Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFriedman, Jami & JoelJill M. Doherty, President James F. King, Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. John Bredemeyer Town H~lAnnex 54375MainRoad P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL - ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT Applicant: Jami & Joel Friedman Date of Receipt of Application: June 30, 2010 SCTM#: 89-3-11.5 Project Location: 830 Clearview Road, Southold Date of Resolution: July 21, 2010 Reviewed by: Board of Trustees Project Description: To trim the phragmites and remove dead trees from wetland area and adjacent area. Findings: The Board of Trustees DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the application as submitted. The project does not meet the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, and the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP. No operations, maintenance, or other activities can take place immediately landward of the wetland boundary as designated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. This is not a determination from any other agency. ~i~l M. Doherty., President I~bard of Trustees Jill M, Dohe~ty, President James F. King, Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr, John Bredemeyer P.O Box 1179 Southol& NY 11971 Telephone {631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E. on behalf of JAMI & JOEL FRIEDMAN requests an Administrative Permit to trim the phragmites and remove dead trees from wetland area and adjacent area. Located: 830 Clearview Rd., Southold. SCTM#89-3-11.5 Type..~ea to be impacted: Jc.8~ltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of/T-d'wn Code proposed work falls under: ~"apt.275 __Chapt. 111 ,other Type of Application: I~¢~'letland __Coastal Erosion __Amendment __Administrative__Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: 1/J.King _~.Doherty ~ .U~Bredemeyer B.Ghosio, __ D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, N-g 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Jill Doherty, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: July 19, 2010 'L/~? ..... Sout~o!d Tc ',r~ Boa~a of Tr,4s~e,,s Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for JAMI & JOEL FRIEDMAN SCTM#1000-89-3-11.5 Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E. on behalf of JAMI & JOEL FRIEDMAN requests an Administrative Permit to trim the phragmites and remove dead trees from wetland area and adjacent area. Located: 830 Clearview Rd., Southold. SCTM#1000-89-3-11.5 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the below Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. The number, condition and type of trees have not been identified. The area in which "dead trees" are proposed for removal is listed as 8,840 sq ft. Correspondingly the trees serve as a buffer between the developed area and wetland system. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands Provide adequate buffers between wetlands and adjacent or nearby uses and activities in order to ensure protection of the wetiand's character, quality, values, and functions. The adequacy of the buffer depends on the fo/lowing factors: E. Maintain buffers to ensure that adverse effects of adjacent or nearby development are avoided: 1. Maintain buffers to achieve a high filtration efficiency of surface runoff. 2. Avoid permanent or unnecessary disturbance within buffer areas. 3. Maintain existing indi.qenous vegetation within buffer areas. The trimming of phragmite austalis is an EXEMPT action and not subject to coastal consistency review. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney Jill M. Doherty, President James F. King, Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. John Bredemeyer Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application/ --Wetland Permit Application ~" Administrative Permit AmendmentdTrans fer/Exteal~sio n ./~Received Application:~{~ ~.I~ . , ./ Received Fee:$~l ,....-'Completed Application (L'q/~ _d-Z'h![O Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted__ Coordination:(date sent) · -/EWRP Consistency ACsessment Form ./(gAC Referral Sent:lCd| ~ u,D~teoflnspection: "Q.! lq!th Receipt of CAC Report: Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: ~P~blic Hearing Held: t)!t:~ I[[~ Resolution: Name of Applicant 'N/"'~'/I Address /t-d/o'/v-'F'/'g, 7'2> AJ Phone Number:( Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - ~ Property Location: (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) (If applicable) Address: ,:~e:5~ oard of Trustees Applica Land Area (in square feet): GENERAL DATA Area Zoning: Previous use of property: Intended use of property: Covenants and Restrictions: Yes v~ No If "Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance fi.om the Zoning Board of Appeals __ If "Yes", please provide copy of decision. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date 7~t-~ ~ ~ 7-~ ¥-07 /v~a-~, Yes / No __ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permWapproval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? No ~ Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): OBoard of Trustees Applica~n WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose ofthe proposed operations: 7~ /k') t'FtO~0 ~ 2~c<'~,t-- Area of wetlands on lot: / 7~ o~ ~ square feet Percent coverage of lot: ..5, 6,0 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~'6. / feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: /~]~ feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? c/ No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? /V/~ cubic yards How much material will be filled? /19/~- cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: kJ/~ Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: /:5~.,A ~ Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: A//]~ feet Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No ¢/~ Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? ~/ No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? ~/fi How much mater/al will be filled? ~v//} Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) PROJECT ID NUMBER SEQR PART1-PROJECTINFORMATION APPLICANT / SPONSOR 617.20 APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only ( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 2. PROJECT NAME ~:;)o-r ' ~ ~z-~ county Municipality ~) 4. PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections, prominent landmarks etc -or r)rovide mar) DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? [~Yes [] No If no, descdbe briefly: IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) ential []Industrial [---]Commercial r--~Agriculture r--']Park/Forest/OpenSpace []Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, Stateor Lccal) [~es [] No If yes. list agency name and permit / approval: 11.DOES ANY~IY A,~°A ECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [~Yes [~o If yes. list agency name and permit / approval: 12. AS A RESU~_T OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PR.~IDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponsor Name -v ~ ---- ~// -- Date: ~' ~O~ Signatur(~,.~ · If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.47 If yes, coordinate fha renew process and uae the FULL EAF. r-I 171"0 B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNUSTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declam6~n may be superseded by another involved agency. r-I - 171.o C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH T]..E FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwntlefl, if legible) Cl. E~ air quality, sun'ace or groundwater quality or quan6ty, r~se lsvets, e.~is~g lrafifc pattern, solid waste prnduc~n or disposal, potefiflal for efoskxl, drainage or flooding problorua? E.~alo bde~. 02. Ae~he~c, egdcultoral, archaeoleglest, historic, or other natural or cultural msoorcua; or summundy or neighborhood character? Explain bdetiy: ° I C3. Vegetation or fauna, tish, sh~ltish or wlidiife species, slgnltiCant habitats, or Ihrrmtrmed or endangered species? Explain briefly:. C4. A ;/~ ~i,',~nity's =~;~;, ~ plans or g~els as ~IN ~, ~ a ~e le = ~ b~ d ~ d ~ ~ ~ na~ ~? P-~i~ b~: ~. Gr~, ~ ~o~, ~ m~t~ a~ li~y to ~ ~u~ ~ ~ ~ a~? ~n b~fl~ ~. ~r ;ii~,(i~i~ ~g~ In ~ ~ el~r qua~ or ~ of e~ ~n ~ D. ~EL ~E PR~ECT HA~ ~ IMPACT ON ~E E~R~ME~AL ~C~RI~I~ T~T ~USED THE E~ABUSHMENT OF A CRI~L E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO SEI CONTROVERSY RELATED TO'POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If ~es PART I# - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by,a~ency) INSTRUCTIONS; F~reachadvemeeftectidentifledabeve~determinewhathoritlssubatan~at~arge~important~r~amnvlsesigni~canL EaCh effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. Unban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) Irreversibiltiy; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necossary, add attachments or reference suppo~ltng materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of pert ii was checked yes, the,detentfination of sig nlflcar~e must evaluate the potential Impec~ of the proposed ac~on on the envlmnmentel characteristics of am CEA Check this box ffyou have Iden6rmd one or more potantlal~ la~ge or olgnlflcant adversu impade wly, ch MAy occur. Than proceed directiy to f~e FULl EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box ff you have determined, based Ofl the information and ansty~ls above and any supp~ll~g documentation, fbat the pmpeeed actiot WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attaclxneflts an necessmy, the masons SUpporting thl: determination.. Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Jill M. Doherty /~lPd._nt or Type Name of Responsible Officer io Lead Agency  Slgrinture of~spo~slble ~ler in Lead Agency Date President Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Pmparor (Il'different from responsible officer) Board of Trustees AppliCon AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) (print owner of property) residing at (mailing address do hereby authorize (Agent) to apply for peri, it(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. /( O~ner ~ s signature ) 8 Board of Trustees Applic~ion County of Suffolk State of New York DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ,20 ! ~ APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics orohibits conflicts of interest on the hart of town officers and emolovees. The ouroosc of this form is to urovide infofination which can alert the town of vossible conflicts of interest and allow it to ~ake whatever action is n to void e. (Last nan', lust name,.~aiddle initial, unless you am applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) T0x grievance Building , Variance Trustee 'L,,,"' Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If "Other', name the activity.) Do you personally (or thmngh your company, spouse, sibling, paint, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Soothold? "Rclatinaship' includes by blood, marriage, or bUSiness interest "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or cmpinymcnt by) a corporation in which the town officer or empinycc owns more than 5% of thc shares. YES NO ~ If yon answered "YES", complete thc balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Soathold Titlc Or position of that person I)cscribc the v~lationship between yourself (the applican~agent/representative) and the tewn officer or employee. Either check thc appropriate line A) through D) and/er dcscrihe in thc apace provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): __.A) the owner of,greater than 5% of thc shams of the corporate stock of the applic0n~ (when the applicant is a corporation); __.B) thc legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); __.C) an officer, director, parmcr, or employee of the applicant; or __.D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS 1 Submitt~day of~.~ ~ 20gt 0 Signatu~ ~-~"~ ~ ._ Tov~n of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail~ listing both supporting and non- suooorting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION PROJECT NAME ~,~,-~9,'~,qzO f~-'~ ~',~ ~ The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoard ~ Planning Board [~ Building Dept. [~ Board ofTrustees Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Location of action: Site acreage: ['~ d Present land use: ~' ~ ~o ~ Present zoning classification: If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: ~ ~oz~ (c) Telephone number: Area Code (). (d) Application number, if any:. Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [~No ~ If yes, which state or federal agency? ~ga ~/~ gT'~,~ C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ~Yes ~ No ~/~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes [] No Vq ot App,ieahlc Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [--] No [~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes ~ No ~-~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quali~y and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - PoliCies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes No I ~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not~plicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No ~Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of $outhold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes~ No [~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary ' ' WORKING COAST POLI~S Policy 10. Protect Southold's wa~er-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ~-] Yes ~ No [~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconie Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No It~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No 7- ot Applicable At~ach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [-~ No ~/Not Applicable PREPARED BYX~//~-~,~? ~'. /~?'Z'.,t~ TITLE ~-c~5/,a/~ DATE Jeffrey T. Butler, P.E., P.C. Architectural and Engineering Services 206 Lincoln Street Riverhead, NY 11901 Tel: (631) 208-8850 Fax: (631)727-8033 June 30, 2010 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Lauren Standish Town of Southold Board of Trustees RE: Amendment of Permit #6673A (SCTM 1000-89-3-11.5) Dear Ms. Standish, Attached please fmd~ copies of the a site plan showing a proposed amendment to the previous permit issued for trimming the phragmites on the property described above. The applicant is proposing to maintain all of the phragmites to within 12" of the ground. Please note that we have also requested a non-jurisdictional letter for the location of the proposed garage noted on the plan. Please do not hesitate to call this office with any questions. Sincerely, Enclosures I. ORAININ~ ARE NOT TO BE SCALEDi DIMENSIONS TO gOVERN. PROJECT COORDINATOR SHALL BE NOTIEIE[2 DE ANY DI~P4fPANCIE~. 2. SPECIAL CARE 5HALL BE TAKEN TO AS~ HINIHUH LINE / SYMDOL LE®ENE> PROPERTY LiNE 5ETf½ACK LiNE ®ENEP-J~L NOTES C, ONT'[P I~. gAS, ELECTRIC, SEMEP~ POP4ER, ~IATER AND OTHER SERVILE CONNECTIONS SHALL DE ~MOVDO OR SEALED IN CONPORHI~ HITH THE APPLICABLE RE~LATION5 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY THE ~IClP& ACENC~ HAVIN¢ ~RISOICTION DEMOLITION 14. POLLOH APPLIOABLE STANDARD5 IN ~OCUMENT5 AND ~BLIOATION5 OF THE POLLOHIN¢ AS~OIATION5 ACENCIES~ NATIONAL FI~E PROMOTION A5500IATION (NEM~, AHERIOAN ~TIO~ STANDARD5 INSTI~T~ (ANSI), STORM DRAINAGE CALC: (PROVIDED FOR PROPOSED 22'x~O' ~ CAR VOLUHE = AREA x RAINFALL x COEFFICIENT USE= (0 ¢'¢xD' ~EEP LEAOHIH~ POOL5 N/F LAMBDA ASSOCIATES, lNG, j HUBBARD (FOPJMALLY CARRIg McDONALD) TYPICAL STORM MATER LEAGHIN® POOL, (SD) DETAIL NOT TO ~ALE / .~'/ A ,vo.-¢' i e' o /4" &lYE FTAN TEST HOLE DATA N/F SHELBY S. BLEIFELD 60 qO 5 PROPOSEE> SITE PLAN: SITUATE AT, E~AYVIE~4, NY (TO TIE LINE) 8oo-2¢2-a4eo i w~wv,cati811 corn (for othar states) Suffolk Counties on Long Island must contact but no more than t0 working days (excluding weekends and legal holidays) prior to beginning any rn echanlzed digging or excavation work to locate requests onhne, through ITIC. If you do not calling 811, the national call before you dig responsibility-NOT the homeowner's-to c~ntact I CEDAR BEACH HARBOR ZONING INFORMATION: RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY (R-40): LOT SIZE: 40,000 SQ.FT. (1 AC) EXISTING: 52,668 SQ.Fr. (1.21 AC) PROPOSED: N/C LOT WIDTH: 150 Fl', MIN EXISTING: 13684 FT, PROPOSED: N/C LOT DEPTH: 175 Ff. MIN EXISTING: 449,38 F~ PROPOSED: N/C FRONT YARD SETBACK (PRINCIPLE): EXISTING: 76,9 FT PROPOSED: N/C 50 Fl' MIN SIDE YARD SETBACK (PRINCIPLE): 15 FT MIN EXISTING: 20,2 FT PROPOSED: N/C BOTH SIDE YARDS SETBK (PRINCIPLE): 35 ET EXISTING: 42,5 FT PROPOSEB: N/C REAR YARD SETBACK (PRINCIPLE): 50 FY MIN EXISTING: +1590.2 ET PROPOSED: N/C LIVABLE FLOOR AREA: 850 SO,F% EXISTING: 1,534,71 SQ.FT, PROPOSED: N/C LOT COVERAGE: 20% MAXIMUM (10,535,6 EXISTING: 2.34% (1,255 SQ.FT,) PROPOSED: 3,60% (1,895 SQ.FT.) BUILDING HEIGHT', EXISTING: PROPOSED: 35 FT MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES: 2Y2 MAXIMUM EXISTING: 2 STY (DWLO) PROPOSED: N/C MIN FRONT YARD SETBK (ACCESSORY/WATERFRT): 50' MIN EXISTING: 105,6 FI" (SHED) PROPOSED: 54.9 FT (GARAGE) RELIEF REQUESTED REAR/SIDE YARD SETBACKS (ACCESSORY): EXISTING: 3.,5 FT (SHED) PROPOSED: 15 FY (GARAGE) 15' MIN BUILDING AREA (ACCESSORY): 750 SO,FL EXISTING: 67,24 SQ.FT, (SHED) PROPOSED: 660 SQ.FT. (GARAGE) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT (ACCESSORY/SLOPING): EXISTING: 9,0 FT. (SHED) PROPOSED: 22.0 FY. (GARAGE) 22' MAX SITE PgETLANOS AREA SCOPE OF HORI<: I. PROPOSED HAINTENANCE OF PHRA~MITES ALONe CAT~IALK AND DOCK. 2. PROPOSED REMOVAL OF DEAD TF. EES !41THIN TRUSTEES JURISTICTIONAL A~A. 5. PROPOSED 22' X 50' OETACHE~ 2 OAR = z - ~ O z PAGE: - of l