Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/12/2008FOR DISCUSSION 8/12/08 Animal Shelter Change Order - Change in contract - Needs change officially approved CC5 CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS/L. I. PHONE (831) 727-8604 FAX (631) 727-8605 jul), 25, 2008 James A. Richter, R.A. Town of Southold 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold Nh' 11971 Re: Southold Town Animal Shelter - PCO #1 ~r. Richter: Please review and process the following change order; 1) Furnish and install a 21" extension for the GIS200 Hair Trap due to building sanitat3, inverts being lower than shown on plans. a) Labor $0.00 b) Material $8~559.73 2) Furnish and install openings required for HVAC duce.york after framing is complete; large openings in Storage 19, Electric Room 27, 3 box-outs in Kennel 15 and Isolation Room and 3 box-outs in Corridor. a) Labor $2,661.00 b) Material $800.00 3) Relocate attic stairs due to M2EP clearence issues. a) Labor $242.00 b) Material $20.00 4) Lower StaffRoom and Shower ceiling due to MEP clearence issues. a) Labor $242.00 b) Material $20.00 5) Credit for approval of alternate gutter and leader system. C$2,100.001 Subtotal $10.444.73 12~;hga~m~kl~:o~ $1.044.47 Bonds and Insurance 8574.46 Regards, Eric Baumack Project Manager Total 812.063.66 36 EArn' 2ND STREET, RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 Inc. Care Facility Engineering 866.DLI.7078 AIR TOLL FREE WATER POWER 860.889.7078 T ILLUMINATION 860.204.0419 F NOISE 116 MAIN STREET FIRE SAFETY NORWICH, CT 06360 GREEN SYSTEMS WWW. DESIGN LEARNED.COM James Richter, Town Engineer Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 (631)76%1560 (T) (631 )765 -9015 (F) iamie.richter(a~town.southold.n v. us Monday, August 11, 2008 Mt. Richter, I have reviewed the change order submitted by Construction Consultants and do not have any issues with the modifications required to coordinate all disciplines involved in this project. It is apparent that most, if not all, of these changes were the result of anticipated, in the field, coordination due to the complexity of the engineering systems associated with this type of building. I do have a couple of comments regarding the fees associated with the hair trap extension collar: When the invert for the hair trap drainage line was verified, and the depth of the unit was lower than expected, 1 contacted the Rockford Company to discuss options. The representative I spoke with informed me that a simple extension collar would make up the difference but stressed that we should have this collar factory installed prior to delivery to the site (I emphasized this in subsequent correspondence with CCLI). It was my understanding at the time that the unit had not yet been ordered and that the extension collar would be requested as directed from the manufacturer. The costs associated with retrofitting the extension collar after delivery would be much greater than requesting this feature, up front, as part of the initial pumhase order. Mr. Learned and I happened to be on site when the hair trap was delivered on January 14t~, 2008 and no extension collar was observed on the unit. My only question regarding the fees requested for the extension collar ($8,559.73) is whether a significant percentage was the result of a retrofit on site or, if the extension collar was factory installed, were there charges associated with the delivery and return of the hair trap (with no extension) observed on January 14t~ of this year? Please let me know if there is anything else you need from me at this time. Sincemly, John T. Burgess, BS, MS Staff Engineer, DLI