Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-87.-7-2.1
L. OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Gerard Goehringer, Chair Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals From: MarkTerry, Principal Planner ~ LWRP Coordinator Date: October 2, 2009 Re: ZBA File Reference No. 6329 SCOPAZ SCTM# 87.-7-2.1 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this depaKment, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 August 7, 2009 Mark Terry, Senior Enviromnental Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No.//6329 (SCOPAZ) Dear Mr. Terry: We have received an application for additions and alterations i~'~ecohi¢. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Encls. Very truly yours, ~ ~-. ~ Gerard P Goehdnger'~-, P2)[ Chairmat~ )(~') t X~ ~ NOTICE ' ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (~) ,,,,,~,~.,.~,~,.~o~ ~lRed ~o~rty Tax ~vlce A~y mn w SOUTHOLD 086 APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS For Office Use Only Fee: $__ Filed By:_ Date Assigned/Assignment No. _ Office Notes: Parcel HouseNo.~.~/)iT Street //n/~/,/z}/¥/ SCTM 1000 Section. f(~ Block.r I OV)~) A~'?~AL xm~ WmTT~N D~ammm~ATION m* Tm~ ~JIrJ)INa ~sPrcroR Applicant/Owner(s): Mailing Address: _ ~ Telephone: ~, ~ I 2OO9 NOTE: In addition to the above please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, buiJdar, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Authorized Representativ .. for ( ) Owner, or ( ) Other: Address: Telephone: PI.~. check box to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: /~ApplicanUOwner(s) CI Authorized Representative 13 Other Name/Address: WIiEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED ,JR t.¥ 2/t ~(Y~ FOR: ~uilding Permit [] Certificate of Occupancy [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy [] Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Construction DOther: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article )~ J { ( Section 280- ( I h~ -,- 24~D -- ~c/ Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: l~/~, Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ~ A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. [] Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section [] Reversal or O~her A prior appeal)~, has (3 has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Apoeal No. q~]~-~'ear /q~(b. (Please be sure to-~esearch before completing this questio~'or call our office to assist you.). 0~/27/2009 08:07 765664~ BOARD OF TRUSTEES "FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 22, 2009 TO: Tom Samuels for J & L Scop~ 25235 Main Road Cutchoguc, NY 11935 Please take notice that your application dated July 21, 2009 For permit for additlordalterations to an existing dwelling at Location of property: 6300 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 8~6 Block 7 Lot 2.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The construction, on this 2.5 acre lot in the R80 District, is not permitted pursuant to Artide XXIII, Section 280-116 which states: "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead .... exists & which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75' from the bulkhead." The proposed addition is setback approximately 41' from the bulkhead. Also, the construction is not permitted pursuant to Article III, Section 280-14, which states: "No building ... shall be erected or altered in the AC, R80, .._Districts unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule incorporated into this chapter with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein full." The required side yard setbacks are 20' minimum, 45' combined. The proposed setbacks are approximately 10'-10" minimum & 39' combined. The required rear yard setback is 75'. The proposed setback is approximately 73'-10". AppemN~ 2367 ACTION OF TnxzoNmGsoA~DoFAt~PEA~O~T~ET°wNOFs°UT~OLD To Cecelia Ewald & Frances P. Kozlowsky (R. Bruer, Esq.) 3376 Edgarton Avenue Wantaugh, NY © O ~Dec. 1 1977 AC"~O~ OF m,'SZZON"mOBOAB.~OF-'d~]trALS Dated November 16, 1977 ,,tame. e-d~theZonm~ofAppeab~. December 1, 1977 ( ) c~m~b~ .... 8~30 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Cecelia Ewald and Frances P. Kozlowsky, 3~76 Edgarton Avenue, Wantaugh, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient width. Location of prop- erty: south side Indian Neck Road, Peconic, New York, bounded on the north ~y Indian Neck Road; east by Sue O'Dell; south by Peconic Bay; west by Helen Rust. (would not) SEE REVERSE After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicants requests.permission to divide property with in- eufficient width , south side Indian Neck Road, Peconic, New York. The findings of the ~oard are that the applicants' pro- posed division of the property is not conducive to the creation of additional lots which would be undersized on one~ dimension. The Board finds that strict application of theOrdinance. would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship~ the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the sa~e use district~ and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and wi1! observe the spirit of the Ordinanoe. THEP~FOP~ IT WAS RESOLVED, Cecelia Ewald and'Frances P. KoslowBky, 33?6 Edgerton Avenue, Wantaugh, New York, be GRANTED permission to divide property with insufficient width, south side Indian Neck Road, Peconic, New York, as applied for, subject to the following conditions= 1. There shall be no further division of either of the two lots created by this action. 2. There shell he no diminution of the side yard requirements on any structures that may be built on the lots created by this action. Vote of the Board= Ayes= - Messrs= Gilltsp&e, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gera~d R Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen. Ir. Jaraes Dinizio, Jr. gober~ A. ~]lla Lydia A. Torture BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 26, 1996 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Southeld Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sou6adid, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 ZBA 14392 - ALEX KOZLOWSKY, TRUSTEE: FRANCES KOZLOWSKY LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 6300 Indian Neck Lane, peeoni% NrY COUNTY TAX MAP DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 86, BLOCK 7, LOT 2.1 ALSO SEE PRIOR ZONING RESTRICTIONS IN FORCE under Appl. #2367 (Kozlowsky) rendered as part of subdivision on 12/t/1977. BASIS OF APPEAL: The May 7, 1996 AppLication to Building Inspector for a permit to construct accessory tenDJs court with fencing, disapproved by Action of the Building Inspector dated May- 21, 1996, under Article III, Section 100-33B4 and Section 100-231, pertaining to excessive height of fence in a front yard location. RELIEF REQUESTED: Location of ten, als court with court fencing at a height up to 10 feet (maximum) in a front yard area at less than the required 20 feet (lot baying at least 80,000 sq. ft. of total land are~). Amended "rough" sketch map shows tennln court with feno~ng to enclose an area of 54 ft. wide by 114 fi. deep, with a setback at not less than 10 feet figure the e~storly side property line and the remaini~ 23 feet from the westerly property line. MOTION BY Member Villa, SECONDED BY Member Doyen ACTION/RESOLUTION ADOPTED: Granted with the following conditio~ta: 1) 54 ft. width by 114 ft. deep black fence enclosure, for tennln court use; (2) Setbacks shall not be closer than 10 feet to the easterly side property li~e in accordance with side yard requirements provided in 1977 zoning code regdiatio~s and restrictiol~s of prior Appeal No. 2367 rendered 12/1]1977 pertaining to the land division; (3) 8 ft. high pine trees shall be planted and continuously maintained on the westerly side of the property as agreed, with additional evergreens or other screeaing determined after an on-site inspection (expected in the Fall 1996) by Chairperson and one ZBA member; (4) Owner, subsequent owners, its successolm, and/or assigns, shall continuously malnta/n evergreen ser~enlnC a distance of ~15 ft. in good condition at all times (along the westerly prope~-ly line) wh/le the temlis cou~t is in existence; Page 2 - Appeal No. 4392 Application of ALEX KOSLOg/SKy, TRUSTEE Decision Rendered June 26, 1996 issued, and certificate of occupancy for the same once built and inspected. REASONS/FINDINGS: Unable to build court in any other area ~rithout a varisnce. Although the current variauee request is substantial meeting only 50~ of today's requirements (10 ft. instead of 20 ft.), however its leca~ion will conform with the 19~7 ZOning code side yalxi setbacks applicable when this lot was recogl~ised and approved by the Town; the. relief requested is the mi~'ir~lm nec~at-y to afford relief; the relief requested is related to the narrow layout of the isnd wlth a noncOnforming lot width; the setback reduction is not unreasonable under the ~ta~ess, and a grant ef the variance wlqt continue to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood a~d the h~alth, sa[ety and welfare of the community without detriment to ad~o;~;nE properties. VOTE OF THE BOARD: Ayes: Serge J. Doyen, James D~ui~o, Jr., Robert A. Villa, Lydia A. Tortora, Gerard p. Goehriuger. Tkis resolution was u~nimous]3/ adopted. App~ved for Filing-/ ~/ -- GERARD P. GOEHRINGER / ' Scopaz #1000-86-7-2.1 ZBA File Area Variance Reasons: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties of granted, because: a. The existing residence and the adjoining Studio/Miller residence were constructed before the adoption of Section 280-116, which mandates a 75 foot rear yard setback from the bulkhead. b. The existing residential structure is in conformance with the zoning requirements that were in effect at the time of its construction. c. The new garage (under construction) is in conformance with the current, more restrictive setback requirements. d. The proposed addition will consist ora one and one/half story addition to the west and north of the existing residence. e. The proposed addition will expand the existing 886 sq ft of the first floor by an additional 1,215 sq fl., but will not substantively change the exist'rog floor plan, roof line, exterior appearance, sid'mg or design of the existing residence, and will facilitate better use of the existing interior space, particularly the living room. f. The extended roof line of the 8 foot addition (parallel to the waterfront) will be approximately 17 feet in height, about 7 feet lower than the highest point of the existing roof. g. The subject residence is located on the site of"The Mooring", a house built by the artist Irving Ramsey Wiles and his wife. A subsequent owner, Kozlowsky, demolished this structure in 1980, and replaced it with the currem residence in a modem architectural style that mimics the historic Wiles Art Studio on the abutting property to the east. h. The architectural aspect of the proposed addition was designed to respect the historic significance and architectural character of the Wiles Art Studio, now the Miller residence. (A copy of part oftbe SPLIA file entry for the Studio/Miller residence is attached.) i. The proposed addition will be sited slightly more than the required minimum of 25 feet fi'om the easterly side yard facing the Studio/Miller residence. j. The proposed addition is sited so as to minimize visual impacts on the Beaney residence, which is located approximately 70 feet away, to the northwest of the subject residence. When completed, the proposed addition will reduce the distance between these two residences to 50 feet. k. The Beaney residence is situated 159 feet from the waterfront and its septic system is located in the waterfront-facing yard, about 40 feet west of the proposed addition to the subject residence. Future expansions of the Beaney residence are not likely to be extended into the area of its existing septic system. The easterly wall of the Beaney residence (approximately 100 feet in length) is situated 22.8 feet west of the subject property's west boundary. 1. The proposed addition is sited so as to retain the visual and privacy benefits provided by two significant stands of mature rhododendron ' ~ Scopaz #1000-86-7-2.1 ZBA File (2) (3) bushes and mixed woods (containing birch, locust, oak and Norway spruce trees) located to the northwest and northeast, respectively, of the subject residence. Preserving these mature stands of vegetation will avoid the disruption of visual site lines to and from the Beaney and subject residences, as well as between the Miller and Beaney residences. The subject property owners are constructing a conforming detached garage with dimensions 24 by 36 feet (Building Permit # 34770, see attached materials) north of the easterly stand of mature vegetation, so as to maintain its visual and privacy values to both neighbors as well as themselves. Please refer to the attached pages of photographs which illustrate the location and perspectives of the following: subject lot, residence, garage, mature vegetation, and neighboring residences owned by Beaney and Miller. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: a. The subject property owner did not want the proposed expansion of the residence to destroy key elements of the original structure, or to require significant reconstruction of the existing structure. b. The location of the existing septic system prevents significant expansion of the easterly portion of the subject house to the north. c. The close proximity of the existing stands of mature vegetation to the north provides significant scenic and privacy values to the subject property as well as the adjoining residences. The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: a. The subject property is non-conforming in width relative to that required by the Zoning Code for the R-80 district. The subject property is 87.86 feet wide, as is that of the Studio/Miller residence to the east. i. The Zoning Board of Appeals authorized the split of the subject lot from the easterly lot in 1977. (A copy of Appeal # 2367, Ewald & Kozlowsky, is attached.) b. The proposed addition will be located slightly more than the required 25 feet minimum from the easterly side yard facing the Studio/Miller residence. c. The Studio/Miller residence received a variance in 1998 (Appeal # 4550, Ruth Miller) to reduce its total combined side yards from 45 feet to 32.9 feet (26.5 feet if measured to step area). d. The requested variance for the Scopaz property will reduce the total combined side yards from 45 feet to 39 feet, with the 20 foot side yard minimum reduced to 10 feet 10 inches. i. The westerly side yard reduction will not impede the views from or the functioning of the Beaney residence due to the maintenance of extant mature vegetation between the two properties. 2 (4) e. The property to the west, Beaney, (SCTM # 1000-086-07-1) is three acres in area and only 100 feet wide; thus is non-conforming relative to the minimum width required by the Zoning Code for the R-80 district. i. That residence is set back 159 feet from the bulkhead. f. The existing residence is located approximately 72 feet 6 inches from the rear property line. The proposed $ foot extension of the south wall will be approximately 73 fern 10 inches from that line. g. The existing residence is located approximately 45 feet from the bulkhead, and the proposed 8 foot extension of the south wall will be in line with the rest of the wall, thus will be the same distance from most of the bulkhead, except for that part of the bulkhead that jogs slightly northward at this point. The southwest comer of the proposed addition will be 42 feet 9 inches from the front of the new bulkhead, and 41 fee~ from the back of the old bulkhead. h. Although the subject property is 2.542 acres in area and cannot be further subdivided, the owners faced a series of challenges to expanding and renovating their residence to make it more suitable for year-round living: namely the location of the existing septic system, the architectural and cultural significance of the Studio/Miller residence) and their desire to retain the significant visual qualities and privacy afforded by the mature stands of rhododendrons and trees to the northeast and northwest of the subject residence. i. The owners are in the process of ennstrueting a conforming detached garage north of this stand of mature vegetation in order to avoid removing this vegetation and to minimize the potential impact on both neighbors. j. Emergency access to the front and sides of the subject residence will be maintained by means of a new footpath from the combined driveway/parking area to the easterly (25 foot) side yard and a ten foot cleared area between the proposed addition and the west side yard, as well as a fifteen foot wide walkway to the from (north) yard from the driveway/parking area adjoining the garage. k. A reduction in the western side yard from the required 20 feet to 10 feet 10 inches is the minimum relief necessary to achieve the desired expansion given the aforenoted challenges without destroying the scenic and privacy values afforded to all three residences in the immediate vicinity by the extant mature stands of rhododendron and tree vegetation. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood or district because: a. Existing mature stands of vegetation will be left in place, thereby ensuring privacy and scenic vistas for the neighboring residences, relative to each other, as well as the subject residence b. The existing septic system will be left in place. c. The 8 foot extension of the westerly side of the subject residence will be in line with the existing foundation, which is at no closer than 72 feet 6 inches northward of the tie line (mean high water mark) and 42 feet 9 3 Scopaz (5) #1~0-86-7-2.1 ZBA File inches northward of the new bulkhead and 41 feet northward of the old bulkhead. (The proposed addition will extend the south foundation wall another 8 feet in line with the existing wall and more or less parallel to the bulk of the existing bulkhead. However, since the western part of the bulkhead jogs north slightly, the distance between the southwest comer of the proposed foundation wall and the bulkhead will be 41 feet.) The existing 24 foot elevation of the subject property at the southernmost point of the existing and proposed foundation will be left untouched. Proper construction and buffering methods will be used to protect the integrity of this bluff face and its vegetation during and after construction. All stormwater run-offis currently directed into drywells located north of the subject residence, away f~om the waterfront~ This practice will be continued with the addition. The subject property is currently graded so as to direct surface stormwater landward (away from) the bluff face. This slope and grading will not be changed during conslmction. Has the alleged difficulty been self-created: NO. See Section (3) above for relevant details. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: NO This is the MINIM~ that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. The property owner discussed the proposed plans with both adjoining neighbors prior to submitting thipra~plic~don. /, //~{gnature of ApCant / O '~Swom to before me this day of ~ , 2009. (~UALFIED II -- 4 BUILDING-STRUCTURE INVENTORY FORM DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION NEW YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION ALBANY, NEW YORK 15181 474-0479 YOUR NAbIE: Town Of Southold/SPLIA YOUR ADD~ESS:Towrl H~ll. Main Road t~ ST RUC'I I. IRAL SYSTEM: . lif ~no, vnl FOR OFFICE USE ONLY UNIQUE SITE NO, QUAD SERIES ' NEG. NO DATE: November 1986 .TELEPHONE( ~16 ) 76 5-1892 Southold, L.I., N.Y. 11971 ORGANIZATION (if any)~outhold Town Community Development Office IDENTIFICATION I. BUII.DINGNAME(S): TT'X"Jri~ W~n' ~u~ "The 2. COUNTY: .q~e'rn'lk TOWN/CITY: .qe~rt:.hn7 d VILLAGE:~ 3. STREET LOCATION: _Drivn%.o road off Ind~nn Nnck 4. OWNERSIIIP: a. public [~] . . . h. priva.le [] 5. PRF~SENTOWNER: O,C. Ewald ' ADDRESS. inc~ian Neck Lane 6. USE: Original: ~;'h, lldJo Present; Residence 7. ACCL~;SIBILITY TO PUBLIC: Exledor visible from public road: Yes ~ No ~-I Inlet(or accessible: Explain. DESCRIPTION '"' *" ,-,~r. *-/,~ ,- -r~ ' ~. ? ; 8. BUILI)I.~¢; ,~.- c ?.:"clapbohrd {~ ~ f b. slo~n~ [] ;" c. ~fi'ck'l~ od. board ~nd b,?ten a. wood (~ame with inteducking joints [~ · b. wood frame wilh light members.~ ,. ltl CONDITION: I. INTE(;RITY. c. masonry Ioadbearingwalls[~].., . ..... ~'- d. melal (explain) e. other t a. excellent ~{J b. good [] c. fair [-] d. deteriorated I--I a. original sile [] b. moved [] ' ' If so,when? · - ' c. Iisi major alleiations and dales (if known): XYZZZ-12 12. PIIOTO: ]Prom north-~es'l; North facade and west elevation PE 21 After the de~th of Wiles' daughter Gladys.who wa8 . a painter, ~he studio stood vacant and was vandalized. In 1979 it was restored b~ Rbt. Bayley. architect.' 13. MAP: N.Y,S-, DOT Southold Quad H No 14. THREATS TO BUILDING: a. none knov;n [~] d. dcvelopels [] f. u~her: 15. RELATED OU~[BUILDINGS AND P~P[RTY: 16. SURROUNDINGS OF THE b. ,',,ning [] c~ roads [_'] ~. bagniO} b. carriage house [] c. gaf.~ge [~ d. pm3 [] e. ~hed ~ ' f. greeohouse [~ g. shop ~ 'h. g~rden~ ~ ' i. landscape features: cottage j. olher:Rus~i~ fence alo~ Indt~ Neck Rd, a~) BUILDING (chtck more than one if necess:.y): a~ en~r~ce % a. ope. land ~ b. woodland ~ ~0 proper~y ' c. $calte~ed buildinD ~ d. den~ly bulb-up ~ e. commeccial ~ [. i.dust{la[ ~ g. {esidenllal ~ h. othe~: beach and bay 17. INTI-RRELATIONSIIIP OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: (Indi,.ate if buildmg or slruclure is in an historic district) On the south side the house overlooks the beach and -Peconic Bay. Flights of steps lead down the cliff to the beachfront. On the north side large studio windows overlook the clearing and the forest behind it. 18. OTHER NO~ABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE (inclnding interio~ feature,~ if$:.,~wnl: Front entrance appears to be from an early 1800 house~as i1~ is in the Greek-Revival style with pilasters and leaded glass, side lights and transom. See forms F~. 22, PE 23 and PE 36 for other Peconic artists. SIGNIFICANCE I'.L DAli! CE INIllAL ('ONSTRLr( lION: 1903'* ARCIIITECT: BUILDER: 2, HISI'ORICAI. ANDAR£11HFCTURALIMI~RIANCF' Irving Wiles' house and studio Were the first to be on Indian Neck Lane overlooking the bay. The two were joined together by a porch. The studio (~ ]1 ]~ ~ ~ ~ stood a few feet further west. The windows cn the are exact replicas of the original ones, and so a~.'~? c.i'.,~ windows on the south side, except for the round window in the gable.* Irving Wiles (1861-1948) taught painting durin~ the summer in this studio. This house is a cultural landmark and recalls the da?'~:, eac] in this century when Peconic had its colony of artists. 2L SOURCES: Conversation w~th Nra. Kozlowsky 8/31/8o (see PE.21) **LonM Island Traveler-WDtchman."?5 years ago".lO/12/7~ "Artists of Suffolk County, Part I" Heckscher Museum, ~. TH[Mr: Catalog 1970. From prepared by Rosemary Skye Noritt, research assistant. 1986 photo of I~vir~ Wiles' s~;udio fi'om the sou~;h showir~ s~eps ~o beach, Pho2o No., ~-~ XVIII-1) p~ 21~ of entrance today. R~M II-21 1971 photo of Irving Wiles' s$udio showing n~r~h studio window and Greek Revival entrance. SPLIA collection. P~ 21 Irvin~ Wiles s2udi~ and house -1971 photo of Irvin~ Wiles' house which stood adjacent to studio, The house was ~orn down circa 1979 Collections SPLIA 1971 photo of '- ~uStic fence at rosdside ~ entrance to Wiles' studio and house. Collections SPLIA PE 21 N~lson C. Whi%e le~t~r. 1970 N. lson C. White l~tt-r. 1970 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: ~JrP ~ M ~ A ? _ I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas / Please de,scribe areas being removed: Date Prepared: O~f[ff~/O7 1~. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: ,~t3"-~''~ /~/~D~'~ ~ -FL/qt~ Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Ale)~l ~' Height (from finished ground to top of ridge):... :2a.//~t Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: .~_ t ..~ ~ HI. Proposed Construction Description .(Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary) - Please dc,scribe building areas: Number Of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: _ Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: / t/~_ ~-~f~i f~,<~/ IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surv~q.~or): Existing square footage ofbuildings on your prooertv: ~'~'~ ~ '~'~.f(~. Proposed increase of building coverage: ,- ~-V" I ~- I ~ Square footage of your lot: I/O! "7~1 Percentage of coverage of your lot by b~ildi/ag area: -~ ?~7~ V. Purpose of New Construction: J~-N'~/A~D?3/O ~/ffv~tT)O~x/ VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it_~relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 APPEALS BOAIID MEMBERS Gerard P. Goe. kfi~gex, Chairman Jam~s Dinlzio, .Ir. Lydia A. Tor~ora Lora S.~Colllns BOAR1) .OFAPPEALS TOVfN OF SOUTHOLD Southold ToWn l-Isll 53095 Main Road EO. Box 1179 Southol& New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 76~-9064 Telcph0'n~ (516') 765-1~09 F~NDING$, DI~I~tBEEATIONS AND DETERMINATION REGULAR'I~E~ING OF APRIL 30, I998 FL~OI~GS OF FAcT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: BASIS OF APPEALS: Building Inspeetol,'s Action of Disapproval dated Jarrual-y 26; 1998, which 1-eads as follows: ",, ,Please lmke nolic~ that your a!opHcation dated januaey '9, 1998 :fol',l~t to conmimet an addition to an 'existing singl~ family dwellln~ ...is disapproved on ~ following ~Ouncls: the proposed addition being located in a~ R~0. ~Z~me is required $o haVe a ~ide !mrd setback of 20 f~t ~mi~fimum and a ~ombined side yard setback of 45 feet.' thir~,s.t to Article LH~ 100-32 .... " AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED BY APPLICANT: The ~luest made by apl~Hcant is to locate a proposed 20' x 26.2' dwelling addilion with an ea~lm, ely side yami at 18 feet and westeely side yamt at 14.9 to the existing fouadation, ~o1' at 8.5 to the top of the step a~ea. The total side* yarctS io the £oundafion walls at the sides would equal 32.9 feet, and to the top of 'the step a~ea (larger than 5' x 6' code exemption) would .equal ~6,5 feet, The code requirement is 45 ft. total both side REASONS,~/~R BOARD ~IO1~ DESCRIBED (l) The gran,t~ of the area .variance will not produce an undesirable chs-~e in character of neighbo?hood or a detriment to nearby propertie~ because the px-ope~ty .is a heavily ,~v~oded waterfront lot and a row of eve~-reens ~c~eens the addition from view by adjoi-ino~ propertte~ to the Pag~ 2 - Appl. No. ~.~ (R. I~dLter) 1000-86-7-2.2 at Pecontc Board of Appeals April 30, 1998 (2) _'The b~nofit sought'by the applisant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for a~]pHeant to pursue, other tl~n ail al~ val~anc~ because the property is unusually long approximately 1250 feet, bu~ its' narrow 87-foot width prohibits expansion of the dwelltug without a (3) The requested area variance is not substantial in eo~siderlug the modest 20 ft. by 26.2 ft. size of the addition and l~mited width of the lot a~ea. (4) The pl~aosed var~anc~ will not have an advel'se effect o]~ impact on the phF~lcdi or environmental conditions in the neighborh~xl or dlst~lct he.luBe the addition is of mlnlm.! size, and it will be an improvement to the house and nearby properties. (5) The sitnaHon has not been self-e~e~te4 and is due to the unusually long and narrow configuration of the property. in eeas~lez-lug ~hi~ application, the Boa~! deems this action to be the · -ini~um ~eessa~y ,~1 adequate, and ai the same ~e prese~ve~ and protects the character of the neighborhood, and ~ health, safety, we~m-e of the e~mmtt~. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Me~ber Torto~, seconded by Member Collins. it was RESOLd-El), to GRANT the relief as applied. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: M~MBERS GOEIll~INGER, DINIZIO, TORTORA, ltORNIN(~, AND COLLINS. ~ ]~esolu_~n ~as a~lopted by / ~A~ P. ao..~mm~, //// Approved for Fil~ng 5]4]98 ~ECEIVED AND FILED BY T-liE SOUT'rlOLD TOWN CLERK Town Clerk, To~'m of 5outhold AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: The form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit; site plan approvdl, use variance, or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in agricultural district. AH applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Sections 239- m and 239-n of the General Municipal Law. 1) Name ofApplicant: x/~/JA/ /~/, 2) Address of Applicant: p. ty-/~DX 3) Name of Land Owner (if other than applicant) 4) Address of Land Owner:' 5) Description of Proposed Project: 6) Location of Property (road and tax map number): ~--/v/ 7) Is ~e p~cel within ~ a~cultural district? ~No ~Yes If yes, A~cult~al District Number 8) Is this p~cel actively famed? ~No ~Yes 9) Name ~d address of any Owner(s) of land within the agricultural district contaimng active faro operation(s) located 500 feet of the boundau of the proposed project. (~fo~ation may be available t~ou~ the Town Assessors Office. Town Hall location (765-1937~ or from ~y public computer at the Town Hall locations by viewing the parcel numbers on the Town of Southold Real Properly Tax System. Name and Address {Please use back side of page if more than stx property owners are identified.) The lot numbers may be obtai~pd, in advance, when requested from either the Office of the Planning Board at, 765-1938 or ~he Zoz]~ng Boar~/of Appl~als at 765-1809. -~al board will mlicit commmts from ~he own~ of land idmtified above in o~ to consid~ the eff~t of the ~opos~ action on thor faro o~tion. Solicitation will be made by supplying a copy of this stat~mt. 2. Commits r~umed to the I~al board will be tak~ into considmhon as pa~ of the ovmll r~iew of this application. 3. C~i~ of the completed A~cultural Data Statmmt shall be s~t by applicant an~or ~e cl~k of the ~ard to ~e pm~y o~s identifi~ a~ve. ~e cost f~ mailing shall ~ paid by the applicant at the time the application is submitt~ for review. Failure to pay at such time mmns the ~plicanon is not complete and cannot be acted upon by the ~ard 1-14-09 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FII,ING WITH YOIJR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. Is the sUbjec,,t premises listed on the real estate market for sale? [3Yes ,J~No - -i . B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? ~No [3 Yes, please explain on attached sheet. C. 1) Are there areas that contain s~d or wetland grasses? · 2) Are these areas shown on the map submitted with this-~pplieation'~ ¥ ~ 3) Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland ~uilding area? 4) Ifyo6r property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination ofjurisdictionO ,,~4.<~ Please ~--':- in .... ' ~ ~-,mam status oI your ~is~ru~y~;aa~e°~t~ct~h tchfpiTesI~o~eS~'i~tt w~tht~cotn~tio~n~ n~ap~prov~edm~/~.///~f~ a. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near thc area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level~ E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or f~nces that exist and are not§bream on the survey map that you are submitting? ~xtc~ (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist_ Or state "none" on the above line, if applicable.) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Bufldin~ Department and describe: .fl ~r~'~- ~'~ ~%~'-,4~/7;~r'gO ~f//eT~ / G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? ~c~ ~Ifyes, please label the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel ~.~j~ce - _ ~t~t c~/ 1,/ and proposed me ,Yr,,t.~ ~ ~- -/~'-/~ c d ,0 c<" -~/ ~ .~ ' xarapl ' cxi ' - sin le hmi'l ' . v t v~ t.~...)i r~.~ t%rt_~t~ . TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM APPLICABLE TO OWNER, CONTRACT VENDEE AND AGENT: The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid Same. (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying wi ~Omeone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the Other person or Company name.) NATUP~ OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Variance Special' Exception *Other .Appt0val or EXemptiOn -- fi'on5 plat or official map Change of Zone -- Tax Grievance "If"Other,, name the activity: -- Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, ,,parent., or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? Relationshi ,, includes b. blood mfirria -e or business .interest. · armersh~' - m' which' the Town office["or ~m lo 'ce has even a artial ' OWnershi' of' or . .. "Business interest" mear~ a business includin a ~ch the Town officer or em 'lo--ce o -- NO V/_ If you answered "YES", complele the balance of this form and'date andsign where indicated Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between vm~,4r ~,~. .... yourself (the applicant, agent or contract vendee) ahd the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship, in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her~spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the Owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the spplic~int is a corporati6n); B) the legal or beneficial Owner ofanS' interest in a non-corporate entit3, (when the applicant is not a corporation); ~ C) an officer, director, partner, or emplo3,ee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicank DESCRIPTION' OF RELATIONSHIp Submitted this day of Signature: Pr/nt Name: TOWN OF $OUTHOLD P PERT.Y..~ECORD CARD ,.. ~. - iQ©O~-~ ~-'T -~.~ 'WNER STREET /~:~ ~) ~"') VILLAGE DIST. SUB. -'"~'~ ~ . ~a, ~k~ S W ~PE OF BUILDING :S~/p~ S~S. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value ~ND IMP. TOTAL DATE R~RKS ' ' -' ~ / ~T~ ~ ~o //, ~/ ~/,/~ ~/~//~? ~ - ' ' lane FRONTAGE ON WATER 3aland FRONTAGE ON ROAD )use Plot BULKH~D tal Extension Breezeway Garage Patio Total ' ~..~ Foundation ~, 2. Basement .,~ Ext. Walls Fire Place Type Roof ~Z~ Recreation Room ~ Dormer TRIM Bath J Dinette; Floors Interior Finish Heat Rooms 1st Floor Rooms 2nd Floor Driveway LR. DR. BR. FIN. B New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Telephone (516) ~?.4~0365 Facsimile {516) ~.~.~.-0373 LETTER OF NONJURISDICTION TIDAL WETLANDS ACT John P. Cahill Commissioner Febraury 3, 1999 Re: 1-4738-02163/00001 Scopaz Property Construct addition to house John and Linda Scopaz 6300 Indian Neck Road Peconic, NY 10803 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Scopaz: Based on the information you have submitted, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that: The property landward of the bulkhead which was constructed prior to September 20, 1977, as shown on the survey prepared by Roderick VanTuyl dated August 8, 1979 is beyond jurisdiction of Article 25. Therefore, in accordance with the current Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) no permit is required under the Tidal Wetlands Act Please be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the tidal wetlands jurisdictional boundary, as indicated above, without a permit. It is your responsibility to ensure that all necessary precautions are taken to prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation within Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction which may result from your project, such precautions may include maintaining adequate work area between the tidal wetland jurisdictional boundary and your project (i.e. a 15' to 20' wide construction area) or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hay bale berm. Please be further advised that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies. CAF CC: Samuels & Steelman Very truly yours, George W. Hammarth Permit Administrator Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard ~4rea. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A pwposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following phces: online at the Town of Southold's website (sontholdtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the planning Department, all local h~oraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital [] construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [] (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Locationofaction: t) o d Mg-c.l<_ acreage: Z. Preamt land use: Present zoning classification: If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Soulhoid agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Nameofapplieant: x~ ~OqoA 2~- (b) Mailing address: ~ D, ~)D'~ I ~ ~'~"" (e) Telephonenumben. AreaCode( ) (d) Application number, if any:. Will ~ action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a ~va¢ or federal agency? Yes ~] No~'- If yes, which ~te or federal agency?.. / DEVELOPED COAST POLICY ~ /FT?7[d~-/~L~ t°/:~.~- ,~ ~ET'V~.~ Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section m - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [~Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section m - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable L WRP Consistency Asses~nent ~onn Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of ~outhold that enhances cornmunJty character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infra~re, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. YES: The proposed addition will be sited so as to facilitate the renovation and expansion of an existing residence with a minimum of internal and external renovaUons. Except for an 8 foot extension of the existing residential structure parallel to the existing bulkhead, the reminder of the addition will be landward of the existing structure and its current setbacks. Po/icy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Soutl~old. YES. The design and siting of the proposed addition will respect the integrity of the historic Wiles Art Studio on the adjoining property to the eas~ The Art Studio was converted into a residence and is~ identified in the SPLTA inventory. Policy $. Enhance visual (~ualitv and otote~ scenic resources throu_ahout b~e TOWn of Southold. YES. The proposed addition was sited to avoid significant intrusion into mature stands of rhododendron bushes and trees which will help maintain the secluded and aesthetic qualities of the site. Maintaining the bushes and trees also will protect the visual quality and scenic resources of adjoining residences. There will be no signir~ant changes to the exisUng roofiine as viewed from the water, since the addition will extend only 8 feet west and that extension will be on the first floor only. Since no vegeta~on is being removed seaward of the existing first floor residence, the potential impact of the new addition on the visual quality of the shoreline (as seen from the water) will be minimal. The addiUon will be sided with the same type of red cedar used on the existing house. The two adjoining residences are also sided with cedar. Polio/4. Minimize loss of life. sb'uctures, and natural resources from ftoodinq and eros/on. YES. No portion of the proposed addition will be placed closer to the waterfront than the existing seaward-facing foundation and wall of the fi,~;, floor. Further, this addition will extend westward (parallel to the shoreline) only 8 feet. The first floor of the existing residence is S~opaz SCT~4 100-8~-7-2.1 situated 24 feet above sea level, and is located 42 feet 8 inches from the bulkhead, ad 74 feet from the mean high water mark. There will bo no removal of vegetation or regarding southward (seaward) of the existing first floor eleva~oo durin~ the construction of the addition. PO#o/~ Protect and/m,~rove wate~ c~ua/Ev a~ ~ /n ~e Town o~ ~ YES. No ~~n ~11 ~ur ~r ~e p~a~ well su~i~ ~ ~en~. ~ ~ ~ pm~ a~n, ~ im~o~ su~ a~ is ~ing a~. ~1 ~,,.w~r m~ll ~ ~n~l~ la~, ~ ~e no~ ~ ~ ~n and ~ha~ ~ d~ells. Polio/6. Protect and restore the aualitv and func/fon of ~ Town of ~ms inc/udina ~ian#cant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wet/ands. YES. The proposed addition is intended to expand the first floor living area, is modest in size and is being sited so as to result in the least removal of mature vegetation. There will be no intrusioo or impact seaward of the existing structure. PO/icy 7. Protect and improve air aualitv in the Town of Southold. Not Applicable PO/icy (~. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of ~outhold from ~ol/d waste and hazamb~ substances and wa~. Not Applicable. Pollo/9. Provide for oubti¢ access to. and recreadooal use of. coastal waters. oublic /ands. and oublic resources of the Town of Southold. Not Applicable. PoI~O~ 10. Protect ~outholds. water-deoendent USeS andpromote sidng of new water-d _esendent u~s in suitable locations. Not Applicable, PoI~o~ 11. Promote su~taioable use of lMng ma#ne resources in Lona Idand ~ound. the Peconic Estua/l/ and Town waters. Not Applicable. PoI/O/12. Protect aoricultural lands in the Town of Southold. Not Applicable. Almost all of the subject property is covered with mature woods. Poi~O~ 13. Promote ao~roodate use and development of ene~_ ¥ and mineral resources. 2 YES. The proposed renovations and addition will include upgrades to more energy-efficient heating/cooling systems, insulation and electrical appliances. 3 PROJECT ID NUMBER PART 1 - PROJECT iNFORMATION 1, APPLICANT I SPONSOR 617.20 APPENDIX C STATE EN~RONMENTAL QUAUTY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only ( To be c~nplmed by Applicant (x Project Sponsor) 8EQR / PAra II- I~PACI' ASSESSMENT (re be eompte~d I~ Lead I-I I-1"o B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED FL~/IEW AS PRODDED FOR UNUSTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 ff NO, a ~ C. COULD AGllON RESULT IN ANY ADVT*:RSE k-I'-I-C-CTS ASSOCIAll~D wrn4 THE FOLLOWING: (Answe~ may b~ rmndw~lten, il le~aje) I D. WILL TH~ pRO. LCCT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHRRACI~RISTIC~ THAT CALl,ED THE ESTABLKSIIMENT OF A CRITICAl l PART I~1 - I~-, ~a~e~l1110# OF 8IGNRANCE Go be oomple~ed by Aom~/) effect shoukl be emm~sed in connec~ with I~s (a) sel~g (Le. urban ~. n~ral}; (b) p~bability o¢ occuning geographic smpe;and (t) magnitude. If ner~----~,addat/ac~mer~ 0r re~mnceaupp~tingnmterials. EEnsurelhalexplanationaco~tain sufficient de,ab to show that all relevant adveme impa~ls imve been identified and adequately ad~essed, tf ques#on d of part i was checked WILL NOT result in any $ignidcant adve~e emri~lmenlal impac~ A.NO iwlRCde, on attachments as neoe~sa~y. Itm masons Date CHECKED BY: LOCATION MAP SITE D A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OWNER. JOHN & LINDA SCOP~ ~ ~ ~, ~ : ~ SURVEYOR: NATHANCORWIN ~ 322 ROANOKE AVENUE ~ ~ ~ RIVERH~D, NY t190~ PROPOSED SITE COVE~GE: 3085 sf = 2.79% ALLOWABLE SITE COVE~GE: 20% LPlN~ SIT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" EXlSTF 5T0t~,¥ F~5IDEN~-.~= ~/~A.~EI'4~NT (LIGHT ~ HAT~,H) ;/ REGULATORY APPROVALS SET 5TORPr' A~2~21 0803 DRAWN BY: TCS CHECKED BY: DATE: 719109 SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" HEET TITLE: SITE PLAN HEET NO: PARTIAL SI SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" PLAN REGULATORY APPROVALS SET ~-Zlg z I..11 ~ - ./~ z~/~, .0_ ,~r/,,, · 0803 CHECKED BY: DATE: 7/09/09 SCALE: 1" = 20"0" SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NO.: 2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Pf~OPOSEO AOOITION 5HORN ~AP.,I<, HALL BATH. BATH I I FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 114' = 1'-0' I I I FI..~3R ~ O~ A4:~'ITION IN ~ itSAC~, I REGULATORY APPROVALS 0803 TCS DATE: 719109 SCALE: 114" = 1' - 0" SHEET TITLE: FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: 3 .~(I?-'TIN~ ~OP .~TRu~'ruI~ TO R~HAIN ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = I'~)" UTILITY POOH LINE Of= GANTII. EVEf~E~ BAY ABOVE ~" 11~K. f~EINFORC~D CONG. FOJN~ATION ON ~xl~ F-OOTIk~ PROPOS~ A~IALT RC~3f=IN~ ~t-IIN~L-~ ON PLYiq~. ~IN~ ON ~x~RR BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: tl4" = t"4)" REGULATORY APPROVALS SET 0803 TCS )ATE: 7/9/09 SCALE: 114" = 1' - 0" SHEET TITLE: BASEMENT & ROOF PLANS 4 IIII E,)(le',TIN~ ~I, JILOIN~ TO R~VlAIN SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 111 L .L j WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = t'-0" ~ ~ AODITION I~C,E~AI~ .~HINE~E ~ FINISH $ A,,SPHA~T ~ ~rllN~l I=~ .~XlE~TIN~ I~JI.L.~IN~ TO REklAIN L EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = t'-0" ~ r' "~ r' '~ L .................................... L_r'_d ...................... J L--J L-.~J .................................................................... ~, NORTH ELEVATION) ........... L ...................................................... ~. - J SCALE: 114" = t'-0" ~- REGULATORY APPROVALS SET z~LU ~.~, 08O3 TCS )ATE: 719/09 ~CALE: 114" = 1' - 0" 3HEET TITLE: ELEVATIONS I SHEET NO: