Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-109.-2-17.1
Northeast LI C 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 /'THE PI?ESBYTEI?IAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUEJ 2724 MAIN I?D.. CUTCHOGUE. NY I I Wa[er¥ille Point PAUL LaPASOTA MARIANA NEITO NORTH DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 BLOCK: 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE: N 41' 00' 31" ZONING; R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSI~') LONGITUDE: W 72' 29' 13" NAD: 83 AMSL: 20' LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAW[AND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 165 SO.FT.± EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S18020 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINEt'S-, (1) BA~FERY CABINET, (1) UMTS CABINET AND (1) PPC CABINET (8) ANDREW: TMBXX-6516-R2M & (1) GPS UNIT PROPERTY CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: TOM WICKHAM (631) 765-5454 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 (631) 548-7042 LIPA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC T~MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: 3500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, N.Y. I 1739 PAUL LAPASOTA (631) 224-6651 MARIANA NEITO (631) 224-6600 TITLE SHEET 10/13/08 06/08/10 VICINITY PLAN 10/13/08 06/08/10 SITE PLAN AND PLANTING DETAILS 10/13/08 06/08/10 EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATTERY AND EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS 10/13/08 06/08/10 NORTHWEST ANB SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONS 10/13/08 06/08/10 NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 10/13/o8 06/08/10 DETAILS 06/07/10 06/08/10 NORTH WAYNE SMITH WAYNE SMITH OF S 30AKD WILLIAM E COLLINS, AIA AR C H I T E C T $, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE ~iAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com EtA.TE REVISION 01/06/10 FILING 02/12/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/19/10 REVIEW 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR FILING OE/07/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 06/08/10 ISSUED FOR FILING DA"t~ ~ 'TO DAI'B TO FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FILING 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/18/09 REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING FOR FILING FOR FILING FOR REVIEW · T...Mobile- Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE RWY. SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD ,, I, ~ T CtJTCHOGLIE, NY 11935 ~-',?Li ~-~,,~ , ,L1-13-807-C JUN 1 1 2010 ]TITLE SHEET 10/08/08 DIe'WING ~0.: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: 07-7199 VICINITY PLAN SCALE: 1"=70'-0" 2-STORY RESIDENCE -STORY RESIDENCE / / RESIDENC/C/~ / / / 2-STORY RESIDENCE 1 -STORY RESIDENCE 1-STORY RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE \ \ EXISTING WOODLAN[: / \ RESIDENCE 1-STORY RESIDENC / ~ESIDENCE \ \ / ~ 2-STORY RESIDENCE ~ % 1-STORY ~' -STORY / / / ~ ~ ~ ~ x~O~o ~ORY ~0~ ~ CUTCHOGUE ~ X / ~ ~ ~ / R~IDENCE / [ -~ORY 2-~0~ :Y ~0~ ~ / / / \ RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE J \ 2-STORY \ \ RESIDENCE 1 -STORY \ 1 -STORY .~ RESIDENCE 1 -STORY .~ RESIDENCE \ 1-STORY \ ~ / / RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE NOTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARRETF, BONACCr AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 PHONE: (631) 455 1111 JOB NO. A070628 DATED AUGUST ,30, 2007 INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A TAX MAP PREPARED BY COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, REAL PROPERLY' TAX SERVICE AGENCY, COUNTY CENTER, RIVERHEAD, NY 11901. DATED dUNE 5TH, 2007 0 55' 70' 140' 1 "=70' NORTH WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12=1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY li733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-~-8459 htt l~://~w~v.w f eaia.eom CONS~ULTANT: REV-~/Olq 8SUED FOR FILING SSUED FOR REVIEW 8SUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS SSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR REVIEW 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING FOR FILING ISSUED FOR FILING ]8~UBD TO ]SSUUi~ TO FOR FILING FOR REVIEW 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW KEY · T...Mobile. Northeast LLC 5500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN I~:DAD _CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ? }~! : 'LH3-807-C :'~n ,VICINITY PLAN ~ bio.= 10/08/08 07-7199 ~ DRA!t~lO NO.-' AS NOTED DRAWN B~ CT SP-1 SHIeMI' blO.: 2 GE PROPERLY LINE RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS MAY EXCEED FCC UMITS FOR UNCONTROLLED OR GENERAL POPULATION EXPOSURE IN PROXIMI3Y TO ANTENNA FACE. SITE NO. U-13807C PROVIDE ONE SIGN ON THE DOORWAY TO THE STEEPLE LOCATED AT BALCONY LEVEL OF CHURCH 8.5" X 11" EQUIPMENT ID SIGN T-MOBILE LIMITED ACCESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY, WHICH PRODUCES RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION, IS PRESENT WITHIN STEEPLE RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION RANGE IS 1900-2000 MHz IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL T-MOBILE OPERATIONS CENTER AT 1-888-218-6664 24- HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK T-MOBILE SITE ID ~ U-13807C PROVIDE ONE SIGN ON THE DOORWAY TO THE STEEPLE LOCATED AT BALCONY LEVEL OF CHURCH SIGNAGE REOUIREMENT NOTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARRE%r, BONACCl AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS ,175A COMMERCE BRIVE HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 PHONE: (6,31) ,4,35-1111 JOB NO. A070628 BATED AUGUST BO, 2007 '0 \ % % SECTOR 'D'~ 27O' % / / \ k R~2 ,00' / × ISECTOR90' 'B'> LEGEND CONCRETE CURB DROP CURB WALL EDGE OF PAVEMENT o WIRE FENCE STOCKADE FENCE [] PICKET FENCE [] CONCRETE TREE LINE 'Cc HEDGE TREE 55.45 MONUMENT DRAINAGE INLET / STRUCTURE DRAINAGE INLET / STRUCTURE SIGN LIGHT POLE STRUCTURE - BRAINAGE ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT TOP / BO]q'OM OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION FACILITY NOTES A) PROPOSED FEATURES LABELED AS SUCH; ALL ELSE EXISTING OR FUTURE BY OTHERS. B) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILI~' WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND WILL BE VISITED APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO GENERATE ADDITIONAL NOISE, FUMES, VIBRATIONS, DUST, ODORS OR TRAFFIC. C) NO ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. D) NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE. F) THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR RE%AIL SIGNS, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE PROPOSED SITE. G) FIRE PROTECTION AND SECURITY PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORING OF THE SUBJECT SITE. H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE AND NFPA 70, FOR ELECTRICAL WORK AND GROUNDING, t) THE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA MOUNT STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE CONSIDERATION OF ICING. FURTHER, THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18, CHAPTER 17, CHAPTER 18, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION ,3108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. 0 1 O' 20' SlTE PLAN ~ i~O" 1"=2o' NORTH EXISTING WOOD FENCE -- PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT AREA, SEE 1/SP-3 FOR MORE INFORMATION -- PROPOSED CABLE TRAY TO ROUTE ANTENNAS UP INTO EXISTING ATtiC AND TO PROPOSED ANTENNAS EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING -- REMOVE AREAS OF EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE FOR ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. SEE ELEVATIONS SP-4 z, SP-5 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. (B) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETNL 2/SP-3. APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE NOTE: BARE ROOT PLANTS WILL NOT BE PERMI]~'ED. ALL PLANTING TO BE PRUNED JN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST ACCEPTED NURSERYMAN'S PRACTICE -- NEW 6' TALL (MINIMUM) AMERICAN ARBORVITAE EVERGREEN TREES PLANTED © 5'-0" O.C. TO BE PLUMB AS SHOWN ON 1/A-B. (GUARANTEE TREES FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR) 1/2"~ RUBBER HOSE AND 12 GA. GALV. WIRE PROVlBE TURN BUCKLES (3) OR TWIST ABJUSTMENT. BARK CHIPS (V.I.F.) OR EQUIVALENT BACKFILL WITH TOPSOIL MIXED WITH 0/20/0 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF (5) POUNDS PER YARD. WATER THOROUGHLY AND FILL TO EXISTING EARTH LINE ON TREE TRUNK. (B} CEDAR STAKES DRIVEN AND DRAWN STRAIGHT. STAKES SET AT 120' INTERVALS AND EQUAL-DISTANT FROM TREE SUBSOIL TYP. PLANTING DETAIL WILLIAM E COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP ]2-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE ~TA~, NY 11738 VOICE : 6~-689-8450 FAX: 631'-68~-84~9 http://www.wfcaia.com 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 02/12/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/19/10 iSSUED FOR REVIEW 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR FLUNG 06/07/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 06/08/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/18/09 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING 04/29/05 FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW FOR FLUNG FOR REVIEW AREA OF WORK · T-..Mobile. Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOC-;UE 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 " LH3-807-C SITE PLAN DATE: PR©]~CT NO.: 10/08/08 ~ DRAWING NO.: AS NOTED DI~kWN BY: CT NM 30F7 07 7199 SP-2 ~'~. %~ ~ PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO ~ 1'-O" ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ (20) PROPOSED ARBORVffAE ~ACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ~ ~ ~.~ '~ ~ ~ AR~. SEE D~L 2/SP-2 ANTENNA L~ ~) ~ ~ "~ / / ~ EXISTING WOOD PICK~ FENCE ~ANDREW - ~ECIBEL - A.T .o.: f~ .FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH ANDREW TEL~ILT~ ~ . PROPER~ LINE~ L~ ~ ~ REMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA -- (1) PROPOSED UM~ ~BINB WITHIN PROPOSED ACOU~IC~ ~EM( . ~ f '~ %%_ / SEE D~AIL 4/SP-3( ~" ~ -MAX. WIND AR~: 2.9 SQ.~. ~ . o PROPOSED E~IC~ ~~~ ~/M~ER / DISCONNECT SWITCH ~ ~ -MAX. WIND LOAD (¢~OOMPH): 164 LBF (2) PROPOSED BOOER C~IN~S WITHIN PROPOSED ACOU~I~L -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED (1) PROPOSED T-MO~~ / ~/¢0~/ ~M -CONNECTOR ~PE; 7-16 DIN, FEMALE (4) -- ON PROPOSED CONCR~E P~ ~ ~' (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT ~IN~ WITHIN PROPOSED ACOU~ -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TMGOO899A-2 PROPOSED 6'-0" HIOH WHEE VINYL ~NOE TO %~~~ / / ~~~ ~ ~ VERIZON T~SE~OR ~INB ,ui,i~i:,,[ TOP VIEW SIDE ViEW REAR VIEW FRONT VIEW PROPOSED BOARDS -~~' ~/ { ~ ~'''% /X- ~ BY CARRIER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. , , ' . ~ 4'-3 ~/2" EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN ~ [ ~ i PLAN · BAKERY PLINTH F NORTHSTAR NSB170~ BAKERY SPECIFICATION MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS ELECTRICAL ALL NORTHSTA¢ CHARACTERISTICS DRY CELL HIGH PURI~ LEAD 99.99% SI UNITS ENGLISH UNITS 8 HOUR CAPACI~ TO 1.75 VPC 168.1 AU,-.OU~S ~70.~ PLAN · EQUIPMENT ~AB. ,OT~: DISCHARGE AND RECHARGE, EXTREME TEMPERATURE ADDITIONAL CURRENT, CAPACg~ AMP-HOURS (2) BAKERY PLINTHS TO BE NORTEL S18000BP MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. RANGE, DEEP OR SHALLOW AND POWER INFORMATION. FLOAT VOLTAGE 2.29 +/¢ .02 VOLTS PER CELL 2.27 +/- SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE AND INSTALLED BY CYCLIC APPLICATIONS. HEIGHT 320.0 MM 12.60 INCHES ,02 VOLTS PER CELL CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S1802~; HIGH CYCLIC LIFE CAPABILi~ +500 C/3 ~ 80% DOD. WIDTH 125.0 MM 4.92 INCHES CYCLIC RECHARGE 2.45 VPC -- NO CURRENT LIMLT SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE 59-3/64" TALL x 55-1/64" WIDE x 28-15/16" DEEP 10 YEAR FLOAT LIFE AT 25'C (77'F) -- 15 YEAR LENGTH 560.0 MM 22.05 INCHES SHELF LIFE 2 Y~RS INFORMATION. CELL CAPAC)~: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT FLOAT LIFE AT 20'C (68"0. WEIGHT 59.1 KILOG~MS 131.2 SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT 5,000 AMPS WEIGHT: 1114.28 LBS 5 STEP TERMINAL S~L DESIGN TO ENSURE L~K FREE NE~ON-M~ERS 71 NORTHSTAR BAKERY BAKERY CAPACI~: ~70 Ah TO 3~0 Ah OPERATION. FEMALE M8 BRASS INCH-POUNDS COMPANY IS PROUD HVAC CAPACI~: 190 WA~S-COOLING A 250 W TERMINALS PROVIDE MAXrMUM HIGH RATE PERFORMANCE TO BE REGISTERED TO H~TING ~ NEW GPS UNIT BY NAIS AND NO ANNUAL RETIGHTENING. IS0-9001:2000 AND WEIGHT: 1~22 LBS (273 LBS WITHOUT BAKERIES) MODEL VIC-~O0 INTEGRAL HANDLES ENSURE ~SE OF HANDLING. IS0-14001 STANDARDS. ~A~ACHED TO BTS APPROVED AS NON-HAZARDOUS CARGO FOR GROUND, FORM: SES-542-06 ~SSUED: 05/05/04 ECO: 345-S0~ ~ ~, ~ ~ CABIN~. COORDINATE S~ AND AIR TRANSPORTATION. . ~% ' % EXACT LOCATION WITH T-MOBILE RF ENGINEER / % / % GPS L ADAPTER 5'-6" 5'-6" ¢ 7" 2'-6" ¢ / ~ %. ' m m m m m m m / x-. COAXIAL GPS ,. / '. ANTENNA CABLE k / INSTALL MOUNTING ~ k / ANCHORS PROVIDED BY k, / INSTALLER INTO (4) / MOUNTING HOLES ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DRILLED, ~ ~~ ~ ~ AS A TEMP~TE 3 I ~ ~ ~ ~ CABLE COVER II / ~ ',I I I I I ' -' PLAN · EQUIPMENT ~AB. ' ;N% .... -. . NE REINFORCED POURED CONCR~E S~B / / REINFORCED POURED CONCR~E S~B ~ ~ ON GRADE. SEE POURED CONCR~E / ~ / % v ON GRADE. SEE POURED CONCR~E / / PLANNING BOARD SECURE NEW T-MOBiLE BAKERY CABIN~ TO / SECURE NEW T-MOBILE S18000BP BAKERY PLINTH TO / TOWN OF SOU s~ IN HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS. / (~P') BAKERY CABINET DETAILS PICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS SCALE: 5/4"=1 '-0" SCALE: 3/4"= 1 '-0" WILLIAM E COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP ,4'-3 1/2" 12-1 ~OI.OOY DRIVE iS~TAUKET, NY' 11733 VOICI~ : 631-68~-84.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.(0 FA : 631-68g-~459 http://www.wfcaia.com T LOCATION WITH ' }BILE RF ENGINEER L ADAPTER 3KET AND GASKET. iIAL GPS NNA CABLE kLL MOUNTING {ORS PROVIDED BY ~LLER INTO (4) ~TING HOLES .ED, USING BASE , TEMPLATE E COVER CONffULTANT: RE~'ISION ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING FOR REVIEW FOR FILING FOR REVIEW REVIEW FOR FILING FOR REVIEW FOR FILING FOR FILING FOR REVIEW SP 3 · T.. -Mobile- Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE , , ,~,,~ ,,~,, ~,~,,. !1, ',,I MAIN ROAD '"' CUTCHOGUE, NY 11~35 ~ j~ 3 ~ ?OlO "/ L1-13-807-C EQUIPMENT PL'A~i","ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATTERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET DETALS AND PLANT~ DETAL (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN W ~I~ING CHURCH ~EPLE. (~P. 2 PER SECTOR)SEE A ~ C ~ [ T E ~ ~ S, ~ ~ P D~AIL 2/SP-3. ~TCHED ~ INDICA~S POTION OF VOI~ : ~EEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ~65'-0 AGL ACCOMMODA~ PROPOSED ~TEN~ ~ MATERIA~ TO BE REP~CED WI~ j [ T.O. PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE J/- [X~ST~ CHURCH ST~P~[ CONC~E~ TO ~ATC~ ~m~N~ ~ / ~EPLE IN ~L R~PEC~. (8) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ AN:N~ MOUSED WImlN ~ # ~ y-- PROPOSED ~ OF WORK ~~,:'~ ~z'--'~ ~TCHED AR~ INDI~TE$ PO~ON OF ~EEPLE TO BE ~ ~1~I ~ / ~N~ MODIREB TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED AN~NNA IN~TION ~lii~i~ / ~ REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATER~ TO BE REP~CED WI~ ~ ~ / ~51'-10" AGL~ ~51'-10' AGL~ PROPOSED RF COMPATIB~ CONC~ENT TO ~TCH EXI~ING ~ ~ ~', ~: t ~ / ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ~EN~ ~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~ENN~ 5~EEPLE IN ALL RESPE~, ~ ~ PROPOSED ~ OF WORK PROPOSED AN~N~ ~LES ROU~O UP ~ROU~H ~ ~ ~ ~0. - ' 12 01/05/10 ISSUED FOR RUNG ,ssu, I I [ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANT/N~ FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION ~ ~ · OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE AN~N~S ~ 15 ]2/22/10 ISSUED FOE FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS 15 35/05/10 ISSUED FOR ~EVIEW EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE ~ 17 ~5/05/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 1~ 06/07/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW - ~ 1~ 05/08/~0 ISSUED FOR FILING P"OPOSED T-MOBI~ ~B~ T~Y MOUN~D TO ~ =~Fm ~ SIDE OF CHURCH BUI~ING, PROPOSmn ~ ~ ~' =~ ~ 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FOR FILING CARRIER ANTENNAS ~ ~1 ~ ~P~CE OF EXI~NG ~ERIOR BUI~ING ~ ~ :~ ( OF FUTURE . ~55'-10" AGL ~ 11/10/08 FO~ REVIEW 11/18/09 FOR REVEW ,~ ¢~ 11/10/08 FOR FILING ~ LOCATION ~ ~ L~J ~..~ ~ I ~ ',--'~ . ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ FOR RUNG -- EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ~ ~ t~ ~: . %~. ~ :~. .~ 12/16/08 10/15/09 PROPOSED E~VIPMENT ~, SEE ~ ~ ~ / =ROPOSED VERIZON / / i r~NSECTOR BOX / / 'ROPOSED UNI~ / / _ ~ , . :==- : ~ '~~ ~ T.O. PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ T.O. Northeast L~C -- 0'-0" 5500 SUNRISE HWY, ,~l q , ~ ~PROPOSED 6,_0. HiGH WH.E.NYL FENOETO- ~ : __:__ / ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ' I I ' % SCREEN PROPOSED ~ / DlSCONNE~ ~ : ...... / CRUDE ~PROPOSED BOLEROS. SEE D~AIL 2/SP 6 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE : -CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ," :,T~(:,j ~":~,', ' LH3-807-C ~ PROPOSED T-~OBI~ CAB~ T~Y MOUN~D TO ~ SID~ OF CNURCH ~T~ST ELEVA~ONS ~ BUILDINg. PROPOSED ~B~ T~Y TO BE P~N~D TO ~TCH APP~NCE OF [XI~ING E~RIOR BUILDING W~ APPROVED BY ~o/o~/~ o~-~ PROPOSED ANTEN~ ~S ROUTED UP 4ROUGH ~I~ING.- CHURCH BUILDING A~IC I~O ~EP~ PLANNIN~ ~OARD TOWN OF souTHOLD D~ NORTHWEST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION ~ SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" SCALE:5/16"~1' 0" , 50F7 ~' T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE PROPOSED AREAS '51'-10' AGL OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS I Z~.~_42'-9"AGL ~'~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILEANTENNAS EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED Wfl~IIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETNL 2/SP-3. HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATtiC INTO STEEPLE PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATrERY CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM. SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (1) PROPOSED GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET, SEE DETAIL 4/SP-5 (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-3 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM FINISHES TO MATCH EXISTING CHURCH PROPOSED T-MOBILEANTENNACABLESTO BE ROUTED IN PROPOSED TRENCH TO PROPOSED CABLE TRAY AT EXISTING CHURCH, THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH ATtiC TO PROPOSED ANTENNAS Ii II II [J U PROPOSED ELECTRIC METER / DISCONNECT SWITCH PANEL MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT RACK PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UN~UTRACK · 10'-0" AGd~ T.O. PROPOSED ACOUSTICN-H~ SYSTEM T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT o'-o" ~1~ GRADE -r -- (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETNL 2/SP-2 (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE PPC CABINET MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE +65'-0 AGL T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLEq~ -- (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. OYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETAIL 2/SP-3. EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM, SEE DETAIL 4/SP-3 PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM WITH FINISHES TO MATCH EXISTING CHURCH (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (BEYOND) (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (BEYOND). SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 (1) PROPOSED PPG CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM PROPOSED ELECTRIC METER / DISCONNECT SWITCH PANEL MOUNTED TO PROPOSEO UNISTRUT PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT RACK -- (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETAIL 2/SP-2 PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE TO SCREEN PROPOSED MM~R / DISCONNECT & VERIZON TRANSECTOR CABINET Iwl LJ lul Iwl Iwl IL[ SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/1 6"=1'-0" PROPOSED BOLLARDS. SEE DETAIL 2/SP-6 PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNA CABLES TO BE ROUTED IN PROPOSED TRENCH TO PROPOSED CABLE TRAY AT EXISTING CHURCH, THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH An'lc TO PROPOSED ANTENNAS PROPOSED AREAS OF WORK FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION · 51'-10" AGLi~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILEANTENNAS · 42'-9" AGLi~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILEANTENNAS · 33'-10" AGL ¢~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATtiC INTO STEEPLE · 10'-0" AG T.O. PROPOSED ACOU~CAL~ · 6'-10" AGL T.O. PROPOSED I~ T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT ADDD('~/I:I"t ny o'-o" GRADE PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF $OUTHOLD WILLIAM E COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP 12'=1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE ~AUKET, NY 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631'=689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.c0m CONSULTAN ~. RE%~ION ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ISSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING SSUED FOR REVIEW 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING ~TO ~TO 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW FOR REVIEW · -..Mobile. Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-20S GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 '/,' ',U-13-807-C, ~u rHWE:J/ELEVATIONS 10/08/08 07-7199 DRAWING NO.: SP-5 6 OF 7 AS NOTED DRA'WN By1 IM 12 HEADER HINGED BARN O00R FOR EQUIPMENT INTERIOR DOOR CLADDING (TYPE TO BE SELECTED AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN SOUND ORDINANCE) GRADE 4 44 4~ SECTION AT ACOUSTIC SYSTEM SCALE: 3/4" =1 '-0" COMPACTED SAND AND GRAVEL BASE. COMPACTED SUB-BASE 8 X 8 WOOD POST SET IN CONCRETE AT 4-'-0' O.C. 'WOOD B1,O L L./ARD DETAIL SIMULATED CEDAR SHINGLES PLYWOOD SHEATHING RAFTERS 0 1¢ O.C. -- CONTINUOUSLY VENTED VINYL SOFFIT PANEL TOP PLATE -- tIBER CEMENT CLAPBOARD SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING CHURCH WALL CLADDING (TYPE TO BE SELECTED AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN SOUND ORDINANCE) 4 X 4 WOOD POSTS SPACED AS SHOWN ON PLAN WITH 2 X 4 STUDS AT 1¢ 0.6. BETWEEN BEAM ASSEMBLY CONSISTING OF (2) 2 X 12 WITH Y~' PLYWOOD SHIM, SPANNING BETWEEN VERtiCAL POSTS TO SUPPORT WALL FRAMING 8" THICK, 4000 PSI 0 28 DAYS AIR-ENTRAINED POURED CONCRETE PAD WITH HAUNCH AT PERIMETER. 16' ¢ POURED CONCRETE SONOTUBE PIERS 4000 PSI AT POST LOCATIONS NOTE: ALL LUMBER TO ACQ TREATED 3 X 12 CARRIAGE BOLTED TO POST W/ (2) S.S, CARRIAGE BOLTS CUT EDGES TO BE PRESERVED WEATHERPROOF TREATMENT -- ESTORE PAVEMENT TO MATCH EXISTING IN ALL RESPECTS. APPROVED BY PLANNING BOAR,D TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE : 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 htt l~://www.w f tala.eom CON~SULTAi~. REVISION 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR FILING REVIEW ISSUED FOR FLING PER TOWN COMMENTS ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING FOR FILING REVIEW · T.- -Mobile. Northeast LLC 5500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGIJE, NY 11935 U-13-807-C DETAILS 2010 PROJF. CT NO.: 10/0S/U8 07-7/99 AS NOTED NO.: 7 OF 7 SP-6 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L EDWARIX~ DONALD $. !glLCENSKI JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, lqY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June 15, 2010 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. c/o Amato & Associates 666 Old Country Rd., Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Approval: Site Plan for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church Located at 27245 Main Road, on the n/e corner of Main Road and Highland Road, in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Zoning District: R-40 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, June 14, 2010: WHEREAS, the request is for interior mounted antennae within an existing church steeple, including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on August 21, 2009, including a site plan prepared by Nell Alexander MacDonald, dated October 8, 2008; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent technical consultant retained by the Town to assist in the review process; and T-Mobile at Cutcho.que Presbyterian Pa.qe Two June 15, 2010 WHEREAS, on October 7, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board distributed the application to agencies having jurisdiction for their comments, and the following agencies responded: Town Engineer, Architectural Review Committee, NYS Department of Transportation, & the Cutchogue Fire Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies referenced above and by the independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on October 7, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to the Suffolk County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on November 23, 2009, comments were received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the site plan was determined to be a matter of local determination; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2010, a public hearing was held and closed; and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and, as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2010, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and had recommended the proposed project to be consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and certified that the proposed action is a permitted use in this Residential 40 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the action is consistent under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program as outlined in the memo prepared by the LWRP Coordinator; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the site plan entitled "T-Mobile Northeast, LLC", prepared by Neil Alexander MacDonald, R.A., dated October 8, 2008, and last revised June 9, 2010, and including the following eight plans: T-Mobile at CutchoRue Presbyterian PaRe Three June 15,2010 1. T-1 Title Sheet 2. SP-01 Vicinity Plan 3. SP-02 Site Plan 4. SP-03 Equipment Plan 5. SP-04 NW & SE Elevations 6. SP-05 NE & SW Elevations 7. SP-06 Site Details 8. SP-07 Acoustic System Plan Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative, must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. A copy of the approved site plan is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encl. CC: Town Engineer w/map Building Dept. w/map PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H, SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JAMES H. RICH III DONALD J. WILCENSKI January 10, 2012 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Site Plan for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC @ Cutchogue Presbyterian Church Located at 27245 NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109.-2-17.1 Zoning District: R-40 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Planning Board, at their January 9, 2012 Work Session, determined the above- referenced site to be in conformance with the approved site plan, dated June 9, 2010, based on the observations made via site inspection conducted December 1,2011. This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies; Planning Board approval is required prior to any significant changes to the site. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman CC: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, January 9, 2012 2:30 p.m. Executive Board Room, Town Hall Annex 2:30 p.m. Applications i_~tioni ¥~'~'~:~t~'~;~i~ Church or Society of Cutchogue, 27245 Main ~oao Description: The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless communication facility having interior mounted antennas within an existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church bud ng on a 0 91-acre s te ocated n the R-40 Zoning District. statusi ~in~i Pendin'~ m~{i~ ~ A~t ~n R~'~ ~fl Fna nspect on LeBer Attachments: : Draft LeEer Cutchogue 5~c~pti~ Y~' ~ ~i~ i~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ti~g automotive repair shop . and gasoline se~ice station to a 1,206 s.f. convenience store and gasoline se~ice station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business =, .Z0ning_Distri~t: Status Fna Pend ng nspection Act on Rev ew draft Fna nspect on Le~er. AEachments Draft Le~er Patio , Des~ ~t 0~ ~ ~ ~ ~o add a pat o to the Brecknock Hall site. Status: Pre-submission ACtiS~ A iSW F bFbA'Ai ~b ~i~ ~'~ ~ ~'~ ~it~ plan application Attachments: Draft Plan Project name: Currie, Lawrence 19.2 Location: ~ Soundview Avenue, +/- 101.85 feet north east of Kenny's Road, ~n Southold DeSc~ P~ ~ni I_in~ ~difi~i~ SCTM#1000-59-6-19.2 to SCTM#s 1000-59-6-18.1 and 19.1, eliminating 19 2 and ncreas ng the two remaining lots by approx. 0 2 acres. Status Pe.nding Act on Rev ew recent subm ss on by agent. Attachments Staff RePort Plannin~Board Site Inspec~on Record Project Name~l~'7- [~,O/Di[q_ /(,.]0(JT~e(2.<o~ TaxMap# IC)q-~o~,- I7_ I Date [~)t ¢?.1~ ~,( ^tte.ding: ?~/A Purpose of site visit: Notes: MS4 Reporting ~ ~ Illicit discharge on or near site~ Y or N ~ If Yes, briefly describe: (provide copy of this report to Town Stormwater Manager) Milicia Electric Corp. PO Box 6194 North Babylon, NY 11703 631-694-0751 (phone) 631-694-0754 (fax) FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE; 11/18/2011 TO: Brian Cummincds FROM:,, Milicia Electric Corp. FAX: 631-765-3136 FAX: 631-694-0754 TEL: 631-765-1938 TEL: 631-694-0751 CC: PAGES: 3 COMMENTS: Attached is a leR~r reque~tm~ a ~1 ~cdon ~om ~ PI~ Bo~ on ~e T-Mobflc tel~om~c~o~ si~ at 27245 Ma~ Roa~ Cu~ho~, I al~ a~ched a copy of~e 1~ of cool--ion ~ ~e ~. ~ me ~ow if you n~ ~g el~ ~o~ me. ,lc, nathan LaValle Milicia Electric Corp. 631-~94-0751 MILICIA ELECTRIC CORP. PO Box 6194 North Babylon, NY 11703 631-694-0751 (phone) 631 ~694-0754 (fax) November 18ta, 2011 Town of Southold Planning Board 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Request for final Plam~g Board inspection To Whom It May Concern: Milicia Electric Corp. would like to request a final inspection fi, om the Plamatng Board for the T-Mobile telecommunications site at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Lq order to get building permit #35693 closed out and a certificate of occupancy issued from the building department. Attached is a letter of completion fi:om the A/E on tl'fiS sitc. Thank you for your assistance. Should you need any other Jaformafion from our comply or a representative at the final inspection please contact' Jonathan LaValle at 631-694-0751. Frank Milicia President of Milicia Electric Corp. October 20, 2011 Mr. Paul Lapasota 3500 Sunrise Highway' Suite D-203 Great River, NY 11739 T-Mobile Communications Inc. New Equipment Shed and Antenna within Existing Steeple 27245 Main Road, Cutehogue, N.Y, 11935 T-Mobile Site No, LI-13-807-C WFC Project No. 07-7199 WILLIAM F, COLLINS, AIA A R C H I Y E C'F$, L L P Dear Mr. Lapasota, William F. Collins A1A, Architects, LLP (WFC) visited the above referenced site on February 17, 2011 to conduct a final review of the recently completed work relating to the antenna aud equipment installation project drawings prepared by our office, issued on June 29, 2010 for the captioned T-Mobile Cellular Con~nunications Facility_ WFC inspecteat all visually verifiable work for the above referenced project and documentation provided by the contractor for the newly installed footings and fred it to be in accordance with the building plans mad NYS building ende. Regards, ~: P. L~m~g T-Mo(fie kkr,~ /' 5?)/ t0-1 TE(HNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NV 11733 PII;631-689-8450 FAX; 651-689-84~9 405 LEXINGTON AVE CHRYSLER BLDG, 26TH FLR NEW YORK, NY 10174 / IATO & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUN'I RY ROAD 9TH I~ LOOR GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK 11530 TEL: (5161 227-6363 FAX: (5161227~367 June 17, 2010 402 MAIN ST. SUITE 204 METUCHEN. NJ 08840 TEL: (7321317-1511 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning t3oard I(/'% n of Southold 34375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 AIIII.: Kristy Winser Re; T-Mobile Northeast LLC ffk/a Omnipoint Communications, lnc.'s ("T-Mobile") Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17. I (the "Property") T-Mobile Site Ref.: 1,1-13-807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103-400 Dear Krist>: I"ollo~ing tip on ~our correspondeDce dated May 27, 20 t 0, eDclosed is a check lbr $1,250, payrable to the '[OX~D of Southold, representing the required SEQI~,A revie',v fee. If you have any questions, or require anything additional, please let us know. Thank you. Very truly yours, (iregor> I~,. Alvarez Incl. I'im F'incham (via email. Jennifer Donoht~e {xia cmaiL W/ellcl.) PLANNI~ BOAP~D MEMBERS MARTIN H. ~IDOR Chair WILLI&M J. CREMEHS KENNETH L EDWARDS DONALD J. WILCENSKI JOSEPH L. TOWNS~.ND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Houte 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone.' 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June 15, 2010 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. c/o Amato & Associates 666 Old Country Rd., Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Approval: Special Exception for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Chumh Located at 27245 Main Road, on the n/e corner of Main Road and Highland Road, in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Zoning District: R-40 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, June 14, 2010: WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on August 21, 2009, including a site plan prepared by Nell Alexander MacDonald, dated October 8, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the above-referenced request for a Special Exception for interior mounted antennae within an existing church steeple, including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; and T-Mobile at Cutchogue Presbyterian Page Two June 15, 2010 WHEREAS, the submission by the applicant has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town to assist in the review process; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2010, a public hearing was held and closed; and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and, as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2010, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above-referenced project and had recommended the proposed project to be consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and certified that the proposed action is a permitted use in this Residential 40 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the General Requirements in 280-70 were met; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board made a determination that the applicant has satisfied the requirements for a Special Exception pursuant to Town Code Section 280-142 based on the following: That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection. WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the application to determine whether it met the additional standards for a Special Exception Approval for a Wireless Communication Facility pursuant to §280-73B as follow: T-Mobile at Cutcho,que Presb~erian Page Three June 15,2010 1. Construction of the proposed facility or modification of the existing facility is a public necessity, in that it is required to meet current or expected demands of the telecommunications provider and to render adequate service to the public. 2. The applicant has made substantial effort to co-locate with existing wireless facilities, or, failing that, has made substantial effort to locate on municipally- owned land or structures, or within or on existing buildings or structures. 3. There are compelling reasons which make it more feasible to construct the proposed facilities tether than alternatives; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Planning Board hereby finds and determines that the standards for Special Exception Approval have been met; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the action is consistent under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program as outlined in the memo prepared by the LWRP Coordinator; and be it further RESOLVED, that after deliberetion of the application and consideration of the above factors, the Southold Town Planning Board grants the Special Exception for a Wireless Communication Facility with Conditions as shown in the site plan application for "T-Mobile Northeast LLC", prepared by Nell Alexander Mac Donald, R.A., dated October 8, 2008, and last revised June 9, 2010: The conditions of Special Exception Approval are as follows: If the wireless facility is removed or discontinued for a period of 12 months, the applicant/owner is required to re-apply for a Special Exception. The applicant/owner agrees that in the event the wireless facility on the property ceases to operate for a period of 12 months, the wireless facility shall be deemed abandoned and agrees to remove said facility within 90 days of notice. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to Special Exceptions: 1. Any Special Exception Approval granted under this article shall have a term of five yeare, commencing from the grenting of the Special Exception, which may be extended for an additional five-year term upon application to the Planning Board. 2. On a renewal application, the applicant shall demonstrate that the wireless communication facility is in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and with all of the conditions of the Special Exception Approval and site plan, that the facility is necessary to provide adequate service, and that there is no reasonable alternative available to the owner which will provide adequate service without the continuing use of the facility. 3. Subsequent Special Exception renewals shall be subject to review by the Planning Board and subject to such standards that shall be included in the Town Code at that point in time. T-Mobile at Cutcho.que Presbyterian Pa.qe Four June 15, 2010 A copy of the approved site plan is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Encl. cc: Town Engineer w/map Building Dept. w/map 5~375 Mare Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0939 Tclcphonc (631) 763-1802 Fax (631) 7634)302 13[ tiLl)IN(. I)LPAR 1 MLN l TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chairman FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: June 8, 2010 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: T-Mobile Northeast Location: Presbyterian Church, 27245 NYS Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000 Section 109-Block2_ Lot 17.1 Date: October 08, 2008 Revised Date: June 08, 2010 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 144 AND 280 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Wireless Communication Facility IS A PERMITTED USE BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN THIS R-40 DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. Chief Building Inspector 405 LEXINGTON AVE CHRYSLER BLDG, 26TH FLR NEW YORK, NY 10174 TEL: (212) 495-~00 FAX: (212) 48~6001 A IATO & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK 11530 TEL: (516) 227-6363 FAX: (516) 227-6367 June 9, 2010 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Kristy Winser Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, lnc.'s ("T-Mobile") Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17.1 (the "Properly") T-Mobile Site Ref.: LI-13-807-C/Presbyterian Church,/ Our File No.: 103-400 Dear Ms. Winser: Following up on the Planning Board work session held on May 17, 2010, and our subsequent communications, enclosed are nine (9) copies of Zoning Drawings, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP, which incorporate in the remaining Town comments, including the proposed bollards on the western side of the proposed acoustical system which will surround the proposed equipment compound. Please note that in connection with the acoustical system, T-Mobile has provided same in order to comport with the comments expressed by the Planning Board, and in order to meet the acoustical standard set tbrth in the Town Code's ordinance for Wireless Communication Facilities at Article XVII, §280-67 et seq. However, T-Mobile wishes to express that it has provided the acoustical system despite its belief that it may be more appropriate to provide a more conventional screening system (i.e., fencing and landscaping). Regarding the Town Code's acoustical standard, T-Mobile believes that it is atypical in that it requires an applicant to meet a sound level at ten (10') from the facility, rather than from neighboring property lines. Notwithstanding tile foregoing, provided everything is in proper order, we look forward to the Planning Board acting on the Application as proposed at its next public hearing on June 14, 2010. If you have any questions, or require anything additional, please let us know. Thank you. Encls. CC: Tim Fincham (via email, w/out encls.) Wayne Smith (via email, w/out encls.) Gina Jacobellis (via email, w/out encls.) Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez dUN 11 D10 : ~WORK SESSION AGENDA SOI. I~'HOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, June 7, 2010 4:00 p.m. Applications Project name: CJCI Corp. I SCTM#: I 45-4-4.1 Location: 74495 NYS Route 25 Description: This site plan is for the proposed construction of one building of 8,960 sq. ft. with the first floor containing, rental space, contractor's business office garage storage and an apartment on the second floor on a 1.036 acre parcel in the B Zone. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review site plan and comments received. Attachments: Staff Report Project name: T-Mobile Northeast I SCTM#: I 1000-109-2-17.1 Location: The Presbyterian Church or Society of Cutchogue, 27245 Main Road Description: The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless communication facility having interior mounted antennas within an i existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review draft resolution. Attachments: Draft Resolution Project name: Shinn Vineyards I SCTM#: ! 1000-100-4-3.1 Location: 2000 Oregon Road, Mattituck Description: Proposed site plan for the as-built construction of four (4) buildings including a 1,646 sq. ft. wine making and wine tasting building with 336.3 sq. ft. of deck, a 2,730 sq. ft. wine storage barn, an 884.1 sq. ft. accessory storage building and a 206.1 sq. ft. frame shed on a 979,664 sq. ft. (22.49 acres) parcel whereas, the development area is 53,078 sq. ft. (1.21 acres) in the Agricultural Conservation District. Status: New Site Plan Action: Review draft resolution. Atta_c_h m~e_n t_s: ...... ~_.D__ra~ff~R_e_~_o I u tigon_ ............... Project name: Location: Description: Valero Service Station I SCTM#: I 1000-102-5-26 on the n/w corner of Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue This site plan is for the conversion of an existing automotive repair shop and gasoline service station to a convenience store and gasoline service station on an 18,473 sq. ft. lot in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. Under Review Status: Action: Review draft resolution. Attachments: Draft Resolution P.O. Box 1179 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 To: Greg Alvarez From: Kdsty Winser Fax: 516 227-6367 P~ges: 3 (including cover) Phone: Date: May 28, 2010 Re: SEQR Fee Request cc: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply As Requested Attached is the letter dated January 27, 2010 requesting $1,250 to the Town of Southold to cover the cost of the technical consultant's review (I understand the letter sent to you was not clear for SERA review). I also am enclosing a letter dated January 5, 2010 with the review cost from NPV. Let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you PLANNING BOARD iVIEblBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND May 27, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southald, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: T-Mobile Northeast at Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Alvarez: Although we have received an invoice from the consultant, we still have not received payment of $1,250 requested in our letter to you of January 27. This fee is for SEQRA review of the above-referenced project, and not application review as initially described. Please forward a check payable to the Town of Southold for the requested amount to my attention as soon as possible. Thank you. Sincerely, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Walter A. Cooper Radio Frequency Planning & Consultation 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 757-220-9442 May 21, 2010 Ms. Heather Lanza Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Billing for T-Mobile at Presbyterian Church (P.O. No. 20997) Dear Ms. Lanza: I recently submitted a final invoice in the amount of $300.00 for the referenced project. The previous invoices (which have been paid) totaled $1,520.00, making the grand total $1,820.00. This exceeded my original estimate of $1.750.00 by $70.00. More time was required to complete my review than was anticipated. This is because the applicant did not submit all of the information required by the Town Code and, on at least two occasions, was not responsive to requests for specific information. Most notable were the applicant's inadequate responses to sound level mitigation requirements and requirements for an RF safety plan. This resulted in multiple requests and re-reviews of the applicant's submittals. For these reasons, I would appreciate it very much if you could approve payment for the full amount of the invoice. Very truly yours, Walter A. Cooper INVOICE wa[te~ A. Cooper wartercoop er~,vedzo n.net (P.O. No. ~. Kdsty Winser Review of T-t~l~l.e Wlrele~ FadUty FRO. JECT PAYM~JT TERMS DUE DATE r-Mobile at Cutdm~ue Ppesl~jterlan Church ~/10 Hat 30 6/17/10 3.0 5/7/2010 Revie~ze~lse~lllatei~fn~n~l~lc~lt~lld.~JIX~ltRe~ml.~l S 100.00 $ Cd~D TOTAL S 300.00 Town of Southold, New York - Pa' Vendor Tax ID Number or Social $~urity Number Vendor Name Walter A. Cooper Vendor Telephone Number 7~7 -2~o- ?¥¢2_ Vendor Contact VendOr No. ~ment Voucher 357 s V~dor Addr~s Invoice Invoice Invoice Number Date Total Discount Consulting work B 8025 4 500 500 150. 007 8020 4 500 500 (def6rred) .,- B2115.30 revenue Payee Certification The undersigned (Claimant) (Acting on b~half of the abov~ nan~xl clain~mt) doe~ hereby cerfi~ that the forego~ag claim is true and com~ct, that no pa~t ha~ been paid, except as themln stated, that the balance thetn:in s~ated is actually due and owing, and that ~ta~fro~ which the Town is exempt ~u~ excluded. Signature /~ Title__ ¢o~.~m~ / D~,,~/~ / Department Cerfificn~on I h~r~by certify that th~ materials above ~pecified have been received by me ia good condition without substitution, the services properly performed and that the quantities ~he~of have been verified with the exceptions or disempanei~ nol~l, and payment is aPlnOV~. 6 Town of Southotd, New York- Pa Veudor No. ?merit Voucher 14161 '~ 2o.~ ~,L~. ? ~oo 250 / ~c* ~ '. ~' , . ,.oo. r, " : ~(1,250.00) ~ .2115.30 ' ' ._L~ ~ ..... .,,,.. ~....., ' i ~ "' ~'~' '~ Department Cerliricalion ~"'"'~,;~.'.-~>--_d~..';LL;L. ' '- PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND May 21, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Gregory R. Alvamz, Esq. Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: T-Mobile Northeast at Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Alvarez: We have received a final invoice in connection with the review of the above application. The invoice totals $70 above the amount originally requested. Therefore, we are requesting an additional payment of $70 to the Town of Southold to cover the cost of the technical consultant's review. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, May 17, 2010 4:00 p.m. Site Plans IProject name: Location: Description: Status: _J_EMCO Winery l SCTM#: [ 1000-35-1-24 825 Route 25, Greenport This site plan is for construction of an 8,419 s.f. building with associated parking for the purposes of a retail winery on 60.33 acres located in the R-80 Zoning District.. ........................................................................ New Site Plan Review Staff Report and site plan materials. Recommend that the Planning Board accepts the application for review and begins the SEQR process. Staff Report Action: Attachments: _LProject name: ~)cation: Status: T-Mobile Northeast i SCTM#: r 1000-109-2-17.1 The Presbyterian Chumh or Society of Cutchogue, 27245 Main Road The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless communication facility having interior mounted antennae within an existing chumh steeple and a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning_ District. Site Plan Review Action: Review new submission. Attachments: Staff Report, Letter from Appli_cant ......................... hProject name: ~-Lo~ation: - I Description: iT-Mobile NE at Orient Fire District~ SCTM#: I 1000-18-5-13.8 ~_a_tu~i ................. i Amended Site Plan & Special Exception LAc~)~ ......... _~ Review draft ZBA comments. s/s/o Main Road at the s/e intersection of Main and Tabor Roads, Orient Wireless Facility. Proposed co-location of internally mounted antenna to an existing 90-foot monopole structure by adding a 1 O-foot extension (total 100 feet) and related equipment area on a 4.4-acre parcel in the R- 80 Zone. Pr_o_Le~ct name: ~_Barb's Vegg_,es i SCTM~:,'~-i000-86-1-15 LD Rt iH escr on: o ouse/Greenhouse Status: .............................. ~ Ope_n L_A_.c. tJ_o..n_: .......................... ~__A__c_~e~_t for review; be in referral p_[ocess ' L ~_a_c..h_ ~.n_[s.; .......... Winser, Krist~ From: Sent: To: Subject: Gregory AIvarez [galvarez@amatofirm.com] Thursday, May 13, 2010 8:53 PM Winser, Kristy T-Mobile Site Ref.: Ll-13-807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103-400 RFSafe~ Plan.d~ Kristy: For overnight delivery, we are sending you a package of materials that we hope will answer the remaining questions and issues for the above matter. As part of this submission, we noted that the RF Safety Plan would be sent under separate cover. Attached for your review is a draft RF Safety Plan. Please review same, along with the other materials, and confirm that this will be sufficient to meet Mr. Cooper's request. In the event it is sufficient, we would be happy to forward to you (or bring with us on Monday) hard copies of same. I am out of the office tomorrow, but will be returning on Monday. If you have any questions that should receive attention tomorrow, you may call me on my cell at 201-638- 7686. Thank you for your continuing assistance. Regards, Gregory R. Alvarez Associate Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Phone: (516) 227-6363 Fax: (516) 227-6367 E-Mail: galvarez@amatofirm.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information from the law firm of Amato & Associates, PC. This e-mail and any files attached may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please forward same to sender and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. ..... Original Message ..... From: Winser, Kristy [mailto:kristy.winser@tow~.southold.ny.us] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 3:50 PM TO: Gregory Alvarez subject: RE: Cutchogue Pres. T-mobile Hi Greg, I got your message and look forward to your submission tomorrow. If it's easier you can forward a copy of the enclosure detail and I will speak to the Building Department on it. I will contact you if I have any questions and as always you can contact me anytime. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning D~rtment P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.winser@town.southold.ny.us ..... Original Message ..... From: Gregory Alvarez [mailto:galvarez@amatofirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:27 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: RE: Cutchogue Pres. T-mobile Thank you. Gregory R. Alvarez Associate Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Phone: (516) 227-6363 Fax: (516) 227-6367 E-Mail: galvarez~amatofirm.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information from the law firm of Amato & Associates, PC. This e-mail and any files attached may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please forward same to sender and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. ..... Original Message ..... From: Winser, Kristy [mailto:kristy.winser@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:27 AM To: Gregory Alvarez Subject: Cutchogue Pres. T-mobile Hi Greg' In connection to the PB work session held Monday 10, 2010, attached is the report from Walter Cooper for your review. As discussed, please provide further detail for the compound area and provide responses to the attached letter to be reviewed during work session May 17, 2010 @ 4pm. Let me know if you have any questions on this. have a good day. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.winser@town.southold.ny.us <<Southold Omnipoint Pres Church 5 7 10 Rpt 4 .pdf>> 405 LEXINGTON AVE CHRYSLER BLDG, 26TH FLR NEW YORK, NY 10174 TEL: FAX: (212) 48~-6~1 vlATO & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 0TH FLOOR GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK 11530 TEL: (516) 2276363 FAX: (516) 22'~-6367 May 13, 2010 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Kristy Winser Re~ T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc.'s ("T-Mobile") Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility (the "Communication Facility") to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: IT1 (the "Property") T-Mobile Site Ref.: LI-13-807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103-400 Dear Ms. Winser: Following up on the Planning Board work session held on May 10, 2010, enclosed are nine (9) copies of the following materials which constitute the remaining requested items: RF Safety Plan, prepared by Scinetics Corporation, to address comment 1 in correspondence from Walter A. Cooper, dated May 7, 2010 ( to be submitted under separate cover). Third Supplemental RF Affidavit, executed by Mariana Nieto, T-Mobile's RF engineer, to address the RF questions in comment 2 from Mr. Cooper's correspondence. Drawings, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP, which depict additional details for the proposed acoustical system to surround the proposed equipment compound. Photo Simulation, prepared by DMS Consulting Services, Inc., to provide a representation of the proposed acoustical system. In response to your email correspondence dated May 11, 2010, please note that in connection with the acoustical system, the design now incorporates roofing. Therefore, we ask that you confirm with the Town Building Department that this new design will meet Town Code requirements. Provided the Building Department interprets that the acoustical system is in compliance, we will provide final full zoning drawings reflecting same. ANLATO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Moreover, we would like to briefly comment on Mr. Cooper's questions in connection with RE need. Despite his well meaning attempts to assist the Planning Board, T-Mobile believes that it has provided sufficient information to meet all RE requirements set forth under the Town Code's ordinance in connection with wireless communication facilities, found at Chapter 280, Article XVII. In an attempt to end the cycle of written communications between Mr. Cooper, the Town's RE consultant, and Ms. Nieto, T-Mobile's RF engineer, we respectfully request a determination from the Planning Board that with Ms. Nieto's Third Supplemental RE Affidavit, enclosed herewith, they are satisfied with the proof provided to establish T-Mobile's need for the Communication Facility. Otherwise, T-Mobile fears that Mr. Cooper's inquiries regarding information already provided to the Planning Board will continue indefinitely. Provided everything is in proper order, we look forward to appearing again before the Planning Board on May 17, 2010, to discuss any remaining issues regarding this matter, and for the Application to be set for decision. If you have any questions, or require anything additional, please let us know. Thank you. Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez Encls. CC: Tim Fincham (via email, w/out encls.) Wayne Smith (via email, w/out encls.) Gina Jacobellis (via email, w/out encls.) PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application of T-Mobile Northeast LLC, f/ka/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc., as Applicant, and the Presbyterian Church or Society of Cutchogue, as Owner for all necessary permits to construct, operateand maintain a public utility wireless communication facility located at: 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York. known and designated as Suffolk County Property Tax Id. No.: District: 1000, Section: 102, Block: 1, Lot: 12 ("Property") THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL RADIO FREQUENCY AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) MARIANA NIETO, being duly swom, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer, employed by T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (hereinafter "T-Mobile"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in wireless telephone network coverage and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna cell sites to remedy service deficiencies in wireless communications coverage. 2. I submit this Third Supplemental RF Affidavit in response to the correspondence from Walter A. Cooper, the Town of Southold's ("Town") radio frequency consultant, dated May 7, 2010 (the "Correspondence"), at paragraph 2. In addition, I submit this affidavit in support of T-Mobile's special exception and site plan application (the "Application") to the Town Planning Board with respect to the construction of a public utility wireless communication facility (the "Communication Facility"), designed to remedy a deficiency in wireless telephone network coverage that exists in the Cutchogue area, at the Property. 3. Mr. Cooper appears to have two sets of questions in paragraph 2 of the Correspondence. As was the case in my review of prior correspondence from Mr. Cooper in my Second Supplemental RF Affidavit, each of the items referenced in paragraph 2 the Correspondence has been addressed during the course of the hearing process before the Planning Board. 4. Regarding Mr. Cooper's first set of questions, which concems the coverage gap, Mr. Cooper sets forth the following assessment: "In the [Second Supplemental RF Affidavit], Ms. Nieto variously states that '... the signal required in and around the site [is] -76 dBm...' that '... T-Mobile's required signal strength is at -76 dBm, which is an in-building coverage level...' that 'the primary objective for T-Mobile within the Cutchogue area is to supply both in-vehicle coverage along Main Road, as well as in-building coverage within the surrounding structures' and that '[the] location [will] provide seamless, ubiquitous . . . coverage...' These statements seem vague, confusing and self-contradictory." 5. On the contrary, all of the above statements are consistent with one another. As Mr. Cooper is no doubt aware, in-building coverage is a stronger signal in order to penetrate the material which comprises a building structure. Therefore, T-Mobile's -76 dBm in-building signal will serve not only the surrounding buildings, but also the in-vehicle needs along the roadways within the vicinity. The in-building signal would be inclusive of both in-building and in-vehicle coverage, because an in-building signal will not only penetrate into buildings, but also less onerous vehicle shells, which will permit signals into passing vehicles. 6. Mr. Cooper next asks "Are only some buildings and some roads in the gap area to be covered?" Although this question does not appear to directly relate to his previous thought, it was addressed previously during the course of the Planning Board process. As is the case with any facility, external factors will dictate the amount of coverage that will be provided to the surrounding area. Such limitations as tree cover and topography will limit the extent of signal coverage provided by a wireless facility. Therefore, as testified at the public hearing on January 11, 2010, the Communication Facility will substantially cover the gap in the area. This will not be 100% coverage, but it will vastly improve the current lack of coverage for T-Mobile within the area. 7. Next, Mr. Cooper asks "If so, which ones and where? Which buildings are the 'surrounding' buildings?" In answer to this, we direct Mr. Cooper to the prior propagation maps previously prepared and submitted as part of the Application to depict the existing and proposed in-building coverage. On these maps are depicted the anticipated coverage of the Communication Facility, shown in green. The buildings located in the green area are anticipated to receive the in-building level signal. Those buildings outside the green area will not. 8. Next, Mr. Cooper asks "How far along Main Road is in-vehicle coverage required?" Generally, in-vehicle coverage is required along the entirety of Main Road. However, in connection with the area around the proposed site, during the January 11, 2010, public hearing, I defined the in-vehicle coverage gap along Main Road as 2.50 miles in length. As can be seen on the previously supplied propagation maps, this length of "white space" extends from approximately Skunk Lane to the east of the site to Road D to the west of the Property. -2- 9. Mr. Cooper continues by asking "Is coverage not required on other roads as well?" Certainly T-Mobile is seeking to provide in-vehicle coverage along other roads. However, because it is by far the busiest roadway near the Property, the primary in-vehicle objective is to have coverage along Main Road. 10. Mr. Cooper next asks, "What is 'seamless, ubiquitous coverage?' How is it provided if only the 'surrounding' buildings and some roads are covered?" To answer the first question, this language is noted in the Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999, under Congress' findings, wherein they note that "the construction and operation of seamless, ubiquitous, and reliable wireless telecommunications systems promote public safety and provide immediate and critical communications links among members of the public; emergency medical service providers and emergency dispatch providers; public safety, fire service and law enforcement officials; transportation officials, and hospital emergency and trauma care facilities." (Emphasis added). It has been defined in various ways by different parties. Nonetheless, as for the second question, it should be noted that the goal of "seamless, ubiquitous coverage" is ongoing, and will be achieved by the proposed Communication Facility in concert with the other existing sites within the area. 11. Mr. Cooper next explores a new subset of questions by writing, "For that matter, the gap that the applicant seeks to remedy has still not been clearly defined. Is it the area depicted on the initial propagation maps as lacking coverage at -76 dBm (in-building) or the area shown as lacking coverage at -84 dBm (in-vehicle) or is it some combination? Are there two gap areas - one for vehicles and one for buildings?" As discussed in paragraph 8, above, at the January 11, 2010, hearing, I provided a comprehensive listing and description of the gaps at the in-building and in-vehicle levels, as well as the on-street level (which is required under the Town Code). They are as follows: In-Building Gap: North-South = 2.14 miles, East-West = - 2.72 miles In-Vehicle Gap: North-South -- 2.12 miles, East-West = 2.63 miles On-Street Gap: North-South = 1.31 miles, East-West = - 2.42 miles. 12. In addition, as noted on various occasions throughout this process, T-Mobile builds its network to the -76 dBm level, but there are gaps also at the other two primary levels of in-vehicle and on-street. Evidence of gaps at all three levels further supports the fact that T- Mobile is experiencing a deficiency in coverage in and around the Property. 13. As for Mr. Cooper's second main set of questions, he asks for further clarification on the type of equipment used in assessing T-Mobile's need in the subject area. Specifically, Mr. Cooper asks: "What computer model was used? How was the model calibrated for local conditions? Were drive tests conducted? What other information was used to confirm the conclusions provide by the model? Did she conduct in-building signal strength measurements? Were customer complaint logs and lost and dropped call statistics from adjacent sites consulted? What did they show?" 14. In answer to the above questions, I used the Aircom International computer model, which is also named Enterprise Network Planning, or ASSET. The model was calibrated by Aircom International based on widely accepted industry standard methods. Drive tests were conducted, and confirmed the gap in coverage within the area. I did not conduct in-building signal strength measurements. However, no measurements were necessary because the drive test results conclusively showed that there was a clear deficiency. Customer complaint logs and dropped call statistics were consulted, and confirmed the gap in coverage. 15. In summary, Mr. Cooper states in the Correspondence that his "goal has been to assist the Town in understanding the applicant's needs and whether or not the proposed facility will meet those needs in the least obtrusive manner in accordance with the Town's zoning regulations." T-Mobile believes the above information, supplementing the prior materials and testimony provided to the Planning Board, is sufficient under the Town Code to demonstrate T- Mobile's need for coverage in the area around the Property, and that it is the least obtrusive alternative to fulfill said need in the area. -4- CONCLUSION 16. Therefore, as stated previously, based on the foregoing data, maps and analysis, it is my professional opinion that: (i) there exists a serious deficiency in T-Mobile's wireless communications coverage within the Cutchogue search area; (ii) the alternative sites, which are located within one-half mile of the Property, are also suitable to remedy T-Mobile's service deficiency within the Cutchogue search area but are unavailable for leasing; and (iii) thus this Communication Facility is the best suited, feasible, available location to provide seamless, ubiquitous, reliable coverage within thc Cutchogue search area. 17. Based on the foregoing, we believe all of Mr. Cooper's questions have been answered, and that the Communication Facility should be favorably considered by the Planning Board and T-Mobile's requested Application should be granted. T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC By: Name: o Title: Radio Frequency Engineer Sworn to before me this ~ ~tP'day of May, 2010 r ~ ~Nlob~le~ Site Number 1.1-13~807 b'iew 3. Existing view of the equipment compound fi-om the rear parking lot. looking E~tst. I I Prqjecl ,,lddress- z ,- 27245 Main Road ~s CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. Cutchogue, NY 11935 ~a~,,~, l/ie~4, 3a. Proposed view ~?f the equil;men! compound fi'om /he rear parking lot. looking EasL Site ?/'umber Prqje~t ~tddres,~: 1.1-13-80 7 27245 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 )7-7199 ·Mobile -~ ~w.~: · · ACOUSTIC SYSTEM PLAN ~o~,~,~o [M Northeast LLC ~v Dn~ ~v ~xr~ OD ~o su,,~s~ .~, FHE PRESBYTERIAN LI13807C ~t: ~ ~v~, ~v ~m* CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE WILLIAM ~ COLLINS, AIA ASNOTED PR~ECTADDR~S: ~o,~ ~,~ ~*~: ~,,~ CUTCH~UE, NY 11935 ~ SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" Ils/ II II II II ~ Li II II El ~)_ NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" ~ o..~ .1'...Mobile....,,.~.~,,.. ~ °'"~"~ GD ~ su.m~ ,~. T~ PRESBYTERIAN LZ~ 3807C ~: ~,E~ ~,.., ,,7~, CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE ~..o: ~v. vo,c~ ~,~. ~ ~,~,, CUTCH~UE, NY 11935 ~ SO~EA~ ELEVA~ON ~ NO~ST ELEVAT~N nD 3~o SU,,,SE H~. T~ PRESBYTERIAN LI13807C -- CEMENlI1]OUS SIMULA'1ED CEDAR SHINGLES ' PLYWOOD SHEATHING RAF'i'~RS O 16# O.C. HEADER INTERIOR DOOR CI.~NG (TYPE TO BE SELECTED AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE: wrl'H TOWN SOUND ORDINANCE) -- III ~111 Ill III III III III X 4 WOOD POSTS SPACED AS SHOWN ON PLAN wrrH 2 x 4 STUDS AT 16' O.C. BETWEEN ASSEMBLY CONSISI'ING OF (2) 2 X 12 WlI'H ~' PLYWOOD SHIM. SPANNING BE'~ VERIlCAL 8' THICK, 4000 PSI O 28 DAYS AIR-ENIla. AINED POURED COHCRE'IE PAD W1114 HAUNCH AT PERIMETER. NOTE: ALL LUMBER TO ACQ TREATEO ._ .T. ·Mobile il ~,~ · · SECTION ACOUSTIC S/STEM [M Northeast LLC m GD ~5oo su,m[ ,~, T~ PRESBYTERIAN SUrf[ D-203 ~: ~mx ~,, ,~ .m C~RCH OF CUTCHOG~ WILLIAM F COLLINS, AIA Ag NOTED ?ROJE~ADD~S: ARC H I i E C ~ S' LLP .................................... 27245 MAIN ~ vo,ct ~,,~ ~*~ *~,~, CUTCH~UE, NY 11935 Note to File: The applicant submitted revised plans and responses to the letter dated May 12th 2010 and Walter Coopers comments. I discussed the issue of noise mitigation with both the applicant and Mike verity to be sure the what they were proposing would meet zoning 9oringiankly it was a wall like structure). As proposed, an enclosure having a roof would be considered an accessory structure meeting setbacks and ok. Mike Verity on May 17, 2010 said that what he reviewed was adequate and that he would certify the plans when appropriate. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND May 12, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Amato & Associates, P.C. Att: Gregory R. Alvarez 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration T-mobile Northeast, LLC at Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Alvarez; I'm writing as a follow up to the Planning Board work session held May 10, 2010 in connection to the above referenced application. As per our discussion on this matter, the Planning Board will be reviewing the consultant's comments, as well as the information provided by your client and will provide further instruction after next week's work session scheduled on May 17, 2010. For your convenience I have attached the supplemental review to our RF consultant's comments. Please review them and prepare a response to be reviewed by the Board in addition to a rendering of how the new equipment area will look at the site with elevation details. Should you have any question or need clarification on the above matter, please contact me anytime to discuss the matter. Sincerely, Kristy Winser, Senior Planner CCi Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Walter A. Cooper Radio Frequency Planning & Consultation 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 757-220-9442 May7, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winscr Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Via o-mail RE: Town of Southold - T-Mobile Northeast LLC (FICA Omnipoint) at the Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutehogue ScrMg1000-102-147.1 Dear Ms. Wiuser: I have reviewed the letter from Amato & Associates (with attachments) dated May 4, 2010 and the revised site plans dated May 5, 2010. These documents address most of the concerns raised in previous reviews, however some issues remain. These are addressed below. The revised site plans Provide specificatious for safety signage as required by §280- 70M(1)b. The plans also refer to a "..,site specific RF EMS safety plan on file with building management,.," but no copy of this plan appears to be included with the application, The letter from Amato & Associates states that "...in connection with the request for the RF safety plan; this item is actually the Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions, prepared by Scinetics Corporation..." The Scineties report is not a safety plan. It is; as stated on its title page, an "evaluation of radio frequaney emissions..." A safety plan typically address access control and other procedures to ensure the continued safety of the applicant's employees, building employees, first responders and the general public who may have reason to be in the near vicinity of the facility's antennas. To cite just a few examples, such a plan would include a requirement for keeping the access door to the steeple locked (and perhaps alarmed) to preclude inadvertent entry by persous not trained in RF safety techniques. It would also include procedures to have the a'ansmitters turned off when T-Mobile employees or building stsffneed.to perform maintenance or other work in, or directly outside, the steeple. The plan should also include specific emergency procedures for shutting down the facility during an emergency, such as a fire or natural disaster, when first Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold May 7, 2010 Page 2 responders may have to enter the steeple or equipment area. The Scinetics report clearly does not address any of these issues. Site RF safety plans are routinely prepared and issued by wireless operators, especially when facilities are locfited in buildings and other locations not under the exclusive control of the carrier. It would be surprising indeed if T-Mobile were unfamiliar with such a requirement. Recommendation: The Town should once again request that the applicant to provide an RF safety plan for review and for filing in building management office. The Second Supplemental Radio Frequency Affidavit dated April 29, 2010 (Nieto Affidavit) clarifies that T-Mobile's service deficiency is based on coverage and not capacity. Unfortunately, the affidavit still does not fully clarify T-Mobile's eovemge objective in the claimed "gap" area. In the affidavit, Ms. Nieto variously states that"...the si?al required in and around the site [is] -76 dBm..." that ".~.T-Mobile's required sign~ sirength is at -76 dBm, which is an in-building coverage level..." that "the ' primary objective for T-Mobile within theCutchogue area is to supply both in-vehicle coverage along Main Road, as well as in-building coverage within the surrounding structures" and that "[the] location [will] provide seamless, ubiquitous...cow~.age..." These statements seem vague, confusing and self-contradictory. Are only some buildings and some roads in the gap area to be covered? If so, which ones and where? Which buildings are tho "surrounding" buildings? How far along Main Road is in-vehicle coverage required? Is coverage not required on other roads as well? What is "seamless, ubiquitous coverage?" How is it provided if only the "surrounding" buildings and some roads are covered? For that matter, the gap that the applicant seeks to remedy has still not been clearly defined. Is it the area depicted on the ini~ propagation maps as lacki~, g coverage at -76 dBm (in-building) or the area shown as lacking coverage at -84 dBm (in-vehicle) or is it some combination? Are there two gap areas--one for vehicles and one for buildings? Ms. Nieto's statement that existence of the deficiency is based oa "... personal knowledge gained through computer modeling ..." also lacks clarity and detail. What computer model was used? How was the model calibrated for local conditions? Were drive tests conducted? What other information was used to confirm the conclusions provided by the model? Did she conduct in-building signal strength measurements? Were customer complaint togs and lost and dropped call statistics from adjacent sites consulted? What did they show? Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold May 7, 2010 Page 3 Ms. Nieto also incorrectly states that "..'.Mr. Cooper concludes that the Application should be denied." I have not reached any such conclusion. My goal has been to assist the Town in understanding the applicant's needs and whether or not the proposed facility will meet those needs in the least obtrusive manner in accordance with the Town's zoning regulations. Having this information presented clearly, completely and unambiguously is in the best interests of both the Town and the applicant. A clear, complete and unambiguous record will reduce the chances for misinformed or inappropriate conclusions and will minimize the likelihood of future challenges to the Town's ultimate decision in this matter. Recommendation: The Town should carefully consider all of the information regarding demonstration of need and the adequacy of the proposed facility presented in the applications documents and at hearings. If the Town finds that information address the above questions to its satisfaction, it should take final action on the application. Othenvise, the Town should require the applicant to provide the required information before acting. I regret any confusion or misunderstanding that may have been caused my lack of knowledge of uny new or material information presented at public hearings. Meanwhile, please let me know if there are any questions or comments. Very Italy yours, Walter A. Cooper Winser, Krist~ From: Sent: To: Subject: Gregory Alvarez [galvarez@amatofirm.com] Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:27 AM Winser, Kristy RE: Cutchogue Pres. T-mobile Thank you. Gregory R. Alvarez Associate Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Phone: (516) 227-6363 Fax: (516) 227-6367 E-Mail: galvarez@amatofirm.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information from the law firm of Amato & Associates, PC. This e-mail and any files attached may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please forward same to sender and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. ..... Original Message ..... From: Winser, Kristy [mailto:kristy.winser@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:27 AM To: Gregory Alvarez Subject: Cutchogue Pres. T-mobile Hi Greg' In connection to the PB work session held Monday 10, 2010, attached is the report from Walter Cooper for your review. As discussed, please provide further detail for the compound area and provide responses to . the attached letter to be reviewed during work session May 17, 2010 @ 4pm. Let me know if you have any questions on this. have a good day. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.winser@town.southold.ny.us <<Southold Omnipoint Pres Church 5 7 10 Rpt 4 .pdf>> Winser, Krist~ From: Sent: To: Subject: Winser, Kristy Tuesday, May 11,2010 11:27 AM Gregory Alvarez (E-mail) Cutchogue Pres. T-mobile Hi Greg' In connection to the PB work session held Monday 10, 2010, attached is the report from Walter Cooper for your review. As discussed, please provide further detail for the compound area and provide responses to the attached letter to be reviewed during work session May 17, 2010 @ 4pm. Let me know if you have any questions on this. have a good day. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy. Winser~,town.southold.ny.us ~outhold Omnipoint Pres Church... WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, May 10, 20'10 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda 4:45 p.m. Site Plans & Subdivisions Proje_ct name: *~ - M o b i I ~ -I{I-o--r t ~'~-t ............. --~'~-(~-f ~-i-1 .~._0_-0_-i~_'~:~i"~]i~;1_i ........... ._-_"iiiiiii~iii Location: The Presbyterian Church or Soc!_e._~ of Cutcho. gue, 27245 Main Road Description: The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless communication facility having interior mounted antennae within an existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing ...................................... j ch___urc__h_.b_u, ilding on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. S__ta_t_u.s_: .................................. ~,. Site Plan review Action: Review new submission. _A_tt_ac__h__m_e_nts: .......... ' Letter from A..p_plicant; Hand-Out Packet Project name: Location: i Connecticut Municipal Energy SCTM#: i 1000-6-8-7 & 3.2 Co_opera_t_ive ..................... }_ ............................. 1866 Central A_ve. F!shers. Island_ ............................... Addition of 993 sq. ft. to the existing 7,144 sq. ft. diesel-electric generator Description: ~_[acility on a 47, 441 sq. ft. parcel located in the Business District. -S-t~-t~-S? ...................... U_Site Plan review ................................. -~-ion: .............................. T Re~-ci~a-ff--Z~-~-~-°~n-~n~' ~g-P~ P~r~-~,-'~ ~'i~ comments, Attachments: Draft ZBA Comments _Project-n"~':- .......... Aries Estates/Tully I SCTM#: {-~00-22-3~ ............................... Location: The property is located at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way which extends north from Kayleigh's Court in East Marion. Description: This proposal is for a standard subdivision of an 11.4418-acre parcel into two lots, where Lot 1 equals 3.7362 acres, including 1.4354 acres of open space, and Lot 2 equals 7.6786 acres, including 5.0872 acres of open space in the R-80 Zoning District. i Status: .............................................. i ~_k~e t c_h_~ p ro__va ! ............................................................... A__c.t.!o_n_: .................. j....~_i.s._c u_s_As~j t_~. vi_ s_it_. · Attachments: ~ None For Discussion: 4/12/10 request from Thomas Uhl, Flower Hill Building Corp., to replace two dead pear trees with two rhubrum maple trees on the southeast corner of Jasmine and Blossom Lanes in the Beach Plum Homes conservation subdivision. Walter A. Cooper Radio Frequency Planning & Consultation 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 757-220-9442 May 7, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Viae-mail RE: Town of Southold - T-Mobile Northeast LLC (FKA Omnipoint) at the Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-1-17.1 Dear Ms. Winser: 1 have reviewed the letter from Amato & Associates (with attachments) dated May 4, 2010 and the revised site plans dated May 5, 2010. These documents address most of the concerns raised in previous reviews, however some issues remain. These are addressed below. 1. The revised site plans provide specifications for safety signage as required by §280- 70M(1)b. The plans also refer to a "...site specific RF EMS safety plan on file with building management..." but no copy of this plan appears to be included with the application. The letter from Amato & Associates states that "...in connection with the request for the RF safety plan, this item is actually the Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions, prepared by Scinetics Corporation..." The Scinetics report is not a safety plan. It is, as stated on its title page, an "evaluation of radio frequency emissions..." A safety plan typically address access control and other procedures to ensure the continued safety of the applicant's employees, building employees, first responders and the general public who may have reason to be in the near vicinity of the facility's antennas. To cite just a few examples, such a plan would include a requirement for keeping the access door to the steeple locked (and perhaps alarmed) to preclude inadvertent entry by persons not trained in RF safety techniques. It would also include procedures to have the transmitters turned offwhen T-Mobile employees or building staff need to perform maintenance or other work in, or directly outside, the steeple. The plan should also include specific emergency procedures for shutting down the facility during an emergency, such as a fire or natural disaster, when first Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold May 7, 2010 Page 2 responders may have to enter the steeple or equipment area. The Scinetics report clearly does not address any of these issues. Site RF safety plans are routinely prepared and issued by wireless operators, especially when facilities are located in buildings and other locations not under the exclusive control of the carrier. It would be surprising indeed if T-Mobile were unfamiliar with such a requirement. Recommendation: The Town should once again request that the applicant to provide an RF safety plan for review and for filing in building management office. 2. The Second Supplemental Radio Frequency Affidavit dated April 29, 2010 (Nieto Affidavit) clarifies that T-Mobile's service deficiency is based on coverage and not capacity. Unfortunately, the affidavit still does not fully clarify T-Mobile's coverage objective in the claimed "gap" area. In the affidavit, Ms. Nieto variously states that"...the signal required in and around the site [is] -76 dBm..." that "...T-Mobile's required signal strength is at -76 dBm, which is an in-building coverage level..." that "the primary objective for T-Mobile within the Cutchogne area is to supply both in-vehicle coverage along Main Road, as well as in-building coverage within the surrounding structures" and that "[the] location [will] provide seamless, ubiquitous...coverage..." These statements seem vague, confusing and self-contradictory. Are only some buildings and some roads in the gap area to be covered? If so, which ones and where? Which buildings are the "surrounding" buildings? How far along Main Road is in-vehicle coverage required? Is coverage not required on other roads as well? What is "seamless, ubiquitous coverage?" How is it provided if only the "surrounding" buildings and some roads are covered? For that matter, the gap that the applicant seeks to remedy has still not been clearly defined. Is it the area depicted on the initial propagation maps as lacking coverage at -76 dBm (in-building) or the area shown as lacking coverage at -84 dBm (in-vehicle) or is it some combination? Are there two gap areas--one for vehicles and one for buildings? Ms. Nieto's statement that existence of the deficiency is based on "... personal knowledge gained through computer modeling ..." also lacks clarity and detail. What computer model was used? How was the model calibrated for local conditions? Were drive tests conducted? What other information was used to confirm the conclusions provided by the model? Did she conduct in-building signal strength measurements? Were customer complaint logs and lost and dropped call statistics from adjacent sites consulted? What did they show? Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold May 7, 2010 Page 3 Ms. Nieto also incorrectly states that "...Mr. Cooper concludes that the Application should be denied." I have not reached any such conclusion. My goal has been to assist the Town in understanding the applicant's needs and whether or not the proposed facility will meet those needs in the least obtrusive manner in accordance with the Town's zoning regulations. Having this infonuation presented clearly, completely and unambiguously is in the best interests of both the Town and the applicant. A clear, complete and unambiguous record will reduce the chances for misinformed or inappropriate conclusions and will minimize the likelihood of future challenges to the Town's ultimate decision in this matter. Recommendation: The Town should carefully consider all of the information regarding demonstration of need and the adequacy of the proposed facility presented in the applications documents and at hearings. If the Town finds that information address the above questions to its satisfaction, it should take final action on the application. Otherwise, the Town should require the applicant to provide the required information before acting. I regret any confusion or misunderstanding that may have been caused my lack of knowledge of any new or material information presented at public hearings. Meanwhile, please let me know if there are any questions or comments. Very truly yours, Walter A. Cooper PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 1197! OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY T~lephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 6, 2010 Mr. Walter A. Cooper 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 Re: Site Plan & Special Exception Application for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC Located at the Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Cooper: Enclosed please find hard copies of materials submitted to our office on May 5th regarding the above-referenced site plan which have also been e-mailed to you. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Encs. TRANSMITTAL WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA TO: ADDRESS: ATTENTION: FROM: DATE: RE: PROJECT NO: Amato & Associates 666 Old Country Road Garden City, NY 11530 Kristy Winser- Town of Southold Planning Dept. Isabella Mancini May 5, 2010 LI-13-807-C 07-7199 -- ITEMS TO BE TRANSMITTED: (9) Sets of Signed & Sealed Zoning Drawing Issued for Filing Ioq. COMMENTS: VIA: UPS Overnight CC: File/7199/im 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 E-MAlL: mail~wfcaia.com 405 LEXINGTON AVE CHRYSLER BLDG, 26TH FLR NEW YORK, NY 10174 TEL: (212) FAX: (212) 485-6001 & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK 11530 TEL: (516) 2276363 FAX: (516) 227-6367 402 MAIN ST. SUITE 204 METUCHEN, NJ 08840 TEL: (732) 317-1511 May 4, 2010 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Kristy Winser Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc.'s ("T-Mobile") Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility (the "Communication Facility") to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17.1 (the "Property") T-Mobile Site Ref.: LI- 13 -807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103 -400 Dear Ms. Winser: Following up on your correspondence dated April 22, 2010, enclosed are nine (9) copies of following materials which address each of the items requested in your e-mail: Additional copies of the required sketches depicting the reference points utilized in the Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions, prepared by Scinetics Corporation. Second Supplemental RF Affidavit, executed by Mariana Nieto, T-Mobile's RF engineer, to address the comments from Walter A. Cooper, in correspondence dated Apri! 20, 2010. Acoustical Study, prepared by JRH Acoustical Consulting, Inc., to address the anticipated sound emissions from the equipment compound as designed, and to set forth the mitigation measures to be employed to ensure that the anticipated sound levels will not exceed the standard set forth in Town Code § 270-71.A.(2)(a)[2] [d]. Drawing, prepared by William F. Collins, A1A, Architects, LLP, updated to depict the mitigation measures to be employed in order to ensure that the sound levels from the Communication Facility will not exceed the standards set forth in Town Code § 270-71.A.(2)(a)[2][d] (to be provided under separate cover). Please note that in connection with the request for the RF safety plan, this item is actually the Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions, prepared by Scinetics Corporation, which has been A1VLATO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. previously submitted to the Planning Board. In the event additional copies are required, please let us know. Provided everything is in proper order, ~ve ask that the Application be scheduled for the next available Planning Board agenda on May 10, 2010, to discuss any remaining issues regarding this matter, and to be set for decision. lfyou have any questions, or require anything additional, please let us know. Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez Encls. CC; Tim Fincham (via email, w/out encls.) Wayne Smith (via email, w/out encls.) Gina Jacobellis (via email, w/out encls.) 2 ~H ACOUSTICAL CONSULTING, INC. Phone 212-246-6727 Fax 212-246-3142 Emall:John@Jmac.com www.)rhac.com May 3, 2010 Ms. Gina ]acobellis William F. Collins Architects, LLP 10-1 Technology Drive Setauket, NY 11733 Re: T-Mobile - Presbyterian Church - Site No L/-13-807-C (07-7199) Cutchogue, NY 3RHAC 3ob #2614 Dear Ms. ]acobellis: In response to your request, We have reviewed the filing plans dated 2/22/10, and have analyzed the equipment acoustical data for the cellular communication equipment for site No. !_I 13-807-C proposed for a location behind The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue located at 27245 Main Road, in Cutchogue, NY. The sound-emitting telephone equipment cabinets, battery backup cabinet, and UMTS cabinet will be located on grade. The nearest church-owned residential property line is approximately 15 feet from the proposed equipment. The property line of the next nearest property to the northwest is approximately 74 feet from the proposed equipment. At your request, we evaluated the existing nighttime sound levels at the site for comparison with the Town of Southold's Code requirement (section 280-70 I (5)) of 45 dB(A) at a distance of 10 feet from the equipment fencing. We also analyzed potential mitigative treatments to reduce the equipment sound levels to meet the requirement of 45 dB(A). This report summarizes our findings, comments, and recommendations. A. Existing Ambient Sound Levels We conducted an acoustical survey of sound levels on April 28t~ and April 29~ for a continuous period of approximately 19 hours. Monitoring began on 4/28/10 at approximately 1:45pm and ended on 4/29/10 at approximately 9:30am. The weather conditions were dry and windy for the beginning and end of the measurements. However, to reduce the effect of wind on the microphone, the monitoring equipment was placed on the north east of the side of the one-story addition to the church. While the measurement location was closer and more exposed to the Route 25, the contribution from traffic was negligible during the nighttime hours when traffic noise was sporadic. To verify this, the writer visited the site from approximately 12:00am to 12:30am. Further, wind during the overnight hours was diminished, and hence had no effect on these readings. The monitoring indicated that from approximately 12'.30am to 3:30am, the average ambient noise level at the measurement location remained at approximately 45 dB(A). These readings were averaged over 1/2 hour periods to factor out higher transient sounds from nearby activities such as car pass-by events. B. Town of Southold Code The Town of Southold Code section 280-70 I (5), requires that noise from base equipment, including any backup generator, measures less than 45dB(A) at a distance of 10 feet from the equipment shelter, or in this case, the fenced enclosure. This requirement correlates well with the measured ambient noise levels near this site. William F. Collins Architects, LLP Re: T-Mobile - Presbyterian Church - Site No LI-13-807-C (07-7199) May 3, 2010 Page 2 Analysis of Proposed Sound Emitting Equipment The proposed facility consists of a total of four sound emitting cabinets. This group includes two sound-emitting telephone equipment cabinets (Nortel GSM BTS S18020), one battery backup cabinet (Magnetek MPE5566), and one UMTS cabinet (Ericsson RBS 3106). The equipment cabinets were evaluated for their sound level at a distance of 10 feet from the containment fence. A plan showing the equipment locations and distances to the nearest property lines is provided in Figure 1, Appendix A. The drawings currently show that equipment cabinets will be surrounded by a 6 ft. high vinyl fence. The following basic sound data has been provided for each type of equipment. Each Telephone equipment cabinet (Nortel GSM BTS S18020) ...... 70 dB(A) at 3 feet Battery backup cabinet (Magnetek MPE5566) .................. 69 dB(A) at 3 feet UMTS cabinet (Ericsson RBS 3106) ................. 85 dB(A) sound power rating In the calculations, we accounted only for the sound attenuation due to the distance of each cabinet to the property line and for the 6 ft high vinyl fence. Uttle or no sound attenuation is afforded by the new shrubbery. The fence, if made solid, would provide approximately 5 dB(A) barrier attenuation. The expected equipment sound levels at a distance of 10 feet from the fence enclosure are expected to be as follows.. (2) Telephone Equipment Cabinets ................................ 55 dB(A) Battery Backup Cabinet ........................................ 54 dB(A) UMTS Cabinet ............................................... 60 dB(A) All equipment together ......................................... 62 dB(A) The UMTS cabinet is clearly the dominant sound source within the equipment group and controls the combined equipment sound level. The combined sound level of all equipment at 10 feet from the fence will approximate 62 dB(A), or 17 dB(A) above the code required level of 45 dB(A). RecommendaUons for Mitigation To reduce equipment sound levels to 45 dB(A), we would recommend the following treatments. Provide a ~.0 ft. high solid barrier fence around the equipment. The fence shall have no gaps and shall extend to the ground. A 4" thick barrier/absorber panel system such as United McGill Soundscreen shall be used, and that has a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) of 40 and a Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) of 1.09. Figure 2, in Appendix A, shows the extent of the recommended treatment. Appendix B includes manufacturer's literature for the proposed barrier enclosure panels. 2. Reorient the equipment cabinets so that the face emitting the highest acoustic energy faces southwest, away from the nearest property line. William F. Collins Architects, LLP Re: T-Mobile - Presbyterian Church - Site No LI-13-807-C (07-7199) May 3, 2010 Page 3 With the above treatments implemented, the noise level is expected to meet the Town's Code requirement of 45 dB(A) at a distance of 10 feet from the barrier enclosure as specified above. Consequently, the equipment noise at the nearest property line is expected to approximate the nighttime ambient sound levels at both the property line of the church-owned property and the nearest non-church property line to the northwest, and should therefore not be objectionable. We trust the above is clear. However, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, .lohn R. Hauenstein President Attachments Appendix A Ambient Measurement Location Provide Solid 10 fi high sound absorbing barrier extending to the ground. Minimum STC of 40, and minimum NRC of ! 09 The perforated s~de of the panels shall ,face the equipment SCALE: !":1'-( ANTENNA Soundscreen"" Panel Systems Prefabricated Acoustical Panel Systems for AcousticaL EncLosure and Barrier WaLL Systems a McGiLI, AtrSitenceTM product United McGitt® products Every industrial noise problem has a variety of possible solutions with different cost/benefit options. Each project for which prefabricated acoustical panels are used has its own assembly, performance, equipment access, and mainte- nance requirements. That is why McGill ^irSilence offers three different acoustical panel products that can be integrated into a variety of packages. They combine state-of-the-art acoustical technology and materials to with- stand the harsh environments and rough use associated with industrial manufacturing. McGill AirSilenee's Type SL, TG, and RR acoustical panel systems give you consistently high quality and excellent performance at an econornica~ price· McGiI[ AirSilence offers a comprehensive line of products. Our sales representatives, and sales and engineering staff welcome the chance to match your noise control problem with our products and allow you to make the decision about which solution best meets your needs, performance requirements, and budget. This brochure has been prepared as an ovewiew of all Soundscreen acoustical panel systems and accessories. For more complete information including specifications, pricing, and delivery, or information about other noise control products, please contact McGill AirSilence. [nstaUatlon Sequence 1. Locate base channel. 2. Set corner panels. 3. Install wall, partilion, and door panels. 4. Add wall trim~utside and inside. 5. Optional structural steel (as required). 6. Acid roof panels. 7. Add roof trim~utside and inside. 8. Completed enclosure. II ......... ITII I11111 (~ 2006 McGill AirSilence I~C ~l~ ~[~c~ [1~ Type SL--Snap-Lock 3oJnt Construction The Type SL panel system incorporates a mechanically self-locking feature, which allows adjacent panels to be snap-locked together, forming structurally sound, full-length panel-to- panel joints. The self-locking feature eliminates the need to install sheet metal screws at the panel joints, a time consuming task in the erec- tion of standard tongue-and-groove and fi-con- nector panel systems. Compared with other systems, this self-locking feature reduces instal- lation time by about 20 percent. Type TG--Tongue-and-Groove 3oJnt Construction The Type TG panel system features a slip-fit tongue-and-greove joint. Type RR--RapJd Removabl. e 3otnt Construction The Type RR system features removable panels. All of the panels fit into drop-in channel frames. Typical Uses and Benefits of McGtLL Acoustical Panet S~tems Type SL · Permanent installations Type SL panel systems am not intended for use in projects in which future disassembly and re-erection may be required. *Rapid panel mlsembly time The snap-lock feature eliminates the need for jolnt-te-joint sheet metal screws and speeds assembly. .~isually appealing panel-to-panel joints The elimination of sheet metal screws at joints provides an attractive assembled enclosure. Type TG · Semi-permanent installations Type TG panel systems allow future disassembly and m-emc'tion. Type RR °Movable installations Type RR systems provide superior flexibility and ease of relocation. · Quick access to machinery Removal and re-installation of individual panels or entire wall surfaces is fast and easy. °Adaptable to "close quarters" More permanent acoustical enclosure systems must provide walkway clearance around interior machinery for maintenance access. This uses up valuable floorspace. The ease of removal and re-installation of RR panel systems eliminates this requirement, allowing an RR panel enclosure to occupy a smaller amount of floorspace. Self-locking recess Tongue end of panel ! - Groove end of panel Acoustical caulking Acoustical caulking ~,T°igue e~d °f panelsheet metal screws Groove end of panel ........... I!111'1111 RR side panel -- (FRBS gasket) RR side panel Lift-out roof panel Stop ~- angle ~/~._ J ~ Neoprene pane -~ / ~FURIbBsSe~la~,~:tl~et [x~/ In~ert, lift, and drop RR panel -'~ ~ I- channel Top View Side View Solid steel outer shell Acoustical/lhermal insulatng fill Solid steel outer shell Perforated steel inner liner Acoustical/thermal insulatng fill Optional perforated steel inner liner Foam rubber bulb seal gasket (FRBS gasket) Standard Panel. Construction Standard Type SL, TG, and RR panets are the basic building blocks of all Soundscreen acous- tical enclosures. The standard panel for Type SL, TG, and RR systems consists of a sandwich con- struction of either an 18, 20, or 22-gauge galva- nized solid steel outer shell, acoustical/thermal insulating fill, and (optional for the RR panel) a 22-gauge minimum, perforated, galvanized steel inner liner. All longitudina[ joining channels and internal reinforcing members in Type SL and TG panels are fabricated from a minimum 18-gauge, ga]vanized steel. Other skin materials are available including paintable gatvanzied steel, types 304 and 316 stainless steel, and aluminum. Septum panels (with an interior dividing sheet) and panels with solid metal outer and inner shells are also available. ]nsulaUon The acoustical/thermal insulating fill used in all standard Soundscreen panels is glass fiber insulation. It will not settle or promote the growth or bacteria, mold, vermin, or insects. The insulation used in the RR panels without the optiona~ perforated galvanized steel inner liner has an acrylic coating to minimize loose fibers and erosion. Surface Bumtng Characteristics All insulating materials, inner and outer surfaces, and acoustical caulking used in Sooadscree~ panels meet the requirements of NFPA-90A. Accessories Heating, cooling and ventilation systems, electrical systems, factory paint finishes, and lel~communications connectors can be furnished. Acoust~cat Doors All SOUNDSCREEN enclosure systems can be furnished with a wide variety of acoustical doors. These include versions for personnel and industrial applications such as material and machinery access. Standard personnel doors are 36 inches wide by 80 inches high and can be supplied with a 24-inch by 30-inch safety glass vision pane] with neoprene acoustical edges and bottom seals. Doors are pre-hung, insulated, and equipped with two hinges, one industrial door latch (with inside personnel safety release), and gasketing. Doors are also available in singJe- and clou- hie-leaf hinged, right- and left-hand swings, sin- gle- and double-horizontal slide, vertical slide, bifold constructions, and manual and automati- cally operated versions. Observation windows can be provided in all doors. Observation Windows Standard observation windows for Type SL, TG, and RR panel systems are constructed of double- pane, 1/4-inch-thick safety glass held in place with neoprene acoustical seals and separated by an air space of the same thickness as the panel. Other optional window materials and optional window configurations are available. Panel Available Standard Maximum Type Thicknesses Manufactured Widths~ Standard Len~dh SL 4 and 2 inches 24 and 36 inches 16 feet TG 4 and 2 inches 24 and 36 inches 12 feet RR~ 4 and 2 inches up to 16 inches 8 feet For most assemblies, at least one panel with a r~nstandard manu faciured width will be ~cluimd to complete the specified lengths of each wall, fl~or, or roof assembly. Long~' lengths are available by special orclef. Type RR panels in 4- and 2-1nch thicknesse~ are provided with one foam rubber bulb seal gasket on each length side of each panel. 0 2006 McGill AirSilence LL¢ An enterprise of United McGill Corporation Founded in 1951 2400 Fairwood Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43207-2700 614/443-5520, Fax: 614/542 2620 Elmail: sales@mcgillairsi[ence.com Web site: mcgillairsilence.com Form No.: MASIL-SPS Rev. I 6/06 McGill Corporation SOUNDSCREEN® Panel Systems Type SL Suggested Specifications for Type SL Acoustical Enclosures and Barrier Walls General Double-wall, insulated, acoustical enclosures and/or barrier walls shall be provided as indicated on the drawings. All panels and components shall be prefabricated and supplied by a nation- ally recognized man ufacturer with pub- lished standards ot construction, assembly, and technical performance. The manufacturer shall have produced a standardized prefabricated panel system for at least 10 years. Performance of the installed system and components shall conform strictly to all specifications listed herein. Pan- els and components shall not be sus- ceptible to damage from extended exposure to vibration, air temperature, or humidity with the passage of time. Joint Construction Panels shall be of special tongue-and- groove construction, with adjacent panels held together rigidly with an integral, continuous self-locking joint, on both inside and outside panel surfaces. Panel Construction 1, All panels shall be 2 or 4 inches thick, as noted on the drawings, with a solid galvanized steel exterior shell and a galvanized steel interior shell, solid or perforated, as noted on the drawings. 2. The exterior and interior shells shall be tack- or spot-welded to perimeter and internal longitudinal steel chan- nels and box-end internal closures in such a manner and spacing that no failure of the panel assembly will occur al the maximum operating loads specified in the structural performance section of these 8. Each panel shall be completely filled with acoustical insulating matedai that is noncombustible, inert, mil- dew-resistant, and vermin-proof. Insulation shall not settle within the panel assembly. No insulating mate- rials shall be used that have a flame spread rating greater than 25, or a smoke developed ra§ng greater than specifications. ~tan- 3. The galvanized steel exterior shell ~ ...... ~ ............ '~ thickness shall be 18-gauge min~fied on lhe drawing~. imum. 4. The galvanized steel interior ~~s~ '~ thickness shall be 22-gauge rt~l~~;~,~, ~,,~"~,%~'~ imum. 5. Where perforated material is ,~'t~; cared on the drawings, all perfora~ she~s~teel interior sheet t~ons shall be 3/32-inch-diameter ~ shall be acoustically ~aled. ~ r~nd bales on 3/16-inch staggered ~ ~ centers and shall result in a maxi* ~ ~ ~. ~. mum o~n area of 23 parent. -'*' Comp a lation 6. All perimeter and internal longitudi- nal steel channel members shall be ASTM Type A-446 18-gauge struc- tural-quality galvanized steel or equivalent. 7. All steel panel surfaces, internal channels, and trim items shall be fabricated from zinc-coated steel with a hot-dipped galvanized coat- ing resulting in a minimum G-90 coating class as determined by ASTM A-525 and shall meal all requirements of ASTM A-526 for commercial-quality galvanized car- ben steel. All base channels shall be installed on a level and true concrete base. Spacing of base channel attach- ments shall be as outlined in the manutacturer's standard details of assembly. All assembly trim items shall be of 18-gauge minimum hot-dipped gal- vanized steel and shall be furnished in standard lengths to be field-cut to required dimensions. Spacing of sheet metal screws and trim require- ments shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's published erec- tion and installation details. 3.Ail external panel joints, external trim, base channel/panel interfaces, base channel/floor interfaces, and shall have minimum sourld absorption coefficients as follows: other sections as noted on the draw- ings shall be sealed with an Under- writers Laboratories (UL) classified ..... sealer, having a flame spread rating Table I not greater than 25, and a smoke developed rating not greater than 50, as determined by ASTM Stan- dard E-84 (UL 723, NFPA255) Suf ficient sealer shall be used te extrude surplus sealer and give a visuaI indication of complete cover- age in ali joints Structural Performance 1 Special loadin9 situations including wind, snow, and equipment loads shall be provided for as indicated on drawings. 2. Under the indicated loading condi lions, the entire acoustical enclo- sure and/or barrier wall system shall be self-supporting and/er will be supported as shown on the draw- ings. The installer shall furnish and assemble all structural members and pipe columns if required, in strict accordance with drawings and manufacturer's installation details. 3. Under the above loading conditions, the assembled structure shall not exhibit any panel joint deflection in excess of L/200, where L is the unsupported span length of any panel section in the completed Structure. Acoustical Performance I The manufacturer shall provide ret- tiffed independent testing data indi catJRg sound absorption and trans- mission Ir)ss characteristics of the panel assembly. When requested, the manufacturer shall arrange to have a copy of all pertinerit labera tory reports forwarded to the engineer. 2 When tested according to ANSPASTM Standard C423 66 or a subsequent l version of this standard, in a number 4 mounting position, the panel assembly Sound Absorption Coefficients Octave Band Number 2 3 4 5 6 7 I NRC CenterFrequen_cy(Hz) 125 250 500 1,000 2,000 4,0007 _Absorption Coefficients 4-l~ a 4-inch panel J constnJction 0.63 109 1 17 1.0R 1 03 0.97 ! 1 09 b 2-inch panel I I construction 0.20 0.63 1.01 1.06 096 0.90 I 0.92 3 When tested a~;co~dirtg lo ASTM E90-70 or a subsequent version of this stan- dard. the panel assembly shall have minimum airborne sound transmission loss as follows: Table 2 Center Frequency (Hz) 125 250 500 Sound Transmission Loss I Octave Band Number 2 3 4 5 6 7 I STC 1,000 2,000 4,0001J'-- TransmissJor, Loss (dB) I a, 4qnch panel I construction 19 27 40 53 58, 63 ! 40 b, 2, inch canal I construction 19 21 30 40 49 51 I 34 Thermal Performance 1 Insulating materials used in all prefabricated panel assemblies shall have the followmg rn:~xilrturrl thermal conductances ~nd thermal resislance (FI) at a mean temp(~rature of /5'F: Thermal Co~ductm*ce (Btu/hr ft~ ~F) j a ,'l tach panel ccnstrJctioq .0,06 Btu/h,' b ~ cch pa id! ccnstrLcton--0 2 Btu/hr ft~ 'F Table 3 R-Factor R-8 ~11 dears, wir~(t,ows, heating, ventilating systems, electrical systems, paintmg s. ccessory comlaonehte etc. shal! be provided in acco[dance with drawiegs Type RR--Rapid Removal Acoustical P~ne!~ Joint Construction The Type R R system features patented, removable panels. All of the panels fit into drop-in charmer frames. Panel Erection Sequence In the type RR panel assembly, the structural integrity of the system is provided by a tubular steel skeleton framing system that is erected first. Following the installation of appropri- ate system doors and windows, RR panels are lifted into the top channel, dropped into the base channel, and pushed against the adjacent panel. Acoustical caulking is not required cause noise isolation is provided by compressed gaskets in each panel. Sheet metal screws are not required at the panel-to-panel joint as the structural integrity of the system is provided by the preassembled tubular frame. Tubular Structural Frame System First, top and bottom tubes, cerner and intermediate posts, and any roof beams are field welded together. Next, door units are set in place in the frame assembly. Once the frame- work is standing and doors are in place, the panels can be set in the framework. oT~/pical Uses/Advantages RR Panel Systems · Movable installations--Type RR systems provide supedor flexibility and ease of relocation. · Instant access to machinery-- Removal and re-installation of individual panels or entire wall surfaces is fast and easy. · Adaptable to "close quarters"-- More permanent acoustical enclo- sure systems must provide walkway clearance around interior machinery for maintenance access. This uses up valuable floorspace. The ease of removal and re-installation of RR panel systems eliminates this require- ment, allowing an RR panel enclosure to occupy a smaller amount of floorspace. 4 Erection---Type RR Panel Lift-out Roof Tubing -- rede Gaskets ?' ?/ / Top View Lower Chann~ -~ insert. Lift, and Drop Typ~ RR--Rapid R~moval Ac~tstical Panel PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application of T-Mobile Northeast LLC, f/kaJa Omnipoint Communications, Inc., as Applicant, and the Presbyterian Church or Society of Cutchogue, as Owner for all necessary permits to construct, operateand maintain a public utility wireless communication facility located at: 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York known and designated as Suffolk County Property Tax Id. No.: District: 1000, Section: 102, Block: 1, Lot: 12 ("Property") SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RADIO FREQUENCY AFFIDAVIT STATE OFNEW YORK ) ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: MARIANA NIETO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer, employed by T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/kda Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (hereinafter "T-Mobile"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in wireless telephone network coverage and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna cell sites to remedy service deficiencies in wireless communications coverage. 2. I submit this Second Supplemental RF Affidavit in response to the correspondence from Walter A. Cooper, the Town of Southold's ("Town") radio frequency consultant, dated April 20, 2010 (the "Correspondence"). In addition, I submit this affidavit in support of T-Mobile's special exception and site plan application (the "Application") to the Town Planning Board with respect to the construction of a public utility wireless communication facility (the "Communication Facility"), designed to remedy a deficiency in wireless telephone network coverage that exists in the Cutchogue area, at the Property. 3. Mr. Cooper makes several points in the Correspondence. Each of the items referenced in the Correspondence has been addressed during the course of the hearing process before the Planning Board. 4. Regarding his first point, which sets forth that "there is no explanation of the applicant's objectives, standards and criteria for adequate signal strength, adequate capacity and/or reliability as required by § 280-74B(1)e." The correspondence continues by saying that "[w]ithout this information, the Town has no objective basis upon which to judge: (1) whether or not a significant service deficiency exists; (2) whether or not the proposed facility would adequately remedy the service deficiency, (if it exists); and, (3) whether or not the proposed facility is the least obtrusive alternative." 5. To the contrary, previously I had submitted to the Planning Board, along with my propagation maps, a Supplemental RF Affidavit, dated February 16, 2010, which confirms in paragraph 13 that "[t]here is a serious service deficiency in T-Mobile's wireless telephone coverage in the Town. A deficiency in coverage is evidenced by the inability to adequately transmit or receive calls, as detailed above." 6. Moreover, in paragraph 14 my Supplemental RF Affidavit, I provided that "[t]he deficiency in coverage that exists in the Town prevents T-Mobile from providing uniform, reliable, wireless coverage to public and private users, including, but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance, and emergency response services." 7. In addition, in paragraph 15 of my Supplemental RF Affidavit I noted that "[t]he deficiency in wireless service within the Town is ongoing and pervasive. I base this conclusion on personal knowledge gained through my use of computer modeling, which RF engineers employ to identify deficiencies in wireless coverage." 8. In addition to the above materials, at the January 11, 2010, public hearing before the Town Planning Board, I testified on behalf of the Application, and provided similar information as set forth above confirming the signal strength required in and around the site (-76 dBm), that there is no adequate signal strength currently around the Property and that there is unreliable coverage in and around the Property. 9. As for Mr. Cooper's assessment of the "least obtrusive alternative" within the area, in addition to the above materials, I have previously provided my original RF Affidavit, dated January 8, 2010, in conjunction with the Due Diligence Affidavit prepared by Jacob George, T-Mobile's site acquisition consultant, and dated August 19, 2009, to confirm the availability of other sites within the area around the Property. Please note that despite the fact that I found the two other potential sites within the area around the Property to be acceptable from an RF perspective, Mr. George ruled out those sites due to the lack of interest from the respective owners of the two alternative sites. 10. The Correspondence continues by asserting that "[t]he map of existing coverage shows substantial coverage within the described 'gap' area at -95 dBM." Mr. Cooper continues to opine that T-Mobile could make calls outdoors in and around the Property. As discussed during the January 11, 2010, public hearing, and as discussed above, T-Mobile's required signal strength is at -76 dBm, which is an in-building coverage level. Therefore, Mr. Cooper's statement, although true, does not take into the account the signal strength which T-Mobile -2- requires. 11. Mr. Cooper continues by inquiring "does the applicant intend to provide in- vehicle or in-building coverage throughout the Town? If so, how were the in-vehicle and in- building signal strength objective arrived at and why is it applicable in this case? Is there a lack of capacity? If so, what capacity is required to provide adequate and reliable service? How was this determined?" 12. To address the first question, in my Supplemental RF Affidavit, I noted in paragraph 19 that "the primary objective for T-Mobile within the Cutchogue area is to supply both in-vehicle coverage along Main Road, as well as in-building coverage within the surrounding structures." In fact, Amato & Associates, in its correspondence to the Planning Board on March 11, 2010, which submitted my Supplemental RF Affidavit, highlighted this paragraph to confirm T-Mobile's coverage needs. 13. Moreover, at the January 11, 2010, public hearing, which Mr. Cooper did not attend, I also testified to T-Mobile's in-vehicle and in-building needs in the area. 14. Regarding how I arrived at the required signal strength, I testified on January 11, 2010, that it is based on collected data and the industry standard to build at an in-building level of coverage. 15. Also, in response to the remainder of Mr. Cooper's questions in his Correspondence, I testified on January 11, 2010, that the site is intended for coverage, not capacity purposes. 16. In summary, Mr. Cooper concludes that the Application should be denied. Based on the above information, all of which has been previously provided and/or testified to, T-Mobile believes it has provided sufficient information required under the Town Code to demonstrate T- Mobile's need for coverage in the area around the Property, and that it is the least obtrusive adequate alternative, j CONCLUSION 17. Therefore, contrary to the assertions in the Correspondence, based on the foregoing data, maps and analysis, it is my professional opinion that: (i) there exists a serious deficiency in T-Mobile's wireless communications coverage within the Cutchogue search area; (ii) the alternative sites, which are located within one-half mile of the Property, are also suitable to remedy T-Mobile's service deficiency within the Cutchogue search area but are unavailable for leasing; and (iii) thus this Communication Facility is the best suited, feasible, available location to provide seamless, ubiquitous, reliable coverage within the Cutchogue search area. 18. Based on the foregoing, the Communication Facility should be favorably considered by the Planning Board and T-Mobile's requested Application should be granted. T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC By: '~~a Ni Name: eto Title: Radio Frequency Engineer Swom to before me this <~°l'~day o f Ap~fil, 2010 m~ta~lic Commission Expires -4- Fi§ute B Walter A. Cooper Radio Frequency Planning & Consultation 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 757-220-9442 April 20, 2010 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Viae-mail RE: Town of Southold - T-Mobile Northeast LLC (FKA Omnipoint) at the Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-1-17.1 Dear Ms. Winser: This report supplements my previous report dated April 16, 2010. I have received and reviewed the full affidavit of Mariana Nieto dated February 16, 2010, including the propagation maps at Exhibits A, B, C and D. The propagation maps show coverage at -75dBm, -85dBm and -95dBm as required by §280~74B(1)d, b~ut there is no explanation of the applicant's objectives, standards and criteria for adequate signal strength, adequate capacity and/or reliability as required by §280-74B(1)e. Without this information, the Town has no objective basis upon which to judge: (1) whether or not a significant service deficiency exists; (2) whether or not the proposed facility would adequately remedy the service deficiency, (if it exists); and, (3) whether or not the proposed facility is the least obtrusive alternative. In fact, based on the latest propagation maps submitted, it could be argued that T- Mobile is already providing service in the gap area. The map of existing coverage shows substantial coverage within the described "gap" area at -95 dBm. It is very likely that T-Mobile subscribers in the open (not in cars or buildings) could initiate, receive and maintain calls while in the area and could be "handed off' to adjacent facilities as they transited the area. Also, subscribers using "car kits" with external antennas or subscribers in buildings with "signal boosters" or bi-directional amplifiers would receive reliable service even within vehicles or buildings. The applicant has not explicitly stated its service objectives, standards and criteria, nor has it shown, in objective terms, how the existing coverage is deficient. For Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold April 20, 2010 Page 2 example, does the applicant intend to provide in-vehicle or in-building coverage throughout the Town? If so, how were the in-vehicle and in-building signal strength objective arrived at and why is it applicable in this case? Is there a lack of capacity? If so, what capacity is required to provide adequate and reliable service? How was this determined? The current maps suggest that there is coverage in the area and the applicant has presented no new or objective data to support its claim that a "serious service deficiency" exists in the Town. In my option, the Town, if it so chose, would be justified in denying the application on the basis that: (1) service is already being provided; (2) the applicant has not adequately demonstrated that the existing service is deficient; (3) the applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed facility will adequately remedy the deficiency; and, (4) the applicant has not demonstrated the proposed facility it is the least obtrusive adequate alternative. Very truly yours, Walter A. Cooper INVOICE Watter A. Cooper 117 Watnut Hitts Drive WiUlamsburg, VA 23185 757-220-9442 waltercooperC, vedzon net Reference No. SCTM# 109-2-17.1 9 / (P.O Town of Southold, New York Vendor Tax ID Number or Social Security Number Vendor N~me Walter A. Cooper Vendor Telephone Number Vendor Contact Invoice Invoice Invoice Number Date Total VendOr No. - Pa,,ment Voucher 35~ V~ndor Address 117 /4( zs Net Pumhase Order Amount Claimed Number Payee Certification The undersigned (Claimant) (Acting on behalf of the above named claimant) does hereby certify that the foregoing claim is true and correct, that no part has beell paid, except as therein stated, that the balance therein stated is actually due and owing, and that ~h the Town is exempt are excluded. Company Nam~---~ Department Certification I hereby certify that the ma~erialz above specified have been received by me in good condition without substitution, the serviccz properly p~-formed and that the quanl/~e~ thereof have been verffied with the exceptions or discrepanci~ noted, and payment is apln oved. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, April 19, 2010 4:00 p.m. Applications · ' t ~ SCTM#' 1 1000-109-2-17 1 Locat on The Presb~er an Church or Soc e~ of Cutchogue 27245 Main Road Description: i The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless i communication facility having interior mounted antennae within an existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church bud ng on a 0 91-acre s te located in the R-40 Zon ng District. ~.~p~r....~.at~d._ _4/~16/~1 ;~ '~'"'"': ~'-"-n Vine-ards SCTM#' i 1000 100-4-3 1 ~roJect name: ~ ~f-- ~( ~'"i~0cation: s/s/o Oregon Road, ~.,..1.....6_~:~3.~.i...~(.9 ' b~:ii~i~'~'i JS~:~'~a '~i~'e-~'i~'~or the as-built construction of four (4) bud ngs ' including a 1,646 sq. ff. wine making and wine tasting building with 336.3 i sq. ft. of deck, a 2,730 sq. ft. wine storage barn, an 884.1 sq. ft. accessory storage building and a 206.1 sq. ft. frame shed on a 979,664 sq. ft. (22.49 acres) parcel whereas, the development area is 53,078 sq. ft (1.21 acres) n the Agr cu tura Conservation D strict. Status: Site Plan Review ........................................................ ~{~ ~'~ ~'{~"'~ an & etter from Land Preservation. Attachments Staff Report Walter A. Cooper Radio Frequency Planning & Consultation 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 757-220-9442 April 16, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Via e-mail RE: Town of Southold - T-Mobile Northeast LLC (FKA Omnipoint) at the Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-1-17.1 Dear Ms. Winser: I have reviewed the revised site plans dated February 22, 2010 and the additional materials submitted for the proposed wireless facility. The following new and/or revised comments and recommendations are provided for your consideration. General Comment: The latest information submitted by the applicant appears to address most of the issues noted in previous reports. Some issues remain open as noted below. Specific Comments: The site plans indicate that the proposed facility would be less than 500 feet from adjacent residential property lines in violation of §280-70.1.(6). Since the facility, except for the outdoor pad-mounted equipment and external cable tray (which will be painted to match the exterior of the building), would be virtually invisible from the adjacent residences, it may not be visually objectionable. Assuming the Town is satisfied regarding the other environmental impacts (such as noise and electromagnetic radiation, as further discussed below), the Town may want to consider waiving the requirement. The revised site plans dated February 22, 2010 provide specifications for safety signage as required by §280-70M(1)b. The plans also refer to a "...site specific RF EMS safety plan on file with building management..." but no copy of this plan appears to be included with the application. Ms. Kfisty Winser Town of Southold April 16, 2010 Page 2 Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant to provide a copy of the RF safety plan for review. The revised "Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions" report prepared by Scinetix Corporation dated February 12, 2010 ("Scinetix Report") addresses the potential cumulative impact of a future co-locating carrier as required by 8280-70.1.(3). It also addresses additional points of interest, where the public may come into close proximity to the antennas. Nno sketches were provided to illustrate the relative locations of the various points of interest as required by §280-70J(3). Examples of the required sketches can be found in Figures 4 - 7 of FCC OET Bulletin No. 65. Recommendation: If the Town is satisfied that the sketches are not required for a clear understanding of the Scinetix Report it should consider waiving the requirement for point-of-interest sketches, otherwise, the Town should request that the applicant provide the sketches. The revised site plans and Engineering Report dated February 22, 2010 more completely address the outward appearance of the proposed facility and specify that the exposed cable tray is to be painted to match the exterior of the building. The revised site plans and Engineering Report dated February 22, 2010 provide details on the proposed battery cabinet and batteries. The proposed installation does not appear to create any unacceptable hazards. The revised site plans and Engineering Report dated February 22, 2010 still indicate that the facility will produce a sound level of 57.93 dBA at nearest residential property line, which exceeds the standard of 45 dB called out in §280-71A(2)ii4. The latter from William F. Collins Architects dated February 22, 2010 describes sound mitigation measures including vinyl fencing and additional plantings opposite the equipment location. No estimates of the degree of sound mitigation are provided. Recommendation: The Town should determine if the approach described is satisfactory. The revised site plans and Engineering Report dated February 22, 1010 now address provisions for a future co-locator as required by §280-72A(5). The Radio Frequency Affidavit dated February 16, 2010 now address propagation maps showing coverage at -75dBm, -85dBm and -95dBm as required by 8280- 74B(1)d, but copies of these maps were not included with the materials received for review. Also, no explanation of the applicant's objectives, standards and criteria for Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold April 16, 2010 Page 3 providing adequate signal strength, capacity and/or reliability was provided as required by §280-74B(1)e. For example, does the applicant intend to provide in- building coverage throughout the Town? If so, how was the in-building signal strength objective arrived at and why is it applicable in this case? The applicant should provide the required information so that the Town can understand how particular signal strength objectives were arrived at, and why they are appropriate for the Town of Southold. This also provides a basis for comparison of various alternatives. Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant provide the required propagation maps and explanation of coverage objectives and criteria as required by the Town Code. (No change from previous report). The application discussed the feasibility of co- locating on one of two existing sites: The Verizon facility at 31755 Main Road and the Cutchogue Fire Department at 260 New Suffolk Road. The propagation maps submitted for these sites seem to predict significantly wider coverage than the proposed site, but he applicant stated that neither site was available for leasing. Based on the response to Item 8, above, the applicant should be asked to comment on the relative merits of each site in terms ofT-Mobile's coverage objectives and plans for future sites in Southold. If the proposed site is approved, will additional future sites be required, that would otherwise not be necessary if either the firehouse or Verizon sites were available? Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant provide the above analysis. Depending on the response, the Town may want to further explore the availability of the co-location sites, especially the fire department site, before making a final decision regarding the proposed site. Please let me know if there are any questions or comments, or I have missed anything else that needs to be addressed. Very truly yours, Walter A. Cooper PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. W/LCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 13, 2010 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. cio Amato & Associates 666 Old Country Rd., Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re.' Negative Declaration: Proposed Special Exception & Site Plan for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church Located at 27245 Main Road, on the n/e corner of Main Road and Highland Road, in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Zoning District: R-40 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, April 12, 2010: WHEREAS, the request is for interior mounted antennae within an existing church steeple, including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an application for a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a public utility wireless communication facility was submitted for review on August 21, 2009, including a site plan prepared by Nell Alexander MacDonald, dated October 8, 2008; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; therefore, be it T-Mobile at Cutcho.que Presbyterian Pa.qe Two April 13, 2010 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and, as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairperson Encl. 12-12-7s State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Project Number 109-2-17.1 Date: Apd112, 2010 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Town of $outhold Planning Board as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant environmental impact and a Draft Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: T-Mobile Northeast Presbyterian Church SEQR SEQR Status: Type I [] Unlisted [] Conditioned Negative Declaration: [] Yes [] No Description of Action: Installation of a wireless communications facility inside the steeple atop an existing buildieg. The existing steeple will be replaced with a prefabricated structure to aesthetically match the current design. Supporting equipment for the antenna will be located at grade north of the building on the east side of the property in the vicinity of the parking area, which will be enclosed with six-foot white vinyl fencing and screened with evergreen vegetalion. Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county. A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended.) N/e/c/o North Main Road and Highland Road, Town of Southold, Suffolk County SEQR Negative Declaration Page 2 of 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: (See 617.7(a)-(c) for requirements of this dete~nination; see 617.7(d) for Conditioned Negative Declaration) The proposed action has been evaluated through preparation of Parts I and II of the State EAF as well as the Visual EAF Addendum and no significant impacts were identified. The subject site lies within an archeologically sensitive area and nearby a property on the National Register. However, no change to the site is proposed and the existing steeple will be replaced to aesthetically match the current design. Supporting equipment is located at ground level north of the building on the east side of the property in the vicinity of the parking area and will be surrounded by six-foot white vinyl fence. Arborvitaes are proposed adjacent to the equipment area, The supporting equipment proposed on-site will emit sound, however the combined sound 'emission for all sound producing equipment is estimated to be 57.93 decibels at the nearest property line (approximately 74' 2" north of equipment). As a result, no significant impacts associated with noise are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The proposed wireless facility will conform to all general requirements for wireless communication facilities, as identified in the Town Cede, including maximum height, minimum distance of wireless equipment to adjacent residential property lines/street, front yard setback and maximum noise from base equipment and will not require any variances. Contact Psrson: Address: If Conditioned Negative Declaration, provide on attachment the specific mitigation measures imposed, and identity comment period (not less than 30 days from date of publcation In the ENB) For Further Information: Martin H. Sidor, Planning Board Chair 54375 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971 Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 For Type I Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a Copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer, Town / City / Village of Other involved agencies (If any) Applicant (If any) Environmental Notice Bulletin, Room 538~ 50 Wolf Road~ Albany NY, 12233-1750 (Type One Acaons only) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 12, 2010 Mr. Walter A. Cooper 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 Re: Site Plan & Special Exception Application for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC Located at the Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, CutchOgue SCTM# 1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Cooper: Enclosed please find additional materials regarding the above-referenced site plan. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Encs. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, April 5, 2010 4:00 p.m. Applications Pro'ect name' i Lavender b~' the Bay SCTM#: 31-6-28.5 Location: i 7540 Mai.E~_oad,- _E_._a_.s_t_~rion ............................................................ Descr pt on i Tempora~ Greenhouse ~-~(-'~' S~t_a_t~s: ................ ]. Amended Site Plan under review Action: i Review comments and consider Final A.p_l~roval. . .A..tt~a~h_.m e n t~'._ .............. i~_S_t_a_ff_R_e.p_o_~_&~D_ra_ _ft._R_ e_ .s- o I~u t_i o n .................................................. ~ L.I:_o.c_a_~i_o_n.: ......................... The Pre_s_b_y~erian Church or Society_o_f~C_ut~_h_ogue, _2_7_2.4_5~M_a!..n_...R_oa~d ___ Description: The applicant requests co-location of a public utility wireless communication facility having interior mounted antennas within an existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing .c_h u_r..c_h_.b u i I d_i_n_9 o_ .n_.__a_~ ._9_1-_ aC_~rg_ sit_e__.!0 c._at_e_~ j~. ~_h_e... _R:~_~?_!_n_g. Dj ~. [i~.~ ........... .S~at~; ~!t~ e_?_!a~n ~p..~l_ _e_r_...r_e_vi_ _e_ .w_ ..A(~ti_.o.n; ..R...._e_vi_e_w__.S_EQ___I~_. D e term i n _a ti_o_n a n_d. ~D_r~ N _e~..a__t.!._v_~ _~ _e._c..!_a__~7...a_!!_o.__n:. ..................... · Att_ c_h e__n t.s:'_ ......... ....................................................... i Project name: SCTM#: 85-3-11.4 & 11.3 i Raphael Vineyards 2009 ,_.L_qc_a_ti_9.n_: .......................... ~..._3..9_~ 9_0__M_ai~n R__oa d, Peconic Description: ' This amended site plan is for the construction of a 6,244 sq. ft. second winery LA_gz build~ng on a previously developed and approved 50.4-acre parcel in the icultural Conservation Zonin~ District. [.~!!?i ......................... i.~_e_v_i_e_w__S__EQ_...l:~_ D_e_t_e_r_m__ination and Dra~.._N..e_g.~tj~e~.D_...e.~l_a_r_at_i0n._ ..................... · ~Att~?_m_ en_t_?.i ........ L.N~a_ti_v_e__D.e~c!_ar_a_~!o__n~a_nd~Draft Res_o_!.u_t_i?_n_ Project name'. Chase Bank ! SCTM#'~. 143-3-33.2 Location: i South side of NYS Route 25, approximately 133 feet east of Marlene ' Lane, known as 10300 Main Road, Mattituck ..................... This site plan is for the new construction of a 4,200 sq. ft. bank with two i drive-through bays on a previously developed 112,647 sq. ft. (2.8 acre) ! parcel. This parcel is split-zoned General Business (B) and Residential- ~ 40 (R-40), and proposed to be subdivided into two lots· The site plan will L b._e Jg_~J-e-d_ e-ri. b r- e-I.Y--° -n-.p-r 9J~.~_se...~ -L-°-t -! JP-- t-I~-e_.B. -Z°-n-.~. ~J9-o-9~ ~-h~-.-!~-t.: ........... Status: Site Plan under review Southold Town Board Work Session._.~.qL_~4/5/10 Project name. i ...... ~CTM# 100-143-3-33 2 i Bank i { Location: i South side of NYS Route 25, approximately 133 feet east of Marlene I Lane, known as 10300 Main Road, Mattituck Description: i This proposal is to subdivide a 2.818 acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 49,262.82 sq. ft. in the B Zoning District and Lot 2 equals 63,480.41 ft. in the R-40 Zonin District. = Prelimi ' Plat Review Action: Consider Final Pla1 )roval Attachments: Draft Resolution Location: Description: Status: SCTM#: J 1000- 86-1-11 State Route 25 2350 This conservation su on 32.83 acres of land. sq. ft., Lot 2 ft., and Lot 3 equals to be through a Sale of Develo of South~ Sketch ~roval Action: i Grant Fin; Attachments: . Draft Resol Project name: I Briarcli Location: i Description: Status: Action: Inc. - C, ' is located on the )roximately_1,500 feet !.2 Route 25 Avenue, in Peconic. 85-3-12.1, Leslie's posal is for a conse~ into three lots where Lot 1 equ~ and Lot 3 equals 21.55 acres 21.22 acres have been rmland Conditional Fire Grant Final Approval. Draft Resolution whi( 'The Co of a 24.97-acre , Lot 2 equals 1.71 acres~ s, ights to ~ of Suffolk for the I [i.?~r~:~- 'n_'_~-rne--.'--'-~.~.-~-~azz~-ferro_, Ka!SCTM# ,' 1000-63-1-~.ii_-~-2 Location: i The property i~ on the east s~de of Horton s Lane, in'S~thold. ......... ~ (1450 Horton~ Descri~[~.:- ........ ~'-~-~ .~d st ,dard subd,v,s,o~ ~s t-~-~'o su----bd,~'v~d'~'~ a 4.2~---~-~re ~ into 'here Lot 1 equals 41,994 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 43,631 ' uals 790,023 sq. ff., in the R-40 Zon!n~g_Dis_trict.. Status: Action: nt Cond,t,onal Prelimin~ary A_pproval/Ne~qative_ Attachments: Resolution, Draft Negative Declaration PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 19, 2010 Ms. Kristen McCabe c/o Nelson, Pope & Voorhis 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747 Re: Proposed Site Plan for T-Mobile, NE at Cutchogue Presbyterian Church Located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Ms. McCabe: Enclosed herewith please find material received by our office on March 16, 2010 regarding the above-referenced site plan/special exception proposal for your review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Kristy Winsbtd Senior Planner Encls. 40S LEXINGTON AVE CHRYSLER BLDG, 26TH FLR NEW YORK, NY 10174 & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR GARDEN CITY. NEW YORK 11530 TEL: (516) 227-6363 FAX: (516) 2276367 402 MAIN ST. SUITE 204 METUCHEN, NJ 08840 TEL: (732) 317-15D FAX: (732) 317-1513 I;1A FEDER/IL EXPRESS Planning t?,oard Town of Snuthold 54375 State Roule 25 Southnld, NY 11971 March 12, 2010 Attn.: Kris'fy Winser =. _..j Re: l-Mobflc Northeast I~IA. 17k/a Ommpoint CommuPtreahons, I.n,~c, S ( 1-Mpb.1!e') Application ("Application") to the Town of South~'(th6"Tok:d'~) Pla~nnir~g Board in connection with thc proposed public utility' communication facility (the "Communication 'ac~ ~t~ ) to be located at 27z45 Main Road, C utchogue, New York, l)istrict: i 000, Scction: 109. Block: 2. Lot: 17. l (thc "Property") '! ::NJ~?b_i!g_~itc P, Cf=; l,lz! 3zS-(kT:C/Pr-e~-b2~t-eria-n (2_h_urclVQ_ur File No.:. 19..3__-_4_99 Dear Ms. Winser: l.'ollo¥~ing up on your correspondence dated February 8, 2010, enclosed are nine (9) copies of folh)wing matc:'ials which address each of the items requested in your letter: Zoning Drawings. prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, I.LP, updated to depict thc safety signage (Item ! from your correspondence), batter3' specifications (Item 3). accommodation for co-locaters (Item 5') and additional landscaping along the eastern ',tows oflhe equipment area (Item 7). Vvaluation of Radio I'rcquency timissions, prepared by Scinetics Corporation. updated to include thc required sketches, and the calculations depicting anticipated co-locaters (Item 2). Acoustical Certification, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LI,P, to address the anticipated sound emissions from the equipment compound, and to set It)ah the mitigatiun measures to be employed to ensure that the anticipated sound tcvcls will not be objcctilmable (Item 4). F. nginccring Rcport, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP, updated to addrcss thc potential li)r ch-locaters within the church steep!c (Item 5), as well as discnss thc proposed batter3 in further detail (l'tem 3). Sapplcmenta! RF Affidavit with accompanying propagation maps at -75 dBm, -85dBm and -95 dBM. to confirm l'-Mobile's coverage objectives within the area AMATO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. around the Property (Item 6). Search Ring "Gap" Map. Please note that additional landscaping is not feasible to be located along the western side of the proposed equipment area. In order to meet the Town's side yard setback requirement, as well as to prevent encroachment into thc cxisting parking area, landscaping cannot be installed in this location, t lowcvcr, ,xith thc proposed PVC fencing (which was requested by the church trustees), T- Mobile believes that sufficient screening is being provided from the western vantage point. Moreover, regarding Item 6, and thc providcd maps and supplemental R J? Affidavit, please note that within paragraph 19 of the RF Affidavit, Mariana Nieto, T-Mobile's RF expert, confirms that thc primary objective for T-Mobile within this area is to supply both in-vehicle coverage along Main Road, as xvcll as in-building coverage within the surrounding structures. Provided everything is in proper order, we ask that thc Application be scheduled for the next available Planning Board agenda to discuss any remaining issues regarding this matter. If you have any qacstions, or require anything additional, please let us know. Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez Encls. CC: l'im Fincham (via email, w/out encls.) t lnward l,egcr (via email, w/out encls.) Gina Jacobcllis (via cmail, w/oul cncls.) Patti Schimkus (via cmail, w/out cncls.) SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)- 765 - 9015 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A.~ ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YOP~K 11971 Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 JAMIE.P~ICHTER~TOWN.SOUTHOLDNY.US OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Martin H. Sidor Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC / Presbyterian Church Highland Road, Cutchogue, NY SCTM #: 1000-109-02-17.1 Dear Mr. Sidor: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed~e'sit~ Pl~'~;t~'d 1:1/18/Qg~f_o.r___~. the installation of a New Cellular Wireless Communication Facility. The New Antenna wili'lYg"'~ co-located within the existing Presbyterian Church Steeple and the Equipment will be installed immediately adjacent to the parking Lot North of the Church. Please consider the following: 1. A recent site inspection has shown that adequate drainage facilities have already been installed within the parking area at this location. In addition, there is no evidence found at this site that would suggest a storm water runoff problem exists here. The proposed size and configuration of the new equipment area will not generate a significant amount of added storm water runoff. Therefore, the necessity for additional drainage is not required. 2. The Plans indicate by "Note" that the Existing Church Steeple will be reconstructed and modified to accommodate the new antenna array. It is recommended that Certified Engineered Plans be submitted to the Building Department for there comments, review and issuance of a building permit for this proposed work. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. CC: Southold Town Building Department rely, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI February 25, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC Att: Kristen McCabe 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Re: SEQRA Review for T-mobile Northeast Presbyterian Chumh Located: 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Ms; McCabe: As per our telephone conversation have enclosed copies of the following items to assist with your review of the above-mentioned application: 2. 3. 4. 5. Engineering report prepared January 11, 2010. Visual Resource Evaluation dated June 9, 2009, revised January 7, 2010. Radio Frequency Affidavit received January 2010. Appraisal Consulting Report dated January 11, 2010. Letter from Nicholas DeFelice, P.E. dated January 6, 2010. Please contact me anytime with any questions you may have. Very .truLy yours, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Cc: Eric: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director EAF Site plan application PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI February 11, 2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Walter A. Cooper 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 Dear Mr. Cooper: Re: Consultant invoices: Site Plan & Special Exception application -T-Mobile Northeast LLC located at the Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-2-17.1 Enclosed is a supply of voucher forms for your use when submitting future invoices to this department. Please reference Purchase Order Number 20997 which relates to the above wireless facility review, and sign the Payee Certification. Also note the correct Suffolk County Tax Map Number (SCTM#) for the property is 109-2-17.1 Your Invoice #2 is currently being processed. If you need additional information, please contact US. Secretarial Assistant Encs. cc: Kdsty Winser Town of Southold, New York - Pa, Vendor Tax ID Number or Social Security Number Vendor No. ,ment Voucher 3576 V~ndor Address 117 Walnut Hills Drive Vendor Name Walter A. Cooper Williamsburg, VA 23185 Vendor Tel~phone Number Vendor Contact Invoice Invoice Invoice Net Purchase.Order Number Date Total Discount Amount Claimed Number Desedpton of Goods or Services 2 1/31/10 $300.00 $300.00 20997 consulting: 109-2-17.1 B 8020 4 500 ~00 Payee Certification The undersigned (Claiman0 (Acting on behalf of the above named claimant) does hereby cern/fy that the foregoing claim is/~ae and correct, that no pza~t has been paid, except as therain stated, that the balance therein stated is actually due and owing, and that taxes fxom which the Town is exempt are excluded. Signature Title Company Name Date Department Certification I hereby certify that the materials above specified h~ve been rece/ved by me in good condition without substitution, the serv/ces ploperly performed and that the quantities thereof have bee~ verified with the exceptions or discrep~naie~ noted, and payment is approved. Signature WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, February 8, 2010 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda 4:45 p.m. Site Plans Description: This application is for a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a new i = wireless communication facility where the antennas are to be mounted within an existing church steeple, and the base station equipment is to be[ located outside the building in a screened enclosure. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of ani existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91- [.~[~ ~!~ !.~_!~ .~..h.~..~(~.~.i[~.g..~!~t.[i.~'~: Statu~; Action: ~ Review recommendations from technical consultant and draft le~er to ~ ~PP!i~ AEachment~; ~ Letter from Walter Cooper &.Draft Le~te[ Discussion: 1. 2. 3. 4. Comprehensive Plan Update - report on public meeting results Hamlet Implementation Panel 2009 Year-End Report LWRP Year-End Report Review of cluster requirement in subdivision code PLANNING BOARD MEMOS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI February8,2010 PI.4kNNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Amato & Associates, P.C. Att: Gregory R. Alvarez 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 ge~ Site plan & Special Exception Consideration T-mobile Northeast, LLC at Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Alvarez; I'm writing in response to your revised site plans dated January 6, 2010 and additional information submitted in connection to the Public hearing held on january 11, 2010. Your submission has been reviewed and corroborated with an independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town to assist in the review process. The following information is for your information and to be submitted for review and consideration by the Planning Board: The revised application still does not appear to have any provisions or specifications for safety signage as required by §280-70M(1)b. It is also not clear how church staff will be prevented from coming into contact with the radio antennas inside the building. Is any form of physical access control proposed? Safety signage and adequate access control are particularly important in this case. The general public and church staff (who are presumed not to be knowledgeable of radio frequency safety procedures) may have close physical access to the antennas and radio frequency equipment. Therefore, provide signage specifications and access control plans for the proposal. The "Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions" report prepared by Scinetix Corporation dated October 2, 2008 ("Scinetix Report") has apparently not been updated to comply with requirements of §280-70J. No sketches were provided to illustrate the relative locations of the various points of interest as required by §280- 70J(3). For your convenience, examples of the required sketches can be found in Figures 4 - 7 of FCC OET Bulletin No. 65. The Scinetix Report also refers to potential "...future co-locating carriers..." at the site but it does not provide an estimate of the power density contribution of such carriers as required by §280-70.[(3). Based on the physical space ~4pplication for T-mobile Northeast, Cutchogue p.2 available in the steeple after the completion of the T-Mobile installation, it should be possible to determine how many additional carders can be accommodated and to make a worst-case estimate of the maximum cumulative power density that can be expected. Please submit a revised radio frequency emissions report addressing the above requirements. The revised site plans indicate that there will be a battery rack in the outdoor equipment area, but the types of batteries are not identified. Are these wet cell batteries? Will they produce fumes or the risk of chemical spills? Will containment measures and/or special ventilation be required? Please provide a more complete description of the battery plant and provide assurances acceptable to the Town that the installation will not create any unacceptable hazards. The Engineering Report dated January 11, 2010 indicates that the facility will produce a sound level of 57.93 dBA at nearest residential property line, which exceeds the standard of 45 dB called out in §280-71A(2)ii4. Submit proposed mitigation measures to reduce the sound level and/or explain to that satisfaction of the Town that the sound levels produced will not be objectionable for consideration. The revised site plans and Engineering Report do not seem to address any physical provisions for future co-locators as required by §280-72A(5). Please specify any provisions proposed for future co-locators, including the number of co-locators that can be accommodated and the nature and extent of any modifications to the building that would be required in the future. The Radio Frequency Affidavit dated January 8, 2010 includes propagation maps showing existing and proposed coverage patterns from existing sites, the proposed site and two potential existing co-location sites. However, these maps did not include coverage at -75dBm, -85dBm and -95dBm (plus any other signal strength levels deemed appropriate by the applicant), as required by §280-74B(1)d. Although the propagation maps that were provided refer to signal strength levels for "in-building," in-vehicle," and "on-street" coverage, no explanation of the applicant's objectives, shandards and criteria for providing adequate signal strength, capacity and/or reliability was provided as required by §280-74B(1)e. For example, is there intent to provide in-building coverage throughout the Town? If so, how was the in-building signal strength objective arrived at and why is it applicable in this case? The applicant should provide the required information so that the Town can understand how particular signal strength objectives were arrived at, and why they are appropriate for the Town of Southold. This also provides a basis for comparison of various alternatives. Provide the required propagation maps and explanation of their coverage objectives and criteria as required by the Town Code. Last, the proposed landscaping around the structure does not appear to meet the provisions for adequate screening around the equipment area intended to screen form view from all views. Please revise and resubmit for review. Application for T-mobile Northeast, Cutchogue p.3 I trust that this provides the information sought to process this application further. Should you have any question or need clarification on the above matter, please contact me anytime to discuss the matter. Upon completion of the revised site plan and its review, the matter will be scheduled for the Board's determination. Sincerely, Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Walter A. Cooper Radio Frequency Planning & Consultation 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 757-220-9442 January 30, 2010 Revised February 3, 2010 Ms. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Via e-mail RE: Town of Southold - T-Mobile Northeast LLC (FKA Omnipoint) at the Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-~ Dear Ms. Winser: I have reviewed the revised site plans dated January 6, 2010 and the additional materials submitted for the proposed wireless facility. The following new and/or revised comments and recommendations are provided for your consideration. General Comment: The application proposes a facility with minimal visual impact but still does not appear to meet all requirements of the Town Code. Additional reasonably available information is required in order for the Town to reach a fully informed decision. Specific Comments: The revised site plans indicate that the proposed facility would be less than 500 feet from adjacent residential property lines in violation of §280-70.I.(6). Since the facility, except for the outdoor pad-mounted equipment and external cable tray, would be virtually invisible from the adjacent residences, it may not be visually objectionable. Assuming the Town is satisfied regarding the other environmental impacts (such as noise and electromagnetic radiation, as further discussed below), the Town may want to consider waiving the requirement. The revised application still does not appear to have any provisions or specifications for safety signage as required by §280-70M(1)b. It is also not clear how church staff will be prevented from coming into contact with the radio antennas inside the building. Is any form of physical access control proposed? Safety signage and adequate access control are particularly important in this case. The general public Ms. KfistyWinser Town of Southold January30,2010 Rev~edFebruary3, 2010 Page 2 and church staff (who are presumed not to be knowledgeable of radio frequency safety procedures), may have close physical access to the antennas and radio frequency equipment. Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant provide the required signage specifications and access control plans. The "Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions" report prepared by Scinetix Corporation dated October 2, 2008 ("Scinetix Report") has apparently not been updated to comply with requirements of §280-70J. No sketches were provided to illustrate the relative locations of the various points of interest as required by §280- 70J(3). Examples of the required sketches can be found in Figures 4 - 7 of FCC OET Bulletin No. 65. The Scinetix Report also refers to potential "...future co-locating carriers..." at the site but it does not provide an estimate of the power density contribution of such carriers as required by §280-70.1.(3). Based on the physical space available in the steeple after the completion of the T-Mobile installation, it should be possible to determine how many additional carders can be accommodated and to make a worst-case estimate of the maximum cumulative power density that can be expected. Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant provide a revised radio frequency emissions report addressing the above requirements. Neither the revised site plans nor the Visual Resource Evaluation dated June 9, 2009 show that the outward appearance of the existing building will remain identical or nearly identical to its appearance prior to the construction of the facility as required by §280-71A(2)(b)i. Cable tray is to be mounted to the exterior of the building and the existing steeple material is to be replaced with radio transparent material. It is not clear that these changes are shown. Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant provide additional material specifications, site plans and/or visual renderings of the completed facility before considering whether these changes are acceptable given the nature and location of the proposed facility and any likely visual impacts on nearby properties. The revised site plans indicate that there will be a battery rock in the outdoor equipment area, but the types of batteries are not identified. Are these wet cell batteries? Will they produce fumes or the risk of chemical spills? Will containment measures and/or special ventilation be required? Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold January 30, 2010 Revised February 3, 2010 Page 3 Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant provide a more complete description of the battery plant and provide assurances acceptable to the Town that the installation will not create any unacceptable hazards. The Engineering Report dated January 11, 2010 indicates that the facility will produce a sound level of 57.93 dBA at nearest residential property line, which exceeds the standard of 45 dB called out in §280-71A(2)ii4. Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant propose mitigation measures to reduce the sound level and/or explain to that satisfaction of the Town that the sound levels produced will not be objectionable. The revised site plans and Engineering Report do not seem to address any physical provisions for future co-locators as required by §280-72A(5). Recommendations: The Town should request that the applicant specify any provisions proposed for future co-locators, including the number of co-locators that can be accommodated and the nature and extent of any modifications to the building that would be required in the future. The Radio Frequency Affidavit dated January 8, 2010 includes propagation maps showing existing and proposed coverage patterns from existing sites, the proposed site and two potential existing co-location sites. However, these maps did not include coverage at -75dBm, -85dBm and -95dBm (plus any other signal strength levels deemed appropriate by the applicant), as required by §280-74B(1)d. Although the propagation maps that were provided refer to signal strength levels for "in-building," "in-vehicle," and "on-street" coverage, no explanation of the applicant's objectives, standards and criteria for providing adequate signal strength, capacity and/or reliability was provided as required by §280-74B(1)e. For example, does the applicant intend to provide in-building coverage throughout the Town? If so, how was the in-building signal strength objective arrived at and why is it applicable in this case? The applicant should provide the required information so that the Town can understand how particular signal strength objectives were arrived at, and why they are appropriate for the Town of Southold. This also provides a basis for comparison of various alternatives. Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant provide the required propagation maps and explanation of their coverage objectives and criteria as required by the Town Code. Ms. ICristy Winser Town of Southold January 30, 2010 Revised February 3, 2010 Page 4 The application discussed the feasibility of co-locating on one of two existing sites: The Verizon facility at 31755 Main Road and the Cutchogue Fire Department at 260 New Suffolk Road. The propagation maps submitted for these sites seem to predict significantly wider coverage than the proposed site, but he applicant stated that neither site was available for leasing. Based on the response to Item 8, above, the applicant should be asked to comment on the relative merits of each site in terms of T-Mobile's coverage objectives and plans for future sites in Southold. If the proposed site is approved, will additional future sites be required, that would otherwise not be necessary if either the firehouse or Verizon sites were available? Recommendation: The Town should request that the applicant provide the above analysis. Depending on the response, the Town may want to further explore the availability of the co-location sites, especially the fire department site, before making a final decision regarding the proposed site. Please let me know if there are any questions or comments, or I have missed anything else that needs to be addressed. Very truly yours, Walter A. Cooper Sanford Hanauer, Chairperson ~ Reynolds duPont, Jr. Herbert Ernest Joseph Lee Ronald McGreevy Howard Meinke Nicholas Planamento Mark Schwartz ~ .L' ", L= . ~ = 1~ Town of S.outhold Ill Architectural .R. ev,ew Committee 4:00p.m., January.21, 2010 Town Hall Annex Executive Board Room Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Fax (631) 765-6641 Telephone: (631 ) 765 - 1892 southoldtown.northfork, net Members Present: Sandford Hanauer, Chairman; Joseph Lee; Ronald McGreevy; Nicholas Planamento; Mark Schwartz; Elizabeth Thompson; Kristy Winser, Planner; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary. The minutes for the October 22, 2009 meeting were approved. Introduction: All applicants will give a presentation consisting of drawings, exterior materials samples and other information required by the Planning Dep0a-tment to the Committee. The Committee will ask questions and make suggestions as part of a general discussion with each applicant. Final recommendations from the ARC will be presented to the Planning Board in the ARC Meeting Minutes, and be made part of the Planning file for that application. The Planning Board will consider these recommendations, together with all comments from other agencies, and provide the applicant with a comprehensive writ-ten list of its requested revisions. New Application: · T-MOBILE NORTHEAST SCTM #1000-102-1-17.1 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. of Amato & Associates, P.C., and Paul K. Gartelmann, AIA, LEED AP of William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP presented the project to the committee. The Committee approves the proposed project design to install a wireless communication facility within a church steeple as shown today. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. · SOUTHOLD IGA SCTM#: 1000-61-4-25.1 A site visit was made by some members of.the Architectural Review Committee ~n regards to the renovation of the Southold tGA. The'Committee was pleased to see that their recommendations including the installation of six (6) additional windows (five on the north side and one on the west side) were used by the owner. By adding the ' windows, it made the facade more street and pedestrian friendly. The Committee would like to thank the Building Department and Michael Verity for referring the owner to the Architectural Review CormTuttee, and to the owner for using the suggested recommendations from our committee. The committee is looking forward to this hopefully setting precedence for future projects that involve exterior renovations that otherwise do not require site plan review. A motion was made to close the meeting at 4:50p.m. All in favor. ~'Elizabet~ C~n~rell, Sec'~etary Cc: Michael Verity, Bldg. Dept. Supervisor Scott Russell Town Board Members PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Char WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND January27,2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAII~IG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: T-Mobile Northeast at Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Planning Department is conducting a review of your Building Permit Application for its report to the Building Department as required by Town Code. We will need to hire a technical consultant to review the application. At this time, we request payment of $1,250.00 to the Town of Southold to cover the cost of the technical consultant's review. Thank you. Sincerely, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Winser, Krist), From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Winser, Kristy Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:59 PM 'Gregory Alvarez' Lanza, Heather Digital Propagation Maps Greg, As discussed with you at the ARC meeting, the following item will need to be submitted in addition to those required in 144-8 (c) in connection to the Building Permit application requirements. Sec 280-74B 1 (f) Digital Files of the propagation and gap maps, including attribute information, in GIS format and projecting that is compatible with the GIS technology currently in use by the town of Southold. As mentioned to you, I will forward the contact information for the technical person at the Town regarding any digital software/formatting issues if needed? Have a good night. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy. WinserC, town,southold.ny.us PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI January22,2009 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone~ 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Walter A. Cooper 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 Re: Site plan & Special Exception application for T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Located: At the Presbyterian Chumh, Cutchogue 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Cooper, Please find enclosed an amended site plan last revised January 06, 2010 and the following related materials submitted on behalf of the applicant during the Public Hearing held January 11, 2010 for the above referenced site plan. As per the applicant's representative, the relocation of the equipment area was at the request of the property owner as their preferred location. 1. Resumes for experts on behalf of T-mobile Northeast 2. Revised Engineering report dated 1/11/10 3. Revised Structural letter dated 1/11/10 4. Revised Visual Resource Evaluation dated 1/11/10 5. Radio frequency Affidavit dated 1/8/10 6. Appraisal Report dated 1/11/10 AlsO, I wanted to inform you that Nelson, Pope and Voorhis have been hired by the Town and notified to conduct the SEQRA review for this application. I hope the enclosed information provides you with enough information to continue with your review of this application. Please contact me anytime should you require additional information. Best regards, Kristy Winser( Senior Plannc~ Encls. cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND DONALD J. WILCENSKI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 F~x: 631 765-3136 January 12,2010 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Close Hearing: Proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Zoning District: R-40 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, January 11, 2010, adopted the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby closes the public hearing for the proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman Page 1 of I Winser, Kristy From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:19 PM To: 'Kristy' Subject: FW: Proposal for T-Mobil Kristy - it seems that NPV doesn't know they should proceed with this SEQRA review. I answered Kristen that we have it and we approved them moving forward with the review. H From: Kristen Mcr. abe [mailto:kmccabe@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:07 PM To: Lanza, Heather Subject: Proposal for T-Mobil Hi Heather. I wanted to touch base with you to make sure you relieved the proposal for the T-mobile wireless facility that Ashley sent to you a couple weeks ago. If you didn't receive it let me know and I'll forward to you. Hope all is well. Kristen L. McCabe Environmental Planner NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMEN[AL - PLANNING - CONSULIING 572 Walt: Whitman Road Melvill% NY 1~747 ph: ([331) 427-5665 ext. fax: (63 ~) 427 562o kmccabe(Zi) nelsonpope.com ~-~ Please consider the environment before you print this e-mail or any attachments 2/12/2010 PLA-NN~EqG BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H, SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L EDWARDS DONALD 3. WILCENSKI JOSEPH L. TOVf'dSEND January 12,2010 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Lead Agency Designation: Proposed Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Zoning District: R-40 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, January 11, 2010, adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, this application is for a Special Exception & Site Plan Approval for a new wireless communication facility where the antennas are to be mounted within an existing church steeple, and the base station equipment is to be located outside the building in a screened enclosure. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. The property is located at 27245 Main Road, on the n/e comer of Main Road and Highland Road, in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1; and WHEREAS, on October 7, 2009, the Southold Town Planning Board conducted a SEQRA coordinated review for this Unlisted Action; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, establishes itself as Lead Agency for the Unlisted Action. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman VlATO & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNI3RY ROAD January ll,2010 VIA HAND DELIVER Y Chairman Martin H. Sidor and Board Members Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, lnc.'s ("T-Mobile") Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board ("Board") in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility (the "Communication Facility") to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17.1 (the "Property") T-Mobile Site Ref.: LI- 13 -807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103-400 Dear Mr. Chairman and Board Members: As part of the record, the following items were previously submitted to the Town in support of T- Mobile's Application on August 20, 2009: I. Four (4) copies of Health Report, prepared by Scinetics Corporation, dated October 21,2008; 2. Seven (7) copies of structural letter, prepared by Nicholas J. DeFelice, P.E., dated December 1,2008; 3. Seven (7) copies ofT-Mobile's FCC License; 4. One (1) copy of the TOWAIR Determination; 5. One (1) copy of the Visual Impact Analysis with photo-simulations, prepared by DMS Consulting, dated June 9, 2009; and 6. One (1) copy of a Due Diligence Affidavit, prepared by Jacob M. George, dated August 19, 2009. In addition, following up on the Board's work session on October 5, 2009, the following materials were submitted to the Board on November 4, 2009, to further support T-Mobile's Application: Nine (9) copies of revised Zoning Drawings, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP, and updated to include on Sheet SP-I all adjacent land uses, structures and zoning within 500 feet of the Properly; Seven (7) additional copies of the FCC compliance report prepared by Scinetics Corporation; and Seven (7) additional copies of the propagation maps prepared by T-Mobile's Radio Frequency Engineer. Furthermore, enclosed are the following items in support ofT-Mobile's Application to the Board for the proposed Communication Facility to be located at the Property: 4. 5. 6. 17. 18. One (1) copy ofT-Mobile's FCC License; One ( I ) copy of resumes lbr the following experts who are available to testify on behalf ofT- Mobile: (a) Paul Gartelmann, of William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP; (b) Mariana Nieto, ofT-Mobile; (c) Donna-Marie Stipo of DMS Consulting Services, Inc.; (d) Louis Comacchia of Scinetics Corporation; and (e) Michael J. Lynch of Lynch Appraisal Ltd.; Nine (9) copies of the revised Engineering Report, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP, revised on January 1 l, 2010; Nine (9) copies of the revised Structural Letter, prepared by Nicholas J. DeFelice, P.E., on behalf of William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP, revised on January 11, 2010; Nine (9) copies of the revised Visual Resource Evaluation prepared by DMS Consulting Services, Inc., dated January 11, 2010; Nine (9) copies of the Radio Frequency Affidavit, with attached Propagation Maps, prepared by Mariana N ieto, T-Mobile's Radio Frequency Engineer, dated January 8, 2010; One (I) copy of the Appraisal Report prepared by Lynch Appraisal, Ltd., dated January 11, 2010; and One (1) copy of the FCC Compliance Report; prepared by Scinetics Corporation. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez Encls. Tim Fincham (via email, w/out encls.) Howard Leger (via email, w/out encls.) Gina Jacobellis (via email, w/out encls.) 7 2 20~0,] VIEW OF CHURCH LOOKING NORTH FROM MAIN RD. / Nicholas J. DeFeliee, P.E. Consulting Engineer 22 Hills Park Lane, Smithtown, NY 11787 Telephone: (631) 361-7543 Fax: (631) 686-6320 January 6. 2010 William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP 12-1 Technology Drive Setauket, NY 11733 Attn: Mr. Neil MacDonald, AIA Re; Omnipoint - L1-13-807-C THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr MacDonald, Pursuant to your request, 1 have reviewed the proposed antenna installation within the existing church steeple, The proposed antenna locations are shown on the zoning documents prepared by William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP dated January 6, 2010. Based upon my review, is my professional opinion that the installation of the proposed antennas will not adversely impact the structural integrity of the existing steeple. tf you have any questions please call. Sincerely, Nicholas J DeFelice, ~) COUNTY 0~: SUFFOLK Real Prope~y ~ax ~rvice Agencyl~m WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, January 11, 2010 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda 4:15 p.m. Site Plans Site Plans · .... ; ; SCTM#' 1000-100-4-3 1 pr0Je.c.t, n~.n~- i.S.h'n~.V!neya.r.ds ~ : 1 ............................................... Location s/s/o Oregon ~..o.a~ H ! ~_n...~.L!~..~-t-t-i-~.-k : .......... 5~i'i~i ~: P~:~i~ '~Sii'~"pl~i for the as-built construction of four (4) buildings - ' ! including a 1,646 sq. ft. wine making and wine tasting building with 336.3 i sq. ft. of deck, a 2,730 sq. ft. wine storage barn, an 884.1 sq. ft. I accessory storage building and a 206.1 sq. ft. frame shed on a 979,664 i sq. ft. (22.49 acres) parcel whereas, the development area is 53,078 sq. ft 1 21 acres 'n the Agr'cu tufa Conservation D~stnct. Status: i Site Plan Review Act on' Rev ew app cant s submission .......... Attachments: i Staff Report Town Eng neer's Report Map [ [:o~{ ~;~: ............... ~:F~"'is~'~-I~"""~'~"'~i~"r'~i~'~'~:'So'~i~'i~ of Cutchogue, 27245 Main Roa~ ............. ~i~{~'~ ]~ ~'~J~ation is for a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a new ' wireless communication facility where the antennas are to be mounted within an~ existing church steeple, and the base station equipment is to be located outside ~ the building in a screen~ enclosure· As pa~ of the application, the applicant ' proposes to remove and repla~ a podion of an existing church steeple to ' match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R~0 Zon ng District .................. Status: New Site Plan Subdivisions Conservation Subdivision _ ] ..................................... Locat on' n/o North Bayv ew Road 180 feet w/o Jacobs Lane m Southold !~e~cript.i0.n; 7:!9~ ~9n~.~at!~_~bd [v.!~.!0n· ................................. Status: i Fna A. pP??(a.! , A~!gn~ D i~.fi re:~e!.~ m a in~en~ ~e.!s~ues: ~ A~achments: [ WORK SESSION AGENDA THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOA~I~ Monday, January 4, 2010 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications i corner of Main Road and Highland Road ........ wireless communication facility where the antennas are to be mounted within an existing church steeple, and the base station equipment is to be located outside the building in a screened enclosure. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of ani existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.9l- air_e s!~e !ocated !n th~.R~4O.z~on.ing.D!~t[ic~: Status: New S te P an Action: Lead Agency Coord nat on ~ Attachments: Draft Reso ut on for L~ad.Ag~ncy .......................... Location: Located at the intersection on the s/s/o County Road 48 and the e/s/o Horton Lane known as 43960 County Road 48 in Southold. Description: This site plan is for two new one-story buildings of 7,000 sq. ft. each with 10 separate offices for a total of 14,000 sq. ft. on a 2.437 acre parcel in the LB Zonin District ! Status: i Approved S~te Plan Action: i Consider an extension of al~proval. Attachments i Draft Resolution for an Extension ii Location: 10300 NYS Route 25, 133' +/- east of Marlene Lane & NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: This proposal is to subdivide a 2.818 acre parcel into two lots where Lot , 1 equals 49,262.82 sq. ft. in the B Zoning District and Lot 2 equals i 63 480.41 sq. ft. in the R-40 Zoning District. Status ......... pre!im.h]~ p. lat ........................... i Ac~gr~ J R~.iew Eesolution..fg~ pEelimiqary plat aP.P.~°.~a!: ............. Attachmer~ D~afl R~so..u[?r~ fo[' ~[(~!!m!nary P!a~..A. ppr~a.! ................ Project name: i Forestbrook at Bayview SCTM#: 1000-79-2-7 [ Conservation Subdivision Descr Pt °n ~h.s..~7 ~5 ac['e.pmpe.rty.!~a~.!~e~.n..s..u, bdi~!d.e-.d_!.-n, t9 7 k~ts, S.tatus; i Fina!.A.pP[.o~aI .................................. Action: i Reduce bond to reflect fire well cost only. Discussion: 1. Planning review. Accessory Apartment Local Law. WORK SESSION AGENDA THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOAR~ Monday, December 21, 2009 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Applications ........................................ , .... ;' ............................. ~-; ........................... 1' . ................... ~'~ ........................... Prgject name: Twin Forks LandscapInlt I_SCT_M_~.~.[~_1...0_O_0-837__3.7_8 .................................... -L-0~'ii~'~'.7- .................... W~'~"~[d~-mi ~'~-~'~-~i~(~i~a~,-~00 feet south of Oregon Road, Cutchogqe ¥i i - iie construct on of a 6,000 sq. ff. addition to an existing 1,263 sq. ft. building having a total of 7,263 sq. ft. of building to be used as a ........................................ c_o__n&r_a_~Rr_'~Y_a[d_.o.rLa_l_~ac_[~e_..p.._ar_~[J_n.._t_h_e L~ig_h_t_lnd__u_s_t_rj.a_l_Z__o~n_i_n. lt_D~i_st_?j_c~t_. ........ _S_tat__u_s:· ............................... ~...e!.._S_i_t_e_._~[ .a_n ........................................................................................................... · .-A.-c..-t.!°--n-:- .......................... R-e-vie--w- --d r--a--fi' ~°-m-m~n--t-s- -t-°-t"he--Z-B-A; _A..ff_.a_ ~l~.m.e..~J .s:· .................. D._ca_ff_~Me_m__0. J Pro_j~ct n_a_m..e_: ............ -~-a~-hael Vineyards I SCTM#: I 1000-85-3-11.3 & 11.4 Location: South side of Main Road, approximately 520 feet west of Indian Neck Lane, Peconic -I~e--scr--~i~n-~ .............. This amended site plan is for the construction of a 3,112 sq. fl. second winery building on a previously developed and approved 50.4-acre parcel in the ......................... _A_gricultural Conservation Zoning District. Status: Amended Site Plan Action: Consider accepting the application for review and refer the application to involved interested ag_encies for comment. Att a C~_n_t_s_: ........................... ._S.t_affR_.e_ Port ............. _L_o__c~..!i_on_: .............................. _T_h~e_.P_resb~erian Church or Society of Cutchogue, 27245 Main Road Description: Wireless communication facility with interior mounted antennas in an existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area outside the building and screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steep e to match the existing ......................................................... _c_h_u_rc__h.b__u_il_di~ng_.o_n_~_.0_..~9.~l-_a_gr_e site Io__ca_t_ed i__o_n t_h_e_~l~._0_..Z_o__ni__n~?_i~.t_r!_c._t: ................... __S_te_t_u_s~ ................ New Site Plan ............. Attachments: Letter from Waiter CooJ3~_r .............. Loca_t!o_n:~ .................... North side of S.R. 25, Cutchog_ue- _Des_c_riRt_ip~ n: ......... Christmas Tree Farm __S. ja_tys_: ............. _N/~_s..n_o_._a.l~.@lication before Planning_ Board at this time. _ _A_c_t! R n. :_ ............... _R~x!e__w_.~.B._A_..c.o...m_ .m..eo_ t_s__r__e_: _ _si_te__l~La n__ re~[~ e~[g u~Ji~.~: .......................... Location: Southwest corner of Wells Road and State Route 25 in Peconic ' Description: 80~60 Conservation Subdivision on 32.83 acres of land. Lot 1 equals 65,562 sq. fl, Lot 2 equals 77,694 sq. ft., and Lot 3 equals 29.5416 acres and is proposed to be preserved through a Sale of Development Rights to the Town of Southold Status: ~ Sketch A.p_p_roval ............ .............. NELSON, POPE (~, VOOI=iHIE), LLC Heather Lanza, Planning Dir~ci6f ~ . Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Jan~uary 5, 2010 Dear Heather: Thank you for contacting NP&V f6r ~r~ices' ff eon'neat on W~th the SEQRA referenced project. Town of Southold, SEQRA Review T-r~obile Northeast Presbyterian Church Prlposal for Services /0~.,~/~,,/ review of the above The following services and fees are proposed: 1. Inspect aerial photography and in-house environmental resources to evaluate land use patterns, zoning and environmental characteristics. 2. Review documentation provided by Planning Board. 3. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form provided by applicant. 4. Prepare Part II Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Prepared recommended determination of significance and provide declaration for the Planning Board's use. Fee: $1,250.00 A cursory review of the application was completed, including review of the Town's historic district and historic structures, review of SEQRA Part 617.4 (Type I Actions) and review of Article XVIl of the Town Code. The subject site does not appear to be located within an historic district, nor does it appear to be located substantially contiguous to an historic district or historic structure. The "Old House", which is listed on the National Register, is located east of the subject site. In addition, the proposed wireless antenna will be located within an existing structure and will not be visible from poblic and residential vantage points. As a result, the proposed wireless facility will be classified as an Unlisted Action under SEQRA. Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call should you have any questions or to anthorize review. We will commence immediately upon approval and would expect to complete the review within two wee'ks. Respectfully submitted, & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW 6~ OLD COUN'n~ ROAD 9T~ FLOOR GARDEN C3TY, NEW ~ORK 11530 January 7, 2010 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Kristy Winser Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc.'s ("T-Mobile") Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Plamfing Board in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility (the "Communication Facility") to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17.1 (the "Property") T-Mobile Site Ref.: LI-13-807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103-400 Dear Ms. Winser: Pursuant to your request, enclosed are nine (9) copies of revised Zoning Drawings, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP, updated to depict the reconfigured equipment area relocated further to the north on the Property. Please note that the proposed antennas within the steeple have not been changed in any way. We look forward to presenting the Application at the Plamfing Board's public hearing on Monday. If you have any questions, or require anything additional, please let us know. Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez Encls. CC: Tim Finchani (via email, w/out encls.) Howard Leger (via email, w/out encls.) Gina Jacobellis (via email, w/out encls.) vI.ATO & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW fi66 Ol~ CO~ ROAD January 6, 2010 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc.'s ("T-Mobile") Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility (the "Communication Facility") to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17.1 (the "Property") T-Mobile Site Ref.: LI- 13 -807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103 -400 Dear Sir/Madam: In connection with the above-referenced Application to the Town Planning Board, enclosed are the following: 1. One (1) copy of the Notice of Hearing that was mailed to the requisite property owners; 2. One (1) list of property owners; 3. One (1) original Posting Affidavit, executed by Howard Leger, who posted the poster notice; One (1)original Posting Affidavit, exec~l~,~.by [~u..ryn~.,.~ A. Rivera, ~hO ':-<"~'~i [ prepared the notice mailing; i ''''~ '' i Original certified mail return receipts; ~ ~ 6. Returned Green Cards; and 7. Returned Envelopes. AIVIATO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. If you require anything additional, please do not hesitate to call. continuing attention to this matter. Thank you for your Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez ~ Encls. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a special exception and a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-40 Zoning District; That the application is for a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a new wireless communication facility where the antennas are to be mounted within an existing church steeple, and the base station equipment is to be located outside the building in a screened enclosure. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site. The property is located at 27245 Main Road, on the n/e corner of Main Road and Highland Road, in Cutchogue; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2nd FI., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. The office will be closed t2/24 at 11:30 a.m., t2/25, 12/31 at 1t:30 a.m., 1/1/t0 for the holidays. Information can also be obtained via the internet by sending an e-mail message to: Carol. Kalin@town.southold.ny. us; That a public hearing will be held on these matters by the Planning Board on Monday~ January 11~ 2010 at 6:00 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church Date: 12/15/09 By-Pass Credit Trust 38 Hunt Farm Road Waccabuc, NY 10597 Joseph R. Bums P.O. Box 155 Cutchogue, NY 11935 McGowan Andrew J. III Trt P.O. Box 1359 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Jeanne M. Minerva 26760 Route 25 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Manfred Lee 26850 Route 25 P.O. Box 1282 Cutchogue, NY 11935-0886 Janet Moore 640 Cases Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Stanley Salter Cases Lane P.O. Box 473 Cutchogue, NY 1 I935 Cutch-New Surf Hst Councl P.O. Box 714 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Cutch New Surf Free Lib P.O. Box 935 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Old House Society Inc. Bressler, P.C. 13015 Route 25 P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Marjorie B. Swiatocha 395 Cases Lane P.O. Box 227 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Property Owners List Irene M. Schmidt 750 New Suffolk Road P.O. Box 1057 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dorville Finkle New Suffolk Avenue P.O. Box 563 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Corchaug Seafood Inc. P.O. Box 971 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Lou J. Dickerson P.O. Box 542 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Start LLC 38 Williams Street Copiague, NY 11726 Patricia Mistretta 300 Albany Street Apartment 6H New York, NY 10280 Victor E. Salerno III 151 E 80th Street Apartment 9D New York, NY 10075 JaniceHansen 248 Glen Avenue Sea Cliff, NYl1579 Frederick W. Kaelin Jr. P.O. Box 1 Cutchogue, NY 11935-0001 Antone F. Surozenski 525 Highland Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Joseph Hannabury 570 Highland Road P.O. Box 800 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Property Owners List Alan A. Cardinale P.O. Box 77 Mattituck, NY 11952 Cutchogue Presbyterian Church 27745 Route 25 P.O. Box 964 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RC Church of Sacred Heart Diocese of Rockville Centre 50 N. Park Avenue P.O. Box 9023 Rockville Centre, NY 11571-9023 RC Church of Sacred Heart Diocese of Rockville Centre P.O. Box 9023 Rockville Centre, NY 11571-9023 27850 Main Road LLC 5780 New Suffolk Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Williamson Joyce Lix Trt 410 New Suffolk Avenue P.O. Box 111 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Cutchogue Fire District 260 New Suffolk Road Cutchogue, NY 11935-2037 27980 Main Road LLC 5780 New Suffolk Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 28000 Main Road LLC P.O. Box 106 Mattituck, NY 11952 Dawn Blangiardo 355 Deephole Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RC Church of Sacred Heart Diocese of Rockville Centre 50 N. Park Avenue P.O. Box 9023 Rockville Centre, NY 11571-9023 Property Owners List Patricia J. Lawrence P.O. Box 770 27585 Route 25 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Catherine J. Cartobuo 161 Waterside Avenue Northport, NY 11768 Jerry Chrisafis 52-28 Redfield Street Douglaston, NY 11362 Cutchogue Presbyterian Church 27415 Route 25 P.O. Box 964 Cutchogue, NY 11935 New York State Agency Building One Empire Plaza Albany, NY 12238 Property Owners List AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I pemonally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has rem.ained~n_ place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the ownem of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Address Date /~ ~..-~ Laura Curanaj Notary Public, State of New York No. 02CU6186966 Qualified in Westchester County Commission Expires May 121 2012 PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVlT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri, 1/08/10 Re: Proposed Special Exception and Site Plan for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutcho.que Presbyterian Church SCTM#s: 1000-109-2-17.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, January 11, 2010, 6:00 p.m. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on ~.b~r 30, 2OO~ ~l~nature / / c/o 666 OZd Country Road, Sutte 901, Garden City, Ne~ York 11530 Address Date ~.~//~ Notary Public ~ ~ CRAIG ZONIN Notary Public, State 0f New Y0rk No. 02Z05025539 Qualified i~ Su1~01k C0u~ , C0mmiss[o~ ~pires April 4, 20~ PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVlT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon~ Fri., 1/08/10 Re: Proposed Special Exception and Site Plan for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at th- Cutchogue Presbyterian Church SCTM#s: 1000-109~2-17.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, January 11, 2010, 6:00 p.m. OFF CIAL USE Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Oellve~ Fee (Endorsement Required) Postmark / ~ [~?-~%~ ....... ~utcho~ NY 11935 J gr~nnz W, ~Clln Jr. . P.O. Box 1 I g l ~ 51 E 80th Street I ~ [or,%:~x%~? ............. x~;,;,'c56 ................................ I ~" Total Podia, ge & F ~ [s~.ero , \.~ 300 Alb..a~..Z Street 1 ~,'-~,' ~ ~ ~; ~;~'"'R'6~,"Y6i:E;'T, PF T 02g0 .......................... [ ............ 1 Postage $ · I Restricted Delivery Fee I USE , Trt 410 New Suffolk Avenue F"- or PO BOX NO. lso,t ro Diocese of Rockville Centre I ~;r~'~ '~ b~7 X~:." ................ P:O;.'1BOX'eJ023' .............................. o~O ~o~,~. · .,q,,o~,viU,~ __ .,.l~..J.J.,~34-90g~ .............. Total Postage & F~~ Hem C3 OFFI Retum Receipt Fee (Endomemerd Required) Restrfcteq Oellv~ry Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Feee Postmark Cutcn-New Sutl Hst Councl 26850 Route 25 Mc~owan/Mlorew J. 111 1 it By-Pass Credit Trust m AL Sent To 123 Ix. or PO Box No. 38 Williams Street Sont To r'- orPOBoxNo. Lou J. Di~kerson ['x. or PO BOX NO. D ~_ or PO Box NO. ZIP+4 OFF Certified F~e Return Receipt Fee ( Endorsement Required) Restricted DellveP/Fee (Endorsement R~qulmd) Yore s~t ro Catherine J. Cartolano Diocese of R°Ck~ille Centre Dawn Blangiardo Certified Fee r-I Return Receipt Fee r-I (EndorSement Requffed) Rem4 Williamson Joyce Liv Trt 410 New Suffolk Avenue P.O. Box 111 Cutcl~gue, NY 11935 2. Arllcle Nurn~mr E [~ Cmfifled Meil [] Express Mall [] Regbtemci [] Return Receipt for ~ [] Insured M~I [] C.O.D, i · I4. Restflcted I~tlvery?.~Fee) ~ 7009 0960 0000 1559 6515 ~ · Pdr~ Yo~ name and addm~ o~ ~e mveme so that we csn rMum tl~ _ _c~l to you. · Attach thla c~d to the ba~i~ of the mallplece, or on the flont I~ apaoe permits. Patricia $; Lawrence P.O. Box 770 27585 Route 25 Cutchogue, NY 11935 2. Afficle Number Form 3811, Februmy 2004 by (P.n~d If YES, enter delivery ~cldress below: D ~ MNI D C.O.D. 4. ~ ~~) 7009 0960 0000 1559 6577 · Complete Items 1, 2, Item 4 if ~ Deltvepj Is desired. · Print your rmme m~d m~:Jre~m on the reverse 1. Article Addm~ml ~o: ~ LLC 38 Wit~ams Street Copial~ NY 11726 PS Form 3811, Fe~ae~y 2004 B. Received by ( Pr/nlsd N~ ,, D. ~ de~e~ eddmee d~emnt fl~,n ~em 17 7009 0960 0000 Dorne~tic R~um Recei~ 0 Ex~ Mail o P.e~me~d n R~m P~c~pt for ~, [] Insured Mffil [] C.O.D. 1559 6393 ~0 tlMl~ W~ ~[I~ l~U~l ~1~ Gll~d to yOU. Received b 1. ~a,~ D. Isdelive~ ~elivee/adclres~be4ow: ~'~Church of Sacred Heart ~iocese of Rockville Centre ;' P.O. Box 9023 Rockville Centre, NY 11571-9023 [] ~ Ma] r-I Rogial'm~l [] R~um l~ltol for [] Inaur~t Mail [] C.O,D. PS Form 38~ 1, Febmmy 2004 [:~m~t[c ~tum R~:o[pt X ~.~.-~,t,,~ .... [ Jeanne M. Minerva 26760 Route 25 Cutchogue, NY 11935 2. A rtlcleNumber 7009 0960 0000 1559 6270 ~ PS Form 3811, Februery 2004 =Retum Receipt .moa Cutchogue Fire District 260 New Suffolk Road Cutchog,~, NY 11935-2037 dMall ri Expmaa MaU m-'m ~d m"m a~um R~n~l [] Imufed Mall [] C.O.D. 7009 0960 Docneeflc 0000 1559 6522 o · ~ tteme 1,~, item 4 If Ree'h'~ed 1~4ve~ry Is deelmd. D. Is delivery address different from item 17 If YES, enter delivery address below: r~ Lou J. Dickerson P.O. Box 542 Cutchogue, NY 11935 2. ~ticle Number PS Form 3811, February 2004 ,~l Oeffilted Mall [] Express Mall r'lR~ ~ ~m R~N ~ I~ M~l D C.O.D. 4. ~ ~ ~) 7DD~ D~D DDDD ~55~ · Attach thb card to the back of tile mallpleFe' or on the front If space permits. ~; 1. A~tlcle Addressed to: Marjorie B. Swiatocha 395 Cases Lane P.O. Box 227 Cutchogue, NY 11935 I 2. Article Number B. Receh'ed by (~ Name) D. Is deth~7 ~ different from Item 17 ff YES, enter delivery addr~s below:. r'l Registered r'l Retum Reoalpt fl:~r M [] ~nsured M~l [] C.O.D. 4. Resb~ed Delivery? (Extra Fee) II ~,~,.~-~,~,:~,,v~:~ 7009 0960 0000 1559 6348 I PS Form 3811, February 2004 ~ Dome~ffio Retum Receipt 10~~. · Completlll~ 1,2, 81~ 3l,t~J8o com~'~ltlt8 ,~ ~ ~em 4 ff ~ ~,s ~.' X · ~m~r ~ ~on ~-~ or~~ 0200310000700001017 311 ] ~r LONG L~ ESTATES ~C 2442 ~CK ~ BELLMO~ ~ H7]0 ~ In~ ~1 D C.O.D. 4. 2.~ 7DD~ D~hD DDDD h55~ ~ ~ ~ 1, ~ 2~ ~c R~u~ R~ Complete'~s 1, 2, and 3. Also complete ~ Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Print your name and address on the reverso~ sO that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. ,Ntlcle Addressed to: Alan A. Cardinale P.O. Box 77 Mattituck, NY 11952 · Coml:flet~ items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Dellveqt is desired. · Print your name and addreo~ on the reverse sO that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the beck of the mailpisce, or on the front if spaca permits. Jerry Chrisafis 52/~8 Redfield Street Do~taston, NY 11362 (Transfer from **ml=e tabe0 PS Form 381 1, FebnJmy 2004 D. Is deliver/address different from item 1 ? If YES, enter deliveq/ad~ress below: 3. Type [] Registered [] Retum Receipt for M, [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Deliveqt;' ~tm F~e) [] 646~ I~s~ u ' / B. Received by (Prfnted Name) IC.D~ / D. ~delive~yaddressdifferentfmmlteml? I If YES, enter deliver7 address below: [] R~l~m Re.pt for M [] Insure~*Maik. ~J~ C.O.D. 7009 0960 0000 1559 6591 , Domestic Retum Receipt · Complete items 1, 2, item 4 If RsotrkYzed Dellve~ · Print your name and addmee on the reveme so that we can return the can:l to y~J. · Attach this card to the bac~( of the mallpiece, or on the front If spaoe permits. 1. Article Add~ to: Old ttouse Society lnc. Bressler, P.C. 13015 Route 25 P.O. Box 1424 Mattimck, NY 11952 byl [] Pa~emd 0 Pamm R~:a~lpt for m 4. Resbtcted Delivefl~ ~.~ra Fee) 700 960 0000 1559 6331 Domes'dc Retum Receipt · Pflnt your name and add~ off ~he revere · Attach th~ (~,'d to ~e back of the mellp~oe, or on the front If _%,~,~ permlt~. 28000 Main Road LLC P.O. Box 106 Mattimck, NY 11952 · Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Ale• complete item 4 If Resbicted Dedlvecy b desired. JAN 5 ? [] Rsglst~d [] Return Rec~pt for M~*'~ ~ .~ I o c.o.D. 1~o~1 I Cutchogue Presbyterian Ch:irch 27745 Route 25 P.O. Box 964 Cutchogue, NY 11935 C~¢fllted Mall [] Expme~ Mall Regl~emd [] Retum Receipt for Memhendise [] Ir~umd Mall [] C.O.D. Reetr~t~ [~h,~,/t (Extra Fee) OYes 2. Article Number PS Form 3811, February 2004 7009 0960 0000 1559 6478 or on me front If ~ pem~m. •agent D. b de~e~y addme~ different from Item 17 []Yes ff YES, ~ deliver/addrees below: [] No By-Pass Credit Trust 38;Hunt Farm Road WeScabuc, NY 10597 : PS Form ~81~; Feb~aW 2004 [] Irmured Mell [] ESq3fe~ Iv~l [] Return [] C.O.D. 4. Rmtrlcted Dellv~ (Extra Fee) •Yea 7009 0960 1559 6249 illllllllllC llli 7009 0960 0000 1559 6539 27980 Main Road LLC 5780 New Suftblk Avenue · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · pj~bl/our name and address on the reveme ~ we can re'mm the card to you.. · A-'~t~is ca~ to the back of the mmlpisce, or on the front if space permits. 1. A~flcle Addre~e~ to: Janet Moore 640 Cases Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 0 ~p~a E1 [ae~d 1:3 Remm Rece~ for Me~na~d~se F1 ~ ~ ~ C.O.D. ~ 2.~c~e~u~ 7009 0960 0000 1559 6294 ~ PS Fo~ 3811, Febm~ 2~ · Complete ita~ns 1, 2, and 3..Nso con4olete Item 4 if Restfloted Dellve~'y is dealred; · Pt~t Vou~ name anti ~ on the m Cutchogue Presbyterian Chu~h 27415 Route 25 P.O. Box 964 Cutchogae, NY 11935 B.~b ENo [] C.O.D. 4. Raa~cted De~ ~Jdm ~e) FIye~ IIIIIIIIl l , JIIIIII II 7009 0960 0000 1559 6508 27850 Main Road LLC 5780 New Suffolk Avenue 7009 0960 0000 1559 6584 x.~Q/ Catherine J. Cartolano ~ [] ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN [] OTHER J~.._NO SUCH NUMBER! STREET m~I"NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND December 28, 2009 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDP. ESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southaid, NY 11971 OVP'ICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southaid, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Re: Review of EAF for T-mobile Northeast Presbyterian Church SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Located: 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Planning Department is in receipt of an application to co-locate a wireless facility on an existing church steeple located at the Presbyterian Chumh in Cutchogue. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on October 7, 2009 whereas, the Board will assume lead agency at their January 11, 2009 public hearing. The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form to your office for review and to provide an estimate for your consultant services for the above mentioned. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Senior Planner Cc; Enc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director EAF Site plan application Engineer report (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTEJqNA~ MOUNTED WITHIN DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRAT*VE PURPOSES ONLY. ExlSrlU~ SaTE PARTIAL W£ST £L£¥ATION APPURTENANOES SHOWN ARE BASED UPON F1EIJ) OBSERVATIONS AND ARE sumEcr ro ~mUSmEN~. ~U_ 07-7199 T ~ . PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH SCXl~: 35~SUN~EHIGH~/AY 6REAT~IVER, NY 1173~ OF CUTCHOGUE ~.~X)~ ".~/ SUPPORT POSTS AND E3(~T1NG pARtqNG LOT XX~<~. ) ,~' ~ ~ PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUlPMERlr COMPOUND. SEE '-~, ! Fief'- ~ ~1 PARKING~ I ~ ~o me[ //~PROt=O~ED ROUTE OF ANTENNA CABLE~ FROM PROPOSED ~. : J~ ~-j . ~_~ ,..,"~(8) PROPOSED T--MOB1LE ANTENNA.~ MOUNTED WITHIN ~ i , ~-~-_ d i J/ EROdeD R.F. COMPAT1BL~ CONCEALMENT MATERIAL ~ ; i~'~ ~'~ CHUROH S'I~PLE (1YP, (2) PER SECTOR), SE~ L~-4 ~ / h [ [x,s..o i~ /~f [OR .~E ,.~0.~0. ~ / I / -F REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE ~ MAIN ROAD (ROUTE 25) : SITE PLAN 0%7199 1 o8/10~}7 wmm ' SITE PLAN 1 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH LI-13-807.c SO.F~ 3500~UNRISEHIGH~IAY6FcATRIVER, flYI1739 ]OF CUTCHOGUE ~.^~.o: ~ .......................... 27245 MAIN RD. LE 2 3 PROPOSED ARBOR~TAES BEI~EEN PROPOSED GATE SUPPORT POSTS ANO EXISTING PARKING PROPOSED CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD (1) PROPOSED T--MOBILE BAT'FERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PAD -- (1) PROPO~I~) T-MOBILE Ubll~ C,I~INET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED CONCRETE pA[ -- EDGE OF EXISTING PARKING LOT EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN NOTE: LOCATION BASEO SYSTEM (E-911 EQUIPMENT) TO 8E INSTALLED - NOT DEPICTED EQUIPMENT LAYOUT SCALE: 3/32'~-1'-0" X (2) 21 '-6' SUDING GATES AND EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE SUPPORT SYSTEM O"fP OF (2)) -- (6) PROPOSED FENCE PO~ TO SUPPORT SUDING GATE TRACK SYSTEM (3 PER GATE) -- PROPOSED HORIZONTN. 'IRACK TO GUIDE PROF'OSE~) ~LIDIRO GATES NOTE.S: THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH u-u-8o?.c sc.,.;.: 35IlO$UNRI~HI§HWAY 6~T~/EP~h7 11739 OF CUTCHOGUE ,,,~.~,o~o: .,~., ~'~'~'~ ............... ........ LE3 3 PO~TS TO SUPPORT SUOING F~NC(3 PER C~TE) (~) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATrERT PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32"- l'-0" ~,.,,:,.,,,¥:r'~ ~; ~, - PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Ll-13-807-C ............. ..... 27245 U^'N Rg. LE 5 3 #9597 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successively, commencing on the 24th day of December, 2009. Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this day of 2009. -276 of the Town the Code of the will Planning -Main Road, Llth day of the fel- · . NSKIcHRJSTINA VOL NOTARY pUF,.,t. IC-STATE OF NEW YORK No, O1-V06105050 QuoE~ied in Suffolk County o Ho- E SOIJTHOLD ' ' _ ~'OWN PLANNING BOARD *;' ' -" M~tinH. Sidor . · Chairman 9597-1T 19J~4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~ylCE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 11th day of January, 2010 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Special Exception & Site Plan of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC located at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, on the n/e corner of Main Road and Highland Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-109-2-17.1 6:05 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision of Joseph & Heidi Battaglia located at 1720 Hobart Road, on the w/s/o Hobart Road, approximately 1,059 feet n/o Terry Lane, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-64-3-3 Dated: 12/15/09 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 24, 2009 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPYSENT TO: The Suffolk Times Page 1 of 1 Kalin, Carol From: Legals [legals@timesreview.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:56 AM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: RE: Legal Ad for 12/12 edition Hi Carol, We are good to go for the 12/24 issue. Thanks and have a great afternoon! Candice From: Kalin, Carol [mailto:CaroI.Kalin@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:40 AM To: Legals Subject: Legal Ad for 12/12 edition Please print the attached legal ad in the 12/24/09 edit on of the Suffolk Times for the Southold Town Planning Board's public hearings on Jan. 11, 2010 for: T-Mobile NE at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Chumh and Joseph & Heidi Battaglia. Kindly send an e-mail confirming receipt. Enjoy your time off! Carol Kalin, Secretarial Assistant Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Annex, 54375 NYS Rt. 25 P.O. Box ! 179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631 )765 - 1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Carol. Kalin~town.southold.ny.us 12/15/2009 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing M~I[JNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 11th day of January, 2010 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Special Exception & Site Plan of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC located at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, on the n/e corner of Main Road and Highland Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-109-2-17.1 6:05 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision of Joseph & Heidi Battaglia located at 1720 Hobart Road, on the w/s/o Hobart Road, approximately 1,059 feet n/o Terry Lane, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-64-3-3 Dated: 12/15/09 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Martin H. Sidor Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 15th day of December, 2009 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,' New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board~ Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 1/11/10 Re,qular Meetin,q: 6:00 p.m. 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Special Exception and Site Plan for T- Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church, SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Public Hearing for the proposed Standard Subdivision of Joseph & Heidi Battaglia, SCTM#1000-64-3-3 Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this Nota~-.~blic MELANIE O0ROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC, State 0! New York No. 01D04634870 Qualified in Suffolk County %.~,, ~ommission Expires September 30~.~r u PLANNING BOARD M]EMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND December 15, 2009 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAIL~IG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. cio Amato & Associates 666 Old Country Rd., Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re' Set Hearing: Proposed Special Exception & Site Plan for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Chumh Located at 27245 Main Road, on the n/e corner of Main Road and Highland Road, in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Zoning Districts: R-40 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, December 14, 2009: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, January 11, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. regarding the special exception consideration and site plan prepared by Neil Alexander MacDonald, R.A., dated October 08, 2008, last revised December 16, 2008. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, January 8th. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearin.q. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Martin H, Sidor Chairman Encls. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a special exception and a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-40 Zoning District; That the application is for a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a new wireless communication facility where the antennas are to be mounted within an existing church steeple, and the base station equipment is to be located outside the building in a screened enclosure. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site. The property is located at 27245 Main Road, on the n/e corner of Main Road and Highland Road, in Cutchogue; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Ave. & NYS Rte. 25, Southold (2nd FI., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. The office will be closed 12124 at 11:30 a.m., 12/25, t2/31 at 11:30 a.m., 111110 for the holidays. Information can also be obtained via the internet by sending an e-mail message to: Carol. Kalin@town.southold.ny.us; That a public hearing will be held on these matters by the Planning Board on Mondayt January 11, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church Date: 12/15/09 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVlT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 1108110 Re: Proposed Special Exception and Site Plan for T-Mobile Northeast~ LLC at the Cutchogue Presbyterian Church SCTM#s: 1000-109-2-17.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, January 11~ 2010, 6:00 p.m. Town of $outhold PC/Codebook for Y~indows § 55-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L. No. 12-2003] Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application or petition is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. Notice relating to a public hearing on an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A. Town responsibility for publication ofnotice. The reviewing board or commission shall canse a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiated, proposed or requested by an applicant or petitioner, other than a Town board or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: (1) The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, giving notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than l0 feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant, petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall include description of the street location and area of the subject property, nature of relief or approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant, petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. CUTCHOGUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH SITE PLAN FOR T-MOBILE NORTHEAST *1000-109-2-17.1 Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a public utility wireless communication facility. The request is for co-location of antenna interior mounted within an existing church steeple, including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. eMONDAY - JAN. 11, 2010 - 6:00 P.M. ?,2 ~ Z 9,2 z Z Z \ Z I~ COLJNTY OF SLJFFOLK (~) \ 4.4 Winsert Krist~ From: Sent: To: Subject: Winser, Kristy Tuesday, December 01, 2009 2:55 PM 'waltercooper@verizon.net' proposed wireless facility, Cutchogue NY Walter Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLc, at the Presbyterian Church, Cutchogue 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-1-17.1 As previously discussed, the applicant has submitted the consultant fee for the above application in the amount of $1,750.00 ( I believe that you will send an invoice at some point). We respectfully request that you commence review of this application. On a side note, one of our Planning Board members had a concern with the technical reports submitted in connection to this application. Evidently the reports made no mention to colocation on a pre-existing tower located on route 48 in Cutchogue approx 300 feet west of Cox lane? If you think this is relevant or an oversight from either party please let us know. Contact me anytime with questions you may have or additional information you may need. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy. Winser~,town.southold.ny.us & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW SUITE 204 METUCHEN, NJ 08840 November 20, 2009 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Kristy Winser Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc.'s ("T-Mobile") Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility (the "Communication Facility") to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: I000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17.1 ~the "Property") T~Mobile Site Ref.: LI- 13 -807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103 -400 Dear Ms. Winser: As requested, enclosed is a check, in the amount of $1,750, and payable to the Town of Southold, representing the required fee for the escrow fund to be created tbr the Tobin's technical consultant. As discussed, with this submission, we respectfully request that the Plannin Board schedule · g the Application for the next available public hearing at its next ineeting to be held on December ! 4. 2009. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate tO contact our office. Thank you tbr your continuing time and attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez Encl. CC: Tim Fincham (via email, w/out encl.) Howard Leger (via email, w/out encl.) Gina Jacobellis (via email, w/out encl.) ~EPARTMENT OF PLANNING COI NTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE THOMAS A. ISLES, A.I.C.P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING November 17, 2009 Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Re; S.C.T.M. No.: S.C.P.C. No.: T Mobile Northeast, LLC 1000-10200-0100-017001 SD-09-LD Dear Ms. Winser: Your notification for SEQRA Coordination was received by our agency on October 14, 2009. Please be advised that our agency, the Suffolk County Planning Commission, has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming Lead Agency status for the above referenced. The Suffolk County Planning Commission reserves the right to comment on this proposed action in the future and wants to be kept informed of all actions taken pursuant to SEQRA and to be provided with copies of all EAF's, DEIS's and FEIS's, etc. APF:ds LOCATION Il. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY Chief Planner MAILING ADDRESS P. O. BOX 6100 HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 (631) 853-5191 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 IATO & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW SUITE 204 · November 4, 2009-, VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Kristy Winser Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipmm Commuifi'~htions, Ific?~'('~T-Mobile'') Application ("Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility (the "Commtmication Facility") to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17.1 (the "Property") T-Mobile Site Reft: LI-13-807-C/Presb,/terian Church/Our File No.: 103-460 Dca,.' Ms. Winser: Following up on the Planning Board's work session on October 5, 2009, and pursuaq~t to your request, enclosed are the following materials to further support l'-Mobile's Application: Nine (9) copies of revised Zoning Drawings, prepared by Wiltiarn F. Collins Architects LLP, and updated to include on Sheet SP-1 all adjacent lm~d uses, structures and zoning within 500 feet of the Property; Seven (7) additional copies of the FCC compliance report prepared by Scinetics Corporation; and Seven (7) additional copies of the propagation maps prepared by T-Mobile's Radio Frequency Engineer. Please note that we are in the process of obtaining the required fee for the escrow fund to be created for the Fown's technical consultant. Upon rec,,~pt of this snbmiss~on, please connrm thc status of the To,aq~ departmental review of the Application, m~d the anticipated time frame for complctkm of this process, and scheduling of a hearing before the Plmming Board. AMATO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Ve~3~ truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez Encls. Tim Fincham (via email, w/out encls.) Howard Leger (via email, w/out encls.) Neil MacDonald (via email, w/out encls.) Marjorie Lindsay (via email, w/out encls.) Gina Jacobellis (via email, w/out encls.) CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT Board of Fire Commissioners /?3 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Telephone (631) 734-6907 ° Fax (631) 734-7079 E-mall: cutfd@optonline.net www. cutchoguefiredept, org October 31, 2009 Town of Southold Planning Board Office PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Dear Kristy Winser, With reference to your memorandum of October 7, 2009 concerning the T- Mobile Tower within the church steeple, the Cutchogue Fire District Board of Fire Commissioners has no objection to this tower installation. Thank you for your correspondence, we remain, Very truly yours, Board of Fire Commissioners Matthew Martin ~~Fire District Secretary Matthew J. Martin, Secretary Board. of Fir~,C~missioners ............... Robert Fisher Chairman James R. Fogarty Sr., Joseph S. Zuhoski Jr. Sanford H. Friemann, Arthur W. Brewer Peter Zwerlein, Treasurer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'tCE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 October 27, 2009 Gregory R. Alvarez, Esq. Amato & Associates, P.C. 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Site Plan & Special Exception Consideration T-mobile Northeast, LLC at Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-2-17.1 Dear Mr. Alvarez: The Planning Department is conducting a review of the above application. Pursuant to §280-74 of the Town Code, the Planning Board has determined to hire a technical consultant to review the application and to require the submission of $1,750 into an escrow account with the Town Comptroller's office to cover the cost of the technical consultant's review. As such please remit a check in the amount of $1,750 payable to the Town of Southold, as soon as possible. Receipt of this fee is a condition to a determination that your application is complete. Thank you. Sincerely, Hea er Lanza Town Planning Director STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 www.nysdot.gov October 26, 2009 Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Your October 7, 2009 Submission Omnipoint - First Presbyterian Church NY 25, Cutchogue SCTM No. 1000-10900-0200-017001 Our Case No. 09-398P Dear Ms. Winser: This is to acknowledge receipt of the Town's submission of the above application. The Tax Map Number you provided does not appear to be correct. We have listed above what appears to be the correct Tax Map Number. A review of the proposed work indicates that this project will not have a significant impact on the NYS highway system. As long as all work takes place within the applicant's property, the NYS highway fight-of-way (ROW) is not used to perform any work and the NYS highway ROW is not used to stage vehicles or equipment a Highway Work Permit is not required from us. This application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or 1-495, (whichever is farther south), to Long Island Sound in the north. We also suggest that visual screening of the equipment be considered as part of the SEQRA process. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973 at the above address. Please always refer to the subject Case Number and the County Tax Map Number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Orfsina[ Signed By Shaik A. Saad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: ~ Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold xflqlr. Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Wendy Brodsky, Long Island North Shore Heritage Area Planning Commission SAS:MDW:ajf 4:00 p.m. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, October 26, 2009 4:00 p.m. Site Plans and Subdivisions i ~0~!0~i The..P.resbyter a~ .~ rch ~[S~.cie~. p:[ ~ ut~h.o.g .ue_.~.-~5. Main ~0a~ Description: The applicant requests co-location of a public utili~ wireless ~ communication facility having interior mounted antennas within an existing church steeple and a related storage equipment area screened ~ from view. As pa~ of the application, the applicant proposes to remove '. and replace a potion of an existing church steeple to match the existing ~hu[ch bq!~ding..0~ a 0.9~;~.~[~ ~ite.!~ i~ t~e...~;.~0 Zoning Dis~[~C~ Status: New Site Plan & S~e~ia~..E~cepfi~n..~pp!~ca~io~s ................................... ':'~ti~'~ ~: ~'~ from consultant for technical review se~ices, and ~ consider authorizing consultant to proceed w th the review. Project name: Southview Preserve ~ SCTM#: 1000-87-5-21.4, 21.7, 21.8, 21.9, 21.10 & 21.11 Location: South side of Main Bayview Road, approximately 900' east of Cedar Drive in Southold Description: Subdivide a 14.54-acre parcel into three lots where Lot 1 equals 44,735 s.f., Lot 2 equals 37,343 s.f. and Lot 3 equals 42,470 s.f., with the remaining ~11~53.ac.~es.o~.the. p[operty to.be p.re~er~/~d .as.c!P~ space~ Status: Conditiona! Pre!im!n.ary App[o~a! '~ Attac!~m.en.ts.i Letter from App!!~t Discussion: 1. New Comprehensive Plan 2. Kace LLC (Northwind Village) DEIS review- Review comments done to date 3. Litigation update October 19, 2009 Ms. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Walter A. Cooper Radio Frequency Planning & Consultation 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 757-220-9442 RE: Town of Southold - T-Mobile Northeast, at Presbyterian Church, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-10~t~-17.1 ~- Dear Ms. Winser: I have reviewed the material regarding the T-Mobile application. It appears that some additional information may be needed from the applicant in order to clarify and/or complete the application. Following are the services I can provide to assist the Town in acting on this application. · Prepare questions and comments to solicit the information required to act on the application. · Review, comment on and verify as necessary, the additional information provided by the applicant, including applicant's calculations and technical (radio frequency related) submissions regarding demonstration of need, proposed coverage, capacity, non-ionizing radiation exposure compliance, equipment and material choices. · If required, recommend facility design changes to minimize visual or environmental impact or to otherwise comply with Town regulations. · Provide the Town with a report and recommendations regarding the disposition of the application. Any additional tasks will be performed only after your written authorization by e-mail or otherwise. My fee for the above services will be calculated at an hourly rate of $100.00, which will be invoiced monthly. I will also be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses for authorized travel and living costs, express postage, printing and copies. Travel by private vehicle will be reimbursed at the then-current IRS private vehicle rate. Ms. Kristy Winser Town of Southold, NY October 19, 2009 Page 2 Based on my understanding of this application, and assuming it will not be necessary to attend public hearings, I estimate that the total fee will not exceed $1,750.00, including expenses. If you find this arrangement satisfactory, please provide an e-mail or other written authorization to proceed. Meanwhile, thank you again for requesting this proposal. Very truly yours, Walter A. Cooper PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OI~'ICE LOCATION: Town HaH Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To; Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Southold Town Building Department* Southold Town Engineer* Southold Town Landmark Preservation Committee* Architectural Review Committee Suffolk County Planning Commission* NYS DOT* Cutchogue Fire District* From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: October 7, 2009 RE: Site Plan & Special Exception consideration for - T-mobile Northeast, LLC Request for comments pursuant to General Municipal Law §239 (as a referral) and Southold Town Code §280-131, and LWRP Coastal Consistency Review · SEQR Lead Agency request · Coordinated review under SEQR Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to seek comments from your agency, and also to determine lead agency and coordinate review under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. Please provide the following, as applicable: 1. Comments or requirements the Planning Board should take into consideration while reviewing the proposed project; 2. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated; 3. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; and T-mobile Northeast LLC & SEQR Coordination Page Two October 6, 2009 4. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency under SEQR. The lead agency will determine the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. The following page contains information pertaining to the project under review. For further information, please feel free to contact this office. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Project Name: T-mobile Northeast LLC Address: 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue Tax Map #: 1000-10~-~:17.1 Requested Action: The applicant requests a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a public utility wireless communication facility. The request is for co-location of antenna interior mounted within an existing church steeple, including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( ) Type II (X) Unlisted Contact Person: KristyWinse~ Sr. Planner (631) 765-1938 Enclosures: · Environmental Assessment Form · Site Plan Application Form · Site Plan(s) (site plans sent only to above agencies indicated by an *) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MART~I H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND October 9, 2009 Mr. Walter A. Cooper 117 Walnut Hills Drive Williamsburg, VA 23185 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OvI~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC, at the Presbyterian Church, Cutchogue 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-1-17.1 Dear Mr. Cooper, Please find enclosed an application to co-locate a wireless facility in a church steeple in Cutchogue. The applicant requests a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a public utility wireless communication facility. The request is for co-location of antenna intedor mounted within an existing chumh steeple, including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing chumh steeple to match the existing chumh building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. Please provide an estimate to me for the cost of your consulting services for the above request pursuant to the amendments to Wireless Communications Facilities Chapter 280 of the Southold Town Code in accordance with §280-72 (Site Plan Approval) & §280-74 (Special Exception). The report I would like to have on the project is an overview of the application in connection to the General Requirements and requirements for permitted use in §280-72. Also, review and analysis of the technical requirements and permits for the application would be appreciated. For your convenience, I have enclosed a site plan and a color copy of the visual analysis but will email you the rest of the file. If you require hard copies of any of the information provided to you please let me know. Thank you for your time. Please contact me with any questions. ~W, e~~~ .Best reaards, Senior Planner Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 October 6, 2009 Amato & Associates, P.C. Att: Gregory R. Alvarez 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Site plan & Special Exception Consideration T-mobile Northeast, LLC at Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-1-17.1 Dear Mr. Alvarez; I'm writing as a follow up to the work session held on October 5, 2009 where the Planning Board formally accepted the above referenced applications for review and the following actions were taken. Please revise in accordance with the following comments and resubmit directly to the Planning Department: Submit a 500-foot radius map for review. Said map shall include zoning, land uses and the location of structures within 500 feet of the subject parcel. Submit (7) copies of the RF engineer report prepared and signed by Louis G. Cornacchia. In addition submit (7) copies of the propagation maps in connection to the RF affidavit analysis. 3. The application will be referred to the Town, county, and state agencies having jurisdiction as per Town Code section 280-131c. 4. The application will also be referred to an independent consultant hired by the Town where the applicant will pay the consulting fee determined. 5. The Board agreed to begin the SEQRA process for this unlisted action having the Planning Board as the Lead Agency. Application of T-mobile Northeast, LLC at Presbyterian Church p. 2 Additional comments will be provided following full review by staff, the Town Planning Board, Town departments and involved/interested agencies. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Kristy Winser CC: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, October 5, 2009 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Site Plans and Subdivisions Pmject narq~[ .... wi!!iam p.e~.~y (Tidy Ca[ ) ..... [ SCTM#: 1000:5.~-5-2:~ ............... Lo(~a~.on .............. s/w. co[ne~ o):.R0ut.~..48 and ~oungs A~'e.~. So~l~!d ..................... Description: The applicant requests to condu~ motor vehicle and accesso~ sales on a previously developed 1.49-acre parcel located in the General Business Zoning District. Status ~ Amended S te P an A~ion: Review site plan and recommend for the Planning Board to accept the application for review and stad the referral pro,ss. Also consider wriffen ~9~me.nt~ to the ZB~ ~ pre~0US!Y ~e~ue~.~ ......... A~a~eqts; ........ ~ ~.~ .................................................. Location: ~he presbyteda~ Ql~B~.c.h.or Sqqe~y Rf Cutchqg~ ~724.~..~!a!n Road ...... Description: The applicant requests a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a i: public utility wireless communication facility. The request is for co- location of antenna interior mounted within an existing church steeple ~ including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church bu ding on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning..D.!.strict. ........................ i New Site Plan S~atu.sl ..................................... Action: i Review site plan and recommend for the Planning Board to accept the i app!.!.c~t.ion.~q.~[ev!ew and start ~he..~efe~ral p~c~ss: Attachments: ~ Staff ~P0~ ............................... an existing farm stand using existing buildings on site, In addition, the site provides existing parking of 28 spaces and provides new parking of 46 spaces along with a new loading area for trucks. The overall property is 15.81 acres in , [ .s..~_atu~.'. ...... .................................. Ac~.!~ql ............................... ............. ~, At~a.ch~r~tsl SEQRA Determination Resolution ........... ~. ~[gj~..n.~i ............... Adip!et[o Robert ............ i SCTM#:` .!.000.~74-3;~!.(~ ................... Location: e/s/o Peconic Lane app[~)~mate!y ~3.ff~ s/0 County Road 48~ !q..Pec0nic Description: This proposed standard subdivision is to subdivide a 2.038-acre parcel into three lots, where Lot I equals 20,229 sq. ft., Lot 2 equals 29,817 sq. f. and Lot 3 equa s 29 2~!. ~q:.ft~...in t..he.~B z0 r~!.n.g.. E~!s..trict · Statu~ i Cond t ona Pre minary App[q~al .............. Action: :: Request extension O~ C0ndi~iona Pre rn n.~ryApproval. Exten~!0r~ ........... PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 September 15, 2009 Amato & Associates, P.C. Att: Gregory R. Alvarez 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Omnipoint Communications at Presbyterian Church 27245 Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-1-17.1 Dear Mr. Alvarez; The Planning Department is conducting a review for completeness of the above mentioned site plan application received August 21, 2009. Once it has been determined that your file is complete, you will be notified of when the application will be scheduled for a work session. Thank you. Sincerely, Kristy Winser cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director VIA HAND DELIVERY Planning Board Town of Southold 53085 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 ViATO & ASSOCIATES, COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9th Floor GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK 11530 TEL: (516) 227-6363 FAX: (516) 227-6367 SUITE 204 METUCHEN, NS 08840 TEL: (752) 317-1Sll FAX: (752) 317-1513 ^u us 000 t Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC, ("T-Mobile") f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc.'s ("Omnipoint") Special Exception and Site Plan Applications to the Town of Southold (the "Town") in connection with the proposed public utility communication facility (the "Communication Facility") to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, District: 1000, Section: 109, Block: 2, Lot: 17.1 (the "Property") Omnipoint Site Ref.: LI-13-807-C/Presbyterian Church/Our File No.: 103-400 Dear Sir or Madam: We represent T-Mobile in connection with the above matter. In support ofT-Mobile's Site Plan Application, enclosed are the following materials for submission to the Town: 1. One (1) copy of the Application for a Building Permit denial, issued by the Town; 2. One (1) original Site Plan Application form; pursuant to § 280-133(A)(1) 3. One (1) original Environmental Assessment Form; pursuant to § 280-133(A)(3) 4. Nine (9) copies of the Zoning Drawings, prepared with the following information, as ~ ~equired by the site plan application requirement checklist: , ,? %4, ~ a. Adjacent land uses structures and zoning within 500 feet :'~'~ ~,t>c~' b. Location in latitude and longitude, type and height of the ~. ,, ~ ,'t~~ Communication Facility; A~, "- ) ~7' c Separation Distances from Communication Facility; ,xt,', d. Fall zone radius and distances; /~ '* e. Proposed means of access; and f. Elevation Drawings. 5. Four (4) copies of a Property Survey; pursuant to § 280-133(A)(5) 6. Seven (7) copies of the Building Permit Application; 7. Four (4) copies of Health Report; AMATO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 11. 12. 13. Seven (7) copies of structural letter, documenting compliance with local, state and federal codes; Seven (7) copies of FCC License; One (1) copy of the TOWAIR Determination; One (1) copy of the Visual Impact Analysis with photo-sims; Search Ring for the Communication Facility; and A check, payable to the Town of Southold, in the amount of $2,000, representing the site plan application fee. In addition, in support of T-Mobile's Special Exception Application, enclosed are the following materials for submission to the Town: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. One (1) copy of the Building Permit Application form; One (1) copy of the Site Plan Application form; One (1) original Special Exception Application form; One (1) copy of a Due Diligence Affidavit; One (1) original Collocation Affidavit; One (1) copy of Inventory Map and Lisl, to be provided under separate cover; Technical Consultant Fees (to be determined); One (1) copy of Lease Agreement between Omnipoint and Property owner; One (1) copy of RF Analysis and Site Propagation Map and Supporting Evidence of Inadequate Service; One (1) copy of a Search Ring Study, to be provided under separate cover; and A check, payable to the Town of Southold, in the amount orS 1,000, representing the special exception permit application fee. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Gregory R. Alvarez Encls. CCl Tim Fincham (via email, w/o encls.) Howard Leger (via email, w/o encls.) Neil MacDonald (via email, w/o encls.) Marjorie Lindsay (via email, w/o encls.) Gina Jacobellis (via email, w/o encls.) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex . 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Heather Lanza, Planning Director April 13, 2009 Planning Report - Wireless Facilities Building Permit Application Omnipoint Communications at Presbyterian Church, Cutchogue. 1000-109-2-17.1 The Planning Department has reviewed the application referenced above. This application is for a new wireless facility on a property located in the R-40 zoning district. Pursuant to new Southold Town Code Article XVII enacted in February, 2009, §280-70 states that any new proposed wireless facility located in a zone other than LI, LIO, B, HB, MI, or MII requires Special Exception approval by the Planning Board, as well as site plan approval. Please also accept this report as a response to the Site Plan Use Determination form. Please contact me with any questions. Thank you. l/t'e~v 3a. Proposed vie~v of the equipment compound,fi'om the rear parking lot. looking Eaxl. 27245 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. Site Number £I- 13-80 , k?en, 3. Existing view of the equipment compound fi'om the rear parki~4 lot looking East. z 27245 Main Road ~ CONSULT NG SERVICES, INC. Cutchogue, NY t 1935 M,,hwd[L NJ 07430 LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF ALAN CARDJNALE MAP OF HIGHLAND ESTATES FILED 4/26/1977, FILE No. 6537. LOT 39 I I I I I STORy BUILDING S 4...fi'57'10' W ~°'~ CGREENPORT ROAD) CS.R. 2,5) -- OH CONCRETE CURB DROP CURB WALL EDGE OF PAVEMENT OVERHEAD WIRES ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX TELEPHONE CONTROL SOX WELL CATCH BASIN DRAINAGE INLET / STRUC'RJRE SIGN LIGHT POLE U TILIT~ POLE STOCKADE FENCE WOOD FENCE CONCRETE GUY W~RE MONUMENT 1. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR A SPECIF~C PURPOSE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR A TRANSFER OF TITLE OR ANY FINANCIAL PURPOSE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED W~THOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND THEREFORE~ THE EXISTENCE OF ANY COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD, ~F ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN OR ADDRESSED. 3. EASEMENTS. RiGHTS--OF--WAY OF RECORD, iF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN. 4. PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS WERE NOT PLACED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. S. SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL COND/]]ONS WERE NOT EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. 6. THE OFFSETS OR D~MENSIONS SHOWN FROM THE STRUCTIJRES TO THE PROPERT~ LINES ARE FOR A SPECiFiC PURPOSE AND USE AND THEREFORE ARE NOT INTENDED TO GUIDE IN THE ERECTION OF FENCES, RETAINING WALLS, POOLS, PAT]OS, PLANT/NG AREAS, ADDITIONS TO BUILDINGS OR ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION 7. PART OF PROPERTY APPEARS ON THE MAP OF HIGHLAND ESTATES, FILED 4/26/1977, FILE No. 65,~7. B. LOT AREA ---- 39.725 SQ. FT. OR 0.91 ACRES. ,Ir Civil Engineers Surveyors Planners PR [ Cl~c~a b~ WJB Barre Bonacci & Van 75A Commerce Drl~ Hauppauge, NY 11788 631.435.1022 TaxMap: DIEI~ICT 1000 SECTION 109 BLOCK2 LOT 17.1 TOWN OF SOUIHOID PROPERTY SffUA'm CUTCHOGUE 5Ufl~OLK COUNIY, N.Y. BOUNDARY SURVEY AUGUST30,2O07 A07 28 i of 1 t SI'lB PLAN STATUS REPORT ~ SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED NEW WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE PROJECT NAME: ZONEh Z0NE2: LOCATION: HAMLET: -- scrM# ooo- / ZONE3; OWNER NAME: TEL# APPLICANT NAME: : TEk# AGENT NAME: ; t~ ~_/-~ TEL# PROJECT DESCRIFFION: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: WITHIN 301 ZBA .~ INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: ~ECEFVED DATE:~/~/~ APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: RECEIVED: AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ ~.10/SF, AMENDEDsP:$250.+.10/SF, AGRICSP:FLAT$500 "~ FEE AMOUNT: ($ .00 X -$, )~$.10 X SF-$,_ ) =$ .NEW APPLICATION WORK SESSION {~v£ri-uN 10 DAYS OF RECE1Fr), PB ACCEPTED Y OR N APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (Vv3TH1N 30 DAYS OF REV/EW) BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEEETING 100-254B3 (V, rlTHIN 30 DAYS) NOTES: ~EVISED SUBM/SSION RECEIVED: ~ NOTES: / AGENCIES: (WITH MAPS=W/P) APPROVALE REQUIRED: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMWFEE: LWRP COORDINATOR: BUILDING D._~ARTMENT CERT FICATION* =IRE COMMISStONERS: TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAl.: DEP.OF TRANSPORTATION DOT DPW__, TO$ SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PL,~dNING: (TYPE I :__ TYPE2:__UNLISTED: REFERRED DATE NOTES $CDPW u0r~s ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: DISTIRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT CONDITIONAL FI NAI.:___~__/_..__, NOTES Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Project: Special Exception & Site Plan application for a Wireless Communication Facility. Preparer: Kdsty Winser, Senior Planner Date: May 17, 2010 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at Cutchogue Presbyterian Church SCTMN#: 109-2-17.1 Street Location: 27245 Main Road Hamlet: Cutchogue Type of Site Plan:New Property Owner: Cutchogue Presbyterian Church Applicant: Amato & Assoc Agent: Gregory Alverez Plan Prepared By: Nell Alexander MacDonald R.A. Date of Map: 10108/08, last revised 12/16/08 Submission Date: 08/21/09 Zoning District: . R-40 SEQRA CLASS: Unlisted Coordinated Review Call of Meeting: The applicant requests a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a public utility wireless communication facility. The request is for co-location of antenna interior mounted within an existing church steeple, including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. II. Site Analysis The subject property is an existing site 39,725 sq. ft. parcel located in the R-40 zoning district improved with a church building with attached steeple 65 feet high from average grade and associated parking area. The proposed wireless facility will consist of (8) panel antennas concealed within the existing church steeple having portions removed and replaced with a replicated version created in RF (radio frequency) stealth material. Also there will be an equipment storage area located in a linear fashion 15 feet setback, from the east property line approx 72 feet south of the north property line. The area will consist of 4 equipment cabinets and one battery back up and one UMTS cabinet enclosed by a 6 -foot vinyl fence and (20) arborvitae 6'foot in height surrounding the area for screening purposes. Application for T-mobile Northeast LLC, p.2 II1: Permits and/or Review Required From Other Agencies: · Carrier licensed by FCC - Submitted · Power density analysis- Prepared and signed by Louis G. Comacchia stating the proposed is below the Max Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits established by the FCC. - The applicant is in compliance with the FCC MPE of 1,000 General public or "unrestricted environment "standard set by the (NYSDOH). · Power density will need to be corroborated by an independent RF engineer. · Structural Inspection Report, submitted by Nicholas J. Deflice, P.E. for the Steel dunnage platform adequate. · Lease agreement- Submitted · Due Diligence Affidavit- Submitted. Site meets criteda for location, height, antenna clearance, network coverage and equipment space were meet. This site will remedy the service deficiency and will provide adequate service for customers in the search area. · Co-location Affidavit- submitted. No objection to third party collocation provided no interference with T-mobile, and can obtain a lease agreement with the property owner proper approvals. · FAA -Shall comply with applicable airport and/or airspace hazard and/or obstruction regulations- Applicant Submitted a TOWAIR determination that states that the structure does not require registration. · Cutchogue Fire District- ok · Building Inspector Certification- ok · Drainage review from Town Engineer-ok · LWRP review for consistency- consistent · ARC-Ok · SEQR- Reviewed by Nelson Pope & Voorhees. Negative Declaration 4/13/10 IV: Special Exception Considerations: Construction of proposed facility is a public necessity: Copies of an RF analysis with site propagation map and supporting evidence of inadequate service were submitted for review and shown to have a serious deficiency in T-mobiles coverage in the search area provided. The applicant has made substantial effort to co-locate with existing wireless facilities, or has made substantial effort to locate on municipally-owned land or structures, or with in existing structures: A Co-location Affidavit was submitted that states that T-mobile Northeast has no objection to third party co-location provided there will be no interference with T-mobile, and such party can obtain a lease agreement with the property owner proper approvals. Additionally a Due Diligence Affidavit was submitted for review. Also the alternative sites, which are located one-half mile of the site, are also suitable to remedy the service deficiency for T-mobile but are unavailable for leasing. Application for T-mobile Northeast LLC, p.3 Them are compelling reasons, which make it more feasible to construct the proposed facilities rather than alternatives: The applicant has submitted a due diligence affidavit stating that the subject parcel site meets criteria for location, height, antennas clearance, network coverage and equipment space are being met. This site will remedy the service deficiency and will provide adequate service for customers in the search area. Therefore. The subject site is the best-suited, feasible, available location to provide seamless, reliable coverage within their search area. VI. Staff Recommendations - The Planning Department recommends for the above reasons, information provided during and thereafter the Public hearing and the below information would satisfy the requirements of both site plan and special exception consideration by the Planning Board. 1. The applicant submitted revised plans and responses to the letter dated May 12th 2010 and Walter Coopers last comments dated May 7th 2010, a. An RF Safety Plan has been submitted to address Walter coopers concerns b. A third supplement RF affidavit was submitted that address and clarifies concerns proposed by Walter Cooper regarding the fact that T-mobile is experiencing deficient service. The Affidavit concludes that information provided during the public hearing and supplemental information supports the need for T-mobile service @ this location and it will substantially cover the gap in area. c. Proposed acoustical system proposed around the building: i. Mitigation to reduce sound levels to 45dba is for a 10-foot high solid barder as recommended by William F Collins R.A. for the applicant. ii. I discussed the issue of noise mitigation with both the applicant and Mike verity to be sure what they were proposing would meet zoning. Originally, this was a wall like structure. As per the revised proposal, an enclosure having a roof 10 feet in height would be considered an accessory structure meeting setbacks and as proposed is satisfactory. Mike Verity on May 17, 2010 said that what he reviewed was adequate and that he would certify the plans when appropriate. d. The applicant submitted photo simulation of the structure. 2. It is recommended that the Board schedule the application for a final determination for the next available Public headng. RADIO FREQUENCY SAFETY PLAN CONTROLLING EXPOSURE TO RE FIELDS Exposure problems involving members of the general public are normally less common than to "other personnel" where exposure problems may exist. Those "other personnel" such as applicant's employees,.building employees and first responders (i.e., Fire Personnel) may be placed near the vicinity of the Facility's antennas due to the fact that such workers would be more likely to be in areas having close proximity to an RF Source. If potential exposure levels are much higher than the ambient levels but still in compliance or if personnel, due to necessities, are placed in front of an antenna, there are several options available for ensuring compliance with the FCC RF guidelines. For this Facility, these areas could be within the interior of the steeple and the exterior of the steeple, within a distance of one foot fi.om the antenna surface, as well as the Roof Peak, and, should in this case, be considered "restricted" areas. Restricting access is usually the simplest means of controlling exposure to areas where high RF levels may be present. Methods of doing this include fencing and posting signs in such areas or locking out unauthorized persons in areas, such as steeples and rooftop locations, where this is practical. If the area of concern is properly marked by appropriate warning signs, fencing or the erection of other permanent barriers may not be necessary. For this Facility, signage, including the sign in figure "A", will be installed just below the access door to the interior of the steeple as well as to the exterior steeple area of the building roof peak. A lock will also be installed to the access door to the steeple interior. FIGURE A In the event that access to the transmitting front surfaces of the wireless communications facility antennas in any and all azimuths is necessary, signs are required instructing personnel (not trained in RF safety techniques), in locating main switches required to shut down the wireless operating system. Instructions kept with this safety plan will include detailed emergency procedures for shutting down the wireless communications Facility during a major event such as a fire or natural disaster. Such instructions also will be located adjacent to the main power switch to the Facility cabinets and any other feasible location within, or exterior to, the building. PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application of T-Mobile Northeast LLC, f/ka/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc., as Applicant, and the Presbyterian Church or Society of Cutchogue, as Owner for all necessary permits to construct, operateand maintain a public utility wireless communication facility located at: 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York.known and designated as Suffolk County Property Tax Id. No.: District: 1000, Section: 102, Block: 1, Lot: 12 ("Property") THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL RADIO FREQUENCY AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: MARIANA NIETO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer, employed by T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (hereinafter "T-Mobile"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in wireless telephone network coverage and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna cell sites to remedy service deficiencies in wireless communications coverage. 2. I submit this Third Supplemental RF Affidavit in response to the correspondence from Walter A. Cooper, the Town of Southold's ("Town") radio frequency consultant, dated May 7, 2010 (the "Correspondence"), at paragraph 2. In addition, I submit this affidavit in support of T-Mobile's special exception and site plan application (the "Application") to the Town Planning Board with respect to the construction of a public utility wireless communication facility (the "Communication Facility"), designed to remedy a deficiency in wireless telephone network coverage that exists in the Cutchogue area, at the Property. 3. Mr. Cooper appears to have two sets of questions in paragraph 2 of the Correspondence. As was the case in my review of prior correspondence from Mr. Cooper in my Second Supplemental RF Affidavit, each of the items referenced in paragraph 2 the Correspondence has been addressed during the course of the hearing process before the Planning Board. 4. Regarding Mr. Cooper's first set of questions, which concerns the coverage gap, Mr. Cooper sets forth the following assessment: "In the [Second Supplemental RF Affidavit], Ms. Nieto variously states that '... the signal required in and around the site [is] -76 dBm...' that '... T-Mobile's required signal strength is at -76 dBm, which is an in-building coverage level...' that 'the primary objective for T-Mobile within the Cutchogue area is to supply both in-vehicle coverage along Main Road, as well as in-building coverage within the surrounding structures' and that '[the] location [will] provide seamless, ubiquitous.., coverage...' These statements seem vague, confusing and self-contradictory." 5. On the contrary, all of the above statements are consistent with one another. As Mr. Cooper is no doubt aware,~ding coverage is a str~onger signal in order to penetrate the material which comprises a building structure. Therefore, T-Mobile's -76 dBm in-building signal will serve not only the surrounding buildings, but also the in-vehicle needs along the roadways within the vicinity. The in-building signal would be inclusive of both in-building and in-vehicle coverage, because an in-building signal will not only penetrate into buildings, but also less onerous vehicle shells, which will permit signals into passing vehicles. 6. Mr. Cooper next asks "Are only some buildings and some roads in the gap area to be covered?" Although this question does not appear to directly relate to his previous thought, it was addressed previously during the course of the Planning Board process. As is the case with any facility, external factors will dictate the amount of coverage that will be provided to the surrounding area. Such limitations as tree cover and topography will limit the extent of signal coverage provided by a wireless facility. Therefore, as testified at the public hearing on January I1, 2010, the Communication Facility will substantially cover the gap in the area. This will not be 100% coverage, but it will vastly improve the current lack of coverage for T-Mobile within the area. 7. Next, Mr. Cooper asks "If so, which ones and where? Which buildings are the 'surrounding' buildings?" In answer to this, we direct Mr. Cooper to the prior propagation maps previously prepared and submitted as part of the Application to depict the existing and proposed in-building coverage. On these maps are depicted the anticipated coverage of the Communication Facility, shown in green. The buildings located in the green area are anticipated to receive the in-building level signal. Those buildings outside the green area will not. 8. Next, Mr. Cooper asks "How far along Main Road is in-vehicle coverage required?" Generally, in-vehicle coverage is required along the entirety of Main Road. However, in connection with the area around the proposed site, during the January 11, 2010, public hearing, I defined the in-vehicle coverage gap along Main Road as 2.50 miles in length. As can be seen on the previously supplied propagation maps, this length of "white space" extends from approximately Skunk Lane to the east of the site to Road D to the west of the Property. -2- 9. Mr. Cooper continues by asking "Is coverage not required on other roads as well?" Certainly T-Mobile is seeking to provide in-vehicle coverage along other roads. However, because it is by far the busiest roadway near the Property, the primary in-vehicle objective is to have coverage along Main Road. 10. Mr. Cooper next asks, "What is 'seamless, ubiquitous coverage?' How is it provided if only the 'surrounding' buildings and some roads are covered?" To answer the first question, this language is noted in the Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999, under Congress' findings, wherein they note that "the construction and operation of seamless, ubiquitous, and reliable wireless telecommunications systems promote public safety and provide immediate and critical communications links among members of the public; emergency medical service providers and emergency dispatch providers; public safety, fire service and law enforcement officials; transportation officials, and hospital emergency and trauma care facilities." (Emphasis added). It has been defined in various ways by different parties. Nonetheless, as for the second question, it should be noted that the goal of "seamless, ubiquitous coverage" is ongoing, and will be achieved by the proposed communication Facility in concert with the other existing sites within the area. 11. Mr. Cooper next explores a new subset of questions by writing, "For that matter, the gap that the applicant seeks to remedy has still not been clearly defined. Is it the area depicted on the initial propagation maps as lacking coverage at -76 dBm (in-building) or the area shown as lacking coverage at -84 dBm (in-vehicle) or is it some combination? Are there two gap areas - one for vehicles and one for buildings?" As discussed in paragraph 8, above, at the January 11, 2010, hearing, I provided a comprehensive listing and description of the gaps at the in-building and in-vehicle leyels, as well as the on-street level (which is required under the Town Code). They are as follows: In-Building Gap: In-Vehicle Gap: On-Street Gap: North-South = 2.14 miles, East-West = - 2.72 miles North-South = 2.12 miles, East-West = 2.63 miles North-South = 1.31 miles, East-West = ~ 2.42 miles. 12. In addition, as noted on various occasions throughout this process, T-Mobile builds its network to the -76 dBm level, but there are gaps also at the other two primary levels of in-vehicle and on-street. Evidence of gaps at all three levels further supports the fact that T- Mobile is experiencing a deficiency in coverage in and around the Property. 13. As for Mr. Cooper's second main set of questions, he asks for further clarification on the type of equipment used in assessing T-Mobile's need in the subject area. Specifically, Mr. Cooper asks: "What computer model was used? How was the model calibrated for local 3 conditions? Were drive tests conducted? What other information was used to confirm the conclusions provide by the model? Did she conduct in-building signal strength measurements? Were customer complaint logs and lost and dropped call statistics from adjacent sites consulted? What did they show?" 14. In answer to the above questions, I used the Aircom International computer model, which is also named Enterprise Network Planning, or ASSET. The model was calibrated by Aircom Intemational based on widely accepted industry standard methods. Drive tests were conducted, and confirmed the gap in coverage within the area. I did not conduct in-building signal strength measurements. However, no measurements were necessary because the drive test results conclusively showed that there was a clear deficiency. Customer complaint logs and dropped call statistics were consulted, and confirmed the gap in coverage. 15. In summary, Mr. Cooper states in the Correspondence that his "goal has been to assist the Town in tmderstanding the applicant's needs and whether or not the proposed facility will meet those needs in the least obtrusive manner in accordance with the Town's zoning regulations." T-Mobile believes the above information, supplementing the prior materials and testimony provided to the Planning Board, is sufficient under the Town Code to demonstrate T- Mobile's need for coverage in the area around the Property, and that it is the least obtrusive alternative to fulfill said need in the area. -4- CONCLUSION 16. Therefore, as stated previously, based on the foregoing data, maps and analysis, it is my professional opinion that: (i) there exists a serious deficiency in T-Mobile's wireless communications coverage within the Cutchogue search area; (ii) the alternative sites, which are located within one-half mile of the Property, are also suitable to remedy T-Mobile's service deficiency within the Cutchogue search area but are unavailable for leasing; and (iii) thus this Communication Facility is the best suited, feasible, available location to provide seamless, ubiquitous, reliable coverage within the Cutchogue search area. 17. Based on the foregoing, we believe all of Mr. Cooper's questions have been answered, and that the Communication Facility should be favorably considered by the Planning Board and T-Mobile's requested Application should be granted. T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC By: ~et Name: o Title: Radio Frequency Engineer Sw_ojp_ to before me this ~ c~lXXday of May, 2010 \ \ \ \ ~: .T...Mobile, ~mc s~ IM Northeast LLC GD ~o su~mt ~. T~ P~SBYTE~AN ~ oeu; ~. ay HT~ C~CH OF CUTCHOG~ ~: ~,~ ~*= ~*~ ~~ C~UE, NY 11935 U U U U (~. SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" LJ U U U U (~ NORTHEAST El FVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" i ~ 0%7199 205/13/10 -,,,,, -T...Mobile.,. n xoNs ~ IM Northeast LLC GD 3~o0 SUHRI$~ IlWt. Ta~ PRESBYTERIAN L113807C ~CA~: CR~kT ~IV[R, NY 117.~9 CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE ~w~o~ ......................... 27245 MAIN RD SK-2 ~,~.~ ~?^: ~,~, ~-.,m,,n~'~co~,~n~ CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 (~ SOUTI-IEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (~ NO--EST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" ~ ~ .... ~ i ~,,,,_~ ~R ~ C~NG ~ W~ C~ I ~ ,.. ...~ .... ......... . 07-71~ ~ .Mobile l ~.~, = s ~ON A~C ~ , ~,~,o ;~ Northeast LLC OD ~ ~..s~ ~. T~ P~SBYTE~AN LU38~C ~ ~a; ~, ~ ~;~5 C~CH OF C~CHOG~ ~ ~" A R C U I T E C T ~ LLP ............ 27245 ~N -T-. -Mobile- Northeast LLC Site Number: LI-13-807 Iqew 3. Existing view of the equipment compound from the rear parking lot, looking East. Project.4ddress: I ~' = ' 27245 Main Road I ~I)M$~ CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. Cutchogue, NY 11935 ..~ 65 ~.~pova,ev~a Mahwah, NJ 07430 -T-- -Mobile- Northeast LLC Site Number: L1-13-807 Flew 3a. Proposed view of the equipment compound from the rear parking lot, looking East. z - . 27245 Main Road ]DW~ (:~ONSOLTING SERVICES, INC. Cutchoguc, NY 11935 ,,~ 65Mahwah,Ramapo V, IleyhO 07430R°ad .H ACOUSTICAL CONSULTING, INC. Phone 212-246-6727 Fax 212-246.3142 May 3, 2010 Ms. Gina .lacobellis William F. Collins Architects, LLP 10-1 Technology Drive Setauket, NY 11733 Re: T-Mobile - Presbyterian Church - Site No L~-13-807-C (07-7199) Cutchogue, NY 3RHAC Job #2614 Dear Ms..]acobellis: In response to your request, We have reviewed the filing plans dated 2/22/10, and have analyzed the equipment acousldcal data for the cellular communication equipment for site No. LI 13-807-C proposed for a location behind The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue located at 27245 Main Road, in Cutchogue, NY. The sound-emitting telephone equipment cabinets, hat~ery backup cabinet, and UNITS cabinet will be located on grade. The nearest church-owned residential property line is approximately 15 feet from the proposed equipment. The property line of the next nearest property to the northwest is approximately 74 feat from the proposed equipment. At your request, we evaluated the existing nighttime sound levels at the site for comparison with the Town of Southold's Code requirement (section 280-70 I (5)) of 45 dB(A) at a distance of 10 feet from the equipment fencing. We also analyzed potential mitigative treatments to reduce the equipment sound levels to meet the requirement of 45 dB(A). This report summarizes our findings, comments, and recommendations. A. Existing Ambient Sound Levels We conducted an acoustical survey of sound levels on Apdl 28m and April 29~ for a continuous period of approximately 19 hours. Monitedng began on 4/28/10 at approximately 1:45pm and ended on 4/29/10 at approximately 9:30am. The w~ather conditions were dry and windy for the beginning and end of the measurements. However, to reduce the effect of wind on the microphone, the monitoring equipment was placed on the north east of the side of the one-story addition to the church. While the measurement location was closer and more exposed to the Route 25, the centdbution from traffic was negligible dudng the nighttime hours when traffic noise was sporadic. To verify this, the writer visited the site from approximately 12:00am to 12:30am. Further, wind dudng the overnight hours was diminished, and hence had no effect on these readings. The monitoring indicated that from approximately 12:30am to 3:30am, the average ambient noise level at the measurement location remained at approximately 45 dB(A). These readings were averaged over 1/2 hour pedods to factor out higher transient sounds from nearby activities such as car pass-by events. B. Town of Southold Code The Town of Southold Code section 280-70 1 (5), requires that noise from base equipment, including any backup generater, measures less than 45dB(A) at a distance of 10 feet from the equipment shelter, or in this case, the fenced enclosure. This requirement correlates well with the measured ambient noise levels near this site. William F. Collins Architects, LLP Re: T-Mobile - Presbyterian Church - Site No LZ-13-807q: (07-7199) May 3, 2010 Page 2 Analysis of Proposed Sound Emitting Equipment The proposed facility consists of a total of four sound emitting cabinets. This group includes two sound-emitting telephone equipment cabinets (Nortel GSM BTS S18020), one battery backup cabinet (Magnetek I~PE5566), and one UMTS cabinet (Ericsson RB5 3106). The equipment cabinets were evaluated for their sound level at a distance of 10 feet from the containment fence. A plan showing the equipment locations and distances to the nearest property lines is provided in Figure 1, Appendix A. The drawings currently show that equipment cabinets will be surrounded by a 6 ft. high vinyl fence. 'The following basic sound data has been provided for each type of equipment, Each Telephone equipment cabinet (Nortel GSM BTS S18020) ...... 70 dB(A) at 3 feet 13attery backup cabinet (Magnetek MPE5566) .................. 69 dB(A) at 3 feet UMTS cabinet (Ericsson RBS 3106) ................. 85 dB(A) sound power rating In the calculations, we accounted only for the sound attenuation due to the distance of each cabinet to the property line and for the 6 It high vinyl fence. Uttle or no sound attenuation is afforded by the new shrubbery. The fence, if made solid, would provide approximately 5 dB(A) barrier attenuation. The expected equipment sound levels at a distance of 10 feet from the fence enclosure are expected to he as follows: (2) Telephone Equipment Cabinets ................................ 55 dB(A) Battery Backup Cabinet ........................................ 54 dB(A) UNTS Cabinet ............................................... 60 dB(A) All equipment together ......................................... 62 dB(A) The ur4Ts cabinet is dearly the dominant sound source within the equipment group and controls the combined equipment sound level. The combined sound level of all equipment at 10 feet from the fence will approximate 62 dB(A), or 17 dB(A) above the code required level of 45 dB(A). Recommendations for Mitigation To reduce equipment sound levels to 45 dB(A), we would recommend the following treatments. Provide a 10 ft. high solid barrier fence around the equipment. The fence shall have no gaps and shall extend to the ground.' A 4" thick baffler/absorber panel system such as United McGill Soundscreen shall be used, and that has a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) of 40 and a Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) of 1.09. Figure 2, in Appendix A, shows the extent of the recommended tteatment. Appendix B includes manufacturer's literature for the proposed baffler enclosure panels. Reorient the equipment cabinets so that the face emitting the highest acoustic energy faces southwest, away from the nearest property line. William F. Collins Architects, LLP Re: T-Nobile - Presbyterian Church - Site No L1-13-807-C (07-7199) Nay 3, 2010 Page 3 With the above treatments implemented, the noise level is expected to meet the Town's Code requirement of ~,5 dB(A) at a distance of 10 feet from the barrier enclosure as specified above. Consequently, the equipment noise at the nearest property line is expected to approximate the nighttime ambient sound levels at both the property line of the church-owned property and the nearest non-church property line to the northwest, and should therefore not be objectionable. We trust the above is clear, However, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 3ohn R. Hauenstein President Attachments Project: Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Special Exception & Site Plan application for a Wireless Communication Facility. Preparer: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Date: October 05, 2009 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: SCTMN#: Street Location: Hamlet: Type of Site Plan: Property Owner: Applicant: Agent: Plan Prepared By: Date of Map: Submission Date: T-Mobile Northeast, LLC at Cutchogue Presbyterian Chumh 109-2-17.1 27245 Main Road Cutchogue New Cutchogue Presbyterian Church Amato & Assoc Gregory Alverez Nell Alexander MacDonald R.A. 10/08/08, last revised 12/16/08 08/21/09 II. Description of Site Plan Proiect Proposed Construction Type: Zoning District: Notice of Disapproval states: Call of Meeting: existing site R-40 Any new proposed wireless facility located in a zone other than LI, LIO, B, HB, MI, or Mil requires Special Exception approval as well as site plan approval from the Planning Board. The applicant requests a Special Exception & Site Plan approval for a public utility wireless communication facility. The request is for co-location of antenna interior mounted within an existing church steeple, including a related storage equipment area screened from view. As part of the application, the applicant proposes to remove and replace a portion of an existing church steeple to match the existing church building on a 0.91-acre site located in the R-40 Zoning District. Application for T-mobile Northeast LL C, p.2 III. Site Analysis SEQRA CLASSIFICATION - The subject property is an existing site 39,725 sq. ft. parcel located in the R-40 zoning district improved with a church building with attached steeple 65 feet high from average grade and associated parking area. The proposed wireless facility will consist of (8) panel antennas concealed within the existing church steeple having portions removed and replaced with a replicated version created in RF (radio frequency) stealth material. Also there will be a 247 sq. foot equipment storage area located at the northern corner of the church having (7) equipment cabinets. This area is proposed to be enclosed with a 9' foot chain link fence with privacy slats and (14) arborvitae 6'foot in height surrounding the area. IV: Permits and/or Review Required From Other A.qencies: Carrier licensed by FCC - Submitted · Power density analysis- Prepared and signed by Louis (3. Cornacchia stating the proposed is below the Max Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits established by the FCC. - The applicant is in compliance with the FCC MPE of 1,000 General public or "unrestricted environment "standard set by the (NYSDOH). · Power density will need to be corroborated by an independent RF engineer. · Structural Inspection Report, submitted by Nicholas J. Deflice, P.E. for the Steel dunnage platform adequate. · Lease agreement- Submitted · Due Diligence Affidavit- Submitted. Site meets criteria for location, height, antenna clearance, network coverage and equipment space were meet. This site will remedy the service deficiency and will provide adequate service for customers in the search area. · Co-location Affidavit- submitted. No objection to third party collocation provided no interference with T-mobile, and can obtain a lease agreement with the property owner proper approvals. · FAA -Shall comply with applicable airport and/or airspace hazard and/or obstruction regulations- Applicant Submitted a TOWAIR determination that states that the structure does not require registration. · Cutchogue Fire District · Building Inspector Certification · Drainage review from Town Engineer · LVVRP review for consistency · ARC Application for T. mobile Northeast LLC, p.3 V: Special Exception Considerations: 1. Construction of proposed facility is a public necessity: Copies of an RF analysis with site propagation map and supporting evidence of inadequate service were submitted for review. The applicant has made substantial effort to co-locate with existing wireless facilities, or has made substantial effort to locate on municipally-owned land or structures, or with in existing structures: A Co-location Affidavit was submitted that states that T-mobile Northeast has no objection to third party co-location provided there will be no interference with T-mobile, and such party can obtain a lease agreement with the property owner proper approvals. Additionally a Due Diligence Affidavit was submitted for review. There are compelling reasons, which make it more feasible to construct the proposed facilities rather than alternatives: The applicant has submitted a due diligence affidavit stating that the subject parcel site meets criteria for location, height, antennas clearance, network coverage and equipment space were meet. This site will remedy the service deficiency and will provide adequate service for customers in the search area. It appears that this co-location will cause essentially no visible change in the appearance of the building or surrounding area. VI. Staff Recommendations - The Planning Department recommends for the Planning Board to accept the application for review and refer the application out to the above agencies. Staff recommends that the Planning Board to consider the following: 1. Distribute application materials to Planning Board members for review. 2. Request for the applicant to submit a 500-foot radius showing zoning and land uses for determinations to be made regarding visibility and proximity to residences and landmarks and if facility is designed and situated to be compatible with nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties. 3. Request inventory maps and search ring studies as mentioned in the August 21, 2009 submission would be provided to the Town under a separate cover. Application for T. mobile Northeast LLC, p.4 4. Recommend referring the application to an independent consultant hired by the Town. 5. Request payment by the applicant for a technical consultant fee (to be determined). V: Materials to aid in review Aerial view of property, Visual Study, RFE evaluation, Propagation Maps TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION ~%:~- SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: A~st 2o /__/20o9 Site Plan Name: Presbyter/aa Church Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000 - lo2 Other SCTM#'s: Street Address: 272z~5 tlain Road Distance to nearest intersection: .135 Feet Hamlet: Catcho~ue Type of Site Plan: New Amended If Amended, last approval date: __/__/__ Residential SECTION B: Owner/A,qent Contact Information P/ease list name, mailing address and phone number for each contact: Property Owner ~e Presbyterian Church or Societ7 o£ Cutchogue Street 272~,5 Natn Road City Cutcho~ue State ~y Zip ~1.935 Home Telephone (631) 73~-sz~sz~ Other Applicant Oa~ipobt Ce~etmications, lac. Street 3500 Suarise Htgh~ayp Suite D203 City Great River State ~ Home Telephone Other __ Zip 1].739 Applicant's Agent or Representative Grego~7 R. Alvarez, ]Esq. Contact Person(s)* ~,~ato & Associates. P.C. Street 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 City Garden City State ~ Zip zz530 Office Telephone (516) 227-6363 Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to this person. 3/19/2008 1 SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: x New x Property total acreage or square fuotage: Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: __Modificatioa of Existing Strncture Change of use ac./sq, fi. ac./sq, ft. Agricultural Is there an existing or proposed Sale of l)evclopment Rights oa tile property? Yes __ Il'yes, explain: No Property Zoning District(s): R-~O Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: __/ / Is an application to the Southold Town Zoniug Board of Appeals reqaired? Yes __ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes x No If yes, attach a copy o£the application packet. x No Show all uses proposed and exisling. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate sqaare lbotage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: Church List all proposed property uses: gxintin~ use and applicant seeks to construct, operate and maintain a public utility wireless c~unication facility at the subject property as depicted on the site plans/construction ~r~win~s submitted herewith and incorporated herein. umcr accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: % Proposed lot coverage: Gross floor area of existing structure(s): sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): Parking Space Data: No change to existing conditions. # of existing spaces: # of' proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Yes No__ Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: % Proposed landscape coverage:. Waterfront Data' f . Ils this property within 500" ora wetland area? Yes __ No If yes explain: I, the andersigned, certil~ that all the above information is true. O~[IPOIN~ O]I"~[INICA.TIOIqS, INC. Signature of Preparer: ~%%r~ ~) ~ Date: N~: ~se Viv~o Title~l g~er 3/19/2008 TO: FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Cutchogue Presbyterian Church C/O Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 3500 Sunrise Hwy., Ste. D203 Great River, NY 11530 DATE: April 16, 2009 Please take notice that your application dated February 25, 2009: For permit to install wireless communication facility: Location of property: 27245 Route 25 Cutchogue, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 109 Block 2_ Lot 17.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Pursuant to Article XVII Section 280-70(E) which states "any new proposed wireless facility located in a zone other than LI, LIO, B, HB, MI or MIl requires Special Exception approval as well as site plan approval from the Planning Board." Authorized Signature CC: file, Planning Board Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. TO: FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Cutchogue Presbyterian Church C/O Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 3500 Sunrise Hwy., Ste. D203 Great River, NY 11530 DATE: April 16, 2009 Please take notice that your application dated February 25, 2009: For permit to install wireless communication facility: Location of property: 27245 Route 25 Cutchogue, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 109 Block 2 Lot 17.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Pursuant to Article XVII Section 280-70(E) which states "any new proposed wireless facility located in a zone other than LI, LIO, B, HB, MI or Mil requires Special Exception approval as well as site plan approval from the Planning Board." Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department.~. CC: file, Planning Board FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: Project Name: Project Address: Suffolk County Tax Map No.:lO00- /"~?' - ,,2 - /~/'Zoning District: Request: ~/~ ~ -~,~-,,,, (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: Initial Determination as to whether site plan is require~.~ )1'~/I - ,.)~-~ 9- SgnatureofBu dng ns~o[, ,~ , ~, l i,,~'~!,l Planning Department (P.D,) Referral: ¢ P.D. Date Received: / / Date of Comment:~/. / _ . D / Comments: ~ Final Determination Date: / / Decision: Signature of Planning Dept. Staff Reviewer Signature of Building Inspector TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 TEL: (631) 765-1802 FAX: (631) 765-9502 www. north fork. net/Southold/ Examined _, 20 Approved __ _, 20____ Disapproved a/c PERMIT NO. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Do you have or need the following, before applying? Board of Health 4 sets of Building Hans Planning Board approval_. Survey Check Seplic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Contact: Mail to:~-~Iato & ~aoctat.~a P.C. 666 Old C~untry Road~ Suite 901 ..... ?~ ........ ' Phone: (516) 227-'6363 Exp~ranon * ~' *-- ~r Bud ng nspector . ~ A~ICATION FOR aVmm~c P~]T ~ ..... "' ~ Date ~m~r ~ 20 INSTRUCTIONS ~7~ application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submiued to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot pl~ showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or are~, and wate~ays. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Pe~it to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in pa~ iht any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Ce~ificate of Occupancy. C Eve~ building permit shall expire if the work authorized h~ not commenced within 12 months a~er the date of issuance or hm not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning ~endments or other regulations affecting the prope~, have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the ~it/bt an addition six months. Therea~er, a new pe~it shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department/hr the issuance ora Building Pe~it pu~uant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordin~ces or Regulations, Ibr the construction of buildings, additions, or aherafions or 13r removal or demolition ~ herein described. The applicant agrees lo comply with' ali applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, ~d regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessa~ inspections~ ~~, ~. (Signature ofapplic~t or name, ifa ~: ~tse VtvJno ~tle: ~1 Es~te & 3~ ~ RJ~yp ~ D203~ ~t ~verp (Mailing addrcs~ of applicam) State whether applicam is owncr~ lessee, a~cnt, architcc(, engineer, ~cneral contractor, clcctriciam plumber or builder Name of owner of premises ~ Pre~byeerta~ ~r~ch or ~let~ of Cntehn~,~ (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is.~c., co~oration, signature of duly authorized officer (.Name a~d title of corporate ~'~ficer) Name: Den/se Viv/uo Title: Real Estate & Z~nin~ Hanager Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. I. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 27245 ~n Road House Number Street County Tax Map No. 1000 Section Subdivision (Name) Cutcbogu% !~/ 12.935 Hamlet bor "~r '~ 17_1., Filed Map No. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupan~:y of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy ~..~ ' ~ */~-~ **~ a u~blic .~tl~ty ~[retess cmmmuntcation £aciX~ty as depicted b. Intended use and ,'~e~r,,nnncv,/~w-L*'~,'~ tree ~ r- "'"~ ~ on ~ site plans attached heFeto and im.u,q~-t Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration X Repair Removal x Demolition Other Work - (Description) Estimated Cost If dwelling, number of dwelling units If garage, number of cars Fee (To be paid on filing this application) Number of dwelling units on each floor.___~!a See site plums If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. hereto aad lnco~,rated See si~ pl~ at~*~ ~W ~ ~a~ ~' ~. Dimensions of existing structures, i~any: Front Rear ~- Depth _ Height ~ ~t Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front ~ ~ Rear ~ Depth ~ c~ Height Number~f Stories ala g. Dimensions of entire new construction: FrontRearD~pth Height ~5, Number of Stories ~/a 9. Size of lot: Front Rear 10. Date of Purchase mto~ t~, 1~ Name of Former Owner 1 I. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law. ordinance or regulation? YES~ NO x 13. Will lot be m-graded? YES. NO x Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES~ NO 1 27~5 ~ P~ 14. ~amcs of Ownc~ m pmm~scs ox ~amc of Architect ~ddrcss Phone ~o Address Phone No. Name of Contractor 15 a. Is this prope~y within 100 feei of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES__NO x * IF YES. SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES ~ D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUI~D. b. Is this prope~y within 300 feet of a tidal wetland.'? * YES NO x * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide su~ey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to prope~y lines. At~ ~ffto ~ ~c~at~ ~- ~ 7. if elevation at any point on prope~ is at I 0 feet or below, must provide ~opographical data o~ su~ey. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: cOUNTY OF Suffolk ) t~,,~,,e viv~no ; on ~f of O~fl~ofmt being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named. (S)lte is the Lessee (Contractor. Agent. Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application: that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief: and that the work will be performed in lhe manner set forth in the application filed therewith. 20 Og/ Notary. Public Signature of Appfican Diana Ma~ Ruhe Quatifed In Suffolk ~unty No. 01RU81M197 SITE LEASE WITH OPTION THIS SITE LEASE WITH OPTION 0his ~ [s by nad bet~s~ The Pr~nn C~u.,~..h Or Society ofCutehouge , a(n) Religious Corporation (#Landlord") and Omnipotnt Con~unieallo~ Inc~ a Dolawaro delwnro corporation (a) 'In con~doratio~ of lt~ impatient of, ho "Option ]Fee") by Tenant to the terms md oondlflons set ~h he~-4n (tim ~)l~lOn"). Tlm Olin stroll b~ 1~ an inllM mm ofl , oommenolnt on the Eff~ttvc Date (ns defined below) (tho #O1~o~ Pedod~ Tim Ol~on P~-Iod m~ b~ e0~o~d by Tmmnt ft~ m 0~ wr~en notke t~ Landlord and pregnant of the sum of to the md of lhe Option Potiod. ) ("Addlti°n~ Optl°~ Fe°~) at any I~° Pri°r (b) Dt~ tiro Ol~lon Period and an~ e0a~mioa fl~,f, and during tim Initial T~m and any Renownl Term (a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ boZow) of thk ~ L~lo~d I~ ~o ~ w~h I~ h ~nln~ nf Tonm~'s e0q~nso, all I[~n'~s and pen~s m' a~llod~'~!~ roqulrod 2. Tm~. ThelnlltaltmnoflhisLmsod~ll~ ~mnn~noln~onthodatoofe~'~sooftheOpflon(the"Commm~ement 1:~"), nnd t~rmlnatin~ at nddnl~ht on lira la~ ds~ of the Initial t~m (th~ .,initial Tmn.,), (b) Du~ the Initial Tmn and any RmowM Te~n~ monthly Rmt shnll bo n4justed ef~otlve o~ ~m annive~nry of ~ ~t 5. ~ ThePmnlsmn~'l~medbyTemnt forth~tnmsmisdonandn~plionofrlgllocommunieatloostgnals~ for~ consUucfioo, installation, operation, nm,lnmanoe, rqJlr, rmoval or rephieem~t of,~lated facilities, including, without limitation, tow~ and bose, antennas, microwave dh~lm, equlpmmt ~ and/or cabin,s and related a~tvlti~. 6. ~ Tm~ntshallno~uselhoFremlse~tnan~w~,whlehlnte~n~wlththousoofthePrope~byLandlo~or ~ lieensee~ of Landloed with Hght~ in tho Ptoge~ prior in time to Ter~nt's (subject to Te~nt's ri~s under this Lea~ includin~ without limitation, non-lntm~mee). of the Property in Similarly. Landlord siMI not us~ nor ~ Landlord permit its lessees, licenses, employees, invitees or agents to use, ~my portion any way which Interfe~s with the operations of Tenant. Such Inted~rence slmll be deemed a material Ix'each by the interfering I puffy, who shall, upon wrl~ notice ~ ~be ot~-, be re~o~sible fo~ t~mimtin~ ~dd Inted~. la tbe ~v~ ~ny sush ~ do~s not right, in addition to any olhor rights ti~ it ma~ Imve a~ hw o~ in ~ulty, to bd~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~is ~ immediately upon written notio~ 7. Improvements; Utilities; (0 Tennnt dudl ~ 24-hour, 7-d~.~,,v~k ~ to tho Premim~ nt MI times duttn~ the lnMd Te~n of this Lcese and any Raz~'wal Tmn, at no cbrp to Temnt. (8) I _-,~t_ _k2rd _dui!! malntah and rejmb. MI ames8 ruMws~s from tho nearest imblio rcedwu~y to tim Prembes h & manner nffickmt to allow ~veMeubr and pedestrian a~ess at all flm~ st h sol~ e~peme, e~cept b an~ dmm~ to such roedv~ys camod ~ T~ (u) upo~ wrJtMn notice by ]Landl~d [f Te~mnt fMb to curo ~ a,~u~qt ~ pn~aunt of nmounts due uador ~ ~ ~|n (b) immedla~ly upon wilton no~ee by Tenant if Te~mnt notifies l~lo~d of any unac.,;~ible rceulls of any T~ ~ lo Tenant's installation of tim Anl~na Fa~tlltl~ o~ l~e Pmnlses, ar If Truant does not obtsin, nm~ or ~ ~ ot cancels any license (including. wltilout I~ on FCC Ilc~ue). permit or 0ny Oo.~nM1 ,~o.d IM~e~g~ to ihe Imlfdhtioa mld/~ ~ ~ ~ F~li~ ~ (u) ulmn' * wrll~n notice by Tenant If Temnt dztmnlnes that ~ Propet~y or lh~ Antemm FnetlRice are in~l~ol~lsl~ or u~ foe Tennnt's ol~nstions for ~cenomle o~ ~eehnologi~ reasons; (d) imm,Mlately uIMn written no~e by Temnt ff the Prendsos or the Antama Faf~litie~ are destmyod or dmna~d so as in Tenant's reaMmble judsment to subetnntially and Mvensdy a~ct tho effective use of the Antrum, Fndlltks. in sush evenk all rights and obllsatious of tbe Pllvfi~ slmll e~se u of tbe ~ of ~ datm~ or d~mol/otk md T~mt ~lmll be wffilflM to tbe reimbm,s~m~nt of any Rent ~s~id by Tcemt. If Temme ejects to contbnm this Leme, th~ MI Rent shall nba~e until the Premises md/oe ~he Antenna Fadlitiez nm re~ored to the condition existing (e) at tho time titie to Ihe Prol~aXy trmsfers to n cendenmlmt authority pmmmt to a taking of all or u poflion of tbe Property suflkient in Tenant's determln~ion to r~nder I~ Pvmfls~ unsuitable for Tennnt's use. Landlord nmi Tenant si'mil en~ be entitled to pursue flleir own sel~rate 2 awards with respect to such inking. Snle of all or I~t of tho Propm~ to a purehnser with the po~a~' of eminent domain in lbo fa~ of the ox~cise of the power shall be trealed ~s a taking by eondemnation. (a) T,~ will n~inMIn ~ ~ LtaMlllv Insurnom in amounls of ,,~ (e) SubJect ~o ~he ~n'ty Jrdmunce waives sut f'oflh h mbo~:~lou I I Co), Landl~d and Tenet each a~ee M Indenmlfy and hold hannlem the otlm' party fl'om and apinst an~ md ali ehin~ ~ ~ snd expens~ Jnebfl~ reuon&le a~mey fise~ to b ~ ~ by ~ ~vlng rls~ to nn obllplion to Indenm~ Ihe olh~ I~ nnd dm Ind~rmlti~d i~'s ~nt~g R Ih~ r~ht M ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~t of~ 12. Nmicet Allnmiees. r~lumts, d~,.~4sandolher~om~mlealtonsd~ll beln~,.l~anda~dl~setiv~ tt~rdopositin the U.S. null, Geflifld md pomqo pekt, ~ upon fcc(dpt if persomlly delivered or seat by nmtt-~ ddlver/via u nalionnl[y r~counized providin$ swirlon notice Io Ihe othe~ pon'y, T.l~)blle USA, 12~20 SE 3~ Street Bell~'ue, WA 98O06 Alto: PCS Lea~ Admlnimmot With a copy to: Omdpolnt C~[c~tlom, Inc 4 Sylvan Why P~ NJ O7054 Aim: Le~e Admlni~lr~on Manager With a copy Io: The Pred~yterian Church OF Society of Cutchou~e P,O. Box 964 Cutcho~ue, NY 11935 And with a eouv to: The Preobymhn Churdl Or SociW/ofCutehouge P.O. Box 964 Cu~e. NY 1193~ 13. QUjetEfllovfim~t. TMenndAulhndtv. AsoftheBffectivoDateandotall time~durinsthe lnithlTmmandanyRmewnlTmnsof~bis Lense, Landlord oovenams and wnrnmts to Tenn~t that (i) LmdioM has iMI d~ power and au~ to ~.emto ~ ~ ~s ~ 01) Truant and width will not Interl~o with Tmant's rishts to or ufe ortho ~ (Hi) e~ecutkm and perflMnmnee of tbb ~ ~1 ~ ~~ htw~ o~lhmm~ covenan~ or lbo provisions of sm~ mottp~ hnme~ m' olh~ a~feemm~t bhd~ng tm Lmdlord~ and Ov) Temmt's qu~ ~ ~ liabillt~ (eoll~, N~dm~ Jndudlnb but m lineal M, dnnmSn~ _ _~,~_._. etpenns. ~ penaMak ~nu, Iom~s, judsments and reasom~ afl,rosy b that lira b~ ms~ mfl~r ~ h~r d~ m It~ mdsmm~ of my 14 _,,~om ~es ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ of o~ ntbe Ooin the indmmit~'s m:~.Mos on Ihe ProperS. l.~l_b~l_ nsre~ to deh~d, indemnJ~' and bom Teoam ~ h ~ ~ ~ removal ~f restorstion wo~ m~ed by m~ ~ovemnmtal smbod~. Tlds Seeflon 14 shall nn'lw the tm~b-tt~ o~ e~lmtoo of lids Le~t prior M/tten ocnsmt of Tenant whJ~ ms~ be wl~.~ h,dd In Tmmnt*s sole dJscrel/tm. Upon as~ Indudin~ mdt as~ where Temm's consmt is required and reoolved, Landlord draft be rdleved of MI iJab/IMes md ddlSations ~ ~ T~ ~1 ~ m~y ~ ~ ~ tM$ Leme (and at reprds the Tenant and tim AnMnna FMlitl~), smd m~ ~lateully mslSn this M (~ ~ ~ ~ T~ ~ ~ ~ 16. Suczessors~ 3~dsL~mdt~/~s~me~sbiii;~dhe~n~im~nmwi~ht~ml~nd~nd~llbebindin~up~n~ndh~m fl~n time to ~t~__. whether before or a/~' a deflmlt undm' this Lease. in Temntts mtYor Seined Park's sole ~m ~ w~ ~'$ cop. sent 18. ~t~.tt~neout (a) The pr~allln~ Imfly in any IM~atlon srlsfng hemm~ shall be entitled to ret~ from ~e other party of its rc~omble attorneys' fee~ and ~ourt em~ inel.dh.* ~ gray. (c) Landlord agre~ ~o cooima~ with T~mt in ~xeoufln$ any documants necessary ~o protect Tcoant's rights l~ or usa of the Premise~ A M~morandum of Lea~ in subs~matiaily ~1~ folm attached ~ ~ Exhibi~ C may be re~rded in place of this Lco~ by Temnt (d) In ~ ev~t ~he Property is ~umb~ by e moflga~e or deed of trust, Landlord qrees, upon r~qum~ of Tcoant, to obtain and furnish to Tenant a non-distorbance and attornme~t a~anmant for eam~ such mort~ or deed oftruM, in at fo~m reasonably accol~able to Tenant. (e) Tenant may obtain Utie insurance on its inte~st in tho Pre~ses. Landlol*d a~ to ~ mt~h dcoon~lts as the title company my rcquirc in connection ~he~ewtth. (0 Tiffs Lmtse shail b~ ~v*t~'ued in aoro~ with fue laws of the state in wlde~ ti~ Property is I ~o ~.~______; wifuout re~ard to the conflicts of law p~lnoiplan ofanch state. of this Leane will be deemed waived by el~bw party unless ~.,~'~ty waived fu wrMn~ by tho waiving pefl~,. No waiver shall be implied by delay or (I) This Lan~ m~' b~ m~:t~ted in any nangom* of co~mteq~afls, each of width stroll be demand an odaionl, but all of which to,ether shail con~*_,* a sfuSlo lantmm~t (k) If eithor pasty Ls IqWasanted by any Iwe&er or any OdmF Iceain8 a~ent, anch tuefly is reqxmsJble for ail ~ou fl~e or olher pes, naont to anch esem, and oSreas to ~ and hold tho ofuer pasty Imnnleas ~rom MI claims by anch T~*ker or anemone chdming furonwh such bt,okra.. By: - , . Printed Name: Title: Dat~: Tg~IANT.' By: Printed Name, Wa~'n~ Leonk T-~obDe Legal Ap~ovai EXHIBIT A Legal D~criptio~ The Property is le~ily described m ~llOws: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application of OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., as Applicant and The Presbyterian Church or Society Cutchogue, as Owner, for necessary approvals to construct, operate and maintain a wireless utility communication facility at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York (the "Property") SCTM: District: 1000, Section: 102, Block: t, Lot: 12 COLLOCATION AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 280-70(D)(3) OF THE TOWN CODE STATE OF t~e~ ¥~rk ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF Suffolk ) Denise Vivino , being duly sworn, depose and say: I am a ~al Estate Manager ("Omnipoint"), the applicant herein; employed or retained by Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 2. I make and complete this affidavit under the penalty of perjury and swear to the truth thereof; Omnipoint proposes to install eight (8) antennas within a steeple (the "Steeple") to be constructed on the Property, together with related equipment cabinets and all other appurtenances, structures, improvements, equipment, devices, cables, conduits and wires related thereto, as set forth in the site plans and application submitted herewith. The site plans bear the name and seal of a New York State licensed engineer. Omnipoint hereby states, in accordance with Section 280-70(D)(3) of the Town Code, that Omnipoint will be locating its antennas within the Steeple, as shown on the site plans/construction drawings submitted herewith. Omnipoint is not opposed to other wireless communication providers utilizing the Steeple and surrounding grounds to install wireless public utility communication antennas and any associated equipment, as long as the location of the antennas and equipment do not interfere with Omnipoint's operation. Omnipoint's willingness to collocate at the current site is also subject to the ability of such third party to obtain any required lease with the Property owner to locate its antennas and equipment and to obtain the proper Federal, State, and local approvals, including but not limited to, zoning and building approvals from the Town of Southold. OMNIPO1NT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Sworn to before me this day of ~0¥ ~-,'~ 1~- , 200/ Notary Public Nota public, State New No, 02WE6163139 Qua ifiefi in Queens CounW Commission By: ~ Name: Ren~e VivXno Title: Real Estte TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD WIRELESS FACILITY SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION Application Name (use same name as Site Plan Application Name): Application Date: A,~st 20 / /2~9 Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000 Other SCTM#'s: Street Address: Hamlet: Checklist of application materials required to be submitted (see special Exception Application Requirements Handout or §280-74 D. of the Southold Town Code for details) x One copy of the building permit application materials x Complete site plan application submission x One copy of the deed or lease agreement for the use of the property x Analysis of site location alternatives x Effort to co-locate documentation (if this is not a co-location) x Propagation maps showing existing facilities and servia, ,i~;~.e.~e~A., x Evidence supporting existence of inadequate service Special Exception Application Fee form updated 5/4/2009 PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application of Omnipoint Communications, Inc., as Applicant, and The Presbyterian Church or Society of Cutehogue, as Owner for all necessary permits to construct, operate and maintain a public utility wireless DUE DILIGENCE communication facility located at: 27245 Main ~.~ ~ AFFIDAVIT Road, Cutchogue, New York known and designated as Suffolk County ~,~ ._.~ ............. '~ _ ~,~- Property Tax Id. No.: District: 1000, 1Section: 102, Block: 1, Lot: 12 .................................... X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Jacob M. George, being duly sworn, deposes and say~ 1. I am a Site Acquisition Zoning Specialist employed or retained by Omnip~int Communications, Inc. COmnipoint") to, among other things, investigate potential locations for public utility wireless communication facilities. 2. I submit this affidavit pursuant to Article XVII of the Town of Southold's zoning code (the "Wireless Ordinance"), and in support of Omnipoint's application for a special exception (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") in order to construct, operate and maintain a Communication Facility at the Property. The Communication Facility is designed to remedy a significant service deficiency currently being experienced in Omnipoint's wireless telephone network coverage within the Cutchogue area (the "Search Area"). 3. My responsibilities as a Site Acquisition Zoning Specialist for Omnipoint include investigating potential locations for Communication Facilities based upon criteria provided to me by Omnipoint's Radio Frequency Engineering Department, including: (a) the location of other Communication Facilities; and (b) Omnipoint's existing coverage in the area. (See also, Affidavit by ~a~ott~ ~lqc[m~a~" of c'~at'Oo'~--[ C_o~~'~dio engineer retained by Omnipoint, sworn to the j__z/_~d~y of ./~ood~20040_.). frequency 4. Several factors are used to determine if a potential site is a suitable location for a Communication Facility, including the location, height and wireless antenna clearance for the wireless communication antennas. In addition, another consideration is whether there is enough room to accommodate Omnipoint's equipment at a potential Communication Facility site. 5. I reviewed all documents, notes, correspondence, etc., contained in Omnipoint's files with respect to the proposed Communication Facility to be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York (the "Property"), and the alternative sites located in the Search Area. As such, I am intimately familiar with the facts and circumstances regarding the same. 6. Based upon the foregoing and my experience as a Site Acquisition Zoning Specialist, it is respectfully submitted that a full and complete investigation was conducted of any towers or any usable antenna support structures located within a ~A mile radius of the center of the Search Area ("Potential Sites"). 7. These Potential Sites were rejected for the following reasons: Existinn hole at Cutcho~ue Fire Department, 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue - The Fire Department was contacted on several occasions and was ultimately abandoned due to a lack of landlord interest in leasing the facility to Omnipoim Communications Inc. Existino oole at orooertv owned by New York Telephone Company, 31755 Main Road, Cutchoguc - This pole is unavailable because it contains two large dish antennas used by Verizon for its own operation and a proposal by its sister company, Vcrizon Wireless, to remove the antennas and replace same with cellular panel antennas has been pending since 2006 with no resolution. 8. As such, the aforementioned Potential Sites were rejected as unsuitable locations for a wireless communication facility due to one or more of the following reasons: (1) the respective property owner(s) and Omnipoint could not agree to business terms in connection with a lease agreement; (2) there was not sufficient space available to accommodate Omnipoint's Communication Facility; (3) the subject Property provided a less intrusive location for a wireless communication facility; or (4) due to rodin frequency engineering reasons. 9. In connection with its investigation of the foregoing Potential Sites, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," please find correspondence and associated certified receipts and tracking 2 information from Omnipoint's Site Acquisition Consultant to the applicable above-referenced property owners, indicating a lack of landlord interest from the contacted owners. 10. As a result, the proposed site, located on the Property, is the only site within the Search Area where: (1) the owner was willing to lease space to Omnipoim; (2) the owner and Omnipoint were able to agree to business terms in connection with a lease for a portion of the property; and (3) Omnipoint's criteria for location, height, wireless antenna clearance, network coverage and equipment space were met. In addition, the proposed site would remedy the service deficiency and would provide adequate and reliable network coverage for Omnipoint customers in the Search Area. 11. Pursuant to § 280-67(A) of the Wireless Ordinance, it is the express purpose of the Wireless Ordinance to minimize the visual and environmental impacts of communication facilities. In addition, according to § 280-67(A)(1) of the Wireless Ordinance, the first goal of the Wireless Ordinance is to site communication facilities within or on existing buildings and structures where the antennas are invisible (or nearly so) from public and residential vantage points. It is my opinion, that locating the antennas within the church steeple on the Properly will fulfill these goals of the Wireless Ordinance. 12. Based on the foregoing, I respectfully request that the Planning Board grant Omnipoint's Application in all respects. Sworn to before me this the ]q ~l~y ofJqLI 0~ i,~ t 2009 Notary Public Omnipoint Communications, Inc. By:~f~/~. //~ D~ana Uatie Ruhe Ouali~ed In Sufl~k Court/ No. 0~RU~54~97 My Commission Expires 10/23/20_~ EXHIBIT "A' Alternative Site Correspondence PLANNING BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application of Omnipoint Communications, Inc., as Applicant, and The Presbyterian Church or Society of Cutchogue, as Owner for all necessary permits to construct, operateand maintain a public utility wireless communication facility located at: 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York known and designated as Suffolk County Property Tax Id. No.: District: 1000, Section: 102, Block: 1, Lot: 12 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: RADIO FREQUENCY AFFIDAVIT PAWAN MADAHAR, being duly sworn, deposes a~d says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer, employed by Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (hereinafter "Omnipoint"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in wireless telephone network coverage and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna cell sites to remedy service deficiencies in wireless communications coverage. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of Omnipoint's special exception application (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board with respect to the construction of a public utility wireless communication facility (the "Communication Facility"), designed to remedy a deficiency in wireless telephone network coverage that exists in the Cutchogue area. 3. The proposed Communication Facility will be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, known and designated as District 1000, Section 102, Block 1, Lot 12 (the "Site"). The proposed Communication Facility will consist of, among other things: (a) Four (4) sectors of public utility wireless communication antennas, two (2) antennas per sector (for a total of eight (8) antennas) mounted entirely within an RF compatible concealment material church steeple assembly, to match the existing steeple in all respects; (b) Seven (7) equipment cabinets mounted on galvanized steel equipment dunnage, located near the northeast comer of the existing church; (c)One (1) global positioning satellite ("GPS") antenna; and (d)All other appurtenances, structures, improvements, fencing, equipment, devices, cables, conduits and wires related thereto, as more fully set forth in the site plans submitted herewith. 5. Omnipoint is a public utility under the laws of the State of New York and it holds a license from the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to serve the public within the Town. Omnipoint's FCC license requires that it provide wireless telephone service within the geographic boundaries of the New York metropolitan area, which includes the Town. The regulatory mandate for this franchise is that Omnipoint provide a quality of service consistent with FCC requirements. 6. Mobile telephony is a method of communication by radio consisting of mobile units, either mounted in vehicles or hand-held, that transmit to and receive signals from fixed base cell sites. The base cell site connects the mobile telephone to the landline telephone network by sending signals within a small geographic area. The cell sites are designed to cover a small geographic area because mobile telephony utilizes low power and the frequencies licensed by the FCC are, generally, "line of sight." In addition, factors such as terrain, foliage and existing buildings can seriously impair/inhibit the signal strength, making the coverage irregular and unreliable. Therefore, it is necessary to locate base cell sites at predetermined locations and heights in order to provide a seamless and reliable grade of service to the public. 7. Seamless, reliable coverage is the ability of a customer to move from one cell to an adjacent cell, through a process called "hand-off", while carrying a call on the network. As a customer making a call in the vicinity of a cell site moves about and, as he or she begins to move out of the range of the cell site, the coverage becomes weaker. As the customer travels, the call is transferred ("handed-off') to the adjacent cell site, if that cell site is within range. 8. To establish the necessary distribution of cell sites and to help ensure that coverage is seamless and reliable, cell sites are strategically located throughout the licensed coverage area based upon, among other things, network efficiency, topography of the land and the location of other cell sites. 9. When a significant service deficiency exists, the ability for effective communication is diminished and service can seriously deteriorate in that region. Customers experience the inability to make calls, continue calls, and receive calls and may experience inaudible conversation ("muting"). 10. The location and height of the antennas are determined by some or all of the following factors: 2 ii. iii. iv. Terrain and land cover features in the region; Location of candidate properties; Location of existing cell sites in the network; and Use of sophisticated computer software programs, utilizing physical principals, which allow the radio frequency engineer to forecast the anticipated coverage at a given height and location. 11. The computer software programs utilize ground elevation data from maps published by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey. Ground cover is determined mostly by physical inspection and aerial photographs of the locality. 12. The coverage information described above is analyzed to determine the minimum height required for the cell site. 13. If the antennas are placed at an elevation which is lower than the minimum needed height, coverage is reduced and additional cell sites will be required to alleviate the service deficiency. NEED FOR THE SITE 14. There is a serious service deficiency in Omnipoint's wireless telephone coverage in the Town. A deficiency in coverage is evidenced by the inability to adequately transmit or receive calls, as detailed above. 15. The deficiency in coverage that exists in the Town prevents Omnipoint from providing uniform, reliable, wireless coverage to public and private users, including, but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance, and emergency response services. 16. The deficiency in wireless service within the Town is ongoing and pervasive. I base this conclusion on personal knowledge gained through my use of computer modeling, which RF engineers employ to identify deficiencies in wireless coverage. 17. Three (3) computer generated maps, showing the deficiency in wireless coverage that exists in the Town at the three signal strength depictions based on Omnipoint's Design Criteria (-76 dBm, -84 dBm and -91 dBm), is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A." These deficiency maps take into account the operation of the neighboring cell sites operated by Omnipoint. See attachment "Marc Cosgrove Affidavit" for details on Omnipoint Design Criteria. 18. A "gap map" overlaid on an "existing coverage" background propagation map demonstrating the area within which Omnipoint's existing service is not adequate is attached as EXHIBIT "B.' 3 THE SITE IS IDEALLY LOCATED 19. My analysis confirms that the Site will provide reliable coverage for the area in the Town in which Omnipoint is experiencing a service deficiency. 20. Three additional computer generated maps, demonstrating that most of the deficiency area is eliminated when the Site is "turned on", at the three signal strength depicted, are attached hereto as EXHIBIT "C." 21. Omnipoint operates other wireless communications sites in the vicinity of the Town and surrounding area. The location of these existing cell sites dictate where new cell sites may be located when there is a need to remedy a deficiency in coverage. 23. The communications coverage deficiency exists in the Town despite the operation of Omnipoint's surrounding cell sites. Mobile telephone technology is designed to be used at a uniform "power output" such that a site can communicate with a mobile unit and a mobile unit has enough power to communicate with the base site. Omnipoint cannot simply "turn up" the power of the surrounding cell sites to provide coverage in the deficiency area. Increasing the power of the surrounding cell sites would create an unbalanced system where the site may be able to communicate with the mobile unit but the mobile unit does not have the power to communicate with any site. The mobile units use a battery and are limited in their power output so a mobile unit cannot "turn up" the power to maintain the balance. In addition, Omnipoint's licensed frequencies are, generally, "line of sight" and increasing the power would not overcome signal blockage due to obstacles, such as hills, valleys, existing buildings and trees. Finally, the FCC limits the power output of both the cell sites and the mobile telephones. Thus, limitations in technology, topography and FCC regulations result in a finite number of alternative cell sites that may be considered as possible candidates to remedy a deficiency in coverage. ALTERNATIVE SITES 24. As required by Town code, our office has also reviewed and evaluated several potential alternative sites surrounding the Site for the placement of the Communication Facility (the "Alternative Sites"). 25. I have analyzed these Alternative Sites in order to determine the feasibility of the same to remedy the service deficiency within the Cutchogue search area, that the proposed Communication Facility is designed to address. 4 ALTERNATIVE SITES EVALUATED 26. There is an existing pole on property owned by the Cutchogue Fire Depa~hiient, located at 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue. Three computer generated maps depicting the expected wireless coverage for Omnipoint communication facility at this location, at the three signal strength depicted, is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "D." These maps also depict the location of the proposed Site and its expected propagation, and take into account the operation of the neighboring cell sites operated by Omnipoint. Based upon my analysis, I have determined that this pole is also suitable for the installation of Omnipoint's communication facility. However, according to the affidavit of the Site Acquisition Specialist, the Cutchogue Fire Department is not a~ailable for leasing. 27. There is an existing pole on a property owned by New York Telephone Company, located at 31755 Main Road, Cutchogue. Three computer generated maps depicting the expected wireless coverage for an Omnipoint communication facility at this location, at the three signal strength depicted, is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "E." These maps also depict the location of the proposed Site and its expected propagation, and take into account the operation of the neighboring cell sites operated by Omnipoint. Based upon my analysis, I have determined that this pole is also suitable for the installation of Omnipoint's communication facility. However, according to the affidavit of the Site Acquisition Specialist, this pole contains two large existing dish antennas and is unavailable for immediate leasing at this time. CONCLUSION 28. Based on the foregoing data, maps and analysis, it is my professional opinion that: (i) there exists a serious deficiency in Omnipoint's wireless communications coverage within the Cutchogue search area; (ii) the Alternative Sites, which are located within one-half mile of the Site, are also suitable to remedy Omnipoint's service deficiency within the Cutchogue search area but are unavailable for leasing; (iii) thus this Site is the best suited, feasible, available location to provide seamless, ubiquitous, reliable coverage within the Cutchogue search area. 29. Based on the foregoing, the Site should be favorably considered by the Planning Board and Omnipoint's requested Application should be granted. OMNIP.~OINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Name: Pawan Madahar Title: Radio Frequency Engineer Swom to before me mis ~ [~ dayof /01Ct(~, 2009 Notary Pu~ Glorfa Mercy GaV#anet Quallfi ' A6053921 'ecl In New York County ^ Comml~lon Explre~ January ;~,~...O I O 6 EXHIBIT "A" THREE COMPUTER GENERATED MAPS SHOWING DEFICIENCY · Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Reliable Coverage Map: In-Building Existing Coverage (-76dBm) Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Reliable Coverage Map: In-Vehicle Existing Coverage (-84dBm) Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Proposed Site · Existing Sites Reliable Coverage Map: On-Street Existing Coverage (-91dBm) Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles EXHIBIT "B" GAP MAP OVERLAID ON AN EXISTING COVERAGE PROPAGATION MAP EXHIBIT "C" THREE COMPUTER GENERATED MAPS DEMONSTRATING DEFICIENCY ELIMINATION · Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Reliable Coverage s Ln Map: In-Building Existing and Proposed Coverage (-76dBm) Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: 1 inch = 0.7 miles · Proposed Site · Existing Sites Reliable Coverage Map: In-Vehicle Existing and Proposed Coverage (-84dBm) Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Proposed Site · Existing Sites Reliable Coverage Map: On-Street Existing and Proposed Coverage (-91dBm) Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles EXHIBIT "D" THREE COMPUTER GENERATED MAPS DEPICTING WIRELESS COVERAGE FOR A COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT THE CUTCHOUGE FIRE DEPARTMENT, 260 NEW SUFFOLK ROAD, CUTCHOUGE · Cutchogue Fire Department Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Reliable Coverage Map: In-Building Existing and Proposed Coverage (-76 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location @ 85 ft Site Name: Cutchogue Fire Department 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0,7 miles · Cutchogue Fire Department Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Reliable Coverage Map: In-Vehicle Existing and Proposed Coverage (-84 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location ~ 85 ft Site Name: Cutchogue Fire Department 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles Cutchogue Fire Department Proposed Site Existing Sites Reliable Coverage Map: On-Street Existing and Proposed Coverage (-91 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location ~ 85 ft Site Name: Cutchogue Fire Department 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles EXHIBIT "E" THREE COMPUTER GENERATED MAPS DEPICTING WIRELESS COVERAGE FOR A COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT PROPERTY OWNED BY NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, 31775 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE · Verizon Pole Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Reliable Coverage Map: In-Building Existing and Proposed Coverage (-76 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location ~ 55 ft Site Name: Verizon Pole 31755 Main Road, Southold NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Verizon Pole Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Reliable Coverage Map: In-Vehicle Existing and Proposed Coverage (-84 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location @ 55 ft Site Name: Verizon Pole 31755 Main Road, Southold NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0,7 miles Verizon Pole Proposed Site Existing Sites Reliable Coverage Map: On-Street Existing and Proposed Coverage (-91 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location (~ 55 ft Site Name: Verizon Pole 31755 Main Road, Southold NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Existing Sites Proposed Site Search Area Map: Search Ring Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Radio Station Authorization Page I of 2 169 LICENSEE NAME: T-MObtle License LLC DAN MENSER T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC 12920 SE 3BTH STREET' BELLEVUE WA 98006 FCC Registration Number (FRN) 0001565449 Call Sign [ File Number WQGB263 [ 0002769270 Radio Service Grant Date Effective Date t 1-29-2006 Expiration Date t 1-29-2021 Print Date Market Number Channel Block sub~Market Designator Market Name: New York. NY-Nd/Nassau-Suffolk 1st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date 3rd Build-out Date 4th Build-out Date SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR WAIVERS/CONDITIONS Th~s authorization ts conditioned upon the licensee, prtor to Initiating operations from any base or Conditions: Pursuant to Section $09(h) of the Communications Act of 1934. as amended, 47 U.S.C, Section $09(h). this I~cense is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any tight in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any othes manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the r ght granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise.transferred in vloloficn of the Communications Act of 1934. us amended. See 47 U.S.C. Sect on ;31D(d). 111is Iiaense is sub, eof in terms to the right of use or control conferred by ~;ection 706 of the Commun cat °ns Act o! 1934. as amended. See 47 U.S.C. Section 606, To view the geographic areas associated with the license, go to the Universal Licensing System (ULB) homepage at hffp:/Iwlreless.fcc.gov/uls and seleCt "License Search". FollOw the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601 - MB February 2006 Call Sign Page 2 of 2 File Number PHnt Date 0~X)2769270 11-30-2006 Special Conditions or Waivers/Conditions Deutsche Telekom AG, VotceStream Wireless Corporation, VolceStPeam Wireless Holding Corporation and the Department of dustJce (DOd) and the Federal Bureau o f Investigation (FBI), which addresses national security, law enforcement, and public safety Issues of the FBI and the DOd regarding the authority granted by this license. Nothing in the Agreement is intended to limit any obligation (c)(1) and the FCC's implementing regulations. The Agreement is published at VotceStream-DT Order, IB Docket No. 00-187, FCC 01=142, 16 FCC Red 9779, 9853 (2001). FCC 601 · MB Nicholas J. DeFelice, P.E, Consulting Engineer 22 Hills Park Lane, Smithtown, NY 11787 Telephone: (631) 361-7543 Fax: (631) 656-6320 December 1 2008 Mr Neil MacDonald, AIA William F. Collins. Architects 10-1 Technology Drive Setauket, NY 11733 Re: ~)mnipoint - LI-13-807-C THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr~ MacDonald. Pursuant to your request, I have designed the steel dunnage platform to support the proposed equipment. The proposed equipment platform will support (5) pieces of equipment weighing approximately 12,000 pounds. The equipment layout and steel sizes are shown on the construction documents. The steel dunnage platform was designed according to the live load. dead load. ice toad and wind load requirements set forth in Chapter 16 of Building Code of blew York State It ~s my professional opinion that the dunnage platform can safely sustain the loads from the equipment and is in compliance with the loading criteria in the Building Code of New York State If you have any questions please call TOWAIR Search Results Page 1 of 1 TOWAIR Determination Results *** NOTICE *** TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine if it must coordinate its structure with the FAA. TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence, and further investigation may be necessary to determine if FAA coordination is appropriate. DETERMINATION Results Structure does not require registration. The structure meets the §.10-meter (20-foot) Rule criteria. Your Specifications NAD83 Coordinates Latitude Longitude Measurements (Meters) Overall Structure Height (AGE) Support Structure Height (AGL) Site Elevation (AI~ISL) Structure Type BANT - Building with an antenna 41-00-31.0 north 072-29-14.0 west 19.8 19.8 6.1 Tower Construction Notifications Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower. http://wirclcss2, fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/towairResult.jsp?printable 5/18/2009 · I PR~IECT ID NUMBER 617.20 APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION ( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Omnipoint Communications Inc Wireless Facility 3.PROJECT LOCATION: Town of Southold Suffolk County Municipality County 4. PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections, Prominent landmarks etc - or provide map Section 102, Block 1, Lot 12 - 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue. The subject parcel fronts north side of Main Road between Highland Road and Griffin Street. 5. is PROPOSED ACTION: [~ New [~ Expansion ~]Modification/alteration SEQR 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: The proposed action is the installation of a wireless communications facility inside the steeple atop an existing building. The existing steeple would be replaced with a prefabricated structure created to aesthetically match the current design. The antenna facility would consist of eight (8) panel antennas distributed into four (4) sectors consisting of two (2) panel antennas each to be located within the interior cavity of the steeple structure. Supporting equipment would locate at ground level along the northwest corner of the building. Required equipment would consist of three (3) equipment cabinets, three (3) booster cabinets, and one (1) battery cabinet that would be placed upon a + 324 square foot galvanized steel platform surrounded by an eleven (11) foot chain link fence. Approximately ten (10) arborvitaes are proposed to surround the equipment platform. The facility would require po~m3a,d;te!et;)hone,ser~ices~o'l~e~§%C)p]i~d by 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially :1:324 sq. ft Ultimately/ :1:324 sq. £t. iTM I 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONs?; ~, '--'ViZ_lYe, II No n no, deacribebr e,y 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? Chooseasmanyasapp~)' [7]Residential r~]lndustrial r~commercial [-'-]Agriculture I--]Park/Forest/Open Space ~=]Other (describe) House of Worship 1o. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) r~']Yes [-"] No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: i i Building permit, Special Exception Permit-Zoning Bd of Appeals, Site Plan-Planning Bd, Antenna Review Committee , GML239M 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Referral r~Yes [~]No If yes. list agency name and permit / approval: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? E~es [~]No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Spo~4'~.~TM~~,/~. ~/)(~...~_mni i tComm , tions, Inc. Date: September 20, 200~ Signature ( DMS Consultin~ Services, Inc. If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment LI13807C PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.47 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. [~Yes [~No B. WILLACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEWASPROVIDEDFORUNLISTEDACTIONSIN6NYCRR, PART617.67 IfNo, anegative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. j'~ Yes [~No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: I C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: I C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species. Explain briefly: I C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land oi o[h~ nai~ral re~0~ ~x~lrain briefl~. t C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related achv~hes hkely to be ~nduced by the proposed achon. Explain briefly: I C6. ng term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C5. Explain briefly: I C7. Other impacts Iincluding changes in use of either quantity cr ~pe of energy? Explain briefly: / D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ~.~I.~oOsNME~..]ALNoAEiA ICEA/? /If)'es, explain briefl)'; E. iS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If)'es explain: PART Ill - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, deterrninewhetherit is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of par~ ii was checked yes, th e determination of significance must evalu ate the potential impact of the proposed action on th e environ mental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed actior WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting thi.~ determination. Name of Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WiLLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REVISED MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: August 21, 2009 Re: Payments Attached are the checks listed below. Payments are for deposit into a deferred account. Fee is for a site plan application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check bate/No. Type ~ T-Mobile Cutchogue Site Plan fee 109-2-17.1 $2,000 8/19/09 - 1551852 T-Mobile Cutchogue special exception application fee 109-2-17.1 $1,000 8/19/09 - 1551853 Encs. LR 271 North Avenue Po~t Box No, 1620 New Rochelle, NY 10802-1620 Phone: 914-§76-6530 Fax:914-576-0576 C 0 R P 0 R A T I O N dba/$cineticso0rporation A ENGINEERING REPORT OCTOBER 21, 2008 PREPARED AND SIGNED BY LOUIS G. CORNACCHIA, B.E.E. PRESIDENT SCINETICS CORP. EVALUATION OF RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS FROM THE PROPOSED OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PCS INSTALLATION WITH ANTENNAS, (SITE~LI-13-807C- THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE) TO BE MOUNTED WITHIN THE STEEPLE OF AN EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING, LOCATED AT SECTION 109, BLOCK 2, LOT 17.1, 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK. 271 North Avenue Post Box No. 1620 New Rochelle, NY 10802 1620 Phone: 914-576-6530 Fax: 914-576-0576 C O R P O R A T I O N dba/scineticscorporation B Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 3500 Sunrise Hwy., Suite D203 Great River, New York 11739 Subject: Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions from the proposed Omnipoint Communications, Inc., PCS Installation with Antennas (Site #LI-13-807C- The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogne), to be mounted within the Steeple of an existing building located at Section 109, Block 2, Lot 17. I, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York. Attn.: Omnipoint Communications, Inc., As per the request of the applicant, Omnipoint Communications, Inc., enclosed please find: An analysis of findings and conclusions prepared by SCINETICS Corporation Engineers on the following: Maximum Power Density of the combined field at the closest point to the proposed Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Facility ("Facility"), Antenna Installation, and at specific radial distances from the Transmitting Antennas, where people can be. Calculated levels compared to allowable EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991/NCRP (47 CFR § 1.1310), Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA and the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) Limits C SUMMARY This report is the result of an extensive study of Electromagnetic Field Intensities (EMF - Power Densities) emitted by the proposed Omnipoint Communications, Inc, Installation, with Antennas (Site #LI-13-807C - The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue), to be mounted within the Steeple of an existing Church Building, located Section 109, Block 2, Lot 17.1, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York. The study incorporates the most conservative considerations to determine practical combined cumulative worst case Power Densities (EMF) resulting from the proposed Omnipoint Communications and GSM/UMTS transmitting antennas the Cutchogue community could theoretically encounter. CONCLUSIONS The Power Densities emitted by the proposed Omnipoint Communications Antenna Installation base station are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The issue of EMF compliance is pre-empted from the municipality regulatory powers beyond the applicants stating that it has examined the emissions in accordance with "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" with analytical adjustments to equations per Richard Tell Associates and Ed Mantiply of the FCC Office of Engineering Technology and that the applicant is in compliance with the FCC/NCRP MPE of 1000 microwatts/cm, sq. General Public or "unrestricted environment" Standard. This Standard is recognized by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that; "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof, may regulate the placement, construction and modification of personal wireless services facilities on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequencies emissions to the extent that such Facilities comply with the Commissions (FCC) Regulations concerning such emissions". This law directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to offer assistance to state and local governments in wireless facilities issues. On August 1, 1996 the FCC adopted portions of the 1991 ANSI/IEEE, and NCRP Maximum permitted exposure (MPE) criteria. The results of this theoretical worst case safety analysis clearly indicate that the EMF emissions contributed by the proposed Omnipoint antenna installation will be far below EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991/NCRP (47 CFR § 1.1310), Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA, and NYSDOH limits. The emissions broadcast from the Omnipoint Class C transmitters [GMSK (FM) Modulation], are in the non-ionizing 1930-1945 MHz frequency band. The EMF levels attributed to the emissions contributed by the PCS Broadcast Systems are well below EMF Standards which in the Scientific consensus based on overwhelming evidence, are well below threshold effects. The derived Standards have added safety limits to the threshold levels. When EMF levels encountered are at or below the Standard, no health effects occur, therefore no cumulative effect is possible regardless of exposure duration. D The theoretical highest combined cumulative emissions from the proposed Omnipoint Communications GSM/UMTS transmitting antennas the Cutchogue c~.~ommunity could be ex~_sg_~d_to~a~[.a~.~n of 16 feet above ground level, would be less than 0.35% of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. This combined cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be emitted would be 285 times below all applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. (See Table IIA-1) Personnel. while within and below the Steeple Interior area or the peak rooftop of the proposed site building, could be exposed to a theoretical maximum combined cumulative EMF level of less than 5.7% of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards resulting from the proposed Omnipoint PCS steeple mounted transmitting antenna Sector. This combined cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be emitted, would 17.5 times below the 100% permitted of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. The general Public. while on the top floor area of the proposed site building, could be exposed to a theoretical maximum combined cumulative EMF level of less than 1.1% of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards below proposed Omnipoint Communications transmitting antennas, at an elevation of 6 feet above the top floor surface. This combined cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be emitted, would be below the 100% permitted of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards by a factor of 90. Typically, the EMF power densities at the top floor level would be 10 to 100 times lower than predicted, due to the attenuating characteristics of roof and building materials which are ignored in this analysis.-("OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997"-page 23). (Note: All future co-locating carriers must co~nplete an FCC Compliance analysis, including the existing carrier Emissions as determined herein, providing combined cumulative EMF emissions impact.) This EMF level and all other levels presented in Table II&IIA are theoretical maximas that could occur only under worst case, assuming conditions such as in phase reflections occurring steady state, all transmitters operating simultaneously and continuously and excluding resistance or attenuating characteristics of construction material used in homes, schools and other similar structures. In reality, actual field measurements continually provides readings of power density levels far lower than the more conservative analytical levels indicated. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, is the applicable Federal Law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of PCS Radio facilities. It is the conclusion of this report, that the proposed Omnipoint application meets the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) present criteria and the FCC criteria as it is effected by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, with respect to environmental considerations of RF emissions. E Further, Mobile PCS Radio Frequency Bands do not interfere with television reception, telephones or radio reception due to the wide separation of the Broadcast Bands as mandated and monitored by the FCC. (See Table I) ANALYSIS This critical analysis* incorporated Radio antenna emission characteristics and included the following assumptions which exceed realistic conditions of operations, but will yield worst case EMF - Power Densities ordinarily not realized and never exceeded. 1. All antennas are located at the lowest elevation indicated in the construction drawing to absorb errors in actual locations and to bring the antenna cluster closer to facilities and citizens than would normally be the case. 2. All antennas will be transmitting continuously, 24 hours a day. 3. All channels will be communicating simultaneously. 4. Power levels emitting from the antennas are increased by a factor of 4.0, to take into account possible in - phase reflections at any point in the community, which is rarely the case, and if so, are never continuous. 5. At all distances greater than 2000 feet, the Power Densities decrease by a factor of four (4) with every doubling of distance. The Wireless Antenna Installation in question is an assembly of low power antennas that emits radio energy at levels 100 to 1000 times below those of Commercial Broadcast Antennas. Given the distances between the antennas studied in this report and the community field points in question, as well as the overall community, the densities of the radio energy are extremely Iow. * Reference Basis for calculations: 1- "Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. OET Bulletin No. 65 -Edition 97-01" 2- Copies of data, sketches, drawings (dated-08/22/07) and specifications submitted by Omnipoint Communications, Inc. are the basis for our studies, calculations and analysis. The attached photograph indicating acceptable EMF emissions from various household appliances provides a further perspective for better understanding the EMF levels encountered in this summary. F Frequency Bands: According to the FCC, microwave (MW) frequencies cover the approximate band from 900 MegaHertz (MHz) to 300 GigaHertz (GHz). One MegaHertz (MHz) is a million cycles and One GigaHertz (GHz) is a billion cycles per second. Table I lists several other communication and interrogation frequencies used in the United States. Clearly, a large fraction of commercial and private telecommunication involves MW Frequencies. TABLE I (Some Frequency Definitions) Type of System FM Radio VHF TV UHF TV Mobile Phone: Cellular/PCS Typical Radar Systems Frequency Interval 88 MHz to 108 MHz 174 MHz to 216 MHz 470 MHz to 806 MHz 806 MHz to 2.0 GHz 200 MHz to 3.0 Ghz G The Principal Features Of The Proposed Installation And The Assumptions Considered In The Analysis Are As Follows; a) The proposed wireless radio antennas will be mounted within the Steeple of an existing Church Building as indicated by the Omnipoint Communications, Inc. drawings. The elevation from the centerline of the proposed antennas to the base of the existiog Building will be 47.3 and 54.3 feet. The closest an individual could approach the proposed Omnipoint PCS transmitting antenna C/L would be 13.0 feet. This assumes a 6 foot tall person, with the distances being measured from the top of that individual's head standing directly below the transmitting antenna panels described within the existing Building Steeple on Bell Cupola platform level. b) The antenna clusters will consist of four (4) Sectors, using two (2) quadpol Directional type antenna (Decibel TMBXX-6516-R2M or equivalent) for proposed carrier Omnipoint in each sector for transmission and receive. The physical arrange~nent of these antennas is illustrated in drawings provided by Omnipoint. (Assumed 0 degree downtilt for all antennas in this analysis.) c) The maximum number of channels that will be assigned to the antenna array, for proposed carrier Omnipoint, in any direction, will not exceed eight (8). The maximum power from the transmitting antennas in each sector, with all eight (8) channels transmitting simultaneously, will not exceed 2000 Watts, ERP (@ 250 watts ERP/channel). The radio transmissions will be at frequencies between 1930 and 1945 MegaHertz. The maximum number of channels that will be assigned to UMTS will not exceed one (1). The maximum power from the transmitting antennas in each sector will not exceed 500 Watts, ERP. The radio transmissions will be at 2.1 GigaHertz. d) The coverage pattern of the voice antenuas will be in four (4) sectors and is considered to transmit circularly, 360 degrees. This will provide a worst case situation, resulting in the maximum possible power deusity. e) It was assumed that the elevation of the Cutchogue community a radius within 2000 feet is equal to the elevation at the base of the Building, with exceptions as noted. f) All field points are at Radial distances indicated from the base of the existing Building where the vertical line of the Transmitting antennas intersect. H POWER DENSITY CALCULATIONS-Analytical Data The Scinetics Engineering Report represents worst case scenarios in determining EMF analysis. One of the considerations is the maximum number of channels which could be transmitted by each of the proposed antennas in each sector. Further, in determining maximum public exposure to EMF emissions, potential close proximity of the antennas must be defined ("near field" region, or "far field" region). The following will examine procedures followed in accordance with FCC OET Bulletin 65- Edition 97-01, with analytical adjustments to equations per Richard Tell and Ed Mantiply of the FCC Office of Engineering Technology. FOR PROPOSED OMNIPOINT PCS ANTENNAS: Andrew Decibel TMBXX-6516-R2M FOR 1930-1950 MHz for PCS ~.-- 984 frequency (MHz) -- 0.51 ft Frequency =1930 MHz "Antennas"-by John D. Kraus, Mcgraw Hill /950 Section 2 R(rqF)= D2= 8.8 feet 4)~ R(FF)=0.6D2 = 21.2 feet D= height of antenna panel=4.25 feet "OET Bulletin No. 65 Edition 97-0i, August 1997" (Pages 27 & 29) Proposed Omnipoint PCS 1930-1950 MHz Antennas: @ P=250 WERP: (R=I foot) per channel The power density in the near field region can be determined as follows: Snf= On axis maximum power density in the near field Snf=lS0 Pnet = 11477 ~tw/cm2@8 channels O YIR'D Pnet =Input power to antenna=51,407,916 ~tw @ 8 channels D=antenna height = 4.25 feet R =distance from C/L to point of interest=l foot ~ =beamwidth= 65© degrees c~ =gain= 15.9 dBd Proposed Omnipoint UMTS 2.1 GHz Antenna: @ P=500 WERP: (R=i foot) per channel The power density in the near field region can be determined as follows: Snf= On axis maximum power density in the near field Snf=180 Pnet = 2869 ~w/cm2@l channel O YIR'D Pnet =Input power to antenna= 12,851,979 ~tw @ 1 channel D=antenna height = 4.25 feet R =distance from C/L to point of interest=l foot O =beamwidth= 650 degrees ct =gain= 15.9 dBd Steeple Interior: Personnel standing to rear of the proposed Omnipoint PCS Steeple mounted transmitting antenna Sectors, the EMF exposure will be primarily from rear of antenna (an emission magnitude resulting from the antenna front panel emission mitigated by the front to back ratio of the antenna in question), therefore: Directly behind proposed Omnpoint PCS transmitting transmitting Antennas within Steeple interior: (@ R= 1 foot) Omnipoint PCS 1930-1945 GSM (8 channels) · Rear of antenna emissions (Snf') determined by antenna model front-to-back ratio =24 dB-power ratio=251; Snf'= Snf/24 dB (11477/251) = 45.7 [xw/cm2 = 4.6% (FCC MPE General Public Standard =1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) Omnipoint PCS 2.1 GHz UMTS (1 chauuel) · Rear of antenna emissions (Snf') determined by antenna model front-to-back ratio =24 dB-power ratio=251; Snf'= Snf/24 dB (2869/251) = 11.4 ~tw/cm2 = 1.._~1% (FCC MPE General Public Standard =I000 microwatts/cm, sq.) Total Combined Cumulative Pct. FCC MPE EMF of a proposed Omnipoint PCS Sector: = 5.7 % Top Floor area- General public, Any point (R) on the Bell Cupola platform area, six (6) feet platform surface below Omnipoint Communications transmitting antenna Sector, in Transition Near Field Region, (Elevation difference H=47.3~-(28+6')_- 13~)_ GSM (@ 8 channels)- Transmitting antennas at an elevation of six feet above the top floor surface, at a distance of R=I foot (Transition Near Field Region), (elevation difference, -13 feet): If off axis distance from antenna C/L (H=R=I3 feet) is greater than height of antenna panel (Decibel model described), then; Snf'= Snf/Rx20 dB = 11477 = 8.8 ~tw/cm2 = 0.88% 1300 (FCC General Public Standard--1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Page 30-Ref[15]) UMTS (@ 1 channel)- Transmitting antennas at an elevation of six feet above the top floor surface, at a distance of R=I foot (Transition Near Field Region), (elevation difference, - 13 feet): If off axis distance from antenna C/L (H=R=I 3 feet) is greater than height of antenna panel (Decibel model described), then; Snp= Snf/Rx20 dB = .2869 = 2.2 l~w/cm2 0.22% 1300 (FCC General Public Standard=1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Page 30-Ref[15]) Combined Cumulative Omnipoint PCS Pct. FCC MPE EMF = 1.10' % *Typically, the EMF power densities at the top floor level would be 10 to 100 times lower than predicted, due to the attenuating characteristics of roof and building materials which are ignored in this analysis.-("OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997"-page 23). K Below transmitting antenna sector, in Threshold Region~ on Rooftop Peak: Far Field Analysis- Elevation difference H=47.3~-(28+6~)= 13': Omnipoint Communications 1930-1945 MHz GSM (8 channels) Where S(ff)=power density EIRP=power output of antenna relative to an isotropic radiator =P(ERP)xl.64 (correctionfactor) R= 22 feet, elev. diff. 13.0 feet F--The ground reflectivity n=number of channels=8 FO=Relative field factor (relative numeric gain) S(ff) = n F EIRP FO = 4.23 microwatts/cm, sq. 4xR2 (FCC MPE General Public Standard=f000 microwatts/cm, sq.) =0.42% Omnipoint Communications 1930-1945 MHz PCS UMTS (1 channel) Where S(ff)=power density ElRP=power output of antenna relative to an isotropic radiator =P(ERP)x 1.64 (correctionfactor) R= 22 feet, elev. diff. 13.0 feet F=The ground reflectivity n=number of channels=l FO=Relative field factor (relative nmneric gain) S(ff) = n F EIRP FO = 1.06 microwatts/cm, sq. 4:cR2 (FCC General Public Standard=1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) =0.11% Combined Cumulative Pct. FCC MPE EMF on top Floor = 0.53%* *Typically, the EMF power densities at the top floor level would be 10 to 100 times lower than predicted, due to the attenuating characteristics of roof and building materials which are ignored in this analysis.-("OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997"-page 23). ! ! [ L TABLE IIA- 1 EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ./PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDS PROPOSED OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ANTENNA INSTALLATION (SITE#LI-13-807C- The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue), 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York Field Point - Any voint iu the commuuity-16.0 feet above ground Antenna System Elevation Power Standard Calculated Percent of Feet WERP FCC/NCRP EMFDensity Standard General Public OMNIPOINT PCS 1930-1945 MHz GSM (Proposed) 47.3/54.3 250 1000 2.81 0.28 OMNIPOINT PCS 2.1 GHz UMTS (Proposed) 47.3/54.25 500 1000 0.70 0.07 Total Percentage Of All Antenna Sources 0.35% EMF emissions contributed by transmitting antennas in differing frequency bands are regulated by MPE Standards for the specific bands iii which the emissions are analyzed. When adding the emissions resulting fi'om transmissions in differing frequency bands, the resulting percentages of the emissions compared to the governing MPE standards are added. Per the FCC, percentages of EMF Density levels of applicable Standards, as specified by the FCC OET BulletinNo. 65 Edition 97.01, are addressed as follows: "Therefore, in mixed or broad band fields, where a number of different frequencies are involved, the contributing of all RF sources must be considered. When different limits are recommended for different frequencies, the fraction of (or percentages) the limit incurred within each frequency interval should be determined, and the sum of all such fractions (or percentages) should not exceed 1.0 (or 100 percent)" (See section 4.1 in Appendix A). M TABLE II EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ.OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PROPOSED SITE: LI-13-807C- THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK Proposed Louver than the 1996 Percentage of the 1996 OMNIPOINT Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points PCS Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE 1930 MHz C95.1-1992 General C95.1-1992 General Antenna Public Exposure Public Exposure Standard (1000) by a (i000) Standard Emissions factor of Point 1 0.62 1600 0.06% R--10'- Base of Building Elev. - 6' Point 2 3.85 259 0.39% R=75'- Existing Church Building Roof Elev. - 34' Point 3 1.00 1000 0.10% R=100'- Nearby Framed Homes Elev. - 16' Point 4 1.09 915 0.11% R=200'- Other Nearby Homes Elev. -16' Point 5 2.81 355 0.28% R=500'- Cutchogue Community EIev. -16' Point 6 1.11 900 0.11% R=1000'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Point 7 0.28 3570 0.03% R--2000'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 or less than 0.01% N TABLE IIA EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SO.OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PROPOSED SITE: LI-13-807C- THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK Proposed Lower than the i996 Percentage of the 1996 OMNIPOINT Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points UMTS Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE 2.1 GHz C95.1-1992 General C95.1-1992 General Antenna Public Exposure Public Exposure Standard (1000) by a (1000) Standard Emissions factor of Point I 0.15 6500 0.01% R-10'- Base of Building Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.96 1000 0.10% R=75'- Existing Church Building Roof Elev. - 34' Point 3 0.25 3660 0.03% R=100'- Nearby Framed Homes Elev.- 16' Point 4 0.27 3660 0.03% R=200'- Other Nearby Homes Elev. -16' Point 5 0.70 1400 0.07% R=500'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.28 3500 0.03% R=1000'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Point 7 0.07 14000 0.01% R-2000'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 or less than 0.01% EMF STANDARDS REVIEW The U.S. Congress adopted "The National Euvironmental Policy Act of 1969" (NEPA) which requires ail govcrument agencies to take into account the potential enviroumental impact of their actions. The agencies must consider whether their actions significantly affect the "the quality of the human euvironment". To implement this mandate, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules covering NEPA in licensing and approving facilities and operations under its jurisdiction. Rules adopted are codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, of tile FCC Rules and Regulations. Facilities or operations specified must provide information assessing the enviroumental effect of their proposal. In the case of RF emissious, the environmental effect would be the relative health risk to people living or working near or at the facility in question. The FCC was required by NEPA to make a determination as to whether the facilities or operations it approves may significantly affect the human environment with regard to the emission of RF radiation. As there was no federal standard for exposure to RF radiation, the FCC chose to rely upon a recognized non-government standard. The FCC selected the "American National Standard Safety Level With Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, "300 KiloHertz (ktlz) to 100 GigaHertz (GHz)" prepared by the American National Staudards Institute (ANSI) in 1982. The protection guides recommeaded by ANSI were the guidelines the FCC had identified for using in evaluating environmental significance with respect to Humau Exposure to RF Radiation. The FCC adopted rules which required preparation of environmental assessment if the particular facility or operation would cause exposure of workers or the general public to levels of radio frequency radiation in excess of the ANSI protection guides. The rule was contained in 47 CFR 1.1307(d). That rule applied to facilities or operations licensed or authorized under tile following parts of the Commission's Rules, 5, 21 (Subpart K), 25, 73, 74 (Subparts A, G, I, and L), and 80. The facilities and operations licensed or authorized under all other parts, subparts or sections of the Commission's Rules are categorically excluded from consideration.. In 1986 the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Sub-Committee SC-53, published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure (NCRP - "Biological effects and exposure criteria for radio frequency electromagnetic fields." NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland). Sub-Committee SC-53 independently retained Radiation Frequency Protection Guidelines (RFPGs) similar to those of the 1982 ANSI Standard but with one notable exception: two tiers appear, one for occupational exposure and one for exposure of the general public. In 1993, the EPA, aware of the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making (In the matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation, August 13, 1993, ET Docket No. 93-62), recommended adoption of the 1996 NCRP Limits as well. In 1990, Sub-Committee IV (SC-IV of C95), formed by the IEEE using rigid selection criteria for their studies and critical reviexvs, recommended the same two tiers but with differences in rational. ANSI soon accepted the recommendations of IEEE Sub-Committee IV and the recommendations were proposed, adopted and termed ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104- February 8, 1996 recommended adoption of portions of the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991/NCRP Standards, and in August of 1996, the FCC did adopt the two tier Standards to be implemented for ail Applications starting September 1, 1997. References for EMR recommended ceilings, data and comments to. radiation sources, radiation hazards and a~ailable reports on studies of household appliances, emitting electromagnetic radiation: Summary of International, Federal, State and Consensus Safety Criteria For.Exposure to Radio. Frequency Energy at Frequencies Used for PCS Communications ! _Organization/Government Agency Exposure Power Population Density ([tW/cm sq.) International -World Occupational 4,875 Health Organization-(EHC 137, 1993) Public 975 International -National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB, 1993) Occupational 10,000 Public 10,000 International -European Prestandard Occupational 4,875 (CENELEC ENV.50166-2, 1995 Public 975 Federal -Federal Communications Commission(follows NCRP-1986) Occupational 5,000 Public 1,000 Consenus Standards American National Standards Iustitute Occupational 5,000 (ANSI C95.1-1982) Public 5,000 ANSI & Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 Occupational 6,500 Public 1,300 National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements (NCRP Report 86,1986) Occupational 5,000 Public 1,000 State Codes New Jersey (NJAC 7:28-42) Public 5,000 Massachusetts (Dept. of Healtb, 105 CMR 122) Public 1,000 New York State Health follows NCRP-86) Public 1,000 l~Jg$ UME NAME: Louis G. Cornacchia STATUS: Married, Four Children EDUCATION: Manhattan College, BEE Iona College, Computer Language Courses ManhattanviIle college, Busiuess La~v Courses PRESENT: Charger Tech Services Ins./SCINETICS Corporation - President Engineering Consultants with Micro wave/Wireless Industry. Mr. Cornacchia has been employed in the Electronics Industry as Electronic Engineer after receiving his BEE fi'om Manhattan College, School of Engineering. Prior to forming Collins Consultants Int'l in 1969 and subsequently Charger Tech Services Inc. in 1974, Mr. Cornacchia was employed by tfazeltinc Electronics Corp. as Engineer, Designing Signal Processor and Radar Display Module l'or The SAGE System, Primary Early Warning System or DEW LINE, the TPS-1-GROUND BASED SEARCII RADAR SYSTEM and AWACS (A6E) RF/Power Systems. Subsequently, Lou was employed by Loral Systems Design Team developing the AN/ALQ58 Recommissance System developed (two man team) the precursor YIG TUNER - [ALR-20] Crystal Scammr covering the full 200 megahertz ~ 12 gigahz Frequency Rm~ge Surveillance System lbr interception of Enemy Navigational Fire Control and Homing Devices for purposes of Identification and Signal Jamming for a specific bomber. Seven years after receiving his degree Mr. Cornacchia was hired as Chief Engineer by Victory Electronic to Develop the Image Intensifier or Night Vision Scopes (Using Star Light) for the Fort Dix Army Command including development of a short circuit proof magnetic amplifier for a tm~k turret driver. At Norden Systems, Mr. Cornacchia developed unique, more aggressive programs incorporating Built-In Test Equipment (BITE) to detect on-coming ch'cult failures of the F111D~E Avionics to increase reliability and was responsible for presentation of same.to Air I~orce procurement Officer and chm~gq of Automatic Test Equipment Mil Specifications to accommodate this innovation. In 1969 Collins Consultants Iht'i, LTD was t'ormed to continue servicing Norden Systems in developing Automatic Test Programs for AIPd3ORNE Computers and Navigational Radar Modules. In 1974 Charger Tech Services, a New York Corporation was formed by Cornacchia (President), with Mr. Robert Harris to service additional companies in both the Defense Industry and the Nuclear and Industrial communities ou an Engineering level. In 1987 SCINETICS was formed by Mr. Cornacchia (President), and application R~r a service mark was filed with the United States Patent Office, m~d granted. As of July 1990, SCINETICS Corporation assumed responsibilities ['or Mobile Cellular and PCS FCC EMF Compliance m~alysis, Intermodulation studies, ILF/EMF Site studies and Site propagation analysis. A partial listing of companies SCINETICS and Charger has been contracted with, employing state of the art Engineers, Technicians and Programmers, are as follows: Port Authority NY/NJ Northrop Gruunman Sirius Satellite Radio ITT Fairchild Camera Div. Syracuse Scientific Corp. Martin Marietta Airborne Instruments Labs Verizon Wireless Loral Electronics Systems New York Telephone Co. Shore Media Inc. IBM Allied Signal - Bendix United Tecln~ologies AT&T Wireless Cingulm' Sprint / Nextel T-Mobile Fox News Mobile Radio Cellular EMF Studies and Testimonies Provided by Scinetics for the following Communities. Case law decisions* favoring Applicant, where SCINET1CS Corp. was mentioned as providing Critical written teclmical support data and Expert testimony in applicant's application process. (Partial Listing): Hillsborough, New Jersey New York City, NY Martlnsville, NJ Readington, NJ* Uniondale, NY Valley Cottage, New York Hastings, New York Little Silver, NJ* Garwood, New Jersey* Armonk, New York Fair Lawn, New Jersey* Bedminster, N J Hazlet, New Jersey* Dix Hills, NY Bayville, NY Jurisdictions in Nassau and Suffolk Counties in which Lou Cornacchia has provided expert testimony and has been qualified as an expert witness: Towns: Hempstead, New York Babylon, New York Riverhead, New York Oyster Bay, New York Islip, New York Southold, New York I-Iuntington, New York Brookhaven, NY Southampton, NY Cities: Glen Cove, New York Long Beach, New York Villages: Cedarhurst, New York Hempstead Village, NY Malverne, New York Munsey Park, New York Valley Stream, New York Northport, New York East Hills, New York Lawrence, New York Matinecock, New York Muttontown, New York Amityville, New York Patchogue, New York Freeport, New York Lynbrook, NY Mineola, NY Rockville Centre, NY Lloyd Harbor, NY Port Je:C[~erson, NY OTHER ACTIVITIES: School Board President - New Rochelle, New York. Finance Campaign Manager - Mayoral Campaign, New Rochelle, New York. SDA District Chairman - Boy Scouts of America, New Rochelle, New York. Chairman- Board of Directors -Reliance Bank, White Plains, New York -USA Bm~k, Portchester, NY Member of Advisory Board of Patriot National Bm~k Stamford, Com~ecticut Member of Board of Directors, Axonyx Corp. Licensed Real Estate Broker State of New York and State of Commcticut VISUAL RESOURCE EVALUATION FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 27245 Main Road Cutchogue, New York Town of Southold Suffolk County Prepared for: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 3500 Sunrise Highway Suite D 203 Great River, New York 11739 Prepared by: DMS Consulting Services, Inc. 65 Ramapo Valley Road Suite 4 Mahwah, New Jersey 07430 June 9, 2009 DMS CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. INTRODUCTION Ornnipoint Communications, Inc. ("Omnipoint") seeks approval for the installation of a public utility wireless communications facility located at The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, within the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The proposed antenna installation would locate within the interior of the existing church steeple. Portions of the steeple would be replicated and replaced with RF compatible materials allowing the systems within to function accordingly. This facility would primarily consist of an antenna installation supported by equipment cabinets. The installation of this facility will not change the location or the original footprint of the existing building. The proposed project is limited to a minor addition within the existing steeple and minor modifications to the exterior with ground based supporting equipment to be located at the northern comer of the church. The proposed action would not alter the existing visual environs as it would locate within the confines of the existing structure. A site visit and windshield analysis was conducted by DMS Consulting Services, Inc. ("DMS Consulting") on June 1, 2009 to assess the subject property, existing conditions of the surrounding area and to determine the possible visibility of the proposed project from within a quarter-mile radius. OCI- L1-13-807 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a wireless communications facility. The primary components of the fa~cility would consist of eight (8~anel antellnag.ax~[.se~en (~_~ equipment cabinets. Drawings prepared by William F. Collins Architects, LLP, with a ~ ~fApril 29, 2009, illustrate that the proposed antennas would be concealed within the confines of the existing chumh steeple. Modifications to the existing steeple would occur in the portions of the steeple that would be removed and replaced with a replicated ve[sio~n_r.~eated i, R F~s!ealth material. The aesthetics of the steeple would remain visually consistent with the pr~difications. The antenna facility would be comprised of four (4) sectors consisting of two (2) panel antennas in each sector, for a total of eight (8) panel antennas all mounted behind the stealth enclosed steeple. The steeple rises to a hgjght of±65'0" Above Grade Level ("AGL"). The antennas would sit at centerline heights of±54'4" and ±47'4" AGL within the enclosure of the steeple. The antennas are positioned to provide service within a specific sector or direction. The directional coverage being provided by this installation is: 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees from north. Each wireless installation requires a small GPS antenna unit. This unit would attach to one of the proposed equipment cabinets within the equipment compound, at ground level. Supporting equipment, consisting of two (2) equipment cabinets, two (2) booster cabinets, one (1) UTMS cabinet, one (1) PPC cabinet and one (1) battery cabinet would sit upon the proposed equipment dtmnage at the northern comer of the chumh within the subject parcel. The ~247 s_ are foot equipment area woul,d, ,b,e enclosed with a chain link fence wi~h priya__cy slats that would have a t~eight o~f~..9._.9~'. The fence would be surrounded with fourteen (1_.4) arborvitae and would have a 4'-0" wide gate for access. Telephone and power demarcations are standard equipment supporting the functions of the facility and would be required for this installation. LAND USE EXIST1NG CONDITIONS The subject parcel is rectangular in shape and lies at the northeast comer of the intersection of Highland Road and NYS Route 25 (Main Road). The existing primary use is a house of worship. Parcel improvements are in harmony with the current use and consist ora l-story church with attached steeple, a generous portion of the lands are an impervious parking area encased within a tree lined buffer with a perimeter of grassy lawn. The mature vegetative umbrella currently provides a natural buffer to the abutting uses. Vehicular access is by way of a circular driveway into the parking field provided by two (2) curb cuts along Highland Road. The church fronts NYS Route 25. A 2 OCI- LI-13-807 concrete sidewalk spans the distance between the parcel frontage and the curbed border of NYS Route 25 which allows for pedestrian access to the structure. The subject property and vicinity lie within the R40 (Residential Low-Density) zoning district. Development within the immediate area are primarily single-family dwellings within a rural suburban setting which includes the historic structures of the Village Green Historic Homes, nestled south of the subject parcel along NYS Route 25. Overall, uses along NYS Route 25 within the radius reviewed are mixed including single-family residential uses, agricultural, house(s) of worship and commercial. The Cutchogue retail services are located to the northeast, inclusive of a library, a deli, and ice cream parlor and a bank. METHODOLOGY FIELD ANALYSIS A site visit and windshield analysis was conducted on June 1, 2009 from approximately 1 I:00AM to 12:30 PM. The weather conditions provided clear skies, sunny, and approximately 60© F. Photographs were taken from viewpoints located in publicly accessible areas. Photo renderings from four (4) different locations are provided to illustrate the visual impact of the proposed installation to the surrounding area. The analysis comprised of a quarter-mile radius from the subject property. VISUAL ANALYSIS An analysis was performed to review and estimate the visual changes that the proposed facility would have on the surrounding area and the subsequent visual impacts the changes may cause. The potential impacts investigated include both visual and non- visual impacts such as those related to municipal utilities, noise and vibrations, land use and transportation. Non-Visual Impacts The drawings indicate that the proposed facility will be unmanned, entirely contained within the improved grounds of the subject parcel. The project does not require any water usage and will not generate sewage, effluent, or trash. The proposed project will not generate vibrations during its normal operation. Because the facility will be unoccupied, there will be no increase in traffic and no need for additional parking spaces. The installation~of the proppsed facility will not alter the use of land adjacent to or in the surr°~eas or require any change in transport'fii~on routes. The existing environs would have no change with the location of this facility. 3 OCI- LI-I 3-807 Ingress and egress to the property will not be affected. Thus, non-visual impacts to the surrounding area are likely to be minimal during construction and negligible during regular operation of the facility. Visual Impacts A visual evaluation was conducted and considered along public rights-of-way only. The church and steeple are an existing condition as well as part of the visual horizon. The proposed modification would--not a ter the o.~ictlng v;~,,~l __e'~tti"~ character of the neigh_borhoad,~but co-exist within it. Where views of the steeple exist, they shall remain so. No alteration to the current level of visibility would occur with the proposed modification. The residential uses to the northwest and southwest are nestled within a thick mature umbrella of both deciduous and evergreen trees. This natural buffer reduces both visual and non-visual impacts from the surrounding environs. Residential uses to the south are blocked by both the mature tree buffers as well as the varying topography. During the field analysis, it was noted that any change would be at ground level and limited to within the subject parcel and along Highland Road within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Even so, the visibility would be minimal due to the proposed fencing and shrubbery. No visibility was noted from residences further down Highland Road. CONCLUSION Visibility of the proposed antenna installation would not exist as it would be fully enclosed within the confines of the steenle. The modification to the steeple would ~ replicate the existing design and color resulting in no visual change to what currently exists. The equipment compound would locate within the boundary of the subject parcel with generally restricted visibility from within the surrounding area. This is essentially due to the location of the compound, the proposed mitigation measures and current development within the subject parcel. Changes to the visual environs would be non- existent for most due to the limited visibility throughout the area of analysis. There are no non-visual impacts associated with the proposed installation, as it would not alter the existing level of noise, vibrations or traffic that currently exists at and within the subject parcel. The proposed facility will be unmanned and does not emit fumes, odors or vibrations. The footprint of the existing structure and layout of the parcel would not change with the proposed alteration, nor would the proposed facility alter the current development of the parcel, neighborhood or future development. 4 OCI- LI- 13-807 PROCESS The photographs were taken with a Samsung Maxima 35mm Camera. A Normal Lens was used for all view points. The lens was set on 50mm auto focus to match the human eye's focal viewfi Kodak Gold 200 print film was used for the negatives for this project. All photos were developed in a 4x6 size print and then scanned into digital format at 300 dpi. The images are directly imported into the Adobe Photoshop CS software program in the scanning process. The equipment was built in a 3D program, Autodesk Discreet 3D Studio Max 9.0 ("3ds Max") in accordance with the Auto Cad file prepared by William F. Collins Architects, LLP. 3ds Max is a modeling program used for architectural, engineering and landscape visualization renderings. Heights and distance are factors of line of sight perspectives that are used in the scaling of the project. A view point is a specific sight line illustrated on a photograph incorporating all objects between two (2) points within a scaled environment. Bringing a rendered model into a "real time" image requires lighting in accordance with the time of day and existing lighting conditions within the photo itself. The photographs are imported into the perspective view port where the build out of the model is aligned with the existing photograph in accordance with the angle taken. The 3ds Max program establishes the visual perspective based on the angle, lens and height used when taking the photograph. Once the model is set into the footprints of the Auto Cad file and aligned with the existing photograph, it is then rendered with the Photometric lighting parameters and exported into Photoshop. This process is required for each individual view point. The Auto Cad drawing allows for the ability to obtain actual measurements of the proposed project within the subject parcel. GIS mapping and aerial views provide the relative distance from the primary control point to the view point. Additional measurements are taken in the field. Lighting and colors are matched and applied to the model. The final rendering is imported into Adobe Photoshop CS3 ("Photoshop") where film grain is matched and final details are added in layers. Photoshop is a painting and finishing program. The blending of these layers will create the final image. The final image is exported to post-production software, Adobe Illustrator CS3, and scaled to page size using its Vector Based scaling engine to ensure zero percent distortion in final print. Text additions and final prints are mn from Illustrator with Pantone Color Matching on all colors. Final images are printed on photo paper to maximize contrast, brightness and attention to detail for each image. ~ For the 35mm camera format, the normal focal length is about 50mm. (Warren Bruce, Photography 2, Glossary Normal lens: pageA41-A42. (Delmar Thomas Learning, Inc. 2002) 5 OCI- LI-13-807 VIEWS AND DISTANCES The four (4) views that arc provided here were assessed for visual impact and are described below. An icon of a star denotes the location of the proposed structure. Distances from which the views werc taken were measured from a scaled aerial view provided by New York State GIS mapping. View Point Key Distance View 1 View 2 View 3 View 4 View taken fi.om the lawn at the Village Green Historical arca, looking West-Northwest. Simulation of Before and After View taken from the driveway into the parking lot, looking Southeast. Simulation of Beforc and After View taken from the entrance into the church parking lot, looking East. Simulation of Before and After. View taken from the left comer of the parking lot area, looking Southeast. Simulation of Before and After. ±181 feet 4-172 feet ±217 feet ±230 feet 6 OCI- LI-13-807 OMNIPOINT Site Number: Ll-13-807 ~View point Site Location Project Address: 27245 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 65 Ramapo Valley Road Mahwah, NJ 07430 OMNIPOINT View 1. Existing view taken from the lawn at the Village Green Historical area, looking West-Northwest. Site Number [ Project Address: ~ ~ LI-13~807 .------~ ~J 27245 Main Road ~DMS~ CONSULTING65 Ramapo ValleySERVICES'Road INC. Cutchogue, NY 1 1935 Mahwah. NJ 07430 OMNIPOINT View Ia. Proposed view taken from the lawn at the Vt'l/age Green Historical area, looking West-Northwest. SiteNumber I ProjectAddress: I L1-13-807 ~"~"~ 27245 Main Road }m~s~ CONSULllNG SERVICES. INC. ~ 65 Ramapo Valley Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Mah~h. m 07430 OMNIPOINT View 2. Existing view taken from the driveway into the parking lot, looking Southeast. SiteNumber I/I Prq/ectAddress: Cutchogue, NY 1 1 935 Mahwah. NJ 07430 OMNIPOINT View 2a. Proposed view taken from the driveway into the parking lot, looking Southeast. 4: 27245 Main Road ~ l~lJ~ ~ CONSULTING SERVICES, IN~. * ~ 65 Ramapo Valley Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Mahwah, NJ 07430 View 3. Existing view taken from the entrance into the church parking lot, looking East. Site Number: L~13-807 Project Address; 27245 Main Road Cutchogu¢, NY 11935 DMS CONSULTING SERVICES, INC, 65 Ram apo Valley Road Mahwah, NJ 07430 OMNIPOINT View 4. Existing view taken from the/eft corner of the parking lot area, looking Southeast. SileNumber t/I PrqjectAddress: 27245 Main Road ~D~as~ CONSULTING SERVICES, INC_ L1-13-807 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Mahwah. ~U 07430 OMNIPOINT View 4a. Proposed view taken from the left corner of the parking lot area, looking Southeast. Site Number I Project Address: I ~ DMS CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. 27245 Main Road ~ 65 RamapoValleyRoad LI-13-807 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Mahwah. NJ 0?430 LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF ALAN CARDINALE MAP OF HIGHLAND ESTATES FILED 4/26/1977, FILE No. 65,]7. LOT 39 I I 1 STORy BUILDING S 4'5'57'10" W MAIN ROAD CGREENPORT ROAD) CS.R. 124.. 70 fEj 0 o / / NOir-8: -- OH CONCRETE CURB DROP CURB WALL EDGE OF PAVEMENT OVERHEAD WtRES ELECT/~JC CONTROL BOX TELEPHONE CONTROL SOX WELL CATCH BASIN DRAINAGE INLET / STRUCTURE SIGN LIGHT POLE UTILITY POLE STOCKADE FENCE WOOD FENCE CONCRETE 1. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO E~E USED FOR A TRANSFER OF T~TLE OR ANY FINANCIAL PURPOSE. 2. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A T~TLE REPORT AND THEREFORE, THE EXISTENCE OF ANY COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD, IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN OR ADDRESSED. EASEMENTS, BIGHTS--OF--WAY OF RECORD, IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN. HIGHLAND ESTATES, FILED 4/26/1977, FtLE No. 6537, SK g.~a~ PR J ch~a bT WJB BEu Barrett Bonacci & Van Weele, PC: Civil Engineers Surveyors Planners Tax Map: DISTRICT 175A Commerce Drive Haupp~uge, NY 11788 T63i 435.1111 ~ 631.435.1022 ~ bbvpc I000 SECTION 109 BLOCK2 LOT 17.1 PROPERTY CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUIHOLD SUFFOLK COUNIY, N.Y. BOUNDARY SURVEY ^~ST~O,~ ^07~. 1 of 1 COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3500 SUNR SE H GHWAY, SU TE D-203, GREAT RVER, NY 11739 /'THE Pf ESBYTEf IAN CHUf CH OF CUTCHOGUE) 27245 MAIN f D.. CUTCHOGUE, NY I I WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T $, LLP I~-I TP~S~INOLOOY DRIVE SETAUg~T, NY 117~3 VOICE : 6~1-~89-~4~0 FAX : ~1-689-84~ http://www.wfcaia.com DAT~ REVISION 11/10/08 PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 12/16/08 PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS DATE ISSUED TO DAT~ ISSUED TO 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING I 1 . EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: ~00 SQ.~.~ :~ ¢~;qG e~~& ~t EQUIPMENT: (2) S12000 CABIN~S, (2) BOOSTER CABIN~S, (1) BAKERY CAB~N~, ~ (1) UMTS CABIN~ AND (1) PPG CABIN~ U~lCnOg~.¢~ e¢ THE PRESB%ERiAN CHURCH OF CUTCNOGUE '¢~lU1~1][8 :: ¢¢ ~ ~ BUILDING OWNER: '' ~ ' ".~ ~ ~1~' 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 119Z5 t~ UTILI~ CONTACT: SuJ~o{k ~ .eL,[ PROJECT MANAGER: PAUL ~PASOTA (631) 22A~6651 ' ~ ' SP-1 SITE P~N ' ~ I~: ~ SP-2 EQUIPMENT P~N, ANTENNA D~A~LS, ~PICAL BAKERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET D~AILS AND P~NT~NG D~AIL 10/13/08 5 12/16/08 ' , ¢"' c~,,,,,~ CR,.U,, ' NORTH SP-3 NORTH AND SOUTH EL~ATIONS 10/15/08 5 12/16/08 , SP-4 ~ST AND WEST EL~ATiONS '~: D RECEIVED }APPROVED AS NOTED} PAUL LaPASOTA ~ REVIEWED (DISAPPROVED/REVISE} , ~ RECEIVED }APPROVED AS NOTED} 44 * MAZEN A~DWAN ~ REVIEWED {DISAPPROVED/REVISEJ ~ RECEIVED }APPROVED ~ NOTED( ~ HOWARD LEGER DATE ~ REVIEWED {DISAPPROVED/REVISEJ ., ~ APPROVED OoJd SpRH,; NO RT B RECEIVED }APPROVEDAS NOTED} Pone HOWARD LEGER DATE SHEET NO.: PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY ~1935 L1-13-807-C TITLE SHEET 10/08/08 AS NOTED DRAW~ BY: 07 7199 DP, AWING NO.: 1 OF 5 THE 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 ~Omnipoint, COMMUNICATIONS INC. ~ ~ EXISTING WOOD FENCE 8 .,~-~' ~// '~-. '%.__ / / 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETALrKE~, +¢ ~ 55 ,, ¢ ] /~ 'k. ~ / / VOICE : ~1-~ F~: ~-~ ~ ~¢~ 0 ~ ~/¢ % "% % / / http://www.wfcaia.com ~ / 2 11/10/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS ~ % ~ ~ EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ' 0~.%~ PORTION OF EXI~ING CHURCH STEEP~ TO 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW ~~ ~%~%~ ~:~ ~%x, ~ % ///~~~' ~¢~. ~EEP~SEMBLY TO MATCH EXI.ING CHURCHiN A~ R~PEC~ 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW12116/08 FOR FtL,NG .,..o.o..o..,.o,._.. OOYPATIBLE OONC~LYENT ~TERIAL CHURCH ~EEPLE ~SEMBLY TO GENE~Y MATCH ~I~ING ~EP~ / ¢~ rO% (~P. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE D~AIL Omnipoint ~ ~ ~' COMMUNICATIONS INC. .,.~..~:.,/~ _ ~ 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE =25.~6~ D-203, GREAT RIVER, NY L=39.27, 11739 . - THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ~ OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD FACILI~ NOTES cuTc.o~uE, L1-13-~7-C LEGEND A) ~o~o~. ~T..~ ~.~.~. A~ S.C., *.. ~.~ ~X,~T,~ O. ~.~*~ ~ 0~,~.~. ~ TREE LINE ~ FIRE HYDRANT H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACIL'~ SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARRY, BONACCl 0 10' 20' 40'~ CT ~SITE PLAN ~~, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION 5108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. A070628 DATED Augus[ 50, 2007 ~O~TH ~.~ ~0.: SCALE: 1 "=20'-0" D~AIL ~/SP-2 ~ ~ / ~ ' ~ ii~"' ~ ~ ~ -- -- ~ //// I~ / ~ / ~ ~EXISTING DRY WELL ANTENNA ~ ~ MECHANICAL INFO (1) PROPOSED O~NIPOINT BAKERY I ~ ~ / ~ ~ PART NO.: TMBXX-6516-R2M -MAX. WIND AR~: 2.9 SQ ......... ' ~EMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA SYSTEM ~ I -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED ~ -CONNECTOR ~PE' 7-16 DiN, FEMALE (4) ~OOD RAMP WiTH i // ~ / / /%% % / I -COLOR: OFF WHITE EXISTING HAND[ -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 MOUNTED , ~ ........... ~ o ... O; ~os~ ~,~ ~ WILLIAM F. COLLIN~ AIA DUNN~ C~IN~ ATOP~ PROPOSED EQUIPMENT A R C H I T E C T S, L L P PROPOSED DUN~GE PRNACY S MOUNTED EQUIPMENT (2) PROPOSED ~ ~ E-1 ~0~ D~ ~TA~T, ~ ~7~ PROPOSED BOOSTER C~IN~ ~ ~ VOI~ : ~-~ F~: DUNNAGE ATOP PROPOSED PROPOSED ~ · * ~ ~ · (~P. FOR (¢)) CABIN~ ATOP OMNIPOINT (2) PROPOSED EQU[PMENT , ~, ~ PROPOSED EQUIPME~ ~ ~ ~~ ~)~ DUNNAGE. SEE D~AiL I 5/SP-2 PROPOSED (1) PROPOSED GPS ~,..,~ ,.,~ .o,.~. ~o ANTENNA DETAILS ~NBING PROPOSED OMNIPOI~~ EQUlPME~ C~IN~. SCALE: 1"=1' 0,, PROPOSED SEE D~NL 5/SP-2 ~ DISCON BI~NG NOTE: PROPOSED PROPOSED OMNIPOI~ (2) CABLN~S TO BE NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT EXI~ING ~BLE ~Y MOUN~D NORTEL ~2000 EQUIPMENT CABIN.S SUPPLIED BY OMN~POINT, AND INSTALLED BY TO ~T WALL OF / CAB[N~ SUPPLIED BY CARRIER, CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ MANUFACTURER EXI~ING CHURCH INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. SPECIF~CATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. ~0. DA~ ~OH / 2 11/0/B8 ~S PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS BUILDING AND TO BE SPECIFICATIONS: 53" 27-1/2" DEEP a 12/%/08 AS PE~ ATTORNEY COMMENTS PAINTED TO MATCHApp~NCE OF f 4' 5" ~ 75-1/8" TALL x WIDE x EXI~ING ~ERIOR CELL CAPACI~: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT BUI~DIN~ WALL ~ ~, ~ _ WEIGHT. 1212 LBS ~ EQUIPMENT PLAN ~ X'~ *~ ~ ~ ~- ! / ' NORTH ~ i ~ ~ % % 10/13/08 FOR REVEW 1//10/08 FOR ~EWEW ~ ' ~ ......... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11/10/08 FOR FILING 5,_6,, 5'-6" , 7" 2'_6' % -~-- t ~ ~ ~ 12/1~/08 FOR REVIEW ~ ~ / ~ I 12/i6/08 FOE FILING ~ ~¢ ¢ ~ ~ PLAN * EQUIPMENT CAB. - ti // i]~ ~ OF WO~~ kORTH - ' ' ' Omnipoint ¢~ /~ / "', ' COMMUNICATIONS INC. PLAN ~ EQUIPMENT ~AB. PROPOSED STEEL GRATING ATOP DUNNAGE / ' ~ PROPOSED STEEL DUNNAGE MOUNT / / "" ~5500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE ~~P. BAKERY CABINET DETAILS su~-sAS~ S,A,, ~ ,OU~T~ TO ST~, O~a;~O W~T, ¢ SCALE: 5/4"=1' 0" 1/2"¢ H.S. BOLTS AND SADDLE CLIP FASTENERS. ~ ~ // ~ -, ~ B-205, GREAT11759RNER' NY NEW 6' TALL (MINIMUM) AMERICAN 1/2"¢ RUBBER HOSE AND ~2 GA. GALV. WIRE % ~' x~ THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ARB~RV?AE EVERGREEN TREES P~NTED PROVIDE TURN BUCKLES (5) OR TWIST ADJUSTMENT· ~¢ OFCUTCHOGUE ~ 5 0 o.c. To BE PLUMB AS SHOWN // / / // INSTALL STAINLESS STEEL RI CEDAR BARK CHIPS (V.I.F.) OR EQUIVALENT k, X I / L1-13-807-C (3) CEDAR STAKES DRIVEN AND % // ~ / x/I EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, 120 INTERVALS AND EQUAL-DISTANT ~~ ,/ %%~ / / 0/20/0 FERTILIZER: AT THE RATE OF FRO~ TREE (5) POUNDS PER ~¢ARD. WATER ~ ...................... j ~ ....... *, //% ~ / / THOROUGHLY AND IFILL TO EXISTING CAB~ET DETAILS AND PLANING DET~ ~ ./~ , >~%/ / EARTH LINE ON TREE TRUNK. , % ~X~ r ~ I IPROPOSED GALV. STEELGRATINGATOP 10/08/08 077199 NOTE: DUNNAGE DARE ROOT%%% ~% ~P~NTS WILL NOT BE ~ / ~ ] /~, PERMI~ED. ~'lmb'.u' ub '-- L .'V '~ ASNOTEB PRUNED IN ~~1 ~m~- SUB-BASE SHALL BE MOUNTED TO STEEL D~ ACCEPTED~~ SADDLE CLIP FASTENER'S· CT SI) 2 ~ SUflSOIL SCALE: 3/4"=1' O' SCALE: 1"=1'-0" / EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE , T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE ~:~ (B) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE :- CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE ~~ IN ALL RESPECTS (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETNL 2/SP-2 o ~ z ~ :b54'-4" AGL ~ HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF EXISTING STEEPLE TO BE REMOVED ~ ~. OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS AND REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT SCREENING~ FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL TO MATCH EXISTING ~u c W ~- A R C H I T E C T S, LLP ~ o L :~47'-4" AGL ~ ' z ~_ ~- OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH ~) ~ EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING A'mc INTO STEEPLE ~L 12-1 TE~OI~ DRIVE S~TAUI~, HY 11733 VOICE : 031-68~8450 Y~C~ ~ 631-68~-845~ http://www.wfcaia.¢um ~ ~ (1) PROPOSED OPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED PROPOSED OMNIPOINT CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETAIL 5/SP-2 EAST SiDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE ~ ~ TRAY TO BE PAl.TED TO MATC. APPEAl. CE OF ~ ,,: (~) P.oPOSED oM.,PO,NT EQU,PMENT C^B,N~ ATOP EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL- PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND 4'-0" GATE ~ I ~ MOUNTED TO PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT PPC CABINET (14) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDINO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-2 (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS ATOP -~.~' PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (BEYOND) ~ONSt~TAN~D' (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT BATrERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT & PROPOSED SHRUBS NO. DATE RE%~SION P- __ ~ T.O. PROPOSED ~ 4 12116/08 RS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS DAT~ I~LrED TO DATE ISSLr~ TO . 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW NORTHWEST ELEVATION ./lO/O8 ROR ~,E,N~ /u/~"= 1 ' 0"12/16/08 FOR REVIEW SCALE: 1 12/1~/08 FOR FILING -- ~ T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE ~ CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE ~ ~t --. IN ALL RESPECTS (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETAIL 2/SP-2- ~ II II HATCHED AREA iNDICATES PORTION OF EXISTING STEEPLE TO BE REMOVED ~ AND REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT SCREENING ~ 71,1{! ,l,llj~ z® ~: ::1:54'-4" AGL ~ FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL TO MATCH EXIS~NG ~ ~ ~ /Iii iii\ ~ L~ ( OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS~F , , { o ~ :E47'-4" AGL ,~ PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH ~ · ~- ~ ,~, ~ OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS Ex,ST,.G c.u.c. BU,LD,.G ,NTO STEEPLE / Omnipoint ~ ~ ~ ~o PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND 4'-0" gATE PROPOSED OMNIPOINT CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH ~ DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-2 BUlL DING. PRO POS ED CAB LE TRAY TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARAN CE ~ ~ i~ ~~.///~/ (1) PRO P,OSED CPS UN IT MOUNTED TO PRO POS ED 5500 SUNRISE H WY,, SUITE11739 OF EXISTING EX'PlOP BUILDING WALL ~ ~ ~ ~ (2)OMNIPOINqrpRoPOsEDEQUIPMENToMNIPOINTCABINET'EQUIPMENTSEE DETAILcABiNETs4/SP-2ATOP D-205, GREAT RIVER, NY ~e~? ,~' ~,~' ~ ~ ,m..~ ~ /~ ~ ,-.. , (1) PROPIOSED OMNIPOINT BAI'i'ERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ~-~'~-9 42~u ,~r ,-~¢;;~3~ ,{~4!,,?/ %. ::~-5 cj~ //- ~ --%% % c**~,~¢/ ~u~¢¢ ~ '~-/ /- (1) PROPIOSED UMTS CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE ,,:ar~ & PROPOSED SHRUBS NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS +8'-11" T.o. PROPOSED ~ ~ SOUTHEAST ELEVATION ~ ~o.~ SCALE: 1/8"=1 '-0" 4 OF 5 EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE . T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE ~ (B) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE ~ c~ IN ALL RESPECTS CIYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DE'TAIL 2/SP-2 ~ ~d ::1:54'--4" AGL ~ HATCHED AREA INDICATES pOE~'ION OF EXlSllNG STEEPLE TO BE _z ~ ~. OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WfTh PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE ~< m~ W A CONCEALMENT SCREENING FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL TO L~o A Px C H ][ T E C T S, ]_, I., P klATCH EXISTING ~; ,47'-4' AGLgh ~ OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS "- PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH o m 12-1 TEC~INOLOG"Y DP,~/~[ SET, AUKET, INY 11733 CABINET. SEE DETAIL 5/8P-2 VOICE : 631.-689-8450 FAX: 631.-689-8459 htt p://www.wfcaia.com (2) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL 5/SP-2 (14-) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOiNT UMTS CABINET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE \', ~ ~ . PROPOSED OMNIPOINT CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO TRAY TO BE PNNTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF MOUNTED TO PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE ~ ~ __ ; · DUNNAGE. SEE DETNL 5/SP-2 ::: ........... // / / ~ II II II II I1~1 ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 / OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT ''j~i :1~ -~-? I:~ I-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ GRADEO' 0" ~-~ NORTHEAST ELEVATION ', T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE ~- -- (B) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE ~ ~ IN ALL RESPECTS (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETAIL 2/SP-2 ~ u ¢- Of PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS z ~_ ¢- OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS _------ Omnipoint, ~/I _~5~ REPLACED W~TH PROPOSED RP COMRA*IBLE CONCEALMENT SOREENINO PRAMINO ASSEMBLY MATERIAL COMMUNICATIONS INC. CAT[ MOUNTED TO PROPOSED OMN~PO~NT EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE ~ ~:-~ 3~00 SUNRISE HWY,, SUITE ~--I~ D-203, GREAT RIVER, NY (14) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ? I ~ PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATFIC (1) PROPOSED OMN~PO~NT ~rrE~ CAB~Nrr I IH[ PRES~YI~RIAN CHURCH ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE I OF CUTCHO(3UE (BEYOND). SEE DETAil 3/SP-2~1 ~ &L~-- : :1 (1) PROPOSED PPC CABINET ATOP PROPOSED ~ ~ -~-- ~ B: 27245 MAIN ROAD EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE I ...... I : CUtCHOGUE, NY 119~§ I ......... LI-13-807-C EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS II- L~--"~ ~ II- /~, PROPOSED SHRUBS EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS I ~ ~8'-11" ~ ~ I F ....... -- ~-~ - DATE: PRQ/ECT NO.: SOUTHWEST ELEVATION ~CALE: ~/8"=~ '-0' __ February22,2010 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: T-Mobile Northeast LLC (" T-Mobile ") Premises: The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 T-Mobile Site # LI3807C / WFC Project #: 07-7199 WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA Partners William F. Collins, AIA Stcven R. Sarllniero, AIA Nell A. MacDonald, AIA, LEED AP Partner, £merltns Thomas R. Turkel, AIA Director of Planning Gary S. Shumway Associate Paul lC Gart~lmann, AIA, LEED AP Dear Madam/Sir: This report addresses the effects of sound that would be emitted by the radio cabinets to be installed by T- Mobile at the premises. The cabinets proposed are (2) Nortel GSM BTS S12000 Units, (2) Cell Booster AC Powered Outdoor Cabinets, (1) UMTS Ericsson RBS 3106 Unit, (1) Magnetek Battery Backup MPE5566 and (1) PPC cabinet. A total of four units of the proposed seven will emit sound. Per the manufacturer's published product data, each Nortel GSM BTS S12000 cabinet running at maximum capacity will generate a sound level of 65 decibels ~ 3'-0". The total sound emitted by the two (2) proposed Nortel GSM BTS SI2000 cabinets running simultaneously at maximum speed operation is determined to be 69.77 decibels at 3'-0" from the cabinets. Per the manufacturer's published product data, the UMTS Ericsson RBS 3106 cabinet running at maximum capacity will generate a sound level of 85 decibels at ~ 3'-0". Per the manufacturer, each Magnetek Battery Backup MPE5566 cabinet running at maximum capacity will generate a sound level of approximately 69 decibels at ~ 3'-0". The manufacturer of the CCI Cell Booster AC Powered Outdoor Cabinet has not documented the sound emissions but indicates that it does have some minor sound emissions, similar to a Personal Computer (PC) fan. The proposed PPC cabinet is an electric/telco connection box and does not produce sound emissions. The combined sound emission for all sound producing cabinets referenced above at the nearest property line improved by a residence, which is at a distance of 74'-2" +/- from the location of the cabinets, is estimated to be 57.93 decibels. 12-1 FE( IINOI.O(;'I I)RIgE SEIAI KE'I', N'I 11733 PH: 631-689-84511 FAX: 631-68%8459 WV~'W.WFCAIA.COM It should be noted that this level assumes the "worst case" scenario (i.e. all equipment running simultaneously at maximum power), which may occur rarely. Moreover, at 57.93 dBA, the level of associated sound falls to approximately a sound level related to normal conversation (60 dBA). Therefore, the level of sound will have a minimal impact and is below accepted norms. Additionally, the proposed plans have been developed to incorporate 6fi high vinyl fencing surrounding the equipment, which will be bordered by arborvitae. Additionally, arborvitae shall be installed opposite the equipment location, along the north property line, to further attenuate the sound emissions. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerel.¥~7 Paul K. Gartelmann, AIA, LEED AP Associate r 10-1 I'E( HNOLOGY DRIVE SETAIiKET, NY 11753 VOICE:631-689-84~;0 Fa.X: 6.tl-689-8459 tl]'TP://V~'~,~,V¥.'~'F( AIA.COM A 5CiNET:X C 0 R P 0 R A T I 0 N ENGINEERING REPORT FEBRUARY 12, 2010 PREPARED AND SIGNED BY LOUIS G. CORNACCHIA, B.E.E. PRESIDENT SCINETICS CORP. EVALUATION OF RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS FROM THE PROPOSED OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PCS INSTALLATION WITH ANTENNAS, (SITE#LI-13-807C- THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE) TO BE MOUNTED WITHIN THE STEEPLE OF AN EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING, LOCATED AT SECTION 109, BLOCK 2, LOT 17.1, 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK. B iN TX C 0 R P 0 R A T I 0 N Mr. Tim Fincham Manager, Engineering/Development T-Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 Sunrise Hwy., Suite D203 Great River, New York 11739 Subject: Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions from the proposed T- Mobile Northeast, LLC Installation with Antennas (Site #LI- 13-807C- (The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue), to be mounted within the Steeple of an existing building located at Section 109, Block 2, Lot 17.1, 27245 Main Road, Cntchogue, New York. Attn.: T-Mobile Northeast LLC, As per the request of the applicant, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, enclosed please find: An analysis of findings and conclusions prepared by SCINETICS Corporation Engineers on the following: Maximum Power Density of the combined field at the closest point to the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC Facility ("Facility"), Antenna Installation, and at specific radial distances from the Transmitting Antennas, where people can be. Calculated levels compared to allowable EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991/NCRP (47 CFR § 1.1310), Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA and the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) Limits C SUMMARY This report is the result of an extensive study of Electromagnetic Field Intensities (EMF- Power Densities) emitted by the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Installation, with Antennas (Site #LI-13-807C - The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue), to be mounted within the Steeple of an existing Church Building, located Section 109, Block 2, Lot 17.1, 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York. The study incorporates the most conservative considerations to determine practical combined cumulative worst case Power Densities (EMF) resulting from the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC/ GSM/UMTS and typical potential future Wireless Carrier (MetroPCS) transmitting antennas the Cutchogue community could theoretically encounter. CONCLUSIONS The Power Densities emitted by the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC Antenna Installation base station are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The issue of EMF compliance is pm-erupted from the municipality regulatory powers beyond the applicants stating that it has examined the emissions in accordance with "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" with analytical adjustments to equations per Richard Tell Associates and Ed Mantiply of the FCC Office of Engineering Technology and that the applicant is in compliance with the FCC/NCRP MPE of 1000 microwatts/cm, sq. General Public or "unrestricted environment" Standard. This Standard is recognized by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that; "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof, may regulate the placement, construction and modification of personal wireless services facilities on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequencies emissions to the extent that such Facilities comply with the Commissions (FCC) Regulations concerning such emissions". This law directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to offer assistance to state and local governments in wireless facilities issues. On August 1, 1996 the FCC adopted portions of the 1991 ANSI/IEEE, and NCRP Maximum permitted exposure (MPE) criteria. The results of this theoretical worst case safety analysis clearly indicate that the EMF emissions contributed by the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC antenna installation will be far below EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1- 1991/NCRP (47 CFR § 1.1310), Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA, and NYSDOH limits. The emissions broadcast from the T-Mobile Northeast LLC Class C transmitters [GMSK (FM) Modulation], are in the non-ionizing 1930-1945 MHz frequency band. The EMF levels attributed to the emissions contributed by the PCS Broadcast Systems are well below EMF Standards which in the Scientific consensus based on overwhelming evidence, are well below threshold effects. The derived Standards have added safety limits to the threshold levels. When EMF levels encountered are at or below the Standard, no health effects occur, therefore no cumulative effect is possible regardless of exposure duration. D The theoretical highest combined cumulative emissions from the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC GSM/UMTS and typical potential future Wireless Carrier (MetroPCS) transmitting antennas the Cutchogue community could be exposed to at an elevation of 16 feet above ground level, would be less than 0.85%* of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. This combined cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be emitted would be 285 times below all applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. (See Table IIA-1) * The theoretical highest combined cumulative emissions from the proposed T- Mobile Northeast LLC GSM/UMTS and typical potential future Wireless Carrier (MetroPCS) transmitting antennas the_on site church building rooftop could be exposed to at an elevation of 34 feet above ground level, would be less than 1.18% of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. This combined cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be emitted would be 84.7 times below all applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. Personnel, while within and six feet above (@ R= 1 foot) the Steeple Interior area or the exterior peak rooftop of the proposed site building, could bc exposed to a theoretical maximum combined cumulative EMF level of less than 4.._.~0 % of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards resulting from the proposed T- Mobile Northeast LLC GSM/UMTS and typical potential future Wireless Carrier (MetroPCS) transmitting antenna Sectors. This combined cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be emitted, would 25 times below the 100% permitted of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. Personnel, while at Far Field threshold (R =22 feet), six feet above the Steeple the exterior peak rooftop of the proposed site building, could be exposed to a theoretical maximum combined cumulative EMF level of less than 4.._.~0% of the applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards resalting from the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC GSM/UMTS and typical potential future Wireless Carrier (MetroPCS) transmitting antenna Sectors. This combined cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be emitted, would 25 times below the 100% permitted of thc applicable FCC MPE General Public EMF Standards. Typically, the EMF power densities at the interior top floor level would be 10 to 100 times lower than predicted, due to the attenuating characteristics of roof and building materials which are ignored in this analysis - ( "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997"-page 23). (Note: All future co-locating carriers must complete an FCC Compliance analysis, including the existing carrier Emissions as determined herein, providing combined cumulative EMF emissions impact.) This EMF level and all other levels presented in Table II-IIB are theoretical maximas that could occur only under worst case, assuming conditions such as in phase reflections occurring steady state, all transmitters operating simultaneously and continuously and excluding resistance or attenuating characteristics of construction material used in homes, E schools and other similar structures. In reality, actual field measurements continually provides readings of power density levels far lower than the more conservative analytical levels indicated. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, is the applicable Federal Law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of PCS Radio facilities. It is the conclusion of this report, that the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC application meets the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) present criteria and the FCC criteria as it is effected by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, with respect to environmental considerations of RF emissions. Further, Mobile PCS Radio Frequency Bands do not interfere with television reception, telephones or radio reception due to the wide separation of the Broadcast Bands as mandated and monitored by the FCC. (See Table I) ANALYSIS This critical analysis* incorporated Radio antenna emission characteristics and included the following assumptions which exceed realistic conditions of operations, but will yield worst case EMF ~ Power Densities ordinarily not realized and never exceeded. 1. All antennas are located at the lowest elevation indicated in the construction drawing to absorb errors in actual locations and to bring the antenna cluster closer to facilities and citizens than would normally be the case. 2. All antennas will be transmitting continuously, 24 hours a day. 3. All channels will be communicating simultaneously. 4. Power levels emitting from the antennas are increased by a factor of 4.0, to take into account possible in - phase reflections at any point in the community, which is rarely the case, and if so, are never continuous. 5. At all distances greater than 2000 feet, the Power Densities decrease by a factor of four (4) with every doubling of distance. The Wireless Antenna Installation in question is an assembly of low power antennas that emits radio energy at levels 100 to 1000 times below those of Commercial Broadcast Antennas. Given the distances between the antennas studied in this report and the community field points in question, as well as the overall community, the densities of the radio energy are extremely low. * Reference Basis for calculations: 1- "Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. OET Bulletin No. 65 -Edition 97-01" 2- Copies of data, sketches, drawings (January-2010) and specifications submitted by T-Mobile Northeast LLC are the basis for our studies, calculations and analysis. The attached photograph indicating acceptable EMF emissions from various household appliances provides a further perspective for better understanding the EMF levels encountered in this summary. F Frequency Bands: According to the FCC, microwave (MW) frequencies cover the approximate band from 900 MegaHertz (MHz) to 300 GigaHertz (GHz). One MegaHertz (MHz) is a million cycles and One GigaHertz (GHz) is a billion cycles per second. Table I lists several other communication and interrogation frequencies used in the United States. Clearly, a large fraction of commercial and private telecommunication involves MW Frequencies. TABLE I (Some Frequency Definitions) Type of System FM Radio VHF TV UHF TV Mobile Phone: Cellular/PCS Typical Radar Systems Frequency Interval 88 MHz to 108 MHz 174 MHz to 216 MHz 470 MHz to 806 MHz 806 MHz to 2.0 GHz 200 MHz to 3.0 Ghz G The Principal Features Of The Proposed Installation And The Assumptions Considered In The Analysis Are As Follows; a) The proposed wireless radio antennas will be mounted within the Steeple of an existing Church Building as indicated by the T-Mobile Northeast LLC drawings. The elevation from the centerline of the proposed antennas to the base of the existing Building will be 47.3 and 54.3 feet. The closest an individual could approach the proposed T- Mobile Northeast LLC transmitting antenna C/L would be 13.0 feet. This assumes a 6 foot tall person, with the distances being measured from the top of that individual's head standing directly below the transmitting antenna panels described within the existing Building Steeple platform level. b) The antenna clusters will consist of four (4) Sectors, using two (2) quadpol Directional type antenna (Decibel TMBXX-6516-R2M or equivalent) for proposed carrier T-Mobile Northeast LLC in each sector for transmission and receive. The physical arrangement of these antennas is illustrated in drawings provided by T-Mobile Northeast LLC. (Assumed 0 degree downtilt for all antennas in this analysis.) c) The maximum number of channels that will be assigned to the antenna array, for proposed carrier T-Mobile Northeast LLC, in any direction, will not exceed eight (8). The maximum power from the transmitting antennas in each sector, with all eight (8) channels transmitting simultaneously, will not exceed 2000 Watts, ERP (@ 250 watts ERP/channel). The radio transmissions will be at frequencies between 1930 and 1945 MegaHertz. The maximum number of channels that will be assigned to UMTS will not exceed one (1). The maximum power from the transmitting antennas in each sector will not exceed 500 Watts, ERP. The radio transmissions will be at 2.1 GigaHertz. d) The coverage pattern of the voice antennas will be in four (4) sectors and is considered to transmit circularly, 360 degrees. This will provide a worst case situation, resulting in the maximum possible power density. e) It was assumed that the elevation of the Cutchogue community a radius within 2000 feet is equal to the elevation at the base of the Building, with exceptions as noted. f) All field points am at Radial distances indicated from the base of the existing Building where the vertical line of the Transmitting antennas intersect. H g) The additional future carrier RF and elevation data including transmitting characteristics, to be located on the existing Building rooftop: Typical potential future Wireless Carrier (MetroPCS-2130-2140 MHz)) Maximum ERP/Channel Number of Channels/sector Number of Sectors Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas/Sector Antenna centerline height above grade Antenna Model-Kathrein 800-10504 Directional- Frequency of transmission-2130-2140 MHz 400 watts ERP 7 3 2 40 feet Gain= 15.56 dBd POWER DENSITY CALCULATIONS-Analytical Data The Scinetics Engineering Report represents worst case scenarios in determining EMF analysis. One of the considerations is the maximum number of channels which could be transmitted by each of the proposed antennas in each sector. Further, in determining maximum public exposure to EMF emissions, potential close proximity of the antennas must be defined ("near field" region, or "far field" region). The following will examine procedures followed in accordance with FCC OET Bulletin 65- Edition 97-01, with analytical adjustments to equations per Richard Tell and Ed Mantiply of the FCC Office of Engineering Technology. FOR PROPOSED T-Mobile Northeast LLC ANTENNAS: Andrew Decibel TMBXX-6516-R2M FOR 1930-1950 MHz for PCS L= _.984 =0.51 ft frequency (MHz) Frequency =1930 MHz "Antennas"-by John D. Kraus, Mcgraw Hill 1950 Section 2 R(NF)= D2= 8.8 feet 4X R(FF)--0.6D2 = 21.2 feet D= height of antenna panel--4.25 feet "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Pages 27 & 29) Proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC 1930-1950 MHz Antennas: @ P=250 WERP: (R=I foot) per channel The power density in the near field region can be determined as follows: Snf= On axis maximum power density in the near field Snf=180 Pnet = 11477 gw/cm2@8 channels O YIR'D Pnet =Input power to antenna=51,407,916 gw @8 channels D=antenna height = 4.25 feet R =distance from C/L to point of interest=l foot 0 =beamwidth= 65° degrees ct =gain= 15.9 dBd Proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC UMTS 2.1 GHz Antenna: @ P=500 WERP: (R=I foot) per channel The power density in the near field region can be determined as follows: Snf= On axis maximum power density in the near field Snf=lS0 Pnet = 2869 gw/cm2@ 1 channel 0 HR'D Pnet =Input power to antenna= 12,851,979 gw @ 1 channel D=antenna height = 4.25 feet R =distance from C/L to point of interest=l foot 0 =beamwidth= 65° degrees ct =gain= 15.9 dBd FOR TYPICAL POTENTIAL FUTURE WIRELESS CARRIER (MetroPCS) ANTENNAS: Kathrein 800-10504 FOR 2130-2140 MHz PCS ~= 984 = 0.46 ft frequency (MHz) "Antennas"-by John D. Kraus, Mcgraw Hill 1950 Section 2 R(NF)= D2 = 11 feet R(FF)=0.6D2 = 26.7 feet D =height of antenna panel=4.5 feet "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Pages 27 & 29)) For MetroPCS 2130-2140 MHz Transmitting Antennas: @ P=400 WERP: (R=I foot) The power density in the near field region can be determined as follows: Snf= On axis maximum power density in the near field Snf=lS0 Pnet = 17,480 gw/cm2 @7 channels O HRD Pnet =Input power to antenna=82,900,000 gw @7 channels D=antenna height = 4.5 feet R =distance from C/L to point of interest=l foot 0 =beamwidth= 65° degrees ct =panel gain= 15.6 dBd K Directly behind proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC transmitting transmitting Antennas within Steeple interior Personnel standing to rear of the proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC Steeple mounted transmitting antenna Sectors, the EMF exposure will be primarily from rear of antenna (an emission magnitude resulting from the antenna front panel emission mitigated by the front to back ratio of the antenna in question), therefore: Directly behind proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC transmitting transmitting Antennas within Steeple interior: (@ R=I foot) T-Mobile Northeast LLC 1930-1945 GSM (8 channels) · Rear of antenna emissions (Snf) determined by antenna model front-to-back ratio --24 dB-power ratio=251; Snf= Snf/24 dB (11477/251) = 45.7 [tw/cm2 = 4.6% (FCC MPE General Public Standard =1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) T-Mobile Northeast LLC 2.1 GHz UMTS (1 channel) · Rear of antenna emissions (Snf') determined by antenna model front-to-back ratio =24 dB-power ratio=251; Snf'= Snf/24 dB (2869/251) = 11.4 ~tw/cm2 = 1.1.% (FCC MPE General Public Standard =1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) Total Combined Cumulative Pct. FCC MPE EMF of a proposed T-Mobile Northeast LLC Sector = 5.7% Directly behind MetroPCS transmitting transmitting Antennas within Steeple interior: (@ R=i foot) · Rear of antenna emissions (Snf) determined by antenna model front-to-back ratio =28 dB-power ratio = 631; Snf= Snf/28 dB (17480/631) = 27.7 gw/cm2 = 2.8% (FCC MPE General Public Standard =1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) L Roofpeak/Top Floor MetroPCS 2130-2140 Mhz Sector panel (7 channels) Personnel below proposed antenna Centerline, (elevation difference, 40'-(28'+6.0') = 6.0 feet): Personnel below proposed Centerline transmitting antennas at an elevation of six feet above the existing Rooftop surface, at a distance of R=i foot (Near Field Region), (elevation difference, - 6.0 feet) (@7 channels): · Off axis distance from antenna C/L is greater than height of antenna panel (Kathrein 800-10504 D = 4.5 feet): then; Sn~'= Snf/Rx20 dB = 17480 = 29.1 lw/cm2 = 2.9% 600 (FCC General Public Standard=1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Page 30-Rel115] ) T-Mobile Northeast LLC General public, Any point (R) six feet above Roofpeak/top floor area surface below T- Mobile Northeast LLC transmitting antenna Sector, in Transition Near Field Region, (Elevation difference H=47.3'-(28+6')= 13')- GSM (@ 8 channels)- Transmitting antennas at an elevation of six feet above the top floor surface, at a distance of R=i foot (Transition Near Field Region), (elevation difference, -13 feet): If off axis distance from antenna C/L (H=R=13 feet) is greater than height of antenna panel (Decibel model described), then; SnI'= Snf/Rx20 dB = 11477 = 8.8 [tw/cm2 = 0.88% 1300 (FCC General Public Standard=1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Page 30-Ref[15]) UMTS (@ 1 channel)- Transmitting antennas at an elevation of six feet above the top floor surface, at a distance of R=i foot (Transition Near Field Region), (elevation difference, -13 feet): If off axis distance from antenna C/L (H=R=13 feet) is greater than height of antenna panel (Decibel model described), then; Snf'= Snf/Rx20 dB = 2869 = 2.2 gw/cm2 0.22% 1300 (FCC General Public Standard=1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Page 30-Retll5]) Combined Cumulative T-Mobile + MetroPCS Pct. FCC MPE EMF = 4.0*% M *Typically, the EMF power densities at the top floor level would be 10 to 100 times lower than predicted, due to the attenuating characteristics of roof and building materials which are ignored in this analysis.-("OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997"-page 23). Threshold Region-six feet above Rooftop Peak: transmitting antenna sector Far Field Analysis - Elevation difference H=47.3'-(28+6')= 13', R = 22 feet): T-Mobile 1930-1945 MHz GSM (8 channels) Where S(ff)=power density EIRP=power output of antenna relative to an isotropic radiator =P(ERP)x 1.64 (correctionfactor) R= 22 feet, elev. diff. 13.0 feet F=The gronnd reflectivity n=number of channels=8 FO=Relative field factor (relative numeric gain) S(ff) = n F EIRP FO = 4.23 microwatts/cm, sq. 4~R2 (FCC MPE General Public Standard=1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) = 0.42% T-Mobile 1930-1945 MHz PCS UMTS (1 channel) Where S(ff)=power density EIRP=power output of antenna relative to an isotropic radiator =P(ERP)x 1.64 (correctionfactor) R= 22 feet, elev. diff. 13.0 feet F=The ground reflectivity n=number of channels=l Fo=Relative field factor (relative numeric gain) S(ff) = n F EIRP FO = 1.06 microwatts/cm, sq. 4~R2 (FCC General Public Standard=1000 microwatts/cm, sq.) = 0.11% Combined Cumulative Pct. FCC MPE EMF on top Floor = 0.53%* N MetroPCS 2130-2140 MHz Transmitting Antennas: Threshold Region-six feet above Rooftop Peak: transmitting antenna sector Far Field Analysis - Elevation difference H=40-(28+6')= 6', R = 22 feet): Where S(ff)=power density E1RP=power output of antenna relative to an isotropic radiator =P(ERP)x 1.64 (correctionfactor) R= 22 feet, elev. diff. 6.0 feet F=The ground reflectivity n=number of channels=7 FO=Relative field factor (relative numeric gain) S(ff) = n F E1RP FO = 24.6 microwatts/cm, sq. 4hR2 (FCC MPE General Public Standard=1000 micmwatts/cm, sq.) = 2.46% Total Combined Cumulative T-Mobile + MetroPCS Pct. FCC MPE EMF = 4.0*% *Typically, the EMF power densities at the top floor level would be 10 to 100 times lower than predicted, due to the attenuating characteristics of roof and building materials which are ignored in this analysis.-("OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997"-page 23). TABLE IIA-1 EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ./PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDS PROPOSED T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, ANTENNA INSTALLATION (SITE#LI-13-807C- The Presbyterian Church of Cutchogue), 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York Field Point - Any point in the community-16.0 feet above ground Antenna System Elevation Power Standard Calculated Pement of Feet WERP FCC/NCRP EMF Density Standard General Public T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 1930-1945 MHz GSM (Proposed) 47.3/54.3 250 1000 2.81 0.28 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 2.1 GHz UMTS (Proposed) 47.3/54.25 500 1000 0.70 0.07 TYPICAL POTENTIAL FUTURE WIRELESS CARRIER (MetroPCS) 2130-2140 Mhz (Typical proposed) 40.0 400 1000 4.96 0.50 Total Percentage Of All Antenna Sources 0.85%* EMF emissions contributed by transmitting antennas in differing frequency bands are regulated by MPE Standards for the specific bands in which the emissions are analyzed. When adding the emissions resulting from transmissions in differing frequency bands, the resulting percentages of the emissions compared to the governing MPE standards are added. Per the FCC, percentages of EMF Density levels of applicable Standards, as specified by the FCC OET BulletinNo. 65 Edition 97.01, are addressed as follows: "Therefore, in mixed or broad band fields, where a number of different frequencies are involved, the contributing of all RF sources must be considered. When different limits are recommended for different frequencies, the fraction of (or percentages) the limit incurred within each frequency interval should be determined, and the sum of all such fractions (or pementages) should not exceed 1.0 (or 100 percent)" (See section 4.1 in Appendix A). *See Figure A&Figure B P TABLE II EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ. T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROPOSED SITE: LI-13-807C- THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK Proposed Lower than the 1996 Percentage of the 1996 T-Mobile Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points PCS Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE Act FCC/ANSI;IEEE 1930 MHz C95.1-1992 General C95.1-1992 General Antenna Public Exposure Public Exposure Emissions Standard (1000) by a (1000) Standard factor of Point I 0.62 1600 0.06% R= 10'- Base of Building Elev. - 6' Point 2 3.85 259 0.39% R=75'- Existing Church Building Roof Elev. - 34' Point 3 1.00 1000 0.10% R=100'- Nearby Framed Homes Elev.- 16' Point 4 2.20 450 0.22% R=400'- Librury/School Elev. - 16' Point 5 2.81 355 0.28% R=500'- Cutchogue Community Elev. - 16' Point 6 1.11 900 0.11% R= 1000'- Cntchogue Community Elev. -16' Point 7 0.28 3570 0.03% R--2000'- Cntchogue Community Elev. -16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 or less than 0.01% Q TABLE IIA EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM,SQ, T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROPOSED SITE; LI-13-807C- THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK Proposed Lower than thc 1996 Percentage of the 1996 T-Mobile Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points UMTS Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE 2.1 GHz C95. I-1992 General C95.1-1992 General Antenna Public Exposure Public Exposure Standard (1000) by a (1000) Standard Emissions factor of Point 1 0.15 6500 0.01% R=I0'- Base of Building Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.96 1000 0.10% R=75'- Existing Church Building Roof Elev. - 34' Point 3 0.25 3660 0.03% R=100'- Nearby Framed Homes Elev. - 16' Point 4 0.55 1800 0.03% R=400'- Library/School Elev. -16' Point 5 0.70 1400 0.07% R=500'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.28 3500 0.03% R=I000'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Point 7 0.07 14000 0.01% R=2000'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 or less than 0.01% R TABLE IIB ,EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.S(~. T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROPOSED SITE: LI-13-807C- THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCI-IOGUE CUTCI-IOGUE~ NEW YORK Typical Lower than the 1996 Percentage of the 1996 Wireless Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Carrier Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE Act FCC/ANSI/IEEE 2.1 GHz C95.1-1992 General C95.1-1992 General Antenna Public Exposure Public Exposure Emissions Standard (1000) by a (1000) Standard factor of Point 1 5.86 170 0.59% R--10'- Base of Building Elev. - 6' Point 2 6.94 145 0.69% R--75'- Existing Church Building Roof Elev. - 34' Point 3 2.25 440 0.22% R--100'u Nearby Framed Homes Elev.- 16' Point 4 4.80 208 0.48% R--400'- Library/School Elev. -16' Point 5 4.96 200 0.50% R~500'- Cutchogue Community Elev. -16' Point 6 1.57 630 0.16% R~- 1000'- Cutchogue Community Elev. u 16' Point 7 0.39 2500 0.04% R=2000'- Cutchogue Community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 or less than 0.01% EMF STANDARDS REVIEW - The U.S. Congress adopted "The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969" (NEPA) which requires all government agencies to take into account the potential environmental impact of their actions. The agencies must consider whether their actions significantly affect the "the quality of the human environment". To implement this mandate, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules covering the NEPA in licensing and approving facilities and operations under its jurisdiction. Rules adopted were codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Facilities or operations specified must provide information assessing the environmental effect of their proposal. In the case of RF radiation, the environmental effect would be the relative health risk to people living or working near or at the facility in question. The FCC was required by NEPA to make a determination as to whether the facilities or operations it approves may significantly affect the human environment with regard to RF emissions. As there was no federal standard for exposure to RF emissions, the FCC chose to rely upon a recognized non-government standard. The FCC selected the "American National Standard Safety Level With Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, "300 KiloHertz (kHz) to 100 GigaHertz (GHz)" prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1982. The protection guides recommended by ANSI were the guidelines the FCC had identified for using in evaluating environmental significance with respect to Human Exposure to RF emissions. The FCC adopted rules which required preparation of environmental assessment if the particular facility or operation would cause exposure of workers or the general public to levels of radio frequency radiation in excess of the ANSI protection guides. The rule was contained in 47 CFR 1.1307(d). That rule applied to facilities or operations licensed or authorized under the following parts of the Commission's Rules, 5, 21 Subpart (K), 25, 73, 74 (Subparts A, G, I, and L), and 80. The facilities and operations licensed or authorized under all other parts, subparts or sections of the Commission's Rules were categorically excluded from consideration. In 1986 the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Sub-Committee SC-53, published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure (NCRP - "Biological effects and exposure criteria for radio frequency electromagnetic fields." NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland). Sub-Committee SC-53 independently retained Radiation Frequency Protection Guidelines (RFPGs) similar to those of the 1982 ANSI Standard but with one notable exception: two tiers appear, one for occupational exposure and one for exposure of the general public. T In 1993, the EPA, aware of the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making (In the matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation, August 13, 1993. ET Docket No. 93-62), recommended adoption of the 1996 NCRP Limits. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104- February 8, 1996 recommended adoption of portions of the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991/NCR Standards, and in August of 1996, the FCC did adopt the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1992 two tier Standards, implemented for all applications submitted beginning September 1, 1997. The attached photograph indicating acceptable EMF emissions from various household appliances provides a further perspective for better understanding the EMF levels encountered in this summary. For additional information addressing the environmental impact of EMF Emissions please refer to the section in the report titled "References" which provides current names of agencies, contact personnel and phone numbers. U References for EMR recommended ceilings, data and comments to radiation sources, radiation hazards and available reports on studies of household appliances emitting electromagnetic radiation: Summary of International, Federal, State and Consensus Safety Criteria For Exposure to Radio Frequency Energy at Frequencies Used for PCS Communications Organization/Government Agency Exposure Power Population Density (gW/cm sq.) International -World Occupational 4,875 Health Organization-(EHC 137, 1993) Public 975 Intemational -National Radiological Occupational 10,000 Protection Board (NRPB, 1993) Public 10,000 International -European Prestandard Occupational 4,875 (CENELEC ENV.50166-2, 1995 Public 975 Federal -Federal Communications Commission (follows NCRP- 1986) Occupational 5,000 Public 1,000 Consensus Standards American National Standards Institute Occupational 5,000 (ANSI C95.1 - 1982) Public 5,000 ANSI & Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 Occupational 6,500 Public 1,300 National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements (NCRP Report 86,1986) Occupational 5,000 Public 1,000 State Codes New Jersey (NJAC 7:28-42) Public 5,000 Massachusetts (Dept. of Health, 105 CMR 122) Public 1,000 New York State (Dept. of Health follows NCRP-86 Public 1,000 V RESUME NAME: Louis G. Comacchia STATUS: Married, Four Children EDUCATION: Manhattan College, BEE Iona College, Computer Language Courses Manhattanville college, Business Law Courses PRESENT: Charger Tech Services Ins./SCINETICS Corporation - President Engineering Consultants with Micro wave/Wireless Industry. Mr. Comacchia has been employed in the Electronics Industry as Electronic Engineer after receiving his BEE from Manhattan College, School of Engineering. Prior to forming Collins Consultants Int'l in 1969 and subsequently Charger Tech Services Inc. in 1974, Mr. Comacchia was employed by Hazeltine Electronics Corp. as Engineer, Designing Signal Processor and Radar Display Module for The SAGE System, Primary Early Warning System or DEW LINE, the TPS-1-GROUND BASED SEARCH RADAR SYSTEM and AWACS (A6E) RF/Power Systems. Subsequently, Lou was employed by Loral Systems Design Team developing the AN/ALQ58 Reconnaissance System and developed (two man team) the precursor YIG TUNER - [ALR-20] Crystal Scanner covering the full 200 megahertz - 12 gigahz Frequency Range Surveillance System for interception of Enemy Navigational Fire Control and Homing Devices for purposes of Identification and Signal Jamming for a specific bomber. Seven years after receiving his degree Mr. Cornacchia was hired as Chief Engineer by Victory Electronic to Develop the Image Intensifier or Night Vision Scopes (Using Star Light) for the Fort Dix Army Command including development of a short circuit proof magnetic amplifier for a tank turret driver. At Norden Systems, Mr. Cornacchia developed unique, more aggressive programs incorporating Built-In Test Equipment (BITE) to detect on-coming cimuit failures of the Fl 11D-E Avionics to increase reliability and was responsible for presentation of same to Air Force procurement Officer and change of Automatic Test Equipment Mil Specifications to accommodate this innovation. W In 1969 Collins Consultants Int'l, LTD was formed to continue servicing Norden Systems in developing Automatic Test Programs for AIRBORNE Computers and Navigational Radar Modules. In 1974 Charger Tech Services, a New York Corporation was formed by Comacchia (President), with Mr. Robert Harris to service additional companies in both the Defense Industry and the Nuclear and Industrial communities on an Engineering level. In 1987 SCINETICS was formed by Mr. Comacchia (President), and application for a service mark was filed with the United States Patent Office, and granted. As of July 1990, SCINETICS Corporation assumed responsibilities for Mobile Cellular and PCS FCC EMF Compliance analysis, Intermodulation studies, RF/EMF Site studies and Site propagation analysis. A partial listing of companies SCINETICS and Charger has been contracted with, employing state of the art Engineers, Technicians and Programmers, are as follows: Port Authority NY/NJ Airborne Instruments Labs United Technologies Northrop Grumman Verizon Wireless AT&T Wireless Sirius Satellite Radio Loral Electronics Systems Cingular ITT New York Telephone Co. Sprint / Nextel Fairchild Camera Div. Shore Media Inc. T-Mobile Syracuse Scientific Corp. IBM Fox News Martin Marietta Allied Signal - Bendix Mobile Radio Cellular EMF Studies and Testimonies Provided by Scinetics for the following Communities. Case law decisions* favoring Applicant, where SCINETICS Corp. was mentioned as providing Critical written technical support data and Expert testimony in applicant's application process. (Partial Listing): Hillsborough, New Jersey New York City, NY Martinsville, NJ Readington, NJ* Uniondale, NY Valley Cottage, New York Hastings, New York Little Silver, NJ* Garwood, New Jersey* Armonk, New York Fair Lawn, New Jersey* Bedminster, N J Hazlet, New Jersey* Dix Hills, NY Bayville, NY Jurisdictions in Nassau and Suffolk Counties in which Lou Comacchia has provided expert testimony and has been qualified as an expert witness: Towns: Hempstcad, New York Babylon, New York Riverhead, New York Oyster Bay, New York Islip, New York Southold, New York Huntington, New York Brookhaven, NY Southampton, NY X Cities: Glen Cove, New YorkLong Beach, New York Villages: Cedarhurst, New York Hempstead Village, NY Malveme, New York Munsey Park, New York Valley Stream, New York Northport, New York East Hills, New York Lawrence, New York Matinecock, New York Muttontown, New York Amityville, New York Patchogue, New York Freeport, New York Lynbrook, NY Mineola, NY Rockville Centre, NY Lloyd Harbor, NY Port Jefferson, NY OTHER ACTIVITIES: School Board President - New Rochelle, New York. Finance Campaign Manager - Mayoral Campaign, New Rochelle, New York. SDA District Chairman - Boy Scouts of America, New Rochelle, New York. Chairman- Board of Directors -Reliance Bank, White Plains, New York -USA Bank, Portchester, NY Member of Advisory Board of Patriot National Bank Stamford, Connecticut Member of Board of Directors, Axonyx Corp. Licensed Real Estate Broker State of New York and State of Connecticut iFigureA Figure I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R (' H I ] E ( T S , 1, L P Partners William F. Collins, AIA Steven R. Saraniero, AIA Nell A MacDonald, AIA, LEED AP Parmer, Emeritus Thomas R. Turkel, AIA Director of Planning Gary S. Shumway Associate Paul lC Gar telmann, AIA, LEED AP ENGINEERING REPORT THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 PREPARED FOR: SEI'AIIKEI, N~ 11~33 Pll: 631-689 8450 Northeast LLC LI13807C PROJECT NO. 07-7199 JANUARY 11,2010 Revised FEBRUARY 22, 2010 I I T-Mobile Northeast LLC (L113807C THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURC}I OF CUTCHOGUE) 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 William F Collins, AIA Architects, LLP WFC Project # 07-7199 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SITE EVALUATION CERTIFICATION RESUME APPENDIX A. Site Plan B. Elevation C. Audible Sound Level Chart D. Antenna Spec E. Battery Cabinet Specification (LI13807C THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE) 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 2/19/10 1 2 3 4 I I I T-Mobile Northeast LLC (L113807C THE PRESBYTERIAN CItURCH OF CUTCHOGUE) 27245 Main Road, Culchogue, NY 11935 William F Collins, AIA Architects, LLP WFC Pro)ect # 07-7199 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2/22/10 INTRODUCTION The Construction Documents and Zoning Drawings for this Communication Facility were prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP (WFC) of 12-1 Technology Drive, Setauket, New York 11733. The plans are titled "Construction Documents for Cellular Communications Equipment Site No. Ll13807C THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE) 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935". WFC has prepared the Construction Documents and Zoning Drawings to depict T-Mobile's proposed installation of four (4) antenna sectors, each sector to consist of (2) antennas, for a total of eight (8) antennas. The site is located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935. The property is a polygonal shaped parcel and is approximately 39,725 square feet (0.91 acres). The subject parcel contains an existing one story masonry building and adjacent parking lot. All the proposed eight (8) antennas discussed above will be mounted within the existing church steeple. Select portions of the existing steeple are to be removed and replaced with the proposed RF compatible concealment material to match the existing steeple conditions. Four (4) of the proposed antennas will be installed with the centerline height at approximately 47'-4" AGL and four (4) at approximately 54'-4" AGL. T-Mobile proposes to install seven (7) pieces of equipment consisting off (2) equipment cabinets, (1) battery cabinet, (1) PPC cabinet, (1) UMTS cabinet and (2) booster cabinets, on a proposed 5'-0" x 27'-1" poured concrete equipment pad. The proposed equipment area is to be located on the northwest side of the building on the ground level. The equipment area will be surrounded by 6fl high white vinyl fence with two 21 '~5" sliding gates and (12) arborvitae. In addition, one (1) Global Positioning Satellite Unit (GPS) will be mounted on the equipment cabinet. The outdoor battery cabinet enclosure and all the components, as indicated on the Zoning Drawings, meet the certification standards of UL, KEMA and/or NEBS. The cabinet is meant for outdoor use only and is fully ventilated. Moreover, the battery cabinet is designed to prevent the buildup of fumes." Additionally, the unit is equipped with a drip pan for additional protection. (See attachment 5) This location has thc possibility for a future carrier installation, as depicted on the Zoning Drawings. This report can not address a future unknown carrier and can not speculate on equipment which may be installed. Each of the known carriers may utilize a variety of equipment types. Specific information would be required from the carrier regarding the antenna type and proposed equipment. (LI13807C THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUICIIOGUE) 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, N y 11935 I I T-Mobile Northeast LLC (LI13807C THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE) 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY I 1935 William F Collins, AIA Architects, LLP WFC Project # 07-7199 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE SITE EVALUATION The T-Mobile Communication Facility is designed to meet or exceed the requirements of the Building Code of New York State, as well as the Town of Southold Zoning Ordinance. According to T-Mobile's Health and Safety Report, T-Mobile's antennas and equipment will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of surrounding properties, nor will the safety, health, and welfare of the surrounding community be adversely affected. The proposed cell site is an unmanned Communication Facility. Once every 4-6 weeks a technician in a passenger car will come to the site to do a diagnostic test to evaluate the network. As such, there will be no increase of vehicular traffic on public roads within the Town. Public facilities, such as electric and telephone facilities are already in the area and are deemed adequate to serve the subject facility. Because T-Mobile's Communication Facility is unmanned, there will be no impact on public or private facilities for treatment, removal, or discharge of sewage, refuse, or other effluent. Furthermore, all materials used in the construction of T-Mobile's Communication Facility will be in accordance with local building codes and will be subject to building department reviews and approvals. Them will not be any disturbance to adjacent properties due to dust, obnoxious gasses, odors, smoke, soot, vibration, noise, etc. T-Mobile's Communication Facility will be accessed from the existing site access point and, as such, there will be no need to establish new driveways in connection with the Communication Facility. In summary, there will not be any hazard to life, limb, or property resulting from the erection and installation of T-Mobile's antennas and equipment. Further, the site is suitable for such use based on bulk area requirements of the Town and existing conditions in the area. (LII3807CTHEPRESBYTERIANCIIURCHOFCUTCHOGUE 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 I I I T-Mobile Northeast LLC (LI13807C TItE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGU E) 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 William F Collins, AIA Architects, LLP WFC Project # 07-7199 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE CERTIFICATION This report was prepared as a result of a contractual agreement between T-Mobile and William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP, and is for the use o£ T-Mobile's agents and attorneys. William F. Collins, A1A, Architects, LLP does not accept any responsibility for this report if used by any other person, or persons, for any use other than for which this report is intended. This reposes prepared under the supervision of Paul K. Gartelmann, AIA, LEED AP. Paul K. Gartelmann, AIA, LEED AP January 11, 2010 (Lll3807C THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE) 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 I I I I I I I I I I RESUME: TITLE: FIRM: YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: ACCREDITATIONS / CERTIFICATIONS: Paul K. Gartelmann, AIA, LEED AP Associate William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP 10-1 Technology Drive Setauket, New York 11733 27 years in Architecture Telecommunications Infrastructures, Commercial, Educational, Industrial, Institutional, Medical, Senior Housing, Residential Bachelor of Science Architectural Technology Cum Laude Honors Graduate New York Institute of Technology May 1982 New York State Registered Architect- 1989 LEED AP (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) USGBC I I I I I I I I i EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS: As an Associate with the firm of William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP (WFC), Mr. Gartelmann directly supervises a complete staff of interdisciplinary design professionals and serves as a primary point of contact for several of the firm's key clientele. Mr. Gartelmann has acquired extensive experience in the highly specialized design and development of unmanned mobile communication sites for several regional carriers, helping to maintain the firm's standing as an industry leader in providing Architectural and Engineering services to the telecommunications sector. Having designed over 250 sites with direct involvement in many others for T-Mobile / Voicestream / Omnipoint, Nextel Communications, Verizon Wireless, Sprint PCS, AT&T Wireless Services, and Northcoast Communications, Mr. Gartelmann's expertise in this field is well documented and respected. Other experience includes planning, design, and preparation and review of construction documents and specifications for commercial office buildings, corporate interiors, medical office buildings and facilities including radiology, invetm fertilization, and ambulatory surgery facilities, residence health care facilities, assisted living senior residences, manufacturing facilities, and single family residences in either new construction or alterations of existing structures. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS: · Member of the American Institute of Architects (Past member o£the Board of Directors Long Island Chapter AIA) · Member ofthe Design Professional's Coalition of Long Island (Member of the Board of Directors and Past President) · United States Green Building Council (USGBC) I VICIN~ PLAN · T...Mobile. i ~ SP-1 =, m m m m m= m m =, m =m m m mm m =m m m m · T. · -Mobile. ~'~' SP4 74-'-2" 1 MAGNETEK 1 UMTS &: 2 S12000 61.18 dBA 56.18 dBA 57.95 dBA i I 6O NORMAL CONVERSATION, SEWING MACHINE '!1]1: I~I,H;::]/h'I'I:ILI\% ('Iii [I('1 (31' (t ]( riO(, ,, · T...Mobile- Northeast LLC T BXX-6516-R2M Decibel® ANDREWl, +45 Dual Band Quad Antenna Base Station Antennas Frequency Range (MHz): 1710-2155 Character st c mpedance (Ohms) 50 I S evation BW Deg): 7.2 · 1.2 ~ dBi 17 5 ~ 0 8 Gain ( ). 17.~ 0.8 [ Polarization: ~ ............ ~ .. ~:~ Front-to-Back Ratio (dB) Copol, t80° ~30': >~24 >24 >~ >24 I Tnt~lPnw~r 180~30~' ~4 >23 >2~ >23 ~ Electnca 't Range (Deg). 2~~[~ E ectr cai Oownt t Accuracy (Oeg)~ Cross-poi (dB) 3dBBeamwidth: >13 >13 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~ Intermodulation Products (dBc) ~ 3rd Order, 2 x 20 Watts: 155 ~ ~.'~ ~:~. Max. Input Power (Watts). 250 1 Lightning Protection'. DC G~ I ElCt Accuracy (Oeg) 1 (b~ee~n~ frequncy .... III ~nH~v n~Jr~: 11.5 I ~~: 1499 x 302 x 160 mm (~) 59 x 11.9 ~.3 inch MCea (m= I ~ 0.27 / 2.9 M¢~d (N / Ib~: 729.4 / 164 C~pe: 7-16 DIN, Female (4) Color: OffWhite . _ ~~m: TM600899A-2 Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.688.0089 11t27/2006 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tek 1.800.676.5342 Page 1 of 3 Richardson, Texas U.SA 755082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229 4706 dbtech~andrew corn Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew corn Information cor¢eot et date of issue bd may be subjec~ ~o change without notice. MAG N e~e~ ~! f,) (C) Nt N4 C) f'~ F~ () VV :: I I I Spectrum Series MPE5566 Battery Backup Enclosure Installation and Product Manual I I I I I I I I I I I I Product Manual N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Manual Number: MA013546 March 2004, Issue 2 © Magnetek, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual Product Manual N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Manual Number: MA013546 March 2004, Issue 2 Spectrum Series MPE5566 Battery Backup Enclosure Installation and Product Manual Notice: Every effort was made to ensure that the information in this document was complete and accurate at the time of printing. However, information is subject to change. Magnetek assumes no responsibility for any errors that may appear in this document. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 2 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ 5 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 5 2. TECHNICAL SUPPORT CONTACTS ...................................................................................................... 6 USA ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 PROD UCT REPAIR AND RETURN ................................................................................................... 6 RECTIFIER TROUBLESHOOTING ................................................................................................... 6 3. SAFETY - AGENCY CERTIFICATIONS ................................................................................................ 6 4. PHYSICAL SPECIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................. 7 5. INSTALLATION .......................................................................................................................................... 9 INSTALLATION GUIDES ................................................................................................................... 9 INSTALLATION PROCEDURE .......................................................................................................... 9 BATTER ¥ INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS ................................................................................ 11 6. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 12 7. AC INPUT ................................................................................................................................................... 13 RECOMMENDED CABLE SIZES (BASED ON MAXIMUM LOADS) .......................................... 1.3 8. DC DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................................................. 15 9. ALARM CONNECTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 15 10. CONTROLLER FEATURES .................................................................................................................. 17 II. RECTIFIER SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................ 18 12. SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 22 13. SAFETY STATEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 22 PERSONAL SAFETY. ......................................................................................................................... 2.3 14. RECEIVING INSTRUCTIONS ............................................................................................................... 23 HANDLING OF RECTIFIERS .......................................................................................................... 24 15. PROCEDURE TO REMOVE RECTIFIER/CONTROLLER ............................................................ 25 16. PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 26 RECTIFIER STORA GE. ..................................................................................................................... 26 RECTIFIER MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 26 ENCLOSURE MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................ 26 17. ENCLOSURE GROUNDING ................................................................................................................... 27 APPENDIX A: INSTALLATION MOP ....................................................................................................... 29 MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 3 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 1. In oduc6on General Information The N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 is a battery backup enclosure that supports -48-Volt DC telecommunications applications that require battery backup housed within a single environmentally controlled enclosure. It uses the Magnetek Spectrum Series MPE5566 enclosure, which is equipped with (2) 23" racks for the installation of both Magnetek and customer equipment. The system described in this manual is powered by (1) Magnum Series, MG4850 (48V/50A), 3000W rectifier, and as configured, is a 50A system that provides power to recharge the battery plant. An additional MG4850 rectifier may be added to provide up to 100A of power. This particular configuration is equipped with (6) battery trays (without batteries) for backup, and optional disconnect breakers per string. This environmentally controlled enclosure is cooled with an HVAC unit that controls the humidity and temperature from the outside environment. In addition, this HVAC unit is equipped with a heater assembly to keep the batteries in optimum condition in cold climates. This enclosure is also equipped with an optional sun shield. Powering the enclosure are Magnetek Magnum MG4850 (48V/50A), 3000W rectifiers that are designed to convert commercial 176-264 volts AC input power at 50 or 60 hertz into a highly regulated and filtered, low-noise, -48 volt DC output for telecommunications equipment loads. In this application, as in most telecommunications applications, the output of the rectifier system is electrically connected in parallel with the batteries. These rectifiers provide the power for charging the batteries. In the event ora commercial AC power failure, the batteries supply the required DC power to the customer's telecommunications equipment in the enclosure. Upon AC failure, contactors will close and connect the batteries to the customer's load. This system requires the customer's base stations to have a small battery plant to maintain power during contact closure. Application Description PRODUCT DESCRIPTION MODEL / SCHEMATIC NUMBER · MPE5566: I MG4850 (50A), 6 Battery Trays w/o Batteries N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 (A013546) e/w Batlery Disconnect Breakers and Enclosure Sun Shield Described in this manual · MPE5566: I MG4850 (50A), 4 Battery Trays w/o Batleries N3R48-4XG170ME50B6 (A013545) e/w Battery Disconnect Breakers and Enclosure Sun Shield I I I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 5 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 2. Technical Support Contacts USA During the warranty period, our Technical support telephone number is 1-800-443-4742 (press 3), and provides coverage during normal business hours (8:00 am - 5:00 pm M-F CST). Product Specialists are available to answer your technical questions and assist in troubleshooting problems. For after-hours EMERGENCIES, call 1-800-203-1098, which will page a service technician, who will contact the customer within 1 hour. Product Repair And Return For information regarding products needing repair, customers may call 1-800-443-4742 (press 3), to arrange for shipment and obtain an RMA number for tracking purposes. In case of EMERGENCY, replacements can be sent overnight or arrangements can be made in most cases for a drop delivery. Rectifier Troubleshooting Refer to the rectifier manual (included with the enclosure documentation package) for all rectifier-troubleshooting issues. 3. Safety - Agency Certifications The following safety certifications apply to the N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 enclosure and its components. Magnum MG4850 (3000W) Rectifier · CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 950-95 listed · KEMA certified per IEC 950 and EN 60950 · NEBS Level 3 certified Magnum MG4850 Rectifier Shelf · Designed to meet UL 60950 and NEBS Level 3 PSC500 Controller · Designed to meet UL 60950 Spectrum Series MPE5566 Enclosure · Designed to meet UL 60950 and NEMA 3R · Seismic Zone 4 certified per Telcordia GR-63-CORE Section 5.4.1 · All components used, including batteries, are UL recognized components MA013546-1ssue2.doc 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z Page 6 of 32 I I I N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 4. Physical Specifications I I I I · Height 55 in. (1397 mm.) · Height including optional base 66 in. (1676.4 mm.) · Width 66 in.(1676.4 mm.) · Depth 30in. (762 mm.) · Depth with AC unit mounted on the front door 37 in. (939.8 mm.) · Weight (Empty w/o skid) 390 lbs (176.9 Kg.) · Weight equipped w/o batteries (w/o skid) 700 lbs (317.5 Kg.) · Weight fully equipped with batteries (w/o skid) 4770 lbs. (2163.6 Kg.) I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-1:N3R48-6XGI70MESOB6 Drawing (48V50A, 6 Battery String Application) AIR CON[ 30 I MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 7 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual Figure 4-2:N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Enclosure e/w (1) 50-Ampere Rectifier TYPICAL 4,000 BTU HVAC UNIT e/w 470W HEATER IS ATTACHED TO THE FRONT DOOR OR LEFT SIDE MAGNETEK MAGNUM MG4850 RECTIFIER (I SUPPLIED) INTERNAL CABLE ENTRANCE (IN LOWER LEFT FRONT AREA) EXTERNAL CABLE ACCESS HOLES; REMOVABLE PLATES, I PER SIDE (4 TOTAL) PSC500 CONTROLLER AC INPUT CONNECTIONS OPTIONAL 100A BATTERY DISCONNECT BREAKERS (6 EACH) OPTIONAL BATTERY RESERVE, SHOWN WITH NORTHSTAR 170AH BATTERIES: (6-STRINGS) 8 HOURS ~ 126.6A 4 HOURS ~ 224.4A 2 HOURS ~ 402.6A I HOUR ~716.4A MA013546-Issue2.doc Page 8 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XG 170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 5. Installation Installation Guides This manual provides the necessary requirements for proper installation of the N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 enclosure. In addition, a Magnum rectifier shelf manual and a PSC500 controller user's guide are included as part of the standard documentation package provided with this enclosure. Installation Procedure Transportation and Enclosure Handling The N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 enclosure is packaged and shipped bolted to a wooden pallet. When transporting the N3R48-6XG170ME50B6, it must be secured to the truck with straps. The N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 enclosure is equipped with (2) rectangular slots just above the base that allow it to be lifted with either a forklift truck or crane (using a sling), per Figure 4-2. The lifting vehicle must be suited to the size and weight characteristics of this enclosure and proper safety guidelines must be followed. Enclosure Grounding/Master Ground Bar (MGB) As shipped, the DC positive terminal (on a ~[8Vdc system) is tied to the MGB as is AC input ground and the enclosure frame. The customer must connect the ground field ring to the master ground bar. Care must be taken not to connect anything between the negative and positive battery busses and / or the enclosure in order to prevent any potential arcing fi'om occurring. Enclosure Mounting The N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 is equipped with a pedestal that has (6) holes in the bottom of it for mounting this enclosure, per the mounting template in Figure 5-1 on the next page. Magnetek recommends the use of all (6) mounting holes in Seismic Zone 4 applications. Cable Entry The N3R48-6XG 170ME50B6 enclosure is equipped with removable panels on all (4) sides of the pedestal for cable entry (4 total), per Figure 5-1, next page. There is a large hole in the left, front inside bottom area of the enclosure (in front of the AC input connections) that provides the access into the enclosure itself, per Figure 4-2. MAI) 13546-1ssue2.doc Page 9 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual Figure 5-1:N3R48-6XG170MESOB6 Enclosure Mounting Template I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 65,25 7.25 -' GG ~ 30 ~ - 30 3 22.5 30 1" HOLES (6) TO SUIT SIT[ 26 1~12 ~C~ A013546 I 1 MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 10 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual Battery Installation Instructions The battery trays within this enclosure are designed and equipped to accommodate (4) 170Ah front terminal batteries manufactured by either NorthStar Battery Company (P/N NSB170FT) or Battery Corp. (P/N BC-12V170 FT). From the Magnetek factory, these battery trays are setup for the NorthStar NSB 170FT batteries. NOTE: If any other manufacturer's batteries are used in the MPE5566 enclosure, please call Magnetek for installation details and instructions ( 1-800-443-4742). For installation of the NorthStar NSB170FT batteries: 1. Remove the top and front battery brackets. 2. Carefully install (4) batteries into the battery tray and attach the cables provided. 3. Reinstall the top and front battery brackets as originally equipped. For installation of the Battery Corp. BC~I2V170 FT batteries: 1. Remove the top and front battery brackets. 2. Carefully install (4) batteries into the battery tray and attach the cables provided using the special adapter bars and hardware (provided in the hardware box in the bottom of enclosure). 3. For all battery trays, install the plastic spacers (provided in the hardware box) behind the front brackets to accommodate for the extra battery length. 4. For the (2) top battery trays only, move the top brackets down (1 slot on the bracket) before reattaching them, so they fit close to the top of the batteries. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 11 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 6. System Description The N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 enclosure accepts alternating current from the commercial utility or a standby AC power source and rectifies it to produce the DC power used to supply the DC load and charge the batteries. In addition the system provides over current protection and charge, discharge protection. The battery reserve automatically provides a source of DC power if the commercial or standby AC fails. AC Input connects the commercial and/or standby AC power sources to the rectifiers within the system and provides over-current protection (intemal panel). AC Distribution Panel distributes the AC power to the required equipment within the enclosure (internal panel). Rectifiers (Magnum MG4850) convert an AC source voltage into the -48Vdc voltage level required to charge / float the batteries. Batteries provide the energy storage for the uninterrupted power feed to the using equipment during a loss of AC input or rectifier failure. Valve regulated lead acid (VRLA) batteries rated up to 170AH should be used in this application. (The batteries are optional equipment, not included in this application). Battery Disconnect Breakers (100A) provide for disconnection of each individual battery string for battery maintenance purposes. (These breakers are included in this application). DC Distribution Panel provides over-current protection, connection points for the using equipment and bus bars used to interconnect the rectifiers, batteries, and DC distribution. The distribution breakers are alarmed. Low Voltage Disconnect protects the batteries from damage when the system is on battery power by disconnecting the batteries from the loads if the battery voltage drops below 42 Vdc. Temperature Control: Cooling is typically provided by a 4,000 BTU air conditioner, which is also equipped with a 470W heater. Controller: The PSC500 controller provides valuable site information including DC power system control, alarm and metering. Sun Shield reduces the sun's heat load on the enclosure. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 12 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 7. AC Input The recommended AC service is 120/240 Vac single-phase, connected inside the enclosure to terminal block TB1, which is protected by either a 60A or 80A main circuit breaker (CB1), depending on the options ordered. [NOTE: Verify that the power feeder measures 120/240Vac]. Them are internal AC feeder breakers that supply power to the rectifier shelf(CB2: 40A), the air conditioner (CB3: 20A) and if ordered, the optional GFI outlet / light feature (CB4: 20A). All of these AC breakers are attached to a din rail which is mounted inside the AC section (upper part) of the AC / DC distribution box (left side of enclosure), see Figure 7-1 on the next page. Table 7-1:N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Enclosure AC Input Connections · Voltage 120/240 Vac · Phase Single · Frequency 47-63 Hz · Acceptable Rectifier Input Voltage 176 - 264 Vac · Maximum lnput Current per Rectifier < 20 Amps [Input to the rectifier is protected by an internal breaker.] · Recommended Power Feeder Size 60A or 80A (depending on options) · AC Feeder Input Connections Terminal Block TB1 (N, L1 & L2) Connect Ground to MGB · Acceptable Wire Gage (TBI) # 2/0 to 12 AWG · Air Conditioner lnput Voltage 230Vac +/- 10% (If input is 120/208 Vac, external transformer is required for AC input to provide 230 Vac -> to be provided at site by customer) I I I I I I I I I I I I I Recommended Cable Sizes (Based on Maximum Loads) The table below lists the recommended cable sizes, based on the designed maximum loads, for both the AC feeder and DC load cables. Table 7-2:N3R48-6XG170MESOB6 Recommended Cable Sizes 70 Amp DC Load ~ 50 Feet 70 Amp DC Load ~ 25 Feet 70 Amp DC Load ~ 15 Feet 60 Amp AC Feeder Cable Use #1 Cable Use #4 Cable Use #6 Cable Use #6 Cable MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 13 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual Figure 7-1:N3R48-6XGI70MESOB6 Enclosure's AC / DC Distribution Panel AC PANEL (CB1-CB3. k, ] BATTERY DISTRIBUTION ~ PANEL BiS LOAD B~AKERS (CB5-CB7) , (A2TB4) 8TS LOAD CONNECTIONS (A2TB 1-3) PSC500 CONTROLLER I I I MASTER GROUND BAR AC INPUT CONNECTIONS (TB 1: N, L I 8,: L2) I I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 14 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual & DCDistribution The DC distribution (lower part of AC / DC distribution box) is equipped with (3) 100-Ampere breakers (CB5-CB7) to provide BTS load disconnects, (3) 10-Ampere breakers (CB8-CB 10) for customer equipment, and (3) DC terminal blocks (A2TB 1 - TB3) to connect the BTS loads to batteries (Figure 7-1). The PSC500 controller is mounted in this panel as well. The DC distribution is also equipped with a battery plant isolation contactor system, which includes (3) contactors that are normally open and allow the system to operate on AC power. If AC power is lost, the contactors close and put the batteries on-line to provide power for the customer's loads. If the system is on battery power and the battery levels drop below 42 Vdc, the LVDC (low voltage disconnect) opens the (3) main contactors, as well as a fourth contactor to shed the load connected to the (3) 10A breakers so that battery damage is prevented. Table 8-1:N3R48-6XG170MESOB6 Enclosure Load Distribution Connections · Load Distribution Connections -> See Figure 7-1 Terminal Block (A2) TB 1-3 · Acceptable Wire Gage (A2TB1-3) # 2/0 to 12 AWG · Auxiliary Load Connections -> See Figure 7-1 Terminal Block (A2) TB4 · Recommended Wire Gage (A2TB4) 12 AWG e/w Ring Lug I I I I I I I I I I 9. Alarm Connections The following table describes all of the alarm connections for the N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 enclosure as well as the thermostat settings. The thermostats used in this enclosure are fixed, and the standard factory preset values are listed in the right hand column. Alarms noted with an (*) can be accessed via the TB2 terminal block or via the PSC500, in which case TB2 must not be connected. Table 9-1:N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Enclosure Alarm Connections Air Conditioner thermostat Heater thermostat (within the Air Conditioner) DC Distribution Alarms (*) · AC Fail Alarm(*) · Open Door Alarm · LVD (low voltage) Alarm Auxiliary Alarm Inputs (Customer Defined) 7 Auxiliary Alarm Outputs (Customer Defined) Acceptable Wire Gage All Alarms Preset at factory to 75°F (adjustable) Fixed: Opens ~ 60°F and closes ~ 40°F TB2 (terminals 23 & 24) -> Direct Connect or PSC500 Alarm Input When Equipped TB2 (terminals 13 & 25) -> Direct Connect or PSC500 Alarm Input When Equipped Configurable Alarm Input #0 via PSC500 Configurable Alarm Input #1 via PSC500 Configurable Alarm Inputs #2 & 3 via PSC500 Terminal Block TB3 (terminals 1-2 & 3-4) Configurable Alarm Outputs via PSC500 Terminal Block TB2 (terminals 1-14) 18 - 20 AWG e/w Ring Lug I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 15 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual Figure 9-1:N3R48-6XG170MESOB6 Enclosure's Customer Alarm Connections TB2 ALARM CONNECTIONS I I I I I I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 16 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 10. Controller Features This enclosure is equipped with a PSC500 controller, which is installed in the AC / DC distribution panel. It is a modular central office and remote site power system controller designed to provide valuable site information including DC power system control, alarm and metering. The remote access capabilities of the PSC500 provide secure access to the customer's site via Ethernet and TCP / IP. The PSC500 controller monitors and controls the operation of the DC power system's rectifier(s) via analog or digital interface and is also used to remotely monitor other vital site equipment such as batteries, generators, transmission equipment, HVAC, tower lights and site security. Following are the PSC500 features included in this application: · User friendly, web based screens for system setup, test and monitoring. · Float and boost modes · Alarm detection and distribution via relays and SNMP traps · System voltage and temperature monitoring · Four supervised, digital, user definable inputs · Remote network interface via Ethernet TCP/IP · SNMP and HTTP access capability · Front panel volt and current test points · Rectifier communication via analog or digital interface · Battery discharge test · Battery runtime monitor (uses external battery current shunt) · Emailnotification on alarm · Rectifier current monitoring (uses external current shunt) · Temperature compensation with midpoint alarm (midpoint alarm is only available on 1 battery string) -> If this enclosure is not factory equipped with batteries, the temperature compensation cable needs to be terminated to the positive terminal of BTT18 whenever the batteries are installed (refer to the schematic drawing enclosed with this manual). Following are the PSC500 optional features not included in this application: · LCD (standard on PSC500-H model) For more details regarding the features and alarm inputs / outputs, refer to the PSC500 user's guide included with this enclosure. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 17 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 11. Rectifier Specifications The N3R48-6XG 170ME50B6 enclosure is equipped with a two position Magnetek Magnum rectifier shelf to supply the power to the (1) Magnum MG4850 rectifier. Standard Rectifier Features 1. Output current "walk in" - This circuit allows the rectifier to slowly start to allow for start up to protect high current starts (built into rectifier). 2. Electronic Current Limit- Rectifiers current limits are limited to the amount of recharge current to the batteries during a power failure and restart (built into rectifier). 3. High Voltage Shutdown- The HVSD is internal of the rectifier and also adjustable through the controller. Table 11--1: Electrical Table For Magnum MG4850 Rectifier Parameters marked with (*) are programmable via a controller. INPUT · Voltage 176-264 Vac · Frequency 47-63Hz · Max Input Current <20 Arms · Maxlnrush Current 30 Apk · Power Factor .99 (above half load, 230Vac) · Turn on Delay (*) sec OUTPUT · Output Power ;000W · Output Current 50A (48V) · Load Regulation (0-100% Load) +/-0.4% · Line Regulation +/-0.4% (Min To Max Input Voltage) i· Transient Response <0.5 msec (10-100-10% Load Change) ~ Output PARD 200mVpk (48V); bw: 100MHz · Current Sharing Precision 2% (48V) 1 I 1 I I I I 1 MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 18 of 32 2004-03~05T00:00:00Z I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual · Current Limit (*) 105% of Nominal · Hold-Up Time Upon Loss of 20 msec, 176Vac, full load Input Power · Current Walk-In (*) >10 Sec (From 0 To Nominal Level) · Output Voltage Adjustment Range (*) 40-60 Vdc (Controller Adjustment) Equalizing Voltage (*) 56V Manual Adj.- (49.9-59.8Vdc) Floating Voltage (*) 54.4 Manual Adj. = (49.9-55.8Vdc) · Output Voltage Rise Time (*) 500 ms · Long Term Temperature Drift ,± 0.2%/Year I 1 I I I PROTECTION Input Eircuit Breaker · Input Surge Immunity Bellcore TR-TSY000947 · Over-Temperature (OT) Output is inhibited for duration of OT condition. OT Threshold = 110°C on most critical internal components Output · Over-voltage Protection. Latch up mode Catastrophic OV 55V (Catastrophic failure setting) First OV Threshold (*) 51.5V (default) · Fan Failure Alarm Output current limitation lowered to 50% · Over current and Short Circuit Protection (*) Uonstant current limitation EFFICIENCY 92% 48V 50A ENVIRONMENTAL · Operating Temperature (OT) Fully Operational 14°F to 140°F (-10°C to +60°C) Start up with LCD off -40°F to 14°F (-40°C to -10°C) · Storage Temperature -40°F to 185°F (-40°C to +85°C) · Operating Humidity :)-95%(Non Condensing) · Operating Altitude 13000 Ft. Per Bellcore · EMI FCC Class B, EN55022 Class B I I I I I I I I I I I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 19 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual I ESD Bellcore GR- 1089-Core, IEC- 1000-4-2 Bm's/Hour 3280 for all four rectifiers FL INDICATORS, CONTROLS, AND COMMUNICATIONS Indicators I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Output Current Output Voltage Rectifier On Rectifier Failure Fan Fail Over-Voltage (OV) Over-Temperature (OT) Controls Output voltage, Float and Equalize Voltage Current Limit Output voltage rise time First Over voltage Threshold Current Walk-ln Remote Communication Rectifier Failure Contacts and RS-485 Fan failure :ontacts and RS-485 Over-temperature Contacts and RS-485 Remote Diagnostics RS-485 port Test Points Output Voltage Output Current MULTIPLE UNH OPERATION Active Current Sharing Group Output Voltage Adjustment Via External Controller · Hot Swappable I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 20 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual · Group Temperature Compensated Via ExternalController Battery Charge AGENCY APPROVAL · EN 60950 · IEC60950 · CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 950-95 · NEBS Level 3 Certified MECHANICAL · Size · 10.51"H x 4.14"W x 14.97'D · Weight · 13.28 lbs (6.04 kgs) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NOTE: SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE The SwitchMode rectifiers are fully alarmed and operate in an active loop current sharing design. No regular checks or adjustments are necessary to maintain the operating parameters. The active power factor is >.99 with a high power density of >5.5W/inch3 with an efficiency of 92% ~ 48 volts. The unit has alarm LED's and test points on the front panel to visualize working conditions. The rectifiers am hot pluggable and operate in either a stand alone mode or with a controller. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 21 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 12. Safety Precautions Always take precautions to protect personal safety as well as the equipment when working on power systems. Throughout this manual and located on the equipment will be personal safety labels indicating DANGER or WARNINGS. Those relating to equipment damage are labeled Caution. Warning This unit has high leakage current. Earth connections are essential before ~/~ connections to the supply. //t/~ Read User's Guide - After installation, read the User's Guide carefully before operating. Follow all operating instructions carefully. //~ Power Sources - This product should be operated only from the type of sources indicated on the manufacture's ID label. Installation should be in compliance with applicable sections of the National Electric Code. //~ Ventilation - slots and openings in the cabinet are provided for ventilation and to ensure reliable operation of the product. To protect the unit from overheating, these openings must not be blocked or covered. This product should not be placed in a built-in installation, such as a wall cutout unless proper ventilation is provided. //t~ Cleaning - If it should become necessary to clean this equipment, disconnect the unit from its power source first. Do not use liquid cleaners, aerosols, abrasive pads, scouring powders or solvents, such as benzine or alcohol. Use a soft cloth lightly moistened with a mild detergent solution. Ensure the surface cleaned is fully dry before reconnecting the power. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 13. Safety Statements · For use in restricted access areas in accordance with articles I 10-16, 110-17, and 110-18 of the U.S. National Electric Code (NEC), ANSI/NFPA No. 70, and pursuant to applicable local codes. · AC branch circuits to this equipment must be protected with either fuses or circuit breakers sized as required by the National Electric Code (NEC) and/or local municipality codes. · For electrical connections requiring crimp-on lugs, make sure the proper crimping tools and dies are used. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 22 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I N3R48-6XG170MESOB6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual Personal Safety · Always observe precautions when working on or using this type of equipment. Use only properly insulated tools. Remove all metallic objects (key chains rings or other type jewelry. Wear safety glasses. Test circuits before touching. Lock out and tag any circuit breakers/fuses when possible to prevent accidental tum on. Identify exposed hazardous electrical potentials. * Use care when removing or replacing covers or contacting any live circuits. Requirement of two employees must be observed when working power. · If the DC positive is connected to the enclosure / earth ground, care must be taken not to short anything to the negative side of the batteries / enclosure in order to prevent any potential arcing from occurring. I I 14. Receiving Instructions Please Note: For your protection, the following information and the product manual should be read and thoroughly understood before unpacking, installing, or using the equipment. · Magnetek presents all equipment to the delivering carrier securely packed and in perfect condition. Upon acceptance of the package from us, the delivering carrier assumes responsibility for its safe arrival to you. Once you receive the equipment, it is your responsibility to document any damage the carrier may have inflicted, and to file your claim promptly and accurately. I I I I I I I I. Package Inspection 2. Equipment Inspection · Examine the shipping crate or carton for any visible damage: punctures, dents and any other signs of possible internal damage. · Describe any damage or shortage on the receiving documents and have the carrier sign their full name. Within fifteen days, open crate or carton and inspect the contents for damages. While unpacking, be careful not to discard any equipment, parts, or manuals. If any damage is detected, call the delivering carrier to determine the appropriate action. They may require an inspection. I i Save all shipping material for the inspector to see! · After the inspection has been made, call Magnetek. We will I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc determine if the equipment should be retumed to our plant for repair 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z Page 23 of 32 I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XG 170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual or if some other method would be more expeditious. If it is determined that the equipment should be returned to Magnetek, ask the delivering carrier to send the packages back to Magnetek at the delivering carrier's expense. If repair is necessary, we will invoice you for the repair so that you may submit the bill to the delivering carrier with your claim forms. It is your responsibility to file a claim with the delivering carrier. Failure to properly file a claim for shipping damages may void warranty service for any physical damages later reported for repair. Handling of Rectifiers Always handle the rectifiers with care. Do not drop or lean on front panel or connector. Keep away from moisture. 1. Nameplate Part number and serial number located on the nameplate identifies each piece of Magnetek's equipment. Please refer to this number in all correspondence with Magnetek. 2. Initial Settings All equipment is shipped from our production facility fully checked and adjusted. Do not make any adjustments until you have referred to the technical reference or product manual. · Checkthe flame ground for continuity. I WARNING -- Input power to the rectifier shelves is a hazardous voltage. Ensure power is de-energized prior to attempting any work. I I I Note: Always adhere to the National Electrical Code and all state, county, and local electrical codes when working with AC WARNING -- Inspect the AC Input Power Breaker and the DC Output Power Breaker. (See Fig. 5) Switch them to the OFF Position. Make sure they are in the OFF Position before installing the cabinet. 1 WARNING --The rectifier modules easily slide onto the shelf between the shelf rectifier guides. Excessive force or rough handling during installation could result in mechanical damage to the rectifier module I NOTE- The rectifiers are designed to be installed hot with no plant interruption. I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 24 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XG170MESOB6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual IF APPLICABLE - HOW TO INSTALL & TURN-UP RECTIFIERS: Remove the rectifiers from the shipping cartons. After unpacking all the rectifiers, remove all packaging materials from the site. (Boxes should be saved in case rectifiers should need to be returned.) · Verify that the rectifiers' power switches are in the STANDBY (UP) or off position prior to installing the rectifiers into the shelf. · Slide a rectifier slowly into the power shelf slot to be used for the rectifiers until the rectifier is firmly engaged into the shelf connector. · Tighten the locking knob(s) at the bottom of the rectifier front cover and engage the latch (if applicable) to secure the rectifier to the shelf. · Toggle the rectifiers' power switch to the NORMAL (DOWN) position to activate. For the Magnum (Enhanced) Series rectifiers only, turn on the AC power switch and then the DC power switch. · All rectifiers LED's except Rectifier's green led should be off. 15. Procedure to Remove Rectifier / Controller · Toggle the power switch to the STANDBY (UP) position (applies to rectifier only). For the Magnum (Enhanced) Series rectifiers only, turn offthe AC power switch and then the DC power switch. · Using the threaded knob(s) at the bottom of the rectifier / controller housing, turn counterclockwise so the maximum thread contact has been removed and disengage the latch (if applicable). · Pull the rectifier / controller firmly toward the front and remove from the shelf. · Care should be taken to not damage the rectifier / controller after removing from the shelf. · Obtain an RMA number from the technical representative for replacement or repair and return of the product. · NOTE: If the system is equipped with a controller and it is removed from the system, the rectifier(s) will go into default operation. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 25 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XG170MESOB6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 16. Preventative Maintenance Rectifier Storage Rectifiers operate longer if kept in a non-harmful environment. The rectifiers should be installed or stored in a location, which is dry, well ventilated, temperature controlled [39° to 100° F (4° to 38° C)] and free of obstructions. The MTBF on the rectifiers is 150,000 hours at 122°F (50°C). Rectifier Maintenance The recommended spare paris for the rectifier are limited to only the fans, which would only need replacing if the fan fails. All other rectifier components are not replaceable in the field and should only be updated at a Magnetek facility. All other paris within the power system are discrete components and do not require replacement unless they are damaged or become non-functional for the application. For fan replacement: 1. Remove the rectifier, and then remove the fan module appropriately. For Magnum models, the fans are mounted on the rear of the rectifier. 2. Use the following Magnetek replacement fans, based on the rectifier model number. [NOTE: For rectifier models that use (2) fans, both fans should be replaced at the same time]. RECTIFIER REPLACEMENT QUANTITY / DESCRIPTION MODEL NO. NUMBER RECTIFIER MG4850, 82119000008 2 Magnetek (NMB) Fan MG24100 Enclosure Maintenance Refer to GA-Enclosures manual included in the documentation package inside the enclosure for recommended enclosure preventative maintenance. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 26 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I N3R48-6XG170ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual 1 Z Enclosure Grounding Grounding design is required with the prime objective to hold all equipment at the same essential potential. The impedance should be designed for the lowest ground resistance to Earth ground. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Connections for the ACEG are located directly proportional to the Line input voltage and clearly marked. This connection should be made with compression type connections to assure proper grounding techniques to the AC input and Generator connections should also be common to the Enclosure being installed. Ring ground for the equipment requires a station ground electrode for all Radio equipment. The conductor that interconnects the driven rods should form a ring around the building. The exterior ring is used in conjunction with an inner ring ground system, the communications equipment internal of the enclosure. The power installed inside the enclosure is pre-wired and internally connected to the enclosure. Magnetek recommends that multiple bonds between the exterior and interior rings plus connections to any antenna towers and to individual metallic objects such as a fence surrounding the site be on a common plane, primarily for protection of personnel and equipment from lightning damage. The building external ground system consists of the building ground ring and all external objects shall be connected to it. (Fence, metal enclosures, etc...) the objective is to connect all components together with the least impedance between objects and to provide a path of least impedance from components to earth. Any surge that occurs will be quickly dissipated to earth with a minimum potential difference between compopents. The building external ground ring consists ora number of rods driven into the ground bonded together with wire forming a ring encircling the entire building. The connecting wire is made of#2 AWG, tinned, solid wire, annealed or semi-hard drawn commercial grade copper conductor buried at least 30 inches below grade and 24" from the exterior wall per NEC 1999, Article 250-50. The rods are 5/8" diameter, eight to ten feet long, copper clad or galvanized steel placed approximately one-rod length apart. Pigtail leads are not permitted from the primary connecting wire to the rods. Connect the primary connecting wire to the top of the ground rods. (See Figure 17-1) There should be only one ground system and separate rods not connected to the main system are not allowed. In all cases, the grounding rod will penetrate the frost line and reach permanent moisture in the soil. The grounding ring must also be below the frost line. If any rock is encountered when driving the ground rods it is permissible to drive the rods at up to a 45-degree angle from vertical. The grounding system shall not be installed with any sharp bends. Minimum bending radius shall be 8 inches. Larger bend radius shall be used where possible. Lightning MA013546-1ssue2.doc 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z Page 27 of 32 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MA013546-1ssue2.doc N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual prefers to follow a straight path and sharp bends in the conductor may allow the surge to exit and damage surrounding facilities or equipment. In areas where the ground system is greater than 5 Ohms, the company and Magnetek can develop a special grounding system. Isolated equipment grounding, if required, can have a counterpoise of three ground rods separated by 15 feet and shall be installed outside the building and brought inside using two 4/0 ground wires. FIGURE 1 7-1 2 AWG BARE CU WIRE EXOTHERMIC WELD ENCIRCLING BLDG. ]] BATTERY 24" MIN / ~ I~...J [ Moisture Line .~ . '8 Foot x 5/8" dia. steel, rod, gal, or plated one length apa~ All connectors, wiring, conduit, fixtures, etc., installed in the cabinet shall meet the requirements of the National Electric Code ~EC), (NEMA), (UL) and any local municipality requirements. Page 28 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N3R48-6XGI70ME50B6 Battery Backup Enclosure Manual APPENDIX A: INSTALLATION MOP BATTERY CABINET INSTALLATION METHOD OF PROCEDURE (MOP) Definitions of abbreviations used in this MOP: CEC - Customer Equipment Cabinets SDPP - Site Distribution Power Panel NOC - Network Operating Center 1. Locate the area to install the cabinet that does not interfere with future CEC installations. 2. Secure the battery cabinet to the pad / concrete / grating with redheads or other appropriate hardware. 3. Run minimum 1" EMT from the SDPP to the battery cabinet. 4. Run minimum 1" EMT from the battery cabinet to each CEC at the site. 5. The SDPP breaker should be sized per NEC code. 6. The AC wiring from the SDPP to the battery cabinet should be sized per NEC code. 7. The DC wiring from all CEC's to the battery cabinet should be sized per NEC code. 8. Load 1 is for the CEC #1 (main), load 2 is for CEC #2 and load 3 is for CEC #3. 9. Label the #6 battery leads at both ends for each load (1,2 and 3) 10. Tape or wire-nut the battery cabinet side of the #6 battery leads to prevent sparking once they are terminated at the CEC battery end. 11. Verify that all AC and DC breakers in the battery cabinet are open or off. 12. Call the NOC to notify them of your work; also let them know they will see a door alarm. 13. Terminate the cables, with the appropriate lugs, to the existing battery terminals. 14. Terminate the AC wiring from the SDPP to the battery cabinet before terminating the DC wiring. 15. Power up the battery cabinet at the SDPP breaker; then engage the AC and DC breakers on the inside of the battery cabinet. 16. Verify that there is no voltage at loads 1, 2 or 3. 17. Open or turn offthe main AC breaker in the battery cabinet. 18. Verify that there is approximately 54 VDC at loads 1, 2 or 3. 19. Turn off all AC and DC breakers in the battery cabinet. 20. Terminate the DC leads from the CEC's at load 1,2 and 3 respectively. 21. Turn all AC breakers back on inside the battery cabinet. 22. Make sure the air conditioning becomes operational within the battery cabinet. 23. Make sure the rectifiers are turned on. The green power light should be on, and the yellow current limit light should be on. The current limit light will go off once the batteries are fully charged. 24. Turn offthe power at the SDPP, and check to see if the CEC remains energized. 25. Place a test meter at the CEC battery leads and verify that there is 54 VDC. 26. Call the NOC to ensure there are no major alarms. 27. Turn the SDPP power back on. 28. Close all cabinets and lock appropriately. MA013546-1ssue2.doc Page 29 of 32 2004-03-05T00:00:00Z PLANN1NG BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application ofT-Mobile Northeast LLC, f/ka/a Omnipoint Communications, [nc., as Applicant, and the Presbyterian Church or Society of Cutchogue, as Owner for all necessary permits to construct, operateand maintain a public utility wireless communication facility located at: 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York known and designated as Suffolk County Property Tax Id. No.: District: 1000, Section: 102, Block: 1, Lot: 12 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.; SUPPLEMENTAL RADIO FREQUENCY MARIANA NIETO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer, employed by T-Mobile Northeast LLC f/k/a Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (hereinafter "T-Mobile"). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in wireless telephone network coverage and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna cell sites to remedy service deficiencies in wireless communications coverage. 2. I submit this supplemental affidavit in support of T-Mobile's special exception and site plan application (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Planning Board with respect to the construction of a public utility wireless communication facility (the "Communication Facility"), designed to remedy a deficiency in wireless telephone network coverage that exists in the Cutchogue area. 3. The proposed Communication Facility will be located at 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, known and designated as District 1000, Section 102, Block 1, Lot 12 (the "Site"). The proposed Communication Facility will consist of, among other things: (a) Four (4) sectors of public utility wireless communication antennas, two (2) antennas per sector (for a total of eight (8) antennas) mounted entirely within an RF compatible concealment material church steeple assembly, to match the existing steeple in all respects; (b) Seven (7) equipment cabinets mounted on a concrete slab, located to the northeast of the existing church; (c)One (1) global positioning satellite CGPS") antenna; and (d) All other appurtenances, structures, improvements, fencing, equipment, devices, cables, conduits and wires related thereto, as more fully set forth in the site plans submitted herewith. 4. T-Mobile is a public utility under the laws of the State of New York and it holds a license from the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to serve the public within the Town. T-Mobile's FCC license requires that it provide wireless telephone service within the geographic boundaries of the New York metropolitan area, which includes the Town. The regulatory mandate for this franchise is that T-Mobile provide a quality of service consistent with FCC requirements. 5. Mobile telephony is a method of communication by radio consisting of mobile units, either mounted in vehicles or hand-held, that transmit to and receive signals from fixed base cell sites. The base cell site connects the mobile telephone to the landline telephone network by sending signals within a small geographic area. The cell sites are designed to cover a small geographic area because mobile telephony utilizes low power and the frequencies licensed by the FCC are, generally, "line of sight." In addition, factors such as terrain, foliage and existing buildings can seriously impair/inhibit the signal strength, making the coverage irregular and unreliable. Therefore, it is necessary to locate base cell sites at predetermined locations and heights in order to provide a seamless and reliable grade of service to the public. 6. Seamless, reliable coverage is the ability of a customer to move from one cell to an adjacent cell, through a process called "hand-off", while carrying a call on the network. As a customer making a call in the vicinity of a cell site moves about and, as he or she begins to move out of the range of the cell site, the coverage becomes weaker. As the customer travels, the call is transferred ("handed-off') to the adjacent cell site, if that cell site is within range. 7. To establish the necessary distribution of cell sites and to help ensure that coverage is seamless and reliable, cell sites are strategically located throughout the licensed coverage area based upon, among other things, network efficiency, topography of the land and the location of other cell sites. 8. When a significant service deficiency exists, the ability for effective communication is diminished and service can seriously deteriorate in that region. Customers experience the inability to make calls, continue calls, and receive calls and may experience inaudible conversation ("muting"). 9. The location and height of the antennas are determined by some or all of the 2 following factors: i. ii. iii. iv. Terrain and land cover features in the region; Location of candidate properties; Location of existing cell sites in the network; and Use of sophisticated computer software programs, utilizing physical principals, which allow the radio frequency engineer to forecast the anticipated coverage at a given height and location. 10. The computer software programs utilize ground elevation data from maps published by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey. Ground cover is determined mostly by physical inspection and aerial photographs of the locality. 11. The coverage information described above is analyzed to determine the minimum height required for the cell site. 12. If the antennas are placed at an elevation which is lower than the minimum needed height, coverage is reduced and additional cell sites will be required to alleviate the service deficiency. NEED FOR THE SITE 13. There is a serious service deficiency in T-Mobile's wireless telephone coverage in the Town. A deficiency in coverage is evidenced by the inability to adequately transmit or receive calls, as detailed above. 14. The deficiency in coverage that exists in the Town prevents T-Mobile from providing uniform, reliable, wireless coverage to public and private users, including, but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance, and emergency response services. 15. The deficiency in wireless service within the Town is ongoing and pervasive. I base this conclusion on personal knowledge gained through my use of computer modeling, which RF engineers employ to identify deficiencies in wireless coverage. 16. Three (3) computer generated maps, showing the deficiency in wireless coverage that exists in the Town at three signal strength depictions, as required by the Town (-75 dBm, -85 dBm and -95 dBm), are attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A." 17. These deficiency or "gap" maps take into account the operation of the neighboring cell sites operated by T-Mobile. These maps demonstrate the area within which T- Mobile's existing service is not adequate. THE SITE IS IDEALLY LOCATED 18. My analysis confirms that the Site will provide reliable coverage for the area in the Town in which T-Mobile is experiencing a service deficiency. 19. Specifically, the primary objective for T-Mobile within the Cutchogue area is to supply both in-vehicle coverage along Main Road, as well as in-building coverage within the surrounding structures. 20. Three additional computer generated maps, demonstrating that most of the deficiency area is eliminated when the Site is "turned on", at three signal strength depictions, as required by the Town (-75 dBm, -85 dBm and -95 dBm), are attached hereto as EXHIBIT "B." 21. T-Mobile operates other wireless communications sites in the vicinity of the Town and surrounding area. The location of these existing cell sites dictate where new cell sites may be located when there is a need to remedy a deficiency in coverage. 22. The communications coverage deficiency exists in the Town despite the operation of T-Mobile's surrounding cell sites. Mobile telephone technology is designed to be used at a uniform "power output" such that a site can communicate with a mobile unit and a mobile unit has enough power to communicate with the base site. T-Mobile cannot simply "turn up" the power of the surrounding cell sites to provide coverage in the deficiency area. Increasing the power of the surrounding cell sites would create an unbalanced system where the site may be able to communicate with the mobile unit but the mobile unit does not have the power to communicate with any site. The mobile units use a battery and are limited in their power output so a mobile unit cannot "turn up" the power to maintain the balance. In addition, T-Mobile's licensed frequencies are, generally, "line of sight" and increasing the power would not overcome signal blockage due to obstacles, such as hills, valleys, existing buildings and trees. Finally, the FCC limits the power output of both the cell sites and the mobile telephones. Thus, limitations in technology, topography and FCC regulations result in a finite number of alternative cell sites that may be considered as possible candidates to remedy a deficiency in coverage. ALTERNATIVE SITES 23. As required by Town code, our office has also reviewed and evaluated several potential alternative sites surrounding the Site for the placement of the Communication Facility (the "Alternative Sites"). 24. I have analyzed these Alternative Sites in order to determine the feasibility of the same to remedy the service deficiency within the Cutchogue search area, that the proposed 4 Communication Facility is designed to address. ALTERNATIVE SITES EVALUATED 25. There is an existing pole on property owned by the Cutchogue Fire Department, located at 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue. Three computer generated maps depicting the expected wireless coverage for a T-Mobile communication facility at this location, at three signal strength depictions, as required by the Town (-75 dBm, -85 dBm and -95 dBm), are attached hereto as EXHIBIT "C." These maps also depict the location of the proposed Site and its expected propagation, and take into account the operation of the neighboring cell sites operated by T-Mobile. Based upon my analysis, I have determined that this pole is suitable for the installation of T-Mobile's communication facility. However, according to the affidavit of the Site Acquisition Specialist, the Cutehogue Fire Depa~hnent is not available for leasing. 26. There is an existing pole on a property owned by the New York Telephone Company (a/k/a Verizon), located at 31775 Main Road, Cutchogue. Three computer generated maps depicting the expected wireless coverage for a T-Mobile communication facility at this location, at three signal strength depictions, as required by the Town (-75 dBm, -85 dBm and -95 dBm), are attached hereto as EXHIBIT "D." These maps also depict the location of the proposed Site and its expected propagation, and take into account the operation of the neighboring cell sites operated by T-Mobile. Based upon my analysis, I have determined that this pole is suitable for the installation of T-Mobile's communication facility. However, according to the affidavit of the Site Acquisition Specialist, this pole contains two large existing dish antennas and is unavailable for leasing at this time. CONCLUSION 27. Based on the foregoing data, maps and analysis, it is my professional opinion that: (i) there exists a serious deficiency in T-Mobile's wireless communications coverage within the Cutchogue search area; (ii) the Alternative Sites, which are located within one-half mile of the Site, are also suitable to remedy T-Mobile's service deficiency within the Cutchogue search area but are unavailable for leasing; and (iii) thus this Site is the best suited, feasible, available location to provide seamless, ubiquitous, reliable coverage within the Cutchogue search area. 28~ Based on the foregoing, the Site should be favorably considered by the Planning Board and T-Mobile's requested Application should be granted. T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC By: /~ Name: M/h~lr~a ~Ni~to Title: Radio Frequency Engineer Sworn to before me this day of February, 2010 JENNIFER DONOHUE i~(e~ pul~l~ - State of New Yo~ NO. 0t C)O~ 11094 Qt~lfle~ in lu#0;k County _, 6 EXHIBIT "A" DEFICIENCY OR "GAP" MAPS OVERLAID ON EXISTING COVERAGE PROPAGATION MAPS · Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Coverage s Ln Map: Existing Coverage at -75 dBm Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08114/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Coverage Map: Existing Coverage at -85 dBm Site ID: L1.13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14109 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Proposed Site · Existing Sites Coverage Map: Existing Coverage at -95 dBm Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles EXHIBIT "B" THREE COMPUTER GENERATED MAPS DEMONSTRATING DEFICIENCY ELIMINATION ~ Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ Coverage Map: Existing and Proposed Coverage at -75 dBm Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08114/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles Proposed Site Existing Sites Coverage Map: Existing and Proposed Coverage at -85 dBm Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch -- 0.7 miles · Proposed Site · Existing Sites Coverage Map: Existing and Proposed Coverage at -95 dBm Site ID: L1-13-807C Site Name: Presbyterian Church 27245 Main Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 08/14/09 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles EXHIBIT "C" THREE COMPUTER GENERATED MAPS DEPICTING WIRELESS COVERAGE FOR A COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT THE CUTCHOUGE FIRE DEPARTMENT, 260 NEW SUFFOLK ROAD, CUTCHOUGE ® Verizon Pole Proposed Site · Existing Sites ~ -75dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage (-75 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location @ 85 ft Site Name: Cutchogue Fire Department 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 02/22/2010 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles .Mobile Cutchogue Fire Department Proposed Site Existing Sites -85 dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage (-85 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location @ 85 ft Site Name: Cutchogue Fire Department 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 02/22/2010 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles -Mobile Cutchogue Fire Department Proposed Site · Existing Sites -95 dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage (-95 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location @ 85 ft Site Name: Cutchogue Fire Department 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue NY, 11935 Prepared: 02/22/2010 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles EXHIBIT "D" THREE COMPUTER GENERATED MAPS DEPICTING WIRELESS COVERAGE FOR A COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT PROPERTY OWNED BY NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, 31775 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE Verizon Pole Proposed Site Existing Sites ~ -?$dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage (-75 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location @ 85 ft Site Name: Verizon Pole 31755 Main Road, Southold NY, 11935 Prepared: 02/22/2010 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles ~..Mobile.~, Verizon Pole Proposed Site · Existing Sites -85 dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage (-85 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location @ 85 ft Site Name: Verizon Pole 31755 Main Road, Southold NY, 11935 Prepared: 02/22/2010 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Mobile Verizon Pole Proposed Site · Existing Sites -95 dBm Coverage Map: Composite Coverage (-95 dBm) Site ID: Alternate Location @ 85 ft Site Name: Verizon Pole 31755 Main Road, Southold NY, 11935 Prepared: 02/22/2010 Map Scale: linch = 0.7 miles · Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 /THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUEJ 27245 MAIN RD., CUTCHOGUE, NY I I :Laurel WILLIAM ARCHI F. COLLIN~ AIA T E C T S, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE VOICE : 631-689-8450 8~TAUI(ET, NY 11733 FAX: PAUL LaPA£OTA DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 BLOCK' 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE; N 41' 00' ZONING: R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSI]~O LONGITUDE: W 72' 29' ' , NAD: 83 , AMSL: 20' NORTH 31" LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAWLAND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 400 SQ.FT.:E EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S18020 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINETS, (1) BA~q'ERY CABINET, (1) UMTS CABINET AND (1) PPC CABINET (8) ANDREW: TMBXX-6516-R2M PROPERS' CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: UTILI]¥ CONTACT: APPLICANT: TOM WICKHAM (631) 765-5454 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 (631) 548-7042 LIPA T-MOBiLE NORTHEAST LLC T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: 3500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, N.Y. 11739 PAUL LAPASOTA (631) 224-6651 MARIANA NEtTO (631) 224-6600 lO/15/08 TITLE SHEET VICINITY PLAN lO/15/o8 02/22/10 02/22/10 SITE pLAN 10/13/08 02/22/10 EQUIPMENT pLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATTERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS AND PLANTING DETAIL 10/13/08 NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONS lO/15/o8 MARIANA NEITO NORTH HOWARD LEGER ,LEGER http://www.wfeaia.com DA"~-, 10/13/08 DATE REV~ION 12/16/08 PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 11/19/09 ISSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW 12/30/09 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 10/15/08 02/22/10 02/22/10 02/22/10 01/06/10 iSSUED FOR FILING 02/12/10 FOR REVIEW 02/19//0 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/22/10 L~SU~L~ TO FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 11/10/08 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ])ATE ~88UE~) TO 11/03/09 FOR FILING 11/18/09 FOR REVIEW FOR FILING FOR REVIEW 12/16/b8 FOR FILING 04/29/0~ FOR FILING FOR REVIEW PLAN: · T-. ;Mobile- Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUT~HOGUE ,~_ ..... ~ ~-~22~AIN ROAD '" ~ ~, I, ,, I,t4 (~uT-cH~,'G[,J¢:, NY 11935 '~l- - / ~ L1-13-807-C -'T~LE SHEET 10/08/08 AS NOTED NM 10F4 DRAWING NO.: T-1 07-7199 ~ x x ~ 1-~ORY ~ .~ / ~.~. ~ -~ ~ JJ Qq/O6/JO ]SUED FOR REVIEW J5 32/22/10 ~SUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS /5 /%-- X / 2-~0~ RESIDENCE ~ ~-/ , . g j 04,29,a~ FORFILING 2 ~0~ RESIDENCE _> ............... OF CUTCBOGUE NY 11935 PLAN 10108/08 07 7199 NOTE: ~ D~G NO.: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURV~ PREPARED BY: BARRY, BONACCJ ~ AS NOTED AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURV~ORS, P~NNERS ,175A COMMERCE DR~VE HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 PHONE: (631) 455-1111 JOB NO. A070628 DATED AUGUST 50, 0 55' 7O' 140' CT INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A TAX MAP PREPARED BY COUN~ OF NM . VICINI PLAN su~o,~, R~L PROPER~ TAX SERVICE AGENCY, COU,~ CENTER, RJVERH~D, NY 1190,. SCALE: ~" 70' 0" DATED JUNE 5TH, 2007 NORTH ~ NO.= PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WOOD FENCE RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS MAY EXCEED FC( UMITS FOR UNCONTROIIF'O OR GENERAL POPULATION EXPOSURE IN PROXIMITY TO ANTENNA FACE. SEE NO. U-13807C REFER TO SITE SPECIFIC RF EMS SAFE'fY PLAN ON FILE WITH BUILDING MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK PROVIDE ONE SIGN ON THE DOORWAY TO THE STEEPLE LOCATED AT BALCONY LEVEL OF CHURCH EQUIPMENT ID SIGN T-MOBILE LIMITED ACCESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FAClLffY, WHICH PRODUCES RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION, IS PRESENT WITHIN STEEPLE RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION RANGE IS 190D-2000 MHz IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL T-MOBILE OPERATIONS CENTER AT 1-888-218-6664. 24. HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK T-MOBILE SITE ID ~ L1-13807C PROVIDE ONE SIGN ON THE DOORWAY TO THE $~'"PLE LOCATED AT BALCONY LEVEL OF CHURCH SIGNAGE REQUIREMENT NOTE; INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARRETT, BONACCI AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUOE NY 11788 PHONE: (651) 455-1111 JOB NO. A070628 DATED AUGUST 80, 2007 SITE PLAN ~ 1"=20'-0" % % % LEGEND CONCRETE CURB ~ CROP CURB · WALL ~ EDGE OF PAVEMENT o WIRE FENCE (~ STOCKADE FENCE [] PICKET FENCE [] CONCRETE ® TREE LINE '0' HEDGE ,c 55 oo / TREE 55.43 MONUMENT DRAINAGE INLE~ / STRUCTURE DRAINAGE INLET / STRUCTURE SIGN LIGHT POLE STRUCTURE - DRAINAGE ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT TOP / BO]q'OM OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION \ \ \ \ EXISTING X,x~PARKING LOT- SECTOfR 'D'I < i270' % % L~39.27, / iSECTOR 'D' 90' > FACILITY NOTES A) PROPOSED FEATURES LABELED AS SUCH; ALL ELSE EXISTING OR FUTURE BY OTHERS· B) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACiLiTY IS UNMANNED AND WILL BE VISITED APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO GENERATE ADDITIONAL NOISE, FUMES, V~BRATIONS, DUST, ODORS OR TRAFFIC. C) NO ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. D) NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE. F) THERE WiLL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL SIGNS, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE PROPOSED SITE, G) FIRE PROTECTION AND SECURITY PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORING OF THE SUB,JECT SITE. H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WiTH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE AND NFPA 70, FOR ELECTRICAL WORK AND GROUNDING. I) THE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA MOUNT STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE CONSIDERATION OF ICING, FURTHER, THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SNALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WiTH CHAPTER 16, CHAPTER 17, CHAPTER 18, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION .3108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. 0 10' 20' 40' 1 "=20' NORTH PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT AREA, SEE 1/SP-3 FOR MORE INFORMATION -- PROPOSED CABLE TRAY TO ROUTE ANTENNAS UP INTO EXISTING ATnC AND TO PROPOSED ANTENNAS EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING REMOVE AREAS OF EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE FOR ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED, REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING 51'EEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. SEE ELEVATIONS SP-4 & SP-5 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (TYp. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETAIL 2/SP-3. NOTE; ~ BARE ROOT PLANTS WILL NOT BE PERMFrED. ALL PLANTING TO BE PRUNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST ACCEPTED NURSERYMAN'S PRACTICE -- NEW 6' TALL (MINIMUM) AMERICAN ARBORVITAE B/ERGREEN TREES PLANTED @ 5'-0" O.C. TO BE PLUMB AS SHOWN ON 1/A-3. (GUARANTEE TREES FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR) -- 1/2"¢ RUBBER HOSE AND 12 GA. GALV. WIRE PROVIDE TURN BUCKLES (5) OR TWIST ADJUSTMENT. BARK CHIPS (V,I.F.) OR EQUIVALENT ;FILL WITH TOPSOrL MIXED WiTH 0/20/0 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF (5) POUNDS PER YARD. WATER THOROUGHLY AND FILL TO EXISTING EARTH LINE ON TREE TRUNK. (3) CEDAR STAKES DRIVEN AND DRAWN STRAIGHT. STAKES SET AT 120' INTERVALS AND EQUAL-DISTANT FROM TREE ~ SUBSOIL TYP PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 1"=1'-0" WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA AR C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE ,!t~TAU[~, I'X"Y 1'17.~ VOIC~ : (x:~t4iFS4:~ FA: http://www.wfcaia.com C01~LTANT:, AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS ISSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS I~U~,L) TO DATE ~ TO 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FILING FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING FOR REVrEW FOR FILING FOR FILING FOR REVIEW AREA OF WORK-- · t...Mobile. Northeast LLC 5500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUT HOGUE _ .-T.~7~qlvlAFI 1~3AD F,] ~=]]]', ~:~,CUTCHO~UE NY 11935 ~','~ ~h - ,, ,LI-~-~7-C , SITE PLAN 10/08/08 AS NOTED DI~WN ~: CT NM SP-2 07-7199 ~ ~% ANTENNA ~ ~ l~ ~% ~ (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO / ~ ~(L~ ~ ~ ~ / PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ~. SEE D~NL -MFG: ANDR~ - DECIBEL -PART NO.: TMBXX-6516-R2M ~ ~ % ~ / REMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA SYSTEM -- EXISTING WOOD PICK~ FENCE MECHANICAL INFO -WEIGHT: 54.6 LBS. I -MAX. WIND AR~: 2.9 SQ.~. ~ . ~ ~;~%~% -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED & [ C B ] T ~ C ~ & % m -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 SCREEN PROPOSED "~ER / DlSCONNE~ a ~~2, ~ 11 ~'~ , ; % VOZ~ ~.~ ~, VERIZON ~SECTOR ~1~ ~ ~ ~ -]. ~ t t ~: / / w w w . w f ¢ I J I . PROPOSED ... ~ EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ~ ~- m a , ) PROPOSED ~~ %~ C~ '~0% ~0' ~ k%~% / ,_ i u ON PROPO (,) ..o o ANTENNA DETAILS PROPOSED SCALE: 1 "= 1 '-0" ~T~ PROPOSED EQUIPME~ MOUN~D I BY CARRIER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR, ~O. DA~ ~ON 4'-~ 1/2" 4 12/16/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS , 9 11/19/09 iSSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW PROPOSED ~ ~0 12/30/09 BSUED FOR REVIEW 11 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW (2) P.OPOSED ~oo~ ~.~ *TOP PROPOSED / % %~/~ Ak /~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ OV0~/~0 ~SSU,D ~O~ CONCR~E P~ ~ ~ ~ 1302/12//0 ISSUED FOR REVIEW PROPOSED ~ SUPPO~ PO~ WI~ PROPOSED / ~~'~ ~ ~ " ~ . ~ 14 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW HORIZONT[ ~C[ TO ~Ul~[ S~DIN~ ~T[S ~ ~ ~ ~ IB ~21~I~ ISSUED FOR BLI~ PER TOWN [XJSTI~ TREE TO REEAI~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 10113108FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FOR FILING EQUIPMENT PLAN ~ '') m 11'1~'~8FOR RLIN~ ,, N O RTH ~ ~ I ,~/,~/o~ FO~ ~VEW SCALE: 1 6 0 ~ 12/16/08 FO~ FILING , ~ I ~4/29/0~FO~ FILING PLAN * BAKERY PLINTH ~o/~/o~ ~o~ ~vi~w NORTHSTAR NSB170~ BAKERY SPECIFICATION MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS ELECTRICAL ALL NORTHSTAR CHARACTERISTICS~~~ DRY CELL HiGH PURI~ L~B 99.99%S~ U<S ~"~US, U,~TS ~ 'OD, CA,*a~ TO ~.~ V~C 1~.~ A"~-,OU,S ~0., PLAN ~ EQUIPMENT CAB. SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR MISSION-CRITICAL REFER TO THE NSB D~AILEB AMP-HOURS (2) EQUIPMENT CABIN.S TO BE NORTEL S18020 SUPPLIED BY APPUCATIONS. EXCELS AT HiGH-RATE PERFORMANCE TABLES FOR 10 HOUR CAPACI~ TO 1.80 VPC 170 AMP-HOURS 172.4 NOTE: T-MOBILE, AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ DISCHARGE AND RECHARGE, EXTREME TEMPERATURE ADDITIONAL CURRENT, CAPACI~ AMP-HOURS (2) BAKERY PLINTHS TO BE NORTEL S18000BP MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION, RANGE, DEEP OR SHALLOW AND POWER INFORMATION. FLOAT VOLTAGE 2.29 +/- .02 VOLTS PER CELL 2.27 +/- SUPPLIED BY T-MOBiLE AND INSTALLED BY CYCLIC APPLICATIONS. HEIGHT 520.0 MM 12.60 INCHES .02 VOLTS PER CELL CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S18020: HIGH CYCLIC LIFE CAPABILI~ +500 C/3 ~ 80% DOB. WIDTH 125.0 MM 4.92 INCHES CYCLIC RECHARGE 2.45 VPC -- NO CURRENT LIMIT SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE 59-3/64" TALL x 53-1/64" WIDE x 28-15/16" DEEP 10 Y~R FLOAT LIFE AT 25"C (77"F) -- 15 Y~R LENGTH 560.0 MM 22.05 INCHES SHELF LIFE 2 Y~RS INFORMATION. CELL CAPACI~: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT FLOAT LIFE AT 20"0 (68'F). WEIGHT 59,1 KILOGRAMS 131.2 SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT 5,000 AMPS WEIGHT: 1114.28 LBS POUNDS VOLTAGE 12 VOLTS SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S18000BP: ELECTRIC REQUIRED: 208-240 VAC ~10%, FREQUENCY 45-65 Hz F~ME R~ARDANT (UL g4 VO) PC-ADS P~STIC CASE 19" HIGH x WlDE x DEEP ~0~~ ~ ~ AND COVER. TERMINAL TORQUE 8.0 IMPEDANCE (1KHZ) 1.5 MW 55" 44" NE~ON-M~ERS 71 NORTHSTAR BAKERY BAKERY CAPACI~: 170 Ah TO ~40 Ah OPERATION, FEMALE M8 BRASS INCH-POUNDS COMPANY IS PROUD HVAC CAPACI~: 190 WA~S-COOLING · 250 W ~¢ TERMINALS PROVIDE MAXIMUM HIGH ~TE PERFORMANCE TO BE REGISTERED TO H~TING ~ NEW GPS UNIT BY NAIS AND NO ANNUAL R~IGHTENING. IS0-900~:2000 AND WEIGHT: 1522 LBS (273 LBS WITHOUT BAKERIES}~ MODEL VIC-lO0 INTEG~L HANDLES ENSURE ~SE OF HANDLING. IS0-14001 STANDARDS, A~ACHED TO ETS APPROVED AS NON-HAZARDOUS CARGO FOR GROUND, FORM: SES-542-06 ISSUED: 05/05/04 EGO: 545-S04 . _ ,. ~ CABIN~, COORDINATE NO~ i , . · % EXACT LOCATION WITH ~ ', ~ OF WO~~ S~ AND AIR TRANSPORTATION. / % % ~T-MOBILE RF ENGINEER I / ~ %'. GPS L ADAPTER 1' + .r ,- + ,, ] · -Mobile ~ ~ -. ANTENNA CABLE Northeast EEC ~ k / INSTALLER INTO (4) I GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 , ~ ~ ~/~ DRILLED, USING BASE ~ ' ~ =='~ ..... AS A TEMP~TE ~ ~ ,,-5 E~ [ ~ ~ ~ ]~RESB~m~ CHURCH ( ) ~ ~~ CABLE COVER == ' ...... ~ ~ "~ "~' oF gUTCHOGUE ',l / ~,," '. " ' -- - , ' ' MAH~AD r' ,, I -- ., [. - ....... CUTCHOG ~E, ~ 11935 ,, / k H , I II ~ _ I II I ' '-~ I~J7807-C ~ ~ ,, EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, ~ ~ ~ ' TYPICAL BATTERY, EQUIPMENT PLAN · EQUIPMENT CAB. : , '~- ;%. - , . :. . - 'I., - ~ ~ EQUIPMENT PAD D~AIL.~ ~/ EQUIPMEN~ PAD D~AJL. ~: AS NOTED D~O -- SECURE NEW T-MOBILE BAKERY CABJN~ TO / ~SECURE NEW T MOBILE SlDOOOBP BA~ERY PLINTH TO / D~ ~ S~ IN HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS. / (~P') S ~ 3 PICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS - SCALE: 5/4"= ~ '-0" ~ ~o., SCALE: 5/4"=1 '-0" 4 OF 6 T LOCATION WITH ' )BILE RF ENGINEER L ADAPTER ~'KET AND GASKET, (IAL GPS iNNA CABLE kLL MOUNTING tOPS PROVIDED BY kLLER INTO (4) qTlNG HOLES _ED, USING BASE ~ TEMPLATE E COVER ~ (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN W EXI~ING CHURCH ~EEPLE. (~P. 2 PER SE~OR) SEE HATCHED ~ INOICA~S PO~ON OF ~-I ~O~Y ~EEP~ TO BE MODIFIED TO / VOI~ T.O. OF EXJSTING~65'-OSTEEPLEAGL ~ ACCOMODATE PROPOSED ~EN~ / INACTION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL ~ / ~65'-0 AGL ~ MA~R~ TO BE REP~CED WITH I / %0. OF EXISTING STEEPLE ~ PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE ~ / EX,STING CHURCH ~EEPLE ~~ CONC~E~ TO MATCH ~I~NG ,~ ~ (a) wo. ~I~NG CHURCH mEPLE. (~. 2 PER SE~OR) SEE D~NL 2/$P-3. ~ ~// ~ REQUIRED. REMOV~ MA~RR~ TO BE REP~CEO WITH q l II ~54'-4" AGL~ ~54'-4' AGL ~ PROPOSED RF COMPA~B~ CONC~E~ TO ~TCH EXI~ING ~ ~ II II ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ANTENN~ b~LE IN A~ R~PE~. ~ PROPOSED ~ OF WORK ~ OF PROPOSED T-~OBI~ ~ENN~ ~ PROPOSED ~NNA ~BLES ROUND UP ~ROUGH .... ~I~NG CHURCH BUILDING A~IC I~0 ~EP~ I ~ 4 12/16/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION I I ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE A~EN~ ~~~'/[~ i ~ ~45'-~" AGL ~ 10 12/30/0~ SSUED FOR ~EVIEW [ EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE 13 02/12/I0 SSUED FO~ REVIEW 1~ 02/19/10 SSUED FOR REVIEW PROPOSED T-MOBILE ~ T~Y MOUSED TO -- : ~-- ~ ~ SIDE OF CHURCH BUI~ING. PROPOSEO . ~ C~ T~Y TO 8E PN~ED TO ~TCH ~ ~ ~3~'-%" ASL ~ t[~ ~ ~3~'-4" AOL ~~V~O/O~ FO~ R~V~E~~/~8/0~ FOR REWE~ ~P~CE OF ~I~N8 ~EIOE 8UI~IN8 ~ ~ ~ ~ OF FUTURE CARRER ANTENNAS . W~~-~ ~ ~U~UR[ CA~R~[R A~T[~A / ~ ~ I ~ ', ~ ;4~ ~ ~2 ~ ~ ~2/16/0~ FOR REWEW I ~XrST~N0 TREES TO REMAJJN , ~.-- ~ ~ f . ~ f~ ~ 12/lb/0 FOE FILING Northeast LLC ............. THE PRES YIEBAN CHURCH ~ PROPOSED T MOBILE CAB~ TroY MOUN~D TO ~ SIDE OF CHURCH '~.--' ' .. .......... "NORTHWEST& ~ BUILDING. PROPOSED ~B~ ~Y TO BE PNN~D TO ~TCH APP~NCE , .,.,,,,.' ............ ~THEAST E~VATIONS oF EXI~ING ~ERIOR BUI~ING WA~ EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETNL 2/SP-2 PROPOSED DARK SKY COMPLIANT UGHT-- // PROPOSED VERIZON / TRANSECTOR BOX / / MOUNTED TO / / PROPOSED UNISTRUT / / ! \ · 6'-10# AGL T.O, PROPOSED ~ T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT GRADE I~ PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE TO SCREEN PROPOSED METER / DISCONNECT & VERIZON TRANSECTOR CABINET. (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED CONCRLIL PAD. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-3 PROPOSED ELECTRIC M~ER / DISCONNECT SWITCH PANEL MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTEUT RACK (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE PPC CABINET MOUNTED ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE UMTS CABINET MOUNTED ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE WITH (2) 21'-6' SLIDING GATES IN FRONT OF PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. DATE~ ]PI~OJECT NO.: 10/08/08 07-7199 PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUBH EXISTING ~ DR.~.~4O NO.: CHURCH BUILDING ATTIC INTO STEEPLE AS NOTED CE NORTHWEST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION RM . -- · SCALE: 5/16"=1'-0" SCALE: 5/16":1'-0" s~-~,.'No.: 5OF6 EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD I~ J:65'-0 AGL (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET ATOP %o. OF EXISTING STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE, (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE \ PROPOSED AREAS OF WORK- PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD -- ~ HATCHED AREA INDICATES PoI~rlON OF STEEPLE TO BE / MODIFIED TO ACCOMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION '1' PROPOSED GPS UNT MOU [ AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH ( ) NTED TO ~ .~k.~.54''-4'" AGL ]I ~ PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET, ~ ~ WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ~' ~. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS i A R C H I T E C T S, L L P PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS \ ~ ~ EXISTINC CHURCH BUILDING ATnC INTO STEEPLE ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD -- ~ 12-I TECHNOLOGY DRIV~ S~TAU~iT, NY ~ (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT ~.**'-.- AGL II PROPOSEO T-MOBILE C~LE TBAY MOUHTED TO ~ C'~N~ ATOP PROPOSEO CONCRETE PAD \ \ \ \ '~' OP PROPOSEO T-MOB,LE A"~.~ ' ..CE OF CH URO. BU,LO,.G.P.OPOSEO CASLE TBAY SEE DETA.L */SP-. ........... · ' -- ' -- ~'''" ~''""'"~--~ TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTIN,G \ \ ~ [ EX,STING TREES TO REMAIN -- ~ ~ :,¢% FUTURE CARRIER ANTEN LOCATION COI~ULTANT: , / PANEL .OUNTED TO P.OPOSED U.,STR* HACK NO. DATE REVISION L_ 4 12/16/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS ' ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ A A A __ 4-6'-10' AGL 11 01/86/10 SSUED FOR REVIEW ............................... ~- ~ % ~ (20) PROPOSED ARBORV~AE ~JACENT TO 10/13/08FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 :OR FILING ~ ~ PROPOSED EQUIPME~ ~. SEE D~NL 11/10/08FOR ~EVIEW 11/18/09 ~FO~ REVIEW ~ X 2/SP-2 PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHI~ VI~ ~NCE / X 11/10/08FOR FILING MOUSED ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPME~ PAD / ~ ~1~ PROPOSmn ~_~*nm~r ~ ~*~,~ 12/16/~5FO~ REVIEW NORTHEAST ELEVATION ~.oNT o~ .~o.o~ ~ou...~.~ .~. ~ 04/29/09 ~0~ FILING EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE ~65'-0 AGL~ T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE~ (8) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ AN~N~ MOUN~D WI~IN EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS ~~ PROPOSED AR* OF WORK EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE AN~N~ ~orthe~st (1) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~E~ ~IN~ ATOP PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f~~ X CONOR~ P~ (B~OND). SEE D~NL 5/SP-, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA~ ~ ~ * OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS* GREATSUITERIVER.D-20'NY PROPOsEDPROPOSED CONCR~ED~K S~ p~COMPU~ ............... UG~ ATOP ~ ~/ ~t~ ~ . ~ ~_~ ~ ~e~ ~ '~ '~,, ¢ ¢ ~ ~~ ~ LOCATION , ~-~ . % HATCHED ~B INDI~TB PO~ON OF STEEP~ TO CONCR~ P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ %~~%~ff ~ ~ ~ ~ % r TO BE REP~CED WffH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE PROPOSED SEDI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - I CONC~E~ TO MATCH EXI~NG ~EEP~ IN PROPOSED E~IC M~ER / DISCONNE~ SWITCH % % % % ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~:%¢,~/~ ,~- ~ I ~ PROPOSED ANTENNA ~LES ROUTED UP ~ROUGH .......... QF'"CUTCHOGUE PROPOSED VERIZ I -- ~X~ ~ --- CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 PROPOSED EQUI I ,_~ j T.O. PROPOSED ¢ , , ,;,~ c ~UT~ESTr E~VATIONS I ~ E T-MOBI~ EQUIPMENT ~ I 10/08/08 B7-7199 ~ I .... 0'-0" ~ SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 5500 SUNRSE COMMUNICATIONS INC. H GHWAY, SUTE D-205 GREAT R VER, NY 117,39 /THE P£ESB EPIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE] 27245 MAIN RD.. CUTCHOGUE. NY I 1935 WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T 8, LLP L~-I TECHNOLOGy DRIVE 8ETAUKET, ~ IlTA~ VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX : 63t~o8~-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com HuE4~a NORTH NORTH PAUL LaPASOTA MAZEN ALADWAN HO~'ARD LEGER HOWARD LEGER DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 BLOCK: 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE: N 41" 00' 31" ZONING: R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSI~f) LONGITUDE: W 72' 29' 13" NAD: 83 AMSL: 20' LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: PROPERq~( CONTACT: BUILDIND OWNER: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS INC., PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: TITLE SHEET RAWLAND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 40O SQ.FT.± (2) S12000 C4BINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINETS, (1) BATTERY CABINET, (1) UMTS OABBET AND (1) PPC CABINET (8) ANDREW: l$~BXX-6516-R2M 04/29/09 04/29/09 04/29/09 04/29/09 TOM WICKHAM (631) 765-5454 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROkD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 (631) 548-7042 LIPA OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3500 SUNRISE H~:N, SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, N.Y. 11739 PAUL LAPASOTA (631) 224-6651 MAZEN ALADWAN (651) 224-6625 1 o/13/08 SITE PLAN 10/13/08 04/29/09 DA'TB 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING FOR FILING EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATFERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS AND PLANTING DETAIL 10/13/08 AREA OF WORK- REVISION PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS DRAWN BY: CT NO.: 1OF5 ~ NO, LJ DRAWING NO.: T-1 lO/13/o8 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS lO/13/o8 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS AS NOTED 10/08/08 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, NY 117,39 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD AUG 21 2009 TITLE SHEET 07 7199 THE ~Omnipoint COMMUNICATIONS INC. . PROPERTY LINE WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA AR C H I T E C T S, LLP EXISTING WOOD FENCE 12-1 TECHNOLOOY DRIVE ~A~T, VOI~ : ~&~ F~: fl-~) http://www.wfeaia.eom ) SEE 1/SP-2 FOR MORE INFORMATION NO. ~ ~ON _ ~.I.~TJN WqO/08 ~S P~ ATTO~N~Y COMMENTS . o .o ~o~O~ RF COMPATIB~ CONC~ME~ ~TERIAL 11/~0/08 FOE FILING ~SEMBLY TO MATCH ~I~ING CHURCH 12/1~/08 FO~ ~EVIEW SECTOR 'B'~ ~S~CTO~ '9' ~' (8) PROPOSED OMNIPOI~ ~TENN~ MOUNTED WEHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIB~ CONC~ENT MATER~ GENE~LY ~TCH ~I~ING ~EEPLE (~P. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE D~AIL 2/SP-2 ~ OF Omnipoint ~ 5500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE R 25 oo' D-205, GREAT RIVER, NY L~39.27, 11739 ~ THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 272C~ MAINe, mAD FACILI~NOTES< LEGEND ' - , -- ~ DROP CURB , DRAINAGE INLET /STRUCTURE ADDITIONALAPPROXIMATELYNoIsE.ONCE A MONTHFuMES. VIBRATIONs.FOR MAI NTENANCEDusT. ODoRsPURPOSES;oR TRAFFIc.THEREFORE IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO GENERATE ' ,,,,,~ WALL q' SIGNI C) NO ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. LIGHT ~ D) NO SOL~D OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. ~ ~ ~NO.: ..,.,,~ ~ TREE LINE ~ FIRE HYDRANT H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILI~ SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BU'LDING CODE A SURV~ PREPARED By: BARRY, BONACCI 0 10' 20' 40' SITE PLAN $ DATED August 50. 2007 SCALE: 1 "=20'-0" ~ MONUMENT 18, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION 3108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE.NORTH ~ ~o., , (14) PROPOSED ARBORVmTAE SURROUNDING I/r/ ~.~ ~ PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUN~GE. SEE , l/ / / ~ ~ ~- EXISTING WOOD ~ 8" ~ I~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~X~STm~ ~RV WeLL X.T[..A ~ ~~ U[CHA~mCAL (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ~ERY I ~ ~ ] ~ ~ / m TO REMAIN (BELOW) -MFG: ANDREW - DECIBEL i -WEIGHT: 34.6 LBS. ~BIN~ ATOP PROPOSED. EQUIPME~ m/~ ~ / ~ / J -PART NO.: TMBXX-6516-R2M DUN~OE. SEE D~AIL 5/SP-2 m -~45" DUAL BAND QUAD ANTENNA · FULLY COMPATIBLE WiTH ANDREW TEL~ILTG -MAX. WIND LOAD (GIOOMPH): 164 LBF ~EMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA SYSTEM -- -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED QALVANIZED EXISTING HANDI WITH -CONNECTOR ~PE: 7-16 DiN, FEMALE -STANDARD MOUNTINQ HARDWARe: TM600999A-2 (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT PPC ~IN~ [ ~ / ~ /" ,,"~ ~ ~. ~ / m MOU~D ON P ~ m ~ I DUN~GE (1) PROPOSED UM~ ~ C~mN~ ATOP ~ PROPOSED CHN PROPOSED EQUIPUENT PRIVACY S~ DUN~GE MOU~D TO P EQUIPMENT DUN DUN~GE ATOP ATOP PROPOSE~ I EQUIPME~ DUNNAGE -~ (~. FOR (4))~ ~I~ ~ ~ * (2) PROPOSED ~ I ~ e O~NIPOINT EQUIPMENT C~IN~ ATOP PROPOSED EQUlP~E~ , PROPOSED . SIDE VIEW R~R VIEW FRONT ViEW ~NDING ROPOSED OMNIPOI~ ~ ~ ~ · DISCONNE~ ~I~ING CHURC PROPOSED ~LC ~/ ~ T~Y MOUSED (2) CABIN.S TO BE NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT 0 ~ WALL OF NORTEL ~2000 EQUIPMENT CABIN.S SUPPLIED BY OMN[POINT, AND INSTALLED BY XI~ING CHURCH CABIN~ SUPPLIED BY CARRIER, CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ MANUFACTURER UI~ING AND TO BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. I~ED TO ~TCH ~ 4'-5" SPECIFICATIONS: 53" I~ING E~ERIOR ¢ WIDE x '~. im UILDING WALL 1/~%~ , /[m ELECTRIcWEIGHT:CELL CAPACI~: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT1212REQUiRED:LBS 230V TO 240V EQUIPMENT PLAN ' I NORTH ~ ~ ~ / ~ / ~ ~ PLAN · EQUIPMENT CAB. ~ ~- % / ~ , p~omos~ ~ps UNIT ~Y / % NAIS MODEL VIC-lO0 / ~~ ~' /A~ACHED TO ETS / ~ / % ~ 4'-5" .' / CABIN~. COORDINATE ' / m m m mEXACT LOCATION WITH / ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ k OMNIPOINT RF ENGINEER. ~ ~ ~ % GPS L ADAPTER BRACK~ m EOUIPMENT CAB / PLAN ·_._. STEEL GRATING ATOP P // %% ~PROPQSED STEEL DUNNAGE MOUNT ~ ~P. BAKERY CABINET DETAILS su~-,AS~ SHALL BE MOUNTED TO STEEL GRATING WITH / '% SCALE:~/~ ,~/~":~ '-0" 1/2"¢ H.S. BOLTS AND SADDLE CLIP FASTENERS. J // %~ NEW 6' TALL (MINIMUM) AMERICAN ~/2"~ RUBBER HOSE AND 12 GA. GALV. WIRE k ~ ARBORVITAE ~ERGREEN TREES P~NTED ~ PROVIDE TURN BUCKLES (3) OR TWIST ADJUSTMENT. X ~ 5-0 O.C. TO BE PLUMB AS SHOWN t~ / o~ ~/A-5. CUA~A~T~E mEES ~OR A /~ / ~ INSTALL STAINLESS STEEL / SEPARATION SHE~ B~WEEN PERIOD OF ONE YEAR)~ % ~ / ~/ EQUIPMENT CABIN~ AND ~ ¢~ ~ CEDAR BARK CHIPS (V.I.F.) OR EQUIVALENT ~%/// STEEL GRATING. (5) CEDAR STAKES DRIVEN AND ~ //~ / kk / DRAWN STRAIGHT. STAKES S~ AT ED I wm FROM TREE~ % 7/ ~ / / 0/20/0 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF ~ ~ ~1 ~ / / (5) POUNDS PER YARD. WATER ~ //~ ' ~ / / THOROUGHLY AND FILL TO EXISTING ', I ................... ~, , ~ ............ 4 I ........ $ .............. [~ ~ /5 I ~W EARTH LINE ON TREE T. UNK. ~ ~~ ~ I / ': / ~ ROOT P~NTS WILL NOT BE X / ~~ Z ~ . ~ 5 5 DUNNAGE / PERMI~ED. ALL P~NTING TO BE ~~l~~~ ~ ~P. PL~ ~;~su~so,L ~ ~PIOAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS SCALE: 1 "= 1 '-0" SCALE: 3/4"= 1 '-0" WILLIAM E COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP I I 12-1 TECI~OLOOY DRIVE 8ETALTKET, ]qV 11733 VOICE : 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-68~-84~ ht tp://www.wfcaia.cem 12/16/08 FOR FILING 04/29/09 FOR FILING ~ PLAN: Omnipoint. COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE CHURCH CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD , NY 11935 U-13-807-C DETAILS, -\-' , EQUIPMENT DETAL SP 2 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE ';- J:65'-0 AGL ~ T.O. OF EX'STING STEEPLE ~ (8) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS MOUNTED WiTHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE ~ CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH 5q'EEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETNL 2/SP-2 ~ ~ FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL TO MATCH EXISTING W [ L I', ! A M F. C 0 , , o ~J ~. OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS '~ PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH ~ ~ ~: ~- - (1) PROPOSED GPS UNiT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED .... ~,~ EAsTPROPOSEDsIDE oFOMNIPOINTcHuRcHCABLEBuILDING.TRAYPRoPOSEDMOUNTED TOcABLE OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETAIL 5/SP-2 .~2}'~TT TRAY TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF , ,, · ,~' ~--- ,~ EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL (2) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP l, · .,l PROPOSEDMouNTED ToCHAINpRoPOsEDUNK FENCEoMNiPOiNTWITH PRIVACY SLATS AND 4'-0" GATE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL 5/SP-2 : , . ';' ,~, EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT PPC CABINET ~/¢:~//~' /f' ~-~/ (14-) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. MOUNTED ON PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE , I H /-', SEE DETNL '/SP-2 ,,,,, , .... (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS ATOP ' ' (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT BATrERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (BEYOND) CON~TA~. DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL 5/SP-2 ~~~ ~~ PROPOSED GALV. STEEL EQUIPMENT DUNNAG///~ ACCESS STNR WITH 3'-0" LANDING EXISTING WOOD RAMP WiTH HANDRAILS T.O. PROPOSED FENCE & PROPOSED SHRUBS ~0. DATE t~ 2 11/10/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS PROPOSED 0'-0" GRADE ~ DATE ISSUIBD TOD&TE ISS~ TO NORTHWEST ELEVATION 1,,1o,o~ EoN FOR FILING SCALE: 1/8"= 1 '-0" 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING 04/27/0~ FOR FILING ~ PLAN= EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE ,. ~ ~- ±65'-0 AGL ~ (8) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE ~ T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE N~ CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS ('rfP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETAIL 2/SP-2 AN..EPLACE. w. PROPOSE° .F CO.PAT." CO.C~ENT SCREEN.G ~ ~ ----~,, ~ ~ FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL TO MATCH EX STING -- -- ~ k, ~ I .I II ~ ~: 4-54'-4`" AGL ~ ,~ . ~< ~ ( OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS '~ PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH ~ 1 ~ L z ~_ ::1:4T-4" AGL ~ ~ OF WORK EX,...G CHU.CN SU,'D,NG ^~.C ,NTO STEEP'' ~ ~ ,~~ ~OF PROPOSED OMN,PO,NT,~EN~ ~Omnipoint. ~ c, MOUNTED TO PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE ,r~'~- (14`) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ~ CO]~[]~/~UNIC~]ON~ l'~C. PROPOSED OMNIPOINT CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH 4/SP-2 BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE ~RAY TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE ~ ~ OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-2 i~--913X, (% ~.~..~' ' ~ ~ ~ -= ~ '~¢ ~¢5 ~) PROPOSED OM.,PO,NT EOU,PMENT CAD,.~ ATOP ~_..~:~¢ ~ ~ PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL '/SP-211739 ~ ' THE PRE TERIAN CHURCH - ~~~__~i.~'~ ~ ~ ~ '; ,, ~,'~,~' (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE /t? /""/" '~'~I F · PROPOSED SHRUBS .,':~ x~RTH/AfiD~LEVATiONS .... OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT ~. ~/"~ GRADE ~ ~ D~G NO.: AS NOTED C~ SOUTHEAST ELEVATION~' S?-3 EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETAIL 2/BP-2 HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION Of EXISTING STEEPLE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WiTH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT SCREENING FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING AWIC INTO STEEPLE PROPOSED OMNIPOINT CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE ~Y TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL NORTHEAST ELEVATION _-%%--o,; PROPOSED CHNN UNK FENCE WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND 4-'-0" GATE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (14-) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL 4-/SP-2 (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT BATrERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (BEYOND). SEE DETAIL 3/BP-2 (1) PROPOSED PPC CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS SOUTHWEST ELEVATION T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE :E54'-4-" AGL ~. OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS :b47'-4" AGL ~. OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS (1) PROPOSED OPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETAIL 5/SP-2 (2) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL 5/SP-2 (14) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETNL 4/SP-2 (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT UMTS CABINET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE WiTH PRIVACY SLATS AND 4'-0' GATE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (1) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT BATfERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETNL 3/SP-2 EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS T.O. PROPOSED FENCE~F PROPOSED SHRUBS ±8'-11' T.O, PROPOSED~ OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE GRADE ~m m65'-0 AGL T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS MOUNTED WiTHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETAIL 2/SP-2 :b54-'-4" AOL ~ OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS :E47'-4" AOL ~ OF PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION Of EXISTING STEEPLE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT SCREENING FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH INTO STEEPLE EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATnc +9'-9" T.O. PROPOSED FENCE PROPOSED SHRUBS +8'- 11 ' T.O. PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT GRADE WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY B733 VOICE, : 6.~-689'-8450 FAX: 63/'-6~-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com ~ON AS FEE ATTORNEY COMMENTS DA"I'~ ~ TO FOR REVIEW FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING FOR REVIEW FOR FILING FOR FILING Omnipoint[ COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 :SBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD NY 11935 U-13-807-C AND WEST ELEVATIONS DA.T~; ~ NO.: 10/08/08 07-7199 DRAWING NO.: SP-4 5 OF 5 AS NOTED Northeast LC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-i TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com ,I CELLULAR COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT SITE NO. LI-13-$$3-A [OI?IENT FII?E DEPARTMENT] 23300 MAIN I?OAD. ORIENT. NY I 1957 PAUL b~PASOTA RHOAN GORDON NORTH JOHN MCAULIFFE STEPHEN LUISE JR. SITE NORTH SECTION: 0lB BLOCK: 5 LOT: 13.8 ZONING: RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY ZONING DISTRICT: R-BO LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: NAD 83 41' 8' 31.4556" 72' 18' 1,2960" LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAWLAND 430 SQ,FT.± EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S12000 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINETS, (1) BAI~'ERY CABINET & (1) PPC (3) APX 16DWV- 16BWVS-C (1) UMTS CABINET, PROPERTY CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: (631) 728-2086 VINCE CANNUSCIO UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: (631) 545-2242 LIPA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: 3500 SUNRISE HWY., SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 PAUL LAPASOTA (631) 224-6651 RHOAN GORBON (631) 224-6635 TITLE SHEET 05/20/0B SITE pLAN 05/20/09 VICINITY PLAN 05/20/09 EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATTERY AND EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS 05/20/09 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS 05/20/09 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS KEY PLAN: At~A · T...Mobile-I Northeast LLC 5500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY SUITE D-205, GREAT RIVER, NY 1175g ORIENT FIRE DEPARTMENT 09/18/09 TITLE: 09/18/09 09/18/09 09/18/09 09/18/09 DATE: ~L%- 05/01/09 SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NO.: SHEET NO.: SHEET 07-7315 DRAWING NO.: 1 OF MA~N ROAD (S.R. 25) (,KINGS HIGHWAY) EXISTING MASONR BUILDING (66' WiDE .o.W.) t EXISTING --, I, PARKING N 87'4.7'50" E 224-.52' 142' @" "0~ ROAD 5 XISTING 21 (1) STORY BUILDING PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT AREA, SEE 1/SP-3 FOR MORE INFORMATION LEGEND CONCRETE CURB DROP CURB WALL EDGE OF PAVEMENT WIRE FENCE STOCKADE FENCE PICKET FENCE CONCRETE TREE LINE DRAINAGE INLET / STRUCTURE DRAINAGE INLET / STRUCTURE SIGN LIGHT POLE STRUCTURE - DRAINAGE ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT TOP / BO%FOM OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION FACILITY NOTES A) PROPOSED FEATURES LABELED AS SUCH; ALL ELSE EXISTING OR FUTURE BY OTHERS. B) TBE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILil~ WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY iS UNMANNED AND WILL BE VISITED APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO GENERATE ADDITIONAL NOISE, FUMES, VIBRATIONS, DUST, ODORS OR TRAFFIC, C) NO ABIBITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. D) NO SOILID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE, E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE. F) THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL SIGNS FOR THE PROPOSED SITE. G) FIRE PROTECTION AND SECURITY PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORING OF THE SUBJECT SITE. H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE AND NFPA 70, FOR ELECTRICAL WORK AND GROUNDING. I) ANTENNAS WILL BE PAINTED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING BUILDING. J) THE A~TENNA AND ANTENNA MOUNT STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE CONSIDERATION OF ICING. FURTHER, THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18, CHAPTER 17, CHAPTER 18, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION 5108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE, SECTOR 'C', J // // i ~) % % o~ ~x..zo~ ~ / ~ WITH RADIUS OF 110'-0" ', , © © P.) PROPERTY LINE SITE PLAN ~ 1 "=55'-0" On" n" W INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON THE 1 LATEST TOWN APPROVED SITE PLANS PREPARED BY: I MICHAEL WALKER DESIGN/BUILDER LLC, 500 HORSENECK 1 ROAD, DARTMOUTH, MA 02748 PHONE: (508) 287-4515 1 PROJECT NO. MWDB.ORIENT, DATED JUNE 1, 2005 NOTE: PJM LAND SURVEYING. PLLQ 97 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST SAYVILLE, NY 11796 TEL: 6,31-565-3280 FAX:651-5,36-0400 PJMSURVEYING@AOL.COM LATITUDE: N 41'08',31.4556" LONGITUDE: W 72'18'1.2960" 0 8,75' 17.5' 35 i~-----~ 1 "=55' NORTH WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-i TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com KEY PLAN: · T-. -Mobile-] Northeast LLC J ORIENT FIRE DEPARTMENT 23300' MAIN ROAD OI~ENT, NY 11~57 I,h "3 ,~: ~ LI-13-883-A ',, ~ ~1 ';'[] ~ ~81TE PLAN DATE: SCALE: AS NOTED Rl NM SHEET NO.: ' _P-:.O.~j~r~. C~r. NO. >. ,, 07-7315 DRAWING NO.: SP-1 .,, 500 OWNER S LIST / ~ / ~ 1000-18-2-24- ~ \ " 1000--18--5--14,1 1000--18--5-13.7 1000--18--2--.20,1 ~, / ,~ / r ~ FLOOD CONTROL '~ ~',..~ ~ VINCENT& T~RESE ~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~% k ~ k ¢~ ¢ ORIENT NY 11957 233 TABOR ROAD ORIENT NY 11957 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o o ~ ~ / MAILING ADDRESS ORIENT NY 11957 MAILING ADDRESS ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ / { 22 J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ X ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 88 MARSHALL A~NUE MAILING ADDRESS 124 ~ST 79~ 12-1TEC~OLOGYD~ SETA~T,~ 11733 / ~ ~/ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~6~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 225 KING SmEET SmEET APT 27C / ~ ~/ ~ '~ ~ - /~~O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ORIENT NY 11957 NEW YORK NY 10024 ~ t t ~: / / w W W . W f e a i a . e 0 m ~ ~ ~oOU S~O¢~ ~ ~ ~ % 9 ¢ ~ ~ 1000--18--5--15.1 ~000_27_1_11 1000--18--2--22.1 /~ ORIENT NY 11957 25045 ROU~ 25 x~ ~ ~ ~ X ~ MAILING ADDRESS ORIENT NY 11957 ~ ~----~ L I ~¥ ~ J 600 YOUNGS AVENUE 41 SCHERMERHORN S~EET MAILING ADDRESS / [ 19 } / , ~' ,,,~/~'~ Lt / ~ -- ~ P (k ~k ~ ~ x X ~- SU~ 25 P 0 BOX 425 / ~ / [ ~*iIj' .... I I I ~ ' ~ " BROOKL~ NY 11201 ORIENT NY 11957 ":I:' ur,,rr,=, I . ~ ~ ~ 1000--18--5--16.1 000--18--2--~ [~ ~ DASD T BULL / Rss DE~C~ / ' ~ ~' ~ / ~ ~ ~ ¢;~':~ ,{ "~. ';"~r l . ~ 'x~ ~ RICHARD OILLOOLY ~ OYSTERPONDS UNION / / J ' ~ ~-.~ '~ ~' ~ '= ' ~ *; Ifil II~ ~P'['?(~/ ~ ' . ~ ~ / --X ORIENT NY 11957 950 TABOR ROAD { ~ ~ FREE SCHOOL h ~ ~ ~ ,~' ~4~;3 ¢' I ' I' II ~',,r,, / MAILING ADDRESS 23405 ROU~ 25 ';%¢.J ¢ ,,'2 ~ ~;~ ~;:1'~!' N, ( 7 ~ RESIDENCE / / % ORIENT NY 11957 DR~ C~ / NIDLAND PARK NJ 07~2 ROU~ 25 *~ i~ ' ~ -- 1000--1~--5--1B.2 ORIENT NY 11~57 I =, . r , ~ ~,, ,~ ~ ~ EDWARD G & -- t.I ~' ~ ~, ~ CA~ERINE A LOPER ,, · o /~ ~ ROBERT & RACHEL 1000--18--2--24 ~~'~ .~.e"~,.. ~ ' ~%~,-~,~ ~ ' ' ,' ¢ X~ 23780 ROU~ 25~ ~ NEW YORK STATE 3 09/10/09 FORREVIE. ,M GD ~ --- ~ / J~~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ % ORIENT NV 11957 f 25 I 23695 ROU~ 25 ~ 09/18/09 SITEP~NAPPLI~TIONFIUNG IM GD --~----~-- '~'- ........ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ MAILING ADDRESS ~00 TABOR ROAD ' ~ I ' 0 o ~ ¢ --¢ d ORIENT NY 11957 MAILING ADDRESS v MAILING ADDRESS 100~18~5-9.~ ~ J Z~ ~ ~. Xx ~LLIAM Y TERRY % RESIDEqCE ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 1000--18--5--18.6 X '~ I ~ ~ ~ 24120 ROUTE 2S ~E CAL~ETON GROUP 1000--18--2--25 / ~ ~~----~ ~'~-- ~ , ~ ~ VACANT X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ORIENT NY 11957 200 TABOR ROAD DAVID S SCHLAGER ~AILING ADDRESS ORIENT NY lt957 23765 ROU~ 25 /'--~./ ; : _ , RESIDEhjT/AL , m . -- ~ k . RESIDENCE 1000--18--5--18.5 ~ ~ ORIENT NY 11957 XlO00~~ ~ BI ///% ~ 24190 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 RUROEDE J: ~ · ~ t ORIENT NY 11957 MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS /~E~CE- '~ ~ I ' I I ~ i ~ /// 1000-18-5-15.8 · ~ ~ -- ' MAILING ADDRESS ROU~ 25 25865 ROU~ 25 /~ ~,.~,~u~ / m m I [ ~ ~ ~ /// 23300 MAIN RO~ ~ ~ 100~-18-5-~8 5 ~ J P 0 BOX 444 ORIENT NY 11957 ORIENT NY 11957 ~ y I _ ~ J ~ ~ ~ I /~/ ORIENT, NY 11"57 ~ ~ ~S'~NO~ ' ~. ~ ORIENT NY 11~57 ~ ; ' 1000--25--2--20.18 /// ~ ~ m x EDWARD J CAUFIELD~ HERNANDEZ ~ 25955 ROUTE 25 ~YPL~: ~ / ~ / ' J WAREHOUSE /// __ ~---- , ~J / ~ JAN'CE NEWMAN 22950 ROUTE 25 ORIENT NY 11957 ._ ~ / m ' ~ /// ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I --:~ /~ 24260 ROU~ 25 ORIENT NY 11957~ MAILING ADDRESS / /m- m .--~ . L13) I, ~ __ -- ~ -- - ~ 1000-18--5-13.7 ~ ~ / I' ./ ORIENT NY 11957 ROU~ 25 / ~ m , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ RESIDENCE ~ X / · . /- MAILING ADDRESS 1000_18_5_9.2 P 0 BOX 546 ~ 205 ~LLETS A~NUE DASD ~ GERALDINE ~ ORIENT NY 11B57 ~ 1000--18--5--18.4 ORIENT NY 11957 LLOYD C THOMAS ~ ROSANNE MAILING ADDRESS JOAN K KALIN ~~ 140 PLA~ ROAD APT ~BJ ORIENT NY 11957 % I/ / / . il 29 BELMONT AVENUE ~ 1000--18--5--9.1 P 0 BOX 246 ~ ~ ~ % ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ / ~ / %~ 1605 ORCHARD STREET 1615 SPRING VALLEY ROAD MAILING ADDRESS NOR~ P 0 BOX 832 1000--18--2--21 22715 ROUTE 25 J ....... 1000 27 1 1 ~ ~ / j t CEMETERY ~ ~ / ", '¢ 2" ORIENT FIRE DEPARTMENT 23 0 ROAD ..... , U-13-883-A VICINITY MAP ZONING LEGEND ',......., Z~ ~0 ZONED RESIDENIALE LOW DENSITY A AS NOTED Z~ ~ ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS (~ ~ VICIN' MAP S; ) 2 LANDMARKS & SCALE: 1"=100'-0" SCENIC B~AYS NM . I NORTH OF (2) PROPOSEDT-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS SET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE DETNL 5/SP-3. HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS EXISTING CONCRETE PAD TO BE REMOVED (I) PROPOSED PPC CABINET MOUNTED ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (1) PROPOSED CPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETNL 4/SP-5 PROPOSED ICE BRIOGE ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD TO ROUTE PROPOSED COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLES TO EXISTING POLE (3) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED 10'-0' CAVilY ATOP EXISTING 90'-0" R,F. COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL MONOPOLE. SEE DEI'NL EXISTING 90'-0" HIGH RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL POLE EQUIPMENT PLAN 30' -0" pRopOSED I (1) PROPOSED Rii~RY CABINET SET ATOP PROPOSED CONCR~i~ PAD. SEE DETNL 5/SP-3. POURED CONCRETE PAD 6'-0' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE WITH PROPOSED 4,'-O' WIDE LOCKABLE SWING GATE PROPOSED TO MATCH EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED 'DARK SKY' COMPLIANT UGHTRXTURE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH CHNN ENK FENCE (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET SET ON PROPOSED CONCRblL PAD (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS SET ON PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (BEYOND) EXISTING METER BANK AND DISCONNECT MOUNTED TO UNISTRUT RACK TO BE UTILIZED FOR PROPOSED T-MOBILE INSTALL 0 4' 1/4-"=1'-o" NORTH ANTENNA TECHNICAL FEATURES MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS DIMENSIONS H x W x D - (INCHES) 55" x 1,3" x 5.15" WEIGHT EXL. MOUNTING HARDWARE (LB) 59.60 WEIGHT MOUNTING HARDWARE (LB) 4-5.7 SURVIVAL WIND SPEED (M/HR) 125 FRONTAL THRUST ((MAX) @ 160KM/H) 177 RADIATING ELEMENT MATERIAL BRASS RADOME MATERIAL FIBERGLASS MOUNTING HARDWARE APM4-O-2 CONNECTOR TYPE I4-I 7r/16-DIN FEMALE ANTENNA MODEL INFO; MANUFACTURER: RFS MODEL NO.: APX16DWV-16DWVL-C MOUNTING BRACKETS (TYPO RF CONNECTORS ANTENNA DETAILS // NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT CABINET SUPPLIED BY CARRIER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. NOT_E; (2) CABINETS TO BE NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT CABINETS SUPPLIED BY T-MOBiLE, AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CAB[NET MANUFACTURER SPECIFrCATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. SPECIFICATIONS: 75-1/8" TALL x 55" WIDE x 27-1/2" DEEP CELL CAPACITY: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT WEIGHT: 1212 LBS ELECTRIC REQUIRED: 250V TO 24-0V PLAN EQUIPMENT CAB. PROPOSES REINFORCED ATFACH CABINET T,'O SUB-BASE SUPPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH ¢ HIGH STRENGTH PROPOSED GPS UNIT BY NAIS MODEL ViC-lO0 A~I'ACHED TO BTS CABINET. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH T--MOBILE RF ENGINEER. POURED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE, GPS L ADAPTER BRACKET AND GASKIET. COAX[AL DIPS UNIT CABLE 1/2" PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET SUB-BASE TO PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD WITH 1/2" S/S RO,DS SET IN HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS. MINIMUM 3-1/2" EMBEDMENT. (TYPO TYPICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS SCALE: 3/z-"= 1 '-0" WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1TECHNOLOGYDRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com KEY PLAN' A~.~!A · -Mobile. Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HIOHWAY SUITE D-20S, GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 r I ~,i ~ ~ MAIN ROAD EQUIPMENT'"PEAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATTERY AND EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS DATE: PROJECT NO.: 05/01/09 07=7315 DRAg/lNG NO.: SCALE: AS NOTED RT SHEET NO.: 4 OF 6 SP-3 (S) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED 10'-0' CAVlW ATOP EXISTING 90'-0' R.F. COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL MONOPOLE. SEE DETAIL 2/SP-3 WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP (3) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WI.T, HI.N. PROPOSED 10'-0" CAVITY ATOP EXISTING 12-1TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 90-0 R.F. COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 MONOPOLE. SEE DETAIL 2/SP-3 ~ T.O. PROPOSED MONOPOLE ADDITION~ "~T.O. PROPOSED MONOPOLE ADDITION ~ ?"¢~ ' I T.o. PROPOSED T-MOBILE T.O. PROPOSED T-MO ILE ANTENNAS -.---- pAD. ¢~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS *RAD [ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS -- ~ :~o' o" AG, ~:~o-o" AGL ~ EXISTING 90'-0" HIGH R.F. COMPATIBLE 1 0~/20/0~ FOI~REVIE~ IM GD MPATIBLE 2 08/20/05 FOREEVIE~ IM GD CONCEALMENT MATERIAL POLE. I BOTFOM DIAMETER = 42" i TOP DIAMETER = 26,625"-- I , / / EXISTING AN EN A BY OTHERS TO REMAIN EXISTING FIREHOUSE ~ ~ PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE AIOP ~ ~ I PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE ATOP PROPOSED / / / / /- (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS / / / / / sET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE PROPOSED T-MOBI~ EOUIPMENT C~IN~. X ~ ~ I ~ / / / / FIGURE MOUN~D TO PROPOSED 6'-0" NIGN /// uG~ R~RE ~OU~D TO PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ ~ I. / / / F (1) PROPOSED UU~ C~IN~ S~ ATOP PENCE Wl~ PROPOSED 4'-¢ WIDE ~ ~ ~ ~ m T.O. PROPOSEB EQUIPMENT CABIN~ ~T.O. PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ~IN~ N 0 r~ h ~a ~ ~ L LC S~ ATOP PROPOSED CONCR~E P~. SEE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~B ~E~TMENT , ' ~ EX~STING M~ER BANK AND DISCONNECT ._ -__. X X X X MOUNTEB TO UNISTRUT RACK TO BE UTILIZED (1) "ROPOSED'mm~RY~BIN~ S~ATO" / / FOR PROPOSED T-MOBILE INSTALL PROPOSED CONCEblb P~ -~- ~ PROPOSED CONCR~E "~ ~ ~ ~% ;;;;%'PROPOSED CONCR.E p~ : ::;: ~'~: "O'TH AND SOUTH ELEVAT'ONS P'OJECT NO.: EXISTING POLE FOUNDATION 05/01/89 07-7315 AS NOTED NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"= 1 '-0" SCALE: 1/8"= 1 '-0" s~o.: 50F6 (3) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED 10'-0' CAVn~ ATOP EXISTING (3) PROPOSED T-MOBiLE ANTENNAS MOUNTED 90'-0" R.F. COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL V¢ ][ L L ][ A ~V[ F. C 0 L L ~ N S, A [ A MONOPOLE. SEE DETNL 2/SP-3 WITHIN PROPOSED 10'-0" CAVITY ATOP EXiSTING ~ ~ .J-- 90'-0" R.F. COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL g MONOPOLE. SEE DETNL 2/SP-3 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUI~ET, NY 11733 4-100'-0" AGL~k at,:E100'-0" AGL VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8,459 -- T.O. PROPOSED MONOPOLE ADDmON-/~T.O. PROPOSED MONOPOLE ADDITION +g9'-6' AOLrl~ ~4-99'-6' AGL T.O. PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS-/ ~T.O. PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ~' 4-97'-5' ACLu2~ 4-97'-3' AGL NAD. ~. OF PROPOSED T-MOBiLE ANTENNAS'~ ~RAD. ~. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ~T.O. EXISTING POLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL,POLE. 1 05/20/09 FO~I~VlEW IM GD PROPOSED 'DARK SKY' COMPLIANT LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE PROPOSED 'DARK SIC¢ COMPUANT (1) PROPOSED (;PS UNIT MOUNTED TO LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ~ PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. 6"-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENOE~ ~ SEE DETAIL 3/SP-.~ \ (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS KEY?LAN: PROPOSED 6"-0" HIGH CHNN LINK ~ SET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD, SEE FENCE Wl~ PROPOSED 4°-0" WIDE % DETAIL 5/SP-3. LOCKABLE SWING GATE PROPOSED TO ~ (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET SET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (1) PROPOSED CPS UNIT MOUNTED TO % N PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. ~ ~ [ (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS ~ ~ PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE ATOP PROPOSED SET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE ~ ~ CONCRETE PAD TO ROUTE PROPOSED COAXIAL DETNL 5/SP-3 ----~ ~ ANTENNA CABLES TO EXISTING POLE (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET SET ATOP ~ % PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD ~ ~ NORTH · 7'--5" AGL~:~ ~:1:7'-5" AGL RACK TO BE UTILIZED FOR · · · · · PROPOSED ICE BRIDGE ATOP ~6'-0" AGLd~ ah~6'-O" AGL £ PROPOSED T-MOBILE INSTALL PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD TO ROUTE '.~ PROPOSED COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLES ~, ~' T.O. PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE'/ ~T,O. PROPOSED CHNN LINK FENCE i or[h cast I LC " -' -'ORIENT"I IRE DEPARTMENT PROPDSEO CABINET SET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD ,, '~ ¢,, '~'~ 23~0 I~AIN ROAD ,', ~" ..~--OBENT,, NY 11957 EXISTING POLE FOUNDATION 883-A (1) PROPOSED BA'B'ERY CABINET SET ATOP TITLE~ PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD EAS~T~-AND ELEVATIONS EXISTING POLE FOUNDATION (1) PROPOSED PPC CABINET MOUNTED ATOP PROPOSED CONDRETE PAD DATE: PROJECT i'40.: 05/01/09 07-7315 SC,~d.E: D P,~.VFFN~3 NO.: AS NOTED f~T .-,,= SCALE: 1/8"= 1 '-0" Northeast L! C 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 [THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE] 27245 MAIN RD.. CUTCHOGUE. NY I 1935 PAUL LaPASOTA cm!91~ , NORTH DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 BLOCK: 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE: N 4-1' 00' 51" ZONING: R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY) LONGITUDE: W 72' 29' 15" NAD: 85 AMSL: 20' LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAWLAND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 400 SQ,FT.:c EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S12000 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINETS, (1) BAI~ERY CABINET, (1) UMTS CABINET AND (1) PPC CABINET (8) ANDREW: TMBXX-6516-R2M PROPERTY CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: TOM WICKHAM (651) 765-5454 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 (651) 548-7042 LIPA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 3500 SUNRISE H~', SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, N.Y. 11739 PAUL LAPASOTA (651) 224-6651 MARIANA NEITO (651) 224-6600 TITLE SHEET 10/15/08 1l/0,3/09 VlCIN~ PLAN 10/15/08 11/05/09 SITE PLAN 10/15/08 11/05/09 EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BAlq'ERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS AND PLANTING DETAIL 10/1.3/08 NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONS lO/15/o8 NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 10/15/08 MARIANA NEITO NORTH HOWARD LEGER HOWARD LEGER WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVB S~TAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE : 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com DATE REVISION 11/10/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 12/16/08 DATE ]SSL~D TO DATE ~ TO ~ REVIEW FILING FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING FOR REVIEW FOR FILING FOR FILING FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 11/05/09 11/05/09 · T-. -Mobile- Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE ......... :::;~ '2724,5'71~ ROAD __ ...... OUTCHO'C=.I~E, NY 11~35 ~ ,~.--- ~'~.: ..... 18/08/08 87-7199 AS NOTEB ~ NO.: 1 OF 6 DRAWING NO.: T-1 x~ xx~ /~// xx WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ~ ~X 1 -STORY A R C H I T E C T S, LLP x - / ~ ~, x ~ ~ NO. ~ ~ON ~' ~ ~, 1-~ORY R~IOENCE // ~ ~/ ~ R~IDENCE x X / , / 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 04129109 FOR F]LIN$ ~ I ~ ~ OF WO~~ ~OR~ / I ~-~ORY "'. : .- ,,~ ~,_.o~ , ~, /,_..~ , , ~-.Mobile- ~ ~ GR[AT RIV[R, ~Y 1~9 ~ ~ :' ' ' ' OU~BO. GUE,~NY fl935 ~ r ~ A~ ~ ~ ' ¢ ~'~' L1-~8-807-0 INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURV~ PREPARED BY: BARRLIll, BONACCl AS NOTED AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURV~ORS, P~NNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIIVE HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 PHONE: (651) 435-1111 JOB NO. A070628 DATED AUGUST 2007 0 35' 70' 140'~ CT wa. w ..A. .o.A.X .. o, S;? SUFFOLK, R~L PROPER~ TAX SERVICE AGENCY, COUN~ CENTER, RJVERHEAB, NY 11901. 1"=70' NM SCALE: 1 '=70'-0" ~ATEb JUNE 5TH, 2007 NORTH s.~c uo., ' ' 20F6 PROPERTY LINE WILLIAM E COLLIN8, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP EXISTING WOOD FENCE 12-1 TECHNOLOOY DRIVE I~TAIJK~T, VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-6~-8459 http://www.wfclia.com //'.2: / d., ~{ ~s '?:, ":~ * ~e ~* '~ ~o ,, ~ SEE 1/SP-3 FOR MORE INFORMATION ~ ~ ~u ~.~ ~ EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING DA~ ~ ~ DA~ POTION OF ~l~lNG CHURCH STEEPLE TO q/~0/08 i FOR REVIEW x ~ BE REMOVED AND REP~CED WITH PROPOSED ASSEMB~ TO M~CH EXI~NG CHURCH 12116/08:OR REVIEW ~EEPLE IN A~ R~PE~ 12/16/0~:O~ FILING WI~IN PROPOSED RF COMPA~B~ CONC~mE~ *O~7 ~ OENE~LY ~TC. EX~NO ~EEP~ (WP. (2) / PER SECTOR). SEE D~NL 2/SP-5 ~ OF .Mobile- Northeast LLC x L~.27, x THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE ~, 2~ M~AD FACILI ........... , NOTES CUTCHOG~E, NY~ ~: , ~, ~[E PLAN CONC~E CURB ~ DRAINAGE INL: / STRUCTURE B) THE PROPOSED PUBUC UTILI~ WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACtLI~ IS UNMANNED AND WILL BE VISITED ,i ~IOV ~ ~': ~ ~ ADDiTiONAL NOISE, FUMES, VIBRATIONS, DUST, ODORS O~ TRAFFIC -- WALL q SIGN C) NO ADDmO~AL PARKING IS REQUI~ED FO~ THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS A~ ~NMANNED SITE. x x~ WIRE FENCE ~ STRUCTURE - DRAINAGE E) NO WATER O~ SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE R~UIRED FOR TH~ PROPOSED USE. ~}~..,,%, JO/08/0g' ~'~'~ ........................ ~,07 7~99 : ~ STOCKADE FENCE ~ ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX ~ D~O ~O.: ~ ~ PICK~ FENCE ~ TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX F) THE~E WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL O~ R~AIL SIGNS, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE PROPOSED SITE. [.~:~:~:~:~:~] CONCR~E ~ WATER VALVE G) FiRE PROTECTION AND SECURI~ PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORING OF THE SUBJECT SITE. INFORMATIoNNOTE: SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON~ D~ ~: AS NOTED TREE LINE ~ FIRE HYDRANT H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILI~ SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE A SURV~ PREPARED BY: BARRY, BONACCI 0 10' 20' 40' CT OF NEW YORK STATE AND NFPA 70, FOR ELECTRICAL WORK AND GROUNDING. AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURV~ORS, ~ ~.~ ~: ~o HEDGE ~c ~../ TOP / BOSOM OF CURB P~NNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE "c ~ I) THE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA MOUNT STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE CONSIDE~TION OF NM SITE PLAN 8 TREE 55.43 SPOT EL~ATION ICING. FURTHER, THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE '" ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 16, CHAPTER 17, CHAPTER NY 11788 PHONE: (651) 435~1111 dOB .0. 1"=20' SCALE: 1 "=20'-0" ~ MONUMENT 18, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION 3108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. A070628 DATED AUGUST 50, 2007 NORTH ~ ~0.: (14) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING ! ~ I .... ~J .... ~ ~ .............. PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE m ~ ~ ~ ~-EXISTrNG WOOD 8" ~ ,~ (1) PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ I TO REMAIN {~ELOW) -MFG: ~NDREW - DEC~BEL ~ECHAEICAL INFO ~IN~ ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m -PART LO.: TMBXX-6516-R2M 4 -WEIGHT: 54.6 LBS. i ~FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH ANDREW TEL~ILT¢ -MAX. WIND LOAD (~IOOMPH): 164 LBF REMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA SYSTEM --- -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH CAP WOOD RAMP WITH ~ ~ / ~ ~ % / ; -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED EXISTING HANBI -CONNECTOR ~PE: 7-16 BIN, FEMALE -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 (1) PROPO , ; DUN~GE " (1) PROPOSED UM~ ~ MOUN~D ON PROPOSED EQUIPME~ ' ~ / % / i ~ ~ ~ ~BIN~ ATOP PROPOSE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PRIVACY DUNNAGE ~ W ] L ~ [ A ~ E C 0 EGUIP~EN ~ (2) PRO.OS[D PROPOSE BOOSTER CABIN~ DUNNAGE ATOP PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ ~-I ~O~ D~ ~TAU~r, PROPOSE EQUIPME~ DUN~GE J ~ ~ t ~ : / / W W W . (~. FOR -MOBILE EQUIPMENT PROPOSE . TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW REAR VIEW _,''.. ~ DUN~GE 1) PROPOSED GPS FRONT VIEW ' ANTENNA DETAILS PROPOSE EE B~N~ ~/~=-] SCALE: 1 ~I~IN¢ PROPOSE ~I~NG ROPOSED T-MOBILE NOTE: LE T~Y MOUNTED (2) CABIN.S TO BE NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT 0 ~ W~L OF / NORTEL ~2000 EQUIPMENT CABIN.S SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE, AND INSTALLED BY XI~IN8 CHUROH~ CABIN~ SUPPLIED BY CARRIER, CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ MANUFACTURER UI~IN~ ~D TO BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. SPECIFICATIONS AND B~WlNGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. ~0. ~A~ ~0~ N~ED TO MATCH 2 ll/10/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS XI~NO E~ERIOR / 75-1/8" TALL x WIDE x 27-1/2" DEEP 4 12/16/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS UILDIN¢ WALL/ CELL CAPACI~: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT , WEIGHT: 1212 LBS EQUIPMENT PLAN I i % m ..... NORTH ~ ~ T ~ ~ ' ~ / ~ I ~ 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW T / ~ ~ ~ 12/16/08 FOR FILING / ~ ~ PLAN · EQUIPMENT ~AB. ¢ ¢¢ ¢-' ~q % / ~ ~ /, i~ ~ / X m / PROPOSED GPS UNIT BY / J j ~ / % m NAIS MODEL VIC-lO0 / ~ I I / % % ..... ,' / CABIN~. COORDINATE / m / m I m mEXACT / -_ .OCAT,O.W,T ~ ~COAXIAL GPS UNIT CABLE / / ~' ¢ Noctheast LLC / ~ ~ ~500 SUNRISE HWY. SCAL~: 3/4"~1'-0" 1/2"~ E.E. BOLTS AN~ SADDLE CLIP FASTENERS. J / ~ ~ SUITE NEW 6' TALL (MINIMUM) AMERICAN 1/2"¢ RUBBER HOSE AND 12 GA. GALV. WIRE ~ ~ \ / ............... .;,~, ARBORVITAE ..... ~ERGREEN TREES P~NTED / PROVIDE TURN BUCKLES (3) OR TWIST ADJUSTMENT. xX // ON ~/A-5. (GUARANTEE TREES FOR A /L / ~ / "" "" %¢INSTALL STAINLESS STEEL ,,,,, ¢ ;__'_..L,,-____~ HO~ JE / SEPARATION SHE~ BETWEEN ,~.,, .... PERIOD OF ONE YEAR)~ kI EQUIPMENT CABIN~ AND ~0%/ -5 ~ ~ ~-~-,,, , ~CEDAR BARK CHIPS (V.I.F.) OR EQUIVALENT ~ I STEEL GRATING, ~ , /~ 27245 MAIN (5) CEDAR STAKES DRIVEN AND ~ ~/~ / x / ~ CLTGHOGUE/N~ 11985 P RAW U STRA' ~ HTI STA~ ESSET AT ~ 4 ~% / ~ k . ~ ,, , ; 120' INTERVALS AND EQUAL DISTANT BACKFILL WITH TOPSOIL MIXED WITH _,~ X/ , ~ ~ , ~ ...... FROM TREE ~ ~'~ ~w~-.~,~, ~ // ~ / / 0/20/0 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF [ [ mm ~ ~ I~ / / (5) POUNDS PER YARD. WATER~ ~ o ~ ~ / 5 ~ %~/ EARTH LINE ON TREE TRUNK. ~ ~ ~~ & ~ PRUNED IN ACCORBANC~~~ I1~ ~ ~ STEEL ~UNNAeE ~OUNT ~ ~ ~,, ~~:~'~':'~' .... ~' "'~ '~ SABBLECRATING CLIpWITH FASTENERS.1/2"¢ H,S. BOLTS AND ~ ~ CT / \ / \ / \ / k / EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE ,:- +65'-0 AGL (B) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED Wn'HIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETAIL 2/SP-3 ~ ~ FRAMING ~SEMBLY ~RIAL TO ~TCH EXI~ING ~ ~ o W ~ ~ ~ o m ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~TEN~S PROPOSED ~TEN~ C~ ROUTED UP-THROUGH : ~ ~ ~ EXI~NG CHURCH BUILDING A~C INTO ~EP~ ~r ~ (1) PROPOSED GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED SIDE OF CHURCH BUI~ING. PROPOSED ~B~ T~Y . TO BE PAleD TO ~TCH APP~NCE OF EXI~ING E~IOR BUILDIN~ ~ALL (2) PROPOSED T-~OBILE EQUIPMENT C~IN~ ATOP PROPOSED C~N ENK FENCE Wire PRIVACY S~ ~D 4'-0" ~ --- I -- t~: (,~/ [~ ~ ~ I (1~) PROPOSED ARBO~T~ SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPME~ DUN~GE. MOUN~D ON PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUN~GE SEE D~NL 4/SP-5 (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ~WE~ C~mN~ ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PROPOSED EQUIPME~ DUN~GE (B~OND) ~~' DUNNAGE. SEE D~NL 5/SP-5PROPOSED '~V. STEEL [~UIP~[NT DUNNAGE EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS ~ T.O. PROPOSED FENCE ~ ~O. DA~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T-MOBI~ EQUIPMENT 4 12/16/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS GRADE 10113/08 FOR REVIEW 11103/09 FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW EX~ST~N~ CHURCH STEEPLE ', T.O. OF EXISTIND STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~TEN~ MOUSED WI~IN PROPOSED RF COMPATIB~ CONC~E~ ~R~ CHURCH ~EEP~ ~SEMBLY TO ~TCH EXI~ING ~EEP~ ~ ~ ~TCHED ~ INDI~TES POTION OF EXI~NG ~EEP~ m BE REMOVED o ~ ~D REP~CED W~H PROPOSED RF COMPA~BLE CONC~LMENT SCREENING ~ ~ ~MINO ~SEMBLY ~TERIAL m ~TCH EXI~NG ~ ~ ~ ]~j~ jj~ ~ ~ ~54'-4' AGL~ PROPOSED ~TENNA CAB~ ROUND UP-THROUGH z AOL~ · - ob le ~ ~ PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE Wl~ PRIVACY S~ ~D 4'-0" GATE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBI~ EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (14) PROPOSED ARBORVIT~ SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT BUI~ING. PROPOSED CAB~ T~Y TO BE PAINED TO ~TCH ~P~NCE ~ ~ OF ~I~ING E~ERIOR BUILDING W~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (1) PROPOSED OPS UN~ MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ,500SUNEISEHWY. T-MOBI~ EQUIPMENT ~BIN~. SEE D~AIL ~/SP-5 SUITE D-205 (2) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ EQUIPMENT CABIN~ ATOP GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 ~ ~ ~ ~ % ~ ~ ~ m"' ~_~ ~' ~ ~ PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE D~NL 4/SP-3 ~%~ ~ -~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / %-% 'c~ ~ ~ (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ~ERY ~BIN~ ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT EX STING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS '."(l [ CUTCHOGUE ~ - 6 2009 ,.'._ , 27245 MAIN ~AD / T.O. PROPOSED m - - -- _ : -- ~ T-MOBILE EQUIPME~ GRADE CT SOUTHEAST ELEVATION EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETAIL 2/SP-5 HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF EXISTING STEEPLE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT SCREENING FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP-THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATnC INTO '-i~-EPLE PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL NORTHEAST ELEVATION PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND 4%0" GATE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (14.) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL ~-/SP-3 (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATIERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (BEYOND). SEE DETAIL 3/SP-5 (1) PROPOSED PPC CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS SOUTHWEST ELEVATION i65'-0 AGL T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE +54'-4.' AGL ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ¢. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS- (1) PROPOSED GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETAIL 5/SP-3 (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETNL 5/SP-3 (14.) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE SURROUNDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. SEE DETAIL 4./SP-3 (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE UMTS CABINET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE PROPOSED CHAIN UNK FENCE WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND 4.'-0" CATE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT DUNNAGE. :E9'-9" ~ T.O. PROPOSED FENCE~' & PROPOSED SHRUBS ±8'-11" T.O. PROPOSED~ T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 T.O. OF EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE GRADE EXISTING STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT MATERIAL CHURCH STEEPLE ASSEMBLY TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS (3YP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DETNL 2/SP-3 i54.'-4." AGL,a~_ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS'"' · 47'-4" AGL~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILEANTENNAS HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF EXISTING STEEPLE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED 'WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT SCREENING FRAMING ASSEMBLY MATERIAL PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED INTO STEEPLE UP-THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATTIC ~9"-9"~ T.O. PROPOSED FENCEN" & PROPOSED SHRUBS ~8'-11"~ T.O. PROPOSED~ T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT GRADE WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T 8, LLP 12-1 'I'F.C~NOLOG:Y DRlV~ ~i~LT~T, NY U'733 VOICE : 631-689-84~0 FAX : http://www.wfcaia.com CONSULT~IT: ~ON AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FILING 11/10/O8 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING FOR REVIEW FOR FILING FOR FILING FOR REVIEW KEY · T.. -Mobile. Northeast LLC ~500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 NOV - 6 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH .................. OF'i, (~UTCHOGUE ,, \u' ~_, :;I 245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGLE, NY 11935 2oo9 I'- ' U-13-807-C I NORTHEAST AND SOIJTHWEST ELEVATIONS I:IA~ ~ NO.: 10/08/08 07-7199 SC~ DP, A:WING NO.: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: CT SP 5 NM ~ 6 OF Northeast I LC WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY I1739 [THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUEJ 27245 MAIN RD., CUTCHOGUE. NY I 15235 PAUL LaPASOTA NORTH DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 BLOCK: 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE: N 41' 00' 51" ZONING: R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSI~O LONGITUDE: W 72" 29' 15" NAD: 6~ AMSL: 20' LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAWLAND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 400 SQ.FT.:E EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S18020 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINETS, (1) UMTS CABINET AND (1) PPC CABINET (8) ANDREW: TMBXX-6516-R2M PROPERTY CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT; TOM WICKBAM (631) 765-5454 THE PRESBTFERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 (6,31) 548-7042 LIPA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC %MOBILENORTHEAST LLC PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: 3500 SUNRISE H g(/Y, SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, N.Y. 11739 PAUL LAPASOTA (631) 224 6651 MARIANA NEITO (631) 224-6600 TITLE SHEET VICINITY PLAN SITE PLAN EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BA~q'ERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS AND PLANTING DETAIL NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONS NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS (1) BATrERY CABINET, 10/13/08 ~0/13/0B 10/13/08 10/13/08 10/13/06 01/06/09 01/06/09 01/06/09 01/06/09 Ol/O6/O9 01/06/09 12-1 TECI'-INOLOGY DRIVE ~ETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE : 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com MARIANA NEITO NORTH HOWARD LEGER HOWARD LEGER CONSULTANT: REV]SiON 11/10/08 ~ AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 12/16/08 i AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 11/19/09 ISSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW 12/30/09 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01/06/10 FOR REVIEW 01/06/09 FOR FILING ]Bl&'rg ~&gUgD TO 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING 04/29/0~ FOR FILING 10/15/0g FOR REVIEW AR~ OF 11/03/09 11/18/09 FOR FILING FOR REVIEW Ir[~1 I .Mobile. Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-20S OREAT RIVER, i~Y 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE .... .. '--:~-':'- 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOC-:-:-~E, NY 11935 "' ~, ' ~L_ ~,' 'i'/ L1-13-807-C TITLE SHEET 10/08/08 AS NOTED ~IP~,T NO.: I~OIF. CW ' NO.: ' 07-7199 DRAWING CT T-I 1OF ~ VlCINI PLAN 2-STORY RESIDENCE \ \ \ \ / \ \ 1 -STORY RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE RESIDENC/C/C~ / / 2-STORY RESIDENCE / / 1-STORY RESIDENCE ~ ~/ 2-STORY RESIDENCE -STORY ~ STORY / RESIDENCE -STORY ~ESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE I 2-STORY \ \ RESIDENCE 1 -STORY \ RESIDENCE \ 1 -STORY RESIDENCE .~ RESIDENCE 1 -STORY L RESIDENCE \ 1-STORY \ ~ / / RESIDENCE 1 NOTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARRETT, BONACCl AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 PHONE: (631) 435-1111 dOB NO. A070628 DATED AUGUST 30, 2007 INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN iS BASED UPON A TAX MAP PREPARED BY COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY, COUN~ CENTER, RIVERHEAD, NY 11901. DATED JUNE 5TH, 2007 0 1 "=70' 35' 70' 140' NORTH WILLIAM F. COLLIN8~ AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12'-1 '~.CHNOI..OGY DRIVE ~TAUKE , NY 11733 VOICE: 631--689-8450 FAX: 631--68~-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com C01~JEE,TANT: 11/10/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 12/16/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 11/19/09 ISSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW 12/30/09 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01/06/09 ISSUED FOR FILING 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING 04/29/0 FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 11/18/09 FOR FILING FOR REVIEW AREA OF WORK · T-..Mobile- Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE r":27245 M'AJN ROAD CUTCHOGLE, NY 11935 U 13 807 C , i 2otc PlaN ,~. ] 10/08/08 07-7199 DRAWIHG AS NOTED DRAWN BY: CT CHECKED BY: NM 2 OF~ SP-1 SITE PLAN ~ 1 "=20'-0" LEGEND .% % % .¢ 270' % % \ \ \ \ \ \\ R~ 00' L~39.27, FACILITY NOTES CONCRETE CURB DROP CURD WALL EDGE OF PAVEMENT WIRE FENCE STOCKADE FENCE PICKET FENCE CONCRETE TREE LINE HEDGE TREE MONUMENT DRAINAGE INLET / STRUCTURE DRAINAGE INLET / STRUCTURE SIGN LIGHT POLE STRUCTURE - DRAINAGE ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT TOP / BO]TOM OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION A) PROPOSED FEATURES LABELED AS SUCH; ALL ELSE EXISTING OR FUTURE BY OTHERS, B) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND WILL DE VISITED APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO GENERATE ADDITIONAL NOISE, FUMES, VIBRATIONS, BUST, ODORS OR TRAFFIC, C) NO ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. D) NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE. F) THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL SIGNS, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE PROPOSED SITE. G) FIRE PROTECTION AND SECURITY PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORING OF THE SUBJECT SITE. H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE AND NFPA 70, FOR ELECTRICAL WORK AND GROUNDING. I) THE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA MOUNT STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE CONSIDERATION OF iCING. FURTHER, THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 16, CHAPTER 17, CHAPTER 18, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION 5108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. 0 ~ECTOR ]90' NOTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARRETT, BONACCl AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 PHONE: (631) 435-1111 JOB NO. A070628 DATED AUGUST 30, 2007 PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WOOD FENCE PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT AREA, SEE 1/SP-3 FOR MORE INFORMATION · PROPOSED CABLE TRAY TO ROUTE ANTENNAS UP INTO EXISTING ATHC AND TO PROPOSED ANTENNAS EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING REMOYE AREAS OF EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE FOR ANTEIINA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATD~IALS TO BE REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. SEE ELEVATIONS SP-4 & S?-5 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. OYP. 2 PER SECfOR) SEE DETNL 2/SP-3. 0 1 O' 20' 40' 1 "=20' NORTH WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE 8ETAUI~T. NY 11733 VOICE: (~1--689-8450 FAX: 631--~9-8459 ht tl~://www.w f caia.eom CONSULTANT= AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS SSUED FOR 8RPO REVIEW FOR REVIEW 8SUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/15/08 FOR REVIEW 12/1<5/08 FOR FILING FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW FOR FILING =OR REVIEW ,AREA OF WORK- · T-. -Mobile- Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-203 6REAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN I~DAD CUTCHQGUE, ,NY 11935 LH3-807-C I'!"~'", ~ ' -',; 2010 I~ DATE: I ~ NO.: ~ 10/08/08 07-7199 SCAL~, . ' DRAWING NO.: AS NOTED o'Sp2 NM (12) PROPOSED ARBORViTAE AD~ACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETNL 4./SP-3 -- SUPPORT POSTS WITH PROPOSED HORIZONTAL TRACK TO GUIDE SUDING GATES EXISTING WOOD PICKET FENCE PROPER~ LINE PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE TO SCREEN PROPOSED MEIER / DISCONNECT & VERIZON TRANSECTOR CABINET. PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISIAUT RACK PROPOSED ELECTRIC M~ILR / DISCONNECT SWiTCH PANEL MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT RACK PROPOSED DARK SKY COMPEANT EGHT ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE PPC CABINET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BArrERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 PROPOSED WHITE VINYL FENCE MOUNTED ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PAD WiTH (2) 21'-6" SEDING GATES MOUNTED IN FRONT OF PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PAD. (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (1) PROPOSED CPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETNL 5/SP-3 (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE DETNL 5/SP-3 (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED CONCRLIL PAD EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EQUIPMENT PLAN PLAN ~ EQUIPMENT CAB. 5'-6" 2'-6" TYP. BA'I-FERY CABINET DETAILS SCAL£: 3/4"-- 1 '-0" NEW REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE, SEE POURED CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD DETAIL. SECURE NEW T-MOBILE B,A~ERY CABINET TO NEW CONCRETE PAD WITH 3/4" S/S RODS SET IN HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS. MINIMUM 3-1/2" EMBEDMENT. (TYP.) NORTH NEW 6' TALL (MINIMUM) AMERICAN ARBORVITAE EVERGREEN TREES PLANTED @ 5'-0" O.C. TO BE PLUMB AS SHOWN ON 1/A-5. (GUARANTEE TREES FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR) (3) CEDAR STAKES DRIVEN AND DRAWN STRAIGHT. STAKES SET AT 120' INTERVALS AND EQUAL-DiSTANT FROM TREE NOTE: BARE ROOT PLANTS WILL NOT BE PERMH~-ED. ALL PLANTING TO BE PRUNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST ACCEPTED NURSERYMAN'S PRACTICE 1/2"¢ RUBBER HOSE AND 12 GA. GALV. WIRE PROVIDE TURN BUCKLES (5) OR TWIST ADJUSTMENT. BARK CHIPS (V.I.F.) OR EQUIVALENT -- BACKFILL WITH TOPSOIL MIXED WITH 0/20/0 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF (5) POUNDS PER YARD. WATER THOROUGHLY AND FILL TO EXISTING EARTH LINE O,N TREE TRUNK. TYP. PLANTING DETAIL SUBSOIL ANTENNA -MFD: ANDREW - DECIBEL -PART NO.: TMBXX-6516-R2M -~:45' DUAL BAND QUAD ANTENNA · _FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH ANDREW TELETILT_® R_EMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA SYSTEM Bm MECHANICAL INFO -WEIGHT: 34.6 LBS. -MAX. WIND AREA: 2.9 SQ.FT. -MAX. WIND LOAD (@1OOMPH): 164 LBF -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED -CONNECTOR TYPE: 7-16 DIN, FEMALE (4) -COLOR: OFF WHITE -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW ~EAR VIEW FRONT VIEW ANTENNA DETAILS 1'---o= -- NORTEL S18020 EQUIPMENT CABINET SUPPLI,ED BY CARRIER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 4'-5 1/64" .~ PLAN ~ EOUIPMENT CAE NOTE: (2) BATFERY PLINTHS TO BE NORTEL SlBOOOBP SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S18000BP: 19" HIGH x 55" WIDE x 44" BEEP BAEIERY CAPACITY: 170 Ah TO 540 Ah HVAC CAPACITY: 190 WA~S-COOLINO & 250 W HEATING WEIGHT: 1522 LBS (273 LBS WITHOUT BAlq'ERIES) 4'-3 1/2" PLAN ~ BATTERY PLINTH NOTE: EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO BE NORTEL S18020 SUPPLIED BY AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S18020: 59-5/64" TALL x 55-1/64" WIDE x 28-15/16" DEEP CELL CAPACITY: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT WEIGHT: 1114.28 LBS ELECTRIC REQUIRED: 208-240 VAC +10%, FREQUENCY 45-65 Hz CPS UNIT BY NAIS MODEL ViC-lO0 ATrACHED TO BTS CABINET. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH T-MOBILE RF ENGINEER. L ADAPTER BRACKET AND GASKEE. COAXIAL DPS ANTENNA CABLE INSTALL MOUNTING ANCHORS PROVIDED BY INSTALLER INTO (4) MOUNTING HOLES DRILLED, USING BASE AS A TEMPLATE- NEW REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE SLAB ~.[3~ ON GRADE. SEE POURED CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD DETAIL. SECURE NEW T-MOB~ILE S18000BP BAKERY PLINTH TO NEW CONCRETE PAD WITH 1/2" DROP IN WEDGE ANCHOR (TYP.) TYPICAL E_Qo, IPMENT CABINET DETAILS WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA AR C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 ~0~ DRIVE ~TADKET, NY 11733 VOICE : 631"689-8450 FAX: 631'-689-8459 lat t p://WWW.W f caia.¢om CONSULTANT: REVISION AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS ISSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW ISSUED FOR RILING 11/10/08 FOR FILING FOR REVIEW · T...Mobile. Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-2OS GR~T RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 U-13-807-C EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS TYPICAL BATTERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET DETALS AND PLANTING DETAL DA'I~ '¢~ Pt~ NO.: ' 10/08/08 07-7199 SCAI~J, DRAWING NO.: · "\ , AS NOTED SP-3 (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN W I L ]', J A ),/[ J~. C~ 0 L 1~ I ]~J ,~ A I A EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR)SEE A R C H DETAIL 2/SP-3. 12-1 TECI-I~OLOGY DR1V~ SETAUI~T, HATCHED AREA [HD[CATES PORT[ON OF ¥OIC~; 631--6~9-8450 FA~ ~ 63~--6~-~ STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO it t t 1~ : / / W w w'. W f ¢ ~. i a · ¢ 0 m ::L65'-0 AGL W', ACCOMODATE PROPOSEB ANTENNA T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH I / T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE ,J EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE STEEPLECONCEAI-blENTIN ~LLTOREsPECTs.MATCH EXISTING JJ ! (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN ~ II I~ DETAIL 2/sP-3' -- C.URC. STEEPLE. 2 PER SE OR) SEE It HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE ~ hl~,l~,~h// ~ ' -- Co~?~ AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH //-J~! !!II ,~ ::E54'-4" AGL i1~ ~ ::E54'-4" AGL ~ PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING / I [I J.~ [ / ~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ~ ~ [[ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ~ STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS.- ~-31 ~ o PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH ~ .~._ ,. ~ ' ~ ~ EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATrIC INTO STEEPLE '~ ~J ~ c~ I !~iI ~ i, ~ ~ ~ ~ NO. DATE ~.EVtSlON PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO ~ -~- ~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ' ~- ~ S~BE o~ C.URCH BU~LD~,G. PROPOSED ~ ~,~ ~ ~'~ '~ ~o ~ DE PROPOSED T-MOBiLE ANTE,.AS ~ 12/1&/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 911/19/09 ISSUED FOR SHPO [REVIEW CABLE TRAY TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ~ ~;~ - -- . ~ EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE - 1201/06/09 SSUED FOR FILING PROPOSED DARK SKY T~SECTOR BOX / / ~-- il\ ~ _~ ~ ~ [] ~] T-MOB,LE EQU,PMENT ..... ........ ~_--_-- , T-MO Northeast LLC GE£AT RIV£R, NY 1175S PROPOS[D 6'-0' HIGH WHIT[ VINYL FENCE TO II ~ \ \ X X X SCREEN PROPOSED METER / DISCONNECT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAB. SEE D~L S/BP-3 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ~\ \ \ ~ PROPOSED ELE~R,C METER / D~SCO.NECT SW~TCH OF CUTCHOGUE /\\ PA.EL .O..TE. TO PROPOSE. U.,STRUT RAC ~ \ \ (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BA'I'rERY CABINET ATOP 27245 MAIN ROAD / \ ~ PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ~ \~ (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE PPC CABINET MOUNTED ATOP U-13-807-C ~ ~ (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE UM'rS CABINET MOUNTED ATOP PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT AREA BEYOND ~ PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD NORTHWEST & ~ BUILDING.PROPOSEDpjR~POsEDT MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE WITH (2) 21'-6"t~ CABLE TRAY TO BE PAINTED TO SOUTHEAST ELEVAI'ION~ MATCH APPEARANCE SMDING GATES IN FRONT OF PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. ~ OF EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL ,10/08/08 07-7199 PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH EXISTING ~ " CHURCH BUILDING A'l'rlO INTO STEEPLE AS NOTED EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE ::b65'-0 AGL T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (WP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETNL 2/SP-5. HATCHED AREA INDICATES POR~'ION OF STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH i'--'' PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING W [ L L ] A M [~, C 0 L l, [ N H A .,,~4'-4" AGE STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. A E C B ! T E C T H L ~ ~-F '~RO--FESED T-MOBiLE ANTENNAS I PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH ~_.~_47'-4" AGL EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING A'rnc INTO STEEPLE ~2-1 '[~O]LOG¥ Dt~W'E ~ETAfJ~, OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS T VOICE: ~u~1--~9-~50 FAX: !. PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EACT PROPOSED DARK SKY COMPLIANT UGHT ATOP h t t p: / / W W W · w f ¢ a i SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY PROPOSED CONCR~IL PAD E~RIOR BUILDING W~ TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF~EXlSTING __/) '~ (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ~,H~RY CABINET ATOP =-- ~ % (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET ATOP __= ~ k PROPOSED CO.ORETE P^O -- . -- -- I L _ ~ (1) PROPOSED GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO / - - .... ~- .... ~ PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. \ \ I ~ ~ ~ ~ / PROPOSED ELECTRIC METER / DISCONNECT SWITCH ~L~B ~1' (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABIN~ X \X \ / PANELMOU~EOTOP.OPOSEDUNISTRUTRACN · ___ ~ ~ :- ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE P~ -- \ X ~ ~ \ / ~ P.OPOSEO VER~ZO. ~SECTOR BOX MOU.TED TO ~ ~ - ~ -- . ,-- -- . . P,oPosEo u..STRUT ~cN - - X I (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT X X \ \ ~ / / i CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE ~ ~ \ \ ~ / / ~0.])AYE]~[01N' ...... 2 I1/10/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS --~ = -- . \ x, 4 12/16/08 AS PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 9 11/19/09 SSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW III1,~ , II Il II II II Ir ~~ : z \ z \ I~~* ~ ~----~ltl~l.i~lltJlilF~l~l\ /( / ~ T.O. PROPOSED '*~ 11 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW } ~ ~J-ULLUL J]J~ IIIf~:x/~-' iL ,~T-MOBLE EQUIPMENT 12 31/06/09 ISSUED FGR FILING ...................................... ~ ~ \ (12) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FOR FILING ~ ~ \ PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA, SEE DETAIL 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/1S/09 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING ~ '~ PROPOSED 6'-O~ HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE 12/16/~8 FOR REVIEW ~ MOUNTED ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PAD 12/16/08 FOR FILING FRONT OF PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PAD. 10/15/0~ FOR REVIEW SCALE: 1/1 6" =1'-0" (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE PPO CABINET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED CONCRb~L PAD~ EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE ~ (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN ~/Iil ii ' / ..,-s4'-,.' ADL.~ ~ J~J~ ~ ~. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ~ \ (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER ~IN~ ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD ~, ~ - AGL ~ ~ ~,~ ~. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ~ co.c~,~ .~. s~ m~ ~/s.-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ .~ ~o~,~ .o .cco.o~ATE ~.o~os~ ANTE.~ )~ IN~TION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MA~R~ PROPOS~ 6'-0' HIGH WHI~ VINYL ~NCE WITH (2) 21'-6" SLIDING ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TO BE REP~CED WEH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE ~s ,. ~.oNT o~ ..o.o~ co.c.~ .~. ~ X ~ X ~__~ ~- (1) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~ERY ~BIN~ ATOP PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ oo.c.~.~ .~ <.~o..). ~ .~AI. ~/~.-~ ~ ~ X X X ~o~os[~ ~ s~ co~c~ uom a~o~ X ~ X[ ~ (1) PROPOSED PPC C~IN~ ATOP PROPOSED ~ X ~ ~ ~ CONCR~E P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED E~CTRIC M~ER / DI~ONNECT SWITCH X X X X ~ ~ ~ ~ I PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VI~L FENCE TO k ~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ..o.os~ wino. ~.s~cTo. ~ox X X X X X X ~ ~ ~ ~ (12) PROPOSED ~eo~ff~ ~ACENT TO ~ ~ % %~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- I PROPOSED mum~[NT AR~. SEE DB~L ~/SP-37 ~ kX X ~ X ~ ~ ~~ · T...Mobile- DONDEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL ~c)r~'-~-~S~ EEC RESPECTS. S500 SUNRISE HWY, PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING AR'lC INTO STEEPLE THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE .... I .... ~l~ 5! '~ 27245 MAIN ROAD .... ! ......... CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ~ L1-13-807-C NORTHEAST & ; ~6'-1o' APL ~ SOUTHWEST ELEVA]]ON8 T.O. PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT · - · · ' .... 10/08/08 07-7199 O'--O'~ ~.,.,.,,- '"*' · GRADE '* ~,, DRAWING' NO.: t . AS NOTED ~"I ~,,, I,, CT Si 5 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION, ' ' '1' .... '"~ NM -- SCALE: 1/1~"=1'-0" ~ ,, ~ _ ~ ~!I, / W:: :?~ ' ._,¢,, 6CE6 Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 [THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE] 27245 MAIN RD.. CUTCHOGUE. NY I 1935 W~r¥1 e NORTH PAUL LaPASOTA DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 BLOCK: 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE: N 41' 00' 51" ZONING: R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY) LONGITUDE: W 72' 29' 15" NAD; BB AMSL: 20' LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAWLAND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 400 SQ.Fq'.± EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S18020 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINETS, (1) (1) UMTS CABINET AND (1) PPC CABINET (B) ANDREW: TMBXX-6516-R2M PROPERTY CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: TOM WlCKHAM (651) 765-5454 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAB, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 (6B1) 548-7042 LIPA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: 3500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER. N.Y. l 1739 PAUL LAPASOTA (651) 224-6651 MARIANA NEITO (651) 224-6600 BAZFERY CABINET, TITLE SHEET 10/15/08 02/22/10 VICINITY PLAN 10/15/08 02/22/10 BITE PLAN 10/15/08 02/22/10 EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BAKERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS AND PLANTING DETAIL 10/15/08 '40RTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONS NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 02/22/10 10/15/08 02/22/10 MARIANANEITO NORTH HOWARD LEGER HOWARD LEGER WILLIAM F. COLLIN& AIA ARC H I T E C T ~ LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE ~ETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE : 631-689-84:~0 FAX: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com 10/13/08 RBV~ON PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS FO[~ SHPO REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01/06/10 LSSUED FOR FLUNG 02/12/10 02/19/10 02/22/10 ~UKO TO FOR REVIEW 10/15/08 02/22/10 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ])AT]3 11/03/0:) FOR FILING 11/18/09 FOR REVIEW FOR REVIEW FOR FILING 0,4/29/05 FOR FILING 10/15/0~ FOR REVIEW · T-- -Mobile- Northeast LLC S500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-20S GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 ......... PR(kIEC~ NO.: 10/08/08 DRAWING NO,: AS NOTED 1"-1 1 OF 6 ' '\ T~IT~E~EET OF CUTQbt©GUE ~r'~ ~, r~I t',,COrCHOGUE; NY 11~35 ,,,, II/ , U~,13-807-C 07-7199 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH VICINITY PLAN SCALE: 1 "=70'-0" 2-STORY RESIDENCE RESIDENCE / / / 2-STORY RESIDENCE 1-STORY RESIDENCE ×/ -STORY RESIDENCEN EXISTING WOODLAND 1-STORY RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE / ..~I-STORY RESIDENCE / / / D~ \ / \ / x. N N / 2-STORY RESI \ \ STORY R % 1 -STORY ~ '" ~ESIDENCE 'x \\ / / 1 -STORY I RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE 1-STORY RESIDENCE 1 -STORY \ 2-STORY RESIDENCE % 1-STORY '" -STORY / 1-STORY RESIDENCE % / 2-STORY RESIDENCE 2-STORY \ RESIDENCE \ \ \ \ 2-STORY RESIDENCE 1 -STORY RESIDENCE 1 -STORY RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE / / L~STORY \ / RESIDENCE -STORY RESIDENCE \ 1-STORY CHURCH RESIDENCE .~ -STORY RESIDENCE \ STORY \ RESIDENCE \ -STORY RESIDENCE NOTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARREl h BONACCl AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, pLANNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUOE NY 11788 PHONE: {651) 455-1111 dOB NO. A070628 DATED AUGUST 50, 2007 INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A TAX MAP PREPARED BY COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, REAL PROFER1Y TAX SERVICE AGENCY, COUNTY CENTER, RIVERHEAD, NY 11901. DATED JUNE 5TH, 2007 0 35' 1 "=70' 70' 140' NORTH WILLIAM F. COLLINS~ AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 ~OLOOY DRIVE VOICE: 631-689-84S0 F.~D~: 6.31-689-84~ http://www.wfcaia.com 12/16/08 PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS 11/19/09 ISSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW 12/30/09 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 01/06/10 FILING 02/12/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS DATB IL~ 1'0 D~kT~ ~S~E.i~J) I'0 11/03/09 FILING 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW ,11/18/09 REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING FOR REVIEW FOR REVIEW ARF~ OF WORK-- · T-..Mobile. Northeast LLC 5500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 272.,4. ~,MAIN, ROAD VICINITY PLAN 10/08/08 AS NOTED DRAWN BY: OT NM NO.: 2 OF 6 DRAW~qG NO.: SP-1 PROPERTY LINE ' ~¢ EXISTING ) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT AREA, SEE 1/SP-5 FOR MORE INFORMATION ~ TO PROPOSED ~ENN~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ htt p://www.wf~aia.com PRO, DE ONE SIGN ON THE BOO,AY TO THE FREQUENCY EMISSION, ~>~ ~ :~ISTING X X ~ '~ ~ ~ ;~. ~¢~ ~ EX'STING CHURCH BUILDING ~ ~ 9 11/19/09 ISSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW . '~k~ 11 01/06/10 ISSUED FOE REVIEW ~' 12 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 2~ HOURS A DAY, 7 DA~ A WEEK Uxr~ //¢ REMOVE AR~ OF EXlSTIN60HURCH ~EEP~ FOR ~ % % ~ENNA INhALaTION ~ REQUIRED. REMOVAL 13 02/12/10 ISSUED FOE REVIEW ~R~ TO BE REP~CED WITH PROPOSED RF 14 02/19/10 ISSUED FOE REVIEW T-MOBI~ SI~ ID ~ U-13807C COMPATIBLE CONC~MENT TO ~TCH EXI~NG 15 32/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ~EPLE IN ALL RESPECt. SEE E~ATIONS SP-4 PRO, DE ONE SIGN ON ~E DOORWAY TO ~E ~ *~ '/ · SP-5 FOR ADDmO~ INFOR~ON. %% 11/10/08 FO~ REVIEW 11/18/09 FOB ~EVIEW h OR 'B' %~ (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ~TENN~ MOUSED W~HIN ~I~ING CHURCH ~EEPLE. (~P. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE D~AIL 2/SP-~. NOTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURV~ PREPARED BY: BARRY, BONACCl ~2~ 00' / / AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURV~ORS, N / P~NNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE ,AUPPAUGE '': · Mobile A070628 DATED AUGUST 30, 2007~ / NOTE: Northeast LLC / BARE ROOT P~NTS WILL NOT BE PERMI~ED. ALL P~NTING TO BE 5500 SUNRISE HWY. PRUNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST ~ SUITE D-205 AMERICAN A) PROPOSED F~TURES ~BELED AS SUCH; ALL ELSE EXISTING OR FUTURE BY OTHERS. / ARBORVITAE ~ERGREEN TREES P~NTED CONCR~E CURB ~ DRAINAGE INL~ / STRUCTURE B) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILI~ WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILI~ IS UNMANNED AND WILL BE VISITED / ON 1/A-5, {GUARANTEE TREES FOR A THE PRESBYTEBAN CHURCH ~ - DROP CURB ~ DRAINAGE INL~ / STRUCTURE ADDITIONALAPPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE IT tS NOT ANTICIPATED TO GENERATE ~ PERIOD OF ONE Y~R) EDGE OF PAVEMENT o LIGHT POLE D) NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED BITE. ~ y / WIRE PROVIDE TURN BUCKLES (~) OR 272~5 MAIN ~AD - / ~ ~IST ADJUSTMENT. ; '., .... GUTGH~UE;'NY~935 ~x :~ WIRE FENCE ~ STRUCTURE DRAINAGE E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE. ~ ~-- STOCKADE FENCE ~ ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX ~ ,/~ ~ CEDAR BARK CHIPS (V.LF.) OR ~o ~ P~CK~ FENCE ~ TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX F) THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR R~AIL S~GNS, NOR SPECIAL LiGHTiNG FOR THE PROPOSED SETH. ~ / ~ ~ / EQUIVALENT ,~r.-- . AT THE RATE OF , ~ ~TE PLAN ~ TREE U~E ~ :~E UY~RANT ~) THE CO.STRUCTIO~ OF T~IS FACln~ S,~,, A~SO BE ~. COU~UA.C~ w~m C~A~TER ~7 OF THE ~U~LD~ CODE I "c~'~° i) THE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA MOUNT STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE CONSIDERATION OF ~ 55.4~ SPOT EL~ATION ICING. FURTHER, THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 16, CHAPTER 17, CHAPTER . . ~ MONUMENT 18, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION 5108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. R STAKES BRIVEN AND ~;~ % ~AWN STRAIGHT. STAKES S~ AT ~ ~ 12~ INTERVALS AND EQUAL-DISTANT :11~11 ~ ~ II ~ FROM TREE AS NOTED (20) PROPOSED ARBORV~AE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETAIL 1/SP-2 EXISTING WOOD PICKET FENCE PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHffE VINYL FENCE TO SCREEN PROPOSED Muir / DISCONNECT & VERIZON TRANSECTOR CABINB PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT RACK PROPOSED ELECTRIC METER / DISCONNECT SWITCH PANEL MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNIETRUT RACK PROPOSED DARK SKY COMPLIANT LIGHT ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE PPC CABINET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD , (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE DETNL 3/SP-3 PROPOSED WHITE VINYL FENCE MOUNTED ATOP PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PAD WITH (2) 21'-6" SLIDING GATES MOUNTED IN FRONT OF PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PAD. (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD (1) PROPOSED CPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETNL 4/SP-3 (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE pAD. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-3 (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED GATE SUPPORT POSTE WITH PROPOSED HORIZONTAL TRACK TO GUIDE SLIDING GATES EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EQUIPMENT PLAN 3/: NORTHSTAR NSB170FT BA~FERY SPECIFICATION DRY CELL HIGH PURITY LEAD 99.99~ SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR MISSION-CRITICAL APPLICATIONS. EXCELS AT HIGH-RATE DISCHARGE AND RECHARGE, EXTREME TEMPERATURE RANGE, DEEP OR SHALLOW CYCLIC APPLICATIONS. HIGH CYCLIC LIFE CAPABILITY +500 C/3 @ 80% DOD. 10 YEAR FLOAT LIFE AT 25'C (77'0 -- 15 YEAR FLOAT LIFE AT 20'C (68'F). FLAME RETARDANT (UL 94 VO) PC-ADS ~LASTIC CASE AND COVER. ,3 STEP TERMINAL SEAL DESIGN TO ENSURE LEAK-FREE OPERATION. FEMALE M8 BRASS TERMINALS PROVIDE MAXIMUM HIGH RATE PERFORMANCE AND NO ANNUAL RETIGHTENING. INTEGRAL HANDLES ENSURE EASE OF HANDLING. APPROVED AS NON-HAZARDOUS CARGO FOR GROUND, SEA AND AIR TRANSPORTATION, MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICR SI UNITS ENGLISH UNITS REFER TO THE NSB DETAILED PERFORMANCE TABLES FOR ADDITIONAL CURRENT, CAPACITY AND POWER INFORMATION. HEIGHT 320.0 MM 12.60 INCHES WJDTH 125.0 MM 4.92 iNCHES LENGTH 560.0 MM 22.05 INCHES WEIGHT 59.1 KILOGRAMS 1.31.2 POUNDS TERMINAL TORQUE 8.0 NEWTON-METERS 71 INCH-POUNDS ELECTRICAL ALL NORTHSTAR CHARACTERISTIC__S 8 HOUR CAPACITY TO 1.75 VPC 168.1 AMP-HOURS 170.8 AMP-HOURS 10 HOUR CAPACITY TO 1.80 VPC 170 AMP-HOURS 172.4 AMP-HOURS FLOAT VOLTAGE 2.29 +/- .02 VOLTS PER CELL 2.27 .02 VOLTS PER CELL CYCLIC RECHARGE 2.45 VPC -- NO CURRENT LIMIT SHELF LIFE 2 YEARS SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT 5,000 AMPS VOLTAGE 12 VOLTS rMPEDANCE (1KHZ) 1.5 MW NORTHSTAR BAlq'ERY COMPANY IS PROUD TO BE REGISTERED TO IS0-9001:2000 AND ISO- 14-001 STANDARDS. FORM: SES-542-06 ISSUED: 05/05/04 ECO: / k PLAN · EOUIPMENT CAB. REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE. SEE POURED CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD DETAIL. SECURE NEW T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET TO NEW CONCRETE PAD WITH 3/4" S/S RODS SET IN HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS. TYP. BATFERY CABINET DETAILR M,N,MUM `3-1/2"EMBEDMENTI (Typ.) SCALE: 5/4"= 1 '-0" NORTH ~NTENNA -MFG: ANDREW - DECIBFI :PART NO.: TMBXX-6516-R2M -i45" DUAL BAND QUAD ANTENNA ~FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH ANDREW TELETILT~ REMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA SYST[M -WEIGHT: 54-.6 LBS. -MAX. WIND AREA: 2.9 SO.FT. -MAX. WIND LOAD (@1OOMPH): 164 LBF -MAX. WIND SPEED: I50 MPH -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED -CONNECTOR TYPE: 7-16 BIN, FEMALE (4) -COLOR: OFF WHITE -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 ~'OP VIEW ANTENNA DETAILS REAR VIEW FRONT VIEW NORTEL S18020 EQUIPMENT CABINET SUPPLIED BY CARRIER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 4'-5 7¢ PLAN · EQUIPMENT CAB NOT_E; (2) BAFrERY PLINTHS TO BE NORTEL S18000BP SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTUBER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S180008P: 19" HiGH x 5Y WIDE x 4,¢ DEEP BATFERY CAPACITY: 170 Ah TO 540 Ah HVAC CAPACITY: 190 WATTS-COOLING & 25O W HEATING WEIGHT: 1.322 LBS (27.3 LBS WITHOUT BATFERIES) 4:-3 72" 'x PLAN" BATTERY PLINTH NOTE: EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO BE NORTEL S18020 SUPPLJED BY AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. S_PECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S18020: 59-.3/6¢ TALL x 5.3-1/64" WlDE-~<' 28-15/16" DEEP CELL CAPACITY: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT WEIGHT: 1114,28 LBS ELECTRIC REQUIRED: 208-240 VAC ±10%, FREQUENCY 45-65 Hz GPS UNIT BY NAIS MODEL VIC- 100 ATTACHED TO ETS CABINET. COORDINATE ,CT LOCATION WITH ¢iOBILE RF ENGINEER S L ADAPTER \CKET AND GASKET. ~XlAL GPS 'ENNA CABLE FALL MOUNTING :HORS PROVIDED BY FALLER INTO JNTING HOLES _LED, USING BASE A TEMPLATE LE COVER ~ EXACT ~CO/ ANTE ANCHO INSTA MOUh AS NEW REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE, SEE POURED CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD DETAIL. SECURE NEW T-MOBILE S180008P BAFERY PLINTH TO NEW CONCRETE PAD WITH 1/2" DROP IN WEDGE ANCHOR (TYP.) TYPICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS SCALE: 5/¢= 1 '-0" WILLIAM E COLLINS, AIA AR C H I T E C T $, LLP 12-1 TECHNOlOGy DRIVE ~'TAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE : 631-689-8450 FAX: http://www.wfcaia.com CONSULTAN'p. REVJLqON ~,S PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS ISSUED FOR ~PO REVJEW ISSUED FOR EVEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FON FILING 02/12/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVEW 02/22/10 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FO9 REVIEW 11/10/E FOR FrLING 12/18/08 FO9 ZVEW 12/16/08 FOR LNG FOR FILING FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS FOR FILING FOR REVIEW T...Mobile Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 ---:'FHE PRESBY:.T N CHURCH ;ili',,,,,, ,,, ,, OF ' UTCHOGUE "" ' '~Z7245 MAIN I~AD , ~ CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 i ' "~..-,~J LH3-807-C 9U!.P- M__~6~P E~I~,' '~N~T-E N N A DETAILS, '~'~'- TYPICAL BATTERY, EQUPMENT C~T DETAES ~ PLA~ DETAE DATE: PI~t40.: 10/08/08 07-7199 8C~,LB Dt~WI~GNO.: AS NOTED 4 OF 6 SP-3 (B) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETAIL 2/SP-3. HATCHED AR~ INDICATES PO~ON OF ~-1 ~0~ ~EEP~ TO BE MODIRED TO VO[~ ~~~-- ~ ~.~. ~ ~x~5'-o~L ~ ~TE~*~"~T~o"*CCOMODA~ETo ~P~°P°sEDsE ~EOU~EO.~E~CE~*"~N~OWw~H ~ ~.~. CONC~E~ TO ~TCH ~I~ING ~ t ~I~NG CHURCH ~EPLE. (~. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE ~ H ~ ~ PROPOSED ~ OF WORK D~NL 2/SP-3. ~ ~ II it / / HATCHED AR~ INDI~TES POR~ON OF ~EPLE TO BE MODIRED TO ACCOMODA~ PROPOSED ~N~ INACTION ~l~J~[l~ / ~N~T~ ~ REQUIRED. REMOV~ MATER~ TO BE REP~I~ ~i ii~[ / ~5~'-~' AGL~ PROPOSED RF COMPA~B~ CONC~E~ TO MATCH ~ING ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ~ / ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ANTEN~ ~ ~EP~ IN A~ RESPE~. ~ ~ PROPOSED ~ OF WORK PROPOSED ~NNA C~LES ROUND UP ~ROUGH ~ ~ NO. ~ ~ON ATTORNEY COMMENTS I ~ *~5'--~" AGL ~ I II II ~ 9 ~1/~9/09 18SUED FOR 8HPO REVIEW FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION ~ ~ I OF PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~TEN~ ~ I~ II ~45'-]" A~L ~ 1~ 12/30/09 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~[N~ ~ fl 0~/06/1~ ISSUED FOR REVEW EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE ~ ~2 ~/06/10 18SUED FOR TILING ~3 ~2/~2/~0 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ~4 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW F CHURCH BUI~ING. PROPOSED . ~ , ~ C~ T~Y TO BE PNN~D TO ~TCH ~ I ~ ~ _ ~56'-&" AGL ~ ~:1= 10/13/08 FO~ REVIEW 11/03/0~ FO~ FILING ~P~CE OF ~I~NG ~ERIOR BUI~ING ~ ~ ~ ~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS . ~ ~56'-4" AGL ~ 11/~0/0~ FOR ~EViEW 11/1~/09 FOR REVIEW ~ ~ ~~ ~ W~ FUTURE CARRIER ANTENN~ ~ J ~ ~ EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ~ ' ~' ~.~., . 6h~ ~ . ~ . 3~'~ g~..~ ~2/~6/08 FOR FILING m PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ~. SEE ~ ~r ~ ~ ~q~{ ~ ~ °}~ PROPOSED ~RIZON / / ~ ' )~~ T~SECTOR BOX / / ~-~ ~ ~~-j)~~i¥)~ MOUN~D TO / / ~ 'I~ ~ o,~a ~ h.,' T.O. PROPOSED ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~-~1~~ 4-~~ ~ ~ T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT - , x · M bil 1 Skk °'-0" SUITE D-205 u I ~ [ X X N SCREEN PROPOSED M~ER / DISCONNECT ~ ~ ~ k k ' (2) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ EQUIPMEm C~IN~ ATOP ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED CONCR.E P~. SEE D~AIL 4/SP-3 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH t ~ ~ (1) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ PPC ~BIN~ MOUN~D ATOP ~--, , ",', -CU~G~GUE, NY 11~ ~ ~ PROPOSED CONCR~[ P~ ~', ~k'''~ "' "' L1-13-~7-C :::: o. x .-,-,, :,,, PROPOSED CONCR~E P~ OSED T-MOBI~ EQUIPMENT ~ B~ PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH WH~ VINYL ~NCE W"H (2) 21'-6' ~ ' PROPOSED T-MOa~ ~B~ T~Y MOUSED TO SUDING ~ IN ~ONT OF PROPOSED CONCR~E P~. ~ BU~NG. PROPOSED ~LE T~Y TO BE PN~ED TO ~TCH APP~NCE~ ~- ~U~HEA~ ELEVATIONS OF ~I~ING ~RIOR BUI~ING WA~ ~0/08/08 07-7~99 PROPOSED ~TEN~ C~S ROUTED UP ~ROUGH EXI~NG ~ ~G NO.: CHURCH BUILDING A~IC INTO ~EEP~ AS NOTED CT NORTHWEST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION NM SCALE: 5/q 6"=~'-0" SCAL~: 5/q 5"=q'-O" ~ ~o.: PROPOSED DARK SKY COMPLIANT LIGHT ATOP EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD ±65'-0 AGL (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BASTERY CABINET ATOP (~ T.O. OF EXISTING 51bbPLE (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD. SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 K~~~ EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (3YP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE \ PROPOSED AREAS OF WOR DETNL 2/SP-3. (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET ATOP \ PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD -- HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH (1) PROPOSED GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXIST1NG PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. ~54'-4' AGL ----- \ ~!'~ ~ STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. SEE DETNL 4/SP-3 ~ _~ ~ ~ WILLIAM F. COLLIN[ AIA -I- U~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS~~ A R C H I ~ ~ C ~ S, L [ P PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS EX'"'"OOHURCHBU..NOA. O,NTO~EEPLE ATOPPROPOSEDOO.ORETEPAD-- \ \ ~ \ ~.~_45'-3' AGL ,~ ~ ~ (2)PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMEHT \ \ PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO FAST CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED Cn~rmcT¢ o~n t t t \ VOICE : 631-689-8450 FAX : 63t-689-8459 ~/ ~- OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS [~ J ~ SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY SEE n~-r~. ~/em ~ ........... \ t~ j./ TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EX,STINO ....... '~-~ -- ~ . -- ' -- EXTERIOR BUILDING WN-L -- --, \ \ ~±36 -~" AGL ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~/'~~~\~_.~ \ , ROPOSED ELEC.lC METER ~ D,SCO.NECT SW,TCH ~ .... ~ J _ !~'~;~c~' ~ ~~~~_ ~ ~ / / PANEL MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT RACK ~ ~ ~ ~ :- : ~ ~ ?: ~~ ;~.~ _T~ ., ~ ~' \ / / ~ PROPOSED VER,ZON ~NSECTOR BOX MOUHTED TO --- ~ ~, ~~,~~~~ ~ ~ ~ / / PROPOSEDU..~RUTRACN - - ...... ' ' ' ~ __ 4 12/16/08 a,S PER ATTORNEY COMMENTS ..... -- / ~ ~ 9 11/19/09 ISSUED FOR SHPO REVIEW 10 12/30/09 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ~ __ r~ ~ ~ ~=~ = = , ~s-10-AOL 11 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 12 01/0~/10 ISSUED FOR FILING · ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ u~ ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~ll~,]~l~rl~llBl-+~lll~l~k~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T-MOB,LEEQU,PMEHT 1s O~/I~/IO,SRUEDEORREV,EW ~ 'U ~ ~ ..... 0'0' I% ~ ~ G R~[~ E I~ ]~P~15 32/22/10]~U~z)ISSUED~o FOR ~[~FILING PER[~i_]~_~)TOWN COMMENTS~o ................................ ~' - ~ X ~ (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO 10/13/06 FOR REVIEW 11/03/0~ FOR EILIN~ ~ ~ 2P~sOpPO~ED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETAIL 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/i8/09 FOR REVIEW PROPOSED 6'-O· HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE ~ ~ - 11/10/08 FOR FILING MOUNTED AT,DP .PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PAD ~ ~ ~1~ PROPOSED T MOm~¢ =ar, r,^a,~c-~ 12/I~/0[ FOR REVIEW WITH (2) 2~ -B SUD~N¢ CATES MOUNTED ~N_.~___/// ' ' - " ............ NORTHEAST ELEVATION ,ONT DP PROPOSED EQU,PMENT PAD. MOUNTED ON PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD 1~,1~,0~ EON E,U,N~ 04/29/0~, FOR FILING SCALE: 1~1 6" = 1 '-0"1O/lS/0~ FOR REVIEW (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. OYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETAIL 2/SP-3. EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS ATOP PROPOSED CONCRLiE PAD NORTH +45'--3# AGL ~ O0.CRETEPAB. SEEDSTAIL.~Sp-~ ~ \ ~ \ I~.~ ' ~OPPROPOSEDT-MOB, LE~EN.AS PROPOSED .'-O' ... W.,TE V,~...O~W.. ~ =~'-.' .U... ' ' ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~obile ~TE... ~o.~ o...o.o. ED co.c..~ .~. ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' · · (1) PROPOSED T-MO8~ ~H~ ~N~ ATOP PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~u ~ Northeast LEE co.c~....~ (.~o..). s....AI~ ~/~.-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ ~.._~.. ~ ~0 ~u,,,~, ,w~. ANTENNA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS FUTURE CARRIER SUITE D-203 PROPOSED DARK S~ COMP~ UG~ ATOP ~ / ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ , ~_ GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 PROPOSED CONCR~E P~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ LOCATION ~ HATCHED AR~ INDI~ POTION OF STEEPLE TO (,~ ..o.o. ED ..c ~....~o...o.osED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~;~%~ ~~ { ~ ~~ ...o. FIED ~o .cco.ocA~ ..o.o~ED ANTE.~ INVASION ~ REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATER~ co.c~.~ .~ X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ -'~ '~ ~ r TO SE .E.~CED W~...OPOSED .F CO..*TIBLE ..o.osED .u~... ~ . X ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~- ~~?~~- ~ .~ ~ ~ , co.c.~ ~o ~.c. ~,~.~ P.OPOSED E~.,C a..~ / ~.SOO~ECT ~C. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~.~ 7~, ~-~_ ~ ' .~PEOm. THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH , ~ ~ ~ --.~o.os. ~EN. ~LE..CTED ~. TH.o~. OF CUTCHO~UE SCREEN PROPOSED M~ER/DISCONNE~ P~EL X X X X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ m m · ~RmZON~SE~OR~aN~, ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~F~~ ~ m PROPOSED WR,ZON ~NSE~OR aOX X X X X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢~~~ ~ , .......... .,.,. ......... - ....... "COT~HO~E, NY 11935 - I ~6'-10' AGL -- mT.O. PROPOSED ~ [ ~T~E8 E~VATIO~ ~ SOUTHWEST ELEVATION ~: S:) 5 SCALE: ~/~ 6"=~ '-0' NM . Sou~ Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 /THE PRESBYTER/AN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE] 27245 MAIN RD.. CUTCHOGUE. NY I I Laurel ' Waterville Scut NORTH DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 BLOCK: 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE: N 41' 00' 31" ZONING: R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSI~') LONGITUDE: W 72' 29' 13" NAD: 83 NORTH PAUL LaPA$OTA MARIANA NEITO HOWARD LEGER HOWARD LEGER LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAWLAND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 148 SQ.FT.:E EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S18020 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINETS, (1) BA~I'ERY CABINET, (1) UMTS CABINET AND (1) PPC OABINET (8) ANDREW: TMB×X-6516-R2M PROPERTY CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: TOM WICKHAM (631) 765-5454 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 (631) 548-7042 LIPA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROdECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: 3500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE E~203, GREAT RIVER, N.Y. 11739 PAUL LAPASOTA (631) 224-6651 MARIANA NEITO (631) 224-6600 TITLE SHEET VICINITY PLAN 10/13/08 1 o/13/o 8 05/05/10 05/05/10 o5/o5/1o 05/05/10 SITE PLAN 10/13/08 EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATTERY, EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS AND PLANTING DETAIL 10/13/08 NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONS NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 10/13/08 05/05/10 10/13/08 05/05/10 ARCHI C T $, Ap 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 ¥OIC]/ : /~1-/~-~0 FAX: 6~1"~9-~ http://www.wfeaia.com RE~ON ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVEW ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR REVIEW 18SUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FLUNG PER TOWN COMMENT3 18SUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FILING 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/18/09 REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING FOR REVIEW FOR FILING FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW · T...Mobile. Northeast LLC 3500 3UNRISE HWY. SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN I~DAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11~35 L1-13-807-C TITLE SHEET l::ekTB~ ~ NO.: 10/08/08 8¢~E1BB DRAWING NO.: AS NOTEC ~M NM ~l' NO.: 1 OF6 07-7199 T-1 "~ ~-STORY A R C H I T E C T S, LLP / / ' 1-STORY RESIDENCE ' EXISTING WOODLAND VOIC'~: 63]--~8450 F.,,'~I(: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfeaia,com ~ ~°~ ~0. ~ ~0~ 2-~ORY E~IDENC[ X 18 35/05/~D ISSUED FO~ REVIEW ~ / /~ ~SIDENCE ~ X / ~2/16/0~ FOR REVIEW xx Northeast LLC RESIDENCE X / ~ ~ ~ ~ ' / / RESIDENCE / 272~ ~ ~AD ~ ~ ~~ ~ LF~-~7-C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VIONTY PLAN SCALE: 1"=70'-0" DATED JUNE 5TH, 2007 NORTH ~*'~0., 20F~ PROPER]~( LINE ~ '% ,'~ o¢,' , ~ PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPME~ AR~, S'E NO. L'-13807C *~ + '~ // X X~ N ~0 / U~ ' / / ,~ ~ "~ ~ PROPOSED CABLE ~Y TO ROmE '~ ~ /': ~ ~ ' % ~0' ff ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ A~NN~ UP INTO ~I~ING AWlC AND ~%~ http://www.wfcai=.com ~.~ .octavo ~ ~co.~ ~ o~ ' 'x .4 ' ~ ~ ~;% , c.u.c. % ,, LIMITED ACCESS ~ ~/ ~ "~ ~ . ~ k~ / ~ ~ ~ IS PRESENT WffHIN ~EP~ ~ ~+ ~ EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING % NO. DA~ ~ON IN C~E OF EMERGENCY ~ T-MOBILE /' /~ //~ 10 12/30/09 ISSUED FOR REVIEW OPE~TIONS CE~R AT {%~ ~ 11 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW / 1-888-218-666~ 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK x REMOVE ~ OF [XI~ CHURCH ~EPLE FOR 14 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW k ~ATERIA~ TO BE REP~CED WITH PROPOSED RF 16 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW T-~OBIE Sl~ ID ~ L1-1~807C x CO~PA~E CO~C~LM[~ TO MATCH ~1~ 17 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PRO. DE ONE SIGN ON ~E DOORWAY TO ~E ~ .' ~ ~ · SP-5 FOR ADDmO~L I~FORMA~ON. OHUR~H SIGNAGE REQUIREMENT / · .mobile , BARi' ROOT P~NTS WILL NOT BE Northeast LLC FAClLI NOTES LEGEND_-- ,' / ~ ~'-o" c.c. ,o ,~ ~,u~, As s,ow, CONCR~E CURB~DRAINAGE '~"~ / S*"UC*U"~ ") ~'~ ~"O~OS~ "U"UC U~U~ W~"~"~SS CO~U"CA*'O~S ~AC'U~ ~S U"~A~"~ A"~ W'"" ~ WS'*~ / O~ ~/A-~. (~UA"~"~ *"~CS ~0" A THE PEESBYTEBAN CHURCH ADDITIONAL NOISE, FUMES, VIBRATIONS, DUST, ODORS OR TRAFFIC./ OF CUTCHOGUE WALL ~ SIGN C) NO ADDITIONAL PAR~ING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. / ~ / ~ 1/2"e RUBBER HOSE AND 12 GA. GALV. EDGE OF PAVEMENT o LIGHT POLE D) NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. ~ ~ / WiRE PROVIDE TURN BUCKLES (3) OR 27245 MA~ ~AD ~,, x-- WIRE FENCE ~ STRUCTURE - DRAINAGE ~ k / ~IST ADdUSTMENT. ~ u-- STOCKADE FENCE ~ ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE. ~/ ~/~ ~ CEDAR BARK CHIPS (V.I.F.) OR ~TCHO~UE, ~ ~935 --o ~ PICK~ FENCE ~ TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX F) THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCrAL OR R~AIL SIGNS, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE PROPOSED SITE. ~ / ~ / EQUIVALENT U-~3-807-0 Iq:~:~:~:::q CONCR~ .WATER VALVE G) FIRE PROTECTION AND SECURI~ PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORING OF THE SUBJECT SITE. // t ~ / / ~ SRE~ LINE ~ FIRE HYDRANT H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FA~ILI~ SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANC~ WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE // ' ~ / / (5) POUNDS PER YARD. WATER ~ PLAN ~ ~ ~(3) CEDAR STAKES DRIVEN AND 10/08/08 07-7199 ~~ ~ D~AWN STRAIGHT. STAKES S~ AT ~~% 120:-IN~RVALS AND EQUAL-DISTANT I $CA~: ~"=20'-0" ~O~T~ SCA~[: ~" ~' 0,, ~.~ ' , ~'.~.. -- PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO ..,. 8" ~ 1'-0' , / PROPOSED U.,SrRUT .*CK 4, '-. ANTENNA ~ ¢'f '&;~ \% / ,~ (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO -' ~ L,_j ~)~ -. ~ ANDREW - DECIBEL . ~. ~'L,_~,~)~,~ ",%~ ~ / PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETAIL -PART NO,: TMBXX-6516-R2M ¢ ~" ~ (~" ~ ~ ._FULLY COMPATrBLE WITH ANDREW TEL~ILT~ __ ~O ~ ~~~ MECHANICAL INFO , ~ -MAX. WIND AR~: 2.9 SQ.~. ~ -MAX. WIND LOAD (~10OMPH): 16~ LBF ~ WILLIAM gCOLLIN~AIA / -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH ~¢~%/ % ~ !% -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED -CONNECTOR ~PE: 7-16 DIN, FEMALE (4) ~5/5~ ~ ~ ~% -COLOR: OFF WHITE % -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TMGOO899A-2 (1) PROPO~~ ~ . - ~ ,~ TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW R~R VIEW FRONT VIE~ o) ANTENNA DETAILS PROPOSED ACOU~C~ ~ x ~ NORTEL S18020 EQUIPMENT CABIN~ SUPPLIED PROPOSE . . EQUIPME ~ 14 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ~ 15 02/22/~ ISLED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ~ ~ 16 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW (2) PRO ~OU~ ~ ~~ ~ 17 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR FILIN~ EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN ~ / ~, ~,~? ~] -. 11/10/08 FORREViEW 11/18/09 FORREVIEW EQUIPMENT PLAN SCALE:~/16"=1 '-O" NORTH g ~ ' 12/16/0812/1~/°8 FoRFOR FILINGREVIEW -- ~_ 04/29/0~ FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW ~ % PLAN ..v C~LL H~H ~U.~ L~D ~.~ S, UN~TS ~N~USH UN~TS ~ HOU~ CA~AaW TO ~.~ WC ~.~ A~-HOU.S 1~0.~ PLAN * EOUIPMENT CAB. L SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR MISSION-CRITICAL REFER TO THE NSB D~AILED AMP-HOURS (2) EQUIPMENT CABIN.S TO BE NORTEL S18020 SUPPLIED BY APPLICATIONS, EXCELS AT HIGH-RATE PERFORMANCE TABLES FOR 10 HOUR CAPACI~ TO 1.80 VPC 170 AMP-HOURS 172.4 NOTE~ T-MOBILE, AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ DISCHARGE AND RECHARGE, EXTREME TEMPERATURE ADDITIONAL CURRENT, CAPACI~ AMP-HOURS (2) BAKERY PLINTHS TO BE NORTEL S18000BP MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. ~NGE, DEEP OR SHALLOW AND POWER INFORMATION. FLOAT VOLTAGE 2.29 +/- .02 VOLTS PER CELL 2.27 +/- SUPPLIED BY T-MOBiLE AND INSTALLED BY CYCLIC APPLICATIONS. HEIGHT 520.0 MM 12.60 INCHES .02 VOLTS PER CELL CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S18020: FLOAT LIFE AT 20'C (68"F). WEIGHT 59.1 KILOGRAMS 13t2 SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT 5,000 AMPS WEIGHT: 1114.28 LBS INTEGRAL HANDLES ENSURE ~SE OF HANDLING. IS0-14001 STANDARDS. ~A~ACHED TO BTS APPROVED AS NON-HAZARDOUS CARGO FOR GROUND, FORM: SES-542-06 ISSUED: 05/05/04 ECO: 345-S04 ~ ~'~ ~, EXAcTCABIN~'LOCATIoNCOORDINATEwITH , ', ~ O~ ~ NOR~ S~ AND AIR TRANSPORTATION. / % T-MOBILE RF ENGINEER ,, / - ''. ANTENNA CABLE Northeast LLC / INSTALL MOUNTING ~500 SUNRISE H~. ~ k / ANCHORS PROVIDED BY ~ SUITE D-20~ ~j ~ /' INSTALLER INTO (4) ~ GREAT RIVER, NY 1~73B ~ / MOUNTING HOLES ..... THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ? == ¢ ...... OF CUTCHOGUE / ~ ,, EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, EQUIPMENT PAD D:AIL, -- / EQUIPMENT PAD D~AIL,~ ~/ AS NOTED NEW OONCR~E PAD WITH ~/¢" S/S RODS / NEW gONOR~E PAD WITH 1/2" DROP IN WEDGE ANOHOR/ CT 1/2" T LOCATION WITH ' )BILE RF ENGINEER L ADAPTER ;KET AND GASKET. ;IAL BPS NNA CABLE ~LL MOUNTING tORS PROVIDED BY ~LLER INTO 4TING HOLES .ED. USING BASE . TEMPLATE E COVER 1 (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXI~ING CHURCH ~EEP~. (~P. 2 PER SECtor)SEE D~NL 2/SP-3. ~TCHED ~ INDICA~S POTION OF VOI~ ~EP~ TO BE MODIFIED TO / i65'-0 AGL ACCOMMODA~ PROPOSED ~EN~ / IN~ON ~ REQUIRED. REMOVAL ~ / ~TERI~ TO BE REP~CED WI~ [ / T'O' OF EXISTING STEEPLE ~ PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE J / EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE CONC~E~ TO ~TCH ~I~ING ~ / (8) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~ENN~ MOUN~D wmmmN ~ II ~ x-- PROPOSED ~ OF WORK EXI~ING CHURCH ~EP~. (~. 2 PER SE~OR) SEE ~ II t~ ~TCHED ~ INOI~S POTION OF ~EEP~ TO BE ~ ~i]~ / ~T~ . m, .' MODIFIED TO ACCOMMO~ PROPOSED ~N~ IN~DN ~ii~it~[ / . ~ REQUIRED. REMOV~ ~R~ TO BE REP~CED WI~ ~T~ !~ / i54'-4" AGL~ i54'-4" AGE ~ i ! M~y _ ~ ~g.~O PROPOSED RF COMPA~B~ CONC~E~ TO ~TCH ~I~ING ] [ [{ ~ ~ ~ / · OF PROPOSED T-MO81~ ~N~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTEN~ ~ J PROPOSED ~NNA ~B~S RO~ UP ~ROUGH ~ ~ ~I~ING CHURCH BUI~ING A~IC I~O ~EEPLE r ] J ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE AN~N~ ~ 15 32/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS 16 35/05/10 ISSUED FO~ REVieW 17 35/85/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PROPOSED T-MOBILE ~LE ~Y MOUN~D TO ~ ==bm = ~ SIDE OF CHURCH BULDNO PROPOSED ~ ~ ;~ - ..~ ~ 10/13/0~ FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 FOR FILING ~P~NOE OF ~I~ING E~ERlOR BUI~ING ~ ~ ~ ~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS ~ i~6'-4" AGL ~ 11/10/0~ FO~ REVIEW 11/18/09 FOR aEVIEW W~ ~: FUTURE CARRIER ANTENN~ ~ : ~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS' LOCATION ~ 11/19/08 FO~ FILING EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS ~ ~:~/~ ~::~ : ~. (20) PROPOSED ~BO~I,~ A~ACENT X ~ ~ ~~f~ :&~ '~:: ~; TO PROPOS~ EQUIPMENT ~ SEE PROPOSED ~RIZON / / ~s~o. ~ox / / ~ ~ ~~~ ~/, T.O. PROPOSED ACOU~ICAL ~ ........ ~' -¥~ ] ~ ~ ~ T.O. PEOPOSED' ~OU~C~ ~ ~ O~ WO~ " ' -- - · · -mobile. : /~ }r Nor,heast LLC ~' ~ GRADE ~ ¢ '~ ~ / SUITE D-203 GR~T RIVER, NY 11739 ~ PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE TO I I I I sc. ER...OPOSEO .~E. / D~SCO..ECT ~ ~; ¢ ~ ~ VERIZON ~SE~OR ~IN~, THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ~AD ~T~O~, NY 11~35 U-13-807~ NORTHWEST ~T~AST ~EVAT~S CE ~ ~ NO,: 10/08/08 07-7199 PROPOSED ~TENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH EXI~ING CHURCH BUILDIN~ A~C INTO ~EEP~ AS NOTED CT SCALE: 5/16"=1'-0" SCALE: 5/16"=1'-0" ~ua: 5OF6 PROPOSED DARK SKY COMPLIANT LIGHT EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM · 65'-0 AGL I~ T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE PROPOSED AREAS OF WORN 1~4' AGL PROPOSED T-MOBILEANTENNAS 1.~..45'-3" AGL OF PROPOSED T-MOBILEANTENNAS ±56'-4" AGL I CARRIER ANTENNAS FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE, (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETAIL 2/SP-5. HATCHED AREA INDICATES PoI~rlON Of STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING An'lC INTO STEEPLE PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY TO BE PNNTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL NORTHEAST ELEVATION EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS WiTHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-5 PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM WITH FINISHES TO MATCH EXISTING CHURCH (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BAI'rERY CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (BEYOND). SEE DETNL 3/SP-3 PROPOSED DARK SKY COMPUANT LIGHT WiTHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (1) PROPOSED PPC CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM PROPOSED ELECTRIC METER / DISCONNECT SWITCH PANEL MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT RACK -- (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETNL PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE TO SCREEN PROPOSED METER / DISCONNECT & VERIZON TRANSECTOR CABINET II SOUTHWEST ELEVATION II (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BA'n'ERY CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM. SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (1) PROPOSED GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. SEE DETNL 4/SP-3 (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS WiTHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM (2) PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINETS WiTHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-3 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN PROPOSED ELECTRIC METER / DISCONNECT SWITCH PANEL MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT RACK PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT RACK · 10'-0" AG~ T.O. PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL"F SYSTEM · 6'-10" AGLa-, T.O. PROPOSED'i" T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM FINISHES TO MATCH EXISTING CHURCH Il II II N LI Ir PROPOSED ARBORViTAE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETAIL 2/SP-2 (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE PPC CABINET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD GRADE EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE · 65'-0 AGL T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLEI3/d PROPOSEDAREAS OF -- (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. ('PfP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETAIL 2/SP-3. :E54'-4" AGL ~. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS · 45'--3' AGL~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS''P' r FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION ~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS ~ HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED, REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS, PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTEB UP THROUGH EXISTINO CHURCH BUILDING ATrlC INTO S3EEPLE ,10'-0" T.O. PROPOSED ACOUSTICALXF SYSTEM T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT GRADE WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T S' LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE 8EI'AUI(ET, NY 11733 VOICE: (~1-6~9-~-.50 FA: &~-f89-M$9 http://www.wfcaia.com ERVISION FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING SSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS SSUED FOR FILING DAI'B ~,gLT~ TO 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW FOR FILING 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING 04/29/09 FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW ~ PLAN: FOR REVIEW -Mobile. Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-205 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MA~ ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 LH3-807-C NORTHEAST & SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS PRQIECr NO.; 10/08/08 07-7199 DRAW~IO NO.: AS NOTED DRAV~'i BY: CT NM 6 OF 6 SP-5 L Rd Northeast I_[_C 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 (THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE) 2724fi MAIN RD.. CUTCHOOUE, NY I I Laurel W~terville NORTH DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 BLOCK: 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE: N 41' 00' 51" ZONING: R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY) LONGITUDE. W 72' 29' 15" NAD' 85 AMSL: 20' LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAWLAND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 165 SQ.FT.+ EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S18020 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER (1) UMTS CABINET AND (1) PPC CABINET CABINETS, (1) BAKERY CABINET, PROPERTY CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: (8) ANBREW: TMBXX-6516-R2M & (1) GPS UNIT T-MOBILE NORTHEAS¥ LLC PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: TOM WlCKHAM (631) 765-5454 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 (651) 548-7042 LIPA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D-203, GREAT RIVER, N,Y, 11739 PAUL LAPASOTA (65~) 224-6651 MARIANA NEITO (651) 224-6600 TITLE SHEET VICINITY PLAN SITE PLAN AND PLANTING DETAILS EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATrERY AND EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONS NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS DETAILS 10/13/08 06/08/10 10/15/06 06/08/10 10/15/0B 06/08/10 10/15/08 06/08/10 10/15/08 06/08/10 10/15/08 06/08/10 06/07/10 06/08/10 MARIANA NEITO NORTH WAYNE SMITH WAYNE SMITH WILLIAM E COLLIN$, AIA ARC H I T E C T 8, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOOY DRIVE ~TA~, NY 1173] VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631'689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com CONSULTA]qT: R~/~ION SSUED FOR FILING SSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS SSUED FOR ~VIEW SSUED FOR RUNG SSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING DATE:, LR3LmJ) TO 10/13/(}8 FOR REVIEW -OR FILING 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW -OR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW · T.- -Mobile. Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-205 6REAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD CU~CHC~UE, Ny 11935 'L% ~ I: L1-13-807-C ~ ?.o~o YiTCl~/' ...... SHEET 10/08/08 AS NOTED NM NO.: 1 OF 7 07-7199 T-1 VICINI PLAN 2-STORY RESIDENCE / / RESIDENCE "" 1 -STORY RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE \ RESIDENC~/ 2-STORY RESIDENCE \ ,_sToRy 1-STORY RESIDENCE EXISTING WOODLAND / \ / 2-STORY / "'E~, ~ RESIDENCEo / 1-STORY RESIDENC , x 1-STORY '~ -STORY 2-STORY RESIDENCE ~DENCE RESIDENCE / / / -STORY RESIDENCE J /' / / STORY ~'0~ ~ C~CHOGUE ~B~Y / ~ X / RESIDENCE / 1-STORY RESIDENCE // ~\ XN.~-STORY RESIDENC~ X 1-~ORY ~ ~ESIDENCE X 2-STORY RESIDENCE \ 1 -STORY RESIDENCE \ \ 1 -STORY RESIDENCE ~ / \ % / \ 2-STORY \ RESIDENCE \ \ \ 2-STORY RESIDENCE ~ \ \ 1 -STORY \ RESIDENCE / 2-STORY RESIDENCE 1 -STORY RESIDENCE 2-STORY RESIDENCE -STORY RESIDENCE \ 1-STORY CHURCH \ RESIDENCE \ 1 -STORY RESIDENCE --STORY RESIDEN~' NOTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARREYF, BONACCI AND VANWEELE CiViL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 PHONE: (631) 435-1111 dOB NO. AOTO62B DATED AUGUST 50, 2007 INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A TAX MAP PREPARED BY COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY, COUNTY CENTER, RIVERHEAD, NY 1 1901, DATED JUNE 5TH, 2007 0 55' 1 "=70' 70' 140' NORTH WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12"1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, ~ 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com COHSULTAt~. REVISION FOR FILING SSUED FOR REVIEW FOR REVIEW $SUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS SSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING SSUED FOR REVIEW SSUED FOR FILING DAT~ ~TO I[~L%~U~:,U TO 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW :OR FILING 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW iFOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/15/08 FOR REVIEW 12/15/08 FOR FILING FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW AREA OF WORK- · T...Mobile- Northeast LLC 5500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ,,, , I, ',, L1-13-807-C /VICINITY PLAN 07-7199 SP-1 ~10 FREQUENCY RELDS ~Y ~CEED FCC o o' ~x ,, ~ .: N ~ % g ~ ~ / ,/3~/ / POPU~TION EXPOSURE IN PROXIM~ TO ~'~'~.~'~ ~NNA FACE. 9 ~ ~ /~ PROPOSED C~LE ~Y TO ROU~ ~EP~ LOCATED ~LCO~ L~EL OF ~COMMUNICA~ONS FAClUW, WHICH PRODUCES ~10 .~ ~ x~~ ~ %~ / / i %~-~'[~- 8~¢~q ~ EXISTING CHURCH BUILDINS IS 1-888-21~-6664 , REMOVE ~ OF EXI~NG CHURCH ~EEP~ FOR 15 35/05/10 ISSUED FO~ REVIEW ~ENNA IN~TION ~ REQUIRED. REMOVAL 17 35/~5/10 ISSUED FO~ FILING 2~ HOURS A DAY, 7 DA~ A WEEK ~ ~R~ TO BE REP~CED W~H PROPOSED RF ~ 3~/07/1~ SSUED FO~ REVIEW ~ COMPA~BLE CONC~LMENT TO ~TCH EXI~ING ~9 36/08/1~ ISSUED FO~ FILING T-MOBI~ SITE ID ~ U-15807C N ~EPLE IN A~ RESPECt. SEE E~ATIONS SP-~ ~ · · SP-5 FOR ADDmON~ INFOR~TION. ~/~ . 10/13108 FOR REVIEW 11/03/0~ FOR FILING ' 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/18/09 FOR REVIEW CHURCH ~ x~ 'B'~ 11/10/08 FOR FILING h')) 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW SECTOR) SEE D~NL 2/SP-3. ~ W~IN EXI~ING CHURCH ~EEPLE. (~P. 2 PER ~OTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HERBN IS BASED UPON / AND VANWEELE CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURV~ORS, ~_.~.' P~NNERS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE X ~ NOTE: Northeast LLC NY 11788 PHONE: (631) 455-1111 JOB NO.~ RARE ROOT P~NTS WILL NOT BE F CILI OTES ~ NEW 6' TALL (MINIMUM} AMERICAN LEGEND / ARBORVITAE ~ERGREEN TREES P~NTED A) PROPOSED F~TURES ~BELED AS SUCH; ALL ELSE EXISTING OR FUTURE BY OTHERS. ~ 5'~0" O.C, TO BE PLUMB AS SHOWN CONCR~E CURB ~ DRA, NAGE INL~ / STRUCTURE B) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTIL~ WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FAOILI~ IS UNMANNED AND WILL BE VISITED ON 1/A-3. (GUARANTEE TREES FOR A THE P~ESBYTEDAN CHU~OH STRUCTURE APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO GENE~TE ~ ~,0~ O~ ON~ ~) OF CUTCHO UE DRAINAGE INL~ / DROP CURB ADD~TIONAL NOISE, FUMES, VIBRATIONS, DUST, ODORS OR TRAFFIC, ~ / WALL ~ SIGN C) NO ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE./ ~ / ~ 1/2"~ RUBBER HOSE AND 12 GA. GALV. / WiRE PROWUE TUrN UCKLES 272 MAIN EDGE OF PAVEMENT o LIGHT POLE D) NO SOLID OR UQU~B WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED S~TE. ~ ~ ~IST ADdUSTMENT. CUT O UE, NY ~--~ x-- WIRE FENCE ~ STRUCTURE - DRAINAGE E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE. ~/~ ~ CEDAR BARK CH~PS {V.LF.) OR -~'5 LH3-807-C ~ ~-- STOCKADE FENCE ~ ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX ~ /~ ~ / EQUIVALENT --~ ~ PICK~ FENCE ~ TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX F) THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR R~AIL SIONS, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE PROPOSED S~TE. // ~ ~ / ~ BACKFILL WITH TOPSOIL MIXED WITH '~[~ ~:.:~:~:'.:~ CONCR~E ~ WATER VALVE G) FIRE PROTECTION AND SECURI~ PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORINC OF THE SUBJECT SITE. / / o/2o/a F~T~UZER AT THE RA~E OF '" PLAN ~ TREE LINE ~ F~RE HYDRANT H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILI~ SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE // ' ~ / / (5) POUNDS PER YARD. WATER OF NEW YORK STATE AND NFPA 70, FOR ELECTRICAL WORK AND GROUNDING. / ~ / ~ / / THOROUGHLY AND FILL TO EXISTING NE ON TREE TRUNK. o~ HEDGE ~ ~"~/ TOP / BOSOM OF CURB ec~so I) THE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA MOUNT STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE CONSIDERATION OF ~ TREE DESIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 16, CHAPTER 17, CHAPTER 55.45 SPOT EL~ATION ICING. FURTHER, THE STRUCTURAL ~ MONUMENT 18, CHAPTER 19 AND SECTION 5108 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. ~ ~ ~0.: R STAKES DRIVEN AND ~~; % DRAWN STRAIGHT. STAKES S~ AT I ~ ~ ~"¢N~RVALS AND EQUAL-DISTANT AS NOTED g'<'~-~ ~,- ~ PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO 1'-0' '~ ~ '%% (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ~ ~--~2~;~ ~ ~2'~ ~ ~ / (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL ~ ff. ,~ ~ ~'f ~ '~ ~ ~ SYSTEM. SEE BETAIL 3/SP-3 ~ ~'~'~ ~ ~ ~_~x'~.~ ~ ~ (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSllCAL SYSTEM ~ ~L~.~ ~ ~L~?~ '%~.~ ~ /~ (1) PROPOSE9 BPS UNIT MOUNTED TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. (,) PROPOSED T-MO.,,. PPC CA.,.ET MOU.TE ' o. PROPOSED CO.CRETE P~ / SEE Sv~RR~zEcNNPTRO~sOEScETDoRMETEc~R,&DISCONNE~ ~ / ~ %. ~ .-¢'%"% X/ /'%~ / / / / /' ~, ~,~\,~ ~EXISTINB TREES TO REMAIN "%.. % / %.% EQUIPMENT ACCESS (3) OOUBLE & (1) SINGLE ANTENNA -MFG: DEW - DECIBEL , / · -J-45" DUAL BAND QUAD ANTENNA _-FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH ANDREW TELETILT_~ REMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA SYSTEM MECHANICAL INFO -WEIGHT: 34,6 LBS. Io -MAX, WING AREA: 2.9 SQ.FT. ~i' .I -MAX. WIND LOAD (@1OOMPH): 164 LBF ~ WILLIAM F. COLLIN~ AIA -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED A R C H I T I:[ C T ,~, L L P -CONNECTOR ~(pE: 7-15 DIN, FEMALE (4) -COLOR: OFF WHITE -- -STANBARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKuI', NY 11733 -' VOICE : 631-689-8450 FAX : 631-689-8459 http://www.wfcaia.com TOP VIEW ,~IDE ViEW REAR VIEW FRONT VIEW ANTENNA DETAILS SCALE: 1 "= 1 '-0" CO~IJ~TA~-- T NORTEL S18020 EQUIPMENT CABINET SUPPLIED BY CAR,.~IER.p INS,~LLEDT^ BY CONTRACTOR. NO. ELATE REVISION '~~'~ 4-'-34"-5"lb 12 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 1/2" | 13 02/12/1D ISSUED FOR REVIEW · ' ~ 14 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ~ 15 D2/22/IS ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ~ ~ 16 05/05/10 iSSUED FOR REVIEW ~ -- 17 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 18 36/07/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ~ I' ~ 19 36/08/10 ISSUED FOR FILING (10) PROPOSED SONOTUBES TO SUPPOI~r NEW ~ ~ ? '- DATE ~ TO DATE mUEI) TO ACOUSTIC~ SYSTEM. "~ ~ 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW N/03/09 FOR FILING 11/10/08 FOR FILING / 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW EQUIPMENT PLAN % ,.' NORTH -: 12,18/0s FO F,L,NG .~. 04/29/091 FOR FILING I ? 10/15/89 FOR REVIEW PLAN * BAI-EERY PLINTH NORTHSTAR NSB170FT BA%rERY SPECIFICATION MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS ELECTRICAL ALL NORTHSTAR CHARACTERISTICS DRY CELL HIB, PURIW ~_~D ~9.99X S~ UN~TS ENBUSN UNITS B HOUR CAPAC~W TO ~.7a VPC 100.1 AMP-HOURS 170.B PLAN * EQUIPMENT CAB. NOTE: SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR MISSION-CRITICAL REFER TO THE NSB DETAILED AMP-HOURS (2) EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO BE NORTEL S18020 SUPPLIED BY APPLICATIONS. EXCELS AT HIGH-RATE PERFORMANCE TABLES FOR 10 HOUR CAPACITY TO 1.~0 VPC 170 AMP HOURS 172..¢ NOTE: T-MOBILE, AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABINET DISCHARGE AND RECHARGE, EXTREME TEMPERATURE ADDITIONAL CURRENT, CAPACIP( AMP-HOURS (2) BA~q'ERY PLINTHS TO BE NORTEL S1BO00BP MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. RANGE, DEEP OR SHALLOW AND POWER INFORMATION. FLOAT VOLTAGE 2.29 +/- .02 VOLTS PER CELL 2.27 +/- SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE AND ~NSTALLED BY CYCLIC APPLICATIONS. HEIGHT 520.0 MM 12.60 INCHES .02 VOLTS PER CELL CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S18020: .,G. CYCL,D',FECAPAB,L,T¥+SOOC?,@BO DOB. W,DTH 12,.OMM ' .,2,NCHES CYCL,CREC.ARBE 2.',S MPC -- NO CURRENT L,M,T SPEC,E, CAT, ONSA, O ORAW,NBSFORMORE sg-37B',"TALL,,S3- ?6""W,DE,,2B-1S?16"DEEP 10 yEAR FLOAT LIFE AT 25"C (77'F) -- 15 YEAR LENGTH 560,0 MM 22.05 INCHES SHELF LrFE 2 yEARS INFORMATION. CELL CAPACITY: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT FLOAT UEE AT *O'C (66'0. WEIGHT 5~.1 N~LOGRAMS 13~.Z SHORT C~RCU~T CURRENT 6.000 AMPS WE~BBT: ~11.*.2S LBS '% POUNDB VOLTADE VOLTB SPEC,E, CAT,ONS EDR NORTEL S1BO0, _ P: ELECTR,C REOU,REg: : 00-2 0 VAC +10 , EREOUENCY 5 STEP TERMINAL S~L DESIGN TO ENSURE L~K-FREE INCH-POUNDS COMPANY IS PROUD HVAC CAPACI~: 190 WA~S-COOLING ~ 250 W OPERATION. FEMALE M8 BRASS TERMINALS PROVIDE MAXIMUM HIGH RATE PERFORMANCE TO BE REGISTERED TO H~TING ~ NEW BPS UNiT BY NAIS AND NO ANNUAL R~JGHTENING. IS0-9001:2000 AND WEIGHT: 1322 LBS (275 LBS WITHOUT BAKERIES) /MODEL VIC-lO0 INTEGRAL HANDLES ENSURE ~SE OF HANDLING. [S0-14001 STANDARDS. ~ A~ACHED TO BTS APPROVED AS NON-HAZARDOUS CARGO FOR GROUND, FORM: SES-542-06 ISSUED: 05/05/04 ECO: 345-S04 _~ · ~ CABIN~. COORDINATE NORTH ~ ~ ~ EXACT LOCATION WITH - ~ O~ WO~-- S~ AND AIR TRANSPORTATION. / % %T-MOBILE RF ENGINEER, CPS L ADAPTER /~ ~ ~ BRACK~ AND BASKS. ~ Mobile /' ' ~ COAXIAL BPS / ~ ANTENNA CABLE Northeast EEC ~ / INSTALL MOUNTING 3508 SUNRISE HWY. ~ ~ / ANCHORS PROVIDED BY ~ SUITE D-203 ~ ~ k / INSTALLER INTO (4) ~ I GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 ' / MOUNTING HOLES ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ DRILLED, USING BASE . == ~~== ~ = CA~ cow~ THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH =~ = ~ .... OF CUTCHOGUE ,, / x ,, I II I~l ~ I Ilm ,.. Cu~OGUE~ NY 11935 ~j / k ',~ I ~ ' ~ LI2~-807~ ,, / ~ ,, I I I I ~ ' ' ' EQUIPMENT PLAN, ~TENNA DETAILS, ,, ¢~ ~ ~ =~~ '. TYPICAL BATTERY, EQUIPMENT '~__ ¢ ¢ ~ . . ;~ . ~ . .. CABI~T DETALS AND PLANTING DET~ ON GRADE, SEE POURED CONCRETE / ~ / ON GRADE. SEE POURED CONCR~E / ~ / ~ D~G ~0.: EQUIPMENT PAD D~AIL.~ EQUIPMENT PAD D~AIL. ¢ ~/ AS NOTED SECURE NEW T-MOBILE BAKERY CABIN~ TO / SECURE NEW T-MOBiLE S18000BP BAKERY PLINTH TO / NEW CONCR~E PAD WITH 5/4" S/S RODS / NEW CONCR~E PAD WITH 1/2" DROP IN WEDGE ANCHOR / CT S~ IN HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS. / (~P.) ,I I T LOCATION WITH )BILE RF ENGINEER. L ADAPTER ;KET AND BASKET. SAL BPS :NNA CABLE NLL MOUNTING tORS PROVIDED BY ,,- kLLER INTO (4) I qTING HOLES ED, USING BASE . TEMPLATE WILLIAM F. COLLIN,~ AIA (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN A R C H I T E C T $, L L P EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (WP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETAIL 2/SP-5. '7 -- / 12-1 TF. CHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUI~T, NY 11733 ] VOICE = 631--6~-8450 FAX = 631-689-8459 HATCHEDSTEEPLE ToAREABE INDICATESMoDiFiED PONTIONTo OF !! I~ t t [~; ? / w w w . -k65'-0 AGL ~ ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA / :J:65'-0 ACL ~-~ (B) PROPOSEB T-MOBiLE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WiTHIN ~ II I~ /~-- PROPOSED AREAS OF WORK EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (T~P. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE ~ /I I[ ~/ ~%1~,. HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE ~ ~ll~! ~ / :b51'-10" AGL~ MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION ~ I'I~ ~ / :E51'-10" AGL t~ ~. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WiTH ~l~i i~ I [ / ~. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ~ PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING ~ J ~,1 I.J I ~ / STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. ~ ~ PROPOSED AREAS OF WORK ~ V\ PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH ~ ~ ='=='=-~F~ NO. DATE _ 12 01/06/10 SSUED FOR FILING [ H :E42'-9' AGL ~ FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION -- 17 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR FILING EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE J_.j ~ 18 06/07/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 19 ~/08/10 SSUED FOE FILING ~ -~- ~._ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS - ~-- 11/10/08 FOR FILING FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA ~ ~ REVIEW LOCATION ~ 12/%/08 FOR FILING ~ ~]~d EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN -~_ %.~ ~ % /-~ ';7~. ~ ~-ol ~"?~ 04/29/09 FOR FILING To (=o) PROPOSED PROPOSED EOU,PMENT BO ASAREA. AD,AOENT SEE --11 [Fl--Il ) ...... , 'F- ' ,' ;'d" ~. T.O. PROPOSED ACOU~C~ ~ ~EM ~ ~ ~ ~ T-MOBi~ I 'U PME~ , ~ T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT I I I II~1~SCREEN PROPOSED MblbR / DISCONNE~ · ~ U VERIZON T~SECTOR C~IN~. THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ..o.osE~ .OL~S. SEE D~L 2/S.-S OF CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 '~ PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~B~ ~Y MOUN~D TO ~ SIDE OF CHURCH '~ ;T ~UTH~ST E~VATIONS ~ BUILDING. PROPOSED ~BLE ~Y TO BE PN~ED TO MATCH ~P~CE , OF EXI~NG ~RIOR BUILDING WA~ PROPOSED ~TEN~ C~S ROUTED UP ~ROUGH EXI~NG ~; D~ NO.= CHURCH BUI~ING A~IC INTO ~EP~ AS NOTED SOUTHEAST ELEVATION ~NO.' NORTHWESTELEVATION SCALE: 5/1 6"=1 '_0" 5 OF7 __ ~¥ T.O. OF EXISTING 51bbPLE (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET WITHIN ' (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM. SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE, (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE PROPOSED AREAS OF WOR DETNL 2/SP-5. (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM- . / HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE \ \ MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA 1 PROPOSED CPS UNIT MOUNTED TO \ INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE ( ) \ REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT CABINET. \ \ W,.~. OF PROPOSED T_MOBiLE ANTENNAS '"~'I'51'-10' AGL \ ~J'~/~/ MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-5 ~ ~ ~ ~ A R C ['t ' T ]~ C T ~, L J.p WI[.]..[A~,'~ F. COLI. IN ~, A].~i. PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS WITHIN \ \ 'I~ / / Ex,sT.. C.URC..U.LD,.G ATT.C ,NTO ~EP.E PROPOSEO ^COUST.OAL ~EM \ \ \ \ ..2'-.' ^GL ?q (2, PROPOSEOT-MOB.LEEQU,PMENT . \ \ \ PROPOSED T-MOBILE *'E TRAY MOUNTED TO CAR. W.N PROPOSED AOOU=CAL . ~ CA OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS I J SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY ~T~U eCG ~-r^. ~ . ~ ht t TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTING ................. .,-/or-,, -- ~ \ ~ \ \ ~ EXISTING TREES TO R*AIN -- +33'-10" AGL--~ ~ ~ ~- OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNASg ~ ~ __ _~ ~ _ ~.r *¢~ ~ ~ . ~ ~.~ ~- \ \ ~ P. EL MOU.TED TO P.OPOSED U.,~UT BAC~ ~~ -_ ..... ~ -- ~T~ ~~J7¢ \ \ / , PROPOSED VER,ZO. T~SECTOR BOX MO*TED TO ..... I- ~ I ~YC,~~~A~'~, \ \ / / PROPOSED UN,STRUT RACK _ -- \ \ // ,. NO. ~ ~ ~ 13 02/12/10 I~UED FOR REVIEW ~, 14 02/19/10 ~SSUED FOR REVIEW ~ ............... ,I 0'-0" ~ 19 )6/08/10 18SUED FOR FLUNG GRADE ~~_________________________ ~ ~ ~ J I ~ I I Jl J ~ ~----- --~ ~ ~ U U ~ ~ (20) PROPOSED ~BOR~TAE ~aACE~ TO PROPOSED fO/13/OE FOR REVIEW W03/09 FOR FILING ~ / ~ EQUIPMENT AR~. SEE D~NL 2/SP-2 11/10108 FOR REVIEW 11/18/09 FOR REVIEW PROPOSED ACOUSTI~L S~EM FINISHES TO / / ~ 11/10/08 FOE FILING MATCH EXI~ING CHURCH ~ / (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE PPG C~IN~ MOUSED 12/16/08 FOR REVrEW NORTHEAST ELEVATION ,.o.o~. ~-.o.~ .TE.~ c~LE~ ~o .~ .ouT~. ,. / w,~....o.o~..cou~,~, s~. ~=... ~o~ PROPOSED TRENCH TO PROPOSED ~B~ T~Y AT EXI~ING / SCALE: J/1 6" = 1 '-0" CHURCH, THROUGH EXI~NG CHURCH A~IC TO PROPOSED ~ 04/29/0~ FOR FILING ~TEN~ 10/15/09 FOR REVEW D~NL 2/SP-3. ~x,=,~ woo~ ~.~ w,~ ..~,.~ "" ~51'-10" AGL~ EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN X ~ X ~ ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~N~' (2) PROPOSED BOO~ER ~BIN~ WITHIN PROPOSED ACOU~CAL ~EM ~ O~ WO~ NORTH (2) PROPOSED T-MOBI~ EQUIPME~ ~BIN~ W~HIN PROPOSED ~ ~ ~, ~42'-9" AGL~ ACOU~I~L ~EM, SEE D~NL 4/SP-5 ~ ~ ~ jL~J~ % ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE AN~NN~ ' ' Mobile (1) PROPOSED U~ ~IN~ WITHIN PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Northeast LLC FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA /-~ ~l ~ ~ ~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS SUITE D-203 ~ 6REAT RIVER, NY 11759 o) ..o.o~. ~~~..~ w.~.~.o..~. ~ ~ ~ ... ¢ , ~ . ~ A ~.~; . .ocA~,o. ~¢~ ~ ~.c.~. ~ ,...~TEs .o~,o. o~ ~.~ ~o OSE~ "PC CAB'N~ W'TH'N PROPOSED % % X %r ~ ' ~ ~ ,r ~ "~TER'A~ TO BE R~P~C[D W'TH PROPOSED er (1) PROP ~__~¢ ' * I COMPATIB~ CONCB~ENT TO ~TCH EXI~INe ,cou~c~ ~, - ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~~;~ ~~_ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~,~ ,N ~ R~S,~. THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH · ~cm.c .~...,sco..~ sw,.c. ~ X X ~ ~'~~~ ~~~2f ~ ' % ..o.os~. ARTE.. CA.LEs .o.~ u....ouo. OF CUTCHOGUE PROPOSED ~ I · ' m ................. , CUT$~eGUE, NY fl935 PROPOSED VERIZON ~NSECTOR BOX ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~L.~~ I _ _~ ~ = I *6'-10" ~ ' < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >"u~H~~ ~ ~' --~'~~ ~ , if.~ ~0~ ~UT.ST E~VATIO. ~ I 0'-0" ~ PROPOSED 6'-O" HIGH WHffE VINYL ~NOE TO / ~----~--~- ~--~ --~-~--~m--~ , ~ ~ I I II I I ~ ' ' ) GRADE ~ ~: g~O NO.: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,~, , , II I~ Il ~l ~l ...... SCREEN PROPOSED ~R / DISCONNE~ I u [ I ~ I I ~ I ~ u I I ~ I ~ ~ I I~l~ I ~ / AS NO~ED VERIZON T~NSECTOR CABIN~ L~ L~ LJ LJ LJ L~ LJ L~ PROPOSED BO~DS. SEE D~NL 2/SP-6 D~ ~: / IM SOUTHWEST ELEVATION ..o.o~ ~.~.c..o ..o.o~ ~ ,~ ,~ ~x,s~.~ ~ ~, ) ~OALE: 1/1 6"=1 '_0', ANTEN~CHURCH' ~ROUGH ~I~ING CHURCH A~C TO PROPOSED ~ NO.= NM 60F7 ~C~MENTIT]OUS SIMULATED CEDAR SHINGLES ' ~..,_ / /'~ PLYWOOD SHEATHING ~r,l~ iv, i~ i ~FIBER CEMENT CLAPBOARD SIDINGTO MATCH WILLIAM F. COLLINS, Al I IHII ~' I ~1 ~ IN~RIOR W~L C~DING (~E m BE I~ERIOR DOOR C~DDING ~FB r . II Ell ~SE~CTm ~ NECES~Y TO ACHI~ o (~E TO BE SE~ED ~J ~ ' ~ ~ COMPL~NCE WffH TOWN SOUND ORDI~CE) -- ACHI~ COMPE~CE WI~ ~ I~ I , J~ I I~ ~N~ 4 X 4 WOOD PO~S SPACED ~ SHOWN ~ t t ~: / / w w w . w f c a i a . ¢ o TOWN SOUND OR~,~CE) I r~Jl r ~ II ri / o..~. w,, ~ x ~ ~u~s ~ ~s ~IEII I II ~1 ~N~ B~M ~SEMBLY CONSI~ING OF (2) 2 I I~ I ~1 II ~ / x 12 Wl~ ~" PL~OOD SHIM, SPANNING [[RII I ~ I I ~11 / B~EEN ~C~ PO~ m SUPPO~ WALL , ~ 8" ~ICK, 4000 PSI ~ 28 DAYS 13 02/12/10 ISSUED FO~ ~EVIEW AIR-ENT~NED POURED CONCR~E P~ ~1~ 14 02/I~/10 ISSUED FOE ~EVEW ,, ~UNCH AT PERIM~ER. ~ ~ 15 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMEh 16' e POURED CONCR~E SONO~BE PIERS 17 05/05/10 ISSUE~ FOE FILIN~ ~ ~ ~ 4000 PSI AT PO~ LOCA~ONS 18 0b/07/10 ISSUED FO~ REVIEW 4 ~ ~ ~ 19 ~/08/~0 ISSUED FO~ RUNG a ] NOTE: 10/13/08 FOE REVIEW ~11/03/09 FOR FILING ~ . · ALL LUMBER TO ACQ TR~TED 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/18/09 FO~ ~EVlEW ~ " i 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING 04/29/09 FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW + .,c SCALE: 5/4" =1'-0" -3 x 12 CARRIAGE BOL~D TO PO~ W/ (2) S.S, ~RRIA~E BOLTS ~ ~ - ~ RE.ORE PAVEME~ TO MATCH NORTH I ~EXI~ING IN ~ RESPECt. · Mobile '~ ~ ~ortheost G~VEL ~E. ~ ~%~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GREAT RIVER. NY 11739 co.,*~o SUa-~E.~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~' ~ ~ THE PRESBYTERIAN CHUEC~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ OF CUTCHOGUE ~/,x ~ -- ~, ~%~%/~27245 MAIN'~AD ~ x . woo~ .o~ ~. ,N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~2~, CONCR~E AT 4'-0' O,C. .~ ;x,,,~ ¢ . /, ¢¢, ,', DETAIL~ WOOD BOLLARD DETAIL~': .. S)-6 ~CA~E: ~ " = ~ ' O" S"~r N°'= 70~7 IA Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY II 739 [THE PPESBYTEPIAN CHUPCH OF CUTCHO UE) 2724 MAIN PD.. CUTCHOGUE. NY I I Cutch~ WatelMIle <,/, ,',' Mettfluck,' . -: PAUL LaPASOTA ? ! , I~'] CeDars ' Golf Cibb NORTH DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 109 flLOCK: 2 LOT: 17.1 LATITUDE: N 41' 00' 31" ZONING: R40 (RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSH~O LONGITUDE: W 72' 29' 15" NAD: 88 AMSL: 20' LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: RAW[AND EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS IN STEEPLE 165 SQ.FT.J- EQUIPMENT: ANTENNA: (2) S18020 CABINETS, (2) BOOSTER CABINETS, (1) UMTS CABINET AND (1) PPC CABINET (8) ANDREW: TMBXX-6516-R2M & (1) GPS UNIT PROPERTY CONTACT: BUILDING OWNER: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: TOM WlCKHAM (651) 765-5454 THE PRESB'CTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAiN ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 (651) 548-7042 LIPA T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC %MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC PROJECT MANAGER: RF ENGINEER: 3500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D~203, GREAT RIVER, N.Y. 11739 PAUL LAPASOTA (631) 224-6651 MARIANA NEITO (6,31) 224-6600 TITLE SHEET 10/13/08 VICINITY pLAN 10/13/08 SITE PLAN AND PLANTING BETAILS 10/13/08 EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA DETAILS, TYPICAL BATTERY AND EQUIPMENT CABINET BETAILS 10/13/08 NORTHWEST ANB SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONS 10/13/08 NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 10/15/08 DETAILS O6/07/1 0 (1) BATTERY CABINET, MARIANA NEITO NORTH WAYNE SMITH WAYNE SMITH WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOG~ DRIVE 8~TAUKET, ~ 11733 VOICE : 631-(~9-8450 FAX: ~l'-~l~-1]4D http://www.wfcaia.com 01/06/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 02/12/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 06/08/10 06/08/10 o6/o8/10 06/08/10 06/08/10 06/08/10 06/08/10 02/19/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 06/07/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING DKrE 188EIF. D I'0 DATE 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/18/09 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FLING 0,4/29/0~ FOR FILING 10/15/09 FOR REVIEW AREA OF WORK--- I~ql..~ TO FOR FILING FOR REVIEW · T...Mobile- Northeast LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE , ,,., MAIN ROAD ·--''~/'~ /' ,1__"'' CUTCI;IO~UE, NY 11935 ",' "} ~,3~t '~ '~ t~ ~ ", LH3-807-C 10/08/08 AS NOTED DRAWING NO.: 1 OF TITLE SHEET 07-7199 T-1 x~ ~-SWOR¥ A R C H I T E C T S, LLP ~ % ~ '-~ / ~ EXISTING WOODLAND-~/ VOICE = ~ ~ ' ~ ~/~ ~ http://www,wfcaia.com ~ , · / 13 02/12/10 SSUED FOR REVIEW ~ ,~. / / 14 02/19/10 SSUED FOR REVIEW / / 15 02/22/10 $SUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ~ / ' ~ ~ 1-~ORY RESIDENCE / / 19 36/08/10 ISSUED FO~ FILING ~ ~ ~ R~IDENCE ~ h / WI0/08 FOE ~ ORY . I ~ h / ~ h ~ ~ / ~ ' ~ 2 ~ORY ~ ~ ¢ h 1-~0~ CHURCH 7 RESIDEN¢ ~ ~' GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 ~ ~~ -- , _ ~ ~ ~ THE P~ESBYTEBAN CHURCH ~ OF CUTCHOGUE ~ t ~ ~ RESIDENCE ~ ~ ~ 27245 MAIN / J~ ~ ~]~{NITY PLAN AND VANWEELE C[V[L ENGINEERS, SURV~ORS, P~NNEHS ,175A COMMERCE DRIVE~=~ D~ ~ HAUPPAUGE NY 11788 PHONE: {631} 435-1111 JOB NO. A070628 DATED AUGUST 30, 0 35' 70' 140' I CT 2007 SUFFOLK, R~L PROPER~ TAX SERVICE AGENCY, COUN~ CENTER, RIVERHEAD, NY 11901. 1"=70' SCALE: 1"=70'-0" DATEB JUNE 5TH, 2007 NORTH ~ ~o., ~~ 2 OF 7 ¢~, ~ I ~ ~, EXISTING WOOD FENCE PROPOSED T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT AREA, POPU~TION ~POSUREIN PROXI.~TO ~ ,~0 ~ ~ / ~.~ff.: ~ ~ /,~ / / WILLIAM E COLLIN~ AIA SI~ NO. U-13807C ~ PROPOSED ~LE T~Y TO ROU~ ~ -- TO PROPOSED ANTEN~ ~ http://www.wfcaia.eom ~EPLE LO~TED AT ~CO~ ~EL OF T-MOBI~ ~COMMUNI~ONS FACIUW, WHICH PRODUCES ~10 FREQUENCY EMISSION, IN C~E OF EMERGENCY ~LL T-MOBILE / x x , / / 1-888-218-6664 15 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS ~TER~ TO BE R~P~CED W~ PROPOSED RF ~8 ~/07/~ I~SUED FO~ RAVI~W T-MOBI~ SI~ lB ~ U-1~807C ~ ~ OOMPA~BLE ~ONC~MENT TO MATOH EXI~IN~ ~9 06/~8/~ ISSUED FOR HLING ~ ~EEPLE IN A~ R~PEC~. SEE EL~ATIONS PRO. DE ONE SIGN ON ~E DOORWAY TO THE · SP-5 FOR ~DITION~ INFORMATION. ~EPLE LO~T[D ~ ~LCO~ ~EL OF ~/1~/~ FOR ~EVIEW q/03/09 FO~ FILING CHURCH SIGNAGE REOUIREMENT 12/%/08 FO~ FILING 10/15/09 FOR ~EVIEW WI~IN BI~N~ CHURCH ~EPLE, (~P, 2 PER SECTOR) SEE D~L 2/SP-3. NOT~; A070628 DATED AUGUST 50, 2007 NOTE: Northeast LLC BARE ROOT P~NTS WILL NOT BE A mo A, usY, OF CUTCHOGUE WALL ~ SIGN C) NO ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS tS AN UNMANNED SITE, / ~ // ~ 1/2"~ RUBBER HOSE AND 12 GA, GALV. WIREEDGE FENcEOF PAVEMENT o LIGHT POLE D) NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS TH~S IS AN UNMANNED SITE. ~ ~ / WIRE PROVIDE TURN BUCKLES (3) OR ~72~ ~ ~AD E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE./~ CUTCHOGUE, NY ~ ~ STOCKADE FENCE ~ ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX ~/~ ~CEDAR BARK CHIPS (V,UF.) OR ~ ~ PICK~ FENCE ~ TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX F) THERE Will BE NO COBMERCIAL OR R~A~L SIGNS, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE PROPOSED SITE. ~ /~ / EQUIVALENT ,, ...... Ll-ld-~-~ ~ TREE LINE ~ FIRE HYDRANT H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILI~ SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE // ' ~X / / (5) POUNDS PER YARD. WATER PLAN '~ ~ ~(3) CEDA 10/08/08 07-7]99 ~%~ % b~AWN STRAGHT STAKES S~ AT ~ D~ NO.: ~~ 12~ INTERVALS AND, EQUAL-DISTANT ~,~ ~; ~ ~. ~ PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO '% %~-,,i ! ~-"~'~ ~'~'~ '~'~% J ~ (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT '% ~(., .~*~ '*~.% / / AREA. SEE DETNL 2/SP-2 ~.~ _~2~.'~ / / ~ EX,BT,NG WOO0 P,OKET FENCE PROPOSEO T-MOB, W, ,N P.OPOSEO ~L~ / ~L.~ _~ / ~ (1) PROPOSED GPS UNIT MOUSED TO PROPOSED T-MOBI~ EQUIPMENT ~IN~. ~ ~ / ~ ~ / / SEE D~NL ~/SP-3 ON PROPOSED CONCR~E PAD ~~~ -% ~ ~ ~ ~ '2' PROPOSED T MOBILE ~~ / / / ~'({~.~y-~.%~( ) - EQUIPMENT ~BIN~ WITHIN PROPOSED ACOU~I~ PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WH~E VINYL ~NCE TO ~p..~o~:~ffo~c;,~,~co..~c~~ / ~.~ " -%, EQUIPMENT ACCESS (3) DOUBLE ~ (1) SINGLE ANTENNA -MFG: ANDREW - DECIBF! -PART NO.: TMBXX-6516-R2M -±45° DUAL BAND QUAD ANTENNA _,FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH ANDREW TELETILT® REMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA SYSTEM -- MECHANICAL INFO -WEIGHT: 34.6 LBS. -MAX. WIND AREA: 2.9 SQ.FT. -MAX. WIND LOAD (@1OOMPH): 164 LBF -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED -CONNECTOR ~PE: 7-16 DIN, FEMALE (4) -COLOR: OFF WHITE -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 TOP VIEW SIDE ViEW R~R VIEW FRONT ViEW ~ ANTENNA DETAILS SCALE: 1 "= 1 '_0" T NORTEL SlB020 EQUIPMENT CABINET SUPPLIED BY CARRIER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. ~0. ])AI~ R~ON ~~~ t 4'--5" t' 12 01/05,10 ISSUED FOR FILING , 4'--3 1/2" 13 02/12/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ~' I 14 02/19/10 ~SSUED FOR REVIEW ~, 15 02/22/10 SSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS .-~ 16 05/05/10 SSUED FOR ~EVIEW ~ -- 17 05/05/10 SSUED FOR FILING ~o I' ~ ~ 18 05/07/10 SSUED FOR REVIEW (10) PROPOSED SONOTUBES TO SUPPORT NEW ~ ~~ ~~1 19 06/08/10 SSUED FOR FILING ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM m ~ m -- DAT~ ~ TO DATE ]SSOED TO I I 10/13/08 FOR REVJEW 11/03/09 FOR FILING EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN ~ ~ ~ EOUIPMENT PLAN '% ' I .,lO,OR EOR REV,EW REV,SW /~( 11/10/08 FO~ FLUNG SCALE: ~/1 6"= 1' - 0" z{ N 0 RTH ~ ~ ~/~/0~ ~o~ ~ewew . 12/16/0[ FOR FILING ' ~ , m 04/29/0f FOR FILING 10/~5/0f FOR REVIEW ~ ~ PLAN ~ BAKERY PLINTH ~ ~, NORTHSTAR NSB170~ BAKERY SPECIFICATION MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS ELECTRICAL ALL NORTHSTAR CHARACTERISTIO~ ~~ DRY CELL HIGH PURI~ L~D 99.99% SI UNITS ENGLISH UNITS 8 HOUR CAPACI~ TO 1.75 VPC 168.1 AMP-HOURS 170.8 PLAN ~ EQUIPMENT CAB NOTE: SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR MISSION-CRiTICAL REFER TO THE NSB D~AILED AMP-HOURS -. APPLICATIONS. EXCELS AT HIGH-RATE PERFORMANCE TABLES FOR 10 HOUR CAPACJ~ TO 1.80 VPC 170 AMP-HOURS 172.4 NOTE: (2) EQUIPMENT CABIN.S TO BE NORTEL S18020 SUPPLIED BY -. T-MOBILE, AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CABIN~ DISCHARGE AND RECHARGE, EXTREME TEMPERATURE ADDITIONAL CURRENT, CAPACI~ AMP-HOURS (2) BAKERY PLINTHS TO BE NORTEL S18000BP MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. RANGE, DEEP OR SHALLOW AND POWER INFORMATION. FLOAT VOLTAGE 2.29 +/- .02 VOLTS PER CELL 2.27 +/- SUPPUED BY T-MOBILE AND INSTALLED BY CYCLIC APPLICATIONS. HEIGHT ~20.0 MM 12.60 INCHES .02 VOLTS PER CELL CONTRACTOR. REFER TO CAB[N~ MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTEL S180~; HIGH CYCLIC LIFE CAPABILI~ +500 C/5~ 80% DOD. W,DTH 125.0 MM 4.92 INCHES CYCLIC RECHARGE 2.45 VPC -- NO CURRENT LIMIT SPECIF, CAT,ONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE 59-5/64" TALL x 53 1/64" WIDE x 28-15/16" DEEP '*~0 %~~ ~¢~ 10 Y~R FLOAT LIFE AT 25'6 (77"F) -- 15 Y~R LENGTH 560.0 MM 22.05 INCHES SHELF LIFE 2 Y~RS INFORMATION. CELL CAPACI~: ~2 TRX CALLS PER UNIT FLOAT LIFE AT 20'C (68'F), WEIGHT 59.1 KrLOGRAMS 131.2 SHORT CIRCUJT CURRENT 5,000 AMPS WEIGHT: 111~.28 LBS F~ME RETARDANT (UL 94 VO) PC-ADS P~STIC CASE POUNDS VOLTAGE 12 VOLTS SPECIFICATIO~,,FOR "OR~E~ S18000BP; ELECTRIC REQU'RED: 208-240 VAC ~10%, FREQUENCY 45-65 Hz ¢0. ~ x/--.. ~..' AND OOVERI 'E"MINAL TORQUE 810 IMPEDANCE (1KHZ) ' i 5 "w 19'' BlOB. WIDE. DEEP --'' ~ ~/ ~P 5 STEP TERMINAL S~L DESIGN TO ENSURE L~K-FREE NE~ON-M~ERS 71 NORTHSTAR BAKERY BAKERY CAPACI~: 170 Ah TO 540 Ah OPERATION. FEMALE M8 B~SS INCH-POUNDS COMPANY IS PROUD HVAC CAPACI~: 190 WA~S-COOLING & 250 W TERMINALS PROVIDE MAXIMUM HIGH RATE PERFORMANCE TO BE REGISTERED TO H~TING AND NO ANNUAL R~IGHTENING. IS0-9001:2000 AND WEIGHT: 1~22 LBS (275 LBS WITHOUT BAkERiES) ~MODELNEW GPSvlc_iooUNIT BY NAIS INTEGRAL HANDLES ENSURE ~SE OF HANDLING. IS0-14001 STANDARDS, ~ ~ A~ACHEB TO BTS APPROVED AS NON-HAZARDOUS CARGO FOR GROUND, FORM: SES-542-06 ISSUED: 05/05/04 ECO: 543-S04 =~ ~ ~ CABIN~. COORDINATE NORTH S~ AND AIR TRANSPORTATION. ¢ ~ ~ ~ EXACT LOCATION WITH ~ ~ --I' ', '~ ~ O~ WO~ / % %T-MOBILE RF ENGINEER I GPS L ADAPTER "-" + "-" + '" "-" + ' ' X · Mobile = ~ % ANTENNA CABLE Northeast LLC i ~ 'k / iNSTALLER INTO (4) T GREAT RIVER, NY M759 ~ ~ ~ ~/~ DRILLED, USING BASE m ? I' ==~8~ ~ ¢~===~ ~ ===~ ~ ~ THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCF , , : Ee TCHOGUE GUE, NY 11~35 ~~ . m m m ~ ~ m m mm / ~ I m EQUIPMENT PLAN,ANTENNA DETAIL8 ~ -., .... ~ ~ , TYPICAL BATTERY, EQUIPMENT ,,,"~ ~ ' . ,. ~ . :-'. . .- ~ .-= = '.~ - . ,. ~ ~.~ . . ' ~ '-- ~ '-- ~. . ~ ---. - .. ~ .' ,,.. , ~ .-' ~' .-'. . . ,~' [ ~. ~ . V ~ '~''... .' . ,. :... CABI.TDETALSA~P~TINGDET~L PLAN · EQUIPMENT CAB. . .' ~ -' ~, ..... - ' I . .' ,:. ~ ~,o.: ~ ~ ON GRADE. SEE POURED CONCR~E / ~ / ON GRADE. SEE POURED CONCR~E ~ D~O NO.: I MINIMUM 3-1/2" EMBEDMENT. (~P.) ~ ~P. BAKERY CABINET DETAILS ~PICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS ~ - ~I SCALE: Z/4"=1'-0" SCALE: Z/4":1'-0" ~o.' ~ OF7 ' -- I 1 (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. OYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETAIL 2/SP-5. EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. OYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE DETNL 2/SP-3. :L65'-0 AGL T.O, OF EXISTrNG STEEPLE -- PROPOSED AREAS OF WORK HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSEB ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIREB, REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO BE REPLACED W1114 PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATTIC INTO STEEPLE FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL +51'-10" AOL ¢~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS 4'42'-9" AGL ~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ±5.~'- 10" AGL ~- OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS PROPOSED AREAS OF WORK -- EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE- FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA LOCATION EXISTING WOOD RAMP WITH HANDRAILS (20) PROPOSED ARBORVITAE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA. SEE DETAIL 2/SP-2 PROPOSED T-MOBILE ACOU~CAL SYSTEM PROPOSED VERIZON TRANSECTOR BOX MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISI~RUT RACK PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE TO SCREEN PROPOSED METER / DISCONNECT & VERIZON TRANSECTOR CABINET. I PROPOSED BOLLARDS. SEE DETNL 2/SP-6 ~:10'-0" AG ,~, T.O. PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL · SYSTEM T.O. T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT I NORTHWEST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 1 scArE: SCAL : EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE '~ +51'-10" AGL 6. OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNA ::1:,4-2'-9" AGL [ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ±33'-10" AGL ~ 6_ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS "~ T-MOBILE GRADE PROPOSED BOLLARDS. SEE DETNL 2/SP-6 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN PROPOSED T-MOBILE ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM 'X~ PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST SIDE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY TO BE PNNTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES ROUTED UP THROUGH EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ATTIC INTO STEEPLE WILLIAM E COLLIN& AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE 8ETALq(ET, NY 11733 VOICE : 6al-689-84~0 FAX: 631-689-84~ http://www.wfcaia.com CONSULTANT:. REVISION ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVEW 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/05/10 ISSUED FOR FILING 06/07/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR FILING DATE [~-"UU, L~ 'TO DATE 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 q/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/10/08 FOR RUNG FOR REVIEW FOR FIMNG FOR FILING FOR REVIEW FILING FOR REVIEW AREA OF WORK T.. -Mobile. Northeast LLC 5500 SUNRISE HWY, SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245' MAIN ROAD NY ":",'" L1-13-807-C NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST ELEVATION8 DATE: PR(XIF_CT NO.: 10/08/08 07-7199 SCALE: DRAWING NO,: AS NOTED DRAWN BY: IM CHECKI~ BY: NM 5OF 7 SP-4 +65'-0 AGL ~ (1) PROPOSED T-MOBILE BATTERY CABINET WITHIN T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE~ PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM. SEE DETAIL 3/SP-3 (8) PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WITHIN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE. (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR) SEE \ DETAIL 2/SP-5. (1) PROPOSED UMTS CABINET WITHIN \ PROPOSED AREAS OF WORK- PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM -- ~ \ HATCHED AREA INDICATES PORTION OF STEEPLE TO BE \ \ MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED ANTENNA - - " " (1) PROPOSED GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. REMOVAL MATERIALS TO SE ~=~^~n T .~=,.~ =n.,m*~k,T ~*m,~,~ \ \ W REPLACED WITH PROPOSED RF COMPATIBLE CONCEALMENT TO rn~rv~u .-.mv~,~ ~w ............... /~51'-10' AOL¢~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS I MATCH EXISTING STEEPLE IN ALL RESPECTS. SEE DETAIL 4/SP-3 -- ~ ~ ~ A R C H I T E C T S, LLP Om~mn=rn &kl?rmmA ~Al=l ~ ROUTED UP TWI3~IIt3-U (2) PROPOSED BOOSTER CABINETS WITHIN \ \ 1~42'-9" AGL PROPOSED T-MOBILE CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EAST CABINETS WITHIN PROPOSED ACOUSTICAL ' SlOE OF CHURCH BUILDING. PROPOSED CABLE TRAY SYSTEM SEE DETAIL ~/SP-3 -- ¢~ OF PROPOSED T-MOBILE ANTENNAS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH APPEARANCE OF EXISTING ' - \ \ ~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS -~ ~ LOCATION I ,. }¢ r PROPOSED ELECTRIC METER / DISCONNECT SWITCH ~ ~ i~? ,J~ J ~~,~ ~ ~ \ \ / PANE. MOU.~D TO PROPOSEO U.,STRUT RACK 13 02/12/10 SSUED FOR REVIEW -- ---- ~ =__ = = 15 32/22/10 SSUED FOR FILING PER TOWN COMMENTS 19 3~/08/10 ISSUED FOR FILING " .......................... ~~ ~ : ~ ~ : (20) PROPOSED ~BO~ITAE AD,ACE~ TO PROPOSED 10/13/08 FO~ ~EVIEW fl/03/09 FOR RUNG PROPOSED ACOUSTI~L ~~ / 2/16/08FOR REVIEW MATCH ~I~ING CHURCH / WI~IN(1) PROPOSEDpRoPOsEDT-MOBI~ACOU~i~LPPC ~EM~IN~ MOUNTED ~2/16/08 FOR FILING PROPOSED T-MOBI~ ~TENNA CABLES TO BE ROUTED IN / ~4/29/09 FOR FILING NORTHEAST ELEVATION ..o.o~ ~.~.~. ~o ..o.o~ c~LE ~ ~ Ex,~,.~ CHURCH, THROUGH ~I~NG CHURCH A~C TO PROPO~ ~/15/09FOR REVIEW SCALE: ~/~6" =~'-0" EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE T.O. OF EXISTING STEEPLE~ ~ OY WO~ *c°u~'A ~["' SEE DBAIL "SP-~ ~ X X (2) ,2) PROPOSED BOO.ER ~B,NB W~,N PROPOSED ACOU~C. ~. PROPOSED PROPOSED ACOU~ICAL T-MO.IEs~[M [~U.PM[~ W.H FIN.SHES ~.,NB TO Wl~.N ~TCH PROPOSED [X.ZNO . . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : -- ~ Z~ . ~" '" ' ~ OF PROPOSED T-.OBIE *.2'-.' ~TENN~ ~GL~ ~Northeast "" Mobile · (1) PROP~M~ ~IN~ WlmlN PROPOSED X X ~ ~ ~ AGL~ SUITE 0-203 ACOU~I~ S~ (~D) ~ ~ % % ~ ~ FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNa-LOCATiON - ~ ~ HATCHED AR~ OF FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNASiNDiCATES PO~ON OF ~EP~ TO 6EEAT RIVER. NY 1175, - ANTEN~ INACTION ~ REQUIRED. REMOV~ ~TE.~,~ To ~E .E.~CED WiT. ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~< / ~PLE ,N ~ .~PEC~. THE PRESBYTEBAN CHURCH m U~CHOGUE, NY ~935 PROPOSE i ....... T.O. PROPOSED ACOU~I~L ~ .i]i~ ', MOUN~D I - ~EM PROPOSE I ~s'-lo' ~ ' ' ~UTH~ST ~EVAT~NS 2/SP-2 ~ ~ ~ I ~ T.~ ~0~ R IM VERIZON .NSECTOR C~IN~ PROPOSED BO~DS. SEE D~NL 2/SP-6 PROPOSED T-MOBI~ A~ENNA CABLES TO BE ROUTED IN NM PROPOSED TRENCH TO PROPOSED CAB~ ~Y AT ~I~ING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION c...c.. TH.o.~. ~,~..~ c.u.¢...,c ~o ..o.o~ ~ ~o.. OF 7 SCALE: 1/1 6"=1 '-0" ~TENN~ 12 HEADER HINGED BARN DOOR FOR EDUIPMENT INSTraqlOR DOOR CLADDING ('~YPE TO BE SELECTED AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN SOUND ORDINANCE) GRADE SECTION AT ACOUSTIC SYSTEM SCALE: 5/4" =1 '-0" COMPACTED SAND AND GRAVEL BASE. COMPACTED SUB-BASE. 8 X 8 WOOD POST SET IN CONCR~I~ AT 4'-0' O.C. G WOOD BOLLARD DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 1 '-0" SIMULA~r-D CEDAR SHINGLES PLYWOOD SHEATHING ~RS 0 16' O.C. CONTINUOUSLY VENTED VINYL SOFFiT PANEL --DOUBLE TOP PLATE CEMENT CLAPBOARD SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING CHURCH WALL CLADDING (TYPE TO BE SELECTED AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WiTH TOWN SOUND ORDINANCE) 4 X 4 WOOD POSTS SPACED AS SHOWN ON PLAN WITH 2 X 4 STUDS AT 16' O.C. BEP~EEN BEAM ASSEMBLY CONSISTING OF (2) 2 X 12 WITH ~' PLYWOOD SHIM, SPANNING BE~EEN VERTICAL POSTS TO SUPPORT WALL FRAMING 8' THICK, 4000 PSI 0 28 DAYS AIR-ENTRAINED POURED CONCRETE PAD WITH HAUNCH AT PERIMETER. 16' ¢ POURED CONCREiE SONOTUBE PIERS 4000 PSI AT POST LOCATIONS NOTE: ALL LUMBER TO ACQ TREATED 3 X 12 CARRIAGE BOLTED TO POST W/ (2) S.S. CARRIAGE BOLTS CUT EDGES TO BE PRESERVED WEATHERPROOF TREATMENT PAVEMENT TO MATCH EXISTING IN ALL RESPECTS. WILLIAM E COLLINS, AIA AR C H I T E C T S, LLP 12-1 T~-X'tNOLOGY DRIVE S~TA.tJIO:H', NY 11733 VOICE: 631-6~4~0 FAX: 631'-(~9-~4~9 http://www.wfeaia.com ECATE REVIfilON 01/06/10 iSSUED FOR RUNG 02/12/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/17/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 02/22/10 ISSUED FOR FLING PER TOWN COMMENTS 05/05/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 05/05/10 iSSUED FOR FLING 06/07/10 ISSUED FOR REVEW 06/08/10 FOR FILING DA']~, ~l.lld.~ 1'O DAT~ 10/13/08 FOR REVIEW 11/03/09 11/10/08 FOR REVIEW 11/18/09 11/10/08 FOR FILING 12/16/08 FOR REVIEW 12/16/08 FOR FILING 0,4/29/05 FOR FLUNG 10/15/0S FOR REVIEW ~ PLAN= FOR FLt~G FOR REVIEW · 1:.- .Mobile- Northeast LLC 5500 SUNRISE HWY. SUITE D-20S GREAT RIVER, NY 11759 THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE 27245 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 U-13-807-C dub! 1 1 2olo DETAILS AS NOTED NM NO.: 7 OF7 SP-6