Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-55.-2-24.2 REC.;JVED .~Uhl -i. 4 ~84 SAMUEL J. (~LICKMAN dUN J. 4 1984 June 13, 1984 Mrs. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: Change of zone petition #262 ~¢conic County Miniature Rail Road Co., Ltd. Thank you for your June 8th correspondence in this matter. Please consider this letter a formal request to withdraw the pending application. Sincerely yours, JUDITll T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL ~1 \IISFICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 14, 1984 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Samuel J. Glickman, Esq. 114 Main Street Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Mr. Glickman: I am in receipt of your letter of June 13, 1984 withdrawing pending Petition No. 262 for a Change of Zone by Peconic County Miniature Rail Road Co., I_td. You may consider said petition withdrawn as of this date. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Town Cler~ Southotd DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE LEE E, KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING June 7, 1984 Ms. Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold 53095 Main Rd. - P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Application of "Peconic County Miniature Rail Road Co. Ltd." (#262) for a change of zone from "A" Agricultural and Residential and "B-i" General Business to "B-i" General Business, Town of Southold (SD-84~7). Dear Ms. Terry: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on June 6, 1984 re- viewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation Resolved to disapprove it because of the following: It is inconsistent with the Town of Southold Development Plan which designates this area for agricultural-single family residence de- velopment; 2. It constitutes the unwarranted encroachment of business zoning in- to a Residence District; It would tend to establish a precedent for further deep lot down- zonings in the locale along Middle Road (C.R, 48) adversely affect- ing the safety and traffic carrying capacity of said facility. 4. It would tend to adversely affect vehicular circulation patterns ~ along C.R. 48; and 5. There appears to be ample available business zoned land in the sur- sounding area. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director/f Planning ~.~erald G. NeWman Chief Planner Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 24,1984 Judith Terry, TOwn Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic County Miniature Rail Road, Co. Ltd change of zone petition Dear Mrs. Terry: After review of the file for the above mentioned application at the regular meeting of May 21, 1984 and a field inspection of same prior to the meetin~ the Planning Board took the following action. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Southold Town Board that the application for a change of zone in Southold for the Peconic County Miniature Rail Road, Co. Ltd. be denied as it does not conform with the present or proposed Master Plan for Southold Town. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JRo , CHAIRMAN B~yDi~a~UTHOLD TOWN PLANNING DOARD JUDITH T. TERRY TO~VN CLERK REGISTRAROI VII'AL$I \iISI[CS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 25, :1984 tAPR r9 34 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Mr. Henry Ii!. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Dear Henry: Transmitted herewith is petition of Peconic County Miniature Rail Road Co., Ltd. requesting a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-l" General Business District on certain' property located on the northerly side of County Route 48, opposite Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said' petition and determine the area so affected with your recommenda- tions. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachment CASE NO: ...~.~..~.2... STATE OF NEW YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED A, ',~ '.!. i ~,~84 '!~,,,~t! Ch k ~' ' ' PE~ON IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF PEC0NIC COUNTY MINIATURE RAIL ROAD CO. ,L~D. FOR A CT{ANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDIN- ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: P~GC~IC G0079TY MINIATt~E ~ ROAD O0.,LTD., ~. x ~, .~..u..~. ~.?..T ~. ~. ,~~t 40 ~u~ ~., ~=~,~ (ixmert name of petitioner) is Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned,X~m the owner of certain real property situated at Southold, NewY~k ~-.,i,~..~.~,,_~,..~,~...~..~ , ~ %?~ ~ ~w,: ~1 is ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J~ of ~ a~li~. Pl~ ~ ~ ~ at~~ ~ ~i~ V~ ~1, P.C. , ~m~, 10, 1984. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, Cha~lqi~ ~;gzx~ ~a~ he~;etofore made ~ par~ thereof, as. follows: ~-,, ~ne zc~e ~n-~n~c~ r~ae soutl'lerly part of the premises presently lies. · 3. Such request is made for the followin, g reasons: . Applicant plans ~o install and operate a mird~tm-e razl road c~ the pmmuises be set ~ack x~rth of the northerly line of County Road 48, and not follow the perimetar of the p~-~;~ses alcmg that line. To dmange the A zoned part of the Frank A. Field STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) Frank A. Field ...... . ........................ . ......... BEING DULY S%VORN, deposes and says that he is t~ie petitioner in the ~xith~n action; that he has read the foregoing Petition and kno~vs the contents thereof; that the same is true to hi~) own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters he believes it to be true. Frank A. Field Sworn to before me this [./.~Z~day of ............ ~., ~.... .................. ~.~N.~t~.r~ ~. ' TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of PECONIC OOUNTY MINIATURE RAIL ROAD CO,, LTD to the Town Board of the Town of $outhold. TO: John H. Carroll and wife Box 295 Southold, N.Y. 11971 C.F. Van Duzer Gas Service~Inc. ~4iddle Rd. Southold, N.Y. 11971 Gary E. Davis Blue Marlin Dr. Box 387 Southold,N.Y. 11971 Matthew Gierak 35 Oak Street Centereach, N.Y. 11720 Richard H. Wheeler 1215 Tuthill Rd. Southold, N.Y. BDger V. Kaller Middle Rd. Southold, N.Y. 11971 NOTICE 11971 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to request a C~anqe of zone fran A to B-I 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des-x cribed as follows: See attached. The parcel in question is that white ~r~ of th~r.'~.~rc~l 3 n~i-1 ~n~ h~m,~ily '~n 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: B-1 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Off.ice at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of sUCh hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: 3/17/84 P~CONIC ~~OAD CO., LTD. PetitionerFrank A. Field, President Post Office.Address: 40 Middleton Rd. Greenport, 'N.Y. 11944 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTIC.E_ ADDRESS_ AME ;. F. Van Duzer Gas Service, IHc. ]ary E. Davis ~atthew Gierak RichardJ~heeler Roger V. Kaller Box 295, Southold, N.Y. Middle Rd. Southold, N.Y. Blue Marlin Dr. Box 387, Southold,NY 35 Oak St. Centereach, N.Y. 11720 1215 Tuthill Rd., Seuthold, NY Middle Rd., Southold, N~Y. STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: SS.: Virqinia Maqinn , residing at Mattituck, N.Y~ ,. , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the l//-~day of ~.~)~,,'A.~ ,19 84 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth °n the reverse side hereof, directed ~6 each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at ~n~, N.Y. (~) mail. .;that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) ia Maginn U Sworn to m~,this //~ day of ~.)~). ,'? , 19 84 Notary Public All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of the Middle Road, which point is the southeast corner of land now or formerly of Kaller frc~ said point of beginning, Running thence North 39°39'30"'West 150 feet to an iron pipe; RUNNING THENCE South 50o22'00'' West 55.0 feet to a concrete monu~nent; RUNNING THS~CE South 52022'20'' West 93.35 feet to a concrete monument and land now or formerly of Wheeler; RUStlING THENCE ~South 55o32'40'' West 140.01 feet to a concrete monument and land now or formerly of Hoffmann: RUNNING THENCE South 59°21 '00" West 140.01 feet to a concrete monument and land now or formerly of Davis; RUNNING THENCE South 62005'40'' West 61.99 feet to a concrete mon~nent; RUNNING THENCE South 79015'00'' West 126.93 feet to a concrete mon~nent and land now or formerly of Van Duzer; RUNNING THENCE North 10o53'50'' West 450.43 feet to land now or formerly of Carroll; RU~ING THENCE North 79o15'00'' East 625.34 feet to a concrete mon%m~ent and other land of Carroll; RUNNING THENCE South 7o08'00'' East 30.35 feet to a concrete monument; RUNNING THENCE along other land of Carroll South 87049'50'' East 414.30feet to a concrete monument and the northerly side of Middle Read. THENCE westerly along the said northerly line on a curve to the right having a radius of 2259.01, a distance of 462.77 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRO;IHENTAL ASSESSMENT PART I Project Information NOTICE: This document ~ des~ned to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the envl.c,,-n~nt. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as cart of the a~olication for approval and may be subject to further verification and~ubltc review. Provide any additional info--rich you believe will be needed to comolete PARTS Z and 3. It (s exPectea that ccmoletion of the EAF will be dependent on information cur,early available and will not involve new studies, research or investiqation. If information requiring such additional work is unavai~ble. sO indicate and soecify each instance. NANE OF PROJECT: NAME AND ADD~ESS OF OWNER (If Different) Pecon±c Cx)unty Miniature Rail ~oad Co. ~td. Frs_nit A. F±eld (Name) ADD~ESS AND hAStE OF APPLICANT: (Street) Frank A. Field ~ (State) (ha.m) BUSINCSS PHONE: 38 Middleton Rd. (Street) Greenport, N.Y. 11944 (P.O.) (State) (Zip) 38 Middlet?n Rd. 11944 (Zip) DESCRIPTION OF P~OJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) ~ hu~lcl marl n?~rmt-~ m miniature rail rc~d for public education and ~njoyment by giving t~ain rides. (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not applicable) ..SITE DESCRIPTION '~(Phystca] settin~ of overall project, both develoned and undevelooed areas) . l. Genera) character of the land: Generally uniform slope ¥ Generally uneven and rolling or irreoular Present land use: Uroan , Industrial . , Co,,nercia) ~ , Suburban ., Rural ., Forest , Agriculture x , Other Total acreage of oroject area: 7~?acres- Presently After Comhletion Presently After Completion acres acres acres ___acres 7.2 .acres 6.5 acres Ao~roximate acreage: Meadow or Brushland Forested Aoricultural 'letland (Freshwater or Tidal as net Articles ~4, ~5 nr r.C.L.) acres acres '~rat )s "redomimant soil type(S) on nroiect site? t/ater Surface Area Unvegetated (rock, eartm or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate tyne) __._To_~ ._s.Qil_. ~_. ~,at is de,tn to bedrock? ('n feeL) D__acres -,7 acres acres acres 6. Approxinate percentage of proposed oroject site with slooes: O-lO~ 0 C; ln-l~ %; 15: or greater. %. .. 7. IS project contiguous'to, or contain a buildinn or site listed on th~ National Register of Historic Places? Yes X Ho ' 8. What is the depth to the water table? feet g. DO hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes ~ No 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanqered - .Yes X :lo, according to o Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations -_. Yes X No. (Describe 12. Is the project site presently used by the con, unity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes ~ No. 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the coranunity~ Yes X NO · 14. Streams within or contiguous tO project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary [x~c)ne 1S. 16. 8. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name ~one ; b. Size (in acres) What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a l/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-Z) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). B-1 & A PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 7.2 acres. b. Project acreage developed: T.2~ acres initially~T.2 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 3.6 d. Length of project, in miles:o~{if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age ; developed acreage NO f. Humber of off-strut parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 20 g. Maximum vehicu)ar trips generated per hour 20 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial Ultimate i. If: Orientation :~eighborhood-City-Regional Industrial j. Total height of tallest nronosed structure 18 feet. Estimated Emoloyment 3 -2- 2. HOW much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc. ) will be removed fro~ the site - 0 tons 0 cubic yards. 3. How many acres of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed fro~ site - 0 acres. 4. Will any mature forest (over '100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by thls project? Yes X NO 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to reolace that removed during construction? X Yes __rio 6. ~f single ohase pro,eob: Anbicipated period of construction ~ mont~s, (including demolition). 7. ~f mu ti-~hased oroject: a. Total number of phases anticipated - ~o. b. Anticioated date of con~encement phase I -- demolition) c. Approximate comoletion date final phase d. month - year (including - month - year. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent ohases? Yes NO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? __Yes X No g. Number of jobs generated: during construction 4 ; after project is complete3 lO. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 ll. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? __Yes x No. If yes, explain: 16. 17. 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? __ 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes x No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes X No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes X No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes X No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disQosal facility be used? __Yes No c. If yes, give name: ~ location d. Ilill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes X No Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour oer day)? __Yes X No Yes ~ NO 19. Will project resu)t in an increase in energy use? X Yes Gasoline to operate loccmotive 20. If water supoly is from wells indicate oumoing capacity 21. Total anticioated water usage per day qals/day. 22. Zoning: a. Jdhat is dominant zoning classification of site? b. Current specific zoning classification of site c. !s oroDo~ed use CO~S1Stnnt ~vith nresent zoninq? d. No. If yes, indicate type(s) __ no .gals/minute. B-1 &A B-1 &A Yes If no, indicate desired zo~)nQ No 26. Approval s: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes X NO b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? C. Local and Regional approvals: Yes ~ Ho Approval Requi red (Yes, No) (Type) Submittal Approval (Date) (Date) City, Town, ¥illage Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Heal th Department Other local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoidx~em. TITLE: President REPRESENTING: Peconic County Miniature Rail Road Co. L%d. DATE: 3/19/84 -4- HAP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENt - PART Project Impacts and Their Maqnitude General [nf~,-~ation l:ear~ Carefully) - In completing thc form the reviewer should be gulded by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that am effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sionificant. Any lerge effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By identifying an effect in column 2 simply asks that it be )poked at further. - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the chresholc of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each Question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. )NSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Ye~s if there will be any effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact, if impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact ~hen consider the impact as notentially large and . proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates' that such a reduction is not possible. IMPACT ON LAND NO YES Examples that Would A~ply to Column Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of )engt)i}, or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. __ ronstruction of hayed Darkinq area ~r 1,~Qq or more vehicles. -- Censtruction on lan~ where bedrock ~s exnosed or qenerally wi:hin J feet of existing ground surface. Conscrtction rna? wfll continue for more than 1 year or involve Ex[avaiion cdr m~n~ng purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e. rock or soil) per year. ConstrJction of any new sanitary landfil). -5- SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGt 1. ~ILL THERE ~E AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANRE TQ (~)~) PROJECT SITE? ~ILL THERE 8E AN EFFECT TO ANY UNZQUE OR UNUSUAL LAND F~P~S FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e.. cltff~, dunes, oeological forma- tters, otc,) Specific lan6 forms: ~ :ALL T~) P(1TE~TIAL CAN itlPACT · qgERATJ LRRGE REDUCED BY IMPACT [HPACT PgOJECT CHANGE ~S ~ $ ) ¥£$ © II,PACT ON WATER 3. gILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY gAT£R DOD¥ DESIGNATED AS .... PROTECTEO? {Under Art c es IS, 24, 25 of t~e Envtr- onmontal Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examoles that ~ould Aoply tO Colt~nn 2 ~ Dredgina more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. ~ Construction in a designated Freshwater or tidal wetland. Other tmoacts: Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ~ Other..imnacts: ~ILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDNATER AIALIT¥~ ~NO YES Examples that Hould Apply to Column 2 ~ ~ ~ Prnject wil) require a discharge pemit. ~ Project requires use of a source of water that does not have apuroval to serve oroposed project. __ PrOject requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pump ng capacity. __ Construction or ooeration causing any contamination of a puD)lc water Supply system. ~ Project will adverse)y affect groundwater. L~qu~d effluent will be conveyed off the site to fac~)ities w~ich presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 2~,OOD gallons per day. ~Project ~)1) likely cause siltation or other discharge Into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. !4ILL PROJECT ALTER DRAINAGE FLf)~r, PATTEP!(S O~ SURFAr. E !lATER ~0 YES Examnle that 'lould Anply to Colum ~ Pro)ecl would imoede flood water flows. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. IlO YES ~'ILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY? ........................... Fxamoles that Hould Apply to Column 2 Project will tnduce 1,f)O0 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Project will result in the inctnermtion of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. PmJect emission rate of all contaminants will exceed lbs. ocr hour or a heat source nroducing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Other tm~acts: I~PACT O~ PLANT~ A~ ANI~AI,~ 8. WILL PROJECI, AFFECI, ANY THREATENEO OR ENOANGERED SPECIES? Examoles that Would Apoly to Colun~q 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any oortion of a critical or sionificant wild- - life habi~C. Ao~licatinn of Pesticide or herbicide over more than YES ©0 ExamPle that Would Apply to Column 2 Pro.iect would substantially interfere with an~, resident or m~gratory fis~ or wildlife species. ~tALL TO PilTE~TIAL CA~I IUPACI' BE ~)DEP. A? E LARGE REDUCED DY MRACT I~'P~CT PROJECT CHAI(GE .I -7- 10. I!ILL THE P~OJECT AFFECT VIE!IS, uISTAS C~ THE v!SUAL NQ CH.aRACT£R OF THE ~IFIGHBqR~nQD OP. CO'~,,!IITY? .............. Examnles that t~ould Apply to Column An incnm~atible visual affect caused by the intro~uctinn of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrast to the surroundino landscaoe. A oroject easily visible, not easily screened, that is obviously different from nthers around it. Project will result in the elimination or major screening of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the area. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTOtIC RESOURCES ll. WILL PROJECT I)TPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, PRE-UI~T~IC AR PALEO~FF0GICAL I)~POPTANCE? Examoles that Would Aooly to Column 2 Project occurino wholly or nartially within or contiguous to any Facility or site listed on the National Re~ister of historic places. Any imoact to an archeological site or fossil bed located witNin the project site. Other impacts: NO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION WILL THE PRnjECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO OR FUTURE 0PE)~ SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU?IITIES? ...... Examoles that DIould Aoply to Column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational oooortunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the comunity, Other imoact$: IMDSCT nN TD~NSPORTATION 13, t'ILL THERE BE A~I EFFECT TO EXISTINC TRANSPORTATIAN SYSTEUS? ............................................... Exam,les that Would Annl¥ to Column 2 -- Alteration of present patterns of movement of neople aha/or goo~s. -- Proiect will result in severe traffic ~rob)ems. NO ~MALL TA OOTEI(TIAL CA~i Il!PACT BE ~ODEFUqTE LARGE REDUCED BY YES YES YES 14. IWPACT ON ED{ERGY '~JILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL DR NO ENERGY SUPPLY? .......................................... ©0 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Project causing greater than 5% increase in any fonn of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than BO sinqle or two family residences. Other impacts: iMPACT ON NOISE I5. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GI~ARE, VIBRATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? .... Examoles that I~ould ADoly to Colulm 2 O0 __ Blasting within 1.SOO feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. -- Odors will occur routinely (note than one hour per day). Project will nroduce ooerating noise exceedinn the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. 16. Other impacts: IMPACT OM HEALTH & HA~ARD~ NO YFS HILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? ............. Examples that ~ould Apply to Column 2 QO Project will cause a risk of exolosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or uoset conditions, or there will he a chronic low level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., inclu~inQ wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storaoe facilities for one million or more gallnns of liouified natural gas or other liquids. Other lmoacts: rS~ALL TO POTENTIAL CA;¢ IMPACT CE MODER~TI LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT I~PACT PROJECT CHANGE ) -?- ! UALL TA POTEiITIAL CAN IMPACT 8E ~ODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY I)1PACT IIIPRCT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT Oil G~OWTM AND CHAPJICTER OF COMt~N)TY OR tI~W~ORUO~ WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTER nF THE EXISTING NO YES CO,HUNITY? ................................................ QO Example that Would Apoly to Column 2 The OOpUlation of the City, Town or Village in which the project is located is likely to prow by more than 5~ of resident human ~opulation. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- - ting services wit) increase by more than 5~ per year as a result of this project. __ Will involve any oermanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove nrime agricultural lands from cultivation. The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the c~mmunity. __ Development will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. __ Project will set an important precedent for future projects. __ Project will relocate 15 or mmre emnloyees in one or more businesses. Other impacts: NO YCS 1S THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? Examnles that Would Apply to Column 2 Either government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. -- Objections to the nroject from within the community. POTENTIAL LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE m THE M,~GNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. ~ PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETEPMINATION PART I __ PART II PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF {Parts l, 2 and 3) and considerinq both the maRnitude and imnortance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: A. The ~roject will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment. B. Althoudh the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant eCfect in this case because t~e mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been inc)ude~ as p&rt of the oroposed project. C. The project will result in one or more major adverse imbacts that Cannot be reduced and may cause significant damage to the envlronment. ~e - Signature of Prenarer (if different from resnonsiole officer) PREPARE A NEnATIVE DECLARATION PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATIOE PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH Signature of Rosponslble Official ~n Lead Agency ~nt or type nape of responsible official in Lead Agency EAF ENVIRONMENTAL A$SESS)(ENT - PART III EVALUATIO~I OF THE IMPQRTANCE AF IMPACTS I~IFOR~ATION Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially laroe. - The amount of writino necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient infoFmation to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? I~STRUCTIO~S Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than laroe impact by a pro- Ject change. . 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is importan~ to the minicipality (city, town or village) in ~vhich the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The duration of the impact or effect - Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources or values ~hether the impact or effect can be controlled The regional consequence of the impact or effect Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project apqly to this impact or effect. DETErmINATION OF SIGD)IFICADiCE An action is considered to be significant if: Ane {or more) impact is determined to both lame and its (their) conseouence, based on the review above, is important. PART III STATEMENTS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) 6. IO'.q$'.fO"E. - 4NO. 'q3 6. bi~' 3.~',,t,O"W. - 301.71 6¢0j¢ : 20~': lox Parcel: LASER FICHE FORM SUBDIVISIONS Project Type: Zone Chan,qe Status: Withdrawn SCTM #: 1000 - 55.-2-24.2 Project Name: Peconic Cty. Miniature Railroad Location: n/s/o CR 48, opposite Boisseau Avenue, Hamlet: Southold Applicant Name: Peconic County Miniature Owner Name: Zone 1: Approval Date: //~,//~ PLAT Si,qned Date: Southold Railroad Co., Ltd. OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related infi3rmation Zone 2: C and R's · Homeowners Association · R and M A,qreement: Address: County Filin,q Date: Zone 3: SCAN Date: I SCANNED OCT 2 0 2009 Records Management .\ VAN