Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-102.-5-26 (2)
ZONED k '%. OF DA ZONED ,¢ ZONED '~-40' }~ PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY PREPARED BY ROBERT MAVRIKANIS, L,S, DATED AUGUST 2008 TOWN OF SOUTNOLD STANDARD NOTES: 1. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR (785-1560) AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF ANY WORK. WORK PERFORMED WIT/tOUT INSPECTIQN SHALL GE CERTIFIED TO THE ENGINEER'S SATISFACTION AT APPLICANT'S D(PENSE, 2. COORDINATE AND COMPLETE ALL UTILITY RELOCATIONS. REVISION DATE N 40. REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 3 REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS ~ REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENTS REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS DRWN APPR REVISION 5/11110 ~/~/10 12/5/09 ~/2o/og DATE KEY PLAN N.T.S. ZONED '~0" ow Z/~E LAND OWNER/APPUCANT; TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 2 + 8 - 10 STALLS BOARD NOTB: The approved site dev~lopmeat plan d'~ll b a ~fiod of t~e (3) ye~ ~om ~ ~ of a~v~ u , DRAWING SCHEDULE BP1- PROPOSED SInE PLAN §P2- DEMOLllION/EXIgTING BIlE PLAN BP3- PROPOSED GRADING/DRAINAGE pLAN BP4-- PROPOSED LANOSCAPE PLAN BPS- EXISTING LIGHTING A SIGNAGE PLAN BP6- SiTE DETAILS BP7- TOWN CAR QUE/TRUCK PLAN LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (651) 751-6455 WILLIAM J. LAHTI NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 068377 NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE NO. 37551 CONNECTICUT P,E. LICENSE NO, 25522 VIRGINIA P.E, LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 031093 MASSACHUSETTS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. 08-045 PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWING DWG# REV 10/20/08 PROP ALIGNMENT PLAN BP-1 4 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ¸'4 / / / / / ~ */ ¢ /~'~ ~~ zz~ /~ //~ x~ / X l/ /: I / / ~ ~ --, ....... . ....... ............. ..... . .......,~,~..... ...... .... ... ~ ~ ........ ~ .~.-.:- -.=.--.I ~ ~-~,~ ,~,'~ . --':-.. ~~ ~ ~"~ - ~, r-~ ~o,:~ ~) MAIN ~'~ ~' ~'~~ ~OAD _ ~ ~s PROPOSED SITE DEMOLITION PLAN APPROVED BY i'"'"""i I'"'"'"1 I P~NNIN~ BOARD ~ ~ TO~N O~ ~OUTHO[~ LAHTI ENGINE:RING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. '' "'' , 20~ HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 /~NY BROOK, NY 11790 MAY '' -- (651) 751-6~33 ~ N~ YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 06B577 NEW JERS~ P.E. LICENSE NO. 57351 CONNECTICUT P,E. LICENSE NO. 23522 ..... VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 0~1658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E, LICENSE NO. 051095 IT IS THE RESPONSlBILI~ OE THE CONT~OTOR TO R~I~ AEE D~WINGS AND WILLIAM ~. ~HTI MASSACHUSE~S P.E. LIgENSE NO. ~6~20 RESTIVE TO THE SPECIFICA~ONS, SITE CONDITIONS OR ~PUCABE COBES, IT IS THE gONT~TOR'S RESPONSlBI~ TO NOTI~ THE PR~ECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN 5 R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 3/3/10 RC WL BLK 5 CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION w.mN~. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUC~ON FOR RESOLUTION Or THE ISSUE. BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE VALERO S~RVICB STATION F~LURE BY THE CO~OTOR TO NOTI~ THE PR~EGT ENGINEER SHALL OONSTIT~E 2 R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION ~ NYSDOT COMMENTS 12/5/09 RC WL LOT 26 ACCEPTANCE OF FU~ RESPONSIBIU~ 8Y TH~ O0.T~CTO. TO O0.~L~E THE SCOPE 28975 ROUTE25 REGUbTIoNsOF WORK AS ANB~[~NE~COO[s.BY THE~TERA~ONDRAWINGSoF ANDTHESEmN BOgUMENTs.FUE CO~PLIANOEuNLESSWITHM~ELOC~By A 1 R~ISED PER TOWN P~NNING COMMENTS ]/20/09 RC WL JOB NO. DATE DRAWING DWG~ n~ CUTCHOGU E, NY 11955 UCENSEO PROP., IS A vmo~oN OF SECTIO~ 7209 OF ~lE STATE EDU~nON ~W. NO. R~tSION DATE DRWN APPR NO. R~ISION DATE DRWN APPR 08-045 10/20/08 SITE DEMOLITION P~N SP-2 4 DRAINAGE POOL SCHEDULE PO0~ )]A.(FOI GRADE ELEV. RING OEPIH(FT] CASI1NG ELP1 10 31.97 I GRAI1E DRAINAGE CALCULAllONS (BASED ON 2' RAINFALL PER TOWN CODE) ZONE 3:F'OO!5 PLP2 2,155 SF X 0.167' - 360 CU FT / (68.38 CU FT/1 FT 6F 10' DIA. POOL) = 5,3' RING HGT NO. /_ ZONED L,4/VD /V/F OF 0,4 WD ~ ~ ,4My D ZON£D "HB~ ' dLZT~NY I MAIN ROAD "R_ 4 0' LEGEND REVISION DATE PROPOSED GRADE/DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 11111111111 IIIIlllllll I ND MDDIFICATIDNS DF THE EXISTING GRADING OR SITE STDRMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM ARE PROPOSED N 40. REV PER TOWN pLANNiNG BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 5 REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS ~ REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS REVISION DRWN APPR COMMENT5 5/11/10 RC WL 513110 J RC j WLI ~2/8/o~I ~G I WL I ~/2o/og RC J WE J DATE DRWN APPR DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. 08-043 APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOU'fHOLD 3,,¢ ? LAHTI CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 · (651) 751-6455 WILLIAM d. LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL MAY 3 2010 NEW YORK P,E. LICENSE NO. 068577 NEW JERSEY P,E, LICENSE NO. 57.351 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 23322 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 051095 MASSACHUSETTS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWING 10/20/08 SITE GRADE PLAN DWG~ REV SP-3 4 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 ///~~1/ II I~ I ZONED '~B ' ~- . '% .':..:.:' Z:.': '. :. .".. ".~ : ' - '. :.'":":".;" ' ~' " :"'-'.!''i-v: .' ' ' ':'~'-." ' . ',..'.,: ':. .".. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ~SOAPE S~ALE: ~" = 20'-0" TOTAL PROPOSED ~DSCAPING : 4.690 SF (25.~) P~NNING BOARD DATE LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. =~ 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 , ~ ~EW ro~x P,E, UeE~SE NO, 0~ (~ ~~ /~ -- N~ JERS~ P.E. LICENSE NO. ~7~51 ~ VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO, 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 051093 WILLIAM J. ~HTI MASSACHUSEIIS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46~20 IT IS THE RESPONSIBILI~ OF THE CON~CTOR TO R~I~ A~ DRAWINGS AND DIST 1000 PROJECT: SITE: CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONVICT WI~ THE DOCUMENTS ~ R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 5/11/10 RC WL SECT 102 ~z~,vz m m~ s,~c,nc*~o,s, s~ co~omo,s o~ *,,uc~,,_~ coo~s. , ,s m~ CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION CONT~CTOR'S RESPONSIBILI~ TO NOTI~ THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD tN 3 R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 3/5/10 RC WL 8LK 5 VALERO SgRVICg STATION ~,m~;. ~,,o, mm, s~*,~ o, co,smuc~,o. ,o, ,~so,u~,o, o, ~,, ,ssu[ BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE F~LURE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTI~ THE PR~ECT ENGINEER S~LL CONSTITUTE 2 R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENT~ 12/5/09 RC WL LOT 26 *~o~A~ or ~u~ ,~sPo. S,,,.~ ,~ m~ ~o,~o~o, ro ~o~ T.~ s~o,~ 28975 ROUTE 25 RKGU~oNsOF WORK ~ ANDOEFINEDcOOES.BY THEALTE~TiOND~WlNGSoF ANDTHEsEIN OOOUMENIs,FULL COMPU~CEUN~SsWITH~ELOCALBy A 1 REVISED PER TOWN P~NNING COMMENTS /20/09 RC WL dOB NO. DATE DRAWING DWG~ REV CUTCHOGUE. NY 11955 LICENSE~ PROF., IS A VIO~TION OF SECTION 7~09 OF THE STATg EDUCTION ~W. NO. REVISION DATE DRWN APPR NO. R~ISlON DATE DRWN APPR 08-045 ~o/2o/o~ ~NDSCAPE P~N SP-4 UGHTING: EXISTING/PROPOSED SIGN ~ LIOHT PLAN ~ u~ms- "LS~ C.~LLE.~E~" WXTU~E W~T. ~OOW .~ P~ESSU~E SO~U~ U~UT SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" MOUNTED ON A 15 ~ HIGH POLE souRa~. (~) F~XTUR~S ~T~ ~0 LmS ~ (~) F~XTUR~S W~TH mO LEOS ~,_~. ~ I I I I I u~m~c ~U~LLY CO~TROL[E~ W~ ~ P~OTOa~LL. TH~ S~T~ ~S OPE~ l~ ~OURS I LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL , CONSULTING, P.C. ~"' 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 CANOPY SIGN (ON ~ST FACE OF CANOPY): ~ ~, (651) 751-64~ PRICE SIGN - WHITE ILLUMINATED L~ERS WITH T~L BACKGROUND; 5'-0" HIGH X 9'-8" = 29 SF N~ YORK P.E, LICENSE NO. 068~77 NEW JERS~ P.E. LICENSE NO. 57~51 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 25322 VIRGINIA P,E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P,E. LICENSE, NO. 031093 WILLIAM d. ~HTI MASSACHUSEIIS P.E. LICENSE NO, 46420 SPECIFI~TIONS ~SOC~TED WffH THIS PR~ECT PRIOR TO THE INI~IAqON OF DIST 1000 PROJECT: SITE: CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THE CON~CTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH ]HE DOCUMEN~ ~ R~ PER TOWN P~NNtNG BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 5/11/10 RC WL SECT 102 .~w to ~. s.m.~c~o.s, s~. co.~mo.s o. e.uc~ co~s. ~ ~s ~.~ CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION CON~TOR'S RESPONSI,ILI~ TO NOTI~ THE PR~ECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN 3 R~ PeR TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 3/5/10 RC WL BLK 5 VA~O WRm.O. PRIOR TO THE ~ART OF CONSTRUC~O" FOR RESOLUTION OF ~E ISSUE. BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE F~LURE BY THE CONT~CTOR TO NOTI~ THE PR~ECT ENGINEER SHALL OONSTIT~E 2 R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION A NYSDOT COMMENTS 12/5/09 RC WL LOT 26 OF WORK AS DEFINED BY ~E DRAWINGS ~O IN ~ COMPLIANCE WITH LO~ 1 R~ISEO PER TOWN P~NNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 RC WL JOB NO, DATE DRAWING DWG~ R~ LIOENSED PROF,, IS A VIO~ON OF SEC~ON 7209 OF ~E STATE EDUCA~ON ~W. NO, REVISION DATE DRWN APPR NO. R~ISlON DATE DRWN APPR 08-045 ~o/2o/o~ LIGHTINO ~ SIGN P~N SD-5 SHRUB BED TOPSOIL SHRUBS (2)- a/4 "REINFORCED RUBBER DOUBLE STRAND #12I WIRE (IWISTED) CEDAR STAKE 5" MULCH LOOSEN BURLAP AROUND TRUNK TOPSOIL MIX 25~ PE~T MOSS DAGWOOOS AND (~/EROREENS ONLY) MINOR TREES WIRE (TWISTED) I (2)- 5/4 ' REINEORCED RUBBER BO B' LONG CEOAR STAKE · 2" TO 3" MIN CALIPER I (VARIES) B" ABOVE OROUND 6" LAYER Of TOPSOIL LOOSEN BURLAP AROUND TRUNK J' TOPSOIL (25X MANURE) MIN. MAJOR STREET TREES PLANTING DETAILS SCALE ...................... N.T.S. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILID( OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIPICATIONS ASSOCIATED WII~I THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION~ SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE FO THE SPECIFICATIONS, SITE CONDITIONS OR APPUCABLE CODES, IT IS THE CONI~ACTOR'S RESPONSIBILII~' TO NOTIFY THE PROdECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN WRITING. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUE. FAILURF BY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF FULL RESPONSIRIUI~' BY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPI_~IE THE SCOPE NO. L~S~"'~"N O PA_R. KING sLC~. ANYTIME SIGN ~ ~.~ "HANDICAPPED PARKING ONLY" SIGN WIDE SLUE PAINTED STRIPES, TYPICAL THROUGHOUT 4" WIDE BLUE PAINTED ON 45' ANGLE, 24" O.C. TYPICAL PARKING 8'--0" HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL N.T.S. CONCRETE FILLED S~EL PIPE BOLLARD STEEL SION POST 12" x 12" CONC, FTG, SIGN ~'HANDICAPPED PARKING PERMIT REQUIRED & II DETAIL CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE BOLLARD STEEL SIGN POST 12" x 12" x CONC. FTG. NO PARKING ANYTIME (1) PER NEW DENERAL NOTES SION DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. H/C STALL (1) PER NEW H/C STRIPED STALL 1. EXISTING SITE PLAN INFORMATION BASED ON SURVEY. ASPHALT PAVEMENT/GRASS- SEE SITE PLAN HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME & LID- REFER / TO SCHEDULE (CAMPBELL FOUNDRY OR APPR EQUAL) I PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE COLLAR PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE DOME iNLET PIPE WHERE APPL.~- REINFORCED LEACHING POOL COMPACTED BANKRUN 18" FOR 10' DIA, 10' DIAMETER GRADE RINGS WITH~1~ FILTER FABRIC COMPACTED BANKRUN 3'--0" MIN. GROUNDWATER STORM SCALE WATER LEACHING POOL N.T.S. 1 I/2= WEARING COURSE-ITEM 51F 5 1/2" DENSE BINDER COURSE 6" BASE COURSE, GRAVEL, I CRUSHED STONE-ITEM 201 PRIME COAT TO SEA[ SASE AND BOND PARTICLES J REINFORCED CONCRETE CURBING TO BE 18" DEEPC1.5" RADIUS AT EXPOSED TOP EDGE) 6" REVEAL CONTINUOUS OYP FOR 2) SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO MIN. 95~ STD. PROCTOR DENSITY SECT. PARKING FLD. IMPROVEMENTS SCALE .................................................. N.T.S. PAVEMENT/CURB NDTES~ 1. CBNCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BF 4,000 PSI AT RB DAYS WITH A MAXIMUM DF 6Z AIR ENTRAINMENT, 2, EXPANS[DN JDINTS SHALL BE PLACEB IN THE CURB AT A MAXIMUM DF 16 FODT INTERVALS, 3. ASPHALT PAVEMENT SHALL DE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 400 'BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS' OF THE 'STANBARO SPECIFICATIONS' MANUAL AS PUBLISHEB BY THE DFFICE DF ENGINEERING DF THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT DF TRANSPDRTAION, THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, USE DF A 10 TON STEEL WHEEL ROLLER FOR PROOF ROLLING AND COMPACTION, PRDDF ROLLING DF THE SUBDRADE UNDER THE PROPOSED PAVED AREA, SMODTH ROLLING DF THE PAVEMENT AT A MAXIMUM DF 4 MILES PER HOUR, AND PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT DNLY WHEN SURFACE TEMPERATURES EXCEED 45 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT, 4, PAVEMENT SHALL MDT RE PLACED WHEN THE SUBGRADE DR BASE MATERIAL I~ WET DR FROZEN, ALL DEFICIENT AREAS IDENTIFIED BY PROOF ROLLING DR OTHER MEANS SHALL BE 9EMEBIEO TB PROVIDE A FIRM, SUITABLE BASE AND RE-ROLLED TD DEMONSTRATE THAT IT HAS BEEN SATISFACTORILY REPAIRED, REVISION DATE REV PER DRWN APPR NO. 3 REV PER REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 5/11/10 TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 3/3/10 12/5/09 TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENTS REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE DIST SECT BLK LOT JOB APPROVED BY PLANNING BOA,~D ToWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL, CONSULTING, P.C. ' ' MAY 13 20i0 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (631) 751-6~53 , , NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 068377 NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE NO. 37351 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 23522 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 051093 MASSACHUSETTS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 WILLIAM J. LAHTI 1000 102 5 26 NO. 08-043 PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWING lO/2O/OS SITE DETAILS DWG# REV SP-6 4 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 · · · · · · & · ~PDTTER RECHMMENDED FLAG TREE MIN. 100 FT FRaM FLAGGER MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC PLAN (PER TAST-G1UH) REVISION DATE GENERAL NOTESI ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES MUST CONFORM WITH THE NATIONAL MUTCD WITH NEW YORK STATE SUPPLEMENT, 2, ALL LANES MUST DE OPEN TO TRAFFIC BEFORE I0 A,M, AND AFTER 3 P,M, 3, NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED DN WEEKENDS DR HOLIDAYS, 4, WHEN PLACING OR RETRIEVING TRAFFIC CONTRUL DEVICES, CONTRACTOR IS TO UTILIZE THE TRAFFIC CONTROL SCHEME FOR SLOWLY MOVING WORK AREAS~ 5, WHEN LANE CLOSURE IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE TRAFFIC CONTROL SCHEME FOR SNORT DURATION WORK AREAS, 6, NIGHTTIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT DE PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR, N/~- 0~- DW VID H. ~ ,~My D ZONED "/dB" ' xiZS£N/- I ZONED "HB" $ \ n: t~ F1 % ZONED TOWN REQUIRED VEHICLE QUE & TRUCK PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" N 40. REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 3 REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS ~ REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENT.( REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS )RWN APPR REVISION 5/11/~0 3/3/10 1~/5/09 1/20/09 DATE LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL WILLIAM d. LAHTI CONSULTING ' , P.C. , , MAY 13 20]0 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 ' STONY BROOK, NY 11790 - [ j i iI NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 068577 N~ JERS~ P.E. LICENSE NO. 37351 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 25522 VIRGINIA P,E. LICENSE NO. 041658 0~1093 46420 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. MASSACHUSb~S P.E. LICENSE NO. DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. 08-045 PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWING lO/2O/O8 VEHICLE QUE PLAN DWC# REV SP-7 4 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUIE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 ~ ~ EXIS'RNG CONCRE~E BLOCK WALLS TO EXIS~ND 36"W X 6'-El= SOLID STEEL DOOR : :i ~'/////'////////////////////////////////////////'/.~/ REMAIN EXlSllNC NON-LOAO SEARING g~. BD PAR~ON ~ / EXIS~NG I~UMINA~D EXIT SIGN O~R DOOR / . ~ WALL TO REMAIN ~ / / UTILITY RM .~ ~PROPO~ NON-LOAD BEARING G~. BD 6 / '.=.'.-.'.-.v.-~ v.'.-.=.-.v.=.-.-;:: ~ ~E X G~. BD ON BO~ SIDES ~IOAL) ~/////////////~X (//~/////////~' ~/ ~////////////////~/////////////////////////// ~ / ~ ~P.OPOSE~ ~.'w x .'-.' boo..~ ~ UTILITY RM~ / / .... ~/ PRIVACY LOCKSET ~D CLOSER ~ / , c __; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-o- ~..~os~ ~'w x o'-~' sou. ooo..m T X -- ' '" CUM // ~ADA ~ PROPO~D NON-LOAD~ , EXIS~NO NON--LOAD SEARING GYP. BP ~ Z I, 7'--~ I. ~,~ WALL TO t/RESTROOM X~ ~ PAR~ONBEARING G~.WA~BD :::~ - ~ PAR~ON WALL TO REMAIN ~ ~ ~==:===~ (2) E~S~NG 3O'W D~S TO B~ J~ ~FOR R SE~ ICE TO - ~ I RESTROOM /~ EXIS~NO NON--LOAD BEARING O~. BD ' -% ~ ~ ~.,...v......,v....j '-1" ~v.......v.....:v~.L. ~_ FORMER DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED ~ ~ : ~: ~ I I ', :-' gug~ STORE / I L ~ I. ATTENDANT'S ATTENDANT'S J J EXISTING PAIN~D G~. BD WA~ ON INSIDE AREA AREA J J ~ FACE OF CONCRE~ BLOCX TO RE~A~N ,, ij~////~i j~~ ATTENDANT'S ATTENDANT'B EXIS~NG I~UMINAmD EXIT Dian ~-.- / AREA AREA ~ J ~m EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXmRES , STOREFRONT GLAZING TO REMAIN IJ~////~l I -- ~//// F LO0 R P LAN- P R OP OS E D~x,~,,~ 2, HigH KNEE WALL WAS O~RHEAD GARAGE DOOR OPXNING BRICK ~NBER FACADE. ACCORDING TO / ~,~,o,o~ FLOOR PLAN- DEMOLITION ~ m CEILING- PAINTED GYPSUM BOARD O 11'-11" (EXCEPT UTIM~ RM IS UNFINISHED) / RESTROOM :: ~ BUILDING NOTES- J~, /;~ ~ :: ~ ':' ER ~ / 1. THE PROPOSED BUILDING MODIFICA~ON IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. AS SUCH, ~E ALTERA~ON ~, MUST COMPLY ~TH CHAP~R ~ OF THE "EXIS~NG BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STA~", 2007 VERSION (AS PER SECTION 306.2). / / 3. NEW OCCUPANCY JS CLASSIFIED AS GROUP M WI~ HAZARD CA'GORY · / P~NNiNG BOARD ~,, i', , ~__ . , . ~. /~' ,/. / . ,.. , .' '~, . . NT' I~ t° , gA~TL ENGiNEERiNG ~ CONSUgTING, P.C. ~_ * HATCHED FLOOR AREA REPRESENTS CONVENIENCE STORE ~/~0~ 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 2~2 ~' - RETAIL, STORAGE AND COUNTER AREA. ~ ~ ~X. STONY BROOK, NY 11790 CONVENIENCE STORE AREA IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF ~-~- NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 068~77 800 SQUARE FEET PER LOCAL LAW NO. 14 OF 2009. ~~~ NEW JERS~ P.E. LICENSE NO. 37~51 ~ CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 23~22 FLOOR PLAN- FIXTURES NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 051093 SCALE: 1/4" =1'~0" WILLIAM J. ~HTI MASSACHUS~S P.E. LICENSE NO. 46~20 ~ ~s mE RESPONSIBIU~ OF mE CONmAC~OR TO ~1~ A~ D~WINGS AND DIST 1000 PROJECT: SITE: SPECIFICA~ONS ~SOC~TED wl~ THIS PROaECT PRIOR TO mE INI~A~ON OF CONSTRUCTION SHOULD THE CON~CTOR FIND A CONFUCT Wire ~HE DOCUMENTS ~ R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 5/11/10 RC WL SECT 102 RESTIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, SITE CONDITIONS OR ~PLICABLE CODES, IT IS THE CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION .~.T~.TO.'~ ..~.o.~,~,.~ TO .0~,~ ~....0~ ~..,.... O..~0.~ ,. 3 ~ ~. TOWN P~NN~N~ ~ WORX SESS,ON COMMENTS ~/~/~0 ~C WL BLX 5 VAgERO SgRWCg STATION WRiTINg, PRIOR TO THE ST~T OF CON,RUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF ~E ISSUE. LOT 26 BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE FAILURE BY ~E CONT~CTOR TO NOT~ THE PROJ~CT ~GINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE 2 R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION A NYSDOT COMMENT~ 12/5/09 RC WL 28975 ROUTE 25 OF WORN AS D[~NED BY THE D~WINGS AND IN FULL COMPUANC~ WITH LO~ 1 R~ISED PER TOWN P~NNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 RC WL dOB NO. DATE DRAWING DWG~ R~ CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 UOENSED PROF., IS A VIO~TION OF SEC~ON 7209 OF THE STATE EDUCATION ~W. NO. REVISION DATE DRWN APPR NO. R~ISION DATE DRWN APPR 08-043 10/20/08 STORE FLOOR PLAN A-1 EXlSllNC NON-LOAD / ...................... BE^RING BO P^R ,ON / EXIB NG I"-GMINA O EX. SIGN O00R ~/////////////~ / ~////////////////~/////////////////////////// , ,, OFFICE EXIS~NO PAINED CML ~ RESTROOM ,, EXIS~NG NON--LOAD BEARING ~. BD EX,S~NG PAINED GYP. BD WALL ON INSIDE FACE iOF CONCRETE BLOCK TO REMAI~ ATTENDANT'S ATTENDANT'S EXIS~NG I~UMINA~D EXIT SlaN AREA AREA ~ J ~ E~ERGENCY LmHT FIX~RES 't~////~' ~ ~//// PROPOSED 23"X 152" SANDBLASTED SIGN MOUNTED TO FACADE (LITE CEDAR TONE BACKGROUND) GOOSENECK LIGHT FIXTURE (TYP FOR 3) (COLOR: BEIGE) EXISTING ALUMINUM CAP FLASHING (COLOR: LIGHT BROWN) EXISTING ALUMINUM CAP FLASHING (COLOR: LIGHT BROWN) STOREFRONT GLAZING TO REMAIN (COLOR. BRUSHEO ALUMINUM) ExISrlNG 2' HIGH KNEE WALL WAS RAISED TO zi2" AFF BY INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE BLOCK AND BRICK VENEER FACADE (COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS IVORY) -- EXIS~NO STOREFRONT AND 6'W X DOUBLE GLASS DOOR UNIT IN FORMER OVERNEAD GARAGE DOOR OPENING FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH FACE) SCALE : 1/4" =1'-0" EXIS~NG SHINGLED MANSARD ROOF (COLOR: MAIEC'S NANTUCKET LIGHT BIEGE) -- TRIM (COLOR: WHITE) VENEER (COLOR: SHERW1N WILUAMS IVORY) DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED Wl/H METAL STUD INSULATED WALL WIIH BRICK VENEER FACADE. ACCORDING TO PREVIOUS PLANS, TRENCH FOOTING lb" X WAS INSTALLED BEFORE WALl FILL WAS INSTALLED. GRADE EXIS~NG SHINGLED MANSARD ROOF (COLOR: MAIEC'S NANTUCKET LIGHT BIEGE) -- TRIM (COLOR: WHITE) STOREFRONT GLAZING TO REMAIN (COLOR: BRUSHED ALUMINUM) GRADE BRICK VENEER (COLOR: BHERWIN WILLIAMS IVORY) FORMER RESTROOM DOOR OPENINGS NOW SEALED WITH METAL STUD INSULATED WALL WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE. LEFT SIDE ELEVATION (WEST FACE) SCALE : 1/4" =1'--0' IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVI~V ALL DRAWINGS AND NO. SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH TRIS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF CONSIRUCTION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFUCT WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, SII~ CONDITIONS OR APPLICABLE CODES, IT iS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIRIUI'¢ TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD tN WRITING, PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLURON OF THE ISSUE FAILURE DY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE ACCEPFANCE OF FULl RESPONSIBILII~ BY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE THE SCOPE OF WORK AS DEFINED BY THE DRAWINGS AND IN FULl COMPUANCE WITH LOCAl REGULATIONS AND CODES. ALTERATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS, UNLESS MADE DY A UCENSED PROF, IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF IllE STATE EDUCATION LAW. REVISION DATE DRWN APPR NO. 5 REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 5/11/10 PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 3/.3/10 12/5/09 PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENTS REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF $OUTHOLD DIST SECT BLK LOT JOB 1000 102 5 26 NO. 08-045 PROJECT: LAHTI CONSULTING, P.C. CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DWG# REV A2 4 ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (651) 751-6433 NEW YORK P.E. NEW JERSEY P.E. CONNECTICUT P.E. VIRGINIA P.E. NORTH CAROLINA P,E. MASSACHUSb) IS P.E. DATE DRAWING lO/2O/O8 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LICENSE NO. 068577 LICENSE NO. 57551 LICENSE NO, 23322 LICENSE NO. 041658 LICENSE NO. 031093 LICENSE NO. 46420 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 ~' / / :/ / ~/ (\\\\\\ n n // / / ;/ C\\\\\\ APPROVED BY PLANNIi~G BOARD TOWN OF, SOUTHOLD VALERO CUTCHOGUE FIGURE B TANKER TRUCK & PASSENGER CAR TURNING PATHS 03/08/10 1' = 40' / , / / / / m ( \\\\\\ ,. t ( \ \ \\\\ ASSOCIATES, VALERO CUTCHOGUE FIGURE A TANKER TRUCK TURNING PATH PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOI/ Chair Tk~r~T,I~,TA.~[ J. CREMERS KENNETH L EDWARDS DONALD J. WILCENSKI JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hsll Annex · 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June 15, 2010 Mr. William Lahti, PE c/o Lahti Engineering 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Re: Approval: Proposed Site Plan for the Valero Service Station Located at 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Zoning District: HB Dear Mr. Lahti: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, June 14, 2010: WHEREAS, the application is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for a site plan was submitted on October 31, 2009, including the site plan prepared by William Joseph Lahti, P.E., dated October 20, 2010; and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board accepted the application for review; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2009, the Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code {}280-131 C., distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments, and the following agencies responded: Town Engineer, Architectural Review Committee, Southold Town Transportation Commission and Cutchogue Fire Commissioners, and NYS DOT; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies referenced above were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and Valero PaRe Two June 15, 2010 WHEREAS, on February 12, 2009, the Planning Board referred the application to the Suffolk County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 2009, the Suffolk County Planning Commission responded that the proposed action was disapproved for the following reasons: "The proposal is an unwarranted over intensification of use of the premises. The proposal would tend to diminish the safety and carrying capacity of NYS Route 25. The site plan design of the proposed multi use is a poor configuration."; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2009, the applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Assessment in connection with the site plan that concluded that the addition of another fuel pump island and the conversion of the automotive service use to a convenience store will not adversely affect the site or roadway operations; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 2010, the Planning Board distributed the traffic analysis to the Transportation Commission and they. maintained their original position whereas their comments have been reviewed and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on March 3, 2010, a public hearing was held and closed; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2010 the Southold Town Planning Board, found that the mitigation proposed by the applicant was sufficient, and agreed to over-ride the Suffolk County Planning Commission action based on the following: 1. The SCPC did not have the traffic study that concluded that the new fuel pump island and the conversion of the service station to a convenience store would not adversely affect the site or roadway operations. 2. The NYSDOT has reviewed the site plan and comments have been incorporated into the site plan that includes access management techniques to the site design. 3. The site plan has been reviewed by the both the Town Engineer and Transportation Committee whereas site design, traffic and safety have been commented on and incorporated into the overall site design. 4. Although the site design is not ideal, the location of the building and the fuel pump island exists. 5. The addition of a second fuel pump island has been reviewed for turning radius and queuing of cars and deemed adequate. 6. The applicant is proposing external hose retractors for the fuel pumps and will have the ability to fuel vehicles on either side of the pump if necessary. 7. Directional arrows have been added to the site plan to aid in safe site circulation; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and certified that the diesel pump and the conversion of the automotive service use to a convenience store is a permitted use in this Business Zoning District; therefore be it Valero Pa.qe Three June 15, 2010 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has reviewed the proposed action under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and determined that the action is consistent as outlined in the memo, dated March 23, 2009, prepared by the LWRP Coordinator; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby over-rides the Suffolk County Planning disapproval; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval with Conditions to the site plan entitled "Valero Service Station" prepared by William Joseph Lahti, P.E., dated October 20, 2010 and last revised on May 11, 2010, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the site plan packet that includes the following drawings: · SP-01 Prop Alignment Plan · SP-02 Site Demo Plan · SP-03 Site Grade Plan · SP-04 Landscape Plan · SP-05 Lighting and Sign Plan · SP-06 Site Details · A-01 Store Floor Plan · A-02 Exterior Elevations · Figure B Truck & Pass Car turning Paths Dunn Engineering dated 3/08/10 and with the following conditions: 1. All signs and lighting are part of the approved site plan and any changes must be approved by the Planning Board in an amended site plan; and 2. There will be no t.v. monitors or screens displayed on the pumps; and ,3. Retractable extension hoses on the gas pumps are required to facilitate site circulation and mitigation to concerns about site congestion and safety, and any change to this must be approved by the Planning Board in an amended site plan. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. Valero Page Four June 15,2010 Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan, and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. A copy of the approved site plan enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encls. cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission Building Inspector w/map Town Engineer w/map PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI January 10,2012 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Valero Service Station Located at 28975 NYS Rt. 25, n/e corner of Depot Lane & NYS Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Zoning District: HB Dear Ms. Moore: The Planning Board, at their January 9, 2012 Work Session, found that the requirements listed in the letter, dated July 12, 2011, specifically: the removal of portable signs, re-painting of traffic flow arrows and striping, and appropriate drainage installation according to the as-built site plan have been completed based on the site inspection made December 22,2011 and the site is now in conformance with the approved site plan. This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies; Planning Board approval is required prior to any significant changes to the site. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman CC; Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, January 9, 2012 2:30 p.m. Executive Board Room, Town Hall Annex 2:30 p.m. Applications Description: The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless communication facility having interior mounted antennas within an existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened : from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing chu[ch b~ d ng ona0 91:ac[e site !0cated in the R-40 Zoning District. Status F naPendng inspection Act on Rev ew draft Fna nspection Letter. Attach.ments: Draft Letter Location: 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a 1,206 s.f. convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Status: ~. Ein. a! pending !nspect!0n Act on i Rev ew draft Final Inspection Letter. Attachments: ~' Draft Letter Patio L0cat!0n: n/s/o Nys Bou~e25 ! !21' e/o Sound Road in.G~eenport ~,s~[!p~!on.; This proposal is to add ~ pati° t° the B[ecknock Ha!! si~e, Status: Pre-submission .......... Action: Review proposal to determine whether an amended site plan application Attachments: Draft Plan Project name: Currie, Lawrence ~¥M~i, 1 := 19.2 Location: . Soundview Avenue, +/- 101.85 feet north east of Kenn~i~ . Southold SCTM~1000-59-6-19.2 to SCTM~s 1000-59-6-18.1 and 19.1, eliminating ~9 2.a~d n~[~a~ ~g the ~ rema n ng 0tS by approx. 0,2 ac[es: ~cti98; Attachments; J ~taff RePg~ Plannin~Board Site Inspec~on Record Attending: Tax Map# Purpose of site visit: MS4 Reporting Illicit discharge on or near site? If Yes, briefly describe: (provide copy of this report to Town Stormwater Manager) PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 November 28, 2011 Attn: Martin Sidor, Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: Valero Service Station 28975 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY SCTM: 1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Sidor and Board Members: My client advised that he has completed the work at the premises per your letter of July 12,2011. Enclosed please find two (2) original Engineer Certifications regarding the drainage. hereby request a Certificate of Occupancy compliance inspection of the premises. Please advise me of the date of the inspection. My client would like to be present for same. PCM/mr cc by fax: If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Mike Verity, Southold Town Building Dept. DANIEL FALASCO, P.I , P.C. 2150 SMITHTOWN AVENUE, SUITE 5 RONKONKOMA, NEW YORK 11779 VOICE (516) 317-7209 FAX (631) 467-7840 November 19, 2011 Town of Southold Building Department 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Building Inspector Re: 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue, New York Gentlemen: Please be advised on Monday October 31,2011, this office provided inspection of the installation of the drainage structure labeled PLP2 on the attached As-Built drawing. In addition we witnessed the installation of the drainage pipe connecting ELP1 and ELP2. This office also took measurements of the other, previously installed, drainage structures at the site. The results of the measurements as well as a comparison of the proposed dimensions revealed insufficient capacity at PLP1 (2- 4'diam. x 6' deep). We advised the owner and on November 18, 2011 an additional structure, labeled PLP1C was installed (8' diam. x 8' deep). The results of all As-Built dimensions are as indicated on the attached drawing. Please be advised that the proposed structure PLP1 was constructed as three (3) structures that are now labeled PLP1A, PLP1B and PLP1C. Please be further advised that the capacity of the three (3) installed structures exceeds the capacity of the one proposed structure. Based on the field inspection and measurements of the drainage structures as described above, it is determined that the construction activities were performed in accordance with or exceeded the design plans. If you should have any questions, please give me a call. y yours, Daniel Falasco, P.E. AS-BUILT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTED N39'42' IO"E PLPlC Oo 173.74-' ELP1 10'¢ x 1' DEEP 10'¢ x 1' DEEP /ooo ' ELP2 10'¢ x 10' DEEP 10'¢ x 10' DEEP 6' DEEP 0'6' DEEP DEEP 10'¢ xX O' DEEP ~ ELP3 10'¢x 10'¢ 16, ELP4 10'¢x 16, PLP1A 10'¢x DEEP 4?¢ x6' DEEP PLP1B 4'¢x DEEP I PLP1C 8'¢ x 8' DEEP I PLP2 10'¢x 6' DEEP 10'¢x 6' DEEP VALERO ROAD UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF, OR ADDITION TO PLANS OR DOCUMENTS BEARING THE SEAL OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. ANY ALTERATION TO THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE DONE BY A PERSON ACTING UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE EDUCATION LAW. COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT NOT MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS INKED SEAL OR HIS EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID TRUE COPIES. DANIEL R. FALASCO, P.E., P.C DATE CONSULTING ENGINEER 2150 SMITHTOWN AVE., SUITE 5, RONKONKOMA, NY 11779 (516) 317-7209 I SCAU~,,_.:O, I DRAW,NC NO. 1 SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK DAN L FALASCO, P.I , P.C. 2150 SMITHTOWN AVENUE, SUITE 5 RONKONKOMA, NEW YORK 11779 VOICE (516) 317-7209 FAX (631) 467-7840 November 19,2011 Town of Southold Building Department 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Building Inspector Re: 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue, New York Gentlemen: Please be advised on Monday October 31,2011, this office provided inspection of the installation of the drainage structure labeled PLP2 on the attached As-Built drawing. In addition we witnessed the installation of the drainage pipe connecting ELP1 and ELP2. This office also took measurements of the other, previously installed, drainage structures at the site. The results of the measurements as well as a comparison of the proposed dimensions revealed insufficient capacity at PLP1 (2- 4'diam. x 6' deep). We advised the owner and on November 18, 2011 an additional structure, labeled PLPlC was installed (8' diam. x 8' deep). The results of all As-Built dimensions are as indicated on the attached drawing. Please be advised that the proposed structure PLP1 was constructed as three (3) structures that are now labeled PLPIA, PLP1B and PLP1C. Please be further advised that the capacity of the three (3) installed structures exceeds the capacity of the one proposed structure. Based on the field inspection and measurements of the drainage structures as described above, it is determined that the construction activities were performed in accordance with or exceeded the design plans. If you should have any questions, please give me a call. __~_/iu ly yours, Daniel Falasco, P.E. AS-BUILT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTED N59'42'10"E.......... ELP1 10'¢ x 1' DEEP I ELP2 10'¢ x160: DEEP ~ PLPlC ELP5 1 0'¢ x DEEP ~1 F"-"~...~.~._PLP1B PLP1A ELP4 10'¢ x106: DEEP ~ ~'"' DEEP '-I ~ ~........ PLP1A 10'¢ x ,_~ ..i......, PLP1 B PLP1C PLP2 10'¢ x 6' DEEP 173.74' 10'¢ x 1' DEEP 10'¢ x 10' DEEP 10'¢ x 6' DEEP 10'¢ x 10' DEEP 4'¢ x 6' DEEP 4'¢ x 6' DEEP 8'¢ x 8' DEEP 10'¢ x 6' DEEP ELP3 ! ROAD 28975 ROUTE 25 VALERO R~o ~5) CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK SERVICE STATION CONSULTING ENGINEER 2150 SMITHTOWN AVE., SUITE 5, RONKONKOMA, NY 11779 (516) 317-7209 SCALE DRAWING NO. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF, OR ADDITION TO PLANS OR DOCUMENTS BEARING THE SEAL OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. ANY ALTERATION TO THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE DONE BY A PERSON ACTING UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE EDUCATION LAW. COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT NOT MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS INKED SEAL OR HIS EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID TRUE COPIES. DATE DANIEL R. FALASCO, P.E., P.C PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Cha/r WILLIAM J. CREMEHS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILI~IG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 12, 2011 Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Valero Service Station SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Dear Ms. Moore: The Planning Board has inspected the site referenced above and has determined there are several unfinished items that must be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The Planning Board is concerned over diserepalacies in ~nage plans between the approved final site plan and what was constructed. The Town Engineer failed to receive notice of the drainage work being performed and, therefore, did not inspect its installation. To determine that drainage was installed as per site plan approval, a certification from an engineer is required. Please submit an engineer's report to certify that the drainage was installed in accordance with the approved site plan. If the drainage was modified in the field, the submission of an "as-built" drawing is required for our review and records. The engineer's report should certify that all changes and/or "as-built" structures are equal to or greater than the approved design. The Planning Board noted that the landscaping was not installed as shown on the landscaping plan along the northern property boundary. Due to the existence of a thick hedge on the eastern side, and tall trees with a thick canopy on the western side of this boundary line, the Planning Board will not require the vegetation shown on the site plan on the northern property line to be planted at this time. Should the trees or hedge along the northern property boundary be removed or die, the current occupant of the site will be required to install the evergreen vegetation as shown on the approved landscape plan. In addition, the Planning Board observed the existence of portable signs, which are considered a safety laaTard, as well as contributing to visual clutter and were not part of the site plan. They also noted that the traffic flow striping and arrows that were required to promote a safe and orderly site had faded considerably and were no longer visible. In summary, the following must be completed prior to the Planning Board's final inspection approval and prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued: 1. Engineer Certification of drainage 2. Removal of portable signs 3. Re-painting of traffic flow striping and arrows Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Heather Lanza, AICP Planning Director 2 PaRe Two - Town Plannin¢l Board Work Ses'-~,- 5/9/11 Location: 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutch.o__gue i -~S~i:i'i~i'~J~-i'¥i~'i'~-~ite pl~'"i~-~-~-~t~"~-n'~ersion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline se~i~ station to a 1,206 s.f. convenience store and gasoline se~ice station on an 18,473 sq. ff. lot in the Hamlet Business AEachments: L Staff Repo~ ~r0j~ct name: _ ~.[~' Hp~.~r~ ....................... L~M~:j._.1000-12~:~_~ [~ ....... ~ 715 Sound Avenue, 500' no~h of the intersection of Aldrich Lane and Sound Avenue, in Mattituck 5~]~i'~'~ ..................... 'gi~'i~-~&~'-~'~ s.f. ~i~i{U'~i"~-~'~--~' '~'~'~T~"~ a~ .............. ................ i . _ .............. ~ ......... ~_ .................................................................................. I_ ~a~.us~ ........................ ~?al Pending [~pectlon Action' i Review site inspection. A~chm~Bts: ......... ~ .. ~.a.~.~ ~ p_..A~t i~p~e_~e~ ...................................................... Project name: ,~ Southvlew Preserve SCTM#. 1 1000-87-5-21.7, 21.9, i ! 21.10, 21.11, 21.12 & I J 21.13 Location: I on the south side of Main Bayview Road, approximately' 90~)w-~{ .............. ...................................... ~__C_e_d__a_r.._D_r_j._v_e, _i_n__~_o_uthold _ Description: ! This proposal is to subdivide a 'i-;~-~'~--~-~--p~r~r~to thre~T(~t-s-'v~- I Lot 1 equals 44,735 s.f., Lot 2 equals 37,343 s.f. and Lot 3 equals 1 42,470 s.f., with the remaining 11.53 acres of the property to be , _ ~ i~_re__s_erve_d_a__s_open_ sp__a_c__e. _ S'~.t.u.S_L ..................... ]__C_ .o..n_d_j~!9_na_!_F i_n_a.!..A_ P_P_r. P_v...a_l_ .............................................................. Action: I Review request for extension of Conditional Final A_p.j~roval. 5:30 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda For Discussion: o:o Lieb Vines, LLC, 83-3-2.1: Review draft ZBA comments. o:o Proposed Local Law re: Amendments to Chapter 277, Wind Energy and Chapter 280 Zoning in connection with Small Wind Energy Systems & Accessory Apts. WORK SESSION AGENDA · SG~THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD" Monday, May 9, 201t -4:00 p.m. Applications ............................................... . --;'-'-; ............ ~--"~' ............. T .............................. Project name: Connecticut Municipal Electric t SCTM#:i 1000-6-8-7 & 3.2 Energy Cooperative L ~ ............................. Location: 1866 Central Ave. Fishers Island ....... i~,~ri'-p-t-i-(~'i- ............... Addition of 993 sq. ff. to the existing 7,144 sq. ft. diesel-electric generator fa _ci_l!~_o .n_..__a_._4_7_4~_1_ §?]:.. f~r~_a~[ c~_l _lo_ca_ t~ .e.~?_t_he__B u_s]..n_e_s~s _.D_.i_s_~rict._ .... ~.t..a~[u s] ..................... F~inal Pen d i n__g~n__s p~_c_t! o__n ......................................................................................... Action: Review screening. Location: on the north side of Orchard Street, approximately 1,008' west of Platt Road, in Orient Description: This standard subdivision to subdivide a 10-acm parcel into two lots where Lot 1 is 1.5 acres and Lot 2 is 6.5 acres, inclusive of a 2.5-acre building envelope and 6 acres of subdivision open space. Status: Conditional Sketch Al~prov._al .......................................................... Action: Review Archeolo_gical Report. _~taAh.m__e.n_t.s; .................. _s__La ff ._R__e_.~..o_ rt_ Ii-15~{-'~-a-r~- ....... -B~II, P~[I-~- ......................... ~--S-~Y~.~ 1000-20-1-1.4 & 1.5 -L~)]~a ~-.'- ................. ~-~ ~~[ ..................... I~6~,~r~p~i~. ...... ~his 75/75 Conservatio~-~U-~"~lT~;[~i~-n-pT(~po-~T~iii"~u%~v~9~ acre parcel into 3 lots where Lot 1 = 2 acres, Lot 2 = 3 acres (including a 1.66 acm r.o.w.), and Lot 3 = 14.44 acres of preserved agricultural land - the ~e_v_e_~ ~ _e ~.t_Rj ~Ls_~'~ ~_r_e_~[d_t o_...S_u.._ff__o. J k__ _c_~_u _n~ .................................................. _._S._t.B.t_u._s..'- .................... Pe_nding Action: Review Staff ReEg_~ ?_~_a_c_ h_m~e..n_t~ ~ ........ _Sta~ff__R_ep~ort ................................................................................ j Location: 2600 Oregon Road, Mattituck · Description: This site plan is for the proposed construction of two brick patios, one at 160 s.f. and the other 314 s.f., for an outdoor wine tasting area that will includ_e_._a_._3_,_8~8..s_.f. ~_rave_LE.a_r_k_i_n.q lot with con_n_ec_t_[n_g_~_a~e_d_f99tJ?._a_t.h_s:_ ' Status: New Application ' ..A.c[.q...n_ .......................................... . ._R__ey__e_w_.aj~.p ca t _o~.~f o_ [_co_mEe__t_e_n_e_s._s__a_n_ d_.c_o_..~s]_~_e_r _a~p_~.i. ~_g..~0 r~ i~ ._ ~ ~a~me_nt_s] ............... S_t~ff__R_e.p__o_~ ................................................................................................... Location: west side of Hoba~ Road, approximately 1,059 feet no~h from Ter~ ................................................. _~_ ~ s~ ....................................................................................... Description: This standard subdivision is to subdivide 2.32 acres into ~o lots where Status: ~onditional P re li~_~._A~p_[g~.~.! ...................................... .6~!~; ...................................... _B_¢~i_ ~_~¢_~_~.e~_.e.!~ .: ........................................................................................................................... , ~ WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANN1NG BOARD Monday, January 10, 2011 4:00 p.m. Project name: Valero Applicant's representative attending: Pat Moore Action: Review the site visit. Staffrecommends that the final inspection is not yet complete. · The canopy is not complete. Was supposed to be finished the same as the building roofing (shingle-like). · The landscaping was a question no plantings along the back fence were done. That should be done. And don't put a tree on the comer. · Portable signs are all over and should be removed. PB: OK with staff recommendations. Also note that we are waiving the tree in the comer. Get something from the applicant when they plan to finish the canopy, then KW will draft a letter and that it is OK to plant in the spring when weather permits. So they can get the c.o. after the canopy is done, but before the final plantings along the fence. Project name: Tully/Aries Estates Applicant's representative attending: Charles Cuddy Action: Accept the applicant's submission re: drainage and refer to the Town Engineer. PB: OK. Send to Jamie. Make sure the slopes are stable. Project name: Fields at Mattituck Applicant's representative attending: Scott Stay of Winhaven. Action: Review thc request for thc road. Review thc steps if thc board wants to consider approving this. Consider whether you ready to move to thc next step might the board actually consider approving this? What information do you nccd to consider this further? Planning Board is concerned that this isn't abandoned in the future. Winhavcn is OK with the road being on the west side. PB is leaning towards the road on the west side. Address the failed slope, address the soil windrows with arsenic. PB: OK, move this along to the next step. Submit thc plans. HL do a letter to Scott about thc next steps for subdivision amendment, covenant amendment. Project name: FIDCO lot line PB: OK to refer out. Add-ons: · Battaglia - submitted drainage plans on the impervious driveway. PB okay with sending the plans to engineer for review. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, January 10, 2011 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications H!stofica! Counci! Location: 27320 Main Road, on the slwlclo Main Road and Case's Lane, Cutchogue [ b~i~i'~io~i ~i~i~ ~it~ pi~ 1.38 acre parcel owned and operated by the Cutchogue/New Suffolk Historical Council. Status i New Site Plan Act on ~, Rev ew Staff Rep. orr. Location: ;~ 24435 NYS Route 25, 100' e/o Platt Road Orient Description: ~ parcel located on the north side of Main Road, approximately 100' east of Status i. Ste Plan ReYiow Action: . Review Staff Report. . Attachments: Staff Report Enginee.[!ng !n~pecto[,s Report LWRP Report Project name Valero Service Station i SCTM#: 1000-102-5-26 Location: 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Description: and gasoline service station to a 1,206 s.f. convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Status i..~pp~o?ed S~te P!an: App!!.cant.request f0.[.final.inspect!~)n~ Act on i R~Y. ew.s.~e nspect on ~!th.th~ planning Attachments: ! None ~ 56-1-1 Location: on the west side of Laurel Avenue, approximately 150 feet south of ye~neqott Drive in So~th.o!~ Description: This proposal is for a Standard Subdivision of a 50.0609 acre parcel into 18 lots and two (2) open space parcels where the lots range in size from 28,235 square feet to 36,400 square feet, with the open space parcels totaling 35.0227 acres, excluding the wetlands in the R-80 Zoning District. t .............. Action: ] Review request from via pmp0~d..subdivision. AEachments: Staff Repo~ 12/28/2010 14:57 FAX 631 765 4643 ~,IO()[,~E lAW OFFICES PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 5 I020 Main Road Southold, New York Teh (631) 765-4330 Fax: (63 I) 765-4643 ~002 BY FAX TO 765-3136 Attn: Martin Sidor, Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southo]d NY 11971 RE: December 28, 2010 DEC 29 2010 Valero Service Station 28975 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY SCTM: 1000~102-5-26 Dear Mr. Sidor and Board Members: My client advised that he has completed the work at the premises. I hereby request a Certificate of Occupancy compliance inspection of the premises. Please advise me of the date of the inspection. My client would like to be present for same. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. PCM/mr cc by fax: Thank you. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore Mike Verity, Southold Town Building Dept. 12/28/2010 14:57 FAX 631 765 4643 '~IOORE IA~I OFFI(J:~S ~]001 PATRIC1A C. MOORE AUorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold. New York 11971 lek (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631 ) 765-4643 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Patricia C. Moore. This information is in'sended solely for use by the individual entity ]lamed as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. F=: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET IF TR3~NSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. CLIENT NAME: ~/¢%?-~ OPERATOR: Winser, Krist~ From: Sent: To: Subject: Patricia C. Moore [pcmoorel@optonline.net] Monday, June 14, 2010 9:46 AM Winser, Kristy Valero My clients have advised me that the TV monitors have been removed and the retractors have been installed. We await the Board's resolution tonight. Pat Town 1 lall Annex 5437,5 M~tin P.O. Box 117!~ Solllllo]d, NY 11971 Telephone (G:gl) 7G,~-1802 F:cx ((i~ 1) B! III,DIN(; I)I';PAI¥1'MI';NT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chairman JUN 8 Sovt~otd Town Planr~ina Board FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: June 7, 2010 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Valero Service Station Location: 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000 Section 102 - Block 05 - Lots 26 Date: October 20, 2008 Revised Date: May 11, 2010 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 144 AND 280 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Convenience Store IS A PERMITTED USE IN THIS HB DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. 'h 1 Vri Chief Building Inspector .WORK SESSION AGENDA SO0'I'HOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, June 7, 2010 4:00 p.m. Applications Project name: C JCl Corp. I SCTM#: I 45-4-4.1 Location: 74495 NYS Route 25 Description: This site plan is for the proposed construction of one building of 8,960 sq. ' ft. with the first floor containing, rental space, contractor's business office garage storage and an apartment on the second floor on a 1.036 acre parcel in the B Zone. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review site plan and comments received. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: T-Mobile Northeast I SCTM#: 1 1000-109-2-17.1 Location: The Presbyterian Chumh or Society of Cutchogue, 27245 Main Road Description: The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless communication facility having interior mounted antennas within an existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review draft resolution. Attachments: Draft Resolution Project name: Shinn Vineyards I SCTM#: I 1000-100-4-3.1 Location: 2000 Oregon Road, Mattituck Description: Proposed site plan for the as-built construction of four (4) buildings including a 1,646 sq. ft. wine making and wine tasting building with 336.3 sq. ft. of deck, a 2,730 sq. ft. wine storage barn, an 884.1 sq. ft. accessory storage building and a 206.1 sq. ft. frame shed on a 979,664 sq. ft. (22.49 acres) parcel whereas, the development area is 53,078 sq. ft. (1.21 acres) in the Agricultural Conservation District. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review draft resolution. Attachments: Draft Resolution Project name: Valero Service Station ...... ~-SCTIVI#: I 1000-102-5-26 Location: on the n/w comer of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. Status: Under Review Action: Review draft resolution. Attachments: Draft Resolution Winser, Krist~' From: Sent: To: Subject: Patricia C. Moore [pcmoorel @optonline.net] Friday, June 04, 2010 1:11 PM Winser, Kristy Re: Valero Dept of health Hi Kristy- I checked with the client, the work to the site did not require an application to the Health Department for sanitary. Please proceed with your resolution. Thanks, Pat Winser, Kristy wrote: > Hi Pat, > I'm working on the file for Valero for final approval and I need your Health Department approval for the resolution. > > Thank you. > > Kristy Winser > Senior Planner > Town of Southold Planning Department > P.O. Box 1179 > 53095 Main Road > Southold, New York > Phone: (631) 765-1938 > Fax: (631) 765-3136 > Kristy. Winser@town.southold.ny.us > > STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 STANLEY GEE ACTING COMMISSIONER June 1, 2010 Mr. William J. Lahti, P.E Lahti Engineering, PC 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Dear Mr. Lahti: Your May 12, 2010 Submission Valero Service Station Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM 1000-10200-0500-026000 Our Case No. 09-053P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project' which were submitted to us for review. Upon review of the proposed work, we find that the plans are acceptable as submitted. This site plan approval for highway work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and no further revisions are made to the plans. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. Prior to issuing a Highway Work Permit, you must submit the required permit fee and Surety Bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that the permittee provide protective liability insurance. This must be accomplished by either submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (previously sent), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. A Highway Work Permit Application was previously sent, which shall to be completed and returned to us. The same party must secure the application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond. · 'Mr. William J. Lahti June 1, 2010 Page 2 of 2 All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $200.00 Bond Amoum: $10,000.00 Insurance Fee: $150.00 or Perm 17 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachments: Perm 17, Perm 33, Perm 44 cc: ]dr. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold /Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner, Town of Southold Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631 ) 765-4643 May 28, 2010 Southold Town Planning Board Martin Sidor, Chair P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Valero Gas Station 1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Sidor: As a follow up to the Planning Board work session on May 24, 2010, my client has provided the enclosed documents. 1. The gas tank manhole covers located on the north side of the property are not flush to the ground, the covers are tapered and known as "Fibrelite" covers. The Fibrelite covers over the tanks are rings that hold the covers, are tapered to the ground, and the covers are designed to allow water to flow around the opening to avoid any hazardous conditions. Due to the climate in the northeast these are highly recognized as the preferred type of cover for endurance and safety. The covers themselves are not metal, but fiberglass material, and are designed with an anti-slip design to prevent tripping. 2. With regard to the fuel dispensers, enclosed are the specification of the external hose retractor. They are easily installed and would provide the ability for a vehicle to be fueled on either side, regardless of the location of the gas tank. They are legal and are commonly used at gas station across the country. 3. It is my understanding that the architectural review committee recommended to the Board that we remove the TV monitors as a condition of site plan approval. It was the Board's request that the monitors be removed prior to site plan approval. The site plan is complete, the public hearing held, and the site plan is ready for Board approval on June 14th. Please be advised that the clients will incur significant cost to remove the equipment, a penalty for early termination of the contract for the TV monitors, and loss of advertising revenue. In a show of good faith, they will remove the TV monitors prior to June 14th. However, we are equally relying on the Board's good faith assurance that the site plan will be on the June 14~n meeting for a resolution. If there is anything else you need please do not hesitate to call. /~r~Cia C Moore cc: East End Marketing Composite ManhOle Covers Tr, e or~grnai ra,sed cover, designed with a simple water check ]n the frame to keep ra~nwa:or ,nstallat~on Thrs cover ~s no sea ed so excess surface water can dra~n into the ground beh~,'een the skc: ,'~;d sump Stol! an award w~nn,ng design, this cover range offe s a cost effective solulion for all sump access ~nstalla~ons Locks available Product Code Description FL36/HD 36" d~a heavy duty raised cover and alur"ir'¢um frer-s Contact Fibrelite if steal frame is required. POMECO 102 SPRING BALANCE SINGLE HOSE RETRACTORS POMECO 102 Spring Balance Single Hose Retractom keep excess hose off the ground and out of the way, prolonging hose life and reducing potential hazards. The POMECO 102 is a California Air Resources Board (CARB) certified Stage II component for use with single and dual hose dispensers as per Executive Order G-70-52-AM Materials Housing: cast aluminum Cable: black polyester Post: aluminum POMog .o Features · Easy to use- The spring-loaded reel and stretch-resistant cable provide smooth and steady tension throughout hose extension and return. · Easy to maintain - The removable sideplate provides full access to the mechanism for easy tension adjustment and unit maintenance. A convenient safety thumb screw is provided to lock the reel in place dudng tension adjustment. · Field adjustable for various hose, nozzle, swivel, breakaway combinations - No need for upgrading components if a breakaway or swivel is added to the hose assembly. Simply change the tension setting on the spring-loaded hose reel. Multiple mounting options - The POMECO 102 retractor housing is tapped on the top for bolting to overhead crossbars, and on the side for mounting to vertical posts. The 102 is available as a retractor kit (including post, retractor and mounting hardware) or as separate components. Models are also available for aboveground storage tank (AST) applications. AST models include a 44" (112 cm) post with a freestanding base. 102 Spring Balance Hose Retractor Instruction Sheet Order Number: H15853PA NOTE: See OPW's Website at: wvcw,opw.fc.com for preduct instruction sheets, trouble shooting guides, how-to-use guide and to view the Do's & Don'ts at the Gas Pump video. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, May 24, 2010 4:00 p,m. Site Plans Project name: Shinn Vineyards I SCTM#: I 1000-100-4-3.1 Location: 2000 Oregon Road, on the s/s/o Oregon Road, 1,162.35' e/o Mill Lane in Mattituck Description: Proposed site plan for the as-built construction of four (4) buildings including a 1,646 sq. ft. wine making and wine tasting building with 336.3 sq. ft.,of deck, a 2,730 sq. ft. wine storage barn, an 884.1 sq. ft. accessory storage building and a 206.1 sq. ft. frame shed on a 979,664 sq. ft. (22.49 acres) parcel whereas, the development area is 53,078 sq. ft~ (1.21 acres) in the Agricultural Conservation District. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review re-submission and recommend to schedule the application for final approval. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: Regina's Garden I SCTM#: I 1000-120-3-5 Location: 1150 Sound Ave., on the south side of Sound Ave., 300 feet west of Aldrich Lane, Mattituck Description: This site plan application is to convert an existing 1,400 s;f. building to an office in connection with the over-all farm use of the site on 1.03 acres located in the A-C Zoning District. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review site plan application and recommend for the Planning Board to accept the application and begin the referral process. _. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: Location: Description: Status: Action: Attachments: Valero Service Station t SCTM#: I 1000-102-5-26 __ on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. Under Review Review revised plans. Staff Report ___ Project name: Southold Free Library Expansion SCTM# I 1000-61-1-14, 15.1 15.2 Location: 53705 Main Road, Southold Proposed expansion ZBA is requesting comments. ' Review draft comments. Descriptio_n:__ ...... Status: Action: Attachments: Draft Comments PROJECT SCOPING PLANNING APPLICATIONS May 18, 2010 9:30pm i Prolect name* ,~--- · . _2_ ............. ~ Location: [-b-e~'~r-i~ii~- ~'~ ................... 825 Route 25, Green[~_~_~__ ......... This site plan is for construction of a~-'~:~,i-~-EC'~ii;d-i~ w~{l~ss~-~i-a-te-8-" parking for the purposes of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District. New Site Plan L ..... r~,.~ ~. ~. _-P-~j~-~-n-~r~? .... I ~eg~na s Garden / Location: ~ 1150 Sound Ave, Ma. Euck ~on: I Zoning Boa~ of Appeals Request for Com~~~ ~tatus: I New s~e plan '~ ............ ......... ~¢ ~¢¢ ~> ~ .......... Project name: ] Valero Se~ice ~ti~ ........ ~M¢:T 18~0-102-5-2¢ .... Location: on the n~ ~mer of Main Road and D~ot Lane, Cutchogue .... ~~T .............. ~ ~ '[~&-~%~~ ~¢~ automotive repair shop I and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service -S~{~'s: .............. _[ station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Ham et Bus ness Zoning District. Under Review · / Project name: Southold Free Library Expans.on~'SCTM#. 61-1-1~t. 15.1 & 15.2 ¢1~, Location: I 53705 Main Road, Southold _D_.~o_n: [ 05/14/2010 15:39 FAX 631 765 4643 MOORE LAW OFFICES PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Planning Board ~]002 May 14, 2010 Southold Town Planning Board Martii% Sidor, Chair P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Valero Gas Station 1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Sidor: As a follow up to the Planning Board work session on April 26, 2010, William Lahti, P.E. has forwarded to you revised plans which include the following items requested at the work session: Valero will have 2 signs: (1) sign on the building (Drawing A- 2) and (2) electrical sign for price on canopy SP-4 landscaping: Sargent Juniper & spirea (dwarf pink princes) as recommended by Planning Board SP-1 show potential future cross easement on west: side of property SP-1 Curb added on client property with grass between sidewalk & curb to direct vehicle access. This change was made in accordance with the Board's recommendation and after discussions between Mark Wolf~ang P.E. and Patrick Lenihan P.E. SP-1 one employees parking on west side, ~n front, the closest parking space to the trash container Please disregard the tanker truck turning template on the Vehicle Que Plan (SP-7) in the Lahti re-submission. ~he correct 05/14/2010 15:39 FAX 631 765 4643 MOORE LAW OFFICES ~ ~lanning Board ~003 template was prepared by Patrick Lenihan (Figure A and Figure B) and submitted at the public hearing. Patrick Lenihan P.E. also testified as to the adequacy of the tanker truck turning path. The plans prepared by Dunn Engineering dated March 8, 2010 replaced the plans prepared by William Lahti, P.E. submitted on Ma~ch 4, 2010 and resubmitted with the above site plan on May 13, 2010. Thank you for your consideration. cc: East End Marketing 05/14/2010 15:39 FAX 031 765 4643 MOORE LAW OFFICES PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road $outhold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Planning Board ~OOl FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Patricia C, M~ore. This informati~)n is intended solely for use by the in dividual entity named as the recipient hereof If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, p/ease notify us by telephone imme_.d~.~te/y so we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. RE: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET IF TRANSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK. AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. comments: PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 May 14, 2010 Southold Town Planning Board Martin Sidor, Chair P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 1 7 2 010 Re: Valero Gas Station 1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Sidor: As a follow up to the Planning Board work session on April 26, 2010, William Lahti, P.E. has forwarded to you revised plans which include the following items requested at the work session: Valero will have 2 signs: (1) sign on the building (Drawing A- 2) and (2) electrical sign for price on canopy SP-4 landscaping: Sargent Juniper & spirea (dwarf pink princes) as recommended by Planning Board SP-1 show potential future cross easement on west side of property SP-1 Curb added on client property with grass between sidewalk & curb to direct vehicle access. This change was made in accordance with the Board's recommendation and after discussions between Mark Wolfgang P.E. and Patrick Lenihan P.E. SP-1 one employees parking on west side, in front, the closest parking space to the trash container Please disregard the tanker truck turning template on the Vehicle Que Plan (SP-7) in the Lahti re-submission. The correct template was prepared by Patrick Lenihan (Figure A and Figure B) and submitted at the public hearing. Patrick Lenihan P.E. also testified as to the adequacy of the tanker truck turning path. The plans prepared by Dunn Engineering dated March 8, 2010 replaced the plans prepared by William Lahti, P.E. submitted on March 4, 2010 and resubmitted with the above site plan on May 13, 2010. Thank you for your consideration. cc: East End Marketing 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts May 12, 2010 Via overnight mail Ms. Kristy Winser Southold Town Hall 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 Dear Ms. Winser: In accordance with comments made during the recent Planning Board work session, enclosed please find (9) copies of the modified site development plan and (9) copies of the building plan. I believe all of the Board's concerns have been addressed. If any further modifications are necessary, please inform us as soon as possible so that we can make the necessary changes and still be placed on the May calendar. Thank you. Sincerely, __ · ' . Lah~P.E. doc: East End Marketing w/encl. 081M3t 10 Town PB PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Or'vICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: From: Date: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner~{-,~ April 12, 2010 Site plan application for Valero SCTM#1000-102-5-26 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. Attached is the floor plan in connection to the Valero site plan application. Please review an advise in accordance with the new legislation of the 800 sq. feet as discussed during the scoping meeting we had for this application. Thank you for your cooperation. Encls: Floor Plan PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 April 9, 2010 Southold Town Planning Board Martin Sidor, Chair P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Valero Gas Station 1000-102-5-26 APR 2010 Dear Mr. Sidor: As a follow up to the Planning Board public hearing dated March 8, 2010, and the Board's last correspondence dated January 27, 2010 which requested additional information, in your files are the following submissions: 1. The traffic analysis was submitted on December 28, 2009,and forwarded to the Southold Town Transportation Commission. To our knowledge Patrick Lenihan, P.E. of Dunn Engineering Associates, Inc has adequately addressed all the traffic concerns. 2. The site plan was forwarded to the Cutchogue Fire District for comment. At the public hearing we responded to the comments in your file from Bob Fisher, Cutchogue Fire District, and we addressed the traffic circulation within the station and safety issues. Please note that the comments should address the convenience store use, gasoline sales has a certificate of occupancy. 3. At the public hearing Patrick Lenihan submitted a revised tank truck turning path (Figure A and Figure B). He also testified as to the adequacy of the tank truck turning path. The plans prepared by Dunn Engineering replaced the plans submitted on March 4, 2010 by William Lahti, P.E. which were incomplete. Mr. Lahti submitted a revised floor plan on March 4, 2010 which complies with the 800 square feet limitation. In accordance with the definition adopted by the Town Board, the 800 square feet applies to the convenience store area, not the gasoline sales area. The convenience store counter area and storage equals 775 square feet. A portion of the interior space is reserved for the area dedicated to the gasoline sales. It is my understanding that you have forwarded the floor plan to Mike Verity, Building Inspector, for his review. I will follow up with Mr. Verity to confirm that he is satisfied with the floor plan. 5. The Suffolk County Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposed conversion of the existing building to an accessory convenience store. We believe that their decision is in error, nevertheless, the Planning Board must override the SCPC in order to approve this project. As I stated at the public hearing, this project was exempt from site plan review. A stop work order was issued pending site plan review of the ~'convenience store". My client has submitted all the documents and studies requested, the file is complete, and we ask that the site plan be approved, as submitted. Thank you for your consideration. Ver~ ~y yours, ~,.Batricia C. Moore cc: East End Marketing 207 Hallock Road, SuRe 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts April 8, 2010 Via overnight mail Ms. Kristy Winser Southold Town Hall 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re~ Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 Dear Ms. Winser: As requested, enclosed please find (5) additional copies of the modified building floor plan. Should you require anything further, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Thank you. Sincerely, William J. L~ti, P.'E. doc: 08043i09 town PB APR - Winser, Kristy Page 1 of 2 From: 'Sent: To: Cc: Winser, Kristy Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:20 PM 'Betsy Perkins' Mark Wolfgang (E-mail); Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail); Lanza, Heather Subject: RE: Betsy; There has been process in each case and we are moving forward as planned. We had in-house scoping meetings on each application last week as well as were discussed during the Transportation Commission meeting held on Monday. For 7-11, the Transportation Committee will also be reviewing the traffic study and I'm waiting for their comments. Also, it should be noted that your approval from the Health Dept. for 7-11 is important for us to review as this may affect the site plan and design elements ( overall landscaping ect..). I also wanted to give you a heads that the DOT responded to an inquiry the Planning Board had regarding"no right hand turns on red" from Main Road @ the factory avenue intersection whereas the Transportation Commission concurred on this restriction. This issue should be addressed on your next submission to the DOT using case number 01-O99P. As for Valero, I will need a floor plan to be submitted in conformance with the new legislation of the 800 sq. feet. I had advised Pat to meet with Mike Verity on this (also noted in my letter dated 1/27/10). Has this been done? I will inform you of when these applications will be ready to be scheduled for a work session. Let me know if you have any other questions, Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P,O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy. Winser~,town.southold.ny.us .... -Original Message ..... From: Betsy Perkins [mailto:mooreattys@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 3:t, 2010 11:54 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Hi; Can you give me the status of Valero & Gama (Mattituck 7-11)? Thanks, Betsy Perkins LA Law Offices of 3/31/2010 Page 2 of 2 William D. Moore; tel # 631 765 4663 Patricia C, Moore; tel # 631 765-4330 fax # for both; 631 765 4643 NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the named recipient only. It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, by using your reply button to advise us of such error. Thank you. 3/31/2010 PROJECT SCOPING PLANNING APPLICATIONS Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:30pm Location: This site is located on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue ~'~i~i~i ¥'~iS w~{~' '~i~'~ i~'~;w'~'~'~' '~w~i'~ ~'~{~ ~' ~xi~i'~ '~'~'~ ~/~ '~'i~ ~ho P and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service stat on on a 18 473 sg. ft lot in the hamlet business Zon ng District. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review revised site plan and applicants submission including a traffic analysis. Review applicants request to the County to reconsider their AEachments: i Staff Repo~, Traffic Analysis, and applicants leEer addressed to the C9 U~y ~.~ .h..tb.e..[.e_s Pgns.e..fmm_ the..CgB, nt~.~ Location: s/s/o Orego. n .Ro. ad....1_...1_ 62:~5~i.e(o.. Mi!!. L_a.n.e....!~...~a~i_tuck ~'~i'~ii~i ! Proposed site plan for the as-built construction of four (4) buildings including a 1,646 sq. ff. wine making and wine tasting building with 336.3 i sq. ft. of deck, a 2,730 sq. ft. wine storage barn, an 884.1 sq. ft. ~; accessory storage building and a 206.1 sq. ft. frame shed on a 53,078 :, scI. ft. parcel in the Agricultural Conservation District. Status: ~ Site Plan Review ~i~.P.i '..R.e~i~w.~PP!.!~.[~t'.~. ~.b~issi0n.~ ..................................................... [.Atta.c~!~rqen~ Sta~ R~pg[t Sender: su~joct: Submission Without a Cover Letter Dal:e: Con~h-a~nts MEMORANDUM VALERO GAS STATION PUBLIC HEARING FACTS The property is zoned HB and is located on the comer of NYS Route 25 and Depot Lane, Cutchogue (SCTM#1000-102-5-26). The property is improved with a gas station, three service pumps, and canopy containing built-in lighting and fire suppression. The applicant has proposed to convert the service bays to an accessory convenience store. The applicant, 808 Realty Corp., was required to replace their underground petroleum tanks by January 1,2010, pursuant to Suffolk County Sanitary Code. building permit application filed on May 2' 2008 for the replacement of the petroleum storage tanks together with plans prepared by Lehti Engineering & Environmental Consulting, PC which showed the underground tanks, including a new diesel fuel tank. The plans provide detailed drawings of the underground piping to a double gas pump fixture containing four fueling positions, and a single pump station containing two fueling positions located adjacent to the existing building. building permit #33893 issued on May 13, 2008 which permitted construction of the petroleum storage tanks and gas dispensing fixtures as shown on the plans. building permit #34056 was issued to replace an expired building permit for the canopy. (The canopy was granted a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board in 1995 and the Planning Board granted site plan approval for the canopy on June 12, 1995. ) The tank replacements and work on the pump islands commenced immediately. The underground tanks were replaced and underground lines and the pump stations were installed under the supervision of both the Suffolk County Health Department and Southold Town Building Department. In accordance with the plans, the diesel pump station required construction of the separate diesel fuel tank at a cost of $100,000. The fuel tanks and pump stations were constructed in accordance with building permit #33893. Renovations to the existing building, without any expansion, were started, however, a stop work order was issued on July 1, 2008 for conversion of the repair bays to the proposed accessory convenience store. The Stop Work Order was lifted on July 2, 2008, when the app)icant applied to the building department for the alterations to the existing building of the proposed "convenience store". By letter on or about July 2, 2008 Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector, auttloriZed the work permitted under building permit #33893Z to continue. The letter states that upon completion of construction, allowed under building permit #33893Z, the applicant was permitted to operate a gasoline station and automotive uses.(See attached Exhibit A, letter from Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector). On July 22, 2008 a CO (#33166) was issued for the gas pumps and CO (#33165) for the canopy ( See attached Exhibit B, copies of both C.Os). The gasoline station and automotive uses are a permitted use, have a certificate of occupancy, and are not the subject of this site plan. This public hearing is for the purposes of reviewing a site plan for the conversion of an automotive repair shop to an accessory convenience store.(See attached Exhibit C- Notice of Disapproval dated July 17, 2008). GASOLINE STATION HAS C.O. AND IS EXEMPT FROM SITE PLAN The building is existing, the gas station use is a pre-existing nonconforming structure with a pre-existing nonconforming commercial use. The gas station was issued a CO and on July 17, 2008 the building department referred the applicant to the Planning Board for site plan of the accessory "convenience store". The gasoline service station with plans showing the diesel pump station has been properly issued a CO. The building was not expanded, therefore, the existing gas station did not require site plan review. The applicant has cooperated with requests of the Planning Board which included a full site plan detailing both the gas station use and the convenience store. The site plan details queuing for the gas sales, landscaping, modifications to curb cuts, and other requirements of full site plan review. A Traffic Impact Assessment was prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. which addressed the diesel sales and the accessory convenience store. The traffic engineer concluded that there would be no traffic impact by the diesel sales or the accessory convenience store. The extensive review of the site supports unanimous approval of this site plan for the accessory convenience store. ACCESSORY CONVENIENCE STORE DOES NOT REQUIRE SITE PLAN REVIEW Site Plan review of an accessory convenience store does not require full site plan review. The Town Code specifically protects existing businesses and property owners from expensive and time-consuming site plan review. (See Southold Town Code 280-123(A) (1)) According to the Southold Town Code, the building department, upon receipt of the plans for the convenience store in June of 2008, should have issued a building permit for the interior renovations for the conversion of the service bays to accessory convenience store. Since there was no expansion of the existing structure, site plan for the convenience store was not legally required. Pursuant to Southold Town Code 280-123(A) (1) (a) the structure containing a nonconforming preexisting commemial use may be expanded up to 15% without site plan review. Even if the building department referred the conversion of the existing automotive repair shop to an accessory convenience store for site plan review, pursuant to 280-123 (A)(1)(b), the structure containing a nonconforming preexisting commercial use may be expanded more than 30%, provided the following site remediation measures, in full or in part, as shall be determined by the Planning Board within its sole discretion, are included as an essential element of the aforesaid expansion: [1] Substantial enhancement of the overall site landscaping and/or natural vegetation I2] Employment of best visual practices by upgrades to existing building facades and/or design of new buildings and/or additions to existing buildings which accurately or more accurately depict the historic and/or existing rural character of the immediate and nearby neighborhood(s). The improvements to the property meet and exceed this standard. [ 1 ] applicant proposed substantial enhancement of the overall site landscaping and/or natural vegetation. The landscape plan (SP-4) prepared by Lahti Engineering details the landscaping which complies with 25% of the site. [2] the building facade has been upgraded, building painted and windows replaced. The site has been cleaned up with the elimination of the repair garage. Because the Planning Board required a full site plan, rather than the limited review which the code requires, the plan was referred to Suffolk County Planning Commission. The Suffolk County Planning Commission (SCPC) is not aware of the limited review provided in the Southold Town Code which should have resulted in SCPC recommendation for local determination. They may not have had the benefit of our traffic study, and they certainly did not have the NYSDOT approval. Contrary to the wealth of information and local knowledge of Cutchogue, the commission denied the application citing overdntensification of the use and creation of a roadway traffic hazard. Their recommendation is contrary to the facts of this project and the history of this properly. Two automobile repair bays are discontinued and an accessory convenience store is proposed. An automotive repair facility is a heavy commercial use. Vehicle repairs demand more parking of repair vehicles, often including some vehicle sales, parking and storing of vehicles under repair, and activities which come into conflict with gasoline sales. Accessory convenience stores at gasoline service stations are a welcome aesthetic improvement to the property as the sites are generally cleaner than traditional gas stations with repair garages. The previously approved site plan for the canopy asked the owner to provide parking for the two repair bays. East of the subject property is the SUN station which contains gasoline sales, a convenience store and automobile repair shop. The Sun station is similarly a pre-existing nonconforming use and operates without conflict with Route 25. The Board can observe stacking of the vehicle repairs, cars displayed for sale on the site and the typical activity associated with the three uses- gasoline sales, repair service and a convenience store. They are a good business and good neighbors and they should be supported. See attached photographs of the vehicle storage associated with the repair shop. The Valero property, similarly, is a good business and good neighbor. The uses will be reduced in "intensity of use", not increased, by elimination of the repair garage. As a matter of law, the property will eliminate a second principal use and add an accessory use in its place. The Suffolk County Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the application is refuted by the traffic study by Dunn Engineering which concludes that the diesel pump and the conversion of the automotive service use to a convenience store will not adversely affect the site or roadway operations. The property is situated next to the Cutchogue 7-11. The proposed convenience store, accessory to the gasoline sales, will be used with gasoline sales rather than as a destination. For consumers not purchasing gasoline products, the study concludes that these consumers are more likely to go to the 7-11 for their purchase. In addition, the New York State DOT has issued a preliminary approval letter dated February 1, 2010 for this project. Finally, the site plan provides equal or better emergency access around the building than the 1995 approved site plan containing the automobile repair bays. The relocation of the parking spaces from the westerly property line to the rear ( northerly property line) provides greater access for fire apparatus. As with the 1995 site plan, the back of the building has grass and is accessible and unencumbered. The diesel pump complies with all applicable codes and has a C.O. The placement of the dumpster can be located wherever the Planning Board recommends. The proposed location of the dumpster, behind the building, provides the best screening from view. The economic viability of gasoline service stations is dependent on other uses on the site. In the past, repair garages provided the economic support to gasoline service stations. However, repair shops are closing because the population has replaced their older vehicles with new vehicles. New vehicles have complicated electronic and computer systems which owners take to the car dealerships for repairs rather than to their neighborhood repair man. The accessory convenience store has replaced the repair shops at gasoline service stations. The sales at convenience stores provide economic relief to gasoline service stations. Gasoline service stations are extremely expensive to maintain. In addition to the extensive regulatory requirements, the cost of tank replacement, which was mandated by Suffolk County prior to January 1, 2010, has closed many small gas stations. The cost to replace the existing tanks at this site was $400,000.00. The margin of profit for each gallon of gasoline is minimal. Denial of the convenience store would adversely impact the economic viability of this gasoline service station. Cutchogue could lose another gas station. CONVENIENCE STORE LEGISLATION The Town Board adopted on November 4, 2009 a local law amending the HB zoning district to address gas stations with an accessory convenience store. However, we object to application of this law to the subject project and we reserve all challenges to the application of this law to the project. The"convenience store" legislation was adopted 16 months after the owner sought permission to convert the existing service bays to an accessory convenience store. According to 280-123 (A)(1)(a) no site plan was required where the existing structure is not expanded. The Planning Board had an approved site plan from 1995. The property had site plan approval, the repair garage use was addressed in the 1995 site plan review. In1995 the Planning Board addressed parked cars for the repair garage. As was detailed in the traffic assessment, this convenience store will, most likely, be used by gas patrons, requiring very little, short term, parking. The proposed convenience store would lessen the activity on the site and is a reduction of uses on the site. The repair garage was a second principal use while the convenience store is an accessory use, incidental to the gasoline sales. But even if the conversion of the interior space was considered an expansion of over 30% of the existing structure, the Planning Board should have limited their scope of review to 280- 123 (A)(1)(b) [1] Substantial enhancement of the overall site landscaping and/or natural vegetation, and [2] Employment of best visual practices by upgrades to existing building facades and/or design of new buildings and/or additions to existing buildings which accurately or more accurately depict the historic and/or existing rural character of the immediate and nearby neighborhood(s). Moreover, only minor changes to the approved site plan would have been required. A minor amendment to the site plan could have been accomplished in very little time, without referrals, and at a minimal cost to the property owner. When the applicant submitted a site plan which complied with 280-123 (A)(l)(b), the site plan should have been approved immediately. Nevertheless, the Planning Board has disregarded 280-123. The site plan was referred to other agencies which insisted on greater expense and imposed greater restrictions on the property. The review continued to be delayed, as is customary with full site plan review. The Town Board adopted legislation, 16 months after the plan was eligible for approval, which now threatens the viability of this project and contradicts the intent of 280-123. Commercial property owners were assured by the Town Board that 280- 123 would protect existing structures and business which were pre-existing nonconforming from over-regulation. The Valero gasoline service station, an existing business, which proposed to eliminated the automobile repair garage with an accessory convenience store is precisely the type of existing business which the Town Code protected. Notwithstanding our objections to application of the "convenience store" legislation, the applicant conforms to this legislation. The convenience store is less than 800 square feet in size, provides adequate parking, the exterior appearance of the building has been significantly improved, the parking will be striped, the existing landscaping is enhanced, and ingress and egress into the site has been improved. All these improvement exceed the standards set forth in the Town Code. Notwithstanding our objections to this process, the site plan has been submitted, it is the subject of a public hearing, and at this time it must be approved. We respectfully request that in the interest of justice the Planning Board vote to override the Suffolk County Planning Commission which recommended to deny the site plan, and vote to approve the site plan. ~_....Patrllcia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 631-765-4330 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John Tsunis Tsunis & Gasparas 801 Motor Parkway Happaugue, NY 11788 Re: Valero - Cutchogue Dear Mr. Tsunls: Based on our conversation, the Southold Town Building Department will lift the stop work order issued against the Valero property in Cutchogue, NY (SCTM# 1000-102-5- 26), effective immediately. However, only work permitted under building permit #33893Z is permitted to continue. Upon completion of construction, allowed under building permit #33893Z, your client will be permitted to operate a gasoline station and automotive uses only. Any additional proposed uses must first be approved by this office. If you have any questions please feel free to contact this office at (631) 765-1802, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully Yours, Michael Verity, Chief Builfling Ihspector FOP3~ NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ~o: Z-33166 07/22/08 THL9 C~I~TIFIES t~at the bu/]~4'~:3 SERVICE OR GAS STATION Lo~ation of ~ty: 28975 ~IN ~ ~UE (HOUSE NO.) (ST~ET) (~ET) ~ty T~. 473889 ~ion 102 Bl~k 5 ~t 26 confo~s s~st~tially to the Application for Building Pe~it heretofore fil~ ~ ~s offi~ ~t~ ~Y 6~ 2008 p~s,~-t to w~ ~l~g Pe~t ~. 33893-Z ~t~ ~Y 13, 2008 was issued, ~d confo~ to all of the redirects of the applic~le provisions of the law. The occup~ for which this certificate is issued is REP~C~ OF EXISTING T~ ~ ~ ~ISTING ~ STATION AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to REALTY CORP 808 (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. 8315 o7/=1/o8 o7/~8/o8 Authorized Signature Rev. 1/81 FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NO: Z-33165 Date: 07/22/08 THIS CERTIFI~ that the bui]al-g FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM Location of Proper~¥: 28975 MAIN ED (HOUSE NO.) (STP~ET) County Tax~pNO. 473889 Sectioa 102 Block 5 Subdivision · .ot 26 Filed Map NO. __ ~ot No. -- (HAMLET) conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore file~ in ~hls office ~ated JULY 1, 2008 pur~,a-t to which Building Permit NO. 34056-Z dated O~JLY 10, 2008 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is INSTALLATION OF A FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to REALTY CORP 808 (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. ~uM~-OLKC0~FI~DEP~OFHEALTHAPPROVAL N/A ~'~.R,..-i'~LICAL ,,.asicI~FICAT~NO. 8315 07/18/08 P~BERS ~TIF/CATIO~ DATED N/A Authorized signature Rev. 1/81 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 17, 2008 TO: 808 Realty Corp. PO Box 1006 Westhampton Beach, NY 11798 Please take notice that your application dated June 27, 2008 For permit to convert an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station use at Location of property: 28975 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 102 Block5 Lot 26 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this conforming 21,279 square foot parcel in the Hamlet Business District (HB), pursuant to Article XXIV, Section 280-127, requires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. A Stop Work Order was issued by this department on July 1~ 2008, when it was discovered that the applicant was working outside the scope of the existing, building oermit #33893Z (by converting ~., existine building to a convenience store). The stop work Order was lifted on July 2~ 2008, when the applicant applied to the building department for a "convenience store" and agreed only to operate a ~ i~ e'servi¢~,station un~l p~er approvals were obtained. '~Ffi'-thorized signa e Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board MEMORANDUM VALERO GAS STATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING MONDAY, MARCH 8, 2010 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 9, 2010 Mr. William Lahti, PE c/o Lahti Engineering 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Re: Close Hearing: Proposed Site Plan for the Valero Service Station Located at 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Zoning District: HB Dear Mr. Lahti: A public hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 8, 2010 regarding the above.referenced Site Plan. The public hearing was closed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts March 5, 2010 Overnight Mail Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SCTM#1000-102-5-26/Valero ~ 28975 Main Road, Cutchogue Dear Mr. Sidor: As required, my office posted the site and mailed the hearing notice to the adjacent property owners. Enclosed please find (5) original mailing receipts that are required by the Board. Five "green cards" and 1 original mailing receipt were submitted to your office yesterday. Sincerely, William J. L~iti, P.E. doc: 08043t08town,doc 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts March 4, 2010 Ms. Kfisty Winser Southold Town Hall 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Viao.vernightmail Re: Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 Dear Ms. Winser: . ' We are in receipt of your comments dated 1/27/10 summarizing c~mments made during the Planning Board work session. Enclosed, please find (9) copies of the modified site development plan. The Boards comments have been addressed as follows: Comment//4- The turning movements for the cars exiting the pump island on the side of the building have been illustrated on drawing SP-7. Please note the mining radius for the car on the western side of the island intersects the existing planter. However, the turning radius template used for the illustration is a conservative design, meaning that most cars, in reality, will not intersect the planter because their actual turning radius is less than the conservative template. Also, please bear in mind the following: The side island was installed for the purpose of relieving on-site congestion during peak periods. The side island will typically not be in use as all the petroleum products offered at the side island are offered on the main dispensing area in front of the station. Ifa car does use the side island and is unable to complete the turning maneuver when exiting the island, the car has sufficient room to back up and then complete the mining maneuver without any negative impact to the site operation. If the Board prefers, we can remove a section of the existing planter island and provide pavement to provide additional maneuvering room for cars exiting the west side of the side pump island. Comment #5- The revised floor plan has been provided and illustrates that the proposed convenience store will comply with the 800 SF limitation. Sincerely, 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts March 4, 2010 Overnight Mail Mr. Martin H. Sidor, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SCTM#1000-102-5-26/Valero ~ 28975 Main Road, Cutchogue Dear Mr. Sidor: As required, my office posted the site and mailed the hearing notice to the adjacem property owners. Enclosed please find the notarized affidavit as well as (5) return receipts and (1) original mailing receipt in lieu of the "green card" that has not yet been returned to my office. Sincerely, William J. L~nti, P.E. doc: 08043t07 town.doc AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as' Valero Service Station 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the~poster has remained in plac~forseven day. prior tothe date of the public hearing on March 8~ 2010 I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on R~ute 25 and Depot Lane William J. Lahti Your Name.(print) Signature 207 Hallock Rd Suite 212, Stony Brook NY 11790 Address March 4~ 2010 Date ~ hrotary Public JOHN V 80DERBE~ QIK~III~I In 8.f~lk ¢4.nly C,rml.ion F. xplr~ J, ne ~, PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVlT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 315/10 Re: Proposed Site Plan for the Valero Service Station SCTM#s: 1000-102-5-26 Date of Hearing: Monday, March 8, 2010, 6:20 p.m. CertlfJed Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endomement Rm:luired) 02/2t~/2010 · ~ Items 1, ~ and 3. Also complete Item4 If Re~tlcted ~3ellvery is desired. · Ptfllt y~Jr name and eddress on the reverse ~othat we can tatum the card to you. · AIl~h thts cad to the back of the mailpiece, ~pace permits. ¢, [] [] ~y(P~ntedNarne) D. Isdelive~jaddressdiffemntflomltem 171 [] if YES, enter delivery address below: [] 4, Restricted Deliver/? (Ext~ Fee) [] 2. ArflcleNumber 7009 3410 0001 3612 0188 . PS Form 3B19, Feb~ 20~ ~ ~ R~um R~ 1~ m ~p~ Re~ 1, 2, ~d 3. ~ ~pl~ ~ ~ J /~1~/~/~ · Pd~urn~e~add~onth~e~ ~ ~ u~ ~v so that we ~ ~urn the ~ to you. · A~ch this ~ to ~e back of the m~lpi~e, or on the ~ D, Is daiNmy address different fT~ item 1 ? If YES, enter daih~ addm~ below: 3. Service Type ~t~C.,e~tlfled Mail [] Express Mail [] Registered ~ Retum Receipt for tv [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4, R ,estr~ed Delive~ ~ Fee) [] 2. A rticleNumber 7009 3410 0001 3612 0232 ~ PS Form 381 1, February 2~104 Domestic Retum Receipt 10~s ~ ~ Item 4 If Reebleted Del;vely Is de~lmd. X ~ 03/03/2010 15:40 FAX 631 765 4643 MOORE LAW OFFICES PATRICIA C. MOORE AtXorney St Law 51020 Main R.oad Southold, New York 11971 To: (63) 765-4330 Fax: (631) ?65-4643 Planning Board ~001 March 3, 2010 Attn: Martin Sidor, Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: Valero Service Station SCTM: 1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Sidor and Board members: With reference to the above, please be advised that I have been retained to assist the engineers on this project and respectfully request that you copy me on. all correspondence and keep me advised. *]'hank you and please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions. .tr.u -w urs, '-- -Patfi~ia C. Moore PCM/bp MAR-3 2010 li!~! #9661 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for ! week(s), s,uccessively, commencing on the 25th day of FebruaryI 2010. Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this Town ot South~ld, ~ ~J~l~e~e ~ ~ be held by the Southol~ Town Plaffni~ Board, at the To~ ~a,, ~ain R0~ M~ ~10 6n ~h~ quesaTM ~"$fi: ~f ~ t6~ approved map, NOTARY pUBLIC-SlATE OF NEW yORK No. 0t.vO6t 05050 QuaBfied in Suffolk County My commission Expires Feb~ua[V 28, 2012 CR 48, in County Suffolk Count 59-3~17.3 6~05 at Southold, Number 1000~3-1-12 6:10 p.m. Pr,op~ ~g~7~ divigion w/o Bay~ ~ne, ~ Soutbold; To~ of Southold, Coudty~ ~ S~o~;' of New York. Suffolk ~u~ty ~ Mfi~ Road, on ~e s/s/~ ~o~d. appmxi-~ 6:20 p,m. Propo~ Site P~ for ~e ~ Road, on ~e ~w ~rn~r of Ma~~ Dated: ~17/10 #9661 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successively, commencing on the 25th day of February, 2010. ~dncipal Glerk Sworn to before me this ToWn -of South6!a, a p~lig~at~g%~:. be hbtd by the Southol8 T6wn Planh fig Board. at the Town FIMI, Ma~n R0hd;: Southol~d l~w Yor~;OU~th~'8th~ ~f~ Mare~i 2016 on the quest on of tlie '~ol- 6:00 p.m. Proposed ~i~'l~ ~ fi~ ~h~ ~ · CHRISTINA VOLINSKI NOTARY PUBLIC-SlATE OF NEW YORK No. 01.VO6105050 Qualified in Suffolk County th~ n/e/s/o Kenn3 CR 48, in Southold, ~ at 6!$0 p.m~ Propqsed~[~dar4~&Ub; ~ion the ~/s/O CR:,~ r of S~uth01d/ C0ufi~y 6f Suffol~;'S~ Nu~r~i~5242:ll,, ~i5 ¢.mi~i~'~te:p~a. for Rag ph~e! Vin¢~r~, 39390 Rqad,,pn the ~S/9~M~oad, appr6xlc~ :~iie;tT~ ~f~uthOld; County 6~ 6:20 p.m. ~oPO~d Site~P!an for the; ~ R0ad; on the ~w miner of Mah ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at.the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 8th day of March, 2010 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed amendment to the approved map of the Major Subdivision of Papadopoulos & Maragos located on the n/e/s/o Kenny's Road, 705.05' n/w/o CR 48, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-59-3- 17.3 6:05 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision for Karen Mazzaferro located at 1450 Horton's Lane, on the e/s/o Horton's Lane, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-63-1-12 6:10 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision for Nickart Realty located on the s/s/o CR 48, approximately 900' w/o Bayberry Lane, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-52-2-13 6:15 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for Raphael Vineyards located at 39390 Main Road, on the s/s/o Main Road, approximately 520' w/o Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000~85-3-11.3 & 11.4 6:20 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for the Valero Service Station located at 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County '['.ax Map Number 1000-102-5-26 Dated: 2/17/10 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2010 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times Page 1 of 1 Kalin, Carol From: Candice Schott [legals@timesreview.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 9:45 AM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: RE: legal ad for 2/25/10 edition of the Suffolk Times Hi Carol, I have received the legal notice and we are good to go for the 2/25 issue. Thanks and have a great Wednesday!! Candice From: Kalin, Carol [mailto:CaroI.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Wednesday, February :[7, 2010 9:15 AM To: Legals Subject: legal ad for 2/25/10 edition of the Suffolk Times Please print the attached legal ad regarding the 3/8 Planning Bd. Public Hearings (Papadopoulos & Maragos, Mazzaferro, Valero, Raphael Vineyards & Nickart Realty) in the February 25th edition of the Suffolk Times. An e-mail confirmation of receipt would be appreciated. Thank you. Carol Kalin, Secretarial Assistant Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Annex, 54375 NYS Rt. 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (63 I)765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Carol. Kalin~town.southold.ny.us 2/17/2010 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 8th day of March, 20t0 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed amendment to the approved map of the Major Subdivision of Papadopoulos & Maragos located on the nle/s/o Kenny's Road, 705.05' n/w/o CR 48, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-59-3- 17.3 6:05 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision for Karen Mazzaferro located at 1450 Horton's Lane, on the e/s/o Horton's Lane, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-63-1-12 6:10 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision for Nickart Realty located on the s/s/o CR 48, approximately 900' w/o Bayberry Lane, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-52-2-13 6:15 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for Raphael Vineyards located at 39390 Main Road, on the s/s/o Main Road, approximately 520' w/o Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-85-3-11.3 & 11.4 6:20 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for the Valero Service Station located at 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-102-5-26 Dated: 2/17/10 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sider Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 17th day of February, 2010 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall~ 53095 Main Road, Southold~ New York 3/8/10 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. 6:05 p.m. 6:10 p.m. 6:15 p.m. 6:20 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed amendment to the approved map for the Major Subdivision of Papadopoulos & Maragos for George Penny IV, SCTM#1000-59-3-17.3 Public Hearing for the proposed Standard Subdivision of Karen Mazzaferro, SCTM#1000-63-1-12 Public Hearing for the proposed Standard Subdivision for Nickart Realty, SCTM#1000-52-2-13 Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Raphael Vineyards, SCTM#1000-85-3-11.3 & 11.4 Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for the Valero Service Station, SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this /r~'~day of [~'~.oA~"[ , 2010, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 February 9, 2010 Mr. William Lahti, PE cio Lahti Engineering 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Re: Set Hearing: Proposed Site Plan for the Valero Service Station Located at 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Zoning District: HB Dear Mr. Lahti: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, February 8, 2010: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, March 8, 2010 at 6:20 p.m. for a public hearing regarding the site plan prepared by William J. Lahti, P.E., dated October 20, 2008 and last revised December 5, 2009. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of PostinR along with the certified mailin~ receiots AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, March 5m. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planninq Board Office after the public hearing. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encls. Southold Town PlanninR Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-102-5-26; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the Hamlet Business Zoning District; That the application is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a 1,206 s.f. convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot located at 28975 Main Road, on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, in Cutchogue; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2nd FI., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. Information can also be obtained via the internet by sending an e-mail message to: Carol. Kalin@town.southold.ny.us; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, March 8, 2010 at 6:20 p.m. in the MeetinR Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: 808 Realty Corp.Nalero Service Station Date: 2/17/10 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon~ Fri., 3/5/10 Re: Proposed Site Plan for the Valero Service Station SCTM#s: 1000-102-5-26 Date of Hearing: Monda¥~ March 8, 2010~ 6:20 p.m. Town of $outhold PC/Codebook for Windows § $5-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L. No. 12-2003] Whenever the Code calls for a public heating this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application or petition is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public heating thereon. Notice relating to a public hearing on an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A. Town responsibility for publication ofnotice. The reviewing board or commission shallcause a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiated, proposed or requested by an applicant or petitioner, other than a Town board or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, giving notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than 10 feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant, petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall include description of the street location and area of the subject property, nature of relief or approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant, petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public heating. 808 REALTY CORP. VALERO SERVIC 1000-102-5-26 STATION SITE PLAN eMONDAY- MARCH 8, 2009 - 6:20 P.M. Proposed conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a 1,206 s.f. convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. 9.1 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, February 1, 2010 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications Descr pt on: i This site plan is for the proposed construction of an 18,000 sq. ft. I meeting/conference facility and interior alterations of an existing motel, i restaurant, pool and pool house on a conforming 12.3 acre site partially located Status ~ Site Plan Review Action: i Consider Final Al~p_roval and review draft resolution. ' .~t~C~ _m_e_ ~t_sL L.~r a_ft?_.e_ S~O I_u_t i_o__n. ................................................................................................. .pr. oj~ .c_t _na~_~e_[ .................. Valero Service stat,on L.s_C_TM#:_L 1000-_102~-_5-2___6 Location: on the n/w corner of Main Road and Del~ot Lane Cutc~o~.ue Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and ~ gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on i an 18 473 sg~ ft lot in the Hamlet Business Zonin District Status: i New Site Plan ' _A_ttacb _m_er~.S.; ..................... D mff R e_s.~!.u_tjg, n. ............................................................................................................................ Project name: ] SCTM#: I 85. -3-11.4 & 11.3 Raphael Vineyards 2009 ~ ~ Location: ................................... Lc ....................................................................... Descr pt on: This amended site plan is for the construction of a 6,244 sq. f~.~ ~"~J'-~i~"~ ~ building on a previously developed and approved 50.4-acre parcel in the ~ Agricultural Conservation Zonin~ District ~ New Site Plan ! Action: ~ Setoub chearna Feb 8 2010forMat 8 2010 Attachments: ~ Draft Resolution Locat on , W ckham Avenue Mattituck ................ :-.~ ................ ! .............. : ............................................................................................................ Descr I~t~on: i expansion of boat storaoe and off ces Status: i The app..roved site lan was extended to Februa 9, 2010 Attachments: ] Draft Resolution ] '-~rgj~i na'rn~. .... ' Ba'tt~9"iia J0seP_'~-["Fi~i"~l-i~ .................... [-sdYM'~':''"~' 1b~d-64-3-3 Location: on the west side of Hoba~ Road, approximately 1,059 feet no~h from Ter~ L Lane Southold 'Oneis4~280s~ fl andLotTwo s54074s fl ntheR~0Zonn Dstrct Status: ~ Conditional Sketch Action: [ 5~ach~.~s.~ j. Prop~..~.~.~e M.~p~[a~ Res~l~i0p February l, 2010 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 2S0 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 www.nysdot.gov Mr. William J. Lahti, P.E Lahti Engineering, PC 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Your December 7, 2009 Submission Valero Service Station Route 25, Cutcho~ue SCTM 1000-10200-0500-026000 Our Case No. 09-053P Dear Mr. Lahti: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work within New York State highway right-of-way and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the tbllowing items must be addressed: In recent years, many states have employed access management as a major technique to address conflicts between through traffic and that generated by developments. The goals of access management are to limit the number of access points, separate conflict points and remove turning traffic from through movements. New York State is utilizing this technique to minimize impacts to State highways. We recommend, therefore, that cross access to this site be obtained from adjacent property. If this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. We note your response regarding this matter but we do maintain our recommendation. Future cross access should be considered at this site. Site plan approval for highway work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and that no further revisions are made to the plans once we approve them. Mr. William J. Lahti February 1. 2010 Page 2 of 2 If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. Kindly submit three (3) sets of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Also enclosed is a Highway Work Permit Application to be completed and returned to us. The same party must secure the application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond. All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $200.00 Bond Amount: $10,000.00 Insurance Fee: $150.00 or Perm 17 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer iii Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachments: Perm 17, Perm 33, Perm 44 cc: M~. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold VMs. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner, Town of Southold Mr. Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf Page I of 1 Winser, Kristy From: Fisher, Robert Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:06 AM To: Winser, Kdsty Subject: Valero, Cutchogue Kristy Comments from Cutchogue Fire District about the Valero Gas Station corner of Depot Land & Route 25 1. Site plan eliminates the ability to have emergency vehicles drive around the building. 2. Traffic pattern to the second set of pumps is severely hampered by location of parking on the west side eliminating the drive around capability. 3. Dumpster location could make accessibility in an emergency difficult due to traffic patterns. The north corner of the building would be a more accessible location. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Any questions please contact me. Bob Robert Fisher Fire Inspector robert.fisher@town .sou[hold.ny.us 1/28/2010 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN II. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPII L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Younffs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 January 27, 2010 William Lahti, P.E. c/o Lahti Engineering 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Re: Site Plan for Valero Service Station SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Lahti: I'm writing as a follow up to the Planning Board Work Session held on January 19, 2010 whereas, the status of above-referenced site pian was discussed and the following actions were taken. Please revise in accordance with the following comments and re-submit directly to the Planning Department: Staff distributed the traffic analysis submitted on December 28, 2009 in connection with your revised site plans to the Planning Board and they agreed to forward the same to the Southold Town Transportation Commission for comment. 2. Your revised site plans will be forwarded to the Cutchogue Fire District for Comment as previously discussed at the June 15, 2009 Work session. 3. The Planning Board agreed to set the Public hearing at the February 8, 2009 Work Session for the March 8, 2009 Public Hearing. The Planning Board requested that the applicant demonstrate the turning movements of cars exiting the diesel pump stations. For your convenience, this may be demonstrated on a separate plan for the Boards consideration. As per the amendments made to the convenience store legislation, please submit a floor plan for review that meets the Maximum gross floor area of the retail area of the retail store that equals 800 sq. feet or less including storage and counter area. Site plan review for Valero service station, Cutchogue p?¸ It should be noted that Staff, the Town Planning Board, Town departments involved/interested agencies might provide additional comments following full review. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours truly, Kristy Winser Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director and PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Bob Fisher, Southold Town Fire Inspector Cutchogue Fire District From: Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner ~ Date: January 23, 2010 Re: Site plan for Valero Service Station, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Thc enclosed site plan application, referenced above, is being referred to you for your comment on matters of interest to the fire department, including fire department equipment access, emergency services, and any other issue that may be of concern or relevance to this application. Please respond with your recommendations at your earliest convenience. Project Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. fl. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. This site is located on the n/w comer of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue. Please contact me at (631)765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Southold Town Building Department* Southold Town Transportation Commission** From: Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner Date: January 23, 2010 Re: Site plan for Valero Service Station,Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102~5-26 The Planning Board refers the above referenced site plan to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. The file is available at your convenience. Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing 1,206 sq. fi. automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. fi. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District located on the n/w comer of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue. Thank you for your cooperation. *Encls: Site plan ** Traffic Analysis WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Tuesday, January 19, 2010 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications Location: on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service ~ station on an 18 473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. ACti°n: i ReveW m~ Sed S te'p an'and app cants subm ssion, including a traffic i analysis. Review applicant's request to the County to re-consider their :: !; origins! m~omm~nd~i~n t0 d~ny U~e p[oj~t: Attachments: Staff Report, Traffic Analysis, and applicant's letter addressed to the County with the response from the County: ~i~ject name Matt,ATMar Mar na i SCTM# i 1000-11473;! Locat on W ckham Avenue Mattituck Descdpt on expans 0n 0f boat storag~ and offices Status: The app[0ved site plan was extended to.February. 9 20~0.~ Action: The applicant requests an extension of time for the architect to complete Attachments: Request from Applicant Project name: Zuckerberg Lloyd P. i SCTM#: 1000-86-1-10.9 Location: southwest corner of Wells Road and State Route 25 in Peconic 65,562 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 77,694 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 29.5416 acres and is proposed to be preserved through a Sale of Development Rights t0 the.'F0wn of Southold Status: Sketch ApproYa! Action: Discuss rant of draina e easement to Town b a licant g g Y PP ~ Attachments: Project name Mazzaferro Karen i SCTM#: 1000-63-1-12 Location on the east side of Horton's Lane in Southold Description: This proposed standard subdivision is to subdivide a 4.28-acre parcel ~ into 3 mots, where Lot 1 equals 41,994 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 43,631 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equa!s 90, 023 sq. f~ in t!3e R;40 ~on!ng District. Status; ~Sketch Ap.p[o~a! Actionl i Review Town Engineer Comments. Attachments: ;~ Staff ReportJEqg neer Comments 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631 ) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts December 22, 2009 Ms. Kristy Winser Southold Town Hall 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Via ovemi~.ht mail Re: Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 We have been notified by the Suffolk County Planning Commission (copy attached) that all filings must be submitted from the municipality. As such, enclosed please find our submittal package for the Suffolk County Planning Commission. A copy of the package was already carbon copied to your office on 12/7/09. Please prepare the necessary cover letter and file our package with the SCPC. Thank you. Sincerely, Wi~ll~am j/~. L 'di,~ Og0430134Tox~a Plt DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE THOMAS A. ISLES, A.I.C.P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING December 15, 2009 William J. Lahti, P.E. LAHTI Engineering & Environmental Consulting 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, New York 11790 Re: S.C.T.M. No.: S.C.P.C. Rile No.: Valero ~ 28975 Rte. 25, Cutchogue I000 10200 0500 026000 SD-09-04 Dear Mr. Lahti: in accordance with the Suffolk County Planning Commission Policy, the attached information will not be accepted unless forwarded by the local referring municipality. The information must be accompanied with a letter describing such contents, as well as instructions for disregarding previously submitted material. This policy was instituted to avoid confusion as to which map should be reviewed by the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Section 3.9 and 3.10 of the Suffolk County Planning Commission Guidebook (http://www.suffolkcountyny.gov/upload/planning/pdfs2/ scplanning_com/2009~df/scpcguidebk2009.pdf) indicates the Commission Policy on re-consideration of referred matters. The re-referral must come from the Local Municipality. Please note that pursuant to the Suffolk County Administrative Code Section AI4-25D.(3) that the Suffolk County Planning Commission is an advisory body to the local municipality and may be overruled in their determination. Very truly yours, Thomas A. Isles, AICP Chief Planner APF:ds cc: Kristy Winser, Town of Southold Planning Dept. Enc. LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. -4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631 ) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts December 7, 2009 Via overnight mail Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, Chief Planner Suffolk County Planning Commission H. Lee Dennison Bldg.-4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway, P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: SCPC File No.: SD-09-04 Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 Dear Ms. Freleng: The Planning Commission considered the above referenced project at the April 1, 2009 meeting. The Board recommended disapproval of the proposal. By way of this submittal, we are requesting that the Commission reconsider the application as their original decision was based on inaccurate or incomplete information. Three specific reasons were cited for the disapproval: 1. Unwarranted over-intensification of the use 2. Tends to diminish the safety and traffic carrying capacity of the New York State Route 25 3. Site plan design of the proposed multiple use is a poor configuration Enclosed please find an updated set of site development plans. In addition, enclosed please find a Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated 9/24/09. I would like to address the Commission's reasons for disapproval. Unwarranted over-intensification of use- ao It is not unwarranted. The owners of the property are trying to ensure that the business remains financially solvent, continues to efficiently and safely serve its patrons, and continues to contribute to the tax base. b. The service station use already exists. The proposed additional pump island on the side of the building is for the purpose of providing additional pumping capacity during peak periods. Having the additional fueling position allows the operator to fuel more vehicles and alleviate any congestion that builds on site. Page 2 S.C. Planning Commission. re: Valero Service Station, Cutchogue 12/7/09 c. The proposed convenience store use is in exchange for giving up the repair garage use. The number of uses on site remains unchanged. As stated in the TIA by Dunn, the convenience store use in this setting does not add any appreciable amount of trip ends. Convenience store customers are typically already on-site to purchase fuel. Tends to diminish the safety and traffic carrying capacity of the New York State Route 25- As stated in the TIA, the addition of the side pump island and conversion of the repair garage to a small sized convenience store will have no appreciable effect on the trip generation rate for this site. ii. With regard to impacting NYS Route 25 with the vehicle que, drawing SP-7 demonstrates that the site conforms to the Town's requirement of 3 cars per pump. Site plan desitin of the proposed multiple use is a poor configuration- While the site design may not be optimal, it is completely functional and conforms to the Town's requirement for parking and vehicle queing while maintaining the existing on- site infrastructure. · As stated in the TIA, vehicles using the proposed pump island on the side of the building are able to make the turning maneuver necessary to get back to Main Rd. · The proposed parking stalls are out of the main traffic path for the petroleum filling operation. · The east to west on-site traffic flow enacted at the request of the NYSDOT will aid in efficient circulation. Miscellaneous Comments Made During Commission Meeting- There were numerous comments made during the meeting that require clarification and/or correction; 1) The curbcuts on Main Road are not unrestricted. In accordance with comments received from the NYSDOT, the eastern most curbcut shall be ingress only and the western most shall be egress only. 2) The location of the proposed parking stalls does not place pedestrians at an increased risk. The stalls are out of the main traffic circulation path. The patrons can reach the store sidewalk without having to cross the main vehicle traffic path. 3) The statement was made regarding the pedestrians "...they're going to have to watch out for cars moving in and out of the site..." and "... pedestrians are and motor vehicles are going to have to negotiate with each other." Of course they will. That is tree of every parking lot in the world. That is not an issue specific to this site or the proposed uses. 4) Please be advised that the facility owner did have an approved Town of Southold permit to construct the pump island on the side of the building. It was not until the fire marshal Page 3 S.C. Planning C~ommission. re: Valero Service Station, ~utchogue 12/7/09 made a final inspection that the Town inspector realized the addition of a pump island required a Town site plan review. 5) The pump on the side of the building dispenses gasoline and diesel fuel. As previously stated, it is anticipated that the pump will only be used during peak periods when additional pumping capacity is necessary to efficiently handle the on-site traffic volume. 6) With regard to the building, the owners wanted to make the building more visually appealing. Since the site was going to be out of operation for several months while the new underground tank system was installed, they opted to rehab the building. If you go into the building you will see that it is empty, except for the customer service area (which previously existed), utility room and restroom. A convenience store was not constructed. The existing building was simply renovated in anticipation of adding a small retail area where the repair bays used to be. 7) As you know, NYS Route 25 is under the State's jurisdiction. The NYSDOT issued comments and we addressed all of them. 8) Shifting the curbcut on Depot Lane 10 feet, which is the most you can do given the required Town buffer area and existing underground tank installation, will not add any queing capacity for cars on Depot Lane waiting to make a left turn onto NYS Route 25. 9) The pumps under the existing canopy have been there. They were changed as part of the underground tank project, but the new pumps were installed in the same locations as the previous pumps. 10) As demonstrated by the Traffic Impact Assessment, the proposed additional pump island and conversion of the repair garage to a small convenience store does not have any appreciable effect on the trip generation rate for this site. The proposed improvements do allow the operator to handle peak fueling periods much more efficiently and supplement the income stream via convenience item sales to fuel patrons. I, and the site owner, would be more than happy to meet with the Commission and/or staff to answer any questions you may have. Please notify my office of the action taken on our request for re-consideration. Thank you. Sincerely, . ' · . allt~P.E. cc: Ms. Kristy Winser- Town of Southold Planning Dept. w/o encl. doc: 08043s0! sc planning September 24, 2009 Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. LAHTI Engineering 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, New York 11790 Re~ Traffic Impact Assessment Valero Gas and Convenience Store NYS Route 25 Cutchogue, New York Dear Mr. Lahti: In accordance with your request, we have prepared this Traffic Impact Assessment which contains the results of a traffic engineering evaluation of the redevelopment of an existing gasoline and automotive service station on NYS Route 25 (Main Road) in Cutchogue. This evaluation focuses on the traffic effects of the addition a new pump island and the conversion of building area from automotive service bays to a convenience store. The new pump island contains two fueling positions (one on either side). The station currently has a single pump island with four fueling positions. The proposed change would allow for simultaneous fueling of six vehicles rather than the existing four. Location, Existing Roadway and Access Conditions The site is located on the northwest comer of Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Depot Lane within the hamlet of Cutchogue and the Township of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Main Road is a major east/west state facility which provides one lane in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its intersection with Depot Lane, an eastbound left turn lane is provided which extends part way across the site's frontage and can be used for left tums into the site. The speed limit on Main Road in the vicinity of the site is 35 miles per hour. Depot Lane is a north/south local town roadway which intersects Main Road to form a "T" intersection and extends north. Depot Lane provides one lane in each direction and is stop- controlled at its intersection with Main Road. Currently, access is provided to the site via three driveways. Two driveways are located on Main Road and one driveway on Depot Lane. Full movements are currently permitted at all three driveway locations. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 2 Main Road and Depot Lane are basically flat and straight in the vicinity of the site. As such, there are no impediments to adequate sight distance to vehicles entering and exiting the site. It is notable that directly adjacent to the west is a 7-Eleven convenience store. This store is larger than that proposed on the Valero site. The 7-Eleven store does not sell gasoline. Existing traffic volumes, in the form of New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) automated traffic recorder (ATR) counts, were obtained for Main Road and are included as Attachment A to this letter. These counts indicate that the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on this section of NYS Route 25 was 11,350 vehicles per day in 2002. Main Road exhibits typical weekday AM and PM peak period commuter traffic peaks. However, it is also notable that given the nature of the area, seasonal variations in traffic patterns also exist due to the recreational opportunities on the North Fork of Long Island. This is evident in higher levels of traffic outside winter months with weekend peak traffic often exceeding weekday levels. Existing Site Trip Generation To document the existing site driveway volumes, manual counts of entering and exiting vehicles were conducted. These counts were performed on Wednesday July 22nd, Thursday July 23rd and Saturday July 25th, 2009. Driveway entering and exiting volumes were recorded during the weekday AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 PM), the weekday PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) and the Saturday peak midday period (10:00 AM to 2:00 PM). The complete details of these counts are included in Attachment B to the letter. The peak hour combined driveway volumes found are summarized in Table 1, below. Weekday AM Peak 53 51 104 Weekday PM Peak 41 38 79 Saturday Midday Peak 69 58 127 Table 1 Counted Driveway Volumes The peak combined driveway volume occurred during the peak hour on Saturday (10:30 AM 11:30 AM), when a total of 127 trips were recorded. This value includes 69 entering and 58 exiting trips. It should be noted that these counts reflect the operation of the station without the new pump island or convenience store in operation. In addition, the previous auto repair activity is also absent. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 3 Patron traffic activity at gasoline filling stations involves, almost exclusively, vehicles that are already on the roadway. They are not new trips generated by the use but what is considered a secondary or pass-by trip that occurs as part of an existing primary trip to another destination. As such, while there are driveway volumes present, the volume on the surrounding roadways does not increase measurably due to the presence of the use. This aspect of trip-making as it relates to gasoline sales as well as convenience stores is discussed in more detail later in this report. Addition of Pump Island The addition of a pump island at the station will provide for two additional fueling positions, bringing the total number of fueling positions to six. This will allow for simultaneous servicing of six vehicles rather than the existing four. This will allow for decreased vehicle queuing at the existing pumps during peak periods which occasionally impedes site circulation. Based on the trip generating characteristics of gasoline sales, this addition is not expected to result in any significant increase in the number of vehicles visiting the site, as discussed below. Gasoline sales is an operation driven to a very large extent by convenience. Trips for gasoline are rarely made as a primary trip or as a trips main purpose. Drivers stop for gas as part of another trip. Very rarely would a driver leave home for instance, travel to solely get gasoline and then return home. The vast majority of trips for gas originates from the passing traffic stream and are not new trips. As such, the driveway volumes seen at gasoline stations are most directly related to the volumes on the adjacent roadway(s) and not the number of pumping stations. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication "Trip Generation" contains data on trip generating characteristics for gasoline stations based on either the number of fueling positions or the peak volumes passing the site. This data indicates, based on curve fitting, that the traffic passing a site is a better predictor of driveway volumes than the number of pumping stations. With the addition of the pump island alone, driveway volumes are not anticipated to increase any significant degree, if at all. Dunn Engineering Associates (DEA) performed a customer survey in the early 1990's in which customers to existing gasoline service stations with convenience store in Suffolk County were interviewed regarding the nature of their trip. This involved interviews with over 200 persons on a weekday and a Saturday regarding a) the purpose of their trip, b) the route they selected, and c) the types of purchases they made. The results of this study are summarized in Table 2 below. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 4 q. What is tho purpose of your trip: a) Work 79 19 b) Shopping 5 39 c) Recreation/Social 4 28 d) School 3 0 e) Service Station Only 1 0 f) Other 9 14 2. How did you get to this service station: a) Usually drive by 87 81 b) Made a route change (detour) to get there ~i3 19 3. Did you/will you buy: a) Gas only 56 70 b) Convenience Store item(s) only 15 15 c) Both 29 15 Table 2 Service Station Study The results of the study confirm that almost no one (less than 1%) made a trip to the service station as their sole purpose. In addition, an average of 84% of site visitors were on the adjacent roadway already passing the site. This data confirms two things. First, the vast majority of trips to a site such as the one in question are not new. This reinforces the fact that these uses do not generate significant levels of new trips and that their driveway volumes do not significantly add to overall traffic levels in the area. Second, this data supports the fact that the driveway volumes to a gas station site such as this are directly related to volumes on the adjacent roadway. The addition of a pump island with two fueling positions will not of itself have any significant effect on driveway volumes or volumes on the surrounding roadways. Proposed Convenience Store The operator of the station is seeking approval to operate a convenience store in the 1,200 square foot building which formerly housed the site office, a smaller amount of retail space and an auto repair operation. The development of projections of trip increases as a result of this change is not straightforward. The trips that would have been attributable to the auto repair activity were not captured in the driveway counts as that business was not operating when the counts were taken. In addition, the sites location directly adjacent to a larger national chain convenience store will affect patron draw to the proposed convenience store. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 5 The data collected during the course of the DEA survey also indicates two things regarding trips to convenience stores on gas station sites. Like gasoline sales, the vast majority of the trips involving the convenience store, were already on the roadway and are not new-trips but pass-by trips. Also, the majority of patrons using the convenience store are already on site purchasing gasoline. In regard to trips reduced by elimination of the automobile repair operation, the ITE Trip Generation publication does contain some information on the trip making activity at what is referred to as Auto Care Centers. However, the data is limited and the sites studied to develop the data averaged 12,000 square feet in size, or ten times the size of the building in question. It is apparent however that a fairly low level of trips would have been generated by this small auto repair shop; perhaps only 3 to 5 per hour. What can be said of these trips, however, is that these would have been new trips on the roadway, not pass-by trips as are the trips for gasoline and to the convenience store. The DEA customer survey data indicates that most customers patronizing the convenience store were already on the site purchasing gasoline. To determine what increase in driveway volumes can be expected by the introduction of the convenience store, the DEA customer survey data introduced previously in Table 1 is utilized. Looking at Table 1, question 3 gives an indication as to what portion of visits to the site will be for the convenience store only. On a weekday the data indicates that 15 trips would be made to the convenience store in isolation compared to 85 involving gasoline sales. This translates to a 17.6% potential increase. On a Saturday, the convenience store only visit ratio is the same. Therefore, it can be deduced that the site would see a 17.6% increase in driveway volumes, if the adjacent 7-11 were not present. Table 3, below, presents the existing driveway volumes, the projected driveway volumes and the gross change. These projections include no adjustment for the presence of the adjacent 7-Eleven store. Weekday AM 53 51 104 Existing Weekday PM 41 38 79 Saturday Midday 69 58 127 Weekday AM 62 60 122 Proposed Weekday PM 48 45 93 Saturday Midday 81 68 149 Gross Change Weekday AM +9 +9 +18 Weekday PM +7 +7 +14 (Driveway Volume) Saturday Midday +12 +10 +22 Net Change Weekday AM +2 +2 +4 Weekday PM +1 +1 +2 (New Traffic on Roadway) Saturday Midday +2 +2 +4 Table 3 Projected Proposed Peak Driveway Volumes Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 6 The gross change reflects increases in driveway volumes, not increases in volume on adjacent streets. Still, increases are less than one trip every two minutes on Saturday during the peak period and less at other times. In terms of new trips on the roadways, we know from the DEA survey that 84% of visits to the site will already be on the road passing the site. Therefore, the projected new traffic on the adjacent roadways, shown as the Net Change in Table 3, does not exceed 4 vehicle trips per hour at peak times. The presence of the adjacent 7-11 is likely to reduce the number of convenience store only visits to the site below even that presented in Table 3. Motorists wishing to stop for convenience items without purchasing gas would be more inclined to patronize the larger, more recognizable store. The increases in Table 3 are therefore likely high. The net change in traffic (increases in volume on the adjacent streets) does not take this factor, nor the elimination of trips due to the automobile repair operation into account. Given the very small net traffic increases in Table 3 (maximum of 4 trips in the peak hour) it is likely that the elimination of auto repair trips and the proximity to 7-11 would cancel out any increase entirely. Site Circulation Two aspects of the sites redevelopment will affect existing site circulation. The construction of the new pump island will require fueling vehicles to navigate a portion of the site previously not actively used. In addition, the NYSDOT has recommended that each of the two access drives on Main Road be restricted to one-way movements. To determine the ability of vehicles to access and depart the new pump island a field circulation test was performed. In this test a full size, extended cab, dual wheel pickup track was utilized to test the geometry. The track was able to access and egress both sides of the new pump island without difficulty. The presence of the new pump island will reduce vehicle queuing on the site at the existing pumps during peak periods of activity, improving site circulation by reducing congestion there. It is noted however, that the presence of fueling vehicles at the new pump island, may obstruct, to a degree, the two easternmost parking stalls proposed west of the building. It is therefore recommended that employees use these stalls to limit stall turnover and potential interference. The NYSDOT has recommended that the easterly driveway be signed for entering vehicles only and that the westerly driveway be signed for exiting vehicles only. Given the location of the site on the comer of Depot Lane and the presence and length of the left turn lane on Main Road, these changes are appropriate. The restriction of turning movements at access points along a roadway is a standard access management practice which has been shown to improve traffic flow and safety. Entering vehicles being restricted to the easterly driveway (or Depot Lane) ensures use of the left turn storage lane, ensuring less disruption to thru traffic on Main Road. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 7 The NYSDOT has also requested that the potential for cross access to and from the adjacent 7- Eleven site be explored. This cross access would, if provided, serve no benefit to the gas station site but allow 7-Eleven patrons direct access to Depot Lane. While cross access arrangements under the right circumstances can serve as a positive measure to reduce trips on the adjacent roadway, (in this case Main Road), it is not recommended in this instance. The gas station site, as existing and proposed, does not have a dedicated thru traffic aisle which could easily handle the traffic through the site due to the 7-Eleven. While the site will adequately handle gas sales and convenience store patrons, it is not laid out for cross access traffic which would, due to driver behavior, be moving at significantly higher speeds. With the restriction of driveway movements as recommended by the NYSDOT the site will have a generally east to west traffic pattern. This is counter to and in conflict with vehicles that would be leaving 7-Eleven to Depot Lane. For circulation and safety reasons, it is recommended that cross access not be implemented at this time. It is also noted that cross access may lead to additional 7-Eleven traffic utilizing Depot Lane. Conclusions Based on the above analysis, it is clear that the redevelopment of the site as proposed will not have any significant detrimental effect on traffic conditions in the area. In support of this conclusion we state the following: The best predictor of site traffic levels for a gasoline station is not the number of pumps but the level of traffic on the adjacent streets. The addition of a pump island with two fueling stations positions will not result in any significant increases in site volumes. The presence of the new pump island will result in a reduction in vehicle queuing at the existing pumps during peak periods of activity, improving site circulation by reducing congestion. Field circulation tests performed indicate that both sides of the new pump island can be accessed and egressed by large vehicles without difficulty. The two stalls closest to this island should be used by employees as they may be blocked partially by fueling vehicles. The vast majority of trips to gasoline stations with convenience stores involve gasoline sales. The addition of the convenience store will result in small increases in driveway volume on the order of one trip every two minutes at peak. The increases in driveway volumes come in large part from the passing traffic stream and are not new trips. The very small volume of new trips due to the convenience store will likely be canceled out by the elimination of trips to the former auto repair use. The presence of the adjacent 7-Eleven store is likely to reduce the number of convenience store only trips to this site as patrons will chose the larger, more recognizable store. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 8 9. The left turn lane on Main Road that can be used to enter the site ensures that the site's operation will not affect traffic flow on Main Road. Implementation of the NYSDOT's recommendation to restrict entering vehicles to the easterly driveway ensures its use. 10. It is recommended that the cross access to the adjacent 7-Eleven not be implemented at this time. The current and proposed layout of the gas station site does not support thru traffic and the cross access will detract from site circulation as well as safety. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me. Patrick Lenihan, P.E. Associate Engineer PL:as L209237 P29080 Att. ATTACHMENT A RC/STATION 070049 New York State Department of Transportation COVERAGE AND SPECIAL COUNT HOURLY REPORT PGM VERSION ST. TOURING RTE: 25 ROAD NAME: RT 25 MILEPOINT 0415990 NHS 9 COUNTY: SUFFOLK SECTION FROM: N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO: TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD TOWN: SOUTHOLD FEDERAL DIR. 3 FACTOR GRP 40 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 06 HPMS NUMBER: BIN NUMBER: COUNT DATE: 6120/2 WEEK OF YR 25 RECORDER PLACEMENT: NOTES: EB RT 25 TUBE COUNT REFERENCE MKR: RECORDER SERIAL#: 3597 ADDITIONAL DATA: 3.5/ 40 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO DY D D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DAY HI HI MO W R AM PM TOTAL COUNT HOUR 20 4 I 492 547 580 533 519 843 522 436 366 292 270 216 166 75 21 5 I 58 16 6 10 7 59 178 337 482 439 550 631 738 674 483 639 626 625 434 436 355 266 182 I37 8368 738 13 22 6 1 94 38 18 10 18 49 161 254 394 486 622 692 684 643 622 737 514 531 461 387 351 309 188 127 8390 737 16 23 7 1 81 41 28 22 12 31 131 157 258 418 830 607 661 579 576 483 450 424 286 240 211 182 115 74 6597 661 13 24 I 1 54 25 9 5 16 55 179 300 418 418 527 500 627 508 491 488 480 436 383 264 241 196 117 66 6803 627 13 25 2 1 39 17 7 7 12 45 184 325 (~' 475 531 603 631 565 528 5(]5 525 462 362 290 251 213 132 61 7211 631 13 26 3 1 36 19 10 10 20 62 183 315 438 457 539 524 584 616 568 610 602 449 485 288 319 273 249 109 7765 616 14 27 4 I 58 33 17 16 14 80 314 507 644 738 688 800 860 876 775 773 847 810 48 21 10 46 20 10 HRS COUNTED 176 A V E R A G E WE E K D A Y H O U R (MON 6AM THRU FRI 12 NOON) ADT 11 13 62 208 357 485 505 855 801 656 620 576 584 595 519 399 284 270 225 166 78 7848 A X L E - F A C T O R E D (VEHICLES) AV G WE E K D A Y H O U R (FACTOR USED =0.984) ADT 10 12 59 198 341 463 482 529 573 626 591 550 557 568 495 381 271 258 2~5 158 74 7487 DAYS AVG %AVG FACTORED %FACTORED SEASONAL COUNTED HIHR DAY HIHOUR DAY FACTOR 8 656 84% 626 8.4% 1.108 SEASONALLY FACTORED ESTIMATED AADT r 1_WAY COUNT 6757 TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD ST TOURING RTE 25 ON RT 25 FROM N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO STATION 070049 COUNT DATE 61201 2 ST DIR I RECORDER PLACEMENT RC/STATION 070049 New York State Department of Transportation COVERAGE AND SPECIAL COUNT HOURLY REPORT POM. VERSION ST TOURING RTE: 25 ROAD NAME: RT 25 MILEPOINT 0415990 NHS 9 COUNTY: SUFFOLK SECTION FROM: N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO: TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD TOWN: SOUTHOLD FEDERAL DIR. 7 FACTOR GRP 40 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 06 HPMS NUMBER: BIN NUMBER: COUNT DATE: 61201 2 WEEK OF YR 25 RECORDER PLACEMENT: NOTES: WB RT 25 TUBE COUNT REFERENCE MKR: RECORDER SERIAL#: 3597 ADDITIONAL DATA: 12 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 § 10 11 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO ED TO TO TO TO DY D D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MO W R AM PM 20 4 2 362 516 479 524 532 509 511 431 332 235 249 224 138 86 21 5 2 43 17 10 9 11 41 142 248 382 424 444 504 605 540 523 617 612 535 405 315 286 279 237 114 22 6 2 85 55 22 17 18 37 117 204 348 438 509 548 580 498 519 576 554 495 446 362 355 394 304 190 23 7 2 101 68 48 31 14 28 66 176 263 352 439 482 479 469 526 580 576 458 429 346 323 241 156 72 24 1 2 53 29 25 10 11 54 162 262 349 380 411 503 490 449 499 472 448 448 329 239 215 207 121 77 25 2 2 37 22 11 6 9 35 112 242 t~-~~ 357 365 415 457 435 452 490 482 417 302 236 234 169 119 80 26 3 2 28 13 10 8 13 36 116 213 298 342 390 412 460 413 431 350 439 318 183 216 97 56 28 18 27 4 2 13 3 4 3 4 12 32 87 180 153 197 234 229 189 263 245 194 160 DAY HI HI TOTAL COUNT HOUR 7343 617 16 7671 580 13 6719 580 16 6242 503 12 5775 490 16 4688 460 13 30 14 29 13 HRS COUNTED 176 AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOUR (MON 6AM THRU FRI 12 NOON) ADT 9 7 9 31 113 210 300 331 362 431 423 402 435 413 415 355 287 232 199 164 102 65 5339 AXLE - FACTORED (VEHICLES) AVG WEEKDAY HOUR (FACTOR USED =0.954) ADT 9 7 9 30 108 200 286 316 345 411 404 384 415 394 396 339 274 221 190 156 97 62 5095 SEASONALLY FACTORED DAYS AVG % AVG FACTORED % FACTORED SEASONAl IESTIMATED AADT COUNTED HI HR DAY HI HOUR DAY FACTOR I1-WAY COUNT 5 435 81% 415 81% 1.105 4598 TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD ST TOURING RTE 25 ON RT 25 FROM N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO STATION 070049 COUNT DATE 6/20/ 2 ST DIR 2 RECORDER PLACEMENT ATTACHMENT B Valero Gas, Cutchogue 29080 Thursday, 7~23~09 Peak Hour: 7:30 PM to 8:30 PM, 8 PM to 9 PM 7:00 AM 9 5 I 3 4 1 5 9 14 7:15AM I 0 I 0 0 0 2 0 2 7:30 AM 2 4 3 3 7 3 12 10 22 7:45 AM 3 5 3 2 4 1 10 8 18 29 27 56 8:00 AM 1 5 4 2 3 2 8 9 17 32 27 59 8:15 AM I 4 4 4 8 1 13 9 22 43 36 8:30 AM 0 7 2 1 6 1 8 9 17 39 35 74 8:45 AM 1 3 4 5 7 3 12 11 23 41 38 39 Wednesday, 7/22/09 Peak Hour: 4 PM to 5 PM Saturday, 7~25~09 Peak Hour: 10:30 AM to 11:30 AM 10:00 AM 2 6 8 4 9 2 19 12 31 10:15 AM 2 4 5 4 7 2 14 10 24 10:30 AM 4 6 6 2 9 6 19 14 33 10:45 AM 3 4 8 9 6 I 17 14 31 69 50 119 11:00 AM 6 6 4 5 10 5 20 16 36 70 ~ 124 11:15 AM 4 5 4 2 5 7 13 14 27 69 58 127 11:30 AM 3 7 6 2 3 6 12 15 27 62 59 121 11:45 AM 2 5 5 5 10 3 17 13 30 62 58 120 12:00 PM 3 4 4 3 10 0 17 7 24 59 49 108 12:15 PM 1 7 7 I 4 4 12 12 24 58 47 105 12:30 PM 0 8 8 I 6 3 14 12 26 60 44 104 12:45 PM I 7 4 2 7 2 12 11 23 55 42 97 1:00 PM 5 3 8 3 4 5 17 11 28 55 46 101 1:15 PM 6 10 3 1 6 3 15 14 29 58 48 106 1:30 PM 3 6 7 2 3 4 13 12 25 57 48 105 1;45 PM 3 6 6 2 5 3 14 11 25 59 48 107 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631 ) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts December 7, 2009 Via overnight mail Ms. Kristy Winser Southold Town Hall 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re~ Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 Dear Ms. Winser: We are in receipt of your comments dated 6119~09 summarizing comments made during the Planning Board work session. Enclosed, please find (9) copies of the modified site development plans. Your comments have been addressed as follows: Drawing SP-7 illustrates the car que. You will note that the site can accommodate 3 cars per pump. In addition, the required 15' x 45' truck loading space has been illustrated on the plan, as well as a turning template for the fuel delivery track. The car que does not interfere with the fuel delivery track or the designated track loading space. The fuel delivery truck is out of the main car cimulation area. As a practical matter, the amount of cars required to be shown on the site plan is excessive and not indicative of actual site operating conditions. Furthermore, the fuel delivery Iruck visits the site infrequently for short durations of time. As such, it has little to no practical impact to the typical site operation. I have enclosed a copy of a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Dunn Engineering, dated 9/24/09. As indicated in the report, the proposed addition of one pump island to the side of the building and conversion of the repair garage to a convenience store will not have a significant impact on site operation or safety, and is not an over-intensification of use. A detailed iso foot-candle plan is in the process of being produced and will be submitted as soon as it is available. Please note that there are only 3 area lights on site and they are all on the side of the building adjacent to 7-11. In addition, the canopy lights are LED fixtures with limited output. The merchandising screens on top of the pumps shall be removed. No exterior lighting is proposed for the building. Section 280-94d of the Town code permits the use ofa 6 foot high fence in the buffer area in lieu of the plantings. Our original site plan called for the fence. The current version of the site plan has added a single row of evergreen screen plantings along with the fence. A double row is not practical given the existing and proposed infrastructure of the site. It is our hope that the single row coupled with the fence will satisfy the Boards concern. Page 2 Town of Southold Planning Dept. re: Valero Service Station, Cutchogue 12/7/09 5. The number of signs has been reduced. We are currently proposing a free standing ID sign to replace the existing sign, and one graphic sign group on the long face of the canopy. 6. The truck loading area has been illustrated on the site plan. Please note that we will be filing a request with the Suffolk County Planning Commission to re- consider their original recommendation to deny this project. I will copy you when the submittal is made. Upon completion of your review, please direct your comments to my office. Thank you. Sincerely, , William J. LahtifP.E. cc: Mr. Andrew P. Freleng- S.C. Planning Commission w/o encl. doc: 0g043t03 Town PB DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE THOMAS A. ISLES, ~,.I.C.P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING December 15, 2009 William J. Lahti, P.E. LAHTI Engineering & Environmental Consulting 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, New York 11790 Re: S.C.T.M. No.: S.C.P.C. Rile No.: Valero ~ 28975 Rte. 25, Cutchogue 1000 10200 0500 026000 SD-09-04 Dear Mr. Lahti: In accordance with the Suffolk County Planning Commission Policy, the attached information will not be accepted unless forwarded by the local referring municipality. The information must be accompanied with a letter describing such contents, as well as instructions for disregarding previously submitted material. This policy was instituted to avoid confusion as to which map should be reviewed by the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Section 3.9 and 3.10 of the Suffolk County Planning Commission Guidebook (http://www.suffolkcountyny.gov/upload/planning/pdfs2/ scplanning_com/2009~df/scpcguidebk2009.pdf) indicates the Commission Policy on re-consideration of referred matters. The re-referral must come from the Local Municipality. Please note that pursuant to the Suffolk County Administrative Code Section AI4-25D.(3) that the Suffolk County Planning Commission is an advisory body to the local municipality and may be overruled in their determination. Very truly yours, Thomas A. Isles, AICP Director of Planning APF:ds cc: Kristy Winser, Town of Southold Planning Dept. Andrew P. Freleng Chief Planner LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 ~"~- ..... Fax (631) 751-6434 : ~' December 7, 2009 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts Via ovemight mail Ms. Kristy Winser Southold Town Halt 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 Dear Ms. Winser: We are in receipt of your comments dated 6/19/09 summarizing comments made during the Planning Board work session. Enclosed, please find (9) copies of the modified site development plans. Your comments have been addressed as follows: Drawing SP-7 illustrates the car que. You will note that the site can accommodate 3 cars per pump. In addition, the required 15' x 45' truck loading space has been illustrated on the plan, as well as a turning template for the fuel delivery truck. The car que does not interfere with the fuel delivery truck or the designated track loading space. The fuel delivery truck is out of the main car cimulation area. As a practical matter, the amount of cars required to be shown on the site plan is excessive and not indicative of actual site operating conditions. Furthermore, the fuel delivery track visits the site infrequently for short durations of time. As such, it has little to no practical impact to the typical site operation. I have enclosed a copy of a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Duma Engineering, dated 9/24/09. As indicated in the report, the proposed addition of one pump island to the side of the building and conversion of the repair garage to a convenience store will not have a significant impact on site operation or safety, and is not an over-intensification of use. A detailed iso foot-candle plan is in the process of being produced and will be submitted as soon as it is available. Please note that there are only 3 area lights on site and they are all on the side of the building adjacent to 7-11. In addition, the canopy lights are LED fixtures with limited output. The merchandising screens on top of the pumps shall be removed. No exterior lighting is proposed for the building. Section 280-94d of the Town code permits the use ofa 6 foot high fence in the buffer area in lieu of the plantings. Our original site plan called for the fence. The current version of the site plan has added a single row of evergreen screen plantings along with the fence. A double row is not practical given the existing and proposed infrastructure of the site. It is our hope that the single row coupled with the fence will satisfy the Boards concem. Page 2 Town of Sout Planning Dept. re: Valero Service S n, Cutchogue 12/7/09 The number of signs has been reduced. We are currently proposing a free standing ID sign to replace the existing sign, and one graphic sign group on the long face of the canopy. 6. The track loading area has been illustrated on the site plan. Please note that we will be filing a request with the Suffolk County Planning Commission to re- consider their original recommendation to deny this project. I will copy you when the submittal is made. Upon completion of your review, please direct your comments to my office. Thank you. Sincerely, , . William J. Lahti,~.E. cc: Mr. Andrew P. Freleng- S.C. Planning Commission w/o encl. doc: 08043t03 Town PB 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts December 7, 2009 Via overnight mail Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, Chief Planner Suffolk County Planning Commission H. Lee Dennison Bldg.-4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway, P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: SCPC File No.: SD-09-04 .... Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutch~ogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 ? ' Dear Ms. Freleng: . ~ · :~ maccurate or incomplete information. ~ .......... - ........ Three specific reasons were cited for the disapproval: I. Unwarranted over-intensification of the use 2. Tends to diminish the safety and traffic carrying capacity of the New York State Route 25 3. Site plan design of the proposed multiple use is a poor configuration Enclosed please £md an updated set of site development plans. In addition, enclosed please £md a Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated 9/24/09. I would like to address the Commission's reasons for disapproval. Unwarranted over-intensification of use- ao It is not unwarranted. The owners of the property are trying to ensure that the business remains financially solvent, continues to efficiently and safely serve its patrons, and continues to contribute to the tax base. bo The service station use already exists. The proposed additional pump island on the side of the building is for the purpose of providing additional pumping capacity during peak periods. Having the additional fueling position allows the operator to fuel more vehicles and alleviate any congestion that builds on site. -- ~Page 2 S.C. Planning~ommission. re: Valero Service Station, Cutchogue 12/7/09 c. The proposed convenience store use is in exchange for giving up the repair garage use. The number of uses on site remains unchanged. As stated in the TIA by Dunn, the convenience store use in this setting does not add any appreciable amount of trip ends. Convenience store customers are typically already on-site to purchase fuel. Tends to diminish the safety and traffic carrying capacity of the New York State Route 25- As stated in the TIA, the addition of the side pump island and conversion of the repair garage to a small sized convenience store will have no appreciable effect on the trip generation rate for this site. ii. With regard to impacting NYS Route 25 with the vehicle que, drawing SP-7 demonstrates that the site conforms to the Town's requirement of 3 cars per pump. Site plan design of the proposed multiple use is a poor configuration- While the site design may not be optimal, it is completely functional and conforms to the Town's requirement for parking and vehicle queing while maintaining the existing on- site infrastructure. As stated in the TIA, vehicles using the proposed pump island on the side of the building are able to make the turning maneuver necessary to get back to Main Rd. · The proposed parking stalls are out of the main traffic path for the petroleum filling operation. · The east to west on-site traffic flow enacted at the request of the NYSDOT will aid in efficient circulation. Miscellaneous Comments Made During Commission Meeting- There were numerous comments made during the meeting that require clarification and/or correction; 1) The curbcuts on Main Road are not unrestricted. In accordance with comments received from the NYSDOT, the eastern most curbcut shall be ingress only and the western most shall be egress only. 2) The location of the proposed parking stalls does not place pedestrians at an increased risk. The stalls are out of the main traffic circulation path. The patrons can reach the store sidewalk without having to cross the main vehicle traffic path. 3) The statement was made regarding the pedestrians "...they're going to have to watch out for cars moving in and out of the site...' and "... pedestrians are and motor vehicles are going to have to negotiate with each other." Of course they will. That is true of every parking lot in the world. That is not an issue specific to this site or the proposed uses. 4) Please be advised that the facility owner did have an approved Town of Southold permit to construct the pump island on the side of the building. It was not until the fire marshal 'Page 3 S C P1 · . annl g Commission. re: Valero Service Station, Cutchogue 12/7/O9 made a final inspection that the Town inspector realized the addition of a pump island required a Town site plan review. The pump on the side of the building dispenses gasoline and diesel fuel. As previously stated, it is anticipated that the pump will only be used during peak periods when additional pumping capacity is necessary to efficiently handle the on-site traffic volume. 6) With regard to the building, the owners wanted to make the building more visually appealing. Since the site was going to be out of operation for several months while the new underground tank system was installed, they opted to rehab the building. If you go into the building you will see that it is empty, except for the customer service area (which previously existed), utility room and restroom. A convenience store was not constructed. The existing building was simply renovated in anticipation of adding a small retail area where the repair bays used to be. 7) As you know, NYS Route 25 is under the State's jurisdiction. The NYSDOT issued comments and we addressed all of them. 8) Shifting the curbcut on Depot Lane 10 feet, which is the most you can do given the required Town buffer area and existing underground tank installation, will not add any queing capacity for cars on Depot Lane waiting to make a left turn onto NYS Route 25. 9) The pumps under the existing canopy have been there. They were changed as part of the underground tank project, but the new pumps were installed in the same locations as the previous pumps. 10) As demonstrated by the Traffic Impact Assessment, the proposed additional pump island and conversion of the repair garage to a small convenience store does not have any appreciable effect on the trip generation rate for this site. The proposed improvements do allow the operator to handle peak fueling periods much more efficiently and supplement the income stream via convenience item sales to fuel patrons. I, and the site owner, would be more than happy to meet with the Commission and/or staff to answer any questions you may have. Please notify my office of the action taken on our request for re-consideration. Thank you. Sincerely, ~ William J. LahtCP.E. cc: Ms. Kristy Winser- Town of Southold Planning Dept. w/o encl. doc: 08043s01 sc planning September 24, 2009 Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. LAHTI Engineering 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, New York 11-790~ Re:~ Traffic Impact Assessment Valero Gas and Convenience Store NYS Route 25 Dear Mr. Lahti: ; _~ Cutchogue, New York In accordance with your request, ~,w,e,~ha~e pre~at:~d this Traffic Impact Assessment which contains the results of a ~raffi6"~d/i'~ineering evaluation of the redevelopment of an existing gasoline and automotive service station on NYS Route 25 (Main Road) in Cutchogue. This evaluation focuses on the traffic effects of the addition a new pump island and the conversion of building area from automotive service bays to a convenience store. The new pump island contains two fueling positions (one on either side)· The station currently has a single pump island with four fueling positions· The proposed change would allow for simultaneous fueling of six vehicles rather than the existing four. Location, Existing Roadway and Access Conditions The site is located on the northwest comer of Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Depot Lane within the hamlet of Cutchogue and the Township of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Main Road is a major east/west state facility which provides one lane in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its intersection with Depot Lane, an eastbound left turn lane is provided which extends part way across the site's frontage and can be used for left tums into the site. The speed limit on Main Road in the vicinity of the site is 35 miles per hour. Depot Lane is a north/south local town roadway which intersects Main Road to form a "T" intersection and extends north. Depot Lane provides one lane in each direction and is stop- controlled at its intersection with Main Road. Currently, access is provided to the site via three driveways. Two driveways are located on Main Road and one driveway on Depot Lane. Full movements are currently permitted at all three driveway locations. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 2 Main Road and Depot Lane are basically flat and straight in the vicinity of the site. As such, there are no impediments to adequate sight distance to vehicles entering and exiting the site. It is notable that directly adjacent to the west is a 7-Eleven convenience store. This store is larger than that proposed on the Valero site. The 7-Eleven store does not sell gasoline. Existing traffic volumes, in the form of New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) automated traffic recorder (ATR) counts, were obtained for Main Road and are included as Attachment A to this letter. These counts indicate that the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on this section of NYS Route 25 was 11,350 vehicles per day in 2002. Main Road exhibits typical weekday AM and PM peak period commuter traffic peaks. However, it is also notable that given the nature of the area, seasonal variations in traffic patterns also exist due to the recreational opportunities on the North Fork of Long Island. This is evident in higher levels of traffic outside winter months with weekend peak traffic often exceeding weekday levels. Existing Site Trip Generation To document the existing site driveway volumes, manual counts of entering and exiting vehicles were conducted. These counts were performed on Wednesday July 22nd, Thursday July 23rd and Saturday July 25th, 2009. Driveway entering and exiting volumes were recorded during the weekday AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 PM), the weekday PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) and the Saturday peak midday period (10:00 AM to 2:00 PM). The complete details of these counts are included in Attachment B to the letter. The peak hour combined driveway volumes found are summarized in Table 1, below. 53 51 104 41 38 79 Saturda Peak 69 58 127 Table 1 Counted Driveway Volumes The peak combined driveway volume occurred during the peak hour on Saturday (10:30 AM 11:30 AM), when a total of 127 trips were recorded. This value includes 69 entering and 58 exiting trips. It should be noted that these counts reflect the operation of the station without the new pump island or convenience store in operation. In addition, the previous auto repair activity is also absent. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 3 Patron traffic activity at gasoline filling stations involves, almost exclusively, vehicles that are already on the roadway. They are not new trips generated by the use but what is considered a secondary or pass-by trip that occurs as part of an existing primary trip to another destination. As such, while there are driveway volumes present, the volume on the surrounding roadways does not increase measurably due to the presence of the use. This aspect of trip-making as it relates to gasoline sales as well as convenience stores is discussed in more detail later in this report. Addition of Pump Island The addition of a pump island at the station will provide for two additional fueling positions, bringing the total number of fueling positions to six. This will allow for simultaneous servicing of six vehicles rather than the existing four. This will allow for decreased vehicle queuing at the existing pumps during peak periods which occasionally impedes site circulation. Based on the trip generating characteristics of gasoline sales, this addition is not expected to result in any significant increase in the number of vehicles visiting the site, as discussed below. Gasoline sales is an operation driven to a very large extent by convenience. Trips for gasoline are rarely made as a primary trip or as a trips main purpose. Drivers stop for gas as part of another trip. Very rarely would a driver leave home for instance, travel to solely get gasoline and then return home. The vast majority of trips for gas originates from the passing traffic stream and are not new trips. As such, the driveway volumes seen at gasoline stations are most directly related to the volumes on the adjacent roadway(s) and not the number of pumping stations. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication "Trip Generation" contains data on trip generating characteristics for gasoline stations based on either the number of fueling positions or the peak volumes passing the site. This data indicates, based on curve fitting, that the traffic passing a site is a better predictor of driveway volumes than the number of pumping stations. With the addition of the pump island alone, driveway volumes are not anticipated to increase any significant degree, if at all. Dunn Engineering Associates (DEA) performed a customer survey in the early 1990's in which customers to existing gasoline service stations with convenience store in Suffolk County were interviewed regarding the nature of their trip. This involved interviews with over 200 persons on a weekday and a Saturday regarding a) the purpose of their trip, b) the route they selected, and c) the types of purchases they made. The results of this study are summarized in Table 2 below. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 4 e a~ ....... 1. What is the purpose of your trip: a) Work 7g tg b) Shopping 5 39 c) Recreation/Social 4 28 d) School 3 0 e) Service Station Only 1 0 f) Other 9 14 2. How did you get to this service station: a) Usually drive by 87 81 b) Made a route change (detour) to get there 13 19 3. Did you/will you buy: a) Gas only 56 70 b) Convenience Store item(s) only 15 15 c) Both 29 15 Table 2 Service Station Study The results of the study confirm that almost no one (less than 1%) made a trip to the service station as their sole purpose. In addition, an average of 84% of site visitors were on the adjacent roadway already passing the site. This data confirms two things. First, the vast majority of trips to a site such as the one in question are not new. This reinforces the fact that these uses do not generate significant levels of new trips and that their driveway volumes do not significantly add to overall traffic levels in the area. Second, this data supports the fact that the driveway volumes to a gas station site such as this are directly related to volumes on the adjacent roadway. The addition of a pump island with two fueling positions will not of itself have any significant effect on driveway volumes or volumes on the surrounding roadways. Proposed Convenience Store The operator of the station is seeking approval to operate a convenience store in the 1,200 square foot building which formerly housed the site office, a smaller amount of retail space and an auto repair operation. The development of projections of trip increases as a result of this change is not straightforward. The trips that would have been attributable to the auto repair activity were not captured in the driveway counts as that business was not operating when the counts were taken. In addition, the sites location directly adjacent to a larger national chain convenience store will affect patron draw to the proposed convenience store. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 5 The data collected during the course of the DEA survey also indicates two things regarding trips to convenience stores on gas station sites. Like gasoline sales, the vast majority of the trips involving the convenience store, were already on the roadway and are not new-trips but pass-by trips. Also, the majority of patrons using the convenience store are already on site purchasing gasoline. In regard to trips reduced by elimination of the automobile repair operation, the ITE Trip Generation publication does contain some information on the trip making activity at what is referred to as Auto Care Centers. However, the data is limited and the sites studied to develop the data averaged 12,000 square feet in size, or ten times the size of the building in question. It is apparent however that a fairly low level of trips would have been generated by this small auto repair shop; perhaps only 3 to 5 per hour. What can be said of these trips, however, is that these would have been new trips on the roadway, not pass-by trips as are the trips for gasoline and to the convenience store. The DEA customer survey data indicates that most customers patronizing the convenience store were already on the site purchasing gasoline. To determine what increase in driveway volumes can be expected by the introduction of the convenience store, the DEA customer survey data introduced previously in Table I is utilized. Looking at Table 1, question 3 gives an indication as to what portion of visits to the site will be for the convenience store only. On a weekday the data indicates that 15 trips would be made to the convenience store in isolation compared to 85 involving gasoline sales. This translates to a 17.6% potential increase. On a Saturday, the convenience store only visit ratio is the same. Therefore, it can be deduced that the site would see a 17.6% increase in driveway volumes, if the adjacent 7-11 were not present. Table 3, below, presents the existing driveway volumes, the projected driveway volumes and the gross change. These projections include no adjustment for the presence of the adjacent 7-Eleven store. Weekday AM 53 51 104 Existing , Weekday PM 41 38 79 Saturday Midday 69 58 127 Weekday AM 62 60 122 Proposed Weekday PM 48 45 93 Saturday Midday 81 68 149 Gross Change Weekday AM +9 +9 +18 (Driveway Volume) , Weekday PM +7 +7 +14 Saturday Midday +12 +10 +22 Net Change Weekday AM +2 +2 +4 (New Traffic on Roadway) Weekday PM +1 +1 +2 Saturday Midday +2 +2 +4 Table 3 Projected Proposed Peak Driveway Volumes Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 6 The gross change reflects increases in driveway volumes, not increases in volume on adjacent streets. Still, increases are less than one trip every two minutes on Saturday during the peak period and less at other times. In terms of new trips on the roadways, we know from the DEA survey that 84% of visits to the site will already be on the road passing the site. Therefore, the projected new traffic on the adjacent roadways, shown as the Net Change in Table 3, does not exceed 4 vehicle trips per hour at peak times. The presence of the adjacent 7-11 is likely to reduce the number of convenience store only visits to the site below even that presented in Table 3. Motorists wishing to stop for convenience items without purchasing gas would be more inclined to patronize the larger, more recognizable store. The increases in Table 3 are therefore likely high. The net change in traffic (increases in volume on the adjacent streets) does not take this factor, nor the elimination of trips due to the automobile repair operation into account. Given the very small net traffic increases in Table 3 (maximum of 4 trips in the peak hour) it is likely that the elimination of auto repair trips and the proximity to 7-11 would cancel out any increase entirely. Site Circulation Two aspects of the sites redevelopment will affect existing site circulation. The construction of the new pump island will require fueling vehicles to navigate a portion of the site previously not actively used. In addition, the NYSDOT has recommended that each of the two access drives on Main Road be restricted to one-way movements. To determine the ability of vehicles to access and depart the new pump island a field circulation test was performed. In this test a full size, extended cab, dual wheel pickup track was utilized to test the geometry. The track was able to access and egress both sides of the new pump island without difficulty. The presence of the new pump island will reduce vehicle queuing on the site at the existing pumps during peak periods of activity, improving site circulation by reducing congestion there. It is noted however, that the presence of fueling vehicles at the new pump island, may obstruct, to a degree, the two easternmost parking stalls proposed west of the building. It is therefore recommended that employees use these stalls to limit stall turnover and potential interference. The NYSDOT has recommended that the easterly driveway be signed for entering vehicles only and that the westerly driveway be signed for exiting vehicles only. Given the location of the site on the comer of Depot Lane and the presence and length of the left turn lane on Main Road, these changes are appropriate. The restriction of turning movements at access points along a roadway is a standard access management practice which has been shown to improve traffic flow and safety. Entering vehicles being restricted to the easterly driveway (or Depot Lane) ensures use of the left turn storage lane, ensuring less disruption to thru traffic on Main Road. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 7 The NYSDOT has also requested that the potential for cross access to and from the adjacent 7- Eleven site be explored. This cross access would, if provided, serve no benefit to the gas station site but allow 7-Eleven patrons direct access to Depot Lane. While cross access arrangements under the right circumstances can serve as a positive measure to reduce trips on the adjacent roadway, (in this case Main Road), it is not recommended in this instance. The gas station site, as existing and proposed, does not have a dedicated thru traffic aisle which could easily handle the traffic through the site due to the 7-Eleven. While the site will adequately handle gas sales and convenience store patrons, it is not laid out for cross access traffic which would, due to driver behavior, be moving at significantly higher speeds. With the restriction of driveway movements as recommended by the NYSDOT the site will have a generally east to west traffic pattern. This is counter to and in conflict with vehicles that would be leaving 7-Eleven to Depot Lane. For circulation and safety reasons, it is recommended that cross access not be implemented at this time. It is also noted that cross access may lead to additional 7-Eleven traffic utilizing Depot Lane. Conclusions Based on the above analysis, it is clear that the redevelopment of the site as proposed will not have any significant detrimental effect on traffic conditions in the area. In support of this conclusion we state the following: The best predictor of site traffic levels for a gasoline station is not the number of pumps but the level of traffic on the adjacent streets. The addition of a pump island with two fueling stations positions will not result in any significant increases in site volumes. The presence of the new pump island will result in a reduction in vehicle queuing at the existing pumps during peak periods of activity, improving site circulation by reducing congestion. Field circulation tests performed indicate that both sides of the new pump island can be accessed and egressed by large vehicles without difficulty. The two stalls closest to this island should be used by employees as they may be blocked partially by fueling vehicles. The vast majority of trips to gasoline stations with convenience stores involve gasoline sales. The addition of the convenience store will result in small increases in driveway volume on the order of one trip every two minutes at peak. The increases in driveway volumes come in large part from the passing traffic stream and are not new trips. The very small volume of new trips due to the convenience store will likely be canceled out by the elimination of trips to the former auto repair use. The presence of the adjacent 7-Eleven store is likely to reduce the number of convenience store only trips to this site as patrons will chose the larger, more recognizable store. Mr. Bill Lahti, P.E. September 24, 2009 Page 8 10. The left turn lane on Main Road that can be used to enter the site ensures that the site's operation will not affect traffic flow on Main Road. Implementation of the NYSDOT's recommendation to restrict entering vehicles to the easterly driveway ensures its use. It is recommended that the cross access to the adjacent 7-Eleven not be implemented at this time. The current and proposed layout of the gas station site does not support thru traffic and the cross access will detract from site circulation as well as safety. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me. Sincer, fi~y, -2/-, Patrick Lenihan, P.E. Associate Engineer PL:as L209237 P29080 Att. ATTACHMENT A RC/STATION 070049 New York State Department of Transportation COVERAGE AND SPECIAL COUNT HOURLY REPORT ST. TOURING RTE: 25 ROAD NAME: RT 25 MILEPOINT 0415990 NHS SECTION FROM: N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO: TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD FEDERAL DIR. 3 FACTOR GRP 40 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 09 HPMS NUMBER: COUNT DATE: 6/20! 2 WEEK OF YR 25 RECORDER PLACEMENT: NOTES: EB RT 25 TUBE COUNT DY D D MO W R 20 4 1 22 6 1 94 38 24 1 1 54 25 25 2 1 39 17 26 3 1 36 19 27 4 I 58 33 32 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 AM PGM V~RSION COUNTY: SUFFOLK TOWN: SOUTHOLD BINNUMBER: REFERENCE MKR: RECORDER SERIAL #: 3597 ADDITIONAL DATA: 3.5 / 4.0 12 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DAY HI HI PM TOTAL COUNT HOUR 492 547 880 533 519 843 522 436 366 292 270 216 166 75 6 10 7 59 t78 337 482 439 550 631 738 674 483 639 826 625 434 436 355 266 182 137 8368 736 13 18 10 18 49 161 254 394 486 622 692 684 643 622 737 514 531 461 387 351 309 188 127 8390 737 16 28 22 12 31 131 157 258 418 530 607 661 579 576 483 458 424 286 240 211 182 115 74 6597 661 13 9 5 16 55 179 300 418 418 527 500 627 508 491 488 480 436 383 264 241 198 117 66 6803 627 13 ~4~tl~ 475 531 603 631 565 528 505 525 462 362 290 251 213 132 61 7211 631 13 7 7 45 184 325 10 10 20 62 183 318 438 457 539 524 584 616 568 610 602 449 485 288 319 273 249 109 7765 616 14 17 16 14 80 314 507 644 738 688 800 860 876 775 773 847 810 AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOUR (MON 6AM THRU FRI 12 NOON) ADT 48 21 10 11 13 62 208 357 485 505 555 601 686 620 576 884 595 519 399 284 270 225 166 78 7848 A X L E - F A C T O R E D (VEHICLES) A V G WE E K D A Y H O U R (FACTOR USED =0.954) ADT 46 20 10 10 12 59 198 341 463 482 529 873 626 591 550 557 568 498 381 271 258 218 158 74 7487 HRS DAYS AVG % AVG FACTORED % FACTORED SEASONAL COUNTED COUNTED HIHR DAY HIHOUR DAY FACTOR 176 8 858 8.4% 626 8.4% 1,108 SEASONALLY FACTORED ESTIMATED AADT 1-WAY COUNT 6757 ST TOURING RTE 25 ON RT 25 FROM N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD STATION 070049 COUNT DATE 61201 2 ST DIR 1 RECORDER PLACEMENT New York State Department of Transportation RC/STATION 070049 COVERAGE AND SPECIAL COUNT HOURLY REPORT ST. TOURING RTE: 25 ROAD NAME: RT 25 MILEPOINT 0415990 NHS SECTION FROM: N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO: TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD FEDERAL DIR 7 FACTOR GRP 40 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 05 HPMS NUMBER: COUNT DATE: 6/201 2 WEEK OF YR 25 RECORDER PLACEMENT: NOTES WB RT 25 TUBE COUNT 12 I 2 3 4 5 6 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO DY D D I 2 3 4 5 6 7 MO W R AM 20 4 2 21 5 2 43 17 10 9 11 41 142 22 6 2 85 55 22 17 18 37 117 23 7 2 101 68 48 31 14 28 66 24 I 2 53 29 25 10 11 54 162 25 2 2 37 22 11 6 8 35 112 26 3 2 28 13 10 8 13 36 116 27 4 2 13 3 4 3 4 12 32 PGM. VERSION COUNTY: SUFFOLK TOWN: SOUTHOLD BINNUMBER: REFERENCE MKR: RECORDER SERIAL#: 3597 ADDITIONAL DATA: 35/ 4.0 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO PM 362 516 479 524 532 509 511 431 332 235 249 224 138 86 248 382 424 444 504 605 540 523 617 612 535 405 315 286 279 237 114 7343 6t7 16 204 348 438 509 548 580 498 519 576 554 495 446 362 355 394 304 190 7671 580 13 176 263 352 439 482 479 465 526 580 576 458 429 346 323 241 156 72 6719 580 16 262 348 380 411 503 490 449 499 472 448 448 329 239 215 207 121 77 6242 503 12 242 (~ 357 365 415 457 435 452 490 482 417 302 236 234 169 119 80 5775 490 16 213 298 342 390 412 460 413 431 350 439 318 183 216 97 56 28 18 4888 460 13 87 180 153 197 234 229 189 263 245 194 160 DAY HI HI TOTAL COUNT HOUR 30 14 29 13 HRS COUNTED 176 AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOUR (MON 6AM THRU FRI 12NOON) AOT 7 9 31 113 210 300 331 362 431 423 402 435 413 415 355 287 232 199 164 102 65 5339 AXLE - FACTORED (VEHICLES) AVG WEEKDAY HOUR (FACTOR USED --0.954 ) AOT 7 9 30 108 200 286 316 345 411 404 384 415 394 396 339 274 221 190 156 97 62 5095 OAYS AVG COUNTED HIHR 8 435 SEASONALLY FACTORED % AVG FACTORED % FACTORED SEASONAL ESTIMATED AADT DAY HIHOUR DAY FACTOR 1-WAYCOUNT 81% 415 81% 1.108 4598 TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD ST TOURING RTE 25 ON RT 25 FROM N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO STATION 070049 COUNT DATE 61201 2 ST DIR 2 RECORDER PLACEMENT ATTACHMENT B Valero Gas, Cutchogue 29080 Thursday, 7/23/09 Peak Hour: 7:30 PM to 8:30 PM, 8 PM to 9 PM 8:15AM I 4 4 4 8 I 13 9 22 43 36 8:45 AMI 1 3 4 5 7 3 12 11 23 41 38 ~9 Wednesday, 7122109 Peak Hour: 4 PM to 5 PM Saturday, 7/25109 Peak Hour: 10:30 AM to 11:30 AM 10:00 AM 2 6 8 4 9 2 19 12 31 10;15AM 2 4 5 4 7 2 14 10 24 10:30 AM 4 6 6 2 9 6 19 14 33 10:45 AM 3 4 8 9 6 I 17 14 31 69 50 119 11:00 AM 6 6 4 5 10 5 20 16 36 70 54 124 11:15 AM 4 5 4 2 5 7 13 14 27 69 58 11:30 AM 3 7 6 2 3 6 12 15 27 62 59 121 11:45 AM 2 5 5 5 10 3 17 13 30 62 58 120 12:00 PM 3 4 4 3 10 0 17 7 24 59 49 108 12:15 PM I 7 7 I 4 4 12 12 24 58 47 105 12:30 PM 0 8 8 I 6 3 14 12 26 60 44 104 12:45 PM 1 7 4 2 7 2 12 11 23 55 42 97 1:00 PM 5 3 8 3 4 5 17 11 28 55 46 101 1:15 PM 6 10 3 1 6 3 15 14 29 58 48 106 1:30 PM 3 6 7 2 3 4 13 12 25 57 48 105 1:45 PM 3 6 6 2 5 3 14 11 25 59 48 107 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June 19,2009 William Lahti, P.E. c/o Lahti Engineering 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Re: Site Plan for Valero Service Station SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Lahti: As a follow up to the Planning Board Work Session held on June 15, 2009, the above- referenced site plan was discussed and the following actions were taken. Please revise in accordance with the following comments and re-submit directly to the Planning Department: It was determined that additional information is necessary for the Planning Board to adequately make determinations regarding your site plan application. The following Items are requested to further assist in their review process: a. Site cimulation is inadequate. The site plan does not meet the minimum requirement for a gas station (3 car queues per each gas pump) or show a truck loading area for deliveries. Provide a plan that demonstrates how the gas pump islands and car queue provided will not interfere with on-site circulation and safety. Include a truck template on the plan that will clearly show movement on site and associated turning radius. In addition, provide a comparative analysis of similar sites i.e. Jamesport Valero and any additional information that may support relaxations for these items for the Planning Boards consideration. b. Submit a traffic impact analysis (TIS) as discussed for review. c. Submit a detailed lighting plan.for review. It should include a isometric foot-candle distribution diagram plotting the light levels for all fixtures including existing/proposed lighting on the building, canopy, and screens on the pumps and proposed signage. A 15-foot transitional Buffer area is required as per Town Code Section 280- 94. As a minimum, the planting shall consist of a double row of evergreen type trees six feet in height planted at intervals of 10 feet on center at the discretion of the Planning Board. Also, provide Landscape detail for the planter box along the west property line. As discussed, the number of signs should be limited to any two of the following: · A freestanding sign, directory sign, a window sign, a wall sign or a roof sign. · The following sign material should be avoided corrugated plastic, aluminum, bulbous plastic letters, non-textured plastics and glass tile. 4. Show a loading area as required by code. Staff, the Town Planning Board, Town departments and involved/interested agencies will provide additional comments following full review. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Applications: WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, June 15, 2009 4:00 p.m. Site Plans Project n_ame:__ Peconic Landing/Bre_cknock Hall I SCTM#:,I 1000-35:1-25 Location: n/s/o NYS Route 25 1 121' e/o Sound'Road, in Greenport Description: This amended site plan is for the proposed renovation of an existing two,- story building where 1,565 sq. ft. is public space, 1,400 sq. ft. is office space, plus misc space and one (1) two-bedroom aPartment on the second floor on a 136.6 acre parcel known as Peconic Landing in the R- 80 Zone. Status: Request f-or extension to complete work on site. Action: Staff inspected the site and has found that the work done to date is in accordance with the approved sit~ plan. Attachments: Project name: Location: Descripti_on: Status: Action: Attachments: Matt-A-Mar Marina Wickham Avenue, Mattituck I SCTM#: I 1000-1.14-3-1 Expansion of boat storage and offices .The aj~proved site plan was extended to August 09, 2009. The applicant requests an extension of time for Health Dept. approval. Project name: Location: Description.: Status: Action: Valero Service Station I SCTM#: I 1000-102-5-26 This site is located on the nlw comer of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue. This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on a 18,473 s~ ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. New Site Plan Review site~l, anand comments received. Attachments: Staff Re~ort / referral comments Project name: Location: Hellenic Snack Bar & Restaurant '~-~C~M~.' 1000-35-2~14 Main Road, East Marion Amended site plan for an addition to the existing restaurant Status: A s x month extension was granted for the amended site plan. A_ction: Req_uest~e~n on approved s te plan .... Attachme-~.: ....... _ SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR I'OWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)-765-9015 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (63 I) - 765 - 1560 JAMIE.RICHTER~TOWN.SOUTHO LD.NY.U S OFFICE OF THE:ENGINEER .,~%TD~N OF SOUTHOLD Martin H. Sidor Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Dear Mr. Sidor: April 16, 2009 Valero Service Station State Route 25 & Depot Lane SCTM #: .1000-102-05-26 As per a request from your office, ,I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. This site plan,has been prepared by the office of Lahti Engineering & Environmental Consulting, P.C. and has been dated 10/20/08 with a revision date of 1/20/09. Please consider the following: 1. A bulk of the work indicated on the site plan has already been constructed without Planning Board Approval. This entire site has been opened up for the installation of new underground storage tanks as well as the installation of a new Pump Station that has been indicated or noted as Existing on the plan. These improvements should not be considered "grandfathered" due to the fact that they were recently installed without the necessary approvals. 2. The line of concrete curbing indicated at the corner of Depot Lane and Route 25 does not accurately show the raised curbing and handicap ramp between sidewalk and street pavement. This may be misleading whey reviewing the existing site conditions & proposed traffic patterns and could hinder the coordination & review of the proposed new landscaping. 3. There are two existing curb cuts located on Route 25. The easterly curb cut will create conflicts between the vehicular traffic coming to & from the site and the norma~ traffic moving through this intersection. In addition, a person on foot moving within the adjacent cross walk may be cut off by exiting traffic that has not fully recognized there presence within the cross walk. It is recommended that this easterly Curb Cut be Closed to vehicular traffic. 4. Currently, there are two locations where the narrow strip of shoulder area. between the Sidewalk and Curbing along Depot Lane has been paved with asphalt. Does the Planning Board want to have these areas stripped of asphalt and planted with Grass? 5. The location of the proposed handicap parking is over an existing concrete slab that has six cast iron inspection/access covers. These solid cast iron covers are +/- 2" above finish grade. This is a tripping hazard and would be difficult to permit in normal parking areas. The fact that this is proposed to be handicap parking will require the installation of additional pavement or other such means to eliminate this hazard. Page 1 of 2 Martin H. Sider, Chairman - Planning Board Re: Valero Service Station SCTM #: 1000-102-05-26 April 16, 2009 Page 2 of 2 6. The proposed parking spaces in the Northwesterly corner of the site do not appear to have adequate turning area to safely maneuver vehicles in and out of these spaces. This item should be addressed by showing turning radius and traffic patterns. 7. The New Gas pumps that have been installed behind the Westerly side of the existing building do not appear to have enough room for turning or adequate queuing of vehicles that will try to access this new pump from either side. This required queuing of vehicles should not be shown or indicated to overlap with other queuing areas. This item should be addressed by showing all vehicular turning radius, queuing and traffic patterns in a manner that does not overlap with other site requirements and provides for a free flowing safe access to all operations of the site. 8. My office has received several complaints regarding a TV sign that has been installed at this site. This type of advertisement could be considered a distraction in an area that is already congested with access issues. The Planning Board should review this type of advertisement and determine its compliance with the intent of the Town's signage code. 9. Drainage calculations have been provided and would appear to meet the minimum requirements of Town Code. All construction and certification of existing drainage structures appear to meet the minimum requirements of Town Code Section 236 for Storm-water Management. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. , re,y. ~xfames A. Richter, R.A. Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, RE REGIONAL DIRECTOR April 13, 2009 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11'788 www nysdot.gov ASTRID C. GLYNN COMMISSIONER Mr. William J. Lahti, P.E Lahti Engineering, PC 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Town of Southold February 12, 2009 Submission Your March 3, 2009 Submission Valero Service Station Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM 1000-10200-0500-026000 Our Case No. 09-053P Dear Mr. Lahti: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work within New York State highway right-of-way and issuance of a Ne:v York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: In recent years, many states have employed access management as a major technique to address conflicts between through traffic and that generated by developments. The goals of access management are to limit the number of access points, separate conflict points and remove turning traffic from through movements. New York State is utilizing this technique to minimize impacts to State highways. We recommend, therefore, that cross access to this site be obtained from adjacent property. If this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. While we recognize that the project does not propose any modifications to the State highway frontage, our review notes that the existing driveway design is not in accordance with the design guidelines in our driveway policy manual. The driveway policy manual, Policy and Standards for the Design of Entrances to State Highways, is available on our website at www.nysdot.gov. We recommend that you consult the manual so that the Mr. William J. Lahti April 13, 2009 Page 2 of 3 State highway access points can be designed in accordance with the policy to provide recommended offsets from intersections and property lines, driveway widths, minimum spacing between driveways, etc. We recommend that the driveways be signed for one-way movements, with the east driveway signed as a one-way ingress and the west driveway signed as a one-way egress. One-way signs should be shown posted back to back on each side of each driveway. The sidewalk pedestrian ramp at the comer of NY 25 and Depot Lane should be shown to be upgraded and called out on the plans in conformance with current ADA standards. All connecting ramps across the street must also be improved to those standards as well and should be shown and called out in the same manner with the appropriate detail referenced to NYSDOT specifications. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the NY 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. A Work Zone Traffic Control plan must be provided for work on NY 25 in accordance with Standard Sheets and Section 619. The plan must include the note "All lanes must be open to traffic before 10 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." 7. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." 8. Please show and call out the nearest NY 25 mile marker on the plan. We recommend that permanent survey markers be installed at the property limits along the State highway frontage. Please call out these locations on the plans and include the appropriate detail. 10. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of-way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Work Zone Traffic Control plan - all referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers and the National Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices with NYS Supplement) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. The applicant may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regarding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP) applications. The applicant should be made aware that utility HWP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. Please submit four (4) copies of plans that address the comments noted above. In your response letter, please state how the above comments are addressed, item by item. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all Mr. William J. Lahti April 13, 2009 Page 3 of 3 correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Oris:inal Si~ned By Shaik & $3Ld SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: ~[r. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold x/Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner, Town of Southold Mr. Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:ajf 04 01 09Planning.txt 10 11 12 1] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2~ 24 25 Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 agenda today, and so we'll move to that now. The first item is the valero Service Station out of Southold. Mr. Freleng. MR. FRELENG: Thank you, Mr. chairman. As you indicated, the first regulatory matter before the suffolk county Planning Commission is the application from the Town of southold of valero Service Station. 3urisdiction for the commission is that the subject property is adjacent to New York State Route 25. The applicants are seeking Town Planning Board Site Plan approval for the conversion of a gasoline filling station and repair garage to a filling station and convenience store. The parking seems to be in conformance with the town requirements. The location of the subject property is on the southwest corner of 92 i 2 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 Main Street, which is New York State Page 79 93 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 70 21 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt Route 25, and Depot Lane, which is a town road. If you can move to the zoning a second. MR. CORRAL: (Complying) MR. FRELENG: If you take a look at the zoning map, you could see that the subject property is located on the eastern edge of the hamlet business zoning district. There's a residence office district next to it. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: Excuse me, Andy -- MR. FRELENG: Yes. COHMISSIONER BRAUN: -- can you move that way a little bit. MR. FRELENG: (Complying) COMMISSIONER BRAUN: Okay. you. Thank MR. FRELENG: The majority of the zoning around the subject property, outside of the two zones indicated, is residential. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 okay. The land use in the area is pretty much reflective of the zoning. The access to the site -- if we take a look at the site plan, the access to the site is from two unrestricted curb cuts off of the New York State Page 80 94 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 O1 09Planning.txt road, and one unrestricted curb cut off of Depot Lane. Unrestricted means that the turn movements could go in and out in any direction. okay. From the point of view of the staff analysis, the staff believes that the proposal is an over-intensification of the use of the subject property. First and foremost, the subject site is not in conformance with the minimum lot size of the hamlet business zone. There is a typo in the staff report, I just want to point that out, on the second page. The tract of the area is .42 acres, not 4.24 acres. So the tract of the property is .42 acres, and the minimum lot size is 20,000 square feet; not in conformance. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 95 secondly, the proposed multiple use is a poor configuration. The combination of unrestricted mu]tiple curb cuts and the ability for mu]tidirectiona] cuing lends the site to a haphazard motor vehic]e circu]ation. You can almost see that if there is a -- a demand for gasoline at any one time, that the cuing can actua]]y wind up on the street. This shows that al] the Page 81 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt cars are cuing in one direction, southbound, but actually they can come in from any direction. okay. So this could cause a -- pose a potentially significant impact, and decrease the safety and efficiency and the traffic carrying capacity of the state right-of-way. The northern-most curb cut to Main Street, in staff's option, should be closed and all motor vehicle traffic to the site from Main Street -- Main Street should be an ingress only, which would be coming into the site. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 The curb cut to Depot Lane, in staff's opinion, should be pulled further west from the intersection for motor vehicle safety reasons. This is -- as you can see from the photos when we get to them, this is an awfully wide access as you pull into the site. But if cars do fill up on this side and then want to get out into the intersection, that's awfully close to this intersection (indicating). We believe that this should be closed up and there should be a better access point further back, which would impact the locations of those parking lots, Page 82 96 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt which we'll address in a minute (indicating). Okay. The curb cut to Depot Lane should be pulled further west as indicated. In addition, the southwestern pump island has no exit for motor vehicles and would require the vehicles to have to negotiate a U-turn on the site. We believe that this pump 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 97 island should be eliminated. So if cars come in, they cue up, they fill up here and they have to leave, they're going to have to do a u-turn in order to get out of the site. CHAIRNAN CALONE: where are the pumps -- there's two pumps, Andy? There's two islands? MR, FRELENG: There's a pump island here, and a pump island here (indicating). There's two pumps on either side -- you know, there's one pump -- CHAIRMAN CALONE: TWO pumps. MR. FRELENG: -- for service on each side, same here, and that would go on each side to this one pump right here (indicating). okay. Adding to the poor motor Page 83 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt vehicle circulation issues is the proposed use of the building for an on-site retail store. The parking for the retail store is in a location that would require pedestrians on the 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1S 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 northern side of the store approaching the building entrance to negotiate with motor vehicles entering and exiting the site from Depot Lane. So if you have somebody coming in for -- to get a bottle of soda or something like that, or they're walking from here to here, or however they do that, they're going to have to watch out for cars moving in and out of the site (indicating). So that's not necessarily a good thing for pedestrians. Zn addition, the western pump island, if somebody's coming to make a u-turn here, and you have somebody parked here, again, trying to get to the entrance of the building into the retail store, again, pedestrians are and motor vehicles are going to have to negotiate with each other, in this area here (indicating). We feel that's an unsafe condition, and, frankly, we believe that this pump island should be eliminated for both the reasons of conflicting with Page 84 98 04 01 09Planning.txt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 pedestrians as well as the u-turn that would have to be negotiated. so staff is recommending a . disapproval of the site plan. The first reason for disapproval is the proposal's an unwarranted over-intensification of the use of the premises. The paragraph which follows is an excerpt from the staff analysis. The second reason for a disapproval would be that the proposal would tend to diminish the safety and traffic-carrying capacity of the New York State Route 25. Again, for the haphazard cuing arrangements and the possibility, on a high-demand day, the cuing could actually wind up into the state right-of-way. And the last reason for disapproval is that the site plan design of the proposed multiple use is a poor configuration, and we believe that the -- if indeed there would be a retail store here, there would be a much better 99 1 2 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 way to design this site. Page 85 100 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt So staff is recommending to the commission a disapproval. CHAIRMAN CALONE: Okay. Thank you, Andy. This is a Southold project. Mr. McAdam, do you have comments on the ~rea? COMMISSIONER MCADAM: I -- I first want to say that I'm a customer, but I'm not -- I'm just a regular customer. CHAIRMAN CALONE: 3USt like anyone else;right? COMMISSIONER MCADAM: I just -- I just wanted to point out that I think that pump on the side there is a diesel pump, and not only is it going to be a problem for a car if -- if they diesel, but the trucks are never going to get in there, so -- CHAIRMAN CALONE: How do they get in there now? COMMISSIONER MCADAM: They don't. what -- I guess I can say this. 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 101 what happened is they finished the project, and they didn't really have approval for it. So they can't -- right now that pump -- that diesel pump, they can't use it. The only pump they can use is this main island over here Page 86 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 O1 09Planning.txt (indicating), and the convenience store, they can't use the convenience section, they can only use the office area for the gas station. CHAIRMAN CALONE: SO they built the thing -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Yes. CHAIRMAN CALONE: -- but they didn't get -- COMMISSIONER McADAM: Yes. CHAIRMAN CALONE: -- didn't do what they were supposed to do. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: Well -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Yes. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: -- that was my question. CHAIRMAN CALONE: SO let me -- let me -- one second. 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 102 DO you have anything else you want to say about the area -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Yes. CHAIRMAN CALONE: -- from the southo]d perspective? COMMISSIONER McADAM: That there is another convenience store next to it, which I won't mention the name, but they have a driveway right next to the other driveway coming out. so -- Page 87 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt CHAIRMAN CALONE: okay. Andy, you want to show us that, if you can. I don't know if it -- MR. FRELENG: Yeah, that's right here (indicating). COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Yeah, there's a driveway right there, and then there's another driveway right next to it. So -- and then there's a farm stand right across the street~ which I won't mention that name either, but that's a very active -- CHAIRMAN CALONE: You -- you could -- I think you could mention them. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Okay. I wasn't sure if we could or not. CHAIRMAN CALONE: It's not anonymous, is it? (Laughter) COMMISSIONER MCADAM: BUt it's a very active farm stand. CHAIRMAN CALONE: All right. Suffice to say, it's an active farm stand. COMMISSIONER HOLMES: For the past 300 years. CHAIRMAN CALONE: SO, therefore, the -- the road is -- you know, traffic, and particularly in the summer, I would Page 88 103 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt imagine -- COMMISSIONER McADAM: Yes. CHAIRMAN CALONE: -- too. Andy, did you want to run through -- point out anything in the pictures? MR. FRELENG: We can run through the pictures real quick, sure. MR. CORRAL: (Complying) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1S 16 17 18 19 20 1 2 3 4 5 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 104 MR. FRELENG: This would be where the proposed parking is going to be on the north side of the site (indicating). This is where their -- their filling points are (indicating). If we go to the next slide -- MR. CORRAL: (Complying) MR. FRELENG: -- we're -- we're on Depot Lane looking at the site. This is the main road right here (indicating). We were there about 12:30, 1 o'clock, so it really wasn't that busy at the time, but this is the -- the building as constructed (indicating). We did not know that it was constructed for a convenience store when we were there, but you can see a pedestrian actually going back and forth (indicating). Page 89 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt Next slide. MR. CORRAL: (Complying) MR. FRELENG: This is looking at Main Road and Depot Lane (indicating), this is the -- this is the southern end 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 2] 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 of that curb cut (indicating). And there's really maybe only one car length. So if there is traffic coming -- cuing up to get through the intersection, this could be problematic if somebody wants to get in. Next slide. MR. CORRAL: MR. FRELENG: (Complying) Again, this is from Depot Lane looking at the site (indicating). We tried to get a bunch of cars in there, but we couldn't quite get it. while we were there, there was some conflicts in the -- in motor vehicle turning and going in and out, but by the time we got the camera up to take it, they were already gone. COMMISSIONER HOLMES: And this was in the off-season; right? MR. FRELENG: This is the off-season, and this is -- you know, there's no gas shortage, there are no gas lines, there's no, you know, gas sale going on that day or anything like Page 90 04 01 09Planning.txt 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 106 that. And gas is still pretty reasonable, considering we were way out in cutchogue. Next slide. MR. CORRAL: (Complying) MR. FRELENG: This probably is the most congestion we could get at the time we were there. There was a -- a truck in the back here blocking the access coming in, and we had some folks fueling up (indicating). And we noted at the time that these pumps were blocked off and not being used (indicating). Next slide. MR. CORRAL: MR. FRELENG: (Complying) I thought at the time I was there it was because it was problematic trying to maneuver around the side, but now we learned that they did not have the approval for those pumps. That's all the photos; right? MR. CORRAL: Yeah. MR. FRELENG: That's all the suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 photos. Page 91 107 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt COMMISSIONER BRAUN: (Indicating) CHAIRMAN CALONE: Okay. Mr. Braun. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: Yeah, is -- is -- the way I read the staff report, in the first place, was that this was an existing repair shop that they converted -- they are converting or have converted to a convenience store. MR. FRELENG: Right. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: Are the pump is]ands different than what was there previously? MR. FRELENG: NOt -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Yeah. MR. FRELENG: -- according to the site'p]an, but I don't know. CHAIRMAN CALONE: Tom, what do you -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Yeah, they remodeled the whole -- COMMISSIONER BRAUN: I mean, there may be different pumps, but are they in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 different places7 COMMISSIONER MCADAM: The pump is in about the same place, they're new pumps, and they put in new tanks also. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: Right. COMMISSIONER MCADAM: SO there's Page 92 108 $ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 04 01 09Planning.txt new tanks, new pumps. They -- they reconstructed the whole site. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: I guess the basis of my question is, if we were to recommend that this be disapproved and the town was to agree with us, they would still have -- be able to use those -- if the islands and the gas -- the regular gasoline island is in the same place where it always was -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: COMMISSIONER BRAUN: already have that use. COMMISSIONER MCADAM: COMMISSIONER BRAUN: or don't -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: well, no -- -- they DO they not Yeah, the main island -- the main island has -- 1 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 109 is -- is -- hasn't changed. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: Right. COMMISSIONER MCADAM: BUt the one on the side is -- COMMISSIONER BRAUN: The one -- the diesel -- that you discussed -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: The diesel is new -- COMMISSIONER BRAUN: -- is the diesel, Page 93 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt COMMISSIONER MCADAM: -- yeah. CHAIRMAN CALONE: And that's the one that Andy said is the big problem anyway. COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Yeah, COMMISSIONER BOLTON: Yeah. COMMISSIONER HOLM£5: (Indicating) CHAIRMAN CALONE: Okay. Commissioner Ho]mes. COMMISSIONER HOLMES: 3USt to note, as Tom knows very we]], and probab]y Constantine knows, this is an extreme]y popular gas station as it is, because they tend to undercut the price of other 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 110 gasoline stations in the area. So it just makes it more problematic, when you were seeing the potential problems in the dead of winter, you can just picture, you know, what it would be like in the busy season. So I can understand the concern. CHAIRMAN CALONE: Thank you. Any other comments -- COMMISSIONER TALDONE: (Indicating) CHAIRMAN ~ALONE: vince. COMMISSIONER TALDONE: A quick question. Do we know if they had an alterations permit from the town to do Page 94 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 O1 09Planning.txt this work, or they just -- just went to work? MR. FRELENG: staff wasn't aware of it. we -- we got this as a proposed site plan. When we got there, I presumed that this was the service -- service garage here (indicating), so we did not know that they actually had reconstructed the site prior to us being 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O Suffolk County Planning commission 4/1/09 there. COMMISSIONER HOLMES: And they didn't get a permit from the town either? MR. FRELENG: We weren't aware of that. COMMISSIONER HOLMES: Better to ask for forgiveness than permission. CHAIRMAN CALONE: In this case, that may not be true -- COMMISSIONER BRAUN: It may not be true, CHAIRMAN CALONE: -- SO we']] see. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: I just have one -- CHAIRMAN CALONE: Commissioner Braun. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: -- one quick -- one really quick question. Page 95 111 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt In general, do we have any understanding that people visit gas stations to use the convenience store more frequently than they would have visited it just to get gas or to use the 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 112 repair shop? In other words, is there traffic studies that show when you make this kind of conversion, you have additional traffic? MR, FRELENG: No, I don't have any clerical data on that that would -- that would substantiate that conclusion; however, anecdotally, I know that when I travel and -- or when people travel and they want to stop for a drink or something, if you see a convenience store, you know, by a gas station, you may make a special trip there. COMMISSIONER BOLTON: How about the -- CHAIRMAN CALONE: Right. Commissioner Bo]ton. COMMISSIONER BOLTON: -- Institute for Traffic Engineers, do they have any sort of -- where they show a gas station versus a gas station with a convenience store? DIRECTOR ISLES: Yes. We've researched that a little bit, but it's a Page 96 04 01 09Planning.txt 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 113 little inconclusive on the data that we saw, Andy, last week when we were reviewing this. MR. ERELENG: That is true. we did take a look at the ITE manual, and it was inconclusive and did not seem to make sense, what the ITE reported was that it was actually less trip generation to the site overall when they added the convenience store than when they did not have the convenience store. COMMISSIONER BOLTON: And they didn't state any particular reason for that conclusion? MR. FRELENG: They did not state any particular reason why, so -- DIRECTOR ISLES: It was dated -- MR. FRELENG: Yes. DIRECTOR ISLES: -- it was going back to the mid-'9Os, so we're not sure how appropriate it is today with current patterns of shopping and trips. MR. FRELENG: SO we didn't believe that that was sufficient enough factual 1 2 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 data. Page 97 114 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt COMMISSIONER BOLTON: Okay. CHAIRMAN C. ALONE: Okay. Any other comments, questions -- COMMISSIONER KELLY; (Indicating) CHAIRMAN C. ALONE: -- considerations? Mr. Kelly. COMMISSIONER KELLY: How close is the next service station or gas station? MR, FRELENG: I'm not quite sure. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: Tom, do you know? COMMISSIONER MCADAM: Mattituck. COMMISSIONER KELLY: SO it's a good trip. CHAIRMAN CALONE: My -- my take on this is that the issue would not be, probably, replacing -- I mean, if there already was a gas station there, most likely the way this plays out is that aspect is kept; but probably the diesel -- COMMISSIONER MCADAM: The diesel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 and -- 'CHAIRMAN CALONE: be a problem. COMMISSIONER MCADAM: The diesel and the convenience store is the additional -- Page 98 115 -- you know, may 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09Planning.txt CHAIRMAN CALONE: Are the issues, right. COMMISSIONER MCADAM: -- yeah, the issues. And that's the part that's not open right now. I -- I don't want to say that they didn't have a permit or anything for it, but what I do know is that the diesel pump is shut down and the convenience store is not operating. CHAIRMAN CALONE: Right. COMMISSIONER MCADAM: I can tell you that. CHAIRMAN CALONE: Okay. All right. MR. FRELENG: Just from the staff's perspective, if the site was redesigned, they could make it work. But as proposed, it is a poor design. COMMISSIONER BO[TON: It is. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 116 CHAIRMAN CALONE: Okay. COMMISSIONER MCADAM: (Indicating) CHAIRMAN CALONE: Commissioner McAdam. COMMISSIONER McADAM: I'll move the report. CHAIRMAN CALONE: Mr. McAdam moves -- COMMISSIONER BOLTON: I'll second it. Page 99 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 04 01 09P~anning.txt CHAIRMAN ~ALONE: -- approval of the staff report. Seconded by Commissioner Bolton. All in favor of approving the staff report for disapproval for the reasons indicated in the staff report, please raise your hand. (WHEREUPON, the members voted.) CHAIRMAN [ALONE: It's ten. All opposed? (WHEREUPON, there was no response.) CHAIRMAN [ALONE: Zero, and no abstentions. We have one recusal on the matter. 2 3 4 $ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 suffolk County Planning Commission 4/1/09 okay. The next item and the last item on our agenda is -- on the regulatory agenda is an item out of southampton. 9ohn will be presenting this to us, so thank you, ]ohn, Be sure to speak up. MR. CORRAL: Yup. CHAIRMAN CHAIRMAN: Mr. Braun will speak down. COMMISSIONER BRAUN: I'll shut up. (Laughter) MR. CORRAL: Okay. on this one, the applicant's seeking Town Planning Board Approval for a major seven-lot clustered subdivision on a 14.9-acre lot Page 100 117 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE April 1, 2009 Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11925 Att: Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Re: Application of"Valero Service SCTM No.: 1000-10200-0500-026000 SCPC FileNo.: SD-09-04 Dear Ms. Winser: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 thru 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on April 1,2009 reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation resolved to Disapprove the action for the following reasons: 1. Proposal is an unwarranted over-intensification of the use of the premises: The subject site is not in conformance with the minimum lot size of the HB zone. The addition of the retail component to the site would further intensify the use of the site by potentially adding destination only trips to the retail store and increasing the motor vehicle trip generation at this intersection. 2. Proposal would tend to diminish the safety and traffic carrying capacity of the NYS Rte. 25: The combination of unrestricted multiple curb cuts and the ability for multi-directional cuing lends the site to a haphazard motor vehicle circulation pattern. As is demonstrated in the submitted plan, cuing of motor vehicles can back up into the curb cuts and potentially cause motor vehicles to cue into the State R.O.W. thereby potentially decreasing the safety, efficiency and traffic carrying capacity of the State road. The northern-most curb cut to Main Street (NYS Rte. 25) should be closed and all motor vehicle traffic to the site from Main LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 Street should be ingress only. 3. The site plan design of the proposed multiple use is a poor configuration: The south-western pump island has no exit for motor vehicles and would require the vehicles to have to negotiate a "U" turn on the site. This pump island should be eliminated. Adding to the poor motor vehicle circulation issues is the proposed use of the building on site for a retail store. The parking for the retail store is in a location that would require pedestrians on the northern side of the store approaching the building entrance to negotiate with motor vehicles entering and exiting the site from Depot Lane and thereby being an unsafe situation. Moreover, the location of the western pump islands require pedestrians parking on the westem property line to negotiate with motor vehicles "U" turning from fueling at those filling pumps; again an unsafe condition for pedestrians walking to the front entrance of the building. Very truly yours, Thomas A. Isles Chief Planner APF:ds LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 STATe OF NEW YOrK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 250 Veterans MeMorial Highway HAUPPaUgE, New YORk 11788 www. nysdot,gov SUI31MAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR ASTRID C. GLYNN COMMISSIONEr March 5, 2009 Mr. William Lahti, P.E Lahti Engineering, PC 207Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Town's February 12, 2009 Submission Valero Service Station Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM 1000-10200-0500-026000 Our Case No. 09-053P Dear Mr. Lahti: This is to acknowledge receipt of plan submission for the above permit applisation: We are in the process of reviewing this submission. When our review is complete, we will notify you by letter to provide you with further information in this matter. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point. and from Route 25 or 1-495. {whichever is farther southl, to Long Island Sound in the north. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973 at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County Tax Map Number in all correspondence. Thank you for the opportunity to review this development and for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE March 24, 2009 THOMAS A. ISLES, A.I.C.P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11935 Att: Ms. Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner Re: Application of "Valero Service Station" Zoning Action: Site Plan/Change of Zone SCTM No: 1000-10200-0500-026000 SCPC File No: SD-09-04 Dear Ms. Winser Please be advised that pursuant to Sections A 14-14 to 24 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above captioned application which has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission will be reviewed by the Commission at its regular meeting on Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 12:00 p.m. in the Suffolk County Legislative Auditorium, at 725 Veterans Memorial Highway in Hauppauge. The regular meetings of the Suffolk County Planning Commission are open meetings pursuant to the NYS Open Meetings La,v, they are not public hearings. Any request to address the Planning Commission on any matter including subdivision or zoning referrals must be submitted prior to the meeting. Each request shall be submitted on a card (distributed before the regular meeting) identifying the person and/or organization and topic. During the public portion of the regular meeting each speaker shall be allotted three (3) minutes. An individual who has requested the opportunity to address the Planning Commission may relinquish his/her time to another speaker. However, no speaker may speak for more than six (6) minutes. In accordance with Suffolk County Planning Commission Policy, any information to be submitted to the Planning Commission will not be accepted at the meeting unless it has been acknowledged by the local referring municipality. The information must be accompanied with a letter from the local referring municipality describing such contents, as well as, instructions for treating previously submitted material. This policy was instituted to avoid confusion as to which information is being reviewed by all agencies. Should you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact this office. Chief Planner TAI:ds cc: 88 Realty Corp. LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788~0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner, Town of Southold s' Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold · Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Wendy Brodsky, Long Island North Shore Heritage Area Planning Commission SAS:MT:ajf 2009-02-27 13:21 N R BRAS 6317346235 >> SOUTIIO1A) qq,~A N8I'()RTATION COMMISSION P 2/2 TO: Heather Laaza Director of Planning FROM: Neboysha R Bra*hich Chairman DATE: February 26, 2009 RE: Val~o Service Station P~oject $CTM #: 1000-102-5-26 Furtl~ to th~ memorandum ,~at~ February 12 I~-parcd by Kristy Winser, the Commission reviewed subject project proposal at ils February 23 meeting. The Conunission has thc following comments: · ,~asmm ~ on NYS Rout~ 25 should be a 16 fect"enmmce only" · Woata'n access on NYS Route 25 should be a 16 feet exit "right turn only" · Curb cut and e~ttance on Depot Lane should be narrowed to 24 feet closest to the corner, keeping it as close to the pi'oposcd parking ar~ as po~iblc · Comer ~re a~ well ns mens along NYS Route 25 should be landscaped · TV advcrtwing should be eliminat~l at thc p~mps As ~ou ~re awm, S~ Rou~e 25 is a designated NYS sc~ i~'y."Wi request ~'~he proposed projcct maintain a scenic quality of the site. ._ Cc: Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Southold County Planning Commission Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4:O0p.m., February la, 3009 Town Hall Annex Executive Board Room Members Present: Sandford Hanauer, Chairman; Elizabeth, T-h~,.ej~aps~0-md~erbert'El~gtT~:' . ~ Joseph Lee; Ronald McGreevy; Nicholas Planamento; Mark Schwartz; Heather Lanz~ Planning Director; Kristy Winser, Planner; Elizabeth Cantrell. ~:(~ ii~ '~--~!1 The minutes for the January ~, ~009 meeting were approve ~~~1 Introduction. ~_ . ..........~-~ All apphcants will give a presentation consisting of drawings, exttrior ~r~ateri~s sambas an~.E~ other information required by the Planning Department to the Co}aamit4q;~v-T~' C0nimittee wdl ask questions and make suggestions as part of a general discussion w~.appti~~ F~nal recommendations from the ARC wall be presented to thd P at~nmng Board ~n the ARC Meeting Minutes, and be made part of the Planning file for that application. The Planning Board will consider these recommendations, together with all comments from other agencies, and provide the applicant with a comprehensive written list of its requested revisions. New.Applications Joint Board Electrical Industry SCTM #10oo-83-~-17.$ Louis Giacalone, R.A., Architect and Patricia C. Moore, Esq., Attorney presented this project to the Committee. The Committee recommends this project is acceptable as submitted. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. Valero Service Station SCTM # 1000-10~-5-~6 Geane Buccellato, owner & Rob Chase, partner presented this project to the committee. The Committee is recommending the following modifiqations to the current prqject plan: o No internally lit signage anywhere on the property, canopy or building. o The use of Dark Sky compliant goose-neck style lighting fixtures. o Replace all lighting fixtures around the fuel pumps with Dark Sky compliant goose-neck style fixtures. o The fuel canopy mimics the style of the hip roof on the building, or something in the style of the attached photos. o Reduce the size of the proposed 5'x8' street fuel sign to be no more than 6 feet in height. o Removal of the advertisement monitors of top of each pump. Not dark sky compliant. O Increase the plantings on the northerly and westerly sides of the property including deciduous and conifer vegetation. To help break up the nearly continuous pavement areas of this property and 7-11. Also, the plantings will create additional buffer between residence and this property on the north side. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. A motion was made to close the meeting at 5:5op.m. All in favor. Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Date: Re: LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDIN&TOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B Woodhouse, Chair MM i rmkb~ reS OrryI the;fio~iyii~p~laannnnj~ g~d LWRP Coordinator February 11, 2009 Proposed Site Plan for Valero Service Station -~" This site is located on the n/w comer of Main Road and Deport Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM #1000 102.-5-26 Zone: HB This proposed site plan is for the conversion of an existing 1,206 sq. ft. automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a 1,206 sq. ft. convenience store anCgasoline service station on a 18,473 sq. ft lot in the Hamlet Business (HB) Zoning District. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the Planning Board consider the following recommendations in site design: It is recommended that the following best management practice be applied to further Policy 5, "Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold": 1. Require that all landscaped areas use native, drought tolerant vegetation to minimize irrigation. It is recommended the applicant replace the callery pear and catawaba rhododendron with species indigenous to the area. 2. Prohibit the use of synthetic fertilizers and herbicides on the parcel. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Planning Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its ~witten determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Kristy Winsor, Senior Planner File PLANNING BOARI) MEMBERS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD ~' To: Jerilyn B Woodhouse~ Chair Members of the Southold Plannin Bo.5~l- From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator MAll.lNG Al)DRESS: ILO, Box 1179 Si)ut hold, NY 11971 OFFICE I-OCATION: Town flail Annex 54:175 State Route 25 (o)r, Main ltd. & Youngs Ave./ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 7~5-31.'~ Date: Re: February 11,2009 Proposed Site Plan tbr Valero Service Station This site is located on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot L~e: Cutchogue. SCTM #1000 102.-5-26 Zone: HB This proposed site plan is lbr the conversion of an existing 1,206 sq. lt. automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a 1,206 sq. ft. convenience store and gasoline service station on a 18,473 sq. ft lot in the Hamlet Business (HB) Zoning District. The proposed action has been reviewed to New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regulation 6NYCCRR Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review and it is my determination that pursuant to Part 617.5.(c)(7), the action, as proposed, is a Type II action and therefore not subject to SEQRA review. Cc: Kristy Winsor, Senior Planner File PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JER1LYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 6~1 765-3136 February 12, 2009 Mr: Matthew Martin Cutchogue Fire District 260 New Suffolk Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re! Request for review of the Valero Service Station SCTM#1000-102-5~26 Dear Mr. Martin: The enclosed site plan application, referenced above, is being referred to you for your comment on matters of interest to the fire department, including fire department equipment access, emergency services, and any other issue that may be of concern or relevance to this application. Please respond with your recommendations at your earliest convenience. Project Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. This site is located on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue., Please contact me at (631)765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Encls.: Site Plan Application PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B WOODHOUSE (;hair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JGSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To; Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Southold Town Building Department · Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Southold Town Transportation Commission* Suffolk County Planning Commission* From: Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner Date: February 12, 2009 Re: Site plan for Valero Service Station, Catchogne SCTM#1000-102-5-26 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. The file is available at your convenience. Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing 1,206 sq. ft. automotive repair shoP and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning Disirict located on the n/w comer of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue. Thank you for your cooperation. *Encls.: Site Plan PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS - JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING AD DRE~q: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 Icor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold. NY Talephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 63][ 765-3136 February 12. 2009 Mr. Mark Wolfgang New York State Department of Transportation 250 Veterans Memorial Highway H~/uppauge, NY 11788 Re: Comments on the Site Plan for Valero Service Station Located: n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane. Cutchogue. SCTM #: 1000-102-5-26 Zoning District: Hamlet Buisness Dear Mr. Wolfgang: The following site plan is being referred to you for comments: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18.473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. If there are any questions, you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Kristy Wi~ns Senior Planner Eric. 1 site plan Site Plan'Application Environmental Assessment Form PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDER GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 ¢cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: James Richter, Engineering Inspector Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner February 12, 2009 Drainage Review for Site Plan Application Name: Valero ServiCe Station Tax Map Number: 1000-102-5-26 Location: n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue Type of Application: X Road Profiles Grading and Drainage Plans Other Grading and Drainage Plans Other (AS BUILT) (Dated: ) (Dated: ) (Dated: ) (Dated: 1/20/09 ) (Dated: ) Project Description: This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. Thank you for your cooperation. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B, WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D, SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 1!971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Memorandum D~te: RE: To: Sanford Hanauer, Chairman, Southold Town Architectural Review Committee From: Planning Board February 12, 2009 Request for review and comments on site plan known as Valero Service Station SCTM# 1000-102-5 -26 The Planning Board refers this site plan application to your agency for your review and comments. This site is located on the n/w comer of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue. This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. Thank you. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chah' KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold. NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor, Main Rd, & Younffs Ave.} Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-19.38 Fax: 631 765-3136 February 12, 2009 William Lahti, P.E. cio Lahti Engineering 207 Hallock Road, Suite 212 Stony'Brook, NY 11790 Re: Site Plan for Valero Service Station SCTM#1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Lahti: As a follow up to the Work Session on February 3, 2009. the above-referenced site plan was formally accepted for review by the Planning Board and the following actions were taken. Please revise in accordance with the following comments and re-submit directly to the Planning Department: 1. Distribute the 'application to the Town Planning Board, Town departments and involved/interested agencies for their comment. 2. The application is eligible for waiver of site plan elements under § 280-133.C and the Planning Board agreed to waive certain site plan application elements. § 280-133 B. (2) Natural features, and § 208-133B (4) 2 foot contours throughout the site 3. Request the following information from the applicant: Site circulation is inadequate. The site plan does not meet the minimum requirement for a gas station (3 car queues per each gas pump) or show a truck loading area for deliveries. Provide a plan that demonstrates how the gas pump islands and car queue provided will not interfere with on-site circulation and safety. Include a truck template on the plan that will clearly show movement o~ site and associated turning radius. For your convenience, this may be a sketch Site Plan application for Valero, Cutcho.que p.2 drawing submitted. In addition, provide a comparative analYsis of similar sites i.e. Jamesport Valero and any additional information that may support relaxations for these items for the Planning Boards consideration. Additional comments will be provided following full review by Staff, the Town Planning Board, Town departments and involved/interested agencies. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours truly, CC~ Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, February 9, 2009 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. 4:45 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda Site Plans & Subdivisions Subdivisions: Project name: Location: Description: Status: .Action: Attachments: Davidson - Fishers Island Fishers Island , SCTM#:l 1000-12-2-5.3 Site is 11.85 acres, with a single-family residence Open Determine how to streamline subdivision process or request refund of fees none Site Plans: Project name: Location: Description: Valero Service Station ! SCTM#:t 1000-102-5-26 This site is Iocatedon the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, _Cutchogue. . ........................... This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shod and gasoline service station (Citgo) to a 7-11 convenience store on an Action: ~_Attachments: 18,473 sq. ttt. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. Status: I New Site Plan Recommend for the Planning Board to accept the application and start the referral proces§. Staff Repor~ Project name: Location: Southwold Manor SCTM#: 1 1000-63-3-15 in' North side of Main Road, approximately 829' east of Boisseau Avenue, Southold Description: This res dent a site plan is for the proposed construction of a 27~unit active adult condominium community consisting of eight (81 residential multiple dwelling buildings, four buildings with a footprint of 7,573 s.f., and four with a footprint of 7,695 s.f. Each building contains three units ranging in size from 2,700 s.f. to 2,958 s.f. The site plan also includes the conversion of an existing single family residence into three (3) affordable · housing units, one at 891 s.f., and two at 1,121 s.f., a 370 s.f. detached 1 garage, a two-story, 2,246 s.f. amenities building and a swimming pool and deck area covering 2,887 s.f. on a 6.75 acre parcel in the Ham let ................................. B_u s i ~n_e~_s.__Z_~_n_! n_ ~q _E~!_s..!.r i_~.~ Status: , Application accepted with revisions - waiting for the final few application requirements to be submitted as per Janua[7 20, 2009 letter. Attachments: , None 207 Hallock Road, Sui~ 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel(631) 751-6433 Fax(631)751-6434 January 26, 2008 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts Via overnight mail Ms. Kristy Winser Southold Town Hall 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue Dear Ms. Winser: We are in receipt of your comments dated 11/13/08 regarding the above referenced site plan submission. Enclosed, please find (9) copies of the modified site development plans. Your comments have been addressed as follows: 1. The landscaping calculation is shown on drawing SP-4. We have increased the landscaping to the extent possible, i.e. we exceed 25% inclusive of the buffer area. We cannot attain 25% excluding the buffer area. To the extent possible, street trees have been added. We cannot install street trees along Main Street because there is no where to install them (existing curbcuts and canopy). In addition, there are already two street trees planted within the ROW. 3. We have shown the 15 foot buffer along the northwest property line and have added a decorative fence in lieu of evergreen plantings. 4. A lighting plan has been prepared (drawing SP-5). 5. Drainage calculations and plan are shown on drawing SP-3. 6. The fire hydrant is located at the comer of Main and Depot and is now shown on the plans. 7. The proposed fenced refuse enclosure has been added behind the building. 8. All signage is shown on drawing SP-5. 9. A pavement section for on-site work has been shown on drawing SP-6. There are no street improvements proposed. 10. Sawcut lines for the existing pavement are shown on drawing SP-2. Page 2 Town of Southo~d Planning Dept. re: Valero Service Sta~on, Cutchogue 1/26/09 11. The parking stall sizes and dimensions are called out on drawing SP-1. Parking bumpers have been added for the parking stalls atop the underground tank slab because curbing cannot be added to the slab. 12. There is no work proposed within the NYSDOT fight-of-way. 13. The Town's standard notes have been added to drawing SP-1. Please note that the scope of the project, with regard to the property owner's original intentions, was limited to installation of a new fueling island with one dispenser on the south side of the building, and the conversion of the existing building to a convenience store use. No other work was proposed. Upon completion of your review, please direct your comments to my office. Thank you. Sincerely, William J. Lah~/, P.E. doc: 08043t02 Town PB PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND November l3,2008 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Lahti Engineerring Attn: William Lahti, P.E. 207 Hallock Road Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Re: Site plan for Valero Service Station SCTM# 1000-102-5-26 Dear Mr. Lahti: As a courtesy we have made the initial review of the above referenced site plan application received October 31, 2008 to establish the completeness of the submission. We have determined that the application is currently incomplete based on the submission requirements for a site plan application for the following reasons stated below. Any comments provided below which go beyond the completeness of the application are provided for your information and consideration. After the Board formally accepts the application, additional comments will be provided following full review by staff, the Town Planning Board, Town departments and involved/interested agencies. · Show landscape calculation and design with planting details (minimum 25% of lot, excluding required buffer zones). Show installation of a hedge, berm and/or decorative fence to screen all parking areas. · Show street tree species and caliper, planted 30 fl on center, min. 5 ft behind right of way property line. · Show a 15-foot buffer zone required wherever the site adjoins residential district or use. Show fencing and/or screening mechanism along n/w property line. Screen planting at a minimum shall consist of a double row of trees six feet in height planted at intervals of 10 feet on center. · Submit lighting plan and detail of lighting fixtures. Show the location direction, Power level and time of use of proposed and existing lighting. Lighting shall be oriented and shielded so as not to illuminate or glare on adjoining properties or roadways. · Submit drainage plans showing drainage calculations for a storage of 2" rainfall for all on-site contributory areas. Show location, size and casting elevations of all proposed and existing drainage structures on site and in street. Roof drainage to be directly connected to storm drainage pools with minimum 6" PVC SDR 35. Site plan application for Valero service station P. 2 Identify location of proposed or nearest existing fire hydrants. · Show location and enclosure detail for refuse. · Show all signage detail proposed and existing on site. · Show cross section detail of on site and street improvements with pavement specifications. · Show existing edges of the pavement to be saw cut prior to paving. · Show parking space and aisle dimensions with parking bumpers. · Submit copy of NYSDOT permit for work within right of way. Approval shall be required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. · Provide standard notes on plan "Contact the Engineering Inspector (765-1560) at least 24 hours prior to start of any work. Work performed without inspection shall be certified to the Engineer's satisfaction at applicant's expense". "Coordinate and complete all utility relocations". Yours truly, Kristy Wins~r Senior Planner cc: Planning Board Heather Lana, Planning Director 207 Ha[lock Road, Suite 212 Stony Brook, NY 11790 Tel (631) 751-6433 Fax (631) 751-6434 William J. Lahti, P.E. New York Virginia Connecticut New Jersey North Carolina Massachusetts October 28, 2008 Ms. Heather M. Lanza, AICP Southold Town Hall 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Via overnight mail Re: Site Plan Application for Valero ~ 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue Dear Ms. Lanza: ................ Enclosed please find the following items associated with our Site Plan application package: 1. Site Plan Application 2. Applicant's affidavit 3. Agent authorization letter 4. Environmental Assessment Form- Part One 5. Filing fee check in the amount of $500 6. (9) copies of alignment, grading, drainage and landscape plan drawings (SP-1, SP-2, SP-3 and SP-4) 7. Copy of survey prepared by Robert Mavrikakis, L.S. 8. (2) copies of building floor plan and exterior elevations 9. Notice of disapproval from building department 10. LWRP Consistency Assessment form Please note that the scope of the project, with regard to the Town Planning Board review, is limited to installation of a new fueling island with one dispenser on the west side of the building, and the conversion of the existing building to a convenience store use. Upon completion of your review, please direct your comments to my office. Thank you. Sincerely., William J. Laht~ P.E. 808 Realty Corp, Cutchogue Se J 280-133 - Site Plan Applicati Checklist Site Plan Name A. Submissi~.ete s_ite lan a Hcation shah consist of: A completed site l~.~_glication fox-ax (2) The site plan review fee, as specified in Subsection B below. Editor's Note: See now § 280-138, Fee schedule fo~lications. assessment form. Nine co iep_~_ofthe site plan. Four co~ certified b_b_y a licensed land B. Standards. Site~ shah include the following items: Technical data: (a) The lot, block and section number of the property, taken from the received latest tax records. The name and address of the landowner on record: The names and addresses of~landowners. (c) (d) (e) [2] The name and address of the applicant, if not the same as.the landowner. The name and address of the person, firm or organ/zation date of readin .~__ A survey prepared by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. The plan may reference a land surveyor's map or base reference map. All distances shall be in feet and hundredths ora foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest I0 seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed one in 10,000. (f) The locations, names and widths of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines. I/none exist within 500 feet of the subject property, indicate the distance to the nearest intersection with a (g) A separate key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet, as shown on the latest tax records, at a scale of one inch ect.mls 100 feet. (h) The location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks, reservations and areas dedicated to public use within or~ A complete outline of other existing easements, deed restrictions covenantsa 1 ~ to the ro err . Erast~~ zone lines and dimensions. Site plans drawn at the scale of one inch equals 20 feet. I/all required information cannot be shown clearly on one plan, the information should be separated as follows: i schedule_.p_lan. the map, sealed with the applicable New York State license seal and Date, graphic scale and North point, whether true or magnetic; if (i) (k) (a) site utilities. Natural features: Existing contours with intervals of two feet or less, referred to mean Co) (c) ounuanes o~any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, tidal bays, saltwater marshes, beaches and all bodies, including wetlands and intermittent streams, perimeter boundaries of shoreline bluffs, dunes and beaches. The location of existing natural features, including but not limited \9 (d) to natural drainage swales, watercourses, wooded areas and wetlands, as defined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Board of Trustees of Southold Town, marshes, ponds, dunes, bluffs, beaches, kettleholes, escarpments, wildlife habitats, flood hazard areas, erosion-prone areas and trees of six inches in diameter at a point three feet above the trunk base. The location of any existing cultural and historical features withhn 500feet ofthero_p_r_9~op_.__e[~boundaries' Site Plan Application Checklist Page Two Existin b~g~_~_g structures and uffi~ties: (a) CO) (c) The locations, dimensions and outlines of all buildings, as defined 1280-4 of this ~and all uses of the site. Paved areas, including parking areas, sid'~walks and vel~cular access between the site and public streets. T~.e locations, dimensions, grades and flow directions of any exasting culverts, waterlines or sewage disposal systems, as well as other underground and aboveground utility poles and utility lines within and adjacent to ~ (d) The location and use of all buildings and structures, including curbcuts_, within 200 feet of the boun~ a: (a) The location of proposed buildings or structural improvements, indicating setbacks from all property lines and hotizontal distances from ex--structures. Co) Thc location and design of all uses not requiring structures, such as ofr-s~__arki~.~ .an. dloadin areasand edestriancircuiation. (c) The location, direction, power level and time of use for any ~ublic address s_,ystems. (d) The location and plans for any outdoor signs must be in accordance ~lations. (e) The location and details of aprons, curbs, sidewalks, fencing (type and location), and grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours (on site and 200 feet beyond the property line) and spot elevations for buildings and ali structures, drainage calculations, details of drainage structures and watershed area~licable. (f) Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site stormwater retention, in conformance with Chapter 161, Highway (g) The location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street tree (h) The ' . t and location. locatmn of water and sewer mares, electrical service, cablevision and telephone installations, ground transformers, fire wells and fire hydrants and/or any alternate means of water supply and sewa e__ag~_~s_~osal and treatment. (i) Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing the ~__._._.__p_~osed use of floor area. Received Comment Notes: Site Plan Application elements waivers: § 280-133 C. Not~. ithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Board shall have the discretion to waive any or all of the reqmrements of this § 280-133 by resolution at a duly noticed public meeting, for those applications involving modifications to existing structures with no substantial change to the existing footprint, where the Planning Board determines that such modifications or any change in use will not require significant changes to existing major site design features, as well as applications involving uses strictly related to agriculture (but excepting retail winery operations), if it determines such requirements are not necessary to protect and maintain the public health, safety, or welfare and to further the objectives set forth in § 280-129. 2 SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED NEW PROJECT NAdVIE: LOCATION: scuM# ~ooo- lo3-- 6- - &~ OWNER NAME: WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE ZOnEr: l~-f2Ozo~2: zo~r~::__ HAMLET: TEL# ( TEL# (,___J APPLICANT NAME: JSE: PROPOgED USE: (an~ ~/f ~q ~ ,BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: S/P REQUIRED y OR N ZBA APPEAL REQUIRED y OR N PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAyS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) ,NOTES: INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: REci~IVED: \O~ AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ &,I0/SF, AMENDED SP: $250, + ,10/SF, AGRIC SP; FLAT .00 X SF=$ ~VORK SESSION (WITHIN 10 DAY', ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS ('/vi IHII~: 0 DAYS OF'REVIEW) DEPARTMENT M2tzP~I/'I'ING 100-254B3 (WITHIN 30 DAYS) DATE AGENCIES: (WITH MAPS=W/p) 'USACOKPS.~,NYSDOT~SCWA~SCPD~SCDPW__~LWKP__ /--- / (TYPE 1: __) :NEG DEC Y OR N, ~,PPROVALS REQUIRED: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES COORDINATOR: '-- ~ ~ ~ ~ OING DEPAR'FMENT OERTIFiCATION, 1~ ~ ~ ~ o':,,,.,,,,.~,O.ERS: ' --1~----------~ --;-;- -,,_:___ . PROJECT SCOPING PLANNING APPLICATIONS Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:30pm Location: ~ Th s site is located on the n/w comer of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue. Description: , This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service i sta.tj~..on.a. ! 8.4'~3 ~q.. f~..!.ot.., n. ~he.ha me~.b~.s..nes, s~n ng D StE. Ct Status: New Site Plan Action: r Review revised site plan and applicants submission including a traffic analysis. Review applicants request to the County to reconsider their original recommendation to deny the project Attachments: Staff Report, Traffic Analysis, and applicants letter addressed to the C0~P~Y W!~ ~he response from t. he.County Project name: Shinn Vineyards J SCTM#: 1000-100-4-3.1 L(~cation: s.(~o~.C), regon Road ~!...~!.6~.:~5~ e/o ii. Description: ~ Proposed site plan for the as-built construction of four (4) buildings includ ng a 1,646 sq. ft. wine making and wine tasting building with 336.3 sq. ft. of deck, a 2,730 sq. ft. wine storage barn, an 884.1 sq. ft. , accessory storage building and a 206.1 sq. ft. frame shed on a 53,078 i sg. ft. parcel in the Agricultural Conservation District. Status: Site Plan Review Action: Review applicant's subm ss on Attachments: Staff Report SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: Site Plan Name: Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 102 Other SCTM #s: 10 / 28 / 2008 Valero Service Station 5 26 Street Address: 28975 Route 25 Hamlet: Distance to nearest intersection: 0 Ft to Deoot Lane Cutcho~ue Type of Site Plan: X New Amaended If Amended, last approval date: / / Residential SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and?hone number for the people below: Property Owner 808 Realty Corp. Street P.0. Box 1006 City. Westhampton Beach Zip_ 11978 Home Telephone 288- 0281 ;, ' State N Y Other Applicant 808 Realty Corp. Street P.O. Box 1006 City_ Westhampton Beach State NY Home Telephone 2 8 8 - 0 2 81 Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: ContactPerson(5)* William Lahti, P.E./ Lahti Engineerinq Street 207 Hallock Road Suite 212 City Stony Brook State NY .Zip 11790 Office Telephone 751-6433 Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence wilt be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 1 of 2 10/05/05 SECTION C: Site Data PropoSed construction type: New Property total acreage or square footage: Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: Modification of Existing Structure Change of use X 0.424 a~ __~Aghcultural Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ If yes, explain: No X Property Zoning District(s): Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 7 / 1 7 / 0 8 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes __ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes __ No __ If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No X Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: List all proposed property uses: Other accessory uses: If more then one use is service station; Repair garage service station; Retail store Existing lot coverage: 6.5 % Proposed lot coverage:. 6.5 % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): 1 2 0 6 sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): 1206 Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: 6 # of proposed spaces: 9 Loading Berth: Yes__ No X Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage:. 1.7 % Proposed landscape coverage: 1 3.8 % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes No X If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify that all the above information is tree. Signature of Preparer: //A)~,..' /// /~.~71~'- Date: '/' Page 2 of 2 10/05/05 808 Realty Corp. P O Box 1006 Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Telephone # (631) 288-0280 Fax # (631) 288-0282 I Eugene Buccellato, Vice President of 808 Realty Corp., hereby authorize William Lahti of Lahti Engineering to act as my agent on the property of SCTM #1000-102-5-26 in Southold, NY, and handle all necessary work involved in the permitting process with the Southold Planning Board. Sworn to me this ~$ day of~ ( Notary Public URSULA BUCCELLATO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF NEW YORK 0tBU466318t QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 30, c:~c::7 0 APPLICANTS AFFIDAVTT ~STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~--¢~_%~.,,. ~,~ c~_~,%~-%~ being duty sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in U~e State of New 'York, and [hal lie ts the owner of ~e above properb/, or ~at he is the - (Spec[~ whether P~ne~hlp or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the tiUe to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submlLdced, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical ImprovementS will be Installed in strict accordance With the plans submitted. Slgnqd (Partner or Co~porate Officer and Sworn to me this. 7 ~0 ~u~llc) URSULA BUCCELLATO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF NEW YORK 01BU4663181 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 30, ~. O! O FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 17, 2008 TO: 808 Realty Corp. PO Box 1006 Westhampton Beach, NY 11798 Please take notice that your application dated June 27, 2008 For permit to convert an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station use at Location of property: 28975 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 102 Block5 Lot 26 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this conforming 21,279 square foot parcel in the Hamlet Business District (HB), pursuant to Article XXIV, Section 280-127, requires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. A Stop Work Order was issued by this department on July 1~ 2008~ when it was discovered that the applicant was working outside the scope of the existing building permit #33893Z {by converting an existing, building, to a convenience store). The stop work order was lifted on July 2~ 2008~ when the applicant applied to the building department for a "convenience store" and agreed only to operate a tation until proper approvals were obtained. : [~lgna~ur~ Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board JUL { 8 2008 ~Ti~RM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 17, 2008 TO: 808 Realty Corp. PO Box 1006 Westhampton Beach, NY 11798 Please take notice that your application dated .Lune 27, 2008 For permit to convert an existing automotive cepai~ shop and gasoline ser.,ice station to a convenience store and gasoline service station use at Location of property: 28975 Main Road, Cutcho~g,,e. ~q_Y_ County Tax Map No. I000 - Section 10.__2 Block ~ Lot 26 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this conforming 21,279 square foot parcel in the Hamlet Business District (HB). pursuant to Article XXIV, Section 280-127, requ_ir_e~ site plan approval from the Southold Iown Planning Board. A Stop Work Order was issued by this department on ~luly Iv 2008~ when it was discovered that the applicant was working outside the scope of the existing building permit #33893Z {by converting an existing building to a convenience store). The stop work order was lifted on July 2~ 2008~ when the applicant applied to the building department for a "convenience store" and agreed only to operate a aaso~-ce, station until proper approvals were obtained. ~rized S i ~.?._e Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board .SITE PLAN USE DETERMi~I.ON! 4 aX~ ,,~,,~ ~]~ Initial' Determination Date: ProjectAddres~~ ~ ~ Q~ Couatylax Map ~o.:~000- I~ - ~ - ~Zonlno ~istdct: ~ Suffolk (Note ~py of Building Permit Apphca0o& and sure, rig documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submiEed.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permiEed: U~ ~¢~ Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required:~.~ Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / / S ig da't~ (:~uil ~(~g Inspector Date of Comment: Comments: Final Determination Date: / / Decision: Signature of Planning Dept. Staff Rewewer Signature of Building Inspector FOR INTERNAL USE ON SITE PLAN USE DETERMI Initial Determination E)ate: ~- / II /~' Project Name: Project Addres,~ Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000. It~ - ~ - O*~-(~Zoning District: 4t-~--~ Request:~J~_ .\72~"~ t"~_.~_~. ~(~ ~ ~ ~V~~ ~ ~ ~[~(Note: ~b~%f E~ng Pbrm~t ~pplicati~& ~n~su~o~n~ d~c~e~ation as to proposed use or uses should be submiAed.) Initial Determination as to whether use is pertained: ¢~ ~¢~ Sigr~a'tur~' ~uild~g Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: '-~ / ~_! ~.)~ Date of Comment: 7 / ]~ / ~ Comments: Signature of Pl_~agfling Dept. Staff Reviewer Final Determination Date: ¢ ~/_ ! 7 / t2<¢ Signature of Bu~l~l~g Insp~or TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 SoutholdTown. NorthFork.net Examined ,20__ Approved Disapproved a/c ,20 Expiration ,20___ "~: PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Do you have or need the following, before applying? Board of Health 4 sets of Building Plans Planning Board approval Survey_ Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Flood Permit Storm-Water Assessment Form Contact: Mail to: ~O~ Phone:_F,, 3 t ~[ ;~" O ~- ~' ~ 117q'°~' Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date INSTRUCTIONS du,~ ~-~ ,200o~ a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule· b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. ~e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a~ Certificate of Occupancy. · f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. (Si~ature of aJ~ficant or name, if a corporation) (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contrac_tor, electrician, plumber or builder Name of owner of premises /~O ~ ~ ~ ~ 'r x/ C,_ O ~ (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If appft is a co~ation, si~amre of duly authorized officer t o*~0 ~ ~9 =d tiff co,orate offic=) BuildersLicenseNo. GuFF, ~ ~ Plumbers License No. /fL/p ~ ~ O Elec~ci~s License No. Other Trade's License No. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section Subdivision ~ Block tPOo ~' Filed Map No._~ Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existinguseandoccupancy ~oa~'~t~a~ $<r,4~rla~/ ~- / b. Intended use and occupancy 3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Repair ?la/~ ~t ~¢- Removal Demolition 4. c5 - / Addition Other Work Alteration Estimated Cost ,¢ / rO-O-~ If dwelling, number of dwelling units If garage, number of cars Fee (Description) (To be paid on filing this application) Number of dwelling units on each floor If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. ~o~Ptce g¢,~Tto,¢ 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Height Number of Stories Rear Depth Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size oflot: Front / '7~'/ Rear / 'p~ Depth ~Oo ' 10. DateofPurchase N~v. lq Se~ NameofFormerOwner f?,O~v-~'¢ Il Rear 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES __ NO 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES __ NO ~4 Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO y' p.o Ioo~ 14. Names of Owner of premises~Address ~, 14-~-t4f>ro,,' ~:,4g, Phone No. Name of Architect iJ). "rhto&~) io ~t-e~ Address3'7 Peec)ttota~,/>g~rr~PhoneNo ~3i it,-~?. /Tq~ NameofContractorPrv*4~g,V~ O~atPnlztcTta~/ Address I~l ~ I d- ~4~ee~& PhoneNo. g$/ ,~tt~O~a/bl~tt~ ~ tlTr~ 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES __ NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES NO "/ · IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF ~b~-ae~/t> K~,,~.4Cq~tv~5 tw ~t'w5 being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Nme of individual si~ing contract) above named, (S)Heisthe ~c~o~ ~ ~I~M¢ ~ C~~to~ /M~. (Contractor, Agent, Co,orate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to peffo~ or have peffo~ed the said work and to make ~d file t~s application; that all statements contain~ in t~s application ~e tree to the best of his ~owledge ~d belief; and that the work will be peffomed in the ~er set fo~h in the application filed therewith. Sworn.to before me t~s /~ dayof ~Q~ 20 ~ ~USAN ~ ~ota~ ~ublic ...... ' N~. 01MA6083348 Si~t~e of ~; Qualified in Suffolk Coun~ Commission Expires November 12, 20~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 SoutholdTown. NorthFork.net Examined ,20__ Approved Disapproved a/c ,20__ Expiration 20__ !1 PERMIT NO. BUILDING{~RMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Do y'~'have or need the.following, before applying? Board of Health 4 sets of Building Plans Planning Board approval Survey ', Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Flood Permit Storm-Water Assessment Form Contact: Mail to: ~ p.o.~. ~o¢ L~. l~t~t>r~,~ Phone:~,.,:~j ~.~'~ ~ ~. ~' 1- Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date INSTRUCTIONS du ~'I~ g~ ,20Oo~ a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection tbxoughout the work. ¢. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues ~ Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, ad&tions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. (Si~ature of a~l~qicant or name, if a corporation) (Mailing address of applicant) t/! 74-2 State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contract~oor, electrician, plumber or builder Name of owner of premises /~O ~ ~ ~a/'r-d C ~ g--t~ (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If appli~t is a co~t/ation, signature of duly authorized officer -- ... ~(I'¢~i~e and tit]~f corporate officer) BuildersLicenseNo. ~*FF, .5 ~ 0 ~_ //' Plmnbers License No. /fZLo ~ t4 0 Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section /O ~ Block t~Oo ,q" Lot d)~ ~ Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use anc~ occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existinguseandoccupancy ~o..y'~a- ~.7-~'lo~/ ~- / b. Intended use and occupancy Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Repair irt tx/.~,~t ~,~. Removal Demolition Estimated Cost ,,~/ f~,O"O-C) o-~ Addition Other Work Alteration Fee (Description) (To be paid on filing this application) Number of dwelling units on each floor If dwelling, number of dwelling units If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Height. Number of Stories Rear .Depth Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Depth Height Number of Stories Rear 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Height Number of Stories Rear _Depth 9. Size oflot: Front ! "7~''~ Rear / "2'~~ Depth lOo ' 10. DateofPurchase Nog. lqo~q Name ofFormer Owner ~,O~e,~¢ td tl 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO )t Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES__ NO 14. Names of Owner of premises 730 ~3 geo I+,-/ff, Wt, Address [I), t-~-~ t>ro~' /~£.4g. Phone No. Name of Architect bU. w-ti-t> ILM ~o I~t-t~ t Address'3? Pl~ecy ua,~tt~/heart-Phone No ~* ~.??. /?q~ NameofContractorPrr~4~,vg ~vat~auc-rtvy Address I~l ~.1~'54~& PhoneNo. GS[ 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO ~ * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES · IF YES; PROVIDE A COPY. NO "~ STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF ) · 'a~-~O/t~ ~t4-G/4-a~,~5 tw ~t'a-~ being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named, (S)He is the (Cont.ractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are tree to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn.to J~efore me this ~ Not~ Pubhc No. 01MA~83~ . Si~e of Apphc~ Qualified in Suffolk Coun~ ~ ~ ~ Commission Expires November 12, 20~ ~ ~ Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its si,.vnificant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LW-RP policy standards and conditions, jt shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southotdtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTNI# 102 5 26 PROJECT NAME Valero Service Station The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoard [] Planning Board [~] l~uildingDept. [] BoardofTrustees Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: [~ Nature and extent of action: Applicant seeks to change use of existing repair garage to retail store Location of action: 28975 Site acreage: 0.424 Route 25, Cutchogue Present land use: Gasoline service station and repair garage Present zoning classification: H B If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: 808 Realty Corp. P.O. Box 1006 Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( )_ 631 - 288- 0281 (d) Application number, if any:. Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [~ No [] If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes [--] No [--] Not Applicable Site is already f¥11y developed. Size of building remains unchanged. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes [-~ No [] Not Applicable The site is already fully developed. No historic or archeological significance on site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable' Exterior facade of building is beinq renovated. Landscaping being added to site. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [-~ Yes [-~ No [] Not Applicable No additional development or creation of stormwater runoff area is proposed. Existinq site has stormwater leaching pools. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~-~ No ~ Not Applicable Use as repair gara§e is being converted to less environmentally sensitive use as a retail store. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal l~sh and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes [-~ No ~-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes [~ No ~-~ Not Applicable Repair garage use, which can generate emissions from vehilces beinq services, is beinq chanqed to retail store which does not generate such emissions. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes [-~ No ~-~ Not Applicable Proposed use generates very limited solid waste and does not §enerate hazardous waste like the existing repair garage does. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES .Policy.-10. Protect Southold's~ter-dependent uses and promote si{~ of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes [] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peeonic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable Project reuses an existing fully developed site to provide a service required by Town residents. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable PREPARED BY Amended on 8/1/05 Project EngineerDATE 10/28/08 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full FAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NameofAction Valero Service Station Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 28975 Route 25, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk NameofApplicant/Sponsor 808 Realty Corp. Address P.O. BOX 1006 City/PO Westhampton Beach State NY ZipCode 11978 Business Telephone 631-288-0281 Name of Owner (if different) Address C~yl PO Business Telephone State Zip Code Description of Action: Change of use of existing 1,206 SF building from repair garage to retail store. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban N Industrial ~'~ Commercial []Eorest I--1Agr'oul re []O er [~] Residential (suburban) [~ Rural (non-farm) Total acreage of project area: 0. 424 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agdouitural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc,) Wetland (Freshwater er tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth er fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) Landscapi n§ PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 0.0.~ 4 acres 0 acres 0.363 acres 0.365 acres 0.007 acres 0.059 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: [] Well drained 100 % of site [] Moderately well drained % of site. r']Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? r-'] Yes [] No a. Whet is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r-~0-10% 100 % r-'110.15% % ~ 15% or greater % 6. Is project substantial~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? ~ I Yes ['~ No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? N Yes F~No What is the depth or the water table? 28 (in feet) is site located over a pdmary, principal, or sole source aquifer? r-~Yes [] No NYes [~No 8. 9. 10. DO hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Page 3 of 21 1 1', Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes [] No iccordin~l to: Ider~if~ each species: I 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (ile.i cliffS, OuneS, Other geOlogical formations? r'lves Describe: 13. Is the p~oject site presently used by the communit7 or nei§hbothood as an open space or recreation area? r-J Yes r~No [ ~/es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? D es 171"o 15. Sl~eams within or contiguous to project area: INone a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary I 16, Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: None b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes N No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [] Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? -1No *Already connected NYes []No 16. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? r-]Yes r~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contigeous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 r']Yes X~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Desc~pt~ou 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). r']Yes ~No a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 0.424 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0. 424 acres initially;0.. 424 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 6 ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular tdps generated per hour: 75 h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will cccupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed r-lYes r"lNo a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? % (upon completion of project)? *Based on store size N/A Two Family Multiple Family Condominium width; length. ft. 0 tons/cubic yards, b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r"lYes [] No c. W upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other Iocally-impo~ant vegetation be removed by this project? r~Yes r~'l No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 1 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month __ year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes N No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? r"] Yes [-~ No 9. Number of]obs generated: during construction 10 ; after project is complete 3 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? r'-] Yes r~] No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes r~ No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? r~ Yes r~ No 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? NYes r~No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 1OO year flood plain? [] Yes r~ No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes r'-] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.25 tons b. If yes. w an existing solid waste facility be used? ['~ Yes [] No c. Ifyes, givename Town transfer station ; location Cutchogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? r-]Yes [] No Type Sanitarv- Alreadv I Page 6 of 21 e, If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? NYes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r'~Yes [] No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes [] No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ~ Yes ~ No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? N Yes r~ No If yes, indicate typo(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usa§e per day 3 6 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? r-'] Yes I-~ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25'. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board r-~ Yes r~ No City, Town, Village Planning Board [] Yes N No Site Plan Sanitarv svstem 239k review City, Town Zoning Board r"lYes F~ No City, County Health Department r'~ Yes r~ No Other Local Agencies r-]Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies F'lYes [] NO State Agencies J~JYes N No Federal Agencies r-'J Yes [] No Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? r'~Yes r~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan [] Site plan r'-] special use permit [] I~rce management plan r -] Subdivision r-]other Page 8. of 21 2. ' What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential deYelopm~nt of the site if developed as permitted by the present I40% lot coverage 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? IHB- No change 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?. J40% lot coverage 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y4 mile radius of proposed action? HB; RO; R-40; AC 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? F'~l Yes [] No Page 9 of 21 :1 C~. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No I 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? []Yes r~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [] No a, If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. DYes [] No D. Infmmafional Details ,, I Attach any ado%:ional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Ve~fieation I certify that the information provided above is ~ue to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/SponsorName William J. Lahti~ P.E. Date 10/28/08 Title Project Engi neer If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you am a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this Page 10 of 21 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE (:hair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRES~q~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (car. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: February 12.2009 Re: Checks The referenced application(s) has/have been accepted by the Planning Board and the check(s) may now be processed to revenue. Thank you. Project Name & Type Valero Site Plan Tax Map # Amount Check Date 102-5-26 $500 10/28/08 LR PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: October 31, 2008 Re: Payments Attached are the checks listed below. Payments are for deposit into a deferred account. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check Date/No. Type # Valero Site Plan app. 102-5-26 $500 10/28/08 ~6147 7-11 MattJtuck Site Plan app. 142-1-27 $572 ,9/29/08 #1020 Encs. LR EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS TO~x~' ~ EXISTING 36"W X B'-B' SOLID STEEL DODR ~ ~ BEARING GYP. BD PARTITION ~ J EXISTING ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGN OVER DOOR ~UTILITY RM i ~PROPOSED NON-LOA.D BEARING GYP. BD // /~f-- ?'"'"'" .............. ;; ~; OFFICE ~ / ::: .. _.~'"'-'--~./ PRIVACY LOCKSET AND CLOSER ~ II ~--~ HOLDFOR I'~ --'~/ ' \ ADA ' PROPOsEDKEYED LOCKSET AND DEADBOLTNoN_LOAD~ ~ EX,SI~ND NON-LOAD BEARING GYP. BD -- -- ~ ,~ - PARTlllON WALL TO REMAIN / ~ ........ -~---~=G"---'..-~== .... ~ (2) EXlSllNG ~6'W DOORS TO BE REMOVED / RESTROOM \, . PARTlllON WALL~ ::: , ~ / ....... ~ ...... ~-:~__~ ~____~ AND REJNSTAI I FO ~, \ ]((' ~ Il ~t ~EXISTIN(Z POINT F ENTRY :.: .I ~ li~ \ ,'-'. /~--Jq ~FOR ~ATEr SER CE TO ,: '~ RESTROOM % F'~ "~'~'~"~-+---~ ' ' -"" FORMER DOOR OPmNO NOW SEALED I ~ PROPOSED YIN 60 CFM EXHAUST FAN iN ~ ~ mu.o ~.TE~ ~o ou~s. EA. TO DE ~ r~ ~ MIRROR, · SOAP DISPENSER. INSULAIIE FORMER DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED ~ ~ - I : i /TEXIS N°TR^NsA° °"O°DNTER'°REMA'N I I L FUEL STO~E I STORERRO. T ~LAZ,NG TO RmA, N r FLOOR PLAN- PROPOSED E×,S.NG ~' N,G. KNEE WALL WAS PRE~O~S P~BS. TRE.O. EOOTINO B' X ~B' ~ VENEEREACA"E FLOOR PLAN-- DEMOLITION 1/4,' UTILITY R~ ' ~f~'=_=_=j,~///////////////,//// CEILING- PAINTED OYPSOM DOARD . n'-n" (EXOEPT um~ R. Is UNFINISBED) :' -- -- -- OFFICE \\k~ I i - 3 ~ ~ ::: I I .~ / / / / / / / ~ //~ / / / 1 m THE PROPOSED BUILDING MODIFICA]]ON IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. AS SUCH, mE ALTERATION ~ ~ !/.~ r.'.'.v.'.w.-.-.' ~ / 2. FORMER OCCUPANY WAS CLASSIFIED AS GROUP F-1 WITH HAZARD CATEGORY 4. X4'L~ 3. NEW OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED AS GROUP ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~' THERE IS NO CJ~ANGE IN S~UCTURAL DESIGN IMPORTANCE FACTORS* 5. ARTIFICIAL LIGHT AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE BUILDING. i APR -9 20]0 NT' ] ' ...... LAHTI ENGINEERING A ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. · HATCHED FLOOR AREA REPRESENTS CONVENIENCE STORE ~ 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 -~ RETAIL, STORAGE AND COUN~R AREA. ~~ ~ STONY BROOK, NY 11790 ' '~'''~'~.~ ~'~' N~ YORK P.E. UC~NSE NO. 0~77 800 SQUARE FEET PER LOCAL LAW NO. 14 OF 2009. , P.E. LICENSE NO. 37351 '~ CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 23322 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 0~1658 FLOOR PLAN- FIXTURES SCA~: 1/4" =1'-0" WILLIAM J. ~HTI MASSACHUS~S P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 MIST 1000 PR'OJECT: SITE: IT IS THE RESPONSIRILI~ OF ~E CONT~CTOR TO R~l~ A~ D~WINGS AND SPECI~CA~ONS ~SOClATED WITH THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INIT~TION OF SECT 102 CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION ~o.~,~,~,. ~,ou~ ~ ~.~o, ~,,~ * ~o~,~c, ~,~. *.[ ,o~u.[.,, VALERO SERVICE STATION RESTIVE TO THE SPECIRCATIONS. SIrE CONDITIONS OR ~PUC~ CODES, IT IS THE 3 R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS 3/3/10 RC WL BLK 5 ~UILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE CONT~CTOR'S RESPONSI~IU~ TO NOBF~ THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN LOT 26 28975 ROUTE 25 FAILURE ~ THE CONT~CTOR TO NOTI~ THE PROJECT ENGINEER S~ CONSTI]UT[ DWG~ R~ ~CE~CE OF ~ RESPONSlalLI~ BY THE CONT~CIOR TO COMPEL THE SCOPE ~ R~ISED PER TOWN P~NNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 ' RC WL JOB NO. DATE DRAWING CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 OF WORK AS DERNED BY THE DRAWINGS AND IN FULL COMP~CE WffH LOCAL 08--043 10/20/0~ STORE FLOOR PLAN A-1 3 REGU~TIONS AND CODES. ~TERATION OF THESE ~OCU~ENIS, UNLESS ~DE BY A DATE DRWN APPR NO. R~ISION DATE DRWN APPR UTILITY RM 'I' ~- HOLD FOR // \ADA / RESTROOM \ NON-LOAD BEARING GYP. BD PARTlllON WALL (3K'METAL STUD WITH ~"TYPE 'X' GYP. BD ON BOTH SIDES I~PICAL) OFFICE PRIVACY LOCKSET AND CLOSER -- PROPOSED 36'W X 6'-8" SOUO DOOR WITH KEYED LOCKSET AND DEADBOLT PROPOSED BEARING GYP. BD PARdi/ION WALL FOR FUEL ATTENDANT'S AREA STORE ATTENDANF'S AREA PROPOSED ADA COMPUANT TOILET & TANK WITH ADA GRABS BADS AND PAPER DISPESISER PROPOSED MIN. 60 CFM EXHAUST FAN IN CEIMNG ~ENIED TO OUTUOORS, FAN TO BE ENERGIZED WHENEN~R RES1ROOM UGHT SWITCH I$ TURNED ON. PROPOSED ADA COMPLIANT LAVATORy, MIRROR, ~ SOAP DISPENSER. INSULATE EXPOSED PIPES BENEATH LAVATORY PER ADA FLOOR PLAN- PROPOSED SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" DESK OFFICE EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS TO REMAIN EXISTING NON-LOAD BEARING GYP, BD PARTITION WALL TO REMAIN FORMER DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED -- WITH METAL STUD INSULATED WALL WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE FORMER DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED WITH MEI'AL STUD INSULATED WALL WITH CRICK VENEER FACADE STOREFRONT GLAZING TO BNG 56"W X 6'-8" SOUD STEEL DOOR UTILITY RM , · b 7'--9' I, /1~ WALL TO REMAIN RESTROOM _ // EXIS~NG NON-LOAD BEARING GYP. BD ~ PARllTION WALL TO BE REMOVED EXIStiNG NON-LOAD BEARING GYP. BO PARTITION WALL TO REMAIN __x/~ EXISTING TRANSACTION GOUNI~iR FO REMAIN FACE OF CONCRER2 BLOCK TO REMAIN ATTENDANT'S ATTENDANT'5 AREA AREA I IOVER~m EMERGENCYDooR TO REMAINLIGHT FIXTURES EXIS~NG 2' HIGH KNEE WALL WAS RAISED TO 42" AFF BY INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE BLOCK AND BRICK VENEER FACADE STOREFRONT GLAZING TO REMAIN~ / EXISllNG STOREFRONT AND 6'W X 7'-0"DOUBLE GLASS DOOR UNIT IN FORMERovERHEAD GARAGE DOOR OPENING FLOOR PLAN- DEMOLITION FORMER GARAGE DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED ~TH METAL STUD INSULATED WALL WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE. ACCORDING TO PRE~OUS PLANS. ~RENCN FOORNG 8" X 48" WAS INSTALLED BEFORE WALL FILLWAS INSTALLED. FINISHES: SCALE : 1/4" -1'-0" FLOOR- CERAMIC TILE WALLS- PAINTED GYPSUM BOARD/CMU BLOCK CEIUNG- PAINTED GYPSUM BOARD ~ 11'-11· (EXCEPT UTIUTY RM IS UNFINISHED) × / BUILDING NOTES- THE PROPOSEO BUILDING MODIFICATION IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. AS SUCH, ~-IE ALTERATION MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 8 OF THE "EXISTING BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE", 2007 VERSION (AS PER SECTION 506.2). 2. FORMER OCCUPANY WAS CLASSIFIED AS GROUP F-1 WITH HAZARD CATEGORY ~. 5. NEW OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED AS GROUP M WITH HAZARD CATEGORY 5. 4. THERE IS NO CHANGE IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN IMPORTANCE FACTORS. 5. ARTIFICIAL LIGHT AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE BUILDING. IT IS THE RESPONSIRILI~( OF THE CONIT~AOTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS AND NO. SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION, SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THE SPECIRCATIONS. SITE CONDITIONS OR APPLICABLF CODES, IT IS THE FUEL ~ ATTENDANT'S AREA SER~CE REVISION DATE FLOOR PLAN FIXTURES HATCHED FLOOR AREA REPRESENTS CONVENIENCE STORE RETAIL, STORAGE AND COUNTER AREA. PROPOSED AREA EQUALS 775 SQUARE FEE% CONVENIENCE STORE AREA IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 800 SQUARE FEET PER LOCAL LAW NO. 14 OF 2009. SCALE : 1/4" =1'-0" N 50. REV PER TOWN PLANNING BO WORK SESSION COMMENTS ~ REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENT.~ REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS DRWN APPR REVISION f,,!A[? - 5 2OD LAHTI WILLIAM d. LAHT~' (631) 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 751-6455 NEW YORK NEW JERSEY CONNECTICUT VIRGINIA NORTH CAROLINA MASSACHUSETTS CONSULTING, P.C. ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL' P.E. LICENSE NO. 068577 P.E. LICENSE NO. 57551 P.E. LICENSE NO. 23522 P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 P.E. LICENSE NO. 051095 P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 3/3/10 12/5/09 1/20/09 DATE DIST t000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. 08-043 PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWING lO/20/08 STORE FLOOR PLAN DWG# R~ Ail 3 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUIE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 + ~- EXISTING SHIN~G,L. ED MANSARD ROOF ~ ~[ -II IllTH II/F II II Fill IITT~ R: MAIECSNANTUCKETDGHT + · -- ~IM (COLOR: WILD1D ~ ~ BRICK VENEER (COLOR: SHERWIN ~IL!JAMS IVORY) STOREFRONT GLAZING TO REMAIN m Wl~ METAL S]UD INSULATED WALL Wi]~ m ~ /~lj //.~/ ///; BRICK VENEER FACADE. ACCORDING TO I ..f/'// /~/ /~ E~ // //~ PREVIOUS PLANS, ~RENCH FOOTING 8" X 48~ ~ ~ RICK VENEER (COLOR: SBERWlN WILLIAMS IVORY) EXISTING 2' HIGH KNEE WALL WAS --./f / RAISED TO 42" AFL BY INSTALLATION EXISTING STOREFRONT AND 6'W X OF CONCRETE BLOCK AND BRICK DOUBLE GLASS DOOR UNIT IN FORMER FORMER RESTROOM DOOR OPENINGS NOW VENEER FACADE (COLOR: SHERWIN OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR OPENING SEALED WITH METAL STUD INSULATED WALL WILLIAMS IVORY) WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE. FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH FACE) LEFT SIDE ELEVATION (WEST FACE) LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRON EN' AE ...... CONSULTING, i~i07 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (651) 751-6455 NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 068377 ~ NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE NO. 57351 \~.~~,~'~ ~1~ ~.~ CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO, 25522 ~ VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 031093 IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS AND WILLIAM d. LAHTI MASSACHUSETTS P.E. LICENSE NO, 46420 SPECIFICA~ONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF DIST 1000 PROJECT: SITE: CONSTRUCTION. SHOUED THE CONTRACTOR FINO A CONFUCT WITH tHE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, SlflE CONDITIONS OR APPLICABLE CODES, IT IS THE SECT 102 CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE PRO~ECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN 3 REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION COMMENTS .3/3/10 RC WL BLK 5 CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION WRITING, PRIOR TO TNE START OF CONSTRUCTION EOR RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUE. BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE VALERO SERVICE STATION FAILURE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE 2 REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENTE, 12/5/09 RC WL LOT 26 ACCEPTANCE OF FULL RESPONSIOiLDY BY THE CONTRACTOR TO DOMpLL=TE THE SCOPE 28975 ROUTE 25 OF WORK AS DEFINED DY THE DRAWINGS AND IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL 1 REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 , RC WL JOB NO. DATE DRAWING DWG# REV CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 REGULATIONS AND CODES. ALTERATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS, UNLESS MADE DY A UCENSED PROF., IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW. NO. REVISION DATE DRWN APPR NO. REVISION DATE DRWN APPR 08-045 10/20/08 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-2 3 ZONED / / ZONED KEY PLAN N.T.S. REVISION DATE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY PREPARED BY ROBERT MAVR~KAKIS. L.S. DA~:D AUGUST 2008 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STANDARD NOTES: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR (765-1560) AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF ANy WORK. WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT INSPECTION SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO THE ENGINEER'S ~TISFACTION Al' APPLICANT'S EXPENSE. 2. COORDINATE AND COMPLE[E ALL UTILIIY RELOCATIONS. DRWN APPR iO. REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENT.c 12/5/09 REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE LAND OWNER/APPLICANT: DRAWING SCHEDULE SP1- PROPOSED SITE PLAN LAHTI 8P2: DEMOLITION/£XISTING SITE pLAN SP3- PROPOSED GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN SP4- PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN SPS- EXISTING LIGHTING & SIGNAGE PLAbl SPO- SITE DETAILS SP7 TOWN CAR QUE/TRUCK PLAN DIST 1000 PROJECT: SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOBNO, DATE 08-043 10/20/08 ENGINEERING & RNVIXdiq'MENTAL ,~,~ WiLLiAM d." LAHT~' CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DRAWING PROP ALIGNMENT PLAN DWG# REV SP-1 2 CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (651) 751-6455 NEW YORK P.E. NEW JERSEY P.E. CONNECTICUT P.E. VIRGINIA P.E. NORTH CAROLINA P.E. MASSAOHUSbl ~S P.E. SITE: LICENSE NO. 068577 LICENSE NO. 37351 LICENSE NO. 23322 LICENSE NO. 041658 LICENSE NO. 031093 LICENSE NO. 46420 VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 'N..v// / / / ZONED "~0" CORN~ PROPOSED SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: 1" : 20'-0' IT IS THE RESPONSIDIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RENEW ALL DRAWINGS AND NO SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIA~ON OF CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THE SPECIFICADONS, SITE CONDIDONS OR APPUCADLE COPES, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILI~( TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN WRITING, PRIOR TO THE SIART OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUE REVISION DATE DRWN APPR iO. REV 12/5/09 PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENTS REVlSEB PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO, 08--043 LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (631) 751-6435 WILLIAM d. LAHTI NEW YORK P,E. LICENSE NO. 068377 NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE NO. 37351 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO, 23522 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 031095 MASSACHUSblIS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWING 10/20/0B SITE DEMOLITION PLAN DWG# REV SP-2 2 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 DRAINAGE POOL SCHEDULE DRAINAGE CALCULAIIONS (BASED ON 2" RAINFALL PER TOWN CODE) ZONE: 1: POOL PLP1 1,206 .'~ X 0.1e7' ,- 201 CU FT / (e8.58 CU FT/1 FT OF 10' DIA. POC~_) - 5' RING HGT 4,027 SF X 0.157' X 20'~ 155 CU Fr / (6~.3~ CU FT/I imF OF 10' DI~ POOl.) - 2' RING HGT · PROPO~ IO'R X 6 'CF RINGS 2,155 SC' X 0,167' = ,~0 CO FT / (68.36 CU FT/1 Fl' OF 10' D~A. POOL) = 5.3' RING HGT ZONED "HR" ~ ON. ~ClNO . ~ ROAD (, / ZONED / p/PC FD ZONED PROPOSED GRADE/DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE; 1" = 20'-0" LEGEND OOO.O0 EXISTING GRAOE ~ PROPOSED GRADE TC TOP OF CURB BC BOD'OM Of CURD -- RIDGE LINE ND MDDIFIEATIDNS DF THE EXISTING GRADING DR STORMWAI'ER DRAINAGE SYSTEM ARE PRDPDSED SITE REVISION DATE DRWN APPR !0. REV 12/5/09 PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENTS REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE RC WL DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 RC WL I JOB NO. DRWN APPR 08-045 WILLIAM d. LAH~i~"'~~" LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRO'NigiENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (631) 751--6455 NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 068577 NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE NO. 37351 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 23322 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO, 04165B NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 051095 MASSACHUSL~ ~S P.E. LICENSE NO. 4-6420 PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWING lO/2o/o8 S TE GRADE PLAN DWG# REV SP-3 2 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 ZONED ~H£ ~ · ~,~."~'~,~,~.~ ii ZONED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~7 --0 / / / ZONED "RO" / MAIN ROAD · IS THE RESPONSIBIUT~ OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVlEW AU DRAWINGS AND NO. ;PECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ~IS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF :ONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THE CON[RACTDR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS ~ELATIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, SEE CONDITIONS OR APPUCABLE CODES, IT IS THE :ON]RACTOR'S RESPONSIBILI~¢ TO NOTIFY THE PROJECI' ENGINEER DF RECORD IN INITING, PRIOR TO IHE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOEUIlON OF ~¢IE ISSUE. ALLURE BY THE CONTRACIOR TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SRAU CONSTITUTE ,CCEPTANCE OE FUU RESPONSIBIUT¢ DY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPILE THE SCOPE ~F WORK AS DEFINED BY TRE DRAWINGS AND IN FULL COMPLL&NCE WiTH LOCAL EGULA[IONS AND CODES. ALIERAIlON OF [NESE GOCUMENIS, UNLESS MADE BY A ICENSED PROF.. IS A VIOLATION OF SECTOR 7209 OF THE STATE EDUCATOR LAW. REVISION DATE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" DRWN APPR iO. REV t2/5/o9 PER TOWN PLANNING 8D WORK SESSION ~ NYSDOT COMMENTS REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIR(~'NMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (651) 751-6433 WILLIAM d. LAHTI NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO, 068377 NEW JERSEY P.E, LICENSE NO. 37551 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO, 23322 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P,E. LICENSE NO. 031093 MASSACHUSETTS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 DIST 1000 PROJECT: SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. 08-045 CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWING DWG# REV 10/20/08 LANDSCAPE PLAN SP-4 2 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 119~5 ZONED ~x S JO'20 4~ W ] ~ ....... "" "l~l~O '- ' ' . . , .. ,... .. ~ - ~ -.~, . , , . . . , t" t-t' '.- t'" "~'~- , .': tt' " '-. ]- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' u. - ': ~ ' '~ ~s 8~ ~ : ''' . . o ~sr ~ ~ ' ' ' ~ ZONED '~-40" ~ EXISTING/PROPOSED SIGN & LIGHT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" BACKGROUND COLOR ON CANOPY FASCIA --YELLOW STRIPE ALONG BO]TOM OF CANOPY FASCIA CANOPY SIGN GROUP #2 (ON--EAST FACE OF CANOPY): "VALERO" WORDMARK - WHITE ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS; 1'-9" HIGH X 10'-5 15/16" - 18.1 SF YELLOW GESTURE - YELLOW ILLUMINATED CHANNEL; 1'-9" HIGH X 11'-9 1/2" LONG = 20.6 SF VALERO LOGO - 2'-3" HIGH X 2'-10 5/8" = 6.4 SF IT IS THE RESPONSIBIUI¥ OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIL%V ALL DRAWINGS AND NO, SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WllH THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO TNE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO TNE SPECIFICATIONS, SITE CONDITIONS OR APPUCABL~ CODES. ~T IS THE CONTR~,CTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN WRITING, PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUE, FAILURE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF FULl RESPONSIBILITY BY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE THF SCOPE OF WORK AS DEFINED BY THE DRAWINGS AND IN TULL COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, ALTERATION OF rHESE DOCUMENTS, UNLESS MADE BY A LICENSED PROF, IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF rilE STATE EDUCAIION LAW. REVISION DATE PROPOSED SIGN #1 FREESTANDING GROUND SIGN: 41.5 SF (ROUGH DIMENSIONS 5' X 8') ~WN APPR i 1lO'I-REV 12/5/09 PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENTS REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE UGHTING' AREA LIGHTS- "LSI CHALLENGER" FIXTURE WITH 400W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHT SOURCE, ~(PE III FORWARD THROW, WITH CONTOURED BOROSILLICATE GLASS LENS, MOUNTED ON A 15 FT HIGH POLE CANOPY RECESSED DOWN LIGHTS- "LSI CROSSOVER", ENERGY EFFICIENt LED LIGHT SOURCE, (4) FIXTURES WITR 50 LEDS AND (4) FIXTURES WITH 100 LEDS LIGHTING MANUALLY CONTROLLED VIA A PHOTOCELL. THE SITE IS OPEN 24 HOURS PER DAY. THERE IS A MANUAL OVERRIDE SWITCH IN CASE THE PHOTOCELL FAILS. LAHTI ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 · (631) WILLIAM J. LAHTI E NVI: .O'K ENTAL 751-6433 NEW YORK P.E. NEW JERSEY P.E. CONNECTICUT P.E. VIRGINIA P.E. NORTH CAROLINA P.E. MASSACHUSblIS P.E. LICENSE NO. 068577 LICENSE NO. 37551 LICENSE NO. 25522 LICENSE NO. 041658 LICENSE NO. 031095 LICENSE NO. 46420 DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. 08-045 PROJECT: DATE 10/20/08 CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DRAWING DWG# REV LIGHTING & SIGN PLAN SP-5 2 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 SHRUB BED TOPSOIL SHRUBS (2)- 3/¢ " REINFORCED RUBBER HODE DOUBLE STRAND #12t WIRE (~NISTED) CEDAR STAKE 5" MULCH LOOSEN AROUND' TOPSOIL MIX 25~ PEAT MOSS DAGWOODS AND ~VERGREENS ONLY) MINOR TREES DOUBLE STRAND ~12I WIRE (DA/ISTED) (2)- 3/4" REINFORCED RUBBER HO! B' LONG CEDAR STAKE 2" TO 5" MIN CALIITER I (VARIES) §" ABOVE DROUND MULCH ~ 6" LAYER OF TOPSOIL LOOSEN BURLAP AROUND TRUNK I- TOPSOIL (25~ MANURE) MAJOR STREET TREES PLANTING DETAILS SCALE .................. N.T.S. 'NO PARKING ANYTIME" SIGN SIGN WIDE BLUE PAINTED STRIPES, TYPICAL THROUGHOUT 4" WIDE BLUE PAINTED STRIPES ON 45' ANGLE, 24" O.C. TYPICAL PARKING / 8'--0" HANDICAPPEID STALL DETAIL N.T.S. REVISION DATE CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE BOLLARD STEEL SIGN POST 12" x 12" x CONC. FTG. SIGN DETAIL (1) PER NEW GENERAL NOTES CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE BOLLARD STEEL SIGN POST 12" x 12" x 12 CONG. ETD. NO PARKING ANYTIME El SION DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. H/C STALL (1) PER NEW H/C STRIPED 1. EXISTING SITE PLAN INFORMATION BASED ON SURVEY. STALL 2. PROPOSED GRADES SHOWN HEREON ARE BARED ON EXISTING GRADES AS SHOWN ON SURVEY. B. FACILITY MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT MUST PERIODICALLY INSPECT AND CLEANOUT STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO MINIMIZE POSSIBLE FLOODING DUE TO CLOGGED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ALL PVC PIPING TO BE MINIMUM SDR 35 MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-3034 AND ASTM F-679 (APPUCABLE STANDARD BASED ON PIPE DIAMETER), 5, ALL PIPING TO BE BEDDED AND BACKFILLED USING MINIMUM TOPE 3 CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM D-2321, COMPACTION TO BE MINIMUM 95~ MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY, B. CON.ACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE POE ENSURING THAT UNDERGROUND PIPING. STRUCHJRES, ETC. ARE NOT DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES INCLUDING, ASPHALT PAVEMENT/GRASS- SEE SITE PLAN HEAVY DU~¢ CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME & LID- REFER TO SCHEDULE (CAMPBELL FOUNDRY OR APPR EQUAL) [ ~ ~ PRECAST REINFORCED \ GRADE ,,. CONCRETE CO~L~R DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 RC LOT 26 RC JOB NO. 08-043 Go 10' DIAMETER / GROUNDWA LEACHING REV PER TOWN PLANNING BD WORK SESSION & NYSDOT COMMENTS t2/5/09 REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE STORM WATER SCALE PROJECT: CONVERSION BUILDING TO 1 1/2" WEARING COURSE-ITEM 51F 3 1/2' DENSE BINDER COURSE 6" BASE COURSE, GRAVEL, [ BRUSHED STONE-ITEM 201 3'--0" MIN. POOL N.T.S. CONTINUOUS #4 (TYP FOR 2) SUBBRADE COMPACTED TO MIN. 95~ STD. PROCTOR DENSllY SECT. PARKING FLD. IMPROVEMENTS SCALE ................................................ N,T.S. PAVEMENT/CURB NOTES, 1. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH DF 4,000 PSI AT 2B BAYS WITH A MAXIMUM OF G% AIR ENTRAINMENT. 2, EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL DE PLADED IN THE CURD AT A MAXIMUM OF 16 FOOT INTERVALS, 3, ASPHALT PAVEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 400 'BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS' DF THE 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS' MANUAL AS PUBLISHED DY THE OFFICE DF ENGINEERING OF THE NEV YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAIDN, THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE, OUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, USE OF A 10 TON STEEL WHEEL ROLLER FOR PROOF ROLLING AND COMPACTION, PROOF ROLLING DF THE SUBGRADE UNDER THE PROPOSED PAVED AREA, SMOOTH ROLLING OF THE PAVEMENT AT A MAXIMUM DF 4 MILES PER HOUR, AND PLACEMENT DF PAVEMENT ONLY WHEN SURFADE TEMPERATURES EXCEED 4S DEGREES FAHRENHEIT, 4, PAVEMENT SHALL NOT BE PLACED WHEN TNE SUDGRADE OR BASE MATERIAL IS WET OR FROZEN, ALL DEFICIENT AREAS IDENTIFIED BY PROOF ROLLING DR OTHER MEANS SHALL BE REMEDIED TO PROVIDE A FIRM, SUITABLE BASE AND RE ROLLED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT IT HAg BEEN SATISFACTORILY REPAIRED, LAHTI ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, P.C. ~ 207 HALLOCK ROAD. SUITE 212 WILLIAM d. LAHTI OF SERVICE STATION CONVENIENCE STORE DWG# REV SP-6 2 DATE DRAWING 10/2O/0B SITE DETAILS SITE: STONY BROOK, NY 11790 D,'~ .... -' (631) 751-6435 \ ~"'~-'] - C~O]~->'.. NEW YORK P,E. ,,LI 06J~577 NEW dERSEY P.E. b],CEN,SE,~'N~."-57551,.~ CONNECTICUT P.E. EllESSE NO. 25522 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 051095 MASSACHUSETFS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 i (ROAI) WORK AHEAD) I ' j ~ I (ONE LANE ROAD AHEAD) 1 1 I C) G=~ENERAL NOTES, o II 1, ALL TRAFFIC CDNTRDL DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES OJJJ MUST CDNFDRM WITH THE NATIONAL MUTCI] WITH ~ N,Y,S,D,B,T, 36'xOG' SION W20-7~ NE~ YORK STATE SUPPLEMENT, TRAFFIC BEFDRE ~ 4, WHEN PLACING OR RETRIEVING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, CONTRACTOR IS TD UTILIZE THE TRAFFIC ~ k CDNI'RDL SCHEME FDR SLOWLY MOVING WORK AREAS, 5. VHEN LANE CLOSURE IS REQUIRED~ THE CDNTRACTDR ~ SHALL UTILIZE THE TRAFFIC CONTROL SCNEHE FOR ~ ~ PER~IT INSPECTOR. / / II LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIROnmeNT <~"~"'~"~ II i TOWN REQUIRED V:HICLE qUE ~ TRUCK PLAN ~ 207 HALLOC~ MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC P~N ['"'"'"l '"'"'"'i i '1~o~n,~/~~~~ °~'a~ ~ CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 25322 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 031093 WILLIAM J. ~HTI MASSACHUS~IIS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46~20 IT IS ~E RESPONSlBILIW OF THE CONT~ACTO~ TO R~EW ALL D~AWINGS AND DIST 1000 PROJECT: SITE: SPECIFICATIONS ASSOClA~D WITH THIS PROaECT PRIOR TO THE INmA~oN OF SECT 102 CONmUCT~ON. SHOULO T.~ COm~CTOR F~Ng A tO.taCT W~ZH T.~ DOCU~N~ CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION CONTrACTOr'S ~S~ONS~U~ TO NOT~ T"~ ~O~CT ~Na~N~ Or ~a~g ~N BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE WRITING, PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF ~E ISDUE. 2 R~ PER TOWN P~NNING BD WORK SESSION ~ NYSDOT COMMENTS 12/5/09 RC WL LOT 26 28975 ROUTE 25 E~LURE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTI~ TOE PR~ECT ENGINEE~ SHA~ CON~ITUTE ACOEPT~CE OF FU~ RESPONSIBIU~ BY THE CONT~CTOR TO CO~P~E THE SCOPE 1 R~ISED PER TOWN P~NNINg COMMENTS 1/20/09 RC WL JOB NO, DATE DRAWING DWG~ R~ CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 ~E~UaTIO~S ~ CODES. A~raA~ON Or THESE aOCU~NTS, UNLmS ~E ~ A Oa--043 10/20/08 VEHICLE QUE P~N SP-7 2 UCENSED PROF., IS A VIO~TION OF SECTION 7209 OF ~E 5TA~ EDU~ON ~W. NO. R~ISION DATE DRWN APPR NO. REVISION DATE DRWN APPR ZONED "HB" pROPERTY ro RE~,ll^' ~V/F OF DA ~?D ' ~_~;~ £ ZONED "H/~'~, .~,'b'~' O ,~L // // / / / KEY PLAN N.T.S. PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' 0" SITE PLAN DASED ON SURVEY PREPARED BY ROBERT MAVRIKAKIS, L.S, DATED AUGUST 200S LAND OWNER/APPLICANT. SOS REAL~ DORP, L .... IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS AND 'j jl-~ SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT PRIOR ]'0 TI-IE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS NELATIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, Sire CONDITIONS OR APPLICADLE CODES, If iS THE CONTRACTOR'S BESPONSIBILI~P¢ TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENDINEER OF RECORD IN WRITING, PRIOR TO THE STAR1 OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF THE iSSUE. FAILURE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF FUL RESPONSIBILITY DY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE THE SCOPE OP WORK AS DEFINED DY TBS DRAWINGS AND IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES. ALTERATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS, UNLESS MADE BY A LICENSED PROF, IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF D-IE STATE EDUCATION LAW REVISION DATE 1OWN OF SOUFIIOLD STANDARD NOTES: 2 COORDINATE AND COMPLETE ALL UTILITY RELOCATIONS. DRAWING SCHEDULE SP1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SP2- DEMOLITION/EXISTING SITE PLAN SP3- PROPOSED GRADiNG/DRAINAGE PLAN SP4- PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN SPS- EXISTING LIGNTING & SIDNAGE PLAN SP6- SITE DETAILS REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS REVISION i I D]ST 1000 PROJECT: ' BLK 5 '] ----i LOT 26 RC i WL JOB NO. DATE j. DRWN ~ APPR 08-043 10/20/08 1/20/;' DAT'- LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 (631) 751 64-53 WILLIAM J. LAFI1 ;ONVERSION OF SERVICE SIATION 3UILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DWO~ SP-1 1 SITE: .AWING PROP ALIGNMENT PLAN NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 068377 NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE NO, 37351 CONNECTICUT P.E, LICENSE NO. 23322 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E, LICENSE NO. 051095 MASSACHUSETTS P,E. LICENSE NO. ,¢6420 VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 1~935 $30' W ' // LAND N/,~ 0~' DAV/D AZ ~ AZ¥~. /~ ? / / / / ZONED "R- 40" ~ / / / ZONED PROPOSED SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" REVISION DATE REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS REVISION 1/20/09 DATE W,L DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 RC JOB NO. DRWN APPR 08-043 PROJECT: LAHTI CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 ONY BROOK, NY 11790 (631) 751-6435 NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE WILLIAM J. LAFIT MASSACHUSETTS P.E. LICENSE CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DEMOLITION PLAN DWO# REV SP-2 1 DATE DRAWING ~o/20/o8 S TE ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL NO. 068377 NO. 37351 NO. 23322 NO. 041658 NO. 031093 NO. 46420 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 DRAINAGE POOL SCHEDULE DRAINAGE CALCULAI~ONS (BASED ON 2" RAINFALL PER TOWN CODE) v UNE ZONED ~H~" ~ ,mo. mm* 32 lB . Y-' ZONED "~-40" ",~g'~ Y" -,,,C\ \ \\\\ PROPOSED GRADE/DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' 0" IT IS THE RESPONSIBILIP( OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS AND NO. SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THiS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION SNOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. SI~ CONDITIONS OR APPLICABLE CODES. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIP'( THE PROJECT ENGINEER DF RECORD IN WRITING, PRIOR 10 THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUIlON OF THE ISSUE, LEGEND OOO,O0 EXISTING GRADE ]O00,O~ PROPOSED GRADE TC TOP OE CURB BC ROll"OM OF CURB -- RIDGE LINE ~ PtTCH REVISION DATE ND MBDIFICATIDNS OF THE EXISTING GRADING DR SITE STDRM~ATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM ARE PRDPBSED DRWN APPR --~0. REVISED PER TOWN PLANNINC COMMENTS 1/20/09 REVISION DATE DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. 08-043 LAHTI WILLIAM J. LAHTI ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, P.C. ,~207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 STONY BROOK, NY 11790 · (631) 751-6433 I"t NEW YORK P,E. '/ NEW JERSEY P.E. CONNECTICUT P.E. VIRGINIA P.E. NORTH CAROLINA P.E. MASSACHUS~ IS P.E. E ,VCR NMENTAL LICENSE NO. 068377 LICENSE NO. 37351 LICENSE NO. 23322 LICENSE NO. 041658 LICENSE NO, 031095 LICENSE NO. 46420 PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE DRAWlNOsiTE ~o/2o/o8 GRADE PLAN DWG# REV SP-3 1 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY ~1955 / / / / ZONED "170" ZONED '~-~0" ~ ~ IT IS THE RESPONSIBIU]Y OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIL~V ALL DRAWINGS AND NO. SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. SiTE CONDITIONS QR APPLICABLE CODES, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR*S RESPONSIBILI~( TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN WRIHNG, PRIOR TO 1HE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF ~IE ISSUE. FAILURE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF FULL RESPONSIBILITY DY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLEfE THE SCOPE OF WORK AB DEFINED BY THE DRAWINGS AND IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, ALTERATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS, UNLESS MADE OY A LICENSED PROF., IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW. REVISION DATE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE. 1" = 20'-0" DRWN APPR O. REVISED PER TOWN PLANNING COMMENTS REVISION · DIST 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 N A R 08-043 LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS: SITE AREA = 18,473 SF (0424 ACRES) EXISTING LANDSCAPING - 511 SF (1.7~) TOTAL PROPOSED LANDSCAPING - 4,690 SF (25 4~) PROPOSED LANDSCAPING EXCLUDING REO'D 15' BUFFER = 2,102 SF (11.4%) ENVIRONMENTAL LAHTI 207 I-IALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 ,.?~/w~TqNY BROOK, NY 11790 ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, WILLIAM d. LAH' PROJECT: CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DATE I ORAWlNG '~ o/2o/o8 I LANDSCAPE PLAN DWG# REV SP-4 1 P,E. LICENSE NO. 068377 P.E. LICENSE NO. 57551 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 23322 VIRGINIA P.E, LICENSE NO, 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 031093 MASSACHUSLIIS P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ZONED ~HB' - i ~ ZONED '~- 40" EXISTING/PROPOSED SION & LIGHT PLAN AR~ U~NrS "LS~ CHallENgE." F~XrU~[ W~rH 4OOW H~OH P.[SSU.[ SOO~U~ UOHT CANOPY REOESSED DOWN LIGHTS- "LSI CROSSOVER". ENERGY EFFIOIENT LED LIGHT [ [ ~ ] I LIgHTIN~ MANUALLY OONTROLLED VIA A PHOTOO[LL. THE SITE IS OPEN 24 HOURS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ PER OAY. THERE IS A MANUAL OVERRIDE SW~TOH ~N CASE THE PHOTOgELL FA~LS. ~:.~ j ~, i , "~ ~k,' ts' ' , ~~R~ C~ ~ C~O~ FASCIA ~ · .... co o, o, LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL YELLOW STRIPE ALONG BOSOM OF CANOPY FASCIA ~~]I"[E~g ~ '~.,'~1~'~~ 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 CANOPY SIGN GROUP ~4 (ON ~ST FACE OF CANOPY): I , ,,, ,,~l,,,~,,,,, ,,, (631) 751-6455 ~ NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. 068377 '~ALERO" WORDMARK WHITE ILLUMINATED CHANNEL L~ERSi 1'-9" HIgH X 10'-3 1fi/ltl" = 18.1 SF ~YELLOW STRIPE ALONg BOSOM OF OANOPY FASCIA °1~ - ' YELLOW OES~URE - YELLOW ILLUMINAITD CHANNEL; 1'-~" HIgH X 11'-} 1/2" LON~ = 20.6 SF PROPOSED SIgN #1 FREESTANDINg GROUND SIGN:~~/~ °~'8~1 " GONNEOTIcuTNEW dERS~ P.E.p.E. LICENsELICENSE No.NO' 2332237381 OANOPY SIGN ~2 AND #3 (ONE ~gH ON NORTH AND SOUTH FACES OF CANOPY): ~0~ VIRGINIA P.E. LIOENSE NO. 041888 VALERO LOgO - 2'-3" HIgH X 2'-10 ~yS" = ~.4 SF 4~.3 SF (ROUGH DIMENSIONS fi' X 8') VALERO LOgO - 2'-3" HIGH X 2'-103/8" = 6.4 SF NORTH OAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 0~1093 WILLIAM d. ~HTI MASSAOHUSE~S P.E. LIOgNS[ NO. 46420 IT IS IHE RESPONSIBILI~ OF THE CONTaC[OR TO R~I~ ALL D~AWlNgS AND DIST t000 PROdgOT: SITE: SPECIFIO~TIONS ASSOQIAIED WITH THIS PR~EQT PRIOR TO THE INI~A~ON OF CONSTRUCTION. SHOULB THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS SECT 102 RENTIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, SITE CONDITIONS OR APPUC~LE CODES, IT ms TkIE --- CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION w.m.e. ¢.~o. TO THE s~*.r or co.smucr~o, rD..[SOZOT~O, or mE ~ssu~ BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE FAILURE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTI~ THE PR~ECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE LOT 26 REGU~TIoNsOF WORN AS ANDDEFINEDcODEsBY THEALTE~TioNDRAWINGSoF ANDTHEsEIN DOCUMENTS,~ OOMP~NCEuNLEssWITHMADELO~LBy A 1 R~ISED PER TOWN P~NNING COMMENTS 1/20/0g RC WL JOB NO DATE 'DRAWING DWG~ R~ OUTOHOOU E, NY 1 1 9~ LICENSED PROF., IS A VIO~TION OF SEC~ON 7209 OF ~HE STATE EDUCATION ~W. NO. R~ISION DATE DRWN APPR ~ NO. REVISION DATE ~ DRWN APPR 08-045 10/20/08 L]O~T]NO HANDICAPPED I ASPHALT PAVEMENT/GRASS- SEE SITE PLAN ~--] ~ PARKING HEAVY DU]~' CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME & LID- REFER ~ ~ TO SCHEDULE (CAMPBELL FOUNDRY OR APPR EQUAL) PERMIT NO ~"NOPARKING "HANDICAPPED REQUIRED PRECAST REINFORCED SHRUB BED , , ~ ANYTIME "'- ~ " x PRECAST REINFORCED ---~" WIDE BLUE PAINTED I J I I STRIPES, TYPICAL CONCRETE FILLED~ [ I CONCRETE FILLED I [ REINFORCED CONCR~E ~ ID ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WRAP RINGS WITH TOPSOil THROUGHOUT STEEL PIPE BOLLARD ~ I STEEL PIPE BOLLARD I I L~CHING POOL il o STEEL SION POST Il o '~4 I~ ~ ~ ~;;" Il ' I m BANKRUN ~ I~ ~ I ~ ~ U ~f ~ -' (2)- 3/4" REINFORCED RUBBER x ~ x ~ o F '. DOUBLE STRAND ~12 x x 12' 12" x 12" x 12" ~ ': M LCH -- ~-- '/ ~ II II ' ' AROUNDTRUNK - 'LOOSEN = SIGN DETAIL SIGN DETAfL d (DAGWOODSAND ~' '~' ~U (1) PER NEW H/C STALL (1) PER NEW H/C STRIPED STALL ERGREENSONLY) '- "'' '1. , TYPICAL HANDICAPPED STORM WATER LEACHINC POOL (2) 3/4 REINFORCED RUBBER HO~[cONTiNUOUS ~4 REBAR~ .', t ~'~- %"2.% * ': - - '~/ ~ ' 12. ALL IMPROVEMENTS S~L BE CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ~UFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND LOCAL REGU~TORY ~ REQUIREMENTS. SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO MIN. / LOOSEN BUR~P ~m' ' ' , m m~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ I m r m F 2~. STANDARDs.ALL N~ PIPING IS TO BE ~ TESTED SY mE CONTraCTOR PR)OR TO BACKFIRING, tN ACCORDANCE WITH ~TM RECOMMENDED PraCTICES mB LOCA 3, 400ASPHALT'BITUMINBusPAVEMENTpAvEMENTs'gHALL BE DFPRDVIDEDTHE 'STANDARDAND INSTALLEDsPECIFICATiBNs.IN ACCflRDANCEMANUAL~ITHA8 PUBLISHED,SECTIBN ~ ) m , ' ' -~ .' . ) m~ OR OTHER APPROPRIATE U~NS. ~L DAUAGE SHA~ BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTORS SOLE COST TO ~E SATISFACTION OF THE PR~ECT ARCHITECT. THESE REQUIREMENTg SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NUT BE LIMITED TO, USE DF A 10 TUN STEEL MAJOR STREET TREES LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. ~, _ 207 HALLO¢~K~ 212 SCALE ................. N T.S. ....... ~ p.E.~~ ~ ~J '~[ ~- ~Eb LICENsELICENSE No.NO' 06837737351 ~SS~O~ ' , ,,' uu ~b/~nuUt P E ~ ' ,~, .. LICENSE NO. 23322 ~ ~-- ' VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 k '" NO~LINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 031093 WILLIAM d. ~HTI ~-- ' MAS~ACHDS~S P E LICENSE NO. 46420 .~nv[ ~o mE sPm~,c*~o~s, sH~ coNomous o~ ~puc*.~ cools. ~ ~s mE SECT CONmAOTOR'S RESPONSIBIUW TO NOTI~ THE PRmECT ENGINEER OF REOORD IN BLK 5 CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION ~m~. ~.,o. m m~ s~*.* ~ co~smuc~,o~ ro~ .~so.u*m o~ ~ ,ssu~. BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE VALerO ~VlC~ ~TAT[ON OF WORK AS DEFIND BY TH~ D~WINGS AND IN FULL COMPHANO[ ~ITII LOCAL I REVISED PER TOWN P~NNING COMMENTS 1/20/09 RC WL dOB NO. DATE ~DRAWlNG DWG~ R~ L~gENSED PROF,, IS A VIO~TION OF SECTION 72~9 OF THE STATE EDUCATION ~W. NO. R~ISION DATE DRWN APPR NO. R~ISION DATE DRWN APPR OB-D43 10/20/08 ~ SITE DETAILS SP-6 ./ I ZONED . ' I I [ · ~ ..... ~ · ~ -':':.'~ ........ q ~ ' . -: II J 'RO"' ~-~ o . · : .. - .: .::-. :- - -..-.-... -..~~:~-.~-: '- '..'. -'.::::'." ..: '.-'.::-:::::::-:'.'."~a~,oo::~:::'.~ ~-:'...:"...:'.'.'.-.::- '--.-' ...-.::..'.- .'.. --.::-.:: ..~-..... -.............. . ~ ~ ~ " ' ' ' ' " ": ':: ' ": ''" '" ?:~?~'"";~':'"' ' ' ' "'5'" ' ': :: :' '"'~:'": ':: "'" o '-~/ " ~ ....... ' .... ' ' "'"' .... " '"' "'"'"':'":'":'""' ' ~ ZONED '~-40" ~ ~ EXISTING/PROPOSED SIGN ~ LIOHT PLAN ~ u~ms- "m~ OH~[~" F~XT~[ W~TH ~OOW ~H P~[SSU~[ SO~U~ U~H~ ..... ,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,, JAN 29 2009 FASCIA LAHTI ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL ~YELLOWSTRIPEALONgBO~O~OrOANOPYFASClA ~~~~ CONSULTING,207 HALLOOK ROAD, SUITE~'C'212 ~~;:~,.,¢ ~;) STONY BROOK, NY 11790 CANOPY SIGN GROUP ~ (ON ~ST PACE OF CANOPY): · (651) 751-6455 VALERO LOgO - 2'-5" HIGH X 2'-10 5/8" = 6.4 SF NORTH CAROLINA P.E. LICENSE NO. 051095 IT IS THE RESPONSlBlU~ OF ~E aOITBCTOR TO RBIB ALL D~WIN~S AND WILLIAM J. ~HTI MASSACHUS~S P.E. LICENSE NO. 48420 O0~OTOR'S R~PONSIBILI~ TO NO~ THE PROCEOT ENGINEER OF .ECORD IN BLK 5 CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION w.m.¢, ..~OR TO ~ ~T O~ CON~RUO~ON ~0. R~SOL~O. Or ~ ~SSU~. BUlLDINO TO CONVENIENCE STORE VA~O ~OEPTANOE OF ~ "~PONSIBID~ BY THE OONT~CTO" TO OOMP~ THE SOOPE 28975 ROUTE 25 OF WORK AS BERNEB BY ~E D~WINGS ~D IN FU~ OO~PLI~OE W~ LO~L 1 R~ISED PER TOWN P~NNINO COMMENTS 1/20/09 RC WL JOB NO. DATE DRAWING BWg~ R~ CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 LIOENSEB PROF., IS A VIO~ON OF SEC~ON 7209 OF ~E ~ATE EBU~TION ~W. NO. R~ISlON DATE DRWN APPR NO. R~ISION BATE DRWN APPR 08-045 10/20/08 LIGHTING ~ SIGN P~N SP-5 1 N " d I I I / j> I' ~$' 0 ] 5TORY MA50H~Y t~LO~. / / / / / // // // & // 517U/7~0 A 7 CUTCHOGU£ 70W~/ OF 6OUTHOLD SUFFOLK OCT 3 1 ' ~: $.C. EM. DISE 1000 5£C. UTILITY RM ~- ~HOLD FOR // \ADA i/RESTROOM \1 ATTENDANT'S AREA NON-LOAD BEARING GYP. BD PARTITION WALL (3~"METAL STHB ~"TYPE 'X' GYP. BD ON BOTH BIDES TYPICAL) 36"W X 6'-8' DOOR PRIVACY LOCKSET AND CLOSER -- PROPOSED 36"W X B'-8' SOLID DOOR NTH KEYED LOCKSET AND DEADBOLT PROPOSED NON-LOAD BEARING GYP. BD PAR~TION WALL EXiSTiNG POINT OF ENTRY FOR WATER SERVICE TO REMAIN PROPOSED ADA COMPIIANT TOI[ ET & TANK DISPENSER PROPOSED MIN. 60 CFM EXHAUST FAN IN CEILING VENTED TO OU1DOORS. FAN TO BE ENERGIZED WHENEVER RES]ROOM LIGHT SW~TCH IS TIJRNEB ON. PROPOSED ADA COMPLIANT LAVATORY, MIRROR. & SOAP DISPENSER. INSULATE EXPOSED PIPES BENEATH LAVATORY PER ADA FLOOR PLAN- PROPOSED BCALE . 1/4" =1'-0" UTILITY RM if RESTROOM \1 2'DX4'LX6'H SHELF 2'DX4'LXG'H SHELF ATTENDANT'S AREA 27"W TRANSACRON COUNTER I I EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS TO REMAIN EXISTING NON-LOAD SEARING GYP. BD PARTErlON WALL TO REMAIN FORMER DOOR OPENING NOW BEALED WITH METAL BTUD INSULATED WALL WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE FORMER DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED WITH METAL STUD INSULATED WALL WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE EXISTING NON-LOAD REARING GYP. BD PARTITION WALL TO REMAIN UTILITY RM 36"W X 6'--8" SOLID STEEL DOOR ILLUMiNA~bD EXIT SION OVER DOOR TO REMAIN EXISTING PAINTED CMU 7'-9" I WALL TO REMAIN ~___42=~___ '~(2) EXISTING 56 W DOORS TO BE REMOVED RESTROOM lNG PAINTED GYP. BD WALL ON INbLDE FACE OF CONCRETE BLOCK TO REMAIN ATTENDANT'S AREA STOREFRONT GLAZING TO STOREFRONT GLAZING T! REMAIN EXISTING 2' HIGH KNEE WALL WAS RAIBED TO 42" AFF BY INSTALLATION 2% OF CONCRETE BLOCK AND BRICK · VENEER FACADE ;~///////////////////. ~77/~ IT IS THE RESPONSIBILII~ OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS AND NO, SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO FHE INITIAtiON OF CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THE CONTBACTOR FiND A CONFLICT WITH THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO ]HE SPECIFICATIONS, SITE CONDITIONS OB APPLICABLE CODES, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIF¢ THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN WRITING, PRIOR TO TI-IE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF TNE ISSUE, FAILURE BY TRE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIF~¢ THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF FULl_ RESPONSIBILITY BY THE CON1T~ACTOR TO COMPLETE TFIE SCOPE OF WORN AS DEFINED BY THE DRAWINGS AND IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES ALTERATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS, UNLESS MADE BY A UCENSED PBOF,, IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF TNE STATE EDUCA~ON LAW. REVISION DATE DOUBLE SIDED GONDOLA UNIT DOUBLE SIDED OONDOLA COFFEE BAR DIRT 1000 SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. 08-045 FLOOR PLAN FIXTURES WALK - IN COOLER WALK IN FREEZER REVISION -- EXIS~ING NON-LOAD BEARING GYP. BD PARTITION WALL TO BE REMOVED EXIBTING NON-LOAD BEARING GYP, BD PARTITION WALL 10 REMAIN SCALE : 1/4" =1'-0" DATE FLOOR ' EXISTING TRANSACTION COUNTER TO REMAIN EXISTING PAINTED GYP. BD WALL ON INSIDE FAC[ OF CONCRETE BLOCK TO REMAIN (~/~/~ EXIBTING ILLUMINAR_O EXIT SIGN WITH EMERGENCY LIGBT FIXTURES OVER DOOR TO REMAIN J I EXIBTING Sr(,REFRONT AND 6w x 7 O' / FORMER GARAGE DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED DOUBLE ~ , ASS DOOR UNiT IN FORMER OVERF ,'\D GARAGE DOOR OPENING PLAi4- DEMOLITION ~TH METAL STUD INSULATED WALL WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE. ACCORDING FO PREVIOUS PLANS, TRENCH FOOTING 8" X 48" WAS INSTALLED BEFORE WALL FILL WAS INSTALLED. FINIBHES' SCALE : FLOOR CIERAb_' TILE WALLS-- PAINT: GYPSUM BOARD/CMU IILOCK CEILING- PAiN~LB GYPSUM BOARD @ 1f-H" (EXCEPT UTILITY RM IS UNFINISHED) BUILDING NOTES- THE PROPOSED BUILDING MODIFICATION IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. AS SUCH, THE ALTERATtON MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 8 OF THE "EXISTING BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE". 2007 VERSION (AS PER SECTION 50D.2). FORMER OCCUPANY WAS CLASSIFIED AS GROUP F-1 WITH HAZARD CATEGORY 4. NEW OCCUPANC~ IS CLASSIFIED AS GROUP M WITH HAZARD CATEGORY .3. THERE IS NO CHANGE IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN tMPORTANCE FACTORS. 5. ARTIFICIAL LIGHT AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE BUILDING. PROJECT: LAHTI CONSULTING, P.C. -~..=.~ 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 ¢' '.(651) 751-6455 WILLIAM :ONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION 3UILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL NEW YORK P.E, LICENSE NO, 068377 NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE NO. 57551 CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. 25522 VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. 041658 NORTH CAROLINA P,E. LICENSE NO. 051095 MASSACHUSE'Frs P.E. LICENSE NO. 46420 DATE r ,~WINO J0wo# JREV 10/20/08 STORE FLO')R PLAN J A-1 L SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 STOREFRONT GLAZING TO REMAIN (COLOR: BRUSHED ALUMINUM) EXISTING 2' HIGH KNEE WALL WAS RAISED TO 42" AFF BY INSTALLATION OF CONCRE~] BLOCK AND BRICK VENEER FACADE (COLOR: SHERWlN WILLIAMS IVORY) FRONT EXISTING SIOREFRONT AND 6'W X 7'-0" DOUBLE GLASS DOOR UNll IN FORMER OVERNEAD GARAGE DOOR OPENING ELEVATION (SOUTH FACE) SCALE : 1/~" =1' 0" EXISTING ALUMINUM CAP FLASNINO (COLOR: LIGHT BROWN) EXISTING SHINGLED MANSARD ROOF (COL©R: MAIEC'S NANTUCKET LIGHT BIEGE) (COLOR: WHITE) VENEER (COLOR: SHERW~N WILLIAMS IVORY) GARAGE DOOR OPENING NOW SEALED WITH METAL STUD INSULATED WALL WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE, ACCORDING TO PREVIOUS °l ANS, TRENCH FOOTING 8" X 48'" WAS INSTALLED BEFORE WALL FILL WAS INSTALLEO GRADE GRADE FORMER RESTROOM DOOR OPENINGS NOW SEALED WITH METAL STUD INSULA~:D WALL WITH BRICK VENEER FACADE. LEFT SIDE ELEVATION {WEST FACE) SCALE: EXIS~ND ALUMtNUM CAP FLASMING (COLOR: LIDHT BROWN) EXIS~NG SHINGLED MANSARD ROOF (COLOR: MAIEC'S NANTUCKET LIGHT BIEDE) TRIM (COLOR: WHITE) STOREFRONT GLAZING TO REMAIN (COLOR: BRUSHED ALUMINUM) BRICR VENEER (COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS IVORY) IS THE RESPONSIRILB'¢ OF TIRE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS AND ~ECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF )NSTRUC]ION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONELICT WITH TI-IE DOCUMENTS !LATIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, SITE CONBITIONS OR APPLICABLE CODES, IT IS THE ]NTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIP~ THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD IN ~ITING. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUE JLURE BY TIlE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUIE ;CEPTANCE OF FULL RESPONSIBILITY BY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE THE SCOPE WORK AS DEFINED BY TFIE DRAWINGS AND IN FULL COMPIJANCE WITN LOCAL ;GULA]IONS AND CODES ALTERATION OF THESE OOCUMENTS, UNLESS MADE BY A J ;ENSED PROF., IS A VIOLATION OF SEDTION 7209 OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW. NO. REVISION DATE DRWN APPR NO. REVISION D',_ ~. J DIST 1000 PROJEC] SECT 102 BLK 5 LOT 26 JOB NO. DATE DRWN APPR 08-045 10/20/D LAHTI WILLIAM d. LAHTI CONVERSION OF SERVICE STATION BUILDING TO CONVENIENCE STORE DRAWING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DWG#A_2 JREV ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, P.C. 207 HALLOCK ROAD, SUITE 212 BROOK, NY 11790 STONY ~ L~(631) 751-6¢55 ~ NEW YORK P.E. LICENSE NO. " NEW JERSEY P.E. LICENSE NO. CONNECTICUT P.E. LICENSE NO. VIRGINIA P.E. LICENSE NO. NORTH CAROLINA P,E. LICENSE NO. MASSACHUSE%IS P.E. LICENSE NO. 068577 57551 25322 041658 051095 46420 SITE: VALERO SERVICE STATION 28975 ROUTE 25 CUTCHOGUE, NY ~1935