Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3203 8 7f57 8i--~ ~ 8000 S~ ~e~ C~o~og~e ~educe land area for existing marina by divid, ing premises ~into two parcels, one as a marina and one for residential use, each having insuff uPland area. 104-8-2.1 Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE: ROAD 2S SOUTHOI-D. L.I., N.Y. 11cj'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3203 Application Dated December 20, ]983 TO: Richard T. Haefeli, Esq.. McNulty, DiPietro & Haefeli for 130 Ostrander Avenue, Box 757 Riverhead, NY 11901 NORMAN C. BOOS [Appellant(s)] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on ~_2~_~]~84 the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X]Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X] Request for Variance from Zoning Board of Appeals letter dated June l, 1978 to request additional dockage facilities. WHEREAS, on December 20, 1983, an application for a variance has been filed requesting additional dockage facilities at premises located at the south side of Skunk Lane (Bay Avenue), Cutchogue, New York, now of Norman C. Boos; WHEREAS, since the date of filing this application, an environmental review process has been pending concerning this proposed project; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 1984, this board has been requested to withdraw the subject application, without prejudice: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Appeal No. 3203, application for NORMAN C. BOOS, be and hereby is WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. and Sawicki. (Member Doyen of Fishers tion was unanimously adopted. Goehringer, Grigonis, Douglass Island was absent.) This resolu- DATED: May 8, 1984. Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWS'ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 October 10, 1984 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Allen T. Schwab, President Nassau Farms Association P.O. Box 85 Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Schwab: In response to your letter dated September 27, 1984 regarding the application of Norman C. Boos for additional dock facilities in Broadwaters Cove, Cutchogue, by letter received from the Southold Town Board of Appeals dated May 9, 1984, the Appeal No. 3203 application for Norman C. Boos was withdrawn without prejudice, by resolution adopted by the Board of Appeals. Therefore, Mr~ Boos can not further expand this facility until all approvals are obtained from the Building Department, Board of Appeals, and any other department that would be involved. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferling Secretary to Board cc: Town Clerk Building Dept. Board of Appeals Planning Board Trustees file P. O. Box85 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 September 27, 1984 Chairman, Board of Trustees Town of Southold Mm~n Road Southold, N Y 11971 Dear Sir: It has come to our attenticn that Mr. Norman Boos has ~ol~tarily withdrawn his ~pplicatic~ relative to the expansic~ of his preset m~a cn Broadwaters Cove. We, th~ residers of Nassau Farms, vd particularly those in the immediate area of the marina, have opposed the exps~sic~ of the p~esent facility, k~ were gratified to learn that Mr. Boos had withdrawn his application. Since this is a matter of ocncern to our A~sociatic~ representing the residents of Nassau F-~rms, we respectfully bequest that ~ receive notice in the event that Mr. Boos should elect to reactivate his a~plicatic~ at ~ny ~ in the future. Very truly yours, All~ T. schwab President Jw Southold Town Board of Appeals I~AIN ROAD- ~TATE ROAD 35 ~OUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. TELEPHONE {516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEBRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONI$,JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWiCKI May 8, 1984 Richard T. Haefeli, Esq. McNulty, DiPietro & Haefeli 130 Ostrander Avenue, Box 757 Riverhead, NY ll901 Re: Appeal No. 3203 Norman C. Boos Dear Mr. Haefeli: Attached for your records is a copy of the resolution adopted at our Special Meeting held May 2, 1984, withdrawing the subject application without prejudice as requested. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Enclosure cc: All State, County and Town Agencies · JOHN R. N~CNULTY ARTHUR DiPIETRO RICHARD T. HAEFELI McNULTY, DiPIETRO ~ HAEFELI SOUTHAMPTON OFFICE 2?3 HAMPTON ROAD SOUTHAMPTON* NEW YORK 1196e April 24, 1984 Chairman - Board of Zoning Appeals Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application of Norman Boos Appeal No. 3203 Dear Sir/Madam: Please be advised that this office now represents Mr. Boos with respect to the above and hereby advises you that on behalf of Mr. Boos we are requesting that the above applica- tion be withdrawn at this time without prejudice. RTH:lmw 3;~ry truly yours, Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I.. N.Y. 11~'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, .JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H, SAWlCKI February 15, 1984 To: Mr. Robert F. Flacke, Commissioner N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Wolfe Road Albany, NY 12233 Mr. Thomas J. McDonald N.Y.S. Clearinghouse Division of Budget, State Capitol Albany, NY 12224 L.I. Regional Planning Board Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: Appeal No. 3203 - Norman C. Boos Variance to Expand Nonconforming Marina Pending SEQRA Process Gentlemen: In accordance with the provisions of Section 617.8 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, please find enclosed herewith for filing the following documents: (1) Notice of Positive Declaration with Intent to Prepare DEIS; (2) Initial Declaration with Intent to Prepare LEAF [commenting~ period ended 2/9/84]; (3) February 14, 1984 letter which has incorporated therein resolution of this board of February 11, 1984 deleting areas of concern and reasons for Positive Declaration [3a-c, 7a-c]. Upon receipt of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, a 30-day co~mmenting period will be provided as well as filing of same pursuant to Section 617.10. Yours very truly, lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER Enclosures CHAIRMAN APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER. CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONiS, JR, SERGE DOYEN. JR. ROBERT J, DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board o£Appeals MAIN ROAD- BTATE ROAD 2.5 cIOUTHOLD, L.h, N.Y. TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 NOTICE OF POSITIVE DECLARATION Appeal No. 3203. Application of: NORMAN C. BOOS Location of Property: South Side Bay Avenue, Cutchogue, NY. County Tax Map Parcel ID No. 1000-104-08-2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5. Project Proposed by this Application: To expand nonconforming marina from 35 boats to 53 boats. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Pursuant to Section 617.10(c) of the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southold Town Code, and other applicable statutes, the Board of Appeals as lead agency and in accordance with a previous declaration by this board clas- sifying this project as an Unlisted Action and determining that same may have significant adverse effects upon the environment, hereby determines that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will be prepared in accordance with Section 617.8 and resolution unanimously adopted by this board on February 11, 1984 and January 10, 1984 [copies of which are attached and made a part of this declaration and describing the possible significant environmental effects identified and stating the reasons support- ing this determination]. Lead Agency and Person to be Contacted for Further Information: Southold Town Board of Appeals, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, (516) 765-1809 [or 1802], Attention: Linda Kowalski, Secretary and Clerk of the Board. The LEAF has been circulated and no objections have been received within the 15-day commenting period from other departments/agencies; however, there is public controversy concerning this proposed project. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may have a different application since the same has not been integrated to be within the purview of the Board of Appeals~at this point in time. Dated: February 11, 1984. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN Southold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOENRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, .IR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT .I. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Appeal No. NOTICE OF DECLARATION PURSUANT TO N.Y.S. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT 3201 Application of: NOtAMAN C. BOOS Location of Subject Property: 8000 Skunk Lane (Bay Avenue), Cutchogue. County Tax Map Parcel District 1000, Section 104, Block 08, Lot 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5. Project Proposed: To expand marina dockage facilities for 18 boats. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Pursuant to Section 617.7 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environ- mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southo!d Town Code, and in order to commence the processing of the SEQRA procedures, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold at this time declares itself lead agency in this proposed project and hereby classifies the same as an Unlisted Action which may have a significant adverse effect upon the environ- ment for the following reasons: 1. Information has not been submitted indicating the type of sewage systems available, if any, for those boats having sleeping, kitchen, or other facilities, which may cause pollution into the waterway; 2. Information has not been available indicating the type of maneuvering for those boats to be navigating to and from each docking facility, which may disturb the wetlands area along the edge of this subject area. It is hereby requested that the applicant and/or his agent furnish our department with a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject Z.B.A. application. Dated: January 10, 1984. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS - GERARD p. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRM3tN For additional information, please contact: Linda Kowalski, Secretary and Clerk for the Board of Appeals at 765-1809 (or 1802). APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SDUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 785-1809 NOTICE OF POSITIVE DECLARATION Appeal No. 3203. Application of: NORMAN C. BOOS Location of Property: South Side Bay Avenue, Cutchogue, NY. County Tax Map Parcel ID No. 1000-104-08-2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5. Project Proposed by this Application: To expand nonconforming marina from 35 boats to 53 boats. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Pursuant to Section 617.10(c) of the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southold Town Code, and other applicable statutes, the Board of Appeals as lead agency and in accordance with a previous declaration by this board clas- sifying this project as an Unlisted Action and determining that same may have significant adverse effects upon the environment, hereby determines that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will be prepared in accordance with Section 617.8 and resolution unanimously adopted by this board on February 11, 1984 and January 10, 1984 [copies of which are attached and made a part of this declaration and describing the possible significant environmental effects identified and stating the reasons support- ing this determination]. Lead Agency and Person to be Contacted for Further Information: Southold Town Board of Appeals, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, (516) 765-1809 [or 1802], Attention: Linda Kowalski, Secretary and Clerk of the Board. The LEAF has been circulated and no objections have been received within the 15-day commenting period from other departments/agencies; however, there is public controversy concerning this proposed project. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may have a different application since the same has not been integrated to be within the purview of the Board of Appeals.at this point in time. Dated: February 11, 1984. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN RrlAD- r~TATE RI3AD 25 SrlUTH~3LD, L.I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Appeal No. NOTICE OF DECLARATION PURSUANT TO N.Y.S. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT 3201 Application of: NORMAN C. BOOS Location of Subject Property: 8000 Skunk Lane (Bay Avenue), Cutchogue. County Tax Map Parcel District 1000, Section 104,Block 08, Lot 2.1, 2.4, Project Proposed: To expand marina dockage facilities for 18 boats. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Pursuant to Section 617.7 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environ- mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the S0utho!d Town Code, and in order to commence the processing of the SEQRA procedures, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold at this time declares itself lead agency in this proposed project and hereby classifies the same as an unlisted Action which may have a significant adverse effect upon the environ- ment for the following reasons: 1. Information has not been submitted indicating the type of sewage systems available, if any, for those boats having sleeping, kitchen, or other facilities, which may cause pollution into the waterway; 2.3~ 2. Information has not been available indicating the type of maneuvering for those boats to be navigating to and from each docking facility, which may disturb the wetlands area along the edge of this subject area. It is hereby requested that the applicant and/or his agent furnish our department with a completed Long Environmental ASsessment Form. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject Z.B.A. application. Dated: January 10, 1984. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS - GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN For additional information, please contact: Linda Kowalski, Secretary and Clerk for the Board of Appeals at 765-1809 (or 1802). Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 5OUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. '119'71 TELEPHONE (5t6) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAtRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI February 14, 1984 Mr. Norman C. Boos One Cedar Street Massapequa, NY 11758 Re: Appeal No. 3203 Variance for Expansion of Marina Dear Mr. Boos: At a Special Meeting of the Board of Appeals held on February 11, 1984, it was the unanimous agreement of the members to request a Draft Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Section 617.8 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act which shall contain at least the following: (1) a concise description of the proposed project, its purpose and need; (2) a concise description of the environmental setting of the adjacent areas, sufficient to understand the possible effects of the proposed project; (3) a statement of the important environmental impacts of the proposed project, including short-term and long-term effects and typical associated environmental effects, i.e.: [a] alteration of the adjacent wetlands area, such as widening of the channel if needed at present or in the future; [b] changes and effects of the adjacent wetlands area due to wave action from navigation; [c] pollutants-sewage being discharged due to increased navigation; Page 2 - February 1984 To: Mr. Norman C. Boos Re: Appeal No. 3203 - SEQRA Variance for Expansion of Marina (4) an identification and brief discussion of environmental effects which cannot be avoided, if the proposed project is implemented; (5) a description and evaluation of reasonable alternatives, including no-action alternative; (6) an ~dentification of any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources which would be associated with the proposed action should it be implemented; (7) a description of mitigation measures to minimize the environmental impacts on: Ia] alteration of the adjacent wetlands area, including erosion, due to increased navigation and maneuvering of vessels; lb] sewage pollution; [c] other pollutants from navigation, etc. (8) a description of any growth-inducing aspects of the proposed project; (9) a list of any underlying studies, reports, expert testi- mony and other information obtained and considered in preparing this statement [together with copies of same for reference]. Upon receipt of the Environmental Impact Statement, we are required to provide for a 30-day commenting period and then to proceed with Section 617.10 of the SEQRA provisions. For your reference we are enclosing photocopies pertaining to other material to be included in this statement. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN Enclosures By Linda F. Kowalski cc: Southold Town Board BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 January 27, 1984 TELEPHONE {516) 765-1892 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Goehringer: I would like to advise your Board that the Trustees jurisdiction lies over all lands under water within the Town of Southold. We are authorized to issue permits for the placing of docks or other objects in or on any Town Waters provided that the same does not impede or interfere with navigation or the public use of said water or land. Therefore, in regard to the application of Mr. Norman C. Boos, the Trustees only have authority over the docks applied for and to insure that same does not interfere with navigation. This application, which is before the Board of Trustees, has been tabled, at the present time. Very truly yours,  rustees_ President HS/ip Southold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, .JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT .J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Trustees DATE: January 25, 1984 SUBJECT: Appeal No. 3201 , Norman C. Pending SEQRA Review Proposal to Expand Marina Boos Transmitted herewith for your records is a copy of the Long Environmental Assessment Form recently received by our office as lead agency in the above matter. Comments may be received by our office on or before February 9, 1984. A lack of response will be interpreted to mean that your department has no objection. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Enclosures Southold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI January 25, 1984 Mr. David DeRidder, Associate Environmental Analyst N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation S.U.N.Y. Stony Brook, NY 11793 Re: Permit No. 10-83-1610 Appeal No. 3201 - Norman C. Boos Expansion of Marina Dear Mr. DeRidder: At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held January 25, 1984, it was determined to coordinate review of the subject application pursuant to Section 617.7 of the SEQRA law. Transmitted herewith for your review are copies of the Long Environmental Assessment Form together with file documents con- cerning the variance for expansion of the marina. Comments may be received by our office on or before February 9, 1984. A lack of response will be interpreted to mean that your agency has no objection. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN Enclosures By Linda Kowalski cc: Building Department Southold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARO MEMBERS GERARD P, GOEHRINGER. CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Trustees DATE: January 25, 1984 SUBJECT: Appeal No. 3201 - Norman C. Boos Pending SEQRA Review Proposal to Expand Marina Transmitted herewith for your records is a copy of the Long Environmental Assessment Form recently received by our office as lead agency in the above matter. Comments may be received by our office on or before February 9, 1984. A lack of response will be interpreted to mean that your department has no objection. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Enclosures Est. 1850 Jan. 16, 1984 BAY AVENUE (Skunk Lane), CUTCHOGUE, g I., N. Y. 11935 Secluded Dockage with Electricity Southold Zoning Board Town Itall Main Rd. - S.R. 25 Southold, NY 1197] Attn: Mr. Gerard P. of Appeals doehringer? Chairman Days: 433-0010 Evenings: 541-4604 Mailing Address: Norman C. Boos I Cedar SL, Massapequa, N. Y. 11758 Dear Mr. Goehringer: In accordance with your letter dated January il 1984, enc].osed please find completed Long Environment Assessment form. I've heard rumor that a petition against this action with heavily ex- aggerated claims is being or has been sent you. Said petition assert- ing that we have (1) live on board people in the marina with resulting cooking and human pollution, (2) that boats are oversize and (3) that traffic creates a problem, I would like to document for tile board that these claims are invalid: (1) Live on board: With the exception of A. Zimmer (my wife's brother) patrons of tile marina live within a short distance of the marina. They walk and bike in addition to driving to the premises. They certainly do not live on board, nor is it honestly feasible for them to come aboard to cook, home is much more convenient. On occasion my brother-in-law does stay overnight at tile marina during which time he uses our personal dockside facilities. It has been noted on both 1983 and 1984 contracts that live on board is not permitted (see enclosed). As to my own boat, I do live on board during weekends and I utilize the toilet facilities in the storage building as purchased (also enclosed). I have not made these facilities available to anyone other then my in-laws but if the board wishes me to do so I certainly will readily comply I supply and maintain refuse cans for those in need. (2) Boats are oversize: Our boats range in size from a 13' boat to two boats that are 25' and one boa 27'. The twenty-seven is owned by Mr. & Mrs. R. Wacker, members in good standing in the community, who traded up from a 21 footer to the present size. They have been patrons of tile marina prior to and during the entire time that we have been owners. In view of the fact that they are such good people, and they conform to the rules of the marina, we could not tell them they must leave be~auae they are now oversize. (3) Parking: The enclosed photo (a) showing marina during our first }'age 1 of 2 - Continued WE ARE NOT TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER, THEFT, FIRE, ACCIDENTS OR OTHER CONTINGENCIES BEYOND OUR CONTROL. (2) year of ownership clearly indicates parking to be adjacent to the road. There was no way for any patron to leave the marina without having to back onto Skunk Lane, dangerous in view of people sometimes speeding around tile bend in the road. Since ownership, parking has been taken off tile road (photos b & c) by means of blocking cars from just pulling in and out. This was accomplished by placing the pilings and hawser lines as noted (photo b) and the telephone pole automobile stops as in photo a have been moved much closer to the white 4 x 4 posts creating a good size parking area (photo c). Parking in tile area of my home .has been landscaped, in a year or so no auto in that portion of tile marina will be seen from either Skunk Lane or Nassau Point Causeway. These photos indicate the entire marina basin. The platform of photo d is 20' overall enabling you to compare size of boats down the line. Photo c shows boats on the road side as well as tile east side. You can see from these photos that the boats are day boats, good for a leisurely outing, fishing or water skiing. They are not what would be called live on board type boats. To tie up a few loose ends. There is simultaneously community need as well as financial requirement for the expansion. The cost of operation far exceeds the revenue. I stated at the Trustees hearing that I will not again ask to increase the facilities if this request is passed and that is true. My home is almost ready to move into, I wish to do so. I as well as my neighbors wish to enjoy the quietude of the area and do not intend to make this into a large commercial enterprise. As you are aware, I am requesting an increase of eighteen additional boats, approximately 18' or less over the covenant set forth by tile Board of Appeals several weeks prior to the sale of the marina (covenant dated 6/1/78, deed delivered 8/23/78)' On May 17th 1978, to establish these guidelines, the former owner (Angelo Petrucci) in a letter to the Board of Applals stated he could accomodate with ease 40 to 45 boats, but for his purposes chose 35 (letter enclosed). There is ample room for this proposed addition. Cordially, enc. Addendum: At the Trustees meeting it was mentioned that at times people have exceeded the 5~II rule which would result in erosion of the marsh and wetland area. On occasion this has happened in the channel and we let the few who have done so be aware that it is against the law and would make them subject to expulsion from the marina. NO ONE has ever sped in the area of any docked boats however, and this addition would have the effect of protecting rather then destroying this vital area. People do slow down in the area of boats. cc: Bldg. Dept. Town Trustees Planning Board Supervisor F. J. Murphy  O~fN OF SOUTHOLD EhViRO:N~W~ENTAL ASSESS_~&ESIT - PART PRO./ECT I ~7F OR/4AT IO.N, any additicna[ info,alien ~ou believe will be need~ to c~ple[e EART~ Z an~ 3. ~t ,s exF~ tha~ cc~}'~ticn of ~e ~will be da~de~ on tnfo~a~ion ~enc]y avaJlabJe andwi]] not involve ne~ studies, resea~h or investigation. If info.scion ?equi~ng such eaditionat work is-una,,ai~b)e, so (ndicat~ ~nd specify each tnst~nce. Bro9 4w~t er_~ o~ SO00 Skunk Lane Cutehogue, NY 11935 Norman C. Boos 1 Cedar' St. Massapequa, NI~ 11758 flnatlng dn~k with nine small boats. Construct 175 Lineal foot of A. (PLEASE CO:!PLET~ EACH qUEStiOn( - indica:~ :(.A. if nor a~lica~le) -. I. uen_._l Cqarac:er of t~e land: ~enerail7 unifor-~, slope x ~enerzil¥ ,,~neven and rolling or irm~ular · Agriculture acre~qe af ~jec: a~a: N.___. Aac~sJ Urban , :ndustri:al , Co,.c~,.er~ial x. ,,, Suour~Jan . P. urzl , Fores: , Otaer Marina No physical change to land or wa~er, Reads. ~uildi~ ,~. t~hac ;~or_.cmn_n~ · ,'. sail ..79e',s) an As,~roxi~ate percent-~c.e of proposed projec~ site with slopes: O-lO~. %; lO-1S: '~; 1,5~ or ~jec= contiguous to, or contain a building or site listed on the NatiOnal Register o~'~istoric Yes ~ ~h~t is the depth to the water table? ~. A fee~ hunting or fishing oppo~unities presently exist in the project areal ,Yes C~es project site contain any species of plan~ or animal life that ts identified as threatened .......... d - Yes X ~(o, acceding to Identify each species ll. Are °~= ~..re an)' un[q'.'e or unusual land for~s on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological fore-,orions - Yes x~No..(Oascribe : 12. Is ~he project site presently used by the con~..unity ov neighborhood as an open space or rec~ation -.' 13. C~es ~he present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important t~.the c~unlty? ~- 14. St.-~._,ms within or c.~ntiguous to project area: ~one a. N~..-e of stree~ and name e? river to which it is tributary 15. Likes, Pon~, ~etland areas within or contiguous to project a~ea: _ a. tta=e Broadwater Cove ; b. Size {in acres) 16. 'xhat is ~he d:~inent l~nJ use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). .' Single fainily residential 1 1½ story FP, OJ ECT DESCRIPTI0:( 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) . a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project., sponsor appro~ ~-~- ~cres. b. Project acreage developed: NA acres initially; ,. acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to re~ain undeveloped NA d. Length of project, in miles: NA .{if appro0riate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age ; developed acreage ,,- NA · f. II~.-~er o? off-st~t perking spaces existing ~ 43 ; proposed fi~, - vehicular trips generated per hour ,two (upon completion of project) If residential: ,~(~.~ber and type of housing units: 1 existing 0ne'Fanily Two Fe~ily Multiple Family Condominium build~ng 'squa~ foot- Initial 1 Ultimate 1 If: Co.~-ercial Orientation Neighborhood-el ?y-Regional Non-oon~orming marina neighborhood Estimated Employment Industrial J. Total height of tallest proposed structure NA fee t. 3o 9. lO. ll. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. .Haw'huch nature) material (i earth, etc.) will be re~oved from site - NOne tmns cubic yards. "~ many acres of vegetation {trees, shrubs, cround covers) will be removed from site None acres. · b~ removed by this will any ma.ur_ forest (over)00 years old) or other locally-~moortant vegetation project? Yes x Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? Yes ' No ~f single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1 months, (including demolition). If multi-phased '~" proj.c,, a. Total n~ber of ~hases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ..month year (including demolition) c.' Approximate completion date final phase ~nth year. - d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? . Yes .~No ... Will blasting occur during constroction? ...yes ~ No N~ber of jobs generated: du~ng constr~ction Non~ after project is complet~ Nn~e · . Nut, er of jobs eliminated by this project No~ ~ill project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes x ~o. If yes, explain: a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes x____._No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) -- ..' c. If surface disposal na~e of stream into which effluent will be discha~ed -- Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, stremms, bays or other surface wa{arrays be increased or decreased by ~ro~osal? Yes X No. .- ' '' Is projec: or any portion of project located in .h. 100 year ~ood plain? Yes No a. Ones project involve disposal of solid waste? ~es X,Ne b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? yes _ No ; location c. If yes, give nome: d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~ Yes No Will project use herbicides or pesticides? .._..__Yes x Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? _ Yes x ~o Will project preduce operating noise ~xceeding the local ambience no)sa levels? Yes x No Will project ~esul~ in an increase in ener~' use? _ yes x.~o- If yes, indicate type(s) 20. 21. 22. If water supply is from wells indicate pumping c~pacity ~A To,al anticipated water usage per day NA ~als/day- Zoning: a. What is dominant'zoning classification of site? b. Current specific zoning classification of site c.. Is proposed use consis=ent with 2resent zoning? d. If no, indicate desired 2oning gals/minute. Ir)~i d ~nisi ~l-A~ri cultural Non-oonformin~ marina Yes 25. a. is any Federal permit required? X Yes No b. Bees project involve State or Federal funding or financing? __ c. Lo'al and Regional approvals: Approval Required (ies, ~to) (Type) Yes × ' RD Submittal Approval (Date) (Date) City, ?c'~n, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning 8oard City, T:wn, Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other local agencies Other r~gional agencies St.~t~ Agencies Federal A~encies I.,.~.~ .,~,,,',L C, ST~,ILS .. ' -' Air-'ch any additional infarction as n'~y be needed to clarify your project. If ~h~re are or may be any adve~e impacts associzted with the' p~posal, please discuss Such impacts and the measures which can be ~k~n ~o ~.i~ig~e or ~void~ TITLE: (Iwn pr TO~'~ OF SOUTHOLD ENViRONblENTAL ASSESSbiE~NT PART II PROJECT I~.~PACT$ AND THEIR MAGNITUDE General ~nforrJtion (Read Carefully) - in cam)feting the foF-m the roviewer should be guide~ ~? the question: Have my decisions and determinations been r~son~hle? The reviewer is hoc expected :o be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying :nat am effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily si~niflcant. Any large effec= must be evaluated in P~T 3 to determine s~gnificance. ~y.identifying an e~Fec: )~ col~n Z simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Examnles provided are to assist the reviewer by s~owing types of effects and wherever possible the threshol of magn~cuc~ thac ~ould trigger a ~sponse in col~-m Z. The ex~:ples are generally applicable throughout the Scale end for most situations. But, for any soeciFio project or si~e other examples and/or lower thresholds ~y be ~Ore appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each natality, yell very. ~erefore, the examples have been offered es'guidance They ~o not constitute an exhaustive list of impact3 and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per q~estion does not indicate the importance of each question. -- I)(ST~UCTI0~IS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the lS questions in PART 2. Answer ~es if there will be an~ effect. b. ~avbe answers should be considered as Yes answers. ~ c. If answering Yes to a cuestion then check the a~m~eriate box (colur~ 1 'or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold ~uals or exceeds any example provided, check ¢olum,n 2. If impac~ will occur but threshold is lower than exa~oie, check col~n 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the im~ac: ~?~.consider the i,?,9, act as potentially large and proceed to PAR~ 3. ' e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less.t~an large m2gnitode, place a Yes in coloron 3. A ~lo response i~dicates that such a reduction is not possible. t. Z. IMPACT O)i LA~¢Q CF.A.,..~ TO WILL THERE BE AN BE?CT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL .... '"- PROJECT SITE? Examoles that l~ould Apply to Column 2 NO YES Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 1OO foot of len§~h), or where the general slopes in :he project area exceed Construction on Land where- the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Constructicn of oared aarking area for l,SOg or mo~ vehicles. ~nstruccion on land ~here bedrock is exposed cr ~sner~lly within 3 Feet of existing ground surd?ace. Construction chat will continue for more Chon 1 year or involve tons of natural .'taterial {i.e. rock or soil) ~er year. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. ;YALL TO POTE?iTIAL CA,'t IHPACT BE HOD EP. ATE LARGE REDUC2D BY I,.P~C, [t-!PACT PROJECT CHANGE -5- Construe:ion in a designated floodway. NO YES .... TFE.-'IE ~E AX EFFECT TO ANY U;IIqUE OR U:;USUAL L~.N,9 FOPJ-IS/~'~'~ FCU:~CH T~E SITE? (i.~. cliffs, dunes, ~ologicai._ forma- tions ..... ) Specific land D'P:CT 0~1 ~ATER NO YES ,iLL P~OJ~C~ ~FFEC~ ANY ,Al-ER BODY DESi~-'~ATEO AS .. ........ ~ ~ PROTECTED? (Under Articles lO. 24, 25 of the Envir- e,..._n._I CsnservaCi~n Law, E.C.L.) _x_..l_s that ~ouId A~ply to ColuFr,~ ~ Ored~in~ rote th~n 100 cubicyarda of ~aterial from Ccnstructlcn in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. O~her impac:s: .............. ~ =- EXISTING OR ,,=.d NO YE-~ gOCf OF UA~:~? ..................................... Ex~o!es .... ~ould ~uPlY ~ Column 2 A 1C: increase or dec~ase in the su~ace area of any body Construction oF a body of ~lBt~ th~ exceeds lO acres o~ impacts: ~(u YES Examoles that '.,iould Apply to Colu~'~ 2 '' Project will require a discharge pennit. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serue proposed project. P~ject ~equires water suoply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacitx. Ccnst~Jction or accretion causing any contamination of a public water supply system. Project will adversely 'affect ~undwacer. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site Co facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Project ~ill likely cause siltation or other discha~e - (n~ an exlstino body of ~eter to the extent that there ~'OOEP~ATE I,IP.~.T - L~RC, E REDUcCD BY P~OJE~T.I I,~'PAr-T 6:~ VISUAL RESGURCE .. 10.. :h'LL TH£ Po,]JECT iFFECT V£E!!S, V~STAS ~n inc~:a~ble v~sual affect caus~ by ~he ~ntr~uction A ~r:ject easHy v~s~ble, no~ easily oDvigu$~ different f~ others a~und 11, 12. Project ;Hll result in the elimination or major Other IY~.:CT ell HISTORIC ;;.~A~TO POTENTIAL CA;; IHPACT ,'PS ,00cPATE LARGE REDUCED BY MP~CT I~;PACT PROJECT CHA~;O E ) -. {S NO YES :,~iLL PoO~ECT [I'?ACT A;;Y SITE OR STRUC~JRE OF HISTORIC, NO K~_-nIS~2[C fir ?~L.:'.,,I C,~[CA~ IMPORTANCE? · .............. P~ject ~ccurinq ~hollz or partially within or contiguous ~o any f~cility or site listed on the ~iational R~gister of. historic places. ?my impact to an ~rsheelogical site or fossil bed located within the projec: site. Ot~er impacts: I~:DACT O~l OPEN SPACE & RECRm_ATIO~[ " Examples that t/ould Apply to ¢o'lumm 2 1-ne perm~'nen~ foreclosure of · future recr~-~-tiona1 opport, unity. A major reduction of ~n open space important to the cD~unit~'. Other impact:: IHp~CT rill ;~NSrO~T~T.OI ,lI_~ ~HSSE S'fS7~,IS? ............................................... Ex,moles that ~ou!d Apply to Column Alteration of present p6ttar~s of m~vemen: of people -" and/or Projeot will result in severe traffic problems. SKALL TO POTENTIAL CAN I~OERATE ~RG, E REDUCED IMPACT II, PACT pp, n~ j ECT 'CHA;IC-'E ) $ ) -'S ~¢TU Ph?jECT ALTER .9?.qIHAGE FLSH, PAT,~2:IS OR SU~F.C: UATER P~ject would i~de flood water ~ows. P~jec: is likely :o cause ~ubsCan~ial erosion. P~ject is inco~atible with existing drainaee Other impacts: -' ~ YES Ex~D1es ~h~ Uculd A~ply ~o Colu~ 2 P~jec% will induce 1,SOO or mo~ vehicle trips in any given hGur. P~ject will result in the ~ncinera%ion of mo~ than t ton of ~fuse per hour. P~.ec~ emission ra:e of all cont~inants will exceed lbs. per hour or e heat sourc~ producing mor~ :ban millicn STU's per hour. Other . D~ YES HILL PROJECT AFFECT ~Y THh~TEDI~ OR ~IDAN~E~ SPEC[ESY Examples the: ~.~culd ADpIs to Col~ ~ Reduction of on~ or ~ species listed on the ?:~ York or Federal lis:. using ~e site. over or near site fcund on ~he site. Re.vel ef any portion of a critical or,~ignificant wild- life hab~ Application of Pesticide or he~icide over r~ than Other impacts: Ex~mole thaC ~ould Apply to Column 2 Projec: ¥~ould ~ubsCan~ially interfera with any or migratory fish or wildlife s2ec!es. Project racu~res ~,,e re~o,/a] of more than 10 .... ' Of ~ mature forest (mter ~00 years in age) or otne-l:cally ~IiLL PRJJECT AFFECT THE CC;S-iUN[TIES SOURCES OF PJEL ~2 NO' YEi ~N~R~Y $U??LY? .................................. £×a~Ies that ~uld ~?~ to Colum, n ~ Prmject causing greater than S: increase in any fo~ of enero_y used in municipality. Prmjec: requiring :he creation or extension of an energy transmission or su2ol¥ system to serve more then 50 single or ~.~o famiIs residences. Other impacts: IMPACT O~l or ~ECTRI~L DIS,~..~,tC_AS A RESULT OF THIS ~xameles that I~¢uid Apply to CoILmm 2 B~asting within 1,~OO Feat of a hospital, school ~r ether sensitive facility. Odo~ will occur ~uCinely [~re then one hour per day). P~ject will o~duce operating noise exceedin~ the local ambient noise levels far noise outside of strictures. P~Ject will re~ve natural barriers that would acc zs a 16. Other impacts: Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of h~zardous substances {i.e. oil, p~sticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be a ch~nic low level discharge or emission. Project that will r~sult in the burial of "hazard=us wastes" (i.e. toxic. $oisonous, highly reactive, redioacmiYe, irritating, infecc~eus, etc., including wastes that ere solid, s~i-solld. liquid or contain gases.) Storace Facilities for cna million or more gallons :f liquified natural gas or ot~er lleuids. M.A POTclTL-.L C~, !:~.PACT,C~· ( ~ OEFL~.TE LAP. GE REDUCED BY IMPACT [,~:PACT PROJECT CHA~':G E ~ILL PaOJ'--CT AFFECT T~,E CS~RAC-ER nF THE EXISTI~G ~|0 YES '~,,_ copulation of the C~ty, Town or Village in which T~e municipal budgets f~r capital expenditures or oper~- ,n.r_.se by more than 5~ ocr year as a resuJC of this p~jecC. '~iiI involve any ..... Facility of a non-agricultural use in en ~gr~cuJt:r~1 ~istrict or remove prime agricoltural ~e '- * will replace or eliminate existing facilities, s~Jc~ur~s or ~reas O~ hist:rio impotence to the gevelo~menk will Jndgc~ en in~ux of 8 pa~icular ege g~up wfth special noeCs. F~je~: will :e~ ~n im:o~nt pr~¢~dent for future ~rojec: ~ill reI~cate 15 or more employees in one or 12. NO ' YES I~:c:~. ?U3LIC CO;tTRg'/ERSY CONC=,q,I.JG T'HE PROJECT? .... Ex~!~s chat ~'ould A~ply to Colu~ 2 E~ther ¢overn~ent or c~tlzens of adjacent co.unities have ex~res~d opposition or r~ectBd the p~ject or have ODjections =o the p~ect f~m wi~in the co.unity. I IF A:IY ACTIO,~' [N PART E i$ iOE?i!,I,,F, IED ~S A,., J POTE~T!AL LARGE [~PACT OR IF YOU j 5 T DET c.~HI,,AT ~0 t PO,~TIO~;S OF EAF CO~IPL:~TED FOR T?,IS PROJECT: PART I ~ PART Il-- PART 3__ U~¢n revim~ of the information recorded on this FAF (Parts 1, 2 an~ 3) and considorinq bath the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: A. The ~roject will resul~ in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significan: damage Co the environment. 8. Aishcuch the project cpuld have a significant effect on the env~man~, :here will nec be a significant effect in this case ~ec~use the mitigaCicn ?~asures dascribeo in PART 3 have been inc~uced as par: of the proposed ?eject. C. The ?oject will result in one er more major adverse impacts Signature of Preparer (if different from respons:ble officer) PREPARE A ~,'E~ATIVE OECI_qRATIOH PREPARE A NEC~TT.'IE OEC~P~,TIO,q 7RE?ARE FOSiTIVE DE'SLARATIO~I PROCEED '4I Signature of Responsible Official ~n L Agency Pi-ins or tyge name of responslble offi TO~'~ OF SOUTHOLD EN~VIRON~ENTAL ASSESS~LENT - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPO~TANC~ OF' IMPACTS ~art 2 is ~r..a._d :F eno cr ~ore i~pact or effast is c.-nsidered to be potentially large. The !._-~ount of ~vritin~ nec-=ssar7 to answer Part 3 ~a'y .'e determined by answering Che question: In briefly cc~),.,tin~ C~.e insCructiens balcw hava I placed in t~is record sufficient infor~ation to indicate the Cc=plate the Follcwing for each i=p~.ct or effect identified in 'Column ~ of Part 1. 2. None ~rieFly dascri~.e t%e impact. Cescr(~e {if eppllcable) how the impact might be mitigated er reduced to a less than iar~e impact by a pro- jecs Eased on the info~eticn eveileble~ decide if tt is reasonable to conclude that ~his impact is the ~inici~ality (city, town or village) in ~nicn the project is located. To answer the cuestion of impo~nce, considar: ~s probabilicy of the i~act or effect occurring '" The duration of ~ i~act or effect I~s ir~varsibil(ty, including pe~enently loss r~sources or values ~het~er the impact or effect can be ccnt~lled The regicne) consequence of the impact or effect ' ' Its potential divergence from local needs and seals Whether knc~n objections to the p~ject aFoly ~o t~is impact or ~ffect. An action is considered to be significant if: One (or zeta) ims~ot is deter-,.ined to both ia~e and its (their) consequence, based on the review PART !ZI S~A:~.,.c. ha (C.n~]n.. cn ~ttac~*ents, as needed) Est, 1950 Days: 433-8010 BvenlnEs= 541-4094 BAY AVENUE (Skunk Lane), CUTCHOGUE, L. I., N. Y. 11935 Secluded Docka[e with Electricity MailinE Address: Norman C. Boos ~. Cedar St~, Massapequa, N, Y, ~.~.758 WE ARE NOT TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER, THEFT, FIRE, ACCIDENTS or OTHER CONTINGENCIES BEYOND ODR CONTROL. Est. 1950 Days: 433-0010 Evenings: 5414604 BAY AVENUE (Skunk LanB), CUTCHOGUE, L. h, N. Y. 11935 Secluded Dockage with Electricity Mailing Address: Norman C. Boos ! Cedar St., Massapequa, N. Y. 11758 WE ARE NOT TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER, THEFT, FIRE, ACCIDENTS OR OTHER COiX!TINGENCIES BEYOND OUR CONTROL. ; _:_:_-'~n %he Lou%h. ~ide of my prb~er~y on ~ay ,~venue or ~hun~ Lane OuZchb~ae~,2~ To t~e beat or my ~le~e X ~ve ~ou the ~ollowln~ ~nfo~at~on.'--~ '::'= ~:.~ _.iX bou~t my property Xn 19~7 from ~. ~ph Uterli~ of.. Cutc~o~e. :~ j . ~ ~ ~"%~1~ ~o~ ~ ~e~v~. ~l~ ~e~ ~ ~uo~-mo'~' . .'-.' my prepay_ for ~e. ~rpaae cf a ~ :~-: ~_~' -' .~ ' '~_):~T'~.~ ' :J" '.~ of th~ z~JC~ttee',o~2st2~: of the ' follow~. ~'[ Ha~oZd: Re~;"[~d" ~oh--.. ~; l~pecte2 ~nd appr~'[the ~'~-.-' ~'~'~n~"of:'~' t~e'off me.ice' ,~ ~2 ~cffat~er~ ~en ~ no~: ~e {~-Xn~~o .Z~m m~e ~op~y 2 .w~ld like to poinZ ~t .~d have.the .~f lnclu~:~e B~t' ~sin-~lness ~ the s~e Panel. of Prepe~y. ~tween SXxteen o~ Twenty F~ Fee%. ' ' However fo~ my ~p,se I choose ~o ~; T~y Two %o ~lr%y 51ve Hopl~ thls re~e will meet wl~ y~zr approval,~d I ~ll~ ~-~elve a ~a~emen~ from yo~ Bo~d. T~ You very ~ch. ~our~ f~ly ~~ ~I~OL' .iww: L e&'s Cove C ode ~1~ Mai~Ilng AclareSs: Norman u. i~oos I C~a~ar St Ha~,cqua i NY I175S BROADWATERS COV.E ~b\RINA Ew 541-4(;O,I ~',~ na 734-6323 Contract - Summer Dockage 19~3 length of Boat I[~~ ltcgis.tration /; Width of Beam, . lloattName /I~'~ : F~ ~ ~0~ PER]OD OF tPR. ~,~ ~brou~h Nov. I ON LY Please circle which is applicable for your boat. Minimum to~ 19'.- $~40.00 22' - $370.00 17' - 320.00 20' - 350.00 23'- 380.00 18' - 330.00 21' - 360.00 24' - 390.00 ~ALANCE PLEASE NOTE: full.is received I hereby acknowledge that the aforementioned fee is to be paid in the following manner: DEPOSIT: - Minimum 9f 25~ to be received at Broadwaters Cove Marina by Feb. 15, 1983. · - To be paid in full and received at Broadwaters Cove Marina by 4~15/83. Reservations cannot be held unless payment in by 4/1/83. I clearly understand that the said fee is for a rental charge only and that Broadwaters Cove~ar~na TM ' is NOT RESPONSIBLE for arty damage caused by weather, fire, theft, accident or any contingency beyond our control. I also agree.to abide by the following rules and regulations: NO speed in excess of 5 ~WH in marina or channel, no loitering, unattended children, swimming, crabbing or fishing in marina. No live on board. Any infringement of the above rules may lead to expulsion from the marina. PLEASE NOTE FURTHER: Dockage after November 1,.by special permission. only. Signatur~ ~ ,~kflowl Cd,emend. "e are n(~be ~onsible for inclement weather',, lhe['t, live, aec. idvnts or other contingencies beyond our control. .Est. 1950 Days: 433-0010 Evenings: 541-4604 Marina 734-6323 raadwat rs ari a BAY AVENUE (Skunk Lane), CUTCHOGUE, L. I., N. Y. 11935 Secluded Dockage with Electricity Mailing Address: Norman C. Boos Contract - Summer Dockage 1984 1 Cedar St., Massapequa, N. Y. 11758 Length of Boat '\-~' Registration # Width of Beam .%' Boat Name Owner Name & Address ~(b~k~.k ~-. ~-~%9-~?~.~ RENTAL FEE IS FOR-IERIOD OF APR. 1, ti~roug ~ . 1, ONLY Please circle which is applicable for your boat. Minimum t~ $~.0--~ 21' - $400.00 17' - 340.00 22' - 415.00 18' - 355.00 23' - 430.00 19' - 370.00 24' - 445.00 20~ - 385.00 For your convenience gas & oil a~ available. I hereby acknowledge that the aforementioned fee is to be paid in the following manner: DEPOSIT: - Minimum of 25% to be received at Broadwaters Cove Marina by Feb. 15, 1984. BALANCE: - To be paid in full and received at Broadwaters Cove Marina by 4/15/84. PLEASE NOTE: Reservations cannot be held unless payment in full is received by 4/15/84. I clearly understand that the said fee is for a rental charge only and that Broadwaters Cove Marina is NOT RESPONSIBLE for any damage caused by weather, fire, theft, accident or any contigency beyond our control. I also agree to abide by the following rules and regulations: NO speed in excess of 5MPH in ~RINA OR CttANNEL, no loitering, unattended children, swimming, NO LIVE ON BOARD. Any infringement of the above marina. PLEASE NOTE FURTHER: Dockage ONLY. crabbing or fishing in marina. rules may lead to expulsion from the after November 1, BY SPECIAL ;ERMISSION " WE ARE NOT TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER, THEFT, FIRE, ACCIDENTS :- . '' OR OTHER CONTINGENCIES BEYOND OUR CONTROL. The Sale of this Property includes the following: Three hundred and seventy feet (370 ft.) on- Bay Avenue or Skunk Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 1. The Marina or Boat-Basin provides slips for dockage of 35 boats, up to 24 ft. 2. Electricity and Fresh Water. 3. A ramp to launch, take-out, service, or paint bottom of boats, etc. 4. A tool and utility concrete-block storage building with toilet. 5. The sale of gas and oil, consisting of a 575 gal. tank and electric-pump. Inspected and passed May 29, 2978 by Suffolk County No. P-00854-P00853. '6. Water front building-lot, (43,500 sq. ft.) for construction of a house and septic-system, no construction within (30 ft.) of line mean high-water. Passed and Approved November 4, 1974 by New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook, New York. Precast 900 gals. Septic tank, 5 shallow pools already installed, and inspected. Approval date November 3, 1974, Permit No. 450159, Health Service Reference No. 4-50-159. Bo Water Supply tested and approved Oct. 24, 1975, Lot-A-4S0-160 by H-2-M Corporation Water Analytical Service 500 Broad Hallow Water Road Melville, New York 11746 Real Estate Property Tax for 1977-$460.12 Liability Insurance for 3 year policy-S210.00 Est. 195D lgraadwaters ave arma BAY AVENUE (Skunk Lane), CUTCHOGUE, L. I., N. Y. 11935 Sec;uded Dockage with Electricity Jan. 13, 1984 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road - State Rd. 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer~ Chairman nays: 433-0010 Evenings: 5414604 Mailing Address: Norman C. Boo~ 1 Cedar St., Massapequa, N. Y. 11758 Dear Mr. Goehringer: With reference to your letter dated Jan. submit the following: 3, 1984, I respectfully (a) The maximum number of boats docked at the marina with tile present docking has been 37 boats plus my personal boat. I'd like to mention that my boat is for sale (Listed with McMichaels Yacht Sales in Sag llarbo~. Until my home is completed, target date early fall 1984, I must continue to live on it during the week- ends. (b) I've enclosed for your review our construction plan which indicates the length of walk to be 175' and width 20' 1-1/2" . (c) Site plan enclosed indicates that we can provide up to 62 parking spaces, however as stated in my letter dated July 14, 1982 (the same is true of the 1983 season) even during the hottest days with the heaviest traffic there has never been more than 20 cars parked at any one time. After proposed expansion, parking for 62 cars will frankly NEVER be necessary however the plan indicates that they are available. (d) As to width of channel, it is 50' wide at the narrowest portion The total projection of the proposed catwalk and fingers into the channel is approx 20~', our personal boat is 14'10" in width with a 3' spring line meaning that the boat we use projects into the channel roughly 18', resulting in a difference of only approx. 2~.'. (page 1 of 2, continued) WE ARE NOT TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER, THEFT, FIRE, ACCIDENTS OR OTHER CONTINGENCIES BEYOND OUR CONTROL, Page 2 of 2 The boats in the marina basin have no problem with respect to access or egress and a difference in the width of the channel of 2½' will not result in any less maneuverability. Sir, I would like to request that the tapes of the public hearing of the Board of Trustees held on the 13th of Decembeq 1983, be reviewed by the Board of Appeals for in,ut as to the function of the marina and the community need for additional dockage. Thanking you for your courtesy and cooperation with regard to this matter. Cordially, enc. l~arina ErSt. 1950 13'raa .water$ Cave 3tari Days: 4330010 Eesnlnss: 541-4604 BAY AVENUE (Skunk Lane), CUTCHOGUE, L. I., N. Y. 11935 Secluded Dockage with Electricity ; Mailing Address: Norman C. Boos 1 Cedar SL, Massapequa, N. Y. 11758 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road - State lid. 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Gerard P. Goehringer; Re: Chairman Dear Mr. Goehringer; County of Suffolk Dept. of Planning Norman C. Boos #2914 I~ accordance with your request dated June 16, 1982, en- closed please find sketch showing entire property, pro- posed division line and further indicating both the marina slips and parking allocated for same. (43 spaces) As of this date, the most lmrking we have had at the marina at any one time is 20 vehicles. Hoping this enclosure will meet with your requirements. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Cordially, ~orman C. Boos cc: Stephen L. Griffing Atty. enc. WE ARE NOT TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR iNCLEMENT WEATHER, THEFT, FIRE, ACCIDENTS OR OTHER CONTINGENCIES BEYOND OUR CONTROL. BROADlt2kTERS COVE ~RINA Norman C. Boos N~w Work proposed indicated in red ,5c,a£E .. /"= ~M' I PERMIT NO. NEW YO~JC ~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CON/~RVATIO~ 10-83-1610 PERM iTj",, ,/t,m, ., UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATIOI~I~ /1~' {"T.~ ,7_ , ARTICLE 24, (Ff~s~ater Wetla~s) ~ A[TIC~ 3~, {Constyuctiofl in FI~ Hazi~eas) 'ERMIT ISSUED TO Norman C. Boos ~DDRESS OF PERMI~EE One Cedar Street, Massapequa, NY 11758 ~CATIQN O~OJECT(Sectionofstrea~tJdal ~tland, dam, building) Northwest corner ot Broadwater Cove at the Broad- raters Cove Marina located on the south side of Bay Avenue, Cutchogue. !ESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ~onstruct approximately 175 linear feet of 3'6" wide floating catwalk with nine finger piers neasuring 3'6" X 16'6" long in accordance with the plans entitled "Broadwater Cove Marina" ,~repared by Norman C. Boos, received December 21, 1983. OMMUNiTY NAME (Cily, Town, Village) :utchosue °=ho d :bUNTY~uffolk [ FIA CO~MUNI-IY NO. ' [ DAM NO. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The permittee shall file Jn the office of the appropriate Regional rmit Administrator, a notice of intention to commence work at Jeasl 48 urs Jn advance of the lime of commencement and shall also notify him -mptly in writing of the completion of the work. 2. The permitted work shall be subject to inspection by an authorized ~resentative of the Deportment of Environmental Conservation who may fey the work suspended if the public interest so requires. 3. As a condition of the issuance of this permit, the applicant has ac* ~ted expressly, by the execution of the application, the full lesal fespon- ~Jlity for all damages, direct or Jndirect~ of whatever nature, snd by whom- ~r suffered, arising out of the p~oject described herein and has asreed to iemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and sts of every name and description resullinB lrom lhe said project. 4. Any material dredged in the prosecution of the work herein permitted all be removed evenly, without leaving larBe refuse piles, ridges across the d of the waterway or flood plain or deep holes that may have a tendency to .,se injury to navigable channels or to the hanks of the waterway. 5. Any material to be deposited or dumped under this permit, either in ~ waterway or on shore above high-water mark, shell be deposited or dumped the locality shown on the drawin$ hereto attached, and, if so prescribed .reon, within or behind a Rood and substantial bulkhead or bulkheads, such will prevent escape of the material into the waterway. 6. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the rk herein authorized. ~. That if future operations by the State of New York require an alteration the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cat,se, unreasonable :truction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows.or endanger health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or loss or destruction Ihe natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Depart- .~t to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused reby without expense Io the State; and if, upon the expiration or revocation this permit, the struclure, fill, excavation, or other medifJcation of the ~ercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners shall, hour expense to the State, and ~o such extent and in such time and manner the Department of EnWronment~l Conservation may require, remove all or · portion of the uncomp)eted structure or fill and restore to its Jormer ,:litton the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or ~..4 (~/75) 8. That the Stale of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the struclure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or riRht to compensation shall accruc from any such damage. 9. That if the display of lights and signals on any work hereby authorized is not otherwise provided for by law~ such lights and signals as may be pre- scribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be installed and maintained by and al the expense of lhe owner. 10. All work carried out under this permit shall be performed in accoro dance with established engineering practice and in a workmanlike manner. 11. If granted under Articles 24 or 25, the Department reserves the ~'ighl 1o reconsider this approval at any time and after duc notice and hearing to continue, rescind or modify this permit in such a manner as may he found 1o be just and equitable. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permif~ the modification of the wetland hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may mquire~ remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill end restore the site to its former condition. NO claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 12. This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others to perform the permitted work or as authorizing the impairment of any rights, title or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. 13. The permittee is r. espunsible for obtaining any other permits, ap- provals, lands, easements and rights-Of-way which may be required for this project. 14. If Branted under Article 36, this permit is granted solely on the basis of the requirements of Arlicle 36 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Part 500 of 6 NYCRR (Construction in Flood Plain Areas having Special Flood Hazards - Building Permits) and in no way signifies that the project will he free from flooding. 15. By acceptance of this permit the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the special conditions on the reverse side. (SEE REVERSE SIDE) S~(~IA~'.CONDITIONS 16. There is to be no dredging, filling or bulkheading associated with this project. 17. There is to be no disturbance to vegetation or topography along the existing shoreline. SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS A - J, p ERMIT ISSUE DATE Tanuary 12, 1984 JPERMITAD~INIST~ATOR /j I'/ ~./~ · IADDRESS Bldg. 40, SUNY--Room 219 _ . v~.~_.j Stony Brook, NY 11794 The following conditions shall apply if' checked- as applicable by the . Regional Permit Administrator: K. All dredging shall be conducted so as to leave a uniform bottom elevation free of mounds or holes. All spoil material shall be disposed of either in the Atlantic Ocean or at an approved U.S. Government Dumping Ground, as directed by the District Engineer, U.S, Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers. Any spoil material not intended for such water dis- posal shall be removed from the site and disposed of at an approved upland site, Allfill and'spoil material shall be suitably contained at the work site so as to prevent its eroding, leaching or otherwise entering intu-ad~acemt wetlands and waterways. N,..All peripheral rip-rap berm, cofferdams, rock revetments, .gabions, bulkheads, etc. shall be completed prior to placement of any fill material behind such structures. ~0.... AlL repairs' to existing structures shall be confined: to replacement of'--ex, sting etructur;1 ~l~ents with no change iwdenign, a~mension, o~ matert~l s, unless specl£ically authorized herein. X ~P.__The 'following Water Quality Certification shall'-apply'if:re~u/.red_ by one or more agencies of the United States'Government and if '"...._-.cb~r~=~ asapplicable by the Regional Permit In.accordancewith Section 401(a)(1) of the Clean. Water~mt--of'- ..... 1977 (PL 95-217) the New York State Department of Envi~ntal . .....Conservation herebycer~lfles that the subject proJec~ vroposal will not contravene effluent lfmi~ations or other l~mttation~'or, standards. ..... --Imaer-Sactions.301, 302, 303, 306 or 307 or the Act. January 12, 1984 10-83-1610 Daniel J.~/~rkin, P.E. legiomal. Permi~ .A~m~ ~ ~ stl'atcr~ .... ; .. · Division of Regulatory Affairs NYS Depa~i.-~ni~ d.l,,vlr~l ..... Stony Brook,.NY 11794 (516) 751-7900-' Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN RrlAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHrlLD. L.I.. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H, SAWlCKI January 11, 1984 Mr. Norman C. Boos One Cedar Street Massapequa, NY 11758 Re: Appeal No. 3201 Variance to Expand Marina Facilities Dear Mr. Boos: At a Special Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held last evening, January 10th, the board declared itself lead agency pursuant to the N.Y.S. Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Town Code, and classified your proposed project as an unlisted action which may have a significant adverse effect upon the environment for the reasons listed in the attached Declaration. Pursuant to the above, it is requested that a Long Environ- mental Assessment Form, which is attached, be completed by you and filed with our office as early as possible. Please don't hesitate to call our office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, Enclosures cc: Building Department Town Trustees Planning Board Supervisor F.J. Murphy GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Southold Town Board o£ Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (518) 785-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Appeal No. NOTICE OF DECLARATION PURSUANT TO N.Y.S. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT 3201 Application of: NORMAN C. BOOS Location of Subject Property: 8000 Skunk Lane (Bay Avenue), County Tax Map Parcel District 1000, Section 104,Block 08, Project PropOSed: To expand marina dockage facilities for 18 boats. Cutchogue. Lot 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Pursuant to Section 617.7 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environ- mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southo~d Town Code, and in order to commence the processing of the SEQRA procedures, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold at this time declares itself lead agency in this proposed project and hereby classifies the same as an Unlisted Action which may have a significant adverse effect upon the environ- ment for the following reasons: . 1. Information ~as not been submitted indicating the type of sewage systems available, if any, for those boats having sleeping, kitchen, or other facilities, which may cause pollution into the waterway; 2. Information has not been available indicating the type of maneuvering for those boats to be navigating to and from each docking facility, which may disturb the wetlands area along the edge of this subject area. It is hereby requested that the applicant and/or his agent furnish our department with a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject Z.B.A. application. Dated: January 10, 1984. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS - GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN For additional information, please contact: Linda Kowalski, Secretary and Clerk for the Board of Appeals at 765-1809 (or 1802). Southold Town Board o£ Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, .IR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI January 11, 1984 Mr. Norman C. Boos One Cedar Street Massapequa, NY 11758 Re: Appeal No. 3201 Variance to Expand Marina Facilities Dear Mr. Boos: At a Special Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held last evening, January 10th, the board declared itself lead agency pursuant to the N.Y.S. Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Town Code, and classified your proposed project as an unlisted action which may have a significant adverse effect upon the environment for the reasons listed in the attached Declaration. Pursuant to the above, it is requested that a Long Environ- mental Assessment Form, which is attached, be completed by you and filed with our office as early as possible. Please don't hesitate to call our office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, Enclosures cc: Building Department Town Trustees Planning Board Supervisor F.J. Murphy GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD ~TATE RnAD 25 SOUTHrnLD, L.I., N.Y, 1]971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-~809 APPEALSBOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE OOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Appeal No. Location of 3201 Subject Property: County Tax Map Parcel District 1000, Section 104,Block 08, Lot Project Proposed: To expand marina dockage facilities for 18 boats. NOTICE OF DECLARATION PURSUANT TO N.Y.S. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Application of: NORMAN C. BOOS 8000 Skunk Lane (Bay Avenue), Cutchogue. 2.1, 2.4, ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Pursuant to Section 617.7 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environ- mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southold Town Code, and in order to co~mence the processing of the SEQRA procedures, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold at this time declares itself lead agency in this proposed project and hereby classifies the same as an Unlisted Action which may have a significant adverse effect upon th~ environ- ment for the following reasons: 2.3, 1. Information has not been submitted indicating the type of sewage systems available, if any, for those boats having sleeping, kitchen, or other facilities, which may cause pollution into the waterway; 2. Information has not been available indicating the type of maneuvering for those boats to be navigating to and from each docking facility, which may disturb the wetlands area along the edge of this subject area. It is hereby requested that the applicant and/or his agent furnish our department with a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject Z.B.A. application. Dated: January 10, 1984. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS - GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN For additional information, please contact: Linda Kowalski, Secretary and Clerk for the Board of Appeals at 765-1809 (or 1802). S th Id To d £App 011 0 U~I! Ofll' 0 ~, MAIN ROAD' STATE ROAD 2 TELEPHONE {~16) 76~-18~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI January 3, 1984 Mr. and Mrs. Norman C. Boos One Cedar Street Massapequa, NY 11758 Re: Appeal No. 3201 Variance for Nine Additional Docks Dear Mr. and Mrs. Boos: At our Regular Meeting held December 28, 1983, the board members reviewed your recent application and the board requested the following information: (a) What is the maximum number of boats docked at the same time on the present docking? (b) What is the length of the proposed docks from the edge of the existing bulkhead? (c) Please provide a plan showing the proposed additional parking spaces (in addition to the 43 parking spaces required by the prior decision in Appeal No. 2914). (d) Please indicate on the plan the width of the channel's thoroughfare and its location for navigation. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours very truly, lk GERARD P. C~AIRMA~ GOEHRINGER Southold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI January 3, 1984 Mr. and Mrs. Norman C. One Cedar Street Massapequa, NY 11758 Boos Re: Appeal No. 3201 Variance for Nine Additional Docks Dear Mr. and Mrs. Boos: At our Regular Meeting held December 28, 1983, the board members reviewed your recent application and the board requested the following information: (a) What is the maximum number of boats docked at the same time on the present docking? (b) What is the length of the proposed docks from the edge of the existing bulkhead? (c) Please provide a plan showing the proposed additional parking spaces (in addition to the 43 parking spaces required by the prior decision in Appeal No. 2914). (d) Please indicate on the p~an the width of the channel's thoroughfare and its location for navigation. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours very truly, lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 December 15, 1983 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Victor Lessard Executive Administrator Building Department Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Victor: Attached hereto is the application of Norman C. Boos for a Trustee Permit. The Board of Trustees feel that they do not want to consider this application until it has passed through your department granting or denying his request. Very truly yours, Board of Town Trustees Paul Stoutenburgh President PS:ip Attachments cc: Mr. Boos ~ Mrs. Joan M. Langemyr / Br~vat er CoYe ALL~OCKS AND BULKHEADS MUST DISPLAY VISIBLE PERMIT NUMBERS ~[ain Road ~ ~ ~w APPLICATiO~¢ FOR FIXED and/or FLOkTI]~G DOCKS 1. Applicant's name =nd address: .... N~r~fl~_~,.~.~.9.~ .......... ~ ................... ~ ................................ Bus 349-0010 2. Contractor's name and address: ............... ~.~ ........................................................... [.k.._[~ ..... a. Briefly explain the purpose of this cgp~icctlcn: .fi~.~.E~&~...~.E~.~.~'~&}.~ ................. 4. After issuance of a Permit, ~eork mu== be comp!e=ed 'wi=bin one year. 5. Secure the coffee: Are~ Mag fram the C1 .... of this Sczrd, and by using a/X ~z- LARGE A C,RC_: indica:e cs cJcgely as ~cssm,e the {caaricn cf thi~ dock. On fl~e reverse side of mop, provide a SCAL[ DRAWING which will show Ordincry High ~A/at~ Mcrk, the Cn~ size of the d=ck and any suspJemen~aJ pilings which ore needed to hoId e f .....m~ ..... := EXTEiiDS OFFSHOP~ ~rcm the O. H. W. i%%. If a~]acen~ prope~y oWllers have docks, specify locauion and lengzk to scale · 6. %VIII any ~ortion of this construction extend offxhore ;~.- ~ " .. - l~ne or bound2n/ ~crmed ay other s~m~lor sr-uctur¢ o =nm thC ~ ~' , -ycnd_cn 7. Prcvlde ~ho follcwlng dec=ments: (o) A Licensed Engineer's Survey of lhe pre=e~y invoived. (b} A cc~,l of the Conrrcct=r's Plans and Specificotlons. Mark or ~ne are-Jaino of ony meter;al'from T~.~. ~".,' ' ~ . q Lk%~n°~,gn Form A/-. (Apph.e.~on for Dreegmg~ Fd.ng) must be cornN=te.. -n-~ ...... = ~ Ir ~t 9. In r.Tqucstinrj CDDFOVO[ 0[: t}lis cpDlicctic:m, J subm,t that: the mforn' ,n.. bes~ cf my ,:no'.,.Iodge and belief; I cm the ~'~'::n :cccur. r::ie for i~vc~ved~ ~ fu~zhcr. ~ ,n~3~.~ tO cchure to cnc ~:~de bv the Turrns lC. TO e..~ed._, finding specific location · .. · · ./__for lJlSpec.io~, lad!cate ~ '~:l~-'l :-: ~z ~i~g ~ temporary ~arker., //~ B~ROAD%~ATERS COVE · ~ta.R INA ~roposed work note in red uree~, / / BROADWA1ERS COVE hb[RINA Norman C. Boos MARINA 2X/. 78 ' NANCY DREDGED GRAHAM 12.79' INLET M4P OF' PROPERTY /VORM,ZiN C. 800S AT'E~ST CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF' sOUTHOLD 5uFF'OLK COUNTY, N.Y. SCALE" I ~' 40' APRIL 26, 1983 N.Y.$. LIC. NO. 2872S RiV_~RH£A D, hi. Y. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED ~ USCB6 BENCH MARK D 3~ EL. 31.804 Norman C. Boos Application for ]Tetlands Permit Marina is a Pre-existing marina. Prior licenses and permits as follows: Army Corps of Engineers #11112 Dated 8703/79 To construct 440 L.F. Bulkhead D.E.C. i~T~15276-O109,,A,, SP Dated 1/12/79 To construct 440 L.F. Bulkhead D.E.C. t~T!~15276-O109"A,' p~ Construct 30' x 10' ramp DEC '10 81-0184 Dated 10/81 Construct 1 family house. Town of Southold dated 10/26/82 #11982 Construct 1 family house BROAD~¥ATERS COVE ro osed work noted ~ in red - all else existing, B~ROADIYATERS COVE · ~DLRINA proposed work noted ..... · in red .' ~13_ elbe B~ROAD~TATER S COVE ,\ . [ ~roposed work noted (~t~) .,.' L_ in red ............. · - .... al.% elme Tuesday night, that matter is very much at issue. Mr Boos is asking to increase the capacity of his marina from 37 to 55 s ips. He said the expansio'~ is necessary to keep his operation financially viable, and to meet increased demand. Although opponents of the expansion were so plentiful that Trustee president Stouten- burgh was forced to ask other spectators to wait in the hall, the opposition was not universal. None other than North Fork ~c~t ~th fo~ oTexpanslnn ~ave 'qua!i[ied support to the ' I agree it should go to the ZBA first, ;he said, "but we desperately need more marina space. It's a better wa~ ~oats and their pellution." Mrs Oliva's opinion was shared ~thers at the lneeting, John Bedneski Jr.. who said: how it would do any harm. 1 fortunate that Mr. Boos is willing this. This (expansion) is needed to bri~ dollars inlo the marina to pay feel Mr Bt)os certainly is eetitled to this "Sometimes the popular decision isn'l always the best decision," Mr. Bednoski concluded. Trustee Frank Kujawski, although stopping short of endorsing the project, said he is unaware of any significant ~nvironmental problems with it. Foes: Charge More Money Opponents of the expansion suggested, among other things, that Mr. Boos raise docking fees instead of increasing the number of slips. They cited pollution from boats currently using the marina, and expressed concern about future Once the Boos application was tabled, FORM NO. S TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. (ow, r~r or/~uthorized agemnt of owner) · i~'~'c~ress of owner or authorized agent of owner) (/2' PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Date ....... ~/'~,~, ..).4., '~, Zoning Ordinance ·. >~'.~- · ~'.' ' ' ' ~'-~ ................. Other Applicable Lows, Ordinances'or Regulations ............................................ at remises herenafter described in that ~.~.~..z.../..;.~/.~..~.../.~:.2~.~..., ~?h/~; ~../.{.<.. P ~ (state charo~er of vmolatfon) in violation of ..~..~...~..~t..~ ...... ~ ........~...:...~..:'...~..~ .............. -/ .................................. (State section or ~rograph of applicable law, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED to comply with the law and to remedy the ~o.~,tion, ~.~.~t,o~ed ,o.~w,~ o. or ~e'or. ,h. .................. .::...: .................................. o, ........... .......... , Th~ ~r~mi~ 1o which thi~,O~[R TO RIM[DY VIOkATIO~ refer~ ore situated Foilure to r~med~ the condition* o{ore~oid ond ~o compl~ wi~h the opplic~bl~ provisions consti~ut~ on o{{~n~ puni~ho~]~ by {in~ or imprisonm~ or both. Building Inspector · 0~ NO. ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE $OUTHOLD, N. Y. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Date ........ 7 .......................... ~ r.. ill' TO .............. '('/' ............. (owner or authorized oge?t of owner) i~,d~;~"ss 'oi owner or authorized agent of owner) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances'or Regulations ............................................ /.- ~ (state glz',e, rocter of violation) (State section or paragraph of applicable low, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED to comply with t~u: law and to remedy the conditions above mentioned forthwith on or before the .................... ~'~ ............................................. day of .......... .......................... The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers ore situated at ~../,(,:...~,.1~,~,~'~., ... ~'~'~-zt.s.-,,,.,...County of Suffolk, New York. Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions of law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. HOBERT W. GILL[SPIE, JR,, CHAIRMAN CHAR LESGRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. EiDUTHDLD, L. I., hi. Y. June 1, 1978 TELEPHONE76~ 1802 ~r. Angelo G. Petrucci Day Avenue Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Petrucci: As you know, your business on the south side.of Bay Avenue, Cutchogue, New York, is classified as a non-conforming marina or boat basin. According to our present zoning ordinance, a non-conforming use is any use, whether of a building or tract of land, or both, existing on the effective ~ate of the zoning ordinance, which does not conform to the use regulations of the district in which it is located. The definition of a marina is any premises containing one (1) or more piers, wharves, docks, moorings, bulkheads, buildings, slips, basins or lands under water, designed, used or intended to be used primarily for the docking or mooring of boats, for or without compensation. Using your letter of May 17, 1978, and the above definitions as a guide, J.t seems to us that your non-conforming marina includes the following: The seasonal operation of a marina or boat basin with docks or slips fer not more than thirty-five (35) non-commercial boats not more than 24 feet in length. Special services for owners such as fresh water, electricity, oil and gasoline are also permitted. We think that this service barge is an integral part of your marina operation and may be stored on your property when not in use. You are not permitted to store boats, build boats or conduct the retail sale of boats on your premises. iiopefully, this clearly defines all permitted uses for your property. If there are any other questions, please bring them to our attention.  .~u~ very i~r)lly, ~ CItAIRM~N RWG:bcc cc: Mr. Char]es Grigonis Mr. Edward F. Hinderman ,~DBERT W. [~ILLISPIE,~JF~. BOX z~AST MARION, L.I.,N.Y. 11939 July 27 1982 Mr G.P Goehringer Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Southeld New York Appeal #2914 Norman Boos Application Dear Gerry Mr Angelo Petrucci came to see me today on behalf of Boos. You have also spoken to me about this application. I enter the discussion with hesitation and not to interfere. Ny recollection is that a four lot subdivision was approved by the Board of Appeals sometime in the 1960's adjoining the Petrucci marina..that the 100' easterly lot of this subdivision was sold (now Wenks)..that at some point this 100' lot was increased in width to 175'. Without tracing the complicated history of the balance of the property as amended to two lots on 4/25/72 survey.. my understanding is that ownership of the balance rests with Boos. with upland of 70507 sq ft..and that Boos wants to separate the marina from the residential site. , The result of all this is that instead of four possible residential lots and a marina~the possible density has been reduced to two residential sites and a marina. It seems to me that this reduction in density goes a long)way toward making what was a perfectly legal use(prior to Zoning conform to ever-increasing standards most of which the applicant has already met including Board of Health,D.E.C.,and parking requirements. It should further be remembered that any expansion of minimal services which the marina provides is limited and defined by the June 1 1978 letter and controlled by the Board of Appeals. Having been sued a number of times(even thou6h in a dQ-gooder role) and fully aware of small business difficulties in Southold as are other members of the Board,I tend to sympathize with the applicant's desire to separate his business lisbilty from his residence. In this connection I am increasingly aware of professional people leaving the state of New York because of liability premiums. In view of the foregoing special circumstances..some of which may be new to you and the Board..it is my view that reconsideration of this application without prejudice would be part of an orderly procedure. Further I am convinced that an outcome favorable to the applicant would not injure the safety,health,and welfare of the Town of Southold ?Respect ful!y ~ Retired Chairman of the BoyhoOd Town Board of Appeals ~ Board of/tpPeals .Town of Sonlhold July 26, 1982 Zoni~ Board of A~eals Southold Tovm Southold, N. Y. 11971 Gentlemen, Today ~. An~elo Petrucci called on me in reference to some matters oertaining to bulk requirements for lots which include wetlands. For many years the bulk requirements for lots in the A zone have been allowed to be ~ulfilled with saltwater wetlands. The area of such wetlands has also been allowed in comouting units in the "~" district. If the code has been changed in this regard ~ am not aware of it. At the same time, Luyears east, the Planning Boar~ in at- temoti~ to be reasonable, and with the aoproval of the County Board of Health, arbitr~rily set a minimum area of about ~0,000 seuare feet of bu~ao-z'~-zar~-'-a~-~ne Again, buildable land was exoected to be above normal high water line and where oak trees ~row in the natural state. ~:,r. Petrucci's m~.or subdivision was ~ranted because it ful- filled these requirements. His ore-existing private marina also fulfilled requirements at the time. I n reading the aooeal, it aopears that the proposed vari- ance would result tn buildable areas in excess of that required of minor subdivi~ons unless reMulations have been changed with- out my knowledge. Sincerely yours, cc, Southold To%~ Planning Board " " Buildin~ Insp. Steohen Griffins, Esq. John Wiclduam JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICEOFTHETOWN CLERK TOWN OFSOUTHOLD December 20, 1983 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 3201 application of Norman C. Boos for a variance. Also inclued is notification to adjacent property owners; Short Environmental Assessment Form; Letter relative to N.Y.S. Tidal Wetlands Land-Use; and survey. Judith T. Terry V Southold Town Clerk TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. ~<~(~ I DATE .. ,~.~,/.. ~ .~./..~. ,~ TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ~, (We).~.0.~....0......~.e..~ .............................. of .............. 1...(~.~#~..~..%, .................................... Name of Appella.nt Street and Number ................. ~l'~l)~.ql~l~, ...................................................... .N..:..~.... ............. HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION DATED: FOR: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) ( ) ) Name of Applicant for permit of Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO BUILD 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ...~9..~.l~kl'l~..~.~..l~.~.~...~e.)...~~.L~. Street and Hamlet Zone ...~1000~10.~/~8/~..~ OWNER(S): Norll~H ~. Baal Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article , Section letter dated 6/1/~8 i~om R. Oille~p~e to &. ~®trueet 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for ( ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. ~16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ..... ¢;~.~/.~. ............... Dated ...~..T~')..~...~Z~.f,~..~~ REASON FOR APPEAL ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ~s requested for the reason that we ~ou'ld 'l±ke to by ~a a~dltllm~l 18 ~11 ~. (Continue on oth~r side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because Of both oommmity need and finaAolu! requirements. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this. use d.is,trig, t b. eca~se _~.rope.l't,.y is a noli-ooilfermiuJ[ marina located in Reszaen~l/AF. rlcu~ural A zone. 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because the proposed pro,'Joot :l.s looatod oonpletely wif~ in the oonftnes of the extstln& propertyt (Wholly owned by Byeolfo lnoludtn& tho land under the water) and cannot bo seen from the road. Adequate parkln& is available on narlna property. This marina is unique in that it is entirely private property, not extendinf into town waters. EUZASETH ANN NEVILLE IIOTARY PIJ~J~ mate d New yolk REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because of both community need and financial requirements. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because property is a non-conforming marina located in Residential/Agricultural A zone. 3 Tt~e Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because the proposed project is loeated completely within the confines of the existing property, (Wholly owned by myself, including the land under the water) and cannot be seen from the road. Adequate parking is available on marina property. This marina is unique in that it is entirely private property, not extending'into town waters. COUNTY Sworn to this ................ ~....~[ .......... day of ....... ~~ 19c~ NOT~IY FUWC, lira d Niw Ym TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. APPEAL NO. DATE.... I.~),,/.~-~/.~.._~).. 1, (We)..~.9..r.~.a.P...g......B..9. g..s. .............................. of .............. l..~ed~r...S.t. ..................................... Name of Appellant Street and Number ................. Mas.s.a.pf~q.u.a.., ....................................................... .N..:..Y..: .............. HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION DATED: FOR: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Nome of Applicant for permit of Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO BUILD 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ...SO0.Q..Skui%k..L~,zL~..'.(.J]~y...A~.~.,.,~...g.l,lgb.¢.hg~l~..e.,..~y.._ ,- ,,, Street and Hamlet Zone .... #.1.00.0,,~t. 0.4-/0..8/.2,.,,,.5. ...................................... OWNER ( $ ): .... ~.OXI~B..Q ,. J3.o.o.~j ...... Map No. Lot No. DATE PURCHASED: A~.~ ,..2.3.~. ~.9.7.~ ..... 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article , Section letter dated 6/1/78 from R. Gillespie to A. Petrucai TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. '16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 ' ' of the Building Inspector or~w!th respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... ( ) ( ) (x) REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that we would like to increase dockage facilities by an additional 18 small boats. Form ZB1 (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because 0:~ II~Otll OOIIGIl'l~3r GOld alld :~;I.l~lloiaI rlqlirlllllt, i. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because llro~ie~r'+-]r B~rina looated in Rosldenttal/Agricultur~l A zone. 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CFIARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because %he ]~ropoled oompletoly wt~ in the ~nrinu or ~e ~Astl.s p~rty, (~lly owned by ~lolf, ~ncl~t~ ~he ~ oGot be se~ fre~ the ~ad. Adequate p~r~ ~s available private prolmrty, not extendi~ ~nto to~n watorB. STATE OF NEW,YORK ) ~ /~ COUNTY 0'~_~I ss ~? ........... S orn toth,s ...... ................... TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1, (We). j~j~. j l~. j lj.~jJgJ. .............................. of. ............. ~..~.ldL~r...~.~.,, .................................... Name of Appellant Street and Number ................. J~llJ~lJJ~llJ~.~ ...................................................... .N.,,..~...,. ............. HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION DATED: FOR: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) ( ) ( ) Name of Applicant for permit of Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO BUILD ...1~.~000/.~04,/~l.~/2o5 ....................................... OWNER ($): .... ~,~"AI,~JI...C., .]~J~ ...... Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article , Section letter dated 6/1/T8 fro., R. Glllesple to A. Petruoe! 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for ( ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ( ) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that we would like to orease dookase by an addit~onal 18 small boats. Form ZB1 (Continue on other side) BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter or' the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold : TO: Stephen Gross 425 E. 58th St. New York, NY 10022 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned~to~p~i~ion the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold (Variance) (Special Exception)~(S~e~ial Permit~ (Other) [circle choice] to request a To have dockage for~ff~additional 18 small boats ). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adiacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: S.s Skunk Lane (Bay Ave.) ~ Cutchogue · a× #lO00/104/aS/ . 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is tocated in the following zoning district: 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: same as 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are Article II Section. 6./1/78 letter of prior Chairman 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the 5outhold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road 5outhold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 7~'5-1809. ? 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchmanj newspapers published in the Town of $outhold and designated for the publication of such,notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: Dee. 16; 19a.q Petitioner Norman C. Boos Post Office Address 1 Cedar St. Massapequa, NY 117158 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICF ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS NAME ADDRESS D. P. Brickley 144 Shore~.A~ei,~F :Quincy, M~ss]-02'169 Stephen Gross H~chbaum ~ 21 Watersi~e,~°~ ~v~ :,~ Mr. &.Mrs. C. No. R5CBPl FOR CER/~RSD MA~k No. ~,c ~'~;uaa~c~ ~ ,~,,~ ~ao~t,~,: RECEIPT FOR GERT FIEU MAIL '~01 FOR I';-&Rt&T,0'~A~ ~4AL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOEO-- RECEIPT FOR CERT~FIED MAIL S .... NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOED-- v: - ....... See Revers~ NO1 FOR NTERNATIONAL MAIL .~ t ephc n Gross 425 E. 58%h St. New York. NY 100~2 ~ ~+ · , l). P · Briokley See Reverse 144 Shore Ave. 0.169 i (~uiney o ]p-C,~.~ , Mass. 21 Waterside Pl. A ~ ?~ New York NY ! COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss.: ' : . residing at } ~ ~.-/~ ' ~ ~'~4/¢~z'~,.~' ~. //~y~ , being duly sworn, de~os~s and~ys that on the ~ day ~of' ~f- * .... , 19 ~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses sel opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- rice at ~//~ ~ ,~ /~'~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. I APPEALS BOARD ROBERT W. GILLISPIE, JR., CHAIRMA~ ROBERT BERGEN 1 CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN. JR. June 1, 1978 I Mr~]~_ngelo G. Petruccl __:~ Ba~'IAvenue ~ AS you know, your business on the south side of Bay Avenue, cutch~, New York, is classified as a non-conforming marina or boat basin. According to our present zoning ordinance, a non-conforming use is any use, w~ether of a buildin? or tract of lan~, or both, existing on the effective date of the zonlng.ord%nanc?,'w~ic~ does not conform t~ th? ~dse~regu%ati?ns of the 9istrlct 1~ Which it is located. The definitlo~ --'~3of~a marina is any premises contal~i~g on~ [1). or more res, i ~ docks, moorings, bulkheads, buildings, slipS] basins or 'wa~er, designed, used or intended to be used primarily for the d6Cking]'~ o~ mooring of boats, for or without compensation. Using your letter of May 17, 1978, and the above definitions as a guide, it seems to us that your non-conforming marina includes the following: The seasonal operation of a marina or boat basin with docks or slips for not more than thirty-five (35~ non-commercial boats not more than 24 feet in length. Special services for owners such as fresh water, electricity, oil and gasoline are also permitted. We think that this service barge ls an integral part of your marina operation and may be stored on your prgperty when not in use. You are not permitted to store boats, build boats or conduct the retail' sale of boats on your premises. Hopefully, this~clearly defines all permitted uses for your property. If there are any other questions, please bring them to our attention~ RWG:bcc cc: Mr. Charles Grigonis Mr. Edward F. Hinderman u o wn ar e ~ ~~ TELEPHONE 765~fL~x 1802 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ROBERT W. G ILLISPIE, JR., CHAIRMAN ROBERT BERGEN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN JR. May 16, 1978 Mr. Angelo G. Petrucci Bay Avenue Cu~chogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Petrucci: Relative to your appearance before the Board of Appeals on Thursday, May 4, 1978, the Board would appreciate -your setting forth all phases of business that you have conducted on your property on the south side of Bay'Avenue since you have owned the property.. Upon receipt of this information, we should be able to solve all problems concerning this property. Thank you for your help in this matter. Yours truly, ROBERT W. GILLISPIE, JR. CHAIRMAN RWG:bcc To. Dredl~e th~ ~oa~ '~ln for .,ne, o.. the and John~.' wtOkh.~/.lnspect~;/ ~n~. aPDro~e~ the _.~'~'~-~%~ ~-,t~:~ ~ ~-~ !: :. Between 51xte~'n~:~h~enty Fcu~ Feet. -- However fo~ Hopl~j this' .. i;)redsXn6,;gxoav&tXn~ And .iktlkhead.l.n~ . .-'__/.: m~",d, ucted all' phases o.r th.ts E~aaln 9ualneei:"~n the same ParQel. of 9reperty. 11935 Ccde ~1.-{~4~ 6604 one of my ~lllheade'.. SHORT ENVIROh%IEHTkL ASSESSMENT O O 0 C O O O I,ISTRUC ~ (a) In order to answer the questions in this shor~ gAF is is assumed that the preparer will uae currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action· It is not ex-posted that additional studies, roeeareh or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be si~nificant and a ccmpleted Envirommental Assessment Form is necessary, (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is significant. (d) Enviror. mental Assessment Will project result in a large physical c~mnge to the project cite or physically alter more t~han l0 acres of land? · . ..... Yes x No 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site? Yes x No 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? . · · · · Will project have a potentially large impac~ on gro,/ndwater quality? . . . . · · . 5. Will project significantly effect drainage flow 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? · · · · · · 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on 8. Will project have a ~mJor effect on visual char~ aster of the conmunity or scenic views or vistas known to be important to the tom. reunify? . · · 9. Will project adversely impact any site or struct- ure of historic, pre-historic, or paleontological importance or any site designated as a critical environmental area by a local agency? . · · lC. Will project have a major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? . · . ll. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb- anco as a result of the project's operation? · 13. 'gill project have any impact on public health or sar ty? 1L. Will project Affect the existing community by directly causing a ~rowth in permanent popula- tion of more than 5 percent over a one-year period o__r have a major negative effect on the character of the com~munlty or neighborhood?. · 15. is there public ~o~troversy concerning the project? REPRESE:;TIUG: DATE: Yes x No Yes X No Yes ~ No Yes x No Yes x No Yes x No Yes __x No Yes x No ,,, Yes x No Yes x No Yes x No Yes x No Yes ~ No Owner QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND FILED WITH APPLICATION TO THE Z.B.A. The New York State Tidal Wetlands and Use Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Part 661, requires an application to the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation, Environmental Analysis Unit, Building 40, S.U.N.Y., Stony Brook, NY 11794, (tel. 516-751-7900), if you have checked Box #1 and/or Box #6 below. Please either call their office or personally visit them at their Stony Brook office for instructions and application forms. Once you have received written notification of approva please provide our office with a copy (with the conditions) as early as possible in order that we may continue processing your Z.B.A. application. [ ) [×) [ ] [ ] ( ] [ ] I. Waterfront without bulkheading 2. Waterfront with bulkheading in good condition [ ] the full length of the property £ x ] at least I00' in length 3. Not located within 300' of waterfront or wetlands area May be located within 300' of waterfront or wetlands area; however, the following structure separates my property from this environmental area: [ ] 50' existing road [ ] existing structures [ ] bluff area more than 10' in elevation above mean sea level 5. This proposed addition/expansion of an existing building will be more than 75' from the landward edge of tidal wetlands/waterfront areas. This proposed addition/expansion of an existing building will NOT be more than 75' from the landward edge of tidal wetlands/waterfront area. [ ] 7. Please be aware that any and all subdivisions and new dwellings will also require an application to the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation for their review and approval. If you are able to provide them with recent photographs of the project and wetland areas, it would help expedite the processing of your applica- tion. This questionnaire is made to explain the requirements of this State Law and to prevent any unnecessary delays in processing your application(s). 10/831k · ~.s.t. 1950 · Igwa#vaters A4ar// a BAY AVENUE (Skunk Lane), CUTCHOGUE, L. I., N. Y. 11935 Secluded Dockage with Electricity Contract - Summer DockaAe 1984 Days: 433-0010 Evenings: 541-4604 Marina 734-6323 MaUing Address: Norman C. Boos ! Cedar St., Massepequa, N. Y. 11758 Registration Boat Name Length of Boat Width of Beam__ Tel.~ Owner Name & Address RENTAL FEE IS FOR PERIOD OF APR. 1, through Nov. 1, ONLY Please circle which is applicable for your boat. Minimum to 16' - $325.00 21' - $400.00 17' - 340.00 22' - 415.00 18' - 355.00 23' - 430.00 19' - 370.00 24' - 445.00. 20' - 385.00 For your.convenience gas & oil a~ available. I hereby acknowledge that the aforementioned fee is to be paid in the following manner: DEPOSIT: - Minimum of 25~ to be received at Broadwaters Cove Marina by Feb. 15, 1984. BALANCE: - To be paid in full and received at Broadwaters Cove Marina by 4/15/84. PLEASE NOTE: Reservations cannot be held unless payment in full is received by 4/15/84. I clearly understand that the said fee is for a rental charge only and that Broadwaters Cove Marina is NOT RESPONSIBLE for any damage caused by weather, fire, theft, accident or any oontigency beyond our control. I also agree to abide by the following rules and regulations: NO speed in excess of 5MPH in ~RINA OR CILMNNEL, no loitering, unattended children, swimming, crabbing or fishing in marina. NO LIVE ON BOARD. Any infringement of the above rules may lead to expulsion'from the marina~ PLEASE NOTE FURTHER: Dockage after November 1, BY SPECIAL PERMISSION ONLY. Signature Acknolvledgement : WE ARE NOT TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER, THEFT, FIRE, ACCIDENTS --- - OR OTHER CONTINGENCIES BEYOND OUR CONTROL. HENRY E, RAYNOR. ,Ir., Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. T O',~-'N Southold. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 April 28, 1982 Mr. Stephen F. Griffing, Jr. Attorney at Law 120 Court Street Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Norman C. Boos Dear Mr. Griffing: At a regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, April 26, the following action was taken: .RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny without preju- dice approval of the sketch map entitled Norman C. Boos, located at East Cutchogue, dated August 19, 1981, as the property is under 40,000 square feet and dual use of the westerly lot is not permit- ted under Subdivision Regulations for an A-Residential Zone. Yours very truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD cc: Board of Appeals By Susan E. Long, Secretary (- ( TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD "' Suffolk County, New York 516- 765-1B01 ~~ July 26, 1982 Board of Aopeals Southold Southeld, N. Y. 11971 Gentlemen, Today ~. Ar~elo Petrucci called on me in reference to some matters pertainin~ to bulk requirements for lots which include wetlands. For ms=ny years the bulk requirements for lots in the A zone have been allowed to be fulfilled with saltwater wetlands. The area of such wetlands has also been allotted in comnuting units in the "M" district. If the code has been changed in this regard t am not aware of it. At the s~e time, in years ~mst, the Planni~ Boar~ in at- temotir~ to be reasonable, and with the aoproval of the Co~u~ty Board of Health, arbitr~_rily set a minimum area of about 30.000 square feet cf buildable 1-~r,d as the minimum they would require. A~ain, buildab!e land v,'as exoected to be above normal high water l~ne and where oak trees ~.o~, in' the natural] state. ~-~..~. Petrucci's .m~nor subdzv~s~on was ~ranted.. because i~ fUl- filled these re0uirements. His ~re-existing private marina also fulfilled requirement~ at the time. I n reading the aooeal, it aopears that the proposed vari- ance would result in buildable areas in excess of that reeuir~d of minor subdivi~ons uniess reEulations have been chart!ed 'with- out my knowledge. Sincerely yours, Southo!d Tow~ Planning Board .... Buildinl InsD. Steohen GriffinE, Esq. JolmWickham TOTAl. AREA , 72,325 SO. F'r, . - TOTAL AREA ~ 4~.546 ~O. FT. .~ .--'"'T '-"-.. '" ' ' ' :-' ~' , " ' " .~., ' '.' -'~'[ '~'q~ ~:~:' ' .... ; '~ " AVENUE ' --: '~ '"' .- ' '- 7bo0£/o4- o8-2./ 2.3 CONTOUR LINE AND ELEVAT/ON$ AR~ REFERENCED TO U.S~8 G. .,~ . >, .~. : ~.~,...'f,~..~ .,.~:,--..~,~......r~,_,-.,~.~.~, .... , ..., . :,- ~'~ INLET FORM NO, 3 ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ................................ /e,o ~..,~.~... 7>-'.. . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your2pp,i¢~-i~rfdated . .~ ~...(~..., 19~.. for pe~it to ~. ~]~/~..~~ ................................ at Location of Property .. ~a ..... ~t~..~., ....... ~z~(~O~{~ ~:~ County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .../~.~ ..... Block .. ~.~ ....... Lot .~'. A .... Subdivision ........ .' ........ Filed Map No ..... ~ ........ Lot No .................. is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds · .~t??./~.O ~.c.-~..~. ..~o.,~V.. ~.//Z./..~(<SY.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.~ , . .7~.. 6~o ..~/~:~/~.. w ~.,:~,. . .~/~ . ?~.~,.o. .: . .~.~ . . ~.~. :o.o. ~.~. ~. . . Buildkg Inspector RV 1/80 April 15, 1982 Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Planning Board of Town of Southold Main Road, State Road 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Norman C. Boos Dear Mr. Raynor: I am still trying to clear the confusion on the Norman C. Boos application. The review of my file indicates the following: Mr. Boos' application to subdivide was disapproved by the Building Department on October 22, 1981. At the time of the disapproval there was pending an application with your Board, which had been filed on October 13, 1981. Subsequent to that, Mr. Boos and I appeared and you requested additional information. Confirming our telephone conversations I made an investigation of the property and found as follows: That the property had been developed by Angelo Petrucci as residential and marina properties. He having created the marina by dredging the inlet and the marina area as shown on proposed minor subdivision map made by Robert Kart last dated October 15, 1981. I also found out that Mr. Petrucci had in effect done subdivision without application to your Board; he having sold property to Boos, Wenk, Leeman, and perhaps others. I also investigated the status of the marina and enclose a copy of letter to Southold Board of Appeals explaining its status. The effect of Mr. Boos' application is to somewhat reduce the size of the marina and convert it from non-conforming use to conforming residential use. It is my understanding that you probably cannot approve the subdivision for reason that the residential parcel, even though the bed of the dredged inlet is owned by Mr. Boos, would be too small when the inlet area is excluded from the lot area, which would make the application appropriate to be referred to the Zo~ng Board of Appeals, who as well as you have been furnished with proof of compliance with NYS Department of Environmental Conservation regulations. Therefore, I request that you put the matter on your calendar and if you can grant the minor subdivision, fine; and if not, refer us to the Board of Appeals for their action, as I understand the procedure involved in the Town of Southold is that application must first be made to your Board and then to the Board of Appeals. I have applications pending before both Boards. This matter has been ppreciate your prompt attention to this letter.in abeyance for quite a while and I would i,~~~'~ '~~ S~ .n ~. G~iffqng,'Jr . i SFG:cg Encs. cc: Mr. Norman C. Boos FORM NO. 3 ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ................................ ../. ~....C'.o. ~..,~.~... D-'.. ........... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your~,p,iCati~'~dated . .(~'~'-O ~...f'..~.. .... 19~?..~', . for ~ ,o ~.~:~,. ~,- ,~..~~ ................................ ~t co~ty z~ ~ ~o. ~oo0 Section .../~.% ..... ~o~ .. ~.~ ....... Zot .~../. .... Subdivision ........ ~. ........ Filed Map No ........ ~ ........ Lot No .................. is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds . .~t"~.~./O.O~..~...,~.a~'. ,~,,,,..~,,~,,,,~?. ~.~../~-~.~.,',,~.~.~., "--' Building Inspector RV 1/80 A vENUE 69.65' N. 85 "46' O0 ~ E. 150.0' '%. TOT,qL ,qRE~ =45,5465Q. Fl~. ;Y~ 1-ER I~RE,~= 12,064 SQ. FT. LAND Z~REI~ =33, 482 SO. Fl~. N. 87°2~'50"~ 12.79' IV /O /F NAIVC Y GR~H~.,',4 GED IIVLEr ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO U.$.C. SG. BENCH MARK 0326 EL. 31.804 SURVEY FOR NO/~MAN C. [~005 AT E~ST CUTCHOGUE TOWN Of: SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. SCALE: I": 40' 13U'G. /0, ,~UG II, 1981 OCF 6, 1981 REF£REHCE~ N.¥$ LIC. t.'0.'.-6725 FIVF£ H£,t D~ NORMAN C. BOOS' 1 Cedar St., Massape.qua, N. Y. 11758 OF PROJECT (Secl~on of slream, tidal wetland, dam, building) Broadwaters Cove Dredged Inlet D~RIPTION OF PROJECT .Construct a single family dwellingy sanitary system and driveway all greater than 85' from the inlet. Subdivide the property into two lots pursuant to the Robert A. Kart, L.S. survey dated 10/15/81 .submitted. COMMUNITY NAME (City, Town, Village) TOWN East Cut chogue §outho!d COUNTY FIA CO~,tMUNITY NO, DAm NO. Suffolk GENERAL 1. The pe~miltee shall file in the o((ice ol the approprlale Regional 5. Any material'to be deposited or dumped under this permit, either in ~,;~,~-portion of the uncompleted structure or fall and restore Io .ts former CONDITIONS site to its former condition. NO claim shall be made against the State of Ne'~ project. Hazards - Building Permits) an~ ir, no ~a¥ signifies that the projec~ will b~ free from flooding. Sanitary System to be located between the proposed dwelling and Ave. and at least 100' from any surface water. 17. The driveway shall be of a pervious nature and not paved or oiled. DJL: cg c.c. LA~'Y ENFORCEMENT (. attachment 'File Note: %~e are returning your Check No. 8&2 for $25.00-- 10-81-0184 been issued to: ~O~^N o. ~oo~ Cedar. St., ~assapequa, N. ¥. 117~ Construct a single f~mily dwelling, sanitary system, and driveway~l greater than 85 feet from the ~nlet, Subdivide the property into two lots pursuant to the Robert A. Kart, L.S. survey dated 10/15/81 submitted. SuffOlk County ~der ~he Envimnmen~! Cormerva~ion Law, Article 15, ':w Yor[c State [Protection of Water) Article 24, [Freshwater WetiandsJ Article 25, [Tidal Wetlands] Article 36, [Construction in Flood of Environmental Conservation Hazard Areas] ~ DANIEL J. ~LK~~ .,'/i /(~- ' 2/2/+/82 Date Issued 6/3 0/83 ~piration Date APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (txRtll:ti~) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Toxvn Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be Minor Subdivision - No name 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy o{ deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber . 8490 160 8/31/.78 ...................... Page On · Liber 8633 Page 580 On 5/31/79 Liber n/a Page On ......................... Liber Page On · Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ........................ ; as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ... n~.a ................................. or as dlstributee n/a 5. The area of the land is ...2.'.7.9.5.7 ....... acres, or 117,864 square feet. 6. All taxes xvhich are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except .......... None ?. The land is encumbered by . .firsk ....... ................... mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber 8254 Page 189 in original amount more or less of $...5.?:.0.0.0....0.0... unpaid atnount $..4.5.,.3.7..9:.0.0. .... held by ...bvqg.e.l.q ?..e.tF.u.c..c~ ....... .................. address No # Bay Avenuet Box 99, Cutch.ocjue, NY 11935 (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . 8463 Page .... 301.~. in original amount .......... more or l~g~; ...... ......... 15,000.00 . ~ 12,554 00 of $.. unpaid amount ¢ ........ .' .... held by Georgette Petrucci ........................... address .N.o...~..B..ay..A.¥e..n.u.e.,...Bg.x' .9..9,..C.u..t.c.h. qg .u.e.,..N.y...1.%.9.3.5 (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber ...n./..a ...... Page .................... in original amount of $ ................ unpaid ammmt $ ................ held by ........................... .......................... address ...................................................... 8. There are no other encnmbrances or liens against the land except ........................ None 9. The land lies in the folloxving zoning use districts . h..~.e.s.~.d.e.n..e.i.a. 1..7..h.o.w.??.r.:..m.a.r.~99 use · .was..au~hor. i~e..d..by .y.a.r.i..a~..c.e..o.b.t..a.'An.e..d. b~..~.h~..Z.o.n..iD..~ Bgard 9.f..A/~p.e.a.l.s. ~ ........ I0. No part of the land lies under water xvhether tide water, stream, pond ~vater or otherwise, ex- cept Marina and dredged inlet running West from Broadwaters Cove 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land, (d~m0 (does not) li.e in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if xvithin a District, is n/a 13. ~rater mains will be laid hy . ..... N.o. ne. cQn~mDlat~.d ................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for instalI~ing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ...e.x-i.s.'q..i.ng..e. 1..e.c.t.r.J:..c..s.e.r.¥.i.c.e..b.y..L.I.L..CO .................................... and (a) (no) charge xvill be made for installing said lines. ' 15. Gas mains will be installed by None and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County }tighway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shoxvn on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to shoxv same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots shoxving all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D", 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements ~vill be $...N.o.n..e... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at ............ years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". NORMAN C. BOOS 'o'f' Xl;t ii ;; i ............................ .......... (Signttu/'e and Title)' NORMAN C. BOOS, Owner 1 Cedar Street · ~4~.a~.~q~,..~.Y...%~7.5.S, ..................... (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .... S.[J.~..0..LK. ....................... ss: September 81 On the ..................10th day of .......... ............... 19......, before me personally came NORMAN C. BOOS ............................................ to me known to be the ~nd~vidual described in and executed the foregoing instrument, and acknoxvledged/4~at .... h. 9 ........ executed the same. ~1~, 52-1574750 ~allfled Itl Suffolk County STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ~rarai.aas~.,... Ma,~. ~0, On the .................. day .............. of ........... 19 ...... , before me personally came ................................................ to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ................................................ that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal alfred by order of the board of directors of said corpor- ation, and that ............ signed ............ name thereto by like order. Notary Public -, BAY AVENUE INLET I000-10'~1-08-~..I ,9 2,3 CONTOUR LINE AND ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO U.$.C~ 6. Unauthoriz~l alteration o~ addition toth~ euwey I~ 8viola- tion of section 7209 of the NewYork State Edu~;atJon Law. Copies of this survey map not bearing the lalld {u~eyor's inked seal or embossed seal shell not be C~l~ldered to be a valid copy. ding inotitution listed hereon, and to the assignees of the DATUM MAP OF' PROPERTY NORMAN C, BOOS AT EAST CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLO SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. SCALE: AUG. 19, 1981 _ '~' '*~. RECEIVED BY .ROBERT A. KART LAND SURVEYOR ~IYERHEADtN.~ Legal Description of property of NORMAN C. BOOS Dis. Sec. Blk. Lot Dis. Sec. Blk. Lot 1000 104.00 08.00 002.001 1000 104.00 08.00 002.002 SCHEDULE "A" ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the south side of Bay Avenue, at the northwest corner of premises about to be described and the northeast corner of lands now or formerly of D. P. Brickley; RUNNING THENCE the following two courses and distances along the south side of Bay Avenue: (1) North 75° 46' 30" East 225.40 feet; (2) North 85° 46' 00" East 144.63 feet to a point and lands now or formerly of Craig Lehmann and Susan Lehmann, his wife; RUNNING THENCE South 6° 41' 40" East 312.08 feet along last mentioned lands and through a dug channel to a point and lands of Nancy Graham; RUNNING THENCE the following two courses and distances along last mentioned lands: (1) North 76° 00' 00" West 70.85 feet; (2) North 87° 26' 50" West 284.57 feet to a point and lands now or formerly of Brickley; RUNNING THENCE North 12° 8' 10" West 219.00 feet along last mentioned lands to the point or place of BEGINNING. TOGETHER with right to obtain potable water as set forth in Agreement between Georgette Petrucci and Angelo G. Petrucci dated 11/15/74 recorded in Liber 7754 of Deeds, at Page 560. ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being on the Southerly side of Bay Avenue at Cutchogue, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Bay Avenue where the easterly side of land now or formerly of Petrucci intersects the southerly side of Bay Avenue, said point of beginning also being distant South 85° 46' West as measured along the southerly side of Bay Avenue 136.32 feet from a highway monument set in the southerly side of Bay Avenue; RUNNING THENCE North 85° 46' East along the southerly side of Bay Avenue 75 feet; RUNNING THENCE South 5° 53' 50" East 288.32 feet to the northwesterly .Ibank of Broadwater Cove; RUNNING THENCE South 48° 17' 30" West along the northwesterly Bank of Broadwater Cove, 53.64 feet to land now or formerly of Gerhold; RUNNING THENCE North 76° 0' West along said land 28.89 feet to land now or formerly of Petrucci; RUNNING THENCE North 6° 41' 40" West along said land 312.08 feet to the southerly side of Bay Avenue to the point or place of BEGINNING. Adjoining Owners: Application of Norman C. Boos: East : North : West : Bernard Boos Joseph Wenk Cutchogue New Suffolk Park District II,tAP OF PROPE,gTY NOF~M.~IN C. 800S ,4T E~$T CUTCHOGUE TON~N OF' $OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y~ APRIL 26, 1985 AVENUE klA RINA N/O/F' NANCy D~EDGED GRaHaM N /?5' ' Z?E~A ~. CANI-C~ STEPHEN II. OHO:SS Mr. and Mrs. Angelo Petrucci Bay Avenue, P.O. Box 99 Cutchogue, New York 11935 February 27, 1984 Dear Angelo and Georgette: Please forgive what must have seemed very rude in not responding to your letter concerning Norman Boos' pro- posal for more boats. Immediately after receiving your letter, I called John Nickels who as you know was formerly one of the Town Supervisors for Southold and on the Board of Zoning Appeals. John advised me that since it is common knowledge that our house on Broadwaters Cove is on the market, opposition to the Boos' proposal would have been totally discounted and in fact might have hurt your efforts to defeat his addition. Therefore, I did not respond to your invitation to object. If you disagree with Mr. Nickels' opinion, please let me know as I certainly would not want my failure to act to prejudice your position in any way. SHG:zrf Bay Avenue, Box 99 Cutchogue, New York 11935 March 2, 1984 Mr. Stephen H. Gross 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10112 Dear Mr. Gross: Thank you for your kind letter. Ye~, we disagree with Mr. Nickles'opinion. In fact, being our friend we called him and read him your letter dated February 27, 1984. He said at the time he had advised you that the Norman Boos project was not yet a ~najor and public fact. As of to date all the surrounding c~nities, Broadwater Cove Association, Nassau Farms and Nassau Point, Oppose him very strongly in his request to increase this non-confonming marina in this quiet residential area. For your sake (as an adjacent neighbor and facing frc~ your house the new proposed boat base parking field), we strongly urge you to write as Chester H. Hochba~u and Debbie S. Cantor wrote. As you see, anyone buying your home would do like them and investigate what this marina can do. Please write as soon as you can to the SouthOld Town Board of Appeals. Write your letter of disapproval and attach the map we enclose to: Chairman Gerard Goehringer, Southold Board of Appeals Southold Town Supervisor Francis Murphy Please send us a photostat of your letter. Respectful ly, 1 and Georgette Petrucci McNULTY, GILIVlARTIN, D~PIETI~O, NESCI & HAF_F'ELI Janaury 9, 1981 Mr. Chester H. Hochbaum Miss Debra S. Cantor 20 Waterside Plaza Apartment 15D New York, NY 10010 Re: Cantor & Hochbaum from Wenk Dear Mr. Hochbaue and Dear Miss Cantor: In response to your letter of December 31, 1980, please be advised, as follows: 2. I have reveiwed the zoning map and ordinance of Southold town and also have spoken to the real estate broker and am satisfied that your property and the adjacent parcel in question are both zoned residential. The marina that is on the adjacent property is a pre-existing, non-con[orming use and, as such. any opportunity ~or expansion or intensification would be extremely limited at best. Southold Town Board of Appeals Attention: Charles Grigonis, Jr. Main Road-State Road 25 Southold, L.I.N.Y. l1971 Chester H. Hochbaum Debra S. Cantor 20 Waterside Plaza New York, N.Y. lOOlO February 8, 1984 Re: Southold Town Board of Appeals Appeal No. 3201 Variance to Expand Marina Facilities Dear Mr. Grigonis, As owners of the property directly adjacent to Broadwaters Cove Marina, we are opposed to the variance proposed by Mr. Norman Boos for expansion of the marina facilities for the following reasons; l) We call your attention to Southold Town Board of Appeals Action dated September 17, 1982 on Appeal No. 2914, a copy of which is enclosed. In order to gain a variance to the zoning ordinance to enable him to build his house, Mr. Boos 6equested permission to reduce the land area for the marina. Clearly the intention of the zoning Board in granting the Appeal was to increase residential use and limit marina expansion. Now, having gained permission to build the house, Mr. Boos wants to expand his marina property also. Possible expansion of the marina was a concern of oU~s even.before we purchased ou~ property. Before our purchase we asked Mr. Boos about his expansion plans and he told us that he had no intention of bpilding more than his home. Our concern is evidenced by. the enclosed copy of a letter from our lawyer dated January 9, 1981. In reply to our concerns about marina expansion he states that as a pre-existing'non-conforming use, "opportunity for expansion or intensification would be extremely limited at best". We do not consider fifty percent expansion of docking and parking facilities to be "extremely limited". 2) We believ~ there is insufficient space for parking additional cars on the property and we are concerned that cars may be parked in areas not allocated for parking in Mr. Boos' plans. Indeed even in the past, marina patrons have parked their cars in the area wehave marked in red on the enclesed map~ This area is directly adjacent to our residential property~.~nd we believ~is included in the residential portion of Mr. Boos' property and is not allocated for pa~king in any of the previously approved plans nor in the proposed plan. If additional docks are built in thisarea, more patrons will certainly park there in order to be close to their boats, destroying the residential nature of the area. ..... Con't 4) We are concerned about possible effects of the proposed expansion on the safety of our child, ourselves, our neighbors and the rest of the community. The proposed expansion will surely bring an increase in automobile traffic on an already unsafe portion of Skunk Lane. There are blind curves on either side of the marina and speeding is commonplace on this road. Therefore, there is very poor visibility for cars entering or leaving the marina. We are also concerned about ~uch a large increase in boat traffic. The marina is largely unsupervised and adding these docks will make navigation to and from the marina much more hazardous. In addition, the channel leading out of Broadwaters Cove is very narrow and, even in the past, there have been numerous groundings including some on our property where the channel leads into the marina. Our safety concerns are tensified because Mr. Boos proposes to expand this marina, a commercial use in a residential area, even though there is no full-time supervision of the facility as Mr. Boos is normally present on weekends only. Finally, we are opposed to this proposal because of the negative environ- mental impact we believe it will have on Broadwaters Cove and the wetlands in the area. All Boats must motor in and out of the marina, and a fifty percent increase in this traffic will cause increased gasoline and oil pollution in the cove, not to mention the increase in trash thrown or blown overboard. The lack ~ maneuverability in the marina caused by proposed expansion might increase damage to the banks of the Wetlands. And the additional traffic in the channel leading out the marina passes directly through our property, jeopardizing the marshes at the edge of the water. We are also concerned with the lack of sewage f~cilities at the marina and the effects of raw untreated sewage disposed of directly into Broadwaters Cove on swimmers and natural wildlife. Please consider that the area surrounding Broadwaters Cove Marina is entirely residential in nature, and most of the residents believe that expansion of'~his' commercial activity as proposed would be detrimental to the wetlbeing of the entire community. Indeed, we have supported Mr. Boos' previous proposals for variances needed to build his house, as residential development of the property was deemed a positive asset to the community. Thank you for your kind attention. Very truly yours, f~h~ter H. Hochbau~i' Debra S. C~ntor 124 HOME STREET MALYERNE, NEW YORK 11565 516-593-2366 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road State Road 25 Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: May 4, 1984 RE: Appeal #3203 Application of Norman C. Boos Location 8000 Skunk Lane Project: Expand Cutchogue Marina by 18 Add'l. Boats SPREEN-MC qUAID HOUSE ON SKUNK LANE My wife and I occupy the house directly across the street from the home of Mr. Boos. We have never been notified of any application for a variance, neither in writing or by Mr. Boos personally. Let me begin by saying that my wife and I (and my brother-in-law and wife McQuaid) are thoroughly opposed to this expansion. There is no reason to allow a commercial operation to be that close to our home. The parking facilities are in great shortage now for the existing boat slips (35). The traffic of cars on Skunk Lane has increased alarmingly. We have owned our home for 17 years and in the last few years the marina has been operated as "big business"; to further increase this volume would constitute an unnecessary hazard to a private dwelling community. Skunk Lane is the only road to Nassau Point and to allow the further expansion of a con~ercial operation in a residential area seems to be an infringemant of our rights to privacy, lack of noise and unnecessary disturbances. Mr. Boos constructed his home on a work day of 10-12 hours, 7 days a week for months and caused enough of a disturbance that I see no reason to believe he will be any more concerned with the effect of operating full-time co~a~er- cial marina less than 100 feet from two homes. Finally, the discharge of pollutants-sewerage in an area where all residents have wells for their drinking water would appear to be a hazard that certain- ly could be detrimental to the health of several families. I know nothing of the problem that this could cause to the adjacent wetlands--but it should be further proof that there is justification to consider this matter care- fully before granting any permit. When Mr. Petrucci operated this marina it was a small operation--how it ever got to 35 slips was something we always questioned but we assumed it was Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- May 4, 1984 permissible within the sale to Mr. Boos by Mr. Petrucci. But to further allow this expansion is unthinkable and certainly consti- tutes an infringement of our rights to maintain our status as a residential environment. Very~truly ~ours, HJS:lrs Skunk Lane Box 95 F. CUtchogue, New York 11935 May 4, 1984 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road State Road 25 Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: RE: Appeal #3203 Application of Norman C. Boos I am writing to protest expansion of the marina dockage facilities at 8000 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue in the name of Norman C. Boos. I live with my children directly across from the present home of Mr. Boos. I nor my children were never notified of Mr. Boos' application to expand. The traffic on Skunk Lane is very heavy as it is the only road to Nassau Point. The location of the present marina is at a bend which has been hazardous for as long as I have been there. Drivers attempt to pass the cars depositing people at their boats causing screeching of brakes and skidding constantly in front of our home. This parcel of land and body of water was never intended to handle the excessive boat traffic already present. How can an expansion ever be considered when this plus the huge impact on the already endangered envrionment is evaluated. Please do not allow this proposal to proceed any further. Yours truly, DELL I~'RP 9Y 188 La Salle Avenue Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey 07604 Box # 95 ~ Bay Avenue Cutchogue, New York 1~935 March 5, 1984 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Goehringer~ It has come to our attention that an appeal for a variance is being sought by our neighbor, Mr. Norman C. Boos of Bay Avenue, Cutchogue. Mr. Boos has requested a variance to build eighteen additional boat slips on his residentially zoned property. As home owners who would be directly affected by this increased docking space, we wish to go on record in opposition of the Board of Appeals granting permission for his application which represents an enlargement of the present marina by almost fifty percent. Decisions of all boards are made for the good of all the public concerned, especially when related to health, safety and tranquility. Granting this variance would create a hazardous condition with regard to increased traffic conditions and parking facilities. As you are aware Bay Avenue is a heavily travel~ thoroughfare, as it ~is t~e only egNess.and regress to and from Nassau Point and th9 ~b~l¢~b~h~i'~To.~Add to this congestion is to aggravate a pre~xisting~ha~ar~ous 'iS~tuation. ~ Also a factor .~e.~~is the environmental impact on n~igh~rs An the ~di, a~ity. We urge you to consider our request favorably. We would appreciate notif~=.atioa of any public hearing reqarding this matter.%~' ,~ .~ ~ ~ '~ Thank you very much for your kindness. Chester H. Hochbaum Debra S. Cantor 20 Waterside Plaza New York, N.Y. 10010 February 8, 1984 Southold Town Supervisor Attention: Francis J. Murphy Old Main Road Mattituch, N.Y. 11952 Re: Southold Town Board of Appeals Appeal No. 3201 Variance to Expand Marina Facilities Dear Ms. Murphy, As owners of the property directly adjacent to Broadwaters Cove Marina, we are opposed to the variance proposed by Mr. NOrman Boos for expansion of the marina facilities for the following reasons; l) We call your attention to Southold Town Board of Appeals Action dated September 17, 1982 on Appeal No. 2914, a copy of which is enclosed. In order to gain a variance to the zoning ordinance to enable him to build his house, Mr. Boos requested permission to reduce the land area for the marina. Clearly the intention of the zoning Board in granting the Appeal was to increase residential use and limit marina expansion. Now, having gained permission to build the house, Mr. Boos wants to expand his marina property also. Possible expansion of the marina was a concern of o~fs even~before we purchased ou~ property. Before our purchase we asked Mr. Boos about his expansion plans and he told us that he had no intention of b~ilding more than his home. Our concern is evidenced by. the enclosed copy of a letter from our lawyer dated January 9, 1981. In reply to our concerns about marina expansion he states that as a pre-existing'non-conforming use, "opportunity for expansion or intensification would be extremely limited at best". We do not consider fifty percent expansion of docking and parking facilities to be "extremely limited". 2) We believ~ there is insufficient space for parking additional cars on the property and we are concerned that cars may be parked in areas not allocated for parking in Mr. Boos' plans. Indeed even in the past, marina patrons have parked their cars in the area we have marked in red on the enclosed map? This area is directly adjacent to our residential property~a~nd we believe'is included in the residential portion of Mr. Boos' property and is not allocated for pa~king in any of the previously approved plans nor in the proposed plan. If additional docks are built in th~s area, more patrons will certainly park there in order to be close to their boats, destroying the residential nature of the area. ..... Con't Chester H. Hochbaum Debra S. Cantor 20 Waterside Plaza New York, N.Y. 10010 Southold Town Board of Appeals Attention; Gerard P. Goehringer Chairman Main Road--State Road 25 Southold, L.I.N.Y. 11971 Re: Southold Town Board of Appeals i~pe~l No. 3201 Variance to Expand Marina Facilities February 8, 1984 Board of Appeal Town of Southold Dear Mr. Goehringer, As owners of the property directly adjacent to Broadwaters Cove Marina, we are opposed to the variance proposed by Mr. Norman Boos for expansion of the marina facilities for the following reasons; l) We call your attention to Southold Town Board of Appeals Action dated September 17, 1982 on Appeal No. 2914, a copy of which is enclosed. In order to gain a variance to the zoning ordinance to enable him to build his house, Mr. Boos requested permission to reduce the land area for the marina. Clearly the intention of the zoning Board in granting the Appeal was to increase residential use and limit marina expansion. Now, having gained permission to build the house, Mr. Boos wants to expand his marina property also. Possible expansion of the marina was a concern of o~fs eve~.before we purchased ou~ property. Before our purchase we asked Mr. Boos about his expansion plans and he told us that he had no intention of building more than his home. Our concern is evidenced by the enclosed copy of a letter from our lawyer dated January 9, 1981. In reply to our concerns about marina expansion he states that as a pre-existing'non-conforming use, "opportunity for expansion or intensification would be extremely limited at best". We do not consider fifty percent expansion of docking and parking facilities to be "extremely limited'~. 2) ~e believe there is insufficient space for parking additional cars on the property and we are concerned that cars may be parked in areas not allocated for parking in Mr. Boos' plans. Indeed even in the past, marina patrons have parked their cars in the area we have marked in red on the enclosed map? This area is diFectly adjacent to our residential property.~nd we believe'is included in the residential portion of Mr. Boos' property and is not allocated for paF~king in any of the previously approved plans nor in the proposed plan. If additional docks are built in th~$ area, more patrons will certainly park there in order to be close to their boats, destroying the residential nature of the area. ..... ConIt 3) We are concerned about possible effects of the proposed expansion on the safety of our child, ourselves, our neighbors and the rest of the community. The proposed expansion will surely bring an increase in automobile traffic on an already unsafe portion of Skunk Lane. There are blind curves on either side of the marina and speeding is commonplace on this road. Therefore, there is very poor visibility for cars entering or leaving the marina. We are also concerned about such a large increase in boat traffic. The marina is largely unsupervised and adding these docks will make navigation to and from the marina much more hazardous. In addition, the channel leading out of Broadwaters Cove is very narrow and, even in the past, there have been numerous groundings including some on our property where the channel leads into the marina. Our safety concerns are tensified because M~. Boos proposes to expand this marina, a commercial use in a residential area, even though there is no full-time supervision of the facility as Mr. Boos is normally present on weekends only. 4) Finally, we are opposed to this proposal because of the negative environ- mental impact we believe it will have on Broadwaters Cove and the wetlands in the area. All Boats must motor in and out of the marina, and a fifty percent increase in this traffic will cause increased gasoline and oil pollution in the cove, not to mention the increase in trash thrown or blown overboard. The lack (me maneuverability in the marina caused by proposed expansion might increase damage to the banks of the Wetlands. And the additional traffic in the channel leading out the marina passes directly through our property, jeopardizing the marshes at the edge of the water. We are also concerned with the lack of sewage f~cilities at the marina and the effects of raw untreated sewage disposed of directly into Broadwaters Cove on swimmers and natural wildlife. Please consider that the area surrounding Broadwaters Cove Marina is entirely residential in nature, and most of the residents believe that expansion of'~his commercial activity as proposed would be detrimental to the wellbeing of the entire'community. Indeed, we have supported Mr. Boos' previous proposals for variances needed to build his house, as residential development of the property was deemed a positive asset to the community. Thank you for your kind attention. Very ]:~uly~yours, _~-Chester H. Hochbauln Debra S. Cantor Southold Town.Board of Ap.eals MAIN ROAD ,.~TATE ROAD ,~.5 SOUTHE)LD, L I . N Y. 11971 ~OOS) ACTION OF THE ZO.~IIN(] BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 2914 Application Dated July 27, 1982 for a RehearLng TO: Stephen F. Griffing, Jr., Esq. (For Norma]~ C. 120 Court Street, P.O. Box 982 Riverhead, NY 11901 TELEPHONE (516i765 1809 [Appellant (s) ] At a Heeting of the Zoninc[ Board of Appeals held on September 16, ]982 the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was tel{eh on you~" [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for SpccJ ~1 Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section Request for Variance to the Zoning Ozdinance Article ] [ [ , Section ]00-31 ~tl. tl_le V, Section 100-51 [ ] Request fo]: The Pt:blic ReheauJng in ,.hl.s matte~' w~,s held on August t7, 1982. Rehearing in the [iatt.er ~,f the Application for NOI.~t!AN C. BOOS, One Cedar Str,.'.e~, Hassap~.qua, NY 117118, by Stephen F. S~lf~ing, Jr., Esq., for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Suction 100-31 and Article V, Section 100-51 fo~ permisstou to re.]kce !and area for existing marina by dividing premises into {we parcels, one as a marina and one for residential use, each having insufficient up]and area. f,ocation of Property: South side of Bay Avenue (a/k/a 8000 Skunk Lane), Cutchogue, NY; bounded north by Bay Avenue; west by Brickley; south by. Gross; ease by Hochhaum; more particularly [denti lied as Suffolk County Tax Mai. Dis- trict 1000, Section !04, Block 8, i.ot 2.1. This board by a unanimous vote agreed to review ;' ~ ,.~s original dec~sion in this Appeal. This matter was reheard au a reqular meeting el {:his board held ou August 17, 1982. At such reh~ aring, appellant pz'escnted new and further evidence, all of which is set forth :.;] the minutes of said rehearing. Based upon such new evidcr*c~, this board finds that st rict corapli- anco with the :zoning code .... ~ou~,~ resqlt in practical difficulties and, accordingly, grants the variance SU.3Jr.~.T, LOWEVr..R, TO TIIE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, to wit: ...... .. ·" 1. That the permission granted herein is o__nl_~. .~,;~- the ~o,,~r~..~'~zo, of on.e private one-family dwelling on the prentises (comprising 117,871 sguare feet of which 47,364 square feet are under water), it being speci- ! fically understood that the marina located on the premises shall never be considered a separate pnrcel of property, and the entire premises shall remain Jn one ownership, lin effect, this property shall not be peFmitted to be subdivided with the existing uses. ] 2. That a parking plan with a mini:rum of forty-three (43) spaces f~r the marina use shall be su[Anitted to and approved by pa~kJngthe - Planning Board. 3. That the new dwelling proposed to be constr'ucted by the appellant shall be located on t'he prcn':Js~_.s as indicat,::d on the map entitled, Br~advat~.s Cove Ma~J.n,~," ~hitialed by th.' Chairman on August 17, 1982; an~ ~].,,t th'~ consuruct:ior~ of said dwelling shall com- ply in all respects wi~h al ~ laws and r~les and ~:egu]a~ions applicable the re to. DATED: September 1'7, Form lB4 (rev. 12/81) (CONTINUED ON IA~,~ TWO) 1982. CIIAIR}b%N, SOUTHOLD i'Ob"N ZONING OF APPEAI,S BOARD McNULTY, (31LMARTIN, DiPIETRO, NESCI ~ HAEFELI Janaury 9, 1981 SO UTHA~*4 PTON OFFICE 320 HAIRPTON ROAD SOUTHAI~PTON. NEW YORK 119~8 Mr. Chester H. Hochbaum Miss Debra S. Cantor 20 Waterside Plaza Apartment 15D New York, NY 10010 Re: Cantor & Hochbaum from Wenk Dear Mr. Hochbaue and Dear Miss Cantor: In response to your letter please be advised, as follows: December 31, 1980, I have reveiwed the zoning map and ordinance of Southold town and also have spoken to the real estate broker and am satisfied that your property and the adjacent parcel in question are both zoned residential. The marina that is on the adjacent property is a pre-existing, non-conforming use and, as such, any opportunity for expansion or intensification would be extremely limited at best. Southold Town Board of Appeals Attention: Charles Grigonis, Jr. Main Road-State Road 25 Southold, L.I.N.Y. 11971 Chester FI. Hochbaum Debra S. Cantor 20 Waterside Plaza New York, N.Y. 10010 February 8, 1984 Re: Southold Town Board of Appeals Appeal No. 3201 Variance to Expand Marina Facilities Dear Mr. Grigonis, As owners of the property directly adjacent to Broadwaters Cove Marina, we are opposed to the variance proposed by Mr. Norman Boos for expansion of the marina facilities for the following reasons; l) We call your attention to Southold Town Board of Appeals Action dated September 17, 1982 on Appeal No. 2914, a copy of which is enclosed. In order to gain a variance to the zoning ordinance to enable him to build his house, Mr. Boos hequested permission to reduce the land area for the marina. Clearly the intention of the zoning Board in granting the Appeal was to increase residential use and limit marina expansion. Now, having gained permission to build the house, Mr. Boos wants to expand his marina property also. Possible expansion of the marina was a concern of oUFs even-before we purchased ou~ property. Before our purchase we asked Mr. Boos about his expansion plans and he told us that he had no intention of b~ilding more than his home. Our concern is evidenced by the enclosed copy of a letter from our lawyer dated January 9, 1981. In reply to our concerns about marina expansion he states that as a pre-existing non-conformin§ use, "opportunity for expansion or intensification would be extremely limited at best". We do not consider fifty percent expansion of docking and parking facilities to be "extremely i~mited~'. 2) We believe there is insufficient space for parking additional cars on the property and we are concerned that cars may be parked in areas not allocated for parking in Mr. Boos' plans. Indeed even in the past, marina patrons .have parked their cars in the area we'have marked in red on the enclosed map~ This area is directly adjacent to our residential property~nd we believFis included in the residential portion of Mr. Boos' property and is not allocated for pamking in any of the previously approved plans nor in the proposed plan. If additional docks are built in this area, more patrons will certainly park there in order to be close to their boats, destroying the residential nature of the area. ..... Co~'t 3) We are concerned about possible effects of the proposed expansion on the safety of our child, ourselves, our neighbors and the rest of the community. The proposed expansion will surely bring an increase in automobile traffic on an already unsafe portion of Skunk Lane. There are blind curves on either side of the marina and speeding is commonplace on this road. Therefore, there is very poor visibility for cars entering or leaving the marina. We are also concerned about such a large increase in boat traffic. The marina is largely unsupervised and adding these docks will make navigation to and from the marina much more hazardous. In addition, the channel leading out of Broadwaters Cove is very narrow and, even in the past, there have been numerous groundings including some on our property where the channel leads into the marina. Our safety concerns are tensified because Mr. Boos proposes to expand this marina, a commercial use in a residential area, even though there is no full-time supervision of the facility as Mr. Boos is normally present on weekends only. 4) Finally, we are opposed to this proposal because of the negative environ- mental impact we believe it will have on Broadwaters Cove and the wetlands in the area. All Boats must motor in and out of the marina, and a fifty percent increase in this traffic will cause increased gasoline and oil pollution in the cove, not to mention the increase in trash thrown or blown overboard. The lack ~ maneuverability in the marina caused by proposed expansion might increase damage to the banks of the Wetlands. And the additional traffic in the channel leading out the marina passes directly through our property, jeopardizing the marshes at the edge of the water. We are also concerned with the lack of sewage f~cilities at the marina and the effects of raw untreated sewage disposed of directly into Broadwaters Cove on swimmers and natural wildlife. Please consider that the area surrounding Broadwaters Cove Marina is entirely residentia~ in nature, and most of the residents believe that expansion of'~his commercial activity as proposed would be detrimental to the wellbeing of the entire'community. Indeed, we have supported Mr. Boos' previous proposals for variances needed to build his house, as residential development of the property was deemed a positive asset to the community. Thank you for .your kind attention. Very truly yours, ~ster H. Hochbaum Debra S. C~tor McNULTY, OILMARTIN, D~PIETRO, NESCI & HAEFELI Janaury 9, 1981 Mr. Chester H. Hochbaum Miss Debra S. Cantor 20 Waterside Plaza Apartment 1 5D New York, NY 10010 Re: Cantor & Hochbaum from Wenk Dear Mr. Hochbaue and Dear Miss Cantor: In response to your letter o~ December 31, please be advised, as ~ollows: 1980, I have reveiwed the zoning map and ordinance o~ Southold town and also have spoken to the real estate broker and am satisfied that your property and the adjacent parcel ~n question are both zoned residential. The marina that is on the adjacent property is a pre-existing, non-conforming use and, as such, any opportunity for expansion or intensi~ication would be extremely limited at best. 5 February 1984 Arnold M. Behrer, Jr. P.O. Box 912 Clinton, 5outh Carolina 29325 Board of Appeals Town of Southold $outhold, New York 11971 Dear Sir: Despite the above address, I am a Yankee, own property at Nassau Point, and am very much a citizen of that area. For at least ten years I have kept my boat at the Broadwaters Marina, even before it had that name and had become the beautifully planned and operated unit that it has become. It is a credit to a man of vision and tremendous vitality and industry. At no time has there been any characteristic of this installation which can be interpreted as a detriment to the area in which it exists. As a matter of fact, the proprietor has constructed a magnificent house to be his living quarters immediately adjacent to the marina. I have been aware of resistance to the development of this property for some time. Various excuses have been introduced to prevent its progress. Certainly problems with adequate parking space cannot logically be a legitimate objection. ! have never seen the space provided even challenged. I believe that the community can safely allow Mr. Boos to build additional slips for small boats without worry. A successful venture to the extent that I understand this is to be expanded cannot but benefit the community. It is therefor suggested that permission be granted to Mr. Boos to complete the installation according to his plans. Should you wish to contact me, my telephone number is 803-833-5476. RADIOLOGY DIPLOMA'rE AMERICAN ~OARD OF RADIOLOgy Haywaters Drive R. R. #1 Box 59 Cutcbogue, NY 11935 February 20, 1984 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Res Application of Norman C. Boos - 10/28/83 D~ar Sirs As thirty year residents of Broadwaters Cove, Cutchogue, we would like to go on record as bei~ strongly opposed to any further expansion of Broadwaters Cove Marina as requested by Mr. Boos. In 1978 the zoning Board of Appeals set limits for the operation of this marina property. If the new owner. Mr. Boos, feels, as he stated at the Board of Trustee meetir~g last October, that he cannot make enough money with the marina at its present size, let him r~ise his mooring fees, and not further commercialize and polute these beautiful waters of Broadwaters Cove. We therefore request that you deny Mr. Boos' applica- tion for expansion of his marina. Yours truly, Arthur F. Schmitz VirgiRla A. Schmitz we, the undersigned, James Reale, Michelena Reale, Angelo Petrucci, Georgette Petrucci live on Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane), Cutchogue directly across the road frcm Broadwater Cove Marina owned by Norman C. Boos. Norman C. Boos has applied to the Trustees to construct a floating catwalk with nine fingers for eighteen more boats in the Broadwater Cove Marina channel. This will obstruct free navigation and be very hazardous to the marina's navigation. Let us not lose sight of the fact that this marina is in a residential area and is a nonconforming zoned piece of property (not zoned for business). We feel at this time that the marina is operating at its full capacity of thirty five boats as the Southold Town Board of Appeals letter dated June 1, 1978 states and Mr. Boos was well aware of what he bought. The additional fingers or slips increasing the amount of boats stored in this marina would congest and would add additional traffic on an already busy, narrow road and the only road leading in and out of Nassau Point, creating noise and rubbish on the road. There is no parking area for eighteen more boats except on the road not to mention the depreciation of the real estate properties in our area. When launching boats it creates a traffic back up and is a hazzard because boats being launched need the ccmplete width of Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane). The increase in boats stored in this dead end marina with people sleeping on board overnight certainly has to create problems on water pollution and the envirerm~nt. We hope the Planning Board, Board of Appeals, Building Department and Trustees will take these above facts under consideration when making their decisions. We w~uld appreciate your notifying us whenever this matter ccrnes before the Southold Town Board of Appeals so that we can express our opinion on this matter at those meetings. Southold Southold Southold Building Building Building Building Southold Southold Town Supervisor Francis J. Murphy Town Attorney Robert W. Tasker Town Clerk Judith T. Terry Dept. E~cutive Administrator Victor Lessard Inspector George Fisher Inspector Curtis Horton Inspector Edward Hindermann Town Planning Board Chairman Henry Raynor & Members Town Appeals Board Chairman Gerard Goehringer & Members Southold Town Trustees Chaizman & Members President Nassau Point Association President Nassau Farms Association President Broadwater Cove Association B~R0 ADIYATER S COVE proposed work notpd ...... APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ROEERT W. GILIISPIE, JR,, CHAIRMAN ROBERT BERGEN CHARLES GRIGONIS. JR. t~EHGE DOYEN, JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals ~.q~ OUTHOLO, L. I., N.Y. 11=J'71 June 1, 1978 TELEPHONE765,~ 1802 Norman C. Boos Bought Mr. Angelo Petrucci Marina August 23, 1978 Mr. Angelo G. Petrucci Bay Avenue Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Petrucci: As you know, your business on the south side of Bay Avenue, Cutchogue, New York, is classified as a non-conforminq marina or boat bas%n. ,. ~ccordin~ to our ~re~.nt Zonin~'brdinancef a non-conformin~ use is any use, whether of a building or tract of land, or both, exist&rig on the effective date of the zoning ordinance, which does not conform to the use regulations of the district in which it is located. The definition of a marina is any premises containing one (1) or more piers, wharves, docks, moorings, bulkheads, buildings, slips, basins or lands under water, designed, used or intended to be used primarily for the docking or mooring of boats, for or without compensation. Using your letter of May 17, 1978, and the above definitions as a guide, it.seems to us that_v~ur non-conformin~ marina i~cludes the fo__l, lowin~: Th~ Seasonal op~at~n of a marina or boat basin wit~ docks or s~&ps for not more than thirty-five (35) non-commercial boats not more than 2~ fee~t in length. Spec[a£ services ~or owners suc~ as ~res~ water, electrlclty, oil and gasoline are also permitted. We think that this service barge is an integral part of your marina operation and may be stored on your property when not in use. You are not ~ermitted to store boats~ build boats or conduct the retail sale of boats on your premises. Hopefully, this clearly defines all permitted uses for your property. If there are any other questions, please bring them to our attention.  very ly, CHAIRMAN ~ RWG:bcc cc: Mr. Charles Grigonis Mr. Edward F. Hinderman Southold Town Board o£Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE: ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11cj'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 2914 Application Dated July 27, 1982 for a Rehearing TO: Stephen F. Griffing, Jr., Esq. (For Norman C. 120 Court Street, P.O. Box 982 Riverhead, NY 11901 Boos) [Appellant(s)] [ ] [ ] The Public Rehearing in At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on September 16, 1982 ' the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31 Article V, Section 100-51 Request for this matter was held on August 17, 1982. Rehearing in the Matter of the Application for NORMAN C. BOOS, One Cedar Street, Massapequa, NY 11758, by Stephen F. Griffing, Jr., Esq., for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Article V, Section 100-51 for permission to reduce land area for existing marina by dividing premises into two parcels, one as a marina and one'for residential use, each having insufficient upland area. Location of Property: South side of Bay Avenue (a/k/a 8000 Skunk Lane), Cutchogue, NY; bounded north by Bay Avenue; west by Brickley; south by Gross; east by Hochbaum; more particularly identified as Suffolk County Tax Map Dis- trict 1000, Section 104, Block 8, Lot 2.1. This board by a unanimous vote agreed to review its original decision in this Appeal. This matter was reheard at a regular meeting of this board held on August 17, 1982. At such rehearing, appellant presented new and further evidence, all of which is set forth in the minut~ 'of Raid r~hearing. Based upon such new evidence, this board finds that strict compli- ance with the zoning code would result in practical difficulties and, accordingly, grants the variance SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO THE FOLLOWING CONDIT~I~O~S, to wit: .' 1. That the permission granted herein is onlv for the constructioucti ~ one private one-family dwelling on the premises (comprisin~ 117~8~°~. square feet of which 47,364 square feet are under water], it being speci- fically understood that the marina located on the premises shall never be considered a separate parcel of property, and the entire premises shall remain in one ownership, lin effect, this property shall not be permitted to be subdivided with the existing uses.] 2. That a parkinq plan with a minimum of forty-three (431 parkin~ spaces for the marina use shall be submitted to and approve~ by the Planning Board. 3. That the new dwelling proposed to be constructed by the appellant shall be located on the premises as indicated on the map entitled, "Broadwaters Cove Marina," initialed by the Chairman on August 17, 1982; and that the construction of said dwelling shall com- ply in all respects with all laws and rules and regulations applicable thereto. DATED: September 17, Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) 1982. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Page 2 - Appeal No. 2914 Rehearing: Norman C. Boos Decision Rendered September 16, 1982 Location of Property: South side of Bay Avenue, Cutchogue, NY; more particularly identified as Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-104- 8-2.1. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. Absent was: Member Doyen (Fishers Island). This resolution was unanimously adopted. RECEIVED AND FILED BY Tt~ $OUTHOLD TO¥~'N CLE~RK DATE ~7~~2 HOUR ~- ~e~ . ^ Roadrunners ~a~l Cal~ Jan. 17, 1984 Mr. Gerry Goehringer Board of Appeals Town Hall $outhold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Goehringer~ I wish to oppose Mr. Boos' application of 10/23/83 to increase the capacity of his marina on Bay Ave., Cutchogue. Residents of this area have, for many years, enjoyed clamming, gathering oysters, scallops, etc., in these waters, with the assurance that the creeks in our area were clean and unpolluted. The enlargement of Mr. Boos' marina would bring in more boats, polluting our waters with oil plus the debris which may be cast from the boats by the owners. I, therefore, request, that Mr. Boos' application to increase the capacity of his marina be turned down. Si~_ncerely yo~urs, (Mrs. L. J. Payen) 225 Haywaters Dr. Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 Mr. Gerry Goehringer Board Of Appeals Town Nail Southold NY 11971 Joan Langemyr 64 Oak Drive Broad Wa£ers Cove Cutchogue, New York January 4, 1984 Re; Application of Norman C. goos, 10128/83 Dear Mr. Scoutaaburgh, appllcotlon of Mr. goos which was submitted om October 28, 1983. A letter from tba previouo owner, A~elo mitt~ CO gh~ So~thold Tow~ Board, clearly ex~laina cha number of boaC~ ~haC can be moored in chis marina. I cannot see why the board ~bould change their decision now Fo pleas~ Mr. goos. If he ia having financial difficulties, bis problem should not be the problem of ~ha raaidents surrounding rhm marina. During the time Mr. Boos was dredging, we. called the Environmental Department and the dredging ceased for a period of time. Shortly, thereafter, dredging began tha result of some political maneuvering? Tho noise we were subject go at that rime wan very I do hops you will give evary conslderaClou Fo the denial of Mr. Boos application la view of Fha over-whelmln~ negative viewpoint of the local rcaidants. Wishing you o Happy Haw Year. Sincerely, Lea e ' g myr, President ~road WaFers Cove A~sociation Joan Langemyr 64 Oak Drive Broad Waters Cove Cutchogue, New York January 4, 1984 11935 Mr. Paul Stoutenburg, President Board of Town Turstaes Town Hall Main Road Southold, Naw York 11971 Re: Application of Norman C. Boos, 10/28/83 Dear Mr. Stoutenburgh, I, like many of the Broad Waters Cove residents, oppose the application of Mr. Boos which was submitted on October 28, 1983. A letter from the previoup owner, Angelo Petrucci, that was sub- mitred to the Southold Town Board, clearly explains the number of boats that can be moored in this marina. I cannot see why the board should change their decision now to please Mr. Boos. If he is having financial difficulties, his problem should not be the : problem of the residents surrounding the marina. During the time Mr. Boos was dredging, we. called the Environmental Department and the dredging ceased for a period of time. Shortly, thereafter, dredging began again. Could this be the result of some political maneuvering? The noise we were subject to at that time was very disturbing. I do hope you will give every consideration to the denial of Mr. Boos application in view of the over-whelping negative viewpoint of the local residents. Wishing you a Happy New Year. Sincerely, Jo~.n Langemyr, Presid'&nt Broad Waters Cove ~soctation January 18th, 1984 Mrs. Joan M. Langemyr, President Broadwaters Cove Association Cutchogue, New York, 11935 Dear Joan: Resarding the Application for NORMAN C. BOOS FOR construction of 175 lin. ft. of floating walk with nine fingers each approximately 16' long to accommodate additional dockage for 18 small boats; We, the undersigned, C~ARENCE AND MARY BELZ,, living on the corner of Mason and Broadwters Drive, are very much against the approval of thus application. The present marina is in a residential area and is a nonconforming zoned p&ece of property (not zoned for business). The additional fingers or slips increasing the amount of boats stored in this marina would congest and would add additional traffic on an already busy,narrow road and the only road leading in and out of Nassau Point, creating noise and rubbish on the road. There is no parking area for eighteen more boats except on the road not to mention the depreciation of t he real estate properties in our area. When launching boats it create~ a traffic back up and is a hazard because boats being launched need the complete width of Skunk Lane. The increase in boats stored in this dead end marina with people sleeping on board overnight certainly has to create problems on wat~rpollution and the environment. We hope the Planning Board, Board of Appeals, Building Department and Trustees will take these above facts under con- sideration when making their decisions. Sincerely yours, January 12, 1984 Mr. Gerry Goehringer Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, N. Y. 11971 re: Norman C. Boos Broadwaters Cove Marina Dear Mr. Goehringer, An application by the subjec~t has been tabled pending some action by the Building Deparltment. The application is for a permit to enlarge the capacity of this little marina by about fifty per cent. On June 1, 1978, the Board of Appeals set forth, in writing, to the former owner exactly what was permitted at this marina and the present owner purchased the property with the full knowledge of what he was buying. Sitting as I do on a similar Board in a Village government I can appreciate the pressures that are visited upon you in situations such as this. I am sure that you will agree that the decisions of your Board should be made for the "good of the public" rather than the individual. The public in this case are many people in the area who are all concerned with the loss of their peace and tranquility by the increase in the number of people, cars and boats in our residential area. This marina sits on residential, not commercial property. It is a non-conforming use and certainly should not be expanded to the detriment of the residential community. Any expansion of this marina will, in my opinion, make a mockery of our zoning laws and I ask that your Board not permit any further expansion. Yours trul~ Jack D. Reamer 1315 Mason Drive Broadwaters Cove Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 JDR/lmh January 12, 1984 Mr. Gerry Goehringer Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, N. Y. 11971 re: Norman C. Boos Broadwaters Cove Marina Dear Mr. Goehringer, An application by the subject has action by the Building Department. permit to enlarge the capacity of fifty per cent. been tabled pending some The application is for a this little marina by about On June 1, 1978, the Board of Appeals set forth, in writing, to the former owner exactly what was permitted at this marina and the present owner purchased the property with the full knowledge of what he was buying. Sitting as I do on a similar Board in a Village government I can appreciate the pressures that are visited upon you in situations such as this. I am sure that you will agree that the decisions of your Board should be made for the "good of the public" rather than the individual. The public in this case are many people in the area who are all concerned with the loss of their peace and tranquility by the increase in the number of people, cars and boats in our residential area. This marina sits on residential, not commercial property. It is a non-conforming use and certainly should not be expanded to the detriment of the residential community. Any expansion of this marina will, in my opinion, make a mockery of our zoning laws and I ask that your Board not permit any further expansion. Jack D. Reamer 1315 Mason Drive Broadwaters Cove Cutehogue, N. Y. 11935 JDR/lmh 58 Haywaters Drive Post Office Box 617 Cutchogue, New York December 30, 1983 11935 Mr. Gerry Goehringer Board Of Appeals Town Nail Southold NI 11971 Re: Application of Norman C. Boos, 10/28/83 De~. Mm. Stoutenburgh: When I first decided to write this letter I began to mentally compile a - list of reasons why the permit sought by Mr. Boos should not be granted. It occurred to me, however, that no list of reasons ought to be required, nor should there 'be required a long list of interested persons opposed to the granting of the permit. Ail that should be required is this statement: I, as an individual with a demonstrable interest in the area, do not want the permit to be granted. The June 1, 1978, letter of the Southold Town Board of Appeals to Mr. Angelo Petrucci very clearly defines the limits within which the marina property is to be operated. The statement by the Board was made not only to Mr. Petrucci but to the interested public, and presumably it represents a certain commit- ment on the part of the Board. ~. Boos now seeks to expand the use of the property beyond the indicated limits for his personal profit and at the expense of an impact upon the area and the comnunity. I seek, by urgently requesting that the application be denied, tohmintainundiminished that store of envi~mmental qualities which ied me to purchase a home in the area. '.~ It would seem appropriate for Southo!d to again be first, this time in deciding that the existing relative quiet and solitude ~Crtichmake the North Fork so unique, and which are of great value to at least a single resident, are no less important to the comity as a whole than the aggrandizement of another single resident through further concessions which impinge in any degree upon that quiet and solitude. Yours truly, pip cc Mr. Victor Lessard, Building Department Mrs. Joan Langemyr, Broadwaters Cove Association~ Box 617 NoJ{ York TEL. 51~-765-3232 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 January 30, 1984 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Street Southold, N.Y. 11971 Gentlemen: Albertson Marine services many boats at Broadwater Cove Marina and we see the need to the community for additional slips. Being in the same type of business we cannot acco~auodate all the people looking for slips in this area. In addition, the alternative to bo~ts docked at a safe controlZed marina, as apposed to being moured in the creek or in the bay where them is no control. Sincerely y~urs, E. -W~A~e INC. January 14, 198~'~ $outhold Town Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York l~97~ Dear Members of the Board: As residents of Cutchogue and customers for the past two years of the Broadwaters Cove Marina we would like to add our whole-hearted support to Mr. Boos' application for the expansion of his facilities. We suspect that the major issues, pro and con, have been voiced by this point but hope that some of our personal experiences and observations may help shed a positive light on the question. 1. Availability of slip space at the marina, the only such facility for several miles in either direction, was the determining factor in our decision to recommission our power boat after five years in storage as we were beyond the stage where we wanted to be concerned about an unattended boat moored in the Bay. Boat expenditures, as is well documented, are considerable and in our case have resulted in nearly $3,000 in revenues to local canvas makers, mechanics, boat movers, marine supply stores, gas docks, and insurance agents in two years. In short, pleasure boating is good business for the Southold Town economy. 2. We have frequently remarked that even on prime weekends the marina is surprisingly full of unused boats and noticeably void of signs of humanity. 3. We do not own an automobile and seem to be only one of many boaters dropped off at the marina with the land chauffeur then driving off for points unknown. This pattern is most common with Mr. Boos' teenaged client-navigators which age group seems to be the majority in Cutchogue's boating population. -2- Parking is, in our opinion, a non-issue. We recall only once last summer when the area along the road seemed to be filled to capacity although it appeared that one could have then easily found space in the parking area closer to ~r. Boos' house. 4. The marina is a neighborhood facility and its pattern of usage differs from some of the larger commercial facilities in the area. It appears that most boat owners have residences locally which serve as the focal points for weekend social gatherings and entertaining rather than the dockside entertaining which is more common with the owners of large craft at some of the marinas which accomodate those sorts of boats, again suggesting that conventional parking capacity standards do not apply. 5. We have never seen evidence that anyone is living aboard a boat, except for Norman himself. Most of the boats are simply too small. It is unusual, in fact, for anyone to linger any longer than is necessary to handle the details of getting underway or closing up the boat. Ail of us need to be concerned with the over- development of the North Fork and we favor the careful review of proposals such as this. It is important that in this issue the nature of the marina's use patterns be carefully examined. It is not a conventional heavy use facility. Norman has developed a facility which is aesthetically pleasing, properly maintained, well managed, and an asset to the community. In our opinion the addition of 18 more slips will not degrade the area by resuming in a congested facility. We strongly recommend your approval of the proposed expansion. Our fellow boaters need dock space. P.O. Box 57 Cutchogue Long Island, N.Y. 11935-0001 1-212-292-3590 1/2~/84 Southold Zoning Board Gentlemen The u,~mber of boat slips at Broadwaters Cove r,~rina should be increased if for no other reason that to provide more docking space for local boatowners. Because of its current limited size many boaters in the Nassau Point area are unable to use this facility. This facility is a real asset to our community and it should be available to as many people as possible. It is well maintained, the grounds and parking facilities are attractive and more than ample to handle any planned increase in the number of cars using it. I have kept my boat this this marina for a number of years and would strongly resent any move to deprive local boaters of an opportunity to avail themselves of this facility. Len Trapidd Carrington Road Nassau Point P.O. Box 214 Indian Neck Lane Peconic, New York January 24, 1984 Mr. J. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York Dear Mr. Goehringer: I am a year-round resident of Southold residing on Indian Neck Lane. I have moored my sailboat at the Broadwater Cove Marina for the past three years. During these years, I have found this marina to be one of the most efficiently run marinas I know of. The atmosphere is one that is quiet and extremely clean, both at the dock and surrounding waters. This atmosphere most certainly conforms with the surrounding residential area. I find the parking facilities to be more than adequate. For these reasons, I am in favor of Mr. Boos' request to expand. He is to be complimented on running a very efficient operation which serves the community and affords local residents the opportunity to safely moor their boats. In closing, let me say that I have a waterfront home, but I choose to moor my boat at the Broadwater Cove Marina because it is run so efficiently. Thank you. Peter D. ~li jv DR. FELIX ROSS PALMERI DR. JULES S. GREENBERG 828 HEMPSTEAD TURNPIKE FRANKLIN .SQUARE, NEW YORK January 17, 1984 To whom it may conoernl It h~s come to my attention that an objection has been raised about the expansion of the marina at Broadwater's Cove. I have been a boat tenant since the inception of that facility. I think Mr. Boos should be complimented on ta~ing what was an eye- sore location and steadily improved and enhanced the appearance of that same location, to a point which is now an asset to the road leading to Nassau Point. The objection that has been raised about the new proposed finger slips is totally ridiculous. There is more than a~ple room and space for any size craft to come in and out of the marina. Respectfully submitted, Dr. F. R. Palmeri January 13, 1984 $outhhold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southhold, NY 11971 Gentlemen: We have a residence on Sterling Road, Cutchogue, located just around the corner (about a 4-5 minute walk) from the Broadwaters Cove Marina on Skunk Lane, (Bay Avenue), Cutchogue. It has come to our attention that the Owners and operators of the Marina, Mr. and Mrs. Norman Boos, want to make better use of their Marina property by adding some slips to the existing location. It is surprising to learn that their attempts to improve the area and provide expanded and better service and docking facilities are meeting with resistance from some of the other local residents. We have enjoyed our home in Cutchogue for nearly two years and have had the pleasure of docking our small boat in the Broadwaters Cove Marina for the past two sum~ers and it is our intention to continue. It was not too difficult to learn that the original marina was in disrepair and not in keeping with the fine area. Since Mr. and Mrs. Boos have taken over the marina a few years back, many, many improvements have been made and maintained. The general housekeeping is impeccable, and the arrangements they have made for parking has ensured that everyone who needsto park their ~ car at the marina can be done off the main street, Skunk Lane. (Previously, cars would have to be loaded/unloaded and parked directly on the road.) Anyway, our experience during the past two sum~ers has been nothing but excellent. Even on the busiest of days, we have always been able to easily find a parking space (if we didn't walk - as many of the marina users do). There has always been adequate facilities for refuse and all the people (of all ages) have always been considerate and helped police the area to keep up the standards that Mr. and Mrs. Boos have established. Interestingly enough, Mr. and Mrs. Boos have thought so much of the area and their marina that they have been building (themselves) a fine residence on the immediately adjacent lot to the marina and I understand that it will be finished and they will be able to move in within the next couple of months. I am certain that the Board will take all facts into consideration when making a final decision but also trust that due consideration is given to Mr. and Mrs. Boos' request and the increase in revenue that they may be able to realize, however slight - for whatever increased number of slips eventually allowed. Full time supervision right on the premises is an advantage that, in most cases, is i/m~easureable. Sou~hhold Town Board of Appeals Page 2 January 13, 1984 In short, we feel that, being residents of the area, having Broadwaters Cove Marina in our neighborhood, with its fine standards and facilities, is a definite asset, and that the moderate expansion plans will also prove to be an invaluable asset. My wife, Beverly, and I would be happy to discuss this further and please feel free to call me at work if you so desire (516 - 944-3500). ? / / To Whom It Msy Concern: January 16,1984 I am a resident of Nassau Point, have been for eight years, and also a tenant of Broadwaters Cove for the past two years. In the years that I have been passing the marina on my way to and from home, I have observed and commented about how Mr. Boos has been constantly improving the appearance of the grounds and the structure of the marina. As a tenant I can honestly state that the grounds are maintained meticulously and his parking facilities are excellent. It is for the above reasons that I decided to dock my boat at Mr~ Boos' marina and with God's help, hope to continue to enjoy his facilities. Sincerely, / Harold Winters / STANLEY J. KEATING, J~., ~. D. January 15, 1984 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re~ Broadwaters Cove Marina Dear Sirs: I am advised that an application for facility expansion is presently before you. It is my desire to support the owner's request on the grounds that the marina provides a needed service to the area, that the owner has landscaped and generally upgraded his property to improve services to users and enhanced the surrounding area with an altogether appropriate and aesthetically pleasing facility. Allegations of illegal waste dumping into the cove, illegal overnighting on boats, parking difficulties, and traffic congestion are totally without foundation in my experience. Thank you for allowing me to express my thoughts on this matter. Your consideration is appreciated. Sincerely: HaywatersY-~anding Road ~,.,~ Cutchogue, New York 71. A ~4 ' ~ A .