Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Hydrogeologic Investigation Report Vol I Appendices
I I I I I I I I I I I PART 360 AND'PHASE II HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION REPORT Southold Landfill Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York VOLUME I - APPENDICES I I I Dvirka and Bartilucci Consulting Engineers OCTOBER 1991 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I $ I4660 PART 360 AND PHASE fl HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION REPORT APPENDICES VOLUME I SOUTHOLD LAI',O)F~.L PREPARED FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SU1/I~LK COUNTY, H YORK PRF_.PAR PlI") BY DVIRKA A.N'D BARTtLUCCI CONSULTING I~GII',{IF~:tJ~S SYOSSL:rr, NEW YORK. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C S14660 TABLE OF COHTEHTS Field Forms Data Validation Report Soil Gas Survey Results V Appendix A $1466C] A-1 - San-~le lnformztion Records A-2 - Chain of Custody Forms A-3 - Daily Field Activity Reports !! ! ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I 1 I I I SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: TIME: g:O0 am SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher MW-1S MH-1S-GW WEATHER: Overcast, Drizzle DATE: 7/25/gl TEMPERATURE: 80°F SAMPLE I~FPE: GROUND HATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 38.84 feet 53.24 feet MEASUREMENT METHOD: MEASUREMENT METHOD: g gallons REMOVAL METHOD: Water Level Indicator Hater Leve) Indicator Bailer DEPTH TO HATER: DEPTH OF HELL: VOLUME REMOVED: FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Reddish Brown TEMPERATURE (°F): 12.4°C pH: 6.14 ODOR: None SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): 210 OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorgantcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: 1-1/4" = 0.077 I-I/'Z' = 0.10 2' =0.16 2-1/2'.0.24 3" =0.37 4" = 0.6~ 3- I/'2' = O JO 6'= 814760/I SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: TIME: ]2:00 pm SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher MH-1D MH-1D-GN WEATHER: Overcast, Drizzle DATE: 7/25/gl TEMPERATURE: 80°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE HATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 38.68 feet 152.00 feet MEASUREMENT METHOD: MEASUREMENT METHOD: 73 gallons REMOVAL METHOD: Water Level Water Level Bladder Pump DEPTH TO HATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: Indicator Indicator FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°Fi: 12.1°C pH: 7.31 ODOR: None SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorgantcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: (]AL/PT 2" ~0.16 0.37 S 1476~/2 SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: MW-2S FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: MW-2S-GN TIME: 6:00 pm WEATHER: Sunny SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher DATE: 7/24/91 TEMPERATURE: 90°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: WELL INFORMATION (fill DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: 12.85 feet 29.19 feet 10 gallons SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, leachate): out for groundwater samples): MEASUREMENT METHOD: MEASUREMENT METHOD: REMOVAL METHOD: i.e., septage, Water Level Indicator Water Level Indicator Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°Fi: 18°C OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, pH: 6.74 ODOR: Slight Leachate Odor SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): 2,500 etc.): CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorganlcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: 1-1~2" ~,0.10 2" =0.16 2- U2" = 0.24 0.37 4"=0.6.5 6~= 1~16 $14760/3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: MH-2D FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: MW-2D-GW TIME: 6:30 pm WEATHER: Sunny SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher DATE: 7/24/91 TEMPERATURE: 90°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): DEPTH TO HATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: 11.85 feet 86.07 feet 48 gallons i.e., septage, MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°F): 18.1'C OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, pN: 6.56 ODOR: None SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): etc.): 2,450 CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorganlcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: I-I~Z' ~ o.10 =0.16 2~1~. 0~24 3" = 0.37 3-1/2" = 0..~0 4" = 0.6~ 6' ~ I.'16 S 147~1/4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: TIME: 1l:30 am SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher MN-3S MW-3S-GW WEATHER: Overcast, Drizzle DATE: 7/25/91 TEMPERATURE: 80°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, leachate): HELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF HELL: VOLUME REMOVED: 43.05 feet 57.59 feet 10 gallons i.e., septage, MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator MEASUREMENT METHOD: Mater Level Indicator REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°F): 23.3°C pH: 6.41 ODOR: Slight Leachate Odor SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): 2,0(0) OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorgantcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: 1- I/4' ~ 0.0~/ 1-1/~' - 0.10 2" --0.16 2- I/'2" ~ O.2A 4' = 0.6~ 1.46 S 1476(]/$ SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: TIME: 12:00 am SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher MW-3D MW-3D-GW WEATHER: Overcast, Drizzle DATE: 7/25/91 TEMPERATURE: 80°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 43.16 feet 125.00 feet 62 gallons DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: i.e., septage, MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°Fi: 15.5°C pH: 7.54 ODOR: None SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umho$/cm): OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): 5,000 CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorganlcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: 2" =0,16 2-1/2'. 0.24 0.37 4" = 0.6~ 3-1/2'. 0.~0 6"- 1.46 S 14760/6 SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/HELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: TIME: 8:30 am MW-4S MN-4S-GN WEATHER: Sunny SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher DATE: 7126191 TEMPERATURE: gO°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE HATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 58.81 feet 72.31 feet MEASUREMENT METHOD: MEASUREMENT METHOD: 9 gallons REMOVAL METHOD: Water Level Indicator Water Level Indicator Bailer DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMC)VED: FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°F): 13.2°C pH: 4.80 ODOR: None SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): 190 CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorgantcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: I- I/4' = O.OT7 I-1/2'. 0.10 2' =0,16 ~- ~ m 0,.24 =0.37 4" = 0.6~ 3-1/2'- O JO 6',- 1.46 S 1476~/'7 1 I I I I I ! I I 1 I I I I I I I i SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: MW-4D FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: M)~-4D-GN TIME: 8:04) am WEATHER: Sunny SAMPLE CREH: P. Conde, F. Tooher DATE: 7/26/91 TEMPERATURE: 90°F SAMPLE GROUND MATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 58.57 feet 150.0 feet 60 gallons DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: i.e., septage, MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°F): 13.3°C pH: 7.g3 ODOR: None SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorgantcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: I - I/4' = 0.0'/7 I-1/2' - 0.10 2" --0.16 2~ 1/2'* ~ 0.24 0.37 4' = 0.65 3-1/'~ =. O JO 6'~ 1.46 S 14760/B SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I,D, NUMBER: TIME: 4:45 pm SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher MW-5S MW-SS-GN HEATHER: Overcast, Orlzzle DATE: 7/25/91 TEMPERATURE: 80°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE HATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): DEPTH TO WATER: 63.41 feet DEPTH OF WELL: 77.45 feet MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer VOLUME REMOVED: g gallons Indicator Indicator FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°Fl: 11.4°C pH: 4.50 ODOR: None SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): 100 CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorgantcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: I-1/4' = 0.077 I-I/2"- 0.10 =0.16 0..37 3--lY/' = O JO 1.46 14760./9 SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: TIME: 5:00 pm SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher MW-SD MW-SD-GW WEATHER: Overcast, Drizzle DATE: 7/25/91 TEMPERATURE: 80°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 62.81 feet 136.00 feet 47 gallons DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: MEASUREMENT METHOD: MEASUREMENT METHOD: REMOVAL METHOD: Bladder Pump FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear i.e., septage, Water Level Indicator Water Level Indicator pH: 7.10 ODOR: None TEMPERATURE (°Fi: 12.3°C SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorganlcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: ~ I-V4'=O.OT7 2" =0.16 3' =0.37 !- IA"' - O. I0 2-1/2' -, 0.24 S 147(~3/10 m ! I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I i SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southo)d Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: MW-6S FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: MW-6S-GW TIME: 2:05 pm WEATHER: Sunny SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher DATE: 7/24/91 TEMPERATURE: gO°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 47.01 feet 58.51 feet 30 gallons DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: i.e., septage, MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°Fi: pH: 5.78 ODOR: None ll.5°C SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): 900 OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.): CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorganlcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: Sample analyzed for WS/MSD - triple volume collected. Sample split with John Conover of NYSDEC for TCL organics and inorganic parameters. (3AI.~F I-I/4" ~ 0.077 2' --0.16 I-mY~ ~ 0.10 2-1f2~ ~ 0.24 3~lf~' = o Jo 6"= t.46 $147(~3/11 SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: TIME: 3:30 pm SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher MW-6D MW-6D-GW WEATHER: Overcast, Drlzzle DATE: 7/25/91 TEMPERATURE: 80°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage, leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 47.16 feet 145.00 feet 63 gallons DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°Fl: OTHER (OVA, pH: 7.45 ODOR: None 13.6°C SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): Methane meter, etc.): 1,500 CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorgantcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: I-1~4'=0.077 2" =0.16 3' =0.37 4' = 0,6~ $147613/12 I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/WELL NO: MW-7S FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: MW-7S-GW TIME: l:30 pm WEATHER: Sunny SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher DATE: 7/24/91 TEMPERATURE: 90°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND WATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage, leachate): HELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 42.57 feet 57.25 feet 9 gallons DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear TEMPERATURE (°Fi: OTHER (OVA, pH: 5.60 ODOR: None 14.8°C SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): Methane meter, etc.): 95O CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorganlcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: 1-1/4"=0.0T7 2" =0.16 3" ~OJ7 1-1/2'-,0.10 2.-I/2'=0.24 3-1/2' ~ 0.50 4"=0.65 6'~ 1.46 S 147~/13 I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD SITE: Southold Landfill SAMPLE LOCATION/NELL NO: FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER: TIME: 9:00 am MW-7D MW-TD-GH WEATHER: Sunny SAMPLE CREW: P. Conde, F. Tooher DATE: 7/26/91 TEMPERATURE: gO°F SAMPLE TYPE: GROUND HATER: X SURFACE WATER/STREAM: SOIL: SEDIMENT: AIR: OTHER (Describe, i.e., leachate): WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples): 41.48 feet 125.00 feet 55 gallons DEPTH TO WATER: DEPTH OF WELL: VOLUME REMOVED: septage, MEASUREMENT METHOD: Hater Level Indicator MEASUREMENT METHOD: Water Level Indicator REMOVAL METHOD: Bailer FIELD TEST RESULTS: COLOR: Clear to Light Reddish Brown TEMPERATURE (°Fi: 14.6°C OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, pH: 6.32 ODOR: None SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/cm): etc.): 600 CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED: TCL +30 Organics and Inorgantcs Leachate Parameters REMARKS: Iron stalnlng appears to be the cause of the slightly reddish color of saJ~ple and not the sediment. GAL/I*r i-I/4'.0.0T7 2' =0.16 3' =0.]7 4'=0.~ I-I/2'- 0.10 2-1/2'. 0.24 3-1/2'. 0._q0 6'- 1.46 $14760/14 ~nytest ! envlonmenta CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD SHIP TO: Nytest Environmental Inc. 60 Seaview Blvd. Port Washington, NY 11050 (516) 625-5500 Attn. Page Address ~ ~, ,~ Phone ~//5-- Project No. I Project Name_ Date Shipped Sam~i~t~ ~ I Analytical P,o,~ol Air Bill No. Cooler No. Sa~le Date/Time Sample No. Of Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED I.D. Sampled Description tainers Special Instructions/Comments , ! Client P~tains Yellow Copy Only CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD SHIP TO: Nytest Environmental Inc. 60 Seaview Blvd. Port Washington. NY 11050 1516) 625-5500 Attn Pa e I of., Address ~1~ ~,', Phone Attn Project No. Project Name Date Shipped Carrier~ ~ampler; (Signature) ~ ~ ] AnalytiCal ~rot~o~[ Air Bill No. Cooler ~ample Date/Time Sample No. Of Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED I.D. Sampled Description tainers ~ ' '' ~' ' · ' / - I Special Instructions/Comments I Client Retains Yellow Copy Only nytest CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD I SHIP TO: Nytest Environmental Inc. 60 Seaview Blvd. Port Washington, NY 11050 i (516) 625-5500 Page ~ of . REPORT TO: Client Name Address Phone / ~/~ I i I i! I I 1 I I i II i I I-._ %/..C.. L,._ Project No. I Project Name Date Shipped Carrier Sampler: (Signature , J Ana yt cai Prot~ol Air Bill Nn ,; ,~ I .~x~o~c 4r~ ~Ol~oI CoolerNo. Sample Date~ime Sample No. Of I Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED I.D. Sampled Description tainers , Special Instructions/Comments ~'-~/IC_~ ~.'~_ ~,'., b.~. ~"b( 17~,~_ ~. ~ I I ~ ~ +~,.,~.~ - ,_ ,.~... , ¢ -[" .. . . _~ y - ,~ ~./~o ~ ~.,~,,.0~)./c~J,L :,~:~,¢~,~ ~ ~,',~. ~.~,,~ ,.~oR, ~. ~ Client Retain~ Yellow Copy Only / / ' II envlronmenta CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD SHIP TO: Nytest Environmental Inc. 60 Seaview Blvd. Port Washington, NY 11050 Is~s~ s25-ss0o. , Attn. Sample Date/Time ~ample No. Of ~ / - ' f ~ ~ Con- ,, ~A[YSI~ REQUESTED enwronmental ! CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD '- Page SHIP TO: Nytest Environmental Inc. REPORT TO: Client Name 60 Seaview Blvd. Address ~O Port Washington, NY 11050 ~-~ ~¥; q (516) 625-5500 Phone Attn. ,/(/} ~'~- _~ ~' 'q ~ ~1',. Attn Project No. I Project Name Date Shipped Carrier/ ~ampler: (Signature) A~alytical Protocol Air ~.ill No, Cooler No. ~ample Date~ime Sample No. Of Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED hD. Sampled Description tainers Special I nstructions/Comments)k~ ,~ J, ~ [.~0~ ~,~ _, C~-h .~' ~., n~.~_.(: '~...~. ~,~.!i,,,~....,:f~,~L ~ , / ' Client Retain~ Yellow Copy Only CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD SHIP TO; Nytest Environmental Inc. 60 Seaview Bird. Port Washington, NY 11050 Attn(516) 6 ~5.5~..~ Page / of... / REPORTTO: Client Name /'~v:~ )C~ ~/.~-/~.~ ~- [ Address ~ ~o 0 ~ -'Tt'~ ,' ~. ~I -To, ~/ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~.,,~ ~ ~y-' Project No. J Project Nam~ Date ShioRed ~ y~r)~ ~'.- 45p oo3~O(TZZZ Sample' Date/Time Sample No. Of Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED I.D. Sampled Description tainen enwronmental I CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD I I ! t I I II SHIP TO: Nytest Environmental Inc. 60 Seaview Blvd. Port Washington, NY 11050 (516) 625-5,~(~0, Attn. I i I Page / of / Project No. Project Namo, Date Shipped Car,~r t Sample~/;-~~ Analytical Protocol Air Bill No. Cooler No. SamP~ee Date/Time ' Sample Nd. Of Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED I.D. Sampled Oescription tainers Speciallnstructions/Com~ments~' ~/w/2/Z~ qL~ L x'~,~ "F'~,'" ~.~/ "~C~-'~;~4.~.-~cJr..,· [L,/,./~~: Client'Retains Yellow Copy Only eNVlrONmentcl I CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Page.-~..r_o f J. SHIPTO: NytestEnvironmentallnc. Address ~'0~ . r. ~) -'r-_~ ~,-~; ~, 60 Seaview Blvd. Port Washington, NY 11050 Attn ~mpqe Date~ime ' Sample No. Of I - Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED I.D. Sampled Description tainers Special I nstructions/Comment~ '/ { ' ~ Client Retains Yellow Copy Onl environmental SHIP TO: Nytest Environmental Inc. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Page I of I 60 Seaview Blvd. Port Washington. NY 11050 (516) 625-~,~00 ~L~/_,~;~t ~ ~ Attn , - · 3rgject No. I P,coject I~an~eI Date Shipped Carrier ,amp~~ I ~.a,,,,=.,~.Protocol~¢l . Air Bill(~o~/No ~¢~ Cooler~. ~ample Date~ime Sample No. Of Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED LD. Sampled ~ , ~,Z ~e~cription tainers Special Instructions/Comments'~3~'~/~/.', Ay,' '/, ~..~,,3,1.,.~'c,~ G/ Client Retains Yellow Copy Only I ~nytest I envlronmenta ,~ SHIP TO: Nytest Environmental Inc. 60 Seaview Blvd. Port Washington, NY 11050 Attn. / '. r-['_ (~/-~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Pae( of I, Phone Attn ProjectNo. '~z..7.4."~"~ Il ~.-J ~11 DateShippe(j Carrier, Sample'- Date/Time Sample No. Of Con- ANALYSIS REQUESTED I.D. Sampled Description tainers Rel,..u,~~ Dim / T,me R.'d eV(S,~nature' Date I T,me i I I I ! ! I ! ' ' o ~1~,. "I / Client Retains Yellow Copy Only / I I I I I t I ! I i I I i I I ! I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 1 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 1 & 2 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Clear & sunny (PM) Clear & sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) °F WIND SPEED (AM) (PM) °F (PM) SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME P. Ox)nde Fran Tooher 3oe Zollo Phil Zackman Sa1 Lazzerino Greg Brannigan Bob Noud 1027-B03 DATE: 4-23-91 RAINFALL: (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES MPH HIND DIRECTION (AM) MPH (PM) AFFILIATION D&B D&B D&B R&L Dri 11 ing R&L Orilltng R&L Orl 11 tng R&L Dr111 ing SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 6:30 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:15 0530B/1 DATE: 4-23-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN): 6:30 8:00 10:30 12:00 1:00- 1:30 1:30 Leave for site with Joe Zollo, Fran Tooher. Arrived on site, unpacked equipment. Fran and Joe began soil gas work. Drillers arrive on-site, received fit test and medical approvals from drillers. Met with Jim Bunchuck to discuss locations for drilling. Lunch. Arrived back from lunch. Drillers constructed excavation to place decontamination pad. Continued meeting with Jim Bunchuck. 2:30 Phoned Robin to see if bottles have arrived from lab yet. They have. 2:45 ! go out with Jim Bunchuck to show locations of the well. 4:00 ! return to decontamination area. Decontamination pad completed. 4:30 Orillers leave site. Joe and Fran are finishing up. 4:45 All personnel off-site. 6:15 Arrive at office. 0530B/2 ! I I ! I ! I I I i I i ! i I i DATE: 4-23-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the construction of decon pad and general mobilization. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): Inspected constructed decon pad - all water is belng controlled effectively. LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIENED BY: 0530B/3 I ! I I I I i I I I I i [ / [ I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT TEMPERATURE: REPORT NO: 2 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Overcast (AM) 65°F WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) ?O°F (PM) 3 MPH PROJECT NO: 3-9 SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: 1027-B03 RAINFALL: NAME Peter Conde Phil Zackman Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Gertsh Desai Daniel Pappachun DATE: 4-24-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) NW AFFILIATION D&B R&L Dri 11 ing R&L Dri 11 ing R&L Ori 11 tng NYSDEC NYSDEC SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) (AM) 6:15 (PM) (PM) 7:00 0530B/4 DATE: 4-24-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT ~ORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 6:15 7:45 8:00- 8:45 9:15 11:30 12:45 2:15 3:00 5:00 5:30 7:05 P. Conde leaves office. P. Conde on-site calibrating instruments. Drillers prepare equipment for mobe to MH-7S. First sample taken. Drillers hit water at 40 ft. Take lunch break while P. Conde fills OVA with H2. NYSDEC on-site. Drillers begin to sand well. NYSDEC leaves site. Finish grouting well to surface. All personnel off-site. P. Conde arrives at D&B office. 0530B/5 DATE: 4-24-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised drilling and sampling of monitoring well MW-TS. Conducted air monitoring with OVA, TIP and Exotox meter. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/6 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 3 PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 DATE: 4-25-91 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: ll-14 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY WEATHER: (AM) Sunny RAINFALL: (AM) 0 INCHES (PM) Sunny (PM) 0 INCHES TEMPERATURE: (AM) 65°F HIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) 70°F (PM) 0 MPH (PM) -- SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME AFFILIATION P. Conde D&B Bob Noud R&L Drilling Sa1Lazzerino R&L Drilling Phil Zackman R&L Drilling Rich Baran R&L Drilling Gertsh Desat NYSOEC SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) (AM) 8:00 (PM) (PM) 3:30 0530B/7 DATE: 4-25-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 Drillers on-site. Provide documentation stating that well screens and rinses have been decontaminated with a wash, acetone rinse air dried then hermetically sealed. The PVC material is Type 1, Grade 1PVC and satisfies ASTI4 requirements 1784, 02665 and 01785. Orlllers having trouble with the rig hydraulic system - will attempt repair. 3:30 Drillers leave site to repair rig. I go back to office and leave office at 5:30. 0530B/8 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I DATE: 4-25-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Measured distance between well number MW-4 and MW-§ and flagged out location accordingly. Supervised decon and rig repair work. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 05308/9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 4 PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 DATE: 4-26-91 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 15-18 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 60°F (PM) 65°F RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 5 MPH (PM) 5 MPH (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) NN (PM) N SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Peter Conde Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Phil Zackman AFFILIATION D&B R&L Drtlling R&L Drilling R&L Drilling SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 7:30 (AM) (PM) (PM) 4:30 0530B/lO DATE: 4-26-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 6:15 8:00- 8:40 8:55 9:00- 11:50 12:00- 3:30 3:30- 4:00 5:30 P. Conde leaves office for site. Drillers decon equipment. Set up at MN-3S. Orill and sample every five feet to 55 feet. Install we1! screen and riser, sand pack seal and grout well. Oecon. P. Conde arrive at office. No lunch today. 0530B/11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 4-26-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drillin9 of MW-3S. Performed air monitorin§ at this location and collected and logged geolo§ic samples. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIENED BY: 0530B/12 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NO: 21-24 REPORT NO: 5 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY WEATHER: (AM) Overcast (PM) Hazy, overcast TEMPERATURE: (AM) 55°F (PM) 60°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: 1027-B03 RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0 MPH NAME Peter Conde Fran Tooher Sa1Lazzerino Phil Zackman Bob Noud DATE: 4-29-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- AFFILIATION D&B D&B R&L Ort 11 lng R&L Ort 11 tng R&L Dri 1ling SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 10:45 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:00 0530B/13 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 4-29-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN): 6:15 8:00 10:45 11:30 12:00- 2:00 2:30 3:15 3:15- 5:00 0530B/14 P. Conde leaves office for site. On-site awaiting drillers. Drillers on-site. Begin deconning. Mobing to MW-2. Dig down a few feet to see if there is garbage present. There is so we relocate hole to bottom of hill. Drill down to 27 feet. Fran Tooher on-site, delivers hydrogen and well development instrumentation. Drillers have installed well screen, riser, sand pack, seals, and grout in MW-2S. Mobe back to decon pad, decon and leave site. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 4-29-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilling and installation of MH-2S. Conducted air monitoring and collected soil samples for geologic characterization. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/15 m m DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NO: 25-31 REPORT NO: 6 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY HEATHER: (AM) Heavy rain (PM) Rain TEMPERATURE: (AM) 65°F (PM) 68°F 1027-B03 RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0 MPH SITE CONDITION: Very Poor PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Peter Conde Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Mark Roberts DATE: 4-30-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- AFFILIATION D&B R&L Drilling R&L Drilltng R&L Drilling SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:50 0530B/16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 4-30-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 8:00- 9:00 9:00- I1:25 12:00 12:00- 1:44 2:00- 3:00 3:00- 5:30 5:30- 6:50 Drillers on-site deconning. Attempt to move rig to location MH-4S. Due to wet condition , rig could not maneuver around at this location. Some standby associated with awaiting landfill personnel to open fence. Drillers begin building I~i-2S. Developing MH-2S. Developing MW--3S. Developing NH-7S. Setting protective casing. Setting protective casing. Decon and leave site. 0530B/17 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 4-30-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the development of wells MW-2S, MW-3S and MW-7S. Monitored pH, conductivity, temperature and turbidity during well development activities. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/18 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 7 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 33-40 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 (AM) Overcast and fog (PM) Hazy sunshine TEMPERATURE: (AM) 58°F (PM) 65°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 3-5 MPH NAME P. Conde Bob Noud Sa1Lazzerino DATE: 5-1-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L Drilling R&L Drilling SUBCONTRACTOR NORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 7:30 (AM) (PM) (PM) 7:00 0530B/19 DATE: 5-1-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 7:30 I arrive on-site. 8:00 Drillers arrive on-site. 8:15 Driller mobe to MW-1S. I go back to discuss situation with Tim Bunchuck. 9:15- 3:29 3:30- 5:15 5:15- 6:00 Drilled down to 55 feet. Installed well screen, riser sand pack, seals and grout. Deconned equipment and left site. 0530B/20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-1-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilling and installation of monitoring well MW-IS. Performed air monitoring and collected geologic samples continuously. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I '1 m DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT 8 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 41-43 PROJECT: Southold Landfill REPORT NO: ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 65°F (PM) 70°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0 MPH NAME Peter Conde Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino DATE: 5-2-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- AFFILIATION D&B R&L Drilling R&L Drilling SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0530B/22 I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-2-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN)'. 8:00 10:00 10:15 10:40 11:25 12:00- 12:20 I arrived at site and calibrated equipment. Drillers arrive at site, decontaminate equipment. Drillers go to MW-1S to develop well and tnstall protective casing. Having difficulty starting pump. Pump starts. Begin developing. Drillers remove pump from hole for decontamination. Mix cement for flush mount protective casing at MW-1S. Showed drtllers locations for MW-4 and MW-5. Feastble to mobilize to these areas today. 2:30 Rig et up at MW-SS. 3:00 Start drilling at MW-SS. 4:30 Drilled to 55 feet. Return to decontamination pad where landfill people assist in moving the five development drums from MW-1S, also assist in moving grouts onto trucK. 5:30 All personnel off-site. I I I I I ! ! I I 0530B/23 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I DATE: 5-2-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the development of MN-1S. Performed measurements of pH, conductivity, temperature and turbidity. Also supervised the drilling of MN-SS to a depth of 55 feet. Attempted to find locatlon of county wells on-site. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): Before drilling at MN-5S, measured the height of the hill by using a Brunton Compass and a 100 ft. tape. The angle vas measured to calculate the height of MN-SS above the floor of the excavation to tnitlate sampllng at the same level as the floor of the excavation. VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/24 1 I il I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 9 PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 45-49 DATE: 5-3-91 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Cloudy (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 50°F (PM) 68°F SITE CONDITION: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 10-15 MPH (PM) lO MPH (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) NE PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME AFFILIATION P Conde F. Tooher B. Stalters Bob Noud Sal Lazzerlno D&B D&B D&B R&L Drilling R&L Drilling SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 4:30 0530B/25 I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I i I I DATE: 5-3-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN): 8:00 8:00- 9:10 9:10- 10:45 9:30 10:50- 2:30 2:00- 4:00 P. Conde arrived on-site. Drillers on-site Drill and sample at five foot intervals from 55 to 76 feet. Fran Tooher and Brian Stalters on-site to do survey. Install well screen, riser, sand pack, seals and grout. Develop MW-SS. 0530B/26 DATE: 5-3-9l DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilllng, sampling and installation of MW-SS. Also supervised the development of MW-SS. Performed air monitoring and measured pH, conductivity, temperature and turbidity. Also surveyed the locations and elevations of MW-1S, MW-2S, MW-3S, MW-5S and MW-7S. Collected depth to water data. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 05308/27 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 10 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 51-52 PROJECT: ADDRESS: HEATHER: TEMPERATURE: (AM) 56°F (PM) 60°F 1027-803 Southold Landft11 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) OrJzzle RAINFALL: (PM) Heavy rain HIND SPEED (AM) 15-20 MPH (PM) 25-30 MPH SITE CONDITION: Very poor PERSONNEL ON SITE: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: NAME P. Conde B. Noud S. Lazzerino (AM) 7:30 (AM) DATE: 5-6-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) N AFFILIATION O&B R&L Dri 11 ing R&L Dr111 ing (PM) (PM) 1:00 05308/28 I I I I I I I I i I I I I il' DATE: 5-6-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN): 7:30 8:30- 12:00 12:00- 1:00 P. Conde on-site. Drillers begin deconning and obtaining water. Drill MW-4S to a depth of 45 feet. Decon and leave site due to heavy driving rain. 0530B/2g I I I I ! I I I I I I I i i I I I DATE: 5-6-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the augering of MH-4S to a depth of 45 feet. This depth was determined using a bruntlng compass and a tape measure to determine the height of this location above the floor of the pit. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/30 I I I 1 I I ! I I ! I I I I i t I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NO: 53-57 REPORT NO: ll FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY WEATHER: (AM) Partly cloudy (PM) TEMPERATURE: (AM) 55°F (PM) 70°F SITE CONDITION: Fair PERSONNEL ON SITE: 1027-B03 RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) l0 MPH (PM) l0 MPH NAME Peter Conde Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Greg Brannigan G. Desai D. Pappachun DATE: 5-7-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) S (PM) E AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L R&L NYSDEC NYSDEC SUBCONTRACTOR NORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR NORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0530B/31 DATE: 5-7-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT ~ORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 8:30- 10:30 10:30- 1:00 12:00 12:45 1:00- 3:00 Drillers on-site. Drill and sample every 5 feet from 45 feet to 73 feet. Set well screen, riser, sand pack, seal and grout well. NYSDEC on-site. NYSDEC leaves site. Develop MW-4S. Set protective casing over well MW-5S. 0530B/32 DATE: 5-7-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilling, sampling and well installation of monitoring well MW-4S. ALso supervise the development of MW-4S. Performed air monitoring and took measurements of pN, conductivity, turbidity and temperature (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 05308/33 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 12 PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 59-65 DATE: 5-8-91 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Partly sunny RAINFALL: (PM) Partly sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 68°F HIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 73°F (PM) 0 MPH SITE CONDITION: Good (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME AFFILIATION Peter Conde Bob Noud Sa1 Lazzer~no Greg Brannlgan G. Oesai D&B R&L R&L R&L NYSDEC SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) (AM) 8:00 (PM) (PM) 6:00 05308/34 DATE: 5-8-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 8:15 8:45 9:40 10:20- 1:35 3:00 3:00- 4:10 5:00- 6:00 Drillers on-site. Awaiting access to location MW-6S. Calibrated equipment. Drillers decide to set protective casing over MW-4S. Setting up at MW-6S. Drill down to 29 feet continuously samp]ed. Encounter excessively high LEL (<100~) within borehole. Decide to grout hole after hole shows no sign of venting. Grouting borehole, pulling augers. Decon and leave site. 05308/35 I I I ! I I I I I i I I I I I i I I DATE: 5-8-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised drilling and sampling of abandoned borehole MW-6SA. Performed air monitoring (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): Drillers claim that from the time they got to the site and actually started drilling should be standby. I resolved by stating that from the time they arrive to the time they begin work on the protective casing is the only ~usttftable standby. PREPARED BY: Peter Ox)nde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/36 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! II ! ! II ! ! ! ! ! ! DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: $outhold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 68°F (PM) 73°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: 13 PROJECT NO: 67-70 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0 MPH NAME Peter Conde Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Greg Brannigan DATE: 5-9-92 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 2:30 0530B/37 m ! I I ! ! i i I I I I DATE: 5-9-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 8:15- 8:55 8:55- 9:30 9:30- 12:40 12:40- 2:45 1:45- 2:30 Drillers on-site. P. Conde arrive on-site. Calibrate equipment. Drill MW-6SA to a depth of 15 feet and collect two samples - one at 5 feet and one at ten feet. Hit excessively high LEL's of 1001~. Need to grout borehole. Grout hole, pull augers. Standby while landfill people clear access to MW-6SC located adjacent to the existing town wells. Drill down to 25 feet and encounter excessively high LELs. Will allow hole to vent overnight. Oecon equipment, leave site. 0530B/38 :! I I I ! I I ! I I I ! I I ! I I i I DATE: 5-9-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilling and sampling of boreholes MW-6SB and MW-6SC. Perform air monitoring (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 05300/39 m DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 14 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfl]! ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Overcast (PM) TEMPERATURE: PROJECT NO: 71 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) 65°F (PM) °F SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: BO3 RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 0-3 MPH (PM) MPH NAME P. Conde DATE: 5-10-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) AFFILIATION D&B SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 7:OO (AM) (PM) (PM) 05308/40 m m I I DATE: 5-10-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 7:00 I arrive on-site. Went directly to MW-6 and took LEL and OVA reading. 7:15 LEL I glO, OVA = >1000 ppm. Called drillers and notified that there would be no work performed because of the excess methane levels. 0530B/41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-10-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Took a reading of the augers in MN-6SC. LELs were still over ]00~. I cai]ed drillers to te]] then not to come to site so as to allow augers to vent over the weekend. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/42 I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT PRO2ECT NO: 73 REPORT NO: 15 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 70°F (PM) 75°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: 1027-B03 RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 3 MPH (PM) 3 MPH NAME Peter Conde Bob Noud Norbert Hartmann DATE: 5-13-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) N AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 6:15 (AM) CPM) (PM) 5:3O 0530B/43 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-13-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 6:15 11:05 11:25 12:45 1:00- 5:20 P. Conde leaves office for site. Drillers arrive on-site. Begin to spin augers at MH-6SC immediately causing LEL readings to go up to <100~. Drillers finish abandoning MN-6SC. Drillers decon equipment and prepare for drilling tomorrow, then leave site. 0530B/44 I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-13-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the mobilization of the cable tool rig. Also supervised the abandonment of boring MW-6C due to high LEL readings LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/45 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 35 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 1 from 2nd book County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY TEMPERATURE: (AM) 70°F (PM) 78°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) (PM) NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino DATE: 6-14-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES MPH NIND DIRECTION (AM) MPH (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:OO (AM) (PM) (PM) 3:00 0531B/1 DATE: 6-14-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 7:30 8:00 8:30 11:00 11:30 12:15 12:35 12:45 12:55 3:00 5:00 I arrived at site. Drillers arrived at site, loaded up truck. Continued bumping casing. Sal went to fill truck with water. Sa) returned. Bob stopped drilling because of problems pulling casing - needs a heavier hammer. Went to phone Lou to discuss problems. Bob returned. Lou was not available. Began drilling again. Bob stopped drilling. Still can't remove casing. Still can't contact Lou. Clean up for weekend. Left site. Arrived home. 0531B/2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-14-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Tried to bump casing fromM W-lO (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEMED BY: 0531B/3 I I I I I I I '1 I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 36 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) (PM) PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 3 from 2nd book County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY RAINFALL: TEMPERATURE: (AM) °F WIND SPEED (AM) MPH (PM) °F (PM) MPH SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Pete Conde Bob Noud Sa1 Lazzertno SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: (AM) 8:00 SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 05318/4 DATE: 6-17-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L (PM) (PM) 7:00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-17-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 6:15 7:45 8:00 11:00 1:30 7:00 05318/5 P. Conde leaves for site. P. Conde on-site. Drillers arrive on-site. Proceed to bump casing out of MN-ID. Having extreme difficulty removing casing - Bob Noud goes to shop to get hydraulic jacks. Bob Noud back on-site installing jacks pulled 30 ft. All personnel off-site. DATE: 6-17-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Bump 30 ft. of casing from MW-10 (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Pete Conde REVIEWED BY: 05318/6 I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 37 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: $outhold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Overcast (PM) Overcast PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 4 & 5 of 2nd book County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY TEMPERATURE: (AM) 73°F (PM) 75°F SITE CONDITION: C~od PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0-5 MPH (PM) 0-5 MPH NAME Pete Conde Sa1 Lazzertno Bob Noud DATE: 6-18-91 CAM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:30 0531B/7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-18-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 ]1:30 6:30 All personnel on-site. Proceeded to MH-1D to continue pulling casing. Hole fully grouted - remaining casing pulled from hole. Driller will develope MW-1D. All drums removed from MI~-ID. All personnel off-site. 0531B/8 DATE: 6-18-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Bumped remaining casing from MW-1D. Developed MW-1D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEHED BY: OS31B/9 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 38 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PRO3ECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Drizzle - lgt. rain (PM) PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 6 of 2nd book County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY TEMPERATURE: (AM) 65°F (PM) °F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) calm MPH (PM) MPH NAME Peter Conde Fran Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzertno Norbert Hartman Greg Brannigan DATE: 6-19-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) AFFILIATION D&B D&B R&L R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0531B/10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I i I DATE: 6-19-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 10:30 6:00 F. Tooher leaves for site. 8:00 All personnel on-site. Drillers decon rig and equipment. Sa1 sets flush mount casing at MN-1D. Norbert Hartman and Greb Brannigan arrive on-site with second rig. Rig #1 will mobiltze to MN-7D and rig #2 will mobilize to 1414-20. ]:00 Both rlgs are set up at locations. 5:00 Both rigs are down 30 ft. 5:30 All personnel off-site. 0531B/11 DATE: 6-19-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL ~ORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Completed flush mount on MH-1D. Mobilized rigs to MW-7D and MH-2D. Drilled 30 feet on both (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Fran Tooher REVIEWED BY: 0531B/12 I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 3g PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 DATE: 6-20-91 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 7 & 8 from 2nd book PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: (AM) Cloudy (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) ?O°F (PM) 8?°F SITE CONDITION: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 0-3 MPH (PM) calm MPH (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Pete Conde Fran Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Norbert Hartman Greg Brannigan AFFILIATION D&B D&B R&L R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 4:45 O531B/13 I 1 I i ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-20-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 8:00- 8:15 3:00 4:45 A11 personnel on-site. Calibrated 1nstruments. Began drilling at MN-2D and 7D. Completed drilllng for day and began cleanup. All personnel off-site. 0531B/14 I I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-20-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL ~ORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Drilled at MW-2D and MH-7D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Fran Tooher REVIEWED BY: 0531B/15 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 40 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 10 & 11 of 2nd book County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY TEMPERATURE: (AM) 78°F (PM) °F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 0-5 MPH (PM) MPH NAME Pete Conde Fran Tooher Bob Noud Norbert Hartman Greg Brannigan DATE: 6-21-gl (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) AFFILIATION D&B D&B R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) (AM) (PM) (PM) 4:00 05318/16 I I I I I i I I I i I i I I I I I I I DATE: 6-21-9'1 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 8:00 All personnel on-site and begin set up on both rigs. 3:00 Complete drilling and pulling casing for the day. Start cleanup. 4:00 All personnel left site. 5:30 Fran Tooher and Pete Conde attire at site. 0531B/17 I I ! I I i I I I I ! I I / 1 I I I DATE: 6-21-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Drilled and began pulling casing on MH-2D and 70 (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Fran Tooher REVIENED BY: 0531B/18 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 41 PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 14 of 2nd book DATE: 6-24-91 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY WEATHER: (AM) (PM) RAINFALL: TEMPERATURE: (AM) °F WIND SPEED (AM) MPH (PM) °F (PM) MPH SITE CONDITION: Good (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME AFFILIATION Pete Conde Fran Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Greg Brannigan Norbert Nartman D&B D&B R&L R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) (AM) 7:55 (PM) (PM) 5:00 0531B/lg I I I I I I I I i DATE: 6-24-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT ~ORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 6:15 Pete Conde and Fran Tooher leave for site. 7:45 Pete Conde and Fran Tooher arrive at site. 7:55 Drillers arrive at site. Drillers proceed to pull casing from MH-2D and MW-7D after installing well at 85 ft. for MW-2D and 125 ft. at 14W-70. 5:00 All personnel left site. 0531B/20 II I I I I :1 I il I I I I I i I I I I DATE: 6-24-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Pulled casing from V~-2D, MH-7O (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Fran Tooher REVIEHED BY: 0531B/21 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 42 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfi)l ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) (PM) PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 16 of 2nd book County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY RAINFALL: TEMPERATURE: (AM) °F WIND SPEED (AM) MPH (PM) °F (PM) MPH SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Pete Conde Fran Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Norbert Hartman Greg Brannigan DATE: 6-25-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) AFFILIATION D&B D&B R&L R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) (AM) 8:00 (PM) (PM) 5:OO 0531B/22 I ! I ! ! I I I ! I I i I i I ! ! DATE: 6-25-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN): 9:30 10:30 11:00 8:00 All personnel on-site. Drillers continue bumptng casing from HH-2D and MH-7D. All casing pulled from H~f-2D. Begin demobilizing rig from site. Rig #2 leaves site. Rig #1 st111 removing casing from HH-TD. Completing paperwork. Contacted State and R&L. 5:00 All personnel off-site. 0531B/23 m I I I ! t m DATE: 6-25-9l DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Bumped casing from MW-2D &MW-7D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Fran Tooher REVIEMED BY: m 0531B/24 ~m I I I I I I 1 i I I '1 m DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 43 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) (PM) PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 18 of 2nd book County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY RAINFALL: TEMPERATURE: (AM) °F WIND SPEED (AM) MPH (PM) °F (PM) MPH SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Pete Conde Fran Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino DATE: 6-26-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) AFFILIATION D&B D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR NORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0531B/25 DATE: 6-26-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 9:30 9:45 10:10 11:25 2:00 4:30 5:30 6:00 All personnel at site. Drillers bumped remaining casing from MW-7D. Calibrated developing MH-7D. Began developing MIC-7D Completed development at MH-TD. Pete phoned State and office. Drillers cleaned equipment. Began developed MH-2D. Completed developing MH-2D. Cleaned up slte demobilizing site. Fran Tooher left site. Pete left site. Fran Tooher arrived home. 0531B/26 DATE: 6-26-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Bumped casing from MW-7D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Fran Tooher REVIEWED BY: 0531B/27 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 44 PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 20 of 2nd book DATE: 6-27-9l PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 80°F (PM) 86°F SITE CONDITION: Good RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 3 MPH (PM) 0 MPH (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) -- PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME AFFILIATION Pete Conde Greg Brannigan Bob Noud Norbert Hartman D&B R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 4:30 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 4§ PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 22-24 Vol. 2 DATE: 7/9/91 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 74°F (PM) 90°F SITE CONDITION: Good RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 3 MPH (AM) -- INCHES (PM) -- INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) SM PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME AFFILIATION SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: P. Conde B. Noud M. Roberts T. Zackman B. Stewart (AM) 6:00 (AM) -- D&B R&L Drt111ng R&L Ortlllng R&L Drtlltng NYSDEC (PM) -- (PM) 5:00 S 1495~/I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 7/9/91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 6:00 am 7:30 am 10:15 am 11:20 am 12:40 pm 5:00 pm Leave office for site. P. Conde on-slte caltbratlng Instruments. B. Stewart on-site. Drillers on-site, begin to decontaminate and mob to MH-6. Start HH-6D. Finish for day at 20 feet. $149~t/2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL ~ORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised decontamination and mobillzatton of mud rig to MH-6D. Performed geologic logging and air monitoring. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 46 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 26-28, Vol. 2 48 County Road, Cutchogue, NY TEMPERATURE: (AM) 78°F (PM) 92°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 0-3 MPN (PM) 0-3 MPH NAME P. Conde B. Noud M. Roberts T. Zackman T. Conover (AM) 7:30 (AM) -- DATE: 7/10/91 (AM) -- INCHES (PM) -- INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) N AFFILIATION D&B R&L Orllltng R&L Drt111ng R&L Ortlltng NYSDEC (PM) -- (PM) 6:30 $1495014 I I I DATE: DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 7:30 am 9:00 am 9:15 am 9:20 am - 6:30 pm P. ¢onde on-stte, cai!bra!lng }nstrument. Drillers on-stte. J. Conover on-slte. Orr11 MN-60 to a depth of 57 feet - sample to 59 feet. $14950/~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 7/10/9] DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Performed atr monttorlng and geologlc loggtng at well bortng MN-6D. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: $1495(}/6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 47 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 30-32, Vol. 2 48 County Road, Cutchogue, Iff TEMPERATURE: (AM) 78°F (PM) 90°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0 MPH NAME P. Conde B. Noud M. Roberts T. Zackman (AM) 8:00 (AM) -- DATE: 7/11/91 (AM) -- INCHES (PM) -- INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- AFFILIATION ~B' R&L Drilling R&L Drilling R&L Drilling (PM) -- (PM) 6:30 $149543/7 DATE: 7/11/91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 am 8:30 am 6:30 pm P. Conde on-site, callbrattng instruments. Drillers start drilling from 57 feet. Drillers stop drilling for day at 140 feet - sampled to 142 feet. 51495G/8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 7/11/91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY DEB CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Performed air monitoring and geologic logging at well boring MW-SD. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 14950/9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 48 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 34, Vol. 2 DATE: 7/12/91 ADDRESS: WEATHER: 48 County Road, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 79°F (PM) 94°F SITE CONDITION: Gc~xt RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0 MPH <AM) -- INCHES (PM) -- INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME AFFILIATION SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: P. Conde B. Noud M. Roberts T. Zackman B. Stewart (AM) B:O0 (AM) -- O&B R&L Drl 111ng R&L Drilling R&L Ortlltng NYSDEC (PM) -- (PM) 6:30 $149.50/10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 7/12/91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 am P. Conde on-site, calibrating instruments. 10:00 am Drillers set screen and riser tn borehole sand pack and grout well and flush well to remove mud. 12:30 - 4:30 pm Drillers decon, rig and set up at MN-6S. P. Conde leaves site. 6:30 pm P. Conde arrives in office. S 14950/11 DATE: 7/12/91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the installation of monitoring well MN-6D. Performed air monitoring. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIENED BY: $149~/12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 49 PROJECT NO: ]027-B03 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 36-38, Vol. 2 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: 48 County Road, Cutchogue, NY HEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny RAINFALL: TEMPERATURE: (AM) 75°F WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPN (PM) gl°F (PM) 0 MPH SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME P. Conde F. Tooher B. Stalters B. Noud N. Roberts T. Zackman B. Stewart SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 6:!5 (AM) -- DATE: 7/15/91 (AM) -- INCHES (PM) -- INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- AFFILIATION O&B D&B D&B R&L Drilling R&L Drt11Ing R&L Drilling NYSDEC (PM) -- (PM) 6:20 $1495O/13 I DATE: 7115191 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 6:15 am 8:00 am 8:30 am 9:00 am 1:55 pm 6:20 pm P. Conde leaves offlce for slte. P. Conde on-slte. Drillers on-site. Begin drtlllng MH-6S, collect sample from 11-13 feet for TCL+30 analysls. F. Tooher and B. Stalters on-slte, begin survey of wells. Begtn to set screen from 56 to 41 feet. Drtllers ftnlsh MH-6S, begtn developing MN-60. $1495(3/14 DATE: 7115191 DAILY FIELD ACTIVII~F REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised drilling and sampling at MN-6S as well as well installation. Performed air monitoring and surveyed all wells for elevation. Supervised development of MW-6D. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 514950115 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 50 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 40-41, Vol. 2 48 County Road, Cutchogue, NY TEMPERATURE: (AM) 80°F (PM) g4°F SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0 MPH NAME P. Conde B. Noud M. Roberts T. Zackman (AM) 8:00 (AM) -- DATE: 7/16/91 (AM) -- INCHES (PM) -- INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- AFFILIATION D&B R&L Drilling R&L Drilling R&L Drilling (PM) -- (PM) 5:15 S 149.,~/16 il I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I i I DATE: 7116191 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 am P. Conde and driller on-site. 8:30 am Develop MW-6S. 12:30 - 3:45 pm Drillers move drums and demob from site. Remove decon. pad. 5:15 pm P. Conde at office. S 1495G/17 DATE: 7/16/91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised deYelopment of MW-6S and demob, of drillers from stte.. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: $1495~/18 I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I ! DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 16 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 75 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-803 (AM) Sunny (PM) Overcast, drizzle TEMPERATURE: (AM) ?5°F (PM) 76°F SITE CONDITION: Fair PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0-3 MPH NAME P. Conde Bob Noud Norbert Hartmann DATE: 5-14-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) N AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 7:00 0530B/46 I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I DATE: 5-14-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 10:45 12:00 5:00 7:00 8:00 P. Conde arrives on-site, calibrate equipment. Drillers arrive on-site and mobilize auger rig off-site and begin deconning. I collect samples for full TCL organics and inorgantcs from rig water. Drillers complete deconning and begin mobilizing rig at MW-SD. Began drilling at MW-SD. Drillers complete drilling to 60 feet. Leave site. Finish Chain of Custody and packing of water sample. 0530B/47 1 I I I i i I t I I I I DATE: 5-14-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilling of monitoring well MW-5D to depth of 75 feet. Collected one water sample from hollow stem auger rig used to drill all of the new shallow monitoring wells (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 05308/48 I I I ! I II I I ! I I I ! I 1 ! I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 17 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROOECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny PROJECT NO: 77-79 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 RAINFALL: TEMPERATURE: (AM) 70°F HIND SPEED (AM) 5 MPH (PM) 75°F (PM) l0 MPH SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Peer Conde B. Noud N Hartmann DATE: 5-15-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) SH (PM) -- AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 7:30 (AM) CPM) (PM) 6:30 0530B/49 I I ! I I I I i l I I i I I I l I I BATE: 5-]5-9] DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN): 7:30 8:00- 8:30 8:30-- 9:30 9:30- 6:30 P. Conde on-site packing up samples and calibrating equipment. Drillers arrive on-site and procure water. Decon and setup. Drill and sample MW-SD from 75 feet down to 122 feet at five foot intervals then leave site. 0530B/50 I I i I I ! ! I I I I ! I I I I ! DATE: 5-15-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilling and sampling of monitoring well MN-5D to a depth of 122'. Also performed air monitoring of samples and ambient air (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/51 I I ! I I ! I ! I I I i I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NO: 81-83 REPORT NO: 18 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 72°F (PM) 76°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: 1027-B03 RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) l0 MPH NAME P. Conde B. Noud N. Hartmann S. Lazzerino DATE: 5-16-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) N AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0530B/52 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-16-9l DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOMN): 8:00 8:05- 9:40 9:40- 2:00 2:00- 3:00 5:30 Pete Conde and drillers on-site. Drillers load equipment get water and decon risers and screen. Drill and sample borehole to a depth of 136 feet. Install 10 foot of screen and 130 for of PVC riser tn borehole and sand pack to two foot above top of screen. Install 1/2 foot of fine sand then bump casing back 10 feet. Drillers leave site. 05308/53 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-16-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilling, sampling and installation of monitoring well MW-SD. Performed ambient as well as specific air monitoring (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/54 I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 19 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 85 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 75°F (PM) 78°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 5-10 MPH (PM) 5 MPH NAME P. Conde B Noud S. Lazzerino DATE: 5-17-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) SE (PM) N AFFILIATION O&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0530B/55 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m m DATE: 5-17-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00- 8:30 8:30- 2:20 2:20-. 3:30 3:30- 5:00 5:00- 5:30 P. Conde and drillers arrive on-site. Begin setting up. Pulling casing out of borehole when coupling snaps. Repair coupling. Pulled a total of 41 feet of casing for day and grouted when coupling breaks again. Cleanup, leave site. 0530B/56 I I I DATE: 5-17-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Continued supervising the removal of casing and grouting of f~-5O (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): Coupllng breaks at thread twtce while bumptng casing causing delays. Htll get hydraulic Jacks out to the site on Monday, 5-20-91. PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEHED BY: 0530B/57 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 72°F (PM) ?6°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: 20 PROJECT NO: 87 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0 MPH (PM) 0 MPH NAME P. Conde S. Lazzerino Bob Noud DATE: 5-20-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) -- (PM) -- AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 6:15 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:30 0530B/58 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-20-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN): 6:15 8:00 12:00 6:30 P. Conde left for site. P. Conde on-site awaiting for drillers. Drillers arrive on-site with jack to jack casing, pull l0 feet casing and quit for day. All personnel off-site. 0530B/Sg I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-20-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the removal and grouting of casing from MW-SD (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): Using the hydraulic Jacks and the hammer seems to work well. PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/60 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 2l PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 89 PROJECT: ADDRESS: HEATHER: Southold Landfill County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 73°F (PM) 80°F SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 5-10 MPH (PM) 5-10 MPH NAME P. Conde B. Noud S. Lazzerino DATE: 5-21-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) NE (PM) NE AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:00 0530B/61 ! ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-21-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 8:00 10:00 10:00- 4:30 4:30- 6:00 P. Conde on-site. Drillers on-site, ianediately begin to pull casing. Pull remaining 75 feet of casing from borehole and grout. Cleanup area. All personnel off-site. 0530B/62 m m I I I ,I m m I i i I I DATE: 5-21-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the removal of casing from monitoring well MW-SD (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 0530B/63 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 22 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: gl PROJECT: Southold Landft)l ADDRESS: ~EATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 (AM) Sunny (PM) Hazy TEMPERATURE: (AM) 75°F (PM) 80°F SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 5-10 MPH (PM) 5-10 MPH NAME P. Conde B. Noud S. Lazzerino DATE: 5-22-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION CAM) N (PM) N AFFILIATION O&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:30 0530B/64 DATE: 5-22-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 8:00 8:05-0 11:30 11:35 11:30- 6:30 6:30 P. Conde on-site. Drillers on-s~te. Oeconned and mobilizing to MW-4D. Start drilling to MW-4D. Advance casing down to 52 feet. All personnel off-site. 0530B/65 I I i I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-22-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Supervised the drilling of monitoring well MI~-4D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEWED BY: 05308/66 I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 23 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 99-101 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 75°F (PM) 87°F SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 0-2 MPH (PM) 2-4 MPH NAME Fran Tooher Pete Conde Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino DATE: $-29-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) S (PM) S AFFILIATION D&B D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 05308/67 ! !m ! m I I I I I i I I I DATE: 5-29-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 8:45 10:15 10:30 3:00 3:3O 5:30 6:30- 8:30 F. Tooher and P. Conde on-site. Drillers on-site proceed to MW-4D begin welding slide hammer. Begin bumping casing. Cable breaks on rig, drillers fix cable. Continued bumping casing. Hammer snapped from casing. Casing up at approximately 10". Drillers soldered off bottom of casing. Continued bumping casing. Left site. Reviewed work plan, did paperwork. 0530B/68 I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 I I I I I DATE: 5-29-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Bumped casing and grouted MH4D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Peter Conde REVIEHED BY: 0530B/69 I I ! I I I i I I I I I i I ! I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT 24 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 103 REPORT NO: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: MEATHER: (AM) Calm, Sunny (PM) TEMPERATURE: (AM) ?7°F (PM) °F SITE CONDITION: Dry PERSONNEL ON SITE: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) MPH (PM) MPH NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Gerish Desai DATE: 5-30-gl (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L NYSDEC SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0530B/70 I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 5-30-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 8:00 9:10 9:15 9:45 10:45 11:00 11:45 12:00 12:10 12:30 2:30 5:30 6:30- 8:30 Arrived at site. Drillers arrived at site. Sa1 went to get water for the rig. Sal returned from getting water. Drillers loaded up truck to continue bumping up casing at MW-4D. I tried to call Pete Conde at office but he was not available. Drillers began bumping casing at MW-4D. Removed 20" of casing and grouted. Phoned Pete. Removed another 20" of casing and grouted. State arrived (Gerish Desai). Removed another 20" of casing and grouted. Gerish Oesat discusses concern about well drilling at 30 (feels there may be a methane LEL problem). State leaves the site. Phoned Pete to discuss Oesai's concern about drilling (cable, welding) at ME-30. Pete feels there will be no problem with cable tool drtlltng at 14W-30 based on LEL reading. Pete wtll call State and discuss the situation. Orillers complete grouting and begin cleanup at 1414-40. Left MN-4D. Returned to trailer to unload equipment and begin decon of equipment. Town brought down grouts. All personnel left site. Did paperwork at hotel. 0530B/71 iI i I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I DATE: 5-30-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Removed casing from MW-4D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEHED BY: 0530B/72 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 25 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 107 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Sunny, calm (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 72°F (PM) 88°F 1027-B03 SITE CONDITION: Dry PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) (PM) NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Norbert Hartmann DATE: 5-31-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES MPH HIND DIRECTION (AM) MPH (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:00 0530B/73 DATE: 5-31-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 8:00 8:30 8:40 9:15 9:42 10:40 11:30 11:45 1:00 1:30 2:30 3:00 4:30 5:00 7:00 Arrive at site. Drillers arrive at site. Cleaned out truck. Drillers concerned about methane problem at MW-3D. Bob called Lou and Phil at R&L and asked me to discuss drilling at MN-3D with them. Because of no LEL problem all agreed drilling would not be a problem. Drillers began set up for developing of MN-5. I went to buy distilled water. Calibrated equipment, set up well. Started developing MW-5D. Completed developing MW-SD. Returned to trailer to steam clean equi pmont. Completed steam cleaning and decon. Started to load truck for developing Mw-go. Bob left site to feet a coupling for PVC attachment at MN-4D. Began developing 14W-40. Completed development of MW-4O. Cleaned up at MW-4O. Began to set up rig at MN-3. Sal put risers and protective casing on HW-4 & 5. Had to have Town get a loader and remove wood and fence that were in the way of the rig at 14W-30. Completed set up of rig at MN-3D. Checked area at 50. Pallets and pipe need to be removed, otherwise site looked good. Completed installing protective casing and risers at MN-SB and NW-4D. Left site. Returned home. 05300/74 DATE: 5-31-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Developed MW-4 and MW-5. Set up for drilling at MW-5. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEWED BY: 0530B/75 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 26 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: ll3 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: HEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Calm, sunny (PM) Calm, sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 70°F (PM) 85°F 1027-B03 SITE CONDITION: Dry PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) (PM) NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sa1Lazzerino DATE: 6-3-gl (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES MPH HIND DIRECTION (AM) MPH (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR NORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 11:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:30 0530B/76 DATE: 6-3-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 9:00 11:00 11:30 6:00 Hent to office and copied field notebook for Pete and left some paperwork. Arrived at site. Callbrated equipment. Packed up truck. Drillers arrived at site. Began set up at MH-3D. Checked stte with OVA, L£L & TIP. Began drilling OVA on 10 scale, 0 LEL, 0 TIP. Phoned Pete to discuss OVA reading. Pete informed me if there is no LEL reading then there is no concern. I recallbrated equipment and rechecked area readings tn alr ranged from 20 - 30 ppm, borehole 8 ppm, and LEL remained between 0-1[. Air sampling re~ained continuous. 3:00 Nlnd picked up and methane levels dropped. 5:15 Completed drtlltng for the day - 60". Ortller began cleanup. 6:30 Left site. 05308/77 DATE: 6-3-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Cable tool drilled 60' at MH-3D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): Air monitoring and borehole (see monitoring reports). VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): Obtained some high results on OVA for methane but no LEL readings insuring no explosive danger. PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEWED BY: 0530B/78 I I ! I I ! I I I I I 1 I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 27 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 118-121 PROJECT: ADDRESS: NEATHER: Southold Landfill 1027-B03 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Rain (PM) TEMPERATURE: (AM) 60°F (PM) °F SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 4-7 MPH (PM) MPH NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino DATE: 6-4-9] (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) SE (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:00 0530B/79 I I I I I I ii I Ii ! i I I I DATE: 6-4-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): g:o0 12:00 7:30 Arrived at site. Calibrated equipment. 8:00 Drillers arrived at site, concerned about heavy rain regarding the cable tool drilling. 8:15 Bob called Lou at R&L to discuss drilling in rain. Sal went to fill truck with water. Drillers had to fix mandrill and cable on rig. Began drilling. First spoon was taken at 60 feet, but because of rocks there was no recovery. l:O0 Obtained first split spoon sample at 65". 4:25 Drilled to 85'. Cleaned split spoons. Continuous air, borehole and breathing zone monitoring was taken from 12:00 to 5:00. Drillers unloaded their truck. All left site. 5:30 6:00 7:00- 8:00 Paperwork at hotel. 0530B/80 ! I I I ! I ! ,! I i ! DATE: 6-4-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Drilled 25 feet (60 to 85). Took split spoons (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): See equipment usage sheets. VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEWED BY: 0530B/81 ! I I ! I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 28 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: (AM) Cloudy (PM) Cloudy PROJECT NO: 123-127 County Road 48, Cutchogue. NY 1027-B03 TEMPERATURE: (AM) 50°F (PM) 50°F SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 3-5 MPH (PM) 11 MPH NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino Lou DATE: 6-5-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) NW (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:30 0530B/82 il I I I I I ! I ! t I I I I i I I I I DATE: 6-5-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 7:30 8:00 8:20 8:45 ]0:30 ]0:35 ]2:20 ]2:30 ]:30 2:]5 3:00 5:22 5:45 6:30 7:30- 8:30 I arrived at site. Calibrated equipment. Loaded truck. Drillers arrived, loaded up truck. Set up MW-3D. Obtained breathing zone readings. Obtained first split spoon sample. Went to town office to phone J. Joyce of Health and Safety to discuss a problem with my respirator - not available. Returned to drill site. Phoned Health & Safety, contacted J. Joyce and set up a respirator switch with the company. Returned to drtll site. Had to stop drilling due to heavy rain. Rain stopped, drilling continued. Low arrived at site. Took last split spoon for day (125-127) which obtained 17 inches of clay. Will set screen at 125 tomorrow. Drillers clean up at drill site. I went up to charge the equipment and unpack truck. Left site. Did paperwork in hotel. 0530B/83 I I ! I I I I I I I I I I i t I I I DATE: 6-5-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Drilled 40 feet at MAL3D. Obtained 9 split spoons (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEHED BY: 05308/84 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !1 I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 29 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 129-13l PROJECT: ADDRESS: WEATHER: TEMPERATURE: Southold Landfill 1027-B03 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Sunny, calm (PM) Sunny, calm (AM) 55°F HIND SPEED (AM) (PM) 75°F (PM) RAINFALL: SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sa1 Lazzerino Gerish Oesat Papachan Oaniel DATE: 6-6-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES MPH HIND DIRECTION (AM) MPH (PM) AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L NYSDEC NYSDEC SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:00 0530B/85 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-6-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 9:15 11:15 12:15 7:30 I arrived at s}te. Calibrated equipment, unloaded truck. 8:00 Drillers arrived, unloaded truck and set up at Mkt-3D. 8:45 Phoned Pete Conde to discuss setttng screen for MI~-3D at 125' based on yesterday's split spoon (125-127' - 17" of clay). Pete agreed to set screen at 125'. 9:00 I checked both the borehole and breathing zone with OVA and LEL - no readings. Drillers set screen and began bumping casing. NYSDEC personnel leave site. Drillers truck ran out of water. Sale took truck and filled with water. 1:20 Drillers continued grouting and bumping casing. 5:30 Ortllers complete casing removal for the day - 65 ft. of casing was removed. Drillers pack up truck and return to trailer and unload for day. I unload equipment. 6:00 All personnel leave site. 0530B/86 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-6-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Pulled 65 ft. of casing from MH-3D and grouted (see previous page for details).. LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEWED BY: 0530B/87 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT TEMPERATURE: REPORT NO: 30 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY HEATHER: (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny, calm (AM) 60°F WIND SPEED (AM) 2-4 MPH (PM) 85°F (PM) -- MPH PROJECT NO: 133-134 SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: 1027-B03 RAINFALL: NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sa1 Lazzerino DATE: 6-7-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES HIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) -- AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 05308/88 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-7-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 7:30 I arrived at site. 8:00 Drillers arrived at site and went to fill truck with water. 8:40 Drillers continued bumping casing from MW-3D. l:O0 Drillers completed bumping casing from MW-3D (60 ft. was removed today). 2:00 Sal left site to fill truck with water again so drillers can steam clean equipment. 2:30 Sal returns. Drillers begin steam cleaning. 3:30 Steam cleaning equipment complete. 4:00 All personnel left site. 5:30 Arrived home. 0530B/89 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-7-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Removed remaining casing from MH-3D. Steam cleaned equipment (see previous page for details), LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEWED BY: 05308/90 i I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 31 PROJECT NO: 1027-B03 FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 135-137 DATE: 6-10-91 PROJECT: Southold Landfill ADDRESS: WEATHER: County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY (AM) Sunny (PM) Sunny TEMPERATURE: (AM) 65°F (PM) °F SITE CONDITION: RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) (PM) (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES MPH WIND DIRECTION (AM) MPH (PM) PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME AFFILIATION Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sa1Lazzerino Lou Zackman Phil Zackman D&B R&L R&L R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0530B/91 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-10-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 9:15 10:50 3:30 6:00 Left for Southold. 7:30 Arrived at site, unpacked truck, calibrated equipment. 8:00 Drillers arrived. Sal went to fill truck with water. 8:30 Sal returned. Drillers began loading truck and moving rig to MI~-ID. I loaded my truck with air monitoring equipment. Took background air monitoring (see air monitoring equipment). Began drilling at 14H-lO. Had drilled 60 ft. of casing and drJllers prepared for first split spoon sample. 3:35 Lou and Phil Zackman of R&L arrived at site. 4:05 Lou and Phil Zackman left site. 4:10 First split spoon sample taken. 5:00 Drillers began cleanup at MH-1D. 5:30 Drillers and myself left site. 0530B/92 DATE: 6-10-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Set up rig and began drilling of MW-1D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEWED BY: 0530B/93 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 32 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 159-143 PROJECT: ADDRESS: WEATHER: Southold Landfill County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 (AM) Sunny (PM) Haze TEMPERATURE: (AM) 75°F (PM) 8g°F SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 2-4 MPH (PM) 2-4 MPH NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sa1Lazzerino DATE: 6-11-91 (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) NW AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 5:30 0530B/94 m m I I I I I I I m t I I I DATE: 6-11-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOWN): 7:30 I arrived at site, calibrated equipment and loaded truck. 8:00 Drillers arrive at site and loaded truck. 8:15 Sal left site to fill truck with water. 8:50 Sal returns, drillers begin drilling at MW-1D. l:O0 Drillers stopped for lunch. I tried to find UPS so I could send respirator back to Health & Safety. I was unsuccessful. 1:20 Drillers begin drilling again. 4:30 Drillers begin cleanup for day at MW-1D, returned to trailer to unload truck. I returned to office and put equipment on charge. Drillers and I left site. 5:15 5:30 6:30- 7:30 I did paperwork at hotel. 05308/95 I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I i DATE: 6-11-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Calibrated equipment, supervised drilling at MH-ID (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEHED BY: 0530B/96 I I I I I I I I DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 33 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 145-149 PROJECT: ADDRESS: HEATHER: (AM) Cloudy (PM) Cloudy, rain TEMPERATURE: (AM) 68°F (PM) 85°F 1027-B03 Southold Landfill County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY RAINFALL: HIND SPEED (AM) 5 MPH (PM) 2-6 MPH DATE: 6-12-gl (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) N (PM) N m m m ! SITE CONDITION: PERSONNEL ON SITE: NAME Frances Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L m m I I SUBCONTRACTOR HORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) (AM) 8:00 (PM) (PM) m 0530B/97 m I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-12-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDOHN): 4:30 5:30 $:00 7:00- 8:00 7:30 Arrived at site, calibrated equipment and loaded up truck. 8:30 Drillers arrived and began setting up. 8:45 Phoned Pete to discuss when other rig was coming out and drilling procedures. g:o0 Began drilling. 4:15 Bob Noud got something in his eye while welding cable tool casing - rinsed out with saline and will go to doctor tonight. Bob phoned Low to inform him of the incident. Continued drilling. Heavy rain cleaned up at MW-1D. Had drilled to 137'. All personnel left site. I completed paperwork in hotel. 0530B/98 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I DATE: 6-12-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL HORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Drilled to 137 ft. at MN-ID (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): See equipment usage sheets. VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEHED BY: 05308/99 I I ! I I t I I I I I ! i I I I ! DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT NO: 34 PROJECT NO: FIELD LOG BOOK PAGE NUMBER: 160 PROJECT: ADDRESS: WEATHER: Southold Landfill County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 1027-B03 (AM) Sunny, windy (PM) TEMPERATURE: (AM) 53°F (PM) 78°F SITE CONDITION: Good PERSONNEL ON SITE: RAINFALL: WIND SPEED (AM) 12-15 MPH (PM) 8-10 MPH NAME Fran Tooher Bob Noud Sal Lazzerino DATE: 6-13-gl (AM) INCHES (PM) INCHES WIND DIRECTION (AM) NW (PM) NW AFFILIATION D&B R&L R&L SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMMENCEMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR WORK COMPLETION: (AM) 8:00 (AM) (PM) (PM) 6:00 0530B/lO0 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I ! DATE: 6-13-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT NORK PERFORMED TODAY BY SUBCONTRACTOR(S) (INCLUDES EQUIPMENT AND LABOR BREAKDONN): 7:30 8:00 8:50 10:00 11:42 5:00 5:30 6:00 7:00- 8:00 I arrived at site and calibrated equipment. Loaded truck. Drillers arrived at site to fill truck with water. Sal returned. Drillers resumed drilling at MW-ID. Drillers are having a heaving problem in the well. Almost lost hammer in hole. Drilled to 148'. Bailed - all fine sand - passed on sample for risk of losing hammer in hole. Dumped out 12 1/2 foot of casing for the day. Drillers cleaned up at MW-1D. Drillers unloaded truck. I went to main office and unloaded truck. Put equipment on charge labeled and boxed sampler. All personnel left site. I did paperwork at hotel. 0530B/101 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE: 6-13-91 DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT GENERAL WORK PERFORMED TODAY BY D&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Bumped casing from MW-1D (see previous page for details). LIST SPECIFIC INSPECTION(S) PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS): LIST TYPE AND LOCATION OF TESTS PERFORMED AND RESULTS (INCLUDE EQUIPMENT USED AND MONITORING RESULTS): VERBAL COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM SUBCONTRACTOR (INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROBLEMS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS/RESULTING ACTIONS): PREPARED BY: Frances Tooher REVIEHED BY: 0530B/102 Appendix B DATA VAI .IDATION REPORT B-1 - Data Validation Review Sheets $14660 I I1 I I ! I I I I I B-2 - Data Validation Summm'ics and Data User Advisory Tables DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS I. Data Deliverable Requirements A. Legtble ~.,).. B. Pagtnated C. Arranged tn order D. Consistent dates E. Case Narrative Yes F. Chain-of-Custody Record G. Sample Data Complete H. Standard Date Complete I. Raw OC Data Complete No No No No NO' NO NO ~0 Comments: I I I ! I I I ! I I 1 I i Site Name:~ I. Data Deliverable Requirements A. Legible B. Paginated C. Arranged in order O. Consistent dates E. Case Narrative F. Chain-of-Custody Record G. Sample Data Complete H. Standard Date Complete I. Raw QC Data Complete Comments: Yes No No No No No No I I I I I I ! I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS ~//~l Laboratory Name: I. Data Deliverable Requiremeots Date of Review: A. Legible Yes (~ B, Paginated (~ No C. Arranged in order ~__~ No D. Consistent dates (~ No E. Case Narrative Yes F. Chain-of-Custody Record ~ NO G. Sample Data Complete No H. Standard Date Complete ~Yes /~?~- No I. Raw OC Data Complete ~ No Comments: /~'/L~O/ (], m m ! m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Site Name: ~'~k~,i~/lJ[~d ~(~ ~0 Laboratory Name: ~L~r ~)l~t(~)~O~j~ Reviewer: ~l ~j~f~u Date of Review: ~JY41~I I. Holding times ~1 ~' 6~"'~ ~/ I--~S Date Date )ate Hol, ing Time Sample I.D. ~S~S Received ~i 871~ ~ Digested Ar ~l),zed :ceeded? m I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Site Name: ~c~C)\<~ ~_~--tVl~]l( Laboratory Name: Reviewer: (~,~.,~t~( Date of Review: Associated Samples: Jill /,'s~d II. Initial Calibration 1. Were all initial Comments: instrument calibrations performed? No m m m 2. Were the initial calibration verification standards analyzed at the contract specified frequency? Comment ~: m m m m m 3. Were the initial calibration results within the control below? For tin and mercury: 80-120% of the true value For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value If "No", note analytes limits listed m '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Associated Samples:~ III. Continuing Calibration 1. Were the continuing calibration verification standards analyzed at the contract specified frequency? Comments: Were the continuing calibration results within the control limits listed below? For ~ mercury: 80-120% of the true value For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value If "No", note analytes m I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Site Name:~OAJ~Ot~ ~C~'ll Reviewer:~ Laboratory Name: Date of Review: IV. Blank Summary A. Method Blanks 1. Was a method blank prepared and analyzed at the contract specified frequency? 2. Were all the analytes below the CRDL in the method blank? C°ments:~0 m m m m B. Calibration Blanks Coments: 1. Were all initial and continuing calibration blanks analyzed at the contract specified frequency? 2. Were all the analytes below the CRDL in all the calibration blanks? AJ~ O~!TT~ . m m m I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Site Name: ~.~-~ Reviewer: ~(~, Laboratory Name: /~ Oate of Review: Vw Duplicate Analysis 1. Was a duplicate prepared and analyzed at the contract specified frequency? Comments: m m i m m m m m m 2. Were control limits for the relative percent differences (RPD) met for each analyte? Yes Comments: ~ . , For sample values >5 times the CRDL, the RPD control limit is ~20%. For sample values <5 times the CRDL, the RPD control limit is !CRDL. If sample results were outside of the control iimits, all data associated with that duplicate sample should have been flagged with a "*". m I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Reviewer: Laboratory N~e:j~-~' ~b~~ Oate of Review: ~/C~/c~/ VI. Matrix Spike Analysis 1. Was a matrix spike prepared and analyzed at the contract specified frequency? Comments: ~ No m m m m m m m m 2. Were the matrix spike recovereis within the contract specified control limits (75-125%)? Yes If "No", note analytes Data should have been flagged with "N" for analytes out of control limits. If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of four or more, no flag is required. I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Site Name:~-~~ (~L~i~ aboratory Name: Reviewer: M , ~)~O~O(c1k~ Date of Review: VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Sumary 1. Was the ICP serial dilution analyzed at the contract specified frequen~ Comments: m 2. Were the serial dilution differences within the contract specified I m m m ~m limits of +-'w-10%? e~/ No Coments 3. Was the ICP CRDL check standard analyzed at the contract specified frequency for the analytes required? Coments m ~m m m I I I I I I I BATA VALIDATION - METALS Reviewer: _(~, ~tO_O(:~j~.~ Date of Review: VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Sumary {continued): 4. Was the ICP interference check sample analyzed at the contract specified frequ~ No Coment$: m 5. Were the ICP interference check sample results within the control limit m m m m m m m m of +aw-20% of the mean value? -- Ye~ No If "NO", note analytes m m m DATA VALIDATION - METALS VIII. Laboratory Contro) Sample Analysis 1. Was a laboratory control sample analyzed at the contract required f r equ~L~ \ Yes No Coments: ,m 2. Were the perecent recoveries within the control limits of 80-120% (except I m for Ag and Sb) for each analyte? (~5 ~o Con~ents m ,m m m ,m m I I I ! I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Site Name:. ~L//' Laboratory Name: Reviewer: Date of Review: IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis 1. Were duplicate injections performed for all analytes (except for the Method of Standard Addition [MSA] which requires single injections only)?~ No Comments: '\1~ ~0~/],~.~ I ~m m m m 2. Where the concentrations were above the CRDL, did the two runs agree within/~of the relative standard deviations for each analyte? If "No", note ana!ytes and check to see if the analytes were run again. If readings are still outside the control limits, all data associated with that analysis should have been flagged with an "M#. 3. Did the preparation blank analysis produce spike recoveries of 85-115%7 Comments m m m m I !1 I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Reviewer: Date of Review: IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis (continued): 4. Were analysis (post digest) spikes performed on all required samples and concentration levels (2x CRDL)? Yes ' ~ Comments ~,- m ! ~m sam5. For those samples whose.initial spike recovery ple dilutin and resp~king performed? was less than 40%, was _~ Yes No ~,~ Coment~ 6. Was the MSA performed at the contract specified frequency and did it m m follow the contract specified criteria? Coments m m m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name~'-[~({ ~L'[~ Laboratory Name:/~J~ZF] m evt ewer: C.4 Date of Review: m i. Data Dellverable Requirements m A. Legible Ye~~ No m B. Paginated ~, No " C. Arranged in order ~ NNO I D. Consistent dates ~ o E. Case Narrative ~ No I F. Chain-of-Custody Record Y~ NO m G. Sample Data Complete ~ No m m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Si te Name, ,.~_ ~CJ ~'U i~C~] Laboratory Name: Reviewer: ~-~ Date of Review: II. Holding Times Date Date Hold tng Ti me Received Extracted Exceeded ? Date Anal vzed 'F/} ~,/~ / m m m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name Laboratory Name: Reviewer: .~.,~)C(~(~L~J_ Date of Revlew:~/~Ohl ' Date Date Holding Time Sample I.D. Received Extracted ~~ Exceeded ~o~~ ~l, m m m m m m m m m m i I I Site Name: Reviewer: Fraction: DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Laboratory Name: Date of Review: III. Tune Sumary Tune Ftle I.D. Number 4. Acceotable ? Comments m I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I Rev t ewer: Fraction: DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS ,~C~C~!Laboratory Name: Date of Review: IV. Initial Calibration Summary (GCIMS) Date of Calibration: ~?Lil~l~l A. Standard Data Files Standard 1 ID: ~.iqCz~ Standard 2 ID: ~/£/~l~ Standard ) ID: ~iq(~ Standard 4 ID: ~/0/ /() Standard S ID: F/c//~ B. 1. All SPCCmet Criteria ? No m m i I I I I I I I Fraction: k,)t:'~ <~'~'/-~ DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Laboratory Name: Date of Calibration: IV. Initial Calibration Sun~ary (continued) 2. All CCC met Criteria ? No ! I I ! m m C. 1. Nas the tune for the initial calibration acceptable ? NO 2. Was the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune ? Comments: !,,)'© Flt~,'Y'Yl ;K'tq ¢ ~ · m ! I m O. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associated samples) , _, _. / - _ ~ y m I I I I I I I I ! ! I I !1 I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name.~ ~~7/Laboratory Name: Reviewer:~{~., (~(~ Date of Review: IV. Initial Calibration Summary Date of Calibration: A. Standard Data Files Standard 1 ID: Standard 2 ID: Standard 3 I8: ~,~'l'-~.-{~ Standard 4 ID: Standard $ ID: B. 1. All SPCC met Criteria ? Yes Conc: Conc: Conc:, Conc:. Conc: .o~d 6oi/~oL 2. Calculate a SPCC average RRF Comments: k)~ a~~. Im m m I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Si ,e Name~fi~_,~ J~(~ _t~..~u '{(Laboratory Name: ~ Fraction: ~0~ ~O/~a ~ Date of Review: Date of Ca,ibration: IV. Initial Calibration Summary (continued) 2. All CCC met Criteria ? /[JO ~L~ Yes Comments: ! I ! m Calculate a ccc ~ ~so YO,/~ 1. Nas the tune for the initial calibration acceptable ? Yes 2. Was the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune Yes No ~y~ Comments: m i I De Overall assessment of the initial (list the associated samples) ~!1 ~ ~ ~ cal lbration: m i m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Rev~ewor:~, ~~Jl Date of Review: V. Pesticide Initial Calibration Summary Col umn: .?) ~:;~1 '~-~ I ~,m~ry~ , Date of Call;rat;on: ~_I~)~]C/~ ~_!OL/]C/! A. Analytical Sequence Check Acceptable ? l y~ No confirmation I ! l Comments: Has the retention time of 4,4'-DDT greater than 12 minutes ? No m i ! I I Calculation Comments: Nas the lineartty check criteria (± 10% RSD on the quantttation column) met ? NO m I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Pesticide Intttal Calibration Summary (continued) D. Was the breaKdowm o~ 4,~'-DD~ and Endr~n less than 2~ ? (<20% each for the 1% column) (<20~ combined for the 3~ OV-1 column) Calculation E. Were the retention times and retention time windows acceptable ? .o F. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associates samples) DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary Column: '~)~])(~/ ~ confirmation Dateof Initia, Calibration: ~?')~(~t- ~/Ot~/~/ Date of Continuing Calibration:- ' StOV[~I File ID: A. Did the pesticide standard compounds show a % O of the calibration factor of less than 15% tf it was a quantitatlon run or 20% if it was a confirmation run for all compounds identified ? Calculate a compound's calibration factor for the standard. /-¢'~,~o~/_ - : Calculate a compound's % D value. m m Comments: m ! ! ! I I I I ! I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS , VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary (continued) °ate of Co.tinuin, C.,,br.tto.: S/O~//~! .,e ,0: B. Did each compound's retention ttme fall within the window ? C~ments: J~O ~~ NO m iI C. Here the DBC retention time shtfts within the specified ltmtts ? (~ 2% for packed columns, ~ 0.3% for capillary columns) Calibrate a DBC RT % O I ! ! (List the associated samples) Overall assessment of the continuing calibration: m ! I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:80_O_~)¢.~ ~4,'/l~aboratory Name: V. Pesticide Inlttal Calibration Summary ~rm~ A. Analytical Sequence Check Acceptable ? No B. Has the retention time of 4,4'-DDT greater than 12 minutes ? C~ents: ~0 0~ m ! ! I I Ce Nas the ltneartty check criteria (~ 10% RSD on the~ column) met ? Yes ~ Calculation '-l' %, DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name.~_L~(~ ~boratory Name: ~e~:~,~~. ~ o~ ~v~: V. Pesticide Initial Calibration Summary (continued) _ D. ~as the breakdown of 4,4 -DDT and Endrtn less than 20~ . E. Here the retention times and retention time windows acceptable F. Overall assessment of the initial calibration. (list the associates samples) , m m ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Date of Review: VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary I m m I l Column: ~)~:~::~2~Cl~ primary Date of Initial Calibration: Date of Continuing Calibration: co~rmatton~ File ID: A. Did the pesticide standard compounds show a % O of the calibration factor of less than 15% if it was a quantttation run or 20% if it was a confirmation run for all compounds identified ? Calculate a compound's calibration factor for the standard. I m ! Calculate a compound's % O value. comments:~L~ m I I m I I I I I I ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:~C~_~~ ~4i/Laboratory Name: ~)~ Reviewer:v~.;,?Kl_.~Ot~J'l~[~ Date of Review: VII. Pesticlde continuing Calibration Summary (continued) Date of Continuing Calibration: _~/a~-Jrhl File ID: B. Did each compound's retention time fall within the window ? .o I m I ! i for packed columns, ± 0.3% for capillary columns) C. Were the DBC retention time shifts within the specified limits ? (t 2% No Calibrate a DBC RT % D Comments: -- m m m O. Overall assessment of the continuing calibration: (List the associated samples) r -- V m ~ ! m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: ~ Fraction: '~[-~ VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date o~ Co.tt..t.g Caltbratto.: '~18~l~l A. 1. All SPeC met criteria ? Laboratory Date of Review: NO Comments: Comments: All CCC met criteria ? No B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Fraction: J Date o, Revie.: ~)~1 ~olo,/~ I VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date o1' Initial Calibration: . . . Date of Continuing Calibration: ~/~C'iC( I A. !. All SPCC met criteria ? No Comments: A/G (.~J'~- 2. All CCC met criteria ? Comments: NO B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Fraction: VIII. Internal Standard Area Summary (GC/MS) Were all internal standard peak area, within the contract limits If Ho, please note below. Internal Standard Amount Above Sample ~ Contract Reoutrement Comments ~J lh Laboratory Name:)~ m Reviewer: C~;t - Date of Review.' C~)~(©lq ) Fra ~'~.~/0 ! ' m ix. Blan~ Sugary m Date/Time of An~ly~i$: File ID~. m Compound ~ ~ CROL Site Namet~'~L~"~ ~Lp~ ~ Laboratory Name: Comments ~m m m m List the samples associated with this method blank. m _ , - I m m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: '~ Date of Review: Fraction: X. Surrogate Recovery Summary Here all surrogate recoveries within the contract limits If No, please note below. SamD 1 e Surrogate Compound Outside Recovery Limits Amount Above Contract Reautrement Comments m I · DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS , m x,. Matrix Sptke/.Matrix Spike Duplicate Sugary/ m Did the MS/MSD recovery data meet the contract reco~end[d requirements I I, ,0 - · , I I I I I I DATA .VA L I DA T I ON -ORGAN I CS s, te Name: ~IC)AJLq~ ~'l! Laboratory Name: ~tJ~ Reviewer:(~J~.,,~>c:~OlO~:~J'LI ) Date of Review: I. Dat~ Del~e~ Requirements A. Legible ~ No C. Arranged In order ~Yes ~ No D. Consistent dates ~ No E. Case Narrative ~, No F.Chain-of-Custody Record ~, No ~. Sample Data Complete ~ No Comments: m ii. Holding Ttmes m Samole I.D. Re~ea~veed DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:f~12kt )tL~_ ~f/~[J Laboratory Name: [~D2.t~'~ v Date Date Holdtng Time Extracted Anal vzed Exceeded ? m m m I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer:~:~,~-~(~ Date of Review: Fraction: III. Tune Summary Tune File I.D. Number Acceptable ? Comments I m m m ! m m I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:~kX.~J/~ ,(ILaboratory Name: Date of Review: Fraction:~ IV. Initial Calibration Summary (GC/MS Oate of Calibration: A. Standard Data Files Con~: /50 Standard 2 ID: ~T~(~ Standard 3 ID: c~ ~)C~') Standard 4 ID: ~"~ ~ Standard 5 ID: ~__~~ m m m ! Conc: Con(:: B. 1. All SPCC met Criteria ? No m i I 2. Calculate a SPCC average RRF Comments: m ,! m ,m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Fraction: IV. Initial Calibration Summary (continued) Date of Review: Date of Caltbr,tion: 2. All CCC met Criteria ? Comments:~]0 ~Xl4_Y/1FI 0/A--~ NO m ! m m ! ! Calculate a CCC ~ RSD C. 1. Was the tune for the initial calibration acceptable ? 2. Was the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune ? ~ .° Comments: ~D O_~)J/14.jry~O~_~~ m m m D. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associated samples) m m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS . Fraction: VI. Continuing Calibration Sugary (GC/MS) A. ]. All SPCC met criteria ? Calculate a SPCC RRF 2. All CCC met criteria Calculate a CCC % O No B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) m AA D T .VALIDATION-ORGANICS ! ~ VI. ConHnu~ng Calibration Summary A. I. AI~ SPCC met cr~ter}a ? Calculate a SPCC RRF . 2. All CCC met criteria ? Calculate a CCC ~ D , (list associates samples) DATA .VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: ~, ~.~.~__~L~I~,~. · Date of Review: VIII. Internal Standard Area Summary (GC/MS) ~ere all internal standard peak areas within the contract limits If No, please note below. Yes Samole ~1 L~ard ~gn~tR~ba~emen t Comments ~~.~/ m m m m I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS R~v~r: ~, ~Oa~ Date o~ ~tew: Fractlon: IX. Blank Summary Date/T, me of Analysls: File IO:~ ComPound Concentration _< CROk Comments List the samples associated with this method blank. I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS ReviewerS. ~'~./_~_0~.~_~'! Date of Review: Fraction: X. Surrogate Recovery Summary Here all surrogate recoveries within the contract limits ? If No, please note below. Surrogate Compound Amount Above SamDl~ Outside Recovery Limits Contract ReDuirement Comments m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Fractio.: A]R XI. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Sample ID: AFl ~'~/'C)~_~'v~6,~ Matrix: / Did the MS/MSQ/recovery data meet the contract recommended requirements ? Yes If No, please note below. DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS I. Data Deliverable Requirements A. Legtble Ye~s No B. Paginated ~ No C. Arranged tn order (~ No F. Chain-of-Custody Record (~ No G. Sample Data Complete (~ No H. Standard Date Complete ~ No I. Raw QC Data Complete ~ No DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Il. Holdtng Times Date Date Recetved Extracted Date Holdtng Ttme AnaJ_vy~ed Exceeded ? ~VO~~ ~ .,,, DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer:~__ Fraction: ' Date of Review:~ f~ ~/ Tune File I.D. Number l. Acceotable ? Y~Fi Comments 6. 7. 10. ! ! I ! I I I I ! i ! '1 I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name: aboratory Name: Revi ewer: _~ t ~].~ Ll~_~ U Fraction: Date of Review: IV. Initial Calibration Summary (GC/MS Date of Calibration: A. Standard Data Files Standard 1 ID: Standard 2 ID: Standard 3 ID: Standard 4 ID: Standard 5 ID: co.c: Conc: Conc: Conc: /~g Conc: B. 1. All SPCC met Criteria ? 2. Calculate a SPCC average RRF No I m ! I ! I ! ! I ,11 DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Oate of Calibratio.: 7/f 7 ,~,~ IV. Initial Calibration Summary (continued) 2. All CCC met Criteria ? Comments: ~)~ O~O,~md-jd NO ! ! I ! ! Calculate a CCC % RSD C. 1. Was the tune for the initial calibration acceptable ? 2. Was the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune ? ~ .o O. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associated samples) DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:~(~/Laboratory'I Name: ¥ Reviewer:~~ Fraction: C.-~; Date of Review: IV. ~, Calibration Summary (GCIHS) Date of Calibratton:~ A. Standard Data Files Standard liD: VeTIO Standard 2 ID: Standard 3 ID: Standard 4 ID: Standard 5 ID: B. 1. All SPCC met Criteria ? Conc: lO ,..~.J::) J Conc: Conc: Conc: Con c: Yes No Comments:_ _~- lO pp)o. Calculate a SPCC average RRF /~t 7~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I ! I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Date of Review: ~!,~./~l Date of Calibration: ~! a !ql IV. ImmWd~m,L Calibration Summary (continued) 2. All CCC met Criteria ? Yes No Comments: C~,/~oL Calculate a CCC % RSD Has the tune for the initial calibration acceptable Yes No Yes Comments: ~(]/1 t/~JJl 0 ~I'ooLu~y~ 2. Was the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune No ! ! I O. Overall assessment of the :altbratton: (llst the associated sampleS) ....... ~ , ! I ! m FracHon: I VI. Cont tng Ci I Date of Initial Ci m Date of Conttnutn! I A. 1. All SI _ Calculate,a Si Comments :__ I 2. All m Calculiatea m B. overal 1 j (list a! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Si te Name:?~L,.A"6~Cm'5 ~AJD~/I I Reviewer: fc~ j.~-~-j (I Q c~lJq L~ Laboratory Name: Date of Review: Contt nut ng Cal tbratlon Summary (GC/MS) Calibration: Oate of Continuing Calibration.' File ID: E a OS ~ SPCC met criteria ? No Calculate a SPCC RRF All CCC met criteria Calculate a CCC '/, O No Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) ! m I I ! I i I ! I I VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date of Initial Calibration: Date of Continuing Calibration: ~-f [/ 1. All SPCC met criteria ? Calculate a SPCC RRF No ~mments: I l ! I 2. All CCC met criteria ? Calculate a CCC % D 3,~/ Comments: No ! i i I B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) m ! I I I ! I t t I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: Fraction: Date o~ RevUe.: ~/t~lfil VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date of Initial Calibration: Date of Continuing Calibration: File ID: Pr-'~ I0~0 1. Ali SPCC met criteria Calculate a SPCC RRF Co~ents: I l ! I Calculate a CCC % D I,. ~-'~, a. iE., o,u~ ,~..ta~cuk¢ All CCC met criteria ? O, 573- O, O, 5¥3 = (::,,¥.E-o.-- _--> ~ents: B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) ! I ! I ! ! I I ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name: ~fl. ~ aboratory Name: Reviewer: ~(~,~(~]~ Date of Review: Fraction: ~/0~ ~'/~ 4~) VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date of Initial Calibration: Date of Continuing Calibration: File As 1. All SPCC met criteria ? Calculate a SPCC RRF Conments: No I I ! I 2. All CCC met criteria ? Calculate a CCC l~ D ~ents: No ! I I i B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS V. Pesticide Initial Calibration Summary Date of Calibration: confi rmation A. Analytical Sequence Check Acceptable ? No Comments: B. Has the retention time or.greater than 12 minutes ? C~mment s: Was the linearity check criteria (± lO[ RSD on the quantttation column) met ? 'Yes (~ Calculation Comments: I I I ! I I t I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:~~ ~llLaboratory Name: Reviewer:(~-~ Date of Review: V. Pesticide Initial Calibration Summary (continued) D. Was the breakdown of 4,4'-DDT and Endrtn less than 20% ? (<20% each for the 1% column) (<20% combined for the 3% OV-1 column) Calculatlon Co~ments: E. Were the retention times and retention time windows acceptable ? Comments: Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associates samples) ! I t I I I I ! I I I I i i I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:~_~[-~_ ~(~l~fil/]Laboratory Name: R e v iew e r: (~, ~C'-__~. ~) ~IjLJ/[~L~ Date of Review: VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary Col umn :~T~F !-i/'. ~ !.~~c°nfi rmatt on Date of Initlal Calibration: ~'~llro) I ~ Date of Continuing Calibration: ' 8(~,h/ -- File ID: A. Did the pesticide standard compounds show a % D of the calibration factor of less than 15[ if it was a quantitation run or 20[ if it was a confirmation run for all compounds identified ? Q~ No Calculate a compound's calibration factor for the standard. Calculate a compound's % D value. Comments: ! t I I ! ! ! ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name: ~0, .~ _~v'~Laboratory Name:~_~F~_~'~ Reviewer:~,~(1Q~l~ Date of Rev,ow: VII. Pesticide continuing Cal~bratJom Sugary (continued) Date of Continuing Calibration: ~J~ql File ID: B. Did each compound's retention time fall within the wJndo~ ? ! ! C. Here the DBC retention ttme shifts wtthtn the specified 11mits ? (t. 2% for packed columns, + 0.3?. for capillary columns) Calibrate a DBC RI ?. O Ccxmments: ~-~t9 ~..~(~Tl/~.~ C)J~) · D. Overall assessment of the continuing calibration: (List the associated samples) DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Vo Column:~ Date of Calibration: Pesticide Initial Calibration Summary A. Analytical Sequence Check Acceptable ? Comments: ~k'~O_ (/_[~d/l(_14~l. ~__.A~ B. Was the retention time or.greater than 12 minutes Was the lineartty check criteria (± 10% RSD on the quantitatlon column) met ? Yes" No~ Calculation '1 I I ! ! I ! I ! I Site Name: Reviewer:(~-~ V. Date of Review: Pestlctde Inttlal Callbrat~on Su~nar¥ (continued) Date of Calibration: _~ltcoJ~l --) S l~.J]_l DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS De Was the breakdown of 4,4'-DDT and Endrtn less than 20% ? No (<20% each for the 1% column) (<20% comblned for the 3% or-1 column) Calculatlon Comments: ~'"'~ O~ i I E. Here the retention ttmes and retention time wJndows acceptable ? Co~ents: i I i I I Overall assessment of the tnJtJal calibration: (11st the associates samples) I I I I I I I I t i I ! I ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Date of Review: VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary Column :ss~2~,- . orimary Date of ~nitial Cal,~ratton:_~-L~ Date of Continuing Calibration: File ID: A. Did the pesticide standard compounds show a % D of the calibration factor of less than 15% if it was a quantitatlon run or 20% if it was a confirmation run for all compounds identified ? ~ No Calculate a compound's calibration factor for the standard. Calculate a compound's % O value. I t I I i I I I I I ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:(_~_{) _ _ . aboratory Name: Reviewer: ~,~O_O~_J~JJ. _ Date of Review: VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary (continued) D.te of Continuing C.libr~tio.: ~ I~ ltl File ,D: B. Did each compound's retention time fall within the window ? Coraments:. m ! ! I I C. Were the DBC retention time shifts within the specified limits ? (± 2% for packed columns, ± 0.3% for cap~olumns) No Calibrate a DBC RT % D Comments:. 'i O. Overall assessment of the continuing calibration: (List the associated samples) m m ! ! I I 1 I 1 i II i I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:~ ~v'(I Laboratory Name: i~]¥~-~-- Fraction: ~/~ ~/ X. Surrogate Recovery Summary Were all surrogate recoveries within the contract limits ~f No. please note be,ow. [~ No *~m:~//i, Sample Surrogate Compound Outside Recovery Limits Amount Above Contract Reoulrement Comment~ Reviewer: Fraction: ?0 ~'-'~F- IX. Blank Sumary Date/Time I' An, ly. Comoound i Date/Time of Anal~sts: File ID: ~gncentratton ~ CROL Co~ents m List the samples associated with thts method blank. m I ! I I ! ! ! I I I ! I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name~ Revi ewer: ~ I ~aQ.OC~ Fraction: VIII. Laboratory Name: Date of Review: Internal Standard Area Summary (GC/MS) I~ere all internal standard peak areas within the contract limits ? If No, please note below. Internal Standard Outside Limits Amount Above Contract Renutrement Comments XI. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Ouplicai;e Sumary ~ ~/o ~, ~'/~ : Sample ID: ~ ) L~ Matrix !m Did the MS/MSD recovery data meet the contract recommended requirements ? Yes ~ %a/40 *' If No, please note below. Data Deliverable Requirements A. Legible ~ No B. Paginated ~es ~ No C. Arranged tn order ~) No D. Consistent dates ~ No E. Case Narrative ~ No F. Chain-of-Custody Record ~e~ No G. Sample Data Complete ~ No H. Standard Date Complete ~ No I. Raw ~ Data Complete ~)~ No ~ommen.: ~S~-~~-~ ~ ~ ~ " ~. ~ . DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: (~, ~%0, O_~C~J~ Date of Review: '1~ // II. Holding Times Date SamDle I.D. Received Date /L~- Date ~ Holdtng Time Extracted ~<m~4 Analyzed ^~t?.~Exceeded ? I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name~kr~l~d~_ _ _ aboratory Name: Reviewer:~O_~ Date of Review: Fraction: III. Tune Summary ~F'~ Tune File I.D. Number ~. ~5oqql ?. Acceotabl e ? Comment) yeS m m m m m m m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Reviewer: ~,r~C_~C~(~, Date of Review: Fraction.' ,[~](~ IV. Initial Calibration Summary (GC/MS Date of Calibration: A. Standard Data Files Standard 1 ID: Standard 2 ID: Standard 3 ID: Standard 4 ID: Standard 5 ID: B. 1. All SPCC met Criteria ? No 2. Calculate a SPCC averao. RRF t,1~>- cO,~o~ i 'J ~×°°~ll°r~aY'J~Pe~m~u'~ "~ 5'- - Comments: All o~r m m m m I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name .~ ~'J~!~_~.a bor atory Name: Reviewer: ~.t Fraction: IV. Inttial Calibration Summary (continued) 2. All CCC met Crlterla Date of Review: Date of Calibration: No m m m m m m Calculate a CCC % RSD ,o%O O, oG/f 1. Was the tune for the initial calibration acceptable ~ ,o 2. Was the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune ? Comments: /0~) ~)~/I/~[4o~Ls 6,0 5~.., I 'm m m D. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associated samples) im m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS m Site Name.~J ~~Laboratory Name: Revi ewer: ~_ ,,~(~(~)~.,,(. Date Of Revl ew: Fractio.: m VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) I I I I I I I I I Date of Initial Calibration: .~., c~ Date o~ Continuing Calimtion: rile ~.: iS51¥0 A. 1. All SPCC met criteria Calculate a S~CC RRF · ~-9~/ No 2. All CCC met criteria ? Calculate a CCC % D ,~o. m Comments: m m m m B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration~..~,. (list assoct~ates samples) Fraction: I I I I I I I I VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date of [nittal Calibration: ~T~I q I~l °ate of Continuing Cal~bratio.:J~e~ ~}C~ Ill A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ? Yes ~ Calculate a SPCC RRF No 2. All CCC met criteria ? ~Y~ No Calculate a CCC [ D ~ , :~ ~" - !~ ~. ~ .... ,, -"B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration ~mm~ (list associates samples) '1 I ! I I i I I I i I I I I'~ DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Fraction: Laboratory Name: Date of Review: VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date o~ ~nitia, Ca,,bration: ~[I ql~'t Date of Continuing Calibratl~~ ~ll3/~ / File IO: ls)~/~& A. 1. All SPCC met criteria Calculate a SPCC RRF NO Comments 2. All CCC met criteria Calculate a CCC % O No ~ -, .. ~ ' .. . _. , ~,i B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) m m I I I i I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Fractio.: ~F~ Oa~e o~ ,evt.: o//aah I VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date of Initial Calibration: '~-/J qjffl Date of Continuing Calibration: (~ll~[ql A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ? //~ ~o Calculate a SPCC RRF ~&, 2. All CCC met criteria ? Calculate a CCC % O No B. Overall as~?~t of Continuing Cal~' ~br~n "'" - (list associates samples) DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Namec~t~ ~/? Laboratory Name: Reviewer:W, ~O~U; Date of Review: ' VI. ContlnuIBg Ca)Ibratton Summary ..~ of Initial Calibration: ~' A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ~ Calculate a SPCC RRF "~ 2. All CCC met criteria ~ Calculate a CCC ~ D ~ ~ bver (1 assessmeWt ~T '~ontlnuing,~am,bratio. ~"/ (llst associates samples) I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name.~~(~ ~'~CLJ,[ ~C~Laboratory Name:,~5?~Y~' VIII. Internal Standard Area Sumary (GC/MS) Here all internal standard peak areas within the contract limits ? Yes If No, please note below. SamDle Internal Standard Amount Above Contract Reauirement Comments I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name _ I Laboratory Name. IX. Blank Summary Date/T,me of Analysts.' File ID: ~ld~~) Compound Concentration Comments List the samples associated with this method blank. m m m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Si te Name :~.~'~1.~1~d C]~C/~_~ Laboratory Name: ~k Reviewer: ~,,~~ Date of Review: Fraction: ~5~ IX. Blank Summary Date/Time of Analys, s: ComDound Concentration List the samples associated with this method blank. I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer:/c~,~O__J~LJ, Date of Review: IX. Blank Summary Date/Time of Analysis: Compound Concentration < CROL Comments List the samples associated with this method blank. m I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name: boratory Name: Reviewer: v(~. ,~J~Y~. Date of Review: Fraction: X. Surrogate Recovery Summary Were all surrogate recoveries within the contract limits Yes If No. please note below. SamD1 e Surrogate Compound Outside Recovery Limits Amount Above Contract Reauirement Comments m I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:~l Laboratory Name: Reviewer: ~, ~C~(~(~ Date Of Review: V Fraction: XI. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Gu,,,,,,a,-y FXlc~ Spi~9 F~ldlJd/-. SdB~FYIOF~/ Sample ID: I~/~L)--~S-6~L~ .atrix: I~]~F Did the MS/MSD/recovery data meet the contract recommended requirements ? Yes ~'?. ) If No, please note below. m m m m m m m m m DiTA VALIDATION-ORGANICS m Site Name:C~d ~(L~.'!l Laboratory Name: I Reviewer:~,S~_~Jq_~ Date of Review: '. ., ~~o I I. Data Deliverable Requirements ~0~ ~a~m~ B. Paginated. ~ D. Consistent dates ~ I E. Case Narrative ~ I G. Sample Data Complete ~ Laboratory Name: ~,V~J~ No No No No No~' No No I H. Standard Date Complete ~ No'~ I. Raw QC Data Complete No~' ~(/O~Comments: ~ ./~ ~ ! ~ I m m m m I DATA, VALIDATION-ORGANICS I Reviewer:/~~ Date of Review: ~ II. Holding T~mes ' ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I t I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS R e v i ewe r: _~.. LC~3OJ2 2E~QJ.I Date of Review: Fraction: ~C~3r ~ ~l.y 0 ' III. Tune Summary Tune File I.D. Number ACCeptable ? Comments ~. ~t qOT_ 5. 6. 8. 10. DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Fraction: C~,mS dO~Z~ Date of Review: IV. Initial Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date of Calibration: Ao Standard Data Files Standard 1 ID: Standard 2 ID: Standard 3 ID: Standard 4 ZD: Standard 5 ID: B. 1. All SPCC met Criteria ? No 2. Calculate a SPCC average RRF Comments: m m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS ! Rev i ewer :~., ,~C~rl ~Jq~ ~ Fraction: Oate of ,eview: ~o Date of Calibration: -~ .//(,-/~ / IV. Initial Calibration Summary (continued) 2. All CCC met Criteria ? No ! ! I I m I Calculate a CCC % RSD C. 1. Was the tune for the initial calibration acceptable ? (~) 2. Was the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune ? Comments: .~0 m m m O. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associated samples) m m I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer:g, Laboratory Name: Date of Review: m m m ! I I I I IV. Initial Calibration Summary (GC/MS Date of Calibration: ~/~ A. Standard Data Files Standard lID: ~ lqb~' Standard 2 ID: ~-- Standard 3 ID: Standard 4 ID: Standard 5 ID: B. 1. All SPCC met No m 2. Calculate a SPCC average RRF m Comments: m m m ,I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: Fraction: Laboratory Name: Date of Review/~)/~']~/ Date of Calibration: IV. Initial Calibration Summary (continued) 2. All CCC met Criteria ? No Calculate a CCC % RSD C. 1. Has the tune for the initial calibration acceptable ? 2. Nas the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune ? (~ No D. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associated samples) I I I I I I I ! I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name(~~(~ ~/~(~/7~aboratory Name: Reviewer:./~,SO~ Date of Review: Vo Pesticide Initial Calibration Summary Date of Calibration: ~I~?~-~'--Y~-I~I~I confirmation A. Analytical Sequence Check Acceptable ? No B. Nas the retention time of 4,4'-DDT greater than 12 minutes No Comments: ~k~ O_~f~l_ _~/~o..~ m ! im Calculation Nas the linearity check criteria (± 10% RSD on the quantitation column) met ? No I I ! I I I I ! ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:~(~ ~)~)(~u!'~[ Laboratory Name: ..... Reviewer:~),S~l(l~]Fl_)J~ Date of Review: V. Pesticide Initial Calibration Summary (continued) Date of Calibration: ~'!~.~J~l - =t'l~-~l'~l D. Nas the breakdown of 4,4'-DDT and Endrin less than 20% ? No (<20% each for the 1% column) (<20% combined for the 3% OV-1 column) Calculation Comments: ! m m E. Here the retention times and retention time windows acceptable ? No Comments: ~)0 ~--~~t m m m F. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associates samples) m m ! I I I ! 1 I ! I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer:~'SO~ Date of Review: Pesticide Initial Calibration Sun,nary Column: ,'~:>)::~ primary Date o~ Calibratio.: ~/a~Jll --q/~/ql A. Analytical Sequence Check Acceptable ? Comments: .~ ~y~ ~~ No I I i B. Nas the retention time of 4,4'-DDT greater than 12 minutes ? ~ ,o Co~ents: ]J~ O~:mur~md~ m I ! m m C. Nas the ]tnearity check criteria (± 10% RSD on the quantitation column) met ? No ~- m I I I I I I I I 1 I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Revi ewer:~=~ ~_A (1 I)~L~ Vo Pesticide Initial CalibratiOn Summary (continued) (<20% each for the 1% column) (<20% combined for the 3% OV-1 column) Has the breakdown of 4,4'-DDT and Endrtn less than 20% ? No Calculation Comments: I m ! E. Here the retention times and retention time windows acceptable ? ,o m i I F. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associates samples) m m ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name ~~Y VI. Continuing Calibration Sugary (GC/MS) Date of Initial Calibration:' A. 1. All SPCC met criteria No Calculate a SPCC RRF 2. All CCC met criteria Calculate a CCC Comments :~ B. Overall ~ssessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) m I ! I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Fraction: ~0_,~6 I]~ VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Laboratory Name: Date of Review: I 1 ! Date of I.itial Calibration: Date of Co.tinui.g Calibratio.: A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ? Calculate a SPCC RRF No Comments: L]E3 ~_ ~¥)(.~/~ (7 ~~' File ID:~_~/~ m ! m m ! 2. All CCC met criteria ? Calculate a CCC ~ ~ /,~_ Comments: ~ ~~ NO m m ! m Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS . m site Name~J.~y~ ~j~((~'~( Laboratory Name: ~/~F~ ~ m vii. Pesticide continuing Calibration Sugary. Date of Continuing Calibrat, on: ~/~l- ~/:~/S, ~,,, ~0: m A. Did the pesticide standard compounds show a % D of the calibration factor of less than 15~ if it was a quantitation run or 20~ if It was a m confirmation run for all compounds identified ? No Calculate a compound s calibration factor for the standard. Calculate a compound s % D value. m I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary (continued) B. Did each compound's retention time fall within the window ? m m Calibrate a DBC RT % D ~ Comments: /J~ ~__.'m~O~ C. Here the DBC retention time shifts within the specified limits ? (± 2[ for packed columns, ± 0.3[ for capillary columns) No m m ! D. Overall assessment of the continuing calibration: (List the associated samples) m m m I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Date of Review: VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary m I I I Date Of Initial Calibration: '~l~.'-~BI ' ~l~.h/ Date of Continuing Calibration: ~-I ~, !91 -~[o1'~/9! File ID: A. Did the pesticide standard compounds show a IC D of the calibration factor of less than 15lC if it was a quantitation run or 20% if it was a confirmation run for all compounds identified ? No m m Calculate a compound's calibration factor for the standard. O,oS'- Calculate a compound's % D value. :m cOmments: /(jO ~(2'4.~ I m m m m m I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: Laboratory Name: VII. Pesticide continuing Calibration Summary (continued) Date of Continuing Calibration: 22~4~.~hl -~[I~.~ff~File ID: B. Did each compound's retention time fall Comments: ~0 (IJD~J/)(//~)q_O~__.~ , within the window No m C. Here the OBC retention time shifts within the specified limits ? (± 2% m for packed columns, ± 0.3~ for capillary columns) ~ .o m calibrate a OBC RT % D Comments: m m m m D. Overall assessment of the continuing calibration: (List the associated samples) m m m m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name.~d ~'// Date of Review: /0 /~)~'/c7! VIII. Internal Standard Area Summary (GC/MS) Here all internal If No, please note below. Internal Standard SamD1 e ~ standard peak areas within the contract limits ? Amount Above Contract Reouirement Comment) I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name~l~(~ ~(~'// Laboratory Name:~)V~O~ Reviewer:~,,~O~ Date of Review: Fraction: ~ ~/a/~a IX. Blank Sumary Date/Time of Analysls: Ftle ID: Concentration < CROL Comment~ I I List the samples associated with this method blank. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS S ~2~a ~ Fraction:I/OB ~&a{/&oz X. Surrogate Recovery Summary Date of Review: Here all surrogate recoveries within the contract limits ? ,~T/~&6 ~ No If No, please note below. Surrogate Compound Amount Above Samole Outside Recovery Omit~ Contract Reou~rement Comment~ m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer~,,_~O~:~l~.j! Date of Review: XI. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Sumary ID: ~~ Matrix: Did the MS/MS,recovery data meet the contract recommende~requirements m m m m m m I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name :~')~ ~[~ ~'l I ~evi ewer:_~ Laboratory Name: Date of Review: /__OJ t'm '¢/- 70 ob I. Data Deliverable Requirements m m ! m m m m A. Legible B. Paginated C. Arranged in order D. Consistent dates E. Case Narrative F. Chain-of-Custody Record G. Sample Data Complete H. Standard Date Complete I. Raw QC Data Complete Comments: No No No No No No No No No m ! m m m m I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: _1~, r._~_l_{lO~/~l_~ Date of Review: II. Holding Times ~ ~ ~ Date Date Received Extracted Date Holding Time c Exceeded ? m I I I ! I I I ! I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer:~,~)(~_(~/L~ Date of Review: Fraction: III. Tune Summary Tune File I.D. Number o Acceptable ? o~ Comments m m m m m m I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:(~(~ [~A~Ii[I Laboratory Name: Reviewer:~,~O~ ~ate of RevUe.: Fraction: m iv. initial Calibration Summary (GC/MS) ! I I ! m Date of Calibration: ~/l~l~l A. Standard Data Files m Standard 1 ID: Standard 2 ID: Standard 3 ID: Standard 4 ID: Standard 5 ID: Conc: *~ ,~,b Co.c: Conc: I~0 B. 1. All SPCC met Criteria ? No m Calculate a SPCC average RRF .,,/,2. Yz Comments: m m m ! m I I I I I I I '1 DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name: ~raction: Date o~ nev~e.: Date of Calibration: ~/l~ [~ I IV. Initial Calibration Summary (continued) 2. Alt CCC met Criteria ? Comments: No m I m m ! Calculate a CCC ~ RSD C. 1. Was the tune for the initial calibration acceptable ? (~ No 2. Has the calibration conducted within 12 hours of the tune ? m m m m D. Overall assessment of the initial calibration: (list the associated samples) I ?.Ri f) I I I I Reviewer: Fraction: DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:[~U~(~)~_ a~/~(~ ~'ll Laboratory Name: ~, ~o~m Date o, VI. Continuing Calibration Sunmary (GC/MS) m Date of Initial Calibration: Date of Continuing Calibration: ~I~l m A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ? ~ No m . File ID:_~ m m ! ! ,m 2. All CCC met criteria ? Calculate a CCC % O Comments: D~) ~ I, 33'-5 No 10, ~17- m m ! B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (list associates samples) '1 I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Revi ewer: ~ ~Q_{)~ J~jJ Fraction: Laboratory Name: Date of Review: VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date of Initial Calibration: ~//~ Date of Continuing Calibration: Ao 1. All SPCC met criteria Calculate a SPCC RRF Comments: /~-~) No ~2~a30 y< yO ~ile zo:_~q%~ -- O, md/8 m :m I m 2. All CCC met criteria ? Calculate a CCC % D Comments: .~)m NO m B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (llst associates samples) I I I I I I I I I ! i DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name:Q~(2k~ ~J~H~.I/ Laboratory Name:~J~/~Ji~ Fraction: ~Xj¢~ VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/MS) Date of Initial Calibration: '~l~ i(~l Date of Continuing Calibration: =~-I~Ol~l A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ? /~ NO Calculate a SPCC RRF Comme.ts: X]O ~_c~w~vLO~it~ File ZD: L-~%(~/~ m 2. All ccc met criteria ? ! Calculate a CCC~0 ,3o?_,~ m B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration (llst associates samples) ! I I I I I I I I I i I I i I I I I ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Si te Name: C~~ ~.~AO~.,~Laboratory Name: ~ Reviewer: ~,<~O~O..o~.j~q_j_l Date of Review: VIII, Internal Standard Area Summary (GC/MS) Here all internal standard peak areas within the contract limits ? No If No, please note below. Sample Internal Standard Outside Limits Amount Above Contract Reau~rement Comments '1 DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS I IX. Blank Summary I Compound Concentrati on < CROL ! I I List the samples associated with thts method blank. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !1 I I ! DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Reviewer: ~{~//~O~J ~/~,~.~ Date of Review: Fraction: ~k]~ X. Surrogate Recovery Summary Nere all surrogate recoveries within the contract limits If No, please note below. [~ No Sample Surrogate Compound Outside Recovery Limits Amount Above Contract ReQuirement Comments !1 I I I I i I I il I I I I 1 I i I DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name.~ L~ .~[I Laboratory Name:.~/~_H R e v i ewe r: ~:~. ,C~(]~O ~[~/I~_~ Date of Review: XI. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Sample ID: .~L4~ ~ Matrix: _~)'! ~ Did the MS/MS, recovery data meet the contract recommended requirements ? If No. please note below. [ l' '. 7 ........ ,m m m DATA VALIDATION-ORGANICS Site Name.~ ~A(~Ill Laboratory Name:L)~ Date of Review: ta[O~ [~/ I. Data Deliverable Requirements ~-~-K)(~,K,(i~J~LJ C~ A. Legible ('~e~ No B. Paginated ~ No C. Arranged in order No D. Consistent dates k, ye~ No E. Narrative Yes ~(No~I Case F. Chain-of-Custody Record ~Yes~ No G. Sample Data Complete ~es~ No H. Standard Date Complete ~Ye~ No I. Raw QC Data Complete ~ No Comments: ! m m m m I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Reviewer: _~J~, _~--']~OaL~lY~ Date of Review: Holding times O, Ca~,~ ~'~ m Sample I.D. ~q~ L'/.I~'D , Date b ,oKl-~ -- m F~¢~ m m m m m m m m m I I I I I I I I I I DATA-VALIDATION - METALS Site Name :C~ ~)J~ ~ Reviewer: Associated Samples: Laboratory Name: Date of Review: II. Initial Calibration 1. Were all initial instrument calibrations performed? Coments: MO m 2. Were the initial calibration verification standards analyzed at the contract specified frequency? Coments: 3. Were the initial calibration results within the control limits listed m below? m m For ~ mercury: 80-120% of the true value For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value If "No", note analytes m m m I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Site Name:(~.~(~d L(~,,~d~FI Laboratory Name: Reviewer:~l~{)~ Date of Review: Associated Samples: ,/~7~- ! ~'~('~_ b/~ Y III. Continuing Calibration 1. Were the continuing calibration verification standards analyzed at the contract specified frequency? :m m m m m m l :m 2. Were the continuing calibration results within the control limits listed below? For ~ mercury: 80-120% of the true value For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value ~o If "No", note analytes m im I m m DATA VALIDATION - METALS Date of Review: IV. Blank Sumary A. Method Blanks 1. Was a method blank prepared and analyzed at the contract specified frequency? 2. Were all the analytes below the CRDL in the method blank? C°mments:~o~(~DtY(O0~ m m m m B. Calibration Blanks 1. Were all initial and continuing calibration blanks analyzed at the contract specified frequency? 2. Were all the analytes below the CRDL in all the calibration blanks? m m m I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Laboratory Name: Date of Review: V. Duplicate Analysis 1. Was a duplicate prepared and analyzed at the contract specified frequency? Comments: I I I I I I I each analyte? Comment~: Were control limits for the relative percent differences (RPD) met for No For sample values >5 times the CRDL, the RPD control limit is 520%. For sample values <5 times the CRDL, the RPD control limit is !CRDL. If sample results were outside of the control limits, all data associated with that duplicate sample should have been flagged with a "*". m DAfA VALIDATION - METALS Site Reviewer: Laboratory Date of Review: VI. Matrix Spike Analysis 1. Was a matrix spike prepared and analyzed at the contract specified frequency? Comments: DO ~ 2. Were the matrix spike recovereis within the contract specified control limits (75-125%)? ¥e$ Data should have been flagged with "N" for analytes out of control limits. If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of four or more, no flag is required. I I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Laboratory Name: Date of Review: VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Sumary 1. Was the ICP serial dilution analyzed at the contract specified frequen~ C°mmentsk~~ _~ No m m I m m m 2. Were the serial dilution differences within the contract specified limits of +~w-10%? Yes /~, Co?nts . OL~,L~A/~',~" 0;~; ................... 3. Was the ICP CRDL check standard analyzed at the contract specified frequency for the analytes required? Comments m m m I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Date of Review: VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Sumary (continued): 4. Was the ICP interference check sample analyzed at the contract specified frequency? Comments: m 5. Were the ICP interference check sample results within the control limit m m m m m m m I of +=w-20% of the mean value? (~) No If '"No", note analytes I I I I I I I I I DATA VALIDATION - METALS Date of Review: VIII. Laboratory Control Sample Analysis 1. Was a laboratory control frequency? sample analyzed at the contract required No Coments: m m m m m I m I I C~mment s /~1 Were the perecent recoveries within the control limits of 80-120% (except for Ag and Sb) for each analyte? No I I I I I I I I ! I DAtA VALIDATION - METALS Date of Review: IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis 1. Were duplicate injections performed for all analytes (except for the Method of Standard Addition [MSAI which requires single injections only)? Comments: No m m m m I 2. Where the concentrations were above the CRDL, did the two runs agree within 20% of the relative standard deviations for each analyte? If "No", note analytes and check to see if the analytes were run again. If readings are still outside the control limits, all data associated with that analysis should have been flagged with an "M". 3. Did the preparation blank analysis produce spike recoveries of 85-115%? Comments /'~-)9 ~~ 0~](~ m I m I I I I I ! I I I ! DATA VALIDATION - METALS Site Name: Rev i ewer: _~., _~. (~ O_ ~1~) ~.~ Laboratory Name: Date of Review: IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis (continued): 4. Were analysis (post digest) spikes performed on all concentration levels {2x CRDL)? Comments required samples and m m m m 5. For those samples whose initial spike recovery was less than 40%, was sample dilutin and respiking performed? Yes No Comments m ! 6. Was the MSA performed at the contract specified frequency and did it follow the contract specified criteria? Comments ~ ~ !' I~ Um.i. dvisoi'y Tabie~ Table i DATA VALiDATiON SIJIgg~RY (CONTRACTUAL COtlPLIANCE WITH 1989 NYSDEC ASP) Sample VUA Leachate Total Organic Number Matrix 601/607 8240 ~ Pest/PCB TCL Metals Parameters Carbon MW1DGW Water MW1SGW Water MW2DGW Water ~b~2SGW Water MW3DGW Water 1~¢3SGW Water I~W4DGW Water MW4SGW Water MW5OGW Water MW5DRE Water MWSSGW Water ~6DGW Water ~6DGWRE Water leW6SGW Water ~6SGW HS/MS0 Water HW7DGW Water PRV7OGWRE Water MW7SGW Water FBGW Distilled Water T8 7/25 Distilled Water Acce)table Acceptable* Acce)table Acceptable* Acce)table Acceptable Acce)table Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acce )table Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable Acce ~table Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable' Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable Acce ~tabl e Acce )tabl e* Acce ~table* Acce )tabl e* Acce ~tabl e* Acce ~tabl e* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable *See Table 2 S1541G ,mm m m m m m mm mm mmm m m mm m mm Imm mm imm m mmm T~le 1 (continued) DATA VALEOATEON SUtttRRY (CONTRACTUAL COflPLIANCE ~ITH 1989 NYSOEC ASP) VOA Sample 601/602 Number Hal~ri x 8010/8020 8240 BNA Pest/PCB TCL Metals MW6A Soll Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable Acceptable fed6A MS/MSD Soil Acceptable Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable* Acceptable FB01 Distilled Water Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable TB 7/15 0istilled Water Acceptable Acceptable .... Acceptable *See Table 2 S1541G m m m m m mmm m m mm m mm mm m m m m m mm m Table 2 DATA USER ADVISOR[ES FOR Tga OF SOUTHOLD LANOFILL PHASE !! RESULTS Sample Number Matrix Data Fraction Data User Advisory Comments I~IDGW Water VOA (8240) Continuing calibration criteria Oata not affected not met. BNA Continuing calibration criteria " not met. Method blank exceeds criteria. Pest./PCB 4,4-DDT exceeds linearity criteria on both columns. MW1SGW Water VOA (8240) Continuing calibration criteria Data not affected. not met. BNA Continuing calibration criteria not met. ~v~2DGW Water MW2SGW Water ~fd3DGW Water MW3SGW Water BNA BNA VOA (8240) BNA Pest./PCB VOA (8240) BNA Pest./PCB Continuing calibration criteria not met. Continuing calibration criteria not met. Continuing calibration criteria not met. Continuing calibration criteria not met. Method blank exceeds criteria. 4,4-00T exceeds linearity criteria on both columns. Continuing calibration criteria not met. Continuing calibration criteria not met. Method blank exceeds criteria. 4,4-00T exceeds linearity criteria on both columns. Data not affected. Data not affected. Data not affected. Data not affected. S1541G Table 2 (continued) DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFI'LL PHASE I! RESULTS Sample Number ~atrix M~4DGW Water I~W4SGW Water I~W5DGW Water Data Fraction BNA Pest./PCB VOA (8240) BNA Pest./PCB VOA (8240) BNA Pest./PCB M~5DGWRE Water BNA PRV5SGW Water VOA (8240) BNA Pest./PCB ~60GW Water VOA (8240) BNA Pest./PCB MW6DGWRE Water BNA Data User Adv;sorv Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Method blank exceeds criteria. 4,4-DDT exceeds linearity criteria on both columns. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Method blank exceeds criteria. 4,4-DDT exceeds linearity criteria on both columns. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Low surrogate % recovery. 4,4-00T exceeds linearity criteria on both columns. Sample re-extracted 12 days out of holding time. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration exceeds criteria. Method blank exceeds criteria. 4,4-DDT exceeds linearity criteria on both columns. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Poor surrogate recoveries. 4,4-DDT exceeds linearlty criteria on both columns. Sample re-extracted 12 days out of holding time. Coaments Data not affected. Data not affected. Data not affected. Possibility of false negatives. Sample was re-extracted. Data not affected. Oata usable. Results estimated. Data not affected. Data not affected. Possibility of false negatives. Sample was re-extracted. Data not affected. Data usable. Results estimated. S1541G m mm mm lmm mm mm mm ml mm mm mm m mm m m Table 2 (continued) DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDF)LL PHASE [! RESULTS Sam4)l e Number M~6SG~ MW6SGW MS/MSD Matrix Data Fraction Water VOA (8240) BNA Water VOA (8240) BNA Pest./PCBs MW7OGW Water BNA Pest./PCB MW7DGWRE Water BNA MW7SGW Water VOA (8240) BNA FBGW Distilled Water VOA (8240) BNA Pest./PCD TB 7/25 Distilled Water VOA (8240) MW6A Soil VOA BNA Data User Advisory Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria, matrix spike blank spike recoveries not within allowable limits. Matrix spike blank spike compounds percent recoveries fell outside allowable limits. Poor surrogate recoveries. 4,4-DDT exceeds linearity criteria on both columns. Sample re-extracted 12 days out of holding time. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Comments Data not affected. Data not affected. Possibility of false negatives. Sample was re-extracted. Oata not affected. Data usable. Results estimated. Data not affected. Continuing calibration standard Data not affected. exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration standard " and method blank exceed criteria. 4,4-DDT exceeds linearity criteria " for both columns. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration standard exceeds criteria. Continuing calibration standard and method blank exceed criteria. Data not affected. Acetone result usable but estimated. Data not affected. S1541G Sample Number MW6A MS/MSD FBgl Table 2 (continued) DATA USER ADVTSORZES FOR T(?dN OF SUUTHOLO LANDFILL PHASE I! RESULTS Matrix Data Fraction Data User Advlsorv Co~maents Soil V0A Continuing calibration standard Acetone result usable exceeds criteria, but estimated. DNA Matrix spike blank, method blank Data not affected. and continuing calibration exceeds criteria. Distilled Water BNA Continuing calibration standard and method blank exceed criteria. Data not affected. S1541G Appendix C / I I ! I I ! I I 1 1 ! I I ! I I I i $146~ AJPPEI~IX C SOiL GAS SUR.¥~ RF_,SLrLTS N 13+00 N 12+00 N lg+00 17+00 / ? N 2~+00 IFORMER MINING AREA ] ACTIVE LANDFILL AREA t I I \ \ N 8+0O N 7+~0 AREA N 8+00 N4+00 ELECTRIC LINES FORMER LAND, CLEARIN~ DEBRIS AND A N 1+1)0 N 0+00 WASTE OIL COLLECTION CENTER ~ STATION STORAGE ~ ~ ~ ~-~ I ~ , R ~osl~ L,UIt (LE,) :r' ~ ] ] USING G ECH 1939 M~ER , I' I 0 100 200 I DVirka TOWN .OF , CtYrCHOGUE L~DF[LL and ONITORINGRESULTS "';Ut'~)iBa"tilucci SOIL GAS M 'O~ULTtN~ ENO ~E~S ;. PERCENT EXPLOSIVE LIMII I RGURE NOJ E,'~ N 14d-OO N 11+00 N ~+00 N 2+00 N 0+00 STORAGE GARAGE ~ FORMER MINrNG i I , / ACTIVE I j m m X ~ I DEBRIS AND AUTOMOBLE I ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ / ~ ) ', OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 1 O0 200 (coUNTY ALL MEASUREMENTS IN PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) USING PHOTOVAC MICROTIP OR TIP dbDvirka and. . Bartducc~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS Syo~et, New York SOIL TOTAL TOWN OF SOUTHHOLD CUTCHOGUE LANDFILL GAS ORGANIC MONITORING COMPOUNDS RESULTS FIGURE NO. 1