HomeMy WebLinkAbout6238 80 Lakeside
THOFIASHZ~GINS
Const~uc% deck addition to dwellin~
with meductionof fmontyamd setback f~om Cedar
P~int Dr.E.
AGTIO~ DA~E: 8/1~/8~
APPEALS BOARD MEM
Gerard E Goehringer, Chairman
Ruth D. Oliva
James Dinizio, Jn
Michael A. Simon
Leslie Kanes Weisman
http://southoldtown.north fork.net
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064
Mailing Address:
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
Office Location:
Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 11971
FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMIN.4h!~OId TOWll Clerk
MEETING DATE: ,JANUARY 22, 2009
ZBA # 6238 - JACQUELINE MOSKOWITZ, Applicant
PROPERTY LOCATION: 80 Lakeside Drive and Cedar Point Drive, Southold
CTM 1000-90-3-14
SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property
under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under
the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under
SEQRA.
SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application has been
referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14
to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning reply states that the
application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no
significant county-wide or inter-community impact.
PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a 14,118 square foot
nonconforming lot in the R-40 District and is improved with a single-family dwelling
with attached carport and accessory in ground swimming pool. The irregular,
triangular shaped lot has two front yards and measures a total of 192.05 feet along
Lakeside Drive, a total of 161.36 feet along Cedar Point Drive, and 134.68 feet along
the rear yard.
BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances on this 14,118 square foot lot,
under Zoning Code Sections 280' 122 and 280-124, based on applications for building
permits and the Building Inspector's August 22, 2008 Notice of Disapproval, and
Zoning Code Interpretation ZBA #5039 (R. Walz), concerning construction of a
pergola, fence height, swimming pool, and as-built carport structure, for the reasons
that:
(1) the proposed pergola to be added to the dwelling structure is not
permitted because such additions/alteration will constitute an increase in the
degree of nonconformance (nonconforming rear yard setback and front yard
setback, see ZBA #3255 of August 14, 1984;
Page 2 of 4- January 22,
ZBA # 6238 - Jacqueline
CTM Parcel 1000-90-3-14
(2) the fence is not allowed as per Conditions under ZBA #3950 dated July
11, 1990 which states: the fence and any screening shall not exceed 4 ft. 6 in.
in height in front yard areas above grade, the area beginning at a point of 30
feet from the corner of Cedar Point Drive to 30 feet from the corner of
Lakeside Drive shall remain open and un-vegetated;
(3) the existing swimming pool under Building Permit #19275 issued July
27, 1990 is located at less than the required minimum of 22 feet under ZBA #
3950 dated July 11, 1990;
(4) the existing carport shows setbacks from each the front yard and rear
yard at less than the code-required minimum of 35 feet.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on January 8,
2009, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all
testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence,
the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant:
AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes:
To construct a 14.1 ft. × 18.8 ft. wooden pergola/sunscreen to sit above a part
of an existing wood deck which will maintain the existing non-conforming
28.2 ft. front yard setback from Cedar Point Drive, and the existing non'
confbrming 16.3 ft. rear yard setback,
To construct a 6 ft. high decorative wood fence approximately 90 Linear feet
on Cedar Point Drive and approximately 90 linear feet on Lakeside Drive
which is not permitted in front yards and by virtue of the previous ZBA
Variance #3950 (see above),
To obtain a variance for the as-built accessory swimming pool that was built
at 20.8 ft. from the property boundary along Cedar Point Drive in error of the
building permit and variance previously granted at 22 ft. (see above),
To obtain a variance for an as-built carport with a non-conforming setback of
25.7 feet from Lakeside Drive and a nonconforming rear yard setback of 15
feet, as shown on the 9-04-08 diagram A-1 prepared by Boulevard Planning,
P.C.
REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials
submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings:
1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3)(1).
Grant of the variances for the proposed pergola and as-built swimming pool and
carport will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood
or a detriment to nearby properties.
Page3of4 January 22,
ZBA # 6238 Jacqueline Mosko~vitz
CTM Parcel 1000 90 3 14
a) The proposed pergola is a light structure that will maintain the current non-
conforming setbacks of the as built deck and will not be visible to nearby properties
because of the existing heavy vegetation.
b) The accessory pool is as built and has existed since 1990 by virtue of an error in
its placement during the original installation. Granting a variance to legalize the
existing location will not change the character of the neighborhood.
c) The as-built carport is attached to the house, and is a small (20 ft. x 12.4 ft.), light
weight, open structure that is located in a logical relationship to the driveway, house
and Lakeside Drive. It has a reasonable setback from both the street (25.7 ft.) and
the side/rear yard (15 ft.) and has no adverse visual or environmental impacts on the
neighborhood.
Grant of the variance for the proposed fence will produce an undesirable change in
the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The
applicant's property is a corner lot that has two street frontages and an odd
triangular shape. As such, it is seen by many other homeowners traveling on those
streets. The neighborhood has a very open, rural feel to it, and no other 6 ft. high
fences are in the immediate vicinity. The applicant has done extensive plantings to
create privacy for their pool and, like other homeowners in the neighborhood, has
added high post and wire fencing for deer control. It is the Board's feeling that a
solid wood fence that is 6 ft. high in the applicant's two front yards would not be in
keeping with the character of the neighborhood and upholds the previous ZBA
Variance g3950.
2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefits sought by the applicant for a proposed
pergola and as built carport and swimming pool cannot be achieved by some method,
feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances because all of the
variances applied for are already related to existing non-conformities.
The benefits sought by the applicant for a proposed 6 ft. high solid wood fence in two
front yards can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,
other than an area variance because additional privacy for the pool area can be
achieved through creating a berm and additional plantings on the applicant's
property.
3. Town Law ~267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are not substantial with
regard to the as built carport, as built accessory swimming pool and proposed
pergola, but is substantial in terms of the proposed 6 ft. fence height where the code
permits a maximum height at 4 feet for a fence in a front yard.
4. Town Law ,~267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has not been self-created with regard to
the as-built pool and proposed pergola but is the result of a very oddly shaped lot
with two front yards. The difficulty has been self-created with regard to the as-built
carport and proposed wood fence since the carport was built without a permit or the
Page 4 of 4 January 22, $
ZBA# 62',38 gacqueline Moskowitz
CTM Parcel 1000-90-3-14
possibility of conforming setbacks and the applicant chose to install a pool in their
front yard where the code does not permit a 6 ft. high fence.
5. Town Law §267'b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a
variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical
or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Variances for the proposed
pergola, as~built pool, and carport will not involve any grade changes, excavation,
filing, and/or clearing done to the property.
6. Town Law ,~267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary
and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a carport, accessory pool
and pergola, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and
the health, safety and welfare of the community.
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and
applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered
by Member Weisman, seconded by Member , and duly carried, to
GRANT the variances as applied for regarding the proposed pergola, the as-
built carport, and the as-built swimming pool, as shown on Sheet Number A-
l dated 9-4-08 drawn by Boulevard Planning P.C. Architects and submitted
by Peconic Permit Expediting, and to
DENY the variance as applied for regarding a proposed 6 ft. high wood fence
as shown on Sheet Number A'I dated 9-4-08 drawn by Boulevard Planning
P.C. Architects and submitted by Peconic Permit Expediting.
Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not
shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this
application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not
authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject
property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features
as are expressly addressed in this action.
The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for
an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer (Chairman), Dinizio, Oliva, Simon,
and Weisman. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0).
RUTH D. OLIVA, VICE CHAIRWOMAN 2/6/2009
Approved for Filing
5URVE'r' OF: LOT &l
"50t~DIVISION HAP OF CEDAR BEACH PARK"
FILEP IN THE OFFIGE OF THE C, LEPJ< OF SUFFOLK
CO~N~' ~C. 20, ,~2~ AS MAP NO. 40
SITUA'I~: BA~VIE~I
TOINN. ~OUTHOLO
5UFFOL<. GOUN'I"¢, N"r'
5URVE'CEp, ALY-_~L~T 05, 2OO6
SUFFOLK C, OUN'FT TAX #
1(2OO -40- ~- 14
~'ACQURLII~ A. I~OSKOWETZ
N
~00%
c HOus~
NOTES:
LAND SURVEYOR
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901
369-8288 Fax 369-8287
REF.\\Compaqserver\pros\08\08-162.pro
TO:
FORM NO. 3
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL
Jacqueline Moskowitz
C/O Peconic Permits Expediting, Inc.
32645 Main Road
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Please take notice that your application dated August 19, 2008
For a pergola, six foot fence, in-ground pool and "as built" carport to an existing single
family residence;
Location of property 80 Lakeside Drive Southold, NY
County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 9~0_0 Block 3 Lot 14
Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds:
The proposed pergola (see ZBA grant appl.#3255 dated August 14, 1984) to this existing
single family dwelling, on a non-conforming 14~118 square foot lot in the Residential R-40
District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-122, which states;
"Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction
or enlargement of a non-conforming building containing a conforming use, provided
that such action does not create any new non-conformance or increase the degree of
non-conformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings."
The existing single family dwelling notes a rear yard setback of 16.3 feet and a front yard
setback to Cedar Point Drive of 28.2 feet. The new construction will maintain those
setbacks. Pursuant to the ZBA's interpretation in Walz (#5039), such additions and
alterations will thus constitute an increase in the degree of non-conformance.
The proposed fence is not allowed per the prior Zoning Board of Appeals grant application
No.3950 dated July 11, 1990, which states "that the fence and any screening not exceed 4 ft.
6 in. in height in front yard areas above grade, the area beginning at a point of 30 ft. from
the corner of Cedar point Drive to 30 ft. from the corner of Lakeside Drive remain open
and un-vegetated."
The existing in ground pool under permit number 19275 issued 7/27/90, which has no
certificate of occupancy, is located at 20.8 feet (not including brick patio)from Cedar Point
Drive instead of the approved 22 feet per the Zoning Board of Appeals grant No. 3950 dated
July 11~ 1990.
Further, pursuant to Section 280-124 non-conforming lots with less than 20~000 sq. ft. the
front and rear yard setbacks shall be 35 feet. The existing carport, on this 14,118 S.F. lot
with two front yards, shows a front yard setback to Lakeside Drive of 25.7 feet and a rear
yard setback of ,15 feet. .
Authorized Signature
Office Location:
Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 11971
Mailing Ad&ess:
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
http://southoldtown.north fork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064
February 4,2009
Ms. JacquelineMoskowitz
c/o Peconic Permits Expediting, Inc.
32645Main Road
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: ZBA File No. 6238 - Application for Variance (J. Moskowitz Premises)
Attn: Rob Lehnert
Dear Mr~nert and Ms. Moskowitz:
Please find enclosed copy of the Zoning Board of Appeals determination
rendered on January 22, 2009.
Before commencing construction activities, a building permit and
Possibly other agency approval(s) would be necessary. Please be sure to follow-
up with the Building Department for the next step of the application process.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Copy of Decision on 2/4 to:
Building Department
owalski
EXISTING PRIVACY
FENCE TO REMAIN -
,odC~.
po{~°
9\
poOL
FRO?OSED
6' 0" IdEIGIflT
~ PRIVACY
FENCE
ous£
LiN F.__~~ ~
EXISTING CHAIN ~,~ ~.
FENCE TO BE REMOVED LOT 81
LOT 104
SCALE: I "=20' ~
INffOPxMATION flOR PLOT PLAN TAKEN ffROM 5U~V~ BY~
JOHN EHLERS LAND 5URVEYOR DATED: AUGUST
2008
SITE AND ZONING DATA
ZONING REQUIREMENTS R-40 EXISTING CONDITION~ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
AD PER 280 - 124
LOTAREA 14, I leS.E, 14, 1185.ff.
ffRONTYARDDETDACK 35.0 PT I 1. 5 PT. ¢ 20. & FT. I l, 5 PT. ,$ 20. & FT.
REAR YARD SETBACK 35.0 ~[ ] 2. 6 PT,
SIDE YARD SETBACK I 0.0 PT N / A N / A
TOTAL ~ DOTH 51DES 25.0 PT N / A N / A
MAX. G~.ODD FLOOR AREA 20% 33 I e S.ff. 23.5% 33 I D B.P. 23.5%
MAXIMUM HEIGHT 35,0' FT 20. O' PT 20. O' PT
THEt;~E Af~E NO Ot~.ADE CHANGES, EXCA'v'ATION, FILLINO, ~,N~/O~ CLEA~INC~ [~ONE TO THIS f=ROPEF~T¥
r_!5-~ol
16¥
'ERGOLA
TO BIT ABOVE
EXIBTING DECK
EXISTrNG DINING ROOM
III
Ill
Ill
III
I/ I ~ I I
18'-10"
PERGOLA PLAN
SCALE: I/4" = I' 0"
WEST ELEVATION
5CALZ: I/4" = I'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION
DCAL~: I/4" = ILO''
CENTERLINE Off
COLUMN
2x8 CEDAR
RAffTER
(2)2x I 0 CEDAR I'- t"
GIRDER ' >,,
PERGOLA DEl'AIL
SCALE: I" =
COLUMN DETAIL
5CALF N.T.5.
q.
LJ
CARPORT PLAN
SCALE: I/4" = }'-0"
PROPOSED
PRIVACY FENCE
& PERGOLA
AT THE
KASABA RESIDENCE
80 LAKESIDE DRIVE
SOUTHOLD, N.Y.
S.C.T.M. # 1000-90-3-14
REVISIONS
DATE;
BOULEVARD PLANNING P.C
ARCHITECTS
671 FRANKLIN AVENUE
GARDEN CITY, N.Y.
516.877.0400
PECONIC PERMIT
EXPEDITING
PHONE: 63 I .734.83G I
ITIIESE PLANS AND SPECIFCATIONS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND ARE TIlE PROPERTY OF PECONIC PERMIT EXPEDITING [NC
INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE PROSECUTED
DATE: 9-4-08
DR. BY:RWL
SCALE: AS NOTED
CHKD:
PROJECT NUMBER SIIEET NUMBER
0819 A-1
Photo of Existing Car Port
Photo of Proposed l.ocatim
Proposed Location of Privacy Pool 1 encmg View fi'om West
Proposed Location of Privacy Pool Fencing- View from East
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN HALL
SOUTHOLD, NY 11971
TEL: (631) 765-1802
FAX: (631) 765-9502
SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net
Examined ,20
Approved ,20
Disapproved a/c ~ 12~-10~
PERMIT NO.
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Do you have or need the following, before applying?
Board of Health
4 sets of Building Plans
Planning Board approval
Survey
Check
Septic Form
N.Y.S.D.E.C.
Trustees
Flood Permit
Storm-Water Assessment Form
Contact:
Mailto:
Phone:
Expiration
Building Inspector
ICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
Date
INSTRUCTIONS
/'7 , 20 aR
a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4
sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule.
b. Plot plan showing location Of !ot.and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining preinises or public streets or
areas, and waterways.
c. The work covered by this application may nos be commenced before issuance of Building Permit.
d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit
shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work.
e. No building shall be OcCupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector
issues a Certificate of Occupancy.
f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of
issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the
property have been enacted in the interim; the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an
addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required..
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issua'nce of a Building Permit pursuant to the
Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. and other applicable Laxvs, Ordinances or
Regulations, for the,construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or tbr removal or demolition as herein described. The
applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, an~,t,o admit
authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspecti~~~
J./~Sig~a~e o~aapp~ccant-or name, if a corporation)
(Mailing address of applicant) '
Name of owner of premises
If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer
State whether applicant ig owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder
· (As on the tax roll or latest deed)
(Name and title of corporate officer)
Builders License No.
Plumbers License No.
Electricians License No.
Other Trade's License N~
}lSlOv '#31~
1. Location of land on ~ ~ee~ork will be done:
House Num~~ ~'~
Hamlet
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ~t5? Block .~
Subdivision Filed Map No.
Lot ~
Lot
2. State existing use and occupancy of premises angl intended use ~nd occupancy of proposed construction:
a. Existing use and occupancy
b. Intended use and occupancy
3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Addition t>~ Alteration
Repair Removal Demolition Other Work
Estimated Cost Fee
If dwelling, number of dwelling units
garage, number of cars
(Description)
(To be paid on filing this application)
Number of dwelling units on each floor
6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. fi,//~t
7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth
Height. Number of Stories
Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front i ..~._,,~_,~_Rear
Depth Height_ Number o~Sl~1~ I
8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear : . . Depth
Height Number of Stories ' '
9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth
10. Date of Purchase [ ~;~,~"' Name of Former Owner /-/~,~q / r~/5
11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated /~ - ~t g7
12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES ~ NO__
13. Will lot be re-graded? YES__ NO X~ Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES__ NO ,,~
14. Names of Owner of premises #I~',sACO ~z/'~--
Name of Architect ~Ju'~
Name of Contractor
Address
Address
Address
Phone No.
Phone No ~'/['~'77- 0 qr~ o
Phone No.
15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal ~vetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES__ * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES__ NO ~
* IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
NO ~
16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines.
17. If elevation at any poinf on pi:operty is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey.
18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES
· IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY.
NO )<
STATE OF NEW YORK)
SS:
COUNTY OF )
/~ O l '~ ~ ~- ~ ~//-~ 4 being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant
(Name of individual signing contract) above named,
/
(S)He is the //~ ~- ~o~,~ -~ tc
(Contr~tor, Agent, Corporate Officer, e .)
of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;
that all statements contained in this application are tree to the best of his knowledge ~qllj~ the work will be
performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Nervy ~Ll~.lt~lg OF NEW
No, O~'MC6131514
Sworn to before me this
/.,~ day of ,~.,~t~-4t 20 Oi:~L)
$ ¢-a'r ')~yffblic ~ J
FORM NO. 4
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Office of the Building inspector
Town Hail
Southold, N.Y.
Certificate Of Occupancy
No. Z13205 Date Feb. 8 ........ 1915.5.
THIS CERTIFIES that the building New Dwelling ............
.~.~5 Cedar. Point Dr. East Southold
La~keslde Dr. ' ........................... ~/,~r~/e ~'
Location of Property ... '- ........................ Street
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 090 . .Block 03 ...... Lot .. · 0.1.4. ..........
Subdivision Cedar Beach Park .Filed Map No..9.0. ..... Lot No. 81
conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated
.... .J.u.l.~ ...... 2. .4 ..... 19,8.3. pursuant to which Building Permit No, .. 1..2.5.5. 5. Z. ............
dated ...... .A.u.q: .... 2. .7 ........... 19 .8.3~ , was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements
of thc applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which tlfis certificate is issued is ......... New Private One Family Dwellin~
THOMAS & ANNE HIGGINS ...........
The certificate is issued to ..................... io'a;nb), ~s~2~-'~'~ ..........
of the aforesaid building.
Suffolk County Department of Health Approval 13- SO- 9 0
N674764
UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO ..................................................
Bnilding Inspector
%'UF FOL.K CO. HE~L.T H DIEPT. ~
APPLICANT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD
OWNER 5-rREET ~ ~5 VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT ,~ /
FOp, Nt~R O~/NER "" N EAC
~ '~ S W TYPE OF BUILDING
~ES. ~_/~ SEAS. VL FARM CON~M. CB. MISC. Mkt. Volue
,
1
LAND IMP. TOTAL ,I DATE ',. REMARKS
......
tillable I ,
tillable 2
-ill.hie 3
V~dl~nd
;wampland FRONTAGE ON WATER
lrushland ~O FRONTAGE ON ROAD
~ouse Plot ' DEPTH
~ ~ BULKH~D
'ot~l DOCK
NEW YORK STATE DEPART~NT OF ENVIEO[~ENTAL CONSEEVATION
A review has bean made of your proposal to:
York State Department of Environmental Conservation ham found the
_~_ parcel____ project to be:
~ Greater than 300' from inventoried tidal wetlands.
Laudward of a substantial man-made structure
greater than 100' in length constructed prior to September 20, 1937.
Landward of 10' contour elevation above mean sea level on a gradual, nat-
ural slope.
.. Landward of topographical crest of bluff, cliff or dune in excess of 10
feet in elevation above mean sea level.
Therefore, no permit under Article 25 (Tidal WelL%nde of the Environmental
Conservation Law) is required at this time since the current proposal is beyond
State mandated JUrisdiction pursuant to this act, However~ any additional work
or medlficationa to the project ~k~y require a permit. It ts your responsibility
to notify this office~ in writing, if ~uch additional work of modifications are
contemplated.
Very truly yours,i
Regional Supervisor of
R~gulatory Affairs
~JL:RNT:cz
Fee: $
Office Notes:
SCTM1000Section~ Block 3 Lot(s) /4- Lot Size /~t/ I/~ ~t~ Zone
I (WE) APPEAL TI:[E WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
22 - BASED ON MAP DATED 3'-5-- ag'
Applicant(s)/Owner(s):
MailingAddress: ~O~''
Telephone: Fax #: Email:
NOTE: In addition to the above, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract
vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents:
NameofRepresentative:P¢C~,,C t~rn,,> ~-ff/d~:(e~Owner, or ( )Other:
Agent's Address: ~'¢~Z'- ]'~,~ /t~)~,~.~ ) ~m'~.~C~9..~,,~
Telephone '7.~ - ~3~f/ Fax #: ~ 4-.~ ~ ~'~ Email:
Please check box to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names:
[] Applicant/Owner(s), or ~Authorized Representative, or [] Other Name/Address below:
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED MAP DATED ~.ff- ~o~ . and DENIED
AN APPLICATION DATED ~'-/t ~_ O~O FOR:
~ J~Buflding Permit
~Certificate of Occupancy [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy
D Change of Use
}(Permit for As-Built Construction
[]Other:
Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning
Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.)
Article~'X! ]] Section 280- ] ~2 Subsection
Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for:
~.A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map.
[] A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A.
[] Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section
[] Reversal or Other
A prior appeal~has, [] has not been made at any time with respect to this propertv~ UNDER Appeal
No. Year__. (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for
assistance.)
REASONS FOR APPEAL (additional sheets tnav be used with preparer's signature):
AREA VARIANCE REASONS: __ ~.~_._~_.~O_ O~E~Ls
(1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a
detriment to nearby properties if granted, because:
(2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the
applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because:
(3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because:
(4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions
in the neighborhood or district because:
(5) Has the alleged difficulty been serf-created? ( )Yes, or ( )No.
Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: ~No. [3 Yes (~lease furnish covvL
This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the
character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and weffare of the community.
Check this box ( ) IF .4 USE VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED, AN~D PLE.4SE COMPLETE THE
.4TT.4CHED USE VARI.4NCE SHEET: (Please besu~~,~
(Agent must~S~bmit wTiUen A~tho~l~a~ion from Owner)
Sworn to~xbefore me this
da~ of ~_~Z200~.
NOT~W PUILIC.ITATE O~ NEW ¥OIIl
PECONIC PERMIT EXPEDIT
Building / DEC / Variance / Marine
32645 Main Road · Cutch~
E-Mail peconicpermilsra)~optonline.net Ph 631.734.8361
~ue, NY 11935 ~v
September 8, 2008
Board of Appeals
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
RE: Questions on Application
Due to the uniqueness of this application, I will be addressing these questions to each of the four
variance requests being made.
An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a
detriment to nearby properties if granted, because;
a) Pergola: Granting relief for a pergola will not produce a change in the character of the
neighborhood as it is being proposed to cover an existing permitted deck. The scale and
openness of the proposed pergola will only enhance both this property and the entire
neighborhood.
b) Proposed Fence: The proposed fence will be behind the setbacks granted in the previous
variance, but will also be behind proposed plantings such as what exists currently. The
existing plantings completely surround the subject property, and provide privacy, except in
the winter months, and it also allows the deer to gain access to the pool area. My clients
have spent large sums of money to landscape their pool area, only to have it destroyed by
deer that can get over the fence. We feel that a privacy fence, 6 feet high will not provide
any change to the character of the neighborhood, as during most of the year it will not be
seen from the road.
c) Existing In-Ground Pool: The pool will cause no change in the neighborhood, as it was
granted variance relief previously, and the only reason that we are here with this part of the
application is that the pool was placed in a slightly different location than what was
previously approved. This structure will cause no change to the character of the
neighborhood.
d) Existing Car Port: This structure, although not permitted, has been on this house for a
number of years with no complaints from the neighbors. It is a minor structure, and due to
the landscaping, is not easily seen from the road. This structure will not cause an undesirable
change to the character of the neighborhood.
2.
PI:CONIC PI=RMIT I=XPI:DITING
~u~ld,ng / DEC / Variance / Marine
The benefit sought by the applicant C~4NNOT be achieved by some m
applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because;
RECE)VED ]
a) Pergola: Due to the shape, size, and location of the subject property and house, any
addition or alteration to the house will increase the degree of non-conformity of the
structure. We were aware of this when we designed the proposed pergola, and in such
propose that it sits atop a previously approved deck. We feel that this is a minor change to
the non-conformity.
b) Fence: Due to the shape, size, and location of the property, any proposed structure would
have to be granted variance relief.
c) Existing In-Ground Pool: Due to the location of the existing pool, located in two front
yards, any proposal for this structure would need variance relief.
d) Existing Car-Port: Due to the fact that this existing structure is located in one of the two
front yards of this property, there is no way to legalize this structure without asking for
variance relief.
The amount of relief requested is not substantial because;
e) Pergola: The amount of relief that we are requesting for the proposed pergola is for volume
only, not setbacks or lot coverage. By siting the proposed pergola over an existing permitted
deck, we are able to minimize the relief required.
f) Fence: The relief needed for the fence is again minimal as we are asking for a change from a
chain link fence to a privacy fence. The existing fence is already in it's location, but is not
high enough for the owners of the property to realize their full enjoyment of their pool and
yard.
g) Existing In-Ground Pool: The amount of relief is minor as the pool was already granted
relief previously, and the only issue is that it was built approx two feet over from where the
relief was granted.
h) Existing Car-Port: This structure is on the side of the house, which happens to sit on one of
the two front yards, and one rear yard (no side yards on this property). The carport is a
primarily open structure, and cannot be readily converted to living space.
The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental
conditions in the neighborhood or the district because;
a) Pergola: The proposed pergola will have no adverse effect as it is proposed to be sited atop
an existing permitted deck.
b) Fence: The fence will not have any adverse impact, as there is already a fence in the
approximately the same location, and one is required by NYS code for the pool.
c) Existing In-Ground Pool: The existing pool will have no adverse impact as this structure is
not living space, and is open to above.
d) Existing Car-Port: We feel that the existing carport will have no adverse impacts on the
neighborhood, or the environment, as again, it is an open structure with the minimal amount
of structure needed for it's stated purpose.
APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(For ZBA Reference)
Applicant: ~'~'~ ~'7//~ A,9 ~ /~5 ~o~/4~- Date Prepared:
I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas
Please describe areas being removed: /V/A
RECEIVED
2 7- b23
ZON)NG ~OARD OF APPEgL£'~
H. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions):
Dlmenstons of first floor extension: /tg~ r-~oJn~
Dimensions of new second floor: ~ A,'/~
Dimensions of floor above second level:
Height (from finished ground to top of ridge):
Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground)
measured fi-om natural existing grade to first floor:
III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes)
(aUach extra sheet if necessary) - Please describe building areas:
Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations:
Number of Floors and Chan~es WITH Alterations:
iV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor):
Existing square footage of buildings on your property:
Proposed increase of building coverage: t9 ~o
Square footage of your lot: /4,, I / ,,o
Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area:
V. Purpose of New Construction:
VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land
and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting tile code requirement(s):
Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners
for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view.
7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007
QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR FHJNG WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION
A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale?
[] Yes
Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours?
~No [] Yes, please explain on attached sheet.
1) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? t/l/d9
2) Are these areas shown on the map submitted with this apphcation? fi//tg]
3) Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area?
4) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the
Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? /V/~1 Please confirm status of your
inquiry or application with the Trustees:
and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved map.
D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five
feet above mean sea level? /~b/~
E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown
on the survey map that you are submitting? /~/p (Please show area of these
structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state "none" on the above line, if applicable.)
F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? /~/p
If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building
Department and describe:
G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? /f/tO If yes, please label
the proximity of your lands on your map with this application.
H. Please list present use or operations conducted at th_is parcel tl~ ~ t ~9/4'~ or,~
and proposed use [~l~ff/~t~o t'~
(ex~istin_g: s~j~-family; proposed: same with garage or pool, or other description.)
To{vn of Sou th old
A. INSTRUCTIONS
1.
LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FOllY ~--~E~VE ~ i
All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies glt~C%~?e0sE~& for
proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This
assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in
making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exem]~t actions including Building Permits
and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.
Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt
minor action hst, policies and ~xplanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local
Waterfi'ont Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant
beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town).
If'any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the
achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law.
Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified pr/or to making a
determination that it is consistent to the maxknum extent practicable with the LWRP policy
standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LTM policy
standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken.
A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website
(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local
libraries and the Town Clerk's office.
B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION
SCTM# ~ ~ ]~---
The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response):
TownBoard [--] Planning Board ~] Building Dept. ~ Board ofTrustees [-~
1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response):
(a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital
construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction)
(b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy)
(c~ermit, approval, license, certifi~hTi~r~i
Nature and extent of action: ....
Location of action:
Site acreage:
Present zoning classification: ~9_ Z~t~
If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following
information shall be provided:
(a) Name of applicant:
(b) Mailing address: ~",/.5~
/t/.e.,. ?o,-k /
(c) Telephone number: Area Code ( )_
(d) Application number, if any:_
Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency?
Yes [] No,[~ If yes, which state or federal agency?
C. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,
preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use Of a coastal location, and
minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
[--]Yes V--] NoJ~Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
.... Pohcy'~y~:Pr~le~t and~r-~-~-rvelii~l~?i-c--h~d~r~laheo o[~glc~l resources'o~fThe oT-6~Xdouthold. See LWRP
Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
~ Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 3.
LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria
Yes ~-~ No ~ Not Applicable
Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of South01d. See
Attach additional sheets if necessary
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP
Section III -Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria
[--'] Yes ~] No [~[ Not Applicable /i
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section llI
-Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including
Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policiesl_Pages 22
through 32 for evaluation criteria.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See
Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes [~ No ~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous
substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria.
yes ?3 No Not Applicable
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public
resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation
criteria.
Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable
A~ach additional sheets if necessary
WORKING COAST POLICIES
Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in
suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria.
- ~-7]-ye~ ~]- No - Nq~ b t -3~-~lii-aq[ii~ .
· ?
Attach additional sheets if necessary ] ~' [
Pohcy 11. Promote sustainable use of living mar,ne resources in Long IslJnd S&a~°, t~e~l~eeconiciEstuarv
and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 throngh 62 [ '~
Yes ~-] No ~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town' of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62
through 65 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes ~] No .~. Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP
Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes ['~ No .~. Not Applicable
Created on 5/25/0.$1t.'20 AM
L
7.
State Environmental Quality Review
~HORT E1VVIRONMENT~ ASSESSMENT FORM
For U1VZISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I - Project ]~ormation (To be complete by Applicaat or Project spewer)
1. Applicant / Sponsor 2. Project Name
3. Project location: Municipality Counb/
4. Precise location (Street address and road intersec~ions, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map)
5. Is proposed action:
I( ) NEW (.~ EXPANSION ,(,~MODIFICATION / ALTERATION
6, Desedbe project briefly:
7. Amount of land affected:
8. Will proposed action comply with ex~sting or other e.,dsting land use restdc0ons:( ) YES ~ NO tf No, descdbe bdef]y:
9. What is present land use in vicinity of project: (describe):
~Residential ~ ( )lndusthal ( ) Commercial ( ) Agricultural ( ) Park/Forest/Open Space ( ) Other
10. Does action Involve a permit approval or f~nding, now or ultimately from any other Governmental agency,(Federal, State or Local) ?
( ) YES IX~ NO If Yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals:
11. Does any aspect of the action have a currently vatid permit or approval?
( ) YES (/~,NO If Yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals:
12. As a result of proposed action, will ex~sttng permit/approval require modlfica[Ion?
J( ) YES ~) NO If Yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals:
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my kn, owledge
If the ack. in the Coast~i~e~a~ou~re a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
APP .... ~RANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE
Ta hn~ f °,~.°.f_S°ut~h°ld's C°de °_f Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on t~ ~nJ _~. ~ ~ "~'~'~ /
,.ossi~,~.y[55~.. lr~e. p, urpo~e o,I ~is fo. rm is to provide information, whic'~cVa miowa omc~rsc /
ake wha ..... ,~uuun ,s necessary t0...~__~.~_~_~aea ~r
(Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of Someone else or
other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.)
NATIfRE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.)
Variance
Special Exception -- ---
*Other
Approval or Exemption --'
from plat or official map
Change of Zone --
Tax Gr/evance
If Other name the act~wty:
Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have
relationship with any officer or employee,~f the Town of S.o,,uthold9 "Relationship" includes b~
blood man-ia e o~ business interest. Business interest" m~ans a business including
~h th~' -- ~ '' -- .
~, in which the Town Officer or emp~loyee has even a~l owners~
~¥) a co~[poration in~hich the~own officer O~or7 than 5% of the
YES __ NO _~
If you answered "YI~X'; complete the balance of this form and date and sign mhere indicated
Name of person employed by the Town of Southold:
Title or position of that person:
Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant, agent or contract vendee) and the
Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or
describe the relationship in the space provided.
The Town officer or employee or his or her. spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that
apply):
A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock
of the applicant (when .the applicant is a corporatitn);
B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity
(when the applicant is not a corporation);
~ C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or
D) the actual applicant.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP
Submitte,d.~~ t~9,~
Signamre:~__~_____~~ ~-
Print Nam .~ ~ ~~
?ECONIC FERMIT EXFEDIT
Btllldlrl~ / DISC / Variance / Mar,ne
32645 Main Road · Cutcb
E-Mail peconicpermits~t}optonline.nct Ph 631.734.8361 · F
N RECEIVED
u¢, NY 11935 ~ ~'
631.734.227~y:~ ~-~
August 19, 2008
Board of Appeals
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
RE: ZBA Authorization Letter
To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to authorize employees of"Peconic Permit Expediting Inc.' to act as my agent in
obtaining a variance/appeal from the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at any time.
Respectfully yours,
Jacquie Moskowitz & Ekmel Kasaba - Homeowner
80 Lakeside Dr.
~-IOi~.S HIE, GINS (~i)
i#3255
Construct deck addition to ~wellin~
with reductionof frontyard setback from Cedar
P~int Dr.E.
FILED: 6/1/8~
ACTION D ·
A~E. 8/1#/8#
Southold Town Board of Appeals
IVIAIN I~rlAD- ~TATE ~rtAD 25 5mUTH~LD, L.I.. N,Y. 11971
TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No. 3288
Application ~ated June 1, 1984 (Public Hearing July 26, 1984) ~' '~
TO: Mr. Thomas Higg]ns [Appellant(s)]
48 Kenwood Road
Garden City, NY 11530,
At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on August 14~ 1984,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[ ] Request fom Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[XI Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordin~ce
Article III , Section 100-31
[ ] Request for
Upon application of THOMAS HIGGINS, 48 Kenwood Road, Garden City,
NY l153G, for a Variance to the Zoning Drdinance, Article III, Section
lO0-31 for permission to construc: deck addition to dwelling with reduc-
tion of frontyard setback from Cedar Point Drive East. Identification
of Property: 80 Lakeside Drive (a/k/a 675 Cedar Poin: Drive East),
Southold; Cedar Beach Park Subdivision Lot No. 81; County Tax Map
Parcel No. 1000-90-03-D.14.
The board made the following findings and determination:
By this appeal, applicant seeks a Variance to Article
Section lO0-31, Bulk Schedule of the Zoning Code, for permission
to construct walkway deck five feet in width, reducing the frontyaro
setback of Lhe new dwelling structure to 26 feet. The existing
frontyard setback is shown to be 31 feet from Cedar Point Drive East
on the copy of the survey submitted with this application. The walk-
way will lead to the proposes side de6k addition which is ~hown
be set back ll feet from the side prdpe~.ty..ltne ~which ~s permitted
under the current sideyard requirements<~f the'Code).. Fo~ t'~~'~-
record it is noted that this new one-family dwelling h~s been
authorized by Building Permit ~12585Z issued August 27, 1983.
The ~emise~){n~:~estio~'contains an area of approximately
13~400 sq. ft. w~h~183~.34' frontage aloqg Cedar Point Drive East
and 184.18±' frontage a~ong Lakeside Drive. 'The parcel is of a
"triangular" nature with most of the open yard area technically
"frontyards~' The existing dwelling structure is set back 35'
from Lakesid~ ~Drlv~, 31~ fro~ Qedar Point 'Drive East, and ll'3"
from the easterly side. property line. The parcel in question ts
known as referred to as Lot 81 of the Subdivision of Cedar Beach
Park, Ma~ No, go, Of D~ember 20, 1927.
The board members nave visited the site in question and are
familiar with the neighborhood. Although this parcel is ~f a shape
that frequently requires variances, the hardship does appear
self-imposed ~nd ~he "significant injury" burden has not been
shown. The applicant'has requested a five-foot walkway, and it is
the board's opinion that a three-foot reouction for that purpose,
leaving a 28' frontyard setback, would suffice.
Now, therefore, on mo:ion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr.
Sawicki, it was
DATED: September ..7, ] 984. C~AIRMAN, SOUTEOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD
Foz~a ZB4 (rev. 12/81) i~ ~ .....
Page 2- Appeal No. 3255
Matter of THOMAS HIGGINS
Decision Rendered August 14, 1984
RESOLVED, that Appeal No. 3255, application of THOMAS ~IGGINS,
for a reduction~of frontyard area for a walkway/deck as noted below,
BE'AND IS HEREBY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS:
l~ The walkway/deck shall not exceed three-feet in width,
leaving no~ less than a 28' frontyard setback from Cedar Point
Drive East, and
2, That the walkway/deck never' be roofed or enclosed.
.... Locatlon of Property: Lot 811, "Cedar Beach Par~' Map No. 90,
~ Lakeside Dri've {a/k/a 675 Cedar Point Drive East), Southold, NY;
County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-90-D3-014.
Vote of'the Board; Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen,
G~igoni~, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was adopted by
unanimous vote of ali the members.
September 7, 1984
GG:I k
'~ ~ma tt~ ~ess~,lity exists .~ t~
~' ~ ~ ~1 ~s /e~.lcr~~'.
STAT£MEN
THE WATER S~PPLY.
CONFORM TO THE
SUFFOLK CO EPT.
AFFtlC~NT
SUFFOLK COUNTy
SERVICES -- FOF
CONSTRUCTION ONL
DATE: , ~j
N. S. REF. NO.:
APPROVED: __~
SUFFOLK CO, TAX
DIST. [OOO SECT.O
OWNERS ADDRESS.'
TEST HOLE
...... _j.+'/; ._
Gera~d P. C-oe~inger,
O~r~s Grlgon~, Jr.
Joselgt H. SawickJ
James Diniz~o,
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
(516)
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF A~PEALS
Appl. No. 3950
Matter of JACQUE KASABA. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III A, Section 100-30 A.4 (100-33), Article III A,
Section 100-30 A.3, Article XXI~, Section 100-244, as
disapproved, for permission to construct a deck addition to
dwelling and accessory pool. Proposed accessory structure not
permitted in the front yard area and proposed Oonstruction will
exceed permitted lot coverage. Property location: 80 Lakeside
Drive & 675 Cedar Point Drive, Southold, County Tax Map No.
1000, Section 90, Block 3, Lot 14.
WHEREAS, a p~blic hearing was held and concluded on June
27, 1990 in the matter of the Application of JACQUR KASABA under
Appeal No. 3950; and
WHEP~AS, at said hearin9 all those who desired to be heard
were heard and their testimony recorded; and
W~EP~EAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact:
1. The premises in question is located along the north
side of Cedar Point Drive, Town of Southold, and is identified
on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 90,
Block 3, Lot 14.
2. This is an application for Variances from the Zoning
Code Article III A, Section 100-30 A.4 [100-33), Article III A
Section 100-30 A.3. Article XXIV, Section 100-244, for
permission to construct deck addition to dwelling and accessory
pool. Proposed accessory structure not permitted in the front
yard area and proposed constr~etion exceeds permitted lot
coverage.
Page 3 - Appl. No. 3950
Matter of JACQUE KASABA
Decision rendered July 11, 1990
RESOL%~J3, to GRANT a Variance in the matter of the
application of JACQUE KASABA as applied under Appeal NO. 3950,
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. That the pool not be placed any closer than 11 ft.
including deck from Lakeside Drive and 22 ft. from Cedar Point
Drive.
2. That the fence and any screening not exceed 4 ft. 6
in. in height in front yard areas above grade, the area
beginning at a point of' 30 ft. from the corner of Cedar point to
30 ft. from the corner of Lake Side Drive remain open and
unvegitated.
3. That the 10 ft. by 3 ft. deck be located as shown on
the site plan dated May 1, 1990 by Briarcliff Landscape Inc.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehrigner, Grigonis,
Doyen and Dinizio. This resolution was duly adopted.
df
RECEIVED AND ~LED BY
THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
GERARD p. GOE~RIN~~
Page 4 - Notice of Hearings
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting of June 27, 1990
i 8:05 p.m. Appl. NO. 3950 JACQUE KASABA. Variance to the~
ning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.4 (100-33),
ticle III A, Section 100-30A.3, Article lO(IV, Section 100-244,
s disapproved, for permission to construct a deck addition to
elling and accessory pool. Proposed accessory structure not
ermitted in the front yard area and proposed construction will
ceed permitted lot coverage. ProPerty Location: 80 Lakeside
~rive & 675 Cedar Point Drive, Southold, County Tax Map No.
1000, Section 90, Block 3, Lot 14.
8:10 p.m. Appl. No. 3953 - PETER & C~{ERYL INZEltILLO.
Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30
A.3, Bulk, Area and Parking Regulations, as disapproved, for
permission to constr~ct a deck addition to existing one fa/~ily
dwelling. Proposed construction will have insufficient side
yard setbacks and excessive lot coverage. Property Location:
505 7th Street, Greenport, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 48,
Block 01, Lot 17.
8:15 p.m. Appl. No. 3831 - P~LpH & pATRICIA PUGLIESB.
Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section
100-30B (14), for a Winery for the Production, Storage and the
ELIZABETH A. NEVHJ.E, RMC, CMC
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (631) 765-6145
Telephone (631) 765-1800
southoldtown.northfork.net
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO:
FROM:
DATED:
RE:
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
Elizabeth A. Neville
October 21, 2008
Zoning Appeal No. 6238
Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 6238 of Peconic Permit Expediting for
Jacqueline Moskowitz- the Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Also
enclosed is a Letter (2 Pages) for Peconic Permit Expediting Explaining Relief Sort from ZBZ,
Applicant's Project Description, Questionnaire, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Short
Environmental Assessment Form, Transactional Disclosure Form, Authorization Letter from
Jacquie Moskowitz & Ekmel Kasaba to Peconic Permit Expediting to Represent them in the
Matter, 1 Page of Photos of Existing Car Port & Proposed Locations of Changes, Notice of
Disapproval from Building Department Dated August 22, 2008, Copy of Survey Showing
Existing Construction Dated August 5, 2008 Prepared by John C. Ehlers Land Surveyor, Plans
for Pergola Including Plot Plan & Elevations Dated Sept 4, 2008 Prepared by Boulevard
Planning P.C.
ZBA TO TOWN CLERK TRANSMITTAL SHEET
(Filing of Application and Check for Processing)
DATE: 10-20-08
ZBA # NAME OF APPLICANT CHECK # AMOUNT TC DATE STAMP
#6238 Moskowitz, J. #1139 $600.00 OCT 2 I 2008
~ou thold Town Clerk
TOTAL $600.00
Sent via Inter-Office to Town Clerk by: __
Thank you.
PMK
OTown Of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Date: 10/21/08
* * * RECEIPT * * *
Receipt~: 29926
Transaction(s):
1 1
Application Fees
Reference Subtotal
6238 $600.00
Check#: 1139
Total Paid: $600.00
Name:
Peconic, Permits Expediting Inc
32645 Main Rd
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Clerk ID: CAROLH Internal ID: 6238
Office Location:
Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 1197l
Mailing Address:
53095 Main Road
EO. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
http://southoldtown.north fork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064
October 23, 2008
Mr. Thomas Isles, Director
Suffolk County Department of Planning
P.O. Box 6100
Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099
Dear Mr. Isles:
Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review
pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code:
ZBA File # 6238
Applicant's Request:
Within 500 feet of:
Owner/Applicant: Moskowitz, Jacqueline
Setbacks & Fence Height
( x ) State or County Road
( ) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary)
( ) Boundary of existing/proposed County, State, Federal land
( ) Village, Town or County Line.
If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Encls.
Gerard P. Goehringer
ZBA Chairman
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
STEVE LEVY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
December 5, 2008
RECEIVED
DEC 1 1 2008
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
THOMAS ISLES, AICP
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
Town of Southold ZBA
53085 Main Rd., P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Att: Mr. Gerry Goehringer, Chair
Dear Mr. Goehringer:
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the
following applications submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission are considered to be a matter for
local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision
of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval.
Applicants
Municipal File Numbers
Hughes, Michael & Therese*
Moskowitz, Jacqueline
Kaufer, Phyllis
Bergamini, Robert & Margaret
R & B Anello
Faga, Kevin & Jeanine
Wood, Timothy
Cardinale Jr., Alan & Jeanne
Hobbs, Diane & Henry
Topper, Lewis
6236
6238
6240
6241
6242
6243
6244
6246
6247
6248
*The requested variance appears to be an unwarranted over-intensification of use and the Board should
proceed with caution so as not to establish a precedent that could undermine the Town's Zoning Code.
TRK:ds
Very truly yours,
Thomas Isles, AICP
Director of Planning
Theodore R. Klein
Senior Planner
LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS
H. LEE DENNISON BLDG.- 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5191
100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788421099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044
Office Location:
Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 11971
Mailing Address:
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
http://southoldtown.north fork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064
LEGAL NOTICE
SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
THURSDAY, JANUARY 8, 2009
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town
Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be
held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095
Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY,
JANUARY 87 2009:
11:00 A.M. JACQUELINE MOSKOWITZ #6238. Location of Property: 80
Lakeside Drive and Cedar Point Drive, Southold; CTM 1000-90-3-14. Request
for Variances on this 14,118 square foot lot, under Zoning Code Sections 280-
122 and 280-124, based on applications for building permits and the Building
Inspector's August 22, 2008 Notice of Disapproval concerning a pergola, fence
height, swimming pool, and as-built carport structure, for the reasons that:
(1) the proposed pergola to be added to the dwelling structure is not permitted
because such additions/alteration will constitute an increase in the degree of
nonconformance (nonconforming rear yard setback and front yard setback,
see ZBA #3255 of August 14, 1984;
(2) the fence is not allowed as per Conditions under ZBA #3950 dated July 11,
1990 which states: "the fence and any screening shall not exceed 4 ft. 6 in. in
height in front yard areas above grade, the area beginning at a point of 30 feet
from the corner of Cedar Point Drive to 30 feet from the corner of Lakeside
Drive shall remain open and un-vegetated;
(3) the existing swimming pool under Building Permit #19275 issued July 27,
1990 is located at less than the required minimum of 22 feet under ZBA # 3950
dated July 11, 1990;
Page 2 - Legal Notice
January 8, 2009 Public Hearing
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
(4) the existing carport shows setbacks from each the front yard and rear yard
at less than the code-required minimum of 35 feet.
The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be
heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the
conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated
above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the
day of the hearing. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office
at (631) 765-1809, or by email: Linda. Kowalski@Town.Southold.ny.us.
Dated: December 9, 2008.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
BY LINDA KOWALSKI
54375 Main Road (Office Location)
53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS)
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
#9137
STATE OF NEW YORK)
) SS:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
Sworn to before me this
Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is
Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at
Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that
the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in
said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successively, commencing on the
18th day of December, 2008. --
~ /~ z ~ ~,z~-~
Principal Clerk
] Cday of _~-~ ' 2008.
NOTARY PUBLIC.STA¥~ OF NEW YORK
NO 01-VO6105050
~u~..~a aR '~u~tolk County
Notice of I
proposed second-story addition,and al-
terations 16 th~ e~isting dwelling, w[~a
setback of less than the code-required.
ft, minimum sthgle s!de setback, aq4,1ds.s
than 35 ft. mininium rear yard setback,
at 645 Jackson Street. New Suffolk:
1000-117-9-5.2. '
):40 A.M.ANTHONY-and BARBA-
RA BONAGURA #6081. REquest tot a
Special Excepnoa under Zoning Code
S~ctinn 280-13B'for approval of an
built Accessory Apartment with owner-
occupancy In a s~lg-~giiJy dkvel~xg ~r
Holbrook' Eane: Matutucl~:
9:55A.M. Mi HA LK. andTi~ R-
ESE HUGHES g6236. Request for Var
ances hnder Sections. }804 and
based upBn afl application~fldr abh'~ ai}lg
permit and thE:l~ildihg I~spe&or's Sep-
tember 22, 2008 Notic~ Of Disapproval
not permitte0 for two reasons: (1) ~t con-
10:10 A.M. ~
t B E."F : -F#6228. Re.
quest for a:Variance undur Section 280-
18, h~d 6n the api~licant's request for a
dot-fine change and the Building Inspec
tor's Notice of DiSapproval coIlcerning a
proposed lot ared for 1(100~-8-~2.4 at
225 Marion Lane, which lot ~ill become
less conforming by reducing its s~ze from
~ 34,i94 square fe~t 16 30 ~448 square 'f&et
in tots s ~:e. and concerning 1000-3f-
8-13 at 730 Bay Avenue, East Marion.
which lot will vecome more conforming
by increas ng its s~ze from 8,340 square
feet to 12.~86 square feet.
10:30 A M. R~RT BERGAMINI
# 6241: Request for Variances under See-
fion 280-124,,based on th. Building In-
spector's October 17,2008 Notice of Dis-
approva coacernmg a proposed deck
addition at less than the code-reqmred
rain mum front yard setback of 35 feel
124, bas~kl on th~' ~i[~l~,~ ?~spe~t~igs
May 12,2008 No tic¢'8 f ~D~jsti'p~f~v~ ~on.
ceming'a prop~sed'ii~x0fd~ehiii~ ~{flz a
Broadwaters Road,'Ct~tch0~ue; CTM
the bank 6r bluff o~;a lot ~djafient to the
and lot.coverage exceedh~g the c~de reel. at 1690 The Strand. East Marion:
limitation ~ 2.0% on this non~con~orm CTM 3Q.2~61
ing +l. .31/a~otcat 405O Camp Min~_. -;~ ~.:5~: ~M, ~ORGE :YATR~;CI~
ola'{Rohd~ ~;la~ti/tlek;:CTM 123-5-20: #6237. P~u~st for Vaiianceg·un~ Se~
10:45 A.M. ~NALD ZITO #6233. lions 280-15C and 280-116A(] i based
Request for a xAd[iance under Cectinn
280q24, based on the Building ]nspec-
toffs August 25. 2008 Notice of Disap-
proval concermng an as-built outdoor
shower addition to the smgle-falniiy
dwe0mg which zs less than 10 fee on a
single side yard, less th~n 15 f~et ~)n the
opposite side yard. resulting irt less than
25 feet for a total of both side yards, al
1185 Bungalow Lane, Mattituck; CTM
123-3-16. '
'ii'!00 '. ,&~.,. ~
~#~23'8 'Location o f Prop-
ertyi'80 ~e$ide~Driv~ and Cedar ?~int
Drive, Southold;'CTM 1000-90-~344, Re-
quest for Varia~ices on/his i4 118 square
foot lot, undez Zoning Cod~ Sections
280-122 and 280-124, based on applica-
nons tot building pemnts and the Build-
lng Inspector's August 72, 2008 Notic~ )t
on the Building Inspector's Octol~r 8.
2008 Notice of Disapproval concerning
a proposed dwelling, swimming pool,
trellis and accesso~ garage. The rea-
sons stated for disapprowng the building
permit application are: ( ) the proposed
tb~fition~Of th~.trefiis to be added to hc
house; a~d accessory swirl,ming pool, am
not penmtted at less than 100 feet from
the top of the bluff 0r ban~ on Io s auja
cent lethe L.L Souhd (~ the ~ground
swimming pool is a so prolapsed n a s dc
front yai'd in t15.~ case o~ waterfroni
lot, or codeCpermit te'd'r ~a~ ~hrd ~'0)llew
eonstrucfim~ is pfopSsed at less ~tl~i.~he
code-required minimum ~f 15 feet an a
single side yard, Location of Property
18805 Soundview Avenue Southold.
2:10 P.M HFN_RY TRAFNDI.'t uno
caIl~ii el Dp petty: South SIdP of Mum
Road (NYS Route 25 East Marion
under &./title IL Sectnms i00 25 ar
100-26 rcnmnbcred 280 9 aim 280 lC -
Numbers 12 and Il,in District 10~ Sec
hen 3l Block J4 whica slates:
in comtnon ownersinp with the first
~ foi';kCTM; Pa/eel
~sn' the
d~elli~g,}which .Building !nspec:to?!s J~nuarY30¢,2008
6~ less 'than the NOtice of Disappro,~al:ame0aded July 25,
2008 Concerning a proposed sing!e4ami-
a ~ear ' ydWe ng (after 'd~molition 0~ an exist-
{h& i.~a~im~aXimuin J~i[ati0n. Of 20% jng building) with a proP0sgd si~g!e side
/Of &J;)~rfi~; M i605'Old'S[ii~>yaid Lane; yard at less fh~ff ti/e7 ~de required~rnini
S0uth6 d; ~M 64.~2301 ' rmim of 10 feet iess:{han .thefreg~uir~d
100 emi :tNO'RI~W ana;ELIZA- c;mbinea Side yaids 0f-¢~ ~ee; a~d:less
: ~~2~ ::g.e qU~S;{~0r tli~t~ 35:feei!from tfi~ frght yard !0t lNe.
,;,V~cds~lmd%?~Go'd¢:S/~dtinns¢280WZ at'13000 Main~R0ad¢~astMariog;CTM
ahd '2B?{3 G.2. a;; based On-~h~ Building 31-14dl.
lfisp~dfi~l:dJuue 30,~2~ ~0tic~ bf Dis- TheJB0ard 0f Appeals will hear :ail
approgg!,doa~ernJng al. rapplidati0n for a persons, Or thekr repre.sentatigek% desir7
bllildin~ permR ~0 alter thc u~¢ el au a~~ · tag t0']be l~ard az each hearing, an,or
· cess0ry:building (second floe?) from an desiring to ~ubmit written stateq:ents
accessory use as a garage to the 9wner's before the conclusion Of aach ~earing~
,h0int~ oitupati0n~offieeiwith fail'bath- Each h~armg'~ili hot s~firt 6arlidr than
toe, after rera0¥afof the;a~kbfiilt kit~h; designai~d ab0veiFiles are availhbl; for
eft ~fid cooking areas, instead Df a home fdvieW dnr rig regu[ai l~usin~ss hours
office carried on in the main building and:,0m~aatl~dg~0f~hehdaring)lfyou
Sworn to before me this
dwelling which is less l~han lOkfeet on ~ permit application ar ·
single side yard, ess than t5 ft~ei ~)~ ..... . ~; e. (1 the proposed
oppomte side yard; resultin i~ie~ ~a , ~; ~ [~ ~e add~ t0 ~e
25 feet for a total of both ~ide ares ~ house, ant acc~sory sw,n~ ng po01 a~
Y , not permitted at less than I00 feet ~om
Notice 0 ..... J~ B~ng~o~ Lane, Mattituck ~ the top bf the b/afl:0r bank n d
proposed s~9~i0~y-~d~ti0n arid a~, : li'~B0: ~M t~C~ ~ ce~/to the C:l: S0u~d; (2)'the in~o~d
teratinns to the exist~g dWeliln~, Wi~:a MO S~;~ :~ Swimming pool is ~so ~roA~ed i~
35 ft. mm~um.rear ym-d se ba~k quest f0rVari~c~ on~ i~4;'7 ~ - , o .~ permiRe~ red, kd
,at ~ Jackson ~trenl,New Suff0~;,C~ foot lot;: ~der zbn~ ~xh22 o ~. ~n !S propgsed at les~ ~ah.the
10~A17-9:5 2 ~ ': 280-122 ~_h ;3~,~: ¢~,~9~ 57e9 ~ns c~de-Eequ red m~im~m o~ 15 fee on a
· ,ua ~ou-~z% oaseo on apphca- smgle side yard. Location of Property:
9:40 A.M.~NTH0~a~d BARBA. tions for building permits and the Build 18805 Sound~eW ~venue, Southold;
RA BONAGUR~ ¢608i~ Rffqu8si:for a lng lnspector,s August 29 2008 Notice of
spegial E~ceptiofi und~r:~n~g Code: Disapproval concerninga pergo a. fence
SEction 280-13B for appr0~a] 0f an as: height, swimming pool and as built car BARBARA C'ADWALLA~. Lo
NOTARY PUBLIC-irA'(Ri OF NI~W YORK
Ne. 01-VO6105050
~i ,'i~a ~ ~oik County
~y C~m~*l~ ;~t~Y 28, 2012
~0:~0 A:~ ~ i¢5
~e~°nf°r~gbyreflucmgitss=eRom; roof in~th~ '-'
..... q.. e~ o_0,~ squareye~t 7 Broadwaters ~a
to*l s~ze, ~a concerning 1000-3f: 104-9q2
b7 ~¢a~ing its.me ~om 8,3~0 Square antes under section 280.116A{i)
f~t t0 12;086 Square fee ' on ~h~ Buiiding ~P;ct0v;~ S;pi;mber 2
10:30 A.M] ~ERGAMINI 2008 Notice 0f DiShppfo~a c6heemNg a
don ~0424;ibased 0n the BUd ng in- spa at !~S than 10Q,fe~t ~i0m the top of
~tor's Ociober 17,~008 N0tiCd df Dis- the bank'6r bluff 0ifa lot hdja~fntto
nla '~ad¢ Mat~tuek; ~ 123_5/20:. ; ~2~7: Reqd~s~~
ofcupanty in a ~gl~,£m iY d~veltjng~ai, (1) the proposed pergola to be ~ddcd
~n!~g~d: ~i~ ~6egi ;~di~i~m(~6 to dm dwelling structure is not permiltcd
H01bf06k'L~he,:Matti~ffck?~iqi§2 because such additions/alterat0m xxill
yard setback and bent Yard setback, see
ZBA #3255 of August Ih, I984;
(2) the feuce is not allowed :Is per
Condililms under ZBA #3950 dated July
11, 19~0 which states: the fence and an~
screemng shall not exceed 4 fl. 6 in. in
height in front yard areas above ~rade
CTM 51 1-14.
2:10 EM. HENRY 'I'RAENDLY and
Notice of Disappro~)ah amended July 25,
20(!8, the applicant has submitted at~pli
100 26 (renumbercd 280-9 and 280 I0)~
9:55A;M MI HA LK. andTHER-
ESE HUGHES #6236. Request for yari.
ances under S~cfi0ns~80,4 and
based up~/~ ~ appli~atiofi
permit and thd:B tilldihg l~speg~61'~ ~p_
tembel 22, 2008 Noticd.~f DisapprOVal
stating that the as:built mobile home is
not permitted for two reasons: (1) it corn
ttitutes a second dwelling uniti an~l~f
n contains less than 850 square feet of
living area. Location of Property: 9525
Main Road, Mattituck; CTM 200{)-122-
6-13.
,Building: InSpector's, January :30~,2008
:N0tiee of Disappro~al;:~mended Ju y 25,
n o 2008 concerning a proposed single:fami-
a;~ear exceeds ly d~eiling (after ~l~molitipn of in exist-
tire code maximum imitation Of 20% lug building) with a proposed single s dc
lot ~dver tinge~ ~t 1605:(51d S,hipy~rd Lane; yard at less tha~ tl/e ~;ci~ r~Uir~d ~nini`~
S0uthold; CTM 64;~230. ' mdm Of 10 feet less than.the~fequir~d
!:00:E~. AND'RF~W anal ELIZA- combhmd sgide yards of 25 feet and less
BETH GREEN~?#6~.5~ R~qt~Sf~f0r th~n 35 fee fr~m t[ie fr;fil yard 0(i ~e
: Vai'hZ~S iin'd~/~ ~6-d~ :S&ii$ns ~86 i2 at: 13000 Main,R0id, East Marinn;:CTM
and;Egq-~3gi2:a; based on'{he BUilding 31;1441.
Ins~efit~!s June 30,~2{~08~N0ticl bf Dis- T~e:B0ard of Appeals will h~ai all
approva! doaceming ~'i{~>pli~atibh f0r a p~rsons; or their representatNed,:aesir:
b~ding permit {0 alte} the use o~ an ac5 th~ to:b~ he~d at eacl~ hearing, and/or
cessory building (second dodO) fi.om an desiring tO submit wrfften siatem~nts
accessory use as a garage to the owner's before the conclusion Of each &earing.
h0~b oecupation'0ffice'~With fUil'bath- Each heafing v)iti;n0t start ~arlier than
r°6m. affer remdval of th~ a~ elint kitch: designated ~b0ve2 Files ~?e availhbi; fo~
en ~ind co6king areas, instead ~f a home review durifig regular;b~gmess hours
office carried on in the main building, and,p~sra,tth~d~0fiheh~aring Ify0u
The proppsed cl}ange in us~ fi'om garage have ,qgesti6as~ please do not hes ate
tea hom~ office is not penthtted under to ctJfitaci d)~:bffice at (631) 765;1809,
C,o. deStti0n280,13O2a;whichre4uires Or by email: Linda. K6,/~alski@Towni
a 'ho~e ~ccupafi0n!, t~ be incidental to Southold:ny.us. ). %~:. :i
the residential nsc of the premises an~l Datedi December 12, 2{)68,: ' ~
car~ie0:fMn t~e ~ain buii[lingl in addi- zoNING BOARD OF APPEALS
ti0n, ihe'Bhilding Inspector state~ that GERARD E GOEHRINGER.
the existing living space with kitcheh
(apartment),atbuilt is not permitted un:
der Section 280-12, since the Code limits
each lot t~ only one'dWelling. Location
of Propertyf306g3 C.R ~8 (a/k/a Middle
Road or North Road), Peconic; CTM
7345.
CHAIRMAN
BY LINDA KOWALSKI
54375 Main Road (Office Location)
53095 Main Road (MailingFOSPS)
Re. Box 1179
Southold; NY 11971-0959
9137-1T 12/18
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MAILING ADDRESS and PLACE OF HEARINGS: 53095 Main Road, Town Hall Building,
P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959
(631) 765-1809 Fax 765-9064
LOCATION OF ZBA OFFICE: Town Hall Annex at North Fork Bank Building, 1st Floor
54375 Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold
website: ~nortlffork. net
December 10, 2008
Re: Town Code Chapter 55 - Public Notices for Thursday, January 8, 2009 Hearing
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice
will be published in the next issue of the Times Review newspaper.
1) Before December 22nd
Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a Cover Letter including your telephone
number and a copy of your Survey or Site Plan (filed with this application) which shows the
new constrUction ;area or other request, by CERTIFIED MAIL,: RETURN RECEIPT
REQUESTED, to aI. JI owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed), vacant or
improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street.
Use the current ow~ner name and addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the
Town ASsessors' Office located at Southold Town Hall, or Real Property Office at the County
Center, Riverhead::r If you know of another address for a neighbor :you m~ay w~nt to send the
notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable, you are requested
to make other attempts to obtain a mailinq address or to deliver the letter to the current owneJ,
to the beSt of your ability, and to confirm how arran.qements were made in either a writte,
statement, or durin.q the hearin.q, providin.q the returned letter to us as soon as possible;
AND not later tha/l December 29th: Please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of
Mailin.q (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, names and addresses noted, and furnish it to
our office with the white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. When the green signature
cards are returned to you by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us before the
sCheduled hearing. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board during the
hearing and provide the card (when available). These will be kept in the permanent record as
proof of ali Notices.
2) Not Later December 29th: Please make arrangements to place the enclosed Poster on a
signboard such as ~:ardboard, plywood or other material, posting it at your property for seven
(7) days (or more) until the hearing is held. Securely place the sign on your property facing
the street, no moreithan 10 feet from the front property line bordering the street. If you border
more than one stre".et or roadway, an extra sign is available for the additional front yard. Please
deliver or mail your~Affidavit of Postin(i for receipt by us by January 5, 2009.
If you are not able to meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. Thank
you for your cooperation. (PLEASE DISPLAY YOUR HOUSE NUMBER ALWAYS).
Very truly yours,
Zoning Appeals Board and Staff
Encls.
NOTICE OF HEARING
The following application will be heard by the Southold Town
Board of Appeals at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold:
NAME MOSKOWITZ, J. #6238
MAP #
90-3-14
VARIANCE
SETBACKS & FENCE HEIGHT
REQUEST
MULTIPLE STUCTURES
DATE: THURS, JAN. 8, 2009, 11:00 AM
If you ar.e interested in this pro!ect, you may review the file(s) prior to
the hearing during normal bus~ness days between 8 AM and 3 PM.
ZONING BOARD-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 765-1809
Town Annex/First Noor, North Fork Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 11971
http://southoldtown.norlhfork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Tel, (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO:
Date:
Fax ti
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER.'
i+
SENDER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER:
765-1809 (press 1 at voice recordi~Lg)
REFERENCE::
[] URGENT [] FOR YOUR UPDATE [] PLEASE COMMENT []
NOTES/COMMENTS:
Please find attached copy/copies of dm following:
Thank you.
Sender's hfitiaL~:
~m
®
WEST
LAKE
N~CK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (~) YJ o. ,~,~ SOUTHOLD
¢6
Z-il
~-/~
~-/~
SECTION NO
O9O
PROPERTY MAP
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK
......... = ..................................... x
In the Matter of the Application of '' ..... ,
~ AFFiDAViT
tr~ame of Applicants) MAILINGS
CTM Parcel #1000- ,~¢ - 3 -
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
~ ~ ~ ~ , New York being duly sworn, depose and say that:
On the /~ day of ~¢~ ,200~, I personally mailed at the
United States Post O~ in ~¢¢~ ~ ¢~ , New York, by CERTIFIED
MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a t~e copy of the atta~ed L~al
Notice iB prepaid envelopes address~ to current owners shown on ~e ~rrent
assessment mil verified from the o~ial re~rds on file with the ~ Assessors, 'or
( ) County Real Prope~y O~ce' ,, for evew
properly which abuts and is across a public or pdvate street, or vehicular right.f-
way of record, surrounding the ~~~
Sworn to before me this
~/74day of LT-./'~"~'¢,~/~.~ ,200 ¢
(Notary P u~ c_9.~/
NOTAIIY PUiLI¢-STiI~TI OF HEW ¥OIIK
HO.
GUGIIIleCI Iff Suffolk County
My COrnel#IOn
PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers
next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank
you.
~ost.~ ~0.42 ~o~ $0.42 0935
D Oortir~d Fee $2.~0 0~ -~
~e~ ~lve~ F~ ~ ~es~i~ed Detive~ Fee
Mr. Charles V. Danil~k ~ F Sheena Acha~a
PO BoxY200 ~ ~ 1~6 Franklin Street ..............
Southold, NY 11971 [~ ~2 ..............
~ New York, NY 10013
~'~ClAL USE I
Mr. Richa~appenberg ~"' J m T~,~*~,I$ SS.~I~~
2073 3anet Avenue .............. 1 ~ /~' Mr. ]ohn Montoya
~ ~ [~ 70 Great Oak Drive
No~h Belmore, NY 11710
Manhasset, NY 11030-3329
post~e
S2,20
ELlen M. Violett Trust
230 50m Street
New York, NY i0022
s $0.~
$2.~o /
$0.00 ~
~: $5,~
~ l~ Mr. Marc Sokol
~ ~. 2031 North Mohawk Street
o~o Chicago, IL 60614-
· Complete items 1,2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Reetrioted Delivery is desired.
· Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
· Attach this card to the back of the mailpisce,
or on the front if space permits.
1. PaticleAddressadto:
Mr. Richard Kappenberg
2073 Janet Avenue
North Belmore, NY 11710
2. Artfcle Number
(Transfer from sendce/abe/)
PS Form 3811, February 2004
Addressee
31 Service Type
[] Certit'md M~II [] ~ Mell
[] Registered [] Return Reoelpt for Merchandise
[] Insured Mall [] C.O.D.
7005 3110 0000 2765 7530
D(~lesttc Return Receipt
· Complete items 1,2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
· Prfnt your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
· Attach this card to the back of the mailpisce,
or on the front if space permits.
Ellen M. Violett Trust
230 50th Street
New York, NY 10022
[] Agent
[] Addressee
C. Dat~ of Delive~
D. Isdeliveryaddmssdiffemntftomiteml? []Yes
ff YES, enter delivery address below: [] No
2. Article Number
(T~sfer from ~en,/ce
Ii ' Se~oe 3ype
r-I Ce~tif~cl Mail [] F_~(~mse Mail
[] Registered [] Retum Receipt for Merchandise
[] Insured Mail [] C.O.D.
· Re6tricted Delive~ (Ex'ua Fee) OYes
7005 3110 0000 2765 5291
· ComibletieJtemb'~l, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Res~cted Delivery Is desired.
· Print your narhe and address on the reverse
so that we cRn t'eturn the card to you.
· Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Mr. John Montoya
70 Great Oak Drive
Manhasset, NY 11030-3329
2. Article Nurnbe~
(Transfer fmrn s~-v/ce labs0
B~
D. Isdeliveryaddmssdifferentfiom~teml? []Yes
ff YES, enter delivery address below: [] No
7005 3110 0000 2765 5284
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-154~
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
-TOWN OF $OUTHOLD:NEW YORK
In the Matter of the Application of
(N~me of Applicant)
J4, N 7 2009
AFFIDAVIT
OF SIGN
POSTING
Regarding Posting of Sign upon
Applicant's Land Identified as
4ooo- o - 3
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
I, /~,l~-¢'qL //~/~','7/-' residingat .~,2¢'~5'-//4~/n
~w~ ~ ~-~ , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that:
On the ,~ ~' day of ~1¢,.~ ~¢~' , 200~, I personally placed the
Town's official Poster, with the data of headng and nature of my application
noted thereon, seCurely upon my property, located ten'(1 O) feet or closer from
the street or right-of-way (driveway entrance) - facing the street or facing each
street or right-of-way entrance;* and that
I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in pl~,~ for ~eve~:),~s
prior to the date of the subject hearing ~ ~[li~sho~ to be
~..worn to before me this
day of~,.,,~ 200'~ PlfiB n. ,d~uuw
J
(Notary Public~/
NOTAIY PUIUC-ITAT[ OF HIW YORK
NO, 02MC6131St 4
Q~,~IIIII~I In luffolk County
*near the entrance or driveway entrance of my properly, as the area most visible
to passersby.
4.07-
EXISTING CHAIN LINK,
FENCE TO BE REMOVED
5CALE: I== I0' ~
INPOIKMATION POlK PLOT PLAN TAKEN PIKOM 5LIP,.VEY I~Y
JOHN EMLElK5 LAND 5URVEYOIK DATED: AUGUST 5,
2008
LOT
87
PROPOSED PERGOLA
TO SIT ABOVE
EXISTING DECK
877o/,4,00,q ,
G4. / O'
SITE AND ZONING DATA
ZONING REQUIREMENT5 R-40 EXIDTING CONDITION5 ?ROPOSED CONDTf~.UCTION
A5 PER 260- 124
LOTAREA 14, 1185.P. 14, 11851.
FRONT YARD SETBACK 35,0 PT ] I. 5 PT. ¢ 20, 8 FT. I I, 5 PT. ¢- 20. 8 PT.
REAR YARD 5ETDACK. 35.0 PT J 2. 6 PT.
51DE YARD 5ETSACR I O.O PT N / A N / A
TOTAL ~ BOTH BIDED 25.O PT N / A N / A
MAX. GR065 FLOOR AREA 20% 33 I 9 5.P. 23.5% 33 I 9 5.P. 23.5%
MAXIMUM HEIGHT 35.0' N 20. O' ~T 20. O' PT
THtEt~E .At~IE NO ~I~.¢,IDE C. HA,NQt=$, EXOAVATION, FILLING, AND/OK OLEAt~INO DONE TO THI$ P'I~OPEt~T'I'
PROPOSED
PRIVACY FENCE
& PERGOLA
ATTHE
KASABA RESIDENCE
80 LAKESIDE DRIVE
SOUTHOLD, N.Y.
S.C.T.M. # 1000-90-3-14
REVISIONS
DATE;
PECONIC PERMIT
EXPEDITING
PHONE: 63 I .734.83G I
ITl IESE PLANS AND SPECIFCATIONS AILE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF PECONIC PERMIT EXPEDITING INC,
INM{INGEMEN1 S WILL BE PI~.OS ECUTED,
DATE: 8-18-08
DR. BY: RWL
SCALE: AS NOTED
CHKD:
I
PROJECT NUMBER SHEET NUMBER
0819 A-1
[]1
I I
PERGOLA PLAN
5CALE: I/4" = '-O"
CENTER.LINE Off
COLUMN
2x6 CEDAR
RAFTER.
(2)2x I 0 CEDAR.
GIR.DER.
PERGOLA DETAIL
SCALErI" = I'0"
PERGOLA ELEVATION
SCALE: I/4" = I '-0"
7-3/8" I,S. DIA.
5/8"
COLUMN DETAIL
SCALE: N.T,5,
PROPOSED
PRIVACY FENCE
& PERGOLA
AT THE
KASABA RESIDENCE
80 LAKESIDE DRIVE
SOUTHOLD, N.Y.
S.C.T.M. # 1000-90-3-14
REVISIONS
DATE;
BOULEVARD PLANNING P.C.
ARCHITECTS
671 FRANKLIN AVENUE
GARDEN CITY, N.Y.
516.877.0400
PHON~
PI:CONIC PEP. MIT
EXPEDITING
: G3 I .734.83G I
INFRINGEMENTS Wll[ BE PROSECIJTED.
TIIESE PLANS AND SI ECIFCATIONS ARE [NSTRUMEN'I S Gl~ SERVICE
AND ARE TI IE PROPERTY OF PECONIC PERMIT EXPEDITING INC
DATE: 8-18-08
DR. BY: R W L
SCALE: AS NOTED
CHKD:
PROJECT NUMBEB SHEE'[ NUMBER
0819 A-2