permits prior to any work: • ECL Article 24 permit • ECL Article 25 permit • SECTION 404 Nationwide permit (NWP#3) • Section 401 Water Quality certification • EL Article 42 Coastal Consistency review • ALL work is subject to local, regional and national approvals and this HWP is only valid in conjunction with same. Temporary seeding shall be: Annual Ryegrass spread at the rate of 30 lb/acre or 11.5 oz/1000 square feet OR Winter Ryegrass spread at the rate of 1001b/acre or 36 oz/1000 square feet to uniformly cover the ground. Either of the two following seed mixes are acceptable for temporary seeding. *Annual Ryegrass —Lolium multiflorum, Commercial improved varieties *Winter Rye `Aroostook' —Lolium sp. `Aroostook', Commercial improved varieties Note: Temporary seeding is restricted to the following seasons: Annual Ryegrass—March 1 to September 30 `Aroostook' Winter Rye Grass—March 1 to April 1 or September 1 to November 30 " Page 2 of 2 New York State Departent of Environmental Conslovation Division of Environmental Permits, Region 1 _ SUNY @ Stony Brook imbow 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3409 - Phone: (631) 444-0365 •Fax: (631) 444-0360 Webalte: www.dec.nv.aov Alexander B.Grannis Commissioner PERMIT RENEWAL March 5, 2010 Timothy Kilcommons D L Suffolk County Water Authority D 4060 Sunrise Highway �— Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 Re: General Permit # 1-4700-00010/000624 Southhold Town Board of Trustees Dear Mr. Kilcommons: The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) is in receipt of your request to renew or extend the above referenced permit and the request has been reviewed pursuant to the Uniform Procedures Regulations (6NYCRR Part 621). In order to continue to conduct authorized activities the permit is hereby extended to February 24, 2015 with the addition of the following special condition. 15. The permittee must submit an annual report to DEC by January 30t' of each calendar year listing all the projects conducted by SCWA pursuant to this general permit. The report must list the start date and completion date or current status of each project, and the report must list the location and wetland or waterbody for each project. This letter is a modification to the original permit and must be available at the permitted site whenever authorized work is in progress. All other terms and conditions remain as written in the original permit. Sincerely, /ar��/kCa/-raraer�a Permit Administrator cc: MHP BOH File YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMr�AL CONSERVATION DEC PERMIT NUMBER I EFFECTIVE DATE 1-4700-00010/00624 August 1, 2005 FACILITY/PROGRAMNUMBER(S) PERMIT EXPIRATIONDATE(S) Under the Environmental August 1, 2010 Conservation Law TYPE OF PERMIT ■New ❑ Renewal ❑ Modification ❑Permit to Construct Cl Permit to Operate ■ Article 15,Title 5: Protection of Waters ❑ Article 17,Titles 7,8:SPDES ❑ Article 27,Title 9;6NYCRR 373: Hazardous Waste Management ❑ Article 15,Title 15:Water Supply ❑ Article 19:Air Pollution Control ❑ Article 34: Coastal Erosion ❑ Article 15,Title 15:Water Transport ❑ Article 23,Title 27: Mined Land Management Reclamation ❑ Article 15,Title 15: Long Island Wells ❑ Article 36:Flcodplain Management ■ Article 24: Freshwater Wetlands ■ Article 15,Title 27:Wild,Scenic and ❑ Articles 1,3, 17, 19,27,37: Recreational Rivers ■ Article 25:Tidal Wetlands 6NYCRR 380:Radiation Control W 6NYCRR 608:Water Quality Certification ❑ Article 27,Tdle 7;6NYCRR 360: ... Solid Waste Management 1- PERMIT ISSUED TO TELEPHONE NUMBER Suffolk County Water Authority (631) 563-0326 ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE 4050 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 C9NTACT PERSON FOR PERMITTED WORK TELEPHONE NUMBER James Wilson, same address as above. �;NAME'AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILITY E#pting roadways throughout Suffolk County �'c&)NTY TOWN WETLAND# NYTM COORDINATES Suffolk All Towns &Villages N/A DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY: INSTALLATION OF WATER MAINS WITHIN EXISTING ROAD- WAYS AND WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE ROADWAY SHOULDER. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEATTACHED PLANS PREPARED BY JAMES WILSON DATED 9/15104. By acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations, the General Conditions specified(see page 3&4)and any Special Conditions(see page 2)included as part of this permit. DEPUTY PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR: ADDRESS Region 1 Headquarters Mark Carrara Bldg. #40, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE j February 23, 2005 Page 1 of 4 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SPECIAL CONDITION 1. This permit does not authorize the installation of water mains directly in regulated Tidal Wetlands or Freshwater Wetlands and it does not authorize installation of individual dwelling hook-ups near wetlands. This permit authorizes water main installation within existing roadways only. 2. The road surface may only be restored in-kind with the same pre-existing material type. Dirt roads are not authorized to be paved without further NYSDEC approval. a. The permittee shall notify in writing the Regional Manager of the Bureau of Environmental Protection (BEP) for those projects within 100 feet of Freshwater Wetlands. The Regional Manager of the Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection (BMHP)must be notified for those projects within 300 feet of Tidal Wetlands. The notification must be received a minimum of 5 days prior to commencement. Notification shall include a project location map, photographs of the project site and adjacent wetland,and the expected duration of the project. 4. There shall be no disturbance to vegetated Tidal Wetlands or Freshwater Wetlands as a result of the permitted activity. 5;i,rAny excess excavated materials shall be immediately and completely disposed of in a legal manner. 6.. Trenching is prohibited during rain events. 7L, All disturbed areas where soil is temporarily exposed or stockpiled for longer than one day, shall be. covered with a tarp or contained by a continuous line of staked haybales placed on the downslope or wetland side. 8. Before trenching or excavation can begin within 100 feet of any regulated wetland, proper erosion control structures must be in place. A silt screen (maximum opening Sieve #20) and haybale barrier must be arected in order to effectively prevent excavated sediments from eroding into the wetlands or protected area. When the barrier is erected on sloped areas, haybales must be recessed into the ground 2 to 4 inches and the Silt screen recessed 6 inches to prevent underwash of sediment laden runoff. The barrier must be properly maintained to ensure its proper function until all disturbed areas are repaved and/or revegetated. i• Sediments trapped by the bales shall be removed and reused or transported to an approved upland location before the bales themselves are removed. 9i All fill shall consist of "clean" gravel and soil (not asphalt, slag, flyash, broken concrete or demolition debris). DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 2OF5 1-4700-00010/000624 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS 10. Dewatering using a 30 gallon per minute capacity trench pump is authorized. Direct discharge to storm drains is prohibited. All groundwater discharges must be contained within a haybale and silt screen barrier to effectively contain all sediment laden discharge, and a sediment filter bag must be attached to the outfali pipe. When discharging to unpaved areas, a splash pad must be erected to prevent additional turbidity caused by scouring of the unpaved area. 12. All areas of soil disturbance resulting from water main installations shall be seeded with an appropriate perennial grass and mulched with straw immediately upon completion of the work at each site. Mulch shall be maintained until a suitable vegetative cover is established. If seeding is impracticable due to the time of year,a temporary mulch shall be applied and final seeding shall be performed as soon as weather conditions favor germination and growth. 13. During construction, concrete or leachate shall not escape or be discharged, nor shall washings from ftarisit mix trucks,mixers,or other devices enter tidal wetlands,freshwater wetlands,and or protected buffer areas. 1A :All equipment and machinery shall be stored and safely contained greater than 100 feet landward of the regulated wetland or water body at the end of each work day. This will serve to avoid the inadvertent leakage of deleterious substances into the wetlands. Fuel or other chemical storage tanks shall be contained and located at all times in an area greater than 100 feet from any wetland or water body. If the above requirement cannot be met by the permittee,then the storage areas must be designed to completely contain any and all potential leakage. Such a containment system must be approved by NYSDEC staff prior to equipment, machinery or tank storage within 100 feet of any regulated wetland. DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 3 OF 5 1-4700-00010/00624 NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE LIGATIONS Item A: Permittee Accep egal Responsibility and Agrees to Ind ification The permittee expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department of Environmental Conservation of the ' State of New York, its representatives, employees, and agents("DEC")for all claims, suits, actions, and damages,to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittee's undertaking of activities in connection with,or operation and maintenance of, the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This indemnification does not extend to any claims,suits, actions, or damages to the extent attributable to DEC's own negligent or intentional acts or omissions, or to any claims, suits, or actions naming the DEC and arising under article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision under federal or state laws. Item B: Perrnittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easements and rights-of-way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. I�T�n D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights this permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of othjere in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights,title,or interest in real or petsonal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. GENERAL CONDITIONS General Condition 1: Facility Inspection by the Department The permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department)to determine whether the permittes is complying with this permit and the ECL.Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 771-0301 and SAIDA 401(3). The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by'the.Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a.copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. General Condition 2: Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Uhtess expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terns, conditions or requirements contained in suck order or determination. General Condition 3: Applications for Permit Renewals or Modifications p„-The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Department for renewal,modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal, modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. The permittee must submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES), Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMF), major Air Pollution Control (APC) and Solid Waste Management Facilities(SWMF); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. Submission of applications for permit renewal or modification are to be submitted to: NYSDEC Regional Permit Administrator, Region 1, SUNY Bldg#40, Stony Brook NY 11790-2356 General Condition 4: Permit Modifications, Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the right to modify,suspend or revoke this permit in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 621. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: a) materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; b) failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c) exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d) newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions, relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e) noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions, orders of the commissioner, any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. 1DEC,PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 4 OF 5 -4700-00010/00624 • NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ADDITIONAL GENERSONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (TITL 24, 25,34 AND 6NYCRR PART 608 ( FRESHWATER WETLANDS ) 1. If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health,safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work,obstructions,or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State,and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the structure,fill, excavation,or other modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall,without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 2. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 3. All necessary precautions shall be taken to prelude contamination of any wetland orwaterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. 4. Any material dredged in the conduct of the work herein permitted shall be removed evenly,without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway. 5. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized. 6. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 7. If granted under 6NYCRR Part 608,the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under Sections 301,302,303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217)provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. 10. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project, the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and, if required, a survey. 11. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by James Wilson dated 9/15/04 DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 5 OF 5 1-4760-00010/00624 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation -NOTIC 'E The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has issued permits) pursuant to the Environmental Conservation Law for work being conducteg at this site. For further information regarding the nature and extent of work approved and an Departmental conditions on it, contact the Regional Permit Admi nistrator trator lis ted below. - Please refer to the permit number shown when contacting the DEC. Regional Permit Administrator Permit Number /!*70Q "0/0 0062" ..0 ROaMExpiration Date 494-115 A,.es yWM E Np!►t.rr arolra. Ran 1 -01416 q SVW NOTE: This notice Is NOT a permit 1 Mew York State Dagwrtment of Environmental Conservation DIVJ*106 of Environmental Permits SUNY O Stony Brook, 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3409 TSlsphone (031) 444-0364 Famsirn#o (831) 444-0360 awx&ao a. amnds September 25, 2009 i Tows of Southold 411,79 11971 RE: 1473 8-02843/00002 Southhold TOWn Burd of Trustees Dear Permittee: In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures Act (Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621) we are enclosing your permit. Please carefully read all permit conditions and special conditions contained in the permit to ensure compliance during the teen of the permit. If you are unable to comply with any conditions, please contact us at the above address. Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted at the and protected from the weather. projectsite Sincerely, cU-wt'�/ Carol A. Farkas CAF/ls Environmental Analyst Enclosure I 9VEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION FIdUty'DEC ID 14738-02843 PEIUMT Under the Environmental Conservation Law CL Permittee and Facility Information Permit Land To: Facility: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DAM POND PO BOX 1179 ST RTE 25 -W SIDE OF DAM PONDISCTM 1000-22-3-2.1 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 EAST MARION,NY 11939 1 Facility Application Contact: Facility Permit Contact: SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY DAMES C MCMAHON PO BOX 38 SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL OAKDALE,NY 1 1 769-003 8 PO BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 (631)765-1892 Facility Location: in SOUTHOLD in SUFFOLK COUNTY Village: East Marion Facility Principal Reference Point: NYTM-E: 724.1 NYTM-N: 4557 Latitude: 41008100.2" Longitude: 7201948.4" Project Location: ST RTE 25 -WEST SIDE OF DAM POND-WATERCOURSE- DAM POND CHANNEL Authorized Activity: Diraxional bore a 12"HDPE pipe transmission main under Dam Pond Channel and along Route 25. All work must be done in acoordence with NYSDEC plan stamped approved on 9/24109 and prepared by SCWA 6116/09, test revised 7/22/09. (CAF) Permit Anthoriutions rkW wetlands-Under Article 25 Permit ID 1-4738-02843/00002 New Permit Effective Date:9/,ZV2009 Expiration Date:9041E NYSDEC Approval BY seeeptance of this permit,the permlttse agree that the permit is contingent upon strict :OMP'Uance with the ECL,an applicable regulations, and all conditions Included as part of this xrmit. 'etmit Administrator:SUSAN ACKERMAN,Deputy.Regional Permit Administrator sddress: NYSDEC REGION 1 HEADQUARTERS SUNY(0 STONY BROOV450 CIRCLE RD STONYI BROOF NY 11790-3409 A NEW VORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 1?amty DEC ID 14738-02843 Distribution List JAMES C MCMAHON SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Marine Habitat Protection CAROL A PARKAS Permit Components NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CbmmoNB GENERAL CONDMONS,APPLY TO ALL AUTHORIZED PERMITS NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIOATIONS NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS -Apply to the Following Permits: TIDAL WETLANDS I. State Not Liable for Damage The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from fixture operations uidertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes, and no :lain or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 2. No Construction Debris in Wetland or Adjacent Area Any debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely removed fium the adjacent area(upland)and removed to in approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in wetlands and/or protected buffer areas. 3. No Disturbance to Vegetated TWO Wetlands There shall be no disturbance to vegetated tidal wetianda'or protected buffer areas as a result of the permitted activities. 4. Storage of Equipment,Materials The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be XMI med within the project work area and/or upland area greater than SO linear feet from the tidal wetland boundary. a. Clean FIR Only All fill shall consist of clean sand,gravel,or soil(not asphalt,slag,flyash,broken :oncrete or demoligon debris). 6. No Beach Excavation For Fill No excavation of the beach is authorized for the purpose of 3btaining fill or stone materials. 7. Notice of Commencement At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project,the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they re fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion :)f project,the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of • NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Fatuity DEC I D 1-4739-02843 8. Conformance With Plana All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or applicant's agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by Suffolk County Water Authority on 6/16/09,last revised 7/22/09. 9. State May Order Removal or-Alteration of Work If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorize(,or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to,the free navigation Of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health,safety or welfare of the people of the State,or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work,obstructions,or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if,upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the structure, fill,excavation,or other i modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed,the owners,shall,without expense to the State,and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its forma condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall 3e made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 10. Precautions Against Contamination of Waten All necessary precautions shall be taken to rreclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids,sediments,fuels,solvents, ubricants,epoxy coatings,paints, concrete,leachate or any other envirommentally deleterious materials associated with the project. mo St to May Require Site Restoration If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the J hereby authorized has not been completed,the applicant shall,without expense to the State,and o such extent and in such time and manna.as the Deportment of Environmental Conservation may equire,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its forma *ndition. No claim shall be nude against the State of New York on account of any such removal or iteration. i GENERAL CONDITIONS- Apply to ALL Authorized permits: 1. Facility Inspection by The Departalent The permitted site or facility,including relevant records, is ubjeet to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department Environmental Conservation(the Department)to determine whether the permittee is complying with Permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301 nd SAPA 401(3). 'he permittoe shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection the permit area when requested by the Department. i COPY of this permit, including all referenced maps,drawings and special conditions,must be available x inspection by the Departmentat all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of ne permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. t NEW PORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 0 Faciaty DEC ID 1-4738-02943 2. Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify,supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms,conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. 3. Applications For Permit Renewals,Modifications or Transfers The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Department for permit renewal,modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any form or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal,modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. Submission of applications for permit renewal,modification or transfer are to be submitted to: Regional Permit Administrator NYSDEC REGION 1 HEADQUARTERS SUNY®STONY BROOY450.C1RCLE RD STONY BROOK,NY11790-3409 4. Submission of Renewal Application -fie permittee must submit a renewal application at least 30 Jays before permit expiration for the following permit authorizations:Tidal Wetlands. S. Permit Modifications,Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the right to modify,suspend or revoke this permit. The grounds for modification,suspension or -evocation include: a. materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; b. failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c. exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d. newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions,relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e. noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions,orders of the commissioner,any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. S. Permit Transfer Permits are transftrable unless specifically prohibited by statute,regulation or s<othar Permit condition. Applications for permit transfer should be submitted prior to actual transfer of 1wnership. iEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 7scility DEC ID 1-4733-02943 NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification Me permittee,excepting state or federal agencies,expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the 3epartment of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York,its representatives,employees, and agents("DEC")for all claims,suits,actions,and damages,to the extent attributable to the 3etmittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittee's undertaking of activities in connection Nith,or operation and maintenance of,the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in :ompliance or not in compliance with the teams and conditions of the permit. This indemniticetion does t iot extend to-any claims,suits,actions,or damages to the extent attributable to DECO own negligent or intentional ads or omissions,or to any claims,suits,or actions naming the DEC and arising under Article 78 of the New York Civil Practice.Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision ,order federal or state laws. Item B: Permutes',Contractors to Comply with Permit The pamittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors,employees,agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit,including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permitter is responsible for obtaining any other permits,approvals, lands,casements and rights-of- way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D:No Right to Trespa s or Interfere with Riparian Rights j This permit does not convey to the pemrittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the.permitted wok nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights,title,or interest in real orpersonal property held or vested in a pawn not a party to the permiti i i i s 16315677895 SURCILKCWWATE 16:43:35 12-29-2009 23 r. i DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW YORK Dm7RIC7,CORPS OF ENOWEERS JACOa K JAWSFEDERAL 9ULORiO NEW YORKRK,N.Y.10Z7e-009e nev0vro DEC , ] 2M ATMUnMOF' Regulatory Branch-Eastern Permits Section SUBJECT: Application Number NM-2009-01325-EMo County Water Authority Suffolk County Water Authority4060 Sunrise HighwayOakdale, N.Y. 11769 Gentlemen: On November 16, 2009, the New York District Corps of Engineers received a request for Department of the Army authorization to install, by directional drilling, approximately 420 linear feet of 12-inch diameter water main to approximately 12-feet below the existing level of the waterway substrate and Dam Pond Channel, a tributary to Noyack Bay, Shelter Island Sound at East Marion, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Based on the information submitted to this office, and accomplishment of notification in accordance with the applicable federal requirements, our review of the project indicates that an individual permit is not required. It appears that the activities within the jurisdiction of this office could be accomplished under Department of the Army Nationwide General Permit Number 12. The nationwide permits are prescribed as an Issuance of Nationwide Permits in the Federal Register dated March 12, 2007 (FR Vol . 72, No. 47) . The work may be performed without further authorization from this office provided the activity complies with the permit conditions listed in Section B, No. 12 Section C, any applicable New York District regional conditions, and any applicable regional conditions added by the State of New York, copies enclosed. Special Condition 1) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Snginears, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. 16315577MS SUFFOU(CO WA7E 16:43:48 12-29-2009 313 Please note that this nationwide permit (NWP) verification is 0 basbd on a preliminary jurisdictional determination (JD) . A preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, prior to commencement of the authorized work you may request an approved JD, which may be appealed, by contacting the New York District , U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for further instruction. To assist you in this decision and address any questions you may have on the differences between preliminary and approved jurisdictional determinations, please review U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, which can be found at : http://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Documents/cecwo/reg/rcls/r lo8 02 pdf This verification is valid for a period of two years from the date of this letter, unless the nationwide permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. This verification will remain valid for two years from the date of this letter if the activity complies with the terms of any subsequent modifications of the nationwide permit authorization. If the nationwide permits are suspended, revoked, or modified in such a way that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of a nationwide permit, and the proposed activity has commenced, or is under contract to commence, the permittee shall have 12 months from the date of such action to complete the activity. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked March 18, 2012 . It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. we will issue a public notice when the NWPs are reissued. This authorisation is conditional on the applicants receipt of the required water quality certificate or waiver from the New York State D artment of Eaviroameatal Conservation (NYSDEC) . No wor may be accomp s uat t required approva rom NrSDEc has been obtained. This authorization is conditional on the applicant's receipt of the required coastal zone management concurrence or waiver from the New York St!! De artment of State (NYSDOSI . No work may be accomplisheduntite to required approval rom NrSDOS has been obtained. within 30 days of the completion of the activity authorized by this permit, and any mitigation required by this permit, you are to sign and submit the attached compliance certification form to this office. If any questions should arise concerning this matter, please contact Craig Spitz, of my staff, at (917) 790-8522 . Sincerely, Stace M. Jense Acting Chief, Eastern Permits Section aH. O rawrorlrerAra David Paterson New York State Office of Parks, Governor Recreation and Historic Preservation Carol.Asn Historic Preservation Field.Services•.Peebles Island, PO BOX 189,Waterford;Now York 12188-0189 . Cammiseloner 518-237-8643 www,nyeparks.com October 26,2009 i Ms.Mary Sullivan 11 L'7 Assistant to Deputy CEO Operations,Project Coordinator D Suffolk County water Authority 4060 Sunrise.Highway southhod Town Oakdale,NY 11769•..rRo2rd of Trustees ' Re: ARRA — Brown's,Hill Water Main Beat Marion to Orient,Suffolk County Dear Mi. Sullivan: 09PR03458 Thank you for.requesting the comments of the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO). We Projectin accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act have reviewed the of 1966. Thee h comments are those of the SHPO.and relate only to Historic/Cultural rarov , 'M do notinclude iental mpacts to New York State Parldand that may be involved in of near your project Such impacts muspotential t be considered as part of the environmental review of the Proj�Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and/or the State Environmental Quality Review Act(New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 8). Virginia Banos of our National Register Unit advises that there are structures within the Area of Potential Effect that could be eligible for listing in%a National Register'of Historic Places. However,it appeus diet these structures will not-be affected by the Proposed work Michael Schiffvii of our Archaeology Unit has no lirch"omain Irk will have No regarding the proposed work It is the opinion of the 3HP0 that the proposed water National Re 'star ve Adverse Effect on historic or cultural resources eligible for dating or.listed on the Br Historic Places. . Should you have any questions regarding our determination,please telephone me at(518)237-8643,ext any fi or via email n ence or the ap project i tlYsr.1Q Kindly refer,to the project Review(PR)above in any future correspondence for the project Sincerely; Elizabeth Martin Historic Sites Restoration Coordinator j An Equal.opportunky,EmpioyedAiarmaeva Acaon Agency . . • I i James F. King, President ��,Of so�ryo Town Hall Annex Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Peggy A. Dickerson Southold, New York 11971.0959 Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio,Jr. Telephone (631) 765-1892 65-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES D TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Permit No.: 7129A Soi thhold Town Date of Receipt of Application: June 18, 2009 , d or T ,5tee5 Applicant: Suffolk County Water Authority SCTM#: N/A Project Location: Route 25, East Marion, over Dam Pond Channel Date of Resolutionlissuance: July 22, 2009 Date of Expiration: July 22, 2011 Reviewed by: Board of Trustees Protect Descriotion: For the installation of a 12" HDPE water main for the purpose of supplying drinking water and fire protection to the residents of East Marion residing east of Dam Pond channel. The grass area on the road's edge will contain all work pertaining to directional drilling (staging and receiving). The staging and receiving permits are to be approximately 300' east and west of the centerline. Depth of drill will be approximately 10' under the channel bottom. Hay bales and sift screen are to be installed to contain sediment laden run off. All excavation to be backfilled, stabilized and returned to the original condition. Excess fill to be removed and disposed of legally. Findings: The project meets all the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The issuance of an Administrative Permit allows for the operations as indicated on the site plan prepared by Suffolk County Water Authority last dated June 16, 2009, and received on June 18, 2009. Social Conditions: None. Inspections: Hay bale line with sift fencing inspection &final inspection. If the proposed activities do not meet the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, a Wetland Permit will be required. This is not a determination from any other agency. James rKing, President Board of Trustees JFK:eac James F. King,President ��oF souryo Town Hall Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Peggy A.Dickerson Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. rya Telephone(631)766-1892 Fax(631)766-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line ' 1'l day of construction % constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. all EES SOUNOLD , NQ _ 7,� ' PIE 'rkT R m Issued To Date Addr as e r THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y.:11971 TEL.: 765-1892 OFFICE LOCATION: �� SO MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex �O Olo P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 Cn ac Telephone: 631 765-1936 �O Fax: 631 765-3136 O�yCum LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner -- LWRP Coordinator L____ 1. Date: August 17, 2010 Re: SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY requests a Wetland Permit for the installation of a water transmission main in road bed of Route 25. Located: Route 25, East Marion to Browns Hill Rd., Orient The proposed local action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the below listed LWRP Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. This recommendation is based upon the responses within the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted on July 25, 2010 and the plans titled Township of Southold Plans for the Extension of Water Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion/Orient, New York dated June 17, 2009 Policy 1 Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The longstanding planning goals of the Town of Southold "reflect the interest in preserving and enhancing the natural and built environment and providing opportunities for a level of growth and expansion of the economic base that is compatible with the existing scale of development, availability of water existing sensitive environment of the Town and its historic heritage"(Town of Southold Planning Board, 1985, p3). existing scale of development, availability of water, existing sensitive environment of the Town and its historic heritage"(Town of Southold Planning Board, 1985, p3). Policy 5 Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. The purpose of this policy is to protect the quality and quantity of water in the Town of Southold. Quality considerations include both point source and non-point source pollution management so that existing and potential sources of groundwater contamination are either removed or reduced significantly. The primary quantity consideration is the maintenance of an adequate supply of potable water in the Town to supply the projected demand from residential and agricultural uses. The Town of Southold's Water Supply Management & Watershed Protection Strategy. was endorsed by the Town Board in June of 2000, and its goals and objectives are incorporated by reference into Southold's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. The Goals and Objectives are listed below: Goals 1) To protect and preserve a healthful drinking water supply sufficient to serve the existing future residents of the Town, while maintaining and enhancing the natural resources and quality of life in the town. 2) To provide public drinking water to existing residents and businesses in need without precipitating uncontrolled growth. 3) To manage future growth to ensure a sustainable drinking water supply from the Southold Township sole source aquifer. 4) To preserve the town's farming blocks in order to protect farming operations, limit the need for additional drinking water in these areas, and provide, through agricultural best management practices, a continual improvement to the groundwater quality in the area. 5) To conserve drinking water supplies by reducing wasteful water use. 6) To integrate land conservation, agricultural activities, and development control to preserve a sustainable balance between water recharge and drinking water use. 7) To constructively protect the Town's sole source aquifer from contamination by inappropriate land use practices. Objectives 1) Develop land management and zoning strategies: To prevent inappropriate land uses or practices from occurring within designated groundwater protection areas; To guild development in order to minimize its impact on the groundwater aquifer; To scale development to a level which respects the limitations of water supply. 2) Develop strategies to mitigate or remove existing threats to designated groundwater protection areas, or mitigate possible deterioration to drinking water quality, especially in private wells. r 3) Promote and guild compact, orderly growth into areas where sustainable drinking water supplies exist. 4) Preserve and protect groundwater recharge areas in and around existing and planned drinking water supply well-heads. 5) Accommodate growth and change within the Town which: respects the geographical and geological limitations to the drinking water supply; does not damage the groundwater aquifer; does not, by cumulative impact, destroy the fundamental economic base, environmental character and unique way of life which make up the quality of life in the Township of Southold. The proposed action will not conflict with the above policies stated goals and objectives. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Martin Finnegan, Town Attorney Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold Board of Trustees Application Office Use Only (� r� IIll p111�/7 Coastal Erosion Permit Application D —E C E " E Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit 11 D _Amendment/Transfer/Extension Received Application: Received Fee:$NA ✓Completed Application D _Incomplete souNlold Tarwn _SEQRA Classification: Board of Trustees Type IType II_Unlisted Coordination:(date sent) ✓LWRP Consistency As essment Form c� CAC Referral Sent o ._,(Date of Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Report. _Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: �blic Hearing Held: 1 fit) Resolution: Name of Applicant_ Suffolk County Water Authority Address 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 Phone Number:( ) 631-563-0236 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - n/a see enclosed maps Property Location: see enclosed maps (provide LILCO Pole#,distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: n/a (If applicable) Address: Phone: 7 \��® Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): n/a, approximately 17,200 linear feet Area Zoning: n/a Previous use of property: state roadway with electric..and gas utilities Intended use of property: state roadway with electric, gas, and water utilities Covenants and Restrictions: Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date see enclosed letter and permits No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? x No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): see enclosed letter, maps, EAF, permits, etc. Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: installation of water transmission main Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? 517.40(cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: 10 entry/receiving pits will be used for three directional drills; all excavations will be backfilled and restored to original condition; silt screens and hay bales will be used around entry/receiving pits and between station 38+ 60 and 46 + 70 as per enclosed plans. Approximately 820t feet of grass/dirt shoulder will be excavated using open trenching, which will be back- filled and restored as we . Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) Now negative impacts are anticipated. See enclosed EAF for full analysis. Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: installation of water tranmission main Area of wetlands on lot: n/a square feet Percent coverage of lot: n/a % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet see enclosed maps and photos Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet see enclosed maps and photos Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? 517.40 cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: as per roadbed Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: 10 entry/receiving pits will be used for three directional drills; all excavations will be backfilled and restored to original condition; silt screens and hay bales will be used around entry/receiving pits and between station an as per enclosed pans. -Approximately 820± feet of grass/dirt shoulder will be excavated using open trenching, which will be back- Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): No negative environments impacts are anticipated. There will be no impact on any wetland or tidal waters of the Town as a result of the project. Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York Deputy CEO for Operations of the Herman J. Miller / BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S),TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Sign Lure SWORN TO BEFORE ME THISJP�--DAY OF j4ft& & rLIU Notary Pu lic Timothy J. Hopkins Notary Public,State of New York No.02HO6040236 Term Expires April 17, ply— Qualified in Suffolk County D Div RI r ywtr Southhold Town ® Board of Trustees W04 Town of Southold ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE Local Law to Amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map Extending a Water Transmission Main to the Browns Hills Subdivision in Orient Prepared for: Town of Southold Town Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nelson,Pope&Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747 (631)427-5665 Dade: April 20,2010 Summary This document is an Environmental Assessment of the proposed local law to amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to allow extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills subdivision in Orient. A copy of the Legal Notice regarding the local law is provided as Appendix A. Consistent with the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map, the transmission main will supply existing development that is in need of public water supply due to contamination of local aquifers and private water supply wells. The transmission main conveys water to the area in need and only supplies existing development. The Town Board of the Town of Southold retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) for environmental consulting services, specifically to evaluate the potential for environmental impacts related to the action and for completion of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) documentation. This document provides information regarding the potential environmental impacts of this action, to assist the Town Board in issuing a determination of significance in conformance SEQRA requirements. The Browns Hills Subdivision water supply, which draws from two local wells, has been identified by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services as representing a significant public health concern that requires the extension of public water to the area. The Suffolk County A" J � • Browns lulls Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment Water Authority took over the Browns Hills community water system in 1998 and due to the high concentration of nitrates in groundwater, has installed reverse osmosis filter systems in 24 homes in the area. The filters are intended to provide safe drinking water at a single location in the home, for up to 5 gallons of consumable water per day. The proposed action, to provide safe drinking water via an extension of a transmission main to the existing water supply system, is proposed to eliminate the need for the filters, and provide safe clean drinking water to Browns Hills residents without restriction. In addition, existing developed properties adjacent to the transmission main, whose water quality may be impacted by agricultural activities, will have the option to connect to public water. Any new development in need of public water would require future amendments to the Water Supply Plan Map, separate review under SEQRA, and approval by the Town Board. Page 2 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Water Supply Management in the Town The Town of Southold has limited groundwater resources which are impacted in some areas by salt water intrusion, or by past and present land use activities which have compromised water quality. For example, groundwater has been contaminated where long term use of pesticides and fertilizers by agricultural uses has occurred, and where solid waste disposal facilities have leached pollutants. These practices have rendered groundwater unsafe for human consumption in certain areas of the Town. This is the case for some of the areas east of the Dam Pond Bridge, where the transmission main is proposed, especially the Browns Hills Subdivision which has a local water supply system served by wells that do not meet NYS Standards for drinking water. The Town of Southold adopted a Water Supply Management & Watershed Protection Strategy (WSM &WPS) in June of 2000. The Strategy was a component of a larger growth management initiative and its purpose was "To design, adopt and implement a strategy for the protection and management of the sole source aquifer of the Township of Southold. The strategy shall define the areas to be protected, areas suitable for development, areas designated for farm and agricultural protection and how the watershed will be managed in order to ensure the highest quality potable drinking water for private water supply wells and preserve rural character. " As part of the implementation of the WSM & WPS, the Town adopted a Water Supply Plan Map to show areas of existing and proposed public water supply. This map was designed to identify the existing public water distribution network that comprised the public water supply system within the Town, and proposed future extensions of the public water distribution network that the Town would recognize for installation in coordination with the SCWA. In 2006, the Town of Southold formally amended the 2000 Water Map for two reasons; to reflect the physical changes made to the water supply network; and, to set policy for the future water supply network in response to changing water supply needs and increased growth trends within the Town. Between 2000 and 2006, SCWA installed some of the originally proposed extensions of service and, at the Town's request, installed new lines in response to immediate threats to public health, safety and welfare. The SCWA Findings Statement for its Five Year Plan (2003) set forth a policy that the extension of water from transmission mains[ to undeveloped parcels would be withheld until the completion of a separate SEQRA analysis by the Town as lead agency. Undeveloped lands that are included within an Agricultural District (pursuant to New York Agriculture and Markets Law) would not be given water availability letters until a separate SEQRA analysis was performed by the Town, as lead agency, and the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets was notified of the petition for public water. Also, through Town policy, transmission mains may not be accessed by new development on currently vacant or subdividable land contiguous to the ' Transmission Mains are designed to carry large volumes of water from well sites and pumping stations to the smaller distribution lines which deliver water into smaller geographic areas. Page 3 of 10 J . • Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment mains unless the Town of Southold either previously authorized such a connection or votes in the future to allow such a connection. 1.2 Project Background The current proposal involves the construction of a 17,763 foot 12" water main to bring safe drinking water to the Browns Hills community. According to the Fact Sheet prepared by SCWA, Browns Hills is a small community of 24 homes, currently served by two very small wells. The water quality of these wells does not meet NY State standards for drinking water as the nitrate levels are over 10 parts per million. The SCWA has fitted homes in the Browns Hills Community with a single point of use reverse osmosis filter system (RO System) to treat a small volume of water. The RO System provides 5 gallons of water per day that meets the State standard for nitrate levels in drinking water. There is a special faucet installed on the kitchen sinks of these homes to access treated water. It is the only water available for drinking or cooking use in these homes. It is noted that the wells that serve this community are shallow, are located near an existing farm, and are very vulnerable to increased contamination. The system is isolated from other SCWA systems and a pump station failure would result in loss of water for the community. The proposed transmission main would connect the Browns Hills Community to SCWA's water supply system that currently serves the Town of Southold. The SCWA fact sheet notes that there are one hundred homes along the route of the proposed transmission main that would also have the option to connect to public water as a result of the project. Consistent with the Town's policy, any new development proposals will require future amendments to the Water Supply Plan Map, separate review under SEQRA, and approval by the Town Board to allow connection to the transmission main. 1.3 SEQRA Analysis The following provides an outline of the analysis completed for this review. • A Part I Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) has been prepared to provide background for this action;this is included in Appendix B. • A Part II EAF was prepared to assess the magnitude and importance of impacts(Appendix B). • An analysis of build out potential without public water availability and with public water. (Since the transmission main extends a distance of over 3 miles, the primary impact of concern involves growth potential in areas where the water main extension is proposed. However,since the project would make a future extension more feasible, the analysis considers the development potential under existing and proposed conditions for all parcels east of the Dam Pond Bridge (the westernmost point of the proposed extension). The following section describes the existing conditions and potential impacts of the proposed action. Page 4 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS For the purpose of this analysis, the study area includes all parcels to the east of the Dam Pond Bridge in East Marion, to Orient Point. Although the extension of the transmission main would occur along Main Road between Dam Pond Bridge and Browns Hill Road, the potential for theoretical future expansion to Orient Point is also considered in order to fully analyze the potential for growth due to the availability of public water. As noted previously, the proposed project only involves extension of a transmission main to Browns Hill Road and only existing development along this route would have the option to connect. As a result, this analysis is a theoretical exercise of a worst case scenario which could only occur as a result of further action by SCWA and the Town Board through separate future actions which would also be subject to SEQRA. The analysis contained herein reviews the existing mechanisms of land use control to determine the potential build out which could occur both with and without available public water in order to determine growth potential as a result of the proposed action. 2.1 Suffolk County Sanitary Code The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulates residential construction under Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and has established Groundwater Management Zones which provide minimum lot sizes for residential development (and design flow restrictions for commercial development). The entire north fork of Long Island is within Groundwater Management Zone IV. For Groundwater Management Zone IV, the minimum lot size required for a single family residence under SCSC is 20,000 SF. The allowable lot size and density does not change with the availability of public water. 2.1 Zoning Town zoning is the appropriate baseline by which to consider build out potential and potential impacts due to providing available public water. The Town ultimately determines the land use pattern and build out potential through zoning. The zoning is part of the comprehensive plan of the Town and was analyzed and subject to a Generic Environmental Impact Statement as part of the Comprehensive Implementation Strategy (CIS) in 2003. The CIS included a build out analysis which included Orient Point and the areas east of the Dam Pond Bridge. Residential zoning districts are prevalent in the study area (see Figure 1). The majority of the area is zoned R-40 or greater (minimum lot size is at least one acre per home). Additional zoning districts in the study area include R-80 (2 acre minimum lot size), R-120 (three acre minimum), R-200 (five acre lots) and business districts (HB, B, MI and MII). Residential use is permitted at various densities in all zoning districts in the study area. The Town of Southold Zoning Districts for the area east of Dam Pond Bridge are at least as strict as the SCSC with respect to minimum lot size and therefore, the zoning would prohibit increased density over what is currently permitted regardless of the SCSC and/or availability of public Page 5 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment water. The following section outlines the zoning districts in the area and the potential build out under current conditions and build out with the potential for public water for the entire area. 2.2 Protected Land The study area contains an abundance of protected land, as is illustrated on Figure 22. The study area contains 1,160 tax parcels, two of which contain primarily surface water. The total area, not including surface water, is 3,140 acres of which 1,470 acres are protected which represents a 46.8% of the entire land area (not including surface water). Out of the total 3,140 acres, approximately 1,297 acres (41.3%) are currently developed. If considered based open the number of parcels, 869 parcels of 1,158 parcels are developed (75%). Based upon the Town database, there are a total of 908 parcels (2,330 acres) that are either protected or developed without potential for subdivision 3. Table 1 provides a summary of the protected and developed parcels in the study area. TABLE 1 PROTECTED LANDS IN THE STUDY AREA Study area parcels* 1,158 3,140 Protected parcels 90 1,470 Percent protected 7.8% 46.8% Developed includes agricultural) 869 1297 Developed properties without potential for subdivision and additional residential development 818 860 Percent developed with no potential for additional development 70.6% 27.4% Protected or developed parcels (with no potential for additional development) 908 2,330 Percentage developed or protected 78.4% 74.2% * Does not include 2 underwater land parcels The relevance of protected land from the perspective of this SEQRA analysis is related to the potential for development that is presently diminished, since 46.8% of the land area is protected. The combined total of protected and existing developed land (without potential for subdivision) accounts for 74.2% of the land area, indicating that there is limited opportunity for additional development. It is expected that the Town and County will continue the program of land 2 Figure 2 shows all protected parcels in the study area,including the two parcels which are primarily underwater and therefore omitted from the calculations in this section. Including these parcels would increase the areas of protected land and thus,the percentage of protected open space in the study area. 3 Simply adding developed parcels and open space parcels does not necessarily show the area that does not have potential for change,since 51 of the developed properties have the potential for subdivision under current zoning regulations. Page 6 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment acquisition and Purchase of Development Rights. Any further development of unprotected developable lands would be controlled by Town Zoning. An analysis of the build out potential (under current zoning and with public water available) is provided in Section 2.3. 2.3 Build-Out Analysis The following analyzes the potential for additional residential lots under the current zoning, which accounts for land that is already protected. During the completion of the Town of Southold Comprehensive Implementation Strategy, the Town completed a build out analysis, which estimated the number of additional residences possible under current zoning. The analysis considered property size, zoning district (minimum lot size) and subtracted environmentally sensitive lands - which would be protected under current regulations (wetlands, coastal areas). The Town has maintained the database to account for changes. Based upon current conditions and existing zoning, there are 52 parcels east of the Dam Pond Bridge which have the potential to be subdivided, for a total of 187 additional residential lots. Table 2 provides a summary of the parcels that could be subdivided in this area. TABLE 2 POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS UNDER CURRENT CONDITIONS Zoning Minimum Lot Size under Number of Sub- Potential District current zoning dividable Parcels Additional Lots HD 20,000 SF 1 1 MII 20,000 SF * 5 11 R-200 200,000 SF 3 6 R-40 40,000 SF 7 19 R-80 80,000 SF 36 150 Total - 52 187 *Residential unit with community water;without public water,40,000 SF lot is the minimum The minimum lot size required for subdivision based upon Town zoning exceeds the requirements under SCSC, with one exception (for lots zoned Marine Business II). For the remaining 51 parcels that have potential for subdivision, the availability of public water does not affect the potential build out since the Town Zoning is more restrictive. Thus, the proposal for extension of public transmission main will not impact development potential without changes in the zoning districts for these properties. The single exception is for five properties within the Marine Business II Zoning District, a district which also allows residential use. Under the current zoning, the minimum lot size for construction of a residence within the MII Zoning District is 40,000 SF and currently there is the potential for eleven additional lots. If public water were extended to these properties, the minimum lot size for residences would be reduced to 20,000 SF and the potential build out for Page 7 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment these parcels could be increased to 22 lots4. It is noted that the likelihood of extension to these MII zoned parcels is low, as Browns Hill Road is at least 2.3 miles from the closest MII Zoned property cast of Dam Pond Bridge. Nevertheless, the potential for up to eleven additional lots over the current build out of 187 lots represents only 5.8% increase over the current build out. Lots which have potential for subdivision are illustrated on Figure 3 with the MII Marine Business zoned parcels referenced herein circled. 2.4 Hamlet Study According to the Town of Southold Hamlet Study, the Orient Hamlet Center contains all or portions of 9 parcels, totaling 1.8 acres. Although the recommendations of the Orient Vision includes the establishment of a HALO zone which would potentially allow single family residences at a density of 1 dwelling/20,000 SF, the implementation of increased density in this area would require a Change of Zone, a discretionary approval of the Town Board. The availability of public water would not increase the likelihood or feasibility of increased residential development regardless of the recommendation for a HALO zone, since the SCSC already permits residential development on 20,000 SF lots. The Town zoning requirement for all lots in the recommended HALO zone area currently exceeds this minimum lot size and a change of zone would be required to establish 20,000 SF lots. It is noted that at least 2 of the 5 parcels have more than one zoning designation which would be more restrictive than the MII Zoning provision that allows one residential lot/20,000 SF area and therefore this represents a worst case analysis with respect to build out with public water availability. Further,this analysis does not include site specific analysis as it relates to NYS DEC wetland constraints,which may further restrict lot size. Page 8 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment 3_0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Preparation of the Long EAF Part 11 identified potential impacts related to the construction of the transmission main in an area of potentially regulated freshwater/tidal wetlands and flood plains. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC) regulates activities in tidal wetlands and adjacent areas. The proposed action occurs within an existing roadbed, which is outside of the tidal wetlands jurisdictional area of the NYS DEC. However, since the transmission main will need to be installed under the Dam Pond Channel, a DEC Permit was required and has been issued. The NYS DEC permit for the project contains conditions for construction which SCWA will need to conform to in order to protect sensitive environmental resources related to Dam Pond. According to the SCWA Fact Sheet, the SCWA will use two installation techniques, horizontal directional drilling (HDD) and open cut. HDD is said to be one of the least obtrusive ways of installing mains, as it starts with drilling two holes on either end of the portion of buried main and a path is drilled underground without disturbing the waterway or land. HDD will be employed alongside the bridge on Main Road to route the main below the Dam Pond Channel (the main will be located more than 10' below the channel bottom). The area surrounding the holes will be surrounded with haybales for erosion control. Although the area of installation is within a flood zone, the construction of a water main, which is under ground,will not be impacted by flooding, nor will it impact flood potential. Page 9 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment 4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The analysis conducted by this office analyzed the proposed action, which involves the extension of a transmission main to the Browns Hills community on Browns Hill Road in Orient. The proposed action would allow for existing developed properties to connect to public water and the provision of clean safe drinking water in a community whose water supply is currently compromised. The proposed action would not result in any new development. The analysis conducted illustrates that the only potential increase in development is unlikely and not significant even if it were to occur in the future. The additional development that could occur is for residential development on MII Marine Business zoned parcels that currently could result in eleven new dwellings without public water. The availability of public water to these properties in Orient Point (which would require a substantial extension from Browns Hill Road- at least 2.3 miles) would allow for 20,000 SF lots as opposed to the current 40,000 SF lots required by the Town and build out would be increased to maximum of eleven additional lots. Any application for connection to the transmission main for new development would require a future amendment of the Town Water Supply Plan Map, which requires approval by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, a full SEQRA review and individual impacts analyzed on a site specific basis. The availability of public water will not, in and of itself, alter development patterns or result in increased density. Further, based upon the information provided regarding water quality in the shallow groundwater which is the sole drinking water source for the community it is expected that the proposed action and availability for connections by existing dwellings in the vicinity will result in significant public health, safety and welfare benefits. Page 10 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment FIGURES n6fQ�I066 v0.l�q LLC BMWRIfLL�MW V"�OYQ1TlG Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment APPENDIX A Legal Notice •B�i4pF 6 VmiiB LLC @h1POWHII'4 AMIMf �p.L)M LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, there has been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, on the 23rd day of February 2010, a Local Law entitled "A LOCAL LAW TO AMEND THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WATER SUPPLY PLAN MAP EXTENDING A WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN TO THE BROWNS HILLS SUBDIVISION IN ORIENT" and NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing on the aforesaid Local Law at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, on the 6th day of April, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. at which time all interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard. The proposed local law entitled, "A LOCAL LAW TO AMEND THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WATER SUPPLY PLAN MAP EXTENDING A WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN TO THE BROWNS HILLS SUBDIVISION IN ORIENT" reads as follows: LOCAL LAW NO. 2010 A Local Law entitled, "A Local Law to Amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map Extending a Water Transmission Main to the Browns Hills Subdivision in Orient". BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows: Section 1. Legislative Intent. This Local Law proposes to amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Historically, the Water Supply Plan Map reflects the physical changes in the water supply network since 2000. The Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services have represented to the Town that the groundwater quality of existing wells supplying the Browns Hills area are inadequate and pose a significant concern that requires the extension of public water to the area. The extension of the transmission main is intended to supply existing development only and is not intended to result in additional development pressure in the area. Section 2. Enactment. Based on the goals of the Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services to provide safe drinking water to the Browns Hills Subdivision, and upon our consideration of the recommendation of the Suffolk County Water Authority and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, the environmental consultant retained by the Town and the public comments taken at the public hearing, we hereby amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Section 3. The Southold Water Supply Plan Map as adopted by Resolution No. 31 on June 20, 2000 by the Town Board, and most recently amended by Resolution No. 2007-603, is hereby amended to reflect the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence,paragraph, section, or part of this Local Law shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the judgment shall not affect the validity of this law as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 5. Effective Date. This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State as provided by law. Dated: February 23, 2010 BY ORDER OF THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Elizabeth Neville Town Clerk Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment APPENDIX B Long EAF Parts I and II rBWa W£6 vm��uc ONMJ.BR.Y.Raiwv-c.¢]4AiM 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: El Part 1 ❑✓ Part 2 0 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑� A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Transmission Main Extension for Browns Hills Subdivision Name of Action Town Board of the Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Scott Russell Town Supervisor Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) April 20,2010 website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Transmission Main Extension for Browns Hills Subdivision Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) Main Road from Dam Pond Bridge,east to Browns Hills Road,north to existing water main location. Name of Applicant/Sponsor Town of Southold Town Board Address 53095 Main Road City/PO Southold State NY Zip Code 11971 Business Telephone Name of Owner(if different) N/A Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: The Town Board is considering adoption of a Local Law which would amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Historically,the Water Supply Plan Map reflects the physical changes in the water supply network since 2000. The Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services have represented to the Town that the groundwater quality of existing wells supplying the Browns Hills area are inadequate and pose a significant concern that requires the extension of public water to the area.The extension of the transmission main is intended to supply existing development only and is not intended to result in additional development pressure in the area. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑✓ Commercial ❑✓ Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑✓ Agriculture ✓❑Other vacant land 2. Total acreage of project area: 3,826 acres. Area of town east of the Dam Pond Bridge in East Marion(including Orient&Orient Point) APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres (No changes in developed state from proposed action) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Carver-Plymouth-Riverhead Association&Haven-Riverhead Association a. Soil drainage: ❑✓ Well drained 100% of site ❑Moderately well drained_%of site. ❑Poorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). N/A 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes ❑ No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: N/A 1:10-10%_% 1-110- 15%_% ❑ 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? E]Yes ❑ No N/A 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ❑No N/A 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) Variable g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? El Yes ❑ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ❑No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ❑No N/A Accordin to: F- I Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? E]Yes ❑ No Describe: Coastal area,narrow area of land which is improved w/Main Road which has surface water on both sides 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑ Yes EI No (proposed action to occur following roads) If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes ❑No Views of agricultural uses,Orient Harbor,Long Island Sound 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Dam Pond,wetlands associated with Orient Harbor,Gardiner's Bay,Long Island Sound b. Size (in acres): N/A Page 4 of 21 • CoRty water supply is isolated from the SCWA system. Propose is to extend SCWA System to replace existing water 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes no No supply' a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? F1 Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ❑No N/A-main will follow existing roads. 19. Is the site located in or substantial[ contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes substantial[ 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ®Yes ❑i No B. Project Description N/A 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: acres. N/A b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. N/A c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. N/A d. Length of project, in miles: +/-3.4 (if appropriate) (extension of transmission main) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. % N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? N/A h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A;No additional homes will result from proposed action. One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 17,763 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards. N/A 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ElYes ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Road restoration(to occur daily) b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No N/A c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ❑ No N/A 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes ❑ No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: t3 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ❑ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete N/A 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ED No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑� No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes HlNo If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑ Yes ❑D No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ®Yes ONo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes El No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? E]Yes ElNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Yes G1No 21, Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes ❑� No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. N/A 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.Unknown 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? no Yes ❑ No If yes, explain: SCWA has been awarded$1.9 million in Federal Stimulus funding through the NYS Drinking Water Revolving Fund. Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date Water Supply Plan City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ❑ No Map Amendment City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department ❑Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No State Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? R-40, R-80, R-200, HD, HB,MI 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Build out indicates under current zoning,an addition 187 homes could be built. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? (availability of public water) No changes in zoning proposed,however,availability of public water would decrease minimum lot size. Requirement for residences in the Marine Business Zone from 40,000 SF per residence,to 20,000 SF per residence. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? If public water were extended to Orient Point,several lots would have potential for additional residential lots,up to 11. However,this is a worst case analysis since public water would need to be extended at least 2.3 miles and some lots are constrained further with split zoning. 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ❑� Yes ❑No Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy&Orient Hamlet Study. 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Vacant land,residential,small business,marina&agricultural use. R-40,R-80,HD,HB,B zoning districts. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? �i Yes No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑ Yes El No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑Yes ❑� No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ®Yes ❑ No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes E No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Town Board of the Town of Southol Date April 20,2010 Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO YES ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ❑ ® ❑ Yes []No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ❑ ® ❑ Yes [—]No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes []No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No • Construction in a designated floodway. 0 ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) ElNO ®YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ® ® ❑Yes ❑No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑� ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposal within an existing roadway adjacent to wetlands for+/-3,500'. 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ©. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [aNO El YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ®No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ® ❑ ®Yes ❑No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ® ❑ ❑Yes ®No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? El NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ® ® ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No floodway. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? El NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs.per hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Federal list, using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ® ® []Yes []No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ® ® ❑Yes ❑No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land(includes cropland, hayfields,pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ® ❑ []Yes []No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ©No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary,use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) ❑i NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? El NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? El NO El YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ® ❑Yes [--]No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? ID NO ®YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ❑• NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ❑ ❑ []Yes []No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑. NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ❑. NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ []Yes [:]No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? El NO ®YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No hazardous substances(i.e.oil, pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes' ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No in any form(i.e.toxic, poisonous,highly reactive,radioactive, irritating,infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No Action will provide safe drinking water for at least 24 homes whose water supply currently does not meet NYS drinking water standards. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ❑ ❑ []Yes []No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ® ❑ []Yes ❑No services(e.g.schools,police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑No 20. Is there,or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ❑. NO ®YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. NSA Instructions (If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance,consider: •The probability of the impact occurring •The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value •Whether the impact can or will be controlled •The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals •Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 Legend Water Main Type — Existing vilvelrr Transmission Main (Proposed) MII Zoned Parcels with potential for subdivison are circled in yellow Subdividable Parcels y,� Source: Mal,2006:S.t ld Town GIS FIGURE 3 Browns Mills Transmission Main srAr li h=z,00orex EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION POTENTIAL SEQRA Analysis ' :1 I I I • .1 1 1 I HD R-80 .1 MENNEN Legend Water Main Type — Existing ■■■■■■■I Transmission Main (Proposed) O Zoning Districts �.. __`` v e: FSR1.3q 6aowhoW Tov GIS FIGURE 1 Browns HMIs Transmission Main TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING DISTRICTS SEQBAAnalysis Town of Southold r� Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM 115 ,Ant' PROPEIxry LOCATION: S.C.T.N.it: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A "01 yiv State Route 25 STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 3ryf'1— Te'E—' CIERTIPRIED BY A DRSION PKUFEBSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORN. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? 1 Will this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within n/a Generated by a Two(2')Inch Rainfall on Site? ❑ the Scope of Work for Proposed Construdon) (s F/�) (This item will include all run-off created by site X b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing andlor construction activities as well as all — and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed n/a Site Improvements and the permanent creation of cwtsWgbn sclivily7 Impervious surfaces.) 2 Does the St Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed PROVIDE-BRIEF PROJECT' DESCRIPTION IPmrdeAddYlone Papuan Neeeeai Structures El Stmcturea Indicating Size&Location?This X Item shah Include all Proposed Grade Changes and — Installation of water transmission Slopes Controlling Surface Water now. 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion — a main in roadbed of State Route 25 and sediment control practices that will be used to X control site erosion and storm water discharges. This as per enclosed plans. Item must be maintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. 4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or Excavation where there Is a change to the Natural Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards X of Material within any Parcel? 5 Will this Application Require Lend Disturbing Activities Encompassing an Area in Excess of Fite Thousand X (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running t hmugh the — Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jhrrlsdicho an X Gaseral DEC 81INPPP Reaulnmerds: orwithin One Hundred(100')feet Of a Welland or Submission of a SWPPP Is requited for all Construction activities Involving e01 Beach? dishrbsnus of one(1)or more acres; Including diser hences of less Men one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes❑ are pert of a larger cormnwt pan that wd ullbneWy disturb one or mom some of land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feat of Vergral Rise to Including Construction scdAtlas invovng soil disturbances bances of late than e(1)acre where One Hundred(100')Of Horizontal Distance? X Construction the DEC has deaurnined that a SPDES permit ts required for et=water discharges. (SWPPMa Shall asset the Minimum Requirements of the SPQR Geosnt Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas or other Impervious for Storm Wadar Discharges from Construction so"-Permit No,GP4.10-001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Stomn-Water Run-Off ❑ X I. The SWPPP"I be prepared prior to the WhnMel of the NOR.The NO]shah be into andlor In the direction or a Town right- Way. submitted a the Depetbtent pdorto the oorturenosmenlof construction activity. 2.The SWPPP shelf describe the smabn and sediment control practices and ahem 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, required,postconawcgm atom wow nrtagemant practloea this VAN be used andfor Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any X rxxetruced to reduce the pollutants in storm water discharges and to assum item Within the Town Right-of-Way,or Road Shoulder compliance with the terms and coadluore of this parmll.In addition.the SWPPP shah Area?tea wan am xoT hmbda as bwd,de.orodv AP—) MxrMy potential sources of paMon which may reasonably be expected to affect SM quality of storm water discharges. Nome: BArw Anawerto QrwdrrO dr hmmeAnewr.de .Ch kMrs 3.AN SWPPPs that require the postwnstmcdon More wmer menagetent practice In a Box and the construction site dlehubame Is beWaen 5000 S.F.oil Ace in ame, component shell be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed In New York a Strm4eaer,rattling,Drainage 6 Erosion Control Plan Is Required by Me Tawn M that Is knoviledgeabb in the principles and practices of Storm Water Managemard. Southold and Must be subhead for Review Prior to Issuance W Any IkAt log Punish, titers: AChrk MR(�)aMbrAmwrMeadrQwplonb PePleed rorsterrPaw ApPkarrn) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF..S......UFFOLK.................................SS Ill I ,Herman_ S. Miller .........being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, . ............................................... (items of Indaldrel eipNng Dawnantj And that he/she is the Deputx CEO for Operations ..... ................................................................................................. .(Amer.Contracicr.Agent,f:rperee OMror,sEa) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me this; ............... �.j..'e'..... d 20M NotaryPublic: .....fl... .. .. . ..................—.......................... .............. . .................... ......... tsgrewa or ) FORM - 06/10 Notary Public,State of Now York No.02HO6040236 Term Expires April 17,Mt/-- Qualified In Suffolk County ��oyog�yFFo��.�oG S Jill M. Doherty, President Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Janes F. King,Vice-President ,yy. T P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen y '� �' Southold,NY 11971 Bob Ghosio,Jr. '�/� �� Telephone(631)765-1892 John Bredemeyer 1 # y' Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD II 11 it BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1;, --------------------------------------------------------------- LJ In the Matter of the Application of LL __� SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Soutltold rasp Board of trustees COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, LkM $_ LIu l!i Ce , residing at /dba ae , �aN t�eitk being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the I.3�-Kday of 7-UtLy , 2010, I personally posted the property known as Rcr g;L 2S by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wed.,July 21, 2010 on or about 6:00 PM. Dated: (signature) Sworn to before me this �`- day of juIL, 20# 10 U,uO - Notary Publ mothy J. Hopkins Notary Public, State of New York No.02H06040236 Term Expires April 17,�; Qualified in Suffolk County' NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall , 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD:6UVokJk034% ty WSW u6WN SUB ECT OF PUBLIC HEARINGMr*tatkx41lm 0;� a r okransm SSA mach r0*4 b a 5 On tc1 � �a�tc TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: t � onora A (ADP UJec�., Ju � a , � o If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of8 a.m and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631 ) 765- 1892 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTIC& r ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIS�! Name: Address: Southold Town Board of Trustees See Attached List STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Kimberly Kennedy residing at Cedar Avenue Patchogue NY ,being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 13 day of July 20 10, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Oakdale NY 11769 that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by ertifi (registered)mail. Sworn to before me this 13 Day of ffAk , 20 l D Not >b t 20 NOTARY PU -STATE OF NEW YORK #02M16129938 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 05,20 L d i I'c: t' A < . ,J�c R',tl4dYVL NVI[ 6t+'e Occupant Katherine Lock Joseph L Townsend Jr PO BOX 624 1 RIDGE CT PO BOX 618 ORIENT NY 11957 HICKSVILLE NY 11801 GREENPORT NY 11944 Occupant Occupant Grantor Revocable Trust 1166 BRIAR WAY 1615 HILLCREST DR 19915 ROUTE 25 FORT LEE NJ 07024 EAST MARION NY 11939 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Jim Welles Irrevocable Trust PO BOX 136 PO BOX 128 20475 ROUTE 25 WASHINGTON DC 20075 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Andy Griffiths 20615 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 368 PO BOX 187 ORIENT NY 11957 BOWIE MD 20715 HIGHLAND MD 20777 Occupant Betty Macphee Richard McTighe PO BOX 33 20955 ROUTE 25 21055 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Ilene Danchig Occupant Ann F Callahan 21165 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 27 21445 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 North Dyer Limited Liability Lucinda Barnes Richard Duchano Rev Trust PO BOX 86 21955 ROUTE 25 22045 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Susan Rose Charming South Dyer Limited Liab PO BOX 364 PO BOX 292 PO BOX 192 ORIENT NY 11957 FALLS CHURCH VA 22040 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Occupant 22495 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 381 22715 MAIN RD ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Occupant 23765 ROUTE 25 23865 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 546 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ttiquettes faciles a peter A Repliez a la hachure afin de i www.avery.com 1 1e-. kh 1r evcove on cne i Sens de .A..Al-1�.,,,,__,.o__ —TM i e., 1 i lj c I i �A h fik r.!aCGf�rL bhuioµ9h ..!,rfPu' ` Peec 1<�k�'� - f ,.s�1 q rr� F_�cuFa Occupant Adolfo Alayon Aideen lAcHatnee PO BOX 246 PO BOX 94 24275 ROUTE 25 BOONES MILL VA 24065 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Samuel Pilcer 37455 ROUTE 25 24805 ROUTE 25 1230 PARK AVE APT 16C ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 NEW YORK NY 10128 Occupant Occupant Occupant PO BOX 381 25335 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 146 CHLOE WV 25235 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Beverly K Bendel 25825 ROUTE 25 26875 ROUTE 25 26025 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Occupant PO BOX 325 27295 ROUTE 25 27495 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Occupant PO BOX 395 PO BOX 92 27965 ROUTE 25 LAUREL NY 11948 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Norine Mudd Edmund Louis Papantonio Occupant 22540 ROUTE 25 1615 SPRING VALLEY RD 22950 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 OSSINING NY 10562 ORIENT NY 11957 Terese Pette Occupant Occupant PO BOX 754 23600 ROUTE 25 23650 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Occupant PO BOX 105 205 WILLETS AVE PO BOX 444 ORIENT NY 11957 W HEMPSTEAD NY 11552 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Occupant 45 PLATT RD 25100 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 104 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Etiquettes faciles a peter i A Repliez A la hachure An del www.avery.com i Utilisez le aabarit AVERY®51600 i ,Sens de ra„ainr In rnhnrel an..i InTM ! 1_Ynn_G n_A VC OV i I Il a IbhuC—'i [C U _FpJL {v�l It'frit lo-n i,iC�-IC• � hcxeel 6'EI � � ���._d� i i Y Occupant Occupant Occupant 25650 ROUTE 25 25760 ROUTE 25 26700 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Peter Grippe 27300 ROUTE 25 27840 ROUTE 25 28100 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Occupant Occupant Occupant 28280 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 582 28545 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 Paul Fried Occupant Edmond D Franco 172 CLINTON ST PO BOX 377 15919 ROUTE 25 BROOKLYN NY 11201 EAST MARION NY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 Occupant Gregory Michelakis Joyce Orrigo 132 98TH ST 65-27 171 ST ST 15925 ROUTE 25 BROOKLYN NY 11209 FRESH MEADOWS NY 11365 EAST MARION NY 11939 Occupant Adolfo Alayon Anthony Bollention Family Trust 16315 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 94 PO BOX 537 EAST MARION NY 11939 FAIRVIEW PA 16415 EAST MARION NY 11939 Ioannou Qualified Occupant Ronald Edeen 16855 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 26 11205 ROUTE 25 EAST MARION NY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 Occupant Occupant Occupant PO BOX 335 67 GOODWIN AVE 11915 ROUTE 25 EAST MARION NY 11939 STATEN ISLAND NY 10314 EAST MARION NY 11939 William Kennedy III Mohammed Sherif Occupant 12005 ROUTE 25 400 E 89TH ST 9452 240TH ST EAST MARION NY 11939 NEW YORK NY 10128 FLORAL PARK NY 11001 Helen Hartofelis Occupant Sonja Caron 12315 ROUTE 25 12395 ROUTE 25 12785 ROUTE 25 EAST MARION NY It 939 EAST MARION NY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 Etiquettes faciles a peler i I Repliez 1 la hachure afin de I www.avery.com lJtilicwz la naharit AVFRV®516n® I Sens de r5.,51nr le.bl.,..d y.�..., i �1Vrglt mA^[rlI;� Pi. ✓ :dil p-i Occupant Occupani Occupant 12935 ROUTE 25 13135 ROUTE 25 10940 ROUTE 25 EAST MARION IVY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 Vicky Stavrolakes Artemios Tsismenakis Deborah A Kusa 11120 ROUTE 25 1701 E 22ND ST 11360 ROUTE 25 EAST MARION NY 11939 BROOKLYN NY 11229 EAST MARION NY 11939 Raffi Asadorian Hall Family Nominee Trust Susan Todd 415 E 52ND ST APT DB 1175 W HILL RD 11930 ROUTE 25 NEW YORK NY 10022 SOUTHOLD NY 11971 EAST MARION NY 11939 Elizabeth Bramson Richard McKinney Sophia Antoniadis 54 CEDAR LANE WAY 44 W 77TH ST APT 8E 12500 ROUTE 25 BOSTON MA 02108 GREAT NECK NY 11024 EAST MARION NY 11939 Occupant Occupant Occupant 12580 ROUTE 25 12860 ROUTE 25 12960 ROUTE 25 EAST MARION NY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 Occupant Occupant Occupant 134 76TH ST 12680 ROUTE 25 PO BOX 13 BROOKLYN NY 11209 EAST MARION NY 11939 EAST MARION NY 11939 Etiquettes faciles a peter A Repliez A la hachure afin de wuvw.avery.com ' Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 Sens de' reveler le rebord Po U rM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY '} thargement P- P } x NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Suffolk County Water Authority SCTM# Route 25 between East Marion and Browns Hills Road, Orient YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: issue permits for installation of a water transmission main in roadbed of Route 25 between East Marion and Browns Hills Road, Orient 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: roadbed of Route 25 between East Marion and Browns Hills Road, Orient . 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 96,111 and/or 275 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: DATE: July 21, 2010 - on or about 6:00 p.m. You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. PROPERTY OWNERS NAME: Suffolk County water Authority MAILING ADDRESS: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 PHONE#: 631-563-0236 AGENT: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE #: Enc: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. -,zs. v . t _ p . l t i cur MR DETAILS +..ro eeat�� / f, 17RiENF r HARBaR \C .t•.. -.� r / EA OF �Y;n OF ROADWAY /�/ WORK • xa5roe PG I"[ti3 Nk i K Yu:,YP LOCATION MAP SCALE NT& REVISED 02-10-2010 REVISED 01 -25-2010 REVISED 11 -16-2009 SHEET TS-1 REVISED 9-3-2009 1 OF 64 NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, LL ZONE 3104; AATUM. NAD.1927 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Suffolk County Water Authority SCTM# State Route 25 between East Marion and Browns Hills Road, Orient YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: l. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: install a water transmission main. 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: State Route 25 between East Marion and Browns Hills Road, Orient 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, and/or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME: Suffolk County Water Authority MAILING ADDRESS: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 PHONE#: 631-563-0236 Enc: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OFSUFFOLK , residing at , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names;that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold;that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this Day of 20 Notary Public APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOURNAME: Suffolk County Water Authority (Last name,first time,middle initial,unless you are applying in the time of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other Person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee X Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through you company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of ,qL 20#A) Signature Print Name Herman J. Miller Form TS 1 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS I. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# n/a - - The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board © Planning Dept. E Building Dept. E Board of Trustees I. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital 0 construction,planning activity,agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit,approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Installation of water transmission main in roadbed of Route 25 Location of action: State Route 25 between East Marion and Browns Hills Road, Orient Site acreage: n/a Presentlanduse: state roadway with electric and gas utilities Present zoning classification: n/a 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Suffolk County Water Authority (b) Mailing address: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) 631-563-0236 (d) Application number, if any: n/a Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑X No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? see enclosed letter and permits DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable See analysis in EAF.enclosed herewith. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria © Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable See letter from New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria F Yes 0 No © Not Applicable Project involves no visible above-ground structures. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section HI-Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 11 Yes 0 No © Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria © Yes Ed No IE Not Applicable Project will provide clean public water supplies to existing structures and residences along the route of the transmission main. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes E No 0 Not Applicable See analysis in enclosed EAF. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No E Not Applicable Project will reduce the need for private water filters along the route of the transmission main. Such filters concentrate contaminants and discharge them to the groundwater environment, which in turn leaches into coastal waters and wetiand areas. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. 0 YeLl No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. © Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Project will provide clean drinking water supplies to existing water dependent uses along the route of the transmission main. Project will provide fire protection to water dependent uses along the route of the transmission main. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. © Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Project will reduce the need for private water filters along the route of the transmission main. Such filters concentrate contaminants and discharge them to the groundwater environment, which in turn leaches into coastal waters and wetland areas. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. a Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable Project is a water transmission main — no new development may hook up to the main, only existing structures and residences. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. a Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Created on 5125105 11:20 AM SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Timothy J. Hopkins Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 General Counsel (631)563-0236 Fax(631)563-0370 June 25, 2010 rJUNI Jill Doherty, President 2 5 2010 Town of Southold Board of Trustees euthhnid Town Town Hall Annex Building Board o1 Trustees 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Dear Ms. Doherty: On April 22, 2010, the Southold Town Attorney sent a letter to the Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA) with respect to the above referenced project stating the following: With respect to required approvals, although the Board of Trustees issued to the SCWA an administrative permit in July 2009 for the Authority to undertake directional drilling under Dam Pond, it has come to the attention of the Board of Trustees through public disclosures made in connection with the Town Board's consideration of an amendment to the Town's Water Map that additional approvals may be required from the Board of Trustees. It is clear that certain sections of the proposed water transmission main extension between Dam Pond and Browns Hills are within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees and, since the administrative permit was granted for the limited scope of work entailing the directional drilling under Dam Pond, any installation contemplated beyond the Dam Pond area will require a Wetlands Permit pursuant to Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The letter went on to request that the SCWA amend its application to the Board of Trustees so that the requisite review of the entire action can proceed. A copy of the letter is enclosed for June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road(NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 2 your convenience. Since January 2001, the Town of Southold indicated that the no direct application for a wetlands permit need be made by the SCWA for water main projects that do not include directional drilling under a water body. The procedure was to simply have the highway department review the SCWA plans for road opening permits, and based upon those plans and meetings in the field and/or information provided by the SCWA line-up inspector, the highway department would advise the Board of Trustees and either accept or reject the SCWA proposal for erosion control (haybales/silt screens). A copy of a SCWA Memorandum regarding this procedure is enclosed. That procedure has been followed by the SCWA and the Town since that time. In any event, in accordance with Mr. Finnegan's request and in the spirit of cooperation and coordination and to facilitate the provision of badly needed public water supplies to residents of the Town of Southold along the route of the proposed water main and to improve drinking water quality in the Browns Hills subdivision, please consider this an amendment of the application to the Board of Trustees regarding the above referenced application. The SCWA also respectfully reserves its legal rights with respect to this application and the issue of jurisdiction over the project by the Board of Trustees. As you are probably aware, the SCWA and the Board of Trustees has already treated this project as a Type II action under SEQR because it involves the extension of utility distribution facilities to an existing subdivision as per the statewide SEQR Type Il list. An Article 78 proceeding challenging this determination was dismissed affirming the determination that the project is a Type II action. You may not be aware of the fact that the Southold Town Board had an outside consultant prepare a SEQR long environmental assessment form for this project prior to the court decision. A copy of the same is enclosed for your reference. The Long EAF prepared for the Town Board includes an analysis of potential impacts related to the construction of the transmission main in an area of potentially regulated freshwater/tidal wetlands and flood plains at page 9. Part 2 of the Long EAF at page 12 of 21 indicates that the transmission main will not affect any water body designated as protected. Part 3 of the Long EAF concludes: The proposed action would not result in any new development. June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 3 The availability of public water will not, in and of itself, alter development patterns or result in increased density. Further, based upon the information provided regarding water quality in the shallow groundwater which is the sole drinking water source for the community it is expected that the proposed action and availability for connections by existing dwellings in the vicinity will result in significant public health, safety and welfare benefits. Also enclosed is a copy of the Plans for the Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion/Orient,New York dated June 17, 2009 (hereinafter"Plans"). These Plans indicate the entire route of the proposed water main. Please note that the directional drill under Dam Pond starts on page C-4 at distance 21+50 and ends on page C-5 at distance 26+00. This is the portion of the project for which the Board of Trustees has already issued an administrative permit. The Plans show two additional directional drills identified as Alternative Drill #1 and Alternative Drill #2. Instead of open cutting the roadbed near wetland areas, the SCWA will be installing additional portions of the water main utilizing the alternative directional drill method. This is the same installation method that was approved by the Board of Trustees for the section of the main going under Dam Pond. Alternative Drill #1 starts on page C-5 at distance 26+00, which is the location where the Dam Pond directional drill ended. Alternative Drill #1 ends on page C-6 at location 38+60. Alternative Drill #2 starts on page C-7 at location 46+70 and ends on page C-13 at location 85+50. Alternative Drill #1 and#2 will be exclusively within the roadbed and will not go under any water bodies. Also enclosed are other permits for the project for your reference. First, there is a letter from the US Army Corps of Engineers indicating that the project may be performed under the nationwide permit. The Army Corps of Engineers has indicated that it does not have jurisdiction over the portion of the project located in the road right of way. Second, there is a copy of the permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation("DEC") for the Dam Pond portion of the project. Third, there is a copy of the SCWA's DEC general permit for the project. The DEC general permit applies to the installation of water mains within existing roadways and within five feet of the roadway shoulder June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road(NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 4 near fresh and tidal wetlands. All of the proposed project falls within this definition with the exception of the Dam Pond directional drill portion of the project (which received a separate DEC permit as noted above). When the SCWA has a project falling under its DEC general permit, the SCWA sends a letter notifying the DEC. The notification includes project location maps and photographs of the site and adjacent wetlands. Enclosed is a copy of the maps and photographs that were sent to the DEC for this project in accordance with the SCWA's DEC general permit. Fourth, there is a copy of the New York State Department of Transportation Highway Work Permit for the project. Fifth, there is a copy of a letter from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation which indicates that the proposed project will have no adverse effect on historic or cultural resources eligible for listing or listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Sixth, enclosed for you convenience is a copy of the Administrative Permit that was issued for the Dam Pond portion of the project by the Board of Trustees on July 22, 2009. In addition to the above referenced documents,please find a Town of Southold Board of Trustees Application, including General Data, Coastal Erosion Application Data, Wetlands/Trustee Lands Application Data, Applicant/Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, and Erosion, Sedimentation& Storm- Water Run-Off Assessment Form. Should you need any additional information,please let me know. Very truly y urs, Timothy J. p ns Enclosures (three copies of each) MARTIN D.FINNE& TOWNATTORNEY SCOTTA. RUSSELL martin.fint)rgan@town.southold.ny.us of SU Ujyo Supervisor JEANT AT TOWN RAN ATTORNEY DRD ASSISTANT ` Town Hall Annex,54375 Route 25 Jennifer.ancWuro@town.southold.ny.us P.O. Box 1179 Lf 1RI M.HI)LSI3 Southold,New York 11971-0959 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY r Telephone(631) 765-1939 lori.hul6e@town.southold.ny.us ' Facsimile(631) 765-6639 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 2 �n April 22, 2010 D E C EU D JUN 2 5 �'.. Mr. Stephen M. Jones, Chief Executive Officer SUffOlk County Water Authority southhold Town 46"Sunrise Highway Board of Trustees Oakdale, NY 1176"901 RE: Board of Trustees/Administrative Permit for Directional Drilling Beneath Dam Pond Dear Mr. Jones: As I trust you are aware, the Town Board declined to adopt the proposed local law amending the Town's Water Supply Map pending the adoption of the Town's updated Comprehensive Plan and the submission by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) of proof of the demand for public water by the residents of Orient As such, the Town of Southold maintains that the Installation of any portion of the water main is prohibited at this time in accordance with the long standing and well established agreement by the SCWA to defer to the Town's authorization of any water main extensions. With respect to other required approvals, although the Board of Trustees issued the SCWA an administrative permit In July 2009 for the Authority to undertake directional drilling under Dam Pond, it has come to the attention of the Board of Trustees through public disclosures made in connection with the Town Board's consideration of an amendment to the Town's Water Map that additional approvals may be required from the Board of Trustees. It Is Gear that certain sections of the proposed water transmission main extension between Dam Pond and Browns Hills are within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees and, since the administrative permit was granted for the limited scope of work entailing the directional drilling under Dam Pond, any installation contemplated beyond the Dam Pond area will require a Wetlands Permit pursuant to Chapter 275 of the NYS Departd Town Code. We are also ment of Environmental Conservation and the that the Army Corpof previously issued by the likewise limited to the directional drilling under Dam Pond. y of Engineers are As I am sure you would agree, it is inappropriate and contrary to the mandates of the Environmental Conservation Law and related rdgulations to obtain permits for a proposed action in a piecemeal fashion. We would respectfully request that the SCWA Mr. Stephen M. Jones April 22, 2010 Page 2 review the existing permits, to the extent they are valid, and amend your application to the Board of Trustees so that the requisite review of the entire action can proceed. Please be advised that no further action should be taken with respect to the proposed water main extension until all required approvals are obtained and the Water Supply Map is formally amended by the adoption of a local law by the Town Board. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. b truly rs, rtin D. 1=1 an To eY MDF/Ik co: Timothy J. Hopkins, Esq. Members of the Town Board Members of the Board of Trustees Mr. Damon Rallis, Zoning Inspector Ms. Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk D E C E D Southhold Town Board of Trustees lurr�Q � TO: FILE FROM: Timothy J.Kilcommons,A.E. Supt. of Distribution Coast DATE: January 12,2001 SUBJECT: Town of Southold Wetlands Permit As Per my conversation of 1/12/01 with James Richter of the Town of Southold,no direct application for a wetlands permit need be made for pipeline projectt�� ich do not include ,wh directional drilling The procedure will simply continue to be that Uslichter and Jacobs will review the plans SCWA submits for the road opening permits,and based upon those plans, and the meetings in the field and/or the information provided by our line-up inspector,they will advise the 5outhold'Nstees and either accept or inject or proposal for erosion control (haybales/sih screen). 1 abed 00000-000-000 aT7:rn nrn7ji7 vim, SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AITTHORIY Steven T. Bums, P.E. Director ofDht7bution 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 1171 (631)563-02( Fax(631)589.52i Regional Manager D Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection �'N 2 5 9 NYS Dept of Environmental Conservation 2010 SUNY Campus Bldg. 40 Stony Brook NY 11790-2356 Board Of Trusetees Dear Sir: In accordance with our general permit No. 1-4700-00010/00424LO dated 212g1/s notifying you of a project that is within 300 feet of a tidal wetland, i we are Projecttitle: UMS rib. /O—QO -r2')S/4r 51 / /O/LIF,•T Project Engineer: ,/f1M s'�� Phone#: �! Expected Commencement Date: AP/�� � ,,2/1/0 Expected Duration: /*/ 20/6 To: Vk/ /�, ZO// SCWA Authorization Number: Very truly yours, SUFF COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Frederic C. Berg, Su ntendent FB/bb Enclosures: 1) Project location map 2) Photographs of site& adjacent wetlands tidal.wpd 46 4T 48' �1 f � ORIEM P.6.ARION Ps MOW SUB t � P.Y Yn.'�NUSx q 43 6 ]]y e i f.WIGAIT E I 4 2 an pEV cowry py a c�,. J.- nriPC. 1 " 11 Q �.r i 1M „i 11 1 11 11 ♦ l • r -. ... a .. .i.... T,. .. .. 1 h. 11 � , `� p, ice* •,�; �' , a r� I � /y , �! � WAY� -M�:: � • � Y1� p ' Ak I - P;1. 11 1 11 11• j I of LL 11 1 11 11� ' Y � , rt r: 11 1 11 11' ' �, • - s t -� �,ti � ,. , :, I � r E �' _ � w �' �f ''. n 1. 1 F� �'i � a�. M v in'� ,: ���� �u`.-^ '. s .,. ; � � .. ^,.` i WBS-005-10-00-0049 SR-25 East Marion- Orient Sheet C-8 IV ti rG , 14i ;.. �f +M L ky' P 0 5 9 WBS-005-10-00-0049 SR-25 East Marion- Orient Sheet(C-10) 10 WBS-005-10-00-0049 East Marion- Orient .r; Sheet C-10 -.. � __ ,_ � � b �Nib• Y Hwy.. 11 1 11 11� ' � r 1- w t.r max-.., ......... i x e<- t n `� rq 11 11 11� • S d r 1 .tea �'+A rv4Nk - 3 v lLplp 1 * 1. 11 1 11 11� � F R z i U t�n * s ly I e 'ftSi. L C 11 1 11 1 � p l tiA 1 EA9i MAR,N. ��,�� a �7�.• ff is T' U U,'P "p L 40b ftk jEu ',44 TO N It a CL 12" VALVE & BOX 4" 4 1 13 It �T IYGI 2G' Of [ Q ! / It HYDRANT#795038000 # H—V= V—M= BURY= ±6000' E/0 TRUMANS PATH f 0 _77 Y 12- 45- BEND (ANC.) iil l / lto / / :o r/ / , // �! / 12" 45' BEND (ANC.) 1! Ila It, 1�>12- 45- BEND (ANC.) 12- 45 BEND (ANC.) /,v STEAMER HYDRANT 120 X 6* TEE (ANC.) '23.3/ 06" DUC71LE IRON PIPE 6" VALVE & BOX tie6" RETAINER GLAND BASEBLOK GRAVEL ONATIONC STANDARD STANDARD THREAD ONEW PORK #31 THREAD OR T HYDT ORDER No, 200002284 4", - HYDT. PROJ, 025-10-00-0151 EASY MARION HYDT. ORDER No, 200002283 -- HYDT. PROJ. 025-10-00-C)148 CONTRACTOR COPY NO M COORDINATE SYSTEM: N Y. STATE TE PLANE FEEr, L I ZONE 3104, DATUM: N.Aff Vil: INSPECTOR COPY ' Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highwcl, 4 S TORFKEEPER COPYype Oakdale, NY 11769 wg� 0.- WATER MAJWJNSTALLA7TON(STATE ROAD 25) C_ Li Rderence T MARION -All restoration on N.V.S. Id. Sketch By D '10 C—(7 Dafe.218110 own By.A4A8 Octe.218110 fawn:EAST MARION R 0.W. to be done to N.y S. AS NOTED specs. field Prep By. Insp 6 0, hp U 11 Ins By Scale:1"=40' heel 10 Of 29 L."s -0 FOL 5heel 10 Of 29 ro*�ship:SOU THOLD 4 4 ap 0 �T �3 , ( 4 N I _�es 4W No 2 3 T 23U Ser�0,der No Y bends I of Sewes: ine Oist:EAcr VARION FO)49 be required Seloce Dal,: Ord m roject 005_t 0_00_0() 5 q,� Order No.20o00225l In Project:005-W-00-0049 compt. owq. O�. n,,. 11 . ---I--------- . N J -o� � r- �' � Imp II�GII�'J/� ,✓ / `` bova &I r ell r - JET PLI 27 " / ��' UC/ CF7JTfF.Lf1JE SEE H" lzi / G /:;•' A HYDRANT#795039000 / �/11 / �L /t7000' E/0 7RUMANS PATH / <� l / EXIST. RETAINING F / 4. . x, INING WALL z O / a u P n / O i- If/P / zob 'b l' / e/> / �; ;i / STEAMER HYDRANT P� , ' / O12e X 6" TEE (ANC.) 6" DUCTILE IRON PIPE / �1�� 6" VALVE & BOX / ' °%y • 2?6/ 6" RETAINER GLAND / BASEBLOCK & GRAVEL UNA f10NA LSTit NAR ®NEW YORK #31 THREAD READ / y / ORIENT POINT HYDT. ORDER No. 200002284 — HYDT. PROD. 025-10-00-0151 EAST MARION HYDT. ORDER No. 200002283 — HYDT. PROJ. 025-10-00-0148 CONTRACTOR COPY _ (� NOTE CI)ORDINAT,E SYSTEM.TEM. N.Y. STA>F PLANE FEET,, LJ. ZONE J104; DATUM: N.A.D.f92 / INSPECTOR COPY -� Suffolk County Water Authori 4060 Sunrise Highwoy STOREKEEPER COPY me ralec t Oakdale, NY 11769 N—te5 — WATER STATE ROAD2S w Reference ININST---'`���T�ON 9 a.: C— 1 —All restoration On N.Y.S. Authnr��ations Fld. S.e(r.h@y Dafe.� R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S, AS NOTED 218/10 rdwn oyAl Dofe,2/8j10 r--:EAST MARION ield Prep @X Insp. BY Scde:l"� 40' - _. Sheet 11 Of 29 Township:SOUTHOLD __-_____ Contractor 6lnp Nu 2.3T 23U Sery Order No: -Mice. bends Rc of1� "----- / of Sevices: ire Dist:EAST MARION FO gels may --------- be required In Service Dafe_ ain Cyder No'200f70ZZS1 .,..... N OF �2" Ii.D•P E' pRR\ 170 0\RECT\ONA\- �`-- 66 t PIPE pE F \RON1�IPE _ —A\ op -t p / /,,. � .. R.C.P. CULVERT PIPE / 152 al 00' Agy ....../ / •�JGL S �TU V�t1GL or / /- /N,�P / •; ORIENT POINT HYDT. ORDER No. 200002284 - HYDL PROD. 025-10-00-015' \ EAST MARION H1'DT ORDER No. 200002283 - HYDT. PROD. 025-10-00-014r NOTEN.Y.COORDINATE SYSTEM- N STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104, DATUM: N.AD,-- INSPECTOR COPY 1•. / ,;. CONTRACTOR COPY 1�7��� Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise High w.• " '-'W" ' Oakdale, NY 11769 j aRc STOREKEEPER EEPER coat We WATEIj MAIN INSTALLA77ON STATE ROAD 95J W' C- S / u�nowfl(,gop d. Sketch By Dore:218110 oven ByMAB Date:2�8�10 iown:EAST MARION J., -All restoration on N.Y-,. AS NOfFD N.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. rda Prep ey. insp. By stole,1"=40' Sheer i2 or 29 rownsnp:SOUTHOLD specs, anlructar.' Map Na:2jT 2jIJ Serv.O,jer No / o/ Sevic Is: ire Dist EAST MARION FO - Mfsc, bends °,�. offsets moy _--.— -- - n Service Dole' be required --- __ oln Order rm:200002291 om Prareat:005-10-00-0049 Compl. Ueg. By oars: ydI Order Na:SEE ABOVE ydt Proieet:SEE ABOVE LE PA tq I 12' VALVE & BOX wlg#/i* ell— SEE "i" GHYDRANf'#"1000 H—V= V—M- BURY= ±8000' EIO TRUMANS 0A1 i N. ....... U.P.E. 150 Of 12 U/P PIPE ouc-mt S PIPE Ir LD .VOW w-w .W-w U/P ,WW ------- pC1- wwoo' vA, Wow ... ............ -- ----------------------------------------------- 66 "',[ E LOI-1, N RHBBE S Of r Of f DPE f1F INTO FND OF 12' wo-� ,Z • WH[N COM"Ur IL IL D V.- R.C.P. CULVERT PIPE X S _ FEPAIN T f-OR UM11 END 0 W TE F f AL 1_. .1 E)p r JF A ro STEAMER HYDRANT 12X 6- fEE (ANC.) 6" DUCTILE IRON PIPE 6" VALVE & BOX 6" RETAINER GLAND BASEBLOCK & GRAVEL ONATIONAL STANDARD THREAD ®NEW YORK #31 THREAD ORIENT POINT HYDT. ORDER No. 200002284 — H*i'[)T. PROD. 025-10-00-0151 EAST MARION HYDT. OPUER No. 200002283 — HYDT. PROJ. 025-10-00-0148 CONTRACTOR Copy —NOTE-' COORDINATE SYSTEM.- N.Y. STA IE PLANE FEET. L.I. ZONE 3104; DA ILlAd. N.A.D.191- INSPECTOR COPY SuffOlk COLMtY Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway 'Pe r Oakdale, NY 11769 STOREKEEPER COPY WA MAIN RYSTAL 7 ATTON 1`19—te.5E --- Ref�-erc 'MTEROAD25) C-03) AM restoration on N.Y.S. AUth,,jtot,�65 Id. Sketch - Dnre:2/g�10 coven --- = R-0 W. to be done to tl y.S, AS NOTE-0 ta Dote.--216�110 Tow-:EASr 44ARIONIORIENT POINT 'eld specs. Prep BY. Insp. Ity. Scale.1"=40' Sheet IJ Of 29 To—ship:SOUTHOLD Misc bends, & offsets may Cont,actor.-- Mop No:23T 23USnvord� No -- I of gevices e Dist:ORIENT POINT FO be �q,trpd Ser'Ce Oate Voin Ordw No 200002-2 51 otn Propect.005-10-00-0049 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 45' OF A $�1 7S aF S�LTSCa �h�AYS TOTAL OF 430' OF 12" H.D.P.E. ar.. A 'J r i i IA t.,.; \)}� �J� •�a'l✓/J�'fj N START OF DIRECTIONAL DRILL 'l F" Palr•I- 1: 12" VALVE & BOX � � A/ HYDRANTj795034000- ---- N10235 O V-M 'i rJI>i TrE;NF 12"BURY= T:FTit FEt2000' E 0 TRUMANS PATH 1'17 Ile I .INTO Ri,IBBFRS , L:F 'WA iLK MAIhJ /P , „y IF '• � ., � rya If P /U/1 /12336 �i /CJ / i / / .; i i' i h�% � 1iC / h , � M,p U/Y W / NEST STEAMER HYDRANT p ' / #12se0 / / A 12' X 6' TEE .ANC. x a � �' / O 6' DUCTILE IRON PIPE 6' RETAINER BOX BASEBLOCK & GRAVEL ❑NATIONAL STANDARD THREAC ®NEW YORK #31 7I4READ f\ ORIENT POINT HYDT. ORDER No. 200002284 - HYDT. PROJ. 025-10-00-015- \ EAST MARION I-IYDT. ORDER No. 200002283 - HYDT. PRO•J. 025-10-00-014F / IL �� L� CONTRACTOR COPYNOTE: COOROINA TE 5YS TEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE rEE T• L.1. ZONE 3104; OA TUM: N.A OSuffolk County Water Authority '060 SDnrse Hlyhw INSPECTOR COPY Oakdole, NY 11769 STOREKEEPER COPY T- raWAMRMAININSTALLATION STATEROAD 25 w' a C— 4 Reer— All Nestor otion on N.Y.S. -- .. lufhor¢at cns Itl. Sketch By Dofe:218�ID yawn By M4B Dote:2/8110 rnwn:EAST MARION R 0 N, to be done to N.Y.S. AS NC'FD told Pr,p Br loFp. By. Scote.1"=40' ;heel ? OT29 Townsh;p:SOUTHCLD SOuthh0ld Town c4e.., - —.--- - _______ ROartl Of TfUSt08S Contrxfnr: Map No23T 230Serv.Order No" ® of Scv'ces: ire Dist:EAST MARIp1J FD — _ i Mis hpn ds & r f'set. maY n -ervse O"fe. Mom '),der No ,'00002`?be requ;red _I 1 Ilain Project:005-10-00-0049 Compl. Dwq BY Dnfew nw... . prr ..�,. ,r / 2,61 aF 've U4 sic.-' Not, #SAGS 440"-04b Dot/GG m4c#1l a° IN;TALI. VALVE BETWEEN DRILLS 12" VALVE h BOX A_4� A., % �SEE PAINT FOR LIMIT "�/ DIRECTIONAL DRILL 85 OF A TOTAL " :' �. ,' /i' hG OF 430' OF 12" H.D.P.E. j,' „ /, r ..,, dill lll�/ /151/ Ci F PAJ'•i f.rJR t.IM1T ;� c S TART OF ALTERNATE (�!1) z`J RECTIONAL DRILL OF / " H.D.PEOF A TOTAL 1245, 1.. / ORIENT POINT HYDT. ORDER No. 200002284 — HYDT. PROJ. 025-10-00-0151 EAST MARION HYDT. ORDER No. 200002283 — HYDT. PROJ. 025-10-00-0148 / NOTE: COO DINA IE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, l.l. ZONE Jf04; OA iUM: N.A.0.14.'� CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County G / INSPECTOR COPY - Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highwa,, STOREKEEPER COPY ype 'oleo Oakdale. NY 11769 WATER MAININST/ Aj.L.ATTON STATE ROAD 2S "" a Notes: Relnmce C�(S —All restoration on N.Y.S. qof llzatlore d. -%etch BY 0ate218110 raw- OrMAB Date.2/8/10 town:EAST MARION R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NO IED ;ad prep By. Insp. Bg Scalerl"=40' Specs. — Sheet 5 Or 29 Townshrp:50t/THOLD -- _ Cmhoctar: Atop Na:2JT 23Usneader No: —Mist. bends & offsets may '— s Sevices: ire Dist EAST MARION F"D be requirr?d -_—__._____ n Service Dare: Ilaln Order No:200002251 ---- an Project:005-10-00-0049 � Ail L12" HD,_-'E 'V'kEfj -E�' FlAiNT FOR LIMIT ENE) DF ALTERNATE (#I) DIRECTIONAL DRILL OF OF 1245' CLNILP -X/ 1 0 CENT ERLIM HYDRANT#7950,35000 131-V IS I I JOF E OF STEAMER HYDRANT 6" DUCTILE IRON PIPE 6" RETAINER GLAND BASEBLOC ONATIONAL STANDARD THREAD uunE° /"nn #3/ .nnc°u 0R|EmT POINT HYP[ ORDER No. 2O0oO2284 - HYDT� PRQ1 025-10-80~015t � [�5Tk�AR0N hYDT �RDER �o 2OU�0Z2OJ �- HY0l� PR0J 025-10-00-014F - - ' � � CONTRACFOR Copy NOTE. COORDINA 7E SYSTEM, N.Y STA T PLANE FEEF, L.I. ZONE 3f04,, DA rUm: N.A.D.I? SrOf,'FKEEPFR COPY WATER MAWRYSTALL47TON(STATE ROAD 25) W9. C-(6,1 _____ -m| restoration voNx1 � � v0w' /o �euv" | n / S� � o � 'Peco �misc bends & o/(n~tomay 1 / 12" 45' BEND (.ANC.) N 12" 45' BEND (ANC.) 00, " e S _,E1 HYDT LN IT ,LL •H,� a: / OHYDRANT795037000 \- BURY= \ /0 15000' E/0 TRUMANS PATH / /-<) s �� •• %. Al r� I , , , O �STEAMER HYDRANT 12' X 6" TEE (ANC.) / ovt �oe /i /; 6" DUCTILE IRON PIPE - 6' VALVE & BOX 6" RETAINER GLAND / BASEBLOCK & GRAVEL ! / ONA17ONAL STANDARD THREAD O NEW YORK #31 THREAD ORIENT POINT HYDT. ORDER 40. 200002284 — H (DT- PROJ, 025-10-00-01^7 7 / J EAST MARION HYDT. ORDER No. 200002283 — HYDT. PROD. 025-10-00-0143 7S;TOPEKFFPFR RACTOR COPY - _ Q NOTE: CO)ROINATE SYSTEM' N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.l. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.AD 192 -'.. CTOR DOPY �• Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highwa, EKFFPFR COPY wT--eZTF rl o� Ookdole, NY 17769 - WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD ZSRe/erm!'e /'� p�rn lion on N.Y,$. Aulhor/zoom ___ Id. Skelch BY Dale:2%B110 yarn BY MAB Dofe218/10 Town:EAST MAR/ONl� d be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED ielQ Prep 9Y Insp. BX SCa/e:1 4O'- Sheet 7 OT 19 TownShp S UTHOLD Ccn trocfw Aloe Na:2.3T 2JU sere order No D- - Y oT ;eHcas:ds 4c offsets mny ------ - ___ ee Ost [AST MARIGN FD-.] In Serdre Dafe: ne, Order No 2J"I l�: 002251 r..... S� O„ 77 i / " ,r / I '.p 11 e. F l�/ I' i 5 `4 /o 12" 45' BEND (ANC.) Cl 12" 45' BEND (ANC.) / / tiQi it / if h .l F ORIENT POINT HYDT. ORDER No. 200002284 - HYDT. PROJ. 025-10-00-03" 4 / EAST MARION HYDT. ORDER No. 200002283 - HYDT. PROJ. 025-10-00-014 CONTRACTOR COPY _ (� NOTE: COORDINATE SYS IEM; N.Y. STATE PCANE FEET, I ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D..99, / INSPECTOR COPY ' - (Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highwc, $70REKFEPER COPY me rDj�e Oakdale, NY 11769 WATER MAIN�STAI,j,ATlON STATE ROAD 2S "' Nptes: Rereren°e C—(9': / -AII restoration on N.Y_i. Aulhorizoli°ns Id. Sketch BY Dole:218/10 Town By MA8 0°fe. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y. A$ NOTED 2/8/10 t°wn:EAST MARiON seers, — —_ i,Nd YreA AY fosp. BY Scale:1"-4D' S/ro<f 9 0/ 29 7°wnship:$O(J TH(JTD Misc. br• _ ------.—__ _— Mnp No 231 2311 Se,,Order No, y of Sev;ces: be Dist:EAST Al FD be required _______-_— - !n Service Dote: Mein Order Nu:2000O2<"51 -- ._ ----- - -__— coin P,o/ece0J5-10-00-0049 Y 1 MARTIN D.FINNEGAN TOWN ATTORNEY SCOTT A. RUSSELL martin.finfl6gah@town.southold.ny.us of SU[/ry Supervisor JENNIFER ANDALORO �� �� Town Hall Annex, Route 25 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY � 1179 P.O. Boa 1179 jennifer.andaloro@town.southold.ny.ua Southold,New York 11971-0959 LGlTI M. Telephone(631) 765-1939 SE ASSISTANT TOWNN ATTORNEY TT 'YCQ� lori.hulM@town.southold.ny.us ' Facsimile(631) 765-6639 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 22, 2010 K8ozird nn Mt. Stephen M. Jones, Chief Executive Officer )uffblk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway hhotd Town Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 of Trustees RE: Board of Trustees/Administrative Permit for Directional Drilling Beneath Dam Pond Dear Mr. Jones: As I trust you are aware, the Town Board declined to adopt the proposed local law amending the Town's Water Supply Map pending the adoption of the Town's updated Comprehensive Plan and the submission by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) of proof of the demand for public water by the residents of Orient. As such, the 'own of Southold maintains that the installation of any portion of the water main is prohibited at this time in accordance with the long standing and well established agreement by the SCWA to defer to the Town's authorization of any water main extensions. With respect to other required approvals, although the Board of Trustees issued the SCWA an administrative permit in July 2009 for the Authority to undertake directional drllling under Dam Pond, it has come to the attention of the Board of Trustees through Public disclosures made in connection with the Town Board's consideration of an amendment to the Town's Water Map that additional approvals may be required from the Board of Trustees. It is clear that certain sections of the proposed water transmission main extension between Dam Pond and Browne Hills are within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees and, since the administrative permit was granted for the limited scope of work entailing the directional drilling under Dam Pond, any installation contemplated beyond the Dam Pond area will require a Wetlands Permit pursuant to Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. We are also advised that the permits previously issued by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and the Army Corps of Engineers are likewise limited to the directional drilling under Dam Pond. As I am sure you would agree, it is inappropriate and contrary to the mandates of the Environmental Conservation Law and related regulations to obtain permits for a proposed action in a piecemeal fashion. We would respectfully request that the SCWA Mr. Stephen M. Jones April 22, 2010 Page 2 review the existing permits, to the extent they are valid, and amend your application to the Board of Trustees so that the requisite review of the entire action can proceed. Please be advised that no further action should be taken with respect to the proposed water main extension until all required approvals are obtained and the Water Supply Map is formally amended by the adoption of a local law by the Town Board. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. V truly rs, rtin D. Fi egan To ey MDF/lk / cc: Timothy J. Hopkins, Esq. Members of the Town Board Members of the Board of Trustees Mr. Damon Rallis, Zoning Inspector Ms. Elizabeth A. Neville, Town clerk Fob r,rF -+ F � ikY SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Timothy J. Hopkins Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 General Counsel (631)563-0236 Fax(631)563-0370 June 25, 2010 U � U E Jill Doherty, President �!�,� 001j D Town of Southold 2 5 '� Board of Trustees Southhold Town Town Hall Annex Building Board of Trustees 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Dear Ms. Doherty: On April 22, 2010, the Southold Town Attorney sent a letter to the Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA) with respect to the above referenced project stating the following: With respect to required approvals, although the Board of Trustees issued to the SCWA an administrative permit in July 2009 for the Authority to undertake directional drilling under Dam Pond, it has come to the attention of the Board of Trustees through public disclosures made in connection with the Town Board's consideration of an amendment to the Town's Water Map that additional approvals may be required from the Board of Trustees. It is clear that certain sections of the proposed water transmission main extension between Dam Pond and Browns Hills are within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees and, since the administrative permit was granted for the limited scope of work entailing the directional drilling under Dam Pond, any installation contemplated beyond the Dam Pond area will require a Wetlands Permit pursuant to Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The letter went on to request that the SCWA amend its application to the Board of Trustees so that the requisite review of the entire action can proceed. A copy of the letter is enclosed for June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 3 The availability of public water will not, in and of itself, alter development patterns or result in increased density. Further, based upon the information provided regarding water quality in the shallow groundwater which is the sole drinking water source for the community it is expected that the proposed action and availability for connections by existing dwellings in the vicinity will result in significant public health, safety and welfare benefits. Also enclosed is a copy of the Plans for the Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion/Orient,New York dated June 17, 2009 (hereinafter"Plans"). These Plans indicate the entire route of the proposed water main. Please note that the directional drill under Dam Pond starts on page C-4 at distance 21+50 and ends on page C-5 at distance 26+00. This is the portion of the project for which the Board of Trustees has already issued an administrative permit. The Plans show two additional directional drills identified as Alternative Drill #1 and Alternative Drill #2. Instead of open cutting the roadbed near wetland areas, the SCWA will be installing additional portions of the water main utilizing the alternative directional drill method. This is the same installation method that was approved by the Board of Trustees for the section of the main going under Dam Pond. Alternative Drill #1 starts on page C-5 at distance 26+00, which is the location where the Dam Pond directional drill ended. Alternative Drill #1 ends on page C-6 at location 38+60. Alternative Drill #2 starts on page C-7 at location 46+70 and ends on page C-13 at location 85+50. Alternative Drill#1 and#2 will be exclusively within the roadbed and will not go under any water bodies. Also enclosed are other permits for the project for your reference. First, there is a letter from the US Army Corps of Engineers indicating that the project may be performed under the nationwide permit. The Army Corps of Engineers has indicated that it does not have jurisdiction over the portion of the project located in the road right of way. Second, there is a copy of the permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation("DEC") for the Dam Pond portion of the project. Third, there is a copy of the SCWA's DEC general permit for the project. The DEC general permit applies to the installation of water mains within existing roadways and within five feet of the roadway shoulder June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 2 your convenience. Since January 2001, the Town of Southold indicated that the no direct application for a wetlands permit need be made by the SCWA for water main projects that do not include directional drilling under a water body. The procedure was to simply have the highway department review the SCWA plans for road opening permits, and based upon those plans and meetings in the field and/or information provided by the SCWA line-up inspector, the highway department would advise the Board of Trustees and either accept or reject the SCWA proposal for erosion control (haybales/silt screens). A copy of a SCWA Memorandum regarding this procedure is enclosed. That procedure has been followed by the SCWA and the Town since that time. In any event, in accordance with Mr. Finnegan's request and in the spirit of cooperation and coordination and to facilitate the provision of badly needed public water supplies to residents of the Town of Southold along the route of the proposed water main and to improve drinking water quality in the Browns Hills subdivision, please consider this an amendment of the application to the Board of Trustees regarding the above referenced application. The SCWA also respectfully reserves its legal rights with respect to this application and the issue of jurisdiction over the project by the Board of Trustees. As you are probably aware, the SCWA and the Board of Trustees has already treated this project as a Type II action under SEQR because it involves the extension of utility distribution facilities to an existing subdivision as per the statewide SEQR Type H list. An Article 78 proceeding challenging this determination was dismissed affirming the determination that the project is a Type II action. You may not be aware of the fact that the Southold Town Board had an outside consultant prepare a SEQR long environmental assessment form for this project prior to the court decision. A copy of the same is enclosed for your reference. The Long EAF prepared for the Town Board includes an analysis of potential impacts related to the construction of the transmission main in an area of potentially regulated freshwater/tidal wetlands and flood plains at page 9. Part 2 of the Long EAF at page 12 of 21 indicates that the transmission main will not affect any water body designated as protected. Part 3 of the Long EAF concludes: The proposed action would not result in any new development. June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 4 near fresh and tidal wetlands. All of the proposed project falls within this definition with the exception of the Dam Pond directional drill portion of the project(which received a separate DEC permit as noted above). When the SCWA has a project falling under its DEC general permit, the SCWA sends a letter notifying the DEC. The notification includes project location maps and photographs of the site and adjacent wetlands. Enclosed is a copy of the maps and photographs that were sent to the DEC for this project in accordance with the SCWA's DEC general permit. Fourth, there is a copy of the New York State Department of Transportation Highway Work Permit for the project. Fifth,there is a copy of a letter from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation which indicates that the proposed project will have no adverse effect on historic or cultural resources eligible for listing or listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Sixth, enclosed for you convenience is a copy of the Administrative Permit that was issued for the Dam Pond portion of the project by the Board of Trustees on July 22, 2009. In addition to the above referenced documents,please find a Town of Southold Board of Trustees Application, including General Data, Coastal Erosion Application Data, Wetlands/Trustee Lands Application Data, Applicant/Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, and Erosion, Sedimentation& Storm- Water Run-Off Assessment Form. Should you need any additional information, please let me know. Very truly y urs, Timothy J. p ns Enclosures (three copies of each) Town of Southold Board of Trustees Application Office Use Only _Coastal Erosion Permit Application D (2 C _Wetland Permit Application _Administrative Permit Ilrr--LS„----�..�=-�� �-- _AmendmenUTransfer/Extension D _Received Application: _Received Fee:$ JUN 2 5 2010 _Completed Application _Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: southhold Town Type IType 1IUnlisted Board of Trustees _Coordination:(date sent) _LWRP Consistency Assessment Form CAC Referral Sent: _Date of Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: _Public Hearing Held: Resolution: NameofApplicant Suffolk County Water Authority Address 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 Phone Number:( ) 631-563-0236 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - n/a see enclosed maps Property Location: see enclosed maps (provide LILCO Pole#,distance to cross streets,and location) AGENT: n/a (If applicable) Address: Phone: Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): n/a, approximately 17,200 linear feet Area Zoning: n/a Previous use of property: state roadway with electric.and gas utilities Intended use of property: state roadway with electric, gas, and water utilities Covenants and Restrictions: Yes X No If"Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date see enclosed letter and permits No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): see enclosed letter, maps, EAF, permits, etc. Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: installation of water tranmission main Area of wetlands on lot: n/a square feet Percent coverage of lot: n/a % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet see enclosed maps and photos Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet see enclosed maps and photos Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? 517.40 cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: as per roadbed Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: 10 entry/receiving pits will be used for three directional drills; all excavations will be backfilled and restored to original condition; silt screens and hay bales will be used around entry/receiving pits and between station an as per enciosed p ans. -Approximately 820t feet of grass/dirt shoulder will be excavated using open trenching, which will be back- fiiied and restored as we". Statement of the effect, if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): No negative environments impacts are anticipated. There will be no impact on any wetland or tidal waters of the Town as a result of the project. Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: installation of water transmission main Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? 517.40(cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: 10 entry/receiving pits will be used for three directional drills; all excavations will be backfilled and restored to original condition; silt screens and hay bales will be used around entry/receiving pits and between station 38+ 60 and 46 + 70 as per enclosed plans. Approximately 820t feet of grass/dirt shoulder will be excavated using open trenching, which will be back— fIlled and restored as well. Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) Now negative impacts are anticipated. See enclosed EAF for full analysis. Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York Deputy CEO for Operations of the Herman J. Miller / BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S)OR REPRESENTATIVES(S),TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Sign lure SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS_*�_DAY OF 14ce 20 Io Notary Pu lic Timothy J. Hopkins Notary Publio,State of New York No.02HO6040236 Term Expires April 17, Qualified in Suffolk County APPLICANUAGENUREPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOURNAME: Suffolk County Water Authority (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee X Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest.`Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this _day of 200 M Signature Print Name Herman J. Miller Form TS 1 Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM 115 PitoprRTY LocAnom: aF sal ik THE FOLLOMMO ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SURMNSION OF A '01 to State Route 25 a FUN - gW—UM— alml —rw— GERM[ lEo MY A OESION PROFE M TM INTMITIS of NEW YORN- SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yee No a. What Is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? j Nil this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within n/a Generated by a Two(2)Inch Rainfall on Site? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (SA I aan (Ibis Item will Include all runoff created by site R b. What Is the Total Area of Land Gearing clearing ancifr construction activities as well as all — "or Ground Disarbance for the proposed n/a site bproveme rds and the permanent creation of construction activity? impervious surfaces.) (e.F.l Aawa) PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT'DESCREMON (palaaAderaYPea...waaa) 2 Does the Site Plan dl Survey Show Proposed ❑ Drainage Structures Indicating Size 8 Location?This R Item anal include all Proposed Grade Changes and Installation of water transmission Slopes conbv"Surface Water Flow. $ Doers the Site flan and/or Survey describe the erosion main in roadbed of State Route 25 and sediment control pradloss that will be used to X ❑ conbot sits erocicn end storm water dlSotargea. This — as per enclosed plans. Item must be maintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. 4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or Excavation where there Is a change to the Natural EAsting Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards — x of Material within any Patel' 5 Will this Application Require rand Disturbing Activities Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand R (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? — 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Sib? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction Gerand ow SWPPP Raataswents: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Wetland or SubmiWon of e NOW Is mqueed fort CanWuction adNNes Invel gnot Beach? 41drrbauan of ors(1)or nuns aces: ndudhg dlsturbarces of less tan one spa tat 7 WE there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes ate gat as lases common pan mat we uarmbly disturb one or man aaasaand: which Exceed FTheen(13)feet of Ver"Rise to kKkKIng Om*udinn aardYn Involving not dlibuerim ba New,on Im tlae(1)saewhea One Hundred(100')Of Fbdmrgel Dlsbnce? — X the GEC has determined m in d that a MEN Perm la da required he slam water aeryn. (SWPPP*Shoff a"ON Minimum segnhwnrarta afro SPOES General Permit 8 WE Drivemem Parting Artie or other Impervious for I tea Wear Discharges Sae Cane n"am naeWy-PmMt Na.GP-04e401.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct StOmFWeler Rln•ON ❑ )( 1.The SWPPP shall be pmm W poor to the wbrr )eta NOI.The NO)Nadi be Into andkw in the direction of a Town righMPAmyt oubmaled loins DOWUW potato Me aexrenoan d of=skuaticn oc*ky. 2.The SWPPP shag doealba theamNun arW sadnantomad Mcdon and whm 9 Will No Project Require the Placement of Maw,* reguInad,pod rwkncdcn same waternrrrgament podia and an be and aidla Removal of Vegetation and%or the Construction of any X caannmdsonirawpoturshsamwaw esdwgu wdmasan them Within the Tam Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder — carptatcewlhme team mid con 011 of the poem.In odd*M fie SWPPP sha1 Area?Manson tutu xorraa,sar awr.nmao,ewerAa,w) qually Msta. waW dnaaraes. which may rnnWnWM tea arpedddbaNNtltla NOTE NARY A aver"Quasar One rrmrgh Nine b ArrwredwM a dank tYA 3.AISWPPPsnataPaeate Wait<aaauctcnslam vAvWmnspmwg Mace In a Max and do camruars WeaNaraman,Nralwm 4ae0 VIA a l Add In des, carport shall be pwaad by a quWed Design Pmfsdonl Ummed In Now York agbNa Watr,eneding,bnkrryeaaasbn Commi RarhRaiukedhytherawner #al N nowwosehls in the pdnolpaa and pmall ms of Same Mar Management. Santana and Nm be SulenNad for Review Mar a Mauna of Any euallng Patna 0107E Aawe MM(,F)anaar Anerrrlaetl,Qae OFAq WOC.VWAPPe ) STA17E OF NEW YOM S COUNTY OF.. .UFFO..........L.K._............_........SS 17rat I,.He rman,_5,., Miller,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Pennit, ..........Miller (NNn+s a twOddrsl apdip Domntua) And that he/she is the ,Deputy CEO .for Operations ............. . IOAw.n Conaadon AperN,Copses(Nher.der) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have perforated the said Work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in Ihis application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me this; ................ � � d r NotayPublic .... ...................................4..0...... .............. . .....(.s...s...e..a....a ......... FORM - 06/10 Notary Public,State of New York No.02HO6040236 Term Expires April 17, Qualified in Suffolk County NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Suffolk County Water Authority SCTM# State Route 25 between East Marion and Browns Hills Road, Orient YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: install a water transmission main. 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: State Route 25 between East Marion and Browns Hills Road, Orient 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, and/or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME: Suffolk County Water Authority MAILINGADDRESS: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 PHONE#: 631-563-0236 Enc: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OFSUFFOLK , residing at being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of 20_, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application,directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names;that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold;that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this Day of 20 Notary Public D ECEoWE -- D =N2 :'",u Southhold Town Board of Trustees Hr )RANnUM TO: FILE FROM: Timothy J.Kilcommons,p.E. Supt. of Distribution Const DATE: January 12,2001 SUBJECT' Town of Southold Wetlands permit As per my conversation of 1112/O 1 With James Richter of the Town of Southold,no direct application for a wetlands permit need be made for pipeline projec��w�hich do not include directional drilling. The procedure will simply continue to be. i�frs'eRichter and Jacobs will review the plans SCWA submits for the road opening permits,and based upon those plans, and the meetings in the field and/or the information provided by our line-up ins r,they 11 advise the Southold'Trustees and either accept or reject or propo pecto sal for erosion control wi (haybales/silt screen). Z abed 00000-000-000 dLZ:fO OZOZ'LZ 2IdF! DEC EE wE Juv 25 2U'110 SoutD Town Boardcard of of T Trustees Town of Southold ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR'I'HE Local Law to Amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map Extending a Water Transmission Main to the Browns Hills Subdivision in Orient Prepared for: Town of Southold Town Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nelson,Pope&Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747 (631)427-5665 Date: April 20,2010 Summary This document is an Environmental Assessment of the proposed local law to amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to allow extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills subdivision in Orient. A copy of the Legal Notice regarding the local law is provided as Appendix A. Consistent with the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map, the transmission main will supply existing development that is in need of public water supply due to contamination of local aquifers and private water supply wells. The transmission main conveys water to the area in need and only supplies existing development. The Town Board of the Town of Southold retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) for environmental consulting services, specifically to evaluate the potential for environmental impacts related to the action and for completion of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) documentation. This document provides information regarding the potential environmental impacts of this action, to assist the Town Board in issuing a determination of significance in conformance SEQRA requirements. The Browns Hills Subdivision water supply, which draws from two local wells, has been identified by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services as representing a significant public health concern that requires the extension of public water to the area. The Suffolk County IA1T119R6 VOAIY!uC BNMW6Vf4.MMMO.fG9A� Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment Water Authority took over the Browns Hills community water system in 1998 and due to the high concentration of nitrates in groundwater, has installed reverse osmosis filter systems in 24 homes in the area. The filters are intended to provide safe drinking water at a single location in the home, for up to 5 gallons of consumable water per day. The proposed action, to provide safe drinking water via an extension of a transmission main to the existing water supply system, is proposed to eliminate the need for the filters, and provide safe clean drinking water to Browns Hills residents without restriction. In addition, existing developed properties adjacent to the transmission main, whose water quality may be impacted by agricultural activities, will have the option to connect to public water. Any new development in need of public water would require future amendments to the Water Supply Plan Map, separate review under SEQRA, and approval by the Town Board. Page 2 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Water Supply Management in the Town The Town of Southold has limited groundwater resources which are impacted in some areas by salt water intrusion, or by past and present land use activities which have compromised water quality. For example, groundwater has been contaminated where long term use of pesticides and fertilizers by agricultural uses has occurred, and where solid waste disposal facilities have leached pollutants. These practices have rendered groundwater unsafe for human consumption in certain areas of the Town. This is the case for some of the areas east of the Dam Pond Bridge, where the transmission main is proposed, especially the Browns Hills Subdivision which has a local water supply system served by wells that do not meet NYS Standards for drinking water. The Town of Southold adopted a Water Supply Management & Watershed Protection Strategy (WSM & WPS) in June of 2000. The Strategy was a component of a larger growth management initiative and its purpose was "To design, adopt and implement a strategy for the protection and management of the sole source aquifer of the Township of Southold. The strategy shall define the areas to be protected, areas suitable for development, areas designated for farm and agricultural protection and how the watershed will be managed in order to ensure the highest quality potable drinking water for private water supply wells and preserve rural character." As part of the implementation of the WSM & WPS, the Town adopted a Water Supply Plan Map to show areas of existing and proposed public water supply. This map was designed to identify the existing public water distribution network that comprised the public water supply system within the Town, and proposed future extensions of the public water distribution network that the Town would recognize for installation in coordination with the SCWA. In 2006, the Town of Southold formally amended the 2000 Water Map for two reasons; to reflect the physical changes made to the water supply network; and, to set policy for the future water supply network in response to changing water supply needs and increased growth trends within the Town. Between 2000 and 2006, SCWA installed some of the originally proposed extensions of service and, at the Town's request, installed new lines in response to immediate threats to public health, safety and welfare. The SCWA Findings Statement for its Five Year Plan (2003) set forth a policy that the extension of water from transmission mains' to undeveloped parcels would be withheld until the completion of a separate SEQRA analysis by the Town as lead agency. Undeveloped lands that are included within an Agricultural District (pursuant to New York Agriculture and Markets Law) would not be given water availability letters until a separate SEQRA analysis was performed by the Town, as lead agency, and the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets was notified of the petition for public water. Also, through Town policy, transmission mains may not be accessed by new development on currently vacant or subdividable land contiguous to the ' Transmission Mains are designed to carry large volumes of water from well sites and pumping stations to the smaller distribution lines which deliver water into smaller geographic areas. Page 3 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment mains unless the Town of Southold either previously authorized such a connection or votes in the future to allow such a connection. 1.2 Project Background The current proposal involves the construction of a 17,763 foot 12" water main to bring safe drinking water to the Browns Hills community. According to the Fact Sheet prepared by SCWA, Browns Hills is a small community of 24 homes, currently served by two very small wells. The water quality of these wells does not meet NY State standards for drinking water as the nitrate levels are over 10 parts per million. The SCWA has fitted homes in the Browns Hills Community with a single point of use reverse osmosis filter system (RO System) to treat a small volume of water. The RO System provides 5 gallons of water per day that meets the State standard for nitrate levels in drinking water. There is a special faucet installed on the kitchen sinks of these homes to access treated water. It is the only water available for drinking or cooking use in these homes. It is noted that the wells that serve this community are shallow, are located near an existing farm, and are very vulnerable to increased contamination. The system is isolated from other SCWA systems and a pump station failure would result in loss of water for the community. The proposed transmission main would connect the Browns Hills Community to SCWA's water supply system that currently serves the Town of Southold. The SCWA fact sheet notes that there are one hundred homes along the route of the proposed transmission main that would also have the option to connect to public water as a result of the project. Consistent with the Town's policy, any new development proposals will require future amendments to the Water Supply Plan Map, separate review under SEQRA, and approval by the Town Board to allow connection to the transmission main. 1.3 SEQRA Analysis The following provides an outline of the analysis completed for this review. • A Part I Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) has been prepared to provide background for this action;this is included in Appendix B. • A Part II EAF was prepared to assess the magnitude and importance of impacts (Appendix B). • An analysis of build out potential without public water availability and with public water. (Since the transmission main extends a distance of over 3 miles, the primary impact of concern involves growth potential in areas where the water main extension is proposed. However, since the project would make a future extension more feasible, the analysis considers the development potential under existing and proposed conditions for all parcels east of the Dam Pond Bridge (the westernmost point of the proposed extension). The following section describes the existing conditions and potential impacts of the proposed action. Page 4 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment 2_0 ExISTING CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS For the purpose of this analysis, the study area includes all parcels to the east of the Dam Pond Bridge in East Marion, to Orient Point. Although the extension of the transmission main would occur along Main Road between Dam Pond Bridge and Browns Hill Road, the potential for theoretical future expansion to Orient Point is also considered in order to fully analyze the potential for growth due to the availability of public water. As noted previously, the proposed project only involves extension of a transmission main to Browns Hill Road and only existing development along this route would have the option to connect. As a result, this analysis is a theoretical exercise of a worst case scenario which could only occur as a result of further action by SCWA and the Town Board through separate future actions which would also be subject to SEQRA. The analysis contained herein reviews the existing mechanisms of land use control to determine the potential build out which could occur both with and without available public water in order to determine growth potential as a result of the proposed action. 2.1 Suffolk County Sanitary Code The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulates residential construction under Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and has established Groundwater Management Zones which provide minimum lot sizes for residential development (and design flow restrictions for commercial development). The entire north fork of Long Island is within Groundwater Management Zone IV. For Groundwater Management Zone IV, the minimum lot size required for a single family residence under SCSC is 20,000 SF. The allowable lot size and density does not change with the availability of public water. 2.1 Zoning Town zoning is the appropriate baseline by which to consider build out potential and potential impacts due to providing available public water. The Town ultimately determines the land use pattern and build out potential through zoning. The zoning is part of the comprehensive plan of the Town and was analyzed and subject to a Generic Environmental Impact Statement as part of the Comprehensive Implementation Strategy (CIS) in 2003. The CIS included a build out analysis which included Orient Point and the areas east of the Dam Pond Bridge. Residential zoning districts are prevalent in the study area (see Figure 1). The majority of the area is zoned R-40 or greater (minimum lot size is at least one acre per home). Additional zoning districts in the study area include R-80 (2 acre minimum lot size), R-120 (three acre minimum), R-200 (five acre lots) and business districts (HB, B, MI and MII). Residential use is permitted at various densities in all zoning districts in the study area. The Town of Southold Zoning Districts for the area east of Dam Pond Bridge are at least as strict as the SCSC with respect to minimum lot size and therefore, the zoning would prohibit increased density over what is currently permitted regardless of the SCSC and/or availability of public Page 5 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment water. The following section outlines the zoning districts in the area and the potential build out under current conditions and build out with the potential for public water for the entire area. 2.2 Protected Land The study area contains an abundance of protected land, as is illustrated on Figure 22. The study area contains 1,160 tax parcels, two of which contain primarily surface water. The total area, not including surface water, is 3,140 acres of Which 1,470 acres are protected which represents a 46.8% of the entire land area (not including surface water). Out of the total 3,140 acres, approximately 1,297 acres (41.3%) are currently developed. If considered based open the number of parcels, 869 parcels of 1,158 parcels are developed (75°/%). Based upon the Town database, there are a total of 908 parcels (2,330 acres) that are either protected or developed without potential for subdivision. Table 1 provides a summary of the protected and developed parcels in the study area. TABLE 1 PROTECTED LANDS IN THE STUDY AREA *. Y . ..ot iYi. Study area parcels* 1,158 3,140 Protected parcels 90 1,470 Percent protected 7.8% 46.8% Developed includes agricultural) 869 1297 Developed properties without potential for subdivision and additional residential development 818 860 Percent developed with no potential for additional development 70.6% 27.4% Protected or developed parcels (with no potential for additional development) 908 2,330 Percentage developed or protected 78.4% 74.2% * Does not include 2 underwater land parcels The relevance of protected land from the perspective of this SEQRA analysis is related to the potential for development that is presently diminished, since 46.8% of the land area is protected. The combined total of protected and existing developed land (without potential for subdivision) accounts for 74.2% of the land area, indicating that there is limited opportunity for additional development. It is expected that the Town and County will continue the program of land 'Figure 2 shows all protected parcels in the study area,including the two parcels which are primarily underwater and therefore omitted from the calculations in this section. Including these parcels would increase the areas of protected land and thus,the percentage of protected open space in the study area. 'Simply adding developed parcels and open space parcels does not necessarily show the area that does not have potential for change,since 51 of the developed properties have the potential for subdivision under current zoning regulations. Page 6 of 10 a Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment acquisition and Purchase of Development Rights. Any further development of unprotected developable lands would be controlled by Town Zoning. An analysis of the build out potential (under current zoning and with public water available) is provided in Section 2.3. 2.3 Build-Out Analysis The following analyzes the potential for additional residential lots under the current zoning, which accounts for land that is already protected. During the completion of the Town of Southold Comprehensive Implementation Strategy, the Town completed a build out analysis, which estimated the number of additional residences possible under current zoning. The analysis considered property size, zoning district (minimum lot size) and subtracted environmentally sensitive lands -which would be protected under current regulations (wetlands, coastal areas). The Town has maintained the database to account for changes. Based upon current conditions and existing zoning, there are 52 parcels east of the Dam Pond Bridge which have the potential to be subdivided, for a total of 187 additional residential lots. Table 2 provides a summary of the parcels that could be subdivided in this area. TABLE 2 POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS UNDER CURRENT CONDITIONS Zoning Minimum Lot Size under Number of Sub- Potential District current zoning dividable Parcels Additional Lots HD 20,000 SF 1 1 MII 20,000 SF * 5 11 R-200 200,000 SF 3 6 R-40 40,000 SF 7 19 R-80 80,000 SF 36 150 Total - 52 187 'Residential unit with community water;without public water,40,000 SF lot is the minimum The minimum lot size required for subdivision based upon Town zoning exceeds the requirements under SCSC, with one exception (for lots zoned Marine Business II). For the remaining 51 parcels that have potential for subdivision, the availability of public water does not affect the potential build out since the Town Zoning is more restrictive. Thus, the proposal for extension of public transmission main will not impact development potential without changes in the zoning districts for these properties. The single exception is for five properties within the Marine Business II Zoning District, a district which also allows residential use. Under the current zoning, the minimum lot size for construction of a residence within the MII Zoning District is 40,000 SF and currently there is the potential for eleven additional lots. If public water were extended to these properties, the minimum lot size for residences would be reduced to 20,000 SF and the potential build out for Page 7 of 10 a Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment these parcels could be increased to 22 lots4. It is noted that the likelihood of extension to these MII zoned parcels is low, as Browns Hill Road is at least 2.3 miles from the closest M11 Zoned property east of Dam Pond Bridge. Nevertheless, the potential for up to eleven additional lots over the current build out of 187 lots represents only 5.8% increase over the current build out. Lots which have potential for subdivision are illustrated on Figure 3 with the MII Marine Business zoned parcels referenced herein circled. 2.4 Hamlet Study According to the Town of Southold Hamlet Study, the Orient Hamlet Center contains all or portions of 9 parcels, totaling 1.8 acres. Although the recommendations of the Orient Vision includes the establishment of a HALO zone which would potentially allow single family residences at a density of 1 dwelling/20,000 SF, the implementation of increased density in this area would require a Change of Zone, a discretionary approval of the Town Board. The availability of public water would not increase the likelihood or feasibility of increased residential development regardless of the recommendation for a HALO zone, since the SCSC already permits residential development on 20,000 SF lots. The Town zoning requirement for all lots in the recommended HALO zone area currently exceeds this minimum lot size and a change of zone would be required to establish 20,000 SF lots. It is noted that at least 2 of the 5 parcels have more than one zoning designation which would be more restrictive than the MIT Zoning provision that allows one residential lot/20,000 SF area and therefore this represents a worst case analysis with respect to build out with public water availability. Further,this analysis does not include site specific analysis as it relates to NYS DEC wetland constraints,which may further restrict lot size. Page 8 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment 3_0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Preparation of the Long EAT Part II identified potential impacts related to the construction of the transmission main in an area of potentially regulated freshwater/tidal wetlands and flood plains. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC) regulates activities in tidal wetlands and adjacent areas. The proposed action occurs within an existing roadbed, which is outside of the tidal wetlands jurisdictional area of the NYS DEC. However, since the transmission main will need to be installed under the Dam Pond Channel, a DEC Permit was required and has been issued. The NYS DEC permit for the project contains conditions for construction which SCWA will need to conform to in order to protect sensitive environmental resources related to Dam Pond. According to the SCWA Fact Sheet, the SCWA will use two installation techniques, horizontal directional drilling (HDD) and open cut. HDD is said to be one of the least obtrusive ways of installing mains, as it starts with drilling two holes on either end of the portion of buried main and a path is drilled underground without disturbing the waterway or land. HDD will be employed alongside the bridge on Main Road to route the main below the Dam Pond Channel (the main will be located more than 10' below the channel bottom). The area surrounding the holes will be surrounded with haybales for erosion control. Although the area of installation is within a flood zone, the construction of a water main, which is under ground, will not be impacted by flooding, nor will it impact flood potential. Page 9 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment 4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The analysis conducted by this office analyzed the proposed action, which involves the extension of a transmission main to the Browns Hills community on Browns Hill Road in Orient. The proposed action would allow for existing developed properties to connect to public water and the provision of clean safe drinking water in a community whose water supply is currently compromised. The proposed action would not result in any new development. The analysis conducted illustrates that the only potential increase in development is unlikely and not significant even if it were to occur in the future. The additional development that could occur is for residential development on MII Marine Business zoned parcels that currently could result in eleven new dwellings without public water. The availability of public water to these properties in Orient Point (which would require a substantial extension from Browns Hill Road-at least 2.3 miles) would allow for 20,000 SF lots as opposed to the current 40,000 SF lots required by the Town and build out would be increased to maximum of eleven additional lots. Any application for connection to the transmission main for new development would require a future amendment of the Town Water Supply Plan Map, which requires approval by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, a full SEQRA review and individual impacts analyzed on a site specific basis. The availability of public water will not, in and of itself, alter development patterns or result in increased density. Further, based upon the information provided regarding water quality in the shallow groundwater which is the sole drinking water source for the community it is expected that the proposed action and availability for connections by existing dwellings in the vicinity will result in significant public health, safety and welfare benefits. Page 10 of 10 Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment FIGURES e4tH IVE 6 WTN6 uC E�M9'MfM4 A� COW.ATNG Browns Hills Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment APPENDIX A Legal Notice LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, there has been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, on the 23rd day of February 2010, a Local Law entitled "A LOCAL LAW TO AMEND THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WATER SUPPLY PLAN MAP EXTENDING A WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN TO THE BROWNS HILLS SUBDIVISION IN ORIENT" and NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing on the aforesaid Local Law at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,New York, on the 6th day of April, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. at which time all interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard. The proposed local law entitled, "A LOCAL LAW TO AMEND THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WATER SUPPLY PLAN MAP EXTENDING A WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN TO THE BROWNS HILLS SUBDIVISION IN ORIENT" reads as follows: LOCAL LAW NO. 2010 A Local Law entitled, "A Local Law to Amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map Extending a Water Transmission Main to the Browns Hills Subdivision in Orient ". BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows: Section 1. Legislative Intent. This Local Law proposes to amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Historically, the Water Supply Plan Map reflects the physical changes in the water supply network since 2000. The Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services have represented to the Town that the groundwater quality of existing wells supplying the Browns Hills area are inadequate and pose a significant concern that requires the extension of public water to the area. The extension of the transmission main is intended to supply existing development only and is not intended to result in additional development pressure in the area. Section 2. Enactment. Based on the goals of the Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services to provide safe drinking water to the Browns Hills Subdivision, and upon our consideration of the recommendation of the Suffolk County Water Authority and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, the environmental consultant retained by the Town and the public comments taken at the public hearing, we hereby amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Section 3. The Southold Water Supply Plan Map as adopted by Resolution No. 31 on June 20, 2000 by the Town Board, and most recently amended by Resolution No. 2007-603, is hereby amended to reflect the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or part of this Local Law shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the judgment shall not affect the validity of this law as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 5. Effective Date. This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State as provided by law. Dated: February 23, 2010 BY ORDER OF THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Elizabeth Neville Town Clerk Browns lulls Subdivision Transmission Main Extension Environmental Assessment APPENDIX B Long EAF Parts I and II l4BT1 VO4 6 um76 uc 0w1RtlM'BRu.I4arvNlG.�GLiM 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑✓ Part 1 ✓❑Part 2 ❑✓ Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Transmission Main Extension for Browns Hills Subdivision Name of Action Town Board of the Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Scott Russell Town Supervisor Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) April 20,2010 website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Transmission Main Extension for Browns Hills Subdivision Location of Action(include Street Address, Municipality and County) Main Road from Dam Pond Bridge,east to Browns Hills Road,north to existing water main location. Name of Applicant/Sponsor Town of Southold Town Board Address 53095 Main Road City/PO Southold State NY Zip Code 11971 Business Telephone Name of Owner(if different) N/A Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: The Town Board is considering adoption of a Local Law which would amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Historically,the Water Supply Plan Map reflects the physical changes in the water supply network since 2000.The Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services have represented to the Town that the groundwater quality of existing wells supplying the Browns Hills area are inadequate and pose a significant concern that requires the extension of public water to the area.The extension of the transmission main is intended to supply existing development only and is not intended to result in additional development pressure in the area. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ✓❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑✓ Agriculture ❑✓ Other vacant land acres 2. Total acreage of project area: , . 3826 Area of town east of the Dam Pond Bridge in East Marion(including Orient&Orient Point) APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres (No changes in developed state from proposed action) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Carver-Plymouth-Riverhead Association&Haven-Riverhead Association a. Soil drainage: ❑✓ Well drained 100%of site ❑Moderately well drained_% of site. ❑Poorly drained _%of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). N/A 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes ❑ No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: N/A 1:10-10%_% ❑10- 15%_% ❑ 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantiall contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes ❑ No N/A 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ❑No N/A 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) Variable g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑� Yes ❑ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑D Yes ❑No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? 0Yes n No N/A According to: -- Identify each species: 12, Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ❑� Yes 11 No Describe: Coastal area,narrow area of land which is improved w/Main Road which has surface water on both sides 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? 11 Yes El No (proposed action to occur following roads) If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ElYes [:]No Views of agricultural uses,Orient Harbor,Long Island Sound 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Dam Pond,wetlands associated with Orient Harbor,Gardiner's Bay,Long Island Sound b. Size (in acres): N/A Page 4 of 21 Community water supply is isolated from the SCWA system. Purpose is to extend SCWA System to replace existing water 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes No `apply. a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? El Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? FEYes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ❑No N/A-main will follow existing roads. 19. Is the site located in or substantiall contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes all 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes No B. Project Description N/A 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: acres. N/A b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. N/A c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. N/A d. Length of project, In miles: +/-3.4 (if appropriate) (extension of transmission main) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. _% N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? N/A h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A;No additional homes will result from proposed action. One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 17,763 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards. N/A 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed BYes ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Road restoration(to occur daily) b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No N/A c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No N/A 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? 11 Yes M No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 13 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ❑ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete NSA 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ❑No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑� No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes SNo If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ❑No 16, Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes 0 No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ®Yes MNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes ❑� No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ®Yes ❑� No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Yes ElNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. N/A 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.Unknown 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑� Yes ® No If yes, explain: SCWA has been awarded$1.9 million in Federal Stimulus funding through the NYS Drinking Water Revolving Fund. Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date Water Supply Plan City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ® No Map Amendment City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department ❑Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No State Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No Federal Agencies - ❑Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? R-40,R-80,R-200,HD,HB,M 11 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Build out indicates under current zoning,an addition 187 homes could be built. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? (availability of public water) No changes in zoning proposed,however,availability of public water would decrease minimum lot size. Requirement for residences in the Marine Business Zone from 40,000 SF per residence,to 20,000 SF per residence. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? If public water were extended to Orient Point,several lots would have potential for additional residential lots,up to 11. However,this is a worst case analysis since public water would need to be extended at least 2.3 miles and some lots are constrained further with split zoning. 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adapted local land use plans? ❑� Yes ❑No Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy&Orient Hamlet Study. 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ''/4 mile radius of proposed action? Vacant land,residential,small business,marina&agricultural use. R-40,R-80,HD,HB,B zoning districts. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? �i Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? © Yes El No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? El Yes E No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ®Yes ® No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes El No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ®Yes No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Town Board of the Town of Southol Date April 20,2010 Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 -PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ❑. YES ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes []No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ® ® ❑ Yes ❑No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes []No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ® ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes []No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e., rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) ElNO ID YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ®Yes [:]No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ElNO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑� ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposal within an existing roadway adjacent to wetlands for+/-3,500'. 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? IDNO YES Examples Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ® ® ®Yes ❑No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water © ❑ ®Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ®No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? El NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. © ® ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No floodway. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? El NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? El NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Federal list,using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ® ❑ ❑Yes ®No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields,pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ® ® ❑Yes ❑No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ® ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land management systems(e.g., subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) ❑. NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ElNO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? El NO El YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? ❑NO El YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? E]NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ❑ ❑ []Yes [:]No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ElNO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the ❑ ❑ []Yes []No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ❑ ❑ []Yes []No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? . ❑NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ []Yes []No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? El NO ©YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hazardous substances(i.e. oil, pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes' ❑ ❑ []Yes []No in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous,highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No Action will provide safe drinking water for at least 24 homes whose water supply currently does not meet NYS drinking water standards. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? O NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ []Yes []No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ❑ ® []Yes []No services(e.g.schools, police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 20. Is there,or is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. NSA Instructions (If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance,consider: •The probability of the impact occurring •The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value •Whether the impact can or will be controlled •The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals •Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 ,w i f � ba t Legend Water Main Type — Existing ■xnu, Transmission Main (Proposed) Mil Zoned Parcels with potential for subdivison are circled in yellow Subdividable Parcels source. FSRI.:o1M.S.t,Wd Town ctS FIGURE 3 Browns Hills Transmission Main s�wr: Imcn=zaeue" EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION POTENTIAL SEQRA Analysis _.. .: R40 e. R40 - st R40� �� R 80 MIs R 7. q ?a - R-80 R40 w � It oj w f f{{ G R4,61 c • 16315677895 SUFFOLK COUNTY WATE 16:43:35 12-29-20N 23 EL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY D 11 ;,i� D�NEW YORK DISTRICT COM OF ENGINEERS "` .-.. . JACO!K JAWS FEDERAL BUR.ONIO NEW YORKORK,N.Y.1027e40m0 Southhold Town oar of Trustees Piny TO ATrewrouoo Regulatory Branch-Eastern Permits Section SUBJECT: Application Number NAM-2009-01325-ESP by the Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway Oakdale, N.Y. 11769 Gentlemen: On November 16, 2009, the New York District Corps of Engineers received a request for Department of the Army authorization to install, by directional drilling, approximately 420 linear feet of 12-inch diameter water main to approximately 12-feet below the existing level of the waterway substrate and Dam Pond Channel, a tributary to Noyack Bay, Shelter Island Sound at East Marion, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Based on the information submitted to this office, and accomplishment of notification in accordance with the applicable federal requirements, our review of the project indicates that an individual permit is not required. It appears that the activities within the jurisdiction of this office could be accomplished under Department of the Army Nationwide General Permit Number 12. The nationwide permits are prescribed as an Issuance of Nationwide Permits in the Federal Register dated March 12, 2007 (FR Vol. 72, No. 47) . The work may be performed without further authorization from this office provided the activity complies with the permit conditions listed in Section B, No. 12 Section C, any applicable New York District regional conditions, and any applicable regional conditions added by the State of New York, copies enclosed. Special Condition a 1) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permitter will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Snginsers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. Y 16315577895 SUFFOLK COUNTY WATE 16:43:48 12-29-2009 33 Please note that this nationwide permit (NWP) verification is based on a preliminary jurisdictional determination (JD) . A preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, prior to commencement of the authorized work you may request an approved JD, which may be appealed, by contacting the New York District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for further instruction. To assist you in this decision and address any questions you may have on the differences between preliminary and approved jurisdictional determinations, please review U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, which can be found at : http://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Documents/cecwo/rev/rcls/r 108 02 pdf This verification is valid for a period of two years from the date of this letter, unless the nationwide permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. This verification will remain valid for two years from the date of this letter if the activity complies with the terms of any subsequent modifications of the nationwide permit authorization. If the nationwide permits are suspended, revoked, or modified in such a way that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of a nationwide permit, and the proposed activity has commenced, or is under contract to commence, the permi.ttee shall have 12 months from the date of such action to complete the activity. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked March le, 2012. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a public notice when the NWPs are reissued. This authorization is conditional on the applicant's receipt of the required water quality certificate or waiver from the New York State D artmsat of Eaviroamaatal Coaaervatioa (NYSDEC) .No wor may be accosp s unti a requ re approva rom NrSDEC has been obtained. This authorization is conditional on the applicant's receipt of the required coastal zone MOM ament concurrence or waiver from the Now York State De artment of State (NYSDOS) . No work may be accomp shed Mat t e required approva rom NYSDOS has been obtained. Within 30 days of the completion of the activity authorized by this permit, and any mitigation required by this permit, you are to sign and submit the attached compliance certification form to this office. If any questions should arise concerning this matter, please contact Craig Spitz, of my staff, at (917) 790-8522 . Sincerely, State M. Jense Acting Chief, Eastern Permits Section , • .s At** Vw* State Department of Environmental Conservation DiV)sku►:of Environmental Permits SVMV 0 Stony Brook, 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3409 T61900ne (831) 444-0364 0 Faoe&oNe (031) 444-0380 AIAZWwrr a. oamw CV nmhffib~ September 25, 2009 Town C E W E of Southold � D N� 11971 Southhold Town -t RE: 1-4738-02843/00002 Board of Trustees Dear Permittee: In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures Act(Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621) we are enclosing your permit. Please carefully read all permit conditions and special conditions contained in the permit to ensure compliance during the term of the permit. If you are unable to comply with any conditions, please contact us at the above address. Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be Conspicuously and protected from the weather. Y posted at the project site Sincerely, eam Fii( I Carol A. Farkas CAF/ls Environmental Analyst Enclosure THEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Faeilfty'DEC ID 1-473"2W PERMIT ' Under the Environmental Conservation Law CL Permittee and Facility Information Permit Issued To: Facility. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DAM POND PO BOX 1179 ST RTE 25-W SIDE OF DAM PONDISCTM 1000-22-3-2.1 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 EAST MARION,NY 11939 I Facility Application Contact: Facility Permit Contact: SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY JAMES C MCMAHON PO BOX 38 SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL OAKDALE,NY 11769-0038 PO BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 (631)765-1892 Facility Location: in SOUTHOLD in SUFFOLK COUNTY Village: East Marion FacWty Principal Reference Point: NYTM-E: 724.1 NYTM-N: 4557 Latitude: 41008100.2" Longitude: 7201948.4" Project Location: ST RTE 25 - WEST SIDE OF DAM POND-WATERCOURSE-DAM POND CHANNEL Authorized Activity: Directional bore a 12"HDPE pipe transmission main under Dam Pond Channel and along Route 25. All work must be done in accordance with NYSDEC plan stamped approvod on 9/24/09 and prepared by 3CWA 6/l6/09, last revised 7/22/09. (CAF) Permit Authorizations rkW Wetlands-Under Article 25 PamitID 1-4738-02843/00002 New Permit Effective Date:9L24=09 Expiration Date:W23=19 NYSDEC Approval By acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict wmPffmce with the ECL,all applicable regulations,and all conditions included as part of this lermit 'etmit Administrator.SUSAN ACKERMAN,Deputy,Regional Permit Administrator kddress: NYSDEC REGION 1 HEADQUARTERS SUNY(®0 STONY BROOY450 CIRCLE RD STONYIBROO�NY 11790-3409 A � NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 17adaty DEC M 14738-02843 Distribution List JAMES C MCMAHON SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Marine Habitat Protection CAROL A FARKAS Permit Components NATURAL RESOURCE PERMrf CbmmoNS GENERAL CONDPPIONS,APPLY TO ALL AUTHORIZED PERMITS NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERwmE OBLIGATIONS NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS -Apply to the Following Permits: TIDAL WETLANDS I. State Not Liable for Damage The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations Aidertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and no ,lain or right to compensation shall accrue fi+om any such damage. 2. No Construction Debris in Wetbmd or Adjacent Area Any debris or excess material from instruction of this project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area(upland)and removed to m approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in wetlands and/or protected buffer areas. 3. No Disturbance to Vegebtod Tidal Wetlands There shall be ro disturbance to vegetated tidal afedands or protected buffer areas as a result of the permitted activities. 4. Storage of Equipment,Materials The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be :onfined within the project work area and/or upland areas greater then SO linear fed fiom the tidal ovedand boundary. S. Clean Fill Only All fill shall consist of clean sand,gravel,or soil(not asphalt,slag,flyash,broken concrete or demoli4on debris). 6. No Beach Excavation For Fill No excavation of the beach is authorized for the purpose of obtaining fill or stone materials. 7. Notice of Commencement At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project,the pemrittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification font certifying that they ire fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion )f project,the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 0 F&Mty DEC ID 14733-02943 S. Conformance With Plans All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or applicant's agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by Suffolk County Water Authority on 6/16/09,last revised 7/22109. 9. State May Order Removal or.Alteration of Work If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized,or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to,the five navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health,safety or welfare of the people of the State,or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State,the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work,obstructions,or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if,upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the structure,fill,excavation,or other t modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed,the owners, shall,without sxpense to the State,and to such extent and in such time and manner u the Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its fomrer condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shag x made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 10. Precautions Against Contamiandon of Waters All necessary precautions shall be taken to include contamination of any wodand or waterway by suspended solids,sediments, fuels,solvents, ubricants,epoxy coatings,Paints,concrete,leaehate or any other environmentally deleterious materials mociated with the project. 11. State May Require She Restoration If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the rroject hereby authorized has not been completed,the applicant shall,without expense to the State,and o such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former :ondition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or dteration. i GENERAL CONDITIONS -Apply to ALL Authorized Permits: 1. Facility Inspection by The Department The permitted site or facility,including relevant records,is ubjeet to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department ,f Environmental Conservation(the DepertmwA)to determine whether the Pennines is complying with us Permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71.0301 ad SAPA 401(3). 'he permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection the permit area when requested by the Department. i copy of this permit,including all referenced maps,drawings and special conditions,must be available rr inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to Produce°COPY of ue permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. a NEW PORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Faeinty DEC ID 14738-02843 2. Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orden and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Departmcn ,issuance of this permit does not modify,supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms,conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. 3. Applications For Permit Renewals,Modifications or Transfers The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Department for permit renewal,modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forums or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal,modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. Submission of applications for permit renewal,modification or transfer are to be submitted to: Regional Permit Administrator NYSDEC REGION 1 HEADQUARTERS SUNY @ STONY BROOV450.CIRCLE RD STONY BROOK,NY11790-3409 4. Submission of Renewal Application The permittee must submit a renewal application at least 30 *%before permit expiration for the following permit authorizations:Tidal Wetlands. S. Permit Modifications,Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Deportment *eserve s the right to modify,suspend or revoke this permit. The grounds for modification,suspension or -evocation include: a. materially false or inaccurate staterriants in the permit application or supporting papers; b. failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c. exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d. newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions,relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the wasting permit; e. noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions,orders of the commissioner,any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. S. Permit Transfer Permits are transferrable unless specifically prohibited by statute,regulation or nother permit condition. Applications for permit transfer should be submitted prior to actual transfer of ownership. V dEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ?sdttty DEC ID 14738-02843 1 NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS . Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification Me permittee,excepting state or federal agencies,expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the 3epattment of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York,its representatives,employees, and agents ("DEC")for all claims,Suits,actions,and damages,to the extent attributable to the .mmitteds ads or omissions in connection with the pesmittee's undertaking of activities in connection with,or operation and maintenance of,the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in :ompliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit This indemnideation does t iot extend to any claims,suits,actions,or damages to the extent attributable to DECs own negligent or intentional ads or omissions,or to any claims,suits,or actions naming the DEC and arising under Article 78 of the New York Civil Practice.Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision ,urder federal or state laws. Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors,employees,agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit,including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities,and such persons shall be std joct to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Regatred Permits The permitter is responsible for obtaining any other permits,approvals, lands,easements and rights-of- way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Iaterfere with Riparian Right j This permit does not convey to the pemuttee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian right of others in order to perform the.permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights,title,or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the pit t { 6 r New York State Department of Environmental Conservation _ Division of Environmental Permits, Region 1 SUNY 0 Stony Brook 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3409 - Phone: (631) 444-0365 •Fax: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.nv.aov Alexander B. Grannis Commissioner PERMIT RENEWAL March 5, 2010 Timothy Kilcommons HI C [ 0 ESuffolk County Water AuthorityD4060 Sunrise Highway Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 Re: General Permit # 1-4700-00010/000624 southhold Town Rnard of_TruMees _ Dear Mr. Kilcommons: The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) is in receipt of your request to renew or extend the above referenced permit and the request has been reviewed pursuant to the Uniform Procedures Regulations (6NYCRR Part 621). In order to continue to conduct authorized activities the permit is hereby extended to February 24, 2015 with the addition of the following special condition. 15. The permittee must submit an annual report to DEC by January 30"' of each calendar year listing all the projects conducted by SCWA pursuant to this general permit. The report must list the start date and completion date or current status of each project, and the report must list the location and wetland or waterbody for each project. This letter is a modification to the original permit and must be available at the permitted site whenever authorized work is in progress. All other terms and conditions remain as written in the original permit. Sincerely, /ar/kCarrar4ae� Permit Administrator cc: MHP BOH File NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DEC PERMIT NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE 1-4700-00010/00624 August 1, 2005 FACILITY/PROGRAM NUMBER(S) PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE(S) Under the Environmental August 1, 2010 Conservation Law TYPE OF PERMIT ■New ❑ Renewal ❑ Modification ❑Permit to Construct ❑Permit to Operate ■ Article 15,Title 5: Protection of Waters ❑ Article 17,Titles 7,8:SPDES ❑ Article 27,Title 9;6NYCRR 373: Hazardous Waste Management ❑ Article 15,Title 15:Water Supply ❑ Article 19:Air Pollution Control ❑ Article 34: Coastal Erasion ❑ Article 15,Title 15:Water Transport ❑ Article 23,Title 27: Mined Land Management Reclamation ❑ Article 15,Title 15: Long Island Wells ❑ Article 36: Floodplain Management ■ Article 24: Freshwater Wetlands ■ Article 15,Title 27:Wild,Scenic and ❑ Articles 1,3, 17, 19,27,37; Recreational Rivers ■ Article 25:Tidal Wetlands 6NYCRR 380:Radiation Control it-6NYCRR 608:Water Quality Certification ❑ Article 27,Title 7;6NYCRR 360: Solid Waste Management 1_ PERMIT ISSUED TO TELEPHONE NUMBER Suffolk County Water Authority (631) 563-0326 ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE 4050 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 C9(4TACT PERSON FOR PERMITTED WORK TELEPHONE NUMBER James Wilson, same address as above. NAMI55 AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILITY ExOting roadways throughout Suffolk County 'COLINTY TOWN WETLAND# NYTM COORDINATES Suffolk All Towns &Villages N/A DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY: INSTALLATION OF WATER MAINS WITHIN EXISTING ROAD- WAYS AND WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE ROADWAY SHOULDER. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED PLANS PREPARED BY JAMES WILSON DATED 9/15104. By acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations,the General Conditions specified(see page 3&4)and any Special Conditions(see page 2)included as part of this permit. DEPUTY PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR: ADDRESS Region 1 Headquarters Mark Carrara Bldg. #40, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE /' February 23, 2005 Page 1 of 4 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. This permit does not authorize the installation of water mains directly in regulated Tidal Wetlands or Freshwater Wetlands and it does not authorize installation of individual dwelling hook-ups near wetlands. This permit authorizes water main installation within existing roadways only. 2. The road surface may only be restored in-kind with the same pre-existing material type. Dirt roads are not authorized to be paved without further NYSDEC approval. 3: The permittee shall notify in writing the Regional Manager of the Bureau of Environmental Protection (BEP) for those projects within 100 feet of Freshwater Wetlands. The Regional Manager of the Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection(BMHP)must be notified for those projects within 300 feet of Tidal Wetlands. The notification must be received a minimum of 5 days prior to commencement. Notification shall include a project location map, photographs of the project site and adjacent wetland,and the expected duration of the project. 4. There shall be no disturbance to vegetated Tidal Wetlands or Freshwater Wetlands as a result of the permitted activity. 5c,.Any excess excavated materials shall be immediately and completely disposed of in a legal manner. @, Trenching is prohibited during rain events. 7.'--All disturbed areas where soil is temporarily exposed or stockpiled for longer than one day, shall be. covered with a tarp or contained by a continuous line of staked haybales placed on the downslope or wetland side. 8. Before trenching or excavation can begin within 100 feet of any regulated wetland, proper erosion control structures must be in place. A silt screen (maximum opening Sieve #20) and haybale barrier must be erected in order to effectively prevent excavated sediments from eroding into the wetlands or protected area. When the barrier is erected on sloped areas, haybales must be recessed into the ground 2 to 4 inches and the Silt screen recessed 6 inches to prevent underwash of sediment laden runoff. The barrier must be f properly maintained to ensure its proper function until all disturbed areas are repaved and/or revegetated. Sediments trapped by the bales shall be removed and reused or transported to an approved upland location before the bales themselves are removed. I , 9; All fill shall consist of "clean" gravel and soil (not asphalt, slag, flyash, broken concrete or demolition debris). DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 2 OF 5 1-4700-00010/000624 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION r SPECIAL CONDITIONS 10. Dewatering using a 30 gallon per minute capacity trench pump is authorized. Direct discharge to storm drains is prohibited. All groundwater discharges must be contained within a haybale and silt screen barrier to effectively contain all sediment laden discharge, and a sediment filter bag must be attached to the outfall pipe. When discharging to unpaved areas, a splash pad must be erected to prevent additional turbidity caused by scouring of the unpaved area. 12. All areas of soil disturbance resulting from water main installations shall be seeded with an appropriate perennial grass and mulched with straw immediately upon completion of the work at each site. Mulch shall be maintained until a suitable vegetative cover is established. If seeding is impracticable due to the time of year,a temporary mulch shall be applied and final seeding shall be performed as soon as weather conditions favor germination and growth. 13. During construction, concrete or leachate shall not escape or be discharged, nor shall washings from ftansit mix trucks,mixers,or other devices enter tidal wetlands,freshwater wetlands,and or protected buffer areas. 1.4: .AII equipment and machinery shall be stored and safely contained greater than 100 feet landward of the regulated wetland or water body at the end of each work day. This will serve to avoid the inadvertent leakage of deleterious substances into the wetlands. Fuel or other chemical storage tanks shall be contained and located at all times in an area greater than 100 feet from any wetland or water body. If the above requirement cannot be met by the permittee,then the storage areas must be designed to completely contain any and all potential leakage. Such a containment system must be approved by NYSDEC staff prior to equipment, machinery or tank storage within 100 feet of any regulated wetland. DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 3 OF 5 1-4700-00010/00624 NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification The permittee expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives, employees, and agents("DEC")for all claims,suits,actions, and damages, to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittee's undertaking of activities in connection with,or operation and maintenance of, the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This indemnification does not extend to any claims,suits, actions, or damages to the extent attributable to DEC's own negligent or intentional acts or omissions, or to any claims, s' its, or actions naming the DEC and arising under article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision under federal or state laws. Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their _responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easements and rights-of-way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. If fi ,nn,D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights Yhip permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others In order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights,title,or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. GENERAL CONDITIONS General Condition 1: Facility Inspection by the Department The permitted site or facility,including relevant records,is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department)to determine whether the permittee is complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301 and SAPA 401(3). The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by'the.Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. neral Condition 2: Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations 'e'iniess expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in sui:Tt order or determination. G+itr'eral Condition 3: Applications for Permit Renewals or Modifications The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Departmenffor renewal,modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal, modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. The permittee must submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES), Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMF), major Air Pollution Control (APC) and Solid Waste Management Facilities (SWMF); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. Submission of applications for permit renewal or modification are to be submitted to: NYSDEC Regional Permit Administrator, Region 1, SUNY Bldg#40, Stony Brook NY 11790-2356 General Condition 4: Permit Modifications, Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the right to modify,suspend or revoke this permit in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 621. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: a) materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; b) failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c) exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d) newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions,relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e) noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions, orders of the commissioner, any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 4 OF 5 1-4700-00010/00624 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (TITLE 5), 24, 25, 34 AND 6NYCRR PART 608 ( FRESHWATER WETLANDS ) 1. If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health,safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work,obstructions,or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State,and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the structure,fill, excavation,or other modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall,without expense to the State,and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 2. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 3. All necessary precautions shall betaken to preclude contamination of anywetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. 4: Any material dredged in the conduct of the work herein permitted shall be removed evenly,without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway. 5. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized. 6. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall,without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all oranyportion of the uncompleted structure orfill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 7. If granted under 6NYCRR Part 608,the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject projectwill not contravene effluent limitations orother limitations or standards under Sections 301,302.303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977(PL 95-217)provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. 10. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project, the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and, if required, a survey. 11, All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by James Wilson dated 9/15104 DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 5 OF 5 1-4700-00010/00624 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NOTIC 'E The Department of Environmental Cbnservation (DEC) has issued permits pursuan t ttotheEn vironmental Conservation for work being conducts at this site. For further Information regarding the nature and extent of work approved and an Departmental conditions on It, contact ' the Regional Permit Administrator listed below. Please refer to the permit number shown when contacting the DEC. Regional Permit Adpninistrator Permit Number ,"*700 00W/4O6y4 •V0 . Expiration Date '24 1 ✓� R0Aj' E Mp!Mvr`Mt>ult.. M M 1 -Wg.4e DOW NOTE: This notice Is NOT a permit a?FRtal+t3(5/u9) 3TF1SaF; EklfY' kFAiRTA1 (IR?FRTNATtIC>�1 . '�ftJW" iM-4'J9-d't474 Permit Fee ' ' ! ` d 074 Insu oe00 T otaaIYE ROW Checker M,O. No.: Deposit Rao'S.•for$ dl.4�10 Cheok or M.O„No.i £ Dated: 0*4Be *Permlttee, t of Work Performsd in the$late Right*of*4$ .. .. Biding Address: (complete If differpt,fropwabove) Return-of Deposit Ode Payable to:(opm(leteilf different from Permittee) , t , rq 1 Under the provisions of t4 H!gtiWay Lai of Vehicle.&;Traffic�Law, permission is hereby�B[antp t ka the tauwittea.to: To sacavate 6'resttre the AQY lop the plate NY 26 betvapil-NNe,iG92-S(726 to LnittallL 14#1 of 1� ALAaitsr DTP Ir other inciAsitai`York as PErattatkad 1r1 fiitallbe to,tits u47 44tiat 0--th-teeideatlogin ser -,SEE ATTACNE11 SPKIAL 40811101. All York Atli be doaa in aMrdaace eith aopre *41a� or ABBE. NOT shall be the responsibility of the"pptN ea°until eollplatioll'Qf ajl*rk, etc.` THE PERMITTEE.IS RESPONSIBLE FQR.T.EMPORARYTRAFFIC CONTROL IN IACCORD:ANCE V 1TH.THE NATIONALMANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE$AND THE NYS SUPPLEMENT ANYONE WORKING WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL WEAR HIGH-VISIBILITY APPAFjEL L4EETING THEE Af.NS1 107-2004 CLASS II,SjAND (2D,xS, P A.HARD HAT. County- SUFFOLK SOUTHOLD Municipality- 25 Route#- as set forth and represented in jhe attached;application at the.particular location or area,or over the routes as stated therein, if required;and pursuant to the conditions and regulations`general or special,and rnethod*,of performing work, if any;all of which are set forth in the application and form of this permit. Dated at: HAIIPPAU6E, M.Y. Commissioner of Trans on Date 5ign&O/1212118 EIWENE SMITN BY <' t- IMPORTANT THIS PERMIT,WITH APPLICATION AND DRAWING(OR COPIES,T4E***yHEp Ep IN HAyD§GF THE COt1TRACTOR BEFOREANY WORK BEGINS. THE HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT SHALL BEAVAILABLE AT THE SI)M PUNI16Rt#NS#StUCTIbN: BEFORE WORK IS STARTED AND UPON ITS COMPLETION,THI R( *, 5OU.9WMW4jOTIFY T RESIDENT ENGINEER, HEVIN-NATTMEI CBIIIFT "-w (631)727-1731 RjVEAHEAD;.MEII YQNK,4943 UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AUTHORIZED,THE FOLLOWING WILL BE Cf1MR1 ETBI,�9ANMBY THE PERMITTEE AND DELIVERED TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. Work authorized by this permit has been completed. Refund of deposit or retum/release of bond is requested. .DATE PERMITTEE . AUTHPRIZEDAGENT(fAny) Work authorized.by this permit has been satisfactorily completed and is accepted.Reverse aide of this form must be.completetl• ❑ Refund of Deposit is authorized ❑ Return of Bond is authorized O Mailing address ofrs fundilaaTaesir+vsrified. ❑ Amount charged against i?'ond<may be released If different,list new ad5iraisg 40YYe ❑ Retain Bond for future permits' ❑ Forteitof.Guarantee DapgsitiS 7ylhgriz.ed ❑ Other . . PATE RESIDENT ENGINEER The Regional Office will forward this fomJ to the Main Office with the appropriate box chgcked. ❑ Permit dosed ❑ Bond rstamed/rsleaSed ❑ Refund of Guarantee Deposit o7+ per7nit rs autllzed pp R Forfeit Guarantee ❑ Other VA PATE ;w•g+ R` t c v r n � r u The issuing authority reservasffttljItt�fet7�¢ntj;PrTe� pe�rrgt afitg Q(� either before or during the opepakorle The Permittee will cause an apprevoo"o 1'*ditlaeappl t tG Mtla eCf. �totre arl�prHy completed, in aceorda roe with ttenns of>tIe PrUtan3>p this permit will be napaued opr Upon completion of the wort municipality,orstatedepaetrtpeF "g �I ►spa ' of such work,or portion of suchwvlfto' `seYfQpth wltkita tertas and : m ' q PERM 42(5109)REVERSE - - INSPECTION REPORT For each Highway Work Permit issued, inspections will be performed.The following report must be cppleted for each site visit,indicating the date; inspector, and hours spent on inspection. If the total inspection time exceeds i hour,then a;FIN,12(PERMIT INSPECTION FOR DEPARTMENT SERVICES)is REQUIRED. INSPECTION REPORT HOURS WORKED BY DATE =" - ?ai HOURS Name Date Regular Overtime R O Name Date Regular Overtime R Name Date Regular Overtime R 0 R=Regular Time,0=Overtime TOTAL HOURS INSTRUCTIONS; 1. NAME: Name of inspector. 2. DATE: Day inspected. 3. R: The number of Regular hours spent on inspection for that day. 4. 0: The number of Overtime hours spent on inspection for that day. 5. HOURS: Add across rows for R and O. 6. TOTAL HOURS: Add the columns for R and O. CO MMENTSIOBS ERVATIONS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ABOVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. NAME TITLE PERM 41 Id (4166) REVERSE b. Boring,Jacking, and Tunneling Methods a) All the requirements of B.I. a. 1.)DESIGN a)through f)shall apply. b) Open excavations shall be protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transportation, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. CONSTRUCTION a) All the requirements of B. 1. a. 1.)CONSTRUCTION shall apply. C. SUBBASE, PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER REQUIREMENTS (including manholes) 1. Subbase a. The subbase course shall be a minimum of 12 inches thick unless otherwise approved.The material shall meet the requirements of current Department of Transportation subbase course item as specified by the Regional Sails Engineer. b. Under the permit,construction which adversely affects the subsurface drainage of the pavement structure shag be corrected by the addition of surface in subsurface Mains,as required. 2. Pavement and Shoulders a. Permanent The replaced pavement shag be similar to the existing pavement in composition and texture.The selection of the material type and compositon shall be subject to the approval of the Regional Director or his representative.The limit of pavement replacement shag he such that the replaced pavement is supported by thoroughly compacted subbase material and the pavement is restored to the proper grade, cross-slope and smoothness. When bituminous concrete mixtures are required for the pavement replacement,the layers shall consist of one or a combination of mixture types contained in Table 401 1, Composition of Bituminous Plant Mixtures in Section 401 of the New York State Department of Transportation's Specification,including addenda. The mixture shall be placed at the proper temperature, without segregation, and compacted thoroughly. When Portland cement concrete mixtures are required for pavement replacement,the mixtures shall consist of either Class C or Class F at contained in Table 501.3,Concrete Mixtures in Section 501 of the New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications,including addenda.Class F is a high early strength mixture and should he used when early opening to traffic is desired. The concrete mixtures shall be placed without segregation,then consolidated,finished to the proper elevation,and textured.Curing the concrete pavement shall be in accor. dance with one of the methods permitted in Section 502 pertaining to curing. Pavement shoulders, curbs, gutters and other incidental features shall be replaced in kind unless otherwise approved by the Regional Director or his representative. b. Temporary Pavement that is replaced temporarily may be paved with either a hot bituminous concrete mixture mentioned above or a cold bituminous patching mixture.When a cold patching mixture is used it shall consist of aggregate and bituminous material proportioned and mixed in a bituminous mixing plant or rotating paddle shaft pugmill.Regardless which patching mixture is used it shall he laid an a prepared foundation and thoroughly compacted.Since cold bituminous patching mixtures are subject to distortion by traffic,the temporary patch shall be maintained to provide a smooth surface until the pavement is permanently replaced. 3. Manholes Manhole frames and covers shall have sufficient structural adequacy to support the roadway traffic.The type of manhole frame and over shall be approved by the Regional Director or his representative.The manhole frame shall be set flush with the surface of the roadway unless otherwise permitted by the Regional Director or his representative. D. MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 1. Traffic is to be maintained at all times during the progress of this work and adequate signs,barricades and lights shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Sub-chapter H of the N.Y.S.Department of Transportation's Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.A maintenance and protection of traffic plan may he required.No lanes shag be closed without prior approval. 2. The applicant shall erect and maintain suitable barricades around all trenches while work is in progress fur the protection of the public,and they shag be suitably lighted by yellow lights at night. The work shall be carried on in such manner that not more than 100 feet of trench in earth remains open at and of day's work. 3. No pavement cuts are to be left unfilled over night,except in emergencies,and in such cases,adequate precautions must he exercised to protect traffic.Prior approval must be obtained to use steel plating. 4. No construction materials or equipment shall he left an the shoulders or pavement after working flours,nor shall any construction equipment or material be placed in any manner or location that will obstruct highway or railroad warning signs. 5. All open trench in the highway right-of-way shall be barricaded.There shag he conspicuously displayed bright red flags no less than 24"x 24"attached to such barricades and illuminated at night with flashing yellow lights.If in the judgment of the representative of the Commissioner of Transportation,flagman are necessary,they shall be employed by the permittee and on duty at all times during the progress of the work so as to direct traffic and maintain yellow flashing lights, etc. 6. Soft shoulder signs of adequate size,not less than 24"square,shall be erected and maintained on all hackfiD trenches within the shoulder area until the backfi0 is thoroughly settled. These signs shall he located at the beginning of each section of work at intersections and et a distance not greater than IOM feat apart. 7. During winter conditions highway shoulders shall be maintained tree of obstructions which would interfere with snow removal and ice control. B. The permittee shall keep the traveled way free of foreign objects such as rocks,timber and other Rams that may fall tram transporting vehicles.Spillage of material carried by or dropped from the under-carriage of any carrying vehicle resulting from the permittee's hauling operations along our across any public traveled way shall be removed immediate- ly and such traveled way, both within and outside of the work limits,shell be kept free of such spillage by the pormittee. E. COMPLETION OF WORK 1. All work is to be performed in a manner approved by the Resident Engineer of the State Department of Transportation. 2. All disturbed areas shall he returned to their original condition in a manner satisfactory to the Commissioner of Transportation or his representative 3. The permittee shall be required to restore shoulders and ditches and clean up the highway as his work progresses.All driveways shall he restored with material in kind and to their original conditions. 4. All surplus earth and rubbish shall he cleaned up and removed from the highway right-of-way upon completion of the work,and the highway left in a net and orderly condition. 5. As built plans showing final grade of new installation and existing underground facilities encountered.shall be provided to N.Y.S.O.O.T.if variation from approved design plans occurred during construction. F. NECESSITATED FUTURE WORK 1. The applicant agrees,that any present or future injury to or disturbance of the highway,its slopes or gutters,caused by placing mains and service pipe shall be repaired by the applicant at his own expense and in accordance with the requirements of the State Department of Transportation. 2. If necessity arises in the future because of the work on the State Highway system andfer its structures,requiring the removal,relocation or replacement of the installation authorized by the permit,said work shag he done as directed by the Commissioner or his representative,and all cost and expense so incurred shall he the obligation of the said permittee or his successor in interest. 11. TELEPHONE-TELEGRAPH INSTALLATIONS A. SETTING OF POLES 1. All poles shall be set outside the ditch lines so that the proper drainage of the highway will not be interfered with.In can It is impracticable to set poles co as not to interfere with the flow of water in the ditches,the shoulder,ditch and space around the pain shall he paved by the applicant to protect against wash. 2. There shall be no obstruction to private driveways,connecting highways or mads,paths in sidewalks. 3. In case it is found necessary to trim trees within the boundaries of the highway,the least possible mount shad be done,and in all cases the consent of the abutting property owner must be secured before the poles are set and trees trimmed. 4. Poles shall be of sufficient length to provide a clearance of not less than eighteen feat between the wire and the crown of the highway,under the worst condtitions of temperature and loading.They shag be set in line and properly plumbed.They shall be well guyed. No guying to tress,unless by special permission of owner.Special precautions shall be taken on curves and where lines cross from one side of highway to the other.Poles shall he straight,spend,and the fittings shall be of sufficient strength to can wires under the worst condition of loading lice, wind,etc). 5. Where telegraph and telephone wires cross high tension power lines,electric light or trolley wires, special precaution shall be taken to maintain proper clearance under the worst condition of temperature and loading. B. RESETTING POLES 1. If necessity arises in future,because of work on the highway,to relocate,replace or re-sat poles,cables or conduits,said work shall be done at the expense of the applicant. III. SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. In addition to the aforementioned conditions,if it is found necessary by this Department to add tow otherwise modify the same,it is to he understood each changes shall form a part of the permit and be complied with immediately upon notice. IV. ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND SKETCHES-Sae Attached Sheet. PERM 41-id(41861 METHOD OF PERFORMING WORN WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY I. GENERAL CONDITIONS These conditions and regulations apply to Highway Work Permits authorizing work within the State highway right-of-way for water mains,gas mains,sewer lines and miscellaneous structures. General conditions apply to telephone and telegraph installations as well as specific conditions on the setting and resetting of poles. Than wnditans, and any special conditions which are added to this farm, are enforceable by the Department of Transportation. A. TIME 1. Work under the permit shall he commenced within thirty(30)days from the date of permit issuance unless a later starting date is approved by the Regional Traffic Engineer. B. REQUIREMENTS All the currant requirements of the fallowing shall apply: Occupational Safety and Health Administration,Federal Department of labor,Safely and Health Standards(29 CFR 1 9 2 611 91 0); Part 131,Title 17, New York Code of Rules and Regulations, Accommodation of Utilities Within State Right-0f-Way;Now York State Department of Labor, Industrial Cade Rule 23,Protection of Persons Employed in Construction and Demolition Work;Industrial Cade Rule 53,Construction,Excavation and Demolition Operations At Or Near Underground Facilities. Temporary sail erosion and water pollution controls shall he used as required.The final decision on the method of underground installation will be made by the Regional Director or his representative. 1. Work Within Pavement and Shoulder Areas a. Installations that crass the pavement and shoulder area.Wherever practical,all underground installations shall be pined beneath the pavement and shoulder area without disturbance to these paved surfaces. 1) Boring, Jacking,and Tunneling Methods DESIGN a) The location of all excavations ljacking pits,etc.)shall be shown in plan and profile. b) The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall be determined by adequate subsurface exploration. ci The location of all other existing utilities shall be shown. d) The construction equipment and procedures to be used shall be described in the pawl application. e) The design of all excavations, including ground and surface water control where necessary,shall be made available for review by the Department. fl The underground installation shall be described in detail, i.e. site,length,depth, material,provisions for grouting, etc. g) Pipes shag generally be enclosed in slaves or larger pipes.Small diameter services(2 inch I.D.or smelled may be Placed without sleaving at the discmtion of N.Y.S.D.O.T. h) The limits of an open excavation shag not be closer than 10 fat to the edge of the pavement glen approved by the Department.Open excavations shall be protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accxrdace with the New York State Department of Transporta tion, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. CONSTRUCTION a) Grouting operations may be required if surface settlement,loss of soil or voids around the pipe develop.When grout is required,it shall consist of 1 part cement to 2 parts sand,by volume,and sufficient water to produce a consistency suitable for placing the grout. but Backfill of open excavations shall be as required under 2.) if Open Excavation Method. 2) Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) The location of all pavement crossing by the open excavation method shall be shown in plan and profile. b) The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall be determined by adequate subsurface exploration. d The location of all other existing utilities shall be shown. d) The design of all excavations,including ground and surface water central whore necessary, shall be made avaiable for review by the Department. e) When requested, the construction equipment and procedures lobe used shall be described in the permit application. f) Pipe installations shall be done according to the requirements of the appropriate New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Sheets.The required granular material shall meet the material requirements for Select Granular Fill in the turret New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Specifications including addenda. Exceptions will only he allowed if prior approval is granted by the Regional Soils Engineer. III Pavement shall be saw cut at lamination points of pavement replacement. CONSTRUCTION a) Pavement and shoulder removal shall he done in a manner that provides for proper restoration of the replacement section.Straight,vertical cuts of the pavement will be required.Pavement surfaces that became undermined shag be cat back and removed.Alternative repair methods may be used if prior approval is granted. b) The backfill material shall be placed and compacted according to the requirements far backfilling stracturo,ceNe ts,pipes,conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200,Earthwork, New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications,including addenda. c) Generally,cuts shall be filled at the end of each working day.With prior approval,steel over plates may be used. Recessing of these plates may be required. d) Temporary pavements and shoulders shall be placed as son as a crossover installation is completed. b. Installations that are longitudinal to the pavement. 11 Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) The location of all open excavations shall be shown in plan and profile. h) The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall be datermined by adequate subsurface exploration. c) The design of all excavations,including ground and surface water control where acesaary,shag be made available for review by the Department. all The location of all Giber existing utilities shall be shown. e) Pipe installations shall bedone according to the requirements of the appropriate New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Sheets.The required granular material shag mat the material requirements for Seect Granular Fill in the current Now York State Department of Transportation's Standard Specifications, including addenda. Exceptions will only be allowed if prior approval is granted by the Regional Soils Engineer. CONSTRUCTION al Pavement and shoulder removal shall be dame in a manner that provides for proper restoration of the replacement action.Straight,vertical cuts of the pavement will be required.Pavement surfaces that become undermined shag be cutback and removed.Alternative repair methods may be unit it prior approval is grated. b) The backfill material shall be placed and compacted according to the requirements for backfiWng structures,culverts;pipes,conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200,Earthwork,Navy York State Department of Transportation's Specifications,including addenda. cl Generally,cuts shall be filled at the and of each working day.With prior approval,sled cover plates may be used.Becoming of these plain may be required. all Permanent or mosperary pavement shall be pined.im ediatPly-usectims.af_the.totol,kwakatioo.am.complated to subbase eloatia.Gravel surfaces in shoulder areas may be used if prior approval is granted. 2) Baring,Jacking, and Tunneling Methods DESIGN a) All the requirements of 8.1. a. 1.)DESIGN a)through g)shall apply. CONSTRUCTION a) All the requirements of 8.1 a. 1.) CONSTRUCTION a)and b)shag apply. b) Open excavations shall be protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transportation,Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. c) The requirements of B.I. b. 1.) CONSTRUCTION dl shall apply. 2. Work Outside the Pavement and Shoulder Areas a. Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) All the requirements of B.I.It. 1.)DESIGN shag apply. b) Open excavations shelf be protected with the roquried controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transportation,Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. T CONSTRUCTION a) The backfill material shall be placed and compacted according to the requirements for backfil ing structures,culverts,pipes,conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200,Earthwork, New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications, including addenda. PERM.Sam(21M STATE OF NEW YORK CEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PREPARE 3 COPIES HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT APPLICATION FOR UIRM WORK Apdwdw dhw*w"Aw RAlphrp wolbpwRdb FwAeIMppkeddi,nn ad*mcg$w=WAppimwbpw: Nww SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY NM Add" 4000 SUNRISE HI0HWAY Amnw cki OAKDALE ft p NV zo -- CV4 8m _ZIP CIwSAAAARRNCedp Pm(wA ldwdpawM Na FWwd IA N0.w Sedw 3wudy N0. 114W02562 ApwwTdq*w I 631563-0753 CR Pw b.diwlwpwlq. TIMMUCOMMONS mg mwwA Pwww No. (�0 WOom m~ RKFUMOFOEPOSRMOID TOt www+Aloaar.owlworwwlewrlw RIIMI IP0paTRw�wsA Nwu Nww Add Ad*= mw Cpl.. SIAM_xq Cq BY_ig 1. Fipnmld aowdw bAYgpwlwlwd 11 oww Nym"dydN W$ a. Altldpn ftvftndw R,.. ap Y M_.bmP*Vft OPwsNmWdwdWblb. a pmwdwlwbwlybwwwwbomwwdbyp,,VW RPK/d-0801g013g w1,O4/01I2010., 'p,_ 4. Ap9M0Aw"bodwW§wdddwdYp9dbVb" �p�.p CNICKTMOFOPSIMTDIp'- wr„ .�' - NM o M^ TDAb RIYIbIbg MwR Rrr• Mw ' Ift TwY1 pA. 1. ^OIMW„wIYYn ... L-I wwA,A•i4bmwYYWYg t _>o saSR :❑ ,,pRw+.w.wrw a a. n Mrs p %�pw Is iRr+YwMrw.rwdw l0 r �Igrwrwrw m L Rwlddg dmwAwdwipA ww -- ' �,IT-�-Ip���A�w'Pw Seapw 21_I'�w� algw�'"Rw On! .0c=� U�/IwgdYY Pwwliwgiw�Ylwwwd4 w PHwdIwOPrwlr=Mw asap apMMwM�wwwwl llydallrwodi. � wwwWY 'bwp~ilw�dt� a.pllpMdwdr>wr.w. ffi dppotewwrwrrw.r µt p.pArdd�.la.wml., - pp a[]IYbwbPDAT.wpwYaC"- _ we ap�wwwdww.«Iwe..Rv '. mnwelen.. dp ce..i.Mw..w.alro.d iP LpAWrfipllwwwwrrwrlmrwww IF _ ApMYSYww- � PROPOSED WORK(BRIEF DESCRIPTION) INSTALLATION OF APPROX.2055'OF 12"D.I.P.NBLW/S/0 MAIN ROAD(S.R.25).E/F TRUMAN'S PATH TO PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL DRILL(AT DAM POND CHANNEL) 43W OF HOPE BY DIRECTIONAL DRE L FROM THE WEST SIDE OF BRIDGE TO EAST SIDE OF BRIDGE(AT DAM POND CHANNEL) 14661' 12"DIP ON THE KW MAIN ROAD(SIL 25)FROM EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL DRILL TO BROWNS HELL ROAD RESTORATION: TOTAL IN STATE R.O.W.:+/- 17146'SOME PAVEMENT WILL BE DISTURBED MAIN ROAD (S.R.25) ALL WORK WILL BE COMPLETED IN THE GRASS OR t,eO2U�SM ARz EA.S,OM$PAVEMENT AND GRASS WILL BE DISTURBED. •-/D ApPMwI pAwIM— .._.. . , 7p_r.,SYRwHpNfnpY1M ,.,— ••.-•.. RiIIMwwY Np.�.. Apmrtl alt'.�_.4Ri WTIMbSMF1Mr,'` . , <...:RppYnw: PERWFOM&MCONTWJM fUPONLOMFWQ WANE BONSAI . ' PERM 36(07i07) ATTACHMENT TO IDGHWAY WORK PERMfr d any tine during normal business hams or while work is actually being performed.Upon acceptance ofthe work by the Depm4reol, all teemda shall become the pmpertp ofthe Department Out Permiummay make or retain copies ofauch renal a 8wirnwnnexpense. The purposeofthee requirements is todocunmmt compliance by the Pannidee(and an contractors or sub-connatunempITMbyda Prnnittcc)with the quality,and workmanship requirrnumbi shown in the FMana and required by tho Standard Spccificaims. C.Obbainingallaens q materiel samples and conducting all noccsserr materieltab in accordance with the Ikymruuprn's Materials methods. If the Depalmool detetmmcY"Fluid iospeenoes for asphalt concrete and purilend naneol camacte will be required,the Pormttco shall"make arrangements with a reputable testing lahoranmry,(which shall be arpmvcd by One Iepabncia)to perknm such inspeclia¢s according to the Department's Stadar& The PenoiOee will be responsible for all costs associated with obtaining and testing ofampla. D. Conflating m inventory of ell misting bighway fauna inhaling,bd our limitedto,sigm,signets,slntclur es,cgonpmcut,cm in eoordmatian with the DepenmM's Engineer and the Permitee. E. Preparation of all drawtmgs,sketches,and plains necessary for changes to mast actual geld conditions. F. Providing three sets of Record(As•Buik)Plans upon completion ofthe want G. Reviewing and inspecting cenpiiaee with all aspects ofthe Maintenance dr Pmtaskm of I raOic provisions ofthe Naatthe Permit NYCRR Title 17.Volu ne B(ska.NYSMUTCD)and NYSDOT Standard Specificatimu and notifying the Depamentof say van- compliance dames. H.'Ihe Consuhem must notify the IkTartmaa,Pormillco end Contractor of a circumstance or condition of Onc want observed by and known to the Consultant per repined bammg to be a violatiwofa Finland.State a'local law.oahaaocaorregulation-The Cwadienl shag infmmtho Department ofM violations in the performrmooffho work nn this permit which ern not immcdiahly corrected Inds mend the Caowltanl mrogmzzs a Cadraiors oversight or a CmtraYur's di regard of projet safety mpmamenls which poses an hmmcdiato risk ofscriarpersonal injury andlmproperty demege,theComaboad shall have thnrWoily to notify thin Coa4arsa10aop work i®s"*;uamrg a stop-work order,and than lee Convidt tshag promptly nobly the Dapaimmt and the pP'ygi�m.�r.lhe ofsuch stop a-work order.Nobfitieat aaper cautious,of a stop-work order by the Camultaut dell am Rowe tla Caundicts r from sole _ respmtdlritily for job sib ssf*and compliance with ad applicable Federal,Stale or local laws,ordinances ad reguladuc s. 'TheDepartoant rasava the right to inspect the work for compliance with Federal,Staeolocal tows,ordinaocaandregaladom,buts undo no obligation mperfam such inspection,and assume mrespwability far lad ofa y compliance oudopaKdPoe Contractor.IF the Depamamt dderomea that there are serious or pereiekm vblsdom of applicable Federal.State or Wall tows,ordinances sod regdatims in rke weak of this Permit the leparmem may isaa a stop-wok order and all Pmmit weak will cause®madilely.In addition,the Permit may he revoked ifthe as"Instant eon nor resolved to the Ikporhnenrs sads&ct m. Iho Cmmlrant is rapmsibic for mmihting the(minmor's efforts to maintain ftM and protect lhepublic firm damarsoperson or properly in anxadmoe with pins and spaafwsuw,withn the limes u(and far am duration of the per®1 weds S. The Permilke shag rermbmae the State for all remittable Passing engineering review coats,and fan any Dganment mmpldad inapcctions which may be necausrydw to maglligtince m the patarthe Penntoco,lea CmluaWn,"do Consuhrt. Thaiorsandall inclunla.huh oat ha 1®iled to salaiea ad fimge benefr4 fa tha Dcpa0aal's Emglaenrs ad Cor�laaal Wspetors,wvduoata,elc ABwoak perforated by thoPermi0oe shag be ono aim the Sam.McabwiaonedbytheDcparmomt,moDepatmeotwMbMdw Permdbit,ma eddy,and do Permitter agaeas to pay all ash bills within 30 calendar days of she billing date.Faihoe to pay stark bills promptly shall be deemed a break of the Permit 9. Prior to the intended onuomanamee ofwarit the Pennines shall develop a srhebde from the contracma'work programs fin the accomphilinu d of all wok atbirae l by the Pentad and than subsist this schedule to the CanwBnt and the Department for iutonoalimd purposes The Pennines shall promptly notify the Ceuanitont and the Depethmsad of any changes to be echednle. 10. The PermiUm shall designee in wtitiog to the DepaOment the Conatse 's m-site peso who will be respomnbis foe an construction activities coveredby this Permit,adshall immedhaselynohythe Caa ftsMmWtheIkperbaminwrifmgifthemiscry changeoftheperonsodesiguated.The Pamawshsldalsodeagneft m rmoapersomsaemergea7aabcbad"edadiahn emergency tclgsMaa list Ihis ltaslail bo kotcarrcmbythe Pernaitmc and shall be providodto the Canadnnt.India DePethe. rod to local public safely,ageaicw. 11.Prim to the commcaxmenl of work the Permiton dull orange a prewndnwlan treating with Depositional"the Comdlant,the Pcrmiano.aM Oda Pcrmitce'a poalblclrea.Thc pmpnw nfthis mceting is tomsme that deco is o ckwu derRtwwht ,apohallymde put ofthe Contnctoa and Consultant ofthe requirements nopoed by the tams and coditims of the P ' The Permiuee dell ratify the Regional Permit Engineer a mt.t.,�,.n afhn days pier to the meeting him Consultant Audariad Sigoarre• Permitter Signaae �d1�i /ier.7 dr Tide �q D Tide T C)A-SHIAJ 4SS ! PC Wit- 51 G✓A Er �, li Consulting firm corpoabon •Consultant wthuticel symatmeinsist be by person who into legally ccr®it the L ar eking firm to(his requirements ufthisagreamesn. STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11786 MAJOR CONeTRUCT=RVSPZCEW FQ 'AGAEEJMVF WITH PER_M1 TI'F FOR R)r PgRuyff Permit Na. Date Issued Permlttee'aNams: suFFo�K Cau��'� L✓6lf'C� Address: 4000 &mris-e Town: Oakddtiv State zip code: . 11769 State HtghwayNumber. 25 Location of Work 6d-M.11i0r,.1d0 yT Permit work has been assigned to our Nassau Suffolk Construction Group Contact Number . All work to be coor&nated with the State Engineer- in-Charge assigned to your project As part of New York State Requiremenix concerningPsrmit butpecdan of n 4ar projects being dons within the Sects Right-of-Way, requires that the permbWe secure the scavkea ofo reputabk consultant or engineering firm (approval required by New York State Department of Transportation Construction Group)to perform the impectim ofalt worA permitted by the Department of TlranTortadom M consultant or enoweringJlrm doing the inspection will be responsible to the New York StateDepartment of 1 wuporiation Engineer-in-Charge, that has been assigned to oversee the permit work The permittee will be responsible for all phases of work even though subcontractors are secured to perform certain phases of the permitted work Changes to approved plans must be submitted to the Permit Department for approval prior to the start of arty work All work is to be done in accordance with the New York State Specifications or as indicated by the Engineer-in-Charge. The permittee will be responsible for the Maintenance and Protection of Dafflc for the duration of the permitted work HWP CASE 09-228P NY 25, ORIENT SCWA PROPOSED MAIN INSTALLATION PERMIT AMENDMENT All NYSDOT Standard Specifications shall apply and the provisions of Section 209 Soil Erosion & Sediment Control and Section 107-12 Water Quality Protection are emphasized. If a situation comes to the Engineer's attention the Erosion & Sediment Control (ESC) plans included in the contract documents may be modified, by the Engineer, to correct unsatisfactory procedures and operations, including locations of ESC measures. ESC shall be installed prior to the beginning of construction and excavation. Silt fence shall be installed so that each section shall overlap by one panel length and/or two post ends shall be wrapped together for continuous support. All ESC controls shall be inspected by the contractor every 7 days and after each rainfall of 1/2 inch or more within a 12 hour period, or daily during prolonged rainfall to determine if the measures are functioning as intended. Within 3 calendar days from completion of each inspection, the contractor shall: * Repair or rebuild the control measure to function as originally intended. *Remove sediment deposition which reaches one half the height of the control measure. Site disturbance shall be stabilized as construction progresses using permanent or temporary stabilization measures. All temporary stabilization shall be replaced by permanent stabilization prior to project completion. Under no condition shall earth material exposed by excavation or other work be left without application of temporary or permanent erosion controls for a period of greater than 7 calendar days. If the Engineer determines that potential for erosion or sediment transport exists the contractor may be ordered to install temporary erosion controls earlier. If work is suspended, i.e. seasonally, all disturbed areas shall be stabilized and ERC measures shall be inspected monthly and after rain and snow melt events. Permanent stabilization shall require the application of topsoil and seeding as indicated in the contract documents. Full stabilization shall be achieved when uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of no less than 80% has been established on all unpaved areas. Temporary stabilization shall require the application of mulch, seed & mulch, or Class I Short Term rolled erosion control product (RECP). Mulch may be straw bales and shall be spread at the rate of 2-3 bales per 1000 square feet. RECP shall be installed outside of the growing seasons, AOBE. All applications shall be as per NYSDOT Standards. Page 1 of 2 Temporary seeding shall be: Annual Ryegrass spread at the rate of 30 lb/acre or 11.5 oz/1000 square feet OR Winter Ryegrass spread at the rate of 100 lb/acre or 36 oz/1000 square feet to uniformly cover the ground. Either of the two following seed mixes are acceptable for temporary seeding. *Annual Ryegrass —Lolium multiflorum, Commercial improved varieties *Winter Rye `Aroostook' —Lolium sp. `Aroostook', Commercial improved varieties Note: Temporary seeding is restricted to the following seasons: Annual Ryegrass—March 1 to September 30 `Aroostook' Winter Rye Grass—March 1 to April 1 or September I to November 30 " Page 2 of 2 Special Provisions for HWP#10-09-0 q�-q • All permitted activity must be coordinated with Resident Permit Engineer. • Under the Clean Water Act a Storm Water Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit is required for storm water management for any project that exceeds 0.4045 Ha (1 acre) of soil disturbance. SPDES documentation for site / right-of-way disturbances of one (1) acre or more is required prior to performing work in the State Highway ROW. The required documentation is the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Notice of Intent and the NYSDEC acknowledgement letter to use SPDES General Permit GP-0-08-001 for this project. • SCWA shall make the necessary arrangements to obtain the following permits prior to any work: • ECL Article 24 permit • ECL Article 25 permit • SECTION 404 Nationwide permit (NWP#3) • Section 401 Water Quality certification • EL Article 42 Coastal Consistency review • ALL work is subject to local, regional and national approvals and this HWP is only valid in conjunction with same. Temporary seeding shall be: Annual Ryegrass spread at the rate of 30 lb/acre or 11.5 oz/1000 square feet OR Winter Ryegrass spread at the rate of 100 lb/acre or 36 oz/1000 square feet to uniformly cover the ground. Either of the two following seed mixes are acceptable for temporary seeding. *Annual Ryegrass —Lolium multiflorum, Commercial improved varieties *Winter Rye `Aroostook' —Lolium sp. `Aroostook', Commercial improved varieties Note: Temporary seeding is restricted to the following seasons: Annual Ryegrass—March 1 to September 30 `Aroostook' Winter Rye Grass—March 1 to April 1 or September 1 to November 30 " Page 2 of 2 rawwrKmaa David Paterson New York State Office of Parks, Governor ' Recreation and Historic Preservation Carol.Ash Historic Preservation Field Servk)es•.Peebles Island, PO Box 189,Waterford;New York 12188-0188 Commissioner 518-237-8643 www.nyaparke.conn p October 26,2009 D Ms.Mary Sullivan Assiatent to Deputy CEO Operations,Project Coordinator , Suffolk County Water Authority Sonthhoid town 4060 Sunrise Highway Poard of ?sustees Oakdale,NY 11769 Re: ARRA Brows'$Hill Water Main East Marion to Orient, Suffolk County Dear Mi. Sullivan: 09PR03458 , Thank you forrequesting the comments of the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO). We have reviewed the project in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. These comments are those of the SHPO and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources, They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that may be involved in of near your project Such impacts moat be considered as part of the environmerrtal review of the project pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Aot and/or the State Environnumtal Quality Review Act(New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 8). Virginia Batton of our National Register Unit advises that there are structures within the Area of Potential Effect that could be eligible for listing in the National Register'of Historic Places. However,.iit appears that these aftuctum will not-be atPected by the proposed work. Michael Sehifferli of our Arcbaaology Unit has no 4mbaeological coso6ms regarding the proposed work.It is the opinion of the 3HP0 that the proposed water rain work will have No-AdvaMe Effect on historic or cultural resources eligible for Bating or listed on the i. National Register of Historic Places Should you have any questions regarding our determination,please telephone me at(518)237-8643,ext 3287,or via email at elizabeth, nrrin p3j4➢'r'TMy.At�°• madly refer to the Project Review(PR)above in any future correspondence for the project Sincerely; Elizabeth Martin Historic Sites Restoration Coordinator I i An Equal.Opportunity FrnployedAMUmatlw Action Agency . . i i James F. King,President ��,Of souryo Town Hall Annex Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Peggy A. Dickerson yy T Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio,Jr. Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 D � � � o [� [ BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES D TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Permit No.: 7129A Date of Receipt of Application: June 18, 2009 Southhold Town Applicant: Suffolk County Water Authority enard of ?rustees SCTMS: N/A Project Location: Route 25, East Marion, over Dam Pond Channel Date of Resoludonllssuence: July 22, 2009 Date of Expiration: July 22, 2011 Reviewed by: Board of Trustees Prolect Deseriodon: For the installation of a 12" HDPE water main for the purpose of supplying drinking water and fire protection to the residents of East Marion residing east of Dam Pond channel. The grass area on the road's edge will contain all work pertaining to directional drilling (staging and receiving). The staging and receiving permits are to be approximately 300' east and west of the centerline. Depth of drill will be approximately 10' under the channel bottom. Hay bales and silt screen are to be installed to contain sediment laden run off. All excavation to be backfilled, stabilized and returned to the original condition. Excess fill to be removed and disposed of legally. Findings: The project meets all the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The issuance of an Administrative Permit allows for the operations as indicated on the site plan prepared by Suffolk County Water Authority last dated June 16, 2009, and received on June 18, 2009. Special Conditions: None. Inspections: Hay bale line with silt fencing inspection & final inspection. If the proposed activities do not meet the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, a Wetland Permit will be required. This is not a determination from any other agency. James F. King, President Board of Trustees JFK:eac James F. King,President ��Of suuryo Town Hall Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President 53095 Route 25 Peggy A Dickerson P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Telephone(631)765-1892 !!!� Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line ' 18<day of construction 'Y2 constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. 0 VOLD EES UI Amlh-a P. , bIT .t c Issued To Date Address ` �F.�hlar:�n. - � cJ�r►ne � THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y.:11971 TEL: 765-1892 KEY MAP SCALE 1 " -600' STANDARD SUBDIVISION 0F AOEEPH & HEIDI BATTAGLIAF U _ °M,AE a,Ed GN SOUTHOLD _�= CAST IRON INLET FRAME & COVER (FLOCKFIART #63518 TYPE 6540) • L�,r��� q m i FINISHED GRADE OR 6" THICK REINFORCED GGNG COVER TOWN O F S O U T H O L D SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK '( L' S.C. TAX No. 1000- 64-03-03 18" CORRUG. BE DRAIN srGDa PIPE OR APPROVED EOUAL SCALE 1 "=30' T- j l NL 'YO SOLID DOME r, MAY Pw�m \ Ls TO MIN EINFORCED PRECAST CON JULY 10, 2009 ADDED TEST HOLE A, PROP LOTS ""'"•"""" - "-'- '- ^^�v t� I TO NEXT UNIT 4000 PSI ® 26 DAYS C'p s FEBRUARY 12, 2009 REVISED WETLAND LINE tam ,n° APRIL 18, 2009 REVISE MAP s JANUARY 10, 2010 REVISED PER SC D,H,S. NOTICE No. 1 be an 1o'-D" FEBRUARY 12, 2010 LOCATE 2 PINE TREES TO REMAIN 1511 1,C o F y >\ m 9c CRUSHED 3/4• - 1-1/2• STONE TOTAL AREA = 101 ,022 sq. ft. tp , ALL AROUND (TO TIE LINE) 2.319 do. 1A7 \ • N I E @°LE,t. x 1 HE UPLAND AREA = 94,481 sq. ft. N 9UP a1 , e \ PA?m \ \ WETLAND AREA = 6,541 sr,. ft. \ ROD FT LEACHING RINGS 3'-0" loll i d 0i \\tiN \I \ r't3`�\ (loin) < F REINFORCED GPSI IS ze sDAYS NC m1n. 8�gG lCl; "� \, O UP m �'s, \I VIT SS OW be ISET - BE OM ,SES 1 j t EL 31 00' l 1 1 1 x IIP2 AS R� Re in FK, $°P sta8'"OE ON x 11 \ Bid Of ef, d NOTES: I , ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM TYPICAL STORMWATER UNIT EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:.s.o1. m \ - BP \ am EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: -- - --t0- \ TOTAL STORAGE PER UNIT = 1210 of - - - - i � ErL - nFsr FLOOR aim e`C°' SO \ / J. o2G' r(NOT TO SCALE) G'.FL - GARAGE FLUOR 4w - TOP of WALL 6 W - BOTTOM OF WALL 2, THIS PROPERTY IS WOODED TO THE EDGE OF THE WETLANDS WITH OVERGROWN LAWN AREA AROUND HOUSE. 0� / \ __LQ6 o � ' a 3, ZONING USE DISTRICT: R-40.TYPlCAL PLOT FLAN LOIT / yo xjA2 P_ v 4. DRYWELLS WITH GUTTER LEADERS TO CONTAIN RAINWATER RUN-OFF SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR (NOT TO SCALE) a $� 4/Ad'�s \ 43,213 SOL ft. TOTAt ANY FUTURE DEVELOREMENT OF THIS SUBDIVISION. 41 ,273 sq. ftl UPLANDIAR �q,EA c�/ \ � (�, 0' ,�j S. PROPOSED CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN AS AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 240-46(C) OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN TOWN CODE. Ip, 6. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS PROPERTY. PROPERTY LBJE aHR x � �� 1 ,940 sq. ft. IWETLAN D I AREA I t, (PROPOSE LEASING AREA = 20,6136 BE. ft. (SH% OF UPLAIfD AREA)\ Z ✓• GE \ PHI,A 1 I \ I xnaN2 • 2 � Oy ^`7t,A`� v 1\ \ 'fix I \\ �°0 a Oo `Hy ��\ p° �J Or 0 A f- r \ nyp \ 1 \ U x \ TFST HOLE °R"E,�" . •x �`. AD N°� \\) a I11� s��o �a \\ \, °p\ x xL`'-s Pyea -i Ya y TEXTURED BROOM FINISH .E PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE Up t e BUILDINGN°p0°� x x FOX Air peE° �� ✓ \ \ To \ — \\ s /\\ �rybe \ S \ Pp c WMECER O 0O ' So, �p — osEPTIC r��is'. \ \\ 20i^ 1 1 \ pk 1 Ea TANK So .� s Se e 4C F m1aOr ON PoFxm- 7.�s \\ \w \�n� _ \ate ss \ \ �,.1•ra 11 �6 \\ 0� M\as vs0p -- < LEACHING 4 �` J MIN Pool \ \ I \ L• "' / - -12 OIL \\ \\ \p — \ C 1°�x I xCzz I / a$ \ B B \ \ Erl\ \ 2\ / / / cl 1a • ROAD � S \ \\ OST \\ \/ // L�.ox/ °9a ° \ \\ SA �\ °, 0„ LOT 2 ° Se 20'-0" ExPANsoN JOINT -p`�O am\ 7 - - --11 r PLAN TYPICAL 9\?'n \\ I \I/Tzz 57,809 sq. ft. -TO-T -- fi - te �S S 2'• \ x 53,208 s ft. UPLAND AREA SCE, �o O', A' 6 \F/ \ I q' r FLOW LINE NUT, e�'O \ \ (PRgPDE\D cLE4nh601ARSEaq= ie'.6oWEq Lft AND07Ao>EAi`PUND RSA) 0 / 09 'c�, e (0, x.re 11•• 4 .. 2 \v dsr $� 1,1 xenH, \ \ \ - x1se�\ uH'r // I � �L,cFp 6„ SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEAL CH SERVICES $I 'Ly.w.0,o ,r���, \ \ \ \ � _ O S /yam HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. COS \\ \ \\ A�?za�4 .\ ��. \\ �a \\\ \ X/ las gh LeY0Cif, 78., Q \i Ili, Ore'_�„ 1 f \ E?, \ x'iz'3 / yP /yR � .a h a 9� T , t`Tti 9\ \ \ /o, / % / e` o� 2 0 Be \ \ \ b°s o\ \ / / f v SECTION B-B Dote — ,l p y. '9 ? \ T 2 \ \ \ _ _ _ _ _ __ xil•l•/ to ,oM >r / P/ O \� y'9 R \ \ — — SA' �,<'o�'s _ \\ \ rya '04 \ x i t e F �h�/ / 6 ^� \\ t" 3 T� \\\ \\\ \ //.thy'�[P-y�� //// _ \\ �\ IS 114" REVEAL � - 1/4"/FT / NPte,I' x / \ 14 FT` 6. This is to Certfy that the proposed Realty Subdicirr Ion or Development S(,• \ \ 'A \\ / SP i ,tee. REINFORCED CONCRETE swe �i _ g Mp. / 0„� \�µ',�/. 2" 3so0 Psl AT ze DAYS MIN far In the `� A \ \ \ p'Q \1 ,, � // / \\ \ a STEEL REwroRco waDED WINE With a total of lot was 6 6 \\ A+�C x 7o.e \ �t / \ . 6 l \ \ / eVY• . MESH, fiEINF -//6xW'6 .,proved as the above date. Water Suppl,CS Fnd Sew... Disposal •� e6, \\'\ O COMPACTS SUBGRAOE FECldtles must conform to construction standOms H effect at the time A' - / / � — r , SECTION A—A Of Construction ono are subject to separate perml,S pursuant to those 1i' / L / f standards This approval shall be v.11d only If th- realty subdivision/ \ nh / /' / MT, ~\ development map duly fled with the County Fork 'thin one year \ y I hereby certify that the water supply(s)s and/or sewage disposal system(s) for this ro ect / l / "'�'z of this d0 se Consent Is hereby 91°°^ 'ar the Los Within map °^ / a f CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON wnlan this endorsement appears In the office of the county Clodt ,n Y v pPvO / 9 P project �, \ \ / / azs. accordance with the or......ns ME me Public Hamm L.w and the were designed by me or under my direction. Based upon a careful and thorough study of ``ywo ��� / / / -- 4�° • � ffolk County Samta,y Code the soil, site and groundwater conditions, all lots, INS proposed, conform to the Suffolk County /� 4-d'e ` /ram ° ae\ \ (NOT TO SCALE) Department of Health Services construction standards in effect as of this date 4 �"d, _ _ _� / / ) / - o °J�s 2� Fm9 \\ °—°-- - -- - // // / 4 i WAR // / //N 1,�4 \Ito A, MITI P.E Director, Dlvlsmn of 'Envlmnmental Quality ` Op \I \ ` / / p '0 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION rV p p \ tlld, S TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTSV V \\ D \ — EDUCATIONE09 fAWOF THE NEW YOftN STATE TEST HOLE DATA S2 .Ili. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING 5•, \ THE LAND sureVEYOR'S INKED GOAL OR (TEST HOLE DUG BY Mc00NAL0 GEOSCENCE ON JULY 3, 2008) \ i p5 _ EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED 41 ,K5 TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY ELEV. 42' 0' r 9°H\' IN 0P MIND k GRAVEL � GE p1 f° �b�\B` a 1{ CER71FICA110N5 INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM DETAIL ap�E° F,ULG)" t3 r<,�l '�.` J2 ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY ., C, 4 O IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE (NOT TO SCALE) 9 � pa oy \( O a y 1`P ``\1� O TIRE COMPANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND BROWN SILT ML '� eo`" g ! 11 ` •F LEENDH G INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND ,,9' —— p• �PY (a`.�� \`tf�w p� [ ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- HOu [ ��,.R�0 3� O ♦ Q TUTION CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSrERABLE ss s, FINISHER cRwE N \' ar�y4 OK'J ooy`v Q e =\ Q.� ���LJyJ4 Be rocY/ PREDAsr ReuFoflcso coNz REEF covEn Isx HA°s ,/ /^ �\ PIE° 1 °ESP min P mm 44'tllo LOCKING WATERRGHT k INSECT PROOF EL£V J}.Y ,A• ,III. O �.J �' Jh C'�S 1 Q P,' OTt 2a' CAST IRox covcfl To GruDE M FURTHEST LEACHING POOL l `;5'22" 33 �30° L v\ 1� \ P,S� _ 7,3, ry ^o V � Q- AND EXISTENCE OF EASEMENTS OFRIGHT RECFOR RECORD,WAYS PA eflown FINE sP .IN. Ni OUR n epi L lao' 3 \ / ° Had./, PELLv ,e,- zo-m�n PE - OF A 3 POOL SYSTEM 8 4 'a4 10 MEDIUM SING vlicxe0 1 a I' 1 piiLNEO i/6"/T a 2 s L7 '�� AV Q\ V PC ANY. NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. 6. P E ]' CLOAK tT (y-,! A. wv EL_JSI �m u Ider w0p O\,Al A#^ >° V I EN. INVERT IpVPr n cpuM A. SrWA 4 ELLV.]1G EL£V f 1• m' 3• ✓ woo. 0�'$q o Ferw *.r2� - lJ\ 'B'W ROARO 5 q,^O' PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM El£V G 6' S F o e O STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED GRo1N0 WATER 1,6' - �• 4 Nathan Waft Corwin III (,� ti BY THE LLA.L S. AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED J t)' l p P FOR SUCH USE BY THE STATE LAND S. '`2 TITLE ASSOCIATION caoDNA,ER .O , �s`°o `E OF NE4yy Land Surveyor NATEA IMPALE BROWN FINE sP El£V §,;f TO MEDIUM RAND r�i vs O,(pET C ORS SEPTIC TANK (1) q — 1 M PII NIMUM SEC LANE CAI'Verse FOR A 6 BEDROOM MOUSE IS 1.500 G\LLONS �O TITANS, 6' k 5' LIQUID BEPOI 4 ?' 1]' CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGN aF],000 all AT 3° WTS 'Y — a WAITCDE ORE S ss slw.L BE A mwwuM of r, A roP TwcuNEss OF 6" AND A 6DOE TH¢xxFss OF P. LEACHING POOLS (31 7 I d -CCE litlB Surveys - Subdrvrslons - Site Pions - Construction Layout ALL WALIS, B070M AND TOP SHALL DOMAIN REINF°RCIM N RESIST AN APPLIED FORCE OF USE psi MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR A fi BEDROOM HOUSE 15 40D iq f[ SIDEWALL AREA �C t"`.� PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 a ALL JOINTS SHALL 6E SUEED SO THAT THE TANK IS WATEWIGM ] POOLS ' DEEP, S' TEo ` ,,� RE SEPTIC LANK SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEVEL IN ALL DIRECTIONS (WITH A MAX.TOLERANCE OF k1/a") T LUCHING POOLS ARE TJI BE CON_ UCTE OF PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE (afl EQUAL) b 1 \ S ON A MINIMUM ]'CHICK 6E0 Of COMPACTED SAND OR PU GRAVEL IF,,CHING STRUCTURES. OLIO DOHES AND/OP SLABS 6 A 10 min DISTANCE BETWEEN sEWIC iANlt AND HOUSE SHALL BE MAINTAINED. ] ALL COVERS SHALL BE OF PRECAST REINFORCED CON SEIE (OR EQUAL) a A 10' mm 0lsrnxcE eE1w¢ry LEACHING POOLS ADD WATER THE sHut eE mINTAw¢o, �1Fo4k1Fv7 OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS S AN e' mm DISTANCE BETWEEN ALL LEACHING POOLS SHALL BE MAIxPINm `A.,� OR V 322 A....ke Avenue P,0 Box 1931 ut N X.S TO, Na. 50457 Riverhead, New York 11901 RNefhECd, New York 11901-0965 28— PROPOSED SE(NOT SCALE STEM DETAIL SURVEY OF PROPERTY NDNEE SITUATE FRO CIV➢E (\'� T T T N T T1-�1 �] PR RECAST REIN O�m°N1 OEW�CGVfA FlNLSH CR,DE S O V 1 1 O LL \0 yo CP OHIO ZGAS!NNN°COVER 7.EBUDE k INSECT PI10CG �ELLV.ILZ F Sid 1� FURTHEST LEACHING POOL DI s MIN CMIo. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ctl pVy Og Raem Ii iwi• Tor Euv.Ja.a °in1n' ,rPnwin X. roP e" 1e'0 OF A 3 POOL SYSTEM FDCHm Vey,' R . q a N — e o SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK E d� l¢tg 4c4 2 -� T` ' S.C. TAX No. 1000-64-03-03 t�EsiGti 6 00 SCALE 1 =30 ap2Ls1 BNAR MAY 28, 2008 / SEPTIC TANK (11 JULY 10. 2008 ADDED TEST HOLE & PROP. LOTS >\ DECEMBER 9, 2008 ADDED PROPOSED HOUSE \ I. MwIMUM swot TANK FUAcmEs mR A BEDROOM MUSE IE uW WOLOMS. DECEMBER 29, 2008 LATH PROP. HOUSE FOR SITE INSPECTION TANK, R oN s' MUD .. JANUARY 12, 2009 ADDED TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY CONCRETE SW KwE A MINIMUM COMPREESNE EIRENG O OF 3.00 pY AT M OXFS 3. Wa INCKNES9 SHALL ME A MINIMUM OF a,A Tor MORRISS OF fi'AND A BDDOM THmKNL OF a•. LEACHING POOLS (3) FEBRUARY 9, 2009 ADDED WETLAND BUFFER' 2 J1 1 Au wANs, BOTTOM MO TOP SINLL CONMN RaxmRENG TO RESIST AN AFPAm FORCE OF m0 yT MARCH 17, 2009 REVISED HAY BALE LINE a, NO 4 I1L.1. M.BE E. SD TINT HE TAN. IS WATmR°M. 1. MINIMUM IFICWNO 5/EI!]I MR A fi emRCOY HOUSE le WJ N w SIDEWNL AAFA. o E sEFIC ruWK SHu RE wsrAum AT IEw. IN uL SIREcn°xs (wnH A MAT.TOUeWMME OF aVa7 3 P°°IS; e' BEEF. e' ma. APRIL 3, 2009 REVISED HAY BALE LINE ��'J• Q F' \ N A MINIMUM T THICK Om OF COMPACTED RAND OR PU NOWE_ 2 OVER NO PODTS ME RI BE CONEFRUCIED °F PREVSr REINFORCE) MNCREE(OR EWIA) APRIL 18, 2009 UPDATED WETLAND LINE 1 \ e. BA RI mm DISTANCE BEMEFH EFPDC TANK NIO NOME SP BE MVMAINm TFICHINC MUMMIES, MOM WINES IHD/CR sMMs. 3 Al CmmS E BE OF PRmlSr RExmxcm CON SETS {OR m,NL). JANUARY 14, 2010 REVISED PROPOSED HOUSE TO' mm. OEOME BErxEvu .41. PWIs AND wATEI, ONE SHML BE MMNLV.m APRIL 15, 2010 ADDED FLOOD ZONES oT y \ \ s Ax 9• mm DISTANCE eETNIIx Au IFACx:No ME 1E sXN1 BE MVNruxm. INDIENNCE BEPAFEX ALL LEACHING PPom AND S.0 TAN. S.BE MVMAINm d� 14\g�gc�' t \ \ O'\' TOTAL(TO REAuNE) 2.319 acsq. ft. Jp��4p1 LE _ I ; \I \I I \ UPLAND AREA = 94,481 sq. ft, DRAINAGE SYSTEM CALCULATIONS: 1 3 I I I 46 \ HOUSE ROOF AREA: 5.300 sq. ft. _CERTIFIED TO. 5,300 sq. ff. X 0.17 = 901 cu. ft. JOSEPH BATTAGLIA 901 cu. ff. / 42.2 = 22 vertical ft. of e' die. leaching pool required m g .�-h 1 \ " HEIDI BATTAGLIA m { \ \ I PROVIDE (4) 8' die. X 6' high STORM DRAIN POOLS ' PECONIC ABSTRACT, Inc. `\\ PROPOSED 8' DIA. X 6' DEEP DRYWELLS FOR ROOF RUN-OFF ARE SHOWN THUS: '.'_s FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I' '3-`\ �^I TITLE No. FNP-01504 O GARAGE ROOF AREA: 1,020 sq. ff. , Ws ^>; 1,020 sq. ft. X 0.17 = 174 cu. ff. o I �a 174 cu. ft. / 42.2 = 5 vertical ff. of 8' die. leaching pool required Vt� PROVIDE (1) 8' die. X 6' high STORM DRAIN POOL �,�' "�' — `I 1-� NOTES: PROPOSED 8' DIA. X 6' DEEP DRYWELLS FOR ROOF RUN-OFF ARE SHOWN THUS: N 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM \•i1il c I / xI I I 1 / / �, l EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUSs° T' I %� 251 10'. EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: - - -- -tG- -- - - ,W I I L T I1 i FFL - FIRST FLOOR 1v I I 43,23 q. ft( TOTAL I GFL - GARAGE DOOR 5 6 / 149K I ( t-r1 - s53�/ �cs \ oe� 1 I I 41 ,273 F,q. ft. UPLAND AREA I •l rw TOP OF w,w. \ � B W - BOIIOM OF WAll / / %" \\ •"° , \ \\ I I 1,940 s�.- fij WETLAND ARIEA \ 2. MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES FOR A 6 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 1,500 GALLONS. (PROPOSED CLEARING ARE) 2 ,636 s4. ft. (50% OFl UPLAND AREA) \ I 1 TANK; 8' DIA. 5' LIQUID DEPTH x 3. MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR A 6 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 400 sq ft SIDEWALL AREA. N \ AL TEST HOLE 3 POOL; PROPO EDBE%PANSION POOL PROPOSED LEACHING POOL Pt' PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK ya V U3 \ \ I In SG \ \ bon ,o, \ \ ' Q�' 4. THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD /' \A )�- T,j \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ 13 \ OBSERVATIONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. �N \ WM` II 5. EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM STRUCTURES SHALL BE PUMPED CLEAN AND Z \ \ ILS, \ f ` _ a REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.C.D.H.S. STANDARDS. 'P• \ \ ` \ \ \,Up — r O \ � 1 6. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: 'AiP, / ����� \\ \ ,� \ ` 1 I�Y�� �.• AA �' \ ED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36103CO166 H ooa 00 RR2�° 1\ ? ZONE AE: BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED $ �/ 10\ /+�<• \ \ \o 4,4 \ A \ 'e ` „ / 'W \\ Oj+ v0o ZONE VE' COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCTIY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION); \ O �' sA { '\ \ • ";\ �p7 Ti ,yo_ BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED �G �G� —12 ZONE X`' AREAS OF 02% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, AREAS OF 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD .1 • /• \ x 0�iy \� WITH AVERAGE DEPTH OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN A oGyilk, \ \ yTA I A\ �� p /' v. , • \ \ 1 SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD ZONE X: AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. OO" PPo�1x� S�, \\\ \ `\ J t` f/' . .. .. / (�-"'y \ a VIoPEb 7. LOT COVERAGE LOT i (HOUSE, PORCHES d[ GARAGE) = 6,310 sq. ft. DR 11.9% OF UPLAND AREA. '0 31 \ \ 9o0�yo A -/'N \ ypAs�\ T��, ,x\;d P�cAx. �T h` / •� % ad, o / /e �y �I Pik , TEST HOLE DATA O Cie \\ \ \ O,A \ \ �\ �x `A . /aq N` / \,F '�L (TEST HOLE DUG BY MCDONALD GEOSCIENCE ON JULY 3, 2008) \ \ _ A \D \ \ .�. \ I I / / 2 LS1 P \ tiA \ \ ,-�.\ hw._ . .. I / / { _ SVP'L do 024' EUEv. Iu' D. _"3Ff •� ` Y // y/ � 'A,y Mlxm swD c GRAYEL BROWN SO ML 3. •�Y 2Lr,, \\ \ \ \ `.` ` / Ny — /' Q, PA BRRMA FINE sP Z _ ( TD MmIDM SAN. 4 2w 4 J. 110, h�u9% 57,809 sq. ff. AL WArw IN PALE MOWN FINE sP T 6j', '� \W _ __ 53,208 sq. ft. UPLAND AREA/ / / — � o TBMmIOM EwO P/ 2 g - -4,601 sq. ft. XETLAND APEX � �J,�•, �9 \ _ OP05ED - EkNINCAREA 26. sq ft (50W Ofi UPLVW D AREA)/ (.)• � 'OS .. TO THIS SURVEY IS IS ATUIOWnOAOO moN EDUCAT N LA OF THE NEW MORN STALE 3s, G G C�1� E 1 COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING O\44�4� GJ 44�y \Ii EMBOSSED SEAL SHMJ_ NOTED 1NED SURVEYOR'S INKNBE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY Dw \\Z `\ Y SU�SNM 3,+ v,p'�\•= ^,+ ��/���04=0 1 ONLCEFFYFTO HE INDICATED HEREON SHE SURVEY RUN 8 _ oy \y O J Q ZQ IO 5N PREPARED AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE 9 J Ip\ O G 4 O Oc 4 SEn 5 n1LE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND ,p O 5H \I Gj!\�� V�h I_ENDING IF ARSONEESONOF THE LENDING INS11N. 0 TO - N yf 44 fel ^; eO�� \,�VO Sph ' UnON. CERRFlC nONS ME NOT P NS Ue E 74•`;•5 A22" \ •+3� �h y0'� G ^ THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS ,3'8 1,T, ANDOR 2A Yv ^�� '� 04�1r �� ANY/NOT EA NOT SEMENTARE FOGUARANTEED. 2 'xaua \ a'T�o lJx 06.D BgAR05 (kd PREPARED IN R ITTLEANCESUR WITH THE MINIMUM Nathan -f of t Corwin III \ 4 STANDARDS FOR TOLE SURVEYS AS BY THE LI.ALS. AND APP O I lJL FOR SUCH USE BY THE NEW O TGIF ASSOCIATION 3�P wAS�TCOyO Land purveyor 4 ' I TWO Surveys - STIbdIMISF.O5 - Sit. Plans - CcOetrucboG Layout <1p @ /I p, Q' PHONE (631)727-209G Fax (631)727-1727 OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS 1586 Our Rood P.O. Box 16 N Y.S. U.. No. 50467 Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamespod. New York 11947 CASE TWO CASE THRE.0 CASE 0 N E NEW MAIN INSTALLED WITHIN ROAD EIGHT OF WAY, NEW MAIN INSTAII_LED WITHIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NEW MAIN INSTALLED WITHIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE ARE REQUIRED HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE ARE REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES OF ROAD NO HAY BALES OR SILT FENCE ARE REQUIRED DUE TO HEAVY SLOPE AND GROUND WATER, DUE TO HEAVY SLOPE AND GROUND WATER, DUE TO LANDSCAPING AND DRIVEWAYS. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE RECESSED 4" INTO GROUND THE SILT FENCE WILT. BE RECESSED 4" INT❑ GROUND AT THE END OF EVER`( DAY THE TRENCH WILL AT IHE END ❑F EVERY DAY THE T '.ENCH WILL AT THE END OF EVERY DAY THE TRENCH WILL BE PAVED WITH ASPHALT. AFTER ASPHALT IS IN PLACE BE PAVED WITH ASPHALT AFTER ASPHALT IS IN PLACE BE PAVED WITH ASPHALT, AFTER ASPHALT IS IN PLACE HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE CAN BE MOVED (ADVANCE) , HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE CAN BE MOVED (ADVANCED) HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE CAN BE MOVED (ADVANCED) DOWN TRENCH WITH NEW WATER MAIN, DOWN TRENCH WITH NEb/ WATER rw,IN' DOWN TRENCH WITH NEW WATER MAIN. Ik LANDS A 1. .atl LANDS .,,X a,.pd dy a "t � NET W,y pp J'1p UO LANDS % ' �J EXISTING E%li QNG E%lii1NG EXIST) L� Si1NG / - l %/ iJST[IJG EXISTING I f S' 0 r t�yl u HOUSE E IISTI - IIppBE �- HOUSE Ih lSE HOUEF HOUSE �; / ENLSE EXISTING HOUSE PoIUSf E%IS rLP1G EXIST EXIST �Ex6T ExIST EXIST �E <I0a' Y A �/ ROUSE _ <100' / by EXL:TIN6 DWY DWY �100' )DWY ➢VI DVY E%FT E%16T / _ \\ ➢Wy DWY I 11 /, fXISi EXIST / HOUSE 1\I NEi DVY DWY 11\ VEi r ANDS / E%1ST LAID➢S p ➢VT E%IST ➢' -- HPY BALE dN➢ SILI FENCE —_- -- _ - - _ --_— --- Z�.S —_ - - HfiY BALE" AND SILT FENCE NEW WATER HAIN -- NEW WATER MAIN -1 — �IEMPORARY L➢CATI➢N ➢P L'NCRVgIC➢ SI IL T"NP➢RART IOC61IDN OF EXCAVATED Sp L _ ' NEW WATER MAIN � ., TEMPORARY L [ i OF EXCAVATED S —- --_- - --- - - HAY DALE AND SILT FENCE lI'W 25' —may I�r 25• 110D• aDD a0D. l N V ELOPED LAND E%IST EXIST EXIST EXIST DW(EXIY ➢XI DWY DWY OVf DWY Ex"I E%IST EXIST EXIST EXIST E%ISi EXIST OVY DVY OWY ➢VY ➢VY EX STING E%ISTING E%ISTIIJG ENISTiNG Er STING - DWI' DWY HOUSE HOUSE {pUSE HOUSE - Hp liC F.%ISTMG EXISTING E%LrO.� EXISTING EXISTING �-- EXISTING EXISTING L -- HOUSE OUSE OUSE HOUSE HOUSE --_ HOUSE HOUSE 0 IT CR02. � SC'-IIOIV "A"-"A" CROSS SECTION "B"-'B' SPECIAL NOTE, SPECIAL NOTE) HAY BALES ANP., SD_ ( FEITP_E l O BE HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE TO DE LAID OUT 25 FEE) BEYON➢ WEI LHIN11 ARI A LAID OUT CS FEET BEYOND WE I AND AREA IF A TRENCH PUMP 1:. U`LD I:MAX 4u GPM , IE A TRENCH PUMP IS. USED IHIAX 40 GPM) ANII A STEEP SLOPE ENI',1 ': THE >D-T ENCE AND STEEP SLOPE EXISTS, THE RIL.T FENCE WILL BE DUG INTO GROUND TO A DFPTH LE 4' 1,, ILL BE DEC INT❑ GROUPJD TO A DEPTH OF 4" SPECIAL NOTE, Nu l Ei SILT FENCE )AND HAY B ''_ ES V H-1- BE DUG 11VT L) Gh,IIUiND N❑ SILT FENCE AND HAY BALES ONLY ON STEEP SLOPE.`, •difH GROUND'WATEr: Y ARF REQUIRED IN DEVELOPED) AREAS 1 ❑NLY S[LT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED % IF THE AREA IS LEVEL AND DRY / [DAL WATER I1DAL yz-------- WATEI ,' WATER WATER - -- WAH F �__ w tJ 2 Q 3 3 3 3 <100' o --- <100' --- - E o w u t- ~ a 3 3 H_ EW `, 1- 1 \li_ WA EEL' MAIN - —�� --- PRE7I- ' I-1 -I Ill H ^, F'IAL_ E JIM W E L_ �, I'J Ii L-: C P� D I=; R Y — _ T I D-AFL_ _.B CJ I,l f\i_U r 'r �_.-- ---------- (� L N/ D 010 EXIST W �� D �, AiLW"t � E �uouz5z Sa Town Board rtl of of T Trustees NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM NY STATE PLANE L I ZO FEET. NE 3104, VATUdC I92'NAC Suffolk Caunty Water Auth0_1'1ty 4060 Sunrise H19hwoy Caktlale, NY 11769 rae ��_•.-_•_�_r_— _—DEC GENERAL PF..RMI7'2010 AEC9GENF_RAL PERMIT-(I) Note Drown BY.ERNESTO ROSINI TOWn:COVERS ALL OF SUFFOLK COUNTY -RI r -nimn on .NYS R DOb:1 29 2010 sneer 1 D 2 T.R.N COVERS ALL OF SUFFOLK COUNTY O A'A to ne gone D. Ni S P spc -Vi,— :.rods & offsets may be ra rod T� CASE EDUR CASE FIVE CASE SIX NEW MAIN INSTALLED WITHIN READ RIGHT OF WAY NEW MAIN INSTALLED WITHIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NEW MAIN INSTALLED WITHIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, NO HAY BALES OR SILT FENCE ARE REQUIRED HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE ARE REQUIRED HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE ARE REQUIRED DUE TO HEAVY SLOPE AND DUE TO LANDSCAPING AND DRIVEWAYS. ON BOTH SIDES OF ROAD. SINCE NO SLOPE EXISTS GROUNDWATER, AT THE END OF EVERY DAY THE TRENC WILL THE SILT FENCE WILL NOT BE RECESSED INT❑ THE GROUND THE SILT FENCE WILL BE RECESSED INT❑ THE GROUND. BE PAVED WITH ASPHALT. AFTER ASPHALT IS IN PLACE AT THE END OF EVERY DAY THE TRENCH WILL AT THE END OF EVERY DAY THE TRENCH WILL BEL PAVED WITH ASPHALT. HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE CAN BE MO'/FD (ADVANCED) BE PAVED WITH ASPHALT, AFTER ASPHALT IS IN PLACE AFTER ASPHALT IS IN PLACE HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE CAN BE MOVED DOWN TRENCH WITH NEW WATER MAIN. HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE CAN BE MOVED (ADVANCED) (ADVANCED) DOWN TRENCH WITH NEW WATER MAIN, DOWN TRENCH WITH NEW WATER MAIN, u � d eA LANDS may' yp� �y ' Apr. 1 °",al vd LANDS �t WET IL . LANDS Uj� \1 - EXISTING ESISI IIJG � // ( ' E%ISTING EX.IGfING �• HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE HOE ESOSfING EXISTING j T ,J HOUSE HOUSE US pp' EXIST EXIST / ` HOU EING — flood "C NOUSEIN6 ➢VY pVY 'C' EXIST EXIST LAN➢S / E%ISi OVY DINT LA11-kNDS D / DX DVYT VET ,E, pX EXIST LANDS ANY 1, HAY DALL AND SILT rl NCE HAY ➢RLE AND- SILT FENCE HAY BALE AND SILT FENCE NEW WATER MAIN _ EXISTING VATER MAIN DER MAI TEMPORARY LOCATION OF EXCAVATED SOI. LEMPORgRY LOCATION OF EXCAVATED SOIL NEW WATER HAM TEMPORARY LOCATION OF EXCAVATED SOIL HAT BALE AND E1Lr FENCE HAY DALE AND SILT FENCE <1DD, 2Y —o� E• (10D• DWST EXIST my EXIST EXIST IDD' ➢WY DINT pHY DVY DVY EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST OWY pVY pVY pVY ➢WY EXI E%ISTING EXISTING E%ISTIIJG EXISTING EXISTING ^ EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING HOUSE HOUSE TONS HOUSE HOUSE / HpI15E ABUSE HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE II 9/cyI\ -c�6 cH y\ V CROSS SECTION 'C_'C' CROSS SECTION 'D'-'D CROSS SECTION 'E'-'E" SPECIAL NLITE SPECIAL NOTE HAY DALES AND SILT FENCE TO kE SPECIAL NOTE, HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE TO BE LAID 6UT 25 FEET BEYOND WET LAND AREA ET BEYOND WET LAND AREA HAY BALES AND SILT FENCE To BE LAID ❑UT 25 FE �II A TRENCH OM.' I, USED (MAX 40 GPM) LAID OUT 25 FEET BEYOND WET LAND AREA IF A TRENCH PUMP IS USED (MAX 40 GPM) AND A STEEP SIL&E EXISTS, THE SILT FENCE IF A TRENCH PUMP IS USED (MAX 40 GPM) AND A STEEP SLOPE EXISTS, THE 'SILT FENCE WILL BE DUG INTO GROUND TO A DEPTH OF 4" AND A STEEP SLOPE EXISTS, THE SILT FENCE WILL BE DUG INT❑ GROUND TO A DEPTH OF 4- IF NO TRENCH PUMP IS USED, THE SILT WILL BE DUG INTO GROUND , A DEPTH OF E FENCE WILL BE USED ALONE SPEC-AL NolEt SPECIAL NOTE, SILT FENCE I�ND HAY BALES T❑ SURROUND EXISTING NO SILT FENCE AND HAY BALES WILL BE USED SPECIAL NOTE DRAINh!]E 10 PREVENT ANY SEDIMENT OF IN FLAT AREAS WITH NO GROUNDWATER AREAS SILT FENCE AND HAY BALES i WATER 10 EATER THE WET LANDS ARE NOT REQUIRED IN DEVELOPED AREAS i �\ Z_1�11 U E ••• - - ---- 1 HOUSE ----�,-- - �`----TIDAL 1�-/lam-' - a -- TIDAL "�-- WATEn' ��_� WATER TIDAL WATER -_-J \` WATER —� WATER WATER l-J Q 3 Q H- 3 3 3 -- <100' - ----- -- - <100' - "- <100' o J J n/ K W / — V \ W W < - 3 < 3 3 s NEW MAIN 1NSIALLED WITHIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY � z OUTSIDE THE ASPHALI IN THE SHOULDER. NO HAY BALES OR SILT FENCE ARE REQUIRED = DUE TO EXISTING ROAD. AT THE END OF EVERY DAY THE TRENCH WILL BE PAVED WITH ASPHALT. 1�,�11F' 1µ1 VEr ✓^__V.�J_ — �� ��� r^2.,� � � ��a0 4ay T LAN "ELIE 1 HOUSE IfIG I il1USE1NG HOUSENG Hp=BEING KEY VII-T DJWIYT (Ipll DVYT DVYT pW1yT E X I STING V�� L LAND J rvew vgrcN nnni_ EXISTING WhTLR MAIN %\ -- �`—=EMPEIRAR UCATIDN nF EXCAVATED SUIL NEW WATER 1'sfaIN EXISTING Sl RE ET --❑� PROF-') USED df/10' BALES y� RI uNDI : T �_� r BF_ D FARJH m � — -�� WET LAND BDL. NDARY -i - TIDAL B ❑ U N D A : ------- ,�1 // ® EXIS _ INh Df ' AI vJAGS_ _ NOTE: COORDINATE SrJEfA: N.Y, STATf PIANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM NAD.1927 Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway Oakdale, NY 11769 ype IA ec DEC GENERAL PERMIT 2010 I DEMENERALRAiL PERMIT42) otes: Dmwn EY:ERNESTO ROSIN, Town.COVERS ALL OF SUFFOLK COUNTY —AM restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. Date4/29/2010 Shwt 2 Of 2 r x snip' COVERS ALL OF SUFFOLK COUNTY specs. —Mist. bends & offsets may �_ be required SOUTHOLD CITIZENS FOR SAFE ROADS SOUTHOLD TOWN—A Destination -- Not A Corridor P.O. Box 473 Orient,New York 11957 July 14, 2010 James King, Chairman The Southold Town Trustees Southold Town Hall Dear Mr. King, We request that you keep the hearing on the application by Suffolk County Water Authority open for several weeks beyond July 21,so that residents who cannot attend that evening may be able to consider the application and submit their comments. Thank you � C / �-- Fredrica Wachsberger, President Southold Citizens for Safe Roads it f !J I_ PO Box 25 Greenport, NY 11944 631-477-0444 Email: saferoads@optonline.net Page 1 of 2 Standish, Lauren From: BKLYNPHYS@aol.com Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 5:53 PM Sauthatd TUA nrd of TTSlees To: Standish, Lauren , F —A Cc:Cc: bklynphys@aol.com; keriock@me.com; amalc@pobox.com; news@orientwater.info; Ifeigelson@aol.com;jfried172@aol.com; Barbara.Delano@DownState.Edu Subject: [NEWSENDER] -Wetlands Pipeline Permit Application by SCWA-Message is from an unknown sender Dear Lauren Standish Since I will not be able to attend the Southold Town Trustees meeting on July 21, 1 would appreciate it very much if you would place copies of this email in the mailboxes of the Board members listed below because I have very strong opinions regarding the application by Suffolk County Water Authority for a wetlands permit to lay a 12" pipeline in the road bed of Route 25 that passes by Dam Pond. I think there are potentially disastrous pipeline consequences that they should be aware of. Thank you, Michael D. Delano To Southold Town Board of Trustees: Jill Doherty, President James King,Vie-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio Jr. John Bredemeyer My name is Michael D. Delano and I have a PhD in physics and extensive Post Doctoral Fellowship training in astrophysics and physiological physics. My wife, Barbara G. Delano, MD, MPH, is a Full Professor of Medicine and a Full Professor of Public Health at SUNY Down State medical school in Brooklyn. I mention these credentials in order to emphasize that we are not armatures when it comes to scientific matters and strongly urge you to deny SCWA's wetlands permit application until a thorough, independent, environmental impact study is done to evaluate the fragility of Dam Pond's ecosystem. Here's why: 1) For 191t2 year we have owned a house and a three acre plot of land whose southern boundary extends across Route 25 to Orient Harbor. We have right of way to Dam Pond and Trumans Beach where we have easily walked our Golden Retrievers 2000 times in that time period and I doubt that there is anyone who knows that ecosystem as well as we do. For example: on the north shore of Dam Pond is a rare variety of Sea Lavender that is on the EPA protected list. There is an extensive colony of several thousand fiddler crabs. There are ribbed-horse mussel that filter the water so marine microorganisms can thrive there. My wife and I have used a research-grade microscope to examine Dam Pond's waters and have been continually startled by the vast variety of micro-marine organisms that live there. Before we bought this place we asked our son, who has a BS in marine biology and an MS in oceanography , to look it over: Our son, after eight hours of inspection, said that there were no trees in the Dam Pond region that were older than 90 years and wondered if there was periodic flooding that might be responsible and seriously questioned the long-term stability of this unique, but fragile, ecosystem. 2) 1 have done some map measurements and calculations that may be of interest to you. Dam Pond has a water surface area of 100 acres, a mean depth of 4 feet and contains about 130 million gallons of salt water. Because of the tides in Orient Harbor about 1.5 billion gallons of water of flow in and out of Dam Pond in the course of a year; all of it through that narrow channel over which the Route 25 bridge passes and under which the proposed water main would tunnel. While very rare, I have seen harbor water barreling through that narrow channel at speeds approaching 15 mph during severe storms. A one foot section of that proposed pipeline exposed to such violent flows would experience a force of 15,000 pounds and I seriously wonder if 7/19/2010 Page 2 of 2 SCWA has considered the very real possibility of rupture and its consequences for Dam Pond. Note that the interior salinity of marine organism and plant cells is the same as that of their exterior salinity: If pure H2O due to pipe rupture surrounds the indigenous living cells in Dam Pond they will swell and burst and die because of absorption of pure H2O by osmosis! 3) Dam Pond has an extensive system of sandy mud-flats that are stabilized by an equally extensive root system of marsh-like grasses. If pollutants kill the root system, the mud-flats will eventually be disrupted by tides and the only thing separating Orient Harbor from the Long Island Sound is Trumans Beach which is less than 75 yards wide. In the 191/2 years we have been here the ferry traffic along Route 25 has increased substantially and I have seen the accumulation of auto-exhaust oil deposits in the western terminus of Dan Pond. Accompanying this pollution has been accompanied by the gradual disappearance of beach grass and sea lavender on the south-western shore of Dam Pond. What will be the pollutants and ecological consequences of a tunnel-pipeline excavation on Route 25 adjacent to Dam Pond?. Its hard to believe, but the only thing that separates Orient from the"Long Island Main Land" is skinny Trumans Beach. Could SCWA's pipeline project turn Orient into an island like Plum Island? urge you, in the strongest possible terms, to deny SCWA's permit application and insist that a thorough, independent, environmental impact study on the Dam Pond region be done should SCWA renew their application. Sincerely, Michael D. Delano Retired Associate Professor of Physics(Hofstra University) 15435 Route 25 East Marion, NY 11939 631-477-9531 7/19/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Ceil Sharman [ceilsharman@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 2:31 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: instead of water STOP, please....I do not believe there is sufficient evidence warranting the value and need for changing the present method of water acquisition in Orient! Nor do I see accurate documentation of a thorough environmental report or know what the new plan would take from our existing aquifers. Instead, how about promoting burying the utility poles along the causeway between East Marion and Orient? This is one of the most beautiful sections of roadway in the N. Fork, blighted by the poles and wires. Further, drivers race to the Ferry, and several have been seriously injured or even fatally wrapped their cars around the poles. The S. Fork seems to have managed to bury their poles, and I surely wish we could too. Sincerely, Ceil Sharman Orient ----c--- L s ;Id lv:n e�a-a o� 1��aees 7/19/2010 Standish, Lauren From: John and Nina Winter bohnandnina@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:50 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Orient water-Wednesday evening's hearing of SCWA Dear Lauren and the Southold Board of Trustees, we respectfully request that the Board kindly consider implementing a full comprehensive environmental impact and risk study concerning the proposed SCWA's plan to construct a water main under Dam Pond's sensitive eco-system. Until such time the Board is satisfied following the study, we urge that the permit for the construction not be granted. Thank you very much. Sincerely, John & Nina Winter Orient uolTrustees 1 Brown's Hills Estates, Inc. ` P.O.Box 254 Orient, New York 11957 Jill Doherty,President, Southold Board of Trustees; James King,Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio Jr. John Bredemeyer lJ L'� J—J`J f July 20,2010 So;lii ;tlTc :n Faard ai Trusiees Dear President Doherty and Trustees, RE: SCWA application for wetlands permit for pipeline to Browns Hills,Orient On behalf of the residents of Browns Hills Estate Inc.,I am writing to ask you to dismiss SCWA's latest application for a permit to drill under Dam Pond and in other sensitive areas,to bring a water main into Orient. Their previous application was for a small segment of a much larger project: all of Orient.None of us living on Browns Hills heard anything about their proposal until the Fall of 2009.Neither we,nor anyone else in Orient was present to raise the alarm when you reviewed that permit. Since then,we have all learned a lot. We believe any one of the following is grounds for dismissal or rejection of the permit in its current form and at the present time: 1. The application is for a segment of the project as long planned by SCWA.This is illegal.I understand, under SEQRA. SCWA told me personally,at the meeting with Congressman Bishop last week,that their intention when they purchased the Browns Hills system in 1997 was to bring in a pipeline and serve all of Orient. They told Governor Paterson,in their application for stimulus monies,that the pipeline would serve Brown Hills,houses along the road,and the need for water among all 700+Orient residents. 2. The Southold Town Board,listening to the residents of Orient,voted to reject a proposed amendment to the Town's Water Map and,therefore,to allowing SCWA to extend their pipeline into Orient,via Dam Pond and other sensitive areas. Southold Town's Attorney followed up this decision with a letter to SCWA's Office of the CEO stating very clearly that SCWA should let the Town complete its new Comprehensive Plan before attempting to move ahead.Furthermore,he stated that SCWA should demonstrate a clear desire on the part of Orient residents.To be filing for a new wetlands permit at this time seems entirely inappropriate and out of order. 3. James Gaughran,new Chairman of SCWA stated to me at last week's meeting with Congressman Bishop that SCWA has heard our objections and has no intention of forcing themselves into Orient against our wishes.The project has,therefore,become hypothetical—something that might happen in the future,as new CEO Jeff Szabo suggested in the Suffolk Times.We ask you to dismiss their application until the project is once again an active one. 4. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has clearly stated that they do not accept the concept of a "transmission" main. SCWA is using this concept to argue that they are simply connecting 2 parts of their current system and that,as such,they have no need to conduct a full environmental review,or to canvass the residents of Orient.This is disingenuous. If the SCDHS does not accept the notion of a transmission main, neither should the Southold Board of Trustees. I look forward to being with you on Wednesday at your hearing and strongly urge you to dismiss or reject SCWA's most recent application for a wetlands permit. Yours respectfully, Venetia Hands Browns Hills Resident and representative of the community in conversations with SCWA cc: Scott Russell,Supervisor of Southold Town Amal Chaudhuri,co-representative of Browns Hills in these talks Catherin Chaudhuri,President of Browns Hills Board members of Browns Hills All other members of Browns Hills 2 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: maryannlib85@aol.com Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 6:39 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: MAULetterToSoutholdTownTrustees Dear Ms. Standish, I am writing to you with the understanding that you will forward copies of my letter to Ms. Doherty and Messrs. King, Bergen, Ghosio, Jr.and Bredemeyer. Please deny the Suffolk County Water Authority's (SCWA) renewed effort to expand their operations to Orient by digging a pipeline via the Causeway across Dam Pond, under the guise of bringing water to our neighbors in Browns' Hills. SCWA's application to be considered by the Southold Town (ST) Board of Trustees on Wednesday, July 21 is segmented; it does not represent SCWA's stated plan to service 700+ households in Orient. Such segmentation is illegal under NYS SEQRA. Unlike SCWA's usual procedure, there has been no objective, third-party survey of Orient residents in their haste to dig such pipeline. SCWA should be directed by the ST Board of Trustees to, at the very least, wait'til ST's Comprehensive Plan is completed, as previously requested by the ST Board. SCWA stated last week, after it's meeting with Mr. Russell, two Browns' Hills residents and Rep.Bishop that the pipeline is"dead", that SCWA is requesting another permit in case Orient residents change their mind. Orient residents will never change their minds about a pipeline that has been forced upon them, and is designed to access the Lloyd Aquifer so that Orient's water can shipped to Western Suffolk County, where SCWA's limited water supply is compromised and, as evidenced last week, is already running out. We in Orient have been hard at work to stop SCWA's proposed pipeline for almost a year, at great cost in effort and legal fees. Please stop the madness imposed on us by Suffolk County Water Authority, which, in my opinion, is an out-of-control organization using thuggish tactics to impose its finance- driven will on the citizens of Orient. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerely, MaryAnn Liberatore p �;7 77 I cc: Ms. Jill Doherty Messrs. King Bergen 1 L! Ghosio, Jr. I Bredemeyer 7/20/2010 Standish, Lauren From: atdcom@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:10 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA application To Southold Town Trustees, As a resident of Orient, I respectfully ask you to dismiss the SCWA application. Congressman Bishop and the SCWA chairman have both confirmed that the pipeline project is dead; if so, why is the application still alive? The SCWA has not conformed to proper process. It has submitted segmented applications that are misleading and mistaken. There is no demonstrated demand in Orient. SCWA has not surveyed residents of Orient and shown that at least 40 per cent want to hook up. The application in any circumstance is premature, and SCWA has not taken into account the Southold Town Attorneys request to refrain from applying for permits until a comprehensive town plan is complete. There has been no adequate environmental assessment of the pipeline. This application is only worthy of being dismissed Yours sincerely, Anne Taylor Davis �1-} �((, L� ? 3940 Orchard Street i lu5 S � 5 Orient, New York 11957 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Mary Meeuws[mmeeuws@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:42 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] - Dismissal of Wetlands Permit Application -Message is from an unknown sender Attention Board of Trustee's Our water in Orient is excellent, we have had our water tested periodically. We are fully aware of our duty to preserve our water resources in Orient. --T_ 1/ Please insist on an unsegmented application L7 _ due to inaccuracy in the original application. 2/ Please do not process an application until SCWA does a objective 3rd party survey of Orient and establishes that 40%or resident want public water. ( —c- 3/Please tell SCWA to wait until Comprehensive Plan is complete and do not consider an application until these conditions are in place. 4/ Please dismiss the application. If our Congressman Bishop and the Chairman of SCWA have indicated that the pipeline project is dead, why consider the permit's application? Leo & Mary Meeuws 255 Hillcrest Mary Meeuws mmeeuws0.eaMhlink.net Why Wait? Move to Earthl-ink. 7/21/2010 Page 1 of 1 Subj: Water Fund Date: 7/21/2010 5:06:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time From: bdeluca(aeastendenvironment.oM To: Orientexoress414(a)aol.com Hi Bill: Thanks for your call. I appreciated having the chance to speak with you yesterday and more fully understand your situation regarding the Orient water main extension. I wanted to let you know that if you wish, I can see whether I can get the attention of some of the folks at the Suffolk County Health Department(where I worked for nearly a decade)to reexamine the contamination issues you shared with me yesterday. Just let me know and I will make a few calls. As promised, I have taken a look at the contributions to the Orient water fund. As of today, the fund has received 47 separate contributions from 45 separate donors. The total fund balance is$30,500. If the fund changes substantially, I can post you on its status. From one advocate to another, I wish you good luck in all your continued pursuits and I appreciate your taking the time to share you point of view with me. Best, Bob DeLuca Robert S. DeLuca, President Group for the East End P.O. Box 1792 Southold, NY 11971 ph. 631-765-6450 x-213 fx. 631-765-6455 www.eastendenvironment.org t JUL 2 2010 Sao[hold Toy+'n Board oS Trustees Wednesday, July 21, 2010 AOL: Orientexpress414 0A MAIO 7�',bl}a �iQe- �3 _ 7 4- A-)cE 0iujo y e �65ss bu JUL-21-2010 11:41 P.001/001 Sofia Antoniadis 12500 Main Road PO Box 413 East Marion, New York 11939 Jury 21, 2010 a1 - Southold iJ L; Board of Town Trustees !! Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route25 Sot,"! P.O. Box 1179 Fcartl of Trustees Southold, New York 11971 Re: Suffolk County Water Authority Dear Trustees. In response to the notice received regarding the hearing for the permitting of the installation of a water main in the roadbed of route 25,please accept this letter as a request for denial. At this time, I do not believe that this water service will benefit our community but in fact hurt it. Property owners should be able to continue to utilize well water and if needed install a filtration system on their well. There in no need for public water. I am against this Installation. Sincerely, 4adis Sofia ton TOTAL P.001 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: orientlinenco@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:31 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: From Orient resident re: Water Dear Ms Standish: I hope that you will forward my letter to Ms Doherty, Mr King, Mr Bergen, Mr Gosio, and Mr Bredermeyer. I have owned a home in Orient for over ten years and writing to you now, to ask that you not grant the SWCA a wet lands permit to drill in Orient. . The vast majority of Orient residents clearly do not want Public water. I have a well and prefer to keep it. If anyone in Orient is not happy with the quality of their water, there are ways to remedy the situation without granting the SCWA any further foot hold in Orient . WE DO NOT WANT THEM HERE and ask that you represent us and our desire, our right, to protect this very fragile environment, remaining farm land and existing aquifer. As an American citizen I do not understand how this water main can be forced upon us when the majority of the residents of Orient are not in favor of the water main. How can this happen? The SCWA has one goal, one objective-to sell as much water to as many people as possible. That is what they are in the business of doing. Once you hook up-your are hooked up forever. I find that outrageous-un American. Please help us to protect what is left of what we love. Sincerely, Janet Markarian I j r l� 1100 Village Lane L � =(r- Orient, NY 11957 f`l� !j L JU� U ^ 2010 sor. ro�a ro,; Fc2rn M Truster � 7/22/2010 Page I of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Kathleen McLinskey [ktmclinskey@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 4:29 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -Orient Water SCWA wetlands permit- Message is from an unknown sender Unfortunately we are unable to attend the SCWA Wetlands Permit meeting but would like the Southold Town Board to please, please listen to the voices of Orient residents objection to this application because it appears to be somewhat deceptive to what has been reported in the local papers about SCWA no longer pursuing water main installation on the East Marion/Orient causeway. It is especially alarming since SCWA has failed to demonstrate whether at least 40%of homeowners want to hook up to SCWA water. Another concern is the damage that could happen to affect the environmental ecosystem in the bay due to pressure breakage in the pipe line under the Dam Pond channel, especially since there have been about 200 broken pipes a year, especially during winter freezes according to former CEO Michael LoGrande. A particular concern is the quality of water and the forced hook-up in many instances, leaving residents unable to use their own wells. Please inform the board that we residents of Orient are asking for the truth from SCWA regarding their wetlands application. We urge the board to stand with all Southold residents and not be intimidated by SCWA and their "hidden agenda." Thank you. Sincerely, John and Kathleen McLinskey (Orient Residents) ZJ;b Fesrr' at 7ruste�s _� 7/22/2010 Page 1 of I Standish, Lauren From: tedwebbl@optonline.net Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 1:35 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: news@orientwater.info Subject: Orient Water Pipeline Re: Orient Water Dear Trustees, I have been told that the SCWA announced at the trustees meeting this week that they plan to start digging across the East Marion causeway a day or two after Labor Day". If this information is correct then I would submit to you that the issue of an Orient water main is no longer the main focus. It is the lack of credibility of the SCWA and their arrogance toward the town board, and us tax payers, when they announced that they would dig no matter what the town board decided; and then backed off an agreement with Tim Bishop not to dig. They have taken arrogance and disrespect to a new depth! I simply would not do business with an organization that cannot be trusted. Until a valid poll of the entire Orient community is conducted, and all permits have been properly executed, I would not even allow them to use our public bathrooms! Surely, I would not allow them to put a spade in the ground anywhere near Dam Pond! Ted Webb C F 7/23/2010 Standish Lauren From: orientsailor@gmail.com on behalf of EJ Camp [ej@ejcamp.com] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 10:04 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDERj-Att: SCWA-Message is from an unknown sender I demand my rights to be acknowledged as a resident of Orient, NY. I do not approve of the water pipeline proposed and feel I represent the feelings of the entire town. EJ Camp EJ Camp 917-838-4991 www.ejcampphoto.com www.ejcamp.com Donate to our Haiti Relief Project http://www.nydg.com/haiti Providing prosthetics to amputee victims of the Haiti earthquake. JUG �UIO �60110111Tce poo-d of Trustees 1 Page 1 of I Standish, Lauren From: Laura Weil [laura.weil@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:36 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] - I am opposed to Town Water-Message is from an unknown sender Dear Trustees: I own my home at 2760 Village Lane in Orient and I am opposed to bringing town water to Orient. I think more research should be done to understand the environmental impact of the drilling for the pipe and the Water Authority should be forced to prove its case to residents. Please start to preserve Orient's natural beauty by opposing this ill -conceived and poorly handled gambit to spend taxpayer funds on an unwanted and unneeded project. Respectfully, Laura A.Weil zoo L— Road of Trust=es 7/23/2010 Page I of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Laura Weil [laura.weil@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:14 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -Orient Town Water- Message is from an unknown sender Ms. Standish, After hearing that the fight to save Orient from unwanted town water was over, it is very disheartening to hear that it was a lie. As a resident of Orient, at 2760 Village Lane, I am very opp of sed lI JUL ,. ', �OiU L) -i-1 seI;;�,em ro�;:,,' Fnard of Trustees 7/23/2010 Standish Lauren From: Tom Stevenson iampell@optonline.net] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:49 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Orient Water Pipeline Dear Trustees of the Town of Southold, 2 am writing you as an Orient resident and concerned citizen about SCWA's attempt to obtain a permit from the Trustees to drill under Dam Pond. Besides for the fact that the vast majority of residents do not want SCWA's water main, we are also concerned about the environmental impact of digging in such a sensitive area as the Dam Pond and Causeway area. Runoff from construction will impact our vital wetlands and threaten the scallop seeding project that is under way in Orient Harbor. Please use the powers that you received when we, the citizenry, elected you to say NO to SCWA. Their permit application is incomplete and fails to unveil the full nature of the project. Again, please reject their application. Thank you. Sincerely, Tom Stevenson Oysterponds Farm Orient, NY ilD r? JU 2010 Soc;ha!d Torcr Pr,ard of Trustees 1 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Bmccaff@aol.com Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:11 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -SAWA water main -Message is from an unknown sender Well, surprises never end with the arrogant folks at SCWA. Following 10 days of unbased joy that the project was DEAD, we now learn that they are proceeding in the face of nearly nobody wanting them here in Orient. They have continued to be dishonest. What is strange is that there is absolutely no logic to spending $3,8 million for 28 homes. How about a theory that one only puts in a 12 inch main to supply water FROM Orient GOING WEST !!! There is no other logic. Has the Town asked for a meeting with the Board of the Authority?What happened to Tim Bishop's deal-- merely election year ploys ??Where is Ken Lavelle on this issue? I encourage the Board to take every available option to stop this intrusion in Orient. Our water is just fine thank you. Brian McCaffrey, P.E. King Street, Orient Ju _ goo Southold Tmmc Be3rd of Trustees 7/23/2010 Standish, Lauren From: ian ogilvie [89thstreet@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:03 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER]-Suffolk County Water Authority-Message is from an unknown sender I am a resident of Orient writing you to express my total opposition to the water main proposed to be built to Browns Hills. I am dismayed by the process involved, specifically the completely anti democratic runaround being performed by the SCWA. Please stop this project. sincerely, Ian Ogilvie 2100 Youngs Rd Orient NY (631) 323-3736 Sent via B1ackBerry by AT&T I I r,; 0, ,,f TAU; i Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: ks11957@aol.com Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 11:41 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA Permit Why would the town even entertain a request for a permit from SCWA? Could the death of the project be premature? What does the SCWA not understand about the majority voice of a village saying "we don't want your water"! Please DO NOT issue a permit to the SCWA. Sincerely, Kathy Smith 1725 Village La Orient, N.Y. 11957 G 7/23/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Richard J. Gillooly [gilloolya@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:17 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -water main - Message is from an unknown sender I am truly at a loss. Is this dead issue or have I been mislead. Yours Truly, Dick Richard J. Gillooly Gillooly Associates Real Estate Advisory Services Office: 201-689-9900 Mobile: 201-563-2555 Htt�://www.GlloolvAssociates.com 7/23/2010 Standish, Lauren From: James Branigan Ub@omegarm.comj Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:27 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA-Orient Project Southold Board of Trustees, The action of the SCWA to continue with the system extension to Browns Hills after strong and overwhelming opposition by Orient residents is outrageous. They are saying to Town officials and Lawmakers as well as residents; we do not care what you want or if you say we cannot build, we will build the new main anyway. Their drilling a well to Lloyd Sand hundreds of feet deep will likely deplete our surface well aquifers, and they say we can because we are the SCWA. similar to the Port Authority on NY & NJ they do not appear to answer to anyone not you, the tax payers, citizens or law makers. They will pump our aquifers dry for the benefit of their finances and system wide need to find new water for Suffolk County. They will stand behind Suffolk County health department laws to make us, the tax paying residents of this Town, spend allot of money to hook up and use the water from their system. The cost will far exceed the cost of maintaining my own well and filtration system which delivers better quality water (according to the Suffolk County Department of Health who tests my water periodically) than is available from a public water system who's water is full of chemicals such and chlorine, fluoride and calgone, not to mention iron and bacteria from their piping system. If this is allowed to go through against the wishes of nearly everyone except the SCWA it is just one more step toward a Socialist State where what happens is dictated by few to the determent of many. We pay the bills, you must act boldly to stop this injustice. This is still The United States of America! Act Boldly NOW! Best Regards, James & Bette Branigan I�Ia,, ttt InI I James & Bette Branigan 1245 old Farm Road Orient, NY 11957 631 323 2450 E Mail: JB@OmegaRM.com Ccc?nola icrL. __ ..� e�::-d at Trc�lees i Standish Lauren From: ronacoml3@optonline.net Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 11:18 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: message to Trustees Hi, My name is Rona Smith. My husband Barry and I live in orient. We have intentionally been publicly silent about the water pipeline because of the intense acrimony of the situation. We certainly do not want to raise the temperature of the argument. In fact we thought the debate was over and we had completely lost the possibility of public water for Orient. Maybe it isn't over and we should state our thoughts. We favor the water pipeline for a number of reasons. Firstly, we dislike half-truths and scare tactics. At the outset of the public water controversy we were told it "was a fact" that public water would cause all farm acreage to be redeveloped into quarter-acre lots, resulting in destruction of Orient with hundreds of new residents and a loss of the pristine beauty we all love. More recently, the use of chlorine in public water was proof that the SCWA would be introducing a "known carcinogen" in our otherwise perfect water. However, the use of highly dilute chlorine in public water systems is a universal standard. NYC's water system has chlorine as an additive to protect the public from some of the dangerous substances occuring in water supplies. Another frequently mentioned idea is that SCWA is "stealing" our water to give to others! When did sharing become out of style? In addition, running pipes beneath bodies of water has not had any negative effect as far as we know and is widely accepted as a non-event from an environmental standpoint. But worst of all, in all this screaming, has been the lack of reasoned dialogue with an opportunity for all points of view to be considered. We mostly don't want Southold Town to succumb to the kind of bully tactics that seem to be taking the place of reasoned discourse. We have heard quiet stories of wells in Orient that have salt water intrusion. If this is true, shouldn't we try to provide viable drinking water to these households? Sincerely, Rona Smith F., Page 1 of 2 Standish, Lauren — a From: Linda Apostle[lapostle@hotmail.com] y Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 1:31 PM II To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -To all Southold town trustees-Message is from an unknown sender Trustees: Regarding the proposed SCWA water line to Brown's Hills, Orient: It is with great dismay that I have followed the proceedings regarding the above proposal. Dismay because of the many untruths perpetrated by the SCWA, whose new CEO was recently quoted as saying they will not proceed with the pipeline because Orient residents DO NOT WANT IT! Furthermore, Cong. Tim Bishop's website states the following: BISHOP, SCWA AGREE TO HALT BROWNS HILLS PROJECT 05/03/10 Proposal would Halt Project, Water Authority will Work to Transfer Responsibility for Providing Clean Water to Southold Town Orient, NY—Congressman Tim Bishop announced that as a result of discussions last week and over the weekend with the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) that a proposed project for the Browns Hills section of Orient has been put on hold and the SCWA will work with the Town of Southold to take over responsibility for providing clean water to the area. Congressman Bishop called Southold Town Supervisor Scott Russell to inform him of the development this morning. However, at the latest town meeting July 21, the SCWA announced that they will begin work on the pipeline to Browns Hills two days after Labor Day!!!! The people of Orient have spoken, clearly, that they do not want the SCWA involved in their water systems. The residents of Browns Hills currently use filters for their water and are totally satisifed with its cleanliness. The few Orient residents who have contaminated water can use the same method to clean their water, for much less cost that the $4M that SWCA says the pipeline will cost. As an Orient resident, I, too, use well water, which has been tested and is perfectly healthy for my family and two young grandchildren. This is the case with the majority of residents. We DO NOT, as the SCWA says on its website, have the worst water on the North Fork!! If the great majority of residents do not the SCWA, why do they persist in wanting to build the pipeline. Is it to get the $4M US govt. funds on their profit statement, and to show they are growing, rather than the actual case which is that their funds are diminishing? It is a documented fact that SCWA will not be able to provide water any cleaner than that which 7/26/2010 Page 2 of 2 the majority of our residents all have from private wells. Also, SCWA must add chlorine to the water they provide to clean it. Chlorine is a known carcinagen when combined with certain other chemicals. MUST WE???????????????????????????????????????????? Please use your utmost due discretion when deciding this crucial issue via the wetlands permit request of SCWA. Thank you for your consideration, Linda Apostle 24850 Main Road Orient, NY The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. Get bus - 7/26/2010 3180 Orchard Street r r Orient,New Yorkr— July 24, 2010 I " JUL To:The Southold Town Trustees so.ar�!d Tc�n Dear Trustees, --- I will take the opportunity to address in writing some of the points I had tried to make on Wednesday. Our attorney, Chris Murray,referenced two specific clauses in the Town code, one requiring start and finish dates of the project, and the other requiring that the Board address the issue of the safety, health and welfare of the community. While Mr. Hopkins contributed start and stop dates which might or might not be real, the second issue was not addressed at all. The application is incomplete. Moreover, the application referenced an EAF which was prepared by the Southold Town consultants for the amendment to the law, which was ultimately voted down, and not for the project itself. However, in the narrative with the EAF,the consultants assume the eventual extension of the main to Orient Point, and evaluate the possible impacts. It is clear that this is a segmented application, illegal under SEQRA. In evidence, we have the following documents and references: The Board of SCWA adopted a resolution on April 26 to amortize the cost of the main extension among the 772 homes in Orient. A Department of Health document insists that SCWA provide service as far as Orient Point. The application for stimulus funds references all 774 homes. The Governor's letter listing the award of funds references all 774 homes. The consultants' narrative posits the possible addition of 187 to 198 homes if the main extends to Orient Point; that represents a significant increase of density of approximately 25%. Although the consultants recognize the probability of the extension of the main to Orient Point, their EAF pretends it will stop at Brown's Hills. Specifically, on page 19 of the consultants' EAF, the following should be reflected,whether the main were to go as far as Brown's Hills or the Point: The application is in conflict with official goals. Southold Town has been actively pursuing the preservation of farmland and open space. There would be a significant change in density of land use. There would be an increased demand for community service. • And there certainly is community opposition. There would also be a significant increase in traffic, congesting a road already subjected to Cross Sound Ferry traffic. Given these probable outcomes, Suffolk County Water Authority should be required to submit an unsegmented application and to prepare a full Environmental Impact Statement as per a SEQRA Type I designation, as recommended by the Conservation Advisory Council. Sincerely, Fredrica Wachsberger President, Southold Citizens for Safe Roads Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: David P. Moore[dmoore3@optonline.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:11 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Tim Kelly Subject: Orient Water Dear Southold Town Trustees, As a year-round resident of the Main Road (in Orient) since 1968, 1 believe that a water main would be a good thing for the people of Orient. In fact, it would be about the only beneficial project that has come down the road as long as I have lived here. The true support for these projects comes from the people who sign up when they see the project underway.Until the hole is being dug, all the talk and posturing is meaningless (look at this project going back to April,2009!) So, I encourage you to approve the SCWA application to allow for placing a public water main from East Marion to Orient. "Orient' should be whereever there are people who need a reliable supply of clean water. Anyone who chooses not to take part is free to decline. Unfortunately, previous"public" hearings on this subject were followed by private meetings of a select group with a politician or two. After the private meetings, broad statements were made to the press about the demise of the project. I was never assured that both sides were equally represented at the"private" meetings. I encourage the Trustees to consider the welfare of the people who may want/need public water. Those opposed to it have made their ideas very clear to all. Thank you, David P. Moore 24805 Main Rd. Orient,N.Y. 11957 i I 7/27/2010 July 24, 2010 Jill Doherty, President James King,Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio,Jr. John Bredemeyer VIA EMAIL Dear Southold Trustees, Like many other Orient residents, I attended Wednesday's Trustees meeting hoping to speak. It was a great disappointment that the SCWA application—so important to everyone in Southold Town—was at the end of the agenda. Standing out in the hall before the meeting, a neighbor who is in his eighties said, "There's something about going over that causeway. It doesn't matter what season of the year or if you've been there 10,000 times before." The group of us standing there smiled and nodded because we all know what a fragile and remarkable place the causeway is. Nothing has united the citizens of Orient like this struggle between SCWA and the common people. No matter whether your family has lived here for six generations or you just arrived five years ago,we all stand united (but for a very small minority) in resistance to "improvements" that are unnecessary and will negatively affect our quality of fife. Before the Trustees is a proposal to drill a water line across the Orient/ East Marion Causeway. This fragile barrier is unlikely to survive the next hurricane, leaving Orient with potentially no water at all. Scallop and oyster beds are just beginning to be re-established alongside the causeway. And all of Suffolk County enjoys the state park at the far end of Orient, accessible only by the causeway. For the Trustees to approve this end run around a project (the SCWA pipeline) that all parties have agreed to cease action on, is a dereliction of your duty to protect our wetlands against unnecessary intrusion and damage. A strong message from the Trustees to place the ecosystem ahead of corporate greed is what Southold Town most needs now. We trust that you will recognize your duties to all of Southold Town and will vote "No" on this application at your August meeting. Sincerely, Sherry Thomas PO Box 543 JUL 2 7 Orient NY 11957 Sntho'!d Tc'r:: Board o1 Trus!-,, P.O. Box 116 Orient, NY, 11957 July 17, 2010 � Southold Town Trustees, Southold Town Hall I JUL Z 7 2010 1' P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY, 11971 Southold Town Board of Trustees Dear Trustees: We learned at the July 21 meeting that you are still open to comments regarding the SCWA's application to lay a water pipeline to the Browns Hill section of Orient. Please, therefore, add our comments to those expressed at the meeting by opponents of the SCWA application. My husband and I have owned a home in Orient for the past 18 years. We have our own water well, which we pay to have tested regularly by the Suffolk County Health Department. All previous tests have shown no contamination of any sort. However, at our most recent testing within the past year, results indicated that the nitrates exceeded optimum levels. We questioned the reading, and asked the health department if we should have the water retested by a private agency of our own choosing. The Suffolk Health Dept said they would instead come out and take a new water sample. They did that and it was determined that the nitrate level did NOT exceed optimum levels. We were subsequently surprised to learn that an overly high level of nitrates is being cited by the SCWA as one of the reasons Orient needs public water. Our personal experience would seem to bring into question the testing methodology used throughout the community. . The SCWA proposal is to spend a significant amount of federal stimulus money on the pipeline. It is quite obvious as a result of public hearings and meetings that the great majority of residents of Orient DO NOT want the SCWA to bring public water to our area. Is there not a better place to spend these funds? Does not the current budget crisis in the State of New York cry out for more funds to be spent on areas such as unemployment counseling, creation of more jobs, education...the list is seemingly endless. Why waste the money on something wherein the supposed recipients of this largesse are strongly against receiving it? While we have heard that the SCWA application did not adequately fill in all the legal nooks and crannies, we do not really feel that is strong enough reason to deny the application, as some of the our fellow opponents suggest. However, we do strongly suggest that simple common sense is far and away enough reason for the Trustees to deny the SCWA request. Forget the legalese, rely instead on your own good sense. Sincerely yours, Ellen and Paul Mitchell Dear Miss Standish............... Please distribute the enclosed letter to all members of the Southold Town Trustees. Thank you............... - it Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Janice Robinson Brobinson@timesreview.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 3:03 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: regarding orient water hello my trustees, i want to express my hearty NO on the possibility of the water authority coming to orient. those of us who have been long time residents (for me, since 1971)have been very happy with our current wells. we dont need the additional expense and disruption. i am sure my neighbors agree, and i will share this email address with them. thanks for keeping us free of SCWA. janice robinson ---------_ 670 cedar brich lane, orient point � i Janice Robinson Senior Advertising Account Executive Times/Review Newspapers L-�'— ? PO Box 1500 Mattituck N.Y. 11952 631-354-8034 (o) 631-298-0410 (t) ri obinson@timesreview.com 7/28/2010 DANIEL C. WATTS 605 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 (917)586-9637 dwatts@echalk.com July 27,2010 Jill Doherty President Southold Board of Trustees 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 F-=�— Dear Mrs. Doherty, I write in regard to agenda item#16 of the July 21, 2010 Board Meeting. The item read: 16. SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY requests a Wetland Permit for the installation of a water transmission main in road bed of Route 25. Located:Route 25, East Marion to Browns Hill Rd., Orient I strongly oppose the granting of this Wetland Permit,for the following reasons: The pipeline is not necessary. 1. My wife and I have just conducted extensive testing of the water at our house on Village Lane and found NO contaminants exceeding EPA standards. My parents tested their house on Harbor River Road and found NO contaminants exceeding EPA standards. I believe that almost all of the houses in Orient have perfectly potable water. 2. For those few isolated houses that do have water issues,the town can and should provide effective(and much less expensive)filtering. The pipeline will provide leverage for further and more dense development in Orient., 1. Development always follows water eventually,despite the best intentions of those that set zoning regulations. The vast majority of residents do not want public water in Orient. I believe that you have the interests of the people of Orient Hamlet at heart and I trust that you will NOT grant permission for this water main. With warm regards, Daniel Watts 3180 Orchard Street Orient,New York July 24, 2010 To:The Southold Town Trustees Dear Trustees, — I will take the opportunity to address in writing some of the points I had tried to make on Wednesday. Our attorney, Chris Murray,referenced two specific clauses in the Town code, one requiring start and finish dates of the project, and the other requiring that the Board address the issue of the safety,health and welfare of the community. While Mr. Hopkins contributed start and stop dates which might or might not be real, the second issue was not addressed at all. The application is incomplete. Moreover, the application referenced an EAF which was prepared by the Southold Town consultants for the amendment to the law,which was ultimately voted down, and not for the project itself. However, in the narrative with the EAF,the consultants assume the eventual extension of the main to Orient Point, and evaluate the possible impacts. It is clear that this is a segmented application, illegal under SEQRA. In evidence, we have the following documents and references: The Board of SCWA adopted a resolution on April 26 to amortize the cost of the main extension among the 772 homes in Orient. A Department of Health document insists that SCWA provide service as far as Orient Point. The application for stimulus funds references all 774 homes. The Governor's letter listing the award of funds references all 774 homes. The consultants' narrative posits the possible addition of 187 to 198 homes if the main extends to Orient Point; that represents a significant increase of density of approximately 25%. Although the consultants recognize the probability of the extension of the main to Orient Point,their EAF pretends it will stop at Brown's Hills. Specifically, on page 19 of the consultants' EAF,the following should be reflected, whether the main were to go as far as Brown's Hills or the Point: The application is in conflict with official goals. Southold Town has been actively pursuing the preservation of farmland and open space. There would be a significant change in density of land use. There would be an increased demand for community service. And there certainly is community opposition. There would also be a significant increase in traffic, congesting a road already subjected to Cross Sound Ferry traffic. Given these probable outcomes, Suffolk County Water Authority should be required to submit an unsegmented application and to prepare a full Environmental Impact Statement as per a SEQRA Type I designation, as recommended by the Conservation Advisory Council. Sincerely, v C,� M� �'�-- Fredrica Wachsberger President, Southold Citizens for Safe Roads Standish, Lauren From: Catherine Chaudhuri [catherine@chaudhuri.com) Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:44 AM To: Standish, Lauren l Subject: Lauren - Please distribute to all Trustees-Thank you. r Dear Trustees: - I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway —under and through wetlands. The question is not: Will there be a hurricane? But: when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95k of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents -- to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation" is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to 1 Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point, throughout the village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50 - 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more development in Orient - at denser levels than current zoning permits. That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 orient residents out of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a "80%- majority" are disingenuous at best. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (Of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, 2 at almost every turn. we request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Catherine Chaudhuri 7/29/2010 3 Page 1 of 3 Standish, Lauren From: Carol Taylor[lujaz2@optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:05 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: for distribution to Southold Town Trustees i L + ;l l Dear Trustees: -- I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine)upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh) puffing the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer,and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE 7/29/2010 Page 2 of 3 PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J.ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know,SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal,and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50— 100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no,despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route,only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS 7/29/2010 Page 3 of 3 Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme,and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. signed:Carol Lee Taylor July 29,2010 7/29/2010 Standish, Lauren From: Betty Satterwhite[BASatterwhite@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:39 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER]-Orient water-Message is from an unknown sender Dear Ms. Standish: I am a resident of Orient, and live on Narrow River Road. I strongly oppose the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line from East Marion to Browns Hills; I urge you to reject this permit. Betty A. Satterwhite PO BOX 121 Orient, NY 11957 July 29, 2010 I i �L d i Page 1 of 3 N Standish, Lauren From: EBONGARTZ@aol.com Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:46 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov -- Subject: wetlands permit DATE: July 29, 2010 TO: Southold Town Trustees FROM: Eric C. Bongartz Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think:fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries,etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer,a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. 7/29/2010 Page 2 of 3 Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J.ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know,SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50— 100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we ran find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. 7/29/2010 Page 3 of 3 D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, Slate and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA,as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Eric C. Bongartz 1205 Greenway East P.O. Box 113 Orient, NY 11957 631-323-0001 7/29/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Coco Kim [coco@cocokim.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:50 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott Subject: [NEWSENDER] -SCWA Issue -Message is from an unknown sender Dear Trustees: As a resident of Orient, I beseech you to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills.The SWCA has repeatedly demonstrated alarming disregard for the legal, environmental and ethical issues related to putting in this pipeline. I do not need to reiterate the myriad reasons that a pipeline is unnecessary and unwanted,as our hamlet has made this clear in countless prior missives and public fora. i respectfully request that the Trustees evaluate carefully the actions and arguments of the SCWA.It is clear that the only beneficiary of a pipeline is the SWCA.We trust that you have our interests in mind,not theirs. Thank you. Coco Kim Schetman 38910 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 July 29, 2010 I. _I i 7/29/2010 Helen M. Proud 2395 Main Road POB 546, Orient NY 11957 631-323-3523 July 27, 2010 Southold Town Hall Attn: Lauren Standish, Trustees Assistant POB 1179 Southold NY 11971 Dear Ms. Standish, Please convey to the trustees of Southold Town that I am in favor of the Suffolk County Water Authority's plan for a pipe line to Browns Hills. In my opinion I would personally benefit form having SCWA water available to my residence. I believe that this effort is for betterment of the health, safety, and well-being of the community. Sincerely yours, 1 cc. Supervisor Russell, - c Set 1'1,ld 1 En;A ni Trustees _-_.1 Standish, Lauren From: Jane Smith pansmith@optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:49 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com Subject: Orient water July 28, 2010 To the trustees: The following letter states, far more articulately than I could hope to, the case against SCWA. it is clear that SCWA has something huge to gain from this project, and that Orient has only much to lose. Please refuse it appll-ca�ion and help protect your constituency. Thank you Jane Smith 1750 Platt Rd Orient ',.._ .. i Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and lea �n -r�etect 'the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway under and through wetlands. The question is not: Will there be a hurricane? But: when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95t of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents -- to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. 1 Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to orient Point, throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50 - 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more development in orient - at denser levels than current zoning permits. That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Forks leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a 1180% majority" are disingenuous at best. 2 D. THE PRO►'ECT"DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. 3 Standish, Lauren From: Clyde Wachsberger[skip0345@gmail.com1 Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 12:18 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.info; Marc@marcalessi.com Subject: [NEWSENDER]- SCWA Application - Message is from an unknown sender Dear Southold Town Trustees, I am baffled and concerned and dismayed that the SCWA Application for a wetlands permit was not immediately denied. It seems clear that representatives of SCWA have lied outright about every issue since this project was first proposed. They have improperly filed applications, they have left important information off applications, they have falsely claimed statistics in their favor, and they have given public statements that they later reversed. Given this history of untrustworthiness, how can any of you believe anything they say now? How can any of you trust that what they propose now to do is what they will in fact do? How can you trust or believe that what is written on the application is true? The larger issue here is what SCWA will actually do once it gets its pipeline into Orient. There are reports that SCWA is running out of water and wants to tap into the aquifer deep under Orient, to take Orient's water and deliver it elsewhere. Have any of you investigated these reports? You must, before you consider this application. Orient is united in its opposition to SCWA bringing its pipeline into our community, while there are other communities that are begging for it. Doesn't this fact alone show that something is wrong here? why is SCWA determined to come into a community that does not want them, and why does it refuse to help a community that does want them? You must investigate this too, before you consider this application. Being Trustees does not mean that you must blindly trust an organization that has proven itself to be wholly untrustworthy. Look to the future of Orient and Southold town, and stand firm against SCWA's bullying! Sincerely, Clyde Wachsberger 295 Village Lane Orient, New York 11957 631 323 3976 1 Standish, Lauren From: Walter Millis[wmillis@optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:59 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Cong. Tim Bishop c/o; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; marc@marcalessi.com; ed@edromaine.com; Russell, Scott, tkelly@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.info Subject: ORIENT WATER TO: Southold Town Trustees FROM: Walter & Alison Millis we are permanent, taxpaying residents of orient and are strongly opposed to granting the SCWA permission to tear up the entrance to Dam Pond to install a water pipeline, which is apparently both unwanted and unneeded at this time. We share the objections voiced in the Orient Water News but will not take up space copying it here as you have it already. Beyond that, the SCWA has behaved in such a duplicitous manner that one evidently cannot trust them to do what they say they want to do. we hope you counted your fingers after shaking hands with them! Sincerely, Alison Millis Walter Millis 1800 Village Lane Orient 1 Standish, Lauren From: Clyde Wachsberger[skip0345@gmail.com) Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 4:59 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov, lavalle@senate.stal1e.ny.a9;Marc@,marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesrgview.com;info&wientwater.info Subject: [NEWSENDER] -To the Southold Town Trustees: OrlentWaTerNfat We-frands`FIB mit Application -Message is from an unknown sender Dear Members of the Southold Town Trustees, As a long time resident of Orient, living at 295 Village Lane, I am writing to oppose the application by the SCWA for a wetlands permit to install a pipeline from East Marion to Brown's Hills. I know of no issue that has so united the citizens of Orient. Folks out here are overwhelming opposed to this ill-conceived plan. I attended your recent hearing on this issue, and I came away discouraged by its tone. Most worrisome was your attorney, Lori Hulse, stating that you, the board, could approve the application even if it was not filed in accordance with the laws. But even if the SCWA had filed a tight and legal application, which many believe they did not, you still would not be required to approve it IF such approval would result in damage to the quality of the wetlands and the health, welfare, and general safety of the community. It is for these reasons that I urge you to vote against granting the permit. Many issues before you are of relatively small scope--"Can a few more feet be added to the dock?", "Can we cut some more phragmite?", "Can we reconstruct the retaining wall?"--but this application is of a different order, with the potential to damage the wetlands of Orient and the rural nature of our community forever. By focusing on the small issue of laying the pipe in the roadbed, which might or might not hurt the wetlands, you will be avoiding the larger issue of what damage will result to the wetlands over the years AS A RESULT OF THE PIPE? Once Orient is opened to the big developments that the piped water will encourage, the last vestige of rural Long Island will be forever lost. And all of that new construction and the resulting larger population will stress the wetlands. This has the potential to be the most critical wetlands' protection vote you will ever cast. Now is the time to say enough is enough. And this is not just to benefit Orient and the natural world that exists there--many people come from the city and down island to Southold to enjoy, admire, and appreciate the beautiful wetlands of the East End. When things finally are as built up here as they are in Nassau County, there will be no reason for tourists to visit our beautiful world. They might as well go to Jones Beach, saving money and gas. And when that happens, all of Southold Town will suffer economically. Our economies need the tourist dollars which are attracted to our pristine environment, our environment that sets Southold apart. You men and women, as our representatives, have the power to say no to this application. At the recent meeting, several permits were altered or denied because one or more of you felt uncomfortable. "I would be more comfortable if the fragmite were cut by land" "I would be more comfortable if the septic system were moved several feet. " I urge you, as you to consider this application, to think into the future and to ask yourself just how comfortable you will be knowing that your approval of this flawed application resulted in irreparable damage to the wetlands and the way of life of Southold Town. Please take into count that the citizens of Orient do not want the SCWA's intrusion, that The Southold Town Board is against this project, and that Congressmen Tim Bishop has brokered a moratorium. Please, as our representatives, speak with one voice with these others and vote to deny this permit. Most sincerely, Charles Dean 295 Village Lane 1 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: wjstrohmeyer@optonline.net Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:50 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: ion.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com Subject: Request of Trustees by SCWA for wetlands permit Waller,/. Sh-oluvcycr,Ji: 1850 Youngs Road Bar 20'6 Onent,New Ywk 1 1 9 5 7--020'6 (631)323-2466 July 29,2010 To: Southold Town Trustees Jill Doherty, President James King,Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio,Jr. John Bredemeyer Dear Trustees: You kept us waiting almost three hours while you plowed through case after case before ours many of which"you concur you have no jurisdiction"because the water(bay,inlet,swamp)is over 100' away. Setting aside the rude and abrupt way you and your attorney handled all speakers, I must ask what I believe to be a key question,"Where is your jurisdiction in this matter?" The distance from Dam Pond bridge to Browns Hills Road is 2.8 miles and I have divided it into segments for discussion: Southold Town Trustees' Jurisdiction a) The first 0.8 mile,bridge to Truman's Beach Yes b) The next 0.4 mile,Truman's Beach to Orient sign No (Truman's Beach Park Trustees jurisdiction) c) The next 0.2 mile,Orient sign to Latham's Farm Stand (within 100' of some form of wetland?) d) The next 1.4 miles, Farm Stand to Browns Hills Road No (the water ranges from over 100 yards to''/2 mile away) Hence,you might arguably have jurisdiction because the water is less than 100' away for the first 0.8 mile,but from there on you clearly have no jurisdiction. Hence all you have to do is withdraw your first permit as it was in error—it exceeded your responsibilities and tell the SCWA you cannot grant what is not in your purview as to the second and current request,"Application by Suffolk County Water Authority for a wetlands permit to lay a 12"pipeline from East Marion to the Browns Hills Road". In passing,it should be noted their request for a pipeline at no time indicates the direction of flow of the water! If this is truly a pipeline to bring water to Browns Hills,then it is imperative that there be a restriction that the water may flow only in an easterly direction. Further,as has been previously discussed, it is illegal for your board to hear a segmented request and to grant a segmented approval! Walter J. Strohmeyer,Jr. 7/30/2010 Pagel of 3 Standish, Lauren From: Priscilla Bull. [priscillabull@gmail.com] on behalf of Priscilla Bull [mabull@optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 6:29 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; tkelly@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.info Subject: for distribution to the Southold Town Trustees Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffol COL`hly Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmsion line_Froin _ East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands. The question is not: Will there be a hurricane? But: when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like 7/30/2010 Page 2 of 3 chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95% of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point, throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50— 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits. That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. 7/30/2010 Page 3 of 3 C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a "80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Priscilla Bull July 28, 2010 7/30/2010 Page 1 of 3 N Standish, Lauren From: marthawatts [marthawatts@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:07 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schenider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.info Subject: Against proposed public water main to Orient, New York Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From -- -- East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think:fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a"bubble'of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine)upsets this balance, raises the water table,and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh)putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer,and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents—to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. 7/30/2010 Page 2 of 3 Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J.ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient,and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no,despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route,only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM 7/30/2010 Page 3 of 3 E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant,erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-eamed tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Martha Watts 295 Harbor River Road Orient, NY July 29, 2010 7/30/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: marthawatts[marthawatts@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:52 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: news@orientwater.info Subject: Orient water proposal To: Southold Town Trustees Jill Doherty, President James King, Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. John Bredemeyer Dear Trustees: I have been coming to Orient since 1971 and have been a property owner there since 1993 (295 Harbor River Road). We have never had any problems with our water, in terms of quality or supply. We are very apprehensive about the proposed bringing of public water to Orient via a pipeline. Please dismiss the wetlands permit application filed with Southold Town by SWCA. If you do not dismiss it, at least please insist upon: a. an unsegmented application; b. preceding the application with an objective survey of the desires of Orient residents re public water; and c. waiting until the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan is complete. d. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Martha Watts 7/30/2010 R Sandra Pawson Sinclair 29827 Main Road L P.O. Box 489 L-..-- - Orient, NY 11957 F_:_- 631 323 8040 917 797 4935 July 25, 2010 The Southold Town Board of Trustees Jill Dougherty, Pres., James King, VP, David Bergen, Bob Ghosio Jr., John Bredemeyer 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Suffolk County Water Authority=s Request for a Wetlands Permit Dear Members of the Southold Town Board of Trustees, You are about to make a decision that will directly affect my life and that of my friends and neighbors in Orient re the above referenced request for a wetlands permit by the SCWA. Your decision also has wider repercussions for Southold Town and for the entire North Fork. It will tell us how our government works. We're about to see. While I am not a tea party participant, I understand and sympathize with the general dissatisfaction for government that many Americans have come to feel. Decisions affecting our lives come at us from organs of government in the forms of mandates from both federal and state governments that increase our local taxes; quasi-public private corporations that really exist for the benefit of their shareholders and well paid employees make decisions which can be costly or upend our lives, among them, LIPA, now National Grid, the M.T.A., and of course SCWA. There are more than a thousand of these authorities, many carrying debt and responsibilities offloaded by the N.Y. State Legislature. I attended the recent meeting at Town Hall held on Wednesday, July 21s, and was impressed by the amount of work you accomplished that evening. (I was not at all impressed with your attorney.) 2. So here we are, the tiny hamlet of Orient up against the SCWA and your vote, should you grant SCWA=s request, will contravene.... 1. The Southold Town Board=s request that SCWA follow its usual procedure to get at least 40% of an area=s support before extending its pipeline. By now you should be well aware of the pitiable numbers of positive replies their questionnaire brought them. 2. The numbers of Orient citizens from all walks of life who are against this permit. 3. Real concerns of a substantive nature about placing a pipe under Dam Pond. Pipes are known to leak and break. Rule 275. 12 4. This one really grates me. While SCWA was applying for permits to build its so- called transmission line to Browns Hills, AT THE VERY SAME TIME, it was applying for stimulus money to bring water TO OVER 700 HOUSEHOLDS IN ORIENT. Who=s kidding whom? Are people who live far from Main Rd going to pay over$3,000 in hookup fees, plus the cost of piping the water to their houses at$25 to $30 per foot, plus maintenance etc. when they can go out and buy home systems for far less that deliver water that is better than that which would be piped in by SCWA! In the first place, this is segmentation and it is against the law. I am counting on the hope that common sense has not completely deserted the elected Board of Trustees! How dare SCWA apply to you for one type of permit and apply for federal monies of almost$3,000,000.00 dollars at the same time, an egregious amount considering the number of households that have expressed interest. Maybe they=re not doing very well. Sincerely, Sandra Pawson Sinclair cc: Southold Town Board Orient Water News Page 1 of 3 Standish, Lauren From: ralphcaselnova@optonline.net Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:31 PM To: Standish, Lauren Also, Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor,will be coming to Orient this Sunday at 1PM, at Poquatuck Hall. More details to follow. Unsubscribe P; �— --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i.l To: Lauren_.standish@town.southold.ny.us For distribution to the Southold Town Trustees Jon Schneider@mail.house.aoy For distribution to Congressman Tim Bishop Kenneth LaValle: Iavalle@senate.state.ny.us Marc Alessi: Marc@marcalessi.com Ed Romaine:Ed@-EdRomaine.com Scott Russell: Scott.Russell@town.a0uthold.nv usus Tim Kelly:tkelly@timesrewew.com Your neighbors in Orient: info@orientwa_te_r.info Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills,as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, 7/29/2010 Page 2 of 3 SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think:fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer,a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table,and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh)putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer,and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village,our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient,and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point, throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no,despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, 7/29/2010 Page 3 of 3 as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route,only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly,close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant,erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served,and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Ralph Caselnova, M.D. Orient, NY 11957 July 29, 2010 7/29/2010 Standish, Lauren From: Jeanne Markel Dm.markel@gmail.com]on behalf of Jeanne Markel Deanne.markel@verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:50 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: DENY SCWA APPLICATION Dear Ms. Standish, Below please find a letter composed by a group of concerned Orient citizens. I am in complete agreement with them on every count. Please act to deny the Suffolk County Water Authority's wetlands permit application. Thank you. - Sincerely, i Jeanne Markel Orient, NY � t Dear Trustee: I believe it is your civic and 1 duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway - under and through wetlands. The question is not: will there be a hurricane? But: when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95W of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents -- to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road 1 after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point, throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50 - 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more development in Orient - at denser levels than current zoning permits. That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a 1180% majority" are disingenuous at best. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) OTHER COMMENTS 2 . ......_.. Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, BCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. 3 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: jfried172@aol.com Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:35 AM To: Russell, Scott Cc: Standish, Lauren, Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@Romaine.com; tkelly@timesreview.com Subject: [NEWSENDER] -SCWA PLAN TO BRING WATER TO BROWNS HILL -Message is from an unknown sender Dear Trustees, As a homeowner on Dam Pond I am dismayed and amazed at how this entire episode/process has transpired with regard to SCWA bringing their pipeline to Browns Hill. Instead of describing in detail(which you have been made fully aware of)why this is so wrong and against everything we all truly hope for in our community I will simply ask you to please consider your duty to preserve and protect our wetlands and way of life and stop SCWA from proceeding. Thank you, Judith and Paul Fried I J ' L' 7/29/2010 Anne S. Hopkins 380 Platt Road/P.O.Box 82 _ Orient, NY 11957 Jill Doherty, President, Southold Town Board of Trustees James King, Vice-President Dave Bergen' Bob Ghosio, Jr. John Bredemeyer July 29, 2010 Dear President Doherty and Trustees, This letter is in reference to the application of the Suffolk County Water Authority for a Wetland Permit for the installation of what they are calling a "transmission main"on Route 25 from East Marion to Brown's Hill Road, Orient. I am writing to request that you reject this application on several grounds. 1. The Board of Trustees should follow the lead of the Southold Town Board, which has rejected a proposed amendment to the town water map allowing SCWA to extend their pipeline into Orient. Most residents of Orient believe that SCWA should wait until the town completes its new Comprehensive Plan before proceeding with this pipeline 2. The Wetland Permit sought by SCWA is for drilling under Dam Pond, just one segment of the total project. The entire project, which would pass through wetlands, a historic district and along a scenic byway, should be subject to a full SEQRA review. 3. Although SCWA refers to this project as a "transmission main" to serve only Brown's Hills and homeowners along the Main Road route to Brown's Hills, the record shows that SCWA wants to use this pipeline as a way to bringg public water to all of Orient. Therefore, before they are permitted to drill, according to SCWA's own regulations, they should survey all residents and proceed only if at least 40% of us agree to hook up. Because my house is less than 500 feet from Main Road, I did receive the flawed survey SCWA sent out to homeowners along the proposed pipeline route. The survey did not even go to everyone on or near Main Road and was deceptively worded to suggest that those who do not want public water need not reply. Only a handful of homeowners answering this survey indicated that they want public water now. Unfortunately' I was too tired, too hungry and too wary of driving home in the dark on a stormy night to stay for the SCWA segment of last Wednesday's trustees meeting. The two hours I spent there made me appreciate the difficult challenges the trustees face in trying to balance the demands of applicants with the need to protect our fragile shores, bays and wetlands. This application,at this time, however, should be easy: it must be rejected. Sincerely yours, �DRS cc: Representative Tim Bishop Anne Hopkins Supervisor Scott Russell Page I of I Standish, Lauren From: Anne MacKay [amackayl@optonline.net] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 7:35 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: info@orientwater.info Subject: SCWA Please help us and support Orient and the Town Board, which refused to extend the water map to Orient! SCWA has refused to listen to the people here who need to save one of the last lovely spots on the Island. If the water comes through, quarter acre zoning for developments would be terrible! There are other and better solutions to the water problem. Thankyou Anne MacKay P.O.Box 97, Orient, NY 11957 -F f amackayl@optonline.net L 7/30/2010 Standish, Lauren From: Russell, Scott ------- Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 9:10 AM , To: Standish, Lauren - Subject: FW: Orient Water Pipeline r -----Original Message----- �... j From: Tom Stevenson [mailto:ampell@optonline.riet}-- --- - - - -- Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:05 PM To: tkelly@timesreview.com; Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; info@orientwater.info Subject: Orient Water Pipeline -----Original message----- From: Tom Stevenson [mailto:ampell@optonline.net] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:49 PM To: Lauren.Standish@town.southold.ny.us Subject: Orient water Pipeline Dear Trustees of the Town of Southold, z am writing you as an Orient resident and concerned citizen about SCWA's attempt to obtain a permit from the Trustees to drill under Dam Pond. Besides for the fact that the vast majority of residents do not want SCWA's water main, we are also concerned about the environmental impact of digging in such a sensitive area as the Dam Pond and Causeway area. Runoff from construction will impact our vital wetlands and threaten the scallop seeding project that is under way in Orient Harbor. Please use the powers that you received when we, the citizenry, elected you to say NO to SCWA. Their permit application is incomplete and fails to unveil the full nature of the project. Again, please reject their application. Thank you. Sincerely, Tom Stevenson Oysterponds Farm Orient, NY 1 15435 Main Road East Marion,NY 11939 Jill Doherty, President — — - Jim King, Vice President Dave Bergen Bob Gosio, Jr John Bredemeyer Southold Town Trustees Dear Trustees, As an area resident I am astonished that the SCWA plan to proceed with the extension of the water main to Orient, despite the clear opposition of the majority of residents of Orient and the Southold Town Board. Even more astonishing to me is the duplicity of SCWA who, according to "The Suffolk Times,"told Congressman Tim Bishop that they would not proceed with the project and then applied for a wetlands permit. As a physician who deals with kidney patients on home dialysis who require water that is free of contamination, I know that such water can be obtained with the use of reverse osmosis systems, which are reliable, and not that expense to install or maintain. If indeed, this water main is only to supply 24 residents in Browns Hill why is the SCWA so concerned since these homes apparently already have existing water treatments? It is hard not to believe the speculations that SCWA's agenda is eventually to supply all of Orient and therefore make money in the process. I urge the Town Trustees to help preserve this unique area of New York State and not risk the potential environmental damage and increase in population density that may result if SCWA is permitted to go ahead. Sincerely, 6y4 _ p_ - Barbara G. Delano, MD, MPH C/Y�o Professor of Medicine-College of Medicine Professor- School of Public Health SUNY- Downstate Medical Center Page 1 of 4 Standish, Lauren From: John Kent Ukemail.pobox@gmail.coml Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 12:55 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Orient Water 07/30/2010 Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway —under and through wetlands. The question is not: Will there be a hurricane?But: when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion 7/30/2010 Page 2 of 4 (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents -- to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. 1. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50— 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits. That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributors to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE 7/30/2010 Page 3 of 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North ForWs leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a "80% majority" are disingenuous at best. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political 7/30/2010 Page 4 of 4 process. Thank you. Loraine Chiaramonte (electronic signature) 7/30/2010 Standish, Lauren From: Russell, Scott Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 12:59 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: FW: [NEWSENDER] -Opposing the Orient WAter Pipe- Message is from an unknown sender -----Original message----- From: Sebastian Heath [mailto:sebastian.heath@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:54 AM To: Russell, Scott Subject: [NEWSENDER] - Opposing the Orient WAter Pipe - Message is from an unknown sender Dear Mr. Russell, I am a homeowner in Orient village and am opposed to the SCWA's plan to put a pipe across the causeway. I encourage you to take whatever steps necessary to see that pipe is not put in place. Thank you, Sebastian Heath, 435 Skippers Lane Orient, NY. 1 Standish, Lauren From: mgsoares@rcn.com Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 10.59 PM To: Standish, Lauren; Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.info Subject: [NEWSENDER] - How is it possible?- Message is from an unknown sender Dear Trustees - It seems incomprehensible that the Orient community can be united against the proposed water main - and yet the Suffolk Water Authority is still trying to ram it down our throats. Please reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line from East Marion to Browns Hills. MG Soares August 2, 2010 i L 1 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: ronsoff@aol.com Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 12:13 PM To: Standish, Lauren; Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; Scott.Russell@town.southol.ny.us; tkelly@timesreview.com Subject: (NEWSENDER] -Orient Water Main - Message is from an unknown sender Dear all, I initially opposed the Orient Water Main, but I am worried now because of the consequences that contaminated water from Brown Hills Estates could find its way into our wells, and also contaminants from nearby farms spoiling our waterways and wells too. After all we are a very short distance away? Can any person guarantee otherwise, if so show us your scientific explanation. One more thing the cesspool water I suspect might be getting into our waterways and wells too, because I do smell some peculiar odors in the water in some of the homes here in Orient. (We do have a huge filter), I am really afraid to drink the water now even if it is filtered, I cannot give any child a drink from this water now. I do hope we can hook-up to town water soon. Thank you Long Time Orient Resident I c 8/2/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: William W. Schriever[wschriever@peconiclandingresident.org] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 6:20 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: William Gibbons Subject: [NEWSENDER] -Letter to Southold Town Trustees -Message is from an unknown sender Attachments: Letter to Trustees 7-30-10.doc Friday, July 30, 2010, 6:20 p.m. EDT Dear Lauren Standish: Attached is a letter addressed to the Southold Town Trustees in anticipation of their meeting scheduled for August 4. I am submitting this letter in support of the application by the Suffolk County Water Authority for a permit to extend their water main along the Main Road into the hamlet of Orient. Please see that a copy of this letter, either as printed from this attachment or as received by US mail, is delivered to the members of the Southold Town Trustees prior to their meeting scheduled for August 4. Thank you. William W. Schriever 20275 Main Road P. O. Box 128 Orient,NY 11957 8/2/2010 Standish, Lauren From: Lisa Yuskavage[lisayuskavage@me.com] Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 6:12 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.info Subject: [NEWSENDER]-Vote no! -Message is from an unknown sender Dear Ms. Standish, My husband , Matvey Levenstein and I live at 330 Maple Lane in orient. We are strongly against the water map being extended to orient. We would like you and the trustees to follow the lead of the Town Board and follow the Town code and SEQRA and reject this application at this time. Sincerely, Lisa Yuskavage 1 Standish, Lauren From: kentj@suffolk.lib.ny.us Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 12:44 PM Standish, Lauren To: - Subject: Orient Water News 07/30/2010 Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway —under and through wetlands. The question is not: Will there be a hurricane? But: when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95$ of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents -- to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. 1 I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point, throughout the village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50 - 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more development in Orient - at denser levels than current zoning permits. That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributors to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. 2 More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out Of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a "80% majority" are disingenuous at best. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. John Kent (electronic signature) July 30th, 2010. 3 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Edwin Blesch [eblesch@optimum.net] Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 12:39 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; Kenneth P. Lavalle; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.com Subject: [NEWSENDER] -SCWA-Message is from an unknown sender Dear Trustees, Southold Town: Like most Americans with an independent spirit, I have always resented people telling me what to do since they know better than 1. 1 surely know that my well provides abundant, safe, good-tasting water. It is tested regularly by both the County Health Department and a private water analysis firm, and it passes with flying colors. And I surely know that this water is better for my health than any piped in from elsewhere laden with chlorine. It has been reported that the SCWA has not presented its facts transparently. Why should I trust an outfit which does not have my interests in mind, but rather its own profits? I am incensed that SCWA planned to use federal monies meant to bolster the nation's economy. This plan is not necessary, not wanted, not sound environmentally. The government must use these scarce funds elsewhere where they are needed, wanted and sound, not on a frivolous project like this. Locally, how about using these funds to build a higher seawall on the south side of the Orient causeway? With polar ice melting, our normal high tides have become frighteningly threatening, even more so at full and new moon. Do Orienters really want to become an island with no egress in a major storm, for which we are overdue? Every argument against the wisdom of the SCWA project has already been eloquently made by a huge majority of residents directly concerned. The people have spoken. As with elections, the government must listen. As you trustees in charge of our beautiful peninsula's future welfare, I beg you not to sanction the permit to cross Dam Pond. We live here because we like a rural life, not one of the suburbs in Nassau and West Suffolk Counties. We simply do not want this shameless project. We do not like dictators in our country. Edwin J. Blesch Jr. - - 45 Youngs Road (aka 22495 Main Road) f P.O. Box 430 - Orient,NY 11957 631 3233858 Until Nov. 3 at 631 506 7501 8/2/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: azorient@aim.com Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 2:56 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] - Orient water- Message is from an unknown sender It is time for Orient to get good water. Nobody admits they have a problem. but they then ask what is a good way to clean the toilet. Other people have property which was farmed for years with chemicals that later proved to be life threatening. Please submit this letter for consideration. thank you Andrew& Catherine Zurl 250 Pettys dr PO Box 583 Orient, N.Y. 11957 azorient aol.com 8/2/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Anne Hopkins [ashopkins@optimum.net] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 9:43 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA application Lauren: Here it is in a form you can definitely read, but as noted, I have mailed individual paper copies. Anne Jill Doherty, President, Southold Town Board of Trustees — James King,Vice-President Dave Bergen' Bob Ghosio, Jr. John Bredemeyer July 29, 2010 Dear President Doherty and Trustees, This letter is in reference to the application of the Suffolk County Water Authwil y for a Weiland Permit for the installation of what they are calling a"transmission main"on Route 25 from East Marion to Brown's Hill Road, Orient. I am writing to request that you reject this application on several grounds. 1.The Board of Trustees should follow the lead of the Southold Town Board,which has rejected a proposed amendment to the town water map allowing SCWA to extend their pipeline into Orient. Most residents of Orient believe that SCWA should wait until the town completes its new Comprehensive Plan before proceeding with this pipeline 2.The Wetland Permit sought by SCWA is for drilling under Dam Pond,just one segment of the total project.The entire project,which would pass through wetlands,a historic district and along a scenic byway,should be subject to a full SEQRA review. 3.Although SCWA refers to this project as a"transmission main"to serve only Brown's Hills and homeowners along the Main Road route to Brown's Hills,the record shows that SCWA wants to use this pipeline as a way to bring public water to all of Orient.Therefore, before they are permitted to drill, according to SCWA's own regulations,they should survey all residents and proceed only if at least 40%of us agree to hook up. Because my house is less than 500 feet from Main Road, I did receive the flawed survey SCWA sent out to homeowners along the proposed pipeline route.The survey did not even go to everyone on or near Main Road and was deceptively worded to suggest that those who do not want public water need not reply. Only a handful of homeowners answering this survey indicated that they want public water now. Unfortunately, I was too tired,too hungry and too wary of driving home in the dark on a stormy night to stay for the SCWA segment of last Wednesday's trustees meeting.The two hours I spent there made me appreciate the difficult challenges the trustees face in trying to balance the demands of applicants with the need to protect our fragile shores, bays and wetlands. This application,at this time,however, should be easy: it must be rejected. Sincerely yours, Anne Hopkins 380 Platt Rd/P.O. Box 82 Orient, NY 11957 cc: Representative Tim Bishop Supervisor Scott Russell 8/2/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Anne Hopkins lashopkins@optimum.net] Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:05 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA Appication Lauren, My neighbor Constantine Bondarchuk asked me to send this letter for him as he does not have a computer. Anne Hopkins — — July 31,2010 _ Jill Doherty, President, Southold Town Board of Trustees James King,Vice President J _. Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio,Jr. --- John Bredemeyer r - Dear President Doherty and Trustees, I am writing to urge you to reject the application of the Suffolk Country Water Authority for a wetlands permit to dig under Dam Pond in order to bring a pipeline to Orient.Although SCWA calls this a"transmission main"to bring water to Brown's Hill,they have also said that they hope to bring public water to all of Orient. Under the State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA)this is an incomplete application and should not be considered separately. After crossing Dam Pond the pipeline would go through other fragile wetlands,a historic district and a scenic byway and should be subject to a full Type 1 SEQRA review. The Town Board refused SCWA's request to extend the water map to include Orient, and has asked SCWA not to attempt to extend its pipeline to Orient until Southold Town's Comprehensive Plan is complete.The Town Board also supports SCWA's own policy that no application to bring water to Orient should be considered until an independent survey demonstrates that at least 40%of Orient residents want to hook up.The Board of Trustees should not go against the Town Board in these positions. Most of us in Orient believe that our own wells, properly maintained and filtered if necessary, provide better quality water at less expense than SCWA. Sincerely yours, Constantine Bondarchuk 620 Platt Road,Orient, NY 11957 8/2/2010 r f William W. Schriever 20275 Main Road P. O. Box 128 Orient,NY 11957 Apartment 631-477-9009 Cell Phone 631-786-6252 July 30, 2010 Southold Town Trustees 53095 Route 25 P. O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 - Re: Water Main To Orient I Ladies and Gentlemen: I am writing to ask for your support for the extension of the water main to Orient by the Suffolk County Water Authority. I live in a house on the Main Road and I very much want to connect to this water main as soon as it becomes available. At the moment my water system needs major repairs and I decided to wait to install public water rather than to make another major investment in my own water system. With your support, I trust that the new water main will be in operation by later this fall. On April 6, 2010, I wrote a 3-page letter to the Southold Town Board sharing my experiences maintaining a private water system at my house in Orient over the last fifty years. In my letter I expressed my deep concern for the many problems the residents of Orient will encounter in the future if they must continue to depend entirely on private wells to obtain their domestic water. Also in my letter of April 6, I noted that having access to a 12-inch water main could provide Orient with much improved fire protection, both in supplying water for fire hydrants for use by the Orient Fire Department and in providing a reliable source of water under pressure to allow fire sprinklers to be installed in the larger buildings including my house. I understand that my letter of April 6 is now a matter of public record in the files of the Town of Southold and I refer you to it for a more detailed account. As all but the most naive among us must now be aware, this campaign by the members of the Orient Association to block the extension of the SCWA water main into Orient has little or nothing to do with supplying potable water to the residents of Orient and almost everything to do with seizing political power from the elected government at the Town, County and State levels. The basic premise of their campaign is that the Southold Town Board cannot be trusted to maintain the annroyriate zoning in the hamlet of Orient. They argue that the availability of public water anywhere in Orient will provide the Southold Town Board with an opportunity to downzone large tracts of land in Orient for high-density residential development thus affording an opportunity for(more)bad people to move to Orient and thereby destroy the tranquility which they found so attractive when they moved to Orient. The Orient Association masquerades as the Group for the East End and as Orient Water in an attempt to circumvent the restrictions placed by the IRS on their activities in consideration of their tax-exempt status as a charitable organization. I am not aware that they have ever committed an act of charity. Nor do I see any evidence in this campaign that they are acting for July 30,2010 - 1 - William W.Schriever William W. Schriever ' 20275 Main Road P. O. Box 128 Orient,NY 11957 Apartment 631-477-9009 Cell Phone 631-786-6252 the benefit of anyone but themselves. They seem quite determined to sacrifice the rights and the fortunes of any resident of Orient to achieve their political objectives. The members of the Orient Association derive their political power solely from their ability to intimidate and to manipulate the local politicians into carrying out their political objectives. Because they have been so well organized and adequately financed, they have become a formidable political force within the tiny hamlet of Orient. Apparently they even dream of incorporating a Village of Orient so they can achieve real political power of their own patterned after the Taliban in Afghanistan. It seems incredible to me that the local politicians have been so willing to support the members of the Orient Association in achieving their objectives when those same members treat the local politicians with such apparent contempt. For example, they refer to the Suffolk County Water Authority as if it were a private, for-profit enterprise when, in fact, it is a publicly-owned, nonprofit authority created for the benefit of all of the residents of Suffolk County. In opposing this application, the members of the Orient Association are simply trying to use the Southold Town Trustees to achieve their objective of gaining political control of the hamlet of Orient. As I wrote in my letter of April 6, "the voters of Orient helped elect you to office to represent them. The taxpayers of Orient help pay your salary and your expenses. It is time for you to represent the community in obtaining public water for Orient." Very truly yours, William W. Schriever July 30,2010 - 2 - William W.Schriever 74ell» IY Page 1 of 6 Standish, Lauren From: Russell, Scott Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:46 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: FW: Suffolk water has no right to do this to our community From: Giannelli, Frank [mailto:fg2232@columbia.edu] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 5:56 PM To: tkelly@timesreview.com Cc: Russell, Scott; frgiannelli@yahoo.com; Judy Giannelli Subject: Suffolk water has no right to do this to our community p I Please help Trustees: i i I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills,as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH,SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The 8/2/2010 Page 2 of 6 Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it.Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway-under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous.Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think:fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing,scallop and oyster nurseries,etc. could be devastating. C.CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E.INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer,a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance.Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine)upsets this balance,raises the water table,and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh)putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer,and the free dean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think:anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village,our fauns or 8/2/2010 Page 3 of 6 Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I.OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH,SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J.ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years.I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know,SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal,and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient,and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village,in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. 8/2/20 10 Page 4 of 6 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B.PART 2,Q 20,IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO . ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no,despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations,hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route,only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly,dose to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" 8/2/2010 Page 5 of 6 Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E.NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme,and negotiation tactics in bad faith,SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal,State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant,erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served,and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA,as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent Political process. Thank you. 8/2/2010 Page 6 of 6 (signed and dated) Columbia University Facilities 636 W. 131 st Street NY, NY 10027 212,851.7336 Office 646.404,2489 Cell Fg2232@Columbia.edu 8/2/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: smeganl@optonline.net Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 10:05 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: joh.schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; marc@marcalessi.com; ed@edromainecom; Russell, Scott Subject: SCWA application for wetlands permit Dear Trustees: Having attended yesterday's meeting with Scott Russell and many members of the Orient community, I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the SCWA's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line from East Marion to Brown's Hills. There is insufficient demand for this water supply in Orient -homeowners on Browns Hills are opposed to the pipeline, the SCWA has not demonstrated that 40 percent of the population wants the pipeline (the criteria they use in other instances), and close to 300 Orient residents have signed a petition that says "Not at this time." I share the concern of many Orient residents that, should the SCWA be granted permission to run the pipeline, they will begin pumping water from Orient's aquifer west to other communities. Ultimately this will threaten the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of orient residents - to the benefit of SCWA which has made it plain that they are "in the business of selling water". Sincerely, Suzanne Egan 37415 Main Road Orient,NY 11957 I 8/2/2010 Page 1 of 3 Standish, Lauren From: amy gross [amypgl@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 11:41 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us: Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Scott.Rusell@town.southold.ny.us; tkely@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.info i Subject: SCWA and Orient Thu,July 29.2010 1030 54 AM Dear Trustees: I believe it is our cnnc and legal du to re'e y g ty I ht the Suffolkf County Water, _ Authority's application for a wetlands permit forafransmission fine"From East Marion to Browns Hills,as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries,etc. could be devastating. C.CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer,and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. 8/2/2010 Page 2 of 3 K I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J.ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, ..segmentation", is illegal,and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County,that has not led directly to development. ev Outside delopers are'already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no,despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) 8/2/2010 Page 3 of 3 OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme,and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of troth parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served,and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA,as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-eamed tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Amy Gross 740 Northview Drive Brown's Hils 8/2/10 8/2/2010 Standish Lauren From: William McNaught[wmcn@optonline.net] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 1:41 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: ion.Schneider@mail.house.gov; Russell, Scott; Marc@marcalessi.com, lavalle@senate.state.ny Subject: SCWA's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line from East Marion to Browns Hills in Orient To the Southold Town Trustees: I am a resident of Orient and I am writing to urge you to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission pipeline from East Marion to Browns Hills in Orient. There are compelling legal reasons for you to reject the application and yhe local community is overwhelmingly against SCWA's project in Orient. I believe it is your duty for both these reasons to reject SCWA's application. William McNaught August 2, 2010 1 Page 1 of 2 t Standish, Lauren From: BKLYNPHYS@aol.com Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:15 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA's Wetlands Permit Application Dear Lauren Standish I would appreciate it very much if you would place copies of this email in mail boxes of the Board members listed below. Thank you, Michael D. Delano ------------------------------------------------ To Southold Town Board of Trustees Jill Doherty, President James King, Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio Jr. John Bredemeyer July 30, 2010 I am a physicist with some fairly extensive Post Doctoral Fellowship training in astrophysics and physiological physics. And I am terribly concerned about the physical safety of Orient residents should the water-main-extension that the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) has so aggressively pushed for becomes a reality. For 191/2 years my wife and I have owned a house and a 2.5-acre plot of land whose southern boundary extends across Route 25 to Orient Harbor. We have right of way to Dam Pond and Trumans Beach where I have easily walked our Golden Retrievers 2,000 times and am thoroughly familiar with that ecosystem,to say the least. Without going into the politics and the potential danger to Dam Pond's stunning environment I have done some map measurements and calculations and come to some alarming conclusions I'm sure SCWA has never bothered to consider: 1)Dam Pond has a water surface area of 100 acres, a mean depth of 4 feet and contains about 130 million gallons of salt water. 2) Because of the tides in Orient Harbor about 1.5 billion gallons of salt water flow in and out of Dam Pond in the course of a year, all of it through that narrow channel over which the Route 25 bridge passes and under which the proposed water main would tunnel. 3) While very rare, I have seen, on two separate occasions, harbor water barreling through that narrow channel at speeds approaching 15 mph during severe storms. A one-foot section of the proposed 12-inch-diameter pipeline exposed to such violent flows would experience a force approaching 15,000 ponds and the very real possibility of rupture and extensive leakage of fresh water exists. 4) The interior salinity of marine organisms and plant cells is the same as their exterior salinity. With zero salinity, if pure water due to pipe rupture surrounds the indigenous living cells in Dam Pond they will swell and burst and die because of absorption of salt-free-water by osmosis. 5) Dam Pond has an extensive system of sandy mud flats that are stabilized by an equally extensive root system of marsh-like grasses. If salt-free-water-osmosis kills these root systems, the mud flats will eventually be disrupted by tides and the only barrer separating Orient Harbor from the Long Island Sound is Trumans Beach which is less than 75 yards wide. 6) In the 191/2 years we have been on the East End of the North Fork I have observed a not insignificant erosion of the north shore of Trumans Beach into the LI Sound, especially near the western end of Dam Pond. If SCWA's tunnel-excavation 8/2/2010 Page 2 of 2 on Route 25 destabilizes Dam Pond's mud flats, it's hard to believe, but the only thing separating Orient from the "Long Island Main Land"would be skinny Trumans Beach! Could SCWA's pipeline project turn Orient into an Island like Plum Island? I urge, in the strongest possible terns, that SCWA's wetlands permit application be denied and insist that a thorough, independent, environmental impact study on the Dam Pond region be carried out. Nothing less than the safety of Orient residents and some East Marion residents are at stake if the concerns I have outlined above turn out to be correct. Sincerely, Michael D. Delano, PhD 15435 Route 25 Eat Marion,NY 11939 631-477-9531 8/2/2010 f - William W. Schriever 20275 Main Road P. 0. Box 128 Orient,NY 11957 Apartment 631-477-9009 Cell Phone 631-786-6252 July 30, 2010 Southold Town Trustees 53095 Route 25 P. O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 I - Re: Water Main To Orient Ladies and Gentlemen: — - ----- I am writing to ask for your support for the extension of the water main to Orient by the Suffolk County Water Authority. I live in a house on the Main Road and I very much want to connect to this water main as soon as it becomes available. At the moment my water system needs major repairs and I decided to wait to install public water rather than to make another major investment in my own water system. With your support, I trust that the new water main Will be in operation by later this fall. On April 6, 2010, I wrote a 3-page letter to the Southold Town Board sharing my experiences maintaining a private water system at my house in Orient over the last fifty years. In my letter I expressed my deep concern for the many problems the residents of Orient Will encounter in the future if they must continue to depend entirely on private wells to obtain their domestic water. Also in my letter of April 6, 1 noted that having access to a 12-inch water main could provide Orient with much improved fire protection, both in supplying water for fire hydrants for use by the Orient Fire Department and in providing a reliable source of water under pressure to allow fire sprinklers to be installed in the larger buildings including my house. I understand that my letter of April 6 is now a matter of public record in the files of the Town of Southold and I refer you to it for a more detailed account. As all but the most naWe among us must now be aware, this campaign by the members of the Orient Association to block the extension of the SCWA water main into Orient has little or nothing to do with supplying potable water to the residents of Orient and almost everything to do with seizing political power from the elected government at the Town, County and State levels. The basic premise of their campaign is that the Southold Town Board cannot be trusted to maintain the appropriate zoning in the hamlet of Orient. They argue that the availability of public water anywhere in Orient will provide the Southold Town Board with an opportunity to downzone large tracts of land in Orient for high-density residential development thus affording an opportunity for (more) bad people to move to Orient and thereby destroy the tranquility which they found so attractive when they moved to Orient. The Orient Association masquerades as the Group for the East End and as Orient Water in an attempt to circumvent the restrictions placed by the IRS on their activities in consideration of their tax-exempt status as a charitable organization. I am not aware that they have ever committed an act of charity. Nor do I see any evidence in this campaign that they are acting for July 30,2010 - 1 - William W. Schriever A William W. Schriever 20275 Main Road P. O. Box 128 Orient,NY 11957 Apartment 631-477-9009 Cell Phone 631-786-6252 the benefit of anyone but themselves. They seem quite determined to sacrifice the rights and the fortunes of any resident of Orient to achieve their political objectives. The members of the Orient Association derive their political power solely from their ability to intimidate and to manipulate the local politicians into carrying out their political objectives. Because they have been so well organized and adequately financed, they have become a formidable political force within the tiny hamlet of Orient. Apparently they even dream of incorporating a Village of Orient so they can achieve real political power of their own patterned after the Taliban in Afghanistan. It seems incredible to me that the local politicians have been so willing to support the members of the Orient Association in achieving their objectives when those same members treat the local politicians with such apparent contempt. For example, they refer to the Suffolk County Water Authority as if it were a private, for-profit enterprise when, in fact, it is a publicly-owned, nonprofit authority created for the benefit of all of the residents of Suffolk County. In opposing this application, the members of the Orient Association are simply trying to use the Southold Town Trustees to achieve their objective of gaining political control of the hamlet of Orient. As I wrote in my letter of April 6, "the voters of Orient helped elect you to office to represent them. The taxpayers of Orient help pay your salary and your expenses. It is time for you to represent the community in obtaining public water for Orient." � Veryours W. Schriever July 30,2010 - 2 - William W.Schriever R ►Ti F RuS KINMOSCOUFALTISCHEK ec. Counselors at Lary Writer's Direct Dial: (516)663-6515 Writer's Direct Fax: (516)663-6715 Writer's E-Mail: emurray@rmfpc.com August 2, 2010 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Board of Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0939 - Re: Application of Suffolk County Water Authority- Wetland Permit Dear Trustees: We are the attorneys for Fredrica Wachsberger, Venetia Hands, Marianne Liberatore, Amal Chaudhuri and Betty Roe, who are either residents of the Browns Hill Road section of the Town of Southold, or reside in the other portions of the Orient community. This letter is submitted in opposition to the Application by the Suffolk County Water Authority ("SCWA") for a Wetland Permit to permit the installation of a water transmission main in the road bed along Route 25 from East Marion to Browns Hill Road, Orient ("Application"). As explained below, the Application fails to meet the requirements of Southold Town Code ("Town Code") Art. 275 and should be denied. Town Code §275-6(11) requires that any permit application contain "documentary proof of permits that have been applied for, are pending, and have been granted, including but not limited to NYSDEC, Suffolk County Health Department, USACOE". Pursuant to a resolution approved by the Town Board in 2000, SCWA is required to obtain the approval of the Town Board to amend the Water Supply Map in order to proceed with the water transmission main. The Application does not reference that the SCWA has applied for and obtained this approval. In fact, the Town Board has specifically refused to amend the Water Supply Map to permit the proposed water transmission main. Accordingly, SCWA's permit Application is insufficient because it does not reference the application for the amendment to the Water Supply Map as required by §275-6(11), nor does it reference the SCWA's failure to obtain the required amendment. East Tower, 15th Floor, 1425 RXR Plaza, Uniondale, NY 11556-1425 • 516.663.6600 r 212.688.8300 r F 516.663.6601 r www.rmfpc.com R► i F RUS KI NMOSCOUFALT►SCH EK rc. Cwalwl,n at hm August 2, 2010 Page 2 Further, Town Code §275-6(2) requires that any application for a Wetland Permit contain a "schedule for the proposed activities with a completion date". The Application does not contain this required information. And, although SCWA's counsel stated at the public hearing that the project would start after Labor Day and be completed by October 31, 2010, this statement is not sufficient to correct the failure to include this information on the Application. Pursuant to the Town Code §275-6(A), the Application is required to be in writing, and verified. Accordingly, the schedule for the work must be set forth in writing and verified. The Application should have had all required information prior to the public hearing so that interested persons would have the opportunity to comment, including commenting on the proposed work schedule. Although §275-6(B)permits the Town Trustees to waive certain requirements concerning the Application, the requirements of §275-6(2) is not one which the Trustees are empowered to waive. Simply put, the Town Code specifically requires that there be a schedule for the proposed activities with a completion date included in the application, which must be in writing and verified. SCWA's Application does not meet this requirement, and as a result, the Application is deficient and the Town Trustees are not empowered to forgive this deficiency. In addition, SCWA's application does not meet the requirements of §275-6(6) in that it does not specify the depth of the excavation throughout the project area, only providing this information with regard to a limited portion of the project. Also, §275-6(7) is not complied with in that there is no description in the Application as to where materials being excavated will be stored during the duration of the project. Accordingly, since the Application fails to comply with the statutory requirements of §275-6, it is legally deficient and should be rejected. Further, even if the Application met the requirements of §275-6, Town Code §275-12(I) requires the Trustees to reject an application if the proposed project would "otherwise adversely effect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town". As indicated above, the Town Board has specifically rejected the SCWA's request to amend the Water Supply Map. To grant a Wetland Permit without this approval is not only contrary to the Town Code, but flies in the face of the express procedural framework adopted by the Town Board. Further, the population to be served by this water transmission main is overwhelmingly opposed to this RiF RUSKI NMOSCOUFALTISCHEKec. Coanw1w,at Lain August 2, 2010 Page 3 project. If the project goes forward there is a risk of overdevelopment in the Orient area, and the residents have expressed a desire to implement other alternatives to obtain their water supply. Finally, Town Code §268-5 requires review of the Application for consistency with the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. As of the date of the public hearing, no such review had taken place. The SCWA has specifically stated that the Trustees' approval of this Wetland Permit will indicate that the Trustees are in favor of the project in general, and will reflect community support for the project. However, now matter how the Trustees feel about the project, the Town Code contains specific requirements for a Wetland Permit application. The Application is clearly deficient. Further, the project will adversely affect the Town and should be rejected. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, E. Christopher Murray ECM:emr cc: Timothy Hopkins, Esq. (by FedEx) 493160\1 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: farm1@optonline.net Sent: Tuesday,August 03, 2010 8:08 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott;tkelly@timesreview.com Subject: SCWA Water Application for Orient Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From - -- East Marion to Browns Hills,as it fails to fulfill many criteria. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly - susceptible to Flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly r -- because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area,out into Orient Harbor and the fishing,scallop and oyster nurseries,etc. could be devastating. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh)putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer,and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents—to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient,and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. I request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA,as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you Cheryl Tortoriello/Aug 3,2010 8/3/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: William Clayton [claytonwilliam@me.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 4:56 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -Fwd: SUPPORT OF SCWA WATER EXTENSION -Message is from an unknown sender From: William Clayton <william.clayton main_road.Com> Date: August 2, 2010 3:57:54 PM EDT To: lauren.stand ish@town_southold.ny,_us Cc: Barbara Clayton <BAC808PHH@AOL.COM> Subject: SUPPORT OF SCWA WATER EXTENSION Ms Lauren Standish and the Town of Southold Board of Trustees: My wife Barbara and I are residents at 12832 Main Road in East Marion near Dam Pond and the causeway. We do not have SCWA piped water. We do have a well with various filtration systems. We also own a residence at 8125 Main Road in East Marion that does have SCWA piped water. It is our experience and view that SCWA piped water is preferential to filtered well water. We therefore SUPPORT the extension of the proposed SCWA water main east through East Marion and into Orient, thereby enabling us to access SCWA piped water and abandon the use of well water at our 12832 residence. - Thank you, - Bill & Barbara Clayton i 8/3/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: navtokarev@aol.com Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 7:58 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA's Application Dear Ms Standish Please place the copy of this mail to the Trustees mailboxes. Thank you. Dear Trustees, we write you in regards of SCWA's application to lay a pipeline to Orient. We attended both The Trustees' Public Hearing on July 21 and Southold Town Supervisor Scott Russell's Meeting with Orient residents on August 1. We believe that our access to water should not become dependent on SCWA's monopoly. We ask you to follow Town Code and SEQRA and reject SCWA's application at this time. Vlad Tokarev& Nadia Shokhen PoBox 573 230 Oyster Pond Lane Orient, NY 11957 8/3/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Chris Wedge Uchris.wedge@gmail.coml Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:43 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com Subject: [NEWSENDERj-SCWA- Message is from an unknown sender To: L_auren.standish�town.southold.ny us For distribution to the Southold Town Trustees cc' Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov For distribution to Congressman Tim Bishop Kenneth LaValle: lavalle senate state nv.us _. Marc Alessi: Marc marcalessi.com Ed Romaine: Ed@—EdRomaine.com -- Scott Russell: Scott.Russelll@town.so_uthold.ny_us Tim Kelly: tkelly@"esreview.com y y@timesrevlew.com Dear Southold Town Trustees, I am writing to implore you to deny the SCWAs application to drill underneath the environmentally vulnerable Oyster Ponds estuary to run the proposed Browns Hills water main. Aside from the potential damage that could result from the drilling, should anything happen to that pipe in the future, fresh water could inundate Dam Pond and ruin the delicate balance of salinity necessary to maintain wildlife there. Repair efforts could further disturb this area that has been so carefully protected in the past. I am sure that you are aware that hundreds of Orient residents are opposed to this water pipe in the first place. The pipeline is completely unnecessary. The Orient aquifer more than provides for the needs of the residents of our small community. SCWA is railroading the project to pursue their own interests, not the least of which is potential access to the Orient aquifer itself for distribution westward. There is also strong public opposition from both of the North Forks leading environmental organizations, as well as leading farmers and fishermen. As stewards of the marine wetlands in our area I also ask you to defend against the inevitable future encroachment on Orients natural resources by the increased development density that this water pipe will invite. At the moment our Town Trustees seem to be the last line of defense against this intrusion into the health and welfare of Orient home owners of by a private company. Please reject this application.Nobody in Orient needs SCWA's water, but we do need what we've got. Sincerely, Chris Wedge 100 Harbor Road Orient, NY 8/3/2010 Standish, Lauren From: Ifeigelson@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:19 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -SCWA wetland permit application/water main - Message is from an unknown sender To the Town Trustees: We trust you will come to the same conclusion as the Southold town board and reject this application. we hope you are aware of the adverse effects on wetlands, marine life, aquatic life and natural vegetation; the causeway, vulnerable to flood & storm damage; the danger to Dam Pond & Orient Harbor from a break in a main line going under and through the wetlands. From an engineering standpoint, no study has been done with regard to the pressure such a pipeline will withstand; already on record, there are 200+ incidents of broken/frozen pipelines every winter; the intrusion of saltwater and the risk to Orient wells. It is clear that the Orient aquifer is fragile and should be protected. It is clear, too, that more than 90% of Orienters are opposed to a pipeline, including those who reside in Browns Hills. So, who will benefit from this proposed project? As a public benefit company, SCWA should serve the interests of the entire community, not just a handful (17) whose needs may have other, less-expensive solutions. We urge you to carefully consider any underlying intent, and to thoroughly investigate the potential problems of a pipeline that SCWA is so eager to run. Thank you for your attention, Linda & Eugene B. Feigelson, MD Orient 1 AYC/ 4-1 To the Southold Town Board of Trustees: Re: SCWA Pipeline Application It is my understanding that the Town Trustees are to concern themselves with the quality and general condition of the wetlands within the Town's borders. The application you are reviewing from SCWA for a pipeline across Dam Pond and the two miles beyond affects far more than the bit of wetlands it traverses. Observing your recent meeting, the pattern established seemed to be "if the application extends beyond the Trustees jurisdiction" it is approved. What??? How can an agency approve an application for which it has no jurisdiction? How about: "The application is hereby referred to the" appropriate jurisdiction. Or simply "dismissed"M At some point in the future, perhaps at your next scheduled meeting, you may schedule a vote on this application. It should only occur if: There is abundant advance notice of the vote, date, time and location, to the public and to each and everyone of those persons who has corresponded to you on the subject, and That the vote be a roll call vote, publicly and audibly conducted. Please remember, you are in a position to totally and irreversibly affect the lives and property of the entire community/hamlet of Orient. Orient is just a few pebbles shy of being an island. The fewer links to the "main land"the healthier everything: wetlands; water sources; vegetation; and the people, will be. You've seen the following elsewhere, but I repeat it here: "The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer... a"bubble" of fresh water surrounded by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine)upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates pollution of the aquifer with disinfectant by-products like trihalomethanes (Group B Carcinogens) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95% of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents... to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge more of us for water." Thank you for your service to the Town of Southold. Please continue to conduct that service with integrity and intelligence. Sincerely, Elizabeth R. Rowe 1850 Youngs Road Orient,New York 11957 Cl -Tcvxsi ets As c �� W e J. A. Mould 330 Village Lane PO Box 445 Orient, NY 11957-0445 August 1, 2010 Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall 53095 Rt. 25 Southold, NY 11971 To the Board of Trustees, I have followed SCWA's plan to extend their water pipeline to the residents of Brown's Hill. Extending the pipe line at a cost of several million dollars, (much of it taxpayers dollars), is questionable at best. The pipeline, to serve fewer than 24 residents so that some of them will no longer need filters, is difficult to justify. I can't help but conclude that SCWR had another motive. From what I've heard the rest of us in Orient don't need such a pipeline. Certainly, the money, supplied by the Federal Government, could be put to better use in the Town of Southold. Sincerely, J. A. Mould u" AUG - 2010 ' sL TiAJI. JCUT'Gl4D Page 1 of 3 -4 Standish, Lauren From: Dorothy Abbott [dotabb@optonline.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:48 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA water pipe to Orient Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway-under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think:fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing,scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine)upsets this balance, raises the water table,and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village,our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. 1. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J.ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, ,.segmentation", 8/3/2010 Page 2 of 3 is illegal,and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient,and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA stales no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route,only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. 8/3/2010 Page 3 of 3 We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Dorothy Abbott 1790 Diedricks Rd, Orient 8/3/2010 Page 1 of 3 1 , Standish, Lauren From: Karen Braziller[kbraziller@perseabooks.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:25 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com Subject: Orient and SCWA To. Lauren_stan_dish@town southgtd.ny:us p For distribution to the Southold Town Trustees i I cc: - _ -- Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov For distribution to Congressman Tim Bishop Kenneth LaValle: lavalle@senate.state.ny.us Marc Alessi: Marc@marcalessi.com Ed Romaine: Ed@EdRomaine.com Scott Russell:Soott.pussell@town.southold.ny.us Tim Kelly:tkelbQtimesneview.com August 3, 2010 via email Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills,as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think:fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C.CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. 8/3/2010 Page 2 of 3 E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table,and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh)putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal,and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the 8/3/2010 Page 3 of 3 pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme,and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served,and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA,as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Karen Braziller 640 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 8/3/2010 Page 1 of 1 . M Standish, Lauren From: Orientexpress4l4@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:46 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: correction to previous e-mail Dear Lauren,in an e-mail just sent to you I would like to correct one sentence.ln my previous e-mail I wrote that the Suffolk County Water Authority warned about the hazards of drinking the water. I would like to correct it by saying that it was the Suffolk County Department Of Health that issued that warning to me. Please pass this on to the Board of Trustees. Thank You — William Gibbons 8/3/2010 Page 1 of 1 +N Standish, Lauren From: Orientexpress4l4@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:12 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Fwd: Letter to Southold Town Board of Trustees From: Orientex ress414 aol.com � - __ p @ To: lauren.standish@town, southold.ny.us@aol.com _ Sent: 8/3/2010 3:08:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Letter to Southold Town Board of Trustees Dear Lauren Standish; Attached is a letter to the Southold Town Trustees in regard to their pending vote on granting a permit to the Suffolk County Water Authority to extend their water main along the Main Road into Orient. I am in full support of the Board Of Trustees in granting this permit 1 Would like to add a few comments and reasons for my support for this project. If you do not receive many letters from the homeowners that this project affects the most , it's not because they don't want public water, it's simply because they have been intimidated by the Orient Association , their phantom website, and large amounts of money funneled to this group through the "Group For The East End ". There are many people that have business connections or in some way connected to local government feel that they would be put in a compromised position if they voiced their opinion in favor of having public water come to their community. Some even feel reprisal if they did so. In my particular case I have had gasoline , very high nitrate levels along with several hundred other contaminates, pesticides, and trace amounts of countless other elements,and bacteria. The Suffolk County Water Authority has warned that no one should be drinking this water, especially pregnant women, people on dialysis, people undergoing chemotherapy, people with compromised immune systems, and small children. Obtaining public water has always' been a health issue and not an issue of development. The Oysterponds elementary school pays $ 5,000 dollars per year to have their water tested, and the company that tests it does not test for gasoline in the water. If they had public water, it would be tested for free. With public water the school would be able to install a fire preventing water sprinkler system because of the increased water pressure. A system such as that would bring added protection not only for the students and staff, but for the building itself. The school's insurance rate would be greatly reduced. I was told by the Orient fire department ( who are in favor of public water) that a fire hydrant would be placed on the road in front of the school. With public water I too would be able to install a sprinkler system in my home and reduce my homeowners insurance by ten to twenty percent. In closing I beg the board to approve the permit to the water authority. Respectfully; William Gibbons 27840 Main Road Orient,NY 11957 631-323-0105 orientexpress414@aol.com 8/3/2010 Post Office Box 569 1 ` V Post Office Box 19 Britlgehampton,NY 11932 Southold,NY 11971 Tel:631.537.1400 Tel:631,765.6450 Fax 631.537.2201 FOR THE EAST END Fax:631.765.6455 August 3, 2010 "-4 Jill Dougherty, President President Town of Southold Board of Town TrusteesRobert S.DeLuca 54375 Main Road (Route 25) P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Southold, New York 11971 William S.McChesney,Jr. RE: Applicant: Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Vice chairman Application Type: Wetlands Permit - Chapter 275 of Southold Town Code Ann Colley Application Date: 6/25/2010 Board Members Harris A.Barer Project Description: Katherine Leahy Birch W.Marco Birch Install 17,200 linearfeet of water main between East Marion and the Browns Hills Wilhelmus B.Bryan subdivision, Orient, New York Mark Burchill Andrew Goldstein Mark A.Hissey Dear Ms. Dougherty; Gregory Hoogkamp Ronald S.Lauder I write on behalf of Group for the East End to offer the following comments on the above Sandra R.Meyer referenced application. For the record, Group for the East End is a professionally staffed Christopher Pia 501(c)(3), not-for-profit, environmental organization representing the conservation and Dee Dee Ricks community planning interests of several thousand individuals, families and businesses across Peter Schellbach the five towns of eastern Long Island. We represent approximately 280 members who reside John Shea in Southold Town. John C.Waddell Mary walker I. Author's Credentials: For the record, I hold a Bachelors Degree in Environmental Science from Fordham University, and a Master's Degree in Environmental Science from the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, and have served as the President and Executive Director of Group for the East End for the last 18 years. Prior to my current position, I served as a Biologist and Senior Environmental Analyst for the Suffolk County Health Department's Office of Ecology for seven years. At the Office of Ecology, I was directly responsible for the environmental impact assessment of hundreds of complex development proposals pursuant to the requirements of State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and served as the Suffolk County Health Department's SEQRA liaison to the Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality. In addition to these professional responsibilities, I have taught State and Local Environmental Policy with specific emphasis on the rules and regulations governing the implementation of SEQRA for 15 years, as and adjunct professor at Long Island University. We protect and restore the environment of eastern Long Island through education,citizen action and public advocacy. founded in 1972 www.groupfortheeastend.org 50%Post Consumer/50%Bamboo Fibcvs GR UP FOR THE EAST END II. Summary Statement: A review of the available materials pertaining to the subject action demonstrate the need for a significantly expanded level of environmental review for the overall 17,200 foot expansion of the SCWA's water supply system into the hamlet of Orient. In the absence of such a review, we do not believe the Town Trustees can make a defensible decision, which achieves the stated goals of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code (Wetlands and Shorelines), nor the environmental review mandates of SEQRA. As a result, we oppose the issuance of wetlands permit based on currently available information. In addition to the overall magnitude of this action, and the incomplete and inaccurate information contained in environmental review materials, the project's permanence; potential short and long- term consequences for the area's wetlands and wider environment; conflict with the duly adopted rejection project rejection by the Southold Town Board; and overwhelming public opposition, it would seem highly imprudent to issue an approval. III. Primary Issues of Concern: With respect to the requirements of Chapter 325, we believe additional data is required to properly assess any potential effects that could be created by the introduction of millions of gallons of freshwater into the shallow Orient Flow System. The potential impact on flooding conditions and wetlands ecology over time should be examined. In particular we are very concerned that the issue of long-term groundwater mounding be fully examined with respect to water table elevations, increased flooding potential, and any potential for decreased salinity along the tidal creeks and Mashes of East Marion and Orient. We also believe that the Trustees should examine the potential impacts on water service and the environment in the event of a storm-induced breach in the Orient Causeway that may directly impact the transmission line into Orient. As a result of these issues and other potential community planning impacts, we strongly recommend that the Town Trustees require the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this proposal pursuant to SEQRA. A DEIS would provide a meaningful and comparative assessment of potential wetlands issues, water supply alternatives and a range of community planning issues, such as growth inducement that could result from the installation of such a significant expanse of infrastructure. A detailed and objective evaluation of such impacts is particularly important given the unanimous resolution of the Southold Town Board, which rejected an expansion of public water into Orient, In addition, the scale and magnitude of the overall action relative to other infrastructure improvements in the Town, the irreversible nature of potential impacts associated with a permanent pipeline installation, the long term consequences of adding millions of gallons if freshwater to the present shallow water table in Orient, and the unprecedented level of public opposition are all best addressed through the DEIS process. 2 F0"6 Post C'oruunsv...W, B=boo F,h... G IPF THE EAST END Given the importance of a full SEQRA evaluation to the overall assessment of this proposal, we take strong exception to the publicly stated position of counsel to the Trustees (Lori M. Hulse) who wrongly advised both the Town Trustees and members of the public (at the public hearing of July 21, 2009), that the SEQRA process for this application was completed and affirmed by the Courts. Ms. Hulse's vigorous defense of this position severely restricted valuable public comment at the hearing for this action, and greatly undermined the value of public participation that should be welcomed during any public hearing process. We wish to point out,that the position articulated by Ms. Hulse regarding SEQRA compliance appears to be in direct conflict with the position taken by Assistant Town Attorney, Jennifer Andeloro (as well as the Suffolk Count Supreme Court) in her statements before the court in the underlying matter of Ryall, et. al. v. SCWA, which was argued in open court on April 28, 2010. I was in the courtroom for the oral arguments on this case and have subsequently reviewed the record of the proceedings, which affirm that the assertions made by Ms. Hulse, are simply not supported by the facts. Prior to making any final dezision on this application, we strongly urge the Trustees to carefully review the record of the oral argument in the Ryall case(Exhibit A) and reconcile the statements of Attorney Hulse with the stated position of the Town of Southold and the Suffolk County Supreme Court's own findings regarding the future application of SEQRA to the assessment of the overall action by the Town. After a review of the proceedings, we believe the Town Trustees should make an immediate effort to re-notice and re-hear the subject application, correct the record with respect to SEQRA review and allow further public input on the matter of comprehensive environmental review. The following information is provided to further substantiate our position. IV. Chapter 275—Wetlands—Permit Standards In addition to the array of issues that require consideration under SEQRA, there are several substantive considerations under the Town Wetlands law that should be further examined and addressed prior to any further action on this proposal. In particular, Chapter 275-12 (Standards for the issuance of a permit) provide for the issuance of permit only when the Trustees can determine that a proposed action will not substantially; "adversely affect wetlands"; "increase the danger ofJlood and storm-tide damage", and adversely affect the "natural movement orJlow of any water"and "adversely affect fish, shellfish, or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife, and vegetation or the natural habitat thereof 3 50` Post Consumer/oab Bamboo Fibers G I UPF THE EAST END In evaluating these criteria, we strongly recommend that the Trustees carefully consider the potential impact of groundwater mounding associated with the long-term introduction of otherwise absent flow of freshwater into the isolated Orient flow system. This evaluation must include the potential for complete service to the hamlet as this is the likely long-term outcome of this major water transmission main installation. The basis for this request lies in the concern that the long-term consequences of increased freshwater from a major public water main may elevate groundwater levels over time. Such conditions can be observed in and around leaching rings and drainage systems where increased flow produces locally elevated groundwater levels and may exacerbate flooding. The Trustees may well recall the length of time it took for water to infiltrate back down into the ground after this spring's heavy rains. In fact, water levels were so high in some spots that local roadways were flooded for weeks after the heaviest rains. If such conditions already exist, the long-term introduction of millions of gallons of"new" water should be carefully examined in the context of present groundwater levels. Using rough numbers, the average annual water service to 700 Orient properties (as a daily rate of 250 gallons/day) would deliver approximately 65 million gallons/year to the hamlet where there is virtually no opportunity for deep flow recharge. The consequences over time should be considered. In addition to the potential for increased flooding, the Trustees should explore whether or not the long-term introduction of millions of gallons of freshwater into Orient's shallow water table could impact the relative levels of salinity in and around the hamlets valued tidal marshes. As the Trustees are likely aware, an increasing body of scientific evidence now suggests that certain invasive species such as Phragmites (which degrade the diversity of coastal wetlands) appear to have more competitive success in areas of lowered salinity. In considering the approval of an application, the Board would be well advised to contemplate the unforeseen consequences of this infrastructure on the natural resources it is clearly commissioned to protect. V. Compliance with SEORA: In a letter dated 4/22/10(Exhibit B), Town Attorney, Martin Finnegan advised the SCWA that a related 2009 administrative permit issued by the Town Trustees (Exhibit C) for approximately 600 feet of directional drilling under Dam Pond did not reflect the full scope of the Authority's 17,200 foot water line installation, nor did it reflect the full extent of the Trustee's regulatory jurisdiction over the entire project. In his letter, Mr. Finnegan pointed out that the segmented review of a larger action into smaller parts was contrary to the mandates of New York State Conservation Law and called upon SCWA to amend its application to reflect the overall action that was actually under consideration. 4 50"b Port Camsumev/i0'x.Bamboo Fibers GR UP i FOR THE EAST END On June 25, 2010, the Southold Town Trustees received a"Town of Southold, Board of Trustees Application" for a"Wetlands Permit"from the SCWA (Exhibit D) along with other design and permit-related information. The application submitted was for a full project review(not an administrative permit or an amendment to a prior administrative permit). The application did not contain a full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) prepared by the SCWA but rather included a copy of an unsigned EAF that was originally part of the Town Board's water map amendment file. Most importantly, the SCWA's accompanying cover letter(Exhibit E)asserted that since both the SCWA and the Town Trustees (in a prior administrative permit for directional drilling under Dam Pond) had previously decided that the proposal was a Type II action, there would be no need for further environmental review. The letter failed to point out the fact that the administrative permit issued by the Trustees did not evaluate 95% or approximately 16,000 liner feet of the overall project, the fact that the Town Board had voted unanimously to reject the project, and the fact that that Town Attorney clearly advised the SCWA (in his letter of 4/22/10) that the Trustees had not reviewed the entire pipeline proposal in issuing their prior permit. The SCWA cover letter also failed to mention the ruling of Suffolk Supreme Court Justice Ralph Costello, whose April 28, 2010 decision(in the related Ryall case) made specific findings with respect to the authority of Southold Town and the SEQRA review of this case. In short, the Judge Costello's decision simply accepted SCWA's independent, uncoordinated, Type II SEQRA designation for the overall project, but made it clear that the Town might well move on its own to further evaluate the project, given the Court's realization that the Trustee's had not yet reviewed the overall project and the Town's possible desire not to expand its water map. In making its case to support an expanded opportunity for SEQRA review before the judge, Assistant Town Attorney Andaloro told the Court that: "The Town Board of Trustees has discovered additional portions of this transmission line fall within its jurisdiction. We have requested that the Suffolk County Water Authority come back before them to review the additional portions that are within their jurisdiction, and if they do not, the Trustees reserve the right to revote the administrative permit that was issued." "Other than that, the town has not taken a position with respect to SEQRA review by the Water Authority. They did an uncoordinated review, and should our Board of Trustees determine that what the portions of the pipeline, in addition to Dam Pond as to what they already reviewed, they may decide to do SEQRA, but they don't have that before them at this time": [See Exhibit A, Page 28, Lines 5-20] More importantly, in Judge Costello's final decision, he stated: 5 50 Post Cnr lbevs GRP FOR THE EAST END "Now, if the town —and it appears that the Town is taking another look at this, whether it is a first look or second look or expanded look, they have authority also in this area. The issues that are being raised by residents or the Town Board or the Town Trustees are not before this Court. They may be at a future point in time It may very well be that the town might decide that they are not going to change their water distribution map, and they are not going to allow certain actions necessary to extend this line without another look..... and possibly change the project to require further studies but that is not before me at this time." (See Exhibit A, Page 34,Lines 5-20) In sum, the Town's position before the Court(arguing in support of the Trustee's ability to further review the proposal pursuant to SEQRA)and the Court's decision(indicating that the Town still had the authority to take a second look and possibly change, question or deny the project) are in direct conflict with the public position taken by the SCWA that the Type II designation for any and all aspects off this project are forever set in stone. The findings of the Court also severely contradict the stated position of Assistant Town Attorney Hulst at the recent public hearing on this matter. The Board of Trustee's needs to recall that Ms. Hulst is on the record arguing that the Court decided all aspects of that SEQRA compliance for the application. She subsequently used this argument as the basis for her stiff direction to the Trustees that they should impose of a severe limit on the amount of public testimony that would be taken regarding environmental review. In our view, it is critical that the Trustees reconsider the SEQRA guidance offered by SCWA and publicly endorsed by Ms. Hulst, in light of the actual testimony of Deputy Town Attorney Andeloro before Judge Costello and Judge Costello's own findings on the matter. Given that this project represents one of the largest infrastructure proposals ever contemplated by the Town Trustees, the necessity of a complete environmental review is paramount to the goals of public disclosure, the legal mandates of SEQRA, and to the Trustee's own ability to make the most informed, responsible and defensible position for people of Southold Town. In our view,the subject 17,200- liner foot water main proposal presently before the Trustees (as presented in wetlands application of 6/25/10) should be defined as a new and separate action, with its own permit application. As such, the SEQRA process should begin anew. The prior administrative permit clearly dealt only with a minor segment of the overall action (that was more than some 16,000 feet smaller than the overall area of interest). Moreover, all prior SEQRA consideration by the Town Trustees and SCWA was given without the benefit of a coordinated review process, which entitles each agency to make its own 6 s0 P.M Wmhoo Fines � GR-fUP � FOR THT END subsequent SEQRA determination (a fact that is articulated by rules governing SEQRA and embodied in the findings of Judge Costello in the Ryall case). In the end analysis, it would seem highly imprudent to justify the review of some 16,000 additional linear feet of water main extension(that could according to the SCWA eventually serve up to 700 properties), which will create a material policy conflict with the duly-adopted water supply policy of the Southold Town Board, as a mere amendment to an administrative permit for a 600 feet of directional drilling beneath Dam Pond. Clearly there is far more going on here than a routine directional drilling, and it falls to the Town Trustees to recognize and examine the short- and long-term implications of this proposed pipeline installation from both a wetlands and a community planning standpoint. VI. Requirine a DEIS In light of SEQRA's mandate for strict procedural compliance, it is imperative that the Town Trustees recall the very low threshold that is required for a DEIS. In fact, according to the implementing regulations: "To require an EIS for proposed action, the lead agency must determine that the action MAY include THE POTENTIAL for AT LEAST ONE significant adverse environmental impact"(emphasis added) [NYCRR: 617.7(a)(1)] As a result, the Town Trustees need only identify one potentially significant impact to require the preparation of a DEIS and in this case there are many. In addition, SEQRA directs agencies to look well beyond the narrow limits of a single permit authority. Rather the law directs agencies to also consider broader community planning criteria as indicators of potential significant adverse impacts, including: "the creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted" [NYCRR: 617.7(c)(1) (iv.)]— such as the conflict between the Town's Board's recent rejection of a water supply map amendment for Orient. "the impairment of the character or quality of important historical, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character," [NYCRR: 617.7(c)(1) (v.)] —such as the potential for additional growth in the historic hamlet of Orient associated with the increased availability of water. "a substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space, or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses" [NYCRR: 617.7(c)(1) (viii.)] —such as the potential for growth inducement along several hundred acres of undeveloped agricultural land that will have immediate access to the new water main should it be installed. 7 50"«Po,t Consumer/_i0'i1 R3mbpo Fibcrs GR U FOR THE EAST END "two or more related actions undertaken,funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria in this subdivision"[NYCRR: 617.7(c)(1) (xiii.)] —such as the combined effect of the 600 feet of directional drilling under dam pond taken in consideration with the completion of the 17,200 feet of water main and its associated long term usage and expansion throughout the hamlet of Orient. These are but a few of the many impact criteria that have been established in the implementing rules for SEQRA, which underscore SEQRA's mandate for a comprehensive assessment of major projects, such as the proposed water main to Orient that will fundamentally transform Orient's water supply system for future. Along with any perceived benefits, clearly there are important planning issues that must be examined and subject to the disclosure and comment that can be provided through the preparation of a DEIS. VII. Adequacy of the Environmental Assessment Form As the Trustee's are no doubt aware, SEQRA is both a procedural and substantive law designed to take a hard and comprehensive look at the environmental consequences of actions approved, funded or undertaken by government agencies. The consequences of potential actions are also to be considered in light of potential mitigation measures intended to minimize impacts, and reasonable alternatives to actions proposed for approval. A. The Environmental Assessment Form-Part I The first step in achieving substantive compliance with SEQRA is for agencies and the public to have current and accurate information upon which an orderly and comprehensive decision about the potential significance of any action can be made. Based on the information discussed above, we take the position that the proposed action should be subject to a full SEQRA review and that this review should be supported by a current accurate, signed and verified EAF. We note that the EAF submitted by the SCWA, and referred to in its letter of transmittal was not signed by a responsible agency official or by the preparer(Exhibit F). We understand that the EAF was part of wider narrative prepared by an outside consultant, but SEQRA requires that the preparer, and an official of the approving agency who is responsible for Part II of the document be held accountable for the content of any EAF, and for good reason. The Trustees will also recall that the SCWA offered these two documents from the Town Board's file on the water map amendment as a way to support its own position that there would be no significant impact from the project. While the documents may lend support to SCWA's position, they do so based on a number of errors and inaccuracies contained in the EAF. In support of our position, we ask the Trustees to consider the following statements taken directly from the EAF for this project. 8 10 ,Post Qmeumed50`.,13,-boo Fibers G l� U P � FOR THE EAST END Question #13: Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? EAF Response: NO Comment: Anyone who has ever crossed the Orient Causeway on a regular basis can attest to the fact that vehicles are frequently parked along the north and south sides of the causeway for fishing, clamming, swimming, kayaking, bird watching, photography, star gazing and other recreational activities associated with the public use of Dam Pond and its surrounding environment. These uses generally exist along the entire shoulder of NYS Rte. 25 (north and south), up to the westerly boundary of Truman Beach. Moreover the specific path of the pipeline lies directly in the middle of one of the most widely recognized, well marked, bike lanes on the North Fork. This expanded roadway shoulder is used for biking, walking and other passive recreational activities throughout the year, and this is the precise area that will directly impacted during the open trench phases of pipeline installation. To suggest that this area is not well used for public recreation is highly inaccurate. Question #23: Total anticipated water usage per day? EAF Response: Unknown Comment: It seems extraordinary that the EAF does not provide a relative volume of water for a major public water proposal that is specifically designed to deliver metered water service to a defined geographic area. Clearly, the short- and long—term consequences of this project are significantly related to the amount of water available, the anticipated rates of flow, and the related volumes of discharges of that flow into the shallow aquifers of Orient. Question #25: Approvals Required (Section of the EAF that identifies involved agencies) Comment: The EAF fails to note that the subject action requires any local approval from the Town Trustees, despite the fact that the SCWA has already secured at least one permit and has been directed to submit another full wetlands permit to the Trustees. Comment: The EAF fails to note that the subject action also required approval from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC). Question #25: Approvals Required (continued) Zoning and Planning Information (pages 8-10) Comment: In response to the question of whether or not the proposed action requires any planning or zoning decision the EAF responds NO. Ironically, the EAF itself was apparently filled out as part of the Southold Town Board's Water Map amendment hearing, which would certainly qualify as a substantive planning decision by the Town. Notably,the EAF provides a suitable check-off box for"other" planning and zoning requirements(such as the water map amendment). 9 s0 Poet Consumer/091.Bamboo Fibers G R. U P � FOR THE EAST END Section C. Zoning and Planning Approvals Question #6: Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans: EAF Response: YES Comment: The EAF states that the proposed water main extension is consistent with the Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy and the Orient Hamlet Study. Whatever the Water Supply Management and Protection Strategy may have said, the recent unanimous vote of the Town Board to reject the water line extension sets current policy for the direction of water supply in Southold Town. At a minimum, the EAF needs to be updated to reflect this decision, which is directly applicable to the subject action. Moreover, based on a review of the recommendations of the Orient Hamlet study posted on the Town's website it is unclear how the proposed water line would be supported by the general recommendations of the Hamlet Study. The EAF should explain the specific recommendations that demonstrate consistency with the pipeline proposal. Question #10: Will proposed action require any authorizations for the formation of new water or sewer districts? EAF Response: NO Comment: While the extension of a 17,200 foot water main into an area where no prior service existed my technically not form a new water district based on the SCWA's definition, clearly the proposal will provide new service connections to more than 100 properties and any reasonable assessment of this action should note that situation in the Environmental Assessment (which specifically provides a space for further elaboration). Ignoring the fundamental opportunity to define the extent of a major water project in a category specifically designed to address such issues is imprudent if not outright irresponsible. Verification (page 10) Comment: The EAF provides that its preparer be identified and that a signature and title of the person responsible for the information be affixed to the final EAF. For the subject EAF both the name of the person responsible for the information (and the verification of its truth) are left blank in both signature and title lines. The lack of such signature and assignment of responsibility completely undermines the value of the EAF to an informed and transparent review process. B. Environmental Assessment Form Part II The EAF Part II is intended to help a lead agency assess the overall significance of a particular action in terns of the size, magnitude and capacity for mitigation. As is the case with the Part I of the EAF for this proposal,the EAF Part II also seems lacking in its objective assessment of potential impacts of the proposed water main extension. Question 1: Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? EAF Response: NO 10 ,O',Po.t C on..wnee/;0',Bamboo Fib... G RtEEAST P UFOR T END Question 1: (Examples provided as representative criteria of potential impacts) [Will there be] construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet? EAF Response: left blank Comment: The EAF Part II asserts that no physical change to the associated environment will take place, despite the fact that several miles of ditching, roadwork, repaving and pipe installation will be introduced in very close proximity to surface waters. The author of the EAF also failed to note the possibility of any construction in areas where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet(a very likely situation along the causeway). Question 5: Will the Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality EAF Response: NO Question 5: (Examples provided as representative criteria of potential impacts) JWill there be] water usage in excess of 20,000 per day? Response: left blank [Does the] proposed action require water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons/minute? EAF Response: left blank Comment: The EAF Part II asserts no groundwater affects, despite the fact that several related questions deal with the source of water and the amount of water that will be involved in the proposed system. For example, the EAF does not answer the question as to whether or not the project will result in water usage of 20,000 gallons per day, when its clear that the proposed transmission line (serving Browns Hills and those directly along the path of the pipeline) could exceed 20,000 gallons per day by the time it served 65-70 properties. Similarly, its very likely that the SCWA's supply wells would meet or exceed the 45 gallons/minute threshold noted on the EAF Part Il, but if the preparer simply states that there will be no affect and thus avoid addressing the other subordinate questions. Unfortunately, this does not provide decision makers with the most through assessment. Question 20: Is there or is there likely to be public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? EAF Response: NO Comment: There may be no better example of the inaccuracy of the EAF on file for this project than the response to Question 20. Clearly, by the time this document was prepared on April 20, 2010, there had been months over very high profile public controversy over this proposal. Virtually every local news media outlet had covered the issue on several occasions and residents throughout Orient and surrounding communities had made their concerns well known to elected officials from the local to the federal level. Residents have written letters of opposition by the dozens if not hundreds, testified before involved agencies, held public meetings, and negotiated directly with Town and agency officials for months. Even if there had been no public controversy at the time that this EAF was prepared, the level of public discord over this application has only increased since April 2010, and must be reflected as such in any EAF used to evaluate this proposal before the Town Trustees. 11 90 Nort C nnsunna/50 Hamboo Fibers R P �G U FORTH@ EAST END VIII. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on our evaluation of available public materials associated with the review of the subject application, we believe this proposal raises significant questions regarding the long-term protection and proper management of Southold Town's vital wetlands resources. We do not believe the Board of Trustees can answer these questions without further investigation. We find the scale and magnitude of this action, its potential range of community planning and environmental consequences, and the level of community and Town Board opposition, all to be sufficient and defensible reasons to support the requirement of a DEIS through a renewed SEQRA review process. We strongly disagree with the stated position of Trustees counsel on this matter. Through these comments we believe we have provided sufficient evidence to support the case for a new SEQRA review and a new public hearing on this matter that will allow the public to openly provide comment on the potential impact of the overall action. We object to numerous statements and omissions provided in the unsigned EAF, and request that a new and complete EAF be prepared as part of the continued review of this project. In the end, the subject action is far more than the administrative proposal that came before you in 2009. As we have all come to better understand the extent of this project and the potential implications of its installation, we believe the case for a DEIS is more than sufficient to justify the need for a positive declaration. In the end, a DEIS simply represents the most comprehensive level of environmental review that can be afforded a given project. Considering all the questions, points of view, permanence, and public funding involved with this proposal, we believe all parties will be best served by embarking on a complete and transparent review. Thank you for the opportunity to share our concerns. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. We greatly appreciate your commitment to serve the people of Southold Town and the challenges that come along with this responsibility. Sincerely, Robert S. DeLuca President Exhibits A-F 12 30'.Post Uomumur/30"..Namboo Piben • . Group for the East End Public Comments Regarding Wetlands Application Of The Suffolk County Water Authority For Water Main Extension East Marion to Browns Hills August 3, 2010 Exhibits — A — F • • 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK // 1i 2 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK CIVIL TERM PART IAS 27 i�`7 ©A 3 ---------------------------------------X 4 WILLIAM S. RYALL and BARRY BERGDOLL; LUCY BARNES; CATHERINE CHAUDHURI; 5 ANN FFOLLIOTT; JUDITH and PAUL FRIED; JANE FRIESEN and EDWARD MANNING; 6 JESSE and ELIZABETH GORDON; THOMAS MORGAN and MARY FOSTER-MORGAN and 7 WALTER STROHMEYER, Petitioners, Ind. No. 8 0946594 -against- 9 ORAL ARGUMENT 10 For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, 11 12 -against- ( 13 SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY; TOWN OF SOUTHOLD; and BOARD OF 14 TRUSTEES OF TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 15 Respondents. ---------------------------------------X 16 i 17 April 28, 2010 i 18 Suffolk Supreme Court One Court Street 19 Riverhead, New York 11901 20 B E F 0 R E 21 HONORABLE RALPH F. COSTELLO JUSTICE 22 23 24 25 EILEEN CREIGHTON, RPR, CSR Official Court Reporter 1 2 3 4 5 A P P E A R A N C E S 6 I 7 For the Plaintiff: k r 8 SIVE PAGET & RIESEL ' Attorneys for Petitioners 9 460 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 10 BY: STEVEN BARSHOV, ESQ. 11 12 For the Defendant: 13 SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY GENERAL COUNSEL 14 4060 Sunrise Highway Oakdale, New York 11769 15 BY: TIMOTHY J. HOPKINS, ESQ. 16 17 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY COUNSEL FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD & 18 SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES 53095 Rte. 25 19 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 20 BY: JENNIFER ANDALORO, ESQ. 21 22 23 I 24 25 I Proceedings 3 1 COURT CLERK: The matter before the Court is 2 William S. Ryall and Barry Bergdoll; Lucy Barnes; 3 Catherine Chaudhuri; Ann ffolliott; Judith and Paul 4 Fried; Jane Friesen and Edward Manning; Jessie and 5 Elizabeth Gordon; Thomas Morgan and Mary Foster-Morgan 6 and Walter Strohmeyer, petitioners, for a Judgment 7 Pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and 8 Rules against Suffolk County Water Authority, Town of 9 Southold; and Board of Trustees of Town of Southold. i 10 May we have counsels' appearance for the 11 record. 12 MR. BARSHOV: Your Honor, Steven Barshov, 13 Sive Paget & Riesel for the petitioners. 14 MR. HOPKINS: Your Honor, Timothy J Hopkins, 15 General Counsel Suffolk County Water Authority. 16 MS. ANDALORO: Good morning, your Honor. 17 Jennifer Andaloro Assistant Town Attorney, 18 Town of Southold on behalf of the Town and the Board of 19 Trustees. 20 THE COURT: Thank you. 21 Mr. Barshov, it is your application. 22 MR. BARSHOV: Thank you, your Honor. 23 I appreciate the opportunity to have oral 24 argument in the courtroom, Judge. My clients, in 25 particular, appreciate that very much. • • I Proceedings 4 1 THE COURT: I understand that they are here 2 in the courtroom, and it is good that every one is here 3 to hear the arguments, and we will proceed at this 4 time. 5 MR. BARSHOV: Your Honor, the Article 78 j f 6 petition seeks to overturn approvals by the Suffolk I 7 County Water Authority that would authorize the 8 extension of a 12-inch water main for, approximately, 9 3 miles through lands that are, in part, substantially I 10 undeveloped, and are agricultural and unprotected, and 11 would eventually terminate at the Browns Hill 12 subdivision where there are, approximately, 25 homes. 13 Those facts are not disputed. 14 It is also not disputed that the size water 15 main is 12 inches and would have the potential to 16 serve, approximately, 1,000 homes. 17 It is also not disputed that at public 18 hearing recently, the Suffolk County Water Authority 19 representatives indicated that their rates for 20 determining how people would be charged would be based 21 on, approximately, 700 users for this water line. 22 So it is clear from the path of the water 23 line; from its size and from the words of the Suffolk 24 County Water Authority itself, that this is not solely 25 for the purpose of bringing water into the Browns Hills Proceedings 5 h 1 subdivision, which only has 25 units. 2 THE COURT: You are not suggesting that the 3 Water Authority should charge these 25 people what they 4 would, otherwise, normally charge 700 people? f 5 MR. BARSHOV: No, your Honor. I'm not here 6 to articulate the basis for them -- their rates or how 7 they charge. I'm only indicating that their statements 8 regarding the number of units that this would be spread 9 over, clearly demonstrates that they contemplate that 10 this water line will be used by more than the 25 people I 11 in the Browns Hills subdivision; that is the point we 12 are making. �• 13 Your Honor, the significance of this is that 14 when an agency proposes an action, such as extension of 15 a water line, it has to determine whether or not it is i 16 going to -- or how it is going to comply with the t. 17 New York State Environmental Quality Review Act. i 18 The Suffolk County Water Authority determined 19 that this is what they denominated as a Type II Action 20 under SEQRA, in which they say as a result of such a 21 designation, they need not do an environmental 22 assessment or prepare an environmental impact 23 statement. 24 Our contention in the petition is that that 25 would be a correct conclusion if the only purpose for • • 1 Proceedings 6 1 the extension of the water line would be to serve 2 existing development; it is not. The line canes in and 3 there are lands which could be developed and, indeed, 4 could be induced to be developed as a result of the 5 presence of this water line. 6 The town itself and its town board members 7 have acknowledged that the presence of water via a 8 public water main, does have the potential to induce 9 growth, and we cited, your Honor, in our papers two C I 10 examples of that. One example that we gave was from a 11 presentation or a statement made by counsel member Al 12 Krupski, who said that he recalled -- and he is a town 13 board member. He recalled subdivisions in which many 14 small lots could not be developed because of 15 insufficient distance between wells and septic systems 16 on those properties. once the public water came in, he 17 said, all those lots got developed. 18 The point that he is making, Judge, is that 19 there are requirements under the sanitary code that 20 require separation of septic systems from wells, so the 21 zoning does not always determine what the amount of 22 development can be; indeed, there can be lesser amounts 23 of development than would be authorized under the 24 zoning because wells and septic systems have to be 25 separated by a certain distance. And when public water I Proceedings 7 1 comes in, there is no need for such a separation I 2 because they are not using the wells anymore. 3 So if the argument is made, as I suspect that 4 it will be, by counsel for the Water Authority, that i f 5 just because there is zoning in place, growth cannot be 6 induced, that is simply factually incorrect. 7 THE COURT: Are your people afraid that there 8 will be houses so closely packed together in Orient? 9 MR. BARSHOV: My people, your Honor, are 10 concerned that a water line will come in without any 11 study whatsoever of its potential impacts. Part of the 12 potential impacts is induced growth. They don't have a 13 specific fear about houses being packed in, per se. 14 What they are saying is you can't just bring in a water 15 line like this without studying it, if it has the 16 potential to induce growth. i 17 It is the study itself that will determine 18 whether or not there is a danger; whether or not there 19 is a significant impact. We don't prejudge that. All 20 that the lead agency is supposed to do is identify if 21 there may be; not will be, if there may be a single, 22 one, single potential significant adverse impact. If 23 that very, very, very low threshold is met, then they 24 must prepare an environmental impact statement. 25 Many environmental impact statements at the I • • it Proceedings g t 1 end of the day conclude that there will be no impacts 2 that are significant or adverse; that could be an 3 outcome here. It doesn't mean that because that is a 4 possible outcome, that they get to short circuit the 5 process, erroneously designate this as a Type II 6 Action, avoid having to even prepare an environmental j I 7 assessment and never prepare an environmental impact i 8 statement; that is what they are asking this Court to 9 sanction. 10 And indeed, your Honor, there is yet another 11 example that I would give to the Court which was also 12 from a town board member, and this town board member, I 13 believe, was the supervisor, and he stated -- this is 14 Supervisor Russell at a February 23, 2010 public work 15 session, I wouldn't have an application for 160 16 condominiums in Cutchogue, were it not for the 17 availability of public water, so it certainly opens up 18 doors. Fisherman's Beach in Cutchogue wouldn't have 19 gone from these little seasonal cottages to these 3,000 20 square foot monstrosities, absent the presence of 21 water. It happens. 22 Now, that is something that also presumably 23 is allowed by zoning. 24 The point is that when public water comes in, 25 it has the potential to cause property owners to Proceedings 9 i 1 convert land from agricultural to residential; from 2 cottages to more intense residential development, and 3 these are the potential environmental impacts that need 4 to be analyzed. 5 Also, your Honor, we are not the only ones to r 6 have this observation. The New York State Department 7 of Environmental Conservation promulgated a SEQRA 8 handbook which provides guidance to all lead agencies 9 around the state, and it explicitly states, as we 10 indicated in our papers, that in the event that a water 11 line or other utility line is extended into 12 agricultural areas, that it does have the potential to 13 induced growth, and that that potential needs to be 14 considered in determining whether or not it is a Type 15 II Action. I 16 THE COURT: Isn't this water line going into I 17 an existing subdivision, development of homes? i 18 lit. BARSHOV: Your Honor, it terminates at an 19 existing subdivision, but it traverses lands that are 20 undeveloped; that are either adjacent to it or 21 proximate to it. 22 THE COURT: Is there any area of that area of 23 Southhold from where the water lines are now located oc ted 24 out to Orient that there aren't open farmlands? 25 MR. BARSHOV: Sorry, your Honor. I didn't i Proceedings 10 1 understand your question. 2 THE COURT: How much of that area is 3 undeveloped? 4 MR. BARSHOV: In percentage of -- 5 THE COURT: From going out to Orient, how 6 much of that North Fork area from where the line will 7 start and extend out to this Browns Hills Development? 8 MR. BARSHOV: We have identified your Honor, 9 as approximately 250 acres of unprotected, undeveloped 10 lands that could be developed; changed from 11 agricultural or vacant status to be residentially 12 developed. (. . 13 I don't know what the percentage is in 14 comparison to the overall amount of acreage in Orient, 15 but I do know that there is a very substantial amount 16 of acreage that is immediately proximate to this water 17 line, and that, of course, does not include other 18 portions of Orient, if the Water Authority chooses to 19 attempt to extend this line further. 20 Now, your Honor, another point that needs to 21 be made is that there is no basis in the record for the 22 Water Authority's determination that this is properly a 23 Type Two. They made no findings. They did not 24 indicate any documents that they had considered. They r 25 did not issue any kind of memorandum or something that Proceedings 11 i 1 expresses their logic as to why it is that this should 2 be considered a Type II Action, and why it should fall 3 within the Type II list, as opposed to following the 4 guidance of the SEQRA handbook that would provide that I 5 in the event that there is induced growth, that at 6 least one must determine whether or not it is properly 7 classified as a Type Two. 8 And indeed, your Honor, I would point the 9 Court to the case that actually the Water Authority 10 brought to the Court's attention because it happens to 4 11 support our claims, and that case is Hazen versus How, 12 which we cite in our papers. And there, this is what 13 the Court stated as to the importance of such a 14 rational and I am reading, your Honor, from the 15 decision of the Third Department. "There may be a need 16 to document the rational for this initial 17 determination. " 18 The determination, your Honor, they are 19 referring to is whether or not something is Type II. 20 "There may be a need to document the rational for this 21 initial determination in order to facilitate judicial 22 review. When it is not manifestly clear that the 23 activity involved meets the criteria defining a 24 particular class of Type II actions, and a more i 25 detailed preliminary inquiry may also be necessary when I Proceedings 12 1 an administratively predetermined Type II 2 classification conflicts with a competing environmental 3 impact. " 4 What the Court is saying, your Honor, is that 5 the Type II list is not to be read mechanistically, 6 mechanically, in a way that defies examination of the 7 surrounding facts and circumstances. This is a 8 determination -- I 9 THE COURT: Just note the date of that 10 decision. { 11 MR. BARSHOV: Sure, your Honor, I will give 12 you the cite. It's 625 New York Sup 2nd 670, and it is �. 13 the Third Department 1995. 14 THE COURT: Thank you. 15 Continue. 16 MR. BARSHOV: And, your Honor, what the Court 17 is stating to both lower courts, as well as to 18 administrative agencies acting as lead agencies under 19 SEQRA, is that this is not a mechanistic process. You 20 have to look at the overall facts and circumstances, 21 and if there is a competing environmental interest, 22 such as induced growth, then it is incumbent upon the 23 lead agency to state its rational so that this Court 24 can know why and how it is that it made its i 25 determination; this record is barren. Proceedings 13 r 1 There is absolutely nothing whatsoever from 2 the Suffolk County Water Authority that provides any j 3 incite into its rational. And that is the reason, your 4 Honor, that after the fact; after the litigation was E 5 commenced, after the papers were filed, indeed, after 6 its Answer was filed, there was a resolution that the 7 Suffolk County Water Authority passed that purportedly 8 clarified their initial approval of this project to 9 say, now, after the fact, we designate this to be a 10 "transmission line" to which no one could hookup, other 11 than existing water users. 12 And the Suffolk Department of Health Services 13 has recently issued a report in which they state that 14 that is unlawful; that it actually violates the 15 sanitary code. 16 So we have the Suffolk County Water Authority 17 attempting, after the administrative record is closed, 18 to adopt a resolution that purportedly clarifies what 19 it did in the first instance, convenient that the 20 clarification occurs after the litigation was 21 commenced, and the very clarification that they sought 22 in order to prevent their being induced growth has now 23 been criticized, directly and explicitly by another 24 Suffolk County agency, saying no, you can't do that. r 25 You can't designate a transmission line and prevent t Proceedings 14 1 people from hooking up. 2 The question is squarely presented, your 3 Honor, to you, as to whether or not they properly 4 inquired and documented their decision; provided a 5 rational, or did they do what we believe they did? h 6 Which is they were concerned about getting federal 7 stimulus money, and they put this thing together in the h 8 way they needed to to show that there .would be no 9 environmental impact that needed to be addressed; no i 10 analysis that could be done so that they can show that 11 this was shovel ready. That was the requirement that 12 they had to get the Federal stimulus money. �. 13 In our judgment, Judge, that is what guided 14 this; not a genuine inquiry into the facts; not an 15 actual examination of where induced growth can occur 16 and to what degree and how much and an articulated 17 basis set forth for their decision. This was driven by 18 the fact that they wanted money, and they needed to go 19 through that process in that way. 20 THE COURT: Counselor, tell me about New York 21 Code Rules and Regulations 617.5 discussing Type II 22 Actions, especially the list under Subdivision C and 23 Nine and Eleven. 24 MR. BARSHOV: Judge, I believe because I 25 don't have a photographic memory for the numbers, but I Proceedings 15 i 1 believe what you are referring to is the Type II Action i 2 designations that would refer to the extension of 3 utility lines. 4 THE COURT: Right. 5 MR. BARSHOV: Those, your Honor, provide Type 6 II designation when the extension of the utility line 7 is to render service in an approved subdivision. 8 THE COURT: Is this an approved subdivision? € 9 MR. BARSHOV: What? Browns Hills? 10 THE COURT: Yes. 11 MR. BARSHOV: Yes, sir, it is. 12 THE COURT: Is the proposal to extend this 13 line into Browns Hills to provide clean water service 14 to that community? 15 MR. BARSHOV: That is what it would do, in 16 part, your Honor. 17 THE COURT: Isn't it a fact that the wells in 18 that area are contaminated? 19 MR. BARSHOV: That is my understanding, 20 Judge. 21 Now, the point, Judge, that we are making, 22 and we have never challenged, by the way, so there 23 should be no inference before this Court, we are not 24 challenging the public purpose behind extending the i 25 water line. No one has contended that there isn't I Proceedings 16 1 contaminated water out there. People who live in the 2 area may agree or disagree as to whether they want the 3 Water Authority to extend the line. 4 There is, by the way, a significant i 5 divergence of opinion even within people within 6 Browns Hills subdivision as to whether or not they 7 actually want this water line or not. 8 THE COURT: Your clients aren't the only 9 people that are living there? j 10 MR. BARSHOV: Of course not, Judge. 11 Absolutely. I'm just saying that there is a difference 12 of opinion. Some favor; some oppose. But the point 13 that I'm making, Judge, is that this Type II Action 14 list applies to this circumstance, and in the event 15 that this were all that this action would be, which 16 would be solely to extend water to a subdivision, so, 17 for example, suppose there is a line that ends here, I 18 and we have to extend the line 100 yards or 200 yards 19 to get to an approved subdivision, then -- and there is 20 no other intervening lands that could be developed. 21 All that it is to extend water service to an approved 22 subdivision, of course it is appropriate to Type II 23 that, but when you have 3 miles of intervening lands, 24 you have undeveloped lands that abut this, one cannot 25 ignore; no one can ignore. It is not allowed under i Proceedings 17 1 SEQRA to simply ignore that there could be a potential 2 induced growth that would arise from this. 3 We are not saying that it would be bad, 9 inherently. We are not even saying that it is definite 5 that there is an adverse environmental impact. We do 6 not have to establish that. 7 All we have to say is that there may be a 8 single potential significant adverse impact arising 9 from induced growth, and if that is the case, then this 10 does not fall within the list and citation that 11 your Honor referred to because it is not the only thing 12 that would be occurring; extending water service to an 13 approved subdivision. 19 THE COURT: If you want to wind it up, I 15 have -- 16 MR. BARSHOV: I do, your Honor. 17 I just have a few more points to make, if I 18 may. 19 THE COURT: Keep it tight. i have two other 20 attorneys to hear. 21 MR. BARSHOV: I appreciate that. 22 THE COURT: And i have other matters that I 23 have to proceed with this morning. 29 MR. BARSHOV: Your Honor, I will do so. i 25 I want, your Honor, please to also focus on • j Proceedings 18 1 1 the fact that the town has acted -- sorry -- I just 2 want to point out one thing first, your Honor, before 3 we leave the SCWA, we do need to talk about the town. 4 The SCWA adopted two resolutions in January 5 of this year: One was this attempted retroactive 6 transmission line; the other was to say that they were 7 going to now study the impacts associated with a water 8 plan. 9 THE COURT: You are adding issues to this 10 case -- 11 MR. BARSHOV: I will move on. 12 THE COURT: -- that I don't have before we, 13 and no one has had an opportunity to respond to. 14 MR. BARSHOV: I will move on, Judge. 15 THE COURT: I don't where a lot of these 16 quotes are coming from, whether they are from 17 newspapers -- 18 MR. BARSHOV: They are in our papers. They 19 are documented. They are referenced. They are in our 20 papers, your Honor. 21 Recently, your Honor, the Suffolk County 22 Water Authority reversed its position that it would not 23 apply for a water supply map amendment, and they did 24 apply to the town board to amend its water supply map 1 25 in order to authorize this very extension of the water Proceedings i9 i 1 line to Browns Hills subdivision. 2 THE COURT: That is not before me, is it? 3 MR. BARSHOV: It is, Judge. This is part of 4 what has happened in this case. There is all sorts of 5 references in opposing counsels' papers to these 6 subsequent actions that occurred. 7 THE COURT: I will hear from the town about h 8 that. 9 MR. BARSHOV: But I want to point out simply f 10 to your Honor is that that application was denied. k 11 And, indeed, the town issued a letter to the Water 12 Authority that is dated April 22, so this just 13 happened. 14 And in this letter, not only does it 15 indicate, your Honor, that they denied the approval, 16 but it also indicates that the Water Authority has not 17 complied with the environmental conservation law; that 18 they have split apart the approvals into separate 19 groups. They have not applied for all of the approvals 20 that are required. 21 THE COURT: Does the town have the authority 22 to stop the water line from being laid through the 23 area? 24 MR. BARSHOV: Your Honor, there is apparently 25 a disagreement between the town and the Water Authority 0 0 Proceedings 20 1 about that. The Water Authority has stated at the i 2 public hearing that it need not go to the town. It can 3 ignore the town's denial of the water supply map 4 amendment; proceed on its own and, in deed, it said it 5 would proceed on its own, even in the absence of r 6 Federal funding. i 7 THE COURT: And the town can stop the Water 8 Authority by coming to court and arguing that point, 9 whether it has the ability to stop the Water Authority. 10 MR. BARSHOV: Yes, your Honor, it could. 11 And the point that I'm making -- i 12 THE COURT: But I'm not going to deal with 13 that today. 14 MR. BARSHOV: The point, Judge, that I'm 15 making is that the town board and the town counsel have 16 communicated to the Water Authority that their position i 17 is that the Water Authority has violated SEQRA. i 18 THE COURT: Fine. 19 MR. BARSHOV: And we concur, your Honor. 20 THE COURT: I would think so. 21 MR. BARSHOV: I would think that you would 22 think so, as well, Judge. 23 The final points, Judge, that I will make 24 because I know that you have to hear from the other l 25 counsel, is that my clients are not coming before this i Proceedings 21 1 Court to halt development. I know that has been a 2 concern of your Honor' s. 3 The pleadings that we proffer to the Court, 4 which indicate their interests in the community, are 5 there to establish standing. They are not there to say 6 that we have sought relief; we are prohibiting all 7 development; we are asking for the Court to enjoin 8 development; that is not the case. 9 Every individual petitioner has to 10 demonstrate an interest different from that of the 11 general public in order to have standing before this 12 Court, and that is the reason why those statements are 13 made in our amended petition. 14 The prayer for relief that we have is a very 15 simple one: Just make the water -- it is not a big 16 deal. Just make them go back and properly assess this. 17 And they have said that they will go forward without 18 the Federal funds. This is not a question where this 19 Court has to feel that by granting this petition, that 20 all of a sudden, something vital to the Water Authority 21 or to the public is going to be gone; indeed, if that 22 were the case, the town board would not have voted to 23 turn down the water supply map amendment. They knew 24 what the consequences of their action was. 1 25 So what we are saying to this Court is that • • Proceedings 22 1 your Honor doesn't have to feel that there are 2 extraneous consequences to this. What we are asking 3 for is to hold the Water Authority to its word; that 4 they would go forward with this project regardless, and 5 to require them simply to comply with the environmental 6 quality review act; nothing more. 7 Go back; designate this as an unlisted 8 action, which it properly should be classified as, 9 because of the induced growth potential; prepare an 10 environmental assessment. If that environmental 11 assessment shows from their expert, their environmental 12 experts, no potential significant adverse impact, they 13 will issue a negative declaration, and they will 14 proceed on their way. 15 If somebody wants to challenge that, then 16 they will have to come back to this Court, but what 17 they don't get to do is they don't get to simply say, 18 we think that the end of this -- end of the analysis is 19 that there will be no environmental impacts, and, 20 therefore, preclude the necessity of the study in the 21 first instance. They have to do the study, at least an 22 environmental assessment, so that some court at some 23 point can determine whether or not there really is a 24 logical basis for a negative declaration. They have to 25 take a hard look. They have not done that, as of yet. Proceedings 23 1 THE COURT: Thank you. 2 For the Water Authority. 3 [fit. HOPKINS: Thank you, your Honor. 4 Your Honor, the petitioners want to try to control land i 5 use in Orient by controlling the availability of safe 6 water supplies. This is contrary to state law 7 governing land use; it is contrary to state law 8 regarding public health, and it is contrary to state I 9 law regarding state environmental review processes. 10 State law provides that it is the Town of 11 Southold, not the Suffolk County Water Authority, that 12 has jurisdiction over land use in Orient through the 1 13 enactment of zoning laws and regulations. The town has 14 already adopted such zoning laws. 15 If the petitioners seek to change zoning laws 16 in Orient, they must petition the Town of Southold to 17 change them. State law does not contemplate, sanction 18 or authorize the control of land use through the denial 19 of clean drinking water supplies to existing residents. 20 The Suffolk County Department of Health 21 services, in its pesticide contamination detection 22 report, which is attached to the Suffolk County Water 23 Authority papers as Exhibit F states: "Reliance on 24 private drinking water wells in agricultural areas 25 should be discouraged. An increased effort to extend Proceedings 24 1 public water supplies to areas containing the most 2 heavily contaminated private wells is needed. " 3 Orient is one of the last areas in Suffolk 4 County with pesticide levels above state and Federal 5 maximum contaminant levels that does not have access to 6 a safe and adequate water supply from a public water I 7 supplier. This is borne out by the fact that the 8 Suffolk County Department of Health Services has 9 designated Orient as a public water supply priority 10 area. 11 Finally, your Honor, the State Environmental 12 Quality Review Regulations regarding the extension of 13 water mains to existing subdivisions is crystal clear. 14 The extension of utility distribution facilities, 15 including water, to render service in existing 16 subdivisions, is a Type II Action, as a matter of law. 17 The New York State Department of 18 Environmental Conservation, New York State Department 19 of Health, New York State Environmental Facilities 20 Corporation, Suffolk County Water Authority and the 21 Town of Southold, have all determined that the proposed 22 project, the transmission line to the Browns Hills 23 subdivision is a Type II Action. 24 Even the Governor of the State of New York 1 25 has certified that the project is a Type II Action. Proceedings 25 1 The petitioners claim that they simply seek to compel 2 the Suffolk County Water Authority to fulfill 3 obligations under SEQRA rings untrue. Those claims are 4 nothing but bunk. 5 The petitioners can cite no case law, no 6 statute, no rule or regulation that requires an 7 environmental assessment form to be filled out for this 8 project, let alone an environmental impact statement; �4 9 instead, they rely on a single bullet point and the I 10 outdated and obsolete SEQRA handbook to support their 11 arguments. 12 This bullet point was rendered obsolete with 13 the DEC's adoption of a new statewide SEQRA Type II 14 list in 1996 that provided the extension of utility i 15 distribution facilities, including water, to render 16 service in existing. subdivisions to be a Type II 17 Action. 18 The petitioners have argued that the Suffolk 19 County Water Authority did not make a sufficient 20 finding of fact in the record prior to designating the 21 proposed project as a Type II Action; that is simply 22 wrong, your Honor. 23 Exhibit J of the Suffolk County Water I , 24 Authority's submission, is a memorandum detailing the 25 reasons why the action is a Type II Action. The same I I Proceedings 26 f 1 analysis was performed for several other projects; many 2 of which are in the Town of Southold. 3 The same analysis is performed every time the 4 Suffolk County Water Authority gets funding from an I 5 outside source to extend water mains. 6 The petitioners made reference earlier to the 7 case of Hazon versus How, and they cited 625 New York f 8 Sup 2nd 670, a decision rendered by the Third 9 Department after being transferred by the Second 10 Department. 11 That case held that, indeed, the suggestion 12 that a determination regarding a Type II Action must be 13 annulled because the agency failed to make an explicit 14 finding that a project was a Type II Action, must be 15 rejected. 16 The Court in that case said "To require an 17 explicit individualized assessment of every project as 18 petitioners would have it, would eliminate the benefits 19 that emanate from the compilation of the Type II list 20 under SEQRA." I 21 In that case, the Court ruled in favor of the 22 agency, and that the action that they were trying to 23 perform in that particular matter was a Type II Action. 24 They said that they didn't have to make any specific 25 determination whatsoever. i i Proceedings 27 I f 1 In our particular case, the Suffolk County 2 Water Authority did make such a determination, so did 3 the Environmental Facilities Corporation, The 4 Department of Health, the DEC, and the Governor of the k 5 State of New York. 6 For all these reasons, your Honor, and for 7 the reasons set forth in our papers, the Suffolk County 8 Water Authority respectfully asks this Court for a 9 judgment dismissing the petition. 10 Thank you, your Honor. 11 THE COURT: On behalf of the town. 12 MS. ANDAIARO: Good morning, your Honor. 13 Before you, with respect to the town, is a Board of 14 Trustees administrative permit issued for the direction 15 of drilling of a portion of this pipe underneath Dam 16 Pond; that is the limited scope of the permit that was 17 before the trustees. 18 The only plans that were given to the Board 19 of Trustees were plans showing the direction of 20 drilling under Dam Pond. They never received any plans 21 showing the extent of the pipeline. 22 Based upon the information that was before 23 the Board of Trustees, they considered it as an 24 administrative permit; it underwent administrative i 25 permit review, and as the town Board of Trustees has Proceedings 28 1 done on many occasions with cases of directional 2 drilling, they issued the administrative permit, 3 without doing a SEQRA review, as such is their practice 4 and as such that has been done. 5 With respect to -- more recently, the town I 6 Board of Trustees has discovered additional portions of 7 this transmission line fall within its jurisdiction. 8 We have requested that the Suffolk County Water 9 Authority come back before them to review the 10 additional portions that are within their jurisdiction, 11 and if they do not, the trustees reserve the right to 12 revote the administrative permit that was issued. �._ 13 Other than that, the town has not taken a 14 position with respect to the SEQRA review by the Water 15 Authority. They did an uncoordinated review, and 16 should our Board of Trustees determine that what the 17 portions of the pipeline in addition to Dam Pond as to 18 what they already reviewed, they may decide to do 19 SEQRA, but they don't have that before them at this 20 time. 21 So that is all I have to say. 22 THE COURT: The Board of Trustees, or the 23 town? 24 MS. ANDALORO: Well, the Town of Southold -- i � 25 THE COURT: The town would undergo a study. Proceedings 29 I 1 MS. ANDALORO: Not necessarily. i 2 They would look at the project as a whole. 3 They would look at the Dam Pond directional drilling, 4 as well as the other portions of the transmission line 5 that are before it. r 6 If they feel that it is an unlisted action i 7 that would require -- that would have an adverse I 8 impact, they could very well say this requires an 9 environmental impact review, or they could Type II it, 10 just as the Suffolk County Water Authority has done, or 11 they could negdeg (phonetic) it, if they decided it is 12 an unlisted action; unfortunately, none of those issues r 13 have been before them at this time. 14 THE COURT: That is it? 15 MS. ANDALORO: Yes. 16 Any questions? 17 THE COURT: No. No. 18 MR. BARSHOV: Your Honor, I just want to 19 correct the record on two matters. It will take me 20 less than a minute. 21 First, the Town of Southold, in connection 22 with its water supply map amendment application for the 23 Suffolk County Water Authority did not Type II this. 24 They deemed this to be -- and we are talking about the I 25 very action that was -- is proposed, which is the i Proceedings 30 1 extension of the water line. 2 They deemed that to be an unlisted action and 3 prepared an environmental assessment. It wasn't 4 released because they voted it down, so already we have j f 5 a conflict between the town board and the Water 6 Authority. Water Authority saying it is Type II; town i 7 board saying it is not Type II already. 8 Secondly, regarding Exhibit J, which 9 counsel -- 10 THE COURT: I don't have control over that 11 argument yet, if it will ever will come before me, 12 between the Town and the Water Authority for the 13 changing permits or require additional permits or a 14 study. 15 MR. SARSHOV: I'm not talking about that. 16 I'm talking about the fact that the Suffolk County 17 Water Authority applied for a map amendment to the 18 water supply map for this water line extension, and the 19 town board of the Town of Southold did not Type II 20 this. The same action that the Water Authority Type 21 II; they did not. They said it was unlisted, and they 22 prepared an environmental assessment. And I'm sure 23 that counsel will verify that, your Honor, if you ask 24 her. 25 Regarding Exhibit J, where counsel points to I Proceedings 31 1 this as the locus of the analysis that purports to 2 justify the conclusion that they reached, I want you 3 please, Judge, to look at Exhibit J, and because it 4 won't take you very long. All that it is is a series 5 of the exact same interoffice memorandum repeated by 6 wrote over and over again. 7 Here is a project. Here is a certain number 8 of units or distance of the water line. And here is 9 their conclusion that it is Type II. No analysis, no 10 discussion of the facts: Nothing. It is -- there is 11 literally no analysis in there. 12 THE COURT: Isn't this the way that they have 13 done this in the past? This is the process that has 14 been developed within the walls of the Suffolk County 15 Water Authority dealing with such extensions? 16 MR. BARSHOV: Absolutely, Judge. 17 The only thing that I wouldn't want you to 18 think is that that process includes, demonstrates and 19 reflects an actual analysis. Is it their knee jerk 20 reaction that they extend a water line; it is Type II? 21 Absolutely. They do this as a matter of course. They 22 just don't think about it, and they, certainly, didn't 23 think about it in this case. 24 THE COURT: You are saying that they didn't i 25 think about it. I don't see evidence that they didn't Proceedings 32 1 think about it. There are several memos from people i 2 within the Water Authority dealing with this question. 3 MR. BARSHOV: Exhibit J, Judge, is exactly 4 what I have described. It is just a series of the same 4 5 memo over and over again. It is a conclusory memo. It f 6 just says here is the reference project. How many 7 linear feet of water main to existing residential 8 customers. Project is identified as a Type II Action; 9 quotes the regulation, and that is it. There is no 10 analysis. 11 THE COURT: Thank you. f 12 MR. BARSHOV: There is no reference as to �. 13 could it induce growth and so on. 14 THE COURT: Miss Andaloro, do you have any 15 response? 16 MS. ANDALORO: With respect to the town board 17 review of the water map? 18 THE COURT: Yes. 19 MS. ANDALORO: The town board has a process 20 in place. It has a water map in place, which has, for 21 years, provided the landscape of where public water 22 will and will not go within the Town of Southold. 23 As a matter of course and practice, they -- 24 any action to amend that map is an unlisted action 25 under the SEQRA regulations because it doesn't define I Proceedings 33 1 an amendment to a water map as a Type II, so that is 2 why they considered it an unlisted action, and they do 3 so every time they review a proposed water map 4 amendment. 5 THE COURT: I have enough. 6 Bottom line here is that the state made 7 certain pronouncements in 1996 when these amendments 8 under New York Code Rules and Regulations 617.5 came 9 into effect. 10 It says clearly that: "The following actions 11 are not subject to review under this part: Extension 12 of utility distribution facilities, including water 13 connections to render service in approved 14 subdivisions. " 15 This is an extension of water service to an 16 approved subdivision. And the rules and regulations 17 give the Suffolk County Water Authority the power to I 18 make such decisions, and, specifically, describes the 19 action that the Water Authority is proposing here, an 20 extension of a water main into an area that isn't, 21 otherwise, served by a water main to render service I 22 in an approved subdivision. 23 The Court is not here to overrule the state 24 regulations, the considerations and actions taken by 25 the state, the executive or the legislative branch of I Proceedings 34 i 1 the government; that is not our roll. This is, i 2 specifically, allowed, the action taken by the Water 3 Authority, and is, specifically, described. We are not 4 going to step in and change the rules and regulations. 5 Now, if the town -- and it appears that the 6 town is taking a look at this, whether it is a first 7 look or second look or an expanded look, they have 8 authority also in this area. The issues that are being is 9 raised there by residents or the town board or the town 10 trustees are not before this Court. They may be at a 11 future point in time. 12 It may very well be that the town might 13 decide that they are not going to change their water 14 distribution map, and they are not going to allow 15 certain actions necessary to extend this line without 16 taking another look. i 17 And I hesitate to use the word hard look. It 18 is a term of art, but a look at this project and 19 possibly change the project to require further studies, 20 but that is not before me at this time. All I can deal 21 with is what is. 22 And, basically, what is is whether or not the 23 Suffolk County Water Authority took action beyond its 24 authority, and I say no. They didn't exceed their i 25 authority; that is a denial of Motion Sequence 004. Proceedings 35 1 There was another motion before the Court 2 involving submission of sureplies; that is rendered -- 3 the Court declares that as moot. 4 I'm not going to reach that. We didn't use 5 the sureply or the additional materials submitted by 6 the petitioner with respect to that sureply; that is 7 the judgment of the Court. IIII 8 Order the minutes. I will so order the 9 minutes; that is it for that petition. i 10 MR. HOPKINS: Thank you, your Honor. 11 12 13 14 CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE AND ACCURATE TRANSCRIPT OF THE 15 ABOVEMENTIONED TRANSCRIPT 16 17 Cx EILEEN CREIGHTON RP , CSR 18 SENIOR COURT REPORTER 19 20 21 SO ORDERED: 22 23 JWN.RALPH F. COSTEI„[,Q.. )Old RALPH F. COSTELLO 24 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 25 I Exhibit A a _ s- omacc izmge Emr 8m=® a� MARTIN D. FINNEGANN • TOWN ATTORNEY SCO TA. RRUSSELL martin.lihilkgah@town.southold.ny.us of Svc Su Ty0 pervisor JENNOE11,AN OR ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY Town Hall Annex,54375 Route 25 AT �jennifer.andeloro@town.southold.ny.us P.O. Box 1179Q Southold,New York 11971-0969 LOyj M.11ULSE ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEYTelephone(631) 765-1939 lori.huIhd@town.southold. a �C� ' Facaimlle(631) 766-6639 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 22, 2010 D EC E � p� II t. Stephen M. Jones, Chief Executive Officer JUN 2 5 2010 D ttftblk County Water Authority 60,Sunrise Highway Southho Town ld Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 Board of Trustees RE: Board of Trustees/Adminlstrative Permit for Directional Drilling Beneath Dam Pond Dear Mr. Jones: As I trust you are aware, the Town Board declined to adopt the proposed local law amending the Town's Water Supply Map pending the adoption of the Town's updated Comprehensive Plan and the submission by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) of proof of the demand for public water by the residents of Orient. As such, the Town of Southold maintains that the installation of any portion of the water main is prohibited at this time in accordance with the long standing and well established agreement by the SCWA to defer to the Town's authorization of any water main extensions. 1Mth respect to other required approvals, although the Board of Trustees issued the SCWA an administrative permit in July 2009 for the Authority to undertake directional drilling under Dam Pond, it has come to the attention of the Board of Trustees through Public disclosures made in connection with the Town Board's consideration of an amendment to the Town's Water Map that additional approvals may be required from the Board of Trustees. it is clear that certain sections of the proposed water transmission n main extension between Dam Pond and Browns Hills are withi the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees and, since the administrative permit was granted for the limited scope of work entailing the directional drilling under Dam Pond, any installation contemplated beyond the Dam Pond area will require a Wetlands Permit pursuant to Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. We are also advised that the permits previously issued by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and the Army Corps of Engineers are likewise limited to the directional drilling under Dam Pond. As I am sure you would agree, it is inappropriate and contrary to the mandates of the Environmental Conservation Law and related regulations to obtain permits for a proposed action in a piecemeal fashion. We would respectfully request that the SCWA • • Mr. Stephen M. Jones April 22, 2010 Page 2 review the existing permits, to the extent they are valid, and amend your application to the Board of Trustees so that the requisite review of the entire action can proceed. Please be advised that no further action should be taken with respect to the proposed water main extension until all required approvals are obtained and the Water Supply Map is formally amended by the adoption of a local law by the Town Board. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. b truly rs, rtln D. FI egan To ey MDt°!Ik / cc: Timothy J. Hopkins, Esq.✓ Members of the Town Board Members of the Board of Trustees Mr. Damon Rallis, Zoning Inspector Ms. Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Exhibit B James F. King,President ��Of soulyo Town Hall Annex Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President ,�O 54375 Main Road Peggy A Dickerson P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen sgy� Bob Ghosio,Jr. Telephone(631) 765-1892 !� c(f,311 78� 5-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEESIR JUN . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Permit No.: 7129A snuchhuia Town Date of Receipt of Application: June 18, 2009 Board of Trustees Applicant: Suffolk County Water Authority SCTMN: NIA Project Location: Route 25, East Marion, over Dam Pond Channel Date of Resolutionllssuance: July 22, 2009 Date of Expiration: July 22, 2011 Reviewed by: Board of Trustees Protect Description: For the installation of a 12" HDPE water main for the purpose of supplying drinking water and fire protection to the residents of East Marion residing east of Dam Pond channel. The grass area on the road's edge will contain all work pertaining to directional drilling (staging and receiving). The staging and receiving permits are to be approximately 300' east and west of the centerline. Depth of drill will be approximately 10' under the channel bottom. Hay bales and silt screen are to be installed to contain sediment laden run off. All excavation to be backfilled, stabilized and returned to the original condition. Excess fill to be removed and disposed of legally. Findings: The project meets all the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The Issuance of an Administrative Permit allows for the operations as indicated on the site plan prepared by Suffolk County Water Authority last dated June 16, 2009, and received on June 18, 2009. Social Conditions: None. Inspections: Hay bale line with silt fencing inspection &final inspection. If the proposed activities do not meet the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, a Wetland Permit will be required. This is not a determination from any other agency. v rKiJames ng, President Board of Trustees JFK:eac Exhibit C Town of Southold Board of Trustees Application Office Use Only (� Coastal Erosion Permit Application [ID E `� "M E Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit D _AmendmenUfrans er xtension &ecefvedApplicatfon: /O JUN 2 5 2010 Received Fee:$Mr _;;;Completed Application LZ) _Incomplete Southhold Town _SEQRA Classification: Board of Trustees Type I Type II_Unlisted_ Coordination:(date sent) ✓LWRP Consistency A ment Form a- iz _ CAC Referral Sent: ,GDate of Inspection: I lb _Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: _41u-blic Hearing Held: Resolution: NameofApplicant Suffolk County Water Authority Address 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769 Phone Number:( ) 631-563-0236 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- n/a see enclosed mpps Property Location: see enclosed maps (provide LILCO Pole#,distance to cross streets,and location) AGENT: n/a (If applicable) Address: Phone: • • Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): n/a, approximately 17,200 linear feet Area Zoning: n/a Previous use of property: state roadway with electric..and gas utilities Intended use of property: state roadway with electric, gas, and water utilities Covenants and Restrictions: Yes X No If"Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date see enclosed letter and permits No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): see enclosed letter, maps, EAF, permits, etc. • • Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: installation of water transmission main Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If Yes,how much material will be excavated? 517.40(cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: 10 entry/receiving pits will be used for three directional drills; all excavations will be backfilled and restored to original condition; silt screens and hay bales will be used around entry/receiving pits and etween station 38+ 60 and 46 + 70 as per enclosed plans. Approximately 820t feet of grass/dirt shoulder will be excavated using open trenching, which will be back- filted and restored as well. Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) Now negative impacts are anticipated. See enclosed EAF for full analysis. • 0 Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: installation of water tranmission main Area of wetlands on lot: n/a square feet Percent coverage of lot: n/a % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet see enclosed maps and photos Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet see enclosed maps and photos Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? 517.40 cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: as per roadbed Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: 10 entry/receiving pits will be used for three directional drills; all excavations wi 1 be backfilled and restored to original condition; silt screens and hay bales will be used around entry/receiving pits and between station an as per enc ose pans. pproximately 820± feet of grass/dirt shoulder will be excavated using open trenching, which will be back- ftiied—and restored a Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): No negative environments impacts are anticipated There will be no impact on any wetland or tidal waters of the Town as a result of the project. Exhibit D SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Timothy J. Hopkins Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway,Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 General Counsel (631)563-0236 Fax(631)563-0370 June 25, 2010 po Jill Doherty, President Town of SoutholdBoard of Trustees Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Dear Ms. Doherty: On April 22, 2010, the Southold Town Attorney sent a letter to the Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA) with respect to the above referenced project staring the following: With respect to required approvals, although the Board of Trustees issued to the SCWA an administrative permit in July 2009 for the Authority to undertake directional drilling under Dam Pond, it has come to the attention of the Board of Trustees through public disclosures made in connection with the Town Board's consideration of an amendment to the Town's Water Map that additional approvals may be required from the Board of Trustees. It is clear that certain sections of the proposed water transmission main extension between Dam Pond and Browns Hills are within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees and, since the administrative permit was granted for the limited scope of work entailing the directional drilling under Dam Pond, any installation contemplated beyond the Dam Pond area will require a Wetlands Permit pursuant to Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The letter went on to request that the SCWA amend its application to the Board of Trustees so that the requisite review of the entire action can proceed. A copy of the letter is enclosed for June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road(NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 2 your convenience. Since January 2001, the Town of Southold indicated that the no direct application for a wetlands permit need be made by the SCWA for water main projects that do not include directional drilling under a water body. The procedure was to simply have the highway department review the SCWA plans for road opening permits, and based upon those plans and meetings in the field and/or information provided by the SCWA line-up inspector,the highway department would advise the Board of Trustees and either accept or reject the SCWA proposal for erosion control (haybales/silt screens). A copy of a SCWA Memorandum regarding this procedure is enclosed. That procedure has been followed by the SCWA and the Town since that time. In any event, in accordance with Mr. Finnegan's request and in the spirit of cooperation and coordination and to facilitate the provision of badly needed public water supplies to residents of the Town of Southold along the route of the proposed water main and to improve drinking water quality in the Browns Hills subdivision, please consider this an amendment of the application to the Board of Trustees regarding the above referenced application. The SCWA also respectfully reserves its legal rights with respect to this application and the issue of jurisdiction over the project by the Board of Trustees. As you are probably aware,the SCWA and the Board of Trustees has already treated this project as a Type R action under SEQR because it involves the extension of utility distribution facilities to an existing subdivision as per the statewide SEQR Type II list. An Article 78 proceeding challenging this determination was dismissed affirming the determination that the project is a Type II action. You may not be aware of the fact that the Southold Town Board had an outside consultant prepare a SEQR long environmental assessment form for this project prior to the court decision. A copy of the same is enclosed for your reference. The Long EAF prepared for the Town Board includes an analysis of potential impacts related to the construction of the transmission main in an area of potentially regulated freshwater/tidal wetlands and flood plains at page 9. Part 2 of the Long EAF at page 12 of 21 indicates that the transmission main will not affect any water body designated as protected. Part 3 of the Long EAF concludes: The proposed action would not result in any new development. June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road(NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 3 The availability of public water will not, in and of itself, alter development patterns or result in increased density. Further, based upon the information provided regarding water quality in the shallow groundwater which is the sole drinking water source for the community it is expected that the proposed action and availability for connections by existing dwellings in the vicinity will result in significant public health, safety and welfare benefits. Also enclosed is a copy of the Plans for the Extension of Water Main on Main Road (NYS Route 25) East Marion/Orient,New York dated June 17, 2009(hereinafter"Plans"). These Plans indicate the entire route of the proposed water main. Please note that the directional drill under Dam Pond starts on page C-4 at distance 21+50 and ends on page C-5 at distance 26+00. This is the portion of the project for which the Board of Trustees has already issued an administrative permit. The Plans show two additional directional drills identified as Alternative Drill #1 and Alternative Drill #2. Instead of open cutting the roadbed near wetland areas, the SCWA will be installing additional portions of the water main utilizing the alternative directional drill method. This is the same installation method that was approved by the Board of Trustees for the section of the main going under Dam Pond. Alternative Drill#1 starts on page C-5 at distance 26+00, which is the location where the Dam Pond directional drill ended. Alternative Drill#1 ends on page C-6 at location 38+60. Alternative Drill #2 starts on page C-7 at location 46+70 and ends on page C-13 at location 85+50. Alternative Drill #1 and#2 will be exclusively within the roadbed and will not go under any water bodies. Also enclosed are other permits for the project for your reference. First, there is a letter from the US Army Corps of Engineers indicating that the project may be performed under the nationwide permit. The Army Corps of Engineers has indicated that it does not have jurisdiction over the portion of the project located in the road right of way. Second, there is a copy of the permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation("DEC")for the Dam Pond portion of the project. Third, there is a copy of the SCWA's DEC general permit for the project. The DEC general permit applies to the installation of water mains within existing roadways and within five feet of the roadway shoulder June 25, 2010 Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Re: Extension of Water Main on Main Road(NYS Route 25) East Marion to Brown Hills Road, Orient Page 4 near fresh and tidal wetlands. All of the proposed project falls within this definition with the exception of the Dam Pond directional drill portion of the project(which received a separate DEC permit as noted above). When the SCWA has a project falling under its DEC general permit,the SCWA sends a letter notifying the DEC. The notification includes project location maps and photographs of the site and adjacent wetlands. Enclosed is a copy of the maps and photographs that were sent to the DEC for this project in accordance with the SCWA's DEC general permit. Fourth, there is a copy of the New York State Department of Transportation Highway Work Permit for the project. Fifth,there is a copy of a letter from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation which indicates that the proposed project will have no adverse effect on historic or cultural resources eligible for listing or listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Sixth, enclosed for you convenience is a copy of the Administrative Permit that was issued for the Dam Pond portion of the project by the Board of Trustees on July 22, 2009. In addition to the above referenced documents,please find a Town of Southold Board of Trustees Application, including General Data, Coastal Erosion Application Data, Wetlands/Trustee Lands Application Data, Applicant/Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, and Erosion, Sedimentation&Storm- Water Run-Off Assessment Form. Should you need any additional information,please let me know. Very fly Y urs, Timothy J. p ns Enclosures (three copies of each) Exhibit E o� A§Z3 =:_a PMOa J J 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet Flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑✓ Part 1 ❑✓ Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑� A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Transmission Main Extension for Browns Hills Subdivision Name of Action Town Board of the Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Scott Russell Town Supervisor Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) April 20,2010 website Date Page 1 of 21 • • PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Transmission Main Extension for Browns Hills Subdivision Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) Main Road from Dam Pond Bridge,east to Browns Hills Road,north to existing water main location. Name of Applicant/Sponsor Town of Southold Town Board Address 53095 Main Road City/PO Southold State NY Zip Code 11971 Business Telephone Name of Owner(if different) N/A Address City I PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: The Town Board is considering adoption of a Local Law which would amend the Town of Southold Water Supply Plan Map to include the extension of a water transmission main to the Browns Hills Subdivision. Historically,the Water Supply Plan Map reflects the physical changes in the water supply network since 2000.The Suffolk County Water Authority and Suffolk County Department of Health Services have represented to the Town that the groundwater quality of existing wells supplying the Browns Hills area are inadequate and pose a significant concern that requires the extension of public water to the area.The extension of the transmission main is intended to supply existing development only and is not intended to result in additional development pressure in the area. Page 2 of 21 • • Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ✓❑Agriculture ✓❑Other vacant land 2. Total acreage of project area: 3,826 acres. Area of town east of the Dam Pond Bridge in East Marion(including Orient&Orient Point) APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24.25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres (No changes in developed state from proposed action) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Carver-Plymouth-Riverhead Association&Haven-Riverhead Association a. Soil drainage: ❑✓ Well drained 100%of site ❑Moderately well drained_% of site. ❑Poorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). N/A 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes ❑ No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: N/A ❑0-10%_°k 1310- 15%_% 1:115%or greater_% 6. Is project substantiall contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes ❑ No N/A 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ❑No N/A 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) Variable g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑� Yes ❑ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ❑No Page 3 of 21 • • 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? 0Yes ❑No N/A According to: -F - --I Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? 0 Yes ❑ No Describe: Coastal area,narrow area of land which is improved w/Main Road which has surface water on both sides 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes F!1 No (proposed action to occur following roads) If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [Eyes ❑No Views of agricultural uses,Orient Harbor,Long Island Sound 15. Stteams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Dam Pond,wetlands associated with Orient Harbor,Gardiner's Bay,Long Island Sound b. Size(in acres): N/A Page 4 of 21 Come—city water supply is isolated from the SCWA system. Purpose is to extend SCWA System to replace existing water 17, Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes No supply. a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 21 Yes ©No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ElYes No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ❑NO N/A-main will follow existing roads. 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? El Yessubstantially 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ®Yes El No B. Project Description N/A 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: acres. N/A b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. N/A c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. N/A d. Length of project, in miles: +/-3.4 (if appropriate) (extension of transmission main) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. _% N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? N/A h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A;No additional homes will result from proposed action. One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?_ 17,763 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards. N/A 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ElYes ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Road restoration(to occur daily) b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No N/A c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No N/A 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes ID No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: f3 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ® Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes [H] No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction after project is complete NIA 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ❑� No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑D No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes IF]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ENo If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes E No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No C. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ©Yes E No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes ❑� No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ®Yes IDNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes El No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. N/A UTotal anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.Unlmown 24 Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Eyes ❑ No If yes, explain: SCWA has been awarded$1.9 million in Federal Stimulus funding through the NYS Drinking Water Revolving Fund. Page 7 of 21 • • 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date Water Supply Plan City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes No Map Amendment City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department ❑Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No State Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 • • 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? R-40, R-80,R-200,HD,HB,M I t 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Build out indicates under current zoning,an addition 187 homes could be built. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? (availability of public water) [No changes in zoning proposed,however,availability of public water would decrease minimum lot size. Requirement for esidences in the Marine Business Zone from 40,000 SF per residence,to 20,000 SF per residence. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? If public water were extended to Orient Point,several lots would have potential for additional residential lots,up to 11. However,this is a worst case analysis since public water would need to be extended at least 2.3 miles and some lots are constrained further with split zoning. 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes ❑No Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy&Orient Hamlet Study. 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y4 mile radius of proposed action? Vacant land,residential,small business,marina&agricultural use. R-40,R-80,HD,HB,B zoning districts. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? ❑i Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 • . 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ® Yes El No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑Yes ID No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑ No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes❑M No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Town Board of the Town of Southol Date April 20,2010 Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 • • PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact.If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO YES ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ❑ ❑ Yes []No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ❑ ❑ ® Yes ❑No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ ® Yes []No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) BNO ID YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No L I Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) IDNO 13 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ❑ ❑ Yes No body- Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposal within an existing roadway adjacent to wetlands for+/-3,500.. 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ENO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ ❑Yes No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ []Yes []No area. Other impacts: Yes []No Page 12 of 21 0 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? IDNO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ® ® ® ❑ • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Yes No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ® ® ❑Yes ❑No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ® ❑ • Proposed Action would change flood water flows Yes 0No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No floodway. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ❑. NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any Yes 0No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than i ton ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5lbs.per hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? El NO El YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Yes No Federal list,using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ® ❑ ❑Yes [:]No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ❑ ❑ ®Yes ❑No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ❑ © ®Yes ❑No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields, pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No acres of agricultural land or,if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary,use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) E]NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? El NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? ❑NO ❑YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ []Yes []No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 17 of 21 _ r 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ID NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ []Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑. NO [-]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%increase in the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ❑ ❑ []Yes []No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors,noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No Paae 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ElNO []YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hazardous substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" ® ® ❑Yes ❑No in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous,highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [--]No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No LAction will provide safe drinking water for at least 24 homes whose water supply currently does not meet NYS drinking standards. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? El NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community ❑ ❑ —]Yes [:]No (e.g.schools,police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 20. Is there,or is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? El NO EYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. WA Instructions(If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is Important. To answer the question of importance,consider: •The probability of the impact occurring •The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility,including permanently lost resources of value •Whether the impact can or will be controlled •The regional consequence of the impact •Its potential divergence from local needs and goals •Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 ' Exhibit F omgd zf-a %;UO o Em)o gwzo R? J J Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: maryannlib85@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:36 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com; info@orientwater.info Subject: Fwd: MAL/Lette2STBoardOfTrustees/08-04-10 Dear Ms. Standish, Please forward the following to all the members of the Southold Town Board of Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's (SCWA) application for a wetlands permit for a"transmission" line from East Marion, under Dam Pond, across The Causeway to Browns' Hills. Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties)at the Federal, State, County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. The Trustees should consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. You risk undermining your own credibility as a Board Member, and the credibility of Southold Town and it's ancient institution in which you serve. If SCWA's permit application is approved, you also risk me and my Orient neighbors joining with the Southold Town Board in whatever action they may choose to take against you all. Sincerely, MaryAnn Liberatore 8/5/2010 Page I of I Standish Lauren C,, . _ 4 7019 � From: jedwood@aol.com Sent: Tuesday,August 03,2010 6:36 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov;info@odentwater.info; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Marc@marcalessi.com Subject: SCWA and the permit issue TO: Southold Town Trustees FIR: Jeri Woodhouse RE: SCWA wetlands permit application As former chair of the Southold Town Planning Board, past board member of two environmental organizations, and resident of the hamlet of Orient I am writing on behalf of myself and my husband John to urge you to deny the permit application of the SCWA for a wetlands permit for a transmission line from East Marion to Browns Hills. I am very familiar with the history of this application and the controversy that it has generated.At one point during my tenure on the PB I scrutinized all of the water-related reports and correspondence between the town and the various agencies involved (SCDH,SCWA,etc)as background for a proposal to create an overlay protection zone to protect the fragile water supply in Orient. It was stated succinctly in reports and letters that there would be no water mains installed to bring water to Orient and there would be no amendments to the towns water map in the future to pipe public water to Orient. Not only was I interested in the water situation as a planner but as a homeowner who got our water from the wells on our property. It has been erroneously reported that we don't want public water in Orient and this is not true at all. Everyone wants(and has the right to have)access to clean, safe water. But the issues go far beyond whether or not my clothes get stains on them or my hair turns green. We are surrounded by a delicate aqua/eco/system containing fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries,bird conservation areas,wildlife, vegetation and natural habitat areas.The causeway that leads me home is highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.Our fragile fresh water aquifer is surrounded by salt water and that balance could easily be upset putting all of the existing wells at risk. I could continue to list the potential devastating effects of salt water intrusion etc.,etc. -but surely you know all of this. The decison you make with respect to SCWA's application will have substantial consequences. If you grant the permit application AT THIS TIME and without adequate protections and safeguards in place there is no turning back. It is not always easy to stand up and say"no"-it takes fortitude and courage.And if not you as our trustees-then who? I have sat on the LWRP committee with some of you-and this application before you does not have the approval of the Local Waterfron Revitalization Program. It does not have the support of our Conservation Advisory Council.The Southold Town Board unanimously rejected a water supply map amendment.Our respected environmental organizations do not support this proposal.And the overwhelming majority of Orient residents do not support it,as you well know. Meeting with SCWA has become a farce,at best. It is almost inconceivable to me that with all the evidence and opposition this proposal has against it that it has gotten so far- and that any semblance of truth concerning the nature and scope of this project has(excuse the pun)gone down the drain. I implore you to restore our faith and our trust in government. I implore you to stand up as our TRUSTEES and protect our wetlands,our water supply and our future. I implore you to act with courage and conviction and say no to the issuance of a permit to allow the transmission line at this time. Respectfully submitted, Jeri Woodhouse 2395 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Norah Bischoff[nborient@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 5:22 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Orient Water We believe the Suffolk Count Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line from East Marion to Browns Hills, should be rejected wholeheartedly for the following reasons: It will adversely affect the Wetlands of the Town and it will adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wild life and vegetation. The Causeway wall has seriously been breached and The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. The problem has not been resolved as yet. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway - under and through the wetlands.The question is when a hurricane hits - what will be the impact on our water supply ? We know that the environmental assessment SCWA is using in its application - must be approved by the Town in the form of the Water Supply Map amendment. As you know, Southold Town Board 'rejected' this unanimously. It mystifies us why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town. We found out that there is insufficient demand for this water supply in Orient. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time ( by the way isn't this number less than the 40% SCWA demands with its other projects????). Also, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households (which seems to meet the 40% criteria) have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time." We also have learned that this project does not have the approval of the Local Waterfront Revitalizaion Program nor does it have the support of the Conservation Advisory Council (CAC). It seems pretty clear to the residents in Orient that SCWA's application for a Wetlands permit is disingenuous and arrogant without any consideration to the households it will truly affect in Orient. It should and must be rejected by you, our Trustees, who are responsible for the protection of our wetlands and our fragile water supply. Sincerely, Norah Bischoff lane Winsch r-- August 5,2010 8/5/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: ks11957@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 6:00 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Orient Water Dear Trustees- It is beyond comprehension that the Board would even consider the SCWxs request for a wetlands permit so that they SCWA could continue with their water main project. The vast majority of Orient residents do not want this water main and yet SCWA persists in not even following their own 40% rule. In my opinion SCWA is more interested in pumping water out of Orient then in providing water to the Brown Hills. Please do not allow this to happen to our community. Do not allow SCWA to continue with their water main project. Sincerely, Mr. Mrs. Taz Smith year round residence of Orient 1725 Village Lane Orient, N.Y. 11957 t 8/5/2010 Standish, Lauren From: Ellen McNeilly [ejmcneilly@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 6:15 PM ;j r,.. To: Standish, Lauren c Dear Trustees: '------ I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water, Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From, East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12, THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO, PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS, WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly, susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The, Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies, need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it, crosses the causeway —under and through wetlands. The question is not: Will, there be a hurricane? But: when will there be a hurricane?, The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly, because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. , Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird, conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. , could be, devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of, fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in, additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt, water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh, water wells of the 90 to 95% of Orient residents not hooked up to the, pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the, aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents -- to the, benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for, water. , Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or, Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect, the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE, PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. , J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about, the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. , As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, segmentation, is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to, Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring, public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the, pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way, to Orient Point, throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. , The 50 — 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more, development in Orient — at denser levels than current zoning permits. That, in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are, by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. , Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible, has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains, a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we, can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. , Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and, at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to, get in. 1 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY, MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even, considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big, question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO, ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?, SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of, the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly, opposed to the pipeline. , Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the, pipeline at this time. , More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households have, already signed a petition, that says "Not at this time", Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a "80% majority" are disingenuous at best, and mathematically ridiculous. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT, REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) , OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad, faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have, apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of, the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health, justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. , We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as, you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent, political process. Thank you. Ellen MCNeilly 2 Pagel of 3 1 Standish, Lauren From: John and Nina Winter bohnandnina@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:12 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com, Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com Subject: Orient Water Dear Trustees, I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane? But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer,a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine)upsets this balance, raises the water table,and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh)putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer,and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS 8/4/2010 Page 2 of 3 •SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2,Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly,dose to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad 8/4/2010 Page 3 of 3 ?aith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant,erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA,as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Sincerely, John and Nina Winter Orient 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Group for Cutchogue [cutchogroup@gmail.coml Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:12 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Where will the waste water go? For distribution to the Southold Town Trustees in connection with the public hearing on the proposed SCWA pipeline to Orient Where will the waste water go? Judicial notice is a doctrine of the law of evidence by which civil and criminal courts recognize and accept facts without requiring proof and without permitting presentation of evidence or argument to the contrary. Judicial notice applies to simple, obvious facts. Judicial notice is the legal translation of the concept of common sense. It is common sense, and we can take judicial notice, that increasing a supply of potable water increases the demand for sewage treatment. The SCWA proposal to construct a potable water pipeline to Browns Hills is only half of the story. It is a peremptory condition that provisions for sewage treatment should preceed provision of potable water. Cutchogue Group www.savecutchogue.com neighbors a�savecutchogue.com 8/4/2010 Page I of I Standish, Lauren From: FISHERPOP@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:36 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -water pipe line-Message is from an unknown sender Board members, please no pipe line into Orient. Our wells are sufficient. Clyde and Roxanna Mellinger, 1495 Village Lane, Orient. 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 3 ti Standish, Lauren From: Standish, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:42 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: FW: Proposed Pipeline r -----Original Message---- From: Russell, Scott Sent: Wednesday, August Au 04 2010 8:36 AM' 9 To: Standish Jeff Subject: FW: Proposed Pipeline Y From: Jocelyn Ozolins [mailto:jozl@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 7:48 AM To: klavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott Subject: Proposed Pipeline Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like 8/4/2010 Page 2 of 3 r chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table,and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh)putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents--to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village,our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J.ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributors to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2,Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no,despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" 8/4/2010 Page 3 of 3 Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D.THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant,erroneous understandings about the scope of the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served,and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Jocelyn Ozolins Orient, NY August 4,2010 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: John Stewart pohnnan@knology.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:45 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] -Orient Water Line -Message is iroman unknown gender August 4, 2010 Dear Trustees: You may have seen my letter in the most recent edition of The Suffolk Times (July 29). Even though we are not year-round residents of Orient, our family has been in Orient every year since 1938. My wife, Nancy, and I own the home at 595 Navy Street that was built by my parents. For many years my mother, Winifred L. Stewart, and my aunt, Jane L. Hady, were among Orient's most active citizens when they were full-time residents. Our commitment to Orient, along with our deep affection, is reflected in our Tennessee auto license plates: ORIENT and ORIENT2. We are strongly opposed to construction of the water line for a number of reasons. We are deeply concerned for its impact on Dam Pond and the causeway, along with the adjacent wetlands. This is a highly fragile strip of land that must not be disrupted by a main water line. Construction impacts will be severe and the continuing danger of the line's rupture in this fragile environment will be with us permanently. No need for the line has been demonstrated. No requests from the overwhelming majority of citizens have been forthcoming. Quite the contrary, there has been an overwhelming outcry against construction. I do not pretend to be an expert on the application of Federal and State environmental compliance regulations. But I am impressed by the concerns that have been raised by persons who are very familiar with these regulations. Added to the expressions of opposition related to absence of need and impact on Dam Pond and the causeway, these concerns make your decision, as I said in my Suffolk Times letter, a no-brainer. There are communities that need and want improved access to water. Say no to the SCWA so that they can take their stimulus money to these communities. John G. Stewart Nancy P. Stewart 6611 Ridge Rock Lane Knoxville, TN 37909 595 Navy Street Orient, NY 11957 865-584-3834 8/4/2010 SCWA says they will take a permit from you as a sign of popular support in the communi... Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Venetia Hands[venetia@handsconsulting.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:57 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: jon.schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; mart@marcalessi.com; ed@edromaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreviewcom.mac.com; info@orientwater.info Subject: SCWA says they will take a permit from you as a sign of popular support in the community!!! Chairman James Gaughran himself said to me personally, that if you grant SCWA the permit application before you, they will take this as a sign of public support. This despite the fact that you very clearly said you would rule on narrow, technical grounds -- - and that your hearing was not about the pipeline and whether we want it or not. You have received many letters from Orient residents in the past 2 weeks. We do not want it - overwhelmingly. Do not allow SCWA to hide behind you; they will. The Town Board received many letters from Orient residents in April when they were considering the water map amendment. We were already clear that we do not want this and there are more of us now. The Town Board rejected the water map amendment because of this lack of support, correctly so. SCWA must obtain ALL NECESSARY permits and permissions before they bring in their pipeline. This includes obtaining an amendment to the Southold Town Water Map. And that, in turn, has always included a full SEQRA review. SCWA not only has not presented evidence of these to you. You know full well that the town map extension law was rejected, unanimously. You must follow the lead of the Town Board. Finally, in their original application, SCWA stated that there was no public opposition to their project. There wasn't when they filed it. As we all know, the opposition now is overwhelming. To grant this permit application would be unconscionable. You and we would have to live with the terrible consequences for years to come. The worst would be left for the children of Southold. Possibly your children. Venetia Hands venetin ILauds �-' � ��� ��� �..1. P.O.Box 398.Orient,NY 11957 --- -_-_- 9 1 7-363-47j7 c- 8/4/2010 Standish Lauren From: Russell, Scott Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 8:35 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: FW: SCWA's application --Original Message----- From: gerrimcnamara@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto:gerrimcnamara@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:46 PM To: Russell, Scott Subject: Fw: SCWA's application Dear Scott, Please see an email that I sent to the Trustees. Unfortunately, I misspelled your name - sorry. Gerri McNamara Sent from my Verizon wireless B1ackBerry -----original Message----- From: gerrimcnamara@vzw.blackberry.net Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:38:36 To: <Lauren.standish@town.southold.ny.us> Reply-To: gerrimcnamara@vzw.blackberry.net CC: <scott.russel@town.southold.ny.us> Subject: SCWA's application Dear Ms. Standish, I live in orient and want you to know that I oppose SCWA's application for a permit to run a pipeline from East Marion through the wetlands to Brown Hills. Gerri McNamara Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry i 1 Aug 04 10 01:03p p.1 pn- 4 D GETERS R. K,*B"KmTHAM, JR. PETERS hTECK,.HAl0*8 ORIENT, Nmw YoRR 11957 Southhold Town Board of Trustees AFAR 7!lasTt�s A� DO M67 AA4*w So WA To cows': 1 NTe OR IEN216 n 1 f #lp IS js ai LTi THsy lot" COME w TjysMr #s ?ee MItCON FAPJV ZAAW TkAT 16 'rNltvwTArJv&A * mar s oy ,pro 're S C&04* k MAY Tme gsaNT mssT -rowm RTT�tMsy s Apptwit To SF REApy F•je laoe wT A f16NT p4sAss A►ot/fOR&WIn►C yos.* pwpp ►swum v' j! SCWA r'• D�! kNnt�! DAM f'o�ts C1tKI�t. We. D,Wj'' Nts r Moll' DJWA#pA#&AW W &Rj MT. WE 'TR tlt sT yo fc. vFx,y Page 1 of 4 Standish, Lauren From: Ginnie Goddard [gingod1@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:50 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Orient Water �n Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills, as it fails to fulfill many criteria: SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands. The question is not: Will there be a hurricane? But: when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. 8/4/2010 Page 2 of 4 C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95% of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents --to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point, throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50 — 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits. That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. 8/4/2010 Page 3 of 4 Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations,hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a "80% majority" are disingenuous at best. 8/4/2010 Page 4 of 4 D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Ginnie Goddard, 700 King St Orient 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Doug Constant[dconstant@optonline.netj Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:06 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: SCWA pipeline Dear Lauren, Ordinarily I am not a letter writer. I have attended a number of meetings regarding the proposed plan to run a pipeline to carry water from Dam Pond bridge along the road and then dig a trench past the wetlands and thence along the Main Road out to Browns Hills Road. Our Trustees have heard a few pros and a lot of cons regarding this project. I think the project is a silly way to spend Federal dollars and it won't put any Southolders to work. That, I beleive, was the point of the"stimulus" program. Digging in the wetlands is a bit dicey-the BP engineers thought the oil well was safe too. Since the Trustees have the responsibility to protect our environment and marine resources why would they consider this project as viable when the benefits fall to so few and a mistake whether man-made or caused by a natural disaster has the potential to harm our marine resources. Fresh water in Tuthill's Creek would wipe out the Oysterponds Oyster Company for instance. Let the SCWA help folks that want their help. Clearly most of us don't! Thanks, Douglas Constant 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: getscots@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:35 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; tkelly@timesreview.com; Russell, Scott Subject: [NEWSENDER] - SCWA application - Message is from an unknown sender Dear Ms. Standish -- Thank you for delivering the following message to our Trustees in advance of their meeting tomorrow. Dear Gentlemen and Trustees: I write to request that you reject the application before you for a wetlands permit for the Suffolk County Water Authority's transmission line from East Marion to Browns Hills. As I am sure you have heard from my neighbors and other concerned parties, the application fails to satisfy several criteria basic to the review process. It also fails to address concerns about the pipeline project's environmental impact both at and around Dam Pond but also to our entire precious aquifer. I urge you to continue your careful study of SCWA's scheme, tactics and transparency -- yes, they have a duty to be transparent in their service of the public good -- as you also consider their incomplete application, ,the overwhelming wishes of my community, proceedings at the Town Board level and the un-wished-for, unpleasant and irrevocably harmful consequences posed by the pipeline at this time. Sincerely - Scott Stein Orient, NY 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 2 Standish, Lauren From: Kathleen Kmet Becker[kkbkmet@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:22 PM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com; news@orientwater.info Subject: SCWA permit request Dear Lauren, Please forward my letter to the trustees listed below. Thank you. Kathleen Becker -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ To: Southold Town Trustees Jill Doherty, President James King, Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. John Bredemeyer Dear Trustees: I have been a property in Orient since 1993 and a full time resident and registered voter since since 2005. SCWA's campaign to bring a pipeline to Browns' Hill is of great concern to me. The more I have followed this issue, and the more I have learned, the more strongly I feel, as do the majority of my neighbors that there is no water crisis in Orient. SO WHAT IS THE REAL REASON THAT SCWA WANTS TO BRING A PIPELINE INTO ORIENT?? SCWA's premise that they are only going to bring water to the 24 or so homes on Browns' Hill (most not full- time residents). This seems a dire misuse of stimulus monies, especially as there are other areas in Suffolk County who had repeatedly asked SCWA for help. I and others feel that SCWA 's intent is ultimately to take water west to those areas that are more compromised than Orent. Their management has been very clear that profit is a major motivation in coming to Orient. I believe they have not been forthright about what their real agenda is to anyone who has questioned their motives including our Town Board and Trustees. Please do not approve the wetlands permit application filed with Southold Town by SWCA, or postpone consideration until such time all of the property owners of Orient have been surveyed (SCWA agreed to do so and has not) as to their wishes regarding "public"water" and a comprehensive plan for Southold is complete. As a purported "public benefit" entity, they need to listen to work with the public. We need a long term plan, we need to address storm water run-off, preserving our aquifer and educating citizens on how they can become stewards of the environment and the precious resources we have. Thank you. Respectfully, Kathleen Becker 8/4/2010 Page 2 of 2 Kathleen kmet Becker PO Box 151 - Orient, NY 11957-0151 Ph: 631.323.1326 Cell: 917.743.7176 SKYPE: kmetkid 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 3 Standish, Lauren From: Jocelyn Ozolins Dozl@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 7:44 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Proposed Pipeline Dear Trustees: I believe it is your civic and legal duty to reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line From East Marion to Browns Hills,as it fails to fulfill many criteria: - SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage.The wall has been breached.The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway—under and through wetlands.The question is not:Will there be a hurricane?But:when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think:fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond,the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries,etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a"bubble"of fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside(filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table,and accelerates salt water intrusion(since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95%of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents—to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. 1. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. 8/4/2010 Page 2 of 3 As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal,and the Trustees should not be a party to it.The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project:to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline.This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point,throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50—100 year consequences of this will,without a doubt,trigger more development in Orient—at denser levels than current zoning permits.That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage,as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there.There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient,and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously.Why the Trustees are even considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no,despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers,and fishermen.This is disingenuous at best. C.THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills(the people to be served)are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+households have already signed a petition that says"Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a"80% majority"are disingenuous at best. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL(CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials(of both parties)at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of 8/4/2010 Page 3 of 3 the project,the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent,transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. Thank you. Jocelyn Ozolins August 4, 2010 8/4/2010 Page 1 of 4 Standish, Lauren r From: deborah dumont[deborandumont@mac.coml Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 8:36 AM To: Standish, Lauren; ion.Schneider@mail.house.gov; lavalle@senate.state.ny.us; Marc@marcalessi.com; Ed@EdRomaine.com; Russell, Scott; tkelly@timesreview.com; --.� info@orientwater.info Subject: ORIENT WATER Dear Trustees; `J,O '� I do not want the water main from East Marion to Browns Hills, or for that matter,ta,any,WtW i� Orient. It is your responsibility to listen to your constituents; the SCWA are not metrib�r� community. Moreover, it is your legal and civic duty to reject the application. SECTION 275.12 THE TRUSTEES MAY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO PERFORM OPERATIONS APPLIED FOR ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OPERATIONS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY: A. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE WETLANDS OF THE TOWN. B. ADVERSELY AFFECT FISH, SHELLFISH OR OTHER BENEFICIAL MARINE ORGANISMS, AQUATIC WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION OR THE NATURAL HABITAT THEREOF. The Causeway from the bridge at Dam Pond into Orient is already highly susceptible to flood and storm-tide damage. The wall has been breached. The Army Corps of Engineers is trying to fix it. Serious engineering studies need to be conducted to see what pressure the pipeline will be under as it crosses the causeway —under and through wetlands. The question is not: Will there be a hurricane? But: when will there be a hurricane? The risks of a break in the water main need to be assessed more thoroughly because the damage one would cause would be enormous. Even without storms, SCWA deals with 200+ frozen and broken pipes in their system every winter. Think: fresh water from the pipe pouring into Dam Pond, the bird conservation area, out into Orient Harbor and the fishing, scallop and oyster nurseries, etc. could be devastating. C. CAUSE SALT WATER INTRUSION INTO THE FRESH WATER RESOURCES OF THE TOWN. E. INCREASE THE DANGER OF FLOOD AND STORM-TIDE DAMAGE. The Orient aquifer is a distinct and irreplaceable aquifer, a "bubble" of 8/6/2010 Page 2 of 4 fresh water surround by salt water held in a very fragile balance. Piping in additional fresh water from the outside (filled with chemicals like chlorine) upsets this balance, raises the water table, and accelerates salt water intrusion (since salt water is heavier than fresh) putting the fresh water wells of the 90 to 95% of Orient residents not hooked up to the pipeline at risk. It's an irreversible vicious cycle that threatens the aquifer, and the free clean water supplies of Orient residents -- to the benefit of SCWA and their monopoly ability to charge increasing numbers for water. Think: anyone who has suffered the floods in the Village, our farms or Narrow River Road after a rainstorm understands how crucial it is to protect the water table. I. OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN. J. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT AREAS SCWA builds pipelines to last 100 years. I ask the Trustees to think about the consequences of this pipeline over that time period. As you know, SCWA's partial declaration of their full intent, "segmentation", is illegal, and the Trustees should not be a party to it. The pipeline to Browns Hills is just one segment of a much larger intended project: to bring public water to all of Orient, and possibly to pump water out of Orient through the pipeline. This means there will be more digging and installing all the way to Orient Point, throughout the Village, in existing sub-divisions, ultimately down Narrow River Road. The 50 — 100 year consequences of this will, without a doubt, trigger more development in Orient— at denser levels than current zoning permits. That in turn leads to more pollution and sewage, as housing and development are by far the biggest contributor's to poor water quality in areas like ours. Anyone who doubts this and thinks current zoning is sufficient or defensible has not looked at what is happening on the South Fork as public water gains a hold there. There is not a single instance of public water intrusion we can find in Suffolk County that has not led directly to development. Outside developers are already holding large tracts of land in Orient, and at least one is already on the record supporting public water in order to get in. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCWA IS USING IN ITS APPLICATION: A. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN IN THE FORM OF THE WATER SUPPLY MAP AMENDMENT. The Southold Town Board rejected this unanimously. Why the Trustees are even 8/6/2010 Page 3 of 4 considering this application given they are part of Southold Town is a big question. B. PART 2, Q 20, IS THERE LIKELY TO BE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY RELATED TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? SCWA states no, despite the strong and very public opposition from both of the North Fork's leading environmental organizations, hundreds of citizens, as well as leading farmers, and fishermen. This is disingenuous at best. C. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DEMAND FOR THIS WATER SUPPLY IN ORIENT. All 24 households in Brown's Hills (the people to be served) are adamantly opposed to the pipeline. Along the pipeline route, only 17 of 137 household surveyed by SCWA want the pipeline at this time. More broadly, close to 300 Orient residents out of 700+ households have already signed a petition that says "Not at this time" Claims made by SCWA counsel to the Southold Town Board that they have a "80% majority" are disingenuous at best. D. THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM E. NOR DOES IT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC) OTHER COMMENTS Beyond the illegal segmentation scheme, and negotiation tactics in bad faith, SCWA has apparently made statements to elected officials (of both parties) at the Federal, State and County and Town level that have apparently led to significant, erroneous understandings about the scope of the project, the nature and urgency of the water quality and health justification for the parties actually being served, and many other matters, at almost every turn. We request that the Trustees consider carefully the intent, transparency, completeness and veracity of written and verbal communications with SCWA, as you uphold your duty to protect our wetlands and our fragile water supply, as well as our hard-earned tax dollars and our faith in a transparent political process. 8/6/2010 Page 4 of 4 Sincerely, Deborah Dumont deborah dumont, orient resident since 1968. deborandumontna mac.com 212 213 2525 cell 631 323 2416 land line read my new blog at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deborah-dumont,/ 8/6/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Melamud, Susan M. [SMelamud@hazenandsawyer.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 1:49 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER] - Public Water and Wetlands Permit-Message is from an unknown sender Importance: High Attachments: Letter to Suffolk Times2.doc; Letter to Scott Russell.doc Dear Ms. Standish: I understand that the Board of Trustees is planning to vote on issuing a wetlands permit to the Suffolk County Water Authority for installation of a water main between East Marion and Orient. As a resident of East Marion (18603 Main Road) who has a private well as our source of water supply and is also a board-certified water treatment professional, I am writing to provide some important information concerning this issue. Attached is a copy of a letter I wrote to the Southold Town Board, along with another I wrote to the Suffolk Times, but which was never published. As I have stated at one of the public meetings that the Town Board held, I am in favor of the public water main, for the many reasons cited in the two attached letters. I would like to point out that much "misinformation" has been disseminated to the Town Board and most likely, to the Trustees, as well. Fallacious claims about poorer water quality, health effects of chlorine disinfectant in public water, and the virtues of in-home treatment systems have been discussed by project opponents. On the other hand, the very detrimental effects that the discharge of concentrated backwash wastewater from home treatment systems into the home septic system have been largely ignored. Our fragile and shallow sole source aquifer is slowly being contaminated by these discharges which re-introduce the same pollutants that the home treatment systems removed. The important improvements to health and safety that public water will provide are also not being touted — greatly enhanced fire-fighting capability, and reliable, year-round regulatory-compliant water that meets all Safe Drinking Water standards. I am hoping that the Trustees will read the attached material so that they can be better informed in determining their vote on the wetlands permit requested by SCWA. I believe that the construction methods being proposed by SCWA will avoid any significant adverse impacts on the wetlands being traversed. Please distribute this email to them. I thank you and the Trustees for your consideration of the attached material. I would welcome any questions that the Trustees may have, and can be reached at the above email address. Best regards, - - Susan amud, PE ,DPlomate American Academy of Environmental Engineers ] �� n � 1 _ II I 8/10/2010 The Case for Public Water—Unmasking the Myths I am a Professional Engineer, Planner, and environmental consultant specializing in water treatment, but I'm writing as a concerned 10-year resident of East Marion, in favor of the proposed public water main that the Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA)has offered to construct between East Marion and Orient Point. I recognize that I may be in the minority on this heated and much-debated issue, but I'd like the opportunity to set the record straight concerning the advantages of public water, and dispel a few statements of mis-information that have been disseminated over the past couple of weeks, both at public hearings and in letters to the editor of your newspaper. I'm hoping that you will print this letter so that the public can be better informed. Myth # 1: Public water quality is poorer than that produced by in-home reverse osmosis and other treatment units. Public water is not necessarily poorer in quality,but it is different. While Reverse Osmosis systems produce excellent water quality, they remove minerals and other constituents that have positive effects on both health and taste. Many bottled water companies that use RO often add minerals back into the treated water so that the water has an appealing taste. Any water provided by SCWA will be treated to the highest standards regulated by New York State. SCWA has to perform rigorous sample analysis and testing to comply with these regulations, and the analyses are performed by a state-licensed laboratory. Myth #2: Chlorine added to public water can be carcinogenic. This is completely untrue. Chlorine disinfection of water has proven to be one of the most important boons to mankind with respect to public health, essentially eliminating the scourges that cholera, typhoid, and other epidemics inflicted on people throughout the world for thousands of years. The addition of chlorine to disinfect drinking water results in the inactivation of 99.99% of all viruses, as well as a host of other pathogens. There is one downside to chlorine disinfection, however...free chlorine in the water can combine with organics and form disinfection by-products (DBPs), some of which (trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids)have been proven carcinogenic when ingested in large concentrations and volumes over a typical human lifespan. The good news is that groundwater (which constitutes almost all of SCWA's water supply), in general, has extremely low concentrations of organics, resulting in negligible DBP formation and essentially zero cancer risk. Myth #3: The drinking water quality problem in our area can be solved by having in-home carbon, reverse osmosis, and/or ion exchange systems in each home. Certainly, these systems, alone or in combination (depending on the specific water quality problem), will produce good quality water. However, each system produces a"reject stream" resulting from backwashing the media. The reject streams have high concentrations of contaminants—the very contaminants that were removed by the treatment systems—and these concentrated streams are typically discharged to the household septic systems, where they leach into the soil. In this manner, the contaminants contained in the reject streams ultimately travel back into our precious aquifer. In other words, we are slowly but surely poisoning our drinking water by reintroducing the very contaminants we had hoped to remove, and doing so in a more concentrated manner that continually worsens the drinking water quality! Myth # 4: Public water is an unnecessary evil that will cause overdevelopment of our rural communities,further taxing our infrastructure. Such is not the case....construction of a new water main does not constitute an automatic "green light' for development. Strict State and County laws governing septic system placement and setbacks preclude wholesale development even in areas where public water is available. Our Town codes and Planning/Zoning Boards are well-equipped to protect our communities from the threat of rampant development. The Town Council can ensure that the only parties to connect to the new main are existing homes with groundwater supplies, as well as any individual residences that may be constructed on currently undeveloped, single-home properties. Strict adherence to and enforcement of ordinance setback and density requirements will ensure that any new development is in harmony with our rural serenity, while residents can enjoy the healthful benefits of public water. Summing it Up...A Boon and Benefit In short, public water offers tremendous benefits. In addition to protecting our health and vulnerability to contaminants in the aquifer, it greatly enhances fire protection and safety, and, unlike private wells, is available during power outages, enabling us to flush toilets, take showers, and prepare food. Having public water thus makes us safer, healthier, and improves our property values. Many homes like ours, situated along Main Road east of the existing pipeline, would welcome the great advantages that a public drinking water supply offers. Sincerely, Susan M. Melamud, P.E., Professional Planner, and Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers Susan and Ron Melamud 66 Constitution Way Jersey City, NJ 07305 (201) 985-3870 December 1,2009 Mr. Scott Russell, Supervisor Town of Southold Town Hall- 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Dear Supervisor Russell: I am a Professional Engineer, Professional Planner, and environmental consultant specializing in water treatment, but I'm writing to you as a concerned resident of East Marion, strongly in favor of the proposed public water main that the Suffolk County Water Authority has offered to construct along Route 25,between East Marion and Orient Point. As the easternmost Soundfront property in East Marion(18603 Main Road),we reside east of the current termination of the existing water main in Route 25, and rely on a shallow(20-foot deep) well for our home's drinking water supply. Being so shallow(as needed to tap the underlying aquifer), our well is highly vulnerable to contamination from surface sources, as well as saltwater intrusion. Indeed, the water from our well, which we test regularly at great expense, has a high chloride content (indicating saltwater influence), as well as high iron concentration, well in excess of public drinking water standards. The water also has a low pH, making it"aggressive" and subjecting our plumbing system to corrosion. Living in close proximity to several farms, we also test for pesticides and herbicides, and while these levels are currently below regulatory requirements for public water, we are concerned about increasing concentrations of these toxic and carcinogenic compounds over time. We have had to install an ion exchange system to remove both calcium hardness and iron from our well water. While this system works well, it requires regular maintenance—replenishing the salt supply, backwashing, and ultimately replacing the resin when spent. Failure to do so in a timely manner could result in widespread clogging of our home's entire plumbing system with oxidized iron particles, requiring extensive replacement of piping and plumbing fixtures. We have experienced such failures while we were away from the home, despite our best efforts to be diligent in the maintenance and upkeep of the ion exchange system. We also experienced a freeze-up during a severe winter that, among other damages, resulted in our having to replace the entire ion exchange system, located under our home in an unheated space. There is no other place to locate this bulky system inside our modest-sized home. Besides these nuisances and costly inconveniences,health effects are by far our greatest concern with respect to remaining on our groundwater supply. It costs close to $1,000 each time that we test our Supervisor Scott Russell December 1,2009 Page 2 well for the various contaminants of concern, and even doing this twice a year does not ensure that we will detect a significant change in water quality soon enough to prevent adverse impacts on our health. Rising levels of contaminants threaten our ability to ensure the continued safety of our private well supply. We would greatly benefit from being able to access the public water supplied by SCWA, which we are confident meets all regulatory standards, and is considerably more safe and reliable than our shallow well. The homes in the Browns Hill development,which suffered severe well contamination and have received in-home treatment systems from SCWA, would also greatly benefit from public water, as would the environment—our vital resource. The in-home treatment systems provided by SCWA require diligent and costly maintenance, and they produce a concentrated wastewater from their backwash operation, which must be disposed of outside the home. While I am not aware of the specific details for Browns Hill, I know that, without a sewer system, such wastewater is typically discharged to the ground through a drywell, where,over time, it leaches into the aquifer. These wastewater discharges thus create a vicious cycle that actually propagates groundwater contamination—the very situation that the in-home treatment systems were installed to remedy! We ask that the Town of Southold reconsider its position and approve SC WA's proposed water main project. Many other homes like ours, situated along Main Road east of the existing pipeline, would welcome the great advantages that a public drinking water supply offers. While I completely understand the Town's concern with respect to protecting our beautiful rural setting from overdevelopment, I would argue that the Town ordinances and Planning and Zoning Boards, along with the Trustees,protect us well from this threat. Construction of a new water main does not, by itself, constitute an automatic "green light" for development. With our Board members at the helm and in control,the Town can ensure that the only parties to connect to the new main are existing homes with groundwater supplies, as well as any individual residences that are constructed on currently undeveloped, single-home properties. Strict adherence to and enforcement of our ordinance setback and density requirements will continue to ensure that new development is in harmony with our rural serenity,while current residents can enjoy the healthful benefits of public water. On behalf of other East Marion,Orient, and Orient Point residents in our situation, my family and I implore you and the Town Council to reconsider approval of the proposed SCWA water main. Without such approval, we will be denied the access to public water that we greatly need. Thank you for your efforts on our behalf. Sincerely, Susan M. Melamud, P.E., P.P. Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Orientexpress4l4@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 2:22 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Fwd: water, water, everywhere, and not a drop to drink From: Orientexpress4l4@aol.com To: tkelly@timesreview.com Sent: 8/10/2010 12:42:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: water, water, everywhere, and not a drop to drink It is an outrage that one elected official ( Scott Russell ) Southold Town Supervisor,would try to use his position of influence to coerce other elected officials that sit on the Board of Trustees by telling them to "just say no" to approving the water main issue in Orient. Mr Russell has been more of a hindrance then a help in trying to resolve the issue of contaminated wells that exist in most of Orient. He fails to recognize that this is not just a Browns Hills issue. He fails to recognize that the Oysterponds elementary school spends$ 5000 per year to test their wells. He fails to recognize that with public water the school would be able to install a fire preventive sprinkler system that would greatly reduce their insurance rates.He fails to recognize that a sprinkler system would not only provide added protection for the children and staff, but for the building itself. If I had such a system in my home, I could save ten to twenty percent on my home owners insurance rate.The Suffolk County Health Department has warned many of us not to drink the water if you are pregnant,. receiving chemo therapy, people on dialysis, a compromised immune system, or if you are a small child. What is it that Supervisor Russell Does not understand that by having fire hydrants we would all have better protection ?What part of the words" CONTAMINATED WELLS"does Supervisor Russell not understand ?We need a Town Board that is concerned about the health and protection of our community, not one that panders for votes and denies the home owners with contaminated wells the clean water they are entitled to. William Gibbons 631-323-0105 {I � J I f f.`j 'j 8/10/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: DWhitsit@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:15 PM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: Please give to Trustees. Dear Trustees: I wish to add my name to those full time residents of orient who oppose receiving public water. The Orient aquifer is a unique aquifer, requiring tender care and responsible stewardship for its preservation. The dangers of allowing public water access to Orient are multiple and dangerous. I ask that you do not permit the application currently before you to allow the respective authority to proceed. Thank you. Diana Whitsit 36505 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 8/17/2010 Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Peter Treiber[pstreiber@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 11:06 AM To: Standish, Lauren Subject: [NEWSENDER]-Orient Water-Message is from an unknown sender Lauren, Please forward this email to the Town Trustees at Southold Town Hall on my behalf. As residents of Orient, we are dismayed that SCWA is moving forward with the digging of the water main even though the residents are strongly opposed to it! We sincerely hope that you will change your mind. Peter S. & Irene M. Treiber 310 Oyster Ponds Lane Orient, NY 11957 , I 8/17/2010 Page 1 of 2 e Standish, Lauren From: Schneider, Jon [Jon.Schneider@mail.house.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 10:38 AM To: Standish, Lauren Cc: Russell, Scott Subject: Orient Ms. Standish, Congressman Bishop would like to share the following letter with President Doherty and the Board of Town Trustees. Thank you. Jon Schneider Deputy Chief of Staff/District Director Office of Congressman Tim Bishop (NY-01) (631)696-6500 www.house gov/limbishop Sign upfor Congressman Bishop's e-newslene_r_ p- August 17, 2010 President Jill Doherty and Southold Town Trustees Town Hall Annex Building PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear President Doherty and Trustees, I am writing to urge you reject the Suffolk County Water Authority's (SCWA) application for a wetlands permit for a transmission line from East Marion to Browns Hills. I do not have a formal role in either the decision of the New York State Department of Health and New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation to initially fund this application, nor do I have a role in the permit application before you. Because this project is funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, I have been involved in making sure the community is heard on this project. I believe it is vital that when a project goes forward in a community,that it has the support of those who will be most affected. It is clear to me from conversations I have had with people from the area, as well as correspondence I received that the overwhelming majority of Orient residents oppose this project. Furthermore, based on my conversations with the leadership of the SCWA, I have been assured that the project will not go forward if this permit is denied for any reason by the Trustees. SCWA has clearly indicated both to me personally and in public that it will not challenge a denial by the Trustees. 8/17/2010 Page 2 of 2 With the assumption that the Trustees would oppose this permit, I have worked closely with Supervisor Russell, local residents and the SCWA to remove the Water Authority from Browns Hills. However, these efforts are at a standstill until such time as the pipeline is totally off the table. Therefore, I strongly encourage you not to view this application with a narrow lens but to consider the scope of the entire project and the opportunity you have to respond to a clearly expressed position of the citizens you serve. Thank you for your consideration. If my office can be of any assistance to you, please do not hesitate to ask. Sincerely, Tim Bishop Member of Congress 8/17/2010 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH OLD PLANS FOR THE EXTENSION OF Boardhhold ofTrustees WATER MAIN ON MAIN ROAD CNYS ROUTE 25) EAST MARION / ORIENT, NEW YORK DRAWING INDEX JUNE 17, 2009 wFE'f Nn SIFET TfRE D-1 DETAIL SHEET ( WATER MAN NSTALLATION DETAILS ) TS-1 TIRE SHEET P-2 DETAIL (TREE LEGEND) 0-1 GENERAL M070 SHDETAILSHEET( WATER MAN NSTALLA110N DETAILS ) Nt K-2 GENERAL NOTES SHEET D-3 DETAIL SHEET( WATER MAN INSTALLATION & HYDRANT DETAILS ) o-1 CONSTRUCTION PUN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA 0+00 TO 6+00) D-4 DETAIL SHEET( WATER MAN INSTALLATION a SERVICE DETAIL ) o-2 CONSTRUCTION PUN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 0+00 TO 12+00) D-6 DETAL SHEET( EROSION CONTROL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION OF WATER MAIN) C-3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA 12+00 TO 16+00) D-6 DETAIL SHEET( RESTORATION INSTALLATION DETAILS ) o-4 CONSTRUCTION PLAN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 16+00 TO 26+00) D-7 DETAIL SHEET( RMM71ON : ROAD MARIONO INSTALLATION DETAILS ) J_ Cr6 CONSTRUCTION PAN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 28+00 ro 33+00) D-6 LINEAR MEASURES 1V C-6 CGW MC ION PUN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 33+00 ro 40+00) o-9 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PR07WRC 1 #1n , C-7 CONSTRUCTION PLAN (MAN PWALLATaN FROM STA 40+00 TO 46+00 J C-B CONSTRUCTION KAN ((wuAN�N INSTALLATION FROM STA. 46+00 70 66+00) D-11 OONSTICIION ENTRANCES PROTECTION R J�9 Y i f o-9 CONSTRUCTION PLAN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA 66+00 ro Qz+Oo� o-12 SEONwr TRAPS y� o-fo caraTaLlcT1ON PLAN (MAN NSTALLATION FROM STA. 62+00 ro 66+00) sad D-13 PAVEMENT MAR10q DETAILS C-11 CONSTRUCTION PLAN (YAN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 75+00 ro 76+00) D-14 SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAILS ✓ �C-13 CONSTRUCTION PLAN p1AN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 76+00 O 61+00) +�' 0-13 CONSTRUCTION RAN (MAN NSULLAIION FROM STA N+00 ro 67+00) D-16 SIDEWALLC CURB RAID DETAILS o-14 CONSTRUCTION PLAN ((MYAANN OWALLA71ON FROM STA 67+00 ro 93+00) 0-16 SIDEWALKCURSRAW DETAILS C-15 CONSTRUCTION PAN (YAN INSTALLATION FROM STA 23+00 TO 9"00) D-17 SDEWAIX CUR® RAMP DETALS 0-16 oONslRucnOlN PLAN c ^ - r.DEAN Nsruu7aN FROM STA 99+0o ro 1aa+Oo) D-19 coNaETE OHLe. Cue • 9MT1vi AND HOT Mot ASPHALT Cue y C-17 CONSTRUCTION PLAIN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 106+00 ro 111+Oo) o-19 D OMY �T� / o-f6 oarsTnucnON Puw (QYIAALN! DWALLA71M man STA 111+00 IT m+0o D DIcAVATION AID EMBANKMENT DETAINS ;/�(rr/r�,,___-_ - r 0-19 CONSTRUCTION PAN (YAN INSTALLATION FROM STA 117+00 TO 123+00) o-22 E)WAEXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENTEMBANIN DETAILS �J � t/J/r C-2D CMMWC110H PAN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 123+00 To 129+00 D-23 PR-1 CALCIUM AND CHLORIDE ACCELERATED NOTES , it , 1/ (MAN > CON ETE PA CFI RE AICDET AILED CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAILS 0-2t COtI31Ri1C710N PLAN NAN INSTALLATION FROM STA 12Y+00 ro 136+00) D-24 CONCRETE PAVEIIFNT REPAIR DETAILS ---�f aai£mT a22 CO11S1lpICliON PLAN Q�IIAANN NSGLLAIION FROM STA 136+00 ro 144Oo+F0o0o)) D-25 20 CONCRETE PAMEMIDIT REPAIR DETAILS C-23 CONSTRUCTION PLAN (MAN NSTALLAIIdI FROM STA 140+00 ro /46+00) 0-26 CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAILS C-24 CONSTRUCTION PLAN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA 145+00 TO160+00) T-1 TREE LEGEND cae�. %i eA OR C-25 COIISIRUCTON PLAN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA. 150+00 TO 166+00) MPT-1 MAINTENANCE AID PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC PLAN t DETAL , i WORK C-20 CONSTRUCTION PAN (MAN INSTALLATION FROM STA 166+Oo To 16o+oo) MPT-2 OPERATNN INVOLVING SIDEWALK CLOSURE W/PEDESTRIAN DETOUR OF ROADWAY Cr27 CONSTRUCTION PLAN 0" INSTALLATION FROM STA. 160+00 TO 165+00) 1PT-3 SHORT-OURATOI STATIONARY TRAFFIC PLAT ! DETAILS o-26 cOlrslaucnarN PAN (MAN NsrAUATaN FROM STA 166+00 ro 172400) - C-29 DIRECTIONAL DULL PROFILE MP P T-4 SHORT-TERM STATIONARY TRAFFIC AN • DETAILS MPT-6 SNORE-TEAM STATIONARY iRAFFIf. PLAN ! DETAILS -�- LOCATION MAP SCALE HIS. S uffolk Coun ty Wa ter A u th on ty REVISED 02-10-2010 REVISED 01-25-2010 Oakdale, Sunrise Highway REVISED 11-16-2009 SHEET TS-1 Oakdale, NY 11769 REVISED 9-3-2009 1 OF 64 (631) 563 0386 NOTE COORO/NATE VSIEIO MY. STAIE PLANE FEET, Lt. ZONE 3104E DATUM NAD.1927 GENERAL NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE D.O.T. j ENGINEER. OF ALL RESTORATION OF STATE ROW SHALL BE TO 13. REPAIR ALL DISTURBED PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS PER THE N.Y.S. 21. IN ADDITION TO THE DEVICES SHOWN IN THE MAINTENANCE AND STATE SPECIFICATIONS AND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE STATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR AS ORDERED BY THE PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC SCHEMES OF THE MUTCD AND THE ENGINEER. ENGINEER. PLANS, SHADOW VEHICLES AND MOBILE CONSTRUCTION ZONE 14. ANY EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK DISTURBED AS A RESULT OF IMPACT ATTENUATORS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE WORK IS 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED SCWA'S WORK SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED LOCATED IN A CLOSED SHOULDER OR TRAVEL LANE ADJACENT TO PLANS, NYS SPECIFICATIONS OR AS DIRECTED BY NYSDOT WITH 1-1/20 OF HOT MIX ASPHALT AND MAINTAINED UNTIL SUCH TRAFFIC AT ISOLATED OR FIXED LOCATIONS WITHIN THE WORK TIME AS PERMANENT RESTORATION OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK SHALL ZONE. THE SHADOW VEHICLE SHALL ONLY BE USED WHEN 3. MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC SHALL BE THE BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO NYSDOT WORKERS AND/OR EQUIPMENT ARE ACTUALLY OCCUPYING THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION SITE OF WORK. THE SHADOW VEHICLE SHALL BE POSITIONED TO WORK. OFTHE PROJECT. ALL NEW SIDEWALK SURFACES, TEMPORARY OR PROTECT THE WORKERS IN THE EVENT OF WORK ZONE INTRUSION. LOCATION, THE SCWA THIS 4. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK AT PERMANENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED TO ADA SHADOW VEHICLES MAY NOT BE REQUIRED WHEN THE WORK CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE THIS THAT A TONE OUT OF COMPLIANT STANDARDS. ALL NEW SIDEWALK SURFACES SHALL OPERATION TAKES PLACE OVER AN EXTENDED AREA SUCH AS FOR MEET EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN A FLUSH AND LEVEL PAVING, JOINT SEALING OR PAVEMENT REPAIR OPERATIONS ALL UNDERGROUND SIGNAL EQUIPMENT IS REQUIRED. SCWA's MANNER. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DETECTABLE WARNING (EXCEPT WHEN SUCH WORK TAKES PLACE WITHIN 360 M OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO CODE RULE 753 AND HAVE STRIPS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED. DETECTABLE WARNING BEGINNING OF A LANE CLOSURE) OR WHERE WORKERS AREI UNDERGROUND FACILITIES MARKED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. UNITS SHALL BE ADDED TO CURB RAMPS AT STREET PROTECTED BY THE USE OF CONCRETE BARRIER OR ON SIDE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ONE CALL CENTER FOR UTILITY INTERSECTIONS AND AT STOP— OR YIELD— CONTROLLED STREET LANE CLOSURES. MARK OUT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ENTRANCES TO COMMERCIAL OR PUBLIC FACILITIES WHERE THE 5. S.C.W.A. WILL COORDINATE WITH N.Y.S. D.O.T. ENGINEER PRIOR TO ENTRANCES FUNCTION LIKE PUBLIC STREETS. DETECTABLE 22. THE LOCATION OF SHADOW VEHICLES SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS COMMENCEMENT IN ORDER TO CONFIRM LOCATIONS OF ANY WARNIGS SHOULD NOT BE INSTALLED ON CURB RAMPS AT NOT FIXED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES POSITION THE RELATIVELY MINOR ENTRANCES SUCH AS RESIDENTIAL OR VEHICLE CLOSE ENOUGH TO WORKERS TO INSURE MAXIMUM PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, UTILITY COMMERCIAL DRIEWAYS, UNLESS THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY AN PROTECTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MOVE SHADOW VEHICLES POLES AND PEDESTRIAN POLE FOOTINGS AT SIGNALED INTERSECTIONS. OFFICIAL SIGNAL OR SIGN AS THE ACTUAL WORK LOCATION WITHIN THE WORK ZONE CHANGES. IN NO CASE SHALL THE SHADOW VEHICLES BE PARKED 15 WHEN THE CONTRACTOR IS WORKING WITHIN 4.5M OF A TRAVELED CLOSER THEN 80' FOR A STATIONARY OPERATION NOR CLOSER 6. THE SCWA CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL LANE,THE ENGINEER MAY REQUIRE THE ADJACENT TRAVEL LANE THEN 120' FOR A MOVING OPERATION, FROM THE BEGINNING OF REPLACE ALL SIGNAL INTERCONNECT CABLE, DETECTOR CABLE, TO BE CLOSED.CONDUIT, AND ALL UNDERGROUND ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT THE WORK AREA. MORE THEN ONE SHADOW VEHICLE SHALL BE USED IF WORKERS ARE WORKING AT WORK LOCATIONS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION 16. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL WORK ZONE SIGNS USED ON SUFFICIENTLY SEPARATED TO REQUIRE SEPARATE VEHICLES. MAIN ROAD (S.R. 25) SHALL BE THE LARGEST SIZED. SIZE 7. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A TRAFFIC AVAILABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MUTCD. RESPONSIVE MANNER AND ALL INTERCONNECT, WHERE EXISTING, 23. WHERE NECESSARY OR AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER THE SHALL BE MAINTAINED. THE SCWA CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY A 17 SCWA SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY 3" BASE OF BINDER AT ALL CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE FLAGGERS AT DRIVEWAYS TO NOT MA LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CHARGE OF PER CALENDAR DAY IF N.Y.S. D.O.T. ROAD INTERSECTIONS, CROSSING AND MAINTAIN SAME CONTROL TRAFFIC ENTERING THE TRAVEL WAY. ACTUATION AND COORDINATION IS NOT MAINTAINED. (IN A TRUE AND LEVEL MANNER) UNTIL SUCH TIME PERMANENT WORK IS PERFORMED BY S.C.W.A. RESTORATION CREWS do SHALL 8. SINGLE LANE CLOSURE PERMITTED E/B ON MAIN ROAD (S.R. 25) RESTORE ALL TOWN ROAD INTERSECTIONS AND CROSSINGS TO 24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE AN EXCAVATION PROTECTION FROM 9 am TO 3pm, AND W/B FROM 9 am TO 3 pm. NO LANE THEIR INDIVIDUAL TOWN REQUIREMENTS. SYSTEM WHEN NECESSARY. SHEETING, SHORING, A SHIELD SYSTEM, CLOSURES ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS NIGHT I.E. TRENCH BOX OR TRENCH SHIELD OR OTHER PRE—ENGINEERED TIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR 18. A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO THE PLANS R _ WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NYS DOT PERMIT ENGINEER. THE PROTECTIVE SYSTEM MAY B E USED TO PREVENT CAVE—INS. THE NEER. NIGHT TIME CONTRACTOR TO CLEAN DRAINA GE BASINS ALONG AND REQUIREMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT BE UTILIZED UNLESS ORDERED BY ANY PROTECTIVE SYSTEM SHALL BE AS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE NY 25 SITE FRONTAGE AT THE CONTAINED IN 29CFR1926. IT MAY BE LEFT IN PLACE ONLY WITH ENGINEER. THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ENGINEER. A SLOPING 9. ANY INTRUSIONS INTO MAIN ROAD (S.R. 25) COMPOSITE DRAINAGE BASINS FROM CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. (LAYBACK) OPT10N WILL BE UTILIZED. PAVEMENT AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NYS 19 RESIDENTS WILL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO WORKING EXCAVATING DOT REGION 10. PAST THEIR DRIVEWAYS. ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE 25' (VACANT SHALL P RE AND POST CUSTOMARY SHEETS 502-01 THROUGH 502-05 AS REQUIRED CONTRACTOR AT ALL TIMES BY ONLY OPENING OF THE APRON CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIO RAINAGE STRUCTURES. ANY AT A TIME DRAINAGE STRU ECEIVING CO DEBRIS SHALL 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP ROAD do SHOULDER AREA AT THE END BE C Y S.C.W.A. CONTRACTOR. OF EACH WORK DAY. 20. ARROW BOARDS USING LIGHT EMITTING DIODES (LEDs) AS THE 26. S.C.W.A. SHALL COORDINATE ITS WORK WITH NATIONAL GRID IN SOLE ILLUMINATING SOURCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED ON ORDER TO AVOID CONFLICTS AT OR NEAR STATION 54+00 DEPARTMENT PROJECTS UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 11. ANY SIGNS MISSING AS A RESULT OF S.C.W.A. CONSTRUCTION ARROW BOARDS SHALL DISPLAY A FLASHING ARROW FOR LANE 27. S.C.W.A. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BASINS PROJECT SHALL BE REPLACED AS PER N.Y.S. STANDARDS k CLOSURES. OTHER OPERATIONAL MODES SUCH AS SEQUENTIAL SPECIFICATIONS, NATIONAL MANUAL OF UNIFORM CONTROL DEVICES CHEVRONS, SEQUENTIAL ARROWS OR STEM ARROWS, ARE ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE NYS RTE 25 SITE AND N.Y.S. SUPPLEMENT OR ORDERED BY STATE ENGINEER (IF EXPLICITLY PROHIBITED FOR THESE APPLICATIONS, AND SHALL NOT FRONTAGE. DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION) BE USED ON DEPARTMENT PROJECTS.ARROW BOARDS SHALL NOT REVISED 02-10-2010 BE USED FOR LANE SHIFTS. A LANE SHIFT IS DEFINED AS A REVISED 01-25-2010 SHEET G-1 12. REPAIR EXISTING SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED LATERAL SHIFT IN THE TRAVEL PATH WITHOUT A REDUCTION IN REVISED 11-16-2009 2 ET 64 BY STATE ENGINEER. IF THE SHOULDER IS USED TO SUPPORT NUMBER OF LANES. REVISED 11-16- 0 TRAFFIC IT WILL BE RECONSTRUCTED AS ORDERED BY THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR NOTE COORDWE SYS U.' N.Y. STALE PLANE FEET, U. ZONE 310$ pOLAC NAD.1927 GENERAL NO TES � 28.) EXCAVATION WITHIN THE DRIP—LINE OF EXISTING TREES SHALL 35.) NYSDOT STD. SPECIFICATIONS — APPLICABLE SECTION TITLES 36.) PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION, THE REQUIRE THE USE OF METHODS TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE IMPACT TO CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TREES INCLUDING THE LIMBS AND THE ROOTS. TUNNELING Section 200 THE MILE MARKER WITH AN ENGLISH RULER NEXT TO UNDER OR AROUND ROOTS BY DRILLING, USING COMPRESSED AIR, Earthwork IT, SUCH THAT THE DIMENSIONS (IN INCHES) OF EACH AUGER BORING, PIPE JACKING, OR DIGGING BY HAND ARE Section 201 -Clearing and Grubbing SIDE OF THE MILE MARKER ARE SHOWN IN THE ACCEPTABLE METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR MAY PROPOSE Section 202-Removal of Structures and Obstructions PHOTOGRAPH. A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) PHOTOGRAPHS, ALTERNATE METHODS OF INSTALLING UTILITIES UNDER AN EXISTING Section 203 -Excavation and Embankment ONE FOR EACH SIDE OF THE MILE MARKER, SHALL BE ROOT SYSTEM WHEN WORK IS WITHIN THE DRIP—LINE OF TREES. Section204-ControlledLowStrengthMaterial(CLSM) TAKEN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN INSTALL MACHINE TRENCHING WITHIN THE DRIP—LINE SHALL ONLY BE FENCING OR OTHE R SUCH MEANS DEEMED ADEQUATE Section 205 Contaminated Soil Q E ALLOWED AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN CHARGE/REGIONAL TO PROTECT THE MILE MARKER FROM DAMAGE AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL ROOTS IN THE WALL OF THE TRENCH Section 206-Trench,Culvert and Structure Excavation DISTURBANCE DURING THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS, ADJACENT TO THE TREES SHALL BE HAND TRIMMED, MAKING Section 207-Geotextiles and Prefabricated Composite Drains for Structures AOBE/RLA. IF THE ENGINEER DETERMINES THE MILE CLEAR AND CLEAN CUTS THROUGH THE ROOTS. ALL DAMAGED, Section 208(Vacant) DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTORS MARKER HAS BEEN DAMA TORN, AND CUT ROOTS SHALL BE GIVEN A CLEAN CUT TO Section 209-Soil Erosion and Sediment Control OPERATIONS, IT SHALL A REPAIRED, BY A QUALIFIED REMOVE RAGGED EDGES, WHICH PROMOTE DECAY. CUT ROOTS Section 210-Removal and Disposal of Asbestos-Containing Material(Buildings,Bridges and MONUMENT AND STONE RESTORER, AS APPROVED BY WITH SHARP PRUNING INSTUMENTS; DO NOT BREAK OR CHOP. Highways) THE RLA, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE RLA, AT NO RIPPING OR TEARING OF TREE ROOTS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. EXPENSE TO THE STATE OF NEW YORK. 29 ) TRENCHING WITHIN THE DRIP LINE, INCLUDING ALL ANTICIPATED Section300 AREAS OF LAYBACK, SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM CLEARANCE Bases and Subbases BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF TREE TRUNK OR ROOT FLARE AT Section 301 (Vacant) GROUND LEVEL AND THE BEGINNING OF GROUND DISTURBANCE. Section 302-Bituminous Stabiliz ed Course i THE CLEARANCE BETWEEN TRUNK AND EDGE OF DISTURB ANCE E THREE SHALL BE E Section 303 -Optional Flexible Shoulder UAL TO Q TIMES THE DBH DIAMETER AT( BREAST HEIGHT OF THE TREE OR 24" WHICHEVER IS GREATER. Section 304-Subbase Course TREES WITH A 24" DBH OR GREATER SHALL MAINTAIN A DISTANCE Sections 305 and 306(Vacant) OF NO LESS THAN FIVE (5) FEET BETWEEN TRUNK AND EDGE OF Section 307-Hydrated Lime Stabilized Subgrade DISTURBANCE. A GREATER DISTANCE IS ENCOURAGED. Section 308- Soil Cement Course Sections 309 Thru 399(Vacant) 30.) TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHIN 24 HOURS. WHERE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH ADJACENT TO THE Section 400 TREES SHALL BE KEPT SHADED WITH FOUR LAYERS OF DAMPENED, a Asphalt MiMi UNTREATED BURLAP, WETTED AS FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY TO Section Hot ot01 -PlantProduction KEEP THE BURLAP MOIST. Section 402-Hot Mix Asphalt(HMA)Pavements 31.) TREES OR OTHER PLANT MATERIAL NOT DESIGNATED TO BE Section 403-Hot Mix Asphalt(HMA)Pavements for Municipalities REMOVED BUT THAT ARE DESTROYED OR IRREPARABLY DAMAGED Section 404(Vacant) BY CONTRACTOR OPERATIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE EIC/RLA, PavementSection 405-Cold Mix Bituminous (Open Graded SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED ( � ) L CED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN Section Vacant ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS. REPLACEMENTS ( ) Sections 408 and 409(Vacant) SHALL BE OF THE SAME SPECIES AND AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO Section 410-Bituminous Surface Treatment- SingleCourse THE SAME SIZE OF THE TREES TO BE REPLACED. Section 411 -Stabilized Gravel Surface Course 32.) S.C.W.A. HAS PERFORMED TEST HOLES UNDER ITS MAINTENANCE Sections 412 Thru 489(Vacant) PERMIT TO DETERMINE DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER. AT THIS TIME IT Section 490-Cold Milling APPEARS DEWATERING WILL NOT BE NECESSARY, BUT S.C.W.A. Sections491 Tbru499(Vacant) WILL BE PREPARED JUST IN CASE. 33.) ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MEETING OR EXCEEDING A 2: 1 SLOPE Section 600 SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT PRIOR Incidental Construction TO SEEDING. AOBE. Section601 (Vacant) Section 602 34.) NOTE THAT M.P.T. (LANE SHIFT) WILL BE MOVED FORWARD ON A Section 603-Culverts and Storm Drains DAILY BASIS. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE Section 604-Drainage Structures INSTALLING APPROXIMATE. 500' OF MAIN PER DAY. ALL Section 605- Underdrains DISTURBED ASPHALT WILL BE REPLACE WITH TEMPORARY Section 606-Guide Railing PAVEMENT DAILY. THE M.PT. WILL ADVANCE ON A DAILY BASIS Section 607-Fences WITH THE WORK. A LANE SHIFT INTO THE OPPOSITE SHOULDER AT Section 608-Sidewalks,Driveways and Bicycle Paths REVISED 02-10-2010 ANY SINGLE LOCATION WILL ONLY BE NEEDED FOR SHORT DURATIONS. REVISED 01 -25-2010 SHEET G-2 REVISED 11 -16-2009 3 OF 64 REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 EXI5TING 12"XG"TEE MU Concrete Sidewalk Curb Ramp Items: 1\ W/1-12' PLUG M/J item 608 01060009 concrete sidewalk curb ramps l�l W/1-6' PLUG M/J item 608.21 embedded detectable warning limits W/4-E/B3'T/R Concrete Sidewalk Restoration Items EXI5TING 12'X8'TEE 20302 unclassified excavation & disposal W/4-112' P UT WJ 608.0101 oncrete Sidewalk & Driveways \ Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration\ Items: \ 203,02 unclassified excavation & disp 4sal 304,10119917 6' subbase k11635 \ FX15TING HYDRA 22-T �� 402,198901 2' base course #795031-000 402.098101 1.5' top course asphalt H-V= 10 2'-G" \ 407.0101 tack coat T_� T_, V-M= I.-G. BURY= GO \ o p T-1 ID \ 1E 25 \ o N N (NYS R o o O0 n "'CONCRETE 51DEWALK - + o \ Ar T-1 CO Uri to -, \ T-, GRN`5 -, -, -, RpAp _ rn \ \\ T I Tit 3 4 5 \ Ro - - - ► — _ of = 2 ni El o El AIN c� 4 APRON 5TONC _ a (CWB-98-22 I-CRC) -0 O El - 12' VALVE d)BOX 01A4 \ \ Aspha(t\Shoulder Restoration Items: 490,10 milli 9 item \ ` \ alzBo 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 30410119917 6� subbase \ S EX15T. 37 OF 12'STEEL CA51NG 4\ 402.378901 5' ase course \ \A 37'OF8" D.LP. 402,198901 2.5' 'binder course 9� 402.098101 2' top ourse asphalt \ ` \ 407,0101 tack coat i LEGEND PROPOSED WATER MAIN IN5TALLATION CONCRETE SIDEWALK REVISED 01 -25-20I 0 1" = 40 GCB =CB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN REVISED I I - I G-2009 WATER VALVE LEGEND REVISED 9-3-2009 40 20 0 20 40 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM., N.A.D.1927 EXISTING WATER MAIN - EXISTING UTILITY POLE CONTRACTOR COPY PROPOSED WATER MAIN h -?gs Suffolk County Water Authority Oakdale, Sunrise 1769 y EXISTING TREE INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ype ralec EXISTING HYDRANT -�� EXISTING SIGN STOREKEEPER COPY 9 O.1 WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD ZS w C-(1) —a EXISTING GAS MAIN Notes: Reference LV Authonzotions Fle. Sketch By: Date: Drawn B RB JDN Dote:6 15 09 Town:EAST MARION PROPOSED HYDRANT y' EXISTING GUIDE RAIL -AIL restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: rasp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 4 0/ 64 Township:SOUTHOLD PROPOSED VALVE r-, TREE LEGEND BALLOON Specs. PROPOSED PLUG a Contractor: Map No:23T 23 Serv.Order No: of Sevices: Frre Dist:EAST MARION FD ® HATCH IS AREA E WORK -Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT be required Comp). Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order N0: Hydt Project: i Asohalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items Grass Restoration Items: 1\ 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 1� 304.10119917 6" subbase 61302 PLACING TOPSUIL 402,198901 2" base course 402098101 L5" top course asphalt \ 407.0101 tack c t M 12115 \ H12315 DAM POND s\ O PARK 1 k11915 \ ` Q a12215 \ 141 O iS ` O t2 70 ZziP� C� \ � G\ y \ u',X CONCRETE 51DEWALK O �� a�L ROAD - - - - -- - - - - - - - �L - - - - (NYS R 25) N►AIN \_ — - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - 26 - - - - - - - - - - CV GRA55 AREA 1 2" DUCTILE IRON PIPE — � G00' OF A TOTAL OF 2.055' F o ► � — zez _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — STONE DAY l�V,#-o—2 s — — — — — — -- S X 2ns [� U —G—_G t♦28� _ _ 704 —G -� — — \ lS� 69 s (jli k11800 \ 01 I \ n c \ { \\ \ p11930 � '< \ l o t n \ k11600 \ 1 \\ Concrete SidewZt,(k Curb Ramp Items 1 \ item 60801060009` oncrete sidewalk curb ramps \ \ item 608,21 embed d detectable warning limits / \ t LEGEND PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATIO CONCRETE SIDEWALK REVISED O I -25-20 10 N j K REVISED I I - I G-2009B GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN LEGEND 40 20 O 20 40 WATER VALVE REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING UTILITY POLE CONTRACTOR COPY C Suffolk County Water Authority Oakdale, Sunrise Highway — � PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING TREE INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 EXISTING HYDRANT — EXISTING SIGN STOREKEEPER COPY YFe rofec WATER MAW INSTALLATION STATE ROAD25 w9 a� C-(2) c EXISTING GAS MAIN Notes: Reference iv PROPOSED HYDRANT ING GUIDE RAIL —All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations F7d. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:RB/JDN Date:6115108 Town:EAST MARION PROPOSED VALVE EL R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: Insp. By: scate:AS NOTED Sheet5 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD LEGEND BALLOON specs. p j of Sevices: Fre Dist:EAST MARION FD Contractor. Ma No:23T 23 Serv.Order No:PROPOSED PLUG S AREA OF WORK ALT PAVEMENT —Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: gl 9 Grass Restoration Items 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 613.02 PLACING TOPSHIL / 0.0, GRA55 AREA \ Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items: 20302 unclassified excavation & disposal 304.10119917 6" subbase 402.198901 2" base course M12680 \ 402.098101 1.5" top course asphalt 407.0101 tack coat SPEE0 LIMIT / \ 40 T 15 CONCRETE SIDEWALK i 1 Q 2'O _ / #12580 MAIN IN5TALL -o- - / T4 N _ — #12340 LEGEND \REVISED O I -25-20 I O PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION J—L_L CONCRETE SIDEWALK REVISED I I - I G-2009 \ I" = 40 LEGEND OCB WCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN REVISED 9-3-2009 \ ao Zo o zo ao WATER VALVE NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 EXISTING UTILITY POLE - — _ EXISTING WATER MAIN CONTRACTOR COPY - Suffolk Co ty Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway EXISTING TREE PROPOSOPOS ED VATER MAIN INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ro ---�� EXISTING SIGNYPe jecN STOREKEEPER COPY EXISTING HYDRANT WATER MAIN INSTALLATION TATE ROAD 25 wq. o.: C-(3) —c Ex[STING GAS MAIN Notes: Reference fly, Date: Drawn By.RBIJDN Date:6115/09 Town:EAST MARION EXISTING GUIDE RAIL PROPOSED HYDRANT -All reStorOtion On N.Y.$. AuMorizafions Fld. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld PrepSketch By: Insp. By: SCaIe:AS NOTED Sheet 6 0f 64 Township: PROPOSED VALVE specs. TREE LEGEND BALLOON Contractor: Mop No:13T 2.3 Serv.Order No: / o/ Sevices: Fire Dist EAST MARION FD PROPOSED PLUG ® HATCH IS AREA WORK v -tVe r bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order Na: Main Project IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT be required Con pl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: DIRECTIONAL DRILL 45 OF A TOTAL OF 43U Of 12" F1.D.P.E. LEGEND N START OF DIRECTIONAL DRILL EXISTING UTILITY POLE lt� EXISTING TREE Grass Restoration Items: E / � EXISTING SIGN 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 7 'q 1 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL / // 22 a EXISTING GAS MAIN �h/ �q>C'c0O EXISTING GUIDE RAIL L� 7' \/ N10235 / T�I TREE LEGEND BALLOON 7 �c s \ 1 2" VALVE 4 BOX / HgTCH IS AREA OF WORK ® IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT J y 2 X�o Asphalt DrivewayApron RestoratNor Items 203.02 unclassified excavation & di LW posal j / / � 304,10119917 6" subbase 402198901 2" base course ` 7 / ¢` 7 \ 50 �02098101 1.5" top course asphalt iS �� 4a\101 tack coat i � x / EXIST. DRIVEWAY 0 � �� \ ♦ / / gd \ CONCRETE 51DEWALK / y s \ �4/x 4 70 Q \ 7 ` D / O / #12220 ' 0 o, \ B12936 \ OPQ/ // Ohh \ RA55 AREA s STATELAW / / rlr' swoa � eus �r4 \\\ yy EXISTING SEA WALL �x �1 u. U \ / k �/ ➢O aj e6/ \ \. H12960 \ � umw/N6T / As halt rl(cewa ron Restora 7 O ♦ 203.02 unclassifie excavation/ ur 304.10119917 6" subbase 402198901 2" base course a / / 402.098101 15' top course asphalt S 407.0101 tack coat s PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION lc-, / ' LEGEND REVISED 01 -25-20I0 T9 l" = 4d O REVISED I I - 16-2 009 ? N.� LJ._1_ CONCRETE SIDEWALK REVISED 9-3-2009 x�p 40 20 O 20 40 7 G GCB GCB EXISTING LATCH BASIN LEACH BASIN NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 CP� / EATER VALVE CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority o EXISTING EATER RAIN INSPECTOR COPY 4060 Sunrise Highway EXISTING Oakdale, NY 11769 PROPOSED EATER MAIN We of rojec wg. o.: p STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-(4) 1 EXISTING HYDRANT Notes: ARe tenons Fla. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:RBIJDN Date:6115/09 Town:EAST MARION —All restoration on N.Y.S. PROPOSED HYDRANT R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 7 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD PROPOSED VALVE specs. Contractor: Map No:23T 23t Serv.Order No: I of Sevices: fire Dist:EAST MARION FO y PROPOSED PLUG —Mist. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Ober No: Main Project: be required Compl. Dwg. By. Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: LEGEND EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING TREE Grass Restoration Items% , / ti� �--�� EXISTING SIGN 6100203 ESTABLISHING TURF / / �a9 a— EXISTING GAS MAIN 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL ��jj�� � g 2yx EXISTING GUIDE RAIL .y 9 T 1 \�� / �O T,t TREE LEGEND BALLOON 27 / /�`� / // ® HATCH IS ARE �ORK / IN C�✓/!� J PAVEMENT / S ze / `� / / Grass Restoration Items: 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF �� //y 0 Q' //��/ 613,02 PLACING TOPSOIL o 12'VALVE 4 Box / y O��x j `0 / EXISTING SEA WALL ,ti / / 0 25 24 / ^' // I / ,xp STRAWBALES AND SILT FENCE SPEEa za / Io` / STRAWBALES AND SILT FENCE yr/ / / , AS PER DEC PERMIT NUMBER AS PER DEC PERMIT NUMBERAt," 40 23 P• 1-4700-00010/0064-0 ;a 221 1-4700-00010/0064-0 40 P , O Q / r-t /O�xpp / 0 T-t / /END OF DIRECTIONAL DRILL OF A TOTAL 0 / O / / EXISTING SEA WALL OF 430'OF 1 2' H.D.P.E. 2t / //gh / �\ T t 3t / QP/ / 5TART OF ALTERNATE (# 1) 20 / / / 30 O DIRECTIONAL DRILL OF 1 2' H.D.P.E. OF A TOTAL OF 1 245' T t Ten // T t -I / g/ p 9 xp0 / za / �/ ' DIRECTIONAL DRILL 65'OF A TOTAL 18 LEGEND 65 / / OF 430'OF 1 2' H.D.P.E. ¢/ / / / / / CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6C2 MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN 1 17-1 // / U/F/ j / — WATER VALVE pp Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items' Q'yf/ EXISTING WATER MAIN 6x / 49010 milling Item � ' - PROPOSED WATER MAIN 7 ti 203,02 unclassified excavation &j dis osal P 71P, EXISTING HY➢RANT 304.10119917 6" subbase 402 378901 5" base coursell PROPOSED HYDRANT / 40 402.198901 2.5" binder course d� / PROPOSED VALVE / 402,098101 2' top course asphalt / a 407.0101 tack coat s29 V PROPOSED PLOD (9 2 o PROPOSED WATER MAIN LIATION INSTA 0 x If REVISED 0 I -25-2O I O 0 REVI5ED I I - 16-2009 I = 40 �y REVISED 9-3-2009 40 20 0 20 40 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.O.1927 E's CONTRACTOR COPY C Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Su NYe1 Highway r9 INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, 2`r"o EXISTING SEA WALL STOREKEEPER COPY ype Or Project WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD25 wg. o.: C-(S) Notes: Reference Flo. Sketch By:RB1JDN Date:B115�09 Town:EAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations BY: Dote: Drawn I R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Reld Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED SheetB Of 64 TownshiP:SOUTHOLD specs. Contractor: Map No:23T 23 Senr0rder No: [ of Sevices: Rre Oist:EAST MARION FD -Misc. bends & offsets ma ---::A y be required In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: Cannot. Owg. By: Date: HydI Order No: Hydt Project: li Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items 1\ 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal lr �'V 304,10119917 6" subbase �1 9` 402.198901 2' base course 402.098101 1.5" top course asphalt 30 // � 407,0101 tack coat ,{ a CID Y / 9 O�cr4? \` Grass Restoration Items: ` Q % , XQ Q END Of ALTERNATE(Y 1) y 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF / ��� / / 2 ry TIION O ILTOTALOF 1245'613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL / \� / Grass Restoration Items: Q 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF / /G / \Qoa Na7 61302 PLACING TOPSOIL 130.1 132 � k / / Q / . 3 /EXISTING SEA WALL / STRAWBALES AND SILT FENCE 0 / ' / / , / AS PER DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4700-00010/0064-0 / /�6 / / �0 STRAWBALES AND SILT FENCE e 04 �Xo° / AS PER DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4700-00010/0064-0 EXISTING SEA WALL 259 / / � / / / LEGEND / CONCRETE SIDEWALK @CB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN WATER VALVE EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN Cl EXISTING HYDRANT PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED VALVE / / r PROPOSED PLUG EXISTING SEA WALL Sac ' REVI5ED 01 -25-2010 PROP05ED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION 9 REVISED I I - 16-2009 i " = 40 LEGEND'9 REVISED 9-3-2009 40 20 O 20 40 vp —o— EXISTING UTILITY POLE NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.0.1927 XQo EXISTING TREE CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway �— EXISTING SIGN INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 a— EXISTING GAS MAIN STOREKEEPER Copy ype ur Project WATER MAININSTALLATION 6STATEROAD25 w9. o.. C-(6) Notes: Reference Flat. Sketch EXISTING GUIDE RAIL Authorizations BY: Date: Drawn By:RB JDN Date:6 1 —All restoration on N.YS. � / 5109 Town:EAST MARION T-i TREE LEGEND BALLOON R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Insp. By: scale:A,S NOTED Sheet 9 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD � specs. ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK Contractor: Map No:23T 23 SemOrder No: I of Semes: Fire Dist:EAST MARION ED IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT —Mist. bends & offsets may Main Project: Y In Service Date: Main Order No: be required Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Nydt Order Na: Hydt Project: Gross Restoration TtePlsr LOCATION OF H15TORICAL BENJAMIN FRANKLIN P05TAL MILE 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF MARKER(025)SEE GENERAL NOTES N36 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL 12" VALVE 4 BOX �a Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoratlon It msr ��Zhl o • c+� 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal G) START OF ALTERNATE (Y 2) 402,19ll9917 6' subbase �'� /�O�% c7'a DIRECTIONAL DRILL OF 402.098101 2 base course ` i o��� / 7 1 2" H.D.P.E. Of A TOTAL OF 3755' 402,098101 1,5' top course asphalt /pv/ '� c+ 407.0101 tack coat >C o *000 Gross Restoration Iterasr -' z;S// / 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF` 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL ot I► \O\ NA 32 r' EXISTING SEA WALL /J / EXISTING SEA WALL EYisT oRit ` , / pA� / / T-1 / O� u 02 P/ / / LEGEND R / Ui-0- 33 / / / - / � CONCRETE SIDEWALK �� / , OCB mca EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN EXISTING SEA WALL �j / jTaa / / — WATER VALVE / / / EXISTING WATER NADR / ` �`y A. ,- Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items P/ / / / PROPOSED WATER HAM T 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal / e4� 304,10119917 6' subbase / % PRIED HYDRANT 00 402.198901 2' base course �'o / EXISTING SEA WALL — PROPOSED VALVE 402.098101 1.5' top course asphalt y r PROPOSED PLUG 407.0101 tack coat �� , REVISED 02- 10-2010 PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION REVISED 0 1 -25-20 I 0 I , _ 40' LEGEND REVISED I I - I G-2009 " REV15ED 9-3-2009 40 20 0 20 40 E)OSTIM UTILITY POLE NOTE COORDINATE SWELL• N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET U. ZONE 3104• DATUM. NAD.1927 _ °°NTRACTOR COPY [ Suffolk County Water Authority EXISTIIIG TREE 4060 Sunrise Hi hway EXISTING SIM INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11 69 _a_ E)asTBRG GAS MAIN STOREKEEPER COPY DID* WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-(7) ts ExrORG GUIDE RAIL Notes` A�o a u Sketch—All restoration on N.Y.S W. Data Drum W.RB/JDN 04t&6/15/09 Toen:EAST MARION ® TREE t BA �� R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field weP ey: map. itr scdsAS NOTED snot 10 0T 64 To specs. wnddlr SOUTHOLD HATCH IS AREA ff' VOW Corrhodar. Dap Nr23T 23L Serr.Ordar Nr I of Seeker Fhe Oho EAST MARION FD IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT —Misc. bends de offsets may In Swvko Date; Alan Order W- Vainbe required Co .w OrB. 91' Dade IITdt Order Mo: Hydt Project Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal PROPOSED POLE & UNDERGROUND PRIMARY ELECTRIC CABLE & 304.10119917 6' subbase �'V i 402.198901 2" base course c� 402.098101 1.5" top course asphalt �, ��� GAS MAIN TO SHIFT TO NORTH 407.0101 tack coat �j / LF SINE OF SR25 CONTRACTOR & Grass Restoration Items �� /// ,� S.C.W.A. TO COORDINATE WITH 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF �' / \Q� 9 NATIONAL GRID 1 aryTc 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL 1l h �� / �\�0 / oo 4Q Lf 1c4 DrivewayA ran�Restoration Items: s� , 203,02 unclassifie excavation & disposal S.C.W.A. Will Match aterial in-kind Asphalt Driveway Ard Rstrtion Items'203.02 unclassified ex a ation & disposal 30410119917 6" If 402.198901 2' base coursft 402 098101 1.5' top course a phalt 407.0101 tack coat / � Grass Restoration Items: / 0�/ \ / /o� // 6100203 ESTABLISHING TURF j/ / / 61302 PLACING TOPSOIL S. / S EXISTING SEA WALL 8> p� E A / 0) ' Asohalt Driveway Aaron Restoration Items `a �-- j 20302 unclassified excavation & disposal 304,10119917 6" subbase / 402198901 2" base course T-I 402.098101 L5' top course asphalt 36 X '�0%, // / 4070101 tack coat T-I J , 35 LEGEND 25 4 // / , ' —1LL CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1 COMCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items: 490.10 milling Item/ — WATER VALVE \,_�~/ / /' S / F 203.02 unclassified excavation & dispos EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN 30410119917 6' subbase N� 402,378901 5' base course '>•',� i EXISTING HYDRANT 'may �/ 402.198901 2.5' binder course T PROPOSED HYDRANT 402,098101 2` top course asphalt , �i,G 407,0101 tack coat PROPOSED VALVE 'EXISTING SEA WALL PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION s' N9 r PROPOSED PLUG UVI5ED 01 -25-201 O 11 l„ = 40 t, LEGEND REVI5ED I I - 16-2009 s X x o0 40 20 0 20 40 0O 0- EXISTING UTILITY POLE REVI5ED 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.t. ZONE J104; DATUM: N.A.0.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY EXISTING TREE Cj _�' Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway EXISTING SIGN INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ype ro)ec w c EXISTING cqs MAIN STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 g o. C-(8) Notes: Reference Fld. Sketch EXISTING GUIDE RAIL —All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations By: Date: Drawn By:R91JDN Date:6/15/09 Town:EAST MARION r-i TREE LEGEND BALLOON By R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: InsP. : Scale:AS NOTED Sheet II Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD specs. ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK Contractor: Map No:23T 23t Serv.Order No: I of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT —Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Comp). Dwq. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: r Lt h N� ST9 / �8xoo `f4 cN LIN E ST (/� ff/ a4r •� '� o 2 `�/ iaa / / / 45 40 39 / \ 43' Grass Restoration 6100203 ESTABLISHING TURF Ite s ` -, h ` Grass Restoration It vs -, 38 / // 61302 PLACING TOPSOIL �- o° / 6100203 ESTABLISHING RF 37 / / \ /o 613,02 PLACING TOPSOILLop 'P/ /o / h a, LEGEND �� // xo CUNCRETE SIDEWALK As�halt Driveway Apron Restoration Items; \ ALB GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN �// 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal / ` — WATER VALVE 304,10119917 6' subbase 402.198901 2' b ' PROPOSED WATER MAIN WATER MAIN EXISTING course / / / 402,098101 1.5' top course asphalt / / 4/ \\ 407,0101 tack coat ro / / / EXISTING HYDRANT $ / PROPOSED HYDRANT / ° /� / Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items! EYf T p /u~j� Z / A / 90.10 fulling item Rf�h1y4y / /2 Q/ — PROPOSED VALVE / h 2402 unclassified excavation & disposal /� V PROPOSED PLUG 304. 0119917 6' subbase / 402. 8901 5' base course / l / / 402,198901 2.5' binder course RTCIt PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION 1°AdgA / 402.0981'01 2' top course asphalt Ltt e 407,0101 �ack coat REVISED O 1 -25-201 O sT9 I = 40' REVISED I I - 16-2009 SBx ` LEGEND RE 40 20 0 20 40 REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE. COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 EXISTING UTILITY POLE CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway Oakdale, NY 11769 EXISTING TREE INSPECTOR COPY ype oec / y EXISTING SIGN STOREKEEPER coPr WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 w9. C-(9) c EXISTING GAS MAIN Notes: Reference By; Dote: Drawn 6y:R81JON Date:6�15�09 Town:EAST MARION All restoration on N.YS. Authorizations Fld. Sketch / sT EXISTING GUIDE RAIL AS NOTED Field Pre 9 R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. p By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet 12 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD \ SRx pa ti, TREE LEGEND BALLOON specs. Contractor Mop No:23T 23 Serv.Order No: I of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD LIMIT E HATCH IS AREA OF WORK —Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: SEAWALL ® IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT be required (PIN 0042,34) Compl. Dwg. By: Date Hydt Order No: Hydf Project: dfq 0CI5T. RETAINING WALLATCy L 44'tNL„STA. (V LLIi A. 64K 00 lV j = 1 6yx 00 \ ~ / t 0/Sl \ / / � 1 -�/ / / s Asohalt Shoulder Restoration Items 49010 milling item 'q 0 _N/ 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal / / / 304.10119917 6" subbase / 402 378901 5" base course 134 402.198901 2.5' binder course O // I I lei 402 098101 2' top course asphalt 407.0101 tack coat / 0/ EXI5T. RETAINING WALL / Grass Restoration items Concrete Sidewalk Curb Ramp Items 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF I� Grass Restoration Items / ? / item 608.01060009 concrete sidewalk 613,02 PLACING TOPSOIL v / /� 6100203 ESTABLISHING TURF / ( curb ramps O1 O 613 02 PLACING TOPSOIL item 608,21 embedded detectable warning limits o/ / I $/ l� Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items / LW 49010 milling item / o UM/ LEGEND I 11 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal / // I LIM0 304.10119917 6' subbase / �p / CONCRETE SIDEWALK // " 402.378901 5" base course TTT 1 2' VALVE 4 BOX I I I GCB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN 1 // 1 402.198901 2.5' binder course // �1 I 402,098101 2" top course asphalt / I — WATER VALVE 47 I I 407,0101 tack coat / / / EXISTING WATER MAIN 47 'I/S PROPOSED WATER MAIN IT �' EXI5T. RETAINING WALL / / / p EXISTING HYDRANT/ ! \T'1 tea`,3q� / /� // II � l • PROPOSED HYDRANT 2' ( Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items: / { / /as �� � 1 20302 unclassified excavation & disposal /2 / PROPOSED VALVE 304.10119917 6' subbase / d/ / PROPOSED PLUG ? 402 198901 2" base course ur // / 233 IF h I � / 402.098101 1.5" to course / � u se asphalt � P� P A C �I I �' Teti PROP/ � 407. OSED WATE 0101 tack coat t R MAIN INSTALLATION _ t z / N s UM T A LEGEND l p / REVISED 01 -25-2010 64fo0 Iu = 40 /i pREpEV15ED I I - I G-2009 40 20 0 20 40 -� EXISTING UTILITY POLE MATC,y LINE `ST CONTRACTOR COPY 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 A EXISTING TREE 6jf00 Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway �- EXISTING SIGN INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ype Ait�__ c— EXISTING GAS MAIN STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 wg a C_0 EXISTING GUIDE RAIL Notes. Reference FId. Sketch By:RBIJDN Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION—All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations By: Dote: Drawn '. T,t TREE LEGEND BALLOON R.O.W. to be done to N.V.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet 13 Of 64 Townsh;p:SOUTHOLD specs. HATCH /S AREA OF WORK Contractor: Mop No:23T 23L Se-.Order No: j of Sevlces: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD ® IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT if —Mist. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Campl. Dwg. By: Dote: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project '', lr 4y STRAWBALES AND SILT FENCE T c� AS PER DEC PERMIT NUMBER y �1 �r 1-4700-00010/0064-0 T EXIST. RETAINING WALL O / ? Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items; xoo 490,10 milling item 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal 304.10119917 6' subbase 402,378901 5' base course / 402,198901 2.5' binder course �_V 402.098101 2" top course asphalt Grass Restoration Items: % 407,0101 tack coat !`2 <1� 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL / QQ % ' Grass Restoration Items LW/ X 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 1?1Q 9 613,02 PLACING TOPSOIL ` // \�O �x wr7 pF 15) / O / , EXIST. RETAINING WALL 25 i o° / /' o EXIST. RETAINING WALL �� / 6 / PROPOSED HYDRANT // d P // ' LEGEND "'r / RoNPNF an cC4 p / / / 22B/ /// XQQ/ j/ / / CONCRETE SIDEWALK GCB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN / b.• / / \ ./ � / — WATER VALVE O� Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items; / / % / EXISTING WATER MAIN Qv / 490,10 milling item / / / — — — PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXIST. RETAINING WALL O� / 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal , / / / / 1 EXISTING HYDRANT 304,10119917 6" subbase / 402,378901 5' base course / ��� / PROPOSED HYDRANT // / 402198901 2,5" binder course o / ��' / PROPOSED VALVE a / 402.098101 2' top course asphalt wr "9 4070101 tack coat V PROPOSED PLUG�rf, I / um C'� / r PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION 230 REVISED 01 -25-2010 T� Z` 1" = 417 / REVI5ED I I - I G-2009 x LEGEND o REVISED 9-3-2009 0 40 20 0 20 40 f / EXISTING UTILITY POLE CONTRACTOR COPY NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 / EXISTING TREE Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway / INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 EXISTING SIGN ype rolec wg. o.: c EXISTING GAS MAIN IN STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAINSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-01) Notes: Reference Fld. Sketch By:RB JDN Date:6 1 EXISTING GUIDE RAIL Authorizations By: Date: Drown LlN�, —All restoration on N.Y.S. / / 5/09 Town:EAST MARION TREE LEGEND BALLOON R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Insp. By: scale:AS NOTED Sheet 14 Of 64 Townshlp:SOUTHOLD `ST9, 6,y T,I 00 ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK Specs. Contractor: Map No:13T 23 Serv.Order No: I of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT —Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Campl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: / OF j2• HpF'E \ / pIRE�tONAI O(tlll 12a 6a GO -I \ so STRAWBALES AND SILT FENCE � AS PER DEC PERMIT NUMBER 25704 1-4700-00010/0064-0 ° Grass Restoration Items: - 4 E PpE z 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF - _ — NPIFE FH.D.F 61302 PLACING TOPSOIL T-I � ' I � � Z•DU�IIEIRO 49 I / 9 L wr 9+00 IT' 48 � � � \ \ 7 � � o r / 78+00 00 152 i / i ' , - LEGEND / 0k00TTT' CONCRETE SIDEWALK QH GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN WATER VALVE � / EXISTING WATER MAIN — — — PROPOSED WATER MAIN 51 / / 00 %' / / / EXISTING HYDRANT PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED VALVE � PROPOSED PLUG/ 9� PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION REVISED 01 -25-2010 i° = Ta G 9 _ REVISED I I - I 2 6 009 3 LEGEND REVISED 9-3-2009 40 20 o Zo ao X p EXISTING UTILITY POLE NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM, N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY EXISTING TREE Suffolk CountJ Water Authority Oakdale,— Oakd Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY ale, NY 17769 ��--� EXISTING SIGN ype rolec STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAW INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-02) —c— EXISTING GAS MAIN Notes: Reference EXISTING GUIDE RAIL —All restoration on N.Y.S. Authonzahans Fla. Sketch By: Dote: Drawn By:R81JDN Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 15 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD T-1 TREE LEGEND BALLOON specs. HA H IS AREA OF WORK Contractor. Map No:23T 23 SemOrder No: I of Sevices: Foe Dist EAST MARION FO TC ® IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT —Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Mom Order No: Main Project: be required Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Rolf Order Na: Hydt Project: lr Q Asphalt Shoulder Restoratlon Itemsr z 490,10 milling Item 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal \� . `P�/(i Z w 304,10119917 6 subbase \ 9TCc = Q 1 402,378901 5' base course 402.198901 2.5' binder course END OF ALTERNATE (M 2) . �.q0 W DIRECTIONAL DRILL OF 402.098101 2' top course asphalt 1 2" H.D.P.E. OF A TOTAL OF 3755' 407,0101 tack coat 1 2' VALVE E BOX 1�kRON p1P ki STRAWBALES AND SILT EENCE � jSaoP �2" H•0"�5� AS PER DEC PERMIT NUMBER D� "eaai ta 1-4700-00010/0064-0 p100�NAV uar Ur 5 50 � � � Grass Restoratlon Items r r-1 T-1 - R 25� _ . Of 85+00 = ' +o 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF r-1 Sb u I (W5 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL ss 84p00 - t0T P'L of 1 j T-1 I _ ' 88+p0 _ 51 82+00 � _ � � � _ _ - � LEGEND I I � _ — 40 CONCRETE SIDEWALK • 1N9Ti ` 81+00 = _ _ KB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN i i _ mil_ — WATER VALVE I Grass Restoratlon Items _ _ _ PROPOSED WATER A�� x _ _ ' 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF tq % ' 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL °ATM H1'DRA+T to / • PROPOSED HYDRANT I I I a10►lal t C _ Sam PROPOSED VALVE + ' � V PROPOSED PLUG 0 REVISED 02- 10-20I O PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION REVISED O 1 -25-201 O I• = 4a LEGEND REVISED I I - I G-2009 40 20 0 20 40 EXMTM fin' POLE CTOR COPY REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE COORD194YE SYWU. N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET L.I. ZoNE m4• a4TUAt NAD.1927 -0- CONTRA Suffolk County Water Authority O Sunrise Highway EXISTING TREE INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 EXISTING GAS MAW CO " STOREKEEPER PY ' —o— ETISTING GAS WATER MAIIV INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 I C- �� EXIs7mG GUME RAIL -All restoration on N.Y.S. O"' FU Svkh BY Onb: Dram er.R81JDN ante6/15/09 [I," m.EAST MARION ® R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Flare Pnp Oy. wµ W. Scd&AS NOTED shot 16 0< 64 rrwdp SOUTNOLD TREE LE(90� BALLOON rrr specs. Coe6oyar: Nap No.25T 23 Se .0dar Ne. / of Sadcaa. ObtEAST MARION FD HATCH IS AREA OF WOW -Misc. bends & offsets may hIN ASPHALT PAVEMENT be required Y H Servkv bets: ,Wye pyr AyC-0. �`9• BK Ode: rlydt Order No. dt Project Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items 203,0 Wining i ifi Grass Restoration Items: 303.10 unclassified excavation & disposal 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 304.10119917 6" subbase 402,378901 5" base course 613,02 PLACING TOPSOIL 402,198901 2.5" binder course I I 402.098101 2' top course asphalA nzoz7s 1 407.0101 tack coat I Concrete Driveway Apron Restoration Items I 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal 608,0101 Concrete driveway I I I � c� o Q / x I II N PIPE QI 57t I 0 i°o° — ' _9 / / / 91+p0 � ' cO — % / I i N I Uxl / \ �a + _ IJ� 11�� ' I — / Gacvsrt 90+00 � — 'W Ff _ . . . - � I A,661 89 p0 I = ' uIr P MAIN / 6� OP ATOTAI _ _ — _- - 88+00 umFt_� _ _ � INSTALL 157 LEGEND ' H � g7+p0 i um CONCRETE SIDEWALK x — GCB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN I I — WATER VALVE CA y i — EXISTING WATER MAIN a Lvr ff— — — — PROPOSED WATER MAIN } — I I EXISTING HYDRANT O — I I • PROPOSED HYDRANT O ' I } ORIENT PROPOSED VALVE V— PROPOSED PLUG I I PROPOSED WATER MAIN IN5TALLATION REVI5ED O 1 -25-20I 0 l" = 40 REVISED I I - I G-2009 LEGEND REVI5ED 9-3-2009 40 20 0 20 40 _o— NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM, N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 EXISTING TREE EXISTING UTILITY POLE CONTRACTOR COPY C Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY o.: Oakdale, NY 17769 Ype ra/ec wg.---- EXISTING SIGN STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-(14) C EXISTING GAS MAIN Notes. Reference AuthorizationslCompl. ch By: Date: Drawn By:RBIJDN Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION EXISTING GUIDE RAIL —All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED p By: Insp. By: SCO/e:A.S NOTED Sheet 17 O/ 64 Township:SOUTHOLD T-t TREE LEGEND BALLOON specs. r: Mop No:23T 23 Serv.Order No: jot Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK —Mist. bends & offsets may e Cate: Main Order No: Main Project: IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT be required yLEL wg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: Asphalt Shoulder Restoration [tens Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items 203,0 lifting item 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 30410 unclassified excavation & disposal 304.10119917 6" subbase 302.37 9017 ' subbase Driveway A ron Restoration Items Grass Restoration [terns 402.198901 2' base course P 402.378901 5' base course 0203 402,098101 Lt3' top course asphalt 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL 402098101 01 2" top course asphalt 61 ESTABLISHING TURF 402198 2S" binder course 4070101 tack coat S,C.W.A Will match material in-kind 407.0101 tack coat 1 l� I I I I I I I 1 i 1 i Q I I ' I I II Ii I p l I I I I #20615 QJZ O I 420775 III ra I 1I II Ira Restor1 atioII Items; m 6100203 ESTABLIS ING TURF F -04 613.02 PLACING TSGIL T-1 C1 I 9' 6 Io~ 5 0 8 (NY5 RTE ROAD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 58 y — APRaN — — ,— — — — sroNE 12' DUGTILf: IRON PIP r, _ uIr_ .� — — — — — — — — — OF A"ZN 97+00 Ufr600 OF A TOTAL OF I4,661' 96+00 `PKON 95+00 — � ' 94+00 _ _ - - - y — 93+00 = — I co o z i ' Ulf a uIr LEGEND OI9T. PARKING Do + - - I I CONCRETE SIDEWALK O I I GCB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN O I I WATER VALVE EXISTING WATER MAIN I PROPOSED WATER MAIN c:::] YEXISTING HYDRANT I I I • PROPOSED HYDRANT I { PROPOSED VALVE PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION REVI5ED 01 -25-2010 v PROPOSED PLUG l e = 40 REVI5ED I I - 16-2009 LEGEND REVl5ED 9-3-2009 40 20 0 20 40 -O- NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104: DATUM: N.A.D.1927 EXISTING UTILITY POLE CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway EXISTING TREE INSPECTOR COPY J Oakdale, NY 11769 EXISTING SIGN YPe rorec wg o: STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-05) c EXISTING GAS MAIN Notes: Reference EXISTING GUIDE RAIL -All restoration an N.YS. Authorizations Fld. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:RB�JDN Date:6115�09 Town:EAST MARION R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: Insp. By: $Cale:AS NOTED Sheet 18 of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD r-I TREE LEGEND BALLOON specs. / Contractor: Map No:23T 13 Se,.Order No: I of Sevices: Fire Ust:EAST MARION FD ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK -Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT be required r_—Compl. Dwq. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: Concrete Sidewalk Restoration Items Asphalt Shoulder Restoration items., N 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 490.10 milling item 608.0101 Concrete Sidewalk & Driveways 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 304.10119917 6' subbase 402.378901 5' base course Grass Restoration Items: 402,198901 2.5' binder course 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 402.098101 2' top course asphalt 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL 407,0101 tack coat I v I I I T-1 81 a MAIN a a I > I I 12»VALVE 4 eox a > Concrete Sidewalk Restoration hers L� �1NSTq m C1 " 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal o R -1 ra i 608,0101 Concrete Sidewalk & Driveways 62 a 99 \ ` a>Z n21445 Cb + o � \ \ _ >00,00 &r O� f \ \ 6 T-1 Grass Restoration Items: - - o � e3 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF E 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL I zzz »IS iO RICRL Reif LW \ \ � \ G U SPEED LIMIT \ 40 LEGEND � PROP05ED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION v` 1_LL CONCRETE SIDEWALK REVISED O 1 -25-201 O 1 I" = 49 a REVI5ED I I - 16-2009 B GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN LEGEND REVISED 9-3-2009 `0 20 o 20 40 — WATER VALVE NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING UTILITY POLE CONTRACTOR COPY PROPOSED WATER MAIN IS County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway EXISTING TREE INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 -� EXISTING SIGN wg, o.: 11 EXISTING HYDRANT STOREKEEPER COPY WATER M,AININSTALLATION STATE ROAD25 C-06) —a EXISTING GAS MAIN Notes: Reference PROPOSED HYDRANT Authorizations Flo. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:RB/JDN Date:6/15/09 Town:EAST MARION EXISTING GUIDE RAIL -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scole:A.S NOTED Sheet 19 Of 64 Township: PROPOSED VALVE T-� TREE LEGEND BALLOON Specs. PROPOSED PLUG Contractor: Map No:23T 23 Sen Order No: I of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FO li ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK -Misc. bends & offsets may IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT be required y In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: Compl. Owg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: Grass Restoration Items; 6100203 ESTABLISHING TURF 61302 PLACING TOPSOIL 04a' - 4� / Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items; 203,02� unclassified excavation & osal 30410119917 6' subbase 402198901 2' base course �osxo \ - Q� L(j 402.098101 1.5' top course asphalt 407.0101 tack coat \ \ >06 O / T-1 " O � 64 / T_1 \ \ 65 (NY 2 S /��T T-1 O \ \ 7 ` \/ 66 Q a22135 r - SPEED _ 9 / \ - o� � 40 6 x�r >OgfO c/B u! 68 Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items: \ 4T 49010 milling item - 203.02 unclassified excavation & disp sal 40237890175' base course / OJT \ \ \ \ ` _ >O9f 00 Ip•pUCT LI e/OPIP_ 402.198901 2.5' binder course 402 098101 2' top course asphalt 407,0101 tack coat // 4f LOW CAI �, o y LEGEND .w"EL;" IX F [� SX OV L.F. �O � CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED WATER M IN INSTALLATION OCB mcB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN REVISED O 1 -25-2010 I" = 4C WATER VALVE LEGEND REVISED I I - 16-2009 EXISTING WATER MAW REVISED 9-3-2009 40 20 0 Po 40 EXISTING UTILITY POLE NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 PROPOSED WATER RAIN EXISTING TREE CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway EXISTING HYDRANT ��—'— EXISTING SIGN INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 YPe rolec PROPOSED HYDRANT c EXISTING GAS MAIN STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAININSTALLATION STATE ROAD25 .g a C-0 EXISTING GUIDE RAIL Notes: Reference PROPOSED VALVE T_I -All restoration on N.Y.S. Aathonzations Fld. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:RBIJDN Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION TREE LEGEND BALLOON R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Sca/e:AS NOTED Sheet20 of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD PROPOSED PLUG HATCH IS AREA OF WORK specs. Contractor: MapNo:23T 23 Serv.Order No: ® IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT ! of Sevices: Fre Dist EAST MARION FD -Misc. bends & offsets may 0 Service Date: Main Order No: Moin Project: be required Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: Asohalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items' 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 30410119917 6' subbase Grass Restoration Items 402.198901 2' base course 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 402.098101 1.5" top course asphalt 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL 407.0101 tack coat I I Grass Restoration Items l 6100203 ESTABLISHING TURF \ I I 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL I I I ' I � I I 23045 I I N ° I 22715 jell 1 THE I f�iJ T_1 T-1 � I BROWN Z HOUSE I T 1 xis roveic��xsrtc I 2{ 77 78 + CD T_1 5 R 5) _ #22325 , O I T_I 74 T61 1 I T-1 73 _ F 72 T-1 QI ROAD W 77°s 69 ¢ T_I T-1 _ — al 0 AIN STOP 7 vB 1 + 114+00 %Ut WON IN37-q(1 _ 'LLj u� c' 13+00 _ APRON 111+00APRON — — _ _ _ — _ _ IBA O 10 1 A STOP Er LIMIT F } ae _0 30 1 Q < \—p, — ' scxooL ours 12 �\ MpyUMOO l 1 .SEA, a W 1 o�s rx�cr \ S l =svie oc I 11.1 22642 /Asohalt Shoulder Restoration Items: THE 49010 milling item I / 00 OMAN 5— 203.02 unclassified xcavation & disposal o #22350 i 304,10119917 6" subigase 402 378901 5" base course LEGEND 402.198901 2,5" binder course PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION 40 .0 2" top course asphalt REVISED 01 -25-2010 JAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK 407.0101 01 tack Coat l • = 40 GCB GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN LEGEND REVISED I I - 16-2009 ao zo o zo ao WATER VALVE REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.O.1927 EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING UTILITY POLE rA// ONTRACTOR COPY cUn_ Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway — — PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING TREE SPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 -�—�—'— EXISTING SIGN ype Projectwg. o.: EXISTING HYDRANT TOREKEEPER COPY EXISTING GAS MAIN WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-(1 8) Reference PROPOSED HYDRANT EXISTING GUIDE RAIL storotion on N.Y.S. Authori2ations Fld. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:RB JDN Dote:6 1 5 09 own:EAST MARION T i . to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet2l DI 64 Township:SOUTHOLD PROPOSED VALVE eTREE LEGEND BALLOON s. Contractor: Map No:23T 23 Serv.Order No: / of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST 14ARION FD r PROPOSED PLUG ® HATCH IS AREA E WORK -Mist. bends & offsets ma IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT Y In Service Dote: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Compl. Dwg. By: Dote: Nydt Order No: Hydt Project: Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items: N203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal 30410119917 6' subbase 304,10119917 6' subbase k 402.198901 2' base course 402.198901 2' base course `r 402.098101 1.5' top course asphalt 402.098101 1.5' top course asphalt o 407.0101 tack coat 10 407.0101 tack coat 'Z VALVE t BOX 11 O OYSTER PONDS oAr T-1 Concrete Sidewalk Restoration Items: ELEMENTARY 81 B 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposa1, 5CHOOL ;9 w 608.01050010 Concrete Sidewalk Unreinforced Grass Restoration Items: Z�jl .00 i x 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL — `(5 'ONe � / /00 209.1901 ROLLED EROSION CONTROL ' j21 I \ .O I { i 22 80 GI9 j LW f N 5 2'� eu siNcss 1^ � / oisrnicr O j/ 011 / ;2 +00 Oft Concrete Sidewalk Restoration Items: 9 00 1 �g on% / 203.02 unclassified excavation & dis osal i + P / � 608.00150010 Concrete Sidewalk Unreinforced o«E�r AL osau• / � � «isro«icu vre / O ,1v _ . 00 01 � UB � 'I \ \ 7+°D _ O O I \ ' - CEMETERY Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items: 0 ORIENT FIRE 490,10 milling item y 203.02 unclassified excavation o DISTRICT w _ anon & disposal 304 10119917 6' subbase \ \ 402.378901 5" base course 402,198901 2.5' binder course NOTE: \ a go 1 402.098101 2' top course asphalt ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MEETING LEGEND 4070101 tack coat \ ` OR EXCEEDING 2: 1 SLOPE SHALL BE o PROPOSED WATER MA REINFORCED WITH EROSION CONTROL REVISED O I -25-201 O R IN INSTALLATION P EXIST[CONCRETE SIDEWALK PRODUCT PRIOR TO SEEDING .AO13E.. ALB GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN REVISED I I - 16-2009 I" = 40' LEGEND _ WATER VALVE REVISED 9-3-2 009 40 20 O 20 40 -c— EXISTING UTILITY POLEN EXISTING WATER MA NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM. IN E N.Y. STATE PLANE FE ET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM. N.A.D.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY _ D EXISTING TREE — PROPOSED WATER MAIN Suffolk Count�J Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway EXISTING SIGN EXISTING HYDRANT _ INSPECTOR COPY J Oakdale, NY 11769 ype rotec c EXISTING GAS MAIN STOREKEEPER COPY wg. o.: WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-(19) • PROPOSED HYDRANT Notes: Reference Rd. Sketch By EAST MARION EXISTING GUIDE RAIL + Note redo/anon on N.Y.S. Authorizations By: Date: Drawn :RB JDN Date:6 1S 09 Town: r,1 TREE LEGEND BALLOON PROPOSED VALVE R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 22 of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD specs. ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK r PROPOSED PLUG Contractor: Map No:23T 23 Serv.Order No: J of Sevices: Fre Dist:EAST MARION FD IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT —Misa. bends & offsets may In Service Oate: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Compl. Dwg. By: Dote: Hyde Order No: Hydt Project: ,, Asphalt Driveway A ron Restoration Items: o 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal T-, 30410119917 6' subbase B0 C� ' 402.198901 2' base course 402098101 1.5" top course ys�phalt \\ 407.0101 tack coat Grassi Restoration Items: ' 610.020J\ESTAB1_ISHINC, TURF a ~ `89 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL "aa§" As halt DrivewayA ron storation Items: T-I � / , 203,02 unclassified excav tion & disposal \ as / 24x ear 1 304.10119917 6" subbase \ BT / / ErfST oR/ 402,198901 2" base course Izlk 402,098101 1.5" top course asiphalt `\ / 407,0101 tack coat / es \ \ , k00 T t Concrete Sidewalk Restoration Items: Bs / 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal \ 9 / /0 608.00150010 Concrete Sidewalk Unreinforced \ T-Iyx0 / u� rH As halt Should\\ Restoration Items D PY^ sa 490.10 milling item 6 203.0 n t 2 u c assified excavation & dis osal 304.10119917 6' subb se p \ / �p / / 402.378901 5" base course/pF P i `\ 402.198901 2,5" binder \course fd- 402,098101 2' top course asphalt LEGEND 407.0101 tack coat T-I 83 /� / �2 / S� CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND OCT GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN EXISTING UTILITY POLE WATER VALVE EXISTING TREE EXISTING WATER MAIN 82 /LW/�\/ --�-L� EXISTING SIGN PROPOSED WATER MAIN 23''OQ EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING HYDRANT / EXISTING GUIDE RAIL / j / \ \ • PROPOSED HYDRANT \T\\REE LEGEND BALLOON + PROPOSED VALVE Al 0R UiP \ �L \ 0�� ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK IN AS HALT PAVEMENT v PROPOSED PLUG U) / ' o z�b� \ PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION � - osr \ -�L \ \ REVISED O I -25-20 I O REVISED I I - 16-2009 l" = 4a REVISED 9-3-2009 ao zo 0 20 40 NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 U Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway E- 'L CONTRACTOR COPY INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 9.( ype rolec STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MA"INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-(20) Notes: Reference-All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations Fla. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:R81JDN Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION R.O.W. to be done to N.YS. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet23 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD specs. Contractor: Map No:23T 23t Serv.Order No: / of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD -Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required CompL Dw9. By: Date: H, * Order No: Hydf Project: �O \ k ` SCHOOL � \ SPEED ZONE As halt DrivewayApron Restoroti Items: a AHEAD 961 971 20302 unclassified excavation & disposal 304.10119917 6" subbase 402198901 2" base cour� 402.098101 1.5" top course asphalt 95 407,0101 tack coat SPEED / UNIT Grass Restoratior' Items to 1 / / 4 / 610 0203 ESTABLISHIN TURFes-5 (�2� . e�.` / / LEGEND �( 613.02 PLACING TOP SDj `®+" '\ / // / / STD \` EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING TREE k / / / \ 9)_ ��-� EXISTING SIGN // / / �.y, \ G EXISTING GAS MAIN \ +ZAZ \ T-41 / / G / ' \ EXISTING GUIDE RAIL 9 TREE LEGEND BALLOON HATCH IS AREA OF WORK T-1 �'/ / / \ ® IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1 \ 93 Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items \ OP� � � 31 00 / / / / LEGEND d 203.02 unclassifie excavation & 304.10119917 6' subbase p dis osal / < CONCRETE SIDEWALK \\ s �� abb\ / / 402 19890 -1 1 2" base course sra e uw a 9z O� \ / / / \ GCB CB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN 402.098101 L5' top course asphalt goNNOTO�� % / WATER VALUE 407,0101 tack coat ON \ P % \ EXISTING WATER MAIN SHOULDER / PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING HYDRANT \ 911 �3�/ / xy As P all Shoulder Restbrat/ Items \ \ \� ' / + PROPOSED HYDRANT 49010 mlllln L3 Item PROPOSED VALVE 203.02 unclassified excavation & isposal r PROPOSED PLUG / 30410119917 6" subbase \ 402.378901 5' base course ` 402198901 2.50 binder course 402.098101 2' top course asphalt \ 407,0101 tack coat \ ` PROPOSED WATER MAIN IN5TALLATION \ UVI5ED O I -25-201 O I" = 40' REVISED I I - 16-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 40 20 0 20 40 o / led" i NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM. N.A.D.1927 �� / / eF CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority Oakd Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale. NY 11769 e o NN / STOREKEEPER COPY yp feC WATER MAW INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 .9. C-(21) Notes: Reference Fld. Sketch B -Al! restoration an N.Y.S. Authorizahons y: Date: Drawn By:RBIJON Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION HM R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet 24 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD specs. 'SV Contractor: Map Na:23T 23 Serv.Order No: / of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD -Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project be required Compl. Owg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: Asphalt Driveway Apron Restoration Items 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal Grass Restoration Items 30410119917 6' subbase 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 402.198901 2' base course o0 610.02 PLACING ESTABLTOPSOIISHING 402.098101 L5' top course asphult� \ x 407.0101 tack coat 6 ` T_1 i / lo7 a Zyoy ' / aQ•e�' ?9 \ T-1 LEGEND TTT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK taCB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN \ 105 / / / ,yy� — WATER VALVE EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN \ 104 1aJ�X / / \ \ EXISTING HYDRANT PROPOSED HYDRANT \ \ tP r T-1 ' / / (� �� \ � PROPOSED VALVE 103 U/P row l \ \ V PROPOSED PLUG 1o2 LEGEND \ T 1 9`- xoo / / / \ -o- ` ' aj6 Concrete Sidewalk Restoration ]terns 101 EXISTING UTILITY POLE 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal / \ EXISTING TREE 608.0101 Concrete Sidewalk & Driveways 100 / // \ -� EXISTING SIGN G EXISTING GAS MAIN 1 99 _\ \/ // / / 16 / Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items' \ � EXISTING GUIDE RAIL 490.10 milling item r�i TREE LEGEND BALLOON 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal HATCH IS AREA OF WORK 98' 1 yx� % / \ 30410119917 6" subbase ® IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT 402.378901 5" base course 402198901 2 5' binder course // / / \ 402.098101 2" top course asphalt 4070101 tack coat PROP05ED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION REVISED O 1 -25-201 O l° = 4a a� REVISED I I - 16-2009 aO zo o zo ao KEVI5ED 9-3-2009 NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority Sunrise Highway �N Oakdale,INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 Ype rorec �.J STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD Notes: Reference Fld. Sketch J� Authorizations �': Date: Drawn By:RB JDN Dote:6 15 09 sown:EAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: Insp. By: SCa/e:AS NOTED Sheet 25 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD specs. Contractor: Map No:23T 13 Serv.Order No: f of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FO b 4 i re bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Alain project: Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydf Project: 1\ Grass Restoration Items o0 6100203 ESTABLISHING TURF _t / 613 02 PLACING TOPSOIL eEEo T-1 21 i \ u 0 120 40 I25GOS T i 119 i \ T-1 110 O�Q\Q� J 117 12. \ T 1 i �\ r-1 ne J \ 12' VALVEY BOX T-1 / ` 114 19 QQ DVI Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items: \ ��j / % � a� e25650 c 49010 milling item 203.02 unclassified excavation \disposal 304.10119917 6' subbase 70 ` 402 378901 5" base course 402,198901 2 5" binder course \ 113 402,098101 2" top course asphalt as3ss 407,0101 tack coat O / LEGEND T-1 \ 112 159 sib � � O CONCRETE SIDEWALK I25235 r I / UIp QO 1 �2 GCB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN WATER VALVE EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN �lk / / q EXISTING HYDRANT T i � c�y �. * PROPOSED HYDRANT .9 / r T-I 110 1- / / \ PROPOSED VALVE T-1 109\ PROPOSED PLUG 108 \ NOX rppS'J, PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION REVISED 0 1 -25-20 I 0 l 40 LEGEND �� / / REVISED I I - 16-2009 let. 40 EXISTING UTILITY POLE `�N REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STOATE PC4NOE FEET, 20 ZONE 40 4; DATUM: N.A.D.I927 EXISTING TREE `�2, CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority Oakdale, NY 11 Highway �- EXISTING SIGN ��' o ' INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, Sunrise Highway 769 c EXISTING GAS MAIN �J STOREKEEPER COPY ype rolec wg, o.: �6 WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 C-(2_�9 EXISTING GUIDE RAIL Notes: Reference Fla. Sketch —All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations By: Dote: Drawn By:RBIJDN Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION T-I TREE LEGEND BALLOON R.O.W. to be done to N.YS. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Ins t p. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 26 DI 64 Township:SOUTHOLD ® HATCH IS AREA OF WORK specs. IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT Contractor: Map No:23T 23t Ser er No .� ord : o/ Sevices. Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD —Mist. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Compt. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order Na: Hydt Project: Grass Restoration [terns 1\ 6100203 ESTABLISHING TURF 1\ Asphalt Driveway Aron Restoration Items 613,02 PLACING TOPSOIL o0 o Y P \ , 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 304.10119917 6" subbase 402.198901 2" base course 402.098101 1.5" top course asphalt 407,0101 tack coat Concrete Driveway Apron Restoration Items \ 20302 unclassified excavation & disposal `\ .2co25 / 1 ' / 608.0101 Concrete driveway �153, Concrete Curb Restoration Items / '��j / / p0 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal CAK"`'B 609.0401051 concrete curb FV150 \ / T-1 129 T-1 / 128 Asohalt Shoulder Restoration Items: y LW 9B / 4 490.10 milling (tern / 203 02 unclassified excavation & disposal s� / 30410119917 6" subbase T-1 402.378901 5' base course 127 402,198901 2.5" binder course 1j 402 098101 2" top course asphalt 407.0101 tack coat T-1 \ r 1 126 ` 125 P 025525 i Q / \ O LEGEND II 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 124 ' '\ LEGEND OCB MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN O / / 155 ' WATER VALVE EXISTING UTILITY PULE EXISTING WATER MAIN T-1 \ ' , ' EXISTING TREE - — - PROPOSED WATER MAIN 123 \ EXISTING SIGN � 1 c EXISTING GAS MAIN Q EXISTING HYDRANT / T-1 i X 00/ ' EXISTING GUIDE RAIL PROPOSED HYDRANT / \ i 5 122 \ / ` T-1 TREE LEGEND BALLOON PROPOSE D VALVE II i "t% e HATCH IS AREA OF WORK V PROPOSED PLUG ,o- S �EE T IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT I5 MIT �� PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION y} ^0257GO REVI5i1 -25-2010 1" = 40 REVI5ED I I - I G-2009 REVI5ED 9-3-2009 40 20 ° 20 40 � CONTRACTOR COPY NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, LI. ZONE 3104; DATUM., N.A.0.1927_ 4060 Sunrise Highway / INSPECTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority Oakdale, NY 11769 �'3 Ur ' STOREKEEPER COPY Ype roles WAS MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 w9 a.: C-(24) Notes: Reference Fld. SketcA 6 -All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations By: Date: Drawn By:RBIJDN Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Insp. By: SCale:AS NOTED Sheet 27 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD specs. Contractor: Map No:23T 23t Serv.Order No: j of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD —Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required _ Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project Asohalt Shoulder Restoration [terns Driveway Apron Restoration [terns 490.10 milling item 203.02 unclassified excavation & / 203.02 unclassified excavation�dispasal Sys o0 disposal 304.10119917 6' subbase To2op7 S.C.W A. Will match material in-kind 402,378901 5' base course / 402,198901 2.5' binder course S � 402.098101 2" top course asphalt / 407.0101 tack coat NYS RECHARGE BASIN # 126 0I � rrtt,, / � S / T Grass Restoration Items: `�2�1/ pa� � / D / 610 0203 ESTABLISHING TURF 61302 PLACING TOPSOIL /Ulk Driveway Apron Restoration Items , �® 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal S. �/ ,C.W A. Will match material in-kind RIENT POIN/ / c,s u l� 1 \ / / LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND p� eca MCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN \ ORIENT / 61x / — WATER VALVE E%[STING UTILITY POLE EXISTING TREE EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING SIGN —c— EXISTING GAS MAIN q EXISTING HYDRANT \\ NOR;TD1 // / / / \ \ \ EXISTING GU[DE RAIL PROPOSED HYDRANT #2616 \ t�� TREE LEGEND BALLOON PROPOSED VALVE p�Y / � / � X0 Q \ ` \ \ ® IN ASPHALTRPAVEMENORK v PROPOSED PLUG rz* � \ \ � PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION r, � � q> iR = 4a i52 REV15EP O 1 -25-20-W 40 20 O 20 40 I I00 / REVISE II - 16-2009 'P REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, LJ. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.0.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY 4060 Sunrise Highway 53 Suffolk County Water Authority INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 �N' / / YPe rolec STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 wq a C-(25) Notes: Reference Fld. Sketch —All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations By: Date: Drawn By:RBIJDN Oate:6115109 To.:EAST MARION R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field Prep By: rasp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 28 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD 6 specs. Contractor: Map No:23T 23 Serv.Order No: I of Sevices: Fire Dish EAST MARION FD —Mist. bends & offsets may Main Project: Y In Service Date:: Main Order No: be required Campl. Owg. By: Dafe: Hydf Order No: Hydf Project: Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items Concrete Curb Restoration Items 490.10 tilling item203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal 203,02 undassiPied excavation & disposal 609.0401051 concrete curb FV150 sT 304.10119917 6" subbase 402.378901 5" base course o} 402 198901 2 5" binder course/ _1 q1 \ 133 _1 402,098101 2' top course as haft F{2 T-I , e s till 407. T 0101 tack coat e O O N 1 TO 26875 ` \ T-t i \ 32 LEGEND u/P OF EXISTING UTILITY POLE O 00 E%ISTING TREE U/I" EXISTING SIGN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING GUIDE RAIL ' U/P / / - \ TREE LEGEND BALLOON 6X / i (p HATCH IS AREA WORK IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT 7 S Grass Restoration Items: ao F Pp� j LEGEND 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF / 1 -1 613.02 PLACING TOPSGIL - SPEED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LIMIT / GCB GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN 45 WATER VALVE EXISTING WATER MAIN e / _ _ � PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING HYDRANT Q PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED VALVE V PROPOSED PLUG PPIOP05ED WATER MAIN IN5TALLATION o D// I" = 4a O- REV15ED 01 -25-2010 40 20 0 20 40 REVISED I I - I G-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 v> � aim NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.I927 CONTRACTOR COPY y INSPECTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority Oakdakd Sunrise Highway v ype ro/ec Oale, NY 11769 wg,STOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 o.: C-(26) Notes: Reference Fld. Sketch By.RBIJON Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION Authorizations By: Dote: Drawn -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Feld Prep By: rasp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet29 of 64 Township.SOUTHOLD specs. Contractor. Map Na:23T 23LISemOrder Na: f of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION FD -Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Compl. Dwg. By: Dote: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: 0 o 12'VALVE♦ BOX \ / - - T-1 / \ . 52 l� �1 150 = 10 11 T-1 147 P` 0 - - Q / /3k0 / T-1 56 - / ' T-I 146 / L \ 145 ILT/ T-1 / / EXISTING UTILITY POLE \ T-1 144 1 / �,�,J EXISTING TREE \ 143 01 / / ' EXISTING SIGN - —G— EXISTING GAS MAIN \ sue / 2)r ' / @� EXISTING GUIDE RAIL III / \ \ / ,,y Til TREE LEGEND BALLOON T-1 T-I P` / - 9 HATCH IS AREA OF WORK 9°j � 141 / ,L A / 142 � / ® IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT 140 - 0'� LEGEND 139 /�koo / Gross Restoration Items, 6 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF c i 16 G/ 613.02 PLACING TOPSOIL T_1 C / O\1 GCB =CB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / LEACH BASIN r-1 137 1-1 \ / / \ Asphalt Shoulder Restoration ItersShoulder Restoration IteMS' — WATER VALVE T-1 136 138 / O / j \ 490,10 milling Item EXISTING WATER MAIN 142 \ 203.02 unclassified excavation & disposal PROPOSED WATER MAIN 304.10119917 6' subbase k00 / \\ 402,378901 5' base course EXISTING HYDRANT uy % �60 - ' 402.198901 2,5' binder course • PROPOSED HYDRANT 402.098101 2' top course asphalt +� PROPOSED VALVE G// \ 407.0101 tack coat / V PROPOSED PLUG 143' / PROPOSED WATER MAIN IN5TALLATION N G - 027300 1' = 0'4 w2? / REVISED 0 1 -25-20 I O y� REVISED I I - I G-2009 �d REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, Ll. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authori Oakd ty Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ype roiac STOREKEEPER COPY WATER WLW INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 w9 G(2'1) Notes, Reference FId. Sketch By:RB JDN Date:6 15 09 Town:EAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations By: Date: Drown � / / R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. AS NOTED Field Prep By: Insp. W. Sca/e:AS NOTED Sheet30 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD specs. Contractor. Map No:23T 23L Serv.Order No: J of Sevices: Fire Oish EAST MARION rD -Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: be required Comp,. Dwg. By: Dote: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: � C.T t 1\ Asphalt Shoulder Restoration Items: .jJ �Q � � � 1 2"VALVE BOX Asphalt ShouldeA Restoration Items: ` 490.10 milling item 490,10 milling item ` 203,02 unclassified excavation & disposal 203.02 unc assified e� cavation & disposal 304.10119917 6" subbase \ 304.10119917 6" subbas� 402.378901 5' base course 402 378901 5° base course 402198901 2.5' binder course T-1 402.198901 2.5' binder co se 402.098101 2' top course asphalt 157 \ 402.098101 2" top course as halt 407,0101 tack coat 12' VALVE415OX 4070101 tack coat \ / \ Driveway Restoration Items: 25� ?�e� 200/ 70 +00 / ` 203.02 unclassified excavation & ��G i disposal ww``.�Gj � �.pU&I \ S.C.W.A. Will match material in-kind / _\ / / 16g+00 u/r 22a / ytodq 12"X 12"TEE j / 0-It / / / i i pie Wf I-1 2' PLUG (WJ) Grass Restoration Items: T 56 610,0203 ESTABLISHING TURF ` 56 00 o \ 613,02 PLACING TOPSOIL \ '� / / 169* i O / UIP 9�\ 155 � A�o / / i 135 `\ T 154 �/ G0 / 25280 OFP/16�X / ID y / ' \ LEGEND Driveway Restoration Items: T-1 203.02 unclasslfl d excavation & 153 ` CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEACH BASIN disposal / / / \/ S.C.W.A. Will match material In-kind / / / GCB GCB EXISTING CATCH BASIN / WATER VALVE 00 \ EXISTING WATER MAIN T-I ' / \ 152 / �66k \ PROPOSE➢ WATER MgIN 27629 \ / % p/ ` \ 2B I00 Q EXISTING HYDRANT DI P\� �P ' / • PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED VALVE 151 / 14- / r PROPOSED PLUG i 0 dDIP PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION ' / - °^°'• REVISED 0 I -25 I O 1 40 / \ REVISED I I - 16-2009 ° LEGEND UVI5ED 9-3-2009 ao 20 0 20 ao d oltrd NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.0.1927 EXISTING UTILITY PULE CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 cyl EXISTING TREE N -0- INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NYe11769 ay � SJ, ype ro/ec EXISTING SIGN ISTOREKEEPER COPY WATER MAIN INSTALLATION STATE ROAD 25 w9. No. C-(29) a EXISTING GAS MAIN Notes: Reference ✓/ �jJ� rA -All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations Flo. Sketch By: Dote: Drawn By:RBIJON Date:6115109 Town:EAST MARION EXISTING GUIDE RAIL AS NOTED Field Pre R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. p By: Insp. By: 15c.le.AS NOTED sneet3l of 64 Townsnip:50UT14OLD T'1 TREE LEGEND BALLOON specs. Contractor: Mop No:Z3T Z3 Serv.Order No: I of Semes: Fire Oist:.EAST MARION FD �� 9O HATCH IS AREA OF WORK -Misc. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Main Order N o. O ® Main Project: IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT be required 9 J Compl. Owg. By: Dote: Hydt Order Na: Hydt Project: ��i�������i��fs�i�il�l�■I/1■■ � ■■1�1■■I���ii��i��i�����i�i -YAA,/=I , �i������i���fi,fi,��i���l■■1�1■■ice ■■1�1■■I��i�i�i�i�i�i��i�i� ilr.T. 7C Tif oi fill m.In�ioil Mi�l lmniii4■Iitlii_iii_i_i_i_i_ii_�_�i_i__ii ■I■is���7i.i1.::i:.1.YLJi�i��iiiii4�ii■�i�■i��iiiiiiiii�l:l—ri�7�L�i..�ii �.. ■ ++rt���Ifr���������i�ii�iiiiiiYa.`��■�i■■�itCWL'IL�iiiii����■■������i_i�s��i\�I�L�-y"��ri�i��iiiiiiir.�■�i�■I�i©OT'�r iii�i� t�ll��■!*fi�!Ii �i����.�.�7f i�ii,�iiiiiii�L.►iL:.liiiiiiiiiiii�i��/iiii li����������_fi'�i�iiiii�ifi��ii���i�ii►T:_.1Li��������� �f�i�ii��fifili��i`,�iiiil>•i�liiifii4J�/iiiiiii�ifii�i�i��ii��i�iif>•ifiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii �ii�ii��i�fi'i�f�iiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�f>•i�i ��i����������i��iiii�J♦i�ii��iiiii�iii���i��� 1 -• I F ] L / a I. • C❑ I a �� • • - • - 11 TRENCH UNDER PAVEMENT COURSES TRENCH UNDER PAVEMENT OR NON—PAVED SURFACE SHOULDER T SUBASE COURSE SURFACE RESTORATION SEE TRENCH PER SECTION 206 DETAILS FOR OR CONTRACT ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION OF REMAINDER OF GENERAL NOTES: DOCUMENTS 1 -0,' . (TYP) UNSUITABLE/ UNSTABLE INSTALLATION MATERIAL PER SECTION 206 1. ITS IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT o (SEE NOTE 6) LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES TO ENSURE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE FOR = THE WATER LINE EXISTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER ,n (IN WRITING) OF CONFLICTING ELEVATIONS. ALLOWING THE ENGINEER * z ADEQUATE TIME TO REVISE GRADES WITHOUT NECESSITATING REMOVAL 7 NOTE: AND RECONSTRUCTION OF WORK ALREADY COMPLETED BY THE * COVER ON MAIN MAY BE ADJUSTED TO CONTRACTOR. BACKFILL WITH SUITABLE ACCOUNT FOR POSSIBLE GROUNDWATER COVER. \\\ MATERIAL j 2 CCONDITIONDETAILS HOWN ON DESCRIBEDH IN AWWAETS ARE BASED U STANDARD C600.PON TYPE 4 LAYING ACKFILL WITH \��\��� Y SUITABLE 3. BEDDING BELOW THE PIPE INVERT SHALL BE REQUIRED ONLY WHEN NOTED MATERIAL ADDITIONAL BACKFILL WITH IN THE OWNER REQUIREMENTS OF WHEN ROCK OR UNSTABLE OR \\j� SUITABLE MATERIAL PER UNSUITABLE CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED. \��\\ \ SECTION 203 4. (VACANT) IF OR UNSUITABLE SOIL CO � �� /ice/ Z WATER MAIN INSTALLATION IN ENCOUNTERED NEAR THE IN VAT INIMUM OF 300m AND A UNSUITABLE OR UNSTABLE SOIL CONDITIONS MAXIMUM OF 600m OF MATE AVATED ABIDE AND o REPLACED WITH S ACKFILL ADDITIONAL T WILL BE MADE m �_ N.T.S. FOR M LACED TO TREAT UNSTABLE OR UNSTABLE S/ 5. (VACANT) NEW WATER MAINS INSTALL PARALLEL TO STORM A OR TEMPORARY PAVEMENT SANITA �CONDUITS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF IZONTAL COURSE SEPARATION CAN,90" AINTAINED, A VER ARATION OF AT NEW OR RELOCATED DUCTILE IRON LEAST 1'-6" BETWEEN BOTTO MAIN AND TOP OF WATER PIPE TRENCH DETAIL SHALL BE MAINTAINED R SEPA AN BE MAINTAINED. THE WATER AND HALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS THE N.T.& C PLANS AND APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE HE CY. BACKFILL WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL 6. BACKFILL SHALL BE INSTALLED AND COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ¢ THE REQUIREMENT OF 203-3.15. � 0 0 7. UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WATER SUPPLY RELATED CONSTRUCTION, ALL I = MAINS, VALVES, HYDRANTS AND OTHER APPURTENANCES BUILT UNDER - N THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED AND TESTED FOR _ _z BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA STANDARD CG51. THE TABLET METHOD SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CHLORINATION OF o SOLVENT WELDED PLASTIC OR SCREWED-JOINT STEEL PIPE DUE TO THE DANGER OF FIRE OR EXPLOSION FROM THE REACTION OF JOINT COMPOUNDS WITH CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE BACKFILL WITH SUITABLE 8. THRUST RESTRAINT USING THRUST BLOCKS AND TIE RODS RESTRAINT MATERIAL (3 JOINTS AND RETAINER GLANDS ARE ALSO ACCEPTABLE METHODS. THE THRUST RESTRAINT METHODS. THE THRUST RESTRAINT METHOD SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY THE SYSTEM OWNER. 9. IF THE OWNER OF THE WATER SYSTEM REQUIRES A METHOD THAT RESTRAINS INDIVIDUAL JOINTS, EACH JOINT THAT FALLS WITHIN THEz Cy MINIMUM RESTRAINED LENGTH. MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE o FITTING, AS SHOWN ON THESE SHEETS SHALL BE RESTRAINED. AND SHALL wo REVISED O I -25-20 I O WITHSTAND THE MAXIMUM PRESSURE APPLIED TO THE SYSTEM. m 10. CONCRETE FOR THRUST BLOCKS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COVER OR NEW OR RELOCATED DUCTILE REVISED I I - IG-2009 INTERFERE WITH JOIN TO RESTRAINT HARDWARE. PLASTIC SHEETING OR REVISED 9-3-2009 BUILDING FELT MAY BE PLACED OVER PIPE OF FITTINGS TO PREVENT IRON TRENCH DETAIL CONCRETE FROM ADHERING TO SURFACES. CONCRETE FOR THRUST N.T.S. BLOCKS SHALL BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 07t ACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Oakdole,u NiYei�769oy 11. FOR BENDS, BEARING AREA SHALL BE PARALLEL TO THE EDGE OF THEFITTING AT THE FITTING MIDPOINT. OPY12. FOR TEES, BEARING AREA SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE BRANCH COPY ya WAeT�R MAW EVSTALLATIONDETA -S 9 a D-(1) (SINGLE LEG) AXIS. NoFla. Sketch By: Dote: Dran By:RB/JDN Date:6117109 Town:EAST MARION —All restor N.Y.S.R.O.W. toe to Field Prep By: Insp. By: $cate:AS NOTED Sheet 33 of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. spContractor: Map No:23T Se,.Order No: f of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION —Misc. benffsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may be r Compl. Dwq. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: PROPOSED STORM OR SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED DRAINAGE OR SANITARY STRUCTURE PORTION OF EXISTING WATER MAIN RETIRED ri 2'-0' 2'-0" PORTION OF EXISTING WATER MAIN RETIRED i 0 t UNDISTURBED EARTH ELEVATION PROPOSED CURB (TYP.) TIE RODS TIE RODS RELOCATED WATER MAIN NOTES: RELOCATED WATER MAIN 1. PIPE SHALL BE A FULL LENGTH PIPE PLAN VIEW TYPICAL OFFSET EXAMPLE CENTERED UNDER THE CROSSING UTILITY, OR THE MAXIMUM LENGTH POSSIBLE UNDER UTILITY CROSSING — VERTICAL EXISTING CONDITIONS. OBSTRUCTION WITH REQUIRED 2. THE RODS SHOWN. THRUST RESTRAINT MAY TYPICAL OFFSET EXAMPLE BE PROVIDED BY ANY SINGLE METHOD IN VERTICAL OFFSET ACCORDANCEWITH WATER MAIN THRUST N.T.S. RESTRESTRAINTINTDETAILS. UTILITY CROSSING — VERTICAL OBSTRUCTION D N.T.S. MAXIMUM JOINT DEFLECTION NPS SIZE PUSH—ON JOINTS MJ JOINTS 1'-10" 0 2'—O" 0 l'-10"/2'—O" 0 3 5" 5' 8' 4 5' 5' 8' 6 5' 5' 7' 8 5' 5' 5' 10 5' 5' 5' 12 5' 5' 5' 14 3' 3' 3.5' 18 3' 3' 3.5' 20 3' 3' 3' 24 3' 3' 3' 30 3' 3' 2' 36 3' 3' N/A REVISED 01 -25-2010 42 3' 3' N/A 48 3' 3" N/A REVISED I I - I G-2009 54 N/A 3' N/A REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 54 N/A 3' N/A CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway 60 N/A 3' N/A INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 64 N/A 3' N/A STOREKEEPER COPY type WATER MAIN INSTALLAIYONDETAS w9 a IL D-(2) Notes. Fla. Sketch By: Date: 10rown By:RB/JON Oate:6117109 T,- EAST MARION —All restoration on N.Y.S.R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet 34 Of 64 Tawnship:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Mop No:23T Serv.Order No: ( of Sevices: Fire Dist EAST MARION may ay be required Order Main Project — bends ir offsets In Service Date: Main Ord No: � m Compl. Owg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: jHydt Project: VARIES UTILITY STRIP HYDRANT INSTALLATION NOTES: CONCRETE SIDEWALK CURB BOX 1. ALL NEW HYDRANTS SHALL BE DRY—BARREL, TRAFFIC MODELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA STANDARD C502 UNLESS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED OTHERWISE BY THE OWNER REQUIREMENTS, THE GROUND LINE MARKED ON THE HYDRANT, OR IDENTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER USING TRENCH AND CULVERT AN OFFSET FROM A KNOWN POINT ON THE HYDRANT, SHALL BE EXCAVATION PER SECTION 206 INSTALLED SO THAT NO PORTION OF THE LOWER BARREL (THAT PORTION BACK FILL PER SECTION 203 SINGLE BARREL EXTENSION REMAINING IF THE UPPER BARREL IS BROKEN OFF) EXTENDS MORE THAN ITEM 204-01 ALSO ACCEPTABLE (IF NECESSARY) 0-4" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE, MEASURED OVER A 1.5< HORIZONTAL SPAN. COMPAC AROUNDTHBYDRANTLBARRELS OR P INROCTOR STALL2. WHEN THE HYDRANT CANNOT BE PLACED IN THE DESIRED LOCATION 2'-0" 2'-0" X 2'-0" CONCRETE COLLAR (SEE USING THE TYPICAL HYDRANT INSTALLATION DUE TO CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE MAIN, THE ALTERNATE HYDRANT LOCATION LAYOUT MAY BE USED. NEW TEE NOTE 3)TRENCH AND CULVERT EXCAVATION PER 3. MULTIPLE BARREL EXTENSIONS ARE NOT PERMITTED UNLESS THE DESIRED \�\\ SECTION 206 GRADE CANNOT BE REACHED WITH A SINGLE EXTENSION. IF A SMALL EXTENSION IS ALREADY IN PLACE ON A EXISTING HYDRANT, IT SHALL BE BACK FILL PER SECTION 203 REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SINGLE LONGER ONE. THE REMOVED EXTENSION SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. \ \ \ DRAIN HOLE (SEE NOTE 9) 4. BACK FILL AROUND THE TOP OF THE LOWER BARREL SHALL BE VARIES COMPACTED TO A MIN. DENSITY OF 95% PROCTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER MAIN TO BE SECTION 203-3.15 OR A 2'-0" X 2'-0" CONCRETE COLLAR SHALL BE CAST RETIRED (ABANDON IN AROUND THE BARREL IN ORDER TO PREVENT MOVEMENT OF THE SHOE IF PLACE) THE HYDRANT IS STRUCK. 5. LATERALS FOR HYDRANTS USING ANCHOR PIPES \\//\\\ LATERALS FOR HYDRANTS LUSING THRUST RESTRAINTSRESTRASNTSE IS PROV O(EDIRB PIECE, UNLESS O MEANS OTHER THAN AN ANCHOR PIPE SHALL BE SINGLE PIECE, UNLESS LATERAL (ANCHOR PIPE PREFERRED) HYDRANT DRAINAGE MATERIAL, MORE THAN A FULL LENGTH (18'-0") OF PIPE IS REQUIRED. 0.2m3 MIN. 6. THE RELOCATION OF AN EXISTING HYDRANT SHALL INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A LENGTH OF ANCHOR PIPE UP TO 7'-0" LONG, INSTALLED AT ANY POINT BETWEEN THE MAIN AND THE HYDRANT. HYDRANT NEW HYDRANT INSTALLATION DETAIL 7. THRUST RESTRAINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS FOR A DEAD END AND AS N.T.S. REQUIRED BY THE OWNER REQUIREMENTS. 8. THE HYDRANT DRAIN HOLE SHALL BE KEPT UNOBSTRUCTED, CARE SHALL BE USED TO KEEP THRUST RESTRAINTS FOR BLOCKING DRAIN HOLE. IF THE HYDRANT DRAIN IS LOCATED WITHIN 10'-0" OF A SANITARY SEWER OR (+ STORM DRAIN, OR IF GROUNDWATER IS ENCOUNTERED WITH 7'-0" OF FINISHED GRADE, THE HYDRANT DRAINS SHALL BE PLUGGED. 9. HYDRANT DRAINAGE MATERIAL SHALL BE #1 OR #2 STONE PER 703-02. 7EHMRMT �T , VE REVI5ED O 1 —25-2010 REVISED I I — 16-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 90' BEND NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Oakdale, NYe11769 Highway INSPECTOR COPY Type Of WATER MAW VVSTALLATION DETA&S wg. D—M STOREKEEPER COPY Notes: Fla. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:RB/JDN Date:6117109 Town:EAST MARION TYPICAL AND ALTERNATE —All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 35 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD HYDRANT INSTALLATION PLAN N.Y.S. specs. Contractor. Ma N¢23r Serv.Order No:p f of Semes: Fire Dist EAST MARION N.T.S. —Misc. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may be required Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: SOLID METER PIT COVER SIDE WALK WATER SERVICE INSTALLATION NOTES: CURB BOX CURB BOX 1. WATER SERVICE TAPS ON A NEW OR EXISTING MAIN EXISTING LOCATION SHALL BE PLACED AT THE 2 O'CLOCK OR 10 O'CLOCK y OF CURB BOIr X POSITION AND SHALL BE PLACED A MIN. OF 1'-0" BEFORE RELOCATION APART ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE MAIN. NO TAPS REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE, SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 2'-0" OF THE END OF A PIPE. a CLASS III, 3'-0" MIN. HEIGHT a o MI t 2'-0" MIN. TRENCH AND CULVERT 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE OWNER REQUIREMENTS, a ALL NEW SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER IN z METER EXCAVATION PER SECTION 206 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 722-06. a o BACK FILL WITH SUITABLE � Z m MATERIAL OPERATING ROD z 3 ALL FITTINGS, INCLUDING CORPORATION STOP, CURB r 0 STOP, COUPLINGS, ELBOWS, ETC. SHALL BE BRASS. IN °' 3 NEW COUPLING TO m ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 722-06 AND OWNER EXISTING PIPE ¢ REQUIREMENTS. _ = 4. CURB STOP AND CURB BOX SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN O THE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY AND WITH THE SNOW O STORAGE AREA WHENEVER POSSIBLE. METER YOKE 5. RELOCATED CURB STOP AND BOX SHALL INCLUDE NEW WATER SERVICE PIPE WATER SERVICE PIPE TO THE HIGHWAY BOUNDARY. CURB STOP WATER SERVICE PIPE WATER MAIN7 EXISTING CORPORATION STOP AND SERVICE PIPE NEW COUPLING TO CORPORATION STOP EXIST. SERVICE LINE 6. THE CURB BOX CAP SHALL BE OF THE PLUG TYP WHEN PLACED IN A PAVED SURFACE. THE TWO HOLE TYPE EXISTING. SERVICE LINE WHEN PLACED IN A GRASSED OR LANDSCAPED AREA. METER PIT. TYP "B" CROSS SECTION N.TS. CURB STOP AND CURB BOX DETAIL N.T.S. SIDE WALK SEE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR SURFACE NEW CURB BOX RESTORATION DETAILS FINISHED GRADE TRENCH AND CULVERT ITEM 608.0101 ITEM 203.02 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION, BACK FILL CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4" EXCAVATION & DISPOSAL WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL w r ITEM 610.0203 D_ O_ W w ESTABLISHING TURF ITEM 203.06 SELECT GRANULAR a a o a_ zZ Df n' ITEM 610.0203 0 OPERATING ROD D z 0 ITEM 613.02 Of O O PLACING TOP SOIL ESTABLISHING TURF L mLJ Ow , ITEM 61102 z a WATER SERVICE -0" MIN I N FINISHED PLACING TOP SOIL a" �t Z GRADE = ID Co d d -O• d ROADWAY I < VARIES VARIES 5'-0" MIN VARIES e e NEW WATER SERVICE /�� d NEW WATER SERVICE PIPE \����\' NOTE: \�i\ a TAP USING CORPORATION SIDEWALK WILL BE 0 TION DISTURBED CONCRETE STOP AND SERVICE PIPE NEW COUPLING TO REMOVED AND REPAIRED TEMPORARILY WITH SECTION � EXIST. SERVICE LINE WATER SERVICE TRENCH DETAIL 1-1/2 HMA. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO BE REPLACED WITH CONCRETE ROBE. EXISTING. SERVICE LINE N.T.S. REVISED O I -25-201 O TYPICAL SECTION FOR REPLACEMENT REVISED I I - I G-2009 OF EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK WATER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL REVISED 9-3-2009 Na SCALE N.T.S. NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY "Date- mayfolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ec Deg. o.: STOREKEEPER COPYTER MAINEVSTAILLATIONDETAILS D-0) Notes: y: Date: Drawn By:RBIJDN Date:6117/09 ToWn:EAST MARION -AIL restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to : Insp. By: SCOIe:AS NOTED Sheet36 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLO N.Y.S. specs. Map No:23T Serv.Order No: j of Sevices: Fre Dist.EAST MARION —Misc. bends & offsets te: Main Order No: Main Project: may be required Compl. Owg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: SIDEWALK CURB 3 TEMPORARY SOIL & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: DROP ON GRADE BOLSTER INSIDE FILTER BAG 1. MAINTENANCE: WITH A STIFF BRISTLE BROOM, FILTER BAG SWEEP SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS OFF SURFACE LIFTING STRAPS AFTER EACH EVENT. FILTER BAG A FLOW FLOW A (SEE NOTES M3 & &4) ' 2 INSTALLATION: STAND GRATE ON END. SLIDE THE SILT BAG ON WITH THE DAM ON TOP OF THE DROP INLET GRATE. PULL ALL THE EXCESS DOWN. LAY THE STRUCTURE UNIT ON ITS SIDE AND CAREFULLY TUCK THE CONCRETE FLAP IN. PRESS THE VELCRO STRIPS TOGETHER. FILTER BAG9 STRUCTURE INSTALL THE UNIT MAKING SURE THE FRONT EDGE OF THE GRATE IS INSERTED IN THE FRAME FIRST o __• '� ExlsnrNc / PRoaose0 THEN LOWER IT BACK INTO PLACE. PRESS THE r PAVEMENT VELCRO DOTS THAT ARE LOCATED UNDER THE LL ISOMETRIC VIEW GRATE SUPS INTO FILTER GRATING INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION DETAIL LIFTING STRAPS TOGETHER. THIS INSURES THAT BAG (SEE NOTE gt & pz) ' THE STRAPS REMAIN FLUSH WITH THE GUTTER. ITEM 209.11000o1D TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER BAG SECTION A—A ITEM 209.11oo0010 3 INSTALLATION: STAND THE GRATE ON END. PLACE FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES NO SCALE THE SILT BAG OVER THE GRATE FLIP THE GRATE Na SCALE OVER SO THAT THE OPEN END IS UP. PULL UP THE SLACK AND TUCK THE FLAP IN. BE SURE 13'-0" DESIRABLE THAT THE END OF THE GRATE IS COMPLETELY COVERED BY THE FLAP OR THE DANDY BAG WILL SEE NOTE 1 NOT FIT PROPERLY. WHILE HOLDING HANDLES, CAREFULLY PLACE DANDY BAG WITH THE GRATE INSERTED INTO THE CATCH BASIN FRAME SO THAT SNOW STORAGE STRIP OFFSET STRIP THE RED DOT ON THE TOP OF THE DANDY BAG IS VISIBLE. 5'-0", DESIRABLE 5'-0" 3'-0" DESIRABLE 4 MAINTENANCE: AFTER THE SILT HAS DRIED, REMOVE IT FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SILT BAG WITH A BROOM. ITEM 610.0203 5 PERIODIC CLEANING OF TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION TURF 1/4" / FT. AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE . . . . .•r. NECESSARY. 6 THE COST OF INSTALLING, CLEANING AND NEW DRIVEWAY REMOVING TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE PAID FOR FULLVARIES HEIGHT NORMAL SIDEWALK ITEM 608.0101(4") UNDER THE PRICE BID FOR THE WORK TO FURNISH CURB ELEVATION BACK OF ITEM 609.0401051 ITEM 203.02 & INSTALL THE DEVICE. 1/4 F1 SIDEWALK 7 OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE ,' r 3/4'/FT 'y4" R. TYPICAL SECTION SIDEWALK AREAS REQUIRED. IN ADDITION TO SCHEMES SHOWN ON 6 a 6.. THE PLANS, PAYMENT FOR ADDITIONAL MEASURES ITEM DESCRIPTION WILL BE MADE UNDER THE APPROPRIATE PAY 7' :t•• ' ITEM. 203.02 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL DRIVEWAY SCORE 608.010500108 TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION cuae 2 —O MARK CONCRETE E SIDEWALKS UN REINFORCED CED GRA DING INCLUDED CONTROL MEASURES DETAILED IN THE PLANS SECTION SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS THE MINIMUM 508.0201 ASPHALT CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AND BICYCLE PATHS REQUIRED. 509.0401051 CONCRETE CURB VF150 9 PRIOR TO AND / OR DURING THE COURSE OF 613.02 PLACING TOP SOIL CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY DRIVEWAY SECTION WITH ALL ADDITIONAL MEASURES DEEMED 610.0203 ESTABLISHING TURF NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER AND SHALL BE REVISED 01 -25-2010 RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL EROSION AND 209.11000010 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER BAG FOR DRAINAGE SEDIMENT DEVICES. DRIVEWAY APRON DETAIL FOR STATE ROAD REVISED I I - IG-2009 STRUCTURES 10 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE STEPS TO PREVENT SCALE t = T-04 REVISED 9-3-2009 RUNOFF FROM CARRYING SILT, GRASS, SEDIMENT, NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.1. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 ETCETERA, INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, DITCHES, NOTE: CONTRACTOR COMSketch8y. ffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway WATERCOURSES AND WETLANDS. THE FIRST FULL 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK TO INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 11 SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL NOT BE EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE rolec wg. o.: 6" THICK STOREKEEPER CTER MAIN INSTALLATION DETAILS D— ALLOWED TO ESCAPE INTO THE STATE'S DRAINAGE �S� SYSTEM OR THE WATERS OF NEW YORK STATE. Notes. By: Date: Drawn By:R81JDN Date:6117109 Town:EAST MARION —AII restoration on N. R.O.W. to be done t By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet 37 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. : Mop No:23T 5erv.Order No: / of Sevices: Fire DistEAST MARION —Mlsc. bends & offseDate: Main Order No: Main Project: may be required / Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: NOTE: ITEM 402.098101 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CARE NOT TO TOP COURSE ASPHALT DAMAGE THE ADJACENT PAVEMENT. AS DETERMINED BY (2' TYP.) THE ENGINEER, ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED A.O.B.E. AT NO COST TO THE STATE. 2 AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER, UNSTABLE MATERIALS FOUND BENEATH THE REMOVED PAVEMENT SHALL BE ITEM 520,09 REMOVED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6" UNDER ITEM 203.02 FULL DEPTH EXISTING ASPHALT M AND SHALL BE REPLACED UNDER ITEM 304.10119917 M (SEE SPECIAL NOTE) PAVEMENT TOOTHLESS BUCKETS SHALL BE USED TO REMOVE TOP 5" -- ---------------------- - THE REMAINING 1" SHALL BE REMOVED WITH HAND TOOLS. ITEM 304.10119917 M SHALL BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT IN ITEM 520.09 EXCESS OF 3" AND COMPACTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH DETAIL "A" N.Y.S.D.O.T. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 203-3.12 ITEM R COURSE � DETAIL "B' BINDER COURSE ITEM 304.10119917 SUBBASE -6' (2.5" TYP.) _ "COMPACTION". Q o.°,o°° Res 4,°ii n°s mo.° .o°•_o °T ITEM 402.378901 ITEM 203.02. UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION —COMPACTED 4" POURED CONCRETE 3. TACK COAT ITEM 407.0101 SHALL BE APPLIED BETWEEN ALL BASE COURSE (5.0" TYP.) (SEE NOTE 1,2,3,& 4) SUBGRADE HMA LIFTS. NOTE: SPECIAL NOTE: TACK ITEM 407.0101 (SEE NOTE 3) COAT SHALL BE APPLIED BETWEEN ALL LIFTS 4. FOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK REPAIRS CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE SECTION A-A TEMPORARY ASPHALT EACH DAY AS SIDEWALK IS REMOVED. MINIMUM 4 WIDE CUT FOR PROPER PERMANENT RESTORATION TO TAKE PLACE AS TEMPERATE COMPACTION REQUIRED. SPECIAL NOTE: CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAILS PERMITS. ASPHALT RESTORATION SECTION 1' OVER CUT FOR TOP COURSE NO SCALE ASPHALT ONTO EXISTING ADJACENT PAVEMENT PG BINDER A. AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER, UNSUITABLE USE A PG 70-22 MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M320, STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR MATERIALS FOUND BENEATH THE REMOVED PERFORMANCE GRADED ASPHALT BINDER FOR THE PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3'-0" UNDER ITEM 203.02 M AND PROTECTION OF HMA MIXTURES FOR THIS PROJECT. REPLACED UNDER ITEM 304.10119917. USE OF POLYPHOSPHORIC ACID (PPA) TO MODIFY THE PG JOINT SEALANT SL-2 BY ffl " DED MATERIAL WITH BINDER PROPERTIES IS PROHIBITED FOR MIXTURES },. 1/4' SONNEBORNE OR EQUAL T (SL-2 BY CONTAINING LIMESTONE, LIMESTONE AS AN AGGREGATE 1/4" RADIUS A OR EQUAL). BLEND COMPONENT, LIMESTONE AS A CONSTITUENT IN A CRUSHED GRAVEL AGGREGATE, OR RECYCLED ASPHALT FACE OF CURB PAVEMENT (RAP) THAT INCLUDES ANY LIMESTONE. THIS a PROHIBITION ALSO APPLIES TO THE USE OF PPA AS A I CROSS LINKING AGENT FOR POLYMER MODIFICATION. I a��^ MIX DESIGN w w o • > aa_� THE MIXTURE DESIGNS MUST BE DEVELOPED IN 800 ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRITERIA SPECIFIED IN THE HMA oo°°OITEMS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE FOR AN oO000�oo ooCONTRA "ESTIMATED TRAFFIC' LEVEL OF 2.9 MILLION ESALS 1/2" PREMOULDED JOINT EV EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION MATERIAL PLAN EVERY 20' DETAIL A DETAIL B CONTRACTION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT ITEM DESCRIPTION 203.02 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION & DISPOSAL 304.10119917 6" SUBBASE COURSE, TYPE 1011 402.098101 2" Ft SUPERPAVE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION REVISED 01 -25-2010I - 09 16-20 402.198901 2-1/2" 19 F9 SUPERPAVE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION REVISED REVISED i I I G-20 402.378901 5" F9 SUPERPAVE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION 2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.0.1927 407.0101 TACK COAT CONTRACTOR COPY IS County Water Authority 406D Sunrise Highway 520.09 - 10 SAW CUTTING ASPHALT CONCRETE INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 type Wif ATER MAIN INSTALLATION DETAILS w9. a.. D-(6) STOREKEEPER COPY Notes: Fla. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:RBIJON Dote:6/17/09 Town:EAST MARION ANY COMPOSITE PAVEMENT ENCOUNTERED ON RT. 25 -All restoration on N.Y.S.R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet38 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGION IO DWG'S N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No:23T Serv.Order No: / of Sevices: Pre Dist EAST MARION I PR-1 THRU PR-11) AS APPLICABLE. -Mist. bends & offsets may be re In Ser j vice Date: Main Order No: Main Project: required Compl. Dw9. By: Dote: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: LANDING SEE NOTE 3 LANDING SIDEWALK & CURB INSTALLATION NOTES* (SEE NOTE 3) 1. THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK CURB RAMP STANDARDS DEPICTED HERE MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR ALL LOCATIONS FIELD CONDITIONS AT INDIVIDUAL LOCATIONS MAY REQUIRE SPECIFIC DESIGNS. DESIGNS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SHEET TO THE MAXIMUM I ON 12 EXTENT FEASIBLE ON ALTERATION PROJECTS AND WHEN STRUCTURALLY FNi1ER I PRACTICABLE ON NEW CONSTRUCTON PROJECTS AS REQUIRED BY THE e.33m AX _ AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. 1 ON 12— �uR—`g RAMF ROAr"DWAV OR FLATTER •I (SEE NOTE 1) 2. THERE SHALL BE A LANDING AT THE TOP OF EACH CURB RAMP. THERE SIDE FLARE (TY') T-0' SHALL BE A LANDING AT THE TOP AND AT THE BOTTOM OF EACH (SEE NOTE 6) y_O• _ COUNTER SLOPE CONDITIONS PARALLEL AND PARALLEL/PERPENDICULAR RAMP. TRANSITION TO ACCOMMODATE TRANSITION (TYP) N.TT 3. LANDING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR OEM. OF A 5'-0"x 5'-0" CURB RAMP LENGTH (SEE NOTE 6) SQUARE. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE AT LANDINGS IS 2 PERCENT IN DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD NOTE. ANY DIRECTION. LANDINGS MAY OVERLAP NTH ADJACENT LANDINGS OR DETECTABLE WARNING TO AVOID WHEEL CHAIR FOOTREST STRIKING PAVEMENT, A SINGLE LANDING MAY SERVE MULTIPLE CURB RAMPS OR PARALLEL OR FIELD PROVIDE 2'-4" LEVEL STRIP (1:50 MAX. IN DIRECTION PARALLEL/PERPENDICULAR RAMPS. LANDINGS MAY OVERLAP WITH ME OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL) IF ALGEBRAIC DIFFERENCE CLEAR GROUND SPACE REQUIRED AT PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL PUSH PARALLEL CURB RAMP (TYPE 2B) BETWEEN CURB RAMP SLOPE & ROADWAY CROSS SLOPE BUTTONS. EXCEEDS 11R N.rL4. CROSS SLOPES. THE MAX. CROSS SLOPE OF CURB RAMPS SHALL BE 2 LANDING SEE NOTE 3 DTA ONASIDEWALK RB RAMP (TY_ PE 4) SEE NOTE 8 PERCENT. CURB RAMP SURFACES SHALL CENTRALLY LIE IN CONTINUOUS PLANES WITH A MIN. OF SURFACE WRAP. O 5. THE RUNNING GRADE OF CURB RAMPS SHALL BE AS FLAT AS PRACTICABLE. THE MAX. RUNNING GRADE OF ANY PORTION OF ANY toµ E�ATIER CURB RAMP SHALL BE 1:12 8.33%. CURB RAMPS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO 1 E LONGER THAN 15'-0" OR M 6. CURBS RAMPS LOCATED WHERE PEDESTRIANS MAY WALK ACROSS THE .,^f. '4A• '� M1�00. RAMP SHALL HAVE FLARED SIDES. THE LENGTH OF THE FLARES HALL �4VE BE AT LEAST TEN (1) THE TIMES THE CURB HEIGHT, MEASURED ALONG NON-ELEVATED THE CURB LINE. WHEN INFEASIBLE OR IMPRACTICABLE TO PROVIDED A CROSSING LANDING THAT IS AT LEAST 5'-0- WIDE (MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF DETECFIELD TABLE WARNING TRANSITION AS ^°.:dyt° THE RAMP TO THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK). THE LENGTH OF THE SPECIFIED IN CONTRACT LANDING (SEE NOTE 3) FLARES SHALL BE BE TWELVE 12 TIMES THE CUR HT MEASURED C B HEIGHT E ED ALONG 1H TRANSITION A SPECIFIED DOCUMENTS E CURB LINE. S S EC ED IN CURB TRANSITION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR TO DETECTABLE WARNING 7. ACCOMMODATE PARALLELCURB BLENDED TRANSITION STANDARD PRECAST THE SURFACE OF ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL BE STABLE, FIRM AND SLIP RAMP LENGTHS (SEE NOTE 73) FIELD CURB RADII IN f7 m SLOPE RESISTANT, RECOMM REE BROOM FINISH COMMENDED ON CONCRETE RAMP PERPENDICULAR TO ME SURFACES,EXCLUSIVE OF THESE PARALLEL AND PARALLEL/PERPENDICULAR CURB THE DETECTABLE WARNING FIELDS. RAMPS MAY BE USED AT THE INERSECTIONS AND MID SIDEWA K RB RAMP/ BLENDED 30F BUILNOSE- BLOCK LOCATIONS. 457 BUILNOSE• 8. RAMP TRANSITIONS BETWEEN WALKS, GUTTER, OR STREETS SHALL BE COMBINED PARALLEL/PERP NDI AR TRANSITION (TYPE 3A) 6,a 1/z em osE FLUSH AND FREE OR ABRUPT VERTICAL CHANGES (21'-0" MAX.). N.i.B.CURB RAMP TYPE 2A 762 1/2 BUUOSE 9. COORDINATE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS DEVISE, UTILITY LOCATIONS, SIGNS, /o N rv.Ta r4( 1535 STREET FURNITURE AND DRAINAGE TO ENSURE A CONTINUOUS J x ( aR SYfaA 1830 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE AT ALL CURB RAMP LOCATIONS. GUIDANCE FOR N CROSSWALK S IS < '<r twa(A, 3050 PROVIDED IN ME MUTCDG TRAFFICS AND CONTROL DRAINAGEGRATES AND UTILITY YACCESS _ µ ra,�� 4570 COVERS ARE NOT ALLOWED IN RAMP WALKING SURFACES OF LANDINGS. u O LANDING (SEE NOTE 3) M R qO @ 6095 10.WHERE FEASIBLE E.G. WHERE R.O.W. MOTH PROVIDES SUFFICIENT SPACE m MITE LANE LINE 7620 TO INSTALL SIDEWALKS SET BACK FROM THE CURBS, RAMP TYPES 2A zo AND 3A SHOULD BE INSTALLED AS GREATER PEDESTRIANS SAFETY AND 5 11,yF 9145 COMFORT. �IMNTLLpp 6ARRIER LINE 10670• 11. AT MARKED CROSSINGS. THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP SHALL BE # i _ 13190 WHOLLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE MARKINGS. THE SIDES OF THE RAMPS U715• (THE FLARES NEED NOT BE WITHIN THE WIDTH OF MARKINGS. R 52 0 .6, ski 12.DETAILS ILLUSTRATE THAT DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE O SEE 8210 'Re . 1i THAT CURRENT DETECTABLE WARNING STANDARD SHEET FOR SPECIFIC ll S 4 AYH+ 21 3 DETECTABLE WARNING REQUIREMENTS. DETAILS DO NOT SHOWW DROPPED 24385 CURBS AT BOTTOMS OF CURB RAMPS. DROOPPEO CURBS MAY BE V: DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD 37430 SPECIFIED. 13,SLOPES ON BLENDED TRANSITIONS SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 2% MAIN STREET (NYS. ROUTE 25) TRANSITION (SEE NOTE 6) NOTE: (ION 50) IN ANY DIRECTION. (TYP') NOT ALL PRECASTERS \\ MANUFACTURE THESE RADII 14 FOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK REPAIRS CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE \\\\\\\ SIDE FLARE (SEE NOTE 6) TEMPORARY ASPHALT EACH PAY AS SIDEWALK IS REMOVED. PERMANENT (TYP.) RESTORATION TO TAKE PLACE AS TEMPERATE PERMITS. PERPENDICULARR SIDEWALK CURB RAMP (TYPE 1) CURB TRANSITION LENGHTS (L) ".s_ W/ CURB REVEAL 9' MAX. LOPE TYPICAL INTERSECTION MARKINGS 7" MI" H to tTz 2D NO SCALE Q• PITCH TOWARDS 3/4'PNENOULDED EXPANSION 100 400 12M 2" Ronownv MAIEROL%' BA At ALL REVISED I I — 16-2009 HMA OR PCC CORNERS.20 B.C.. 1/4•LL 150 SOO 1600 3000 (PAVEMENT OR FRONT h TOP FACES NOTES: SHOULDER) REVISED 9-3-2009 1. EXTEND STOP LINE TO CURB OR EDGE OF SHOULDER IF: .A ne•:-.D 5/E Erp�FAT OR No, 5eras NOTE. COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 wA`°`°I""°° "°`°` Suffolk County Water Authority Highway • NO EDGE STRIPING IS REQUIRED. , - 6' Frestoration TOR COPY 4060 Sunrise Hi hw0 a R COPY • SHOULDER/ CURB OFFSET IS DESIGNATED BIKE SUBBASE ((SEE PLAN a ro ec Oakdale, NY 1 7769 LANE OR BIKE ROUTE. N ' IYPICAI SECTION) - ° EPER COPY yp WATER MAIlV INSTALLATION DETAILS w9 a D47) 2, ND WHITE EDGE LINE At STOP LINE IF: TYPE VF150 r_ • Flo. Sketch By: Dote: Drawn By:RB/JDN Oote:6�17/09 Tawn:EAST MARION (VER➢CAL FACED CURB WITHOUT CURB ANCHOR) ion on N.Y.S.NO STRIPING ON SIDE ROAD (SEE NOTE 4 EINISR oN A11 FAttssuooTH TRANSITION Dow To ABo�cRAOE ENgecs e done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:A$ NOTED Sheet 39 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD PAAD SURFACE AT ALL CURB ELEvnnoN s. SHOULDER/ CURB OFFSET IS DESIGNATED BIKE Contractor: Mop AIIT Serv.Order No: / of Sevices: Fire Dish EAST MARION LANE OR BIKE ROUTE. -Mist. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order Na' MOin Project: may be required Compl. Dw9. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: APPLICATION NOTES: A. THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF A SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALE DIKE 15 TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY AND MAP SEDIMENT. VELOCITY IS REDUCED, WATER IS IMPOUNDED 5' (MIN.), 10' PREFERRE 5' MIN. , 10' PREFERRED BEHIND THE MEASURE, AND SEDIMENT FALLS OUT OF SUSPENSION. (SEE NOTE 1) (SEE NOTE 1) B. STRAWBALE DIKES ARE USED IN SENSITIVE AREAS WHERE CONTROL OF WEEDS AND INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES IS DESIRED. C. SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALE DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A LINE OF EQUAL BALES STAKED ELEVATOR (CONTIOURI. THEY MAY BE INSTALLED AT INTERMEDIATE POINTS UP SLOPES AS hDBUTTED TO WELL AS A THE 80 ON. AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL. 0 0 '^ ENO TO ENO S 0. STRAWBALE DIKE OR SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE USED IN OR ACROSS A FLOWING i i i r. NATURAL CHANNEL. �^ X H Q F SEDIMENT SEDIMENT o GENERAL NOTES: SLOPE I CONTAINMENT ROPE I ,� CONTAINMENT AREA AREA m w 1. SILT FENCE OR STRAWHAID DIKE SHALE BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM TOE IT SLOPE, \\\\` 10' PREFERRED, TO SEDIMENT ADEQUATE AREA FOR SEDIMENT STORAGE AND FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OF SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT AREA. 2 POSTS PER BALE 2. POSTS MAY BE 1?" x 1?"(MIN.)) HARDWOOD, I?" x 39" (MIN.) SOFTWOOD, OR 1.3 Ib/ft ■ (MIN.) STEEL SPACING FOR 4 PROVIDED SILT FENCE SHALL BE AS DESIGNATED ON THE DEPARTMENT APPROVED UST FOR SILT FENCE. 3. BALES FOR DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CUT ENDS VERTICAL, AND BALES BURIED A MINIMUM OF 4". PLAN 4. APPROVED SILT FENCE ASSEMBLIES ARE LISTED ON THE DEPARTMENT PLAN APPROVED LIST. ASSEMBLIES MAY HAVE 4' OR 6' POST SPACING, AND MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE MESH REINFORCEMENT, AS PER APPROVED LIST. POST 5. THE BOTTOM EDGE OF SILT FENCE SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 6' BELOW N SEE NOTE 9 GROUND. THE FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE POSTS ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF ADDITIONAL BALES PLACED TO LIMIT DRAINAGE AREA SEE NOTE 8) THE FABRIC. AND LIMIT MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH (SEE NOTE 9) l MESH REINFORCEMENT S 6. MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS, AFTER EACH RAINFALL (IF NECESSARY) 9'Prfy. OF ? OR MORE WITHIN A 12 HOUR PERIOD, OR DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED. 1 f2p� 7. SEDIMENTS SHALL NBESREMHALL BE DISPOSED AC U AS ACCUMULATION UNS REACHES LE ONE-HALF NE MATERIAL, OF THE MEASURE F4 SEE NOTE 9 5' (MIN.), 10' PREFERRED (SEE NOTE 1) SILT FENCE GEGTEXfILE , 9 8. DRAINAGE AREAS: MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA TRIBUTARY TO 100' OF SILT FENCE SHALL BE ? ACRE. SILT FENCE ASSEMBLY MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA TRIBUTARY TO 100' OF STRAWBALE DIKE SHALL BE ? ACRE. (SEE NOTE 4) 9. THE FOLLOWING ARE MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTHS TO THESE MEASURES: 5' (MIN.), 10' PREFERRED (SEE NOTE 1) SILT FENCE STRAWBALE DIKE SLOPE SLOPE FOR" SLOPE SLOPE ORIZ II LES(R LENGTH(FT�) E(ft)S L (R) H y 9 2:1 50 45 2:1 25 22 14" TOE OF SLOPE 3:1 60 76 3:1 80 76 S 4:1 130 126 4:1 1M 126 L ( ') � > 5:1 200 196 5:1 200 196 POST gpr�y, BALE AETERED IN NRVSH II FLOW EXISTING G ROUND <5A 260 256 5<I 260 256 SF� TOE OF SLOPE 10. INSTALLA➢ON, I.E. EXCAVATION, BACKFILL, COMPACTION, STRAWBALE DIKES AND SILT FENCE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN UNIT PRICE BID FOR ITEM. �aT FLOW -� RETAIN EXISTING -' VEGETATION IF POSSIBLE N EXCAVATE TRENCH, BURY SILT FENCE FABRIC z AND 8ACKFILL/COMPACT EXCAVATED EARTH z w RETAIN EXISTING VEGETATION IF POSSIBLE m w m SECTION w z SECTION SILT FENCE - TEMPORARY 1A STRAWBALE DIKE - TEMPORARY SYMBOL REVISED I I — 16-2009 SYMBOL REVI5ED 9-3-2009 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority Oakdale, Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ype a,ea STOREKEEPER CO LINEAR MEASURES wg. D—(8) PY N_ tomes'. Fld. Sketch By: Date: Drown By:CMIJON Dote:913109E ST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: 5cole:AS NOTED Sheet 40 Of SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No:23T Serv.Order No: j of SeviceEAST MARION -Misc. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: ect: may be required Compl. Dwg. By: Dote: Hydt Order No: ect: J� FIFF NO APPLICATION NOTES: - e e e ee ® A. THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTION IS TO WATER SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING A DRAINAGE SYSTEM SI PONDING WATER WHICH ALLOWS SEDIMENT i0 FALL OUT OF SUSPENSON, e e " B. GRAVEL BAGS ARE FILLED WITH CLEAN STONE RATHER THAN SAND TO ° PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING A DRAINAGE SYSTEM IF BAGS ARE D D- D ° DAMAGED DURING USE. FLOW FLOW FLOW ® e e FLOW C. THE TOP OF THE INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE SET AT THE MAXIMUM DESIRED WATER LEVEL BASED ON FIELD LOCATION AND CONDITIONS. e D D ° D NOTES: e e D e e e 1. APPROVED SILT FENCE GEOTE%TIES ARE LISTED ON THE DEPARTMENT'S APPROVED UST. SILT FENCE GEOTEXTLE SHALL BE A SINGLE CONTINUOUS ® ® PIECE TO EUMINATE JOINTS. 2. SPACE SILT FENCE POSTS EVENLY AROUND INLET WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 3'. DRIVE POSTS A MINIMUM OF 18' INTO GROUND. WIRE MESH MAY BE REQUIRED BEHIND GEOTE%TTE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT. SILT FENCE GEOTEXTLE ATTACHED 20 NOMINAL 3. SILT FENCE GEOTEXTLE SHALL BE EMBEDDED A MINIMUM OF 6' AND BACKFlLLED. TO 2X4 NOMINAL SOFTWOOD FRAME SOFTWOOD POST GEOTE%PLE SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED TO POSTS AND FRAME. ' 4. GRAVEL BAGS SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY TIED. DOUBLE BAGGED AND INVERSELY INSERTED. GRAVEL BAGS SHALL LAP THE JOINTS BETWEEN THE BAGS IN THE PLAN PLAN LAYER BELOW. COST OF EXCAVATION FOR INSTALLATION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE BID FOR ITEM. 5. MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS, AFTER EACH RAINFALL OF ?' OR MORE WITHIN A 24 HOUR P 100, OR DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED AS REWIRED. 2X4 NOMINAL 6. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN ACCUMULATION REACHES ONE-HALF OF SOFTWOOD FRAME THE MEASURE HEIGHT, SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AS UNSUITABLE MATERIAL. 2X4 NOMINAL SOFTWOOD POST SILT FENCE GEOTEXTLE ATTACHED TO WOOD POST AND FRAME (SEE NOTES I AND 2) INLET PROTECTION PAYMENT QUANTITIES DRAINAGE SILT FENCE STRUCTURE PROTECTION A 17' _ B 19' C 21' FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW D 25' E 19, \ F 21' D ° G 21' D n DRAINAGE STRUCTURE D e D DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ° H 26' 1 21' e e L J 23' K 25' L 28' M 25' BOTTOM EDGE OF SILT FENCE N 26' GEOTE%TILE BURIED (SEE NOTE 3) 0 28' SECTION SECTION P 32 0 17' R 18, S 15' T 17' DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTION - TEMPORARY DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTION - TEMPORARY U 17' (GRAVEL BAG) (SILT FENCE) • BASED ON PLACEMENT AT EDGE OF TOP SLAB OR STRUCTURE SYMBOL SYMBOL GB sF REVI5ED 1 1 - 16-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 pe rolec wg. o.: STOREKEEPER COPY ORAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTION D-(9) Notes Fld. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:CMIJDN Date:913109 Town:EAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.5. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: loss. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 41 Of 64 Township:SOU THOLO N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Mop No:23T Serv.Order No: j of Sedces: Fire Dist:EAST MARION - ay be required bends ir offsets m In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may Compl. Owg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: 6" BALES STAKED k BUTTED END TO END (SEE NOTE 4) GEOTE%TILE APRON STAPLES (SEE NOTE 1) MAX. APPLICABON NOTES: A. THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET TRIANGULAR SECTOR GEOIE%TILE APRON ■ ■ ■ PROTECTION IS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING A DRAINAGE SYSTEM BY PONDING WATER WHICH ALLOWS SEDIMENT TO FALL OUT OF SUSPENSION. ■ ■ B. THE TOP OF HE INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE SET AT THE MAXIMUM DESIRED WATER LEVEL BASED ON FIELD • LOCATION AND CONDITIONS. D D D D D D p D D D ° • NOTES: D I. SECURE THE ENDS OF THE APRON FOR THE PREFABRICATED D D ROW ■ D D ■ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTION WITH STAPLES DETAILEDAS FLOW ° FLOW THE MAUFACTU MANUFACTURER'S UTERATUROE.R AS RECOMMENDED BY c DITCH D • • D FLOW 2. MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS, e e ■ ■ AFTER EACH RAINFALL OF ?" OR MORE WITHIN A 24 • ; e HOUR PERIOD, OR DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. D D D p MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED. • ° ° ° ; ° ° ° 3. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN ACCUMULATION REACHES ONE-HALF OF THE MEASURE HEIGHT. SEDIMENT ■ ■ SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AS UNSUITABLE MATERIAL 4. BALES FOR THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CUT ENDS VERTICAL ■ ■ ■ 5. CLEAN STONE SHALL BE 4" OF COARSE AGGREGATE TRIANGULAR SECTION MEETING THE GRADATION REOUIREMENTS OF SIZE DESIGNATION 11 AND p2 OF TABLE y703-4. 2 POSTS PER BALE FILL SPACE WITH 4' OF CLEAN STONE IF SURFACE IS DISTURBED (SEE NOTE 5) PLAN PLAN POST CENTERED IN BALE AND DRIVEN FLUSH TRIANGULAR SECTOR STAPLES MA%. GEOTEXTLE APRON SEE DETAIL A ROW _ ROW FLOW ' ROW • e p DRAINAGE STRUCTURE D D • DRAINAGE STRUCTURE D 3" i0 6" TRENCH • e STAPLES GEOTE%TILE APRON BACKFILL TRENCH CROSS SECTION CROSS SECTION DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTION - TEMPORARY DETAIL "A" DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTION - TEMPORARY (PREFABRICATED) (STRAWBALE) SYMBOL SYMBOL REVI5ED I I - 16-2009 PR B S REVISED 9-3-2009 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY e Projectwg. No.: Oakdale, NY 11769 STOREKEEPER COPY RALVAGE STRUCTURE INLET PROTECTIO D-(10) NNQ es FId. Sketch By. Date: Drown By:CM1JDN Date:9/3/09 TowreEAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet42 Of64 Township:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No:23T Serv.Order No: f of Sevices: Fre Dist EAST MARION - ay be required bends ir offsets m In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: 6" CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL 50' (MIN.) LENGTH MEASURED ALONG c OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE NOTES 1 AND 2) EDGE OF PAVEMENT APPLICATION NOTES: 24" TRANSITION //--EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY A. THE PURPOSE OF A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS i0 REDUCE OR ELIMINATE (TYP) WASHING AREA / THE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY OR STREETS. 30' (MIN) ..,.,. (TYP) (SEE NOTE 2) NOTES: 1. MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO MATCH FIELD CONDITIONS. GEOTEXTILE O 2. A 30' WASH AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL GRADING MAY BE REQUIRED TO FILL, MATERIAL T M TE THE REQUIREMENTS PROVIDE WASHING AREAS. GRADE AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE SMOOTH ORIGINAL "A \" OF EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SAG VERTCAL CURVE ALONG CONSTRUCTION GRADE DRAINAGE PIPE, 12'(MIN.), IF NECESSARY SEE NOTE 3 3. PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE SIZED NTH SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO CARRY DITCH ENTRANCE (SEE NOTE 5) ( ) FLOWS. ALTERNATE WAYS OF TRANSPORTING DITCH DRAINAGE ACROSS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES MAY BE PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE TO PREPARE AND SMOOTH ORIGINAL GROUND FOR PLACEMENT TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PROFILE OF 6" OF 13 CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL ENTRANCE MATERIAL UP TO THE EDGE OF (CUT AND DITCH SECTIONS) PAVEMENT. 5. ALL WORK TO CONSTRUCT THE STABILIZED ENTRANCE, INCLUDING GRADING, DRAINAGE PIPE, EXCAVATION, FILL, GEOTEXTILE AND CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID. 50' (MIN.) LENGTH MEASURED ALONG c OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE NOTES 1 AND 2) EDGE OF PAVEMENT �EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY SAME SLOPE AS SHOULDER 4" TRANSITION (TYP) AREA FOR WASHING OPERATIONS AT TOP OF SLOPE WIDTH "W" V' 12' TYP. ONE-LANE 24' TYP. TWO-LANE TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PROFILE (FILL SECTIONS) /3 CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL GEOTEXiILE STABILIZATION 1:2 SLOPE TYP. STRENGTH CLASS 1 GRADE TO DRAIN FILL MEETING 1HE REQUIREMENTS IN DIRECTION OF DIRECTION OF EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SURFACE FLOW OF SURFACE RUNOFF FLOW DRAINAGE PIPE 7 (SEE NOTE 3) 2 MAX. 20' BOTTOM OF DITCH SKEWED ENTRANCE — — — — — — — TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SECTION LAYOUT WIDTHS 30' ENTRANCE SKEW ANGLE (n) 60 50' (MIN.) LENGTH "L" M AS RED ALONG c OF ENTRANCE / TYPE W c - -.-.-.-.- -.-.-.--.- -.-.—- --.- -.-.-.-.- - _ _I SKEWED WIDTH ONE-WAY 14' 12.75 905' 12' I2 10 120.5 5' I4' SKEW ANGLE TWO-WAY (n) NOTE: 30' FOR CORNER ANGLES NOT SHOWN D IN TABLE, SEE NYSFOR EN 'POUCYRANCES AND — — — — — — — STANDARDS FOR ENTRANCES TO STATE HIGHWAYS, MINOR COMMERCIAL w REVISED I I - 16-2009 DRIVEWAYS 0 REVISED 9-3-2009 w 20 CONTRACTOR COPY 4060 Sunrise Highway Suffolk County Water Authorit�J Oakdale, NY 11769 INSPECTOR COPY J \ o ype ro/ecCONSTRUMONENTRANCES wg. a.. STOREKEEPER COPY Nowt ,3_ Fla. Sketch By: Date: Dmwn By:CM�JDN Date:9/3109 Town:EAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scofe:AS NOTED Sheet 43 O/64 Township:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No:23T Serv.Order No: / of Sevices: fire Dist EAST MARION TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLAN -Misc. bends & offsets In SeMce Date: Main (CUT/DITCH AND FILL SECTIONS) may be required an Order No: Main Project: Compf. Owg. By: Dote: Hyatt Order No: Hydt Project: CLASS II ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT APPLICATION NOTES TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP LENGTH TOP OF BERM 5' (MIN.) A. THE PURPOSE OF A SEDIMENT TRAP IS 70 INTERCEPT SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF TRAP THE NOW EXCAVATION —{� # SEDIMENT IN ORDER TO PROTECT DRAINAGE WAYS, PROPERTIES, AND R.O.W. BELOWW THE SEDIMENT �� RISER CREST ELLVAnON m TRAP FROM SEDIMENTATION. i OG — I ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT B. A SEDIMENT TRAP IS USUALLY INSTALLED IN A DRAINAGE WAY, AT A STORM DRAIN INLET, OR OTHER STONE NE11 2 1 EMBANKMENT POINTS OF DISCHARGE FROM A DISTURBED AREA. LEVEL POOL AREA 1 2 MATERIAL OR SAND BAGS C. SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALT BE LOCATED SO THAT THEY CAN BE INSTALLED PRIOR i0 GRADING OR FILLING CEOIEXTLE BEDDING J OUTLET PIPE OUTLET INVERT IN THE DRAINAGE AREA THEY ARE TO PROTECT. EXCAVATE A: INSTALL BOTTOM POOL 0, MINIMUM VOLUME OF SEDIMENT STORAGE SHALL BE 65 CUBIC YARDS PER ACRE OF CONTRIBUTORY LIGHT STONE EtEVATQ4 L DRAINAGE AREA. WIDTH = 20' SEE RISER DETAIL GEOTE%71LE BEDDING DEPTH 12' EXCAVATE INSTALL LIGHT STONE GENERAL NOTES: LENGTH: 6' � WIDTH: 5' CONSTRUCTION: DEPTH 12' SECTION 'A-A" 1. CLEARING AND GRUBBING. AREA UNDER BERM SHALL BE CLEARED, GRUBBED AND STRIPPED OF ANY VEGETATION AND ROOT MAT. THE POOL AREA SHALL BE CLEARED, BUT NOT GRUBBED. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP (EARTH BERM SANDBAG) 2. EARTH BERM CONSTRUCTION. THE FILL MATERIAL FOR THE EARTH BERM SHALL BE FREE OF HOOTS OR OTHER WOODY VEGETATION AS WELL AS OVER-SIZED STONES, ROCKS, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER EMERGENCY SPILLWAY NON-SUITABLE MATERIAL. THE EARTH BERM SHALL BE COMPACTED BY TRAVERSING WITH EQUIPMENT (LIGHT STONE WEIR) WHILE IT IS BEING CONSTRUCTED. N WIDTH = 3'DEPTH 6' 3, SLOPES, ALL FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 2:1 OR FLATTER. CUT SLOPES SHALL BE 1:1 OR FLATTER. = y TOP OF BERM 4. APPLY ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT TO BERM SIDE SLOPES. 16 GA. 24' RISER PIPE (TYP.) 5. RISERS. THE SECTION OF THE RISER ABOVE THE EMBEDMENT SHALL BE PERFORATED PATH I" DIAMETER 16 GA. 12" CSP OUTLET PIPE 24" —_� HOLES OR SLITS SPACED 6' VERTICALLY BY 6' HORIZONTALLY AND PLACED IN THE CONCAVE PORTION OF THE PIPE. NO MOLES WILL BE ALLOWED WHEN 6' OF THE OUTLET PIPE. / BERM \� vTYy 6. THE RISER SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH ?" TO ?' HARDWARE CLOTH PARE THEN WRAPPED WITH CLASS "A' 'L GEOTE%TLE DRAINAGE FABRIC. ME GEOTEX➢LE SHALL EXTEND 6' ABOVE THE HIGHEST HOLE AND 6' — BELOW THE LOWEST HOLE. WHERE ENDS OF THE GEOTEXTLE COME TOGETHER, THEY SHALL BE m BOTTOM OF _ _ OVERLAPPED, FOLDED, AND STAPLED TO PREVENT BYPASS. TRAP 7. STRAPS OR CONNECTING BANDS SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE GEOEXTLE (RISER PIPE) GEOTE%T I I OUTLET STRUCTURE a FABRIC TO HOLD THE GEOTEXTILE AND WIRE IN PLACE. � � m 8. THE RISER SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH A STEEL PLATE BASE TO PREVENT FLOATATION. j A ?' MINIMUM THICKNESS STEEL PLATE SHALL BE ATTACHED AND SEALED TO THE RISER O1 SAND BAGS BY A CONTINUOUS WELD AROUND THE BOTTOM TO FORM A WATERTIGHT CONNECTION. / 24'OF TAMPED SUITABLE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE PLACED ON THE PLATE, EMBEDMENT J 4 % 4 WATER OF TRAP /° I6 12' CSP D. OUTLET PIPE, OUTLET PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. FILL MATERIAL AROUND THE OUTLET ?' STEEL BASE P L a OUTLET PIPE (TYP.) WRIER EEEVATIXJ AT TOP PIPE SHALL HANG COMPACTED IN FOUR LAYERS. A MINIMUM OF 24* OF OF OUTLET STRUCTURE HAND COMPACTED BA SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE OUTLET PIPE BEFORE CROSSING IT z WITH CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. ENT. MAINTENANCE: ELEVATION PLAN 10. MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS, AFTER EACH RAINFALL OF ?' OR MORE WITHIN A 12 HOUR PERIOD, OR DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL MEASURES SHALL RISER DETAIL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED. (EARTH BERM / SANDBAG) 11, MAINTENANCE OF THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP SHALL INCLUDE REPAIR AND REBUILDING OF THE BERM, PIPES, AND OTHER FEATURES AS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT THE TRAP PERFORMS AS ORIGINALLY INTENDED. TORN, PUNCTURED, OR CLOGGED FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED AS SYMBOL NEEDED. IF DEWATERING OF THE TRAP BECOMES NECESSARY, WATER SHALL BE PUMPED TO A VEGETATED AREA AWAY FROM ALL WET-ANDS, WATER COURSES, AND OTHER BODIES OF WATER, 12. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND TRAP RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED i0 ONE-HALF THE DESIGN DEPTH OF THE TRAP, REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AS UNSUITABLE MATERIAL. 9 SAND BAGS 13. REMOVAL: RIVER CREST qz THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE AREA STABILIZED AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE HAS ELEV. 17 BOTTOM OF DITCH BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED. TOP OF BERM FLOW SAND BAGS FLOW OUTLET INVERT SEE RISER DETAIL EXCAVATION LINE ounEr PIPE REVISED I I -I G-2009 SEE RISER DETAIL PLAN L ccaTExnLE BEDDING PLAN 9-3-2009 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP EXCAVATE At INSTALL (DITCH DAM) EIGHT LENGTH 6'STONE CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Oakd Sunrise Highway LENG : ale, NY 71769 SYMBOL Oakd WIDTH: 5' INSPECTOR COPY DEPTH: 12' Iype Of Project ELEVATION STOREKEEPER COPY SEDHvMNT TRAPS D-(12_ TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP Notes: Fld. Sketch (DITCH DAM) By: Date: Drawn By:CM1JDN Date:913109 TOWa:EAST MARION -AIL restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 44 O/64 TownshlP:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No:23T Serv.Order No: If of Sevices: Fire Disf:EAST MARION -Misc. bends ir offsets may be required In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: iCannot. Dwg. By: Dote: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: 4' 30, TAPER LENGTH TAPER LENGTH TWO NORMAL SOLID YELLOW LINES LANE LINE xLL) (WILL BARRIER LINE) EDGE LINE xEL) gOIRECnON OF TRAVEL YELLOW HATCH LINE(TrvJ IN 5' (MIN.) T NORMAL SOLID YELLOW UNES 4' 30' 30' 30' (FULL NBARRIER UNE) F� F� ( DIRECTION OF TRAVEL �, TWO NORMAL SOLD YELLOW LINES S 10' 10' 10' 10' (FULL BARRIER LINE) HATCHED ISLAND DETAIL SEE PLAN FOR NORMAL BROKEN LANE LINE (xBL) HATCH LINE DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR RADIUS TAPER CURVATURE OR TAPER TYPE W T S L STRAIGHT TAPER STRIPING SIMILAR A B" 15n 2' 10' GENERAL PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES- B V-0 20. 3 12' 1. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE NATIONAL MUTCD C 2'-0 4511 6' it' AND NYS SUPPLEMENT. 4' 10' 10' 10' 10' NOTE TYPE SHALL 2. EDGE LINES SHALL BE YELLOW ON THE LEFT SIDE AND N11TE ON THE RIGHT SIDE IN THE LL BE AS PER PLAN. DEFAULT DIRECTION OF TRAVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLANS IF THE CURB OFFSET IS LESS I� VALUE IS TYPE C UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. THAN 2'-0'. NO EDGE UNE SHALL BE APPLIED ADJACENT TO CURBS UNLESS OIHERNSE SHOWN 2+�+� 2 2 2 2 ON THE PLANS. EDGE LINES SHALL BE PRONGED AT THE CURB ADJACENT TO RAISED ISLANDS(SEE TYPICAL ISLAND DETAIL). YELLOW EO(E TWO NORMALLINES SOLID UNE YELLOW LINES DIRECTION OF TRAVEL 3. MERE MARKINGS NORMALLY FOLLOW A PAVEMENT JOINT, SINGLE LINE MARKINGS SHALL NORMAL DOTTED LANE LINE-LONG (xDL-L) (FULL BARRIER LINE) BE PLACED ALONG ONE SIDE OF THE JOINT. DOABLE UNE MARKINGS SHALL STRADDLE THE JOINT. LANE LINES ON ROADWAYS MICH ARE MORE THAN TWO LANES ALOE AND HAVE LONGITUDINAL JOINTS BETWEEN ADJACENT LANES, SHALL BE PLACED ON THE SIDE OF THE JOINT WHICH WILL _CURB OBTAIN OPTIMUM LANE WIDTHS THE SINGLE CENTER UNE OF A TWD-LANE PAVEMENT HAVING 2' A CENTER LONGITUDINAL JOINT MAY BE PLACED ON OTHER SIDE OF THE JOINT. EDGE OF \ W AT THE JUNCTION OF SINGLE AND DOUBLE LINE MARKINGS MICH FOLLOW A PAVEMENT RAISED ISLAND YELLOW JOINT, THE SINGLE LINE SHALL BE AN EXTENSION OF EITHER OF THE DOUBLE LINES AND } / S HATCH LINE NOT THE SPACE FOLLOW A THEM. AT THE JUNCTION OF UNE M AND DAY BE OUBLE LINE MARKINGS {4L. 2' / g° OFCH DO NOT THE DOUBLER NEO MARKING OR NTH EI PAVEMENT THEERRE SINGLE LINE OF THE DOUBLE LINE. WITH THE CENTER - _CURB 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND THE PLACEMENT OF ARROWS, SYMBOLS, AND TEXT SHOWN ARE TYPICAL T11 AND SHALL APPLY UNLESS OTHERNSE INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 2' 5. THE REGIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL RENEW AND APPROVE ANY CHANCES TO THE PAVEMENT MARKING PUNS PRIOR TO FINAL INSTALLATION, CHANCES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TWO WEEKS PRIOR NORMAL DOTTED LANE UNE-SHORT (xDL-S) L (�) TO INSTALLATION. PAVEMENT MARKING LINE NOTES: DIRECTION OF TRAVEL I.I. PAVEMENT MARKING UNE STRIPING WIDTHS STALL BE INCREASED TO 6' FOR ALL INTERSTATE AND LIMITED ACCESS EXPRESSWAYS. THIS SHALL INCLUDE RAMPS 4" L2. PAVEMENT MARKING UNE CODES MAY BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. COLOR OESIGNATONS: 4' TYPICAL HATCH LINE DETAIL AT RUSH OR RAISED ISLANDS AND AT MEDIAN AREAS W=WHITE Y=YELLOW W� � 3" MIN. 6 4"J 10'I 30' I10' 30' I10' 30' 10'I 24' EDGE OF PAVEMENT 12' MAX. 6' NORMAL SOLID LANE LINE AND NOMINAL BROKEN LINE 6' EDGE a PAVEMENT F (PARTIAL BARRIER LINE) (xPBL) 1B" EDGE OF PAVEMENT I F T]36' r ¢ N 4" 4" 3" MIN. 12" MAX. TWO NO RMAL MINIMUM DIMENSIONS MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS (FULL BARRIER SOLID LINES R LINE) (xFBL) O(TYP) VERSE LINES) 1' (TYPJ (TRANSVERSE LINES) REVISED I I - I G-2009 STANDARD LADDER BAR COMBINED REVISED 9-3-2009 4" TYPES TYPE L TYPE LS 4" HATCH UNE 'X' VALUE N0 ALL CROSSWALK MARKINGS SHALL BE NfiI . CHANNELRING LINE I' WINN TYPE VA B' WI� TYPES ME-B Y CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority Oakdale, NY 11769 Highway TYPE C MHL-C 2'* % 4060 Sunrise Highway 4' 10- _ 30' 10' 30' 110' 30' _1 10'I CROSS BAR LINE)(xCL) 2' INSPECTOR COPY STYPE A NP UN(E ) STOREKEEPER COPY PA{�T MARKING DETAMS w9 D-(1 NORMAL DOUBLE BROKEN LINE (xDBL) TYPE B(xSL-xSL-e) 2' * SM M�RKwIr Fld. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:CM/JON Dote:9/3/09 Town:EAST MARION FOR CLIMBING LANE ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY (SEE NOTE LI) All r r R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet46 Of64 Township:SOUTHOLD *- DEFAULT VALUE UNLESS N.Y.S. specs. OIHFKWISE SHOWN ON THE PUNS Contractor. Map No-23T Serv.Order No. j of Sevices: Fire Dist:EAST MARION SUPPLEMENTAL LINES -Mist. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Pro may be required Project. Compl. Dwq. By: Dote: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: 'i NOTES: 1. THE DETAILS PROMDED ARE NOT DRAWN TO SCALE. THE 8:°veve.... QUANTITY OF DOMES DEPICTED ON THE DETECTABLE i'.:8:::T.7::..8........ WARNING UNIT (THE DOMES AND THE ENTIRE 24• LEVEL GREATER THAN 5'-0• GRADE BREAK :BEe•E:B8mmism: SURFACE) IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. °.'.•°.%°e7.B::EB^: :° DETECTABLE WARNING UNIT DIMENSIONS: 2. THE SIZE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD SHALL BE 24• IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHALL EXTEND GRADE BREAK THE FULL MOTH OF THE CURB RAMP OR FLUSH SURFACE, EXCLUSIVE OF SIDE FLARES. DOME ALIGNMENT: IF LESS THAN 2'-0• 3. THE ROWS OF DOMES SHALL BE ALIGNED TO BE OMIT DETECTABLE PERPENDICULAR OR RADIAL TO THE GRADE BREAK BETWEEN WARNINGS THE RAMP LANDING OR CURB RAMP AND THE STREET. 4. WHERE DOMES ARE ARRAYED RADIALLY THEY MAY DIFFER IN DOME DIAMETER AND CENTER-TO-CENTER SPACING WITHIN THE RANGES SPECIFIED ON THIS SHEET. Al OA 1R CK COLOR REQUIREMENTS: GRADE TO 5. THE DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD SHALL BE THE COLOR DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT DETAIL T DRAIN SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE: IF THE DISTANCE FROM THE GRADE BREAK IS GREATER THAN OF EQUAL TO 5-0•, DETECTABLE DETECTABLE WARNINGS LOCATIONS: WARNINGS SHOULD BE PLACED ALONG TH6jAQWFDF THE CURVE AS SHOWN IN THE ABOVE DETAIL. 6. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE EDGE OR CORNER OF THE WARNING FIELD NEAREST TO THE ROADWAY IS 5• TO 9•FROM THE FRONT OF THE CURB OR THE ROADWAY EDGE (12• WHERE TRAVERSABLE CURB IS USED). SEE NOTE 7 r' 7. THE EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD NEAREST DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT MEDIAN ISLANDS iS=0RMAXIIMUM CROSSING EscENTERLJ E OF THEMNEAREST ..°°..°.°°...........° 8:::::: :::8::°::: ag NON-ELEVATED CROSSING RAIL ::1 :•.89 '880eie 5'-0" OR LESS GRADE BREAK P� SIDEWALK `a p0 ry 1.6" - 2.4" 0.3" MIN. DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT RAILROAD CROSSING DOME (TYP.) (SEE NOTE 1) 50%- 60%OF BASE DIAMETER OL 0000 000000000000 0000000000000000000 GRADE BREAK 1� 0 0000000000000000000 0000000000000000000 DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT DETAIL 2 00000000000000000 0 0 NOTE: IF THE DISTANCE FROM THE GRADE BREAK IS LESS SIDEWALK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O w I THAN OR EQUAL TO 5'-0", DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD 0.9" - 1.4" P 0000000 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 000000 O O O O O O 0 li BE PLACED ON THE CURB RAMP ALONG THE BOTTOM GRADE - BREAK NTH ONE CORNER 5" TO 9" FROM THE FRONT OF 00000000000 0 0 0000000 THE CURB OR EDGE OF THE ROADWAY. CURB RAMP 0000000000000020200000 DOME SECTION 00000000000000000 EDGE OF WARNING FIELD SIDEWALK DOME SPACING URB RAM GRADE BREAK SIDEWALK SIDE FLARES CURB RAMP DOMES(TYP.) (SEE NOTE 1) III.."g- LANDING za• (Tm.) (SEE NOTE 2) REVISED I I — 16-2009 SEE NOTE 6 REVISED 9-3-2009 ............ CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway :«::::::::«::«::::::. e°:??S?se:: Oakdale, NY 1 1769 87:&5::::e8•.8::::::::: DOME CONFIGURATION INSPECTOR COPY (SEE NOTES 3 AND 4) •°°«• ype ro ec STOREKEEPER COPY SIDEWALK CURB &=No: HYdt DETAILS w9. a.. D—(14) Notes: Fld. Sketch By: Date: /JDN Date:9/3/09 Town:EAST MARION FULL RAMP WIDTH (TIP.) -All restoration on N.Y.S. (SEE NOTE 2) R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: No Sheet 4,6 0/64 Township:SOUTHOLD DETECTABLE WARNING AT CURB RAMP CURB RAMP / BLENDED TRANSITION CONFIGURATION: TYPES 3 AND 4 N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Mop NoQ3T : ;( of Sevices: Ere Dist EAST MARION -Misc. bends & offsets In Service Date: o: Main Project:may be required j Compl. Dwg. By: Dote: o: Hydt Project: GENERAL NOTES: F THE DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES PRESENTED IN THE DETAILS ARE THE MINIMUM NECESSARY TO COMPLY WTH THE ADA AND DOT STANDARDS. ANY DEVIATION LESS THAN THE MINIMUM WIDTH OR GREATER THAN THE MAXIMUM SLOPE FROM THESE STANDARDS MUST BE DOCUMENTED WITH THE STANDARDS BEING MET TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICABLE AND CONSISTENT �.. °• SEE NOTE 5 WITH THE MOST CURRENT ADAAG. 2. CURB RAMPS, LANDINGS AND BLENDED TRANSITIONS MAY REQUIRE THE USE OF DETECTABLE WARNINGS. DETECTABLE WARNINGS ON THIS SHEET ARE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. IF 5'-0' OR LESS, DETECTABLE GRADE BREAK p�Np REFER TO THE DETECTABLE WARNING DETAILS ON SHEET 4 OF 4 FOR DETAILS ON WARNING SHOULD BE PLACED ON (SEE NOTE 9) PLACEMENT, ORIENTATION k DIMENSIONS. REFER TO CHAPTER 18 OF THE HIGHWAY DESIGN RAMP. REFER TO SHEET 4 OF 4 LANDING AC�, MANUAL FOR MORE INFORMATION. AND SEE NOTE 10. F P Py �SS i °SS OPTIONAL CURB `gyp CURB RAMP NOTES: P S'FNO 3. THE MINIMUM MOTH FOR SIDEWALK CURB RAMPS IS 5'-0*. SEE NOTE 11 4. THE RUNNING SLOPE OF A CURB RAMP SHALL BE 1:20 (5R) MINIMUM (PREFERRED) AND 1:12 (8.33R)MAXIMUM. GRADE BREAK (SEE NOTE 8) 5. WHERE THE SLOPE OF THE ROADWAY EXCEEDS 8.33X THE CURB RAMP LENGTH IS THE LENGTH NECESSARY TO MEET THE EXISTING SIDEWALK. IT IS NOT NECESSARY THAT THE RUNNING SLOPE (SR) MINIMUM PREFERRED RAMP LENGTH EXCEED 15'-0'. AND (8.33R) MAXIMUM. (SEE NOTE 5) 6. THE CROSS SLOPE OF CURB RAMPS SHOULD BE AS FLAT AS POSSIBLE, NOT TO EXCEED 1.50 2R. THE CROSS SLOPE AT MIDBLOCK CROSSINGS MAY BE WARPED TO MEET STREET �..� OR HI AY GRACE. SLOPE TO DRAIN RUNOFF 7. THE VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF A CURB RAMP, EXCLUDING THE FLARES, SHALL BE PLANAR. TO STREET/GUTTER MAXIMUM SLOPE 2% PNpV%A CURB RAMP GRADE BREAKS SHALL BE RUSH AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF THE RAMP RUN. Stp4P� B. RAMP TRANSITIONS BETWEEN WALKS, LANDINGS, GUTTERS, OR STREETS SHALL BE FLUSH AND pAX FREE OF ABRUPT VERTICAL CHANGES (1/4' MAX) 9. WHERE A PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH CROSSES THE CURB RAMP, FLARED SIDES WITH A SLOPE OF 10%MAXIMUM, MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE CURB LINE, SHALL BE PROVIDED. CURB RAMP WITHOUT SIDE FLARES MID-BLOCK CROSSING CURB RAMP LANDING NOTES: TYPICAL DIMENSIONING TYPICAL DIMENSIONING 10. LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR DIMENSION OF A 5'-0' BY 5'-0' EXCEPT AT THE BOTTOM OF RAMPS TYPE 1 h 2 ON SHEET 2 OF 4. 11. THE RUNNING AND CROSS SLOPES ON LANDINGS AT INTERSECTIONS IS 1:50 (2R) MAXIMUM. THE RUNNING AND CROSS SLOPES AT MOBLOCK CROSSINGS MAY BE WARPED TO MEET STREET OR HIGHWAY GRADE. h p S`0• LANDING SIDEWALK SIDEWALK k FS/ LALANDINGFNc ° `ems/ I �XP LANDING CURB RAMP �— ROADWAY MAXIMUM SLOPE—8.J3Z MAXIMUM SLOPE 5% NOTE: THE COUNTER ROPE OF GUTTER RAN 5%OR STREET AT 7 FOOT OF A CURB RAMP, LANDING, OR BLENDED TRANSITION SHALL BE 5X MAXIMUM \\ COUNTER SLOPE CONDITIONS CROSSWALK MARKING (TYP.) SIDE FLARES, MAXIMUM SLOPE TOR (SEE NOTE 9) REVISED I I - I G-2009 CURB RAMP WITH SIDE FLARES DIAGONAL SIDEWALK CURB RAMP REVISED 9-3-2009 TYPICAL DIMENSIONING n ACTOR COPY Suffolk ttumn Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway CTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 KEEPER COPY ype raSIDEWALAMP DETAILS w9D-0SDFit. Sketch By: rawn By:CM1JDN Oote:91"J'"09To-n..EAST MARION ration on N.Y.S.o be done to Field Prep By, cale:A$ NOTED Shee147 0164 Township:SOUTHOLDecs. Contractor: rv.Order No: / of Sevices: Fire Oist:EA$T MARION nds & offsets In Service Date: ain Order No: Main Pro ect required j Compl. Dwq. By: dt Order No: Hydt Project: NOTES: 0 1. FOR DIMENSIONS & GEOMETRIC VALUES REFER TO SHEET 1 OF 4, 2. THE CONFIGURATIONS SHOWN GENERICALLY REPRESENT THE MOST LANDING COMMON SITUATIONS ENCOUNTERED ON NYSDOT PROJECTS. THEY g SNOW STORAGE ARE INTENDED TO PRESENT CURB RAMP DESIGN CONCEPTS. SITE CONDITIONS AT INOIVOUAL LOCATIONS REWIRE SPECIFIC DESIGNS. CURB RAMP DESIGNS MUST BE CONSISTENT NTH THE o PROVISIONS OF SHEETS 1, 2, AND 3 OF 4. REFER TO REGIONAL Pn O LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDANCE. 3. COORDINATE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, UTILITY LOCATIONS, CURB RAMP SIGNS, STREET FURNITURE AND DRAINAGE TO ENSURE A CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE AT ALL CURB RAMP CURB (OPTIONAL) LOCATIONS. GUIDANCE FOR CROSSWALK MARKINGS AND TRAFFIC 3 O CONTROL DEVICES IS PROVIDED IN THE MUTCD. 0 4. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOW ON THIS SHEET ARE FOR LANDING CROSSWALK ILLUSTRATION ONLY. FOR SPECIFIC PLACEMENT ORIENTATIONS AND DIMENSIONS REFER TO SHEET 4 OF 4. SEE NOTE 10. SNOW STORAGE 5. THE CROSS SLOPE OF RAMPS AND/OR LANDINGS AT MID BLOCK _VT_ P� CROSSINGS MAY BE WARPED TO MEET STREET OR HIGHWAY GRADE. CURB RAMP L CURB 4-11 6. USE TYPE B ONLY WHERE OTHER RAMPS ARE UNUSABLE. SINGLE RAMP 1 DIAGONAL OR DEPRESSED CORNER CURB RAMPS SERVING 4` TWO STREET CROSSING DIRECTIONS SHOULD BE AVOIDED IN NEW CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD ONLY BE CONSIDERED WHERE O CONDITIONS REWIRE THEIR USE �► 7. GRATES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON CURB RAMPS, BLENDED LANDING TRANSITIONS OR LANDINGS. ACCESS COVERS OF SIMILAR SURFACES SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE SURFACE REQUIREMENTS, 8. UTILITIES, SIGNS, AND OTHER FIXED OBJECTS MAY NOT BE PLACED SIDEWALK ON A CURB, OR IN A MANNER THAT INTERFERES WITH THE USE OF THE CURB RAMP. 9. THE SURFACE OF ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL BE STABLE, FIRM AND SLIP RESISTANT. A COARSE BROOM FINISH RUNNING SIDEWALK PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE IS RECOMMENDED ON CONCRETE CURB RAMP CONFIGURATION: TYPE 10 CURB RAMP CONFIGURATION: TYPE 12 w w RAMP SURFACES, EXCLUSIVE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING FIELDS. MID BLOCK CROSSING RIGHT TURN ISLAND CUT THROUGH o 10. THERE SHALL BE A LANDING AT THE TOP OF EACH PERPENDICULAR CURB RAMP AND A LANCING AT THE BOTTOM OF RAMPS TYPE 1 & 2 0 o ON SHEET 2 OF 4. 11. LANDINGS MAY OVERLAP WITH ADJACENT LANDINGS OR A SINGLE LANDING LANDING MAY SERVE MULTIPLE CURB RAMPS. 12. LANDINGS MAY OVERLAP WITH THE CLEAR GROUND SPACE REQUIRED AT PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL PUSH BUTTONS. LANDING CONCRETE O CONCRETE RAMP CURB RAMP CURB RAMP CONFIGURATION: TYPE 13 ACCESS ISLAND CURB RAMP CURB (OPTIONAL) a 0 SIDEWALK LANDING O CROSSWALK o LANDING CROSSWALK CURB RAMP I_ REVISED I I — 16-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 LANDING CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 406G Su NYeiH Highway INSPECTOR COPY type aSIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAILS wg a D—(1� STOREKEEPER COPY SUEWALK Notes: Fld. Sketch By: Date: Drawn 6y:CM1JDN Dote:9/3109 TOWn:EA.ST MARION —All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: 5cole:AS NOTED Sheet 48 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD CURB RAMP CONFIGURATION: TYPE 9 CURB RAMP CONFIGURATION: TYPE 11 N.Y.S. specs. Contactor: Mop No:23T Serv.Order No: [ of SeNces: fire OistEAST MARION MID BLOCK CROSSING —Misc. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project may be required Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: SIDEWALK LANDING LANDING CIOB RAW LANDING LANDING CLIRS RAW C CROSSWALK 4 9 3 - URB RAW SIDE FLARE DEFER TO —� MEET I OFA, NOTE 91 CIOB RAID LANDING EET 1 D ! LANDING - LANDING SIDEWALK LANDING LANDING SIDEWALK CROSSWALK Cure RAMP COWIMTIONI TYPE B REFER TO SHEET 3 OF 4 WROTE D NOT RECOMMENDED CROSSWALK CROSSWALK CROSSWALK �3y C I' SIDEWALK CURB RAID CONFIGURATION: TYPE 2 CURB RAMP COtFIGINATIOW TYPE 4 Cure RAMP CONFIGLIRATIO16 TYPE 6 BI1119= OR OTHER STRUCTURE CROSSWALK LANODI6 SIDEWALK y� SIDEWALK 3 LANDING LANDING SIDE FLARE DEFER TO SHEET 1 OF 4. NOTE 91 SHOW STORAGE LANDING CIKD RAMP gIIB RAW III LANDING LANDING SIDEWALK CROSSWALK LANDING LANONMG SIDEWALK CURB RAWffff CROSSWALK CIOB RAW SHOW STORAGE 9N0t STORAGE CURB RAMP CONFIGUTATIdM TYPE 7 DETECTABLE WARNING - OFFER TO SHEET 1 FIELD(ITPJ OF N,NONE IO CROSSWALK CROSSWALK CROSSWALK REVISED I I - 16-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise 769 y INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 1 1769 olec CUre RAMP CONFIGIR 110% TYPE I CURB RAMP COIFIGUMT1016 TYPE 3 STOREKEEPER COPY type r SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAILS wg. o.: p D-(1 Notes: FId. Sketch By: Date: Orown By:CMIJON Date:913109 Town:EA5T MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Sca/e:AS NOTED Sheet49 0/64 Township:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Mop No:23T Serv.Order No: / o/ Sevices: Eire Dist EAST MARION -Misc. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may be required C.rno. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project AX EXISTING CONCRETE 5• MMA -._-.-. PAVEMENT TOI-05 CONCRETE GROUTING l CAST IN I`-Y � M r 9• TAX. MATERIAL OR TOI-0T I�= MAX A 9•_ T• �i ANCHORING MATERIALS ;PEACE CURB- -+-�_ r �rbauDs _ r r Ir HYA ON PCC ROADWAY NW OR PCC- ARIA OR PCC 2• ° ° 1/= /ROLE �_� fN1A OR PCC HAS- - 4 CHAMFER o � I n PANES SE� _j PAVE S - t ���. -"o� R_Ilh._. -R=1 y! OPTIONAL PAVEMENT ON NO r SROIADER1 SMAILIERI • 6. < ? tv 6• ' .. 6' �,� - 6• . BACK MAY BACK MAY ° > a e m •'. , n - i' •� a 'e A• S• BE SLOPED BE SLOPED —"- - ° _. - _Y. H THICKNESS - AWAY FROM VERTICAL VERTICAL AWAY FROM L ,SADBASE GEE RAN • , I SLRBASE bEE RAN SUBBASE GEE PLAY ° S1081t% GEE RAM• s OF PATIENT FACE FACE 9� FACE FACE TYPICAL SE---___ ._,i ` TYPICAL SEC II A_. _ a i , . 4 ._TYPICAL $Ef TI01G ._. A ._ -_ TY_PICK SKCTRIO_n__. .. RESISTANT MIST TR46 RAW Oil 60 =l6 d TYPE VF150 TYPE N150 TYPE Yf00 TYPE T100 CURB ANCHOR BOTTOM wr BE sLBPEv...: (VERTICAL FACED an�CURB ANCHOR) 01DlYTABLE CURB 5)CIAB AIIOMN (MONTABLE COO WITHOPF CUM ANON (TRAVERSABLE CUOI IEW CIN BY EXISTING PAVEMENT) PCC 9• MAX yy � r Y� PAVEMENT ; CAST IN DERTICAL FACED( CRD (MOUNTABLE 1aM 1 T�WAR05 r 2• a 22' ° t . ° PRECAST CONCRETE CURB ROADWAY KC • �n 11 UK Ir PAVEMEPCCNT� {- I PAY PAVEIEIIT PAVEMENT ' -- PLACE COB PNT R=lyj• •.Y.. Y a - HMA OR KC 1 6• • Soo c_.. fil' 6• ♦ s_>? r A _ 1' yt EPAVEMENT OR _ _ _ v v n 1J• a Jlo vAc ° ' .La -.•I n e.. °• ;1' e• -n ° . }°v SIBBASE GEE AN' v —_ ' ''t Sl�AS�GEE PLAW -'' •o _al ° .a S169ASE GEE PLAN -CORROSION RESISTANT s n . a n L (, TYPICAL SECTIOO'...-..:. f __TYPICAL SECTIOIq_ __ s's6 -TYPICAL SECTIOO_ e HALF THICKNESS EPDXY COATING e - , � - - _ --I OF PATIENT EXCEPT THREADS) a > TYPE VF 15OA TYPE M 1SOA TYPE N IOOA CURB ANCHOR (VERTICAL FACED CUB NUN CAB ANCHOR( - MIX& FACED CIWB WITH CUB ANCIM GRANTABLE CURB WITH CURB ANCHOR) OEW CONSTAIICTIOB 6• GEE CRAB ANCHOR DETAILS) - GEE CUB ANCHOR DETALS1 GEE CUB ANCHOR DETAILS) (SEE NOTE 21 ,, - y GEE NOTE A) (SEE NOTE 51 ° ° --r— CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB s(MME GEE ao - • ° TYPICAL n_ a r TYPE PT 100 (TRAVERSABLE CURB( PRECAST CONCRETE CIM ANCHOR REOIDIED 31• MDL - 3F MAX. MA /�� 31• MIN, - 33• YAK �I OR PCC SIHHOR TAILS)R GEE WITH Pee PAVEMENT �7' YBL TbW� CRAB ANCHOR(9 j _2. CIgB II an_._ C i CURB ANCHOR DETAILS) ` �' PAYEIENT OR BACXFLLL y I• TAX. f .BKRF, CO EACH SIDE IN JOINT. ROAARDS HMA OR PCC - 6• YDN. --.- - ...-_._...777. COT1NRIb CONCRETE i CONCRETE BACKING AT EACH PAVEMENT OR Z. ' HIM rot PCC-*6" N, BACXIN6 TO TOP UR PAVEMENTJOINT.PLACE A MDL OF 12• SHCLOEIO - SHOaOfRJY . WLEXBLO PHOT MIX A AURVEIENF ALT CONCRETE RIOMil 'n R Iv' ' ". PAVEIEIPT OR SNOLOERSlBBASE bEE PLANTYPICAL SECITOIQ e , I SUBBASE M E A.__ _ n_- TYPIGL ,IT PE YFI50G TYPE YIOOG _SECTI010 ° e s A,1 GROUT T05-21 OR 701-04 , W7ICAL FACED CuB AND GUTIEIU WRITABLE CUB AND &UTTER CAB O1 on 6• WIN, CUB ON 60 / r Nil GEE 1 W91 GEE 1 609) CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PRECAST CONCRETE, STONE, AND GRANITE PRECAST CONCRETE, STONE, AND GRANITE C1MB WITH FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CIHB WITH RIGID PAVEMENT BEDDING AND BACCFILL BEDDING AND BACKFILL NOT MIX ASPHALT CUD -NOT MIX ASPHALT CUD NOTEA 3. CUD TYPES WI5K VF150A AND MIOOA REWIRE CUD ANCHOR. CN AND CUTTER TYPES VF15M OF AND YIOG REOE ANCHORS WHEN PLACED ADJACENT TO CONCRETE PAVEMENT 01 SHOLLOERAPPLY COAT OF APPLY 1. USE CIM AND CID AND &UTTER MEETING THE WTERLa AND COSTRUCUOM REQUIREMENTS OF�YT® PSE ASPHALT R-r __-R=2. rR�, SECTION 609 OFTHE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. /. WHEN VERTICAL FACED MRS LESS THAN 9' WIDE IS USED WITH C BOSS CUI, CU2, AND dD AND r __-. •' 5 RACED ADJACENT 2. CURB ANCHOR (NEW CO STRICTIONOL THIS DETAIL SHOWS PLACEMENT OFCRB ANCHORS. PUSH-DI CUM COMCRETTAa�FORXCtM BOX JODRS TO THIS Cl/D.SEE STANDARD SHEET MISCELLANEOUS AREA =402 SON• AREA = 34.4 SQA TYPE ANCHORS WAY BE USED GHOWII ON THE STANDARD SHEET FOR LONGITUDINAL TIER Te VOLAF =0279 C.F. +j6 : L VOLAF =0239 C.F. • --. 1 S. AGE WITH CUB BOXES,CYI.CM2. AND CY3. - CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway B• VARIES B• VARIES INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 Ype ro ec w o.: /'PANT W7ERUL,.. ?-PAV'T MATERIAL STOREKEEPER COPY CO1wC CURB & GUTTER ASHPHALT CURB g, D-(18) Notes Fla. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:CMIJON Date:913I09 Town:EAST MARION -AIR restoration on N.Y.S. VERTICAL FACED TYPE MOIMTABLE TYPE REVISED I I - 16-2009 R.O.W. to be done to Feld Prep By: rasp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet50 of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD ' REVISED 9-3-2009 N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No:23T Serv.Order No: j of Sevices: Fre Dish EAST MARION HOT MIX ASPHALT CURB -Mist. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: --- may be required 1 Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: •t."_.M�,r .- SAW CUT EXISTING ASPHALT S _:S p CPi'� ;_yam .i OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS ITIT PRvr"` SAR CUT EXISTING ASPHALT / Ae}� OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS tVV R C `Cy c ��'1® LAYOUT PONY �► TYPE 3 DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TYPE I DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE ? \ YP�o t TAPER METHOD WITH SIDEWALK AWAY FROM CIA! OR NO SIDEI TYPICAL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TYPE 'iA ' C'\ `, NOTE SEE RADIUS METHOD OF LAYOUT NOTES ON STANDARD 1 1 ` P�-' n" f� iz \ SHENOTET SEE TAPER METHOD N LAYOUT NOTES ON STAN SHEET TITLED "DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE LAYOUT" ���� \ SHEET TITLED "DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE LAYOUT' , 17p{p SEC aP +r \ a y irT y TM�NNEET NOT 1 1 1^ n 9 •v� C V/` mAiGlCONCREna elm , uraur _ �• ', ECTAB DETAILS''MISCELLANEOUS 1 � 1f Ay,E �pT '- \ CORNER ANGLE D �A'y� _.._.DRIVEWAY OPENING LOOT \ ER ANG STANDARD SHEET 1 '1• i 7 1 11 "`�q DRIVEWAY OPENING 1 � a r UNIT (TYPJ ..-\ 774 HIGHWAY EDGE OF PAVEIENT (¢ SHOULDER WNTH OPTIONAL 1' CIKOJ (SEE THIS SHEET NOTE 2) REVEAL GEE NOTE KI! DIRECTION OF TRAVEL E_cYIV r7HE{q 11` DRIVEWAY OPflD6 GEE NOTE O E OUTSIDE EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE NtiIr Ems' [/ _,"sV ,�i _ zX 44t -SAW CUT EXISTING ASPHALT OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS j..00RRWCCUT CONCRETE D� ASPHALT •T(:('� �� t�f q y ±Q� �'�Ar ,� -LAYOUT POINT �E z �p4Y/rr ' '-` bEF'�� Et},�, �''"'TF��� "�illk P •1$t 2 JT�' .A,�._ �4Pj�br E Gr �5VA y �rE SIDEWALK RAID LAYOUT VARIES -\ „ y \ rMS\�� zr (TYPJ \ COPoEN_AMO.E p���y y ? fr) LAYO T POINT �'f• .N,t COMOEN ANGLE p y y r VL F' 5 i SFr'' yVY y ► ♦ : p6� MNX/- % TYPE�2 DR[�WRADAE�MICE _�.{{ ,,cNWOO,, TYPE 4 DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE VNdrJ�' NOTE SEE RADIUS METHOD OF LAYOUT NOTES ON STANDARD SHEET QV•E�7" "'- V TAPER MET= WITH SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO an rA TITLED"DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE LAYOIP ((r _�9 tN5'gtNb RypX ' NOTE SEE TAPER METHOD OF LAYOUT NOTES ON STANDARD r ROTE THE LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES OF THIS DETAIL ILLUSTRATE .A ADd tE w({S� V.OE SHEET TITLED"DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE LAYOUT" yF'A�r > DIFFERENT DRIYEWAY/SIDEWA.K INTERFACES NVC?A' oeno �,�' NOTES, 065 1dN', R Y44`F"�O�•t►r W,P t. ATTO M TOM "T xaa am¢uEs•ra avutt wrEt Tarts IVUnam er YptE L P AOFaMDEE LYf OOnM6 TT,,2WOOOnn PAID FIN AREA D EADm Da X WT ff DFSMiN ED AS A ). TIN GETIES SMa TIE PIEOENT UMGTM rR"J EMPOING TO THE NOM MDI PAM LOOT r % TNKVM TIME'R'CAPE ESIEIW RYOW M PIR•T AS S iMFU EI TIE aMWAY THEE ON ME OWMACT DOMMM TABLE , A A DIDIEEAI T SECTWI HaIAD EMOD TO A LOOM MUM E VAh SOEDAIA EDGE.W TIE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TYPE SELECTION T�Y a MAIMOSTON rm M EORRGEUM OP POIEiY rtFOR ro EE M L hi FORD TIE TFO SECTNN E MOT PMT O TIE AAIIERY OEKNO OaMS 11MA TD Mrsm STMDNW SLEET MUM 'IEfIILIIEOIIS OIW RTAEY Ea M On TRANSUMIL COID(fIOG FOR USE S TIE TIRE OKT WARES TO IE OOM IIW NICK COGEMAL DNAEEAYS.TO OTHER ORMEAT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE atssswTKW DGIDERCTE.TnD EMTRIRR.ETU,RFEED TO M MR•POLPR Ia STAIDNaS ENTRANCE METHOD DRIVEWAY TRAVEL SH IAIE TO THE OE o Es N¢NEUR TD sTArz xalGLrr WNW. TYPE IETII00 CLASSIFICATION COMBER AND SNOLOER CRAB SIDEWALK HIGHWAY DOTE 5U AOLE MTN �� �COIWEIIOED� [ �UUM IT CM REEELD WOM TTwT TOE�Dm�ETAT& d Gmx�N L 6AR��AT�E THE 1111911gM THAT M TIE Oli a A REOANI BASIL AECOBEIDED FOR ALL REVISED I I - I 6-2009 RESIDENTIAL MGM USE ONLY USE nYN OR WITHOUT LOCATIONS EXCEPT FOR T. WTo°ES'VOTIET�OYPIIEW TTctM Df1C TER 6OO�p6 TT�i M1�OYSpSTYEE KM TYPE 1 RADRIS COMMERCIAL 12� WITH DAB SIOEWKK ' SPEED MOOR H CURB):IJAL REVISED 9-3-2009 Da NOR$A TIIWWI P LRAM a STAOHN,sWEr TYT •DRMWr DESWI EADET.DEr. WITH gKroT MOOR GO' aECDMOR MOED IDLY CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk Count Water Authorit 4060 Sunrise Highway USE ONLY USE WITH OR THTMaIT FOR MANOR �j 9 Y ANY SOFA INSPECTORKIM an COPY J TYPE 2 WADING OILY 1lOKIK 20, ' THTM DNB SIDEWALK Oakdale, NY 11769 USE ONLY WITH SIDEWALK STOREKEEPER COPY ype rolec wg. o.: ImaR eDM RE' RITE ONLY OFFSET A IIDL Or 2'FROM ONLY LOW ALTERNATIVE(TYPICALLY ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DETAILS D-(l gj TYPE 7 TAPER COYRLYUL TO OR(NOTE NO CRAB THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR SPEED (AS MPH TYPE (TTPICALLT FOR Notes Fla. Sketch GILT 1000 QOIE O DOTE D WITHOUT SIDEWALK OR LESS) URBAN AREA RAF) -AIR restoration on N.Y.S. By. Dote: Drawn By:CM�JDN Date:9/3/09 TowreEAST MARION 16' USE ONLY USE ONLY THIN SIDEWALK R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 51 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD LESS THAN 2' FROM OR ONLY LOW ALTERNATIVE ENTRANCE N.Y.S. specs. TYPE 1 TAPER OR II�RORoL ITO OR WRITE 6) WITH CURB SPEED N5 IRI Contractor: Map No:23T SemOrder No: of Sevlces: Fire Dist EAST MARION COIAERCGL t(IOM TOTE W OO7F lI ADJACENT TO THE EDGE OF OR LESS) TYPE (TYPICALLY FOR p ;/ PAVEMENT URBAN AREA LW -Mist. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may be required / Compl. Dwq. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hytlt Project: PREFABRICATED COMPOSITE STRUCTURAL ODUN PREFABRICATED COMPOSITE ITEM 207.15 STRUCTURAL ORMN ______________ SEE NOTES 15 At IT) ITEM 2OI.IS pp0p0 MNOTPROPOSED S ,R SIBGRADE OF ROADWAY I ON 3 OR _ — L FLATTER NTYPJ a '. . , ______________iI 0 NTYPJ .: ; .<>. ''•:i: •�// EXSTING 6ROUB / MATERIALS ON BOTH SIDES OF THEVERTICAL PANT LINE EL 'i/ PLACED AT THEE SAME T6E./LL BE /-2 ++ ++++ IS PAYMENT LIMITS FOR UNCLASSIFIED �. Y +++ / /++ + % EXCAVATION (HIGHWAY ESTIMATE) i.�i �� // �+ + / MATERIALS pl BOTH SIDES OF THE F�+'* EL... ! - A + +a / VERTICAL PAYMENT LINE SHALL BE / '+I �0 ITPJ � - _ ,' — -' i 0 fTYPJ 1 +�+ :ja. PLACED AT THE SAME TIME. - - 1.5 GEOTEXTILE BEOONG 0 (TYPJ--.- , �TEXIIIA DE DIG Fes- 0 ITEM 207.10 i i 207.10 SEE DETAIL •A• _ --- "`-' SECTION C-C L---- MIT TO SCALE - - SECTION D-D NOT TO SCALE DESIGNER WKS ----5 ; THE DETAILS ON THIS DRANK ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE RNWDSES ONLY i _ AND DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL PROJECT COMIITIONL o ,� ( i. i PORTIONS OUNIG H SOLELY INTENDED AS AM EXAMPLE AND SIB THOSE l- '-BACR OF STEM AREC OF THE S ACTUAL (RE NECESSARY TO SNOB THE DESD TE MINE .L. . 0 ITPJ PROPMED ABUt ENT ARE SEC ON AN ACTIBE TAKEN.T. THE DESIGNER SHALL OEIERYBE e�� IIEAE SECTIONS MAST BE TAKEN. � r --SHEETING AND LAGGING SHOWN AS AN EXAMPLE,SEE THE PREFABRICATED COMPOSITE FAR.F STRUCTURAL DRAM iAJt FOR ACTUAL TALL RECOREIOATATIONS. _..._ _ _ ITEM 207.15 PRIOR TO BACKFTLLING STAGE L INSTALL NEWLY BIB.T ABUTMENT- (SEE NOTES IS A IT)/j APPROPRIATELY SIZED TIMBER LAGGING THE AENKRIED LENGTH OF THE INTERIM SHEETING PR FOR STAGE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL "A° STAGE I CONSTRUCTION / OR STEEL SHEETM , AN OE I ON I BY THE INTERSECTION OF THE PROPOSED GROOO OFFSET MBA 1 ON 15 BOTTOM O FOOTI TMC FROM A PARALLEL LINE OPFSET NOT TO SCALE 7'-0' FROM THE BOTTOM OF FpITB6 FOR A001TId1AL NOTES AND LEGEND.SEE BD•EEiE. FOR SIRIETUE EXCAVATION OUDELIEL SEE NOTE IS ON BD-EEIE. INTERIM MTN CUT MB REMOVE EDARESHEETING M - EXISTING GROAT ,` �' ' THE CROSS WATCHED AREA PRIOR- SEE LAGGING DETAIL - }� TO STAGE I CONSTRUCTION _-PROPOSED ROADWAY SIX6ACE � T TO BE MILT OKIDIC� ATIa DE `� r OF ROADWAY STAGE 11 CONSTRUCTION , .r ______________U PROPOSED ABUTMENT /' EL.—..__ ,• 1 i r ATTACH LAGGING TO EXISTING AGGLmTO BE mX A BOLTED = —INDICATE SECTION MawLUS LAGGING DETAIL ANGLE TO BE DESIGNED. r i r h < , i < NOT TO SCALE INSTALL APPROPRIATELY NOTU SIZED TIMBER LAGGING r i < � 15 IF CONTRACTOR ELECTS NOT TO LAY i i Y < SLOPE BACK AND HOT USE MTERM PRarosEO FINISHED GRADE + ----- ( < ` SHEETING T AS DETAILED,SYSTEM MUST EXCAVATION SIsPOR DESIGNED REVISED I I - 16-2009 FOR ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION LOADING' REVISED 9-3-2009 EXISTING ABUTMENT EXCAVATION LIMIT-- CONTRACTOR COPY INDICATE YD1.EYBFDIFM 4060 SunriseHighway g y _ Suffolk County Water Authority Oakdale, NY 11769 INSPECTOR COPY ______ L IV� CONTRACTOR EXCAVATE NO B MAY THE ype Pro ec g. EXCAVATE �� T LINE. STOREKEEPER COPY w o.. EXG�AVATION& EMBANKMENT DETAILS D-(20 L-------a Notes. FId. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:CMIJDN Date:9/3109 Town:EAST MARION -AIR restoration on N.Y.S. ELEVATION H-H R.O.W. to be done to Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheef52 Of64 Townshlp:SOUTHOLD INTERIM SHEETING DETAIL N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Ma No:23T Serv.order No: p j of Semes: Fre Dish EAST MARION NOT TO SCALE -Mist. bends ir offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main' may be required Project. Comp). Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: � �,-SEE NOTE 20 RYPJ � PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE fTYPJ / _ c PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE ITTPJ / t (TYPIL , 0 QTPJ A i � ( ,J•�. N / � ..1}� I ` /'. `eif I / A \ • \♦ M fi}: �v � l C}�y�' i b :C I O (TYPJ- �r� .+a C1 r .'. PROPOSED FOOTINGVfi/� �i/ \ + ,. BOTH SIDES + \\ i E , 2!}.U'�:,1J.. •.a `+f�a }i' ATTACH LAGGBIG TO COIPLE f.• +' fa} —STAGE CONSTRUCTION JOINT(TYPJ Cib?ej STAGE I C OSTR IXTIO PRIOR TO .,•, i,f _- / C3 + 1 _ ( •'\ - \ STAGE u CONSTgCna(TYP. Ct , . ,. , . •v A FTH SIDES) Cl '' ' ! / -STAGE �IgVK JOINT fTYPJ sa-0' IER. cy OR ^,` \ OF OROS. ; �•" I / r � ; \ �� TTWIG& BOTN SIDES) FLATTER �0 IT?J�- ' -►r+r+ Y-W ITYPJ I / `w— "t= ' it 3'-0' (TTPJ f rF•L+ .�'i• C'��_ON D-EE16G DETAIL, EMBANKMENT AT SIl9tA0E RTP.)-� J �� 1 ON O OR....°......... tY, G e- .. + } /i ii J' H I•�0(fTPJ ail+ a" H, t tI ROADNAT Rom. FLATTER .. SEE DESIGNER NOTE RTPJ-� i - f C2 CUT OFF OR REMOVE a :;J ,':g � 'S' J• ST PREFABRICATED W M17E C2'I I TO STAAGE TING ll ON TR. (M.) /,1 PRIOR1 I ON 2 C+ '� . C4 »"PREFABRICATED COMPOSITE \\ STRUCTIRK DRAIN OTEY 207.15) �' , 1y n ✓ STRIICTIRAL DRAM OTEN 207.151 / SEE NOTE 15 A 171 4 +'f 0 ITYPJ-��y; j ,+, , ! CUFF NOTE 15 R 11, ff / + EYBAMNYENT Al SUBGRADE RTPJ- �'` •v +< * / / �.f •• A a .- 3-0' (T1R- . <� �+ �' / •/ir r / 4/�/ PROPOSED FOOTING_.. + o r<'�•. PLAN NOT TO SCALE REVISED I I - I G-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ype ro ec STOREKEEPER COPY EXCAVATION&EMBANKMENT DETAILS D-(21) Notes. Fla. Sketch By: Date: Drawn 6y:CMIJDN Date:9/3/09 Town:EAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet53 Of64 Tawnship:SOUTHOLO N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map Na:23T Serv.Order No: / of Sevices: Fire Oist EAST MAR10N -Mist. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Proj ect:may be required CompL 0.9. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: LEGEND DESIGNER NOTES /i i/ EXA7ms cnaf0 SURFACE 1.COMIYATE ROM THE OFFICE OF STRUCTURES FOWDATIO S AID CONSTRUCTION UNITY FOR THE SETBACK 03TAMM ���- LEINEROC[ OF THE FOOTING FROM THE FIRM. ROCK ROE, THE DEPTH OF THE FOOTOD EIDEDIENT INTO SOLM ROCK OF ? NECESSARYL AD/0111 THE NECESSITY OF DOWELING OR KEYOD THE FOOTING INTO THE ROCK SURFACE. SELECT STRUCTURE fALl OTEY 20321L COMPACTED i0 952 OF STAIDAID PROCTOR 2. dNSOUND ROCK, THE STRUCTURE EXCAVATION PAYMENT LIES SMALL SHOW FOOTINGS BEING PORED AUNT ROOK F-17,721DENSITYMMAXIMUM DENSE 7. L AREAS EWHEREMAT RIA BELOW THE REMOVAL F A AEnS REP INDICATE 01 H THE PLANS THE ESTIMATED FDQ a •::',; (},,Tr,• :;. HIGHWAY EMBANKMENT MATERIAL RIOOAY ESTIMATE IRSIBTABEE MATERIAL BELOW TEE BOTTOM a FOOTING A5 REPORTED d THE FOUNDATION BESIOI REPORT FDD. AM RACE THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL NOTE ON THE FLANS'UNSWAILE MATERIAL SMALL BE REMOVED TO THE � BACKFIL WIT" SUITABLE EXCAVATED MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER STDCTUE DEPINS NASD ON THE PLANS. NO PATIENT WILL BE WOE FOR REMOVAL BELOW THESE DEPTHS ULESS AUTHORED EXCAVATION UTEM 2OU14 ON TRENCH 8 CULVERT EXCAVATION GTEM 206021 � IN MTN BY THE ENGINEER AFTER COISULTATION WITH THE REGIONAL BEOTEOWJL ENGINEER'. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFRLED IT" SELECT STRUCTURE FILL OTEM 207211 U ELM OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. A.ROPE PROTECTION TREATMENT SMALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER. HIGHWAY EMBANKMENT MATERIAL N• TOPSIZEA COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY RIMAY ESTIMATE S.AT SOME SITES, L A TO BE PLACED TO TIES HE PILE OF ARE AND ALLOWED TO STANK d ORDERSHOULD To BE �\� 7,7\ HIGHWAY EIBORIENT MATERIAL, COMPACTED TO 95X OF STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM USED SDATE THE THE APPLICABLE MATERIAL MM THE PULES ABE DRIVEN. d THIS GAS, A DETAIL SNOLLO BE USED ES ARY TO /BE APPLCAnE CASE SNORT ON BO EE9E. A 5'-0` PAID OF SELECT STRUCTURE FILL A DENSITY(HIGHWAY ESTIMATE '. UNNECESSARY FOR PALE FOUNDATIONS. L SEE 81106E MANUAL SECTION 4 FOR GUIDELINES ON SXEETDI AND COFFERDAMS, frW MIT N 71 SELECT MAW"FILL. SLOE PROTECTION - TYPE A OTEM 203D801) 7. SEE GROW MANUAL. SECTION 1 FOR GUIDELINES ON SELECTING THE PROPER TRENCH L CULVERT i EXCAVATION ITEM. ® STORE FALLING GURU 01EM 610DID I STONE FOALING WAVY)O7EM 620.05D 1 l IN FALL SITUATIONS. THE REGIONAL GE07EDW-K ENGINEER SMALL DETERMINE THE DEPTH THAT THE SURFACE SOILS . SHALL WE STR BENEATH ADIBEMT AND FIER FOOTINGS WHICH ARE 10 ft.OR LESS ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE IT"d A RECTANGULAR OR TRAPEZODNAL AREA BONDED BY LINES 15 ft. OUTSIDE THE ABIRIENT /� REMOVAL OF SIRS1fiICTUES RTEY 2oL191 ESfiYV�� FOOTING OR TO THE TOE OF SLOPE. ROCHEVEA IS LESS. QUANTITY To BE INCLUDED IN HIGHWAY 9.FOR STREAM BANK PROTECTION NOTES,SEE BD-EESE. o` c 7 SPECIAL BACKFILL FOR M.S.E.S OC IN LIDED MS.E.S ITEM 55AAi1 IM THE LOCATION OF PAYMENT LIES FOR SELECT STRUCTURE FILL aTEM 20321)AND EXCAVATION AROUND ABITIIEIIA,PEWS AND WALLS SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE FO.LOWIMG PBEFAONCA7E0 COMPOSITE STRUCTURAL OIAd ITEM 207.IA '. L d ROCK.NITS 2 SHALL GOVENI, L IN SOB..THESE LIES SMALL BE SET BACK A DISTANCE OF THE FOOTING PROJECTION PLUS Y-Ow.OR AS SINTER ENCLOSED WITHIN THESE INS DESIGNATES PATIENT TOES FOR STRUCTURE DETERMINED IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN REPORT FONL — — — EXCAVATION (ITEM 2OL011 11.FOR SPECIAL DETAILS FOR INTEGRAL ABUTMENTS.SEE THE WIDE SBEE75. DESIGNATES PAYMENT LINES FOR PERMANENT TIMBER SHEETING GTEW 552.101E 12. F SHEETING 15 USE%REFER TO SECTION A OF THE BRIDGE MANIAL FOR THE APPROPRIATE IFORMATHIN —P— OR PERMANENT STEEL SHEETING 1552.11) TO Ial� ON THE CORRAC7 BANS. E SOLDER PIES ARE USED,REFER TO THE MOMBES ACCOMPANYING I TEMPORARY TOM SHEETING (ITEM 552.12E O THE SOLDER PILE WALL SPECIFICATION FOR THE APPROPRIATE WMMTON TO INCLUDE ON THE CONTRACT RAMS. —T— ON DESIGNATES MATESATES TEMPORARY STEEL SHEETING PAYMENT TOES FOR L55L131 11 IF INTEDII SHEETING A USED. OCLIDE THE FOUL CUT-OFF ELEVATION FOR THE SHEETING.REFER TO THE FDA FOR THE APPROPRIATE CUT-OFF ELEVATION —I— DESIGNATES PAYMENT LIES FOR INTERIM TIRED SHEETING DIEM 552.10, OR INTERIM STEEL MTN (MIST 14.E THE INTERIM SHEETING A FOR STAGE CONSTRICTION,SHOW THE COBECTION BETWEEN THE INTERIM SHEETING AND THE EXATINWPROPOSFD ADNIENT. —EPS— DESIGNATES PAYMENT LOSS FOR EXCAVATION FR07ECTMN SYSTEM UTEM 552.161 15.IF WEEPROE A WITHIN 4'-0' OF THE TOP OF FOOTIML EXTEND THE PREFABRICATED COMISITE STRUCTURAL DRAW TO THE TO' OF FOOTING.OTHERWISE,STOP THE DRAIN 1'-0* BELOW THE WEEPHOE WENT ELEYATlOL C— DESIGNATES COFFERDAM(TYPE 11 (ITEM WMIrnWO.OR COFFERDAM TIYPE 2)GTEM 55302m" IL COFFERDAM LEGEND DESIGNATIONS SHOULD BE SERLkl= BY EACH SUBSTRUCTURE EXCAVATION MI.C2,C31 ETCA .�— AREA ENCLOSED WITHIN THESE LINES DESIGNATES PAYMENT LIMES FOR TRENCH L CULVERT 1T.APPROACH SLAB COMPOSITE STRUCTURAL L BRAIN PCS01 SNAIL BE PLACED TO 111E LEVEL OF THE BOTTOM a THE EXCAVATION - OD. (ITEM 20CML OR TRENCH A CULVERT EXCAVATION OTEM 20L021 APPROACH AAB ON ABUiIENT STEPS. 18. FOR STRUCTURE EXCAVATION OVER S'-0' DEEP USE A LAYBACL SLOE OF I VERTICAL TO 15 HORIZONTAL FROM THE BOTTOM OF EXCAYATIOL FOR MORE COMCE REFER TO SECTION 4 OF THE BRIGS MANUAL. NOTEi 19. THE LOCATION OF PATIENT IDES U E RIROADW EXCAVATION HORIZONTALATTHE LIMITS d FRONT a THE AAT STREAM T ALL ITEMS IN LEGEND ARE INCLUDED IN MUDGE ESTIMATE,EXCEPT AS NOTED. WILL IO AT THE TOE OF ROPE AT IWDEN ROADWAY LOCATIONS ON AT iBE EDGE OF THE STOW LETS AT STREAM LOCATId6. 20 TLRMM CONFIRM MAY BE REQUESTED BY THE RE"TO SATISFY PERU CO MMM FOR GUIDANCE AND DETAILS REFER TO Q 05-02L REVISED I I - 16-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Oakdale, NYe11 69 Highway INSPECTOR COPY ype EXC STOREKEEPER COPY AVATION&EMBANKMENT NOTES w9. D-(2� Notes: Fld. Sketch By. Date: Drawn By:CM/JDN Oate:9/3/09 Tawn:EAST MARION —All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet 54 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No:23T Serv.Order No: d of Sevices: Fire Dist EAST MARION —Misc. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may be required Compl. Dwq. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: NOTES. B. THE MINI"REPAIR LENGTH SHALL BE 1.8 METERS. THE MAXIMUM CURB TO BE REPLACED AS REPAIR LENGTH SHALL BE 3.6 METERS. ALL REPAIRS IN EXCESS NECESSARY,SEE WYE 10.(TYPJ SE m MIN. REPAIR LENGTH I. WITHIN ONE LIMITS OF EACH WORK ZONE AND A MINIMUM OF TWO WEEKS SEE NOTE B PRIOR CT R COMMENCEMENT GI FUND DEPTH S E STRESS THE OF 3.6 METERS SHALL BE DIVIDED INTO EQUAL IEN6TN5 THROWN THE CONTRACTOR WILL RELIEVE BY ONE OF COMPRESSIVEFOLLOWING STRESS IN THE USE OF TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT ASSEMBLIES PAID FOR UNDER SE m MIN. PAVEMENT SYSTEM A.O.B.E. BY ONE OF THE FOLLOMING AE 7N005U ITEM 502.91E THE MAXIMUM SPECIE OF THE TRANSVERSE EXPANSION CURB SEE NOTE B CATCH BASIN JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE 3.6 ENTEAN IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE FOUL DEPTHTHE REMOVAL OF F THE PAVEMENT FROM THE TRANSVERSE JOINTS LOGE OF THE PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT AND THE EXISTING TRANSVERSE ACROSS THE FULL OF N THE PAVEMENT SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE JOINT E LESS THAN l.0 METERS, THE PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SHALL IBE N RELEASE OF IOOmm OF LONGITUDINAL COMPRESSIVE STRAIN FOR EVERY EXTENDED TO A POINT 0.7 METERS PAST THE EXISTING TRANSVERSE JOINT. 360 in OF PAVEMENT. THE TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHALL MEET THE AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT PLANS, OR WHERE ORDERED BY REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION 705-15. -TRANSVERSE JOINT SUPPORTS', THE ENGINEER. A 100m WIDE FUEL DEPTH CUT SHALL BE MADE IN ONE WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS, COMPLETE UNINTERRUPTED OPERATION TRANSVERSELY ACROSS THE FULL THE TRANSVERSE EXPANSION ASSEMBLY JOINT FILLER SMALL BE A NUN- WIDTH OF THE PAVEMENT, CURB AND GUTTER. THE INTERVAL BETWEEN BITUMINOUS MATERIAL OTHERWISE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CUTS SHALL BE 360M 3 SON. SUBSECTION 705-07 AND 705-15. THE JOINT FILLER SHALL BE 10. 1N THICKNESS, THE MANUFACTURER OF THE JOINT ASSEMBLY SHALL FURNISH NO SEPARATE PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FOR THIS WORK AND THE COST SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE USE OF THE ENGINEER AND CONTRACTOR, Hv/ /,H SHALL INCLWED IN THE PRICE 810 FOR VARIOUS ITEMS. SHOWING THE METHOD OF SECURING THE JOINT ASSEMBLY TO THE SUBBASE. PAYMENT FOR THE JOINT FILLER. EXPANSION CAP AND EXPANSION UNTIED LONGITUDINAL JOINT 2. AFTER THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT IN THE REPAIR AREA. CAP FILLER MATERIAL IS INCLUDED UNDER ITEM 502.91 OR 502.3201--10. SEE NOTE II AND DETAIL C FOR PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAILS THE ENGINEER WILL INSPECT THE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO 9. FOR THE RIGHT AND LEFT LANES WITHOUT OUTSIDE ADJACENT PANELS OR ON OWC.PR-IB OYPJ UNTIED LONGITUDINAL AT CATCH BASINS AM MANHOLES DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL DETERIORATION OR DAMAGE EXISTS. CURB. THE DOWEL OFFSET FROM THE OUTSIDE UNSUPPORTED EDGES SHALL JOINT SEE DWG PR-IC 3. IF THERE IS E ADDITIONAL DETERIORATED OR DAMAGED PAVEMENT BE 150mm AND THE OFFSET FROM THE ADJACENT INTERIOR PANEL SHALL AFTER THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT AS DETERMINED BY BE 305. C.C. HOWEVER. THE SPACES BETWEEN DRILL SETUPS SHALL BE THE ENGINEER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY COMPLETE THE ADJUSTED TO PROVIDE FOR 12 DOWELS ON EACH FACE OF THE REPAIR. REPAIR WORK DURING THE WORK SHIFT. IF THE CONTRACTOR CANNOT FOR INTERIOR LANES WITH CONCRETE SLABS ON BOTH SIDES, OR OUTSIDE COMPLETE THE REPAIR WORN DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND HIS LANES WITH CURB AND INTERIOR LANES ON ONE SIDE, PLACE II DOWELS 0.3 m� CONTROL AND WITH THE FULL APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER DARING THE AT 305mm C.C. SPACING WITH THE ENO DOWELS 305. OFF THE ADJACENT MIN. WORK SHIFT HE MAY AT HIS OWN EXPENSE PLATE THE REPAIR AREA OR CONCRETE PANELS. USE A TEMPORARY WOOD PLATFORM FOR PAVEMENT REPAIR AS SHOWN IN THE PLANS H IT MAY AT HIS MEETING EXPENSE, PLACE ONE- HALF THE 10. THE HOLE DIAMETER FOR THE DOWEL BAR SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PAVEMENT DEPTH WITH MATERIAL MEEHE THE REQUIREMENTS U THE ANCHORING MATERIAL MANUFACTURES WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS. ITEM 301.10119917 AND ONE- HALF THE PAVEMENT DEPTH OF MATERIAL THE DOWEL BAR SHALL BE EPDXY COATED PER SUBSECTION TOS-15 MEETING THE REQUIREMENTSLTS. E EITHER BINDER COURSE OR TOP COHSE HET MIX ASPHALT ITEMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE EACH "COITAL" AND THEN SHOP COATED WITH AECTYL IO BOND BREAKER. REPAIR WITHIN 98 HOURS OF THE INITIAL PAVEMENT REMOVAL NOMINAL THICKNESS TO THE BREAKER SHALL BE EOCONCRET IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO O THE INCORPORATION OF THE CONCRETE THE 4. IF ADDITIONAL DETERIORATION OR DAMAGE EXISTS AS DETERMINED BY THE PROTRUDING PORTION OF THE DOWEL 8Ag5 SHALL BE LIGHTLY GREASED. ASPHALT SHOULDER ENGINEER THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE ORDERED TO SAWCUT AND REMOVE 11. ALL LONGITUDINAL JOINT TIES IN THE REPAIR AREA SHALL BE REMOVED MANHOLE ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT. THIS SEQUENCE WILL BE REPEATED AS NECESSARY PAYMENT IS INCLUDED UNDER ITEM 502d101--18). PRIOR TO THE TO REMOVE ALL DETERIORATED IN OR DAMAGEDCONCRETETREMOVAL PAVEMENT. THE PLACING OF THE REPAIR CONCRETE,PLACE A TOM THICK JOINT FILLER EXISi[NG iAAx5VEP5E JOINTS CONTRACTOR WILL BE PAID FOR ALL PAVEMENT EITHER UNDER THE AT THE LONGITUDINAL FACE O' THE LANE OR LANES CONTIGUOUS TO THE APPROPRIATE ITEMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EITHER D CONCRETE SAWCUT REPAIR. THE JOINT FILLER SHALL BE A NON-BITUEINOUS MATERIAL /-EXISTtW NGITUDINAL JOINTS PLAN VIEW AND REMOVE ANY ADDITIONAL DETERIORATED OR DAMAGED CONCRETE OR OTHERWISE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION 105-07 AND SHALL HE MAY WITH THE FULL APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. BE SUPPLIED E ONE UNBROKEN PIECE WHOSE DIMENSIONS ARE EQUAL H CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR PLATE THE REPAIR AREA OR USE A TEMPORARY WOOD PLATFORM FOR PAVEMENT THOSE OF THE EXISTING ADJACENT PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. FURTHERMORE. ASPHALT SHOULDER REPLACEMENT NOT i0 SCALE REPAIR AS SHOWN ON THE BANS OR HE MAY, AT HIS NG EXPENSE, PLACE THE JOINT FILLER SHALL BE 10 mm IN THICKNESS. THE MANUFACTURER SEE NOTE 19. (TYP.) NOIFA THIS LAME CONFIGURATION IS SHOWN PM PAVEMENT ONE-HALF THE PAVEMENT DEPTH WITH MATERIAL MEETING THE F MATERIAL OF THE JOINT FILLER SHALL FURNISH SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE USE OF LAYOUT INFORMATION ONLY. IT MAY NOT NECESSARILY OF ITEM 304.1011IRE AND ONE-HALF THE PAVEMENT DEPTH OF MATERIAL THE ENGINEER AND CONTRACTOR, SHOWING THE METHOD OF SECURING THE RELFECT THE CONFIGURATION IN THIS PROJECT. MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF EITHER BINDER COURSE UR iW COURSE HOT MIX ASPHALT ITEMS. THE JOINT FILLER TO THE SUBBASE. PAYMENT FOR THE LONGITUDINAL JOINT WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE INITIAL PAVEMENT REMOVAL.SHALL COMPLETE EACH REPAIR FILLER MATERIAL AL INSTALLATION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE INITIAL C BID FOR ITEM 502320I--1 O. 1.8 m MIN.REPAIR LENGTH SEE NOTE B 5 CONCRETEPAYMENT REPAIR BOUNDARIES A CUTTING ND ANYAADDITIOJASE L AND CUITSDTOµ) THE 12. USE EPDXY COATED WELDED WIRE FABRIC. MN39-150mm X 150M MEETING FACILITATE LIFT-OAT OR REMOVAL a ADDITIONAL DETERIORATED CONCRETE THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 709-08 OF THE NYS STANDARD EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT ITEM 502.1001--I8 6 ITEM 502.310I--IB AST.GONG. PAVEMENT IS INCLUDED UNDER ITEM 502.7101--18. SAW CUTTING AROUND SPECIFICATIONS. PAYMENT FOR THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC IS INCLWED TRANSVERSE EXPANSION PAVEMENT UNDER ITEM 502.6030--10. THE ASPHALT SHOULDER REPLACEMENT WILL BE MADE UNDER ITEM 520.09----10. JOINT SEE DETAIL A ON FOR PROPOSED RESRFACDNGG FOR NG PROPOSED RESURFACING 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT F OF REPAIR IALWHICH THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DWG.PR-IB TRANSVERSE EXPANSION SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS 6. AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER, INSTABLE MINIMUM S FOUND BENEATH THE REEVE ANY JOINT FILLER MATERIAL E. N CONCRETE ABOVE THE LEVEL JOINT SEE DETAIL A ON ITEM 407.0101 Jp5 mn ITYP_I. REMOVED PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 300 OF THE ADJACENT EXISITIE CONCRETE. NO CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED TACK COAT OIIG PA-IB MILLIMETERS UNDER ITEM S BUCK AND SHALL BE REPLACED MO ER ITEM UNLESS THE CONTOUR PROFILE OF THE JOINT FILLER MATERIAL MATCHES SEE NOTE 11 ITEM304.0001--IB 704.10119917. TOOTHLESS BUCKETS SHALL BE USED TO REMOVE THE TOP THAT OF THE EXISTING ADJACENT CONCRETE TO REMAIN. THE FIRST 3.7 225 MILLIMETERS. THE REMAINING 75 MILLIMETERS SHALL BE REMOVED WITH METERS OF REPAIR CONCRETE AGAINST EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE SEE NOTE i HAND TOOLS. ITEM 304.10119917 SHALL BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT IN SCREEOED PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. 75mm EXCESS OF 75 MILLIMETERS AND COMPACTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH .. N.Y.SJ).O.T. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 203-3.12 "COMPACTION". 14. A 100 MICRON THICK POLYETHYLENE SHEET, WHOSE DIMENSIONS ARE 75mm LESS THAN THOSE W THE REPAIR AREA ALL AROUND, SHALL BE SECURED TO 7. FINE GRADING OF EXISTING SUBBASE IS REWIRED ONLY WHEN NO UNSTABLE THE SUBBASE, A.O.B.E..PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF REPAIR CONCRETE. - MATERIAL IS FOUND BENEATH THE REMOVED PAVEMENT. - - - --- ------- 15. WHEN THE EXISTING GI DIVALENT IS NOT BELL RESURFACED ALL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL JOINTS AT LIMITS ID OR WITHIN THE PAVEMENT 502.70 00218PAIfl AREA SHALL BE SEALED. AND PAID F011 UNDER ITEM I SEE NOTE 6 •I••� 16. A MAXIMUM OF TWO DAYS BEFORE JOINT SEALING. UNDER ITEM 502.70100218, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT (SAWCUT PAYMENT IS [ELUDED UNDER ITEM 502.70100218) A RESERVOIR 40. DEEP BY 16mm WIDE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE FIVE 3mm BLADES STACKED. ITEM 502.3101--IB 17. WHEN THE EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS BEING RESURFACED OR IF THE REPAIR THICKNESS'T" TO MATCH EXISTING ITEM tO3A2 SEE NOTE 6 AREA IS IN EXISTING COMPOSITE PAVEMENT, ALL TRANSVERSE AL LONGITUDINAL JOINTS A7 LIMITS OF AL WITHIN THE PAVEMENT REPAIR AREA ITEM 102.6030--IO PREPARED BY, ALTERED BY, SHALL BE SEALED AND PAID FOR TINDER ITEM 402.2502--18. TACK COAT pY ON, ITEM 407.0101 SHALL BE APPLIED BETWEEN ALL HMA COURSES. KEl0E0 HIRE FABRIC SEE NOTE 1218. PAYMENT FOR CURB REMOVAL IS INCLUDED UNDER ITEM 502.310I--18. ITEM 304.I0119917 PAYMENT FOR CURB REPLACEMENT WILL BE MADE UNDER THE CURB ITEM. PROPOSED RESURl SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS 19. CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIRS ADJACENT TO EXISTING ASPHALT SHOULDERS WILL REQUIRE SHOULDER REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT. SEE DETAIL F ON LONGITUDINAL SECTION DRAWING PRAB. CALCIUM CHLORIDE ACCELERATED CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAIL REVISED O 1 -25-2010 NOT TO SCALE (TRITIUM 08/24/05 REVISED 10/15/07 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ype roiec wg. o.: STOREKEEPER COPY PR IA CONRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAILS D-(23) Notes: Flo. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:CM/JDN Date:01/25/10 TOwn:EAST MARION -All restoration On N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Scale:AS NOTED Sheet55 Of64 Township:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No:23T Senarder No: IT of Semes: Fire Dist EAST MARION -Mist. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may be required 1 Comp). Dw9. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: ITEM 502.60J0--1e ITEM 4ozlsoz--la ITEM soz.iol oozle x076 ITEM 502.J201--10 ,- ITEM 502.J20]--to PROPOSED EXISTING ASPHALT 1. SEE DRAWING PR-IA FOR NOTES FOR CALCIUM CHLORIDE ITEM 502.60]0--10 CONCRETE REPAIR SHOULDER ACCELERATED CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIRS. 0.6 m OR A.05E ' v,v � - ITEM 407.0101� EXISTING PCC, \ • v zs mm t/I ° x v P5 mm''1 (� v •v c�(STING PCC1 i/2 IN mm ITEM 402.090101 A. v, ,v ,d•. . MATCH ExISi. 1 2-50 mm LIFTS 1 -}{/- CRO55 SLOPE v. e . •O� a •p � a.•• pao 10mm JOINT FILLER •. e. Vz a IOmm JOINT FILLER v2 ° °• ' ° °• a a .. ap. W a a T ° v v •. ° ^t'J -ITEM 520.09----10 ITEM 203.02 "T" EXISTING OF `POLYESION CA (CLEAR OR TRAMSLUCExTI, [TEN J'1"_IO 9917 J EXISTING PCC 2J0 mm 230 mm EXPANSION CAP WITH IS mm%29 mm 230 mm 230 mm 1 THICKNESS UMISO mm, PAVEIENI CIA.JOINT FILLER[gIF0.9111NG WITH MINIMUM I50 mml SECTION 705-07,SEE NOTE B ON OWL.PR-IA DETAIL F ASPHALT SHOULDER REPLACEMENT EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS BEING RESURFACED DETAIL A EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS NOT BEING RESURFACED WHEN EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS NOT BEING RESURFACED (WHEN EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS BERM. RESURFACED TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR DETAILS) MAT EXISTING PAVEMENT/NEW PAVEMENT INTERFACE) Nor TO SCALE 1WJT to SCALE ITEM 502.1001--IB ITEM 502.1001-18 ITEM 102250Z--I8 ITEM 502.6OJ0--lo ITEM 502.i0100218 6 ITEM'In O1--IB EXISTING LONLITIAINAL JOINT 6 ITEM 502.J101--IB EXISTING LONGITUDINAL JOINT ITEM 502.60J0--10- 'i ITEM 502.W30--1O �IOmm JOINT FILLER ITEM 502.70100218 15mm ITEM 502.6030--10 -ITEM 4021502--1$ 5mm IOmm JOIHi-�• W v• •v •. > o a O p E FILLER ,°. . O i-ITEM 502.91 ITEM 502.9J ° .•v p p • ° ' p V v ••• % 25 mm T/2 25 mm+1 •° ° O•••p .a. •A. O I� v v v v i/2 PROPOSED RESURFACING v SEE TYPICAL SECTIONSXISTING OR < p /}.q ° v �PNOPOD PCC /1 p ° p -EXISTING PROPo D PCC d• ° vp A. iR p v v, ? •v WELDED WIRE FABRICS •�•• WELDED WIRE FABRICS 'A•• v 6 e N L T •v IIEu 502.6oJ0--10 v v 'e• v 'd' W IOmn JOINT FILLER 4 IQnm JOINT(FILLER Po IA 111 i N F a SEE NOTE I ON DILL. • ° ..-_-____ W .. < • . a SEE NOTE 11 ON OWL.PR-IA ° y < Y 230 mm 230 mm POLYEXPANSION CA [CLEAR OR WANSLUCEXTI E CIA.JOINT FILL- WITH 25mm%29 mm 210 mm 230 mm DIN.J01Nr NLEER D wlrx SECTION 105-01,SEE ROTEOTE 8 EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS NOT BEING RESURFACED EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS BEING RESURFACED 8 O ON DWG PR-IA EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS BEING RESURFACED EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT IS NOT BEING RESURFACED DETAIL C DETAIL B LONGITUDINAL JOINT TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT •T" , THICKNESS OF (AT EXISTING PAVEMENT/NEW PAVEMENT INTERFACE) (AT NEW PAVEMENT/NEW PAVEMENT INTERFACE) EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE X0i TO BCALE ITEM DESCRIPTION PANEL WIDTH I UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL 304.0001—]8 FINE GRADING OF EXISTING SUBBASE I50 304.10119917 SUBBASE COURSE, TYPE 1011-2 lM ^x^ FOR DDIIEL SPACING AND NUMBER OF DOWELS SEE ROLE 9 ON OWC.PR-IA mm 4p2.098101 95 mm FI SUPERPAVE AMA,80 SERIES LDWACTI011 402.09E 111 MANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO 402.098101 4022502--18 SAWING AM SEALING JOINTS IN NEW NOT MIX ASPHALT OVERLAYS USING HOT APPLIED SEALANT i 2 407.0101 TACK COAT T 502.tODI--I8 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE REPAIR EVALUATION AM MARK NT PREPARED BY, ALTERED BY, T{.2 + 502.3101--IB FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE LIFT-OUT Oth ON502d20t--10 DRILL AND ANCHOR pOUELS FOR CALCIUM CHLORID"MEPTH L DEPTH PCC PAVEMENT REPAIRSADJACENT TO SUPPORTED 29 mm DIA.OOWEL BAR ADJACENT i0 502.6030--10 CEMENT CONCRETE FOR PAVEMENT REPAIRS -FRICTEDGE (EXISTING CONCRETE SEE NOTE 10 ON DWG.PR-1A LNSL°PORTEO 502.20100218 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PORTLANG CEMENt PANEL OR CLAUD EDGE SLMHASPHALT SHOULDER) 502.91 CONSTRUCTING TRANSVERSE JOINTS TRANSVERSE SECTION 520.0----10 SAWCUTTINC ASPHALT CONCRETE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAIL 604AT21--10 RESETTING EXISTING DRAINAGE FRAMES ON EXISTINES REVISED O I -25-20 IO NOT TO SCALEORIGINAL 08/24/05 REVISED 10/15/07 - -- CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 STOREKEEPER COPY 1B C'ONRETE PAVEMENT=DETAMTAIL Wg a D-(ZAl Notes: FIG. Sketch By: Date: Drawnte:01125110 TON,n:EAST MARION -AIL restoration on N.Y.S.R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: Scale: et56 Of 64 Tawnship:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor- Map Nc:23T Serv.O / of Sevices: Fire Dist EAST MARION -Mist. bends & offsets In Seice Date: Main Main Project:may be requiredCompl. DWg. By: Date: Hydt Hydt Project: NDTES1 1. PLACE A 901 LONG •19. GRADE 420 STEEL EPDXY COATED EXISTING TRANSVERSE JOINT DEFORMED BAR MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION EXISTING TRANSVERSE JOINT —� (\- -UNTIED — EXISTING TRANSVERSE JOINT � E%ISTINC TRANSVERSE JOINT 709-04 OF THE NYS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AT BOTH REPAIRNGT lENGTN 1EPAIR 1M NJ EXISTING LONGITUDINAL TM ICNESS.ETS F THE MAINTANU AT URE AT MINIMUMA 75mm CLEARAH OF ALF THE SLAB NCE BETWEEN LENGT UNTIED LONGITUDINAL JOINT SEE NOTE 11 ON SEE NOTE 5 SEE JOINT THE BARS AND THE STRUCTURE, JOINTS, AND JOINT BARS. THE SEE NOT DWG. PR-IA ANO DETAIL CON OWG. PR-1I — NOTE 8 BARS NAY BE BENT TO ACHIEVE CLEARANCE. NO SEPARATE XISTING LONGITUDINAL ON DWG. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR THIS WORK, BUT THE COST SHALL OINTS PR-1ABE INCLUDED INTHE PRICE BID FOR ITEM 502.6030--10. 2. USE EPDXY COATED WELDED WIRE FABRIC. MW19-I OOmm X toomm REINFORCING BARS EXISTING CATCH BASIN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 709-08 OF THE NYS SEE NOTE 4 �\ SEE NOTE 3 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. MAINTAIN A T5mm CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE WIRE MESH AND ALL JOINTS, JOINT BARS AND TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL A RE INF Ofl[ING BARS UIILITIES. PAYMENT Fqt iNE WELDEO WIRE fAeRIC IS INCWDEO G SEE NOTE I UNDER (TEN 502.6030--10. WELDED WIRE WISH — TRANSVERSE ESPANS ION SEE NOTE 2 E - 3. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE DRILLINL OF THE TRANSVERSE E EXISTING CURBJOINT DETAIL A DOWELS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET THE EXISTING FRAME AND GRATE/LOVER. PAYMENT FOR THIS TING MANHOLE WORK WILL BE MADE UNDER ITEM 604.0721--10. NOTE 3 CURB TO BE REPLACEDWELDED WIRE WESx 600M WIN.) 60C. (MIND AS NECESSARY 4. USE •19. GRADE 4I0 STEEL EPDXY COATED DEFORMED BARS SEE NOTE 2 MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 70TH Of THE NYS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS PLACED AT A DEPTH OF HALF iNE PLAN VIEW SLAB THICKNITH FOR ROOVE STRUCTURES ENCIRCLE THE D LONGITUDINAL JOINT SEE NOTE II ON CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR AT EXISTING CATCH BASIN FORSTRURECTANGULAR6 STRUCTURESS. PLACE A 900ED A 1 LONGM OF ?BAR PR-IA AND DETAIL C ON DWG. PR-IB. NOT TO SCALE AT EACH CORNER. MAINTAIN A HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF NOTES 75. BETWEEN THE BARS AND THE JOINTS, JOINT BARS AND THIS LANE CONFIGURATION 15 SHOWN FOR PAVEMENT INFORMATION ONLY UTILITIES, THE BARS MAY BE BENT TO ACHIEVE CLEARANCES. PLAN VIEW IT MAY NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE CONFIGURATION IN THIS PROJECT. NO SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR THIS WORK, BUT THE COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE BID FOR ITEM CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR AT EXISTING MANHOLE 502.6030--10. NOTE:MAY NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT TO SCALE EXISTING PLC 5. THE MINIMUM PAVEMENT REPAIR LENGTH AT CATCH BASINS OR ITEM 502.6030-10 PAVEMENT MANHOLES SHALL BE THE FRAME OPENING LENGTH PLUS 1.2 IT THIS LANE CONFIGURATION SHOWN FOR PAVEMENT INFORMATION ONLY THE CONFIGURATION IN THIS PROJECT. METERS 1600 mm ON EACH 510E OF THE FRAME OPENING). �'--^-A T/2 6. SEE DWG. PR-IB FOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONS. ' 04 T/2 7. SEE DWG. PR-IA FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL A (DWG. PR-I0) 5100mm = ITEM 502.1007--I8 W ITEM 502.3101--I8 "T" THICKNESS OFEXISTING PCC PAVEMENT REPAIR LENGTH - SEE NOTE 5 —SLOPE BASED ON SUBBASE STABILITY ITEM 304.0001--I8 - FOR NO PROPOSED RESURFACING FOR PROPOSED RESURFACING SEE NOTE 7 ON SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS DWG.PR-IA ITEM 407.0101 DETAIL D MIN.6 fRAME OPENING LENGTH 600mm TACK COAT SEE NOTE 17 USE WHEN THERE IS 101 OR LESS BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF MIN. NIN. ON ONG PRA A THE PAVEMENT AND THE TOP OF THE STRUCTURE THICKNESS "P' ITEM 502.6030--10 NOT TO SCALE OF EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT 7 5mm TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL A (OWG. PR-I8) T/2 ITEM 502.1001--I8 W ITEM 502.3101--I8 T/2 REPAIR LENGTH - SEE NOTE 5 _ _ _ _ `REINFORCING BAR I IF IrT.OR LESS ITEM 304.0001--IB FOR NO PROPOSED RESURFACING FOR PROPOSED RESURFACING SEE NOTE 9 SEE Ei411 0 WELDED WIRE MESH SEE NOTE 7 ON SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS ITEM 40T.0101 SEE NOTE 2 / ONG. PR-IA TACK COAT SEE NOTE 17 "T" = THICKNESS OF 600 am FRAME OPENING LENGTH 600mm ON ONG PR-IA EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT MIN. MIN. STRUCTURE TOP SLAB ITEM 502.6030--10 5mm 300. L ITEM K 304,10119917 SECTION G-C MIN ITYPi .� 2 SEE NOTEOTE 6 6 ON OWL. PR-IA NOT TO SCALE T/2 TNILK NESS"T" IF IOpnm OR LESS PREPARED 81't ALTERED BYt OF EXISTING PCC SEE DETAIL 0 ONN Oft PAVE AT WELDED WIRE MESH- ;pp mm "T" = THICKNESS OF SEE NOTE 2 EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT ITEM 203.02 N 309.10119917 MIN ITYP.1 SEE NOTE 6 ON DWG. PR-IA SECTION E-E REINFORCING BAR REV15FD O I -25-20 1 O SEE NOTE I NOT i0 SCALE 1\L V JL G J ORIGDAAL 09/24/05 REVISED 1OV15107 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 wg. a.: STOREKEEPER COPY R lc C'ONRErc TT3 PAVEMENT'REPAIIt DETAIL D-(25) Notes: F7d. Sketch By: Date: Drown By:CMIJDN Date:01125110 TOWn:EAST MARION -AU restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Pep By: Insp. By: Sca1e:AS NOTED Sheet57 Ot64 rownship:SOUTHOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Mop No:23T Serv.Order No: J of Sevices: Fire Dist EAST MARION -Misc. bends & offsets to Service Date: Main Order Na: Main Project: may be required % Compl. Owg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: NOTES4 1. PLACE A 900m LONG •19. GRADE 420 STEEL EPDXY COATED EXISTING TRANSVERSE JOINT EXISTING TRANSVERSE JOINT DEFORMED BAR MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION EXISTING TRANSVERSE JOINT EXISTING TRANSVERSE JOINT �. 709-04 OF THE NYS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AT BOTH -\ REPAIR I.8m REPAIR 1.8m CORNERS OF THE STRUCTURE AT A DEPTH OF HALF THE SLAB LENGTH (MIN.) LENGTH IMINJ EXISTING LONGITUDINAL THICKNESS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 75. CLEARANCE BETWEEN UNTIED LONGITUDINAL JOINT SEE NOTE It ON SEE NOTE 5 SEE JOINT THE BARS AND THE STRUCTURE. JOINTS, AND JOINT BARS. THE SEE NOTE 5 SEE DWG. PR-IA AND DETAIL C ON DWG. PR-IB. NOTE 8 BARS MAY BE BENT TO ACHIEVE CLEARANCE. NO SEPARATE NOTE 8 EXISTING LONGITUDINAL ON pMC. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR THIS WORK, BUT THE COST SHALL ON COS. JOINTS PR-IA BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE BID FOR ITEM 502.6030--10. PR-IA 2. USE EPDXY COATED WELDED WIRE FABRIC. MW19-IOOmm X IOOmm REINFORCING BARS EXISTING CATCH BASIN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 109-08 Of THE NYS SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 3 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. MAINTAIN A 75. CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE WIRE MESH AND ALL JOINTS, JOINT BARS AND TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL A REINFORCING BARS UTILITIES. PAYMENT FOR THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC IS INCLUDED Cj Cj / SEE NOTE I UNDER ITEM 502.6030--10. MELDED WIRE WESH - TRANSVERSE EXPANSION SEE NOTE 2 ,F E ' EXISTING CURB 7. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE DRILLING OF THE TRANSVERSE J DOWELS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET THE JOINT DETAIL A EXISTING FRAME AND GRATE/COVER. PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK WILL BE MADE UNDER ITEM 604.0121--10. WELDED WIRE WESN ENIS iING MANHOLE GOO.. (MII.)A L J L 600m )MIN.) AS NECESSARY MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 709-04 OF THE ITS SEE NOTE 3 CURB TO BE REPLACED 4. USE -19, GRADE 420 STEEL EPDXY COATED DEFORMED BARS SEE NOTE 2 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS RACED AT A DEPTH OF HALF THE PLAN VIEW SLAB THICKNESS. FOR ROUND STRUCTURES ENCIRCLE THE STRIIC TIME WITH 6 BARS,OVERLAPPED A MINIMUM OF 75mm. UNTIED LONGITUDINAL JOINT SEE NOTE I ON CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR AT EXISTING CATCH BASIN FOR RECTANGULAR STRUCTURES, PLACE A 900mm LONG BAR DWG. PR-IA AND DETAIL C ON DWG. PR-IB. NOT TO SCALE AT EACH CORNER. MAINTAIN A HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF NOTE: 75. BETWEEN THE BARS AND THE JOINTS, JOINT BARS AND THIS LANE CONFIGURATION IS SHOWN FOR PAVEMENT INFORMATION ONLY UTILITIES. THE BARS MAY BE BENT TO ACHIEVE CLEARANCES. IT MAY NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE CONFIGURATION IN THIS PROJECT. NO SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR THIS WORK, BUT PLAN VIEW THE COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE BID FOR ITEM CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR AT EXISTING MANHOLE 502.6030--10. NOTE: NOT TO SCALE ITEM 502.6030--10 EXISTING PCC 5. THE MINIMUM PAVEMENT REPAIR LENGTH AT CATCH BASINS OR THIS LANE CONFIGURATION IS SHOWN FOR PAVEMENT INFORMATION ONLY PAVEMENT MANHOLES SHALL BE THE FRANC OPENING LENGTH PLUS 1.2 METERS 1600 mm ON EACH SIDE OF THE FRAME OPENING). IT NAY NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE CONFIGURATION IN THIS PROJECT. IS T/2 6. SEE DWG. PR-IB FOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONS. 7. SEE DWG. PR-1A FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES T/2 TRANSVERSE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL A MOD. PR-IBI M OD= "T" = THICXNESS OF ITEM 50Z.1001--18 8 ITEM 502.7101-18 EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT REPAIR LENGTH - SEE NOTE 5 SLOPE BASED ON SUBBASE STABILITY ITEM 304.0001--IB FOR NO PROPOSED RESURFACING FOR PROPOSED RESURFACING SEE NOTE 7 ON SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS DETAIL D DWG. PR-IA ITEM 401.0101 600. FRAME OPENING LENGTH Goo. _ TACK COAT SEE NOTE 17 USE WHEN THERE IS IDOmm OR LESS BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF MIN. MIN. ON DWC PR-IA THE PAVEMENT AND THE TOP OF THE STRUCTURE THICKNESS "T" ITEM 502.fi070--10 NOT i0 SCALE OF EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT 75mm nFOR RSE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL A IDWC. PR-IBI i/2 502.1001--I8 N ITEM 502.3101--I8 REPAIR LENGTH - SEE NOTE 5 7/2 F 1 OR LESS RESURFACING FOR PROPOSED RESURFACING__ _ _ PEE NOT 4 BAR �EE OEtAIt 0 ITEM EE NOTE 7 OWELDED WIRE MESH f SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 7 ONSEE TYPICAL SECTIONS ITEM COAT S1 SEE NOTE 2DWG. PR-IA 1ACK COAT SEE NOTE 1i "i" > THICKNESS OF FRAME OPENING LENGTH 600mmON DWG Pfl-IA EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT MIN. STRUCTURE TOP SLAB 75. ITEM 502.6030--10 REM 203.02 L 104.101 SECTION • ,' SEE NOTE 6 ON ONG. PR-IA-IA N07 TO SCALELE MIN ITYP.I S00. i/2 T.�T i/12 THICKNESS "P' SEE O TAIL OR PREPARED BY, ALTERED BYI Of EKISTING PCC 1 pM ON PAVEMENT WELDED WIRE MESH- 700 mm "T" = THICKNESS OF SEE NOTE 2 MIN ITYP.1 EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT ITEM 203.02 ! 304.10119917 SEE NOTE 6 ON DWG. PR-IA SECTION E-E REINFORCING BAR SEE NOTE 1 NOT TO SCALE REVISED O 1 -25-2010 ORIGINAL 09/24/05 REVISED 10/IS/07 CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 e ro/ec wg. o.: STOREKEEPER COPY RID CONRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAIL D-(26) Notes. Fla. Sketch By: Date: Drawn By:CMIJDN Date:011t170 Town:EAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to Field Prep By: Insp. By: $cale:AS NOTED Sheets$ Of 64 Township:SOU THOLD N.Y.S. specs. Contractor: Map No23T Serv.Order No: If of Sevices: Fire Dist EAST MARION -Misc. bends & offsets In Service Date: Main Order No: Main Project: may be required Compl. Dwg. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: TREELEGEND TREE TREE DIST.FROM 7REE TREE DIST.FROM TREE TREE DIST.FROM NO. STATION TREE TYPE DLO. TRENCH ACTION TO BE TAKEN NO. STATION TREE TYPE DIAL TRENCH ACTION TO BE TAKEN NO. STATION TREE TYPE DIAL TRENCH ACTION TO BE THEN 1 t+23 MAPLE 33' 9g NONE 53 82+07 EASTERN RED CEDAR 1 4W NONE 105 137+95 HORNBEAM S. 24• NONE 2 1+ LINDEN 17' 14/• NOW 54 82+15 EASTERN RED CEDAR 3' 48' NONE 107 13B+SO MAPLE it 21' NONE 3 1+00 75 MAPLE 131 NONE 55 82+24 EASTERN RED CEDAR g 4W NONE 108 139+02 HORNBEAM 4' Ar NONE I 7+75 MAPLE 17' 70g NONE 50 82+80 SYCAMORE MAPLE 14' 1W NONE 109 139+2D RED MAPLE 3g log NONE 5 1+80 MAPLE 41r 78g NONE 57 BBN9 MAPLE 50' B{• NONE 110 139a60 HORNBEAM g 95' NONE 8 1aB5b2+70 MAPLE CLUSTER <g 12g NONE 58 93+10 MAPLE 31• 81• NONE 717 140+32 OAK 2/• 8{• NONE 7 7+80 MAPLE W 120• NONE 50 93+07 PEAR g 51' NONE 112 1H+10 OAK 3g 8/' NONE 8 3+10 LINDEN 77• 12P NONE 00 94+23 PEAR g 4g NONE 113 111+80 MAPLE 21• 9g NONE 9 3+90 MAPLE 2g 9g NONE 81 W78 OAK 1 eP NONE 1U 142a0p PEAR g 120' NONE 10 h25b IM0 CHERRYMARECLUSTFR 3'-11 120' NONE 82 t00N1 MAPLE 21• 10g NONE 115 1/2a50 MAPLE 48' BC NONE 11 N75 CHERRY 24' 731 NOTE 83 101+17 OAK 1 5{' NONE 178 142+81 LINDEN 4' 8/' NONE 12 7N0 LOCUST 15. 27g NONE B4 105.78 MAPLE 4g 9g NONE 177 1/2+80 LINDEN 4• BI' NONE 73 7MB MAPLE g 1H' NONE 85 108+25 MAPLE 46' 18g NONE 778 143+00 HORNBEAM g 84' NONE 14 11+82 MAPLE 25' 113r NONE Be tOBM8 MAPLE 41 84' NONE 119 ip+20 HORNBEAM NONE 15 12+58 MAPLE 24• NONE 87 109+10 OAKNONE 15 18+52 CHESTNUT 1g NONE 68109+40 9ERVICEBERRY g 9g NONE 127 143aB0 HORNBENONE 17 25+45 WILLOW g NONE B9 110+43 OAK Zg 78` NONE NONE 18 25+65 LOCUST g NONE TO 111+98 CATALPA 1P 90' NONE 123NONE 18A 25+58 LOCUST' 8' NONENONE 19 28+10 EASTERN RED CEDAR g NONE 72 112NB SYCAMORE AMPLE 80• iM' NONE 125 146+75 HORNBEAM g 12g NONE 20 25+15 EASTERN RED CEDAR g 80' NONE 73 713+01 SYCAMORE MAPLE 3• 24' NONE 728 118+00 MAPLE 24' 1H' NONE 21 25+45 EASTERN RED CEDAR 4• 71 NONE 74 114+23 SYCAMORE MAPLE /• 24' NONE 127 1/8+40 MAPLE 3g 14,' NONE 22 26+65 EASTERN RED CEDAR g 71 NONE 75 114+55 SYCAMORE AMPLE 1' 2{' NONE 128 140+85 HORNBEAM 10' 120• NONE 29 28+75 EASTERN RED CEDAR g 71 NONE 75 115+10 SYCAMORE MAPLE 24• BR NONE 129 147-M HORNBEAM 3g 720' NONE 24 28+79 EASTERN RED CEDAR g 71 NONE 77 115+BB CHERRY 11 71 NONE 130 149+SD MAPLE(NEAR DEAD) 3g 9g NONE 25 27+12 PEAR g 71 NONE 78 115+97 CHERRY 1g 71 NONE 131 154+82 MAPLE 1g 9g NONE 25 25+31 LOCUST 3' 9g NONE 79 117+58 OAK 2g W NONE 132 15N75 OAK 1g Sir NONE 27 29+95 LOCUST g 9g NONE 80 118+87 OAK 2g 71 NOISE 133 158+50 AMPLE 11 Bg NONE 28 1 28+35 1UNKONWN 1' 90' MNONE 127+W SYCAMORE MAPLE29 29N1 RN RED CEDAR 1' 191122a02 OAK30 29+50 RN RED CEDAR 3• 191123+17 OAK31 29+82 N RED CEDAR 3' 192' 121+31 OAK 1 11 NONE 137 159+30 PEAR g 10g NONE 32 40+15 CHERRY 11 7172H71 OAK 1 11 NONE 138 159+80 PEAR g 10g NONE 33 43+36 LOClls7 P 13125H78 OAK g 11 Np1E 139 159H0 PEAR 11 8/' NONE 3/ 43+92 LOCUST 3' 9T2S+90 7ELI(OVA g 21' NONE 110 180+20 PEAR g 9g NONE 35 51+42 EASTERN RED CEDAR S. 91r NONE 88 128+53 OAK 1 24' NONE 141 180+50 PEAR 31r 10g NONE 38 51+44 EASTERN RED CEDAR 4• 96' NONE 89 127-N SYCAMORE MAPLE 24• WNONE 142 700+00 MAPLE 3W 9g NONE 37 38+52 EASTERN RED CEDAR W 48' NONE 90 127+77 HORNBEAM 3/• 114• NONE 143 161+10 MAPLE 1g 9g NONE 30 56HM EASTERN RED CEDAR g 4g NONE 91 120+05 OAK 30' 101 NONE U{ 161+25 LINDEN g 9g NONE 39 57+00 EASTERN RED CEDAR g W NONE 92 129+75 OAK 2g 96' NONE 145 15/+50 MAPLE 2A' 8/' NONE 40 57+09 EASTERN RED CEDAR g 21• NONE 93 130+18 OAK 2' 9g NONE 145 /81+75 MAPLE 3g 9g NONE 41 58+85 to 59+20 AAANTHUS r-S' 71 NONE 94 130+08 OAK 2g 90' NONE 1/7 782+35 ZELKOVA 73' 15g NONE 42 was CHERRY 28' W NONE 95 132+78 REDBUD 0• 3g NONE 1/8 182+50 IELKOVA 12' 141• NONE 13 80N5 EASTERMED DAR 4 84' NONE BB 133*17 RFDBLK) 7 3g NONE 719 183+20 2ELKOVA 71 1N' NONE 44 80+51 EASTERDAR T 120• NONE 97 133+38 REDBUD 1 3C NONE 150 183+80 2EU(OVA /1 1M' NONE 15 80+10 EIL97ERAR 0• 120' NONE 98 73/+2B REDBUD48 82+41 EASTERDAR g 8P NONE 99 134+58 REDBUD47 61+62 EASTERDAR Ir BP NONE 100 134+8548 77+90 EASTERDAR /' 41 NONE 101 135+2340 78+05 EASTER g 4150 79+91 EASTHDAR 1' 4g NONE 103 135+90 SYCAMORE MAPLE 23' 9g IN 1 187+20 OAK {' 84' NONE 80 51 +12 EASTERN RED CEDAR /' 48' NONE 101 138+30 SYCAMORE MAPLE 11 10g NONE 157 170+05 MAPLE g 720' NONE 52 81+81 EASTERN RED CEDAR 4' 4B' NONE /05 730+81 LINDEN g 30' NONE NOTE: A.) EXPLANATION OF ACTION TO BE TAKEN COLUMN CONTRACTOR COPY Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 NONE: FOLLOW GUIDELINES IN GENERAL NOTES STOREKEEPER COPY Y°` °'" TREE LEGEND w9. T- 1 Notes' f7d. Sketch By: Dote: Drawn By:CM/JDN Dote:913109 Town:EAST MARION B.) DIST. FROM TRENCH IS THE DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF —AIL restoration on N.Y.S. EXCAVATION CLOSEST TO TREE TO BARK SIDE OF TREE REVISED 01 -25-2010 N.Y.S.Ospebs done to Field Prep By: sp. By: Scole:AS NOTED Sheet59 Of 64 Township:SOUTHOLD CLOSEST TO ROAD OR ROOT FLARE, WHICH EVER IS LESS REVISED I I - I G-2009 Contractor: Map No23T Senarder No: / of Sevices: Fire Dist.-EAST MARION Misc. bends & offsets REVISED 9-3-2009 —may be required In Service Dote: Main Order No: Main Project: Compt. 0w9. By: Date: Hydt Order No: Hydt Project: RURAL HIGHWAY Notes: I. ShIN114NIM SMOnaybdayfim work t d oaap)w a k atom x_ 2 vuck wMM die Pie rg brake se be an 4 ad�nt 1kkrred away tom to errpbyees In lte work area 3. Tkaw"beeowaken.nonakor aft"Wdarinto $ _ f 4. Any IxAw dbbrrce provided in sdva"of dre banMrvgtide '; a,:` cane speckv not eel," wiaddtothesd*dtheworkarea.Thebulkyspaceb =E. w b exceed 40FT. kom drs and d lhs iw bprb tlw trpirr1 9 of Ire work wea. S. $ide taw 9Wm(NYRA11 or NYR9.12)ale opdww N w4dPded wort;dram Is bore dw 4 hots. d used,Stab '"- 80 FT. Law Si r b be placed 300300 FT.In Wvmm d kft (2 SkIp Una) walk"910n Spoiler 30 200'(a Saw*deed) 4I(1 Skip Use) 35 urc(s 310p taw) 4r(iStlp ► N BMW eavehi is Q . 40 1-/AM UNN) M(1 no Use) Re*ired and TMIA 46 3/0'(!Stlp fir) Ir(2 Skip Uses) w `; Reccew wbed. s. (1181au...) w�Sueu..) NA ti ® C) 55 4W(-13 SMe Uaee) W(2 Skle Uses) TNs ' dial be k�cabd a A each Vehicle ergr Maxkmm SeNlp ® 36Gx18 b. dbbnce d5W(12 Skip hies)peel � ,� on am Sa Nob�3 8 re work 44 W20-1 Y�218 " � SEE MPT TAST—05 DETAIL 36e36In. 36x36 kr !per, (5SNp ' FOR WORK IN GRASS AREA ♦ AND SHOULDER AREA MPT P LAN Arrow Pend _T..Y; 500 FT(Min.) N.T.S. tom® (Caution Mode) _ (1 Reference N 0 tEl� BadaYdsds W611MIA )` 1. FOR LOW—SPEED (35 MPH OR LESS) CONDITIONS, 200 FOOT SIGN 4. Protect the public from damage to person or property ,y SPACING MAY BE USED. FOR SPEEDS OF 40 TO 50 MPH A 350 FOOT which may result directly or indirectly from the my SIGN SPACING MAY BE USED. construction operation YYORKIOIIETRAFFICCOHiROL ,_ 5. Road surface must be maintained so traffic may travel 2. AN ADVANCED WARNING SIGN SHOULD BE USED: IF THE WORK WILL BE at appropriate speed limit. SHORT-TERM STATIONARY +xx;i PERFORMED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE SHOULDER, IF EQUIPMENT 6. Provide ingress and egress to and from intersecting N6 OPERATIONMVDLV '�- 500FT.(Min.) WILL CROSS OR MOVE ALONG THE ROADWAY, OR IF THE ACTIVITY MAY highways, homes, and businesses SHOULDER CLOSURE i (ice DISTRACT MOTORISTS. (PAYED SHOULDER 8 Fr.OR WIDER) Marley) 7. Contractor must provide measures to prevent soil and ON :�. 3. OTHER ACCEPTABLE ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS ARE THOSE INDICATING debris from entering drainage structures and falling from RURALTWOdANE 'f! "SHOULDER WORK OR ROAD WORK AHEAD". hauling equipment CONVENTIONAL HIGHWAY REVISED O I -25-201 O r. NEVI ED I - l -OCMKR20M S I 6 2009 TAST-05 x, NOT TO SCALE REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 SHORT- TERM STATIONARY MPT TAST- C 5 CONTRACTOR COPY " ffolk County Water Authority Oakdale, Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY 1 Oakdale, NY 11769 ct N.T.S. STOREKEEPER COPY ype Pro e1Ylt"]119 1 GNAIVCE&PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC PLAN&DETAIL wg. a.: MPT 41) Notes: Reference—ALL restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations Rd. Sketch By CP Date: Drawn By:RRIJDN Oate:6-17-09 Town:EAST MARION R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. Field Prep By: Insp. By: Plant: Township:SOUTHHOLD specs. Contractor: Map Ref. No(s).:23—T Fire Dist:EAST MARION —Mist. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Scole:AS NOTED I of Sevices: Main Auth: be required Comp. Owg. By: Date: Sheaf 60 O/ 64 Hydt Auth: '- 1.Surface conditions of no t NOTES: t -V temporary Pedestrian Access 1 Surface conditions of all 7 Walkway Routes(PAR)"I at a minimum, Sur on Pedestrian Access q (min.)004AF(b be a stable.than.and slip resistant temporary a RaAPwA.1 an weather compacted gravel surface Shaul Routes(PAR)shall at a minimum, ill Clear area WA;-u or other material capable of meeting be a stable,firm,and slipresistant See Note. I ADAAG requirements.Set EI Of-019. all weather compacted gravel surface b ` or other material capable of meeting 2.Detectable Warnings(DW)art ADAAG requirements.See El 01-019. ; b required w temporary PAIL 1lopenry er afro» at all curb ramp/bleeded transitions pavement met MM301 entering vehicular routes 1. Detectable N 5. new � y Temporary � walkway WS-IC / with ramps. 36xl61n. / Walkway ) 4 WP(min.) � � wia:D �j q Walkway WI-IIA / Clear area 43x24In, 4 ( 1 dear area. 34 x 121n. / See /NQ[a USE PA.2C /��� See Note 1. W I-12A ✓ CROSSWALK 111111018.34 x 12 in. _ -s U ♦ R16-3C CROSSWALK IV IS In. SIDEWALK Reto 24 x 1 / Recommended CLOSED 24 IS in. of f T It or Ill eon ►L barricadeType l of hucing or \\\ Type eaoManous but Barricade 4 y WWI Drum �. /� Drum nusssata Type A } Type A r flashing LightCLOS lK FL flashing light �t E E----^- - -.T .. Wgitl risen nr Work area � „ � �m Unrrkade Shoulder -' Work aws qr s NYSDOT 61&PT NYSDOT.Nt&El FORSNArfJ FOR OPERATION INVOLVING ! e a �orn.lAif OPERA'i'IONINVOLYNIC SIDEWALK CLOSURE y 1. PEDESTRIAN DETOUR WITH A). PEDESTRIAN DETOUR + =ate i SHOULDER CLOSURE OFF ROADWAY NOT TO SC. Atlt:tisT20" PED-1 AUGUST2004 PED-3 - NOT TO SCALF. NOTE: COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104, DATUM: N.A.D.1927 rT OR COPY �ffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway R COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 ype SIDEWALK CLOSURE W PEDESTRIAN DETOUR OFF ROADWAY MPT - 2� PER COPY Au honzations nd. Sketch By:CP Dote: Grown By:RB Date.I 1-16-09 Town:EAST MARION on N.Y.S.done to N.Y.S. Feld Prep By: Insp. By: Plant: Township:$OUTHHOLD REVISED 6-2009 CantraContractor. Map Ref. No(s).:13-T Fre Dist:EAST MARION 11-l REVISED 9-3-2009 -Mist. bends & offsets may In Service Date: ScoIe:AS NOTED j of Sevices: Main Auth: be required Co-pl. owy. By: Date: Shee161 Of 64 jHydt Aath: ®♦ "�� Low speed highways � � '•= ••�1 � +r (<43mph) 300 FT '_ ` "d (-7 Skip Man) n nsr° A ♦ asacmes Locate 290 FT from ® Sip to be placed Fkegger(7 Skip lines) 300 FT 300 to 300 FT in advance (%the distance between +;'s of Initial warning sip Fla M (-7 Ship flossfloss ,T1 on each Flogger end flogger sign, E approach. but of least 200 R). ♦ A Flag tree Is not required is low speed urban locatlouL t I S6i FT(t4 Skip Lines) 300 FT (2 Sklp/aaw) (-7 Skip Ilaes) r r ._..�c�s<-s z `4ti � .�} wr-.Y�'•t r;y4 +�,�*r I 300 FT ®� (-7 Skip Haas) if Flogger Is with 300 FT of Intersection,install flogger i warning signs on Cron t N FT street. ® 1 2406 in_ (2 Skip Ross) (Portable supports) so rr (2 Skip Ices) Ceae maetaa not W0-IC to exceed 40 Fr. ® 3606In. 29olrr (i Skip Line) 888 1s skip Nors) NOTES: I wa zzC 00 1. THE W5-6 SHARED ROADWAY SIGN ALERTS MOTORIST ® 36x36In. (7 Skip(paal sa Pr TO THE PRESENCE OF BICYCLISTS. 14 ski( p Llaee) W0-6C m 2. THE SURFACE SHOULD BE FREE OF LOOSE DEBRIS AND 3606 in. a, GRAVEL t Work area 3. WORK ZONE MUST PROVIDE SAFE, CONVENIENT •(• { A®A PASSAGE FOR BICYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS, WHERE Flag free _ x PERMITTED. A .♦ Zeroingnags-optional lolmom iaxis In. 300 FT NVSDOTM1JT �•',. (-7Skiplion) 4. PEDESTRIAN DETOURS SHOULD BE FREE OF FOR A_ W3ftFT OBSTRUCTIONS, DEBRIS AND TRIPPING HAZARDS. SHORT-DURATION STATIONARY OPERATION INVOLVINGr . LANE CLOSURE PRIOR To 1\TERSECTION „�' WITH FT.ACCER CONTROL (-7 Skip lines) ON w w W - Lo sree <D 43. ( MPHI NV CU BNTI N O AL HIGHWAY ^j,� 3ErTL11ULN 7tM TASDCq �"'!'� - � NO T TO SCALE NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY �ffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 STOREKEEPER COPY wg. o.: ,rx SNORT-DURATION STATIONARY TRAFFTC PLAN& DETAILS MPI -(3) ales Authonzatioerrs FId. Sketch By:CP Date: Drawn—All restoration on N.Y.S. By:RB Date:11-16-09Town:EAST MARION R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. Reld Prep By: Insp. By: Plant: Township:$OUTNHOLD REVISED / I- !6-2009 specs. Contractor Map Re% No(s).:23—T Fire Dist:EAST MARION REVISED 9-3-2009 -Mist. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Scale:AS NOTED be required / o/ Sevices: Main Auth: Compl. Deg. By: Date: Sheet62 DI 64 Hydt Auth: LOW SPEED URBAN HIGHWAY � . (�mph) T ® RURAL HIGHWAY "n Notes: (S Skip Ines 1.in uhan mmfifio s.advance warring sgn aQac:9 m W See Nab I Holes: � be reduwd b a f00 n order b acoeemsadab svb Bawler vahk*s ass not regvad to Beg^apaaxeess. streets and dti ea"s. A bift space nay be pbrided aware haft Gonda me 5DO FT.(13 Slop Liss) 2.BMW Ydides as not aspired for IsWV operaYons. 200 FT.(5 SNP Linea) allow. A btft spats may be povidod elvers tra5csal6Bafa A 2.Careerkm cons are opbal aw may be siatitalld 5W FT. aaew. 2DO FT. (Oplieeai) whose spats corank s slat R tones ae sad.oboe (13 Sop trwa) T Ss{ lob 5 3.CetMl:a tabs are and may be elsmialed (5 SW Liss) Sec Nob 6 flem 100 FT(Mn.)Fran BaW. Ahab some constranb acst It cuss am used.plow 3.Stab Law a¢r(NYR9.11 or NYW12)are aptlOtbl f as 5W FT.(13 Skip sisal ism 100 FT.(Lin)From lagga. 200 FT.(5 Skip Ines) alladpated work dwaion is less feels 4 thus.6 used, 4.Steve Law son(NYRO-11 or NYR9-12)an oplMd IF the T SIGN Less sign to be placed 10W FT.in edam"of antepabd week deafen is less dw 4 hauc Ifused, n0al waming sign. 250 FT(Afa.}-s . Stab fast$ign b be placed 1000 FT n advance d 100 FT.04n.) ) 20D FT. 4.FbWw SymW Sign{WA7e)ors!'ONE LANE ROAD bum Flagga SW FT. htw era Is SiWL Fran Fbggw (5 Slap Lim) AHEAD'Sgn(W2D4)shah be bind ed,oweed at hoed +i. (13Sluplirbs) 5.na W Symbd Srgn IW20.76)MW-ONE LAW ROAD 3 away 1Rm mad uses When Aepgsg opetabrs are o0l Z I, NEAW Sign(W20heep 4)s be rowed,co%wW or 80 FT. 120 FT. Z.` tamed assay Gam road uses MW Aag9ig operations, (25kP line.) S ShouN the aalBequem W prior btlb advance eani g {3 Skip Lines) as net owAomg. sigrm f "BE PREPARED TO STOP sip can be added to 6.Shmsd tM befit:qwn up prig b the aMa ce wamxg 200,100 FT. thee sign anis al ivee l A sfwwn a fa adws all w= 2OD-M Fr. v' sigh Bee 1E P REPAREDTO STOP Sip am bee added b (S7 Slop Lies 100 FT.des. wamig sign sail slag be moved b a Ixaim prior b (5-T Slap Leas)''" 100 FL Ms. fb sign sales a fb laafm shown or the erneaNerae Rho queued eaft i`,". ... waret9so sebsshal be moved be boaim pft to S Skip Loss) 25 Sko Lm") de 4awd ballfc. Cow W2D-?& W34 ; Cow spacing not 3SKM 3&M in. 36x36 n. to axcesd 40 FT. 38x36 n• IT. /✓ b exceed 40 FT. T� (I SWP LM) V Slop LIre) t3 , 36 41 36rd 1 6in Note 2 36s36 A This sign alai be boated s. tbia xM dud be m� 100 Ff.Max. G20-2 a Modm m diatars of t00 FT.Max L�2 5W(12 SapLkm)t sd (25 Skip LiN) 36xIBin. $gg'{12 SkID Liss)Pas .5Sdp Liss) 38xi8 n. to or Sap Lnesl past 80 FT. M week area. R Skip Lim) fs work aee� � 120 FT. VJ20-1 200 FT. ( W20.1 . + 13 Skip Lives) x b" 1 (5 stop 1.iaa) TOD FT Ohl Fmm FlrgOer 38x38 its 7 �� AOL To Rag Tree #ems � A}� (13 Skip lineal 0 —250 FT.04rQ Gal) e keen RaBgeAdh !� Week And See NOW B ; ,.. Y1ark sea 200 FT. (Optional) ` M11500T g (s Skip Lines) so c a5 WORN LONETIWFICCWiTR1R i 500FT. SORT-TERM STATIONARY (1351A1tras) OPER YM WOUmc SRORT•TEJUI STATIONARY .., DAYTIME OPERAnON WVCLYeee1 LANE CLOSURE WITH FLAGGERS r ISSrgtineei DAYTIME ON Sm Nob 1 LANE CLOSURE WITH FLAGGERSON T 500. LOW SPEED URBAN(304•seph) i RURAL (13 ft Li es) TW04ANE CONVENTIONAL RIGHWAY TW04 ANE CONVENTIONAL HIGHWAY FEIRU01`2009 TAST-CULL NOT TO SCALE FEBRUARY 2009 TAST-CiR I NOT TO SCALE NOTE COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 CONTRACTOR COPY ffo& County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 YPe rolec wg. o.: STOREKEEPER COPY SHORT-TERM STATIONARY TRAFFTC PLAN& DETAILS MP'T 44) _ Notes: A Reference tns Fla. Sketch By:CP Date: Drawn By:RB Date:1 1-16-09 Town:EAST MARION -All restoration on N.Y.S. R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. Field Prep By: Insp. By: Plant: Township:SOUTHHOLD REVI5ED 1 1- 16-2009 Specs. Contractor: Map Ref. No(s).:23-T Fire Dist:EAST MARION REVI5EO 9-3-2009 —Miss. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Scole:AS NOTED d of Sevices: Main Auth: be required Compl. Dwg, By: Dote: Sheet 63 Of 64 Hydt Auth: HIGH SPEED URSM HIGHWAY (45-M M0) s y® Mobs '� 1.Samar vehicbs am rot nm*KW br fAMV operatiea. A dear spas may be pros dad Whm kd0c osnddora 350 FT 0 skip Lrm) alkew. *1 2.Canlartia mrae ets apkurl erdmay be ainrealed 350 F7 - 0 spew maeairds east dmnseae used.pm (I)Skip ems) 'r them 100 FT.(kin.)Frme itapyer. 3 Shale tau"a IWVWIt a NYR9-12)am eptimw I the 350 S*FT(9W Leas) attidpaad wank&xadm b lem lean 4 hmm Bused, Stae taw sign b be plewd 1000 FT in adwara of katla)wemilg sips 1 T5 FT(Aie}—►4 4.Flange Synod Sin(W20-Ta)and"ONE LANE ROAD hum RNAW 350 FT. AFEAD'Sign(WM4)steel be renwod,meaad or trued s (9 Slip LnmI mmad h umswen meta�'ka isi0k9°p'ek°'a 120FT S -':2 5.Sh s bait qm up prior b Me ad arm vas dng (3 5kq Unes) sigra to'BE PREPARED M STOP'siga can be added to Om sign series at der bcakm slows or Be erire alAmm ym,ij sign series aW be aped to a onion ow is i5-T�F lkas 100 FT k4at. 1M Queued lneie. 4.5 Skip liar) WnTa WS4 36x36 n 3605 b. Cone Wa*Q net b exceed 40 FT. (t Skip Live) W2" 3&M im Nm 1 Ttas up shal be bmted G20-2 a tdaineae diefarca Of 14D FT.Max 3608 kt eve work ems)pm 5 Skip Liras) W20.1 {►°. 120 FT 36s36 in i (3 Skip Lkm) T 350 fT. I Fag no '• (9 Skip Liasl _ team Fb99e work area lOptiarnq See Nola 5 NPSDOT WOR11 ZONE TRAFFIC 350 FT SHORT TERM STATIONIUTr OPERATION WNOLwING i AN DAYWIT TON LE CLOSURE WITH FLADOERS ON 350 FT. HIGH SPEED W WN SS apt► T (9 Slap lies) tff TYIIOdANE COMIfE11T1ONA1UI l HIGHWAY FENRUAAY zone TAST-C1UN NOT TO SCALE REVISED l I- 16-2009 REVISED 9-3-2009 NOTE., COORDINATE SYSTEM: N.Y. STATE PLANE FEET, L.I. ZONE 3104; DATUM: N.A.D.1927 NOTE THAT M.P.T. (LANE SHIFT) WILL BE MOVED FORWARD ON A CONTRACTOR coPr C ffo& County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Highway DAILY BASIS. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE INSPECTOR COPY Oakdale, NY 11769 INSTALLING APPROXIMATE. 500' OF MAIN PER DAY. ALL ype rolec ..g. o.: DISTURBED ASPHALT WILL BE REPLACE WITH TEMPORARY STOREKEEPER COPY SHORT-TERM STATTONARYTRAFFTC PLAN&DETAILS RIFF -(S) _ PAVEMENT DAILY. THE M.PT. WILL ADVANCE ON A DAILY BASIS Notes: Reference Fld. Sketch By:CP Date: Dawn By:RB Oote:1-16-09 Town:EAST MARION —All restoration on N.Y.S. Authorizations WITH THE WORK. LANE SHIFT INTO THE OPPOSITE SHOULDER AT R.O.W. to be done to N.Y.S. Field Prep Ry: 1—ta Plant: Township:SOUTHHOLD 6:ANY SINGLE LOCATION ION WILL ONLY BE NEEDED FOR SHORT specs.DURATIONS. Cantractar Map Ref. No(s).:23—T Tire Dist EAST MARION —Mist. bends & offsets may In Service Date: Scale:AS NOTED / of SeNces: Main Auth: - be required Campl. Dwg. Dy: Date: Sheet 64 Of 64 Hydt Auth: