Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009 Catch Basin InventorySOUTHOLDTOWN SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 ATTENTION; MEAGHAN BURKE July 8, 2009 This is in regard to our recent conversation regarding your viewing of our Wetland problems in Southold Shores. I am enclosing letters that you requested in order that you may come on Tarpon Drive and on the property 320 Tarpon Drive and the property behind 320 Tarpon Drive which entends from Main Road to the Bay. I have obtained these letters from the proper authorities. Please call me when you have scheduled a date and my husband who is the President of the Southold Shores Association will be glad to accompany you. He can explain the issues at hand. You may call me at 631-477-6202 at home, or on my Cell Phone 631- 525-7424 when you are ready. n~c..ileen Schiavetta Letters from Michael DiLeone, Road Trustee (Tarpon Drive) Michael Wilson, President of Southold Shores Group, Inc. 0or 5%1-11) the Property described above. SOUTHOLD SHORES GROUP, INC. 590 Tarpon Drive PO Box 870 Southold, NY 11971-0870 July 8, 2009 Town of Southold Dear Sirs and Madams: You have permission to accompany Mr. Robert Schiavetta onto the lot 57-1-11 "Canal/Proposed Canal" for the purpose of determining water runoff. Should you need any further access to this lot, please contact me. Sincerely, Michael R. Wilson President SOUTHOLD TOWN SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 ATTENTION; MEAGHAN BURKE July 8, 2009 Dear Ms. Burke: I Mike DiLeone as Trustee of Tarpon Drive give my permission for the Southold Town to come onto Tarpon Drive to inspect the Wetland situation. Sincerely, Michael DiLeone, Road Trustee AGENDA (With Notations) Hamlet Study Implementation Fishers Island August 5, 2009 1. Discuss Fishers Island Community Board Recommendations outlined in June 5, 2009 memorandum to Supervisor. a= Replacement/repair of Island sidewalks. (PM - Mark Terry) Meaghan Burke, the Planning Department intern conducted a storm water infrastructure and sidewalk survey in July and August of 2009. Both inventories are complete. The sidewalk inventory recorded the condition and areas in need of maintenance, repair and replacement. A slide show will be presented at the Public Meeting proposing a work-plan that was developed with Pete Harris. b= Resurface the basket-ball court by Community Center. (PM - Jim McMahon) The Town Board accepted contractors bid to resurface Basketball court on June, 30, 2009. JB's Asphalt Sealcoating, Inc., to reconstruct/resurface the basketball court on Fishers Island, in accordance with the plans and specification prepared by James Richter, RA, dated May 2§, 2009, in the amount of $18,750. The project is currently in pro.qress. Improvement/resurfacing of Town roadways. ( PM-Pete Harris/Curt Davids Needs further discussion with Town Board d. Permanent fix of "Lake Mobil". (PM- Jamie Richter) Jamie will revisit the drainage system and consider alternative desi ns. "Lake Mobil" e. Re-pave road to Transfer Station entrance. (PM - Pete Harris) Note: this is not Town owned. Met with Pete and he offered to send a pay loader to grade the road. This needs further discussion with Town Board. Fowler culvert drainage repair. (TOS Storm Water Comm.) A drainage easement from the property owners is required to address storm water runoff. g. West Harbor dredging. (PM- Mark Terry) NYSDOS is very interested in project and a letter regarding the consistency of the project with the NYSCMP was received August 3, 2009. The proposed dumping of the contaminated dredge spoil (mercury levels are 4 times the baseline level of the National New London Site) is a large point of contention. h. Community Center Teleconf./Video capability. (Unassigned) Family counseling. (PM- Karen McLaughlin) Karen has reached out to residents and will present a summary of achievements and reported needs. AGENDA Hamlet Study Implementation Fishers Island August 5, 2009 1. Discuss Fishers Island Community Board recommendations outlined in June 5, 2009 memorandum to Town Board. a. Replacement/repair of Island sidewalks. b. Resurface the basket-ball court by Community Center. c. Improvement/resurfacing of Town roadways. d. Permanent fix of "Lake Mobil". e. Re-pave road to Transfer Station entrance. f. Fowler culvert drainage repair. g. West Harbor dredging. h. Community Center Teleconf./Video capability.) i. Family counseling. j. Beach maintenance. a. Trash removal b. Jelly fish net for Dock Beach 2. Review and update 2007/2008 Stakeholder recommendations 3. Discuss Planning Board re-prioritization of recommendations. a. Sidewalks and pothole assessment and repair (1) b. Housing (2) j. Beach maintenance (Unassigned) i. Trash removal ii. Jelly fish net for Dock Beach 2. Review and update 2007/2008 Stakeholder recommendations 3. Discuss Planning Board re-prioritization of recommendations. a. Sidewalks and pothole assessment and repair (1) b. Housing (2) 2009 Town People Attendance 1. Andaloro, Jen - Assistant Town Attorney 2. Ball, Lillian - Land Preservation Committee 3. Beltz, Phillip - Special Projects Coordinator 4. Bergen, Dave - Town Trustee 5. Berliner, Sandra - Office of the Supervisor 6. Byrnes, Shawn - Public Works 7. Credo, Richard - Board of Ethics 8. Cullinane, Maureen - Land Preservation Committee 9. Cushman, John - Comptroller 10. Davids, Curt - Deputy Highway Superintendent 11. Doherty, Jill - Town Trustee 12. Doroski, Melanie - Land Preservation Department 13. Eckhardt, Mike - Public Works 14. Finnegan, Martin - Town Attorney 15. Hardy, Doug - Conservation Advisory Committee 16. Harris, Peter - Highway Superintendent 17. Horton, Audrey - Anti Bias Task Force 18. Hulse, Loft - Assistant Town Attorney 19. Huntington, Ray - Land Preservation Committee 20. Hydell, Carol - Town Clerk's Office 21. Jerome, John - Public Works 22. King, Jim - Town Trustee 23. Krupski, Albert - Town Board 24. Lanza, Heather- Director of Planning 25. Losquadro, Anthony- Southold H.S. Student Intern 26. Martin, Thomas - Southold Town Fire Coordinator 27. Neville, Betty - Town Clerk 28. Norklun, Stacy - Records Management 29. Orlando, Vincent - Town Board 30. Rabbitt, Tom - Southold Youth Bureau 31. Rakobitsch, Roy - Renewable Energy Committee 32. Randolph, Linda - Planning Department 33. Reisenberg, Lloyd - Data Processing 34. Richter, Jamie - Town Engineer 35. Ruland, Bill - Town Board 36. Russell, Scott - Supervisor 37. Sadoo, Tamara- Planning Department 38. Schiller, Greta - Conservation Advisory Council 39. Schneider, Ken - Zoning Board of Appeals 40. Scott, Bob - Assessor 41. Sepenoski, John - Land Preservation 42. Sheryll, Barbara - Southold Youth Bureau 43. Sleckman, Kathy - Board of Ethics 44. Solomon, Connie - Accounting 45. Solomon, George - Planning Board 46. Spiro, Melissa - Land Preservation 47. Standish, Lauren - Trustees' Office 48. Terry, Mark - Planning 49. Trimble, Ann - Conservation Advisory Council 50. Verity, Mike - Building Department 51. Webster, Kevin - Assessor 52. Weisman, Leslie - Zoning Board of Appeals 53. Wickham, Thomas - Town Board 54. Wills, Frank - Renewable Energy Committee 55. Winser, Kristy - Planning 56. Woodhull, Ruthanne - Office of the Supervisor 57. Young, Peter - Conservation Advisory Council Itinerary for Fishers Island Town Board Trip August 5, 2009 10:00 11:25 11:30 12:30 1:30 2:45 4:00 Ferry will depart from Plum Island Dock in Orient Approximate arrival at Fishers Island Residents meet and greet officials Lunch Southold Town Board Meeting and fielding of questions Ferry departs Fishers Island Approximate arrival at Plum Island Dock in Orient Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows ARTICLE III, Snow and Ice Removal [Adopted 4-19-1994 by L.L. No. 5-1994] § 237-19. Intent. It is the intent o£the Town Board to place the responsibility o£kecping sidewalks clean with the property owners adjacent to the sidewalk. ~.~237-20. removal; general maintenance. Snow and ice Each owner or occupant of any house or other building, and any owner or person entitled to possession of any vacant lot, and any person having charge of any church or any public building in the Town shall, during the winter season or during the time snow shall continue on the ground, keep the sidewalk in front of the lot or house free from obstruction by snow or ice and icy conditions and shall at all times keep the sidewalk in a clean condition, free from filth, dirt, weeds or other obstructions or encumbrances. § 237-21. Penalties for offenses. [Added 3-1-2005 by L.L. No. 3-20051 Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a violation and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding $250 for each offense. Each day's continued violation shall constitute a separate additional offense or violation. FISHERS ISLAND, NY 06390 Hamlet of the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SIDEWALK SURVEY FISHERS ISLAND, NY 06390 Hamlet of the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SIDEWALK SURVEY Enclosed you will find 1) a street map highlighting the location of sidewalks on the west end of Fishers Island. 2) an informal walking map of the West end of Fishers Island that details retail locations and heavy foot and bike traffic. 3) a map with bold numbers written in that correspond to numbered pictures of sidewalks. 4) picmres 5) observations and recommendations for sidewalk repair. [] Show Counties tp://maps.hometownlocator.com/map.html?state=NY&sns=NewYork&county= 103 19.07.2008 Fishers -Island, New York I~ARBOR %,. ! \ WEST HAY HARBOE GOLF B Uo S. liZildcrn c~s Pt. .3 "::deal ' Fishers Island Sidewalk Survey Observations and Recommendations As members oftbe Fishers Island Community Board (FICB), in recognition of the Town of Southold and Hamlet stakeholder analysis of the Island's needs, we present this informal sidewalk inventory and analysis for your consideration We make no claims or assumptions as to Town responsibility or Property owner respons~ility for ~pair and maintenance of sidewalks. 3% of the sidewalks are in excellent condition 12% of the sidewalks are in average to good condition~ 35% of the sidewalks are in poor condition and need repair 50% of the sidewalks are in extremely bad condition and are in need of immediate repair. Residents of Fishers Island have long known that most sidewalks on the island are in bad condition. Walkers and joggers, both adult and children, oi~en opt to walk or jog in the street due to the unsafe conditions. Those that do use the sidewalk must be constantly vigilant to avoid injury or mishap. Two (2) accidents related to sidewalk conditions have occurred this summer. Both resulted in serlons injury. Recommendations We would like to recoaax~end that all numbered locations be fixed, but due to vehicle traffic patterns, conditions of sidewalks and high pedestrian use we recommend the following be considered urgent: 1) The entire sidewalk on Equestrian Avenue from the Parade Ground Apartment property to the Village Triangle (with the exception of two spots between the Dock Pond and the Museum). d~o ~ ~ 2) The sidewalk in the village triangle nmning fi.om The News Cafe to Drink N Vessel. 3) Brush and vegetation should be cut back along the entire length of Montauk Ave. Much of that sidewalk is in very poor condition, but significant portions are so overgrown that it is difficult to locate the sidewalk. We look forward to your response and projected date that the repairs will take place. For further information or a guided walking tour of the sidewalks of the Fishers Island, please feel fi.ce to contact us. Respectfully submitted, Patty Faulkner Cynthia Riley Journal of Physical Activity and Health 2006, 1,1-14 © 2006 Human Kinetics, Inc. Perceptions of Neighborhood Sidewalks on Walking and Physical Activity Patterns in a Southeastern Community in the US Julian A. Reed, Dawn K. Wilson, Barbara E. Ainsworth, Heather Bowles, and Gary Mixon Background: Thc purpose of this study was to examine thc relationships between pemeptions of neighborl',o,~d sidcw~ lk~ .tm.L :-ace. ~md walking ant physical activ- ity (PA) patterns in a southeastern IlS community ~lethocL~: A telephone survey was administered to a stratdied sample of adults (N = 1148). Physical activity was categorized ¢.i:cordir~g to thc CDC/ACSM ~cco mncndati(,ns. R(spondcnts were also asked if they walked £or at least 10 rain at a time for recreation, exercise, transportatiom or while at work. Rexult,~: A greater proportion (44%) of respondents who reported ha~ lng neighborhood sidc~ a!ks were irregular [valkers (OR = 1.88; 95% C1 = I. 13, 3. [ I ). For whites, (hut not for non-whites) the perceived presence of sidewalks increased the odds for mccti ng recommended PA levels (P < 0.05; OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.05, 12.24). Com'lu~sio,s: Presence of neighborhood sidewalks was related to irregular walkine lcxel~ o£ respondents. Sidewalk presence was related to PA in whites, but was not related to activity patterns of non-whites. Key Words: physical cnviroumcnt, ( I)C/A('SM Recommendations Despite the benefits of regular physical activity (PA), nearly half of American adults in 2003 did not engage in enough moderate intensity activity to obtain health benefits, and nearly a quarter did not engage in any leisure time activity? Physical activity, like many behaviors, is complex and influenced by a variety of factors. Previous studies2 ~have revealed that community environmental supports are associated with PA behavi(m For example, proximity to exercise facilities,4 street designfi.° the location of recreational trai}s,~8 bike paths~ and the presence of sidewalks6"~are all enviroomeotal supports identified in the literature associated with PA patterns. Reed is with thc Dcp! of ftcalth and F. xcrcisc Scicm;c. Furman I!nivcrsit), Greenville, SC 29613. Wilson is with thc Dcpt ol'l%ychology, Barnwell College, Unix, crsity ,.~f South ( arolina, Columbia, SC 29208. Ainsworth is with thc I)cpt of ;{xcrcisc and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, Bo~Hcs is ~xith thc l)cpt ol F. pidemiology and Biostatistics. Arnold School or' Public Health, [Jnix ersity o! South ('aroliml. Columbia, St' 29208. MiXoll Is xxith the Stlllllcr County Parks and Recreation [ )cpi, Stlmt{-r, S( ~ 29150. 245 246 Reed et al. Researchers have begun to use ecological models to examine how physical environments are related to PA behavior. Ecological models are applicable to PA because they assume multiple levels of influence, emphasizing the impact of public policies, social systems, and physical environments.~°' ~ The impact of the physical environment on PA has not been thoroughly examined and thus, causal influences cannot be attributed.?" However, changes to physical and built environments to support PA may be implemented by creating or enhancing access to such facilities as sidewalks, walking trails, biking trails, and community exercise facilities?4 Surveillance data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) between 1986-1998~. %as identified walking as the most common form of recreational PA that has health benefits, and is an activity that can be done by most people?" LaMaitre et al? showed that women who walked regularly for at least 45 min/d, 3 to 4 times/wk, had 60% lower all cause mortality rates than their inactive counterparts. The presence of sidewalks is often perceived as an environ- mental support for walking in adults. Wilcox et al.? for example, found that the perceptions of neighborhood sidewalks were positively associated with PA. Other studies have examined the health benefits of walking and have documented similar findings;2,8'9 yet few studies have identified environmental supports and/or con- straints for walking.6-7.9, ~2 ~. ~The present study expands on previous reseamh by examining the relationship between environmental features (presence of sidewalks) and PA levels by race, age, and education attainment in a large sample of adults in a southeastern US community. The present study will expand our understanding of how environmental fea- tures in a neighborhood or communit) may be associated with regular PA. For walking, sidewalks can serve as a supportive feature if they are well maintained and in locations desirable for walking. However, the absence of sidewalks may serve to constrain walking behaviorsP. '). ~2 In the present study we examine the relationships between the perceptions of the presence of neighborhood sidewalks and their association with walking and PA behaviors in a southeastern community of South Carolina. In addition, a secondary purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between race, age, and education and perceptions of the presence of neighborhood sidewalks on PA levels and walking. Methods Subjects Residents of a rural southeastern community (N = 114~h age 18 to 96 y) were surveyed from January to February 2001 usiag a telephone survey method. The respondents interviewed for this study were selected from a stratified random sample of households with listed telephone nnmbers in Sun,ter Cmmty, South Carolina. The county population was stratified by ceasus tracts to guarantee a balance in the racial profile and the geographic distribution of the study sample. Households were selected randomly within each census tract. Twenty-one census tracts were surveyed with 2 to 80 respondents per u act tmudian = 61: 25th 75th inter-quartile range = 53 to 76) per tract. The number of households selected was proportional to the percentage of the connty's total populafion in that tract. Listed telephone Perceptions of Sidewalks on Walking and PA Patterns 247 numbers were purchased from a marketing-based company and used to sample the population. The response rate was 540,~. Procedures The Survey Research Laboratory (SRL) at the University of South Carolina con- ducted the interviewing. Prior to the actual fieldwork, the interviewers and supervi- sors received I d of special traini ng for this study. Two pretests were conducted by SRLduring January. After the firs[ pretest, rews~ons were made based on interviewer experiences and a second pretest was conducted. Senior SRLinterviewers conducted all of the pretest interviews. The interviews were conducted using Sawtooth Ci3 computer-aided telephone interviewi ng software at the SRUs interviewing facilities. The study began in mid-January and ended in mid-February with 38 interviewers working on the project. A specific number of residents proportional to the total population and racial distribution of the population were randomly selected from each census tract. Because of the geographical restrictions of the sampling design a listed sample was used. A listed sample includes telephone numbers that would be located in a phone book or other directories that allow the phone numbers to be connected to identifiable addresses. Dnring the interview, once a household was contacted, a respondent age 18 or older was randomly selected from all of the adults age 18 or older living in the household using the next-birthday method. Perceptions of Environmenta~ Supports Questionnaire Items for the questionnaire were developed from an extensive literature review,3, ~3.2*Z2expert input, and community focus groups for assessing facilitators and bar- riers to PA? Respondents provided their hcme address, length of residency, race, age, and education level. Each respondent was asked one question related to the presence of their neighborhood sidewalks. Respondents were asked if their neigh- borhood had any sidewalks tyes, nc, do aot know). Neighborhood was defined as a 0.5 mile radius or 10 rain drive from the respondent's residence. Validity (based on geo-coding) and reliability for all neighborhood survey items were kappa = -0.02 to 0.37 and tho = 0.42 to 0.74, respectively.22 Physical Activity Measures Physical activity was measured using the 20(11 BRFSS PA modnle. This module has been used for national PA surveillance and to assess PA in research studies.~'-9-2a Physical activity classifications for the present stndy were based on the CDC/ACSM recommendations? Six qnest~ons were nsed r.o assess the freqnency and duration of moderate and vigorous PA. Summary scores were categorized as follows; Meets Recommendations: 30 rain per day fo' 5 d pe~ week of moderate-intensity PA or 20 min per session for 3 d per week of vigorous-intensity PA; Irregular: some PA but not enough to meet recommendations: and Inactive: no moderate- or vigorous- intensity PA. Three additional questions assessed the respondents' daily walking behavior. Respondents were, asaea if they watked for at least I0 rain at a time for recreation, exercise, transportation, or while at work. Th,%e who responded affir- matively were asked how many days per week and how much time per day they 248 Reed et al. walked. From these data, respor~dents were categorized as: Regular Walking: > 150 min of walking per week; Irregular Walking: some walking, bnt less than amounts indicated for regular: and No Walking: no walking reportedP Analysis Sample weights were constructed following the protocol of the BRFSS PA module to ensure that statistical analyses of the validity sample were generalizable to the population?. 24 Descriptive analyses (weighted proportions) and standard errors (SE) were calculated using SAS-callable SUDAAN version 8.0. All other analyses were conducted using SAS version 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Because the sampling rates varied by census tract and race, analysis weights were constructed to insure that statistical analyses were generalizable to the population. The weights had two components, following the protocol of the BRFSS. The first factor adjusted for the number of adults and the number of voice phone lines in the households. The second post-stratification factor adjusted for the census population by age- race-sex group to account for the differential sampling and response rates. The post-stratification factor was constructed within each census tract, although the sample was treated as a single stratum for analysis. Prior to analysis, demographic variables with continuous data were categorized as follows: Age: 18 to 29, 30 to 44, 45 to 64, and 65 to 74 y; Education: less than high school, high school graduate, some college, and college gra&~ate. Race was categorized as non-white or white. Percentages and standard errors were computed for each dernographic variable by the self-reported presence or absence of sidewalks in the neighborhood. Generalized logistic regression was used to compare the level of PA behavior by the perceived presence or absence of sidewalks. Similar analyses were performed for the level of walking behaviors. Analyses were performed for the combined sample and stratified by race, age, and education. Odds ratios a~d 95% confidence intervals were calculated to identify significant differences. For all comparisons, the refer- ent category was Inactive when conmaring PA behaviors and No Walking when comparing walking behaviors. An odds ratio greater than t.0 reflects an increased likelihood of having higher levels of PA and/or walking. Results Sidewalk Presence by Demographics Percentages representing the percei veal pres.race and absence of ~eighborhood side- walks by demographic characteristics are listed in T~tble I. Among the respondents, 224 (19.5%) reported a perceived presence o{' sidewalks in their neighborhood and 924 (79.5%) reported a perceived absence of neighborhood sidewalks. There was a significant difference (P < 0.053 m the distribution of race groups between neighborhoods with sidewalks present and neighborhoods with sidewalks absent. Among respondents who reported a perceived presence of neighborhood sidewalks a greater percentage were non wmt: (~:>.'7%); however, in neighborhoods without sidewalks, a greater percentage of respondents were white (61.4%). No differences were observed in the pcrcei 've~ prcser, c-' of ~dewalks by age or educational attain- Perceptions of Sidewalks on Walking and PA Patterns 249 Table I Weighted Percentages of Age, Sex, Race, and Education by Presence and Absence of Neighborhood Sidewalks Sidewalks present Sidewalks absent Demographic n = 224 n = 924 characteristic Weighted % (SE) Weighted % (SE) P-value Age group (y) 18-29 26~7 (-t.5) 24.0 (2.2) 30-44 30.2 (4.2) 33.3 (2.2) 45-64 24.8 (3.4) 27.5 (1.9) 65-74 18.3 (9.?) 15.? ({.3) 0.5756 Sex Male 36.9 (4.3) 45.2 (2.3) 0.0880 Female 63. ~ (-L? } 5:1-.~ (2.3) Race White 44.3 0.4) 61.4 (2.2) 0.0008 Non-white 55.7 (4.4) 38.6 (2.2) Education < High school I 3. I (2.5) 12.7 (i.3) High school gradu 28.7 ~4.~:,) 33.7 (2.2) ate Some college 37.7 (4.4) 30.5 (2.1) College graduate 20.5 t3.3) 23.1 (2.0) 0.4809 Note. Weighted percents were dcrivcd frun SAS-callable SUDAAN statistical analysis to ensure the sample was representative of thc connt) ?opulatich. ment (P > 0.05). Therefore the remaining analyses were stratified by race but not by age or educational attainment. Sidewalks, PA, and Walking Table 2 shows the associations between the presence of sidewalks and PA and walking behaviors. For walking, the perceived presence of sidewalks increased the odds for irregular walking only (OR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.13, 3. I 1 ). No associations were observed between PA levels and tl~e presence of sidewalks (P > 0.05). Sidewalks, PA, and Walking by Race Results presented in Tabie 3 were stratified by race, and therefore were not the product of direct comparisoas across race. In whites, perceiving the presence of sidewalks increased the od~[s :',~ r',eeting recommended levels of PA (OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.05, 12.24) compared ~o inactive adults. Perceived presence of sidewalks was not associated with regular walking in Whites (P > 0.05). In non-whites, no significant associations were observed between the presence of sidewalks and PA levels or walking (P > 0.05). 250 Reed et al. Table 2 Predicted Percentages of Physical Activity and Walking Patterns Related to the Presence and Absence of Neighborhood Sidewalks for All Respondents, Adjusted for Age, Sex, Race, and Education Sidew&lks Sidewalks Overall present absent P-value Level of physical predicted predicted Odds ratio present vs. activity % (SE) % (SE) (95% Cl) absent Meets 43.6 (4.6) 37.9 (2.3) 1.44 0.4322 recommendt:tic ns (ti.8 I, 2.56) Irregularly acti~ c 41.8 (~,.-r) ~.I~ t2,2) i. i8 (0.6'~' 2.113) Inactive 14.6 (2.9) 18.0 (1.6) 1.00 Regular walking 37.0 (4.3) 40.2 (2.3) 1.30 0.0390 (0.76, 2.21 ) Irregular walking 43.6 (4.4) 32.8 t2.0) 1.88 (1.13.3.tl) No walking ~9.4 (3.2) 27.0 (2.0) 1.00 I)iscussion Perceptions of neighborhood sidewalks in the present study were associated with the increased odds for irregular walking for all respondents. Perhaps the walking patterns of irregular walkers were more influenced by environmental supports than regular walkers. This uotiou suggests that regular walkers were perhaps not dependent on sidewalks fop walking, because walking can take place in other environments. 'When results were stratified by race, the perceived presence of sidewalks was associated with meeting the CDC-ACSM f% recommendations in white respondents only. In a survey of women residi~g in two Sonlh Carolina me[ropolitan communi- ties, Ainsworth et al? reported ~hat the p~:~ ception of sidewalks and seeing people walking in the neighborhood were related with increased levels of PA. In the pres- ent study, those who reported the presence of neighborhood sidewalks were more likely to engage in irregnlar walking; thus providing additional evidence of the association between the presence of neighborhood sidewalks and some walking patterns. However, no statistically significnnt association was observed between regular walking. The perceived presence of neighborhood sidewalks being related to only irregular walking was somewhat surprising given prior studies have shown an association between neighborh,',od sidewalks and regular walking behaviors? 2o, z5 However, our study did not ~p~citi,:;d~y address other environments in which walking could have taken place (e.g., treadmill, indoor recreation centers, etc.). It is possible that adults who walk regularly will do so regardless of the presence or absence of neighborhood sioewalks. When the overall sample was exmnined without adjusting for race, no associa- tions were observed between PA levels aad the presence of neighborhood sidewalks. T,~h_ !e 3 ........ t( ...... k. by Race, Adjust;ed for Age, Sex, and Education Predicted P~rcenta~tes of Physical Activity and Walking Patterns Related to the Presence and Sidewalks present Sidewalks absent Odds ratio ~,edicted % (SE) r. redicted % (SE) (95% Cl) 5~.7 (7.0) 38.8 (2.9) 3.59 (1.05, 12.24) 38.9 (6.7) 42.8 (2.9) 2.30 (0.72, 7.31 ) ?.4 (2.7) 18.4 (2.2) 1.00 no,:e [ eve! of l,h~faical ac.'.ivity White Meei~ r~ commendations lrregularl3 active lnacti; e Present vs. absent P-value 0.0212 ~, · 0 80 (0.37.1.71) Mee~< rcco,r, nendations 34.5 (5.7) ~7.0 (~ .o) lrregularl3 active :i-5.4 (5.9) [5.7 (3.6) 0.85 (0.42, 1.73) Inactive 20.1 (4.4) ~7.4 (2.4) 1.00 0.8422 White Regular x~alking No walking 37.9 (6.7) 41.6 (2.9) 1.41 (0.48,4.13) q~-.l (6.6) ., I.,, (2.6) 2.2{) (0. ,9, 6.12) 18.0 (4.5) 27.5 (2.7) 1.00 0.0845 Non-white Regular ~ alking Irregular walking No walking 35.5 (5.6) 38.2 {3.5) 1.22 (0.59.2.54) 44.3 (5.9) 35.5 (3.4) 1.64 (0.82, 3.29) 20.2 (4.5) 26.3 (3.0) 1.00 0.3510 252 Reeci et al. The lack of association between PA and sidewalks without adjusting for race was likely due to similar proportions of aduits reporting the presence or absence of sidewalks ar each PA level. Thus, it appears that sidewalks and participation in moderate and vigorous PAs was unrelated in the present study. Differeaces in as,,;ociations between sidewalks and PA levels and walking behaviors by race were, however, observed. There was a significant association between the perceived presence of neighborhood sidewalks and PA levels in whites but not in non-whites. Among respondents who reported sidewalks present in their neighborhoods, more whites than non-whites met the CDC-ACSM recommenda- tions for PA (53.5% vs. 34.5%, respectively). This racial difference is despite the fact that more non-whites than whites reported a perceived presence of neighbor- hood sidewalks (55.7% vs. 44.3%) and is consistent with other studies that have demonstrated that non-whites are less physically active than whites? The obser- vation that more whites were active at recommended PA levels than non-whites is also consistent with most national surveys of PA habits~, 27, 28 and suggests that added efforls are needed to increase PA levels in non-whites. It has been observed in focus group studies2~:~ and in quantitative studies32.-~,~ that fear of crime and fear for one's personal safety among ethnic minority groups are barriers to walking and being physically active in neighborhood settings. Wilson et al.26examined perceptions of access and safety for PA in neighborhoods that were identified as Iow or high in social economic status (SES) in a similar population in rural South Carolina and found that the Iow (vs. high) SES group reported higher perceptions of neighboraood crime, however, objective GIS data did not support this percep- tion difference. The high SES group was more likely to be white than those in the low SES group.26 Therefore, the perception differences among environmental sup- ports for PA in the present study are relevant, and additional studies are needed to increase understandin,g of safety of neighborhood environments, PA ,and walking behaviors in minority populations. Analysis of walking behaviors by the perceived presence or absence of sidewalks in whites and non-whites showed no association between walking behaviors and the perceived presence of neighborhood sidewalks across different race groups. This is likely due to the similar proportions of respondents reporting regular walldng in both races. Although the walking patterns of white and non- white respondents were not associated v, ith sidewalk presence in the present study; walkingS- ~ and PA at cnrrent recommended levelsm, 35 has been associated with the aesthetic qualities of the environment. For example, Addy et al? showed that perceived environmental variables soch as good street lighting, accessible parks, sports fields, and playgrounds were attrnctive features associated with regular PA and walking participat,on. Limitations There are several limitations to the present study. Physical activity data and side- walk data were obtained I~y self-reporL Although the 2001 BRFSS PA module questions for demographics ano health b~haviors have been thoroughly examined,35 the self-repc,ffea PA dam collected in th;s study could possibly be an underestimate or overestimate of PA uehavior in this southeastern community. A cross-sectional study in a rural southe ~stern community in South Carolitm may also limit the gen- Perceptions of Sidewalks on Walking and PA Patterns 253 eralizability of findings to other areas of the US. In addition, the walking measure used in the present study combined all L, pes of wafking and is a limitation because if the walking was not undertaken where neighborhood sidewalks may influence the behavior, then it is plausible that the perceptions of sidewalk presence will not influence respondent walking patterns. Limiting the focus of the study to linking the perceptions of sidewalk presence to respondent walking patterns did not take into account other euviromnents where walking could have taken place. Thus, the perceptions of sidewalks for some respondents could not have been related to their walking patterns. Implications The findings from the present study iadicate that the percei veal presence of neighbor- hood sidewalks rna5 be related to walking and PA betmviors in certain subgroups of individuals such as irregular walkers and among white adults. Examining the perceptions of neighbc;,rhood sidewalks provides empirical data documenting the impact of neighborhood sidewalks on walking and PA behavior. These findings could therefore be used to help Local officials lobby for policies requiring all new developments to ha~e adequate sidewalks to increase walking and PA opportunities. Efforts for improving awareness of environmental supports for PA and walking should also be a focus of future research among those who are inactive. Acknowledgments This study was supported b) the 1~ enters for Disease ConLml and Prc~ ention coopera- tive agreement U48/CCI,.4-09664-06. References 1. Centers £or Disease Control aud Prevention. Physical activity trends--United States, 1990-1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wklv Rep. 2001 ;50:166-169. 2. Brownson RC, Houseman RA, Brown DR, et al. Promoting physical activity in rural communities. Am J Prey Med. 2000;18:235-241. 3. Sallis Jl-, J.3h.l~;oh ME Cv. lfas K J, el aL Assessing percei,.'ed physical environmental variables that ma)' influence physical activity. Re.', Q ~rerc Sport 1997;68:345-35 I. 4. Sallis .IE Melbourne H. HofsteUer ('R, et al. Distance between homes and exercise facilities relalcd lo h'equeucy of exercise among San Diego residents. Public Health Rep. 1990;105:179-185. 5. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. bt:~atize h~flnc~ces of individual, social environmental and physical environmental correlates ot walking. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1583- 1589. 6. Addy CL, Wilson I)K. Kirtland KA, &insworth BE. Sharpe P. Kimscy D. Association of perceived social and physical cnviromnenml supports with physical activity and walking behavior. Am J Public Healtt). 2004;94:440-443. 7. Merom D. Baum,~n A, Vita P, cl al. An cnvinmmental intcrve~lion to promote walking and cycling--thc impact of a newly constructed Rail trail in Western Sydney. Prev Med. 2003;36:235-242 8. Rohm DY, Voorl~,ee, C(!. I'crsonal. social and envinmmental correlates of physical activity in urban Alrican-Amcrican ~tlmcn. Am J Prey Med. 2(103; 25 (3 Suppl I): 38-44. 254 Reed et al. 9. Ainsworth BE. Wilc,~x S, Thompson WW. Richter 1)1,, Henderson KA. Personal, social and physical environmental correlates of ph3 sical activity in African American women in South Carolina. Am J Prey Med. 201)3; 25 (3 Supplement I): 23-29. 10. King AC, Jelled' RW. Fridinger F, et al. Enxirenmental and policy approaches to cardiovascular disease prevention through physical activity: Issues and opportunities. HealthEdtw Q. 1995;22:499-51 I. 11. Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education. San l-rancisco: Jossey-Bass: 1997, p. 403-424. 12. Saelens BE Sallis JF. Frank I J). Environmental correlalcs of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003 ;25:80-9 I. 13. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Houseman R.&, e~ al. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in thc ! lnitcd States. Am J Public Health. 2001 ;91: 1995-2003. 14. Ewing R. Can the physical envir,)nmcm determine physical ac0v0y levels? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004; 33(2):69-75. 15. Caspersen CJ. Merritt RK. Physical activity trends among 26 states, 1986-1990. Med Sci Sport; Exert, 1995;27:713 720. 16. Pate R, Pratt M, Blair S, Haskell W, et al. Physical activit3 and public health: A recom- mendation from the Centers for Disea~;c Control and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 19951273:402-407. 17. Lamaitre RN. Heckbert SR, Psaty BM, ct al. [xfisure-time physical activity, and risk of non-fatal myocardial inlarction among postmcnopausal women. Am J Health Promo- tion. 1995;155:2302-2308. 18. Wilcox S, Bopp M, Obcrrccht I , Kammem)ann SK, McEmurra3 CT. Psychosocial and perceived environmental correlates of physical activity iq rural and older and white women. J Geromol B Pvychol Sci Sac Sci. 2003;58:P329-P337. 19. Brownson RC, Baker EA. Housemana RA. Brcnnan LK, Bacak SJ. Environmental and policy determinants of ph)sical ac;~vity in thc United States. Ant J Public Health. 2001 ;91: 1995 -2003. 20. US Dept of Transportation (National tiighwa3 Traffic Safety Administration, Traffic Safety Factr 2001 (Washington: US l)ept of Transportation. 2003). The total number of passenger kilometers of travel by motor vehicle, bic3cle and fool were calculated by Mar) Ann Keyes of thc Federal Highway Administration using unpublished data from thc 200i National Household Travel Survey. 21. King AC, Blair SN, Hdd I)E, :'1 al. Dclclt¥~ nalllS of ph? sical activily and interventions in adult~. Med Sci Syort,, Exert. 1992'24:5221-5236. 22. Kirtland KA, Porter f)E,,'~,ddy ('L, Ne,,r MJ. Wi!lioms.lt:,Sharpc PA, NcfflJ, Kimsey CD Jr, Ainsworth BI~: Environmental measmes of physica~ activity sapports: Perception versus rcalit3. Am J Pre) Med. 2003:2-h323-33 !. 23. (?lark DO. Physical activity and correlates among urban prilnaD' care patients aged 55 years and older. J Gerontol. !999:54B: 24. Henderson KA, Neff [ J, ~harpe [~&, ct M It takes a village to pa)mote physical activity: the potential for public park and recreation departments. J Park Ret: Adm. 2001;19: 23 -.4- i. 25. Powell Kfz, Martin LM ct al. PI:tees to walk: convenience and regular physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2¢)03:93iq): 15 ! 9-152 I. 26. Wilson I)K. Kirtiand K A, Ainsworth ~'~ E. Add), t ?1. Socioeconomic status and percep- tions of access and safety for ph3sical ~cti,,ity. /~nn Bchal, ~ed. 2004; 24:20-28. 27. Schiller 31,',;. Coriety Nelson Z, Hat) C. Barnes R harly release of selected estimates based on da~ fram ibc Jam~aO -,~Aarch 201~- N,~.tionai Health Interview Survey. National CenterJor ~tealth ',gta;islic's. htq¢Ji~ w~.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. September 2004. Perceptions of Sidewalks on Wa',king and PA Patterns 255 28. Dowda M,Ainsworth B E. Add) ('L Saundcrs R. Riacr W. Correlates of physical activity among ILS. youug adults. 18 to 30 )cars of age. £rom NHANES Ill. Atln Behav Med 2003; 2¢7( I ): 15-23. 29. EylerAA, Baker E, Cromer I,, King AC. Brownson RC, Donatelle RJ. Physical activity and minority women: a qualitative study. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(5):640-652. 30. Wilbur J. Chandler 1~. Dancy B, Choi J, Plonczynski Il, Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity in urban, African-American women. Women and Health. 2002;36(2): 17-28. 31. Young DR, He X, Harris I, M~th~' 1. Environmental, policy, and caltural factors minted to physical activity in well-educated urban, Ai'rican-Amcrican women. Women and Health. 2002;36(2):29 41. 32. Ross, CE. Walking, expertise, and stocking: does neighborhood matter? Soc Sci Med. 2000;51 (2):265-274. 33. Craig CI,, Brownson RC, Cragg SE, I)nnn AL Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: A study ex'tmining walking to work. Am J Prey Med. 2002;23(2S): 36-43. 34. King AC, Castro C. et al. Persona! and environmental factors associated with physi- cal inactivity among dilfcrent racial-ethnic groups of tls middle-aged and older-aged women. Health Psy~'hologv. 2000:19(4): 354-364. 35. Catlin TK. Simoes EJ, Bmwnson RC. Environmental and policy factors associated with overweight adults in Mis,,ouri. Alit ,1 Health Promo¢'ion. 20(13; 17:246-258. Welcome to Local Government Services Page 1 of 2 Shared Services Proaram I Training I Smart Growth I A~)oalachian Reaional Commission I Watershed Search Local Govemment: · Division of Local Government Services HomeoaRe · Contact the Division of Local Govemment Service~ · What's New · Traininq for Local Officials · Publications and Forms · Links of interest to Local Govemments · Technical Assistance in the New York City Watershed · Appalachian R~qional Commission · Shared Services Program · Smart Growth Current Funding Availability Funding under the Brownfield Opportunity Areas (BOA) Program is available to municipalities, 501 (c) (3) community-based organizations and New York City Community Boards to foster redevefopment and return dormant and blighted land into productive and catalytic areas while restoring environmental quatity. This program provides resources for communities to undertake araa-wide brownfield rodevelopment planning and to complete environmental site assessment for strategic redevelopment parcels. Applications are accepted on a continuous basis throughout the year for new projects and projects advancing to the next step. Full details and an application package for the BOA program: htta://www.nvswatedronts.com/BOA Dackaae.asD Funding under Title 11 of the New York State Environmental Protection Fund Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (EPF LWRP) is available to cities, ~wns, villages and counties to prepare, refine or implement Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs. The EPF LWRP encourages commun~es to plan for the future of their water~onts and undertake improvement projects to implement their plans. Applications are due by 4:00 P.M. on SEPTEMBER 16, 2009. Full details and an application package for the EPF LWRP: httn://www.nvswatarfronts.com/(lrantoDDs EPF.aso Funding from the Environmental Protection Fund New York State Smart Growth Grant Program is available to municipalities and/or not-for-profits for grants in the Lower Hudson Valley (LHV) Region. The availability of funding was announced on Apdl 1. The request for applications is being reissued. Minor modifications have been made to the funding available for each grant activity as follows: Revitalization and redevelopment of municipal and regional centera (up to $250,000 available) One award for a preparation of a regional plan analyzing the connection among land use, vehicle miles traveled and climate change (a minimum of $250,000 available) Applications ara due by 4:00 P.M. on SEPTEMBER 16, 2009. Full details and an application package for the LHV Smart Growth Program: Smart Growth LHV Application (word doc) Smart Growth LHV Aoplication (PDF) Smart Growth LHV RFA (word doc) Smart Growth LHV RFA (PDF) Funding under the Local Government Efficiency Grant Program (LGE) is available to counties, cities, towns, villages, special improvement districts, fire districts, public libraries, association libraries, water authorities, sewer authorities, regional planning and development boards, school districts, and Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) to reduce municipal expenses and property taxes, by incantivizing cooperative activities between municipal~es. The LGE Program provides eligible applicants with planning and implementation funding for transformative projects that will reduce local government expenses. Applications are due by 4:00 P.M. on SEPTEMBER 23, 2009. Full details and an application package for the LGE Program: htLo://www.dos stata.nv,us/Ioss/sharedservices http://www.dos.state.ny.us/communityprojects/grantprogramdetails.htm 7/20/2009 Welcome to Local Government Services Page 2 of 2 Details of these grant programs will be highlighted in a sedes of regional workshops to be held in mid- July. These workshops will provide an overview of the programs, information on how to apply for these grants and presentations of success stodes by local communities who have benefitted from previous grant awards. There will also be an opportunity for communities to talk about their project ideas. For information on dates and ames of the regional workshop nearest to you: Workshop Calendar (pdt') Return to DOS Homepaqe I About the DOS I Apalications I DOS AccessibiliW Statement I DOS Privacy Statement I Disclaimer I Contact Us http://www.dos.state, ny.us/communityprojects/grantprogramdetails.htm 7/20/2009 Page 1 of 2 Burke, Meaghan From: Ten'y, Mark Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:46 PM To: Burke, Meaghan Subject: FW: [Phase_ll_LI] New York State Department of State Environmental ProtectionFund Another Mark Terry Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (631) 765-1938 Mark. Terry(~,town.southold.n¥.us From: Phase_ILH@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Phase_[LH@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eileen Keenan Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:57 PM To: Phase_ILL[@ya hoogroups.com Subject: [Phase_ILL[] New York State Department of State Environmental ProtectionFund Projects eligible for funding through the New York State Department of State Environmental Protection Fund include, among others: - LWRP (Sept 16th) - Shared Services and Local Govt Efficiency (LGE) (Sept 23rd) - Local Gov't Efficiency High Priority (multiple deadlines) Please see below link for more information on all of the grants: http://www.dos.state.ny.us/communityproiects/grantprogramdetails.htm AS NOTED EARLIER: Please also be advised that the New York State Department of State is holding a workshop on its EPF grants on July 20th at the Perry Dm'yea State Office Building in Hauppauge from 9:00 to 2:00. Information on the meeting can be found at: http://www.nyswateH¥onts.com/downloads/PDFS/July2009Calendar.pdf Messages in this topic ( I ) Reply (via web post) I Start a new topic Messaoe~ I Files I Photos I Link~ I Calendar MARKETPLACE Mom Power: Discover the community of moms doin9 more for their families, for the world and for each other Chanoe set-tines via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via emaih Switch deliver,/to Daily Diqest I Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group I Yahoo! GrouPs Terms of Use I Unsubscribe RECENT ACTIVZTY 7/20/2009 Burke, Mea~han Sent: To: Subject: Terry, Mark Friday, July 17, 2009 3:49 PM Burke, Meaghan FW: NYSDOS EPF Grants-Due Sept 16/23, 2009 Meaghan, See that Hugh knows about this. Mark Terry Principal Planner LWRp Coordinator Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (631) 765-1938 Mark.Terry@town.southold.ny.us ..... Original Message ..... From: Laura Stephenson [mailto:lbstephe~k3w.dec.state.ny.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:55 AM To: highwaysuper@aol.com; Alan Svoboda; Bob Ghosio; Angel Dybas; cfs3@cornell.edu; Chris Pickerell; Gregg Rivara; lb66@cornell.edu; Mark Cappellino; rjw38@cornell.edu; Rory MacNish; Steve Schott; drew~dbb-pe.com; Greg Capobianco; Bob DeLuca; Jennifer Skilbred; Seth Ausubel; balla.richard@epa.gov; Richard Balla; Tom Halavik; johncarroll31@~mail.com; d.abatelli@greenportvillage.org; D_NYCE@greenportvillage.org; Anthony Leung; Charles deQuillfeldt; Eileen Keenan; Karen Chytalo; Laura Stephenson; Lisa Tettelbach; Melissa Albino; William Spitz; Lynn Mendelman; thogue@hospitalreceivables.com; Ed Bausman; Bethany Bearmore; Jack Mattice; Robert Cerrato; corwin@optonline.net; Mike Domino; nhvmayor@optonline.net; Peggy Dickerson; Kevin McAllister; Sumner Pingree; Pam Greene; Barbara Blass; Christine Fetten; hanley@riverheadli.com; Chris Kempner; mccormick@riverheadli.com; testa@riverheadli.com; woodson@riverheadli.com; dpw@sagharborny.gov; ldowd@shelterislandtown.us; preich@shelterislandtown.us; tmontant@shelterislandtown.us; matt@shermanec.com; Dawn Ver Hague; Joseph Lombardo; Luke Ormand; mcollins@southamptontownny.gov; DeWitt.Davies@suffolkcountyny.gov; Emily Fogarty; erik.bergey@suffolkcountyny.gov; keneib~;@suffolk¢ountyny.gov; Kim Paulsen; Martin.Trent@suffolkcountyny.gov; Phil DeBlasi; Vito Minei; Walter Dawydiak; william.hillman@suffolkcountyny.gov; David Bergen; Kevin McDonald; lbavaro@TNC.ORG; mbortman@TNC.ORG; Nicole Maher; Wayne Grothe; bfrank@Town. East-Hampton.NY.US; jaldred@Town. East-Hampton.NY.US; Jennifer Gaites; jhalsey@Town. East-Hampton. NY.US; Kevin Ahearn; Lisa D'Andrea; Larry Penny; Mark Abramson; mcary@Town. East-Hampton. NY.US; ttalmage@Town. East-Hampton. NY.US; Julie Kranz; mshea@town.southampton.ny.us; wbnndy@town.southampton.ny.us; Cusack, Heather; Lanza, Heather; Richter, Jamie; Sepenoski, John; Terry, Mark; East Hampton Trustees; mike@widowsholeoysters.com Subject: NYSDOS EPF Grants- Due Sept 16/23, 2009 FYI- funds for water quality projects, stormwater project (e.g. collaborative joint municipal stormwater projects), and habitat projects. This time Environmental Protection Fund grants from New York State Department of State. Includes, among others: - LWRP (Sept 16th) - Shared Services and Local Govt Efficiency (LGE) (Sept 23rd) - LGE High Priority (multiple deadlines) Please see below link for more information on all of the grants: http://www.dos.state.ny.us/communityprojects/grantprogramdetails.htm Please also be advised that NYSDOS is holding a workshop on its EPF grants on July 20th at the Perry Duryea State Office Building in Hauppauge from 9:00 to 2:00. Information on the meeting can be found at: http://www.nyswaterfronts.com/downloads/PDFS/July2OOgCalendar.pdf Laura B. Stephenson Peconic Estuary Program Coordinator NYSDEC, Bureau of Marine Resources 205 N Belle Meade Road, Suite 1 East Setauket, NY 11733 Tel: 631.444.0871 Fax: 631.444.0474 lbstephe@gw.dec.state.ny.us Burke, Mea~han From: Sent: To: Subject: Terry, Mark Friday, July 17, 2009 3:50 PM Burke, Meaghan FW: NYSDEC Round 10 WQIP 2009 WQIP Round 10 Application... Meaghan, Another grant possibility. Mark Terry Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (631) 765-1938 Mark. Terry@town.southold.ny.us ..... Original Message ..... From: Laura Stephenson [mailto:lbstephe@gw.dec.state.ny.us] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:32 PM To: Richter, Jamie; Terry, Mark Subject: Fwd: NYSDEC Round 10 WQIP Hi Jamie & Mark, AS you know by now, NYSDEC Round 10 WQIP Program is open until Oct 16. There is a lot of money for stormwater/Phase II implementation, nonpoint source mgmt, etc. I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't personally urge the Town of Southold to apply. Not only is Southold a new Phase II community and likely in need of funding to get your regulated stormwater program up-and running, but Southold has the most TMDL waterbodies in the entire Peconic Estuary. Estuary watersheds get more points, projects in or discharging to TMDL waterbody watersheds (especially those closed to shellfishing) get more points, etc. Tiering/phasing/dividing areas in applications a good practice. There is considerably more money for coastal areas this time around. When in doubt submit- once your apps are competitively scored, they generally remain in the system if additional funding becomes available. When scoring, we use the sheets included in the back of the "Info for applicants" documents so there are no surprises when it comes to scoring. This round was suppose to be issued a few years ago- so don't bank on Round 11 coming anytime soon. Take advantage of this. Laura Burke, Mea~han From: Sent: To: Cc: SubJect: Susan Van Patten [sevanpat@gw.dec.state.ny.us] Thursday, July 02, 2009 3:12 PM Alan Fuchs; Andrea Dzierwa; Bill Wasilauski; Dixon Rollins; Gerard Palumbo; Glenn Milstrey; James Burke; Jack McKeon; James Tierney; Jim Dezolt; Joseph DiMura; Luci Collins; Mark Klotz; Robert EIburn; Steve Botsford; Thomas Rudolph; William Spitz Eileen Murphy; Sandi Allen 2009 WQIP Round 10 Application being accepted - DeadlineOctober 16, 2009 Importance: High ** High Priority ** Applications for the 2009 Water Quality Improvement Projects Program, Round l0 are now available. Application materials may be downloaded from the Department website at: http://www.dec.ny.gov/pubs/56080.html. On the website you will find the following documents: * 2009 Water Quality Improvement Projects Program Round l0 Information for Applicants * 2009 Water Quality Improvement Projects Program Round 10 Application for State Assistance Payments Applications must be postmarked by October 16, 2009. In an effort to make the program more green we will not be sending out hard copies of the application materials. However, please contact us at (518) 402-8267 if you are unable to download the documents and we can provide a hard copy of the application materials. New for Round 10 * The budget language has been amended to allow eligible applicants to apply for wastewater treatment improvement projects * Hardship funding will be made available only for wastewater treatment improvement projects * Smart Growth and Energy Efficiency will be a consideration for all Round 10 projects * Projects implementing Green Infrastructure practices are eligible for funding under the following project types: municipal wastewater treatment, combined sewer overflows (CSOs), nonpoint source pollution abatement and municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4). Susan Van Patten, Partnership Section Chief NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Partnership Section 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-3500 (518) 402-8240 (voice) (518 402-9029 (fax) sevanpat@gw.dec.state.ny.us New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Director, Region One Stony Brook University 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, New York 11790 - 3409 Phone: (631) 4~.4~0345 · FAX: (631)444-0349 Website: www. dec. state.ny.us Alexander B. Grannis Commissioner March 23, 2009 NOAA Coastal and Marine Habitat Restoration Project Grants under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 FFO~ NOAA-NMFS=HCPO-2009-2001709 To Whom It May Concern: I write now in support of the Coastal Steward Adopt - A- Boach Program. The Coastal Stewardship organization has demonstrated a proven ability to coordinate the efforts of local organizations, government agencies and concerned citizens to remove debris and eliminate blight conditions on local beaches. The Coastal Steward's Adopt - Beach Program can be of significant value in working to protect the environment. Sincerely, P~ SCULLY Regional.~)irector PAS; jam Burke, Mea~han From: Sent: To: Subject: Coastal Steward [coastalsteward@optonline.net] Monday, July 13, 2009 5:08 PM Burke, Meaghan Re: Goldsmiths Clean Up I have asked my insurance agent to get on it (for the third time). You can get the letters of support from the website. If you want me to make copies and send them let me know, Dave ..... Original Message ..... From: "Burke, Meaghan" <meaghan.burke@town.southold.ny.us> TO: "Coastal Steward" <coastalsteward@optonline.net> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:25 PM Subject: Goldsmiths Clean Up > Greetings Captain Dave Johnson, > I have not yet received your three letters of recommendation in the mail > nor the addendum stating that the Town of Southold has been added to the > liability insurance. Please send this information to me as soon as > possible since the clean-up on July 26 is fast approaching. Thank you! > > Sincerely, > Meaghan Burke Burke, Mea~han From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Coastal Steward [coastalsteward@optonline.net] Wednesday, June 24, 2009 8:06 AM Burke, Meaghan Hugh & Susan Switzer; Sepenoski, John; Beltz, Phillip; Reeves, Ken; scottrussel@town.southold.ny, us; allenkraus@hotmail.com; Roxanne Zimmer; Lillian Ball; grigonis@hotmail.com Re: Goldsmiths Clean Up 1. Congressman Goldsmith Inlet, Tim Bishop Lett... Southold 009 .... 2. Assemblyman Coastal Steward Steve Englebrig... 2009b Schedule... Hi Meaghan. I have to apoligize for taking so long to get back to you, I have been dealing with some personal issues. I'm attaching some letters of support, and the flyer for the beach cleanup. I am having the Town of Southold added to the 2 million dollar liability insurance and will forward a copy of the addendum as soon as it is received. The game plan is as follows: The town is providing 2 dumpsters, one will be placed at the north side of Goldsmith Pond on Sound View Ave by the entrance to the dirt road leading to the pond (my truck will bring the large items from the pond edge to the dumpster), the other will be placed by the little cove area were I met you on Mill Rd. The town will also supply a vacuum truck with as much hose as possible, to suck up the small pieces of plastic that have concentrated there. The Coastal Steward will solicit volunteers (networking with environmental groups, newspaper ads scouting groups etc), direct the cleanup, document the debris removed, provide customized certificates of appreciation to the volunteers and sponsor (Group to Save Goldsmith Inlet). Since the site is in such bad shape, I feel the first cleanup should deal with getting the larger man-made items (we only take man-made items out) out first using the stronger volunteers while the younger/older volunteers can work on removing the smaller items (bottles, wrappers etc). This is how we normally attack the problem. The next cleanup will involve our boats, getting to as much of the shore line as possible. I focus on the worst areas first. We are never sure how many volunteers will show up, it depends on the weather and other factors, but we average around 30 per cleanup. I hope this answers all of your questions, if it didn't feel free to contact me. I am really looking forward to this cleanup. I lived on Sound View Rd back in 1981 about a half a mile from Goldsmiths Inlet and frankly I was devistated when I saw how bad it is. Thank you, Captain Dave Johnson, Coastal Steward. 1 Coastal Steward 2009 Schedule 6 Audrey Six, Port Jefferson Station, NY 1177 www coastalsteward,or9 coastalsteward@opton/ine,p, et phone(516) 946-6560 Beach Cleanups: 5/9 Mt. Sinai Harbor/Long Island Sound meet at the parking lot next to the playground on the east side of Cedar Beach 9 am- 3 pm 5/17 Jones Beach (West End Beach - bay side, park at boat basin, next to Coast Guard Station) 9 am - 1 pm 6/14 Flax Pond - meet at the SUNY SB Marine Lab, 9 am - 3 pm 6/28 West Meadow Beach - Stony Brook 9 am - 3 pm 7/26 Goldsmith Inlet - Southold 9 am - 3 pm 9/12th, 13th and 19th Port Jefferson Harbor/Long Island Sound 9 am - 3 pm (meet at the end of Anchorage Rd., Belle Terre) 9~20 Miller Piace/Long Island Sound meet at the west end of Seacliff Lane, Miller Place 9 am - 2 pm 9/26 Louse Beach - East Hampton meet at the parking lot at the end of Louse Pt. Rd, Barnes Hole. (on Gardiners Bay) 9 am - 3 pm 10111 Mt. Sinai Harbor (Port Jefferson side) meet at the cul de sac at Crystal Brook Hollow Rd., Port Jefferson 9am - 1 pm Shellfish Restoration: Every other Saturday, meet at Mt. Sinai Harbor - Town Parks Dept, Harbor Beach Rd. (at the pump out dock/Bay Constable dock) 9 am- 3 pm Starting 6/13, 6127, 7111, 7/25, 818, 8122, 9/5, 9/19, 10/10, 10/24 Fact Sheet 2.5 - Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Minimum Control Measure PaTe 2 What Is Required? Recognizing the adverse effects illicit discharges can have on receiving waters, the Phase I1 Final Rule requires an operator of a regulated small MS4 to develop, implement and enfome an illicit discharge de~ction and elimination program. This program must include the following: A storm sewer system map, showing the location of all outfalls and the names and location of all waters of the United States that receive discharges from those ouffalls; Through an ordinance, or other regulatory mechanism, a prehibition (to the extent allowable under State, Tribal, or local law) on non-stormwater discharges into the MS4, and appropriate enforcement procedures and actions; A plan to detect and address non-stormwater discharges, including illegal dumping, into the MS4; The education of ppblic employees, businesses, and the general public about the hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste; and The determination of appropriate best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. Some program implementation approaches, BMPs (i.e., the program actions/activities), and measurable goals are suggested below. Does This Measure Need to Address Ail Illicit Discharges? No. The illicit discharge detection and elimination program does not need to address the following categories of non-stormwater discharges or flov~ unless the operator of the regulated small MS4 identifies them as significant contributors of pollutants to its MS4: Water line flushing; Landscape irrigation; Diverted stream flows; Rising ground waters; Uncontaminated ground water inftltration; Uncontaminated pumped ground water; Discharges from potable water sources; Foundation drains; Air conditioning condensation; Irrigation water; Springs; Water from crawl space pumps; 121 Footing drains; 0 Lawn watering; [21 Individual residential car washing; IZI Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands; ~ I)echlorinated swimming pool discharges; and 121 SUeet wash water. What Are Some Guidelines for Developing and Implementing This Measure? The objective of the illicit discharge detection and elimination minimum control measure is to have regulated small MS4 operators gain a thorough awareness of their systems. This awareness allows them to determine the types and sources of iflieit discharges entering their system; and establish the legal, technical, and educational means needed to eliminate these discharges. Permittees could meet these objectives in a variety of ways depending on their individual needs and abilities, but soma general guidance for each requirement is provided below. The storm sewer system map is meant to demonstrate~ awareness of the intake and discharge areas of the systom. It is needed to help deteninne the extent of discharged dry weather flows, the possible sources of the dry weather flows, and the particular watefoodies these flows may be'affecting. An existing map, such as a topographical map, on which the location of major pipes and ouffalls can be clearly presented demonstrates such awareness. EPA recommends collecting all existing information on ouffall locations (e.g., review city records, drainage maps, storm draia maps), and then conducting field surveys to verify locations. It probably will be necessary to walk (i.e., wade through smell receiving watew or use a boat for larger waters) the streamhanks and shorelines for visual observation. More ' than one trip may be needed to locale all outfalls, j Legal Prohibition and Enforcement EPA recognizes that some permiuees may have limited authority under State, Tribal or local law to establish and enforce an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism prohibiting illicit discharges. In such a case, the permittee is encouraged to obtain the necessary authority, if possible. The Plan The plan to detect and add. ss illicit discharges is the central component of this minimum control measure. The plan is dependant upon several factors, includ'mg the permittee's available resources, size of staff, and degree and character of its illicit discharges. As guidance only, the four steps of a recommended plan are outlined below: SOUTHOLD TOWN STORMWATER STRUCTURE INVENTORY - CATCH BASINS Cleaning Cond: z'~ ~ St:a~ling Water. Oomme.ts: ,~) H 1° O~ ~5~0~ Structure Type: ~ ~t, ~.?:::~ Depth: # of Grates: ~,~- ~ ~''~ G/C Cond: Structure Cf:. Out'rail ~ Structure Type: Structure Cond: G/C Type: # of Grates: Cleaning Cend: Standing Water. Pipes: Depth: G/C Cond: Comments: Structure #: Outfail ~ Structure Type: Structure Cond: GIG Type: # of Grates: Cleaning Cond:. Standing Water: Pipes: Comments: Depth: GIC Cond: Structure fl: Outfall #: Structure Type: Structure Cond: GIC Type:. # of Grates: Cleaning Cond: Standing Water: Pipes: Comments: Depth:. G/C Cond: Structure #: Out'fall ~ Structure Type: Structure Cond: GIG Type: # of Gra[es: Cleaning Cond: Standln~ Water Pipes: Depth: GIC Cond: SOUTHOLD TOWN STORMWATER STRUCTURE INVENTORY - CATCH BASINS structure Cond: ~C Type: Cleaning Cond: St~J~ture Cond:. ~ Cleaning Cond: ~ [--(~ '~ ~3[Depth: #of Grates: I ~:~- GIC Co.d: '~--~ Ou~all~ S~u~ureType: ~~ Y Depth: 0~11 * *ru~.,* Type: ~ U ~ ~ De,h: G/CType:~ I~ ~o~G~es: ~ [ on . T~,*~ ~ ' f ' Cleaning Cond: ~ Standing W. ater. "9-~ ~'' , Pipes: __.~:l ~ ~ Stature Cond: ~ GIC Type: ~ ~ ~of Gra,~: ~ I ~ X q GIC Co.d: Oleaning Oond: ~ S~ndlng Watec ~ Pipes: ~ ~ ~ Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 3-27-2007 by L.L. No. 9-2007. Amendments noted where applicable.] GENERAL REFERENCES Coastal erosion hazard areas - See Ch. III. Environmental quality review - See Ch. 130. Flood damage prevention -- See Ch. 148. Soil removal -- See Ch. 228. Subdivision of land - See Ch. 240. Wetlands -- See Ch. 275. Zoning -- See Ch. 280. § 236-1. Title. Th~s chapter shall be known as the Stormwater, Grading and Drmnage Control Law. § 236-2. Statutory authorization. This chapter is enacted pursuant to § 10 of the Municipal Home Rule Law to promote the public health, safety and general welfare of Town citizens through land use regulations intended to control flooding, erosion or sedimentation within the entire Town. The variance provisions of this chapter shall supersede any inconsistent portions of Town Law § 267-a and govern the subject of variances in this chapter. § 236-3. Purpose. It is the purpose of this chapter to promote and protect, to the greatest extent practicable, the public health, safety and general welfare by: A. Minimizing soil erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff; B. Controlling, restricting or prohibiting activities which alter natural drainage systems, floodplains, stream channels and natural protective features, including wetlands, which contribute to the accommodation of floodwaters and retention of sediment; C. Controlling, restricting or prohibiting land use activities which increase nonpoint source pollution due to stormwater runoff, and/or which result in discharge onto public lands, Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows neighboring properties or natural protective features; D. Assuring that land and water uses in the Town are designed and/or conducted using best-management practices to control flooding, stormwater runoff and discharge onto public lands, neighboring properties or natural protective features; and E. Promoting the recharge of stormwater into the freshwater aquifer to protect the drinking water supply and minimize saltwater intrusion. § 236-4. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: AGRICULTURE -- The production, keeping or maintenance, for sale, lease or personal use, of all plants and animals useful to man, including but not limited to forages and sod crops; grains and seed crops; dairy animals and dairy products; pgultry and poultry products; livestock, including beef cattle, sheep, swine, horses, ponies, mules or goats or any mutation of hybrids thereof, including the breeding and grazing of any or all of such animals; bees and apiary products; fur animals; fruits of all kinds, including grapes, nuts and berries, vegetables; floral, ornamental and greenhouse products; or lands devoted to a soil conservation or forestry management program. BEST-MANAGEMENT PRACTICE -- Procedures and methods pertaining to construction activities which are intended to prevent stormwater runoff, retain valuable topsoil and minimize water pollution. BUILDING INSPECTOR -- The persons(s) appointed by the Town Board to enforce the provisions of Southold Code Chapter 280 and this chapter. CLEAN FILL -- Naturally deposited earthen material from an approved upland borrow source. CONSTRUCTION -- The siting, building, erection, extension, or material alteration of any structure the use of which requires permanent or tempora~ location on the ground, as well as the installation of any hardened surfaces at or below grade. DEVELOPMENT -- Any man-made change to improved or unimproved real property, including but not limited to any construction activities, the construction of buildings or other structures, creating access to and circulation within the site, clearing of vegetation, grading, providing utilities and other services, parking facilities, drainage systems, methods of sewage disposal and other services, and creating landforms. Development also includes significant alteration of natural resources in preparation for development, such as the dredging or filling of wetlands, ponds or other natural drainage areas. 2 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows DISCHARGE -- To emit, expel, pour, direct or otherwise cause the flow of liquid in a manner other than the natural course of that liquid which existed prior to the disturbance of the natural state of the land upon which it flowed, if any. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS -- Includes gutters, swales, pipes, conduits and superstructures (e.g., drywells, sumps, berms, etc.) for the collection and conduction of stormwater to an adequate facility for its storage and disposal. EROSION -- The wearing away of land as a result of the action of natural forces or man-related activities. EROSION, SEDIMENTATION AND STORMWATER RUNOFF CONTROL PLAN -- A drawing showing the proposed use of the site and the methods, techniques and improvements, both during and after construction, that will be employed to control erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff, which shall employ best-management practices. Where the nature of the existing conditions and proposed activities warrant, the Building Inspector may require that such plan be prepared by a registered design professional licensed in the State of New York. EXCAVATION -- The removal, addition, or alteration of soil, sand, or vegetation by digging, dredging, drilling, cutting, scooping, or hollowing out. FILLING -- The deposition of natural or artificial material so as to modify the surface or subsurface conditions of upland or underwater land. GRADING -- The excavation, filling or alteration of the surface or subsurface conditions of land, lakes, ponds, or watercourses. ILLICIT DISCHARGES -- Include but are n6t limited to discharge of solid waste; human and animal waste; antifreeze, oil, gasoline, grease and all other automotive products; flammable or explosive materials; metals in excess of naturally occurring amounts, whether in liquid or solid form; chemicals not normally found in uncontaminated water; solvents and degreasers; painting products; drain cleaners; commercial and household cleaning materials; pesticides; herbicides; fertilizers; acids; alkalis; ink; steam-cleaning waste; laundry waste; soap; detergent ammonia; chlorine; chlorinated swimming pool or hot-tub water; domestic or sanitary sewage; roof structure runoff; animal carcasses; food and food waste; yard waste; dirt; sand; and gravel. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE -- Any surface exposed to stormwater from which water runs off and cannot pass through, including but not limited to structures, paving, paving blocks, bedding material, packed earth, treated surfaces, roof structures, patios, decking, stoops, porches, and accessory structures. MUNICIPAL PERMIT -- Any permit, grant, approval, license, certificate or other authorization issued by the Town of Southold, including but not limited to permits for building, grading, Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows demolition, clearing and excavation and subdivision and site plan approvals. NATURAL DRAINAGE -o The stormwater runoff patterns resulting from topographical and geological surface conditions, prior to clearing, regrading or construction. NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE -- A nearshore area, beach, bluff, dune or wetland and the vegetation thereon. NATURAL WATERCOURSE -- The route farmed by natural processes, topography and geology leading to a natural watershed. NATURAL WATERSHED o- An area of land which, in its natural state and prior to any man-made change, and due to its topography and geology, drains to a particular location within that area. ONE-HUNDRED-YEAR FLOODPLAIN -- The land area subject to the highest level of flooding that, on the average, is likely to occur once every 100 years (i.e., that has a one-percent chance of occurring each year), as said level is shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps on file in the Southold Town Building Department. RESPONSIBLE PARTY -- Owners and occupants of premises, applicants for municipal permits, and any other person or entity contributing to an act regulated by this chapter. SEDIMENTATION -- The processes that operate at or near the surface of the ground to deposit soils, debris and other materials either on other ground surfaces or in water channels. SITE PREPARATION -- The activities of stripping, clearing, grubbing, excavating, filling, and grading to facilitate construction or other use of the land. STORMWATER RUNOFF -- That part of precipitation that flows over the land surface. STRIPPING -- The process of mechanically scraping away topsoil. STRUCTURE -- Any object constructed, erected, installed or placed on land or in water, including buildings, sheds, mobile homes, tanks, bulkheads, piers and docks and any additions or alterations thereto. TOPSOIL -- The uppermost layer of soil, usually the top 15 to 20 centimeters, it having the highest concentration of organic matter and microorganisms, and where most of the Earth's biological soil activity occurs. § 236-5. Applicability. 4 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows This chapter shall apply to all property within the Town of Southold and shall govern: A. All grading, drainage and erosion control, whether or not a permit is required; B. All new or replaced impervious surface and all land disturbing activities, whether or not a permit is required; C. All discharges directly or indirectly to a highway or public right-of-way, public drainage control system, neighboring property, wetland or public waterway; and D. All new and existing land uses within the Town. § 236-6. Discharges. All discharges within the Town are subject to this chapter unless explicitly exempted. Conduct exempted from this chapter include activities necessary for the conduct of agricultural uses in connection with a bona fide agricultural operation. § 236-7. Prohibited discharges. The following discharges are prohibited: A. Discharges to public highways and rights-of-way. B. Discharges to tidal and freshwater wetlands, bluffs, dunes, beaches and other natural protective features as defined in Chapter 275 of this Town Code. C. Discharges from private properties to adjoining properties, without express permission. D. Discharges to public drainage control systems and networks, without express permission. E. Discharges of illicit liquids to any of the areas listed above and any other area within the Town, except in accordance with facilities approved for the handling of such materials by the Town, County and/or state. § 236-8. Requirements for all stormwater discharges. For all stormwater discharges, responsible parties shall implement and maintain operational source controls to include but not be limited to: A. Installation of drainage control structures to contain and recharge all runoff generated by Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows development. B. Maintaining private roads, streets, driveways, parking lots and walkways. C. Identifying and eliminating unauthorized connections to Town drainage control systems and public rights-of-way. D. Maintaining and protecting natural drainage patterns. E. Maintaining and protecting natural watersheds. § 236-9. Requirements for all land-disturbing activities or impervious surfaces. All land-disturbing activities or addition or replacement of impervious surfaces shall provide temporary and permanent construction controls and shall be requiredto contain a two-inch rainfall on site, even where a drainage control permit is not required under this chapter. All applicants for municipal permits shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector that the proposed activities can meet this standard, either by the installation of gutters, leaders, drywells or other measures, prior to the issuance of such a municipal permit. § 236-10. Activities requiring drainage control permit. A. None of the following activities shall be undertaken until a drainage control permit has been issued under the provisions of this chapter. (1) Grading or stripping which affects more than 5,000 square feet of ground surface. (2) Excavation or filling involving more than 200 cubic yards of material within any parcel or any contiguous area. (3) Site preparation on slopes which exceed 10 feet of vertical rise to 100 feet of horizontal distance. (4) Site preparation within 100 feet of wetlands, beach, \\bluffor coastal erosion hazard area. (5) Site preparation within the one-hundred-year floodplain of any watercourse. B. The following activities shall be exempted from such review: (1) Minor clearing or excavation work not incident to a substantial change in the existing use of the land, which may be reasonably expected i~ot to contribute to any additional on-site-generated runoff or degradation of any lands or water beyond the boundaries of 6 Town of SouthoM PC/Codebook for Windows the property involved. (2) Emergency repairs on public or private objects, necessary for the preservation of life, health or property, or taken to implement and accomplish the beneficial purpose of this chapter as set forth herein under such circumstances where it would be impracticable to obtain approval prior to making such emergency repairs. Following such an emergency situation, however, any approvals required by this chapter shall be obtained. (3) Routine maintenance or repair work on public or private roads or utility line rights-of-way where interim and permanent stormwater runoff control measures will be undertaken. To the maximum extent practicable, vegetation shall be used as a stabilizer and method of filtering and slowing stormwater flow from road surfaces. (4) Pervious structures, e.g., open decks, where the removal of topsoil allows for the recharge of groundwater. § 236-11. Compliance. A. Where a drainage control permit is required by this chapter, all development, construction, excavation and landscaping activities shall be conducted in accordance with an approved erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff control plan, and all other requirements of this chapter. B. Where a Trustee permit, subdivision plat or site plan approval has been obtained and drainage has been addressed, the Building Inspector may consider such approval in satisfaction of these requirements, except that all development on individual lots in an approved subdivision shall remain subject to these requirements on an individual basis. § 236-12. Application process. A. Any applicant for a municipal permit to conduct a development, construction or excavation activity within the Town of Southold shall complete a stormwater assessment form to assist in determining compliance with this chapter. Applicants that meet the threshold set forth above and require a drainage control permit shall also submit an erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff control plan to the Building Inspector. B. Upon receipt by the Building Inspector of any application for a drainage control permit to conduct any activity regulated by this chapter, the Building InSPector may refer the proposed erosion, sedimentation, and stormwater runoff control plan to the Town Engineering Department for comment and recommendation. No municipal permit that shall be issued for activities requiring a drainage control permit, nor shall any application therefor be deemed 7 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows complete, until the Building Inspector has first issued his or her approval of the erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff control plan. C. Such plan may contain the following elements, which may be integrated into a site plan or subdivision plat submitted for approval pursuant to applicable Town law: (1) A vicinity map drawn to a scale of not less than 2,000 feet to one inch showing the relationship of the site to its general surroundings. (2) A plan of the site drawn to a scale of not less than 100 feet to the inch showing the location and description of property boundaries, site acreage, existing natural and man-made features on and within 500 f~et of the site boundary, including roads, structures, water sources, drainage structures, utilities, topography including existing contours with intervals of not more than five feet where the slope is 10% or greater and not more than two feet where the slope is less than 10%, soil characteristics, location of wooded areas, the depth to seasonal high water table and a copy of the Soil Conservation District soil survey where available. (3) Location and description of proposed changes to the site and existing development on the site, which includes: (a) All excavation, filling, stripping and grading proposed to be undertaken, identified as to the depth, volume, and nature of the materials involved; (b) All areas requiring clearing, identified as to the nature of vegetation affected; (c) All areas where topsoil is to be removed and stockpiled and Where topsoil is to be ultimately placed; (d) All temporary and permanent vegetation to be placed on the site, identified as to planting type, size, and extent; (e) All temporary and permanent stormwater runoff control measures, including soil stabilization techniques and stormwater drainage and storage systems, including ponds, recharge and sediment basins (identified as to the type of facility, the materials from which it is constructed, its dimensions, and its capacity in cubic feet); (f) The anticipated pattern of surface drainage during periods of peak runoff, upon completion of site preparation and construction activities, identified as to rate and direction of flow at all major points within the drainage system; (g) The location of all roads, driveways, sidewalks, structures, utilities, and other improvements; and Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows (h) The final contours of the site at intervals of no greater than two feet. (4) A schedule of the sequence of installation of planned soil erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff control measures as related to the progress of the project, including anticipated starting and completion dates. § 236-13. Performance standards for approval of erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff control plans. A. The site erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff control measures shall be appropriate for existing topography, vegetation and other salient natural features of the site. The plan shall indicate that the development will preserve natural features, minimize grading and cut and fill operations, ensure conformity with natural topography, and retain natural vegetation and trees to the maximum extent practicable in order to create the least erosion potential and . handle adequately the volume and rate or velocity, of surface water runoff. B. Site grading, excavation and filling shall minimize destruction of natural vegetation, the potential for erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff and the threat to the health, safety and welfare of neighboring property owners and the general public. C. Erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff shall be controlled prior to, during, and after site preparation and construction. During grading operations, appropriate measures for dust control shall be undertaken. D. Areas exposed by site preparation shall be protected during site construction with hay bales, temporary vegetation and/or mulching to meet the requirements of the NYSDEC SPDES program in effect. E. Natural drainage patterns shall be protected and incorporated into site design. Where natural drainage patterns are demonstrated to be adversely affecting a beach or wetland, drainage patterns may be altered in a manner which reduces the threat to such beach or wetland and does not create other flooding or erosion problems. F. Site preparation, including stripping of vegetative cover and grading, shall be undertaken so that no individual building site is stripped of its vegetation cover more than 30 days prior to commencement of construction. Soils exposed or disturbed by site preparation shall remain so for the shortest practical period of time during site clearing, construction and restoration. G. Disturbed soils shall be stabilized and revegetated or seeded as soon as practicable. During the interim, erosion protection measures such as temporary vegetation, retention ponds, recharge basins, berming, silt traps and mulching shall be used to ensure that sedimentation is 9 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows minimized and mitigated. H. In no case shall stormwater be diverted to another property either during site preparation or after development. In appropriate cases, with the approval of the Superintendent of Highways, drainage control measures may be implemented in the right-of-way attendant to an adjacent Town highway, at the applicant's expense. I. During the construction period, disposal of stormwater runoff generated by development activity shall be handled on site. Baling, mulching, debris basins, silt traps, use of fibrous cover materials or similar measures shall be used to contain soil erosion on the site. J. All projects, regardless of the area of groundwater removal and/or grading, shall retain a natural vegetative buffer zone along water bodies, including wetlands and marshes, if one is imposed by the Board of Trustees. If necessary, other forms of erosion control measures will also be included. Natural land features such as shallow depressions shall be used, wherever possible, to collect stormwater on-site for recharge. Site designs shall minimize impermeable paving. Stormwater runoff shall not be directly discharged to surface waters, marshes and wetlands. Stormwater pollutants shall not be discharged directly into a wetland, but shall be attenuated by using holding ponds, sedimentation basins, perimeter berming, vegetated buffer areas and other measures that reduce flow velocity and increase storage time. Pollutants shall not be discharged into wetlands. In addition,' any filtering devices constructed as part of the drainage system must be adequately maintained in order to function properly. All wetland vegetation shall be maintained. Dredging and site construction should not disturb wetlands either by direct removal of vegetation or substrate, or by the alteration of adjacent slopes that would undermine the stability of the substrate unless permission is obtained from the Board of Trustees. Grading equipment shall not be allowed to enter into or cross any watercourse or wetland. Subsurface sediments shall be maintained to provide structural support for the soils of the wetlands. The elevation of a wetland shall not be altered. No vegetation required by any agency as a buffer to a natural protective feature shall be disturbed by grading, erosion, sedimentation, or direct removal of vegetation. Fill shall not encroach on natural watercourses, constructed channels, wetlands, or floodway areas. All fill shall be compacted at a final angle of repose which provides stability for the 10 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Vfindows material, minimizes erosion and prevents settlement. S. Trails and walking paths along water bodies shall be sited and constructed so they are not a source of sediment, subject to the approval of the Board of Trustees. T. The amount and velocity ofmnofffrom a site after development shall approximate its predevelopment characteristics. However, if the site is adjacent to coastal waters, stormwater shall be contained on-site, to the maximum extent practicable, to prevent direct discharge of runoff to coastal waters. U. Natural floodplains and major drainage swales shall not be altered or disturbed in a manner which decreases their ability to accommodate and channel stormwater runoff and floodwaters. If no practicable alternative to the location of development, roadway, driveways, and similar surfaces within these areas exists, such facilities shall be sited and.constructed to minimize and mitigate the amount and velocity of stormwater entering the channel, floodplain or swale and to approximate the original functions of the undisturbed condition. V. No land having a slope equal to or greater than 20% shall be developed or disturbed except for conservation measures or measures intended to remove debris which inhibits the functioning of the swale, except accessways to shorelines approved by the Board of Trustees shall be permitted. Natural vegetation and topography shall be retained to stabilize soils and reduce the volume of stormwater overflow. W. On lands having slopes of less than 20%, but composed of highly erodible soils, development proposals shall include consideration of the load-bearing capacity of the soils. Unless it can be demonstrated that the soils can be stabilized with a minimum of on-site disturbance and no adverse impacts to the stability of neighboring properties, the development proposal shall not be approved as submitted. X. All permanent (final) vegetation and mechanical erosion control measures called for in approved plans shall be installed within the time limits specified by the Building Inspector, and no later than the expiration of the municipal permit issued therewith. § 236-14. Approved plans. Plans approved by the Building Inspector in conjunction with the issuance of a drainage control permit shall also be filed with the County Clerk indicating that such plans are binding as against future purchasers, granting the Town permission to enter the property for compliance enforcement purposes, and containing a summary of the plan's requirements. 11 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows § 236-15. Variances. A variance may be granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold upon receipt of an application fi.om a property owner which meets the criteria for an area variance set forth in § 267-a of the Town Law. § 236-16. Inspection; restoration; certificate of occupancy; fines. A. Inspection. Inspection for soil erosion, sedimentation, and mnoffcontrol plan compliance shall be conducted by the Building Inspector to determine that the work has been completed in accordance with such plan. The plan may be modified by mutual agreement if, during or after installation, the Building Inspector deems that the installed measures are not adequate to meet the performance standards or if alternatives would better meet the Code requirements. If no agreement is reached, the Building Inspector may require the submission of a modified plan in order to maintain compliance with this chapter. Restoration. Any clearing, excavation or development of land in violation of this chapter shall be corrected forthwith after written notice by the Building Inspector. In the event that corrective action is not taken as directed within a reasonable time, the Town may, at its own expense, take corrective action to restore the property or initiate legal action to prevent unlawful or unauthorized activity. The cost of restoration shall become a lien upon the property upon which such unlawful activity occurred. Certificate of occupancy. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued by the Building Inspector until all work required to be completed pursuant to the plan has been satisfactorily done. Fines. Any responsible party undertaking clearing, excavation or development of land in violation of this chapter, or falsifying information in connection with the requirements of this chapter, upon conviction, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not less than $500 and not more than $2,000. Such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each day during which a violation of this chapter is committed or continues. Enfomement. The Director of Code Enfomement and/or the Building Inspector are responsible for enfomement of the provisions of this chapter and have the authority to issue violations of this chapter. The Town Attorney shall be responsible for prosecution of any such violations. In addition to the above-provided fines, the Town Board may authorize an action or proceeding in the name of the Town in a court of competent jurisdiction to compel compliance with or to restrain by injunction the violation of this chapter. 12 Terry, Mark From: Phase_ll_Ll@yahoogroups,corn on behalf of Eileen Keenan [emkeenan@gw.dec.state,ny.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:34 PM To: Phase_ll_Ll@yahoogmups,com Subject: [Phase_ll_LI] MS4 Q&A RECENT ACTTVITY Visit Your Group FYI - recently raised Q&A's: Q:Are'pipes draining private property covered under the Phase II program? A:They are covered with regard to their potential to cause an illicit discharge to the municipal separate storm sewer system. Please refer to the MS4 permit (GP-o-oS-oo2), DEC IDDE guidance, and the CWP IDDE manual for discussion of what may be considered an illicit discharge. May be necessary/advisable to monitor such discharges to the storm sewer system particularly w/respect to TMDL pollutants, such as pathogens and nitrogen... Q:For instance, is a regulated MS4 required to map and monitor these discharges? A:The MS4 is required to proactively look for and/or eliminate illicit discharges to their separate storm sewer system. While GP-o-o8-oo2 explicitly requires mapping of MS4 outfalls and interconnections, it may be necessary/advisable to map those areas in need of prioritization for IDDE monitoring/periodic field investigation/inspection, etc. Give Back Yahoo! for Good Get inspired by a good cause. Y! Toolbar Get it Free! easy 1-click access to your groups. Yahoo! Groups Start a group in 3 easy steps. Connect with others. Q:How about if the private homeowner has a pipe draining excess water from his property and this pipe discharges directly to a waterbody, not to the local municipalities storm sewer system? A:The MS4 program addresses discharges to/from the municipal separate strom sewer system. Q:Also, what if this person discharged grey water to this pipe, would it be considered an illicit discharge since it's not going to the storm sewer system? A:Would not be considered an illicit discharge for purposes of the MS4 program. May/may not be a violation of other water quality protection regulations. Eileen Keenan NY Sea Grant NEMO Program Manager NYS DEC Division of Water 50 Circle Road SUNY Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY li79o-34o9 Tele:631-444-o4~ Fax:631-444-o4o7 email:emkeena[~ia~'~gw ~de~ .state my.us http //www,seagra!~t,st!ny~b edu ~'~s-~s in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) I Start a new topic Messages I Fi}es I Photos I (ii,ks [ Calendar 5/13/2009 ~ GROUPS Change settir~gs via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via emaih Switch delivery to Daily Digest ] Switch format to Trqditiona! Visit Your O!:oup I Yahoo! G!oups Terms of Use I ~)!!subsc~:ibe 5/13/2009 SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS ...... ALPHABETICALLy -A- L~ber Pege Alvah's Lane, Cutcbogue F. 63 -F.72 Antler Lane, Cutcho~ue P.260 Aquaview Avenue, East Marion N.306 Angler*s Road, Greenport P.203 A'ldrich~$ Lane, Laurel 1.332-6~ 354-5~ F.66~ F.150-55 Albo Dr lye-Laurel N.451 Aldrich Lane, MAttituck T.332 The Anchorage, Mattituck P.161 I. 4-8 P. 292 P.' 296 Akerly Pond Lane, Southol(] ~%~,~,,~ k~,~)p. 338 AzaLea Road, Mattituck Ese:ares P. 395 Acke=~y Pond Lane - drainage r-o-w {~tham) P467' Anchor ~ne, Southold P 486 C SOUTHOLD TO~.I ROADS--ALPHABETICALLY Bay View Avenue, Arshamomague Bridge Lane, Cutchogue Bayberry Road, Cutchogue Betts Str eet-Cutchogue Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue Broadwaters Drive, Cutchogue Bey Road, Cutchogue Beebe Drive, Cutchogue Brown Street, Greenport Beach Road, Greenport Bennett Road, Greenport Booth Place, Greenport Bay Road, Greenport Bray Avenue, Laurel Bergen Avenue, Mattituck Bridge Neck Road, Mattituck Bayer Road, Mattituck Bayview Road, MAttituck Breakwater Holding Corp. Brower Road, Mattituck Bay Avenue, Mattituck Bay Road, MAttituck Bunny Lane, New Suffolk Bay Avenue,'Orient Broad Hole, Orient Bay Avenue, Peconic Bay Avenue, Peconic Bay Avenue, Peconic Bridge LAne, Peconic Bay Avenue, Peconic Broadwaters , Peconic Bay Home Avenue, Southold Bey View, Southold Beckwith Avenue, Southold Benjamin's LIne,Southold Benjamin's Lane, Southold Boisseau Avenue, Southold Bewery Len.. Birch Road, Southold ' Bridge at Goose Creek, Southold Beachwood Lane, Southold (Southwood) Bayview Avenue, Southold Birch Brive, Laurel Baldwin Place, peco~lcu~ Blllard Road, Best Cutchogue 1[ I IIIII J II Bayshore Road, Arehamc~que Bennett Lane, Southold (Fairview Park) Booth Road, Southold Blossom Bend, Mattituck Estates Beebe Drive Extension, Cutchogue Bay Avenue, Orient, (by User) Breitstadt Court, Southold Bay Haven Lane, Southold Brigantine Drive, Southold Budd's Pond Road, Southold p.158-N. 228 K.171-9 - K.140-1 N.254 N.254 N.361 N. 56 P. 90 P.129 P. 256-P. 260 1.492-502 N. 247-253 F. 140-N. 75 N. 301-151; P.192 N.387 _ N.137' P.120 K.193-99 F.376-80:383-89 1.432-34 N.107 N.133 N.126 P.161 1.302 , 303 K. 9- 192 N. 47 K. 74-5; 479 F.220 K.171-211 K.303-206-140 Z.159;* 561; F.193 N.296 · 1.501 K. 18; 20 K. 305-310-3~3 1.23-25-10 F. 3-C.201-F. 160,188,157 K.201; 1.42-63-97-101-; F.65 F.66-204-51- P.17-110 K.267 P.170 P.158 P.273 P.281 P. 285 P. 289 P.308 P.313 P. 323 P. 395 P. 406 p. 422 P. 429 P. 446 P 486 Q1 Bennett's Pond Lane, Mattituck Q19 SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS. Crossing, deed for dirt, Arshamomaque- Colony Road, Arshamomaque COX~S Lane, Cutchogue Cox~e Lane, Cutchogue Cutchogue to Goldsmith's Creek Cutchogue HArbor,{old) Cutchogue HArbor Road, Cutchogue Carrington Road, Cutchogue Case's Road, Cutchogue Case Road, Cutchogue Cox~s Lane, C~tchogue Cox's Lane, Cutchogue (alteration) Cedar's Road, Cutchogue Case's LAne, Cutchogue Cedar Drive, East MArion Cleaves Point Road, East Marion C~amplin Place, Greenport Clark House, Alley in front of. (Gpt.) Clark Street, Gree~port Creek To Greenport Cox's Lane, Mattituck Cox's Neck, Mattituck Conklin Road, MAttituck Central Drive, MAttituck Captain K~dd Drive, Mattttuck Channel Lane, Mattituck Center Street, MAttituck Carroll Avenue, Peconic Cutchogue pond, Peconlc Calves Neck, Sou~hold Cedar Beach, Southold - ~Commoner~s ee&l highway Cottage Place, Southold Cedar Avenue, Southold Clark Road, Southold C~lestnut Road, Southold clearview Avenue, Southold Cri~ten's Lane, Southold {Southwood) Christopher street, Southold Creek Street, New Suffolk Calves Neck, $outhold Cedar Beach Road, Southold Cindy Lane, Mattituck Calves Neck Road, Southold Clearview Avenue, Southold (Fa~rview Clearview Avenue; West Park) Custer Avenue, Southold Cardinal Drive, Mattituck Estates Custer Avenue, Southold Clearview Avenue, Southold Colonial Road, Bay View, Southold Columbia Road, Bay View, Southold Creek Street(abandonment) Chan~el Lane Crown Land Lane(/~) 1.396 No227 F. 27-39- I. 186-196-138-167- K. 236 E.60= F.11-10~ D.165~ F. 58 F.41-25 N.262 N.361 P.129 K. 140 K.151 P.220 P.220 N.306 P.166 P. 64 I. 4- 8 l. 277-308-346 F.L24 P.140 F.143 I. 196-206-186~ F. 27-149- K. 212-225 N. 20-98-{,111 P. 33 P. 33 P,, 75, O- ].1 (abandonment) 9.106 P. 200~ 1.431 P.70 P.17~C.201~ D. 331~231~236 F. 246 F.7I C.235 1.232 N.311 ~ N. 71 P.110 P.185 P.170 P.228 F.S8 -abandonment Q.9 F.2;C. 201-241 K.310 P o 268 P. 298-410- P. 313 P. 313 P. 313 9. 395 P, 429-~' 9. 429 9. 440 P. 440 0-9 O- ll (abandonment) Q 36-8 SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS Depot Lane, Cutchogue F. 64 Duck Pond Road, Cutcbogue 1.475 D~cks Point Road, Cutchogue N. 37 Discontinuance of Road, Greenport-Case-N.477a4~ Highway , Gresnport N.188 Discontinuance of Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck N.347 Duck Pond Road, 0regen ~xJ~ 1.475-82 Dyer's Dock, orient F.100 ~ Deed of N. Alfred Luce N.352 /~.Dlscontinuamce of Highways -Orient N.416-42( ~ Discontinuance of King Lane-Orient .N.117 Douglas street, Orient P.136 Dlckerson's Creek, Southold C.231 Dayton Road, Southold P.245 D~e~foot Path, Cutchogue P.260 Deer Park, Mattituck P.268 Deer Drive, Mattituck P.258 Drainage Area, Eastern Shores, Inc. P. 351 ~ Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, alterationP. 385 (2) Drainage Areas-Map of Peconic Homes P. 449 Draihsge r-o-w at Acksrly Pond Lane (Latham) P. ~ Drainage area - Harvest Homes Estates, Sec. I Donna Drive - . P 472 mralnage, area Orient-By-The-Sea Sec. II P 476 Dogwood Lane, Mattituck P 477 Daisy Road, Mattituck .P 477 Delmar Drive, ~a~t~uck P 489 Delmar Drive, West, Laurel P 489 SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS · Emory Road, CutchOgue ~ East Marion to Orient East Gillette Drive, East MArion EliJah's Lane, MAttituck East Road, M~ttituck East Side Avenue, Mattituck East End, Calves Neck,Hog Neck, Shd. Egypt, Fismers Rd. to Bay Southold astern Shores, Inc. Drainage Area ' East Legion Avenue, Matti2uck Eastern Shores-Westwood Lane (part~o~ Sound Drive~43t~'P. 419 Esstwood Drive, Cutchogue Eds Road, Bay View, Southold East Road, Fleets Neck, Cutchogue Emma Drive, ~aurel Liber & Pa~e P.256 F.102 P.166 K.227; Z.483-176-172; N.120; 1,4- I. 1-8 F.175-184- ~ P. 34 P.150 F. 2; C.201-241 K.18-20; P. 295 P. 351 P. 401 P. 436 P. 440 K.-335-40 P 489 C SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS Four Roads , Arshamomaque Fleetwood Read, Cutchogue Flee~s Neck Road, Cutchogue Fawn LAne, Cutchogue Llber & Page C.133; F.2;C.34 N. 13 N. 29 P. 260 Illjl~il~.__ i1 ....... Fifth Street, Greenport First Street, Greenport Flint Street, Greenport Fourth Street, Greenport Front Street, Greenport Fleetfie~d, Greenport Fiddler Lane, Greenport P.203 Freeman Street, MAttituok N.20 Fifth Street-NeW Suffolk F.58 First Street, New Suffolk F.58 Fourth Street, New Suffolk F.58 Fifth Street, New suffolk K.91 Fourth Avenue, New Suffolk, alteration Fanning-Grathwohl Road,. New Suffolk N. Fletcher, Vincent & Willow St.,Orient Founders Path, Southold N. Fismer Road, Southold K. Fishers Road, New Suffolk P. Fred ~t_~eet~ NeW Suffolk ,~Fann/~g R6a~,~-~ SUffolk F. 373 FutureRoad Q. ........ 1.549-60 !1 --- ~ --'~_~ I. 513-20 F.139 F.136 P.140; N.75 F.139 F.141 N~387-399-400 alteration-K.291 alter~:ti~n-l(.2~7 C Glenwoo~ Road, Cutchogue Griffing Street, C~tchogue Gillette Drive, ~ast Marion Greeo Hill, Greenport Greenport0 (across Mill Creek) Gull Pond Channel, Greenport Great Peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel G. I. Lane, Laurel Grant Blvd., Mattituck Grathwohl~Fannlng Road, NeW Suffolk Goldsmith, J~s. H. road around the block and alteration F. 1081103 Goldin Lane, Southold N.176 Grove Road, Southold P. 7 Griswold Street, Southold P. 13 Glovers Street, Southold P. 13 Gagen's Landing Road, Southold P.185 Gagen's Landing Road Ex%ension, Shd. P.239 George's Road, NeW Suffolk N. 25 George's Road, addition to P. 306 Grilling Street, Cutchogue P. 309 Gardiner' s Lane, Southold (FairvieW park) P. 313 Gull pond ~W~, Graenport P. 329 Gilbert Street, Southold p. 342 Grange Road, Southold P. 356 Wiggins Lane, Greenport P. 427 LIBBR & N.237 P.231 P. 166 F. 14t D.251 F.185 1.523 K.76 ~ I. 282~ 90~ 1.520-573~ K.1-18~ ~1-3 133-142 N.451 N.107t N.143~ 147~ 25 Glen Court, Cutchogue (Vis.ta Bluff) P. 433 Gin Lane, Southold P. 446 Grigonis Path , Southold P 470 Gin__a Street, Laure~ P 489 ..... _ ....... ~--_!widenin~ of) Q-17,18 Gold Spur Street, Cutchogue Grange Road (Extension) ~§~ O 39-41 C SOUTHOLD TOWN ~OADS Liber & Page Holden Avenue, Cutcho~ue N. 37 Honeysuckle Lane, Cutchogue N. 37 Harbor Lane, Cutchogue N.93 Hamilton Avenue, Cutchogue N.242 Ha~water Road, Nassau Point, Cutehogue N. 56 Ha~water Drive, Cutchogue P~ 90 Hickory Drive, Cutchogue P. 90 .................... [1~ N.372 Hamilton Avenue Extension, Mattituck ~_20_- 98 Horton Avenue, MAtt~tuck / Harbor view Avenue, MAttituck P.150 W Harbor Road, Orient P.136 Horton, Wm. B. widening road to Nassau F. 67 Hallock's Neck, Southold F.9; D.222~F.246~ F.343=F.8; D.10.~ F.191 D.238;F.15~ D.235~ Hobart Avenue, Sou~old Z.42,63,97; A. 10(or 90?); F.1 Hog Neck, Southold F.285, 242, 33; C.241;F. 7! C.330; F.9; D.115; F.22; D.240~ F. 19~ D 238.; F.2; C.201, 241 F.304;F.19; D. 238; F.292 1.564 F. 26~F.253, 15, 215; D.236; F.8! D.113; K.$0= 1.1681 F 2~} 214 N.325 N.379 P.110 Highway, Southold I. 74 /~, ~ ~ ~ z. 4-s .... ~E ....... _-__~ -.~t'.~_-_~-..7'~ ...... 2 I. 4-8 Hill St., Mattituck N. 86 Homestead Way, Greenport P. 403 Harper Road, Southold P. 414, Q.10 (abandonment) Hog Neck Road, Southold Hommel Avenue, Soutbold Norton's Lane, Southold Hiawatha's pAth, Southold Horton~s Lane, Southold Hickory Road, Southold Hill Road, Southold P. 425~ _Holden Ave., Cutchogue P. 436~ Henry's Lane, Peconic,. , P.449 Harper Road West ~'0~O %~ P 470 Harvest Homes ~states, Sec. I - Drainage Area P 470 ~ Harbor Lights Drive P 486 'Harper Road (abandonment) SOL~[ ~ Q-~O Hfghwood Road, Southold Q 14,15,16 Horseshoe Drive, Cutchogue Q 26 Heather Place, Laurel Q30-32 SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS LIBER & PAGE Inlet Lane, Greenport Inlet Road, Mattituck Isaac Nownll Read, MA~tltuck Indian Neck Lane, Peconic Indian Neck, Peconic Inlet Mill Read, Peconic Indian Field Read, Southold Indian field . Island View Lane, Arshamomoque ~nlet Pond Read, Greenport P.120 P. 35 I. 84 F.4, 6~ c.313, 314. K.109-120; 1.134 F.6; C.314: F.23, 1.538-48: F. 69; N. 9 F.16= D.236 F.4; C.313 P. 308 P. 403 SOUTHO~D ~DWN ROADS Jackson Street, New Suffolk Jacob's Lane, Southold Jockey Creek, Southold Jockey Creek & Pine Neck, Shd. Jockey Creek Bridge, Southold Jennings Road, Southeld Jockey Creek Drive, Southold Jockey Creek Drive, Southold Jernick Lane, Southold Joseph Street, Laurel LIBOR & PAG8 1.528 K. 84 - 98 ~.103 p. 323 P. 342 extended-361 P. 378 Discontinuance of circle P 470 P 489 C (_ SOUTHOLD ~WN ROADS ~ King's Highway (Old) ~ Kraus Road, MAttituck Knollwood Lane, Mattituck Kings Highway to Bay, Mattituck Kouros Road, New Suffolk ~. King's Highway, Orient Kings Road, Orient King & Orchard Streets, Orient ~ King Street. Orient Kings Street. Orient ~King Lane, (discontinued} Orient ~ Kings Highway to Sound, Orient · Kenney's Road, Southold King's Road, Southold Korn Avenue, Southold King Street, New Suffolk j Kerwin Boulevard, Arshamomoque King Street, Orient (by User) LIBOR & PAGE F. 86, 14:D.235 P. 75 P.133 K.193 P.147 K.67; 1.129,143,151,164, 576,597 F.19; D.238 K.279 F.130, 131, i32, ~.19, 126; F.350 N.117 K.239 P.356-61; 367 F.19, 86~ D.238 1.526; 570 P.58 ~. 30e"~ P. 422 ,¢ SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS LIBER & PAGE Little Peconic Bay Road, Cutchogue N. 56 Linden Avenue, Cutchogue K.434 Llfe Saving Stat*on, East MArion K.123 Linnet Street, Greenport N 75 Laurel South Road, Laurel 1.324 Love Lane, Mattituek K.300 . Love Lane & ~milton Ave. Mattltuck I. 36,46,56,65,121 Linda Road, Mattituck P. 35 Lupton Avenue, Mattituck K.486 Legion Road, MAttituck K.506 Llpco Road, Mattituck P.201 Long Creek to North Road, Oregon I. 82 Little Nog Neck & Little Neck -Pec. F.5, 20 - C.313 - D.239 Little Neck, Peconic Long Island Railroad to North Rd., Peconic Laurel Avenue, Southold Lighthouse Road, Southold Landon Lane, Southold Locust Lane, Southold L'Hommedieu Lane, Southold Leeton Drive, Southold Lake Drive, Southold Lake Court, Southold Lupen Drive, East Cutchogue Landing Path, Southold Liberty Lane, Bay View, Southold Long Creek Drive, Southbld Longview Lane, Southold K.341 1.538-48 1.37,61,86,123 K.398,433; F.373,381. N. 62 N, 62 N. 61 P. 86 P.115 ~ P.115 . P. 285 P. 429 P. 440 P 455 P6463 Latham - r-o-w at Ackerly Pond Lane P-467 Leeward Drive, Southold P 484 Laurelwood Drive, Laurel Q 30-32 SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS McCann Lane, Greenport p. 351-366- · C C LIBER & PAGE ,Mill Creek (bridge)Arshamomaque Mud La~e, Arshamo~aque Main South Road, Cutchogue Middle Rd.,Cutchogue (Cox~s Lane to Mill LaneX F.261,310,275 Moore's L ne, Cutchogue K.434 Midwood R~ad, cutchogua N.356, 355 Mason DriVe, Cutchogue p. 90' - Meadow Lane, Cutchogue p.129 Main Street, New Suffolk K.284-295 Moose Trail, Cutchogue P.260 Manor Road, East MArion E.166 Midland Place! East Marion P.166 1.411 F.185 ~ F.28,31 F. 86  1.362~ N.I?0 ~~ No222 MOOre's Road, Greenport K.155~ 1.441 Mlddleton Road, Greenport N.387 Maple Street~ Green~o~t N.168-191 Madison Avenue, oreenport N.168-191 Main Street, GreenpOrt N.181 Manhanset9 ~enue, Greenport 1.455~ P.192 Meado~ Lane, Green~ort P.203 Madison street, Greenport P.194 Manhanset~ Avenue, Greenpo~t ~.192 Main Rd. to R.R. at Mattituck F.128 Main Road to L.IoR.R. F.113 Mar~tooka Lane, Mattitugk K.274 Matt~tu~k Creek , Mattituck F.17; D.237~ 1.109, 123 Mattituck Mill, ~oad to (Matt.) F. 13~ D.250~ 1.109-116 Middle Road, Mattituck 1.435; 40 Middle Lane from Cox's Lane to Mill Lane, Mattituck F.261, 310,275,323 Mill Lane, MAttituck Mettituck, New highway N. 85 Mary's Road, MAttituck N.102 Miriam Road, MAttituck P. 34 Marlene Lane, Mat*ituck P.140 Mayflower Road, Mattituck P.161 Mattituck Road, Mattituck I. 36,50,85,56,246,99,155,447,354 Ma~ Street, Mattituck I. 63 Mattituck to NeW Suffolk 1.195 Mill Lane to North Road, MAttituck 1.210 Mattituck Road, MAttituck I. 65 Mattituck & NeW Suffolk Road K.143 Main Street, New Suffolk K.284 -F. 58 Main Street, Orient F.3540 Methodist Church, road going east F.126 Maltby~s Lane, Southold F. 66 Maltby*s Road, Southold ~.276 · Mechanic Street, Southold F.103~ 108~ C.110 Mount Beulah Avenue, Southold 1.531~ K.393 Minnehaha Blvd., Southold N.325 Mechanic Street South, Southold N.367 Mill Creek Drive, So~thold P~ 7 Meadow Lane, Southold P. 7 Maple Road, SOUthold ~.110 Midland PArkway, Southold P.214 Mark Road, Mattituck P.258 P. 291 ~P. 294 01dMa~nRoad, Mattituck, Discontinuance of P. 37~ Property at Mill Lane Peconic Meadow Lane, Mattituck Estates P. 395 Moore's Lane~reenport (North) P. 403 Mary's Road, Mattituck P. 409 Midfarm Road, Southold P. 425 Mailler Court, Southold P. 429 Midway, Southold P. 446 Main Road, Mattituck (discontinue a portion of) P.494 C_ SOUTHOLD ~TOWN ROADS SOUTHO~D 'TOWN ROADS #N# LIBER & PA~E NeW Suffolk Road, Cutchogue F.223-30 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue N. 1, 254 North Street, Cutchogue P. 57 North Cross Road ~1~ P.178 North Road to Sound, Green~ort 1.291 North to South Nd. Greenport (Moore° s Lane) NeW Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck North Road, Mattituck Nauglee Drive, MAttituck 1.166 1.70; 1.352 F.155, 39, 66, 179,207, N.407 K.94, ~9~ K.79-82; 1.229, 1~ 217, 237 North Road, Mattituck 1.186, 190, 76, 210 North Road & Railroad Avenue, Matt. K.501 NeW Suffolk Avenue, NeW Suffolk NeW Suffolk Landing, NeW Suffolk NeW Suffolk to MAttttuck New Suffolk-~ut~oguE Road NeW Suffolk, neW road North1 Road, Oregon Narrow River, Or~ent North Road, Peconic I. 70~K.143, 150 1.279 1.195, 229,352 N. 79 N. 25 1.210, 74, 286,273,445 K.135 F, 13~ F.396, F. 16, P.22~ D.241 K.310 P.245 N.325 P.319 P.319 P.347 P.402 P.442 P.4~ 466 P 475 NoRth Road, Southold North Side Beach, Southold North Road-B~y View, Southold North Parish D~lve, Southold Nokom/s Road, outhold ~ No~th Parish Drive Extension, Shd. Northfiald Lane, Southold North Sea. Drive, Orient, N.Y. North Riley Avenue, Mattituck, N.Y. Nassau Point Road, a portion of Nassau Point Road, discontlne aa portion of Nassau Point Road, quit claim deed to Anna W. Murray, portion of Nassau Point Road (change of location of a portion of)-Q 4-8 D.251~ F.16~ D.2367 F.86~ 404 23,115-22~ D.236~ B. 21 C C SOUT~OLD TO~N ROADS "0" ~ LIB~ & PAGE Old Mulford Farm, Arshamomaque F. 30 Orchard House, Arshamomaque F. 60 Old Menhaddeh Road, CutchoguI N.262 Old Pasture Road, Cutchogue N. 37~ P.244 Oak Street, C~tchogue N. 93 Oak Drive, Cutchogue P. 90 Old COVe Road, Cutchogue N. 1 Old King's Highway to Peconic Bay East Marion Oak Oreenport Oak Place, Mattituck Oregon Road along sound shore Oak street, Msttituck oleJule Lane, Mattituck N.160 K. 204,211 1.587-96 N.287-295; I. 4-8 N.168 N.113 N.193 P. 9 P. 75 Old Mattituck Grist Mill, Mattituck Old Mill to Cox's Lane, Mattituck Old H~rbor Road, New Suffolk Oak Road, NeW Suffolk Oregon North Road ~ Orient ~ Orient Beach ~,.~ Orient to Greenport Orient Harbor Road ~/~Orient Point Road Oyster Ponds~ Orient Oyster Fonds Beach, Orient ~. Oyster Ponds Harbor, Orient ~ Orient to Greenport ~orient Highway (Map) j~rient County Court v/orchard Street, Rd. to begin Orient Oak Lawn Avenue, Southold Old Field, Southol~ Old Shipyard Road, Southold Oak Woo~ Road, Southold Oregon Road along Sound Sh~re Orchard Street, Orient 1.206 K.510 N.376-434 N.163 F.56, 61, 39~ I. 169-206; P.164~ 1.182-213 N.193 F.348,125,308,37-57,61-66,271,281 K.73 F.239,250, F.362-66 ~ 1.535 F.533 F.76 K.180 F. 40;F.48,52; F.8; D.113; F.201 D.239 F.131 D.250 F. 45 1.153 1.150 Z.576 Oaklawn Avenue Extension, Southold Oakwood Drive, Southold Orchard Street, New Suffolk 1.597 K.162,97, 107,85-901 F.233 F.3; C.201 N.61 P. 17 P.185 P.228 F. 58 Old Main Road, Mattituok, Discontinuance of Orient-By-The-Sea, Sec. II (drainage area) Old Saddle Lane, Cutchogue Q. 26 Oriot P. ~79 - P 496 P 476 Pipes Neck Road, Ar shamomaque Pequash Avenue, Cutchogue (West Pequash Neck, Cutchogue (East Rd) Pine Tree Road, Cutchogue Pierce Drive, Cutchoo~e Pacific Street, Mattituck Pike Street, Mattituck Post Road (old) Mattituck PSne Street, MAttituck Peconic Lane, Peconic Peconic to MAttituck P~rkers Landing, Peconic /~Peconic River, highway =Pine Neck, Southold Pine Neck Road, Southold ~,~ Pine Neck to Goose Creek ~00~ Pine Neck, $outhold LIBER & PAGE Petty Road, Southold Pine Road, Southold Pine Neck to Bay View, Southold Park Way, Southold Pat Lane, M~ttituck Plum Island Lane, Orient Park View Lane, Orient Peconic Homes (Drainage Area) 'Pleasan~ Place, Southold Peck Place Pike Street, Mattituck 1.274, 280,293 1.298,309; K.152, 33%= N. 29 K.335,152 N.279 N.93 P. 64 F.198: 1.24~ F.179, 197 I. 88-93 P. 9 F. 12; D.247: K.46S F.275-280 N.472 P.86 F. 1.356-61, 337-45, F. 14 F. 117 E. 60;I.528; F.12; E.246; K.260; F. 19, 4; C.313: ~?~'~ ~'~ P. 83 P.110 K.260 P.170 P.268 P.347 "~,]1) P. 347 P.449 P 463 P 470 P 495 SOU~HOLD' TOW~ ROADS LIBER & PAGE (~ 0ueen Street, Greenport (by User) P 424 C C #R" LIBER & pAGE Roads, Arshamo~ac~e F. 10, 18= D.124,237 Road to Arshamoaaqu,e, Pond N.228 Road to Bay, East Marion 1.140 Rocky Point, East M~rion F.42 'Railroad Depot, Road to (Mattituck) F.369, 158 Riley Avenue, MAttituck N-496t Ruth Road, MAttituck P. 33 - 339- Rho~a Road, Mattituck P. 35 Road froa South to North over Lon%Creek, Mattituck I. 92 Release to John Gildersleeve, Matt. 1.285 Road ending at Paconic Bay, Peconic 1.159 'Railroad Avenue, Southold F.29, 66, 99, Reydon Drive, S0uthold N.316 Richmond Road, Southold P. 53 Road Between Greenport & Southold I. 61 Road used as Highway, Southold I. 74 Remsen Avenue, Southold 1,531 Robinson Lane, Indian Nk, Peconic ~.302 Ryder Farm Lane, Orient p.347 {F4~+ %aad~}) Robinson Road, Greenport P36~ Rambler Road, $outhold P 463 Richard Stree~ Mattituck P 472 Ruth Read, Mattituqk p 477 C C SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS C South Road, Arshamomaque ~mnmer Haven Road, Arshamomaque Sterling Road, Cutchogue Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue South Cross Road, Cutchogue Sunset pAth, Cutchogue Schoolhouse Road, Cutchogue Short Road, Cutchogue Swamp Road, Cutchogue - School HOUSe Road Extension, Cutchogue ~outhern Boulevard, East Marion stephenson Beach, Inc., S. Marion Second & Third Streets, Oreenport Sixth Street, Greenport Sound Road, Greenport Southold to Greenport South to North Road, Greenport Sterling Cemetery, Greenport ~Sterlimg Schoolhouse Sutton Place and Main Street, Greenport Seventh Street, Greenport Sound D~ive, Greenport Sutton Place, Greenport Sutton Place & Main Street, Gpt. Discontinued Silvermere Rd., Greenport Sunset Lane, Greenport Sutton Place, Greenport Shirley Neck Road, Mattituck South Rd. to NeW Suffo Ave. South Road to Bay, MAttituck South Road to Railroad, Matt. South Drive, MAttit~ck Shirley Road, MAttituck Stum~it Drive, MattitRck Sound Beach Drive, M~ttituck Sunset Avenue, Mattituck Sound Avenue, Me~tituck Second Street, New Suffolk South Street, NeW Suffolk F/ Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk -Soldier's Monument,~t of Or&ant Sound Road, Orient State Street, Orient Stephenson, Mary (Old Kings Highway · Orient) ~ Stephknson Baa=h, Inc. ~v~l~A(% { . ( South Road to Ereek Peconic ~South Road, Riverhead to Orient Spring Lane, Deeonic Saug~st Neck, Southold Sound VieW Avenue, Southold South HArbor, So~thold South H~rbor Lane, southold South H rbor Road, Southold South Road, Southold Suuny$1de Road, Southold Smith D~lve North, Southold Smith Drive South, Southold Southold To Greenport Seawood Drive, Southold South Street, Southold Southern Boulevard, E. Marion LIBER & PAGE ~. 315 N.227 N.279 N.335 N.355 N. 37 P. 57 Extension P 265 & 309 P.129 P.265 N.306 P. 252 F.114 F.139 1.153, 442 1.133, 143 1.441 1.443, 455 P P N. 47 K.239 F. 202, 391 1.452 P.252 !:;t~t a 'F.5; C.313 F.86 F.213 F.14; D.235 · K.379, 398; 1.30,58. - F. 4; C.313 F.4; C.313; 1.33, 26 1.351, 26-35 F.174 N.485 P. 1 K. 19 P.214 P.239 ' '-~ N.306,,, Sound View Drive. orient (Woodhollow prop. Sutton Place, Greenport Sound Drive, Greenport Sa[taire Way, Mattituck, S~ars Road, East Marion Swamp Road, Cutchogue, Abandonment of Summit Road. Bay View, Southo[d Soundview Avenue, Peconic (Peconic Homes) School House Lane, Mattituck Ship's Drive, Southo[d Stanley Road, Mattituck ~Sunny Lane Skunk Lane (was kGowa aa Bay Avenue) ~utchogue ~Sur~er Lane ~'sunu~it Road Page 309 334 p 347 p. 3§1-366- p. 366 - 4[9- P. 389 P. 417 p. 439 p. 440 p. 449 p 452 p 468 p 477 p 477 p 477 (Town Board Motion 9- 2-72) 23-25 Q 23-25 36-8 (_ (._ LIBOR & PAGE Track Avenue, Cutchogue TO Tuthi11's Wharf, GreBnport T~ird Street, Greenport TO~n Line Road. Laurel The Anchorage, Mattituck Tabor ROad, Orient Terry, Daniel (Mechanic St. Shd.) TOWn HArbor, Southold TOWn Harbor Lane, §outhola - TOWn HArbor Road, ~outhold Tuckers Lane, Southold Terry Place, Southold Terry Court, Southold  Tuthlll Road, New suffolk Three Waters Lane, Orient Tasker Lane, Greenpurt Tuthill Road, South~ld ~ P 455 Theresa Drive ~t~ P 472 Topsail Lane P 484 P.236 F. 74 1.236, 257,264, 260, 268, 282 F.404 p.161 K. 26 F.103; C.110 F.335 K. 22; ~. 78: F. 65 ~.234 F. 21, 15, 333, 181, 106, 32, F.115-117, 8; D.240,235, 113. P. 1 p. 13 p. 61 P.347 p.366 Q-17,18 C SOUTHO.LD TqWN ROADS #V - jVanston Road. Cutchogue Vincent Street, Orient' Village Lane, Mattltuck LIBER & PAGE N. 1 K.334 P. 392 Vista Place, Cutchogue (Vista Bluff) P. 433 Victoria Drive, Bay View, Southold P. 440 C SOUT~OLD T~WN ROADS "W" LIBER & PAGE 'Wunnewe~ta Road, Cutchogue N. 57 WEst Road, Cutchogue N. 33 West Golf Club Grounds to New Suffolk Rd.,Cutchogue K.434 Wilson Road, Cutcho~ue P. 256 Wilson Landing, Cutchogue P.256 West Street, Greenport N.168 Wilmarth Avenue, Greenport N.137; P.194 Wood Lane, Greenport P.120 Wells Road, Laurel N.451 Wells, Robert road Mattituck K. 31 West MAttituck Road, Mattituck 1.320 Wlckham Avenue crossing, Mattituck 1.433 Wes~-~ew Drive, Mattituck P.161 Woodcliff Drive, Mattituck P.161 West MAttituck Road, MAttituck 1.322 Westphalia Avenue, MAttituck K.459  Westview Drive, MAttituck P.161 Wicks Road, New Suffolk N.464 Willow Street, Orient K.334 Wells Road, Peconic N.490 Wells Avenue, Southold N.426 West Creek Road, Southold P. 1 Williams Road, Southold P. 1 Wealand Road, Southold P. 17 West Mill Creek Drive, Southold P. 54 West Drive, Southold P.115 .,~L~ ~ ~ Waterview Drive, ~outhold P. 227 Wabasso Road, §outhold . P.211 Wood End Way, ~uthold ' P.170 Willow Pond Lane, Southold (Pairview Park) P. 313 Wavecrest Lane, Mattituck P. 389 ..... ~ ......................... ~ P. 398 We~woo~ Lane~-Greenport P. 403-419- Wiggins Lane, Greenport P. 427 Watersedge Way, Southold 34..1~P- 446-463 Windjammer Drive, portion of ~00~3~p 486 Willow Point Road, Southold Q 1 ~ Woodside Lane Q 30-32 ~ West Rill Road Q33 7, SOUTHOLD TOWN ROADS ~.~ber ~ page Youngs Avenue, Mattituck Ye~necott Drive, Southold 9 455 Green Innovation Grants Page 1 of 2 Employment ] Calendar t News [ Forms & Documen Prow'di~g Low Cost Financing and Technical Assistance to Munictpa#tie~; Businesses and State Ag~cies for Env~nmentM p~OJects SRF Economic Recover~ Program ~ About tile Economic Recovery Water Quality Management ~ Planning Project Grants Governor Paterson Announces $4 Million In Economic ~ Recovery Funding For Long Island Wastewater Project Announced SRF Stimulus ~ Funded Projects (as of April 3, 20O9) ~ ARRA Guidance Documents CWSRF intended Use Plan ~ Listing Form DWSRF Intended Use Plan I. Listing Form ~ EFC Streamlined Application ~ Green Innovation Grants Green Innovation Grants ~ Program (GJGP) Energy Efficiency ~ Partnership with NYSERDA Green Infrastructure Within ~' the 2009 CWSRF IUP ~ EFC Documents/Letters ~ What's New ~ Stimulus FAQs Economic Recovery Press ~ Clips Governor Paterson's ~ Announcements/Testimony Federal ~ Announcements/Documents ~ Usoful Links Green Innovation Grants The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) authorized that not less than of economic stimulus funding provided for the State Revolving Funds (SRFs) be use¢ ' green infrastructure. Of the $432 million in stimulus funds appropriated for the Ne~ Clean Water SRF, $86.5 million will be available for green infrastructure projects. O $86.8 million in stimulus funds appropriated for the New York Drinking Water SRF, ~ million will be available for green infrastructure projects. For the purpose of ARRA funding via the SRF, green infrastructure includes: · Water efficiency, reuse or conservation- projects that are either part of or serve a or wastewater utility project; · Energy efficiency~ projects that reduce energy consumption, use renewable energ~ produce dean energy for water or wastewater facilities. · Green wet weather infrastructure~ projects that maintain, restore, or mimic natur~ systems to infiltrate, evapotranspirate, or recycle stormwater (~:lick~b~Ee for more information on CWSRF and DWSRF project details); · Environmental innovation- projects that manage water resources to prevent or rer pollution in an economically sustainable way. The New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC) is implementing spe( SRF initiatives through which ARRA funding for green infrastructure projects will be available. For more information on these initiatives, project eligibility and applicatior processes, click on the links below. _G.E_e_en G[a..Qt_s~ Ap.p_j~at oD Dg_cu~.m_eots _G~GP PowerPo nt Presenta_tjQ~n EFC Ener(lv Eft c encv Part;nershiD with NYSERDA Green ~nfrastructure w th n the 2009 C ean Water State Revo v ng Fund Intended U~ Green Infrastructure FAO's Chck here to subscr'be to EFC's Economic Recovery Update Email Service to receive latest information about funding for green infrastructure. http://www.nysefc.org/home/index.asp?page=687 5/22/2009 Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) Page 1 of 1 Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) Program Description: Federal Agency: Agency Website: National Total: Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) provides Iow-interest financir and protect the water quality of New York State. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http: //www.epa.gov/owm/cwfinance/cwsrf/ $4.0 Billion New York State Total: Entities Eligible to Apply: Flow of Funds: Obligation Deadline: Reporting Requirments: $432.5 million Towns, villages, cities, counties, public authorities, public benefit corporat agencies of the State of New York can apply for point source projects sucf wastewater treatment plants and sewers. Non-municipal entities may apl; CWSRF-eligible nonpoint source projects such as brownfield remediation; leachate collection, storage and treatment; landfill gas collection; landfill ( stormwater management; waterbody restoration; and failing decentralize¢ systems. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency distributes the funds by formul who use the funds to finance qualified water quality projects. Potential apl submit a Project Listing Form to have their project considered by EFC. Pro submitted an engineering report and need funds within the next Federal F be included on the Annual List of the Intended Use Plan (IUP). Availability the number of Annual List projects that are can receive financing. For func an application for financing needs to be submitted to EFC. When all inforrr to the application is in order and if funds are available, EFC approves the I financing. Following a subsequent approval by the Public Authorities Contr (PACB), EFC and the community will enter into a financing agreement. Th~ may then submit a disbursement request to EFC in order to receive funds. One year from enactment (February 17, 2010) Details of the reporting requirements are being developed. Information re recipients will include construction contract award and execution, construe completion, and quarterly construction updates. State Agency: State Agency Website: New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation www.recove~'.ny.gov w~w~,.nysefc.org/recovery State Agency Technical Contact: James E. Flaherty, P.E. Additional Information: Use this form to request additional information. http://www.recovery.ny.gov/Handbook/InfrastructureWater&Sewer 1 .htm 5/22/2009 USDA Rural Development Water & Environment Program Page 1 of 1 USDA Rural Development Water & Environment Program Program Description: USDA Rural Development Water & Environment Program (WEP). Provides and loan guarantees for water and sewer projects in rural areas of less th~ population, Federal Agency: Agency Website: National Total: New York State Total: Entities Eligible to Apply: USDA Rural Development http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/ny/ $1.38 billion in budget authority; program level nationally is approximatel loan and approximately $968 million in grants. Individual state allocations are currently embargoed. However, based on [ amounts it can be estimated that New York will be allocated 3.38% of the approximately $95 million in loans and approximately $37 million in grant Loans and grants are open to public entities, such as municipalities, count purpose districts, nonprofit corporations including cooperatives, and tribal A new entity may be created to apply for this program. Flow of Funds: Obligation Deadline: Reporting Requirments: ARRA projects must be submitted to the state office and approved by the to receive funding. Approved funding will be forwarded to the State Office Rural Development local offices, where approved funds will be dispersed i~ with existing procedures. Key criteria for ARRA funding is project's "shove status, its job creation, and the entity's inability to obtain needed funds fr sources at reasonable rates and terms. Projects must be consistent with e development plans. Loan guarantees on amounts sourced through banks, loans, mortgage and insurance companies may be available for up to 90 I: eligible loss incurred by the lender. Grants may be provided when necess[ user costs to a reasonable level. Applications are handled directly by 10 U offices in NY. · Fifty (50) percent of the funds must be obligated in 120 days (approximat The remainder of the funds must be obligated by 9/30/10. Unfunded back from previous years may be eligible. Prime non-federal recipients will be responsible for reporting their use of I as any sub-awards, such as sub-grants or sub-contracts, that they make of financial assistance must provide quarterly and final performance activi USDA Rural Development until the project is complete and the funds are E State Agency: N/A State Agency Website: State ·Agency Technical Contact: Additional Information: www.recovery.ny.gov N/A Contact the federal agency listed above for additional information. http://www.recovery.ny.gov/Handbook/lnfrastructureWaterDevelopment4.htm 5/22/2009 Green Innovation Grants Program (GIGP) Page 1 of 2 Employment I CalendaJ J News I Forms & Documen Providing Low Cost Financing and Teci~nicat Assi~tance to Municlpa#tie~, Businesses and State ABencies for En~nmentat ~ojects SRF Economic Recovery Program ~ About the Economic Recove~ Water Quality Management I. Plan!ling Project Grants Governor Paterson Announces $4 Million In Economic ~ Recovery Funding For Long Island Wastewater Project Announced SRF Stimulus ~ Funded Projects (as of April 3, 2009) ~ ARRA Guidance Documents CWSRF Intended Use Plan ~ Listing Form DWSRF Intended Use Plan ~ Listing Form !~ EFC Streamlined Application ,, Green Innovation Grants Green Innovation ~ Grants Program (GIGP) GIGP Application GIGP PowerPoint ~ Presentation EFC GIGP Web Cast Held ~ on April 24, 2009 National Geographic I. Green Roof Photos Energy Efficiency ~ Partnership with NYSERDA Green Infrastructure Within I. the 2009 CVVSRF IUP ~ EFC Documents/Letters i What's New I, Stimulus FAQs ~ Clips Green InnovatiOn Grants Program (GIGP) For projects that qualify for the GIGP, EFC will provide grants subject to availability ARRA funds. These projects will be listed in Category G of the Clean Water SRF tnt[ Use Plan (IUP), EFC will be accepting applications for G[GP projects through a separ application process for listing in the IUP. Drinking Water projects also may apply funds. GIGP projects must meet the applicable requirements of the ARRA and SRF programs, Please note that the Application Deadline for the GIGP has been extended f May 9 to May 29, 2009. Application procedures, forms, guidance on project eligibi criteria for selection, and other program requirements will soon be available on EFC' website. EFC estimates about $35 million will be utilized through the GIGP for Clean Water SI projects funded through the GIGP. Projects that receive funding will be posted on th website (WWw._ny.~_ef_c_._or~q), as approved. An additional $3 million may be available f( Drinking Water SRF. If you already have a project listed on the IUP for either the C ean Water or Drinkin( Water SRF and would like more information, please contact your EFC or DOH projeci engineer. GIGP ADDlication Documents EPA Memo CWSRF and DWSRF Project Descr pt ons and Examp es for Green Projecl Last Updated: 5/15/2009 10:57:33 AM http://www.nysefc.org/home/index.asp?page=688 5/22/2009 Catalog of Federal Funding Sources for Watershed Protection Page 1 of 3 U.S. Enviro MI Pro Agency Watershed Academy , Recent Additions I Contact Us I Print Version Search: ' ~ · EPA Home · Water · _WeAtands, Ocean~, & Water~_b.e__d_s · Watersheds · _Wa_ters_hed__A._ca-d...e-m~ Fe~a~-Fund~n~ (or Watershed Protection Home How to Use this Site Complete List of All Programs Programs Listed by Keyword Programs Listed by Agency Administration * (requires Iogin) Other Funding Sources Catalog of Federal Funding Sources for Watershed Protection Funding Program Name: Source Reduction Assistance Grant Program ~.pplication Deadline 45 days from post date, refer to Web address isted for Primary internet ~,vailableINhen Funds are Between June and September annual I150 Average number of app cants Typical percentage of I15% applicants funded required?Is a matched amount Yes Match Amount The Agency requires the applicant to ~rovide a minimum 5% match, as ~art of the total allowable project :est. For example, the Federal government will provide 95% of the total allowable cost of the project and the recipient will provide the remaining 5%. The match may be ~ssued in the form of cash and/or in- kind contributions (e.g., donated services, charges for real property and equipment or the value of goods and services directly benefiting the EPA-funded project). Funding Level FY ~007 ~008Funding Level FY $1.1 million 2009Funding Level FY $1.1 million, Typical lowest $10,000 amount awarded Typical highest $130,000 amount awarded Typical median amount awarded Other details on N/A [undin$ , http://cfpub.epa.gov/fedfund/program.cfm?prog num=115 5/22/2009 Catalog of Federal Funding Sources for Watershed Protection Page 2 of 3 ~rimary Address U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxic Substances, Pollution Prevention Division (7409 M) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460 1Primary Telephone 11202-564-8857 Primary Email I[amhaz.michele@epa.gov IPrimary Internet IIwww.epa.~ovlp21pubsl,qrants Secondary Address Secondary Telephone Secondary Email Secondary Internet Iwww.cfda.gov (Search on prog[am 166.717) Legislative Authority Clean Air Act, Section 103(b), as amended; Clean Water Act, Section 104(b)(3), as amended; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, Section 20, as amended; Safe Drinking Water Act, Section 1442(a)(1 ) and (c), as amended; Solid Waste Disposal Act, Section 8001(a), as amended; and Toxic Substances Control Act, Section 10, as amended." ~.ssociated Air Quality/Deposition, Agriculture, Keywords Best Management Practices, Economic Development, Outreach/Education, Monitoring, Partnerships, Planning, Point Source Control, Pollution 3revention, Research, Solid /Vaste, Source Water Protection, .3tormwater Management, Water .~onservation Eligible ;ommunitygNatershed Group, Organizations ~lonprofit Groups, Educational Institution, Conservation District, Atater and Wastewater Utilities, Local Government, State/Territorial ~gency, Tribal Agency, Indian Tribes, Irrigation and Drainage Districts, Cooperative Associations ar Districts, Clubs and Organizations, Local Organizations, Including Non- ~rofits, Schools and Governments IEligibility Constraintsll Wetlands, Oceans & Watersheds I Watershed Protection g~.Ho~m~ I I~fjy_a_c_y_and S~ec_u_ri.ty_...Np_~i~ I ¢on!a_c_t .U..~ Last updated on Fdday, May 22, 2009 http://cfpub.epa.gov/fedfund/program.cfm?prog num=115 5/22/2009 Catalog of Federal Funding Sources for Watershed Protection Page 1 of 2 Watershed Academy Recent Additions [ Contact Us [ Print Version search: Ill EPA Home · Water > _W~t~t~nds, Oceans_, & W0tershed~s > Watersheds · _VVat~rahe~l Academy ~"~al ~nding for Watershed Protection Home How to Use this Site Complete List of All Programs Programs Listed by Keyword Programs Listed by Agency Administration * (requires Iogin) Other Funding Sources Catalog of Federal FUnding Sources for Watershed Protection Funding Program Name: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Application Deadline Contact your state office for more information (click on the link listed under "Primary Internet"): P/hen Funds ara Funds are available throughout the Available fisca year beginning in October. ~.verage annual INot available number of app cants Typical percentage of INot available applicants funded Is a matched amount required? Match AmountII .... Funding Level FY srants: $349 million;Loans: $990 2007 million; Guarenteed Loans: $75 Funding Level FY Grants: $349 million; Loans: $1 2008 billion; Guarenteed Loans: $75 million Funding Level FY Grants: $1.368 billion; Loans: $857 2009 million; Guarenteed Loans: $75 million; Disaster Program Loans: ~49 million; Reinvestment Recovery Act Direct Loans: $2.7 billion amountrypical IoweStawarded $6,250 loan and $4,600 grant typical highest $29 million loans and $9.9 million amount awarded grant amountTypical median awarded $865,894 loan and $642,000 grant Other details on N/A fund n~ Primary AddreSs Please contact state or local office. Primary Telephone II IPrimary Email IIPlease contact state or local office Primary Internet Ilhttp://www.ru rdev.usda.~ov/ http ://cfpub.epa.gov/fed fund/program.cfm?prog num=59 5/22/2009 Catalog of Federal Funding Sources for Watershed Protection Page 2 of 2 Secondary Address U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistant Administrator, Water and Environmental Programs,Rural Itilities Service, ~oom 4050-S, Stop 1548 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, ~/ashington, DC 20250 TelephoneSeC°ndary (202) 690-2670 ISecondary Email Secondary Internet www.cfda.gov (Program Number 10.760) Legislative Authority Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, section 306, Public Law 92-419, 7 U.S.C. 1926 ~,ssociated Drinking water, Economic Keywords Development, Ground Water, Planning, Solid Waste, Source Water Protection, Stormwater Management, Wastewater, Watershed Management Eligible CommunitygNatershed Group, Organizations Nonprofit Groups, Conservation District, Local Government, Tribal Agency Eligibility Constraints Also eligible are counties and other )olitical subdivisions of a state (such as districts), and authorities, associations, cooperatives, and ndian tribes that are federally 'ecognized. Wetlands, Oceans & Watersheds I Watershed Protection ~EpA.~H~m.e_ I Privacy and _S~urity Notice I _Cqntact Us Last updated on Fflday, May 22, 2009 URL: ht~p:/Icfpub.epa.gov/fedfund/prograrn.cfm?prog_num=59 http://cfpub.epa, gov/fedfund/program.cfm?prog num=59 5/22/2009 Catalog of Federal Funding Sources for Watershed Protection Page 1 of 2 U.S. Environmental Protec~Jon Agenc~ Watershed Academy ~.'~ Recent Additions I Contact Us_ I Print Version Search: EPA Home > Water · _W...~ttan..d...s_,_Qc~..a...n.~.~ ?_~ters...h.~d~ · _W.a_~e_[~(J~ > _Wate_r..s-t3~d ~_c..ade_~y · Fed~[~i F~ndi-r¥~or Watershed Protection Home How to Use this Site Complete List of All Programs Programs Listed by Keyword Programs Listed by Agency Administration * (requires login) Other Funding Sources Catalog of Federal Funding Sources for Watershed Protection Funding Program Name: Wetlands prOgram Development Grants ~,pplication [:)eadline When Funds are Available Deadlines are determined annually and vary from region to region. For more information click on the link listed under "Primary nternet," Grants are usually approved within 4 months of receipt of complete application. Average 1200 annual number of applicants Typical tl50°/o percentage of applicants [ funded Is a matched Yes amount required? Match 25% Amount Funding 1516.83 million Leve FY 2007 Funding $16.57 million Level FY 2008 Funding $16.6 million Leve FY 2009 awardedam°untl°westrypical $11,000 Typical $500,000 highest amount awarded Typical ~;250,000 median amount awarded Other details Regional RFPs (for States, Tribes, and local on funding Ilgovernments), and Headquarter RFPs (for interstate http://cfpub.epa, gov/fedfund/program.cfrn?, prog num=65 5/22/2009 Catalog of Federal Funding Sources for Watershed Protection Page 2 of 2 associations, intertribal consortia, and non-profit, non-governmental organizations) can be found at: http:llwww.epa.govlowOwlwetlandslgrantguidelinesl AddressPrimary Contact regional EPA office or Headquarters office Primary Please contact EPA regional wetland coordinator Telephone (see pr mary internet) Primary 1please contact EPA regional wetland coordinator Email ~(see pr mary internet) InternetPrimary www.epa.gov/owow/wettands/grantguidelines/ Secondary U.S, Environmental Protection Agency Address Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Wetlands Division (4502T) Ariel Rios Bldg., 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460 Secondary (202) 566-1225 Telephone EmailSec°ndary price.myra@epa.gov (HQ contact) Secondary Nww.cfda.gov (search on program 66.461 and/or Internet 36.462) Legislative ~,lean Water Act, Public Law 92-500, section 104(b) .uthori~ [3), 33 U.S.C. 1254(b)(3) Associated Coastal Waters, Outreach/Education, Keywords EnforcementJCompliance, Fisheries, Forests, Monitoring, Nonpoint Source Control, Planning, Restoration, Floodplains/Riparian Zones, Stormwater Management, Watershed Management, Wetlands, Wildlife Eligible Nonprofit Groups, Local Government, Organizations State/Territorial Agency, Tribal Agency Eligibility Tribes must be federally recognized. Non-profit, Constraints non-governmental organizations that undertake activities to advance wetland programs on a national basis are eligible. Wetlands. Oceans & Watersheds I W0tershed Protection EPA Home I Privacy and Security Notice I (;qntact Us Last updatsd on Fdday, May 22, 2009 URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/fedfund/prograrn.cfm?prog_n um=65 http ://cfpub .epa. gov/fedfund/program.c fm?prog hum=65 5/22/2009 Grants for Non-point Source, Stormwater Management Water Quality Projects - NYS De... Page 1 of 4 Printer-friendly II A-ZSubjectlndex II ~ Enter search words Home >> Public Involvement and News >> News >> Environment DEC >> 2003 Environment DEC Archive >> Grants for Non-point Source, Stormwater Management Water Quality Projects Outdoor Recreation DEC Animals, Plants, Aquatic',,ENVIR~NMENT Chemical & Pollution Contro¢rom the September 2003 issue Energy and Climate Lands and Waters Education Permits and Licenses Grants for Non- point Source, Stormwater Public Involvement and "Management News Enviro"mentDEC Water Quality 2003 Environment DEt r,,iects Archive vj Grants for Non-pointr31::~' ix makinn ~46 million available to Source, Stormwater .... ~" Management Water municipalities throughout the state for Quality Projects water quality projects that improve Regulations and Enforcement stormwater management and non-point Publications, Forms, Maps source abatement and control. In some About DEC parts of the state, grants also will be available for wastewater treatment improvement or aquatic habitat restoration. WQIP 2003 Application Forms, which have been mailed to each municipality in the state, must be completed and submitted. All applications must be postmarked by September 30, 2003, except for the Hudson River Estuary All Regions In This Issue: Draft of Catskil State Land Ma Plan Released New Boats to ! Marine and : Freshwater La, Enforcement 2003-2004 Sp~ Licenses Now Available Grants Annour Projects in Ne~ City and West( County Winner of 200: York State Min Land Rectama Award Announ Fourth Annual River Valley R~ Scheduled : NYS Sends Firefighters to, with Montana ' Wildfires Governor Ann( http://www.dec.ny.gov/environmentdec/25517.html 5/22/2009 Grants for Non-point Source, Stormwater Management Water Quality Projects - NYS De... Page 2 of 4 Phase I Long Term Control Plans for CSO applications, which are due no later than December 31, 2003. Copies of the 2003 application are available by calling DEC's Bond Act Office at (518) 402-9342, or by visiting DEC's website. "These critical grants offer funding from several sources, enabling municipalities and other entities to move forward with important water quality improvement projects that might not otherwise be completed," DEC Commissioner Erin M. Crotty said. "Governor Pataki's continued emphasis on protecting and enhancing our natural resources has made New York a national leader in controlling water pollution and preserving our rivers, lakes and estuaries." Phase II Focus A major focus of this year's grant program is to help municipalities meet new Phase II stormwater regulations. Regulated municipalities can apply for EPF funds to implement the required stormwater minimum control measures. DEC encourages cooperation among regulated municipalities to foster consistency in stormwater management programs throughout watersheds and counties and to make efficient use of available funds. Different Grants, Different Projects Rec o~ent of 2(~ Environmental Stewardsh p A Governor Sign Convene Task on Invasive Sp Hunters Enjoy Successful Sp~ Turkey Seasor Lake Champla Lamprey Cont~ Program Cont Delaware Rive Catch-and- Re Catches On Contact for th Page: NYSDEC DPAE 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12: 4500 518-402-8013 email us http://www.dec.ny.gov/environmentdec/25517.html 5/22/2009 Grants for Non-point Source, Stormwater Management Water Quality Projects - NYS De... Page 3 of 4 Wastewater treatment is one focus of a Bond Act grant for Long Island Environmental Protectign Fund (EPF): $10.1 million for non-point source abatement and control projects. The federal Performance Partnership Grant will provide an additional $1 million in funds for non-point source abatement and control projects. Another $3.4 million is available from the EPF to help regulated communities implement Stormwater Phase II requirements. Long Island: $10 million total from the Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act for wastewater treatment, non-point source abatement and aquatic habitat projects in the Peconic Estuary and the South Shore'Estuary Reserve management plan areas. An additional $65,000 from the EPF is available for planning and outreach activities in the Peconic Estuary. The federal Long Island Sound Restoration Act is providing $1.8 million for wastewater treatment, non-point source abatement, aquatic habitat restoration, assessment and planning activities to implement the Long Island Sound Comprehensive Conservation Management Plan. New York City Watershed: $7.4 million http://www.dec.ny.gov/environmentdec/25517.html 5/22/2009 Grants for Non-point Source, Stormwater Management Water Quality Projects - NYS De... Page 4 of 4 from a combination of state funding and the federal Safe Drinking Water Act to advance the New York City Watershed Protection Program through demonstration, assessment, planning and education projects. Capital District: $2 million from the EPF to assist in controlling the state's last major uncontrolled Combined Sewer Overflows (CSO) in area communities and sewer districts for the Phase I Long Term Control Plan for Combined Sewer Overflows. Onondaga Lake: $10 million in state funding for wastewater improvement projects to implement the Onondaga Lake consent order. Privacy Policy I Website Usage and Policies I Website Accessibility I Employment I Contact Us Copyright ~;) 2009 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation http://www.dec.ny.gov/environmentdec/25517.html 5/22/2009 SOUTHOLD TOWN STORMWATER STRUCTURE INVENTORY - CATCH BASINS Date: Recorder: Street: Hamlet; Structure ~, Outfall #: · Structure Type: Depth: Structure Cond: G/C Type: # of Grates: GIC Cond: Cleaning Cond! S~anding Water. Pipes; Comments: Structure #:. Outfall ~. Structure Type: Depth: StnJ~ture Cond: G/C Type:, # of Grates: GIC Cond: Cleaning Cond: S~andlng Water. Pipes: Comments: Structure #: Outfall ~ Structure Type: Deplh:. Sl:ructure Cond: GIC Type: # of Grates: G/C Cend: Cleaning Cond: Standing Water: Pipes: Comments: Structure #: Out'fall #: Structure Type: Structure Cond: G/C Type:, # of Grates:. Cleaning Cond: Standing Water: Pfpes: Comments: Structure #: Structure Cond: Cleaning Cond: Commente: Depth:, G/C Cond: Ouffall ~ G/C Type: S~andlrtg Water. Structure Type: # of Grates: Pipes: Depth: G/C Cond: 09:12 AM P. 005 Southold Town Stormwater Structure Inventory - Outfalls Date: General location of site: Waterbody the discharge draining to: Recorden Longitude (in NAD 1983): Latitude (in NAD 1983): GIS layer and reference number: Outfall type: 0utfall material Outfall photo filenam .e~,: Dimensions: Functionality: Outfall description/condition: , $OUTHOLD TOWN'STORMWATER STRUCTURE INVENTORY- RECHARGE BASINS Date: Recorder: Street: Hamlet: RCB #: Fence Cond: Pipes: Owner. Comments: Overflow;. Vegetation: Standing Water: Cleaning Cond: Pictures: RCS #: Fence Cond: Pipes:. Overflow;. Vegetation: S~anding Water: C[eanlng Cond: Comments: Pictures: SOUTHOLD TOWN SIDEWALK INVENTORY Date: Recorder: Street: Hazard #: Comments: Hazard Type: Condition: Hazard #: Comments: Hazard Type:. Condition: Hazard #: Comments: Hazard Type:. Condition: Hazard #: Comments: Hazard Type:. Condition: Hazard #: Comments: Hazard Type:. Condition: Item Date Data Recorder Street Hamlet Structure # Ouffall # Structum Type Depth Structure Cond GIC Type # of Grates GIC Cond Cleaning Cond Standing Water Pipes Comments Catch basin Parameters The date the catchs basin infehmation ls being recorded The name of the technician fiJfing in the daLa sheets Full street name Hamlet name Sequential number assigned to the structure Ouffall ID of theflnal discharge point of the system (if readily identifiable) Description of structure (e.g. round 8' diameter or square 4x4) Measure or estimate the depth of the catch basin. Rate condition of structure below the topslab (sea rating system below) Description of grate casting (e.g. round, square, square+curb inlet) Note the number of grates on the catch basin Rate condition of the grate/casting (see rating system below) Rate cleaning need (see rating system below) Note if there is standing water, and if you think it is attributable to a recent rainfall see below) Note the presence and direction of pipes (e.g. '12" RCP going Northwest)~ Note any comments to describe condition of the catch basin as well as guesstimates as to what it may be connected to. Structural Ra~ing System: Grate/Casting Rating System C, leanlng Rat)rig O = Partially collapsed or has the potential to collapse 1 = some cracks/minor repairs needed 2 = good condition 3 = like new Very poor condition; potential hazard some rusting or cracking, minor repairs needed good condition like new 0 = Womt, completely dogged with soil/debris System: Standing Water Rating System: Significant debris, but still appears to drain/convey properly Soil/debris starting to accumulate but appears to drain/c~nvey easily drains like new yes = thera is standing water in the catch basin no = there appeara to be no standing water yes, rainfall = there is standing water, but it is likely attributable to rainfall (has mined in the past 24 hours) IDDE Site Visit Field Procedure Make each road or parcel its own "project/file name". Within each project take all of the GPS points for all outfalls on that road/parcel. If you accidentally leave the project while using the GPS unit in the field, you can add more points with the following steps: On the data page, choose new then existing file. Select File then Open Select the road or parcel you were working with Select Begin Now you can continue to add points to this project. After taking each point record your comment into the GPS unit as follows: Outfall type-Photo numbers Example: "pipe-012, 013" Fill out a datasheet, take a GPS reading, and take 2 photos of every outfall encountered. Follow this procedure, even if you have some doubt as to whether its an outfall or not. If you are not sure, use the "Ouffall description/condition" section to explain why in as much detail as possible. Do the same if you think there may be an ouffall, but you cannot access it or fmd it. If this is the case you cannot take a GPS point, but you can fill out a datasheet explaining the circumstances and take the photographs. When writing an explanation in this section, keep in mind that someone who has never been to the site should be able to get a clear idea of the situation there just from reading the comments. Photos: One photo should be a close up of the actual structure. The second should be set back so that thc site is easily recognizable to someone revisiting it. Datasheet: General location of the site: Some frame of reference that will be easy to understand when trying to locate this site again. Examples: Roads: Empties into creek behind Elementary School at Smith and Main Streets, County Road 1. Parcels: Name of facility, name of nearest road, etc. and Tax Map Number. Waterbody the discharge is draining to: This needs to be the actual name ofa waterbody: Long Island Sound, Amityville Creek, etc. Not stream, creek, lake, etc. If you are not sure what waterbody this is, consult a map. Latitude and Longitude: Coordinates taken from the GPS unit, the GPS unit should be in State Plane (Feet) Long Island NAD 1983. GIS Layer and Reference Number: Leave blank Outfall type (one of the following): Pipe, box, culvert, seep or swale. If none of these descriptions fit, use something different, but explain thoroughly in the "outfall description/condition" section. Dimensions (inches): Diameter if it is cimutar, length across at the widest opening for another shape. For example, if it is a road drain going directly to a culvert, the length of the longest opening on the structure. If needed, explain in the "outfall description/condition" section. Ouffall material:. Granite, cast iron, corrugated metal, corrugated plastic, concrete, white PVC, green PVC, red clay, asbestos, etc. If you are not sure, make your best judgment and explain. Functionality: Yes, no or possibly. If you write "no" or "possibly," explain why. Outfall description/condition: Photo numbers should be listed here. Make as many observations as possible and be as detailed as possible. The more you write here, the better. Describe the outfall's condition and comment if the receiving water quality is poor. Make sure it is clear what you are describing. If you write "brown and dirty" I don't know if you're describing the ouffail or the water. Also make comments if the structure is corroded, broken, or if flow is seeping out around the structure, etc. If you have any question about the outfall, whether it is actually draining stormwater from County property, whether it is actually an outfail structure, etc. Take points and fill out a datasheet, just explain your reasoning here. If you cannot tell if there is dry flow because it has recently rained, comment on this. This is also where you should explain any difficulty finding the site, any explanation of your earlier data entry, photographs, etc. If you have trouble finding an outfall, think you found one but are not sure, or think there may be one but can't fred it, describe the situation here in as much detail as possible. Take a GPS point if possible. EXPLAIN EVERYTHING. Dry weather flow: Yes, no, or maybe. If"maybe," explain as above and fill in any appropriate data on the rest of the sheet. If no, you are done filling out the datasheet. If yes, continue to fill out the sheet as follows: Flow amount: Dry, moist, drip, trickle, moderate, or standing water Turbidity: None, cloudy, opaque Color: None, Gray, Brown, Yellow, Green, etc. Odor: None, Sewage, Oil/Gas, Laundry, Sulfide, etc. Floatables: None, Sewage, Oil Sheen, Soap Suds, Foam, etc. Deposits (on the actual outfall structure): None, Black, Brown, Yellow, White, etc. Vegetation Growth: Normal, Excessive, Inhibited Amount (Rainfall): Estimate to the best of your ability the time since the last rainfall and the amount of rain. Description of dry weather flow: The goal is to determine if there is an illicit discharge to this outlet. Make as many comments as needed as to whether you believe there is something other than stormwater discharging here. EXPLAIN EVERYTHING. Note: the below were added to the data sheet in order to be consistent with what the DEC wants!! General location = name of park or municipal building, address, etc Longitude and latitude = get reading from GPS (make sure it is in the right coordinate system GIS layer and reference number = will be assigned after download and incorporation into GIS database Outfall Type = pipe, box, culvert, seep, or swale Dimensions = diameter if it is cimular, improvise if it's another shape Ouffall matedal = granite, cast iron, corrug.metal, corrug. Plastic, concrete, white PVC, green PVC, red clay, asbestos functionality = no, possibly, yes (your best guess) Outfall description/condition = make as many observations as possible regarding the condition and what you might think it is attached to Item Date Recorder Street Hamlet RCB #: Overflow Standing Water Fence Cond Vegetation Cleaning Cond. Comments Photographs Recharge Basins Parameters The date the recharge basin information is being recorded The name of the technician filling in the data sheets Full street name Hamlet name Sequential number assigned to the structure Yes or no, whether an overflow structure is present. Yes or no, whether standing water is present. If yes, approximately when was the last rainfall? Rate condition of fence (see rating system below) Rate condition of vegetation (see rating system below) Rate cleaning need (see rating system below) Note any comments to describe condition of the recharge basin as well as guesstimates as to what it may be connected to (e,g,; "recharge basin stands alone" or "recharge basin likely ties to outfall xyz"). Take pictures of the inlet, basin, and any overflow structures. Fence Rating System Vegetation Rating System Cleaning Rating System: 0 = Very poor condition; needs immediate repair 1 = some rusting or gaps, some minor repairs needed 2 = good condition 3 = like new 0 = Barren, little to no vegetation 1 = Moderate amount of vegetation/coverage 2 = Overgrown, but can still see structure 3 = Overgrown, structure not visible 0 = Worst, completely clogged with soil/debris 1 = Significant debris, but still appears to drain properly 2 = Soil/debris starting to accumulate but appears to drain easily drains 3 = In good condition Item Sidewalk Parameters Date Recorder Street The date the sidewalk information is being recorded The name of the technician filling in the data sheets Full street name Hazard # Hazard Type Condition Comments Sequential number assigned to the hazard Description of hazard (i.e. uplift, break, crock, tree root) Rate condition of the hazard (see rating system below) Note any comments to describe the condition of the hazard as well as what may be attributing to the damage Hazard Rating System: 1 = very poor condition, requires immediate attention, priority repair 2 = poor condition, repairs recommended to prevent further damage 3 = fair condition, minor repairs needed PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fa~:, 6~ ~, ~5z.3.1~ 36 June 30, 2009 Campbell Charles H & Ors P.O. Box 169 East Marion, NY 11939 Dear Sir or Madam: The Town of Southold recently launched the Illicit Discharge Mappthg Pi'oject' as'arneans to'com'p, ly with Phase II of the New York State Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS41 Program and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Specifically, we must identify and map all stormwater structures (catch basins, outfalls, and recharge basins) within our municipality. In order to accurately assess the drainage system in our tow~, we must gain access to pdvate subdivisions. A letter granting the Town of Southald permission to conduct surveys 'n your neighborhood would help to produce the most accurate data set possible. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated as we dedicate our efforts to eliminating illicit discharges to our waters and within our community. Letters may be emailed to meaghan.burke~town.southold.ny.us or mailed to: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O, Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971. Please feel frae to contact the Town Planning Board with any questions at (631) 765-1938. Sincerely, Meaghan Burke PETTY'S BIGHT ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. Box 424 ORIENT, NY 11957 July 16, 2009 Ms. Meaghan Burke Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Burke: This letter is to grant permission to the Town of Southold to conduct any necessary surveys within the Petty's Bight Association regarding storm water structures. If you have any questions please let us know. Sincere. ly, l~esident PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June 30, 2009 Petty's BightAssoclnc. P.O. Box 424 Orient, NY11957 Dear Sir or Madam: The Town of Southold recently launched the Illicit Discharge Mapping Project as a means to comply with Phase II of the New York State Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Program and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Specifically, we must identify and map all stormwater structures (catch basins, ouffalls, and recharge basins) within our municipality. In order to accurately assess the drainage system in our town, we must gain access to private subdivisions. A letter granting the Town of Seuthold permission to conduct surveys in your neighborhood would help to produce the most accurate data set passible. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated as we dedicate our efforts to eliminating illicit discharges to our waters and within our community. Letters may he emailed to meaghan.burke@town.southotd.ny, us or mailed to: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971. Please feel free to contact the Town Planning Board with any questions at (631) 765-1938. Sincerely, Meaghan Burke PLANNING BOARD MEMBEI~ MAR?]~ H. SIDO~ WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. ~,,DW,,~D8 GEORGE D- 8OLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNiN(~ BOAI~ OFFICE TOWN OF 8OUTHOLD MAH.I~G ADDRESS: P,O, Box 1179 $outhcld, NY 11971 O~CE IX)CATION: Town Hall Annex 5437~ State .Route 2~ (cot. Ma/n Rd, & Youn~s Ave.) Southo]d, NY Telephone: 631 ~/65-1938 F~x: 631 765-3136 June 30, 2009 Blank M~ Lou~,e &Ors Attn: Jarrles P. Latham P.O. Box 45~ .Orient, N~' 11957 Dear Mr. Latham! The Town of 8outl~old rece~d~'launched the. Illicit Discharge, Mapping Preject as a means to comply with Pha.'e'll of the. New York State MunlCipai',,.~Pera~e storm Sewer S~stem. (MS4) Program.and NetionaJ.F'ollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). requirements. Specifically, we must IclenffY and map all storrnwater struolures (catch basins, ouffall$, and recha~le basins) within our municipality. In order to eccUmteN assess Ihs drainage system in our town, we must gain acce~ t~ private subdlvlslc~l$. A letler granting the Town of Soulhold permlSSlort I~ conduct su~,eys in your nelghb~llood w~uld help to produce ~ most acc~r&;.e data set possible. Your [x~cecation is greetly appcecie~ as we dedicate our effort' to eliminatii~g illicit di~flarg~s to our waters and within our community, Lettem may be emailed to meaghan.burke(~town, southold.nY, us m mailed to: Town Hall A~nex 54375 Stale Route 25 P.O. Box' 1179 Southold, NY 11971. please f~fl fl'ee to contact the Town Planning Board wit'~ any questions at (631) 765-1938. Sincerely, i Storm Water Run-Off COMMITTEE SCOTF A. RUSSELL (SUPERVISOR) ALBERT KRUPSKI, Jr. (COUNCILMAN) VINCENT ORLANDO (COUNCILMAN) JAMES KING (SHELFISH INDUSTRY) JILL DOHERTY (TOWN TRUSTEE) ROBERT GHOSIO, Jr. (TOWN TRUSTEE) JAMES McMAHON (PUBLIC WORKS) PETER HARRIS (HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT) JAMES A. R1CHTER (ENGINEERI/qG DEPT.) LORNE BROUSSEAU (MARINE SCIENCE) MARK TERRY (PLANNING DEPARTMENT) JOHN SEPENOSKI (LWRP) DEAN SAMBACH (COMMUNITY LBASON) JOHANNA NORTHAM (COMMUNITY LEASON) STORM WATER RUN-OFF COMMITTEE AGENDA July 30, 2009 SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL, P.O. Box 1179 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (631)-765-1800 Fax. (631)7765-9015 * NOI - Preparation of NOI for submission to Town Board for comment & approval Formal Submission to DEC due in September 2009 * MS4 - Update of Mapping Project Megan Burk / John Sepenoski / Mark Terry * Drainage Problem Areas / Storm Water Run-off Kathleen Bauer, 12710 Soundview Avenue (Town Road Run-off entering her property) Young's Avenue, Southold (Acquisition of Property to expand the Drainage at Old North Road) (Water, Gravel, Debris coming from Farm Field) Silvermere Road - Greenport (Floo~ting of Residential Lot) * Mitchell Easement- Town Attorney's Office 1630TownHarborlane- (Constmction ofa formal Leaching Field) SCTM #: 1000-65-01-02 * Old Business * New Business Schedule 36.69' ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT POINT OF BEGINNING .., ~...~ PIPE ~T HAS BEEN CAPPED BY THE ~ SCHE~TIC S~TE PLA~~ ~ ~' SILVEREMERE ROAD - SCTM#: 1000-47-06-08 Scare 1" = 80' Youngs, Ave Drainage From Farm Field scale 1"= 150' New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Phase Il SPDES General Permit forStorm Water Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), GP-0-08-002 Notice of Intent (NO1) Submission of this Notice of Intent (NOI) constitutes notice that the entity identified in Section A of this form intends to be authorized by the NYS DEC SPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), GP-0--08-002. Submission of the NOI also constitutes notice that the party identified in Section A of this form has read, understands, and meets the eligibility conditions of Part 1.A. of GP-0-08-002; agrees to comply with all applicable terms and conditions of GP-04)8-002; end understands that continued authorization under the SPDES MS4 General Permit GP-0-08-002 is contingent on maintaining eligibility for coverage. In order to be granted coverage, all information required on this form must be completed. Please read GP-0-08-002 and make sure you comply with all permit requirements including the requirement to develop, document, and implement a Storm Water Management Plan. SECTION A. MS4 INFORMATION A. Municipality (MS4) Phone B. MS4 Type Traditional Land Use Traditional Non-Land Use. Non-Traditional Control Control © Town © County 0 Federal © Village © State © City © School District © Fire District © Other C. Principal Executive Officer or Ranking Elected Official: First Name Title Last Name Phone eMail Illllllllllllltl Illtllllll.lllllllll D. Stormwater Program Coordinator: First Name Last Name Title Phone eMail L Page i of 12 J 9459396027 E. NOI Preparer: First Name Title Last Name Phone D~artm~nt eMail F. Cooperating Partners (identify contractors/panners that will be assisting with and/or implementing any aspect of your Stormwater Management Program): Contractor/Partner Name Contact First Name Contact Last Name IIIIIl[lll[llllll, lllllllll.lltltltlll Address Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Phone eMail Contractor/Partner Name Contact First Name Contact Lam Name Address iitll State - Phone eMail IIIl'lltllllllllllll.lllllIIllllltllll Page 2 of 12 .~ 7697396029 F. Cooperating Partners (continued): Contractor/Partner Name Contact First Name Contact Last Name Address' Phone eMail Contractor/Partner Name Contact First Name Contact Last Name Address ICitll I I I I I I I I I t I [ I 111 I I I Phone eMail tltllll, llltlllllllllllllllllllll,llll Contractor/Partner Name Contact First Name Address Itl I11111111 IC'tlllllltllll. l Phone eMail Illllll[lllll Contact Last Name Page 3 of 12 2420396028 SECTION B. LOCAL WATER QUALITY INFORMATION Does the MS4 discharge to Impaired Waters as listed in GP-0-08-002~ Appendix 2? (2) Yes (2) No IN7c if ITiirei Wlateis ti wiichlthelM~4 disciargis:I Does the MS4 discharge to/within an Improvement Strategy Watershed? (See GP-0-08-002 Pa_rt III B.2) 0 Yes 0 No Name of Improvement Strategy Watershed to/within which the MS4 discharges: © New York City East of Hudson River Watershed © Onondaga Lake Watershed © Greenwood Lake Watershed © Oyster Bay Watershed © Peconie Estuary Pathogen Watershed © Pcconic Estuary Nitrogen Watershed SECTION C. INITIAL IDENTIFICATION OF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 1. Public Education and Outreach on Storm Water Impacts Outreach Techniques /dentlfy POCs, waterbodies of concern, geographic areas of concern geographic areas of concern, target audiences (required) Develop and implement an ongoing public education and outreach program (required) Economic incentives Management Prac~ces to Encourage Page 4 of 12 _~ 2770396026 2. Public Involvement and Involvement T&ckniques O Comply with State Open Meetings law and local pablir notice requirements (required) O Develop and implement a public Luvolvement/participmion program (required) O Identify a local stormwator pubilc contact; publish in o ut reach]participation nmtorlals (required) O Present annual report publicly, provide public notice (required) O Include responses to comments with annual report to NYS DEC (required) O Ensure that annual report and SWMp Plan are available for public inspection (required) OOther.-I I I I [I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I [ I Participation Activities OOtha-s... I I I/I I I t I I I t I I J I I I I I I I I t I I 3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination De~eetion and Elimination .4c~ivities Tvt~es of Disckarg~ to Target 0 Develop, implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges to the MS4 (required) O Outfall and storm sewershed boundary mapping (required) O Field verify outfalis (required) C Ouffall reconnaissance inventory (required) C P?hibis illicit discharges (required) O Public, employees, busine~.ses informed of hazards of illicit discharge (required) 0 Failing se~ic system~ 0 Illegal dumping OOt~... I I I I [ I I I I I I I I I I I[I I I I I I I 0 Adopt and enforce local law to prohibit illicit discharges (required for traditional MS4s) O Adopt available mechanisms to prohibit illicit discharges (required) O Sy~om mapping O Address exempt non-sthrmwater discharges (See GP-0-08-002 Part I.A~2) as necessary O Dye testing O Shoreline surveys O System inspections Oother._ll II Illl Ill Illll I Iltll II II II II I Ill Program Ctqtetqa NYS DEC Ouffall and System Mapping Requirements for Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) assistance document Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination: A Guidance Manual for Program Developn~nt and Technical Assessment (EPA/Center for Watershed Protection) L Page 5 of 12 _~ 3288396021 4. Construction Site Runoff Control Construction Pro, ram Requirements Develop, implement, and enforce a program that provides protection equivalent to GP-0-08-001 or GP-02-01 (required for traditional land use control MS4s) Local law/regulatory mechanism equivalent to NYS DEC Sample Local Law for Stornnvater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control (required for traditional land use control MS,Is) Document/certify equivalence of local law (required for traditional land use control MS4s) Require SWPPPs that meet up-to-dato NYS DEC erosion and sediment control technical standards (required for traditional land use control MS4s) Require construction site operators to implement erosion and sediment controls as per up-to-dato NYS DEC technical standards (required for traditional land use control MS4s) Procedures for SWPPP review and issuance of SWPPP Axceptance Form (required for traditional land use control MS4s) Educate construction site owner/operators about the MS4s construction stormwater requirements (required) Ensure construction site operators receive erosion and sediment control training (required) lnventor~ of active construction sites (required) Other... I I I I I Program Criteria Page 6 of 12 _~ 6801396025 $. Post-Construction Stormwater Management Post-Construction Program Requirements Develop, implement, and enforce a program that provides protection equivalent to GP-0-08%01 or GP%2-01 (required for traditional land use control MS4s) Local iow/regulatory mechanism equivalent to NYS DEC Sample Local Law for Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control (required for Waditional land use control MS4S) Docurnent/certify equivalence of local law (required for traditional land use control MS4s) Structural and non-structural management practices (required for traditional land use control MS4s) Procedures for SWPPP review and issuance of SWPPP Acceptance Form (required for traditional land use control MS4s) O Bett~r Site Design Ducurc~nt O Deep Ripping and D~comlmction O Credits 0 Inventory of post-construction stornnvater management practices (required) O Ensure long-term operation and maintenance of post-construction stormwater management practices (required) 0 Provide adequate resources for inspection and enforcement (required for traditional land use control MS4s) 6. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations O Develop and implement a pollution prevention program that addresses operations and facilities that contribute Pollutants of Concern to the MS4 (required) O Assess all operations addressed by the SWMP every three years (required) O Employee pollution prevention training (required) O Require third party contractors to certify that the services/activities they perform meet GP-0-08-002 requirements (required) Pro, ram Cri~,'ia O NYS Pollution Prevention and Goed Housekeeping Assistance Document Oot~...I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O Require operations and facilities other~4se subject to the NYS Multi-sector General Permit (MSGP, GP-0-06-002) to prepare and implement provi~lans in the SWMP that comply with PARTS III.A, C, D, J, K, L and Part IV of the MSGP (required) O Street Maintenance O Bridge Maintenance O Winter Road Maintenance O Salt Storage O Solid Waste Management O New Municipal Construction and Land Disturbance O Right of Way Maintenance O Marine Operations O Hydraulic Habitat Modification O Parks and Open Space O Municipal Building O Stornmater System Maintenance O Vehicle and Fleet Maintenance O Other Page 7 of 12 4155396025 SECTION D. INITIAL IDENTIFICATION OF OF ADDITIONAL WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) (Sec GP-0-08-002 Part III.B.2.A-D, and Appendices 3-8) NEW YORK CITY EAST OF HUDSON WATERSHED MS4s 0 Educational program concerning the impacts of phosphorus on waterbodles (required) 0 Map of entire MS4 conveyance system (required) 0 Program to ensure that on-site wastewater treatment systems are inspected and maintained once every three years (required for tradifional MS4s) O Develop, implement, and enforce a program, equivalent to GP-0-08-001, to reduce poRntants in stormwater runoff to the MS4 from construction activities that result in a land disturbance of five thousand square feet (required for traditional land use control MS4s) O Ensure, through local law or other regulatory mechanism, that post-construction stormwater management controls are in accordance with the New York State Stormwater Design Manual and the Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Design Standards (required for traditional land use control MS4S) O Retrofit Program to correct or reduce existing erosion and/or pollutant loading problems, with emphasis on phosphorus (requite, d) O Stormwater Conveyance System Inspection and Maintenance Program (required) 0 Turf management practices and procedures policy (required) OTHER PHOSPHORUS WATERSHED MS4s 0 Educational program concerning the Impact~ of phosphorus on ~vaterhodle~ (required) 0 Program to ensure that on-site wastevrater treatment systems are inspected and maintained once every three years (required for traditional MS4s in the Greenwood Lake Watershed) O Require the use of the Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Design Standards in accordance with the New York S~ate Storrmvater Design Manual (required for tradl~i0nal land use control MS4s) O Retrofit Program to correct or reduce existing erosion and/or pollutant loading problems, with emphasis on phosphorus (required) 0 Turf management practices and procedures policy (required) PATHOGEN IMPAIRED WATERSHED MS4s 0 Educational program concerning the impacts of pathogens on ~vaterbodles (required) O Program to ensure that on-site wastewater treatment systems are inspected and maintained once every three years (required for traditional MS4S O Retrofit Program to correct or reduce pollutant loading problems, with emphasis on pathogens (required) O Local'iow prohibiting pet ~ste on municipal properties and prohibiting goose feeding (required) O Pet eoste bag program (required) O Program to manage goose populations (required) NITROGEN IMPAIRED WATERSHED MS4s O Educational program concerning the Impac~ of nitrogen on waterhodies (required) O Program to ensure that on-site wastewater treatment systetm are inspected and nmintalned once every three years (required for traditional MS4s) O Retrofit Program to correct or reduce existing erosion and/or pollutant loading problems, with emphasis on nitrogen (required) O Turf management practices and procedures policy (required) Page 8 of 12 _~ 8583396024 SECTION E. INITIAL IDENTIFICATION OF MEASURABLE GOALS Public Education and Outreach measurable goals, start and end date~, include work to be done by partners 2. Fdblic ]nvolvemenl/Par ticipatJo n measurable goals, start and end dates, include work to be done by partners L Pa~e 9 of 12 _~ 5190396025 SECTION E. INITIAL IDENTIFICATION OF MEASURABLE GOALS Construction Site Runoff Control measurable goals, start and end dates, indicate work to be done by parmers 5. Post-Construction Stormwater Management measurable goals, start and end dates, include work to be done by partners 6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping measurable goals, start and end dates, include work tn be done by partners L Page 10 of 12 J 8613396028 SECTION F. CERTIFICATION I certify under panalty of law that this documem and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in . accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persops who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, I certify that the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. First Name MI Last Name Title S ignature L Page 11 of 12 0426396022 Instructions for Completing the Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under the NYS DEC SPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), GP-0-08-002 Who MUst File a Notice of Intent? Under the provisions of ~402(p) of the C~ean Water Act (CWA) and regulations at 40 CFR Part 122, Federal law prohibits "point source" discharges of storm water from municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) to waters of the U.S. without a State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit. If you are an operator of a regulated small MS4 designated under §122.32(a)(1) or §122.32(a)(2)tysu must apply for coverage under GP-0-08-002, a new individual permit or apply for a modification of an existing individual SPDES permit. When to File the NOI Form DO NOT FILE THE NOI UNTIL YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NYS DEC SPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), GP-0-08-002. You will need to determine your eligibility, prepare your storm water management plan, and correcUy ansWer all questions on the NOI form, all of which must be done before you can sign the certification statement on the NOI in good faith (and without risk of committing perjury). The NOI must be submitted in accordance with the deadlines established in GP-0-88-802 Part II.B.la. where to File the NOI Form Submit the NOI, signed in accordance with GP-0-08-O02, Part VI.J.1, to: Notice of Intent NYSDEC, Bureau of Water Permits 625 Broadway, 4th Flour Albany, NY 12233-3505 Completing the NOI Form To complete this form, type or print, in the appropriate areas only. Please make sure you have completely tilled out every section of this form and have retained a copy for your records before sending the completed form to the address above. Section A. MS4 Owner/Operator Information 1. Provide the legal name of the governmental entity, or other legal entity that operates the MS4 described In this application. Provide the mailing address of the MS4 operator. Include the street address or PO Box, city, state, and zip code. NI correspondence regarding the permit will be sent to this address. Identity the Principal Executive Officer or Ranking Elected Official. The principal executive officer includes (1) the chief executive officer of the municipal entity, or (2) a senior executive having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency. Identity the Stormwater Management P;ogram (SWMP) Coordinator. The Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) Coordinator is athe porsou responsible for the I mp]emen tetionlcoordinatlon of the SWMP within the MS4. List the contractors or partners that will be assisting you with and/or implementing any aspect of your SWMP. Describe the sewice, activity, or work to be performed. Indicate the schedule for implementation. Section B. Local Water Quality Information 1. Identify any waters listed In Appendix 2 to which the MS4 discharges. (See GP-0-08-802 Part III B.1) 2. Identify the Improvement Strategy Watershed te/wlthln which the MS4 discharges, If any. (See GP-8-08-002 Part III B.2. A-D, and Appendices 3-8) Section C. Initial Identification of Best Management Practices (BMPs) 1. Check the management practices that you have selected to meet the requirements for each Minimum Control Measure. Management practices listed In BOLD type are required and MUST be checked. FOR COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENTS, PLEASE REFER TO GP-8-08-002. Attach additional pages as necessary. Section D. Initial Identification of Additional Improvement Strategy WaterShed Best Management Practices 1. MS4 germittees within Improvement Strategy Watersheds shall modity their SWMPa to meet the odd~onal requirements as set forth In GP-0-88-802 Part IX. The best management practices for each Improvement strategy watershed listed in Section D of the NOI are required of MS4s that discharge to/within those Watersheds. (See GP-0-08-802 Part III.B.2.A-D. and Appendlcse 3-8) Section E. Initial Identification of Measurable Goals 1. Provide a narrative description of the measurable goals, with start and end dates, that will be used for each best management practice for each of the minimum control measures. Indicate the month and year in which you will start and fully implement each of the minimum control measures, or indicate the frequency of the action In the description. Attach additional pages as necessary. Section F. Certification 1. Certification statement and signature. (CAUTION: An unsigned or undated NOI form will prevent the granting of permit coverage.) Federal statutes provide for severe penalties for submitting false information on this application form. Federal regulations require this application to be s]gnod by either a principal executive or rankthg elected official as described in Part VI.J. of the NYS DEC SPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), GP-0-88-002. Page 12 of 12