The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5869 Office Location: �f3f soUTyolo Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank # 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 : Southold,NY 11971-0959 co http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 COVER SHEET WITH ZBA FILE STATUS OF FILE ZBA# .)o'6`T' Name : Do L-A . d 6AIA P-bgsr)L Tax Map#: n9v—. _ �— - l Location : �3 s Sh t p a vz� X11 C' C-L�-J (Z [ ] Refund issued ; CANNOT activate or reactivate file (Applicant has withdrawn application). '-6 -6 ] NO REFUND DUE, based on time spent for Town to process application and h anngs. [ ] Obsolete & expired; CANNOT reactivate this file: NEW APPLICATION NECESSARY: Extensive time has passed; Zoning Code changes are now in effect and this application expired. NOTE: Applicant may apply for a new application with Building Inspector for a new Notice of Disapproval and submit NEW application with all documents and current maps to ZBA, or modify plan to conform to the current code. This Town file based on applicant's previous year requests has expired. [ ] No forms to be scanned; FILE # VOID: APPLICATION RETURNED. (All forms were returned to applicant early in process, as requested by applicant.) ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i } J8 `n L:Tb 4- -pr. K t: ko- 11 ef- a83 ate!!mac I r�vl * �'�delc��vn—pasS Vaor. tD Nie �i l e d Pew � �� i ALL /�� n�✓ urn eF 1(n�u 3/oy w/poss� bh K4 . C/e�sPc� b� ✓L�.Sot�,�`f"1v�'1 �� ap �jFJiyevit� oCti �cta< )lt wi NQS 3P ski o 7l _�6 7. J7o,eRG E' T.vKS- l�P.d�v7 �NR1S �'c 7,BFl C/� 1� �ofEO MAILING ADDRESS: r G BOARD MEMBERS rjF SQ�r P.O_ Box 1179 *C DONALD J.WILCENSKI h��l`� y��O Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: JWILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III Ol (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDORycoul�+�� Southold, NY \� It'1 Telephone: 631 765-1938 \ www.southoldtow-nny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Via Federal Express 0� �J September 9, 2014 RECEIVED Ms. Jodi M. McDonald, Chief, Regulatory Branch SEP 10 2014 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS New York District Rm. 1937, 26 Federal Plaza Jacob K. Javits Federal Building New York, NY 10278-0090 Re: Public Notice Number: NAN-2013-01475-EYA Dear Ms. McDonald: The Town of Southold Planning Board is in receipt of the Public Notice, dated August 12, 2014, in connection with the Oki-Do Ltd. Department of the Army application and objects to its issuance at this time for the reasons set forth below: 1. In 2003, the Town of Southold Planning Board accepted a Site Plan Application to construct a holistic health center located at the southerly end of Shipyard Lane on Gardener's Bay, in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, on an 18.7-acre parcel in the MII Zone also identified as SCTM #1000-38-7-7.1. The proposed Site Plan included a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units, a main spa building along with a 185- seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed project also involved a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. Manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos and man-made water features. Additionally, and most pertinent for your review, the subject project also included the replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16-slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities. Ms. Jodi M. McDonald Page 2 September 9, 2014 2. In 2006, the Town of Southold Planning Board was established as Lead Agency for the action and, as such, conducted a coordinated review and issued a Positive Declaration. In connection with its review, the Planning Board required scoping and a Final Scope, dated November 6, 2006, was adopted (copy attached). Thereafter, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (hereinafter referred to as "DEIS")was submitted, but was found to be incomplete with respect to the aforementioned Final Scope. A letter requesting revisions to the DEIS was sent to the applicant on Nowerpber 18, 2008, and no further action was taken by the applicant for approximately five (5) years. 3. On February 26, 2013, the Planning Board issued a letter to the applicant ndicatmgithat'the application would be considered withdrawn due to inactivity, unless a letter was submitted within 60 days stating the reasons for the delay. On March 8, 2013, the applicant submitted a response to the Planning Board indicating that it was the intent of the applicant to continue with the Site Plan, however, to date, we have not received any further communication from the applicant. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Board respectfully requests that you suspend your review of the Oki-Do Ltd. permit application until the applicant completes the pending SEQRA process. The Planning Board is awaiting a DEIS it requested in 2006 and cannot continue its review until receipt. Further, it is the position of this Board that the cumulative impact analysis required by SEQR cannot be adequately satisfied if the project is segmented as defined by Part 617.2(ag), to wit "... the division of the environmental review of an action so that various activities or stages are addressed as though they were independent, unrelated activities needing individual determinations of significance': Here, the approval sought from the Army Corps is part of the "whole action" and any issuance of a Dept. of the Army permit would be premature as the full environmental impact analysis as identified by the Final Scope is incomplete. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman Enclosure Ms. Jodi M. McDonald Page 2 September 9, 2014 cc: Joseph Martens, NYS DEC Commissioner Sheri Aicher, NYS DEC, Stony Brook, NY Mark Wolfgang, NYS Department of Transportation Jennifer Street, NYS Department of State Christopher Lubicich, PE, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Kimberly Kennedy, Suffolk County Water Authority Andrew Freleng, Suffolk County Planning Commission Honorable Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Martin Finnegan, Town Attorney Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Leslie Weisman, Chairperson, Zoning Board of Appeals Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector John Bredemeyer, Chairman, Board of Trustees Michael Collins, Town Engineer Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Southold Town Architectural Review Committee MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS *QF SQ(fry P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �0� Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDSTown Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G • 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON �l Y (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �`' UM,�� Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 6, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Pian for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 6, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats,office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the Mll Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1, and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6)(i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, the Southold Planning Board adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and GAIA Holistic Circle (OKI-DO) Page Two November 6, 2006 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, that pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant agents will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2006, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 held a public scoping meeting from 4:30p-6:00pm and allowed for comments to be received at the Planning Department up to October 26, 2006; be it therefore RESOLVED, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town'of Southold as reflected in the estimate of Nelson Pope &Voorhis dated October 30, 2006, subject to modification; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 adopts the FINAL SCOPE FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT prepared by Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC dated November 6, 2006 and require that the agent address all issues. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ?edlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC-Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services Environmental Notice Bulletin Department of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw File Enc: Final Scope r11� NELSON,POPE & VOORHIS,LLC Environmental Consultant to the Planning Board ENVIRONMENTAL - PLANNING - CONSULTING Town of Southold, New York 572 WALT WHITMAN ROM,MELVILLE.NY 11747-2183 (631)427-5665 FAX(611) 427-5620 npvC3a nelsonpope.cum FINAL SCOPE FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT `GALA LIOLISTIC CIRCLE" Proposed Special Exception Permit for Transient Motel Shipyard Lane,East Marion,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Prepared for: Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 . Southold,NY 11971 (631) 765-1938 Prepared by: Nelson, Pope&Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747 (631)427-5665 Contact: Charles J.Voorhis,CEP,AICP Date: November 6,2006 1..0 Introduction This document is the Final Scope of the issues and analyses to be included in the DEIS for the proposed transient motel on a 17.325-acre parcel located at the southerly end of Shipyard Lane on Gardener's Bay, in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk known as Gaia Holistic Circle. The analysis of the Gaia Holistic Circle project in a DEIS has been required by the Town of Southold Planning Board, as Lead Agency for administration of the subdivision review and as required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA). The requirement for a DEIS was contained in a Positive Declaration issued by the Planning Board on September 11, 2006. The information prepared in conformance with this scope and the SEQRA process is intended to provide comprehensive input in the decision-making process for use by involved agencies in preparing their own findings and issuing decisions on their respective permits. The document . • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement must be concise but thorough, well documented, accurate and consistent. Figures and tables will be presented in support of the discussions and analyses contained in the document. Technical information will be summarized in the body of the DEIS and attached in their entirety in an appendix. 2.0 Brief Description of the Proposed Project The proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various.outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MI Zone located approximately 3,278 fl. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. A parking area containing 162 spaces is proposed along the length of the western property line and extending into the northwest portion of the site. A total of 27 stalls will be landbanked for future parking area expansion. The practicality and adequacy of the proposed parking lot location is not known at this time, and may vary based on the proposed site uses and duration of guest stay. Three (3) ingress/egress points are proposed along Shipyard Lane. An additional gated ingresslegress point is proposed from Cleaves Point Road along the eastern property boundary. A loading dock will be provided at the transient hotel building and will be accessible from the proposed access point located at the southwestern comer of the property. A 20-foot wide interior, gravel roadway is proposed along the northern and eastern property line to connect the parking lot area to the Cleave Point Road entrance. It is not known if the Cleave Point Road access will be utilized for emergency access only, or if this access will be utilized far through traffic and maintenance vehicles. Ornamental landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including the required minimum twenty-foot buffer of supplemental landscaping and natural vegetation maintained along the eastern and northern property perimeters and required minimum 15-foot buffer is proposed along the western property line. The proposed project also includes repairing/replacing the existing wooden bulkhead that extends along the western half of the boat basin and adding boat slips-along a new dock. This portion of the bulkhead is in fair to poor condition. The wooden bulkhead indicated on the Site Plan along the southwest property boundary fronting Gardiners Bay is dilapidated and no longer functioning. This portion of bulkhead will be replaced with a rock revetment to match that located on the adjacent Cleaves Point Village property. Information regarding NYSDEC jurisdiction and permitting is discussed in the Wetlands section below. Any dredging or removal of fill from the access channel or the boat basin will require acquisition of all the applicable Page 2 ,�: ,+or+E•��pb��uc 19V.IIgGYJI'lYfIW.R...Kw1� aor.ei..w«= • . Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement permits from the Town Board of Trustees, the Army Corps of Engineers, the NYSDEC, and the NYS Department of State (discussed in the Wetlands section below). A large manmade pond, containing a landscaped island, several recreational bridges and wooden decks are proposed in the central portion of the property. The water feature will be accessible from several different paths throughout the site and will be surrounded by Japanese Gardens and native landscaping. A drainage system of catch basins, leaching pools and piping is proposed throughout the site. A wastewater treatment facility is proposed for the northwest corner of the site. However, no sanitary calculations are provided in the plans. Additionally, a series of leaching pools and catch basins are proposed for Cleaves Point Road, in the vicinity of the proposed entrance. The proposed density and design will be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Site Histor C The subject property was improved with an oyster-processing facility circa 1964, together with three smaller detached wooden and metal buildings. One or more of these detached buildings was used for maintenance and/or repair activities, since equipped with waste oil and other oil USTs, and as a machine shop. In addition, an existing metal storage and maintenance building, likely used for boat maintenance, was completed in 1983 and East End Diesel, Inc., a diesel engine repair and remanufacturing company, occupied the southernmost building from the late 1980s to circa 1996. The oyster-processing facility ceased operations circa 1988 and the subject property is currently vacant. Single-family homes and crop fields historically surrounded the subject property. Approvals In order to develop the site as proposed, the following approvals are required: Town of Southold Board of Appeals S pec al Exception Use Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Town of Southold Hi hwa Department Road Work Permit Town of Southold Town Trustees Wetlands Permit Suffolk County Department of Health Services Article 4 Water Supply Article 6 Sewage Treatment PIant Suffolk County Water Authority Water Supply Connection NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 1. Notice of Intent—SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges During Construction Activities 2. SPDES Discharge Permit 3. Tidal Wetlands Permit 4. Mining Permit for Ponds(if ap cable) NYS Department of State A Coastal Consistenc U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit ¢ . .«? Page3 .r..CYa:.lLrucs • Caia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 3.0 Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts The following description of the potential adverse impacts of the proposed project has been taken verbatim from the Planning Board's Positive Declaration of September 11, 2006: 1. The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: • Site and architectural plan and architectural elevation drawing prepared by Butt, Otruba- O'Connor Architects, • Part I and II of the Environmental Assessment Form(EAF), • Site plan application, • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering, • Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)Report prepared by Longshore Environmental, • Site plan use diagram, • Informational letter from Butt,Otruba-O'Connor Architects, • Independent site inspection, • Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: a. Substantial adverse change in existing ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such groundwater or surface water quality, traffic, noise levels, solid waste production, leaching or drainage problems may occur. Insujjicient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. b. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The NYS Heritage Program Database Records indicates there are no known rare species or ecological communities located within the project area; however, historical and recent records indicate the presence of several threatened and endangered vascular plants and birds in the vicinity of the project site. c. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the site's location on Gardiners Bay / Orient Harbor, potential 1�.... Fe's•` ac Loc Page 4 ^FTV�f•%TK• G[J.lPal lL rlfO • • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project, particularly as it relates to water quality, harbor use and scenic resources. d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project had a preliminary evaluation in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of the project appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning. The project's consistency with the East Marion Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. shall also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological,architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. NYS OPRHP has noted that the area of the proposed project has not been comprehensively surveyed and recommended that a Phase I archeological survey be conducted unless sufficient evidence of substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in energy use. Impacts to local facilities shall be analyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site in addition to use of public.streets for site operations. h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources,or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity of use on the site, resulting in potential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation/use, water quality, noise and visual resources, as well as community character. i. The encouraging or attracting of a large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days,compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is expected that the proposed action would attract a significant number of people for more than a few days; however, proposed site uses, possible public access to site facilities like the restaurants and duration of guest stay have not been specified. j. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. MO-110�Porvlz r,10Page 5 • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement k. Changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project does propose a significant physical site alteration and the intensity of proposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. 1. Two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. 3. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. Anticipated adverse impacts do not appear to be minimized or mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. Alternatives to the proposed action that will reduce potential impacts shall be examined. 4.0 Ouranization and Overall Content of the DEIS Document The DEIS must conform with the basic content requirements as contained in 6NYCRR Part 617.9 (b)(3). The outline of the DEIS shall include the following sections: COVER SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1.1 Project Background,Need,Objectives and Benefits .1.1.1 Background and History 1.1.2 Public Need and Municipality Objectives 1.1.3 Objectives of the Project Sponsor 1.1.4 Benefits of the Project 1.2 Location and Site Conditions 1.3 Project Design and Layout 1.3.1 Overall Site Layout 1.3.2 Grading and Drainage I.3.3 Access,Road System and Parking 1.3.4 Sanitary Disposal and Water Supply 1.3.5 Site Landscaping and Lighting 1.3.6 Open Space 1.4 Construction and Operation 1.4.1 Construction 1.4.2 Operation 1.5 Permits and Approvals Required .. .^. Page 6 Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2.0 NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 2.1 Soils and Topography 2.1.1 Existing Conditions 2.1.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.1.3 Proposed Mitigation 2.2 Water Resources 2.2.1 Existing Conditions 2.2.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.2.3 Proposed Mitigation 2.3 Ecology 2.3.1 Existing Conditions 2.3.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.3.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.0 HUMAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 3.1 Transportation 3.1.1 Existing Conditions 3.1.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.1.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.2 Land and Water Use,Zoning and Plans 3.2.1 Existing Conditions 3.2.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.2.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.3 Community Facilities and Services 3.3.1 Existing Conditions 3.3.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.3.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.4 Aesthetic Resources and Community Character 3.4.1 Existing Conditions 3.4.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.4.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.5 historic and Archaeological Resources 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.5.3 Proposed Mitigation 4.0 OTHER REQUIRED SECTIONS 4.1 Construction Related Impacts 4.2 Cumulative Impacts 4.3 Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided 4.4 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources 4.5 Growth-Inducing Aspects 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 No Action Alternative 5.2 Alternative Site Designs 6.0 REFERENCES APPENDICES «w ^ .v.[a LC Page 7 Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 5.0 Extent and Quality of Information Existing and Needed As required under SEQR.A, the DEIS shall include "a statement and evaluation of potential significant adverse impacts at a level of detail that reflects the severity of the impacts and the reasonable likelihood of their occurrence". Included in this evaluation shall be reasonably related short-term and long-term impacts, with other required sections identified in the Section 6.0 of this scoping document. This section further describes the level of analysis and the type of analysis expected with respect to the key environmental impacts of the project as outlined in the Positive Declaration. Each major section is followed by a description of the extent and quality of information needed to perform the evaluation of each of the impacted resources. Description of the Proposed Project Background and History • There shall be a brief description of the site and application history; this shall include a full description of the existing and historic use of the site, dredging and site improvements, status of current use, site ownership and related background and history. • Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments related to site conditions shall be summarized and attached or excerpts attached to establish background conditions; site remediation shall be identified. Public Need and Municipality Objectives • Include justification of proposed project in terms of Town goals for site. • Public need for the project shall be discussed; indicate market study used to assess the need and viability of the facility; indicate potential for conversion of site to other use based on non-viability of facility or lack of need. • Population served by the project shall be identified. • Public access to the waterfront shall be discussed. Objectives of the Project Sponsor • The objectives of the project sponsor shall be included and discussed. • The objectives of the project sponsor shall indicate the.Gaia Holistic Circle form of treatment/lifestyle as related to site use and design. Benefits of the Project • Include a discussion of the community benefits expected to accrue from the proposed proj ect. Location and Site Conditions • Using appropriate mapping and/or tables, describe location of site, in terms adjacent/nearby significant properties,zoning and service districts, available services, etc. • The existing conditions of the site in terms of bulkheads, mean high water, mean low water, site survey, structures, vegetative cover shall be provided as an overall background of existing site conditions. • A summary of subsurface conditions and features, suspected contamination on the site and in the area proposed for development, as well as remediation initiatives. Page 8 0 • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Project Design and Layout • Overall Site Layout - include a brief description of the site and project layout; describe basis for site yield, proposed structures, services, utilities, access points, road system, drainage, marina and include a site quantities table. • Use Design/Description - address breakdown of use areas from a structural standpoint; indicate if the "patio' will be covered; describe any retail activities on site (sale items, access to public). • Architecture- the architecture, height and appearance of structures shall be identified. • LEED -Details on the LEED green building certification being sought for this project. • Regulations -ADA compliance features and FEMA Flood Plain development compliance as related to structural improvements; indicate requirements, design parameters and proposed design; indicate first floor elevations of buildings required and proposed. • Dredging - details on dredging and bulkhead project; dredge spoil, volume and quality; dredge spoil dewatering, dredge spoil disposal. • Marina and Bulkhead/Revetment - the marina installation shall be fully described including bulkheading and revetment (including cross sections,materials used,stone size, bulkhead type, backfill, etc.), dredging, piles and floats, access, function; etc.; indicate if fuel tanks will be installed anywhere on premises and who will have access. • Grading - the grading program and associated areas disturbed shall be discussed along with volumes of soil excavated, cut/filled, removed from site and maximum depths of cut/fill; fill needed for sanitary, drainage or structures shall be identified; grading for the proposed access to the managers residence shall be outlined; quantity of fill behind proposed bulkhead. • Drainage- site drainage and proposed drainage system and provide capacity and function information shall be provided along with a discussion of conformance to NYSDEC SPDES stormwater and erosion control regulations for construction and post-construction conditions; use of the lake/stream system for drainage shall be identified if intended as well as function, capacity and viability in view of depth to groundwater constraints. • Lake/Stream System - details on the lake and stream system, method of construction/lining; water supply; soil removal/re-grading, design and depth of features, make-up water and source, vector control, filtration/treatment equipment, stocking with fish and species,wildfowl control, stormwater retention qualities if applicable;vegetation and landscaping. • Access - the vehicle access points, internal roadway layout and traffic circulation shall be identified. • Parking- the adequacy of on-site parking shall be discussed; required parking as required by a breakdown of parking requirements for each sub-use shall be provided; this will establish the basis for the parking variance; the amount and adequacy of proposed parking shall be determined; use of permeable pavement shall be described in detail in terms of location and use; identify the location of loading docks and dumpster locations. • Water Supply - include a description of water supply source, infrastructure and availability, water main routing to access the site; irrigation well water supply, lake/stream "make up" water, and proposed wastewater handling and corresponding use of water supply and sanitary design flow. Page 9 Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Utilities - the sizes and locations of all utilities and services shall be described along with the status of future possible connection. • Lighting- the Town lighting requirements, proposed lighting and an illumination analysis shall be provided and described for all aspects of the project including parking areas, the restaurant and other site improvements; compliance with"dark skies"shall be identified. • Landscaping - infonnation on the type, amount and location of landscaping proposed shall be provided as well as information on maintenance requirements such as irrigation and fertilization under operation and maintenance; information on buffers around the site perimeter, retention of existing trees and other buffering techniques shall be identified; the plant list shall be reviewed and described to ensure that "invasive" species are not introduced to the site; screening of dumpsters, recreational activities and parking shall be addressed. • Amenities - describe all amenities on site including outdoor use, tennis courts, arenas, playgrounds, use of beach and limits on off-site use of facilities, etc. • Open Space Management - include a discussion on retained open space areas; areas of dedication, areas of retention by applicant; easements or restrictions to ensure retention of open space. Construction • The construction and operation/maintenance of the site shall be fully discussed. • Demolition of the existing buildings including safety and protection of neighboring properties. • Remediation based on the Phase IM ESA. • Project phasing(if applicable). • Method of construction, construction schedule/timetable, days of the week; indicate Town code restrictions of nuisance activities and compliance. • Construction management, equipment storage/staging, delivery routes, hours of operation,workers' parking,protection of natural and sensitive areas. • Protection of workers and worker safety during construction shall be evaluated. • Need to modify overhanging trees on Shipyard Lane for construction or operation. • Quantity of soil importlexport, truck routes,management and mitigation. • Dredging and bulkhead project details; staging areas; construction methods; dewatering areas; disposal areas; dredge removal truck trips; time frames for construction. - Operation • In terms of operation, describe the management and protection of open space; describe Organization management and operation; describe road, landscape and open space maintenance practice,describe any special conditions which may apply. • Detailed description identifying which of the site uses (if any) will be open to the public (i.e., the marina, restaurant, spa, etc.) and which will be exclusive for hotel guests. • Uses expected of various locations and facilities within the site; seasons of use, intcnsity of use, whether the site will be open to special events such as weddings, conferences or catering events,retail sales. • Projected number of employees required for the various uses for weekdays, weekends and seasonal peak periods. •4:• ��.�..„�, Page 10 • • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Indicate activities such as outdoor parties, placement and use of loudspeakers, concerts or special events including frequency, location time periods and schedule. • Truck sizes expected for deliveries and delivery routing, delivery times and truck unloading areas. • Location of dumpsters, truck access to dumpsters, hours of dumpster pickup shall be addressed; indicate if trash compactors will be used. • Details on internal traffic circulation plan, use of gravel road and general on-site activities. • Description of use of golf carts on site. • Valet parking shall be fully described. • Description of any generators proposed for the facility. • Description of operation of the proposed marina, users, frequency of use, etc. • Seasons of operation of various components of the facility. • Lighting operations in terms of type, hours lit and controls shall be discussed. • Snow removal shall be described as related to parking surfaces and operation. • Entity responsible for site operations. • Restrictions on Emergency Access (if proposed) and how the restrictions will be ensured. • Lake/stream system operation and maintenance; lake "make-up" water; fish stocking; wildfowl population control; nutrient influx control; mosquito/vector control;aesthetics. • Water use shall be fully described including: maximum size of vessels, turning radius, depths, vessel speeds in marina, potential for increased number of private vessels docking, channel enhancements (increased dredging potential, navigation aids), and access to existing navigation channels. • Use and management of open space areas. • Operation of the marina shall be identified; indicate if fuel storage will occur for marina patrons. Permits and Approvals Required • Identify all required permits and reviews • Indicate the filing date and status of submissions to the lead and involved agencies. Natural Environmental Resources Soils and Topography • Existing soil, subsoil and topographic conditions shall be analyzed in terms of existing conditions, proposed conditions and measures which may be employed to minimize potential significant adverse environmental impacts. • The existing soil types shall be determined pursuant to the Suffolk County Soil Survey. • Soil borings shall be described to determine subsurface soil quality and depth to groundwater. • The topography of the site shall be determined using site specific topographic surveys of the property. • The soil quality shall be described in terms of analytical results from Phase II sampling. .�tVr�..T_g.N'XK".s Page I I • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Impact to soils shall be discussed in terms of soil constraints pursuant to the Suffolk County Soil Survey based on the type of land use proposed and the constraints for each soil type. • Constraints in terms of depth to groundwater shall be evaluated by establishing that sanitary and drainage systems can function property; vertical profiles of these systems establishing minimum surface elevation, maximum groundwater elevation and system installation to required design standards shall be included. • Topographic alteration of the site shall be determined through evaluation of the grading proposed for the site and determination of resultant slopes, volume and disposition/origin of cut or fill, and proposed changes to topographic elevations; impact of fill for sanitary, drainage and buildings shall be evaluated; evaluation may include description, profiles, contour maps and/or other methods to perform effective evaluation; impact of grading for the proposed managers residence road shall be evaluated. • Mitigation in terms of soil remediation, erosion control, retention of soils, fugitive dust and related impacts shall be identified. Water Resources • The groundwater management zone as classified under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code shall be referenced. • The depth to groundwater in key development locations of the site shall be determined by use of on-site soil borings; soil borings in all areas of proposed leaching must be included given constrained site soils,fill, oyster shell, etc. • The expected direction of groundwater flow based on hydrologic interpolation shall be identified. • The existing groundwater quality shall be referenced from existing literature. • The water supply source, infrastructure and availability, service provider and capacity of systems shall be established through communication with the water district and analysis of impacts; water main routing and growth impacts must be evaluated; irrigation water, well installation and impacts must be examined. • The expected impact of the project with respect to water quality shall be fully examined in terms of sanitary discharge compliance, wastewater treatment system operation and regulatory requirements. • Applicable Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulations and requirements will be identified in terms of density and current policy on the proposed wastewater system, and the compliance of the action with same will be evaluated. • Calculations of projected sanitary flow and consistency with the Suffolk County Sanitary Code will also be provided. • The nitrogen budget for the site (considering all potential sources of nitrogen) shall be determined using mass-balance modeling methods. • Other water quality impacts related to pesticides, snow melt chemicals (if applicable), chemical storage and any other sources shall be analyzed. • The consistency of the proposed action with the findings of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook will be evaluated as related to stormwater management and discharge. • The existing stormwater management system and surface drainage conditions on the site Page 12 • • Gala Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be described. This will include, but not be Iimited to: stormwater generated, available information relative to collection and management systems, and system capacity. In addition, post-development stormwater management conditions will be evaluated. This evaluation will include: calculations of storn1water to be generated, details of the proposed collection and management systems, system capacity, future maintenance practices for stormwater collection and leaching structures and analysis of how the proposed stormwater management system will comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including the NYSDEC SPDES GP 02-01 Phase 2 stormwater regulations. • The change in hydrology of the site in terms of quantity of recharge under existing and future conditions shall be established using appropriate hydrologic analysis methods; use of the irrigation well, drawdown and potential for salt-water intrusion shall be included; drought conditions water consumption and impact to neighboring private wells; issues regarding increased water table elevations, functioning of sanitary/drainage recharge systems and potential to increase flooding in the area shall be addressed. • Constraints and impacts related to depth to groundwater must be evaluated; depth of leaching structures (sanitary and stom-water) placement to ensure minimum 2-3' above the water table,capacity and function shall be considered. • The DEIS will provide calculations of projected water consumption for each use proposed and, in consultation with the Suffolk County Water Authority, will evaluate the ability to meet this projected water demand; the evaporative loss of water from new surface water features, pond "make up" water, irrigation and all water use shall be included. • As the proposed action includes the installation of an irrigation well, the yield of the well must be provided to determine the need for a Long Island Well Permit and to evaluate the potential impacts associated therewith. • Area conditions in terms of drainage and potential for or reported flooding shall be described. • As the site is situated in Zone AE, base elevations as promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would be identified, and a consistency analysis with same would be included; the Flood Zone line shall be interpolated based on . "on-site"topography and shall align with the nine(9) foot contour. • Impact of flooding on sanitary system function, generator function, and restaurant/hotel/cottage evaculation. • Mitigation measures which may reduce potential water quality impacts shall be identified; measures to correct existing flooding and assurance that flooding will not be exacerbated shall be included; resurfacing of Shipyard Lane and installation of drainage in the Town right-of-way shall be considered as mitigation; drainage mitigation for area of Cleaves Point Road near east part of site. Ecology • Existing upland habitats shall be inventoried through an inspection of the site by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine the vegetation, wildlife, and general habitat character. An inventory of flora and fauna observed and expected will be provided in this section of the DEIS. t Page 13 Gala Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • In addition, protected native plants, plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened, special concern (or with other protective status) and significant habitat areas on or in the vicinity of the project site will be identified. • The NY Natural Heritage Program shall be contacted for site file information concerning habitats, plant and animal species. • Impact to upland habitats shall be quantified and discussed qualitatively in terms ecological impact to plants and animals. • The type, quantity and quality of wetlands present on, adjoining, or in the vicinity of the site shall be mapped and described using current site conditions and recognizing that the location of high water has moved landward; wetland jurisdiction of the Federal government, State and Town shall be established; existing biological conditions of proposed dredging areas including submerged aquatic vegetation. • The jurisdiction,regulatory framework and controls of the Federal government, State and Town shall be established. • Hydrologic systems supporting these wetlands shall be presented. • Federal and State wetland maps indicate that the proposed action would be under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the NYSDEC as well as the Town Trustees. As such, all required wetland permit applications to the ACOS, NYSDEC and Trustees must be made. Copies of all existing wetland permits would also be provided (e.g., the existing"maintenance dredge permit) and a discussion of each permit will be included. • Potential impactsto wetlands shall be evaluated in terns of maintaining or enhancing all wetlands, maintaining adequate setbacks and ensuring that the hydrology of the systems (sanitary, stormwater, erosion control, etc.) supporting wetlands is not degraded in quality or quantity. • Water use impact must be evaluated including: .marina impacts associated with installation and operation, adequacy of navigation channels and boat access to site as well as boat maneuvers within site;include assessment of available pumpout facilities. • Historical dredging of the basin and historical depth of the basin shall be documented to establish pre-existing conditions to support the proposed"maintenance"dredging; impact of dredging on vegetation and wildlife including osprey nests shall be evaluated. • Dredging and bulkhead project impacts of construction; installation/spoil removal; dewatering (odor and vector control); dredge spoil placement/disposal; dredge spoil quality (grain size, organic content, volatile/semivolatile organic compounds, metals, PCB's and related contaminants) shall be included; impact of the proposed revetment on surrounding properties shall be determined; analysis shall include physical and biological littoral processes and impact on submerged aquatic vegetation. • Setbacks required by State and Town wetland review shall be located and evaluated in terms of compliance with maintaining setbacks for disturbance/fertilized vegetation, structures and sanitary installation. • Management of the land within wetland setback areas shall be formulated to ensure conformance with the code requirements. • Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts shall be identified and method of implementation determined; details on erosion control to protect site ecology shall be included. Kiel ...;. L° ..- Page 14 • • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Human Resources Transportation • Provide a thorough analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the area's roadway system. The study shall consider future traffic associated with employees, guests, visitors, and all aspects of site operations. • Include analyses of the proposed plan and internal roadway system and a full traffic impact study assessing the proposed development's impact on the surrounding roadways. • Sight distance at site and Shipyard Lane and Route 25, road/lane width, circulation and parking shall be included in this analysis. • The Traffic Impact Study will include: collection of data regarding planned roadway improvements and other developments, field surveys and counts of existing traffic volumes, estimates of future traffic volumes, analyses of existing and future traffic volumes and identification and timing of required roadway improvements and the entity responsible for initiating those improvements. The following specific tasks will be undertaken and documented in the traffic and transportation section of the DEIS: 1. Several personal, on-site field observations to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory of the adjacent street network. 3. The hourly volume report of the NYSDOT traffic count on Main Road shall be obtained and included in the traffic study. A review of the count should be performed and the peak hours occurring on the weekday and weekend should be identified. 4. The following should be included as study intersections with turning movement counts and analysis conducted during all the time periods: • Shipyard Lane and Main Road; • Gillette Drive and Main Road; • Cleaves Point Condominium driveway and Shipyard Lane. 5. In addition to weekday AM and PM peak period counts, Saturday peak period intersection turning movement counts at the study intersections should be conducted during the afternoon and/or evening peak periods identified by review of the Main Road hourly volumes. Sunday is not typically the busiest weekend day. However, the hourly volumes should identify which day should be included in the study. 6. Hourly volumes for a seven day period should be collccted on Gillette Drive and Shipyard Lane. 7. Perform a gap study at the study intersections during the peak periods to record available gaps in traffic along Main Road. 8. The accident analysis should include a rcquest for accident records along Shipyard Lane and Gillette Drive, at both intersections with Main Road and along Main Road for an appropriate distance in either direction from each intersection. The accident records should be reviewed and tabulated. 9. The trip generation calculation should be conducted based upon each of the separate uses on the site, such as, the restaurant, marina, spa and hotel. The hours of operation, size of each facility, maximum employees during peak activity, and whether the facility is open to the public should be identified. Any credit assumed for internal trips should be supported with documentation. The data from the Hotel Land Use Code provided by ITE is not appropriate. 10. A directional distribution analysis to distribute the site-generated traffic onto the Page 15 • • Gala Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement operate the facility(housing, schools, etc.). • The DEIS will include detailed projections of service demand with supporting documentation. • The existing tax revenue of the site shall be established. • The DEIS shall consider future taxes, and if it is expected that the use will not be taxed, a determination shall be made to determine if payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) is necessary to offset potential impact to community service providers. . • The emergency services (ambulance, police and fire) which serve the site shall be identified and contacted for input with respect to continued ability to serve the site. • Changes associated with the proposed project shall be evaluated in terms of emergency service access; a practical approach shall be taken to ensure that safe and efficient emergency service vehicle access to the site can be provided to the site, • Hydrant instal lation/location and other development considerations which assist in addressing emergency services shall be included. • Mitigation for emergency service access to ensure that equipment can ingress/egress the site shall be included. !�t]� ,: T¢vfyfjl°�I M LLC Page 18 UR7.7- I{.M/W[f.fQJ4.l.TiCi aGaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Aesthetic Resources and Community Character • The importance of the site in terms of open space character in the community shall be established; the type of open space which the site represents and locations of other open space in the community shall be used in this evaluation. • The visual character of the existing site conditions shall be identified through ground and aerial photography using a key for locations of all ground photography. • The significance of visual character shall be established in terms of the viewing public and view accessibility. • Other aspects of the existing visual character in terns of vegetation, lighting, utilities, etc. shall be identified. "Dark sky"compliance shall be addressed. • Impacts of the proposed project in terms of community character and visual setting shall be determined by discussion as well as graphic methods. Locations shall be determined through analysis of significance to the viewing public, but at a minimum shall include the view of the site from Gardiners Bay. "To scale" photographic and architectural renderings are anticipated, with supporting cross-section evaluation and descriptive text to fully disclose the change of visual character of the site. • Impact of shadows of large buildings shall be evaluated. • The impact of use of fill, increase in site elevations, and visual appearance of structures will be evaluated. The significance of visual impacts will be assessed and mitigation proposed. Lighting impacts will be discussed from a visual impact perspective; the"dark sky" compliance shall be evaluated as well as the potential for a "glow or"halo" effect from parking areas, the restaurant or other site improvements shall be addressed. • The change in character and visual setting shall be determined in tenns of landscape vegetation, lighting and utilities. • Impact associated with the marina operation shall be evaluated in temis of activity, lights, noise and community land use compatibility impacts. • The existing noise environment will be evaluated in terms of ambient noise, sensitive receptors and community character. The potential noise impacts of the project will be assessed through identification of source areas, traffic circulation/volume, golf carts, car doors, backup alarms, building/grounds maintenance, restaurant, waterfall, generator use, dumpster location, trash compactors (if used) and use, proximity to receptors, distance and other attenuation, and the significance of potential noise impacts will be assessed. • Impact of special events (if proposed) shall be evaluated in terms of community character. • Impact of gas dock (if proposed) on community safety and pollution potential in consideration of the surrounding area. • Population/demographic impacts associated with the use of the site. • Measures to minimize the impact of loss of open space and change in visual character and the means for their implementation shall be provided. Historic and Archaeological Resources • The historic and archaeological resources of the site will be addressed through a determination of historic and archaeological sensitivity and preparation of a Stage IAMB Cultural Resources Assessment (CRA). The site is within an area of archaeological - �`�m.ucrrv�-.�o Page 19 - . • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement sensitivity and therefore a Stage IA/IB is required, unless significant ground disturbance is documented to the satisfaction of the OPR.HP. Any mitigation which may be needed shall be identified. 6.0 Other Required Sections In addition to the key resources identified in the Positive Declaration, SEQRA identifies other required sections for a complete DEIS as included in 6NYCRR Part 617.9 (b)(3). Mitigation measures shall be included with respect to each key impact area as noted in Section 5.0. Alternatives to be studied are identified in Section 7.0. The following Other Required Sections and evaluations shall be provided in the DEIS. • Construction Impacts (Describe the impacts related to construction demolition, construction, dredge operations, dredge spoil disposal, noise, dust, erosion and sedimentation, area receptors, applicable nuisance regulations, applicable agency oversight and safeguards, phasing of the project, staging areas, parking areas, operation areas, duration,hours, and related mitigation measures to reduce construction impacts). • Cumulative Impacts (Describe other pending or approved projects in vicinity (East Marion), determine potential for impacts due to implementation of proposed project in combination with others and discuss/analyze impacts). • Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided (Provide brief listing of those adverse environmental impacts 'described/discussed previously which are anticipated to occur, which cannot be completely mitigated). • Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources (Provide brief discussion of those natural and human resources which will be committed to and/or consumed by the proposed project). • Growth-Inducing Aspects (Provide brief discussion of those aspects of the proposed project which will or may trigger or contribute to future growth in the area). 7.0 Alternatives to be Studied SEQRA requires a description and evaluation of the range of reasonable alternatives to the action that are feasible, considering the objectives and capabilities of the project sponsor. As noted in SEQRA, "The description and evaluation of each alternative shall be at a level of detail sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of the alternatives discussed". The following alternatives and methods of evaluation are anticipated: • No Action Alterative-Alternative whereby the site remains in its current condition). • Potential Acquisition of the site. • Alternative Design(s) - Design(s) which incorporate(s) features or combinations of features to provide the following reduced impact alteratives: ➢ Alternative which conforms to LWRP. ➢ Alternative design to conform to a 75 foot impervious/structure setback from current location of wetlands and placement of the rock revetment above mean high water. :ms's t oan..c u�c Page 20 • Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ➢ Alternative parking layout to provide convenience to proposed use areas and reduce impact to neighboring residential properties (more interspersed parking). ➢ Conversely, consider an alternative to centralize parking and provide internal operations to provide access to user access to site uses in order to better locate and buffer parking and reduce off-site impacts. ➢ Alternative design to reduce impervious surface area (particularly the pool patio area) to increase indigenous landscaping and reduce stormwater, groundwater and wetlands impacts. ➢ Alternative to remove separate cottages near east property line. ➢ Alternative with reduced building mass of the large building to reduce visual impact. ➢ Reduction in site lighting design to reduce perimeter lighting, impact to Town roads and adjacent properties. ➢ Alternative building locations to ensure FEMA compliance with less use of fill. ➢ Alternative dumpster locations to reduce impact on neighboring properties. ➢ Alternative driveway configuration to consolidate two driveways into one located farther north from the Cleaves Point Condominiums. ➢ Alternative south end driveway location to avoid conflicts with public access to the road end. ➢ Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for alternate access in addition to employee access to distribute vehicle trips. Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for emergency access only. ➢ Consideration for use of the combination of Shipyard Lane and Gillette Drive as a separate ingress and egress from the site. ➢ Removal of entire length of bulkhead extending seaward of upland property. Attachments Useful in Document Preparation • Town Engineer Review Letter of August 25, 2006 • Town LWRP Coordinator Review Letter of October 25, 2006 • Department of State Review Letter of October 17, 2006 Comments,Issues and Scone Items Deemed Not Relevant • Increase in sea level due to global warming. • Eminent domain issue. This document is intended to fulfill the lead agency requirements for issuance of a Final Scope in accordance with SEQRA Part 617.8. The document assists the lead agency in evaluating the DEIS for content and adequacy for public review and assists the applicant in understanding the extent and quality of information needed to evaluate the proposed project and allow the lead agency and involved agencies to obtain the information necessary to reach an informed decision on the project. Jr'�`"noF.,.0% Page 21 Office Location: r4F$0pjMailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) * P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 G� • �� Southold,NY 1 197 1-0959 A,�Oumm Nc� http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 VIA CERTIFIED April 15, 2010 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 RE: Pending ZBA File#5397 and 5869, OKI-DO, Ltd. Dear Ms. Moore: Your application has been dormant since February 2003. The Zoning Board of Appeals is writing to inform you of their intent to close this application, unless within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this letter, you respond in writing of your intention to move forward. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. \Sincere � Vicki Toth Board Assistant Item 4 It ttae.,.�_ ■ Print your name and aocrW..._. O Addressee s0 that we can return the card to you. �Y(py��y Name) C. Date of DelNery 11 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, --- or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: y D. Is delivery address different frem Item 19 0 Yes H YES,eller delNery address below: ❑No a service type G O Certmed Mall O Express Mail 11/ 71 O Registered ❑Return Receipt for Mernhandbe O Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Dellvery4(Extra Fee) O Yes 2. Article Num' 7009 0820 0001 7819 6310 (lrensfer II PS Fore 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-WIS40 _ _ 'o IgE ggur� g~¢$ er LL 1a SENDER: SECTION ■ Complete Items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. O Aprs ■ Print your name and address on the reverse O so that we can return the card to you. a ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece, r /� or on the front if space permits. V`" D. deNery addax dMMetOom lOerrr t? 1.�{JArticle iAddressed to:��"�qp�'s (y/ �/ MYE,4,xRar deAvary address hebw: ONo / a( NY `1 G 7/ a Service TAW Carolled Mal O Bps Mm O Reglatered O Rdurn ReoNpt for MaMwidin e 0 Insured Man O C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?@ma Feej O Yes \ 2. Article Number (Transfer from sery 7009 0820 0001 7819 6327 PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595o24.11-1540 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 5, 2004 RENEWED & AMENDED: October 26, 2005 AMENDED: February 3, 2006 AMENDED: February 26, 2006 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki-Do Ltd. R + 4�� 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 MAR 8 2006 Please take notice that your application dated March 17, 2004 5-t 61 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS For permit for construction of transient motel a single family dwelling two restauran s a d a private manna at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Lot 7.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 800,624 square foot lot in the M-II District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 100-239.4, B., "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead concrete wall, riprap, or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction the proposed project will have a 48-foot setback to the existing bulkhead. In addition the proposed transient motel use and proposed restaurant uses require special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 100-121. In addition the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 100- 122 which states "No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MII District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Pursuant to bulk schedule all principal structures are limited to 35 feet in height. The architectural features listed on the most recent site plan as "arcs," measure 35.83 feet, 55 feet, and 43 feet, at their highest points, respectively. 0 0 Site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will also be required. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (10/26/5) following changes in the scope of the project. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/3/6) following changes in the scope of the project. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/26/6) following additional information submitted to the building department in reference to this application. ----Wure ------ Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA, Planning MQR8 2006 ZONING 8� -& 1 APPEq�g FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. '04- NOTICE NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL CJ DATE: July 5, 2004 RENEWED & AMENDED: October 26, 2005 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki-Do Ltd. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated March 17, 2004 For pennit for construction of transient motel a single family dwelling, a restaurant and a private marina at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Lot 7.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 800,624 square foot lot in the M-II District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 100-239.4, B., "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead concrete wall, riprap, or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction the proposed project will have a 48-foot setback to the existing bulkhead. In addition the proposed transient motel use and proposed restaurant use reauire special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 100- 121. Site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will also be required. This Notice of Disapproval was amended following changes ' e scope of the project. ---- ---- -- ----------r Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application,may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc:File, ZBA,Planning i • FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 5, 2004 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki-Do Ltd. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated March 17, 2004 For permit for construction of resort hotel/motel at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Lot 7.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this conforming lot in the M-II District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XII, Section 100-121.A., which states, "Permitted Uses." A resort hotel/motel is not a permitted use in the M-1I District. In addition,the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4, B "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, riprap, or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction, the proposed project will have a 48 foot setback to the existing bulkhead. Site plana roval from the Southold Town Planning Board will also be re uired. ^� Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA 0 0 BUTT•OTRUBA-O'CONNOR ARCHITECTS, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard, Roslyn, NY 11576 Tel. (516)625-6625 / Fax. (516)625-6629 Danita Otruba-O'Connor Edward P. Butt Uses - Separate site plan - color code uses • 1st Principal Use: Transient motel (min. 3 acres required) - Total number of units is 114: 27 in motel building and 87 detached clusters ( clusters of 3 units and 5 units) (456,000 square feet applied to motel use) (Red) Special Permit required 100-121(B)(3) Transient Motel Accessory Uses: a. Restaurant in annex center (50 seats) b. office area (dedicated for motel use) c. Accessory "personal services" (dedicated to motel) d. Swimming pool with pool house e. Maintenance &utility building f. Landscape structures • 2nd Principal Use: Restaurant—Special Permit 100-121 (B)(1) (Green) 80,000 square feet require 72 seats for public, 126 for transient motel only Accessory- Gift shop & 2 offices • 3rd Use: Private marina 100-121 (2A)/ 80,000 square feet (permitted use)(Blu) 1. Private Boat slips for restaurant and transient motel guests (not for rent) 2. basin is 60,380 square feet under water+ 19,618 upland 3. Office for marina • 4th Use: Single family residence for owner—80,000 square feet (permitted use)(Orange) 1of1 PATRICIA C.MOORE Attomey at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel: (631)765-4330 Pax:(631)765-4643 �^ September 27 , 2005 �i �){ Michael Verity �' 272005 r Building Inspector 11ui Southold Town Hall -__1 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 �yVL vr, o Re: Oki-do a/k/a Gaia Holistic Cicle Dear Mike: We respectfully request an amended notice of disapproval . The project has been modified to address your concerns and comply strictly with the code. We are submitting the enclosed drawings and list of uses in such a way which we believe clearly identifies the uses as Permitted (By Special Permit or As of Right) , and permitted accessory uses . Also the color drawing shows the location of the specific uses) The attached Zoning Use Outline provides the applicable acreage-square footage to the use. We have 4 principal uses : Transient Motel, Restaurant, Private Marina, Single Family Residence. The accessory uses are in accordance with the listed customary accessory uses in the zoning code. We hope that the enclosed documents will provide a clearer understanding of the zoning uses . Thank you for your courtesies . If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me. Ve ly yours, L4�5;12c�iaC . Moore CC : Butt-Otruba-O'Connor, Architects Dr. Hillyer COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ��' v�g LlosA oaRo pF STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING THOMAS ISLES,AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING November 16, 2006 Ms. Ruth Oliva, Chair Town of Southold ZBA 53085 Main Rd., P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Applicant: Oki-Do Zoning Action: Special Exception and Use Variance SCTM No.: 1000-38-7-7.1 S.C.P.D. File No.: SD-06-02 Dear Ms. Oliva: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above referenced application, which has been submitted,to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there is no apparent significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles, AICP Ire of Plan4ng. •�'"' r n r w P. releCP Chief Planner APF:cc G:\CCHORNY\ZONING\ZONING\WORKING\LD2005\MAY\BR04-105 APR LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H.LEE DENNISON BLDG.-4TH FLOOR P.O.BOX 6100 . (631)853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER(631(853-4044 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK —Z-,"ot) Steve Levy SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE SOIL AND WATER Thomaa J. McMahon CONSERVATION DISTRICT DISTRICT MANAGER FAX: (631)727-3160 (631)727-2315 RECE�v�Q NAoV 2 � Zoo6 October 31, 2006 r ovPEp6.5 Chairwoman Ruth Oliva G eppwD c' ZpMN Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 RE: ZBA File No. 5869(Oki-Do, Ltd) Dear Chairwoman Oliva: A site investigation was conducted at SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 on Shipyard Lane in East Marion on October 26, 2006 in response to your request for an evaluation and recommendations of the above project. No limitations were found at the site. According to the survey provided, surface elevations on site range from 0 feet at the shoreline up to 18 feet on the northwestern portion of the parcel; as per the Suffolk County Water Table Contours Map 2002,the groundwater elevation is less than 3 feet throughout the site. Therefore, there is minimal separation to groundwater. The existing wooden bulkhead along Gardiner's Bay is completely dilapidated and ineffectual; the wooden bulkhead in the marina has also deteriorated but is in better condition than the previous. The site was inspected during low tide and it was obvious that sand has accumulated in the inlet to the marina. In order to have a functioning marina that is passable by boats,the inlet will need to be dredged. The proposal by Butt-Otruba-O'Connor Architects made no mention of dredging the marina inlet or replacing the bulkheading at the marina. Although this appears to be an innovative and exciting project, it could not be fully evaluated because no final grading or drainage plan was provided. The only mention of drainage structures was stated in a correspondence from Butt-Otruba-O'Connor Architects that the parking areas"will be of permeable gravel material;" this is a viable alternative to conventional asphalt paving. It is of utmost importance that all surface water runoff be treated before it reaches Gardiner's Bay. Also, in order to protect against contamination, a minimum of 2-4 feet separation to groundwater is recommended for drainage structures such as leaching rings. Cornell Cooperative Extension Building * 423 Griffing Avenue * Riverhead, NY 11901 0 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 1q u. ti Steve Levy SUFFOLK COUNTY EXEC 2� " SOIL AND WATER Thomas J. McMahon CONSERVATION DI8TRICT q DISTRICT MANAGER FAX: (631)727-3160 (631)727-2315 Butt-Otruba-O'Connor Architects have indicated that the Cromoglass system for wastewater treatment will be utilized. This is a completely contained sequential batch reaction system. This appears to be a viable wastewater treatment system as long as nitrate levels in the effluent reach drinking water standards(10 ppm) as this site is in close proximity to both surface and ground waters. Butt-Otruba-O'Connor Architects have also indicated that the bulkhead along Gardiner's Bay will be replaced by stone riprap to match the adjoining property to the west. This type of shore protection should prove to be sufficient because fetch at the site is approximately 0.6 miles. Fetch is the distance of open water that wind blows across before reaching land. Fetch is a good indication of the potential erosion at a shoreline; greater fetch means greater erosion potential. Since this site is located on the south shore of the north fork it will be affected mainly by the winds coming out of the southeast which occur mostly in the summer and with less severity than the northwest winds in the winter. Lastly, development of this site will involve disturbance of greater than 1 acre of land, therefore it is necessary for the developer to file a NOI(Notice of Intent)before construction begins with the NYS DEC. This project falls under the regulation of the SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity(GP-02-01);under this program a SWPPP,or Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, for sediment and erosion control must be developed and implemented in order to prevent contamination of surface waters. Should you require further assistance or a more detailed review once the drainage plan and/or SWPPP is available please do not hesitate to contact this office. Best regards, 4,��4 �f� Nicole Spinelli Soil District Technician Cornell Cooperative Extension Building * 423 Griffing Avenue * Riverhead, NY 11901 l ' ,40 � zlS - Qpm (� }79 S f L MAILING ADDRESS: v PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rF soil P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE ��V`� yOIO Southold, NY 11971 / Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS w Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMONl • ,,p�� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �COUNV Southold, NY 111, Telephone: 631 765-1838 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE UTHOLD November 6, 2006 RECEIV NOV - S 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. q 51020 Main Road 5�� 1 Southold, NY 11971 ZONING goAPD 0 APPEALS Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 6, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the M I I Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1 , and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; and WHEREAS, on September 11 , 2006, the Southold Planning Board adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and GAIA Holistic Circle (OKI-DO) Page Two November 6, 2006 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, that pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant agents will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2006, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 held a public scoping meeting from 4:30p-6:00pm and allowed for comments to be received at the Planning Department up to October 26, 2006; be it therefore RESOLVED, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold as reflected in the estimate of Nelson Pope & Voorhis dated October 30, 2006, subject to modification; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 adopts the FINAL SCOPE FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT prepared by Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC dated November 6, 2006 and require that the agent address all issues. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, erlly_n_B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services Environmental Notice Bulletin Department of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw File Enc: Final Scope MD(W ` -6p ri� a') R/ MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �QF sorry 7WO P.O. Box 1179 6- JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair h Q OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS w �hc Town Hall Annex MARTIN H, SIDOR G • 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND �yCoorm Southold, NY n 11 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 12, 2006 5 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. SEP 200h 51020 Main Road 5 261 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 11, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1, and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; be it therefore � � 586 • GAZA Holistic Circle (OKI-DO) Page Two September 12, 2006 RESOLVED, on September 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has reviewed the project and prepared a determination of significance; and be it further RESOLVED, that because the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby adopts a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and be it further RESOLVED, that pursuant to Article 617.8, scoping will be required for the action; and be it further RESOLVED, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold. Enclosed is a copy of the Positive Declaration dated September 11, 2006 for your records. Additionally, as indicated above, scoping shall be required for the action. Please provide a draft scope for distribution to all involved agencies. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Please find attached a copy of Part I and II of the Full Environmental Assessment Form for your review. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, 91(_��60'_L'�� erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Enc. Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State File S_369 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Determination of Significance Notice of Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Town of Southold Planning Board Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Date: September 11,2006 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review — SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will have a significant effect on the environment. This determination provides a description of the proposed project and outlines the considerations of the Board in making this determination: Title of Action: GAIA Holistic Circle—Oki-Do East Marion,New York SEQR Status: Type 1 Location: The subject property lies in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York. The subject property consists of an 18.7± acre parcel located on the east side of Shipyard Lane, immediately west of the terminus of the Cleave Point Road right of way. The parcel contains approximately 927 feet of frontage on Shipyard Lane, 50 feet of frontage on the Cleave Point Road right of way, and approximately 920 feet of frontage along Gardiners Bay. The site is currently zoned Marine II(M-2) District. SCTM No.: 1000-38-07-7.1 • Determination of Significance • Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion,Southold Site Plan Application Brief Description of the Proposed Action: The proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MH Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. A parking area containing 162 spaces is proposed along the length of the western property line and extending into the northwest portion of the site. A total of 27 stalls will be landbanked for future parking area expansion. The practicality and adequacy of the proposed parking lot location is not known at this time, and may vary based on the proposed site uses and duration of guest stay. Three (3) ingress/egress points are proposed along Shipyard Lane. An additional gated ingress/egress point is proposed from Cleaves Point Road along the eastern property boundary. A loading dock will be provided at the transient hotel building and will be accessible from the proposed access point located at the southwestern comer of the property. A 20-foot wide interior, gravel roadway is proposed along the northern and eastern property line to connect the parking lot area to the Cleave Point Road entrance. It is not known if the Cleave Point Road access will be utilized for emergency access only, or if this access will be utilized for through traffic and maintenance vehicles. Ornamental landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including the required minimum twenty-foot buffer of supplemental landscaping and natural vegetation maintained along the eastern and northern property perimeters and required minimum 15-foot buffer is proposed along the western property line. The proposed project also includes repairing/replacing the existing wooden bulkhead that extends along the western half of the boat basin and adding boat slips along a new dock. This portion of the bulkhead is in fair to poor condition. The wooden bulkhead indicated on the Site Plan along the southwest property boundary fronting Gardiners Bay is dilapidated and no longer functioning. This portion of bulkhead will be replaced with a rock revetment to match that located on the adjacent Cleaves Point Village property. Information regarding NYSDEC jurisdiction and permitting is discussed in the Wetlands section below. Any dredging or removal of fill from the access channel or the boat basin will require acquisition of all the applicable permits from the Town Board of Trustees, the Army Corps of Engineers, the NYSDEC, and the NYS Department of State(discussed in the Wetlands section below). A large manmade pond, containing a landscaped island, several recreational bridges and wooden decks are proposed in the central portion of the property. The water feature will be accessible from several different paths throughout the site and will be surrounded by Japanese Gardens and native landscaping. A drainage system of catch basins, leaching pools and piping is proposed throughout the site. A wastewater treatment facility is proposed for the northwest comer of the site. However, no sanitary calculations are provided in the plans. Additionally, a series of leaching pools and catch basins are proposed for Cleaves Point Road, in the vicinity of the proposed entrance. The proposed density and design will be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Page 2 of 6 y • Determination of Significance • Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion,Southold Site Plan Application S- 0p 6 jj Reasons Supporting This Determination: I. The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: • Site and architectural plan and architectural elevation drawing prepared by Butt, Otruba- O'Connor Architects, • Part I and II of the Environmental Assessment Form(EAF), • Site plan application, • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering, • Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) Report prepared by Longshore Environmental, • Site plan use diagram, • Informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects, • Independent site inspection, • Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: a. Substantial adverse change in existing ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such groundwater or surface water quality, traffic, noise levels, solid waste production, leaching or drainage problems may occur. Insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. b. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The NYS Heritage Program Database Records indicates there are no known rare species or ecological communities located within the project area; however, historical and recent records indicate the presence of several threatened and endangered vascular plants and birds in the vicinity of the project site. c. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(8). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the site's location on Gardiners Bay / Orient Harbor, potential significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project,particularly as it relates to water quality, harbor use and scenic resources. Page 3 of 6 • Determination of Significance • �f0� r Gaia Holistic Circle g East Marion,Southold Site Plan Application d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project had a preliminary evaluation in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of the project appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning. The project's consistency with the East Marion Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. should also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. TIPS OPRHP has noted that the area of the proposed project has not been comprehensively surveyed and recommended that a Phase I archeological survey be conducted unless sufficient evidence of substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in energy use. Impacts to local facilities should be analyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site in addition to use ofpublic streets for site operations. h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity of use on the site, resulting in potential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation/use, water quality, noise and visual resources, as well as community character. i. The encouraging or attracting of a large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is expected that the proposed action would attract a significant number of people for more than a few days; however, proposed site uses, possible public access to site facilities like the restaurants and duration of guest stay have not been specified. j. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. k. Changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. Page 4 of 6 • Determination of Significance • S- 8(, I Gaia Holistic Circle g East Marion,Southold Site Plan Application The proposed project does propose a significant physical site alteration and the intensity of proposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. 1. Two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. 3. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. Anticipated adverse impacts do not appear to be minimized or mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. Alternatives to the proposed action that will reduce potential impacts should be examined. For Further Information Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner,NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State File Page 5 of 6 RFCEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION IM Application No. Date Filed: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: I (We) Oki-Do Ltd. , Dr. Kasuko Tatsumara Hilllygr 1 Lincoln Plaza, NY, NY (Residence, House No. and Street C/o Patricia C. Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 (Hamlet, to e, Lip Code, Telephone Number) ) hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordan a with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE 100 , SECTION 121 , SUBSECTION B ( ) & (3) for the below-described property for the followinuses and purposes (and a shown on the attached plan drawn to scale) : Transient mot el, , Restaurant s)- main restaurant and annex within complex, with permitted uses of residence and marina Attached list of uses: 114 transient motel units with accessory a. restaurant in annex center (50 seats) b. office area c. personal services d. swimming pool with pool house e. maintenance & utility building Reataurant - 72 seats for public and 126 seats for motel with accessory gift shop & offices Project to contain extensive Ornamental gardens and landscaping A. Statement of Ownership and Interest. Kasuko Tatsumara Hillyer, president is(are) the owner(s) of property known and referred to a5 1111 Shipyard Lane, East Marion ouse No. , Street, Hamlet) identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 38 , Block , Lot(s) 7.1 which is not (is) on a subdivision Map (Filed "Map of " Filed Map No. , and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The above-described property was acquired by the owner on B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: Redevelopment of property is beneficial to neighborhood and community. Delapidated Industrial use and buildings will be redeveloped with special exception and permitted uses. Emphasis of development will be gardens and tranquil setting. Complian with energy policies "LEED" green building certification. Goal of Owner is for a Unique facility with world-wide recognition. C. The property which is: the subject of this application is zoned M11 and [ ] i.s .consistcn.t with the use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith. [ ] is not consistent with the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith for thg following reason(s) : [ X] is ZkfFXA)@ft* is consistent with the zoning of the parcel and revitalization of COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) waterfront (Delapidated Industrial Buildings to be demolished and STATE OF NEW YORK) SS' • area of disturbance an rin s maintained to greatest extent practical. S or to before his J day off I'QW(A, jvp 2 , ,19 o ar u is BEM A.we of N9 ZB2 ( 2/6/86) _ waio.s:6130 New YM No,01 PE 6130635 QW", pin SuMo1M Canty )�� Commleeian ENWr Jury ig PROPERTY: OKI-DO LTD. SPECIAL EXCEPTION CRITERIA: LAW: PRESUMPTIVELY VALID...ALLOWS APPLICANT TO PUT HIS PROPERTY TO A USE WHICH THE ORDINANCE EXPRESSLY PERMITS....THE USE IS CONTEMPLATED BY THE ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO REASONABLE CONDITIONS TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING AREA 100-263 A. THAT THE USE WILL NOT PREVENT THE ORDERLY AND REASONABLE USE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR OF PROPERTIES IN ADJACENT USE DISTRICTS: The premises is located at 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold, County Tax Map#1000-038-07-7.1; The proposed Transient Motel will not prevent the ordinary and reasonable use of adjacent properties. The applicant wishes to develop a luxurious transient motel where peace and tranquility are utmost importance. The design of the gardens and ponds are an Oriental theme intended to provide privacy for the occupants of the motel and neighbors B. THAT THE USE WILL NOT PREVENT THE ORDERLY AND REASONABLE USE OF PERMITTED OR LEGALLY ESTABLISHED USES IN THE DISTRICT WHEREIN THE PROPOSED USE IS TO BE LOCATED OR ADJACENT USE DISTRICTS: The transient motel and restaurant are permitted uses, by special exception. Across from Shipyard Lane is a condominium development. Uses proposed are more desirable than commercial marine uses otherwise permitted in MR zoning. The design of the site plan is intended to minimize impact to adjacent residential development. Simultaneously with this application, the applicant has filed for site plan review and approval Additional features of the project are described on attached letter dated January 10, 2006 from Butt &Otruba-O'Connor Architects to Mr. Semon, Site Plan Reviewer. •� M s soj C. THAT THE SAFETY, THE HEALTH, THE WELFARE, THE COMFORT,THE CONVENIENCE OR THE ORDER OF THE TOWN WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED USE AND ITS LOCATION The proposed motel will be an asset to the Town of Southold, there is an increased need for motel space due to the construction of the Breaknock Hall property, and the increased tourism created by the year round wineries, fall pumpkin season, and winter Christmas Tree sales. The goal of the owner is a tranquil and peaceful setting were the units are surrounded by Japanese gardens. The project, the owner believes, will receive world wide interest. The LEED certification requires reduction in transportation impacts by providing for shuttle service from airports, bus and train transportation hubs. The guests in the motel will be provided with transportation to such commercial centers as The Village of Greenport, Wineries and other points of interest. D. THAT THE USE WILL BE IN HARMONY WITH AND PROMOTE THE GENERAL PURPOSES AND INTENT OF THIS CHAPTER The Marine H zoning permits development of the waterfront for recreational uses such as the proposed use. The subject property has been an eyesore in the community and underutilized for many years. The proposed project will rejuvenate this property, provide extensive gardens and attract visitors from around the world wishing to relax within a peaceful setting. E. THAT THE USE WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH ITS SURROUNDINGS AND WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND OF THE COMMUNITY IN GENERAL, PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TO VISIBILITY, SCALE AND OVERALL APPEARANCE The areas disturbed by existing buildings will be developed and the architects have designed unique structures in the Japanese style. The gardens and ponds are being designed by specialist in the field, using native species, as well as Japanese gardens and ponds. F. THAT ALL PROPOSED STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE FOR FIRE & POLICE PROTECTION The reuse of the property will meet or exceed building code standards. Environmental and energy efficient development is proposed. The site plan provides for emergency and police protection. The development will support the local economy and entrepreneurship for the local year round population. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS �/� For Office Use Only [Fee:$ C Filed By: Y ItFtr(A �j41 Dote Assigned/Assignment No. 3 ,3o,0lu ffice Notes: 5B1elq 2835 Shipyard Lane East Marion Parcel Location: House No. Street Hamlet 38 7 7. 1 800,624 sq. ft SCTM 1000 Section BlockLot(s) Lot Size Zone District MII I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE B ILDING INSPECTOR DATED: October 26, 2005 (La Sramfod-eal a/a/n/04, Applicant/Owner(s): Dr. Kasuko Tatsumura Hillyer Mailing 1 Lincoln Plaza, NY, NY 10023 Address: Telephone; 212-799-9711 , NOTE: If applicant is not the owner,slate if applicant Is owner's attorney,agent,architect,builder,contract vendee,etc. Authorized Representative: Patricia C. Moore Esq. Address: 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 Telephone: 765-4330 765-4643 Please specifywho you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names: 0 Applicant/Owner(s) &uthorized Representative 0 Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED March 17, 2004 FOR: 6 Building Permit. 0 Certificate of Occupancy 0 Pre-Certificate of Occupancy 0 Change of Use 0 Permit for As-BuiltConstruction Special Exception Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Setback to bulkhead Article xXI II Section 100- 239.4 Subsection B ;n Boat Basin AND 11e.cihtoFArch,{rctvroA FecA,res A7/ceec( 35 ' (/b0 —j 0202 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: CIA Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. 0 A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. 0 Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section 0 Reversal or Other A prior appeal Xhas 0 has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No._Year (S�ecrcv!LXu�ahcn ) 4" Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals �� re : Oki-Do Ltd. �� MAR Q8 2006 ZONING a 4n o �I OF,4 9Al3 Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3 (b) . The variance should be granted for the following reasons : 1 . No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. The 18 . 7 acres is presently developed with dilapidated Industrial buildings which exceed 35 feet in height . The dilapidated industrial buildings were formerly used as an Oyster Processing Factory. The Boat Basin is man made and the buildings are located at less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. The setbacks of the building to the Boat Basin will be maintained at 48 feet . The setback of the existing building to the bulkhead along the Bay is presently 54 . 9 feet (the proposed distance is 67 .42 feet- more conforming) . The DEC has recommended stone revetment along the Bay to match the design of the revetment at the Cleaves Point Condominiums . The location of the revetment is expected to be at the same location as the bulkhead, the final location will be determined by the DEC . The Motel and Restaurant building is a unique design which incorporates the circles of the holistic and Feng Shui belief (Ancient Asian culture and philosophy) . The walls are "spires" which taper towards the ski and follow the feng shui circles . The spires are critical components of the architectural design and carry throughout the building as well as the overall development of the entire site . The Zoning Ordinance at 100-230 (D) (1) Specifically provides Height Exceptions for: "spires, belfries, cupolas and domes not for human occupancy. . ." Spires is not defined in the zoning ordinance . However, "Spires" from New World Dictionary, Second Collage Edition is defined as "the top part of �CE��® •M MAR 8 2006 a pointed, tapering object or structure, as a ZONING ° L r anything that tapers to a point, as a pointed structure capping a tower or steeple . The architectural feature is a spire. The walls bisect the building at three points : The first arc (length is 304 . 5 feet) begins at 28 feet and tapers to 55 feet (average height of the wall is 41 . 5 feet) ; the second arc (length 100 ' 911 ) begins at 33 . 5 feet and tapers to 43 feet and the third arc (length 1011711 ) begins at 29 . 5 feet) and tapers to 35110" These spires are a critical design element to the building. While These arcs fit the definition of "spires" and would not require height variances, if the Board feels that a variance is necessary then the applicant respectfully request an area variance for the height of the arcs . The arcs will not be out of character with the property, the existing industrial buildings exceed 35 feet in height and the property contains an exhaust tower from the Oyster Factory which also exceeds 35 feet . 2 . The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance . The location of the Restaurant and decking is maintained to keep the setbacks away from Shipyard Lane and provide significant setbacks for parking and landscaping. Most importantly to the owner is the location of the buildings to benefit from their location along the water. The established setbacks are maintained, the property is heavily developed with industrial strength poured concrete . The owner, in their plan for redevelopment will remove these "hard structures" and incorporate natural materials and colors . The Feng Shui design of the overall property can only be achieved by developing the structures within the circles . The arcs are used as symbols (as a cupola on a church identifies the structure) for the Feng Shui design. 3 . The area variance is not substantial The setbacks were established by the existing development of the Oyster Factory. The Boat Basin is man made and used by the Oyster Factory for their fish processing operation. The proposed buildings will rehabilitate a deteriorated eyesore . The existing industrial buildings on the site exceed 35 feet . The architectural design is very carefully considered to capture the importance of the sky and water at this site . This building will attract visitors from around the world and the owner hopes will be considered among the �w M MARDOF architectural wonders of this century. The applica balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the va 4 . The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district . The proposed structures are maintaining existing setbacks and areas of disturbance . The foundations and bulkheads within the basin area are thick poured cement, these structures will be reconstructed, to the extent required, to comply with both DEC and Trustees recommendations . All development will be in compliance with environmental regulations and LEED certification. The setbacks to the wetlands along the north-east area of the property are preserved in a natural condition. The area adjacent to the Bay contains cement, bulkhead, dilapidated boats and construction material from the prior fish processing plant . The proposed plan will clean up the area, remove environmentally hazardous materials, all in compliance with DEC regulations . Moreover, great emphasis is placed on landscaping and visual treatment . The design of the building, we hope, will be of international importance . The design will be spectacular from every angle, but most unique from the waterfront . S . The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The area of development was established by the Oyster Factory. Significant disturbance was caused by the Industrial use, the proposed redevelopment of the site will return the property to a more natural condition . The architects designed with the zoning code which allows spires . The arcs bisect the building. Removal of this feature destroys the architectural integrity of the building. Two separate Architectural Review Committees have reviewed the preliminary designs and approved of it . EZONING UtIVED MR 8 2006 SO Ogg0 OF APPEALS 6 . The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant . The proposed development will be a benefit to the community and a complete revitalization of an industrial site . We respectfully request that the appeal be granted, together with any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable . i signature State of New York ) ) ss County of Suffolk ) Swo to this 3& day Hai Notary lic ' �TSY A PEiU0N8 Mye y NOMI fi eta of NewvpY IIP.01PE BI30N.98 Ctw~m&Mock camp Owu July 1 02/17/06 11:31 FAX 516 6229 Bl1TT OTRUfiA O'CUNNOR uu< APPLICANT'S PROJECT DES(rfuii''rloN MAR 8 2006 (For ZIIARefrrenee' ' Kl Apptiuxgt: Q # Date Prepared: Z D aFAPPEALS 1,r,or Di molitinn of Existing Budding Areas pieasedescribe areas being removed There are three(3) wp .sting buikJinas to be removed (112-story brick end co cre a building(44.145 SF�(2_ 2) 1/2"s?Q,rL_ _metal are three e( 565 SF)and(3)1•std metal building(2 449 SF). In addition to the buildings,there are various _structures to be removed. These stnwtures for removal include a concrete Wock�pump house,remnants of a cesspool field,hoist,boat docTcs,mova a conveyor,s e s,chsnneY an over ea p`Tipes. lI. New Cousttvetion Areas(New Dwelling or New Addifiotts/fyxtensions): Dimensians of first floor extension: New Flret Floor:28,992 SF Dinrensians of new seoottd floor: New Second Floor�22,430 SF - Dimensions of Hoar above second level' New Unenclosed Rooftop Patio:5,400 SF Haight(from finished ground to tap afridge): 42.0'to the top le S li ht. Avg height of Arc Walls:Are) and Ac3-3.75 Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor_ Rl. proposed Alterations or Interior Structural Changes without enlargemeutlextensiou (attach aua short irnecesswy)- please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BF-FORE Altwatior>,s: Number of Floors and Changes WMi Alterations: WA _ 1V. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings an your property: 36,730 SF Proposed increase of building coverage: -0.4%((33475 SF-36 730 SF)/754677S Square footage of your-lot- 754,677.0 SF(17.325 acTq_ Pi rcentage of covers9t of yor lot byubei lding area: Lot Coverage of Transient Motel Only:4_446 _ Total for All Buildings:13.5%(=101,552 SF/754,677 SF) V. purpose of New Construction Requested: Redevelopment of site. Vl_ please describe the land contours(flat,slope%,el-C.)as exist and how It relates to the difficulty In meeting the code requirement(s): WA pteasc submit seven (7)photos,labeled to show all yard areas of proposed construction after staking corners for new construction),or photos of existing building area to be altered(area of requested changes). '12002;2/200i; 112006 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING 'WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICAT N ^ %L A,A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? MAR ❑Yes �j No 8 006 B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? / ZONN �� l$Yes ❑No �p rry py p /Jv 5}t rs hills — by s �lrr G1QV no OF APPEALS C. 1) Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses? Y,?s J 2) Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this apphcation� yQS 3) Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area? _ YOS _ 4) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? lies Please confum status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: r C Stone R.�i me D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? rse Cla,+4 E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? NO (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state "none" on the above line, if applicable.) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? No If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department and describe: G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? ye-a - If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. Un k ,j� Cleoa.ver ?0%rnt Cord o. 1)t kyM4 H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel A�"aonu-cf py hf In r-f io and proposed use Ticvri5ie+et Mcjo 4 da 12eSt�-- -5---� (examples: 7ex* 1single-family; proposed: same with garage.) wCK a�eEr�t USes � sJ Authorized Signature and Date 2/05 • 5�b y� QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. Please disclose the names of the owner(s) and any other individuals (and entities) having a financial interest in the subject premises and a description of their interests: (Separate sheet may be attached. ) Dr_ uaG„kn Ta sumura Hillver Pres llki-Dn d. B. Is theT.rsubject premises listed on the real estate market for = sale or being shown to prospective buyers? { } Yes { X } No. (If Yes, please attach copy of "conditions” of sale. ) C. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? { X } Yes { } NO for landscape treatment and removal of foreighn material (oyster shells) D. 1. Are there any areas which contain wetland grasses? Yes 2. Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? p 3. Is the property bulkhJeaded between the wetlands area and the upland building areal VPE 4. If your property contains wet ands or pond areas, have You contacted the Office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? --ypG DEC & Trustees consulted and rm E. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near theits arealofe required Proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? n/a (If not applicable, state "N.A. " ) F. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences which exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? no If none exist, please state "none. " G. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? no If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department. If none, please state. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? yes If yes, please explain where or submit copies of deeds. Own a unit in Cleaves Point Condo. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel abandoned oyster factory/ and PTOpOSed llSe transient motel, restaurant, accessory uses thereto A orized /Signature and Date 3/87, 10/901k iAPPLICANT • 5,867 TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM 1 The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics xohibits conflicts of interest on the Tart of Town officers and employees The puroose. of this form is to Provide information which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same YOUR NAME: {' P ( S I t=' I A 14) & c K E, , bow— Fe YL 'r (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) 44,LLy 1: (L Tax Grievance Variance Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other If"Other", name the activity: Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation), B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP _ � Submitted this_, � d' y off - Signatu,Fe �� I Print N' � r1ZlC/ } 1dCJ//( Town of Southold MqD LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM j 82006 I0N4yti 9089 (7 A. INSTRUCTIONS Op App Fars 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies,shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C,the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program.A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered"yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law.Thus,the action should be analyzed in more detail and,if necessary,modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions.If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places:online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000-38-07-7.1 AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Dept. ❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees ❑ Zoning Board of Appeals 1 Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ❑ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: ® Type: Special permittexceation Town of Southold LWRP 1 Consistency Assessment Forth Nature and extent of action: Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s) and the construction of a transient hotel complex with 114 Guest rooms, restaurant manager's residence various accessory structures (swimming pool, meeting rooms gazebos maintenance building, etc.), refurbished boat basin/slips, creation of lake/water feature landscaping, reconstruction of existing bulkheading, dredging removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures, construction of new shoreline protection structures construction of sewage treatment facility on a 18.7115 acre site. Location of action: eastside of Shipyard Lane, north of Gardiners Bay near Cleaves Point,East Marion. Site acreage: 18.7115 acres Present land use: Abandoned/deteriorated industrial buildings, overgrown fields/second growth woods, dredged boat basin. Present zoning classification: Marine II 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a)Name of applicant: Oki-Do Ltd. c/o Patricia C.Moore Esq. (b) Mailing address: 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 119711 (c)Telephone number: 6( 31) 7654330 (d) Application number, if any: NA Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No ® If yes, which state or federal agency: Town of Southold LWRP 2 Consistency Assessment Form 5�6y DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy L Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use ofa coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects ofdevelopment. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The proposed project will remove abandoned, dereiorated buildines that are a significant impact on the community character. They will be replaced with an attractive, unioue structure and use. The existine deteriorated shoreline structures will be repaired and or replaced to provide the needed interstructure for the marine dependant uses of the facility. The proposed use is consistant with the zonine of the site,with a special permit. The project will promote the Boal of tourism to the Town of Southold and provide an end destination for persons who might not other wise visit the Town,thus providing economic benefits to the surroundine communities and commerical centers. Policy Z Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Discussion(if appropriate): The site is not identified as area of archeological sensitivity or on the National Register on the may produced by NYS Dept. Of State, Division of Coastal Resources. The site has been previously been sienificantly disturbed. The existine buildines on site are not historic and are in a state of deterioration. The inventory prepared by SPLIA for the Town does not list the site or structures. Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The existing deteriorated industial building have a sienificant detrimental visual impact on the area. The existine shoreline protection devices are also deteriorated and large amounts of debris exists alone the shoreline and site. The proposed proiect will remove the existine buildings and debris and old structures alone the shoreline. A new buildina(s) of unique and attractive design will be constructed. The shoreline will be revitalized with new protection structures, of the same design as those to the community to the west. Native plantine material will be installed adjacent to the main buildine on the western portion of the site. The eastern portion of the site, adjacent to the water, will remain in its natural state and provide a buffer to the water. The detached units will be Town of Southold LWRP 3 Consistency Assessment Fonn situated around a lake/water feature and significanly landscaped to provide and attractive setting While the proposed project will alter the existing visual setting. the chance is considered an improvement over the existing visual blight that exists on the site. Town of Southold LWRP 4 Consistency Assessment Form NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The proposed structure(s) will be constructed to meet the flood elevation for the site. The existine deteriorated shoreline protection will be removed and replaced with rip-rap that will provide protection from erosion as well as provide habitat within the stones, matchine the existing protection structures to the west. Native planting will be installed above the rip-rap to provide additional protection. The natural area on the east side of the existine boat basin will remain in its natural state. The dune veeetation in this area will provide protection to the other aspects of the project. Additional native plantings will be installed as required to colonize areas of bare earth. The deteriorated boat basin will be repaired and restored to provide a functional facility. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): A state of the art sewage treatment facilty will be installed as part of the proiect. All necessary permits will be obtained from the SCDHS for sewaee disposal. The existine deteriorated sanitary system will be removed. The site was inspected for the possibility of toxic and hazardous materials. All potential sources were removed from the site and disposed of in accordance with regulations. The existine structures, paved areas, etc. has direct discharees for runoff into the surface waters. Under the proposed project these will be removed and on site recharge will be provided. Native and low-fertilizer dependant plant species will be used in the design and landscaping to reduce nitrogen loading from the site. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function ofthe Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion (if appropriate): The site is adjacent to Gardiners Bay and contains a dredged boat basin. The existine boat basin has shoaled closed which has resulted in stagnate conditions. The proposed restoration of the boat basin will allow for tidal action within it that will improve water quality. The existine tidal wetlands on site will bo be disturbed. The sienificant amount of debris with the wetlands and shoreline areas will be removed. The proposed use of rip-rap will provide increase Town of Southold LW RP 5 Consistency Assessment Form 5�bg habitat value over the previous bulkheading along the shore line. An existing osprey nest will remain and a natural buffer of undisturbed vegetation will remain around it. The project will create a lake/water feature that is not currently on the site. No freshwater wetlands are in the area of the site, and the creation of the lake/water feature will provide additional habitat not presently avalible. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III- Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III-Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion (if appropriate): This project is being designed as a "Green Proiect" unders the LEED program, as such, a key componant will address the handling of solid waste and recycling. The removal of the existing structures on with will be a part of this program that will include but not limited to recvtine scrap metal and crushing of concrete to use in construction for the facility. As noted previously, a Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment was carried out on the site to determine if and hazardous waste was on the site. Suspect sources were investigated and properly addressed. Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 5�6y PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters,public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 38 through 46for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion (if appropriate): The proposed action will provide a facility available to the public The existing boat basin that was previous a private industrial facility. and silted in will be restored to provide for a boat basin will dock space for transient boats. Existing debris alone the shoreline will be removed. The public access at the end of Shipyard Lane will be preserved and visual impacts caused by the existing deteriorated industrial structures will be removed. Town of Southold LWRP 7 Consistency Assessment Form X69 WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The deteriorated, private industrial boat basin will be restored to provide a facility for transient boaters. The proposed transient hotel complex will provide the public with a facility adjacent to the water that is consistent with the policy standards as listed in Table 1 of the LWRP. Policy H. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The restoration of the tidal action in the boat basin will improve water quality in it. This will promote and enhance the marine resources found on the site. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Discussion(if appropriate): Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development ofenergy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): As stated previously, the project is being designed as a "Green Project" under the LEED program. The project is being designed to use various sources of alternate energy as part of its operation, as well as many energy saving devices and techiaues. *copy of Town form created on 2/11/06 Town of Southold LW RP 8 Consistency Assessment Form .. ., ` ' TV N OF Y RECORD CARD `�7 `b� s STREET g35 VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT Cal Pr4p Lila 13 ' R OWNEROsde r s C E ACR. r)415- WMOL Md W TYPE OF BUILDING a yS7c r S. \ S y % VL. Aff FARM COMM MISC. Mkt. Value ZiV LANDe P P o OTAL DATE REMARKS 6, T i r r r3 3 0 �o t o o L 6 7 0 ,, - ue„ cJesd_ z /C r +, 3 6 6 //�G 1 S,.5-0 o *saa 733 1.� o 0 9 2 42 -1- de 0,154t, rF.vw,,s 4t:, I + r4 / / 5 z P3 9 ° o dib 9144 CON I 7 q 31 e gl� z 19 m �err cc 30 ow 50 2 2 0 9� 4 14 ,,�s o (p 5-000 T 87- L I QS64p -t1- -dao Y - ARM Acre Value Per Volu '! t- yu'�--c lddFe 1 .LOA 300 C O v( X�ti O 36 Fable 2 y r d D a-e lao 3 Y Yy[/�/p `�f X196-J0 - Cood 0-446 RoC2"y'qnG��GL�kAit��. f. �odl Yrec/osu re ampland FRONTAGE ON WA TER ishland FRONTAGE ON ROAD use Plot DEPTHS (! BULKHEAD C� �LYGfclw+ - 31 , E 3 al` " '`,' , DOCK _ f- order Sas G R� 4y - yb88o 3/l q- L 11154f 55- 9/ o/ - qq/a o1 oo of : -t 0 �O �o�aL fv (*I -bb Lf j $l, I Doi oar.,'; ■■■■■■��■■■■■■■■■■■■I[r!■■■1■ �� " �CICi� e�iiCiiiri■Giii■■■■■!i al■■■■■■ ■�a\!■■■■■■■■IL�7!!�■Ifni■ ■■■■■■■ �E1��i �t��IN■■■■■■ XFndation asement Ext. Walls Interior ,dmom .. ation Room, . .. ®_� } y OWNER ST ET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT FORMER OWNE QQ � � tj l �' ' " ' ACREAGE :. X20 dTYPE OF BUILDING h e_ S. SEAS. VL. ARM COMM. IND. CB. I MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS ..� I . r F (� fT Y1 o a n, © 4 3 io d X929 Gs ABOVE ---- - ��fiYl GY 2�!.Lr✓1 I :�C.,/Tib� 6� -- _ Value r J � vQv. ro- NO _ d9' 0X IV) = /Q 00 < / 75 /j( oundation ,yi ti Bath cion —� Basement - -- t �'A� Floors ; �I;ion Ext. Walls Interior Finish ;ion L Fire Place J Heat Y3 �q' p y yY i / i �� n 5 n Porch Attic -- t Porch Rooms lst Floor Patio Rooms 2nd Floor Driveway maim } TOWN OF / -7 I- 3�� -`r SUB. LOT TOWN OF fo — 7 -s' - WNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT i 6RM6R OWNER ® ° op`� yACR.�3 OS2 w Y' S � W TYPE OF BUILDING O L . / C] f arnki Ira LQ nL s. S. EA4 ®aPQ VL 3�5� FARM COMM MICS. Mkt. Value LAND P. o� TOTAL DATE REMARKS ff 1 i I I AGE BUILDING CONDITION NORMAL BELOW ABOVE ,R� Acre Value Per Value Acre able FRONTAGE ON WATER odiand FRONTAGE ON ROAD 3dowland DEPTH ase Plot BULKHEAD of DOCK :■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■OMEN■■■■■ ■■■MOON■■,MEN■■■■■■E■■�=■■■■■■ ■■■sE■E■■■Nmom M■■■■■N■■:■■■E■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■: ■■■■■■■■■C■■■■■■■ONE ■■■■■■■■■ : , ■■■■■■■■■■ a■s■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ T- - .■■■■.■.■.■.■■■■■■NEON■■C■■■■■ ■■■■M■M■■■■■E■=..._.■..■■■■■.� ...:..........■ ON MENEM MENEMN■■...■■. ...............■■■■■......■.. : .. .■.............■ENEM ....... i I I �' oo n ewe _ 6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD _ WNEIjz3 STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT C. F S t FdRMEK OWNER N E ACR. i t i �S+ W TYPt OF BUILDING SAP,( Y "'e ES. SEAS. VL. 3 b FARM CO CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS i a 3 o i AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value Acre Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowland DEPTH �� 4 House Plot BULKHEAD t Total "'' `"' `✓ " DOCK • •' wTRIM F ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■■. ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■. .. ■■■■■■.■■■.■■■■■....■■.i.. ■ .■■■■■■...■■■■■.■■.■ ■■■■■■ .■.era■■■■ ■■■■■■■■.■■■■■. ■ ��■■■i■k��.i ■■■■■■■■■■.■�■...■■ Ireezeway ire Place eat =_ itt� E Y��EyA��g W.� V HRY4Y uYt99Y98€ °�ala.t alaanv.ex•� � � EE�� < 8E4 3S '- io �a exlemvomrw ryrypw6lo CE suw I Jill if Q'9, �� uYaY'.q • GGp'' m EREDg9 W1pF4l uta 1 r- OO m \ �G • LL. J Z 5 O I OFNEW� zz g $ Q O a_ V �\ �1m�•m� p m ,.,re.�Q I � ogg _8 1 �i i i r. .�suJ O400011, � . 1 - ,q.rc� sEATm HeAKDOWY // O 11ce lrsrulra aulw n euro // l O 111/x6@11 YORLCYERIeI Yniw tlJ Y•M — - — — — — — — — `wow•rt•� __ — C f o _/ �,-C IG U l Z r— " GROUND FLR PLAN O - Y t t owwm w.: 5' Z 33 `o Aa-1.1 Y }, i r NORTH ELEVATION ENTRANCE TI SOUTH ELEVATION - Mei C r Jfv yds v T PRIVATE . CAFETERIA DINING t• EAST �.3 Rl,J.>n.Xr3�rM1:d4�.Y!'NF:d6}dk$}Ylill '�'.: 15kP.fi�` ELEVATION PRIVATE • MARINA RAS WEST ELEVATION - PARKING LOT Butt.Otruba-o'connor Architects 03.15.06 OFN i a i r s, ! #ISN'd '�b"Ll�it w4�fssk'�' ! 5�6y 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: rv�Part 1 F Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ©A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ®B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ©C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Gaia Holistic Circle Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) e/s Shipyard Lane,East Marion,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Oki-Do Ltd.c/o Patricia Moore,Esq. Address 51020 Main Road City/PO Southold State NY Zip Code 11971 Business Telephone 1-631-765-4330 Name of Owner(if different) Oki-Do Ltd. Address One Lincoln Plaza,Apt 24E City/PO New York State NY Zip Code 10023 Business Telephone 1-212-799-9711 Description of Action: Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s)and the construction of a transient hotel complex with t 14 guest rooms, restaurant,manager's residence,various accessory structures(swimming pool,meeting rooms,gazebos,maintenance building,etc.), refurbished boat basin/slips,creation of lake/water feature,landscaping,reconstruction of existing bulkheading,dredging,removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures,construction of new shoreline protection structures,construction of sewage treatment facility on a 18.7115 acre site. Page 2 of 21 565 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:©Urban ❑✓ Industrial ❑Commercial ©Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other Abandoned industrial buildings 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 14.4 acres 9.1 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.1 acres 0.1 acres Water Surface Area 1.4 acres 2.1 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1.5 acres 1.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1.3 acres 6.3 acres Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ✓❑Well drained 100%of site ❑Moderately well drained_%of site. ❑Poorly drained _%of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes F No a. What is depth to bedrock NA (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: E10-10% 100% 1-110- 15%_% ® 15%or greater_% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes M No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes TNo g. What is the depth of the water table? 0-18 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? TYes ❑ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Eyes O No According to: F mer Consulting Group Identif each s cies: Osprey nest in southeast comer of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? OYes no No Describe: The site is located adjacent to Gardiners Bay. While portions of the site contains"dune species"in the SE portion of site,the entire been disturbed in the past. However,this SE portion of the site will remain"natural". 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? RYes ns No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ®Yes ONo The site presently contains deteriorated,abandoned industrial buildings,that visually impact the visual quality. 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: _FNA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Site is adjacent to Gardiners Bay. The site surround an unnamed dredged basin unsed in conjuction with the previous oyster processing use. The north,south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded,the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands. An inlet connects the basin to Gardiners Bay. b. Size (in acres): The basin is 1.3862 acres in size. Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? R Yes ®No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ril Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes ENo 18. Is the site located inan agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ©Yes .©No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes Li No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? F Yes ©. No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (rill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 18.7115 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 17.2 acres initially; 17.2 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.5 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing Aband. ; proposed 189 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 107 peak (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 0 0 0 Ultimately l 114rooms 0 I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 190' width; 200' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 928 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 5,363 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimedEYes RNo ©N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes ❑ No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? O Yes No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 16.1 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes FE1 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: NA months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 or 3 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2007 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 35' month 2005 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ❑No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 200' ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 100 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?❑Yes ❑No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes M No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? F]Yes ®No Type Sanitary stormwater runoff 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes M No If yes, explain: Project includes the creation of approx.0.7 acre naturalized lake/water feature on site as part of the landscaping. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ElYes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? IE Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑' Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Sta. ; location Cutchogue,Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? E]Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 5%7 e. If yes, explain: It is intended to recycle portions of the abandoned building(steel,concrete,ect.)during demolition. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ME No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Eyes R No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? MYes no 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? nYes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? n Yes n No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuels,electricity to operate facility. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ®Yes n No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board n Yes No Site Plan City, Town, Village Planning Board no Yes No Special Permits for City, Town Zoning Board no Yes ❑ No Trans.Motel&Restaurant SCDHS Site Plan City, County Health Department n Yes ❑ No Trustee's Wetlands Other Local Agencies Yes � No Other Regional Agencies ©Yes No NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands State Agencies �Yes F-1No US Army Corp Federal Agencies no Yes n No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? FYes © No If Yes, indicate decision required: © Zoning amendment ® Zoning variance © New/revision of master plan Subdivision Site plan ®' Special use permit Resource management plan ElOther Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Marine 11(M11)District 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 18.7115 acre boatyard/marina for building,storing,repairing,renting,selling or servicing boats,which may include the following as an accessory use: office for the sale of marine equipment or products,dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel,and similar uses. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? NA 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? IE Yes ®No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Multi-family and single-family residential,agricultural,abandoned industrial land uses. Zoning is R-40(1-acre single-family), RR(Resort Residential-Multi-family),M11(Marine District-site). 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/4 mile? F Yes ©No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? NA Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑ Yes El No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑S Yes ❑ No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑� Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes FMI No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Dyes ❑No Slight increase in local traffic as per Dunn Engineering Associates review(4/2005). D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Patrica Moore,Esq.for Oki-Do Date Signature Title Attorney for Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 -PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) ! In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. ! The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. ! The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ! In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions(Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO © YES E. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ❑ © 0 Yes ❑No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ® ® ❑ Yes n No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ® [:] Yes ❑No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or F-1 © ®yes F]No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or E © ❑ Yes ENO involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove 0 ❑ F Yes DNo more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e., rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ [—]Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) FE]NO ®YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ©NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑Yes Q No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of Q ❑ ❑Yes El No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ®Yes F-1 No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes Q No Reconstruction of existing bulkhead and dredging in tidal wetlands. Removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures&construction of new rip-rap shoreline stabilization structures. 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ©. NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No area. • Other impacts: © ❑Yes 0 No Project calls for the creation of a naturalized lake/water feature on site. Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity ONO F1YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ® ©Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ © ❑Yes ❑No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? ©NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ® ®Yes D No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. © E]Yes DNo • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. D DYes D No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated D D Yes D No floodway. • Other impacts: 0 D DYes 0 No Stormwater runoff will be contained/recharged on site w/subsurface structures and landscaped lake/water feature. Eliminate existing direct stormwater runoff from aband.buildings&paving. IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? -1 NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ® D ®Yes DNo given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton D D DYes D No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5lbs.per hour D D DYes DNo or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ® D DYes DNo committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of D D ❑Yes 1:1No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: D D DYes DNo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or © D DYes DNo Federal list, using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 • • 55SO 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Osprey nest in southeast comer of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? F NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ❑ ❑ ®Yes ❑No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? m NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land(includes cropland, hayfields, pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: © © ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) ❑NO ❑i YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different P7 ❑ ❑Yes E]No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑� ❑Yes ❑� No The site currently contains abandoned,deteriorated industrial building(s)&accessory uses that will be removed,which is considered to be a significant benifical impact. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ❑NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or Yes 0 No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ❑ ❑ © Yes ❑ No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? E] NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [--]Yes ❑No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? r7w NO MYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ❑. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ® ❑ ❑Yes [:]No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ® ❑ ❑Yes [:]No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [--]Yes ❑No Slight increase in local traffic,impact will not be significant as per Dunn Engineering Associates review(4/2005). IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? .❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [-]Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ❑• NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ❑. NO ❑YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hazardous substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes' ❑ ❑ [--]yes ❑No in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous,highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ❑NO MYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ❑ © ❑Yes ❑No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ©No services(e.g.schools, police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑- Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Removal of abandoned,deteriorated industrial building(s).Generation of approx 200 jobs during constr.& 100 after completion. Both considered significant benifical impacts. 20. Is there,or is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ❑• NO ❑YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 -EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. Instructions(If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance,consider: ! The probability of the impact occurring ! The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility,including permanently lost resources of value ! Whether the impact can or will be controlled ! The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from local needs and goals ! Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 r,w .r �-\� • A OF SOUTHOLD, NEW Yoe • 5g�� 'ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE NM(atnber 17. 1960 peal No. 324 Dated tlbteber 27, 1960 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARQQ OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 9reenvart sea promote, x0c, To shipyard Lane Appellant Best Marion, New Yoa'k at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Thurs., lRovemboW 10. 1960 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance. ( ) 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article........:....... Section ................ Subsection................ paragraph ................ of the Zoning, Ordinance, and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be, reversed ( ) be confirmed because 1445 T?.la. (IE.d.T,) Upon application of areenport Sea Preduets, SM., shipyard Lune, seat XariON Nero Tock, for a veriancse in accordance with the 7Ining ordinance, Article v. Becticn 909, for permission to reduce trona yard O tbaCk. Location of prfipaMe east aide Shipyard Lane, Flet )f2axiecs. NOW Tock, bounded ft*M by otereporwich, east. by B. 8. Xing. south by Day, and west by shipyard Lane. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a,JU;trticet cep ication of. the Ordinances (would) (end rodguuce undue hardship cause processing type i a is the only 001cul Aocioituiotno et tie end o8 the (b) The hardship created (is) unique and i (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the some use district because this Is the Only Industrial district in the area and it is located at at street and. (c) The varionce (does)39bi observe the.spirit of the Ordinance and (would not) aa_ gcee1989 ae#8fiti disrrsatbecause ended tothis be continued as iW6, The area bier attractively 364140e4pe4 and applicant Intends to landscape the tam as well and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance(k)be granted( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed K ) be reversed. ., dr0aagoat Sea Ptodd ta, .Zw6 is granted permission to reduce front yard bbtbedk to 12 ftv for the purpose of erecting storage tanks. 06 *Atd of Appeals has visited the plant and has carefully considered the situation and due to the mechanical Operation the tanks could not' be practically located in any other position, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Judith T: Hokau secretary FORM ZB4 r FORM NO. 3 • , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE t SOUTHOLD; N. Y. l NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No. ..Aeceasory...ta.2a0Q......................Date .........................Oc ober.....27. 19.60. To Greenpoit,Zea....Products...................... .Shi pyra rd,Zane......................................... 14n,......N.Y................................. y. PLE ,i�E. NOTICE that your application dated .........................V.QtObex......27.. 19..6Q, for permtsb colstruct .aacers axyr...tankS.....ot the premises located of C� .Gardln3 r!6--Bay............................. Street East Marion, N.Y: Mo ;j.;................. Block ...=................................. Lot .....=............................... is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds ......xRSA $ � ent,.Setb8ck from .....proporty...,,ine•.on••Styipyrar.d..Lane. ........................... ................................................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ......... Building Inspector • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW Y0• FeeR15.00� " SO APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. 324 DATE .Oatober...27s. 1960 TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1, (We) ...of ..............Sh1Ry.Ard-1ame..:............................. Name of Appellant Street and Number ......................................FiaS.t..M.ar.iOIl............................. ' ......N..Y........... HEREBY,APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NOZi09..(A.CSig.SS9ry.) DATED ............October.....27,...19.60 WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ..Qreeaport...Sea.. r.Qduaxs...Inc....................... Name of Applicant for permit of Shipyard..Iane.,.....East...Marian,...N.Y.................................................... Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY (X) permission to install accessory tanks closer than 30 ft to street (Ship Yard LAne) property line. 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY.......E/.S.....a^hipyaxd..lane......."V'...indus:trial...Aist Street Use District on Zoning Map xxxxx xxxx ................................................................... East Marion, N.Y. No. Map Lat No. 2. PROVISION (5) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article V Section 503 3, TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Low Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal fta�<(has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance andwas made in Appeal No. ................................Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (X) . A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance _ It is necessary to install takks of about loft diamiter and .26ft long for the storage of fuel oil, solvent, and processed oil to be used in connection with the new processing plant being built on the above is requested for the reason that premises. It is necessary to have these tanks redily reached by transport trailer trucks, the most practical location is in front of the building as it is planned to use the side yard for other accessory buildings, close to the machinery (Continue on other side) inside of the main building. The soil is sandy and unsuited to roadway use for heavy vehicles. Form ZB1 REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce UNDUE HARDSHIP because The s(bil in this area is very sandy and unstable, which would necissitate a lot of excavation and removal of sand and hauling in stable fill to make a suitable rodd for heavy vehicles, whereas there is already a suitable access in the 'proposed location: The. sideyard to,the south will be used for another building which will be directly connected to the equipment in the main building, for further processing of the products produced. The reduction to 12ft is requested- to give wor)Cing room around each of the necessary takns. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and Is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity ofthis�property and in this use district'becouse't ' This is an industrial district, the only one in the area, the front yard is on a dead end' street, and the public does not use the beach to any great extent. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because: This is an industrial district where there are no residences in the immediatevicinity, the premises,"•have been used as commercial property since about, 1939, having :,the- usual shell pile and accessory uses of an oyster shop and packing plant. the proposed use will not create any additional hazards or create any additional danger to the neighborhood. A,sketch of the proposed setup is attached to this appeal. Further information will be supplied to the Board upon request. STATE OF NEW YORK ) f ) ss �: ........... c) COUNTY OF ✓XY't"'IC') Signature p .. .Sworn to this.....:.....::..:..:.:. '. ;::.:.:.'......day i o'f....a.::C 19 .. .....,. Notary public :-- JUDITH•T:-EbKEN'.' . Notary Public, Stale of New York' No. 52,0364963. Suffolk County - Comm sr hn Expires March 36, 1 / COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK Walter B. Gagen, being duly sworn, says that he is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND LEGAL NOTICE TRAVELER - MATTITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news- NOTICE OF HEARING paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that Pursuant to Section.267 of the Town Law and the provisions o1 the Amend- the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been led Building Zone Ordinance of the published in said Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watch- Town of Southold,theToffolk County,New s will be held by wn otiSouthold,Boark, Public Of Appeals eaown c� man once each week for ... ;Office, Main Road, Southold, Now successively, commencing on the ;York, on November 10, 1960, oa,the ' (following appeals: - i 7;30 P. M. (E.S.T.1, upon application day of ......... . ......... Iof Jahn F. McNulty and others, Main ,Road,Laurel:New York,for a variance .in accordance with the Zoning Ordin. ............` .,l.-..C,�........ ... .................. ............... lance, Article X, Section 100DA,for per- :mtuton to divide property leaving an [area with less than required frontage. 'Location o1 property: north side �Soundvlew Avenue, Mattituck, New :York, bounded north- by Sound, east Eby Kohler Betts, south by Sounciview Sworn to before*me this day of Avenue, an west by McNulty Estate. I 7:45 P. •M.. (EB.T.),uponapplication 1 19. of Greenport Sea Products, Inc., Ship- i •.... . ......... . yard Lane, East Marlon, New York, ; for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section ' 503,, for. permission to reduce front yard setback. Location of property: east side Shipyard Lane. East .Caere- ....... .:. ... • ..lic ..�... New. York, bounded north by.Caere- it NotaryPublic : porwich, east by E. H. King, south by Bay, and west by Shipyard Lane. Any person desiring to be heard on the above applications should appear at ; the time and place above specified. DATED: October 27, 1960, By Order of i ADELE PAYNE the Southold Town Board of Appeals. Notary Public, Stare of New York t Residing in Suffolk County " No. 523041000 19'461 Commission Expires March 30, _ LAdDr bJ�f�o INL` ei Ne aTMOaN oYfT6rt <.. ' 1 .I � a¢iJGWAY FTB LD�Nc TFNk. •C 'TIF'AW I TMNk 'TArFE 74Af zl Y' j i I r V4 z I size 7, mother of two, is sho working in kitchen o elr anh- artmeTii '8T�3S�R8"'r' - low-calorie delicacies for , spFred by his book, "Lose Weip and le." Son Joshua 3 supervises. 1110Ih ..J _�I'i"Ill!i;fJWl Fish , Plant Inlay fo' r ' Provi a ��,`Foodthe ,t By Doris Herzig 51�i� s, Underfed children and pampered 'link may combined in such starchy staples, as tortillas, beans soon be nourished with high-protein fish flour to- and chili. The report, by Dr. Frederico S. Gomes, be made in Cast Marion. director of Hospital Infaitil, Mexico City, con- ry Greenport Sea Products Inc., Shipyard Lane, eluded: "From the experience obtained in this study �- Cast Marion, is now putting the finishing touches we have calculated that if a person consumes 30 to ,e _on an intricate new plant which will: chemically 40 grams;of fish flour, besides the flsual bowl of t pulverize whole fish—bead, bones, entrails and all beans, and a kilogram of tortillas, it is like having into a highly. 'nutritious and inexpensive food sup- a .diet of four 'to five eggs, 750 to 1,000 cubic d plement. centimeters of milk or 200 granrs'of meat" Although officials of the. firm hope that their Recently, Secretary of the Interior Stewart L. es product will help eliminate malnutrition in over. Udall served cookies containing fish flour at a I Populated areas and even enrioh the diet of protein- luncheon. Five of the cookies were said to provide conscious Americans, they expect animals rather 14 per cent of the animal protein needed daily than people to be the first consumers .of their fish by a6-vearold child and eight per cent of the meal. amount needed by a 154-pound man. J. Richard Nelson of Madison, Conn., president, Processors of pet foods arc among the plant's and his 28-year-old son, Richard C. Nelson of prospective customers. According to the firm's press Patchogue, manager of the plant, are hoping for dent, cats who have been permitted to sample foods approval from. the federal Food and Drug Adminis- containing non-deodorized fish flour "love it," and tration to market the product for human consump- dogs don't mind wben its flavor is disguised: in tion in the United States. Such approval, they ex- meat mixtures, plained, would also stimulate dem ind from foreign Richard C. Nelson declared that fish flour made countries. by the VioBin process differs radically from the In the meantime, the plant is being readied for conventional fish ureal now used in animal feed. the production of fish meal as an additive to animal '"We can use any .type of fish. The sea is full of foods, It is not curemtly equipped. to deodorize 'industrial' fish—sea robins, hake or eels--that have the flour for human consumption. But, the younger no particular market value and that can be caught Nelson said, "We have most of the equipment. It in some abundance. would take maybe a month or two to 'put it in." The flour-making process takes the raw fish in He said that.the plant would start operation in conveyers on a continuous roller-master ride tip to t about a month and would,be the second of its kind the 35-foot ceiling and down again, through wrions in the.country. "We are a licensee of the Viollin grinders and cookers and finally-through'a hammer Corp. of-Monticello, Ill., a pharmaceutical firm that ,mill,- from which it emerges as -a sod-coloted has been working on this process a good many powder. The company plans to pack it in 100- years. It has a pilot plant in New Bedford (Mass.),' pound bags and to sell it for approximately $150 the manager said. to $180 a ton. "Deodorized fish flour," he explained, "Has little "Our ultimate aim is to deodorize it and sell it taste." He pointed to a report of studies made. in for export and feed the undernourished people of Mexico; where amounts up to 10 per cent had been the world.". ' 53 • 0 GREENPORT SEA PRODUCTS, INC. SHIPYARD LANE EAST MARION, NEW YORK October 27, 1960 Town of Southold —Building Dept. Southold, New York Gentlemen: We are .in the process of constructing a plant at the foot of Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York. It is neces- sary for us to place six tanks of approximately 261x1O' each for the storage of fuel oil, fish oil, and solvent.. Our pro- posal is to place the tanks side by side in front of our building. ( see attached drawing ) . This would leave 12 feet between our property line and tank.# 6. We wish to obtain permission from the building dept. to. have the set back limit reduced to 12 feet in this case'. Our reasons for this are as follows: 1 . Easy access for tank 'trucks 2� This is the only practical place for these tanks as the space south of the building to the bay is .. expected to be used for expansion of the plant. 3) Tanks # 5 and .# 6 will be used for non inflamable and non volital fish oil. 4) We are at the extreme end of the street. We hope that you will .grant.permission for this proposal. Very truly yours, Greenport Sea Products, Inc. Richard C. Nelson, Asst. Secretary ..L. G, Ir SAS( jiGAL NOT=CH Notice of Hearing I �1 t Pursuant-to Section 267 of,the Town Law and the g ovisions ; of the Amended Building Zone ordinance of. the Town of Southold, + Suffolk County, New York, public hearings wilt be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, at the Town tl. I j Clerk Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, on november 10. i 1960, on the following appealse 7:30 P.M. (X.S.T. )., upon application'of John F. McNulty and others, Main Road, Laurel, New York, For a variance in ; i. li accordance with the Boning ordinance, Article X, Sectionl000A. �I for permission to divide property leaving an area with 1088 €) than required frontage. Location of property% north side II I Soundview Avenue, Mattituek, New York, bounded north by Sound, east by Kohler.Betts, south by Soundview Avenue, and wast by McNulty Estate. i5 7045 P.M. mr..T. ), upon application.of Gr0013port Bea ! products, Inc., Shipyard Lane, .East Marion, New York, for a ! �I 'variance in accordance-with the ,Zoning Ordinance, Article V, 44 Section 503, for permission to reduce !tont pard setback. j +' !I Location of property: east aide Shipyard Lane, East Marion, M New York, bounded north.by Czereporwich, east by B. 8. King, 4; .I south by Bay, and west by Shipyard Lane. ,I. �F h f+ ` Page 2 - Lew 1109e, Notice of HearhT) • v Any person desiring to be heard on the above applications ! "� f Should appear at the time and place above specified. [r Ji DATEW October 27, 1960, By Order,of the j Southold Tam Board of Appeals. ' �1 tl x i PLSASS y08LISH,ctQcE,:.NOVEMBER 3. 1960'. 'AND FORWARD THREE , f ' #i (3) AFFIDAVITS OF. PUBLICATION TO TSE BOARD OF .APPEAL®, TOWN li CLERK OFFICE MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NBN YORK. ;r ia w • 'i k Copies mailed to the following On October 28, 1960v I The Lonq Island Travelor-Mattituck Watchman s . John P. McNulty i V, Greenport Sea Products, Inc. . o f �Ij { SOMEONE SHOULD APPEAR AT THE SHARING w i �I r P' V i C I P , . ................ ..... J 1 f p { l i i ii'r;9ti"9i�I ttil Y � � r a 111 f . was � 6 a d � � ac { S � PATRICIA C. MOORE Attomey at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631)765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 16, 2006 BY HAND Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeal 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-07-7.1 Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the following for the above referenced matter: 1. Seven color elevation drawings If you have any questions,or need anything else,please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you. Very truly ours, 13.atricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. 0 • pF SO!/Tyol. ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE O Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK # P.O. Box 1179 C/) �c Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS � Q MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax (631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER Oli�' ` Telephone(631) 765-1500 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER coon, southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: March 9, 2006 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 5869 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 5869 of Oki-Do Ltd. (Dr. Kasuko Tatsumara Hill er) - the Application to the Southold Town Board of Appeals. Also enclosed are (2) Questionnaires For Filing With Your Z.B.A. Application, Applicant's Project Description, (2) Applicant Transactional Disclosure Forms, (4) Town Of Southold Property Record Cards, an Application For Special Exception, an Authorization Letter from the applicant giving Patricia C. Moore authorization to act as his agent, an LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, a Full Environmental Assessment Form, a Notice of Disapproval, Transient Motel- Ground, Second, and Third Floor Plans, Five Sleeping Units- Ground and Second Floor Plans, Five Sleeping Units- Roof Plan and Exterior Elevations, Three Sleeping Units- Ground Floor Plan, Roof Plan, and Exterior Elevations, Transient Motel Annex- Ground Floor Plan, Roof Plan, and Exterior Elevations, Pool House- Ground Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, Maintenance- Ground Floor Plan, Maintenance & Utility Building- Exterior Elevations. ZBA TO TOWN CLERK CHECK TRANSMITTAL SHEET (Filing of Application and Check for Processing) DATE: 03/09/06 ZBA# NAME CHECK # AMOUNT TC DATE STAMP BOOCOCK, Estate of 11905 $150.00 5868 GLENN WINNETT Add'I fee (Stephen Ham) due Patricia C. Moore (foil request-copies 5347 $7.75 made) RECl�f 5869 Oki-Do (Patricia C. 5346 $600.00 Moore ) _ ky , 5870 Kennedy, Sheila R. 11891 $400.00 (Stephen Ham) 11904 $200.00 TOTAL $1,357.75 Thank you. RECEIVED MAR 8 2006 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VC)�� • Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 03/09/06 Receipt#: 5346 Transactiorl Reference Subtotal 1 1 Application Fees 5869 $600.00 Check#: 5346 Total Paid: $600.00 Name: Oki-do, Ltd Dr. Kasuko Tatsumura Hillyer 1 Lincoln Plaza Ny, NY 10023 Clerk ID: MICHELLE Internal ID:5869 • 631 765 4043; JUN 18-0111p:04; ;.AuV e; , AUTHOM7A.TION LETTER New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40-SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Att : Regulatory Permits OWNER: OKI-DO LTD. name : Dr. Kazuko Tatsumura Hillyer Ph.D, President: address: 1 Lincoln Plaza, opt . 24E New York, NY 10023 telephone number:212-799-9711 PROPERTY: 2835 Shipyard Lane, Past Marion SCTM#: 1000-36-07-7 . 1 AGENT: name: Patricia C. Moore Esq. address: 51020 Ma.i.n. Road , Southold Ny 11971 telephone number : 631-765-1330 Dear Sir or Madam; I Dr . Kazuko Tatsumura Hillyer Ph.D authorize my attorney, Patricia C . Moore as my agent for all submissions to the DEC, Southold Town. Trustees, and any other agency having jurisdiction regarding the property. Very truly yours Dr Ka 'kc Tatsumura Hillyer Ph.D d 0 0 BUTT•OTRUBA-O'CONNOR ARCHITECTS,AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard, Roslyn, NY 11576 Tel. (516) 625-6625 Fax (516) 625-6629 10 January 2006 Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex PO Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re:Gaia Holistic Circle Dear Mr. Semon: It is our pleasure to submit to you our application for the above referenced project. I would like to take this opportunity to tell you some additional information about the project that would not be indicated on the drawings at this time. As you are aware, the site is located on Gardiners Bay in East Marion. The 18.7-acre site features a 1000-foot shoreline along with an existing dredged marina basin. Currently several abandoned and dilapidated structures exist on the site. The overall site was used for commercial purposes and much of the land damaged. Our intention for the buildings and the site is to seek LEED green building certification. Upon completion,the project will rank among the most exceptional eco-friendly designs in the country. The project is currently registered with the USGBC under our firm. LEED certification provides a complete framework for assessing building performance, site usage and meeting sustainability goals. It not only addresses energy usage and efficiency but, restoration of the land and shoreline, sustainable site development, use of local materials and resources in the project, recycling,pollutants, water savings, materials selection and indoor environmental quality. Some of the items, which will be required and implemented for this project, are the following: • Alternative transportation: Two commuter shuttle vans will be provided for pickup of people coming to the site via public transportation. Therefore parking capacity has been sized not to exceed the minimum local zoning requirements. Some of the minimum will be land banked. • Bike storage racks are also provided to encourage non-invasive travel. • All parking on the site will be by valet only. Once a person arrives, they are encouraged not to use their car. • The parking areas themselves will be of permeable gravel material which will allow the natural absorption of surface waters,not add any runoff pollutants to the soil, reduce heat islands. i SD • Electric carts will be used on site for getting around, but walking is preferred. • under developing the site, • The current site was abused as an industrial site. We will be restoring the land by adding water features, creating lovely Japanese gardens and adding landscaping. • We will keep as many existing trees as possible and all new landscaping will be indigenous and water efficient. • The shoreline and a large wetlands area will be kept natural and maintained. • The existing bulkhead along the bay will be replaced with a more natural stone rip- wrap to match the adjoining property. • The new building will be constructed in the location of the existing factory so as not to disturb more of the site than is necessary. • A state of the art septic system called Kromoglass will be used. In essence it puts potable water back into the site. • The majority of materials used will be local. • The materials and design style will blend with the site. Soft curves,natural colors. • All pathways inside the site will be natural materials. • Energy efficiency is addressed by means of solar hot water and rooftop gardens. The entire energy usage for the site will be considered renewable energy. • Recycling will occur. • Light pollution is kept to a minimum. Low level lighting will be used along to paths and parking areas. • Water saving fixtures in the units. • Reduction of all cfc-based refrigerants is implemented in the new hvac systems. Our direction is to provide a site in which the harmony of the buildings and the landscape reflects and restores a natural equilibrium. The client's objective is to reduce, recycle and return to the earth what is taken. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, 4E T17t-� -- Edward P. Butt Danita Otruba-O'Connor Principal Principal 0 58�� 100-121. Use regulations. hi the MH District,no building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any uses except the following [one(1)use per eighty thousand(80,000) square feet of land above mean high water,unless otherwise specified]: A. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses permitted under Subsection A(1) hereof, are subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) One(1)one-family detached dwelling per single and separate lot of record in existence as of the date of adoption of this Article. (2) Mannas for the docking, mooring and accommodation of recreational or commercial boats, including the sale of fuel and oil primarily for the use of boats accommodated in such manna. (3) Boat docks, slips, piers or wharves for charter boats carrying passengers on excursions, pleasure or fishing trips or for vessels engaged in fishery or shellfishery. (4) Beach clubs,yacht clubs or boat clubs, including uses accessory to them, such as swimming pools, tennis courts and racquetball facilities. (5) Boatyards for building, storing, repairing, renting, selling or servicing boats,which may include the following as an accessory use: office for the sale of marine equipment or products, dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel and,where pumpout stations are provided,rest room and laundry facilities to serve overnight patrons. (6) Mariculture or aquaculture operations or research and development. (7) Boat and marine engine repair and sales and display, yacht brokers or marine insurance brokers. (8) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, school districts, park districts and fire districts. (9) Retail sale or rental of fishing, diving or bathing supplies and equipment if accessory to a marina or boatyard or ship's loft or chandlery. B. Uses permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter provided, subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) Restaurants, excluding outdoor counter service, drive-ins or curb-service establishments. Such prohibition shall not prevent service at tables on a covered or uncovered terrace or porch incidental to a restaurant. (2) Ferry terminals. (3) Transient hotels or motels, subject to the following conditions: (a) The minimum area for such use shall be not less than three (3) acres. (b) The number of guest rooms permitted in the hotel or motel shall be determined by the proportion of the site utilized for such use and the availability of public water and sewer. The maximum number of guest units shall be one (1) unit per four thousand (4,000) square feet of land with public water and sewer. (4) Fish processing plants. (5) Fish markets, which may include a combination of wholesale and retail sale of finfish and shellfish. (6) Museums with a nautical theme or art galleries. C. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for residential accessory uses and signs,which are governed by Article XX, are subject to site plan review: (1) Accessory uses as set forth in and regulated by§ 100-31C(1)through(7) of the Agricultural- Conservation District, and subject to the conditions of§ 100-33 thereof EN § 100-122. Bulk, area and parking regulations. No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MH District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full.EN Printed 1-7-04/lk 40 PATRICIA C . MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretary March 1, 2006 RECEIVED Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals MAR S 2006 Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman 5�f-A+ Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Southold, NY 11971 Re : Oki-Do ltd. 1000-39-7-7 . 1 Dear Chairman and Board members : Since the last submission in 2005 the project has been revised to incorporate comments received by other agencies and Town Departments . In accordance with an updated Notice of Disapproval last amended February 26, 2006 , the enclosed documents are submitted in support of our applications . Please replace the previous submission with the enclosed original and six copies of the following: 1 . Application for Special Exception, January 10 , 2006 letter from Butt-Otruba-O' Connor, Project Architects which further describes the project, Questionnaire, and Transactional Disclosure Form. 2 . Application for variances, Transactional disclosure, Questionnaire, Project description, Long EAF also submitted to Planning Board, LWRP, and Site plan 3 . A site plan application is before the Southold Town Planning Board Thank you for your anticipated cooperation, if you need any other information please do riot hesitate to contact me . Very tr y yours, —�A�a C. Moore PCM/mr Encls . PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road ECEIVE . � .7/ Southold, New York 11971 MAR 1 5 2006 Tel: (631) 765-4330 {� Fax: (631) 765-46430 1 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 14 , 2006 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re : Oki-Do ltd. 1000-39-7-7 . 1 Dear Chairman and Board members : At your request we prepared the Southold Trustees application in order to coordinate the recommendations of Trustees early into the project . However, the Trustees application required adding more detail with respect to the Marine structures and making revisions to the site plan. For your convenience attached to this letter is a list of activities which are within the Trustees' s jurisdiction and will be reviewed by them. Greater engineering detail of the bulkhead, Stone Revetment and dredging was required on the site plan. we are providing you with the most recent site plan which incorporates all the wetland issues . Please replace the previously submitted site plan with the enclosed seven prints of the site plan last dated 3-10-06 which includes the bulkhead, revetment, and dredging information. The structures reviewed by the building department have not changed. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me . Very tr� yours, 6 tricia C . Moore cc: Butt Otruba-O' Connor, Architects ti GAIA project 1. Demolition of existing buildings within 100 feet of deteriorated bulkhead 2. Replacement of bulkhead with Stone Revetment(DEC recommendation) design to match adjacent Cleaves Point Condo 3. Construction of Motel and Restaurant within disturbed area (67.42 of property line/existing bulkhead) Existing Building within 54.9 feet of property line/bulkhead 4. Restaurant Annex and units within 100 feet of wetlands adjacent to Boat Basin 5. Repair/replace existing steel bulkhead in Boat Basin, as required with timber or vinyl bulkhead 6. Vegetation along adjacent area landward to Revetment to be planted 7. Maintenance Dredging of Boat Basin (2,500 c.y.) 8. Creation of man made water feature 9. Underground Drainage structures 10. Parking area within 100 feet of Bay 11. Removing sanitary system, garbage (deteriorated vessels) and cement debris adjacent to bulkhead 12. Normal construction activity associated with redevelopment of site within 100 feet of wetland All activity in accordance with approved site plan. P"-')3tCj TX-ScP')Viio►J APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �tv soo�ti • Mailing Address: Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman y> Olo Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. Office Location: Michael A. Simon Town Annex/Fast Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman ' NV 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 •Fax(631) 765-9064 October 12, 2006 Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District 423 Griffing Avenue, Suite 110 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 5869 (Oki-Do, Ltd.) Gentlemen: We have an application for an extensive project adjacent to Gardiner's Bay in Greenport, NY, and shown on the enclosed site map. A copy of the area map is also attached for your use and reference. May we ask for your assistance in an evaluation and recommendations for this proposal. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, RUTH D. OLIVA By: APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS • OF Soar Mailing Address: Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman �� yO�O Southold Town Hall ,�r, 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P. Goehringer * T Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. w �c Office Location: Michael A. Simon Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman OIy'UUN '�` 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809•Fax (631)765-9064 October 12, 2006 Mr. Thomas Isles, Director Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Mr. Isles: Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: Appl. No. 5869 (Oki-Do, Ltd.) Action Requested: Special Exception and Use Variances Within 500 feet of: ( ) State or County Road ( X ) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman By: Enclosures APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS • �r4f Sop d • Mailing Address: Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman y> T QlO Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P. Goehringer # # Southold, NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. u+ Office Location: Michael A. SimonQ Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman lyC�� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765-1809•Fax(631) 765-9064 October 12, 2006 Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 5869 (Oki-Do Ltd.) Dear Mark: We have received an application for the above-referenced project on Gardiner's Bay. Enclosed is a copy of the application forms, LWRP form and tax map. Site map and project drawings are available in our office for your reference. May we ask for your assistance in an evaluation and recommendations for this proposal. Thank you. Very truly yours, RUTH D. OLIVA By: Town of Southold 51�(09 lop Notice of Public Scoping Meeting GAIAHolis ' Oki-Do Ltd. MEETING DATE: Monday, October 16, 2006 at 4:30 P.M. LOCATION: Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road,Southold, 11971 The Town of Southold Planning Board, as Lead Agency pursuant to Part 617 of the State regulations for Article 8,the State Environmental QualityReview(SEAR) Act of the Environmental Conservation Law, has scheduled a public meeting for the purpose of determining the scope of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to be prepared for the proposed action described in this notice. The Town of Southold Planning Board has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and has issued a SEAR Positive Declaration requiring the applicant to prepare a DEIS. APPLICANT: GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion SCI'M# : 1000-38-7-7.1 STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS/APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT: State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NYS DEC) 401 Water Quality Certification (NYS DEC) Excavation and Development Permit (Town of Southold) Building Permits (Town of Southold) Site Plan Approval (Town of Southold) Site Soil Monitoring and Management Plan (SCDHS &DEC) Copies of this Notice Sent to: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC- Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell,Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry,LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner,NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State File PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms &9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats,72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space,retail gift shop,27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. Page Two October 10, 2006 guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utilitybuilding, a sanitarywaste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin,and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM N 1000-38-7-7.1 PROJECT LOCATION: The subject property lies in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County-of Suffolk,New York. The subject property consists of an 18.7± acre parcel located on the east side of Shipyard Lane,immediately west of the terminus of the Cleave Point Road right of way. The parcel contains approximately 927 feet of frontage on Shipyard Lane, 50 feet of frontage on the Cleave Point Road right of way, and approximately 920 feet of frontage along Gardiners Bay. The site is currently zoned Marine II (M-2) District. MEETING PURPOSE: The purpose of"scoping"is to focus the DEIS on potentially significant adverse impacts and to eliminate consideration of those impacts that are irrelevant or non-significant. Some environmental impacts to be considered for evaluation in the DEIS are identified in the Department's Positive Declaration and in the project Sponsor's (Patricia Moore, Esq.) Draft Scoping Document. Scoping will help to ensure that this DEIS is a comprehensive,accurate and complete document, adequate for public review and which properly evaluates the environmental impacts that may occur if the proposed landfill expansion is approved. PUBLIC MEETING: The public scoping session will be held on Monday, October 16,2006 at 4:30 P.M., at the Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold,NY 11971. Statements from local government officials, legislators,interested and involved agencies, and the public will be heard after a Planning Board Chair Statement is read into the record and the applicant gives a brief presentation detailing the proposed project. A stenographic record of the meeting will be prepared.Written statements will also be accepted until October 26, 2006 at the Town of Southold Planning Board office address at the end of this notice. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION: The application file may be reviewed by appointment at the Town of Southold Planning Board Department. In addition,the applicant has provided a Draft Scoping Document containing a summary of the SEQR process,including scoping,the project proposal and some potential environmental impacts. The applicant's Draft Scoping Document has not been approved bythe Town of Southold Planning Board. It is being presented at this time for public review and comment. Copies of this Draft Scoping Document have been mailed to involved and interested agencies. In addition,the document maybe reviewed at the Town of Southold Planning Board, 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 and Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,NY 11971. Anyone who plans to participate in the scoping meeting by providing comment is urged to review a copy of this document prior to the meeting. The scoping meeting location is reasonably accessible to persons with a mobilityimpairment. Interpreter services will also be made available to deaf persons, at no charge,upon written request to the Contact Person named at the end of this notice,within one week prior to the meeting, 0 GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. Page Three October 10, 2006 pursuant to Section 202(1) of the State Administrative Procedures Act. All persons having an interest in this project are urged to attend or be represented either individually or collectively. NOTICE DATE: October 10, 2006 CONTACT PERSON: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone: 631-765-1938 rl[T t Q 200h rl( T i 11 2GCh DRAFT SCOPE 5 gC� FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT "GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE" PROPOSED SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR TRANSIENT MOTEL SHIPYARD LANE, EAST MARION, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Overview This document is a Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS") for a proposed transient motel on a 17.325-acre parcel located at the southerly end of Shipyard Lane on Gardener's Bay, in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The proposed action includes the construction of a 114-room motel in 24 buildings, with a related restaurant, a pool, personal services facilities, a private marina with 16 boat slips, maintenance and utility building, and a manager's residence. The proposed motel property would be aesthetically improved with a man-made lake, Japanese gardens and native landscaping. To ensure that the DEIS will address all significant issues, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, as lead agency, has elected to conduct formal scoping pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.8. As such, the applicant is required to prepare and submit this Draft Scope to the lead agency which provides a description of the proposed action and the applicants' proposed content for the DEIS. Thus, this Draft Scope has been prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.8 and sets forth the following: • Brief description of the proposed action; • Potentially significant adverse impacts; • Extent and quality of information needed to adequately address potentially significant adverse impacts; • Initial identification of mitigation measures; and • Reasonable alternatives to be considered. 1 • • Description of the Proposed Action The proposed action includes the construction of a 114-unit motel. The location of units will vary by building type, including a transient motel building with 27 units, nine buildings containing five units each, and 13 buildings containing three units each. The total building area dedicated to motel units is 85,874± square feet. The proposed development also includes a 3,834±-square-foot restaurant, a 1,987±-square-foot manager's residence, and a 1,373±-square- foot pool house with a swimming pool. On-site parking consisting of 189 spaces, including 27 landbanked spaces, will be constructed to accommodate guests and employees. A private marina with 16 boat slips is also proposed. In order to facilitate development the action will require the demolition and disposal of approximately 35,165 square feet of existing structures (the old oyster processing plant); material will be recycled as appropriate. Debris and old bulkhead (approximately 456 linear feet) will be removed along Gardener's Bay. A stone revetment, matching the shore protection structure of the condominiums to the west, will be in stalled where the old bulkhead was located. The refurbishment of the existing boat basin, to create the private marina, will include replacement in-place of approximately 515 linear feet of existing bulkhead. The existing fixed pier will be removed and replaced with approximately 540 feet of floating docks (including eight (8) 4-foot by 30-foot floating finger piers) within boat basin. In addition, approximately 2,500 cubic yards of material will be dredged from the inlet of boat basin. Dredge spoil to be used as beach nourishment, fill behind stone revetment and/or disposed of at an approved upland location. The aesthetics of the property will be diverse with natural features, including a man-made lake that traverses the unit areas, Japanese gardens and native plantings as landscaping. Primary access to the subject property would be from Shipyard Lane, at its southern extent. The project shall seek LEED green building status. This includes, but not limited to energy usage and efficiency, restoration of land and shoreline, recycling, water savings, transportation, etc. The subject property is situated within a Marina II Zoning District and the use is permitted by special exception from the Town of Southold Board of Appeals. 2 The proposed drainage plan would include drywells and a man-made lake, designed to accommodate 100 percent of stormwater on the site. Sanitary discharge would be accommodated on-site with a CromaglassTM treatment system, which would be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"). Potable water for domestic use and fire protection is available along Shipyard Lane from water mains owned by the Suffolk County Water Authority("SCWA"). The proposed plan would include the establishment of a new connection to the SCWA mains. Site History The subject property was improved with an oyster-processing facility circa 1964, together with three smaller detached wooden and metal buildings. One or more of these detached buildings was used for maintenance and/or repair activities, since equipped with waste oil and other oil USTs, and as a machine shop. In addition, an existing metal storage and maintenance building, likely used for boat maintenance, was completed in 1983 and East End Diesel, Inc., a diesel engine repair and remanufacturing company, occupied the southernmost building from the late 1980s to circa 1996. The oyster-processing facility ceased operations circa 1988 and the subject property is currently vacant. Single-family homes and crop fields historically surrounded the subject property. In order to develop the site as proposed, the following approvals are required: Agency Approval Town of Southold Board of Appeals Special Exception Use Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Town of Southold Highway Road Work Permit Department Town of Southold Town Trustees Wetlands Permit Suffolk County Department of Sewage Treatment Plant Health Services Suffolk County Water Authority Water Supply Connection New York State Department of 1. Notice of Intent—SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Environmental Conservation Discharges During Construction Activities 2. SPDES Discharge Permit 3. Tidal Wetlands Permit U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit 3 • • 5006°1 The section of the DEIS entitled Description of the Proposed Action will provide a thorough description of the existing site conditions and the proposed action (which has been briefly described above). The Description of the Proposed Action section of the DEIS will specifically include information relating to: • Site and project history (including prior public involvement and input) and objectives of the project sponsor; • Project purpose, need and benefits; • Physical characteristics of the site and existing site conditions; • Utilities; • A summary of subsurface features, suspected contamination on the area proposed for development and remediation initiatives; • Detailed information on the proposed development including zoning and build- out data(e.g., buildings, pavement, landscaping, buffers, etc.) and site operations; • Site access and circulation; • Infrastructure demands including water supply, wastewater treatment and storm water management; and • Required approvals. Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts The DEIS will be prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.9(b). The Environmental Assessment Form identified the following potential adverse environmental impacts that may result from implementation of the proposed action that, as such, must be evaluated in the DEIS: soils and topography; water resources; ecology; land use and zoning; transportation; community facilities and services; aesthetics and cultural resources; and Consistency Analysis with the New York State Coastal Zone Management Program. These potential adverse impacts will be fully addressed in various DEIS sections, as briefly outlined below. 4 0 tjCT i 0 2006 5961 Soils and Topography The Soil Survey of Suffolk County will be reviewed to determine soil classifications on the site and in the project area. This section of the DEIS will assess the soil type(s) on the site and the associated engineering limitations using the Soil Survey ofSuffolk County and available soil boring logs. Topographic information will be included as obtained through review of relevant USGS Maps and available site-specific topographic surveys. A thorough narrative description of potential adverse impacts to soils and topography and strategies to minimize impacts will be included in this analysis. Changes in topography that would occur, including a quantitative characterization of the cut and fill required, will also be provided. Water Resources To adequately assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed development, the recommendations of the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study) will be reviewed for applicability and consistency of the proposed action therewith. The DEIS will also discuss the relevancy of the Special Groundwater Protection Area(SGPA) Plan. Furthermore, the consistency of the proposed action with the findings of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook will be evaluated. Applicable Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulations and requirements will be identified, and the compliance of the action with same will be evaluated. Regional and local hydrogeology conditions and regional water quality will be discussed. Depth to groundwater and direction of flow will be determined. The DEIS will provide calculations of projected water consumption for each use proposed and, in consultation with the Suffolk County Water Authority, will evaluate the ability to meet this projected water demand. 5 The existing stormwater management system on the site will be described. This will include, but not be limited to: stormwater generated, available information relative to collection and management systems, and system capacity. In addition, post-development stormwater management conditions will be evaluated. This evaluation will include: calculations of stormwater to be generated, details of the proposed collection and management systems, system capacity, future maintenance practices for stormwater collection and leaching structures and analysis of how the proposed stormwater management system will comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including the Phase 2 stormwater regulations. Means of sanitary disposal will also be discussed in this section of the DEIS. Calculations of projected sanitary flow and consistency with the Suffolk County Sanitary Code will also be provided. The proposed project's impact on groundwater quality will be evaluated. As the proposed action includes the installation of an irrigation well, the yield of the well must be provided to determine the need for a Long Island Well Permit and to evaluate the potential impacts associated therewith. As the site is situated in Zone AE, base elevations as promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) would be identified, and a consistency analysis with same would be included. Federal and State wetland maps indicate that the proposed action would be under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("ACOE") and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC"). As such, all required wetland permit applications to the ACOE and the NYSDEC would be made. Copies of all existing wetland permits would also be provided (e.g., the existing maintenance dredge permit) and a discussion of each permit will be included. Ecology All natural resources existing on the site will be evaluated in the DEIS through an inspection of 6 • tj(T 14 2GCh 9s the site by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine the vegetation, wildlife, and general habitat character. An inventory of flora and fauna observed and expected will be provided in this section of the DEIS. In addition, protected native plants, plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened, special concern (or with other protective status) and significant habitat areas on or in the vicinity of the project site will be identified. As part of this assessment, the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program will be contacted to obtain available information on significant natural resources on the site or in the surrounding area. Once the existing conditions data are obtained, future changes expected to any natural resources on the site and/or in the surrounding area will be assessed. Specifically, this section of the DEIS will evaluate the impacts of the proposed plan on the terrestrial ecology of the area. Land Use and Zonine This section of the DEIS will describe existing land use and zoning on the subject site and in the surrounding area. A physical description of the property(size, boundaries, etc.) will be provided. This section of the DEIS will also provide information on the development history of the site and surrounding area; a land use study of surrounding areas; description of zoning regulations for the project site and surrounding area zoning. As part of this effort, relevant land use plans and policies, including the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, will be reviewed. Specifically, this effort will evaluate applicable comprehensive plans and master planning efforts. This section of the DEIS will also describe the proposed action in detail including each of the proposed uses and their proposed location on the subject property. The DEIS will present a site plan that will clearly identify all areas to be developed with buildings, parking areas, walkways, etc. as well as all impervious areas and their use. Once the above information is compiled, the DEIS will assess the impacts of the proposed action on land use and zoning. The impact assessment will concentrate on evaluating the consistency of the proposed action with prevailing land use and zoning. The compatibility of the proposed action with area land use will be assessed. 7 Transportation The DEIS will include a thorough analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the area's roadway system. The work performed will include analyses of the proposed plan and internal roadway system and a full traffic impact study assessing the proposed development's impact on the surrounding roadways. Tasks to be performed as part of the traffic impact study will include collection of data regarding planned roadway improvements and other developments, field surveys and counts of existing traffic volumes, estimates of future traffic volumes, analyses of existing and future traffic volumes and identification and timing of required roadway improvements and the entity responsible for initiating those improvements. The following specific tasks will be undertaken and documented in the traffic and transportation section of the DEIS: 1. Several personal, on-site field observations to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory of the adjacent street network. 3. An analysis of the traffic volume data obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. 4. Supplementary manual traffic counts and Automatic Traffic Recorder(ATR) counts to be collected as necessary to update the available volume counts. 5. An examination of the traffic flow on Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Shipyard Lane in the vicinity of the site. 6. An evaluation of the safety factors by reviewing recent accident records obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. 7. The availability of police and fire protection services to the site. 8. A trip generation analysis to determine the additional traffic attributable to the proposed Gaia Holistic Center development. 9. A directional distribution analysis to distribute the site-generated traffic onto the surrounding street network. 8 10. A trip assignment analysis to examine the composite traffic volumes that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. 11. Capacity analyses at key signalized and unsignalized intersections in order to examine their ability to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed Gaia Holistic Center. 12. A review of the access arrangements. 13. An evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed parking to meet the demands of the proposed use. 14. Conclusions of the traffic impact of the development as a result of the data and facts gathered in this study. Community Facilities and Services The existing community services and the ability of these services to accommodate the proposed project will be described. The services include: • Police; • Fire and Ambulance Services; • Water supply; • Sanitary; and • Solid Waste. The impact analysis contained in the DEIS will include consultations with service providers regarding existing demand for services and capacity such that the DEIS will objectively analyze the impact of the proposed action on community facilities and services. The DEIS will include detailed projections of service demand with supporting documentation. 9 • • Aesthetics and Cultural Resources This section of the DEIS will discuss and depict (through representative photographs) the current aesthetic character of the site and surrounding area. Architectural renderings of the proposed development and/or line-of-sight drawings from Gardiners Bay will be prepared to determine the visual impact of the proposed project. With regard to cultural resources, consultations will be undertaken with the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ("OPRHP"). If additional testing is requested by OPRHP, a qualified archaeologist will be retained to perform same. If any cultural such resources exist, the impacts of the proposed development on same will be assessed by a qualified archaeologist and the results of that study will be provided in the DEIS. Extent and Quality of Information Needed to Adequately Address Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts In order to conduct the analyses of potential adverse impacts, available information will be collected and reviewed and empirical information will be developed. While it is not possible to determine all information sources to be used, the following represents sources/research that have been preliminarily identified as necessary to perform the required analyses in the DEIS. Soils, Subsurface Conditions and Topography • Soil Survey of Suffolk County • Available soil boring logs • Existing studies, analyses, reports, regulatory documentation regarding subsurface conditions • USGS Maps and available site specific topographic surveys 10 ,1�T 1 it 2OCn Water Resources • United States Geological Survey. 2002. Water Table of the Upper Glacial Aquifer on Eastern Long Island. • Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan • Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan • Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) • Nonpoint Source Management Handbook • Flood Insurance Rate Maps • NYSDEC Freshwater and Tidal Wetland Maps • National Wetlands Inventory Map • Consultations with the Suffolk County Water Authority • Suffolk County Sanitary Code and other applicable regulations • Consultations with NYSDEC and ACOE Ecology • Site inspections by a qualified biologist/ecologist • Consultations with the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program Land Use and Zoning • Available and relevant comprehensive plans (zoning maps, codes, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, etc.) of the Town of Southold and Suffolk County • Site and area inspections Transportation • Traffic counts • Accident data review • Projections of site generated traffic using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication entitled Trip Generation, Seventh Edition or any subsequent edition • Highway Capacity Manual 11 • • Community Facilities and Services • Consultations with community services providers (police, fire, ambulance, water purveyor, sanitary, solid waste) Aesthetics and Cultural Resources • Site and area inspections and photographs • Consultations with the OPRHP Initial Identification of Mitigation Measures As the DEIS analyses have not yet been conducted, no specific mitigation measures have yet been developed. Nonetheless, where the impact analyses conducted in the DEIS indicate the potential for significant adverse impacts, this section of the DEIS will set forth measures to mitigate those impacts. Actions required and parties responsible to implement the mitigation will be identified. Reasonable Alternatives to Be Considered Pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, the DEIS must contain a description and evaluation of reasonable alternatives to the proposed action. Thus, the DEIS will analyze the impacts of the following alternatives and quantitatively and qualitatively compare these impacts to those associated with implementation of the proposed action: • No-Action (i.e., site physically remains as it currently exists and is fully occupied); and • Development in accordance with prevailing zoning(i.e., Country-Residence 40). Organization of DEIS Although not required as part of a Draft Scope pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.8, so that involved 12 agencies and interested parties can comment on the proposed sections of the DEIS, below is a proposed table of contents: 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Description of the Proposed Action 3.0 Existing Environmental Conditions t,cT i 11 200E 3.1 Soils and Too a h g to p i�' P Y 3.2 Water Resources 3.3 Ecology 3.4 Land Use and Zoning 3.5 Transportation 3.6 Community Facilities and Services 3.7 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources 4.0 Probable Impacts of the Proposed Action 4.1 Soils and Topography 4.2 Water Resources 4.3 Ecology 4.4 Land Use and Zoning 4.5 Transportation 4.6 Community Facilities and Services 4.7 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources 5.0 Mitigation Measures 6.0 Alternatives and their Impacts 6.1 No-Action 6.2 Development in accordance with prevailing zoning 7.0 Unavoidable Adverse Effects 8.0 Irretrievable and Irreversible Commitment of Resources 9.0 Growth Inducing Aspects 10.0 Use and Conservation of Energy 13 ti NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC EnvironmentalConsultanitothe Planning Board ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING Town of Southold, New York 592 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVILL9,NV 11747 3188 (63 1) 427-5665 FAX (631) 427-5620 npv@nelsonpopc.con, FINAL SCOPE FOR l9 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT tio` "GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE" jOf�N ��6� Z�p6 Proposed Special Exception Permit for Transient Motel 0804 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold R0 0 Suffolk County, New York F4pOF 4<S Prepared for: Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 (631) 765-1938 Prepared by: Nelson, Pope&Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747 (631)427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP Date: November 6, 2006 1.0 Introduction This document is the Final Scope of the issues and analyses to be included in the DEIS for the proposed transient motel on a 17.325-acre parcel located at the southerly end of Shipyard Lane on Gardener's Bay, in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk known as Gaia Holistic Circle. The analysis of the Gaia Holistic Circle project in a DEIS has been required by the Town of Southold Planning Board, as Lead Agency for administration of the subdivision review and as required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The requirement for a DEIS was contained in a Positive Declaration issued by the Planning Board on September 11, 2006. The information prepared in conformance with this scope and the SEQRA process is intended to provide comprehensive input in the decision-making process for use by involved agencies in preparing their own findings and issuing decisions on their respective permits. The document Gaia Holistic Circle ' Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement must be concise but thorough, well documented, accurate and consistent. Figures and tables will be presented in support of the discussions and analyses contained in the document. Technical information will be summarized in the body of the DEIS and attached in their entirety in an appendix. 2.0 Brief Description of the Proposed Project The proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MIl Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. A parking area containing 162 spaces is proposed along the length of the western property line and extending into the northwest portion of the site. A total of 27 stalls will be landbanked for future parking area expansion. The practicality and adequacy of the proposed parking lot location is not known at this time, and may vary based on the proposed site uses and duration of guest stay. Three (3) ingress/egress points are proposed along Shipyard Lane. An additional gated ingress/egress point is proposed from Cleaves Point Road along the eastern property boundary. A loading dock will be provided at the transient hotel building and will be accessible from the proposed access point located at the southwestern comer of the property. A 20-foot wide interior, gravel roadway is proposed along the northern and eastern property line to connect the parking lot area to the Cleave Point Road entrance. It is not known if the Cleave Point Road access will be utilized for emergency access only, or if this access will be utilized for through traffic and maintenance vehicles. Ornamental landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including the required minimum twenty-foot buffer of supplemental landscaping and natural vegetation maintained along the eastern and northern property perimeters and required minimum 15-foot buffer is proposed along the western property line. The proposed project also includes repairing/replacing the existing wooden bulkhead that extends along the western half of the boat basin and adding boat slips along a new dock. This portion of the bulkhead is in fair to poor condition. The wooden bulkhead indicated on the Site Plan along the southwest property boundary fronting Gardiners Bay is dilapidated and no longer functioning. This portion of bulkhead will be replaced with a rock revetment to match that located on the adjacent Cleaves Point Village property. Information regarding NYSDEC jurisdiction and permitting is discussed in the Wetlands section below. Any dredging or removal of fill from the access channel or the boat basin will require acquisition of all the applicable Page Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement permits from the Town Board of Trustees, the Army Corps of Engineers, the NYSDEC, and the NYS Department of State (discussed in the Wetlands section below). A large manmade pond, containing a landscaped island, several recreational bridges and wooden decks are proposed in the central portion of the property. The water feature will be accessible from several different paths throughout the site and will be surrounded by Japanese Gardens and native landscaping. A drainage system of catch basins, leaching pools and piping is proposed throughout the site. A wastewater treatment facility is proposed for the northwest corner of the site. However, no sanitary calculations are provided in the plans. Additionally, a series of leaching pools and catch basins are proposed for Cleaves Point Road, in the vicinity of the proposed entrance. The proposed density and design will be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Site History The subject property was improved with an oyster-processing facility circa 1964, together with three smaller detached wooden and metal buildings. One or more of these detached buildings was used for maintenance and/or repair activities, since equipped with waste oil and other oil USTs, and as a machine shop. In addition, an existing metal storage and maintenance building, likely used for boat maintenance, was completed in 1983 and East End Diesel, Inc., a diesel engine repair and remanufacturing company, occupied the southernmost building from the late 1980s to circa 1996. The oyster-processing facility ceased operations circa 1988 and the subject property is currently vacant. Single-family homes and crop fields historically surrounded the subject property. Approvals In order to develop the site as proposed, the following approvals are required: A enc A Town of Southold Board of Appeals Special Exception Use Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Town of Southold Highway Department Road Work Permit Town of Southold Town Trustees Wetlands Permit Suffolk County Department of Health Services Article 4 Water Supply Article 6 Sewage Treatment Plant Suffolk County Water Authority Water Supply Connection NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 1. Notice of Intent—SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges During Construction Activities 2. SPDES Discharge Permit 3. Tidal Wetlands Permit 4. Mining Permit for Ponds (if applicable) NYS Department of State Coastal Consistency U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit �Trd! Page 3 Gain Holistic Circle ' Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 5g 6q 3.0 Potentially Sieniffcant Adverse Impacts The following description of the potential adverse impacts of the proposed project has been taken verbatim from the Planning Board's Positive Declaration of September 11, 2006: 1. The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: • Site and architectural plan and architectural elevation drawing prepared by Butt, Otruba- O'Connor Architects, • Part I and II of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), • Site plan application, • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering, • Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report prepared by Longshore Environmental, • Site plan use diagram, • Informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects, • Independent site inspection, • Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: a. Substantial adverse change in existing ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such groundwater or surface water quality, traffte, noise levels, solid waste production, leaching or drainage problems may occur. Insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. b. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The NYS Heritage Program Database Records indicates there are no known rare species or ecological communities located within the project area; however, historical and recent records indicate the presence of several threatened and endangered vascular plants and birds in the vicinity of the project site. c. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the site's location on Gardiners Bay / Orient Harbor, potential s Page 4 Gain Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the 967 Draft Environmental Impact Statement significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project,particularly as it relates to water quality, harbor use and scenic resources. d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project had a preliminary evaluation in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of the project appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning. The project's consistency with the East Marion Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. shall also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. NYS OPRHP has noted that the area of the proposed project has not been comprehensively surveyed and recommended that a Phase I archeological survey be conducted unless sufficient evidence ofsubstantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in energy use. Impacts to local facilities shall be analyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site in addition to use ofpublic streets for site operations. h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity of use on the site, resulting in potential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation/use, water quality, noise and visual resources, as well as community character. i. The encouraging or attracting of a large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is expected that the proposed action would attract a significant number of people far more than a few days; however, proposed site uses, possible public access to site facilities like the restaurants and duration ofguest stay have not been specified. j. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. ww* Page 5 .` Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement k. Changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on 11 the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project does propose a significant physical site alteration and the intensity of proposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. 1. Two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. 3. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. Anticipated adverse impacts do not appear to be minimized or mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. Alternatives to the proposed action that will reduce potential impacts shall be examined. 4.0 Organization and Overall Content of the DEIS Document The DEIS must conform with the basic content requirements as contained in 6NYCRR Part 617.9 (b)(3). The outline of the DEIS shall include the following sections: COVER SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1.1 Project Background,Need, Objectives and Benefits 1.1.1 Background and History 1.1.2 Public Need and Municipality Objectives 1.1.3 Objectives of the Project Sponsor 1.1.4 Benefits of the Project 1.2 Location and Site Conditions 1.3 Project Design and Layout 1.3.1 Overall Site Layout 1.3.2 Grading and Drainage 1.3.3 Access,Road System and Parking 1.3.4 Sanitary Disposal and Water Supply 1.3.5 Site Landscaping and Lighting 1.3.6 Open Space 1.4 Construction and Operation 1.4.1 Construction 1.4.2 Operation 1.5 Permits and Approvals Required q r Lm &Vow Page 6 F.NV W(nM`cN"Yµ.. RMWMY�.e,mFY.ITM. Gain Holistic Circle ' Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2.0 NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES / 2.1 Soils and Topography o 2.1.1 Existing Conditions 2.1.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.1.3 Proposed Mitigation 2.2 Water Resources 2.2.1 Existing Conditions 2.2.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.2.3 Proposed Mitigation 2.3 Ecology 2.3.1 Existing Conditions 2.3.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.3.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.0 HUMAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 3.1 Transportation 3.1.1 Existing Conditions 3.1.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.1.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.2 Land and Water Use, Zoning and Plans 3.2.1 Existing Conditions 3.2.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.2.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.3 Community Facilities and Services 3.3.1 Existing Conditions 3.3.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.3.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.4 Aesthetic Resources and Community Character 3.4.1 Existing Conditions 3.4.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.4.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.5 Historic and Archaeological Resources 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.5.3 Proposed Mitigation 4.0 OTHER REQUIRED SECTIONS 4.1 Construction Related Impacts 4.2 Cumulative Impacts 4.3 Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided 4.4 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources 4.5 Growth-Inducing Aspects 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 No Action Alternative 5.2 Alternative Site Designs 6.0 REFERENCES APPENDICES IrV�RI Page 7 Gaia Holistic Circle ` Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 5.0 Extent and Quality of Information Existing and Needed As required under SEQRA, the DEIS shall include "a statement and evaluation of potential significant adverse impacts at a level of detail that reflects the severity of the impacts and the reasonable likelihood of their occurrence". Included in this evaluation shall be reasonably related short-term and long-term impacts, with other required sections identified in the Section 6.0 of this scoping document. This section further describes the level of analysis and the type of analysis expected with respect to the key environmental impacts of the project as outlined in the Positive Declaration. Each major section is followed by a description of the extent and quality of information needed to perform the evaluation of each of the impacted resources. Description of the Proposed Project Background and History • There shall be a brief description of the site and application history; this shall include a full description of the existing and historic use of the site, dredging and site improvements, status of current use, site ownership and related background and history. • Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments related to site conditions shall be summarized and attached or excerpts attached to establish background conditions; site remediation shall be identified. Public Need and Municipality Objectives • Include justification of proposed project in terms of Town goals for site. • Public need for the project shall be discussed; indicate market study used to assess the need and viability of the facility; indicate potential for conversion of site to other use based on non-viability of facility or lack of need. • Population served by the project shall be identified. • Public access to the waterfront shall be discussed. Objectives of the Project Sponsor • The objectives of the project sponsor shall be included and discussed. • The objectives of the project sponsor shall indicate the Gaia Holistic Circle form of treatment/lifestyle as related to site use and design. Benefits of the Project • Include a discussion of the community benefits expected to accrue from the proposed proj ect. Location and Site Conditions • Using appropriate mapping and/or tables, describe location of site, in terms adjacent/nearby significant properties, zoning and service districts, available services, etc. • The existing conditions of the site in terms of bulkheads, mean high water, mean low water, site survey, structures, vegetative cover shall be provided as an overall background of existing site conditions. • A summary of subsurface conditions and features, suspected contamination on the site and in the area proposed for development, as well as remediation initiatives. � .,. >..� Page 8 5g69 Gain Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Project Design and Layout • Overall Site Layout - include a brief description of the site and project layout; describe basis for site yield, proposed structures, services, utilities, access points, road system, drainage, marina and include a site quantities table. • Use Design/Description - address breakdown of use areas from a structural standpoint; indicate if the "patio" will be covered; describe any retail activities on site (sale items, access to public). • Architecture - the architecture, height and appearance of structures shall be identified. • LEED - Details on the LEED green building certification being sought for this project. • Regulations - ADA compliance features and FEMA Flood Plain development compliance as related to structural improvements; indicate requirements, design parameters and proposed design; indicate first floor elevations of buildings required and proposed. • Dredging - details on dredging and bulkhead project; dredge spoil, volume and quality; dredge spoil dewatering, dredge spoil disposal. • Marina and Bulkhead/Revetment - the marina installation shall be fully described including bulkheading and revetment (including cross sections, materials used, stone size, bulkhead type, backfill, etc.), dredging, piles and floats, access, function; etc.; indicate if fuel tanks will be installed anywhere on premises and who will have access. • Grading - the grading program and associated areas disturbed shall be discussed along with volumes of soil excavated, cut/filled, removed from site and maximum depths of cut/fill; fill needed for sanitary, drainage or structures shall be identified; grading for the proposed access to the managers residence shall be outlined; quantity of fill behind proposed bulkhead. • Drainage - site drainage and proposed drainage system and provide capacity and function information shall be provided along with a discussion of conformance to NYSDEC SPDES stormwater and erosion control regulations for construction and post-construction conditions; use of the lake/stream system for drainage shall be identified if intended as well as function, capacity and viability in view of depth to groundwater constraints. • Lake/Stream System - details on the lake and stream system, method of construction/lining; water supply; soil removal/re-grading, design and depth of features, make-up water and source, vector control, filtration/treatment equipment, stocking with fish and species, wildfowl control, stormwater retention qualities if applicable; vegetation and landscaping. • Access - the vehicle access points, internal roadway layout and traffic circulation shall be identified. • Parking - the adequacy of on-site parking shall be discussed; required parking as required by a breakdown of parking requirements for each sub-use shall be provided; this will establish the basis for the parking variance; the amount and adequacy of proposed parking shall be determined; use of permeable pavement shall be described in detail in terms of location and use; identify the location of loading docks and dumpster locations. • Water Supply - include a description of water supply source, infrastructure and availability, water main routing to access the site; irrigation well water supply, lake/stream "make up" water, and proposed wastewater handling and corresponding use of water supply and sanitary design flow. Page 9 Gain Holistic Circle ' Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Utilities - the sizes and locations of all utilities and services shall be described along with the status of future possible connection. • Lighting - the Town lighting requirements, proposed lighting and an illumination analysis shall be provided and described for all aspects of the project including parking areas, the restaurant and other site improvements; compliance with "dark skies" shall be identified. • Landscaping - information on the type, amount and location of landscaping proposed shall be provided as well as information on maintenance requirements such as irrigation and fertilization under operation and maintenance; information on buffers around the site perimeter, retention of existing trees and other buffering techniques shall be identified; the plant list shall be reviewed and described to ensure that "invasive" species are not introduced to the site; screening of dumpsters, recreational activities and parking shall be addressed. • Amenities — describe all amenities on site including outdoor use, tennis courts, arenas, playgrounds, use of beach and limits on off-site use of facilities, etc. • Open Space Management - include a discussion on retained open space areas; areas of dedication, areas of retention by applicant; easements or restrictions to ensure retention of open space. Construction • The construction and operation/maintenance of the site shall be fully discussed. • Demolition of the existing buildings including safety and protection of neighboring properties. • Remediation based on the Phase I/II ESA. • Project phasing (if applicable). • Method of construction, construction schedule/timetable, days of the week; indicate Town code restrictions of nuisance activities and compliance. • Construction management, equipment storage/staging, delivery routes, hours of operation, workers' parking, protection of natural and sensitive areas. • Protection of workers and worker safety during construction shall be evaluated. • Need to modify overhanging trees on Shipyard Lane for construction or operation. • Quantity of soil import/export, truck routes, management and mitigation. • Dredging and bulkhead project details; staging areas; construction methods; dewatering areas; disposal areas; dredge removal truck trips; time frames for construction. Operation • In terms of operation, describe the management and protection of open space; describe Organization management and operation; describe road, landscape and open space maintenance practice, describe any special conditions which may apply. • Detailed description identifying which of the site uses (if any) will be open to the public (i.e., the marina, restaurant, spa, etc.) and which will be exclusive for hotel guests. • Uses expected of various locations and facilities within the site; seasons of use, intensity of use, whether the site will be open to special events such as weddings, conferences or catering events, retail sales. • Projected number of employees required for the various uses for weekdays, weekends and seasonal peak periods. Page 10 Gaia Holistic Circle • Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Indicate activities such as outdoor parties, placement and use of loudspeakers, concerts or special events including frequency, location time periods and schedule. • Truck sizes expected for deliveries and delivery routing, delivery times and truck unloading areas. • Location of dumpsters, truck access to dumpsters, hours of dumpster pickup shall be addressed; indicate if trash compactors will be used. • Details on internal traffic circulation plan, use of gravel road and general on-site activities. • Description of use of golf carts on site. • Valet parking shall be fully described. • Description of any generators proposed for the facility. • Description of operation of the proposed marina, users, frequency of use, etc. • Seasons of operation of various components of the facility. • Lighting operations in terms of type, hours lit and controls shall be discussed. • Snow removal shall be described as related to parking surfaces and operation. • Entity responsible for site operations. • Restrictions on Emergency Access (if proposed) and how the restrictions will be ensured. • Lake/stream system operation and maintenance; lake "make-up" water; fish stocking; wildfowl population control; nutrient influx control; mosquito/vector control; aesthetics. • Water use shall be fully described including: maximum size of vessels, turning radius, depths, vessel speeds in marina, potential for increased number of private vessels docking, channel enhancements (increased dredging potential, navigation aids), and access to existing navigation channels. • Use and management of open space areas. • Operation of the marina shall be identified; indicate if fuel storage will occur for marina patrons. Permits and Approvals Required • Identify all required permits and reviews • Indicate the filing date and status of submissions to the lead and involved agencies. Natural Environmental Resources Soils and Topography • Existing soil, subsoil and topographic conditions shall be analyzed in terms of existing conditions, proposed conditions and measures which may be employed to minimize potential significant adverse environmental impacts. • The existing soil types shall be determined pursuant to the Suffolk County Soil Survey. • Soil borings shall be described to determine subsurface soil quality and depth to groundwater. • The topography of the site shall be determined using site specific topographic surveys of the property. • The soil quality shall be described in terms of analytical results from Phase II sampling. s moa i_ Page II Gain Holistic Circle 0 Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Impact to soils shall be discussed in terms of soil constraints pursuant to the Suffolk County Soil Survey based on the type of land use proposed and the constraints for each soil type. • Constraints in terms of depth to groundwater shall be evaluated by establishing that sanitary and drainage systems can function property; vertical profiles of these systems establishing minimum surface elevation, maximum groundwater elevation and system installation to required design standards shall be included. • Topographic alteration of the site shall be determined through evaluation of the grading proposed for the site and determination of resultant slopes, volume and disposition/origin of cut or fill, and proposed changes to topographic elevations; impact of fill for sanitary, drainage and buildings shall be evaluated; evaluation may include description, profiles, contour maps and/or other methods to perform effective evaluation; impact of grading for the proposed managers residence road shall be evaluated. • Mitigation in terms of soil remediation, erosion control, retention of soils, fugitive dust and related impacts shall be identified. Water Resources • The groundwater management zone as classified under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code shall be referenced. • The depth to groundwater in key development locations of the site shall be determined by use of on-site soil borings; soil borings in all areas of proposed leaching must be included given constrained site soils, fill, oyster shell, etc. • The expected direction of groundwater flow based on hydrologic interpolation shall be identified. • The existing groundwater quality shall be referenced from existing literature. • The water supply source, infrastructure and availability, service provider and capacity of systems shall be established through communication with the water district and analysis of impacts; water main routing and growth impacts must be evaluated; irrigation water, well installation and impacts must be examined. • The expected impact of the project with respect to water quality shall be fully examined in terms of sanitary discharge compliance, wastewater treatment system operation and regulatory requirements. • Applicable Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulations and requirements will be identified in terms of density and current policy on the proposed wastewater system, and the compliance of the action with same will be evaluated. • Calculations of projected sanitary flow and consistency with the Suffolk County Sanitary Code will also be provided. • The nitrogen budget for the site (considering all potential sources of nitrogen) shall be determined using mass-balance modeling methods. • Other water quality impacts related to pesticides, snow melt chemicals (if applicable), chemical storage and any other sources shall be analyzed. • The consistency of the proposed action with the findings of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook will be evaluated as related to stormwater management and discharge. • The existing stormwater management system and surface drainage conditions on the site a.,,•a„E s ,�LL Page 12 Gaia Holistic Circle e Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be described. This will include, but not be limited to: stonnwater generated, available information relative to collection and management systems, and system capacity. In addition, post-development stormwater management conditions will be evaluated. This evaluation will include: calculations of stormwater to be generated, details of the proposed collection and management systems, system capacity, future maintenance practices for storinwater collection and leaching structures and analysis of how the proposed stormwater management system will comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including the NYSDEC SPDES GP 02-01 Phase 2 stormwater regulations. • The change in hydrology of the site in terms of quantity of recharge under existing and future conditions shall be established using appropriate hydrologic analysis methods; use of the irrigation well, drawdown and potential for salt-water intrusion shall be included; drought conditions water consumption and impact to neighboring private wells; issues regarding increased water table elevations, functioning of sanitary/drainage recharge systems and potential to increase flooding in the area shall be addressed. • Constraints and impacts related to depth to groundwater must be evaluated; depth of leaching structures (sanitary and stormwater) placement to ensure minimum 2-3' above the water table, capacity and function shall be considered. • The DEIS will provide calculations of projected water consumption for each use proposed and, in consultation with the Suffolk County Water Authority, will evaluate the ability to meet this projected water demand; the evaporative loss of water from new surface water features, pond "make up" water, irrigation and all water use shall be included. • As the proposed action includes the installation of an irrigation well, the yield of the well must be provided to determine the need for a Long Island Well Permit and to evaluate the potential impacts associated therewith. • Area conditions in terms of drainage and potential for or reported flooding shall be described. • As the site is situated in Zone AE, base elevations as promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would be identified, and a consistency analysis with same would be included; the Flood Zone line shall be interpolated based on "on-site" topography and shall align with the nine (9) foot contour. • Impact of flooding on sanitary system function, generator function, and restaurant/hotel/cottage evaculation. • Mitigation measures which may reduce potential water quality impacts shall be identified; measures to correct existing flooding and assurance that flooding will not be exacerbated shall be included; resurfacing of Shipyard Lane and installation of drainage in the Town right-of-way shall be considered as mitigation; drainage mitigation for area of Cleaves Point Road near east part of site. Ecology • Existing upland habitats shall be inventoried through an inspection of the site by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine the vegetation, wildlife, and general habitat character. An inventory of flora and fauna observed and expected will be provided in this section of the DEIS. Page 13 5� Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • In addition, protected native plants, plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened, special concern (or with other protective status) and significant habitat areas on or in the vicinity of the project site will be identified. • The NY Natural Heritage Program shall be contacted for site file information concerning habitats, plant and animal species. • Impact to upland habitats shall be quantified and discussed qualitatively in terms ecological impact to plants and animals. • The type, quantity and quality of wetlands present on, adjoining, or in the vicinity of the site shall be mapped and described using current site conditions and recognizing that the location of high water has moved landward; wetland jurisdiction of the Federal government, State and Town shall be established; existing biological conditions of proposed dredging areas including submerged aquatic vegetation. • The jurisdiction, regulatory framework and controls of the Federal government, State and Town shall be established. • Hydrologic systems supporting these wetlands shall be presented. • Federal and State wetland maps indicate that the proposed action would be under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the NYSDEC as well as the Town Trustees. As such, all required wetland permit applications to the ACOS, NYSDEC and Trustees must be made. Copies of all existing wetland permits would also be provided (e.g., the existing maintenance dredge permit) and a discussion of each permit will be included. • Potential impacts to wetlands shall be evaluated in terms of maintaining or enhancing all wetlands, maintaining adequate setbacks and ensuring that the hydrology of the systems (sanitary, stormwater, erosion control, etc.) supporting wetlands is not degraded in quality or quantity. • Water use impact must be evaluated including: marina impacts associated with installation and operation, adequacy of navigation channels and boat access to site as well as boat maneuvers within site; include assessment of available pumpout facilities. • Historical dredging of the basin and historical depth of the basin shall be documented to establish pre-existing conditions to support the proposed "maintenance" dredging; impact of dredging on vegetation and wildlife including osprey nests shall be evaluated. • Dredging and bulkhead project impacts of construction; installation/spoil removal; dewatering (odor and vector control); dredge spoil placement/disposal; dredge spoil quality (grain size, organic content, volatile/semivolatile organic compounds, metals, PCB's and related contaminants) shall be included; impact of the proposed revetment on surrounding properties shall be determined; analysis shall include physical and biological littoral processes and impact on submerged aquatic vegetation. • Setbacks required by State and Town wetland review shall be located and evaluated in terms of compliance with maintaining setbacks for disturbance/fertilized vegetation, structures and sanitary installation. • Management of the land within wetland setback areas shall be formulated to ensure conformance with the code requirements. • Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts shall be identified and method of implementation determined; details on erosion control to protect site ecology shall be included. A-.E. Page 14 Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Human Resources Transportation • Provide a thorough analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the area's roadway system. The study shall consider future traffic associated with employees, guests, visitors, and all aspects of site operations. • Include analyses of the proposed plan and internal roadway system and a full traffic impact study assessing the proposed development's impact on the surrounding roadways. • Sight distance at site and Shipyard Lane and Route 25, road/lane width, circulation and parking shall be included in this analysis. • The Traffic Impact Study will include: collection of data regarding planned roadway improvements and other developments, field surveys and counts of existing traffic volumes, estimates of future traffic volumes, analyses of existing and future traffic volumes and identification and timing of required roadway improvements and the entity responsible for initiating those improvements. The following specific tasks will be undertaken and documented in the traffic and transportation section of the DEIS: I. Several personal, on-site field observations to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory of the adjacent street network. 3. The hourly volume report of the NYSDOT traffic count on Main Road shall be obtained and included in the traffic study. A review of the count should be performed and the peak hours occurring on the weekday and weekend should be identified. 4. The following should be included as study intersections with turning movement counts and analysis conducted during all the time periods: • Shipyard Lane and Main Road; • Gillette Drive and Main Road; • Cleaves Point Condominium driveway and Shipyard Lane. 5. In addition to weekday AM and PM peak period counts, Saturday peak period intersection turning movement counts at the study intersections should be conducted during the afternoon and/or evening peak periods identified by review of the Main Road hourly volumes. Sunday is not typically the busiest weekend day. However, the hourly volumes should identify which day should be included in the study. 6. Hourly volumes for a seven day period should be collected on Gillette Drive and Shipyard Lane. 7. Perform a gap study at the study intersections during the peak periods to record available gaps in traffic along Main Road. 8. The accident analysis should include a request for accident records along Shipyard Lane and Gillette Drive, at both intersections with Main Road and along Main Road for an appropriate distance in either direction from each intersection. The accident records should be reviewed and tabulated. 9. The trip generation calculation should be conducted based upon each of the separate uses on the site, such as, the restaurant, marina, spa and hotel. The hours of operation, size of each facility, maximum employees during peak activity, and whether the facility is open to the public should be identified. Any credit assumed for internal trips should be supported with documentation. The data from the Hotel Land Use Code provided by ITE is not appropriate. 10. A directional distribution analysis to distribute the site-generated traffic onto the Page 15 F�. ra _ Gain Holistic Circle • Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement surrounding street network. 11. A trip assignment analysis to examine the composite traffic volumes that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. 12. Capacity analyses at the study intersections and site accesses should be prepared using the most recent version of MCS software available. 13. Analyze and evaluate the following alternative site access configurations: • Alternative driveway configuration to consolidate two driveways into one located farther north from the Cleaves Point Condominiums. • Alternative south end driveway location to avoid conflicts with public access to the road end. • Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for alternate access in addition to employee access to distribute vehicle trips. • Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for emergency access only. • Consideration for use of the combination of Shipyard Lane and Gillette Drive as a separate ingress and egress from the site. 14. An evaluation of the adequacy and convenience in terms of practical parking operations related to the proposed parking shall be evaluated to determine if it will meet the demands of the proposed use. Evaluate potential for parking needs to spill to off-site locations. 15. Conclusions of the traffic impact of the development as a result of the data and facts gathered in this study. • The following potential impacts shall be included in the traffic study: ➢ Day use of on-site facilities such as the spa. ➢ Public occupancy of restaurant seats; feasibility of restricting public use to 72 of 98 seats. ➢ Accurate trip generation factor more specific to proposed use than hotel due to intense support for amenities specific to this use and not characteristic of a hotel. ➢ Justify any credit taken for LEED certification rideshare or public transportation. ➢ Impact of driveway locations and specifically impact to the Cleaves Point Condominiums shall be assessed and disclosed. Land and Water Use, Zoning and Plans • This section of the DEIS will describe existing land use and zoning on the subject site and in the surrounding area. • A physical description of the property(size, boundaries, etc.) will be provided. • This section of the DEIS will also provide information on the development history of the site and surrounding area; the existing land use character of the site and surrounding area within 1,000 feet shall be described and mapped. • The zoning which applies to the site and the area within 1,000 feet shall be described and mapped, and a description of zoning regulations for the project site and surrounding area zoning shall be provided. • Land use plans which pertain to the project site shall be outlined and discussed in terms of their general intent and applicability to the project site. • This section of the DEIS will also describe the proposed action in detail including each of the proposed uses and their proposed location on the subject property. The DEIS will present a site plan that will clearly identify all areas to be developed with buildings, parking areas, walkways, etc. as well as all impervious areas and their use. .�. e..az... . Page 16 Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Once the above information is compiled, the DEIS will assess the impacts of the proposed action on land use and zoning. The impact assessment will concentrate on evaluating the consistency of the proposed action with prevailing land use and zoning. The compatibility of the proposed action with area land use will be assessed. Information on buffers, retention of existing trees and other buffering techniques shall be identified as well as adequacy of screening of dumpsters, recreational activities and parking; impact of the manager residence access road on adjacent properties shall be evaluated. • Impact associated with the marina operation shall be evaluated in terms of activity, lights, noise and community land use compatibility impacts. • Noise of the operation of the project shall be included as an impact analysis related to land use compatibility, specifically the parking areas, dumpster locations and pickup and internal site circulation as related to residential receptors in proximity to the site. • The existing zoning, requested special permit, zoning requirements, parking requirements, and special permit criteria shall all be evaluated in detail including required parking, loading docks and other related zoning dimensional and use parameters. • The conformance of the project with land use plans shall be evaluated and discussed. The DEIS shall address and demonstrate compliance with all applicable rules, regulations and policy guidelines found within the Town Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Implementation Strategy, 208 Study, Suffolk County Sanitary Code, Long Island Groundwater Management Program, USEPA Phase 1 Rule as administered by NYSDEC under SPDES GP-02-01; NURP Study and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook, NYSDEC SPDES regulations and local objectives to include Town of Southold Code requirements. The intent of these studies and applicability to the project site shall be determined. • Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) conformance shall be evaluated in a detailed stand-alone subsection addressing relevant policies; the Town LWRP coordinator letter of October 25, 2006 is attached for guidance. • Measures which may be used to mitigate potential land use, zoning or impacts with respect to land use plans shall be provided. Community Facilities and Services • The existing community services and the ability of these services to accommodate the proposed project will be described. The services include: ➢ School District ➢ Police; ➢ Fire and Ambulance Services; ➢ Water supply; ➢ Sanitary; and ➢ Solid Waste. • The impact analysis contained in the DEIS will include consultations with service providers regarding existing demand for services and capacity such that the DEIS will objectively analyze the impact of the proposed action on community facilities and services; ability of services to address emergency needs of site. • The document shall address job creation and the number of employees, and determine the impact if a large number of employees from outside of the area may be necessary to Page 17 Gain Holistic Circle " Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement operate the facility(housing, schools, etc.). • The DEIS will include detailed projections of service demand with supporting documentation. • The existing tax revenue of the site shall be established. • The DEIS shall consider future taxes, and if it is expected that the use will not be taxed, a determination shall be made to determine if payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) is necessary to offset potential impact to community service providers. • The emergency services (ambulance, police and fire) which serve the site shall be identified and contacted for input with respect to continued ability to serve the site. • Changes associated with the proposed project shall be evaluated in terms of emergency service access; a practical approach shall be taken to ensure that safe and efficient emergency service vehicle access to the site can be provided to the site. • Hydrant instal lation/location and other development considerations which assist in addressing emergency services shall be included. • Mitigation for emergency service access to ensure that equipment can ingress/egress the site shall be included. N�� ,� Page 18 Gaia Holistic Circle . Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Aesthetic Resources and Community Character • The importance of the site in terms of open space character in the community shall be established; the type of open space which the site represents and locations of other open space in the community shall be used in this evaluation. • The visual character of the existing site conditions shall be identified through ground and aerial photography using a key for locations of all ground photography. • The significance of visual character shall be established in terms of the viewing public and view accessibility. • Other aspects of the existing visual character in terms of vegetation, lighting, utilities, etc. shall be identified. "Dark sky" compliance shall be addressed. • Impacts of the proposed project in terms of community character and visual setting shall be determined by discussion as well as graphic methods. Locations shall be determined through analysis of significance to the viewing public, but at a minimum shall include the view of the site from Gardiners Bay. "To scale" photographic and architectural renderings are anticipated, with supporting cross-section evaluation and descriptive text to fully disclose the change of visual character of the site. • Impact of shadows of large buildings shall be evaluated. • The impact of use of fill, increase in site elevations, and visual appearance of structures will be evaluated. The significance of visual impacts will be assessed and mitigation proposed. Lighting impacts will be discussed from a visual impact perspective; the "dark sky" compliance shall be evaluated as well as the potential for a "glow" or "halo' effect from parking areas, the restaurant or other site improvements shall be addressed. • The change in character and visual setting shall be determined in terms of landscape vegetation, lighting and utilities. • Impact associated with the marina operation shall be evaluated in terms of activity, lights, noise and community land use compatibility impacts. • The existing noise environment will be evaluated in terms of ambient noise, sensitive receptors and community character. The potential noise impacts of the project will be assessed through identification of source areas, traffic circulation/volume, golf carts, car doors, backup alarms, building/grounds maintenance, restaurant, waterfall, generator use, dumpster location, trash compactors (if used) and use, proximity to receptors, distance and other attenuation, and the significance of potential noise impacts will be assessed. • Impact of special events (if proposed) shall be evaluated in terms of community character. • Impact of gas dock (if proposed) on community safety and pollution potential in consideration of the surrounding area. • Population/demographic impacts associated with the use of the site. • Measures to minimize the impact of loss of open space and change in visual character and the means for their implementation shall be provided. Historic and Archaeological Resources • The historic and archaeological resources of the site will be addressed through a determination of historic and archaeological sensitivity and preparation of a Stage IA/IB Cultural Resources Assessment (CRA). The site is within an area of archaeological V W42 Nei .s A«E. Page 19 Gaia Holistic Circle A Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement sensitivity and therefore a Stage IA/IB is required, unless significant ground disturbance is documented to the satisfaction of the OPRHP. Any mitigation which may be needed shall be identified. 6.0 Other Required Sections In addition to the key resources identified in the Positive Declaration, SEQRA identifies other required sections for a complete DEIS as included in 6NYCRR Part 617.9 (b)(3). Mitigation measures shall be included with respect to each key impact area as noted in Section 5.0. Alternatives to be studied are identified in Section 7.0. The following Other Required Sections and evaluations shall be provided in the DEIS. • Construction Impacts (Describe the impacts related to construction demolition, construction, dredge operations, dredge spoil disposal, noise, dust, erosion and sedimentation, area receptors, applicable nuisance regulations, applicable agency oversight and safeguards, phasing of the project, staging areas, parking areas, operation areas, duration, hours, and related mitigation measures to reduce construction impacts). • Cumulative Impacts (Describe other pending or approved projects in vicinity (East Marion), determine potential for impacts due to implementation of proposed project in combination with others and discuss/analyze impacts). • Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided (Provide brief listing of those adverse environmental impacts described/discussed previously which are anticipated to occur, which cannot be completely mitigated). • Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources (Provide brief discussion of those natural and human resources which will be committed to and/or consumed by the proposed project). • Growth-Inducing Aspects (Provide brief discussion of those aspects of the proposed project which will or may trigger or contribute to future growth in the area). 7.0 Alternatives to be Studied SEQRA requires a description and evaluation of the range of reasonable alternatives to the action that are feasible, considering the objectives and capabilities of the project sponsor. As noted in SEQRA, "The description and evaluation of each alternative shall be at a level of detail sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of the alternatives discussed". The following alternatives and methods of evaluation are anticipated: • No Action Alternative- Alternative whereby the site remains in its current condition). • Potential Acquisition of the site. • Alternative Design(s) - Design(s) which incorporate(s) features or combinations of features to provide the following reduced impact alternatives: ➢ Alternative which conforms to LWRP. ➢ Alternative design to conform to a 75 foot impervious/structure setback from current location of wetlands and placement of the rock revetment above mean high water. Page 20 Gain Holistic Circle r Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ➢ Alternative parking layout to provide convenience to proposed use areas and reduce impact to neighboring residential properties (more interspersed parking). ➢ Conversely, consider an alternative to centralize parking and provide internal operations to provide access to user access to site uses in order to better locate and buffer parking and reduce off-site impacts. ➢ Alternative design to reduce impervious surface area (particularly the pool patio area) to increase indigenous landscaping and reduce stormwater, groundwater and wetlands impacts. ➢ Alternative to remove separate cottages near east property line. ➢ Alternative with reduced building mass of the large building to reduce visual impact. ➢ Reduction in site lighting design to reduce perimeter lighting, impact to Town roads and adjacent properties. ➢ Alternative building locations to ensure FEMA compliance with less use of fill. ➢ Alternative dumpster locations to reduce impact on neighboring properties. ➢ Alternative driveway configuration to consolidate two driveways into one located farther north from the Cleaves Point Condominiums. ➢ Alternative south end driveway location to avoid conflicts with public access to the road end. ➢ Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for alternate access in addition to employee access to distribute vehicle trips. ➢ Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for emergency access only. ➢ Consideration for use of the combination of Shipyard Lane and Gillette Drive as a separate ingress and egress from the site. ➢ Removal of entire length of bulkhead extending seaward of upland property. Attachments Useful in Document Preparation • Town Engineer Review Letter of August 25, 2006 • Town LWRP Coordinator Review Letter of October 25, 2006 • Department of State Review Letter of October 17, 2006 Comments, Issues and Scope Items Deemed Not Relevant • Increase in sea level due to global warming. • Eminent domain issue. This document is intended to fulfill the lead agency requirements for issuance of a Final Scope in accordance with SEQRA Part 617.8. The document assists the lead agency in evaluating the DEIS for content and adequacy for public review and assists the applicant in understanding the extent and quality of information needed to evaluate the proposed project and allow the lead agency and involved agencies to obtain the information necessary to reach an informed decision on the project. k�k �.,;�,.,�, Page 21 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS 0 OF So • Mailing Address: Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman y>� HQIO Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer 53095 Main Road• P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. w �c Office Location: Michael A. Simon '�0 ,pig Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman l'YCO� ��` 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 June 14, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Oki-Do Ltd—GAIA 1000-39-7-7.1 Dear Ms. Moore: In reply to your inquiry of yesterday to our office, please be advised that reviews of the above application have been commenced and are under a coordinated review with involved departments and agency technical staff. As of this date, reviews are continuing, and once the LWRP certification and SEQRA declaration have been issued, a public hearing for the Special Exception and Variance applications may be calendared. Sincerely yours, ('�. Ruth D. Oliva Chairwoman APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS pF SOUIy Mailing Address: � Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman hoyv Ql0Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road• P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P. Goehringer #t Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. CP ac Office Location: Michael A. Simon Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman lycoum 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Aa Tel. (631)765-1809 • Fax (631)765-9064 � �� i -- MEMO OCT 1 2 ^ 06 TO: Planning Board Attn: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair FROM: Zoning Board of Appeals, Ruth D. Oliva, Chairworljat * r DATE: October 11, 2006 SUBJECT: PB Pending Reviews—Oki-Do Ltd, Location: Shipyard Lane, East Marion (CTM 39-7-7.1) The Board of Appeals, as involved agency under SEQRA, recommends that written information and supporting documentation be furnished to show the alternative locations in the SEQRA process that would provide for conformity to the setback regulations and other applicable regulations. Also requested by the Board of Appeals is additional time for the following: 1) to review the above documentation, as well as additional time to receive and comment on a written LWRP determination as required under Chapter 268. 2) to receive documentation submitted under SEQRA by the environmental consultant and the application with regard to the October 10, 2006 Notice of Public Scoping Session scheduled by the Planning Board for Monday, October 16, 2006. 3) to send written comments after the above has been submitted. Thank you for your consideration. N MAILING ADDRESS: • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE SO Southold, NY 11971 Chair V` OFFICE LOCATION: J KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR H 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON �O (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND oIyCOUNV Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 27, 2006 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCIM# : 1000-38-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Dear Coordinating Agency Reviewer: Please add the attached Project Description, dated received July 27, 2006, to the resolution beginning the SEQRA review dated July 11, 2006. The clarification includes a revised project description about the proposal that will provide a better understanding of the project scope, including all upland and shoreline activities. The Planning Board tentatively plans on making an environmental determination at its August 14,2006 meeting. Accordingly,we would appreciate receiving your responses by August 11, 2006 in order to give ourselves adequate time to review them. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Amy Fo Senior Planner Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals NYSDEC- StonyBrook Southold Town Building Department U.S. Amry Corp of Engineers Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Solid Waste District Nelson,Pope &Voorhis, LLC Suffolk County Department of Health Services File GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE @ EAST MARION UUL 2 7 2006 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREMISES: 2835 SHIPYARD LANE, EAST MARION NY SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 The proposed action includes the construction of a 114-unit motel. The location of units will vary by building type, including a transient motel building with 27 units, nine buildings containing five units each, and 13 buildings containing three units each. The total building area dedicated to motel units is 85,874± square feet. The proposed development also includes a 3,834±-square-foot restaurant, a 1,987±-square-foot manager's residence, and a 1,373±-square-foot pool house with a swimming pool. On- site parking consisting of 189 spaces, including 27 landbanked spaces, will be constructed to accommodate guests and employees. A private marina with 16 boat slips is also proposed. In order to facilitate development the action will require the demolition and disposal of approximately 35,165 square feet of existing structures (the old oyster processing plant); material will be recycled as appropriate. Debris and old bulkhead (approximately 456 linear feet) will be removed along Gardener's Bay. A stone revetment, matching the shore protection structure of the condominiums to the west, will be in stalled where the old bulkhead was located. The refurbishment of the existing boat basin, to create the private marina, will include replacement in-place of approximately 515 linear feet of existing bulkhead. The existing fixed pier will be removed and replaced with approximately 540 feet of floating docks (including eight(8) 4-foot by 30-foot floating finger piers) within boat basin. In addition, approximately 2,500 cubic yards of material will be dredged from the inlet of boat basin. Dredge spoil to be used as beach nourishment, fill behind stone revetment and/or disposed of at an approved upland location. The aesthetics of the property will be diverse with natural features, including a man-made lake that traverses the unit areas, Japanese gardens and native plantings as landscaping. Access to the subject property would be from Shipyard Lane, at its southern extent. The project shall seek LEED green building status. This includes, but not limited to energy usage and efficiency, restoration of land and shoreline, recycling, water savings, transportation, etc. The proposed drainage plan would include drywells and a man-made lake, designed to accommodate 100 percent of stormwater on the site. Sanitary discharge would be accommodated on-site with a CromaglassTM treatment system, which would be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"). Potable water for domestic use and fire protection is available along Shipyard Lane from water mains owned by the Suffolk County Water Authority ("SCWA"). The proposed plan would include the establishment of a new connection to the SCWA mains. JUL 2 7 2006 %_ 9)t\p//tea ,.�. ) �z 0�'� jT�IR O`'uS - t Y" ht S f I-'e'fj MAILING ADDRESS: �/� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS QF soar P.O. Box 1179 y JERILYN.�OODHOUSE �` y�j_ Southold, NY 11971 �Ye 4 OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS H Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON ' �� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �yCOurm, 1111 Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE UTHOLD November 6, 2006 n Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road 5901Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 6, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1, and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, the Southold Planning Board adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and R4 0 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE O��OF Sol/ Southold, NY 11971 Chair O yr OFFICE LOCATION: \\O q KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex V MARTIN H. SIDOR C#* Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON .� �O (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND l'YCOWN Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 I,L NING BOARD OFFICE JUL 2 8 2006 s TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �� i July 11, 2006CL =`- - Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. d Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-11, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 10, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1; and RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i). If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woo se Chairperson • • �� cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers GAIA Holistic Circle (OKI-DO) Page Two November 6, 2006 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, that pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant agents will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2006, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 held a public scoping meeting from 4:30p-6:00pm and allowed for comments to be received at the Planning Department up to October 26, 2006; be it therefore RESOLVED, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental impact Statements by the Town of Southold as reflected in the estimate of Nelson Pope & Voorhis dated October 30, 2006, subject to modification; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 adopts the FINAL SCOPE FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT prepared by Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC dated November 6, 2006 and require that the agent address all issues. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, erllyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services Environmental Notice Bulletin Department of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw File Enc: Final Scope MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS • P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �O-``�OF SO(/ryolo Southold, NY 11971 Chair V` OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR w 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE L. SOLOMON �O (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) .JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND OI�CQUIYI' Southold, NY IY 1' Telephone: 631 765.1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 6-g6-7 July 24, 2006 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act- SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Par 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below, 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency, and 3. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# : 1000-38-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Requested Action: This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building,totaling 80,000 sq. ft.,including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the team spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats),plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MI Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 1 Lead Agency Coordination Request Page Two July 24, 2006 SEQRAClassification: (X) Type I ( ) Type II ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Amy Ford, Senior Planner/Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty(30) days of the date of this letter,please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. () This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. () Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Verytrulyyours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals NYSDEC- Stony Brook Southold Town Building Department U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services • • �. G/l3Jd � PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretary March 1, 2006 �c� Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals / Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re : Oki-Do ltd. -GAIA 1000-39-7-7 . 1 Dear Mrs . Oliva: We submitted the application for a Special Exception and variances on March 1, 2006 . Pursuant to Town Law Section 274 B-3 a hearing is to be scheduled within 62 days of receipt of the application. You asked that we filed the application with the Southold Town Trustees . On March 14 , 2006, in accordance with your instructions, we filed the application with the Southold Town Trustees . The application is also before the Southold Town Planning Board, but they can not act on this application until you review the Special Exception. The Trustees were awaiting guidance from Planning, and the Planning Board can not proceed with their application until the Special Exception and variances are approved. Therefore, the hearing before your board is imperative . My client is very anxious to proceed with this project, your prompt attention is requested. Very-t y yours, Patricia C. Moore cc : Dr. Hillyer 1� DRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CErr :lC1 179 JERILYIJ B.WOODHOUSE O�OF SO(/lyl MAR 11971 chair 2 TION: / Q NNETHL. EDWARDS �� nnex MARTIN H.SIDOR G L ING BOARDoute 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON O Coungs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �O Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk CountyDepartment of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC- StonyBrook* Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers From Amy Ford,Senior Planner Date: March 23,2006 RE: Agency referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a revise Site Plan. Below is the site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Oki-Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM N : 1000-38.-7-7.1 This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building,totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats,72 public seats and 10 bar seats),plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM tt 1000-38-7-7.1. L • Attached is a copy of the site plan application,site plan use diagram,architectural elevation drawing and informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects for your information and review. Thank you in advance. CC: File Enc: Attachments Fl site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10,2006. TOWNO' SOUTHOLD PLANNINOOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A. Site Plan Name and Location ; �= t Application Date: 1.26 G/� / 11 ,_ Site Plan Name: v /, �z c �', 1 Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- �� - 07 _ 7, / CdA l 5 2006 �c� Other SCTM#s: � � � ;� ��r,n 28 3s' _;il G3ia— Street Address: Y " �h `A VGIir'r� �ry 7.o Hamlet: Lui 5� Distance to nearest interse�i n Type of Site Plan: X New Amended Residential If Amended, last approval date: SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number or the people below: Property Owner kt - .06 Lid. Street Ons / inro/n P/6j7_4 2L/C- City_ N• y . State /V / Zip /pO Z 3 Home Telephone Other / -a/a - 7 - Applicant Street City State Zip Home Telephone Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)* >�f1 i12 lC f sI Cbl l2�' Street 5-/020 1Z1111V lZO,+0 City &y7_771OI-0 State N% Zip L1_Y__7 Office Telephone 3V �6j-- V' 30 Other ( : 76A�- 76 V3 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. 10/05/05 Page 1 of 2 ori irviv q-,: atteLata Proposed construction type: New Modification of Existinglotructure _Agricultural Change of use EfA!rkentw Moh e 054u)-&-ct(s) Property total acreage or square footage: /7. 3gS ac./sq. ft. A4ct'7,lal :5 447f&4K:&1 lleS4.06� - C75j/, (077 Acd Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage:/o4'5-52- ac./sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No X If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): 11411 Building Department Notice of Disapproval Dates o? /.'2& I O(o Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes X No_ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes X No_ If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses:_ List all proposed property uses: �' J Other accessory uses: fi Existing lot coverage:,Y- % Proposed lot coverage: /.6. 6' % .2 S1rj jbr,ct i ec ere yy, /` S-5,r ;2 2. 5i-oj Maiuf Bud'" LA a 5✓y y Gross floor area of existing structure(s):],5Z,5-j_sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s):.-�rj, L/jn� S Parking Space Data: #of existing spaces: # of proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Yes No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: % Proposed landscape coverage:_% Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes X No_ If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify that.all-ihe ove information is true. Signature of Preparer: ' -� —� Date: --7- Io/os/os Page 2 of 2 9� � w1tA ' B P COUNTY OF SUFFOLK A pg I AUG 2 2006 i STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING THOMAS A. ISLES,A.I.C.P. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING July 27, 2006 RECEIVED Ms. Elizabeth Ann Neville Town Clerk of Southold AUG 2 2006 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Southold Town Clark Dear Ms. Neville: I am writing to inform you of a change to County law regarding notification for Suffolk County Planning Commission referrals and meetings. In essence, the new law requires increased notification to municipalities, businesses and residents in adjoining communities of proposed major commercial development projects. A copy of the resolution approving the change is enclosed and is summarized as follows: ♦ The law requires the Suffolk County Planning Commission to notify adjoining towns and village governments when it receives a referral where the affected real property lies within 500 feet of a town or village boundary. ♦ The law also requires the Suffolk County Planning Commission to include in the notice the date, time and location of the Suffolk County Planning Commission meeting at which the referred action will be considered. ♦ The law requires developers of commercial developments in excess of 25,000 square feet to notify the businesses and residents located within a 1,000 foot radius of the proposed development that the matter has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission. ♦ The law also requires these developers to include in the notice the date, time and location of the Suffolk County Planning Commission meeting at which the referred action will be considered. The changes became effective on June 12, 2006. Please note that commercial applications referred to and received at the offices of the Suffolk County Planning Commission that meet the above criteria will be deemed incomplete and returned to the referring municipality with a model form copy of a public notice indicating the anticipated time end date of the Suffolk County Planning Commission meeting at which the matter will be heard. LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H.LEE DENNISON BLDG.-4TH FLOOR P.O.BOX 6100 (631)853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER(631)853-4044 The applica* responsible for notification to all Asses and residents located ' with a 1,000 foot radius of such proposed development by CERTIFIED MAIL REUTRN RECEIPT REQUESTED. An AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING, receipts and green cards for certified mailings are to be returned to the offices of the Suffolk County Planning Commission by 4:00 P.M. the day before the Commission meeting. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the postponement of the matter before the Commission. Please feel free to contact Andy Freleng, Chief Planner for Regulatory Review, if you have any questions. G, Si I , h a . Isles, Director D nt of Planning TAI:CMG:ce cc: Andy Freleng, Chief Planner LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H.LEE DENNISON BLDG.-4TH FLOOR P.O.BOX 6100 (631)853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER(631)853-4044 1- • Page 1 of 3 0 S'so Intro. Res. No. 1354-2006 Laid on Table 3/14/2006 Introduced by Legislator Stern, Presiding Officer Lindsay, and Legislators Viloria-Fisher, Horsley, Montano, Mystal, Cooper, D'Amaro, Browning and Eddington RESOLUTION NO. 396 -2006, ADOPTING LOCAL LAW NO. - 2006, A LOCAL LAW TO REQUIRE SUFFICIENT NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION REFERRALS AND MEETINGS WHEREAS, there was duly presented and introduced to this County Legislature at a meeting held on , 2006, a proposed local law entitled, "A LOCAL LAW TO REQUIRE SUFFICIENT NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION REFERRALS AND MEETINGS"now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that said local law be enacted in form as follows: LOCAL LAW NO. -2006, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK A LOCAL LAW TO REQUIRE SUFFICIENT NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION REFERRALS AND MEETINGS BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNTY LEGISLATURE OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, as follows: Section 1 Legislative Intent This Legislature hereby finds and determines that major commercial development projects that are constructed in one town or village may have enormous and diverse impacts on neighboring municipalities. This Legislature also finds that in many instances, residents are not given adequate notice of a proposed development that will affect their community and their quality of life because they live on the wrong side an arbitrary town or village boundary. This Legislature further determines that pursuant to provisions of state and county law,towns and villages in Suffolk County are required to refer certain zoning actions, which affect real property lying within 500 feet of the boundary of any town of village, to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for review and recommendation. This Legislature also finds and determines that while towns and villages are required to refer to the Planning Commission zoning actions that affect property close to their boundaries, there is no requirement that the neighboring towns and villages receive notice of such a referral. This Legislature also determines that giving residents an opportunity to be heard on large commercial development proposals pending in a nearby town or village is consistent with the goals of regional planning. Therefore, the purpose of this law is to require the Suffolk County Planning Commission to notify adjoining towns and village governments when they receive a referral because the affected real property lies within 500 feet of a town or village boundary and to require large commercial developers to notify the residents of the adjoining communities as to the date, time and place of the Planning Commission meeting when such referral will be considered. Section 2. Amendments Section A14-15 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code is hereby amended as follows: A14-15. Notice of Referrals; Consideration of municipal zoning actions by Planning Commission http://www.co.suffolk.ny.us/legis/resos2006/il354-06.htm 7/24/2006 i' Page 2 of 3 A. In every instance where a matter is referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission by a town or village pursuant to this Article on the basis that the affected real property lies within 500 feet of a town or village boundary, the Planning Commission shall give notice of the referral to the town(s) and village(s) adjacent to that border. Said notice shall be made in writing within five (5) days of the Planning Commission's receipt of the referral Said notice shall also include the data. time and location of the meeting at which the Planning Commission will consider the referred action. This notice shall be delivered to the clerk and mayor of any affected village and the clerk and supervisor of any affected town B. If a matter is referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission on the basis that the affected real property lies with 500 feet of a town or village boundary and the referred matter proposes a commercial development in excess of 25,000 square feet the applicant shall provide written notice to all businesses and residences located within a 1,000 foot radius of such proposed development, that the matter has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission Said notice shall include the date time and location of the meeting at which the Planning Commission will consider the referred action The applicant will provide such notice within three (3) business days after it shall have received notice from the Planning Commission as to the date time and place when its application would be considered. [A] C. Subject to the provisions of §§ A14-20 and A14-21, upon the referral of a municipal zoning action to the Planning Commission, the Commission, within 45 days after receipt of a full statement on the proposed action and after due consideration, may, by resolution, render a report indicating that the proposed action has no significant countywide or intercommunity impact, render a report approving the proposed action without change, render a report recommending changes in the proposed action and approving the proposed action with such changes or render a report disapproving the proposed action. If the proposed municipal zoning action is not acted upon by the Planning Commission within said forty-five-day period, then the proposed municipal zoning action, as filed or as referred to said Commission, shall be deemed to have been approved as of the expiration of the forty-five-day period. For the purposes of this subsection, "acted upon" shall mean approved, rejected, approved with modifications or approved subject to conditions. [B] D. In accordance with rules adopted by resolution of the Planning Commission, the Commission may dispense with a report on the proposed action. Under such circumstances, the municipality that referred the proposed action to the Planning Commission may proceed, after 45 days from the date of submission of a full statement, as if the Commission had rendered a report approving the proposed action without change. If the proposed municipal zoning action is not acted upon by the Planning Commission within said forty-five-day period, then the proposed municipal zoning action, as filed or as referred to said Commission, shall be deemed to have been approved as of the expiration of the forty-five-day period. For the purposes of this subsection, "acted upon" shall mean approved, rejected, approved with modifications or approved subject to conditions. Sectlon 3 Applicability. This law shall apply to matters referred to the Planning Commission occurring on or after the effective date of this law. Section 4 Severability If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law or the application thereof to any person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such order or judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law, or in its application to the person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance directly involved in the controversy in which such order or judgment shall be rendered. http://www.co.suffolk.ny.us/legis/resos2006/i 1354-06.htm 7/24/2006 1- • • Page 3 of 3 Section 5. SEQRA Determination. This Legislature, being the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) lead agency, hereby finds and determines that this law constitutes a Type II action pursuant to Section 617.5(c)(20), (21), and/or (27) of Title 6 of the NEW YORK CODE OF RULES AND REGULATIONS (6 NYCRR) and within the meaning of Section 8-0109(2) of the NEW YORK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW as a promulgation of regulations, rules, policies, procedures, and legislative decisions in connection with continuing agency administration, management and information collection. The Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is hereby directed to circulate any appropriate SEQRA notices of determination of non-applicability or non-significance in accordance with this law. Section 6. Effective Date. This law shall take effect immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State. [ ] Brackets denote deletion of existing language _ Underlining denotes addition of new language DATED: May 16,2006 APPROVED BY: /s/Steve Levy County Executive of Suffolk County Date: June 12, 2006 http://www.co.suffolk.ny.us/legis/resos2006/i 1354-06.httn 7/24/2006 RECEIVED APR 2 5 2006 April 22, 2006 1 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board Building Department Town of Southold Southold,New York 11971 As residents of Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY we have many concerns about the proposed Gaia Holistic Circle Okido development at the Oyster Factory site. The overall scope of the project is much too large for the residential neighborhood on Shipyard Lane. The multiple requested uses of the development(healing center, motel, spa, restaurants, educational activities, marina, etc.) are open-ended and will cause significant disruption to Shipyard Lane with greatly increased traffic, noise, and safety hazards. We request that every agency and department of the Town of Southold that is asked to review, grant variances to, or approve of this project carefully restrict the size, conditions, and permitted uses of the property so that Okido can live in harmony with its neighbors as well as with itself. At a minimum it is necessary to ameliorate the traffic impact by downsizing the project, providing for adequate on-site parking for all intended uses of the property, and to mitigate noise by prohibiting the use of any amplified announcements or music on the property. Sincerely, �- 1 S 54+11?YA" �,� 660 LA I l b Pt;o x4t RA 417 � � s" ' � "J, Z SZt) �^ f rtj APR 2 5 3 S-/P-� (.60 a rl.,14 sl March 20, 2006 Ms. Ruth D. Oliv* Chairwoman �Y Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals RECEIVED 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 APR 2 5 2006 � j ;TONING BOARD OF APPEALS Dear Ms. OlivA: Re: Application of March 8, 2006 by Gaia Circle aka Oki-Do Ltd for a Zoning Variance As immediate neighbors of the above property and residents for over twenty years, we feel that the variances requested by Oki-Do will produce undesirable changes in the character of the neighborhood and detriment to nearby properties. Granting height and setback variances will only be the beginning of a number of conditions that will adversely affect the fragile environment on Shipyard Lane. The developer's proposed spired walls are immense sloping structures that taper to excessive heights on the waterfront. The massive "spires" (walls) proposed by the developer far exceed any building now extant in the neighborhood, except the already offending Oyster Factory itself. Spires are architectural elements positioned atop buildings, not the sloping end of a wall. We also have concern about what future owners of the property may do if this height variance is granted. For example, can the re- definition of a"spire" enable these structures to house cell communication towers? If indeed "the project receives world wide interest" and the proposed Motel and Restaurant building became "considered among the architectural wonders of this century... (attracting)visitors from around the world" how is it possible to believe that "the variance would have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood"?How would the Town of Southold handle the immense increase in traffic bringing people by land and water just to view this building, in addition to those who would be guests at the proposed 114 room motel and the 198 seat restaurant, located on a narrow residential dead-end road? This already massive project also includes many additional restaurant seats for public use. A public restaurant will generate even more traffic and noise to the neighborhood on Shipyard Lane in addition to that generated by the proposed motel and marina. It remains unclear as to what the primary business and mission of Oki-Do is? It seems reasonable that the goals of Gaia can be met with a far more modest project without Oki-Do forcing a deleterious effect on its neighbors and environment. Thank you for your time and consideration of our concerns. Sincerely, .4 ` /11""YJow �2 b� v tV121�� /asp tr-i 0^) d o Sh �pyay bi �i ieYt/, 11g3% E i`IQYioh �I "93� 117`7 9 I II�Krcr_C� /�! //4 3 JX4 V �hL lF/ L.pIRP✓dN z �� ,�{((o//t 1 q��t`f/�^"""/ " / u�'�"1 � l�v� W (LIZ T� Z ` v 6: Marion Manor P '�� Ste} Property Owners Association U-�� au c16,Pw cQo) v 2530 Gillette Drive �-Pm�zryr�► v/�✓ East Marion,New York 11939 Southold Town Zoning Board RECEIVE D Southold Town Hall APR 6 2006 Southold, New York 11971 5 B 6� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Re: Oki-Do Gaia Holistic Circle April 5th, 2006 Dear Ms. Oliva, The Marion Manor Association represents sixty-five homes in Gillette/East Gillette Drive area of East Marion. We have concerns regarding the Gaia project, which we would like the town boards to consider. While we are pleased with the removal of the marina gas pump,the following lists are concerns that have not been addressed regarding the proposed Gaia project. Respectfully Submitted, Marion Manor Association Gene Walker VP Nancy Grathwohl Sec. Bob Muir cc: P. Moore 1- Gillette Drive/Cleaves Point Access Road — Emergency Vehicles only must be demanded and enforced. There are many young children(15) residing on Gillette Drive whose numbers quadruple in the summer with visiting grandkids. This exit needs to be gated and locked to ensure that it is used strictly for emergency access. 2- Drainage— We have serious problems with flooding on Gillette Drive rP: and do not want that problem enhanced by inadequate drainage at the Gaia site. The original plans contained drainage ponds on the east side and the new site plan has buildings in those areas. How have they accounted for the drainage? Is it adequate? 3- Owner's/Manager's House— The manager's house has been located closer to the shore than in the original plans. It is located where the drainage ponds were initially proposed. We do not believe there is any reason for this home to be constructed so close to the water and there are many environmental reasons why it should not. 4- East side Parking—WHY? If they plan on valet parking, why are they planning for cars driving the perimeter to park on the east? We are concerned this is parking for the "emergency" entrance. �. TWO•Y, LATHAM, SHEA & KELL01, LLP 5B� Attorneys at Law THOMAS A.TWOMEY,JR. Meiling Address Location OF COUNSEL STEPHEN B.LATHAM Post Office Box 9398 33 West Second Street KENNETH P. LAVALLE JOHN F.SHEA,III Riverhead Riverhead JOAN C. HATFIELD A CHRISTOPHER D. KELLEY New York 11901-9398 New York 11901-9398 MAUREEN T. LICCIONE ANNE MARIE GOODALE DAVID M.DUBINO LAURA I.SGUAZZIN6 REAL P. EDWARD REALE Telephone: 631.727.2180 TRACY KARSCH PALUMBO PETER M.MOTT Facsimile: 631.727.1767 BRYAN C.VAN COTT° JAY P.OUARTARAROr CYRUS G. DOLCE°• JANICE L. SNEAD ALICIA S.O'CONNORA MARTHAAI LOFT www.suffolklaw.com LISA A.N DATO+ JANE Di GIACOMO KATHRYN DALLI PHILIP D.NYKAMP MARTIN D. FINNEGANO NY B LA BARS O LL 'ATAXATION 1 NY A CT BARS 0 NY,NJ,8 PA BARS O NY a NJ BARS NY.NJ.FL.B CT BARS dd LL.M.IN ESTATE PLANNING O ll in sll O aw.com NY.DC,FL,a CA BARS+ February 8, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Oki-Do, Ltd. Premises: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY SC7FM#: 1000-038.00-07.00-007.001 Dear Ms. Moore: We have been retained by Cleaves Point Condominiums, a neighbor to your client, Oki-Do, Ltd., with regard to their concerns over the proposed construction of Oki- Do's Holistic Center, which we understand includes a motel, spa, restaurant, marina, pool and employee residences on the referenced premises. Our clients would like to be heard and have input with regard to the impact such a project will have upon the unit owners. Of utmost concern to Cleaves Point Condominiums are the proposed ingresses and egresses, and changes to existing traffic patterns because Shipyard Lane is a residential country road. Among other considerations our clients feel are important is a plan that will result in a mutual benefit when evaluating the project's scope, density, generated noise, waste removal and shoreline restoration. As such, we are sending a copy of this letter to the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals and Southold Planning Department so that we are included and notified of all future hearings and meetings concerning this proposed project as a whole and, especially, 20 MAIN STREET 51 HILL STREET 105 MAIN STREET ONE EAST MAIN STREEr,SUITE 1 400 TOWNUNE ROAD 56340 MAIN ROAD,P O.BOX 325 EAST HAMPTON,NY 11937 SOUTHAMPTON,NY 11968 PORT JEFFERSON STA.,NY 11776 BAY SHORE,NY 11706 HAUPPAUGE.NY 11786 SOUTHOLD.NY 11971 631324.1200 631.287.0090 631.9286400 631 665,8300 631265.1414 631765.2300 • • 5g�� all hearings and meetings concerning any proposed ingresses, egresses or changes to existing traffic patterns. Lastly, we would appreciate your advising us as to the current status of this project. It is our understanding that the project received a Notice of Disapproval from the Southold Building Department in July 2004 due to the fact that the referenced parcel is not zoned for a "resort hotel/motel." We look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yoursL —-4 , y David M. Dubin cc: Auth D. Oliva, Chairperson of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Valerie Scopaz, Southold Planning Department Cleaves Point Condominiums DMD/dq zll • • L� PATRICIA C.MOORE Attomey at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 / 3 / Tel: (631)765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 March 10, 2005 Twomey, Lathem, Shea & Kelly, LLP David M. Dubin Esq P.O.Box 9398 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Oki-Do, ltd. Premises : 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38-7-7 . 001 Dear Mr. Dubin: I am in receipt of your February 8 , 2005 letter, however, I did not interpret your letter to require my response. Nevertheless, I would share with you the following in an effort to begin our dialogue . It is my understanding that the owner' s architects met with representatives from the Cleaves Point Condominium Association in the summer. They discussed the project and received your client' s initial comments and concerns . We are attempting to address your client' s concerns in the planning of this project prior to our re- submission to the town, we hope to work cooperatively with your clients . As you know the property is a large parcel which permits development of numerous commercial and marine industrial uses, my client has proposed less intensive permitted uses of a transient motel, marina, and restaurant . The site was previously a very intensive commercial use (Oyster factory) with numerous industrial buildings and abandoned boats . My client has begun to clean up the site for the benefit of the community. With regard to the status, we are in the process of researching and gathering data required for the SEQRA review and submission of a draft environmental impact statement . Her plan will incorporate environmental architecture and energy credits which are encouraged by all agencies . Once this information is complete we will proceed with our regulatory review before the Town. With regard to the notice of disapproval, we disagree with the building inspector' s initial determination that the project is a "resort motel" rather than a "transient motel" . The definitions are almost identical, we will abide by the transient definition in the code and this matter remains unresolved with the building department . My client has described the combination of permitted uses (i .e transient motel, restaurant and marina) as a "Spa" because it reflects more accurately a first class motel, restaurant and marina rather than a budget motel . Moreover, the owner' s plans are to make this a world class site. The owner wishes to emphasize the tranquility of the site through design and landscaping. The multi-million dollar development of this property as a world renown and exclusive destination is intended to enhance the value of your client' s property. My client is an owner of one of the units in the Cleaves Point Condominium. As a property owner in the Cleaves Point development, she would not develop her property in such a way that would devalue or adversely impact her investment in the Cleaves Point Condominium. As background information, my client is of Japanese heritage and the entire plan is designed to honor her heritage. Lush gardens and waterfall treatments are an integral part of her design. She has no intentions of dishonoring her heritage with a less than premier development . The existing industrial property with dilapidated buildings will be transformed into a garden paradise. We hope that the Town and your clients will recognize the opportunity to redevelop this diamond in the rough. We hope that your clients will cooperate and join in supporting this application. Vexy-Er y yours, __ L.—Patricia C. Moore cc : Ruth D. Oliva, Chairperson~ / Jeri Woodhouse, Chairperson Valerie Scopaz, Planner Mike Verity, Building Inspector March 2, 2006 I RECEEVFnI ! MAR - 8 20 Ms. Ruth D. Oliva, Chairperson 5�6 Zoning Board of Appeals LT'N;_,eoapn aanrr, Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Oliva Re: Gaia Circle aka Oki-Do Property in East Marion (Formerly Oyster Farm) As residents of over forty years combined, Robert F. Muir and Joseph Licciardi are writing this important letter to insure the Board has first-hand information from actual residents who border the property. Our combined properties, Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Marion Manor, total approximately 620 feet of exposure to the property. We have experienced flooding in this area numerous times from heavy rains. The water gathers along the eastern portion of the property and slowly seeps into the ground. This area is a natural low-lying drainage area for the surroundings. The oyster shells in the area should be removed to increase the natural drainage the wetland provides. Also, not mentioned or noted anywhere, is the existing earthen berm protecting the homes on Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road from flooding. The original drawing submitted by Oki-Do, stamped "received 7/29/2003" had a drainage pond located in the southeast corner wetland area of the property. It has been removed in the new drawings. In its place the new drawings reflect 3 buildings in the general area. The drainage pond from the original plans should be restored and possibly enlarged and situated to run North-South as this is the primary wetland drainage area. Relocating the three buildings in the new drawings away from this wetland and positioned more as the first drawings reflected would benefit us all. Additionally, the original proposed road, which entered the property from Cleaves Point Road, only turned to the right(North) in the original drawings. The updated drawings now have the road running North and South from Cleaves Point Road. The southern part of the road is our primary concern, as it will pave over the lowest lying portion of the property, reducing the natural drainage, which is so critical to our properties and environment. The last storm, October 2005, caused the Oyster Farms lot to flood, the overflow then spilled out flooding homes and properties along Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road. We strongly believe that placing solid structures, foundations, paths and a roadway will cause major water problems for the neighbors as well as the owners of the Oyster Farms property. According to the ground elevation plan, the southeast corner and up along the eastern property line is at some places as low as two feet above sea level. We hope our comments to the Board will allow an opportunity to review the impact to the environment and assist in improving the situation for all involved. Sincerely, Robert F. Muir J eph Licciardi 2850 Gillette Drive 50 Cleaves Point Road East Marion, NY 11939 East Marion, NY 11939 gpFFO(,� Office Location: `O `'QGy Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank y Z 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) 0 • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 y O� Southold, NY 11971-0959 viol � �a http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS �a / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 INTER-OFFICE MEMO I TO: Planning Board and Planning Staff FROM : Ruth D. Oliva, ZBA Chairwoman DATE: November 20, 2006 SUBJECT: Recent Report from Soil &Water Conservation District Oki-Do, Ltd. CTM 38-7-7.1 at East Marion You may be interested in the attached copy of a letter received today from the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District regarding the above pending applications with Town Departments. Thank you. Encl. <u • MAILING ADDRESS: '$ D DLANNING BOARMEEMBER �pF SO(/j P.O. Box 1179 `(, l I�/ JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �� y0� Southold, NY 11971 Chair 0 OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON0� �� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ��UNiV Southold, NY 1111 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ECEIVED p OCT 2 0 2006 October 17, 2006 1 5`)�/ ZCNIMG HQAPO OF APPEALS Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 16, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1, and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; and GAZA Holistic Circle (OKI-DO) Page Two October 17, 2006 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, the Southold Planning Board adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, that pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant agents will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2006, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 Scoping scheduled public participation on October 16, 2006 in a scoping meeting from 4:30p- 6:00pm and will allow for comments received at the Planning Department by October 26, 2006; be it further RESOLVED, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 Scoping will review all information and prepare a final scope for distribution as the Lead Agency. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B.®Woodhouse Chairperson Enc. Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services Department of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw File PLANNINGBOARD)MEMBERS• MAILING ADDRESS: ``�q so P.O. Box 1179 6 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �`� y�l Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: MARTIN H. SIDOR KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex G GEORGE D.SOLOMON 54375 State Route 25 '�0 ,�p�� (cor. Main St e Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND �yCOUMY �`(,� Southold, NY g Telephone: 631 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE RE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT 2 0 2006 + p U /e To: Jim King, President ZONING e�oAAo OF APPEALS Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: October 20, 2006 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle at East Marion SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II In the process of reviewing the above proposed action to the policies of the LWRP and the notice of disapproval issued by the Building Department on February 26, 2006, it has become apparent that the wetland jurisdictional boundaries have not been determined by the Town of Southold Board of Trustees. I am requesting that the Town of Southold Board of Trustees determine the jurisdictional wetland boundaries for the south portion of the property including the wetlands within the marina so that the proposed setbacks to the proposed structures can be evaluated. Cc: Ruth Oliva, Chair, Zoning Board of Appeals Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Mike Verity, Chief Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer 5- l Q .z 13/k- MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS • • P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE ��Of so Southold,Southold, NY 11971 W� Chair �0 l0 OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR H 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON 5 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND Q �O (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) IyC�UNV,N Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 15, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 14, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1; and RESOLVED that, on July 10, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Type I Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency and will continue the review. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. a Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Page Two August 15, 2006 Very truly yours, ?erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Summit Estates ft ✓ East Marion,NY k 5B� 11939 �a,� A ) P, ti� 1 4 11/01/08 Heather Lanza Planning Department - Town of Southold Southold,NY 11971 1 / Dear Ms. Lanza: We are writing to inform you of our opposition to the Shizen/Oki-Do project which has recently submitted their DEIS to your department. Our opposition stems from the scope and size of the project as well as the necessity for variances for a great many of the major components of this project. Shipyard Lane and its residents cannot accommodate the increased traffic, noise, and lack of access to the waterfront. The environmental impacts of this project are far greater than the loss of farmland and waterfront, and the infrastructure improvements necessary will negate any positive tax implications. While we are not adverse to reasonable development of this or any other property, it must be suitable for the community and surrounding area. This project is not. Thank you. Sincerely $ke�( i (A utive Board Summit Estates Cynthia Agosta, Secretary c Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Planning Board 4- all? $I. CA, vP MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBEP.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE O��OF so P.O.Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: ' KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR co Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON % �� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) G' JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND COU,M' Southold, NY n 11 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE November 18, 2008 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD gso Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Shizen Hotel Wellness Center& Spa: DEIS Review Dear Ms. Moore: The Planning Board has determined that the DEIS is inadequate with respect to the adopted Final Scope and content for the purpose of commencing public review. Please revise the DEIS according to the enclosed report from Nelson, Pope &Voorhis, LLC and submit it to the Planning Board. A"track changes" reviewer's copy of the revisions is requested, including all appendices, on CD-ROM. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, B. WU v Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Enc. cc: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Southold Town Clerk, Town Board Suffolk County Planning Commission Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals NYSDEC, Commissioner, Albany Southold Town Engineer New York State Department of Transportation NYSDEC, Regional Office, Stony Brook, NY F 1 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS • OF $�Q • Mailing Address: �Znth D. Oliva, Chairwoman �� TyolO Southold Town Hall If 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P. Goehringer Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. u> >c Office Location: Michael A. Simon Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman lYCOupm 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown,northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS S�(O? TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765-1809•Fax (631) 765-9064 MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Ruth D. Oliva, ZBA Chairwoman DATE: October 25, 2006 SUBJECT: SEQRA—Oki-Do (Gaia Holistic Circle) CTM 38-7-7.1 In reply to the recent coordination under SEQRA for agency comments, the following additional information is requested for evaluation and reviews when available from the applicant: • The current "apparent high water mark" is not shown on an up-to-date survey of existing conditions; the current high water mark is much closer to the existing building than shown. The wetlands boundary is not up-to-date. • The current "apparent high water mark' is not shown on the proposed site plan, instead an approximate high water mark and approximate low water mark are shown, which do not reflect to current conditions. • A landscape plan is requested to include the elevation of retaining walls and other above-ground structures, and to show the dimensions and depth of the proposed man-made ponds and slopes along the edge of the ponds, swimming pool(s) and other types of ground level construction. • Information is requested to determine the amount of fill proposed to be added to the site. • FEMA data and building elevations from the first floor area is requested for all buildings, and basement elevation plan for all buildings. • The bulkhead along the Bay was found to be non-functional, and the survey is requested to show the measurement is from a "non-functional bulkhead. Also a survey will require the setbacks to be shown from all building areas, including but not limited to the roofed-over decks and open porches, must be measured and shown on the site maps, to the existing non-functional bulkhead, the property lines, and the wetlands at its closest points. • A plan showing excavation within 100 feet of all water ways and basin is requested to be shown on diagrams. • Request for a drainage plan for the low-lying areas, especially to the east side of the property near Cleaves Point Road where flooding occurs (possibly similar to a holding pond or ponds for retaining water, reed beds or similar — with advice from the Suffolk County Soil & Water conservation District and with our Town Engineer). Page 1 of 2 • ' Page 2—October 25,200 To: Planning Board, SEQ*ead Agency From: Ruth D.Oliva,ZBA Chairwoman Re: Oki-Do (Gala Holistic Circle CTM 38-7-7.1) The Board of Appeals, as an involved agency in these reviews, recommends that the above be submitted in order that an accurate review may be conducted of current site conditions and proposed site changes, as well as discussions about building locations with conformity to the applicable regulations. �/ K MAILING ADDRESS: PLANN (INGBO MEMBERS OF SD(��y P.O. Box 1179 6 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE `a• Old Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS y Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND �yCow,, � Southold, NY �1 Telephone: 631 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE RE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT 2 0 20)6 CD P j 76 Ti le To: Jim King, President -0-1 Town of Southold Board of Trustees ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: October 20, 2006 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle at East Marion SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II In the process of reviewing the above proposed action to the policies of the LWRP and the notice of disapproval issued by the Building Department on February 26, 2006, it has become apparent that the wetland jurisdictional boundaries have not been determined by the Town of Southold Board of Trustees. I am requesting that the Town of Southold Board of Trustees determine the jurisdictional wetland boundaries for the south portion of the property including the wetlands within the marina so that the proposed setbacks to the proposed structures can be evaluated. Cc: Ruth Oliva, Chair, Zoning Board of Appeals!J Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Mike Verity, Chief Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer i A c1j � E ' MAILING ADDRESS: 11�LANN G BOARD RD �pF SOpjP.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �� Old Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G C 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON `Ol� `�� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND cvu M Southold, NY IY 1, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD EEIVE p OCT 2 0 2006 October 17, 2006 1 J gfo� ZONING ?OAPD OF APPEALS Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-ll, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 16, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1, and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; and GAIA Holistic Circle (OKI-DO) Page Two October 17, 2006 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, the Southold Planning Board adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, that pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant agents will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2006, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 Scoping scheduled public participation on October 16, 2006 in a scoping meeting from 4:30p- 6:00pm and will allow for comments received at the Planning Department by October 26, 2006; be it further RESOLVED, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 Scoping will review all information and prepare a final scope for distribution as the Lead Agency. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ?erilyn B.. Woodhouse Chairperson Enc. Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services Department of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw File - L,K "l-.' I� S � MAILING ADDRESS: ' PLANNING BOARD M ER *pF SO(/jP.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE hQ� Old Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G • O 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON 0� � (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND '��OUNTY N Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Faze: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town of Southold Planning Board Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ✓ VO Town of Southold Board of Trustees Mike Verity, Chief Building Inspector c�0�6 From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner NQS �(�r I p9EP9 P LWRP Coordinator oPPo Of Date: November 6 , 2006 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle at East Marion SCTM #1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7- 7.1 The LWRP identifies the former Long Island Oyster Farm site at the foot of Old Shipyard Lane as a underutilized commercial property. It is discussed in detail in Subsections. 7 and B Section V Subsection 7 states "the abandoned fish processing site at the foot of the Shipyard Lane at Cleaves Point, hasrg eat potential to provide additional public access to the water as a Town marina. The Heavy use of the ramp at gull Pond Inlet suggests a need for more good Boating access between Greenport Village and Orient Harbor." In addition, the LWRP identifies the site in section B. Summary and Conclusions; Item 1. Opportunities for land use changes: as "having potential to be developed into a multi-use facility accommodating water enhanced recreational uses as well as the typical water dependent uses allowed under the existing zoning This site is also a 1 feasible location for a Town marina. Public ownership of this site may be more compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood than commercial operation It would also provide access within this reach" The action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action supports most of the policies of the LWRP, however, the proposal is INCONSISTENT with the below Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP based upon the following: Policy 4. Minimize loss of human life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. Policy Standards 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. The term Water-dependent use means a business or other activity which can only be conducted in, on, over, or adjacent to a water body because such activity requires direct access to that water body, and which involves as an integral part of such activity, the use of the water. Existing uses should be maintained and enhanced where possible and appropriate. LZONING rtion of the ro ertare located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area identifled b the NYSDEC Coastal Erosion Hazard AreaMa- 62006ortions of the Transient Motel buildin ro osed outdoor terrace ortion of the arkin area and leachin fields are all ro osed seaward of n r.c he Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. It is recommended that the structures be 4PPEAts relocated to the greatest extent practical to meet the above policy and sub- policies 2. Avoid reconstruction of structures, other than structures that are part of a water-dependent use, damaged by 50% or more of their value in coastal hazard areas. The Transient Motel and accessory uses are proposed to be built within the footprint of the Oyster processing facility. The use is not a "water 2 • • L - 6 2006 ARD OF APPEALS dependent' use. However, the percent of value loss has not been provided and therefore a recommendation on whether the proposal meets this policy cannot be made. The proposed marina is a water dependent use. 3. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. Maintaining existing development and structures in hazard areas may be warranted for: a. structures which functionally require a location on the coast or in coastal waters. The Transient Motel, restaurant and other accessory uses do not require a coastal location and therefore are inconsistent with this sub-policy. It is recommended that the structures be designed and/or located to avoid flooding and erosion hazards. b. water-dependent uses which cannot avoid exposure to hazards. The proposed marina is the only water dependent use within the proposal. There is no ability to relocate the marina. C. sites in areas with extensive public investment, public infrastructure, or major public facilities. A public use is not proposed and therefore the action in inconsistent with this sub-policy. d. sites where relocation of an existing structure is not practical. The applicant proposes to reconstruct the main building which houses the Transient Motel, restaurant and other accessory uses within the original footprint of the Oyster processing facility. However, the building is located within Flood Zone AE Zone Elevation 9, an "Area of Special Flood Hazard". It is recommended that the applicant amend the proposal to theegr atest extent practical to avoid and/or mitigate all potential flooding erosion hazards. 5. Manage development in floodplains outside of coastal hazard areas so as to reduce adverse environmental effects, minimize the need for future structural flood protection measures, or expansion of existing protection measures and to meet federal flood insurance program standards. The main building which houses the Transient Motel restaurant with other accessory uses, sleeping units 16C 17C and 18C the pool house and pool and the Transient Motel private cafeteria are located in Flood Zone AE Zone Elevation 9, an "Area of Special Flood Hazard". Therefore the proposed action is inconsistent with the above policy and sub-policies Flood Zone AE Zone Elevation 9 corresponds to the 100 year floodplains that are determined in the Flood Insurance Study by detailed methods A 3 100 year flood refers to an elevation that has a 1% chance of being exceeded or equaled each year. It is recommended that the applicant amend the proposal to the greatest extent practical to mitigate all potential flooding hazards. 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features. Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited. C. Minimize interference with natural coastal processes by: 1. providing for natural supply and movement of unconsolidated materials and for water and wind transport 2. limiting intrusion of structures into coastal waters D. A limited interference with coastal processes may be allowed where the principal purpose of the structure is necessary to: 1. simulate natural processes where existing structures have altered the coast 2. provide necessary public benefits for flooding and erosion protection 3. provide for the efficient operation of water-dependent uses Limited interference is to be mitigated to ensure that there is no adverse impact to adjacent property, to natural coastal processes and natural resources, and, if undertaken by a private property owner, does not incur significant direct or indirect public costs. 4.3 Protect public lands and public trust lands and use of these lands when undertaking all erosion or flood control projects. A. Retain ownership of public trust lands which have become upland areas due to fill or accretion resulting from erosion control projects. (However, in situations where erosion control projects have created public land updrift, but also resulted in damage or erosion to public lands and public trust lands downdrift of the control structure, the public benefit of that structure or project should be re-examined and appropriate modifications made as conditions suggest.) Public lands on the property involve all waters of the state up to the high tide mark. The placement of channel bulkheads entering the marina has caused the re nourishment of the beach to the northeast of the bulkheads (updrift) and the severe erosion of the beach to the southwest of the channel bulkheads (downdrift). This area has eroded to landward of the shoreline cast/west timber bulkhead forcing the low/high tidal ranee to move landward from the historic location The huh tide mark is now located north of the failed shoreline east/west timber bulkhead. The alteration of the tidal range on the property is a direct result of the channel bulkheads and therefore it is recommended that the length of the bulkheads in the channel be re-evaluated to allow the beach to naturally re- establish and improve public access in the area southwest of the channel 4 r • • B. Avoid losses or likely losses of public trust lands or use of these lands, including public access along the shore, which can be reasonably attributed to or anticipated to result from erosion protection structures. The beach to the northeast of the channel bulkheads is accessible to the public to the northeast bulkhead. The beach southwest of the channel bulkheads has significantly eroded. The erosion of the beach coupled with the large amount of hardened shoreline structures severely limit public access. It is recommended that the length of the channel bulkheads be re-evaluated to allow the beach to naturally re-establish. 4.4 Manage navigation infrastructure to limit adverse impacts on coastal processes. A. Manage stabilized inlets to limit adverse impacts on coastal processes. 1. Include sand bypassing at all engineered or stabilized inlets which interrupt littoral processes. 2. Avoid extending jetties when it will increase disruption of coastal processes. 3. Consider removing existing jetties when they do not protect existing water-dependent uses and disrupt coastal processes. As indicated above the channel bulkheads have disrupted the normal sand drifting patterns and have caused adverse impacts to the natural coastal processes. The length of both the north and south bulkheads should be re- evaluated and re-designed to improve the natural sand downdrift process to the greatest extent practical to meet the above sub-policy. B. Design channel construction and maintenance to protect and enhance natural protective features and prevent destabilization of adjacent areas. See above response. G``VV6 TO Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of South d. NO 5�� 1F PppeP�S 5.3 Protect and enhance quality of coastal waters. ZONING e A. Protect water quality based on an evaluation of physical factors (pH, dissolved oxygen, dissolved solids, nutrients, odor, color and turbidity), health factors (pathogens, chemical contaminants, and toxicity), and aesthetic factors (oils, floatables, refuse, and suspended solids). In June of 2005, a Phase II Environmental Assessment report was prepared for the site by Longshore Environmental Inc. The report concludes that the site contains MTBE's, areas of petroleum impact and levels of copper and zinc that exceed NYDEC recommended soil cleanup objectives. 5 • • 5SO . One concern with the results listed in the report is that soil analysis was not performed at all areas containing underground storage tanks including a 10,000 gallon Diesel underground storage tank. It is strongly recommended that the Board require a that soil analysis be conducted for all underground storage tanks storing petroleum products and require that a remediation plan to clean up the contaminated sites be submitted to the Town.. In addition, it is strongly recommended that any dredge spoil and fill soils be tested for contaminants prior to use on site. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction. 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The proposed setback from the Transient Motel building to the bulkhead is XXX feet. The proposed setbacks from the Transient Motel cafeteria building is 55 feet from the wood decking to the bulkhead• from 16c 17c 18c sleeping rooms the setback cannot be accurately determined until the wetland jurisdictional boundary has been established by the Board of Trustees A minimum setback of 100 feet is required pursuant to Chapter 275 and a minimum setback of 75 feet is required by Article XXIII Section 280-239B of the Town of Southold Town Code Please require that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policy to the greatest extent possible Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. 8.2 Manage hazardous wastes to protect public health and control pollution. C. Remediate inactive hazardous waste disposal sites. Future use of a site should determine the appropriate level of remediation. The Town's Site Plan application process will uncover inactive hazardous waste disposal sites. Remediation efforts will be specified during the environmental review of those sites prior to development or redevelopment. 8.3 Protect the environment from degradation due to toxic pollutants and substances hazardous to the environment and public health. 6 • ! 5�S(Oj A. Prevent release of toxic pollutants or substances hazardous to the environment that would have a deleterious effect on fish and wildlife resources. The Town's Site Plan application process will determine whether proposed land use activities will involve toxic substances. Protection measures to prevent their release to the environment, particularly fish and wildlife resources, will be determined during the environmental review. Further, the dredging of toxic material from underwater lands and the deposition of such material shall be conducted in the most mitigative manner possible so as not to endanger fish and wildlife resources, in either the short or long term. E. Take appropriate action to correct all unregulated releases of substances hazardous to the environment. In June of 2005, a Phase II Environmental Assessment report was prepared for the site by Longshore Environmental Inc. The report concludes that the site contains MTBE's areas of etroleum impact, and levels of copper and zinc that exceed NYDEC recommended soil cleanup objectives. One concern with the results listed in the report is that soil analysis was not performed at all areas containing underground storage tanks, including a 10,000 gallon Diesel underground storage tank. It is strongly recommended that the Boards require that a soil analysis be required for all underground storage tanks storing petroleum products and a remediation plan to clean up the contaminated sites be submitted to the Town.. Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. The LWRP states that "public ownership of this site may be more compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood than commercial operation It would also provide access within this reach". The property and proposed use is private; there is no proposal to enhance public access or recreational use of coastal waters so therefore the proposal as submitted is inconsistent with the above policy. Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. 10.1 (a) Protect existing water-dependent uses. The term Water-dependent use means a business or other activity which can only be conducted in, on, over, or adjacent to a water body because such activity requires direct access to that water body, and which involves, as an intejral part of such activity, the use of the water. Existing uses should be maintained and enhanced where possible and appropriate 7 Proposed Marina: The plan incorporates a marina use which is a water dependent use that requires direct access to the water body. Therefore the marina use is consistent with 10.1 (a) above . 10.1 (b) Improve the economic viability of water-dependent uses by allowing for non-water dependent accessory and multiple uses,particularly water enhanced and maritime support services where sufficient upland exists. The term Water-enhanced use means a use or activity which does not require a location adjacent to coastal waters, but whose location on the waterfront adds to the public use and enjoyment of the water's edge. Water-enhanced uses are primarily recreational cultural retail or entertainment in nature. These uses may be necessary for the successful financial operation and viability of water-dependent uses Proposed Transient Motel: The prODosed transient motel use is a special exception use in the MII zoning district and a water enhanced use. The use is also non-water dependent however, it improves the economic viability of the marina and overall project and therefore is consistent with the above sub-policy. Proposed Restaurant: The proposed restaurant use is a special exception use in the MII zoning district and a water enhanced use The use is also non-water dependent however, it improves the economic viability of the marina and overall proiect and is therefore consistent with the above sub-policy. Cc: Amy Ford, Senior Planner File NoS��oo6 ZON1N0 9 OPPO O¢ PS s ie SCOTT A. RUSStLL � c�`Qs�� P�" / �, � JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. �1 e' SUPERVISOR ENGINEER 4- TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD ry; 2 y7 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 6k Fax. (631)-765-9015 \ -y Tel.(631)-765-1560 JAMIE.RICHTER@TOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US 7� T REP�� OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER 58� dCT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (� �t rw 8 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS t ` Jerilyn B. Woodhouse IShipyard --- --August 25, 2006 J Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: td. Site Plan lane, East Marion, NY 1000-39-07-7.1 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the Site Plans for the above referenced project. The Site Plan drawings have been prepared by the office of Young&Young, Land Surveyor;and the office of Butt•Otruba-O'Connor Architects, AIA. These drawings have been dated 3/17/04 & 12/28/05. Please consider the following: 1. Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC)under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(SPDES) Program. The Developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-01) prior to the initiation of construction activities. 2. Drawing C-3: This existing condition drawing sheet shows the existing topography of the site and a flood Zone line of AE (EI 9). These two items need to be coordinated. While the flood zone line was interpolated from a large scale map it should also be modified to align with the nine (9')foot Contour that runs through the property. This item should be reviewed by the Building Department. 3. It is apparent that the main access to the site is proposed by the way of Shipyard Lane. I have reviewed this item with Mr. Harris and he has requested road improvement to Shipyard that would include resurfacing of the road and the installation of new drainage systems in the Town Right-of-Way. Additional drainage should be incorporated into the project design to recharge storm-water run-off before it reaches Peconic Bay. 4. The proposed access roadway to the Managers Residence may require Excavation, Fill and/or Grading to achieve a stable road design. The impact of this new road on adjacent property to the East should be dealt with. Landscape Buffers, the maintenance of storm-water run-off and the elimination of erosion problems should be addressed. 5. The Proposed Restaurant Building Setbacks from the High Water Mark should be reviewed with the Zoning board of Appeals and the Town Trustees. It is understood that there is an existing structure but to what extent will this building be reused? By the time the existing structure is made flood compliant it would be well over a 50% threshold for new work. In addition, the proposed design of the new facility does not appear to utilize any of the existing structure with the exception of its footprint. Therefore,itis recommended that the proposed new Restaurant facility be relocated to meet the minimum standards of Town Zoning and enhance the policies of the LWRP. This item should also be reviewed with Mark Terry for LWRP Consistency. Page 1 of 2 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board • August 25, 2006 Re: Oki-Do Ltd. Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-39-07-7.1 Page 2 of 2 5,967 6. Cross section "A-A" on sheet A-4 and the Rock Revetment Detail on sheet A-5 indicate the toe of Revetment to be seaward of the High Water mark. It is recommended that this item be constructed landward and above the Mean High Waterline. In addition to preserving the marine community along the shoreline, this item would allow for the preservation of the foreshore that may be utilized by the General Public. This item should be reviewed by the Town Trustees and the LWRP Coordinator. 7. Storm Water Leaching Pools should be installed a minimum of two (2')feet above the Water Table. Some of the proposed leaching fields adjacent to Tidal Wetland areas may be set too deep. Leaching Pool design depth and Test Hole information should be coordinated to maintain a minimum two foot separation. 8. The lighting plan on Sheet C-7 seems excessive when it appears that almost all of it will be located immediately adjacent to Town Right-of-Ways and the rear yards of the existing residential properties. It would appear that some of this site lighting and parking would be better suited if it were constructed within the interior of the site to reduce the impact on the adjacent property owners. 9. The current proposed location for the Southerly entrance to the site is too close to the road end. This Town road end is used for public access to the waterfront and should not be monopolized by the use of this new facility. It is recommended that this entrance be moved in a northerly direction to align with the entrance of the Condominium Complex located on the opposite side of the street. 10. Drainage calculations indicate that Tributary Area # 13 will have six (6) pools. The site plan only indicates five. This item should be modified accordingly. If you have any questions regarding this review, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Sincerely, James A. Richter, R.A. cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Trustees Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Mark Terry, LW RP Coordinator v1J _S = MAILING ADDRESS: I I •1)PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pF SO(/ry P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOOD14OUSE �� Southold, NY 11971 Chair ~ OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS T Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR Q ell State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON �l da�� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND y�'oU,M P Southold, NY n 11 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � � MEMORANDUM 5 g(�� Date: October 12, 2006 To: Town Trustee & Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Gaia Holistic Circle OKI-DO SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Status: This site plan is scheduled for a Planning Board scoping public hearing on October 16, 2006. In reference to the above, attached you will find a copy of site pictures taken on October 12006. This is for help in review of the site conditions. 4 Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc. Pictures x x h RE RRRIvol 11 ndt][III[ZRIIH rl ou"artill�dnII urtr{ rtICNUN�x1 oo rtIDOpumc oR 1.; rt,(ibun nttl�tnlCl+u[1Nrfufdtnnn¢ibnc+nc4rtrnu[i0ulinnudrouiftr�pC�1Rrt Rdr[,uhucf(�oucinbuvvtlCdrt?u V -'� IJ;:IJ[I[I[LR'UIIIIIII M'I:It1tIlpI:IIII4"II`JOGUFIpUVIUIlUO(IU[ M � (IlIUOIIIIIIIIII IIIN`;1:1(1'1,,1 N{ � � -' t � e. a �r r r .Jr^!.'�--`'f"•`4 ':w -?�;� .i",.�-'-.ifs 1.F'iy.`. 'af a +1 . I �`7, IV ►, ;�� i�C1.., 4 I It I�41421 f `{ 3 I r It - ,: r - �•x',''14 4 tt - •.•.•.i.�-..1a.autitnrn - �' .. ...- ( "�.. .� aet'NM�' t' .- . . . ae , .. ;.,, ., It 'ltMUllle nR nnnl tb r 1 I{ 'Ir et l qi 4PI:tHrUP:I4UN(il(aryl{.;, 6� �Y1' o2G45C>t 1(c 5c � 't�, c? �fe yoL4 Q(op1 F(oo cl r�c� / - ?AL 217 5'0' e-4--K -1 c' � o m Floor n� � 'f et GF��abo� eco ra � n5�oc- sem o ( �� s o w`E KC,&CL 'a-74 c� c L n s© Ll -11-4 '•o Eo of f 307 � j� UKr- ,�o �, I-off, e v r.�s; ja� �pj�IA"l•/C. �' Yv%�✓ ..�-u Toi` rG' c�•- )t UG f V e J �Lcyyt yV�t� J/G9 �9/ hi �/ b r "Vr f APik— ±� s y i � , 4 d /06/2006 /2Will0 , ,l. s` � k i 10/06/2006 4 R � .. r r, arc � -�±ieuw�A�lld......, �+rafe- -_ - e•: v� ;r 06/06 � � '•'fir. ' � � L f' iy ►r' . _ -- �y, , 4 .ani 10/06/2006 c 10/06/2006 ,n g- 10/06/ 2006 10/06/ 2006 R.�tk t 4v �v' am`'yt t i I 10/06/ 00 10/06/2006 r- • - Y t i h e e (F 4 10/06/2006 '� a +� '� � 0'6 D016' 5 � r • i �4 10/06/2006 ►� 10 fi TINFRI Mi 10/ 06/ 2006 10 % 06 / 2006 s _ 1 1 Y f ? w . 10/06/2006 006 rt FF H r - 10/ 06/ 2006 p:6/20 ! 1 - .,, . l_ M 2006 ' l 0 46/2006. J Sy — ° — ov 006 +1, 2 .�•� � _'- - �.. r- " � �.*,iii. 's. �4��, f(� i Y R •��. r. i -� �6- _?'i �� L �" ` NIP �� r � � t �c 1i ♦. x. v� k'jp• r 1 #r S 'a _a Y� (_ 10/06/20067 d 10/06 /200611 fi 4'. A � f � I W 6 a t• 10/06/2006 r a.. i moi:_._.._-.a.i.• • a r q J I �y t. 0/06/2006 f P Ft' i t 10 / 06 / 2006 Jkl r� ' rd X 10/06/2006 / / 1 / .r i r ! .K� 77- 704"MM tr,, 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 z CD 10 /06 /2006 X11 ''n 10/ 06 /2006 - 10/06/2006 10 /06/2006 10/06/2006 F � u 10/06/2OOfi T T�yr�•, x" '. fi. 1. .. .. CD CD m - 5 \ 4^:* N CD CD �•_ cn `. _ I y 111r I F! .� I r 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 r tl{ K 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 10/ 06/ 2006 ,� `° 10/06/20 . .yyr 1 /-,3 Till 1 r 10/06/ 2006 ,',r � 11t. i ".: kk a 10/06/2006 �`` + 1000672006 1 All i .' i. ,. /06/ 2006 ' 4 _, 10/06/2006 v .aT c y jJ fto p ti r��r Yh �.L h tootow i �,. .w.. � R o Ar n .'�•. .?:.. .+. +rte .. � w: Y' r7 " . h. 's y �a F I -ow"'A e >r 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 : I t — ^♦s '4 t'10/- 061/20O6 10/06/20". -: Y ry l j' r ' +,yds,• , _._ A d r. 'n q. 10 /06/2006 10/06/2006 TV Owl is �\ 10/06/2006 / a Q ly ,• 4 Y� d , �`A1 , ( F�Silfq.\ ' Iia _ 1 i - (� y .ape Y { C• f � � �' '�`. L.f .fes JJ '—,,,,, q -' •�`� W�'.^ a Y�. .. � y � �.M1� .. moo•-.w '.. y 1 w- -6 10/06/2006 10-'061200 P .. � /D6/2006 1 a N - O + w 10/06/2006 10/06,' r r S Y a' 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 x r, 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 1•y .t is"- . ti \ '� .•; � =r .. q 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 f4• h, Ilk. '. 10 / 06/ 2006 0 �..� i t Ai T xr .kw J I ' Y t� f ..ti . � Y �` � .t4Mli •'S` y [ }' � i � x � r1,ga WqFr 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 v. a vk ; e _ i LL r. i oR r` Lam,. ``yyJJ1 yy�k _ 4 �'tP6,fYarfi,��' �M �t "� �f��,''l �ry�'N�.� ''1�:,'�° •��,,8 �. ." �, `- .��',�.t�'�. :,,' � .,,�-�-��"'` -�:,c�: - - . �t t a -� ailR a . Vo 11 6./20 w, u 10/6 bO6 v X17/06/2006 S n r r S" r / F � Aim 10 , 06 ' 2006 10,} 06 ,/ 2006 ` R . 10/ 06/2006 10/06/2006 +aS� yp t 10;` 06/ 2006 10/06/2006 T ..p r M ; F. l , .a .:.. lot 10/06 / 2006 110/06/2006 < \ 1O/M/2006 a'O �ieels Marion Manor Association 2530 Gillette Drive East Marion,New York 11939 Southold Town Zoning Board Southold Town Hall R— Southold,New York 11971 OCT 1 6 MOS Re: Oki-Do Gaia Holistic Circle ZOWN,% APPEALS March 1st,2006 Dear Ms.Oliva, The Marion Manor Association represents sixty-five homes in Gillette/East Gillette Drive area of East Marion. We have concerns regarding the Gaia project which we would like the town boards to consider. The Gaia project seems admirable,striving for Leeds certification and would no doubt improve the aesthetics of the property. We are pleased with the removal of the gas pump at the marina which was in the original proposal. All this aside,consider that any variance and/or zoning changes granted for the development will remain if the owner decides against pursuing Leeds certification and for the future owner who will not be operating a holistic spa. The following page lists are greatest concerns regarding the proposed Gaia project. Respectfully Submitted Marion Manor Association Gene Walker VP Nancy Grathwohl Sec. Bob Muir RECEIVED • • OCT 1 6 2006 G'961 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Gillette Drive/Cleaves Point Access Road. The entrance must be marked and designated "Emergency Vehicles Only" which should be strictly enforced. There are many young children (15)residing on Gillette Drive whose numbers quadruple in the summer with visiting grandchildren and summer residents. This exit needs to gated and locked to ensure it is not used by Gaia employees, construction and commercial deliveries. This restriction should apply during the construction as well as after completion. 2. Drainage. We have serious problems with flooding on Gillette Drive and do not want the problem enhanced by inadequate draining at the Gaia site. The drainage plans and building plans do not seem sufficient to correct the flooding of this area. The elevation plan reflects very low lying areas along the east end of the property. The plans also have test bore results which show a large amount of clay in the area further reducing water saturation into the earth. 3. Owner/Manager's House. We believe there is no logical reason why this home and at least three to five other structures need to be constructed along the eastern property line. The homes in the current plan are both too close to the water and located at the lowest points in the property, most likely wetland area. According to the ground elevation plan, the south-east corner and up along the eastern property line is at some places as low as two feet above sea level. 4. East Side Parking and Road. The roads and parking areas along the east side of the property not only further reduce drainage in the area, they also contradict the "quiet and peaceful" statement of the development. The proposed road runs parallel to the backyards of properties on Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road. We ask that the originally submitted plans be reviewed as they respected the land witli both better drainage (ponds) with less roads and buildings along the eastern property line. ROBERT F.RIRIR 2850 GILLETTE DRIVE Phone 631 ARIGN.NY 11939 Email nmjftb@oPkmllne.net July 05,2004 Ruth D. Oliva-Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals R C x rr p� ,C n Town Hall 53095 Main Road ori 6 05 Southold,NY 11971 5 C (0q 'Subject: GAIA CIRCLE formerly OHI-DO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Dear Ms. Oliva:, This is a follow-up to my letter of September 05,2003 now that a revised plan has been submitted under toe name Of GAIA CIRCLE. In addition to my previously stated concerns I add the following: I. The plan calls for 107 living units in the Spa and the cottages plus 3 houses for managers. Allowing 2 people Per unit this would allow for 220 residents in addition to the 200 seat restaurant. This would seem to be a higher density than our Community could support giving the potential additional demand on our police, fire,and other emergency services. 2. The addition of a"Gas Dock" to the marina area would seem to be an unnecessary potential pollution and fire danger to a concentrated residential area. 3. The pools or ponds would be decorative but would there be areas. enough water circulation to avoid mosquito breeding ' . There must be a permanent commitment to keeping the property as a tax producer and not allow it to ever be a non-proSt"health related facility as San Simeon did to avoid property taxes. Your consideration of these concerns will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Robert F.Muir RORERT F.4 • Home Phone 631 477_ 2850 GILLETTE DtUyE Email muirbo 2225 TM MARION,NY l 1939 b rt o 77-2225 September 05,2003 Lynda A. Tortora, Chairperson Zoning Board of A F "�'� Town Hall PPeals R 53095 Main Road ^^, oCT Southold, -° NY 11971 S�101 Dear Ms Tortora:, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Reference is made to the OKI-DO application for the property located on Shipyard wife, Nancy Muir and I are he owners Of lots#f and#7 on the ori the Tax Map backingPYard Lane,East Marion,Ny. My up to the OKI-DO property question. genal Marlon Manor subdivision or No.29.1 on We are concerned with the following: 1. The Emergency nature of the Emergency Road with the outlet on Cleaves point Road and Gillette Drive. Our reservation is the was allowed to gancY Exit. Our streets and narrow and would not be able to support the additional traffic if this families with small children-commonWe entrance or exit, Our area is rapidly becoming fully developed with many We would strenuously object if the streets became a major exit or entrance. We understand the need for an Emergency Exit Road but urge that it be a limited or gated exit,since the Manager's house will be located very near the terminus of the road. We have seen too man Gillette and turn right onto Cleaves Point Road expecting it to be a connecting road. It would be doubly dangerous if large construction vehicles were allowed Burin Y cars come down g the building period The object x. becoming a Holistic Center with only walkwa Provide a quiet,relaxing atmosphere for[hair distraction if there Ys,not roads for access to the buildings is to was a regular exit and entrance o. Continuous traffic around the ance off Cleaves Point Road. Perimeter road would be a 2• Drama a is also a shells and dirt a on Potential problem, you 8 the southeastern border of the vile ote that there is a"berm"consistin and the adjacent properties. Also the Town P P �LO k g n1OstIY of oyster Highway eQP water from draining to Cleaves Point Road Portion of the road to help control the drama a and �Partment constructed a`° g the flow of water Burin well"at the end of the paved We purchased Lot#6 g heavy rainstorms. the original house in 1888µ,bb b�Mazion Manor"Aug�t 13, 1963 point and would object to an ame°ar full hme residence. We a enjoyed oour house in 1971. We enlarged connecting Cleaves Point Road with OKI-DO ng the streets to accommodate more traffic that wothe uld be caused by Hteffils acceptable solution. General] we as a regular entrance or Y find the proposal to be v Wit• An emergency exit would be an very well planned. Sincerely, • ROBERT F. MUIR • 2850 GILLETTE DRIVE EAST MARION,NY 11939 James F. Kine. President October 14-2006 Town Trustees Southold,N.Y. 11971 r'F wn 7 President King: OCT 1 6 2006 Re. Gaia Circle Oki-Do proposal S ZON NG 30Ai`;0 OF APPEALS Nanev and I have been property owners on Gillette Drive since 1961 and we built a summer home in 1971 and retired full time in 1988 Oki-Do will be our back fence neighbors and the emergency exit from the property at Cleaves Point Road is our property line on the south. We have several serious concerns with the project. We want the"Emergency Exit"to be Gated and locked with access only for emergency activities. We have 60 residences in Marion Manor,now nearly fully developed with many young families and nine than 16 young children playing in the streets,waiting for the school bus or on their way to the beach. Additional traffic from the Spa or during construction would create a very dangerous situation We have had serious drainage problems when there are heavy rains or Northeaster storms. Close attention to the control of the flow of water at the Spa is required in order that the flooding situation not be increased. The promoters claim that this entity will be"Profit-Making" and will be a taxpayer for all local services including Schools:Fire Departments etc.. This must be guaranteed even if it later becomes a non-profit org. We have followed the progress closely and have written several letters to the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals,copies are attached Also there are 4 photos taken after the October 2005 rainstorm to show the extent of the flooding on the Oki-Do properly as well one slowing the road end at Cleaves Point Road and the yards of the two adjacent houses. We appreciate any input and oversight you may be able to fmmsh as this Project progresses. In addition to being an immediate bordering neighbor and taxpayer,I am also a Director . of The Marion Manor Property owners Association and the District Treasurer of the Oysterponds School District. Respectfully submitted, • ROBERT F. MtJIR • 2850 GILLETTE DRIVE EAST MARION,NY 11939 Ms Jeri Woodhouse,Chairman October 14,2006 Planning Board Southold,NY 11971 RE,-' 'El ' � Dear Chairman Woodhouse: OCT 1 6 7 06 Re: Gaia Circle-Oki-Do 5$bpi IdUA110 OF APPEALS As a longtime resident and adjacent property otrner I bring to your attention three continuing concerns with the current proposal. 1. Drainage and the overflow onto the bordering Gillette Drive properties 2 The necesMy to have the Emegcocy Exit coo Cleaves Point Road be a truly Gated and Restricted entrance. 3 There be a provision for continued Tax Basis for the property no matter what the use designation is non-profit or beahh related use. This is particularly important for the benefit of the School District and other fire protection and support services to our community. I have written to The Planning Band and The Zoning Board of Appeals,copies attached., at earlier dates Thew commas are still valid plus these additional thoughts. Also enclosed we pictures taken alter the October 2005 storm which left our area,and the Oyster Plant property under 2 feet of water for the southern 1/3 of the property. The water table is only 4 ft beim ground is much ofthe arca and planning to handle the amount of rain in one of the large stunts cannot be contained with dry wells that are only 4 feet deep. There is already a dry well at the end of the paved portion of Cleaves point Road and that is not adequate at the present. C b�+�/ (C ``1'4 D I✓ot Rey Robert and Nancv Muir 2850 Gillette Drive East Marion,NY 11939 March 2, 2006 ^ Ms. Ruth D. Oliva, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals OCTs Town Hall 2006 53095 Main Road 5 961 Southold, NY 11971 ZONING EOAP� OF APPEALS Dear Ms. Oliva Re: Gaia Circle aka Oki-Do Property in East Marion (Formerly Oyster Farm) As residents of over forty years combined, Robert F. Muir and Joseph Licciardi are writing this important letter to insure the Board has first-hand information from actual residents who border the property. Our combined properties, Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Marion Manor, total approximately 620 feet of exposure to the property. We have experienced flooding in this area numerous times from heavy rains. The water gathers along the eastern portion of the property and slowly seeps into the ground. This area is a natural low-lying drainage area for the surroundings. The oyster shells in the area should be removed to increase the natural drainage the wetland provides. Also, not mentioned or noted anywhere, is the existing earthen berm protecting the homes on Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road from flooding. The original drawing submitted by Oki-Do, stamped"received 7/29/2003" had a drainage pond located in the southeast corner wetland area of the property. It has been removed in the new drawings. In its place the new drawings reflect 3 buildings in the general area. The drainage pond from the original plans should be restored and possibly enlarged and situated to run North-South as this is the primary wetland drainage area. Relocating the three buildings in the new drawings away from this wetland and Positioned more as the first drawings reflected would benefit us all. Additionally, the original proposed road, which entered the property from Cleaves Point Road, only turned to the right(North) in the original drawings. The updated drawings now have the road running North and South from Cleaves Point Road. The southern part of the road is our primary concern, as it will pave over the lowest lying portion of the property, reducing the natural drainage, which is so critical to our properties and environment. The last storm, October 2005, caused the Oyster Farms lot to flood, the overflow then spilled out flooding homes and properties along Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road. We strongly believe that placing solid structures, foundations, paths and a roadway will cause major water problems for the neighbors as well as the owners of the Oyster Farms property. According to the ground elevation plan, the southeast corner and up along the eastern property line is at some places as low as above sea level. two feet We hope our comments to the Board will allow an opportunity to review the impact to the environment and assist in improving the situation for all involved. Sincerely, Robert F. Muir Joseph Licciardi 2850 Gillette Drive 50 Cleaves Point Road East Marion, NY 11939 East Marion, NY 11939 � A4 d BBBEBT F.MBIB is q 2GILLETTE DRIVE EAST MARION,NY 11939 Home Phone 631477-2225 Email muirbob@optonline.net SEP September 05,2003 Lynda A. Tortora,Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 n, I Dear Ms Tortora: D -3 / , ` Reference is made to the OKI-DO application for the property located on Shipyard Lane,East Marion,NY. My wife,Nancy Muir and I are the owners of lots 6 and 7 on the original Marion Manor subdivision or No. 29.1 on the Tax Map backing up to the OKI-DO property in question. We are concerned with the following: I. The Emergency Road with the outlet on Cleaves Point Road and Gillette Drive. Our concern is the nature of the Emergency Exit. Our streets are narrow and would not be able to support the additional traffic if this was allowed to become a common entrance or exit, Our area is rapidly becoming fully developed with many families with small children. We would strenuously object if the streets became a major exit or entrance. We understand the need for an Emergency Exit Road but urge that it be a limited or gated exit. We have seen too many cars come down Gillette and turn right onto Cleaves Point Road expecting it to be a connecting road. It would be doubly dangerous if large construction vehicles were allowed during the building period. The object of the property becoming a Holistic Center with only walkways,not roads for access to the buildings, is to provide a quiet,relaxing atmosphere for their guests. Continuous traffic around the perimeter road would be a distraction if there was a regular exit or entrance off Cleaves Point Road. 2. Drainage is also a potential problem. You will note that there is a"berm"consisting mostly of oyster shells and dirt along the southeastern border of the property to keep water from draining onto Cleaves Point Road and the adjacent properties. Also the Town Highway Department constructed a"dry well'at the end of the paved portion of the road to help control the drainage and the flow of water during heavy rainstorms. We purchased Lot#6 on the"Map of Marion Manor"August 13, 1963 and built our house in 1971. We enlarged the original house in 1988 when it became our full time residence. We have enjoyed the peaceful existence to this point and would object to any widening of the streets to accommodate more traffic that would be caused by the connecting Cleaves Point Road with OKI-DO as a regular entrance or exit. An emergency exit would be an acceptable solution. Generally we find the proposal to be very well planned. / Sincerely, ��Cu t ` 0YSTERPONDS U.P.S.D. IN ORIENT Cv 23405 MAINROAD ORIENT N RECEIVED Telephone 631323-2410 Fax 631313-3713 QCT 1 � 2006 Website:www.oysterponds.kl2.ny.us Dr.Stuart Rachlin (�p ' O DKA, ' Superintendent ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS October 16,2006 Ms.Jeri Woodhouse,Chairperson Southold Town Planning Board P O Box 1179 / Southold,NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, I am writing to you today,on behalf of the Board of Education of the Oysterponds Union Free School District in Orient,regarding the application of the GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do,Ltd., for the construction of a holistic health center to be located at 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion. Of the utmost concern to the existence of this school district is the potential fiscal impact that such a project would have.It has been brought to our attention that the applicant has,in the past,been granted not-for-profit status;as such,the removal of this property from the tax rolls would engender a decrease in total assessments and revenue—the primary source of income required by a school district to operate.Under no circumstances can we maintain a school with increased costs and,at the same time,suffer an erosion of our revenue base. As has been done in the past with projects with the potential for being granted tax-exempt status,we would expect that PILOT payments would be paid to the district equal to the lost tax revenue, should that status be granted. Also of concern to us is the impact of a potentially increased student enrollment due to employee housing(on- site or off-site)and/or winter rentals of the rooms at the facility. As a district of approximately 100 students in grades K-6,space constraints are of great concern; in addition, should any of these students require special services,we could be forced to employ additional teachers or service providers which would greatly increase our budget—well after the beginning of the school year.This increase in student population would,of course, also impact upon our transportation. The Oki-Do project puts the future of the Oysterponds School District at a turning point; it is now up to your Board to determine in which direction we will proceed. Kindly inform me as to the progress and status of this project,and rest assured that I, in tum,will relate all information to my Board of Education. Sincerely, Stuart Rachlin,Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools Cc: Mr.B. Semon Ms.R.Oliva ✓ Mr. J.King Supervisor S. Russell II I I I I I I 11 LU LI U LIL LIJ 00 I i OA I I 0 0 - ® I O I I �!9 9 o©oo®o0 0000 11V Butt•Otruba-O'Connor °°° mn ;;;PLAN_LSE MSM na Architects, AIA n« Mlglp � pj w QgVAFKOXLJP(,`CM r orumex nix XFS a lOMN O'�aU111[IA N!M Y,YK 'S� 0 AR PALk a OF Iif "Y, 4" '1,4 _ 1 p . I 1 IT Ip fita., u +u "IT F'' I0 All IT - - I i f 1 Ir HUSTICCIRCLE 1 , Southold To`wvnship, New 'fork c � 8 A ) . A ` o-F � 4 J a 41 _ 1 / 9 i A r.Y11' - �, a�k '� � ' a - _ - 4 '" r V• -: 'tiY � " d ^ 1 'n SSA.{ Jti .:. _ 6' ,��'��1`I i +�.V •! Y , - _'_ __ - 1 4 � ♦ � � t � � � l S�� I�r,�. 4r h�R, a .. Y + . . l ' w , f t � I IT Ig Pg6A T � i IT Y tll Y GALA HOLISTIC CIRCLE SHIPYARD LANE SOUTHoLD TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY 1 fir. t„ n < 7, Butte Otruba — O ' Connor Y Architects , AIA a +yl �r1 ry ip r 1 t '•�f� , - - - , - - (py�qJy., o f �,ur s3 '7 ^ � ' t �-g 1 ,. ... ,:, '�, ,,• � � � � � T, � . . - _ M"PlannlnetiBoarP 4 { 1062, Northern Boulevard - Roslyn, New,York 17576 ' (516)625-6625 FAX -(S'18) 625-6629 �`r�,� S�?fi� r. ��.� :•I 1 '. - r ;r„ � - ? , , . � - . _ - .� , wl IT le, n4•P �(4��b E';'1•� M1. ', T.i.• { � f ��,f, � �/ -,1', �',:. .� � - - ., - - .._.. - ' .. _ _ _ .a� _-_. : . . - . - : - _ _. 1 nC f A M'14 v fP ffo wci U O 9 LLLL {KL Ua woo11, b� tiryi�rx�l a. ! r"� '" - GIS DRIVE - Lot4 - - 1 I n 8(6duwon - d 'Marlon Manor' Ca2= nb F% No. DR 'm a yt0 a >r Lot 9 LMB Lot 7 LoLot t 8 ¢ REQUIRED PAR INC 9RAy� 8 bry1 l ro FOR 3 RESIDEN ES 9 ,A n "ROCK�JE . sx a 6 Z +e r �( 4 _ iq ® fTIE LINE ALONG W , + HI6H WATER LINE W 3 x 1 '- - �• ' " , , �� \—EXISTING LAN05CAMNG TO REMAIN U Z tqF � e • a ��® - ry ,fix o GARDINERS BAY z � w 0go _ z0 1 - _ GRAVEL ROADWAY �ale e+ew fe+►usreean'ry� a a CD 4 r WETL �Fjt HIGH WATER MARK d WOOD BULKHEAD Q w 0 LANDWARD LIMIT OF s �• p! - z WETLANDS AS FLAGGED BY + Z5'-0' '" '4t-° JEFFREY L SEEMAN, RE.M. OFy TIE L IO E IDE fZC!) sel'� SETBACK >Wa OO CORPORATION I ONNAUGT 2L .. N 2005 � Q z 0 WOOD BUL `ICY a_ cai ¢ 0 o n o 4 L EAD DREDGED BASW i 5P tr e �5. '� -I'M• d,a - u LiRr ? ,M�,i-Caw #.' OR t3E82 ACRES GARDEN WALL � d ' f � TO TIE LNE 0` GA5 PUMP DOCK `( / y K LL O 2T ' BULKHEAD WOOD x!r a t I �¢ � rpeeuw 7 '` � - - - - - - - - - - SITE PLAN KEY x SYMBOL BOLDING NAME WILDMG DESCWWN BU1.OM ONE SPA /HOTEL/HESTAURW 1 o LL l _ + ! HEDGE ON , �s BUIDMKi 7W0 CENTERBULD1Ki V1 fig PROPERTY �. eALM T1 2 LINE QA BULDl10 THREE A FIVE UN �f1Q TB 8LROOM5 r HEDGE r 1 � BULDHG THREE THREE L1iT8 BL�rIG ROOM ¢ rn 41X - !� BU1-DlK3 F011l'F MANAOBi'8 FESDBJCE +Ca ` HEDGE Bl1LDNO FIVE CARETAKERS RESIDENCE ^ N SUIIJ)m SIX GATE HOUSE - ' 70' SU1J)W SEVEN POOL HOUSE (LANDSCAPE r SLFFER FROM + x� RE5.DISTR(CT) ' 8 BULpdO 9diR MAINTENANCE �• ' c� T w ',, 1,+' % % % X x _ f A 3 J A f % P f ♦ d d d o s X Q BULDMG NINE MECHANICAL BULDW O HEDGE - 1 T GARDEN WALL % Pf ssI FT x f x x f s l riX Y s ASPHALT PARKING AREA 81 11PYARD f,M _ - - - -------;-- - - - O _ HIGH WATER MARKm m ROCK GUIDE RAILNCMARKAinr ENGH MARKMAIL 5ET,IN POLE u 61 NAIL 5ET,INPOLE :ECFV: 20.00 gyCc - ELEV. = 1.00 SITE PLAN - t SCALE: ' 1' 60',0' - - RA C 1I10 "F .. '+in' r'FF''t'r�'sr f Y 'r n + �� r ,i ,,tir ' ,P _"r + _ _ - - -- .. _ • , �^ y !:• ,0. E' }, y . n }} n . QZW2xh QHZZZ�j 4gZw�mw0 U1 FWLQ.6QZWy4 LLQxr '<l- =QLLl "i-Oj ONp<�Nwz ' NFNVIFWSOO - -�OO,-O KD i�iOZgZWLLIL r-a OZWdO¢m01U RzwlO UOFwppzOW W�xFO KVO OJ Ow Nprs 11-- Nmtt¢W z r WrWU� ZJ � -0• O - \ OVERALL DIME OF OVAL SHAPE / Ir / a \ \� EXTENTS OF EX15TNG REMOVE . EMOVEBUILDINGS TO BE ��\ I RD GENERAL ESERVATIONS MANAGE ACCT. - I I CEPTION OFFICE O J PA O O ` OFFICE LL w o1Fr sraP 4 U 1 p ;LOBBY — - - -- -- - -- -- --- Z — O O � wA3 J z 0 o o I = gip ° o o � _ / a Q } 0 0 o KITCHEN RST RA a- a = O ° o \ / AREA U) O c0 co 1 I _ is L- ,. ONSENIOH °o° - 0) - G o 0 WAITING ES AR_Ep_A / \ cA y a W p ONSEN II o° REFLECTING \ o - L - o POOL \, ..i 'i U_ ' i in ,o " � It 00 EE0 oa I I I O I SPA Qlc��m `0, Q - GoLL i V \ ' N >2 O Nv I V I Z o L. O0 cd U W III , GROUND FLR PLAN +; -5 A-1�8 5CALE 1/16' = 1'-0' �( 1 (r U . Z9 N � L O� - - DRAWING N0,_ r +' , I� I 4 _ ZOWVI Qnq WWmmolK _ 00 �¢W�3[J�Wd - ¢Cwyo� OILlo) j_Zr JZFW TQTm 7<S - UIfWII EW R'U O4V--Wa.z •- - - ZWazN i- 200 00- -K' rc' Q w 0 0 o m isK 00088m ow WW OJ-UU Ill wo � L¢Sn"�¢W zZ . SNKC� OJW.f-o<ow ` I� 0' OVERALL OF OVAL 5"FE L j j Z \ - - EXTENTS OF EXISTING r - ,- - _ - - - - - - - j &JILTO BE REMOVED- - jI V I RM. RM. I I 0 201 202 RM. cc Wj 203 M. 1 A O J W �� JI 304 / RM. A LL W Z 205 0 U 2 - - - - j OPEN BELOW\ O JAN. 0J zo w g w- / \ RM. I =GE / RM.206 � O Q p 226IL Q \ \ Q 0_ \ 20 � � � � RM. A a 25O \�T I I o \ RM. I p o RMT - - - - -3'fTE SUffE 208 \ I I o O 3 224 Z o 0 oPaa TO RM. m a \BELOWQ o 209 1 w J 3 z RM. v a 2231 m 2231 I� I \ REFLECTING RM.IV A� POOL s 222 BELOW u `a RM. v 3 _ 211 . ' .o RM. O. 2N RM. - 212 - I I RM. �60, 220Ott > RM. -77 213 F z 6 = �\ RM. j j �lfj� SSP - ' RM. jj RM. 215 RM. I 219 216 Q RM. RM. \ I I I 218 217 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o v jI z o SECOND FLR PLAN 1 O 4-) t _ -1.lb SCALE: I/16' - I'-0' o N N om V m ! � U Z4-4 m DRAWING NO.:, " A-11b ( � - - - Z.awur Uooxwwrc <i-O> IL VI2oo4<O _ Q�FiIL JZ�LL�N YZzI ' - Nvi¢tt�i SOY�YIn l�6 Zi..aww NF:.yF-W<Y oo WIWUJ ZJwZZ o 1-?<a3 UATZFOO 112'-0' 20'-0' 20'_0 20-0 20 0 20 0 6-0 100'-6' a Z e Z wcr N J V -5 (L 3 Z OC U z 00 0- STOR. J F— Z / mU_ w3 WOMEN'S O Q FO ROOM J o �— _ _ � O zo Q � w o� Q - _ MOVEABLE PARTITICN5 00 co co TYPICAL KITCHEN PLATFORM MEETING AREA ROOM N $ ~ ro 0 t4 az a z - z MEN'S ROOMul - Q ; m' Z STOR v I ; IL O ° /N 0 HALLWAY cl y6o low- < W o � DECK 0 Y t0 0 Zw 1.V GROUND FLR PLAN o m SCALE: 1/4' V-0' ON O � FDRA;WING NO.: -1.2a Ifs �'. - _ _ - ; • . FEW a ywwrc?�6I� N2zZN20QmCyUNjQd'Z¢Zw F-w 01-00w��oz�",W ZZNmQ�pwQ�Z m fAl - 7 b. C 0 *' r' - 6'-0' 0 O, z s S e — 7 f O Z O U` , __ - :n- --— ----- -- - -- - - —__— 2 -- -- - -- - 5 J F- z In - - - - - - V Oo - Z Q o�Tv a ¢O � SLEE NG UN OW D SLEE NG UN z AREA 420 z EF7NG NIT #O O W O rO AREA 420 O ❑ e — ❑ O 1 A A - 420 SO.FT. J /� Q o - 65 /R�V OX8 — SLEE ING # SLEE ING I PLAT CL. SLEEPING t.' PLAT CL. - - - - JP TFORM p - TATA I MAT CL. p� TATA I MAT TAI AMI MAT Z 3 FRIG z W FRIG — -- REFRI a v m o N o 0 — — IN : B BTR - 2 - �, I HR M " -m I 4 I nl CL. ) CL .0 CL �. O 0 0 N DC AE - 97 S . fie, _ Q vQJtt o"7 x, 07 Ow a Z r p 0 4 i 15'_0' 22,_6. C 1 w N r N �1 I N Y (0 1��11 O Y T� - , GROUND FLR PLAN o CCS �. -N O v m � - E N rD� �v _ DRAWING NO.: A-1.3a ly ' 4 c9w ��2wo�0 rw Ny QZ > - - V1N WEU S�zml-UIJK , � goozw nzzwgioo f- l * drzn�a a2�wo3ZN d LINE OF ROOF ABOvE 60'-0' b' 0' 6' �. 151_01 151-01 m — — — — — — — — — — — U w ° J w H � U z 20 o co LL CO w 3 Tv N Z 0 0 g o o o� w O = °: O - -_ - - - - - - - - _- - � W q o, p_ I CA H I C� co Y IS EPI NIT b SLEEPI UNrf p ❑ O A A = 42 SOFT. AREA = 420 SO. p El2 O }� e ts TF SLEEPING SLEEPING I I Q CL I PUTFORM PLATFORM CL. L�TJJ L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAl AMI MAT TATAAAI MAT � Z .o I g co m N w < REFRI �� — -� FRIG a m o __ o o o INr HR M AH — M - - IN . Q W .} / 3 - V , z \ V CL. - - U 11 CD 0 �_ CL. � , -`::3; FNa D C A E - D C A \ O e n Z LL ' n � Q m� ZW SECOND FLR PLAN o � o - lb SCALE: 1/4' 1'-0' cd v a 4-) m N O N C Z t0 Qv - - ,DRAWING NO.:, A-1.3b _ - Zowtn .�Oo9x wwz Z/nW�U r: o rYOioa 4iai-a . oZ OpSwa3moU n - i - =z�rc=' oJ,g iCo oa orc F-ata UQ�¢W Z�UO ' e x / % b rhi. '/. b b '/r b % b h x % k - •/ b F Q Q -.J F ,-FF A '4 9 b C ELIEVATION ,CALF vlb' = r-m' ¢ z° (n ill J w A , 0[x ArF x _ - > U b HM 'FJ UF r1 . .x '/r 'F '/r x '/r 'F k k 'F / W r '2 r % 'A r 'F 'F rii 'f 'F Fx col JZO � Ugo Q 211 w 0 a- X ad 2 (1) W ELEVATION -3.1a $CALE: Ab' = r-0' ' D Z 3 Li a z z 2 F - 9 9 a 3 �2 EMS . h k/ Fn J _a ' \ ELEVATION C)J r W o� 0 4 ' 3 d� � ., x , 20. '3.1a SCALE: m m 0-4 L It � m I N � 1N0 rr. /D 3 N . Z Q C� 0 A - -1-11-1114 C�.. W � O � EN � L ' Z N N a ELEVATION DRAWING NO.: $CALE,: 1/Ib' I'-0' . A-3.1a Q2SN ��Jwrcm20�- ' 7 � Z Za=W UIFNO VO00 Q� (L�aFa aZw��amow , _ w rOWwo3 ow Wjwc~.�m Kjpp�oZ�w 00 00 00 _ 0 m N z° D Cl) w O W w U OQ w FRONT ELEVATION F5 W U f�= '3.2 SCALE' I/8' = 1'-0' w F L m DZO O_ ~ wW c O ,, O Q W X Qa ' .O W 0 co ..v —4} o f t z 3 N w a3 9 v ar U, - v 7'w LL' 2 SIDE ELEVATION ° SCALE: I/8' I'-0' T l Zx T p \� 4-) o m I • •� � N o � - - - DRAWING NO.: _ ti : A-3.2a = - -.r - Zowm X099 x.wwm - ., <a�z ZwLL mmxo� a wu awwn. az5 <zlox�ai r - zmw�w w�?m awz . - Q"do z_o -mq�zz zw4, - a""a�ua, Oz M,io3m oc�i O 00 00 O www zDDmaoo ujm m m • Q 9 pp Z F- H F- F] EE FIH ru O J 11 H z ~ U Z O Jzo cc O0O REAR ELEVATION 2 SIDE ELEVATION w w a r -33 SCALE: I/4' = I'-O' -33 SCALE: 1/4' - I'-O' J X Q cnw cn NQ , O 00 00 ° t — -- - - - - z 3 0 �- � m a Lij Q d z O O 00 00 _ - ,Z EH = o IF a a REAR ELEVATION SCALE ve' = r-O• rN Nm eN N - - - O 00 go OH.LL 8 O — Z 0 1O e rn '_rrlfT_�11 v- I IN 3 FRONT ELEVATION - N � . U o� Z N M A SCALE: 1/4' - I'-O' f+y Oz r DRAWING NO.: - s FRONT ELEVATION -3.3 SCALE: 1/8' = 1' J- A-33aj- Z�WN }QOOyW WK Q<lZ ZWLLp.m20'r U � 1 LLW d'QK�O�Ow JflI m-om YN ZF Z�- ON �I NNW�w 20zmYN6_¢Z Z00ZN NFNZCFZO oO g ¢-o m❑lo<ow 1- 144- ^ dzara FOZmw Imow OVERALL I w�i Fw ¢OU rc�o0� � Dlhi&OF OV im , DmZ¢W w AL SHAPE I Svc-i�¢� 0 66 1 aom I-?¢¢3 OQE¢LL ORO � \ a `—PRIVATE MARINA BULKHEAD Q M N W WALKWAY Q 0 co Z m U -g 03 RETAINING WALL S 3 0 r3 aa" mW ELLzssWO O a-3. EXTENTS OF EXISTING W Q � F m BUILDINGS TO BE STAIRS O (L O Z Q r= WUJI W Z � 2 (@A Uwo N Z L0 (O n m 0) Try TM \ \ LINE OF ROOF LINE OF ROOF I TM \ \ OVERHANG TM _ O \ O \\ \ OVERHANG _ _ — — — _ __ O WATERFALL CATCH POOL / I t.\ �I ' m O/ Om Oo �.q O WATERFALL WALL \ m Oo W o G �(J \\ I I J J O ° 18 ,0 o (B A I W U >_ TM o L o U- Cn w z O O - z Jgo N ®fAWJR -' ORiCEI - I P� r O wo PAW w Q Q Qaz II Er 0 So MAM Q �AM 0 cn r ts ° 4 ❑ tJa OF � III W \ ❑ cri r O 3 `POOL PATIO pI a 3 I I — _ O I I I O a m i o N I p �.cclxo PaaL O If w z z 4 r "I-' a a mm \ J I o o LOW WALL I C? G b I SEA-nNG BREAKDOWN 3�yD _ 1_ < a c�LL R RAU n / (p PUBLIC RESTAURANT SEATING 17 SEATS � TM TRANSIENT MOTEL CAFETERIA SEATING 103 SEATS / Cl BAR 10 SEATS l KEY PLAN LOADING AREA---\ 0 iN ' z V -W C WALKWAY CURB $ O T y ° `PARKING AREA� (� I ) o GROUND FLR PLAN Aa-1.1 SCALE: 1/16" = I'-0" Aa-1.1 t0 O � lmlI�LfI--I f1 —S DRAWING NO.: - Aa-1 .1 jZaw�n Ow�y'wwrc Qalz �zwLLrrmx�� 3llwm �O}O U'W -M WR aWrZj JZr OVI Ii Q1 W lA"-'RV ZOZm�NJ ZWRN fA -viz F'100 QOdHd �Owfa/1�¢m 0 w 0UOw¢o3W O r,�-Q�Z N�rzm ¢ NwmQ¢wmz 0 ME mZ�UO NN fG a O m N m U � ro U W —Z m � g mo �c3W¢ � 0 0J � ILrz0 z ¢ x IZa— m 00 nOi NW F— F JW Z zOmnm M ROOM RCOM 208 20a ROOM ROOM / 210 / 207 e / z W Y ir J J O / 0 IL W crIt \ r MECH o�� o ~ O Z STORA Op o O O UQj H oo G J Fo OPEN TO, I— LL w F BELOW \\ STROOM O NSEN I Z _I SfOR \\ LLI O J co \\ o z = QD 22 SERVICES \\ LOCKER o o w Q O o C5 F � RE � O i RML ° 00 224 SURE SURE O 000 P W 0 1 2 00 00 4 F ° RM RM Z 926 227 // 00 O 0 O � m F STOR oo a Q o a w ¢ z a Q V m - o o 0 o ONSEN II w RM REFLECTING I �� L 222 POOL U BELOW RAA. a ° Of o a 2221 o O ; / RM o 212 RIA G� 220 0 o��mis bp> IM Qo a 3 .. ZpEL 20' O RA O CP��Ppo r O (J o 21g ° o RIA RA o 215 O `1c0 O ii 216217 C500 0 QODo D o COO o iw OO O 3 in 0— L) —r , Z- 0 c O � 0 I CIO � +-) 4-) U O U m 1 SECOND FLR PLAN t I SCALE: 1/I6" = P-m" m O y� DRAWING NO.: Aa-1.2 Q<lZ TiOoa�mSor ¢rz �ZwLLo r¢� wwow wQLL 3� wa QU Wci J 0 O -UUW JZI�t'-2 YVI .ZZn az,wY�N ¢_ (/1.Ewo S02m FlA JQ R'Z azw NHNU200 o -U ¢zzoiF¢z W"r dza�a �Z�wo3mow WKF w �0rc�o0- i- UI� tm FOm<¢w ttz m ¢ SN¢¢= OJ¢Wzti00Q0� H�QQ3 UQM¢LLZEUO � aF N uu�� m U U (ag U) z z Ir \ E E z QE m gzz0 z a w wm z dm fn (� O N zU) +or. m rn i J °C Z 0 J Q % 3 o � o o Z O JZD wIL Oco J �o z 0 = CcO a D a ac a z --- �Q C13 Z 3 p I co m N ,; Q z z w J o U ° J O 3 2 -%oo Q Qa W Od o' LL 6 ?o Q T, '� 00 r � gym" O tion 0 rm r , z _w c I � c� � U o O � v m THIRD FLOOR PLAN +, ; SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" (�� I• z �O O N DRAWING NO.: Aa-1 .3 r0 w¢ F—�0-2--,- mzl0, ZQJQZ N SQ� pJ�"~NzPcwj2ooMAX.BLDG.HGHT. w¢ozo —PER W�iFw a0�Wo3 0� wE ozow EL +45IDB' - W�Fzm �mQ¢w�z =Iwo, o�s5z�oao� F-Q¢3 UQEQwZfUO ROOF DECK 3 a EL..3TID8' v7w �$ - - - 1 O o SECOND FLOOR - EL. +25ID8' N J Q co GROUND FLOOR fA QZ O EL .IBIDB' - - �J O w ?, J Q AVERAGE EXISTING fil NA'NRAL GRADE Z C EL.! .. WATERFALL F m WATEFFALL CA7CH BA51N CS ir EVEL NORTH ELEVATION - ENTRANCE w W o EL 0D0' �\ U 0 N a-3.1 SCALE; 1/16" P-0" Z O MAX BLDG.HGHT. PER ZONING r^ EL. +45ID8' V J ,` ROCF DECK B Z W Q 0 � O Q a W 0 w EL OW U z SECOND FLOOR - - - - - Y +25IDB' Q W Q F- o W 0z0 GROUND FLOOR O AVERAGE EXISTING Oz co NA-m GRADE _ Z W cr LLO Q F- Q � z SEA LEVEL WATER LINE X d 3 ELOID°' BULKHEAD SOUTH ELEVATION - PRIVATE CAFETERIA DINING HALL (PRIVATE RESTAURANT) ~ W ROCK REVETMENT SOUTH o 2 a-3.1 SCALE; 1/16" = 1'-0" 0.a ci z 3 0 O (n m N MAX.BLDG.HGHT. 4i Q z oz A PER ZONING EL. 45.08' ROOF DECK _ � F W 6 BECOND FLOOR EL +25ID8' ' D _ O A ✓ n }y 9 �` O+P J `o h_. .l 0 -FT-T, - G F - v ROUND 00 L R s EL NANRALEGRADE� EL +658' �1 SEA LEVEL WATER LME Q ¢� Y EL.0ID0' BULKHEAD EAST ELEVATION - PRIVATE MARINA WATERFALL o ROCK REVETMENT +3 WATERFALL CATCH BASIN d� �4T �,� a-3.1 SCALE; I/16" = I'-0" DRAWING KEY o I 3 s � MAX BLDG.HGHT. r , zv -0- PER ZONING EL.+45ID8' O I N O 21 �� f� ROOF DECK 9 v EL+25ID8' r' � 31 ro m U 9 0 4-) / > V/ m GROUND FLOOR - - - 4-) 'o EL-IOM' - 0 - mN AVERAGE EXISTMG � U s cmo NATURAL GRADE • 8-3. 4� a N EL +658' N p BEA LEVEL 4 WEST ELEVATION - PARKING LOT EL.02 DRAWING NO.: SCALE; I/16" = I'-0" Aa-3.1 Z<lZ W.1w }app Ym'y OF- <Z JF¢K �� ?Q-LL3��wa �'UOWU WQ Q QwZUF <0z-OTI/IOQI S��m FI/JK Zli0 ulH 'moo 'WI gO��NO ��Z�Q'WIO OZ wrno Qm w'U wwOa UOw¢OOZ�w WsxFw aa,05 '<"Z =UttfY= OJWztiO�Ow I-�QQ3 UQ�¢IiZ�UO 'S. S $ o O 1 v ? Z ¢ CI O O ir m m i (3 LU 0z V O° CO 48.-0.. < 0 F h a O Uw W Z a m Q, LL Z CI CI W m 4-0` _ 'dog = � wCS oOw ¢ ¢ z 6y.. y.. V. ¢ ¢ Q CA 2 = � O 3'-6" 13'-0" 13'-0" 13'-0" 31-611 p Z N M -cr In (D D) SCREEN PARTITION SCREEN PARTITION z coW Y Z X : O 9 U w zO v FJ f= O W W Q Ono ❑ \ \/ J O0LL LL p SLEEPING UNIT 8 z0 r IL O N UNIT # z AREA = 396 SO.FT._I Y z I SLEEPING UNfi # WO a Z �pR� - 396 SO. O O ❑ I AREA = 396 SOFT. > Q 2 O I_J O ❑ ❑ O e LL C5 C� to I- e s m I SLEEPING I I 3. I SLEEPING LE BED PLATFORM I CL. 1 0 ❑ CL. -------- - CL. I PLATFORM w r -------- p Z �' o FRIG w Q z (� EFRIG � REFRI � a � o 0 I� SITZ i II�K B R O U ATR ; Z - 2 - 2 d' v z O CL. '-o z U t a F _ ,p ❑ _ CL. CL _ C N o P. 6 `b `LOO Q�PS D ° A E = 6 S Q Z � a � LL � N KEY PLAN N Q 3 � v� ' Z v _IQi 1 GROUND FLR PLAN Ab-1.1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Ab 1.1 o � � U o U p Nip Ov 174b NO.: -1 .1 Gr \/@tel d\/ : w //2m y) �& :% d \ \ �/ \ a § \ w � ® ■ ) mac § m � «\ § § 2 § d2 / 00mm P09 LINE »DECK, rFLOOR BELOW m2 § SSSco LINE OF WALL , eFLOOR a= Q REL 2 cc } § ) � § 0L2 a « ��mn 0n 0- § o e � Rw � § [ k � Q < e = = < ON ) mco -t U) (o , m q y 2 cr \ ] Ui kz / O !5q ca LL W O � � z \ ) ` k � � a , O � w . 2 % # _ § 7 § cri .. )\ \ \ ) } \ o : Q ! / ) _ �� ¥ # � Q wo 0 ROOF PLAN - I ` SCALE: + _ � � - � � � g 4-) c O 4-) - � � DRAWING NO.: � Ab—] .3 Z<lZ �pooy wm2oF lw Wa,>U>OWQ, W��i J¢4WR aW�Zj JZ�OUNOQZ iOzm-NJ 00 �F v ,0=2O � �_O h'�20QZW r dZdUd 00.ID�mOw W�2fW-m a��pOpZ qtr'-2 r �mQQW�z OJ�.Sz,OQO, UQE<mzZ ouO z ZO gY °zQ co -i d IM �" Vaz � o ccIrmm � 290 0 mm FMUUUQ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - o 0 U a zF m o LL z0 OW m 0 0 w Q Q Z F-IF] HR PP FIR0LLI Q m2 S Q N e m Z N C'J 7 W) f0 m I I cf) Z W �— O U o If 11 1 1 1111 if Q > U z -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - Z J F- O � W W Jz � I ry J Oma ° a j co I . 2 LL rL_______________________________ ___________ _ ___ __ ___ __ -------------------- ---- v rL_________________________________-________\- 13REAWAY —_-________________-__1J W Q L______________ ________________________-______ ___J L-------------------------------------------------- --------________- _- ______J — CL REAR ELEVATION BREAKAWAYFCUNDATICN5A5SIDE ELEVATION ELEVATION co PER DEC.REQUIREMENTS. PERDEC. FOUNDATIONS AS TYPICAL ALL SIDES PER DLL.SID EMENTS. b-3] SCALE: 4" = I'-0" b41 SCALE: 4" = I'-0" TYPICAL ALL SIDES cri o z 3 m a Q d z w z a m o 0 0 a, w J `o K v U U J o F/ I fli O 3 B z Q 4 O LL ub 0 a O s /eJ m N 0 4P } � tiQa Qi C� �-1 -F-) o 4 U o O +-) 0 m 1• •� � N 00 I I N L______ __________________________ J M J Ftp s FRONT ELEVATION BREAKAWAY FOUNDATIONS AS DRAWING NO.: PER DEC.REQUIREMENT5. 1 b-3. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" TYPICAL ALL SIDES Ab-3. 1 ZOwN �OOO y.'mW 01- aQlw �Q�LLow�rc¢ -owo wo3Qowa Q �zj JZ�wmNW¢s UINmKU S Zm�NW K2 ZwaW0 NF_ Umeo gO�ZU K�zUQZwwr atidFK 0Zm d'U wWUa 50 W2Q00Z0, Wei mw QU¢ o- -., m N¢ 6 INKR'� 0<5 M2_000K UQ�¢WzmUo rg Gs9 ;-j o N z O IQ z Q I— a 1 [U= U az Z O CJ3s ¢ m oC7W000m 65 o co 45-0„ d) 0 zzF � m 0 LL z o CI W m 41'-m" '� p g = _ m 0 j p O W Q Q Z . y.. y.. y.. CL ¢ Q COM 2 Q N y. 3.-6.. I3•-0I5_00 � 5. b.. 0 z N co V' N f0 O> 5CREEN PARTITION SCREEN PARTITION y U) Z zQ J Q � � U o a � W N Z0 U z U W OJ �= o W LL owe � Q O J0 ❑❑ 0 W 2 � LL ❑ V SLEEPING UNIT 1k O O W O E N UNfT M Z AREA = 396 SO.FT._I Y z I SLEEPING UNIT 8 O Q }a z Aub 1 AREA = 396 SOFT. _ Q = 0 R 396 SO. .0 O ❑ O ❑ ❑ 0 o h � co SLEEPING I Ir3• I SLEEPING LE BED CL PLATFORM J CL CL I PLATFORM W ❑ L p 8 o r z 3 F5 co�n s CA m .. N FRIG W J Q z 0 EFRIG �❑ REFRI � o N o ° I� T R Slly ' s 1y B IiR0O r U ; � v z O CL. 2 U F ❑ CL. CL. ❑ ~ J Q O 3 0 B a DC A E 68 S . Q` �QQ �l0 00 IT•-6.. 13•-0 1T•-b.. do � m rn KEY PLAN 0 � I � m — - Tl - r z a 1 GROUND FLR PLAN , - I o Ac 1.1 SCALE: 1/4" = P-0" 1 Ao-1.1 I F-- Cd � U o �— a . .r m � -I.-) rl Z N M1 �J• b 1�1 V N p m O � DRAWING NO.: Ac-1.1 #; Qq/9\ ƒ qƒG// z ww2g y(ƒ &q(/ / f Z \twq`\(d }/ © mm Gm § \ § § ) ) � ) z cohe � \ " § 0 IrIrm oM0 0:> ez � 000co LINE ��mz / \ } � kj � �/ az @ & W � � § � z ) § § § m ± [ § « « < m ) mcoIT V) (D , I � 2 q � � © � � § 2 f CL U § -i < 0) ® % CID —jW LL � j , W = o cc O Q / z ` a - - � u ( § ® k \ E3 \ � z } j LL It 11-11-1-11 u : Q f � ) { C) 9 � « . « Q a J S / ROOF PLAN ® O - I ` �2 SCALE: + _ V-0-- d � - � � � g � g O - � � � DRAWING Ac—].2 azir �Oo9yww¢ ¢ z ¢ZLLLLomr¢� WwWw w¢ 3 wa ¢WFZJ QZ~w0��z 11-0 m to Z� �`w UI I- mw¢OZ 5�&�0 �ozo�zw a'zaum FOZ�wo3mow w O o0 W�iFw C) OZ'- =ziro o�Qwz�oo¢a� U¢�QILLZ�UO m g Cl p s m o O C p l.-a � a lL Y Q Z Z co w t mo- EC Ir IM ^ a W 0 0 0 M g F 0 V Z p � � O 0 A ogoowm oma a > o o as a z m Q ¢ pQ fA Z 2 < N O 2 N W V' O 2'-W" 0, r^ Z W Y U z WW H o ca 0 —dao O_ rL O J co ------------ ---------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- ------ ----- - --------------- ----------- -- ------- ----------J r 717 In W W 1 :5 o REAR ELEVATION 2 SIDE ELEVATION = x a z 1 PERBREDEC.REQUIREMENTS.FOIA5 BREAKAWAY FOLNDATICN5 AS d = p c 3.1 SCALE: I/4" = I'-0" PER DE . LLSIDES c`3.1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PER DEC.REQUIREMENTS. � W V co H TYPICAL ALL SIDES TYPICAL ALL SIDES W a H O Z 3 O p� m c.1 Q z o w z Q U K 0 O N O O W J O U U U J O O 2 m CJS n $ 0U) �d�bbM 20 1 e z ° O T N O co a 4-) U — Q1�' 0 I r e 4-) L I V I Z ry 1•'7 � FRONT ELEVATION BREACAWAY F"DATIONS AS DRAWING NO.: c 3.1 SCALE= 1/4" = I'-0" PER DEC.REQUIREMENTS. TYPICAL ALL 51DE5 Ac-3.1- ZlZ �poorww¢ Q¢tz �ZwLLomFor WwLL� wQ '- 3� wa U} > O K w <> QZ'- ow ZZ- N V'wLLW xOzmina mz go Zw mFmz��z oo awW�d D�WpaomaJ W1IFw 6Urc 0�—Q(� m 0¢,2 � �mzQwmz =m¢¢w 0J�mr04om HZQQ3 0Q ,E ZEUO I 2 6 0 � � �O._0.. z .. 6•_3.. 2P_6�� 21,_6.. ZI._6.. D) Z Q 4'_2 RAMP FFJ 21._6.1 6._S.. (p 0 D w F a � 00mNm a zLU UUU m m F 0H O S 10 qk wo wInFZFit LL z0 D W z p a oOgZF F� wam g J 0 0In 2 . I1QJ rm Ir �Q !I1 2 S Q co N d Y'- •• 2 W R Lo 0 n 0 D n I STOR. e x — — _ — _ — — _ _ W e zZ POWDER Q Q _._I I I WOMEN'S a ROOM 9._0.. J U O w °C v z O TRANSIENT MOTEL ANNEX - MOVEABLE PARTITIONS TTPICAL JO O 45-99 SEATS PROVIDED e o ~ (n w S O i PLATFORM e o N Z RAMP . a d 3. W Q 0 z � _ Im0 MEN'S a I Q O a Z ROOM Q = O � co I — ® ® STOR. a p a F D m Z 3 HALLWAY o I I Y L.i a 3 — — o N o 10 1m o - E W J O N U m F w J O Q 3 3 = 0 C1 a o LL yo � o o GROUND FLR PLAN KEY PLAN 2 f � ACJ 1] SCALE: 3/16" = I'-0" 111111_ X02 ?•i o r 0 2� N •V 1 D a Ad-1.1 � ♦ O ty v p r I l oN Z N IIMI N �1 Nip m 0 , _ DRAWING NO.: Ad-1 .1 Z<lZ 4.�DOYW W¢ Q¢t-Z ZW_w¢m SOF- ¢K 0,02 wQ"w3�wwn JZ, ow�>-m W1-Zj JW UI W,m mmmrc0 zOzm�mJo goozo m50l,w2 O ¢ o rcOz Oo¢zwwF awwoa o0w¢mOz0, � W�iFw ¢U¢ o�-Uw =mitt-' OJ nw'o QO¢ FT¢Q3 UQm¢LLZfoo N '$ ON' 5s '$@ 4 p ld N N N ¢ N 0 i S O 0 Y za o ao o w K o o o 3 a In a W 0 0 0 n z � U U U Sw cri 0 � ziuCC 170'-m" O U W W F S O LINE OF DECK BELOW LL z In In E z m I INFO or LU W co Q Q co S M.< co N O z C7 V In (D n Of I W Z a W le 0 J w H U z O U o ZJ Jz =) w � OU - z - _ � cro a 0 a , z aY z x0 Q = o a fA-------- w z J J MCI o Z 3 0 ` mm N Q z o i:i QQ z Q U K m LL W J p` N U U ° J O 2 �y J 1 O wm m s � ROOF PLAN � o e d-1. SCALE: 3/16" , I'-m" c / T J O � 0 • •M4 m n E N Nw m al U 0 1 ° N M zm � � N tD � O w DRAWING NO.: Ad-1.2 Zawm �pooyww¢ Q¢IZ �ZwLLomi¢tt Toown jQWo3QLLwa Qw -Z' - Zl4 WU -Z Ul rn E'D ipzm�u��¢z a 0�Zlw/1 NI-41z2U200 JJ ¢ O ¢p2�62w H aFaF¢ OZwN�<m�U UOw¢OOZOw Www Ww QU¢ 0-�-L�0 .mzaw z in a f F?¢¢3 0Q�a�-zoo g g s o o Z 0 co � a of213 It � � O W Q o m N z mU U U rn �a � OUW W FFO m LL z D O W Z m .0LumgZ mSkWUl o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D= Q 65 2 2 Q rn N ILI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ o Z co V Lf) co N m- 0 X Z ZZ W Y QO U o JH 3 FRONT ELEVATION > v z 1 Ow d-3.1 SCALE: Iva" = r-m^ J W co = W X Jz � OffCl) Cl) W 2CEO Q f— Q r z cr XQ = 0 I— W C3 c w z 3 0 co m N a o z 3 w Q ¢ m m a 0 o 0 W J O � v 7i Z s U o a J O N Z > r Q LL Com\ b Y' SIDE ELEVATION ;MMI 2 �o o d-3.1 SCALE: 1/8" MI. J; m ro O0— L) zx c i O T \ ^O' O I.1 •d I/1 o O m J � N Irr••!1 O t0 00 U YI � o0 MN m N m � 0 N DRAWING NO.: Ad-3.1 ZZI" }�poyw WK 1 aalz 1I��z41LL KmFx�lr 9-3. j QrZ< Z >�O�yWWR IIm�1ZW W_¢mF¢¢ QLLwOJ ¢Q WUW� j 3JWwa Q�}}O U' O V1F�ptOZy WFZ� aZ V1W Q2 No �ZmZWQM, QOO,� m~m2F-CW1200 J R O llzZOQZwWti d aha 100 �Hmm0 O UEpOOZOW Njl=-=m �U�wZJ 6w ¢O =wKKJ OJW 1-¢OZZ F z6Q� OQE¢I�ipZ�0Ut0pO N O p i7 N O 0 J lviift RETAINING WALL Q Z EARTHEN BEAM W O O O Z m U U U g co p � F za s0- Q FINISH FLOOR OZ Q Q jFj W O m EL.10ID0' O g g ~ W �' Z L r — - _ - _ _ ._ _ 0) W 2 2 UD N - - - - - - - - - - - - -- — - - - - - - --- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- � N _ W W 7W p O Z 'At U) w aD O1 a EAST ELEV. g-3.1 SCALE: 1/8" = I'-0" Z W Y O U o Q w > U Z w U CA W H o Qcr- _j Z :3 20 O -J ° J W = � O FINISH FLOOR - FINISH FLOOR - -� O r Z EL 10ID0' _ - - ._ W /a/te� O EL.I0ID0' o V co H WEST ELEV.—PARKING LOT NORTH ELEV. o m ` N 9-3.1 SCALE: 1/0" = r-0° g-3.1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1 -0" w a 3 z Z Q U m O N O W 1 a c v U z U o J `o Q 3 `J Q r a O FINISH FLOOR EL.10.00' m N sm — — — — v..J O 0 SOUTH ELEV.—ENTRY I g-3.1 SCALE: I/8" = I'-0" c� � U o O U m � •P'I N � on U I C Z N M C N m O � DRAWING NO.: Ag-3.1 ZZ }QppJyW WK QQrla_ZWw¢mZOF Ww1>>iW WQLL"3J~WR QWF-Z� QZ�opUlOQS 1/IN�KU SOZm�NJ 00 Z. N� zoo S O SOZOQZWLL� aurao0wwo¢m¢o z rUW�opzow �¢'-'zm z vwimaaW qwz ¢� o��p�omaom F�Q¢3 UQ�¢wZ�UO fC 0 N p o O ? z ~Z a m x m: M W FINISH FLOOR U U U �g O EL. 1450' - IL Ir U W W z s 2 Q ` zo D w ¢ E m FINISH FLOOR - - - - - -- - -- - - - --- - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - EL.13.00' - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ._ - J - - -- - - - - - - - - - TI- -I W QQ Q ZF L - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -. - - - - - -- - -I I __ J N H W W F JW Z L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -r- - - - - Ll - - � Q CA 2' 2 Q 0 N O z It to O m O WEST ELEV.-PARKING LOT 0 h-3.1 SCALE: 1/8" = I'-0" }m JZ W PO U o � Q W + > U z U � U � z ~ z co w W O Q co F Z W = ir0 Q I OX 0 eIM FINISH FLOOR — m ^ Z O EL 1450' O N 1 w Q z o FINISH FLOOR C- - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - ] — — — o u�i o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ 3 ti a ¢ m EL.9mm' III I L _ U � a U i 2 SOUTH ELEV.-ENTRY 3 NORTH ELEV. P h-9.1 SCALE: SCALE: 1/5 ; LL rc O ooh ti a m Y O -T - - -- - - - - - __ - - tin =2� iio z x I a - L)I I � FINISH FLOOR EL.1450' - - -l. - - - - - - -- __ - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - FINISH FLOOR - - - - - - - -- - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - EL.5.00' - - - - - - - - - - - - - L O 4-) 0 m a EAST ELEV. +' � U Z N h-3.1 SCALE: I/8" = 1'-0" h+i o n DRAWING NO.: Ah-3.1 fD 6 ., ZOWf/I p0g.j'W WK (4f N � a¢�Z �Zww¢mS¢K Wwwwpp wQ�z3w~wa MIS xU>O>C1W LM-XR . 0 -,ow /� 6 D 6 y m z Wf s SDzmFVI-w1� C.r-r Q n Z4O-�''W NF 411-wSpZO L ttJJ e go0?o mp~OQzW - Q z O.la1-a oZLziw Dam¢U o Z 0 1¢¢- W O�+ uj N Wj2tim KO�wOpz<W We: x 1- VDjOQQW 2 STONE: JI � . � m g S 8 g Q R o S1 R iso o ,� Lof 4 \ GILLETTE DRIVE w µI � �• p — — — U U �z � TD a O ZONE R40 Subdiwsbn - Map Of 'Marion Manor' SulfF-olk County a No. 2038 W FZ ¢ O O Lot7 L 18 5 � :1 LU '2 Q Lot 9 Lot B R n r(n,.,,`- �tl,��%;'�� r:.s. .ti:v Lot 10 now or fo merry W rH Lot 5 ham,.,. ,z." _ ==< >-.. now or formerly now or formerly now or formerly Robert F.M&+Nancy Y.Muir > �-p �'� - `,l- V ~�- -� Gene O.Welker 1- Barbara Wlagel now or formerly N a 2 Q U) U O N m ohn Menoglu+ w GRA55 PAVERS Joseph Llociardi+ fly Manoglu Heather J.C.Walker m N GRASS PAVERS I -7 LAND-BANK REQUIRE ARKING J Catherine E.Pino I W ROOK JETTY Z IA 10 ^ 0e O 0 o PARKING SPACE FOR 3 R i 5 DENGES U 5LIDING GATE ry a (SPEAKER 8 ?OUCH PAD OPERATED) 871.59 — w S382200'E '_�-t-'- + + w I + + + + + + w W y w + + + # r : :dT%: + + w W } + 1\ _ W W W W W W _—_—_— -------- _____ FIRE HYDRANT W WWW WIW W W W -- WW W Y - - - - - - -- — wy yWyW U O + + + + + PA E + + + „ V W W W W w W .JI W W w W W 0; °r,L W W _� mR� ., w w w W y50�(0W'° y W + 9�OEA�,�pSE w W w V Z w WWW W w w W W W W W w W W oa0 w � W W +w w W yW �, WyWy yWy WWW NG a -' g0 o O y W W W w TIE LINE AL APPROX. J M W w w W w HIGW H ATER INE 'L W y �W yW w wW WW W wW ww WW c U� a' M� 0 1 Z GRA55 PAVERS OX T 1 + � � I QO r �M� .Lrt'.'?' rr� �_ .. _- I + � w W WWW w W W w E'XI5TING"LAKDSWGA�INGWTOw w W W W w w O \ st»:+ 19G w `REIeIAIf� b � � �I_' Go � r4� 12c r, '4 � \ � I + WWw W ywyy WwWy y yWyWyW .. WWWW �wWw WWWWy y L1.' � p .,Fy 'l� W W W W W W W W W W•\ W w W W C! (3, O 3 + �{ o + ` wW Wy WWwwwy WWW Z N 27 LAND-BANK + 20I F-I MAI WWWW O PARKING SPACES o II r J I GRAVEL ROADWAY "5� z� s. s- i C �y w W •� y W � N wWW WWWWW wy y .. wwyW \1, yWWWWWwW wW WY WWwW 20' REVDENITAL G V BUFFER FIRE ".Ea / HI H TER MARK ,M.qqq, W W W W W W +-4Y OOPS W W'r B17LKF1EAI'� + Cyp t0 I � — + 17c y W W w W w WW w w w i + F ^'.- DWARD LIMIT OF WE N 5 AS + F + + FLAGGED BY JEFFREY L. AN, R.E.M. OF ZONE R40 r COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL G ORATION ON "'y3@�,'• CJ AUG. 12, 2003 MONUMENT. TYPICAL N"°�4'�W 25 `i`� '-0° I *',u,:(u,-,r 11.60' yN SIDE YARDO stirvL -.�:� WOOD D BULKHEAD i SETBACK t`"' "4"L r=s� t 1 DECKING 3 'i u'�,"� yiTkn`W�.�•"' _ FLOATING DOCKI��••�`� B'-0^ m OPTION - 8' 0 (SLIP I ) (SLIP 2) ( 10) PRIVATE MARINA (SLIP (5 IF IU www (Itv2 b ia. 7 AREA-60, . FT. d' + (,4�,w"+^ n1n' '"" "� `''^ W OR 1.3862 A FLOATING DOCK HEDGE ROWS I �. rt OPTION - 8'1 1.:. TO TIE NE(SLIP (SLIP 13) LAVIN w ly TRANSIENT Vis" y (SLIP (SLIP 14) / J ••:r MOTEL ;r NEW DOCK `1�j GS RAMP _O"H y W WWwW l'fi: �� RETAINING 6.01W x 10.0'D e' GOLF CART 5P + ^ �^rF!lY � - O (5 P 7) (5L IS) W 1� rrvl T w �_ RETAINI W w � WALL z 15 PARKING - b WALL .T �,;}:es / ,r fiiv NATUF*AL, 0 o SPACES W/ � + -nG.";.,.. ,r�; w- 4/EGETAFTI BULKHEAD AREAW w J` CONCRETE PARKING i / + \ t \ / ;t' \ O W W y w ( !^% 51PF ALK II ONLY' + 'i,.. CARD PN o \ y + � .� + \ '•:1 t r;T,., 3� - ,l� GULP URE 5 + + + t* ,f 1p, ( fRAMF UP— OUTb rRy iP C O I ° ° \� �TERR ErJU` `P •t� '8° g` gg 11 W W C•r i. Z 1 Litt'.: I I I 51 / + SITE SECTION SCALE: N.T.S. g '� � I 23 I ND5 I ,d° r r3 •`�^� � i a O � � I E 5TING BUI 1�c} m E5 1`16RROU / I + I ` I + 8S gg I( ERIRIWIRA TOt y I AGE 6 I i STRIPING T i ATE 5T • WALK 9LLQ ' RESERVED 5 5 POOL PA Ss. $ COOL 2 P RKING • �, � a ,� % W w Ci.^'1 PAGES \4� EA / w W w y ", I LOADING DO K N E 07RIGAL 5 % ,/� W W W y w IRP V R 5 ORMER 20'-01f Ia s \ (LANDSCAPE BUFFER FROM 1x10 AREA. \ T �•�� I I "• RES.DISTRICT) — 2-III ' STEEL � '��• SITE PLAN KEY KEY VIA 1R 3 `rr 9 I ME 6ENGY 12 TUBE BIKE i ii AENN RSAGTE OPE se s A Es — T8 PA RACKS SYMBOL BUILDING DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTON AC,GDATE BIGGY DUMPSSURE FIRE 13UF \ ENG - — HYDRANT — _ _ _ _ — _ — TAIN (� �� OB TRANSIENT MOTEL JAPANESE GARDENS BY OTHERS GARDEN WALL X X X X I AE X 5I ES X X E x 1r� b FIVE UNITS BLEEPING ROOM ,`.`.,.��:'�:°. =z' _ _ — ------- _—_—_ _ ..:�15-Ir, MAN-MADE LAKE IS P GE PA E / 4 OC THREE UNITS SLEEPING ROOM [� r';, }:` IJ NATIVE LANDSCAPING ' r•(;%3 TRANSIENT MOTEL PRNATE �(y°,, ASPHALT PARKING O CAFETERIA DINING HALL .y ,yn AREA VIG (PRIVATE RESTAURANT)ANNEX rt•( `O n ERE N3851'19'W — — — 927.89' ESTAURAN �- t,;q^i, ENTRY O (SPEAKER d TOUGH FGHEDGE ROWS COVERED DECyHIGH ATEMARK H 6 . PAD OPERATED)SHIPYAR NE 1� O MANAGER'S RESIDENCE o ROCK ® POOL HOUSE O m_ z MAINTENANCE L) O 8 p p coMbmmium p ts.{h GUIDE RAIL h� Y�ILL D BENCH MARK �' O 2 W 'Cleaves PoinV W �'�'^) ^ d- s. E s- z (V9age Condo) ING z BENCH MARK ` �r; I COVERED G4ZEBO t O NAIL SET IN POLE b IS 1 N O NAIL SET IN POLE ELEV. = '7.0 t`i• O Hof ELEV. = 20.00 now or formerl Q H H �0 ,`� rkeids Heights Co. m `B ¢ In now or formerly ITGAZEBO 2 1 c ALL PAR NO LEFT OF Guemor Redly Corp O GAZEBO 3 'Q ENTRY IRCLE TO BE ZONE RR ED VIA VALET v SE ICE EXCEPT WHERE -- a ED U N O ,,,_, 0 J �N b U � I Z N t0 SITE PLAN 1 C-1 SCALE- J1 = 40'-0" DRAWING NO.: SEE 0-2 FOR LOCATION MAP AT 1"=100.01 5 BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS BUILDING ANALYSIS W w¢LL�po J~K¢ I�.r a OCCUPANCY CLASSIRCATION CONSTRUCTION HEIGHT LIMIT AREA LIMIT REOUIRED SEPARA71ON FIRE RESIDENCE RATING PRE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING SPRINKLER REO'D WHEN SPRINKLER RE7D WHEN MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE ACTUAL SPRINKLER SPRINKLER BUILDING NAME OUAN ITY STORIES HEGHT BUILDING AREA BUILDING NAME OF OCCUPANCIES(HOURS REQUIREMENTS FOR SEPARATION REOUREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR FLOOR AREA GREATER OCCUPANT LOAD IS ALLOWANCES PER OCCUPANCY(SEE UNIT TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE SITE TOTAL z o z rn LL ax -Q o (NYS 3021) E(TABLE 503 (TABLE 503) (TABLE 503) OCCUPANCY REO'D PROVIDED PER FLOOR PER BUILDING ul ut w v 4x O?m rn a az '� a (TABLE 3023.3) BUILDING ELEMENT DISTANCE WALLS BASED ON FIRE SEP. THAN(SEE BELOW FOR GREATER THAN (SEE OCCUPANT BUILDING ANALYSIS .� ��2 z o o z y in I-y i z,=oo �r 1 �� m (HOURS) (TABLE 601) (FEET) DISTANCE (TABLE 802) CODE SECTION) BELOW FOR CODE SECT.) (TABLE 1003222) FOR AREAS) O TRANSIENT MOIL 1 2 --- 51,422 $3,475 33,475 g ¢ o rc O z o a z w LL a TRAN9ENT MOTEL 200 CROSS 175.185(35037) w w w ¢ o z M 2ND 430 dz°-�a �Q "„jo3m�U i ACCESSORY PERSONAL 9 2 30'-0' 79B w J z J N 1 J❑ z o O O 100 GR09S 44.32(4432) © FIVE UNTT'9 BLEEPING ROOM 2 IST 1 1,988 1,872 16,848 N i m r wm a w�z 1 n SERVICES(27 ROOMS) p OFFICE 100 GROSS 19.82(1982) OC THREE UNITS SLEEPING ROOM 14 1 30'-0' 1190 1,190 1872 26,208 PRIVATE CAFETERIA SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL 2A SEE SEE >30 0 PRIVATE CAFEFIR PRIVATE CAFETERIA TRANSIENT MOTEL PRIVATE 15 NET(ASSEMBLY W/O 833,33 YES YES ® TRANSIENT DINING HALL 1 1 32'-0' 3,834 3,834 7,085 7,085 +�' 'S $ DINING HALL AREA LIMITS TRANSIENT TRANSIENT B R-1 m DINING HALL DINING HALL D SEATS UNCONCENTRATE (PRIVATE RESTAURANT)ANNEX I Y o o (PRIVATE RESTAURANT) CALCULATION MOTEL ARCH MOTEL ARCH A-2 2 2 (PRIVATE RESTAURANT) (PRIVATE RESTAURANT) (TABLE+ (HOURS)) RESTAURANT OFFICE 1 CALCULATION ON LIMITS CALCULATION B 2 2 z 5„000 100 GROSS 1.19 019) O COVERED DECK(NOTE 1) 1 TBD TBD 758 758 758 758 aJ RESTAURANT OFFICE 2 g (NYS 903212) (NYS 903212) 100 GROSS 1.16016) Of MANAGER'S RESIDENCE 1 2 30'-0' 1ST 1189 1,987 1872 1872 2ND 798 J M CNFT SHOP N 100 GROSS 1.17 (117) POOL HOUSE 1 1 TBD 1,373 (C�, Q MARINA OFFICE g ¢ g OR 100 GROSS 1.190m) O 1,373 1373 1373 d U0 MAINTS O'1 O BUILDIENANCE+UTILITY 1 1 TBD 7,205 7,205 7,205 7,205 $ 2 cN \ � U,) BUILDING O CO Za � I- > 0 O 3 STORIES OR GREATER O COVERED GAZEBO i(NOTE 1) 1 1 TBD 341 314 341 314 U U J Q FIVE UNITS SLEEPING ROOM R-1 RESIDENTIAL(NYS 310.1) 2B 4 16,000 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 GROSS 9.94 10 NO NO Q �j a- < 30 03. (NYS 931.12+R317.3) N 0_ Z ¢ it 210 3 STORIES OR GREATER O GAZEBO 2 1 1 TBD 746 746 746 746 W F I= Z Q OC THREE UNITS SLEEPING ROOM R-i RESIDENTIAL(NYS 310.1) 2B 4 16,000 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 GROSS 5.95 6 NO NO Q W Z [LI O O lL < 30 (NYS 903.3.12+ R3T/.3) QQ IIT Q TRANSIENT MOTEL 7 NET(ASSEMBLY W/O k GAZEBO 3(NOTE 1) 1 1 TBD 100 100 100 100 O W J ¢ E d TRANSIENT CAFETERIA A-2 ASSEMBLY RESTAURANT 2B 2 9,500 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 > 10 0 5„000 100 547.7 NO NO C ED SEATS UNCONCENIAATE mm = W J O C 30 (NYS 9103.3.1.2) (NYS 903212) 32 102291 171,552 .9 W W O O O DINING HALL (NYS 303.1) (HOURS ONLY-NOT FIXED) SITE CC W Q N U Q N m (PRIVATE RESTAURANT ANNEX) TOTAL O COVERED DECK N/A LANDSCAPE FEATURE x x x x BUILDING ANALYSIS NOTES: Of MANAGER'S RESIDENCE 8-3 RESIDENCE 2B 4 UNLIMITED N/A 0 0 0 0 0 !so 0 3 STORIES OR GREATER 200 GROSS 9.935 1 NO NO 1. ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN FLOOR AREA. PART OF LANDSCAPING Z N (0 N co 0 ® (NYS 12 +R R-1 RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY _> 3 STORIES QR GREATER 2. ALL BUINDIN(;S WILL BE FULLY SPRINKLERED. 317.3) POOL HOUSE (NYS 3021) 2B 4 16,000 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 C 30 0 (NYS 903.3.12 +R317.3) 200 MOSS 6.565 1 NO NO O MAINTENANCE+ UTILITY 3-1 STORAGE(NYS 3112) 3727) 2B 3 8,500 00 3 0 0 0 0 0 C 30 0 1 000(NWS 903.3.28) 500 CRR (5 26 BF)713.2 52 2 NO NO USE AND LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS O COVERED GAZEBO i N/A LANDSCAPE FEATURE Q O GAZEBO 2 N/A LANDSCAPE FEATURE Q W BUILDING NAME USE SITE AREA RC-0UIRED SITE AREA PROVIDED k GAZEBO 3 N/A LANDSCAPE FEATURE , O_ J 4,000 SF/UNIT ACCESSORY UNITS-114)4,000 SF Q TRANSIENT MOTEL FRONTAGE INCREASE DIAGRAM FRONTAGE EGRESS CALCULATION ACCESSORY 7 ROOMS) TRANSIENT MOTEL ACCESSORY SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL SEE TRAN3ENf MOTEL Z z V z TRANSIENT MOTEL SERVICES(27 ROOMS) AREA LIMITS CALCULATIONS (SECTION NYS 5023.3 MIXED USE/SEPAFTfED USES) OFFICE TRANSIENT MOTEL ACCESSORY SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL SEE TRANSErfr MOTEL Q O ' ` 0 (NYS 5062-EQUA7ION 5-2) TABLE T PRIVATE CAFETERIA RESTAUFWNT V J 80,000 80,000 1�a .� ?, rF W CONSTRUCTICIN TYPE: 2A-SPFllNKLED ITABLE 503) MIXED USE SEPARATION: SEPARATED DINING HALL F= 0 9> 3yW' n . -�tY r. . If -100 LP -0.251 3300 Q � W F r 'pmt "*frsy iu v \ 3955%MEE PERIMETER DIASRAM) RESTAURANT OFFICE 1 RESTAURANT ACCESSORY SEE RESTAURANT SEE RESTAURANT MM FRONTAGE INCREASE %: CONVERSION FACTOR: 0.40 W U Z 4i� � " gra ,v4 xs� �� v� WHERE: (FROM 50671 RESTAURANT,OFFICE 2 RESTAURANT ACCESSORY SEE RESTAURANT SEE RESTAURANT 'R vO O g N If - AREA INCREASE DUDE TO FRONTAGE(PERCENT). SPRBNKLER INCREASE%: 200% (FROM 5063) CONVERSION FACTOR 2.00 (, A1C GIFT SHOP RESTAURANT ACCESSORY SEE RESTAURANT SEE RESTAURANT F = t' W - BUILDING PERIMETER WHICH FRONTS ON A PUBLIC WAY OR OPEN 23953% (M%TAGE INCREASE TOTAL CONVERSION FACTOR TOTAL INCFFJASE %: 2.40 t1 SPACE HAVING 20 FEET(6096 MM)OPEN MINIMUM WIDTH(FEET). SPRINLKER INCREAE) (100 +THE ABOVE): MARINA PRIVATE MARINA 80,000 60,380 SF(UNDERWATEF'0 Z tr 0 P - PERIMETER OF ENTIRE BUILDING(FEET). - 19,618 SF(UPLAND) Q Q xti,rYxm BASE ALLOWABLE AREA A-2=15,500,B=37,500,R-1=24000(FROM TABLE 503) . Z 0 Z W -MINIMUM WITHIN OF PUBLIC WAY OR OPEN SPACE(FFFET). GUEST SERVICES PRIVATE MARINA SEE MARINA SEE MARINA z O CL ?r 610 2D TABLE 2 b FIVE UNITS SLEEPING ROOM TRANSIENT MOTEL SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL N Q V r 0 I 100 -0.25 TENANT USE BASE ALLOWABLE SF CONV.FACTOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE SF ACTUAL SF % OF ALLOWABLE f [728 ] 30 O (FROM 3021) (FROM TABLE 503) (TOTAL INCREASE%)(BASE X CONY.FACTOR) FROM PLAN ACTUAL/ALLOWABLE) O SEE UNITS SLEEPING ROOM TRANSIENT MOTEL SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL -100 C0.84- 025] 0.67 1 TRANSIENT MOTEL. R-I(310.1) 24000 240 51000 35031 0,6083% 2 3 Pir TRANSIENT MOTEL -100 C0.55� 0.67 2 ACCESSORY PERSONAL B(304.11 31AOO 2.40 90000 4,432 00992% O PRIVATE CAFETERIA TRANSIENT MOTEL ACCESSORY SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL Q D v ;," SERVICES(27 ROOMS) DINING HALL � W 4 . Lv),s'i^; -39.53 3 OFFICE B(304ll 31,500 240 90000 1,982 00210Y. (PRIVATE RESTAURANT ANNEX) O, O 3E. Yt`,su[ NGM N i. r. I'ti:;F' , 4 PRIVATE CAFETERIA A-2 1303.0 15,500 2.40 37,200 9900 02554% O COVERED DECK NIA- LANDSCAPING c+3 Z F. s DINING HALL 4 } N Da2'a='; (PRNAI7E RESTAURANT) Of MANAGERS RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 80,000 SF(PERMITTED AS OF RIGHT) 80,000 8F w a z z {- tr< 5 RESTAURANT OFFICE 1 B(304,0 37,500 2.40 W)OOO 119 0.0013% w 3' Q ,G` F- aJ Q m❑ 1 O �Hq°;;� a U K .P;,;. 6 RESTAURANT ORRCE 2 0(304.1) 31900 240 90000 Ile 00013% ® FOOL HOUSE TRANSIENT MOTEL ACCESSORY ❑ y ❑ 7 GIFT 83HOP 01304.0 31,500 2.40 90000 117 00013% O MAINTENANCE+IRiLRY TRANSIENT MOTEL ACCESSORY SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL SEE TRANSIENT MOTEL <*:K*"< BUILDING W .�'Z2� Y �,+ , 8 GUEST SERVICES B(304.0 37900 2.40 90000 119 00015% J Asn aq +.ENY' TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF ALLOWABLE AREA(MUST BE LESS THAN 100%-SUM OF RATIOS LESS THAN ONE) 51,422 0.9401% OI COVERED GAZEBO N/A-LANDSCAPING SEE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SEE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE V k= M',T, BUILDING CONIFORMS TO HEIGHT AND AREA LIMITS OF MIXED USE/SEPARATED REQUIREMENTS(YES OR NO): YES GAZEBO 2 ACCESSORY To RESIDENCE SEE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SEE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 0 NOTE:THE SUIM OF THE RATIOS OF THE 11 COR AREA OF EACH USE DIVIDED BY THE ALLOWABLE AREA FOR EACH USE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 ) V (1007 OF THE ALLOWABLE RATIO). O GAZEBO 3 N/A-LANDSCAPING SEE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SEE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SPA PERIMETER: 728 Jk � " NOTE:SEPARATED USES MUST HAVE FIRE SEPARATION RATINGS A3 SHOWN IN TABLE 3023.3. TOTAL LOT AREA REQUIRED: 715,618 SF a . d . K k t i ` y;� 715,616 9F(754,877 3F OK FRONTAGE INCREASE ' s '�. � , ��r�. PERIMETER W/ ACCESS z '1 ; TO PUBLIC WAY: 610 SF w ZONING OWNER OKI-DO LTD. 20 LOCATION MAP SCALE: T = 100'-0' NEW YORK, NEwWYYOR;023 1062 NORTHERN BOULEVARD ROSLYN, NY 11576 a,:3'• 'ry '�y€1��+ '" ';; '� e, --` xi 5T*'-- �r-.. ) " ..z'�esn. MAP L70 LOTf3) 9 ZONE DESCRIPTION MI h LOT AREA 754,67708F (17925 ACRES) CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION OCCUPANCY CROUP -40 ITEM PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS REFERENCE Z 0 zoMNG ne IL - _r ` - MINIMUM LOT SIZE EXISTING NO CHANGE SEE USE AND LOT AREA REOUIIREMMTS 100-110 BULK SCHEDULE d GILL DRIVE Lot 4 LOT WIDTH 1670.0 150 FT.MIN. LOT DEPTH m 360"0' 150 Fr.MR Manor' Suffolk County File o. 2036 W FRONT YARD a Subdivision Map Of 'Marlon M J Lot 5 _ ,,� •x ,[1. ' .`, Lot W Lot 9 -L -Lot -L _ - 35 FT.MW. now or farmer &1 810E YARD now or Tormer now or formerty now or former ty now or formerly Joseph L'�cckrdl+ ,� � J25 Fr.MIR ohn ManogW+ na O,Walker Barbara Wlegel RobarL F.Muir+Nancy Y.Muir Catherine E.Plno - BOTH 987E YARDS 50 FT,UK Betty Manoglu eater J.C.Walk a .&, . _ta. - _ REAR YARD 25 FT. - SETBACK FROM WATER 75 Fr. 239.4 Joseph+Others - 4: ABV.LANDSCAPE ATEA 201A BULK 15' FRONT LANDSCAPED AREA ALONG THE 1ODSCHEDULE12 u u >J 7 4� ' n a FRONT LOT LINE �88a, GAIA 5 ABUTTING THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING 100-212 p S LL o r� -' t� SHADE TREE(MIN 2' CAL) IN FRONT OF LANDSCAPED AREA 100-213 - 20' BUFFER TO RESIDENCES, DOUBLE ROW 6' HIGH EVERGREEN, 10' OC Orme SHIPYARD LANE rge H.Gregory+ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD), NY n MAX LOT COVERAGE SEE BUILDING WA EVERY 40.0'100- ary C.Gregory ANALYSIS 101,552/754,877-135(BOX OK BULK SCHEDULE q' k-- ��= ZONE j , 'j WILDING HEIOHI'/NUM.OF S1Y. ANALYSIS SEE BUILDING ANALYSIS FT,2 STORES MAX BULK SCHEDULE_F A MRI - . , �. . PARKING 162 189 IDDnow or formerty 7 u _ sm t. SEE PARKING REl1wED TABLE - A ohn Cadwallader rn -,,_. m '1 - w- - . , :r I � ,- ,.-�.' _ �x MIN.AISLE WIDTH 22'-0' 60'PARKIN418'ABLE 100-191 C MIN PAR=SPACE 80 9'x19' 350 9F.FOR STANDING AREA AND AISLE FOR MANEUVERING 100-1910 r z,3 PARKING ACCESS 2-10'LANES MAX SLOPE:6%W/IN 25 OFANY STREET LINE / tie Lf r _{*' MAX 10% Y OTHER AREA 100-191 C AN I Joll n Cadwallader+ ) F F - = LANDSCAPINGFOR PARKING 4'-B' H SCREENING W/W iS OF 910E OR FEAR LOT LINE 100-791 C 111i CadwalladerQ uF " "`Gr-- J _ � „ - _ � ' ` -w ,. PARKWAY SCREENING 20' PARKWAY SETBACK '100-791(1) SETBACK ACROSS ST 4!-5' H 100-10(2) THICK HEDGE,WALL N R FENCE INTERRUPTED ONLY FROM RES.DISTRICT •POINTS OF NQRE89 AND EGRETS 7+ , xa, �+ .- k� MAX HEIGHT FENCE,WALL OR BEAMS now or formerly ..;yys � ,� ,, � ,'� x: _ _ y 3 � �x�"+L � - . I � IRobert F.Clark - '�. >r �'. yrs h. � 1.'� .1 ') FRONT TO 6'-O'H 700-191 A SIDE OR REAR 6 7/2' H 700-91 B LANDSCAPING PARKING MIN.10 SF.LANDSCAPE AREA W/ PAVED AREA FOR EACH PARKING iDD- 4 A SPACE now rmerl 'r sL �r w <QTR` ). ® �*\ `'t\ �' 0 '"�� rF 5 .V ,. MIN 1 TREE (MIN.2'CALIPER) FOR EACH TO SPACES 100-214 B Barb a 'her + MIN.100 3F. FOR EACH LANDSCAPED AREA W/MIN. DIMENSION OF AT McKe is R.Gunther r'*r€+'Fx t �,�. ' , „ N LEAST 8'-W / w 4 FT.WIDE LANDSCAPED AREA ALONG THE PERIMETER OF PARKING ASN.7 TREE(MIN.2' AREA FOR EVERY 40.0' LOADING 32,800 SF. 2-3 LOADING DOCKS 100-02 ow or formerly i -, �'' a ., 5,000-25,000 Sr.,ONE BERTH,EA ADD 1 BERTH FOR EA ADD. John V.Kent 25,000 SF.HOTELS, I BERTH FOR EA 25,000 SF,15 W, 14' HIGH, W LONQ UNOBSTRUCTED CCESS 15 TO ST a a a a I!; - ' . ? - :u. STREET ACCESS IF MIN.WIDTH 100-239A FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD 150 FT.FROM ALL PORTIONS OF THE FACILITY OR EXTERIOR WALLS, NYS PC SIXI11 rr ,,OEXCEPT IF SPRINKLE , 300 FT 3 uF - , - CESS CLOSER RTHAN SW FT.MAY BE V EDZ SHIP RD LAE q AMBULANCE ACCESS BY TOWN + - _ 20 FT.WIDE,13.5 FT HGH Q _ naworlo a N Perkelde HeightIf vSH PBfiY- - - . 4, FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION AS 46 �Bsge Condo) ." PARKING CALCULATIONS a ¢ now or former `• r'2. 4 �F F F,Q ., ' 82 E Guemor Reality Corp. - 1 USE PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROWDED a 1 PER GUESTROOM M (GUESTROOM) ■ TRANSIENT MOTEL 1 PER EMPLOYEE 4 (MAIDS) U ACCESSORY USE PARKING AS REO'D 6 (ADMIN.STAFF) O OFFICE-.1 PER 100 9F 16 (Pff190NA1-SERVICES) o 2 WA D NE3i6) 0 .�r-I m N 1 SPACE PER BOAT SLP 0 (BLIPS ARE PRIVATE) �'( z ■ ti MARINA 1 PER EMPLOYEE 2 (EMPLOYEES) 'I"� V z N 1 SPACE PER 3 SEATS 24 (72 PUBLIC SEATS) ZONE : - RESTAURANT OR 14 (EMPLOYEES) � � a O :xs ' I 1 PER 100 SF W E IS GREATER 2 (RESIDENCE) O N RR RESIDENCE 2 SPACES PER DWEWNG 4 (MAIWrENANCE/LANDSCAPWG) DRAWING NO.: - 189 TOTAL C- /'� - '� (162 PROVIDED 27 LANDBANK) L I / \ \\ / v ♦ \♦ •O b a N V / \a \\ /�/meq o `O ♦, SITE DATA w c; cq WIC 0 M. d'� / / �qh9 0^ /O \ + 9.02 ♦ TOTAL AREA = 16.3198 ACRE5 0 ° �° LL ZONING USE DISTRICT = MARINE II (MID DISTRICT \♦ // SOY\ P/0�.�♦ // / /'� \ \ VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V. DATUM (M.5.L. 1929) QV y0j'�`(`/T4 \\ \\ BENCH MARK - N.G.V.D. N.S.G.G.5) MONUMENT X325, ELEVATION I6.o5 JO / / . 659 \\ /, SG ♦ \ q6 h O OE h \ \ lbw 500 , SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION / // \ `♦�t�Q/ �,�t `\ 1 '36�, la;Dfy. /I I \\Y♦ Vr �^� \\ ,( �\ \♦ r' THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING BOUNDARY AND 7 7 ` TOPOGRAPHICAL 5URVEY5 MADE BY U5 ON MAY 5, 2003. i / ��____ Ir I � ^ ,(/ \ ♦ r 9.10 W. Yy1/y 0 y N D 0/ Corple• xe i ,, p /, • lT3a ,/\ sT Ot PQO' \ + \'i �. 6 + ° 6 + 1.01 `'♦,\ 1 ,� .7 \ /Oh \♦ :tl \ S �Q/ * 2 CJ N / / \ Qt B ^oec. I s6•mlN vec 14•vEc. �q \\ `O \ \` +n 0 < O-w1. / ♦ Oy1 LQ \\ 4 1460\ .'e•o ++ 11r 6 /1j. HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. No. 45893 p`• o a 0 �y 2. / \ �Or� ��• 159° �' �� 1 e•x°. + +.� I qq O^ __\\ /jOn„ \♦ I /AND - ¢ Um , 329 1_a + 7.91 I \ •\ / / � i ID• / / \\ rD.6\ � \ / /i \ 0 \ « 0.13 o� 00•aJ��O\\P r1s.6Bi.:� / / / / i la•°ec. / OG,� \ \\ 9 • t14 '\ \ \\ / ,� CGU A \ i + // l / / x+ 6.46 \ 6.93 . \ ci // I \ 4a "� 7 (a>•6•Dec. // _ \ - `•♦ r9,.r �A e\Ile .14 . 19.46 �� \ \ / // + 11.46 \' rDeG. \ I \\ O+ �^ N_i ♦ D.IB \ ,' ,. O� tt1 / 1 / D DEG z( .5L O J` LLI / /�OL i \_l \ + 8. 3 ``\ \\ / i`V� u ` Z / `\ , F \ Jr; ,Ips• 'N v, // � Qt 1(O V\ \ la•cNeWa + '+' ♦ rGx \\ + 1.16 ` ♦ 1r DF4C^ / 0o otw / [\4 + `� M `� / / >•DDG. \�` �� \y� �,' \ •\ 1.41 i\{ _ O / 1.16 la'cHe I I + 9.95 la• ' ID'cHENRY 1 - ♦° ' / \ \ \.` 166 (/�/ ,3°n LU I- /i' / • 20.48 // \ / • 16.80 , 6.31 C//y 4 � \ / I I / N+Y' 1 I°' ♦\ J 1 Off \\ \ ' ` % \ .YYV /' O Z 0 p}la'GF°6R \ 7 \J `•' ,.Ob = Q f41-1°•cVENiq ♦ / \ G/ / / SD 129 LLl LL / /' \ 1 '♦ \ '\ l30 i i+154 .99 Jt\a / / ceD / \��.- ' i/ + .e0 1,7.14 6 Z Z Q � � / 'NJ 1O' \cv�" __ �' 1n . B T H Z ` > Z o yr r �c 48 N.15 / 9� 9B s u 1C vt`w / `9� / \ / + - ♦, 550 , yy��. .01 c 3 -wi Q 1 3 / 0 b� la"bEfj:' / la' 1 1 + . (9)�e'LHERRY / \ , 6.5$� O' 1.9 \♦ /// . 20.15 �.�\ 0� �(�' �. \ e•tri. / - 1 1 // \ ® J' `IL ,(/ \\``\--� 6�3 1.1 U W N la• la•G1eWtY MSMJ' \ // Y� AAL� { ''{�/�� \ \ \\ C / 14.93 1 / I]• I ` la cH°•RY Ly/fl1.\5C zo /1; ' 5.49 19` Lo .14.91 I / ' 10.91 / I°' / '•\ _ c'cmeR FIRM �L 9) /„/ ' ♦\ +4.89 / \ (h I / / / (y��y 6•GQWY _ y�-'tly �'�j,�} 5Ka3 1111 14:AIRS2 ccm.�°,G . 6sb FIRMS X )ly' / 45 \\\ O •�-� 0 O xS(lW'" 7f1 r 4.95 \\ . w.s9 Ott(♦0/�� DF w I i i' // i61/u•emM / //// e•emne + u'G-FeRaY 1 `.\ _m (V II Q �I ♦ F 0 / / / \ \ m > O\ \ \ t Q, \ \♦ 00 ,Or /les6a / / o- 19.41 \ DDj} /• / / 9Oil 3 C) Q 0 / / W'. + / \. \ Q Q ❑I vVi ❑ 12 Lu z v �,�/ 12 Y� + 4165 U < 11.21 \ ', ea ♦ / / `�/ nl-u•cmna / + / u'c�e+.ar '\ ,/' O O o ♦ ` / \ / / \ / e b ^ THx4 / v0 �+ Wim) / // / / \ \+\x // / 5.69 1r c m• ,`•�' 9 SO�O \\ (W-u'.Ay Q + // / /// / *�c�q1 THM3� + �/• ♦ On. O s la. + / \ 13.46 // // \ // h / // / //I /"'ear If / +\+ / + rr..��1'//yy//,,,,�� _.N1O/ by ♦'\ @� ,J /'AVO CO ^.?/ ` Ipso \+ \♦ // 14"' //j* le'JJv99epa/� // \\ / // b1 / + 10' /Q\PG\ .♦,\\ �9, A ^S' \ \� \ ♦. / / +19.01 BB \ I 5.69 �* + + ID / \'♦ 10.65 1\ IShID'cmM I°•c / '\ \ /// \♦ `.` \9 \ .\ 1 �J4�l� 6.16 \ I Ia / \ , � .� 1 + /' 05.41 `.♦ \ \\ \♦ \ I `\ I/ / } 13.51 \%7\B� / \ / I / ,'' 1 \!, V. `, I 0•cmna `•♦ 1 !\+ /;/i/7bD \\,.'H" ` i_ \+ 9 p \ _ + 456 N% . aft/12Q. \ \ 54y,I94A0 / \\ /" r.i' n / / \ 411.60 SOS o `b \♦''♦ I\ A\ \ \\ \\ / //ems /� /// 17.50 Ir vec. \` \ la• / / + ` \\ \\ i 1 \+`''� „ `\ / \\\ / ♦\` \ \\ 95eeo .1,D \` . \ \ / \ \ \ / / /.111° .+ // ; /\ u•cm'Ix / \ \ / / THN2 +� 1\\ \ / / / /- / 6AD \ + \,\ / / V +\ \�\/� / 11.99 / // \V/ /I'�y,.�+..-..-.._T�� 6 +\ ` \ r 3.99 3.13 0 \t♦•\JO\�"O� ♦\ '♦,\ \\, 16.16 \ \\ i\ 4 11.16 / /' / \� •\ /i" DM Iti4DD � / I \ \ / / / 3.31 A + 0 r,. +0P \a \ •,\', `°g \ , / �9 �+ \ s�+ \ \ _.. /\ . / / + / . 199 T1) r I \, \ /' / ) / OCQ, \ ' `� / \+ \♦ / /- 12• V + //i /' // / VU .'ij4x2,a I M1 *•yp, \ \ i + BAD + 9° i h lG0 C�\ G ♦ \ ,, ,/ \`'4\/ // / ' ' / / / N61•µ99 °(ais INa + 1'�, \�96 +\+ ` \ 1 . sag % / D,m'H1✓4 // d`V FO \waIb.DO / \+ r% / + 1351 / + / Q. ' t7� t \ \, o/ ♦ I. + .\ / / \+ / / I WL=NIN (59) b7h \� / icy- / OtC-0o'', \\ �• y0 15.29 //��\ // , �• / / \99b b.lq i+ / / / I ��pp11 'q // 1\+ / \ I % / 2.°9 �Jy� \�\ ``-\ * \ •� // // \+ / / ///✓ I a 152) 17Q � p.\4\6�3 \ / \\.\ II %i/ f g,21 \\ \\. \♦ + ♦` 0 01\ r 1.,9 r 1.55 I •-999 `Y-1.4e •@• 3 / • b.D \,\ i + 9.43 l� / \ \�/ / / T\ / / 553 --------(1141 n.91 'h1 i.,i I '\ I i/ I Al \ ♦, \ \, aj3 ♦ / + � yl`\\ I \\ pyJ �. ♦\+� � I a +\cam, u• / D2e / N' ) �0'-^U // 4s \tib // \ /y�as 1p *p\' .4.i OO �h \� I \\ +�:�e ' ,✓ \ / // Y N. // j (IOD) (19A) (11.1) + r 5 ♦, /t-\ + \ \, ♦ .s 2.1 / y p(' il.\ \>t,�o" I 94 1 // 0�4`v \ \ \ \ /�___________________` ./ / 6.16 / Ip- T \�\ +4 / 1 % R - /` 100 r 6.01 / 4 III _11W (69) 1, I j • 938 i��' + /6' / 3AHl \ D 1 % 11 \, 10.61 + _ '�/ ♦' ! /- / /j/ (a)-1D•cmul / (13.91 ' OP' 4 y WETLANDS LINE AS DELINEATED 8Y \ ` - + =---\ ♦, I /-'j'-_- u I \pb 5 :*bhl COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ! LOCAmlp BY \ `' o -`� / 1\ // �� 1.41 I 531,9 (19.9) (12.11 •t /,� ^ / I \ / / II YOUNG 4 YOUNG ON 6,26103 / Z. �10 �\ ` / ,/ \)\ / \ DbmM 153 � \ (19,1 03.0 \ ,\ .� .92 ♦\ . 166 Cy'L�, , flom 1` (11.77 5.73 a�,�7� pPS��g3q• / / %I +9DI / \ \ \ \ . 1.45. 6.92 `R (19� 6�( d' /'!' �+,8.96 / I i l �✓(' , / \\ \ \+ n \ •Z' /� / ' 9.69 'I �,/ 1.02 Y \ o )(•t2 \ O (1111 +I + I I l J (13.11 . -._._._.J Vii+ P \\.,p `451'0 \♦ ` \` D•cmlx ijOj _.�._._,_•_._._._._._' 1.04 \, /\ 8.99\ B \ 1 ♦\♦\ ♦\\` 1 %' + �V, 52\\ (IID) +1.61A +15Bb2 S \\ / / / V .��;1.1 •y'th N S, b 4.86 (13.1) ^ N A. lhG yyp i / ' s.Dl N / m W 44 V �` 1.99 -p Q('`\ ` y ` I ♦\\\\\ `\\\ / + L`/ e'\ I b9'k+ �\p +1.95+ 1.131 \ �/ / / �^ ry d y,o w is 3' (14.4) +2A0 '\ /� \, \\ `\ / 6.,0 •6` \ •1' + b9 /./ 6.6, % /9 \ \ 4.'A f135) 9 +1.95 2A0+ 9.4596999 \ tl / / / '� 'O''�''e[i v•D�e+! Bag \ •\, � •�, \ \ ��.pppyyy waJ (Da) 4 / 6.11696 3 330+3.2 N y ///�� ♦ ` "h9. Yr r aB 43 \ . 6,e5 / i / +sa1 i h / I b•1 d m`7'n y \♦ ♦, (IOD) PR / /-6�+(+3.�1=+9.84 / i/ / e 965 j •� / � w///^�� N I OYyyi �O \.. \ * ,�+ \\\ \\` ` i %/ 694 \`A/ ^/ip9 I 560 1.94+ pslj 4.05 Q� / % •ry / \� d oq dN .l ♦\ \',\ `', \ `•__:' ' ii 4oq +2a 1.26 .L 9.30 6.95 .'6.5 e9 0.9s �• \♦ \\ �' \`'\, \\\ i \ 4F \ + i.9 _ 'Z AA'` �•1 + i / W / •'",�\ O tl \ 4 2.63 {� 'Avg] TH%I , / �\ \1U + .9P / 6.16 + 6.4 4� 9a 5KnQ('j�3,B5./�2 i / 01 O � C/SCO \ 6.9 '�h \\ 665 �\�\ 6. \ n91 `� 969 f61�• C1�s 69 11 // (hry ♦ ` / .( A 6.09 ii 9 1.46+ GG h i 9 hq• \\ '\ ` / \ i y c Oy \ IS 54 349 +154 `]'! / +9.IB m. / 1 �,[Yy .� V�1 w S, ry 595/ i'// � 2.9 /h ry / I ^I O 6.23 ?� 6.35 i 6.51 \'♦,♦ s `\ *1.02 O o o, g r0 O^ COhq. 73 ♦\ \`'\ ```\G``A', 569 5 ^\ \` O• 6111 6.41 enF1•33,�/�_ 956 1.4 9.51 / 1�I �Q \ '\ 'T' al q/Gf '�J OJ \ '♦ ',. 5.7e a°,+�i/" v y O^ ♦ \ \ + 6,11 <16�, yb / O \ \ + /\ ♦ •� / y0' 4 // 9.85 O +' 6AB 6.1s n.A/ / 6.19 ..9 ♦ '\ \♦ \ \\, \" 4w (R{ \ i/, .¢694 / '.ql� / O 1() SS L 669 \ + ♦ `Fr yry ryy V\y4 IN O pp+(' ?oz� /�( / S" / j J N \+ 100 4.64 `\ \ 6. ✓S i', 9 WLPHIN O W v +\ \`♦ \\ � / %O �q , /i /L_ cLUS,Eft \.` \ \.. , ♦. % I 661 (it �a463 z 43, ' / ♦'\ Q. •\ .4133 / (2D)410 911LK AO BELLOW MLH ! O 0 ♦ ♦ \\R \+ %' '` II :' �y 664 , 1,t • \`b\+ a`� // 'y''� �,` fro 55 RSMoveO) ! Fri L \ ` ♦ \ \ T y`�� 666 ,,�.t 9�p 1 OZ' \. /JQry V I �I ♦ ..♦ ,\ \+/ 46 /y\I M PsyS/ 6.96+ 6.99 �p, i, i \!\ ��{^D� // \� (I3J a,, I•�^.v( w 8 \ \ i+ \+/i, '�\,\ 4 . 6.91 \+\ 1;2.T2C \ \ Vf // �`\� 1 e+••a �,/^� 5.00 \ -�W,/ �j� 9 IJl 4, N .� �+ a5J ` 1IS'•l1 U -a \ / �`, T a F �/ \'♦,\ + 133 // (4.0 WLPHIN w`\ I O 4 '\ .\ / cLL5r5R}��}f�, � m0 \\ \ � 9\+ `\,.i'� /// -195) • 1"1 � � 45 oll 6a�Cr'Irk * w , DRAWING NO.: 13 / / / flab) m + / kB 3 lumim ]ZI. PAVEMENT, WALK5 4 CURBING LEGEND DRAINAGE LEGEND o 0 0V \ N N N D° BELGIAN eLOGK CURB OB = CATCH BASIN N N N 01 = CURB INLET vGG = CONCRETE CURB FI = FLUSH INLET oc co \a ♦ ` n \ \ MGG = MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB o o / 0t \+(/ / i'gho p /O 9P4 \ OHD&'x24" = CONCRETE HEADER 4 51ZE CIC = CAST IRON COVER ❑ ' -' LOCATION MAP N ' / t pUQ� / \ qh 9i ^ \ RD = ROOF DRAIN ` / Yp / \ / O G �` ♦ CSWS' = CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4 WIDTH YB = YARD DRAIN SCALE, I"=600' '' �/ \ // Ot y / /\ \9/ 0 @n \ \ ASW5' = ASPHALT 5IDEWALK 4 WIDTH \ / \I\ S1r�t // / G / , HRMP = HANDICAP RAMP 5DIODxl2 = LEACHING POOL, GUANT., DIA., 4 EFF. DEPTH / i / �OjOti @lr� / `\ \♦` GA CONCRETE APRON LF = LEAGHI 6 CATCH LEACHINGFIELDW E / \ %O / / mr"' GGP = CONCRETE PAVEMENT \ AP = ASPHALT PAVEMENT G ` ,'.: MH = DRAINAGE MANHOLE „ ' � \ \\ - ��/ C MP = MASONRY PAVEMENT 5GP = STABILIZED GRASS PAVEMENT HDPEPIB" = HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE < SIZE RGF24" = REINFORCED CONCRETE FIFE 4 51ZE // '\' // / (�♦yt p(`� // `\ / / rs 59rfl�-`•4•.,: e9 7 5, �O /Oh ` v� \ - ', �i' ;y''U� GEA = 6E0-GRID EMERGENCY 6EN-G ACCESS E5 - END SECTION ep�t0� p(`1Y \ a°'v / ,e;y�°•7,d ♦p````�SSSi�i�i��###m er 4`11 @ On 6 \ "^ G6P = 6E0-GRID PATH \ IE = INVERT ELEVATION y \ / /� p !Q/� - Cr d' EOP = EDGE OF PAVEMENT E- = EXISTING p \r"2t 1 0 pl U' r �•1 b]6 + // ) cB Bas V \ f JJt�� \ E- +• TR � 1 7lwM.9a�\ S'� h 'i / \ \ = EXISTING 4sj �' // �� e 4c4oHq ,/ /' // \\ U,�t p�`�__ Gcn \ , •� � // /�� / � o �/ /%/ (/ ��_ \\ �` tom © �\r` ti/ RI •9Po119I \ �9 \>\ �.o \ \\` .S SITE DATA •HOPED\ `� I @n \ MISCELLANEOUS LEGEND TOTAL AREA = 18.'1115 ACRES o E ' I/, // ,'// \\� 1\_ `\ II sHep' o - I \, �/ ♦\ OR 515,0-15 50. FT. v 'o , _ /"v' LF 9 BEA` `b \ 7qy \ N Cl_ r� SBL = BUILDING SETBACK LINE a „ o �0(�\\Od0 \ \ ,ry y u. `\ he, ♦`\\ `u\ O T/ h° \\ /Oh `\ 1/ \ +2505,0 = NEW SPOT ELEVATION DREDGED BA51N AREA = 1.3862 ACRES - v O w` NG SPOT ELEVATION 1 I \ 0 O(/ \ „ ,\ D \ - \ = EXISTI UPLAND AREA = 17.2015 OGRES O a D o \ ® \ ° \ 20 = NEW CONTOUR .N D / / _____ - ' , Od \ Ga B' '6 ✓"•" 1111 °'• '� \\ N\\ qn�0 \ 6 �, \ So__-____ EXISTING CONTOUR o ° c \ r • : G ^ . 6 ^ \ B 9 `♦ \ RD = ROOF DRAIN x E E D O ' /� \ ,Or ) cB•� r^' I `\„� yy B ` \ +`�I qn p� - -\ h0 ` E MAINTANAGE BUILDING = 6,7-1450. FT. ¢ < O `d `F y ` = AREA LIGHT �\ ,,q\�' /' ,�• / .c+ i9,y '. I i \♦ :9,^ qLn \\ ^°, `\ ...• = PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POOL HOUSE = 1,054 50. FT. f II `\ / �S ,a'�p n"r p" I I ,� I to O' y �\ .0„` Y/@'�j@n , \♦ MANAGER'S RESIDENCE = 2,106 50. FT. Z of m D / r /', a " t / p*• ; I OO,M�1x.a A I1 ` tih 9 / \ G \ \ PYRAMID = 576 SQ. FT, UNITS (2,106 % 23 UNITS) = 40,490 50. FT. 10.44 I / !\`1> ffi `♦ \ I ®� I "�•` / ♦ r' ' Oo dD0 O \ 00 \ I ' ) `` E\ RQ g� /' \\ \` \ TRANSIENT MOTEL RESTAURANT ANNEX = 4,480 50. FT. r I 66 \ ` r 000 mwD d I I \` '�-• \ TRAN5IEN7 MOTEL = 29540 50, FT. o � ((\` 11,0 ! \ 7t9 ,r" °. � \ ` � Ot d,(a0'�\\p' 8 \ \ �,r' )5 " /'\\ ♦ 1e1n�tP • a� /O o ®y O t, ,' _ \ ♦ \ Z O \ (1• ♦ `s a \ M•Is W 00 \ o} -° O ♦ TOTAL = 92,973 5G. FT. r \ C . ` 1t 6.w ,. Od01 I 9 ''., 6.92 h \ `♦ / O Q LIJ �\ (`0,0 GO OaVa "r ♦cg ♦ r cB a Id r0om> O '1\ -',\A'\ afro', '`� 3 <O \ \♦ \ /', BUILDING LOT COVERAGE m J O \' r G GN� ^ ' ,)• vE. ,IDP y0 \ \ ® / ` r 108,781 50. FT. / 815,073 5Q. FT. 15% \ J\\ ® ." \ 4y .9.1 1°.i'3 FFE/,o\1 °M,oa1 ♦ \ d n� T� B.la ` w U \ 6° r ♦ / 'd` _ i c > \/ a0 ` 4--'. \♦♦�. - O o6 \ \ +exp \ / .,b �l/ Ul 3 /' 19.46 // �`, I \ �e® / :L, JI o • h 11.46 �� ' 00 GEA . 7"�> `4,* Da @,,v \ e.le `\ ' \ O U Z ! _) © r ` ♦ O 9 } a L - • \ h0 / ',, '`. `♦ i NY5DEG JUR15TICTIONAL AREA = 7.0548 ACRES 'g tlOO/ !`�" \ "r" \�� , ^�1 fl `♦ ' �• /' \\ 0. 3 ++ ,// i IC� 0 q02 o �' � I ♦ ° RIM.2] /h cAm\m� \ � IM. I r \\ "4 +�, O,+ /' `.♦ k%O' � G �l U J / , ♦ Y O` / GB 69f1 / •4 O 4' W G i \ \_ / O\ y �/ / t I \ OAO RIM.D ' I\ n rp .(Q ` _/ r I--' Q 0 da r"" 9DP v z •1 Oto e < 1 ' DeA ey \ \\\ ZONING USE DISTRICT MARINE II I DISTRICT _ IE 4.� ♦ , 1:0 .f ' `\ ` /"1 X \ { Co l� Ib Di'" 1 : \`'(i ' r ♦`\ +� \ .qQ3 C'' .� \ `\ \. W \ \ ♦ ' ' rj / \ .` to6 6 _l / ' \ 4 � ,' VERTICAL DATUM -N.G.V. DAVM (M.S.L 1929) O Q O sm ),16ea saT `�- 1--- -- ..--- 'sBr,>Y \ ,S06 \ , to 20.4e \ ^.Y s` \ 1' �p --/i L \ ]�t(o O \ , + ♦ /` °cr \ \ `'\. i' �/ BENCH MARK MONUMENT X325 6 J •"/' ', / n' EL=9 'K9� I 1R `� �• ` 4S +,.50 + i a,eb ELEVATION 16.05 $ w Z w QLI- ♦ �/ ! ' \ eo \ ( 05 m n �_ I ifE \ i' 'P `\ sAab x L' < /( Q' O `\ 0E 4.1-FI O { n \ \ r •h 2 �l �' / \ n 9 � ,54 .99 ,]9 6 / '•lj ✓',% •( 4 I-Bo O 14 SOUNDINGS 5HOWN THIS (4.0 ARE REFERENCED FROM MLW I- (7 Q Z / ! ^ .'" 41�z \ ° m ui / '\ I I- 4xp .39PI6 5P . ` ARer,ct;9a 0 \ agf 4 B I / GAZEBO M3 Y / �ieMs� F �: Y' t1` t t \c?> u 11.1s FFELml0.00 / • sB p O( r0 rb fi\ / aC(' ' `• �. DDQ 5 .Dl�$D J y o a' `, 0`,( s.so LF No., �} / jl=' r. O qa Q ) / 1� _ ( R J'(`\'lJ4+? \ / JI1\ eA4 • •\\ Ga ` •( >\ ' DITCH f / o . ♦ 4.IaoxD " ' s.r� 'C V 1.1 O (% V A .. , , I I 8- ` _ ,.w' `+ \ LCB 7A \` br�3 ,.I V ❑ d Ill H- \\ O ®za Y\ �` +� k 6�a w„ // ° ° q wM•190 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES DATA B ♦ �'/ So.l9 /' \ p0 Ot 6�' © / \ GC" / i ® .` le•9n2 \ LO !`Q ba /♦ LF NOb �1, ftLn 9Aa '= '\' / c UNI / , `6`\ 1 3p� 656 Q q)P�at� room> F1„ /•�`\\ d 5,09 \ UPLAND AREA EXISTIN6 PROPOSED o O \ \ / G A . +' 1e \A D "�,• P 1050 ._� v+ `!•^ ♦ • o A 5A9 ♦ a 04 (`7 ♦ \ C' � ' r \� `.` e ° 11 49 w. o � ¢f�, FFF1-` IRS;' q o � \ > 4 ,>, \ IMPERVIOUS SURFACES IHOIS ACRES 5.2980 ACRES N C`7 ♦ \ �' \ oo / 16bp ® \ y nW 44.91 / / lo.9r // / `l/ .-. ,. e♦, �. a� �+ 'ItO //In� I\ 06 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 7.5 % 50.6 % u V 01 • O , M b ) I••® / \ f i r p�Rh/' + + \I` \ . 4.9� / €45 \ (1f 11 Q \\ ♦\ P/t\`� `\ �� e90 r \`\/ ry0 f / � (�/ 0 rr' `) .` �9+\\ •n® 5 ` (based on 17.2515 acres) m U - m � .. \ w t1` Y• \ `ra / •L m o d ` 6' I / WEIR 0 7 /,p// r." ♦ �a,l=° / d \ - O ,01 - \ / ( Ot <` 61' le I BNos / 1 / i EL=q.oO 0 ( ! " ®DE" Ben WM: ♦ NY5DEG v w 0 ^v+ ♦ Op ' / / ,,..- 'of ' a I O` ` ♦ ♦ v Q Q 9; 3Qa, m \\ Y: ..,^ \ o ,M• \ 11.990 I U O ,la, xp 4c JURISDICTION EXISTIN6 PROPOSED ❑ ❑ -, ♦ 0 Q + // A \ D°4'y/+nN/)' Iq, e • O > \ `\ IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 0,000 ACRE 0.1660 ACRE O \ � /�" IB No,l9 19.41 \ 82 / 1 : •20901 BF ® 0 /r r/ 3 I✓ � / m C r « \ /�+ f yz 4 •� 0 / / '�Go 9ro°b i B,D�,9t ,m ce lo.,-FI r a ° \ \ U' + ,/deo ,. G B.I-FI / m //' 1p /� o q a / \0 r \ /[;'J RIM•TO° n + \ J o F NO.16 a ®na "f'1n9 f e1e.9M s �- a « 11.4.90 eCB 9}}{ 1" ♦ a \ \ l © N / m• a \ l06 oD p \ PERCENTAGE of r/"r c�. / •ee , ,..-' `!� oB'" wM•DAO y RIM- m . GAZEeo x + + 0' le•If " V I°b p e \ IMPERVIOUS SURFACES O.O % 10.11 % U + \ 9? , 17• ® /.. . >\e P p.00 !+ IE. .,4 ♦ / \ v r J r r /� �K' (basad on 7.0540 acres) / "b / •u D / G U \ \ \\`♦ b ,TRI&F'b.14 " / °vf + L 8.25 I � �i °•u' rr" // ,1. O IE ' '+` \.\`` ® , R \ M.14 ung �+ AReAc2 `// 1 `� \ /) ) j. / r /.. ' / / + rr".�.,...,.,,_ -f.0"�r Tall r"// 9`\ ° '' ) \ ` axt ', /RUN. \♦\ 1911 9F _ bl a.- -. Ie.D.DO / . N0.9 ° / / + \ p V \ \ , b SEt�GEiNIENT.PLANT } ,J ) " 0 / beP . ° =2 5 1p 1 \ O \ r 0 C S 'rY \ x•••555 \ < R1B to 1.957 ,D B p ° / O \ q @ ° ( EARTHWORK DATA 3 T 5 TEM' Y OTIIiERS 1110 l3 '�© AREA. pIB 9P ' LP NO.I 2I • \ /,5'°,5 n O� \ ` '+ + wl4•nPa n r / + cB toyFl o o yI MN 9.1 / f" \\ ® GUT FILL NET ° + THIS RIM.A.O° ° ° r� DAO / ,l D°�p I f/ ♦ n < O � \ ♦ 1991 + ' \..• 1 / I /, i) P e.pAO 0 I9 4.l n ., / 1 / - J7 '3 ,✓j o ; /\' TE ED a 4 o o S U�IITO ,SN�O Cts' -PI jj 'S@ CC r� ♦ ENTIRE SITE 12,142 GY5 27,688 GY5 ISS47 GY5 FILL I� 4.10 \`\ r `// 1 - 1 / ♦ r BGP 6 / IE.4e] OA1OC$EP \ ' ___ VDD / s _ �I _ •sbo ♦ 9 n 11,a' 1A\FI 11.4.9° FFE -. ". _ • \ �Q` i:,2y ve bo0 \ BEA �,\e' / ♦\ , .6 TO + V \ / / _ / d n >, RY/ + • CB IOA-PI b9 � -_ ..,{�-� 1 / ♦4 ` 'O � ' V®�@" \ '� a� qYR, ' (� �:-r..�� /i• + // q°4 / //S.eB .a ` FE 9LPN°a1 \� I:IeR � ' 1 y 5 ° °a a0 0 oAO�` , ��0'`'�O ` J \ ♦ aP• `/ rtlf ° r �_�_ ;� -/ G / \ h \ 1 (/. ....,.,7,....+„ • , 0 •100x9 'I - `�a .� .: ..:":.::.c,.., rs °Oro ® ,+• "h\A.,, o LF b \ \\p♦ /'/ ♦\\ `,\``\' .22®�1� I 6 O ♦` p 01.101x9 81 \6 3 • <Uv ¢rlr ; :_ :_Y_P!i + I � 9If1 a yE;?� ./ b.lb 0.15 TR:B8N0411� °'1', /. •. %¢m x0. .00 nQr „OC�wA �e rS.IN � '°,�,,,, ^\ ° B• \ ) `' \'C`\ \©�V \\`\\ NOTES /' ` +\ �� u C. �\\ 9nisnm uw �✓ I / I I ' ,„yp ' '- '- ,.. O 6to♦Tf wM.e ( n MP+' n� \ .+ C(, \ 1 l fl ° e�i' \ / ! " I �' Re.eJ•OJ I /i.. _ Jm.[-�•�f00� E.4 IV I ,�0� a\O i y ITRIB A \ Q• \ 0 ® ' _ -- T[ + 19 '^' +nm u ° r \ \ "\ .. \Q' 'T°D ` 1111,01 VE•6 t �r�. "r' r •le 9F \ \ / � -_ _ [ a: / , �, °5€htr4�1 � 10.111,�1 / - (� N 1050 -s „c, ° lrt" "Z• I. ALL EXISTING UPLAND IMPROVEMENTS To 8E REMOVED. ' /'� \`♦ `a '" « o / I tl I ' R4fI°1 I 111 0 FF81-p'• ' 11 BIeDn3 kddLm � r I ,rS � i `\ F`• ♦\, ` A �°° ml ° \ / I I I_ _ pM9 rOomB I ° '�D r f' `\ 2. REPAIR AND OR REPLACE EXISTING BULKHEAD IN KIND Ib. 11 F�'01111 I , [ \\ / ry (/ I// ' TRANSIENT PQLy7EL n �iloolxe I n- '� • -, F I��\ n ,r,,.lrt..,.,. . ,,- -•�� AS NEEDED. •� YE, .4y. S a • '� a ININ6 .-' r -. ' 4s6 I \\ \1\ ) 4.1 L 'S \4 \ \ v '•`I' e IIAo m GA PRIV eeM 1 / 1 qn O +7¢A,y ♦ y + �' d' /� ` + / / m .1 , '• '_+"` °°e �TERIq A'� 5.a5 V S. APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER MARK SHOWN HEREON IS ,( yy 'a� ♦ y ® E ( 1H c 1 0 1 s ,A e•• / ('pyTyBy�-r}� HgLL d Io pr L_ •^ ,r /LCB e.l-PI RESIDENpp �'^ „a /1p�„ BASED ON ELEVATIONS DETERMINED BY U5 AND UTILIZING A rj, 3 �•A' • 1 a2 , e' IC po PDDR m / O .� \ \. ., \ 5 / � � y \ `\ ° / \ \ "_' I N . c, ° �' / I _ ANNEX ° O C y \ / wIE•99B / \` L-F� IO.Op I uuT1= / ♦ \ tl �,{' FELa ''� ♦ SEA LEVEL RISE OF 0,0070 FEET PER YEAR To ADJUST ^x � \ ` � �' � e J "`tlr � .CO` _ � \ o ss re , n '., r - FEEL= \ c I \ ' '♦,, • � _ __J �\ THE N.V.G. DATUM (M.S.L. 1929). \ '\ \ . 15]3 d \ / D / -;✓�,- IO,Sp\ ° M Ao ,L.,^" r;\` / \ _ \ heisss \'[\ + ` ® \\ TRIB NO.B O ' I ` o -r_� I / p 0 6 ✓'' �- D / `♦ \ 4. PUBLICATIONS INDICATE THAT THE MEAN TIME RANGE 15 9 3@ 'a+ n.5o' \ ARBA•2Br12B DF u \ I / 1 v O o ® / / , ° " ,P' , ` 250 FEET AND THE MEAN TIME LEVEL 15 1.25 FEET. `S `�' 0 q1Iss ' TTTNVV r \ 1 / ( I JN' w / \ r / l / O /� ♦` ,+ * + \ ♦ �•196{41 ```� 145 / ®04.51 a I �� / EL=7 �•� i i +6.03 6.11 \' /�'•`\\ b.n T 2 6 � / /i / /' +2. ' ��rr �\ \ \ E•164 "" DRAINAGE DE51GN ' 4 1 \ \ CRITERIA 4 CALCULATIONS ` '` \ 7> IJ.S/i �.\ �� y 1 .• 0 • ' +6 1 � ,•�••-•,�• ❑az b + // $'` 6A6 // � • 1 \ ♦ 9 .1 �y ® + > \ ®: , r 9.. DO.m 2.20 �, g /221 V = ARG \!` \,(\`4 \ a. /.i » 1 DD7•IDHeL kp \`•\, ,ly��+ t1` O I \ \ �$•.e 2.7 \ LP NO.IS , / ° VE ``19 N°.I]B wM., 0 ♦ 9 �.i t ,•M,• 'J �' •�9 I f\ '\ '.l`. A = AREA of TRIBUTARY (G-FJ P- 10 Q d. \ \ + 0 9.100x, °LPa �+ D 2a •"' ' `` V 5F le•B p , o� " \ \./ 0 0 Ygp . \ LIMIT OF GRADING, R = RAINFALL N TJ 'O(` Oy p<` \$) \j♦ `. `. \ / \ 'p�' Qr' 3 \ ., '\.`., y VDY �Sjxa. 31\ I \ CLEARING < GROUND \ / 5.95 + 90 + G1 G = COEFFICIENT of RUNOFF (1 -t 0 t !'Q�/ '� \ ` .L 0 / �° 'ro 1 50 el �. tty , L=7.00 f `• 5,9\+ ` / Ot\ t(1`O`,QO ' \ '\ +'• lV 'b 1 A '6eay,/'Ni A.y tM' )! + '�•\+3.ee I \\ DISTURBANCE D,1=,µ19'B lG0 Ot ,010'1' \ � � ♦ - ` 'p s e., EL=7r90 � 4� '3 � 4 _ r59) • °�r> \"\;/"'�I\+ I \\ I - /� //• a� // ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION TRIBUTARY AREA ! •� F- ` }\. 15x9 Cn o ✓ / + o ° ;. '�+ o �, ® � \ \ ♦ * o \ c, r ♦, p� (52 MH I31l ry • m [ I �Vp'-qV_ '` .. 05 1.5 OJ`, i \ `'. \\ 0 Y ` \ RIM•9 0 4 / { wM.9".l5' 6°r I \"-�y Q, j]9.1b J 6.10 \\ I / ( / - . G y`� *�• \ IE•, O I IE•4e'64\ \\r +-993 +-1.46 Ye.3 �( / \ /' V I\h REQUIRED VOLUME ♦ \ , , / * .r \ \ / , 0 ® TwB No.1 ��N , ,q s "RPa,.w ° • //• g al 1 L. \\ (' 6.,6 I \ I / I` • 9Ao 3, / 4 U� 27,457 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.40 32 C.P. \ .`.,' \ I4 n •\ ` ARG•2'IADT \ + e s) y '� I 16•" -F' U1 ,�T' 4uT t ♦ . 9 ,rt n.91 `\ 1 / / /� 'O• S: \ ` \ ` w l0]b V....., + .,°' eA1 6 + �• o V.•�' Ci'2^ {111 RI•G / 'k 1: ti"nds ♦ \ \ 6 mx ' /^",• • Br ^ (13]1 S, I \ \ / /1 htT'} \ .^� Ir' #5.IB / D` /� r(.�- PROVIDED VOLUME I ♦7>� \;� �, \ s \ �O�y.' Py `f' m,l wo , \ •a Tito i r"' r4., D� y� ` \ ) / ry / /f G. rriYi`;;Sr'ao ju 1 USE LEACHING FIELD NO.I S� I \ � - _ (7) 10' DIA. x W DEP POOLS = 1,1116 C.F �x"\'`„ `pP C ( 0 "„""F\ •''i,''�0 'a�' ' i - w "o " ,p �p� D ,\ "" / f11.9 Jdv e�\qjb •. 1\ I \ . ,,, orl.n Ner r / 0 v / f \ \. \ / " •,. ' mmr`Z¢ x m, , •�~-' d �. / I I : TY / HOWARD W, YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. V. 2.1 . ^ ,}� 6 E'd$3 .. \ \ / 9J \ e,,,m,• / + / P'' ' cb D0 ry v\ ,C•/ THOMAS G, WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. NO. 61403 I ti TRIBUTARY AREA 2 TRIBUTARY AREA 91p eieyd°�\w 69) /D' / SAD 2W \ / + ob9 / ,1s / % ^+ •, ®R•¢ a // ,Ixr- ` (Is,4 WETLANDS LINE A5 DiLINEATED BY DOUGLAS E. ADAMS, N.Y.S. P.E. NO. BOBg7 GB 2.3 4 2.4 GB q.2 # Q.3 y ii. SOI 25 DCBw 16.1 M 9]D * �" n ( CNy4 '1651 COASTAL ENVIRONMEWTAL 4 LOCATE¢ BY . I YOUNG 4 YOUNG ON a 26/05 REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME_ 4'' ♦ \,. \,, \ AP ` .,) I �` g1 F �7�0 18,482 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.40 = 132 0.F. 26,247 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.40 = 1,750 G.F. /,\ ��•^ ,® u 9.50 / POOL 1\.00 s4 X9®6 >-0 \ PT- bsw) pd (u.,) 9.,4S,t p�I'�F� \ / \ EL= + T ` (192 oT $ A 3.�9 •I' +9.°1 / PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME r= 1 369 USE LEACHING FIELD NO.2 USE LEACHING FIELD NO.q \�\.,,., `� `, ,.a9 \ 6.94 \ •. "" « \ 1.92 R T.66 FF 9B (4) 10' DIA. x 5' DEEP POOLS = 1,368 OF (6) 10' DIA. x V DEEP POOLS = 2,059 0.F `/ ` {�I1M DSO 9. 5 + * \ /� LIMIT OF ,,t '/ / / I ' / / SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION ^"v' 1♦♦ \ , \ leas + d /.4b50 + Ic POOL 2, ' , \ tlIA) 01. \.�, DRED61NG (96) 1(//!,.oy�\ 1 i / / }•� I { \ \ 0.2 ♦ EL=11.00 ' ,P -- �� \ �, S' 6\+ \-• Ii l ,�_cp J� I. „w' ' \ BN00 y . + ,1 F 02PLI + __ ___________./ li . 591 / Q` k• Tw d TRIBUTARY AREA 5 TRIBUTARY AREA 10 1 \' \ 'Sp 9,1939E 0 5T� + \ �'� / Pa-\ --- l TT f v, GB 3.1 4 3.2 GB 10.3, 10.4, 10,6 4 10.? \ ``� A51 •g,Q, « B.7p\ s0 d +,\ \ '�� ,w .L. �y\\ • \ b) `y `t ns) /+169 $ \\ /1 ♦ e.`'.. Tc va \ 9 a "'�* /`c`,,,'[ _+ _ \C \ mA) +I.s9 191 ` / 1 rY / V (!• NEVI/'1. ".\ °Oi w W V W 0.93\ ` a i 52 .6 /+ 4.06 (14.1) ' . 981 / 't� (�V'1. Y dw Ci S• - REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME 0.99 �\ ` I 8.50 B.�(O ++ \ \ "� - ® !° '19 16a \ V / / �R- ,os- �+� � F1 m�d 52043 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.30 = 1642 C.P. 44,613 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.40 = 2,874 G.F. .\ \4 pp ° ♦ �• , B b9 S 164+' 1,14+�`p / / / 1" w 7.99 4 v ML-v +1.99 \ �/ / Sbo / y * .C'Ad DO f/1 v l^ D 0 PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME pE` �'`\I`Dan �!( ° " ♦� +b/�f •r' 4G 6s� \ M�s) (14.4) q �S• *i9.19 9'S \ •/ / / �I� O O K: b'i 0 d �' USE LEACHING FIELD N0.3 USE LEAGHIN6 FIELD NO.10 yA as \! \ + 0 900 MASONRY PA710 US 10' DIA. x b' DEEP POOLS = 1,642 G.F (9) 10' DIA. x 5' DEEP POOLS = 3,010 0.F ` \ ° R ` e,6 ° o 663 EL=1100 / " r Mybl E 0¢5) *195 soo+ .91+5,9 899+ \ �/ / / �/ HOWARD W. YOU . . . L5. . 450 �T, • T ,1 �i DO d v�,°� (eAl oat`4' '� ` bb3 /�/ / +9n i� ..0@� // X5.883 .l`•r�', "O i1 0.13 \ \,. ` 6.9 v6.v (ORAIwl! %r'' + O 6 ,p7��('1.Q 6,,16.50 '4D ],3,/ • 33oe+�9.0 v ' NG N 9 v } !� TRIBUTARY AREA 4 TRIBUTARY AREA II 4r 1 O LF .b O p 1 BY° HEP9) '" O j 9 \\ (� r1aA) // p< c) WF� t1 \ IB• x4 '9 vA /J" + 3q '\,I\t" / 46 1.54.10,4%5.4 4A5 / °ry / L� orp GB 4.4, 4.5, 4,6 4 4.7 GB 11.3 4 11.4 v ° "'/ \ Fv4y� } I. (\9]9.44 6.95 / ryh // mtiCi REQUIRED VOLUME ® ', D " ' \ / +o.9,4,1•'�• ° // P/ 4.69@ / „t/\ R'•�''61, lu REQUIRED VOLUME \ '♦, `. +S �, + Ij (`s N Q' ' 41,532 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.40 = 2,755 G.F. 13,214 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.30 = 661 G.F. \ `. `,(' * \ ,� + + '" 'w,• Q + .9 bab i ^9,09 �b'�4�>W 4.0 , ' �+, / C O I o \ .\ N� \ 4 .14 �" LF N0.19A° y �� b ' q,-t"f.° / / / O O w s 2,79 s / mry•" U/P � a d �a�w e C C` �6.9 « {�6 r n•1oOxB 09 ZS° 9 >,,o �. PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME r /@ p \ ` 16gP1 Y 6A9 qa TRIB NO.ID /, ,� \ . (/ D' AREA•4D9D 9P 0 ,,/ %, 4.49 +1541.48+ N ,� . / +9.10 m.ryB` / 4 e USE LEACHING FIELD NOA USE LEACHING FIELD NO.11 GG i1 /j q q. \ \, .� \+ i be ry p �\ s9 i 6 4,2 V• ° / �i ° 0 (6) 10' DIA. x 7' DEP POOLS = 2,874 G.F (2) 10' DIA. x 5' DEEP POOLS = 600 G.F S 9 ° ♦ \ '+ ® ♦ l+ /6.21 D > o O C \ 6 i +1.a4 I3Dg s9 / m / I ly o "Sl @ TRANSIENT / 3Z• a9 / AREA O BE DREDGED vTRIBUTARY AREA 5 TRIBUTARY AREA 12A 4 I2B 9^ ° c Ahs \ s1 7 r"` oo MOTEL ;'�3 J`TQ� _ 956 5fi 4.44 / (APPROX. 2500 CYJ {C ° B J' O O/ ''� ♦ \ \. s. I. 1" FEEL=10.08 , S, b•"J // �� LB / GB 5.2 4 5.3 GB 12.1 °n hq• h6., \ `'\. 5.03' rr`t. ARe l I4Rv4eT `° ar,\y O La�a ss1 \ / F l`3 CV �p,b•� EXISTING EXISTING S q .3@,A +\+ NEW ROCK TOP EBULLEA4.41 EXISTING BULKHEAD TEST HOLE DATA ^ REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME C' / \ \ ` " �,'� q^(`� , /' / �\j'8@, �`@ / REVETMENT 6RMDE TOP EL. = 6,95 - PREPORI-Eo BY McooNALo 6eosclENCE ON 6n3/w 13,355 S.F. x 2/12 x 0,30 = 668 G.F. 123,729 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.40 = 8,248 G.F. O`y , `'\ r « LFTLyIT \ 9.05 d O„ 4.60 / EL=4.50 �i If•I`abn9 \ / ` / // ra .rj, / 50'k PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME TH92 nut m 3 USE LEAGHIN6 FIELD N0.5 USE LEACHING FIELD N0.12 ♦\69 * �� ° (�+ EL b oP' EL=b.w o.o EL=b. , o.o w 3 (2) 10' DIA. x 6' DEEP POOLS = 821 GF (12) 10' DIA. x 5' DEEP POOLS = 4,105 OF 1.45 +\ ``.\ \+ �`!• ',9 b _ / \ / v0'E \ G(Q 6E BULKHEAD -_ , / V \ / BULKHEAD 1 = 93 SAND, SAND, b, ANO, O ,j,O d sl - ( /- LOAM I LOAM 1 LOAM l ap / 6.19 \ +\ .\ 0 ° AP / / r 4. J (7 i / \ / TO REMOVED ,/.////// / / //1p1 d4 I; . / SHELLS 2.0' WL=3.69 ELLS 45, SHELLS 1.0' TRIBUTARY AREA Ib 4� ` sb9 `\ \ �"A f' N �"+- #y1 Q\c o° / v'T \ �,p. / /,/// i /i/////'i//'` %'/(' / /\ FINE MEDIUM TO CLAY - BROWN TRIBUTARY AREA b TRIBUTARY AREA 13 q v I- Y a y \\� y e / \ ML=9P5 FINE SANG 39• SANo m \Iry 0 � / DREDGE TO (EL=-4.(00) FINES To e.o' ,, 0^ GB 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 4 6.5 GB 13.1 TD Ib.l, 16.2 d GB 16.3 4 6.a s. + ^ \a ,a\ y( / / wL=1.OT sa > q � \°a ce ll.IrFl � 5 � ry+G ;F Qi > �'• / \ I� 1 \\\� \'/\'\',�/\('y\�,.)y/\C\ •\ P1Ne SONO poi E� BRaWN [o \ ` 480' \ \ IE.4 1 '(' \tm, b F y\ \ 0 /%/✓ /a "K �/� �/ BILT REQUIRED VOLUME „0•�� \ '\♦ �'�: RIM.bS4 -I.iO ,A ♦ 'b j,� // .lt\q.(� I \ ! OcbLAY1G 3A, 1°.O' SILTY 6P Zv REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME 4r` > "+ abs,. 51\1 1f 6 / ,F^Qi`+jT +\ 29,016 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.30 = 1,451 G.F. 20,551 S.F. x 2/12 x 1.00 = 5,425 G.F. 29,153 S.F. x 2/12 x 100 = 4,856 G.F. 4 $+\ 4, \ 4 >-1.4p 6 / k �1� \\ \O-� c >� 4'.21( i !'-C- T SILTY SILT" SILTfBAND T \ Q SONO ,O, SONO 9A' ♦ ,N. .,\ g�+ \\ j a / TP \ / (Ib) SECTION BI-B 150' li PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME '.AA \ '`� \ �'•` ;5 ,I 7.25 \°py o, i \ / `F U� �i\ , , MEow:.Z] rF-1oi,Rse FINE ro USE LEACHING FIELD N0.6 USE LEACHING FIELD N0,13 USE LEACHING FIELD N0.16 >4 \ ", -+ + \j ir4 / �\ a.10 REMAINS of = 20 F1N9 snrvvSAND O o [p J. (2P)+ SULKHeAo BELOW MLW M/ICA K (5) 10' DIA. x 5' DEEP POOLS = 1,111 OP (6) 10' DIA. x 9' DEEP POOLS = 3,695 G.F (18) 10' DIA. x 4' DEEP POOLS = 4,926 QF, �' ♦ ♦ .. 43,1 / ' �% r / m0 \ \ +` ,5\5 I 7• , .64 t), ,.�'•q n?`I� / �`}'� !'s �\ � a\ (TO BE REMOVED) I,.o' BRAVEL SIP' COARSE 11.01 , / TRIC N�.ID �f 6. 0 / Z 7 / �� ,y♦\ {JU ��111 TRIBUTARY AREA TRIBUTARY AREA 7 TRIBUTARY AREA 14 \ \ asp p y 0 `\• F+•I GB I L1 \ \ / \'6.91 > ° 1 , GB 7. 4 -1,2 GB 14.1 4 14.2 ' 6 .45 7.40 * LP No.19B ' Y br• //'\ SAS, O.O' EL=T.14BROM D.C. ^ g, , O ° 5.10°,0' v / �G\ (95)+ SILT LOAM REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME \ Re, ]s �'� . \5 ° pp °Wl. "Iv, / / P 0111� \ +a FINER° I5 70 °'S �F••1 4,925 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.75 = 616 G.F. 27,313 S.F. x 2/12 x 1.00 = 4,552 G.F. 14,cI48 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.90 = 2,242 G.F. \ 'q.0 v} 0 5 �R^ ' / \ I„ sANNDARBE MEDIUM V o PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME TRIBUTARY AREA Iq \� "'f�( 1°B'�- 'O° DS + B / \_----KEDGING L RAVE. a =2. 5 USE LEACHING FIELD NO.I USE LEACHING FIELD N0.14 USE LEACHING FIELD N0.17 ,� R1 e]s o ° LP .1D / (1ST LIMIT OFD + 4-1 $ TRANSIENT MOTEL (ROOF) 1'r. 4]s \ ICI oxs .740 a 6 64 6�- a O 0 (4) 10' DIA. x 2.3' DEEP POOLS = 629 0.F (8) 10' DIA. x 9' DEEP POOLS = 4,926 0.F (11) 10' DIA, x 3' DEEP POOLS = 2258 G.F ' / 224 36 t (aU °` R FINE TO aRbANI° \\\ (1 A ` ,ryj ° 8. 9 / MASONRY `\A cSAND CLAY ,P' • •1••I u) REQUIRED VOLUME \\ `�s a'P S« ° // RETAINING (55) wL=48, M,,: q'' TRIBUTARY AREA 8 TRIBUTARY AREA 15 TRIBUTARY AREA 18 28,5-15 S.F. x 2/12 x 1.00 = 4,763 G.F. �\ \ds0 7 ' / WALL Bo' / TRAN51ENT FINISHED FINE TO OSAND GB 8.3 4 8.4 GB 15.1 TD 18.1 4 GB 18.2 \ \ "' ">:°,,,F°`' / MOTEL PATIO ROCK V PROVIDED VOLUME \ 45 / GRADE _ USE LEACHING FIELD NO.I9A \ ° , / FEEL=10.08 FEEL=10.08 REVETMENT h>e) cOgRSE 11'0' I•+I z° N REQUIRED VOLUME ggl�p FINE ro PP••'' REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME (IU 10' DIA, x 5' DEEP POOLS = 3,763 G,F EL=7.05 �� 18659 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.40 = 1,244 G.F. 25,425 S.F. x 2/12 x 100 = 4,237 G.F. 11,900 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.90 = 1,983 G.F. EL=4.50/ � y m USE LEACHING FIELD NOJg6 \/ '( Ob,�i�/ / GARDINERS BAY o v ED UME USE LBA H x 4L I EP POOLS - 1,968 OF USE L DIA. NO DEEP POOLS - 4,310 O.F (IDR'O ACHING FIELD .la = 2,053 C.F T 10' DIA, x 17 DEEP POOLS = Ip26 0.F ` / HWM=1.84 UPROVIDED SE LEAGHIN6 FIELD NO,B USE LEAGHIN6 FIELD NO.IS USE LEACHING FIELD N0.18 / J "-"-"" -MLW=-0,66 [14 - TOTAL PROVIDED = 4,78q G.F. .I2 / SECTION A-A EXISTING/ 20, GRADE / / 1 I 0 0 q_ N 0 O p ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION ,r �` m�uo v - 11n^ m � � s o ° f CL s NEw 0 C. we r 21'-O" 10" DIA. X 28' PILE b'-O" O.O. WITH 5/4" CHAMFER HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.5. L.S. NO. 455 @ THOMAS G, WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. NO. 614 7483 DOUGLAS E. ADAMS, N.Y.S. P.E. NO. BOb 9in O�yRT- VARIES 2"x10" DECKING 2" X4" IS, X 61, X 0" 12"4 PILE DEGKINb TOP WALE ' 61,x6" 3" X B" J015T HWM = 1.54 FINISHED GRADE IT'O.G. t SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION N �I a q o o - - - - EL=5.50 N z 5/4" BOLr 6. :., ( i t / /i pP NE m m z IL MLW = 0.66 777 2 xe ?,��' ;. .,,� " ®r _ 6 '�F' ��' � _^ E a; of --------------- r �. „ „ ,� ° PILE STRAP n,'...•C:,.;'.,:,' ..' .,, +, . ,,. .,,,.L::`,.,':.', ,:5,"',:'�.;, i 51 DIA. 0 EL x 61 T40 -1.10 zETIN * � W � 0 N c 4 x21 xR' STYROFOAM BATS. •1�,, "' ':,: ,f r Noe'!' " I � E O 21,x4" STYROFOAM "+' ' HWM = 1.04 HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. 45Bg3 g SUPPORT :',( .'''•+ ,., . ;fr LLL 2"x10" DECKING V, COUNTERSINK ALL �A� �. ..,,. " '• i';.o1 HARDWARE AT FACE - " E OF PILE C/) 2-3" X 12" PILr J 16,_0° --q'-O°---� CLAMPS - 6" x B" WALE 9 MLW = -0.66 TIMBER FLOATING DOCK W J 9/4" DIA, `l `/ SCALE: I" = 3' Nur I NI WASHER - v O PLAN 10" DIA. x 10' PILE 8" DIA. LAYL065 NUT 4 BOLT W4f HE W m ry FILTER I Q U z 10" DIA. x 10' PILE FABRIC Z U Q 9 Cie F- o a C) N W06 Z 2 " J 73 20'-0" R Il 0 < 0 O 2"x4" BRACING f w Z 'i' 0 , EXISTING PILE 21,x4" HANDRAIL BULKHEAD BOARDWALK 6 Q Z QGe Q q,_O, NTS t- G Q Z 3/4" EYE BOLTS 2-9/a" BOLTS EACH POST - _ OPTIONAL RAILING SEE DETAIL 3 a d 3 EXISTING GRADE EL=5.50 HIGH WATER VARIES - "'"M':' I � ' k� 10 0 0 .��'---J--YV G"CAST STONE COPING O V ° MIN, 24" BENTONITE ENHANCED 501E m<=xx-" _ Ll ❑ a N F- ° o o 12"0 PILE (PERMEABILITY, K = I x 10-]CM+5E0) _---===V =T� 12 :=:_ -- - 4'x4" POST - II� 21,x0" ° , 2"xlO" DECKIN6 IRRIGATION POND sO 61,x61, - = COMPACTED SOIL ' e M ° HWM = 1.04 Ir_ — 2„ ., � O � RAMP WHEELS o 2"xa"' OAP d LOW WATER VARIES — i' n o v OD -.r EXISTING BULKEAD F 21,x8" III III III 4I -- PIPE PENETRATION ' '•' n N > N b"xb:' _ Q io :__=-' TTI ��a GRADE - 3/4" BOLTS 11,x4" SPACERS .J__J� MLW = -Obb BOTTOM .:_.__ . -:rr.:..:.::.. :::_=::_.=+e>- II-{ :I 5/ LU - m �j v m , o _ 6'x6' _ - _ Finµ„- —m '.ND/BENTONITE MIXTURE OR PURE BENTONITE �\/ //%//%//\//\ (LIEVEU o�j\\/j/\ •. �' BRICK OR 510.JL QI U ¢ O AS 21,x4' STYROFOAM IN Al — -.m '��_ '(\ APPD * GRAV C Y.) 12/\ ��,•''. OWNER SELECTED nl ❑ w ❑ -- m— m_ �/ / pO 5AN EII P OLE O W Af PILE STRAP .1 XTY 1"We' -SUPPORTS 3/4' BOLTS PILE STRAP // i I O'O.C. v y° BATS. "0'-MAX, 5=10" \ • ' Q U m POND LINERV jx�//�\i, \ e FINI5NED GRADE ` /\ /\ �\ /\ EXISTING GRADE VARIES NTS CRUSHED STONE / M D ELEVATION \�/ / \ sHOORTD WE xM TIMBER FLOAT E GANGWAYCAP STO / SCALE: 1” = 9' 3 O 5 TONNES \ C y, , L5 RAFINISHED GRADE N EXISTING ' BULKHEAD � EL-4.50 La • ,m .• .•., • �.• i TO BE REMOVED 9UOfiNRCOUN�D TOE STONES I — 6"REINFORCED TO B TON EACH EXPANSION JOINT HWM = 1.04 - _ EXISTING SEE NOTE] GRADE W .r'' •f TRENCH DRAIN SLOTTED CAST IRON As MANUFAOTUREV BY RAIL AND GRATE A60 POLYMER PROVIICI5,INC„ MLW = -Obb _ !'•p!•' OR APPROVEV EWAI- NOTE CONCRETE RETAINING WALL "• " • FINISHED SURFACE OF RETAINING WALLS MAY BE h' C W 0 O L. P M L. CONCRETE FORMLINER PATTERN OR MASiONRY VENEER AS BPACZE NC LS _ _ b" MIN. J 3' 1'-0" 2'-8" i_ 6" MIN. ".•t, :'.�}f 'd' DIRECTED BY OWNER. ' ] FINISHED (V y4 O 18" NONE X4 O 18" 4-#'4 p4 O 18" NONE p4 O 12" u 000 ,�,j�� GRADE • CONCRETE SHALL BE fe' = 4,000 PSI AIR ENTRAINED, LLLIII ^"��, y � �— 4' 1'-]" 3'-3" p4 O 15" NONE p4 O IS" 4-y4 04018- NONE N4 O 72" ®0® NOTES: I,A ml°Imvm concrete strength of 4000 PSI le required. • ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 5' 2'-2" T-10" H4 O 18" NONE Q4 O 18" 4-y4 y4 O 10" NOW p4 O 12" The concrete-hall be Vb`0I to ellminate air pockete. 2,The finished level oP the concrete eurreund muet be SPECIFICATION 301 - LATEST EDITION a rcx. II aoove the to of the ehannel edge. AREA TO BE - B' 2'-5" 4'-4" X4 O 18" NONE y4,0 184-y4 K4 O 18" NONE M4 O 12" GROUND WATER(EL=1AT) PP P 9 BLANKET STONES 9,Ruler to ACOS latest Installation InekrucNom for cortrpleke detail,. DREDGED 5V TO 15 LBS. (APPROX. a5O G.Y.) SANITARY LEACHING POOL GROUND WATER SEPARATION TRENCH DRAIN ROCK REVETMENTS )DETAIL - CONCRETE RETAINING WALL NTS NTS Nrs NT5 FOR LEAGHIN6 CATCH BASIN USE CAST IRON FRAME t GRATE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY, PAT. NO. 340-1 OR APPROVED EQUAL. t. NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE TO BE 4000 P.5.1. AT 20 FINISHED GRADE 4 FINISHED GRADE 0.50 DAYS. PROVIDE EXPANSONK JOINTS 2 0 4,00' 2.00' 20'-0" O.G. WITH 1/2" BI'TUM'INOUS JOINTS. TOP OF GRAVELPAVE TO BE O R' tn gN m ELEELATI N o CANTAM5O6RAVEL 2GRAVELPAVE 650-GRID PATH � I, O INVISIBLE STRUCTURES, INC. OR 'A., cq d 0C',°� y / APPROVED EQUAL � I '4 }o :~ 00000000 : Vitt" SCREENED v' 00000000 ,c" OAST IRON FRAME ! "' '•.4,i• SAND m N . ``,' It"','"• �J W �w� cN 00000000 SRATE CAMPBELL OF 4 i a •:"� 00 00•0�0"0. 0r 0""':,�i;';":, �OR APPROVED _—° _- Oo N T`I O� oo. WK Itl 4" COR51DEWAL —LM 0,61' U 14 6"x 6" WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT 00001000 ° 6700000OnaiL W 't) ETE e STABILIZED SOIL BASED C ISHED GRA " " I FILTER FABRIC 04 c 4" x 2'-8" CONCRETE COVER SHALL CONE° YCLED FINRETE BASE F Q „ BE SET 1'-o" MIN. BELOW FINISHED H GROUT AROUND GRADE ENTIRE PI FLUSH CURB CONCRETE HEADER WITH 51DEWALK DETAIL GEO-GRID PATH cAsr IRON FRAME ! GRATE CAMPBELL NT5 NITS NTS " PRECAST SOLID WALL : FINISHED FOUNDRY,PAT.NO. RING A5 MFG. BY GRADE 8409 R APPROVED ORnINACE PIP[ GARL50N PRECAST EQUAL O 0m � OR APPROVED EAUAL. r•) ^ u� c 14'-0" 1�1 0 PSI PRECAST s nl: .,I, CO 4000 RETE BOX AS �• GRA55PAVE 6E0-GRID PATH r 1 Z 6 i BY SUFFOLK CEMENT OR 2 `./ O PRECAST STORM TOP OF 6RASSPAVE2 TO BE O 3 N DRAIN RINGS A5 :, APPROVED EQUAL c b DRAINAGE PIPE LEVEL WITH ADJACENT SOIL MFG, BY GARLSON ELEVATION. INVISIBLE STRUCTURES, INC. OR PRECAST OR I ' • 1_ APPROVED EQUAL *• TOP SOIL 6 SEED 0 APPROVED EQUAL. i a ;: i;, 'v•;r'. .iti.;;;{' PRECAST REINFORCED O �'I > CONCRETE BOTTOM ill m F O® 2'o SLAB NSJMP 1-I/2" WEARING COURSE 0010 ®0® a-2^ 2-I/2" BINDER COURSE 3" TOPSOIL R SEED 7 - " 4 • 6" RECYCLED wNCRETE BASE 1 I!' 1 s' c W RECYCLED CONCRETE BASE " . ; •,d ; dg GROUND HATER}WA ER —II— —II—� 1 1TTIIII _ I= - -Il—II—II—II—II—II _II�-- i=IIM—=-71 — , U] 6" srABIuzED solL BASE llt—II —II 6" STABILIZED SOIL BASE - SLmmi —� T r] NOTE P'1 U i I = LEACHING POOL WITH CONCRETE COVER I. WALL REINFORCEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO A DEPTH OF q'-O". O—n i FILTER FABRIC w H - 2.DEPTHS REiNrD6REATER THAN W-O"SHALL HAVE WIRE FABRIC b"CONCRETE BD O 1—)1 ' 0 o = LEACHING POOL WITH CAST IRON FRAME ! COVER CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT 9"x12", AND 2 MIN.VERTICAL WIRES- CONCRETE BASE T DO ' 12" O,G., I@"MIN.COVER. • •1•'I u] ,1 a 3.STEPS REQUIRED WHEN DEPTH EXCEEDS 1'-0". STORM WATER LEACHING POOL/ ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION STABILIZED GRASS PAVEMENT SECTION GEO-GRID GRASS PAVERS FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS '�'� U z N LEACHING CATCH BASIN FLUSH INLET CATCH BA5IN (No SLAB) NTS iO WIME NTS NTS NT5 NTS I••�� 4 ' DRAWING NO.: g C-5 m a I I Vo -u�pS < LAND5CAPE ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATION NK N �� LOCATION MAP / \ / t� O / ` / qo/off o \ \ DoE p� . y C aM a SCALE: I"=600' /' /', \ ///' � Or kO % /' `\/ h♦9/ l,o^ � \\ Wtl OSP � �COn+ � � o W E / % / rIZ / / SG \\ "';Y, ' RONALD E. PFUHL, N.Y.S, L. . 140. 1447 Aqp°' 00 yq9 Q'•.'- EOFNEW yO //t�\��oca�/// � __ _ 9-P / § � tie oho < �/S'oh \` G� \ Y♦ �. ': t ' Ro r0 ot� q/h h@ o^ 06 .( Of �(.�r0� � \ �On O .6~'9 ♦ \ `fi \\` U. �_ ^ s Jr6e / % � _ /j./�/,,�if� N �- I �`\ I y,ly''•F a' \�// oA \ ` J E Cl `c / / ��/, � / - _ - \ Or\mr ♦ ` �� ate,`\ '� ♦,\ � \ \` i m r � m r OCA�P\\ "o �`\ mho \ < q oh v v a ONa (jo + \\ q^`Y \ of \\ \ ° ami ami gg4Pa O�• // \\ ,p`(`r` I oRn iD /: + 1 a \\ 9O^N� d �9h0 ` \\ K Q ¢ UN' \ '(y sar ¢• / .�'N"F /� 2P'♦ i \\ 1-PA q O^.1 \\ ^.� \ II � � /O @ Z N m ° / •/ FO(e�apP/ 0r \ + I \\ e-Ps �/ 9 \ \ or �� \\o 9 a c \ Lu GO \\ \/C,.y' a\eOP1T�9 O 1 `� +� O AµwLU / I \` 9T.J 'r , ♦ \ ` - + a ��\ �. X06 \ �\ \, / 4 m 3 r1Or U\y I �„ �' o^ /' `\\ \♦ - '' 0�� / O ,Z( O / or f • I \\„ 9a°s 6E \96P \y/ I \ <' \\ G�/'^•: 7�,6 \\ ', \ _ /Q Q q Je^/ �� \\ ♦', slo, % /� W J Z Z) hamsP (:L QQO LL ,+ V XX F N Q if O / Ot\`� I4w \\` // y-�, \ J♦a\�aoo�' 1 ~ m ° I I \ \\\ _ - / 9P ~ z '- `l / y -- - - - - N Z w Q o 3 OC F J'4Jt\�'�•C \ P U o a I� _ \ Or UNI \ \\ /' /' \\ \Jd/ 9T.J / •w + `� °° / I eleepingrO0FTo \ \ 00 (h GEN \ \\ /�/ •r\\ly \\\ 9-P9 6 > IZ / 11\\\ / \\` a N ISI Q 001I `\\ \ �OC�•�5U \\ ' r / 1 \\\\\\ \\ O ( J z Z (4 C O ; � O 3 m \ \` \',,` \ �{Zi 9-•N ^ N S°j \ -',moi• ` / / / / // `\ p 21 ° \ ```\ 9•Jv q�t�0�65 O^ <OF \ 0 3 \ ``\ �•T�, 3 r' I , ® + uNIT 14 W A \ moi/ e</° ^3 s \ ` G/ \6leoping INS /n � zT-TP 4-N✓ // u // / 66P / b am .A \ ]N9 ® 17 r v, / o-m \ \` ♦\,, � * I ` 16 � � . / 1 / 90-PH T� e-Pe eloepml3 romeB I fJ + a\a°y ��' \\, ', eu •li ., i' / 1 ale -9 I7 `\\ Opine ` ` _ ` / LAb'LI b Sa '• \ �1"iij.n; _ orlla r- --1 /��\ TRA it InNT PQOTEL 1 �u ♦7�w�y. / n �!' AF PRIV MA E LEGEND -7- 1 �+*t°�/ ♦ g5' o // /pr QINING {{q^ i RE9 R5 1 FI I n bb y➢5^v. iV ° EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 9h o^ '\, ♦', n \t`\Jtl`,U \\' \` B / g �9. // I / � ' ee2asa " ,•Be°]roles a •��/sH // //// I \`. '�i / // = JAPANESE PLANTINGS(BY OTHERS) '0� 0y�C , \r((` (�0 . > \\ '\ \, ,.,, [+',`• \ \ \ / eeP Ir '+'{ / @•p,,�� I ` \ LIMIT O 0 /0CLEARINGF G<RGARDOINUGND, \ 1 ` ZVI DISTURBANCE . \p rP % w� \ ,.` �9.+r ' Nei ape+e•1= poLPHIN , lO0 / OC d\ . \ i Iz 9 e cwsTr=x 7\11,T� • ` �. ` _oN'\dC %'C�� \ \. , + \ \ // .+] / POND/ �3' 0& cWsre, `\ ''• ,'\ \ / \c f`399 PLANT SCHEDULE A � y --------- \ 0 i pp COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT + , ry�0 TREES aTY SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME 9 k AMELANCHIER LANADEN919 SERICEB9iRY 6110.W. BIB `\ `•\ `\ / / + // (II.T) Wb �\ \ % �I i y�Y�,, / (� ]D N9 NY59A 5YLVATILA 9OM6Bi 25'-9'CA- BIB ` `\ II ♦ // i / 4" cb (IBA) V' 7' ll/ 1 / `� / \ rQ I'�/6'T 21 aL OIERLIL L➢LLIIE/, SLARLET L/JC ]5'-9'CA.. BSB / \ / p 1 r / W .\ ` q, / q,0E0 �Q. pz,91 '�- '� 9y WE7LAND5 LINE AS LINEATED BY 1 j / v / z 9J 9LRaRA JAPONICA AEaENT' RE W SCHOWRT•EE 25^a'CAL. BL5 \, \�f\`\ . I COASTAL ENVIRONME TAL < LOGATEI7 BY I2 SH 5ALIx HI 6OLveN vinff`l a Hlu-ow ]s•-B'CAL. B4B „A \ \'\, .\, ¢ \ /,p + � A9'9q I� YOUNG t YOUNG ON 8 26/03 A? rF , \ / �G �s� ryh° O4.T) ` ` ` O'•(4, \` _L OL H(/"'� (5.4) Od ,// ID LD cEDRLS➢EODAM EVERGREENS DEODAR+i CEDAR 615,HT. B�8 \y \ \{ \ Ip) (I. / '\ I// \ I j I i / �9 , / k'p';\ GYTf SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT ♦ + \ L 0 (O.U, �T \ ____J / \\ , + POOL 6 05 W LRYPTOMERIA JAPONICA JAPANESE CRTPfOIHERIA b'-e'HT. BSB pp 6 ' N e0 JV JMIPER5 VIP6INIANA BA9TERN PFD CPDAR 6b'HT. BTB � \\\<e+'y , ,, \ �.p� \\ // / � � + ,. TTTsss 9 _ BWI9 CIA)'/ ` +Ib+9L59 Ise �Ty[C\'U / / \tel// 'I5 PA FIOFA AGES NORHAY 9PP9LE bb'HT. BTB \ \ \.` 1 \\ LL 199-NN 02'T) A9 + +Ib] \ % / fQ 09 F9 PIN199lFaBIY BABTERN Mira PIIS S.AL. LOM. - \ `` ` _L O 1.64+L6a.T2 46 1P TJJA R.ICATA WESTERN APBORVITAE 61e'HT. BIB \ "\. ,. \ \ MA \\ / / ly / O ^ `� / I_L (99) +1.99 / d � \ �\ \ loc-.•A i/ (H.4) �'`,�, +]Ae« '� 0`• \� . LLLL MASONRY PATIO % 1.95 +5.4!. 9'9 bA ]AO+ 9. / °o 393 \ b/ / �1 6 (125) 2AI T2+ yYj ,y % i `'.\ ., \ /;' (9A) ( Al _/I,F / '2B 2�5YY 31D+9.29a \ / %/ %/ � // � � N^Y O SHRUBS a`�•� ` ` \, �� \` as C.Y \�,y9 (IOD) / �a // 2.T6+9b4♦ / / �/ d OTT SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT P' ` ''}- q� tt""-- 0 `, oo° /� T-LJ \ (9.41 tY Sr• 1.94+ 0.�92?4A5 / / If ITB As AME-1A 6RvmFLaRA 6LossY AMELIA ..AL. cCNr. ` \ \ Y S1 / h / \ \` ,\ \ �y / 00°00➢° �+ s?yaa�.�.B] �- _ _ ' // °Jry O d M tiw ld 40 LA LOTONEA9 AFIU TA CRANEERRY COTDNEASTER 96AL. CCW. ` \ y (e / O C ° 0.95 '' / 5O H9 HIBI9CU59YRIACW 809E OF 9XARON 4-5'W. GONi. \ `\ `,./' " + \ °o°°� \ ��/ o o°o°o°o°/o°o°o +➢ .1M3' qA 2 �� \` ., \ M co°o°°°000�o.T OL10 99.09 67+°355 ]o % / .S\ / I •� v a + 194 MP MYMaA K50YLVANICA NORTHERN BAYBERRY 9'-V HT. CONT. ^O 2 21 PC PRUNES CISTENA FLRPLE LEAP 9AND CHB9RY 9'-V'M. COM. iC/ Oh \�T\, ` + ` e O 1T77�� a o po woDo�o ° z 9 /• �«6,69 IST / //jn'�� / �( r1' a d Ci al.d W G / N o°000�•oo°o o z.a3 +I.sa �> / m•ry a \\ \.,\ ., + \\ O p p0 \�\\\ / °oo°o;,oy}�°oo BE PM PRUNUS tMRITNA BEACH P.IM 96AL. LLNi. ♦\p \, YN9 / O o ° ° ° .2.9 /J) / 'S `Y 9 e o o o o 0 o k' 9 d+ 'B O o 0 0 ° +1.4] 199 / m O �o S 3/ o ° ° ° o ° ° \ / % Ib w VIBIRtLM TONEMC9IM DOUBLEFILE VIBIIRWM 9'i'FT. cONi. q.A o^ �h/G \ `. \, TRANSIENT / °OpOpODOOODO�j�° °f AJ�An� 2.9 + / / 7yQ 1 0 000.060.00016�,y� c o S �1 16 F A e Ie rw M16°.A FLaw➢A OI.➢PA9HILNED 1,04BA B6AL. 64M. -� .41 CO O/ ,y, \ \ ,, \ \ MOTEL /' I.a]t6+ J� / t�ABoe '{� \b.DS• a oro a / 1•p ry / PERENNIALS t VINES S \ \ '\,, \ s c a n o 0 o c / ♦]'@ vp aTY SYMWLI BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 512E ROOT .. O^ ` ♦ + `\ °0��Ht °°o°t54°° 1AII " 55 M9 M15GANTU99INBN9I5'S4IACIWlN`9' MAIDEN 6RA99 96AL. CONT. \ II " 5, ', \ �O°O°° 000 ♦ / YY\'C' / I ^ b j 6B NN NPPONANEBLM NPPONCNH MONTFUK➢A9Y B SAL. COM. I . yt ,,o � ,Q. 19T PH PENWSETM IDES ➢WARP Fd AIN bRA55 96AL. LOM. '. J '1�' y� \ \ `\ ` / °°°°90°°"° � �'C"r O fM_! J/ 6 \ .` ` \ ` ^" ( tY I+Irri� °0oo°lcoo° NOTE AB AMMOFHII.A BREVILIWLATA' APE MAY CAPE AMERILAN EEAc16RA55 W. NOT2 1.WANIW SHALL BE AT OWNERS RE04DT ` ( IJb gn `\ `\ \ °•��i/j�O p°0°° / Iql T� - „_ '� V�-J° ,f°� /J`(�'(�' ' ` \♦ )\ \ 00 jCyfo�oc°o / � \<•. I� w.'O.. CIA5TTQRR �.,,.•;`. ,�.7 - Qe), ``5 "` ',', + \ / J Tli '1'• 1,/ DECIDUOUS TREE > \ ♦. N\ \' u o 0 0 0 v c c rf/' U' ,��(\4•/ I A .•I [b \ , ++ / -L '0'00°r X000 / Q"-/I ROMAINE oY W NOTES: 'GL_ •c\,j' \ '\, , '0000°oo°o°qoo". / q)v- (za)\♦ euLKHEAD BEL mlr nuv O ¢° REMOVE ALL PLASTID 6 WIRE TAGS L1�_ \H!'\pl LrII EVERGREEN TREE ` `. \ ` //I /•;j °°o°o°°°o"n'A�B °°<bo°, z� / A% (TO BE RE 0) REMOVE ALL PLASTIC CORDS FROM � ' l l'�1-pp \�/ ` + ` °o°o°o°o��°`l1"0°0°0" / + '�j ♦ �{ Q� a TREE BALL, IF PRESENT W'�=- Wr,\Y _ .<J- MULCH TO BE KEPT AWAY FROM \ \,\ ,., I_N9 `\ ooc:�o°ub oo°, / �� rya) a♦♦ S,V /l ✓/ .v ( �.1.`'!/��f TREE TRUNK IN GROUPINGS OF SHRUBS, EXCAVATE lF� l 'vI `� SHREDDED BARK MULCH ® 3" DEPTH AND BACKFILL ENTIRE SHRUB ''wl-`^�'-I=.. �' ' o ° BED AREA N/PREPARED BACKFILL `"1 L�%-�'� 1 I_ SOIL SUACER TOP WMNLGH \ v o�o°a" MIXTURES. `\�'ti4 a ` \ . 000° // p♦ � p � v k S" DEEP SHREDDED BARK MULCH - - ;; 1' ROOT BALL .,�,`.1 SCARIFY ALL SIDES OF PLANT PIT \\D`'j, my »q \ 2-h5 ` 15J i r / (15) ,�� 4-) > PLANTING BACKFILL MIXTURE .\ �-� `" ; / 7% O � 'o NOTES: To- To-HIP ' // (4.0 vaLPHIdV A\ 1-11 ETI- _ 'I�IeI + REMOVE ALL PLASTIC, AND WIRE TAGS. \ R 9�P1'I 4G<<1y4, / cwsTERtl,p r, • •P-4 E v/ PLANTING BACKFILL MIXTURE K - . REMOVE ALL NON-DECOMPO5IBLE CORDS AND \ ce r,,e", ,' ,('•_ / G 51 m y i) lif ).;?ti';I I,; I - BURLAP FROM THE ROOT BALL, IF PRESENT. ,• A N -IN- DO NOT EXCAVATE LOWER THAN + DO NOT CUT BURLAP FROM 51PES OF n ¢ g:•I- - = BALL DIA. _ BALL DEPTH. 11LI'I I- II BALL D THE ROOT BALL. \ / eA) r 1••I N -III -I + SET TOP OF ROOT BALL I" ABOVE \ ,� / 0N FINISHED GRADE, \ \/� IAF ,7,\ // N.N.10 •- SHRREMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SOIL OR UB DETAIL TREE DETAIL b NTS • ` k°O// DRAWING NO.: MULCH FROM THE ROOT CROWN AREA. / NTS 1 * REMOVE ALL WIRE 5A5KET5 FROM . / rib) 1 ROOT BALL, IF PRESENT 6 m B / J K I zowo 000ywwzu� Q'arz -zww=mxc� WwtLw w¢"173 Cl C o a U n 1r-owc 'Ini�wioa-!n MgaN"jO'w1xM-w=w �¢Vx Zwnwa oko ZZOFO°UN,ocmmrn„�,_¢oQyvwUOllwM1aw��¢rowc�Ziz ILL Q znM M 0d•rr"o•'CETX3 lnooa o o6sawzEoo STONE DR. "•" so 0 GILLEI TE DRIVE Lot 4 a - $ M c%1 -T- - C7 coyZ 0 CO ZONE R40 �� Fz 1s 0 pR _ z� � � W ¢ � E0m STONE I cL o m _ C J0- Lot Z V Lot 6 ILJ� 0- Lol8 Lot? H Lots 0 CG Lot 70 I W >- W U W Q �R w¢ p.il pit 41 ail du ¢iI nm am pm om 2 Q IA V O NI I �iN3 N GRASS PAVERS GRA55 PAVERS °' 7 LAND-BANK REQUIRED PARKING J aN p.;6 a x.17 an ¢15 0i3 all aw par ° s I PARKING SPACE FOR 5 RESIDENCES U SLIDING GATE N o ROCK JETTY ¢n aia x39 p31 ¢id 1s ai3 ¢n pa9 2 H'1 40 1� aD C3 m z (SPEAKER E TOUGH! PAD OPERATED) - I Oltpis pia 60 ass x33 pn 63 011 6.01 40 49 0.07 0. ' i 0.20 0, ' �r pp \\ OP p5s p9 0ia 0 ail p.l) 0.11 a, lar tin A nit ail 6i pia ail 4 .OS ,f0 0. S1 1 S 0 I 5 1 210 f.70 2N 1. 1A9 1.79 250 2.51 1.61 2.69 2P 251 270 O.BI - „x75 ,2 310 3.1 3.10 L .114 1 3.23 3.1 3.16 1 + + ! • ♦ + ♦ � pta x9 731 pso pis aal ptfi am ' • _:_ ¢x aw nil a + + ' + ' + V. --e--+- - a-♦'-£-' �' �-i a ,! r' 't + ! ♦ ♦ ♦ s ;I I '# a 'd '' i a h. +' . + 1 tAp 2 219 a 1 0 ¢N n1! Y 0.' 0 ,I 1255- . 1 AO�v10' S 3'17-5 3 9 07 51T 5,11 1, 1 221 A6- 3 6 .171 Ilfi 2 I 1 7 1A p. 1 1 216 asfi Ise pdE N CC 5 ' L 1 07 0 S 099 05fi 0.59 4,S 2 1 1.4 .Ifi 0.55 057 0.43 04 OU 079 036 0 5 L11 zU 9a Lii 2'a 0 0. M 0.10 OA6 0 056 .41 0 0 OA7 0.31 0.32 O7E 019 0 0.43 01fi I 111 z31 1TI a.il , , ' -rv•;� , • , , , ♦ , , , , , , , , . , , , . , , :1 a. 205 Tal Z41 941 D. 0, i y, 0.73 0.74 0.fi1 ON 6. � 0.34 0.11 6.41 O'.`JB'::.:;OeY4;;�;�.N O.SI 0.39 0,31 0.32 037 OA1 0.31 01fi 0J27 0J1fi 0.+31 O 7 0. O.fi3 .21 2 3. 31 1.9 2 Ofi3 076 019 0.31 0.30 0.26 0.40 a OS5 0.30 0.26 025 015 0.19 0.116 0.17 021 024 023 O.le O.A 0.14 0.17 0.10 0,10 6,14 0.13 0.13 O.Ifi 1 0.1fi 0.11 1 ♦.y+ t-... , 10-0 -O,Ir �9�.3 { aN o 2se z J 7 0.55 0.43 0,30 0.1 0 0.16 0.15 O.ifi 0.19=�i :p.22 076 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.11 6. 1 0. 0 0.7fi- . .OS .60 09 013 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.25 0.55 030 4 021 0.14 W9 0.08 0A0 0.077 0.07 0.07 0,07 ON 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 O.Ofi 0.05 OS 0,05 0.0 ,OS O.OS O.W \ LV '7 U z +; r:iira:T_ NI ¢m aY p''9 Q$ lip 2 z11 .:S1ii1!�U. / i s is3 is .i2 6i3 0 °o \ 21c \ $ as na ail on a6 zu a� p� Iiz U D / \ pia RS all x16 pA .11 9N tal T 0 v J 2.a 4x7 3 s a.+2 al4 as 00 t7 pia ail all ¢1S pAl OA ia 1.11 i p59 Z i0 21 629 a 0 D ^ < \,\ au a o 9 pu a'o pil pEa ¢sl ¢W aia V! 111 0 0. 1.54 50 70 021 0.0 s; C ` Oa x13 a(i 0.41 QI6 p,N pA1 ¢IO 0»7 p11 =, J z oM pd1 au pip x16 & pis O ' IA 66 O fi 0 . -u .. �.- 1 / \ \/ a.a Ism 1a zil 11a) o Bia & & Cis Sao ,r' M:, toc \/ V \ J _ U_ 220 ? Q Q 0 1.5 S� '�.39 039 0.12Se`fix I" `;1,g. 1 a,1e 9N za iu I;N pig pdf pi6 pip W > z GRA55 PAVERS 1 4.7. ( aa O1B 0.f1 �. an Is l.n lae 1.i1 pia ¢11 pia pA v Q d 3 C C.r, '4 y' , �C 1e z11 iz se a3s ,,41 aIp u an p11 < 2 0 01fi 0.10 D P;;yr, Ir.Av}�+y' �.„, ad C1) 0 rn I.- 0.22 - 00 z� �.uS �� 'w'x� � I \ 0 111 1.f9 ♦N 111 a p3! OP a9 a 1 II 6T 0.zr x10 ° \ �'` n, t°' /� 19c \ aia zie ia IS os pa as 013 .gf.l X14 0,10 o4 .(6 12C / \ I '\ av aii p41 piz p;9 pm OR 1 4'0 27` '"'daoUlan CIS /(p/( all p11 aio WI 044 p0 ¢R 1.S 5� 3.39 fi 0.301D12;:g1, °0 a all Oa pA p,N 0.M I 118 ad1 + : llif:;H+, C, / \ Oil 011 Om pn 0 160 Sri 2U I'm iL ZONE MII a;t ail /ia ni 041 ;l 1 1, a 2N z 3 477 \ 20c cf) 1, a 1. 0.21 0.10 "I _ \ - \ nil nir as nia oil 1➢ I� l41 in IW O 27 LAND-BANK PARKING SPACES I�I '1. D 19-003 -` \ tiS Q z z A �'01-020-0.00 • ' �- aii air oia old a! + 211 zie w '' p k \ 313 4101 ,1 ~ ¢ m / \ x.13 0.11 Oa ald 0.N ail 1.61 241 31e tdr N O 'O \ \ \ all a;d 011 ail n9 als 4 zit iN ' GRAVEL ROADWAY « ♦ ! 1 -` " '- .: al5 aA 015 61 pit 09 ¢id D39 pY x40 W 0.16 011 011 03E 41 633 4N Gia h f 1 - ,''`�-��`.'*-•• \ \ \ x18 a9 aA 0 • a!I 0.11 a pa J 23p .it 0.ie d.oi 8b _ xr 73c \ ca nll Cis o 4 f i 1:0 ale xis U o 241 ase all IIIt 5 ♦ 0. .01 1 ', 0-' "`„�"' - \ % __ �._-__-__� pa1 N9 to 1• ) 141 k all oil ~ 4 60- I /� AT26r682 ail p zil ' i 014 ail / \ \ I ' J o 376 1# ' .1 ' 6' 0.2f-H1A7 'S`' \ • FIRE \ / qy�, 07p ¢u xlx t. + 19 a l 011 OS BUFFER / j \ 631 On IW tis x41 lia ¢1t a5 all RESIDENITAL 4i1 11, �3' 67ra6r � 7b .��.1�1;�' � � HYDRANT BUFFER n" ', a � ' #t'`r`,; N 0,23-O, FIRE "'�h" / / I 019 as I 211 EN 09 011 li _ i ¢Ir ait Oi0 i•A 6N a9 ¢1a 0. I I �2 ' � 0,57'i0.0e HYDRANT � ) < / � �NN�1 1 ais oi9 as nv xis azs p� 016 a4 a 1 Y / / N• n;2 a;fi p;1 00 pia all pit 010 ail ala WOOD BULKHEAD + 77c 405 ��r I 0.05 -.Y:"''M' / ' 4GBII�-- M1725'"IN - 4.39 4,42 I.1 �7 P.17-I 0.05 �� `t d \ ( �N 1 ZONE R40 I V4 0.570.06 I 00 S. � � N.R I WALKWAY I 1.14 I " gt Nau 2 DETAIL �. ?r; C Ao 93 9e _ I I C-� SCALE: " = I0'-0" + � oe FLOATING DOCK i3 � 8,-0ii - 3®'-0�, 56,,0u Q 4 51 f. 67 , "' { � q�3 OPTION - &x1OO' (SLIP I) (SLIP li) yl` • �+ + « r -q - lit ,1 11 1 ��F'• 1`�SJ 154 150 1 ♦ + 6b I I ` )OD EAD PRIVATE MARINA (SLIP 5) M1� d e. + ♦ •-•- .: s- s- (SLIP 4) (SLIP l2) e ly ' a _ _4 AREA-6Q2BfAC ES FL FLOATING DOCK HEDGE ROWS i . 025 0 O 0.5q � - '�� OR 1.3662 ACRES { t, 7011E LI OPTION - 8'x150' L , L l� 1 �-!SLIP 5) (SLIP 3) + ' 5b I` 7 '.- a.�twe �1aa.a..-sN>�„��_.. LAWN 027 0, 1 5A6 751 1. 426 _ '� (SLIP 6 (SLIP 14) 0.10 OA 0 6 25 _ �lY`T ♦ s�, m NEW DOCK 6.00 x 10.0'D PILINGS41- t '• GOLF CART W 6' R � '�-«, : - ^`-,-'e"�",, , 15C :'" (SLIP -U (SLIP IS) RETAINING n\Si` PARKING - 6SPACES kV .M an a. t.fi / _5* 0 WALL 4,';✓ SIGN 'GOLF I'OS w7 05 991 " . \ ab - \ i CART1 ♦ ! - / ,� CALCUIX110NSUMMARY- / PARKING ,N \ Z - Q��` E JIMENSIONS G EAVE MAX MW ONLY' .17 0. 2 2 1. 1! \ O \y�n� LuRgtPit Lal New e+> LB 5,6 0.7 '( + w / d ELEV: +4.0' ---\ zs ao �:u LwiLnPkgLpl NeWGtla <n 2.9 TIO- 0.5 0,9W ELEV� C43'� 40 66 9.5 RAMP UP- ,,� \ � I \\y r'" T,�1 TaH PN APkgL 7AA61eilFt NBwGad <♦v 2,0 5.2 OS i ♦ + ♦ + e a" - d , Ni ` ` A yy OUTDr3� P 91A1 ewOdd ay 0,9 0.5 O.0 r/ .1 4dC L10 1 LN 1.2fi 1 y TERRA E1;, T 0.7 Q" h m + . ♦ \ "` I" \ \1 G� 1Tpatwdy NUGdd 1.0 A.6 0.1 3 41fi 114 EE3f / \ I Un,. h ♦ ♦ ♦ I ��, B.6 4.B 0.1 / lC� WMINMRESCHEOULE i TYP SYMBOL 6E5CRI 0 LAMP LUMENS rM NTINNALAST LLF TY 4i4 4.06III 1j ',``' &1 W.S. CNIlECN70WMHTypa5 42'0,!!x" 5 V)-BSO7-3SA3-IWO0MH (1)M-701UIMED 5500 0.62 • 1 + 1♦ + + IU1 ` - Si-2 I .S.ARCHITECN 175WMH 1YPE2 N'SSSPOLE 2fi ! + SED 6.0' H (`-' .I9 2,51 I♦ 492 14 + .♦ F W _ O 1� t `i q1)M-VR841WWH (1)16-175C.1-11011 1200 NIA 0.59 518 W.S.,MiCHHEC'N 175WMH TYPE314'55SPOLE 4B i(l)N3•VR5'I1kI75MH (1)IM70-HOR 1200 NIA 0,0 I B ♦ 55a ,�� H '� ;;rTz; 51-4 I ARCHITECTU175WMHTVE4 A'SSSPOLE 1 ((1)N4•VHS-N-17511H (1)M-17EN-0OR 1200 NIA 0,59 51-5 5. CHI7ECTU175WMHTYPE5 14'S59POLE 2 wwTF �� / uh-y (1)N5V145•V-Mi75MH (I)M-175N-HOR + 1200 NIA 0.59 PA ♦ h + ♦ + CONTROL I. OA ROOM ♦ E ! + LAB AREA per, 15 LSh I. 510 2. 1. 5.0 1.10 I. 170 1U3 0.7 /% fr�`�� 0.72 ., I. 59fi 3 3 1291 I 6. as / G1 { SITE PLAN KEY 20'-0" 1 67 066 0 fil 46 1. IAS 49 3.36 f. 35 011 0.13 0.13 0.11 0,12 415 411 02 0,11 0.15 0.17 0.16 0,f1 409 0.11 07 � '.^�E�r (LANDSCAPE + ♦ + r E' ♦ « ♦ ♦ ! O.W M 0,02 O I. .S9 2 I 1 ,10 -1 .7 0.30 9 4 0.36 �9 0. 018 0.31 7 ' SYMBOL BUILDING DESCRIPTION BUFFER FROM � 4 I I S RES.DISTRICT) ,07 .4 ♦ �! + + ♦ • la 1+ + 2 1, a0741 911 90 12 91 N O,Sfi E 2.Ifi 3. 1.a 0� 0.70 1 + + ♦ 092 X11:'1 ♦ + ♦ ♦ + + -♦ + +1 + < + + ♦ + a + ♦ ♦ ♦ y � , ♦ ♦ + + + ! « + + + « a + ♦ ♦' ♦ ♦ ♦ �'��- B TRAN3BN7'MOTEL 4& 50 4 .D7 + I. 1.60 5.67 4 R2 1r " A 1 4 51 15 5& 1. 1 74 561 4.01 19 19 09 N 567 404 1 9 �1 9 4. 1 I 41 2 7 5y?I A. 6B l: ��$ O , + Ei IORr a. + al ♦ r « + r + A Fi ♦ h ♦ + qq p 5 + + + ♦ ♦ ! ♦ ! ♦ a ♦ ♦ ♦ + a + &♦ ♦ r ♦ a (e: p L 1 E537 .9 1, 1 0, 7.55 C 9 ' .b I 3 059 O.N 0.09 1.17 1. 5.1 fi10 3.14 1 1.0 .92 I. 0,91 N 0.0 1. 091 97 0.90 0.91 .071 0,0 I 1 0,50 .03 57 119 fiy?WT © FIVE UNR'S SLEEPING ROOM t 4,0 LN & 0.8 0.75 0.76 0.6 Q71 .M IAt 127 3 5,55 550 .I �15 .1 7 '0 9975 0x3 O.ie 0.76 0.71 OA5 LOe 1 ,5 .56 L. 1.0 O. D.N 0.60 0.76 4 0.I 0.76 O,M 478 0.75 1 0. 0�1 .7e 0.ifi 0. 0.71 0,71 0.01 0.78 0.75 0, Q 1 4 091 0.11 0.73 0. 0.70 49fi 1 0 56 5.59 3,7 .49 Ob9 O.N 1 1 2.0 516 ':t,!�� GL S' E a 6 « ! ! ♦ a + + ♦ + ! ! + + + + • a a ♦ .-'r-� r,�;: OC THREE 1"4119 BLEEPING ROOM 1 1. .fifi 53 0.71 7 1.60 . I 0 0.02 A7 0.01 5fi 056 ,9 097 I. 0.�7 4 + + + + + ♦ a ! + R�LD T ♦ ♦ + + + + + + e + + + + ♦ + a + + n` 15 AH,;i�Li F N . W .Fop. 0.76 A7 0. 0.1 OA 0.7 0,77 07 - - F v --♦----+- -+--+ 77tAMl0�Ni MOTEL PRIVATE 0.51 0 1 i. .i I .1fi1 1.09 0.91 0.9 0. .01 1101 115. 1.2 1 ,37 I. 1.0 1.69 0. 0, .0 1A>6 0,761 0 1 B 2. 2 2. I�0 e 1 �2 f 01 .IO 0. !I 1 4 0 T.OS 4 1 it 0 ,0 1 W 0, LI 299 1.1 17 .Ifi 1 I. QCT; O GARDEN WALL + ♦ « ! + + + ' ♦ 1-4 ♦ a + ♦ ♦ �q + + + + p 3 p + I R a ♦ 4� a `-T E + + + + a + + ! (PRIVATE FC DIMNGHALL 0.31 LO .0 1.57 .1. 1.i A 4,11 1.57 7, 40 4.05 1. 2. 1 414 4.71 2.0 0.96 0.7 4.50 4fi 2 0.95 0.7 0,75 4 t.4 41fi 3.fi6 .glfi I 3.8q41 0 3.83 1.15 75 06 S 4.77 0. 51 4.57 4.30 0 44 457 4:w 0. .57 .41 4.51 470 0.3 ,07 .b 4.51 1.30 0.6 I.1 3. .576 1. 0. 01 1 3,57 3,73 1,S A '��,�}rel (PRIVATE FIESTAURA7dT)ANNEX .16 69 Bfi Qi fi .10 776 0. O6 1.14 3.71 0, 41 20 311 .Ifi 329 0.7 5 .13 3,75 0.7 4 .50 4 3.+97 .Ifi .57 1�fi 1 + l7 4.1 .i1 0. 4720. 7.72 4. .70 0. 3.72 / .N I 33 9.110. 2 41s 124 12 ASPHALT PARKING O COVi RED DECK 1A14 0 G TE •92 .89' TNA T• r<~�:r\?).•( (1i{js.tl' ' /I AREA SERVICE "355119 ENTRY02O MANAGERS RESIDENCE 1�"1 NO e MAIN ENTRY (SPEAKER EOGH FENCE GROWS HIGH WATER MARK n !Ipv O POOL HOUSE '- '- PAD OPERATED) ((-"%i I Y m SHIPYARD LANE MAINTENANCE Arra U7'IM BUILDING t1 ROOK COVERED GAZEBO 1 0 z 1�Ia,i p K K K y D D D GUIDE RAIL O GAZEBO v �4 C9- d Z Z rpt t :. w y Q O 0 `r1I} O GAZEBOS iX ,I ~ ALL PARKING LEFT OF n NEEDY CIRCLE HE ZONE RR 9 BE PROVIDED VIA VALET SERVICE EXCEPTT WHERE �r U b W }� mo • u U z Oy 1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN W "� C'7 SCALE: " = 4a'-0" DRAWING NO.: SEE 6-2 FOR LOCATION MAP AT I"=100.0' ZZOWI/I T°�oyW WK Q>O ¢L�W JZI-W�I=/lOZ}ZN v (� w�Zj W) L¢S z lAW4W �OZm gt W<mz o�zo �ozoQz�oo 'Z3 c�0 _I— �7r�m fL OI¢jI¢AAW�OZ�W K ~ Wm�¢WFZ zr^<�-J' o-JI z<'Zmco F?¢Q3 UQE¢r.�Z�UO cc 0 a 9oIll $ � N mU U U S� °� UW WFFOWCO r ` NE W z2co 0 N oaJ�F CLOZ w N N 4 e z 7 h f0 n OD 0) N � 671.59' _ — S3s22'OO-E — — — — — DEMOLITION PLAN KEY C o I'1 —_—_—_—_—.—_—_—.—_—_—_-----_—_—___---_—_—_—.—_-----_— 411 x Ell- sN'r�'� PROPOSED STRUCTURE z _—_---_—_---_—_—.—_.—.—_ led'> Saga t ' nf'Cw`^.,�F Q Y — SEE C-1 FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE PLAN v +zJ la 1 Q _ Q �", .�a PROPOSED HARD SURFACE ---� —� 19 BUILDING AND WALKWAYS F '1 � U 5 NOTE: 13 lw� 6`4S�NCK _ _ EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED O gr CHAIN LINK FENCE AND PLANTERS.DEMO ITEMS ON f {-P �P � � V Z PROPOSED SITE ONLY. SEE C-1 FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE PLAN \ 9�OE o D \ U I BUILDING AND WALKWAYS a ��y DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES J O 4V$• ' \ DEMO PLAN REFLECTS STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED.SEE CIVIL O W l \ AND MEP PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL 51TBUORK TIE.ROADWAYS, J Z - \ LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES! W O J N THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TO BE REMOVED = DLL D \ QI 2-STORY BRICK 1 CONCRETE BUILDING, FINQ G. EXISTINGISH FLOOR 6.99 W Q � z Z in METAL BUILDING. EXISTING FINI6H FLOOR lD8 3 Q O F- ° ,�,�, 4 \ 3 CONCRETE WALKWAY � \ Q REMNANTS OF CONCRETE STRUCTURE \ O5 CONCRETE BLOCK PUMP HOUSE 0 \ © REMNANTS OF CESSPOOL FIELD C :1 \ ' All, HOIST O ° DOCK m 61 z4N t%✓ -�-�. \ O9 METAL BUILDING o N o m O 10 MOVABLE CONVEYOR II OVERHEAD PIPE � o CHIMNEY v O SHED U t° CONCRETE STAIR 2254' A7. ,E E 6.4T26"Ese ,o SG16 \\ ¢ 15 CONCRETE WALL € 4 - I T APE 2E$�y?�,b. �. NI a IG FLAG POLE CHAIN LINK FENCE Vq ° O 9N�� 18 FRAME SHED b $� i N z 19 PLANTER S366522"E 97.59' 69.7740,66' PROPOSED I STORY STRUCTURE I. .-�.-".,� k's ' '-a / '�-� 3 N36'26'44'W N3752'70'W SEE C-1 FOR CONTINUATION OF 517E PLAN BUILDING AND WALKWAYS to \ �� h GENERAL DEMOLITION NOTES: ,� ,r.5 ;si' '\ W SIDE YARD / R `-,�, �, *, '.• £1. -\ W NW904'57'W SETBACK N36'3235'W 76.35 11.80' I. REMOVE STRUCTURES,PARTITIONS AND FLOOR AREAS AS INDICATED ON THE REMOVAL DRAWINGS. ALL CEILINGS AND r ,,�, , {rpm' MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED. 'sr w4 N / �xsa�"; �` ,_.'�"' r _ t� ?3• �,. NQ 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAREFUL STUDY OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO DETEF?11NE THE F -I W LOCATION AND EX75NT OF ELEMENTS TO BE REMOVED. PRIVATE MARINA I I 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND VERIFY THE EXTENT AND LOCATION OF SELECTIVE DEMOLITION REQUIRED. all I I A CAREFULLY IDENTIFY THE LIMITS OF SELECTIVE REMOVALS. I I I 4 27 A IF ';� B. MARK INTERFACE SURFACES A5 REQUIRED TO ENABLE WORKMEN TO IDENTIFY ITEMS TO BE LEFT INTACT. SEE C-1 FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE PLAN 20 4. PREPARE AND FOLLOW AN ORGANIZED PLAN FOR THE I BUILDING AND WALKWAYS aREMOVAL OF ITEMS. $ 1 A SHUT OFF,CAP AND OTHERWISE PROTECT EXISTING UTILITY LIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAFE PRACTICE AND REGULATIONS OF UTILITY iy, _ f5,-��N.:.a '. 32 1 1� - COMPANY. "" ,.. �_ � � B. COMPLETELY REMOVE ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED AND 50 REMOVE LEAVING AC55 CAN,SOLID RECEIVE NEW MATERIALS SPECIE ED ELSEWHERE. D READY TO 3 \ G IN ALL ACTIVITIES COMPLY WITH PERTINENT REGULATIONS OF 10 �\ - N3556'24W 200.09' 1 GOVEIRNMENTAL AGENCIES AND BUILDING MANAGEMENT HAVING JUR51D1CTION. G� - - - - -- _ I�- _ - - - __ 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE PROPERTT OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE. 1-4 3 I 6. USE MEANS NECESSARY TO PREVENT DUST FROM BECOMING A 0 a '�- 3 I I NUISANCE TO THE PUBLIC,TENANTS AND TO OTHER WORK BEINGLL PERFORMED ON OR NEAR THE SITE. 1. IN THE EVENT OF REMOVAL ITEMS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED, I I PROMPTLY REPLACE SUCH ITEMS TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECT AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER OR THE CLIENT. 1 o • t I I�I8. REVIEW ALL MECHANICAL,ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING DRAWINGS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DOCUMENTS AND PROVIDE ALL REMOVALS AS L --- II 9. PT ONCOMPLETION OF GENERAL RAL DEMO WONOTIFY ARCHITECT x ' 9 - -. - FOR IN5PECTION TO REVIEW LOCATIONS OF NEW OPENINGS TO BE I il 444 ; a UTILIZED FOR NEW HVAC.WORK I , � ,�,^ `T `� -,- -, � - - - J � 10, CONTRACTOR TO CAP OFF AND REMOVE ANY ABANDON H.VA.C. 1 "-- '•_ — _•- ->- -.- -.--:- -,- -.- -.- -•-- � :Rats ,r, .- -.— .- -.- -. —.--.- -. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. l 12 r - - - L J ISEE C-1 FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE PLAN BUILDING AND WALKWAYS l I II I 4 7 + — —"— —'— — — —x L - -- - - - --.] - - - - - �L _J i L--- - - - - - - --- - - -- 4 1 - - �- -b — -- - - -- 11 — / 1 3 �/ 13 --t �----------------------------------------------------------- --- ----------------------'----------------- ------- — — — \ 1 / / // / 03 /�I_// 0l1 —°-- �/ N3551`I9'W 927,W � N O Wv Z ^ c O � T 0 1� ^ � U o SITE DEMOLITION C 4-) 0 (qC� 5CALE: P = 40'-m" w SEE O-2 FOR LOCATION MAP AT "=100.0' V t o N Z � N O � DRAWING NO.: (Q� C—V zn70 � -,YWwm J pp¢ t Q6 -¢ Fr Ww3- °W'a UN amOLLOyIjU2� b ) O u1Om9; - LLO ti � 6 ZwwtpQ Q gozoaZW zwwFm "� LLI ¢OOZ�� mz¢w�w H W o 6 �Z OJ��tiOQOK i-?6Q3 UQy�}}¢t��ippZ��pU tOpp O R O ^ O 0 DF Z $� 3N U U UsCljz z0 W z m Q 2 = co CICU N 11 z II �I I I � III Q a0 cs) Y I + ® O % TRM Sl�ff i W J o _1 O ZO MAINTENANCE L �- j/ z W U z H j/ > V DOCK / J z I WLINE HEEL PPRONT �_ JATH Q OO g co L�— \ I �— — — — — — —� �7 L �I II\ LL 30' INSIDE TURNING RADIUS. J 2 Q O -- - - - - - - - - - - - ry \\\ \ — —— — — TYPICAL _ EL — —— ———— — — —— — — — — — — — — — — —— —— — —— afA � 30' INSIDE TURNING I I ji/� � - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - --- - - - - - - -- --- --- - -- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - \ �\� � � O Q = 0 RADIUS.TYPICAL _ -- - - - - --- - - - - --- - --- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - \-�\�,� —rl ° 95 W _ _I 17TT TT 1 T - T TT / LINE OF REAR MAIN ENTRY RESTAURANT Z 3 SERVICE _ t+� WHEEL PATH WHEEL PAIN ENTRY O co m N 0 w Q z z OVERHEAP UTILITIES 251 DELIVERY — II VEHICLE.12' WHEEL N — — w BASE, 8.5' VEHICLE V a WIDTH TURNING RADII - DELIVERY VEHICLE (25-01) - ENTER SITE AND BACK-UP TO LOADING DOCK u t C. 9 SCALE: V, = 40'-V' O € 2 I � I I I I III I C TRANSIENT MAINTENANCE L �'- / j// �' o 0 LL ❑ LOADING DOCK I I LINE OF FRONT WHEEL PATH7 T TTT ji \ 30' INSIDE TUNING / / / _— —__ --------------.--__ / �� INSVDE TURNING RADIUS.TYPICAL - -�- - —— RADIUS.TYPIcgL _ _——_—— _- -- / / SERVICE LINE OF REAR MAIN ENTRY RESTAURANT HEE P T REENTRY / WHEEL PATH OVERHEAD UTILITIES 25'L DELIVERY VEHICLE. 12' WHEEL BASE, 85'VEHICLE WIDTH TURNING RADII - DELIVERY VEHICLE (25-01) - EXIT SITE C 9 SCALE: P = 40'-0" I m Q m� E� O J T � U o N > O a a T � N N � U n o ° N c ZW O N DRAWING NO.: C-9