HomeMy WebLinkAbout6327Office Location:
Town Annex/First Floor, Capital One Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 11971
Mailing Address:
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
http://southoldtown.north fork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064
)ou~i,,~.~: : ~;:Jerl,
FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 2009
ZBA # 6327 - JON and JENNIFER SHIPMAN
Property Location: 4745 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck; CTM 1000-100-4-11.
SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under
consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II
category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA.
SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE REERRAL FOR LOCAL DETERMINATION:
This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code
Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply
stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there
appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact.
PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: This parcel is nonconforming with a size of +/-
43,500 square feet, and improved with a 1700+ square foot, one-story single family
dwelling. The 60.4 foot [length] x 28 foot [width] building is currently 50.2 feet from the
front lot line along Elijah's Lane.
BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance under Section 280-124 based on the
Building Inspector's June 17, 2009 Notice of Disapproval concerning a front porch
addition onto the applicants' existing single-family dwelling. The applicant's building
permit application was disapproved under Town Code Article ×XIII Section 280-124
which requires that lots measuring between 40,000 and 59,999 square feet shall have a
minimum front yard setback of 50 feet. The porch addition, after the completion of
construction, would have a front yard setback of 42.2 feet.
LWRP/EXEMPT: This application is exempt from review under Town Code LWRP
Chapter 268/
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on October 29,
2009, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all
testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the
Page 2 - November 12, 2009
6327 - JON and JENNIFER SHIPMAN
Property Location: 4745 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck
CTM 1000-100-4-11
Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant:
AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicants request an area variance in
order to construct a front porch to their single family dwelling. Based upon information
provided on the applicant's site plan drawn by MCH Design Services, and dated June 2,
2009, the porch is proposed with 29.1 feet in length and an 8 foot depth across the front
yard. The proposed new setback would be 42.2 feet from the front property line along
Elijah's Lane.
REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials
submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings:
1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable
change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The
single family dwelling on this property was built in 1979. The building is located in a
sparsely settled area of an Agricultural District. There are no buildings visible in either
direction, located on the farm land directly across the road from the applicant. The
applicant's rear yard is adjacent to open farm land. The applicant has two neighbors
located directly north along Elijah's Lane, and one neighbor located to the south. No
opposition to.the applicant's proposed front porch has been expressed to this Board by
any of the neighbors.
2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved
by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The
dwelling presently has a front yard setback of 50 feet, and therefore the applicant can
not physically add a front porch with securing a variance.
3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance requested herein is not substantial. The
approximate 16% reduction in the front yard setback from 50.2 feet to 42.2 feet as
requested by!the applicant, in order to have a porch, is deemed by this Board to be not
substantial enough to deny the application.
4. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has not been self created. The single-
family dwelling on this property was built under Building Permit #10270-Z issued June
19, 1979. The applicant bought the property in April 2009.
5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a
variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or
environmental conditions in the neighborhood.
6. Grant of!the relief requested is the minimum action necessary and adequate to
enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a front porch at less than the code-required
setback, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the
health, safety and welfare of the community.
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the
balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member
VVeisman, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, and duly carried, to
Page 3 - November 12, 2009
6327 - JON and JENNIFER SHIPMAN
Property Location: 4745 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck
CTM 1000-100-4-11
GRANT the variance as applied for, and as a based upon the site plan map
dated June 2, 2009.
Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not
shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this
application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not
authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject
property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other
features as are expressly addressed in this action.
The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for
an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehrin~l'~"~Ve~ma,q~ and Schneider.
Member Horning was absent. This Re~s d,~o'~ (.~,)~~_~
/~'er~'l5. Goehringer, Chairman //
~..~l~roved for Filing 11//[/2009'