Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEIS January 2009 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK December 2007 Revised May 27, 2008 Revised Sept. 18, 2008 Revised Jan. 2009 4 �Le Tm/ GREENMAN-PEDERSEN INC. ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BABYLON,NEW YORK • DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK PROJECT LOCATION: 45.99 Acre located at the north side of the Griffing Street and Schoolhouse Lane intersection in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBER: District 1000- Section 102- Block 01- Lot 33.3 APPLICANT: The Heritage at Cutchogue, LLC 1721-D North Ocean Avenue Medford, NY 11763 LEAD AGENCY: Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 • Southold,NY 11971 PREPARER AND CONTACT: This Draft Environmental Impact Statement was Prepared by: Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Engineers, Architects and Engineers 325 West Main Street Babylon,NY 11702 Contact: Robert Grover, Director, Environmental and Coastal Sciences (631) 587-5060 • i With technical input from: Nelson and Pope Engineers and Surveyors 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Charles W. Kuehn, Architect P.O. Box 641 Northport, New York 11768 631262-8540 DATE OF PREPARATION: December 2007 Revised May 27, 2008 Revised September, 18, 2008 • Revised January 2009 AVAILABILITY OF DOCUMENT: This document represents a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (-DEIS")prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.9. Copies are available for public review and comment at the offices of the lead agency. DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS: • ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1.1 Project Background, Need, Objectives and Benefits................................1 1.1.1 Background and History....................................................................1 1.1.2 Public Need and Municipality Objectives.........................................3 1.1.3 Objectives of the Project Sponsor......................................................3 1.1.4 Benefits of the Project........................................................................4 1.2 Location and Site Conditions......................................................................4 1.3 Project Design and Layout..........................................................................4 1.3.1 Overall Site Layout............................................................................5 1.3.2 Grading and Drainage........................................................................7 1.3.3 Access, Road System and Parking.....................................................8 1.3.4 Sanitary Disposal and Water Supply.................................................9 1.3.5 Site Landscaping and Lighting .........................................................12 1.3.6 Open Space........................................................................................13 1.4 Construction and Operation.......................................................................13 1.4.1 Construction ......................................................................................13 1.4.2 Operation............................................................................................15 • 1.5 Permits and Approvals Required...............................................................16 2.0 NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 2.1 Soils................................................................................................................17 2.1.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................17 2.1.2 Anticipated Impacts...........................................................................19 2.1.3 Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................21 2.2 Water Resources ..........................................................................................22 2.2.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................22 2.2.2 Anticipated Impacts...........................................................................23 2.2.3 Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................26 2.3 Vegetation and Wildlife...............................................................................27 2.3.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................27 2.3.2 Anticipated Impacts...........................................................................28 2.3.3 Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................28 3.0 HUMAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 3.1 Transportation.............................................................................................30 3.1.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................32 3.1.2 Anticipated Impacts...........................................................................39 3.1.3 Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................44 3.2 Land Use,Zoning and Plans.......................................................................44 • 3.2.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................44 3.2.2 Anticipated Impacts...........................................................................48 iii 3.2.3 Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................52 • 3.3 Community Facilities and Services ............................................................52 3.3.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................52 3.3.2 Anticipated Impacts ...........................................................................54 3.3.3 Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................56 3.4 Aesthetic Resources, Open Space/Community Character and Public Health............................................................................................................56 3.4.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................56 3.4.2 Anticipated Impacts...........................................................................58 3.4.3 Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................61 3.5 Historic and Archaeological Resources .....................................................62 3.5.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................62 3.5.2 Anticipated Impacts...........................................................................63 3.5.3 Proposed Mitigation...........................................................................64 4.0 OTHER REQUIRED SECTIONS....................................................................................65 4.1 Cumulative Impacts.....................................................................................65 4.2 Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided...............................................66 4.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources.......................67 4.4 Growth-Inducing Aspects ...........................................................................68 5.0 ALTERNATIVES..........................................................................................................69 5.1 Alternative 1 and 4 - No Action Alternative/Public Acquisition)............71 • 5.2 Alternative 2 - Clustered Alternative.........................................................72 5.3 Alternative 3 - Decreased Number of Units...............................................85 5.4 Alternative 5 -Alternative Design for Wastewater ..................................99 6.0 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................102 APPENDICES A. SEORA DOCUMENTATION AND CORRESPONDENCE A-1 Environmental Assessment Review, Suffolk Environmental Consulting. Inc. A-2 SEOR Positive Declaration Town of Southold Planning Board, July 16, 2007 A-3 Final Scope Town of Southold Planning Board, September 10, 2007 B. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY C. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND RENDERINGS C-1 Architectural Floor Plans, Charles W. Kuehn, Architect, Last Revised November, 2006 Sheet A-1 N First Floor Plan, Units A-E (8.5 x 11) Sheet A-1 N First Floor Sheet A-2 N Second Floor Sheet A-3 N Lower Level Sheet A-4 - Elevations iv C-2. Architectural Renderings C-3 Existing Multifamily Development Character Comparison • D. ECOLOGICAL INVENTORY E. SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ASSOCIATED SOIL REPORTS E-1. Pesticide Report,Nelson & Pone November 8 2007 E-2. Soil Management Plan Nelson &Pope July 23 2008 F. WATER RESOURCES F-1. Groundwater Analysis, Casola Well Drilling March 22 2002 F-2. BURBS Model, Existing Site Conditions F-3. BURBS Model, Proposed Proiect F-4. BURBS Model, Alternative 2 N Cluster Alternative F-5. BURBS Model, Altemative 3 N Reduced Number of Units F-6. BURBS Model,Altemative 5 NAltemative Design for Wastewater Treatment G. CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT,Tracker Archaeology October 2007 H. COMMUNITY SERVICES COORDINATION I. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence with the Town of Southold Attorney's Office • Regarding Zoning,March 29, 2007 Correspondence with the Applicant's Attorney and the Town Planning Board, July 16,2007 Real Estate Valuation for Area of Proposed Easement,Andrew Stype Realty,Inc. October 3, 2007 Existing Tax Information for the Subject Property Correspondence with the New York State Natural Heritage Program, December 24, 2007 Correspondence to the Town of Southold Planning Board April 30, 2008 PLATES Plate 1 Site Plans for the Proposed Proiect,Nelson & Pope Last Revised 9/15/2008 Sheet 2 of 27 N Site Plan N Aligmnent Sheet 3 of 27 N Site Plan N Grading Sheet 4 of 27 N Site Plan NUtility Plan Sheet 22 of 27 N Lighting Plan Sheet 22A of 27 N Partial Lighting Plan Sheet 22B of 27 NPartial Lighting Plan Sheet 22C of 27 NPartial Lighting Plan Sheet 23 of 27 N Erosion Control Plan Sheet 23A of 27 N Erosion Control Details v Sheet 24 of 27 NTest Boring Locations • Sheet 25 of 27 N Existing Resources and Slone Analysis Plan Sheet 25A of 27 N Headwall Sections Sheet 3 of ION Overall Sanitary Plan Sheet 1 of 1 N Fire apparatus Access Plan Plate 2 Landscape Plans, Charles W. Kuehn, Architect, Last Revised August 2006 Plate 3 Yield Map,Nelson &Pope. Last Revised 11/17/2008 Plate 4 Conceptual Plan for Alternative 2.Alternate Site Plan,Nelson& Pope, Last Revised 4/21/2008 Plate 5 Conceptual Plan for Alternative 3,Alternate Alignment Plan Nelson & Pope, Last Revised 7/16/2008 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Unit Type and Composition...........................................................................5 Table 1-2 Site and Project Characteristics NExisting and Proposed Conditions...........6 Table 1-3 Parking Requirement .....................................................................................10 • Table 1-4 Total Wastewater Generation ........................................................................11 Table 1-5 Permits and Approvals...................................................................................16 Table2-1 Site Soils........................................................................................................18 Table 2-2 Estimate of Nitrogen Loading of Groundwater Using BURGS Model.........25 Table 3-1 Intersection Geometry....................................................................................34 Table 3-2 Accident Summary by Geometry...................................................................36 Table 3-3 Existing Conditions Level of Service............................................................37 Table3-4 Trip Generation..............................................................................................40 Table 3-5 Level of Service Summary.............................................................................41 Table 3-6 Existing Tax Revenue.............................................. 53 Table 3-7 Anticipated Tax Revenue.................................................. 55 Table 5-1 Comparison of Alternatives...........................................................................70 Table 5-2 Total Wastewater Generation Alternative 2 ..................................................74 Table 5-3 Total Wastewater Generation Alternative 3 ..................................................88 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1-1 Zoning Map ...................................................................................................4 Figure1-2 Location Map.................................................................................................4 Figure 1-3 Alignment Plan..............................................................................................5 Figure 1-4 Water Main Map ...........................................................................................12 • Figure 2-1 Soils Map.......................................................................................................18 Figure 2-2 Groundwater Contour Map............................................................................23 Figure 2-3 Local Private Wells Map ...............................................................................23 A Figure 2-4 Ecological Community Map..........................................................................27 Figure 3-1 Photosimulation Location Maro 58 • Figure 5-1 Altemative 2 Site Plan...................................................................................70 Figure 5-2 Alternative 3 Site Plan...................................................................................85 • • vii 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION • 1.1 Project Background,Need, Objectives and Benefits 1.1.1 Background and History This document is a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) prepared for a site plan application for a 45.99 acre property (the current survey, made with the latest electronic measuring equipment for enhanced accuracy, shows the acreage reduced from 46.17 acres to 45.99 acres) located in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, New York. The applicant for the project is The Heritage at Cutchogue, LLC ("applicant"). The property is zoned residential HD (Hamlet Density), which permits I unit per 10,000 square feet (SF) with community water and sewer. Letter from Town Attorney on Zoning is located in Appendix I. An application for the Heritage at Cutchogue site plan was submitted to the Town of Southold Planning Board (-Planning Board") on July 21, 2006. This application is for development of a Planned 55+ Active Adult Community consisting of 139 detached and attached dwellings, 14 of which will be set aside in perpetuity as affordable. The units, ranging from ±1,135 SF to±3,110 SF, are comprised of 1 I 1 single family detached units, 14 attached single family duplex units and 14 attached multifamily units which will be offered as affordable. Access to the site is proposed via the construction of an entrance road from the intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street to Spur Road, located • at the southern portion of the property. The internal project roads are designed as a meandering loop around a central water feature, designed with the intention to provide traffic calming and additional privacy to the individual units within the community. Amenities including a community building with an indoor and outdoor pool, tennis courts, gazebo and gate house are proposed mainly in the southeastern portion of the site. The central water feature will be utilized both as an aesthetic feature and for collection of surface water runoff generated by the development. Public water will be extended to service the proposed project and on site sanitary systems are proposed in accordance with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Health Code. The proposed site design will provide ±24 acres of landscaped areas between and along rows of buildings and within the site development, as well as provide a fully vegetated berm of evergreen plantings (a minimum of 3' in height), along the majority of the southwestern property line and a portion of the northwest property line. Site coverages and further details of the project are provided in Section 1.3 below and the proposed site plans (included as Plate 1 at the end of the document). Prior to the current application, the property had been farmed, and during the early 1980's, the property was zoned A-Residential-Agricultural. The owner of the site at that time, Leisure Greens Associates filed for a rezoning of the site from A-Residential- Agricultural to M Light-Multiple Residence in February 1983, and the rezoning was granted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold in July 1983. In September 1983, a company by the name of Seacroft, Ltd. purchased the property and agricultural activity • was ceased. In April 1984, a preliminary sketch plan for 160 senior condominium units was submitted, followed by a request for site plan approval in October 1984. In review of the project, the Planning Board assumed lead agency and issued a Positive Declaration 1 in November 1984. The site plan was denied in January 1985, as the application was incomplete. The owner filed a petition in New York State Supreme Court in protest of • the Planning Board denial, but the Planning Board was upheld in a decision in March 1988 finding that a DEIS must be prepared for the project. A subsequent applicant Nocro, Ltd. filed an application for a 160 unit project consisting of 40, 4-unit complexes on the property. A DEIS was accepted in 1989, but the SEQRA process and site plan approval was not completed. The current applicant, the Heritage at Cutchogue, LLC, is in contract with Nocro, Ltd. to purchase the property. The Heritage at Cutchogue started planning the project in 2003 as a 201-unit townhouse development. The property had been rezoned to HD-Hamlet Density residential as a result of Town modifications to the zoning law and official zoning map. The applicant filed with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) and the Suffolk County Sewer Agency (SCSA) for conceptual certification of a Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) for the 201-unit project, notifying the Town of Southold in November 2004 of the application. Through review, the project was reduced to 150 units and re-filed with the Town of Southold on June 15, 2005. The review of environmental consequences of an action is regulated by Part 617, Title 6 of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6NYCRR Part 617), as promulgated under the NYS Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). Under SEQRA, an agency which grants, funds or approves an action must determine the environmental consequences of its decision. In 2006, through discussions with the Planning Board, the project was again downsized to 139 units and age restricted (see correspondence from • applicant's attorney in Appendix I. The Planning Board, after completing a coordinated review, assumed lead agency in December 2006. This project most closely resembles the currently proposed project as will be described in subsequent sections. The reduced project size obviated the need for an STP, and as a result, on-site sanitary systems were proposed. After assuming lead agency, the Town of Southold Planning Board consulted Suffolk Environmental to review the application and issue recommendations regarding SEQRA. A copy of this review is included in Appendix A. Subsequently, the Planning Board issued a Positive Declaration on July 16, 2007, requiring the preparation of this DEIS (also included in Appendix A). Subsequent to the issuance of the Positive Declaration, a public scoping process was initiated, which culminated in the Final Scoping document (see Appendix A), on which this document is based. This DEIS addresses those areas of concern expressed by the Lead Agency and the public in regard to the potential impacts of the proposed project to the environmental resources of the site and area. The scope of this DEIS addresses those items specified in the Positive Declaration and has been prepared by the applicant to fully disclose impacts and mitigation measures of the proposed project. Future stages of review of the proposed project include: review and acceptance of the DEIS with respect to scope and adequacy; a public hearing on the DEIS; preparation of a Final EIS, which responds to agency and public comments received during the DEIS review period; preparation and acceptance of the Findings Statement by the Lead Agency, and the Town Planning Board decision on the application, after their review of the Final EIS and in consideration of the Findings Statement. • 2 • 1.1.2 Public Need and Municipality Objectives As reflected in the Town Zoning Code §280-1, HD zoning was implemented to provide mixed housing uses and higher residential density in appropriate areas. Specifically, the code states the following: -The purpose of the Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District is to permit a mix of housing types and level of residential density appropriate to the areas in and around the major hamlet centers,particularly Mattituck, Cutchogue, Southold,Orient and the Village of Greenport." The proposed project will provide for the development of a permanent, high-quality use on a property consistent with the site's existing Hamlet Density Zoning. The Heritage at Cutchogue project will provide a mix of housing units (one, two and three bedroom attached and detached units ranging from ±1,137 SF to±3,110 SF) with 10 percent of the units offered as moderate-income family units, pursuant to the §280-137E of the Town Code. Sections 280-137E and §240-1OB(2)(c) of the Town Code require that all residential site plans involving the creation of five or more lots set aside 25 percent of the lot yield as moderate-income family dwelling units (MIFDU). This requirement can be met either by building the required MIFDU units (25 percent of the yield) or by • constructing no less than 10 percent of the yield as MIFDU units and paying a sum to the Town of Southold Housing Fund or providing development rights equal to the number of required MIFDU lots not constructed in the project. The applicant has chosen to construct 10 percent of the units and pay the fee to the Town's Housing Fund; therefore the proposed project meets the Town's affordable housing goals pursuant to Sections 280-137E and §240-1 O13(2)(c) of the Town Code. The applicant also agreed to restrict the community to a senior community for individuals 55 years and older at the suggestion of the Planning Board in order to reduce potential impacts associated with traffic generation and potential impacts to the school district. The project as proposed will increase tax revenue to the school district without increasing the demand for services as will be demonstrated in this DEIS (see Section 3.3.2). Therefore, the proposed residential project will meet the Town's objectives by providing a permanent use of an underutilized property in conformance with Town zoning regulations and provide the benefit of generating significant additional tax revenues without generating a significant increase in the need for services. 1.1.3 Objectives of the Project Sponsor The applicants' objectives are to develop the subject property in accordance with all Town of Southold zoning requirements and objectives, and in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Town of Southold Comprehensive Plan. . It is also the objective of the applicant to realize a reasonable return on their investment and to be able to use their property in an appropriate, legal manner. 3 1.1.4 Benefits of the Project • The benefits of the proposed project are the fulfillment of the Town's vision for the subject property as expressed in the Town of Southold Comprehensive Plan and zoning code. Further discussion of the Comprehensive Plan and the projects conformance to the Plan are provided in Section 3.2. The fulfillment of the Town's visions for this site will be the maintaining of the zoning in place for this site, as is the case of this project. This project will be fully consistent with the Town of Southold Comprehensive Plan. This is shown in the zoning maps Figure 1-1. This project will also be a substantial generation of tax revenues for the Town. Additional benefits, as detailed in Sections 2.2 and 2.3, involve the extension of public water to 52 homes and businesses in the Hamlet to the south/southeast of the project site and the elimination of a major regional invasive plant seed bank. 1.2 Location and Site Conditions The proposed site is located at the Northwest Corner of Griffing Street and Schoolhouse Lane in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY (SCTM: 1000- 102-01-33.3). The proposed site is currently a 45.99-acre parcel of fallow farm field and wooded lands. Currently the site is zoned Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District. This zoning meets the minimum standards for 1 family detached dwellings. A location map is provided in Figure 1-2. • 1.3 Project Design and Layout The proposed project involves the construction of 139 attached and detached age restricted units on the 45.99 acre property. The property is zoned residential HD (Hamlet Density), which permits 1 unit per 10,000 square feet (SF) with community water and sewer. A Yield Map was prepared for the property (see Plate 3), which demonstrates the property will yield 150 lots (10,000 SF lot minimum) including a sewage treatment plant (STP). The site will be serviced by public water and as documented by correspondence from the Town Attorney (see Appendix I) and detailed in Section 1.3.4 below, construction of the STP is not required pursuant to Health Department requirements because the units will be restricted by Covenants and Restrictions to a senior community (age 55 and older). The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) wastewater design flows for senior age restricted units are half that of single family dwellings; therefore the wastewater generation for the proposed project will not exceed the Population Density Equivalent pursuant to Article 6 and an on site treatment plant is not required. Therefore, the 139 units proposed under the proposed action is a density less than that permitted under the HD zoning. The proposed 139 units, ranging from ±1,135 SF to ±3,110 SF in size, are comprised of 111 single family detached units, 14 attached single family duplex units and 14 attached multifamily units which will be offered as affordable. A total of 131 buildings are • proposed including a proposed community building and maintenance garage in the southeastern portion of the site. The units include a mixture of one to three bedrooms, 4 GPI Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. E.a» R_w4 1;h R-40 .. AC AC R-80,11 Ll0 AREA OF PROPOSED PROJECT •` AC -`; HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE A, % AC R-84 RAO p1 Gam. '' •s w i _ 13 1 R'8� / ,..✓ �� --i� /J r ,- �`r..,, --- t. f R-QQ s,� -y 5 17210 NORTH OCEANVENUE �' 'max. 'I z MEDFORD,NEW YORK 11763 B RAO R R-SO i • - " .. AC � S` Y p r ,r r /M4 M a R-40 `ff.f R-SO 1s, �1 - 4_ R-40 { CU CHOGUE NEW VOORK PPP r t - R-4V - . - _.. -� c:R 4 Oe-ax'.a C*n✓[.. A ) yg a.q l` v xY- una.ascnGm+.c `J CL� _ zk1JC H.nacs4a ar •ar�. - "'�..��r� p ,/ i 1]A SY..MRraW^Yv }. Ue is Ilk S% f ZONING MAP Town of Southold Section I of 4 New Zoning Map Adopted x,2.12-07 _.KA by Southold Town Board on November 30, 2004 as , , =<oo ceG • Local Law No. 23 of 2004 R-400 o Scale: I inch = 1000 feet FIGURE 1.1 pa..m> Hog NI Cll-1 + • ° 6 •O �' @ - '^ Bay Greenman-Pedersen,Inc. 26 0 e',a • ;tax .� $ • •.• •, � •� •ke ,�, ` . � v , xX x�`�x v�i • AREA OF PROPOSED ° .i.�• , d ,: PROJECT HERITAQE ° ' •East 7 CUTPHOGUE 06 �+cv D out ' �_ \ 57 - �� ' • •n 'r :D8 , ! r• '• rr !sued eert Y °• .e- =;x o°•• •• .40 • '\ . 1 'C�1 ••• t 'N• to Bmch $ Dlstrlet Park �O a(J• a •,D• • Q. a Q® [J T H 0 L D w s i 1722;-0 No"RTH «CEANXW UTCHOGUE LE rte• o;• ° ♦' MEDFORD,NEW YORK 11783 _ be vet '. �''• ,�• _ C ? waw M • IF � Ir • •� •� �'� is a + ° t • N •A . ,,,•• •'D• UIC O e •� p GUE Cffi tehogxe 7 HEFTCHOG E.NFWORK \ + CUtCHOOUE,NEWYORIC ° .� \`, o `\ ,Q• • . -• ,:' Harbor a .xHorseaJwa Or •• \ 2d ' •' CiouitrY %4 Pt i �' 21 N. t7 + AtteI10p2M Harbor i Z b� ,• � N I a Narth Fork � K 6 32 I' • Count Club e t w Jr Srk 0 ♦ CW. Id Cove -�� S' I • � echi Club a 17 uw•n•.• fit. , •�°` _ !P K ? u...:°m` r rs r LOCATION MAP ►� J _1 7 r r e. I& M23 - '• K{1110gMei A it 1't : ... 12.12-07 KAN 9 Metdnwk ,...n° p, is 7a �y3 Ak68sv 'b 1 e °e.r: cwwar •'pt , • 8 1 -407 BG 14 ° r3 70 M arratooka 1 7 FIGURE 1.2 ;y $ Point s yo b N O R T H ACE with garage provided for all but the one bedroom units. Architectural floor plans for the • units are provided in Appendix C. Table 1-1 provides a breakdown of the various unit types and sizes. TABLE 1-1 Unit Type and Composition Mr A 47 3 ±2,647 SF B 19 2 ±1,930 SF C 20 3 12,717 SF D 18 2 ±2,725 SF E 21 2 ±3,110 SF Affordable 14 1 ±1,135 SF Totals 139 --- Site amenities include four interconnected ponds (utilized both for stormwater retention and as aesthetic features) located in the central portion of the site and in the vicinity of the recreational area, an indoor pool and outdoor pool, tennis courts, a gazebo, and a community center. Additionally, site improvements including access roadways, an on- site drainage system and extensive landscaping are proposed. Details of these features are discussed in the sections below. A reduced size Alignment Plan depicting the • locations and details of proposed site layout is provided by Figure 1-3 (full size copies of the proposed site plans are provided in pockets at the end of the text). The roadways and drainage features, open space areas, the community center, the pools, the gazebo, and the tennis courts will all be operated and maintained by a Homeowner's Association (HOA). The public space and recreational amenities proposed for the Heritage at Cutchogue development are intended for the use and enjoyment of the community's residents and their guests. 1.3.1 Overall Site Layout The site will be accessed via construction of a proposed connection road from the northwest side of Schoolhouse Lane/Griffing Street, running through the southern portion of the subject property and connecting to Spur Road. The main gated site access stems from the central portion of this access road, which then continues north into the property creating a central looped road. The internal project roads are designed as a meandering loop around the central water feature, designed with the intention to provide traffic calming and additional privacy to the individual units within the community. The units are typically located approximately 25 to 70 feet from the street, most with individual driveways, with the exception of a shared driveway proposed for six units, which will be accessed from a shared driveway in the southwest corner of the site. Sidewalks are proposed throughout the community to provide ease of access and promote safe pedestrian activity. Street trees will be provided throughout on site roadways and a fully • vegetated berm (a minimum of 3' in height) planted with evergreen vegetation is proposed along the majority of the southwestern property line and a portion of the northwest property line (see Section 1.3.5 below). 5 Two emergency access points are proposed, one on the northwestern portion of the site at • the terminus of Bridle Lane and the second on the southwestern portion of the property opposite Spur Road. Parking is provided both in garages for individual units (2 spaces/unit) and 22 off-street parking spaces adjacent to the one bedroom unit buildings for a total of 272 spaces provided for the residential units. Additionally, 57 parking stalls (including 3 handicap stalls) are provided in proximity of the recreation area. Table 1-2 provides a list of the coverages and physical characteristics of the subject site for both existing and proposed conditions. The existing coverages were determined through site inspections and analysis of aerial photographs; post development conditions are based on the Alignment Plan. The Tax information was provided by the Southold Town Assessor and is shown in Appendix I. TABLE 1-2 SITE AND PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Existing and Proposed Conditions Coverages acres --- Roads/Parking/Buildings +0.0 +17.35 Recharge Pond t0.0 +4.6 • Forest/Successional Field ±45.99 f0.0 Landscaping +0.0 ±24.04 +14.56 fertilized TOTAL ±45.99 ±45.99 Water Resources: --- Sanitary Wastewater d (1) 0.0 ±21,615 Landscape Irrigation( d)(2) 0.0 ±17,800 Total Water Use d 0.0 +39,415 Nitrogen Concentration m (3) 2.0 7.0 Miscellaneous: -- --- Solid Solid Waste Generation lbs/da (4) 0.0 +1,711 Residents(capita)(5) 0.0 +271 School-age Children(capita)(6) 0.0 0 Total Taxes $/ ear 12,378.98 375,000.00 School District Taxes($/ ear) 1 8,719.35 1 264,112.50 Notes: (1) Assuming SCDHS design flow rates of 150 gpd/unit plus 0.30 gpd/SF for 1,000 SF gym area,plus 0.06 gpd/SF for 1,500 SF of club house office/meeting area, plus 5 gpd/bather for 75 bathers in indoor& outdoor pool. (2) Assuming 5.5 inches/year for fertilizcr dependent areas. Assumes irrigation period of 4 months (mid May to mid September). (3) See Appendix F-2 and F-3. (4) Assuming 5 lbs/day/capita+ Ilb/day per bedroom (US Census), and 0.5 lbs/day/capita for club house and gym(assumes occupancy of 25 people/day)(Salvato, 1982). (5) Assuming 2 capita/unit(2 and 3 bedroom units), 1.5 capital bedroom unit(US Census). • (6) No school aged children are expected,as the units are age restricted. 6 z z z z I © OOO J J J Z) • F F H H I �Q m.x.'`�e.'�evry � � 190..160W 190 (DEED) E 5 '30'50.5 -------------------- --- -_----T;Al — _^ 46 VN1 MAP 9� \\ �O' •qq .'� nJ'. _ • • _ Nf N sc+ , 431 v "x''._ Win` •v ♦ e Y In 2... 1 e x _ f � s]>v4'w•E_ > � Mxa„ .3. . erc3ne f \ O smN o I _ e POND m- GRIFFING STREET � POND e s5ru'so•E(oEm) G i 'ry tam y ...� I �^ .o. .a S3 L.r 1 � -- :. .Fo I � xn'Ubo•w — — wa.ao' U C a � s SIGN LEGEND .R. 43654 20"W m 9YuttL Irry 2009.51'(0®) JeVE -1C — e I — _ — — — � — — I vAawm¢n•> 30DY3Y(ACNAL) _ _ vAswr E xm A 1ua J. �oiin� W I •Po... o `er I '� .� I I rxa.• wxr.lmr'"6 I I r7 Z �a Q PARKING CALCULATIONS: Imlcs Alm mrwm rmu amn n.Nls er P6VeL sv6sE]Ms. SITE DATA: ZONING DATA: RtW1e4 SITE COVERAGE: x 9Alm ua+a zm] �:Imo-lmb+-.., axat PAAetr mrralm es'axAm: x zvuxs PFP eenum Zd@.NWET NMr 4Mmlm1 xWS:xWET mJ91Y(mY SIKIF RWLY]ArrlOm lYi�1A/[ET POi MLME PbA3 2W.]e]Sf - 0 WS IµY{MPW Ip]e,m54- 'Ipi snE New im].]1121Ei-Atem2 roes ""���lOR 1 Pyr�T'am°"�� Ii4PraM�+ax6?Ms41sP.`a•V�rz°EW�uim� "°"°.Pumrc,Arm rvxJlwr 2a>prz a - ]4za smmwn PAM.rzm FNID] v,2w sv 2det MIYiP O IMe- IM 6E010fh 1.lM5.15 YrQ3/IMS-21 pIpEYT W..112m$ - LOr$M.R.) IO.mO 2MA]II4J bi-IwSM)K) mW PNWNC RYIP®M lME-x]1 mKLi ImIA\ UNIT TYPES NwmA a eamela- ul(ElnAnelc EowMr mnw Aro uuxruwcE aPra) Ia Mm(mo W21141 um 6AM(R£i) m x1 2 .L (ae6Anr CFN� NxmAaE snma ommer/• PMxr rum(eEEi) m zm axa wI]m s a ImeArmxn Puam 9CE rMm YR s s-0 s 9KCJ Pw 1mN6 RVef IF'''�� �q 1�-� �'�-'} omux9ulm uA6Aoppr zoxE ry(ms r++/raE( Mlx s¢rNOJ(P¢r) m m.o ccuuuulr axrte EFA-Ilw]s/m -w sPK[s 1 ^ 5 I E I I I 1 Kwra[vxrurc s1E PIp6 2m;31143 s/maoo s/ullr-Im uNn Ivn am(rtsrl ]u ]sa ^� rlm s/]m- sPrm "� LcyLJJ tyL,JJ 16145 Im a rn->s uMs Js uxrs x.no ao vuelE rwox Nu(s6/r.AMI em wis[RmoE uu(son. lmws our +mwr x s/c* LVdGi NE°' /Ixer.ss,sm ce6 uM A Em xml /1N1) xova lenuwsm nwexc -v swan Vm 6em IPm uWIPC zGG O'xA IM c e]o nn yIaIVEM1 qm[n wm 4IpM NEA 6r].aoo m a.aoo s LM D em 2]m lNf C eso 3110 va+N MtlWBE UNf xea 1134 NSAvoxMus �� .. l01 W.RYE([) ]E mill PIiT10F0: u.slevomnn . $$ GRAPHIC SCALE auoem xewE(.0 2 1/z srs uw2cnmN PIwIs sx1aE EwzAr xelKMfm oW¢JNc: z suras PPA oWENxIE n cmJce "'�' ^' K NM69 a scows s¢urMmueN PI.NNrs 1 5p�V5/yN15 si Pml£ Wev2 ArJAOEm 6x4JIG 2srPaM=VAuam SITE PLAN-AUC MA EW EMm • x MO1G RgPoZC ss Nm oIFR.VMLi fdWMM1'MM PI61L 1aRP 1.VNS x 2]PKS]/IN+- 2e 9`ra5 �l E.P p AVIIAPIE flmll sCwl OfF-E1REi PANaL 59Va PM 1M11S- b w rte mM a sovnl5w's mrla aP M mrx ArlveErs IEnw mrN vrmaec PmEmm rM wls n2� TM NEFiffACE AT CUfCF10CX1E m vv (m rm) nrm eu¢x m.zmx,A s2Ww smPM n Pm lealnm m use* Cl1TCF'IOTCHIO. M za6M wa rw+o.am v Mn ser mrKwmaYPPVnom N Pueow w]-v avers eu1mM]H.wr svKss GUE `w NOTE OWNER: APPLICANT: Iaow zwE PM.um:+ e[mIl PA1e sT Mz wrs NE All NEmol.as m+.+a Aw rm M a�,.xo�� Fw m .mew Dooz L rnoPgrt a 1E1sm•roc uxKl6Mzen Km]ATINJ a NOCRO. LTD- THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE, LLC KpnsxzmneA DOraNFNR umA Wounex err acnes 1w FAST AWN ST. 1721-0 NORTH OCEAN AVENUE NELSON & POPE ]MVM 1e11 Nh EinlE f➢Ilf T1x1 LAa OiMGYm11E ENC2MlEEflB.BVPVEYOflH GM g rumwws2mlm. RNFAHEAO. NY 11901 MEDFORD, NY 11763 mwrironawmm.leAsuexr oo-es e�+++� FIGURE 1-3 e An on-site drainage system consisting of the interconnected recharge ponds and leaching • pools is proposed. The system has been designed to accommodate in excess of a 6-inch rainfall event as required by Town standards, and will be subject to Town review and approval. On site sanitary systems are also proposed. Solid waste disposal will be provided by private carters for individual household pickup. However, a dumpster will be provided at the community center building, which will also be serviced via a private carter. 1.3.2 Grading and Drainage It is anticipated that the proposed development activities will necessitate that the entire site (45.99 acres) be cleared. Grading operations associated with site construction activities will primarily be necessary for excavations associated with the proposed ponds, as well as to provide adequate area for building footprints, building crawl spaces or basements and grades for proposed roadways. The ponds will have a maximum depth of 7 feet [elevation of 17 feet above sea level (as])], with a static water level at elevation 20 feet asl and a high water level at elevation 24 feet asl. Grading is also necessary throughout the site to direct stormwater runoff to drainage inlets and ensure proper functioning of the drainage system. A_berm. approximately 3.5' to 4' in height, will also be created alone the majority of the southwestern property line (±1,285 feet in length) and again along a portion of the northwest property line (±300 feet in length). Additionally, soil management activities (see Section 2.1.3) will need to occur prior to the start of construction in order to properly mitigate exposure to arsenic and mercury • found in on site soils. Soil management will involve isolation of soils as part of the initial stages of the grading plan to ensure that either non-impacted subsoils are exposed at the surface, or impacted surface soils are covered with at least one foot of clean soil. This will involve the scraping of the top 12 inches of site soils (±74,197 cubic yards) that will either be buried on site or exported off site for proper disposal. It is anticipated that approximately ±42,400 cubic yards (CY) of the scraped soil will be buried beneath the proposed pond, in trenches located throughout the property and used to create berms along the property boundaries and in centralized landscaped areas. The remaining ±31,797 CY of material will be exported off site to an appropriate receiving facility. This export of the ±31,797 CY of material associated with soil management activities will require fill to be generated to bring the site up to proper grade for site development. Additionally, the mass earthwork movement, which is the difference between the existing grades and final grades, shows that an additional 9,930 CY of soil will be needed to accomplish the final grades planned for site construction. Therefore, a total of±41,727 CY of fill material is anticipated to be necessary for the overall site grading activities (31,797 CY of soil removed due to soil management plus 9,930 CY of fill needed for the finished site grades proposed for development). The fill necessary for site development will be generated from the on-site excavation of basements or crawl spaces for the units, and the excavation of the ponds, sanitary systems and drainage leaching pools. The net quantity of cut resulting from these excavations will include: a range of approximately 21,950 CY (if all crawl spaces are constructed) to approximately 98,610 CY (if all units • are constructed with basements) from basement or crawl space excavations; approximately 2,830 CY from sanitary system excavations and approximately 4,650 CY generated from drainage leaching pool excavations. Therefore the total amount of fill 7 that will be available for reuse on the site will range from ±29,430 CY to ±106,090 of material depending on the ultimate number of basements or crawl spaces constructed. If • all the future units are constructed with crawl spaces, approximately±12,300 CY of clean fill would need to be imported into the site (±41,727CY of fill needed, minus ±29,430 CY of fill material generated on site for reuse) to complete the site development activities. If all basements are constructed for the proposed units, a net excess of±64,36 CY would be need to be exported off site (±41,727 CY of fill needed and ±106,090 CY of fill material generated on site).(Note this volume would be in addition to the±31,797 CY of material that would be exported off-site during soil management activities). The proposed proiect includes an on-site drainage system designed in conformance with the Town requirements to retain stormwater runoff generated by impervious surfaces on- site_The system is sized and designed to accommodate a 6-inch rainfall event utilizing a system of interconnecting leaching pools and the on site recharge ponds strategically located throughout the development. The Site Plan N Grading (Plate 1) provides details of the drainage system and drainage calculations, which demonstrates that the proposed system is designed to accommodate a total of 742,935 CF of stormwater storage, thereby exceeding the Town drainage requirements (654,277 CF) by 12%. Water circulation fountains and a waterfall are proposed to provide for proper water circulation and to prevent problems associated with stagnant water. The future Homeowners Association will be responsible for all maintenance of the drainage facilities, internal roadways, and common areas. Additionally, a State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit is required from the NYSDEC for the stormwater system and for erosion control measures during construction (see Section 1.5). • 1.3.3 Access, Road System and Parking As depicted on the site plans, two means of access are proposed to serve the residential development. A proposed access will intersect Schoolhouse Lane directly opposite Griffing Street. This access will be stop-controlled and configured for all movements. The second access is provided via Spur Road, which currently terminates at the western boundary of the site. The main gated site access stems from the central portion of this access road, which then continues north into the property creating a large looped road. The concept behind the internal road layout was to slow vehicular traffic by creating meandering roadways rather than linear roadways often prone to speeding. The layout is also intended to make the environment conducive to pedestrian traffic, by providing interest in the more curved roadway pattern and by providing sidewalks throughout the site. The proposed roadway was also designed to create an environment that provides a sense of privacy by breaking up the units as opposed to having homes all lining the roadways with full views up and down the neighborhood streets. The design is intended to provide a sense of serenity, which is in keeping with the objectives of an active adult development. Sidewalks are also proposed throughout the community, leading out to Spur Road and the property boundary in the vicinity of Griffing Street and Schoolhouse Lane to encourage and provide the ability for residents to walk to the Hamlet Center. Two emergency access roads are also proposed, one in the southern portion of the site • and one in the northern portion of the site. The southern emergency access is proposed 8 between Spur Road and an internal roadway, at which a crash gate is proposed. The • northern emergency access is proposed for connection to Bridle Lane. It is noted that the applicant has pursued obtaining an easement to allow for future connections to the property adjacent to the north as requested by the Town. The applicant obtained an appraisal of the land area necessary for the easement (see Appendix Land has contacted the property owner; however the owner of the property has not indicated any interest in entertaining the easement. A security guard booth and security gate is proposed at the site's main access and residents will be provided with transmitters for their vehicles to open the gates. All internal road right-of-ways are 25 feet in width; with 20 foot paved roadways planned for the one-way traffic roads. A 4-foot wide sidewalk is planned within the right-of-way abutting one side of the roadway. A truck turning radius map has been prepared to evaluate the proposed internal roadways with respect to safe access to adequacy of turning radius for emergency service vehicles. A copy of the map showing sufficient turning radii is provided in Plate 1. The roadway design will be reviewed by the Town Engineer and will provide ample access to vehicles such as garbage trucks, moving vans, and emergency vehicles. The Home Owner's Association will maintain all internal roadways. All roadways within the development will be privately owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association, including the roadway connecting Spur Road to Ciriffing Road. Pursuant to Town requirements, 328 parking spaces are required for the site. Required • parking for residential uses is 271 spaces based on 2 spaces per single family detached and attached dwelling units and 1.5 spaces per unit for affordable units. Additionally, one space per 300 SF of recreational facility uses (community building and pool) and five spaces per tennis court are required pursuant to Town parking requirements for a total of 57 spaces required for accessory recreational areas. One truck loading space is also required for a community center with a floor area of 5,000 to 25,000 SF. Table 1-3 details the parking requirements for the proposed project and the parking provided. The total parking provided by the proposed project includes 329 spaces and one truck loading space (see parking calculations provided on the Site Plan - Aliamnent, Plate 1). Parking will mainly be provided via the individual garage spaces provided for all but the one bedroom units. A total of 254 garage parking spaces are proposed, and an additional 18 off-street parking spaces are provided in small parking lots immediately adjacent to the one bedroom unit buildings. The community center, tennis courts, and pool require a total of 57 parking spaces, including three handicapped spaces, which are provided adjacent to the proposed Community center and pool. A loading zone (one berth) will also be provided on the southern side of the community center. In total, 329 parking spaces are proposed, which exceeds Town standards by one space. • 9 TABLE 1-3 PARKING REQUIREMENTS • TEN t x Single Family Detached Units 2/dwelling unit 222 spaces (222 spaces) Single Family Attached Units 2/dwelling unit 28 spaces (28 spaces) Affordable Units 1.5 spaces per unit 22 spaces (21 spaces) Community Center(14,400 GSF) 1 space per 300 SF 48 spaces 48 spaces) Pool 1 160 SF 1 space per 300 SF 4 spaces 4 spaces) Tennis Court 5 spaces per court 5 spaces (5 spaces) 1 berth for community Loading Zone center with floor area of 1 berth 5,000 to 25,000 SF 1 berth TOTAL (not including Loading 328 spaces 329 spaces Zone 1.3.4 Sanitary Disposal and Water Supply • Sanitary wastewater generated as a result of the proposed project will be treated utilizing on-site septic systems, designed as gang systems (multiple unit systems). The details of the proposed layout and sanitary flow calculations are provided on the Site Plan - Utility Plan (Plate 1). This form of disposal is acceptable, provided the projected wastewater design flow does not exceed standards established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). Article 6 of the SCSC addresses sewage facility requirements for realty subdivisions, in management order to limit the loading of nitrogen in various groundwateran gement zones as established by the SCDHS. As promulgated under Article 6, a Population Density Equivalent must be determined for the subject site in order to determine the type of sewage disposal system required for the type and size of project proposed. This equivalent (or total allowable flow) is then compared to the design sewage flow for the project. If the project's design sewage flow exceeds the Population Density Equivalent, a community sewage system or on-lot sewage treatment system is required. If the project's design sewage flow is less than the site's Population Density Equivalent, conventional septic systems may be used, provided individual systems comply with the current design standards and no community sewerage system is available or accessible. The project site is located within Groundwater Management Zone IV as defined by the • SCDHS. Based on the requirements of Article 6, no more than 600 gallons of sanitary wastewater may be discharged per acre on a daily basis within this zone, provided public 10 water supply is available. The project will utilize public water supply provided by the • Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA). The acreage used for determining this Population Density Equivalent must not include wetlands, surface waters, or land in flood zones. The subject site is 45.99 acres in size (and does not require exclusion of underwater lands, wetlands or areas within flood zones), thus, the Population Density Equivalent (total allowable flow) on the subject site is calculated as: 45.99 acres x 600 gpd/acre = 27,702 gallons per day(gpd) Based on SCDHS sanitary design flow factors (see Table 1-3), the anticipated sanitary wastewater generated by the site is as follows: The SCDHS sanitary design flow factors for senior residential units applied by the SCDHS is 150 gpd. Therefore, it is estimated that the 139 proposed residences will generate approximately 20,850 gpd of sewage flow. TABLE 1-4 TOTAL WASTEWATER GENERATION DeenpfionfUnts/STj SCDHDesilin.FlowFaetor Total _�Wasteiyater � � _� 139 senior residences 150 gpd/unit 20,850 gpd 1,000 SF gym (community 0.30 gpd per SF 300 gpd center) • 1,500 SF office (community 0.06 gpd per SF 90 gpd center) Pools(75 bathers) 5 gpd/bather 375 gpd Total 21,615 gpd It should be noted that the design effluent volume is intended by the SCDHS to be `conservative" in nature (i.e., higher than actually expected), to ensure that the wastewater system is not overtaxed and design flow can accommodate peak usage. This site generated wastewater total is 5,979 gpd less than allowed by the SCDHS under its current regulations. Therefore, conventional on site sanitary systems may be used for this development in accordance with Article 6 of the SCSC and design flow factors established by SCDHS. Correspondence from the Town Attorney (see Appendix I) further confirmed that construction of the STP is not required pursuant to Health Department requirements because the units will be restricted by Covenants and Restrictions to a senior community(age 55 and older). No previous connections to SCWA water mains exist on site. The SCWA has been contacted to determine whether the District will be able to supply water to the project (Appendix H); the SCWA has confirmed that it can and will provide such services upon site plan approval by the Town. Irrigation of the fertilized landscape portions of the site (±14.56 acres) will require a conservative annualized daily average of ±17,800 gpd • (based on an irrigation rate of 5.5 inches per year applied during summer months N mid May through mid September). The applicant has designed the ponds to use recharge water for irrigation purposes in accordance with smart growth concepts. However, for 11 conservative calculation purposes we have assumed that water to be used for irrigation will be public water. Assuming that all wastewater generated will originate as public • water supply, daily water consumption and irrigation is estimated to total 139,415 gpd. Additionally, water levels within the proposed recharge pond will be maintained during periods of drought through the use of an on well. Water added to the pond through the use of the well will be introduced through the proposed waterfall, which is located in the southern portion of the site. At this time, it is expected that the pumpage capacity for the proposed well will be 40 gallons per minute, therefore not requiring a permit from the NYSDEC. It is noted that a permit from the NYSDEC is required for the installation of a well to withdraw water for any purpose when the total capacity of such well (or wells) on any property is in excess of 45 gallons per minute. Pursuant to the request of the SCDHS (see SCWA letter of October 15, 2007, Appendix H), the applicant will also extend public water to 52 homes currently on private wells down gradient (south/southeast) of the proposed project site. The routing and extent of the water main extensions to be completed by the applicant is provided by Figure 1-4. 1.3.5 Site Landscaping and Lighting The site is fallow farm field established in successional vegetation; however, no mature trees exist on the property, which has been fallow for approximately 25 years. As the proposed site plan will utilize nearly the entire site, existing successional vegetation will be removed and replaced with the planned development as depicted in the Site Alignment • Plan. The proposed site design will provide approximately±24 acres of landscaping (or ±52 percent of the site) between and along rows of buildings and within the site development, as well as provide a fully vegetated berm of evergreen plantings and a minimum of 3' in height, along the majority of the southwestern property line (±1285 feet in length) and a portion of the northwest property line (±300 feet in length). Landscape Plans are provided in Plate 2, which detail species selection and location of proposed throughout the community, including typical unit landscaping plans and a landscaping plan for the community center. The landscaping plans utilize a variety of commercially available landscape species complementary to those in the adjacent natural lands, and include the installation of street trees (varieties of sugar maple, sweet gum and aristocrat pear) spaced forty feet on center throughout the community. The landscape design calls for a total of ±14.56 acres (31.6% of the site) as landscaped with fertilizer/irrigation dependent turf and foundation plantings. Fertilizer usage is estimated at 2.30 pounds of nitrogen-bearing fertilizer per 1,000 SF of area (lbs/1,000 SF), and irrigation is assumed to be 5.5 inches from mid-May to mid-September once plantings are established. The remainder of the open space areas, including the perimeter of the ponds will be established in non-fertilizer dependent vegetation (wood mulched, shrub landscape and/or native planting beds, meadow areas, perimeter tree/shrub planting buffers, and native grasses and plantings surrounding ponds). The parking areas, internal roadways and building exteriors will be illuminated as illustrated on the Lighting Plans, included in Plate 1. Lighting will be provided • consistent with the locations, pole heights and specifications of the type and power of fixture typically required by the Town. The Signage and Lighting Plans, included in 12 GPI Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. "' ,6i /^� Q �/-\-\� \\\�_- "; �/• '\\�\ �ei`' '^.. / BRE �\ 3 ./ \�\` ERITAGE AT Cl7TCHOGUE,LLC �\ °�c �� �"``4.� y� 1721-0NORTH OCEMI AVENUE MEDFORD,NEWYORK 11763 'N\ /�` /// �\ / C \ \ / 5 1'I - ! � �`J' v�.\ 1 y ;<� \•-- HERITAGE AT CUPCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE.NEW YORK . i«''r°� / L � \ C\ '� I\,�—�—j Leto/" � \�\\ �• j' vl w� `mra��.v` ''� �� �\��. L ,6 � 1 .LLfS NOTE: PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXTENSION AS PER SCWA LETTER -PROPOSED WATER MAIN SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER DATED OCTOBER 15, 2007, REGARDING HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE —EXISTING WATER MAIN NOT ACTIVATED AUTHORITY-WATER (SCWA REF/ 115-470707586) WATER MAIN EXTENSION. MAIN MAP GRAPHIC SCALE WATER MAIN LOCATIONS AND SIZES WHERE OBTAINED FROM PUBLISHED 12-12-07 KAH SCWA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MAPS LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 24, 2007 "o'oo e 5M. taw zcoa �,aw —1 _-_-_— 1'=4W BG • [ans n w°en.rn[�w do m>@,a lu EFIGURE IN FEET 1 t4 I Plate 1, provide details of all the proposed lighting fixtures, power requirements and a • photometric analysis for both the street lighting and wall mounted lighting fixtures on the individual units_ Lighting details for the proposed project will conform to Town standards, which only allows for outdoor lighting that is shielded so it is not visible to adjacent properties or from roadways. Light glare must be contained within the property boundaries, and must be reduced in intensity between the hours of 11:30 P.M. and 4:00 A.M. The photometric analysis provided on the Signage and Lighting Plans, included in Plate 1, provides the lighting contours in foot candles for each of the proposed lighting poles and fixtures and demonstrates that light glare will be contained within the property boundaries. All outdoor lighting fixtures do not exceed 14' in height, as required by Town Code. In addition to the requirements outlined in the Town Code, the proposed lighting plan follows the Guidelines for Good Exterior Lighting Plans prepared by The Dark Sky Society. Recreational lighting will be located around the outdoor pool and the tennis courts. Town code allows for recreational lighting to exceed the 14-foot maximum height, but requires the following two criteria: • All intensive recreational lighting shall be so located on the property with reference to surrounding properties that it shall be reasonably screened from view and compatible with the existing or potential use of neighboring properties. • No outdoor recreational facility, public or private, shall be illuminated after 11:00 p.m. except to conclude a recreational or sporting event or any other similar activity conducted at or in the facility which was in progress under such illumination prior to 11:00 p.m. • The proposed lighting for the tennis courts will be turned off at 9:00 P.M. so as to not impact the surrounding properties and to comply with Town code. 1.3.6 Open Space Open space will be provided for residents in the form of landscaped common areas and the network of ponds located throughout the central portion of the site. Additional amenities will include an indoor and outdoor pool, the community center and tennis courts. Open space will be provided only for the residents of the community and their guests as the community will be gated with private access. Additional areas of open space exist via a nearby park, located immediately to the east of the subject parcel, which provides additional open space and recreational opportunities for the residents. 1.4 Construction and Operation 1.4.1 Construction The applicant is anticipating an approximately 12-18 month approval process, followed by posting of bonds, letting of construction contracts and a construction period of 18-24 months. As a result, the general time frame for staging and completion of the proposed • project is in the range of 2 to 3 years. The project will be developed in three phases, as required by the Town. 13 The construction phase is anticipated to progress in a manner typical for a project of the size and type proposed; no unique or unusual construction difficulties are anticipated. • Impacts during the construction phase are commonly expected and are identified and discussed herein. As detailed below, these impacts are temporary in nature, and will be variable throughout the construction period. Construction activities will not occur outside weekday daytime hours (7 a.m. to 5 p.m.), and will conform to applicable Town regulations regarding construction noise generation and hours. The first phase of construction will include clearing, grubbing, grading, erosion control and soil management work (see Section 2.1.3). This will include building and planting of the proposed berms, which will provide screening of construction activities from the adjacent residential uses. The entire site will be cleared which will be subject to erosion during the construction phase, and will be the areas from which dust could arise, due to truck and equipment movement and winds. Following completion of clearing activities, survey of road alignment and vertical control will be completed to establish road installation and proper grades. The grading concept will involve use of material excavated elsewhere within the site to raise the grade in limited fill areas. The remainder of the property is relatively flat and foundation excavated material will be used to contour the land for proper drainage around buildings. The boundaries of the construction area will be lined with silt fence and staked haybales, and drainage inlets will be protected by soil traps. It is anticipated that all construction equipment, materials and vehicles will be staged, parked and loaded/unloaded within the site. The intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street will be used for all • construction access associated with the proposed project. Due to the proposed net export of material, it is proposed to reuse as much of this material on-site as practicable, in order to minimize the volume of material to be removed from the site (and the number of truck trips necessary to remove it). Generally, the site will be constructed starting on the southeastern portion of the property and progress west. The model homes, community building and approximately 30 homes will be started and completed during this first phase of construction, including the utilities and landscaping for these areas. The model homes will be built on the first loop of the road directly behind the community building. A sales office (trailer) for the project will also be set up at this time and will be located in the community building parking area and then relocating to the model homes once completed. The construction field office will also be located in this same area and relocated into the site as construction progresses to the west. Similarly, employee parking, staging and equipment storage areas will also be moved periodically as construction progresses into the site. The building materials for each home will be stored at the home site as needed and the pre-cast catch basins and piping will be staged along the roadway and in the area of the leaching fields and pond areas where most of this material will be used. The complete infrastructure will be developed in this phase including all underground utilities and internal roadways completed less the paving portion, which will be installed as sections are completed. The balance of the homes in this phase will commence with • excavation for foundations, concrete, framing, interior work and finishes until complete including all utility connections, final street paving and final landscaping. 14 • Phase 2 will involve the construction of the units in the central portion of the site, and Phase 3 will complete the remaining units in the western portion of the site using the same sequence for construction activities as described above. Any outstanding/remaining items will be completed in Phase 3 along with any landscaping issues that may arise. All street stormwater basins and silt separators will be checked again and cleaned out as necessary prior to the completion of construction activities. As construction equipment loading/unloading, materials storage, and construction staging areas and construction worker parking will be located within the site, no significant or long-term construction impacts to the surrounding residences are anticipated. Installation of a construction access/exit at Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street will minimize potential adverse impacts on the residences along Highland Road and Bridle Lane. Erosion control measures will be implemented during construction of the proposed project in order to minimize impacts. In accordance with the NYSDEC Phase II SPDES Program, coverage under the General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities (NYSDEC Permit No. GP-0-08-001, General Permit) will be obtained prior to the initiation of construction activities. Prior to filing for coverage under the General Permit, the NYSDEC requires that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be prepared for the parcel, including a detailed erosion and sediment control plan, to manage stormwater generated on-site during construction activities, and for post-construction stormwater management. An SWPPP will be prepared to ensure • compliance with water quality and quantity requirements pursuant to Technical Guidance and GP-0-08-001 requirements. In addition, an Erosion Control Plan incorporating the NYSDEC Technical Guidance manual, and use of measures such as silt fencing, storm drain inlet protection, hay bales, and good housekeeping procedures will be utilized. The drainage system and revegetation plan will father provide permanent stormwater controls once construction is completed. Development of the property is not anticipated to significantly increase erosion/sedimentation or stormwater impacts, as a result of proper site grading procedures, erosion controls, and drainage system design. The Notice of Intent (NOI) requesting coverage under the General Permit will be filed in accordance with NYSDEC requirements, prior to the initiation of construction activities at the subject property. 1.4.2 Operation A Home Owners Association (HOA) will be established for the Heritage at Cutchogue and this entity will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the commonly owned grounds, roadway and drainage systems, community facility buildings, pool, and other amenities. Approximately two full time employees will be required to staff the gate house. The HOA will out source maintenance, landscaping, garbage hauling and maintenance service (which will involve weekly attention by approximately 10-15 workers from spring through fall and approximately 5 workers during winter months for snow and garbage removal). The Heritage at Cutchogue will be operated under an HOA • agreement generated and filed in accordance with the laws of New York State. Annual fees charged to the residents as required under the HOA agreement will fund the operation. Facilities will be open year round (with the exception of the outdoor pool 15 which is expected to be open from Memorial Day to Labor Day) to residents of the development and their guests. The community building will be available for residents • meetings and small gatherings. There will be limited need for large trucks to enter the site. Garbage collection vehicles and box delivery trucks (Fed Ex or similar) will be expected on a weekly basis similar to surrounding residential areas. A truck loading area is provided at the community building in accordance with Town Code. 1.5 Permits and Approvals Required Several permits must be obtained for the project before the start of construction. A State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for Construction Permit and a Mining Permit will be required from the New York State Department of Conservation. Site approval and Building Permits are required for the Town of Southold. Suffolk County Department of Health Services issue permits for sanitary discharge. Utility Hookup approvals are necessary from the various agencies. TABLE 1-5 PERMITS AND APPROVALS Permit Needed and Issuing A enc State Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit NYSDEC • For Construction Site Mining Permit NYSDEC Division of Mined lands Sanitary Discharge Permits Suffolk County Department of Health Services Site Plan Approval Town of Southold Planning Board Building Permits Town of Southold Building Department Utility Hookups Various Agencies Gas and Electric NLong Island Power Authority Water- Suffolk County Water Authority Cable-Cablevision Phone-Verizon • 16 2.0 NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES • 2.1 Soils 2.1.1 Existing Conditions According to the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Suffolk County and also the Web Soil Survey of the National Cooperative Soil Survey this area is comprised of several different soil types. The most prevalent is the Haven loam with a slope of 0 to 2 percent; this makes up approximately 66% of the soils and the Riverhead Sandy loam at 3 to 8 percent, approximately 28%. Also on the site are Haven loams of 2 to 6 Percent slope and Haven loam, thick surface layer, and Plymouth loams from 3 to 8 percent and 8 to 15 percent. The Haven series are comprised of deep well draining soils that formed over stratified sand and coarse gravel. In natural area of haven soils the top layer is comprised of leaf litter and decomposed material. In agricultural areas, as this site is, this top layer has been plowed in with the subsurface and a plow layer of approximately 10 inches thick is present. The subsoil is a dark brown friable loam reaching to about 19 inches below surface. Beyond this is considered the lower part of the soil profile. This reaches to approximately 28 inches below surface and is comprised of a yellowish brown friable gravelly loam. The substratum, which can reach a depth of 55 inches below surface, is • yellowish brown to brownish yellow loose sand and gravel. Haven Loam 0-2 percent slopes (HaA) The Haven loam 0-2 % slope soil makes up approximately 65 % of the site. They are characterized by high to moderate moisture capacity with low natural fertility. Internal drainage is good with moderate permeability in the substratum. Erosion hazard is slight. Haven Loam 2-6 percent slopes (HaB) The characteristics of this soil is the same as the 0-2 percent slope above except this soil has a slight to moderate erosion hazard. This type of soil though only comprised approximately I% of the site. Plymouth Loamy Sand, 3-8 percent slopes A very small portion of the project site, the Plymouth loamy sand comprises approximately 1.5 percent of the site. This soil type is characterized by deep well drained course soils. These soils have a low to very low available moisture capacity and low natural fertility. Internal drainage is good and permeability is rapid except in the substratum where it is considered moderate. Hazard of erosion is slight within this formation. Riverhead Sandy Loam 3-8 percent Riverhead Sandy loam comprises approximately 30 % of the remaining soils in this area. • These soils consist of deep well drained, moderately coarse soils that is found over thick layers of sand and gravel. It is found in rolling to steep areas on moraines and in level gently sloping areas on outwash plains. Representative soils are a dark brown sandy loam 17 on the surface the subsoil is a strong brown to a yellowish brown at the lower portions of the subsoil. The substratum is a pale brown and brown loose sand and gravel. Erosion • hazard is slight to moderate, with the main concerns being that of erosion and runoff control. As shown on the Soils Map (Figure 2-1), nearly 70% of the site is comprised of the Haven series soils. These soils, as stated by the US Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Suffolk County, presents only slight limitations to their use as homesites, streets, parking lots sewage disposal fields and lawns. A "slight limitation" according to the survey means that -the soil has few or no limitations" and that -any limitations that are present can be overcome at little cost,,. In short, these areas represent good locations, from a soils standpoint, for home sites and related appurtenances. The only exceptions to this generalization are areas within formations HaB containing slopes approaching six percent, where additional care must be taken both during and after construction to prevent erosion. However, this soil group represents only about 1 percent of the total site and the actual portion of this group having a slope over 6% is even less. The remainder of the site is nearly all made up of the Riverhead Sandy Loam with a slope of 3% to 8%. This group, much like the Haven soils, has few limitations to its usage as a bomesites or sewage disposal field. As with the Haven soils though, the only exceptions to this are the areas that have a slope greater than 6%. The remainder of the site is comprised of Plymouth Loamy Sand. This type of soil contains deep, excessively drained soils with rapid permeability and good internal drainage. Due to the excessive drainage of this soil type there is a slight chance of • groundwater pollution. However, on this site, this soil makes up approximately 2% and placement of the sanitary fields away from these soils will reduce any potential problems. A soils map is presented on figure 2-1. Table 2-1 summarizes the potential soil limitations. TABLE 2-1 SITE SOILS NINMEM Haven Loam 0-2 Slight erosion potential Haven Loam 2-6 Moderate to slight erosion potential Plymouth Loamy Sand 3-8 Slight erosion potential Pl outh Loamy Sand 8-15 Moderate to severe erosion potential I Riverhead Sandy Loam 3-8 Moderate to slight erosion potential As this site was originally an agricultural site the development of the property as per the proposed plans will create the loss of approximately 45 acres of lost agricultural soils. There is no plan for any mitigation for this loss of soils. Topoaranhy Unlike other areas of the town of Southold, which have elevations ranging upward of 160 feet and steep slopes exceeding 50% in some areas, the proposed project site has lower • elevations and is much flatter. 18 Uw uz w c . yOZO O w O 0 tnh �Q' n n co �ul 0 0 J J to a o y LD x s w a a 1, As illustrated in the Existing Resources and Site Analysis Plan included in Plate 1 (Sheet • 25 of 27), this site can be generally characterized as rolling with slopes ranging from 0.5 to 13 percent. The site contains two knolls with elevations above 38 and 36 respectively, the first being at the southerly end of the site and the second found approximately 1000 feet to the north of the first, both are on the west side of the property. The low point of the property, at elevation 20, is located near the eastern property line. The runoff from the southern portion of the property will be expected to flow to this point, while the northern portion of the site drains to the north and east. Pesticides A soil survey was conducted to determine if any contamination of the soils by pesticide related compounds was present on the site (Appendix D). Using guidance from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) and the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) a sampling and analysis protocol was designed to determine the concentrations ofP esticides and metals in the soil. A total of 18 samples were collected from 9 locations. Samples were taken at 0-3 inches and 3-6 inches. These samples were analyzed for compounds relating to former pesticide use on the site due to its use for agriculture. Results of the tests on these samples showed that 5 samples at the 0-3 inch depth contained elevated levels of pesticide compounds. These samples though, were not found • to exceed their respective United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) or New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Technical Administrative Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) 4046 recommended soil cleanup objectives. These 5 samples were then tested for the presence of heavy metals. All samples were found to contain elevated levels of several metals. Only arsenic though, was found to exceed its corresponding SCDHS guidance values of 4 mg/kg. In addition, mercury was found to exceed the NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective of 0.1 mg/kg in three of the 9 samples. These samples though did not exceed the USEPA SSL of 610 mg/kg. Of the four samples analyzed only for arsenic all were found to contain elevated levels, which exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. Based on the results of the 0-3 inch interval samples the 3-6 inch samples for each location were also analyzed. Arsenic exceeded SCDHS guidance values in all samples and mercury was found to be above the NYSDEC TAGM 4046 soil cleanup objective in 3 of these samples though it was found to be below the USEPA SSL. 2.1.2 Anticipated Impacts Impacts to the soils and topography of the site and the subsurface geology will be minor. Grading operations associated with site construction activities will primarily be necessary for excavations associated with the proposed ponds as well as to provide adequate area for building footprints building crawl spaces or basements and grades for proposed roadways Grading is also necessary throughout the site to direct stormwater runoff to • drainage inlets and ensure proper functioning of the drainage system. A berm, approximately 3.5' to 4' in height will also be created along the majority of the southwestern property line W285 feet in length) and again along a portion of the 19 northwest property line (±300 feet in length. The site ading_plan has been developed to minimize the need for excessive cuts or creation of steep slope areas and to conform • closely to the existing terrain. Due to the nature of the soils on the site (medium to coarse sand) it is expected that all materials excavated for the basements will be utilized for the creation of the road sub-base. Construction of the roads, driveways, buildings and pond will require the removal of topsoil. This topsoil will be stockpiled on site and utilized for the creation of the landscaped areas and to stabilize the slopes that have been carved to flatten. The development of the site will result in the loss of±45 acres of agricultural soils with no mitigation proposed. However, the site will be developed in accordance with the existing site zoning, which specifies hamlet density residential development. Use of pesticides on agricultural land is common, particularly on the east end. Residential development can be accommodated provided certain safeguards are observed. SCDHS provides guidance to municipalities in the manuscript entitled, Procedures For Municipalities To Evaluate The Need For Soil Sampling And Soil Management At Subdivisions Or Other Construction Projects With Potentially Contaminated Soils (Draft February 2006). This document outlines sampling procedures and soil management options to ensure that health risks related to re-use of agricultural properties are minimized. Sampling of soils outlined in Section 2.1.1 followed these protocols. Mitigation through soil management is proposed consistent with SCDHS guidance such that no significant adverse impacts are anticipated as related to agricultural soils. . A Soil Management Plan has been prepared (included as Appendix E) and is described in Section 2.1.3. Soil management activities (described in detail in Section 2.1.3 below) will be necessary • in order to properly mitigate exposure to arsenic and mercury found in on site soils. Soil management will involve isolation of soils as part of the initial stages of the grading plan to ensure that either non-impacted subsoils are exposed at the surface, or impacted surface soils are covered with at least one foot of clean soil. This will involve the scraping of the top 12 inches of site soils (±74,197 cubic yards) that will either be buried on site or exported off site for proper disposal. It is anticipated that approximately ±42,400 cubic yards (CY) of the scraped soil will be buried beneath the proposed pond, in trenches located throughout the property and used to create berms along the property boundaries and in centralized landscaped areas. The remaining ±31,797 CY of material will be exported off site to an appropriate receiving facility. This export of the ±31,797 CY of material associated with soil management activities will require fill to be generated to bring the site up to proper grade for site development and ensure impacted surface soils are covered with a minimum of one foot of clean soil. Additionally, the mass earthwork movement, which is the difference between the existing grades and final gxades, shows that an additional 9,930 CY of soil will be needed to accomplish the final grades planned for site construction. Therefore, a total of±41,727 CY of fill material is anticipated to be necessary for the overall site grading activities (31,797 CY of soil removed due to soil management plus 9,930 CY of fill needed for the finished siterg ades proposed for development). The fill necessary for site development will be generated from the on-site excavation of basements or crawl spaces for the units, • and excavation of the ponds, sanitary systems and drainage leaching pools. The net quantity of cut material resulting from these excavations will include: a range of±21,950 20 CY (if all crawl spaces are constructed) to ±98,610 CY (if all units are constructed with • basements) venerated from basement or crawl space excavations: approximately 2.830 CY from sanitary system excavations and approximately 4,650 CY generated from drainage leaching pool excavations. Therefore the total amount of fill generated from on site excavations that will be available for reuse on the site will range from ±29,430 CY to ±106,090 of material depending on the ultimate number of basements or crawl spaces constructed If all the future units are constructed with crawl spaces, approximately 12,300 CY of clean fill would need to be imported into the site (±41,727 CY of fill needed less ±29,430 CY of fill material generated from on-site excavations for reuse onsite) to complete the site development activities. If all basements are constructed for the proposed units a net excess of material would be generated (±64,290 CY), which would need to be exported off site for sale/reuse or proper disposal (±106,090 CY of fill material generated from on site excavations but only ±41,797 CY of fill needed for site development) (Note this volume would be in addition to the ±31,797 CY of material that would be exported off-site during soil management activities). Gradin activity ctivity will be conducted internally within the site and proper erosion and sediment control techniques will be utilized during construction of the proposed project in order to minimize impacts on adjacent properties. 2.1.3 Proposed Mitigation As stated above the impacts from the construction of this site on the soils and geology of the site are not anticipated to be significant. The site gradingplan has been developed to • minimize the need for excessive cuts or creation of steep slope areas and to conform closely to the existing terrain. Most of the soils that will be excavated from the building sites, due to its makeup, will be able to be utilized for the construction of the roads and parking areas. Any topsoil that is removed for the construction will be stockpiled on site and will be utilized for the stabilization of any disturbed areas. The topsoil will also be used for the creation of the lawns and gardens. An erosion control plan has also been prepared (included in Plate 1 at the end of the document), which demonstrate the protection methods that will be utilized during construction to control transport of sediment and stormwater runoff and ensure slope stabilization upon the completion of construction activities. According to the Nelson & Pope Pesticide Report for the proposed site (Appendix E) it is recommended that a soil management plan be prepared to mitigate exposure to arsenic and mercury. SCDHS outlines soil management guidance to ensure that dermal contact, ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soils does not occur. Soil management options include: on-site stockpiling, on-site burial and/or covering of soils with sufficient material to prevent exposure. Soil management will involve isolation of soils as part of the grading plan to ensure that either non-impacted subsoils are exposed at the surface, or impacted surface soils are covered with at least one foot of clean soil. A Soil Management Plan (SMP) has been prepared for the site in accordance with SCDHS guidelines (included as Appendix E). The SMP calls for the top 12 inches of soils to be scraped from the site resulting in ±74,197 CY of soil that will either be buried on site or • exported off site for proper disposal. Approximately±42,400 CY of the scraped soil will be buried beneath the proposed pond, in trenches located throughout the property and used to create berms along the property boundaries and in centralized landscaped areas. 21 Figure 2 in the SMP depicts the soil burial locations proposed on the site. The remaining . ±31,797 CY of material will be exported off site to an appropriate receiving facility. The clean soils from excavated areas will be used as cover (minimum of one foot) throughout the site. Section 4 of the SMP provides specific details of the phasing of excavations and stockpile areas. This plan will be reviewed by the Town in detail during the site plan review of the project to ensure the proposed plan adequately meets the objectives of soil management to mitigate potential concerns with regard to detected soil chemical concentrations present on the land. 2.2 Water Resources 2.2.1 Existing Conditions Groundwater In terms of groundwater for drinking purposes the Town of Southold has a unique situation that is in contrast with the more western areas of the County, where the Magothy and Lloyd aquifers contain large quantities of fresh water, the deeper waters below the Town of Southold contain only saltwater. Due to this, the Upper Glacial Aquifer is the only source of fresh drinkable water for the area of the proposed project. The "shape" of the groundwater surface follows that of the land surface, but at a reduced scale. As a result, the glacial aquifer can be thought of as topographically controlled, and consists of several mounds of water located under the higher areas of the town. Due to • the nature of the water supply, the North Fork Water Supply Plan (ERM N Northeast/Camp Dresser and Mckee, 1983) was created. This plan established 5 water supply zones for the groundwater management purposes. The proposed project is located in Zone 3, which extends from Mattituck Inlet to Arshamomoque Pond. The water supply plan also identified Water Budget Areas. These are areas of sufficient depth and thickness, of the groundwater to allow the development of public water supply wells. The thickness of the groundwater aquifer, which is a function of the elevation of the water table above sea level, is determined using the Ghyben-Herzberg relationship. This relationship accounts for the density difference between fresh and salt water. This formula predicts the depth of fresh groundwater below sea level equal to 40 times the water table elevation above sea level. The water budget area for the project area has been mapped by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, and includes most of the area of zone 3 and the entire project site. Also mapped by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services are eight groundwater management zones. This project is located in zone IV, which covers most of the North Fork and some of the South Fork. The hydrologic characteristics and management implications of the different water zones is discussed in the Nassau-Suffolk Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan, or more commonly known as the 208 Study (Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Board, May 1988). According to this study, Zone IV is very unique and requires careful management. This area has been impacted by the use of the water for farming and saltwater intrusion of the aquifers is the result. • However this plan states that there is sufficient water for development with proper development and management of the supply wells and sanitary systems. 22 • The Water Resources Division of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has installed and monitors a well near the projected site. This well, found on Alvah's Lane (well # 53327) provides groundwater data for the area dating from 1975 to the present. This data is useful in showing conditions of the water supply of the projected site. The well is located at elevation 25, which is much lower than the elevation of the site. The average elevation above sea level of the groundwater is 4.08 feet with seasonal variations of groundwater depths showing in the fall (3.5 feet above sea level) and the spring (5.5 feet above seal level). The maximum reading at this site was 6.78 feet in 1979 and a minimum recorded level was seen in September of 1981 with an elevation above sea level of 2.20 feet. Groundwater at the site has been shown to be higher than that of Alvah's Lane, which is due to the difference in elevation of the site and the monitoring well. An on-site test well determined the depth to groundwater on the site is 25 feet. Groundwater at this site will be used for the purpose of maintaining the ponds level during drought times. Irrigation water for the landscaped areas, and drinking water for the residences will be supplied by the Suffolk County Water Authority. Groundwater flow direction is determined for the site usingthe groundwater contour ma gr P published by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. A portion of the county groundwater map is shown here in Figure 2-2. Based on this map, groundwater under the adjacent property moves from northwest to southeast. • Private wells adjacent to the property are present on the residential property to the west. These are shown on Figure 2-3. All of these wells are hydrologically upgradient from the subject property. Groundwater quality under the site was examined through installation of a test well in 2002. A standard potability test determined that levels of all contaminants, except iron, were below drinking water standards. With regard to iron, the level was 0.31 mg/l, compared to the standard of 0.30 mg/l. This is an insignificant exceedance, and is typical of groundwater on Long Island. The groundwater analysis results are presented in Appendix F. 2.2.2 Anticipated Impacts The development of the site will have two distinct impacts; first is the disposal of the sanitary waste of the residences and its subsequent leaching into groundwater and the second is the introduction of the stormwater drainage into groundwater through the use of recharge ponds. It is important to note that the direction of groundwater flow under the property is towards the southeast, away from the residence to the west. The water quality impacts due to the disposal of sanitary waste are a major concern and must be evaluated. The major concern associated with the wastewater disposal is the nitrogen loading of the groundwater. Contamination from nitrates is a serious problem in • the Town of Southold due to the extensive use of fertilizers for farming. For the purpose of determining the nitrogen impacts of the project, an extensive analysis, using the BURBS model, a computer simulation program developed by the Northeast Regional 23 Agricultural Engineering Service at Cornell University. This program computes the potential impact of a proposed development on the groundwater within a community due • to nitrogen. Cornell University developed this model for use on Long Island. The parameters used include population density, surface land type, fertilizer use, handling of wastewater and precipitation. These parameters are then used to compute the total concentration of nitrogen leached into groundwater. Nitrogen is an important factor due to health impacts at high concentrations in drinking water, and due to the potential for eutrophication of surface waters. These concems have resulted in the establishment of a 10-mg/1 nitrate standard for groundwater suitable as a source of potable water supply. The nitrate concentration in recharge water is a function of various inputs, including sewage, and fertilizer, both agricultural and residential types, all of which is diluted by the precipitation, domestic water use and lawn irrigation. The techniques developed for BURBS have been used to forecast groundwater impacts due to the development of properties in the Long Island Pine Barren Region. This use is applicable to this project because it predicts impacts in the Carver and Plymouth Sandy soils, which are similar to the Haven soils of the project site. It should be noted that the BURBS program tends to overestimate predictions of groundwater nitrate concentrations. For the purpose of this analysis many different factors are considered in the assumption of Nitrogen concentrations. These factors are as follow: 1. The fraction of land in turf, which refers to the area of the proposed site that will be maintained as lawn. • 2. The fraction of land that is impervious. This is the sum of the roof area, driveways, and roads divided by the total area of the site. 3. The average persons per dwelling 4. Housing density or the number of houses per acre. 5. Precipitation rate or the annual average precipitation rate in inches. 6. Water recharged from turf or the amount of water per unit area of turf which drains to groundwater 7. Water recharged from natural land, which is the amount of water per unit area of natural vegetation that drains to groundwater. 8. Evaporation from impervious surface or the fraction of precipitation that falls on impervious surfaces. 9. Runoff from impervious recharged which is the fraction of the runoff that is recharged through recharge basins, ponds, etc. minus any water that storm sewers remove to surface waters. 10. Water use per person 11. The average nitrogen concentration in precipitation. This is obtained from the closest weather station to the proposed site that performs this test. 12. The nitrogen concentration in water used in the homes 13. The turf fertilization rate or the average nitrogen application rate that will be applied to the lawns of the project site. 14. The fraction of nitrogen leached from turf which is the fraction of • nitrogen applied from fertilizers, precipitation etc that actually recharges to groundwater 24 • Sfi o•$� 3a ' , y / c ° o -' • ' Hog NI GPI ° .,O _- Bay Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. ound • bio O: x x ° G � OCl 24 325�' 1031)o�: .gw..,,.,,.ea 9�,•. w ,x � •.• �•e. Oo la • yn oN AREA OF PROPOSED °•° ° ,.Ne PROJECT- HER ITA E 6 0' ,t •88t. 9 T CUTCHOGUE ° • U Is >\ tcho ue Eaat •42, ae ••° o° Elam Sch ° es] _ 4 _ :° d �• %Secred cart lj•' J' 1P • Cem o P L !O sty * ° so ! •T = �� r n Beach District Park p L D C o s a ; ERITAGEATCLUCHOGUE LLC r'�p° - 1727-0 NORTH OCEAN AVENUE a �p J/ �� C/A1• •, S �' MEDFORD,NEW YORK 11763 N, ° / T UtChO P0 . t % water ( I Oty ^ M 32 ti • 'c �� ^ !G F�0 ! , 2 l7 •,yc • G v o '�•• •.r•' :•o : utcr•••e ? tyJ f�MB'a O o ANEW �. ,� sf •� • •• p C u t c h o g u e e+ HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE � e / � n CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK R< .z. `r000 r :4 o °��• o z Harbor s s orth Forty MarshHorseswee ao • CountryC ti , a Pt 'wo otf^Ptit 3 tR �.\ o` N s +__ f s b r PakaaP r/ - .•- — - y ,+ V — Cutchogae Harbor zz e North Fork F e d fa s I rs ae, • r P 32•j y Count Club m •tPP° auituck ° is y 0 v — f 10 Jr Sr i a aU IaL High SCE$ 2 / e i ew 0 -, + Old Cove _ _ S ff acht Club zf ro rratooka Sch 0 w..,.e, ro...•. Lake aUfF°LK yey ., dUF OL1t ?O °.. • x f �g\^'• t _a - rZ C b .5, -� • — VE 6 19 GROUNDWATER h, a � 'stn .�, �a•ox s Y CONTOUR MAPVA SM 13 a ai Nr •ro S ;� k Mattituck o s OS12-08 KAH MStt CICe Avbase • w it 6 S S= 0 U rj' ?3 H p L D 13 �1���. BG w r9 Marratooka FIGURE 2.2 Point 3 FROM: WATER TABLE CONTOURS AND LOCATIONS OF OBSERVATION WELLS IN SUFFOLK COUNTY,NY MARCH 2002 f A ILE 1 14 12. z - +a t fir' ✓ /S ; 1 °' jay 7 ek l�or j' .nYr. u. . ' y 15. The fraction of nitrogen that is lost as gas or the fraction of nitrogen that • volatilizes or is converted to gaseous N through denitrification. 16. The fraction of wastewater removed by sewers. In this project this number will be zero since no sewers are present. 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater, which the average in the U.S. is 10 lbs/person/day. 18. The nitrogen removal rate of natural land, which is the fraction of nitrogen that is removed by natural land processes before it, reaches groundwater. All the above components are then used to compute the total concentration of nitrogen leached into groundwater. The calculation sheets for each of the scenarios analyzed are provided in Appendix F. The resulting average concentration of nitrogen in the groundwater recharge from the site under each of the scenarios are presented below: Using the above inputs and assumptions, Table 2-2 shows the estimates of nitrogen concentrations in the recharge groundwater at the project site. TABLE 2-2 ESTIMATE OF NITROGEN LOADING OF GROUNDWATER USING BURBS MODEL • Existing Site < 1.0 m Proposed Plan 7.0 M84 Alternative#2 6.4 mg/I Alternative#3 5.0 m Alternative#5 4.4 m It can be concluded from the above table that nitrogen concentrations from this project will be within the acceptable limits of 10 mg/l. Throughout the proposed site, recharge ponds will handle all of the stormwater recharge for the site, including that of the roofs, driveways, roadways, and parking lots. This will allow for the recharge of most of the stormwater that falls at this site to the groundwater aquifer. As designed, this project will maintain the natural drainage pattern of onsite recharge of the precipitation, and as stated, actually increase the recharge due to the decrease in evapotranspiration. This proposed project is very much like the existing recharge of the site. The existing site recharges most of its water into the groundwater on site through the natural leaching processes associated with the soils of the area. As stated the proposed project will maintain all of the stormwater on site and recharging this water via ponds located on the site. There will be no change to the overall natural drainage • patterns that will impact any other properties or change the quantity of water, and in fact it will increase, that will be recharged to the property. 25 One major concern is the degradation of the groundwater caused by substances being • carried into the ground with the recharged water. Stormwater runoff from pavement has been found to be contaminated with coliform and other bacteria, nutrients, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and pesticides. Stormwater runoff has been shown to be the leading source of bacterial loading in the surface waters of Suffolk and Nassau Counties. This has been confirmed by studies done by the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP), which explored alternatives to the disposal of stormwater from urbanized surfaces. However, this study showed that the pollutants in the runoff are not an indicator of the pavement surface but of the watershed area surrounding the site and that reductions in pollutants from the watershed will lead to a reduction of pollutants in the recharge water. As this site is not a major highway, which can collect water not only from its surface runoff but also from the entire watersheds runoff, it will not collect from a wide-ranging area. This will reduce the stormwater contaminants that will enter the drainage system to minor loads from hydrocarbons, and rubber products associated with vehicles and deicing salts. These contaminants will be carried into the recharge system where some chemical and biological treatment will take place further reducing the amount of contaminants to leach into the ground. As this site will have over 30' of sand to scrub the groundwater before it reaches the aquifer, it will be of drinkable quality prior to entering the groundwater (NURP). As this site will only utilize the groundwater for the maintenance of the pond levels during low water periods, and pumpage will be maintained at 40 gal/min, there will be no significant impacts to the groundwater from this project. • Another concern is that the proposed project will impact the local wells of the houses that surround the site, so this was studied. As stated above this project will not be impacting the quantity of the recharge water from the site. Also, and any water that is recharged to groundwater and eventually the aquifer system, in which these wells are associated, will have over 30 feet of sand to filter any contaminants that may enter the system due to the runoff of the streets and any fertilizers that may be placed on the lawns and garden areas. Importantly, interpolation of the groundwater contour map (Figure 2.2) demonstrates that groundwater flows towards the southeast, away from private wells. This stated there will be no significant impact to the water quantity or quality recharged to the groundwater and eventually the aquifer. 2.2.3 Proposed Mitigation Development of the project site could potentially impact the groundwater in several ways, from roadway runoff into the recharge ponds to the disposal of sanitary waste. First, all runoff will be retained on site and recharged to the ground by means of ponds throughout the site. This will allow water to pass through 30' or more of sand, assuring its quality before reaching the aquifer. Due to the reduction of the vegetated areas on the site, recharge of stormwater will actually increase at the proposed project. This is due to reduction of evapotranspiration due to the removal of the vegetation. • 26 Secondly, the only use of groundwater through pumping will be to maintain the pond • levels. All other water will be obtained from the SCWA. This will help to maintain groundwater levels and actual] increase them with the introduction of the sanitary waste grY Y and stormwater runoff into the groundwater system through the use of sanitary leaching systems and stormwater recharge ponds. Also the design of this project will allow for all required sanitary setbacks from drinking water wells in the vicinity of the site. 2.3 Vegetation and Wildlife 2.3.1 Existing Conditions Vegetation and wildlife on the project site were surveyed in June 1988, October 2007 and April 2008. The vegetation communities were mapped by a qualified biologist in October 2007, in accordance with Ecological Communities of New York State (Edinger, et al, 2002) Figure 2-4 presents a habitat map of the property, as mapped in the field. Between 1988 and 2007, there has been a significant change in the vegetational structure, with the successional old field now rapidly transitioning to successional shrubland. In addition, there has been a dramatic invasion of invasive species, according to the New York State Invasive Plant Council, particularly Mugwort, Artemisia vulgaris, which was not present in 1988, and Multiflora Rose, Rosa multiflora, and Black Locust, Robinia • pseudoacacia, which were present in 1988 to a much lesser extent. In fact, the April 2008 inventory determined that fully half of the plant species found on sites are non- native. Unfortunately, the degree of invasive plant coverage can be expected to increase without intervention. In addition, the property will serve as an invasive plant seed bank, which will facilitate the spread of undesirable species throughout the area. It is important to note the difference between open space and habitat. Although the site provides a large block of open space, the highly degraded nature of the habitat, due to invasive species prevalence, detracts enormously from its overall ecological value. For example, while overall 40 bird species have been identified on the property, this is a relatively small number for an undeveloped property of this size. Normally an old farm field at this step of succession could be expected to support double this degree of avian diversity. If the property were to be left as is, with no intervening ecological stewardship, the existing biodiversity will be expected to further decline. The property is used by a variety of mammals, all of which are regionally common, and which are listed in the Ecological Inventory (Appendix D). The property is also used by a variety of birds, which are all also regionally common. The successional development of the property has attracted some common woodland species, such as Downy Woodpecker. At the same time, it is expected that some of the grassland birds, such as Field Sparrow, are decreasing as their habitat is being lost. • 27 Since there are no surface waters or wetlands on the property, reptiles and amphibians are scarce. One species, the Eastern Box Turtle, a far ranging and common species, was • observed on the property. There are no Federal or State listed Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern species on the property. Correspondence with the New York State Natural Heritage Program can be found in Appendix 1. 2.3.2 Anticipated Impacts Construction of the project will require the replacement of successional field/successional scrub and northern hardwoods with a complex of cultural features including buildings, pavement, ponds, lawns, and gardens and vegetated berms. This will result in a reduction in the numbers birds and mammals, although it is expected that all existing species will remain and continue to use the landscaped portions of the site. In addition, the introduction of water features on the property will result in attracting a plethora of wildlife to the site, since there is little available water within a 0.25-mile radius. In addition to attracting a variety of songbirds,the projects water features can be expected to attract occasional waterfowl and waders, and herpetological species, such as Fowler Toad, may colonize the site. The project will have a beneficial impact in terms of removal of highly invasive species, such as mugwort and multiflora rose, thus eliminating a regional seed bank for these extremely deleterious species. • Overall, it is expected that the site's biodiversity will remain at an equivalent or higher level than under existing conditions. This is due to the fact that invasive species will be controlled, while at the same time additional naturalized species and naturalized landscaping will be introduced and managed to facilitate additional habitat. As the project specifications are developed, it may be possible to preserve selected native trees on the property, subject to the need to remove contaminated soils. This possibility will be examined during the design stage. 2.3.3 Proposed Mitigation There are several features designed into the project that will effectively mitigate impacts to vegetation and wildlife. First, the design includes a densely vegetated berm. This will provide habitat for a variety of wildlife. Also, as discussed above, the provision of year- round fresh water will attract myriad wildlife species to the property, many of which are not currently present. All animals require food, cover, and water. Under existing conditions, only food and cover are present. The project will continue to provide food and cover in the berms and other landscaped portions of the site. The addition of water is expected to attract additional wildlife species, resulting in equal or high biodiversity on the property. Finally, invasive vegetation species will be removed from the property. Invasive plant • species pose one of the greatest threats to the conservation of biodiversity on Long 28 zm % - | j �& , .§_ �k �$ In � §I W_ 116 k§ I�■ §2A 86 . I2 J � � � Island. The New York State Invasive Plant Council has stated that over 30% of the • State's flora is non-native in nature. In addition to the benefits to the property from removal of invasive plants, the entire region will benefit as this invasive seed bank is removed. • • 29 3.0 HUMAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 3.1 Transportation • The following discussion of transportation resources presented consists of a summary of the Nelson & Pope Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared November 2007. The entire study report is provided in Appendix B. Correspondence to the Planning Board responding to several comments regarding transportation is included in Appendix 1. Study Methodology The methodology used for this investigation consisted of a detailed review of existing land-use, roadway and traffic conditions near the proposed site for the Existing Condition, the No Build Condition (future traffic conditions without the proposed development), and the Build Condition (future traffic conditions with the proposed development). The Existing Condition was analyzed utilizing existing traffic volumes conservatively adjusted to represent the peak month of the year and existing roadway geometry. The following intersections were studied as requested in the Final Scope for the DEIS: • NYS Route 25 (Main Road)at Depot Lane • Main Road at North Street • Main Road at Griffing Street • Main Road at Highland Road • • Main Road at Crown Land Road • CR 48 (Middle Road)at Depot Lane • Schoolhouse Lane at Depot Lane The No Build Condition traffic volumes consist of the existing volumes adjusted by an annual growth factor to account for increases in population, proposed developments beyond the vicinity of the site, and a seasonal adjustment factor. The traffic volumes generated by the proposed project were calculated and then added to the No Build Condition to determine the traffic volumes for the future Build Condition with the proposed development. The study intersections were then analyzed using Highway Capacity Software (HCS+) by applying the existing field geometry, signal timings, and the calculated traffic volumes to determine levels of service (LOS). The study assesses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development and identifies appropriate mitigation, if necessary. In executing the scope of work, the following steps were undertaken. • A detailed field inspection was conducted to obtain an inventory of existing roadway geometry, location/geometry of existing driveways and intersections along with signing, signal timings,phasing and cycle lengths. • Turning movement volume counts were conducted during the weekday morning (7:00 AM to • 9:00 AM), evening (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM), and Saturday midday (11:00 AM to 2:00 PM) peak periods at the study intersections. 30 • Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) machines were placed along the following locations to • obtain hourly and daily traffic volumes. o Main Road,just west of Depot Road o Depot Lane,just north of Main Road • Hourly traffic volumes were obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) alongMain Road and from Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) along Middle Road, in the vicinity of the site. Each of these roadways is classified under Factor Group 40 indicating that the highways serve both commuter traffic and seasonal traffic. • For a more conservative analysis, the traffic volume collected in October 2007 was "seasonally adjusted"to account for fluctuations in monthly traffic volumes attributed to the seasons. As indicated by the NYSDOT, roadways classified in Factor Group 40 experience the highest traffic volumes in the month of July. The month of July experiences 22% more traffic volume on the weekdays and 20% more on the weekends compared to the month of October. The existing volumes were -seasonally adjusted"(increased) accordingly. • Accident data for the study intersections and roadways in the vicinity of the site was obtained from NYSDOT and summarized by accident severity and type. • Traffic volumes collected in October 2005 were compared to traffic volumes collected in October 2007. It was found that traffic volumes were higher in October 2005, indicating a reduction in background traffic growth. For the purposes of this study an annual traffic growth factor of 1.8% was obtained from the NYSDOT, based on the Long Island Transportation Plan 2000 study on the Town of Southold. This rate was applied to the • existing "seasonally adjusted"traffic volumes to estimate the increase in background traffic that will occur by 2009. • The Town of Southold Planning Department was contacted to obtain information on other planned/pending developments that might impact traffic flow in the study area to be included in the study. • The traffic data was collected at the age-restricted Founders Village residential development on Young's Road in Southold. Trip generation rates were calculated from this data, which were used to project traffic to be generated by the proposed project. • The additional traffic volumes to be generated by the proposed project were calculated and distributed throughout the study intersections, based on current travel patterns. These additional volumes were combined with the No Build condition, which resulted in the 2009 Build Condition. • Capacity analyses were performed at the study intersections using Highway Capacity Software (HCS+) by applying the existing field geometry, signal timings, and calculated traffic volumes to determine levels of service (LOS) for the Existing, No Build and Build Conditions. The results of the analyses for the No Build and Build Conditions were compared to identify any substantial degradation in LOS, which will be considered an impact. • 31 3.1.1 Existing Conditions The following descriptions of existing site transportation resources and traffic conditions • are taken from the TIS. Existing Conditions Land Use The proposed project is to be located on a 45.99-acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Griffing Street and Schoolhouse Lane, approximately 1,079 feet north of Main Road, Cutchogue, New York. The currently vacant site is zoned Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District and surrounded by farmland and residential homes. Both Bridle Lane and Spur Road terminate on the western border or the site. Roadway Network The following is a list of roadways surrounding the site. The general descriptions refer only to the sections of the road that exist in the vicinity of the site. The cross-section of these roads may vary further away. The AADT N Average Annual Daily Traffic is provided for each road, where available from either New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) or the Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW). Main Road (NYS Route 25) is under the jurisdiction of the NYSDOT and extends east- west across the Town of Southold and Suffolk County. It has one travel lane in each • direction, full shoulders, and a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. One traffic signal exists on Main Road in the study area, located at New Suffolk Road with pedestrian crossings. Pedestrian crosswalks exist at Depot Road, which is unsignalized. The average annual daily traffic volume is 11,355 vehicles per day (source: NYSDOT 2002 Traffic Volume Report). North Street is a local residential road under Town of Southold jurisdiction. It extends from Main Road for a short distance to Schoolhouse Lane. It is a low volume roadway with one travel lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Traffic signals do not exist at either intersection on North Street. Grifinjz Street is a local access road under Town of Southold jurisdiction. It extends north-south for a short distance connecting Main Road with Schoolhouse Lane. Currently, Griffing Street terminates at the south end of the proposed site. It has one travel lane in each direction with a short landscaped median and turning lanes at the intersection with Main Road. Griffing Street provides access to a municipal parking lot servicing the local commercial properties as well as the post office. Traffic signals do not exist at either intersection on Griffing Street. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour. Highland Road is a local residential road under Town of Southold jurisdiction extending from Main Road to the residential neighborhood west of the site with no outlets to other • neighborhoods. It is a low volume roadway with one travel lane in each direction and a 32 posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Traffic signals do not exist along Highland • Road. Crown Land Road is a local residential road under Town of Southold jurisdiction. Similar to Highland Road, it extends from Main Road to the residential neighborhood west of the site with no outlets to other neighborhoods. It is also a low volume roadway with one travel lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Traffic signals do not exist along Crown Land Road. Middle Road (CR 48) is under SCDPW jurisdiction and provides a major east-west throughway across the Town of Southold and into the Town of Riverhead where it changes in name to Sound Avenue. Within the study area, the roadway is divided with a landscaped median and two travel lanes in each direction. Exclusive taming lanes are present at the study intersection, which is stop-controlled on Depot Lane in addition to a yellow flashing signal on Middle Road. The average annual daily traffic volume is 14,463 vehicles per day (source: SCDPW 2004) and the posted speed limit is 55 miles per hour. Depot Lane is located east of the site and is under Town of Southold jurisdiction. The roadway extends north-south from Main Road to CR 84(Oregon Road). Depot Lane has one travel lane in each direction and provides a direct connection between Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Middle Road (CR48). Traffic signals do not exist along Depot Road. The posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour. • Schoolhouse Lane is under Town of Southold jurisdiction and extends east-west on the south end of the site with its eastern terminus at Depot Lane and its western terminus at Griffing Street. It has one travel lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Traffic signals do not exist along Schoolhouse Lane. Spur Road is a local residential road under Town of Southold jurisdiction. It extends east- west for a short distance providing access to Highland Road and Crown Land Lane. Currently, Spur Road terminates at the southwest portion of the proposed site. It is a low volume roadway and has one travel lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Traffic signals do not exist along Spur Road. Table 3-1 summarizes the lane configurations and traffic controls at the study intersections. • 33 TABLE 3-1 INTERSECTION GEOMETRY • s "- < .t ff h_ � >, .... � ., ' . teTs � MIAMI t , 0�" ro e Coutr7S a.., r'dwwa P :;r+sg�^§, "y7,. r*tt NYS Route 25 (Main Road) at VEVB TR Stop Control at Depot Lane W1LR SB Depot Lane Approach EB LT Stop Control at Main Road at North Street WB TR SB North Street Approach SB LR EB LT Stop Contro at Main Road at Griffing Street WB LR SB GriffinglStreet Approach SB EB LT Stop Control at Main Road at Highland Road WB TR SB Highland Road Approach SB LR EB LT Stop Control at Main Road at Crown Land Road WB TR SB Crown Land Road SB LR Approach EB L-T-T-R Grass Median on Middle WB L-T-T-R Road (CR 48) and Stop CR 48 (Middle Road) at Depot Lane NB LTR Control at SB LTR NB/SB Depot Lane Approaches • EB LR Yield at Schoolhouse Lane at Depot Lane NB LT EB Schoolhouse Lane SB TR Approach *L=Left turn lane;T=Through lane, R=Right turn lane;LT=Leftoh rough lane;TR=Through/right lane i Traffic Volume Data Turning movement counts were collected at the study intersections on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 during the AM (7:00-9:00 AM), and PM (4:00-6:00) peak periods, and on Saturday, October 27, 2007 during the midday (11:00 AM-2:00 PM) peak period. The peak hour volumes were identified and the peak hour factors were calculated for each intersection For a more conservative analysis the existing traffic volumes were adjusted utilizing seasonal factors for both weekday and weekends. These factors were obtained from data contained in the 2006 NYSDOT Traffic Data Report. These seasonal adjustment factors were developed from NYSDOT continuous data collected for a three-year period. The continuous counter sites are separated into three major factor groups (30, 40, & 60). As defined by the NYSDOT, Factor Group 30 is characteristic of highways carrying heavy commuter traffic with only a small variance of traffic throughout the year; Factor Group 60 is characterized by large seasonal traffic variations; and Factor Group 40 lies between these two extremes. A copy of the section of the 2006 NYSDOT Traffic Data Report that contains the seasonal adjustment factors and the way they were established is included in • Appendix A of the TIS. 34 According to the `Coverage and Special Count Hourly Reports' published by the • NYSDOT, included in Appendix A of the TIS, the sections of Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Middle Road (CR48) in the study area are classified as Factor Group 40 roadways. In accordance with the NYSDOT seasonal factor chart (shown in Appendix A of the TIS) roadways classified under Factor Group 40 experience peak traffic volumes in the month of July. When compared to the month of October (weekday factor: 1.004; weekend factor: 0.974), traffic volumes in July higher by a factor of 0.22 on the weekdays (factor 1.226) and 0.20 on weekends (factor 1.167). Therefore, the existing October weekday and Saturday traffic volumes were increased by 22% and 20%, respectively, to represent traffic volumes for the peak month of the year. The resultant existing seasonally adjusted traffic volumes utilized in the analysis are depicted in Figures 3, 4, and 5 in Appendix B and further detailed in Appendix A of the TIS. Accident History The most recent 3 years of available accident data, July 2004 through June 2007, in the vicinity of the site, was obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). Table 3-2 summarizes the accident data by location and severity of injury and Table 3 of the TIS, summarizes the type of collision. • • 35 TABLE 3-2 ACCIDENT SUMMARY BY SEVERITY • bv&t t, s 'fk=� w ' . ,w "; `" a4�ka � I dtl0rl ° ms`sity` �a�l Pr7er[y y 3 ```' Depot Lane between Oregon Road and Middle Road (CR 48) Depot Lane at Middle 8 6 14 Road (CR48) Depot Lane between of - - - Middle Road (CR48) and Schoolhouse Lane Depot Lane at Schoolhouse Lane Depot Lane between 1 1 Schoolhouse Lane and Main Road (NYS 25) Depot Lane at Main Road - - 2 2 (NYS 25) Main Road (NYS 25) - - - - between Depot Lane and • North Street Main Road (NYS 25) at - - - - North Street Main Road (NYS 25) - - - - between North Street and Griffing Street Main Road (NYS 25) at - - - - Griffing Street Main Road (NYS 25) - - - - between Griffing Street and Highland Road Main Road (NYS 25) at - - - - Highland Road Main Road (NYS 25) - - - - between Highland Road and Crown Land Road Main Road (NYS 25) at - - - - Crown Land Road Griffing Street between - 1 - 1 North Street and Main Road (NYS 25) Total 0 9 9 18 0% 50% 50% 100% • 36 A total of 18 accidents occurred within the study area during the 3-year analysis period. • Half of the accidents involved injuries and half involved property damage. There were no fatal accidents experienced in the vicinity of the site within the time period studied. The greatest number of accidents occurred at the intersection of CR 48 and Depot Lane (14 accidents). A review of the data indicates that excluding non-reportable cases, the plurality of the accidents (44%) involved right angle collisions. Most of the right angle accidents (7 accidents) occurred at the intersection of CR 48 and Depot Lane, which may be caused by drivers failing to yield right-of-way. Existing Condition Analysis The traffic volumes depicted in Figures 5 through 6 (Appendix B) were used with the intersection geometry and traffic control to determine the existing capacity and LOS of the study intersections. Table 3-3 contains the LOS summary for the Existing Condition calculated through the HCS+ software described previously. The detailed analysis worksheets are in Appendix D of the TIS. TABLE 3-3 EXISTING CONDITION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY W 3 t F uiu.�l k� 3 • Main Road (NYS 25) EB L A 9.4 0.08 A 9.5 0.05 A 9.4 0.06 at Depot Lane SB LR D 29.0 0.47 F 51.4 0.62 F 50.1 0.70 Main Road (NYS 25) EB LT A 9.2 0.00 A 9.1 0.00 A 9.2 0.00 at North Street SB LR B 13.7 0.00 D 28.7 0.01 C 21.7 0.05 EB LT A 9.3 0.07 A 9.1 0.04 A 9.1 0.04 Main Road (NYS 25) _ at Griffing Street SB L D 32.5 0.26 D 31.2 0.14 E 37.2 0.37 R B 13.4 0.10 B 13.5 0.08 B 13.7 0.13 Main Road (NYS 25) EB LT A 8.8 0.01 A 8.9 0.01 A 8.6 0.00 at Highland Road ._...__ SB LR C 19.3 0.06 C 19.2 0.05 C 25.0 0.06 Main Road(NYS 25) EB LT A 8.9 0.01 A 8.8 0.01 A 8.8 0.01 at Crown Land Road SB LR C 16.7 0.04 B 14.4 0.03 B 14.2 0.03 EB L A 9.2 0.01 A 9.2 0.02 A 9.0 0.04 WB L A 9.5 0.08 A 9.2 0.04 A 9.1 0.09 Middle Road (CR 48) NB LT D 30.2 0.37 C 24.5 0.27 D 26.8 0.27 at Depot Lane R B 11.5 0.12 B 10.9 0.07 B 10.9 0.10 LT D 25.2 0.11 C 21.4 0.04 C 25.0 0.11 SB - R B 10.7 0.02 B 10.8 0.02 B 10.5 0.02 Schoolhouse Lane at NB LT A 7.6 0.00 A 7.5 0.00 A 7.7 0.00 37 Depot Lane EB LR B 10.2 0.06 A 9.9 0.06 _ B 10.4 0.08 Notes: LOS=Level of Service,Delay=seconds vehicle, VIC= Volume/Capacity Ratio Main Road at Depot Lane As shown in the results contained in the table above, the eastbound left turn movement operates at a LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours. The southbound approach currently operates at LOS D during the AM peak hour and at LOS F during the PM and Saturday peak hours. It is not unexpected to see results of LOS D, E or F for traffic at the stop-controlled approach of an unsignalized intersection with a major roadway. The availability of gaps in the traffic on the major roadway determines the level of delay that is assigned to the stop-controlled traffic. Higher volumes along major roadways result in fewer available gaps. It should be noted that the Town of Southold has recognized the poor LOS at the southbound movement for this intersection and has requested the installation of a traffic signal from the NYSDOT. Main Road at North Street The eastbound Main Road approach currently operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours. The southbound North Street approach currently operates at LOS B, D and C during the weekday AM, weekday PM and Saturday midday peak hours respectively. Main Road at Griff ng Street The eastbound Main Road approach currently operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours. The southbound left-tum movement onto Main Road currently • operates at LOS D during the AM and PM peak hours and at LOS E during the Saturday midday peak hour. The southbound right turn movement operates at LOS B during each of the analyzed peak hours. Main Road at Highland Road The eastbound Main Road approach currently operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours and the southbound Highland Road approach currently operates at LOS B during each of the analyzed peak hours. Main Road at Crown Land Road The eastbound Main Road approach currently operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours. The southbound Crown Land Road approach currently operates at LOS C during the AM peak hour and at LOS B during the PM and Saturday midday peak hours. Middle Road at Depot Lane The eastbound and westbound left-tum movements from Middle Road operate at LOS A during all the analyzed peak hours. The Depot Lane northbound left and through movements operates at LOS D during the AM and Saturday midday peak hours and at LOS C during the PM peak hour. The Depot Lane southbound left and through movements operates at LOS D during the AM peak hour and at LOS C during the PM and Saturday midday peak hours. The Depot Lane northbound and southbound right tum • movements operate at LOS B during each of the analyzed peak hours. 38 • Schoolhouse Lane at Depot Lane Schoolhouse Lane at Depot Lane is controlled by a yield sign on the eastbound approach, however for analysis purposes the eastbound approach was analyzed as stop-controlled resulting in LOS B or better for all time periods. 3.1.2 Anticipated Impacts The following descriptions and discussions of the anticipated transportation-related characteristics and impacts of the proposed project are taken from the TIS. Proposed Development Site Access As depicted on the site plans prepared by Nelson & Pope, two means of access are proposed to serve the residential development. A proposed access will intersect Schoolhouse Lane directly opposite Griffing Street. This access will be stop-controlled and configured for all movements. The second access is provided via Spur Road, which currently terminates at the western boundary of the site. An emergency access will be provided via a connection to Bridle Lane, which also currently terminates at the western boundary of the site. • Trip Generation The Town of Southold Planning Board has rejected the nationally recognized trip generation estimates for an age restricted community provided in the manual, Trip Generation, 7`" Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in 2003. At the Town of Southold Planning Board's request, Nelson & Pope has conducted traffic counts at a similar age restricted residential development (Founders Village) located on Youngs Road in Southold to develop trip generation rates for the proposed age restricted development. Founders Village contains 92 age-restricted residential condominium units. The data was collected by means of automatic traffic recorders (ATR) placed at the exit and entrance driveways of the Founders Village development for a 7-day period. The site data (shown in Appendix B of the TIS) indicates that 31, 16, and 47 vehicles entered or exited the development during the weekday AM, PM, and Saturday midday time periods, respectively. This translates to a trip/unit rate of 0.34, 0.17 and 0.51 during the weekday AM, PM and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. Based on these calculated rates, the following table summarizes the trips anticipated to be generated by the proposed 139 age-restricted residential condominium units. • 39 TABLE 3-4 TRIP GENERATION • m Tota # E�7 }�a low- Trip Trip generation 0.15 0.19 0.34 0.08 0.09 0.17 0.27 0.24 0.51 rates (trips/unit) 139 age-restricted Condominium 21 26 47 11 13 24 38 33 71 units Source: Traffic Counts collected at Founders Village,Southold,NY As shown in Table 7 of the TIS (Table 3-4 above), the proposed residential development is projected to generate 47 trips in the weekday AM peak hour (21 entering, 26 exiting), 24 trips in the weekday PM peak hour (II entering, 13 exiting), and 71 trips in the Saturday midday peak hour(38 entering, 33 exiting). Trip Distribution and Assignment The site-generated traffic volume was distributed and assigned to each movement at the study intersections based on the existing roadway and travel patterns demonstrated in October 2007. The nature of the proposed land uses and its associated travel patterns were considered as well. Figure 7 (Appendix B) presents the trip distribution for the • weekday AM, PM, and Saturday peak hours. Figures 8 through 10 (Appendix B) depict the actual site-generated volumes for the respective peak hours. The site-generated volumes were then added to the No Build Condition volumes resulting in the Build Condition volumes shown in Figures I 1 through 13 (Appendix B). Traffic Impact Anal As stated previously, the intersection capacity and level-of-service (LOS) analyses were based on the procedures and guidelines presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (2000), published by the Transportation Research Board. The FHWA Highway Capacity Software Release 5.21 was used to analyze the study intersections and provide a LOS measurement of the intersection operations. The six classes of LOS, ranging from LOS A (excellent) to F (worst), are defined in Appendix C of the TIS. Each study intersection was analyzed for the Existing, No Build, and Build Conditions. Table 3-5 illustrates the LOS summary for the study intersections and the site access at Griffing Street. Detailed capacity analysis worksheets and a detailed LOS summary table can be found in Appendix D of the TIS. • 40 • TABLE 3-5 LEVEL OyyF SERVICE SUMMARY p y Kak �71 }'SPIOAfi Ea z. Tm RIP N ir .�.1z a., :4= Xw _m1 .,a. e I+Q 'Ia M A c % _ a Existing EB L A 9.4 0.08 A 9.5 0.05 A 9.4 0.06 Main Road SB LR D 29.0 0.47 F 51.4 0.62 F 50.1 0.70 (NYS 25) at No Build EB L A 9.5 0.08 A 9.6 0.05 A 9.6 0.06 Depot Lane SB LR D 32.1 0.51 F 61.4 0.69 F 61.6 0.77 Build EB L A 9.5 0.09 A 9.6 0.05 A 9.6 0.06 SB LR D 34.9 0.54 F 65.2 0.71 F 68.3 0.81 Existing EB LT A 9.2 0.00 A 9.1 0.00 A 9.2 0.00 Main Road SB LR B 13.7 0.00 D 28.7 0.01 C 21.7 0.05 (NYS 25) at No Build EB LT A 9.3 0.00 A 9.1 0.00 A 9.3 0.00 North Street SB LR B 14.0 0.00 D 30.4 0.01 C 22.8 0.06 Build EB LT A 9.3 0.00 A 9.1 0.00 A 9.4 0.00 SB LR C 24.1 0.02 D 30.7 0.01 D 25.9 0.08 Existing EB LT A 9.3 0.07 A 91.1 0.04 A 9.1 0.04 SB L D 32.5 0.26 D 31.2 0.14 E 37.2 0.37 R B 13.4 0.10 B 13.5 0.08 B 13.7 0.13 I ?ain Road No Build EB LT A 9.4 0.08 A 9.2 0.04 A 9.2 0.04 S 25)at SB L E 35.8 0.29 D 33.7 0.16 E 41.3 0.41 tinffing Street R B 13.7 0.11 B 13.9 0.09 B 14.0 0.14 Build EB LT A 9.4 0.08 A 9.3 0.04 A 9.3 0.05 SB L E 37.4 0.32 D 34.2 0.17 E 44.3 0.44 R B 13.8 0.13 B 14.0 0.09 B 142 0.15 Existing EB LT A 8.8 0.01 A 8.9 0.01 A 8.6 0.00 Main Road SB LR C 19.3 0.06 C 19.2 0.05 C 25.0 0.06 (NYS 25) at No Build EB LT A 8.9 0.01 A 90.0 0.01 A 8.6 0.01 Highland Road SB LR C 20.1 0.06 C 20.1 0.05 D 26.4 0.06 Build EB LT A 8.9 0.01 A 9.0 0.01 A 8.7 0.01 SB LR C 19.6 0.07 C 19.7 0.05 C 23.6 0.07 Existing EB LT A 8.9 0.00 A 8.8 0.01 A 8.8 0.01 Main Road SB LR C 16.7 0.04 B 14.4 0.03 B 14.7 0.03 (NYS 25)at No Build EB LT A 9.0 0.00 A 8.9 0.01 A 8.9 0.01 Crown Land Road SB LR C 17.3 0.04 B 14.9 0.03 C 15.1 0.04 Build EB LT A 9.0 0.00 A 8.9 0.01 A 9.0 0.01 SB LR C 16.6 0.05 B 14.8 0.03 B 15.0 0.04 • 41 Uli}sig4'�ttxed= E xia,"" ' ,S P6otac PlvlT'ea7t•`I olu S aYPe vui '• �ti + �- >« 1 ` .Corldl#7toa Ap'proech�-t.1�16 4 Existing EB L A 9.2 0.01 A 9.2 0.02 A 9.0 0.04 WB L A 9.5 0.08 A 9.1 0.04 A 9.1 0.09 NB LT D 30.2 0.37 C 24.5 0.27 D 26.8 0.27 R B 11.5 0.12 B 10.9 0.07 B 10.9 0.10 SB LT D 25.2 0.11 C 21.4 0.04 C 25.0 0.11 R B 10.7 0.02 B 10.8 0.02 B 10.5 0.02 No Build EB L A 9.4 0.02 A 9.3 0.02 A 9.1 0.04 WB L A 9.7 0.09 A 9.3 0.05 A 9.2 0.10 Middle Road NB LT E 35.9 0.43 D 26.1 0.29 D 28.7 0.29 (CR 48)at Depot Lane R B 11.9 0.16 B 11.1 0.08 B 10.9 0.11 SB LT D 27.6 0.11 C 22.2 0.04 D 26.4 0.13 R B 11.1 0.02 B 10.9 0.02 B 10.6 0.02 Build EB L A 9.4 0.02 A 9.3 0.02 A 9.1 0.04 WB L A 9.7 0.09 A 9.3 0.05 A 9.1 0.10 NB LT E 37.5 0.46 D 26.3 0.30 D 30.0 0.33 R B 12.0 0.16 B 11.1 0.08 B 11.0 0.11 SB LT D 27.9 0.11 C 22.2 0.04 D 26.8 0.13 R B 11.1 0.02 B 10.9 0.02 B 10.6 0.02 Existing NB LT A 7.6 0.00 A 7.5 0.00 A 7.7 0.00 EB LR B 10.2 0.06 A 9.9 0.06 B 10.4 0.08 Schoolhouse Lane No Build NB LT A 7.6 0.00 A 7.5 0.00 A 7.7 0.00 • at Depot Lane EB LR B 10.2 0.06 A 9.9 0.06 B 10.4 0.08 Build NB LT A 7.6 0.01 A 7.5 0.00 A 7.7 0.01 EB LR B 10.4 0.08 A 10.0 0.07 B 10.7 0.11 Site Access at Build EB LT A 7.3 0.00 A 7.3 0.00 A 7.3 0.01 tariffing Schoolhouse Lane SB LR A 8.9 0.02 A 8.7 0.01 A 9.0 0.03 _ Notes: LOS=Level of Sen ice,Delay=seconds/vehicle, VIC= Volume/Capacity Ratio Main Road (NYS 25) at Depot Lane The southbound approach currently operates at LOS F in the PM and Saturday midday peak hours. As traffic increases due to background growth and project generated traffic volume the southbound approach will remain at a LOS F during the No Build and Build Conditions. However, as shown in the table, the southbound approach delay will increase by 3.8 seconds and 6.7 seconds during the PM and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively, when comparing the No Build Condition and Build Condition. It is our the estimated project generated traffic is not a opinion that, the increase in delay due to p � substantial degradation on LOS and therefore should not be considered significant. As shown in the LOS definitions (Appendix C of the TIS), changes in LOS are attributed to average vehicle delays increasing by 10 and 15 seconds, which are more than double the delay increases at the southbound approach. Although a LOS F is considered unacceptable to most drivers, this condition often occurs with over saturation, i.e., when • traffic volume exceed the capacity (v/c > 1.0). In both the PM and Saturday Build Condition peak periods the southbound v/c ratios are 0.71 and 0.81, respectively. This indicates that under the Build Condition the southbound approach has the capacity for 42 traffic volumes to increase by 44% and 24% prior to during the peak PM and Saturday • periods,respectively. Main Road(NYS 25) at North Street After the completion of the proposed project, all the approach movements to the intersection of Main Road and North Street will continue to operate at No Build levels of service, with the exception of the southbound approach that changed from LOS B to C during the AM peak hour and from LOS C to D during the Saturday midday peak hour. As shown in the table, the southbound approach delay will increase by 10.1 seconds and 3.1 seconds during the PM and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively, when comparing the No Build Condition and Build Condition. It is our opinion that, the increase in delay due to the estimated additional to 1 and 3 project generated trips in the PM and Saturday periods, respectively, will not generate a substantial change in level of service and therefore should not be considered significant. Main Road(NYS 25) at Grii fing Street The southbound left turn movement currently operates at LOS D during the AM and PM peak hours and at LOS E during the Saturday midday peak hour. As traffic increases due to background growth in 2009 this approach will operate at LOS E, LOS D, and LOS E in their respective peak periods and will continue to operate at these levels once the project is constructed. Therefore degradation in LOS at this intersection will not occur due to project generated traffic. • Main Road(NYS 25) at Highland Road The southbound approach currently operates at LOS C during each of the analyzed peak hours and will continue to operate at these LOS once the project is constructed. Therefore, degradation in LOS at this intersection will not occur due to project generated traffic. Main Road(NYS 25) at Crown Land Road The southbound approach currently operates at LOS C or better during the analyzed peak hours and will continue to operate at these LOS once the project is constructed. Therefore, degradation in LOS at this intersection will not occur due to project generated traffic. Middle Road(CR 48) at Depot Lane All movements will operate at the No Build condition levels of service during the Build condition in each peak period. Once the project is constructed this movement will not experience any degradation in LOS during any of the study time periods. Therefore degradation in LOS at this intersection will not occur due to project generated traffic. Schoolhouse Lane at Depot Lane As mentioned previously the eastbound approach is currently controlled by a yield sign but for the purposes of this study it was analyzed as a stop-control. The intersection currently operates at LOS A for the northbound left turn and eastbound turning • movements. These movements will continue to operate at LOS A and B in the No Build and Build Conditions. Therefore degradation in LOS at this intersection will not occur due to project generated traffic. 43 3.1.3 Proposed Mitigation As shown in the Table 8 3-5 and in the intersection summaries above, substantial • degradations in LOS were not found to occur due to project generated traffic when comparing the future No Build and Build scenarios. Therefore, the proposed development will not generate traffic impacts that are considered significant. As a result, mitigation is not required. 3.2 Land Use, Zoning and Plans 3.2.1 Existing Conditions Zoning The existing zoning of the proposed project site is Hamlet Density Residential (HD). The purpose of the HD zoning is to permit a mix of housing types and level of residential density that are appropriate in and around the major hamlet centers of the area. Particularly, this site will bring an increase in the consumers around Mattituck, Cutchogue, Southold, Orient and the Village of Greenport. Though this property is bordered by farmland and is a rather large (45.99 acres) it has never been designated for farmland preservation. The surrounding areas of the project vary in the zoning. According to the Town of Southold New Zoning Map Figure 1.1, to the west and the southeast of the project site zoning is R-40. This zone was set up to allow for development in areas where smaller lots will not change the neighborhood characteristics and where water supply and environmental conditions will allow such a development. To • the north is (AC) Agriculture Conservation and to the East is R-80 Residential Low Density. Both of these zoning districts allow for a 2-acre minimum lot. These zones were set up to try and control the loss of open lands in the town and the try and preserve the open rural feeling of the area. To the south of the property is zoned Hamlet Business. This zoning allows for the creation of business development in the areas around the hamlet central business areas. This zoning allows for retail, office and other types of business as well as hotels, motels and multifamily residential development. Zoning map is provided as figure I-1 Plans This subsection identifies those previous land use plans, studies and analyses prepared for the Town and/or area encompassing the project site, and therefore may contain recommendations pertinent to the proposed project. Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Report (1994) - This report provides general and specific recommendations to achieve the numerous land use and resource protection goals (including affordable housing) presented in the various prior studies and plans applicable in the Town. Seaview Trails of the North Fork (1994) - This is a Town Transportation Committee/Commission report that identifies primarily bicycle and kayaking trails and routes, in order to identify scenic corridors (including off-road trails) within the Town. • The subject site is presently an inland property occupied by successional field vegetation; no water bodies are present or adjacent, and no footpaths or bicycle trails are present. 44 • Peconic Estuary Program (1995) - This is a plan to improve environmental conditions and water quality within the nationally significant Peconic Estuary. This program includes the following components: environmental resources documentation and analysis, environmental monitoring, watershed analysis, land use/water quality correlation, best management practice recommendations, and land use and water quality improvement recommendations. Economic Development Plan (1997) - This is a plan for Southold's economic health, recognizing agriculture and fishing as important economic stimuli in the Town, as well as hamlet centers, tourism and eco-tourism. The study recognizes the importance of an economic development plan to manage tourism, encourage bed and breakfasts, provide visitor information, and maintain and enhance the unique agricultural, mariculture and commercial fishing aspects of the Town's economy. Southold Township: 2000 Planning Initiatives (1997) - This document represents a step past the Stewardship Task Force Report of 1994, to fill in gaps in the Town's Comprehensive Plan of 1985 and promote sound, long-term planning consistent with the goals of that Plan. This Initiative provides the basic commitment for starting and maintaining the Town's Geographic Information System. Community Preservation Project Plan (CPPP; 1998) - This plan was prepared in • response to the enactment of the Peconic Bay Region Community Preservation Act, which authorized the creation of a fund for land acquisition financed by revenues generated by a newly established 2 percent real estate transfer tax. The legislation requires the preparation of a plan (the CPPP) to guide the acquisition of properties with the above-noted funds. The CPPP contains a listing of properties that will be eligible to participate in this program. It indicates which types of properties should be given the highest priority for either preservation or protection. It provides descriptions of the numerous mechanisms by which the Town can preserve or otherwise protect specific parcels in cooperation with the owner. It should be noted that the subject property was listed in the CPPP as a parcel eligible for preservation It was classified in the list as "open space, including agricultural lands " County Route 48 Corridor, Land Use Study (1999) - This study provides recommendations to the Town Board regarding appropriate land use and zoning in this corridor. This report resulted in upzonings to maintain the integrity of the corridor in the context of Town-wide planning efforts, and removes some of the business-zoned lands that could have promoted sprawl, and/or inappropriate or incompatible development along this multi-use corridor. It should be noted that the project site is not located on CR 48 nor is it located within the CR 48 corridor. • Farm and Farmland Preservation Program (1983-2002) and Southold Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (2000) - These documents provide a number of recommendations to preserve and protect both farmland and the business of farming in 45 the Town. The Strategy contains a full inventory of the acreages and types of farm and crop uses present in the Town around 1999, and remains an important resource for • understanding and promoting the Town's agricultural land use base. It should be noted that the subject site is presently unused and covered by successional field vegetation; no agricultural activity is present. Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy (2000) - This planning report provides the Town with a strategy to ensure the protection of a sufficient quality and quantity of groundwater for present and projected future uses and needs, and to ensure that both the rural character of the Town and its agricultural uses are maintained. The report recognizes that a balance must be struck between maintenance of agricultural use and watershed protection area, and outlines a number of land use techniques and recommended zoning initiatives to achieve water protection goals within the Town. Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan (2001) - This is a study prepared for the Town's two highway corridors: County Road 48 and NYS Route 25. The qualities of these corridors are recognized, and measures are outlined to protect the character of these corridors for Townwide benefit. Preservation/protection techniques such as setbacks, scenic easements, signage parameters and other measures are outlined for use and consideration by the Town. It is noted that the subject site is not located along either CR 48 or NYS Route 25, and is not within the CR 48 corridor. In regard to NYS Route 25, the subject site is located an • estimated 800 feet from this roadway, and so is not within the corridor along this roadway. As a result, the recommendations of this plan do not apply to the subject site. Blue Ribbon Commission for Rural Southold (2002) - This report provides recommendations designed to preserve farmland, open space and the rural aesthetics associated with agriculture and open space preservation in the Town. The report establishes goals for preservation of 80 percent of the remaining farmland and open space, with a development density reduction of 60 percent. This report outlines the initial provisions for a Rural Incentive District and recognizes conservation subdivision, continuation of Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) and Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)programs as primary land use tools to achieve these goals. Southold Comprehensive Implementation Strategy (CIS) and GEIS (2003) - This action determine, collated, analyzed and considered implementation of planning and program tools and mechanisms described and recommended in the numerous planning studies undertaken within Southold over the previous 20 years. These studies, plans and recommendations (most of which are also included here) were reviewed in terms of Town needs and goals, in order to achieve the Town's vision as articulated in those plans. Review of the plans and studies found that many newer documents reiterated prior recommendations, resulting in much consistency between studies and the goals of the Town over the years. The CIS involved primarily legislative changes, with no specific physical changes proposed. Implementation will be achieved through a set of amendments to the Southold Town Code and various Town regulations, procedures, • policies, planning and management initiatives, and will require the approval of the Town Board. 46 • The Town Board formed a working group/moratorium team for the express purpose of determining a legally defensible, cost-effective, efficient and effective implementation strategy to achieve the Town's goals. The group examined the Town's needs, resources and database, which indicated a need to translate the above-noted studies and Town Board initiatives into a cohesive plan, in the form of a package of legislation and procedures. The Moratorium Team synthesized a total of 43 different recommendations. The Town Board initially considered all relevant prior recommendations with an emphasis on those that protect farmland and open space, promote affordable housing, and preserve natural resources. The Town's objectives in focusing on these goals were twofold: 1) to maintain the unique cultural and historic sense of place found within Southold's communities, and 2) to maintain the high quality of the Town's environmental resources. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2005) - This program document provides planning and environmental information and data that may be utilized to formulate development strategies to encourage and protect the waterfront areas of the Town. It emphasizes the Town-wide importance of coastal zone and traditional maritime uses in terms of the commercial and recreational qualities of the Town. It also recommends waterfront access and water-dependent/water-enhanced uses, and provides a compendium of information relating to coastal and Town-wide resources. • Southold Hamlet Study (2005) - This study was conducted by the Town to determine the land use characteristics, capabilities and needs of the various hamlets in Southold, to then establish a vision for each hamlet, and then to provide recommendations that will achieve that vision. As part of the study, the downtown portion of each hamlet was mapped into a Hamlet Locus (HALO) Zone, within which the vision and associated recommendations will apply. The visions were delineated by examining each HALO Zone's resources and, in consultation with a stakeholder's committee, to identify that zone's strengths and weaknesses in terms of: Quality of Life, Housing, Traffic/Transportation, Business, Services and Location. Long Island North Shore Heritage Area (2005) - In 1998, the NYS Legislature established the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area (LINSHA), which is comprised of the numerous governmental entities along the North Shore from New York City to Orient Point, and south to the LIE. A Planning Commission was established for this area, for which a Management Plan was prepared and adopted in 2005. The Plan divided the LINSHA into five thematic -neighborhoods", based on common characteristics of land use and landscapes; the entire North Fork constitutes the "Harvest Coast" neighborhood. The Plan articulates five standards: Protection, Connection, Packaging, Promotion and Partnership. The Management Plan sets forth a framework with specific actions and policies for achieving the goals and objectives articulated in the Plan. It is an overall, holistic, and unifying strategy for the threefold mission of preservation, protection of natural resources as part of the process of inevitable development ("sustainable heritage • development") and using heritage interpretation and awareness as a source of economic vitality. The Plan is now the official policy of New York State for the area. 47 Town Affordable Housing Needs Assessment (2005) - The Town prepared this document to assist in its development of a response to the long-tern trend toward higher housing costs, particularly on the north fork. It represents its comprehensive effort to identify the • housing needs for the Town to further complement its planning efforts in this matter. In general, there has become a critical need to provide for housing that is affordable to moderate-income households. To provide information necessary in this planning effort, this report obtained and collated information on the Town's existing housing stock housing stock trends, and demographic and socioeconomic information on the community. The data clearly indicates that year-round residents who do not already own homes will have limited abilities to do so without assistance. Community Preservation Project Plan Update (2006) - This document provides updated information on those parcels of land on the Town's List of Eligible parcels, which was developed in 1998 for the overall CPPP. This updated information includes parcels to be added to the List, deletion of parcels developed or obtained under the CPPP, and corrected tax lot numbers on some of the listed parcels. As with the original plan, the subject property was listed in this plan as eligible le forpreservation North Fork Recreational Travel Needs Assessment (2001) - As part of the Long Island Transportation Plan to Manage Congestion (also known as LITP 2000), this document reviews travel issues of the rural and recreational areas of the North Fork, and seeks to better satisfy the transportation needs for a study area that includes parts of the Towns of Riverhead, Southold and Shelter Island. The assessment offers recommendations including increased and/or different patterns of local transit service by Suffolk County • Transit, increased and/or different patterns of service by the Long Island Rail Road, and increased and/or different patterns of local fent' operations. There were also suggestions made regarding local roads, including new signage along roads showing -Best Route to. ", and improving major roads for increased carving capacity and increased safety measures. No specific recommendations were made for infrastructure changes to either CR 48 or CR 58. Town Zoning Maps/Code and Comprehensive Plan - The Town of Southold does not have a current, adopted Master or Comprehensive Land Use Plan that specifically articulates the future vision of the community. The most recent Master Plan dates back to 1985, and there have been a number of changes in the regional and Town planning environment that were later addressed in a series of important studies. These studies, together with the zoning law, building zone map and the record of decisions on land use projects by the various Town Boards, constitutes the direction of the Town's thinking in terms of a comprehensive plan. 3.2.2 Anticipated Impacts Zonin As the proposed project will conform to the existing zoning of the site there are no significant impacts anticipated with this project. This project will also conform with the zoning of the areas surrounding the site. As shown in Figure 1.1 the surrounding areas • are also residentially zoned, to the west and the southeast of the project site zoning is R- 40, which is Residential Low Density AA with the houses on 1-acre plots of land. This 48 zone was set up to allow for development in areas where smaller lots will not change the • neighborhood characteristics and where water supply and environmental conditions will allow such a development. It is anticipated that through the use of architecture similar to that of the area and the creation of the vegetated berms this project will blend into the surrounding area and creating, if any, a small amount of change to the overall look of the area. Plans Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Report (1994) - The proposed project will provide a significant number of affordable residential units, which conforms to the applicable general recommendation of this plan. Therefore, no significant adverse impact is anticipated with respect to this plan. Seaview Trails of the North Fork (1994) - The proposed residential project does not include walking trails for either site residents or for community use, though sidewalks are proposed along the site's internal roadway for the use and convenience of the site's residents. While the project does not provide such an amenity (as generally recommended by this plan), its absence is not significant on a Townwide basis, as sufficient amounts of undeveloped land and/or open space remain available on which to locate this feature. In addition, the property is located in close proximity to Cutchogue hamlet, and as a result walking within the hamlet is expected to occur. Peconic Estuary Program (1995) - It is noteworthy that the project site is not located in • proximity to the Peconic Estuary, and is separated from the shoreline by multi-lane roadways and developed areas. Nevertheless, it is possible for activities on the subject to impact water quality within the estuary via surface runoff flow. By such a mechanism, chemical substances and/or eroded soil may be carried from the site southward to the estuary in stormwater runoff. However, it is anticipated that, as the project will be subject to the thorough review and approval processes of the Town and County for the site plan and drainage system, and by conformance to the applicable stormwater handling regulations, the potential for impacts to the Peconic Estuary will be minimized. The project is proposed at a land use density which is less than the maximum allowable flow permitted under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. As a result, no significant adverse impacts are expected to this resource. Economic Development Plan (1997) - The proposed project is a private residential development for retirement-age households, and has a significant affordable component; it does not include any agricultural, fishing or commercial components or facilities or amenities for use by the public or local community. As a result, the recommendations of this plan do not apply, and no significant impacts are anticipated. • 49 Southold Township: 2000 Planning Initiatives (1997) - The proposed project represents development in conformance with its existing HD (Hamlet Density) zoning, which was • applied to this site by the Town Board subsequent to prior review. In this respect, the zoning (and therefore the proposed project) represents the type of use and yield considered appropriate for this particular property, after analysis by the Town Board. Therefore, this project conforms to this plan, and no significant adverse impacts will occur. Community Preservation Project Plan (CPPP; 1998) - The ownership of the project site has not been contacted by the administration of the CPPP with an offer to purchase the site for preservation, or for the purchase of the site's development rights. Therefore, there are no significant impacts to or from this plan with respect to the proposed project. County Route 48 Corridor, Land Use Study (1999) - As the subject property is not located on or within the CR 48 corridor, the recommendations of this plan do not apply to the proposed project and, hence, no significant adverse impacts will occur. Farm and Farmland Preservation Program (1983-2002) and Southold Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (2000) - As noted above, the subject site is presently a naturally-vegetated property; no agricultural activity is presently occurring here, and no such use has been found on this site for some time. As such, the recommendations of these plans will not apply, and therefore no significant adverse impacts are expected. Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy (2000) - The proposed • project will conform to the amount of sanitary wastewater (and hence, of the volume of water consumed for domestic purposes) allowed by Article 6 of the SCSC. In addition, it will provide for on-site treatment and recharge of all sanitary wastewater generated, through the use of septic systems. These will be subject to the review and approval of the SCDHS, which has jurisdiction in this regard. In consideration of this, it is anticipated that no significant adverse impact to groundwater resources will occur. Recommendations related to agricultural use or activities do not apply, as no such uses exist or are proposed. Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan (2001) - As noted above, the subject site is not located within either of the corridors centered on CR 48 or NYS Route 25. Therefore, the recommendations of this plan do not apply to the proposed project, and no significant impacts will occur. Blue Ribbon Commission for Rural Southold (2002) - It is acknowledged that the subject site is presently a naturally vegetated open space (occupied by successional field species), and will be considered a prime candidate for preservation or reduced-density residential development. However, the site is zoned HD by the Town, which is a zoning type intended for increased density development due to the presence or proximity of necessary infrastructure and a complementary land use pattern. The project will be developed in • conformance with its zoning; no increased density or yield is proposed. It should also be noted that the landowner has been approached with an offer to purchase the site or to 50 obtain its development rights (for either a PDR or TDR action). Letter from Southold • Town enclosed in Appendix H. As a result, it is anticipated that no significant impacts to the recommendations of this plan will occur. Southold Comprehensive Implementation Strategy (CIS) and GEIS(2003) - The proposed project has been designed to conform to all applicable Town requirements, as reflected in the Town Zoning Code. As the recommendations of the CIS are to be implemented by revisions and/or amendments to the Town Code and/or other applicable land use policies, it is expected that conformance to these regulations will simultaneously conform to the recommendations of the CIS. As the proposed project conforms to the Town Code, no significant adverse impacts to the CIS are anticipated. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2005) - The LWRP recognizes the Town zoning map and the hamlet study initiative. Proposed zoning and access recommendations primarily relate to the more immediately coastal zone area. The LWRP did not recommend any changes in the current zoning with respect to the subject property; as a result, no significant adverse impacts are expected with respect to this plan. Southold Hamlet Study (2005) -As the subject site is not located in the Cutchogue HALO Zone, the recommendations of this plan will not apply to the site or to the proposed project, and no significant impacts are anticipated. • Long Island North Shore Heritage Area (2005) - The proposed project will conform to those Preservation Policies that apply to this private development application. Specifically, construction will include use of environmentally-friendly materials and mechanical systems where possible, will conform to applicable design and development requirements, and will employ sound land use and siting principles in its project layout. In this way, no significant ficant adverse impacts related to this plan are expected. Town Affordable Housing Needs Assessment (2005) - The proposed project includes a number of its residences (10%) as affordable units, which will assist in addressing the Town's concerns in this matter. Community Preservation Project Plan Update (2006) - The owner of the subject site has not been contacted in regard to the potential for public purchase of the site or its development rights, as part of the CPPP. Therefore, there remain no potential significant adverse impacts with respect to this plan for the proposed project. North Fork Recreational Travel Needs Assessment (2001) - The subject site would be accessed primarily by NYS Route 25, so that recommendations regarding measures to reduce traffic volume and congestion on this roadway (in favor of CR 48 and CR 58) would benefit the proposed project. These include installation of-Best Route to. " signs (to help reduce recreational usage of this roadway and thereby improve service for local • residents), and improved public transit service (as an increased availability and range of destinations would attract project residents use of this resource). 51 Town Zoning Maps/Code and Comprehensive Plan - As noted above, the Town of Southold does not presently have a current comprehensive or master land use plan. In • lieu of such a document, the Town utilizes its Zoning Code and the recommendations of the various land use plans and studies (of which those applicable to the project site are addressed in this section) to provide a framework within which development in the Town is to take place. The proposed project has been designed to conform to the requirements of the HD zone, as well as to the various requirements of the SCSC, particularly Article 6. It is therefore anticipated that conformance to these regulations and requirements will minimize if not eliminate the potential for significant adverse impacts to the Town's resources (which is the goal and intent of these regulations). 3.2.3 Proposed Mitigation The above discussions of the project's conformance to those aspects and/or recommendations of the above-listed land use plans and studies uniformly indicate that no significant adverse impacts will occur. Therefore, no further mitigation (beyond the current site design and project components)is necessary or proposed. 3.3 Community Facilities and Services 3.3.1 Existing Conditions The project site is served by the following service districts and community service • providers: • Cutchogue District • Mattituck-Cutchogue Union Free District • Suffolk County Water Authority • Southold Police Department • Lone Island Power Authority • National Grid Natural Gas Information regarding these community resources as well as the related fiscal considerations is discussed in this section. Tax Revenue The 45.99 acre subject property consists of the following Suffolk County Tax Map parcels: 1000-102-01-33.3. Based on 2006/2007 tax bills, under existing conditions the property taxes generated by the site are $12,378.98. Approximately $8,719.35 or 70.43 percent of the total taxes generated by the site are distributed to the Mattituck-Cutchog_ue Union Free School District which includes the Cutchogue Library District The balance of the revenue generated by the parcel is apportioned to various local Town and Suffolk County taxing districts. • 52 Table 3-6 provides a summary of the tax districts, tax rates and assessed valuation as • illustrated on the tax bill for the subject site. The future taxes generated by the proposed project will be discussed in more detail in Section 3.3.2. TABLE 3-6 EXISTING TAX REVENUE Jurisdiction Tax Rate Taxes Paid /$100 assessed School District-Mattituck Cutchogue 682.26 J71U.44 Libna a District-Cutcho e 62.984 736.91 County Tax 15.953 186.65 Town Tax 194.478 J2—Z75 40 NYS Real Pro Tax 9.859 115.35 Cutchogue Fire District 74.02866.03 Waste Water District 1.88 $2.20 Solid Waste District 12.29 JL14.00 TOTAL 1.053.724 $12,378.98 Police The proposed site is under the jurisdiction of the town of Southold Police Department. Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. sent a letter on October 17, 2007 advising the department of the proposed project and requesting any information regarding the availability of police- related services. We are still waiting on a response from the Southold Police Department on this matter. A second letter was sent on May 12, 2008 to the Southold Police Department requesting their input on the proposed development project In addition a phone call was made on January 13, 2009 to Chief Cochran of the Southold Police department Chief Cochran indicated that once he received a faxed copy of the initial request letter, a response would be provided As of January 16 2009 a response from the Southold Police Department has not vet been received. Currently, the police department has one station located at 41405 Main Road in Peconic. Fire The proposed project is located in the Cutehogue Fire District and serviced by the Cutchogue Fire Department. The District serves an approximately I I square mile area with one station located at 260 New Suffolk Road. An inquiry letter was sent to the Department in October of 2007, requesting information on the size, response time and any other information on the department. We are still waiting on a response to this inquiry. A second letter was sent on May 12, 2008 to the fire district requesting their input with respect to any potential concerns in providing service for the project. In addition a phone call was made on January 13 2009 to determine the status of the response of the letter. At the time of this printing, we are still awaiting a response from the Cutchogue Fire District The fire department's website provides some information regarding available equipment which includes three Class A Engines a Heavy Rescue/Command Unit two Fire/Police Units a Brush Truck a Supply Pumper, and an . ambulance. 53 School District The subject property is located within the Mattituck-Cutcho ue Union Free School . District. An inquiry letter was sent to the school district on May 12, 2008 for any input into the impact that this project will have on the school. In addition, a phone call was made on January 13, 2009 to the Superintendant's Office to determine the status of the response letter. The letter was faxed to Superintendent McKenna and at the time of this printing we are still awaiting a response from the school on the project. Currently, the subject site generates approximately $7,982 per year in taxes for the school district. This revenue aids in supporting the district's two schools, which include Cutchogue East Elementary and Mattituck Jr. and Sr. High. Based on the October 2006 Report Card to the New York State Legislature, these schools had a total enrollment of 1,732 students and the expenditures by the school district per pupil totaled $16,213 for the 2006-2007 school year. As the subject property is currently vacant, no school aged children are generated to the Mattictuck-Cutchogue Union Free School District. Utilities Letters have been sent to all the utilities of the area regarding their availability in the area. Utilities for the site would be serviced by LIPA/National Chid and the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA). Figure 1-4 depicts the existing water main infrastructure in the vicinity of the subject site. A letter requesting information regarding service availability was sent to each utility provider in October of 2007. 3.3.2 Anticipated Impact • Tax Revenue Community services and facilities are supported by tax revenue. The future tax revenue generated by the proposed project has been estimated by the Town Assessor's office to range between $350,000 to $400,000 (see Appendix I). As a range was provided for the proposed project, a median value of$375,000 was utilized for the p tMose of the analysis of individual tax revenue for each tax district provided below. Based on this estimate, the proposed project is expected to generate approximately $375,000 in annual taxes (see Table 3-7), which represents a net increase of$362,621 per year as compared to taxes generated by existing site conditions. The proiect will significantly increase taxes generated by the site, as well as increase tax revenues allotted to each taxing jurisdiction. 54 • TABLE 3-7 ANTICIPATED TAX REVENUE Jurisdiction Tax Rate Taxes Paid Future Taxes Tax Change $/$100 assessed School District-Mattituck 682.26 $7,982.44 $241.814.35 $233,831.91 Cwt cho e Uibraa District-Cutcho e 62.984 $736.91 22 323.43 $21,586.52 County Tax 15.953 JM6.65 $5,654.24 5 467.59 Town Tax 194.478 12,275.40 $68,929.35 $66,653.95 NYS Real Property Tax 9.859 $115.35 3494.33 -$3,378.98 Cutchogue Fire District 74.02 $866.03 J2623490 1ZLY68.87 Waste Water District 1.88 2.20 66.65 jk4.45 Solid Waste District 12.29 JZN4.00 6 482.76 6 268.76 TOTAL 1,053.724 $12,378.98 375 000.00 $362,621.02 Police To date, a response has not been received from the Southold Police Department However, due to the size and residential nature of the proposed development as compared to the Department's overall service area, the addition of 139 residential age restricted units is not anticipated to result in a significant impact to the Department The proposed project will have a gated entry restricting access and units will have individual security • systems. Fire To date, a response has not been received from the Cutchogue Fire District Each home will have fire and smoke alarm systems connected to a central station. In addition, an alarm panel will be located in the security booth which will identify a unit with a fire emergency. Hydrants are proposed throughout the development to aid fire responders Again, due to the size and residential nature of the proposed development as compared to the District's overall service area, the addition of 139 residential age restricted units is not anticipated to result in a significant impact fire response services School District To date, a response has not been received from the Mattictuck-Cutchogue Union Free School District. As the entirety of the proposed development will consist of ag_e restricted units which are not expected to generate any school aged children no significant adverse impacts are expected as a result of the proposed project It should be noted that a tax sumlus of approximately$233,832 (Table 3-7) is expected to be provided to the school district as a result of the lack of school aged children from the proposed project. Utilities A letter in response to our queries to LIPA/National Grid is located in Appendix H • LIPA/National Grid indicated electric and natural gas would be available to the site and has provided a cost estimate for the proposed development which is provided in Appendix H. SCWA indicated that they could fulfill the needs of the site but could not 55 issue a letter of water availability until the proposed project has received site plan approval (see Appendix H). It is anticipated that this project will have no significant • adverse impact on the utilities of the area. 3.3.3 Mitigation Measures It is anticipated that this site will not impact the community in any negative capacity. Taxes generated from the proposed development will serve to offset the costs to the service providers as a result of the proposed development. As the proposed project consists of a 55 or older adult community it is unlikely that there will be any significant adverse impact on the school district. Tax revenues generated from the proposed development will provide a surplus to the school district. Also, the facility will have all state of the art fire facilities that will aid in all fire fighting needs of the local volunteer fire departments. The site has been designed with two emergency access points along the west side of the property as well as the main entrance. There are no dead ends in the site that could create an area that will not be able to be accessed or areas that equipment will get stuck or need to back-up. Adherence to the NYS Fire and Building Codes will increase the level of safety from fires and minimize the potential for use of ambulance services. As this is a community of older citizens and a gated community there is not expected to be any need for an increase in the local police force. It is anticipated that energy-conserving measures including energy saving wall insulations, triple-glazed windows and energy efficient mechanical systems will be utilized, thereby mitigating the anticipated increase in energy consumption. 3.4 Aesthetic Resources, Open Space/Community Character and Public Health 3.4.1 Existing Conditions As stated in Section 1.3.5 this site is a fallow farm field established in successional vegetation; however, no mature trees exist on theproperty, which has been fallow for g > approximately 25 years. Though it could be considered Open Space, this site has never been designated by the County as a potential property for purchase. The zoning of this is residential which is consistent with the surrounding areas residential 1-acre property g � properties to the west and greater than 2-acre parcels to the north and the east). The area to the east is zoned R-80 and thus will not be able to be developed the same as the project site. The project site will conform to the general feel of the area with its eclectic collection of residential architecture maintaining the size and height of the buildings so that they do not exceed the average size and height of the buildings in the area. According to the pesticide report in Appendix D, this site is contaminated with arsenic and mercury. This means that any project at this site will need to clean up the site and in turn protect the groundwater and the neighboring wells from any further contamination. The applicant is anticipating an approximately 12-18 month approval process, followed by posting of bonds, letting of construction contracts and a construction period of 18-24 • months. As a result, the general time frame for staging and completion of the proposed 56 project is in the range of 2 to 3 years. The project will be developed in three phases, as • required by the Town. The construction phase is anticipated to progress in a manner typical for a project of the size and type proposed; no unique or unusual construction difficulties are anticipated. Impacts during the construction phase are commonly expected and are identified and discussed herein. As detailed below, these impacts are temporary in nature, and will be variable throughout the construction period. Construction activities will not occur outside weekday daytime hours (7 a.m. to 5 p.m.), and will conform to applicable Town regulations regarding construction noise generation and hours. The first phase of construction will include clearing, grubbing, grading, erosion control and soil management work. This will include building and planting of the proposed berms, which will provide screening of construction activities from the adjacent residential uses. The entire site will be cleared which will be subject to erosion during the construction phase, and will be the areas from which dust could arise, due to truck and equipment movement and winds. Following completion of clearing activities, survey of road alignment and vertical control will be completed to establish road installation and proper grades. The grading concept will involve use of material excavated elsewhere within the site to raise the grade in limited fill areas. The remainder of the property is relatively flat and foundation excavated material will be used to contour the land for proper drainage around buildings. • The boundaries of the construction area will be lined with silt fence and staked haybales, and drainage inlets will be protected by soil traps. It is anticipated that all construction equipment, materials and vehicles will be staged, parked and loaded/unloaded within the site. The intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street will be used for all construction access associated with the proposed project. Due to the proposed net export of material, it is proposed to reuse as much of this material on-site as practicable, in order to minimize the volume of material to be removed from the site (and the number of truck trips necessary to remove it). Generally, the site will be constructed starting on the southeastern portion of the property and progress west. The model homes, community building and approximately 30 homes will be started and completed during this first phase of construction, including the utilities and landscaping for these areas. The model homes will be built on the first loop of the road directly behind the community building. A sales office (trailer) for the project will also be set up at this time and will be located in the community building parking area and then relocating to the model homes once completed. The construction field office will also be located in this same area and relocated into the site as construction progresses to the west. Similarly, employee parking, staging and equipment storage areas will also be moved periodically as construction progresses into the site. The building materials for each home will be stored at the home site as needed and the pre-cast catch basins and piping will be staged along the roadway and in the area of the leaching fields and pond areas where most of this material will be used. • The complete infrastructure will be developed in this phase including all underground utilities and internal roadways completed less the paving portion, which will be installed 57 as sections are completed. The balance of the homes in this phase will commence with excavation for foundations, concrete, framing, interior work and finishes until complete • including all utility connections, final street paving and final landscaping. Phase 2 will involve the construction of the units in the central portion of the site, and Phase 3 will complete the remaining units in the western portion of the site using the same sequence for construction activities as described above. Any outstanding/remaining items will be completed in Phase 3 along with any landscaping issues that may arise. All street stormwater basins and silt separators will be checked again and cleaned out as necessary prior to the completion of construction activities. As construction equipment loading/unloading, materials storage, and construction staging areas and construction worker parking will be located within the site, no significant or long-term construction impacts to the surrounding residences are anticipated. Installation of a construction access/exit at Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street will minimize potential significant adverse impacts on the residences along Highland Road and Bridle Lane. Erosion control measures will be implemented during construction of the proposed project in order to minimize significant adverse impacts. In accordance with the NYSDEC Phase II SPDES Program, coverage under the General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities (NYSDEC Permit No. GP-0-08-001, General Permit)will be obtained prior to the initiation of construction activities. Prior to filing for coverage under the General Permit, the NYSDEC requires that a Stonmwater Pollution • Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be prepared for the parcel, including a detailed erosion and sediment control plan, to manage stormwater generated on-site during construction activities, and for post-construction stormwater management. An SWPPP will be prepared to ensure compliance with water quality and quantity requirements pursuant to Technical Guidance and GP-0-08-001 requirements. In addition, an Erosion Control Plan incorporating the NYSDEC Technical Guidance manual, and use of measures such as silt fencing, storm drain inlet protection, hay bales, and good housekeeping procedures will be utilized. The drainage system and revegetation plan will further provide permanent stormwater controls once construction is completed. Development of the property is not anticipated to significantly increase erosion/sedimentation or stormwater impacts, as a result of proper site grading procedures, erosion controls, and drainage system design. The Notice of Intent (NOI) requesting coverage under the General Permit will be filed in accordance with NYSDEC requirements, prior to the initiation of construction activities at the subject property. 3.4.2 Anticipated Impacts As shown above, this project will have both positive and negative impacts on the Aesthetic resources, Open Space/Community Character and Public Health. As stated, this space as it is today could be considered open space. However, the property has not been slated by the County for purchase. While the proposed project would result in a • decrease in open space for the surrounding area, the proposed project will be in keeping with the current neighborhood, maintaining the zoning and the look of the area. It is 58 a. • K I hC rF � a 4; t„ s� a . qqq a Y ! o•o � �sr /`. ��'•+ry . �F \ \\ "�.." ,ars . ... } noted that several multifamily projects presently exist within the Town's hamlet centers • Appendix C-3 provides aerial photographs and ground photographs of several of these multifamily projects to demonstrate how multifamily projects integrate into the visual character of the community. It is noted that hamlet centers with similar components (specifically AHD-1, AHD-2 AHD-3 and HD-5) to that of the proposed project have a suburban quality, similar to that of the existing neighborhoods within the Town Use of classic architectural elements and high quality building materials will assist in integrating the project with the surrounding community. The visual qualities of a site in relation to its surroundings are a major contributor in defining the character of a community. The height, bulk and architectural treatment of buildings and their relative visibility within an overall landscape setting are also significant components of community character. To demonstrate these features of the proposed development architectural renderings and a three dimensional to scale model of the proposed project have been prepared and are provided in Appendix C-2. The three dimensional computer simulations were prepared by a three dimensional 3D computer modeling and renderine specialist John DeFazio These views were prepared by first developing a computer 3D model of the existing terrain and roadways from the specific site topographic surveys prepared by N&P These 3D models were augmented to show the proposed site improvements pursuant to the proposed site plan and building elevations (provided in Plate 1 and Appendix C-1) illustrating the building footprint massing height and overall appearance of the proposed improvements The on-site improvements and off-site conditions were created to-scale and in their proper locations • using a 3D simulation program called SketchUprM The resulting 3D computer model is an accurate "virtual reality" representation of the proposed conditions allowing the user to obtain views of the proposed conditions from any position and angle and ensuring that the scale, height and perspective of the proposed new buildings are accurately portray The modeled views of the proposed project were created from five locations surrounding the project site. The locations from which the photosimulations were created are depicted in Figure 3-1 and described below. The views were chosen to provide a representation of how the proposed project would look to passersby traveling on adjacent roads and from within the existinp neighborhood. Location 1 is located on Depot Road north of the site southeast of the Depot Road's intersection with Evergreen Drive. Currently, a farm (planted with grape vines) dominates the foreground views from this location with deciduous wooded areas buffering the existing residential areas northwest or the subject site From this location minimal views of the subject property are visible Under proposed conditions views to the subject property will remain limited from this location A three foot berm planted with evergreens is proposed along the northeastern and northwestern property boundary which will screen the majority of the proposed dwellings Given the distance from this location to the subject site only the very top portions of the proposed units are expected to be visible from Location 1. • Location 2 is also located on Depot Road east of the subject property, approximatel 5,000 feet southeast of Location 1. Similar to Location 1 this view is mainly of an existing farm in the foreground, with the wooded portion of the subject property visible 59 in the background As a greater portion of the subject site is visible from this location the proposed development will be more visible from this location. The units and • rooflines will be visible from Location 2. It is noted that the proposed units are set back approximately 700 feet from Depot Road• therefore the distance to the proposed project diminishes its appearance from this location. Location 3 is located on S.R. 25 at its intersection with Griffing Street looking northwest towards the subject site. Currently Griffing Street and portions of existing structures along Griffing Street are visible in the foreground, with the wooded areas on the east and west sides of Griffing Street located in the background. The subject property is located at the terminus of Griffing Street but barely visible from this location. As Location 3 is more than 1,000 feet from the subiect property boundary, the impact to views from this location is limited. The existing wooded area at the terminus of Griffing Street will be removed and a proposed roadway connecting Griffing Street to Spur Road will be constructed. The limited views to the subject property from this location are expected to be screened by the street trees proposed along the roadway connection and surrounding the tennis court (which is in the line of sight from this view); therefore minimal visual impacts are anticipated to Location 3. Location 4 is located at the terminus of Griffing Street, looking northwest towards the subject site Under existing conditions, the existing vegetation along the property perimeter screens views into the subject property at this location. Under future conditions this view will be significantly changed as the existing vegetation will be removed and the proposed roadway connecting Griffing Street to Spur Road will be • constructed. As discussed above street trees and screening vegetation surrounding the proposed tennis court will provide screening of the subject property from this location, however the upper portions of the proposed community building and the proposed residential units in the distance will be visible from this location. Location 5 is located at the terminus of Spur Road, looking towards the subject site. Three views into the property are considered and were modeled to provide future conditions views: one looking north into the subject property along the rear of the proposed units; one looking northeast looking towards the central portion of the proposed development and one looking southeast along the proposed connection road. Under existing conditions much of the interior of the subject site is visible from this location. Therefore under future post development conditions, it is expected that subject property will continue to be visible from this location. The view looking towards the north will be substantially screened as a result of the proposed berm and its associated evergreen plantings. However, the upper portions of the proposed units are anticipated to be visible from this location. The view northeast into the central portion of the proposed development will be significantly changed from existing conditions. The units on the southwestern portion of the site and the interior roadways and parking area will be visible from this location. The building materials and architectural style of the units that will be visible from this location is depicted in the architectural models provided in Appendix C- 2 The view to the southeast from Location 5 will also be significantly changed from the existing condition. The view under proposed conditions will be of the connecting • roadway to Griffing Street a building containing affordable housing units, and the proposed project's main entrance and community building in the distance. Views into the 60 property along the internal roadway will be partially screened by the proposed street • trees' however this view will that of a residential neighborhood rather than the existing successional field viewed under existing conditions. The architectural renderings and three dimensional model simulations provided in Appendix C-2 have been prepared in order to provide a representation of architectural styles building_ materials and character of the development from the interior portions of the site The applicant has designed the project with high quality architecture and landscaping throughout the site in order to provide an attractive community that may be integrated with the surrounding community character. As shown in Plate 2, with the use of plantings and in particular the proposed berm planted with evergreen trees along the northern and western portions of the property, the views of the proposed development will be largely screened from the existing residential areas to the north and west. Over a period of 8 years, the vegetation will mature and screen more and more of the new development. This growth is anticipated to eventually screen all but the roofs of the new homes. According to the project architect, the plantings will be 6 to 8 feet tall when planted. Add this height to the height of the berm and the vegetated berms top will be approximately 10 to 12 foot high. After 3 to 4 years the plantings will be approximately 14 to 16 ft high and after 8 years approximately 20 to 22 feet high. With the height of the proposed homes at 24 to 26 foot high the neighboring properties will have a limited view of the houses. Also, this project will need to remove contaminants from the soils that are leftover from the days of agricultural use at the site. This cleanup will protect the neighbors from continued exposure to these chemicals in their drinking water and in the soils around the site. Due to the construction work in general, there will be some short-term impacts on the area. These will consist of construction noise, dust, excess truck traffic from the delivery of products for construction and the equipment itself. As said, these though will be short term and once construction is finished these will dissipate. 3.4.3 Mitigation Measures The above discussion shows that there will be several minor impacts to the site due to the project. As shown in the landscape plan the project will utilize plantings to try and soften the effect of a housing community in this area. In terms of open space the project will maintain several areas throughout the site that will be green space or ponds. Finally this project will be utilizing and cleaning up a site that due to past agricultural practices could be a problem to the residents in the area. Cleanup of the site will stop the influx of contaminants into groundwater and into the wells of the neighboring community, thus protecting the neighbors from further exposure. As for the construction impacts, all work will take place in the daylight hours to minimize noise impacts on the neighborhood, dust control measures will be taken in case of excess dust from the site. Also, as with the construction noise, truck traffic will be limited to the normal working hours to minimize any significant adverse impacts to the local residents. • Plantings, as stated above, will create a buffer around the site virtually hiding all but the rooflines of the new houses. This will be a two fold mitigation measure, in that the new planting will not only lower the impact of the new development on the eye of the 61 neighbors but will also be completely constructed of naturalized plantings which will be stronger and rely on less irrigation and other plant care that an invasive plant will require. • Another major concern around a construction site is the safety of the families that are living near the site. As stated all of the truck traffic will be limited to the daylight hours to provide the visibility to both the truckers and the neighbors to avoid any vehicle to vehicle or vehicle pedestrian accidents. The site will be fenced to protect from anyone entering the site and either falling into holes or tripping over any construction debris or equipment. Also, open holes will be fenced to protect against anyone falling into. Lastly, all construction material will be removed or stored properly to protect against anyone injuring himself or herself on construction debris that has been handled improperly. 3.5 Cultural Resources 3.5.1 Existing Conditions The following discussion of cultural resources is excerpted from the Cultural Resource Assessment prepared by TRACKER Archaeology Services, Inc., dated October 2007 (see Appendix G). Introduction Between August 8 and September 20 2007, TRACKER Archaeology Services, Inc. conducted a • Phase IA documentary study and Phase IB archaeological survey for the proposed Heritage at Cutchogue subdivision in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The purpose of the documentary study was to determine the prehistoric and historic potential of the project area for the recovery of archaeological remains. This was implemented by a review of the original and current environmental data, archaeological site files, other archival literature, maps, documents and informant interviews. A prehistoric and historic site file search was conducted utilizing the resources of the New York State Historic Preservation Office (NYSHPO) in Waterford, New York. Various historic web sites may have been visited to review any pertinent site information. Prehistoric Potential Assessing the known environmental and prehistoric data, we can summarize the following points: • The project area is about 2,900 feet northeast of Downs Creek, 3180 feet north of West Creek, and 3270 feet northwest of Wickham Creek, all tidal inlets flowing south into Peconic Bay • The project area is mainly comprised of level,well-drained topography. • The project parcel is located on a peninsula. Previous archaeological investigations have shown these areas as more desirable for prehistoric occupation. • Prehistoric sites are near the study area. • Indian trails were located in the vicinity. • 62 Therefore in the opinion of TRACKER Archaeology Services,Inc., the study area has higher than • average potential for the recovery of archaeological remains. The type of site encountered could be a small processing/procurement site. Historic Potential Assessing the known historical data, the following points can be summarized: • A Contact period wigwam is situated in the vicinity. • No map documented any structures on or adjacent to the project area. A historic Native American site was reported in the vicinity. Therefore in the opinion of TRACKER Archaeology Services, Inc., the study area has a moderate potential for the recovery of historic sites. The type of site encountered might be a Contact Period site. There will be low potential for European-American sites. Field Methods Walkover-Reconnaissance Exposed ground surfaces were walked over at approximately 3 to 5 meter intervals to observe for artifacts. Covered ground terrain was also reconnoitered at 15 meter intervals for any above ground features, such as berms, depressions, or rock configurations which might be evidence of a prehistoric of historic site. Photographs were taken of the study area. Shovel Testine Shovel testing was conducted at 15-meter intervals across the project parcel. Each shovel test pit measured about 30 to 40 cm in diameter and was dug into the underlying B horizon (subsoil) 10 • to 20 cm or more when possible. All soils were screened through '/<-inch wire mesh and observed for artifacts. Each shovel test pit was flagged in the field. Positive shovel tests were doubled- flagged. All shovel test pits were mapped on the project area map at this time. Soil stratigraphy was recorded according to texture and color. Soil color was matched against the Munsell color chart for soils. Notes were transcribed on pre-printed field forms and in a notebook. Field Results Field-testing of the project area included the excavation of 767 shovel tests (ST's) across the project area. One prehistoric quartz pint tip and 1 quartz flake were recovered in St's 242 and 171 respectively. Eight radials were excavated at 1 and 3-meter intervals along the 4 cardinal directions from the positive ST's. Results were negative showing these to be an isolated fmds. Scattered eighteenth to nineteenth century artifacts from the plow zone included 1 blue transferprint whiteware from ST 43, 1 blue decorated creamware from ST 121, 1 lead glaze earthenware from ST 131, 2 Jackfield-like ceramic from ST 132, 6 flower pot fragments from ST 172, I brown transferprint whiteware from ST 204, and I olive green bottle glass and I undecorated whiteware from ST 230. 3.5.2 Potential Impacts • The Phase I Archaeological Investigation prepared for the project made the following conclusions and recommendations (see Appendix G): 63 The Phase IA had determined the study area had higher than average potential for the recovery of prehistoric sites. The property had a moderate potential for Native American historic sites but a • low potential for European-American sites. The Phase IB resulted in the excavation of 767 ST's. Isolated prehistoric and historic fmds were encountered. The prehistoric finds were too few in number and too disconnected to warrant further assessment. The historical finds were also few in numbers and were found in the plow zone area, an area that may have been disturbed by agricultural activity. Any agricultural activity will disarrange the original stratigraphy of the area, rendering the chronology inaccurate. No further work is therefore recommended. 3.5.3 Mitigation As no significant adverse impacts to cultural resources will occur(no such resources are present, as determined by the Phase I Archaeological Investigation prepared for the project site) and no further archaeological investigation is recommended, no mitigation measures are necessary or proposed. • 64 4.0 OTHER REQUIRED SECTIONS • 4.1 Cumulative Impacts Impacts of the proposed project, in conjunction with those of other pending or current development applications, were considered for the area. The Town Planning Board was contacted in 2005 to obtain records of other proposed projects in the vicinity, and indicated that no other projects were proposed at that time. The Town has since been contacted in 2007, and identified one project being planned in the immediate area. The project is a 4-lot division of B' (Business) zoned land into approximately four, 1-acre lots. Access is planned to be from Griffing Street just south of the Post Office and Schoolhouse Lane east of Griffing Street. Details of the future development plan for the four subdivided lots are not known at this time; however, the potential cumulative impacts of the development of the four lots when considered together with those of the proposed project may include: • Increase in the demand upon local community services (e.g., fire and police protection, utilities, and solid waste handling), these services will receive an increase in funds from the tax revenues generated from the developments, which will enable these service providers to continue to have sufficient capability to provide services. • The projects (including the subject site) will change the use and appearance of their sites and there will be a cumulative impact on the visual resources and character of the community. However, since the proposed project will occupy the largest of these sites, the impacts to area • visual resources and community character are anticipated to arise primarily from this project, which are analyzed in Section 3.4.1. • On-site sanitary systems conforming to Article 6 of the SCSC are proposed by the Heritage at Cutchogue project. Similarly, any future development of the business zoned lots will be required to conform to the requirements of Article 6 (specifically, no more than 600 gallons of sanitary wastewater may be discharged per acre on a daily basis). Therefore, the potential development of the four additional lots is not expected to cause a significant increase in sanitary flow or elevated levels of nitrogen in recharge above NYS drinking water standards. • An increase in traffic generated by the combined projects will be anticipated; however the No Build Condition traffic volumes consist of the existing volumes adjusted by an annual growth factor is to account for increases in population as well as proposed developments within the vicinity of the site. The proposed project and the potential subdivision for business lots within the Hamlet Center are consistent with the pattern of development recommended by the Hamlet Study. In general, significant adverse impacts are not anticipated from these projects. The proposed project and the potential subdivision for business lots within the Hamlet Center are consistent with the pattern of development recommended by the Hamlet Study. The two site access points are adequately separated to avoid conflicts and once the future uses of these lots is determined, site plan applications will be filed and site plan review conducted by the Town. It is noted that a 30 foot setback is provided along the north/northeastern portion of property to provide buffering should future development • occur on the adjacent residentially zoned property to the north/northeast. Sidewalks are also proposed throughout the community, leading out to Spur Road and the property boundary in the vicinity of Griffing Street and School House Lane to encourage and 65 provide the ability for residents to walk to the Hamlet Center, thereby possibly reducing vehicular trips. Future development of the commercial subdivision and adjacent vacant • parcel will benefit from public water being extended by the applicant as described in Section 1.3.4. No other specific mitigation measures have been provided on the applicant's site plan in conjunction with the future four lot commercial subdivision as significant adverse impacts are not anticipated from these projects and the future use of these parcels has not yet been determined. 4.1.1 Effects on the Use and Conservation of Energy Resources An increase in the consumption of energy resources would typically be expected from the intensification of land use on a site. The applicant intends to construct the units utilizing the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) building guidelines and principles in the proposed construction project. Specifically, energy-efficient building materials and mechanical systems will be utilized for units including: all appliances and mechanical systems (e.g., air conditioners, heating systems, heating/ventilation/air conditioning systems, heat pumps, etc.) will be Energy Star rated, low flow fixtures and low voltage lighting, windows with Low-E coated glass, spray foam insulation (R-21 installation rating) and use of tankless water heaters which significantly reduce energy requirements in residential housing. As discussed in Section 1.3.5, the proposed Lighting Plan has been designed to be "dark sky,, compliant and utilizes energy efficient lighting fixtures (specifically, high pressure sodium lamps). Shade trees will also be used in proximity to many of the units to provide shade and reduce cooling needs in summer months. It is expected that existing public utilities at the site will be more than adequate to meet the expected demand. During more detail site plan development of the project, additional LEED principles, including building orientation, will be evaluated and incorporated into the site plan for the site. There will be an increase in energy use during the construction phase of the proposed project. These impacts are expected to be of short duration, and the long-term energy demand is expected to remain stable or decline. The proposed project will utilize energy efficient design standards to minimize energy consumption at the site. The buildings will be constructed in conformance with New York State and Town building codes, which require adequate insulation as well as other design standards that will minimize energy use. Water-saving plumbing fixtures can be specified for the proposed buildings in accordance with current building requirements and practice of the trade. Installation of low-flow toilets, showers, sinks and equipment will reduce unnecessary water loss, which will translate into conservation of the energy resources required to heat this water. In summary, it is not anticipated that the project will result in significant adverse impacts on energy resources. 4.2 Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided The residential subject parcel has only minor adverse impact areas. No rare, threatened • or endangered floral or faunal species have been observed, and none are anticipated because of the previous agricultural use of the property. Existing vegetation consists 66 mostly of grasses and there are no surface bodies of water on or near the site. No • unsuitable organic soils were found, nothing of historical interest is present, and no noise or air quality problems exist. The terrain can generally be described as rolling with few steep slopes. Water supply will be provided by the Suffolk County Water Authority and sanitary waste will be disposed of using a standard septic/leaching system. As with any type of development, there will be a loss of open sace. Land use plans have been developed for the Town of Southold and the County of Suffolk and both have established tracts of land within their jurisdiction to be used as open space. The subject parcel is not included in any proposed open space areas and has, in fact, been zoned for residential use. This project as stated will create the loss of approximately 46 acres of agricultural soils. However this site has not been fanned in over 20 years and is not slated to be protected under the farmland preservation. Another unavoidable adverse impact is the addition of nitrogen to the groundwater. As detailed in the previous section on groundwater impacts, the estimated nitrate concentration in recharge groundwater for the proposed project is 6.3 mg/l. If the site were used for agricultural purposes, Cornell University in its land use and Groundwater quality in the Pine Barrens, study states that 9.96 mg/1 could be expected. If the site were used as a nursery, nitrogen numbers upwards of 13.20 mg/1 could be expected. Therefore, while use of this site for residential purposes will impact nitrogen concentrations in the groundwater, this impact is less than the impact to be to be expected if the site were used for agricultural purposes. Also use of the site for agricultural • purposes will also contribute pesticides and herbicides to the groundwater in much larger quantities than will be expected from a residential establishment. This project will require both long term and short-term expenditures of various kinds of energy. In the short term, construction activities will require a large consumption of energy. This will include electricity, and various fuels for the operating of tools and machinery (i.e. fuel consumption of heavy equipment for the grading of the site). The long-term energy consumption will be the use of electricity and fuels in the normal use of the homes. The design and construction of the buildings will take into consideration the latest advances in fuel-efficient buildings. Use of high quality insulation and double or triple glazed windows will all help to maximize the reduction in energy consumption. 4.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources The proposed project does not involve simply a short-term use of committed resources. Wood, steel, concrete and glass building structures can be expected to last 100 years or more and can even be rebuilt on the same site. Prior to undertaking revegetation, the applicant will remove all plants on the property which are considered invasive by the New York State Invasive Plant Council. After all the invasives are removed, the landscaping plans will be implemented. No species • considered invasive will be utilized and all plants will be native or acceptably naturalized species. 67 Development of this project will irreversibly and irretrievably commit the short-term use • of various resources during the construction process. These include the use of electricity for operating tools and machinery and for lighting; the use of gas, oil and diesel fuels for operating machinery and construction equipment and for the delivery of the construction materials; and the human resources of manpower for the construction itself. Long-term commitment of building materials including wood, concrete, steel, glass, and others, will be necessary for the development of the project. The quantity of these materials and energy committed will be in keeping with those used for the development of high quality residences. 4.4 Growth Inducing Aspects Population Construction of this project will result in a small percentage growth of the population of Southold. These projected increases are due in whole to the construction of new housing. There could also be a secondary increase in population due to the result of new businesses coming into the community to service the newly increased population and an increase in older businesses that may need to expand to accommodate the larger population. This secondary increase is expected to be insignificant compared to that of the new construction. Support Facilities It is anticipated that the significant adverse impacts to the community service will be • minimum. The existing police, fire and health care as well as the school facilities are adequate to handle the new population. However, area retail stores such as grocery, clothing, or service oriented businesses such as haircutting, dry cleaning and automotive may feel the need to expand and thereby need to hire new personnel. This could indirectly lead to an additional population increase above that of the new community. Development Potential Construction of the proposed project will not lead to further growth in the area as all will be on the site and no improvements are planned for the existing roads or projects P P g utilities in the area. • 68 5.0 ALTERNATIVES • SEQRA requires the investigation of reasonable alternatives to a proposed project in order to determine the merits of the project as compared to other possible uses on the subject site, in consideration of the goals and capabilities of the applicant as well as realistic circumstances of the situation. The discussion and analysis of each alternative should be conducted at a level of detail sufficient to allow for the comparison of various impact categories by the decision-making agencies. The following lists the alternatives analyzed in this document: Alternative 1: No Action(The site remains in its current use and condition.) Alternative 2: Clustered Alternative (This alternative is based on a clustering of the proposed units to create substantial open space and to maximize the ability to provide vegetated perimeter buffering.) Alternative 3: Decreased Number of Units (This alternative decreases the number of housing units from the allowable yield in order to reduce or eliminate impacts from the proposed project.) Alternative 4: Public Acquisition (The site is acquired by the Town and remains as open space in its current condition). Alternative 5: Alternative Design for Wastewater (This alternative discusses the use of a sewage treatment plant for the proposed project in lieu of individual septic systems.) • It should be noted that the existing natural and human environmental resource conditions are described in detail in Sections 2.0 and 3.0 and these sections can be referred to for current site conditions. Table 5-1 provides a comparison of the coverage and physical characteristics of the subject site for each alternative as well as for the proposed conditions. • 69 'TABLE 5-1 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES Proposed Alternative Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 5 Parameter Project 1/4 Coverages acres): --- --- --- --- --- Roads/Parking/Buildings ±17.35 ±0.0 ±16.67 ±14.88 ±17.45 Recharge Pond ±4.6 ±0.0 ±1.77 ±0.11 ±4.6 Forest/Successional Field ±0.0 ±45.99 ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 Landscaping ±24.04 ±0.0 ±27.55 ±31.00 ±23.94 TOTAL ±45.99 ±45.99 ±45.99 ±45.99 ±45.99 Water Resources: --- --- --- --- --- Sanitary Wastewater(gpd)(i) ±21,615 0.0 ±20,850 ±38,265 ±21,615 Landscape Irrigation( d)(2) ±17,800 0.0 ±17,800 ±6,013 ±17,500 Total Water Use d ±39,415 0.0 ±38,650 ±44,278 ±39,115 Nitrogen Cone. (m /1)(3) 7.0 0.0 6.4 5.0 4.4 Miscellaneous: --- --- O en S ace ±10.56 ±0.0 ±11.46 ±0.0 ±10.56 Solid Waste(lbs/day)(4) ±1,711 0.0 ±1,711 ±2,172 ±1,711 Residents(capita)(s) ±271 0.0 ±271 +419 ±271 School-age Children(capita) 0 (6) 0 0 107 (5) 0 (6) Total Taxes ($/year) ±_375,000.00 ±_12,378.98 /0 ±_375,000.00 ±348,022.00 ±_375,000.00 School District Taxes (Vyear) +241,800 8,719,35 /0 +241,800 -1,510,386 +241,800 Notes: (1) Assuming SCDHS design flow rates of 150 gpd/unit plus 0.30 gpd/SF for 1,000 SF gym area, plus 0.06 gpd/SF for 1,500 SF of community building office/meeting area, plus 5 gpd/bather for 75 bathers in indoor&outdoor pool. (2) Assuming 5.5 inches/year for fertilizer dependent areas. Assumes irrigation period of 4 months(mid May to mid September). (3) See Appendix F-2 throueh F-6. (4) Assuming 5 lbs/day/capita+ 116/day per bedroom(US Census),and 0.5 lbs/day/capita for community building and gym(assumes occupancy of 25 people/day)(Salvato, 1982). (5) Assuming 2 capita/age-restricted unit(2 and 3 bedroom units), 1.5 capital bedroom age-restricted unit, 3.67 capita/4 bedroom non age-restricted unit,2.95 capita/3 bedroom non age-restricted unit,2.54 capita/1 bedroom non age-restricted unit, 1.05 children/4 bedroom non age-restricted unit,0.58 children/3 bedroom non age-restricted unit,0.36 children/I bedroom non age-restricted unit(US Census). (6) No school aged children are expected as the units are age restricted. 0 70 0 0 • xw]YaYYe]v wa.Fwexry I © �O° [zrArE 4 sxrnn wYxcxrsY�. —I — /rtgel YnrXwa�M 1901.44 (DEM) Da 190Ae5'(ACNAL) OI TI 5]510'50-E(O®J N Sb'1�]0-E ANAL) YA xMMA z g SF�AC �'osJ)na'w'E a)AXM Aa]sMIYZY.v Tut r-aAe4 U-r N UI TAI OI]PICMO A aM¢ 2 I s eux mWYYwhe - Ms4Ie )aa' vYI Ss¢/wMIA]L v[arxmn ww wM-rEAn,]M ovoma W�r,nr< `^`Xs GRIFRNG STREET �� u n rM I • erg' rtr]rvenar v 4. r LLL___ i e IMw/P�ArXcs eea ^� ' wy NYruzrA nmrnnr+]i.wac+r+ec Yizwz%IUYr = :.0 ze eJ Im . r sJnsm(orm] D ET 0 ET W IM rvJrIJ'w-w TIT W. v «� ra x.°.mm uv.Yrc ^ : $ EIL cl ID ET AD E�T ET c OC 9/le]MNCYYI05 IT g ,IG IJ) • N N ;Awl — — s _ =F23 2OOt.51'(DEFO) p y KrY.e l.wl nM]iphlgLr a bY]wmur a noArFolrwr v ]009.]2'(ACNAL) Iea�i.CiS A�%0 ms onb. °'nM.�••o m�ii�i°f "I]ovioav°r Nw ww: PYt �ivn]. s�sLw�x Yrlcx. v-•.tea Xv.-�_- •YOeYO Ar. z l Y OYEIA Y I w •y I srNttr x nrtr x I I TYPICAL _y .LOYIM X° aO1uri,o •wet c � ,.Mw.svzn I CAL PL OT LAYOUT w m SITE DATA: x01F4 Iwlti tplh ABOfnIIK RESIDENTIAL UNIT wIAYw v ubs- II,(rKL I..sronuac) PARKING CALCULATIONS, VILLAGE aeKY.. oYincr t s AEIxYm GREEN OKVONIpI Yyllmlplx IME IY(e%GK/IA) Il W' I AW' I S%'IA% L2S 1 USM 1eED OM 91PKr N..NS qr"TIT.9.i.... MIOYrAt 9Y1iMY fR RO! 1%].]Ir.}1 S/N.MO 4/uxf.I%f6 K�?AIWLLYeiS: „ ]MyIQT P[M oYNMe PC o r ] I%IN.Af•]%TONT-]],S)).]5 tl9 M Iwls x a s'NtSMr -]s5 vKEs lal a Mrt eN,veo s .s-e x] . I]sPKss {]I]ual anW x s-sx]- I12 20NING DATA Tor PMxnc IE9LYEm p rM Mm. SKFS TYPICAL SECTION IQ TKt Pw Wv 4 a IYasAbXA rKNn SITE COVERAGE: xYIYeC,I[YYEr oo.Yn&nll r s sP.m rP mws rasa IFe HOZ ,er savours F uar mom oYEumcs: nm IIou4 e.e%4/JW -u sPKEs �� ]t].ao a IJJa Px�tD IEIe9 lglflr x WMR/.J•-% 9KF5 Ol.IMYS eRe].]F. AM MYII(SY RJB ].0%.]I I.]]sf-(o.,K) ]00.1CQI]m PMM4: /r] N11. ROVYGf B49N J)]IO 4F JHY ]leal YXns..MOW..Pn1tMYr n)Aas sY. 15JA a 1°i�"OEtn n %m.v In.WEIc Z. YICTYI,rows cwY.GSBV.A wm u,etl ss. Jln �r�rxlo ]I]m corwh mllw wM rLoaA elan v].aW ro x�000 4 �YW]IYP,W I.]OOJYJ ae. z.sn p sOE rXO(FEET) .e BJMM 1MG3Y®. MM YM,(Mo OEE1) .ss WMIE Raan Mu(SO.n Mxl X�''6W(�?M]) v SIX3E F/YLr Ki.Y1[0 ORM x SP.YZs PEe OQIAC X CM.Y.E WT CQfF'P (YI Y YiMOW£TAR 1 YKEs PEA-ITin pr sA[Lr P.VdnG dlxfMi MWII QQII ,Y s[[ppYTP<II}rK PlM6 GRAPHIC SCALE '"�eE e'er ] In s¢]Ao,rtcnYK XArrs Iu WaYxYX] ¢S/ ¢ (I(I . .1 _ TKYs.] - It Teas ALTEPWATE STYE PLAN rAwY" orK P.Peabm - ]n sPKts TmE hEPffACE oeTw Yw a • mu"P"14i PMe r�] -],:PKEe ea��rK]�AW�r.P AT CUmmooE Mn I w Tar I Mwc rAVWm.A zrKEs Innew mwE wa.+om: eeAM CUBE oYW w. NOTEOWNER: APPLICANT: °nm w rlYx nv]M:M ersweeXr v eMYa MI ME aY ronor..wY X oww...•+••u0.Y Jlea .Town T xIL91.Pot wunlM]m Kmu]IMs M NOCRO. LTD. ME HERITAGE AT C LLC EAST WAIN 12xi-D NORTH ocEM AVENUE N L30N P L PE xJ w PeWaalm. RNERHEAD. NY I t601 IJEDEORD, NY 11]6] nm QgHEERB,9lNNEYORB nr snwauw wU..el'.uE wr mcs eub nxm o- .�.Xeare.. Figure 5-1 6 5.1 Alternatives l and 4: No Action/Public Acquisition • This alternative assumes that the proposed project is not built; the site remains in its current vacant and undeveloped condition. It is unreasonable to expect that any private entity will continue to own this property, pay property taxes, and leave it as is in perpetuity. Therefore, public acquisition for open space, recreational, or other public purposes is logically implied in the no action alternative. For analysis purposes, it assumed that the public entity that acquires the site will construct no improvements, and leave it as is. It should be noted that the applicant is amenable to having the property acquired, as long as the public agency is willing to purchase the property at a price based on the highest and best usage of the site. Under this alternative, the site will have the following environmental resource characteristics: Geology N The existing topography, drainage patterns, soils and subsoils, as described in Section 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 will remain unchanged. The site will retain the existing geologic resources. Water Resources N The site has natural qualities in terms of evapotranspiration and recharge, and currently has a nitrogen concentration in recharge of 2.0 mg/l. These conditions will remain unchanged. Ecology N The project will remain as habitat, but the existing trend towards noxious species invasion will continue unabated. Ultimately, the site will become an • invasive successional hardwood with a canopy of cherries and Black Locust, and an understory of Asiatic Bittersweet, Multiflora Rose and Garlic Mustard. Animal biodiversity will be low due to the invasive nature of the available habitat. Land Use, Zoning and Plans N The project will remain vacant and will not be consistent with the site's Hamlet Density residential zoning, which recognize the site for multiple family development. The site will remain compatible with surrounding uses; however will not provide affordable housing opportunities. Community Character N The existing visual character will remain unchanged; portions of the wooded frontage of the subject site will be visible, with little visual penetration into the site. Community Services N The site will not generate school aged children, but could be subject to unauthorized activity and vandalism requiring police or fire protection. Other than that, there will be minimal need for public services. No additional energy resources will be required. Transportation N The site will not require driveway access, and no vehicle trips will be generated. Cultural Resources N The site will retain its cultural resource characteristics, which • include no historic use, and no significant archaeological site potential given the Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment. 71 The use of the site for a mixed housing community is beneficial in that it provides for needed housing within the hamlet center as envisioned by the Town Planning initiatives • and the site's zoning designation. A summary of the benefits which will not be realized should the property remain vacant and underutilized is provided below: • The site will not fulfill a need for mixed-use housing (ownership) and affordable housing within the Town. • The site will not add a variety to housing opportunities that will allow citizens to homes and develop a sense of community. downsize, seek smaller less maintenance p Y In comparison to the proposed project, this alternative will not satisfy the goals of the Town, in that an appropriate land use in conformance to zoning will not be provided. 5.2 Alternative 2: Clustered Alternative This alternative involves the construction of 139 attached and detached age restricted units on the 45.99 acre property. As stated in the proposed project, the property is zoned HD or Hamlet Density, which permits 1 unit per 10,000 square feet with community water and sewer. A map of this alternative is shown in Figure 5-1 and also in Appendix A. This site will be serviced by public water and individual septic system. This alternative will include 139 units of which 125 units will be single family detached • units and 4 units will have a total of 14 multifamily dwellings that will be deemed as affordable housing. This site will also include a community center, pool and tennis court. The project will include the creation of landscaped areas, access roadways and a storm drainage system that will culminate in a recharge basin on southeast corner of the project. This Alternative is considered a cluster alternative due to approximately 60% of the site being preserved as landscaping. This is accomplished with the preservation of open space along the perimeter of the property. This space is a contiguous buffer area with a 50' buffer to the east, a 100 foot buffer to the west and a large common area to the north. Also there will be 8 interconnected blocks of open space grass areas or village greens located in every housing loop on the property. This alternative will utilize traditional old field successional grasslands in the revegetation of the site. The site will be accessed off a road constructed at the intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffrng Street. This road will create the center split of the site with loop roads extending off to access the houses. Sidewalks will follow the paths of the roads. Each house is located approximately 20 feet from the roadway. Each house will be serviced by an individual driveway or in the case of the affordable houses common parking areas. Emergency access points are proposed, one on the northwestern portion of the site and one on the southwestern portion of the site. Table 5-2 below provides a list of coverages • for the site compared to that of the proposed project and existing site. 72 An onsite drainage system is proposed for the southeastern portion of the property. This • basin will serve as the storm recharge site for the entire project. This basin has been designed to accommodate a 6 inch storm as required by the Town of Southold standards. As stated each home will be serviced by a sanitary system. Solid waste will be removed by private carters and a dumpster will be located at the community center. It is anticipated that this alternative as with the proposed project will require that the entire site be cleared. Grading will need to be necessary for the creation of the recharge basin and the building footprints of the buildings and for the proposed roadways. There will also be the need to grade the site to create swales and drainageways for the creation of the drainage system. It is proposed that the cut for the basements, footings, and drainage structures will cover the amount of fill needed for the grading operations creating, hopefully, an excess amount of fill and no need for any outside sources. In accordance with the town requirements all stormwater runoff from impervious areas will be retained on the site, and recharged into groundwater in the proposed recharge basin. This system is sized to maintain a six inch storm. The homeowners association will be responsible for the maintenance of all the stormwater drainage facilities, the roadways, and the common areas. This project will require a NYSDEC State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit for the stormwater system and the erosion control measures during the project. As shown on the alternative plan this site will have only 1 access for the residence. This • will be located on the south side of the project at the intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street. This access will be stop controlled and configured for all movement. There are two other entrances to the site that will be for emergency use only. These are at the end of Spur Drive and also at the end of Bridle Lane. These gates will be maintained with the use of crash gates. The main entrance road will enter the site on the south end and create a middle corridor of the site with horseshoe shaped roads extending off of this to access the homes. Sidewalks are proposed, in this alternative, to follow the roadway throughout the entire site. As per the town requirement for this site, 308 parking spaces are required. This alternative plan will provide 311 spots for the use of the community. 272 of these spots will be for the use of the individual homeowners or the parking areas of the affordable housing units, and 39 spots will be provided at the community center. Required parking for residential uses is 272 spaces based on 2 spaces per single family detached and attached dwelling units and 1.5 spaces per unit for affordable units. Additionally, one space per 300 SF of recreational facility uses (community building and pool) and five spaces per tennis court are required pursuant to Town parking requirements for a total of 36 spaces required for accessory recreational areas. One truck loading space is also required for a community center with a floor area of 5,000 to 25,000 SF. • Sanitary wastewater generated as a result of this alternative will be treated utilizing on- site septic systems, designed as gang systems (multiple unit systems). The details of the layout are similar to that of the proposed project plan located in Plate 4. Sanitary 73 calculations are found on the plan sheet for this alternative located in Plate 4. This form of disposal is acceptable, provided the projected wastewater design flow does not exceed • standards established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). Article 6 of the SCSC addresses sewage facility requirements for realty subdivisions, in order to limit the loading of nitrogen in various groundwater management zones as established by the SCDHS. As promulgated under Article 6, a Population Density Equivalent must be determined for the subject site in order to determine the type of sewage disposal system required for the type and size of this alternative. This equivalent (or total allowable flow) is then compared to the design sewage flow for the project. If the project's design sewage flow exceeds the Population Density Equivalent, a community sewage system or on-lot sewage treatment system is required. If the project's design sewage flow is less than the site's Population Density Equivalent, conventional septic systems may be used, provided individual systems comply with the current design standards and no community sewerage system is available or accessible. The project site is located within Groundwater Management Zone IV as defined by the SCDHS. Based on the requirements of Article 6, no more than 600 gallons of sanitary wastewater may be discharged per acre on a daily basis within this zone, provided public water supply is available. The project will utilize public water supply provided by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA). The acreage used for determining this Population Density Equivalent must not include wetlands, surface waters, or land in flood zones. The subject site is 45.99 acres in size (and does not require exclusion of underwater lands, wetlands or areas within flood zones), thus, the Population Density • Equivalent (total allowable flow) on the subject site is calculated as: 45.99 acres x 600 gpd/acre = 27,594 gallons per day (gpd) Based on SCDHS sanitary design flow factors, the anticipated sanitary wastewater generated by the site is as follows: The SCDHS sanitary design flow factors for senior residential units applied by the SCDHS is 150 gpd. Therefore, it is estimated that the 139 proposed residences will generate approximately 20,850 gpd of sewage flow. TABLE 5-2 TOTAL WASTEWATER GENERATION ALTERNATIVE 2 Description (Units/SF) SCDHS Design Flow Factor Total Wastewater 139 senior residences 150 gpd/unit 20,850 gpd 1,000 SF gym (community 0.30 gpd per SF 300 gpd center) 1,500 SF office (community 0.06 gpd per SF 90 gpd center) Pools (75 bathers) 5 gpd/bather 375 gpd • Total 21,615 gpd 74 As with the proposed project this alternative will have flows below that that is allowed by the SCDHS for this site. As shown on the alternative plan, SCDHS allows 22,537 gallons of sanitary waste for this site, and the alternative project will produce 20,115 gallons or 2,422 gallons less than what is allowed. No previous connections to SCWA water mains exist on site. It is assumed that in this alternative, water to be used for irrigation will be public water. The site is a fallow field with successional vegetation, mostly non-native species, with no mature trees. As with the proposed plan, this alternative will clear the entire site and replace the landscaping with lawn and with native plantings, this will encompass approximately 60 % of the property. This landscaping will involve the planting of the center medians of the roadways and the areas between and along the houses as well as a vegetated buffer area screening the site from that of the neighbors. The plantings for this plan will mimic that of the proposed plan as shown in the Landscape Plan in Plate 2. As stated all of the vegetation planted will be that of native species which will require less water and maintenance. The turf and the vegetation will require some care which will entail fertilization. This is estimated to be approximately 2.30 pounds of fertilizer per 1,000 SF of area. The irrigation is assumed to be approximately 5.5 inches from May to September. Lighting will be needed for the parking areas, roadways, and the exterior of the buildings. All lighting will be consistent with the town standards. • Recreational lighting will be located around the outdoor pool and the tennis courts. "Town code allows for recreational lighting to exceed the 14-foot maximum height, but requires the following two criteria: • All intensive recreational lighting shall be so located on the property with reference to surrounding properties that it shall be reasonably screened from view and compatible with the existing or potential use of neighboring properties. • No outdoor recreational facility, public or private, shall be illuminated after 11:00 p.m. except to conclude a recreational or sporting event or any other similar activity conducted at or in the facility,which was in progress under such illumination prior to 11:00 p.m. The proposed lighting for the tennis courts will be turned off at 9:00 P.M. so as to not impact the surrounding properties and to comply with Town code. Open space is not specifically provided for this alternative, open grass areas are located in the median of the roadways and some areas on the western edge of the property. The residents will be provided a common pool area, community center and tennis courts for recreational purposes and additional open space can be found in a nearby parks, including Goldsmiths Inlet Park and Bailie Beach Park which are within a 5 mile radius of the site. 'This alternative will, like that of the proposed project require approximately a 12-18 • month approval process, followed by posting of bonds, letting of construction contracts and a construction period of 18-24 months. As a result, the general time frame for staging and completion of this alternative will be in the range of 2 to 3 years. The project will be developed in three phases, as required by the Town. 75 The construction phase will most likely progress in a manner typical for a project of the • size and type proposed; no unique or unusual construction difficulties are anticipated. Impacts during the construction phase are commonly expected and are identified and discussed herein. As detailed below, these impacts are temporary in nature, and will be variable throughout the construction period. Construction activities will not occur outside weekday daytime hours (7 a.m. to 5 p.m.), and will conform to applicable Town regulations regarding construction noise generation and hours. The first phase of construction will include clearing, grubbing, grading, erosion control and soil management work. This will include building and planting of the proposed berms, which will provide screening of construction activities from the adjacent residential uses. The entire site will be cleared which will be subject to erosion during the construction phase, and will be the areas from which dust could arise, due to truck and equipment movement and winds. Following completion of clearing activities, survey of road alignment and vertical control will be completed to establish road installation and proper grades. The grading concept will involve use of material excavated elsewhere within the site to raise the grade in limited fill areas. The remainder of the property is relatively flat and foundation excavated material will be used to contour the land for proper drainage around buildings. The boundaries of the construction area will be lined with silt fence and staked haybales, and drainage inlets will be protected by soil traps. It is anticipated that all construction equipment, materials and vehicles will be staged, parked and loaded/unloaded within the • site. The intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street will be used for all construction access associated with the proposed project. Due to the proposed net export of material, it is proposed to reuse as much of this material on-site as practicable, in order to minimize the volume of material to be removed from the site (and the number of truck trips necessary to remove it). Generally, the sitewill be constructed starting on the southeastern portion of the property and progress west, much the same as the proposed project. The model homes, community building and approximately 30 homes will be started and completed during this first phase of construction, including the utilities and landscaping for these areas. The model homes will be built on the first loop of the road directly behind the community building. A sales office (trailer) for the project will also be set up at this time and will be located in the community building parking area and then relocating to the model homes once completed. The construction field office will also be located in this same area and relocated into the site as construction progresses to the west. Similarly, employee parking, staging and equipment storage areas will also be moved periodically as construction progresses into the site. The building materials for each home will be stored at the home site as needed and the re-cast catch basins and piping will be staged along the roadway and in the area of the leaching fields where most of this material will be used. The complete infrastructure will be developed in this phase including all underground • utilities and internal roadways completed less the paving portion, which will be installed as sections are completed. The balance of the homes in this phase will commence with 76 excavation for foundations, concrete, training, interior work and finishes until complete including all utility connections, final street paving and final landscaping. Phase 2 will involve the construction of the units in the central portion of the site, and Phase 3 will complete the remaining units in the western portion of the site using the same sequence for construction activities as described above. Any outstanding/remaining items will be completed in Phase 3 along with any landscaping issues that may arise. All street stormwater basins and silt separators will be checked again and cleaned out as necessary prior to the completion of construction activities.\ As construction equipment loading/unloading, materials storage, and construction staging areas and construction worker parking will be located within the site, no significant or long-term construction impacts to the surrounding residences are anticipated. Installation of a construction access/exit at Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street will minimize significant adverse impacts on the residences along Highland Road and Bridle Lane. Erosion control measures will be implemented during construction of the proposed project in order to minimize significant adverse impacts. In accordance with the NYSDEC Phase II SPDES Program, coverage under the General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities (NYSDEC Permit No. GP-0-08-001, General Permit) will be obtained prior to the initiation of construction activities. Prior to filing for coverage under the General Permit, the NYSDEC requires that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be prepared for the parcel, including a detailed erosion and • sediment control plan, to manage stonnwater generated on-site during construction activities, and for post-construction stormwater management. An SWPPP will be prepared to ensure compliance with water quality and quantity requirements pursuant to Technical Guidance and GP-0-08-001 requirements. In addition, an Erosion Control Plan incorporating the NYSDEC Technical Guidance manual, and use of measures such as silt fencing, storm drain inlet protection, hay bales, and good housekeeping procedures will be utilized. The drainage system and revegetation plan will further provide permanent stormwater controls once construction is completed. Development of the property is not anticipated to significantly increase erosion/sedimentation or stormwater impacts, as a result of proper site grading procedures, erosion controls, and drainage system design. The Notice of Intent (NOT) requesting coverage under the General Permit will be filed in accordance with NYSDEC requirements, prior to the initiation of construction activities at the subject property. There will be limited truck traffic to the site. Garbage collection and the occasional delivery to the residents will be expected, much as the surrounding area sees. A truck loading area will be provided for the deliveries to the community center. 5.2.1 Impacts and mitigation Impacts to Soils and Topography • As with the proposed project the impacts of the alternative project on the soils of the site will be minor. The alternative plan does not consist of many changes to the existing terrain and any regarding for the roads and building sites will be kept to a minimum. Due 77 to the nature of the soils on the site, the excavated materials from the creation of the alternative will be reused in areas that required filling. Any topsoil that is removed during the creation of the roads and buildings will be stockpiled and reused in the landscape areas As with the proposed project a minor impact to the site is the loss of the 45+ acres of agricultural soils and the fact that there is no mitigation proposed. However this alternative will conform to all of the town zoning laws and local zoning laws. Mitigation of Soils and Topography As stated the impacts to the soils of the site with the construction of this alternative will be minimal. The grading of the site will follow that of the existing site as closely as possible other than the creation of roadways and housing footprints. Also any steep slopes will be cut down to stabilize these and protect from impacts due to erosion. The soils that are excavated during the construction will remain on site and be used for the creation of the vegetated areas and as fill where needed and will also aid in the stabilization of existing slopes. According to the Nelson &_Pope Pesticide report for the proposed site (Appendix D) it is recommended that a soil management plan be prepared to mitigate exposure to arsenic and mercury. SCDHS outlines soil management guidance to ensure that dermal contact, • ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soils does not occur. Soil management options include: on-site stockpiling, on-site burial and/or covering of soils with sufficient material to prevent exposure. Soil management will involve isolation of soils as part of the grading plan to ensure that either non-impacted subsoils are exposed at the surface, or impacted surface soils are covered with at least one (1) foot of clean soil. As this site will conform to the current zoning of the site and the zoning of the local area as shown in figure 1-1 there will be no significant adverse impacts from this project. Therefore there is no need for any mitigation. Impacts to Water Resources This project was studied for two types of impacts on the water resources of the area. The proposal of the sanitary waste fields on the site with subsequent leaching into the groundwater and the second will be the introduction of the stormwater into the ground through the recharge basin. As introduced in section 2.2.2 the water quality impacts due to the sanitary waste are a major concern and need to be evaluated. This was done using the BURBS model to show the effect of the leachate on the groundwater in terms of nitrogen (see section 2.2.2 for explanation of BURBS). Through this model, it is shown that the Nitrogen in the water will be about 6.4 mg/1 which is well below the standard of 10 mg/l. Comparisons between the proposed project and this alternative are shown in Table 5-1. 78 The second impact type that is discussed in the Proposed Project and also a concern in • this alternative is the recharge of stormwater into the groundwater and with it any contaminants that were carried with the stormwater to the recharge sites. Stormwater runoff from pavement has been found to be contaminated with coliform and other bacteria, nutrients, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and pesticides. Stormwater runoff has been shown to be the leading source of bacterial loading in the surface waters of Suffolk and Nassau Counties. This has been confirmed by studies done by the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP), which explored alternatives to the disposal of stormwater from urbanized surfaces. However, this study showed that the pollutants in the runoff are not an indicator of the pavement surface but of the watershed area surrounding the site and that reductions in pollutants from the watershed will lead to a reduction of pollutants in the recharge water. It should be noted however, that this site is not a major roadway and pollution will be to a minimum consisting of rubber from tires and hydrocarbons. As this site has over 30' of sand to scrub the recharge water before it will enter the aquifer, most of the contaminants will be eliminated prior to reaching the water supply. Another concern is that this alternative could impact the local wells of the houses that surround the site. As stated above this project will not be altering the quantity of the recharge water from the site. Also, and any water that is recharged to groundwater and eventually the aquifer system, in which these wells are associated, will have over 50 feet of sand to filter any contaminants that may enter the system due to the runoff of the streets and any fertilizers that may be placed on the lawns and garden areas. This stated there will be no significant adverse impact to the water quantity or quality recharged to • the groundwater and eventually the aquifer. Mitigation of Impacts to Water Resources Development of this alternative could affect the groundwater in several ways. However due to the nature of the site these impacts will be minimized. All runoff will be maintained on the site. This will be recharged in either leach pools or the recharge basin. As the site has over 30' of sand to filter through before it reaches the aquifer the water will be of drinking water quality at that time. Also, this alternative will use public water and not well water reducing its impact to the levels of the aquifer in the vicinity of the site. Also the design of this project will allow for all required sanitary setbacks from drinking water wells in the vicinity of the site. Impacts on the Ecology of the Site As with the proposed project the construction of this alternative will require the removal of the field/successional scrub and hardwoods that have thrived on this site to allow for the building of the complex and the vegetation plantings around the structures and site. Due to this there will be a decrease in the number of birds and mammals that will frequentg P the site though the number of species on the site will remain. Also, this alternative, as with the proposed, will remove some highly invasive species of plants. These plants, allowed to flourish on the site will eventually move off the site to other • areas creating further problems. 79 Overall, this alternative will have a positive impact on the vegetation of the site. The removal of the invasive species will allow the flourishing of the native species and the • creation of new habitats for the wildlife of the area. Mitigation of the Ecology of the Site With the construction of the site under this alternative, mitigation of the impacts to the ecology will be two fold. This project requires the removal of the invasive plant species from the site and the replacement of these plants with native species. Secondly, areas of the site have been selected to be vegetated buffers around the perimeter of the property. These areas will create habitat for the wildlife of the site and may attract other species of the area. Impacts to Land Use and Zoning Zonine As this alternative will conform to the existing zoning of the site there are no significant adverse impacts anticipated. Plans Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Report (1994) N This alternative will provide a significant number of affordable residential units, which conforms to the applicable general recommendation of this plan. Therefore, no significant adverse impact is • anticipated with respect to this plan. S'eaview Trails of the North Fork(1994) N This alternative does not include walking trails for either site residents or for community use, though sidewalks are proposed along the site's internal roadway for the use and convenience of the site's residents. While the project does not provide such an amenity (as generally recommended by this plan), its absence is not significant on a Townwide basis, as sufficient amounts of undeveloped land and/or open space remain available on which to locate this feature. In addition, the property is located in close proximity to Cutchogue hamlet, and as a result walking within the hamlet is expected to occur. Peconic Estuary Program (1995) - It is noteworthy that the project site is not located in proximity to the Peconic Estuary, and is separated from the shoreline by multi-lane roadways and developed areas. Nevertheless, it is possible for activities on the subject property to impact water quality within the estuary via surface runoff flow. By such a mechanism, chemical substances and/or eroded soil may be carried from the site southward to the estuary in stormwater runoff. However, it is anticipated that, as the project will be subject to the thorough review and approval processes of the Town and County for the site plan and drainage system, and by conformance to the applicable stormwater handling regulations, the potential for impacts to the Peconic Estuary will be minimized. The alternative is proposed at a land use density which is less than the maximum allowable flow permitted under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. • As a result, no significant adverse impacts are expected to this resource. 80 Economic Development Plan (1997) N This alternative is a private residential • development for retirement-age households, and has a significant affordable component; it does not include any agricultural, fishing or commercial components or facilities or amenities for use by the public or local community. As a result, the recommendations of this plan do not apply, and no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Southold Township: 2000 Planning Initiatives (1997) N This alternative represents development in conformance with its existing HD (Hamlet Density) zoning, which was applied to this site by the Town Board subsequent to prior review. In this respect, the zoning (and therefore the alternative project) represents the type of use and yield considered appropriate for this particular property, after analysis by the Town Board. Therefore, this project conforms to this plan, and no significant adverse impacts will occur. Community Preservation Project Plan (CPPP; 1998) - The ownership of the project site has not been contacted by the administration of the CPPP with an offer to purchase the site for preservation, or for the purchase of the site's development rights. Therefore, there are no significant adverse impacts to or from this plan with respect to the alternative project. County Route 48 Corridor, Land Use Study (1999) - As the subject property is not located on or within the CR 48 corridor, the recommendations of this plan do not apply to this alternative and, hence, no significant adverse impacts will occur. • Farm and Farmland Preservation Program (1983-2002) and Southold Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (2000) - As noted above, the subject site is presently a naturally-vegetated property; no agricultural activity is presently occurring here, and no such use has been found on this site for some time. As such, the recommendations of these plans will not apply, and therefore no significant adverse impacts are expected. Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy (2000) N This alternative will conform to the amount of sanitary wastewater (and hence, of the volume of water consumed for domestic purposes) allowed by Article 6 of the SCSC. In addition, it will provide for on-site treatment and recharge of all sanitary wastewater generated, through the use of septic systems. These will be subject to the review and approval of the SCDHS, which has jurisdiction in this regard. In consideration of this, it is anticipated that no significant adverse impact to groundwater resources will occur. Recommendations related to agricultural use or activities do not apply, as no such uses exist or are proposed. Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan (2001) - As noted above, the subject site is not located within either of the corridors centered on CR 48 or NYS Route 25. Therefore, the recommendations of this plan do not apply to the alternative project, and no significant adverse impacts will occur. • Blue Ribbon Commission for Rural Southold (2002) - It is acknowledged that the subject site is presently a naturally vegetated open space (occupied by successional field species), 81 and will be considered a prime candidate for preservation or reduced-density residential development. However, the site is zoned HD by the Town, which is a zoning type intended for increased density development due to the presence or proximity of necessary infrastructure and a complementary land use pattern. This alternative will be developed in conformance with its zoning; no increased density or yield is proposed. It should also be noted that the landowner has not been approached with an offer to purchase the site or to obtain its development rights (for either a PDR or TDR action). As a result, it is anticipated that no significant adverse impacts to the recommendations of this plan will occur. Southold Comprehensive Implementation Strategy (CIS) and GEIS (2003) N This alternative has been designed to conform to all applicable Town requirements, as reflected in the Town Zoning Code. As the recommendations of the CIS are to be implemented by revisions and/or amendments to the Town Code and/or other applicable land use policies, it is expected that conformance to these regulations will simultaneously conform to the recommendations of the CIS. As this alternative conforms to the Town Code, no significant adverse impacts to the CIS are anticipated. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2005) - The LWRP recognizes the Town zoning map and the hamlet study initiative. Proposed zoning and access recommendations primarily relate to the more immediately coastal zone area. The LWRP did not recommend any changes in the current zoning with respect to the subject property; as a result, no significant adverse impacts are expected with respect to this plan. Southold Hamlet Study (2005) - As the subject site is not located in the Cutchogue HALO Zone, the recommendations of this plan will not apply to the site or to this alternative, and no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Long Island North Shore Heritage Area (2005) N This alternative will conform to those Preservation Policies that apply to this private development application. Specifically, construction will include use of environmentally-friendly materials and mechanical systems where possible, will conform to applicable design and development requirements, and will employ sound land use and siting principles in its project layout. In this way, no significant adverse impacts related to this alternative are expected. Town Affordable Housing Needs Assessment (2005) N This alternative includes a number of its residences (I I%) as affordable units, which will assist in addressing the Town's concerns in this matter. Community Preservation Project Plan Update (2006) - The owner of the subject site has not been contacted in regard to the potential for public purchase of the site or its development rights, as part of the CPPP. Therefore, there remain no potential issues with respect to this plan for this alternative. Town Zoning Maps/Code and Comprehensive Plan - As noted above, the Town of • Southold does not presently have a current comprehensive or master land use plan. In lieu of such a document, the Town utilizes its Zoning Code and the recommendations of 82 the various land use plans and studies (of which those applicable to the project site are • addressed in this section) to provide a framework within which development in the Town is to take place. This alternative has been designed to conform to the requirements of the HD zone, as well as to the various requirements of the SCSC, particularly Article 6. It is therefore anticipated that conformance to these regulations and requirements will minimize if not eliminate the potential for significant adverse impacts to the Town's resources (which is the goal and intent of these regulations). Mitigation for Land Use and Zoning The above discussions of the alternatives conformance to those aspects and/or recommendations of the above-listed land use plans and studies uniformly indicate that no significant adverse impacts will occur. Therefore, no further mitigation (beyond this alternates site design and project components) is necessary or proposed. Impacts on Community Facilities and Services As stated with the Proposed Project, letters have been sent to all the local services that could possible be impacted by the construction of this site. Though few response letters have been received (Appendix H) the following is assumed: • Police It is anticipated that there will be no significant adverse impact on the police force of the area Fire It is anticipated that the fire department of the area is capable of handling the increase in homes due to this project. Also this site will employ the latest fire fighting technology to aid the local departments if need be. School District Being that this project is the development of a 55+ active adult community and it is unlikely that there will be any significant adverse impact on the school district. However, with the increase in population there will be an increase in school taxes. Utilities It is anticipated that this project will have no significant adverse impact on the utilities of the area. Mitigation for the Community Facilities and Services It is anticipated that this project will not affect the community in any negative capacity. As it is a 55 or older adult community it is unlikely that there will be any significant • adverse impact on the school district. Also, the facility will have all state of the art fire facilities that will aid in all fire fighting needs of the local volunteer fire departments. As 83 this is a gated community there is not expected to be any need for an increase in the local police force. • Impacts to Open Space and Community Character As with the proposed project, this alternative was assessed for both positive and negative impacts on the Open Space and Community Character of the area. As stated this space is considered open space. It though has not been slated by the county for purchase. The creation of this alternative will diminish the open space of the area, however it will be in keeping with the look of the adjacent neighborhood and area. Through the buffer area this alternative will be virtually unseen in the next 10 years other than the roofs of the new buildings. The view of the property will be the same as that of the proposed project found in Appendix C. As with the proposed project, this alternative will need to remove contaminants from the soils that come with building on an agricultural site. This will not only protect the new residences but will protect the neighboring properties that are exposed to these contaminants. As with any construction project, there will be short term impacts such as construction noise, dust and excess trucks on the roads. These though are anticipated to be short term and once construction finishes they will dissipate. Mitigations to Impacts on Open Space and Community Character • As indicated above there could be several minor impacts from this alternative on the community character and the open space. Through the use of plantings, like that of the proposed plan, the impact of the project will be minimized. The impacts on open space will be minimized by the use of vegetated buffers and open grassways along the roadways. Additional mitigation will result from the cleanup of the contaminated soils on the site. This cleanup will help to protect the neighborhood from the influx of contaminants left over from the agricultural days of the site. The short term impacts of the construction will be mitigated by the use of dust control measures and having all work take place during the daylight hours to minimize the impacts to the neighborhood. To control the noise of the construction trucks as with the construction will be limited to working during the daylight hours. Plantings, as stated above, will create a buffer around the site virtually hiding all but the rooflines of the new houses. This will be a two fold mitigation measure, in that the new planting will not only lower the impact of the new development on the eye of the neighbors but will also be completely constructed of native plantings which will be stronger and rely on less irrigation and other plant care that a non-native plant will require. Another major concern around a construction site is the safety of the families that are living near the site. As stated all of the truck traffic will be limited to the daylight hours • to provide the visibility to both the truckers and the neighbors to avoid any vehicle to vehicle or vehicle pedestrian accidents. The site will be fenced to protect from anyone 84 entering the site and either falling into holes or tripping over any construction debris or • equipment. Also, open holes will be fenced to protect against anyone falling into. Lastly, all construction material will be removed or stored properly to protect against anyone injuring himself or herself on construction debris that has been handled improperly. Impacts to Cultural Resources The Phase I Archaeological Investigation prepared for the site made the following conclusions and recommendations (see Appendix G): The Phase IA bad determined the study area had higher than average potential for the recovery of prehistoric sites_ The property had a moderate potential for Native American historic sites but a low potential for European-American sites. The Phase IB resulted in the excavation of 767 ST's. Isolated prehistoric and historic finds were encountered. The prehistoric finds were too few in number and too disconnected to warrant further assessment. The historical finds were also few in numbers and were found in the plow zone area, an area that may have been disturbed by agricultural activity. Any agricultural activity will disarrange the original stratigraphy of the area, rendering the chronology inaccurate. No further work is therefore recommended. Mitigation for Cultural Resources Impacts • As with the proposed project, the alternative plan will have no significant adverse impacts to cultural resources. (No such resources are present, as determined by the Phase I Archaeological Investigation prepared for the project site) and no further archaeological investigation is recommended, no mitigation measures are necessary or proposed. 5.3 Alternative 3: Decreased Number of Units This alternative involves the construction of 125 attached and detached units on the site. It is proposed that these units would not be age restricted, which based on the applicant's experience, increases the marketability of the units thereby justifying the further reduction in units from the allowable yield (one unit per 10,000 square feet of lot area, with community water and sewer utilities provided). A map of this alternative is shown in Figure 5-2 and also in Plate 5. This site will be serviced by public water and an on-site STP. This alternative will include 125 units of which 112 units will be single family detached units and 5 structures will have a total of 13 multifamily dwellings that will be deemed as affordable housing. This site will also include a community center, pool and tennis court. The project will include the creation of landscaped areas, access roadways and a storm drainage system that will utilize a combination of subsurface leaching pools and catch basins, as well as created surface drainage swales. • The site will be accessed off a road constructed at the intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street. This road will create the center split of the site with loop roads 85 extending off to access the houses. Sidewalks will follow the paths of the roads. Each . house is located approximately 20 feet from the roadway. Each house (including one of the affordable units) will be serviced by an individual driveway or, in the case of the remaining 12 affordable units, by common parking areas. Two emergency access points are proposed, one on the northwestern portion of the site and one on the southwestern portion of the site The on-site drainage system would be distributed throughout the property. This system would be designed to accommodate a six inch storm as required by the Town of Southold standards. As stated above, each home will be serviced by the on-site STP, to be located in the southeastern comer of the property. Solid waste will be removed by private carters and a dumpster will be located at the community center. It is anticipated that this alternative as with the proposed project will require that the entire site be cleared, so that proper grades can be provided for the swales and drainageways of the drainage system, the building footprints, and for the proposed roadways. It is proposed that the cut for the basements, footings, and drainage structures will cover the amount of fill needed for the grading operations creating, hopefully, an excess amount of fill and no need for any outside sources. The homeowners association will be responsible for the maintenance of all the stormwater drainage facilities, the roadways, and the common areas. This project will require a NYSDEC State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit for the stormwater system and the erosion control measures during the project. • In accordance with the town requirements all stormwater runoff from impervious areas will be retained on the site, and recharged into groundwater in the proposed recharge basin. This system is sized to maintain a six inch storm. The homeowners association will be responsible for the maintenance of all the stormwater drainage facilities, the roadways, and the common areas. This project will require a NYSDEC State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit for the stormwater system and the erosion control measures during the project. As shown on the alternative plan, one access would be provided to the site. This will be located on the south side of the project at the intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street. This access will be stop controlled and configured for all movement. There are two other entrances to the site that will be for emergency use only. These are at the end of Spur Drive and also at the end of Bridle Lane. These gates will be maintained with the use of crash gates. The main entrance road will enter the site on the south end and create a middle corridor of the site with horseshoe shaped roads extending off of this to access the homes. Sidewalks are proposed, in this alternative, to follow the roadway throughout the entire site. As per the town requirement for this site, 283 parking spaces are required. This alternative plan will provide 296 stalls for the use of the community including 250 stalls • for the use of the individual homeowners or the parking areas of the affordable housing units, and 46 stalls at the community center. 86 I I I I HALF IwA�aAlrA wM^o�ar ar I R.A oA �A 3 - -- 1901.44' (DEED) /' 53890'50"E (DEED) 1904.80• (ACNPL), — S38-24'20-E (ACTUAL) —--—-- —- -_ m TN o If IsC C A B A B B A C O -al 7 1 N 1 n m ' T-7-7 I _ __ ____ _ _ _____ _ __ __ ___ _ _ ___ __ ____ --- 1 537'04.40'E _- 273.68' 1 A B C R C A B L R D A C A B C A \• \\ I / �� inOu JO 0 IIS• V \ -- IcoF CJNJe �r'"S]7'04'40LE g @ �,r.. 95.00• 1 CRIFTING ,rfo Nm STREET NPIF.uO"tlFALY rC G 4i, I O tPONONOE m n m S3713'30"E (OEE01 'r-' 5310 'I.QE ACTUAL�2.ji� � R P I�'1-;- Ln Ln L1'1111, 41 IyI IF -11 00.00 n n .IQi nl r } �N r1o.Faetnr • NI !` A na1AG I1W< v i � Y I1 � LOEO IeAAI z A B f. A C r` _PT— Z _ A I I e 1 ` A B a B L C / I I I I i B 4 3 qq. ______ ______ _ j _ _ ___________ _ O _ ____ff__ _ _ __- ___ ____ iC B C A B A B - AC R B A Cz [ A f -____ ° BA m - ______ ____ ____ _______ ______- ________ _____-_ ________________________ __ c I d r: a e Access claw _o -_� — — N364 ------ ' -- e —r - - - - - IMNFMnIM+•v I D r a D.F Y° A roMN r aN M" NaeF ,,G 209.51 200 .22' (DACTDU)A L ) I'ai'�OwII.RO�°ic nrP'P- W I pAw w xwAawar oE.aroslr. mm v.6 P.w W a wlanA wuxri Y PTMA tl. I :a:1 6 IINEr R SIIMLY R I I IIF8M41 NAI QOFRY 6 J wxc IDI PARKING CALCULATIONS N � nmMLa m ZONING DATA A A A LY p m oM na 3 m 5 PUt D•OI nn WRM1SP/6S etuw¢ x r-3332V P.vLY .�snpAormAaS Pert DNVLnM 0 RA.[. � . SITE DA rA tlreiaM::INA]t oEPsm(wl ur le 31Nn� 1]aArEs pvEp Nobe yay.m]E- o xsi Ali 41u. Ima-1'.3-n�_ 9In•rEyplR iG PwRr RTMtD U6LM5: I3 WR.1�]P.•6q/uMR-] 3ME6r-KYR I.VO.YlI.d ff s aJ..lf 3 1(rtw PMAIO pLIgFO FLN WISI-3)I SPwES Ig IO.PMnxG.PAroPn9pR S4wld Sr- I .tl. a LS NR xM WEm SI.al9t6 Sr- 3]q ]nII(p xN(et pLygry PLSYNiw 9fE M1FA Y.N1.II IJlS-LS.3a3J MtES wmr!r IEvPiNPIM(SfQiFFR11 I ma.m0 ]213S1111].1p, SI Ef (N.bl)K'1 1 MvSP/QE'S PAfFEANR1f)1eXS mURI WrouIME 1.m11Rll l4v2 5ffrISBBS NN 9F Im� Sp NV3HR rf W19- IRS itwNr tIFCT) MI xlim mM11m IIXrEN fJA e.ms LIa xl W/GS MIN9EA Of 4.YLA45- 119(MCLLPM:CA/MMIn m(IFA.]F.Wp YNMMINICE f bNGEI g]1ryryE Yyq 15 app SF$r/ ,LU 1/ SP :��V.. > (EFtI) ]a J20 NY I. /!m a�- 1�. Iewv rAm 0¢0 n a a IFlaps caMr x rams x]/m $nm Dlsmcr/e arra£Anon MFn(m n.NMO eso vrAai Ema xxl.(s3.Pi.AMl0 tma xouNtn wawa: - •n1R lM IwlrYML ry IMq dL/AOIL1. al.rs lIPWm!a MwyaSMF c ee�msSOo 39v1>pssIJ mWYIA1nia QXrq MIN P1aR ME IYMro Im t.lR Jx Wn. lWr Im ls.mp EP dP ALT6N7E ALK3NhBdf FLAN _ _ DNx n' o a. mr iiaoaF uMr n le.ea s s l tY Dn DNo.IMa. 3 SPw PEA DNI+,.w,M a THE HAM-ET AT CUTCHOCNIE oMon 40 BANW'If]LW!(FFER x In ff5 AP7e1CC11Ph RMS III INT•n a OWNER: SM1 X=. 3 SC3R:mrfE QR 1E APPLICANT: WAI !LgJeA+ x Sv _ In swFs ,m p, IOLry51nFEr PMWL 2N WIS ' lrM]90M GI M]R.w MS Iq!wS 161RKIF0 PrRY•ID PWaOF➢im WR- 3)]� +wr,e-tea. mu.r'�.irw rwa NDCRD, TrM 172 NERIr T AT EIIN A NU uc co.nMm�� ®_�LSC)N s POPE I� 110 EAST MNN Sr. 1J21-D NOIx1M OCEAN AVENUE R4HfP , NY 11901 NmFORD, NY II763 Iw3 w.< InrbY xM PMTaI: 1 YMN PC Y f S\TN 11NC Figure 5-2 • Required parking for residential uses is 244 spaces based on 2 spaces per single family detached and attached dwelling units and 1.5 spaces per unit for affordable units. Additionally, one space per 300 SF of recreational facility uses (community building and pool) and five spaces per tennis court are required pursuant to Town parking requirements for a total of 38 spaces required for accessory recreational areas. One truck loading space is also required for a community center with a floor area of 5,000 to 25,000 SF. Sanitary wastewater generated as a result of this alternative project will be treated utilizing an on-site STP. Table 5-2 below provides a list of the individual components of the project's wastewater generation. Sanitary calculations are also found on the plan sheet for this alternative located in Plate 5. This form of disposal is acceptable in cases where the projected wastewater design flow exceeds standards established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). Article 6 of the SCSC addresses sewage facility requirements for realty subdivisions, in order to limit the loading of nitrogen in various groundwater management zones as established by the SCDHS. As promulgated under Article 6, a Population Density Equivalent must be determined for the subject site in order to determine the type of sewage disposal system required for the type and size of this alternative. This equivalent (or total allowable flow) is then compared to the design sewage flow for the project. If the project's design sewage flow exceeds the Population Density Equivalent, a • community sewage system or on-lot sewage treatment system is required. If the project's design sewage flow is less than the site's Population Density Equivalent, conventional septic systems may be used, provided individual systems comply with the current design standards and no community sewerage system is available or accessible. The project site is located within Groundwater Management Zone IV as defined by the SCDHS. Based on the requirements of Article 6, no more than 600 gallons of sanitary wastewater may be discharged per acre on a daily basis within this zone, provided public water supply is available. The project will utilize public water supply provided by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA). The acreage used for determining this Population Density Equivalent must not include wetlands, surface waters, or land in flood zones. The subject site is 45.99 acres in size (and does not require exclusion of underwater lands, wetlands or areas within flood zones), thus, the Population Density Equivalent (total allowable flow) on the subject site is calculated as: 45.99 acres x 600 gpd/acre = 27,594 gallons per day (gpd) 45.99 acres X 43,560 SF/acre X 1 unit/20,000 SF= 100 units, then, 100 units X 0.75 = 75 units, finally, 75 units X 300 gpd/unit = 22,500 gpd Based on SCDHS sanitary design flow factors, the anticipated sanitary wastewater generated by the site is as follows: The SCDHS sanitary design flow factors for • residential units applied by the SCDHS is 300 gpd. Therefore, it is estimated that the 125 proposed residences will generate approximately 37,500 gpd of sewage flow. This is in 87 excess of the maximum sanitary flow allowed for septic systems, so this alternative would require an STP. • TABLE 5-3 TOTAL WASTEWATER GENERATION ALTERNATIVE 3 Description SCDHS Design Flow Factor Total Wastewater 125 residences 300 gpd/unit 37,500 gpd 1,000 SF gym (community center) 030 gpd per SF 300 gpd 1,500 SF office(community center) 0.06 gpd per SF 90 gpd Pools (75 bathers/day) 5 gpd/bather 375 gpd Total 38,265 gpd No previous connections to SCWA water mains exist on site. It is assumed that in this alternative, water to be used for irrigation will be public water. The site is a fallow field with successional vegetation, mostly invasive species, with no mature trees. As with the proposed plan, this alternative will clear the entire site and replace the landscaping with lawn and with acceptably naturalized species plantings, this • will encompass approximately 60 % of the property. This landscaping will involve the planting of the center medians of the roadways and the areas between and along the houses as well as a vegetated buffer area screening the site from that of the neighbors. The plantings for this alternative plan will mimic that of the proposed project plan as shown in the Planting Plan in Plate 2. As stated nearly all plant material specified of the vegetation planted will be that of acceptably naturalized species which will require less water and maintenance. The turf and the vegetation will require some care which will entail fertilization. This is estimated to be approximately 2.30 pounds of fertilizer per 1,000 SF of area. The irrigation is assumed to be approximately 5.5 inches from May to September. Lighting will be needed for the parking areas, roadways, and the exterior of the buildings. All lighting will be consistent with the applicable town standards. Recreational lighting will be located around the outdoor pool and the tennis courts. Town code allows for recreational lighting to exceed the 14-foot maximum height, but requires the following two criteria: • All intensive recreational lighting shall be so located on the property with reference to surrounding properties that it shall be reasonably screened from view and compatible with the existing or potential use of neighboring properties. • No outdoor recreational facility, public or private, shall be illuminated after 11:00 p.m. • except to conclude a recreational or sporting event or any other similar activity conducted at or in the facility, which was in progress under such illumination prior to 11:00 p.m. 88 The proposed lighting for the tennis courts will be turned off at 9:00 P.M. so as to not • impact the surrounding properties and to comply with Town Code. Open space is not specifically provided for this alternative, open grass areas are located in the median of the roadways and some areas on the western edge of the property. The residents will be provided a common pool area, community center and tennis courts for recreational purposes and additional open space can be found in a nearby park. This alternative will, like that of the proposed project require approximately a 12-18 month approval process, followed by posting of bonds, letting of construction contracts and a construction period of 18-24 months. As a result, the general time frame for staging and completion of this alternative will be in the range of 2 to 3 years. The project will be developed in three phases, as required by the Town. The construction phase would most likely progress in a manner typical for a project of the size and type proposed; no unique or unusual construction difficulties are anticipated. Impacts during the construction phase are commonly expected and are identified and discussed herein. As detailed below, these impacts are temporary in nature, and will be variable throughout the construction period. Construction activities will not occur outside weekday daytime hours (7 AM to 5 PM), and will conform to applicable Town regulations regarding construction noise generation and hours. The first phase of construction will include clearing, grubbing, grading, erosion control • and soil management work. This will include building and planting of the proposed berms, which will provide screening of construction activities from the adjacent residential uses. The entire site will be cleared which will be subject to erosion during the construction phase, and will be the areas from which dust could arise, due to truck and equipment movement and winds. Following completion of clearing activities, survey of road alignment and vertical control will be completed to establish road installation and proper grades. The grading concept will involve use of material excavated elsewhere within the site to raise the grade in limited fill areas. The remainder of the property is relatively flat and foundation excavated material will be used to contour the land for proper drainage around buildings. The boundaries of the construction area will be lined with silt fence and staked hay bales, and drainage inlets will be protected by soil traps. It is anticipated that all construction equipment, materials and vehicles will be staged, parked and loaded/unloaded within the site. The intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street will be used for all construction access associated with the proposed project. Due to the proposed net export of material, it is proposed to reuse as much of this material on-site as practicable, in order to minimize the volume of material to be removed from the site (and the number of truck trips necessary to remove it). Generally, the site will be constructed starting on the southeastern portion of the property and progress west, much the same as the proposed project. The model homes, • community building and approximately 30 homes will be started and completed during this first phase of construction, including the utilities and landscaping for these areas. The model homes will be built on the first loop of the road directly behind the community 89 building. A sales office (trailer) for the project will also be set up at this time and will be located in the community building parking area and then relocating to the model homes • once completed. The construction field office will also be located in this same area and relocated into the site as construction progresses to the west. Similarly, employee parking, staging and equipment storage areas will also be moved periodically as construction progresses into the site. The building materials for each home will be stored at the home site as needed and the pre-cast catch basins and piping will be staged along the roadway and in the area of the leaching fields and pond areas where most of this material will be used. The complete infrastructure will be developed in this phase including all underground utilities and internal roadways completed less the paving portion, which will be installed as sections are completed. The balance of the homes in this phase will commence with excavation for foundations, concrete, framing, interior work and finishes until complete including all utility connections, final street paving and final landscaping. Phase 2 will involve the construction of the units in the central portion of the site, and Phase 3 will complete the remaining units in the western portion of the site using the same sequence for construction activities as described above. Any outstanding/remaining items will be completed in Phase 3 along with any landscaping issues that may arise. All street stormwater basins and silt separators will be checked again and cleaned out as necessary prior to the completion of construction activities. As construction equipment loading/unloading, materials storage, and construction staging • areas and construction worker parking will be located within the site, no significant or long-term construction impacts to the surrounding residences are anticipated. Installation of a construction access/exit at Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street will minimize potential adverse impacts on the residences along Highland Road and Bridle Lane. Erosion control measures will be implemented during construction of the proposed project in order to minimize impacts. In accordance with the NYSDEC Phase II SPDES Program, coverage under the General Permit for Stomrwater Discharges from Construction Activities (NYSDEC Permit No. GP-0-08-001, General Permit) will be obtained prior to the initiation of construction activities. Prior to filing for coverage under the General Permit, the NYSDEC requires that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be prepared for the parcel, including a detailed erosion and sediment control plan, to manage stormwater generated on-site during construction activities, and for post-construction stormwater management. The An SWPPP will be prepared to ensure compliance with water quality and quantity requirements pursuant to Technical Guidance and GP-0-08-001 requirements. In addition, an Erosion Control Plan incorporating the NYSDEC Technical Guidance manual, and use of measures such as silt fencing, storm drain inlet protection, hay bales, and good housekeeping procedures will be utilized. The drainage system and revegetation plan will further provide permanent stormwater controls once construction is completed. Development of the property is not anticipated to significantly increase erosion/sedimentation or stormwater impacts, as a result of proper site grading procedures, erosion controls, and drainage system design. • The Notice of Intent (NOI) requesting coverage under the General Permit will be filed in 90 accordance with NYSDEC requirements, prior to the initiation of construction activities • at the subject property. traffic to the site. Garbage collection and the occasional There will be limited truck t g delivery to the residents will be expected, much as the surrounding area sees. A truck loading area will be provided for the deliveries to the community center. 5.3.1 Impacts and Mitigation Impacts to Soils and Topography As with the proposed project, the impacts of this alternative project on the soils of the site will be minor. The alternative plan does not consist of many significant changes to the existing topography and any regrading for the roads and building sites will be kept to a minimum. Due to the acceptable engineering qualities and nature of the soils on the site, the excavated subsoils will be reused in areas of the site that require filling; it is not expected that there would be any significant amount of truck traffic to either remove or import soil to the site. Any topsoil that is removed during the creation of the roads and buildings will be stockpiled and reused in the landscape areas. As with the proposed project, the minor impact to the site's soils is the loss of the 45+ acres of agricultural soils and the fact that there is no mitigation proposed for this impact. However this alternative will conform to the Town zoning laws. • Mitigation of Soils and Topography As stated above, the impacts to the soils of the site with the construction of this alternative will be minimal. The grading of the site will follow that of the existing site as closely as possible other than the creation of drainageways, roadways and housing footprints. Also any steep slopes will be reduced to stabilize these and protect them from future impacts due to erosion. The soils that are excavated during the construction will remain on- site and be reused for the creation of the vegetated areas and as fill where needed, and will also aid in the stabilization of existing slopes. According to the Nelson & Pope Pesticide Report for the proposed site (Appendix D) it is recommended that a soil management plan be prepared to mitigate exposure to arsenic and mercury. SCDHS outlines soil management guidance to ensure that dermal contact, ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soils does not occur. Soil management options include on-site stockpiling, and on-site burial and/or covering of soils with sufficient material to prevent exposure. Soil management will involve isolation of soils as part of the grading plan to ensure that either non-impacted subsoils are exposed at the surface, or that impacted surface soils are covered with at least one (1) foot of clean soil. • As this alternative will conform to the current zoning of the site and the zoning of the local area as shown in Figure 1-1, there will be no significant adverse impacts from this project. Therefore no additional mitigation is necessary or proposed. 91 Impacts to Water Resources This project was assessed for impacts on the water resources of the area. The proposal of the sanitary waste fields on the site with subsequent leaching into the groundwater and the second will be the introduction of the stormwater into the ground through the recharge basin. As introduced in section 2.2.2 the potential water quality impacts due to the sanitary waste are a major concern and need to be evaluated. This was done using the BURBS model to show the effect of the leachate on the groundwater in terms of nitrogen. (see Section 2.2.2 for explanation of BURBS). Through this model, it is shown that the Nitrogen in the water will be about 5.0 mg/1 which is well below the standard of 10 mg/l. Comparisons between the proposed project and this alternative are shown in Table 5-1. The second potential impact that is discussed in the Proposed Project and also a concern in this alternative is the recharge of stormwater into the groundwater and with it any contaminants that were carried with the stormwater to the recharge sites. Stormwater runoff from pavement has been found to be contaminated with coliform and other bacteria, nutrients, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and pesticides. Stormwater runoff has been shown to be the leading source of bacterial loading in the surface waters of Suffolk and Nassau Counties. This has been confirmed by studies done by the National Urban Runoff Program (NiJRP), which explored alternatives to the disposal of stormwater from urbanized surfaces. However, this study showed that the pollutants in the runoff are not • an indicator of the pavement surface but of the watershed area surrounding the site and that reductions in pollutants from the watershed will lead to a reduction of pollutants in the recharge water. It should be noted however, that this site is not a major roadway and pollution will be to a minimum consisting of rubber from tires and hydrocarbons. As this site has over 30' of sand to scrub the recharge water before it will enter the aquifer, most of the contaminants will be eliminated prior to reaching the water supply. Another concern is that this alternative may impact the local wells of the houses that surround the site. As stated above this project will not be altering the quantity of the recharge water from the site. Also, and any water that is recharged to groundwater and eventually the aquifer system, in which these wells are associated, will have over 50 feet of sand to filter any contaminants that may enter the system due to the runoff of the streets and any fertilizers that may be placed on the lawns and garden areas. This stated there will be no significant adverse impact to the water quantity or quality recharged to the groundwater and eventually the aquifer. Mitigation of Impacts to Water Resources Development of this alternative could impact the groundwater in several ways. However due to the nature of the site these impacts will be minimized. All runoff will be maintained on the site. This will be recharged in either leach pools or the recharge basin. As the site has over 30' of sand to filter through before it reaches the aquifer, the water • quality impacts are not anticipated as published references indicate that the primary stormwater contaminants are attenuated through this sand leaching process. Also, this 92 alternative will use public water and not well water reducing its impact to the levels of • the aquifer in the vicinity of the site. Finally, the design of this project will allow for all required sanitary setbacks from drinking water wells in the vicinity of the site. Impacts on the Ecology of the Site As with the proposed project the construction of this alternative will require the removal of the field/successional scrub and hardwoods that have thrived on this site to allow for the building of the complex and the vegetation plantings around the structures and site. Due to this there will be a decrease in the number of birds and mammals that will frequent the site, though the number of species on the site will remain. Also, this alternative, as with the proposed, will remove some highly invasive species of plants. These plants, allowed to flourish on the site will eventually move off the site to other areas creating further problems. Overall, this alternative will have a positive impact on the vegetation of the site. The removal of the invasive species will allow the flourishing of the native species and the creation of new habitats for the wildlife of the area. Mitigation of the Ecology of the Site With the construction of the site under this alternative, mitigation of the impacts to the ecology will be two fold. This project requires the removal of the invasive plant species • from the site and the replacement of these plants with native species. Secondly, areas of the site have been selected to be vegetated buffers around the perimeter of the property. These areas will create habitat for the wildlife of the site and may attract other species of the area. Impacts to Land Use and Zoning g Zoning As this alternative will conform to the existing zoning of the site there are no significant adverse impacts anticipated. Plans Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Report (1994) N This alternative will provide a significant number of affordable residential units, which conforms to the applicable general recommendation of this plan. Therefore, no significant adverse impact is anticipated with respect to this plan. Seaview Trails of the North Fork(1994) NThis alternative does not include walking trails for either site residents or for community use, though sidewalks are proposed along the site's internal roadway for the use and convenience of the site's residents. While the project does not provide such an amenity (as generally recommended by this plan), its • absence is not significant on a Townwide basis, as sufficient amounts of undeveloped land and/or open space remain available on which to locate this feature. In addition, the 93 property is located in close proximity to Cutchogue hamlet, and as a result walking within the hamlet is expected to occur. Peconic Estuary Program (1995) - It is noteworthy that the project site is not located in proximity to the Peconic Estuary, and is separated from the shoreline by multi-lane roadways and developed areas. Nevertheless, it is possible for activities on the subject to impact water qualitywithin the estuary via surface runoff flow. By such a mechanism, P Y chemical substances and/or eroded soil may be carried from the site southward to the estuary in stormwater runoff However, it is anticipated that, as the project will be subject to the thorough review and approval processes of the Town and County for the site plan and drainage system, and by conformance to the applicable stormwater handling regulations, the potential for impacts to the Peconic Estuary will be minimized. The alternative is proposed at a land use density which is less than the maximum allowable flow permitted under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. As a result, no significant adverse impacts are expected to this resource. Economic Development Plan (1997) N This alternative is a private residential development for retirement-age households, and has a significant affordable component; it does not include anagricultural, fishing or commercial components or facilities or Y � g P amenities for use by the public or local community. As a result, the recommendations of this plan do not apply, and no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Southold Township: 2000 Planning Initiatives (1997) N This alternative represents development in conformance with its existing HD (Hamlet Density) zoning, which was • applied to this site by the Town Board subsequent to prior review. In this respect, the zoning (and therefore the alternative project) represents the type of use and yield considered appropriate for this particular property, after analysis by the Town Board. Therefore, this project conforms to this plan, and no significant adverse impacts will occur. Community Preservation Project Plan (CPPP; 1998) - The ownership of the project site has not been contacted by the administration of the CPPP with an offer to purchase the site for preservation, or for the purchase of the site's development rights. Therefore, there are no effect to or from this plan with respect to the alternative project. County Route 48 Corridor, Land Use Study (1999) - As the subject property is not located on or within the CR 48 corridor, the recommendations of this plan do not apply to this alternative and, hence, no significant adverse impacts will occur. Farm and Farmland Preservation Program (1983-2002) and Southold Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (2000) - As noted above, the subject site is presently a naturally-vegetated property; no agricultural activity is presently occurring here, and no such use has been found on this site for some time. As such, the recommendations of these plans will not apply, and therefore no effects are expected. Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy (2000) N This alternative • will conform to the amount of sanitary wastewater (and hence, of the volume of water consumed for domestic purposes) allowed by Article 6 of the SCSC. In addition, it will 94 provide for on-site treatment and recharge of all sanitary wastewater generated, through • the use of septic systems. These will be subject to the review and approval of the SCDHS, which has jurisdiction in this regard. In consideration of this, it is anticipated that no significant adverse impact to groundwater resources will occur. Recommendations related to agricultural use or activities do not apply, as no such uses exist or are proposed. Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan (2001) - As noted above, the subject site is not located within either of the corridors centered on CR 48 or NYS Route 25. Therefore, the recommendations of this plan do not apply to the alternative project, and no impacts will occur. Blue Ribbon Commission for Rural Southold (2002) - It is acknowledged that the subject site is presently a naturally vegetated open space (occupied by successional field species), and will be considered a prime candidate for preservation or reduced-density residential development. However, the site is zoned HD by the Town, which is a zoning type intended for increased density development due to the presence or proximity of necessary infrastructure and a complementary land use pattern. This alternative will be developed in conformance with its zoning; no increased density or yield is proposed. It should also be noted that the landowner has not been approached with an offer to purchase the site or to obtain its development rights (for either a PDR or TDR action). • As a result, it is anticipated that no significant adverse impacts to the recommendations of this plan will occur. Southold Comprehensive Implementation Strategy (CIS) and GEIS (2003) N This alternative has been designed to conform to all applicable Town requirements, as reflected in the Town Zoning Code. As the recommendations of the CIS are to be implemented by revisions and/or amendments to the Town Code and/or other applicable land use policies, it is expected that conformance to these regulations will simultaneously conform to the recommendations of the CIS. As this alternative conforms to the Town Code, no significant adverse impacts to the CIS are anticipated. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2005) - The LWRP recognizes the Town zoning map and the hamlet study initiative. Proposed zoning and access recommendations primarily relate to the more immediately coastal zone area. The LWRP did not recommend any changes in the current zoning with respect to the subject property; as a result, no significant adverse impacts are expected with respect to this plan. Southold Hamlet Study (2005) - As the subject site is not located in the Cutchogue HALO Zone, the recommendations of this plan will not apply to the site or to this alternative, and no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. • Long Island North Shore Heritage Area (2005) N This alternative will conform to those Preservation Policies that apply to this private development application. Specifically, construction will include use of environmentally-friendly materials and mechanical 95 systems where possible, will conform to applicable design and development requirements, and will employ sound land use and siting principles in its project layout. In this way, no significant adverse impacts related to this alternative are expected. Town Affordable Housing Needs Assessment (2005) N This alternative includes a number of its residences (11%) as affordable units, which will assist in addressing the Town's concerns in this matter. Community Preservation Project Plan Update (2006) - The owner of the subject site has not been contacted in regard to the potential for public purchase of the site or its PP. Therefore, there remain no potential impacts development rights, as part of the CP with respect to this plan for this alternative. Town Zoning Maps/Code and Comprehensive Plan - As noted above, the Town of Southold does not presently have a current comprehensive or master land use plan. In lieu of such a document, the Town utilizes its Zoning Code and the recommendations of the various land use plans and studies (of which those applicable to the project site are addressed in this section) to provide a framework within which development in the Town is to take place. This alternative has been designed to conform to the requirements of the HD zone, as well as to the various requirements of the SCSC, particularly Article 6. It is therefore anticipated that conformance to these regulations and requirements will minimize if not eliminate the potential for adverse impacts to the Town's resources (which is the goal and • intent of these regulations). Mitigation for Land Use and Zoning The above discussions of the alternatives conformance to those aspects and/or recommendations of the above-listed land use plans and studies uniformly indicate that no significant adverse impacts will occur. Therefore, no further mitigation (beyond this alternates site design and project components) is necessary or proposed. Impacts on Community Facilities and Services As stated with the Proposed Project, letters have been sent to all the local services that could possible be impacted by the construction of this site. Though few response letters have been received (Appendix H) the following is assumed: Police It is anticipated that there will be no significant adverse impact on the police force of the area Fire It is anticipated that the fire department of the area is capable of handling the increase in homes due to this project. Also this site will employ the latest fire fighting technology to aid the local departments. Each home will have a fire and smoke alarm connected to a 96 central station. In addition, an alarm panel will be located in the security booth which will identify a unit with a fire emergency. School District Since this proposed alternative is not an age restricted residence there will be a significant adverse impact on the school district due to an increase of students. With this alternative approximately 107 more students could be enrolled into the school. Utilities It is anticipated that this project will have no significant adverse impact on the utilities of the area. Mitigation for the Community Facilities and Services It is anticipated that this project will not impact most of the services of the Town of Southold. However, the increase in housing will increase the number of students in the school system of the town. This will be mitigated with the increase in tax revenue received by the town due to the increase in school tax collections. Impacts to Open Space and Community Character As with the proposed project, this alternative will have both positive and negative impacts on the Open Space and Community Character of the area. This parcel is • currently a fallow field that represents passive open space in the community by virtue of its currently undeveloped status. The site is zoned HD and there is an anticipation that development will occur in conformance with zoning. As stated this space is considered open space. To date, there is no known effort for open space acquisition of the site, and to the contrary, the site remains zoned HD with recognition that its proximity to the hamlet and current zoning would lead to the use of the site for a hamlet density community. It though has not been slated by the county for purchase. The development of the site under creation of this alternative will diminish the open space of the area; however, it will be in keeping with neighborhood character as a result of its proximity to the hamlet center which lies to the south, lower density residential development to the west and agricultural open space to the north and east. The proposed project will create a residential use in conformance and in fact at a lower density than allowed by current zoning. As a result, the project will change the current undeveloped status of the site, but will not be in conflict with community character or planned use of the site as intended by zoning. Buffers are provided and attractive architectural styling will ensure that the site is an asset to the character of the community. As a result of berm features, buffers and landscaping, modest size structures, topography and the juxtaposition of the site within the community, through the buffer area this alternative will not be highly visible to the general population with the possible exception of the virtually unseen in the next 10 years other than the roofs of the new buildings. The view of the property will be very similar the same as to that of the proposed project as portrayed in illustrations found in Appendix C. As landscaping matures, the new development will blend with the fabric of the • existing community and as a result, no significant adverse impacts are expected as a result of open space and community character. 97 As with the proposed project, this alternative will involve isolation of former agricultural surface soils needed to ensure that health and safety aspects of the development are properly addressed in conformance with SCDHS guidance documents This will not only protect the new residences but will protect the neighboring properties that are exposed to these contaminants. As with any construction project, there will be short term impacts such as construction noise, dust and excess trucks on the roads. These though are anticipated to be short term and once construction finishes they will dissipate. Mitigations to Impacts on Open Space and Community Character As indicated above there are several impacts from this alternative on the community character and the open space. Through the use of plantings, like that of the proposed plan, the impact of the site will be minimized. The impacts of open space will be minimized by the use of vegetated buffers and open grassways along the roadways. This alternative unfortunately does not have the ponds as in the proposed project so the open space is considerably less. The third mitigation will be the cleanup of the contaminated soils on the site. This cleanup will help to protect the neighborhood from the influx of contaminants left over from the agricultural days of the site. The short term impacts of the construction will be mitigated by the use of dust control measures and having all work take place during the daylight hours to minimize the impacts to the neighborhood. To control the noise of the construction trucks as with the construction will be limited to • working during the daylight hours. Plantings, as stated above, will create a buffer around the site virtually hiding all but the rooflines of the new houses. This will be a two fold mitigation measure, in that the new planting will not only lower the impact of the new development on the eye of the neighbors but will also be completely constructed of native plantings which will be stronger and rely on less irrigation and other plant care that a non-native plant will require. Another major concern around a construction site is the safety of the families that are living near the site. As stated all of the truck traffic will be limited to the daylight hours to provide the visibility to both the truckers and the neighbors to avoid any vehicle to vehicle or vehicle pedestrian accidents. The site will be fenced to protect from anyone entering the site and either falling into holes or tripping over any construction debris or equipment. Also, open holes will be fenced to protect against anyone falling into. Lastly, all construction material will be removed or stored properly to protect against anyone injuring himself or herself on construction debris that has been handled improperly. Impacts to Cultural Resources The Phase I Archaeological Investigation prepared for the site made the following • conclusions and recommendations (see Appendix G): 98 The Phase IA had determined the study area had higher than average potential for the recovery of • prehistoric sites. The property had a moderate potential for Native American historic sites but a low potential for European-American sites. The Phase IB resulted in the excavation of 767 ST's. Isolated prehistoric and historic finds were encountered. The prehistoric finds were too few in number and too disconnected to warrant further assessment. The historical finds were also few in numbers and were found in the plow zone area, an area that may have been disturbed by agricultural activity. Any agricultural activity will disarrange the original stratigraphy of the area, rendering the chronology inaccurate. No further work is therefore recommended. Mitigation for Cultural Resources Impacts As with the proposed project, the alternative plan will have no significant adverse impacts to cultural resources. No such resources are present, as determined by the Phase I Archaeological Investigation prepared for the project site and no further archaeological investigation is recommended, and as such,no mitigation measures are necessary or proposed. 5.4 Alternative 5: Alternative Design for Wastewater Treatment Groundwater protection related to residential development in Suffolk County is provided by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The proposed project is located in Groundwater Management Zone IV, which, under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, permits sanitary flow of 600 gallons per day per acre, provided public • water supply is available. Public water will be provided to the subject site. As a result, best groundwater management practice will be provided through compliance with Article 6 of the SCSC. Under Article 6, the allowable flow for the subject site is 27,696 gpd. Based on Suffolk County design flow factors, senior units have a design flow of 150 gpd, for a total flow of 20,850 gpd. As a result, the sanitary flow for the units, plus an allocation of flow for the clubhouse, will be less than the allowable flow for the parcel. Consequently, the project is consistent with SCDHS requirements under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and is consistent with best groundwater management practice. If a project exceeds the allowable flow, a community sewerage treatment system (i.e. STP) is required. For projects which do not exceed the allowable flow, a STP is not required. A STP is expensive and requires land area due to setback requirements. Recent construction costs received by Nelson & Pope, Engineers & Surveyors, for STPs of a similar size and located in central and western Suffolk County are in the range of $1.8 million dollars for construction. Additional costs for annual operation typically range between $30,000 and $40,000 for utilities, sludge hauling and operators. The additional $1.8 million in cost renders the project economically infeasible, and is arbitrary given the fact that an STP is not required pursuant to SC Sanitary Code. The BURBS model further provides an estimate of the concentration of nitrogen in eroundwater under this alternative In comparison to the proposed project (where the BURBS model predicts a • concentration of 7.0 mg/1 of nitrogen in groundwater) the concentration of nitrogen in groundwater for the Alternative 5 on-site STP scenario is 4.4 mg/l of nitrogen in groundwater. The estimated reduction of nitrogen concentrations in groundwater (2.6 99 mgl) does not provide a compelling reason to construct an on-site STP. As such a facility is not required under SCDHS requirements for best groundwater management • practice, and the cost for construction of an STP renders severe economic burden on the feasibility of the project the requirement to construct an STP would have significant adverse impacts on the viability of the proposed project. It should be noted that Suffolk County policy seeks to limit the proliferation of small STP's, and in a case where one is not required, it is expected that installing such a system may not be approvable by SCDHS. Further, the construction of an on-site STP for this scenario is not in keeping with the objectives of the project sponsor. An option that will potentially permit the installation of an STP, will involve an increase in residential density to permit a project that will require an STP. A project of 184 units will exceed the allowable flow, and will require an STP. The additional 45 units will help to offset the high cost of constructing an STP, and may provide for a potentially economically viable project. The applicant is under the impression that increased land use density is not desired by the Town. The proposed project will use individual conventional sanitary systems which include a properly sized septic tank and leaching pools with adequate capacity, all designed, approved and installed in a manner consistent with SCDHS requirements. The potential groundwater impacts of this system are fully analyzed in Section 2.2.2 of this DEIS. The installation will result in less discharge than is allowed under Article 6 of the SCSC, and therefore, no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Also of benefit, is the design, which involves dispersing individual systems across a larger part of the site, as compared with a design that uses a communal system (i.e. one or more large for multiple units), that concentrate the effluent discharge in a smaller area. Further, SCDHS requires that all private wells in proximity to a conventional system be mapped, and at least 150 feet of separation provided in order to ensure that private wells are not impacted. The proposed project will result in the extension of public water west from Depot Road to the project site, which will also provide a benefit to those in the area that currently rely on private wells and will now have access to public water. No significant adverse impact on private wells will occur, as a result of the design requirements and SCDHS review and approval of the project for density and installation. In analyzing the potential impacts, considerations such as limitations of such systems, effectiveness, maintenance factors and overall cost of individual systems (versus an STP) should be considered. This analysis is provided below: Limitations N Conventional sanitary systems are limited to sites where the design flow does not exceed the allowable flow. Such systems are utilized for individual homes and can be sized for larger capacities where multiple units connect to a single communal system. These systems are routinely approved by SCDHS based on analysis of design vs. allowable flow, general subsoil conditions and depth to groundwater review, conducted at the Realty Subdivision stage. Prior to installation a permit to construct must be obtained for each system. Conventional sanitary systems are routinely approved by SCDHS for projects such as The Heritage. • Effectiveness N Conventional sanitary systems are simple and effective. These systems remove solids in the sealed, baffled septic tank, and after settling, effluent 100 overflows to a leaching system. Leaching pools are installed 3 or more feet above • regional high groundwater elevations, in order to allow conversion of ammonia (NH4), to nitrite (NOA to nitrate (NO3). Leaching through unsaturated soils removes bacteria and releases some nitrogen as a gas. Systems installed at acceptable densities which do not exceed the allowable flow for a site are the most appropriate option for sanitary wastewater disposal. Maintenance N Conventional sanitary systems are simple to maintain, and this is a key factor in the effectiveness of their design. Systems constructed to current requirements, have large capacity septic tanks for settling and removal of solids, baffled chambers for internal stages of settling, a "t" overflow which "decants" effluent from the second stage chamber in order to overflow cleaner wastewater, and leaching with sufficient capacity and potential expansion area if necessary. Systems operate on a maintenance free basis for extended periods of time. Septic tanks recommended to be pumped to remove solids on a periodic basis. Cost N Conventional sanitary systems may cost in the range of$7,000 - $9,000 to install on individual lots. Therefore, the cost of installing conventional sanitary systems for The Heritage project may be in the range of$630,000 or about $1,170,000 less than an STP. When installing an STP, the initial construction cost is only one small aspect of the cost. Soft costs are required for engineering design and review; legal costs are required for processing and filing of C&Rs; maintenance and repair; and most significantly, operating costs associated with licensed operators, monitoring, electricity and chemicals ($30,000 to $40,000 annually). STPs are complicated in comparison to conventional systems, and as a result, there is a greater potential for • incident. The initial construction is the responsibility of the developer, once constructed, an STP is offered for dedication to the Suffolk County Department of Public Works. Typically, there is a delay in SCDPW taking over operation of a plant, and in many cases, small STPs for private communities remain in private ownership. Once constructed, the STP becomes the responsibility of the community association for operation, maintenance and repair. If dedicated to SCDPW, homeowners pay a fee per gallon of waste treated in order to fund the operation, maintenance and repair of the STP by SCDPW. In both cases (private operation or SCDPW operation), this adds a substantial cost assessment to the individual homeowners in the association, and as a result, increases their living costs. There is no compelling reason to construct an STP, given that the project does not exceed the allowable flow, and conventional systems are effective, simple to operate, and reduce costs to the homeowners. Based on assessment of system limitations, maintenance factors, effectiveness and cost, as well as an overall assessment of potential impacts, the use of conventional systems for The Heritage project is suggested as the preferred alternative. • 101 6.0 REFERENCES • Burchell, R. W. D. Listokin and W. R. Dolphin, 1985. The New Practitioners Guide to Fiscal Impact Anal. Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. Greenman-Pedersen, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, The Hamlet at Cutchogue, revised June 1989 Part 617, Title 6 of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6NYCRR Part 617) Trip Generation, 7`h Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 2003. Land Use and Groundwater Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton, Water Resources Program Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University Salvato, Joseph, 1982, Environmental Engineering and Sanitation 3rd Edition, A Wiley- Interscience Publication, New York. SCDHS, 1987-1, Suffolk County Sanitary Code-Article 6 Realty Subdivisions, Development and Other Construction Projects, Amended March 4, 1987, Code of • Administrative Regulations, Hauppauge,New York. 102 Appendix A SEQRA Documentation and Correspondence i • Appendix A-1 Environmental Assessment Review Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. • • II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLAINNING CONSIDERATIONS FOR . Tliff HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE SITUATE 75 School House Lane; Cutchogue; Town of Southold, New York SCTM#: 1000=102-1-33.3 PREPARED FOR Southold Town Planning Board Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 PREPARED BY Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, BMdgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (0631) 537-5160 FAX: (631)537-5291 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to summarize the application known:as The Heritage at Cutchogue with respect to environmental and planning considerations to be evaluated in the site plan process undertaken by the Southold Town Planning Board. The Heritage at Cutchogue, LLC has requested site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board to authorize the construction of 139 attached and detached dwellings and related residential appurtenances on a 46.2 acre parcel in the Hamlet of Cutchogue. This report summarizes the proposed project and characterizes the site and surrounding area, summarizes the analysis provided by the application IJn cluding water supply and sewage disposal, drainage, and traffic issues. This report examines the proposed project with respect to the Town's Zoning Law and concludes that the project as proposed is a permitted use in the. Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District in which subject parcel lies. This report is to provide a framework for the Southold Town Planning Board to determine the magnitude and importance of the environmental impacts that can reasonably be expected to occur as a result of the project as proposed. l� 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Heritage at.Cutchogue, LLC has requested site plan approval.from the Southold Town Planning Board to authorize the construction of 139.attached and detached.dwellings and related residential appurtenances on.a 46.2 acre parcel in•the Hamlet of.Cutchogue. The overall property is bring'developed as a Planned:55+ Active Adult Community. The accessory supportfacilities include the construction of 8840 square foot clubhouse,.a.160 square foot swimming pool;two.3,200 square foot tennis courts, a 2,40.0 square foot maintenance garage, a;gazebo, a gatehouse, 322 parking spaces,.of which-278-are associated with the individual dwelling units and 44. are associated with the clubhouse and recreation facility,.197,043square feet of man made ponds,- to serve as natural.drainage areas and irrigation, 1,162,022 square feet of. landscaping and other improvements consisting of the construction=o# 219332 ;square feet of road surface, 34,236 square feet of sidewalk:improvements,. ; ncl. parking lot areas consisting of 26;932 square feet. A total of 53 parking stalls' will be.provided, 45 of which are associated with the clubhouse. The individual dwelling.units also feature separate driveways with attached garages. The site plan described above is an amendment of an earlier site plan application.which featured planned multi-family townhouse development. -The.planned multi-family townhouse development was to consist of 150 townhouse units;of which 135 units would be soid at market rates and the remaining 15 units would be sold at affordable rates. . The development.was to be served by public water and a sewage treatment plant ("Cromaglass Plant"). In the current application, the applicant has selected five typical house plans all of which are of traditional architectural design. The various. housing types altemate throughout the development in an effort to avoid a monotonous.: streetscape. The affordable units..are similarly designed and dispersed throughout the development. The applicant has filed Sanitary Plans for the Heritage prepared by Nelson. &. Pope;Surveyors/Engineers dated January 17, 2005 which plans disclose that the dwelling unitswill be served by public water and onsite sewage disposal systems. The Sanitary Plan features individual septic systems and gang systems for two, three and four single .family units. The site plan also features atandscape.plan prepared by Charles W. Kuehn - -submittedto-the-Planning-Boa rd_on.August2-4,_20Q6._ The_landscape plans-_ feature a perimeter berm surrounding the property that would be vegetated by evergreen trees including Leland Cypress and White Pine and understory shrubbery consisting of azalea, winterberry, holly and fountain grass. The landscape plans also feature the planting of street trees consisting of sugar (� maple aristocrat.pear, andsweet gum to be planted 40 feet on center. Finally, :landscaping. is provided around each-dwelling L.nit;.the plants forwhich consist of 3 winterberry, ornamental grasses, hosta, astilbe, fountain grass; hydrangea, maiden. grass and kousa dogwood. By correspondence from Jeffrey Rimland to the Planning Board dated March 22, 2007,the applicant states that the proposed project will be constructed in several phases. `The first phase will involve the basic site development which will include road layout, pond area preparation, construction of approximately six model homes and initial gatehouse and site work, After the model homes are completed we anticipate constructing.approximately forty five units per year during the next three years. Work will not commence on a phase until contracts have been entered into for the homesto be constructed for that particular phase. The first phase will be constructed in the southeastern sector of the property, with the development of the northeast sector in the next year and the remaining western section undertaken during the last year. Each section will be completely landscaped.with full roads andt amenities before the next phase is undertaken." 4 LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION Subject property is a 46.2 acre parcel located at 75 School House Lane in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold,. County of Suffolk. The property is described as SCTM # 1000-102-1=33.3. The property is an abandoned field which was previously farmed. Subject parcel is adjacent to residentially developed property to the north and west, the commercial hamlet center of Cutchogue to the south and an abandoned farm field to the east. The residential developments to the north and west are reasonably screened from the site by existing vegetation_ Similarly dense vegetation occurs at the southeastem portion of the site. Adjacent to thesouthea stern portion of the site is a trailer park_ Set forth below is an aerial photograph dated 2007 which shows.the property and surrounding area. p Access and road frontage for subject property include the eastern terminus. of Bridle Lane and Spur Road with additional frontage at the intersection .of Griffing Street and:Seliool House Lane. As proposed,the primary access the site'is from the intersection of Griffing Street and School House Lane. The secondary access is taken from the eastern terminus of Spur Road. The extension of the eastern terminus of Bridle.Lane (onto the site) will be dedicated for emergency access only. 5 . - Topography-of the site is best described as moderately sloping. The applicant prepared a plan entitled "EXISTING RESOURCES AND SITE ANALYSIS PLAN" which plan discloses steep slopes(slopes equal. or.greater than.15%) to. be located atthe'southeastern portion of the site. These steeper.slopes comprise less than 5% of the site. The remainder of the property is.characterized as moderately sloped. The construction activities,:including grading are subject to the regulatory process of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation pursuant to Phase If State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. Compliance with the Phase II SPDES.Program will require that the Applicant prepare a Sto'rmwater Pollution Prevention.Plan(SWPP) fhat must be approved by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and filed with the Planning Board and/or Town Engineer. The SWPP provides for.best management practices for erosion control. According to the Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York prepared.by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (1975) the predominant soil types are Haven Loam (HaA), Plymouth Loamy Sand (PIC) and Riverhead Sandy Loam (Rd B). 'Haven Loam is considered a class 1 agricultural soil and- is distributed along the eastern and western perimeter of the site. Haven loam comprises approximately 1/3 of the'property area- Plymouth Loamy Sand and Riverhead Sandy Loam comprise the remaining 2/3 of the property and. area concentrated in center of the property. All soil types are relatively common in the immediate Cutchogue area. The erosion potential for all soils found on site is slight to moderate. All soil types area suitable for development of house sites. The site is within an archeological and historically sensitive area based upon data from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. A Cultural Resource Assessment (Documentary Search and Field Inspection) THE HAMLET:ATCUTCHOGUE, SOUTHOLD TOWNSHIP, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK prepared.by Robert J. Kalin, July 1989 did not reveal any site conditions of significance with respect to archeological or cultural resources. The site.is best described as a successional old field. Dominant trees include red cedar, white birch and locust. Dominant shrubs include northern bayberry and raspberry with the herbaceous layer.consisting of various weeds and grasses. The site does not contain any ecologically significant resources such as wetlands and.wood lands. and does not support any threatened or endangered plant and animals. However,:non-threatened plants exist on the site and non- threatened animals are expected to utilize the site. Successional old fields are --- ----described as-apparently secure in-New-York-State as per the-New_York-Natural__. _ Heritage Program and the.New York State Departmentof Environmental Conservation. Successional old fields are common in the Town of Southold and Eastern Long island. 6 ZONING In February 1983, upon Petition of the then property owner, subject parcel Was zoned Light Multiple Residential (M) to permit the construction of a'residential community for senior citizens. In 1989, as part of a general re-zon.ing pursuant to the Town's adopted comprehensive plan, subject parcel was zoned Hamlet Density. During the 1990's subject parcel and the Hamlet Zones were again reviewed by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, and the Hamlet.Density -(H D) Residential District was.re-affirmed for this property. The purpose of the Hamlet Density Residential District is "to permit a mix.of housing types and level of residential density appropriate to the areas in and around the major Harrilet Centers, particularly, Mattituck, Cutchogue, Southold, Orient and the Village of Greenport." The district only applies to properties within %2 mile of a Hamlet Business District ofthe major Hamlets.of the Town specifically including Cutchogue. The proposed project is a permitted use in the Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District. WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL Subject parcel lies within Groundwater Management Zone. IV. Public Water is available to the property. .The applicant has submitted a Sanitary Plan for the � Nelson and Poe Engineers and Surveyors � Heritage at Cutchogue prepared by p ors g Y dated January 17, 2005 ("Sanitary Plan"). The Sanitary Plan depicts a water main connection at Griffin.Street and Spur Road. Generally, a design flow equal to 600 gallons per day per acre is permitted in Groundwater Zone IV for.parcels that are served by public water. Publio water is to be utilized for the living needs . (i.e:.cooking, bathing, and fire protection) for the future occupants of the.dwelling units for this project. The applicant is.not proposing the utilization of public water for purposes of landscape irrigation. In this application, the applicant utilizes the calculation method set forth in the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for purposes of establishing the permitted density in this Groundwater Management Zone. The calculation method provides for a permitted design flow equal.to 22,625 gallons per day. The rated design flow for this project is 21,615 gallons per day. Therefore, this proposed project complies with the density limitations set forth in the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. Because public-water is provided to the site, adequate capacity to serve the site is presumed. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS The drainage calculations for the project are summarized in the Sanitary Plan. The specifications for the project are divided into two basic categories, pervious areas and impervious areas. The pervious areas include driveway areas and _ . landscape.areas, the total for which is 1,220,362 square feet. The i. perv•,ous areas include the road area, sidewalk area, building roof area, clubhouse roof patio, pool and gazebo area, parking tot and pond area thetotal for which 792,725 square feet. Inclusion of the pond "area.as an impervious area is appropriate because the,pond area will be created by the.installation of an artificial PVC pond -liner. The applicant utilizes a.runoff coefficient of 0.3_for the pervious areas and a runoff coefficient of 1.0 for the impervious areas. The applicant proposesto install a seriesofcatch basins and leaching pools to provide for the capture and recharge of a portion of the storm water generated from the.proposed project. In addition, the applicant proposes to utilize the,pond area for runoff storage. Pond levels will be maintained in part by storm water and by rainfall. By, correspondence dated November 8., 2006, from James A. Richter, R.A., Town Engineer, to Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board in the Town of Southold, the Town-Engineer has certified that the drainage calculations provided meet the minimum requirements of the Town Code. The Town Engineer has requested further details to the overall drainage designs for further,review. The.. . -Town Engineer has also requested a provision for test holes in the general area --- of _of the drainage systems to indicate the depth.of soils and overall depth to groundwater if encountered. TRAFFIC The Applicant prepared and submitted a Traffic Impact Study: THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, July 2006 prepared by Nelson & Pope, Engineers and Surveyors (`Traffic Study').. The Traffic Study was to evaluate the potential impacts associated with a proposed senior residential development comprised of 139 condominiums.. Existing conditions were analyzed utilizing seasonally adjusted traffic volumes to represent the peak month of the year and field .geometry collected at the following intersections: Main Road (NYS_ Rte 25) at Depot Lane,Main Road (NYS Rte 25) at Gruen Street -Middle Road (CR 48) at Depot Lane, and Schoolhouse Road at Depot Lane. The traffic.volumes generated by the proposed projects were determined. utilizing Highway Capacity Software (HCS). The traffic study went on to compare the existing traffic representing a °no-build,alternative' against a "future-build" . condition. The data was analyzed to determine Level Of Service (LOS).for the surrounding road network. No changes in LOS were detected in any of the above mentioned intersections with the exception of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road at Depot Lane. —_ -- ---There;-LOSchangedfrom:P a-to_B.T_he.LOS:change from.Ato_B.reflected.a____ bracketing change in delay classification predicted to be experienced by a motorist making a left turn from Schoolhouse Road onto Depot Lane. However, the actual calculated delay occurring at A.M. peak hour.increased insignificantly from 10.0 seconds to 10.2 seconds. In addition, traffic analysis was applied at ( the proposed,access way onto.Spur Road, which analysis revealed.site generated trips varying from 3 to 4 occurring during weekday UO , P.M. and Saturdays, Although, no change in LOS is expected.to occur at the intersection 8 of Main Roadand Depot Lane. as a result of the proposed project, the traffic- study re-emphasizes the need.for the installation of a traffic signal at that location. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONCERNS. A review of the instant application before the Planning Board in consideration of the surrounding community ordistrict has revealed the following environmental and planning. concerns.to be addressed.in the preparation of an Environmental. Assessment Form.—Part 2. o Impact on Land; o Impact on Plants and Animals; oImpact on Agricultural Land Resources; o Impact on Aesthetic Resources; o Impact on Open Space and Recreation; o Impact on Transportation; and o Impact on the Growth and Character of the Community or Neighborhood. The Environmental Impact Form — Part 2 is to be prepared to determine whether or not the potential environmental impacts are small to moderate or potentially large and whether,or not the impact can be mitigated by project change. 9 . Appendix A-2 SEQR Positive Declaration, Town of Southold Planning Board July 16, 2007 • PART 3 EV ALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS TRE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Lead Agency: Town of Southold Planning Board Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse; Chairperson Town of-Southold Planning Bdard Address: 54375:NYS Route 25 P.O:Box 1179 Southold;NY 11971 `Date: July 16, 2007 i This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review — SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Lave and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. Thi lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant im . ct on the environment. This determination provides a description of the proposed project andioutlines the considerations of the Board in making this determination: Title of Action: The Heritage at Cutchogue Cutchogue, New York . SEQR Status. Type 1 Location: The subject property lies in the Hamlet of Cutchogue,:Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. The.subject property consists of a vacant 4617-acre parcel located on the _ northwest comer of Griffmg Street and School House Lane, approximately 1;079 feet north of Main Road in Catchogue. The site is currently zoned Hamlet Density(=H)). SCTM No,: 1000-102=1-33;3 Determination of Significance Heritage at Cut chogue . ]tesidenflal Site Pian Application Description of the Proposed Action: Ths,proposed action requires residential site plan approval for the development of a Planned 55+ . Active Adult Community coiisisting.of 139 detached and attached dwellings. The development is proposing affordable and market rate homes. The market rate homes are approximately 2;000.: sq'ft. each and include a two:(2) car garage. The prof ectcontemplates 278 parking spaces for the residential units; 260 parking spaces are allocated in the gazagesof the market rate units; 18 off- ATeet parking spaces are allocated for theproposed affordable units. The proposed parcel is a vaunt 46.17 acre parcel in the Hamlet Density(ED) Zoning District locatedon the northwest corner of Griffing Street and School House Lane, approximately. 1,079 feet north,of Main Road in Cutchogue. Adjacent to the subject parcel are single-family residential properties to the west, farm andsingle-family residential properties to the north,farmproperty to the east and a mobile trailer park to the south. Th6 proposed action also includes a clubhouse complex containing an 8;840 sq. ft clubhouse, a 1,160 sq. ft.swimming pool, two 3,200 sq..ft. tennis courts; a 2,400 sq. ft. maintenance garage and gazebo. The clubhouse will consist of a community,room with a food'Preparation area for catered events; game room, exercise room,manager's office,locker room and cabana. The clubhouse complex includes 45 parking spaces, including 2 handicapped parking spaces. Additionally, the proposed clubhouse complex includes a 15' x 45' loading.dock and dumpster. 4. A>retwork consisting of 197;043 sq. ft. of manmade ponds and water circulation fountains is proposed to.serve as a natural drainage/stormw.ater collection system. These retention ponds are proposed to be used as water supply fox on-site landscape irrigation and water levels are to be maid.tailed-through the-use-of on-site wells..-Thaction_consists-0f 1,162,P22 square feet (27.676 acres)of landscaping, including the required'minimum 30' landscape buffer along thaproperty lines to the east and north and a 40'.landscape buffer along the western property line. The proposed aciion includes various other site improvements including road pavement, patio and sidewalk improvements. Theproposed action includes as ecurity guard booth/gateliouse.at the entrance of the community. Currently, the proposed action provides for a single entrance, including a.connection of Spur Road to the west with School House.Lane and Gn£f ng Street to the south. Additionally, there is a proposed eme p . p rgency'access road that connects to Bridle Lane. The proposed action includes individual and shared sanitary systems. .The proposed density and design will be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Additionally, a series of catch basins and wells are proposed throughout the site. Reasons Sunportine This Determination 1 The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining rmin ng Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCgR Part 617.7(c). The.proposed action has been evaluated l through review of the following materials: Page 2 of 12 Determination of Significance .. Heritage at.Cntchogue Residential Mte plan Applicatlon + Site plan, ERSAP, and yield map prepared by Nelson &Pope P • Architectural drawings and landscape plans prepared by Charles W. Kuehn, Architect • Part I and 11 of the Environmental Assessment Form(BAF) • Site plan application Traffic Impact Study and supplemental traffic informationaced re b P P y Nelson &Pope • Environmental Assessment Review prepared by Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc, • Cultural Resources Assessment prepared by Robert 7. Kalin(Archaeological Services Inc:) Independent site inspection • Various correspondence from. involved agencies . Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the Applicant, the Consultant,and Planning Staff and concerns made known to the Planning Board regarding potential impacts, Bag ed upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are,provided below. The narrative below correlates with Part 3 Evaluation of the Importance of Imjacts Form. 1. Impact on Land: _ Goristruction that will continue for more.than one year. The proposed action would be constructed over a three-year phase constmetion schedule. The work will include the removal of vegetation from 46.17 acres. A development in which construction occurs over.more than one construction season (usually_Spring, Sutniner and Fall)to complete sulijects the natural environment and coriirminity to . construction-related impacts. The impacts (erosion, pollution,noise, dust, traffic and safety) maybe significant. The anticipated construction, including construction schedule and duration, materials and storagelstaging area, water and sewer systems connections, proper handling of construction waste, hours of operation and construction vehicle routes should be further evaluated. The term of impacts will be short and are expected to occur over the construction term.. 5. _'fi6pact on Water: Public water is supplied to the Town of Southold by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA). However, the site-itself is not specifically connected to public water. The SCWA has not issued a Letter of Water Availability for.the action. The closest water main to the site is located on Depot Lane northeast of the property . - The main is served by the Suffolk County Water Authority s Evergreen Pump Station to the north and the State Route 25 transmission main via Bridge Lane and County Route 48. The.applicant proposes to connect public water to the proposed project by extending -� a distribution line from the Depof Lane transmission main, 786 feet along Depot Lane south, and 1,137 feet west along Schoolhouse Road to the site. The potential Iong tenn impacts of this prej st wi+H regard to water supply(including aubets on the Evergreen Pump Station) and water quality must be assessed as the Town is faced with a limited Page 3"of 12 Determination of significance Heritage at Cutchogne Residential Site Plan Application water supply. In addition the project must be assessed to the Suffolk County's Water SupplyPlan for the Town of Southold. ,The proposed project will require a Letter of Water Availability from Suffolk County Water Authority. Proposed action will adversely affect groundwater. Proposed action will use water in excess of A000 gallons per day. Proposed action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan(208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8)hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The site lies-within Groundwater Management Zone IV. The site is not served by public sewer. Sanitary disposal is proposed to be managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. - The total-proposed sant ary flow-for-the project is 2-1;b 15-gallons per.day:-The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). allowable flow is 22,625gallons per day. Consequently the proposal meets SCDHS Article 6 requirements,however, it is .� important to note that the properties located to the north and west of the site are served by ` private wells and impacts to groundwater, including subsurface directional flow must be evaluated. In addition,potential impacts to the shallow aquifer,the Suffolk County Water Authority's.Evergreen Pump Station and existing water supply infrastructure must also be evaluated Will Proposed Action.alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water. The action will result in the creation of impermeable surfaces where none exist. The. placement of fill has the.potental to change drainage patterns in the project area. 8. Iiiipacfon Plants and Animals: The proposed action may substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species. The proposed action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory wildlife species. - The proposed project will result in the clearing of(46.17 acres of early successional habitat, causing localized impacts to vegetation and wildlife. Clearing and development impacts to vegetation and wildlife.are cumulative and need to be taken into consideration. The loss.of vegetation and associated impacts would belong term and irreversible. The proposed action may affect threatened and endangered species. Before a determination can be made about the possibility of impact mitigation it must be �. determined if species exist.on-site, The applicant has not conducted an endangered and threatened species survey nor has provided a response from the New York State Natural Heritage Program specifying the presence ar absence of such species. If species exists on site, the potentialimpactsto such species could be significant or iarge.and further Page4of12 - - Determination of Significance Heritage at Cutchop,e Residential Site Plan Application edaluation is necessary. If species of concern are found to or on site, it may be possible to avoid the identified.areas through re-design of the project: 10-, Impact on Agricultural Land Resources: The parcel is comprised of Haven Loam(HaM 0 to 2 percent slopes Haven Loam(HaB) 2 to 6 percent slopes; Riverhead Sandy,Loam (RQ).3,to 8 percent slopes and Plymouth Loamy,Sand (PIC).8 to 15 percent slopes Dominant soil groups include Haven Loam and Riverhead S andy Loam Both Haven Loam and Riverhead Sandy Loam soils are well stated for crops. Haven Loam is a Tyoe I Aesicultural Soili If the action is approved the, loss of these soils would occur The loss would be long-term and irreversible 1111 Impact of Aesthetic Resources: Project components that will result in,the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. The proposed action may result in the permanent loss of aesthetic resources (successional, old field habitat and open space) important to the community. The potential impact is long tern and irreversible. Mitigation of impacts could include.the clustering of single _ family units.into multi-family units to create open space and maxinLring.vegetative j� buffers.along the perimeter of the property. 12 Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources:' Other: The project is located within a district of intensive pre-historic aboriginal habitation. The National Historic Site of Fort Corchaug as well as several other well documented prehistoric sites are located within a short distance to the parcel. The proposed action may impact a site of archeological importance. The New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NYS OPRHP)has not evaluated the proposed project to determine if it is within an archeological and historically sensitive area. On December 30, 2005 the applicant submitted a report entitled Ctilttiral Resources Assessment The Hamlet at Cutchoeue (July 1989)(Attachmeni B). The report recommends that "Further study in the form of subsurface testing should be conducted to: evaluate the potential....for the impact to both prehistoric and historic cultural evidence". Consequently, the presence or absence of archeological resources.on site is unknown and, further assessment is required: If the action will impact archeological/cultural resources, - it maybe possible-tore=design-the project to avoid-such areas: — --- - 13. Impact on Open Space and Recreations The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity, Amajor reduction of an open space important to-the community. Tl.. t� tL I 'A r . 1a proposed actionWom'resu m 4 .17 acres of _future recreational opportunity. The Joss is potentially significant, Iong term and irreversible. Further assessment is required.' Page 5of12 Determination of Significance Heritage at Cutchogde Residential Site Plan Application Mitigation.to reduce such impacts could include the redesign of the project and clustering of the single family units:into.multi-family units to create open space that could be used for public recreational use: Further,the proposed action would result in the permanent,-irreversible loss of 46.17 acres of future open space. The loss is potentially significant, long term and irreversible. Further assessment is required Mitigation to reduce such impacts could include the clustering of the single.family units into multi-family units to create open space and maximizing buffer widths along the perimeter of the parcel. 15.. Impact on Transportation: Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or.goods. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement from the subject parcel to nearby public streets due to.the lack of existing pedestrian infrastructure and the, proximity of the action.to the Cutchogue Hamlet Center. Proposed action will result in major traffic problems. Other: The applicantsubmitted a traffic analysis of the proposed:action entitled "Traffic Study The heritage of Cutchogue" (July.2606). The mitigation proposed in the report is invalid. The proposed use is expected to increase traffic generation upon full development of the site,as comp ared.to existing conditions. Due to the.inoreased traffic volumes and limited . mgresiand egress points from the site to primary and secondary.roadways, an increase in trip generation on the site may have a significant:or Targe impact on the area roadways. The applicant.submitted atraffic analysis of the proposed action entitled"Traffic Study The Heritage of Cutchogue"(July 2006) (Attachment Al The applicant hired Dunn Engineering Associates P.C. to perform a peer review of the traffic impact study. The peer review indicates that the study makes several mitigative assumptions to minimize impacts of traffic. Item 3, lines 6 through 9 states that"It should be noted that the results of the capacity analyses results:for the intersection of Main Road at Depot Lane and Main Road at Griffing Street indicate,that these two intersections are currently operating at less than desirable levels of service. At Depot Lane, the southbound approach to this intersection currently operates poorly, andtraffic generated by the project will result in an increase in the delays incurredby vehicles on this approach. The study assumes that a.traffic signal is to be_installed by_theldew Yark State Dep_arlanent_o£Traasp_ortation_(NYSDOT):at_this_ location;and that as a result the intersection will operate at improved level of service. As discussed further on this report, the NYSDOT has no plans to install this traffic signal at this location, The review concludes that"...based upon the information that the NYSDOT does not . anticipate the installation of this traffic signal the study's,assumption that sate-traffic and existing traffic will access Main Road.via.Depot Lane is not valid". Page 6 of 12 Determination of Significance Heritage at CWehogue Residential Site Plan Application Based upon the above, the mitigation proposed within the report is invalid. Further, urther; i bedause the access to the proposed project is restricted;it is the position of the Planning Board that the proposed project combined with otheYnearbyexisting developments may . create a cumulative impact on critical intersections.and a more detailed traffic impact study is warranted. Further,traffic modeling, based upon comparable communities of the type proposed that have been implemented on Long Island, should also be conducted. In addition,the following concerns have also been identified: 1. Page 4. The study fails to consider addressing the possibility of development(housing)) of the other Hamlet Business zoned parcels in proximity to the parcel in question: 2. Page 4. The study fails to qualify what level of impact or substantial degradation in Level Of Service(LOS)'is if the LOS from an F to F at an intersection results. 3. Page 6. The study fails to qualify the seasonal adjustment factors of 1.14%0 & 1.19%,the groups used and how they were.they established by the NYSDOT. The study is unclear if the seasonal adjustment factors are qualified to real traffic counts and land use representative of the locale. . 4. Page 6. The seasonal adjustment factors differ on a monthly basis,the study applied a 14% factor to the weekdays and a 19% factor to the weekend volumes;the selection of the factors by the NYSDOT is unexplained. It is unclear if the:factors.arerepresentative of the locale. 5. Page 7. Figure 3. The calculations could.not be duplicated at the intersection of Griffing and State Route 25 (using the traffic count data and the seasonal adjustment factor). 6. Page 8. The analysis of Table 3 indicates that "rear-end collisions may be an indication of coneested conditions or driver inattention and siippey/wet road conditions." Although the statement is made, no mitigation is proposed,which suggests that the congested conditions are acceptable at pre-build conditions and acceptable after-build conditions. The statement warrants further explanation: 7: Page 14. The study indicates that currently the Main Road and Depot -Lane intersection operates at a poor-level of service-(LOS F)-during the PM and Saturday peak hours due to heavy traffic volumeson Main Road. It can be expected that following the build out of 139 units, the LOS would continue to worsen. Appendix D. Capacity Analysis/Level of AbService Worksheets & Summary Table indicates that the level of service _ decreases in the Build Analysis 2007. The LOS at the southbound left turn currently operates at an F, following the Build Analysis the level of service Page 7 of 12 Determination of Significance Heritage:at Cutehogue Residential Site Plan Application againoperates of F. The decrease.of the LOS is a result of the increased vehicle trips in the area resulting from the proposed site plan. The significance of change relative to impacts from•a LOS F to F is unclear and should he further explained: 8. Page 15. Currently Main Road and.Grif6ng Street operates at as a LOS F and E in the PM and Saturday Peak Fours. Appendix A indicates that.the southbound approach operates at a LOS of F under current conditions and following Build Conditions. Again the significance of degradation at the intersection/impact is unclear and requires further evaluation\and or mttigntion:. 9. Page 16. The annual growth factor obtained from NYSDOT is 1.8%. The Planning Board questions if the growth factor takes into account land use and rate of development indicative of Eastern Long Island or the Town of Southold 10_ Page 20. The Planning Board rejects the modeling of trip generation for the proposed action to Elderly p p y Housing (detached)nationwide.traffic , - modeling criteria used in the Institute of Tratvmpoftadon Engineers (ITE). . Elderly housing(detached).is restricted to senior,citizens,and may contain. special services (medihal facilities) on-site.Additionally; in aDecember 11;2006 letter_to.the.Planning Board,the response to Comment 41 indicates that Land Use:251 Senior Adult'Housing-Detached statistical datawas used. The two documents conflict. The action is proposed as an "Active-Adult-Communit}�'.- T-he-P-lammng.-Boar-&'requesting.that real. data from a comparable use.(Active 55 and older condominium community) located on Eastern Long Island be used to base the study trip generation modeling. IL Page 20. Is the Alva peak hour used in the ITE Land Use Code for Elderly.. Housing (Detached)the same time as the AM peak hour used in the actual traffic count performed by Nelson&Pope(the same applies to PMpeak hour and Saturday peak hour)?. Would using different hours result in inaccurate data? . 12. Page 22. The 2007 Site Generated Weekday AM Traffic Volumes indicate that 6 vehicles will exit to Griffing Road and the State Road 25 . intersection, 3 vehicles would exit Spur Road and 9 vehicles would exit the site-viaSchoolhouseRoad-and-continue-to-the-County Road 48-andthe Depot Lane intersection. The vehicle trips seem low and routing unrealistic. The Planning Board questions the analysis and requests that. real data be obtained and used(where possible)to model the vehicle trips and routing. Page 8 of 12 Determination of Significance Heritage at Cutchogue Residential Site Plan Application 13. Pae3l. The g . study proposes mitigation(traffic control atDepot Road and Main Road). Mitigation of expected traffic impacts validates that the action may result in a potentially significant or large impact and.needs to be further addressed. As confamed with the NYSDOT the proposed above traffic control is not an option to mitigate.traffic impacts, Alternative mitigation of traffic.impacts must be evaluated and proposed, 14. It is the Planning Board's position that the study fails to analyze the impact of the vehicle trips from Highland/Crown Land and Schoolhouse using Spur Road (if it is opened) as a means to access downtown.Cutchogue and/or pass.through to Depot.Laue/C.R. 48 and NYS 25. 15. 116 traffic impacts if Spur Road is opened/not opened have not been adequately addressed relative to the NYS Route 25 & Griffing Avenue intersection. 16. Other access alternatives should be_considered. Such as, access directly from the proposed site to Depot Lane through the property to-the east. Based upon the above,.conceins and operations; the impact of increased traffic generation and �- the :abilify ofarea roadways to accommodate such traffic,vehicle access points (including i emergency) and circulation and routing must be further evaluated. 16: ;Impact on Energy: Proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or serve a major commercial or industrial use. The proposed project involves an increase in energy use. The increase in energy,use could be significant. Ini acts to local facilities should be a P analyzed. litigation.to reduce e ' . th impacts of energy consumption could include building homes P g to Energy Star and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEEDS) standards and/or a lying darks standards to lessen the impact PP g l o" skyr energy consumed on-site. 17. Noise and Odor Impact: Proposed action will produce operating noise. exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed action would remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. A'potential moderate-'to-large impact of(noise and dust) resulting from clearing of the parcel and construction activities,traffic and erosive forces (wind, rain-etc...).will occur ` to the adjacent community during the three-year phased-construction schedule. The anticipated construction, including construction schedule and duration,materials and . storage/stag _-ng reay water and sewer systems connections, proper handling of construction waste, hours of operation and truck routes should be further evaluated. Page 9 of 12 Determination of Signiiicanee Heritage at Cutchogue Residential Site Plan Application li Mitigation to lessen noise impacts could include the establishment of start and end tunes for all construction activity, using alternative construction or operational methods,. . equipment maintenance, selection of alternative equipment, physical barriers, siting of . . activitiesand by establishing greater setbacks. Mitigation ' g n dustimpacts could include the clustering of the single-family units into multi-family units to create open sace, max mng buer width and planting of buffers with dense vegetation along the perimeter of the parcel and implementing a phased clearing p Ian and planting of cover crops (grasses) followingthe clearin . of areas. 18: ;Impact on Public Health Apotential moderate to large, short term impact to the health of adjacent property owners from(noise and dust) could occur due to the clearing of the parcel,construction activities and traffic, Impacts to the surrounding community must be mitigated during the three- year phased construction schedule. Mitigation to reduce noiseimp acts could include the establishment of start and end times for all constructions activity. Mitigation to reduce dust inipacts could include the clustering of the.single family units into multi-family units to create open space, maximizing buffer width and planting buffers with dense vegetation along the perimeter of the parcel. J19 ;Impact on Growth and Character of Community or-Neighborhood: Proposed.Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. The site is currently vacant,undeveloped land.located m an area that contains a mix of . residential;agricultural-and-commercial land uses: The dominant land use inthe area is residential with developments:lodated to the north, southeast and west of the site. The Hamlet of Cutchogue Business Center is located directly south of the site.,The proposed application is generally consistent with the surrounding land uses. In February 1994, the parcel was part of a review of Hamlet Density Zoning in Southold Town. At that time, the Executive Summary stated "Due to its location just north of the hamlet's traditional center, this parcel, when developed, is likely to strengthen the hamlet" The subject site is zoned Hamlet Density(lir)District. The purpose of the IID Residential District,is to permit a mix of housing types and level of residential density appropriate to the areas in and around the major hamlet centers, particularly Mattituck, Cutchogue, Southold, Orient and the Village of Greenport. The district requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 sq.ft. with community water and 10,000 sq. ft.with community water and sewer. Lot coverage of 25% of the lot area is permitted with a rhimrnvm livable floorarea of uOsq ft-.per dwelling unit: Pursuant to Article XZ, Cluster Development of the Town of Southold:Town Code, there is no clustered open space:proposed in the site plan design, however, should the Planning Board consider a cluster site plan with,attached housing,_a smaller development area ( would be established resulting in clustered open space and/or.preservation of environmentally sensitive features. Page 10 of 12- . Determination of significance - . Heritage at Cutchogue Residential Site Plan Application Altho 0m,sigifieant.eonflicts.with-.land use or zoninQ,are not expected;the-project's complianooy3itll.thO.Town of Southold Town.Goalsand.planniiig studiesundertaken withinahe Towle,over.the past 20 years.must be f irther:evaluated, specifically those adopted after..1,994. Applicable planniu studies,are.listed below; (a) Parks and Recreation&Open Space Plan (1982) (b) MasterPlan Update, Background Studies(1984) (c) Master Plan Update (1985) (d) Town of Southold Comprehensive Plan(1985) (e) US/UK Stewardship Exchange Report (1991) (f) Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan(1992) (g) Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Report (1994) (h) Stewardship Task Force(1994). (i) Seaview Trails of the North Fork(199 5) (j) Peconic Estuary Program(1995) (k) Economic Development Plan(1997) (1) Southold Township Planning Initiates (1997) (m) Community Preservation Project Plan (1998) (n) County Route 48 Corridor,.Land Use Study(1999) — (o) Farm and Farmland Preservation Program: (1983-2002) (p) Southold Town.Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy(2000) (q) Water Supply Management&Watershed Protection Strategy(2000) (r) Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan(2001) (s) Blue Ribbon Commission for Rural Southold(2002) (t) " Town of Southold Gencric Environmental Impact Statement(2003) (u) Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(2005) (v) Town of Southold Hamlet Study(2005) (w) Community Preservation Project Plan(2006 Update) (x) The Long Island North Shore Heritage Area etc. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g Schools, Police, Fire etc.) On June 20, 2007,the Planning Board received a letter from me Cutchogue Fire District indicating that the`Board agrees with the placement of the 8 hydrants". However the access to the site has not been resolved and must be further evaluated. No response form the Southold Police Department has been received to date. The ability of the Cutchogue Fire Department to access the site, and the ability of the Southold Police to provide protection and timely response to the proposed development must be further evaluated. The site's unique proximity to the hamlet center, traffic concerns and loss of agricultural land maybe affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided inwhich �r to accurately assess significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. Anticipated adverse impacts do not appear to be minimised or mitigated to the Page 11 of 12 Determination of Signifl ance Heritage at Ctitchogue Residential Site Plan Application Ma'knaum extent ptacticable. Alternatives to tha proposed action that will reduce potential impacts.should be examined. , Fo tFuither Information Contact: 7erilynB. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board 54375 NYS Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11.971 Telephone:, (631) 765-1938: Page 12 of 12 Appendix A-3 Final Scope, Town of Southold Planning Board September 10, 2007 • I • ['5 FIl`IAL COPE FOR t ONM1LA5Ii#+1PAX't'STA.Y._13�F11T �,><a'>d�ts[ia9 �aEe p1.�n.�. Tca��xl bfi�-Ier�e��t Sj�sin�s�t3is�ict 7..4� G sn Str er}5eli Lam,TUd9i4fCat-chdpe Town 0z amth"Olt Suffolk C onncy,Now Volk fi r apt a €1 fiy: �LSDA&Poppe,VLL x'72 wilt wytruan ltnad m-rivillic,rtew YOA 11-14-7 (631)427-MOS 0.Box-it iq 54375 State RoW 25 �.ttts�ld, 1 York t1971 (b3Ij7&5.13 Dwe: Sqnwubw 10,.200 docAwamn sa Iiaw Sp pc a the iffues md aftalym to be included W hie -D rgft irbtar nt 1 a t e3tatt na {t } for the pingo Hdritft at�CUb*ggae premjeeL The e� prta� et it, to bye iocawd an a 44.16-apm pat jqcoW of the xt6z&�vest corner of Street had 8-drool xouaa Vie; awgm-mately j,ti79' fat wof Main d, Vutchop.e '�Mav od U IDIOM�eciflpa} tits wified as TA't , m.142-i � 3, I0.c l•in. the NMI et `.�' b �To gf�sthold N - - '_€jjt T%wsit % aff�xarMet?p ity(FAD) xag�ist� t. du ty .s7�t}t £eri at t re e pr'Djeet us a VEM he*.been re,,WTd* the Town of 30uftld PIMM—At Roses as Lftd Agmcy. fDr s+hnindstraiWA of the Me plan mview d as requiresitythe york StaWEnvironmental - raLit7 pt�ie� for a DEIS W caMoined in a Positive.L larattQ imued.by the Flatter DO I -16, 200,7_ 6ubt ac dy amt, t aAes Cuddy, submLined, a I) at the PiawdnS 11cord work: session art.duly 30, 2m. P'um-ant to SEQP., the Plate Boazd lccMdwftd SWpihg nd . alloltvetl for Ps"r-PaW4patiO4 through a ptfte mewwg Uj.AtWat 2% 2007 aad a0wed for a MW stat. ed until Somber 4,2097, Cwhments from b©th.the 8 copmg mecttnS aud v `t_ ommeat T14=04 wac..rt ed by the Planning load atminr aid iuris tlae l ictal Thmiatriastatian �d in cvnzancc with this ape gad the g-EQRA procEn za jotada t gsru�i�le � t� tve ttaput Ili �e tletsxi� �i1yg � by asavol�d *:tom IS�� �;r aav� � issue das �t3ir r�p�per - '£lam � bo: se but# �X11 , ar a aottigs aM tables ivill �I � 81e `eseet�„ix lap�rf �� disra;.�itrsts axe Sys ��t � irz � vl� �� `�' fwt t LmAy in or, 4r'ttal�R Lti.L3itCr]f1 - Memt,^ru 8arthe.ArsF,t afa aFmcnin ttrtrnt5act Matrmrn.f the& The r-O - { P pta erl prr�jeUt rsivclva3 t1s si ittt l.sit€ plan a iroval for deveJopmeial of.a pl,nn d ( a• i &rs ag�j relive Atlull Ct:?MiL3.ylli t3a2 stikig c f. 3 detached and alfa6bd- reqr erii€ d-,zy dirt% of :approximately 2.009+0 square fit {511 eR l ; grf .5 c uhhruse, i,i (} Sl s-whroning, Pool; tvv9. 3,200 SF [in i, cgtrrts, a 2,400 SF a-1a7j3temca €agW; a galebol- a ga t l ouSe; 322 Parki-19 SVices, of which 278 are assomated 4j1h cha i� x ct € dwtahi#s and 44 sr~ a-0odated with the elib ts: ardreer�irta ciitE_y, 19 _.043 SP . of.. t.taa-m�e mels to serve tsl dr g b t; attYigaicon systems; 1,10,{l4 8-P. MAIM acres) of jmdqeaping, aad } ious cthcr site-InIp svetnentrs inchiding road-pavtmpat, g urs and Sidewalk 10 �Sltill div nra strive I9Tnt3 The .desctistion of tl tr -pt3t tial sadverte impacts ofthe propwed project las been obt!aine$ m r19.e PI"IM's aed's 15ositive DQe14` iM Of My 16, 2-097. . �dd3Eitintt3 imlght iaiw p€xtent al in Pacts is provided in the Put 3 W whist was attae tl to the Ptssitiv0 Declaration These iss1105 are, rewUd its this Draft &supe. Tho Posit ve Declaration idenfficd t1a,�- follov6bg up-a ns for the -rminafitin of 8Wft ace, i tt vgWomed. action ray cattse a pot=tial sanificsnt advea-ae impact an waxer, .isnpaai t o t..pla[et� atad nirYit ,a ri ltirctil resource;faeatlietic t oumes,Mhecle ecal tcsources;traasparraitea and griDwEb and ltar ivt r of tixsit ty raid is f 3ibt>t3a toll t rdxehansi revle rk1Wi -oortdUtere8 ra cktzrminu the f tatsall fs oflhepsropnaw i6r- 3. TIM Votimdal s`titfpacxs to 4Ab tag •gtpww tar;Wface water quality or quantity, noise levels floorkagkwhing or sift&W". , The Propend activai WM allvw high a'gshy residential use in an anti wbie33 may Thot have Public Water and Pam Munity(gubliv)sevret; 2. The leant' ' arm dt tit � in 02MG Abri trip 9MMtims- W. jed twMr data an*,*£xir-awland t cats ,exWag siaTemtlW latj vses,ffic volumes.wd ivutAug lsaftm aria*O'4V-d'uVre4 and MM POWS to prittaasp and S=OZ3dnry rta 3. The.Pcfoirtial itnPeat Of Tbd r my or dewive On. ,of large quatintles of VaWntiou and: ft uu : Buba WW inf fezence wiffi tie Mov ent of any 7CA& rt itnA 2169mory fah yr s svws3i st l edvme IMPUto *4 OweWeel or endautgert�ti s-_ iss halal rir it re:en: . _ 4. t Sts' I b4itutof Omit � � � 1s . L � species;or attt>�si t�e5rt#itdve itt�ratc�ict natiitril:r�sttiaiMa. I'ht.PMPttae d salt 99 ai_feat iltt lned sad a idertgemd opteles. �bI pTO9poaed a sci masubstanttallp aftut asn_tfaeatt=ed mktnua-eu r<€. €es.. Irl sP-- 4. 31 a potfttird ha2ar&to hge"b lfh. 3. Tho "iotqnisxipaets OF a MIJO 3 ORI chmp in the vsea or intensity of us$, 6f Ignd if€elst&ng ti ltltPal (ittalt g t o lust of 5 1 agtlat€lftsr l seils)iea :app t o 2dgtttlaI _-. _. . ._ Trrcisi�s tastes taatty to ssrr�s'sfitfg fts�s. i 5. p ttt fly impuirt wA of alio abamtor or otsa3ity of mpmtgugc is ie Ali • � �eaetu��tar itf c�iid€it�t mx.:<�.as�eltlaorlt4 t� cr�`t'. +t s.lrr�nsal srlicva mai��sib�f rstizric ear ltistctie" `� # �`tui�irti�:*ctuaGsrrat3ire� F izr�r€ti-tanc y,Asi peaitid. 7. The atssrsAmeit Ora as Ac4m Atterftadw, - - 2 - - �3naR Scl)pr fue tl;p Win 34YiS[rel�imest�t ��l"+fiof'r aYk41f - - v .Rt ro» nr with tine isasie evrztct a17: fp 3 silEiurrfavz€�figs. s iiiaed szI Fat tD . h -f tier h IAGIC +lrfd.and ,grYAry - l.t.z t3 lid I d sYC�ikirar&-iFslitY Obj etava- ?,d.? + jecii>r �cyfi 4Yrojeet spnnynr IA-4 of the.Pr+co 1.2 Locati-in:and site consAtioin 1.3 �3njerto:esl3grrYtmdL:syt+v 1.3.i t7+r�i�i Six 1.� Y:r I:. ,2 Prt 33tg an.d DrmnW, i= A,=mg,Ra �}steadasx� Puking 1.3A xtary Db�wij azi.a.Water Supply 1.33 Site T-all�rVaig 40.d -� 1.4 Cans'trulcubi�>�aA ie s ea (� 1,4.t Opem i*R, sa �.d.2 t5ptrar� t. P t-and Aper*V*lg R—egidred 2. I+1ATf. 4StFEi } i3�NTi: Sf5i5tt R .1 Sxoib - 2.t•.7 l= g�©ts��3s l. Rp e5 €i%alta. 2.13 F; sed)wri#so#at?a Z.2,2 fkai,t �rt�s 22.3 i�sediti4 S i�` e�xtlaar an�1'44�a7. e 2-3:1 iy los 2.33 ArdioipatedIUVAM 2.8,3. ilfrL?3t;;tt14jt:1.[7F3 - 3.Si �Re#14�A:At+i �"[RO1F1:�`t1'+A:i.l 'rf$irG�,ri 3.1 - •�.� kx"4SdogCliaditi-dir3jx eelsl 3.13 ?Mposadhattgation 3A Lsnri USE't 7n arr x'J S 3.�.i Exi��ngicsass 3_�.z �tinipat€��p�ts_ - .�ierit' e 61 C:itteltii���rs - - - - T'ena7 Ses{iti Ysr�eJJi�r.��sRF'�trPnYtiLiA tal impact�#»at� eitg - , 3.8.2 Axtineygatditjttfi 3.33 3-4 }tT.�iSs_55Edil�t'6ei #t3i3 - - 3_4 Aestbefae Rt Groes'Opelt�pii�et�amuitinity � �t�eteN anti�'af3lie tiErrstSti 3.x.7 5xis iiaiitt*a s 3.4,2ti4V'Rt W- 3.4,3 PriposedMAitift 3. 04)ric amts r ss ola #csi R 3 yr s "�;�_t Fx3s ��aii�fiaas 15-2 AnAcipatediniparts 15.3 Pm ' av#idgtisn 4X tic U R-X-qUTRVPi isr s 44.3 Catneiaf;.Y& 4-2 Adverse Impiadis That Ctminiot Be Avoldtd 4.3 Trr-eveisIwO and J -bir common-legit Of R£CS U3tY•et 4.4srnYls-nt[iicingrsfsec#s 5.0 AITIANATOrs 5.l No Azdatf Uterimhtive 9.2 AlvernathsD691gn 6,6Fia 5.� ��t�tif Gail t}u�tity a>; �fsirr�nsitimn sistiti �d TtI'c.�ded As r*Txirvd udft S1<QYy the DMS will inazda a ststerment andevialuation of.potential ss'g•ific--sem adv`e a impacts at a lwml of detail that r l 'Fs •ho se, of t�� ian�actss and thy, reasonable ilkalffiou i of'Ch*- oaameme- Included axi:this evaluation mill be reasonably retate shM—t> aud lung-iWPant5, with other re4uiredsections ideuriSW i.D tbv Section.5.fl of tis.4caping deet, This "M6011 fafter describes the levd of, analysis and the typs of ansi�expeata with respect to tkte k&y IrviTOr lent i VB(-ts Of t project as outrm.ad in the P09ftive Dedarabm Eiteh major section is forot*red by s*a�ipt ua ofthe extent and quality of �.etic*I Mded tri gerfoaw fly.UVRIUMM Of each efthe trapaeted rtwou & b!-nMvticsa of the Med first L There-wUl ba ehifef dot efttcs site and appiicatift llWoxyo indodiing zoning. Fiifi,'i��Ie�t { �rt�Epmiz y�J%}�et�i�s y.. Snea"udc rtip�i�i�edprajec#iii flax�'Tc .�t*ats frzxstte.. - 3, POS+'41atiias F by th-t P.Meot win U Id cot. 9. Tho ob cti t of lba t i iqxmwrwijj b ineludt 3 rtaswxissr . 4 ruftl 5enya I*itis Ureir S„n't'rhawca 3ieT ftngt<st 3xst niec+r - 'fl. D u 71 t r�3us s a d az i3 SP Pf die ce iru�ztxty is cfiits zx}eet f�o zmms from thg,Tsmposed b?TPJi�t- FaaWiewrdS`e?et::x eugz _ MtC n i its iigss i +e r}E +�: lrxeai-s�a41 cLf S3tC,27x n axa{� ?kv,`�° iS€rsi'-tit- is�r ti h c9c'kvT is ft f itn f asu..xif `sta xrve��.Gn:cUares,_'rr .+e:c •Lrs s=ib die pr vid:t7-. ' as�.txi�xit btyck�iiti�ix�f�x.�3f+�g�ia��.[�hd��'ri�s:• t+�t�o=�et�?�ti�a�a,»df�uwiszr 1. l da bat f rtes icer ra€tTac a , t os� c : de � bags ,= 3ttrett3s � 'tazi� )%ls� pmpq� lv �tYmits ,=ft 2xldshk�3��vg 9.Ctas ssN# a 2rutas�t"u nt333, 3. The€ pfm assns ix f, tg with vitt aF nil -t` .vated>.E4xmttEit,'F�v3Y�li'811t 4xt� A�3H't�i�^p#�� d. tte�aiamga and pr cd•dt4anan_c SIM e€aati d wo.vi t cavatat and Fns- ” rovader?. 3: _ _ - _ -. '1. _ - 4� mist suint as P Ctha��rsCu.x�t�nttS`�.nfa�r�ieas�ostu�+3'�u �-SF i-.-, ...5'92{i1't}3i-4YS'9'15IId tfDSF7Cf.=Q11ti0I rckt+)aaaafor et?ttStract#oa and pe�#-�t�s�uc4intt�da�€�ta S. 'S'lze vsS-sjel .eem-5 pDints,ams Id ronawvY hivout wad(MfOrc lzirw aifv i'Win bl nAdentxf504 - 4.. Tt3 asisq ,y+sf ttn (e Mtiti bt di,+titi IMA -aacFx�uecZ f*aijald av ragi=ed fry a hr=4..Ic4n tj of . �arks`€ag.: �s{tanLS 31c�E trafjt3�t3. _ - - eiiaa�5Willbeideasti3ltd. 1. p" rXb €4fta'k'ivi trva�d�r�vjorx€i ' . t $ Imci>;iz a a'ts t#o-n !rf' uia sr�. jiYs. T atac+S :s+ xat MPPIY and propns>d ,. - -'�..Lzw.at�'listcdfi�area-fl�dbs,��sse ofvaater ss.�pigan�sazritsiy�>to �w 7,ttft rttatitrn on t'i3e typz, axnt3at and location of tarmdseagigg pwpPsod writ tje.ymvidtd e� v eti 7II't•'f51'n38[jaiet an n7aii33 F73Ai�*T I9ilCtrseAf3_i.6FL`tt �3 Rris.,St1An and 'f$3iumtActr 1611cr n 'atinl) and J. rat cvns m find a ofthe-situ Wfo berudtYBss 3. aa[d°�maaYsEti��,� �et � . Cemaretten uuffavm got,equttmn ttttivwy roam hours e£-rr rati+xn, oratteer:' . per ,.I��.�S�.trFuatattrd'�rst ttis�ar��is. {. Crrmdt3 t fsrn3 haportstt tx iautea tdsta� etuzratmdarrigae',Pra. - + ,r t Fa tw,xs6 0# smhm tmpnavaettalxrtiacn uyssitae . s€a cmR t d 4,� 4 s+n.dna f x#aiF, kWs=pe mAd Opm c mib&a dsctsf cc el tt� 2 uses k czprcted sf-vw;o= b aca m=d-£eosin% wifbifa'the aite; sft&OW zaf u_-e, h tensity azf use, ivtasttxer the Oita wx b i tti+att to ap irrt e+^et w, Pt.�3 t nt i3ec of$npivpees rz%n tsc]t vmioas n weekdays,vteekends anif t eapeuat 3t neti ; 4 iA w.vqecOd r 69iv�ds defi3 covtin 5_ Thw* a it g somvfcMofv-mav5.sniupeu Of Abe 7. FAOW t£ancvoi tMn ft 44KTRed am retaw ttr paakiog"rRkm and P&rmitsmadr4 rm.alq.IC$gi)�7 d t. *ialtrsw. ked *pitdrevie,&r 'W OLud Zrat-s zsf 5ulanissic s be thekad and fiwaJvcd aigac es - ]sme3 c"#c ror om# rn'Ff Tvv3.r �3�� stat fr:rpaca 5tuc en.t N&rZLlennntodlL rgxr 5`rt1;� ' t t s�slrazg axil r� a tl b �t4 u r,Ul Ndtmirits to rh,2 olkCwunly Sctl tiin'cy. 2. ] pact l� sails ui11 Ltiscu aed n AaO' of$tail c0,«,tTatim pll oEnt to the $ui'i'plk au- Svsv y taa,cd p t t}o�terse�a I�ztr# 0 psopusr_r,1a d, ttzq reomtm'jht ani+fipil tyke. nYtty 3 ltnpsr t O"OF of agriaultuxel SW4 llt o dUtInzid add mitig�tnrrrt e a�inEd hi.Tr #e�st6lt; Tim of md9til .;sail fbr contamiziatnss• #exbt 66c g#t:t tFts t id re st€xltt tton stlotxld be provtdel Wqtcr : raurs ! tae gnu ttl va€rx mato 3ettt MnC as rhAIMA'f atttw. krtic{b c t ftm suffvlk Com.ty SazRaey t-b sltail Tze S' re ietd; 2_ -n-ta th to oma sd s r in FLp deveteplhgtt locuuOtxs v,4 the sitz%-III be ��tee ain ci by sae of vn- ss"te sem bores . 3 7�xe t Yp�CY d di tint c f t xul�vatx�r lar basil on tr3*t4to14c in6erpolad rzn skill bo ide atificd 9 Exisa#tyg grnait,+ u�aaers}.nality�nalJ�taf ox,ait: eeat+=eLa, . 5. - n�w- t4or maiiabiu-ly, semdce prtzv;.iler:inti capaotty of systems s=ill be- tstablish- d throug' coaUMtit�sCAtigii vnih the wftr distnCL - - G, 1`tzz }dcafibn of pavate atail Rmbtsc tcllt tvitl e det iatt¢iteit, tvidii Veelf�t V A �t�zYeat '-��iatian_ 7. the cxpcc d tray et of tlxe proitxt,,,iEzn rasps 30 wsi¢t qualify z"hWl l I>c yin toeans o f zit zy di4* € cumplfttncc, {Y tt4ve$ r tztn pp atirn and regulator^;f rttiira^rrt m A usd i#t 1son ad1"sc=property enrolls stat tp co wata-�. 8. Agipkicalaltw sssfftil9c (Dann:.Dppa=nvezn of Health s vim (SCM-15) regulmiazas and r q'ilm- ums N.Vs31 bD idantitied,sad rias cuzlrttaatc�of b tctit% vnth $sass all be etv ated. t3. t~'a401staczns s!1`ptojeried saettaTy.fiow and cousbtmoytvi�S thY sevfza7te County S�tita t cod -win 21m be pxrMded: ' lfl. The shunz'c in t_tyti-logy of the site in tags of c4wantlly of M.ChO g- t AdBi cxlutitig and fMAR6 rias dittca�s Ali be estabbEhed a 3r€i nt0lt;dYttt€g$e$bad} is zeitac - i 13 't'lte bus Witt p¢ovi" cakuls<auns of prqs.cigxl.water crnMa€t for sacdn tse ep. .j w' P t3xr 'pmlsbsul and, jr, t3". with the SU#3'&05muty tW AntttOftr,INM gvah;a the ability to maw tbh pie d w 'd�# . 12 'MeavM104 of impt+=ablo sw`f'aee-�andplactraeut of iii)wig he WaImtsd in.IV-nw of prteutinI to r{3 drafnagaa:patWns i®.the grrogxi axes d imp2ai on dMinaige r WC—d to:sioEs Wit t 13. hf figaticva IMMOM which way xod tcp_gtote l-water: "iwpaCU.*41 be sdm6fled megelaf m-a-ntfrlttfe 1. Exisiow AWA. Wlftft AW1 be M'Vftttarfetf tiougli afl is; ei tion Of the .by a gziali-fied Malt i§tl�sm tx�dot=r use She utak i,witdli t8 ese;sCl dTsi t e at d r. r iitt tt ory of flk; and dna of euved attd expo *MA�e provi i-u Q- se'etian Of*a DEM . 7. b aAOfth,M-t d native pla-4ts,piano,std ftim of speeiea usw as eittilaag. e€4, ttar a ted,s z 1 ii 1xrr Vdth ot7.tbr prblecow stabs'} aid d9mifitaant habitat a€ § air ttr . alta vrc.r Of p to"rtie..vzilt be ii ommWd. no site.Wm n to . ra�ta� . Y � .. €an protested native glattt,.plant and arailW �t *Fis'Ct d m W.dugmd� fhicatm , spe>dsl.oollco , (or Wifl)Ox pzaat eiiv€sig t,sp and s fieant Lalritat srcass➢lt id be coadu and M' Sho nett m tficy arc h'kf-&to occur. 3: Iii htstttx Rmitagc Proum Vill be coamowd for cite Ere iTi&Mtetiran eanrxzs irg habitots,phat =A same spomm 4. J:pmpwt h liatritstu will las qfuspeeed ft&tlis sed Vmjjt t i;1y fa [MMA ECO1900alimpart to it s.. ,tad snimau. 5.. Gt irdatfve of toss of habitat*ih'G*.idOmtWltA 5 S ei� t s�r�s to: Mata wrO ttv"ideid4ed and li�sod orf"iaipleii entatioll dtdramitttxl. _. . _ ?3uaaan��auurccs 3`ratrr�prr-pian 1- p"to timet [hatar%+ -Ys#s ofthe traffic impar of the�.d v Jop Y Ott roadway - - FEeiizn,�rsf�rte#oglyc - �' . . �'iasol-;;sire tri?tU?careli'tn�riraa��ntnt�7eRast�4ncfa��9Y �� 2. ?iisrti xiii>s�lyst of IM VWoned plan acid lummal rva"Systgx.a>id a fi154 "ffiia imput mill. --�� �s,.��r`pg ire pra��€s1�*telupmnat-�axpp3 e�nss fha staa'roo� �rnaya f`_CG4El.2€iI Kzvxy data X41 W ahifli=J 0 PV.43blo frTual r ltfi nal gealc>sx.,, $.,ai1Y be eua51i 3"t�t, iu 5mi§0f tlty prow-ed izjzc. 4. .The`f tat3ae 3lnp mcz tWy mill anc1 C631c.dim of dato S4 TAicg.pl nn6d ro�dtvety jmp,p, scf,0q 5 and gillor c#evclatm- ttt% fiVid svrnFys 313kd co,snta cF�Xlsdmg tramp vaiummr estiwAtes Of t'u'two rafts :uli+i ies at Aly cs r f x sti ag aiixi fut re it#ti ralntttss trl idrJiUfc€Y bti and.fiif a of miliffrod rm-dway 3mw5tvrtnrnis and t1t�enrily reswpo*vaibk kriixi`tiztieg.4}im� i>st.�ri��tr3netr�. Tt e ! taelssedo5sgy Ss rks!—m%a5d l6tan. S. The ma;tudfaOsysiine000sgoradc- ,4 s'jgw 6fe-, fannt-fie,rowilma3and.tr> iodifio;, . ftmr rite pr ti fYt i t i i ardit crd Iie Noild Crira+Tlsoft(htura,t}ab�e cariniotis .fvetht«tai thelaPsnMN and x%ed7i rthe ' te oned cfifi:Ved - - p o'ptr�utJ< Exisi ng t uUct3a:ii�1 b aaasiysed vr�iag saascs aFty atusi d t$#ice vii iiss ie re.tset tl peals alarm a da&yeir axd Ado a tterry cd13e 6d rit rhs f67lttsc sg i€iteaacetiaiasc mabbi lead iNys Rmw2not luta ag,"-,f et. - NU519t Rma(Ck 4 )at Doptt L'Tze - 91•ttcr�FlaettoaciiytS7e5soi'faits IWO Rot#fes-fSRow<513tCrmnLaud.4.Arre. - - - - - = mair R.aad(NYS Rpat 25)at btinz3,_,7tmt - f.. 1'iic � 'i zi til („'ryitditios its# c ltleu v?i"13 cwnmist a'f. -x .r irlt c-s aitjnL 2e�l by 3i irxxsat T-F"rl 69tm to awom* for isaa€ca' iu population VX11 as pvlmud will= the scin(ty of(ho sh. Mar PT*-%P=U&g b the amt Vm tic iiim 1�y r-y Wn 7 taming snf€anrd ir..cluded in the evakmd=az ap Aa Lm t3. TtAg=VOkU CA ZC�.by fJW.propoftd prdjed WM be clditTfmg #1 iditg rrE cip gW rxti,n Arad Sar�> Fund &ides r#abtssemirCftLms_prcject 4=gai`hm aQMtro*t-WoBbnd CoWift todwxrn*oitis$a vli nes Aw the£ulna Dad t oWo&"Mpoftd d- prem. v: All mndy.inOttm B5PWM VrZf dmo bo asaf d atsiA2 MkiMY LU pac 1 ly fs{4i +}its.ap*iag 40 *0 abm&Aft Bald 1-QWCV'Y siVgl taaihig,3,aha}:tltir Wad tial ea3umes W 0Majtua:t of ( 0353- 31 eratral tadffituri rei iA VtmhpgiY*a i4a Dvad Psm7 est�ztawa l be cixmidtMdg t$Oirst tiafttc Wipiaeta�.ti3 ihsiawPoa45c1 opm 1Q, The 02lay volt asks•iso_fll:amznti Cita 16 apt. clODRRY WmtMW;Uhisiiw.Bcm3!d cams Cistad bal*w (In4odurg donwoo sm-tm)e i> #Altura hawd d 1c8y t; +moiob;• Wmh F LiV4.of met U*S hvft-s;tnaft.aw kft-imtia taffic Vammar eaicrrlaiw �t�tra3 ' s�i7'sfidvtm tu,1F e�isiedi �' ' cis of sg+eci�tc ini�vr�etikan.7t33;aactuat gta°�Si Fast;€tag+Ssi�iaadlsn data td'�vr raiore lat�l i peak tnadt eensisLanoy" il�c � .xu+liin� 1c. 9[g>3ni i$a�bdity ' tib or;dt {�' I s+P[rsoyxFatet `ble �sritya; 'P°�ttai irripacU'svi�t Asu#.mss'smut.fixe up�iaang uP�pnt Itsyii�and ecce tri d+3wrsatavea�iv�oe;37�at t_a�e{IiotiR ei�ttlt s sotrtfit)Aird{�tg S'#FsWR��S;aed I acces=s a1 �tres. 5t�cow wrard ilgOnPW zi ,by, obg)ofa#r a6 Ea+3x5et}}itsaJ.FE9sigC{1$e4 . '3513 l The Vii;'W r P iri aotsdfiin. (Pa&e 4}. t y€aii -t+)tpie, iwok lericd a£ actaxF Atmihti9.da�tadmlcns L-t-rel of SaWMC (LOS)is imstm 5'esnatfF to t at aft zt}#�an it s tpw.s 4). 3 3�ts. udyfaila in qw ifythe er i 2 fare 0tsi s or dr 1.19%,die&camps ns44 and bow dwy uIrofty mlmbl%Wby the NysDm- any iirtcie tlto a �1 r e f sM+pal ti to red taffiavaunt*and l a atof*m)p (P 'Q Y# Tic's d cYf€errrasA+artf q i ffisai jj I1eda1 evixaft �r€nnd a l `r��arao aH� v67i:rca�.itt$dtsls at �.'ctairs 6Ft�c�+tY' 7 ia�n�:p5ame?l, �isa>icieorii#Lsf�rxu��eti€trasgiadvuCi`tl�ioraSc.{i�age� 57Tbahtitiri apnld not I'a 4moanted at the%to3seetion eOfo difwg and SM Ttcittc 25(using. graft aumaat dm and Aim eemotwd atAwtmew ; : Rhe 7. 3) a�Yof�'abla�ti?dK :ilti�-'yea€�.x+d'ci+I!€�iin`a��a����aai>€i�caasi•1` - . OF d-dyer""' _im mid�'t i t�e Jilitiranglt ilyestafmacaIs' - _ }tesk4+ge at�irtclia�uc 77m;r13Wpe{ar zk273rxit�AVIrL`hTe Ptrttt fmpad$tatamcut - - rntt.c,i3v vtTtfgritlan isppvsed uharJr vnSests^„hat tRiS sottgt':ztedcattd�aysra arm atcptabte at ` _ prz-hu;td cEicnaci aceepfabia inter-lwuiid cos�dsRianc"T'IicEattn�t+ts+r.nts#Iit,6h4r Cdptattatirfit.(S'agP t?i) S: 7) thatOMAgX Gil ptin Road and D-Vvl l'Azon- rtex_ec[iwi pe;rat"k%4 a.pm} icvol of strvift(UTS P)v'wing t'oe F,t ma 5awMay}eat,,hoxns dvc to Tien y-trade v67avue$rte - I414)F..oad_ hearaeezpecratt:hatfgllowiagthe'buRttoxtaf13-1unit&&, oS ldcnrtttntie to w6r". Appcm&I7.Capacity AssalYdsfLev�lofSerVicc Workah:et�gi Z;vz -rabic .is[li-rales t$2x the Eerel oFst<tvdac dt-masci in thea zi d A rjalyais 2{ro The Lo at the sfiuhhbomdlef w-m4muendyoperataat=F,fbgry?ringlba.3is3ld-r> :;isihelaveloi�er�•ice. afieia operalcaat F The dmt-na of the LOS is-s Mutt of dm i lmased ve gicla Grips in the area Ts tlting f4xvm the p€upRsndsito pith. `1--h.aipi ycwYc4 of c#anpr relative Li masts tufa a LfJ5 F tb f isaatckwand sh4hid kezfixrtltar expl*etL (Fa96 14) - - g) CS>* ehtty l+didr RARd ehd O.rifFil-Z Stxftt.*Mabo at a LOS F and B in the FM and camrday . Fcakll?=-AFium t A t;.lipatea,aunt 01-1knid oho,opi izall gfts tf4,g eft:a f-06 of undue - - cSit�erric�nditinnaand#'nll6wt'tg1'iv3ld.=C:Unditioa�: Aggirt,�izsigssfttarsen;€_d�adatiQaax�u5,c interstv6046mp=is*Rocas asd Rquires fatxhur evaidarwM and m aaixigatiog. (Np 15) 9) Thearuaaal git gactvr obtained..frr3r h'7"SpLT is 9.8'✓a The.i'-tezmsgg$caard qu�ctir;ns i£tlie grv`lA fat l0r takes into RC(:OW lard ase andraft indicativeof EAST m bong IS -had c+r tl;e Term a€StSsttlno9d. !Fo �?6 :; 3 1 q) The Planning Board rcjccts tho modaling of trip gcitcr.$t6.f&r the,pmoposv$ctdom to Elderly HtmairgtraMdmodeling'critar au:cd[AIke lnnstiiiuteof3'mbVortaliun F,rgsneer(ITE). Eldedy itaysing(detWhevd).i5-x�Sl M to.seri+jr VUjr tstd-may cmat<+in - - - spepial aetvices(medical fa+7hfties)bit site.Ad6tionally.in ri Doi trr cr I I-.�Oos lcmdr tb cisc Pfi€ti=mg Beard,disc zz prose to Lom' tM indicates that LaW Lit 251 SerliorAd_nli Rmllsin, - IIEtaehed statialical cIate'ic`am us3. ' Esus documl'ttta cr�niet. `f&p asfior iS D?' asPd as ea - `1f-C£ii•e Adulx Crm[t�aar31w. Tlro1'lzpniag Btiard ig ragnexlag.ika!real:data Place r cc�spasalilc Vss(ACtive 55 and older¢andb3 ri nm-commra#y)lbcatea On Eamew Lima Islamlbe used m Erase the statly l fip genera*n.m4elillg;(page 70): - 1 I) Is t'hn SAM peeklioa$uw4 iti the 1'Ill Lt Ed Utm;COd.v.far Aldtdy Hvuauing(l7.tacirpd)'th*s m0 start at ft iritis pmkhmtf used @d.tba actual tea€6c commt pe'r£vtaed by WaJ�u u''e.Rcpt(tlie sash* appl s to PM peak how abdrSaWfday!pt jour'17 YJuttld aslatg tl'rfiete�tt f cSlrs result las taaevu€sledltia7 O�tlp2o) 12) The 2007 Sale meted TrV Uy AM T mfic Vohuves lance iaa_t 6 VOW401,Will er4t it 04flirg Roast and the 9tago Road Z5 lotmootSoA 3 VcWICS%*U%i exits Spbr R,oAd ffA 7 vshicles . _ _ s*ti;rtd nidi ssid ssa Sckaolhrrstse Fi+axl apt car6xvafe to ttj a G`ii>aity:3�at�.fig mut t�i}epot Lane - lnft mcdon. 7'.iteseldckatlpsstem.lbirt rottsra tthrealls'elc. Ttie1']att i�,gL�aaf tzirstlags Slee aatalyais grid tuts-t4ar•incl be•n6!arsrieit lived(where pbsssble)to model the vgWtIa ts1)is and xoufag (Fags 22) . . . 13).71Mstudy pttrpmr4>oIeigadcil*ai cpneiatiatDopot.Aaadw4maisiAmd). Madsotim of Mxpected emme ik p It vauda tss.gist the aoYtt3.xi:as � t In i , t3bn1. fe€ilE? t or i-ar e may Pa lly x�int R iaipactltad�E4dS t01rE farx3ierad-�resaF.di As pOmTrnae{l�%It141�'9+�`T1�T -7.`f3ie�€OIpQ9C1l Ei3GY'C - tra�CCOJAt7i1j'Ig aor�aptf[rnto i<tftigate rtairx�iatts. i�ITEd23&1N�i[3Y1F.f�a}IZ�L bfita:'�G}rt�1aetS .stttt30o ovalua*.ed anti pcypvgtxl. {{Prigs 311 - 14) It is t7te PFezrri�g 13'o�xd'saositioa[5�t 130 Y 6311att aualg2e zTie impact cttthc ve2 (e traps `tv'ai Id561 wzVCxmmj. itaattd 3*4*vw ndw Spur Road(Wit is ogcmo i)as a aiceng to ricins downtewrlLlt - - t�?.gusattd#atpasst>arangty'tti 1lcpotLaaa/CaR..?8 radP�X$25_ The ka�v idt;iat:ls if SPOT AW4®_OMMdt stat opined bane not beta aafieguatelp aaddressed, - ridaYivp�tlJn 33'FS Rowe inleraertit?ta. Ifs) other noctas atetmad1w c andA ill;comAddtgd,- Such as,access dirccdi front this propbsctl rile to DegK� Lam Mmab ft Property tY biota ll. Mi1igiatl(t0 'fit be prvpwsvd to afte-ss any, eipif ubt degratlnana, ire the levet of geevia€. Art eapUtg aiM of ft;sassb of M#llgaiM 12. Amdysis of pedeatt m tmmeeliulti acid Mo cmeat trim aitta to hffinlct cw+ica sail adjacent tltt�+trteaty. 11 Impaol arc Pte$in#casir wrmne tebflve to faitd use,i*in ihm I l¢t crutm_ 14. Emg=cyapo$tterapmr�womwasai t�of oSWditiummFiulraoft- 15 If-*r Ir:�a�is apeboA traffo-ttvalysia of Righlatd-md lt(21ttitoad-OW9Pouls 25)sad C�Fvvix iWd ahtl'Mak-Marti(1M Rmfe 25). 8 I 4 : ! - -fisFltegemt Cittthngize Jeulz¢fnr fit EhA rrtWa7'M1Althtsl l�s+tsat`i ihih`n=^p# f'mdt2c:Gnntrg. nde'lasar Tiila 4w'tion of fli D'S wilt '34sftibc etciatAg land use :±ri zoning sin iha subject nle and in 111c sansaund3ng area. .. 1; The exla•latg land use ebama zm of tlti'iSs un0 Sta.tfa'issadi;ag at•e7�vi4lt tt�tJ4#'cet.wdli ix(1cS�`.r1lzsrl + 2, ht zojling'wmh b applies to dtt 2it+1 anti the ami arithzn-j CCcA will be de3:7il xt<nd ni-ap7,d, and a dwraip&an of wiling rcgujAuns Farr fhe lsroj—'t site and mr-Ouilding ai'eIF Zoning sltal2.lae pravid. 3:., Utd ase..Pinta which PExU y is its twofcci site vnll ba evalw-md with�,mplratls-0A those jJislnS. adeptcd afar 1994, - StiittbeSd'1'osr;t SfEwar,3s3ilg I,'gsk lriisoe kepoL#{i S ty - - - - i'-'-. _ -Seavtaiv Tsris"t�ftltc I4*iz`?111'itt'k(197 } - - g ' PuniclsvtuaryPtngranl.(3725) �` � �eonr,�nicDlnttmEnti'la>#(�9�) Soatholst'Co-;�nship;'lsruuutgIn iattvs l79�J7j 1 C-Kn txounity Prt'sen ation.PtnjoctPiipi C.maratyRome$SGntr#doi,L�ncl0)-*auay(1954) ftm and FaimloW Frosravars`m Prognim(I 9133-2M) '.. • StiutymldTam zadFftm1_aodproti tiSRwegy9MO) •- 'Welor Supply ivlanagc=sest 4,wtmt Plvtecir_Dn St7astegy("moo) Semi:Soutbold C'ai:tidctr mAr%gcm-A Fiat(21001) Blne Pibbm ComminiinforRuyealkmihold( O2) - SoAdwild Ccrnpreh=dve Lt3filu nrnCtttva svaug§Eta ovs(2'6!13) - - E Local FPatelfYt nt 1,tevitaliaotlon!rri)tmn(2.005) - 3outboidi3aslet Stady(26o5) ' tv"pUtUtityl'refvatibtPritjettMan f2006'ltp3ttfe) 9 L rr g felt at133mti Muse PL ft Ami `i`nuatPsingTti�pslCaatidC�ltprcl5! iug Finn. '3's3 oAffop3.zblel{misipg.)+igt�a.gy� f �) Not&F**ligm[mbcnal 7xax�l hteedS.P;ss zit(',�.t)Ci2} - 4This 0=V3ftbftafiticaeve6Pi5Mt%tthftAuaOmAngOft tttMb&A{3 "c4.txL �C¢t>3 wave irtf sttitdoti ism)S coled h w i!1 assess tiie im"'a Z of 111e P�Posed astlao an.Saud vsg in Zumm& T1aa{ trot •�^^ iviu cmziev`nt to®e rvslt4tif itg.t;:lu"Omdmey or tlsa ptapasett KdOI#.WRIA peeve ling Au d'ive sitd acstiing:. Tbs avitipstsbflt'ty- of!Pte Psajxi cd - Firzi� itb. ^" land resew!!!be a4sE4sed ti_ 'PJ a cOn�It35MQC off dtc PMjeCr Wilh fabil rae plaas will.N e• lum d etidxliw 4Sstl.. 7: Pass ies its efs*tsa�be LtsLd io xtxitlg&Se poterilitd�xsd ise zoning Qi 1P3paeti;withxttPect to!anti p#zua WE bz PFUVW& . comma*Aarfudks and sorvftw 1. The eristfag lnt7mti.- serdces and tlac alti4 Ey of gltese agrvtcea to acunwmvdale tbg b,ed 1sza3bot will lie dmvAm. TUC serviecs ivelvdv "• ' + lice and Frnabulmw Sw�ioes; =. Mectaacal energy supply; 2. I i�est a�alyeis�in tlae I3 srs91 iiaelvde ctmsraltatolsr wsfls acrvlcE providers[fioaardinR exMing:dm*o.d forWvieea and capacity such lbut The DEIS vn'll objewively"ym the impact of the}imppsedadi6n otl Caam o fasaTwii'm imd SWvIces. 3. `lheDZ7S ru''t3 W b&dGt'Iiied'pro PrAotls of service d--mmd.w tj sup7i welt g t sc �rjen. 4, 'Me ecis in4€a me uMesift shell bo etch!psi: 4 t''ing!Soot Nor ttte Draft tt+a Ir951aNWII71 daixjagM statemeaft - ..�,� *a' g_eney ssmt a (Rafinirrxe, ponce aad fi 3 which aet, �tlte siM MnII. b� idzt.;tAtd e, CQat1)e2e=t IOV topes#with rtspP,t to coa snag �1� -J to s vve;#le silt^ n. C haagfs Mon:Md With the propkm�j pr'ojo�A-will be cvafzaetvd in tJ� a aF en,erg my -tisi:.e access, 7 practiml approscb will be taffeta to en llie,aPd aiftfl!and efficient ttteea.aicy nenict mWIT,12Ct io t�sit&t.�n 1�lsrza�isdFd ro t�se s?.te. - 7- .-i".` '.ltah# 7F�9t11fEtlan�tX�railga� vA OdhP c',EveliT� ant z43fAfiiZleTaiiY2t75 w7riC}I �3 i>t in addressing _ - eracrgenCy-.fw'ripw will be ivoujod' - 'd- R�Sitr`gat otl x[)r isrrergracy nervi c:E c.eas to ea sure f nt is psritirt ttirt#ng.as a F},e site +vt3i be ?ac3'itled,. r£ t; Ito:fzdenirires,O]1sm,j3ritelCdf}7trssfy G"lziiY€t1Y tm(IPtlic l�e+t7 - - _ - 1. E)datiug she,Md cern-Mtnikv aunt-.-anter will b-,14-DtiEO lead jtupays fo ctamr;xetruiY ebaizscl?e Wlrj be. - - - svnttrtttP..d, 2. The prWeet will rezdt iu a chat ;re itr the aetthedO elraraaler of the Stith dkm to vretnnva3 of existing e iamion, Iutpa*will be diaclosed arrl aniti atteu idcratiFtxi where easiaf<: "3: T2ae ope^a spas€rtovre of the slt;r:an$_ +xflf Ira se�atiitect_ 4. Th'cpro}t:ctyr71 rlf in Ch©Ions of npm epaca due to reiaboa'al of exilling x+egetatin IitgraGts will be dr` loses t and m tigasam identified vr3#re feasible; `- - i. TIM epis6lg.wise ebYiSi AIA-ioAt will be evaltaated to iftus of sinbisrr#nniser .ttsiid+ae Txcegitsir and coccitstitntiv els 'act�z. b. - Gons4r clrra xefitvslil as in tont, of MPM uction Schedule and€ltiratdalti, r4ateriall and storagelstaging area,water air.ti t&W'Ar systeaas xbnneatioras,Pro or hsrndUaof e(trt9tl�=istiblt tvzste;,ftntxt:afmt3areiieaai and truck roito M41 be cvatuat - - 7. apriiDeleo!be tba k*A.ctG tole fi d to e9I clave t .noise, dust, erosi¢n and 9 iaxcntak44 area_reee�a:a aPpileshls rssaisanee regada#iODS, spgjacahte pricy bs+rmght aMd s Fagu"--s' Phalieg of the fs%fit, staging amss, P r-8 arena, ap�aticm sreaar xttuatkh» ixetrrs, xnd.:eta#cd mitkgat1bh is ta=res to S - nduce omttvclieatiltrpaeu, (die ptdeutaFl IIois�aitit tt#rSt ciaUgact54{Ca�a"IIVCtiiaii a Ilted t!]clear FA rraAnictdwx acdcides and tragic will be as5oascd.. . - - 6. ttigatioa lest.tsnna of desigty bW-er pl"ting a6d crPM apnas ivifd be c mmined. d3�clirtao�fe+,�r.61 i�e5garczs' - ]. T7te ardaex>lt>gical seatxtrces'of fila sit$ +in'lt �¢addicsaed#ixougG n SYage IAtF�3 C:taltttral fa AAO eot COLA). IU sit* is wj*jri em area raf,tttijzostragQ %bstsft$ t-=sotttees u#ty a*rd tlaeee€tstt, a ;legs WIR is waked, tsaless dgaftmi g rA tttatar`llahca is doevmentsd to that w sibction of the ORR14P. Any iWli ,Tson w3tiOh mOy be z3ae'iled MU be j'&o j5e& tery dy SOutien� In adctt ort fb its.key TOOMMS, idebt$ied iti the pQaitive beclaratiuit, BEQRA idt des ether re =- -Otl S ing #ot.a O-OMPIM DEIS as tttalud 3 + *t dart l7 9 [5) }.. lvtitigajon MCOUM will be included with re€pea. to each lei icapaOE area as nested in Section 3.i1. t12t oati 5 t be�ttldlsrk acs tri if-flied in. seetio+3 9:0. File 1901jowi I?tber $ lithe Sectiot}s O td syaitatiaanP.MJJ be provided irl.thin DMS. i. Us* and f>wervatilon of Baergy Resourc Ube project Vill sOcregsb.etseray use wljlch sate be; algWrItt. iviitigatjort to rittiuce, the impacts 'Of e=gy Cons=ptimt coWd include btzildateg home- to Eat 8Y Star>and Lcad ersbip ift.Eat�� aha pA*q=,.Mtaj Designa.(LFMD) SWAdurda and/or allying desk sky ate#td in to lesser, tile gttipact at w.ow c surmed. these aspt ccs of alts pm—uct will be ex=iJ3Oa), . itaifii)9 Jvvd finpacde tl siMbe other petidtng bt vicinity, det"nsine prste'tatisl for '"acts of itupleramcDtah tta of pmltag@d project in comb en vridt others and di es e impwts). ftl l - F!"Htnr,{tcfnr s{,e:Rrhft E1111 miHmolm Imp�et Swn t.d2. 3. Adverse Itapaats Tbzt 01naygi Be Maid ;P:and'e btu#' # gta�g of Mon adversz 'dtxitnnlaetsW u spud$ dnsct lbedldiScos--scd previouSly w}i ch atm aOhlicipe ed to odor, whiaks irnaoi be ctnpfely liaiti*at�d) frt€vtssibte a�tl ,f1T FriEY3hle CQaYit3{itmae rt �{ Itd:s4un eg (FrrOVide tided" discussion .ot those natural and h m msawces Which WHI be Mranifted to zPdlor consumed by the pro�xxo£-d 3rrc���tj. S. q�*✓th inrtue# Agpee (Pravi brief discussion of idose aspects of the pinposm prajaet which tasiR or Tnay trtWur of contribute to fa turc grcvwtli in the ;9,4 Aj#e�a3ves io ts� tt3cd "A requir-s a,dasoiiptit n emdt cvaluatio of�o range cif reaso at ie cltmwalivcs tothe action shat are fMiblf, cuwRAwWng tht-*bjee-il'cs and' ca*iliiies Of the PrOlftl spotgng. As nomel 4t $E£ RA, `T e fle riptEon scat valuattor of aeit attemati e a*nll be ata 3 el of&bi3 sufficient to pemait a o©nrPaMtiw aste3sm`crrt a€the altem4—vcs disctvssedl't. The 1`oliorov%rtg alternatvves anri meilivrls of evaiva#ior are anti atoll; L No Ac$iirq Altetngf lv6(As'ternative�vhuei{y the site c�asns in its Gittsnt ecnditsati). ? Aiternat{ye'd s ert,it elttdit{y,but not tim ti d to ctus V of detedw Od aftneho units tr,deet t i arin f si oisM sparse and rnmmize vegeative to dffers al"s g the perimeter of ttau pdt p rte_ 3. keduoe exi----ill9tuu ttbcr dx tun f , 4. NAM ©t f€tll l+reseruation oftli�property, 3. ,4lttM-ativedtsa9iiAI wastMAfftioatm-mL t{ Appendix B Traffic Impact Study • • NN JMI�� H ;- N A. No'-VIE NELSC? PI 6 P-OpE a ENGI N.E fii3 S�'6 5•UA V-EYO'RS "' -�. � - -S72 WALT VVHTN.aP4 RaAR 4�V+� NY.I�7m 2IB cs�a)427 . Fade' 4�'i€B2ca . _ X6'65 .(6.�'I) w.w;ines TABLE OF CONTENTS �. PURPOSE OF REPORT..................................:.:......:.: :........................................................ 1 STUDY METHODOLOGY.......................................................................'.................::.:......4 EXISTINGCONDITION:.......................................................................................:............. 5 LandUse.................................................................................................................I.......... ..5 RoadwayNetwork.............................................................:................................................---.......................5 TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA.................................................................:................................ 7 AccidentMtory.........................:.........................:.:....................: 12 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION...::.......:.................:...............................................15 EXISTING CONDITION ANALYSIS...:.............................................................................16 NO BUILD CONDITION.....................................................................:....:..................:....... 19. TrafficGrowth.............................................................................................................. ...................... .......19 Other Planned Projects..........................................................................................................................•--.....20 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................................................24 SiteAccess.................................................................................................................................. ............24 Trip Distribution and Assignment...................................................................................... .........-....25 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS .........................................................................................33 ProposedMitigation.......................................................................................................................................37 CONCLUSION........................................ FIGURES Figure 1: Area Map .................................................. ........ 2 Figure 2: Location Map ........................................................................................ ... 3 ................. .......... .. Figure 3: 2007 Seasonally Adjusted Weekday AM Traffic Volumes ......:................................................ 9 Figure 4: 2007 Seasonally Adjusted Weekday PM Traffic Volumes...................................................... 10 Figure 5: 2007 Seasonally Adjusted Midday Saturday Traffic Volumes................................................ 11 Figure 6: 2009 No Build Weekday AM Traffic Volumes......................................................................21 Figure 7: 2009 No Build Weekday PM Traffic Volumes........................................................................22 Figure 8: 2009 No Build Midday Saturday Traffic Volumes.................................................................23 Figure 9: 2009 Site Generated Traffic Distribution...............................................................................26 Figure 10: 2009 Site Generated Weekday AM Traffic Volumes............................................................27 Figure 11: 2009 Site Generated Weekday PM Traffic Volumes ............................................................28 Figure 12: 2009 Site Generated Midday Saturday Traffic Volumes.......................................................29 Figure 13: 2009 Build Weekday AM Traffic Volumes..........................................................................30 Figure 14: 2009 Build Weekday PM Traffic Volumes ...........................-----------------------------------------------31 i1 Saturday TrafficLVclumes .. ...... ............. ........................ 3L Figure 15:2007 Build Midday Y � • : - *� � , .=L. . TA 7........ Table 1: Intersect'' GetimetrY•-••••••• -- b Severity, ............................................. Table 2: Accident Summary Y 13 Table 3:Accident Summary by Type of Collision....................................... .,r . 16 Condition Level of Service Summary .. Tab e 4:Exiatmg :µ _ slioirrYd z+estbsf5idwest afDep4tTae ° r 9�>'itfR t'sY3^M1+n�i^YS"/e•�.gµ•• A S'hRFI R yg'il`44� Iaae . _ �...•. ,.:_ .•..• •� we r...i .37 Table 10:Proposed Mitigation Level of Service Table................................... . . 1 APPENDIX AppWdix.A: Existing Traffic Volume 1 Appendix B: Trip Generation Appendix C: Level of Service Definitions sbeets&Summary Tables ' Appendix D: Capacity Analysis/Level of Service Wor L� r: r_ II r ' PURPOSE OF REPORT Nelson & Pope has investigated the potential traffic impacts'associated with a proposed senior residential development comprised of 139 condominiums. The site is currently zoned Hamlet Density (FID) Residential District. The 46.16 acre lot site is located on the north side of the Schoolhouse Road and Griffin Road intersection_ Figure 1 shows a general map of the area and Figure 2 the location of the site. This report summarizes. the results of a detailed investigation of the traffic impacts of the proposed residential development by reviewing the area's existing,roadway characteristics and traffic conditions, estimating the vehicular'Volume and pattern that the proposed development will generate during peak hours, and analyzing the effect of the additional volume on the surrounding roadway network: ' i ® I� -. . AREA MAP t . N �- ^,.._ 3- ,. •C " ? awaererc�: RPM - a _ r Long island S o u n d gtoak Gardiners IYtasd el er. Island Soared Southold Is nd Gordiners URIs say -� R7verheod Peconic B°y Get Es Hampton j r* Brookhaven eCO 1a Bay Sou amptan l C Shinnecock l Moriches Boy •. °y fes' L SITE LOCATION C NTgure 1: Area Map L 2 L • Al 7: Sacred Heart Cem /j RM • �, a 7 M3 utchogPO /tir pN 3 o. utcho e So r� \ 20, •qty Country .nfry 2 C b� q � SQLR('E_ CS(TS SouthUld 1997 ® STUDYINTERSECTIVNS Figure Location 'Qap STUDY METHODOLOGY The methodology used for this investigation consisted of a detailed review of existing land-use, roadway f and traffic conditions near the proposed site for the Existing Condition, the No Build Condition (future traffic conditions without the proposed development), and the Build Condition (future traffic conditions • with the proposed development). The Existing Condition was analyzed utilizing seasonally adjusted traffic volumes to represent the peak month o_ftheyeaand field geometry collected at the following intersections: 4 a�b5 -.4ry � � yp—° 4T%a—f1 Tk vvVY Iv1 El_oa (NYS^Route 25)R No'ttt Street ` Marra Road(NYS.Route 25),at`Gri ui Sfreef Main Road(NYS'Route 25) at Highland Road Main Road (NYS Route 25) at Crown Land Road Middle Road(CR 48) at Depot Lane Schoolhouse Road at Depot Lane The No Build Condition traffic volumes consist of the existing volumes adjusted by an annual growth factor to account for increases in population as well as proposed developments within the vicinity of the site. At the time this report was written, there were no other projects being planned in the immediate area I'I ( tliat were ,den -Li fica LThe traffic volumes generated by the proposed project were calculated and then added to the No Build Condition to determine the traffic volumes for the future Build Condition with the proposed development. The study intersections were then analyzed using Highway Capacity Softnare (HCS+) by applying the � existing field geometry signal timings, and the calculated traffic volumes to determine levels of service (LOS). 4 EXISTING CONDITION Laud Use 0 The site is a 46.16-acre vacant and wooded parcel -ined Hamlet Density (IID) Residential District situated n the north side f the Schoolhouse Road and Griffin Road intersection approximately 0 75 miles Guth -,f the Lune Island Rail R cL The site,is surrounded by fariuland anti rrsidenuaI homes. Roadway Network The fullowing is a list of roads that comprise the roadway network surrounding the te. The eeneral descriptions refer only to the sections Df the road that exist in the vicinity of the site. The cross-section of these roads may Bary further avk ay The AADT— kverage Annual Daily Traffic is provided for each road, where available from either New Y]rk State Department of Transportation (NYSDt)T) or the Suffolk County Department c f Public Works (SCDPW). NYfain Road (NPS Route 25) is under the jurisdiction A the NYSDOT and extends east-west across the i Town )f Southold and Suffolk County It has one travel lane in each direction, full shoulders, and a posted speed linut of 3 miles per hour The average amoral daily traffic volume is 11 173 vehicles per day (Source: NYSDOT 2004 Traffic Volume Report)_ North Street is a local residential road under Town Df Southold jwisdiction. It extends from NYS Route 25 to School House Road. It has one travel lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour Griffin Street is a local access road under Town of Southold jurisdiction. It extends north-south for short distance connecting Main Road with Schoolhouse Lane. Currently Griffin Street terminates at the south end of the proposed site. It has ane travel lane in each direction and a short landscaped median and turning lanes at the intersection with Main Road. The posted speed limit is 10 miles per hour Highland Road is a local residential road under Town of Southold jurisdiction. It has )De travel lane in each direction rnd a pc sted speed limit of 30 miles per hour Crown Land R)ad is a local residential road under Town if Southold jurisdiction. It extends from NYS Route 5 Ilighland Rc ad_ It has one travel lane in ch direction aad posted speed limit cf �0 miles per hour Middle Road (CR 48) is under SCDPW jurisdiction and provides a major east-west througnway acres Luc Town of Southold and into the Town of Riverhead where it changes to Sound Avenue. Within the study mea, the roadway is divided with a landscaped median and two travel lanes in each direction. Exclusive turning lanes are present at the study intersection. Middle Road has a posted speed linut of 55 miles per • hour The averaee annual daily traffic volume is 14,463 vehicles per day (source_ SCDPW 2004) Depot Lane islocated east of the site and is under Town of Southold jurisdiction. The roadwav extends north-south from Main Rcad/NYS Route 25 to CR 34/Oregon Road. Depot Lane has one travel lanein -- eae_lt dtechon andprovtd-s drrect'co�nsnction b„etweenMatnRoad (NYS>Route 25) and Middle Road - �..3nf�� �. vw� ��' � �•3C�w§..d"� 1 f i'�x« �.+a.-zs e `s.: _ �r � _.?.�i.:st Schanlhouse Road.rs undgr Town_of Southold3unsdiction and extends east west cn the south end of the site with its ca,,stern tefirdnus at Depot Lane and its western terminus at Griffin Street. It has one travel-lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 30 miles per how ' Spur Road is a local residential road undo Town of Southold jurisdiction. it extends east west for a short distance providing access to Highland Road and Crown Land Lane. Currently Spur Road terminates at the southwest portion of the proposed site. It has one travel lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour Table ] summarizes the lane configurations and traffic controls at the study intersections. I 6 Table 1: Intersection Geometry Intersection Approacb Lane Traffic Control Designation • EB L T Stop Control at Main Road (NYS Route 5) at Depot Lane �,rB TR Depot Lane Apprrach SB -R ---- -- EB LT -- stop Ccntr d at Main Rcad (-'IYS Route 5) at girth Strect WB TR N, rth Street .pproach SB LR _�---- i-- —- � EB LT —--— stop Control at I Main Road (NYS Route 25) at Griffin Street WB TR Gr ffin Street Approach SB LR Main Road (NYS Route 25) at Highland RB LT Stop Control at Road SB LR Highland Road Approach Main Road (NYS Route 25) at Crown Land EE,rBii TR Stop Control at Road SB LR Crown Land Road Approach EB L T T-R Grass Median on Middle Road Middle Road (CR 48) at Depot Lane WBB LTTRT R (CR 48) and Stop C ntrol at SB LTR Depot 1 ane Approaches EB LR i'ield at Schoolhouse Road at Depot Lane V13 IT Schoolhouse Rnad Appr cb SB TR Left lane;T 'through R Right lane U Left/through Iare;TR nrmugh,right lane Traffic Volume Data Turning movement volume counts were collected at the study intersections on Wednesday October �4, 2007 during the AM (7'00-9:00 AA4), and PM (4:00-6'00) peak periods, and on Saturday October 27 2007 during the Saturday midday (11:00 AM 2:00 PM) peak period_ The peak hour volumes at the study dentifiod neck hour factors were calculated for each intersection; and the traffic volumes were adjusted to account for seasonal variations. In Jrder to djust the traffic volumes to the weak month of the year seasonal adjustment factors for weekday and weekend were obtained from data contained in the 2006 NYSDOT Traffic Data Report. These seasonal adjustment factors are developed from NYSDI)T rontmuous data -ollccted for a three year period The continuous counter sites are grouped into three major factor Groups. Factor (iroup ?0 is characteristic of highways Gaming heavy commuter traffic with only a small variance if traffic throughout the year Factor Group 50 is :haracterized by large seasonal traffic ariatious ;nd F etor Group 40 Niu&vvays he btwcen tbcse r, , :heroes_ A col the o tion f the 2006 � SD( YC hraffic I to Report that contams the seasonal adjustment factors and the way they were established is included in Appendix A of this report. NYSDOT classified the sections of NYS Route 25 and Middle Road (CR48)in Southold as Factor Group ° and weekend 40 roadways. Seasonal adjustment factors of 1.22 (22%) and 1.20 (20%) for the weekday • factors for the month of October (month of counts) and month of from adjustment respectively calculates July (month with highest adjustment factor) were applied to the 7eekday and midday Saturday volumes to i adjusted the volumes to .the pear month of the.-year The seasonally adjusted existing weekday and 't W Saturday plc hour traffic po umes utilrze� heanalysls,azedeprcted m Figures 3, 4 and 5 and further r � t I i I 8 • adl ro N f PCIA 0! � O 41�p0� II A� a� Y �y Figure 3: 2007 Seasonally Adjusted Weekday AM Traffic Volnmes 9 y�s ahs X1691 ��e�, 99 Com' �y56,6 6 ryyg� 6,3il ` M PPS\ V. n�N° ti 1 0 P PO �Sf �iOO9 41 la' V 5 e � L_ M^W RGPD � r 1 \ �5Sri gq L Figure 4 2007 Seasonally Adjusted Weekday PM Traffic Volumes 10 r � a � Sri Sg1�_G�ay,�`s �9g GJ ml N' oW or � pyo �5 G �e Ski Figure 5: 2007 Seasonally Adjusted Midday Saturday Traffic Volumes �� 11 Accident History The:rnc)st recent available accident data, July 2004 through June 2007 in the vicinity of the site, was obtained from the New York State Department jf Transportation (NYSDOT). Table 2 ,imroanzes the accident data by location and severity of injury and Table 3 summarizes the type of collision. • Table 2. Accident Summary-by Severity Accident Severity Properly TOTAL Location. Fatality Injury' .. �_ Dada e_ � 14 - ax Depot Lane at Mtddle Road(CR48} s_— -_ __ _ _ _, Depot Lane between of Middle Road(CR48) and School House Road --- -- -- - — Depot Lane at School House Road -------- Depot __.Depot Lane between School House Road and Main Road (NYS 25) r ` Depot Iane at Main Road(NYS 25) Main Road (NYS 25)between Depot Lane and North Street ;ain Road NYS 25) Ar North Street — — - — - L_ Main Road i-x S 25)between North Street and Griffin Street — —-- — _-- — Main Road (NYS 25)at Grif an Street -- -- ---- -- ------ —- — — -— --- ( Main Road (NYS 25)between Griffin Street and Highland Road S 25 Main Road (NY ) at Highland Road_ ---- ----- -- — ----- -- Main Road (NYS 25)between Highland Road and Crown Land Road Main Road(NYS 5) at Crown land Road - Griffin Strcet benveen North Street and Main Road (NYS 25) g 9 18 L Total 0% 50% 504, 1000% I 12 Table 3: Accident Summary by Type of Collision Accident Type Location Right Rear Head Left Right Fixed Pad/ Backing Over Animal Other/ Total Angle End On Turn Turn Object Bicycle taking Unlmovm Depot Lane between Oregon Road and Middle ad CR 48 Depot Lane at Middle Road (CR48) 7 1 1 5 14 Depot Lane befween --- Middle Road(CR48)and School House Road Depot Lane at ------ ----- ---- ---- ---- 3chool House Road Depot Lane between — ---------- - School House Road and 1 1 Main Road(NYS 25) Depot Lane at Main Road(NYS 25) 1 1 2 blain Road(NYS 25) -- -------- --- — - — ---- - Between Depot Lane and iorth Street 'V`o' Street(NY Road S 25)at ---- — - ----- VW�oad(NYS 25) - - -- -- --- Setween North Street and 3riffin Street _ Main Road(NYS 25)at 3riffin Street Main Road(NYS 25) -- jetween'Griffin Street and Highland Road _ ..lain Road(NYS 25) at [3ighland Road Main Road(NYS 25) - ietween Highland Road ind Crown Land Road !Main Road(NYS 25) at -- --- — -------------- Crown Land Road 3riffin Street between ------ -- ------ --- ---- gorth Street and Main 1 1 RoadN(—YS 25�--- - -------------- 13 Accident Type ._. ., Right Rear Head Left " Right FixOther/ed Ped! Backing Over Animal Total Location Angle---End On Turn Tnrn Object Bi:' cle taking. Unknown F 8 l 0 0 . 0= 1. 0: 1 1 . 0 6 18 Total 44% 6% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 5% 6% 0% 330% 10((— A 0CA total of 18 accidents occurred within the study area during the 3-year analysis period. Half of the accidents involved injuries and half involved pioperty damage. There were no fatal accidents experienced in the vicinity of the site,within the,time period_ studied., The greatest number of accidents occurred at the inter9ectron of-CB 48 and Depot Lane (14 accrdents) ,A review of Table 3 indicates that excluding non � "t��oFtable c-'aszsT�the�lu>•-ahiy of the-accidents �S4%) mvolued rrgh4�angle�collistons, Mostof e 14 .�"�gl�a'+c�ci�f -(74aceid�nt� occ3u�ed atrfhe�tersechon o#`OR�48sand'De�ot Lane whrch may Fte cs �� ��1 bydnvers-failing-toyield:nghtof_way.,_, :.-. _._._ ._ -; i1 � � I� L LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION Level of service and capacity analyses for the study intersections were performed using Highway Capacity Software (HCS+) Release 5.21 prepared by the Federal Highway Administration. HCS+ is a series of computer programs strictly adhering to the guidelines set forth in Transportation Research Board(M) Special Report 209• Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 3rd Edition. HCM contains procedures and methodologies for estimating capacity and determining level of service for many transportation facilities and triodes including signalized and unsignalized intersections. The 3rd edition of this manual was updated in 2000 as Aghway Capacity Manual 2000. An intersection's level of service (LOS) describes its quality of traffic flow It ranges in grade from LOS A (relatively congestion-free)to LOS `F" (very congested). The level of service definition, as well as the threshold values for each level, varies according to whether the intersection is controlled by a signal or a stop sign.A brief description is given here and a more detailed definition is found in Appendix C. The flow at a two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersection is gauged in teams of LOS and capacity. The capacity of a controlled leg is based on the distribution of gaps in the major street traffic, driver judgment �- in selecting a gap, and the follow-up time required by each driver in.a queue. The LOS for a TWSC �- intersection is determined by the control-delay and is defined for each movement rather than for the overall • intersection. As with signalized intersections, HCS+ quantifies only the average control delay which is a function of the approach and the degree of saturation for any particular minor movement. The capacity of a signalized intersection is evaluated in terms of the ratio of demand flow rate to capacity (V/C ratio). The capacity for each approach represents the maximum rate of flow (for the subject approach)which may pass through the intersection under prevailing traffic, roadway and signal conditions. The level of service of a signalized intersection is evaluated on the basis of average control-delay measured in seconds per vehicle (sec/veh). The control-delay is calculated using an equation that combines the stopped-delay with the vehicle acceleration/decderation delay that is caused by the signalized intersection. 15 EXISTING CONDITION ANALYSIS The existing traffic volumes depicted in Figures 3 through 5 were used with the intersection geometry and traffic control to'determine-the existing capacity and LOS of the study intersections: T b1c_4 contains.tbe LOS summary for the Existing Condition calculated through the HCS+ software described previously The . detailed analysis worksheets are in Appendix D Table 4: Existing Condition Level of Service Summary AMPeakHour PMPealSHour Saturday Peak Hour Intersection Approach Mott '� " K "' L=OSIIelay,,reU1r�.ate-w. r.I„O, Dela3' ,2cXZI� '. a.A-, W8. -0 "ter.-�, �`�lvlartt�Il+oad` �- s _ 50 1 OBD - µ Main Road'(NYS 2517at North-Street SB- LR B 13-.7 0,00 D- 28.7 0.01.. C. 21.7 0.05 EB LT A 9.3 0.07 A 91 004 A 91 0.04 Main Road (NYS 25) at _. SBMp L D 32.5 0.26 D 31.2 0.14 E _ 372 0.37 Giffin Strect R B 13.4 0.10 B 13.5 009 B 13 I 0 t3 Main Road(NYS 25) at EB ` LT _A 8.8 001 A 8.9 0.01 A 8.6 000 Highland Road SB LR C 19.3 0.06 C 19.2 0.05 C 25 0 0.06 Ma n Road(NYS 25) at EB LT A 8.9 0.01 s A 8.8 0.01 A 8.8 0 01 Crown Land Road SB LR C 16.7 0.04 B 144 0.03 B 14.2 0 c EB L A 9 A 9.2 n n2 n 4 n l �WB _L A 9.5 0.08y A, 9.2 ' 004 A .__9 1 0.09 Middle Road(CR 48) at NB LT D 30.2 037 C 24 0.27 D 26.8 0.27 Depot Lane R B 11.5 0.12 B 10.9 007 B 10.9 0 10 SB LT D 25.2 0.11 C 21 4 0 04 �C 250 _ 0 11 R B 10.7 0.02 B 10.8 002 B 10.5 002 Schoolhouse Road at �NB s LT A 76 0.00 _ A 7.5 000 - A 7 7 _ 0.00 f Depot Lane EB LR B 10.2 0.06 A 9.9 0.06 B 104 0 08 IJotet: LOS Level of Service,Delay ndt/vehicle, V/C Volume/C¢p¢ciry R¢No Main Road at Depot Lane As sbown in the results contained in the table above, the eastbound left turn movement operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours. The southbound approach currently operates at LOS D during the morning peak hour and at LOS F during the PM and Saturday peak hours. It is not unexpected to see L results of LOS D E or F for traffic at the stop-controlled approach of an unsigpalized intersection with a 16 major roadway The availability of gaps in the traffic on the major roadway determines the level of delay that is assigned to the stop-controlled traffic. Higher volumes along major roadways result in fewer \_ available gaps. It should be notedthat the Town of Southold has recognized the poor LOS at the • southbound movement for this intersection and has requested the installation of a traffic signal from the NYSDOT Main Road at North Street The eastbound Main Road approach currently operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours. The southbound North Street approach currently operates at LOS B,D and C during the weekday morning, weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours respectively Main Road at Griffin Street The eastbound Main Road approach currently operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours. The southbound left-tum movement onto Main Road currently operates at LOS D during the morning and evening peak hours and at LOS E during the Saturday midday peak hour. The southbound right tum movement operates at LOS B during each of the analyzed peak hours. Main Road at MgMand Road The eastbound Main Road approach currently operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours �0and the southbound Highland Road approach currently operates at LOS B during each of the analyzed peak hours. Main Road at Crown Land Road The eastbound Main Road approach currently operates at LOS A during each of the analyzed peak hours. The southbound Crown Land Road approach currently operates at LOS C during the morning peak hour and at IAS B during the evening and Saturday midday peak hours. Middle Road at Depot Lane The eastbound and westbound left-tum movements from Middle Road operate at LOS A during all the analyzed peak hours. The Depot Lane northbound left and through movements operates at LOS D during the morning and Saturday midday peak hours and at LAS C during the evening peak hour. The Depot Lane southbound left and through movements operates at LOS D during the morning peak hour and at LOS C during the evening and Saturday midday peak hours. The Depot Lane northbound and southbound right tum movements operate at LOS B during each of the analyzed peak hours. �� 17 Schoolhouse Road at Depot Lane Schoolhouse.Road at Depot Lane,is controRgd, by a y eld sign,on,the eastbound approach however for anaiyss Yu.ycses,the r.gcthound approach,was.analyzed'as stop=controlled resulting'in LOS B-or better for all time periods. J ` C: L i 18 NO BUILD CONDITION Traffic conditions in the area will change even if the proposed project is not constructed. The future condition without the proposed project, known as the.No Build Condition, is developed by considering traffic associated with the following factors: Other planned projects, located near the study area, that have the potential to affect traffic patterns at the study intersections in this report. Ambient growth that stems from increases in population and from minor developments outside the project area. Traffic Growth The turning movement counts collected on Main Road and Middle Road in October 2005 and October 2007 were compared to determine an annual growth factor in the study area. The following Tables present the growth factors calculated from the counts. Table 5: Main Road(eastbound and westbound),west.of Depot Lane Time Period AM(7-9 An PM(4-6PM) Saturday(11-2PM Year of Count 2005 2007 2005 2007 2005 2007 Volumes 1736 1576 2150 1978 3636 3157 % increase/decrease in 5 traffic per year .0% -4.1% -6:8% Notes: =deoease,+=inaewe Table 6: Middle Road(eastbound and westbound) east of Depot Lane Time Period AM(7-9 AK PM(4-6PM) Saturday(11-2PM) Year of Count 2005 2007 2005 2007 2005 2007 Volumes 2212 2273 2494 2173 2905 2920 % increase/decrease in traffic per year +1.4% -6.7% +0.3% Notes: =deQease,+=increase A review of Tables 5 and 6 reveal that, the traffic volumes collected on Main Road in 2007 are less than those collected in 2005 during each of the time periods and the traffic volumes collected on Middle Road in 2007 are less than those collected in 2005 by 6.7% during the evening peak hour and are higher than those collected in 2005 by 1.4% during the morning peak hour and by 0.3% during the Saturday midday peak hour_ The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) calculated an annual growth factor 19 of 1 s°/a for the North Fork of Long Island utilizing data presented in the Long Island,Transportation Plan 2000 study (LITP2000). The 1.8%,annual growth factor is higher that growth factors calculated from the l 2005 and 2007 counts_ n-the stuclYraleP. In other to P"fo"n a_conservative analysis, the 1.8% growth factor -was applied to the seasonally adjusted existing traffic volumes at the study intersections for a period of 2 years in order to develop year 2009 No Build Condition volumes. Other-_Planned Projects Other Planned'Prolects?`ts a tern tbat refers to developments-locate..d„near the 9project site-that are _ axr j � � 1� CD��ch° �.��j�grstages T�a�ffi�g�n�aged by these p�ec�may stgmficantly, rte . �-- ,�]uen�e the'�b�pera`ttons of-`thestud3' m�'terser.tons and wo�ild not be represented m the fielt�datllecY � At the'ttme of the prepazazion of flus=report tlBeTown uIentafied one.project-being planned,in tl e rmmedlate_ area. The project is a 4-lot division of B' (Business) zoned land into approximately four: 4-acre lot's: Access is planned to be from Griffin Street just south of the Post Office and School House Road east of Un o Griffin Street iIo'x-ever it is anticipated that the competition of this planned project will be subseqent t the completion of the proposed proiect (2009) therefore :t was not included in rue No Build an•LLlysis. be 2009 No Build Cornb.,on :obames for each peak hour are illustrated in Figur-s o through r.. I L I i j 1- 20 � 4P if x3 . ryba a 6�9� 6 s,M1� GJ ate.B 4, bw ps a °p N �a P� yww s � O �O T a Z sages a� � F v m pk 4 -------------- Mgure 6: 2009 No Bw1d Weekday AM Traffic Volumes f 21 �Q \ g • sp � N � =z?-a-;fit-���' _,��.. �' a.,�'cam, `_ 2' �E _ ri'SL'e� w- v "�,�. 2a�e" �.�+.�se� ;ry �a-•x:. � 5xt ��.:,:, c O \ \ 5 i 9 � NN z v \ice 3 N" 1yv. I I I r —' Figure 7 2009 No Build Weekday PM Traffic Volumes r 22 i N 01 � A pOP� Gc l� �n 4 V � c 6y0 s d �o ra 695 616 Figure 8: 2009 No Build Midday Saturday Traffic Volumes �� 23 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Access t- As,depicted on the site plans prepared by Nelson & Pope, two means of access are proposed to serve the • residential development. A proposed access will intersect Schoolhouse Road directly opposite Griffin Street. This access will be stop-controlled and configured for all movements. The second access is provided via Spur DriveAvIrich currently terminates at the western boundary of the,site. An emergency access will be -- provided via a cbmie6tton to Bridle Lane Trrp Geheratton ,<= T - - As'regnested by the-Townof So"u`tho]d Planning Boa d'NeTsorr Pope`lias conducted-traffic counts,at:an age restricted residential development similar to the proposed development (Founders Village) located on Youngs Road in the Town of Southold. The data was collected by means of automatic traffic recorders placed on the exit and entrance dnveways of the Founders Village development for a period of one week. Founders Village contains 92 age-restricted residential condominium units. The site data indicates rates of 0 33 0.17 and 0.51 trips per unit during the weekday AM, PM and Saturday midday peak hours of the adjacent street respectively The trip generation estimates for the proposed development were based on the trip generation rates obtained from the counts conducted at Founders Village. The following table sumsarizes the trips anticipated to be generated by the proposed 139 age-restricted residential condominium units. The data collected at Founders Village is included in Appendix B Table 7 Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Land Use Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total �i Trip generation ates 0.15 0.19 0.34 008 0.09 0.17 017 0.24 0.51 (trips/unit) t_. 139 age stricted 21 26 47 11 13 24 38 33 71 condominium units Source. Traffic Comets ollected at Founders Village, Southold, NP As shown in Table 7 the proposed residential development is projected to generate 47 trips in the weekday ~ Alv1 peak hour (21 entering, 26 exiting), 24 trips in the weekday PM peak hour (I 1 entering, 13 exitma), and 71 trips in the Saturday midday peak hour (38 entering, 33 exiting). �I 24 Trip Distribution and Assignment The site-generated traffic volume was distributed and assigned to each movement at the study intersections based on the existing roadway and travel patterns. The nature of the proposed land uses and its associated travel patterns were considered as well. Figure 9 presents the trip distribution for the weekday AM, PM, and Saturday peak hours. Figures 10 through 12 depict the actual site-generated volumes for the respective peak hours. The site-generated volumes were then added to the No Build Condition volumes resulting in the Build Condition volumes shown in Figures 13 through 15 � I �� 25 \ \ �o 1ry��o 15'° f7b. 0\01 ir i .' EgOP f 4 h t r0 9� . /)S. O / /mootae k / 1 1 L. Figure 9: 2009 Site Generated Traffic Distribution 26 J N �ss G ! / �Zf � � J .y5P E "' 21 ENTER (26) EXIT r� )figure 10': 2009 Site Generated Weekday AM Traffic Volones �� 27 1 \� w -4I AW r - fi - t a P° 0 mR�'\ / (13j EXIT I ' b 31 A \ 3U 2� a \ Figure 11 2009 Site Generated Weekday PM Traffic Volumes 1 L — 28 . L N - ��`-ROIL Ot �9 NR Raw (/ �G \ �PR O C �R010 M � v 2 y � I 38 ENTER I (33) EXIT `10, i Cil V NA Figure 12: 2009 Site Generated Midday Saturday Ttaf is Volumes (� 29 > C J � R 9 " C F o Cll) I / CP P- yyl l_ i� Fiwre 13 2009 Build Weekday AM Traffic Volumes II 30 -- 66p1c� q4R 1 ,yam, �4? �1 N se O ��C poP° o V V 4s O)AJ `�f U N O'� Rol y g� bbw P �FC O py 1� N� L a= 4"g g p61 � p63O Figure 14; 2009 Build Weekday PM Traffic Volumes P 31 9a \ „ o Ery v� p / C^ �o o µis u 5g. kF1H 1 1 9 I 9 Fivure 15 2007 Build Midday Saturday Traffic Volumes 1 32 • TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS As stated previously the intersection capacity and level-of-service (LOS) analyses were based on the procedures and guidelines presented in the Bighway Capacity Manual (2000), published by the Transportation Research Board. The FHWA FTtghway Capacity Software Release 5.21 was used to analyze the study intersections and provide a LOS measurement of the intersection operations. The six classes'of LOS, ranging from LOS A(excellent) to F (worst), are defined in Appendix C. Each study intersection was analyzed for.the Existing, No Build, and Build Conditions. Table 8 illustrates the LOS summary for the study intersections and the site access at Griffin Street. Detailed capacity analysis worksheets and a detailed LOS summary table can be found in Appendix D Table 8:Level of Service Summary Jnsignalized AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peale Hour ntersections Condition Approach Movt LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Existing EB L A 94 0.08 A 9.5 0.05 A 94 0.06 Main Road SBLR_ D` 29.0 ! 0.47 F 51.4_ 0.62_ F 50.1_ 0.70 (NYS 25) No Build EB. L A 9.5 0.08 A 9.6 0.05 A 9.6 0.06 at Depot Lane SB_ LR D 32.1_ 0.51 _ F 61..4 0.69 F 61.6 0.77 Build EB L A 9.5 0.09 A 9.6 0.05 A 9.6 0.06 SB LR D 34.9 0.54 F 65.2 0.71 F 683 0.81 Existing EB LT A 9.2 0.00 A 9.1 0.00 A 9.2 0.00 Main Road SB LR B� 13.7 0.00 D 28.7 0.01 C 21.7 0.05_ (NYS 25) No Build EB LT A 9.3 0.00 A 9.1 0.00 A 9.3 0.00 at North Street SB LR B 14.0 0.00 D 30.4 0.01 C 22.8 0.06 Build EB LT A 9.3 0.00 ^� A 9.1 0.00 A'94 0.00 SB LR C 24.1 0.02 D 30.7 0.01 D 25.9 0.08 Existing EB LT A 93 0.07 A 91.1 0.04 A 9.1 0.04 SB L D 32.5 0.26 D 31.2 0.14 E 37.2 0.37 R B 13.4 0.10 B 13.5 0.08 B 13.7 0.13_ Main Road No Build EB LT A 9 4 0.08 A 9:2 0.04 A 9.2 0.04 (NYS 25) SB L E 35.8 0.29 D 33.7 0.16 E 413 0.41 at Griffin St R B 13.7 0.11 B 13.9 0.09 B 14.0 0.14 Build EB LT A 94 0.08 A 9.3 0.04 A 9.3 0.05 SB L E 374 0.32 D 34.2 0.17 E 443 0.44 R B 13.8 0.13 B 14.0 0.09 B 14.2 0.15 \�• 33 Table 9• Level of Service Suznmaty- Coutincted Existm EB LT A 8,8 0 01 A 8.9 001 A 86 0_00_ g - i o 0 OS C" 25.9' 0 06 SB LR C 9.3 06 C 25 Main Road (NYS 25) No Build EB LT A 8-9 001 A 900 0.01 A 8 6 0.01 at Highland Road S$ LR C 20.1 006______C 20 1 0 05 D 26.4.___11.06 • Build _ -OEBT LT A 8.9 0.01A ^ '90 0.01 A 87 001 SB LR C 19 6 0.07 C 197 005 C 23 6 007 EB LT A 8.99 0.00 A 8.8 001 A 8 8 0.01 Ex�shng _ _ � � `- Ma nRoad SB LR L 16 7 0.04 DI 144 0 03 B, 14,7- 003, A 8 9 0 Ol A =l Io Build - '"".""•-i- �or �f ��.r`� E� ;yT`�����k� s 9^Qr r OF�Q�.,-,.. A -r- R�`t.:.. -1'^*"' 'b^' ` '^"�� A..- 0.02 .e A y 9.0 ..� 0 04: .,__ STB L._ A- 9 S 0.08 A 91 0b4' A 9'f 0.09' AB LT D 302 0.37 C 24-5 0.27 D 26.8 0.27 R B 11.5 0.12 B 10.9 0.07 B 10.9 010 SB LT D 25 2 0 11 C 21 4 0.04 C 250 0 11 R_ 10 002 B 108 002 B 10.5 002 No Build EB L A 94 0 02 A 9 3 - 002 91 004 N'rB L 4 97 009 A 9.3 0.05 A 9.2 0 10 Middle Road NB LT E 35.9 0.43 D 26.1 0-29 D 28 7 029 (CR 48) R B 11.9 0.16 B 11 1 0.08 B 10.9 0.11 at Depot Lane SB LT D 27.6 0 11 C 22.2 0.04 D 264 0 13 R B 111 0 02 B 10.9 0-02 B 10.6 0.0 Build EB L - -A --9 02 A 9 9 002 9 1 0 C� WB L A 97 0 09 A 9.3 005 A 9 1 0 10 IB LT E 37.5 046 D 26.3 030 D 300 0 3 R B 12.0 016 B 11.1 0.08 B 110 011 SB LT D 7.9 Oil C 22.2 004 D 268 0 13 R B 11 1 0 02 B 10.9 002 B 10.6 002 Ex sting NB LT A 76 000 A 75 000 A 77 0.00 EB LR B 102 0.06 A 9-9 006 B 104 0.08 Schoolhouse Road No Build NB LT A 76 000 A 7.5 000 A 77 0-00 EB LR B 10.2 0.06 A 9-9 006 B 104 008 at Depot Lane Build NB LT A 7 6 0-01 A 7.5 000 S 77 001 EB LR B 10.4 0.08 A 100 007 B 107 Oil Site Access at Build EB LT A 7.3 000 A 7 3 0.00 A 7.3 001 Griffin SB LR A 8.9 002 A 8 7 001 a 8.9 002 St/Scboolhouse Rd LOS L,,I �_7 S,m,e,Delay &,,,,hide VAC=4olumelCapaciry R.ao ;4 • Main Road(NYS 25) at Depot Lane The southbound approach currently operates at LOS Fin the evening and Saturday midday peak hours. As. traffic increases due to background growth and project generated traffic volume the southbound approach will remain at a LOS F during the No Build and-Build Conditions. However, as shown in the table, the southbound approach delay will increase by 3.8 seconds and 6.7 seconds during the evening and Saturday midday peak hours respectively in the Build Condition when compared to the No Build Condition. It is our opinion that, the increase in delay due to the construction of the project is not significant; however, constructing a traffic signal at this intersection will alleviate the failing Levels of service. As previously stated, the Town of Southold has recognized the existing poor LOS for the southbound movement at this intersection and has requested the installation of a traffic signal from the NYSDOT We therefore recommend that, NYSDOT consider the installation of a traffic signal at this location. Main Road(NYS 25) at North Street Ager the completion of the proposed project, all the approach movements to the intersection of Main Road and North Street will continue to operate at No Build LOS except for the southbound North Street approach that changed from LOS B to C during the morning peak hour and from IAS C to D during the Saturday midday peak hours. Main Road(NYS 251 at Griffin Street �• The southbound left turn movement currently operates at LOS D during the morning and evening peak hours and at LO S E during the Saturday midday peak hour. As traffic increases due to background growth in 2009 this approach will operate at LOS E, LOS D and LOS E in their respective peak periods and will continue to operate at these levels once the project is constructed However, following the installation of a signal at the intersection of Main Road and Depot Lane, site traffic and existing traffic will most likely seek the signalized intersection to tum left and travel westbound on Main Road. This should alleviate delays at this intersection. Main Road(NYS 25) at Highland Road The southbound approach currently operates at LOS C during each of the analyzed peak hours and will continue to operate at these LOS once the project is constructed Main Road(NYS 25) at Crown Land Road The southbound approach currently operates at LOS C or better during the analyzed peak hours and will continue to operate at these LOS once the project is constructed • 35 Middle Road(CR 481 at Depot Lanc The northbound left turn movementwi" operate at:LOS E,LOS D and LOS D in the.-No Build,condition during the morning, evenrng and-Saturday midday peak hours,respectively Once the project is.constructed-, �'+ this movement will not experience any changes in LOS during any of the study time periods. Schoolhouse Road at Depot Lane As mentioned previously the eastbound approach is currently controlled by a yield sign but for the purposes Y_ p_ intersection currently operates at LOS A for' the of flus_study itWasanal zed as,a. sto control The northbo nd le iiSm� ae ,o�� �g movets T � will cotmueo operate at LOS �r�ander � &B UA&And$w1d Cpndrttons � '` .:•_� m+* "+" �, ,-�+�e�.�„ .tea s= `� � z s. � „-tea �::« 't ?"'✓ via-; . _ _ a_ � yr V r 36 • Proposed Mitigation Table 10 illustrates the LOS summary for the proposed mitigation measure at the intersection of Main Road (NYS Route 25),and Depot Lane: The resulting detailed capacity analysis worksheets for this measure can be found in Appendix D The results show that the signal proposed for the Main Road and Depot Lane intersection will result in an overall LOS B during all three peak hours. This,signal will serve traffic to and from the adjacent street network as well as the school located on Depot Lane_ Table 10: Proposed Mitigation Level of Service Table Main Road(NYS Route 25) and Depot Lane Intersection ConditionAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Operation Movt. LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay Vic LOS Delay V/C Unsignalized Build EB-L A 9.5 0.09 A 9.6 0.05 A 9.6 0.06 SB-LR D 34.9 0.54 F 65.2 0.71 F 683 0.81 Signalized Build with Overall B 14.5 0.63 B 15.4 0.64 B 15.4 0.66 Mitigation 37 CONCLUSION Neison & Pope ham .�--'Psti�ated.the`uoten'fial>traffic impacts. associated.wtlia residential development comprised of l39 age restricted condominiums on 46.16 acre lot zoned Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District situated on the north side of the Schoolhouse Road and Griffin Road intersection in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County The following is a summary of this investigation and the findings thereof 1_ The following irmtesections'were included in this study: - Nlam Road(NYS Route 2�)at`GnfTin Sheet _ � Main Road (NYS Route 25)�_a`tT�ghlarid=Road .'��� "" Main Road (NYS Route 25) af Crown LandRoad ;diddle Road(CR 48) at Depot Lane Schooihuusc Road nepot T ane 2. Existing peak hour traffic volumes were collected and a seasonal adjustment factor was applied to account for variations in monthly traffic volumes. Future No Build traffic volumes were determined — the existing volumes projected to year 2009 The traffic thus by applying an annual growth factor to proposal will generate was estimated and distributed to the study intersections and incorporated into the future Build Condition scenario. 3, The proposed senior housing development is projected to generate 43 trips in the weekday AM peak hour (21 entering, 26 exiting), 24 trips in the weekday PM peak hour (11 entering, 13 exiting), and 71 trips in the Saturday Peak hour peak hour (38 entering, 33 exiting). f- 4 As depicted on the site plans prepared by Nelson &Pope, two means of access are proposed to serve the residential development. A proposed access will intersect Schoolhouse Road directly Opposite Griffin Street. This access will be stop-controlled and configured for all movements. The second L access is provided via Spur Drive which currently terminates at the western boundary of the site. An emergency access will be provided via a connection to Bridle Lane. 5 Traffic impacts were created at the intersection of Main Road and Depot Lane. It is proposed to mstall a signal at Depot Lane and Main Road to mitigate these impacts. r 38 • I L i • THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE APPENDIX NOVEMBER 2007 N & P JOB NO. 00026 I Appendix A. Existing Traffic Volume Data r 7� AOVEMENTDATA ./ �C. ^„ POPE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ CROWN LAND ROAD PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHDGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL C1 Ho D-TuRN LEFT THHU RICHT RTOR TOTAL U-TuRH LEFT THRu RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-Tun" LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL 1 7:00 AM 0 1 67 0 0 68 0 0 99 2 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 - 0 2 171 7:15 AM : 0 0 66 0 0 66 0" 0 IZO 3 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 193 7:30 AM 0 2 84 0 0 86 0 0 82 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 170 7:45 AM 0 0 97 0 m0 97 0 0 85 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 ;_ OF r r0 ,- 0 `0 0 IBth,1 L1, BVV O 1' �yV 1`111' ?rin �IfY•!x� Oil ( �i.�h�1'V`EC Y11� 'I:.� Y! y4 Y..i 14 I� 1"'N, OiOu�fif 'tib ,'f IZp *oi`t-'H, �.w � �SxO ,uoW°•.aN 0:',Ad'i.P�l O' y�{412 f Q �. @ 0 .4�. ®`i �+rfl d w8" „ . >d,. 04irs � IQ' �6 •' ,' 70 � ,p011n�NOJ�,'i:�°5 I� 0 ?�' `� f�� d��h .y20�f� 2p0P 7 :PEAK HOUR: 8:00- 0 2 368 0 0 370 0 0 439 1 0 440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 9 819 9:00 AM PHF 0.01 CROWN LAND ROAD 9 6 3 MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) +— 445 439 4-- 440 2 JJJ 370 368 371 PEAK HOUR: 8:00-9:00 Aim L_� f___.. �---% �---' C-'-'� E---, ;" " ., � �:i CUA r• ..7 'U J } ^ Iw€ ra , Lr.._� �J a. �:y y i NEL9C]N 16 POPE TURNING MOVEMENT DATA F { p W, PROJECT TITjLE}+NEVI TCFF(OUE STS my r INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) ® HIGHLAND ROAD JURISDICTION i w F I F v DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY 1Kp I CL START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND wf F �lT SOUTNBOUNO TOTAL Hol U-TURN LEFT TNRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT TNRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT TNRU RIGHT RTO Lk T,RN RIGNTI RTOR TOTAL�, �^i+d u 0 0 0 0 . POA ` 7:00 AM 0 0 65 0 0 65 0 0 102 0 103 0 ,+1 , y I+ ,p 4 0 5 1�6 - 7:15 AM 0 0 66 0 0 66 0 p 64 1 91 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 6a ',0 0 0 6 140 7 SO AM 0 0 92 0 0 92 0 ' ta 1' i0 0 0 165 6 76 0 0 BB 0. 0 86 0 0 R 0 ., 0 0 J .,K rk + �+7 r,.0 0f t't'Ynr2 x �`aj' 6 7 45 AM 0 75 0 0 T 8 PI7Ja.f3 ptw 0 0 p 4 0 II �- BLOB PEAK HOUR: B:00- p 5 365 0 0 370 0 0 416 9 0 427 0 9:00 AM I°� , ' WO PHF HIGHLAND ROAD 1 #u 1 a a asG� E� f ' v IL IT n3 A P i 4 7 L MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) I z 9�1 I,r 4z7 /- 422 ? a R kr 370 365 P by l f i i I rr i' 2` ( �ts PEAK HOUR &00,z.9:00 AM 4 C•"- T)r, 7IOVEMENT DATA -�� POPE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ GRIFFIN STREET PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHDGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN START.TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND TOTAL Cl U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR 'TOTAL Hot 7:00 AM - 0 5 64 0 0 69 0 0 69 9 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 4- - 151 7:15 AM0 6 58 0 0 64 0 0 IIO 6 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8 0 14 194 7:30 AM 0 2 BO 0 0 82 0 0 74 13 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 9 178 745.AM 0 4 98 0 0 102 0 0 84 9 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 10 205 7. tilt ll r 7 �..v-� F '1` 0;, t v,. } t816 f ` . ,0, ON6'r Se dl 'i0�enlb; 9 Nr f 0,; r� r�0�,j�}r�gT�OA CIS,{IsOn S`c+'S 7 alu OihT a 4+h4`e rrCO w 6 a 4200`3$, 7 d .e 1'90 IIh{__a'gg%,Q�aMs� O�> �ab �Fz�01� N";7IOF�' 7°'�t" 0� " +ers"oOh: p�v8� ri�d `k + 0 . , 0 MB;�a. 0 +(�{i O'H,'�.,ala✓54�Sry5S�,0;C jjz�wll� hY2�G0 0; . ; b . ., .C�,`61NV' t0„k'S', II'"F,la' Oinkir� l2:*$anu.�}d e:,unsr 23lrw�s27,6ti#F:£4i PEAK OUR; 8:00- 0 46 332 0 0 378 O 0 395 70 0 465 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 34 0 66 909 9:00 AM PHF 0.03 GRIFFIN STREET 66 l 116 34 32 L+ MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) 70 f-- 429 1 395 465 46 J 378 332 ---' 364 ---� PEAK HOUR: 8:00-9:00 AM WeekdaVAM.xis f C 1 Ti, NELSON 16,:PQpE TURNING MOVEMENT DATA PROJECT TITf,�jr,1j1! r, Tfi I RR .. - INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) NORTH STREET JURISDICTION i D° °""�E DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY " cu NORTHBOUND �� SOUTHBOUND p TOTAL HOOF EASTBOUND WESTBOUND y7j�gU RIGHT RTOR TO °. +� START Tk1E 4 yp ^' U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LFFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LIFT TNRU RIGHT RTOR��•I, AU$ �Z 0 0 0 0',�vliq 167' 0 0 5:10 :. , 0 0 0 0 189: 0 00 0 0 0 p 7:00 AM 0 0 67 0 0 67 0 0 100 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 y. 0 0 19,9 D 122 I D IDD D 0 0 0 0 Y' 0 .i Q3 + 0 p I :202 75 7:15 AM 0 0 66 0 0 66 0 0 97 3 7 30 AM 0 0 99 0 0 99 ¢ Oi : a S "70 ' ° 77 p 92 6 ypK i s 19 + 1•W r �`' rrye x "�S, 745 AM 0 0 r tgM05 r Ok.rt:, I�v 0 .R.,^ . p Q� °O�'+tr" �I�T sAl Ove'' y} ' " � '� °'?� 79 { W"v r n �� '� .� I),� �`. L kI• ,�gipp 0• �.:,.< ..•.. 9t 0.; ,. .,.. ... . .a 0 0 846 PEAR HOUR: 8:00- 454 5 0 489 0 0 0 _ r 0 O;BO 9:00 AM O Z 404 0 0 406 0 � �, � '.� j-, {' S.... €' R i' NORTH STREET 7 =a wax I� 5th I MAIN Roao (NYS 25) 5 } l I J �-- 484 { 489 485 2 e � ` 406 404 I S a777� fi rllr. Ft>" gnN� f t �{ Fr. a , e�4 ° 'A �'' PEAK HOUR.: NJ 4 Tf�.,NOVEMENTDATA v POPE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ DEPOT LANE PROJECT TIME: HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN _ START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL CI U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT 'RTOR TOTAL H01 7:00 AM 0 10 44 0 0 54 0 0 68 5 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 9 0 14.. _..141 7.15 AM 0 3 53 0 0 56 0 0 98 7 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 D 15 176 7:30 AM 0 7 67 0 0 94 0 0 83 6 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 13 0 25 208 7:45 AM 0 12 92 0 0 104 0 0 95 10 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 14 0 24 233 7 Ills allomilAWID t" 9 Z. "R, I Now ft�52 0y 93 M'rdT 0-9k�;,:lt j5 ,i0'"'s { ;':14 F7 va i tp:;ss if ;"^i';" Jn^H fOt?3''b ,rt, t I �"t° #c�,_dt:Q �'Hg � p0 117.. 91 >N7d M1b4T�T-A. O� O �d05� 0.�° +.05 r1( i7r'1t117�1r 'la'^0'O�rN(ry�E�S206i y0`',s,+ �31r'�'{,'c06 .5a ��9 PEAK:00AM:00- 0 48 327 0 0 375 0 0 436 41 0 477 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 56 0 87 939 9:00 AM PHF 0.82 DEPOT LANE 87 1 89 56 31 r `* MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) L 41 +-- 492 436 4-- 477 48 375 —` 327 358 —� PEAH HDUR:8:00-9:00 AM NELSON 6'POPE i TURNING MOVEMENT DATA INTERSECTION: SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD @ DEPOT LANE PROJECT TITTLE: R, 7, CH7 UE � w � JURISDICTION'1+ DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY , cum WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND `< i I SOUTHBOUND y TOTAL, START TIME EASTBOUND y_ HOUR U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TDTAL U-TUPN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTORS YTTA11 � ¢ 'I NRU RIGHT. RT4R TOTAL�I:� ,tea` 7:00 Aft 0 3 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 X15 D 0(� r 17 S 0 24 s i�. 4,0 7:15 AM 0 4 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 a 110 � ¢ 0 v r 25 Z 0 27 42 7.30 AM 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 Q o 0 0 0 0 23 0 d 'u.�24$'e 0 0 25 2 0 27 60 I7: 745 AM 0 7 0 2 0 9 0 ! t "' 1 1 ^{v" ' u"•�gyr;�p I<^aY. �, ^ r� IBI •�r ! r + r h§ �.IF,u4:�p 'P ° ' ?f0 "�4'�'Qi'{Fy ,`0m. 4 AWE 0 'E' x A �;p. I`ItF,'+,p"H;`,:.0 '��y"• 4; f J �y" • t 140 s 20 00`�Ari',. Iq �' pry'"'°.H.'T3 •0 a*; {,+3 s�. . O P 4 *bq 6' 9Oil U�. � ,} �h� 1 f� kNP`W, _� 4iv B 21; .,.0 PEAR HOUR: 8:00- z n Qq 91 28 0 119 ( 231 9:00 AM 0 19 0 10 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 79 0 0 27,BS I v F, a PHF { kC tt DEPOT LANE � 1 119 198 4! "t�rzf, i0 28 91 "f ^$ 4-J1 SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD ji I x r� 32 19 S •T � f a k 10 ' ? !?3, � 5 *f �f p VTa, i 4 79 , s .. !.,r 1 N 101 [_ .PEAK HOUR B 00^Q X00 AM x 1 BS arf L_.• ` ' DEPOT LANE ve+�, 1a .P' 4V cc � Vo iOVEMENT DATA 'z� POPE INTERSECTION: MIDDLE ROAD (CR 48) @ DEPOT LANE PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL Cl U•7uAN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RICHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL HO. 7:00 AM 0 3 113 9 0 125 0 6 93 0 0 99 1 0 7 0 II 0 IB 0 1 I 0 0 2 244 7:15 AM• 0 2 156 12 0 170 0 12 104 1 0 117 0 11 4 5 0 20 0 0 2 2 0 4 311 7:30 AM' - 0 1 156 6 0 163 0 9 130 2 0 141 0 6 8 0 15 0 4 4 ' 0 9 52B � � ^ i. �_INS .\. 'r 0w��7. day„ gyp ���0, x5-r'0° n l`IS ,;K"".�`0 1 ISTv%`'LLe (Ici rO 2" ^yNr O !'4" ':7rg i^� 07 Ufa r'a"Oy l 7r i dyY" JIV .4 i` Oyr.'�.�<(41�°M1 i-..;�3,BJ �'^"r 12 0 � "R e: � �a ', ^ ' ' 4 V. '� ,� 1y, , cu ,'3F 5 ' )Ay.. kill, b�{ �. .9. ' Mh M,a $ . � �, + ay � � Qdr -_ �5 s .x °a' 9L _:Q1 ,�11 .�6 '. '4,� a�8a i^`E�,& 'Ft6,5h�'�.BIa ,..,i�a0a�..gNg, 6k.YS,w,:,^a�,rS 8:45 4M 0 3 100 14 0 117 0 9 116 2 0 127 0 12 4 IB 0 34 0 0 5 3 0 B 86 Ip PEAK HOUR: 7:45- 0 IO 536 41 0 587 0 53 555 4 0 612 0 35 Z6 68 0 129 0 1 13 II 0 25 1353 8:45 AM PHF 0.89 DEPOT LANE 25 T j 40 11 13 1 MIDDLE ROAD (CR 48) � ? G L 4 +- 601 1 �' 555 612 10 J 53 587 536 —' 605 --� C 0 r r4 35 26 68 107 1 5 j129 PEAK HOUR: 7:45-8:45 AM DEPOT LANE NELSON 6;!PORE eM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA ± }1 wPROJECT TITHE OGUE,.' i f .dS,rue ,ry.- •-• INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) CROWN LAND ROAD ,JURISDICTION b 7 DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY '" cuN WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND £I� - 9 J SOUTHBOUND TOTAL HOUR START TIME EASTBOUND to pd,.Ug GyTMPV RIGHY RTOR TGY�I �,.c'- "yT. U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGNT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN 11 LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LER THRU RIGHT RTOR ��AL eiX'I Z 0 0 0 119 ., 8 0 0 117 _ 0 400 PM+ 0 0 108 � 0 0 10 �S+a94 90 5:15 PM 0 0 105 0 0 105 D 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 ' ; 0^Tg kyH -'°'0' I O '-19A 8 106 0 0 91 0 0 91 0 0 1 1 0. 0 + 2tl4 5+M PM 0 2 104 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ; 5:45 Pm 0 0 0 0 0 q� ca y�x t 0! 6 0 10 c 967 PEAK HOUR: 4:15- 0 10 461 0 0 471 0 D 483 3 0 486 0 0 0 0 0 {}0 f; x �i 5:15 S 0;96 E' PHIF CROWN LAND ROAD " �# ail } a*e ri 1 10 :I � 4 i ffkf IA 8 2 1 OM _8 h L.� MAIN 1: (NYS 25) 3 tr, r tfskl '. �I 483 s $� 486 491 10 Rlv 471 461 ;Yyh Y i i bt x L' I �t x oma. PEAK HOUR 41545:15 PM k !E R T5 I'G'- . ,fOVEMENTDATA . NF�. j, POPE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ GRIFFIN STREET PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL CI U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL Hot ,:'W";" r 51tint r xa f ��rr 1.Srykv°,. r vp a'ks bry a vT �'z u q<rl „tz r04\ o-�40 siailIiAN yr 0.7,r S ns1Y5 a 7 2�9r`:: A U h, P! �✓F y:Ld:.. tT N"'�d'°'' ''a5 .1 rti W4 w f Y31 13 C 1 F Ual r-M1 c-. t r.JYny„rvf 1 ✓ (V to h 1 �` P � � N��„� I „ �. I �r I) u'�4 019 F��f>Ft'�� ;;03:� r I01 If :t 57t'{v y` *'S ^. wr`r 9:C� ' 0�'�' ,�.5�: ' �"20� , Ow.k_ tef0 ,t'?):�k.{Q;H��ip�, Ohn°.rkTy'0 y"[ p10�.Y;er' it a••Oirle'cl 9' t9,.1 V:i�rly3 �'I � 0 ��� TY r V �'p I^,w 1.t,R,1t4?l aS.3 �: G�'� 5'�a t5i 4a xln"� sT.- .•'l+kH�f F”,r'. .�,!'r I "TI t�S;i.\ + k f', �f '�� t r 11',� � m 1�.. P�f�', J. aR.B .6fly � v r. u, P4. _.xA'•,�,d >W.k.Alr.� 10/., it�t'7`&'3sS,wvQl.e � 4.R c. �w,� ul .rB,iO J,A.: -rL.Or. tt1+,9,1...Jr3.r 0 Ir:vO(d.e .b.,05.:s.n,.r,>S 0 P,_iT lJ 6t„�.�, tll"�9.>• 9r., aat e:2�0a FFa(A 5:00 PM 0 8 117 0 0 125 0 0 123 4 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 0 13 265 10 $:15 PM 0 3 102 0 0 105 0 0 105 4 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 6 ZZO 9, 5:30 PM 0 2 111 0 0 113 0 0 86 5 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 8 212 9� 5,45 PM 0 3 90 0 0 93 0 0 101 1 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 6 201 61 PEAK HOUR; 4:00- 0 24 451 0 0 475 0 0 469 38 0 507 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 27 0 44 1 1026 5:00 PM PHF 0.89 GRIFFIN STREET 44 1 1 62 27 17 '-' L' MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) 38 ,— 496 469 507 24 475 451 466 ---� PEAK HOUR: 4:00-5:00M Weekday PM.xls NELSON ,. POPE TURNING MOVEMENT DATA Y# a% PROJECT TITLE{ ,F;(tITa �GWOGUE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ NORTH STREET JURISDICTIPW 1 R00 ^ DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY r A y "— Ur .YI a < v SOUTHBOUND HOUR EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND ep.i ,TO�AL' START TIME ,, r �.; . .. ..�:.,•,vy� vCf�S'�". �.8��� t1Y J�Op RIGHT RTOR TDY�� U-TURN LEFT EAS Rwxi RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT Txnu Rlcxi RTOR 7auL U-TURN LEFT Txxu RIGHT RTOR t rA 4 �, � � }},+!���',�` ��QQ�f:�'tra4e0`�•��, 'Ayk .09 5 t 0 CF :a0 .OY�S4�74VtOj�F; all FO`!`,�'a.�a 51 1 01 0 135 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 i. 0 &fF4G6`PMI; ny50 tti �e lu,,�_ ; 6 r b. u+ 240 98 s:ooPn 0 0 116 0 0 Ib 0 0 ', ! 5:15 PM 0 0 113 0 0 IIS 0 0 125 W 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 A, 0 0 I , :a r p 2 0 2 244 97 5:3o PM 0 I 130 0 0 ISI 0 0 109 2 0 III 0 0 0 0 0 a;01,.P 92 4 5:45 PM 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 94 I 0 95 0 0 0 0 00�' 0 0 0 0 192� - PEAK HOUR:4:00- 7 0 530 0 0 0 0 0 g0 yj -:. s }} 0 0 0 1 1054 0 523 0 522 0 0 523 0 5:00 PM f- I 0:91 PHF , F� NORTH STREET 0 MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) 7 ; 1 rr � 530 523 -...4. ,p f i 523 522 „v" a 8 t� Mi:f F L,�� `. jC y• ld �N � � 4y�� �� LTJ , wa PEAK HOUR 4 09F5OO PM a u w a 4' T� IOVEMENTDATA �� _' � � POPE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ HIGHLAND ROAD PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL C U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRu RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL HO IBM r y..1:'Gi S r.�wX' p,iSFg2 +$: 19p' ? �+Q• ,DI 1 .�S •txy. b' . 1i. •rjv1. - 0 #05x11;0 ���}} ' yy,'�c wtA x .n ? a+ a l ', .�.� 0. a^ MV� � 0,5+•arfaee °�4e)l , 1e p-,..,srs O;�A, 11'I>f y0 A`:10iVly�vt'Xw i .'„,}� X10.. -rb0 1pa10 :tlr a.. i)11A�11'r�xVr2�'3�A}1 ' -5ti911ea, l,.f„ rk Ie9:+htY hS, 1 .- A'+ . 41 -Ok '� �+ 1A.,,x1 Oda 1,t.,p,Aii�/1}.,Of4 t22�'.4,ti< ',- 5:00 PM 0 0 118 0 0 118 0 0 121 3 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 244 5 5:15 PM 0 4 III 0 0 115 0 0 115 3 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 235 9 5:30 PM 0 0 129 0 0 129 0 0 94 1 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 226 9 5:45 PM 0 2 104 0 0 106 0 0 91 2 0 93 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 D 6 205 4 PEAK Haug: 4;00- 5:00 PM 0 4 459 0 0 463 0 0 496 10 0 506 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 10 979 PHF 0.93 HIGHLAND ROAD 10 T 1 4 5 5 +-i L+ MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) fo 501 496 506 4 463 —, 459 464 1 . 11 . PEAK HOUR: 4;00-5:00 FM W.FkH',PM.A,C > q i NELSON 6r POPE i td TURNING MOVEMENT DATA PROJECT TITLE:ii INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ DEPOT LANE JURISD1cTlON:iQ • '� ' DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY �t ,TOTAL Cu NORTHBOUND �F , ' iSOUTHBOUND TOTAL "Hou EASTBOUND WESTBOUND h� H ,"�R,11 RIGHT RTOR TOTgC°'F,-r� du START TIME R U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT R70R TOTAL U-TURN LEFT TNFU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U TueH LErr TNSU RICHT RTbR" 6fTAL�7 x` u{r�awG.:n; ,Sk I� 'fit, I R > `�`id��,{ "' k�; ..r�(^y, ' s 'QNI P i�.•�gg�urexgTj- ,. i d uer"Rxta•�Ak'�!�' '�'i�a.al h 0� � tl '® rt�� ...SA.Dy,9�'��'l��k 0 Pr �+ ' I 1 d tlgr zf65HOr +�2�F/. § S�YASi IIrY+yr'�,ydn�l 9� bbnjtz r .F.0 Y y 0 $ „ t01 E -p 7 0 12 254 10 ti7a45'sRM" lb 03k+,..-'i +ri"Jll '�fil�. - 4 0 13 2$I 10 5:00 PM 0 9 103 0 0 112 0 0 124 6 125 0 ' 0 0 0 0 S0 a ++ - 9"r 0 2`5,9 10 5d5 PM 0 14 99 0 0 113 0 0 116 9 16 0 27, ,;,", >S 4; 5:30 PM 0 10 114 0 0 124 0 0 95 13 0 LOB 0 0 0 0 0 i410 I 0, 0 I O 5:45 0 6 07 0 93 0 0 9 9 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 _ =tI c+,; + 1156 PEAR HOUR: 4:00- 0 29 491 0 0 527 0 0 504 43 0 547 -0 0 0 0 0 I0 y I. f� ^431[s 4- 40 0 B2 5:00 PM /` F ` O.86 e PHF DEPOT LANE p � te . ph r �. .I s 72 i t 40 42 ..irtiy a MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) t �za 43 4— 504: ^ i^,r 1� .547 544 rw 29 rX y 527 495 r� 1a+xIIS eye+ � I -y.. r>3s c j i n PEAK HOUR 4:0,000 'M Nia� ' 1� il'__�°' a � - d4.pis• - . / rIF ! �Ii IOVEMENTDATA POPE INTERSECTION: SCHOOL HOUSE. ROAD Cm. DEPOT LANE PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL Cu U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL HOU ;.4.9jg e, ,.v' t } 91 r.tV � ta@;- xwr , -ar R:vS' R v i" �s Gert t :1' �6 pA, :„ 1,Roll ^f IDI yr 4« i�IP�x'' 3x I` et' �i�s, � b k,,0 n41g r -p.,� r '�"`r i -+OI F f 0' 'r@. ?0 ,� tir. Y} :X-qq0 ci4z Od ,ddL 49yO 4x 4R10>. yy 04'm"` � Iaslgx22+0."°, s y., {10'� krSDZ3,e I1v1 CO,�r'1:.�16 7-vl,b :de 21Y ° i6d`•fv �l gMaxi�s ,i. dh4 y •� 1ti .q-a;ft f �i1.:,":',Itl• d ' ,t5,r4 4pW M`f .�1ST �{ I...cif 81 V'U.r:$1jltL t .p�dv��r0� gr�,t`t'0... t5i:t0,'. '�.fib, 7u� OI+v<MruE Is9; Fd !� 2vI X n.>}xd..r lur41 1 IN a .4.+fi. R.3.,,"R- i-''.1.:'v't t. 'u-,�,: ,ly e ,.:, Ox�iy,.t}I6L.yyiw.�0y,6;,p1 0{'c v{I� }I6-r 3 r xlvD•viby`"�9 'x 1 ....3,,'{r,�,. �� �9. �i:i�.p;'�Or �� !'� .,7r9N$dls '@, c4 va 14,. L'fg0„la,.h„OI b .;(��,, yx 0�.l .;r. O1}� Iv13.A.M O: 9P'axO9Axk tI3 .1� FaOI r. LsiF^I,B 6:00 PM 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 '0 2 17 0 0 19 0 0 12 1 0 13 36 15 5:15 PM 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 16 3 0 19 35 13 5:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 0 0 24 0 0 22 2 0 Z4 51 15 5:45 PM 0 4 0 Z 0 6 1 0 C 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 is 0 0 ZO 0 0 IB 2 0 20 L6 16 PEAK HOUR; 4:00- 0 21 0 8 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 67 0 0 69 0 0 73 9 0 82 160 5;00 PM PHF 0.73 DEPOT LANE e2 1 66 9 73 4-J1 SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD 4-- 11 1 21 J Z9 —' 6 1 2 67 VIG B1 TI 1 09 PEAK HOUR. 4.00.5.00 PM I DEPOT LANE __JIII Weekdav PM.xls y h , NELSON POPE TURNING MOVEMENT DATA INTERSECTION: TITLE. oN: MIDDLE ROAD (CR 48) @DEPOT LANE ' JURISDICTION nBIR001fi i ` DATE COLLECTED: 10/24/07 WEDNESDAY -'S , t - ¢ SOUTHBOUND TOTAL CUM WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND "I IrPy 4.., >HOUR START TIME EASTBOUND 3 ITNRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL 'Y"It'Uu U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR } 2 0 igg a:,i rl 1 I 0 3 '+ 293 4.00 PM 0 5 120 9 0 134 0 13 148 2 0 163 0 12 4 10 0 926 gi ' '� I' 41 7 126 F3 ; 415 PM 0 3 124 6FK0 133 0 2 130 0 0 132 0 erry, n a 2 yr 15w y � 15 � 127 i, yy L6. + I� D wal 9 £ W _ i 0.`' 0 0 0 r` 264 125 128 0 7 107 0 0 114 09 4 9 0 2 ; Sa ;0,.. 0 I 19B II'� 5:30 PM 0 6 114 B 0 B 2 5 0 15 x 0 :45 0 0 6 4 0 68 0 13 99 2 0 sq 7i ° 2f, 11 0 IB '. 1306 PEAR HOUR:L:30- 0 IS 543 32 0 590 0 31 571 2 0 604 0 44 II 39 0 i94 , ,4 v �$" £ 5 5:30 PM tlal .e. 0.97 PHF '.,I,;;; DEPOT LANE n+ a u Tf,. �11 s 18 1 g s 28 H + II 5 *I MIDDLE Rono (CR 48) t 2 571 ,k+; Ft""' 604 �— 626 J IS 3,1;. 554 590 543 32 '1 t`3r at t r4 44 II 39 9 �l"Y I ) iz �" :,. y#` 69 �, +, �'+, ?.� PEAK HOUR 4 30 5711 M .. i 94 } , DEPOT LANE n s , TL' ",NOVEMENTDATA d PAPE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ CROWN LAND ROAD PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/27/07 SATURDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL CD U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL HOU 11:00 AM 0 2 84 0 0 86 0 0 117 0 0 117 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 5 208 11:15 AM 0 0 112 0 0 II2 0 0 10B 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 222 11:50 AM 0 1 126 0 0 129 0 0 115 0 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244 �•, 1145 AM 0 2 110 �lri8{{}77;wV"{,•�i*:]�1�ks'.,�k..'�`.„g”•...�+_i.•A1 f @'YI.,�0,�.u4'Al1r�iWHt�lt�!G�-�a•�,,�gy.Y•'p�ISa•u62:.,d:,,.l,,d�:A�.,,+5xE"!�,.C6a��'1'§�I-��301::,251'�+r.y�•'",�.,"1<1r.,,'v.Q*.ay,ka pE0 4,`$,ty/NLy"6,•.7..r;yea't.,ri. 0 Ir.0U3EI�2943Bk4v:i,�•?r,2',.n.:i�,O,?�sYa;5J.£7..e''gxh+�x.�)00 rYm0o0 d-.ra„u;Yx,A i•.t': .,11I,,B 1 0 0O0 3'�1.e�'�.}'�:11203,'^.:9QB.'i.t4yx�A.<:s'k�r8M1;.:mr.�,•u„,''��e.}�O0p�i.,+'L sI'LF`"n�tl�.'3,,.ar.,7r t:�°„v{00p0.ix�.�F'.m•-3°�.:'.Z�+.mT'�xu,r`ka.i'.I l�"l 0000'���"*,&"�R,tIi.v4d1)r.",x`.�y•c.:D000',..c,�1"a'.:x,,:x,i0.d��_1`iep°1��,°x1•r p00b!�p`vvfirw..x�T)I!r.,wf:rx�'`•p'S7,t,p,0.o0.•r��h I�4� bj1k�'✓�,i,4CL�0O0 0Vrx'�r;r'i•4rki:,5:f4.l�r'o'hx,02,Av2vYai��iA1h a.l�X.x000v,•'aM..!ri•r!.3'1::.1,7 7f.a4s321 �00�.t,,e'p•:..eirv,lr1'i9 xa{.0r I 1lkf irt J24li`xy±!';d(Y�..'.va,�s,,u."�t4l'�y•r?i�$112 32'.�; r`avuA, 9Y99�6 9°,°y 0240 !35 :"I6 ' J�1:00 PM 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 226 97[fS 1:15 PM 0 3 134 0 0 137 0 0 79 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 217 9L 1:30 PM 0 1 120 0 0 121 0 0 92 1 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 i 0 2 216 W 8 PM D I IIb 0 0 II7 0 0 121 1 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 243 9C PEAK HOUR: 12:00- 1:00 PM 0 4 478 0 0 482 0 0 493 4 0 497 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 II 990 PHF 0.93 CROWN LAND ROAD 11 T 1 9 2 L+ MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) 4 �-^— 502 1 �' 493 497 4 •J 482 478 480 e' Saturdavxls NELSON PE 9 � x TURNING MOVEMENT DATA 1 P ' p;PIIT 9DHIQGU1 Er+" "" + INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ HIGHLAND ROAD PROJECT TITLE:' JURISDICTION;B.ROAt DATE COLLECTED: I0/27/07 SATURDAY CUM. WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND p. �-L SOUTHBOUND r!ATOT/L 'HOURL START TIME EASTBOUND ;° igy ; k II RIGHT RTOR TOTAL ry U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR fI�TgL"W� ^ aclC �' k tt M19. 0 0 0 0 0 , 3 0 5 '0 '.I6'4 Il:oO AM 0 0 69 0 0 69 0 0 68 2 0 90 0 Kw y 0; 0 3 ! 23�... IWO AM 0 5 112 0 0 117 0 0 100 3 0 III 0 0 0 0 0 ��U 0 6 'i 239, 11:30 AM 0 3 III 0 0 114 0 0 IIB 1 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 "0 �' P s a 4 0. 2 p 7 225 859 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 r0 ,;1 1 0 2 0 3 �` 4Z�i: 919 11:45 AM 0 103 0 0 104 0 0 109 5 14 1 `x43'+ 6 ^ -194: BB2 1200 PM 0 2 99 0 0 101 0 0 115 5 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 t 4 ps 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;0 F,ws i r p:i 2il AfYr ty 4 x'216 059 1215 PH 0 4 93 0 0 97 0 0 90 0 91 1230 PM 0 0 96 0 0 96 0 0 _109 77 0 116. 0 0 O n OhT 0 0 1Qr7 Y P I ur 4 896 ` 867 90, 90: 9..6 0 0 , 9116 :45 P 0 PEAK HOUR: 12:45— 0 4 503 0 0 507 0 0 401 7 0 408 0 0 0 1:45 PM PHF v r s ». HIGHLAND ROADt "'+' P' s` 1 jJ e 1 x 4 t p 4.--1 L-/ { nha I ' r q g{ ++ F 4 . Lr MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) 7 i t e 4 0. P a, 408 4 507 603 ""'` .Ay fF ri f4 + i 1 E Y ) V1. Vt n� aui !.v I '�: PEAK HDUR 12.45-1:45 PM 55 pt x£ pk� i i-. •i ds SSkfs�x !1 - I''kAG -„ ,y.. r •� 'ITS• .dOVEMENT DATA N*( \1,POPE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ GRIFFIN STREET PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHDGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/27/07 SATURDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL CU U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL HOW II:00 AM 0 6 78 0 0 84 0 0 100 22 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 16 0 29 235 11:15 AM 0 10 123 0 0 133 0 0 108 25 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 IS 0 30 296 100 AM 0 8 117 0 0 125 0 0 105 12 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 11 0 25 267 11:45 S1tY0 Ie°AtI[+,MIMS7'.L5.(000.a 10 9�rQ�,9 0109�l+91�'�r1 ti1vT'..0.•,11.7if',1,,0b0O010lS.{lI,.�95✓9 Q0 12r.0:,vE.i02 �+2Z179-? OOdO0.F2Nti.1�.ir1 k..iiYk.T4ui1tI131S6.$''949.d}.v( Obt+��5 SriEfro.`jaals3'4000..�}..�?n,}Ji..c.e,y'�lhef: O0O0 0, N t3Ya.3 v1I'1z,'000� 0� 0 �113 Iti>s LD:+Vd190Z1 '0�tQ0 t'l:riS1r�p'11Z22305' 1r;,n2�2iy71 Sk�eiAtlM 'IOElt ff v 113EN.1,%, r0 110 7hddg 12 1:00 PM 0 6 123 0 0 ) i73 0 0 0 9 0 6 0 15 237 10, 1:15 PM 0 18 137 0 0 I55 0 0 82 4 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 10 0 17 Z58 IDE 1:30 PM 0 4 131 0 0 135 0 0 117 14 0 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II 0 1 0 1 278 10: 1:45 PM 0 5 113 0 0 110 0 D IIS 16 0 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 10 259 10: PEAK 00Pm2:00- 0 25 456 0 0 484 0 0 r 1:00 PM 463 B4 0 547 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �2 0 49 0 101 1132 PHF 0.95 GRIFFIN STREET 101 I 1 IIZ 49 52 L4 MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) 84 +— 512 4-- 463 {— 547 to 484 456 --, 506 --� I N rtHn nuult: 1cOv-rw PP1 1, I Amb vdvrvle 1 u �-- z. NELSON 5,1:POF'E ias xI t TURNING MOVEMENT DATA r-a PROJECT TITLE:4,H@�,IYr f{�I CHOGUsE. INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) NORTH STREET JURISDICTION DATE COLLECTED: 10/27/07 SATURDAY CUM. 3 i SOUTHBOUND ,TOTgL NORTHBOUND i, HOURL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ` START TIME ❑-TURN LEFT TNRD RIGHT RTOR TOTAL LLTURN LEFT THRD RIGHT RTOR TOTAL LLTuRN LEFT TNRU RIGHT RTOR rTO�iAL 1 ,'L�F�Tj�'T,N[tu. RIGHT RTOR TOTAL ,. v q:- � 2 0 2 '' 227 II:00 AM 0 2 91 0 0 93 0 0 132 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. i 0 I x.259 11:15 AM 0 1 125 0 0 IN 0 0 127 2 0 129 0 0 F+ +0#a «-+'TO I 0 4 'L X258 %1 7 0 I 0 1 '2fi1 100`. 11:30 AM 0 0 134 0 0 134 0 0 II9 I 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 �0 A p 11:45 AM 0 1 124,..,.. 0 ..,.0" ,125 s..:0. e Oa ,pl33 sf2jn'ew'.40ir* y�35"l,.a x� w y0'�gi.&50s m. , Q' �f .Qi�n� 4'kn 0 'h�^ x+rtr)'r�t,q*'rr`ZiIIr `c."^ryg� g�i A.2 f2�r�2 ,7 .,. 103` 103: 106( wv��n+`y' t V ck5pn � r ;7.v �;:a.I�L°'rt l0 t,?,.•CF 'u 13,1 .vfl r Q. 11p�i12C114 i°"1� "� '. r�r�.�,. �¢jj, �'1exdJ<' " e,,0� xlf-Jdi a� ,�0{,� ' .•r..,. e..��yyr,. ,.CT .t,. fr4 •k. I i � 1;�,� 0550-,V, t+ J werAO ,k+.Tr„0 n Fi .: 'F h +^„r:., :, N Wil.., rxi.: u.PY:57 a"• 3T k} a0 t .'h`. 9a;r.�gOR�Yi dG n.�i„� .:ti?0'.€�'3+`i 4� r.g0'+ tr.r,5•a. r'' Ib. .. y�,, R �"E+0�7 '�'id.rrr1261ArS.N Os� ;,aS`T^H26%S�'w' � 1'p µ � t�ye'VSFr�+Fr, +�,'_- �f7iI tOTi1 r.0..,fh.:0. a0 e . .bra F �. ({ t:4$.P^ '12.A51PMnu"nr *r0 - 1JSL' > -,O itra-rn0 "�'a 156-ft�i.%0•sw 0 1TrA.FArR40':k x',pl Oa d�LII47ff7x li' a �! {.', 0,. I 0 2 ..247 1108 1:00 PM 0 I 133 0 0 134 0 0 109 2 0 III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 241 108 ITIS PM 0 3 150 0 0 153 0 0 87 1 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 i0 i} - Ov p 2 ,',294. 1081 1:30 PM 0 II 135 0 0 146 0 0 135 1 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 hyO r r 0 0 0 1,; 245 10' 0 12 0 0 0 0 1:45 PM 0 0 122 O 0 I 0 0 121 �1y¢ �{ it p- 6 0 10 PEAK HOUR: 12:00- 0 3 529 0 D 532 0 0 564 1 0 565 0 0 0 0 0 ,:q f0 r _ 1:00 PM ;-� a , -0.90 PHFt Al ;T NORTH STREET za ' 10 1 4 6 4 �L sukp� lfM f � eJ tltl.t + w n,Ji MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) a,{``� r '', , Ii' r;� 564565 A r7 S65 ` �'— 570 1 .. 532 629 1 a + fj v PI y� y.. :P' J j7N kl M r�trl , Y;. PEAK HOUR 12:00-1:;00 PM ,a e l .MOVEMENT DATA 16 1*,,,`'./ Iv POPE INTERSECTION: MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) @ DEPOT LANE PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/27/07 SATURDAY JURISDICTION: BROOKHAVEN _ START TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL c U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL LI-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT. THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL HL 1I:OD AM 0 13 90 0 0 103 0 0 125 6 0 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 12 0 18 252 1115 AM 0 7 III 0 0 118 0 0 140 14 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 15 0 22 294 11:30 AM 0 10 128 0 0 138 0 0 121 6 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 9 274 APM' Idf' 0E0 11(fl3.S1,73.� O.O.0. T00 ,1367.N 1I:0.�l+. 04°zY.:F6yr�a`xl1l...4Sjvs.ba77 p0 Y00p.h,f'dJYr;.•;£,`4:,+v,e iikx4�'do$1'f-��z0pO0R 0irtIP000 J!r s?f-,,µiry'.<,9}X,;•.+Yi.,r;z�:d.r$.:.:.s•n.r,j O 0OO0JIp1xze;;rrArt xz rhrtfuk,rIt��,JIO90O0' 2lI49b0lQ0O JZ 11677 0"`Ju�22'2.)9�81 y7E1s33t..sa-�:..:Tt '322<�85 1 rvxvaekr I25} 451 5P a I'mFO 0 15 127 0 0 142ntlH1k 0 0 96 7 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 13 0 20 265 I; 1:15 PM 0 12 136 0 0 146 0 0 87 6 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 16 257 1 1:30 PM 0 4 69 0 0 73 0 0 77 4 0 BI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 04 0 10 164 Ii 1:45 PM 0 6 136 0 0 142 0 0 128 6 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 l0 0 17 293 S PEAK HOUR: 12:00- 0 42 509 0 0 551 0 0 551 45 0 596 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5; 0 79 0 130 1277 1:00 PM PHF 0,96 DEPOT LANE 30 1 1 97 79 51 L4 MAIN ROAD (NYS 25) 4s 630 551 596 42 551 509 --- —� Pr-nH unlla�Il17:00-C 00 PM j Saturda¢zls I {l. u - u L_ 1 NELSON 6jPOPE " r TURNING MOVEMENT DATA PROJECT TITLE H IT` a s11 C}'OGUE INTERSECTION: SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD DEPOT LANE ,JURISDICTION:B1;00J(, ` DATE COLLECTED: 10/27/07 SATURDAY c SOUTHBOUND q�TOTAL CUM WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND �,kp -,T LI HOURI EASTBOUND - EFT THRU RIGHT RTOR;'f_..TAIR'1 E: 'RTHRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL START TIME HRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN L q: U-TURN LEFT T R TOTAL RIGHT RTO ,).. '' 53-' U-TURN LEFT THRU .I„ �, r� A x 19 5 Q 24 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 iO +r r ` 14. II 0 25 57- 11:00 AM 0 9 0 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 19 °^ iIF. 0 13 0 fi rw �`ay 0 13 38 11:15 AM 0 6 0 0 9 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 IS 0 0 ig��,. . ;t 11�.. 6 0 23 gf,' S3 201 1130 AM 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 rn,2 ary �9tt,r or 0 O , d N '�� r1'j' ssTd ax r,�t rn d 5 201 II45 AM 0 1 D rM12 ,r �+ %> psd s F O�/ d 1 20, u fOF till' t• �� 4 �+' �prMr Plik,. e5�0j�+)I p3n+1`D 'i�5 .E ti �D . s. _y i 1g'. 5 �p 24 54. 261 aP ' te m+ Q-ma"'+'.."rfre',+k*ylµ+* RO' "- 0 0 0 25 0 0 2b U x !I p 22 43' 24' I:DO PM 0 2 0 2 0 v 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 13 0 0 0j4r ,11"17 5 D IB 48 21i 1:15 PM 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 f? , 1 t T 12 ti' 33 171 1:30 PM 0 B 0 4 D 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 1 d®_ 40 10' 2 0 p p 0 0 0 :46 M 0 9 0 3 0 II o 0 0 0 61 11 0 ;y7` 3a4 n A br 116 27 0 143 26'B PEAR HOUR: 12:00- 0 25 0 16 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 fl s,,l „0.80 � N rt1 DEPOT LANE 9 143 1I 106 p rl Ig r M 27 116 1 re r , 6 x m x SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD �p J; .r 3094 Al 25IN 41 � ) 16 S g i 1' 0 4— , 1 i, !32 1 1� , PEAK HOUR 12,00-1:00 PM N e4 > FFF, I r, r 4, � MOVEMENTDATA ;. POPE INTERSECTION: MIDDLE ROAD (CR 48) Cm DEPOT LANE PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE COLLECTED: 10/27/07 SATURDAY JURISDICTION: BROMAVEN START TIME I EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL. C U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U-TURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL U'rURN LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR TOTAL HO 11:00 AM 0 2 109 14 0 125 0 13 87 1 0 101 0 9 2 11 0 22 0 0 1 0 0 I 249 11:15 AM 0 4 94 14 0 112 0 12 98 0 0 110 0 9 3 17 0 29 0 1 1 1 0 3 254 11:30 AM 0 3 88 8 0 99 0 12 110 2 0 124 0 10 3 14 0 27 0 0 3 3 0 6 256 11:45 AM 0 3 131 6 0 140 0 7 135 2 0 144 0 2 3 14 0 19 0 0 1 2 0 3 306 N • e +.5., •.yPYac Grh':'.:,:r ::. .rvT { l '.a' .._.w, r { .' ?3N y1'.�' AYp .1{ :G ,f,r�. c%c}v1 (Ir ,, ;c ,td �2„'.' x,60 vOJ.:?"f 15 .: 13bp eg f rr..k;.-0 w15L �;:kO r- :>�ti6 ,3 tw IF; v'Da`� 'x'.;26 ! ,ri0 44 IN, T . °LM..�:�tky ,�; k,: '.. Y'.',tisw r .., k,, � I r ' t }: Ir, � r I�8 r1t: rl3r ,s 'Q 11fi, R cOk,'8{S.'m"e r- ). SOh 11 )`.'r �7x J#:;'fiU11z' dO pjtatj:84�p�' 00»,v,i3443,fly l�r 31';i1t�)4 �a�.fl 8i ���ei3QU,�j,�.(1li 383 0 n�'. tnb �N �j Ys` Sg>in�`i t 11n�SQ�`,. „H`3"dm,.• r0 ,05,,rP;@,Rhys , ,I,S,',a Ow.tr�'126 OT: �Oy �tAA"�°9" 3t�11`21lfd,9 }+"i0', 7927Y"{-+ �1�Or,'r,F::ve, 2n, a 1:00 PM 0 5 126 13 0 144 0 19 126 3 0 148 0 9 8 10 0 27 0 0 2 2 0 4 323 I; 1:15 PM 0 2 98 7 0 107 0 8 103 2 0 113 0 17 4 12 0 33 0 0 1 1 0 Z 255 Ii 1:30 PM 0 2 96 5 0 103 0 II 100 1 0 112 0 9 0 i5 0 24 0 1 1 3 0 5 244 b 1:45 PM 0 0 67 15 0 102 0 3 33 0 0 36 0 4 3 2 0 9 0 0 1 1 0 2 149 S PEAK HOUR: 12:00- 0 26 467 77 0 570 0 69 506 3 0 578 0 27 21 54 0 102 0 7 12 9 0 2B 1278 1:00 PM PHF 0.92 DEPOT LANE 2B T 1 59 9 12 7 X14 MIDDLE ROAD (CR 48) O J L 3 542 506 578 26 r 69 570 467 525 ---� n I L51'� 27 21 54 lu: 158 t PEAK HOUR; 17:00-1:00. Pr'1 Int j 111 DEPOT LANE SalurdayAs PGM.VERSION 361.'40 New York State Department of Transportation , 4,y tl RC/STATION 070049 COVERAGE AND SPECIAL COUNT HOURLY REPORT i . [ .y : SUFFOLK MILEPOINT 0415990 NNS 9 TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD �,+�5„ - SOUTHOLD ST.TOURING RTE: 25 ROAD NAME: RT 25 TO: 4j SECTION FROM: N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE FUNCTIONAL CLASS 06 HPMS NUMBER s? M9ER' 7 FACTOR GRP 40 FEDERAL DLR. ]r ER 6E[N,KR: MEEK OF YR 25 RECORDER PLACEMENT: -�'i $SEyRIAL#: 3597 COUNT DATE: 612012 r N,/UDATA: TUBE COUNT .T . NOTES: WB RT 25 12 1 2 3 d 5 6 T B 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 1,R 11 12 DAY HI HI TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO '0 'D TO TO TO TO TO TO iTpi d^aA Oyp4 170, TO TO TOTAL COUNT HOUR DY 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RM e ".,¢. p 'T AM � S 2N 1J8 66 MO W R 362 516 479 524 532 509 511 431 33� 114 7343 617 16 20 d 2 g 8 2 6 A 4 190 7671 580 '13 21 5 z 63 17 10 9 11 41 142 248 382 d26 444 504 605 540 523 617 612 535 401 ` "+ Z9j7 r 6719 5B0 Afi 166 72 2z 6 z 85 56 22 17 18 37 117 204 348 4J8 509 668 680 498 519 576 554 695 '446y F 4 242 503 12 2J 7 2 101 68 48 31 14 28 66 176 263 352 439 482 479 465 526 580 576 4581 '4I ' , uF 80 5775 490 i6 1 119 zd 7 2 53 29 25 10 11 54 162 262 368 380 d11 50J 490 449 499 672 448 649 J291 2rs0zix+ '3 207 121 77 6 a. 28 18 4888 460 13 25 2 2 37 22 11 6 8 36 112 242 292 357 365 415 657 636 452 490 482 417, I3tld 5 5 431 360 439 310, 13 298 342 390 412 460 413 26 3 2 28 1] 1� 3 14 136 2 132 16 287 180 153 197 234 229 189 263 245 194 160 983 ?e rn k ¢ 27 4 2 13 3 T� a{, y 7 ACT AVERAGE WEEK 0 A Y H 0 U R (MON SAM THRU FRI 12 NOON) + p `. . Y) 53J9 65 30 14 9 7 9 31 113 210 J00 331 362 431 423 602 435 413 415 355 t28'/Y*' ♦'6 102 ADT r va + ��°-.�. t,,. (VEHICLES) AVG 'WEEKDAY HOUR { ,(ff� D' 5 :57 62 5095 - a' AXLE - FACTORED N , 29 13 9 7 9 30 108 200 286 316 368 411 404 38d d15 394 396 339.'.24 ` L-' SEASONALLY FACTORED �'rsESTIMATEp AHOY 7. SEASONAL t S r NT . .:.. ... .. %AVG FACTORED SFACTORED ;, :;- � ^�h ;� -� {_WAY COU _ NRS DAYS AVG HI HOUR DAY FACTOR! {x yq 7 : i�Y � 4599 _ COUNTcn COUNTED HI HR DAY 1.108 176 8 435 LA SOUTHOLD FROM SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE wr ,ST.TOURING RTE 25 ON RT 25 ' n Di nrrurNTr . ..�tl : .'w V is h New York State Depart. of Transportation PGM.VERSION*_ 4.0 RC/STATION 070049 COVERAGE AND SPECIAL COUNT HOURLY REPORT ST.TOURING RTE: 25 ROAD NAME: RT 25 MILEPOINT 0415990 NHS 9 COUNTY ; SUFFOLK SECTION FROM : N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO: TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD TOWN : SOUTHOLD FEDERAL DIR. 3 FACTOR GRP 40 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 06 HPMS NUMBER: BIN NUMBER: COUNT DATE : 612012 WEEK OF YR 25 RECORDER PLACEMENT: REFERENCE MKR: RECORDER SERIAL#: 3597 NOTES: EB RT 25 TUBE COUNT ADDITIONAL DATA: 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO 10 TO TO DY D D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 !0 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 9 10 11 12 DAY HI HI MO 'W R AM PIA _. TOTAL COUNT HOUR 20 4 1 492 547 580 533 519 543 522 436 366 292 270 216 166 75 21 5 1 58 16 6 10 7 59 178 337 482 439 550 631 738 674 483 639 626 625 434 436 355 266 162 137 8363 73a 13 22 6 1 94 38 18 10 18 49 161 254 394 486 622 692 684 643 622 737 514 531 461 387 351 309 188 127 3390 737 16 23 7 1 81 41 28 22 12 31 131 157 258 418 530 607 661 579 576 483 450 424 286 240 211 182 115 74 6597 661 13 24 1 1 54 25 9 5 16 55 179 300 418 418 527 500 627 508 491 488 480 436 383 264 241 196 117 66 6603 627 13 25 2 1 39 17 7 7 12 45 184 325 441 475 531 603 631 565 528 505 525 462 362 290 251 213 132 61 7211 691 13 26 3 1 36 19 10 10 20 6Z 183 315 438 457 539 524 564 616 566 610 602 449 485 288 319 273 249 109 7765 916 14 27 4 1 58 33 17 16 14 80 314 507 644 738 688 800 860 876 , 775 773 847 610 AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOUR (MON 6AM THRU FRI 12 NOON) ADT 48 21 10 11 13 62 208 357 485 505 555 601 656 620 576 584 595 519 399 284 270 225 166 73 7848 AXLE - FACTORED (VEHICLES) AVG WEEKDAY HOUR (FACTOR USED=0.954) ADT 46 20 10 10 12 59 198 341 463 482 529 573 626 591 550 557 568 495 301 271 25B 215 156 74 7407 SEASONALLY FACTORED HRS DAYS AVG %AVG FACTORED °/.FACTORED SEASONAL ESTIMATED AADT COUNTED COUNTED HIHR DAY HIHOUR DAY FACTOR 1-WAY COUNT 176 8 656 8.4% 626 8.4% 1.108 6757 ST.TOURING RTE 25 ON RT 25 FROM N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TO TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD STATION: 070049 COUNT DATE: 6/2012 ST.DIR: '! RECORDER PLACEMENT, a , 1 Page 1 of: STATION. 071115 New York State Department of Transportatim ot«, 'p i Traffic Count Hourly Report CR as- 11 Es �'* f COUNTY: . _ Suffofl ROAD 9: tl460 ROAD NAME:CR 48 FROM:DEPOT LANE TO PA U I G, <� TOWN SOUTMOLI DIRECTION: Eastbound FACTOR GROUP: 40 RFC.$ERLAL O' 1002 NHS" DIN STATE DIR CODE:6 WK OF YR: 30 PLACEMENT: I�rWRI r 7 f i RR OROSSfNG: DATE OF COUNT:07/23/2004 REF MARKER:MARKER' ,GGS4 hIPM55AfNPCE: NOTES LANE 0' 000000114630 ADDL DATA: A 4b COUNT TYPE:AXLE PAIRS '� - f'�04W., .., COUNT TAKEN SY' ORG CODE: DOT INITIALS:... PROCESSED 8Y: ORG CODE: DOT INITIALS _ 9 1U 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 p 6 `. 8 TO TO TO DAILY DAIL TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO 70 TO TO TO TO 70 TO 11T - 1 `4 10 11 12 DAILY : HIGH HIGI 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11_-12 1 2 3 4 5 6 T –.--- — ,. { TOtAI .00WNT HOU DAT� D,1YI _....._� N i1 1 7 ... d �f 2 F 1° 4 $ G M1fl '.t 1 .Vo �I 6 T 7 W 9 F ` 10 S 13 7 14 W +y t, 15 T r 16 17 S RT 18 S � ,,� t I- 19 M 20 T 21 W ,.' I 22 T 757 722 726 720 769 825y 76, 44 x;66 311 166 23 F 88 1T37 189 118 0L08f^'' 780 24 S 654 59 46 19 18 2,1 91 274 404 . 490 '614 634 780 759 7d3 726 711 629 64 4, 11,285 i17 76 6035x" G34 25 S 79 29 26 9 .19 67 200 256 313 419 602 686 730 691 807 854 689`1 49. 9 Y74, ,,205 114 72 8573.: 2G h1 33 14 10 7' 17 72 386 587 814 545 5g5 63d -fi90 605 603 696 G3of" 60J5" '184 137 62 g 54 27 T 33 11 1d 4 i0 6'6 344 803 614 539 562 687 547 673 620 610 683 637 9 258 217 98 0739', 726 28 t�v' 37 17 11 7 10 80 314 $21 591 536 448 639 636 617 670 546 670 61 $4 1$73 °228 132 76 8171; 6.70 29 7 25 26 11 8 27 85 351 565 561 X620 '653 627 657 7'15 660 670 726; 68iti), �, „ � � '4`32 316 220 11404" 849 30 P 43 20 15 13 30 77 391 604 550 '666 72S 714 756 721 849 805 Sd9 . 78§1 31 S '105 46 23 26 25 8� 261 591 SH 7`15 791 892 974 ADT AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOURS(Axle Fectorod,Mon 6AM to Fri Nnora) 148 7G 8717 34 18 11 8 19 71 348 567 620 672 584 628 577 594 5b0 598 bGb 52 1 4if r '„ 4,. ESTIMATED DAYS HOURS WCEKDAYo1NEEK6AY AVERAGE WEEKDAY A>.IeAdI. r,011n1wi Counted L0219 Hours Wgh Hour °k of day r c 1D gel v.�8, 9 teaSUR s 163 6n �, 7204 r0. P160d, I 07/23/21 `T°' 0711116 New York fat r I rtment of Transportation J� <� �0 TraffwUnt !-burly R�por CH 0 vve ROAC M 0480 ROAD NAME: CR 48 FROM:DEPOT LANE TO'. PECONIC LANE COUNTY: SuPfo; DIREOTION: WesdBound FACTOR ©ROUP: 40 RFC, SERIAL 4: 1003 FDNC, CLAS;:02 TOWN SOIITHOL. STATE DIP CODE:7 WK OF YR: 30 PLACEMENT: NHS; yes 13IN: DATE-:Or C0UN,r 07f2312004 Ccr)REF NIARKER: JI}RIS: Couru y RR CROSSING: NOTES LAME 0:000000111670 A001-DATA: CC Stn: HPMS SAMPLE: GOUNTTYPG:AXLE PAIRS BATCH ID: DOT-ri0sw34o COUNT TAKtHN BY: OiRG CODE:'DOT INITIAL& --- PROCESSED UY: ORG CODE: DOT INI1"IALS: 12 1 2 9 1 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 1 3 4 G 6 7 8 9 10 11 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO To TO 1-0 TO DAILY IOAIL ^ 2 3 R 5 6 7 8 5 1Q Ti 12 'L 2 3 4 F 5 7 0 9 '10 11 _12 DAILY P06Ghd HVOI _.ITOTfai. OCLINT 1i',�U I z r• 3 5 4 S 5 M 6 T 7 W 8 7' s r- 10 S 11 s 12 ivl 13 T 14 W 18 T 16 F 17 S 10 S 19 M 20 T 2.1 W 22 T 277 144 23 F '674 606 606 672 720 736 643 670 907 360 256' 24 S fit 39 22 21 21 66 168 255 378 556 618 735 715 657 618 705 561 493 60,9 370 354 329 272 149 0660 756 25 S 81 39 21 27 16 46 89 172 314 471 669 676 743 774 882 01.0 761 588 848 G19 612 424 .719 1136 10065 262 1 20 M 46 8 0 24 52 132 338 480 658 596 630 638 670 608 650 739 749 588 668 386 345 200 it33 73 9364 749 1 27' T 4.1 1'8 11 16 28 902 298 610 626 664 691 555 611 626 603 682 763 560 474 324 296 162, 117 57 6601 763 1 24 W 30 1� 7 15 28 78 270 423 578 566 661 566 571 556 625 625 649 624 480 2,60 293 166 124 77 6216 Fi49 1 20 T 46 12 16 19 26 1.22 297 468 839 693 555 534 600 520 669 738 776 645 546 393 432. 247170 108 9262 776 1 30 1; 41: 28 313 24 41 106 300 464 568 603 597 649 681 628 645 769 756 638 608 417 391 303 230 138 91353 76? I 31 5 81 49 39 29 30 70 134 261 405 579 .629 754 732 AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOURS(Ax(e Factored, Man 6AM to Fri Noon) ADT 39 19 -18 18 31 101 299 461 606 580 579 595 606 694 629 687 724 600 519 337 338 152 147. 78 8783 DAYS HQURS 'WEEKDAYS WEEKDAY ,.._AVF GE_WEEKDAY Axle Adj, 3e:asonalMteekday ESTIMA'TE'D QlQu=;i C�ry(2U =11a, PIIgh New of day Ea— Adj r tm rffiFac@or f7 194 5 403 734 6%, 0.957 1.210 AAC 7'259 ROAD 9A 0480 ROAD NAME: CR 48 FROM:DEPOT'LANE TO' PECONICLANC; 1pUN]Y: SrrF fol Si(+TIO'M 071116 STATE DIR CODE:7 PLAG'S'MC�NT: aAl-ECJ COUN'C 9�/2.i/200 9 41 HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES NYS ROUTE 25(MAIN ROAD)WEST OF DEPOT LANE 1r Wednesday,October 2d,2007-Tuesday,October 30 2007 'n.p fi '�[Mo dd October b92007 fb?'�TUuda 'OcfnburJ 98hrda ORober 37 100] Sud Octd en b Fride October 26,1007 5 81 7fV,rB EH TOT WH BH rAMI dnadu October 34 bo07 Tburede eae . WBEB TOT WB E ' ,EB6 111 20 1 i N 1 l a 1d 39 .t6 1010 2417 IA IL3q 11 ',0j ! �I716 [Z` 17 '6 ]5 26 4 1133 G4 ',Il 1N �7° 59 107 ( t 101 try )6 '9 7g 3 _105 15] tit IIs 177 04 106 150 JO l t +' 4 208 239 447 117 '- 226 419 10. 105 196 4 9 � 7G1 ,. 41] 774 95y t d 787 5:00 AM 19S 139 436 175 ^_53 42] 19L 3. 6:00 AM 15.N 400 ]SB 357 •7(16 160 JNi 420 B0] 180 '_OR 397 157 11b7 dl'S 9J] Jp5 490 !71 503 977 27fl 400 675 44 L'ri 2 y,. _ tt�{ 5 .469 eGe `6d .� •IRO 7:00 AM 441 501 91d JJU JNO 920 All 17] 421 - 90..5 1006 70 ,�88 1y ¢ttlg1R9 i. i 8:00 AM .en 456 903 •117 ,139 856 396 111 f I td p .t9d 868 .105 •1G7 491 477 969 511 A"> 1010 411 1v"S5 u §6 ;, tp JIT dM BBI '" , t x+1361 1: 765 926 !J< 461 9:00 AM 473 449 892 552 568 1120 Jag 51 0 ,� ^ A.S.i 975 t J(,R 10:00 AM 471 JP7 928 d29 469 896 4A1 492 999 SRF 617 1213 M114 Yg1Y p`1 81 i r 'f4 !- 511] 971 r 11:00 AM •14.5 499 9dJ 4•ki 451 9980! 525 - 441 899 4i5 4':5 d„5 4't1 996 6:17 421 IDSA 59, h1v �b� ' 1 1576 458 1020 512 447 12:00 PM 441 59 969 464 5111 965 604 515 1119 594 517 I I I I N I a SP.4 481 977 tt�50 419 1169 561 1:00 PM 463 465 917 497 6131 t r l ..Q 4 sn, 5'_H 526 (r15 1141 SSI ]OS IL86 578 496 IOJd 2- AF. 511 r.'. 558 1095 2,00 PM 512 5116 1078 51u ,tN6 1005 ! ) �'* 1 d`J t 778 7'00 PM Sa] 5dd 1091 57F 515 1097 597 556 1149 5' x ` e'477 452 949 50.7 980 597 4]P 1076 432 JJS 85] t3ir 5�J Z,N'6 1 t = R8 207 685 777 145 4:00 PM 493 456 951 510 +150 7 199 3.19 749 ID 752 775 iGG 3d) Al :'I, '37( I!q, �qi 2:11 534 297 24] 5:00 PM 12(1 710 760 3:IA 769 603 255 109 594 1 SN 8 ' rt 333 196 111 229 461 297 264 561 ^_44 492 1lA 15,1 Y' � X35 107 6;00 PM 752 309 193 501 ”"-JA t 0 2 9 7 214 167 781p ' p 478 3 9 15 7:00 PM 216 IZi 347 3,1p 211 d61 127 �O1, 'YI ��1y9 LB� `� y II U4 51 310 253 Is, 404 2 5 hk 1 64 174 1. 9:00 FM 210 9.1 304 107 101 IqA 114 JJ2 NN til 201 209 IN 317 i 1 }5x i� 1 33 82 44 38. 9:00 PM IIN 56 174 178 215 49 133 T$ 211 12] 93 d2 3 6 °�kk 9g� 3' 16 38 `0 0 10:00 PM 63 JJ 107 SN 7d 92 E7 55 138 31 16 �zY 'S 22 .;. 4 AS P [ � 11:00 PM 29 20 49 39 Is 57 ( 6,654 1332A f555 6567 DAILV eA2 17,905 6,079 65$0 e! 9 f6h¢674 _ 7 215 14 791 7,077 6, cIMPr54^ f ^ TOTAL 6 619 6,677 ]J 293 6 771 6,6Ad IJ,d16 7,517 ' tl F I ' � 4y� T g r fM W 1 n HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES DEPOT LANE NORTH OF NYS ROUTE,25(MAIN ROAD) Wednesday,October 24,2007-Tuesday,October 30,2007 TIME Wednade ,October 24,2007 Th.,,d.y.October 252007 Fride ,Oeteber262WO SO de ,October 272007 Snndn ,October 2B,20(0 Mande ,October 29,2007 Tucode ,October HEGIN SH NH TOT SH NH TOT SH NB TOT SH N'H TOT SH NH TOT 1� SD N11 TOT IED N❑ 12:00 AM 3 1 4 I 5 6 3 '1 10 ( 11 IB 11 '!1 38 5 1 9 1 a I 1;00 AM 2 1 3 2 0 2 1� 3 3 6 5 9 14 '_6 19 45 I 2 5 2 2;00 AM 3 1 4 3 4 7 0 2 7 IO 17 7 7 14 I 2 0 0 3°,OOAM 3 Z 5 3 2 4 1 2 3 1 G 9 4 1 7 e It 2 �I� 7 0 4:00 AM 4 5 9 3 3 6 4 5 9 8 l0 IB ppp� n 3 9 2 5 -^ " 5:00AM 12 10 22 19 12 31 9 14 23 9 I1 20 1 ] 13 ! Ili 10 26 11 v 6:00 AM 41 10 81 1 51 11 79 43 h0 103 _4 26 49 I7 JO 47 31 18 69 3.5 11 7:OOAM 96 74 170 73 73 146 91 102 1 193 51 5, 107 j .13 ;h 131 92 75 167 80 71 1 IT7 [as 7S 9:00 AM 10tB 100 ZSB 1777 74 151 83 BII 19'_2 193 1 21 715 I14 263 1ISt 1fJl 202 217 1!q it 164 17 SH 9:00 AM 2 1(14 51 51 10:00 AM 70 50 120 I]A 6$ 143IB5 91 IDP 199 7J 9910 75 7 171 1� n9 1 8.58 IS6 70 52 122 1 dS eR 1100 AM 79 72 I51 I 12:00 PM 67 60 127 61 60 121 122 195 307 131 11;. 243 c8 0'4 212 II ti'I 104 li 1 61 1:00 PM B9 6N 152 93 NE 151 93 I^_5 208 8;1 `1N 185 92 9d IB6 79 72 I51 68 1 (J 2100PM 8G 55 141 89 68 157 'A2 1 4 196 B4 87 171 11 79 57 166 �1 81 51 132 7n 59 3:00 PM 96 75 171 71 36 157 IITt 153 259 80 2 172 B). SK 170 'i p,5 1 N6 I83 1 74 94 4;00 PM 83 ]9 162 7b 13G 214 97 14p 246 h] 119 IB6 71 1.1 125 94 78 162 87 94 5:00 FM 78 32 160 70 124 205 1 G 147 254 lit -�5 157 GI 5' ' 1❑ 71 77 143 �� 89 FI 6:00 PM d'J 58 127 93 121 204 1:' n6 250 BB 74 162 1 01 iv BB 16 All 116 7;00 PM JI 25 66 SE 91 117 tid S3 147 1 39 109 148 37 31 68 J2 37 69 31 44 � 9:00 PM 22 17 39 d4 ]9 ]l 38 d9 A6 l9 65 104 I6 I; 29 35 2D 55 27 IO 1 9:00 PM 19 1ti JS 23 3S £B 38 31 B9 40 a6 86 I',. II 27 I4 I,S' 29 16 G 10:00PM 9 12 21 U 27 42 37 49 86 31 36 67 10 II 2I I7 12 29 16 1 I I'00 PM 8 d 14 3 2 5 14 31 45 30 31 61 7 7 l4 4 6 5 1 �1 DAII,Y TOTAL 1,169 991 2,150 1,196 1,281 2,47] ],]67 1,962 7,129 1,271 1,566 2,837 1,131 _ 1,215 2,346 1,175 991 2,]6fi L104 972 DEPOT ROAD n4y,.1. Chapter 6 Adjustment Factors 2006 NYS DOT Traffic Data Report Chapter:.6 A,djustmentFactors. Section 6.1 Seasonal(Monthly) Adjustment Factors Seasonal or monthly adjustment factors convert average daily traffic (ADT) to annual average daily traffic (AADT). Ile ADT is divided by the seasonal factor to obtain the AADT value. The work week seasonal,factolraFe developed fromNYSDOT con6rs counter daa'collected fot tlir e a pen°d e ntmuous ounier sneer a�t.�l ,mIo=t3ire nqa or�act r sou s tom" . a< 3 gyral' nt a < s ' E Ar �.. 0 a]I Of"tl`le'132a Or :F 5'" ` e �E Or V ll aSSOlate wl 6'-ft-Mo $.S are ' Monthly average daily traffic (MADT) values based on weekday data are developed Ior each 1 month in each factor group. The factor values are computed by dividing the week day NiADT by the AADT within each factor group. The factoring procedure does account for weekend traffic. Other daily (7 day) and weekend seasonal adjustment factors are available from the Traffic Monitoring Section by request. J TheFull Week MART is calculated by applying the "hour rule" to continuous count data. For inclusion and computations, the intervals must be complete, the data valid, and include both directions and all lanes. A determination is made whether there are sufficient counts for each j interval to calculate an MADT using the"3 hour rule."The"3 hour rule" requires, for the month, �\ l at least 3 valid counts for each count interval of the 24 hours for each day of week. If there are J not sufficient intervals to calculate an MADT using the "3 hour Wile," the "2 hour rule" is used which requires at least 2 valid counts for each count interval of the 24 hours for each day of the week. Each hour interval for the entire month is averaged. The 24 hours is summed to get the Full Week MADT for the associated month. Work Week and Weekend MADTs are calculated in the same fashion except for the days and hourly intervals used. The "hour rule" used. is reported to indicate the amount of data present for the particular month that was used in calculations. The total number of traffic monitoring sites in each factor group is adequate to achieve a precision of fl o%with 95% confidence when applying these factors to adjust count volume data in accordance with TMG requirements. Refer to Figure 5 for the work week seasonal adjustment `l factors which are also available via the internet on the NYSDOT web page specified-on page 2. l+ To calculate an AADT for a short term or coverage count using a Seasonal Adjustment Factor, refer to section 6.3, "Example of Estimation of AADT". 39 • i' i • Chapter 6 Adjustment Factor.t WORKWEEK (WEEK DAY) SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR 2007 TRAFFIC COUNT PROCESSING ( Based on 2004- 2006 Continuous Count Site Data ) FACTOR GROUP JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC: 31 1.003 1.046 1 ,068 1.107 1,129 1.174 1.147 1 .158 1.124 1,127 1 .075 1 ,060 30 0,935 0,963 1,003 1,052 1,080 1 ,120 1.105 1.111 1.070 1.067 1.025 1.009 29 0.867 0.920 0.936 0.997 1.031 1.056 1.063 1.064 1.016 1 ,007 0.975 0.958 STD (a-1-) 0.068 0.063 0.065 0.055 0,049 0.054 0.042 0.047 0,054 0.060 0.050 0.051 41 0.875 0.948 0.949 1,029 1.118 1.193 1.339 1.3i 0 1 .138 1.071 0.992 0.957 40 0.797 0,855 0.870 0.945 1,041 1 .111 1.226 1.206 1.057 1.004 0.926 0.895 39 0.719 0,762 0,791 0.851 0.964 1.029 1.113 1,102 0.976 . 0.937 0.860 0.823 STD 0.078 0.093 0.079 0.084 0.077 0.082 0.113 0.104 0.081 0.067 0.066 0.072 61 0.727 0,772 0.810 0.904 1.066 1.297 1.748 1 ,658 1.132 0.941 0.847 0.773 60 0.650 0.687 0,713 0.785 0.972 1.177 1.617 1.542 1.065 0,886 0.765 0.706 59 0,573 0.602 0.616 0.668 0,878 1.057 1.486 1.426 0.998 0.831 0.683 0.639 STD (4/-) 0.077 0,085 0.097 0.118 0.094 0.120 0.131 0.115 0.067 0.055 0.082 0.067 ti z Figure 5N a 0 w n a w PP L O I�1G WEEKEND SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR 2007 TRAFFIC COJt T (Based on 2004-2006 Continuous Count Site Data �j � - �I `i 'A OCT NOV DEC FACTORAPR MAY JUN JUL AUGII GROUP JAN FEB MAR 6 p;969 0.930 0.919 31 0,858 0.879 0.930 0.949 1.005 1.015 1.007 0.984,' 0.856 0.839, 0,779 0.806 0.863 0.877 0,923 0.936 0.913 O.B9fi� ,t' s O,.Bi92 30 p " 0,815 0.782 O.Z59' 29 0.700 0.733 0.796 0.805 0.841 0.857 0.819 0808) ' 77 0.074 0 080 + 0.079 0.073 0.067 0.072 0.082 0.079 0.094 0 088] 11 R ' N+,ry�•Q STD ( I-) �'7{ ,4 i, '�'1069 0.994 05883- 41 0.867 0.952 0.956 0.977 1.099 1.161 1.319 1 306E z 0974 0.894 0.806 1.167 1 1f53 40 0.756 0.822 0.863 0.908 1.012 1.075 0 0.794 0 Z29 0.845 0.692 0.770 0.839 0.925 0.989 015 1.001 39 ? 0 9,95 0.100 0.077 STD 0.111(+!-) 0.130 0.093 0.069 0.087 0.086 0.152 0.1.521 kp + M1 0,884 0.•,762 ' _; 1'.125 �• 61 0.726 0.805 0.824 0.905 1.198 1.386 1.911 1.8241 0 966 0.783 kOMI 60 0.727 0.946 1.094 1.415 1�362� 13{ P7 0.&A7 0.682 0;600 0.650 0.706 0.744 0.816 1,072 1.24D 1.663 1.59 ti, 0.574 0.607 0.864 59 " STD (+l-) 0.076 0.099 0.080 0.089 0.126 0.146 0.248 0.23 1 „ 7 0 139 0.101 0.061- , k. 13�F y h F err Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 92 Occupied Dwelling Units of Active Adult Community Founder's Village, Town of Southold I&ctober 2007 Average Driveway Rate/Unit Velume Weekday Average 8-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.15 13 8-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.19 17 8-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.34 31 4-5 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.08 7 4-5 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.09 6 4-5 PM Peak Hour Total 0.17 13 Saturday 11-12PM Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.27 25 11-12PM Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.24 22 11-12PM Saturday Peak Hour Total 0.51 47 Appendix B: Trip Generation HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOUNDERS VILLAGE DRJV'E1VAY-ENTER& EXI:r Wednesday,OCtnbcr 24,2007-Tncsday,OCtobcr 30,2007 TIME Wednel October 14 1007 Thond9 ,OCteber25 IU07 Frid. ,October 26,1007 Stilted e ,October 27,2009 Sondra ,October 29,1007 Mend n ,Ortnb.129.3007 T'uwdo ,0 BEGIN Enter Exit TOT Enter Exit TOT Enter Emit TOT !Enter E.i( TOT 1 Enter Exit TOT --��1 Enter Emil TOT F.nmr 12:00 AM 0 i1 0 0 0 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 fl 0 0 0 I 1 0 0 1 u a n n 0 n li n 2;00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 III 0 'i� 0 0 n 3'Z AM 1 I 2 I 0 I 1 0 I 1 0 2 0 0 0 Y 1 jl 4:00 AM 1 3 J 1 2 1 J a �� 1 a 1 n � 5:00 AM 3 J 6 0 2 2 h 1 3 4 1 3 4 6:00 AM 7 I I 18 1 18 22 I 6 7 6 7 ❑ 1 , 9 a 14 n 7;00 AM 6 i II N II 19 1,1 1,3 26 S 13 ZI 1 16 12 16 25 3 8:00 AM 1.3 14 27 .5 j 9 14 13 17 30 a L2 20 10 I1 21 11 IJ x1 II 9 ]I II l9 30 I3 15 29 bl 9:00 AM 4 II II 22 14 ,15 43 � II Zt 39 IJ I. �I 1! 5 li JZ 15 IIo;oo AM i sn v 43 a �I 2I Jd � z1 1 21 4a w � z1 Js m I1 ]a I 1 i 11;00 AM 9 14 23 1.5 14 29 25 19 I 44 j o 47 17 27 11 IF ��, l0 37 1? 4 32 o 41 L00 M I I1 14 27:00 PM 20 15 35 22 1J II 13 19 21 52 21 1 1] 1� l4 i` 11 ]J 2" :o 50 '5 �� 1 26 ty n 26 2' 2} 51 0 200 PM 1 13 IS ]0 jl R , M 20 � 1, ]5 � 1 �i 1[ 300 PM II 9 20 17 14 31 1J 12 25 �j IJ I:. 25 11 17 1 11 ze a�l 72 56 n I6 IJ 35 29 t 13 21 jl 17 0 26 12 I' 24 it I2 26 1 5:00 PM J 10 13 n ] 13 j� R 11 ti 9 17 S 1121 �I 10 > 16 I1 GIGO PM 6 1 j 13 4 4 9 4 7 11 @ 11 H 6 14 �,1 '1 13 20 700 PM n I 7 6 i a 7 _ 9 4 6 1, I G 1 _ 11 1 fi 1 8;00 PMI 4 0 4 1 ^I � fi 10 � I 2 J j I � ' I 9;00 PM i) '1 0 l 11 2 5 10:00 PM 0 U 0 0 11:00 P M n n o lIi r I n 1 11O1 Z I l211( d2J 1 d 7 11) d o o 0 0 _n —n 0 0,2 1 0 DAILY JA1 162 77S d37 2" 232 d4o0 ITOTAL 151fit 021 16 7 o SJ61I _ f�11MnnFF VII!.fi(If,Cl1MIIINfiII CII�RTnb ,, _ �� 2. @ i < <-` ✓.wz .,, S.d,.��`w- .�„r.� x�-•�r� r-w-».¢.,i �.z�q-�`- `".«ry# sm� ,ire sir ,�.'"°t'- .� i�'.�.�' ` Yv` N M% e�� t '� M -a -+x'-t sF -�a..5„ 'Rr. a^� '.�: .a-s.:�y'�� L A�_ �r � s��,�^^�+r�b*r S `w.ri} t� r, e�� +r,�.�'aSr1 s�� ti,e'� �' 1 d r �+a � P. - +_5 ��r _.: .:.. ... ... .. . . ...... ae._r —<aa.. —. .�. .r..,. .. _ :_: ... -ice.. .,. ..... .. . .jv n Appendix C: Level of Service Definitions rte. =� � �- .4� ��;:�. =. .�. � _� _�.�.� � ��E:$ 5��r � � �.. '+Rk-NdrNr�Y1� ted ^�^a�ars:�q x ya*�. 'i`'>?�re-� ara �.x�a4 �4-r �.�}..-s ..«.+us �. ,�.� #x ,�.u��r--"xa�.reL�`a+�-�t�w awi rn�we k xk �t�SFr��+��€,... ��� � b - �,m �'t"�—T xR "�� �Ts r �t"c � � � �r'� 4 "�" `a y^€"ss.'^Ttt r� .. ^3"€ • i LEVEL OF SERVICE: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. The levels of service range between level of service A (relatively congestion-free) and level of service F (congested). The delay experienced by,a.motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, geometry, traffic, and incidents at an intersection. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during ideal conditions: in the absence of traffic control, in the absence of geometric delay, in the absence of any incidents, and when there are no other vehicles on the road. The portion of the total delay attributed to the control facility is called the control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Control delay may also be referred to as signal delay for signalized intersections, T evel of service criteria for signalized intersections is determined in terms of the average control delay per vehicle. The following average control delays are used to determine approach levels of service: Level of Service A _< 10.0 seconds per vehicle Level of Service B > 10.0 and <_ 20.0 seconds per vehicle Level of Service C > 20.0 and 535.0 seconds per vehicle Level of Service D > 35.0 and <_ 55.0 seconds per vehicle Level of Service E > 55.0 and <_ 80.0 seconds per vehicle Level of Service F > 80.0 seconds per vehicle Level of Service A describes operations with very low control delay. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable; most vehicles arrive during the green phase and do not stop at all. Short traffic signal cycles may contribute to low delay. Level of Service B generally occurs with good progression and/or short traffic signal cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for level of service A, causing higher average delays. Level of Service C has higher delays than level of service B. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures, where motorists are required to wait through an entire signal cycle, may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping_ Level of Service D At this level, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths or high volume-to- capacity ratios. The proportion of stopping vehicles increases. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level of Service E is considered the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths and high volume-to-capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures occur frequently. Level of Service F is considered unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with over saturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may occur at volume to capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. LEVEL OF SERVICE: TWO WAY STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS The quality of traffic service at a two-way stop controlled, or "TWSC ' infersectiSn is`"measured according to the level of Service ands capacity of individual legs. The level of service,ranges from LOS A to LOS F,just as with signalized intersections. The right of way at the TWSC intersection is controlled by stop signs on two opposing legs of an intersection (on one leg of a "T"-type intersection). The capacity of a controlled leg is based on the drstr l utton o gaps m be�ma3on,.sstreet traffic flow*dr>v�e�r�4dd�nent rr}se�ec�mg a gap through which to exece�thd��anhve?¢azid�flifblla.ayp timer@quuedby=eat h dnr tti a queuC a. t, .r-...,�•� -y- .� .'� tar; r o-�p ^.. `rw- a� ��..° kms M traffic andiitcdents otal eLa is the• elence e1 eeli the ave tni ac,� alle x`�e 'el �i`tt�e re er_;P a trave 4"£ime th'a�'"v3or�f��''�es'�S] d c"6i1d�o'�s"'w'�t1Y°'�t���o;�e a�id�*itfie�aliseg e�ro�+ _ - incidents, control;and traffic This prp�ant_only quatrhfies that porhon�o�the total delay attriButed-�to " traffic control measwes, either traffic signals or stop signs. This delay is called control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration. Average control delay for any particular minor movement is a function of the approach and the degree of saturation. The expectation is that TWSC intersections are designed to carry smaller traffic volumes than signalised intersections. Therefore, the delay threshold times are lower for the same LOS grades. The following } average control delays are used to determine approach levels of service: Level of Service A s 10 seconds per vehicle l Level of Service B > 10 and <_ 15 seconds per vehicle s _ Level of Service C > 15 and <_ 25 seconds per vehicle Level of Service D > 25 and <_ 35 seconds per vehicle Level of Service E > 35 and <_ 50 seconds per vehicle Level of Service F > 50 seconds per vehicle IL- l�- L- L r Appendix D; Capacity Analysis/Level of Service Worksheets & Summary Tables Hrttlr'AGEni CUTCmOs UE Detailed LOS Summeekday AM Peak Hour Anal sir Build Condition with Trnffic Signal Exia6vg Covdifivv Na Build CvvdiHov 2007 Hand Cvvdifivn 2007 Mitign Hvv � V/C Ratio Delay LOS VIC Ratio Delay LOS V/C Ratio Delay LOS V/C Ratio Delay LOS SedVeh Sec/Veh Sac/Veh Seo/Veh Intersectio. Approach Movt. O.I9 6,G A EB L 0.06 9.4 A 0Oe 9.5 A 0.09 9.5 A T - - - - - - - 0,40 6.6 A Main Road(NYS 25)at Depot Lane V B TR - - - - - - - 0.70 17,3 B SB LR 0.47 29,0 D 1 0.51 32,1 D 054 34.9 D 0.40 32.8 C Overall 0.52 14.5 B LB LT 0.07 9.3 A D.OB 9.4 A 0,08 9.4 A - - - Main Road(NYS 25)at Griffin Street SB L 026 32.5 D 0.29 35.8 E 0.32 37,4 E - - - R 0.10 134 B 0,11 137 B 0,13 13,8 B _ - EB L 0.01 9.2 A 0.02 9,4 A 0.02 94 A - - WB L 0,08 9.5 A 0.09 9.7 A 0.09 9.7 A - - NB LT 037 30.2 D 0.43 35,9 E 0,46 37.5 E - - Middle Road(NYS 48)at Depot Lane R 0.12 11.5 B 0.16 11.9 B 0.16 12.0 B - - SB LT 0,11 25.7 D 0.11 27,6 D 0.11 27.9 D - - R 0.02 10.7 B 0.02 11.1 B 0,02 11.1 B NB LT 0,00 7,6 A 0,00 7,6 A 0.01 7.6 A - School House Road at Depot Lane EB LR 0.06 10.2 B 0,06 10,2 B 0.08 10.4 B EB LT 0.00 8.9 A 0.00 9.0 A O.OD 9.0 A - - - Main Road(NYS 25)at Crown Land Road SB LR 0.04 16.7 C 0,04 17.3 C 0.05 16.6 C Main Road(NYS 25)at Highland Road EB Cr 0.01 a,a A o.01 a.9 A o.01 g,9 A - S6 LR 0.06 19,3 C 0.06 20.1 C 0.07 19,6 C - - EB LT 0,00 9.2 A 0,00 9 3 A 0.00 9.3 A - - Main Road(NYS 25)at North Street 5B LR 0.00 13.7 B - 400 14.0 B 0.02 24,1 C EB LT NIA N/A 0.00 7.3 A - - - S ite Driveway at School House Road SB LR 0.02 8.9 A - - fx d f;'� try 4dJ vi 1ptailed LOS Summa -Weekda PM Peak Hour Anal sis Build Condition with Tnflic Signal - 7-.:; df , Build Condition 2007 Mitigation x' k� r E.. q Evsting Condition No Build Condition 2007 Aelny LOS LOS Delay LOS alio SedVeh Delay V/C R Delay LOS VI Ratio SeaNeh : y V/C Reno SecNeh A 0,11 6.6 A �, ,� 4 'anl, 'T ,yV/C Ratio Sec/Vch 9.6 A 0.05 9.G lute" I _ t ' � ,� .0.05 9.5 A 0.05 _ 0,56 8.B A 1 �`. v _ 076 19.3 9 ' <.. m u 1, f 3. 0.71 65.2 F 0 36 320 C tv(eid'Ro' d'�(NYS 25):at Depot Lane - P 0 69 61,4 P 51.4 Overall 0.57 15.4 B 004 9.3 A 9.2 0.04 9.1 A 0.�6 JJ 7 D 0.17 94.2 B - ,... 0.14 71.2 D B 0.09 140 _ Ivtsil�toad4(NYS 25)at Griffin Street :j ri (f B 0.09 13.9 - ;. dSiR ; 0.08 17.5 A 0.02 9.7 A - A 0.02 9.7 A L :'. 0.02 9,2 0.05 9.3 A 0.05 9.7 L 0.D4 9.1 A 26.1 D 0.30 26.3 0.29 D _ 0.27 24.5 C B 0.08 11.1 B r 10.9 6 0.08 11.1 Mi 5leRoed'(j4YS:48)at.De of Lane4 ' ' )t R 0.07 0 04 z2.z c o 04 22.2 C p .. u 1 LT 004 21.4 C 0.02 10.9 8 0.02 10.9 A 10.8 B 7.5 A 0.00 7.5 r 7.5 A 0.00 A I• )LT .0.00 006 9.9 A 0.07 10.0- is: 8 :':.,.� LR 0.06 9.9 A q 11.01 49 A SchooWHovac Road at Depot Lane ty y 8 E A 0.01 8 9 14.9 B 0.07 14.8 B ! 0.03 14A B 0,07 0.01 9.0 A MainiRoad'+1(NYS.25)a[Crown Land Ro'�d ["# �,, , F LR. A 0.01 90 A C $LT � 0.01 8.9 0,05 20.1 C 005 197 _ -' 19.2 C A Mein Ro9td`(NYS 25)at Highland Roaxtl , �� A�{LR ,; 0.05 0.00 91 A o 00 9.1 �.DT 000 9.1 A 0.01 J0.4 D 0.01 70.7 O .. �'," � 28.7 D _ Mam-Road"(NYS 25)at North Street , " }J''RI 0.01 0 00 7.7 A NIA N/A 0.01 8.7 A Site Dn'veway.at School House Road i ;iLR.: R 4 zZz s 1 n r� 4yr ��1 t 1 it LL r (( HL,..,aGE';.:--UTC!,--JE . Detailed LOS Summa - Saturday Peak Hour Anal sis Existivg Condition No Build Cavdifiov 2007 Build Condition 2007 Build Condition Traffic Signal Min withion Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Iuf m,oi.v Approvch M.". V/C Ratio Sec/Veh V/CRatio Sec/Veh VIC Ratio SeelVeh V/C Ratio See/Veh EB L 0,06 9.4 A 0,06 9.6 A 0.06 9.6 A 0.14 6,6 A T - - - - - - - - 0,53 8.0 A Main Road(NYS 25)at Depot Lane %VB TR - - - - - 0.74 18.5 D SB LR 0.70 50.1 F 0.77 61,6 F 0.61 68.3 F 0.47 33.5 C Overall 0.55 15,4 B EB LT - 0,04 9.1 A 004 9.2 A ( 0.05 9,3 A Main Road(NYS 25)at Griffin Street SB L 0.37 1 37.2 E 0 41 41.3 E 0.44 44,3 E - - - _ A 0.17 i3.7 B 0,14 14.0 B 0.15 14.2 B EB L 0 O4 9.0 A 0.04 9.1 A 0.04 9.1 A - - - WB L 0.09 9.1 A 0.10 9.2 A 0.10 9.1 A - - Mlddle Road(NYS 48)at Dcpot Lane NB LT 0.27 26.8 D 0,29 28.7 D 0.33 30.0 D j - - - R 0.10 10.9 B 0.11 10.9B 0.11 11,0 B SB LT 0.11 25.0. C 0.13 26.4 D 0.13 26.8 D - - - R 0.02 10.5 B 0.02 10.6 8 0,02 10.6 B School House Road at Depot Lane NB LT 0.00 7.7 A 0.00 7.7 A 0,01 7.7 A - - - EB. LR 0.08 10.4 B 0.08 10.4 B 0.11 10.7 B Main Road(NYS 2$)at Cmlvn Land Road EB L9' 0.01 8.8 A 0,01 e.9 A 0.01 9.0 A - - - SB LR 0.03 14.7 B 0.04 15,1 C 0,04 15,0- B Main Road(NYS 25)at Highland Road EB LT 0.00 8,6 A 0.01 8,6 A 0.01 8,7 A - - - SB LR 0,06 25.0- C 0,06 26.4 . D 0,07 23.6 C Main Road(NYS 25)at North Street EB LT 0.00 92 A 0.00 9,3 A 0.00 9,4 A - - - SB LR 0.05 21] C 0.06 22.8 C 0.06 25.9 D Site LT NIA NIA 7 3 A Driveway at School House Road EB 0.01 - - - SB LR 003 . 9.0 A Existing Condition ency/Co. fVelson & Pope nneiaeeuu Crownland to Performed 11/1/2007 Jurisdiction alysis Time Period Existing AM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 /_ (Adjusted) Description Main Rd(NYS 25) at Crown Land Rd(Ex AM Peak Hr Adjusted) t Street: Main Road'(NYS 25) (No th/South Street: Crown Land Road =w tlon.OnentaUon: East-West (Study Perod (hrs): 025 .�.�_��i �..___.._..�<. ....k ,. e.. � .._ ..-- ��w�F�����^ .,-.Ka,..:x y�"Tz"e ✓"vnrc3.^�h z?$S ;�C�°r°R��-��,9*.�� �.�*��� }or Street Eastbound I Westbound `J vement 1 2 �_ 3 4 5 �— 6 L T lume (vehfh) 2 449 I I ( 536 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 I 0.81 I 0.81 I h/h urlFlow Rate, HFR 2 554 0 0 I E61 i rce t Heavy Vehicles 2 I - I 0 dian Type _ Undivided Channelized I p I n les 0 1 _ I 0 — 1 I 0 nfiguration LT stream Signal p I I 0 TR nor Street Northbound Southbound rvement �_ 7 8 9 _� 10 11 12 J L T R L I T J— R lume veh/h) 4 7 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 181 v Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 4 0 8 Heavy Vehicles 0 0 I p I 2 I 0 I —2 JI scent Grade (%) I 0 I 0 — �J aredApproach N N Storage I � 0 � I 0 F Channelized 0 n I nes 0 0 0 0 0 0J �nfiguration LR - )proach Eastbound WestboundM Northbound Southbound avement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ine Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 2 I I I I 12 I � (m) (veh/h) 927 321 0.00 0.04 i% queue length 0.01 0.12 ontrol Delay (s/veh) 8.9 16.7 J DS A C -)proach Delay (s/veh) I - I 16.7 :)proach LOS C mit©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 426 PM agency/Co. Nelson &Pope 11/1/2007 Jurisdiction )ate PerformedE-Xist ling M Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 �nalyslssTime Period 'rect eseTlp R MaL/2�tl f afgrim L�hd'Ft {E r f�lf1 P ej 1f Atllf�st�d ° n asNTestSfreet Main Road 5j .-: SoflthSt - 7ee "C)gwn l arrd'F2oad .. �_ hterse-ction Orientation-, East West tud- SPeriod (hrs) 0.25: Na or Street Eastbound Aovement R L T R T eWh E7 P Fa.a.,.. -.. . .., .., .: �., .a.., ♦�T�GhanleIzed ,. 0 � 1' 0" 0 1 0 _ 'anes 0TR :Configuration LT 0 U stream Sk nal li 0 inor Street Northbound Southbound — —Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ L T R L T — R 201 Volume — ✓oveh/h) lumeeak-Hur Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate;HFR 0 0 0 2 0 10 eveh/hp 2 0__�- 2 percent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 N `=tared Approach N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O -_anes onfiguration a. Quee: eg. :ha e. 4pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 1 Lane Configuration LT LR_J_ L 12 12 v (veh/h) C (m) (veh/h) 0.0. 393 0 f1 0.03111C L_ 95% queue length 0.04 0.09 Control Delay (slveh) $.$ 14.4 -LOS A t3 14.4 Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS opyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS-T"` Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 .alysc ror�rvi irneisecuuu - lency/Co. Nelson & Pope Crownland Jurisdiction ate Performed 11/112007 Analysis Year 2007 ialysis Time Period Existing Sat Peak Hr(Adjust) - escri tion Main Rd(NYS 25) at Crown Land Rd (Ex Sat Peak HrAdjusted) s t Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Crown Land Road ets-ction Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0-25 hi !c el�vlumes an� LAjs�m nts� �' 's � �� � ' IM jor Street Eastbound Westbound _J wement 2 3 4 5 g L T -R-- L I T R Fume (veh/h) 5 574 _ 592 5 ak-Hour Factor PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,93 0.930.93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 5 617 0 0 636 5 �h/h) rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- - 0 - adian Type Undivided - Channelized J I 0� 1 -0 J nes _ 0 1 L-- -o 0 1 —p J )nflguration LT _� _ FR )stream Signal 0 1 0 J nor Street Northbound I Southbound _I wernent 7I �II 8 9 I 10 11 1p�2 1 T �o — L T J dume (veh/h) 2 11 :ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0-93 0.93 r Flow Rate, HFR I 0 0 0 I 2 0 I 1 y a ' I ^r Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 �rcent Grade (%) 0 0 J 3red Approach N N Storage 0 0 F Channelized 0 0 J Ines 0 0 0 0 0 p J �nfiguration LR 3proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement _ I 1 I 4 I 7 I 8 9 I . : 10 I 11 I 12 ane Configuration I LT I I I I I LR (veh/h) 5 I I I I I I 13 (m) (veh/h) 943 I I I I I 384 IJ C 0.01 I I I 0.03 I � i% queue length 0-02 I I 0.10 J ontrol Delay (s/veh) 8.8 14.7 :)S A B pproach Delay (s/veh) - - I 14.7 pproach LOS - - I B 'O©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS-Tu Version 5.21 Generated: 1115/2D07 4:28 Ptd i agency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction )ate Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2007 E%lsting AM Peak Hr arlalysl5 Tirrle Period (Atd). +: �r� ct scnpttofi ft21 a sum dE?cRM PeaiHF"A'd(t3sti ' _as7W.e'stStreet: Maln Rot (,, X25, _ diol 1Sbuf�i Sttde Fryrind Road r ntersection Orienta5on: East=West, Stud Period (hl d.25IM rt, r/e i Eastbouni3 - l „� .,_. Westou'id Mfa or Street 1 2 I 3 4 5 Aovement L T R L T I R 77 bay ( r 80 1 =antis D . 1 6 1. 0_. ,onfiguration LT TR U stream Si nal 0 0 `Minor Street Northbound Southbound `Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Jolume (veh/h 9 5 — L .eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate;HFR 0 0 0 10 0 6 .,veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 _�_ Percent Grade (%) 0 0 =fared Approach N -- Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 _antis 0 0 0 0 0 0 _._ . _ _ LR Configuration tile_ e Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 1'I 1 Lane Configuration LT LF: v (veh/h) 7 16 C (m) (veh/h) 955 — ' _215 0- 2 18 vlc 0.01 I 0-O6 1_195% queue length 0.02 0..19 Control Delay (s/veh) 8-8 19.3 LOS A yC� Approach Delay (s/veh) – – 19.3 — C Approach LOS – – — opyrighl®2005 University or Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/512007 is • Intersection Main Rd (NYS 25) at Highland ;ency/Co. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction +te Performed 1111/2007 Existing PM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 :2 lysis Time Period (Adjusted) AgWescription Main Rd (NYS 25) at Highland Rd (Ex PM Peak Hr Adjusted) s t Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Highland Road _J rsection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0:25 ijor Street Eastbound Westbound wement 1 2 34 5 g f R L lame (veh/h) 5 560 605 12 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 urly:h/h}Flow Rate, HFR 5 602 0 0 650 I 12 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 – � �� 0 I _ __ ;dian Type Undivided --JI Channelized 0 � n nes 0 1 0 0 mfiguration LT L I — f --TR_ _J )stream Signal 0 f 0 _J nor Street Northbound Southbound —J werrlent 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L I T R J )fume (veh/h) 6 g ;ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 J - Flow Rate, HFIR 0 0 0 6 0 6 Heavy Vehicles 0 I 0 0 2 0 2 �rcent Grade (%) 0 0 aredApproach N Storage 0 Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 n I Ines 0 0 0 0 0 =0—J onfig u ration LR_ - oproachEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT tLR (veh/h) I 5 12 (m) (veh/h) �_ 927 265 C 1 0.01 1 0.05 _jr � 5% queue length 0.02 0.14 ontrol Delay (s/veh) 8.9 192 OS A C pproach Delay (s/veh) – 19.2 J pproach LOS - – I I C _J �O 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/512007 4:30 PM v,o,y o• agency/Co. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction )ate Performed i 1/i/2007I.Apalysis Year 2007 aoalysis Trine Period f)ustfing Sat Peak Hr(Adjust), a y 'ro ac Qescl tloh Main fid LVYS 25) at Highland Rd (E 5a Freak Hr 4d listed) rgw as/Uf�e Sir et. N(?ln o� � ¢ rtht t eeghtai3d f#ead nterseetldn Orientation: as flles—_ 'W"n—le o$ ✓ G = usu _ Nx x£ Wesfbound Vla or Eastbqund . ,. Sfrea 4.° . r 5 -- ULovement 1 2 3 6 L T R L T R 5E 604 4$1 8 "° P,Oe Liao t • •t � � a ,:�'F.- '.'enc-"-- 'u�.a ,�..�wr� �,'� ell x 0 e 0`- f7 �. '�'ontiguration - LT - TR pstream Signal 0 0 Northbound Southbound _Minor Street 10 11 12 Movement 8 9 _E L T R L L— R - 10 0 _ Volume (veh/h 0 88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF _Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 11 0 0 cce e 0 rcent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 r�T Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR ;.onfigurationWill , ., _ en-t4 bio#fie t pproach Eastbound Westbound ,Northbound Southbound movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 LR 1 Lane Configuration LT v (veh/h) 5 C (m) (veh/h) 1015 #: iiqli _ v/c 0.00 O.OE�— L85% queue length 0.01 0-18 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 I 25-0 —I— OS A C—L 25.0 .Approach Delay (slveh) I _ i I C — [Approach LOS - oPYrighl®2005 university ii of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/512007 L ff • L _ I I I IC I JUULIVII IVI CIII RU (IV rJ CJ) al brl%lfn at encylCo. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction to Performed 11/1/2007 Existing AM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 clysis Time Period Adjusted i, Description Main Road at Griffin Street(Existing AM Peak Adjusted) s( t Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street Griffin Street >_r {ion Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 jor Street Eastbound^ _� _ Westbound vement 1 2 --3 4 5 _ L T R I L T R l Fume (veh/h) 56 405 482 5� ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.833 1 0.83 0.83II 0883 urly Flow Rate, HFR 67 487 0 0 560 102 :h/h) f rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 1 0 I -� =dian Type Undivided Chznnelized �II I 0 I 0 nes J�0—� 1--- 0 0 I 0 J 'nfiguration LT I TR j stream Signal 0 0 nor Street Northbound _ Southbound wement 7 8 9 10 1 11 12 L I T R I L I T R 1 fume (veh/h) _ 39 42 :2k-Hour Factor PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 J Flow Rate, HFR0I 0 0 46 0 50 AII er Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 ;rcent Grade (%) 0 0 wed Approach N N Storage 0 I 0 L Channelized 0 0 Ines 0 0 0 1 0 J �nfiguration L R Tae.e _en t• ndkLe ebb.,. _ecv�ce5 1s )proach I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound J ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT L R—] (veh/h) 67 46 50 (m) (veh/h) 911 176 481 C 0.07 0.26 0.10 S% queue length I 0.24 1.00 0.35 ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.3 32.5 13.4 DS I A D g oproach Delay (s/veh) — 22.5 J oproach LOS — — _ I C - ht©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 4:31 PM kgency/Co. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction )ate Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2007 Exlshng PM Peak Hr MalyslsT'Ime Period / c as A'! ?raz o cQescnRtlor a/rt : a :cr Sree �31s"°t ng'P� �dloste�l "�'4 x astV/wds Street" Main Road(i7YS-02-5)< -' I /3oLf `S rtet �ifFT Sfret rttersec_tion Orientation: East V)!est St�� Period(hrs 0,25 t E tS ✓E t^Ea.eb��Ti�Os�d .a� �__.r. ' _- ._ _ ., ;.'_.._ u,._.. _<__ •�.. ., .-,.-ta .�,�_. .. altit Street Eastbound" V1lestbourid " ,Aovement L T R L T R Ann4���� ,.e y sa._ -:•yh „- s-F�xc " s szi. m ` n 1 "`" "' ''SK". "ny ' @ fa .,,.,, .. .. «. vww. 'w. r—+ k.— M.w' ,••^`W _anes _,^onfiguration Ll 0 TR Upstream Si nal 0 ':Minor Street Northbound Southbound 8 9 10 11 zvlovement 7 L T R L T R R LVolume (veh/h 21 33 — eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Houfly Flow Rate, HFR 0 p 0 23 0 37 veh/h ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 N lared Approach N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0— CLanes - 0 0 0 1 0 1 configuration L R Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 4 8 9 L 11 11 ovement 1 Lane Configuration LT �� v (veh/h) 32 23 _� 3 C (m) (vehlh) 902 160 I 4; v/c 0.04 0.14 _� 0. L<g5a/ queue length 0.11 0.48 I 0. 31.2 1: Control Delay (slveh) 9.1 {[ LOS A D ` 20.3 Approach Delay (s/veh) C I Approach LOS – -- Generated: 17/5/2007 L:opyright®2005 university of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 �ncy/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction e Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2007 clysis Time Period Existing Sat Peak Hr(Adjust) -' Description Main Road at Griffin Street(Existing Sat Peak Adjusted) J -st Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: GriiFn Street J r n Orientation: East-West Istudy Period (hrs): 0.25 a or Street Eastbound Westbound ✓ement 2 3 4 5 g J . L.__]___L ...1 R L T __R I ume (veh/h) 34 ( 547 j 556 101 ik-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 _ 0.95 �_ 0.95 irly Flow Rate, HFR 35 575 0 I 0 585 106 h/h) cent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 0 - J than Type Undivided J Channelized —1 �- 0 1 0 I les 0 1 0 0 1 0 figuration i LT L TR stream Signal 0 0 _J ior Street Northbound Southbound J vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 �II _— �— L T R I L I T R_ J utne (veh/h 62 56 ak-Hour Factor, PHF _ 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 R wiy Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 65 0 62 eavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 J riGrade (%) I _ 0 — -- 0 red Approach I N I N Storage 0 0 _ J Channelized 0 0 J nes 0 0 0 1 0 1 nfiguration L q proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound J )vement 1 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Configuration LT L R veh/h) 35 65 62 (m) (veh/h) 904 175 477 0.04 0.37 0.13 % queue length. 0.12 1.59 0.44 )ntrol Delay (s/veh) 9.1 I 372 I 13.7 )S A I I I E I I B )proach Delay (s/veh) 25.7 )proach LOS 1 - = I D I ryright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 4:31 FM Holy gency/Ca. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction ate Performed 11/1/2007 `Analysts Year 2007 Existing AM Peak Hr na� Time Penod Aii; (gdjustedr xss s rolett DescnpttanK h]atn ted fN 2 at(Horth St r xtsGngN71r FfrAdittAAA b"a ` astlWest Street:- `Neill Ro`aii`(NYS 25) {�1°o-``W5bU S`Fre& North St e`O- ItersQcfl§n Onentattont East Staff# Penodx(:hrs 0. r re ii i _T I d its :m s Eastbound' Westbound to or Street ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 n + L TY X 0` T.anes onfiguration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 'Minor Street Northbound Southbound _ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vehlh) 0 1 Peak-Hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0:80 Hourly_Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 0 0 0 1 veh/h percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 'Flared Approach N N --- Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 — Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -Confi uration LR IfiIDeIe...E _E t_ . _. .:-� erof~Se Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 q 7 8 9 10 11 Lane Configuration LT LR [v (veh/h) 2 1 �— C (m)(veh/h) 864 417 I v/c 0.00 0.00 — L 95% queue length 0.01 0.0-1 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 13.7 -- LOS A B�— i 7 Approach Delay (s/veh) 13. — Approach LOS -- – B — :opyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS-TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 < L 40 e l net Juuuu11 ivies l r u tiv 1J za) at ivorm Jr ency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction :te Performed 11/1/2007 Existing PM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 alysis Time Period (Adjusted) Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at North St(Existing PM Peak Hr Adjusted) _J t Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: North Street rtion Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 htclel/oiurr3es anc� lci ist ntsx jor Street L Eastbound Westbound J )vement � 1 2 _—� 3 4 _ 5 6 L T R L T R lume (veh/h) - 1 637 638 9 2k-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 uriy Flow Rate, HFR 1 699I 0 0 I— 701 9 — :h/h) 111--- J rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 - — 0 — Aian Type Undivided Channelized 10 1 0 nes 1 1 0 0 1 0 )nfiguration L T TR - _stream Signal 0 �_ 0 nor Street Northbound I Southbound Dvement '7 8 9 10 11 12 L � T _ R_ L _�_ T R ;@!<-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 'y Flow Rate, HFR 0 I 0 0 1 0 J o J Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 scent Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach N N Storage 0 0 J T Channelized 0 p J 3nes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . onfigurabon LR RIS 1 --e.,e �a_n�d_ Level">of`S�ervice - pproach f Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration L LR J�J (veh/h) 1 1 (m) (veh/h) 689 153 J�J 'c 0.00 0.01 5% queue length 0.00 0.02 L� ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.1 I I I 28.7 I ' OS A I D pproach Delay (s/veh) I I — I -28 7 pproach LOS I — — I I D yj�t©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS-T Version 5.21 Generated- Ni52007 4.32 PM agency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jui aun uv Date Performed 11/1/07 Analysis Year 2007 n 4na�yslyTlme Peod Erfshng Sat Peak Hr(Ad/ust) >, ect De�cnptlA� Malty Rd(NyS-25).at Forth St Ex/sUng Sats eak HrAd/usfed) ase"st S rge ._ lt9 m R`oaNT"Sth Sir e#'' 1Vorth stFe ; rif�e{P,sectwn OrjeptaUon l yeast gWest_y r 1 t g epod(hrs 0 2 J C , 01 �OCS�?ld" Yj 1J.4 'IYrP.f�LS _ 7T'�i`r+i .t`�ty� T " Eastbound V�les tbour_d iVla oi�S£reet' 1` 2 L'. Movement �' L I T R L 1 T R Uoluttle:;(veh/h} „_ 635 67.7 1 4 N;ouractof,PHF t F 0:96 0 94 0 90 0 90 OJO 0190 " rl W. 3 d'. 752 75 0 Maniehz2d: 0 T ,n onfguration, � ..- T TR _Jp am Signal 0 D_ _ _Minor Street Northbound Southbound 'Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 — _ L T R L T R 'Volume (veh/h 5 7 — Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 5 0 7 (veh/h - - 0 0 2 0 2 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 percent Grade (%) 0 0 N N Flared Approach 0 Storage 0 RT Channelizea 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 CConfiguration - LR p e th. tade #SekY ee ,4 proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 �_ 1 Lane Configuration LL�12R�_L v (veh/h) 4 I � l C (m) (veh/h) 857 227—L— v/c 0.00 I 0.05 L95% queue length 0.01 0.17 — Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 211'7 LOS A �— Approach Delay (s/veh) I - - f 21'7 Approach LOS - I C opyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS-T^' Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 L �/ • ency/Co. Nelson & Pope c icy w Lr, te Performed 11/1/2007 Jurisdiction alysis Time Period Existing AM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 (Adjusted) J Description Main Rd(NYS 25) at Depot Ln (Existing AM Peak Hr Adjusted) t Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Depot Lane sraT-Tcion Orientation: East-West .. Study Period (hrs): 0.25 _J � -�- jor Street Eastbound Westbound vement 2 3 4 5 6 . J J L I T I R I — L T R ume (veh/h) 59 399 532 50 J 3k-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0-82 0.82 ,idy Flow Rate, HFR 71 4860 0 648 EO cent Heavy Vehicles 1 0 - d_ian Type _ _Undivided J Channelized 0 0 es --- --- 1 1—�- ° ° - 1 0 nfiguration L ��TR stream Signal 0 0 nor Street Northbound Southbound vement- 7 _ 8 9 10 11 12 J - - I L T I R I L — T —R J lume (veh/h) 38 68 J al Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 _ 'v Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 46 0 82 — r Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 J rcent Grade (%) I 0 0 J 3red Approach N N Storage 0 I 0 Channelized I 0 0 nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 )nfiguration LR la ,zqueve4en; hQanrleue7:o. Servide . ' 3proach I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound_ ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 1112 the Configuration L LR (veh/h) I 71 J I 128 (m) (veh/h) 891 275 —J 0.08 1— 0.47 >%° queue length 0.26 2.32 �J ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.4 29.0 OS A D �J pproach Delay(s/veh) - - 29.0 pproach LOS - I D '-Iht©2005 University of Florida,All Riahts Reserved - HCS+TM Version 521 Generated- 1115/2007 433 PM 6 Agency/Co. Nelson & Pope – Date Performed 11/1/2007 _ Jurisdiction Analysis:Time Period Existing PM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 _ ?' - Zctr_ es, npUo Malin f d(tCl St25 af'f 5epot Ln (Ex st�ogEl;M Peal l p�Atijustetl) r t a Eas est Street- Main`Roaci(ly NOh`1Sou�h°S`treet� t7epot Lar��r ntersection Orientation:, €ast-West d Penod.(hrs)'. 025 Ma or Street :vldvement. trdllzed` Lanes= w_ 1 -0 -- onfiguration L T TR upstream Si nal 0 0 "Minor Street Northbound Southbound _Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R _ IF Volume(vehih) 51 49 _ ,Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hou[ly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 59 0 56 11 Nveh/h —1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 r=lared Approach N N �_, Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0— a n e sU _anes0 0 0 0 0 0 C on iguratton LR >.e a F :1 e e t a 3 - gel of e,• jt Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 1 Lane Configuration L LR�_ v (veh/h)v Vme (veh/h)E��40 186 v/c 0-05 0.49 95% queue length 0.15 3-49 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 51,4 LOS A Approach Delay Delay (s/veh) 51.4 pproach LOS P ,opyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+T" Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 L • ency/Co. Nelson & Pope Ln Jurisdiction to Performed 11/1/2007 alysis Time Period Existing Sat Peak Hr(Adjust) Analysis Year 2007 L Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Depot Ln (Existing Sat Peak HrAdjusted) AfMt Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Depot Lane AWon Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 sa - FIICI@a5)U_II'iP_5�311�..A_.�J3i3�i'i�l�e`I1tS. .�k=�.�vri; jor Street Eastbound I Westbound vement1 1 2 3___L 4 1 5 1 6 J L T R L T R J ume (veh/h) 50 611 661 54 3k-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 096 urly Flow Rate, HFR I 52 636 0 0 688 5g h/h) J cent Heavy Vehicles 2 I 0 — than Type Undivided J Channelized 0 1--. I e Ss - ---� 1 - 1 --� -°-- 0 I--1 0 J nfiguration L T TR stream Signal 0 0 J nor Street Northbound Southbound )vement �_ 7 8 9 10 11 12 L I T R _I L T R lume (veh/h) 61 95 J ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96_ 0.96 0.96 0.96 --'v Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 63 0 98 r eavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 rr eenf Grade (%) I 0 0 lred Approach I I N N Storage I 0 0 - Channelized 0 0 nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 >nfigu ration LR .L N-0:01 e e th an%Mevv 9 . lefie )proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound )vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Configuration LLR J veh/h) 52 I I I I 161 (m) (veh/h) I 864 I I I I I I 231 I� 0.70 19 54% queue length 4. I J )ntrol Delay (s/veh) 9.4 50.1 )S A F )proach Delay (s/veh) — — I 50.1 )proach LOS — F =Iht©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS-T4 Version 521 Generated: 1115/2007 434 PM agency/Co. Nelson a rope )ate Performed 1111,12007 Juri diction �Xlstrng AM Peak Hr Analyses Year 2007 knalpis,Time Preriod Ad used) r _ . .._.., ._, . s >... > :_ ( 1 W-03 ` a° iEitgAMtPea�c/djscr :ast/West ut�"3eStreet: School House Road ntersecyon Orientation Nosh South Study Period,(hrs). 0.25 Major Street Northbound ,�, outfibolind Jlovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R 11 - 3 _ 1 a ' T' 0,. 3onfiguration LT TR U stream Signal 0 0 `Minor Street Eastbound Westbound 'Moement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R tolyume veh/h 23 12 _ ..;Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 0 16 0 0 0 -percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Creared Approach N N — Storage 0 .0 — RT Channelized 0 0 — -"Lanes - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Configuration LR Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 S 9 .10 11 T –Lane Configuration LT LR� v (veh/h) 6 47 C (m) (veh/h) 1379 733 Vic 0.00 0.06 950/6 queue length 0.01 0'21 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 10-2 CLOS '4 Approach Delay (slveh) 10-2 — Approach LOS – B J — opyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+7M Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 L 0 ency/r_;o. lvelson &mope Lane I o Performed 11/1,12007 Jurisdiction afysis Time Period Existing PM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 (Adjused) Descriptior, School House Rd at Depot Lane (Existing PM Peak Adjusted) J 31 st Street: School House Road INorlh/South Street: Depot Lane _J ron Orientation North-South IStudy Period (hrs) 0.25 icleVol'0OV a dAd�uAIaLIN-011-'18.1 ;. Y ,or Street Northbound Southbound _J vement 1 2 3 4 5 g R L lume (veh/h) 2 82 — 89 - -- ak-HourFactor, PHF 0.73 0.73 I� 0.73 0.73 0.73 073 J urly Flow Rate, HFR h/h) 2 I 412 f 0 0 121 15 II scent Heavy Vehicles 2 - - 0 than Type Undivided Channelized I I 0 0 les 0 1 0 0 1 nfiguration LT stream Signal 0 0 —� nor Street Eastbound Westbound vement - = 7 8 r 10 1 — 12 R L T L � T R fume (veh/h) 26 10 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0,73 y Flow Rate, HFR 35 0 13 0 0 0 � 0 :r Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 p J To, Grade (%) 0 0 J 3red Approach N I UN Storage 0 F Channelized 0 nnes 0 0 0 0p mfiguration LR I [lay-laeeS , iENJ )proach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound wement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,ne Configuration LT LR "veh/h) 2 qg (m) (veh/h) 1448 784 s 0.00 0.06 i% queue length 0. 0.20 �ntrol Delay (slveh) 7.5.5 g;g JS A A I :)proach Delay (s/veh) - - 9.9 :)p roach LOS - - A -ht©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 1115/2007 4:34 PM ,I• agency/Co. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction 11(1/2007 2007 )ate Performed Analysis Year �rSalysls Tirne Period EXistittg Sat Peak Hr(Ad/ustj rro D s nptto School o se R aFI)epo Cane YE tstrng�SeGPeak diffikf astiWs_ Street School ouse`RQa, " "`Y �1$ �Srouth- tf eet T0 'of Laney — � ntersection Orientation: North South Stud`. period (hrs . 0.25 -- $ � .w- Najor Street yaoith6ound 4I- oXi In and 1Aovement 1 2 I 3 R L L I T� R y n . U is a size =arses' 0 R' Configuration LT 0 0 U stream Si nal Westbound Minor Street Eastbound -'Movement 7 8 g 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h 30 19 =Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0"80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 0 23 0 00 veh/h 0 2 0 0 0 t ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 00 Percent Grade (%) N `fared Approach N 0 Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 — Configuration LRrl Ds a. ue� th o rv.�e. Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Approach T Movement 1 4 7 8 g 10 11 LR Lane Configuration LT 60 v (veh/h) 4 C (m) (veh/h) 1358 730--�— L 0.00 0.Ot V/c � 0-01 0.2? g5% queue length 10 ,l Control Delay (S/veh) 7.7 LOS A B 10.41 Approach Delay (s/veh) - B Approach LOS ri ht B 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS,TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 ;opY g C � 3ency/Co. Nelson & Pope Lane ate Performed 11/1/2007 Jurisdiction talysis Time Period Existing AM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2007 (Adjusted) A Description Middle Road (CR 48) at Depot Lane (Existing AM Adjusted) 0ast Street: Middle Road (CR 48) North/South Street: Depot Lane tion Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ajor Street _ _ Eastbound Westbound Dvement 1 1 2 L_3 4 1 5 1 6 J L T i R L T R flume (veh/h) 12 654 50 63 638 4 :ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Burly Flow Rate, HFR 13 734 56 70 716 ah/h) �rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 1 2 -- _ adian Type Raised curb J L Channelized anes �_-- 1 � 2 � _1 2 1 �. Dnfiguration � L � T R L T � R nstream Signal 0 0 inor Street Northbound _ Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 L T I R I T R J Dlume (veh/h) 61 14 65 -_1 6 14 10 J yak-Hour Factor PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 -!y Flow Rate, HFR 68 15 73 6 15 11 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 erc nt Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach I I N I N J Storage 0 I I I 0 T Channelized 1 1 anes 0 1 1 0 1 1 ohfiguration LT R LT R eja.,. Q.-eue-. ern < '.:._n bevel ofSe .ice pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound lovement I 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration L L LT R LT R (veh/h) 13 70 83 73 21 11 - (m) (veh/h) 880 867 224 630 199 638 Ic 0.01 0.08 0.37 0.12 0.11 0.02 5% queue length 0.04 0.26 1.62 I 0.39 0.35 0.05 ;ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.2 9.5 30.2 11.5 25.2 10.7 OS f A A D B D 1 g ,pproach Delay (s/veh) 21.5 202 ,pproach LOS C C Wight©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TTS Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 4:35 PN _ • kgency/Co. Nelson &rope Juri 11/1/2007 sdiction date Performed A al sisYear,, 2007 BustW PM Peak Hr 4� Y arialyslsTlme Period a s (,4d/usted) rro ec L gs IP ori Middl 'Roa 4 at DEp i%P' (l=X_lsti It�l At/j Sted FJoit'i( ou � t�r Street De o�lan>V_ -a°s"t/West Street: Middle Road (0148 Shid PEriod (hrs). 025 ntef.sedionOrientation EastWest_ Ma gY' Yt�et. Eastbound- Movement 1 2 3 4 _ S _ 6 .,.F. • �-< _,A� ��� ::. Rarse cur �' '-�--`�-�_ .y _. � "�nP..<._n.. ry•r1 '.a;<•- -¢e trvysb ^FTe"A'ap.' x>elze _ 1 Lanes L T�_ R -Configuration L T R Upstream Si nal 0 0 — Northbound Southbound `Minor Street 9 10 11 12 'Movement 7 8 — L T R L T R olume veh/h 54 13 48 2 6 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 55 13 49 2 6 13 veh/h 2 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 0 0 Percent Grade (%) N Flared Approach 0 — 0 0 Storage 1 RT Channelized 1 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 i R Configuration LT R LT : ,Wall. eel Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11� Lane Configuration L L LT R LT F v (veh/h) 18 39 68 49 8 1 C (m) (veh/h) 879 907 252 655 227 —L 6: vlc 0.02 0.04 0.27 0.07 U.04 _L 0. - 95%queue length 0.06 0.13 1.06 0.24 0.11 _� 0. _ Control Delay (s/veh) 9 2 9.1 24.5 10.9 21.4 1( A A C B LOS 18.8 14.8 Approach Delay (s/veh) 6 — _ C -Approach LOS - — Copyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 521 Generated`. 11/5/2007 Lane ency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction to Performed 11/112007 Analysis Year 2007 alysis Time Period Existing Sat Peak Nr(Adjust) Description Middle Road(CR 48) at Depot Lane (E)isting Sat Adjusted) >�t Street: Middle Road (CR 48) (No th/South Street Depot Lane J Alfion Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 S5 htclg 17oJutnesanc! Ad usrnertts jor Street _ Eastbound _ Westbound _J vement � 1--� 2 —� 3 I — 4 5 6 L T 1 _R L J T R ume (veh/h) 31 I 560 92 I _ 83 1 607 4 3k-Flour Factor PHF 0.92 I 0-92 I 0.92 0.92 ( 0.92 0.92 urly Flow Rate, HFR 33 608 99 90 659 h/h) 4 cent Heavy Vehicles 2 I 2 - J than Type Raised curb Channelized les 1 1 2 I—_ 1 - --J--- —�--' - J nfiguration _ L I T _ I R �L I T I R J stream Signal I 0 I 0 1 jorStreet 1 Northbound _ Southbound vement 7 I 8 9 1 10 _12 L _ T R L T R l !ume (veh/h) 32 25 65 I 8� 14 11 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 1 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 "i Flow Rate, HFR 34 2770 8 15 11 r �' eavy Vehicles 2 I 2 2 2 2 2J I rcent Grade (%) 0 0 __J +red Approach N N J Storage 0 0 -Channelized nes 0 1 1 0 1 1 nfiguration LT R LT q )a" (1ueoeen�th "ndL>evel�oervce +sU - - _. �. _ NMI - proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound wement I 1 I 4 I 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Configuration I L I L LT R LT R veh/h) 33 90 61 70 23 11 (m) (veh/h) f 925 I 966 1 225_J 692 203 666 0.04 I 0-09 0.27 0.10 I 0.11 I I 0.02 % queue length I 0.11 I 0.31 1.06 I I 0-34 0.38 1�1 0.05 >ntrol Delay (s/veh) 9.0 9.1 26.8 10.8 25.0 I 10.5 )S A A D B C g 1 )proach Delay (s/veh) 18.3 ' 20.3 )proach LOS - C C �,ht©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tt� Version 521 Generated, 1115/2007 4:36 PM (• A44 .'. '�r'��-"y� - uF t�. •,� �.,t_:� 7 '�`"'� .FT � �` � 1� �"-'�fi'�r�� a'�"" ' '' : ' lz�"��_ , ��T 1 i • No Build Condition ;ency/Co. Nelson & Pope UIUW"tduu Jurisdiction Ae Performed 11/1/2007 ialysis lime Period No Buifd AM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2009 Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Crown Land Rd (No Build) J �s st Street: Main Road (NYS 25) INorthiSouth Street: Crown Land Road J elation Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 } `S.� �' z�>� �c�sN. "l =h �7e \/olne_saneiAc! usm` ens�. :�tc ..1 1. _ _.xa,. WIN .-"��`E.:MOI R ilorStreet ( Eastbound _ Westbound J )vement 1 L 2 3 4 5 6 L T�— R - L - T R J ,fume (veh/h) 2 _ 465 555 —1 :2k-Hour Factor, PHIF 0.81 0.8 i 0.8 i _0.81 0.81 _0.81 Yurly Flow Rate, HFR 2574 0 0 685 1 .h/h) scent Heavy Vehicles _ 2 � - 0 :dian Type Undivided Channelized _ 0 1 0 I nes 0 0 - � 1 0 ;nfiguration LT- nal Tnal 0 inor Street Northbound mSouthbound_ eveent - - ---- / --8-- - - - 9--- �I 10 �_ 11-- 12J L �- T I R - L T R_- Aume veh/h) 4 7 ;ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 y Flow Rate, HFR „ 0 0 4 0 g .I�Heavy �0 0 0 2 0 2 f' arcent Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach N N Storage I 1 0 0 —� F Channelized 0 p ones 0 0 0 0 0 p I onfiguration LR pproach Eastbound Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound ovement 1 4 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 I 12 ane Configuration 1 LT I 1 1 1 LR 1 (veh/h) 2 -- 1 1 12 1J (m) (veh/h) 908 305 'c I 0.00 1 1 I I 1 0.04 1 1 5% queue length 0.01 0.12 J ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.0 17.3 1 Os 1 a I J I I I I� .pproach Delay (s/veh) 1 -- - 1 17.3 .pproach LOS I - 1 - 1 C Wight©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 1115/2007 4:41 PM lgency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction Yate Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 VKplysisTime Period Na Eutld PM Peak Hr s 'ro ec ©eml ftRaft main 2c (I Y° 2'a� at a- &Wn Land Rol - :ast/West Street Main Roaa(NS25 - N� USoutii Stteet Crown Land Road 1 nt4section Orienta)ion: East-WestIud' Period (hrs): 0.25 _ S. R � _ .. Na or Street East4ouun'd"` ` " Movement 4 5 5R T R L Uml�w�e`tleh/h) , AN, apes TRT I I I I Configuration LI Upstream Si nal 0 u Minor Street Northbound Southbound 9 11 Movement 8 10 L T R L T R R _ `Volume (veh/h) 2 10_ _Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 1 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 2 0 10 vehlh -Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 C'Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration LR be e e _e `/approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound l Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 L 1 -.Lane Configuration LT —J —R v (veh/h) 12 12 C (m) (veh/h) 945 377 v/c 0.01 0.03 __� '95% queue length 0.04 II 0,.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 I jLOS A B 141.9 Approach Delay (s/veh) — t3 Approach LOS opynght®2005 university of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS.Tid Version 521 Generated: 11/SY2007 � L L 0 ency/Co. Nelson &Pope uwnrartu Jurisdiction .te Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 alysis Time Period No Build Sat Peak Hr t Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Crown Land Rd(No Build) _Ji s t Street: Main Road (NYS 25) INorthiSouth Street: Crown Land Road =_melon Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 jor Street Eastbound I Westbound _J rvement 1 _ 2 3 4 5 6 R L lume (veh/h) 5 595 61 5—� ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 _0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 5 639 I 0 0 659 5 :h/h) rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 I — — _ 0 ,dian Type Undivided Channelized 0 nes — 0 I --- 0 0 nfiguration LT _ —J TR —I )stream Signal 0 — 1 0 — 1 nor Street Northbound Southbound wement _ 7 a �_ 9 _ 10 11 12 L T R I L T R I ,lume (veh/h) 2 11 !ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0-93 — 0.93 -ly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 2 0 „ I �r Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Tcent Grade (%) 0 0 3red Approach N N Storage 0 0 HE-- F Channelized 0 0 Ines 0 0 0 0 0 0 3nfiguration LR ela,,;,Qu eLetharad_ eve fie �c 3proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement ( 1 I 4 I 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration I LT I I I I I LR (veh/h) I 5 I I I 13 (m) (veh/h) I 925 I 368 J c 0.01 0.04 i% queue length 0.02 0.11 I ontrol Delay (s/veh) I 8.9 I I i5.1 J DS A C pproach Delay (s/veh) l I — 15.1 pproach LOS -- — _ I C J fight©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCs-T1A Version 521 Generated: 11!512007 4:42 PM agency/Co. Nelson &Pope )ate Performed 11/1/2007 AnalysisYear2009 �gesys{s Tt#rae Penod N© guild AM Peak Hr 'ro p on Il I RaI UAVA 25 at /ghland Rd (No 8ufld)f.; Nnith p S er eG astNe" tret afnftgsl1� 2b� s ntersection CSnentatlon. est t S#fid , Period.(rrs 0 2 q, _ ,P 4 /e c o U 1,es a '_a` ts � ?t Najo�Street_ `:��� ='Eastbound �, ,� ""(/`�IesEboui3 " Movement 1 — 2 3 4, L T R L T R Jo9urni�4 (hs } z; 481 AM x - L�arlest ,onfigura(ion LT I �. _ TR pstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h 9 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 ='sourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 10 0 6 Veli/h percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0� 0 0— — -RT Channelized Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration LR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound -Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11= Lane Configuration LT I LF� I v (veh/h) / lei C: (m) (veh/h) 93/ 2,54 , v/c 0.01 —06 95% queue length 0.02 0.20 Control Delay (s , Neh) 8.9 1 — LOS I A t� Approach Delay (s/veh) – 20.1 Approach LOS C opyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 on to Performed Nelson 0 Pope Analysis Y aePerformed 11/1/2007 IAnalysisYear 2003 ialysis Time Period No Build PA? Peak Hr sect Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Highland Rd (No Build) lest Street. Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Highland Road _J e `ion Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ��j�cle �/ot i esan�AdtustrNbz-h s ��_ MM,--- +jar Street I Eastbound Westbound ;vement 1 2 3 4 —L I T R L I T R lume (veh/h) 5. 580 627 I 12 :ak-Hour Factor PHF I 0.93 0.930.93 0.93 ( 0.93 0.93 J turfy Flow Pate, HFP. �h/h) 5 623 0 I 0 --674 12 :rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 ( I I 0 I _ dian Type I Undivided _ Channelized 0 p nes 0 1 0 0 1 0 —I )nfiguration I LT I I I TR )stream Signal f 0 0 _J :nor Street Northbound I Southbound wement7 8 9 10 11 12 _ I L T I R I L I T R glume (veh/h) 6 6 J ;ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 -urly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 I 0 6 0 g -h/h) � J t Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 . Grade (%) 0 0 J ared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IJ T Channelized 0 0 3nes 0 0 0 0 0 p onfiguration LR —J{ NEW a eft a tF ,Fanev 1 0 ice pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 . 12 ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 5 12 (m) (veh/h) 908 251 �J 'c 0.01 0.05 5% queue length 0.02 0.15 ontrot Delay (s/veh) 9.0 20.1 _I OS I A I I I I I C I II pproach Delay (s/veh) I I — I 20.1 J pproach LOS I — I — I I C �pyright 9 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.21 Generated: 11/512007 4:42 PM \gency/Co. Nelson &Pope uunsmcuu �atePerformed 11/1/2007 IPnalysisYear 2009 4nalysis e Period No Build at Peak Hr TimII ct t7esc Uoh Matn Rd(NYS 25�at Highland Rd (No Build „ r �N g T ast$tret F Main kZoad>[NY '5 Y outt � H1 h an ntersection Onentabon East TNest {S#uny Petlod {ltrs) 0 25--_ ala of Street Eastbound U(ovemenf I 1 2 3 4 5 __ 6. L I T R L T R Uolutne{�ehJh 5 626 498 8 pea� o �}fin P}{� 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 88 08 .R0 88 d .i "^.': x ^•4!e'x-- ,"iJ'"-rrs..ti'R« y `�a Fi 3 , :'� ELF �ar�nell��'• _ _ i 4 k�va -1 s�p+r H^w,•+•w . O rs-Ow a - <.T .-.�nr.w•n rta- �iy ` " �� a - .. _ _�.. _ •-, .� E es. 0� 1.. Configuration pstream Si nal 0 U Mmor Street Northbound Southbound_ ;Movement � 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h 10 0 - Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 -Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 11 0 0 ,veh/h --- PiPercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 j ercent Grade (%) 0 /N Flared Approach N 0 —� r-, 0 � Storage 0 0 RT Channelized — Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR r Configuration _ ' h ars gYe -e Approach Eastbound I Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 1 LR Lane Configuration LT ( (veh/h) 5 1 i 1 C (m) (veh/h) 999 179 v/c 0.01 0.06 _ 95% queue length 0.02 0 19� (-"Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 26.4�— LOS A y_ ,Approach Delay (slveh) - - 26.4 Approach LOS �opyrighi®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS-lm Version 521 Generated: 111512007 L' L ertcy/�O. ivursun a r-upu Jun�uicuort :te Performed 11/1/2007 I Analysis Year 2009 clysis Time Period No Build AM Peak Hr )Pct Description Main Road at Griffin Street(No Build) fest Street Main Road (NYS 25) N'oith/South Street: Griffin Street =r. on.Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 HIM olumesaidjusfimen a NMI jar Street Eastbound Westbound _J vement 1 ` 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R—J lune (veh/h) 58 420 !0. 9 88 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 3 0.83 I ugly Flow Rate, HFR 69 506 0 0 1 106 i :h/h) J rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 — 0 — Aian Type Undivided Channelized 0 0 nes 0 1 0 0 1 0 �nfiguration LT TR stream Signal 0 0 J nor Street Northbound Southbound wement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R J lume (veh/h) 40 44 J :ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83' wrly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 48 0 53 ;hjh)_ t Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2J Grade (%) 0 0 3redStorage Approach I N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 roes 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Tnfig u ration L R ala e el '�SeW09 )proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 _7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT L q (veh/h) 69 48 53 (m) (veh/h) 691 164 467 0.08 0.29 0.11 5°/a queue length 0-25 1.15 0.38 ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.4 35-8 13..7 DS A E LJI pproach Delay (s/veh) I I 24.2 J pproach LOS C pyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TII Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 4:43 PM agency/Co. iveison cF ruNc Date Performed 11/1/2007 __ I Analysls Year 2009 Analysis gn F enod No Build PM Peak rd De r tion Main Roadtat(5�iffin Street {No + Mort Soulli`S re tfitr e " " astHW€et t am R-0ad�jNl� 25�� �y ntersecUon �rie`ntahon East-West' k toy etlod Major,Street f Eastbound 115et6ound L T R L T R V.oiivme Fetrltl) y 300 593 48 4� Ig�. 731 fz � .-..-. U_ Ti"�f^mntinm ''G Laites . _ Configuration 0 -I Upstream Si nal 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 a 9 10 1 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 22 34 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 24 0 38 (Veh/h — rercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 ? ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N 0 � Storage 0 0 r1RT Channelized_ 0 0 0 1 D 1 Lanes 0 0 rl� L R 1Configuration _ By _ pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 'Movement • 1 4 _7 8 Lane Configuration LT L� F (veh/h) 33 2 3 C (m) (veh/h) 882 149 I 4< v/c 0.04 0.16 0. 95% queue length 0.12 0.56 I 0- Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 33.7 —L 1: LOS A D �- Approach Delay (s/veh) – 21.6 C Approach LOS opyright 02005 university of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+iM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 j L L ency/Go. Nelson &Nope Junsdlctlon to Performed 111112007 IAnalysisYear 2009 alysis Time Period No Build Sat Peak Hr ject Description Main Road at Griffin Street (No Build) Fest Street: Main Road (NYS 25) jNorthiSouth Street: Grifn Street J r�on Orientation East-West IStudy Period (hrs) 025 �1 2L'►TAe3�d'F'{� ]UStRt_ ... �. � �� a - .' , � br Street Easibound s Westbound vement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lume (veh/h) 35 567 576 105 ak-Hour Factor PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 urly Flow Rate, HFR 36 596 0I 0 606 hi10 /h) _ scent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 than Type Undivided —J Channelized 0 0 � res 0 i 0 0 1 0 ntlauration LT TR stream Signal 0 0 nor Street Northbound { Southbound )vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L I T R fume (veh/h) 64 61 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0-95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ,urly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 67 0 64 ;h/h t Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 :r Grade (%) I 0 0 3red Approach I I N N Storage 0 0 Channelized 0 D nes 0 0 0 1 0 1 >nfiguration L R Ia;SCQ�eveen t}�;and} e�eva ' Se i e — )proach� Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound :)vement 1 4 7 8 - 9 10 11 12 me Configuration LT L I R (veh/h) 36 67 64 (m) (veh/h) 885 164 462 0.04 0.41 0.14 i% queue length 0.13 1.80 0.48 Dntrol Delay (s/veh) 9.2 41.3 14.0 7S A E J B cproach Delay (s/veh) I — I I 28-0 ?proach LOS I I — D J gyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5 21 Generated: 11/5/2007 4:44 PM I ,gency/Co. Nelson & Pope uunaui�u n late Performed : 1:;1/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 ma}ys1 Time Pepo() No Budd AM Peak Hr { F� tlSes 'I orF- Main Rd(NYS 25) at JVo{ffi St(No Auld) asVest Stu In Road[N5) £ fJo "%So�tli 5t{eet 4it �c Y r _ 1Tersecton - ner fatlon East list ' St-0 Period hrs — 3 es ry?e OEM�� Aajorsfreet,, _ Eastbound V Westourid` ` ` 6o`veme'ot 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R T . R /otume-(tr�ehJh) 511 611 sr ' moo F z 0 8f7 r t 0 8fl 0 80 r;#s 0 80 0 80 7r7 �Tf�r ez d Fti 5 Laney = 0 1 TR� upstream Signal 0 0 Minor street Northbound Southbound Ulovement 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R _Volume (veh/h) 0 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 a80 0.80 J-iourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 0 0 0 1 veb/h _ "ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 li T Channelized 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 LR ~Configuration D.e a: Qe Leda, th anMOM e o e Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 1 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 2 1 _� C (m) (veh/h) 844 403 v/c 0.00 0.00 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 Control Delay (slveh) 9.3 14.0 LOS A Approach Delay (s/veh) - 14.0 Approach LOS opyrignt®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated. 11/5/2007 L -ncy/Co. Nelson & Pope - Jurisdiction i e Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 fI clysis Time Period No Build PM Peak Hr p t Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at North St(No Build) st Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: North Street rjWn Orientation: East-West Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 ' or Street I Eastbound Westbound _J /ement 1 2 f 3 4 5 f 6 -- I L _ T R L T R 1me (veh/h) 1 660 661 9 Ik-Hour Factor PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 irly Flow Rate, HFR 1 725 0 0 726 9 /h) cent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 - Sian Type Undivided Channelized I I 0 1I 0 J es 1 i 0 0 1 0 }figuration L T TR >tream Signal 0 0 1orStreet Northbound Southbound vement 7_ 8 9 10 11 }2 L I T R I L T Rl fume (veh/h) 1 0 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91L:—O 91 urly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 1 0 r--ih eavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Ed rMFrade (%) 0 I 0 ,red Approach I N I I NJ Storage 0 0 Channelized 0 0 nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,nfiguration LR �aaQ eue#-= h d eu .o -ereSENIOR ,proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound wement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Configuration. L LR veh/h) I 1 1 J (m) (veh/h) 870 143 0.00 0.01 queue length 0-00 0.02 J ,ntrol Delay (s/-,/eh) 9.1 30.4 J I �S I A I I I I I I D )proach Delay (s/veh) I — I I I 30.4 Dproach LOS — I I I D >ynght Co 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 4:45 PM 0 agency/Co. Nelson & Pope )ate Performed 1111/07 IQnalysis Year 2009 knalysisTime Period No Bulld$at Peak Hr 'r ct tion JYIa rt Rd(NYS 25) at North St(No Bulld) No7 ;5- `t 1 S ree North StraF?t ,MOMtretT Maenad( X — ntersec_tion Orientation East-West Study Period(firs) 0.25 r . .., 1N0Stl'Souhif Jla or Street Eastbound' Movement- ( 1 2 3 I 4 5 6^ t L T R L i T� R Joli�me-(ve.�h� r �rTM r 4�. � 8�8 � � 701 � 1 f� to acPL F; Q�(J 0`90 Q 90 0 90 U9Q �1� 9Q ,: t `a . - & Cloaru�i0'e'd Fars = Q T ( TR �onfigurafion Upstream Signal 0 0 inor street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 1 L T R L T R R 5 7 Volume veh/h {peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 . 0.90 0.90 0.90 - ' ourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 5 0 7 ,eh/h 0 I 0 0 2 0 2_ F ercent Heavy Vehicles -Ibercent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 '-RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR C:onfigutation pproach4� Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 1 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh/h) 4 12 LC (m) (veh/h) 838 214 f v/c 0.00 0.06 ::E J 95/queue length 0.01 0.18 L Control Delay (s/veh) 9-3 I 220�.8 LOS A � -- Approach Delay (s/veh) - 22.8 Approach LOS ry opyrighl®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 l__ :ency/Co. Nelson &Pope L11 Jurisdiction ate Performed 11/1/2007 f Analysis Year 2009 ialysis Time Penod No Build AM Peak Hr Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Depot Ln (No Build) j s t Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Depot Lane er ion Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 025 htcJe Uo anA j`t srtmefl �� O� � ` N ljor Street Eastbound Westbound J wement 1 2 3 4 5 6 J L T R L T R I glume (veh/h) 61 413 �. 551 52 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0:82 0.82 0.82 0.82 surly Flow Rate, HFR 74 I 503 0 0 I 671 I 63 �h/h) trcent Heavy Vehicles 2 - - 0 =_dian Type Undivided f Channelized 0 0 J nes 1 1 0 0 mfiguration L T TR )stream Signal I 0 0 inor Street Northbound Southbound J ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R )lume (veh/h) 39 70 =ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 _J 3L-,1y Flow Rate, HFR 00 I 0 47 0 I 85 -- - - - - - s Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 �— 2 arcennt Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach N N J Storage 0 0 T Channelized 1 0 0 3nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration. LR Wanile el ofd._,_dee s _ _ _ pproach Eastbound Westbound Nbrthbound Southbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration I L I I I I LR (veh/h) 74 132 (m) (veh/h) 871 261 'c 0.08 I 0.51 5% queue length 0.28 2.64 ontrol Delay-(s/veh) 9.5 32.1 OS A D �J ,pproach Delay (s/veh) - 32.1 .pproach LOS - - D -fight©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved 'ICS+TM Version 521 Generated: 111512007 4:45 PN & Pope ope 4gencylCo. Jurisdiction late Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 qi fiysis.Time Period- N�.Build PM Peak Hr' ' a�t/West Street' IY�ain Road (N� 25j`� 1{V`otih/Sdutl�S�e�t D`ebdCiane^ - - ntersection Orientation East West IStudy Pengd (hrs). 0.25 Wz , MajoTStreet � I' Eastbound ``.�`"' . `""' WeStbonnd` `JlovemenT 1 2 3 4 5 6, L T R t,... .� � � �•--n-=�- �ti� �.. �,Q$,6'""".�'� ORB §z#A �.� 0�'� "Yr �a'r��:�` r alOmwat - e r. .d ..�-_r• r '�f�7VlU6d a 1 I 1 l o antis -onfiguration I L T I I I TR !Upstream Siqnal 1 0 1 1 1 0 `Minor Street Northbound Southbound -1/lovement 7 8 9 10 11 L T R L T R R ^'Volume (veh/h) 53 51 ,.beak-Hour Factor, PHF 1 0.86 0.86 0-86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 61 0 59 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 P Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ .-Configuration LR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 1 9 1.0 11 Z Lane Configuration L LR 120 v (veh/h) 41 175_L_ C (m) (veh/h) 821 � v/c 0.05 I 0.61 _95% queue length 0.16 4.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 61.4 J-_LOS A F Approach Delay (s/veh) - 61.4 Approach LOS - - F -opyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved NOS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: '11152007 L_ �: ency/Co. Nelson & Pope Ln Jurisdiction to Performed 11/1/2007 alvsis Time Period No Build Sat Peak Hr I Analysis Year 2009 Description ivlain Rd (NYS 25) at De of Ln (No Build) > ' -t Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Depot Lane .r ion Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 { jor Street I Eastbound { Westbound vement 1 2 3 4 5 ¢6 L T R L T R R !ume (vehlh) 52 633 { 685 { 56 R ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 ( 0.96 0.96 urly Flow Rate, HFR 54 659 0 0 I 713 58 :h/h) scent Heavy Vehicles 2 – _ – 0 :dian Type Undivided _R Channelized 0 p -ies i 1 0 0 1 0 nfiguration L T TR stream Signal 0 { 0 —_R nor Street Northbound Southbound ;vement 7 8 9 10 11 i2 L T R L T R /ume (veh/h) 63 98 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 j ),---IV Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 65 0 102 r Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 :rcent Grade (%) 0 0 3red Approach N N J Storage 0 0 J r Channelized 0 0 J- nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 R 3nfigurabon - LR ja: Queue,: en arJ,Vie, ego#Se7vee proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound l :)vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 me Configuration L LR 'veh/h) 54 167 (m) (veh/h) I 844 I I I I I I 217 RR c 0.06 0.77 >% queue length 0.20 5.38 T��J cntrol Delay (s/veh) 9.6 61.6 �I 9S A F I Dproach Delay (s/veh) 61.6 J ?proach LOS Rr^aht©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 4:46 PM ,l. gency/Co. Nelson &Pope Tate Performed 11/1/2007 _ Jurisdiction No Build AM Peak Hr ,-=:- , Analysis Year 2b09 h11 al sis T rna Penod (Ad1us d) •r� - ra eC Decnptor Sc�og7ldouse Y a riot Cane (No 13uV M�k� j s ed) w ast/WestStreet SchoolHouseR d �t•Jo-htSou SYreef:`DepofLai�e rteisect�n OreMatLon' No{th South $iudy Penod (hrs) 0,25 e eae a xs sE Aa Street Northbound 3 i 4" Sout MOM 0 0 1 0 _onfiguration LT0 TR Upstream Si -nal 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L 7 R Volume veh/h 23 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHP 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 t�outlyflow Rate,HFR 31 0 16 0 0 0" veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 �) Percent Grade (%) 0 0 __* glared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR a,. Qu ev. und Southbound Westbound Eastbound Approach Northbo Movement 1 4 7 r Lane Configuration LT LR t v (veh/h) 6 47 �— C (m) (veh/h) 1379 733 _ f .V/C 0.00 0.06 L 95% queue length 0.01 0.21_ Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 10.2 LOS A � - Approach Delay (s/veh) - - 10.2 B j Approach LOS L Copyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+T°^ Version 521 Generated: '1115/2007 nvua ency/Co. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction .te Performed 11/i/2007 alysis Time Period No Build PM Peak Hr Analysis Year 2009 Description - Schcol House Rd at Depot Lane (No 'Build) J ;test Street School House Road North/South Street: Depot Lane J y lon Orientation- North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 { h�cleVo�Fire�es,an��e��►as�rr}ents ,�' ��� '���r �-x��3_w_� -,�� � jor Street Northbound { Southbound —J vement { 1 { 2_ 3 { 4 { 5 { 6 L T { R { L T { R -J fume (veh/h) { 2 { 82 { { 89 ak-Hour Factor, PHF { 0.73 0.73 0.73 { 0.73 0.73 { 0.73 I urly Flow Rate, HFR J :h/h} 2 112 0 0 I 121 15 r cent Heavy Vehicles 2 { – – 0 :dian Type Undivided J- Channelized I I 0 I I 0 J nes 0 1 0 0 ( 1 0 1 nfiguration LT istl Signal { 0 { { 0 { nor Street { Eastbound { Westbound 7vement 7 8 9 16 11 12_�` L T R L T R J rlume (veh/h) 26 10 :ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 -Iy Flow Rate, HFR 35 0 I 13 0 I 0 I p Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 { 0 0 Grade 0 0 —� ared ed Approach . N N Storage 0 0 F Channelized 0 3nes 0 0 0 0 { 0 p �nfiguration LR eue 't_ an leve aproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 T12 ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 2 48 J (m) (veh/h) 1448 784 C 0.00 I I 0.06 � J 5% queue length a00 0.20 ontrol Delay (s/veh) I 7.5 9.9 OS A A �J pproach Delay (s/veh) – – 9.9 pproach LOS I – I – A �� Wight O 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 1115/2007- 4:47 PM °agency/Co. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction Date Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 �WalyslsTime Period Np Build Sat Peak Hr 3zro f-Dec tion_ S`choof LausRr at De opt Lane (Nb 8mld) z a �N' MSouth�Stree-t De of Lane EastNVestStreet School`Nouse O P Stud Penod (firs 6.. 5 i'ntersectlotl Oijentatlon, , Nor01 South. - ' � _ t . - � --�. ,• ,- . ' W-orrStreet " No hbound '`Soutii6ound `MWement Z 3 4 g g rg p e#! _ � r�r eItzed 0 � s =ares' 0. - -�onfiguration LT TR U stream Si nal 0 0 _•VIIr1of Street Eastbound Westbound lMovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R FWolume veh/h) 30 19 - rpeak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0-80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 0 23 0 0 0-� eh/h percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 'fared Approach N N U. Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 L+ anes 0 0 0 0 0 onfigurabon LR Iiiii" 1,15,111; 1 Pei —Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound f4pproach ^ 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 Movement = ane Configuration LT LR W (veh/h) 4 60 C (m) (veh/h) 1358 730 w/c I 0.00 0.08 _ 35% queue length 0.01 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 10 4�— (r LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) - 10'4 Approach LOS _ B s,opyright O 2005 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 l lency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction ate Performed 1111/2007 �Analysis Year 2009 i.alysis Time Period No Build PM Peak Hour Description Middle Road (CR 48) at Depot` Lane (No Build) s+ st Street: Middle Road (CR 48) North/South Street: De of Lane J W. ion Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 3or Street Eastbound Westbound Dvement 1 2 3 4 5 1- 6 L T R L T R )lume (veh/h) 19 686 40 39 722 2 yak-Hour Factor, PHF ( 0.97 I 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 I� 0.97._ burly Flow Rate, HFR 2 19 707 41 I 40 744 1 eh/h) III :reent Heavy Vehicles 2 edian Type Raised curb _J T Channelized 1 I I 1 J rues 1 2 1 1 2 unfiguration L_ T R L T R ostresm Signal 0 0 J inor Street Northbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R glume (veh/h 56 14 50 2 6 14 oak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 t- ly Flow Rate, HFR 57 14 51 2 6 14 1 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 !..,It Grade (%) 0 0 fared Approach I N N J{ Storage 0 0 T Channelized 1 I 1 anes 0 1 1 0 1 1 onfiguration .. LT R LT R .ela: r ewe .tee; t_. nevei�o#,;e�v _s pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound tovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration I L I L I LT I I R I LT I R (veh/h) I 19 I 40 71 I I 51 8 14 (m) (veh/h) I 859 I 887 I 241 I I 642 I 217 I 625 Ic I 0.02 I 0.05 I 0.29 I I 0.08 I 0.04 I 0.02 W. queue length 0.07 0.14 1.19 0.26 0.11 0.07 ;ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.3 9.3 26.1 11.1 22.2 10.9 .OS A A D B C B ,pproach Delay (s/veh) - 19.8 15.0 J approach LOS I - I I C I C -fight©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+T"` Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 4:48 PM &Pope ope agency/Co. Jurisdiction I )ate Performed 11/1/2007 Arial, 1 l Year 2009 ariafysis Tlrrie t?eriod XG-Bifill Sat Peak Hour, if0 a fl2S�fAplAL1 � Iv.f�48 Se Ot llJ astANes#Street Middleoad(& S) � / outltrelt DoLar3e in pr ecUon�OLlentaUorl East best �Sttidy Penod (firs) 0.25 slill 011igall 11 1! Will ; nZ Ji i;l A16 of Siteet Eastbound Jlovemen . 1 2 3 4 5 B , RL T R rb x . .VSs., - '' TM's a �:'-�- `^ 1� Id Se(7 Cf% ^�'" "t _" T t 'a`. 'E s'',R,4`E •''"` Pa. Lanese` p I n 2 1 I 1 2 I 1 nfiguration t i L i R i L i T� .R_. 0 IV FI.7lICams �� - Northbound Southbound Minor Street 10 1112 --Movement 7 8 9 R R L T R L T Volume veh/h) 1 33 26 [:67 8 15 11 _Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 I36urly Flow Rate:, HFR I 35 I 28 I 72 I 8 16 � 11 veh/h) 2 2 2 � z 1 'Percent Hea Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 r RT Channelized 1 1 I Lanes 0 1_ 1 0 1 1 Configuration LT R LT R 01 IN � Will e a >a ,h : Orel re (_-,Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 11Movement 1 4 7 8 g 10 11 1 Lane Configuration L I L I LT I R 4 24 v (veh/h) 34 93 63 72 2 i C (m) (veh/h) 906 948 214 ( i 681 1- 192 I 6E VIC 0.04 0.10 0.29 0.11 0.13 0.( r95%queue length 0.12 0.33 1.18 0.35 0.'42 0.1 Control Delay (slveh) 9.1 9.2 28.7 10.9 26 :±1 LOS A A D B D [ Approach Delay (slveh) — — 19'2 21A ,Approach LOS - C C L Copyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 L Build Condition Agency or Co. Nelson & Pope ""' " ' Ln Date Performed 11105107 Area Type All other areas Time Period Build AM Peak Hr (Mitigated) Jurisdiction 00026 Analysis Year 2009 f �Lam,• . t T_ Grade= 0 Sf>;n,North Auav - T t 1 r = R -(- i T R Grade= 0 = LT i ��- i `tel = LR Grade- LTR iI0 Ll eandTimin"fin LS s.3 K�.�WI .w' a' t'as', ;- ;s EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT THRT LT TH RT Itume (vph) 61 418 555 54 42 70 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 1 0.82 0.82 Actuated (P/A) A P I P P A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 Lane Width 10.0 11.0 12.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N I N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 EB Only EW Perm 63 04 SB Only 06 07 o8 G= tng 6.0 G = 52.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 17.0 G = G = , G = 1� Y= 5 IY= 5 IY= 0 ty = 0 IY= 5 IY= IY= Y- uuration of Analysis (hrs) 0.25 Cycle Length C= 90.0 a - W^ r s Gene fin a ton 1 ' Fero e t D�eFt { �Miir"R (f�lS S" 1 i = 8iii ✓7MeehlF Nlittup 1 11!11 yae Ell III • _ LT ETH RT LT TH RT LT T �� H RT LT TH Volume 61 418 555 54 42 7' PHF 082 082 08� 082 082 ' YdeF�lajF.+Ftate - s g1 REM _: - ... - 4 510 e Adjusted Flow Rate 7 Proportion of LT or RT 1 000 0.000 0 089 @ �c.M' F xzYA �Ilp ,.. j�" Y Saturation FlowtRateyg-I w 1900 ,soo 19001900� Base Satflow Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 0.933 10.967 1.000 1.067 fW 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 I 1 fg � ff 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 =1 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.aoo fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa fLu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 _ - J 0.950 1.000 1.000 0.982 fLT 0.260 0.260 _ I- Secondary fLT 1.000 0.988 _ t- f 6 fRT - - 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 fLpb __ 1.000 1.000 1.000 Rpb 1652 1801 1840 1786 j Adjusted Satflow - Jl Secondary Adjusted Satflow 452 468 _J alyst OSB intersection Site Dwy at School House Rd 3ency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction 00026 ate Performed 11/05/07 Analysis Year 2009 r ,is Time Period Build Sat Peak Hour i�- Description Site Driveway at School House Road(Build Sat Peak Hour) Action Street: School House Road North/South Street: Site Driveway Action Orientation: East-West lStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 MI M_olumes 3jor Street Eastbound Westbound 3vement 1 2 34 5 6 L T R L T R rlume (vehlh) 11 46 32 19 :ak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 /urly Flow Rate, HFR 11 46 0 0 32 lg 3hlh). scent Heavy Vehicles 2 — — 0 Aian Type Undivided J Channelized 0 0 nes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ;nfiguration LT- _ TR )stream Signal 0 0 J: 'nor Street Northbound Southbound J :)vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 J L T R I L T R ;lume (veh/h) 16 10 3�a_k-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 / Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 16 0 10 Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 �rcent Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 _ 0 3nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration LR el Que, a en ;_�,,an �e o#�Selrvlce pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 11 26 (m) (veh/h) 1555 933 b 0.01 0.03 �J 5% queue length 0.02 0.09 ontrol Delay (s/veh) 7.3 9.0 OS A A pproach Delay (s/veh) — — 9,0 pproach LOS — A I (` ht(D 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 1119/2007-9:49 AM nalyst d OSB Intersection Jlte ewvy er JwrV�. gencylCo Nelson & Pope Junsdictioh 00026 or -ed 11105707 fAnalysis Year x:009 alysls{Tir�te Period Build OU Peak Hour • H ro ct Qe'scri tion Site Dnvev✓ay at School House Rbar1(8ri]Id lfv}Fealr Hbur� ast/West Street: School Nouse Road �tioithlSoutli Street Site Driveway ' —� I terse-ction Orientation: . East Westu� Period(his : 0.25 e o►umes . u Mme Ma or.Street East�our d WestGofirid 1 2 3 4 ovement� 5 6 ..... c.., ..La. •. . .���..... . " _a gw e - 3Haky�llcfes g _l`�Channehzed�� ..: 0 0 an es 0 1 — 'onfiguration LT TR pstream Signal 0 0 mor Street Northbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h 7 _4 eak-Hour Factor,PHF, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 7 0 4 veh/h 0 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N Storage 0 0 T 0 0 Channelized a 0 0 0 0 0 0 nes LR onfiguration 4pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 Lane Configuration LT LR_ (veh/h) 3 11 C (m) (veh/h) 1599 989 v/c 0-00 0.0'1 5% queue length 0.01 0.03 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 A �_ A - LOS 8.7 pproach Delay(s/veh) A Approach LOS - opyrighl©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 111912007 i alyst OSB Intersection Site Dwy at School House Rd !ency/Co. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction 00026 Ae Performed 11/05107 Analysis Year 2009 sis Time Period Build AM Peak Hour A Description Site Driveway at School House Road (Build AM Peak Hour) WStreet: School House Road North/South Street: Site Driveway . 3rlWion Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 �iicle to tunes artd ?Adj'usrme�`- N-<'0'2 N-A ijor.Street Eastbound Westbound ,vement 1 2 3 . 4 5 6_� L T R L T R ' lume (veh/h). 6 33 37 11 ak-Hour Factor, PHF _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,urly)Flow Rate, HFR 6 33 0 0 37 11 h/h rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 — 0 �dian Type Undivided Channelized I I 0 I I 0 J nes 0 1 0 0 1 0 J )nfiguration LT TR ,stream Signal 0 0 nor Street Northbound Southbound )vement 7 8 9 10 11 _12 L I T R L T R ,lume (veh/h) 13 8 :ak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - y Flow Rate, HFR D 0 0 13 0 Heavy Vehicles 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 :scent Grade (%) 0 0 J ared Approach N aLR Storage 0 T Channelized 0 0 rues 0 0 0 0 0 Dnfiguration ela' •'' en en: kla �. a o. Serv= - sproach Eastbound Westbound- Northbound - Southbound overnent 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 6 21 (m) (veh/h) 1559 952 c I 0.00 I 0.02 i% queue length 0.01 0.07 ontrol Delay (s/veh) 7.3 8.9 DS A A pproach Delay (s/veh) — — 8.9 J pproach LOS — — A ]ht 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/9/2007 9:45 AM i nal st MCM Intersection Lane V v Y gencyJCo., Ne{son & Pope lurisdlction - r { Date Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 nafys%s Ttme'f�engd' Bui{d"SaWeak Hour -, � rolect Description Middle Road(CR 48) at Depot Last/West Street Middle Road (CR 48) f North/South Street Depot Lane erseCtton Orieniatlor� aSt West., Stud Peitpd,=hrs), _0 25_ , tce use to us a or.Street Eastbound Westbound (3 4 5 6 en d£ 7-, F3R r E4, r � ' 3„=�..-� -�• f $e .r m - �` v k a3a �=. SSM;�i`v...wza .;- as§^ arc �HeautrVehlcfes 2 x Raiser7`cufb" edian Type ^_ 1 - RT Cfiannelized' 1' anes 1 2 1 1 2 1 _-„onfiguradon L T R L T 1_ R U stream Si nal 0 0 !nor Street Northbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R glume veh/h 38 26 72 8 15 _11_ eak-Hour Factor, PRF 0.92 0:92 0.92 0.92 0:92- �0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 28 78 8 16 i l veh/h ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 tared Approach N N0 Storage 0 — ` RT Channelized 1 — Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 1 onfiguration LT R LT R e a e _ rr Le el a - pproach` _ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 ane Configuration L L LT R LT (veh/h) 34 98 69 78 24 C (m) (veh/h) 906 948 212 661 189 6 lc 0.04 0.10 0.33 0.11 0.13 —L 0. 5% queue length 0.12 0.34 1.35 0.39 0.43 L0, Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 9.2 30.0 11.0 26.8 1 - OS A A D 8 D �— Approach Delay (s)veh) 19.9 21'7 pproach LOS C C opynght 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+7m Version 521 Generated: 11/5/200? }alyst MCM Intersection Middle Rd (CR 48) Depot I gency/Co. Nelson & Pope Lane .Jurisdiction a'te Performed 1111/2007 Analysis Year 2009 ,is Time Period Build PM Peak Hour o-��' escription Middle Road(CR 48) at Depot Lane (Build) ISMWst Street: Middle Road (CR 48) North/South Street: Depot Lane J ersectlon Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 hic`le�Volum �andA"dlustrr,G��W � � � ,�` alor Street Eastbound Westbound :)vement 1 2 3 4 5 ;fume (veh/h) - 19 686 I 42 R 40 722 J :ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0:97 )urly Flow Rate, HFR I 4 =h/h 3 707 3 41 744 2' I �rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 - - 2 - adian Type Raised curb f Channelized 1 1 :nes 1 2 1 1 2 J Dnfiguration L T R L T R J ostream Signal 0 0 J inor Street Northbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 _12 � L T R L T R )lume (veh/h 58 14 52 2 6 14 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Flow Rate, HFR 59 14 53 I 2 I 6 I 14 arc t Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ercent Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 1 I I I 1 3nes 0 1 1 0 1 � onfiguration LT R LT R eta,_ e e n t_h, _ �evei o eTitildimmigiIIIIIce pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration L L LT R LT R (veh/h) 19 41 73 53 8 14 (m) (veh/h) 859 887 :t:2:41 642 217 625 'G I 0.02 I 0.05 I 0.30 I I 0.08 I 0.04 0.02 5% queue length 0.07 0.15 1.23 0.27 0.11 0.07 :ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.3 9.3 26.3 11.1 22-2 10-9 OS A A D B C I 8 .pproach Delay (s/veh) 19.9 15.0 r-oach LOS I - - I C I C J >r�O 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 5:06 PM alyst MCM Intersection Lane epcy(Co Nelson &Pope Jud dictlo Date Performed 1 i/1/2007 Analysis Year 209 *� BUtldtlMPeakHour n�y"srsTime P'etlod ` ' ro ect Descri tion Middle Road (GR 48) at Depot Lane (Build):- - — East/West Street: Middle Road CR,48) - North/South Street: Depot.Lene. tersectlon Orientation: .East 1i/est. Stud Period(hrs): 0.25 et�t e o ones a , d ew a oStreet Eastbound Westbound VHF _ „ ¢f13 ' ` A i. ... s - war T H �Lehlcles - 2 _ _7 -- . e,18M L P, - - t Remised tiro - RT Channelized I 1 - ` ahes 1 2 — onfiguration L T R L T _R U stream Si nal 0 inor Street Northbound Southbound ___- ovement R 8 9 10 11 _ L T R L T R r olume vehlh) 49 33 90 1 17 14 66k-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 55 37 101 1 19 �S veh/h 2 2 2 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 N -- lared Approach N -- Storage 0 0 ____ 1 RT Channelized 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 _ anes R onfiguration LT R LT pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 11 10 L_ ane Configuration L L LT R L.T L_ ti (vehlh) 13 78 92 101 20 L C (m) (veh/h) 828 847 200 618 177 /c 0.02 _ 0.09 I 0.46 0.16 0.11 1_0 5% queue length 0-05 0.30 2.20 0.58 0.36 _� a Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 9.7 37-5 12.0 2,7..9 OS A A " 24-1 Approach Delay (s/veh) — 20.7C pproach L I C opy Generated: 11/5/ rig ht®200.5 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 — 1 J S lalyst MCM Intersection School House Rd at DepotLane gency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction ate Performed111112007 /'- Analysis Year 2009 Build ;is Time Period Build Sat Peak Hr o-A escription School House Rd at Depot Lane (Build) ist4llMest Street: School House Road North/South Street: Depot Lane _ersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 025 J Fuc�e��/olum�e's ar�d A'�cijustrra���e a#s ���- � _ ajar Street I Northbound I Southbound wement 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R J flume (veh/h) 1 8 97 139 43 :ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 urFR 0.80 bly Flow Rate, Hg. 121 0 0 173 533 eh/h) �rcentHeavy.Vehicles 2 0 edian Type Undivided I Channelized I 0 I I 0 apes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LT TR pstream Signal 0 0 inor Street Eastbound Westbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R plume (veh/h) 40 22 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 low Rate, HFR 49 0 27 0 0 0 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 p ercent Grade (%) 0 0 fared Approach N N Storage 0 0 JI T Channelized 0 anes 0 0 0 0 0 0 .onfiguration LR I1 L,ay Queu__yLen .pproach ~ Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration L7 LR (veh/h) 9 76 (m) (veh/h) 1342 709 lc 0.01 0.11 5% queue length 0.02 0.36 ;ontrol Delay (s/veh) T 7 10.7 . OS A B approach Delay (s/veh) — — 10.7 oath LOS - B 1� ©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved NCS+TM Version 521 Generated- 11/5/2007 5:05 PM Intersection Hous �nalyst MCM Hous gencylCo Nelson & Pope 1irisdigtion- >: Date-M-0rmed ' �1/1/Z00 Analysts Year 2009 a } xa s Tied`Period eurid°PN1 Peak Nr it,7o ect Desc:0 tion School House Rd at Depof Lane (Build) j East/West Street: School House Road- [Jorth/South Street: Ds of Lane_ Stud Period hrs : 025 tersEettott,mentation: North-South ( e d�`1tstme a"orS£reet Northbourid S`ou3�i ound tt k FT FSC 'aw��; •. '..+' ... ''�" ;Wd,x.a.. u...^'�•, �2 -r -w-irx'� Wit_ --n• • y3 s..'�F Sr S �ra'c T 2 �.,,.<...y..'�-.w^v.•. yd-+.f+.'> 3yw�'`. .t�, 'ma 9�.�u ee� ea. Y Uel€es a " � n RT Channelized , 0. f apes 0 1 0 0 1 0 _ TR onfiguration LT 0 0 Upstream Si nal Eastbound Westbound !nor Street ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R f. olume veh/h 30 12 eak=lJou`rFactor, PHF 0.73 0.73 0:73 0.73 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 16 0 �� veh/h 0 0 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 -fared Approach N — Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 anes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfigurabon LR pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11= ane Configuration LT LR�_ (veh/h) 5 57 C (m) (veh/h) 1443 77E /c 0.00 0.0,7 21 .5 1 00 5%, queue length 7 0 _Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 . IDS A ` Approach Delay (s/veh) 10.0 A pproach LOS opyright O 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS-TM Version 5.21 Generated: 1115/200_7 nalyst MCM j tersec=tion School House Rd at Depot Zane gency/Co. Nelson & Pope urisdiction ate Performed 11/1/2007 i T n n Peak u nalysis Year 2003 i, si5 Time Period Build A"I r can r �r M.Descfiption School House Rd at Depot Lane (Build) 3s est Street: School House Road North/South Street: Depot Lane tersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 eii�cle�%oiuii�esan_tl_ Ad ust nts �gMt ' � ajor Street �~ Northbound Southbound ovement 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 J I L T R L I T R 3lume (veh/h) 7 96 I 111 1 41 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 J ourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 129 0 0 149 55 eh/h) ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- — 0 -- — edian Type Undivided J T Channelized I I 0 0 3nes 0 1 0 1 0 I 1 0 J onfiguration LT I I TR pstream Signal 0 ' _ 0 linor Street Eastbound Westbound 'ovement 7 8 _ 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Blume (veh/h) ( 34 15 ` Hour Factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 20 0 0 0 I ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 'ercent Grade (%) 0 0 laved Approach N N Storage 0 0 iT Channelized 0 0 anes 0 0 0 0 0 0 J ;onfiguration LR eve oT ervre_ E ANO approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound /iovement I 1 I 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 9 61 1 (m) (veh/h) 1368 722 Ic 0.01 0.08 i5% queue length 0.02 0.28 ,ontrol Delay (s/veh) 7.6 10.4 -OS A B approach Delay (s/veh) — 10.4 roach LOS — B t©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 5:05 M ut MGM Intersection nalyst Ln 9,?ngY, Co Nelson &Pope , J6pis_diction Date Performed . 11✓1l200� s y ..nalysts Year 2009 Budd-SaYPeak Hr. s a�ys> T rlie!'enbd ro ect Descri tion Main Rd(NYS 25) at Depot Ln (Build) EasUWest Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Depot Lane. me ce i©q,Or)enta _qn:, East West_ — 1Spudy Period(Firs): 0.25 0 d e Westbound a&,Street Eastbound .. - _ is•,; USSa r. - J w Mt YIm-mac-ru. "� K P v eeelieaehllzle x Aw wu ti 0 RT Channelized 0 0.. — Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 :v Configuration L T TR t eam Si nal 0 0 r Street Northbound Southboundment 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R _ r Volume (veh/h _ 66 98 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0:96 0A6 0.96 �0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 68 0 '0 4 (veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Uel e_ Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11= Lane Configuration L LR� v (veh/h) 54 170 C (m) (veh/h) 835 211 v/c 0.06 0.81 950%queue length 0.21 5.8 2 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 68.:3 LOS IA 68.3 F Approach Delay (s/veh) — Approach LOS — F HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 111512007 — Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved nalyst MGM Intersecron Main Rd (NYS 25) at Depot gency/Co. Nelson & Pope Ln ate Performed 11/1/2007 Jurisdiction r,__ rZ__:_ Analysis Year 2009 Is I nmi r-cuvd No Budd FM Peak Hr Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Depot Ln (Build) astMest Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Depot Lane tersection.Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 W-PMO Valu<t es an_ A�jus�ten'e its � �s ajor Street �^ Eastbound Westbound ovement 1 2 3 4 5 3 J L T R L T I R 3lume (veh/h) 36 632 1 639 57 =_ak-Hour Factor PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 1 0.86 0.86 0.86 curly Flow Rate, HFR 41 734 0 0 743 66 eh/h) =_rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 — — 1 0 _ edian Type Undivided F Channelized I I 0 I p anes 1 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration L T ( TR pstream Signal 0 0 iinor Street Northbound Southbound 'ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T T R J olume (veh/h) ( 55 51 Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 1 0.86 1 0.86 0.86 J e� low Rate, HFR 0 0 0 I 63 0 59 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 � ercent Grade (%) 0 0 J lared Approach N N Storage 0 D :T Channelized 0 p anes 0 0 0 0 0 0 - :onfig u ration LR ca- r ,pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration I L I I I I LR (veh/h) 41 I ' I I 122 /o) (veh/h) 172 i 005 I I I I 0.71 5°G queue length 0.16 4.33 ;ontrol Delay (s/veh) 9.6 65.2 OS A F kpproach Delay (s/veh) — — 652 ach LOS - — F s ©2005 University o FFlorida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TrA Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 5:04 Pi, nalyst MCM Intersection Ln V gecylCg, Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction Date Pe ormed 11/7/2007 A-nalysis Year 2009 Bd'ttd`AM"f?eak'I-In . .s ..,..,. ,,-� nalsts Tlme enol ro'ect Descriptio Main Rd NYS 25) at De of Ln (Build) IJorthlSouth Street De o(Lane;, EastWgstStreet Main Road(NYS 25). Stud Period (his : 0.25 ectlon drientato ,': East-West stbound e< oyf rr d e a or Street Easf6oUnd 1Ne .,ika 02 i c }heavy hlcles dffided" - , RT Ct annelized anes 0 1 � 0 1 1 �-00 — L T TR onfiguration 0 � I 0 U stream Signal Southbound !nor Street Northbound 7 S 9 10 ovement 11 12 — L T R L T R 42 70 olume veh/h eak-F(our Factor, PHF 0.82 0:82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 p 0 51 0 85 veh/h 2 p ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) N — lared Approach N — Storage 0 0 0 0 RT Channelized 0 p 0 0 0 0 anes LR onfiguration e a, eneIIIIE 111-D-0w Ie pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11= ane Configuration L LR—L— (vehlh) 74 136_ C (m) (veh/h) 866 252', Ic 0.09 0.54 95% queue length 0.28 34 1 Control Delay (slveh) 9.5 34.9 LOS A D� — Approach Delay (s/veh) 34.9 D pproach LOS HCS+TM Version 527 Generated: 71/5/2007 opyright®2005 University o1 Florida,All Rights Reserved • J Main Rd(NYS 25) at North nalyst MCM Intersection Rd gency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction ate Performed 11/1/07 Analysis Year 2009 sis 1 irne Period Build Sat Peak nr c escription Main Rd (NYS 25) at NorthSt(Build) j as est Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: North Street _J tetsection Orientation: East-West jStudy Period (hrs):. 0.25 j ajor Street I Eastbound I Westbound o_vement 1 j 2 j 3 ( 4 j 5 j L j T R j L j T j R )lume(veh/h) 4 j 661 j j j 705 } 5 _J eak-Hour Factor, PHF j 0.90 0.90 0.90 j 0.90 j 0.90 j 0.90 j ourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 734 I 0 0 783 5 eh/h} ercent Heavy Vehicles j 2 j 0 j — j edian Type Undivided T Channelized I _ 0 I I 0 anes 1 j i j 0 j 0 1 j 0 onfiguration L T j ( j TR j pstream Signal j 0 ( j 0 Iinor Street Northbound Southbound lcvement - j 7 j 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R J olume (veh/h) 8 7 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 J ' low Rate, HFR 0 0 0 8 0 7 / JJ 'ercent Heavy Vehicles j 0 j 0 0 2 0 2 'ercent Grade (%) 1 0 0 lared Approach N N Storage I 0 I 0 J :T Channelized 0 p J anes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;onfiguration ILR eJayJ neue Lin h T nd line o' Se�rice ,pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Aovement 1 4 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 12 -ane Configuration I L I I I I I LR (veh/h) I 4 I I I I I 15 (m) (veh/h) 1 831 I I I I I I 187 •/c I 0.00 I I I I 0.08 )5% queue length. 0.01 I 0.26 control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 25.9 OS A D approach Delay (s/veh) 25.9 �jkach LOS — D ©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 5:04 Pl� 1 _nalyst MCM IntersecDon lvjcrm, . v - -• gency/Co. ' Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction 11t7ate Peiiormed' 1111120,07 r, Ar alyslsYear 1009 ro ec6escn tlbn` Main Rtl(NY 51 at NorthSt(Build ; . t _astwest Street Main.Road(NYS 23) North/South Street North Stree lnfeis_ection Onentation_,fast=1N_est Stud Period;(hrs.: 0.2�,_ , -Y- - e � V� o esu �, � � - � w�� _. 1 _.: Westbo_und.•, a.. �: < - p�'SYreet��'., oVement 1 2 3 4 - 5 r �' o , .. , .__.: . � _- ,"...... - ,v_-. ..x...x-a--n-. ..EE.-`.. .. a,s['_,..f �t?Y4 ,. Ix�2R�. s ,.S r :M.r•- ,. �,.� l"=Channi3liiecJ; ' _Lanes Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement $ 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 0 Pep-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 r Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 2 0 o_ veh/h Percent Heavy vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 Percent Grade N 0 0 Flared Approach N —�— Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR _ia a t:,arjd�.Mpg] Serv7 Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11= Lane Configuration L ---� LR � v (veh/h) 1 2 C (m)(veh/h) 869 vlc 0.00 0.01 0.0 — 95% queue length 0-00 4 J Control Delay (slveh) A I I LOS Approach Delay (slveh) - 3 D — D Approach LOS - - — opyright©2005 university of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 {I J lalyst MCM Intersection Main Rd(,VYS 25) at North St lency/Co. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction ate Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 – sis Time Period Build AM Peak Hr Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at North St (Build) st Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street North Street _J lion Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 025 .�ck..�<�w7cx�• �-- »� ',�+' gam" �" � ��"�' h�cie�/�oi�7mes�and /atl�usmetsLL: s"or Street EastboundWestbound Dvement 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T I R J Hume{veh/h) 2 514 613 g I . yak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 wrly Flow Rate, HFR 2 642 0 0 766 9 eh1h) J >rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 – J edian Type Undivided F Channelized 0 0 :nes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Dmiguration I LT TR estream Signal 0 0 inor Street Northbound Southbound J ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L I T Dlume (veh/h) 2 1 / _ak-Hour Factor, PHF—_t_0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 ,y Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 2 0 1 Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2J—J arcent Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 J, anes" 0 0 0 0 0 0 J onfiguratiorl LR e a ;Q�asv_e_ e'jhand a vel ofS¢ry e_e pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 2 3 (m) (veh/h) 841 191 IC 0.00 0.02 5% queue length - 0.01 0.05 :ontroi Delay (s/veh) 9.3 24.1 OS A C ,pproach Delay (sNeh) I – I – 24.1 ,pproach LOS I I I I C J ©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+nd Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 5:03 PM \nalyst MCM Intersection -- -- �gencylCo. Nelson &Pope Jurisdiction gatePErformed ��/a12(J07 3 �nalyslsYear 2009 a a ys s7k1e�Period . Btu d,Sat Peek Hr t w a E- gec[Deseri"tion` MairFRoadatGnn-3reet($uljd) ast/West Street Main Road (lYYS 25) 196ith/South Street Griffin Street ntgfseetion Orientatim East-West Stu Period (hrs). 0.25 tele �l e d str:�e ME a oYStreet r -<` -- EastStitind� , '-_ ; .. " 1Nesibound a. - ovement� ..v:.. . _ ad`.:. .: �.• „E-x. p. '. w"Y°YY ✓S-k 4.Sva 1^:L,. C n i .�" . 'c • - `4 : her is^�'a• ,`=s: X T C'hannhzed., 0 . _Lanes. 0 1. -.0 - p. _. ._- .1 :- LT TR onfiguration 0 I 0 pstream Signal — Minor Street Northbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume /veh/h) 67 68 t` eak-Hou�Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 70 0 71 { veh/h ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N -- — Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 i onfiguration L R e a, K ete l }7 a • ell E. pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 Lane Configuration LT / (veh/h) 44 700 (m) (veh/h) 882 159 _ 4 v/c 0.05 0.4�_ 0. 5%queue length 0.16 2.00 0. Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 44.3 — 1 LOS A J pproach Delay (s/veh) — 29'2 — D Approach LOS — — opyright®2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TtA version 5.21 Generated: '11/5/2007 _.1 lalyst MCM Intersection Main Rd (NYS 25) at Griffin St Tency/Co. Nelson 8 Pope Jurisdiction ate Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 '^ sis Time Period Build PM Peak Hr !�akHt ription Main Road ar Griffin Street (Build)treet: Main Rt: Griffin Street Orientation: 0.25 IutrY s aiid9Wit tWestbound 4 5 6 L T =h/h) 32 570 593 49 Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 _�ly Flow Rate, HFR 35 640 0 I 0 666 I 55 �rcent Heavy Vehicles _2 – 0 f _J edian Type Undivided T Channelized I 0 I 0 Ines I 0 1 0 0 1 0 Dnfiguration LT TR ostream Signal 0 0 J inor Street Northbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12. L T R L T R plume (veh/h) 23 37 eak-HourFactor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89J Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 25 0 41 eW Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 ercent Grade (%) 0 0 laved Approach N N Storage 0 0 'T Channelized I 0 — 0 anes 0 0 0 1 0 :onfiguration L R Y1 , Clue Len,th_,£an• euei f e vee ,pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT L R (veh/h) 35 25 41 (m) (veh/h) 881 148 443 /c 0.04 0.17 0.09 15% queue length 0.12 0.59 0.30 :ontrol Delay (s/veh) I 9.3 I 34.2 14.0 _OS A D B \pproach Delay (s/veh) – – I 21.6 \pproach LOS I – I – C l—ht©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 5:02 PN (�nalyst MCM Intersection Main KO by io ZU] ar �rnuu ( gencylCo Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction fate Peimed 11/1!2007 An lyses 1lear 2009 Aialysia� Perloda BOr1dM Peak_ Ir -r ect escnptton ---Main"-tbaa`at'�ntfrn tr h(Bwftl- xs _. ast/West Street Main Road jNYS'25j JNo'rth/South Street Grlffrf Street Intersec#ton Orieatation: „East-_Wes< stud G P.eod.(hrs),. 0.25 a or St[eet Eastbound Westbound oven ent 1 2 3 4 5 6 Z4.1- WON tai x2 1{ridrlidedw -4 t 0 Than-ne7ized` N„ 0 Lanes onfiguration LT TR pstream Signal 0 0 —_ inorStreet f Northbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 R L T R L _ T - Volume (veh/h) _—_l 43 19 _ eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.63 0.63 0.83 0.83 0.83 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 51 0 59 veh/h flared cent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 cent Grade (°i°) �_ 0 --�--0 Approach I N I I °�—.—__ I 0 �_ 0 Storage T Channelized 0 0 - anes onfiguration L R - - pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 S 9 10 11= Lane Configuration LT `--�--�� (veh/h) 74 51 C (m) (veh/h) 890 161 _� 4 Vic 0.08 0.32 0 95% queue length 0.27 1-27 0 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 37C.4 I _� LOS A Approach Delay (slveh) I - l - 1 _ 24.8 Approach LOS I - I I _ C opyright m 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/52007 • -lalyst MCM I Intersection Main Rd (NYS 25) at Highland 3ency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction ate Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 sis Time Period Build Sat Peak Hr y 6 escri tion Main Rd (NYS 25)at Highland Rd (Build) a st Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Highland Road :ersection Orientation: East-West {Study Period (hrs): 0.25 J - a or Street Eastbound Westbound J avement { 1 2 { 3 { 4 { 5 6 { L T { R { L { T { R Dlume (veh/h) 9 633 505 8 =ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 a88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 J burly Flow Rate, HFR 10 719 0 0 573 9 -1 eh/h) 1 -rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 ( { 0 — J edian Type Undivided T Channelized I I 0 ( I I 0 Ines { 0 1 0 0 1 0 { :)nfiguration LT { { { { { TR { ostream Signal { 0 { { 0 { inor Street { Northbound Southbound ovement { 7 8 9 10 11 12 L I T R L I T R plume (veh/h) { 10 4 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 11 0 4 e � Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 J ercent Grade (%) I 0 I 0 fared Approach I N I N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 anes 0 0 0 0 0 p onfiguration LR 'eta ue eE_e E ,ar�rl_gl e el�fA!!i r �_ceEa- OMER pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 10 15 (m) (veh/h) 992 209 lc 0.01 0.07 W. queue length 0.03 _. 0.23 ;ontrol Delay (s/veh) 8.7 23.6 OS A C .pproach Delay (s/veh) I — I I I 23.6 ,pproach LOS I — — I I C - 02085 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 5:01 PM Analyst_ MCM Intersection Main Ka liv Ta LJf �t 4gency/Co. Nelson & Popeurisdlctidn 2009 Da e Ptrfiormed' �i/1f2007 knalysis Year �ysl�TtmePeriod . � �uild4RMPealEklr ; , " � Fr . , ,r,,,._ _ •mar _ ro'ect;De 1511106 Main Rd(NYS 2s)at Highland Rd (Build), asJ/West Street Main Road (NYS 252NOrth/SOuth Street Hi hland'Road ✓� Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ntersectlon Onegtatlon East Ille l " ©GilR12S Ila or-Sfr et Eas£bound Westbound vomer le 1 1 - T R y- .'�'�.'K- UEYOtt e,_,_y,' F cies r _ "a _ Undivided Lanes 0 Configuration LT TR — Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 Movement — L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 6 7 — i peak-Hour factor, PHF.... . -_ . ._0.93 _0,93 - 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 6 0 7 veh/h 0 0 2 _p Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0� Flared Approach N —� Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 LR Configuration Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound I Movement 1 1 4 7 8 9 10 11� Lane Configuration LT LR .e�.�_ ..;.u.•� � .xa:�l�+-Y . <':.n »:-r:. .. ..t.P�.�-0vaie:E _:..'j�ac v�v"�t':Y:�:S �-a..,s1:..f� A'2.-P.=.:"""'S' w'L�usy` -121yst MCM Intersection Main Rd (NYS 25) of Highland gency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction ate Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 ' sis Time Period Build AAA Peak Hr �> escription Main Rd (NYS 25)at Highland Rd (Build) st Street: Main Road (NYS 25) North/South Street: Highland Road ;exsection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (his): 0.25 _J -sR 6765 1"p atiadsAdjustments _ ajor Street I Eastbound Westbound _J ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 _ L T R L I T I R Dlume (veh/h) 8 465 533 11 aak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 surly Flow Rate, HFR g 560 0 0 642 13 eh/h) �rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 edian Type Undivided T Channelized 0 0 J :nes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LT I _ TR ostream Signal 0 L0 inor StreetNorthbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 1 11 12 L I T R I L T R plume (veh/h) 9 7 Zak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 HF Flow Rate, R 0 0 0 10 0 :e 8 e ,,it Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 I 2 0 2 ercent Grade (%) 1 0 0 lared Approach N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 J anes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration LR ela, Qu_ue _ e .qt and e e > Plow ach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 9 18 (m) (veh/h) 932 -- is 0-01 0-07 5% queue length 0.03 0.22 ;ontrol Delay (s/veh) 8.9 OS A C .pproach Delay (slveh) I — I — I I 19.6 ,pproach LOS I — ( I C O 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved NCS+TT Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/2007 5:00 PM nalyst; MCM intersection Land encylGo Nelson &Pope r orisdlrtlon Dade Performed 11/1/200( AralyslsYear 2009 B9+fd Sat Peal4 Hr - x �rral�sls'frtne Period` , ; ,=; ro ect Description Main Rd(NYS 25)at Crown Land Rd (Budd) East/VVgst Street: Main Road(NYS-25) North/South Street. Crown Land Road ' terscto Orher ahon_, EastYi/asf , S .Period;(hrs : .0,25 _ e a s _ e a"or,street Eastbound Westbound b go E � x E f - edLarr_" pe,,. ,(7ndivided RT Channelized'" 0 - an 0 0 1 LT 1 TR — onfigurntion 0 U stream Si nal 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 S 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 2 14 olume(veh/h -- PeFlour Factor, PHF 0.93 0:93 0.93 0.93 0:93 ak- 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 2 0 15 vehlh Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 Percent Grade (%) 1 0 0 '' Flared Approach Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes LR s Configuration Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 1 4 7 S 9 10 11= Lane Configuration LT v (veh/h) 9 17� C (m) (veh/h) 917 37F3 ' v/c 0.01 I 0.04 — 95% queue length 0.03 0.14 — Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 15.�_ LOS A 8�— Approach Delay (s/veh) — — 15.0 — B 7i Approach LOS ]Copyright O 2005 university o1 Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/5/6 )alysf MCM Intersection Main Rd(NYS 25) ai Crowns 3ency/Co. Nelson & Pope Jurisdiction Land ate.Performed 11/1/2007 Analysis Year 2009 { is Tine Period Build PM Peak Hr --� o escri tion Main Rd (NYS 25) at Crown Land Rd (Build) s est Street Main Road (NYS 25) INorth/South Street: Crown, Land Road ersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 =htcle��/olurnes_�and_.Ad7��_ter�ents � WON MW ajor Street f Eastbound Westbound 7vement I 1 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 g R L Ilume (veh/h) I 13 585 I I I 614 4 yak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 )urly Flow Rate, HFR 13 6090 0 I 639 =_h/h �rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 — — 0 L edian Type I Undivided C Channelized I 0 I p Ines 0 I 1 I 0 0o I 1 4 I )nfiguration LT I I I I TR 3stream Signal I I 0 I I 0 4 inor Street Northbound Southbound J ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R glume veh/h) 2 1� HourFactor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 096 7 low Rate, HFR 0 0 0 2 0 11 A �rcent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 =rcent Grade (%) 0 0 ared Approach N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 3nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration LR ela ; ^ueue��e� th n_ =eve,' f�Se�iee _ pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT LR �J (veh/h) I 13 I I 13 (m) (veh/h) I 942 I I I I I 380 'c 0.01 0.03 J 5% queue length 0.04 0.11 __ J ontrol Delay (s/veh) 8.9 14.8 �J OS A g pproach Delay (s/veh) — 14.8 ach LOS — g �p 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11152007 4:59 PM lYlalurw lsv + v �� ._. . -Analyst MCM Intersection Land Junsdlctlonge c /Co Nelson 8Pope Efate P,er(ormed1 /1f2007 ' ghatysls Year 2009 algsis Tlrtle Period jjuild�lM Peale Hr y �� n ro'ect Description Main Rd(N S'26) at Crown Land Rd(Bulldj East/West Street Main Road ffUYS-25) �Ndith/South Street: Crown Land Road„ _. tedsection Orientation: East-West $_Cud Period hrs - 0.25 a or=Sheet East6o`un.d r Wes#bound u a <$ _ � �a a. Vk( eayyhleL�s 2 * 3 - -. • � -- - � LJ'n'di�Tde7"":..�.e-�,�-ate.-. ,.�.Y.,.�.- .: e tan Pe RT Cha_nhehzed 0 anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 LT TR onfiguration I I r ' stream al 0 L r Siv Street Northbound Southbound Move t ove ment 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R I olume veh/h) 4 10 _ _ ea' Hour Factor, P40.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0:81 0.8 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 4 0 12 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 00 �� Flared Approach N N — �— — Storage 0 0 L RT CHannelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration lip 4- LR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 ill Lane Configuration LT L—,�I (veh/h) 4 �1 C (m) (veh/h) 901 03.265 �_ v/c 0.0 95% queue length 0.011 0.15 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 16.6 ,_ LOS A —� � Approach Delay (s/veh) - 16.6 Approach LOS _ C — opyright 02005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 521 Generated: 11/5/2007 Build with Mitigation Condition CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET ' ,, -)ject Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Depot Ln (Budd AM Peak Hr Mitigated) � ._ NEB L WB _ NB I_ SB Lane Group L T I _ TR LR Adjusted Flow Rate 74 510 743 136 Satflow Rate 1652 1801 1840 1786 Lost Time 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.58 019 Lane Group Capacity 396 1261 1063 337 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.40 t 0.70 0.40 Flow Ratio 0.04 0.28 L 0.40 0.08 - Critical Lane Group Y N y y Sum Flow Ratios 0-52 L Lost Time/Cycle 15.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.63 Lrg .xs ,7` �f -="- at��i' -�''�5 ` �:ane Gro Capacty Control Delay ,an SOS Dete'."M�atin n� M EB WB NB SB - Group L T TR LR lusted Flaw Rate 74 510 743 136 Lane Group Capacity 396 1261 1063 337 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.40 0.70 0.40 Green Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.58 0,19 Uniform Delay di 6.3 5.6 13.5 32.0 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 0.2 1.0 3.8 0.8 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 6.6 6.6 17.3 32.8 Lane Group LOS A A B C Approach Delay 6.6 17.3 32.8 Approach LOS A B C Intersection Delay 14.5 Intersection LOS B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 521 Generated: 31/5/2007 3:00 1 �'O Hnaryai ,,,.� Ln Ag Ry or Co Nelson & Pope a,_ Pe(fcird57AreT �e All other areas .�, rhe a lod� ���, ,'�� � �a Is � � T'`�•:r �._ �� �`* F e e� ro os 71 � Grade0 t � I ' Grade= 0 I t SAu�Plarlb fv[cs .... u V x.svyldet ..�:. Yk fi L„ rz Y 4 _ a - JR Y�Grade= 0 +; t��� i t t = LR '� -�—I Grade= 'r = LTR n EB WB NB SB I LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH L� Volume (vph) 36 632 639 54 55 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.86 0.86 0-86 0.86 0-86 Actuated (PIA) A P P P A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 T30 . -7 Arrival Type 3 3 3 J Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3-0 Ped/BikeIRTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 11.0 12.0 14.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N jParking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0_ Pedestrian Timing 3.2 3.2 3'2 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 G = 6.0 G = 52.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 17.0 G = G = Timing Y5 Y = 5 Y = 0 Y = 0 Y = 5 Y = Y = = Duration of Anal sis (hrs = 0.25 1 C cle Lencith C = 90.0 Project Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Depot Ln (Build PN Peak Hr Mitigated) NO 0. fRA rffl-b w_ �.c s$.��. m i� 5_->.;. .s "SC�ss�- � 'mssM, NOW • EB I WB I NB SB LT TH RT LT L TH � R7-I LT I TH I RT LT TH RT Volume 36 632 I 639 54 155 51 I PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Adjusted Flow Rate 42 735 743 63 64 59 Lane Group L T TR { f La I` - Adjusted Flow Rate J 42 735 I 1806 I I 2 Proportion of LT or RT 1.000 0-000 IO 078 I 4 m.Sccs-zrjs 1900 1900 11900 1 -- Base Satflow 1900 " L If rNumber of Lanes 1 i 1 0 0 �I 0 0.933 0.967 1.000 1.067 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 I� if 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 P fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 - f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 a fLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLT 0.950 1.000 1.000 0-975 Secondary fLT 0.238 0.238 1 - - - fRT 1.000 0.989 0.935 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - fLpb fRpb - - - 1. -000 1.000 1.000 - Sdjusted Satflow 1652 1801 1843 1811 ondaryAdjusted Satflow 413 428 k :� , ''� • ,- _ IM � ez�fis�3C���'L—OW7 Ss� r;Fr1' -i'x w zx - �. €s Pay• �. EB \NB NB SB Lane Group L T TR L:R: Adjusted Flow Rate 42 735 806 123.- 1652 1801 1843 1811 Gam.` Flow Ratio 0,03 10.41 l Critical Lane Group Y N Y Y -! 0-53 Sum Flow Ratios Lost Time/Cycle 15.00 Critical VIC Ratio 0.64 EB WB Ng SBR Lane Group L T TR LR Adjusted Flow Rate 42 735 806 1 372 1261 1065 3 Lane Group Capacity VIC Ratio 0.11 0.58 0.76 0.36— Green Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.58 0.19 Uniform Delay d1 6.9 6.8 14.3 31.8 7 Delay Factor k Oil 0.50 0.50 0-11 Incremental Delay d2 0.1 2-0 5.0 _ 0.6 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 6.6 8-8 19.3 32.4 1 Lane Group LOS A A B —L— J Approach Dela11 y 8.7 19.3 32.4 Approach LOS A B C — Intersection Delay 15.4 Intersection LOS B Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved NCS+nO Version 5.21 Generated: 11/5/20 J Agency n Intersection Agcy or Co. Nelson &Pope Ln Date Performed 11/05/07 Area Type All other areas Time Period Build Sat Peak Hr(Mitigated) Jurisdiction 00026 Analysis Year 2009 - -- Grade= 0 Nath Aran 4'-� - 1 0 iY = R _ fit' __ L '=14 i_4 '" = TR 4 -� i Grade= 0 -�- --`•,--�--1�T1'_i"'_� 111 LR 1 J - I I - v � Grade- �/�' = LTR I .�.:.�-.r+:a�r{ '�/o�timexand Timm In _ut": �� .��,,�':= EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT me (vph) 52 639 693 60 66 86 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Actuated (P/A) A P P P A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 I Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 10.0 11.0 12.0 14.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 p7 08 g G = 6.0 G = 52.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = f7.0 G = G = G = Y= 5 Y= 5 Y = 0 Y = 0 Y = 5 y = Y= Y= hhuration of Analysis (hrs)_ 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 ea of � ar - w k7dpoC 1'O PPeal�l fi�kl3trya .AM ._1113 mail IN I mx Ojp t, e�5Et'l 't10T7 s. . :x..e.a .G 'r. ,. ar� -e . .sc. EB WB NB SB ( l LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT T Volume 52 639 693 60 66 18 49$ 096 096 (F96" 095 L 3�L Proportion of LT or RT 1 000 0-000 0 080 ".° w+raamgg,u:.` . . � "- -. 1900 1900 1900 1900 Base Satflow _ 1 1 1 0 1 Number of Lanes 0 0.933 0.967 1 1.000 1.067 t fw. 0.960 0.980 0.980 0.980 fHV I-�\ f9 1.000 1.000 1.000 l� 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 } fp 1J 1.000 1.000 1.000F10 fbb - 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLu - - - - flT -00 0.950 1.000 10 0.979 0.245 0.245 Secondary fLT 1.000 0.989 _ _ 0.924 fIRT 1 - - .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLpb - __ 1.000 - 1.000 fRpb Adjusted Satflow - 1652 1801 1843 1796 -� Secondary Adjusted Satflow 426 441 l �.Hrs.t.i � i a�rou �daa ervec�aartcc E - . -ra�+',��'��'C. f p r_g 9 < - A� ... - _-•` g.,,,e IN -Project Description Main Rd (NYS 25) at Depot Ln (Build Sat Peak Hr Mitigated) EW Rs nffiffiI_0"� MON '7e =.2 .u _ I W- EB WB NB SB LaneGroup L T TR I . I I LR� AdjustedFlow Rate 54 666 785 „159 Satflow Rate 1652 1801 1843 1796 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.70 0.70 1 10.19 Lane Group Capacity 380 1261 1065 339 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.53 1 0.74 1 0.47 Flow Ratio 0.03 0.37 L- 0.43 1 0.09 Critical Lane Group Y N Y Y ��- Sum Flow Ratios 0.55 -� Lost TimelCycle 15.00 Critical vlc Ratio 0.66 EB WB NB SB e Group L T TR LR lusted Flow Rate 54 666 785 159 Lane Group Capacity 380 1261 1065 339 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.53 0.74 0.47 Green Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.58 0.19 Uniform Delay d1 6.4 6.4 14.0 11 32.5 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.50 1 0.50 1 1 0.11 FIncremental Delay d2 0.2 1.6 4.6 1.0 Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ntrol Delay 6.6 8.0 18.5 33.5 Lane Group LOS A J A 8 C Approach Delay 7.9 18.5 33.5 Approach LOS A B C Intersection Delay 15.4 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright 02005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TI'S Version 521 Generated: 1115/2007 3:15 • Appendix C Architectural Plans & Renderings g • • Appendix C I Architectural Floor Plans, Charles W Kuehn, Architect Last Revised November, 2006 Sheet A-1 NFirst Floor Plan, Units A-E (8.5 x 11) Sheet A-1 First Floor Sheet A 2 Second Floor • Sheet A-3- Lower Level Sheet A-4- Elevations • I I i HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE - COMMUNITY CENTER k h d II 4 l i 7 1 T ' „C& I ^ 0 . -•I. Icci3 m Co ___ __ ___ _ _ r----------- _ __ ___ __-- 0------- E�-------Q ------0—---—E) ------� Q 0 I I I I Q N I I II I � ._� • Ib ' ' I I ZD I I I i I I I I I I BANQUET ROOM TOILET BANG OM N T KITCHEN ------0----------0----- r------ I I TOL T STORAGE i COAT i o - I - J c DELIVERYv v ' a CONSEAIRS ® L+.I •. OFFICE DESK o... LIBRARY / LOUNGE IIH + Lj MAIL t STORAGE N Lv PICK-UP t- CARD ROOM OFFICE N � , N •o s date: NOVEMBER 5cale: 1/4' _ 1 -0" . drawn by: C.W.Kuehn 11 6'-6' 12'-0' 6'-6' 12'-6' 15'-1B• checked by, prolad no: 24000 5C # , FIRST FL00 PL-AN A - 1 T 1 /8" _ 1I— oll drawlrq tale' FIRST FLOOR .i. COMMUNITYCENTER HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE CE CIO I w � Ih 6 ... � - x3rX ' m'z _ (nI opo U aoV_ ' r�------- ��----- b�------ ?_ _--� �h T-_ - o� z N . (I, I I I I I I I I I I BANQUET ROOM BELOW � I STORAGE - RE4DING LOUNGE LOUNGE ® o `i C7 O BUSINES CONE RM. MULTI_ PURPOSE RM. ~" „ 'z C m . o ' a Z date; NOVEMBER,20,06 scale; 1/4' = i'_D. . drawn by: C.W.Kuehn checked'bq: SECOND FLQOR PLAN proect 244 000 " 1 /811 = 1 '- 0° sheet # ,.q— 2 drawlNq We SECOND FLOOR, n i i -77 I HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE - COMMUNITY CENTER i z � � N W arms . � Q (0 o I m wu� : o � Cn INDOOR POOL U oto I vil N- 1 I Q ZN BILLIARD / GAME ROOM EXERCISE ROOM 0 b i i o WOMEN'S LOCKERS MEN'S LOCKERS W OILETS / SOWERS TOILETS / SHOWERS 0 0 ❑ ' o o ❑ mo . FIRS AID zw _ . UTILITY SAUNA SAUNA r7 N ~, a ..-Ij . . p O. date! ` NOVEMBER 2008 -' 'scale; drawn by: C.W.Kuelin checked by: LOWER LEVEL PLAN pr°'�`�" 24000 1 /8" = 1 '- 0" eheeb #, A3 drawlnq bide LOWER LEVEL - I milli I w � LL LO x 3 x' 011< < iffmillirmlirmliffirml - - o, ILU cn = OD, J- I -" j Z CI4 FTTI ® Eg . 0 EE _ ® a FRO T_ ELEVATION r1 /8 to 1 '-0" - T O C. N 0 O O - uj ® ® ® ED Z CL QHIM IM FPMI N date, JANUARY 2007 scale; drawn by: REA ELEVATION °.W`Kueh° checked 1 /8 = 1 '-0" praject no:' sheet # ' drawinq tale ELEVATIONS r- lAlZ 2 il U rrasrr �`� YF a�� 3i ff� V)O d w� J Q � 2 m () m r-r..-r y�y� uunx aem � a w.w BOOp E e.. ha.lu M4eW SECOND FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "A" FIRST FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "A" RL AREA . BW S.F. I/1' - 1'-0- 80011 AREA 2. 0 S.F. 1/1' . 1•_0' CMAM AREA 180 SF. 'k^' A-7 air /3'-0' �Y09Y Lbw Z D 1 - - w0 a�mxw � ^� r i Ma vee sew W.rve b,"I¢ oll mx.�+ FIRST FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "B" FLOOR AREA - 1.930 S.F. 1/C- I'-0" �~+ A-1 a 42'-6' Yo Ln w( a ---—__— --------- ¢ s m w i .�.v.a ----------=-- w-wr hN�r yen. FIRST FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "C" SECOND FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "C" r Lw AREA - ZM SF. i/4-- I'-*' FLOGR AREA - �.so S.F. 1/4-- r-o' A-1 GARAGE AREA - X60 SF. d� 11 F AU Ldi u " Yki L9� __ _ Nu : ryry Q S a�mm m —_L---__—----- $ 0 E w. . bawl" Je.W lv wxn w FIRST FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "D" SECOND FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "D" FLOOR AREA 2095$.F. 1/Y- 1'-0• FLOOR AREA 070 S.F. 1/P— 1'-7 A—'I WAGE AREA - 423 SF. y z Z) Q � U o a f 0 A�ayyya g w..� �R FIRST FLOOR PLAN - UNIT "E" SECOND FLOOR PLAN - UNIT "E" 1/A' FLOOR AREA - 1,970 S.F. FLOOR AREA - 1,080 S.F. WAGE AREA — {p0 Si. b�— Appendix C-2 Architectural Renderings • • ' c /r _�, r t � l � a `• �] C ✓+jlvvr t / eww l' � + Y '...,: . fir Yirl�l;- .� 1/yi� �Y1��✓/�` q'. "1: Jil o f 1°� K I s • !1 !°`�'� � iINTERIOR VIEW OF A,r�ln 3�W1 tj� f �4 1M �Y 1 fh #: l si � • • . R• m . AI )[[jj .`u q i i �yy.vi. M bR r. I YEAR PLANTING f 1 f yp. i N � PCA -�vii' •. �� i1 I, wf, s .ray b 5+ YEAR GROW-INdw'i VEGETATED BERM 3RD r r • Appendix C-3 Existing Multi-Family Development Character Comparison • • J D s = I I v w , o = o v CD CD N O otitis Z <� O 0 r O o � n o D N 4i'OO�F O N qT W Z °R O00 N hpRTON S O !°h�R $$0 A dry LbpN NpRTH �y N y v dp Nn01` z mA :Z CHAB S N 1 9 O Z R2j CO 48 2 o �' RoGT R F O d ONO, o 0 Y o O\ yG O y � O 0 NO O 25 RT2S IV i0 <°NG MO S v y CRAB CREEK towdoo N z m w T °y H 9 m O y NP G C ^ ,� NF NNy FOS 1:80dN33 'y A yo K O O m O,��j� 9�t tip n Z m O *dM9N 2 c. y 213 O21tlJ �dT /�t/,�S OA O�N N l`' p IH Z N `1 Z O Nd She<�R m \Xd I WA N P tomo tlB VA p D y m� N t! �+.'p�9 z FR AM ISLA z 3 /( SI W'da g W O y0 Td C y�� m < tl 0 O Z m °o m AO LL lb x Y ;o c m ab3 z o c a Z m m �°p NO z Nabi PF x RA XE ti r a _ r 4! . S w ^R ' J + u i jr IL y x i ^X .. APT / ^ t er JI . m. •. a, • 1. - `' 4. s iy r V.1 \S i v W • e.. ..�`. JASMINE Pc c• FIGURE " AHD ZONING AREA 2 t Y, Source: NYSGISOithoiiN&P,ma 2er12008 arm,2007 ��1 .., . . �^ � t •.. - Photos by N& 1 1 0 w P 1 1 inch = 200 feet r � S , � f • '� r r s ; � • \ , ,M� . 4. Nisk 14 1 ., Aip z. - , hay .i'',-�..v.. ' i•°Y.� 2>*�i' �. �,,.e y_jl �� -,. i -4 4 . ' _ } 4 41 d , ��.,�1 r�`���w _ . M y i. _..�. .s ,. a "�r �y " ��•r�f M r! Y r . r VO At 1 ' f R .` : F Y 1 Y a y ,t • `� a�Y f q � •t 11 Mug -all • • 8 W.*E inch 200 feet a� ♦v ------------- 4 F - 1 s a'� .r si }}pp� } N . r 1 14 50 Ilk ` � 1ct N o ' W E m W Q P w �N �r 2 o a ( V w EZ L T U (n d , 0 �. z`a d e f V r r n� I y ; ; i� r. i 1 , F Fla 1 01 a+ \ vj_ e goo now 4100 MMMP look t ``Y F v \ h ,, .; . . ' ,. �. �" 6 �� F 4\ .:,i.:�.`A�� >.ro r 1. v `� ,� f i S }i � � � M nV ,�� W' k f �� t. a �. � :• �. pp � 9� � � .•.�' '�.{. \ aT9 /� � - y- �j' -' ,, r �i r '. M.. 1.- (. / .ym. _ r _. ' �� 1� �� _� 1. J GREEN SHIELD ECOLOGY, INC. 703 CARLENE DRIVE BRIDGEWATER, NEW JERSEY 08807 STEVEN N.HANDEL, PH.D.,HON.ASLA LANDSCAPE RESTORATION CERTIFIED SENIOR ECOLOGIST (ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA) NJ OFFICE 732-932.4516 PRESIDENT CELL 908-881-0383 FAX 908.526-4550 CAOFFIcE 949.733-3061 May 5, 2008 Mr. Robert Grover Greenman-Pedersen,Inc- 325 West Main Street Babylon,NY 11102 Re: Botanical survey, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, NY Dear Mr. Grover, At your request, we surveyed the plant species of this site on April 30, 2008, and then determined the species identity of all living plants on site. Names of these 62 species are enclosed, with general habitat type where the plants grow here. The character of this plant community is typical of local old and abandoned farms. Fully half of the species are not native to North America, but are agricultural weeds brought in by settlers over the past 300 years. There are no species present which are rare or endangered or protected by special environmental statues. The landscape is typical of the regional flora where past land uses have replaced the original, historic vegetation with plant communities associated with human-dominated land. Thank you for asking us to visit this community. I also attach the professional qualifications of my field team and myself. Yours truly, Steven N. Handel, Ph.D. Cert. Senior Ecologist Flora of Cutcho ue, property NW of Schoolhouse Lane MEN= NEW= Acer I latanoides L I Norway maple wooded margin Acerpseudatanus L _ — — s camore maple _ wooded margin Acer rubrum L. red maple — wooded margin Ailanthus altissima MITI ) Swingle --� -- tree of heaven _ y — — — wooded margin Ailia_ria petiolate Bieb.) Cay. & Grande garlic mustard -- N- along gravel path Allium vineale L. wdd arlic — wooded margin . ,_._. -.._.-._..._...... ..__,__ __._ __�—_—W _ _ .. . _._._M..._._.._._..-_� Anthoxanthum odoratum L. sweet vernal grass open field Aprocynum .. . ... .. _ . __._.. doc _bbane _� .. .._ _ open field _. Arabido sis thaliana L. He nh. mouse-ear cress open field Baccharis halimifolia L. eastern baccharis open field Barbarea vul aris R: Br, ex Ait. garden yellow rocket along gravel path Berberis thunber ii DC. Japanese barberry wooded margin Betula L. birch open field Cardamine hirsuta L. hairy bittercress open field Celastrus orbiculataiThunb. Oriental bittersweet wooded margin Dactylisglomerate L, — �— orchardgrass open field Daucus carota L. Queen Anne's lace open field/along gravel path Draba verna L. spring draba along gravel path Elaea, gnus umbellate Thunb. autumn olive open field Euon mus L, s indletree; winter creeper(possibly) Euthemia Nutt, ex Cass. goldentop _—_ open field Galium aparine L. _.............__.____._._ stick�will� open field ieracium L. hawkweed open field Juncus L. rush open field Juniperus virgin lana L. eastern redcedar open field ..........____. ___..._._.....,. .__..._..._.. . Lamium ur ureum:L. ur le deadnettle along gravel path __..___P..._E—._._.�__....._.......-_..__.__..__.._-..,.._ P. P__ _,_..__-.._.. __..--..___.. Lonicera japonica Thunb. 'J anese hone suckle wooded margin/along gravel path Lonicera morrowii A; Gray Morrow's hone suckle along gravel path Malus P. Mill. a le wooded margin/along gravel path Morella pensylvanica.Q} irbel) Kartesz _ northern bei b r _ - — open field Morns alba L. white mulberry edge of Populus grove Oenothera biennis L. common evening.primrose - along gravel path Onoclea sensibilis L'. sensitive fern open field Osmunda cinnamomea L. cinnamon fern open field uin, Parthenocissus Ruefolia (L.) Planch. ex DC. Virginia creeper wooded margin Pinus thunbergii Pari. y Japanese black pine - N open field Planta o lanceolata L. w r _ narrow leafplantain `- w_- along gravel path Planta o mayor LM ---� ` common plantain along gravel path Poa bulbosa L. bulbous bluegrass along gravel path ..-._._._......_ -_r__._..._.._...,.._._.-._ Po ulus tremuloides, Michx. quaking aspen . grove along_..�_.___.....__._.,_.._.,_....._...__,...._._.�..._....._.__.__..__.._.,_. 9 NW property line Potentilla simplexMichx. - _ common cinquefoil Prunus aviuq?�L_) L sweet cherry wooded margin Prunus serotina Ehrh. black cherry open field/wooded margin Quercus _ ,.... _._..-_._.. ....___.. _._. __._ .... velutina Lam. black oak open field Rhus co allinum L. winged sumac _ open field Robinia pseudo-acacia L. black locust grove along SW of property Rosa multiflora Thunb. ex Murr. multiflora rose along gravel path/open field/wooded ms Rubus allegheniensiS Porter ex Bailey sensu lato Allegheny blackberrX-- wooded margin __ ._. _.._.._ _ Rubus fia ellaris Wilid northern dewb�M _ wooded margin Rumex acetosella L common sheep sorrel open field/along gravel path Rumex crispus L. curly dock along gravel path Schizach rium scoparium (Michx. Nash little bluestem open field Smilax rotundifolia L. roundleaf greenbriar wooded margin Solidago L.S mph otgoldenrod - - open field richum Nees. aster open field Taraxacum officinale Weber ex Wi common dandelion along gravel path Thelypteris Schmid.: _ - _ maiden fern`--�„ open field Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Kuntze oison ivy along gravel path/open field/wooded me Trifolium repens L. white clover along gravel path Verbascum tha sus L. common mullein open field/along gravel path _ .__.__- -_....._..._..-_.------- L: ----_...._...__ Veronica arvensis corn speedwell ._._._._._,. open field/along gravel path GREEN SHIELD ECOLOGY, INC. 703 CARLENE DRIVE BRIDGEWATER, NEW JERSEY 08807 STEVEN N.HANDEL, PH.D.,HoN.ASLA LANDSCAPE RESTORATION CERTIFIED SENIOR ECOLOGIST (ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA) N.1 OFFICE 732.932-4516 PRESIDENT CELL 908-881-0383 FAx 908-526-4550 CA OFFICE 949-733-3061 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND OF STEVEN N. HANDEL Academic positions: 1996 present. Professor, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University,New Brunswick,NJ. [Department Chair, 1996-7]. Director, Center for Urban Restoration Ecology. (1999—present) Member, Graduate Program in Ecology &Evolution, and Graduate Program in Plant Biology [Director, 1986-891. 2007—present. Adjunct Professor, University of California at Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. 1985 - 1996. Associate Professor of Biology, Rutgers University. 1979-1985. Associate Professor of Biology, Yale University. Director, Yale University Botanical Garden,New Haven, Connecticut. 1976-1979. Assistant Professor of Biology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. Education: B.A. Columbia College, Major in Biological Sciences, 1969. M.S. Cornell University, Field of Ecology &Evolutionary Biology, 1974. PTLD. Cornell University, Field of Ecology &Evolutionary Biology, 1976. Additional Appointments: 1983 -present. Certified Senior Ecologist, Ecological Society of America 2004—present. Member, State of New Jersey Invasive Species Council. 1992 - 2004. Associate editor, RESTORATION ECOLOGY. 2002- 2004 Editorial Board,URBAN HABITATS 1997-2001. Elected member, Board of Directors, Society for Ecological Restoration. 1998—present, Member,National Council, American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS). 1996 - 2004. Member, Institute for Ecology and Environmental Management (U. K.) 2 1996 - present. Member, Board of Directors, Metropolitan New York Forest Ecosystems Council. 1995 - 1996. President, Torrey Botanical Society. 1996, Co-chair, Annual Meeting of the Society for Ecological Restoration, held at Rutgers University, June 17-22. 1995 - 1996. Chair, Plant Population Ecology Section, Ecological Society of America. 1991-1994, Member, Board of Professional Certification, Ecological Society of 2007-present America. 1987- 1990. Associate Editor, EVOLUTION. 1989 - 1993. Visiting Research Scholar, School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney,Australia 1987. Summer faculty, University of Virginia, Mountain Lake Biological Station, Blacksburg, Virginia. (Course on Plant-Animal Interactions.) 1984. Summer faculty, Rocky Mountain Biological Station, Crested Butte, Colorado. (Course on Plant-Animal Interactions.) 1983 - 1985. Chairman, Genetics Section, Botanical Society of America. Member of the Following Professional Societies: Society for Ecological Restoration International Ecological Society of America (Aldo Leopold Leadership Fellow) British Ecological Society Botanical Society of America Torrey Botanical Society Society for the Study of Evolution Society for Conservation Biology Natural Areas Association American Association for the Advancement of Science (Fellow) Australian Institute of Biology (Fellow) American Society of Landscape Architects (Honorary Member) Sasha W. Eisenman Staff Botanist ACADE NIIC BACKGROUND Ph.D. Candidate, Rutgers University- School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Plant Biology Graduate Program, 2004-present B.Sc. in Horticulture, Delaware Valley College,Dept. of Horticulture, 2001 TEACHING EXPERIENCE 2007 - Teaching Assistant, Advanced Plant Systematics and Plant Diversity and Evolution 2006 - Teaching assistant, Advanced Plant Systematics and Taxonomy of Vascular Plants Engineering, Project SUPER summer enrichment program for undergraduate women 2005 - Lecturer, The International Cooperative Biodiversity Groups (ICBG) Central Asia Program 2005 Training Course in Biodiversity Documentation, Tashkent, Uzbekistan and Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2004-2007 - Collections Manager, Chrysler Herbarium, Rutgers University 2004-2007 - Mentor,federal work study herbarium curatorial assistants 2004-2007 - Webmaster, Chrysler Herbarium, Rutgers University I 2004-2007 - Webmaster, International Cooperative Biodiversity Group, Central Asia `-. Program<http://icbg.rutgers.edu> 2002-2004 - Herbarium Curatorial Assistant, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 2001-2002 - Plant Protection Intern,The Morris Arboretum of the University of Pennsylvania ACTIVE BOTANICAL RESEARCH PROJECTS The genetic diversity and phytochemical variation in wild populations of wild tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus L.) Estimating genetic diversity in an ex situ collection of Dawn redwood(Metaseguoia glyptostroboides Hu& Cheng)using AFLP The persistence of plant species introduced via 19a'century ballast dumps BOOKS S.W. Eisenman, D. Zaurov&L. Struwe (eds.), Medicinal Plants of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. Submitted to the Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Sept,2007. POSTERS AND PUBLISHED ABSTRACTS Jan., 2008- S.W. Eisenman, A. Poulev, L. Struwe and I. Raskin. Genetic and Phytochemical variation in the medicinal plant wild tarragon (Artemisia 1 dracunculus L.) - Presented at the 2008 Northeast Region Annual Meeting of the American Society for Horticultural Science [poster] Jan., 2008 - S.W. Eisenman, A.Novy, R. Raviram, L. Struwe, S. Bonos and J. Grabosky Assessing the Genetic Diversity of an ex situ Germplasm Collection of Dawn Redwoods Hu et Cheng) - Presented at the 2008 Northeast Region Annual Meeting of the American Society for Horticultural Science [poster] July, 2007 - L. Struwe, S. Dushenkov, S.W. Eisenman, M. Tadych, &I. Raskin "International Education in Biodiversity and Biodocumentation— Collaborative Approaches" - Presented at the ICBG conference in Tadjikistan July 2006 - S.W. Eisenman, K. Dulatas, H.E. Clennon and L. Struwe `Ballast Dumps . from the late 1800's". 2006 annual meeting of the Botanical Society of America. [poster] Oct. 2004 - L. Struwe, M. Tadych and S.W. Eisenman. Poster entitled`Bioprospecting in the Age of Phylogenetic Trees: Influence of Evolutionary Data on Evaluation of Natural Products". 2004 Meeting of the International Cooperative Biodiversity Groups (ICBG). [poster] May 2004 - S.W. Eisenman, J. Macklin and L. McDade. "Lessons in Integrated Pest Management: The Herbarium of The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia". Annual meeting of the Society for Preservation of Natural History Collections (SPNHC). [poster] PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Life member, Philadelphia Botanical Club Member, The Society for Economic Botany Member, Flora of New Jersey Project- Information Technology Committee 2 Steven D. Glenn Senior Research Assistant New York Metropolitan Flora Project, brooklyn Botanic Garden EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Purdue University, 1992 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1994 to present Brooklyn Botanic Garden, Brooklyn, NY - Senior Research Assistant Involved in the New York Metropolitan Flora project for the past 14 years with extensive knowledge of the local flora of the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut tri-state area. - regional floristic.work - field specimen collection and identification - herbaria research - database management - species distribution map production - authorship and research of WWW plant information - invasive species analysis 1993 to 1994 Holden Arboretum, Kirtland, OH - Mapping Specialist - computerized mapping, identification and databasing of living plant collections 1990 to 1991 Brookside Gardens, Wheaton, MD - Horticultural Intern - mapping, identification, evaluation and databasing of living plant collections - computerized manufacture of interpretive signage PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS Moore, G. A., S. D. Glenn, & J. Ma. In Press. Distribution of the native Aralia spinosa and non-native Aralia elata (Araliaceae) in the northeastern United States: Rhodora, Glenn, S. D. and K. Barringer. 2004. Cardamine impatiens L. (Brassicaceae) in New Jersey.Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 131(3):257-260. Glenn, S. D. 2001. The rediscovery of Ledum groenlandicum Oeder (Ericaceae) in New Jersey. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 128(4):407-408. i HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE WILDLIFE INVENTORY SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK Nest on Neo- Common Name Scientific Name (1) Site Habitat Tropical Migrant Birds Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis P G N Ring-necked Pheasant Phasianus colchicus P M N Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginfanus P M N Mourning.Dove Zenaida asiatica Y E N Chimney Swig Chaetura pelagica N M, C Y Downey Woodpecker Picoides ubescens Y L N Northern Flicker Cola tes auratus P L, M Y Eastern Phoebe Sayornis phoebe P E Y White-eyed Vireo Vireo riseus Y E y Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata Y L N American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Y G N Tree Swallow Tachycineta bicolor P M Y Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica N M Y Black-capped Chickadee Poecile atrica illus Y L, E N Tufted Titmouse Baeolo hus bicolor Y L N Red-breasted Nuthatch Sitta canadensis N W N White-breasted Nuthatch Sitta carolinensis N W N Brown Creeper Certhia americana N W Y Carolina Wren Thryothorus ludovicianus Y L, E Y House Wren Troglodytes aedon Y L, E Y Golden-crowned Kinglet Regulus sats a N L, E Y Wood Thrush H locichla mustelina P L y American Robin Turdus migratorius Y L, E, M Y Gray Catbird Dumetella carolinensis Y E Y Northern Mockingbird Mimus oly lottos Y E N European Starling Sturnus vulgaris Y C N Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia Y E Y Common Yellowthroat Geothly is trichas Y E y Scarlet Taneger Piran a olivacea N L, E, M Y Eastern Towhee Pipilo erytho htalmus Y E Y Chipping Sparrow S izella passerina Y L, E Y Field Sparrow S izella usilla Y M N Song Sparrow Melos iza melodia Y M, E N White-throated Sparrow Zonotrichia albicollis N L, E N Dark-eyed Junco Junco hyemalis N L, E N Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Y E N Red-winged Blackbird A -elaius hoeniceus . Y. E. Y. Common Grackle Quiscalus quiscalus Y L, E Y House Finch Carpodacus mexicanus Y L N American Goldfinch Carduelis tristis Y E N r� House S arrow Passar domesticus Y C N Nest on Neo- Common Name Scientific Name (1) Site Habitat Tropical Migrant Mammals Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana Y G Eastern Mole Scola us a uaticus Y M Little Brown Bat Myotis lucifugus Y C Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagus oridanus Y E, M Eastern Chipmunk Tamias striatus Y E, L Gray Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Y E, L White-footed Mouse Pemmyscus leuco is Y E, L, M Meadow Vole Microtus pennsylvanicus Y E, L, M Raccoon Procyon lotos Y G NOTES: 1) Avian nomenclature is based on the 41" supplement to the American Ornithologist's Union Checklist of North American Birds (1997) HABITAT NOTES: L-Woodland, E-Edges, M-Fields/Meadows, C-Cultural Features, G-Generalist NEST ON SITE NOTES: Y-Yes, N-No, P-Possible/Probable 0:\2007\2007340\WILDLIFE INVENTORY.doe Robert Grover Project Personnel Director of Environmental Services GPI - EDUCATION: BS/1972/Environmental Sciences COURSE WORK: 1999 - FHWA Traffic Noise Modeling, Orlando, Florida YEARS WITH THIS FIRM: 38 YEARS WITH OTHER FIRMS: 0 Professional Profile Mr. Grover is an environmental scientist/engineer who has been with GPI for many years. He provides hazard analysis, environmental designs, recommendations, and support for major projects in both the public and private sectors. He has a comprehensive grasp of legal, social, and political considerations and their environmental ramifications. In addition, Mr. Grover has functioned as the environmental quality review agent for numerous communities. This experience at the local community level is very important in conducting local coordination for large state projects. He has coordinated over 250 environmental regulatory permit proceedings with State and Federal Agencies. Mr. Grover oversees GPIs regulatory compliance with regard to environmental regulations and has been responsible for obtaining over 500 Federal and State environmental permits. He has been responsible for a major portion of GPIs environmental impact statements and has prepared over 100 environmental reports for major highway and bridge projects, parks and recreation facilities, public buildings, solid waste management facilities, and resource management plans. Mr. Grover is a noted authority on coastal environments. Mr. Grover has extensive experience over the last 37 years relating to coastal management studies, wetland projects, environmental impact investigations and erosion studies. Mr. Grover is thoroughly familiar with state-of-the-art methods of environmental analysis requiring specialized services such as ecology and geomorphology. He is also a member of the South Shore Estuary Council. A well known environmental expert, Mr. Grover serves on numerous organizational boards and committees, and delivers numerous lectures. For many years, he lectured on Environmental Law at Southampton College. He writes environmental articles for periodicals, including a regular conservation column for an Audubon publication. He was the recipient of the 2001 Conservation Award, presented by the Great South Bay Audubon Society. He is also an environmental law lecturer to the Nassau County Bar Association. In 2003, Mr. Grover delivered a lecture at the San Antonio meeting of the International Bridge Tunnel & Turnpike Association titled "Wildlife Considerations in Transportation Infrastructure Planning". Project Experience Mr. Grover is thoroughly familiar with state-of-the-art methods of environmental analysis requiring specialized services such as the following: Field Ecology in a wide array of habitats iland and Coastal processes es a 1 d er ehabitrosion/sedimentation studies. Hydrogeological and groundwater studies. Endangered, Threatened, Special Concern and Rare Species Robert Grover Project Personnel Director of Environmental Services GPI - Representative projects on which Mr. Grover has provided these services include: Sebonacle Neck Private Golf Course Property, Southampton, NY; 2001-Present. Director of Environmental Sciences. Work on this project included scope analysis, wetlands, endangered species, Audubon certification assistance, and irrigation analysis and coordination. Mr. Grover prepared complete EIS, habitat inventory, Natural Resources Management Plans, wildlife inventory, native habitat restoration plan and water resources protection plan for 298-acre waterfront property. Client: Private Smith Point County Park, Brookhaven, NY; 2002-Present. Environmental Director. Project involves architectural, structural, civil and MEP for new camp ground entry building, storage shed, fishing pier and a new boardwalk. Beach erosion control and landscape architecture. Prepared coastal processes analysis, ecological assessments and regulatory coordination for various improvements at large oceanfront park community. Client: SCDPW Roosevelt State Park Ecological Study, NY; 2004. Project Ecologist. Prepared avian species inventory and impact analysis. Client: Rutgers University Dept. of Ecology Port Jefferson Harbor Coastal Energy Impact Program; 1985. Project to inventory marine traffic, navigation needs, and mooring areas. Client: Town of Brookhaven Annapolis Neck Park, MD; 1993. Environmental Scientist. Prepared habitat and wildlife evaluations for use in planning a large park complex on the Chesapeake Bay. Client: City of Annapolis West Point Golf Course, NY; 1995. Environmental Scientist, Conducted detailed habitat evaluations and wildlife studies at United States Military Academy for a golf course rehabilitation project. Client: USACOE Cohoes Waterford Arterial, NY; 1987. Environmental Scientist. Directed preparation of complete DEIS including wetland inventories and mitigation. Client: NYSDOT, Reg. 1 Brick Hill Subdivision, NY; 1996. Environmental Scientist. Conducted habitat fragmentation study and evaluation of impacts on resident and migratory passerine birds, for an 80-acre residential subdivision. Client: Private Davids Island DEIS, NY; 1996. Served as project ornithologist for biological inventory of an island in Long Island Sound being studies for possible development. Client: Private Fire Island Inlet Dredging, NY; 1994. Served as endangered species monitor for Piping Plovers and Least Terns, to prevent impacts from a beach nourishment project. Was responsible for monitoring report required by State environmental officials. Client: Private Norwalk Country Club, CT; 1990. Environmental Scientist. Prepared habitat impact reports as expert testimony regarding proposed construction of a large marina and morning facility on Long Island Sound. Client. Private Robert Grover Project Personnel Director of Environmental Services G PI • Gardiners and Robins Island, NY; 1987. Environmental Scientist. Provided habitat inventories, including a host of endangered and threatened species habitats, for appraisals of New York's two most valuable privately owned islands. Client: County of Suffolk Harbor Links Golf Course, Port Washington, NY; Ongoing. Environmental Scientist. Preparing habitat maps, wetland delineation and impact studies, and restoration ecology studies for development and reclamation of a former sand and gravel mine. Client: Town of North Hempstead Amboy Bridge Wetland Improvement, Staten Island, NY; 1996. Environmental Scientist. As part of this highway improvement project, provided design of wetland mitigation along Amboy Bridge creek. Client: NYCDOT Northern State Parkway, Nassau County, NY; 1987-1995. Environmental Scientist. Prepared complete noise and water quality studies. Noise analysis involved modeling of 18,000 feet of barrier and indoor sound level measurements at schools and churches. Water analysis involved both surface and groundwater impact analysis. Client: NYSDOT, Reg. 10 Adirondack Bridges Environmental Assessments; 1988-1993. Environmental Scientist. Prepared noise modeling (STAMINA 2.00 PTMA) fox replacement bridges (new alignments) in environmentally sensitive Adirondack Park. Client: NYSDOT, Reg. 1 Caldor Shopping Center DEIS; 1994. Project manager for complete draft and final Environmental Impact Statement for a new shopping center. Noise levels and impacts on surrounding residential property were considered in detail. Client: Rothwood Real Estate Service Ordinance Preparation, Suffoll2 County, NY; 1985. Environmental Scientist. Mr. Grover has authored numerous local environmental protection ordinances including community noise regulations for Villages of Babylon, Lindenhurst and Valley Stream. He has also trained local code enforcement personnel in noise measurement. Client: Numerous Route 109, Suffolk County, NY; 1991. Environmental Scientist. This project, nearing completion, involved waterq uality analysis and regulatory coordination for construction of new drainage system and outfall with impact mitigation in the form of detention basins and leaching basins. Client: NYSDOT, Reg. 10 Route 25A, Nassau and Suffolk Counties, NY; 1992. Environmental Scientist. Prepared detailed water iv eluded consideration o wetland resources tidal and freshwater quality analysis for sensitive watershed. Study m n ron f , systems, and inventories of project area wildlife supported by area wetlands and surface waters. Client: NYSDOT, Reg. 10 SEQR Assistance, Rockville Centre, Nassau County, NY; 1987-1994. Served as lead agency consultant for review of proposal for hospital, parking structure and condominiums. Conducted scoping sessions with applicant, directed extensive DEIS modifications, and prepared Statement of Findings. Client: Rockville C• Centre Robert Grover Project Personnel Director of environmental Services GPI • Regulatory Coordination, Gardiners Island, Suffouz County, NY, 1990. Environmental Scientist. Currently assisting owners of this private estate in the development of plans for shoreline and navigation channel maintenance, and preparing and coordinating all permit applications and documentation for Federal, State and Town regulatory authorities. Client: Private Expert Testimony, Nassau and Snffohlz County, NY; Ongoing. Mr. Grover regularly serves as an expert witness on environmental impacts at public hearings throughout Long Island and at NYSDEC adjudicate and Town regulatory authorities. Mr. Grover also provides this service to various Long Island law firms. Client: Numerous Other Activities Past President: Great South Bay Yacht Racing Association Club Measurer, Protest Committee Chair, and member: Babylon Yacht Club Member: South Bay Cruising Club Professional Affiliations American Association for the Advancement of Science Coastal Education and Research Foundation American Ornithologists Union New York State Ornithological Society Appendix E Soil Management Plan & Associated Soil Reports • • Appendix E-1 Pesticide Report Nelson & Pope November 8, 2007 V-2 ro .... ...... A-1- bark _W7 —C Vrl' Pesticide Report The Heritage @ Cutchogue Cutchogue, New York N&P Job# 00026 November 8, 2007 Pesticide Report The Heritage @ Cutchogue Cnfchogne,New fork' �. ... ._ . .sem h 1 Prepared For: Heritage @ Cutchogue,LLC 1921-D North Ocean Avenue Medford,New York 11763 j Pr red Nelson&Pope Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747 (631)427-5665 Long Island Analytical Laboratories,Inc. / 110 Colin Drive r Holbrook,New York 11741 L ' C C E Pesticide Report • The Heritage @ Cutchogue CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE. Page 1 of 11 2.0 SOIL.SAMPLING PROGRAM Page 3 of 11 2.1 Sample Collection Page 3 of 11 2.2 Sampling Program Rationale Page 3 of1l 3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page'4 of 11' 3.1 Analytical Test Methods Page 4 of 11 3.2 Analytical Results Page 4 of 11: 4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL Page 6 of 11 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Page 8 of 11 6.0 REFERENCES Page 10 of 11 APPENDICES Page 11 of 11 Pesticide Report The Heritage's Cutcfiogue 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Nelson & Pope, LLP has been contracted to prepare a Pesticide Report for the subject property. ' This report is intended to determine the concentration of pesticides and metals in site soils, since y used for weed and pest control in Long Island agricultural practice. these substances were widel _ The sublec roper consists of a 46 16 acre parcel of fallow faun field and wooded land located rnYlramlat�ofitchoeTonafS uth 1d New Aub 'ect �ane- =..K....�.� ro,e s ocatsd a the' rIostht est corse o � -�� � a�pro�tmat�L�l; ����eet�nar2h�o a�lfioa���ritch� �-`')~he_Parcel r- ie—.spec� ._ -� iderttfied as SCTI�I No 1000 102 1 33 3; Tins'documen�wrll be used to asci"stm evali2ttng the _ environmental and7or public lrealth`�implic'atrous regazdt>r�tti]e- curienti-�conceritr"attons», of agricultural chemicals in on-site soils: The sampling program was designed and completed by N&P. Laboratory analytical data was prepared by Long Is Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The protocol used to direct this investigation was based upon the guidance offered by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) in a report entitled Procedures for Municipalities to Evaluate the Need for C Soil Sampling and soil Management at Subdivisions or Other Construction Projects with Potentially Contaminated Soils. This SCDHS document is based on initial guidance from the New York State Department of Health Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment The following sections detail the subjectpe°lab alanysis and surrounding area characteristics, sampling program, ; protocol and quality [J A total of eighteen (18) soil samples were collected from nine (9) sampling locations situated throughout the property. Specifically, soil samples were collected from depths of 0-3 and 3-6 inches at each of the nine (9) sampling locations. Due to the past use of a majority of the [ property for agricultural purposes, the samples collected from five (5) locations were analyzed for the presence of pesticides and metals and the samples collected from the remaining four (4) r locations were analyzed for arsenic which is a common constituent associated with pesticides. L Initially, only the samples from the 0-3 inch intervals were analyzed. If any detected compounds within each individual sample were found to exceed their respective regulatory guidance values only then was the associated 3-6 inch interval sample analyzed. Review of the analytical results L revealed the presence of elevated levels of arsenic and mercury which exceeded there respective regulatory agency guidance values across the subject property. As a result the 3-6 inch interval lsamples were analyzed for the presence of arsenic and mercury only and the analytical results L., revealed elevated concentrations of both constituents. In order to identify the depth to which arsenic and mercury were present, soil samples were collected from the three (3) of the previous sampling locations which exhibited the highest concentrations. The following sections of this report outline the sampling measures n pro ides aprovimin Section illustrating the location of the samples collected. Appropriate recommendatio L_ ,l_ 2.0SAMPLING`AiND A14Xtym,,PROGRAIl4 (SAP} . 2 1 SAIYIPLE COLE CTION z • A total of eighteen (18) soil samples were collected_from nine {9) locations situated throughout the'siibject property on,October4, 2007 _The soil`samples were collected from dephs of 0 3 and 3 6;-inches below grade $amplEs collected from five,(5) of the locations Were analyzed for the presence of pesticides and-ret als and the samples collected from the reniaimng-'i:four (4) . locations were analyzed for arsenic wluch'is a wino on constituent associated with pesticide use The depths of the soil samples were selected to provide a profile of the soil located on the'sublect property Initially, only.the samples from the 0-3 inch intervals were analyzed '1# any-,deteeted compounds,within each' individual sample were found #o;exceed their respective regulato3y y' guidance,values only then was-the associated 6 luck interval;sample tested ' Results from liotli sample:intervals revealed the presence ofelevafed concentratlonsiof-:#wo (2)_metals and as a _regWit was concluded, that further sampling was necessary.to identify_the depth to`wlnch these inorganic compounds were present at the`snblect property Addihonal;sampling was conducted at- the`three (3); previous samplmg.locations which exhibited the highest concentrations and s- samples: were colleeted ;at depths of 9=12;inches,'15 18 inches and 21-24 inches below ground W surface on November 101 2007. 'Phe sampling schenne employed vas consistent with i ldance available from SCDHS as referencedherein A stainless steel;hand auger decontammated between uses (see Section 4 0), was used to'extract all of the soil samples xoni`the subject property.L Fig fire_l.:provid}es,amap that ldent fies-the various locations from`which the soil samples were collected. The topography of the'sulijecY property is relatively flat; 2 2 SAMPLING PROGRAM RATIOl�AI E.- Soil samples were collected_ in accordance with;the recommendations 1—ilie StDHS and NZ'SDOH,noted as follows.. samples were collected at depths of 0=3 3 6 9=32, 15 18 and 2i 24 inches " `samples were duected toward those areas likely to have accumulated the highest contaminant r'levels" samples.were analyzed for the presence ofpesticides and metals. Laboraiory analysis results are discussed in Section 3 0 Since the'proposed property-will be used for a residential subdivision the concentration of pesficides and metals, is an important "issue. In accordance with SCDHS and NYSDOH recommendations;the sampling and analysis Iirogram ' was.intended_to determine. ifsite activitres had caused degradation of soil quality on site, • :if a soil management plan (SNIP) is appropriate given the'concentration of contaminants and the intended use`ofthe site. The following. section provides the laboratory analysis for the site samples, including test methods and analytical results. l• - Page 2 of 11 . . ............. Sci p S- 7 7 3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS i � • 3.1 ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS The soil samples were transported to a New York State Certified Commercial ELAP Laboratory for analysis. Selection of the analytical test methods for the soil samples wasbased on the NYSDOH and SCDHS, recommended soil sampling parameters for agricultural soils on Long Island. Analysis of the soil samples consisted of pesticides and SCDHS metals for five (5) of the 0-3 inch samples and only arsenic for four (4) of the 0-3 inch samples. Review of the analytical results revealed that the 3-6 inch samples from all of the locations required testing. Specifically, all of the 3-6 inch samples were analyzed for arsenic and in addition, three (3) of the 3-6 inch samples were analyzed for mercury as well. Review of the results continued to reveal elevated concentrations of mercury and arsenic. In order to identify the depth to which arsenic and mercury were present, soil samples were collected from the three (3) of the previous sampling locations which exhibited the highest concentrations. A summary of the parameters analyzed for each sample is provided in Table 1. 3.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Review of the analytical results for the 0-3 inch interval samples revealed that the five (5) samples selected to be analyzed for pesticides all contained elevated levels of pesticide compounds. However, none of the pesticide compounds detected were found to exceed there . respective United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) or New York State Department' of Environmental Protection (NYSDEC) Technical Administrative Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) 4046 recommended soil cleanup objectives. In addition, each of these five (5) samples were also analyzed for the presence of metals. All of the samples were found to contain elevated levels of several metals. Of these metals detected, only arsenic was found to exceed its corresponding SCDHS guidance value of 4 mg/kg in all of the samples analyzed. In addition, mercury was found to exceed its corresponding NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective of 0.1 mg/kg in three (3) of the nine (9) samples analyzed but was detected below its corresponding USEPA SSL of 610 mg/kg. With regard to the four (4) 0-3 inch samples analyzed only for arsenic, all were found to contain elevated levels which exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. Based on the 0-3 inch sample results, the 3-6 interval samples from each of the locations were analyzed_as per the parameters summarized in Table 1. Review of the 3-6 inch interval sample results revealed that arsenic exceeded the SCDHS guidance value in all of the samples analyzed. With regard to mercury, it was found to be detected above its NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective in three (3) of the 3-6 inch samples analyzed and was also found to be below its USEPA SSL in each of these samples as well. 1 Page 4 411 Table 1 Ind4�1dual;Samp1�1'arameters _ (�'� Sar+rpl�Ienf�caLiau „ am`p1Deptli ; �gnalylfeaL?Parameter. _. m'• 0-3 Pesticides& SCDH Metals 3-6 Arsenic 9-12 Arsenic &Mercury 15-18 Arsenic &Mercury 21-d4 Arsenic &Mercury �^ 0 3 Pesticides&SCDH Metals 6 ' .5 me drKVIC7curt - '� - - - -• 15-18 Arsenlc&Mercury Arsenic &Mercury 0-3 Arsenic 3-6 Arsenic 9-12 Arsenic&Mercury IL - 15-18 Arsenic&Mercury 21-24 Arsenic &Mercury y5* 0-3 Pesticides& SCDH Metals 3-6 Arsenic&Mercury 9-12 Arsenic&Mercury 15-18 Arsenic&Mercury 21-24 Arsenic &Mercury 0-3 Pesticides& SCDH Metals 3-6 Arsenic 9-12 Arsenic &Mercury 15-18 Arsenic & Mercury 21-24 Arsenic &Mercury 0-3 Arsenic 3-6 Arsenic - 9-12 Arsenic&Mercurya � 15-18 Arsenic &Mercury 21-24 Arsenic&Mercury� . ' 0-3 Pesticides & SCDH Metals C- -_ 3-6 Arsenic &Mercury WY, . = 9-12 Arsenic &Mercury 15-18 Arsenic &Mercury L �S; £. 21-24 Arsenic & Mercury 0-3 Arsenic 3-6 Arsenic 9-12 Arsenic & Mercurys � 15-18 Arsenic &MercuryPINY � 21-24 Arsenic &Mercury L I EPat. 5 of 11 Based on the 3-6 inch sample results samples were collected from the 9-12', -15-13 and 21-24 inch intervals from the locations of PS-2, PS-5 and PS-9 to further evaluate the`vertical extent of arsenic and mercury contamination. Review—of the analytical results detected the presence of mercury in seven (7) of the nine (9) samples collected but none were found to exceed the USEPA SSL or NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective for mercury. Arsenic was detected in six (6) of the nine (9) samples collected and only one (1) exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. A summary of the analytical results is provided in Tables 2A, 2B and 2C. The original laboratory analysis sheets as provided by Long Island Analytical Laboratories; Inc. are presented in Appendix A of this document. Page 6 of 11 L. n ,I � y IIV Ir� 1'� Ipv� I I4 S A,}n 1 -'Awl l 1D TABLE12A t 0-3 INCL ANALYTICAL RESULTS 't & a r 4vfi Ff vnTnI•uidti�7Ni�A�i 30 r T?'��,tt¢'ril�`°'"��"n tib% ... +�'+�", r '. . ' wn NA : • : 25.4 12.3 '`.: , NA rfi s . 2"100: 4,4'-DDD 9 17.2 NA NA 399 345 NA 4,4'-DDE NA NA 701 441 NA � „' s y, 40 i.44�' 4 4'-DDT 1N179) 71 NA NA 16 8.50 NA 1 $t i T5A Dieldrin ND NA ': 18'v4 1A 470,000 900„ 7.40 ND NA NA � r9Q0�"° EndosulfanT 40.6 11 NA a94A ' 470,000 214 17.3 NA NA 1P40�� t#NA �, NS 1;Q00 Endosulfan II Ii00 4 Endosulfansulfete ]09 144 NA NA ND ND NA lPP Mow, 23,000 ' Endrin 6.70 12.1 NA NA ND ND NA ? *A I,OOD 8.60 9.30 NA NP S hlor ND NA NA 15.7 ND A 11e tac 4 4Methoxychlor ` m �-, 40* _ 17�5aotlS� Arsenic* , ,k +NIA 8.23 7.58 NA � f'� f �NA A, NS 25'ot,SB Chroruium 5.98 9019 NA NA 12.6 8.59 NA jl tr1tR4 el 610 ;0.11". Co er d„' 0.07 NA j tA'a• 1 600 13'or ST3 Mercu 0.06 �,ti0I8�Td NA NA 3.30 3.79 NA i' � r4 & rtNA' B�i Nickel I3.49 I2.70 NA NA 17.1 12.1 NA 1 �8 'TNA '.. 400 ;„. ry Lead r w Notes: See Table 2C +rid 1 oaf eSof19 'Phe Ber' utclloeRep rt lReport TABLE 2B F T p 3-6 INCH ANALYTICAL RESULTS 4M^'1,�,'A,W,IN�r9 Mw llf� i r���, i� e'�.� ii➢v!;I!{s � sz t•:' M � d'!rlq .� "'k. a �kr rM z,y,ry rs_ 5 wry a;+^1 w a ". vfl�I ,fit d Y! { r , � �.n n,l" 1c 'fi4 ' r�„•i4�';2' rTT�1Y", !vtvr�ray➢*r'V;.�`iJd�y ('µ .':'°/r6 I! � ,/Y�ae�i�`�,'.v` '~ct�'gy yt r`, wW:M r'"r'�trj*"'n;,,:? 4T(� ' t. `";rm, x�,y� *'.y� ��� * . 7�, �i' t+���p ,�'d/ i.ri , '',y(„ �i P! �, .+3 wy;{�+,➢ I iclfGrrru�Qw'q• 'id r3T til4' � r /1. .,"!�F k',Tx13�5't!�441'xr'Sk.l`{N` �l�d !";� {�/fe. ri�r�nr13'>cd 'r3jr� d/��F+MJ4� � 4v1,7iy{'lb� .%,`,ZK"4vt.�Y?' 1 }lon'V11���1f,1 ,} " t; )jT�txrlmt�'NAbtury"W'�`�'jk�la f I•-F! �.�� 41`jrY � 4,. d'. ,ro�! I„ 'yoW !!! h$ '.. ., � 11r�it� iy, �,. �r,G, , � ��➢ima�11��'Fi���G�14�T!6'r. �,�k S; � ... .` :6'rJi %� Arsenic* t f A I~ 1� r 1�' hirj'r?�'M1``�. `M r.;'; � �F � ir TF�l q'!pi$ T: ,}A,. tl !; ? (" ° * , ��. .�kFl� s,ra r 4 �. 4,0 7.5 or SB Mercury NA t+ 1, 'ia`r NA NA .ia b X S ,fA NA NA hsir M'' NA 610 0.1 Notes: See Table 2C TABLE 2C 9-12, 15-18 and 21-24 INCH ANALYTICAL RESULTS v p'F�• i m,a.,. r i k Y ','Xl !' a �a ^Ll, V't: v x�,-; jF,i"'Y 'i�ffi w f� 4.e. A Ib 11, � Mr r ' "h k'{Cev � w' fa; �c/!;➢,��r.�,t��fll�'1it��M t�� ,:. y���la�a • �:b i ' 2,�p'it.��Nh�i��' ��`f .�I -� . , . ,1E �5a�,'yti,"�[�*�,�g°�;��„��7��w� .�t .a ,4�9 n F�`,`Sf+i1�A,�¢.�� a,,�S,����,��{�a< �a�'i5 n�r t � ' ��.-' ly+>F � ��'' w1-.�xifRl 1?' ����t+'..'�!1 ���"zd:7,��'t!`L2r)f„Y`1:�C`.��'� S���r.ii2�'..�'����, ,`fir �,➢5r �a�,7 Ra1.(�3'4Y3�.4`�u,�'* MOOR Iffira ., :. bh, WV lc , uM �Ar.,, �� �71 KIM nik ��Vm Arsenic* 2.25 " 1.98 ND 2.31 2.45 2:03'` ND ND 4,0* . 7.5oYSB Mercury 0.036 0.040 0.022 0.087 1 0.039 0.031 1 0.024 ND, ND 610 0:1 Table Notes: ND=Not Detected; NA=Not Analyzed; NS=:No Standard; SB=Soil Background; Soil Background Values=Arsenic,3-12 mg/kg;Mercury,0.001-2 ug/kg. Bold/Shaded indicates the constituent exceeds the USEPA standards; Italics/Shaded-indicates the constituent exceeds the NYSDEC standards; Underlined indicates the constituent exceed the SCDHS guidance value for arsenic. *-SCDHS guidance value for Arsenic is 4 mg/kg. Page 6 of I I 4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES (QA/QC) Sampling protocol was conducted m accord USEPA accepted sam ling procedures for hazardous waste streams (Muriicipa Researcli: Laborator} 1980 SampIfn� and Salnphng' Procedures for Hazardous Material Waste Streams, USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio'.EPA- 600\280- o18) and ASTM Material. Sampling Procedures: All samples were collected by or under the - auspices of USEPA trained personnel havmg_completed the course Sampling of Hazardous Materials, offered by the Office of Emergency.and;Remedial Response. Separate QA/QC measures were imd�o plementeroeach of the instruments-pik -ii the_Sampling and Analysis Program Sampling rnsiime� etded a stainless stehand anger and sample - �1°s .s c` PX10T t0 aFRU'dl On�t11P+`?-517.��0C't pr(�1 _;ee� Samp'le 10�--'' y 6 311dd a13gPsr' waS" decontalmnated by v✓ashmgwith==ale rgen� ale nox�'hquinox) an © b watery LI, IL ti - riate - - distlre�`wate nnse.- All samples-vessel wereA-�1`�vel��—eerfied�d'e'conta� d-contamers-;. C Samples were placed into vessels consistent wlththe analytical parameters ;After acquisition, samples were preserved in the field. All containerized samples were refrigerated to 4° C during transport. A sample represents physical evidence, therefore, an essential part of liability reduction is the proper control of gathered evidence. To establish proper control, the following sample Cidentification and chain-of-custody procedures were followed. Samnle Identification - Sample identification was executed by use of a sample tag, logbook and manifest. Documentation provides the following C 1. Project Code 2. Sample Laboratory Number 3. Sample Preservation 4. Instrument Used for Source Soil Grabs C. 5. Composite Medium Used for Source Soil Grabs 6. Date Sample was Secured from Source Soil 7. Time Sample was Secured from Source Soil 8. Person Who Secured Sample from Source Soil Chain-of-Custody Procedures C Due to the evidential nature of samples,possession was traceable from the time the samples were collected until they were received by the testing laboratory. A sample was considered under fcustody if: `- It was in a person's possession, or It was in a person's view, after being in possession,or It was in a person's possession and they were to lock it up, or It is in a designated secure area. L L > Page 6 of to Vestldde Report When transferring custody,`.the individuals relinquishing and receiving signed, dated and noted the time of the Chain-of- Custody Form. Laboratory Custody Procedures • A designated sample custodian accepted custody of the shipped samples and verified that the information on the sample tags matched that on the Chain-of-Custody records. Pertinent information as to shipment, pick-up, courier, etc. was entered in the "remarks" section. The custodian then entered the sample tag data into a bound logbook which was arranged by project code and station number. The laboratory custodian used the sample tag number or assigned an uaique laboratory number to each sample tag and assured that all sampleswere transferred to the proper analyst or stored in the appropriate source area. The custodian distributed samples to the appropriate analysts. Laboratory personnel were responsible for the care and custody of samples from the time they were received until the sample was exhausted or returned to the custodian_ All identifying data sheets and laboratory records were retained as part of the permanent site record. Samples received by the laboratory were retained until after analysis and quality assurance checks were completed Page 7 of I1 5.0. - SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 3'S tJ3 _ This;investigation was completed in order to determine if certain pesticide related compounds were present in the soils of the subject property. A sampling and analysis program(SAP) was designed to determine the concentrations of pesticides and metals in the soil in accordance with guidance offered by SCDHS and NYSDOH. The SAP consisted of collection of discrete soil samples at depths of 6-3 and 3-6 inches on the property. Laboratory analysis of the soil samples was performed using analytical test methods consistent with expected parameters and SCDHS/NYSDOH guidance. The following presents an evaluation of the results of this uivesttgat�on� _ _ i lAtxatal�ofeaghtn1$)rsoit=samgls me (9hga lncatrnns werecolle cted omoow ,, . --.,�, � � - �s-an strafe�c ocaho�s t o�u li©u^4he r'perfy��Specrfically samples were collecterLfropn f©�cumpounds relate�to_o es;rade a "lreahan du t t�e ast and resent use of the`- - `' ` 2. Review of the analytical results for the 0-3 inch interval samples revealed that the five (5) samples selected to be analyzed for pesticides all contained elevated levels of pesticide compounds. However, none of the pesticide compounds detected were found to exceed there respective United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Soil Screening Levels SSLs or New York State Department of Environmental Protection (NYSDEC) Technical Administrative Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) 4046 recommended soil cleanup objectives. In addition, each of these five (5) samples were also analyzed for the presence of metals. All of the samples were found to contain elevated levels of several metals. Of these metals detected, only arsenic was found to exceed its corresponding SCDHS guidance value of 4 mg/kg in all of the samples analyzed. In addition, mercury was found to exceed its corresponding NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective of 0.1 mg/kg in three (3) of the nine (9) samples analyzed but was detected below its corresponding USEPA SSL of 610 mg/kg. With regard to r the four (4) 0-3 inch samples analyzed only for arsenic, all were found to contain elevated levels Lwhich exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. Based on the 0-3 inch sample results, all three (3) the 3-6 interval samples were analyzed for arsenic and three (3) of the samples were analyzed for meacury. Review of the 3-6 inch interval sample results revealed that arsenic exceeded the L SCDHS guidance value. With regard to mercury,it was also detected above its NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective in all three (3) of the 3-6 inch samples analyzed but L, was found to be below its USEPA SSL in each of these samples as well. 3. Based on the 3-6 inch sample results samples were collected from the 9-12, 15-18 and 21-24 inch intervals from the locations of PS-2, PS-5 and PS-9 to further evaluate the vertical extent of L arsenic and mercury contamination. Review of the analytical results detected the presence of mercury in seven(7) of the nine (9) samples collected but none were found to exceed the USEPA SSL or NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective for mercury. Arsenic was + detected in six (6) of the nine(9) samples collected and one (1) exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. L L_ LPage 8 of 11 Pesticide Report In summary, representative soils on the subject property were sampled and analyzed for the presence of pesticides and metals. Based on tlie laboratory results, elevated concentrations of arsenic and mercury were identified. As a result, it is recommended that a soil management plan be prepared to mitigate potential exposure to arsenic and mercury. Date of Comple 'on ry B c r, P.E. NELEO &POPE Page 9 of 11 REFERENCE New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), 1992, SamDlina Guidelines and Protocols Technology Background and Quality ontrol/ uali Assurance for NYSDEC Spill Response Program,NYSDEC, Albany,New York. NYSDEC, ; 199- _ Techmeal Admtmstiative Guidance Memorandum I3WR-94-4©46, Deterininahor<_ Of soil cleanupoblectives and cleanup levels, Division of Hazardous s _ ��---- '"" N�'SDO�1=g��;1e e�`datex�3r1�1'S, k4�b�from��,dwaz�PlQrn;-1�h�D; DlrectorBureau�f'Tox_ic � Substance Assessment to Frank Randall;Cluef,Iusp�cUon Services Bureau NI'SDOH. " L SCDHS, Procedures for Municipalities to Evaluate the Need for Soil Sampling and Soil L Management at Subdivisions or Other Construction Protects with Potentially Contaminated Soils. USF-PA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 1996, Publication 9355.4-23, Soil Screening Guidance User's Guide, Washington, D.C. C it I l� 1.- Page 10 of 11 Pesdcide Report APPENDICES _i Page 11 of 11 • - 1 APPENDIX A LONG ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. J LABORATORY DATA SHEETS �f ��V P�i VGi�fiS LC gg�y :d l4Fa F4Ai 3 4 �fe ND t Lf Hx i'1 0 LV MYIt-C iL IiSithSS" LA. ATCXIMS I mo. �.1`�EFat YF ? ( •"1 .}tSF � Ir v I.$a d'r1`Y rn MOW 1 cf 12 pages Goober 30, 2007 Nelson & Pow Erle Amesen 572 Well Whitman Road Melville, New YorR 11747 ate: f��ritsge t�tttchogue [year Mr. Arnesen; Enclosed please find tete Laboratory Analysis RepoO.(s) 'or samples receiver) oat October 24, 200T L rmg Island Analytical Laboratories analyzed the samples on October 25, 2007 for the following: GLlEI~lTID ANALYSIS PS-1 (01 3)-- EPA 80311- S£DH Metals PS-2 0" } EPA 8081, SCDH metals 3633 {I]"•3"} Total Arsenic-Analysis PS-4 {0"-a"} Total Arsenic Analysis PS-8(w-3-y EPA 84$3 SCDH Metals PS-6(0- Y) -, EPA 8081;,,SCDH Metals; PS-7 07-Y Total Arsenic Analysis P"8 UL I EPA $081 `$CDH Metals Total Arsenic Analysis Sarnp es rarelved at 3-4'C. Report revises dated November 5; 2007- If you have any Gue5tiart5 or require further intormation, piease Gall at your convemenco, Long.Island Analytical Laboratories'Inc is a NELAP accredded laboratory. All reported results meet the regulrsrnants of Ilre NEL.40 standards unless noted above. RepQrt shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the lab ratory. Lona Island Analytical Laboratories would like to thank .you for the oppartu ,M/ to be, of servM-- to you. Best Regards, Lang FsW d AnafAcal Laborafaries, Inc. lcf Colrri rr•*.Fe Holbrau ld�?>v "ro ,, -�1 2 of 12 pages - -- •. Client: Ne[aon & Pope Client 1D: Heritage @ Cutcttogue P5-1 D"-3 bate received: 10124W Laboratory ID: 1147358 Elate ext1 md: 10125117 lNafirlx Soil Qaf artaY zed_1Uf2*di17 Eta'M-1-1893t - y "'R' -'. 'rY,as� .F��xxu'-,'e�griaz�z.�#c! rs•. �g' •y�st �m -_ w'ms.-_+i:'y ..au�z�-fin.+ r�th'r.,:us<--,.�...�' 051 WN CbMPOUND CAS No MfSL u 1k F4 F�SUt.TS A--• IDnn C. _Bt tC 31 -$4-C 5 13gJlcg 1.-SHC 319857 5Ua 5 € Y .5• E1FiG 39863 5ugidg - l 9l9 {f irtd:atte} 58$9.9. 50 u <5 Chiord2ne 127E9 Ci3-5 15 a 4,4'--AE}D 72-54.8 5u k.- ---- _ -._ I l 72-55-9 5 uadk 141 j 4,4'-D 5 u 4,4'-DDT 50-2 R 175 C Dkhn_. 8f157-T", 5 u, 11F'. - >:ndosulian l 95 - 8•$ 5 u k4 7-40 } �ndosuffa ll l 3.925 r-B `� 5 aalka _ :'_5.4 €rrdosulfansulrata 1 1031-07-8 5eJ 72-20 8 5 ua+kq 6.70_ I �ndnn � c5 5ndrin aldefiyde 742,-93.4 5 u ik4 4;e �ohlor_ _ He tach3as 75-44-6 a tilde 1124 C_ 4 4'-Methcxy/ hlor 1 _ _ 7274.3.5 5 nark =5 I TDxa ene 5401 35 2 200 u rasa- X200 Endrin ReAOI)e 53494-70-5 5 ualka -- -- PADL M;nsmurn €Y7ecfitn �ITM. Calculated on a wet weight IMUS Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Dlr(3✓z0F l - f NG LAND _ ANALYTIC, I, r _ � �`1` � �.e Mc- [.[ll -1C Hii' ii sq l l tr it I 1 ' 1 i631l 4. 2 E. -1146 L "SC OOC,?QWJ AMACYIX-4t XK)fl Wa`E9tr° _ 3 c-f 12 pages Client: Nelson a Pope � Client ID! Heritage Cutcfiogv Date received. 101241{17 Laboratory ID, 1147358 Date analyzed: See Below 1 Matrix, Saii METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MDL. DATE RESULTS mgtkg (FLAG ANALYZE[ SILVER, Ag 1.65 m !k I 1fl125107 ARSENIC, As 1.65 _ 10/25107 5-87 BERYLLIUM, Be 1.65 0 itl/15f07 c1.6 CADMIUM, Od 1,110M ,kgt 10f25107 <1xio CHROMIUM, Cr 1,65 m 1 '1'0/25107 798 - COPPER, Cu 1:65 fn10/25107 - 5.68_ MERCURY Hcy 0.020 m /kq-1 10/25107 NICiGEL, Eli 1.65 m licq 3.46 LEAD, Pb m 1.65 mglicg 10/25107 � g�13 1.701. = Minimum DeWc[iur!Limit- Calculated Tarr a wet we:g'hi bu=i4 Performed by EPA Method 6olaB -Method: EPIA 7471A f. Michael Veraldi-Laboratorl Director E { MAA L IVC-�A LAB ATS$ ;, r, �n NT!r -- - — '�?1t7f�9'u`Z3�fG•��_"r�Do-3r-iCPrB .'�/-231Q:i Ga I_2F:m*3il IA 4 of 12 Pages G(le IT: Nelson 8 Pope Client ID.- Heritage @ Cutchcgue `P5-2 4"-3 - _ Latrorate_ . Id 1147359 dafe received; 14f�4f�7 dale extra of ed 10125107 Matrix,_ Sait_ at anal'"Yetf`151137. . ELAF 064. 1 - COMPOUND CAS No.. . IyES� F2E^�ULTS a JK = Fla- " $09=t5G=2 5 u It [dEm { 5 u�1ka 399.54-6 a-F3fFL: _ 2SHG 1 313-85 S- SHG 319 86-$ I 5 ukg .5 v• €sHGJLindanei- 58 08-e 5 ugNg _ Ghlordarne 12789=03:6 to u k 15 - L 4,4'- DDD 9 72 54-B { 5 UW. , _ 17,2 4.6_D©E 72=55"5 i Du 1k f 424 A. -LILT `rii 23 "ak 34 . Dieldrin c5 { EndosUlfian I 959-9$4q. t 5 u Endesulfan H 33212-65-9 5 Ik EradosutEan sulfate ttY39 47-8 5 u' 3 _ 144 Endrin 72-2" a jn7kq 12.1 -.Endrin Stdeh de 7421-9_34 ll He -.achiar- - - - 75-44-8 5 13D �5 Heptachlor eooxidE 1024-57-3 u A�'-Cdetnosvchkri r2-43-5 5 u�fk x2GG TQxavhn@ c3GG1-35-2 200 u rka Endrin ketbr e 53494.70-5 1 5 ug2t4j, '5 MDL = IAN m Detection Lan t Galr_uu3ted 9n a we. vt ge-19ist t}asis Michael Veraldi-Labaratcry t)4rectdr L KAI ..i.- s> LABMATORMS INC. - 4 Emal! Ir' I. "•tiFi`:�"c�X55.4di6.tYPrl.`k!tCtifft�+H3 5'3t�e7'" I Clielit: Nelson & Pope i Gk�nt ID: Henta3e @ Ccatclrogue Date received- 10124/07 ; L aborata ID: 1147359 Date analyzed: See Belot=. � ! ivlatnx- Soil METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MDL [SATE RESULTS rnglkg FLAG ANALYZED SILVER Ao 1.6x5 mgikg 10i25107 <1.65 ARS _ENtfltw, As !k 7.£5 m !' 10125107 12.0 r BE€2YLLIW.41 Be1.65 m_A 10125107 =7.65 ; Cfit€)Iv9I[JM4, Cd . 1. 0 MgLkg 10125/07 <1.00 CHROMIUM, Cr 9.66 mq*q 10/25/07 6.42 COPPER. Cu E7.65 m Ik 14,25107 9,1+ ;MER Cil Y H 0,020 mg/kq mg/k1 1012510' 45.96 s A - EUIC!£EI . t3a.. 7,65 m !k 70125.107 2.70 W. \� DAIS, Pb_ _ _ 1,65 irrglkg 70126107 Det = ?25 r.�1C}t. PAlnranuirt t�tiUr7 LuY7ti. CalCuiazerl'cifl a vt�@vr`igftt 6esis Prrfcm-L;W by EPA rutethod 60-10B 4AMhad' EPA 7471. - , ' t� Michael Veraldi-Laborataiy DreclGr UoNa JIM 5Sj WMT W_ 'TaKCAWZWS�hi.F:LVWCn !–f6'7fi,Eti n—AC P 2.400 - Fa i_C,31 ? r+:-,C, -mi L _IY-L�!irl , 6 of 12 pages Client: f4e[son & POPe cliQnt ID. Heritage @ Cutc Ogrue ate received" 14t 4n37 Caborata :Ip: 'i 1473&2 . ©a#e extracted 1 1251ti7 IJfatrik. Snit gEt�ti # 11693 k C€5t1ApC7UNCs u lk _- . F14 'k u - BHC i 319-84-6 5 u tkg _ ti$ e9{C 319-86-7 5 ugtk9 C 31s� 56 8 5Uglkq r5 - BHC (Lindane) _ 58 591 s 5 ugikp Chlordane 12789-03a6 [ 15 u-rk 415 P 4.4'--QDQ 72-5A'$ s s u 1k _ 25.4 k 4,4'-DOE 72-5S.g { 5 ucuk 399 4 4".•E>fYr 50-22-3 15 u tk 749 1 Dieldralx&571 5u 7kq 18 ( ' �rtdQ�vti2n f 3598-R_. s varka I =5 @ndosulEan li 33212 tis-9 ! 5 ucV . 1 40.6 3 Endasratfan sulfate 1{ 31-07-€i 5 Wcjkc 422 Endrlat 72-20-8 9 5 u i �TEnd.rinakieh• -. _,,, 7A21-?34 5 l&,q `5 j He tahlor 78'44-6 L r- #fe 5achfor epoxide 1224-57-3 _._ .c 5 e d 4'-Mi-_2hoxvr h4� 2- resxaohene $L�01 35 2 200 u Ikq <200 Endain ketone 53494-70-5 5 u- Tk <5 ^� MOL R Minimum D2tecbDn Limit CalcutaWd on a wet W D ghl bas ims Whael Varaidi•Laboratoq 0 recto: l MAND L t.AATIOS 1U =olio L),we • al i .k { - ti 'h — •Tuh3mrc't+t'i,iWA Ui;GS ttk'F£iWiA , F hnl R j .j ' -172-33.Cnj Fax fO3 i 4 2-i� -R) 'r o ',2 page" Client: Nelson & ;pope 01-Ent Iia: l.Mage @ Cuteh©gue t (I5S-5Or_3„}s da#e ece t i0t2:rY17 i t_abraratary ID: 11=+_7362 — - Date analgcl:"see Eelo�v _ Matrix: Soil METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MDL DATE RESULTS mgfkg FLAG ANALYZED StLLI€R, Aa 1.65 in Jkq ” 101'25/07 1.65 ARSEN1G„ As 1.65 mglk: 10x107 13:6 BERYLLIUM, Be 1,65 m 11312510E - s1,65 CADMIUM, Cd 1.00 m !-q 10125107 r1.00 CHROMIUM, Cr _ 1_.65 m 1(1125107 8.23 COPPER- Cu1.61;are k 10126107 1215 I' MERCURY, Hq* 1 4..02) mgllq 1012,5107 f_ 13,12 NICKEL, Ni 1.65 rra fk IWx107 -- 3.30 v LEAD, Pb k_j_-65 mg 1U125107 I_ 17,1 MILL --mmmurr, Data+ tian L A Galcutated on a viA;veeight basis. Peafwrned by EPA Method 60 tOR .methtod: ftPA 7471A - - michael Veraldi--Laboratory DlrectuT y AHW i`t AL tic - = C _T, 3 Je t3it'%A3dht FfGd'e sL'Ci+'r'(NFS TV€'x`.Y- pFPG� t.._1 2 Ccl a, 8 90- Client ILS: Hebtagc Gutchogue 1 chtnt. Nelson & POPe [PS-8 c"-3" -_ L�bt Drari t.Q. 1' 47363 . ' 3�}t`24;Of. � _ - -- [J to�xtr cted 10,/25}47 111 tnx Sal E aieana' 1�f2�L47 5Y �F" -1 y 5. CDNI#'E?LINTI CAS N13; " RatJLTs u cx- HC 310-8A-6 '& BHC ag&s �3 _ 3'34 #3£L _ 5 ugtkg �5 _ v- El HO{t ira f. t e k 5$-89-9 Y 5 fhloMen IME-1-o3-6 _ 95 a72-Z4-8 5 u _ 923 4,4'- D6D _ r - - - 345 _ _i. '-DGE 72 55=9 P 5 u k So_?9=3 5 at�k 449 4 4'-DoT ; Dieldr" 60-5(1-1: a "gP�Cc3 I Er -- sulfan I 959-98-8 5 Ualk I `$ EndDsullart]i 33�1� 5F-�3 5 iiQkA 11 ri sulfate ID31 W-9 5 uQ+kg I 94.5 I f rsdo&utN L Enr3ein _ G I Er1P�in atdets 6e 7421-Ia3-4 - Her' -a Ior 7%'-44-B a ura 1 y l tec-Mor a pxide 902' 57-3 5 ur Fx eE C d 4'4Aeth!oxVchio 43 5 lx T- - hene 3001-35-2 200 u rk t20C Endri�r keWm-e 534�J4`7o E u E rrW1 DL = 1 imknurn Detection U-mit �alrutafea on a Wal we gM basis L f ZZ s/ - Michaet Veraldi-La'ooratory Director L- LONG ESLAND L Fas�a*tATOR S C. r4 i ! =' .. L,r s yP4''2a`✓, -S.iffw=f7NYi� €c i'+c7x5 !f' Prt!i•_' .'.31 X400 F ]x ., . 9 of 12 pages [ Ghent: PI Escrt Pzrpe Client ID. Heritage @ Cutcttague L!?rte received; 1V24107 LabaraterY l[ ; 1 I47S63 i7a}e enal zed: See Below Matrix Sail METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MDL DATE RESULTS mgtkg FLAG ANALYZED SILVER Ag 1 .65 mqfkq 10/25167 ;- ARSENIC, As �M 1.65 m 1k- 101-5107 17 BERYLLIUM. Be . 1.65 m Ik 10125107 j <1.65 �. CADMIUM, Cd , { 1.0 m Ik 10125107 <1 00 CHROMIUM,-Cr 1 .65 m Ik 10125W07 7,58 COPPER, Cu 1 .65 mqlkci 10125107 I 8,59_ MERCURY, ilt�`;- [3.92C1m a'k 10125107 0.07 NICKEL, tai 1.65m Iko 1=5107 3.79 LEAD, Pb 1 .65 m Ik 1Q25/07 I2 1 '• rADL = Wrijmum Detec#inn Limit. Cab--LLIW�!i or.a wet weight basis [='e rmed by EPA M4et'Yinr6 60100 rQjeff3cd EPA 74?!A - - Michael Veraldi-Lavncatory Diredor ` ISLAND ABOATOW-0 C- _ 1`G CoAw-ea r7 p t- • -rrl rrrk: h•!= Ye)�K t1 A T - "`-'iSC?PCik4t�lrit/'i!YiE_`:YLi•21HS i�:-rS: ��t. s.�e (F i7i ".. l-"rl,t �,� i E.�1m 1AL Client: Nelson 8,P©P'= Client ID: Herdage Cvtchogue (PS-81a -31 a Laboratory ID: 11 7:36 Date F eiveli: i0J24J } aoc�r� Jr ru_ iterao . Qate e�chacted. 1fj1217 _hllrix_ Steil CQ �€SUND EA5 i+lis: M�3L WL-T—& u hi __ Fla' l ps�ta,r, - n- BHC 319$ s 8 u lira $ - BHC 310-tis-7 5 uglkg _ C 319=86-8 `5 ugtkg I �� allC Ii nda x) 58 B$ J 5 ugtkg i5 Cnlordone I 12789.113-6 I 15 uglk <15 72-54-B 5R 5 uglk 14.6 - 4.4'-DDE '2-55.4 t 5 u N _ 326_ _ 1 _ -DDT 50-23-5 a u ik ( 325 3 Oieldrn (I Endosutian 1 959-58-8 I 5 ugrk Endasultan11 33212.65-2_ _ 5U'tkq I 19.4 1 Erasuiiar Sralfate. 1i}34-47-8 I 5uglkq I 140 Endrin 208 5 uq E i [ Endrin akleh de 7421-83 He tach3or 70 4?•8 C Herta hlor evoxide t 021-57-� _ o ugtkg ; SG I �, '-bA t13nz ciitar r2�3 5 � 6'uglk : l'oza tt5rte - -. B-001.35-2 i wu a +k I .'240 I _ Endrin ketcneYOn 5 49d-70-8 a 5 ua�k __I- Caicula d on a wet weight hast' �RDL = t�iinrrnum Da" ci Limir g C Cr �r� i�i@•� p 1aj MiettaEi VieraW!-LaboraWry DiMcWr L_ ANALYTICAL I�f It_A.'J`4fRATORKS NC- 1—., Lid, ri D5 Iyt_ Hot rook QFiw "i rk 1 - L_ iLrri?9R H€AE#f?35CRi StYt n4 i4 �T` h it i;631l ` +.dt.It 3 i li 477 E r. ?.i I of 12 PaQes Clunk. Nelson -&-Pope Ciie t 10. Hert:age @`:utchdgue Date resp ued_ I ar2410j Laborato IO 1147365 2lovC e an d: See B ; Matr-� Soil ME ES ANALYSIS` PARAMETER PAUL DATE RESULTS mgfkg FLAG ANALYZED SILVER, A 1.65 Mglkg 1 1t7725f{77 e9.65 ARSENIC, As 1.65 m Jkg 10125107 1(1.3 BERYLLIUMi Be 1.65 m lkg j 10125107 1,65 - CADMIUM, Cd 1.00 mgAg 10125107 � --1.00 CHROMIUM, Cr 1,65 mg*- j 10125107 _7,96 COPPER�Cu e. 1,65 ingAg 1 10/25107 10.5 ME l' MERCURY, !� (3.L'20 10 mttlk l .LA10'r 0.3'I — P NICKEL Ni 1 65 rsg k 94125107 3-44 LEF1D, Pb 1 65 mcgAg 10125107 11.8 f 1,41)L=miniRIIdrn Cttectir)n t_I na, Calr- faled on a vle5 vireg,nt b&is Perfor"d by PPA Method 6010$ -Method: EPN i471A Ys� a r Michael Veraldi-Laboratoq Director LONG- MOM ALM . BORATE fit, << r ljr• �JFivr H'v s ?;an t:;: i+ 'few=.©P8`ikR'i_4RAlYiF..-umvTrowz;TM-V- �l�._--z.: -- 12 of 12 pages =� Client: C li IsprF &Pope - Client 9D: Henta e DtFtchs� >se Dale received: 101241,07-__, LaboTate- ID See Below DMe extracted: M25167 Mal lx: Soil s Clate arF i _ed: 1 W5107 _ ,E #P#: 11693 } "Z`4` ^� �* iags.�t� 3, ^'-,n '. •.�' u . Ub irf-> n, � ultrs� ► ra „ 1 _4Z f-j:73f3 P 6 �# �-- 1147364 5 , 1147366 PS-9 t -3.1 1.6�TrFglit9 - - - 13.E I NARL= MinknUrn Reporting Limit Calculated on a wet weigtiF basis CPeriotrn$d by `WV 846 hietitod 60198 Aid f Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director L L C L L- fI LONG . .1`TiL + sFrte°.- tip Cni .! G ? ri, �. -. r��37 i=Uli • Fax "b'1 Vr�= i�.� !_maii I-I3:.�. :{ �lin:..crr 'T&"�z'Srle 4LrL A-WAlfn-:AL L`19L1'Fe lffS fit'1�_' F't ]I �_ ,_ _ ISLAND CTDOH#PH-0284 ANALYTICAL AiHA#164456 LABORATORIES INC. WDEP#NY012 PAOEP#68-2943 "MMORWWS ANALYACAL SouTN7MS 70DAY- j 1 of 3 pages October 31,2007 Nelson & Pope Eric ArnesenNOV 1 2007 572 Wait Whitman Roada g� Melville, New York 11747 Ref Heritage:'° Dear Mr. Arnesen: _ Enclosed please find the Laboratory Analysis Report(s) for sample(s) received on October 30, 2007. Long- Island Analytical Laboratories analyzed the samples on October 31, 2007 for the following: CLIENT ID ANALYSIS (- PS-1 {3"-6"1- Total Arsenic Analysis PS-2 J3"-6") Total Arsenic and Mercury Analysis PS-3 3"-6"j Total Arsenic Analysis PS-4 3'-6" Total Arsenic Anal'sis PS-5 (3--6"1 Total Arsenic and Mercury Analysis PS-6 3"-6" Total Arsenic Analysis PS-7 3"-6" Total Arsenic Analysis PS-8 3"-6" Total Arsenic and Mercury Analysis PS-9 '-6" Total Arsenic Analysis Samples received at 3.40C. If you have any questions or require further information, please call at your convenience. Long Island Analytical Laboratories Inc. is a NELAP accredited laboratory. All reported results meet the requirements of the NELAP standards unless noted above. Report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Long Island Analytical Laboratories would like to thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. Best Regards, Long island Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 110 Colin Drive • Holbrook, New York 11741 ' Phone (631 ) 472-3400 Fax (631 ) 472-85- 0-5 Email: L1AL@lialinc_corn 2 of 3-pages �- Client: Nelson & Poe Client ID: Heritage Date received: 10%30/07. Laborato ID: 1147602-1147610 Date extracted: 10/31/07 Matrix: Soil Date analyzed: 10/31/07 FLAP-#: 11693 -TQT L-�ARS NIG ANALYSIS x - 1'147603' PS-2 3"=6" 1.65-m /k 17:5 1147604- PS-3 3"-6" 1 .65 m"/k 3:31 1147605 PS-4 ff'-61 14.0 1147606 PS-5 (3"-6"1 mg/kg 16.1 1147607 PS-6 3"-6" 1.65 m /k 17.5 ~ 1147608 PS-7 3"-6" 1.65 m /k 11.5 C 1147609 PS-8 13"-6"1 1 1 .65 m A 11.4 1147610 PS-9 {3"-6") 1.65 m /kg 16A MRL = Minimum Reporting Limit Calculated,on a wet weight basis r Performed by SW-646 Method 60108 Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director I �_. LONG !BLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORES INC 110 Colin Drive • ht ;Iorook New York 11741 ^ro)WoRsowsANaernCALSMUTIMSloner^ Phone (631) 472-3400 Fax (631) 472-8505 Email LIAL@lialinc.com 3 of 3 pages LClient: Nelson & Pope Client ID: Heritage Date received: 10/30/07 Laborato ID: See Below Date extracted: 10/31/07 Matrix: Soil Date analyzed: 10/31/07 FLAP #: 11693 TOTAL MERCURY ANALYSIS Lab ID # Client ID MDL Results mq/kq m /kFLAG 1147603 PS-2 3"-6" 0.020 m /k 0.14 1147606 PS,-S 3",6" 0.020 mgfkg mg/kg0.15 1147609 I PS-8 {3"-6") 0.020 mg/kg 0.12 MDL- = Minimum Detection Limit. Calculated on a wet weight basis SW-846 7471A r' Michael Vera ldi-Laboratory Director LONG ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INS'. 110 Colin Drive - Holbrook, New York 11741 70MORkOftANALMC LSMUTIOMs70onr' Phone (631) 472-3400 • Fax (631) 472-8505 • Email: LIAL@Hi Tm ccom f .oil's tri 23 NJ4EFs N'E 6l2 4A�Faria�ys�e_�.� eFTOPRES W.C. F W YISAdd4llTr ;t$wrmv- 1 of 3 pages Nov-amber 14, 2007 f�e[son �?ope 8,'+Jo�rf3is Errc Arnesere - 57 LM1falt:Jl33trnarc P�Oad - Dear MT. €Trtesen: Enclosed please find the Laboratory .Analysis Report(s) for sample(s) received on L November 12, 2007. Long Island Analytical Laboratories analyzed the samples on November 13. n07 for the follotiv ng L RB- NT Ip ANALYSIS 9-12 Total Arsenic & Memur AnaE sis t 15-18 Total Arsenic & MercuryAna' sis L 21-2A Total Arsenic & MercuryAnal ,is 9-12 Total Arsenic& Mercury Anal psis 15-15 Total Arsenic & Ivlercu -Analvscs 21-24 TotalArsenic&Mercu�Analysis 9-12 Total Arsenic & Mlercu ,Ana, sis 15-18 Total Arsenic & Mercu Arca rsis 21-24 1 Total Arse-'- & Mercu Any iS arnples received at 2°C, If you have any questions or require further information, please call at your convenience. Long Island Analytical Laboratories Inc. is a NELAP accredited laboratory. [ All reported results meet the requirements of the NELAP standards uni"s noted above- Report shah not be reprodured except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Lang Island Analytical Labora.ories would ftl e to thank you fvr the opportunity to be of service to you. CBlast Regards. (r Lang Island Analytical Laboratrirras, Inc. - - tj -1 I n Drlt 6 �. Phone 1P3' . 47 344O tea': o—'31 i .t � 8---G5 ri21��1: LIAI. 141,3 t1 lC.Cu(!'« r s o,z paw Client: Nelson Eope Client 10: Herita e :�3t,ho ue Date received: 11PM7- Laboratory IB, 1148350-11148358 Late extracted: 11113197 I AA�f 1x; 5oi1 Date analyzed: 91 113107 ELAF * 11693 TOTAL ARSENIC ANALYSIS Lab 11:.1 Client IIS MRL Results mg*g Fla 1148354 B-2 9-12 1.65 m !g kg k 2.25 1148351 B-2 1518 5 rn 1!c s 1.98 j 1148352 B-2 21-24 <1-6,9 1 1148353 B�549-1.2 1.65 mog . 10.3 ' 1148354 8-5 1518 1.65 m rK 2.31 1148355 t 8.-5 21-24 1.65 nag/kq , 2-45 - 1141355 B-9 9-12 1.05 m 1k ;, - 2,03. - 1 1148357 B-9 1Z-; 18 I 1.65 m 1kq -<9.fi 1948358 B-9 21.24 1 1 C5 rngfkg, 1 <1,65 FARL=Minimum Repurting Limit Ca&culated an a,wM w0ght btj-M5 Perfcvrmed by SW-cW Methad 601 G13 ol 3 i= P e rt Michael Verald€Lanoratory Dire or L3tL4rtepY{Sk#I�:YP.-4�€GLU""Y�X .fPe,1-•..•. Fr[1 t'.�, lam-1 -1 �'i -(7.1 -• F3. ( �?7 ` 1 s- c,; 'ri a'•-. IISl. - — 3 of 3 has ' Clients Nelson pope _client W; Narita e Cutcho ue f 9Rte received-1 1112-107 .LaGorato ID: Bee.BQtow I)ate extacfa¢: f 11131€37 Matrix: Soil mate ansl e0: 11I13107 EI -P 11593 � Lab I'D# Cii�ent tD MDL Resu4t�-rn`��.,_ Fla J 9148350 B-2 9-12 0.020, Xcl 0-036 1148351 4 B-2 15 18 0.020 0.040 i 9143352 B-2 21-24 ().020 0-022 114 53 B-5 9-12 _ (?.020 m Jicv 03:087 1148354 8-5 15=1ti ©.020 rn 1k s 0.039 1148355 B-521-24 itO.020 20 rn Ilk ° 0,031 Am B-9 9-12 m ik 0.024 r t3'9" $ j20ttiglk X0.02 j 13-9 21-24 ( 0.020 mg/kg X0,92 M UeISCti0n LiM't Caiculated on a vwt weigh',basis CSVV-fl4B 7471A L Ml�ha0-1'Veraidi-Laboratory ®iractor I L it L LONG r isLAND ANALYTICAL LASORATOMS 1C, Cc Ilii L Asti . Hr LL ?C k:AM1C�r ? 47 . 041 Fa'ld 7, - Ta i f IpN�_ Sd 4b14 yL 113 c�Djj�l C!riM,r, ° Hullrc" 4C, rd4' 1`a71t 11741 Phr�l3'e (631) 472-3400 - Fax (631) 7 8545 -EnT&IL LIAL@BldliR 0In Y.,4M9CtiYtr�7Xn'&1ff�Wo.. _._ ..�. -. .,....:_..._. - a CHAIN OF CUSTODY REQUEST FOR ALYSIS DC3C11MENT s.awe4 kn�sacnu,runei ons ru+e e,+a7 al eeueo _,IEN31VF�3.rrlAEaDFi e'�5 � � CONTACT �M,�u,,l. ' LAC1nPATCIRY CHAIN ! J faC) �/��y ry Fllar,lE: 'F i I_ �IJ'SlV IR,C,. � A1 G �` 9 8 rw��M, 4: —� "—`` 4f gnome duneiwnlxrl nxre nwe` uavn e5aurtine�"s AX 7'," '�,� i J . •,aos �'.,: III�� GAiC71c�1,7 t Cl AtTldbl -• -- --�-� - - "-'�""" r' TERStM 55��h'lf1PTYiGhIS V+;vai'.c ai VaiOU.,+in'ilr Ill+m'INrl7 il,iJ., iul.,lv�a�ng htimca a...n:aa l�' 01`x, [� WE& LiLI�GFtlAT,'JFOH A,IATR'IX TYPE •• Pprs_ N Pk 3AIRPL.E Y WJN6TS PPAI LOCATION q, c�,' ' ' i%.. l / I �coucaltH:rs YY�.vII,4W:��krvlJre.+:fl5 �* ��........,....�......`.r.s.� _..�... � s L � - — q r. a. La Hi 14. LL- RIATRIX'..S�SOIL:SL=SLUI']0 9=Lll ill)bLi;O1At.DF,INI0NG 7:N.ATERI fi-iil OENFI:1 R.'TRUC.11,10N= %-+A'IPd;'b"J 'PIPE,FN=tsh Ydl�i HY-P$;B'P.4=LIllLI p;M7�"G'RLTL, xxJCRIJAL 0 STAT TAPE, i f Eff PFIES iIC'F HC.L H2Cs 7q, P4-40H,NA2Sjp] l d NG.'L;:*WS1i1D'E� L �SNA7UNLI WT 34)ia,�r PFlIh1TEDNrfdE RECEIVEDRYSRt UF-C) DATE PPL'ITEDNAME 7Lr f Al DATE v k' ' k' aT.ONANr{LIRIj L� PI11 T<7 MuModV1y. ,.T.i.-r_;IINIFUNAE TIME � G>r MARV -LAE i PINK ;ARIPLE CUSTOu'�AN i GGMf NPOD- rXr r' CYGH rLA6�G ii�� LJSE'F`AP hJ'fl 12n AIHA,+ tmd56 GTOHd a p���y�p s�4�sr. rts73 LoNG isiLANM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. DATA REPORTING FLAGS For repoTbrig resuEts, ttte.fr t4erwigtg al lags are rased. . ix -� a �.,,�p I � EI ' ���`3a ®!�L' ��� -'♦b4T9L`sw':t'"..�" '"�'"' `�."'a`��P�'-cl.€ �� tES first tuis� tectlorlIrtiit t e r{w3c�taor ampfu raterFe[efies +�s•'M" rt�riT4T][I'�d,�9 �FTrI E{��lJt'-.t6 r 61�$1'� e-Compoupd 3tt er n F Mtliiami rrr d't Ctl@r3 l,rriit raasari Ctrs to insiroii lent sarriple voli�rne -' Sprrrpl reogN€ rn inrrect crantaines H: Sample not preserved, corrected upon receipt L dilution Water does not meet QC Criteria J: Fs:Vmated concentration, exceeds calibration range K:Target compound found in blank L subcontractor FLAP #11398 M: Subcontractor ELAP#10320 N: Subconlnactor NVLAP #102047.0 O: Subcontractor ANA#103005 F &ubcontradar A2tA2004-01 Q: Subcontractor FLAP#11026 R; Subcontractor ELAP #10155 S: S-ubcorrtractcr ELAP#11501 T: Subcontractor CTC u: subcontractor EiAF i#11685 V:QG affected by matrix W: SiAbcontractor S=LAP#10248 �_. X: CW, does not meet aomptance criteria Y: Sample container received with head spar,-- Z- paceZ- inwAvient sample volume received HA prelimirzar} results, cannot be used for regulatory purposes- B8 Spike recovery does root meet QG criteria due to high target concmnl. ratinn CC: ©ate reported belov: the lower limit of quantitation and should be considered to have an increased quantitative unceTiati3ty. DII: Sampling information not supplied andlor sample not taken by qualified technidan, thsrefore.varifiiabirity of the report is iirnited to results only REport cannot be used for regulatory purposes, �._ EZ, Subcontractor ELAP ' #11777 FF. 13rtable to verify that tine wipe samples submitted coriform to ASTM. E1792 or specs 4cafions issued by the EPA. I_ _. 1` ;girl tri F Fl-iln LEl rt 1'a 0ru K:31 r'r,one fi s 34}i_ 2) I .�?1 Appendix E-2 Soil Managcmen[ Plan Nelson &Pope July 23, 2008 • • THE IIERITAGE (a—,, CETCHOGUE Cutchogue, New York SOIL MANAGEIAlEN'f PLAN Prepm-ed for Heritage @ Cutchogue, LLC 1721-D North Ocean Avenue Medford,New York 1 1763 Prepm-ed bi Nelson &Pope, LLP 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11741 Contact: Gary Becker, Y.E. Date. July 23,2008 1.0 INTRODUCTION Nelson & Pope. LLP (N&P) has been contracted to prepare a Soil !Management Plan (SMP) for The Heritage (a, Cutchogue. This Plan is intended to provide mitigation procedures related to the elevated levels of arsenic and mercury detected as a result of sampling activities conducted by NP&V and contained in a Pesticide Report dated November 8, 2007. A copy of the Pesticide Report is included as Attachment A. This Plan provides the project objectives, background identifying the elements to be addressed with regard to the subject site, and outlines the soil management techniques to be used to mitigate potential health concerns associated with past site use. The guidance documents relating to pesticide sampling and soil management as issued by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) and dated February 2006 are included as Attachment B. This plan conforms to the standard operating procedures for soil management as determined by SCDHS. Upon satisfactory review of the Soil Management Plan, it is requested that the Town of Southold issue a letter approving the plan for implementation, stating that the proposed plan adequately meets the objectives of soil management to mitigate potential concerns with regard to detected soil chemical concentrations present on the land, due to past site use for agricultural purposes. The subject property consists of a 46.16 acre parcel of fallow farm field and wooded land located in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York. The subject property is located at the northwest comer of Griffing Street and School House Lane, approximately 1,079 feet north of Main Road, Cutchogue. The parcel is more specifically identified as SCTM No. 1000-102-1-33.3. The site is proposed to be developed as a Planned 55+ Active Adult Community consisting of 139 detached and attached dwellings, 14 of which will be set aside in perpetuity as affordable. The units, ranging from ±1,135 square feet (SF) to 12,647 SF, are comprised of 111 single family detached units. 14 attached single family duplex units and 14 attached multifamily units which iN ill be offered as affordable. • The Heritage @ Cutchogue 2.0 BACKGROUND AND PROJECT OBJECTIVES 40 Pest control is a typical part of agricultural use, and chemical application by licensed applicators using prescribed treatments in accordance with manufacturers instructions, can lead to residual concentrations of certain chemicals in on-site soils. Tlns practice has been used extensively throughout Long Island. As farm sites are contemplated for alternative uses, it is important to ensure that health precautions are observed. Applied chemical products degrade in soil and change over time to varying degrees. Breakdown components can be evaluated in terms of mobility and health implications. Generally, such chemicals are not easily liberated or mobilized such that groundwater impacts do not occur, particularly in areas with greater depth to groundwater and the type of chemicals used are bound in the soil. This is evident in reviewing groundwater data in the region occupied by the subject site where historical use of land from farming is extensive, however, there are relatively few incidents of elevated pesticide concentrations detected in groundwater. According to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) report titled Water Quality Monitoring Program to Detect Pesticides Contamination in Groundwaters of Nassau and Suffolk Counties, only 2.0% of the wells tested in the five (5) Towns in Western Suffolk exceed the pesticide related drinking water maximum contaminated levels (MCL). A notable exception was the use of the aldicarb chemical, Temik (applied for the control of the Colorado Potato Beetle on east end potato fields in the 1970's), which has had widespread groundwater contamination implications on the east end of Long Island where depth to groundwater is shallow, and the degradation of this chemical in the Long Island environment . was not well understood prior to application. The area of the subject site however, has a greater depth to groundwater in farmed areas, is well-served by controlled and monitored public water supply, and was not subject to extensive use of Temik. Therefore, the concern with regard to agricultural chemicals on the subject site is human exposure and resulting health implications. The primary concern with regard to human exposure involves children playing in soil, and actually ingesting soil. Health based soil concentrations are generally established based on assumptions regarding the amount of soil a child may ingest over a period of time. Casual exposure during excavation, grading and landscaping activities is not a concern, as adult age workers are not susceptible to ingestion. In addition, there is no significant concern with regard to short term intermittent airborne release as occurrence is infrequent (dry weather only) and mixing of soils occurs during grading. As a result, soil management is the accepted practice for managing such lands in consideration of new land use options. The following sections provide an understanding of the concentration of residual chemicals in soil on the subject site, and the horizontal and vertical distribution of chemical derivatives, such that an appropriate Soil Management Plan can be provided in consideration of the specific site design and use. • Page 2 The Heritage Culchogne 3.0 SrrE BACKGROUND Historic aerial photographs were reviewed in order to determine if any prior uses occupied the subject property. This review rev-ealcd that the subject property and much of the surrounding area consisted of farmland. It is unknown what chemicals were formerly applied to the property. Soil sampling on the subject property was conducted by NP8 V and is reported in the following document; which is provided as Attachment A: a Pesticide Report; 'Ihe Hneritage �n Cutcho�ue, November ember _, 20 A total of eighteen (1S) soil samples were collected from nine (9) sampling Locations situated throughout the property. Specifically, soil samples were collected from depths of 0-3 and 3-6 inches at each of the nine (9) sampling locations. Due to the past use of a majority of the property for agricultural purposes, the samples collected from five (5) locations were analyzed for the presence of pesticides and metals and the samples collected from the remaining four (4) locations were analyzed for arsenic which is a common constituent associated with pesticides. Initially. only the samples from the 0-3 inch intervals were analyzed. If any detected compounds within each individual sample were found to exceed their respective regulatory guidance values only then was the associated 3-6 inch interval sample analyzed. Review of the analytical results revealed the presence of elevated levels of arsenic and mercury which exceeded their respective regulatory agency guidance values across the subject property. As a result the 3-6 inch interval samples were analyzed for the presence of arsenic and mercury only and the analytical results revealed elevated concentrations of both constituents. In order to identify the depth to which arsenic and mercury were present, soil samples were collected from the three (3) of the previous sampling locations which exhibited the highest concentrations. The sampling scheme employed was consistent with guidance available from SCDHS as referenced herein. Review of the analytical results for the 0-3 inch interval samples revealed that the five (5) samples selected to be analyzed for pesticides all contained elevated levels of pesticide compounds. However, none of the pesticide compounds detected were found to exceed there respective United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) or New York State Department of Enviromnental Protection (NYSDEC) Technical Administrative Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) 4046 recommended soil cleanup objectives. In addition, each of these five (5) samples were also analyzed for the presence of metals. All of the samples were found to contain elevated levels of several metals. Of these metals detected, only arsenic was found to exceed its corresponding SCDHS guidance value of 4 mg/kg in all of the samples analyzed. In addition, mercury was found to exceed its corresponding NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective of 0.1 mg/kg in three (3) of the nine (9) samples analyzed but was detected below its corresponding USEPA SSL of 610 mg/kg. With regard to the four (4) 0-3 inch samples analyzed only for arsenic, all were found to contain elevated levels which exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. Based on the 0-3 inch sample results, the 3-6 interval samples from each of the locations were analyzed for only those constituents which exceeded their respective guidance values. Review of the 3- 6 inch interval sample results revealed that arsenic exceeded the SCDHS guidance value in Page 3 The heritage @ Cutchogue all of the samples analyzed. With regard to mercury, it was found to be detected above its NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective in three (3) of the 3-6 inch samples analyzed and was also found to be below its USEPA SSL in each of these samples as well. Based on the 3-6 inch sample results samples were collected from the 9-12, 15-18 and 21-24 inch intervals from the locations of PS-2, PS-5 and PS-9 to further evaluate the vertical extent of arsenic and mercury contamination. Review of the analytical results detected the presence of mercury in seven (7) of the nine (9) samples collected but none were found to exceed the USEPA SSL or NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective for mercury. Arsenic was detected in six (6) of the nine (9) samples collected and only one (1) exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. Figure 1 illustrates sampling locations and Attachment A can be referred to for more specific analytical results. 4.0 SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN The target area for soil management on the subject property has been identified as the entire property since the proposed development will encompass the entire property. Figure 2 illustrates the areas of the proposed soil management activities. It has been determined that one (1) foot of surface soil will be removed from the entire site totaling approximately 74,1971 cubic yards of soil. Approximately 42,400± cubic yards of soil • will be buried beneath the proposed pond, in trenches located throughout the property and used to create berms along the property boundaries and in centralized landscaped areas. The remaining 31,797± cubic yards of soil will be removed from the property and transported to an appropriate receiving facility. To accomplish this, the top one (1) foot of soil will be scraped from the eastern half of the property and stockpiled on the western half of the property. After the upper foot of soil has been removed from the eastern half of the property, the area of the pond would be excavated to a depth of three (3) feet below the proposed pond bottom. In addition, a "wedge" shaped area in the southwest comer of the property will be excavated to allow burial of some of this material. The clean material obtained from these excavations will be stockpiled on the east side of the property for future grading over the property. Once the pond and "wedge" shaped area are excavated, a portion of the scraped material will be buried in these areas. Several smaller areas located in proposed landscaped areas will be excavated and the stockpiled material will be buried and mounded to from a landscape berm. Berms will also be created along the eastern and northern property boundaries. Once the pond and wedge area have been excavated and backfilled, the upper foot of soil can be scraped from the western half of the property. The soil scraped from the remaining area of the property will be transported off-site to an approved receiving facility. All of the soil which is buried on-site will be capped with one (1) foot of clean soil, as will the remaining area of the property that has been scraped. Page 4 The Hei tage(k.Cwchogue In order to determine if the Sn4P has been properly completed. it is recommended that ten (10) re rescntative soil samples be collected tion the. subect aro rertv after the soil management has P I ) 1 1 been completed. The samples mould be analyzed for arsenic and mercury as an indicator of the eflectiveness of soil management prior to occupancy. The combination of cut and fill, soil redistribution, and cover material, topsoil and landscape/turf, will effectively isolate underlying agricultural surface soils, and will avoid any potential for human ingestion thereby providing an effective soil management technique to mitigate potential health impact of site use. 5.0 SOIL MANAGEMEN"ISUMMARY Section 4.0 provides the discussion of the Soil \;anagement Plan. as well as the basis for and implementation of same. The following list summarizes the soil management techniques to be employed as part of site development. 1. Scrape the upper ovelve (12) inches of soil from the eastern half the property and stockpile the material on the western half of the property for future burial on-site. 2 Fxcavate the pond and other burial areas on the eastern half of the propem and stockpile the clean material in open areas on the eastern half of the property. Place the scraped material that was previously stockpiled in the pond and burial excavations. q. Scrape the upper twelve (12) inches of-soil from the western half of the property and transpon the appropriate quantity of material off-site to an approved receiving facility. S. Excavate the remaining burial areas located on the westem portion of the property and, bury • and create landscape berms over the burial areas and along the northern and western property boundaries with the remaining scraped material. 6. Spread the clean soil (obtained from the burial areas), over the entire site. 7. Install foundations,utilities, establish rough grades. S. Collect ten (10) representative soil samples from the excavated area for analysis of arsenic as an indicator of the effectiveness of soil management prior to occupancy. 9. Complete home construction,first lift roads and curbs and amenity areas. 10. Final grade, install driveways and turf for homes. The sequence and operation described will ensure that soils are excavated and covered such that isolation and non-contact will ensure that the site provides a safe and habitable environment. 6.0 CONCLUSION This document outlines a management program incorporating the encapsulation and disposal of topsoil by scraping the upper twelve (12) inches of soil from the property and buying the contaminated soil. The clean soil would then be spread over the property to effectively eliminate potential health concerns in accordance with the SCDHS Guidance documents. Ten (10) endpoint samples will be collected and analyzed to ensure the effectiveness of soil management. It is requested that the Town of Southold review and approve this plan for implementation. stating that the proposed plan adequately meets the objectives of soil management to mitigate potential concerns with regard to detected soil chemical concentrations present on the land. • Page The Heritage @ Cutchogue ATTACHMENT A TECHNICAL REPORTS Pesticide Report The Heritage @ Cutchogue Cutchogue, New York • N&Y Job# 00026 November 8, 2007 Pesticide Report The Heritage @ Cutchogue Cutchogue,New York THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS 11 PAGES OF TEXT Prepared For: Heritage @ Cutchogue,LLC 1721-D North Ocean Avenue Medford,New York 11763 Prepared By: Nelson&Pope 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Long Island Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 110 Colin Drive Holbrook,New York 11741 • Pesticide Report The Ileritage & Cutchogue CONTENTS Lo INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Page 1 of 11 2.0 SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM Page 3 of 11 2.1 Sample Collection Page 3 of 11 2.2 Sampling Program Rationale Page 3 of 11 3.0 i.ABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 4 of 11 3.1 Analytical 'fest Methods Page 4 of 11 3.2 Analytical Results Page 4 of 11 4.0 -Q- ALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL Page 6 of 11 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Page 8 of 11 6.0 REFERENCES Page 10 of I1 APPENDICES Page 11 of 11 • Pesticide Report The Heritage @ Cutchogue 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Nelson & Pope, LLP has been contracted to prepare a Pesticide Report for the subject property. This report is intended to determine the concentration of pesticides and metals in site soils, since these substances were widely used for weed and pest control in Long Island agricultural practice. The subject property consists of a 46.16 acre parcel of fallow farm field and wooded land located in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York. The subject property is located at the northwest comer of Griffing Street and School House Lane, approximately 1,079 feet north of Main Road, Cutchogue. The parcel is more specifically identified as SCTM No. 1000-102-1-33.3. This document will be used to assist in evaluating the environmental and/or public health implications regarding the current concentrations of agricultural chemicals in on-site soils. The sampling program was designed and completed by N&P. Laboratory analytical data was prepared by Long Island Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The protocol used to direct this investigation was based upon the guidance offered by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) in a report entitled Procedures for Municipalities to Evaluate the Need for Soil Sampling and Soil Management at Subdivisions or Other Construction Projects with • Potentially Contaminated Soils. This SCDHS document is based on initial guidance from the New York State Department of Health Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment. The following sections detail the subject property and surrounding area characteristics, sampling program, protocol and quality assurance, lab analysis and results. A total of eighteen (18) soil samples were collected from nine (9) sampling locations situated throughout the property. Specifically, soil samples were collected from depths of 0-3 and 3-6 inches at each of the nine (9) sampling locations. Due to the past use of a majority of the property for agricultural purposes, the samples collected from five (5) locations were analyzed for the presence of pesticides and metals and the samples collected from the remaining four (4) locations were analyzed for arsenic which is a common constituent associated with pesticides. Initially, only the samples from the 0-3 inch intervals were analyzed. If any detected compounds within each individual sample were found to exceed their respective regulatory guidance values only then was the associated 3-6 inch interval sample analyzed. Review of the analytical results revealed the presence of elevated levels of arsenic and mercury which exceeded there respective regulatory agency guidance values across the subject property. As a result the 3-6 inch interval samples were analyzed for the presence of arsenic and mercury only and the analytical results revealed elevated concentrations of both constituents. In order to identify the depth to which arsenic and mercury were present, soil samples were collected from the three (3) of the previous sampling locations which exhibited the highest concentrations. The following sections of this report outline the sampling measures taken and provides a map illustrating the location of the samples collected. Appropriate recommendations are provided in Section 5.0. • The Heritage Via; Cutchugue Pesticide Report 2.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM (SAP) 2.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION A total of eighteen (18) soil samples were collected from nine (9) locations situated throughout the subject property on October 24, 2007. The soil samples were collected from depths of 0-3 and 3-6 inches below grade. Samples collected from five (5) of the locations were analyzed for the presence of pesticides and metals and the samples collected from the remaining four (4) locations were analyzed for arsenic which is a common constituent associated with pesticide use. The depths of the soil samples were selected to provide a profile of the soil located on the subject property. Initially, only the samples from the 0-3 inch intervals were analyzed. If any detected compounds within each individual sample were found to exceed their respective regulatory guidance values only then was the associated 3-6 inch interval sample tested. Results from both sample intervals revealed the presence of elevated concentrations of two (2) metals and as a result it was concluded that further sampling was necessary to identify the depth to which these inorganic compounds were present at the subject property. Additional sampling was conducted at the three (3) previous sampling locations which exhibited the highest concentrations and samples were collected at depths of 9-12 inches, 15-18 inches and 21-24 inches below ground surface on November 10, 2007. The sampling scheme employed was consistent with guidance available from SCDHS as referenced herein. A stainless steel hand auger decontaminated between uses (see Section 4.0), was used to extract all of the soil samples from the subject property. Figure 1 provides a map that identifies the various locations from which the soil samples were collected. The topography of the subject property is relatively flat. 2.2 SAMPLING PROGRAM RATIONALE Soil samples were collected in accordance with the recommendations of the SCDHS and NYSDOH, noted as follows: • samples were collected at depths of 0-3, 3-6, 9-12, 15-18 and 21-24 inches. • samples were directed toward those areas likely to have accumulated the highest contaminant levels. • samples were analyzed for the presence of pesticides and metals. Laboratory analysis results are discussed in Section 3.0. Since the proposed property will be used for a residential subdivision, the concentration of pesticides and metals is an important issue. In accordance with SCDHS and NYSDOH recommendations, the sampling and analysis program was intended to determine: • if site activities had caused degradation of soil quality on site; • if a soil management plan (SMP) is appropriate given the concentration of contaminants and the intended use of the site. The following section provides the laboratory analysis for the site samples, including test methods and analytical results. Page 2 of 1 r 4 l y kr Wf 141 11 • rS ..' «fir pie v a { s " pi —9 a" 411 Y ✓T d It, 3 k f �ht,s . ,i3 fs 'n �✓' S � t 1 UNI The heritage tri Cutchogue Pesticide Report • 3.0 LA13O1tATORY ANALYSIS 3.1 ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS The soil samples were transported to a New York State Certified Commercial ELAP Laboratory for analysis. Selection of the analytical test methods for the soil samples was based on the NYSDOli and SCDHS recommended soil sampling parameters for agricultural soils on Long Island. Analvsis of the soil samples consisted of pesticides and SCDHS metals for live (5) of the 0-3 inch samples and only arsenic for four (4) of the 0-3 inch samples. Review of the analytical results revealed that the 3-6 inch samples from all of the locations required testing. Specifically, all of the 3-6 inch samples were analyzed for arsenic and in addition, three (3) of the 3-6 inch samples were analyzed for mercury as well. Review of the results continued to reveal elevated concentrations of mercury and arsenic. In order to identify the depth to which arsenic and mercury were present. soil samples were collected from the three (3) of the previous sampling locations which exhibited the highest concentrations. A summary of the parameters analyzed for each sample is provided in Table 1. 3.2 ANALYTICAL, RESULTS Review of the analytical results for the 0-3 inch interval samples revealed that the five (5) samples selected to be analyzed for pesticides all contained elevated levels of pesticide compounds. However, none of the pesticide compounds detected were found to exceed there respective United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) or New York State Department of Environmental Protection (NYSDEC) Technical Administrative Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) 4046 recommended soil cleanup objectives. In addition, each of these five (5) samples were also analyzed for the presence of metals. All of the samples were found to contain elevated levels of several metals. Of these metals detected, only arsenic was found to exceed its corresponding SCDHS guidance value of 4 mg/kg in all of the samples analyzed. In addition, mercury was found to exceed its corresponding NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective of 0.1 mg/kg in three (3) of the nine (9) samples analyzed but was detected below its corresponding USEPA SSL of 610 mg/kg. With regard to the four (4) 0-3 inch samples analyzed only for arsenic, all were found to contain elevated levels which exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. Based on the 0-3 inch sample results, the 3-6 interval samples from each of the locations were analyzed as per the parameters summarized in Table 1. Review of the 3-6 inch interval sample results revealed that arsenic exceeded the SCDHS guidance value in all of the samples analyzed. With regard to mercury, it was found to be detected above its NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective in three (3) of the 3-6 inch samples analyzed and was also found to be below its USEPA SSL in each of these samples as well. • Page 4 of 1l The Heritage @ Cutchogue Pesticide Report Table 1 • Individual Sample Parameters Sam''Ie IdentiTcah4 , Sani le De th : 'Anal ical'Parameter` P I= 0-3 Pesticides & SCDH Metals 3-6 Arsenic PSM ` 0-3 Pesticides& SCDH Metals w � 3-6 Arsenic & Mercury t 9-12 Arsenic &Mercury 15-18 Arsenic &Mercury Y, 21-24 Arsenic &Mercury IrS ka t 0-3 Arsenic 3-6 Arsenic 0-3 Arsenic 3-6 Arsenic PS 5 a i 0-3 Pesticides & SCDH Metals 3-6 Arsenic & Mercury 9-12 Arsenic & Mercury act 15-18 Arsenic &Mercury 21-24 Arsenic & Mercury 0-3 Pesticides & SCDH Metals 3-6 _ Arsenic � 7 e � 0-3 Arsenic s,:''"r � s`r; `` 3-6 Arsenic p $'1"RD ;X� 0-3 Pesticides & SCDH Metals . r. . 3-6 Arsenic & Mercury 0-3 Arsenic s " r 3-6 Arsenic 9-12 Arsenic & Mercury a 4a� NU 15-18 Arsenic & Mercury Based on the 3-6 inch sample results samples were collected from the 9-12, 15-18 and 21-24 inch intervals from the locations of PS-2, PS-5 and PS-9 to further evaluate the vertical extent of arsenic and mercury contamination. Review of the analytical results detected the presence of mercury in seven (7) of the nine (9) samples collected but none were found to exceed the USEPA SSL or NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective for mercury. Arsenic was detected in six (6) of the nine (9) samples collected and only one (1) exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. A summary of the analytical results is provided in Tables 2A, 2B and 2C. The original laboratory analysis sheets as provided by Long Island Analytical Laboratories, Inc. are presented in Appendix A of this document. Page 5 of 11 TABLE 2A 0-3 INCH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Constitpents ESI . PS-2 i PS 3,',q PS 4 PS 5 PS 61 PS-7 : PS-8, PS-9 USFPA'� NYSDEC,s` (I3 = 0-3 4-3 0-3 0-3 SSL ' `TA614646 Pesdudes ..efz u1k ':`"= _ti k . . " u `k " ' u Ik a /k - u /ka,` ;fi"7k ❑` r ug/lig,` ug 1c 4,4'-DDD 9 17.2 NA NA 25.4 12 3 NA 14.6 NA 3.0000 2.900___ 4,4'-DDE 141 424 NA NA 399 345 NA 326 NA 2,000 2100 _ ..__ 4,4'-DDT 179 307 NA NA 701 441_ NA 325 NA 2,000 2.100_ Dieldrin ND 7.78 NA NA 16 8.50 NA ILS NA 40 44 Endosulfan I 7.40 ND NA NA ND ND NA 8.10 NA_47THO 900 Endosulfan II 25.4 17.3 NA NA 40.6 1 I NA 19.4_ NA 470.000_ _ 900 Endosulfan sulfate 109 144 NA NA 422 94.6 NA 140 NA NS 1,000 _Endrin _ 6.70 12.1 NA NA ND ND NA _ ND _ NA 23.000 100 He�lachlor 8.60 9,30 -INA- NA ND ND -NIA--- VD NA 1.000 _ 100 4,4'-Methoxvchlor ND ND NA NA 15.7 ND NA 7.50 NA NS NS >113etals "=; ''i. : :.:, , , .. - /k `m k 'gym '-'' mP=fu k,,;� :-'m k in /k mg/kg tn�/k' n) /kg >` maJlt* Arsenic* $.8'Tx �....� ;'714.5%:. < 12.8 ,' 738 =° :.^'1714" 10,8.. :.130.3 43.3, 40* 1 7.5 orS[i_.. Chromium 7.08 6,02 NA NA 8.23 7.58 NA 7.96 NA 390 _ 50 _Copper l 5.98 9.19 NA NA 12.6 859 NA 10 5 _NA NS 25 or SB Mcrcuiv 0.06 =©:16•= NA NA ', 0,.12x3 i,! 0.07 NA p I1 �'--� NA 61 0.1 Nickel 3.49 2.70 NA NA 3.30 3.79 NA 3 44 NA 1,600 13 or SR Lead 8.13 9.25 NA NA 17.1 12.1 NA 11.8 NA 400 SB Notes: See Table 2C Pay,5 of 10 The heritage iu Cutehogue Pesticide Report TABLE 2B 3-6 INCH ANALYTICAL RESULTS hSt +w ,y*' kv rc ,w�J' "pr I„ � 47 .:S1 -' .+, v /{v�c'ym /ICIll ,r ijl'1 .; :'!"m k `' -r..•fm '".t ,�;sx Arsenic � r�y +.7Z,5° ���-{'°/T°5�,'�sTLQ°{e`g �1�4ir+`c .,4 B .0* 7.5 or S Mercury NA `X?1.r NA NA rlY � NA NA '" 012'�s NA 610 --- 0.1 Notes: See Table 2C TABLE 2C 9-12, 15-18 and 21-24 INCH ANALYTICAL RESULTS a,' 4ea Arsenic* 2.25 1. m s' ND 2.31 2.45 2.03 ND ND 4-0* 7.5 or SB Mercury 0.036 0.040 0.022 0.087 0.039 0.031 0.024 ND ND 610 0.1 Table Notes: ND—Not Detected; NA=Not Analyzed; NS=No Standard; SB=Soil Background; Soil Background Values=Arsenic,3-12ulg/kg;Mercury,0.001-2ug/kg Bold/Shaded indicates the constituent exceeds the USP.PA standards; Italics/Shaded indicates the constituent exceeds the NYSDEC standards; Underlined indicates the constituent exceed the SCDHS guidance value for zrs'enic. "-SCDI-IS guidance value for Arsenic is 4 mg/kg. Page 6 of II r 4.0 QUALITY ASSGRMCE/QUAL,I'I1 CONTROL PROCEDURES Sampling protocol was conducted in accordance with USEPA accepted sampling procedures for hazardous waste streams (Municipal Research Laboratory, 1980. Sampling and Sampling Procedures for Hazardous Material Waste Streams, USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio EPA- 600,28(%- 018) and ASTM Material Sampling Procedures. All samples were collected by or under the auspices of USEPA trained personnel having completed the course Sampling of Hazardous Materials, offered by the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Separate QA QC measures were implemented for each of the instruments used in the Sampling and Analysis Program. Sampling instruments included a stainless steel hand auger and sample vessels. Prior to arrival on the subject property and between sample locations. the hand auger was decontaminated by washing with a detergent (alconox/liquinox) and potable water solution with distilled water rinse All sample vessels were "level A" certified decontaminated containers. Samples were placed into vessels consistent with the analytical parameters. After acquisition, samples were preserved in the field. All containerized samples were refrigerated to 4° C during transport. A sample represents physical evidence. therefore. an essential part of liability reduction is the Proper control of gathered evidence. To establish proper control, the following sample identification and chain-of-custody procedures were followed. Sample Identification Sample identification was executed by use of a sample tag, logbook and manifest. Documentation provides the following: 1. Project Code 2 Sample Laboratory Number 3. Sample Preservation 4. Instrument Used for Source Soil Grabs 5. Composite Medium Used for Source Soil Grabs 6. Date Sample was Secured from Source Soil 7. Time Sample was Secured from Source Soil 8. Person Who Secured Sample from Source Soil Chain-of-Custodv Procedures Due to the evidential nature of samples, possession was traceable from the time the samples were collected until they were received by the testing laboratory. A sample was considered under custody if. It was in a person's possession, or It was in a person's view. after being in possession, or 11 was in a person's possession and they were to lock it up. or It is in a designated secure arca. • Page 6 of 10 The Heritage @ Cutchogue Pesticide Report When transferring custody, the individuals relinquishing and receiving signed, dated and noted the time of the Chain-of- Custody Form. Laboratory Custody Procedures A designated sample custodian accepted custody of the shipped samples and verified that the information on the sample tags matched that on the Chain-of-Custody records. Pertinent information as to shipment, pick-up, courier, etc. was entered in the "remarks" section. The custodian then entered the sample tag data into a bound logbook which was arranged by project code and station number. The laboratory custodian used the sample tag number or assigned an unique laboratory number to each sample tag and assured that all samples were transferred to the proper analyst or stored in the appropriate source area. The custodian distributed samples to the appropriate analysts. Laboratory personnel were responsible for the care and custody of samples from the time they were received until the sample was exhausted or returned to the custodian. All identifying data sheets and laboratory records were retained as part of the permanent site record. Samples received by the laboratory were retained until after analysis and quality assurance checks were completed. • Page 7 of 11 The Scritage�,ai Etttchogue Pesticide Report 9.0 SUNDIARY AND CONCLUSION Phis investigation was completed in order to determine if certain pesticide related compounds ,vere present it,, the soils of the subject property. A sampling and analysis program (SAP) was designed to determine the concentrations of pesticides and metals in the soil in accordance with guidance offered by SCDHS and NYSDOH. The SAP consisted of collection of discrete soil samples at depths of 0-3 and 3-6 inches on the property. Laboratory analysis of the soil samples was performed using analytical test methods consistent with expected parameters and SCDHS,tNYSDOH guidance. The follo"ing presents an evaluation of Ute results of this investigation. 1. A total of eighteen (L8) soil samples from nine (9) sampling locations were collected from low points and strategic locations throughout the property. Specifically, samples were collected from 0-3 and 3-6 inch intervals at nine (9) individual sampling locations. Soil samples were analyzed for compounds related to former pesticide application due to the past and present use of the property for agricultural purposes. 3. Review of the analhtical results for the 0-3 inch interval samples revealed that the five (SI samples selected to be analyzed for pesticides all contained elevated levels of pesticide compounds. However, none of the pesticide compounds detected ,were found to exceed there respective United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) or New York State Department of Environmental Protection (NYSDEC) Technical Administrative Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) 4046 recommended soil cleanup objectives. In addition, each of these five (5) samples were also analyzed for the presence of metals. All of the samples were found to contain elevated levels of several metals. Of these metals detected, only arsenic was found to exceed its corresponding SCDHS guidance value of 4 mg/kg in all of the samples analyzed. In addition, mercury was found to exceed its corresponding NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective of 0.1 mg/kg in three (3) of the nine (9) samples analyzed but was detected below its corresponding USEPA SSL of 610 mg/kg. With regard to the four (4) 0-3 inch samples analyzed only for arsenic, all were found to contain elevated levels which exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. Based on the 0-3 inch sample results, all three (3) the 3-6 interval samples were analyzed for arsenic and three (3) of the samples were analyzed for mercury. Review of the 3-6 inch interval sample results revealed that arsenic exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. With regard to mercury, it was also detected above its NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective in all three (3) of the 3-6 inch samples analyzed but was found to be below its USEPA SSL in each of these samples as well. 3. Based on the 3-6 inch sample results samples were collected from the 9-12, 15-18 and 21-24 inch intervals from the locations of PS-2, PS-5 and PS-9 to further evaluate the vertical extent of arsenic and mercury contamination. Review of the analytical results detected the presence of mercury in seven (7) of the nine (9) samples collected but none were found to exceed the USEPA SSL or NYSDEC TAGM 4046 recommended soil cleanup objective for mercury. .Arsenic was detected in six (6) of the nine (9) samples collected and one (1) exceeded the SCDHS guidance value. • Page 8 of I The Heritage @ Cutchogue Pesticide Report In summary, representative soils on the subject property were sampled and analyzed for the • presence of pesticides and metals. Based on the laboratory results, elevated concentrations of arsenic and mercury were identified. As a result, it is recommended that a soil management plan be prepared to mitigate potential exposure to arsenic and mercury. • Date of Completion Gary Becker, P.E. NELSON&POPE • Page 9 of 7] I he Heritage a Culchogue Pesticide Report • 6.0 REFERENCES New York State Deparunent of F,nviionmental Conservation (NYSDFC), 1992, Sampling Guidelines and Protocols, Technologv Background and Quality COutIOUQn111tV Assurance for NYSDFC Spill Response Program,NYSDFC, Albany, New York. NYSDFC, 1994. Technical Administrative Guidance Memorandum. IM R-94-4046. Determination of soil cleanup objectives and cleanup levels, DiN-ision of Hazardous Waste Remediation, Albany, New York. NYSDOH, 1996, letter dated July 15. 1996 from Fdward Horn, Ph.D., Director Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment to Frank Randall, Chief. Inspection Services Bureau 1VYSDOH. SCDHS, Procedures for Municipalities to Evaluate the Need for Soil Sampling and Soil Management at Subdivisions or Other Construction Projects with Potentially Contaminated Soils. USEPA. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 1996, Publication 9355.4-23. Soil Screening Guidance Usci's Guide, Washington, D.C. • • Page 10 of 1 I The heritage @� Cutchugue Pesticide Report • APPENDICES • • Page 11 of 11 APPENDIX A LONG ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. LABORATORY DATA SHEETS f ISLAND D L �I F'tin L Lf�#6R ff.- - ANALYTICAL rrF I a L2BFRATPE5 fit6 ••i1�YDvRGA4'S&MefYPCAr SN..1fiGN:"t"`i*Y'` 1 of 12 pages October 30, 2007 Nelson&Pope Eric Arnesen 572 Watt Whitman Road Melvitle, Neve York 11747 Re: Heritage @ Ctttcllogue Dear Mr. Am esen; Enclosed please find the Laboratory Analysis Report(s) for sample(s) received on October 24. 2007. Lang island Analytical Laboratories analyzed the samples on October 25, 2007 for the followingr'. CLIENT ID _ ANALYSIS PS-1 0"-3" EPA 8051, SCDH Metals PS-2 0"•3 EPA 8081, SCDH Metals P8--3{0"-3"} 4 Total Arsenic Analysis • Total Arsenic Analysis_. PS-5 0"-3" F_PA 6081,,SCDH Metals PS-+5 0"-3" i EPA 8081, SCDH Metals PS-7 0"-3" Total Arsenic Analysis PS-80"-3" FPA 8081, SCDH Metals PS-9 0"-3"} Total Arsenic Analysis Samples received at 3.4'C. Report mvi=n dated November 9,2007 If you have any questions or require further information, please call at your convenience. Long island Analytical Laboratories Inc. is a NELAP accredited laboratory. All reported results meet the requirements or the NELAP standards unless noted above. Replan shall not be reproduced except in full, +:without the written approval of the laboratory. Long Island Analytical Laboratories would like to thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. BastRc�ar>is, LonglslandAnalyticalLabaratories, Inc. 10 Cohn Drove - Holhl•=sok r)4:,,.; Yol-i. 11741 hiin•'? (.. ' r,31 -1F -} 2-'4t:d) • Fay. -'631' 11 .;t72.B5n Email- _EAL;,_:Lialirc,-cc n 4 2 of 12 pages Client: Nelson & Pope Client ID: Heritage @ Cutchogue (PS _b)ie_ received: 10124107 Laboratory IC1: 1147358 Date extrac€ed; 10125/07 ASatrix: Soil Date analyzed: 10/25/07 ELAP #� 11693u^ PESTICIDES EPA METHOD 8081 COMPOUND CAS No. MDL RESULTS ugfkg Flag. . } Alert rs��i3tIC :,19 a4-ii 5 uo!k❑ �5 -_.. _ 3HC } 315L"ra 5 ug,rkg. _ `•5 u_ RHG i 319-86.:3 5 ugAg5 y-1311C {Lfndan©} € So-89-9 5 u-fk4 `5 T • F Chlordane 12769-03-6 15 u rk _ 13. 414'-.ROD 72-54-8 5 u +k 9 4.4'-DD[ 1 72-55-9 5 ua+kC 141 4,W-DDT 50-29-3 5 u k 179 _. Dieldrin 60-57-1 5 u kg e5 Endosuli`en 1 i 959=98.8 5 U +ko 7.40 s—� . .. Ersda,utfart N I 93212-65-4 5 udlkn 25.4 Endosul an sulrcla 1031-07-5 5 uaik _ 109 r- i Endrin '- - 72-20-8 } 5 uglkg 5.70 ---� Endrin aidehyda 7421-93-4 5 uglkg 5 C He tachlorI76-44-0 5 usJkQ 8.60 _.._. JHeptachicr a xide 1_ 1024-57-3 5 ugtko a a.4'-Wtetllox chlor 1 72-43-5 5 uatka Toxaphene i 0001,35-2 200 a ?k <200 Endrin ketone 1 C;3 494-70-5 .h 5 ualkq I - 5 i MDL 9 Minimum Detec£ion Limit. Calculated on a wet weight tbbaGrs nfWfFr MlichaeI Veraldi-Latloratory Director LONG ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC, 1 ;p Ce!u- 0-, H lbi op tJ .v; Yo n.. !1741 'rvMCFSt7Wi kNk[fT:G6L ?s'?7CkrS;OCY4Y° ?hens ICo11T -3. . '-�3 i61i11 172-35'_5nl...;i i,_I I •. lir at-'..cblrl 3 of 12 pages Client Nelson & Pope Client ID: Heritage @ CUtchogue {PS-1 (0'•-3j) Dale received: 10124(07 Laboratory ID: 1147358 Date analyzed: See Below Matrix: Soil METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MDL DATE RESULTS mglkg FLAG ANALYZED SILVER: Ag 1.65 m /k 10/25107 <1.65 -� ARSENIC, As 1.65 mg 1kq .m, 10125107 5.87 BERYLLIUM, Be 1.65 mg/kg 10125107 <1.65 CADMIUM, Cd 1.00 mglkg f 10/25107 _ <1.00 CHROMIUM, Cr 1.65 rngfkg 10/25/07 7.08 COPPER,. Cu 1.65 m tk 10125107 W 5.98 I MERCURY, H 0.020 mglkg 10/25/07 0.06 • NICKEL, Ni_ 1.65 m tk 10/25107 3.49 G LEAD, Pb - 1.G5 m !k 10/25/07 8.13 MOL =Minimum DeteetionLimit, Calculated on a wel weight basis Perfsxrred by EPA fnlethad 60108 shletnod: EPA 7471A / y Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director 1 vO G • SLAND ANALYTICAL t.A ORA10RIES INC. %1n :]alit! ❑ri:'- • Hr..lb:o k. V2w "o >:. Ii "=! 1 "1YJ1dC'kPt7r'vY kkdlp'fi:M'.(SfJitt:k}k;: D4Y F-Yvit=_i .31 } 472-340-'1 - F i I .. )�= _ u°:I h. int ail: L I �'. 11dllpi.Cp r0 4 of 12 pages Client: Nelson rope Client 0Heritage a@ Cutchogue TIPS-2 (0"-3")? Date received: 1412.4107 Laborator/ ID: 1147359 Date extraoted": 10125;47 Matrix: Soil _ Date analyzed. 101`/5107 EIRP #_ 11693 PESTICIDES EPA METHOD 8081 COI 309904--2MOLIy RESULTS ugJkm „ E1�q Aldrin 31.9-84-6 �uglko -BFi C ! 319-85.7 — 5 u Ik c5 [ 6-91-10 3191-86-8 5 uotg l -5 BHC tLindpne) I 58-89-9~ 5 uglkg <5 • Chlordaee 12759-03-6 15 utako -15 4,4'-DDD 72-54-8 t 51&&9 i 17.2 4.4'-DDE 72-55-9 ? 5 u Ikkg 1 424 4A` DDT 50-29-3 1 5 u * I 7 Dieldr•-n SU-5`r-1 5 ugikg 5 7.,76 Endasuffa7l 959.98-8 1 5 ucAq I Enaosultan II 33212-65-g I 5 44 117.3 Ende utfan sulfate 1D31-07-8 S u 7c 144 Endrin 72.2D-8 a u 1k 12.1 E:ndon aldeh' de 7421-.93-4 5 uttk. 4+ Heptachlor 7C--44-6 5 ug7kg 1 9.30 Heptachlor= oxide 1624-57.3 5 u ?kms F5 4,4'4Aai1)cx'ChVjr 72-43-5 5 UQAQ <5 Toxaphene. 8OD1-35-2T 200 utllkg 1x266 Endrin ketene 53494-70-5 5 u 1kg_ =5 MOL= t.7lnimum Detection Limit. Calcutaied on a vret vleight bests Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director LONG j ISLAND LABORATORIES bt ,-- is I o!in r,:e t r _rao§ Pia `uric 11--'el .-70bA7"OW.IA i66TUI YMMOMS TWW' "h[iF I.t-.. 11 172-Z 5 of 12. paces a Client: Nelson & Pope I Client €D: Yeritage @ Cutchogue i (PS-2 Date received: 10)24/07 ; LaboratoryI0: 1147359 Date analyzed: See Below Matrix: Soil METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MOL DATE RESULTS mglkg FLAG _ ANALYZED _ SILVER. ftg_ 1.65 m 1k J 10125107 <1.65 i ARSENIC, As 1.65 mglkg { 10125107 12.0 1 8ERYLLIUfj. Be 1.65 mglkg J 10125107 <1.65 CADP4IUM, Cd 1.00 m 1k 10/25/07 <1.00 CHROMIUM- Cr 1.65 mglkg J 10/25/07 6:02 J COPPER. Cu 1.65 mgfkg J 10125/07 9.19 MERCURY, Hg, 0.020 mg/kg 10/25107 0.15 • NICKEL, Ni 1.65 m lk 10/25/07 2.70 _ LEAD, Pb 1.65 m fk 10125/07 9.25 MDL =Minimum Detection Limit Calculated on a wet weighi basis Perrcrmiscl by EPA Ivletttod 50100 Aiethadi EPA 7471A Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director LONG • 11RAND ANAWTtCAt LABORATORIES INC. 1i-3 Cclir nritTT Hoibr a Nlly ori, 11-w 41 "MROWROWS AAAIFrNt N*XMlC:4S IOC-Ar" -'hDn e. 161+11 =7? 34.0 ri - FN n ic,3ii b. jtlail: IAL;='lialirr..com f- II 6 of 12 pages Client: Nelson S Pope Client ID: Heritage @ Culchogue Gate reeei+reel: 10124/07 Laboratory ID; 1147362 Gate extracted: 10125107 Matrjx Soil _ i Date analvz d: 10,QW07 ELAP,#': 11693 PESTICIDES EPA METHOD 8081 COMPOUND CAS No. MDL RESULTS Fla Aldrin 1 309.00.2 5 unikg 55 _ ......- -- 1 u- filiC 31M4-6 j. 5 vgtkg a ,, pr-Ir – I 319-8;?-7 � 5 uelke •=5 5- BHG 319-36.6 5 u91kg <5 SFIC fiindanei�; 5889.9 S ugfko �5 I • Chlordane ... 12789-03-6 15 ug-'kg ug-'kg <15 �,... 4,4'-DDD I 72-54.8 I 5 U 1k 25.4 4.4'-DDE 72-55-8 5 uolkg 399 ._ 4.4-DDT 50-29-3 15 uqlkq 701 1 Dieldrin 60-57.1 I 5uglkg 16� Endosuflart l 95998-8 15 uglk t '5 Endosulfan 11 33212-t35-J i 5 uglkg 1 40$ . ,. Endosuifan suliate 4031-07.8 5u 7k 422 End.ir, 72.20.8 5 ulk I 5 Endrin afdah•�de 7421-53-4 5 UO <5 ' Heptachlor ?844.8 a uglk9 I Heptachlor epoxide _1024-57-3 5tiykq 1 <5 I j 4,4'-P4eihh72 43.5 5 u 1 15-7 ._ oxvcwr tk iI Toxaphene 8001-35-2 200 u lkq -20p Endrin ketone 53494-70-5 5 UqLkQ <5 MDL = Minimum Detection Limit. Calcutafed on a w ei weight bail i Michael Veraldi-Laboratory director •j i` LONG 14LAND AH LYTiCAt t_ALORATOWWS WNC: ill C,alin C,ri;u ^1c.v < 1': a' 'rOi)d0�'6tM A(Ol'r`ICAf.SOr4r LINS UMAY F i.i.n ,� •i; 472 3LOO • Fa _-?-. 1 i-� �t35 F�-.qil. Li:-_.._ 'ili!-i 7 of 12 pages Client: Nelson & Pope t Client ID: Heritage Cutchogue L 5 (0"-3")) -Date-received. 10124107 � Laboratory ID: 1147362 Date analyzed: See Below ;Matrix: Soil METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MDL DATE RESULTS mglkg FLAG ANALYZED SELVER, Ag_ 1,65 mglkg 110/25107 .1.65 I ARSENIC. As 1.65 m-qfkq 10126107 13,8 BERYLLIUM, Be 1.65 rilq 10125/07 _F _ <1.65 CADMIUM, Cd 1.00 mglkg 10125107 <1.00 CHROMIUM, Cr 1.65 rn 10/25107 8.23 COPPER. Cu 1.65 rn lk 10/25/07 12,6 _:. • MERCURY, Hgo 0.D20 mc/k, 10/25/07 C 4:12 NICKEL, Ni 1.6 m lk 10125/07 3.30 L LE4D, Pb 165 n)2tkg 101.25107 -� 17.1 tvIDL - Wrlunurn Detection Lurit. Calculated on a mat-aeighi besis R=rformce by EPA rvl2Utod 601 DO hMethud. EPA 747iA Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director LONG • ISLAND ANALYTICAL. LABGRAT RKS I SG, 110 con Dr!"e . 'Olerc, k. New, :t?•;t __ ';^ipfO.B+W5 A.NACYPUI MMJOW i'V'Ar• PhCon i' (63ll .1-2 ..4�C�.` j ai -C,?II 172-S 505Ilia. A.1 8 of 12 pages { Client: Nelson & Pope I Client ID: Heritage @ Cutc}ioyue (PS-6 0`-3 Date received: 10/24107 l Laboratory D. 1147363 Date ex#racfed= 10125!07 j Matrix- Soil Date analyzed: 10/25107 �FLAPk11693 PESTICIDES EPA METHOD 8081 COMPOUND CAS No. M0L RESULTS u,'!k. Fla l Aldrin 3C,9-00.2 5 U A �6 -BHC .�319-84.6 _ 5 U9fkg . . •o _ 11 -BHC 319-85-7 5 ugfkg <o 67-13HC F 319-86.8 5 ugekg <5 —� BHC 'Lindane) 5$-89-9 5 ug/kg _ 15 • Chlordene �I 12789.03-6 15 u fk0 <15 T 4,4'-DDD 1 72-54-8 5 ug?kg 12.3 4.4'-DDE f 72-55-9 5 ualky 34$ 4,J-4'-DDT 50-29-35 u011t 441 Dieldrin W-57-1 _ 6 U91kg Endosulfan I 959-98-5 5 uglltg <5 Endosulfan II • 33212-65-9 5 ugli(q l 11 Endasutfan sulfate 1631-t77-5 I 5 u lk _ J4.8 Endrin 72-26-8 5 u lk =5 �� Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 5 AA2 <5 Fle lachlor 7C-44-8 5uglk _ <5 1 He lachlore oxide 1024-57-3 5uglk <5 4,4'-PAelhox chlor 72-43-5 _ 5 .rk <5 Toxaphene 8001-85-2 200 ugi?kg 200 _ Endrin ketone 5349470-5 5 u A =5 141DL= Minimum Detection Limit _ Calculated Dn a vt2t weight basis Michael Veraldi-Laboralcq Director LONG ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. no cwi., Drn; . nnitro:a=. rl:•:: ` orh s c1 ''VNO.RWWi ARMTHC 15QVVWKE WAY' Fh:o)?e IU31, i -C-"i400 - Fax .��i 4�' - St - ;=i L. L'aA[ Ol 9 of 12 pages Clients Nelson & Pope Client ID; Heritage @ Cutchogue Date received: 10/24107 Laboratory 1D: 1147353 Date analyzed: See Below Matrix Soil METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MDL DATE RESULTS mgJkg FLAG ANALYZED SILVER, A 1.65 m fk 10/25/07 ARSENIC, As 1.0"5 ntg(k 10!25/07 17. BERYLLIUM, Be 1.65 m /k 10125/07 01.65 _ I CADMIUM, Cd 1.6-6'm Ik 10125/07 I <1.00 CHROMIUM, Cr 1.65 m ik 10125/07 7.58 COPPER, Cu 1.65 m !k 10125107 _ 6.59 MERCURY, H-. 0.020 mg/kg 10125107 0,07 • NICKEL, Ni 1.65 mglkg 10125109 �v3,79 LEAD, Pb 1.65 mg/kq mg/k10125/07 12.1 MDL = Minimum€]election umit. cakulaled or a wel weight basis PFrormed by EPA Nleihotl601OB dvlethc,,J. EPA 7471A tulirhaei Veraldi-Laboratory Director ISLAND • ISLAIWD ANALYTICUAL LASORA,T{?RKS WC, 116f i,lifi dr —pl.^,fpnh.P110:10We':i "'Ork t I r=1 "t7 .' idAFn"OA'S AN,LiYnG.LE SGt GHi Tsi?NiY P110:10p 7F.'311 moi? -L{ir =;-x ,Uo11 4 C }S5L'6 • Fri a L i A L 'i .;:I.Y,._.: On? If)of ' pgc5 Client: Nelson & Pope Client ID Heritage @ Cutchogue I EPs-8(0--3"}) Date recelv110/2 5)7 Laboratory IU: 1147365 Date extractete d'. 10/25107 j BAatrix: Sail Date analyzed: 1t)/Z5107 ; ELAP 9: 11693 PESTICIDES EPA METHOD 8081 COMPOUND CAS No. MDL RESULTS ugikg Play Aldrin 309-90-2 .....,..I_ 5 Ljgflkg 1 •-5 - Blic 319.84-8 5 uglicg 15 8- BHC 319-95-7 5 ucdlkg -5 I 3 - BHC 31986-8 I 5 uglkg -5 z,-l3HC1:Undaney 58-89-9 1 6uglkg I +5 ) • Chlordane 12789-03-615 uq+kq I <15 1 4,4`- DDD. 72-54.11 5 u rk 14.6 4.4'-DDE 72-55-9 5 u tk. 326 1 4,4-DDT 50-29-3 5 y9lllcg l 325 Dieldrin 50-57-1 5 u Jkt 1. 11-11 Endasutfan 1 959-98-8 j 5 uglltq t 8 1(! Endosulfan li 33212-65-9 5 u rk 1 19.4 { EnJosuEfan sulfate _ 1031-07-8 1 5 u +It { 140 Endrin 72-20-6 5 u +kq f <5 Endrin aldehy dF 7421-93-4 ' +kq �5 He lachlor 76A4-8 5 uq+k <5 ileplachlor epoxide 1924-57-3 5 ugAig <5 4;4'-rvleihoxychlor 72313-5 4 5 UQ.1KQ ' 7 5D Taxa hene 8001-35-2 260 u, kg I <200 1 Endrin ketone ?+34.94-7V u 5 5 .1t <5 ---�� MD1. =r-Ainimrum Deleriran Limit Calculated on am-et weight basis Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Dlrestor ISLAND ANALYTICAL LA40RATORIES INC. "UhrORROW1 AAWyncw d itrions i8rAF, Phone +6311 4-2,344 - ,031 , �,� - 5f), Fir.:' ,I.i',L icoal 11 of 12 Fades Client: Nelson & Pope Client ID: Heritage @ Cutchogue (P5-6 0"-9")) Date received: 10/24/07 Labotato IiO: 1147365 Date analyzed: See Below Matrix: Soil METALS ANALYSIS PARAMETER MDL DATE RESULTS mglkg FLAG ANALYZED SILVER,Ag 1.65 m Ik 10125/07 X1.65 ARSENIC, As 1.65 mo/kIQ mo/k10125/0710.3 m BERYLLIUM, Be 1,65 1k 10125107 _ X1.65 CADMIUM, Cd 1.00 m Ik ( 10/25107 <1.00 i CHROMIUM, Cr 1.65 mglk 10125/07 7.96 COPPER, Cu 1.65 M-Qikq 10/25/07 10.5 MERCURY, Hg• ©.020 m lk 10.+25107 0.11 _ • NICKEL. Ni _ _,1.65M kR 10125107 3.44 LEAD, Pb 1.65 mgtkg 10/25107 11.8 MGL= Minimum Detection Linlil. Calculated on a vier weigh) basis Perloamed by EPA Me"d 60,103 *Method: EPA'471A Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director i LONG • '• ISLAUD AldALY€IC#'. LABORATORIES WC. .t0 r lin ntise • Hnlbr3r ew rc.: 11':41 'iTJ,{i�RRDW€kHAlPRC 34Yi7K3N1FT - "1-:•F.B �n�'j <t-_ 911p • 1'J f -1 - N4fIE - E �isiI LI �_lio l i nr,,.C:opt 12 of 12 Pages Client: Nelson & Pope Client ID: Heritme � Gutchocsts� Date received: 14124?07 LaboratoryID: See C3elow _ Date extracted: 10/25107 Matrix Soil _ Date analyzed: /0125107 ELAP 1€ 11663 TOTAL ARSENIC ANALYSIS Lab ID Client ID _MRL Results mgtkg FLAG__ 1147350 PS-30"-3"L9.65 mg?kq 14-5 1147361 PS-4{0•'-3„} . __.1.65 tgLk� 12.6 1147364 PS-7 Q"-_3"} 1_651 ctfkg 10.8 1147366 P 13.3 I MRL= PAinimum Reporting L[mil Calculated on awe. vie ght bazis • Periormed by Sled-843 Method 60105 Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director -j' LONG ISLAND "ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES W. 110C:uiin bii, :ICr,::m< 1r.r rr. t:- l; _ "',-,M0PkYW i A.NAEMAI k_*VrfOBS rCG#Y^ FI}oro ;__J1_ �:�':i=U;1 • F=- �..f ; _ 9, • cft�.ill. i'' LONGNYSDOH ELAPX 11693 USEPAX NY01273 ISLAND CTDOHX PH-0284 ANALYTICAL NJAIHAI DEPX164456 LABORATORIES INC, PADEPX 68-2943 "T0M0RR0WSANelrncAG SMUTIoNs toner" 1 of 3 pages October 31, 2007 Nelson & Pope �C Eric Arnesen g gNOV 4 2007 1�1/C572 i' oad Melville,lNew tYork 1man 11747 Ar :�' d IPE Re: Heritage Dear Mr. Amesen: Enclosed please find the Laboratory Analysis Report(s) for sample(s) received on October 30, 2007. Long Island Analytical Laboratories analyzed the samples on October 31, 2007 for the following: CLIENT ID ANALYSISWAnalsis • PS-1 3"-6" Total Arsenic An PS-2 3"-6" Total Arsenic and Merc ' 3"-6" Total Arsenic An PS-4 3"-6" Total Arsenic An PS-5 3"-6" Total Arsenic and MercPS-6 3"-6" Total Arsenic An PS-7 3"-6" Total Arsenic Analysis PS-8 3"-6" Total Arsenic and Mercury Anal sis PS-9 3"-6" Total Arsenic Analysis Samples received at 3.4°C. If you have any questions or require further information, please call at your convenience. Long Island Analytical Laboratories Inc. is a NELAP accredited laboratory. All reported results meet the requirements of the NELAP standards unless noted above. Report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Long Island Analytical Laboratories would like to thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. Best Regards, Long is/and Analytical Laboratories, inc. • 110 Colin Drive • Holbrook, New York 11741 Phone (631 ) 472-3400 - Fax (631 ) 472-8505 ' Email: LIAL@lialinc.com I, 2 of 3 pages Client: Nelson & Poe Client ID: Heritage Date received: 10/30/07 Laboratory ID: 1147602-1147610 Date extracted: 10/31/07 Matrix: Soil Date analyzed: 10/31/07 ELAP #: 11693 TOTAL ARSENIC ANALYSIS Lab ID Client ID MRL Results mg/kg FLAG 1147602 PS-1 3"-6" 1.65 mg/kg 7.22 1147603 PS-2 3"-6" 1.65 ma/k17.5 1147604 PS-3 3"-6" 1.65 Qk6 m /k63.31 1147605 PS-4 3"-6" 1.65 mg/kg 14.0 1147606 PS-5 {3"-6"} 1.65 mg/kg 16.1 1147607 PS-6 3"-6' 1.65 ma/kg 17.5 • 1147608 PS-73"-6" 1.65 mg/kg 11.5 1147609 PS-8 3"-6" 1.65 mg/kg 11.4 1147610 PS-9 3"-6" 1.65 mglkg 1 mg/k16.4 MRL= Minimum Reporting Limit Calculated on a wet weight basis Performed by SW-846 Method 60106 Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director LONG ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. 110 Colin Drive • Holbrook, New York 11741 '70MORRO SAN&YUCALSULMONsTODAY' Phone (631) 472-3400 • Fax (631) 472-8505 • Email: LIAL@lialinc.com 3 of 3 pages Client: Nelson & Poe Client ID: Heritage Date received: 10/30/07 Laboratory ID: See Below Date extracted: 10/31/07 Matrix: Soil Date analyzed: 10/31/07 ELAP #: 11693 TOTAL MERCURY ANALYSIS Lab ID # Client ID MDL Results mg/kg FLAG 1147603 PS-2 3"-6" 0.020 mg/kg 0.14 1147606 1-5-5 3"-6 0.020 mg/kg 0.15 1147609 PS-8 J3"-6"I0.020 mg/kg 0.12 MDL = Minimum Detection LimiL Calculated on a wet weight basis SW-846 74 71 A • Michael Veraldi-Laboratory Director LONG • ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. 110 Colin Drive • Holbrook, New York 11741 MMOL MAlutrncAt.solurloNstW4Y' Phone (631) 472-3400 • Fax (631) 472-8505 • Email: LIAL@lialinc.com ISLAND A SII KI A rf T I C N. L';.' t A DO PATO R l '5 ItX '3Ur-U0,'4 I of 3 pages Nov-amber 14, 2007 Nelson. Pope &Voorhis Eric Arnesen 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Re: Heritage @ cutclicogue Dear Mr. Ame5en'. Enclosed please find the Laboratory Analysis Report(s) for sample(s) received on November 12, 2007, Long island Analytical Laboratories analyzed the samples on November 13, 2007 for the follomirig: • CLIENT ID ANALYSIS B-2 9-12 Total Arsenic & Plercury AnaPysis B-2 15-18 Total Arsenic& Me rcury Analysis B-221-24 Total Arsenic & Mercury Analysis B-5 9-12 Total Arsenic & Mercury Anal B-5 15-118 Total Arsenic & Mercury Analysis B-521-24 Total Arsenic& Mercury Analysis B-9 9-12 Total Arsenic& Mercury Analysis B-9 15-18 Total Arsenic & Mercury Analy5is B-9 21-24 Total Arsenic & Mercury Analysis Samples received cl 2'C. If you have any questions or require further Wormadon, please Call at your convenience. Long Island Analytical Laboratories Inc. is a NELAP accredited laboratory. All reported results meet the requirements of khe NELAP standards unless noted above. Report shat: not be reproduced except In full, without the witten approval of the laboratory. Long island Analytical Laboratories would Ue to thank you for the opportunity to be of Service to you. Best Regards. • ionglsfandAnaijWcal Laboratories, Inc. 1111 ,r Ln _j I-iv r- - H o I b TIj K, X'(-,ve Yl)r1k. 11 d1 Pi- ' -'; ') �ay (6At 731 ) 2 8'-05 2 of 3 pages Client: Nelson 8. Pope I Client ID: HeritageCutcho• ue Date received: 11/12/07 I Laboratory ID: 1148356-1148358 Date extracted: 11/13/07 Matrix: $oil I Date analyzed: 11113107 E #: 11693 TOTAL ARSENIC ANALYSIS Lab ID Client ID MRL Results_m fk Fla 1148350 t B-2 9 12 1.65 mg/kg I 2.25 1148351 B-2 15-18 1.65 m«/kg 1.98 � }- 1148352 B-2 21-24 1.65 mniko I <1.65 I 1146353 B-5 9-12 1.65 inalka I10,3 1148354 8-515-18 1.65 m llkg 1 2.31 1148355 ; B-5 21-24 I 1.65 mo/k2-45 1148356 B-9 9-12 5 1.65 mo/k 1 2M 1148357 B-9 15-18 1.65 ma/kg 1 � <1.65 • 1148358 B-9 21-24 1.65 mg/ka j <1.65 j PARL= Minimum Repcatinc Limit Catculated an a wat weighs ba,-;s Performed by SW-846 Method 80108 Michael Veratdi-Laboratory Director 1 ` LONG7 • 16 ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORKS INC. 110 �.olm Ufi,e Ho.bfoc Nl-w York +171 ,t1 - ^— "TpooWROWrMAWPCAifrIXUTIOH3TW:,d.y" Phire :o21,� 30Q • Far. ` - cm Uhl. -v- 3 of 3 pages { Clielii: Itsan F'ooe Client ID: Heritage Cutchogue ` mate received: 1111107 _ Latraratory 1D: See Belaev �L�ai? extracted: 11r13fU7 _ Matrix: Soil _ (Date anal ed: 11113107 EL-AP #: 11693 TOTAL MERCURY ANALYSIS Lab ID N Client ID MDL Results mg/kg Flag 1148350 j B 2 9-12 G 0.020 r4i#1§cg 4.030 j 1148351 B 2 15 18 0.0?0 mglk 0.040 11483$2 { B-2 21-24 0,02_0 mg/kg { 0-022 _ —T-1483531 B-5 9-12 { 0.020 mg/kg [ 0.087 • 1148354 8-5 15-18 0.020 mqncq 0.038 1148355 6-5 21-24 0.020 m2 kg 1 0.031 I 114-8356 B-9 9-12 0.020 mgllkg 0.024 1 1148357 B-915-18 0.020 mg?kg -=0,02 ^ �� 1148358 B-9 21-24 0.020 m, ?k X0.02 MOL = falihimurn Detection Linik Caimlated on a wet weight basis S11-845 7471A. j Michaet Veraidi-Laboratory Defector LONG ISLAND r ANALYTICAL LABt?PAS' S INC. :10 Cohn orive • rlc;br- , €__,, ,« ;; -.17st _ .•"GN6RSG{f'3 Ft,AiYr',CAE SMUTfG�HS? qWl Pi - :641; J `'-::•9 U:J Fd f0a �J '7 ' r LONGISLAND ANAVtWRI 1.14 C;-Iirl Uriva HulDrciuk, PJerar ''r't I r' 11741 •Phone(631) 472-3400 -Fax (631) 472-8505 •Email: LIAL@IiLdinc`.con IIOAL LAVOR INC. 'rc.«.nxv�nnrinu+mumwlrnm- g✓IrilAIN OF CUSTODY REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS DOCUMENT (�r C`L`I'i' N: NA3AG'ADDFlcSS CQNTA;:1 '1$,L �n.,,;ji•,,,I "WELe!t t'.•rUNFiu(IEI unit JIM fiMIPL�l6EnLE0 -' 'YE$1'MO LAanG4Tt3RYCHAItd PHONE , r ' ...,. .TIME - -AIN-'--- 5626 r `•�''L '4.%•'] "� 1.,;--:�, n,aauLelI R+NIC�vnlxTl car_ nue C".k1I1'_VT COMTFINERIEI (1 �®+� MIE , 41 1 -_� - PTJU IErr-u�cr•TIGn bkte,.l`rCy,-?y M� i`."r—�u 44 SVJFLES FEGEiu 1 S �p / / ! / r•ilo�rsc,. TERMS B Cfl1Swmr3 ere Wli..p.In nlll>rr,Ilwly rlpy, naviI 4nr..[a rrno,ml 1P.r mnIlh. O C LABORATORY %IATYPEPRES. H SAMPLE P• 10 x 1 UIJITS I ChP.zylp,E) LOOATLON f P JJ fil /� f /•!, rOF hr Lnmwry We /corrunrta, p L14 + 1 ? ! x Y 2.11 7 I r i 21 a Lf X -I_ It I ,-!; , -I_ _ z � L - art _..._-- — 3-`l.. 1 �x x x. 11 X r r 11. 13. - 12, '— 14. — _ -- MATRIX: SAIL; SL=5LUDOE;L=LIGIJID:iiLb_pF.ihJlf L`dCi WATER: TUPNARC IND REQUIRED. COMMENTS t INSTRUC11U1a3 A=A R;VII WIPE,FC=''AIHT(,*HtPS;RIA,MILK IMTCP.IAL, + '3=CIL JORLIFL LI STAT TYPE: G=GP.AB; --fxitdPV5trE.3S_SP1.tT SPCON + PRES; ICE,IiCL.H2804 NAQH.NA2Sa)3 BY ) r/ PA W HLI RCL;+ DUI- HED BY V'NA7LID'TE 15 11 TCG NBfdf c 11 �� � RECEIVED (GNy,?URrI DATE PFlIVTCO I•L.A1E 'IIISMFUEN ISICAI4TI:P.E/ IDrVT= ( F+NIfVTcD NP.IAE - • -- -FlF� LED E��;A..-yt:L�;_Tpf�IhN D0.fC 1t RI4IPJTEUN4IAE LIh1F L N . . . (te,• �� -' TIME '"f CANARY-LAB;PINK- 30PIPLECUSTODIANJ001,DRJROD-Ov!-N, hY�CGHELAPOIIB:f'a U5EPA#NY0I273 AIHAr164.155 CTLIOHkPH-026-1 ND A4 LLA tit iSLAND ANAM"CAL LADOPATORMS LONG ISLAND ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. INC. DATA REPORTING FLAGS For reporting results, the following "Flags' are used: A: Time not supplied by client, may have exceeded holding time 0: Holding time exceeded, results cannot be used for regulatory purposes C: Minimum detection limit raised due to matrix interference 0- Minimum detection limit talsed due to target compound interference E: r-Animum detection limit raised due to non-target compound irilerferen4^e F: Minimum detection limit raised due to insufficient sample volume G: Sample received in incorrect container H: Sample not preserved, corrected upon receipt t: Dilution Water does not meet QC Criteria J: Estimated concentration. exceeds calibration range K:Target compound found in blank L: SubCDnkra&or ELAP#11398 • M: Subcontractor ELAP #10320 N: Subcontractor MVLAP 9102047.0 0: Subcontractor AlHA#103GO5 P: Subcontractor A2LA 2004-01 Q: Subcontractor ELAP#11026 R; Subcontractor ELAP#IOI55 S: Subcontractor ELAP#11501 1: Subcontractor CTC U: Subcontractor ELAP#11685 V: QC affected by matrix W: Subcontractor ELAP#10248 X: QC does not meet acceptance criteria Y, Sample container received with head space Z: Insufficient Sample Volume received AA: Preliminary results, cannot be uses for regulatory purposes. 3B-' Spike recovery does not meet OC criteria due to high target concentration CC: Date reported below the lower limit of quantitation and should be considered to have an increased quantitative uncertainty. DO: Sampling information not supplied andlor sample not taken by qualifled technician, therefore verifiability of the report is limited to results only. Report cannot be used for regulatory purposes, EE: Subcontractor ELAP : #11777 FF: Unable to verify that the wipe samples submitted conform to ASTM F1792 or specifications issued by the EPA. • _.o Cohn Drivp - HolbrooK, ;ew, York 1 17-11 P i,c2 n e ?E-"31 ; 44'2- 4 1)0 6 17 4 72-8 L,Ul 5 - E fna,j 1: L I A L. I I a 1 F)C c rn, The Heritage @ Cutchogue • ATTACHMENT B SCDHS GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PROCEDURES FOR MUNICIPALITIES TO EVALUATE THE NEED FOR SOIL SAMPLING AND SOIL MANAGEMENT AT SUBDIVISIONS OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WITH POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED SOILS (Draft February 2006) 1.0 Background &Purpose Over the past few years, municipal planning agencies have referred proposed residential and commerciaUndustrial construction projects that may contain potentially contaminated soils to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) for review and approval. Although not required by the sanitary code, SCDHS reviewed the projects as a courtesy to the municipality, but will no longer be able—to. provide this service. This document has been generated, with input from the New York State Department of Health, to provide guidance to municipalities for reviewing soil sampling plans, evaluating soil sample results and approving Soil Management Plans (SMP) if they are deemed necessary. Sampling and analysis protocols, soil screening levels, and remedial strategies are included in this guidance document. 2.0 Applicability • Determinations of applicability of this document should be based on the historic use of the parcel of land, on actual soil sample data, and/or on any other factors that the municipality deems relevant to the likelihood that residual contamination is present in soils on the tract. This document applies only to direct exposure pathways, such as dermal exposure, ingestion and inhalation. At present the county uses New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's Technical and Administrative Guidance Memorandum (.AGM) HWR-94-4046 to evaluate the potential for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to contaminate the groundwater. This guidance document applies only to tracts of land with non-hazardous soils, which are defined as soils that do not contain hazardous wastes or substances, as defined by 6 NYSCRR Part 371.1(d) or other relevant New York State codes. Data on sites that prove to contain hazardous soils or that may be sources of groundwater contamination should be referred to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation or other appropriate agency for regulatory action. 3.0 Sampling Surveys If soil evaluation is required by a municipality, based on historical use of the site, the owner of a realty subdivision or other development project should conduct a sampling program of surface and/or subsurface soils on the subject tract in conformance with Appendix B of this document. Appendix B provides guidance on the development of a soil sampling plan including the recommended number of sampling locations, based on past and future use, sample collection protocols, and sample analysis protocols. • The soil sampling plan should normally consist of collection of soils at each subdivision lot, and any locations known or suspected to be chemical mixing areas, chemical disposal or spill areas, greenhouses, bams, drainage structures, floor drains, leaching pools, or runoff sites including sumps or swales, or areas of disturbed vegetation. Reduced sampling may be appropriate at sites consisting wholly of prior uniform use (e.g., a single agricultural field), and may be sampled at fewer representative locations. Said samples should be collected from the low point on the subdivided parcel (or subdivision lot), or from any other location that is likely to be the settling point for fine-grained sediments, and/or proposed rear yard area of lots within residential subdivisions. A. Sampling Protocols Soil samples should be collected in accordance with New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) protocols and analyzed at an Environmental Laboratory Approval Program (ELAP), or National Environmental Laboratory Approval Program (NELAP) approved laboratory. Composite samples from multiple locations and/or depths should not be used. Appropriate sample collection procedures and containers should be obtained from the laboratory performing the analyses. The analytical results should be reported on a dry weight basis. It is recommended that at least 2 sets of soil samples be taken from each collection point; the first from the surface to a depth of two to three inches, and a second sample from a depth of three to six inches. Deeper samples may also be warranted at some sites. Analysis of the surface sample should be reviewed to determine the need for a SMP using the EPA Soil Screening levels (SSLs) provided in Appendix A. Analysis of the deeper samples can be delayed until the need for a SMP is determined. These samples can provide additional information that may be necessary in evaluating the SMP strategies. • B. Laboratory Analysis Protocols All analyses should be conducted by a laboratory that is certified for the required analytical methods through either ELAP or NELAP programs. Results should be reported on a dry weight basis. At a minimum, it is recommended that soils from former agricultural sites be analyzed for metals and chlorinated pesticides. Analyses for chlorphenoxy acid, organophosphate, or other pesticides and chemicals should be considered based on site- specific conditions. At a minimum, the following analytes should be required for soils at former agricultural sites: Metals Chlorinated Pesticides arsenic aldrin endosulfan I & II beryllium alpha-BHC endosulfan sulfate cadmium beta-BHC endrin chromium gamma-BHC endrin aldehyde copper chlordane heptachlor lead 4,4-DDD heptachlor epoxide mercury 4,4 DDE methoxychlor nickel 4,4-DDT toxaphene silver dieldrin C. Soil Screening Levels The need to develop a soil management plan should be based on USEPA generic soil screening levels (SSLs contained in Appendix A)for residential, commercial/industrial scenarios or other relevant screening levels. The attached SSLs are taken from EPA document OSWER 9355.4-24 December 2002 (Appendix A/ Exhibit A-1) (http://www.epa.gov/superfund/resources/soil/ssg_appa-c,pdo Most SSLs are attainable on Long Island but it is important nt to note that typical background levels of arsenic in non-agricultural soils in S < Suffolk County range from 1-4 ppm and may exceed the EPA SSL (unpublished SCDHS data and Sanok et at, 1995). Therefore, to account for natural or background arsenic concentrations in Suffolk County soils, it is recommended that a soil screening action level of 4 ppm be applied. (Phis level corresponds to a cancer risk of 1/100,000 according to the USEPA Generic SSL guidance document.) D. Soil Management Plan When a surficial soil sample or samples exceed an applicable SSL, analysis should be performed of the deeper samples to determine the vertical extent of the contamination. Based on these analyses, a soil management plan (SMP) that addresses the areas of elevated contamination should be developed and submitted to the municipality tyfor review and approval. An SMP should be designed to minimize or prevent dermal contact, • ingestion, or inhalation of contaminated soils by future site residents or workers, and be protective of ground and surface waters. An SMP should mitigate contamination so as to achieve SSLs, or get as close to SSLs as practicable. The SMP should be based upon contaminant concentrations detected in surficial and deeper samples and may include the collection and analysis of additional samples. Mitigation measures may include options such as: removal and proper off-site disposal of contaminated soils, vertical mixing, where it can be demonstrated that cleaner soils are present below the surface; on-site stockpiling, e.g., in landscape berms, and revegetation at a portion of the site that will remain as undeveloped open space (i.e., buffer areas, not playgrounds or ball fields). On-site burial in excavated areas, or disposal below paving or an impervious cap may also be considered, depending on contaminant concentrations, where potential groundwater and surface water impacts are not issues. Post remediation (end point) samples should be included as part of the SMP to demonstrate adequate reductions in soil concentrations. E. Confirmatory End Point Samples Post remediation/management samples should be collected in approximately the same locations as the initial elevated samples for contaminants of concern. Such samples should be collected and analyzed as specified in Sections A and B, above, or as specified in the approved SMP. Depending on initial contaminant concentrations, it may be possible to limit post SMP analysis to the specific contaminants identified in the initial sampling. Sampling of any soils to be brought onto the site may also be prudent to ensure the quality of the fill material. • APPENDIX A GENERIC SSLs FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL SCENARIOS This appendix provides generic SSLs for 109 chemicals under residential and non-residential (i.e.,commercial/industrial)exposure scenarios. Exhibit A-I presents updated generic SSLs for the residential exposure scenario. The generic SSLs for three of the pathways in this exhibit — inhalation of volatiles in outdoor air, inhalation of fugitive dust, and migration to ground water— were calculated using the same equations and default values for exposure assumptions found in the 1996 SSG(and reproduced in Appendix B of this document). However, they incorporate updated values for dispersion factors, for toxicity, and for other chemical-specific parameters presented in Appendix C. The exhibit also presents new SSLs for concurrent exposures via soil ingestion and dermal absorption that are based, in part, on a new quantitative approach for evaluating dermal absorption. SSLs for combined direct ingestion and dermal absorption exposures to contaminants were calculated according to the method described in Section 3.2.1 of this document. The generic residential SSLs in Exhibit A- 1supersede those published in the 1996 SSG. Exhibits A-2 and A-3 present commercial/industrial SSLs for the outdoor worker and indoor worker receptors,respectively. These SSLs have been calculated using the equations and the default values for exposure assumptions and other input parameters presented in Section 4.2.3 of this • guidance document. All generic SSLs presented in this appendix, both residential and commercial/industrial, are rounded to two significant figures,with the exception of values less than 10 mg/kg, which are rounded to one significant figure. As noted above, the values in this.Appendix are based on chemical-specific physical and toxicological parameters presented in Appendix C. The values in Appendix C represent the most recent values available and are current as of the date of publication of this guidance. However, physicaUchemical and toxicological data are subject to revision and should therefore be confirmed before referencing screening levels in the following tables. Trichloroethylene, in particular,is based on a draft risk assessment, and because the document is still undergoing review, the health benchmark values should be consideredP rovisional. EPA does not present generic SSLs for the construction exposure scenario because the complexity and variability of exposure conditions for construction activities precludes the development of such values. For information on developing SSLs for exposures during construction activities, users should refer to Chapter 5 or Appendix E of the guidance document. The generic residential and non-residential SSLs are not necessarily protective of all known human exposure pathways or ecological threats. Before applying SSLs, it is therefore necessary to compare the conceptual site model (developed in Step I of the soil screening process) with the assumptions underlying the generic SSLs to ensure that site conditions and exposure pathways are consistent with these assumptions (See Exhibit A-4.) If this comparison indicates that the site is more complex than the generic SSL scenario, or that there are significant exposure pathways not accounted for by the SSL scenario, then generic SSLs alone are not sufficient to evaluate the site, • and additional, more detailed site-specific investigation is necessary. A-1 In each exhibit, the first column presents SSLs based on the combined soil ingestion and dermal absorption exposure pathway. When data on dermal absorption from soil are unavailable, these SSLs are based on ingestion exposures only. SSLs for this pathway may be updated in the future as dermal absorption data become available for other contaminants. The second column in Exhibits A-1 and A-2resen p is SSLs for the outdoor inhalation of volatiles pathway. Although residential receptors and indoor workers are potentially exposed to volatiles in indoor air as well, EPA has not calculated generic SSLs for migration of volatiles into indoor air because it is very difficult to identify suitable standardized default values for inputs such as dimensions of commercial buildings and the distance between contamination and a building's foundation. EPA provides spreadsheet models that can be used to calculate SSLs for this pathway using the simple site-specific or detailed site-specific approaches.' The third column in Exhibit A-i and A-2 lists SSLs for the inhalation of fugitive dusts pathway. Because inhalation of fugitive dust is typically nota concern for organic compounds, SSLs for this pathway are presented only for inorganic compounds, which are listed at the end of-each exhibit. Conversely, with the exception of mercury,no SSLs for the inhalation of volatiles pathway are provided for inorganic compounds because these chemicals exhibit extremely low volatility. The user should note that several of the generic SSLs for the inhalation of volatiles pathway are determined by the chemical-specific soil saturation limit (C.) which is used to screen for the presence of non-aqueous phase liquids(NAPLs). As indicated in Section 4.2.3, in situations where • the residual concentration of a compound that is a liquid at ambient soil temperature exceeds Cp„ the compound may exist as free-phase liquid (see Exhibit C-3 in Appendix C for a list of those compounds present in liquid phase at typical ambient soil temperatures). In these cases, further investigation will be required. The final two columns in Exhibits A-t through A-3 present generic SSLs for the migration to ground water pathway. The generic commercial/industrial SSLs for this pathway are the same as those for residential use and are unchanged from the 1996 SSG. As discussed in Section 4.2.3, this approach protects potential potable ground water resources that may be present beneath sites with commercial/industrial uses and protects off-site residents who may ingest ground water contaminated by the site. The migration to ground water SSLs are back-calculated from an acceptable target soil leachate concentration using a dilution-attenuation factor(DAF). The first of the two columns of SSLs for this pathway presents levels calculated using a DAF of 20 to account for reductions in contaminant concentration due to natural processes occurring in the subsurface. The second column presents SSL values for the migration to ground water pathway calculated assuming a DAF of one (i.e.,no dilution or attenuation between the source and the receptor well). These levels should be used at sites where little or no dilution or attenuation of soil leachate concentrations is expected; this will be the case at sites with characteristics such as shallow water tables, fractured media, karst topography,or source size greater than 30 acres. _ The vapor intrusion spreadsheets can be found on EPA's web site at htt ://www.e a. ov/su erfund/ P P g P • programs/risk/airmodel/johnson_ettinger.htm. A-2 After all possible SSLs for all potential receptors at a site have been identified from the tables in Exhibits A-1 through A-3, the site manager should select the lowest applicable SSL for each exposure pathway to be used for comparison to site contaminant concentrations in soil. Generally, where the relevant SSL for a given pathway of concern is not exceeded, the user may eliminate the pathway from further investigation. If all pathways of concern are eliminated for an area of the site based on comparison with residential SSLs, that area can be eliminated from further investigation. However, if commercial/industrial SSLs are used in soil screening evaluations, elimination of an area from further consideration is contingent on an analysis of institutional control options. Users should consult Section 4.3.2 of the guidance document for more information. The final exhibit in this appendix(Exhibit A-4)presents the default values for physical site characteristics that are used in calculating SSLs(both residential and commercial/industrial) for the inhalation and migration to ground water pathways. These values describe the nature of the contaminant source area,the characteristics of site soil,meteorologic conditions, and hydrogeologic characteristics, and serve either as direct input parameters for SSL equations or as assumptions-for developing input parameters for the equations. This appendix does not include SSLs for lead, dioxin, or PCBs, because EPA has issued separate documents that specify risk-based concentrations for these contaminants in soil. For guidance on addressing soil contaminated with lead,dioxin, or PCBs,please refer to the following sources: Lead: • •• U.S. EPA, 1994. Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities, EPA/540/F-94/043, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.Directive 9355.4-12. • U.S. EPA, 1996. Recommendations of the Technical Review GVork ou or Lead for pf or I an Interim Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil, Technical Review Workgroup for Lead (TRW), Washington, D.C. •• US EPA, 1999. Frequently Asked Questions on the Adult Lead Model: Guidance Document. Technical Review Workgroup for Lead (TRW), Washington, D.C. http://www.epa.gov/ocrrpage/superfund/programs/lead/ adfags.htm A-3 • PCBs: US EPA, 1990. Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfimd Sites with PCB Contamination. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency nc Response, Washington, D. C. NTIS PB91- 2 2 � l 0GC1H. (Currently being updated by the EPA ?CD work group.) Dioxin: • U.S. EPA. 1998.Approach for Addressing Dioxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites. OSWER Directive 9200.4-26. • U.S. EPA. 2000. Draft Exposure and Human Health Reassessment oft,3,7,8- Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD) and Related Compounds. Office of Research and Development, Washington,D.C. EPA/600/P-00/OOiBg. September. Analysis of Effects of Source Size on Generic SSLs The generic SSLs presented have been developed assuming an infinite source and a 0.5 acre source size. For an analysis of the sensitivity of generic SSLs to changes in source size and the depths to which infinite source SSLs are protective at larger sites,please refer to Attachment A and • Table A-3 in the Technical Background Document of the 1996 SSG..Additional detail is also provided in the guidance documents specifically addressing screening levels for soils contaminated with lead, dioxin, or PCBs (listed above). • A-4 Exhibit AA • 1 GENERIC SSLs FOR RESIDENTIAL SCENARI04 Inhalation Inhalation of Migration to Ground Water Compound Ingestion- of Fugitive Organics Dermal Volatiles Particulates DAF=20 DAF=1 CAS No. (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mg/kg) Acenaphthene 83-32-9 3,400 Acetone(2-Propanone) 67-64-1 7,800 -- - i6 ° 0.8 Alddn 309-00-2 0.04 3 - 0.5 0.02 ° Anthracene 120-12-7 17.000 ° - - 12,000 590 Bem(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.6 - - 2 p 08 •. Benzene 71-43-2 12 `'` 0.8 - 0.03 Bema(b)8uoranthene 205-99-2 0.6 - - 5 02 •. Bemo(k)8uoranthene 207-08-9 6 Benzoic acid 65-85-0 310,000 °F - ` _ qpp • 20 k Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32.8 0.06 - - 8 0.4 KC-b,mle -chloroethyl)ether 117.44-4 DA 0.2 - 0.0004 0.00002 ° -ethylheuygphthalate 117-81-7 35 - - 3,600 180 odichlommethane 75-27-4 10 - - 0.6 0.03 oform(Mbromomethane) 75.25.2 01 L° 52 - 0.8 0.04 nol 71-36-3 J.800 °'` - - 77 ° 0.9 benzyl phthalate 85-68-7 12,000 - ` - 930 azole 86-74-8 24 - ` - 0.6 0.03 on.disulfide 75-15-0 7,800 720 ° - 32 ° 2daarbon etrachlodde 57--74-9 5 LO 720.07 0.0030.3 dane 57-74-9 2 72 - 0.5 oroan'rtine 106-47-8 240 - 0.7 ° 0.03obenzene 108-90-7 1,600 °'` 380 ° - 1 - 0.07 odibromomelhane 124-48-1 8 L° - - 0.4 0.02oform 67-66-3 700 0.6 0.03 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 310 - _- 4 °° 02 Chrysene 218-01-9 62 - - 160 ` 8 DDD 72-54-8 3 DDE 72-55.9 2 °° - - 54 3 DDT 50-29.3 2 - ° - 32 2 ` Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 53.70-3 0.06 °'' - •. - 2 0.08 Di-n-butyl phthalate 84-74-2 6,100 ° - ` - 2,300 ° 270 ° 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-5D-1 5,500 ° 600 ° - 17 0.9 7,4-Dichlombenzene 106-46-7 20 ` - ° - 2 0.1 3,3-DicNorobenzidine 91-94-1 1 ` - - 0.007 °'' 0.0003 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 7,800 1,200 ° - 23 ° 7 1,2-DicNoroethane 107-06-2 7 `'° 0.4 -- 0.02 0.001 1,1-Dichloroethylene 75-354 3900 °'` 290 ° - 0.06 0.003 os-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 780 °'` - - 0.4 0.02 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5 1,600 - - 0.7 0.03 2,4-Dichlorophenol 12D-83-2 180 ° - - 1 °A 0.05 ° 2,4-Dichlorophenoxy- 94-75-7 690 - - 0.4 „ 0.02 °r acetic acid 1,2-Dichloropmpane 78-07-5 9 15 ` - 0.03 0.001 ' 1 3-Dichloro r oene 542-75-6 6 " 7 - 0.004 0.0002 • A-5 • Exhibit A-1 (continued) GENERIC SSLs FOR RESIDENTIAL SCENARIO' Inhalation of Migration to Ground Water Compound Ingestion- Inhalation Fugitive Organics(continued) Dermal of Volatiles Particulates DAF=20 DAF=1 CAS No. (mglkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) {mglkg) (mg/kg) Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.04 1 - 0.004 0.0002 Diethyiphtbalate 84662 49,000 ° 2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 1,200 ° - - 9 0.4 ° 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 120 ° 0 2 °''x 0 008 2,4Dinitratoluene 121-142 0.7 - - 0.0008 0.00004 2,6-Dindratoluene 606-20.2 0.7 - - 0.0007 `'' 0.00003 Di-n-octyl phthalate 117-84-0 1,200 ° - -- 10.000 ° 10,000 ° Endosulfan 115-29-7 470 °'` - _ 18 b 0 9 ° Endrin 72-20-8 23 °'` - - 1 0.05 Elhylbenzene 100-41-64 7,800 °'` 400 ° - 13 0.7 Fluomnlhene 206440 20 30 ° - - 4,300 ° 210 ° Fluorene 86-73-7 2,30D ° - - 560 ° 28 ° Heptachlor 76-04-8 D.1 `'0 4 - 23 1 Heptachlor Epoxide 1024-57-3 O.D7 C° 5 - 0.7 0.03 Hexachlorobenzene 118-741 0.3 1 - 2 01 ' Hexarhloro-1,3-hutatliene 87-68-3 6 a - 2 0.1 o-HCH(a43HC) 319-84-6 0.1 "1 0.7 - 0.0005 `'' 0.00003 <' • 0-HCH -BHC) - 319-BS•7 0.4 c'° 6 c = 0-003 0,0001 y-HCH(Lindane) 5&89-9 0.4 0.009 0.0005 Hexachlomcyclopentadiene 7747-4 370 29 ° - 400 20 Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 35 54 ° - 0.5 0.02 °1 Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyrene 193.39-5 0.6 - - 14 0.7 ` Isophomne 78-59-1 510 - - 0.5 0.03 Methoxychlor 72-43-5 390 °c - - 160 8 Melhyl bromide 74-83-9 110 °'` 9 ° - 02 ° 0.01 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 85 ` 13 - 0.02 0.001 °• 2-Methyiphenol(o-cresol) 9548-7 3,100 - - 15 0.8 Naphthatene 91-20-3 1,100 ° 170 - 114 4 Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 31 90 ° - 0.1 0.007 N-Nllrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 99 -- - 1 0.06 N-Nilrosodi-n-propylamine 621-64-7 0.07 " - - 0.0000 0.000002 ` Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 3 - - 0.03 0.001 1` Phenol 108-95.2 18,000 --- - 100 ° 5 ° Pyrene 12MM 1,700 ° - - 4,200 ° 210 ° Styrene 10042-5 16.000 1,500 - 4 0.2 1,12,2-Tetrachloroelhone 79-345 3 " 0.6 9 - 0.003 " 0.0002 Telrachlomethylene 127-IBA 1 " 1 - 0.06 0.003 ' Toluene 10B-86-3 16,000 b.. 650 -- 12 0.6 Toxaphene 8001-35-2 0.6 " 87 - 31 2 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 610 ° 3,200 d - 5 0.3 1J,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 - 1,200 ° - 2 0.1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 11 1 • Trichloroethylene' 79-01-6 2 " 0.07 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-954 6,100 270 °i 14 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BB-062 A-6 Exhibit A-1 (continued) • GENERIC SSts FOR RESIDENTIAL SCENARIO' Inhalation Migration to Ground Water of Compound Ingestion- ;ho,.n Fugitive I Organics(continueo7 Dermal Particulates DAF=20 DAF=1 CAS No. (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mglkg) (mglkg) Urryl acetate 108-05-4 78.000 " — i7 ° 81lrnyl chloride(chloroelhene) 75-01-4 0.4 `°d — 0.01 'U 0.13007 " m-Xylene 10838-3 160.000 — 270 10 o-Xylene 95-47-6 160,000 — — 190 g p-Xylene 106-42-3 160,000 a` — 200 10 [Antimony organics 7440-36-0 31 °'c — — 5 0.3 Arsenic 744o-38-2 0.4 — 770 29 ° 1 k Barium 7440-39-3 5,500 a` — 710,000 ° 1.600 ° 82 " Beryllium 7440-41-7a. — 160 .7.400 6.3 ° 3 ° Cadmium 7440-43-9 70 ° -- 1,800 8 ° 0.4 ° rJCh um(total) 7440-47-3 230 °'` — 280 38 ° 2 ° um(III) 16065-83-1 120,000 a` — s um(VI) 185413-29.9 230 °'` — 280 38 ° 2 , (amenable) 57-12-5 1,600 °'` — — 40 2 Mercury - 7439-97-6 23 aai 1C '` — 2 0.1 ° Nickel 7440-02-0 1,600 °` — 14,000 130 7 ° Selenium 7782-49-2 390 °'` — 5 ` 0.3 k Silver 7440.22-4 390 °'` — — ` 34 .+ 2 °.`' • Thallfum 7440-28-0 6 a"" — • , — D-7 D.oa Vanadium 7440-62-2 550 -- — 6.000 ° 300 ° Zinc 1 7440-66- 2 00 °'` — — 12 000 a 620 e., DAF=Dilution Attenuation Factor ` Screening level based on human health criteria only Calculated values correspond to a noncancer hazard quotient of 1.For exposure 10 multiple non-carcinogens,EPA evaluates contaminants according to their critical effect.See section 2.3 for further discussion. ` Ingestion-Dermal pathway.no dermal absorption data available;calculated based on ingestion data only. Inhalation of volatiles pathway:no toxicity criteria available ° Soil Satumfion Urnft(Cast) Calculated values correspond to a cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000.For multiple carcinogens,EPA believes values will accumulate to be wilhfn acceptable risk levels.See section 2.3 for further discussion. ' Level is at or beIDW Contract Laboratory Program required quanlification limil for Regular Analytical Services(RAS) ° Chemical-specific properties are such that this pathway is not of concern at any soil contaminant concentration " SSL Is based an conlinuous exposure to vinyl chloride over a lifetime. ' SSL is based on continuous exposure to vinyl chloride during adulthood. SSL is based on dietary RID for Cadmium ' SSL for pH of 6.8 ' SSL is based on RID for mercuric chloride(CAS No.007847-94-7) ISI SSL 1s based on RID for thallium chloride(CAS No.7791-12-0) Health benchmark values are based on NCE4's Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment:Synthesis and Charactenzation- External Review Draft(ORD,August,2001).The trichloroethylene draft risk assessment is still under review. As a result,the health benchmark values are subject to change. i A-7 Exhibit A-2 GENERIC SSLs FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SCENARIO: OUTDOOR WORKER RECEPTOR° Inhalation of Migration to Ground Water Compound Ingestion- Inhalation Fugitive Dermal of Volatiles Particulates DAF=20 DAF--1 Organics CAS No. (mglkg) (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mg/kg) (mglkg) Acenaphthene 83-32-9 37,000 ° - - 570 ° 29 ° Acetone(2-Propanone) 67-647 170,000 °'` - -- 16 Aldrin 309-00-2 0.2 " 6 - 0.5 0.02 Anthracene 120-12-7 180,000 ° - - 12,000 ° 590 ° Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 2 - ` - 2 0.08 Benzene 7143-2 5B " 1 - 0.03 0.002 Benzo(b)Ouoranlhene 205-99-2 2 - -- 5 02 1 Semo(k)Ouoranthene 207-08-9 23 - - 49 2 Benzoic acid 65-85-0 1,000.000 °c` -- - 400 °a 20 °i Benzo(a)pymne 50-32-8 0.2 e - - a 0.4 Bis(2-cNoroethyl)elher 111-444 2 0.4 - O.00D4 ` 0.00002 Bis(2-ethylhexypphthalale 117-81-7 140 - - 3,600 180 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 51 ` - -- 0.6 0.03 6romoform 75-25-2 400 88 - 0.8 0.04 (Vlbromomethane) Butanol 71-36-3 110.000 °"` - -- 17 ° 09 ° • Butyl benzyl phthalate 85-68-7 140,000 e = = 930 ` 810 ° Carbazole 86-74-8 96 0.6 0.03 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 110,000 °< 720 - 32 ° 2 ° Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 24 °` 0.6 - 0.07 0.003 r Chlordane 57-74-9 7 120 - 10 0.5 p-Chloroadline 106-07-8 2.700 ° - - 0.7 ° 0.03 ONombenzene 108-90-7 23,000 540 - 1 0.07 Chlorodibromomethane 1244&1 38 " - - 0A 0.02 Chloroform 67,66-3 11,000 °` - -- 0.6 0.03 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 3,400 ° - ` - 4 02 Chrysene 218-01-9 230 - - 160 8 ODD 72-54-8 13 ` - ` - 16 0.8 DDE 72-55-9 9 `'` -- -- 54 3 DDT 50-29-3 B - ° - 32 2 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.2 Di-n-butyl phthalate 84-74-2 68,000 - - 2,300 ° 270 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 62,000 ° 600 ° - 17 0.9 1,4-Diddorahenzene 10646-7 BO 2 0.1 3,3-DVHorobenzidine 91-94-1 4 - - 0.007 `r 0.0003 1,1-DicNoroelhane 75-34-3 110,000 °A 1,700 ° - 23 1 ° 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06.2 35 0.6 ` - 0.02 0.001 1,1-OicNoroethylene 75-354 57,000 0 '0 410 ° - 0.06 0.003 cis-1.2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 11,000 °'` - - 0.4 0.02 Vans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5 23.000 °` - - 0.7 0.03 LA-Dichlomphenoxy- ,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 2.100 94-75-7 8.500 ° - - 0.4 °; 0.02cetic addc - .2-Dichloropropane 70-87-5 47 21 ° 0.03 0.001 ,3-Dichloropropene 542-75-6 32 " 2 - 0.004 0.0002 A-s I Exhibit A-2(continued) • GENERIC SSLs FOR COMMERCIAVINDUSTRIAL SCENARIO: OUTDOOR WORKER RECEPTOR' Inhalation Migration to Ground Water of Compound Ingestion- Inhalation Fugitive ' Dermal of Volatiles Particulates DAF=20 DAF=1 Organics(continued) CAS No. (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mglkg) Dieldrin 60-57-10.2 2 - 0.004 0.0002 Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 550.000 ° - - 470 23 ° 2,4-Dimethylphenol 10557-9 14,000 - - 9 ' 0.4 ° 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 1,400 ° - - 0.2 °'1 0.008 °'u 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 3 - - 0.0008 `f 0.00004 " 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 3 - -- OA007 " 0.00003 Di-n-actyl phthalate 117-84-0 14,000 - - 10.000 10,000 Endosulfan 115-29.7 6,800 ° - - 18 ° 0.9 ° - _ Endrin 72-20.8 340 1 0.05 Ethylhenzene 100-41-4 110,000 " 400 ° - 13 - 0.7 Ruaranlhene 206-04-0 24,000 ° - - 4,300 ° 210 ° Fluorene 86-73-7 24,000 ° - - 560 28 Heptachlor 76.44-8 0.7 7 - 23 1 Heptachlor Epoxide 102457-3 0.3 " 8 - 0.7 0.03 Hexachlorobenzene 118-741 1 c2 - 2 01 ' Hexachloro-l.3-butadiene 87-68-3 25 13 - 2 D 1 o-HCH(c-BHC) 319-84.8 0.5 1 - 0.0005 " 0-00003 i_HCH(' -BHC) 319-85-7 2 " - ° - 0.003 0.0001 " • y-HCH(L.ndane) 58-89-9 2 - - 0.009 0.0005 ' Hexachlorxyclopenladiene 1 77474 4,100 ° 41 - 400 20 Hexachloroelhane 67-72d 140 92 - - 05 002 " Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 193-39-5 2 - - 14 0.7 Isophorone 78-59-1 2,000 - -- 0.5 1 0.03 Melhoxychlor 7243-5 5.700 Methyl bromide 74-83-9 1.500 13 ' - 0.2 ° 0.01 °1 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 420 " 22 - 0.02 0.001 2-Methylphenal(o-cresta95-08-7 3 ) 4,000 ' - - 15 0.8 ° Naphthalene 91-20.3 12,000 240 ' - 84 ° 4 Nitrpbenzene 98-95-3 340 ° 130 ° - 0.1 °' 0.007 N-Nttrosodiphegylamine 8630$ 390 - - 1 0.06 " N-Nikosod-n-propylamine 621-54-7 0.3 - - 0.00005 'L' 0.000002 Penlachlorophenol 87-86-5 10 - - 0.03 °j 0.001 a Phenol108-95-2 210,000 ° - - 100 5 ° Pyrene 129-00-0 18.000 4.200 ' 210 ° Styrene 1OD42-5 230,000 °'` 1,500 ° - 4 0.2 1,1,22-Telrachloroelhane 79-34-5 16 1 - 0.003 " 0.0002 Tetrachloroelhylene 127.1&4 6 2 - 0.06 0.003 ' Toluene 106-88-3 230.000 °` 650 ° - 12 0.6 Toxaphene 8001-35-2 3 " 150 - 31 2 1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene f 120.82-1 6.800 3,200 - 5 0.3 ' 11,1-Trich1oroelhane 71-555 - 1,200 - 2 0.1 1,1.2-Trichioroethane 79-DO-5 56 2 - 0.02 0.0009 Trichloroethylene" 7MI-6 8 " 0.1 - 0.06 0.003 ' • 2,4,5-Trichlorophenot 95-954 68,000 ° _ ._ 270 •• 14 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 170 340 - 0.2 `° 0.008 A-9 Exhibit A-2(continued) GENERIC SSLs FOR COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL SCENARIO: OUTDOOR WORKER RECEPTOR' Inhalation Migration to Ground Water of Compound Ingestion- Inhalation Fugitive Dermal of Volatiles Particulates DAF=20 DAF=1 Organics(continued) CAS No. (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mgfkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Vinyl acetate 106-0511 1'00,000 °` 1,400 — 170 8 Vinyl chloride Ichlomethene) 75-01.4 4 ° 1 iA — 0.01 c"t 0.0007 m-Xylene 106-38-3 1,000,000 °e I — — 210 10 o­Xylene 95-47-6 1,000,000 °e -- — 190 9 p-Xylene 106-42-3 1,000,000 °'` — — 200 10 Inorganics Antimony 7440-36-0 450 — — !34 0.3 Arsenic 7440-36-2 2 1,400 ' 1 Barium 7440-39-379,000 °` — 1,000,000 ° 1 82 Beryllium 744041-7 2,300 — 2,600 3 Cadmium 744043-9 900 °J — 3,400 0.4 ' Chromium(total) 744047-3 3.400 — 510 ' 2 Chromium(III) 16065-83-1 1,000,000 — — ° — °Chromium(VI) 1854D-29-9 3,400 — 510 ' 2 'Cyanide(amenable) 57-72-5 23,000 ° -- — 2Merary 7439-97-5 340 °'" 14 " — i 0.1 'Nickel 7440-02-0 23,ODO °` — 26.000 t 7 'Selenium 778249-2 5,700 °'` 0.3 'Silver 7440-224 5,700 ° -- — °' 2 °J7440-28-0 91 °" — — 0.04 ' Vanadium 7440-62-2 7,900 ° — — 6,000 300 7 -66-6 34CIPOD — 12,000 °.I1 620 DAF=Dilution Attenuation Factor Screening level based on human health criteria only ° Calculated values correspond to a nom:ancer hazard quotient of 1.For exposure to multiple non-carcinogens,EPA evaluates contaminants according to(heir critical effect See section 2.3 for further discussion. Ingestion-Dermal pathway no demral absorption data available;calculated based on ingestion data only. Inhalation of votaliles pathway:no toxicity criteria available ' Soil Saturation Limit(Csaq Calculated values correspond to a cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000.For multiple carcinogens,EPA believes values will accumulate to be within acceptable risk levels.See section 2.3 for further discussion. ' Level is at or below Contract Laboratory Program required quantification limit for Regular Analytical Services(RAS) ° Chemical-specific properties are such that this pathway is not of concern at any soil contaminant concenlration ° SSL Is based on continuous exposure to vinyl chloride during adulthood. ' SSL is based on dietary RID for Cadmium ' SSL for pH of 6.8 ' SSL is based on RfD for mercuric chloride(CAS No.007847-94-7) ' SSL is based on RID for thallium chloride(CAS No.7791-12-0) ' Health benchmark values are based on NCFA's Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment.Synthesis and Charactenzation- Extemal Review Craft(ORD,August.2001).The Irichlomethylene draft risk,assessment is still under review. As a result,the health benchmark values are subject to change. I • A-10 Exhibit A-3 • GENERIC SSLs FOR COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL SCENARIO: INDOOR WORKER RECEPTOR` Migration to Ground Water Compound Ingestion-Dermal` DAF=20 DAF=1 Organics CAS No. (mg)kg) (mgfkg) (mgikg) Acenaphthene 83.32-9 120,000 ° 570 ° 29 ° Acelone(2-Propanone) 67-641 200,000 ° 16 ° 0.8 ° Aldrin 309-00-2 D.3 0.5 0,02 Anthracene 120-12-7 610,000 12,000 590 ° Benz(s)anthracene 56-55-3 B 2 0.08 °r Benzene 7143.2 100 ` 0.03 0.002 Benzo(b)8uorenthene 205-99-2 8 5 02 �. Berzo(k)8uoranthene 207-08-9 78 49 2 Benzoic acid 65-85-0 1,000,000 ° 400 °J 20 °+ Senzo(a)pyreae 50-32-8 0.8 B 0.4 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 111444 5 0.0004 0.00002 `•r Bis(2-efhy1hexy1)phthalate 117-81-7 410 ` 3,600 160 Bromodichloromethane 75274 92 0.6Rd BromofDrrn 75-25-2 720 0.8 (tri-bromomelhane) Butanol 71-36-3 200,000 17 ° Butyl beryl phthalate 85-68-7 410,0D0 ° 930 ° Carbazole 86-74-8 290 0.6Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 200,000 ° 32 ° Carbon tetracNoride 56-23-5 44 0.07 0.003 • Chlordane 57-749 16 - 10 0-5 p-Chloroanlline 1064745 8.200 0.7 ° 0.03 ° Chlombenzene 108-90-7 41,000 1 0.07 CNorodibromomelhane 12448-1 68 0.4 0.02 CNoroforrn 67-66-3 20.000 ° 0.6 0.03 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 10,000 4 0 2 ab Chrysene 218-01-9 780 ` 160 8 DDD 72-54-8 24 16 0.8 ` DDE 72-55-9 17 54 3 DDT 50-29-3 17 32 2 ° Dfbenz(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.8 2 Di-n-butyl phthalale 84742 200,000 ° 2,300 ° 270 1,2-DicNorobenzene 9550-1 180.000 ° 17 0.9 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 10646-7 240 2 01 3,3-Dictdorobenzidine 91-94-1 13 ` 0.007 0-0003 `j 1,1-Dirhloroelhane 75-34-3 200,000 ° 23 ° 1 ° - 1,2-Dichioroelhane 107-06-2 63 0.02 0.001 1,1-Dichforoethylene 75-354 100,000 ° 0.06 0.003 cis-1.2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 20,000 ° 0.4 0,02 L[2.4-Dichlorophenoxy- rans-l.2-Dichiorcethylene 156.611-5 41,000 ' 0.7 0.03 ,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83.2 6,100 0.05 94-75-7 20,000 , 0.4 ° 0.02cetic add • A-ll • Exhibit A-3(continued) GENERIC SSLs FOR COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL SCENARIO: INDOOR WORKER RECEPTOR' Migration to Gf ter CompoundIngestion-permal` DAF=20 F=1 Organics(continued) CAS No. (mglkg) (mglkg) g/kg) 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 84 0.03 0.001 ' 1,3-Dichlompropene 542-75-6 57 0.0D4 0.0002 ` Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.4 0.004 Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 1,000,000 470 23 2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 41,000 9 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 4,100 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 8 0.0008 " 0.00004 2.6-Dirdtrotoluene 606-20-2 8 0.0007 " 0.00003 Di-n-oclyl phthalate 117-84-0 41,000 10,000 ° 10,000 ° Endesullan 115-29-7 12,000 ° 18 0,9 ° Endrin 72-20-8 610 ° 1 0.05 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 200,000 ° 13 07 Ruoranthene 206A4-0 82,000 4,300 ° 210 ° Fluorene 86-73-7 82,000 560 ° 28 ' Heptachlor 76-44-B 1 23 1 Heptachlor Epoxide 1024-57-3 0.6 0.7 OA3 Hezachlorobenzene 118-74-1 4 2 0.1 ' Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 73 2 0_1 ' • • -HCH(•-BHC) 31944-6 0.9 0.0005 ''' 0.00003 '! HCH(--BHC) 319-85-7 3 0.003 0.0001 ••HCH(Undane) 58-89-9 4 0.009 0.0005 ' Hexachlorocydopentadiene 77-47-4 12,000 ° 400 20 Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 410 0.5 0.02 Indeno(1,2.3-cd)pyrene 193-39-57&59-1C)8 14 p 7 Isophorone 6.000 0.5 .03 Methoxychlor 72.43-5 10,000 ° 160 8 Methyl bromide 74-83-9 2,900 02 0.01 °1 Methylene chloride 75-09.2 760 0.02 0.001 '! 2-Melhylphenol(o-cresol) 9548-7 100.000 15 0.8 ° Naphthalene 91-20-3 41,000 84 ° 4 ° Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 1.000 0,1 °! 0.007 a� N-NBrosodiphenylamine 85-30-6 1,200 1 0.D6 <! N-Nilrosodi-n-propylamine 621-64-7 0.6 0.00005 " O.ODD002 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 48 0.03 '' 0.001 " Phenol 108-95-2 610,000 100 ° 5 Pyrene 129-0060 61,000 ° 4,200 210 ° Styrene 100-42-5 410,000 ° 4 0.2 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 29 0.003 " 0.0002 Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 11 0.05 0.003 ' Toluene 108-88-3 410,000 ° 12 0.6 Toxaphene 8001-35-2 5 - 31 2 1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 20,D00 ° 5 0.3 ' 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 - 2 01 • 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 100 0.02 0.0009 r Trichloroethylene" 14 0.06 0.003 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 200,000 ° 270 bj14 b! A-l2 Exhibit A-3(continued) • I GENERIC SSLs FOR COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL SCENARIO: INDOOR WORKER RECEPTOR` Migration to Ground Water Compound Ingestion-Dermal' DAF=20 DAF=1 Organics(continued) CAS No. (mgikg) (mg/kg) (mgikg) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06.2 520 •o 02 0.006 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 1,000,000 °'` 170 8 ° Vinyl chloride(chlomethene) 75-01-4 8 `•" 0.01 'ru 0.0007 m-Xylene 108-3&3 1,000,000 ° 210 10 o-Xylene 9547-6 1,000,000 ° 190 9 p-Xylene 10642-3 1.000,000 ` 200 10 Inorganics _ Antimony 7440.36-0 820 ° 5 0.3 Arsenic 7440-38-2 4 29 1 1 1 Barium 7440.39-3 140,000 ° 1,600 1 82 ' Beryllium 7440-41-7 4,100 ° 63 r 3 i Cadmium 7440-43-9 2,000 °'' 8 1 0.4 ' Chromium(total) 744047-3 6,100 ° 38 i 2 I Chromium(111) 16065-83-1 1,000,000 ° — Chromium(VI) 18540-29-9 6,100 ° 38 ' 2 Cyanide(amenable) 57-12.5 41,000 ` 40 2 Mercury 7439-97-6 670 '" 2 ' 0.1 1 Nickel 7440-02-0 41,000 ° 130 ' 7 r Selenium 778249.2 10,000 ° 5 ji 0.3 Silver 7440-224 10,000 34 ° 2 °j • _ . Thallium 7440-26.0 160 °' 0.7 1 0.04 Vanadium 7440-62-2 14,000 ° 6,000 ° 300 ° Zinc 7440.56.6 610,000 ° 12,000 °J 620 nj DAF=Dilution Attenuation Factor No dermal absorption data available for indoor worker receptor;calculated based on ingestion data only Screening level based on human health criteria only ° Calculated values correspond to a norcancer hazard quotient of 1 ` Ingestion-Dermal pathway:no dermal absorption data available;calculated based on ingestion data only. Inhalation of volatiles pathway:no toxicity criteria available ° Soil Saturation Limit(Csat) ' Calculated values correspond to a cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000 ' Level is at or below Contract Laboratory Program required quantification limit for Regular Analytical Services(RAS) ° Chemical-specific properties are such that this pathway is not of concern at any soil contaminant concentration " SSL is based on continuous exposure to vinyl chloride during adulthood. ' SSL is based on dietary RID for Cadmium 1 SSL for pH of 6.6 ` SSL is based on RID for mercuric chloride(CAS No.007847-94-7) ' SSL is based on RID for thallium chloride(CAS No.7791-12-0) Health benchmark values are based on NCEA's Trichloroathylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization-Extemal Review Draft(ORD,August,2001).The trichloroathylene draft risk assessment is stiff under review. As a result,the health benchmark values are subject to change. A-13 • Exhibit A-4 GENERIC SSLs: DEFAULT VALUES FOR PARAMETERS DESCRIBING SITE CONDITIONS- INHALATION AND MIGRATION TO GROUND WATER PATHWAYS SSL Pathway Migration to Ground Parameter Inhalation Water Method Source Characteristics Continuous vegetative cover • • 50 percent Roughness height • • OS cm for open ten ain;used to derive Di; Source area(A) OS acres(2,024m');used to derive L for GW Source length(L) • • 45 to(assumes square source) Source depth • • Extends to water table 0-e_,no attenuation in unsaturated zone) Soil Characteristics Soil texture Loanr,defines sail chaacteristics/parameters Dry soil bulk density(•e) 1.5 kg/L Soil porosity(n) 0.43 Vol.soil water content(0..) - 0.15 UNM;0.30(GW-,Indoor INH)* Vol.soil air content(a.) 0.28(•INH);0.13(GW;indoor INH)' Soil organic carbon(f,J 0.006(0.6°/x,INH);0.002(0.2%,GW) • Soil pH 6.8;used to determine•pH-specific r.,,(metals)and Ka,(ionizabit organics) Mode soil aggregate size . . 0.5 mm;used to derive U, Threshold windspecd Q 7 m (Ucr) - • 1132 rtJs Meteorological Data Mean annual windspeed(Um) -• 4.69 m/s(Minneapolis,MN) Air dispersion factor(Q,Q • • 90th percentile conterminous U.S. Volatilization Q/C •- 68.18;Los Angeles,CA;0.5-acre source Fugitive particulate Q/C • • 93.77;Minneapolis,MN;0.5-acre source Hydrogeologic Characteristics (DAF) Hydrogeologic setting • • Generic(national);surficial aquifer Dilution/atienuation factor(DAF) • • 20 or I ` • • Indicates parameters used directly in the SSL equations. • Indicates parameters/assumptions used to develop input parameters for SSL equations. INH=Inhalation pathway. GW=Migration to ground water pathway, Indoor INH=Inhalation of volatiles in indoor air pathway. ' The inhalation of volatiles in indoor air pathway is evaluated using subsurface soil defaults for 0..and 01. The model's default parameters assume contamination located directly beneath a basement floor that is two meters below the ground surface. A-14 Appendix B I Generic Guidance for Evaluating Surface Soils on Properties Being Converted to Residential or Public Uses' 1. Issues related to managing soils on a property should be evaluated in conjunction with engineering design issues related to water supplies, sewage disposal systems and erosion and dust control measures that might be affected by certain soil management options. 2. If a municipality determines that soil sampling is appropriate, NYSDOH suggests that the municipality advise the applicant to collect soil samples from the surface to a depth of two or three inches, to represent potential exposures to soil contaminants when children play in and incidentally ingest soil. If contaminant levels in surface soil exceed Soil Screening Levelsandbackground ranges, the applicant should prepare a soil management plan (SMP) to address the areas of elevated contamination. The scope of a SMP is related to the goals of the developer, the nature of the site and the extent of elevated levels, but does not necessarily involve the removal of material from the site. Six-inch deep soil samples can be collected at the same time as the surface samples, saving the bottom interval of the samples for analysis pending the results of the surface samples. Analytical results from this second interval are • often useful for determining the vertical extent of contamination and for evaluating various options proposed by the developer or his agent for addressing areas with elevated contaminant levels during the normal course of on-site activities. In addition, the results from the upper and lower intervals can be combined to reflect the potential for exposure to contaminated soils during gardening activities. 3. If the municipality determines that sampling is appropriate, they may want the sampling plan to take into account the proposed development plan and the likely mechanism of exposure (e.g., gardening, children playing, etc.). Initial sampling efforts should be focused on areas that are likely to have accumulated the highest contaminant levels (such as suspected pesticide mixing areas) and that reflect the areas that are most likely to be frequented by children once the development is complete (such as residential yards, play areas and common areas). Collecting samples from areas that are proposed to be paved over or from which soil is intended to be removed to establish final grades is less important. Similarly, sampling can be less important in areas that will be under building, driveways, parking lots or other features that make it unlikely that young children could come into contact with these soils. However, notification mechanisms such as deed restrictions may be appropriate for these areas, if left unsampled or if contamination is not addressed, to prevent excavation of contaminated soils during future construction or maintenance activities. • Page 2 4 If the municipality determines that sampling is appropriate, they may want to consider having the samples analyzed for lead, arsenic and DDT and its metabolites, because these were widely used and are persistent. it is appropriate to substitute or supplement these analyses based on the extent of knowledge of the property and its potential past uses on the part of the landowner or developer_ Samples should be analyzed by a laboratory that is certified through the State Health Department's Environmental Laboratory Approval Program (ELAP), or the National Environmental Approval Program (NELAP). 5. If the municipality determines that sampling is appropriate, it is recommended that discrete samples, rather than composite samples, be collected. Compositing samples from a large area or from disparate areas makes interpreting the results more difficult. This difficulty is increased as the number of locations composited into a single sample is increased and as the locations composited are further apart. Guidance based on recommendations from New York State De artment o' Health Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment—April 14, 1995 p ZOOOO > g nzmm OONZAPZ-SN V M u °£ ,£0'LSZ $T N56.00' 0"E O.<moD po223"0 L,8l.OSN n 14 8' W I yWC-co r_r M" o A W a'^C z 0 9 M �1.� ,. �%' pi ri q Ci E -3P.8 6£N l c I / o' Om m i ° m O L ¢ m � \ (14 03301 p1. 6£N zS�A y *�E I �'� L k ,'4axy° " � v mg _ - - C rOrr425 Cn � � 9 .� D`i Fzro r La Z. I` I.e r.�..' ,L N ONl `b8 Z9S ♦♦ • ZOy?.o L' zoom n a L1 M zEDA O M :/0 - yPq C . �. + ' 8 > Y >OO .a '�y955• I B I N N C�iZ BRIDLE LANE °=N. o o ri M • ..•,� e D i L M m P�8 r?. � e •� +L C= o > It Est nn ^b m \ @ dIL n o`er < t v �> X v K cam y00 asp Ln -n g m " 5O$° 0 v) n m Jrt Cl r:, e e" Z GD P$ M oz z_ D A M . Z F m o < 00 F Ovniov)- ,L 'z 99 LZ M,OZ;SSZ (0330) ' LS•LLZ F M„OZ,SSZSS 6 m D Z £ ?I � 1 • • v; A A � see n Vol I z y n .p b 8 yl� _ x .e � e\ o���L 1y,�g,a � �� Y• D r R mox OZOm 5p p M ��y /�•�II`� O \ �LL +'' - '• �j a � e �° °° � � I FOT O S n�Z a O uagnd v _ ° ° ? DO m D -z � O p ' n ���1° JP8• P$ z �m o m I \ t La + �9 D Fm T� any ++ ' � ® O r MZ x AA P$e® c a \ $ kd 6J � - F'++++I px a n G S 13 00 It Q1�,°E N N �' `�J)"C♦y / `� ° po°6°P°A yr ' Wm -1 L � '���� SPUR > e ,a"se o „ Can) _I g L ? � A ZQ II- N - n ,11I-IIIM L m Z Zio _ S IFII 1 1_I F. rn m 3 *� \ mz t • L p 0£ 14.8£ _ f. � g 553'05'40"W D =11111 111 OC © �7 M azs I--III ��L � m _ / f I. 0o "z 00 _ \ " rm III-III-1 m 09.2 o e w O -III- oo D \ �� / `, - $o< f \ xa n • r ` n, �' N O - rrj) =IlID ; g R=-1 \ ,,1 g ;� "�' Ae A F I •� z e Bio mnt�. O N D r (S N CW �iG I "^Pn ATl py ' NOr I OM 8. O Tz zFaw .me K03310 00' M, Nda .M"OZ.SS:ZSS, =m.: HOUSE LANE ;f KiV61py) ',LS'9LZM"OZ;SS Z` S SCHOOL - (0330) .!TLtZ M•,OZ,SSZSS Prw r♦+Yz wa + + + U o°vvv , O _ > a a + + vvvvv L7 -n co�n � Flmv mm dad • +++ + 000 oavoo > og�o Nzn� ++ 00 vavvv o �'I o r ZZC mia aaa + + vt°vvv - fDWOia6o-a2 << aaa ++' 000 omoov Z ' s ipF...;n o aaa +++++ 000 vt°vvv ° 4,; rn g 1� r7r aaOA> mnr n O<ry 0 D NOrmOZ M 2 RM D 4f/1�-I cm0 <m <m �ff<S5T Gf•1 < O <p < <<m R7 O m 1/1 i,Aj� FNR1 0Z 00 OmAO OtK'1 OrAZ FC OxinZ OpZ rl1.1 Onz -I f m m y Oa Nr ��- �G Z<D SA i< �mD �^ 3 <D 2 -^� i � zAw oo c< m09 my m�s m^=, m= mwz m,�' myz () O Fo((( imQ rn =oDon oo 00 �T oz o > oo �za ((OO����� y AU; TQ T .�.Ir O lm.ImL 00V NO 0m o(O�O OD �D0 800 8z 000 OO Oz sim � In Q i T mO pmT �� z0 ?r� y0 y0'J -ZIO -ZIO -ZIy :3 _Z-q -Zlm'J 00� Eg FI "p nm0- 0 0 O Rl CA zi am� -� m" iz ;z: zir ;" ;_: � F as_� io www yx D rn sg r C vzoc or, n o o o a 0 = Q yi ragar^ mi ap Bz aiA nz ii aF az ioA aF Az �'-"' 0 m O Sao M r m m � omN zm -' zm o a ym �� �yr1z � Ai 1��n in w`n ? r�* a>> 3 D O = mO�� mam V<0j ; NNW �0 pa OZ 0o onw Om O0� wW� O Q,pb � Z n r O T z n N A N n V Z N O Z 0 y D N F7r ,3 AK n 0a o0 00 05 00 oy o 0o TTT y� Ino n =g c) >N 111 7 Z s �mzo�a r5c o !ya '•no '"o n ro rz ra ro N�r� z u o IM m zI�}� ^ fQ JC m T-A m r� rm r r 0 1A ND top !!gym \x0 L, fl 1N" 7 M 0 `! m },7 m `s�o �?;m oA A r F a r m a .1yo y ;n w Z o A00 �' mm > z z M N z a C<] o o w O mN o C0 Q > (� u ?O NO T s z D a m n cz i A TON 63 ° a T N A y " OAS Zmy p a .T 0 z a 110 T O m p%a 111 C m1Or�y TI'I n CNI m ''O 10/1 m VlM o 'L mON •2V N O m 111 T� O -mIN N mN N> WT b O� NO VD m �' � y N D �6C Vy O O y O--1 1- O m m m N m A Of m Z 0 9 O 10 W t0 r ° lam O • TK -I O O On OD O O 00 OZ O TW m 0 906 p9 N C n (Y OM n1•'O A n n 00 6 Nn D C pm0 NO =1 9EN C j < Ka KD K < K < ;< T n r n.u3 Z T O ntr3 m §.x 0 z cu3 �� 8 ao C W7� pO pE y 'I a °n e N m w z 0me ay M � FIN a�°000 G:\projectMOD0261dwg\SITE100026SP.dwg,9/10/2008 2:02:47 PM,dsinger Appendix F-1 Groundwater Analysis Casola Well Drilling March 22, 2002 • 'CAST fi A WELL DRILLERS WRL CEKTIFICATE County ------------- 3uftotki BOH e WPOO3�146967 ownp Charles Kuehn InvoleeeJoba Aaaraae - 27163 3 East Deer Perk A.aad mai-ts 283 Emotion of WeR I;az Hiller NY I1740 t:lb Gr41f£it�A Stroe# 3 S.chaoi Noo,ez Lane n e DOMM01walt.g�eK,g�� / Main Road Cutchogue W—,Oramar yVo14. ine;y) �tthizty) 6 ` Egfray} Obewmetogeode sy"an+ tAas MOWN At" M rrp tiiHanieea.rmn yen 87 Marano! se#geiefq �'"` Sialnre"Steel I@ 105101 Diqpmftr 6" 3r- '-10' Depth b Top from Ca" Ylald t Ml jwwln 10 ` Dtemeler t^"1%" IMNartat AMke 011 Orett0eburo OeWn of Lateral Minbnum 94' I DRDT Olameter Length Malariai Ggkmnitetf PUMP LLRD Type Maoa srPA16 s.bG[at MoAef NuintfeY' Sko �, BM o"Od Power f ly at 20 pa TANKiNSTALLE MOO Sbr Rim Tyt Woawea.. G Method ofDn11Mq Illsaioa*fM%e"q C MO T001 chlerme"C" Type of water Tfestmaa �aee•' ! IaTeotwell .+ !w ,l$ I It lilt h p .1 it- 1 � A- � A s,r a a �IMF I Ita �c�► � ��'mak/, I ' - - ---- ----- ---- ------ K tAM9 fly 6l660tl1btgr�Nr,17p -�:du166r664. 6aalaanOt1w10n6 - FAMIROAD OloF f-.6R1fLgIr.Tf&AN�i Lry MO. t a ]� 6 MM011116g6n.. MIITTRUCtr1w s40w.... Tne : Po1M4w6Mr 1 / '-ARaTs : --891:20S.iBlD 0*10'PAW WON RDv*W :twn1lD 2M1 MMM c CAaOLA W2iL DRILUND CO6Pt]w :2r1M I at"AM PM N*; ORPFRM LAN6AMHDGM SOL CE(1y U CWNICNW DI :CURtawR Cosh To -.CLWcr M Fes! Anshnd t1 lk�ul4 1�1p Llml 11111�1AI�b1t Dlehkq Og1MS1Mo <03 MR- 6 E,SM2.2• 8440!P271/PM COb1orOMoM <0.6 MOA S ESM.2 NUM P.47:27 PM vi"rr Oft cpp- POA 2 .Fate; 3RMOt a2r,27PM., 0101MNrIbM <0.6 *VL 6 ES02.2 244000"I.."PM CBIOMMOMPS t 46 At S 660212 7R4M saT:v PM TA0400011MMrMOtnr <OA IMA 1! E602.2 24402 P27:27 PM t,t-DIOMMWW,0 e46 k$Dk 6 ES02,? WNW WUM PM MMOVAMS M11ttN0 <Qa MOL S E5022 24&42 027 27 PM brr.lygeRlasrPyNr 10.5 W6. 5 6502.2 344M282727 PM 1.4aklima�OuM <6.6 MOA S 8602.2 . W MM2P2FZ7PM c1n1,211kh�aa0mw t o's 1100& 6 El02.2 6a4Mt 0:27:17 PM 1.2'OlemaOProps" <0.8 WA 3 6607.2 aroma 9:27:27 P01 BMnadMRmMUMPS 40.6 PDA 6 to= vim SIM PM CBINsfam c 0.0 MOIL 60 6602.2 24100202727 PM 1,1.%-TAMwaM6N 10.6 MA 6 E802.2 V24M P2727 PM fiM0061P090NOt10O <O.S WA 5 96023 31SMt1Z k2T27►M \� 1.14AMWOPO" <Dd at 6 E6022 74/00292797 PM 1.*.O"ftm$vww c411.6 Is& 6 60022 3014OEt2T.27PM TAC2NN9R9M sO.S WA 5 ESM.2 324012M PM 12-camwepapa" <OA. MOA 6 6902.2 771N02127R+PM ORMM EMPOOM <OA at 6 F502.2 2000002 P.27.27 PM 11b1►I,2.OkINitOOeOPOM <0.8 MA 6 emu 211000!O.WW PM 71rr1 61MdM0e M 4:" MA 5 660¢.2 71100020:27:77 P4/ 1.112�TdahlNaMrn 10.6 W& a 6602.2 30M 2.17:27 PM T9PPd6or0MMM 40A WA 5 . E90R.2 Y2MOR MW PM 1.7 OkMg90gpM c03 MA S 6W7.2 641002[27.77 PM C610r090rO1O9 c4S. WA 9. 60022 244 "7:2?PIN 1.1.1.2 TObOdOpo00h1w9 <D.8 wt S am" 220002 k2727 PM RRIIIOLOMI61 c 0.5 W& 6 ESM2 6411at V.MV PM 1.1,Z,a.Tw1/h1o1aMMM 46.5 WL 5 6002.2 74NP1 k2P.T7 PM 13.YTIIM0p1M1e0w <46 MIL 5 EMA YM w ka7.27 PM 2�BRtMMOOPO 40.6 WL a ema 6/11102k2727PM 4GAOt910M1sa0 <O.6 PW- 6 EM02.2 24400212797 PM 1 t.2-0INN1o01Mtn60 40.9 VOL 9 8606.2 2/20102 P27.27 PM 1,Yg01019PP6e060 c 0A M9A 9 ESM.2 NUM 127:27 PM 1.40"1PNpIttMnO <0.6 191E 6 E302.2 2/20002 k2T27 PU 114,.2-?�OeOMnOMeM 40.6 WQ 6 601112 yam W-Mv PM <46 MA 6 ESM.2 Y24M P27=PM H,�'Y`Tdl®MMO'iw <aa PISA 1 E602.2 Y2N026:7P.27 PM w'�'�iy6n6'P w�;,Ne e�rt+.a►. u�..t.r: ... /�,.�,� 09r R9P011t6: w1m LsborMsry M1ta0607 Pp91912 UMMO ING ' 01661w11e0M11kel eM1Y10f 1100 pB�ID.PJO IJP.b0112J0MMs1 LJ�AA3Y2RY12R31dLTg , NMIRY CMD"J7AMR TISTOak LAO NO. : OZOattS-0O?A 6�i kdnna110n... N"A"D rm : PWAM WM61 `! MAThym66 w 14000 CNpn:Pow V" FONM N7 016M ID.:DABDLA{JELL DRUM Cefubd ,IzwnpIp'JOO2e ROk1 No: OWFW LAME,CVICM=a SWMRWELL 1boomw :IB9OIr1,*Om1M IaMMM' NlAOl17AWa6DPIDN011M1. 0etechd" :CWTURW% COOn To :CL1611T P IU 600Yt1 NO J1tt AO16tlA, *&a W& 6 age" 3J24902 0:27:37 PMI 7eOtlnO 40.0 JO% 6 61033 30002 6.27:27 PM _ _ EOnIOAsua a OA D01. 9' FMA 3MM W.27:27 Pa nIPx710ne <09 VIw 5 E60.2. • •.y0W10�M7POR , edION/M 4 U VIOL 6 EBOE2 2002 0aT47 PM awom •03 101. 6 E9023 3001070^!.•71.27 PM It"Xombo"m <0.5 mt 6 W02.2 304026.27WPM n-Pg1Nbs:c�or <6A WOL 6 6002.2 204064371.27 PM 1,3Shinrt11 ales 40A igi s E602.2 W240020:27:27 PM 41:00'1 a0JA1l71OwN x as Not 3o Em.2 arm=WPM PM .0e ML s !6023 2178000:22:27 PM IA4.T*mw *www* s 0.s VOL s E602.2 Nam 6371127 PM *OteprWAOI mw 66.6 001E 6 E602.7 376472 t7737 PM w67ioybvmx . <43 vole s e6Di2 WHO 1:27127 PM �- 4 as OWL a E602.2 301102 6271.27 PM AMkwbaw*Ao t7A POLL E66i.1 3R910EIlATOOPM IWIMMdpeMq «O VOL E621.1 90710E MOM M FM A101aA 2'10 lot EMA 3FMM 11:17.00 PM TaWAMM" 41.0 J.K- T COSA Nam 11:71!.10 PM t"MW x10..12 VOOtL 1.7 t=T 3FAM 1MMMAM '.. r kOn • 031 a6A. 03 6900,7 272010E 1a70:M AM Wlyna00 x0.11 WOOL s.9 625LT W21M I*;.2000AM Me 132 m04 s 6100.7 9J7M0I MUM AM L•W <9.1 19L is FMO.O 9170102 SZOMPM TMN C001OOn WIDW)m MyMM M0273 312300211:20110AM AJNWAM OMr•0 AOMM KOM 3QL!'JQ 11:2060 JIM Gde11d• 6.6 •104 200 E3253 2170602 II:U0:s2 AM 7 +8poletia6tldrsNgl 137 W*DWCM 112sfse 32M tiO:OOPM Jl( MCA6 Sacs 140L E421.1 MIOU&16.ro6AM 7oedke�6ya�0 =316 AOL EWA 2177!02e:0*82Pke werusa 2AD "IS& /o em.2 b7wm"r17PM .6.8 PNU1M e160.1 347102RNMPM Yf ••/ >is p�aleK: 4MOM MMI�e7 Pe0.2 0►2 t "ileenerks: EX44t-tag well ola ei", •TORPH TANK: _lnslaa.euuorlM ,. VINYL Typo of Tank Drain NO"CONNECTION NOSSRra Oaupa Installed YES Shut-oft Valve prior to tank YES Remount;Top Proviood YES Shut aH Valve with Sleodor Line YES Installed on outflow of tank t Cheek the Town In vrhleh the proleel H 100111ed: No►�Cnungn Q7 Hsmp�laed ❑North Hempstead ❑Oyster Bay BtrMOMt CoutHyf 6111obylon 0 Brookhaven 0 East Hampton C1Huntiraton 171skp ORWerhesd OShoWIsiond OlamNMown GBouthamplon Mouthold Care Completed ON" Driller Lic Number 73 , as • Appendix F-2 BURBS Model Existing Site Conditions I • • BURBS CALCULATION SHEET EXISTING SITE • • • Welcome to BURBS A Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet for calculating the impact of residential development on the nitrate concentration in groundwater. «« Center for Environmental Research Cornell University»» Ithaca, N.Y. 1985 There are 9 pages: A B C D E F G H I J 1 +---------------------------------------------+ Press the "Alt" I Welcome I Instructions I Definitions I key with one I (you are here)I <Alt> 1 1 (3 pages) I letter 20 +--------------+---------------+ <Alt> D I to switch I Parameters I Results I I sections. I <Alt> P I <Alt> R I I 40 +---------------+---------------+ I I Calculations 1 I I Special I <Alt> C I I 1 Commands: 60 +-------------+ +--------------+ <Alt>W = results + parameters on split screen I Bibliography I <Alt> U = undo split screen <Alt> G =graphs +----<Alt> B----+ DATA- Enter a values for each parameter: 1. Fraction of land in turf 0.00 fraction 2. Fraction of land which is impervious 0.00 fraction 3. Average persons per dwelling 0.00 people 4. Housing density 0.00 dwellings/acre 5. Precipitation rate 44.00 inches/year 6. Water recharged from turf 22.00 inches/year 7. Water recharged from natural land 22.00 inches/year 8. Evaporation from impervious surface 0.10 fraction 9. Runoff from impervious recharged 0.00 fraction 10. Home water use per person 0.00 gallons/day 11. Nitrogen concentration in precip. 0.10 mg/1 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used 0.30 mg/I 13. Turf fertilization rate 0.00 lbs/1000 sq ft 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf 0.50 fraction 15. Fraction of wastewater N lost as gas 0.50 fraction 16. Wastewater fraction removed by Sewer 0.00 fraction 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater 100.00 lbs/year 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land 0.95 fraction INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS Fraction Natural Land 1.00 Population Density 0.00 people/acre Nitrogen addition from precipitation 1.00 lbs/acre/year N content of wastewater incl.water used 100.00 lbs/person/year • LABELS FOR GRAPH • Overall Turf Nitrate Natural Conc. _ Sewage 0.0 Runoff mg /liter TOTAL MACRO COMMANDS {goto}a 1- {goto}a1- {goto}d21- {goto}a21- {goto}a29- {home}{goto}a21-- /wwh-- {goto}b23- /wwu- {window} {goto}a1- {goto}d22- {goto}d 1- {window}{goto}b23- {goto}a1- /wwc- {goto}j 1- {home}- ' {goto}a1- /gnu {goto}j61- {goto}a 1- • {goto}a41- • • INSTRUCTIONS It is assumed that you already know how-to-use Lotus 1-2-3. This 1-2-3 spreadsheet is set up to calculate the amount of water and nitrogen which will be recharged from a residential development. It calculates loadings from wastewater, turf, natural land and runoff from impervious surfaces. You must enter values for all the parameters on the data page which starts in cell A21. These parameters are defined and discussed on the page to right of this one. -----> If you are uncertain of the appropriate value to use for a parameter,we suggest that you try several values in the range of possible values. The numerical output from this model is only as accurate as the parameters and assumptions and hence should be interpreted carefully. There are several predefined graphs which you can use. This software is free to all owners of Lotus 1-2-3 and carries no guarantee. RESULTS: WATER RECHARGE NITROGEN LEACHED --------------- --------------- inches/yr r percent nt lbs/acre/yr yr percent • Turf 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Natural Land 22.0 100% 0.0 100% Wastewater 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Impervious Runoff 0.0 0% 0.0 0% TOTAL 22.0 0.0 Nitrogen concentration in recharge 0.0 mg/I Graphs of the data can be accessed by typing<Alt> G. Select a graph, then type M"to exit graph menu. • Parameter Definitions • - -- -- -- --- ------- 1. Fraction of land in turf- refers to area maintaned as lawn, must be between 0 and 1. 2. Fraction of land which is impervious -sum of roof area, driveways and roads; must be between 0 and 1. The fraction of land in natural vegetation is computed as 1 minus the sum of fraction in turf and the fraction impervious, thus the sum of these 2 must be less than 1. 3. Average persons per dwelling-the average number of people living in each house or dwelling unit. 4. Housing density-the number of dwelling units per acre. 5. Precipitation rate -the annual average precipitation in inches. 6. Water recharged from turf-the amount of water per unit area of turf which drains to groundwater. This can be computed from a water budget for the root zone. A 1-2-3 spreadsheet is available for this. [1] 7. Water recharged from natural land -the amount of water per unit area of natural of natural vegetation which drains to groundwater. This can be computed from a water budget. 8. Evaporation from impervious surface-the fraction of precipitation falling on impervious surface assumed to evaporate. Try 0.10. [1] 9. Runoff from impervious recharged -The fraction of the runoff which is recharged through recharge basins, ponds etc. Evaporation is subtracted. Use 0 here if storm sewers drain all runoff to surface waters. 10.Water use per person-average in-home use of water. Try 44 gallons • per person per day. [2] 11. Nitrogen concentration in precipitation-average concentration, Use data from closest weather station where nitrogen tests were done. 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used -average concentration in water used in homes. 13. Turf fertilization rate -average yearly nitrogen application rate expected for residential turf. 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf-the fraction of nitrogen applied from fertilizer. precipitation reci itation etc. which leaches to PP groundwater. For sandy soil try 0.35 if clippings are removed, or try 0.5 if clippings are left on turf.These values are based on Long Island studies [3],[4]. For tighter soils the fraction leached will probably be less. 15. Fraction of Wastewater N lost as gas -fraction of nitrogen in wastewater which volatilizes or is converted to gaseous N through denitrification. Roughly 0.50 under Long Island, N.Y. conditions.[5] This value is dependent on temperature and soil. Warmer areas will probably have higher fractions volatilized as will areas with tighter soils. Colder areas will probably have lower fractions. Vary this widely in your sensitivity analysis. (Perhaps 0.2 to 0.8) 16. Fraction of wastewater removed by sewer-efficiency of sewer. Try 0.90 which is to assume that 10%exfiltrates from sewers. If no sewers are present use 0. [4] • 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater-the average in the U.S. is 10 lbs/person/day. [2] 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land -the fraction of nitrogen in precipitation which is removed by natural land before the water is • recharged. Should be at least 90 percent. BIBLIOGRAPHY [1] Mather, John R. 1979. The Influence of Land-Use Change on Water Resources.Water Resources Center, University of Delaware. Newark, Delaware. [2] Long Island Regional Planning Board. 1978. Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 study). Hauppauge, N.Y. [3] Hughes, Henry B.F. and K.S. Porter. 1983. Land Use and Ground Water Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton. Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [4] Hughes, Henry B.F., J. Pike and K.S. Porter. 1985.Assessment of Ground-Water Contamination by Nitrogen and Synthetic Organics in Two Water Districts in Nassau County, N.Y. Centerfor Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [5]Andreoli, A., R. Reynolds, N. Bartilucci and R. Forgione. 1977. Pilot Plant Study: Nitrogen Removal in a Modified Residential Subsurface Disposal System. Suffolk County Department of Health • Services, Hauppauge, N.Y. • A rt0i' v ,4t`31'✓'e�P'{�'� " �s^ '+5y' CKIRV kse¢iw'nxu r x t t ya a :. e i :5. "YuC'yEl- � 1 t w a aff `� M-2 ,K c w e .j x.* 'i 4 J,rr' 7 J s " ,✓Meaat^dceC �w14'�1 "u e we1 ( 11 i Y hx 3 fl k+ r 4 4W f'T 'i. A tMs wymp a, wa .......:.... in qpq *+ 2• xx ti a J ' r e a'r .£i y"o-ua 's�, Yp a$rr+ yh 0a, Sol.—i k qv C Y y4 1 [ � Mel +y M � P 1 x 41 J � M wav i #' a etrt j f ixu s; t > 1V.0042s> s °i t t '- 1 4R t^,"iyy s �15Sa.Yryti: "ti ���r '3 ,t �aw a k f �, _ y, _ Ic F*.�"N'.c'�k''�'`7�i+ t�`�°?dy��Z+ym�W•� ^ Y -N R Pr 1 ip gi�i6 Ogg< �A r ' SLz �k.xy 1 **n ... "".ds.w^ +..u+ .;.._r ., ' "`� h h � NP— M, c ,r H' iGYs A .... , =...aa..� s"` v �' �ee'3'n" .. G ............. Appendix F-3 BURBS Model Proposed Project • • BURBS CALCULATION SHEET PROPOSED PROJECT • • Heritage @ Cutchogue - Proposed INSTRUCTIONS It is assumed that you already know how to use Lotus 1-2-3. This 1-2-3 spreadsheet is set up to calculate the amount of water and nitrogen which will be recharged from a residential development. It calculates loadings from wastewater, turf, natural land and runoff from impervious surfaces. You must enter values for all the parameters on the data page whi starts in cell A21. These parameters are defined and discussed on th page to right of this one. ----> If you are uncertain of the appropriate value to use for a parameter,we suggest that you try several values in the range of possible values. The numerical output from this model is only as accurate as the parameters and assumptions and hence should be interpreted carefully. There are several predefined graphs which you can use. This software is free to all owners of Lotus 1-2-3 and carries no guarantee. • • Heritage @ Cutchogue-Proposed Welcome to BURBS • ------------- A Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet for calculating the impact of residential development on the nitrate concentration in groundwater. «« Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University»» Ithaca, N.Y. 1985 There are 9 pages: A B C D E F G H I J Press the"Alf' I Welcome I Instructions I Definitions I key with one I (you are here)I <Alt> 1 1 (3 pages) I letter 20+_-____+____-__-__+ <Alt> D 1 to switch I Parameters I Results I sections. I <Alt> P I <Alt> R I I 40 + --- -+- ----+ I Calculations I I Special I <Alt> C 1 I Commands: 60 +---------__+ <Alt>W = results+ parameters on split screen 1 Bibliography I <Alt> U = undo split screen <Alt>G=graphs +_-_<Alt> B-+ DATA- Enter a value for each parameter: Area of site 45.99 acres 1. Fraction of land in turf 0.52 fraction 2. Fraction of land which is impervious 0.48 fraction 3.Average persons per building 1.95 people 4. Building density 3.02 units/acre • 5. Precipitation rate 44.00 inches/year 6. Water recharged from turf 22.00 inches/year 7. Water recharged from natural land 22.00 inches/year 8. Evaporation from impervious surface 0.10 fraction 9. Runoff from impervious recharged 1.00 fraction 10. Water use per person 79.76 gallons/day 11. Nitrogen concentration in precip. 1.00 mg/I 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used 1.00 mg/I 13.Turf fertilization rate 2.30 lbs/1000 sq ft 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf 0.50 fraction 15. Fraction of wastewater N lost as gas 0.50 fraction 16. Wastewater fraction removed by Sewer 0.00 fraction 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater 10.00 lbs/year 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land 0.95 fraction 19. Irrigation recharged from turf 5.50 inches/year INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS Nitrogen addition from irrigation 1.00 mg/I Fraction Natural Land 0.00 fraction Population Density 5.89 people/acre Nitrogen addition from precipitation 9.98 lbs/acre/year N content of wastewater incl.water used 10.00 lbs/person/year Heritage @ Cutchogue - Proposed LABELS FOR GRAPH • Overall Turf Nitrate Natural Conc. _ Sewage 7.0 Runoff mg/liter TOTAL MACRO COMMANDS {goto}a1- {goto}a1- {goto}d21- {goto}a21- {goto}a29- {home}{goto}a21- /wwh- {goto}b23- /wwu- {window} {golo}a 1- {goto}d22- {goto}d 1- {window}{goto}b23- {goto}a 1- /wwc- {goto}j1- {home}- {goto}a 1- /gnu {goto}j61- • {goto}a1- {goto}a41- • Heritage @ Cutchogue- Proposed • RESULTS: WATER RECHARGE NITROGEN LEACHED inches/yr r MG/yr r Ibs/acre/yr yr mg/I Turf 14.3 17.9 28.9 8.9 Natural Land 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 Wastewater 6.3 7.9 29.5 20.6 Impervious Runoff 18.9 23.6 4.8 1.1 TOTAL 39.5 49.4 63.1 7.0 Nitrogen concentration in recharge 7.0 I Heritage @ Cutchogue- Proposed Parameter Definitions • ------------------ 1. Fraction of land in turf- refers to area maintaned as lawn, must be between 0 and 1. 2. Fraction of land which is impervious-sum of roof area,driveways and roads; must be between 0 and 1.The fraction of land in natural vegetation is computed as 1 minus the sum of fraction in turf and the fraction impervious,thus the sum of these 2 must be less than 1. 3.Average persons per dwelling-the average number of people living in each house or dwelling unit. 4. Housing density-the number of dwelling units per acre. 5. Precipitation rate-the annual average precipitation in inches. 5.Water recharged from turf-the amount of water per unit area of turf which drains to groundwater.This can be computed from a water budget for the root zone.A 1-2-3 spreadsheet is available for this. [1] 7.Water recharged from natural land-the amount of water per unit area of natural of natural vegetation which drains to groundwater.This can be computed from a water budget. 8. Evaporation from impervious surface-the fraction of precipitation falling on impervious surface assumed to evaporate.Try 0.10. [1] 9. Runoff from impervious recharged-The fraction of the runoff which is recharged through recharge basins, ponds etc. Evaporation is subtracted. Use 0 here if storm sewers drain all runoff to surface waters. 10.Water use per person-average in-home use of water.Try 44 gallons per person per day. [2] 11. Nitrogen concentration in precipitation-average concentration, Use data from closest weather station where nitrogen tests were • done. 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used-average concentration in water used in homes. 13.Turf fertilization rate-average yearly nitrogen application rate expected for residential turf. 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf-the fraction of nitrogen applied from fertilizer, precipitation etc.which leaches to groundwater.For sandy soil try 0.35 if clippings are removed,or try 0.5 if clippings are left on turf.These values are based on Long Island studies [3],[4]. For tighter soils the fraction leached will probably be less. 15. Fraction of Wastewater N lost as gas-fraction of nitrogen in wastewater which volatilizes or is converted to gaseous N through denitrification. Roughly 0.50 under Long Island,N.Y.conditions.[5) This value is dependent on temperature and soil.Warmer areas will probably have higher fractions volatilized as will areas with tighter soils. Colder areas will probably have lower fractions. Vary this widely in your sensitivity analysis.(Perhaps 0.2 to 0.8) 16. Fraction of wastewater removed by sewer-efficiency of sewer.Try 0.90 which is to assume that 10%exfiltrates from sewers. If no sewers are present use 0. [4] (This input assumes off-site treatment). 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater-the average in the U.S. is 10 lbs/person/day. [2] 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land-the fraction of nitrogen in precipitation which is removed by natural land before the water is recharged. Should be at least 90 percent.Try 95 percent for • forested r ste areas. I Heritage @ Culchogue-Proposed BIBLIOGRAPHY [1] Mather,John R. 1979 The Influence of Land-Use Change on Water Resources.Water Resources Center, University of Delaware. Newark, Delaware. [2]Long Island Regional Planning Board. 1978. Long Island Comprehensive li Waste Treatment Management Plan(208 study). Hauppauge, N.Y. [3]Hughes, Henry B.F. and K.S. Porter. 1983.Land Use and Ground Water Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton. Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [4]Hughes, Henry B.F.,J. Pike and K.S. Porter. 1985.Assessment of Ground-Water Contamination by Nitrogen and Synthetic Organics in Two Water Districts in Nassau County, N.Y.Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [5]Andreoli,A., R. Reynolds, N. BartilUcci and R.Forgione. 1977. Pilot Plant Study: Nitrogen Removal in a Modified Residential Subsurface Disposal System. Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Hauppauge, N.Y. • Appendix F-4 BURBS Model Alternative 2- Cluster Alternative • BURBS CALCULATION SHEET ALTERNATIVE 2- CLUSTER ALTERNATIVE • • • Welcome to BURBS ----------------- A Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet for calculating the impact of residential development on the nitrate concentration in groundwater. «« Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University»» Ithaca, N.Y. 1985 There are 9 pages: A B C D E F G H I J 1 +-----------------------------------------------+ Press the "Alt" I Welcome I Instructions I Definitions 1 key with one I (you are here)I <Alt> 1 1 (3 pages) I letter 20 +---------------+---------------+ <Alt> D I to switch I Parameters I Results I I sections. 1 <Alt> P I <Alt> R 1 I 40 +--------------+--------------+ I I Calculations I I I Special I <Alt> C I I I Commands: 60 ----------------+ +---------------+ <Alt> W = results +parameters on split screen I Bibliography 1 <Alt> U = undo split screen <Alt> G = graphs +----<Alt> B----+ DATA- Enter a values for each parameter: 1. Fraction of land in turf 0.35 fraction 2. Fraction of land which is impervious 0.36 fraction 3. Average persons per dwelling 2.00 people • 4. Housing density 2.80 dwellings/acre 5. Precipitation rate 44.00 inches/year 6. Water recharged from turf 22.00 inches/year 7. Water recharged from natural land 22.00 inches/year 8. Evaporation from impervious surface 0.10 fraction 9. Runoff from impervious recharged 1.00 fraction 10. Home water use per person 44.00 gallons/day 11. Nitrogen concentration in precip. 0.10 mg/I 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used 0.30 mg/1 13. Turf fertilization rate 2.30 lbs/1000 sq ft 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf 0.50 fraction 15. Fraction of wastewater N lost as gas 0.50 fraction 16. Wastewater fraction removed by Sewer 0.00 fraction 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater 10.00 lbs/year 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land 0.95 fraction INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS Fraction Natural Land 0.29 Population Density 5.60 people/acre Nitrogen addition from precipitation 1.00 lbs/acre/year N content of wastewater incl.water used 10.04 lbs/person/year • LABELS FOR GRAPH • Overall Turf Nitrate Natural Conc. = Sewage 6.4 Runoff mg/liter TOTAL MACRO COMMANDS {goto}a 1- {goto}a 1- {goto}d21- {goto}a21- {goto}a29- {home}{goto}a21- /wwh- {goto}b23- /wwu- {window} {goto}a 1- {goto}d22- {goto}d 1- {window}{goto}b23- {goto}a 1- /wwc- {goto}j 1- {home}- {goto}a1- /gnu {goto}j61- {goto}a 1- {goto}a41- • • INSTRUCTIONS • It is assumed that you already know how to use Lotus 1-2-3. This 1-2-3 spreadsheet is set up to calculate the amount of water and nitrogen which will be recharged from a residential development. It calculates loadings from wastewater, turf, natural land and runoff from impervious surfaces. You must enter values for all the parameters on the data page which starts in cell A21. These parameters are defined and discussed on the page to right of this one. ----> If you are uncertain of the appropriate value to use for a parameter, we suggest that you try several values in the range of possible values. The numerical output from this model is only as accurate as the parameters and assumptions and hence should be interpreted carefully. There are several predefined graphs which you can use. This software is free to all owners of Lotus 1-2-3 and carries no guarantee. RESULTS: WATER RECHARGE NITROGEN LEACHED ----------- ---------------- inches/yr r percent nt lbs/acre/yr yr percent --------- - ------- -- --------- -- ----- • Turf 7.7 24% 17.7 38% Natural Land 6.4 20% 0.0 0% Wastewater 3.3 10% 28.1 61% Impervious Runoff 14.3 45% 0.4 1% TOTAL 31.6 46.2 Nitrogen concentration in recharge 6.4 mgA Graphs of the data can be accessed by typing <Alt> G. Select a graph, then type "Q"to exit graph menu. • Parameter Definitions ---• ----------------- 1. Fraction of land in turf- refers to area maintaned as lawn, must be between 0 and 1. 2. Fraction of land which is impervious -sum of roof area, driveways and roads; must be between 0 and 1. The fraction of land in natural vegetation is computed as 1 minus the sum of fraction in turf and the fraction impervious, thus the sum of these 2 must be less than 1. 3. Average persons per dwelling -the average number of people living in each house or dwelling unit. 4. Housing density- the number of dwelling units per acre. 5. Precipitation rate-the annual average precipitation in inches. 6. Water recharged from turf-the amount of water per unit area of turf which drains to groundwater. This can be computed from a water budget for the root zone.A 1-2-3 spreadsheet is available for this. [1] 7. Water recharged from natural land- the amount of water per unit area of natural of natural vegetation which drains to groundwater. This can be computed from a water budget. 8. Evaporation from impervious surface-the fraction of precipitation falling on impervious surface assumed to evaporate. Try 0.10. [1] 9. Runoff from impervious recharged-The fraction of the runoff which is recharged through recharge basins, ponds etc. Evaporation is subtracted. Use 0 here if storm sewers drain all runoff to surface waters. 10. Water use per person - average in-home use of water. Try 44 gallons • per person per day. [2] 11. Nitrogen concentration in precipitation - average concentration, Use data from closest weather station where nitrogen tests were done. 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used -average concentration in water used in homes. 13. Turf fertilization rate -average yearly nitrogen application rate expected for residential turf. 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf-the fraction of nitrogen applied from fertilizer, precipitation etc. which leaches to groundwater. For sandy soil try 0.35 if clippings are removed, or try 0.5 if clippings are left on turf. These values are based on Long Island studies [3],[4]. For tighter soils the fraction leached will probably be less. 15. Fraction of Wastewater N lost as gas -fraction of nitrogen in wastewater which volatilizes or is converted to gaseous N through denitrification. Roughly 0.50 under Long Island, N.Y. conditions.[5] This value is dependent on temperature and soil. Warmer areas will probably have higher fractions volatilized as will areas with tighter soils.Colder areas will probably have lower fractions. Vary this widely in your sensitivity analysis. (Perhaps 0.2 to 0.8) 16. Fraction of wastewater removed by sewer-efficiency of sewer. Try 0.90 which is to assume that 10%exfiltrates from sewers. If no sewers are present use 0. [4] 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater-the average in the U.S. is • 10 lbs/person/day. [2] 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land -the fraction of nitrogen in • precipitation which is removed by natural land before the water is recharged. Should be at least 90 percent. BIBLIOGRAPHY [1] Mather, John R. 1979. The Influence of Land-Use Change on Water Resources.Water Resources Center, University of Delaware. Newark, Delaware. [2] Long Island Regional Planning Board. 1978. Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 study). Hauppauge, N.Y. [3] Hughes, Henry B.F. and K.S. Porter. 1983. Land Use and Ground Water Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton. Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [4] Hughes, Henry B.F., J. Pike and K.S. Porter. 1985.Assessment of Ground-Water Contamination by Nitrogen and Synthetic Organics in Two Water Districts in Nassau County, N.Y. Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [5]Andreoli, A., R. Reynolds, N. Bartilucci and R. Forgione. 1977. Pilot Plant Study: Nitrogen Removal in a Modified Residential Subsurface Disposal System. Suffolk County Department of Health • Services, Hauppauge, N.Y. • 1 - t• a , ^a��a Vq^`�zf' 8387 yse 5� t� Y W,�'i h ut"' F3 of f sYv x la,f *-x'i t + x � YJ t fY ,v",yi YY a`R�N�a a` �r-f tTcx'+"'3` ' rrgti *' r fk :7 k �x-1nx E to t Y a t sr 1 .1 s Fa 5 1 S ,N" CY h. �vTM'�,u:d ���'��' '" �r�%ts� '��,4: w� ws asp, =.aka `E;� •� lr'A �ry i „aWE a 5 ti.r a 1 � �r x c v s4"2bs � 'ta sl crz a ivs�'i`r'sZ3f;,, t � 78� w� - xt llil- at' t t y 'i r r 7S.:. r• At {ga P xf�, Y,c^f, a. i�fi a f hA}." ' 3'TV F . ....... g a '" 'N:::f•.:"af z•:. vas q" `J?x.e5l S . r s..a+gL.s t x 'a • .......... ............. Lnm a ........ ... ..s•: 1 �._. ` ran" �x'ss_ #" ...........t: .r.. Appendix F-5 BURBS Model Alternative 3-Reduced Number of Units Heritage @ Cutchogue -Alternative 3 INSTRUCTIONS • ------------ It is assumed that you already know how to use Lotus 1-2-3. This 1-2-3 spreadsheet is set up to calculate the amount of water and nitrogen which will be recharged from a residential development. It calculates loadings from wastewater, turf, natural land and runoff from impervious surfaces. You must enter values for all the parameters on the data page which starts in cell A21. These parameters are defined and discussed on the page to right of this one. -----> If you are uncertain of the appropriate value to use for a parameter, we suggest that you try several values in the range of possible values. The numerical output from this model is only as accurate as the parameters and assumptions and hence should be interpreted carefully. There are several predefined graphs which you can use. This software is free to all owners of Lotus 1-2-3 and carries no guarantee. • Heritage @ Cutchogue Alternative 3 Welcome to BURBS • ----------------- A Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet for calculating the impact of residential development on the nitrate concentration in groundwater. «« Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University »» Ithaca, N.Y. 1985 There are 9 pages: A B C D E F G H I J 1 ------------------------------------------------- Press ---------------------- -------------+Press the "Alt" I Welcome I Instructions I Definitions I key with one I (you are here)I <Alt> 1 I (3 pages) I letter 20 +_______________+--------------+ <Alt> D I to switch Parameters I Results I sections. <Alt> P I <Alt> R I 40 +---------------+---------------+ I Calculations Special I <Alt> C I I I Commands: 60 +---------------+ ----------------- <Alt> _ _--+<Alt>W = results + parameters on split screen I Bibliography <Alt> U = undo split screen <Alt> G = graphs +----<Alt> B----+ DATA- Enter a value for each parameter: Area of site 45.99 acres 1. Fraction of land in turf 0.67 fraction 2. Fraction of land which is impervious 0.32 fraction • 3.Average persons per building 2.75 people 4. Building density 2.72 units/acre 5. Precipitation rate 44.00 inches/year 6. Water recharged from turf 22.00 inches/year 7. Water recharged from natural land 22.00 inches/year 8. Evaporation from impervious surface 0.10 fraction 9. Runoff from impervious recharged 1.00 fraction 10. Water use per person 111.24 gallons/day 11. Nitrogen concentration in precip. 1.00 mg/I 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used 1.00 mg/I 13. Turf fertilization rate 2.30 lbs/1000 sq ft 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf 0.50 fraction 15. Fraction of wastewater N lost as gas 0.50 fraction 16. Wastewater fraction removed by Sewer 0.00 fraction 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater 2.00 lbs/year 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land 0.95 fraction 19. Irrigation recharged from turf 5.50 inches/year INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS Nitrogen addition from irrigation 1.00 mg/I Fraction Natural Land 0.00 fraction Population Density 7.48 people/acre Nitrogen addition from precipitation 9.98 lbs/acre/year N content of wastewater incl. water used 2.00 lbs/person/year • Heritage @ Cutchogue -Alternative 3 LABELS FOR GRAPH • Overall Turf Nitrate Natural Conc. _ Sewage 5.0 Runoff mg/liter TOTAL MACRO COMMANDS {goto}a 1- {goto}a 1- {goto}d21- (goto)a2l- {goto}a29- {home}{goto}a21- /wwh- {goto}b23- /wwu- {window} {goto}a1- {goto}d22- {goto}d 1- {window}{goto}b23- {goto}a 1- /wwc- {goto}j 1- {home}- {goto}a 1- /gnu {goto}j61- • {goto}a1- {goto}a41- • Heritage @ Cutchogue -Alternative 3 RESULTS: • WATER RECHARGE NITROGEN LEACHED --------------- ---------------- inches/yr r MG/yr r lbs/acre/yr yr mg/1 --------- - ------- -- --------- -- ------- Turf 18.5 23.1 37.4 8.9 Natural Land 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 Wastewater 11.2 14.0 7.5 2.9 Impervious Runoff 12.8 16.0 3.2 1.1 TOTAL 42.6 53.2 48.1 5.0 Nitrogen concentration in recharge 5.0 I:: ISI • Heritage @ Cutchogue-Alternative 3 Parameter Definitions • ----- — -- ----------- 1. Fraction of land in turf- refers to area maintaned as lawn, must be between 0 and 1. 2. Fraction of land which is impervious-sum of roof area, driveways and roads; must be between 0 and 1.The fraction of land in natural vegetation is computed as 1 minus the sum of fraction in turf and the fraction impervious,thus the sum of these 2 must be less than 1. 3.Average persons per dwelling-the average number of people living in each house or dwelling unit. 4. Housing density-the number of dwelling units per acre. 5. Precipitation rate-the annual average precipitation in inches. 6. Water recharged from turf-the amount of water per unit area of turf which drains to groundwater.This can be computed from a water budget for the root zone.A 1-2-3 spreadsheet is available for this. [11 7.Water recharged from natural land-the amount of water per unit area of natural of natural vegetation which drains to groundwater.This can be computed from a water budget. 8. Evaporation from impervious surface-the fraction of precipitation falling on impervious surface assumed to evaporate.Try 0.10. [1] 9. Runoff from impervious recharged-The fraction of the runoff which is recharged through recharge basins, ponds etc. Evaporation is subtracted. Use 0 here if storm sewers drain all runoff to surface waters. 10.Water use per person-average in-home use of water.Try 44 gallons per person per day. [2] 11. Nitrogen concentration in precipitation-average concentration, Use data from closest weather station where nitrogen tests were • done. 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used-average concentration in water used in homes. 13.Turf fertilization rate-average yearly nitrogen application rale expected for residential turf. 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf-the fraction of nitrogen applied from fertilizer,precipitation etc.which leaches to groundwater. For sandy soil try 0.35 if clippings are removed,or try 0.5 if clippings are left on turf.These values are based on Long Island studies [3],[4]. For tighter soils the fraction leached will probably be less. 15. Fraction of Wastewater N lost as gas-fraction of nitrogen in wastewater which volatilizes or is converted to gaseous N through denitrification. Roughly 0.50 under Long Island, N.Y.conditions.[51 This value is dependent on temperature and soil. Warmer areas will probably have higher fractions volatilized as will areas with tighter soils. Colder areas will probably have lower fractions. Vary this widely in your sensitivity analysis.(Perhaps 0.2 to 0.8) 16. Fraction of wastewater removed by sewer-efficiency of sewer.Try 0.90 which is to assume that 10%exfiltrates from sewers. If no sewers are present use 0. [41 (This input assumes off-site treatment). 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater-the average in the U.S. is 10 lbs/person/day. [2] Treatment by STP provides an 80%nitrogen reduction(results in a treated nitrogen concentration of 10 mg/1). 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land-the fraction of nitrogen in precipitation which is removed by natural land before the water is • recharged. Should be at least 90 percent.Try 95 percent for forested areas. Heritage @ Cutchogue -Alternative 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY • [11 Mather, John R. 1979. The Influence of Land-Use Change on Water Resources. Water Resources Center, University of Delaware. Newark, Delaware. [2] Long Island Regional Planning Board. 1978. Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 study). Hauppauge, N.Y. [3] Hughes, Henry B.F. and K.S. Porter. 1983. Land Use and Ground Water Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton. Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [4] Hughes, Henry B.F., J. Pike and K.S. Porter. 1985. Assessment of Ground-Water Contamination by Nitrogen and Synthetic Organics in Two Water Districts in Nassau County, N.Y. Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [5] Andreoli, A., R. Reynolds, N. Bartilucci and R. Forgione. 1977. Pilot Plant Study: Nitrogen Removal in a Modified Residential Subsurface Disposal System. Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Hauppauge, N.Y. • ill Appendix F-6 BURBS Model Alternative 5- Alternative Design for Wastewater Treatment • • Heritage @ Cutchogue-Alternative 5 INSTRUCTIONS • ------------ It is assumed that you already know how to use Lotus 1-2-3. This 1-2-3 spreadsheet is set up to calculate the amount of water and nitrogen which will be recharged from a residential development. It calculates loadings from wastewater, turf, natural land and runoff from impervious surfaces. You must enter values for all the parameters on the data page which starts in cell A21. These parameters are defined and discussed on the page to right of this one. -----> If you are uncertain of the appropriate value to use for a parameter, we suggest that you try several values in the range of possible values. The numerical output from this model is only as accurate as the parameters and assumptions and hence should be interpreted carefully. There are several predefined graphs which you can use. This software is free to all owners of Lotus 1-2-3 and carries no guarantee. • • Heritage @ Cutchogue -Alternative 5 Welcome to BURBS • ----------------- A Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet for calculating the impact of residential development on the nitrate concentration in groundwater. «« Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University »» Ithaca, N.Y. 1985 There are 9 pages: A B C D E F G H I J 1 +----------------------------------------------+ Press the "Alt" I Welcome I Instructions I Definitions 1 key with one I (you are here)I <Alt> 1 1 (3 pages) I letter 20 +--------------+---------------+ <Alt> D I to switch I Parameters I Results I 1 sections. <Alt> P I <Alt> R I I 40+---------------+---------------+ I Calculations I I I I Special I <Alt> C I I Commands: 60 +--------------+ +---------------+ <Alt>W= results + parameters on split screen I Bibliography 1 <Alt> U = undo split screen <Alt> G = graphs +----<Alt> B----+ DATA- Enter a value for each parameter: Area of site 45.99 acres 1. Fraction of land in turf 0.52 fraction 2. Fraction of land which is impervious 0.48 fraction • 3. Average persons per building 1.95 people 4. Building density 3.02 units/acre 5. Precipitation rate 44.00 inches/year 6. Water recharged from turf 22.00 inches/year 7. Water recharged from natural land 22.00 inches/year 8. Evaporation from impervious surface 0.10 fraction 9. Runoff from impervious recharged 1.00 fraction 10. Water use per person 79.76 gallons/day 11. Nitrogen concentration in precip. 1.00 mg/I 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used 1.00 mg/I 13. Turf fertilization rate 2.30 lbs/1000 sq ft 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf 0.50 fraction 15. Fraction of wastewater N lost as gas 0.50 fraction 16. Wastewater fraction removed by Sewer 0.00 fraction 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater 2.00 lbs/year 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land 0.95 fraction 19. Irrigation recharged from turf 5.50 inches/year INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS Nitrogen addition from irrigation 1.00 mg/I Fraction Natural Land 0.00 fraction Population Density 5.89 people/acre Nitrogen addition from precipitation 9.98 lbs/acre/year N content of wastewater incl. water used 2.00 lbs/person/year • Heritage @ Cutchogue -Alternative 5 LABELS FOR GRAPH • Overall Turf Nitrate Natural Conc. _ Sewage 4.4 Runoff mg/liter TOTAL MACRO COMMANDS {goto}a 1- {goto}a 1- {goto}d21- {goto}a21- {goto}a29- {home}{goto}a21- /wwh- {goto}b23- /wwu- {window} oto a1- {g } {goto}d22- {goto}d 1- {window}{goto}b23- {goto}a 1- /wwc- {goto}j 1- {home}- {goto}a 1- /gnu {goto}j61- • {goto}a1- {goto}a41- • Heritage @ Cutchogue -Alternative 5 RESULTS: • WATER RECHARGE NITROGEN LEACHED ----------- --- ----------- - -- inches/yr r MG/yr r lbs/acre/yr yr mg/I --------- - ------- -- -------- Turf 14.3 17.9 28.9 8.9 Natural Land 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Wastewater 6.3 7.9 5.9 4.1 Impervious Runoff 19.0 23.7 4.8 1.1 TOTAL 39.6 49.5 39.5 4.4 Nitrogen concentration in recharge 4.4 I • • Heritage @ Cutchogue-Alternative 5 Parameter Definitions • ------------------- 1. Fraction of land in turf-refers to area maintaned as lawn, must be between 0 and 1. 2. Fraction of land which is impervious-sum of roof area, driveways and roads; must be between 0 and 1. The fraction of land in natural vegetation is computed as 1 minus the sum of fraction in turf and the fraction impervious, thus the sum of these 2 must be less than 1. 3.Average persons per dwelling-the average number of people living in each house or dwelling unit. 4. Housing density-the number of dwelling units per acre. 5. Precipitation rate-the annual average precipitation in inches. 6. Water recharged from turf-the amount of water per unit area of turf which drains to groundwater.This can be computed from a water budget for the root zone.A 1-2-3 spreadsheet is available for this. [1] 7.Water recharged from natural land-the amount of water per unit area of natural of natural vegetation which drains to groundwater.This can be computed from a water budget. 8. Evaporation from impervious surface-the fraction of precipitation falling on impervious surface assumed to evaporate.Try 0.10. [1] 9. Runoff from impervious recharged-The fraction of the runoff which is recharged through recharge basins, ponds etc. Evaporation is subtracted. Use 0 here if storm sewers drain all runoff to surface waters. 10. Water use per person-average in-home use of water. Try 44 gallons per person per day. [2] 11. Nitrogen concentration in precipitation-average concentration, Use data from closest weather station where nitrogen tests were • done. 12. Nitrogen concentration in water used-average concentration in water used in homes. 13.Turf fertilization rate-average yearly nitrogen application rate expected for residential turf. 14. Fraction of nitrogen leached from turf-the fraction of nitrogen applied from fertilizer, precipitation etc.which leaches to groundwater. For sandy soil try 0.35 if clippings are removed,or try 0.5 if clippings are left on turf.These values are based on Long Island studies [3],[4]. For tighter soils the fraction leached will probably be less. 15. Fraction of Wastewater N lost as gas-fraction of nitrogen in wastewater which volatilizes or is converted to gaseous N through denitrification. Roughly 0.50 under Long Island, N.Y.conditions.[5] This value is dependent on temperature and soil.Warmer areas will probably have higher fractions volatilized as will areas with tighter soils. Colder areas will probably have lower fractions. Vary this widely in your sensitivity analysis.(Perhaps 0.2 to 0.8) 16. Fraction of wastewater removed by sewer-efficiency of sewer.Try 0.90 which is to assume that 10%exfiltrates from sewers. If no sewers are present use 0. [4] (This input assumes off-site treatment). 17. Nitrogen per person in wastewater-the average in the U.S. is 10 lbs/person/day. [2] Treatment by STP provides an 80% nitrogen reduction (results in a treated nitrogen concentration of 10 mg/1). 18. Nitrogen removal rate of natural land-the fraction of nitrogen in precipitation which is removed by natural land before the water is • recharged. Should be at least 90 percent.Try 95 percent for forested areas. Heritage @ Cutchogue -Alternative 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY • [1] Mather, John R. 1979. The Influence of Land-Use Change on Water Resources. Water Resources Center, University of Delaware. Newark, Delaware. [2] Long Island Regional Planning Board. 1978. Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 study). Hauppauge, N.Y. [3] Hughes, Henry B.F. and K.S. Porter. 1983. Land Use and Ground Water Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton. Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [4] Hughes, Henry B.F., J. Pike and K.S. Porter. 1985. Assessment of Ground-Water Contamination by Nitrogen and Synthetic Organics in Two Water Districts in Nassau County, N.Y. Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. [5]Andreoli, A., R. Reynolds, N. Bartilucci and R. Forgione. 1977. Pilot Plant Study: Nitrogen Removal in a Modified Residential Subsurface Disposal System. Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Hauppauge, N.Y. • Appendix G Cultural Resource Assessment Tracker Archaeology October 2007 • • R CKER '� Archaeology Services,Inc. 2r9c.Hl�g t/re �7aoflf¢P-r of ![e¢Ily-c"e v , REPORTS OF INVESTIGATIONS Phase I Archaeological Investigation for the proposed Heritage at Cutchogue subdivision Cutchogue, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York October 2007 Prepared for: Nelson, Pope &Voorhis, LLC, Melville, New York Prepared by: Alfred G. Camm; sa, M.A. /RPA Felicia Cammisa, Alexander Padilla f Re ort#: P 529 TRACKER ARCHAEOLOGY SERVICES, INC. MONROE, NY 10950 • (845) 783-4082 NORTH BABYLON, NY 11703 . (631) 321-1380 C. MANAGEMENT SUN4]ARY PR none known Involved acencies: Town of Southold Phase• Phase IA & IB Location• Cutchogue Town of Southold Suffolk County Survey Area: Length: about 2000 feet (610 meters)' north-south Width: about 950 feet (290 m) east-west. Acres Surveyed: 45 acres (18.2 hectares) USGS: Southold, NY Survey overview: ST no. & interval: 767 ST's at 50-3ft (15-1m) intervals. Size of freshly plowed area: na Surface survey transect interval: na • Results: Isolated prehistoric and historic finds Results of Architectural Survey: No. Of buildings/structures/cemeteries in project area: none No. Of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area: 10 No. Of previously determined NR listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: none No. Of identified eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: none Authors: Alfred G. Cammisa, M.A.'/RPA Felicia Cammisa, B.A. Alexander Padilla, B.A. Date of Report: Report completed October, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS C • Introduction . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 Prehistoric Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Historic Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5 Field Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Field Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8 Appendix 1: Figures and Plates _ Appendix 2: Shovel Test Notes Appendix 3: State Site Forms LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Portion of the Southold, New York U.S.G.S. Figure 2 Location of shovel tests on the project area. Figure 3 Portion of the 1797 township survey. Figure 4 Portion of the 1836 Colton map. Figure 5 Portion of the -1858 Chace map. Figure 6 Portion of the 1896 Hyde atlas. Figure 7 Portion of the 1904 USGS. Figure 8 Portion of the County Soil Survey. LIST OF PHOTOS Photo 1 Looking east from ST 268. Photo 2 Looking north from ST 268. INTRODUCTION Between August 8 and September 20, 2007, TRACKER-Archaeology Services, Inc. conducted a Phase IA documentary study and a Phase IB archaeological survey for the proposed Heritage at Cutchogue subdivision in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The purpose of the Phase IA documentary study was to determine the prehistoric and historic potential for the recovery of archaeological remains. The Phase IA was implemented by a review of past and current environmental data, archaeological site files, other archival literature, maps, and documents. The prehistoric and historic site file search was conducted utilizing the resources of the New York State Historic Preservation Office in Waterford, New York. Various historic and/or archaeological web sites may have been visited to review any- pertinent site information. .The purpose of the Phase IB field survey was to provide physical evidence for the presence or absence of prehistoric or historic sites on the property. This was accomplished through subsurface testing and ground surface reconnaissance. The project area consists of the entire property at approximately 45 acres. The property i5 bordered to the south by School House Lane and town land, to the east by Bridle Lane, Spur Road, and private properties, and to the remaining sides by private properties. The study was conducted by TRACKER-Archaeology Services, Inc. of Monroe, New York. Prehistoric and historic research was conducted by Alfred Cammisa, M.A. ' Field investigations were conducted by Jean Cascardi, B.A. and James Gelarden, S.A. Report preparation was by Alfred Cammisa, Felicia Cammisa, B.A. , and Alexander Padilla, B.A. The work was performed for Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, Melville, New York. ENVIRONMENT Geology The project area is located in the southeast portion of New York State in the northeastern part of Suffo14 County. This portion of New York lies in the Atlantic Coastal Plains Physiographic Province. The coastal. plain slopes gently eastward and is actually a strip of recently emerged sea bottom. The soils in this region consist largely of sand, clay and marl (a mixture of clay, finely fragmented shell and calcite) . This region of Suffolk County, on Long Island's North Fork lies within a glacial outwash plain south of the Harbor Hill Moraine. A glacial meltwater channel had once separated Orient Point from the rest of the north fork (Schuberth 1968: cover map, 9, 184-186; Van Diver 1985: 70; Sirkin 1995:142, 149-150) . Soils and Topography Soils on the project area consist of: ,.. 1 Name Soil Horizon color Texture Slope- Drainage Landform Depth In(cm) Inclusion Carver 0=1-2in (3- leaves sand 15-35 well side Scm) slopes & 0=2-1 (5-3) mull moraines A=0-3 (0-8) 10)[k4/1 A=3-8 (-20) 10YR6/1 B=8-14 (-36) 7.5YR5/6 Haven A=0-3in(0- 10YR4/2 Lo 0-2 & well outwash 8cm) 2-6 plains B=3-10 (-26) 7.54/4 and B=10-19 (-48) 7.5YR5/6 moraines Haven, A=0-3in(0- 10YR4/2 Lo 0-3 well outwash thick 8cm) plains surface B=3-10 (-26) 7.54/4 layer B=10-19 (-48) 7.5YR5/6 Plymouth A= 0-4in (0- 10YR3/2 LoSa 3-8 well along 10cm) drainages B= 4-10 (-26) 10Yr5/4 in B= !0-17 (- cultivate 43) 10Yr5/6 d fields Riverhead Ap 0-12 (0- 10YR4/3 sandy 3-8 well moraines i' 30) loam & outwash B 12-27 (-69) 7.5YR5/6 plains (Warner 1975: map #17, pgs. 67, 71-72, 79, 81-82) . Elevations on the property are approximately 30 feet above mean sea level. The project area is located on the north fork, a peninsula where the distance between the Shelter Island and Long Island Sounds is small. Hydrology The project area is about 2900 feet northeast of Downs Creek, 3180 feet north of West Creek, and 3270 feet northwest of Wickham Creek, all tidal inlets flowing south into Peconic Bay. Vegetation The predominant forest community inhabiting the Coastal Plain in this vicinity (Cape Cod to the Carolinas) was the Northern Pine-Oak Forest. These forests are maintained largely by the effects of frequent fires. Were it not for the fires which the pine species have adapted to, these forests would slowly change to Mesic, dominated by oak, hickory and red maple. Northern. Pine-Oak Forests fall within the larger Xeric Forest category. Xeric forests occur on sandy or otherwise poor soils that are overly dry. All coastal plains. of eastern North America are Xeric. They generally have lower species diversity than bottomland forests (Kricher 1988:16-17, 65-66) . The reason the forest soils and surfaces are so dry in this moist region is due to the excessive drainage of overly sandy soils on the Coastal Plain. '� 2 At the time of the Phase IB archaeological investigations, the project area SII consisted largely of scrub and brush with young trees such as birch, maple, locust, pine, cedar and weeds such as poison ivy, golden rod, and milkweed. PREHISTORIC POTENTIAL A prehistoric site file search was conducted at the New York State Historic Preservation Office (NYSHPO) . The search included a 1 mile radius around the study area. The following sites were recorded: NYSM Sites NYSHPO Sites Distance from Site Description APE ft(m) 692 3500 (1067) Solecki Site: Transition, burial 8244 1056+ (322+) Transitional, Burial 4882 5117 (1560) ACP: Village 8245 3200+ (976+) Hall's Creek Site A Paleo Indian point was recovered in this vicinity (Stone nd:map) . �. In addition, Indian trails were reported in the vicinity of the project area connecting the tidal creeks along the southern and northern portions of the north fork, one appearing along, or near, Route 25 and 48. Although the foot trails were reported during early historic times, they undoubtedly existed prehistorically. Assessing the known environmental and prehistoric data, we can summarize the following: -The project area is about 2900 feet northeast of Downs Creek, 3180 feet north of West Creek, and 3270 feet northwest of Wickham Creek, all tidal inlets flowing south into Peconic Bay. -The project area is mainly comprised of level, well drained topography. -The project parcel is located on a peninsula. Previous archaeological investigations have shown these areas as more desirable for prehistoric occupation (Cammisa et al 1999A; Cammisa et al 1999B; Cammisa et al 1995, Cammisa 1996) . -Prehistoric sites are near the study area:. -Indian trails were located in the vicinity. In our opinion, the study area has a higher than average potential for the recovery of archaeological remains. The type of site encountered could be a small processing/procurement site. 3 HISTORIC POTENTIAL Contact Period (Seventeenth Century) At the time of European Contact and settlement, the study area was likely occupied by the Corchaug (Cutchogue) . This was probably the main branch or village of the large Corchaug tribe (Stone nd:map; Stone-Levine 1980:161) . The previously mentioned, Indian trails were reported along Routes 25 and 48, connecting tidal creeks along the southern and northern portions of the north fork. A wigwam was also reported in this vicinity along the aforementioned foot trail (Stone nd:map) . It may have been .Town policy to keep the Indians grouped in the western portion of the Town which was considered wilderness at this time. In 1664 it was voted that the Indians could plant in Hogs Neck if they had sufficient fencing (Anonymous 1982:$) . Eighteenth Century As mentioned, a wigwam was recorded in the vicinity. The wigwam was reported in the 1740's by Reverend Horton who probably lived in it while visiting (Stone nd:map; Stone 1980: 170) . The 1797 Town of Southold survey depicts Downs Creek and Route 25. No structures are on or adjacent to the project area. A windmill and school house are depicted along Route 25 (Figure 3) .. Nineteenth Century The 1836 Colton map shows Route 25 in Cutchogue. Schoolhouse Road is not in i' (Figure 4) . The 1858 Chace map shows Route 25 but no other side streets around the project area and no structures nearby either (Figure 5) . The 1896 Hyde atlas depicts Depot Lane now but not School House Road or the other smaller side streets around the property. No structures are adjacent to the project area either (Figure 6) . Twentieth Century The 1904 OSGS shows no structures on or adjacent to the project area (Figure 7) . In the late Nineteenth Century, the Town farming became highly specialized in areas such as potatoes, cauliflower, brussels sprouts, peas, beans, and the like (Bailey 1949.162) . An historic site file search was conducted at the New York State Historic Preservation Office (NYSHPO) . The search included a 1 mile radius around the study area. The following sites were recorded: NYSM Sites NYSHPO Sites Distance from Site Description APE ft(m) 4881 2709+ (826+) ACP: Fort, Village, Stockade Assessing the known environmental and historical data, we can summarize the 4 following: The project area is about 2900 feet northeast of Downs Creek, 3180 feet north of West Creek, and 3270 feet northwest of Wickham Creek, all tidal inlets flowing south into Peconic Bay. - -The project area is mainly comprised of level, well drained topography. -Indian trails were located in the vicinity. -A Contact Period wigwam is situated in the vicinity. -No map documented structures were on or adjacent to the project area. An historic native American site was reported in the vicinity. In our opinion, the study area has a moderate potential for the recovery of historic sites. The type of site encountered might be a Contact Period site_ There would be a low potential for European-American sites. FIELD E METHODS Walkover Exposed ground surfaces were walked over at approximately 3 to 5 meter intervals to observe for artifacts. Covered ground terrain was also reconnoitered at 15 meter intervals for any above ground features, such as berms, depressions, or rock configurations which might be evidence of a prehistoric or historic site. Photographs were taken of the study area. Shovel Tests Shovel tests were to be conducted at 15 meter intervals across the project area. Each shovel test pit measured about 30 to 40 cm. in diameter and was dug into the underlying B horizon (subsoil) 10 to 20 cm. or more when possible. All soils were screened through 1/4 inch wire mesh and observed for artifacts. Each shovel test was flagged in the field. Positive shovel tests were doubled flagged. All shovel tests and any archaeological finds were mapped on the project area map at this time. Soil stratigraphy was recorded according to texture and color. Soil color was matched against the Munsell color chart for soils. Notes were transcribed on pre- printed field forms and in a notebook. FIEIM RESULTS Field testing of the project area included the excavation of 767 shovel tests (ST's) across the project area. One prehistoric quartz point tip and 1 quartz flake were recovered in ST' s 242 and 171 respectively. Eight radials were excavated at 1 and 3 meter intervals along the 4 cardinal directions from the positive STs. Results were negative showing these to be an isolated finds. Scattered eighteenth to nineteenth century artifacts from the plow zone included 1 blue transferprint whiteware from ST 43, 1 blue decorated creamware from ST 121, 1 lead glaze earthenware from ST 131, 2 Jackfield-like ceramic from ST 132, i 5 6 flower pot fragments from ST 172, 1 brown transferprint whiteware from ST 204, and 1 olive green bottle glass and 1 undecorated whiteware from ST 230. _ Stratiaraohy: Stratigraphy across the project area included the following: -O horizon - 2 to 8 cm. thick of forest root mat or sod, leaf litter, and humus. -Ap horizon - 6 to 37 cm. thick of 10YR4/3, brown sandy loam. -B horizon_ - 10 to 20 cm. dug into of 10YR5/6 yellow brown sandy loam. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Phase IA had determined the study area had a higher than average potential for the recovery of prehistoric sites. The property had a moderate potential for native American historic sites but a low potential for European-American sites. The Phase IB resulted in the excavation of 767 ST's. Isolated prehistoric and historic finds were encountered. No further work is therefore recommended. BIBLIOGRAPHY Bailey, Paul 1949 Long Island: The Story of Two Great Counties, Nassau and Suffolk. Volume 1. Lewis Historical Publishing Company, New York. Bayles, Richard 1962 Historical and Descriptive Sketches of Suffolk County. Empire State Historical Publishing Company XVIII. Cammisa, Alfred, with William Sandy, Cheryl Claassen and Felicia Burgos 1995 Archaeological Investigations at the Seaford Park Archaeological Site in The Journal of the New York State Archaeological Association, Fall: Cammisa, Alfred G. 1996 Phase IB Archaeological Survey Phase II Intensive Testing of the Pellicano Site for the Proposed Bayview Development Bayview, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York. TRACKER-Archaeology Services. Ms. on file with NYSHPO. Cammisa, Alfred, Felicia B. Cammisa, William Goldsmith, and Justine McKnight 1999A Personal Space Within a Middle Woodland Small Base Camp and a Late Woodland Procurement Station: The Robinson Sites, Phase III Data Recovery Excavations, North Sea, Suffolk County, New York. TRACKER- Archaeology Services. Ms. On file with NYSHPO. Cammisa, William Goldsmith, and Felicia Burgos Cammisa 1999B Archaeological Investigations at the McCauley Site, Strong's Neck, Long Island. TRACKER-Archaeology Services. Ms. On file with NYSHPO. Kricher, John C. and Gordon Morison 1988 The Peterson Field Guide Series: Eastern Forests of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 6 Levine, Gaynell, editor 1978 Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Volume 2: The Coastal Archaeology Reader. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Pelletreau, William 1982 Southold, in History of Suffolk County, 1683-1883. Suffolk County Tricentennial Commission. W.W. Munsell and Company. Schuberth, Christopher J. 1968 The Geology of New York City and Environs. New York: Natural History Press . Sirkin, Les 1995 Eastern Long Island Geology with Field Trips. Book and Tackle Shop, RI, Stone-Levine, Gaynell 1980 Language and Lore of the Long Island Indians. Readings in Long island Archaeology and Ethnohistory. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Stone, Gaynell 1993 Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory: Volume 3, -The History and Archaeology of the Montauk. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Thompson, Benjamin Franklin 1918 History of Long Island. Volume 2. Ira J. Friedman, Inc. , New York. Tooker, William Wallace _ 1962 The Indian Place Names on Long Island and islands adjacent, with their probable significations. Ira J. Friedman, New York. _ Van Diver, Bradford B. 1985 Roadside Geology of New York. Missoula Montana: Mountain. Press Publishing Company. Warner, John W. ; W. E. Hana; R. J. Landry; J. P. Wulforst; J. A. Neeley; R. L. Holmes; and C. E. Rice 1975 Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in Cooperation with Cornell Agricultural Experimental Station. Maps Chace, Jay 1858 Map of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York.Philadelphia: John Douglas. Colton, J.H. 1836 Map of Long Island. J.H. Colton. Hyde and Company 1996 Map of Long Island. Brooklyn, New York: Hyde & Company. Jensen, H.M. and J. Soren 1974 Hydrology of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. Stone, Gaynell not dated Map of.Native Long Island. Long Island Culture History Lab & Museum- 7 Suffolk County Archaeological Association. �. United State Geological Survey 1956 Southold, New York quadrangle map, 7.5 minute series. 1909 Shelter island, New York quadrangle map, 7 .5 minute series . 8 APPENDIX 1 kd`qT art .b ' �a - ♦4 f Y��� � \j1, ; �... �% ` .;�i�a ,A�.. f - CKE of • ,�' � .� .. �. +; r � \ P� � xT �._. .i x . Project ♦s; f ¢. area t le it 1 tw4_. � ♦. .. s . a �sn�' ` iY_ .. .. �. ♦ ;.... R - J 4 �• . . l •/ Ju 1 . r � s r e ♦, rt p. III `� ♦' � l� s ... �..s r^' _ _' _ '� u� i A A ♦ \ E3.04 ; Nx x Fi u re 1 Portion of he Southold, NY USES - . 117=1000' ... .J Zoe • Figure 3 Porton of the 1797 Town survey f r A w Project area 16;t .4..., L rr .•max..�,� +� • c: , �� 1 i r C� • , I, � .` .. •ttsl�� � E Figure 4 4 Portion f the 1836 Colton map r #.. N E + 7 Oki R • ."` err ��e [1� }tn• •� C E' Project area MMTO s !f � •:X ffy/ E {EA 4 f Portion of the 1858 Chace map . g. �i i rT�T F' .' • � P 4 T■ �F'� '�'. '. �:' �.. t i•.. ,� .� `�#! _4r�1 rata^ '" s fes` Project . ,� f+ff area ��•" {�� Ito r. r #'f�•i'fM��R 1F if:�c ' 't## y#9 t � rfi e � fe t�t r• i 4i! r t f , tt r •# • [ # t # *,elf Nxim - 41 ' .F ► n'• * Yj ry.,i (�� NC �•�' M +•"'..r•-,.•.-..r:�^ '� :+ '4' ""•��YY•��}}s �. '1. ''" ,: i'.{ • ell I t'73arfnn r - ' O F + 3 •r 10 • " , :� "p..�tY e, \, 4 �'tt, ..'OI. Lr P4�et In �`{• • �+rS .+ tis rx.,•j t i t+�':.. tj ►.. 4 � �� �. '�[.t! t,(11�+ $iat .y a�.]r^`: r n x ++. �61s t H- C� ;mer• '� �;� " '�y� + ; �•=• . � \ HfEB . 1 _ �' ...�" +�' r ...:-t tom''`. •a. t - moi.«f :j.; - . •.►n4 � k � ♦ • +�� �+-r IL try \dsffiwrr '� 1. n may: > �. � •� .4-�t- z�y7s• 4-4111 r k .: �. ^:ry ��.�'� , ��`5��•a' � ��.J ., ��:• � - -. s /+►. � ti. S� X14 ''� •K :. T ' ! + \ a �t �lJy N v ��' 'G' n■ .� is n�1` o �_�� �..�y, • �lV 'S!• � � IFR f f��rs' � .. _i� ,�` •�//f a 1p Pit 0. 0 {40JL , Cis�}fr�'�`rr , or Lir lk Figure 6 ►i:.ti 73 Portion of the 1896 Hyde atlasa s 3 " a SVF .1 K..-�"',�, W. „�.-uy'Y C""�A "`"'- t-�,,.(a� �"" �.z 'r�.t..� s"F�a. � -'3n � '1' j � f`f�Ci=•, ��- • gvP��sef.�-.s a a rva5� s � �Js"��,F��G � �• ys.�' c3 s. .E.br z s'- .L'�`•rr x� �"sxx_a� 2 3� '.�-.z �' d�S'�" i '� ��`�'s � �- "�,3.��s��•'`r-�."Y+ S sAx s'd �H�..`��vj�r�/,�s«."axy"��,� 't�/S'f aT „�'lat`fr`�t+dl`' �i� e.v��-�.. 6 S5" S�{2. '3' Y" 3" ✓ 33�� ��h .P�' 'T'�fr�'3 G !'� f �/ � �-1��..]4..�' �.l*. �� s^ lea l'.F �"' T.C,.-•: '.sS'�, 'k-•'��-d`� �.�'�s '�'S Yi��36��3 .Y ,.� -'S ] �. A t`��-'*1�. �*S ,-i ��` S <'a �"3'a.+vi�/`F '}r.. is -:i •`. r7 -i '�'vK?'�� }� ,�,,��r✓yrnc r�`�xL ,�-'�.s"s,t -'� '� �... l •?, l'�,a,,,Sz �` a':�-.€ `�-�,�Z'SS. 3 -�4.i �� 3 '`,.�- '�f` •Y '� � S' �s��'`�v .�y�Us-'sn ��.9 -.r�''��� sn'>Y��k�3F�-fit» v � d � �, �4,+-� � i'"'�� 2-�3`�a>�9����.�'��t 4p .sFF > +� 1"f F� u t {y f3 tY#z V c1 � a><.<3-rte" ' re° - s� � �45,' is'+' .} 1��. ..d- ,,,,Fit,+' t �S",^fi}' #-'-c= ?_ - `'ate ✓> r �iF *'�' ��"�u�[S- d ��.=f ac is $`-5'Sa '^a ', r -„s?: RIME—" s - ��, ,}� an s�a z,3��/� '-'�'sx"„-� +'=�9 ��'x'S"�N^v '�"3.�' '4.�.. c ,.,� �*.�, ,�,�., ^"�'� t•' £�a.✓-»'z.., � .s-�'�3�5 �z.,'"„-�'P.ra-•��dz- - -� =e r, �*�a- k^ �.� l ,f'�' � �'x�"x'� ''-y � �_.� Y' �. ' P -aA et� 'mss �:�` `< �i .J��"�k�'_ '..•y '�} tv� .l moi?u. "v ''L�"�i4 3 -5 '1, \ `' "�.?%�y. A.-. ,.� �, r'� x`r'i "c'a`n � "" a ,.a��` ' �> eek .�-s yY. -r .Pj `k�.`�i,•3s�'. 'Ma �r �n,r� ..''zr•..3' t -+r �'x '' 3+ "t *.` `-`r'e `" }j % fit' fi?E �^rs- . . rlr`C' $r,.,:fi� s `IN � c, ma ,z si '' `''�ef '-••.i �'/.s+ a.•a """ Rag" �F 'v� -- v+^ h � 3� "5�' 7 R-c,,,� ♦ �� �x V4[sx may= �j >�qtr' � �z�'"3'bvcE ' tT H �� 'Y�� �$ �35-� T'4 l >- �-c. � -.L3`` "� 3x 35 > -� ,F•.s,.L�.Q� -s Y F S- y 3 � F,r�' i"v> 3 "� s -f' Edi3',X " hs,'i`[ii•Ie "ss� z --zx' `� ,�'-u'?,' �L � r 'y�'ee4, a `3YI�S' �'s, r G -.yf -� f *z ..� n .E>s x3'+a- a�� � `v��"x �s-� S -I '�,a �., +� ")- ��".��h�. 1',� .� 4"r""�'i` 'n'hP'--�-/+4 'u`�'`i"'S e# "'ts` ♦r 1 >;s,,'�+_, a� � � mak-. i gtc.i c' x,>•a� y�mc ,�, rh � - S��`�-spa 3� �fii�"�3 mss. } +fin �4��S (V ` �te 4� � � -J �fyi't Ts 4 1 LTi F .�. � iV'>•��� '< g�--�y ti, av, r'�� �5r G� e r -.x�.vi F 5 3 �-e°K, S}\ 3 �A �iF � iT : ♦ �/. >•r? �,a,'4 ,+�� ti1 z' <t C_ a >\ tr :+ '4 t,3r � �r.�x".f en ��*:`• *'',�sarr �` �*� r �xS r 'rY�-�=� �� .����s�"` k t a' 'X��-v�.�"�,ri C s"#��€'��f.� .:% F �y'z7�>r��a•:'H >t N a2, ["'"4i G's -t � 'L. zt'Srve ; ty� d x +'p Yir i -ti Lt 4 Yr'f fpr6 f/ F�� IS!mK aG N'vF - r✓ Jl \ Y �- Ti. ` � are " m,. � -xg" g 1 JAG s 9 �w".1' tEz f-(/. r a.,"J' 'S'a'1 ;1, '` .. P 1-w� ""$, ^rtt€_`✓ r r�a�cr`K air ; nmiT /"�sa `t2,�„L t -La's„, ,<� .- !�•'a� yy4� S� .w'- V rf3 '✓' x 5 iA"�-•4Y-� � },� r z i�cb" d`>bi x �' Ol � � v><'S` i �-- r t � �o- '- T yaR txr f. �d� mi n •ti'/,c �P -7 4. t t 5.*hi\ a r l 3 .z \ x# t x rs5 y. •� s� y a- "'�' `fi > _ ` �� 5 c xtF ��yx`aF,- : £5`F • �' T"�,L x r' y.�y �+ -y, �r-s\3,nF: • ��t r ,y° �s "�EF '"t�k` ti ,� x5\ ani y, �Y�„'xi .did^`.. a rte tp�3 a z £'-"4 v' tr' a' � t Ott \ 3'•d�-/ // J s 11y''w� �`� ar'6"+.-F_ �'• �,.rb; ����� "'��> w '1� va -�n�,�s,sem'>, .�� a - 1:.mac`-.l/ � ,rr .vt �Sa �y �? .-.��t♦: \fit c �` '- r ♦' �rzE''�- ,� z .c'3" 45 w•ti -3-Yy\f ?s .f s3 -'-w\�.``t4� _ ?.yYti..�rw' c ✓'r ..r"'=a✓ ss 'cEty+ u 2 — NO, _ �� � C p 1. mow, Fgy- M �sS',�vi1�'*y �. L41�^ '"� K •- -4e �nek � ts .1i- `" '." 1WIN kk h� jr aYy N NA SG TN o an All 1-1.1 �3` � �Yv' h :✓ rti� � .. r x y . �rz }- t� cl xr �y3 _.3��- ell 4 +,, r.A t ���, _ 'a ��..�uat 'n T� i �� 3r tom*. re '` ¢ •� � �x .� a�- Ilk WRy S ._ �-'S'✓ . -"N"y�l 5 y ( -. i3 ���rE�• oiaF� - �� s"^t'''x�. � �.� y +C! y � �t. a 3sf fr � � /��j �__ �� _; R x �� � � ,-2� �._ •y �r�1�_��� f _ &� _ 4t ; +..f .aa ^'r` e,{v t�_, +e'iv �,�� s„�?t�i� •, '/ - v sc`s aS'P`'��o�Y� "C,�.-;�� �`_ .l kk ry ' S.73 �f '' y : 1 tt� ` '.�` � �+c.F ��. ` P 3'r�'Y '��t^� 'e •E' • �° a ��r r b 4'. ✓ _ 1 �;� ,ye y_I�l e"'�,•+w... i'4e}4 �\ R� � r s iw-*r4 ./ z .� s.. � / �• �.�,e.—d°�zCr,; s!w �� �aE�r 4 t.._- ���a-yam ^ RF F F, �'' A'' Z •'� - / s -.'f ;} .F � { y 4�<e`{./'9 s r. x 'm® 9d,q $ -< 8 :,�' 'R qq r< - $ yy •fr bis _ a4as y `t, e _p ? a �' u 9 �T !v �H-' 17 � qt ld $[• .5;Z-�+Q:� ,:�:i �1'�` L* �e\# .s�.-�„ � `_ `, � b tl � { `�E ='i . fir •� - / -e ads _;! a �. ;. ter-. •� :: ` .``f r y� 4r ��f\' ` F s F tee. _ Af -]�'�-`' .Y 4 � +P�.. r�• F �t • F-. i��. � ...E � y 'a s �'^ � v � c� -µ.�� h as -_,� \�s 'y �3iii A r " r it ��•L`4C� max"�'t--�. 'R �. ''���a� � ���: a�.•ss..�. t - F s t ♦ 1t` 3 � �`,. e , 1 � .aj{- ! •_� �. .`.� _ -lam` ;. SHOVEL TESTS STP LV DEPTH(CM) TEXTURE` COLOR HOP, 'COMMENTS 1 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-30 SandyLoam(SaLo) IOYR4/3 Ap . NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 1OYR5/6._ B NCM 2 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-25;: -SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM..: 3 2535 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM o 3 1 0-3 Sod A/O' NCM 2 3-20SaLO 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 20-35 SaLo` 10YR5/6 B NCM 4 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 5 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-29: SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. . 3 28-38 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM, 6 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-26`. SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 7 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-31 SaLo IOYR4/3 . Ap NCM 3 31.42 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 8 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-19 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 19.-29 - SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 9 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-27, SaLo 1QYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo I0YR5/6 B NCM 10 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-36 SaLo I0YR5/6 B NCM. 11 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 2657 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 12 1 0-6- Sod A/O NCM 2 ¢-28; SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM . 3 . 2940 . SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 13 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-23.: Salo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 23x33 SaLo 10YR5/6 ,. B NCM F 28 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM } 2 2-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM.. . 3 32-34,roots SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM, 29 1 0-4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4:24 SaLo . 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 24-34 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 30 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-10 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 10.25 SALo 10YR5/6 B NCM 31 1 02 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-21 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 21-31 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 32 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-36 SaLo 10YR516 B NCM 33 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 622• SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 22=40 SaLo., 10YR5/6 B NCM 34 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 35. 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo 10YR516 B NCM 36 1 0-4. Sod A/O NCM 2 4-23 SaLO IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 .23=35 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 37 1 0-3 Sod A/O. NCM 2 3-21 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 21-32 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 38 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2 24 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 24-34 SaLo. , : 10YR5/6 B NCM 39 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-24 SaLo 10YR413 Ap _ NCM 3 24-34 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NcM 40 -1 fl=3- Sod A/O NCM 2 3-21 SaLo - 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 21=34 SAL0 10YR5/6 B NCM 41 1 0"'2 Sod A/O NCM -36 SaLo: . 2 2 10YR4/3 Ap . NCM 3 36746 SaLo rOYR5/6 B NCM 56 1 04, Sod A/O NCM h 2 4-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap .NCM 3 27-37 SaLo lOYR5/6 B NCM 57 1 0-2'' Sod A/O NCM 2 2-35 SaLo, 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-46 SaLo 10YR5/6- B NCM 58 1 0=5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3• 33-43 Salo :' 10YR5/6 B NCM 59 1 0-4' Sod A/O NCM 2 4-29 SaLo- - 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-40 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 60 1 0-2 ` Sod A/O NCM 2 7-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 36-46 SaLo. 10YR5/6 B NCM 61 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3732 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3.- 32-45 SaLo 10YR5/6, B NCM 62 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 SaLO 10YR4/3 Ap NCM r- 3 33=44 Salo- 10YR5/6 B NCM 63 1 0-Cs ` Sod A/O NCM 2 6:26 SaLd 10YRN3 Ap NCM 3 . 26-36 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 64 1 0-3 . Sod A/O NCM' 2 3-31 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-41 SaLO 10YR5/6. . B NCM 65 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-20 SaLO 10YR413 Ap NCM 3 20-36 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 66 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-35 SaLO 10YR5/6. B NCM 67 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-43 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 68 -1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-26 SaLo . 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 S.aLo 10YR5/6 _ B NCM 69 1 Or3 Sod A/O NCM - 2 3-30 Salo 10YR4/3.: ; Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo- i0YR5%6 B NCM 84 1 04 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-22 Salo 10YR4/3 . Ap NCM 3 22-32 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 85 1 0,4,. Sod A/O NCM 2 -..4-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 _ Ap NCM 3 29-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 86 1 0-4 . Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34. SaLo IOYk4/3 Ap Nj 1M 3 3445 SaLo- 10YR5/6 B NCM 87 1 0-2. Sod A/O NCM. 2 2-32 SaLo. IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32--44 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM . 89 1 0-4. Sod" A/O NCM 2 4-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-35,rocks SaLo'. 10YR5/6 B NCM 89 1 . 011 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-38 SaLo : 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 x3$,48 SaLo. 10YR516 B NCM 90 1 .-0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-32 SaLO . ' . 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 .32;44 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 91 1 ..0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 -x.4-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 a35-47 SaLo. , IOYR5/6 B NCM 92 1 <Or6 Sod A/O' NCM 2 6.34 SaLo 10YR413 Ap NCM 3 34.45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B . NCM 93 1 0-6 Sod A/C NCM 2 6.36 'Salo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 36-48 SaLo IOYR5/6 B 27CM 94 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-34 Saha 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 .34-44 SaLO 10YR5/6 B NCM 95 1 '0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-42 Salo IOYR516 B NCM 96 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM _ 3 35,46 Sabo IOYR5/6. B NCM 97 1 .-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-38 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 .38-50 SaLQ. IOYR516 B NCM 112 1 0-8' ` ` Sod A/O NCM 2 8=22• SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. • 3 22-32 SaLo 10YR5/6 B' NCM 113 1 0-4 : Sod A/O NCM 2 432 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-36,rocks SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 114 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-25 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-36 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 115 1 - 0-6Sod A/O NCM 2 6-34 Salo 10YR4/3 _ Ap NCM, 3 34-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 116 1 0=2 Sod AO NCM 2 2-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-44 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 117 1 0-6 . Sod _ A/O NCM 2 6-30 SaLo. 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo' IOYR5/6 B NCM 118 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4 3g SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-48 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 119_ 1 0-2 Sod A/O . NCM 2 2-23 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 23-33 SaLo IOYR5/6,. B NCM 120 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM ..2 3-32 SaLo IOYR4/3..: Ap NCM 3 32-45 SaLo . I0YR5/6 B NCM 121 1 0=6 Sod A/O NCM 2 . 6-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap ceramic 3 36-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 122 1 6-6• Sod NO 9l(rM 2 6=24 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 24-34 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 123 1. 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-21 SaLo .. IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 21-31 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 124 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM 2 426 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 Salo 10YR5/6.- . B NCM 125 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-27 Salo, 10YR4/3- Ap .NCM 3 2-M8 SaLo. < '• 10YR5/6.. B NCM 140 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-2$- SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM: . 3 28=38 Salo 10YR5/6 B. NCIvi 141 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-26 Sabo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 142 .1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM' 2 4-25`. SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM .3 25,37 SaLo 10YR5/6 . B NCM .143 1 043 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-291 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-39 SaLo 104YR5/6 B NCM 144 1 0 4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-38 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 145 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2132- SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-44 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 146 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-38 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM . 3 38-48 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 747 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 "2-33 SaLO " 10YRN3 Ap .NCM 3 33-44 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 148 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3245 Salo IOYR5/6 - B NCM 149 1 ©-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-25 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap _ NCM 3 25-35 SaLo10YR5/6 B NCM 150 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 2940 SaLo 10YR5/6 - .. B NCM 151 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3.18 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 18-29 SaLo IOYR5/6 _. B NCM 152 4 Q4. Sod A/O NCM 2 4-26 Sala 10 4 YR /3 . AP NCM 3 26-37 SaLb 10YR5/6 B NCM 167 1 0=6- Sod A/O NCM 2 6-36' SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 .3646' SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 168 1 0-7• " Sod A/O NCM 2 7-3.2 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3242 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 169 1 0-5 Sod A/O. NCM 2 5-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-35 . SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM: 170 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5"j SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-48 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM i71 1 04 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 - Ap NCM 3 29-39 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 172 1 0=6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-34SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap flowerpot frag 3 34-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 173 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 232: SaLO' 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-44 SaLo : IOYRS/6 B NCM 174 1 0'-4• Sod . A/O NCM 2 4-33' SaLo I0YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3343 SaLo. IOYR5/6 B NCM 175 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-38 SaLo I0YR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 38.49 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 176 1 0-2 Sod A/O . NCM 2 2-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 177 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-32 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-45 SOLO 10YR5/6 B NCM 178 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3545 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 179 -1 0 6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33=43 SA-10 10YR5/6 . B NCM 180 1 0-3 Sod NO NCM • 2 3-24 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 24-35 Salo 10.4R5/6 B NCM 307 1 0-4" Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM • 3 34-47 SaLo" 10YR5/6 B NCM 308 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 29-49 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 309 1 0-3, ' Sod A/O NCM 2 3-31 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-4'1 Salo IOYR5/6 B NCM 310 1 03 Sod NO NCM. 2 3-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap -NCM 3 33-44 SaLo10YR5/6 B NCM 311 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM 2 445 SaLO 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-46 Sato IOYR5/6 B NCM 312 1 O'-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 SaLo IOYR48 Ap NCM 3 3347 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 313 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-28 SaLo 10YR4/3 AP NCM r- 3 28-38 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 314 1 0-8 Sod A/O NCM 2 8-29 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-39 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM. 315 1 0=6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-30 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 316 1 0-4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4-29 SaLo IOYR413 Ap NCM 3 29-39 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 317 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6=29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 2-0-41 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 318 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-32 SaLo 10YR4/3' Ap NCM 3 32-44 . SaLo IOYR5/6 - B NCM 319 4 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3343 SSLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 320 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-38 SaLo IOYR516 B NG1 335 1 ' 0-2 ` Sod A/O NCM 2 2-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM • 3 36-48 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 336 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-31'. SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-42 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 337 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-49 SaLO 10YR5/6 B NCM. 338 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-30 SaLo I0YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 339 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-33 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM: 3 3343 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 340 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-35 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-46 SaLo . IOYR5/6 B NCM 341 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM '. 2 6-33 Salo, 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 342 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM .2 6-34SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-44 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCA4 343 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33=44 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 344 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29.40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 345 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-39 SaLO 10YR5/6 B NCM 346 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 .6-28 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28-50 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 347 -1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-44 SALO 10YR5/6 B NCM 348 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-33 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-43 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 363 1 0-8 Sod A/O NCM' '.. 2 8-30- SaLo 10 4.- YR /3 Ap NCM• • 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 364 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-28 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28-38' BaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM' 365 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM: 2 4-34" SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-47 SaLo: 10YR5/6 B' NCM' 366 1 0-3 Sod ' . A/O NCM' 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 _ Ap NCM 3 29-39 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 367 1 M Sod A/O NCM 2 3-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-42 SaLo 10YR5/6 B ' NCM 368 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3.23 SaLo 10YR413 Ap NCM. 3 .- 23-rocks. 369 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM r 2 6-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM - 3. 35-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 370 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2; 6-16- SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3: 16-26 SaLo 10YR516 B NCM 371 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5=34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-44 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 372 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-31 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-41 SaLo' 10YR5/6 B NCM 373 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-28 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28-38 SaLo 10 YRSl6 B NCM 374 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6. B NCM 375 _ j 0-5 Sod A/O NCM - 2 CM -2 529 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-40 SPLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 376 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM • 2 2-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3546 SaLo.; 10YR5/6: ., B NCM 391 1 0.-4'. Sod A/O NCM 2 . 4-34 Salo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM . 3 34-46' ' SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM• . 392 1 0=5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCA 393 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-38- SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 . 28-40 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM. 394 1 0-4Sod A/O NCM 2 4-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-35 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 395 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29. SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-49 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 396 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-28 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. S. 3 28-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM c 397 1 0.3 Sod A/O NCM s 2 3-33SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM.' 3 33.44 SaLo 10YR5/6 ' B NCM 398 1 0-3 Sod A/O NOM. .. 2 3-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-41 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 399 1 0-6 Sod . A/O NCM 2 6-31 SaLo . 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-42 SaLo 10YR5/6 B. NCM 400 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM . 3 25-36 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 401 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo,: . 10YR5/6 - B NCM 402 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-26 Salo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-37 SaLo. 10YR5/6 B NCM , 403 1 075 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-29 SaLo- 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-39 Salo. - 10YR5/6 B NCM 404 1 0-4: Sod A/O NCM 2 4-32 SaLo -; IOYR4/3 . Ap NCM III �. 3 38-49 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCIGI- 419 1 0-5`. Sod A/O NCM 2 5-27 SaLo IOYR4/3 . Ap NCM 3 27-37 ' SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM. 420 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 , 34-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 421 1 0.8- Sod A/O NCM 2 8-33:' SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 3345 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM'. 422 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-28 SaLo 'IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 2638•` SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 423 I 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3447 SaLO 10YR5/6 B NCM 424 1 0-3 ' Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM- 3-1 29=49 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM :'. • "IF 425 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 : 3-23 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM.. — 3 23-26,rocks . SaLo IOYRS/6 B NCM .,. 426 114: 03:- SodA/O NCM 2;<:. 3-30 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 30 41 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM ;.. 427 1 '.' 0-3 ': Sod A/O NCM 2 3=27 SaLo 1OYR4/3 Ap NCM, 3 27-39 SaLo 10YR5/6 . B NCM 428 1 0-6 • Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 429 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-35 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 430 1 0-2 Sod A/O NEM 2 2-26 SaLo. IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo IOYRS/6 B NCM 431 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-30 SaLo IOYR4/3, Ap NCM 3 30-41 SALO 10YR5/6 B NCM 432 1 0-5, Sod A/O NCM 2 5-25 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-35 SaLo 10YR5/6' . B NCM 447 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-28 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM. • 3 2840 SaLo 10YR5/6 . B NCM 448 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 449 -1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-16— SaLo I0YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 16-rocks. 450 1 0-8 Sod A/O NCM 2 8-26- SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM- 3 26-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 451 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-41 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 452 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3447 Salo 10YR5/6 . B NCM 453 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM e 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM - 3 29-49 Salo 10YR5/6 .. B NCM - t 454 1 0=3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-33SaLO 1OYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-43 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM l' 455 1 0.3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-26' SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 456 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-39 S'aLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 457 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 Salo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33=47 SaL.o 10YR5/6 B NCM 458 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-24' SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 24-34. SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 459 1- 0-8 Sod A/O NCM 2 8-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 460 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2. 3-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo. 10YR5/6 B NCM 195 1 0=3. Sod A/O NCM. 2 3-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 . Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 . B NCM 196 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6733 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 33=47 SaLo - 10YR5/6 B NCM. 197 1 04 Sod A/0 NCM 2 47-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM- 3 30-40 SaLoIOYR5/6. B NCM 198 1 0-3 Sod' A/O NCM 2 3727. Salo _.. 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 . 27-38 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 199 .1 0-4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4-24 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 24-34 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 200 1 0-4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-38 SaLo . IOYR5/6 B NCM 201 1 0=5 Sod A/0 NCM 2 5-34 SaLo' IOYR4/3 Ap NCM f .. 3 34-44 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 1 0-2 Sod . A/O NCM 2 2-37 SaLo` 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 - 37-49 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 203 1 0-4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4-33 SaLo 10YR4/3. Ap NCM 3 33-43 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 204 1 0-4 Sod A/0 NW 2 4-38 SaLo 16YR4/3 Ap tramerprint 3 38-48 Salo IOYR5/6 B NCM 205 I 0-2 . Sod A/O NCM 2 2-34 SaLo 10YR4%3 Ap NCM 3 34-44 SaLo IOYR5/6:. B NCM 206 1 0-3 Sod A/0 NCM 2 3-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM .3 32-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 207 1 0-6 Sod A/0 NCM 2 6-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-45 Salo IOYR576 B NCM 208 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-39 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 39.=50 SaLo 10YR5/6. B NCM �- 223 1 0-13 Sod A/0 NCM 2 13-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM �. 3 33-44 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 224 1 0-5 Sod A/0 NCM 2 5=42 SaLo IOYR4/3 - - Ap NEM 3 42-53 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 225 1 0=6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6733 , SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM- . 3 33=47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM . 226 I 0:7 Sod A/0 NCM 2 T29 Salo 1OYR4/3 .: Ap NCM 3 29-39 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM. 227 1 0-8 Sod A/O NCM 2 8-37 Salo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 37-50 SaLo. 10YR516 B. NCM 228 1 04 Sod A/0 NCM 2 7-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM: 3 3041 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 229 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-29 Salo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-39 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 230 1 0-5 Sod A/0 NCM 2. 5-26 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap g1aSs,undec ww 3 26-36 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM' 231 . 1 0-2 Sod A/0 NCM 2 2-38- SaLO IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-48 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 232 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 SaLO IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-43 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 233 I 0-4 , } Sod . A/O NCM 2 434 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3444 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 234 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-35 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3545 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 235 -1 Q-3 Sod A/0 NCM 2 3-39 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 39-50 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 236 1 0-6. Sod A/0 NCM 2 6=38 SaLo lOYR413 Ap NCM 3 38-50 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 251 1 0=3 Sod A/O NCM: 2 335 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap .NCM 3 35=45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 252 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM' 253 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM.. 2 4727SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 254 1 0-6, Sod A/O NCM 2 6-21' SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 21-311 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 255 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4=25 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 2535 SaLo 10YR516 B NCM 256 1 0=8 Sod A/O NCM 2 8-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-41 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 257 ' 1 0=4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-37 SaLo. .10YR5/6 B NCM 258 1 073 Sod A/O NCM 2 329 SaLo 10YR4/3. Ap NCM 3 2939 Salo : 10YR5/6 B NCM 259 1 0-3, Sod A/O NCM 2 3-27 SaLo: 10YR4/3 Ap NCM .3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 260 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-32 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 .32744 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM' 261 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-35 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 262 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 430 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3040 SaLO 10YR5/6 _ B'" NCM 263 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 231 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3142 SaLo. 10YR5/6 B NCM 264 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-32 SdLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 279 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 29-49f SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM-- 280 1 0-3 . > Sod A/O NCM . 2 3-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 . AP NCM 3 25-35 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 281 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-33)" SaLo. IOYR4/3 Ap NCK 3 3343 SALo 10YR5/6 B NCM . 282 1 0=5: Sod A/O NCM- 2 5=27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. - 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 283 1 0=6Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-47 SaLo. 10YR5/6 B NCM.- 284 CM.284 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-28.' Salo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 2838 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 285 1 0-5. Sod A/O NCM 2 5-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM Y' 3 2939 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 286 1 0-5: Sod A/O NCM- 2 5-26 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 287 1 04': Sod A/O NCM 2 4-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29.39 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 288 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM - 3 3043 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 289 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2=32 SaLo- 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32=44 SaLo- 10YR5/6 B NCM 290 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-32 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-42 SaLo IOYR5/6. B NCM 291 1 04 + Sod A/O NCM 2 433 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-44 SpLo- 10YR516 B NCM 292 . 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM `. 2 2=33 SaLo IOYR4/3_ AP NCM '� 3 33-44 Salo. 10YR516 B NCM 475 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM: ' 2 4=29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29=39 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM.:. 476 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM . 2 2-28 ` SaLo 1.OYR4/3 Ap NCM - 3 28'=39'" SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 477 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2. 5=29 SaLo 10YR413 Ap NCM. 3 29=40': SaLo 10YR516 B NCM.'' 478 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-25 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 25-39 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM, 479 1 0-8 Sod A/O NCM 2 8=30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 . SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM" 480 1 0-2'` Sod A/O NCM 2 2=26 SaLo 1OYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-38 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 481 l 0-4 Sod A/O NCM' 2 4-26 Salo 10YR413 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM` 482 1 0=3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-35SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 483 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 . Ap NCM 3 29-40 SaLo 10YR516 B NCM 484 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3 30 SaLo 10YR4/3: Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6, B NCM 485 1 04 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-26. SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-36 SaLo 10YR516 B NCM 486 1 0-6% Sod A/O NCM 2 6-30 SaLo' 10YR413. Ap NCM . 3 30-4.0 SOLO 10YR5/6 B NCM 487 -1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 425 SaLo - 10YR4/3 . Ap NCM 3 41-57 SaLo,: 10YR5/6 B NCM 488 1 .0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-24 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 24-35 SaLo, r 10YR5/6 B NCM 503 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-31SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-43 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 504 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-16 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 16-28 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 505 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2'28 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28=40 Salo 10YR5/6_ B NCM 506 1 0-4. Sod A/O NCM 2 4-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 507 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-30 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 $aLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 508 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3;- 29-40 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 509 1 0-2' Sod A/O NCM 2 . 2-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM : . 3 , 26-38 Salo 1OYR5/6 B NCM 5'10 1 0.4 Sod A/O NCM 2k- 4-34 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap . NCM 31 34-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 511 1 " . 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-49 SaLo 1OYRS/6 B NCM .512 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3.28 SaLo 1OYR4/3 Ap .NCM 3 28-40 SaLo . 10YR5/6 B NCM 513 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 343 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-impeded by rocks. 514 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-15 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 15-ioots. 515 _1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 33-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 516 1 0-6 Sod A/O - NCM 2 6-28 SaLd 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28=40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM �.. 531 1 0-2 Sod A/O -NCM. \ 2 2-27 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM • 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM < ' 532 1 0-3Sod A/O NCM 2 3-28 SaLo 1OYR4/3 Ap NCM . 3 28-39 .' SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM ' 533 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-29' SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM . 3 29-39: SaLo 10YR516 B NCM 534 1 012 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-30- SaLo 10YR4/3, Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 535 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4.30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 536 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-46 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 1. 537 1 0=8 ` Sod A/O NCM ,v 2 8-33 1 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM. 3i 33-43' SaLo 10YR5/6 . B 538 1_.'= 0-.2 Sod A/O NCM V- _ 2-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM- 3>' 30-40 SaLO IOYR5/6 B NCM 539 1'` 0-4 Sod A/O NCM. 2 4-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-47 $aLo IOYRS/6 B NCM 540 1 0-3 . Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-49 Sato 10YR5/6 B NCM. 541 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-33 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3344 'SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 542 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM . 2 3-30 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap .NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 543 -1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-31 SaLo 10YR4/3 : Ap NCM . 3 31-41 $aLo 10YR5%6 B NCM 544 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-30 SaLo 1OYR4/3 . . Ap 3 30-41 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 559 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM C 2 4-31 SaLo 10YR4/3 A NCM: Ap 3 31-41 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 560 1 0-3Sod A/O NCM 2 3-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-48 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 561 1 _ 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-A- ' SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28-38 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 562 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-38 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM: 3 38=49 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 563 1 0.5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-30 SaLo 1OYR4/3. Ap NCM 3 30-43 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 564 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-28 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 s 28-40 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 565 1 0-1 Sod A/O NCM' ! .5 2 1-31 . SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM r. 3g 31-44 SaLo. 10YR5/6 B NCM 566 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM' 211. 4-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NG7M. 3 ' 30-41 SaLo 10YR5/6 • B NCM 567 1 0-Z Sod A/O NCM 2 2-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3040 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 568 1 . 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 569_ 1 04' Sod A/O NCM 2 434 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 570 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-38 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 571 -1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-39 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 39-49 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 572 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM- 2 CM2 3-41 SaLo. IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 41-54 SaLG •` ' 10YR5/6 B NCM 588 1 0-3Sod A/O NCM 2 3-38' SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-44,iocks SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 589 1 0=4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4-41 _ Sato IOYR4/3 Ap NCM' 3 41-51 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 590 1 0-3 Sad A/O NCM - . 2 3-40 SaLo IOYR4/3' Ap NCM' 3 40-50 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 591 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-41 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 41-51 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 592 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-30. SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 593 1 0-5 Sod A/0 NCM - 2 5=28' SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM- 3 28=38 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM ar 594 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM R 2 2-28 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 55 1 0-3._ Sod A/O NCM r 2 341 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM' :4 3 45-52 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 596 1 0-4- Sod A/O NCM 2 4-40 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 40-50 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 597 1 0-6 Sod A/O -NCM 2 6-36 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3646 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 598 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM ' 2 . 243 Salo IOYR4/3 Ap IdCM 3 43-53' -SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 599 1 04 Sod A/O NCM 2 441 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 41-51 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 600 -1 0-3. Sod A/O NCM 2 340 SaLo 10YR4/3 . Ap NCM. 3 40-50 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM r 601 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM l 2 3-42 SaLo 10YR4/3 - Ap NCM 3 42=52 SaLo 10YR5/6- B NCM 616 1 0-51 Sod . A/O NCM �. 2 3-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM .3 35-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 617 1 0-4Sod A/O NCM- 2 4-31 Sa.Lo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM: 3 31-41 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM: 618 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCMeL 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM.. 619 1 0=2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2730 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 620 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM i 2 3-36 Sato IOYR4/3 Ap NCM, 3 36-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM- 621 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6134 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 ;^ 34=44 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 622- 1 6-2 ' Sod A/O NCM 2 2-31` SaLo . 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-42 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 623 1 0-2. Sod' A/O NCM 2 2=27 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 : 27-37 SaLo IOYRS/6 B NCM 624 .1., 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-36 SaLo 10YR4/3' Ap NCM 3 36-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 625 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-31 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-41 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 626 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 . Ap NCM' 3 36-48 SaLo 10YR5/6. B NCM 627 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-28 SaLo 10YR4/3 . Ap NCM 3 28-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 628 -1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-29 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-49 Salo 10YR5/6 - B NCM _ 629 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM '• 2 3-28 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28=38 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 644 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3545 SaLo . 10YR5/6 B NCM: 645 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM' 2 3-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 . -Ap NCM 3 36-48 SaLO 10YR5/6 B NCM 646 1 04 Sod A/O NCM 2 44V SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3142 SaLo 10YR5/6.. B NCM' ' 647 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM' 2 3-38 $aLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-48 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 648 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-23 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 29-39 SALo 10YR5/6 B NCM 649 1 0=3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-38 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-49' SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 650 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM g r 2 6-26SaLc 10YR4/3 Ap. NCM =' 3 26-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 651$ 1 072 Sod A/O NCM' 2 2.30 Salo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM . ' 3 30-40 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM. 652 1 0=5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-39 ' SaLo I OYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 39-SD SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 653 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-23" SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 23-27,rocks SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 654 1 0=8 Sod A/O NCM 2 8-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3549 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 655 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-43 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 43.53 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 656 -1 0=4. _ Sod A/O NCM 2 4-38 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-50 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 657 1 0-3" Sod A/O NCM 2 3-39 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3949 SaLo 10YR5/6 .: B NCM 672 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM • 2 6-30 SaLo IOYR4/3 'Ap NCM 3 30-$O SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 673 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-31 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-41 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 674 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-35 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-45 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 675 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-36 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 36-47 SaLo' IOYR5/6 B NCM 676 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 3 2 41 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 31-41 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 677 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-32 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3242 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 678 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM, s' ' 2. 3-53 Salo. IOYR4/3 Ap NEM F- 3,' 53-63 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 679 1'; 0=4 ' Sod A/O NCM' 2j` 4-26 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 26-37 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 680 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2=32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3243 SaLo IOYR516 B NCM 681 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-45 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 682 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-38 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-48 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 683 1 0-8 Sod A/O NCM 2 8-32 SaLo' IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-42 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 684 -1 0_-2 Sod A/O NCM .2 2-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 36-48 S.ALo 10YM/6 B NCM 685 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-33' SaLo I0YR4/3 Ap NCM . 3 33-43 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 700 1 0-3 Sod A%0 NCM C• 2 3-37 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM' 3 37-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM` 701 1 0-6 Sod A/0 NCM 2 6-30 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 702 1 0-6 - Sod A/0 NCM 2 6-15 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 15-25 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 703 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-17 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 17-27 SaLo 10YR5/6 B.. NCM 704 1 0-4 Sod A10 NCM 2 4-34SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-35,rocks SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 705 1 0-3 . Sod A/0 NCM 2 3-24. SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM' 3 24-26,rocks SaLO IOYR5/6 B NCM 706 1 0-2: Sod A/0 NCM 2 2-27 SaLo. IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 707.: 1 0-3. Sod A/O NCM _` 2 3.28. Salo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 28-39 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 708 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-27 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 709 1 0-2 Sod. A/0 NCM . 2 2-38 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 . 38-149 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 710 1 0-6 Sod A/0 NCM 2 6-27 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 27-38 - SaL0 IOYR5/6 B NCM 711 1 0-4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 712. 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 ' Ap NCM 3 32-42 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 713 1 0-2 Sod A/0 NCM 2 ' -2-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 36-48 SaLo 1OYR516 B NCM 728 1 0-2 Sod A/0 NCM' 2 2-37 SaLO IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 37-48 SaLo IOYR5/6 B Ncm 729 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-32 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 32-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 730 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-30 SaLo " 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 30-40 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 731 1 . 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 36-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 732 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-15 SaLo IOYR4/3 . Ap NCM 3 15-20,rocks SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 733 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM- 2 4-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 :. 32-42 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM" p 734 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM' �f 2- 3-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3" 36-50 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 735 1 , 0-2 Sod A/O NCM' 2 2-35 — SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3% ' 35-46 Salo 10YR5/6 ' B NCM 736 1 0-3 Sod A/0 NCM 2 3-38 Sato 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 38-49 SaLO 10YR5/6 B NCM 737 1 0-4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 738 1 0-2 . Sod A/0 NCM 2 2-28 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM" 3 28-40 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 739 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-34 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 740 -1 0-4"_ Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34 SaLo" 10YR4/3 Ap 'NCM 3 34-46 Salo 10YR5/6 B NCM 741 1 .0-4 Sod A/0 NCM 2 4-27 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 . 27-37 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM III 756 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap _ NCM 3 36-46 SaLo. IOYR5/6 B NCM 757 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-35 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 758 1 0-6 Sod A/O NCM 2 6-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 36-47 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 759 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-40 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 40-52 SaLo 10YR5/6 . B NCM 760 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-32 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3242 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 761 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM 2 3-36 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM- 3 36-50 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 762 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-35 SaLo IOYR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3546 SaLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 763 1 0-3 Sod A/O NCM' 2 3-35 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 35-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM - 764 1 04 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-31 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 3142 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM, 765 1 0-2 Sod A/O NCM 2 2-36 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 36-46 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 766 1 0-5 Sod A/O NCM 2 5-34 SaLo 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-45 SaLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 767 1 0-4 Sod A/O NCM 2 4-34 SaL0 10YR4/3 Ap NCM 3 34-46 SaL0 10YR5/6 B NCM APPENDIX 3 r 9emaEenD ce,lte CemMi/omf - NEW YORK STATE PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORK NYS OFFICE OF PARS$,RECREATION&HISTORIC PRESERVATION (518)237-8643 For Office Usd Only--Site identifier Project Identifier Eieritaee Date 10-2-07 Your Name Alfred Cammisa Phone(845)-783-4082 Address 62 Pickerel Rd. Monroe NY Organization(if any) TRACKER-Archaeoloay Services 1. SITE IDE,ITIFIER(S) Heritase Isolates 2-COUNTY Suffolk ' One of thi`fallowingt CITY TOWNSHIP_Southold INCORPORATED VILLAGE UNINCORPORATED V11LAGE OR HAMLET !]-i ere 3.PRESENT OWNER Address 4. SITE DESCRIPTION(check all appropriate categories): Site x Stray Finds _Caveftcksheltei ' Workshop ' Pictdgraph _Quarry _Mound grad _Shell Midden _Village _Surface Evidence _,Catap _Material in plow zone _Material below plow zone Buried evidence _Intact Occupation floor _Single component _Evidence of features _Stratified' _Multicomponent Location _Under cultivation Never cultivated x Previously cultivated _Pastureland -2L-Woodland _Floodplain _Upland _Sustaining erosion Soil Drainage: excellent x good_ fair— poor_ Slope: flat_ gentle x moderate— steep Distance to nearest water from site(approx-) 2900 Elevation: 30 amsl 5. SITE INVESTIGATION(append additional sheets,if necessary): Surface--date(s) 8-14 to 9-20-07 _Site map (Submit with form)- Collection Subsurface--dates) 8-14 to 9-20-07 J Appendix H Community Services Coordination Correspondence with the Southold Union Free School District, May 12, 2008 Correspondence with the Suffolk County Water Authority, December 12, 2006 Correspondence with the Suffolk County Water Authority, August 14, 2007 Correspondence with the Suffolk County Water Authority, October 15, 2007 Correspondence with the Suffolk County Water Authority,November 6, 2007 • Correspondence with the Long Island Power Authority, December 18, 2007 Letter to the Town of Southold Police Department, May 12, 2008 Letter to the Mattituck Cutchogue Union Free School District, May 12, 2008 Letter to the Cutchogue Fire Department, May 12, 2008 • I'll Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services October 17, 2007 Southold Union Free School District P.O. Box 470 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46+/-Acre Parcel at Comer of School House Lane and Grifhng Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concern: This firm is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Griffing Street Cutchogue,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York. The current property is vacant land. The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse complex, entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue, designated as a seniors only establishment. This establishment will create approximately 139 units in 131 buildings for residents 60 and over. No children will be allowed to live in the complex. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impacts on the school. Please confirm that the project will be will be in your school district, and also please provide any comments or information that you feel are of importance. Your response will be included in the DEIS. Thank you for your assistance in this-matter. Please feel free to call mat at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request. Very truly yon, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,INC. Keith - Environmental Scientist 0:�2007�2007340\Cos pondmn \Southold UFSD.doe - 325.West Main Street, Babylon, NY 11702 Tel: (631)587-5060 Fax: (631)422-3479 www.gpinet.com GPIGreenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services May 12, 2008 Southold Union Free School District 420 Oaklawn Avenue P.O. Box 470 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46+/-Acre Parcel at Comer of School House Lane and Griffmg Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concern: As stated in letter of October 17,2007, Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Griffing Street, Cutchogue,Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The current property is vacant land. The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse complex,entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue, designated as a seniors only establishment. This establishment will create approximately 139 units in 131 buildings for residents 60 and over. No children will be allowed to live in the complex. • It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impacts on the school. Please confirm that the project will be will be in your school district,and also please provide any comments or information that you feel are of importance. Your response will be included in the DEIS. If no response by May 30 we will assume there are not objections to the project. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to call mat at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request. Very truly yours, G ENMAN-lPEDERSEN, INC. Keith Holley Environmental Scientist v �• 0:\20072007340\Conespondmn \Southold UFSD.doe 325 West Main Street, Babylon, NY 11702 Tel: (631)587-5060 Fax: (631)422-3479 www.gpinet.com IPI- Gtde> an - Fen, Inc, Engineering and Cons a fror Serihm May I 2005- ... . Southold Union Free School District � �8 420 Oaklawn: .Avenin P.O.Box 470 Southold,NY 11971 Rc: Propose&Deve'toptimitzo#-eHentegeat-Cutciho to 46+'1-Acct Paaredl atC r tfieT tt el-io¢se Lane aiid•Gr f(tnt;Strett Iown of Souftfrli.Soffislik County_New Yerk- TDist'3.atoiW5katim192_Block.01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concern:. As stated in leoer of October 17,2007,Greenman-Pederasty Inc.is the process of*Pcpet 6jAkt eaviionmental evaluation of the proposed development of the 11am1eC at Ctrtehogve ocafed az die inteisectron of School blouse Lane and Grilling Snect,CuWhogue,,-Town oftout d,8¢ifotk Ctitifg, ew York. The curreniproperty is-meant Sand. 7#tepits osed projcct4ncluda development of a.townbottsc complex,entitled the Heritagt et Gufetieg iE;dis;4%sfl idas.a..senior&only esttibtis This establishment will create Approximately 1.39 units in 131-4baF1ditrgs fwrcaidctsti>;tlxlx ru No sbildreo will showed to live in the complex 7tis-tteAritsm oft#ins letter toAv1icit ymwtriput-cepar&Z this proj and its impacts on the scbool. Please confirm that the vide any comments or information that you Teel arc of importance. Yourmsponse will be included in the DEIS. If no response by Maj 36 we will essume thar6 af6 riot objections to the projecL 11t4ink you for your assistance in this matter. Please feet f e to call mat at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this regue9L ve truly yours, Gff AN-�PEEDERR�SEN,INC- Keith Holley Environwearw wentisf v THIS PROJECT WILL NOT BE IN THE SOUTHOLD D916151 ME SCHOOL DISTRCT. DR. CHRISTOP9911 =LAGHER SUPERINTENDENT o:�ao1>zom3�mcorreapo�a�cc5$omi,old uFsn.ao� 335 V&St Vain Street,sebylen,W 11702 Tal: (831)$87.5060 Fax: (831)422-3479 www.gpinst.corn 1 1 Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services October 17, 2007 Suffolk County Water Authority. 4060 Sunrise Highway Oakdale,New York 11769 Attu: Mr. Steve Bums Re: Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46+/-Acre Parcel at Comer of School House Lane and Griffing Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concem: This firm is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Griffmng Street, Cutchogue,Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The current property is vacant land. The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse complex,entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue, designated as a seniors only establishment This establishment will create 139 units in 131 buildings along with a clubhouse and maintenance garage. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impacts on the utilities in the area Please provide any comments or information that you feel are of importance. Your response will be included in the DEIS. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to call mat at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request Very truly yours, GREEE'NM,,AN-PEDERSEN,INC. 7�l y Environmental Scientist 0:\2007\2007340\Conespondmmc SCWAdoe 325 West Main Street,.Babylon, NY 11702 Tel: (631)587-5060 Fax: (631)422-3479 www.gpinet.com Ix SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Stephen M. Jones Chief Executive Officer Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 11769-0901 (631)563-0219 Fax (631)563-0370 December 12, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SEQRA - The Heritage at Cutchogue, SCTM# 1000-102-1-33.3 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Iwouldlike to thankyou for the opportunityto comment on the EAF application for the above referenced project. The SCWA offers the following comments as itpertains to the proposed application As you know,the SCWA's mission is to provide qualitydrinkingwater at an affordableprice to all ofourresidents. Implementingenvironmentallyfnendlypesticide water practices and conserving our supply today is integral in assuring that we have adequate qualitywaterfo generations This particularlyholds true for the Town of Southold where water supplyis limitedand there is a large impact to shallow aquifers. The SCWA strongly urees that the Town of Southold impose conditions on this project requu7ng the use of low flowplumbing fixtures in accordance with the latest codes,permitting the irrigation of only 15%of the area of any single lot(automatic irrigation systems maypose pressure problems inthis project area)and also adoptingmethods to reducethepotential ofdegadedwaterfrom recharging to the aquifer. 's Page Two December 12, 2006 These recommendations are consistent with the SCWA's Water SupplyPlan fortheTown.of Southold and shouldbe conditions memorializedinthe form ofCovenants andRestric ionsrecordedwith the Suffolk County Clerk. The SCWA will not issue a letter ofwater availabilityforthis projectuntil suchbme as theTown of Southold has reviewed and approved Us project inaccordancewith the Town ofSouthold's 1 anniri and development requirements and the SCWA's Water Supply Plan for the Town of Southold.g Additional' mformationonthis a Lica ' pp honmaybesenttoKimberlyKennedyat4060Sunrise Hi wa � Y, Oakdale,NY 11769 _ Thank you. V urs, t . Jones ecutive Officer SMJ/kk SVF ]FOL.K COUNTY WATER AVTHORITY SPK officer Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 11769-0901 Chief Executivewe OfFcer - ' (631) 563-0219 Fax(631) 563-0370 August 14, 2007 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SEQRA - The Heritage at Cutchogue, SCTM# 1000-102-1-33.3 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: To clear up any misconceptions on `water availability", please be advised that my letter of December 12, 2006 still stands, wherein I clearly state we will not issue a water availability letter until after site plan approval. A more recent letter from our New Service Department to the applicant is a cost estimate letter which we occasionally provide to developers. This is not to be confused with a water availability letter which has not been issued. - Very� o L . Step . J es Chief Executive Officer SMJ/kk 2006 National Source water Proteoom Award VMW SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 4060 Sunrise Highway, P.O.Box 38, Oakdale, New York 11769 October 15, 2007 Mr. Dale Grippo, VP Construction Heritage at Cutchogue, LLC 1721-D North Ocean Ave Medford NY 11763 Re: 115-4707586 Heritage at Cutchogue Dear Mr. Grippo: Reference is made to our meeting on September 17,2007, regarding availability of providing water service to the existing homes, as per the BOH requirements on the following streets. (sketch enclosed) • Highland Rd. south from house#1498 to Main Rd. • East on Main Rd.to Griffing St. stopping at last commercial building. • Continue east on Main Rd to North St.stopping at last commercial building. Depot Ln. to end of School House Ln. g In order to serve the above streets, a water main extension of approximately 5,279 feet would be required. The water main could be installed under the terms of our Construction Contract plan. At this time, due to a price increase for the 2008 construction season, we cannot furnish you with the cost. We should be able to provide agreements and detailed costs after December 1, 2007. For each existing home (52 total), that signs our Suffolk County Water Authority Public Water Main Extension Agreement and Service Application and furnishes their own check for payment, the equivalent of the 75'allowance can be deducted from your contract total. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 631-563-5672 if you have any questions, Monday thru Friday 8:00am—5:00pm Sincerely, Lisa Cetta Assistant Manager New Service LC:drh C. cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services 360 Yaphank Avenue, Suite SC Yaphank, NY 11980 Attn: Bob Farmer 2006 National Source Water Protection Award Winner i SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Stephen M.Jones Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 117 Chief Executive O69-Og01 Officer (631) 563-0219 Fax (631) 563-0370 November 6, 2007 Mr. Keith Holley Environmental Scientist Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 325 West Main Street Babylon, NY 11703 Re: Heritage @ Cutchogue- Town of Southold SCTM# 1000-102.00-01.00-033.003 Dear Mr. Holley: While we had provided prior correspondence on the above proposal,copies of which are attached for reference, we would also like to call your attention to pending legislation now under consideration by the Suffolk County government. I am enclosing a copy of that legislation, introduced by Legislatorlosquadro which establishes auniform standard forwater main installation. Currently the developer has the option of installing one large meter on the perimeter of the project and then installing all of the internal piping. Under this scenario,the developers or HOA would need to maintain the system at their cost and expense. As an alternative,we would suggest that the project use internal piping standards that we would use and further that individual services be metered. If this option is chosen, after construction, SCWA would be granted an easement to allow SCWA to own, operate and maintain the entire system at SCWA> s cost and expense. While it is the developer's choice to do the internal work privately with a large meter set and tum the system over to an HOA or the like, we believe that makingthe eat art of our s PmJ P tem with internal.individual_metering. wi1L insure a hi y high quality- system is installed and protect future homeowners from unnecessWmaintenance costs and overhead Again,we saythis is NOT currently a requirement of either SCWA or the SCDHS, but based on past history in these situations, an internal public water system with individual meters will promote water conservation, cut down on wasteful.practice and eliminate future maintenance charges to the homeowners or their association. li 2006 National Source water Protection Award winner \ e Page Two November 6, 2007 The Town of Southold may elect,via SEQRA,to make this a mitigating requirement in an effort to promote water conservation and protect future homeowners from unnecessary expense. We have not quoted any costs to the developers for an internal system built to our standards,only for public water main extensions off site to get to a large meter set at the development entrance.We would be happy to provide such additional cost estimates if requested. V�YWke Steps Officer SMJ:kk cc: Herman Miller, Deputy CEO, Operations Southold Planning Board Lisa Cetta, CM New Service P. Ponturo, SCDHS Hon.Daniel Losquadro z - UPDATED VERSION AS OF 9/19/2007 Intro. Res. No. 1945-2007 Introduced by Legislator Losquadro Laid on Table 9/20/2007 RESOLUTION NO. -2007, ADOPTING LOCAL LAW NO. 2007, A LOCAL LAW TO REQUIRE UNIFORM DRINKING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STANDARDS IN SUFFOLK COUNTY held an WHEREAS, there was duly presented and introduced to this County Legislature at a meeting , 2007, a proposed local law entitled, "A LOCAL LAW TO REQUIRE UNIFORM DRINKING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STANDARDS IN SUFFOLK COUNTY;" now, therefore be it RESOLVED, that said local law be enacted in form as follows: LOCAL LAW NO. -2007, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK A LOCAL LAW TO REQUIRE UNIFORM DRINKING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STANDARDS IN SUFFOLK COUNTY follows: BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNTY LEGISLATURE OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, as Section 1 Legislative Intent This Legislature hereby finds and determines that there is currently no uniform standard for drinking water distribution systems that extend beyond the public water mains into residential developments or condominium units. This Legislature also finds and determines that by not installing drinking water distribution systems to a uniform standard, residents of residential housing developments or condominiums bear the risk of faulty systems, and must absorb an exorbitant cost if these systems fail in the future. This Legislature also finds that these non-standard drinking water distribution systems are often not up to the same health standards as those required by a public water authorityeby putting residents at a substantial health risk. , ther This Legislature further finds and determines that in the event that residents of a residential housing development or condominium choose at a later date to have their water supply connected to a Public system, whether the Suffolk County Water Authority or another water authority in the County, these residents must pay a heavy cost to have their water distribution systems brought up to the same standards as the public water authority. This Legislature finds that the residents of the County would be best served by requiring the installation of drinking water distribution systems that meet the same standards as those required by public water authorities from the commencement of construction of any residential housing development in Suffolk County. Therefore, the purpose of this law is to require a uniform drinking water distribution standard throughout Suffolk County. Section 2 Requirements Pursuant to Article 9, § 2(C) 10, of the New York State Constitution, governing protection, health, safety, and well-being of persons, all drinking water distribution systems installed throughout Suffolk County shall conform to the following standards: http://www.co.suffolk.ny.us/legis/resos2007/i1945-07.htm 11/6/2007 A. All four (4) inch, six (6) inch, eight (8) inch, ten (10) inch, and twelve (12) inch, inside nominal diameter, ductile-iron, cement-lined pipe shall be Class 52 "Tyton" type joint, centrifugal cast Pressure pipe for water. Sixteen (16) inch ductile-iron, cement lined pipe and twenty four (24) inch ductile-iron, cement lined pipe shall be Ductile Iron Class 51. All such pipe shall be ductile iron pipe centrifugally cast in metal molds or sand lined molds conforming to the latest edition of American National Standards InstitutelAmerican Water Works Association (ANSI/AWWA) C 151/A21.51. The interior of the pipe shall be cement mortar lined in accordance with the latest edition of ANSI/AWWA C151/A21.51 double thickness and then seal coated on the exposed surface of the lining v✓ith bituminous coating. All such pipe used must be listed as ANSI/NSF 61 approved in regard to coatings and cement linings. Any "Tyton" or "Super Bell-Tite type joint, ductue-iron pipe may be furnished in either eighteen (18) or twenty (20) foot laying lengths. For any Pressure Class 350 ductile iron pipe, the preceding shall apply, except that said pipe shall be Pressure Class 350 in lieu of Class 52. B. All four (4) inch, six (6) inch, eight (8) inch ten (10) inch, and twelve (12) inch nominal-inside diameter, poly vinyl chloride (PVC) pressure pipe shall be as manufactured by Johns-Mannville, or an equivalent manufacturer, Class 150, and shall have a standard dimension ratio (S.D.R.) of 18and conform to the latest edition of American Water Works Association (AWWA) C900. The outside diameter of said PVC pipe shall be the same as that of the same nominal size of cast-iron or ductile- iron pipe so that no special adaptation is necessary to connect to cast-iron or ductile-iron valves and fittings. Said PVC pipe shall be only of integral bell and plain end lengths. Each standard and random length of said PVC pipe shall be tested to 600 psi for the minimum dwell of five (5)seconds_ All such PVC pipe shall be furnished with mechanical pipe (cast iron) gaskets. Detectable Metallic Underground Tape, a minimum of 2 inches wide, marked for "Water" shall also be installed 1 foot above the top of any such PVC pipe. C. All ductile iron fittings shall be in accordance with the latest edition of American Water Works Association Standard Specifications(AWWA C110)for ductile iron pressure fittings, mechanical joint, short fittings shall begs rated at ttar ed out0side and cement si, American Jlinional ed inside in accordance the(ANSI) A21.10. All such testt edition of • AWWA Specification C104. D. All compact fittings shall be in accordance with the latest edition of American Water Works Association Standard Specifications for ductile iron compact fittings, mechanical joint, rated at 350 psi, AWWA C153/A21.53. All such fittings shall be tar coated outside and cement lined inside in accordance with the latest edition of AWWA Specifications C104. Section 3 Enforcement The provisions of this law shall be enforced by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, which Department may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction for an injunction to prevent the violation, or threatened violation, thereof, or which department shall proceed in any manner authorized by law to secure compliance with the provisions of this law. Section 4 Rules and Regulations The Commissioner of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is hereby authorized and empowered to promulgate and issue such rules and regulations as he or she deems necessary to implement and carry out the provisions of this law. Section 5 Aooiicabi itv -.- - — _ This law shall apply to all actions occurring on or after the effective date of this law. Section 6 Severability If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law or the application httP=//Www.co.suffolk-ny.u-%4egis/resos2007/i1945-07.htm 11/6/2007 thereof to any person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such order or judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law, or in its application to the person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance directly involved in the controversy in which such order or judgment shall be rendered. Section 7 SEQRA Determination This Legislature, being the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) lead agency, hereby finds and determines that this law constitutes a Type II action pursuant to Section 617.5(c)(20), (21), and/or(27)of Title 6 of the NEW YORK CODE OF RULES AND REGULATIONS (6 NYCRR) and-within the meaning of Section 8-0109(2) of the NEW YORK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW as a promulgation of regulations, rules, policies, procedures, and legislative decisions in connection with continuing agency administration, management and information collection. The Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is hereby directed to circulate any appropriate SEQRA tices noof determination of non-applicability or non-significance in accordance with this law. Section 8 Effective Date This law shall take effect on the ninetieth (90th) day immediately subsequent to filing in the Office of the Secretary of State. • DATED: APPROVED BY: County Executive of Suffolk County Date: ham'//°r'w-w.co•suffoBc.nyu-gA%is resos2007/il945-07.htm 1116/2007 J" Greenman - Pedersen, Inc.. Engineering and Construction Services October 17,2007 KeySpan Energy Ops.2;2"d Floor T&D Project Management 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville,Newyork 11801 Attn:Mr.John Asaro Re:Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46+/-Acre Parcel at Comer of School House Lane and Griffing Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concern: This firm is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Griffing Street,Catchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The current property is vacant land The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse complex,entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue, designated as a seniors only establishment. This establishment will create approximately 139 units in 131 buildings for residents 60 and over. There will also be a Clubhouse and Maintenance facility on the site. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impacts on the utilities in the area Please provide any comments or information that you feel are of importance. Your response will be included in the DEIS. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to call mat at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request. Very truly yours, GREENtMAN-PEDERSEN,INC. Keith Holley Environmental Scientist 0:\2007\2007340\Cor pondmce\LIPA-KeySpm.doe 325 West Main Street, Babylon, NY 11702 Tel: (631)587-5060 Fax: (634)422-3479 www.gpinet.com ArvnrjhF.']r7, N'.+ 110(�t •Inng and Power Amhonly December 18, 2007 BERI.TAGE @ CUTCHOGUE 1721 D. NO OCEAN AVENUE. MEDFORD, NY 11763 RL-: HERITAGE @ CUTCI-IOGUL- CUTCHOGUE Ref. :,' T100800721 To whom it may concern: This letter of agreement is in response to your request for gas and electric facilities for the above referenced project. Based on your plans to build 139 dwelling units, your planning costs for both the refundable and non-refundable portions of the electric facilities are provided in Options 1-4 in the Electric Contribution Summary. The costs for the gas facilities are totally refundable based on your compliance with Option A or B under the Gas Contribution Summary. For your planning purposes and approval, enclosed is a copy of"Exhibit A" which represents the route and extent of our proposed electric and gas facilities- ELECTRIC CONTRIBUTION SUMMARY KeySpan/LIPA has calculated the contribution associated with your project. The calculations have been developed to cover your payment options. Option 1. Connection, distribution and services trenched and installed by KeySpan/LIPA. Option 2. Connection, distribution and services within the free allovrance Irenched and installed by J<eySpan/LIPA, with Builder trenched and installed electric services in excess of the free allowance. (Builder may install electric services in KeySpan's gas service trench.) Option 3. Connection trenched and installed by KeySpan/LIPA_ .Distribution and services trenched b Builder and installed b Ke S an/LI.PA. y Y Y P Option 4 Connection trenched and installed by KeySpan/LIPA. Distribution trenched by Builder and installed by KeySpan/LIPA. Electric services within the free allowance trenched by Builder and installed by LIPA, with services in excess of the free allowance trenched and installed by Builder. (KeySpan may install gas services in Builder electric service trench.) Page 2 Ref. n 7100800721 Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Qption 4 10% Design Payment $ 15,660.99 $ 13,218,06 5 13,218.06 $ 13,218.06 401/6 Material Payment $ 62,643.99 $ 52,872.26 $ 52,872.26 $ 52,872.26 50% Construction Payment $ 78.305.00 $ 66,090.33 $ 66.090.33 .a 66,090.33 TOTAL S 156,609.98 S 132,180.65 1 132,180.65 3 132,180.65 Refundable S 1.21,250.80 $ 121,250.80 5 121.250.80 5 121,250.80 Non-Refundable $ 35,359.18 $ 10,929.85 $ 10,929.85 S 10,929.85 Projected Remaining Trenching Reimbursement $ N/A $ N/A $ 58,303.55 a 80,793.15 Service Footage Installed by 6,255' 4,498' 6,255' 4,_498' KeySpan/LIPA: GAS CONTRI[3UTTON SUMN(ARY The costs to run the gas facilities for the project are: 1. $ 0.00 Non-Refundable charge for facilities in excess of tariff allowances. This cost must be paid to KeySpan prior to the start of construction and is not reimbursable_ II. 5396,855.40 Refundable charge for facilities that are within tariff allowancc;s. See Option A and B below for payment options for the refundable charges_ Option A: Sign the Gas Waiver Agreement (See Attachment 2). This agreement waives the front of the refundable gas charges based on your commitment to install gas space heating in all of your dwellings, Option B: Pay the refundable charges prior to construction of the gas facilities. 'This will be a lump sum payment that v611 be reimbursed on a house by house basi.s, until the required number of dwellings have been completed. (See Attachment 2) G.ENERAL REQUIREMEi\'TS This project will qualify for installation when the following items have been satisfied: 1. Full payment has been received by KeySpan/LIPA for all gas and electric facilities. Page 3 Ref. # 7100800721 2. You have provided a clear, unobstructed casement or right-of-way graded to within six (6) inches of final grade.. 3. You have installed curbs and all other proposed underground facilities such as sewers, drainage, water mains and water taps. Ke.ySpan/LIPA's electric and gas installations are made jointly with Verizon. You should schedule roadway pavement and sidewalks to follow our installation. Proper sequencing of your construction and compliance with our requirements will aid us in meeting your schedule. When six (6) inches of frost is encountered, additional charges are imposed for the installation of new gas and electric services. Gas and electric installations will cease when frost exceeds eighteen (18) inches. In addition, the Builder shall be responsible for all repair and/or replacement costs associated with damaged LIPA underground electric distribution facilities, i.e, splice boxes, transformers, cable., etc., which occur during the construction phases of the project. This also includes the cost of any additional excavation work, resulting from the Build.er's excavations or re-grading of the construction site. The Builder's Performance Refund shall be deferred, or forfeited, until such time that all identified charges for these LIPA costs are paid. You may elect to perform the distribution and service trenching necessary for the installation of the facilities in the subject subdivision. The refund per trench foot for service laterals is 95.25 and 95.20 per trench foot for distribution, provided all work is performed in accordance with KevSpan/LIPA specifications and schedules. Please contact the representative below for an appointment to discuss this option in further detail. Please be advised that all computations are based upon our gas and electric tariffs. Any applicable tariff changes shall become part of this agreement and may affect the final cost of installation. KeySpan/LIPA reserves the right to recalculate your contribution in accordance with any such changes. if you have no comment on "Exhibit A", notify your Business Lead of your selected option and remit the 10% design payment, along with the Gas Waiver Agreement (if applicable) so we may proc-eed with the detailed design phase of your project. Please be advised that any amounts over 51,000.00 must be paid by certified or cashier's check. Page 4 Ref 4 T100800721 For this project., Mr. John .Merrill is the assigned Business Lead and can be reached .at 753-5157. As your Electrical Technical Lead, I can be reached at 548-7062 to address any questions/concerns. q ns. Very truly yours, -ems Z�12�� ' Steven Aylwayfl Design Supervisor Electric Design & Construction Enclosure S Alam cc: Tom Salvino John Merrill Page 5 Ref. '1r T100S00721 ELECTRIC CONTRIBUTION - ATTACI3T ENT 1. In accordance with the Company's filed tariff; we are requesting that performance payments be made for dwelling units when there are no secured sales contracts. This policy was instituted to provide LLPA with the assurance that installed facilities will be utilized. These performance payments will be equal to 50% of LIPA's underground free allowance portion of the installation. These performance payments will be refunded on a pro-rata basis with interest compounded annually, as units are connected to our electric facilities. Interest rates are set annually. The refund term will be up to five years from the date LIPA's facilities are available for service. In order to process these refunds, we Will require your Tax ID nu nber. FILED RATES AND INFORMATION CONNECTION DISTRIBUTION SERVICIE_ • RUD Charges $23.20/Ft. 19.60/Ft. S 12.80/Ft. Pad mounted above-ground transformers are the Company standard installation. Any requests or municipal requirements for below-grade transformers will be subject to an additional payment of$559.00/transformer, plus sales tax. Free allowance - 100 Ft./Dwelling Unit with a secured sales contract or when connected to our facilities. L.IPA will pay interest on all refundable monies at the applicable annual rate specified on a Statement of Interest on Customer Deposits to be prepared and maintained on file by LIPA. The rate will be updated on January 1 of each year to reflect current market conditions. The 10% design payment is non-refundable if the project is canceled, otherwise it is applied as part of the developer's total payment. Any requested changes to a completed design will incur a design payment surcharge not applied to the total payment. Page 6 Ref 4 T100800721 Option 1 The following is a breakdown of your contribution towards the cost for the underground electric facilities for KeySpanLLIPA to perform all work including trenching for connection, distribution and services. A- REFUNDABLE ELECTRIC PERFORNJ.AN('E PAYIl4ENT Connection 180 Ft x 523.20 x. 50% $ 2,088.00 Distribution 9222 Ft x $19.60 x 50% $ 90,375.60 Service 4498 Ft x $12.80 x 50410 $ 28,787.20 SUB-TOTAL $ 121,250.80 B. NON-REFUNDABLE EL ECTRT.0 CHARGES Excess Distribution (0 Ft x $19.60 ) $ 0.00 Excess SerVice (1757 Ft x 512.80 ) S 22,489.60 Below Grade Transformer (18 BG's x $559) $ 101062.00 Non-Residential Charge $ 0,00 8 625% Salcs Tax $ 2,807.58 SUB-TOTAL $ 35,359.18 C. TOTAL ELI;CTRTC PAYMENT WITHOUT SALES CONTRACTS TOTAL $ 156,609.98 D. ELECTRTC PAYMENT SCHEDULE Design Payment 100/0 of(C) $ 15,660.99 Material Payment 40% of(C) $ 62,64199 Construction Payment 50% of(C) $ 78.305.00 (A credit of$872.31 /D.U. will apply towards the Performance Payment for secured sales contracts at this payment.] E. FUTURE REFUNDS OF PERFORMANCE PAYMENT $ 872.31 /D.0 In no event shall the credit for secured sales contracts, plus future refunds, less interest, exceed the total Refundable Performance Payment (A) In order to process these refunds, we will require your Tax ID numbeR-. Page 1 Ref Ii 710080072] I Option 2 The following is a breakdown of your contribution towards the cost for the underground electric facilities for KevSpan/LIPA 10 perform all work-associated with the trenching and installation of connection, distribution and service within the free allowance., with Builder trenched and installed electric services in excess of the free allowance. (.Builder may install electric services in KeySpan's gas service trenches.) A_ REFUNDABLE .CLC_CTRIC PERFORMANCE PAYMENT Connection 1 80 Ft x 523.20 x 50% $ 2,088 00 Distribution 9222 Ft x $19.60 x 50% $ 90,375.60 Service 4498 Ft x $12.80 x 50% S 28,787.20 SUB-TOTAL $ 121,250 80 B. NON-REFLINDABLE ELECTRIC CHARGES Excess Distribution (0 Ft x $19.60) $ 000 Excess Service (N/A Ft x $12.80) $ 000 Below Grade Transformer (18 BG's x $559) $ 10,062.00 Non-Residential Charge $ 0.00 8 625% Sales Tax S 867.85 SUB-TOTAL $ 10,929.85 C. TOTAL.ELECTRIC PAYMENT WITHOUT SALES CONTRACTS TOTAL $ 132, 180.65 D. ELECTRIC PAYNTENT SCHEDULE Design Payment 10% of(C) $ 13,218.06 Material Payment 40% of(C) $ 52,872.26 Construction Payment 50% of(C) $ 66,090.33 (A credit of$872.31 /D.U. will apply towards the Performance Payment for secured sales contracts at this payment.) E. FUTURE PEVUNDS OF PERFORMANCE PAYMENT $ 872.31 /D.U. In no event shall the credit for secured sales contracts, plus future refunds, less interest, exceed the total Refundable Performance Payment (A). In order to process these refunds, we will require your Tax .ID number_ Page 8 Ref. O 7100800721 Option 3 The following is a breakdown of your contribution towards the cost for the underground electric facilities for KeySpan/LIPA to trench and install all connection, and install all distribution and services, with Builder providing all distribution and service. trenching. A. REFUNDABLE ELECTRIC PERFORMANCE PAYMENT � Connection 180 Ft x $23.20 x 50% S 2,088 00 Distribution 9222 Ft x $19.60 x 50% $ 90,375 60 Service 4498 Ft x $12,80 x 50% S 28,787.20 SUB-TOT,AJ_ $ 121,250.80 E_ NON-REFUNDABLE ELT, CTRTC CHARGES Excess Distribution (0 Ft x $14.40) S 0.00 Excess Service (1757 Ft x 57.55) $ 13,265.35 Excess Footage Charge $ 13,265 35 Reduction Based on Trenching $ (13,265.3.5) Below Grade Transformer (18 BG's x $559) $ 10,062 00 Non-Residential Charge S 0.00 8.625% Sales Tax $ 867.85 SUB-TOTAL $ 10,929.85 C. TOTAL ,ELECTRIC PAYMENT WITHOUT SALES CONTRACTS TOTAL $ 132,180 65 D. ELECTRIC PAYMENT SCHEDULI's Design Payment 10% of(C) $ 13,218 06 Material Payment 40% of(C) $ 52,872 26 Construction Payment 50% of(C) $ 66,090 33 (A credit of 5872.31 /D.U. will apply towards the Performance Payment for secured sales contracts at this payment.) E. FUTURE REFUNDS OF PERFORMANCE PAYMENT .S 872.31 /D.U. In no event shall the credit for secured sales contracts, plus future refunds, less interest, exceed the total Refundable Performance Payment (A). In order to process these refunds, we will require your Tax TD number. Page 9 • Refff 7100800721 Option 3 (Cont'd.) F. PROJECTED TRENCHING REIMBURSEMENT Upon successful completion of the trenching by the Builder for the installation of both KeySpart/LIPA's gas and electric facilities, KeySpan/LIPA will make the reimbursement as follows: Based on 9222 Ft, of distribution allowance trench, this will equate to 9222 Ft. x $5.20 = $47,954.40 .Based on 4498 Ft, of service allowance trench, this will equate to 4493 Ft. x 55.25 = $23,614.50 Total Trenching Allowance; S 71,568.90 Credit Already Applied to Excess Charge: S 13,265.35 Projected Remaining Trenching Reimbursement: S 58,303.55 Page ID Ref. 4 'T100800721 • Option 4 The following is a breakdown of your contribution towards the cost of underground electric facilities for KeySpan/LfPA to trench and install all connection- Distribution trenched by Builder and installed by KeySpan/LIPA. Electric services within the free allowance trenched by Builder and installed by KeySpan/L1PA, with services in excess of the free allowance trenched a.nd installed by Builder. (KeySpan may install gas services in Builder's electric service trench. The Builder may be reimbursed for trenching a. specified in Section F below.) A. REFUNDABLE ELECTRIC PERFORMANCE PAYMENT Connection 180 Ft x $23.20 x 501io $ 2,088,00 Distribution 9222 Ft x $19.60 x 50% $ 90,375.60 Service 4498 Ft x 512.80 x 501,% $ 28,787.20 SUB-TOTAL $ 121,250.80 B. NON-REFUNDABLE ELECTRIC CHARGES Excess Distribution (0 Ft x $14.40) $ 0.00 Excess Service (N/A Ft x $7.55) $ 0.00 Excess Footage Charge $ 0.00 Reduction Based on Trenching $ 0.00 Below Cnade Transformer (18 Bus x $559) $ 10,06200 Non-ResidentialChar e $ 0.00 g 8.625% Sales Tax $ 867,85 SUB-TOTAL $ 10,924.85 C- TOTAL ELEC'T'RIC PAYMENT WITHOUT SALES CONTRACTS TOTAL $ 132,180.65 D. ELECTRIC PAYTfENT SCHEDULE Design Payment 10% of(C) S 13,218.06 Material Payment 40% of(C) $ 52,872.26 Construction Payment 50% of(C) $ 66,090.33 [A credit of$872.31 /D.U. will apply towards the Performance Payment for secured sales contracts at this payment) E. FUTURE REFUNDS OF PERFORMANCE PAYMENT $ 872.31 /D.0 In no event shall the credit for secured sales contracts, plus future refunds, less interest, exceed the total Refundable Performance Payment (A). In order to process these refunds, we will require your Tax ED number. Page I 1 Ref dr T100800721 Option 4 (Cont'd.) ' I!. PROJECTED TRENCHING REIMBURSEMENT Upon successful completion of the trenching by the Builder for the installation of both KcvSpan/LiPA's gas and electric facilities, KeySpan/LIPA will make reimbursement as f0 II 0 w.s . Based on 9222 Ft of distribution allowance trench, this will equate to 9222 Ft. x $5.20 = $47,954.40 Based on 6255 Ft. of service trench within GAS allowance, this will equate to 6255 Ft. x $5.25 = ti 32,838.75 Total Trenching Credit Within Allowance: $ 80,793 15 Credit Already Applied to Excess Charge: $ 0.00 Projected Remaining Trenching Reimbursement: $ 80,793.1 5 • R GAS CONTRIBUTTON - AT TACIIMENT 2 In connection with the installation of gas mains, service lines, service connecto appurtenant facilities for 139 buildings the following bre: >akdown provides you calculations of your contribution toward the cost for the.. . se facilities: GAS MAIN CHARGE a) Total footage = 9,2 22 b) Cost per foot = S 32 02 c) Total cost = $ 295,288. 44 GAS SERVICE CHARGE d) Total footage 55 e) Cost per foot = $ ] 1 . .20 n Total Cost — $ 70,056 .00 SUMMATION OF GAS CHARGES Gas Mains $ 295,28S-, 44 Gas Services $ 70,056:.; 1.00 8.625% Sales Tal $ 31,51C.'. ).96 Total Cost $ 396,85`,` 40 The calculations quoted herein are in accordance with KeySpan's currently fil valid for 30 days from the date of this proposal. Page 13 Ref, 4T100800721 ATTAC)IMENT 2 (Cont'd.) GAS CONTIUBLITION PAYMENT OPTIONS NON-REFUNDABLE CHARGES_ The non-refundable charges to supply gas facilities to your project are: S 0.00 RErUNDABLE CHARGES: The refundable charges to supply gas facilities to your project are: $396,855.40 KeySpan provides the following payment options for these charges: A Gas Waiver Agreement KeySpan agrees to waive the requirement for the gas advance payment of the refundable charges, if the Builder commits to install gas space heating in all of the buildings for this project. Signing for this option commits the Builder to install gas space heating in all 139 units planned for this project within 5 years of the date of this agreement. it also commits the Builder to reimburse KeySpan (1/139 x $ 396,855.40 = R 2,855.07 per unit for each building below that does not install gas space heating. Accepted By: Date:_ B. Advanced Payment with Reimbursements As the Builder, T. commit to paying the refundable charges prior to the start of construction with reimbursements being applied on a house by house basis in accordance.with the tariff based free footage allowances. All units must install gas space heating and be complete within 5 years of the datee of this agreement. Based on this requirement, the. Builder will be reimbursed at (1/139 x $ 396,855.40 = .$ 2,855.07 per unit, when installed. Accepted By: Date:_ R UD.LTF 1 1 Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services, October 17,2007 Town of Southold Police Department 41405 Route 25 Peconic,NY 11958 Re: Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46+/-Acre Parcel at Comer of School House Lane and Griffing Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concem: This firm is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Grif ing Street, Cutchogue,Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York The current property is currently vacant land. The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse complex, entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue,designated as a seniors only establishment. This establishment will create 139 units in 131 buildings along with a clubhouse and maintenance garage. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impacts on the department. Please confirm that the project will be serviced by your department and the identity which precinct will provide patrols. Also please provide any comments or information that you feel are of importance. Your response will be included in the DEIS. Tbank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to call mat at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request. Very truly yours, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,INC. Keith Holley Environmental Scientist 0:\2007\2007340\Couespondwce4Southold Potice.dm 325 West Main Street, Babylon, NY 11702. Tel: (631) 587-5060 Fax (631)422-3479 www.gpinetcom PIGreenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services May 12, 2008 Carlisle COchtan- Chief of Police Town of Southold Police Department 53095 Route 25 PO Box 1179 Pecoaic,NY 11958 Re: Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46 +/- Acre Parcel at Corner of School House Lane and Griffng Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concern: As stated in the previous letter of October 17, 2007, Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Grilling Street, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The proposed property is currently vacant land. The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse complex, entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue, designated as a seniors only establishment. This establishment will create 139 units in 131 buildings along with a clubhouse and maintenance garage. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impacts on the department. Please confirm that the project will be serviced by your department and the identity which precinct will provide patrols. Also please provide any comments or information that you feel are of importance. Your response will be included in the DEIS. If no response is received by May 30, 2008 it will be assumed that your department will be able to provide services for this project. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to call mat at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request. Very truly yours, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. l' Keith Holley 0:12007\2007340\CoRcspondence\Sonthold Police.doc Environmental Scientist 325 West Main Street, Babylon, NY 11702 Tel: (631)587-5060 Fax: (631)422-3479 www.gpinetcom GPIGreenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services May 12, 2008 Mattituck Cutchogue Union Free School District 3 85 Depot Rd Cutchogue,NY 11935 Re: Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46+/-Acre Parcel at Comer of School House Lane and tariffing Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concern: As stated in letter of October 17,2007,Greenman-Pedersen,Inc. is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Griffmg Street, Cutchogue, Town of.Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The current property is vacant land. The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse complex, entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue, designated as a seniors only establishment. This establishment will create approximately 139 units in 131 buildings for residents 60 and over. No children will be allowed to live in the complex. • It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impacts on the school. Please confirm that the project will be will be in your school district,and also please provide any comments or information that you feel are of importance. Your response will be included in the DEIS. If no response by May 30 we will assume there are not objections to the project. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to call mat at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request. Very truly yours, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,IN Keith Holley Environmental Scientist 0:\2007\2007340\Coy mpondencc\Southold UFSD.doe - 325 West Main Street, Babylon,NY 11702 Tel: (631) 587-5060 Fax: (631)422-3479 www.gpinet.com 'NUNI'll Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services October 17, 2007 Cutchogue Fire Department 260 New Suffolk Rd Cutchogue,NY 11935 Re:Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46+/-Acre Parcel at Comer of School House Lane and Griffmg Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 35.3 To Whom It May Concem: This firm is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Griffing Street, Cutchogue,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York. The current property is currently vacant land. The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse.complex, entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue,designated as a seniors only establishment Asart of the environmental amental review, we.are seeking information on public services, would appreciate your assistance in this regard. Please advise,in writing,on the following fire protection and L Verification the subject property is within your jurisdiction. Number of active members in the Cutchogue Fire Department Total number of fire and rescue calls responded to in 2006 Average response time for the department Location of the firehouse to the subject property Any information you think would be appropriate for our evaluation. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to call me at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request. Very truly yours, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,INC. Keith Holley Environmental Scientist 0:\2007\2007340\Corespondmce\Cutchogue F m.doc 325 West Main Street, Babylon, NY 11702 Tel: (631) 587-5060 Fax(631)422-3479 www.gpinet:com GPIGreenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services 6 May 12, 2008 Michael C Boken Cutchogue Fire Department 260 New Suffolk Rd. Cutchogue,NY 11935 Re: Proposed Development of the Heritage at Cutchogue 46+/-Acre Parcel at Corner of School House Lane and Griffmg Street Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York District 1000 Section 102 Block 01 Lot 33.3 To Whom It May Concern: As previously stated in letter of October 17,2007, Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. is in the process of preparing an environmental evaluation of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue located at the intersection of School House Lane and Griffmg Street, Cutchogue,Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The current property is currently vacant land. The proposed project includes the development of a townhouse complex, entitled the Heritage at Cutchogue, designated as a seniors only establishment. As part of the environmental review, we are seeking information on public services,including fire protection,and I would appreciate your assistance in this regard. Please advise, in writing, on the following: Verification the subject property is within your jurisdiction. Number of active members in the Cutchogue Fire Department Total number of fire and rescue calls responded to in 2006 Average response time for the department Location of the firehouse to the subject property Any information you think would be appropriate for our evaluation. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If we do not receive a response by May 30, 2008 we will assume your department can service the proposed project. Please feel free to call me at 631-761-7353 with any questions concerning this request. Very truly yours, G NMAN/-PEDERSEN,INC. -- _ Keith Holley Environmental Scientist 0:\2007\2007340\Correspondence\Cutchogue Fire.doc - 325 West Main Street, Babylon, NY 11702 Tel: (631) 587-5060 Fax: (631)422-3479 www.gpinet.com Appendix I Correspondence Correspondence with the Town of Southold Attorney's Office Regarding Zoning, March 29, 2007 Correspondence with the Applicant's Attorney and the Town Planning Board, July 16, 2007 Real Estate Valuation for Area of Proposed Easement, Andrew Stype Realty, Inc. October 3, 2007 • Existing Tax Information for the Subject Property Correspondence with the New York State Natural Heritage Program, December 24, 2007 Correspondence to the Town of Southold Planning Board, April 30, 2008 • CHARLES R. CUDDY Attorney at Law 445 Griffing Avenue Riverhead,New York 11901 Tel No.: (631)369-8200 Fax No.: (631)369-9080 TO: Jeffrey Rimland Fax it: 207-5974 TELECOPIER COVER SHEET Total Number of pages 2 including cover sheet. If transmission is faulty or incomplete,please inform us as soon as possible. Operator: Iwona Date: July 16,2007 Comments: Re: Cutchogue property Please see attached J.etter. • Charles R Cuddy This fax transmission together with materials farrowing are intended jar the person or pen.any named hereon and are considered co�dential infinmatiom /fyou hart received this transmission in error you are directed to return these materials imunediatdy by regular moil to the fender at the above address postage incurred for lite return Wit he paid by this firm. MAR. A 2007 9:57AM i N0, 422 P. 2 PATRICTA A-FxNNr1G.AN T Ataon� �OF 50Ulygo sc'oW �ss€z L RWHAN W-CORCORAN * Town Ball Anes,54376 Route 25 AS9YSTANT TOWN ATTORKRY d' P.O.Boz 1179 l4 n G t'=W@LoRn--outhold.nyus- ® yp SOahol&NOW York 11971-0969 LORI HULSE MONTEFUSCO Telephone(631)765-19ae ASSISTANT TOWN ATT Qp.NM � ' - Facsimile(681)765-8639 kri.monfel'ueco�wn,poiythold.xyyua OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTROLD March 29, 2007 Mr. Bruce Anderson, M.S., President Suffolk Environmental Consulting Services, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E 2322 Main Street P.O. Box 2003 Bridgehampton, NY 11932.2003 RE: The Heritage at Cutehogue Dear Mr. Anderson: • Please allow this letter to respond to r P you Inquiry about the the HD zoned parcel in Cutchogue known as-The He ' permitted density on , Chapter 280 of the Town Code (Attachmsrd 1)refers unit per 10,000 square feet schedule attached to With community water and sewer, in the HD zone. In this pro)ect, an achlal sewer system is not required by the Health Department because there will be Covenants and Restrictions filed on the parcel restricting occupancy to those age 55 and over. The aforementioned requirement in the Town Code for sewer will be satisfied by approval the Suffolk County Health Department that the septic requirements for the pof roject have been met Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your attention. eownN yours, A. Finn a PAFAk mey cc_ Charles Cuddy, Esq. Mr. Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Mr. Anthony Trezza, Senior Planner CHARLES R.CUDDY ATTORNEY s1T LAW 445 GRIM—NG AV F.NUV RIVL•RIiF.A.D,Nrtb YORK MA na A�'w TEL: (631),W-8" P.O.Bo: 1547 FAX: (631.)369-9(18) Rivechcacl. NY 1.1,901 E-mail; cha.ric.S.eucl<ly(U)vnriznn.net July 16, 2007 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairman of Southold Planning Board Southold Town P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: The }Heritage at Cutchogue S CTM6#1000-102-1-33.3 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: My client has spent substantial time and resources in connection with the site plan application and SEQRA proceedings.I havebeen informed that despite significant mitigation and appropriate studies completed by the applicant,the Board intends to adopt a positive declaration under SEQRA.This ignores significant facts: 1. The applicant,pursuant to discussion with the Town Board,reduced the total number of units at • the site by 20%; 2. The applicant, in mitigation of traffic and other concerns,agreed to a 55 and older community; 3. The applicant agreed to individual condominium units; 4. The applicant worked out a price point offering to accommodate concerns of Town officials; 5. While believing it would assist in traffic dispersement,the applicant bas agreed to a limited use of the Spur Road connection; 6.The applicant presented a complete traffic analysis by the engineering firm of Nelson&Pope and had this reviewed and endorsedby Duou Engineering Associates,which clearly evidenced a small impact by the over 55 condominium use; 7. The Environmental Consultant hired by the Planning Board to complete an environmental analysis has determined that in every category under SEQRA there is a small to moderate impact, effectively recommending a negative declaration; The history of this site indicates that)t has been zoned for the proposed use for,nearly 25 years and that the zoning has been reviewed on a number of occasions by the Town Board and found to be appropriate. The zoning is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan which was subject to a Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Peconic Landing, a project of greater size but similar density and with the same zoning, received a negative declaration from the Planning Board. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairman of Southold Planning.Board July 16,2007 Page 2 I was advised at the Planning Board meeting of July 2,2007,that the basis for a positive declaration included: 1. traffic 2_ septic system location 3_ archeological 4. habitat These concerns do not stand up to scrutiny. The traffic analysis has not included one study but two. I'm not aware of any study conducted by the Town that is contrary to what was provided. The septic issue is clearly a health department matter,with the applicant having received preliminary approval from that department (not parenthetically the Town Board has adopted a resolution extending public water to School House Lane and the residents of Highland Road have public water available to them)_ The archeological request to further investigate the site is remarkable in that it is an inland site and at least three (3)large sites in Southold Town that I'm personally familiar with, including Fort Corehoug„have not produced any significant archeological findings. ® As to the habitat, this was examined by your environmental consultant. There is no basis for concluding that any one of the above concerns affects or will result in a substantial adversechange inthe community,the criteriafor determining significance under SEQRA as set forth at 6 lYYCRR Part 617. In each of these instances the Planners are second guessing and the worst second guessing is a rejection of your own environmental consultant's recommendation. I submit that this rejection is improper, improvident and contrary to law. The question must be asked. If the Planners are more qualified then why was the consultant retained.Assuming the consultant was qualified then by what methodology does the department override its own expert? I urge you to revisit this matter and not adopt a positive declaration. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ik Andrew Stype Realty, Inc. 12985 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 63, MATTITUCK. NEW YORK 11952 (631) 298-8760 FAX (631) 298-5779 www.stype.com � -- . 10/3/07 Mr. Jeffrey Riniland c/o Heritage at Cutchogue 1721.-D North Ocean Avenue Medford, NY 11763 Re:Barbara Grattan property Depot Lane, Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM 1000-102-1.-9.2 • Dear Jeff: In accordance with your request I am preparing a summary report of a real estate valuation of a portion of the subject property referenced above. The instructions are to indicate current fair value of a 67' x 635' ( 42,545 sq.') strip of land located at the north end of Mrs. Grattan's farm located at Depot Lane, Cutchogue, NY. The intended use is to determine the market value of the potential purchase to allow a right of way from Depot Road. to property owned by the Heritage at Cutchogue. The valuation is effective the inspection date of 10/2/07. The intended user/client is Teff Rimland and the Heritage at Cutchogue. This is a bypothetical condition. The right of way is proposed but appears to be a potentially viable, permitted use by the Town of Southold. The owner is listed as Barbara Grattan_ The subject parcel to be appraised is 67' x 635' (approximately 1 acre). The parcel is currently unimproved, open, fallowlands (formerly farmlands). The topography is gently rolling. The parcel is not in. a flood area. The client desires to purchase this parcel to allow ingress of construction vehicles for their proposed condominium project on the land adjoining the subject. Once completed the right of way may revert to a secondary ingress and egress of homeowners in the condo project. The subject has three other entrances to their project but may need a alternative entrance. The subject right of way would.notbe considered buildable except for a �� paved roadway. i Heritage - page 2 The subject parcel is part of a 25.6 acre farm. The loss to the owner appears to be minimal. The fain has development rights intact. The current (before the taking) maximum yield is 13 homesites (80,000 sq.' per homesite) according to R-80 zoning. The after taking would allow a maximum yield of 13 homesites. Upon consideration for current market trends and sales data the subject would indicate a current fair market value of: $ 80,000. Subject Market Value Thank you, please let me know if I can be of further assistance. ASREATDS:tI; � # 46000022831 • 13eritage - page 3 Market Data Sales Reviewed: The following are right of way type parcels, not considered buildable for single family homes and are located.on the North Fork: 1) North Road, Southold, 1000-52-2-37, .75 acre ( 25' x 1,300'), used as a road, sold on 10/21/05 for $ 75,000. 2) Edwards Lane, Orient, 1000-18-3-6.16, 1.8 acres ( 50' x 1,643'), used as a road, sold on 4/4/06 for $ 75,000. 3) Rte. 25A, Wading River, 600-57-2-6.2, Al acre ( 4l.' x 435'), right of way, sold on 3/23/07 for $ 75,000. The value indicated for the subject is $ 75,000. I also reviewed the following sales of vacant homesites sold in town of Southold this year. All lots are considered buildable for single family homes: • 4) Hillcrest Drive, Orient, 1.000-13-2-8.4, .92 acre, unimproved, sold on 4110/07 for $ 345,000. 5) Bridge Lane, Cutchogue, 1000-85-2-24, _98 acre, unimproved, sold on 4/4/07 for $ 345,000. 6) Leeward Dr., Southold, 1000-79-7-43.2, 1.08 acre, unimproved, sold on 6/28/07 for $ 400,000_ The current value of a buildable one acre is home site is approximately $ 350,000. to $ 400,000. The average prices per square foot of each of the sales is $ 8.5. The town of Southold has a development rights program and normally considered the development rights to be worth approximately 75% of the total value with the remaining 25% considered as not buildable except for agricultural purposes. The subject would indicate a price per square foot of$ 2. ( $ 8.5 x 25 0 = $ 2.1.3 round off to $ 2.) $ 2_ x 42,545 sq.' = $ 85,090. Subject value. The sales indicated a range of$ 75,000. and the price per square foot indicated a value of$ 85,000. The value indicated for the subject is $ 80,000. 38 39 FEE toDv rk" Pond Pf ZI 1V� D ,\,� Ci• - 10 SIIa T0. ON \\ \� N 1193 w\ H p EAST\ TTITUCK No 0 LON SLA a C U C HLLJ w•. � \ �S!,5. 'fir box a). COW. EL 25 exe"'-ye o'o •.?� l +c, � 6`1 .a>n•. L'� r,+ I 1 9 .'y :._- :..car ae`\ --_-__ �'��V,m"; ."'�,•--,' � f. 4F r , / tf r F • Cf r• Cx _ 47 � ( • _ ' - -' - F,A'17E�bFI I- I a000� . .� � � tt � __ J �:o rp� .YC. ;•. rt NEW SUFFOLK K I� 4 + , + Ilk 41 e• :� P• u O '�•" AltL V � r � s s F` t HD , \� t� �'` � _� J \ ,�-{`JP`• ^�\i/��`fir r \ to ?qor IAIR, NOW/FQii(ERLY OF �\ K :iAvilNCiilpC � �/d( lD �:C/t• LU . . S 51013'55" E SE,°/yO:LIIIE�TYPi — — N7Q' _ 1�oI G. y�° Rtr3�. .• ttL�77 a 1R7�d r j via �Cg` rWP �v°v mRM23 Lo , l 1 I r+oo rRCP AM � . t "op •° / .. C W I * I rrL.v Ile Fi1;�RM ien 19 m RM POND ° 1 � I ton 4 y ° A I/ \ 4a a N 1w FUA1tv1. \ `� ,s= RLERLY OF \ t I } d .tib 2° U. 6EEBE • I F.,11FANEY 3056'35" E �� , Q t 1� E '_21.47' O U o rimRM 35pnop — to c � 1 A RL4 im 7 .. .. . .. r '* "=' (a2) �T_r��heslcrfield �... n'ocld'at>d '( ..:` •154X, .r orb l-Y6 ` f �l as; .. Cil 'Ile Wille .. Deep - 0 �y bu i yE 145 y 17 77 T9, �,r s1 l N.1 Goldc-ml fur \ r _ •1• ;: _ l / ��,`r� No�Ai�Als�n ^t' l:WJotf�op 1ss _� sn alai I/ 2z _vii }� . _-._. (� = F �(11 nlfi Inn Ivo . B0 1 -,�-' v' \�i„t.d",Y� (I �`—S3u o P•Ilnt"R 1 \ Pond Md`adrn4 Nlana' �Goxajf _ N6tli�ran{Qrd Nut Plain \ `\ 1A5 e Wes • 1 `•� I e . 158/ ''WK`•n ^afK• � ' jos 1 1 `� '� } � "�,4, South�Lyrne ,a.;�'• .-} r°. yr , v;A• fj ke( �5e1}A.nsfaJ1% GiantsN}14' t" ' , m 'fie*•-4 mrarrf4rd 1-1 ,'^�_Ma8 , ,Guive�- P Y -d2lver •Cll IJCf� �+' .s_e a.•o '' "- I $lt}h ,red ro'•, Sak- �. Ir1d} T\,�- 1 •t''i'. D `"�' 14e ry + 'an��' , Jai tIP'�;.g-1. ' :A.JM.,'•� ���_ � ! -�y-[:"liA,,.�:4,�C `Y�Gl[j �p�Y' �`�{��'Fi MWIN _ _ £ ? �1� � ]�[�'i7 `�1: 3�y^•5'Tti �'�4+91'. 4�•"y W 1n mvq�r c rColdryr.,a._ 9Ei n. Aatd 4e , Y,Jt ie'in=sem i 9.8fa i !ndlr�: �•aP66 .d}- • .. F •oR � Y'pot . Hol ound Ave r F -` ' Nerd;cray�;`An- ' - " ' uet �s k' T 24a � sa 105 h 9�a"u 5cutllehols"mhlo+Sj 77 Nl 1.1i.,1, "g. H �"age —Flan_d�F.�,r'.n -4:�-.�. � >,t i--�—�%:•ofi��"`�,��oxi:„.`�1,�=�;��r � ..i._,. 'Fu'`ft �rOtl7f`::' .k.:•;fe�v.•'"+ 3,s15''�:r'r"� ' f ir!fi1+�r1Y '.h } � I'4�_ `\R..1 �--Yr�r": � ,-VISi4f ,�. :••i`y 05F eRUM f' i �f.< ,�.4s �''h rF' G PT1 ✓lr T�'i s' 7 N 0 rnl G 10 15 Streets98 cn,,,4,hl R iBft9-t Al ,micron CarFr Ion vWw IU wpPlyln.M r;,10 maned, Pin." 1118 eA hllr;,//�nY e�er118.mm. PnBn 1 n - e .q {.� '::rA::•rv�,1t;•`. •':1: •r'if�'n•`.'n'1'I'Y: .. 1.4 . . .r... ..f.•.(:.','�m . ,,. ..,; •.: 5. . `'errs:. , •.�•�—v"„1S, �i:��...::t:l.., x 5 t T 1 .(� .f ;('s..r�.. Yrq.:bird.:��: tt p..l r r. �": C ''! ' it 1 °• , s'y •ti 11 .A r . . } b A ( F' es (`' v ```� _t h � J >r r '< i'.'.,.Ir•.:. Ti.'i:'i .,•'�r41r:.r-) �: ;fir:. :a a yy r.•': .., "a;� .Y •'V u' '�-fr�''•r 'V '�"l is°y'i.d ifily ,l r '•� � w�191f 5� 1 f - �4 'rl rl r �:r'�i/�•.•; � 7r.` 1: r. . �•f.l • Imo.:' rr li''i ,'"r•' •�r(�• • S Ian :;gip^�n� y••r .• /q.�.i.:�l:��•?!.•' • ..P•/• ''l.. �.. . /.. J r (..� 1 11 • f i• •��"lir'•• . t' l J ! .L ! t • 1 • oa Mir r .1 I r... :W. ( • :�/r'ly[::J . , 1'..r'r .(Y Ire :.1/., , ••/ I, .,{,r .,y •r./,r(...yin ., •T'L [ ('• t�:.•; •I .. •.�. .4: •r �:.:as: 1' ✓,: :/!'•c ���1^4. r'J• •/' •;� 'rl �I�If'•�•'\i`,,•.r il•J• '.-.t... ..4•a. •'f ' /•.I, •''` - .'}lei: ••/1' :. • •moi" t• ' • • '^iK. Y4.`•• It.ln. •I,• I•„• � ••'r ni 6.rn:i�.rL•���•1•� r 1• yy � p'• •q� f r4���Yf�7 �,Vi.�l�s f � ' 1 e *al I •FT. ,. <- '1 elf t, f.: �• it �� J.�GI•ti:c..�<<.ell�bf. .. ... 'r• F9�' w�� l', ''f �i'Ila _ - d f r�,�,. • '�r•ta µ�yG,O"+"..,fj hv� ;u�y;�nn .� •�'• e"'.F �1•rcL,v 'ova sPti RM .K n ISM A : s:N °'�... 1.ri ' e THE SCOPE OF THE LIMrrED APPRAISAL This Limited Appralsnl And SummOry APpminal Raton Is based on am Inapoollon of the neighborhood,svb(ect prepody. And the analysis of Informngon gathered fain public or pdverta records that may have An Influnnce en the vslu9 of the to property. DEFRdrION OF MARKET VALUE: The most probable prion WNch n pmfwry should bring In a can"tnNn eM open Market ander all eandltlana mWinite to n fair snln,the buyer and nelier,ancll acting prudently,fmawlecignably and aso4 ing the pr eA in nal allotted by Unduo Stimulus. IMDilc t In We dafinlllon Is the oeneummPlion of A nate as 01 e ?peclflad date and the p?Ssing of talo Ilam sailer to buyer antler condition whamby:(1)bvyor and saner are yPicsry molNoted:(2)both pndles oro well Informed or well advised.and each noting In what no consldem him own ba-t Interest (3)a reoaonphle tiro,.it ollowed for axyosure In the open mnrY.et:(A)payment Is made In leans of oth In US dollars or In terms of financial avanp0mant3 comparable thomto;And IS)tho price mpresents the neural consideration for the property sold unetlectod by special or creative find. Ihg or notes ccncaa3loms granted by myons esaoa ed with the sale. STATEMENT OF LrWrrING CONDITIONS AND APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION CONTINGENT AND.LIMITING CONDITIONS:Thar appraiser's cer-Ricallon that Appears In live sppmrsel report Is autgocf to the following cendilloma: 1.The approlser will not be m9ponalble for matters of a legal mature that allarA tither the property being appminnd or the Lille to It,The eppralstr manVne3 that Ira titan In peed and msrkelnblq end,thnrefors,will net,onder arty opinlona about the titin.The property in wprelae.d on the basin of It baling under moponslblo Ownership. ?My sketch that may be Inoludcd In the aPPY31"I report to shave nppfo Irrptt dlmenalonn of tho IrnpMvermnn(and)the ekatch L Included only 10 astls+lho render In viouallzing the pmperty and understanding the eppmdcnr t datonImflcn of It_ Alza 3.Thn appealnnr has rrxavdnod tho avnllabls flood maps that am provided by tlw Fedsml Emergency Management Agency (or olhor date ammo.)And has noted N the MprNsN report whofher Lha mubject 9119 In located in an Iden9pnd Special Flood Hazard Ama. Th-appmh_er In not n duwayer.and he or she mape9 no Marantoes,mproeoed or ImWled,mgaminp this dotorminalion, A.The opprelaer will give no teebra.m'or appear in oourt because he or she moue An appraisal of the pmpary In question. wlk,3 apecllio aneng9marrto to do to have gam mode botorehoro. $.If the cost npprvach Is u1111zo.d.the value of the tend In aStlmet d at Ili_Interleaf or best u*n and the Improvementn at their contrloUtory values These mpemic veluallons of the lend AMI 6Apmvements must rot ba nand In coltinctlen With Any ® other approltal And are Irnrelld If Ihty oro no most 6: Unless OjhA.Iae noted In Ine ayrslsal mparL an Interior And correlate evterbr physical Inspnmlm of the "act property he-not 1:a.n compacted.Only abaonable Adverse condlllohs(such as neadod repsae,depreciation,the preserver, of hezAldous wo:lbs,lgalo srubs4.1nce9,afb J holed duringthn lnApoctfon of the atbjjncl propeth•.or that the appralsarbPn" Aware of during The normal maosech involved In pertorminq the limited apprahN am contained heroin,lNest otberwlae staled In tho epprtisal reparl the mrpleieor hien no k rowledga of Any hidden or rmoppamnt condlflom of the property w advema emvlronmontel conditions(Includingline presence of hizardom wanton.We suhniarres,ate.)that wol)fd make tl property nears or leen valuable,end no enei mad Out than,aro no wch cmghflomr and makoo me guamrheen or wairAnUes, c)praased or Implied, regaNhg the oondtlon of ihn propory. The Appraiser will not be responnibie for AT/ such condltlonn that do evlst or for arc'engineering or tasting that mlght be roqulred to dlDcover wh9thnr such condtions eyL^1. P916 se the epprel3Ar Is oat a1 azpert to the field of envtraranenhl hazard3,the eppralaal report mrr+l not as conaldared all an environmental m ee"mnrd of the property. T.The epprainnr obtained the information.estlmrdes,anti oofnkrvd that were mpmssed In tins opprniaol report from nourcen diet he or she consldera Ie be reliable and Wives them tO be torn And correct, The appratner does not sememo ronponsibNb for the accuracy of such Items that were famished by Other portion, S.The aoprelaor will hot dlttlo1a the eoMente a1 the appml3al report trcePt M prwlded far In the Uniform Si.•.0"'Je Cf Proreeslor']I Appmlaal Practice. 9. The Appraiser han basad IUs or mer--PprelaAI report and valua9an corwimlone for an appraiser that la subset to setia:aclery,completion mpalfs or alienation an the eaetlmptar,trial nompletlan of the Improvements will be pertomne.d In s workm- llkn mwmer. 10.The mpprelaef must provlde Ma aher prior written conaerd,before thn lenderyellnnt epoelfiad In the Morainal report can diairlixrle lila oDPfnlsAl report (Ineludng concluolon nbout the ompery vnlr»,the appronces Idomi(y And pro:aselanY doJmetlops,end roferenca3 to Any PmfnsalOnol auMalsst organization or the film Ip whlch gm npprolsor L-aesodaiod)In anyone Dither glen thn brrower. the morlgDgee or Ib succos3nm and Designs. tho mortgngn Inurco. cotsult:Tnk professional Aopr9fael orgmhtationz Army+late or the Dletrlct of Columbla:extopl that the lerdnr/client may dletd7ule the property concretion acctlon of the (Wreleal report Only to dela collection or reporting ser Ice(a)w11houl hawing to obtain iho appraiser's prior written consent The approlaerb written aonseM. and eppro" mu_t also ha oMairvid before Ilia appmleal report con be camveyed ly uryohe to the wbllo through aWeriin)ng.Publlc minllons,newn,hales.or Other modth. �i FHLMC Form 112?(10i911 Page 1 o',?. • F _ APPRAISER-CERTIFICATION: The APProfear and agrees rhvl: hwo rona,rchod the madret arca end hmo 0e16010d o minlmum of three mcenl sale,e1 pe,mitlon moat slmgJr and pmrMcto to the subject properly for consideration In the and,_comsnd9rm analysis and revs mode ortunfmentp where appropriate to mood the market ranctlon to fhooe Items of slgnlllcard variation It a significant Item In a companNe property Is sulledmr to,or more tow ablo 111M, the sutjnct property. I hale made a legative odlustment in reduce rho edjtnted wItua of the comperabin rad. It a signlUeoM Item In a comporable property la Intofior to. or lose fnuonble then the aubjert pmp,dy.I have more a ponitNo edJUstmont to increase the edNstod will or the compamble.Unlces moluded a.^.an addendUM�0 1nN epDfelsol rcpofl,Uta ed)ua}ment add Is relished In file wOgtflle Of the 5epn1nnr- 2.I have take Ince comldnregOn the footers that havo an Impact on volae In my development Of tilt;estimate of market value In the appraisal mpart. I have not knowingly Withhold any slgnllkent IOlofma Ion tom the nppmisal report.and I begin e, to Via best of my knowledge, that 611 nialermenL�and inlematlan In the appral9et report or^tare and correct 3. I stated in the sppralsel report only my awn psmonzl.unblased, end prPlssalnnal enaly tin.Opminns.and canclualonn. wills,aro nWJect only to{hem h± 121om,, A ,I hose no p -cant or proapoclNe lotomat In the property their Is the]ubject of this appraisal mport arld i have no present or prospadNe pononal Interest or Not,with respect to the participants ei file 1ren3ectkn.I did net boan.other pnrtlelty or completely. my annlyols end/or the osllmate of market voluo In the eppnbai report on if* me". color,religion sex heedless,inmlllai'innfs,or nallonal Origin of Plinio,the pmspacilvn ovmon or ocnlnarte of in,.subject property or 11 no present owners or eOtlfparag M the proportion in the vicinity o1 the subJnd pmt.nal. S.I hMn no pmt nt or oontemppted future reforest In the subject proparh/.and neither my currant or future girom nein not my<oamrrt--Boon for performing This Bpprafeef is centlognnt On the Bppfdand value of the pmpeltf. S. I was amt mqulmd t0 Period a prodelerminad value or affection In value that fmiara ma counO of rho olknit or In Bay minted party,the amount M theveiva iron dta,the alfglmmam of a spacillod result.orlhe occurrence of n sWsequantevent In order to lecithin rrry compensation and/or employment for performing the appraisal. I did net been iho approbirf report on a roque,led minlmlm vellnihm.a erectile valuation,or the nano to appmvo a specific morignan leen. T. I corlwmad Ills bppmisA In cerfomdly vArh the Unllorm ^utandanis d ProfaOalcne) Apnnlsai Pmcike that woe adopted and pmmulgoted by iho Appraisal Standards©o rd of the Apprlr.al PouMYlon and Ihal were in place as or the effective into of min appraisal report.I acknowledge that oil O?irmato of reasonabin time I.roxf,"ure In tho Open market It a condition In the derinhlou otmarket value and the e_tlmnin I do nioped 19 eanslstenl with the maYrettng 11". noted In fhn neighborhood,cellon of this solprelsal report.unlesa I hive othorwiles stm!nd In ao addendum to the eppraldal report, B.Tho ,,tent of the Inapactlon proc5ea(nxWor and/or Interior)with mei to the subject of thra oppmL-31 ropert is notes on page f of the report and/or In a sopenite addendum, Unless otherwise noted In the appmisa{report o:nn stlache0 ntldenduat,the appraiser has Inspected the Mrdmrlor of the propartee gated at com09rabl9e In this eppmisal mparL I have, c ,h, , aMervable,e Drnnt or knWvn odvnrse mtdlUone In me aW)oc!MFSwammN.,on the,ubject pito. ton mty f noted sial pP ow the lin man yal; the ihn subject property of which I ern aysre and Awr,made a unhnents for these advc;�: fn Y condNlona In till arslyals M the prcpeNy value to the rrXlar,1 tont 1 had matkrt avldnnco to srnport them. 1 ham,elan .lull Of nub ee m commented sbeul the effect M mo Btrielse conditions an Urn nl9fk519 ty h J- D portal. 9.1 pomonnlly prspemd alt conciuslor n and opinions about the real estate that were oct forth in the eppralrar report If t riled on fignificoat professional anni-lento from any infidel l(s)In tho Pertomv,nco of the oppmls—al Of thin preparptiw of the appraisal mport I h.Tve named such Indvidual(B)nrtd disclosed the SDeotflc task'pnrtornbed by them In an eftoNmd adds idurn to this apptslsel rapOrL I certify that any Individual yo named I--quallfled to perform the task-, 1 hwo net ,uthenzed mWene to make n chFNgn to wry Item In the appmlpel report, ingreforo,It any u,outhartied conrige Is mode tg the appmleai report I will take no reshonslblilti for It SUPERVISORY APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: I}a supemdaory npprelser signed the rpprnlsal roporf,he pr silo centra,and aprac-.that 1 dractly WVg,,L'o the apposite,who propamn the PppmNal report,nava r_dew•nr the appraL d report agree with the stniemenN and condualon9 of the appraiser,spree to bo bound by the appralasrm cenlfinUerts obwo. and am taking rulj m:penolblIliy for this apprafgal report. of I.ruo Cutohopuo Ictal 11939 (1000-102-1 9.1.) l�,rnttM P A niena:D^P Mtl d repFHy P_ — teaWred) Sign rift. _ _ �l 9lgnaium: Grate til __—____.__._.____...,- - Data Stale CcrUlkation;l:ii1`SG�. N d60000J.2B31 Stair:CertHlcetionH ._ ._ pr LlconerW. orl-licentaii Satt, 11c,. York Fyplrstlon bete n1 CcrtYknfien or ikons¢2/09_ __ E.xplmflon We of Certi9aatlon or Lfcnn9e- _ --- Subject _,Subject Inspection: Subject lnspoatioR Interior and 6inflor Qmlerinf end EYtorict r]Fxferlor Only Frtedor Only DOW Net Insert Property �• PNLNC Form 1129(10145) Page 2 of 2 • CHARLES R. CUDDY Attorney at Law 445 Griffing Avenue Riverhead,New York 11901 tcel No.: (631)369.8200 Fax No.: (631)369-9080 70: Irwin Eyerman 207-5974 TELECOPIER COVER SKEET Total Number of pages 1 including cover sheet. If transmission is faulty or incomplete, please inform us as soon as possible. Operator: Iwona Date: April 24, 2008 Comments: lie: Ctytehogue Parcel IJased'upon the information provided to one of the Southold Town Assessors, Kevin Webster, he estimated that the real property taxes would be between $350,000 and $400,000. • Charles R. Cuddy Tr faxjrtaassnlsslan togErher with ntatcriais f0tlowing are Intended for the parson or petsans named hereon and are cdtuidertd confidential infbt'tnation. Jfyou have received this tramsmtrslon in error,you are directed to return these Dia ttialt immediately by rdgular may to rhesender at the above address. Postage inryrredfor the return will be paid by this fisc ' F • CHARLES R.CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIPPING AVENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK [ailing Address:I TEL: (631)369-4200 O.Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080 iverhead,NY 11901 February 2, 2007 E-mail: charles.cuddy@verizon.net Mr.IrMn Eyerman The Hamlet at Cutchogue, LLC North Ocean Development 1721 -1D North Ocean Avenue Medford, NY 11763 Re: 4''1 Acre Hamlet Density Parcel - Cutchogue Dear Mr. Eyerman: •Enclosed please find a copy of the tax bill for the subject property. Very truly yours, C, ct.�Cw Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ik Enclosure • •SUP FOLK COONi IAA re,gf Uu rmrH ' SUN,COVE ',Ii+J ACCOUNT OUT,BEA I DILL UUTADER 1CRES E% SCRIPTIO•• PgOPEgrY.UCM1T10`l A.Is�a� I E%ErdPflpry r1PA01101 E%ESFTON PURPOSE COUr1iv AID TO[TI.NO HAUK LODE :. . FgOPEPTY f.Cpf gOLL S°Ci PIItIPFgiV T1TF \'/APiApT pFIELnr1O s'E-Sp:EOi iOTi.L ASEESSLtCIiT 1. 1. , F II 11 11 OTIMER/S Or TA%AOLC STATUS DATE ON rMAPCI.1.8006 1 2005-2006 TAX PnYf✓IE NT INFOI'll I 10N NOTICE OK ASSES EO VALUE • of 1Tti�#iLTL�tIMitLZIREMI {'kRBbTL''A uW � A� v z nrlF ue f A 6 1 � llW MIT .�w *��i��t � E t" w' "^Ip'�" Ln";y�* _o � . TAX LEVIED FOR SCHO L_ IN17."Il� �kk�a T"..7.6St Erni cC.q r. u� " TAX UVIEI1TTD FOR COUNTY 1 �'4�rii't. T Y rca_x Y . .,�r kl,aMl '� s:.3, i +Y`, , I+wo TAX LEVIED 411M FOR TOWN 1 ,u e 4 E P.A 1 1�r1' Yn 4 SWr A � 4""� rt fl 1 r f f d f l� MIW 4 q yld>�... `Ir. +t � 1'-T� .r 1�✓4t���.x,a v p•''� I �h y a �h1JG 6�'' wn. .,E' I d• .i a 9, T y 1 rf I. I F ff ! ( L px +2.1 J" 1 � i IT, 11. ' '...1-'r'I1 zww.A rRrjwY�+•1x�1fY.G r ITiN H -kr tii, yl M'•,I ,L! -t-Myi{+.Y'. J.7t tkFr{'i„ TAX LEVIED FOIF ImR OTHER DISTRICTS v1'^��r r-� �r�-,-°' yr Pt"a , 'rro .�t:lrl # _ .-.. -';.'�:"1°!•sl: _.1 `�1��� fi�.. '�iilil{.'.. .�c1.1:11„ .F$'fi,�i�,l�." .x r�ili�J'"t J ! �J' °'�1 �i�a .„•u I�F#r�4i•1 f t tl I i”llr T" f],'I 1 [ l �F,t 11 I(l l i� I `l1I I t3 1r iI lI ±1;{I.TIl1 1 71 r. !1111 AYI �I1•� i Itlll }' . f tl ITIi , �I7.1 �If f 11 I i II II 11 l i . 1111 t 1 ' !i Yl+PI 1 Ino, I�r!! i [t Y`llx ANtl hF1'jl 'Sftli L 1 fLli Ai II 1 � ;I �1 [ - � Ir PI Ij' 111 �r� 111�L{ NI 1 ap rlf-lr.1 I� ` 1�11 I 11 II Iri if}�'�• sEcm HALr t 8 AdE ARD n LIEU C L ]r rn+n91 f T Irl out r[r oLrr To Inv AI.)n0T Fr 01 I! 1 1•j rI�A I I 1 hl II T(' ; n Y? It li II 'f tR' 'aLi 1 .-T 11 1.—r t IIr II 11'. ia. ll. b! b oli pit. 4k• 777 kl t �' Jte�al!��slt�n�hY•s+_�d LI �1 't �11 rt.Il �Iy�ryYru-,.rnFf 11 M i t +.11 -^ cnai l •i 1Y w,v P V I a ♦ a7 � "� 14- Y Ig' � ap. �,Ml 'br'oi`1F'�i�”d^-J � � <W^•k„4i��Y_. v �.1, l Ir .• 1111 1 1 ..{.I . I4111111111 : 1 t �'JtlWR,��� � L [ -. [�5' .. 1 IAT �'''�"�. h' 1 +��'�,udk ill l ry '1 1� i•� �:,' a4 M 'iC;rl3tt i"� N•. ��{11fi1 ,1 - >,�a 1.� IN' . iiFnfiI t+ 1IFSI UILF illLS UECOIEn1IEU DEC r 20Tb PA1nq LE.:0HOu1 FuIN.IV ID.:Ru Y § i k. l �• I i.hr -., .�a,.r� r �. R 1• ht i ' 1111 1 1 . 1 .11 . ' 111111111 GPI Greenman - Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services December 3, 2007 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Information Services NY Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, Fifth Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 Re: Heritage at Cutchogue, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, NY GPI Project No. 2004334 Dear Sir or Madam:: I am writing to request information about the possible presence of a globally rare ecological community, or the presence of rare or endangered plant or animal species at the proposed Heritage at Cutchogue development site. The area is located at the northwest comet of Gtiffing Street and Schoolhouse Road in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY. Enclosed find a location map of the area with the project limits marked. I� The information is needed in ordet.to avoid or mitigate ecological impacts as much as possible. . . Thank you for your attention to this matter: Very truly yours, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Keith Holley Environmental Scientist J 325 West Main Street, Babylon, NY 11702 Tel: (631) 587-5060 Fax: (63 1) 422-3479- www.gpinet.com K LA J AJ as ,DD ORE.GON pE Lf. T 4 ed fiat sp 119 . . EGpN . ¢� 9 CUT�HOGUE 1 S A 84 " RD s EAST- TTITUCK cf'" LO" ISLp�D �� v ps J -P LY/TO/O6VE . AAmtF S.v 0. BPS �' as C A ILS. j N OP gE zs r w Eea ` ' y NEK,s b lEE1 h 6YLF0 q � E W NEgi Pv ' n 4 pt 'NOR .Po k Rp ox DP,a.m Ap . COUNTRY. W c s z MAM CK 0- MA .y G4. s7 E, true ¢s� Ct• � AIRPORT a„hE�< c �^ T� OVOKEOpy '10 .. 'I ARK PS' \ r a M row. s}Y... aYooka Pi OId Cote Ap yT KmoQat. '`„ pVBV`k.�Opr �'•." _. ` ' _ - fM , NEW SUFFOLK ='-:LL;: N0RT/t . �• B A Y � R.�- n _r. Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-4757 Clione: (518) 402-8935 • FAX: (518) 402-8925 vw.dec.state.ny.us Alexander B.Grannis Commissioner December 24,2007 Keith Holley Greenman Pedersen, Inc 325 West Main St Babylon, NY 11702 Dear Mr: Holley: In response to your recent request,we have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program database with respect to an Environmental Assessment for the proposed Heritage @ Cutchogue Development, #2004 334, site as indicated on the map you provided, located in the Town of Cutchogue, Suffolk County. Enclosed is a report of rare or state-listed animals and plants, significant natural communities, and other significant habitats, which our databases indicate occur, or may occur, on your site or in the immediate vicinity of your site. The infarmation contained. in this report.is considered sensitive and should not be released to the public without permission from the New York Natural Heritage Program. `•� The presence of the plants and animals identified in the enclosed report may result in this project requiring additional review or permit conditions. For further guidance, and for information regarding other permits that may be required under state law for regulated areas or activities (e.g.,regulated wetlands), please contact the appropriate NYS DEC Regional Office, Division of Environmental Permits, at the enclosed address. For most sites, comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted•, the enclosed report only includes records from our databases. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species or significant natural communities. This information should not be substituted for on-site surveys that may be required for environment impact assessment. Our databases are continually growing as records are added and updated. If this proposed project is still under development one year from now, we recommend that you contact its again so that we may update this response with the most current information. QJL o✓ �2_" Tara Seoane, Information Services Encs. New York Natural Heritage Program __ _ cc: Reg, I, Wildlife.Mgr. . Natural Heritage Report on Rare Species and Ecological Communities .. NY Natural Heritage Program,NYS DEC,625 Broadway,5th Floor, ' \ Albany, NY 12233-4757 (518)402-8935 AORICAL RECORDS Fhe following plants and animals were documented in the vicinity of the project site at one time, but have not been documented here since 1979 or earlier. Fhere is no recent information on these.plants and animals in the vicinity of the project site and their current status there is unknown. In most cases the precise location of the plant or animal in this vicinity at the time it was last documented is also unknown and therefore location maps are generally not provided. f appropriate habitat for these plants or animals is present in the vicinity of the project site, it is possible that they may still occur . here. Natural Heritage Report on Rare Species and Ecological Communities RAGONFLIES and DAMSELFLIES Nehalennia integricollis Office Use Southern Sprite NY Legal Status: Special Concern NYS Rank: S1 -Critically imperiled 12596 Federal Listing: Global Rank: G5-Demonstrably secure Last Report 1953 or 1954? EO Rank: Historical, no recent County: New York State Waters,Suffolk information Town: Ny State Waters,Southold Location: Mattituck Directions: The damselflies were captured in Mattituck and Cutchogue on Long Island. From Riverhead take Route 48 northeast towards Southold. Mattituck is not far across the town boundary into Southhold from Riverhead.From Mattituck,follow Route 25 for approximately 2 mi northeast to Cutchogue' General Quality The damselfly was captured in the vicinity of two different towns on a very large island. and Habitat: ASCULAR PLANTS Helianthemum dumosum —• Office Use Bushy Rockrose. .NY Legal Status: Threatened, NYS Rank:.. . S2- Imperiled 9251 Federal Listing: Global Rank: G3-Vulnerable Last Report: . 1921-09-09 EO Rank: Failed to find but search more County: Suffolk M Town: Southold Location: Cutchogue Directions: Cutchogue. General Quality and Habitat: December 20,2007 -_ Pagel pt.; Lespedeza stuevei Velvety NY legal Status: Threatened NYS Rank: S2-Imperiled Office Use 548 sh-clover Federal listing: Global Rank: G4?-Apparently secure Last Report: 1919-09-07 EO Rank: Historical, no recent information County: Suffolk. M Town: Southold Location: Cutchogue Directions: Cutchogue. General Quality Drywoods. and Habitat: Records Processed lore detailed information about many of the rare and listed animals and plants in New York, including biology,identification, habitat, onservation, and management, are available online in Natural Heritage's Conservation Guides at www.acris.nvnhp.org,from NatureServe xplorer at hftp:/Aww.natUreserve.org/exrlore ,from NYSDEC at http:/Aw.vw.dec.ny.dov/ar.imaist7494.html(for animals),and from USDA's (ants Database at http://plants.usda.govrindex.html(for plants). December 20,2007 . Page 2 of; NELSON & _ POPE ENGINEERS 6 SURVEYORS VICTOR BERT.RE• JOSEPH R.EPIFANIA,RE• ROBERT G.NELSON JR.,P.E. PAUL M.RAG Z,RLS.•THOMAS F.LEMBO.PE•GARY S.BECKER,PE- - GREGORY D.PETERMAN,RLS.•ERIC.J.MCFERAAN,P.E•THOMAS C.DI%ON.P.E. April30;2008 Ms. Jeri Woodhouse Chairperson; Planning Board - Town of Southold 53095 Route 25. Southold; NY 11971 Re: The Heritage at Cutchogue Planning Board Comments Nelson &Pope No.'00026 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: The 16 specific;Planning Board concerns identified in the Final Scope were addressed in our revised.Traffic.Impact Study dated November 2007. The following:identifies the location of t1agresponses in the updated Traffic l'mpact.Study. Response to Item#1: Found on Page 20 of the Traffic Impact Study. Response to Item#2.: 'Found on Pages 33 and 35 o£the Traffic Impact Study. Response to Item43: Found on Pages 7 and 8 and Appendix.of the Traffic Impact:Study. Response to Item#4: Found on Pages 7 and 8 of the Traffic Iiripacf Study- Resp qnse tudy:Response to Item#l5: The.seasonal. adjustment factors were. updated with the .2007 NYSDQTadiustment factors. The updated factors can.befound on Fage % of the Traffic Impact Study Response to Xtejkn#6: A comparison of the most recent accident data{July 2Q04 tUrough . " June 2007)analyzed in the updated Traffic Impact study and the accidentafa(June 1999 through Inlay 2002) analyzed:in the original TrafficImpact Study reveals that, tfie.total number'accidents in the study area have reduced significantly.(a 66%D reduction) over the ` three years;period atid:the new data shows only i rear end accident over a period of three {3) years. It'should be noted that the study area is not a high accident loeatioasince only 18 accidents occurred in the study area comprising.af several'int ersectiolis ;and roadway. segments over a period of three .years. Therefore. no accident countermeasures are required in the study area. Response to.Item#7c . Found on Page 33 of the Traffic.Im act Stud p _ Y . .. S72 NB_VLL.E.W 1TJ4J-2'188 . [9'Dg2-J�•FAX(SSV42l�._• pp� - Planning Board Re:The Heritage at Cutcbogue Apri130,2008 Page 2 of 3 Response to Item#8: Found on Page 35 of the Traffic Impact Study.. Response to Item#9: Found on Pages 19 and 20 of the Traffic Impact Study. Response to Ite3n#i0: Found on Page.24 of the Traffic impact Study. Response to Item#11: ITE data was not utilized in the updated Traffic impact-.Study, Data obtained from the Founders_Villageresidential development was used to determine . tripL generation rates for the proposed.re-sidential,devdopment: The volumes obtained from the . . highest weekday AM, PM and.Satprday rates were utilized. . i Response to Item#12: Data obtained.at the.Founders Village development was used to model vehicle trips .and routing The updated trip generation and distribution can be found on pages 24, 25 and.26.ofthe Trafficlmpact Study. Response to Item013; Found on Page.35 of ilie Traffic Impact Study. Response to ,1tem#14: Analyses were conducted at the : additional `intersections requested by the Planning Board. The.updated results are found on Pages.16;,17;,18,34 and 35. Response to Item # 15. (A) The Spur Road emergency.access scenario whll effectively. limit.the access to.emergency:vehieles only. Therefore the intersection of Gnf5n Street and Schoolhouse Road wouldbecome the sole access to.the site... As shown in tfie:traffic study rt is estimated that 2ko of thetraffic generated by the proposed development would utilize the:Spur Road access. This 20% (9 trips) would then be reallocated to.the Griffin Stteet/lvlain Road intersection resulting in au-additional five southbound:right tium.and four;eastbound left tutu during each peak hour,�whiclr is not expeeted.to cause significant adverse'impact. (B):'The expected results of the two way traffic scenario on the; Spur Roadaccess'i5 demonstrated in the traffic impacts study as..not to .have significant adverse impacts. Thoixgh this;two-w,ay access:Would.'allow, traffic to "cut-through" the site fiom the . adjacent. nei hborhood :and . otenfiall .Sro $ . mthelvi . P.. y. _ _ ain.koad: on the .occasion; when ...downtownGutchogue experiences traffic_congestion this egmva]ent traffic yvouhd lie passing by- dowritown further reducmg traffic in the downtown area, It should.be noted.that . "cut-though" fraffic is likely to be.lierfcj'' by local traffic familiar with t7ie area. ;By- passing downtown traffic by Fvay of Highland Road, Spur Road, Sclw6lhouse.I2oad,_and Depot.Road is not'likelyto,be used by traffic not local.to.the area (C) The expected resialts,ofthe_one way exiting traffic scenario"on_the Spur Road aci cess - would effectively. increase the eastbound left toms at the. :'Griffin Street/1vLain.Road intersection by 3-4_vehicles per peak hour, which is not expected to cause-any adverse impacts This would.also remove the ability:of eastbound local "cut through" traffic 00 from both the neighborhood and the Main Road via Highland Road.described previously. Planning Board Re:The Heritage at Cutchogue Apri130;2008 • Page 3 of 3 Response to Item##16: The applicant does not own the property to the cast; hence.it is not practical to provide access to Depot Lane through the property to the east. 'We trust that this supplemental information in addition to. the updated Traffic Impact Study dated November 2007 will assist with your review of the application.'Please. contact us if you have further questions. Sincerely, ELSON 6 POP Q.�_Q. a o. 1F, h . .Pecora, P, , PTOE Attachments cc: Charles Cuddy, Esq. Jeffrey Rimland, Rimland Equities Ia20001000261MFF1003-37-08 PlanningBoard Coments.d M ac - Plate l Site Plans for the Proposed Project Nelson & Pope, Last Revised 9/15/2008 • I V\F�' u�.w5 xELL W Z Z Z ZW W W © e O J J J J NOWE/5FORNERLY a Q Q No W Q FRANK MACHINWId< I C BmiHA xuuca:wsB 1901.44' (DEED) — — — — — — 1904.80' (ACTUAL) _ S38'30'50"E (DEED) — — __ '+ a 538'24'20"E (ACTUAL) —— — —_ — — i _ _ _ _ ) w GREAT PECONIC BAY_ _ _ _ _ _ - - - �tA •- COS` 'd€ — — — — — — — FILP �" ma° ° I• += FAQ ■m Mel■ MOW Z LZ,I stlwa ua TM A W L f Q Q La „ KEY MAP O c T .i J N 1b 1 a REA EIPY■ WLSTIA RL.Fza 'n+Tza "� ° +�' la — IT _ n '■ Iz N 1■ — ° ■ • is r1fO � SCALE T-OS MILE dL fNT°' a A a ■7 A N I■ ' Lwp I \ O xaLALNF]lY YF � p �1 ° azo a • ° a _.— a ° °vA°A i' � a -1 axwA W �e � x( a � �' -� � � ■yI■ �\ • Talw FA ax O W LW■[iA■.cvl T. N NGw G0 MERLYaw 10+11 �p \� o+°° I \\ / ° _� '� \\� A _' k` \ x'■O■i. S37'04'4Tm ' = 1 � mo, � man a _ \ � r Vfi' " ® ®FILE Q \ � mNL■ m v N J \ IT'In�r A / W J ✓ O'� a'Yb ° � Nvf°a � n 10 O N r ( a � " ° �� r / my / n■■P R.s. � I sNN �AlO1' yS:v vwe � � IL zv a \� ® _ � 4aI \ �AOW / a \ � a ■a■ S37'04'40'E a+>; ° I I � �� �° n■ n , n 1, / m■F � lac _ >� Rs �■ „ � I -�}p '�"'. � z■• 4 z,zo�• 95.00' N GRIPPING STREET \ SPA IFS WiP' m� ■ mroT. S Win. p POND ■ ■ 11° 11 _ ' • �°F8 °B,a M+T1J alga , N N cp O' OI +°a'a °"�rvmd' A¶O1 _ 1 rwr dw a dwa° / E wmi riu. ° I \\✓✓// + N � � 1 4A � zLa NuuA■ �.° mon. « ' � ( ( sAw NOW/FORNDiLY m ? 1 a1• tl Y 'I'�MMmAM'a' E■�a 1Y m D VI En X1WAN N. BEE6E i WUDAN F. HEANEY yS m " ■° yg a IWI■ E em °I"1C F, aW POND .v O rrtd 1!!. ANy TWARR P mN m O . _ ' •L b 4 raixrwl ..._ qb 537'13'30"E (DEED) r' " ' t� ® n Q ° ILL '+AP mo xow/FONNLTD. aF o ■ FAIF I N3 `I3' " 30W `-' AMLTo. AL 221.4\7 400.00' r € �' \ °4`4�' / ■NW \ 'Q}' TNA' / g1 DW/FOINBaYOF ADA M 0 -.0 F CHUROH OF Ob C11 N7 I PInSACRED HEART 1�310 iFWL■ /� ` / ® IWDA J8m \ M fx,' °P■°� i� I-: F N � I x+ � —— I \ a / 4 m mn In.s'a .■•� \ 8e, \ / —— _ t � � i ej ,@'�e ay' Z I � / 2!m � � \\/ las `P v/ i 'I a A 1°IA \ a• �-,. _ � I • / m �® '$ 11¢ ++Lv.z mya■ PLiNF \ , x'dD as an ' . 6 {Nn■TJ JL 0 � a LONCNO D�w1�EYARD5 IN 3 n " o " al �O u \\ • / I \\ � '�/� °° A a \ ' /`\ \\ '" 'a � ! TIO - \ .�mR \ �■I,ab_ Hc° / / A ■' Im m.nA 1p _ � ' \\ 10 I I ■6° \ Y / aT W \ W—A / a s EInSa �" OT A \ TS N 0 I •■ N� a• ,�'W Ll ® O Y.- I'�kM \ — — a, a RS I A" '" yT4 I I rtm A EI O 1°S' rp�f A ® ® L NWIA !R1 Olt I M a■ F^2 ° PAaP O" V0 /Anr A_ro Ura \ — — � SIGN LEGEND (+1 O I f IVES ifk1T-0 ILS ILS RL./) M,T■■—— ——— — — —— — — — — —— — —— — —— PRLP. � � �� IN.sla DY ° m.na �.na CODE SYMBOL L - -- --- -- _--- Ise uJn[1m1_---- - _ — _ --- -- -- -- -- -- — 'q� DIIAW SAre T- - v�p��Apl�.�y -- Ali T� T - -- oueccs no. - R. II{ IQ NJ II wYII RI—IC 7A 06-54 20"W (� I I 2009.51' (DEED) a * 3 NOW/FORMERLY OF BAk NOw/FORNQiLr of 2009.22' (ACTUAL) AIDC i MISS S, 6 CO, NOW/idiMEM aF —� NOW/FdTNERLY OF NOW/FOmAERIY OF NOW/FORNERLY 6 PAUL M. k ORNCETG NOW/i0RMEALY OFTA9UWEWIC2, OAND A NOW/FORIIERLY OF IOROB(Y, pENBR051(Y. I HENRYHEi DEBORAH I NOW/FORMERLY OF HIGHLAND ROAD T. J I dNNEY, I 9TANIE7' UL I STANLEY R. WARRrEW, ' TI R7-6 Q YONPoNO RT. I Z I k GONNA W FRANCIS d JOAN k ISABEL ® L i MARIE C, W ml PARKING CALCULATIONS: ZONING DATA: REQUIRED' SITE COVERAGE:_ METES AND OBTAINED FROM SURVEY PLANS BY PECONIC SURVEYORS, SITE DATA: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING: 2 SPACES PER DWEI JNG PONDS 200,383 SF = 10.00% PC DATED APRIL 18. 2007SCTM: 1000-102-01-33.3 111 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNIT9. - 222 SPACES LANDSCAPING 1,038,905 SF - 51.86 ZONING: HAMLET DENSITY (HD)* SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING:, 2 SPACES PER DWEL INS ROAD, PARKING, AND PAVEMENT 267,877 SF = 13.37% ZONED: HAMLET DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR 1 FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS: 14 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNIT = 28 SPACES SIDEWALK, PATIO, AND GAZEBO 57,249 SF = 2.86% AFFORDABLE UNITS: 1.5 SPACES PER UNIT BUILDING 355,985 SF = 17.77% SITE AREA: 2.003.311.33SF = 45.9897 ACRES 14 UNITS x 1.5 SPACES/ UNRS 21 DRIVEWAY 82,912 SF = 4,14$ REQUIRED:. � ( TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED FOR UNITS - 271 SPACES 100.00% NUMBER OF UNITS = 139 LOT SIZE (S0. FT.) 10,000 2,003,311.33 SF = 45.9897 AC) NUMBER OF BUILDINGS = 131 (INCLUDING COMMUNITY CENTER AND MAINTANANCE GARAGE) LOT WIDTH (FEET) 60 216ZI COMMUNITY CENTER: UNIT TYPES LOT DEPTH (FEET) 80 2205.29 1 SPACE PER 300 SF OF RECREATIONAL FACILITY FRONT YARD (FEET) 30 212.07 5 SPACES PER TENNIS COURT a zAWzaG■ I�Y➢1EDAB FeI DRAtreG COLF�lIB 8Ji AFFORDABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT I{ 9 SIDE YARD (FEET) 15 35.0 COMMUNITY CENTER GFA = 14,400 SF / 300 = 48 SPAC S c GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ZONE IV (600 GAL/ACRE) BOTH SIDE YARDS (FEET) 30 70.0 POOL 1.160 SF / 300 - 4 SPAC s 712Vu■ REM®ALrgI REUEwoFRe�puFFEeOA'IEo•LErE,2aae exLEara FBB C D E ALLOWABLE SANITARY SITE FLOW: 2,003.311.33 SF/ 20.000 SF/ UNIT = 100 UNITS REAR YARD (FEET) 30 35.0 TENNIS COURT 1 COURT X 5/CT 100 X 75% = 75 UNITS 75 UNITS X 300 GPD/UNIT = 22,500 GPD UNABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ.FT./UNIT) 850 LIVABLE FLOOR AREA (SO.FT./UNIT) TOTAL REDUIRED PARKING: = 57 SPAC • 5/mlm FLYIIFOF011Eo 8kT REL c UNIT A 850 2604 a m/22lmOWBH011■EAe PEII C181F BJ1 UNIT B 850 1930 LOADING ZONE: UNIT C 850 2717 COMMUNITY CENTER WITH FLOOR AREA OF 5.000 TO 25.00 SF 2 W2Vm REw®Ae Fe+Bcn++saaien° LW1REs a UNIT D 850 2725 - 1 BERTH 1 IHp■/O■ Itlgemurourralcls+r MASS UNIT E 850 3110 AFFORDABLE UNIT 25% 1135 PROVIDED: 011124105eV�+�T00F801^I101D e11 LOT COVERAGE (%) 35 20.23% N° DATE PENNON BUILDING HEIGHT (FEEF) 2 1/2 SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING: 2 SPACES PER DWEI JNG IN GARAGE GRAPHIC SCALE NUMBER OF STORIES SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 111 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNITS = 222 SPACES SITE PLAN — AUGNMENT OWN.BY; �' SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING: 2 SPACES PER DWEL JNG Fdq DSGN BY. sm d loo o so IDz zaD OD NOTE: PROPOSED 55 AND OVER ADULT COMMUNITY WITH PUBLIC WATER 14 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNI = 28 SPACES AVAILABLE FROM SCWA. OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES FOR UNITS = 22 SPACES THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE fro/05 c • AS PER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD'S OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY'S LETTER TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED FOR UNITS = 272 SPACES EdTAv®As Ej c DATED MARCH 29. 2007, A SEWER SYSTEM IS NOT REQUIRED TO MELT CUTCHOGUE cwcD�• s�R '= W FEET THE ZONING CODE FOR 10,000 SF LOT SIZE COMMUNITY CENTER: DATE 1(V/O5 ( ) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED IN PARKING LOT 57 SPACES I CLUDING 3 HANDICAP SPACES OWNER: APPLICANT: NOTE' LOADING ZONE PROVIDED: 1 BERTH � TOWN OF E°OI.I"I1tiOL0. SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK - OISTgICT 1000, SECTION 102. BLOCK Ol. LOT 3LAA ' ' 0002 '. ILE THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE NELSON SL. POPE ` "'• PROPERTY OF NELSON k POPE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR NOCRO, LTD. THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE, LLC cADls O0o268P ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION 140 EAST MAIN ST. 1721—D NORTH OCEAN AVENUE ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 MEDFORD, NY 11763 - 94 -5665WALT It(MA31)427 20 mumILLE eWPOMY zlea SHAD' *F27 WILL BE PROSECUTED. (639 427-5665 FAX(6311427-56?A wwWneNonp°Peeom SFIff'R 20F 27 W W W W _ Z Z Z ZJ `^ J J J J ® 04 I • O N0WjY7FMSWY OF �- D ` ESTATE 6 Q Q NOW/FORMERLY OF Q Q 1 \ • I�� FRANK MACHWCHICK I c ADVA NUROTEMSxI cc 01.44' (DE ) g \ S38'30'50"E (DEED) L - _ >- f 190 .80 (ACL 4L) 19 S38.24'20"E (ACTUAL) �- r Z 'K � ' � Wl ate. (•W '"' (sFJ FAa .\ �. __ - �\_ ` / i �a. \ �� \ °'�' •6 R¢. Y A6 ° RAaw "t rA2A lea rll.'1•° iY m.aE.o / O A T z4 'n y Tri A, . .. WE L LOCAT10 AS PER c ta-INp, ,SES. AE4 alA•• irWrs iYWlk a '@ �S e� °PRa R�Ea �° RRPr•6a Ifi E 14 u in �.0 A m,..lae ° ° N. �z°C) �Z . GREAT PECONIC BAY r N/32 RESOURCES, VERIFY IN F1 Z j 1 SCALE,T-I' rvWl- a oa a az 1 r 4,, a• er J ', "'- C -=L - / I,ry[ a 22 e ( 110X O awAd 11 wcW r a \ SCAL -Ob MILE too A•AxXE U, `Jp\ • ' \ �`t`` -w} �� ® D A 30 1 n ^ ' __ NOW/FORIIEAIIOF' Rx.1rA tt , , a e A nw• Q \ 7 roWN W SWIXOID 1 a wE.a r � y A ua (alI Ria Ra) 14 " (� A IF4 '• T llWr iF1�° � 3 � '1• � •0 2a� • a YNNIFMNI2 v'p ,_I'UJ\�� 1 �ze�zed Rr5 • 2aa .IQ')` C • ri1n7're �- 4 eNADE J / ��y� \ � I X31 O ° til AES 4 � • � 2g 1 IMa • R.,, I!R __ � � T A fiL aAe � (�� l7 4 ry1 w 'k o • tJ� \ � 11 IFS Aft A / � � -� i E A _ � 0 tSyII l=` 11 � \ \ >2 � E � 115 E � \ mwaEe M1e � r 116 � •"_' �_ � \ 2 RI ^ �V\ o � ` -� • IE3 tRVW A � ° u �� ` � �°/al, IFL 4'. o IMw.• (•rD a a � i+�'' Iw to POND ° • „ 1• In ® L r'rr 1 °Was I""1p'tes'". u ° ,p' GRIFFING STR °^ oRWIsm Fa (�) •0 J N �` rw �, !gp rsa c Fa lea rfL.SIA x y N N /' / NOW/yaRMEALY OF A , �' •G / a1A 5Te11r WA em^e RWAa w .X .. • gssz"'a , \ \ W1WAx M. BEEBE WLU M F. HEANEY Y Ot y ew z4.o 0O :wnGr uulwx s r F D l \ rWF O lw�e0 ��. gym. a ry ob]ii1C WA1a1 y1.y P 0 N D \ \�• N\ \ /- T t� •w x..v 4;s • fFVW J ,may, a °"°^° awE �3 vuml aanAll�O . / ^9 v.n / t.� .�.� � zr� � � 37'13'9"E ?DEED) 221.47' OZAb I1e0�� IW • • rllew ` • \y' a.o •� \ Cj NOw/FOq]i2RLY a�F E �� A :a ° AM"A a �l n / N3TI3'30"W 11 409.00' h �ze�. ARro Lro. � � I 1 O nfjY w Ira ® 'gyp O °1 q,'1nM riI n� NOWWFORMERLr aF A ® c a '� ¢ n O µ A°°' E •�" SAS pm XEARrC / 1 '8 O Lia% 1•• L nI I I l \ Z \ P. a • • v • IeE m srs 'Q4 os (44J ' ° b0 +S• n °4t V 1011610SIAN00WL& WC. A6 �\ IFS Rt.11k RL Ye r rRa c z• raS. ' RES. A 41 ab (via N • �-lw+ �L 1 n A L 3 g 12 e• a Fp. '' M M 1- A er NOR. R ye WW)J a° A N -3a� O L' s•" a e, ), 'x' °° m.n g V A 1f 1q- a ® 1'r2• •a w c rlWw Y2 Y, O �W m e a ACMtl'i.0 9 '7' .,y Rwra p Wo rnA Frwzo Ise \ i ' -az, �dC �' $ \ r1L Tra tfl�•° (i1 �A IMX• / FW rgr leg J eWME tA• laJ rwnsal • / \ -ao' RR. ry I I I Ip xow/FaRuv(LY of 2009.51' (DEED) ,my NOW/FORMERLY \\�B\\ \ N1Igr MME Y OF ` O O I ALOo k "ISE xaw/FaRMERLrO 20 .22' (ACTU / NOWORMERLY OF NOW/FORMQiLY OF L ��Y• NOW XICHUND ROAD CORP. \s k O w NA M. NOW DI��L� ,R DEMBROSKY, `I+ PAUL M. k CONfERA /FORMERLY OF w k YOHPoNO RL 2 STASIUNEWCZ, J \ I e NAME C. I 150' SANITARY RADIUS I WATER PWELL� I HENRY k oETrDR,w I I IwARRm,,. NOW/FORMERLY OF WELL FROM CENTER OF (TYPICAL FOR 11) 401N k ISALU Fr I \ (TYPICLLI AL FOR 11) V) DRAINAGE AREA RUNOFF CALCULATIONS REQUIRED DRAINAGE RUNOFF CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN LEACHING POOLS DRAINAGE RUNOFF CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN POND DA 1 27,200.09 SF DA 10 98,573.98 SF DA 18 135.462.14 SF DA 1 12,947.16 SF x 0.5' = 6,473.58 CF STORAGE REQUIRED CONTRIBUTING TO POND: 1A, 5-10, 11A, 11B, 12-14, 16-22 AND 24-25 Pervious 20,361.33 SFx 0.3 = 6,108.40 SF Pervious 44,795.61 SFx 0.3 - 13,438.68 SF Pervious 61,672.24 SFx 0.3 = 18,501.67 SF 6,473.58 CF / 100.88 SF/VF = 64.17 VF Impervious 6,838.76 SFx 1.0 = 6,838.76 SFImpervious 27,317.91 SF x 1.0 = 27,317.91 SF Impervious 63,212.81 SF x 1.0 = 63,21281 SF 5 x 100.88 x14' ED = 7,061.60 CF PROVIDED TOTAL RUNOFF REQUIRED = 1,099,924.80 SF Total Runoff Area = 12,947.16 SF Pond 25,280.68 SFx 1.0 = 25,280.68 SF Gravel 10,577.09 SFx 0.7 - 7,403.96 SF USE: (5) 12'0 X 14' ED POOLS OR 70 V.F. DA 1A 17,392.90 SF Gazebo 1,179.78 SF x 1.0 - 1,179.78 SF Total Runoff Area 89,118.45 SF POND AREA = 164,296.84 SF x 4 FT = 657,187.36 CF OF STORAGE PROVIDED Total Runoff Area 67,217.05 SF DA 2 21,657.44 SF x 0.5' - 10,828.72 CF STORAGE REQUIRED Pervious 11,959.65 SFx 0.3 = 3,537.90 SF DA 19 Pervious .44 SF / /VF = 107.34 VF 1,099,924.80 CF/ 657,187.36 SF - 1.67' OF RAINFALL OR 20" OF RAIN DA 11 95,341.57 SF 10,828.72 CF 100.8 SF Impervious ff Ar 25 SFx 1.0 = 5,433.25 SF Pervious 46,201.87 SFx 0.3 = 13,860.56 SF Pervious 17,248.45 SFx 0.3 = 5,174.54 SF 7 x 100.88 x14' ED = 11,298.56 CF PROVIDED Total Runoff Area 9,021.15 SF Impervious 24,416.52 SFx 1.0 = 24,416.52 SF _ Impervious 22,104.74 SF x 1.0 - 1.253..74 SF Grovel 7,136.47 SF x 0.7 = 4,995,53 SF USE (7) 12'0 X 18' ED POOLS OR 112 V.F. DA 2 Pervious .43 SF Off-Tote ff Area SFx 0.3 = 1,253.48 SF Total Runoff Area 34,586.58 SF PeMous 35,60284 SFx 0.3 = 10,680.35 SF Totdl Runoff Area = 37,218.78 SF __ DA 3 11,447.94 SF x 0.5' = 5,723.97 CF STORAGE REQUIRED Impervious 10,976.59 SFx 1.0 = 10,978.59 SF DA 20 48,278.06 SF 5,723.97 CF / 100.88 SF/VF = 16.74 VF Total Runoff Area 21,657.44 SF DA 11A 51.007.47 SF Pervious 23,093.77 SFx 0.3 = 6,928.13 SF 5 x 100.88 x 14' ED - 7,061.60 CF PROVIDED TOTAL SITE DRAINAGE Pervious 16,304.41 SF x 0.3 - 4,891.32 SF Impervious 22,407.62 SFx 1.0 = 22,407.62 SF USE (5) 12'0 X W ED POOLS OR 70 V.F. DA 3 24,050.47 SF Impervious 21,463.88 SFx 1.0 = 21,463.88 SF Gravel 2,776.67 SFx 0.7 = 1,943.67 SF Off-Site 13,239.18 SF x 0.3 = 3,971.75 SF Total Runoff Area = 31,279,42 SF DA 4 11.7 2.30 F z 100 8 11,87230 CF STORAGE REQUIRED Pervious 13,003.62 SFx 0.3 = 5,401.09 SF _ TOTAL SITE RUNOFF REQUIRED = 1,308,.55M05 SFx 0.5 FT OF RAIN FALL = 854,277.03 CF Impervious 6,046.85 SFx 1.0 = 6,046.85 SF Total Runoff Area - 30,326.95 SF 11,x 100. CF / ' ED SF/VF12,10 = 117.69 VF Total Runoff Area 11,447.94 SF DA 21 Pervious 6.58 SF 8 x 100.88 x 15' ED D POOLS CF PROVIDED TOTAL SITE STORAGE PROVIDED = 742,935.36 CF DA 178 19,716.21 SF Pervious 43,024.00 SFx 0.3 = 12,907.20 SF USE: (8) 12'0 % 15' ED POOLS OR 120 V.F. DA 4 54,832.46 Pervious 4,486.41 SF x 0.3 - 1,345.92 SF Impervious 50,257.92 SFx 1.0 = 50,257.92 SF Impervious 18,370.29 SF x 1.0 = 18,370.29 SF Gravel 13,613.66 SF x 0.7 - 9,529.56 SF DA 11 37,218.78 SF x 0.5' = 18,609.39 CF STORAGE REQUIRED Pervious 44,427.24 SFx 0.3 = 13,323.37 SF Total Runoff Area = 19,716.21 SF Total Runoff Area = 72,694.68 SF 18.609.39 OF 100.8 SF Impervious off Amu SFz 1.0 = 10,74.4.5 SF 12 x 100.88 x 15' ED - 1�8.408CF PROVIDED 4.47 VF Total Runoff Aro° = 23,744.58 5F DA 22 43,827.03 SF USE (12) 12'0 X 15' ED POOLS DA 5 154,093.95 SF DA 12 361,466.46 SF Pervious 27,856.31 SFx 0.3 = 8,356.89 SF + i ADDITIONAL 12'0 x 8' ED Pervious 63,157.19 SFx 0.3 = 18,947.16 SF Pervious 146,285.38 SFx 0.3 - 43,885.61 SF Impervious 4,38,66 SFx 1.0 = 4,38.66 SF TOTAL CF OF STORAGE PROVIDED = 18,965.44 CF OR 188 V.F. 29(..11 SF Impervious 56,660.82 SFx 1.0 = 56,660.82 SF Pond 11,58.06 SF x 1.0 = 11,585.06 SF Impervious 75,290.11 SFx 1.0 = 75, Gravel 15,64685 SFx 07 = 10952.66 SF Pond 158,520.26 SFx 1.0 - 158,520.26 SF Total Runoff Area - 24,327.61 SF DA 15 20,464.35 SF x 0.5' = 10,23218 CF STORAGE REQUIRED AFFORDABLE . . , Total Runoff Area 259,086.69 SF 10,232.18 CF 100.88 = 101.43 VF Total Runoff Area = 105,189.92 SF / 13 12,972.74 SF DA 23 15,176.47 SF 3 x 100,88 z 13' 3' = POOL .52 CF PROVIDED JIf�'' '11J1IL DA Pervious 10,757.46 SFx 0.3 = 3,227.24 SF USE: 3 12'0 % 13' ED POOLS OR 104 V.F. a aJ6/too• REv1®Ae relowtr®colkene Lam'J DA 6 Impervious .66 TF Pervious 6Area SFx 0.3 = W.41 SF Impervious 4.418.a SF _1.0 = 4.419.01 SF ( ) � ���LL111 Pervious 31,505.15 SFx 0.3 - 9,451.55 SF Impervious 12,359.41 SF x 1.0 = 12,359.41 SF s 71�re ,ky,��� � ��,I,e�,� s Impervious 22670.57 SFx 1.0 = 22,870.57 SF Total Runoff Area 12,543.41 SF Total Runoff Area 7,648.25 SF DA 23 7,846.25 BF x 0.5' = 3,823.73 CF STORAGE REQUIRED res Gravel 3,012.94 SFx 0.7 - 2,109.06 SF 3,823.13 CF / 100.88 SF/VF = 37.90 VF 4 s/wm FROSEDwR®SET 1 Total Runoff Area 34,231.17 SF DA 14 14,879.14 SF 3 x 100.88 x 13' ED = 4,236.96 CF PROVIDED RM I Pervious 9,317.54 SF x 0.3 = 2,795.26 SF DA 24 41,144.16 SF USE: (3) 12'0 X le ED POOLS OR 42 V.F. a W1221M rEwa®oLlsxa�AarslaLtelr DA 7 83,007.87 Pond 4,996.20 SF x 1.0 = 4,996.20 SF Pervious 32,141.62 SF x 0.3 - 9,64249 SF &H 1 Pervious 35,078.88 x 0.3 = 10,523.66 Impervious 565.40 SFx 1.0 = 555.40 SF Impervious 9,002.54 SFx 1.0 - 9,002.54 SF DA 26 28,251.51 SF x 0.5' = 14,125.76 CF STORAGE REQUIRED 2 wJxVm xv�A•ratflanTta moans I.OURIES Impervious 41,274.34 x 1.0 - 41,274.34 Total Runoff Area = 8,356.8 SF Total Runoff Area = 18.645.03 SF 14,125.76 CF / 100.88 SF/VF = 140.03 VF 1 INN/" RLAw®uraurrel CLEW SF Gravel 6,654.65 x 0.7 = 4,858.26 9 x 100.88 x 16' ED = 14,526.72 CF PROVIDED BRINGS 15 50,676.22 DA 25 49,732.74 SF USE: (9) 12'0 X 18' ED POOLS OR 144 V.F. 4e/2'e/a° yr nAllsn®TalaWx aFeaulFpin i GRAPHIC SCALE Totai Runoff Aroa = 56,456.26 Pervious 43,159.82 SF x 0.3 = 12,947.95 SF Pervious 39,523.60 SFx 0.3 = 11,857.08 SF �� DA 8 38,336.8 SF Impervious 7,516.40 SF x 1.0 = 7,516,40 SF Impervious 10,209.14 SF x 1.0 = 10,209.14 SF I � 1 Total Runoff Area 20,464.35 SF Total Runoff Area = 22,066.22 SF SITE PLAN - GRADING owN BY., M Iso o so Iss zco 400 Pervious 6,881.62 SFz 0.3 = 5,064.49 SF OND DESIGN: IML-AW-M Impervious 18,46209 SFx 1.0 = 1!1209.59 F DA 16 Pervious .75 SF DA 26 56,247.66 SF r� TIB RBY.. RJR Gravel 2,9Area SFx 0.7 = 209.52 SF Pervious 27,377.37 SFx 0.3 = 8,213.21 SF Pervious 27,029.87 SFx 0.3 - 8,108.96 SF THE POND DESIGN WILL MEET. SUFFOLK COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATA un/a6 7 Total Runoff Area = 23,736.10 SF Impervious 21,106.41 SF x 1.0 = 21,106.41 SF Impervious 15,765.30 SFx 1.0 - 15,765.30 SF W FEET DA 9 80,527.50 SF Gravel 3,725.97 SFx 0.7 = 2,608.18 SF Gravel 858.26 SF x 0.7 = 600.78 SF CKKO�' B,IA Pervious 29,:561.35 9Fx 0.3 = 8,808.41 SF Total Runoff Area = 31,927.80 SF Off-Sita 12,588.23 SFx 0.3 = 3,776.47 TF smawlEsa AT Impervious 44,099.20 SFx 1.0 = 44,099.20 SF Total Runoff Area 28,251.51 SF NOTE Gravel 7,066.95 SFx 0.7 = 4,946.87 SF DA 17PeM 142,215.12 s512 SF 8,597.68 SFx 0.3 - 20,579.30 SF CUTCHOGUE DATB V17/05 THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE Total Runoff Area = 57,854.47 SF Total DA Runoff = 1,311,178.51 SF Townr OF aeOUTtiOLO. SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YOgK PROPERTY OF NELSON & POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR impervious 64,837.52 SFx 1.0 0 66.145. 4 SF OISTgICT 10 . asaa T 0m 102, BLoem rn, LOT aa.3 ,108 No; 0002 Gravel ff Area SFx 0.7 = 6,145.94 SF ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE TI VIOLATION OF SECTION Total Runoff Area = 91,582.77 SF 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS FRE Nay - TNLL BE PROSECUTED. NELSON 8c POPE ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVLLF_N.Y.11747-283 SCALE r-tar (630427-5686 FAX(69)427-5620 Wssne4gpopeaam gam, 30F27 LLL Z Z z :3J I © . O�Q FV'- Q NOW/FORMERLY OF C NOW90TRMBiLY OF Q BERTHA KOREN 61U G 6 6rA C DI I 1901.44' (DEED) FRANK YACHWCHIOL 1904.80' (ACTUAL) In f�( \ S38'30'50"E (DEED) _- -- / /' w GREAT PEOONIC BAY O 538'24'20"E (ACTUAL) -� _ w • ° A 4 �� ,�•- ,�"•°!t'•'o- DA-3 uL'k WATER WELL LOCATION AS PER � ' DA-2 yL"it�wp{k� //- LAAA • �'^' jO94 °M10•y °A�aRmes • •� �QjC' _ a°lA0•i.° 1p4° On �n„� �° u° ,° e t° A •o • " � Sx.°CeAaeEla.r aOFFICE OF WATER Q E RESOURCES, VERIFY IN FIELD J SyICAELED.P•�IVO�WS�MILE pMILE E toO O / [)\%T V/ oMFe AFAN T. �• b g is 1. w• NOW/FORMERLY OF 7'1 \ ` n �' " •tr • " DA- 1pRtae. '. •'t0 537'04'40"E 2 3.68' 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOID DA-5 �:�. -+v'lg_ A_ 4 ® ® " / tM ORMT•e - 10 - - o7 SIN /• re• " 9e0• O v 4 �m0 \ rl , x _ .► DAL-fi 4� Iz•°°"3. Lt •a •+� ' r _ 1x•486,--"-Y1" of y'� .\11�/ .o •.e.� . " tt of •° nue y, w.•�' Res. •• =-' �O°-o tNn DRA AG TR TUR AB E f/ '3 • yaol to W M " "n°R.lan " . RLNac A-B • RE Dp N I SiRUGNTOP GRATE Sig • INVDtT . OFPiH BOTTOM \ n1 d A �.o '0 j •A • Np R,Y. § - /' 1 • •p DA- r7 m O 5 AD2 G 33.9 Y - �V \ 111 • • F O e E ,,.!° • - �1 E a 1�+I •� C--U � A03 G 33.7 2' 30.2 \ " " Elte MOPa RWl• 1 pl,°e • T. .8���.\"1 • r" G 323 Y 28.1 \ \ / - v• t\ B S37'04'40 E _ - p _1 T ADe 95.0 u C328 2' 27.85 - - A09 G 322 2' 2878 °• o / E ° / �I ° 4r "" � \ NN GRIFFING STREET AD++ cze.D 2 25.25.5 5 u / • td• " vy•ta `� � i• yp1' NN(N)! AAD01134 GG 2267..205 22'' 2213 POND - ci� ADIS G 25.8 2' 2230 �\ \ : ,: Qy ° . % _ A•• \/ -, „ri f AD1e o 33s Y 3o.D - ` \ .•L� >• ,E :7- ,ga e _ Rt.6A0 DA•13 DA- 14 •g 'Y!�'` �.,� 24.95 6' lwx FauxrAx O1 � .o iia nwia _ -�Rt°r.tvr ` E F 1."n•t ` d• I' w -`Y, -,(ti1 G52 T 3h4 8' 24.20 5' w �\ i 1,' r "7A A{.O Mn _ _ NYMVNI ° F W.. �I GSS T 335 8' 27.81 5• - NOW/FORMDTLY OF � s.rt ° P^ D MOP w w �WL'w _ 055 T 33.7 B' '^Mlee°ItnN.IIW • Jt �t a 2hJ5 5' OW/ M• BEf13E l'^ NN11•N93 • lr (i!4 i 33.. FY k W U M F. HEANEY /^ O 1 \ 9 eQ ODE I - 1 >R"ee M �. ;I�.:URI A a �.i F� ° POND .A, d .ta ' D p GSB T 35.7 8' 24.OD S (] 1 b 11UP 11110- AN;• OCE rR1Rt eMMIRH Fi9 • D A- 1 1 A 1 n m C57 r 34.2 e' w 27.50. N 28.27 5' _ U✓ 1 ® 1Vtn•(twlfpYMf°°1 0 ,trr • `' NOW/FORMERLY aF - 0 a �" v AR10 I.M. G56 T 35.8 B' 26.25 5' • MI �+• 0 r • 7• T G59 T 338 e' 25.18 S' S3713'30"E DEED) 1 '' ° • RtIR IC4 a 8 N37'13'30 W �- - - - -4�•� csto r 347 e' 31.12 s - S37'04'30" 221.47' u • Rmr ,cyte o Als e"'A f Eol y .• / \ O Y�/ G511 T 320 8' 24.29 6' esu •Nnr, �✓ ' �• 143!< O "'N. 0•V tr• NOW/FORMERLY OF / / D A-l9�' 91N1•E © ! 0 Aa, / LS WS '"` - '� ROMAN CATHOUO / It pd a CHURCH OF / 1. ALL DRAINAGE PIPE TO BE 18" CCP 0 1% - a •* 6+ B °• \ ® r• u 4� /ll���y. f�N/% MINIMUM SLOPE UNLESS NOTED ON PLANS. b DA- 1 5 sA 3e �, \ c " °1 c"' ' O • lE DA-2 a / 2. ALL APPROPRIATE ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE hI 1 6' � t �`' ~ m 9E69 `\ RL-39a •',DAN• 1 B 79 .• • O APPROPRIATE UTIDTY COMPANY. Z ��,• Ic 'QR • r tw g • 1M A " •y uR O � w / 6I• E ••� A pA4• I fm -17 40 •� / ® , '�•6 RLV).° iRy4G / • �4F. 1" a °A� NOW"WURPo.Y OF fi� " ,,� IEe / •4• • 1 i Laxc IsIAND W os Nu D A-1 ��>4`�4\• +� 4,�,�,.. w "/.. d 1 DA-20 •>0 1,4 ,° " ® es w Ii0 / GIL- = x x \ \ ,01 y R 1 " " Rulw.io Rw9a '0 A �:C• m j A �'�'�7' "� O °u Qn ' 7"e \Y Vo q x � �� A � • •� " -'4 O A � �t X e m.•rz0 � m I x �Q / / �R4�7�5 I DA' A o � _EE-s - _ - DA_2 \ ` / O O o 1 'Q1 Rtte 177 �1 _ _ / -�"I• a •° ' ' '° 6 \'fCs/ LMlsa Lllr•3•k ,,,� /$ W ' "•°t'i• R m Ru�+Tra Oq i '�°�. mna rR"n. _ '7 - - / \ / - / - I� axat°isx wtF \ lr+ f •C _. - - - - - _ _ - er• DA-23 "cvs no. • • �1 N36'S4'20"W I I NOW/pRMERLY 1 12009.51' (DEED) I of 11 ADO RSAU,ISE 1 I NOW/FORNERLYO I 20.22' (ACTUAL 6 O NOW/FORMERLY OF O MIEIBL NOW/FOIIMEI9.Y OF NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORNEflLY OF PAUL LA k C017(iTTA SFASUWEWC2, NOW/FORNEPo.Y OF NOW/FOflMEALY OF ST�AItEIE A DO, �A. I EXISTING PRIVATE HENRY k D09dtAH NOW/FORMEflLY OF IUGHlANO ROAD CORP. DAND A I WARDCFW, k YOHPoNO RL U'1 k DONNA M. FRANCIS WATER WELL JOHN k ISABEL Z, 150' SANITARY RADIUS 1 k GAME C. FROM CENTER OF (TYPICAL FOR 11) I O I N a w (TYPICAL FOR 11) J - - m DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE SiRUCNflE TOP GRATE 512E • INVERT EFF. DEPTH BOTTOM STRUCNflE TOP GRATE SIZE a INVERT EFF• OEP7H BOT30MSTRTOP GRATE 517E 0 INVERT EFF• 4; BO LP52 T 36.8 1 TTOM M43 0 �� _ S 10.00, N 18.47 lPt T 38.9 12' 1].38 73' +7.60 1P52 2' EW 28.83 14' 10.3 _ le.w - - 1736 13' 77.80 1P63 T 36.9 12 EW 2839 14' 783 IHM O 2250 - - LP2 T 3S•B 12' T 33.8 72 W 28.53 14' 70.3 CBA G 3227 - 27.85 IPS T 35.0 12' 17.38 13 11.70 �� T 20.5 12 2201 12' 10.5 0847 G }220 - 27.86 - - IP4 T 34.7 IV +7.20 13 I7.B0 LP55 _ 28.40 - - lP5 T 74.1 12' 17.38 73 11,80 lPfi6 T 30.8 12 80 0.53 7M 70.5 GBA G 34.80 - 3030 - - LP6 T 35.2 12' 17.27 13 I1.80 IPS] T �' 0 12'-� 15.80 e' 70.5 CB49 G 34.80 - 3883 - LP7 T 34.9 12' 17.3e 13 11.60 LP58 27.05 _ SANITARY FLOW CALCULATIONS: SINGLE FAMILY PRC UNITS: LPe T 34.6 12' 17.28 iJ' 17.80 CB7 G 3209 = 20.39 S,W 27.25 TV 18.7 CB1A G 34.0 30.50 ALLOWABLE SIZE FLOW wntrtA FOR SIN EMILY UNf15 LP9 T 34.9 12' C82 C 3288 - 20.18 = = CBfi2 G 33.62 - - 2 003-311,33SF X 755 % 300 GPD/UNIT = 22,537.25 OPD r 1P10 T 34.7 72' N,S 27.01 14' 187 _ 27.20 - - UH7 T 388 4' 20,000 SF/UNIT 150 GPD/UNIX 2 UNITS = 300 GPD lPN T 34.4 12' N,SW 27.26 14' 16.7 CO3 G 3272 - 74 MH7A T 31.53 4 - PROPOSED FLOW 300 GPD X 2 DAYS = SOD GALLONS IP72 T 34.5 12' E 27.0+ 74' 16.7 174 G 3282 25.21 = _ MH2A T 34.40 4' S 21.23, N 24.08 (USE: 1200 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 8Y X 4' LD.) LPI3 T 34.2 72' N 27.01 14' 16.7 CB5 G 325 _ MH4 T 33.3 IF 139 PRC UNITS O 150 GPD/UNI = 20,850 GPD 30D GPD/1.5 GAL/SF/DAY = 200 SF OF WALL AREA REQUIRED LP14 T 134'1 12 25'16 14 11.7 C88 G 31,51 - 30.77 _ _ MONS T 33.77 4' S 21.32 N 24.73 _ CLUBHOUSE POOL AREA 2,000 SF B'e RING - 25 SF/FT OF HEIGHT' LP79 T 3h+ +7 25.2e 14' 11.5 fH7 C 31.77 _ 30.81 - _ MX5 T J337 4' GYM AREA 1,0110 SF O 0.3 GPD 3DO GPD 200 SF/25 SF/FT - 8 V.F. 1P78 T 9h1 12' 25.17 14• 11.5 CBe C 34.77 - 3027 - - MHO T 34.6 - MEEIING / OFFICE AREA 1,500 SFO 0.08 GPD/SF 90 GPD USE: BY % 12' Ee. LEACHING POOL) LP77 T '•34.1 12' 232e 14' 71.5 CB9 G 37.71 - 27.19 - - MHOA T 35.73 4' S 20.35. N 23.85 - INDOOR AND OUTDOOR POOLS 75 BATHERS O 5 GPD/BATHER 37Z GPS ( 1P78 T 34.3 12' 25.16 14' 11.5 CB70 G 4.87 26•73 _ - MH7 T 35.5 4' 2887 TOTAL PROPOSED FLOW 21,615 GPD LP79 T 34.3 12 25.2a 14' 11.5 CBI+ G 33.09 - 28•'17 _ MH7A T 29.9 4' - ..SEPRC TANKS PERMITTED MULTi FAMILY AFFORDABLE UNITS: LPZD r 34.3 +z' 25.16 u' ++s 7H1z c aeJ - 26.87 - _ MHe T 7h1 4' 2+•+7 LP21 T 93.2 1Y N,E 25.3 14' 11.5 CB73 G 31,77 - 28.77 - - _ _ G•NS SYSTEM FOR 3 RUI OMG UNITS - 29,37 MHeA T 36.0 4' E iB.42, W 26.13 - LP22 T 332 72' EW 24.7 74' 71.5 CB14 G 3287 - _ MHBB T 33.22 4 2832 150 GPD/UNI X 3 UNIIS - 450 GPD 1P23 T 93.3 12 E,W 2hB2 74' 71.5 CBI5 G 32.87 - 20.00 - - MHOA T 3288 4' E 1837. x25.04 - 450 GPD X 2 DAYS = 900 GAU•ONS LP24 T 73.5 12 EW 2h7 14' CB15A G 4.77 = 28.70 - - MH70 T 34.7 4' 27.81 - - AFFORDABLE (USE 1200 GALLON SEPTIC 'FANK 8'0 X 4' LD.) 1P25 T 738 12' W 2h82 14' 77.5 CB78 G 7277 - 28.77 - = ° 0/16/a0M 9BY7®AB151 puFFEeCOw'IBl1B B3+ MH1DA T 30.0 4' N 20.25. S 23.83 450 GPD/1.5 GAL/SF/DAY - 300 SF OF WALL AREA REQUIRED 1P28 T 70.2 12' N,E 2334 15 +1.7 CB77 G 7239 - 27A7 - _ MH11A T 330 4' 27.02 - - s 7/21/m IEVIe®A9 PE71I[itEW O'IEHB®OIMFEBOOA7®JI8lE 1000 COM.Hile FBS Elqqqcgm 8'• RING - 25 SF/FE OF RING 1P27 T7Ew 23.22 16 71.7 CB78 .77 4 °107101B�800 - (2) I SF/FT = 12 V.F. LP2B T ;323 +2' EW 23.34 15' 11.7 CB79 G 7238 = 27.52 = - MH72 T 35.7 w 27.41 _ - (USE: (2) 8'e X r E.D. LEACHING POOLS) LP29 T ,323 12' EW 23'12 15' 71.7 CB20 03238 27.04 MH73 T 33.3 4' 20.17 a 00/921°7 p6Wt®a9e11d1�A•t331Cl/BlF SJR LP30 T 32.4 72' EW 2334 IV 11.7 CB21 G 3288 29'08 MHim T 34.+0 4' S 21.32, N 27.fi9 2 U/2905 EYL�ABPatODHe fXil•@DB LOOMED IP37 T }24 12' EW 23.22 15' 11.7 C822 C J2eB 27.85 MM14 T 33.6 4 N 7878 S 25.6+ GANG SYSTEM FOR 4 BUMUll ANO$ 1P32 T 324 +2' EW 23.34 15• 11.7 CB23 C 1290 - 28.85 MH75 T 33.9 4' 27.15 - - 1 19/0°/Oe w--'AB®uYdRP61aaE eVR® 750 GPO/UNR % 4 UNITS = 800 GPD LP33 T 324 12' W 2322 15' 17.7 C824 G 3290 - 29.00 = - MR16 T 336 IV N,E 1877 = _ DOW" 6U GRIBROTOTOWNOF000R7a'D SR 60D GPD X 2 DAYS = 1,2110 GALLONS 1P34 T 27.0 17 S,EW 2201 12 10.5 CB25 G 3280 - 27.37 - MH77 T 37.2 4' 28.14 IE718A7N Be (USE 1200 GALLON SEPTIC TANK BY % 4' LD.) IP35 T 27.2 72' EW 21.79 12' 10.6 CB26 G 1290 - 28.80 _ - _ _ Nes DATE lP3e T 27.1 12' EW 2201 12' 10.5 CB27 G 33.10 - 29.50 _ - M 11BA T 3249 ;• 6: - - WE PLAN - UTILITY PLAN °�'``�. GRAPHIC SCALE 609 GPD/1.5 GAL/SF/DAY = 400 SF OF WALL AREA REQUIRED {p37 T 28,1 72 ES 21.79 72' 70.5 (828 C 33.78 - 27.77 = MH79 T 36.14 4' 27.88 _ DSM IS 8'0 RING = 25 SF/FT OF RING X38 T 277 72' N,S 21.77 12' 10.6 CB29 G 9290 - 28.40 - 1 �• w0 400 SF/25 SF/FE = 16 V.F. LP39 T 29.6 12' W 27.81 / E 21.56 12' 10.5 C830 G 3290 - 20.25 _ - MH2OA T D4.2 : 26.54 - - THE HERBAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE 1/T/ mD o so loo 200 (USE: (2) 8.O X B' E.D. LEACHING POOLS) _ - - LP4012' N.S,E 2203 12' 10.5 (X337 C 53.90 - MH21 T 3h1 4' M. /�� E•BRVATI�A/r� LP41 T 3D.1 12' N,W 21.53 IV 10.5 CB32 C 33.90 - 29.85 _ - MH21A T 33.7 4' 27.35 - - C E CHOGUE �D�. CLLR N00SF LP42 T 37.0 72' N,E 21.78 12' 10.5 CB33 G 33.87 - 2B.fi1 _ - MH22 OMIT ( IN 1'EET ) GYM AREA 1.000 SF O 0.3 GPD 300 GPD LPA T 35.9 12 0.W 28.30 16' 13.4 CB34 G33.e7 _ 3D•OB - _ 25.41 _ = DAIS 1/D MH2J T 33.2 4 TOWN OF 90UTHOLO. SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK MEETING / OFFICE AREA 1,500 SF O 0.06 GPD/SF 90 GPD X44 r 3;,2 12' N,W 2882 i6' 73.4 CB35 G3287 - 29.17 - - MH24 T 320 4' N 37.M, E 26.30 - 'TOB No: DDC NOTE: INDOOR AND OUIBOOR POOLS 75 BATHERS O 5 GPD/BATHER 370 �A T 35,e 12' EW 25.52 +B 154 0037 83277 _ 2977 = = MH2b T 33.80 4 S 26.40. E 17.10 - ols-FRIGT 1000. SECTION 102. BLOCK rn, LOT E TOTAL = 789 GPD 28.74 _ _ RLE 130' 765 GPD X 2 DAYS = 1,530 GALLONS LPA T 37.1 72' W.E 25.30 18' 13.4 C730 034.1 _ 26.97 MH27 T 29.7 4 17•}7 _ _ N E LSO N POP E THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE (USE 2000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK IWO X 4• LD.) 1P47 T 35.7 72' w.E 27.30 Ifi' 134 CB38 G 34.1 - _ _ MH27 T 325 L' te.33 - - CAOa 0002 PROPERTY OF NELSON & POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR LPA T 35.7 1Y W.SE 26.72 18' 1&4 OB39 G3206 _ 20.99 - - MH27 G 247 4' 20.00 ENGINEERS O SURVEYORS ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION 765 GPD/1.5 GAL/SF/DAY = 570 SF OF WALL AREA REQUIRED Lp49 T 35.0 +2' S•W 25.92 16' 13.4 CB40 G3207 - 2832 - - SCALE-. 7'• ADDITIONS OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS eY RING 1 25 L/SSF/FE OF RING - - 1)4 WALT FAX(6 ROAD, 62DMELWOE,W11110 47 tBe (741 G30.74 27.24 WILL BE PROSECUTED. 765 SF/25 SF/FF - 20.4 VF 1P60 T 35.8 12' EW 20.3D IB' 13.4 (631)427-5665 FAX(890427-562D WWw.neMuiPOR°.9uO SHEEP ' 4C1F (USE (2) B•0 X 11' E.D. LEACHING POOLS) LP51 T 39.7 12' SE 25.52 70' 13.4 CB42 G30.74 - 27.01 AL NOW/FORMERLY OF I a ESTATE OF I NOW/FdIMERLY OF �W n FRANK MACHINCHIq( BERTTHHA KURC7EN51f1 O \ A a 13 c u 7 w GREAT PECOMC BAY a A A ! A z c A 24 23 4 c Q 1 xaWAaWeYs KEY MAP A WA nONaNe6 la cWl v 1� SCALE:r-0.5 MILE O 1 ttNOW MEALY OF 2 = roW�sounla0 A A a M SMAS J A A O PTL efi0 I O E n.l = U 11 EAS I N D q{5 i" re0ue P yeP'Til- 2 OND qp t GRIFFING STREET 1 E wAmllamuna Milt" NOW/FORMENLY OF 1 �,4.AIP SrAnc WAm p.tt PALL PROP.a r WILLIAM M. HEAE NAe.._ Wn==Arm M��)• ND h WILLIAM F. HEANEY if - 4 p SgMWAAx>od POND ! NMe JSAI.kSan am OnR( unci .9 Q *� � Io3MWx NOW/FORMERLY OF 4 c p R114 ARTO LTD. WA NOW/FORMBTLY OF RgAAN CATHOLIC a CHURCH OF SACRED HEART 4 C 0 \ o _ BE*ON TRE31 a Treviso Luminaire NOW/FORMERLY OF A E A Pee no LONG ISLAND WNEYARDS INC. A A 1 i I 4e w 47 do EI A T I, n E A ] —14' ' GM 1 1 13 i — e@ — RWCSMA —12' — CRASH AV — T� Poll MounM1e PMM�N) me cr Access no NOW/FgtMERLY OF —11 BARSAD, NOLAND RAD OF NOW/FORMEALY OF ALDO 4: LOUISE NOW/YgtMEALY OF 0 COQ(, NDW/TORMERLY a SHELBY, Q —)O' HIGHLAND ROAD CORP. DAWD A NOW/FORMERLY OF OEMBROSKY, NOW ORMERLY a NOW/FORMERLY OF h MOHRING RT. W 4t DONNA M. I OIMNEY, STANLEY JR. EMBROSKY, PAUL M. R CONCETTA STASIUKIEWIC7, J 6FRANCIS J.: MARIE C. I STANLEY�• I I HENRY h DEBONAH NOW/TORMERLY OF W —y' ARTICELU. W JOHN k ISABEL MI —7' —5' L CALCULATION SUMMARY —4 AREA NAME DIMENSIONS GRID TYPE i pis SPAC 1 GROUP I AVE I MAX I MIN MAX MIN AVE IN —3' PenaemM unto Heritage 14' Height 2462.89x1056.66Ft Grade N—H191091 ip.uu I <+> 10.4d 112.bb JUDO I NIA I N/A —2' I ® U STREET LIGHTING SCHEDULE shown With VALL'Velitemo Cover"Pale it YP I SYMBOL I DESCRIPTIONf(1M P0 HPS 16000 LUMENS 0 11 6" POLE TING BALLAST L F Y 20415BIh Avenue Clmle Eaet I BRJen1On,FL342031 PH'941.75566941 FX'911,95155351 wwx.Eeaoonplxeucecom LP , BEACON PRODUCTS 15 0.85 121 TRE31-150HPS—XXX—D—SPR5CAT.# T.B.D. i e W/E/WXM �Me®ae em I3MFTEe CaIABlIe 9.R rn UNIT LIGHTING SCHEDULE n 712Mae EMeEDABPB R EW OF pVFT®DATEDJA�zoucCMBAB F® TYP SYMBOL I DESCRIPTION LAMP LUMENS I MOUNTING BALLAST 1!0':75b 4 6/07107 PER Wp COOPER LIGHTING 03122107 / 633-WP-CF2/13 2 F13 1800 WALL MOUNTED a ® B L M 0 v � ® 1 N/Oe/OB TEV®uYO1R PBI CLIEM BqP� m m/al/a BIIeAEnEDTOTaAW aF BDuman Bt o GRAPHIC SCALE NA DAMRBASIONa LIGHTING PLAN OWN B'' JM co p so lap 2ao 4ao raq DBCYN.BY: BJR t IN FEET I THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE 1/17/05 0 an]ATm AT CWD BY. SJR O CUTCHOGUE NOTE w TOWN OF SOUTHOLO. SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK y THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT SERVICE AND ARE THE DATE: 1/17/05oIE3TRIcr 1000. SECTION Loa, BLocK 01, LOT 33.3 PROPERTY OF NELSON POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR JOB Na' 0002 NELSON POPE OAOP�ENa. ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS WILLas BE PROSECUTED. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS o 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD.MELWULE,NY 11/47-2H6 BCALB i-lOD' (636 427-5665 FAX(63)427-5620 www.rWoollpopw,cohn SHER. 22 OF 27 dr _ __ __ ,� _ . � sax - ' " - •� .0 x e - as .9 .4�aaaa ^91 a xa 9.3x94111 - .9.4.°..4949 ^� .03 a. - x e ` ^� 5 11991 431• 5= 5 n3x8 «1`i7 _.0.0^�•�.� ?0.94333 -144442 R £ g s Q .9222x22�^�^���•� •�^�929?^� "9x31 32 e5f '! rd 1.9 a+,�?•'� - - +1555 5•^x9-5x15 ,42•�� •�•� •� •� _ _ _ 3NIl HO1dW � 25 -�•��142xA49339 ��^�•��^��•�^'! _ 54.9�� 4425• " _ .g 5s 5^9^3.5 " " 8 553 1x4-5115 '1x9 �•�•� 3 �� � Via+!- a 3F 553 2 5J ^�•�^�� ^�•�+! ee .•� 89^�a - ;429'6^�?�•� '159-59442 =4.92-5AA � o 3N1� HOiVV4 2 _ 15 - _114 _x299931 1.0^�9•-•� ".-a a2�9�•'' 3521 e e2a5:2 2.41?? - ^.^.8 _ e "•�ax9 " 4'63 .41 33 �� 93 x •�a 9 sd.sa8� i2_ ` _ 1199 �^��� 39.91x'5 daa^g."m_'^�'!^3' a" 4xx•�^� ���•�^�•�� 442222 lxeo - _ - " " " _ " " e " �^��^�9333-�•� ^ 144x4 -��142 2249�•'�x " �^�•'�•�9 " 5933 32423,221.9x22 5 3.983 8x^1 5 ''93x.9 •�•� _ •�� 4933• 142 ' •9.9'2^9 ., '�2 _+'� _3.3^!'! a 9•� _ re•�•9.0^0^0^�� F2•�•�^����^a'laad 5 •a 11•x.1 ,^? - ' ^�^��^0�•�•�•2•��•�^9��� .5•2.5.9 ee �+ o z z 222115 x399-53 "'63.9 515 3.9493442555551'x^9 5F 5.3 _x.1.08=. § x433 -•_ ^0^9.9 .0.0 •�^� .x.g 79 424'6.93x95 �"=^- -^- - - - - - - x'6-5 x'61.99429x55 • " e 5.0� _ 5'a.3a?8 °9x1'6 193 §531 a •0.0.9 ^0.0.9 49 •9.0.0.9 3'.9x993.942•§ a � '.a.542 442 rim .5 2• = tl1�149933xx 'A d e e 54x8 _ '!' 1x`,41 x3^9.9^9^0^9^9.9999911 _x 215.9 as 21x22 2913x9 - _ ,3391=.1a a -^,+!•9.9x3 33.9.0.9x^9^93 _ 221222339-5x 4 9-5x " 151-5215 x•933.95 _- ,�,�99319 453^0'!x^09 ^933333.9 43 9342 43 •9^93 3.033x•9 _ j° -x421 _5 • 5^�3a 3^9.944x1 42 3333333x^9.933-., 551 3 115 333^03 ".93333 •92.9444 1x212 .9333x4 a •9^9^9.9 5424231x4'6-514242-., 2 1242^2222.933.9'2 e e 33.9 e5"33.94'6-5.9.9x311 r2s 313 '3 a.95 '941.9'6151 33^93.0 39 .5 -2433 33.9^933 11'642 " . •9'9'!'3 95 534424 333.0 523.999933x142935 " -3 3x^0^9.03.93 21421499 444222 2 s22-x2922331.5 x33 ^92333.91.9 x15 02.9x3.92 "'9 3'a 33^99.9 d 423.9•02x.9 •9.9.9'9 •9.9'92 2aa^0 3.9933^9933 d 5 ^5•'9'.91 3•ad 3.144x3 •915 - •9.913.03333.9•0233x „ .21.9• .5x3 '13x33 222222 .9x1522215499334-5x15 93334-5-531-5-5-53^02^31x95 " 45 -=•?•='�"-' \ 594241 _ " .9x^033 3 4 2-5 -2.02 93x494399.93x�4a - '� 8�n^•tl 5 e x42942-533194.9 x'" 542-5333999913.9425x ° x •T42a3.9x x13 222^9^92 2222222-2339331993399493999333911313^93 4 5• -88981 - xxx " 4231 3 13 42 215 1 333^9333.03x333 °:1 89Fa _ 214222 24^933.0^0333.9.9^933^9^033^0^0 033.0^02335 9 388x-"•? '3 d•a - - e 3.9 •9 d•9 d 32 -22 -22 -2^93 3333^0333x•02•--a daa " a �a^9 'a •^ 122x33^0.9333 ' 333 x 3.033333x333-.", d3 x2233 ` 4^1x3 322222 ; O a Q 8 49 -233.9333.0^0 333.92.933.9^9233^0.0x3^9.95 9•F ra84 _ _ _ _ _•�e e- 521 9 ' da 12 -222 22 333 3.9x9 - x " -5 $tlxx 5 e e „33x33^93.0.0'69 --5424242.93333.0^02x•93^9 9 1a�3a 5aa 42 ^9x3.0 =3x•0 222222 �+ Ax - e.s x - 2.92x42 " °x44 -33.93 - 24 ' 44 3.93 x^023 2333 a 33.9 ° 3^9^9^93x333^9.9^9331429.9 •^1 9 4x99 -3339 2x2222 S 94933.9'6-51 332333^09-5x141.1-", 9 _ _a? l 3 - eF •9^93 429.933.93^09^93333x^03-xa 5 9?82 93995 199429-533 222222 W 2 J 0 W Y 222151515 -x999-5x42.9 g�0 333 33^9331943x395 d - 598?, f8 . 3 _ 55•e^033• 3^933 429 3^9.9.9 - 415 _154 333 9a -- "•9.93 ' .05- 0.93333^0^03 x33^0^9.933333^92^0x33 9 5 _A^°d^9 a83F4^ x`944444-513149 44421-5 222222 -9431142.9E ?4243224 94291242424.5 421--' -429x'- ^x a ;=•9x32 32x32 •-=x15 ^033.9 15-54 15 24 -332 1 314 '' " _ h,3 3399931x42 54111 x 32.9^9 x333 x^92 99 ^=-=3.9 3? '-_3 a ==3.9x333.0.03333 222222 g 0 I� y kk!! (� 9 2222^22 991314 -•' 53399449 5555^ 425=�+ 88"^_8=. - 5,='03x3 1143x993 333.0 222 42 _2.9 -•933 e42 x'23 " x 421 . ` 5 r x3^0^0.92.9 " ',x421333332334421 "9 848 1.2_3 42 5 41.511.1 333333 222222 �[ LL 22222 ^0333x ° •' S9 ' _ _88x8F5 " -_'" _ "= 4241x1'6.3 3x32 222 222 152 -^9x3 9 " 5 9x1 lJCa _ _ _ 3 4313.033• •0`4 - x^93?•'�'�5 '- '9 - 5x14.933.03 333.9 _2x2 2^9.92 _44 -3^92 19 .91421x.9 5 15 "155 _ _ '-.9.9x49 43223333^949314242 31 '39�? x239 5542x14449-511x9141242A2.9 W Y 22222 x944 " "a_ 3 d- e e e e 1x8^9^95 5 e - 433x3^033 2233 x22 _•92222 _.94 _33.9 1x42 a 424-511429 - 51��. : Fa A^-3 2 _25"_ - - 1x4242 °4242493333999'6x15 4 5 9898 .3_5 x 933x33 - ----22 � T x222 131142 _ 92-51949 _ d a add - dx x^933.9 3393 -222 -2x2222 _152 °2x3 311 4 - 541 43.9x.99^03333.94112 ' 4 9^=815 93c 92.,939^9 "93333222222 O iC O 0 • �p 1x141 933x9 ° e49 99 _ x 2 x - - - 5"9.9x99 3993 - 415 - 2.222.92 415 -299 399 49-5x14341 2498E .51a) ! 5e 315 . 542429433349931335 x933 9_^_ 5.9x1311 54249944x122 VV Sa' 22222 339x92.9x 4 2 x - 542 9 - - 499=_ � ax 9A 9 2 - _ 45544.9x9994331142424.9 e 5391 991 G4242-5934 ° 49x3 32222 r lllU m Z $ 22222 3994'6334242 2 " 425.9 153�< 5493de4 .. 415 II t.2 339.9•' 21 - 42422242 22 223 x93 _ 111x1 - 5 � "9339 ,25144-51 3x9.9 223 •22222222 415 222 3424.934331493x,94-5 5^x899 4848 4 x " 2991.2 x9^91399933311935 _ a 5.9x -39x9.91 =999 992222 U < Z V Y O 0: .9152x2 -5-5-2 11 ,4x,5 1 _ _ _ _ _ A _ 331991449311 394.9 221 2^92.222222 x15 22.9 9934293394432429 5 531n29 391 Ya9y __ " _- ex33x99= 2424249331399-534x5.9 ^' x 9.9993 93x3 2^2222.9LU 2222.9 x391111.1 - - - -- 42 .93 a" _ _ _ _ - o a .4aF - - ' aA - A e99 154-53193-5159 x932 222 •9.922222222 -52 x22 3x992993-51429 ° . ° 9 5s.a�x +^92x_ a dx�.-=x.93x99 - "22313399931x424255.9 x3333 " 9x133 222222 W W N W ® � � 0 WLL 24222 943-5x42 "E4215 -_ ., e4 dee 2 _ _ _a8 _ _ _ _ _ =59^9 8 « x""1x9 x11-511493 99x2 -412 2.022^9.222.922 4a 229 99239939x9^95 5 `48 _ = da"x14242442931 4 53424933319'63x15- 29933.9 .9x424933 222222 ^22122 x9933 _ _" _ _ _ _555 a _ _ AA 8 a9 x333999-53.91x ' a^5 x .� 429x33399 .9.9433x3 -22222.2 Z U a Q `" µ Z F"� 22222 9993 •` 499 2e- 3 934.9 88- °999x99 ., -151x339 3392 _222 .9122221542151515 -5 2.22 .9393x999 339^58 4 _ _•3 ,542424333x42 �. - Z Q LL x F9a4 5,3.93x999 •915 °.9424933339.99x42.9 e ^'~933rd x 333993x2222222 � i5 � � a � r � S � = Z � � 3� 22222 49-53 424-5-514242 "„ 39^3^'9.5 ?81599 ,9-5.9x99 33.9x39 9399 -222 '•x22 a.92442224224 -231 933 142.9 d xa -55.91x4242 9^93.9 42193999313x42.9 ' '48.8 "9•a^' � 92999 39399.932222x22 O _ Q � � � 3 � J � V � Q Z a 4 22222 33999 3293x92 - d 4388 " .593^-39 •aa 493339 ' 439x3 9^939 - 22^ e•222^0222x22xx•a2d -993 9.91 9.9x19 " sgxai -x.R - x 53-3A 893881 5 ",4231x1 Sax 39x3 22 - -222.9•022222x2222 -12 9x3 4a ^`114421 -5a 3i15 x 5x5_44242 233932349 993333.9x999 " "9 e4 raY 3x33399 9993392^9x22222 222x1 349131 ,42x99-5 a ,,,Aa?. 13^51x5 52 921.9 '42 3x39 ^222 ^222x2.14412152112.9 .9 - 1x9 a "931.9e _5 " 42.999331x44 939331x99'22 x91 _9358 . .9x999-5-5 113993x2222222 �p °� £ Q O U W R "1122 99931x.9 32x9^991 - e ee5 " _ - 9.93.0x9993 3999.939x2- ° 153 "?81» i7^OA . 91331x3 x993399 -2x2222 p 22.922 244931x2-513933 a 59.4 . 9a39.5 •` 4x3 19 - e42 "-5139 x22 222222^02222.9222x2 2 391 '9^09x93 e d e tl e- _ NI { " ;842x1 ~ - � IFC 22222 2239x9 9333930 •� •99_1 - e 4,3424 1 5 x933 9x2 4222422^14-524212x2124 _ 9319 _ x1.99-5115 , "x99^93393 333 33.9912x: 5 8 x991993 "921999 222223 22222 -9x2993 399393 _ 554294'615x " .9x93 921 _22222222x22242244224 - 319 x43339.9 d e x2993 - 5 939 x33.9 4242- _ ' 5 9-04? 59 41x999 _ 3x^033 -222223 O W � (L x-922^2. 22x2^299 a ^5- 42.9931911x231 d9 •039 92 -•x•2^22^x22 x•a•22.9222x22215.2 ^a 993 9193 9a d da" 2 - ^33^3 a^_ =d " 9 3x99 99 a '" 15'9 �JJ I a -222 2^92.99222^9x399 'x d x'6.9x399.9 x•293 915 - 15151x1515•' d e _22x222152^24.9 215 991 421 e2 4 93x39955 " '' ° 98+'53'3 95 ^9^993 993 4 -9�Jx5 858 53x4942 _ 9333^9 -x22^229 Z e2 a -',4x9 1 3x993 x99 991 2222215.9 215x -•21515221515221522. 32.9 33^9 „ 932999-53442.9 59 54 _ _ -:4531 -4�d 2999.9 33-51 2 5x839 x:111 - "9x399 -2x15111 Q = 0 9 ^222215222215242229433 °9925.9 ^59.9 _ _a a.c^9 x ,9999194 -.99.999222.9x151542 0 4x22.922154294239333949342955' - 439-.. _'S n=9339 42 x^03.9.9 933 •915 2.9 .9 24222 x22.9•222x222 -• x9.9 ^0933.99.993391.9 ,4 " 488 8888 _ 9 -. 99123 339.9 - 42+9 _ - .4=.15.9. ._. .c 951x342 "4929 93x3 315 291242-5^922x^9222.922.9 2� 391 993.9399.99x9 3- 54�? 2??98 - tlx °5942x11 Q33-51x42 " _ d " 99^2 •9.993 a 4x31 x9119 x15 9 I8.999399222229 W 0 122222^x99993 x e _ d,d.g.9x9 "3^9 •999 •9^a -22^922^9.222^9.22 ax 2^�o x22152222 _^2ya-2 '9^2.9 9x339993 9 " 1?^'•0 '9^'.J5< a 499.2x3 15.9^91.9x9.9 <__d• x29 " 9933399x•291999322.22229^0 222222339493 3939.99 _ _ ass 82.31 a 4 333999993993222222293 22222 393.0.92.9 9993^93 3eb " " t _8^=84 ": 4^9999 ,42 329 32 22•x22.222.9222 2 a ia,9412244x _ 1x3 93939.0 9.99 9 _ � .,•5 1 25.92x.9 x.9.9x99 -- _ 0 -22.22 9^99133 3^2.0999 sd'9 •g .8588 - 49933 9 59 339 '51,5:55, 4.9-541124124 ex244,2�'442244.52 •152 ^922.9 9993 993x3 •2.9.88 . _a 8.99 52= - 939.93 d _ e E 4331 9239399.999215 °41515153.9 x2122 9319 "9•x•093 e - "8^0^5^9 •3 3 ;9933 34 933 2'5 _2.9242242.9p x-14°2.22^9 22^222^x2_22 224 999 9333x9 4-?82 8935 x 9.993 - x x "919 339.93332159 =2.22.234 x22 3991 a x1999•.9 - 2 = _ _xd . 8 _ ;x3999 "499 ^9299152 215.221522 °^x22 -a2.54222 .9-5154 - ^15.9 •9^x9 239 3299932 " 499898 _ 32 „ ,x a5 d x54242 d x 4x55 99^039 33999322 e x22293 j �L s2: _ - Ax A .g, s _ _ _ _� _ .ate a "x _ as - a -- x3.9^9 9x993 x9193394.9 °x22233 CW 152.2^.92 9339 x9999^-�} 3 _3384 8 _ _ _ - " 9 --19.1 239 •159 4^922x22 x•15 - e 22^9222 22^x22`-5 215 ^9^93 33 "^9333.995 dal 929 -_ .c 4 " 9x^93^9 "x31932.92 122299 -215^9x3992 e 5 d•-333.9•a 9 1.532 +9^5_•9 d 39x•0^-•9 992 ^-^9 -22152221^x2 x•15�9 -x222^.9 22222 x^� -152 x33 39 •93•.999x^1 d - x 99x39.9^9 ^`•-Fd "•'� e x e '`9 a'4"`-7•A -9 - 922•-93393 4.9393•x9 4x938 •'-939 d e d a3^99>d^.9x9119^9.99 '239 x2 '2^9222^222222p a 22x22 e - '2^-22244_ 22 2999 =992.939 +` 29^5x1< ' 9 ^a `A A.w.3 9 " 99933 1x99332 -x2229^9 O 22^2^x2993^-99 a - .,e e d x989 =3^9 9 4•x9999^099333.99 2 339 a^- ^9.92.9.9222.9 222•-22 2^922.9 -a2 331 _ ^99 3•-1 a •9 ^5_•5•=888 "•-a•- AR+�g3 .w.=2 9 _ 3.9•099 9339915 °.9.923x9 2222299^09.99•x29319^0•-•9^-3 d-., e e d2 - 11x9313 39x193 39^0 11"' ^9^x221•-22^922^9 -222x22 215•-22.9 •x•- 9399 1.5 e- "•9 ^:F' •'9^5='a ,4.9.91319 339992 ll-j-51-Ml -w2 - - 2 x3991^-13999.92.95555 a - 5=54 209^-19 223 22 222^9.2222.2 -x^2222222 22 2215• -2•- ^931 '- 2x39 4 _ - e ^3 w^92^a^F.G 3 9.0 9 .ia,5 a2x ra 8._3�a 9 a _ " ^93.9x19 "^9x993.9 222 " " 9x999 9922 '22 ^922x222222 44.92442_. 22^922 a 44 9.93 9x3.9 °99949x, ' S -1 3^.',•93881 45 .9x3815 •998.95 1•x9 -- 93192x9 222993 n ' fid! 3 9 2^22223 99493315.9'69333.94242x.9 -35 - e A ;� sd _89849935 'x^ °299 1 ^99x31933.91 229333 -22229 91 43322999 4 - ` "x399•-159 1344294 339 44 2.92°^9x222.9 1215.9.9x1 ^9222^92222 215 399•.9 9x•94.939.9399 ' e 9 8 85 _. "222^29 3x39= 99x3 •' S9 =9x399^= - "4^934 933 2x2 222/5215222 x22 - 152222^9222 2215 339 •993999^011.9 =44 e - X442389 1 _:2.994 .99x9433915152 229993 549.9^033 593 +2' 43334 493 39^09 .92 °.9122^9•x222222°222.9 22222^-22^ a2 9923 99339949 392334^94 9- -< •�•5 _+9 x,+a . •F ''215•'? 393.999423399.932294 =4.93x99 a 6 6 a 8 a ,2229 3x9 a _ d 549^_ 5 d 4339 °•941 999 242 2224222x4-52222215 0 4.9222411141 •029 93^99 99394.0 599x43994 ^3-<a + a.n An wa, _ _ n_ 4�4 4•a + •° 2 _ - 994333999^932x222 293333 � B 22229�����999993x9 a =9.93323 - -x^9394333222222 993339 ^ S 3 2.92x34999 - •� 33339 - 9-883 _ =949 8 '5993 9933 224 44222152-5442-5152 2422x2222^.92 22 -334 33494 4^9x3399 e- _d 422239.922 439999 "=391 59949 54394 3999 -x^-2^1 - '215422242244^9 22442224422 24 2994 3943 _ 443943 42.255 e5 54^3==^ _ s 3?83.39 55 d 9443322224422 3333^09 x - +a a x4445 e- 2333222242244 339993 2222993•-^09 °349994 - 83•'!5 5 ;49x9 -44344 3942 244222^.9 - -422444 "222442224^9222 222 2243 942 _ x3199 153-., " 55+2 « 3--"' _8 "4 42x223992333 443^9399 •?^589 3e "^=.^994 3944.9 _15222441221 924222442224422x - 242 2433 44 x399 -5423 - 9 - 883=4' 3 --x x444354 9 3392224x29443 .9x9443 9443399 -•159•? ^- e 94392- 9415 394422 ° _ 244222422422 ° _2224422244224 22 4439 44 a 9439 e3 xd - F 88,58x5 vaa - d2 434334 33324244422433 499333 L� 2^.9x2239444 - _ _ _ _3.32 ~ ;54^9=24x994 324329 x3.924222422444 x99443 O 42222 •943999 433de2 _5983 8 _ _ _ 5443992 =9434 49324222 e 4224422^.9 244422442244 -42 4338 43 dao 9913 - _ - _ _ _ _ 3 • 24399955 exe "' x51.3 x434344 8 491399 3393222422242 _ - 24222 _424244p2422 442 2399 34994 9994 e 5988= 8898'3=' -^`49433441x9 94x94 339222222224433 x9343.9 '7 '" • " 222.9 39999 - - 39994333994435.9 a 49^~+5= _ .a_5x 4,9941 42 3319^0339 ° 339442224222122 _ _2.9•x15 24142 ° °.9x2421 422 2429 44x999443 94 e ' 54x8 .8993 54.394x994239994 415 x999224424943399 9333x9 a '. a 2212.15 99943 _ _ 3399333^0 54393 3^ 45x934 x44 -41539434999 43224^92242222 _ 442 _244422-9222422 422 43394 3399443 4434955.3^315 e 55 99 _ 19x^5.3 ex9443449^939443333 99944444•x42433494 34^9993 r "2222 ^933943 - 24x44 99923^99 92• �g 4 5^0.9 454249 299411.4 3944399433x9 • 94311515.921 242 4222422442244 -222 99949 944339 -949443399 455 ° � ,x7aa 5^3994x9943394433^9343 99942442222433x^09 33x493 J Q 22222 293499 x999991 2d 8 x - x42339494^- 9439443x4433.393 ^939442 44 '°442242224^94^2 -222 9394 33994 4^943x44 ,55 3 _ _ _ .x9444 994333999999943333222442x4333 393333 � _ _ _ _ ,4 a 4444333 -.sx '4 5555.9 913x499.9.9x99 399439393349933993^399• 3344•.9 -.51 42244222x22242 422 15333 X933^-x 5944.9 •2=^ a 2424 544x4 3999993^9^-^-1x4999994422443319 333194 W Y �. d 22222 31 "94- 5x444 3 94334499999441333322422243313x4333 g O p 22244 9499 . "99.9349 �'• - 5 '^055.9 •'239444x3 413 43 " e 'S 19433399394.9x9 3942 24x422422244224•-24 424 2994 3944 '4x� 45 ' - 5_ 33 x39 x ^94994.14444.994949999.922.9333x443339 ZO 943 433994 e•2.9: •x5545 994x^ ^0 1. 49933993x944391 9322 -415 2x4244424422222 249 993 9944 154 42 = 42 e " �d5aT " 49^ 44x4 4 '99x194^-993x994.9 e 342 44 2424422244222442 44 943 3444.9 ,x 45 •943 ° 4x4 944 d,-. ^-�_ "^'4449493222224x4433.944 0 O > w^x 2.2^9 ^013 393994 ^9 °93^949• •9'd• 49339 3 e904.09939 ' .•� "x39 339 24 4x22442442424•-22 ^22 339 93x495 e2 _ xd 9 3.38834 545,d5 44 i9.9X - F393139x42293333.9943 OU Qpp 2415 9499 - ' °949333 ,d d 2^54 9•'9.3^9 °54349 399 .9999x9 _ ,42-5 3943399 399342442x44224 94 499 31.9x99 °x52 e , d -+38+]59.2 544^0 9434 .9x •! f" 3 ^'4 ",9999922443 x44431 I,L ,aIa�A•a 99-543,.9 444^0 - "' S8_.� .311x _ "=55.5 °424x42 e9 19 - 4 339 39 933993324422449 33 44 149421x25594555 ° 4588348999 ,159 424 4 4x44 Fe `3449324423 943334 12'2,2 4313999 99493.35.9 "9 5x•38^9 ^0x388• _ _ "515 '43949424242 39 342 .9 993 39 1933399339439 44 3 94^04^94259 " e e e 998x•9?9899x1 = 944E9II$$� �d 4549x1335 .9x4392244 3.04433 xa -2 33349944324999413495 a 438839 x4859 e 5y _ 5233949 199 159 x 115 911 931 '6.9x99439 159 3 443.91.25 ' ° a 5a?833•?8,8989 - x442^ 42e 1999__c 9^52 2§49424423x4333 .2 399'6943x4242433194441 99982?a 388.39 _ `•299 99413 9934 49x42 -.:99 315 3x9 399 159 31•'� 39x•29- 4^'F 49'9.9•S ?9a A- d ag ex 44x92 '42 8^31+598x95 4 33139442FW9e94 A .9 U �2ra� 92^923^9= d x49.992432 1x9329 8849 ^4 - 9 984 x42149 3999 x99243^9'49 443 993,2 '_5 424•-~9 1 e $ 23x99 d5 . 9 _ ^a ^398 ^aaa 4 _ _ d _ _ �5 a a^a+2•S48?3x 59499422 33x9.03 Z �,2�2 499x3 In °219888 ^9.758 _ '^^3.58'"-?a.0 'S 4^91 992x4 .9x9923,93 1x9 e - •3'.I+3: •9 •F tl '' _ 4'2 ^=•9 9'9xQ999�a 52.939442933x933 ,g _a - x, " 4.9x2 ° - 999x, 8883.998 9 _ ^« - 1F=.884 9x594342243 x433.9.9 A>9 t9 33949 _ 994 5 2895 ^94^53 8419?-^3 -5941 94413 99 S - d e25 tl-•9 "4 e _ „_A8 a,3 a,h_ _ " 99x,43„-89 -Aa _ _ 9 4 T 8 53.2•°94 95x419942233933^9.9 Ia.J2 99244 3333944 ` ^a 4•'_ ^95^8 8 _•'•38x88 315 4413x9 ,--- =a '� " a " '3 "- " e 7 a - .99 N 4 •=90 '33x'334 =3•-3x4429433.043 4 9" e5 5E /9e4a 539931x4199 x95 _1 923x.9 x9'9943 e 4 " s.�.4A9 _94 835 "4 5 .9x949, _ •y,3,3,5 e a 49883889888 _ 94894.9 5 9349 " •9T,9939 38945 ^=4194224 3x4443 - 2942x.9 4x3394 - 4 ''2 '`''s'° 48 .9 491^9.9: 5 451 _ 39 d � 891 93x4 " '8 5 88 w35 . , c 8'-^^998 894 4 x3133444 443339 � e�eby_ 4399943 3x992^239 •' ^94449 2x954?8 "92 a s'rs '!^2392 . - e e 93'5-';99559.58 - 9 ea' 981 s1 2 99.393 N' � 8' " ea 998 _x99 "x.399451-54 399333 ��4'v"^29 293399 43^99999 e8 x 9^_9848: _ F ---155 s2 _ 5898 =84 - ^588883 422222x42399^9 3399934 " '0 " 455 B,gA A'�F� _ _ _ "aaa •94 - 8 33 5958.9.9?^9•° ' _ 5 59399•-•55^-^594 " _- is-. 9 e - 5 8^938.5 . A ' • 4^g - "+d - _ +3 ^399 °941332^1x° x9433.9 d _ aaa 293839.9•§x989 •958 e e 5 .8 a 8,g? 9 .2 as a 959 a •°931932422 a--IA Aa•',=•9 •3 _ 159 2 5 45 a^5^5^_ F _1118 5 _ ^x99139152449 933.915.9 2a,9_24415214 x42 - 55 a 54 ^'3.9.9942 ~ e a d a -5,a " A " - _ ` ♦44.3•x9895 5a a,4a 3.9122.9 4.22244x3949•-^9 e d = •25 d e 5a e •951 •"aa3 -93i•385 2 53.99 49 _8 155 5 •a - Pa5 a _ 84899 9x9 _ " ' °593x44999242299333.094 9�2^'^4222444224323994935 " 99x4 eae 53893 _ _ ^84984:99995 x a8.e AYa Y 3 A 4.92•.9944223449.91x425 -= 4x9 8938 5 - 55.1 a"3aaa8ra 1 - _ _ - � 5 9^99^=a4 x•989^5.9 •" a « 88•:t!•'33.95 55 I •4'9'P " '98 _4 W Q .�` _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a ^ 298= 5 d,x55 d x ^°«^Ta99.5•S^3'288_155 52- - " 8'5"§'99^92 34.39.5385zs 1^98 u5~1989^9 3 9 .9549 •9 e d 48 "�! 28 d d•-x42�x�44,,�xa9�,0 3224424433349443 H () 3^x3 1 °222x2.929433x992 4 5 _ _ _ _ a 549998ge•5o45 x 15^4 ;4 _ 3c899 a e .-x e .. ' < _ 4 59 _ 281 ..3 4 dS.S,•9�}� ^gffi@I9 X24224133 °x44433 N V � �� a I 8 O - ^2 2 22442294333494E 988 ^39x4 4 , 54,52.9 _x5 4 5389859829934 438914?3839994 5483.9x _ xe a8ca 4 -".911 84P8 5a 554x9 a5a 2 55 5 3 � 81a5a99 22s .922x9 43333.0 u J_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,3 ^5 ,p A 5 "" "5aa-<5 F A _ aa - A+a 1 F •O a 5 " ^95 __ " _ ��._ _ _ _ _ _ - S 2;x22.9 1x213424 3 3 _ 5 302 _ 3 _ -22 d 9359 ! 8 9S _-4 44 _ 1.A ux3 _ _3 5 4 - ` 0a g3 5a8F1 4 5443334422 x438 _ 998x2 911.9.544.9.513 3.9x494 �- () ^2�•_�A _4 -•-2933 • x395 d _8 «^'9^928 5 55Ex " " 55 5 49.3 884 5159198?•99931 x a - x9^9.9 < d _ " _ _ _ e . _ e - e e J •1's114 33933 943x142 5 8589 ae .OA - 354189.4.4 _ tl44 a 115 e e e3 524 42 v e e^9�1p 5^2- _854541x42444425 44^38 8945 •' LL-O Z 1x#_2333.93 443x44 98 53383 . 151 'x= 5 5 8938 « « _ _ _ 2 a e9 2a ' - 94 559~1 °424.9x44.9 2441 x3RF _ _99 4,43.94933321544.224422 d4a333x - w443429 -42.93x1 98 9^58.5 _ 2.931 xe ;455 °.9 42 54^3 ' .84 "344.9154'69x422 ' 2 " 9,52x24'63333114.5411III =433.9x4 a 4.972 d as 899 9.35 54^9 5 _ _98 _ _ _1 4e 55 e,542e 499 494 54,4424.9.94'614244x " - �' S5xa4.9134444-51544-522 12 " W W = 229.0 d e 3339 „. A a a 515•= '455 "4242 4.9x92 " _ F- U --..� j23993 " '� 999.93, 499.9 _ 2 4 x<=14e 2 ^"a 9 _3 _ _ xd ;5 a2 •' 51944.94994.9x24; " 2 444x13399492249224 °423.9154 Q 002••4 -.9x9.0.9 'x443355 33^9^5 9 ^� 48-:8^x^999894 d x4^44^5 -.",5 112.1 d d= 43444 43x44 a "543x49933194455 43x244 444 Q " '4.342442424424242 3x49 3x13^03 `x "xxx"3319'63x452 54 a 4493333 433992 443 ��x 3x3 ° 9443x194 555 e 5499823x19^299 541 „5.ea 22 •-'4 315 94424424294 x14 3.9.9x444 ° -9^52 14443119.91144 °.94x9 a4.93344 .9x9943 133 O � 2•x12 93.9 ^04x499 •F 155 48984^5832.9 4 e � e1 - - 4.39 .9155 4 49x1 93 .999194x42 31 ^�7l443114 9 2 2 4^9.99 . !^9^°•29 4 51.9.99933444x5 ° 4898 _ 1x11492 49.2.2 22229 Li � 2 234 234 de,x52 ° _ _2 �9^a58 •R - _,F �9 .�5ddd . a 5x1 42'242429x42.9 115 4144^9x44 11 4444 4 598 ' wBaAa 9 544499314'631543194 y 413 �W Y v 0^9 2 993 °441 31^09343 d5 d e - _ - a d4„ 9.9 99.9.9x93.9 14 3143= - -4 1411 515 x4.9 _ 59 114911411x4 4 •9 5291 _ 9413 2.2,9443 �j Z 42441 14439933399933 _ 59 e5 d - - « - ^0 ''x" - ,=441 444 x4244424.0.1 115 342 4x143 _ 24 15554 49999 -4398 5e -441193x143 4 884. 53x.9 44.93 422 ••••••���999 _ r _ •9'9 12244 2293x99433144 "" '" •=25'3'31- .`e 5tl4x42a49442 431 154x•-99 151 54944 3 493, 4 - •59^388 •35.99 1 441•x931^9441 1 95x1 5999 -x19 x2-'Ti222 - - a . e - 5x^98 e _ x 9�•3 ^' _ •3x9 1429.9x13.9 _344 •� 441 4 89 544421 ' "3 1144.9 a 5488^9 "8189 5 43143399431 4 991 « 5949 44x•0 x44222 _ O 934222224249933394 -• 5^958 _r . _x s Z 331221444^94423993x ° " e _ 99x8 -34399 2 - LL 3.93222442244429433 - 9Y x 54 ^ _9 553 e94 14 4x9 x•499.9 434294242 •� «429 3344 =2414243 " " ex 4x131 " 13x9^* ^^489 43 x9411933494 4 33AA411.514414943 9 Je4 2,11 8 5 543 94.941x.9 153 . 441°4433 43.9x= 515 "42 _1 .9343144x ' 4114^044.9142^x�.1 1.911 49^3+]9 34893 - _4411933144.9 9 •§981 X88?4 9 24.94242421124x494 3 °2442 a e a4 44.9x9393 154•- 431x433.9 x31 445 «424.9199.9424225441444111429^4.9114143 4 -5488 95.^2 a 13x493319'6435 " 49895.99199944.9x42'634 421 333x2 44/2442943 9993 °943 3 94x4 - 1.1 31194.93 .91 334.93431 1x9 4 _ x31 ° •°•93x399114334431 11x154'6 33144442 " ^^•° -•4942.9 •'314933194145 9 5199 F894 4 • 5449434114941x3 422 314244 214.9.91943 9443199331 344^9 _ - e 44342x 4422443.9 -4942399 39431 42 --441 433 9.9 13111 °4293 ° °.9,x42'69314914'63 1331x4 3^4^95 .9423x1993119415 ' 594 9 x- " ,4x49 2224 5594x14 ° 99 311431x1 °x431424119.9x39933 9.On99 311441 3~099414• 1tltla,1x14331991xx45d - •° -x20'61.9- 9913 421 333.0.9 42223319 '43199 4933 ° x-- - 1114a 1444x499431494.9 2 44.9.91x44 2943 '4� -2 •04433 1141544'64 94^033 443399 34 199.9- "5^3.3 9144299x11 93 311 - "3 'a,F'n7 ;154x•39- 91��- - --934'61 94993 .9x14113• 553.9143319911x45.9 514.9193 '3 =4.93 441 if •09333 24429^9x4 ^9^-33 4222933 9^9399311 23x14 3x44.9e99 3x9 x x 2e _554293.9.999.91x2935 ° e e 5599x13 4.9x9 4333.0 44213331 _4221933 942323319 1x444 4493.29•x•9 343 1 5x9.9 ^°91493344113414•-^03x9 3x9 •9^934^9333 11.9-01.9^911 "=41114 _ till = W 333.04 4124.99914 .92^94x399 32493339 1133.9 x31 4 4 13 43 594424 tl4 e49'63193399aa3 44 33433 ,1 44.4-as%^3-a�333.9 3149 1114445 _ = �x5.1 1111.5e °54211441x192>aa ' °9^19444x3 4931399 214 O O 33x43 A-54419^9344.92x4 214^923991 9333394 3^933194 "4 393.9 -434x9 2 _ _ - 0 1 _1 .54441433941x4933^224^913^04 x 41344^93 3^0^93313 3343344 '= it 142993^99 x3.09 29332339 ^9'39 � 22112 4 122 9443 .9x444,• x• 48884 .9�a44319a425 .943x144 1.993x32222 e1 _ _ _ _ _ _ as - 24.93392433394^ 4? 54394349334254242411'61 x•en 33.4 993.9 _ 3 �j11: 44 _44414 - "2 \ 24 _3 14.21 11.54 51433^-a a 3^ ^398^3 5 4.949493.2x25 e 9 ' '.8 F 4.9'21333 99433124422.0•? U w 3.3x93 32°121134943 " °312 ..fi�gg 1� _124 39 44 2^9493944 ,41943^9^0.9114334'629119. 3x4433 2 2.9 •022122 - 14 43442 98 e • 1{999 1x'1 d 21141•I I1 d tla 9 3. 95x2 e` as ax _ aaa 3334x1 112411 - � 3.9.0.0.9 oxxx11x11394.9 °32^x1 _ _3 a 2^9142391^9 x °9314339^9314413^0 3^933993•- _ _ _ _ _244224744 -4 44 2 4194242142429943442 9 94984 . 58.28..,1 4 - 9 5 ^_111 9 « _ _ _ . x99433 "31244x.5 "4444 e1 J p 33.9.043 "424211.9x111241-5211222x31 e ex ..,/ 4.9 _ x3914.9x144.91x9 , a?848 -•053 .1 4 3 98885 829982`2 549134x4244212 -44-'1.994 (') 31143433441224.94441244224339 .9441.9221x1933421 °21.93x943943343 49339.9344422.1 2•x222 _ _ _1 •7 d ,pa s4.9.9199944x2244 _221443 Q U .a.a A 1 1A.5421-542.5144144349 - x2194121214-5443194.9991x93349 ".9•93x99324424422442242 - -4 \ 224^1 344^93311331141 4 . �4 . 84•"a _c a 21 1 A W Z_ 3 e e42 a 333 e3 22433^0921233493222x2244339434931^93.4 24433344124221^922441442 , (CCCCJJJJJJ 2244 2949334^0431433 x^'98.1 ra59,_ -2 "2 ea =3 e x4298F_ -'!•3^=•9 •' - 59x43432224412 "213 "x a O 3.0.933 °x43332441-544.9.524 - 5 41 ex 244314443994x.9 89 2899.9 1 45555 4 54= 54443332244•-11143.9x43 U 3333.0 33.9943x24422244 A 24299.034.0334^0331444^22422933399.4 244.54422224.9244224.91x44.92411 .J x•221 492244439431 _ '0.9•x _ 3 •54 ^x •"x313312441 24442.04433 3.9443 °x4433.0443324412244249399939933224412444244 39^92242^942244492421441x4.9.2 2A .. 222243144^9 9 _ '1 5^4^3?•3^-58^?^§4 411 `319.9 11111 2 4 4 214x433 O = `� Z •0433.9 333.0^933x433311442141512933444.9.5442.911542-514x444244.9444.5442441144.514411 152 - x4124433 3x42 ° _ 198•g84888?95 455 x 3441441.5.5144342933 p O 3.s.e.0.4 3.043334433443331441'642249344442 A•" 12212224122222•x2244244^2144 } /'2.41 4421811 99^9114 •4 4 54989948899c4 3 _ _ _ x94 33x44442224333.94 �Z p-' •a^� •3x^343 s.a a.4 .aa _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 42 224311 4x1^09342 2 598-n maII82998 e d e '2x11 1342442 -24.933.9 J S 3.3 " 21 334 " eevilee111x2122441A4411 °1x2141241222424424.92112212 _ 33.093 1.043.9.0 ..51..51x43 A A 14 A^- - - -4 A224224^9.524.9AA24^x24A44A22A V- WW 1_ 24434^0 x4933994 " 5 " " ay 8.91449x.9 3.9492Ae433.9.04 •9.0^933 43319.033.0.033x•0.93.9.04421 - 22441141143331x42244214244 O m Z 2 - - 43314 31143.9 " e d 5 2 a aY ^ 441443 9434224 '1x443.9 433.0.9 33^933.0.04.9.9.0.9'9'9'0'0'9 '"•0'9'912144 _ _ _ �1.4433433342433114 Q L_I ' - 29111 113119 15x, e2 55 5 _ 5_51 4594111 .9x99342 °1^131x3 3.9.043 433314334243342 x331A - �14�9 434243193331 'x k =215 91x1194 .x Al 1-9.9 44333 Z U 14333 33.0.9.9.9.9.9 x 33.3.33 .15.0 •0 .4 1J•99lA ^031 W W x 1 43949 5499 1245 - 1 41 _ J = 11 9931.9 42'6 9411342 4 "5 9 1491.3 94314 8 443324 -41x•043 = 33943 9423311 ^0433.0.3 42" 33 4 433.9^0•�•�•0 m /-�g4 4x39^0^9 - 3 9931494 .x1.2112 321 ° •'.9x49422131393 313.04 ; 113.33.0,E 9+931.0193 33 •0.9'x'9'0 ^� I\ 5-x41 a 14411145 44339431 - tl e 94333x49 14 9333941521.04314 '� ' 43314 �3x m AIAx3 1 3^9� e _.0 33943 9� ` v I� W x19999339 1 11131433221411x133 x11 1 Ax L.L �ys'2 .924431x1943144431444 1 1 _2 _ _ _ a x A a xA $ 4214 ^9429921111991394331 1^ 33994442144 .9933x93 ex -2213 e43 " •9.0933 ego " °943 42" �' x422 1244119931114411911 141 d5x 2x5 ° 9131 931124442224 43499344x.9.91 "•933393 44.931 "33 133339 4 O " L� .g 3 - 2^92^944333949224234 139433294.9 ^0439 9x44931 49x4221444244933991324442 °•0933x4 31433 x4.93 x^93.4 \ 0 Q Q W23 4.514411114.5244.921�IIIIAIIIIIIIIIII 193314414 41x42lQIAI x94,1=115 43143114 415.5244154.9-5415.5.9244.5415'611544 31x433 .0.`x.43.1 .g 31 _ J 43. 4 41114441444244419 199931114.9 9 444144 1x411943 43192319 3332A244.9.544.9-5442444.5-5433 °3x9333 3.3sI.4 1^93 {�` J r J 1 $ 3x.0 " , V � vi 4 " 42144214441242294 41993 443993 9'�34441a 31913x42 419442^22421222124414433x4 4331.0.0c O ?> ^�3 e 3 °44411444.52443434 4 19431443 4- ',154 1914 .949424144214411222243 x143 d331443 S 2 � ' A4 d1 3.0044924411 4^-299.93 94424433 94 99.9 43.92•-24424433143.04339443 x99333 C Z 93 39333x44.9.51151299x4 ' 144224411 4332224431434943.993x1333 x44333 qj 4 33x443324^9.914439'64 a 993244^x2943.9 x493142 499x4.5.515333.9423x4233943399 333.04.0 m 3 •0433443.924^922441443 ° ^^3441224424439 d 4'633944 - 4249321-54433x423313342433443 "3x4443 0 `x42 3 13.91 .9 911111.591.3 1a x 491.5144114114x9 " ' °144119394 4244312-5 4443114314134334343 ax4433.9 o Tit33199931942.541.99441441x194221412431944199344339314941.9'6333-5-5113x4243342434233424443 4433x1 I�13 42 34933x42333-512.91439433194424442-549143344144314339933194334_4_442Ax43314314434333x 31x.0.03 c I '93 333.0933x•941-544A14314433244111521443349319214 A52§1 9443111x��2��-^�_3x•0.0 a �+�x 42441221511244244244 1942�. e432211^933424233193393334242333x33342 ' a3 e3 x43.9.Os4xx4 221 e " ,^121244924x12441244.92.24433x9911473 933x9433.99333x44 3�9$�433.9443.9 114$$$•^y^�2 11.92112212221x2 1-5.5A.9.5211.5412124 79 4 43.94433x443.04443 3$l9�3333.9331.01^9-9^9�93�i'•a41.5441124 -24411w x212242.544.12212.1S -5 .9^4.4.8'9 143x14433x433x444 3.943x^03339341924.9 33x42331-5442-514x93 x1419 144114211411422 - 42 3� x•"229^91^9 x1433x9333.04343x ,9.0.9x24^9.9.0431 43 42 1342334243x933342433 33341x1-542.5152.54112142213314^033.944339433433x9433 At 31 4 •043x4 33421,•9133111112.59433933334 7 1 � , 34334 3x444O9p 251 . 03 0 x W Of w 3 W Z l > o cy o O p LL0 a _ _ .. _ FrE ce•EGF' G -- r»rGET • ErT» _ � �•�'�•�• - - a- €. GFG_ &• " »:--rE ETE EE•E•g. _ _ FrFa•cE ' »EET - - e. - - 6•F•E•gr Pr rEE T Er rT ET ETP ETT ETr&•- rGo �'.: F•&'rrg.0 e- .F'E'r E'EE•E•rg' E E TE�re.g.g' rrr >€.irg•r_ iETiEEEP EETF•g. P F = GGc5•r T E rTEr ET " F.ge. E. _ rEP r Er &• Err rErp rTTrET &•-»P F �` - »FEa'"era G J `" ,. P rEE�e ' " ,,. o'o g.g.arir_ rE&E_c_qu EETET t r" rrF-s G ' T P _ GF&s•-vsr@G• ` F.g r g.&.&.g. �. P E �. _�. " -�• �• r TE rEEEEE rETEr�`"» �rE _ F�GFGg�.�� cP �,��' g�'g - "����� R . •�.�.�•r'�•�•���������.�P�.���� MATCH LINE Br E"&`E'E ' rGFGF- r-•ETEET � N »ESTI., re Eg.rr r,a EE•i>g•iP rErr- TEErg._ Fc'FEG_ rGGr x. rTTEET ErTEr G.. - F'e'GyF » " - V TTTErET rr rr &• G•g'g•&'g•g•`a•�.e.g.g•MATCH LINE � ETEPrrEETE� •TGG FY- GGy " - _ P g• r r6E• E G.-FGGGE = Ps' o g• rr EEEETg.g. rE TEE»TEErE EG'F•- " _ EE ETrErrEp E TFFF - p - TTETr -»»Ps'a•» . _ FrGgre #s F_ EETEEEEE r rE EEErErTEEr rr�.• »»gr e: E TFF F_ FGF» PrrrETrErErrrEEr EEErrEErrF.�.rrg.r_ &•&•'e•GrrrE T - - _ _ r r"r r a•-r G•Ga• G•h•seG' '-'e G•Pr G'G'G.' �•G'&'&' G•aG•G'G•G•& g. g.e.g.€.€.' wig.g.i_ rTg.rr rE'sg» _ _ PP rTTr&• -»rE arrrrs - aTE rPEEEPrE &• &•&•&• F•F•&•&'g•rE•E•E•&'E•E'&•r'e. F ..st» g _ »GY5•g GgyFrr&• Tr Ti»Err E TTg'EEr&•i " iig." e r=rEFE GF " FF5'r•G GFFrr -»T &'&•&•&•&^&• Tg•ETr_ iirg•rF.ig.i g.- rTEEEE EETTE»=- #_ tFa TGrr+ P Trr_ - GFG GG-rG ErETrT &.g.E. &• &'&• GTrGTT EEiETT - r 'x FEGFG _ FtEG - _ o Erdg.g.g.e.g.e.Tg.r.&.g.E.EETEETiETac - - - »EFGFT ETEErE E rg.E. g.g. ».. - TE TETTE »rrr FG•" sGu•cE P P �• " »= ' ' GE GGG6•G - e FE sfr iEEEEr" P 9- r, o - - - _.vEGF E E' " G' - -TEEEEP ET @�' &'& E" EEE T'-_'» _ - e. CJ E"airiiri g.r r E T E r T E T T E T E r sG -GFare TEP - GFGFTT 'N -I fTI� E`s•Paiiirg.iri»&•&•»TEST» .&.e - - - EF§ - G" _ cEev v -'-rE•E•E•E� &' &'E` E`» E.E.g.E.g.g._ E »Fit _•5'j-»e• G 's � ... g._ _ FG•GG•E u• r F Pr Pr Pr 6•&•"e•G• .. g•&r&•G&•&'g.g.�&.e. v TI Pa F'F•iirii>irg•Tr TEE Eg' TTETP - _ _&• bGGGG T PN .. _ F.g - " P _ rrrE•r&• E,E• E&•e G EEi E&•' T E'eG5' arccc s ET » G GGFGF G rrE&•_ E&•E•E•E'&•-g•-e.�€. D g && T»&•G T TE TTG FGT GrrG E » Ge & GFe r p g g TT TiTG & & & & & rTE_ EETErT E TeFE 45 TF r T_ & G u = g P &•'s•&•'e& &• Z ETTEie._ g.e-&._ Ge.&•»&•Gr=•- G»`-• FYr.'v" 5�•5'GF G - E&' " e•e Fo•FFFiJ 5' &.&• &•&• &•&•Pr&•.. &&'G&•&•g'» &FG- GGc6E Pr P &' &'&•G•.. G TGYG»Grr '' _ - r W TT'srr TEe _ igig.aa &•&•ETT TErTee FGG_ rr F cpCrz ' & ffg & & uI,IrG.&•Gri. rrG'rrrrF,rrc-��� e € G€ & ITI g.r, iiirirrTETT TTTTT»= - F-rFGr cEcE» P r - - E'' GFGG TT g•EEEE - &• ETE T»&• ErEETE EErTT_ &• GFrG- » TETrETTT- P y e'ecFET _ - TiEEEETrTETT&• y .{ o m »•TETTE_ iE iiir TTE TPre &•�.TTer'"-Gp GFFs'FF ' Fr er°r Pr G Grr it 2.rr•g a• »Gff' &•e•&•&•e'&•G Pr&• &•G G &•&• &•&•&•`e »G&•6• 6•&•&• G 5•&'Pr G s•g sc s= ~gG`s•&'��&'&•G �»'�. & r &•s'GF '•5'>Gs•Pr PsP Gg•Pr g•&•G&•G•&^&• v UI F rr&•&•G•&• g•e.i€.rrTETiT_ ETETp _ _ _ TEFGF _ FTGGGp-sEE€^ ETrEr EEETEEr EE » &•» rr rr Pr EE E _ s,G P _PsGE g,g E,F,gP T FFF , &•FFEg r f o E T T E T T E i r g•ii g.s&•&•E_rr ETrg' - E _ F" ' �• TGFFEG Gere 9a F E_ G --�TTEE 1.re TEEEEEE TEE TE »E TETTETTrETETT _ _ _ _ e Lir TTETTE•F.g.g.iig.g.rTEEETEET i TTT» P rr r�rr '" rrP •g•E•r Trr _ 's» GF5'&• •TGF -.. .rg.TETT.. -` TTS• g.g.riii Tc Fi•GF r F»FYFyTF PG=T " �•TEETE- TTEEET &•&• TE »r »TTE_t-E_ TETTrT» r-rE rTEri &•' r -'.-•" � »_ FFGarG 'F'&•&•F•F•G rrT Eiiii€• a € G€€ !o '� F•F'F•F•s•F•T F•E rE rig•r T E L_U_ TTErTr T» _ _ _ _ _ G. G »Trr rTTT TETE» &•&• &•&• & &' TETEETEETTETTTE»' r " z-�--r TEETEET 5-_ c--P ' Gr eG'sG G _ E- a P EETTTE" E : TTE &•_ _ _ _ F•EETETTTg.riiig'g•i TrT E T EET T ETE BETE" :" rs'GFE•E" _ F FEGF_ G _ P -a _ c - =»TET s P -TESTY EEG ETE &'&•&• TEr &•&• EETPrTr &-TT'u r E y • , &' " »P _ •^ ^• = G E' FEEFE a• G rTTTE- rg•E &•g•_ _ ='� o TETTTT TTi iriirrr TTETTrTEET g'ET Gag _ - F5.6"s F@ ~ - G•gg - F•Gi&•F•'s'Pr&' &'G- >s• &'`s• Pr &•&• F•&•&• &•&• e•Gg•&•F•G G's•g• "x• er s•_G- I• ePr gr -»»'•F•g•G•&•g•&'H•F•F• " g. -r7 TTTTET ETriisEirErTTrTTiTrTTT •TT&•_ - _ _ v- EFG 5•G - G GG•TTErEEr G" --TE T&• &'&• &• &•&• TrTTTT TEETr Te'" - -EF FG G&•€• T»-" •TTErTE'- 'TETE»&• Tg'E D ETTETT TEii>€.ii Eg.ii ET Eri»&•PrP Tg•TTTTp - -G GTTTTEEETE TE EET rT &•&•» ETTT _ - TTTETE G Fr GFFF » T Trr-at-Trr»€ T GFyF r P Ti ETEET rTrEE fig.g.€e.€. .�+ 5 TTETET ETTig•rig'rriiT ETES&•' Tr ETF•c y' - - _ _�.=.Pr&'F•6•&'&•'e'&'&•€r&•g•G G'G-•=F•Pr e•&•&• F•&• Pr&'&•&•&• 'e•&•g•» _ g•er G•-� �€+p= rF• =Fae t &•s`•'e' g'F•F•&'&•g'&'F•-- . es s•nGFG G•G• a'g•Pr&'F'F•Ps• G•`r's•&•&•G �. ETTETT- TETTri Eriii&.ETETTG TEErT� eu k`G= `r" F = »P ' G'r GFFGG riEEi ETr TTr TTTET» i Tr•'Fr EEETTT_ rrig•€- '" 'a•F•F•G• 'a•F•FF'g-€.>g.g.g.gg•&•&'&•PeG=» - &'F•r' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'e&'F•&'F•g•G'&•F' Ps•6'&'F'r&•G&• G•&•&•&• &•&• &•Ps F•F•'s& &'&`_»» - rF` eee� a TET- s•sFFs" _ - » " -»�-g•G• G&•&•&•e"r a•G•H- &•&•&•&• &'&• g•&• F•» F•F•&• G &•&•F•»»E &•_ Cr FF- &•&•G•F'S•r''" P aG&'Pr&•F•F•&'e: " GG•Ge✓ Pr G'G.. _ •F'F'`e•&'&'&^&'s&'&•& Ps&•_ g.g.€.G€.&. ILITETTETEiTETTrri_ _ _ _ TErTT- ° o- rTi 5- TTTrr rr EErT TEi- iT &•&• TETg TTg t 2 GFGF iEr TEP eETT TETT»Pr x 7»»TTTg•EE rT re rE T TTr&_ EEsiii m e.rrrii ETTEETT.. TTT-_ »G-FE=- _ F _ -•~s aTG P e.g. &•&•&• ETTET" TE» � ,. y" -GGG ETTEEr GF•G'&'F•& rrTg»_ TEETTTET rr rr EE iiiii TTETTETTF•TEF'_ - - - #_ rr=•E"r P ' rEEi 9.P. TP •G'E.E.F_ • g•&•&• G&•&• �� &&•&• &•F•g'&•F•G&• G&•&•F•= f Fe r6•GF'r ei ' F•g•&'&•Pr& Pr Pr V_2. F'-»» =g'&•F' &•&•&•P.r Pr&•g• e.€,g.g.g. TETTETETTTTTTi Eii Eii Er Eg'TT-" s ETT»" s r9FT.Ffi•c' _ _ y'r re FEci P » TTEET E. re r•'s•g' EEr rT _ E. rr&.ii a G F•"s F•F•F•G Frla,r•F'&Ell•g g.&g•G&'&•E g'rr k rr G&• &'§" Prrc-EF6•g•5•G _ _- - r &•G-s'Fsr es " g•F•G&-rr rr . G•Gg•&• Pr&•&• &•&' g•g• &• F•a ar Ill g•ff•F• _ P r Fi. c've�' 'r- F'r g•g'F•F'&'&• r rr g•E.G g'&F'rF•»»G• 's P�-'P ~ � &'F•F•&• &•Gg•&'&'&•- TETTET TT ET T rr i r g•g•g•g•&'&•&•g•F•S•rg'T - " »p G FPrFG GG. _ _ e. it &• EE T E T Tr ETETa T TT ' =GFT" _ Er&' ETT. PTTT TT rir rr P. » "GTF - TTiEE ETTTr TE ETTTTE TETTE"a TriiiiiriEETEETTET E» PrrF eFa'G ys•FFF s SGGp Fi P"&'r��= - gErE &•&'&• Tg•_ ii &• ETETF•r6•&•F-G•»e F'@e✓e• s ceF'g•Pr&•Ps'Pr r --•GS•&•&•&g•r g•g'&•&'&•» Pa- •.rrGs6' . g•F•zg•&•5'r rF•F•g•e•r ETT' TTET T E T T i iiiriri TEr TE ESTE&•&• P TTG-r GoG•r GGF FGFFf•"r GGeF ETT rr F•g•&• ETrT rr ig' &• Er TTT gTTsuP ep G•rP P - P»TTr TEg'TTEi ' rr TTTi ETETTEE . ETTTrP -TTrT €.i ig•r F•F•F• a" -»TTTrTTETTETTEETEETEErETTrGu FFFr" " TTEEE TEEr TTTF•TE ETTTF•F•EEi=•iiirir&'i TETT TEr TT G EF- 5•G" �'GYGG __ _ G - _ sg. g. P P P _ _ -ee• »"rG- »»-&'Prg•g-'s•g'g^g•e•R.F•g•g'F'g'g F•g'.&•F•rG mer aF�'rF `a g•g•g'F• F•g•g• €.g.g.g.g. . TETTET ETTETTTTTig.ir=-i�&��gTTEEEErr rTgr» _ rh' �?,G»r r t#FgG ucE» _ TET �TTEt-2-E r rr iT &• ETTPs&• r - ge,G.-re EEEiiEEEETrEEg » FFGFr • E• - »rTET TrE iriii ETTTTE TEETE'sTE"s riiiri_ _ _ _ _ g•rr&•rg•g'Pr -'�'y lig - FGE'F- •y g F•F•G•r F•&•F•F• &•r g•g• g•r&' F•G F•&•'s• P G ='er >sss- F'Pr&•"s F' F•r G'F'S•r F•e•&•F•Ps•g'r= » G6.5-•_•• " grF•F'g• P GFg•r&•r g•s€.g. 3 13>` r s `s's•"e•F•'s'a'a-`sF•g•g•g•sg.g.g.g.r g•rg•g•rr&•Pr e• G'E• PTF v=veG - 'r F•r F•G•&'24' -»F•r F•Pr &•r g•g Ps•&•r r'• 'sGrc G r� r & " - _ _ F•g•e&•r&•g•�•€•g' ETTETE "s E`sTETTEE`siiiiiiiiiirrrTEE �.- •f &•TFT Erss='Tr E&•F•- _ _ TTTE TiTETTTGE» ` � •TE» »G •IG ^»ETP =r EEEEEEETGrPs rr GFGG' r- - v "rLJ TE'#F'&•`a• `.F, raF•F•a•"#TE g•g.g'g.g.g.g.g.g.g.g.g•er&•r �uG, c'r" ' _ PteP�.. _ _ - ^&'&•G F•&6'g•g'r&•r&'F•r "x• SFYrPr 5• s - g'&•F•l r r F•g•g•E•rrg•g•g.>g. egg »�»TTS EE'e• g.g. ii E&•E &•"s rTTTEr&• • rGGG» P S ,D 's"s ETE F• r l rFr,1s•F'E•&•`s•g'g•g•g•ri In Eg'r riE E Gg _ GF-cG Ps ETT GTTTEEr ETTrTG G• tGFG GGs' T rrEg'ETTEETTg•EErg•iii&• _ »GTE " &'� #Er -F' . TEii ETi_ EirET ErG- TTg•TTTT G'FpF E - E -TTS» »riErErE•F•E'&•G'E' 'c F-Ep -Gr» P »TTir r i E T T E T T E T rg•g•g•r, ,gyp "d TETTE"s sTETTETTiiiiig.ig.rEiriiT ETTTTGP _ _ _ Pgg -rTTETT iTET TT_ EiiiTE TTTE TETEErTFT _ - .E•SFG y ' �iEEG Tg•TTETEEEiEE-»' EE§'p EiT_ G a-rETTrTrETTEg'Er Eiii - ri @ xi ETTETEP TF•TEF•F'rg.€r i g.T r g.g.irig'i _ Er ETEr »JE• 's g cse=Fi zGE'&• =•g'&•6•E'- g'g'E•E• " rg. g.g•r&•r F•E'&•r E•F•E•E•F•6•E'&•» _ _ _ TETTET E"s Er Tig.rg'iiiiiiiriiii TE TTE ddE• ra E�nGi G rG- E T- GGa TTEET_ - TETrTE Ti iig.rP Pr ETE - o frrr » €rTETEr TTET EETEEEE TTT»_ `Yi g iTT&• Eriii " C] ETTETT` TEriii ri g.g.i r g•r i i g.i g.r EET ET"s_ re _ - - m g.�.e.Ge.� e.eg.e.G.� TETT ='» EGy'#pGT >gE' .. E•Fei GF -&rr*&•F'G&• a•g•E.C.rr `rr_ rr�•�• r&• &•&•E'r&•&•&•r&•E•g•&'Prg 'rFGFG E5'#G G G• F•F•g•G'Pr'e'G• E•E &•6•E'&•Pe•eF'F•15-&reG"s"r- PE• `c'F'F'g•g•Pr F•Po - F•F•Ps'E' &gig. m TTE"s ET 's"aiiiii- _ _ _ _ _ i_ - _ _ _ _ g•F'F•E-F'&'r F•e•E•E'r F•F•o G- g'g'g•g`g' .3 >cg g•�r-ii iiiiEirrri rEiTT- GYFr rFGE-G• EFGGG Gr _ ' TF•Ei TTi TEST TT Fr Eii iE rrrrF•&•r TEETTr- &TEGerEE TTGe » P P TiTTr TTT ET»T&E re E E•E re E E T r"s E_ p g.ET�rT T TTr TEES» E ETTET Ei iri rr TE T r T E T T E r E E T G•P T PrsGFT GTG_ €• P -T E"sTPe"sT` iiiiiiiig.iiiiiriiii E rE p•Ge F"e'GGFG T -erg -rr iiE ii TrT r T T r E T E ET re T» - GG GG"s'G s F•Ps E•&•g•g.E'g•E'r r E GTEr EE EE ,11 le = » F EEETTiT PTGrTTi W C'] e.e.E, g.e.e.g•r e.g.g.e.G 2,G.r E gF, GF®�jr •gu'G .Ji , r4.5•FGGg GGr55•_ DG_ F•E•F'r &•rrg•rr&' &•rr q_ r r E'r&•&•E'r r E•r E• r :G GGFE• ., s's•r&•rr FrF'F•F'E'F•F•E'F•rGF•rF•F•g'F•e•E'E'F•F•G» "'F•g'6'6'r -F•&E•r r g•gg.E'% Z Z TE'sTE`s _ _ _ _ P ^•s _ GF'r Gr G3 GGTss E &' TET TETTET ET T_ i Ei i' G' r 9 ET T E•TT_ 9- El ETTETTiirri TET&• 4P .G-G r FF- - 7c EG _ EETEETEETTET " &' Ei iE TT»TTETTEE T'_'G EF rTiE »Trr rr Fr -r ET i E Ili-»E. - "r gG^:•FF - - rF•g•g'E•P�g' Ps G r Pe•E•rrr g1 g.g•g• o C-' o TETTE€.- iErEiTTTETEETEETEErTET _ G,y�,_,E� rr " &' Ge5•Yr - - 'a`a•EErEETTiTEEEEE r TE rr g-r E TTTg» P•T E _ G G»&-TErTG»` "-TE _ - EiT&TTTT»" rGr �'G&GE y " TTTE•EEE EETTTT�g•g•gg•g -I oeF•rE.F. .grg.�rrrE•E•g•&'g•E•E'E'&•rrrE•E'rg•&'Pr _ 'E' _ _ _ »e•-&•GF'_' _ _ " "a& &•&•&•r g. Cn 0 TE`s E Ti_ iii T Pr Ill E r T G•T rE'E•E•G•Ps-r GF •-•co err ti• G"e6G"s " 'v »Pare&E'E•&•r F• g•&•&•F•Pr r&� &•r &•r g•E•6•F• •F•g•Pr E•&&• P- -.G'o•»G s rF• r c g•E•E•F•F'&•_ E•'e 5•Fes"a' D O 'GT Tg G » -FGG -s•TJ 'a »»ETT § -rrE TET &•&• irETT ETET's irg'E'E'g' -I frl� ETT'e Ei_ iii EE ETT - EP ETTTT- 's E#ttEGr� _ x, P E EFGr- E-e• # EEEET - T T ET &•&• ETTe• TE•E-F•G a P cu'a'' » o p E•�F• rE•�g•&E'er G- sG.S»• G g'Gr _ F ia'EE• P€r-gG"e'F•g•E''ePs'r Pee E'&•'sar g.g.>g.g.°• D Z TE T T r U_ ii r TEg'T» P iiEE TTg: GG FGGGF s - ,,. P P TEETET- &• » TT TT E4 9. TTTT - g.e.e.i meg' Z7 Z o EPs TE•ii_ irT TETTP G TEETTT r Ec•GrSG Ge_ 'r»» -- - T "s " E G" E&' EEr EET T E TT TE iE- F »EET» PsTTi ETT ETTEET rr zre.rcccr• 5•FG " rPs•E'E•g•PY `aE•EEE g.gg='9.i W gir_ ii TTE Tr- Eg.gg.gP -P ' 's-s'-eGG5' GFaG `�= G»"r ` I _ _ _ _ ro TTS_ e. ' TrErE &• ET rr TT TETET G_ GraFT P -^�sg'6'E'E'E'E•g•E' g• E'g•E'E•F•F• a,. a se'e 5•'^ G &'r E'F•P Pr E•r& E'g•g•g.g.e. C TrT iiEiii EErg'T- TTEr" - GFgc -FEET ss»'t»»»G»"r» P _ g.5- E-Er V ET ETTETE TT_ rTr ETPa_ » EF_ aF6a g " �• TTEEEr EEE TETE•»F E. _ FGF"s _ 91 frl TEEEiiiiETErEETs EETETT G9 GGFGG G•Pr»='sG=Ps»»P _ - C� G EG F`cE'rF T • -grr & »FSG 'G gg.g "eETTE TETPe " PEIT» & r ET1-G&•r rEe TrT»» _ E§Fr GG5rr_ » r g.2. »gy sTEE'E TE&TTE-E-* C7 0 R1 EPeT>Eiig.i_ TTiig•E ErF-ff'r' _ - - - _ (n - .=_G Grg•FG EF•s eco-PTT-`-.' FtrF N r T ET riiiiirTTTTEE EEEET r»GFG" E' G r 'ETTrTg r e9. 9. G#Y•Fr •\ ETE P ESTE &• T&• TT E. E Pe•E'E•F'&-F•»P 'r G=FF fr'sg-v •�' ' F' Pr Gs•'e" PrGF•e»»»p p rr 2r e'GG a& x'Gg•'e•F' " &•g•E•rag•€.€.g.a T9-rr El lll.&l TTET TrET_ GEGGe » s »TrTT.. G E.FFG GFGGG EEETTErTE T TTE TE EETEEErEEETTTTE' GGGGE 's ar= g.g.g.TTET r tPP _ag _ TEEriEEa_ . rGETE riM :TE ZJ EEeiii- iiiTTGrF-E•GrE• e'g•r-»y aFa'FF g F•F•Grle E'_ 'u•G5G c-z'F-s•rr r&'GF•g•F•E•rrr&•rrPi&• F•&•r &•r &•rr&•rrre•E•E'E•F• s GG - F•&•E'E'g•E•6•� rE.E'E•F•& g.g.g.g.g.€. ETiiii_ iriTTETTETEE&• . TT» g,&, x.P P TETE» T' er Gr EFeG» P »TTETEE rrr&•rrr"e• r EET ET ' TT r r&•E•E•EE G» i- "sYeGE sEEi EEEE #T P'64 s (n o srrg•=•P_ g.rTTETrEETETrEE - t"s rTTTT_ »F- Gg.G raGGTr »EiTEEiEEErEETT rT ETE TTE T»»TEST ETg F FaEe' g»TTETTE ETT- - T sP 'E»."-. .T ' •E ET g•g•r`e•r&• iiig•ig^ STI i- iTETET T r rr E EEEET ETp P P » g P - EiEETP @ FE'rrE TGsTE P - EE EiEE EE TETT TT TEETTT ETPYT» 4G =gT- a »' p�"a•re&rTE g.ETTTT 'asPc •6•GFF g g " G»-&'F•g•F•F'g•E•E•E''er&•&•r&•�_ &e.€. �.g. -T1 ETriEE i rr EPrTr ETTTi Ei ETTtP E - FGG» TrTE EETg• TT rrrr Er illg. F. --- TrrTi G`^eP E• •» =Gr•rG » -- a rg'EEETTEETTi11 iig•ii TPsiiiiirTETTT TErErGP »ETF T aG» TEETE sE » rr _ TE - g, P FGFG '-FEE »TTErETE =TT ErrTEr»E &•&• g'ET" TEST» e iriir ETri_ i_ ETEE_ P " PP - -». '. G ^ " . �' TrETer »T GFrr- FiE• ,ere =ETETErT_ - s ' = _.=_.g.� � TEG : -"aTTTTET E EETTETTT Tr iTE ETT»_ P " e' T"airiiiTEEEE TEETG_ - GFF GFGra »-r- _ F. TTETT G ET ETT» Er T- P »P » »TEE» - •^ E- b•Grr•FG --Gi 'ETiT TEEET_ F• Fr III Tiiiii E E r E» t P rTEr» FFE GFyF» G P "c= 'a'PaGrEPs•rEg'E•F•E'&'F'g'G'»c ' G' r6•EE• _ E•r 'arE• &•E' E E•F• Pr S'E'E " »G'» x'P*G`e'G G'P F'F'r EG' P 'u'r ei• F€rEit FFrFr °r> Eg'E•G ' c•Es•E`srE @g•e•g•g• T'ri TTEET ETTT» - -Z rr Gr TTTi ET�TT"s Pe• E•P _ e TTTTT 1- r Tr .. Ti ETPs''•» E F==eF- 'F`E r Ez^ 6•v "-G FF'F-•gFP � - e--s' r �EPae•&' g•g. _•& T Eg_&ll it•tt •TTTETT sTT ET TT r Trr TTTET F,y, g.EgFGr _ _ EsFa _ s s' ibTETTTETE @E =•�,•'-Ep •r E•EEE'Trrg• GTTErr "irTTT ETEETT _ GFFF - m'E'gs»ETTETT eErE' "rr _ r - ' _ tre TEG ErTEE _•GGr_ _ g. ig•r TETrP TE rTTTrTE ETT» zsP � _TTag.g.g. - TETE _ _ e. tGF�r Y »"a=cGT TET TE TEE TTE e FGYGE gTTTT- ETrETT - T E g g.r iGg.g.r g_g.r- TT - - _ " r g=-5'F �GrT •E g•g•EEarg.g. g.g.€.g.g. e.g.g.0- 13-g•r TTETEETGr GppT s tTEiTTrE TrTEErT _ ` T- 6'FGerP G`s G•rT rG•.• Tr Tg•TTiEE TEE TT ' TTErTEE EETGT»asG F GF GGGGra' g•T@»»T c r GrF= r 'g'ETTT riT»Err_ 91 _ - _ _ _ r-G6- FFFFG . '-'TTEETEiTE ETE E &•_ g•g• iiET TEETETET rTTT--- GFgE - F= .� _ r g 's•F•g'i>iiiiiiEiriTTTETETE-G TEG s ='TTTETTE ETEEETE - GfrGT GFETg r g• rTrTT &•�� T r��'•' .i iii ETEEEr= ETT» TFr••GeT G - G-- aEge. #6r r,.-y.r� -Pr^Ps'EEer�&'r&•E.'a•r&e.g•-,. g.'=.€.rE I g.riiiiiiETTETTTEe•aer s _ »Tr Tr Ti q.Ill ETEEEEE TT E e' T, ', i- e.g.r&• TTErTr" _ TTETG» " 5'TFFG-s FF_ _ ^„ a _ _ TTi iii` gi ErE'g'&' _" �, --•GTT TTT i ET P E•r TT T_ GF•ifi• GFGEE E' P eLA g:e:� rg• TiiT rrr ET. TETT Eg'F=G6- = E_ - �'GG GEc•F GTi =TTi EErrT ET iii iii iiiET _ FGEea 5•G-TF•c iTG E EYE_ g. g.g. Pe. ^^Y_•• :. :. eGG F G •»�»G„-a•GFT aTTir" g.g.ag.ig. iE F•"e•T g - siiTET&• &• - »»TTEFFETiT EE - - _ _ _ _ Ps--sTTTP - TETTET ii _ E_ i T »ETT- TETT' Pr» GrEF '�_ _ - a F - _ _ a iiig.€.ig.i .e.iTEF• Tiiiir- rE"a TETE ETEETT a 'el rs '� E•GE re rr ET ETEEEE ' TTErTT irPi iE_ &•iiT rT iTT»_ P &'&• TTEa_ " - , 9. ii g.Ee TTEETi TETTTGG - y 'T rerP 's Err T&i'G Tr TTETE EF •G^sGG -•G - TF:F•TTT° gg.,�a�g._ r€•g• g•g•&'&' EE'F'G•PrTTG g' Eg•E&•T'^» €''r _ > • E." - y' =•F• - G"F- G e'GFie• »EF'g'T a•F•E Er TTTT TTEE•.TG r° - •GGTg .P -&.rg.r.rr P P F.g.rr E.gEE r gTF=' y' #_ F` g`TPr T ET»' €.r ii iii g•TT »TETT TTr EET T R.re T-a a`sG Tri' FF = f, .g.g.g. g.ig.ig.g.i iil F • •r i•FG-r r ='TTE"e TT T TT r Ere EETTr_ TE EEr_ r& iii g•g,_ iiTE EETTET EE TTEETg'TTr Eg'-Gg_ rFGFEg TTT E' F- "e -. rTT TT g- e.e.�.g•i€.€.g.�.�.g.TTT e•iiiii rETi G" ETPrT T.P--. _ FGGF T »TT�'e TrrTEP _ _ »SETTEE»• T"Pe•TT TTT Eiiiii TELT TTTTP x E _ -e.ra_ G EriES" _ ETEEiS TTTE TET iii g e•ig._ g•ii TETE ETTTTTTETTESSg'TTTrT-:» E»FGYgr • TEG G J . c � ' ; ag•g•g.g,g.€.g.a.i EF•T`p's• g'iiiii »SEE F g•TEEi G GE•rG E_ E=" r- •G'F'E'E E•EE&• rrg• fig• C'`-r.4'+g.g.g•i iig. &•E•r Eg•E&•TF'G'T EEEE'g'E re TE»»'r CTP E':•FS•&• G€rr" G •ra• o- - i+'='F ri »EET TTTTP - T 'x•G=G » G " GSa'E ESTEETP _ _ ieFTE Ger GG gG 6' "yG5'aa- - ` GTS&Tir g•iiiii>g.iiii E`e•`s - F a'GGG- i G• »F•E'G. _ g'i» r giE 's -»rETSE TTrETETEr TT Tii i �•7Biiiir ii rTEEETTT-_ "TTTTG»'r &- _ - e, g.g.€.g.g.g-i g.g.g. aiiii_ TTET _ _ eT G'ETGa ESTE a ETrF S» P ^g T ETETTrTE TTS&•&•&•&• iiT ig• ®iiiii_ iiE rTE TE» ii' •TE T.»-'-. €'r _ TGE'» - G 6F rG ' EFF Tg•EE - - s'F'F' -iPisi TETTT=•_ _ sTTG g r - TF EST& » E - ' •+ _ g• giiiiii_ TT TEE ET r TT iETTTa - r'z' - G v's•'s •-e• 6's v4• v g'i TT r,z,i g•g•g.Pg•g•i' iig•g•'sG g.�g.g.g. TETTTESTEET= E'aG5•T GrGr E•' »-Trr TE- Tcl iP, TTT»» e' Garp " pTrr EErTpTTErEsT&•_ i&i_ &_ i g•g•g'g•e' ii- TEST ST _ SiTSTT Ps P .- G irg•g•iiP g•Pii>s g.g._ sTSTETTETTTTTT» " E - FF »GFT Trz 'EESiTTTTa» T ipFEFF z•FSG ErTT E'&•rr&•_ ii_ _ & _ s.g_ i g.g. TEST T=' TTT6• rTE iiig•iig CIE _ _ _ _ rr _ e. e. &'rT »ET's TEiF•g'» y'sa -»G•ii - g.-g.>�_ iTTTESEESETTTT- wG- .'FT» G P -Gsrr aST TiE�T-=Ec T eG'GGSGr Gr-Gg TTrST rT rr &fig. ii- - e.g. i TTE TTST_ ,, T - F-g =^" rra TTEETT Sii€._ iiii Pi D ® e g ETTESr TG FrG - TTTT ies gTETSEEST TETT eJii_ _ _ _ _ _ _ rGrs _ g P g T gGG ar G TTTTTTTErTTTT& & �, ii Eigi r&_ _ _ _ _ Tp&•Err - sr" " F,&.g.g.rg. r T rr 5•»G FGFt »ESTTTTTE TTEE Tig- iii�iiii it irrr EE rST TTTTTTP - =G FG F» G aTTi EESSSTEESTTTT_ Eg-g•g•ig• riEiii- ErSTEsEri ' TT- Tr rE g» g i� iii ei_ s i rr rr rr rr ETTETg EGG rE _ gG' rTTSF�T - � E rr „Gi • GTFG F STTETTP " TrET Ge:F- GFT # GG»E•GPtE � GG-taTG ' =TTi ' riTTEESTTiiiiii . 0iiiii_ ETETTTE` zTTETT»P ``' s rTTETS P 'r •e r- _ _ PSTTT PTTTTETEiiiiiiiiiii_ iii_ TTE TrSEEE ETES- - FSrG GrrT :g»»» _ Fr _ GFFTiry'" -e' iE ETTTETrTTTiiiii QJri�•>i_ iTETESi TETTTTTr Pr STrT Gr ' GGp _ _ _ PrTT .. 'pT TTi- ii- iriiiiii ii iTE TESEETESE T- - � _ - "a Sr '2FFGe• -»E»_G r G`a'- «-•yig 'G rSrirT&•" P EgTTTEErT��iii g.g.e.i_ rrTEErS TTTESTTG G c T - - 'vEg ST TE TTr Ei iiiiiiii_ ii rrr ESESTErTESET --_ Fo »TTTETT_ D C - TG TG gTF »-» TT E& TTi ii iaiii i_ ri_ iTrT TiETiEEESTETTTG Ecyx - .• EE FGF =.iiii_ iTTSTTT - rTT-` •G - _ e•GGF _ _ _ - ag=-» _ N ' 'r- _ - Ti E6'ET» " 'a a'iig•g•g• i rr TP rET� •G e' _=GFGS•P a_TTr t e• yc- _ r- PrP,. TEG- aTTs Eri_ ri_ iiiiiii ii rr V. iTTTE - GF_ 6'Gy'G _-_- _ E, .r>F• TTTEEGs' ^tTEE rriiii C/) g.g•Ee•g.g &TEE-TG = &•G" PG "s FFS'_ 5• rr ^»�'a . .&.r. .. p = - » EG •r TE r&•&•_ g•g.' ig•ig•rg•ig• g•g. rr re re"sP - rr PTE •r»'r •E GE•'r Gg G 6'4rJ rr aNs r EYr GG`u'&'g•6'G »&•EE• rrg.&•i g. g. mig.ig.g.g._ g.g.g.aTTS .` r D r$igiiE_ iT� TT» TT T= rGrGo- T F & = F _ =e= TTT rTSi TTT �m gi _ ii_ i_ _ iTE TTP TEETiETs- g § E EGGE> E G " gT»' 5 Es _ EEE r ESS rr" o r iiiii_ iEpEST- TT» # TrFF 6EEFE E_ E Pra - FT ' TTESTEEiETTTEE E aTo Fs a- TTT TTiEE' Tiii� '= G r _ iii=i_ rTESrTG- PO - GrrP "r TGFG FrSF- IG »=» ' ^E' G._. G iiiiiig• ii TET ErP ETi EST » E- - eGF- »T g " C - f g.a g. _ ' T i -»G €' E=FFe y'FGT GIG »-P'»_ r T� Er5'TT i1 » SiT SSE ETEEE ETT_ g.e.= ig.g.aG'iig• ii TTT TT=• ETiTST� = =F5'F' " T_ T pt^ P x »» •V T "rg=•&TEE•E'm Tiii=• Tpip P a _ TsETTTe - Pa rr•vFg -»FGT IG 'sG»P'»G»» &' 'GTGG •G_ " TET-- -•5'T"cG rx•`raG•`^ »»c- E'GTPs'p PrrEE'Gr s rr iraP aGe.' Tiips>riErEE-rE&•E Br&•PtT * _ - - - g,_ e,»c»E G • aFS'F'r a'Cr x' PE'rEE•Pa EE'&•T a• Tii ii g•g•g•g•g'ig•iig•i g•rrrE�&•E E&'Per•g'Pr�•PsrE'- -• Ps•rF•TF'TrTF'EE•TrE&'_ _ _ Cn EiiiiirETTTSTETiiETS» r Tt' er#» _ »'a»»"s g'rGgGr �'-s"aFT G4GET GTiESTrT EEETEpTii ii Eiiiiri_ ii ii .TTTTTT» 'r g'¢=GF- ='&'`a• r -'c--»'r_ ` -E&'r F'F•E--F•rrg•F•r E'E•g.g.a=. CT7 dEai>g•i'=g'i&•ErTEE•EE`s•Er» - Fw E - g•g•i�•g-i g•g•ig•g• g•i g•i&• i _ rg r Pr-='`-»'G».P-`aE Cr'rG» cF'rGPY ' EF''s'r Pe'E'G'T F•E•EE r&•i_ _ _ P TrTrEG- GGGr-a g'g Ps -»Pscce•G':r E' ' &'&'g'E&'&'='g•i='=' n w u a m w �Sg'iPi ig'Sr TTTTESTTTTT- c _ G•_ -»g Ey'GF FFGGT 'TTEETTP TiE &•&•&_ g.g- me. rg.g.a. gi g•e.� Srr ESETTTT- sEp Yy'?- •=YE -isTT' i errGG e•--P^`•P ` P PP ,&•P " Px•E•E&• e•Pi�'e• F•SiiiiP_ iiiT r T T ETr ET P _ . .s E TF -ySTT.. r.Or T'_ ET TT_ _ _ _ - R- -' " &•&•ti Px• i- Pr E'g•TEEr s P F•Ps•E&• 'e•STrg•i"_ ErrrTTEETTSP =TS-=GT-_ P &` - Nr_ PE rTT» _ rTrEETT -T TEr_ iii_ iiiiPiii_ ii iTT ErTrTETTTi» rrFy'G Gu Ers ra _ S ETEET ` # TTTT ai=•a=. STF•Pg'i"_ ii Ei TTETTT' TTTTTT- » � G•ErT »E _ 'r» &TEE» E• E&•r ig. i'•g.g'i=�•ig.g•ig•ii&•E EEErr EE•Eg'Gr P yFd'FF'i 5'S'S'G _ GT' c TF•Sg•ii' EEg•E'= TTTiEF-F•_ _ Pric7•EP r5'F3cF E g• -'r&'�'E Pr G' TErr_ ig. ig•g.i'=•g•ig._ g-g•_ irF• E•F•EEEE rrGGFG€r F"a•Fc EP . Pr •E P µ E'F•E• 'u' EEETEG " Pr Pr E•rr ESTEai' aie•iTT»ETP - TrTTTrT r _ _ _ _ rTTTrEg'ae.E= >i_ TTT TiEST iiTT _ -FTs-t T E -. 'GG'rY_ ^T-e tGTT TSTEES" ` rTTrSr v -' ae. �e.g." TEP »STET G•=•`a =- F'P _ "P r&•E F•EG'G TEE'EPr •G==-•G•G E5'e•S r _ TP-»»'r G'»'^ •T GFa GG6F g EEEEE'r EiF•&•`s&• g•E•g•g•m o E 8 �-^ E TT`aT_ - - - - - sTEE Tg.g�e.- g.- ' Tu'e.'F•- . _F'G TTEEETETTSTTrT ig. g.g.g.Pig.i g-g. g.g. _ " g-aie•g. > 8 S STTiiiaiii»TETT&. ETEEE S _ _ _ _ _ rF5•G -F•.e•FE&' -='TTS•»G=»"r @• r =•GE' ' SE=-h'G E rE&'r TTE E•EE'Pa•ri _ E p - " g.> r E TTEETT' TG ES•Fs_ sir^ _ Gr- _ _ 'r »TET ETTEETTTET TEiii iaig-iiiii Ei TTE ES" SEES r TGF&•- G G _^»c•',.-E.`-''-.w s.F•'=•-• 4DE •Errr&•Er rE•E•&•g.G. g.�•^aa TTTT iiPiis_ _ TTEEEE=-• S# _ - r`•q, y, _ _• -r Tg•E ETr EEg' &• g.i €•i=•g•€•ig.g•ig. ig• r&•E T" s F•iF'`' .N&•F ' &F•c•G F• r&•-G� 5•crFr E rr E's i e• 0- TSTETi T�ir TTETETTTT T ST T T9•T - r_ FFF, " 4rr GG5• _ - FT - SEESTE ETEET ET_ ri iig•iiiiiii 9. rr TES G• = SiST _ _ - rTT» - F" 6 •'rGFF E u sTT ET T Tr r E TT 0- E_ ET T 919 ig-a.agii T rGEEE•R.rr TiESi ET_ _ =• it TrT T_ TEETT- FS '••-s'» r " -P ag - _ _ _ r aw- TTS_ mg•i>TiTTTEEEEEETSTTTP TETiT" =•GE" _ ~ •rTE b " EGs F'E-EEE• 's'E'T &•&•E• i'&• ' 'rg'7' _ -P F•g•&•G'P F'&'E» 5' FG-u•G aE&•g•TE'ErrF•g'iig-g•iig• Pg•g.mP STT _ c. ,.y„ G- • ''5,.r•- c•n'a&'Pr ETEEr &•S'E'E T&•_ g•E• e'�'g•i%g•ig•g•ig• ig• rr rr T= •TE•S'Er�9' ,-, »GGEF•=• rr&•G'- iro 5•y �• »`c G'F'g'EEE&•rrEEE&•iiig• ai''a> TTF•TTT`- -i&^=ig�&'�•TTEESSi TTP TE�EEPwr'� -• c Gg "_ FrE " RC• ` TG' - TST T r�P i"s S_ g•ii ig•g•=•g•i=•g• iE rTE TT-.. - Tri TETE^' sG'-•SST»•-� TrT".P, :•GGe - TETTTi iPagaa TTSTTS' >ai=.g•_ _ _ srT E r T T TTP _ rFFp F- - . s= G " 5'-FF TIES iS ie.€.ii:.-g•iig'i ii TET TSSTT TSEEiET Or s • r ggT T Tse'-'-'- c'E•&•PrT=» - F=Eg• &• ErE Err&•EE { _ 1w - _ ig•`-iiriiTEETiET EEETE _ - " _ iii_ '�iT ri_ _ _ _ ii ii •irT ETEEE^ •TTTa " iiig'P�• 0 21PiE_ &§•i rr rr F EEETE ry'cEG F" "sGyFT» T - .. rTTET» TEE ii ig'iiii'"•r i_ _ i ii iir TTTrTT rTE _ T r" »TrrT Tr ST TTTTTSG -Fir ar -T& E•r E r TEE &EEErr i'�i%''=•a 0 E`e•r T TT _ T&•Tr _ - t _ EFGrrT _ ETrET'_ rT G.g.e.a�.i i ii rEi TTTTTT r r E r Fe E•TG•'-_•G G•a'F: ' Fpg' -EPs G'F'TrrE&• EF•TEF•&•_ GE• - B+$ EEr EaiE GE's•EE•r F, 9. T>'•%^`"g'g•�ig•i TTEETT=^ EETEET u _ F- - c•Eg G P GTT EEr .. E ET iii_ ii_ _ _ _ - P EETEErre TTET T TET 9.9191 a,iig•iiriEESiETG" " TTiTEEE ^G» r,P # P =TrSEES rS TT iE ii `_ "_ E_ _ ii iii EErEETTrEETTTT»P G T#"a E' Gar r »TTESEEg' EEESr _ ETi 21 El R,E_ Z ESTTSTETTgg.giEiiiirTTTETETTT rEEr TET» .. E•E - iii_ iiii=g-ig•Eg'iiii ie• iii TTrrTT»r TETSTGG EFF`rT FFG T _ '-_'TTTESTT TTESrC• rrTET TTE TiiPir- STSTETiiEiiiirEiTTrrTTTi ` &` EEETTTT%'Prsy - aTESTEETE TTTE T - - g.i ge. g.Ti EErrErErEET i-GrG FT^'F E•_ Ee'-•Prr G&'EEE• ig'EE•F•aE• P �. Ill _ _ ET TT = e.= e.sg.>Gg.� &•EEr&• TETT EEi EEEE--'»G ~T ra EEETTEEEi ET r ET_ i> _ i_ - - r F'g•ET T rE TTE EEr P. 0 TTSTTSTETTs_ s'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ »ETT - ' »» a c' tF, P TTETT TETTETE• ETr rrg•_ g•P g•g•i Pii iii_ it ii iir ETTEEEP Tg mFE•y FGTG E E TETTTTT TSTTET _ " 'S•r»_ ,r " TESEE TT EEE TT°•rig• ¶ STEST STSTPPE9.>ill rrEET&•&'&•&•E•E&•EET ETTTT " Ei ig•g•g•g•ig-e•i iii ii i= ii&' TEEiE TESTre _ •' eFG» GFG G0 TTr STTTTTT» -ETT T TG - " - - TT TT EE0-11 g. _ _ _ s TEFF TETT EET »EEEE rTE _ �.e.= _ _ _ " iP ig• ii »TTTTrP TTE»» •E 'Gc•i_ » _ _ STTSTT TTTTiiiiiiiiirSTEETTE a•ErrEr a it rriiEiPi- - p _ _ &• ETSEE STEiETP ,. 8 ae.� g.e� ' EEE STTTr air" - - TFceG G or ETi EiiT TETE TTTT - GFG @' 'sGTTTT. ETE F GGa E.• - re Ft TT Tiii TT»TTS TSTSiiii_ _ _ _ rTTTEEp FeEF GGT P •»rT�SiTTTTT ETTES TTi iii_ riiiiiiiii" P �g•i_ ii_ iTT TTTP TSEiT» SGC^i -GTT»'-P _ &,TTP• : r '•rGGs Ps ^ -`^. »TTiTTiEETTSTTTST ErEg•iP 0 0 m = TET ETTST'�•iiiiiiriTETETTiTT EEEEiTTP" • 'r rFu•r» •r 'a-=•TTrrTTrrP TPc's'E rrrr ig• g•g'iiiiig•g•g•g•g•ii" _ g•g•_ g-g-_ g•&'r g•9.' r Ps•ETg•T» _ - ` " 0 -D S'e•r e - _ - •-=T» G PGGTTTgP ETT» T' TE•Fo &• -»G•`s•g•E's'F•T=•»gP•e Ga rr"e• EPs g•ii`=• TSSTET S pTTriiiriiiii TSEETSET iEETSiP E' r"�"F`' iiE_ iig'iiaii5 P-•g•ie•_ =•iii_ g•ig•g•r&•E6•T& - E•rETF•'-•» G" G.F• r& ' -GTE E•rag•ig' = D g.a aig'ig•ir rTTTEE-_ SEiTrr r Fs5•G ' GFspPi F'&`P rTT ETTPaT•- ii iimg•ig•g•>e. .,.i9 iii ri ETE Tw . TTEEEE " r sEi --Sg•�'v.P- D Z EeTETT' TE� ETp a TETET r prr TG G»Gs EGG ET giiYiigi>aie " gi_ ii_ _ TEE TG TiEiET -iPc_ - STrG» PaaFGE TFE G TrTEEiG Gr»TET rr*i m C TETTTT STp TTae're•g.g'ii_ Er»TTG - - €• e'e' g'g' _ &• --'r»»»GGTTTrEG•o» rF9rr G"sEF »' EEErr gTTTSTTiir a 0 ST TTY- TTT TSSi"s g•g'i iEir TETTg e ' TTET'_ >FG=G 5•E•rr€'Pr-' TF• TE•F•r E• g'i g•ig•-'=.g•=.€.�•g• i- e P ' - g.ii ii i&•r &•TPs• EE ^- - _ ' g.e.=. viii&•&ETF•= E_rr F• r'z•"r e'' S• •EE•G' G ' - _ _ _ _ ` N &•F'rrPs.P- _ e•FG•F 5' g•e--= F v iE&•ET F :&•rr g•Eg•E'i ii �L TTSTTS TS"s`sSs_ _ _ _ _ e »FFG' FpGFg E _ GT- - T TTT Ei _ ririiirig • •i .»iiP rir_ ir_ iET TTTTTE ETST EPsG o'r rr P G, Te=_ » EGeF TFF=TP - •g•'e ETT& »rF•g•EEErEi T ETTETTiri>iiirTTETE&•_ P _ TSEET_ YS P _ _ _ _ _ GF•&• _ -gP#TTT=raTE TTE ri Ei"srEEiri�'rii iii iii_ ri_ rTT TTTTC. TETET&• ` q; 6 D r F'F'T F'E' - _ rtYtr pr - - - - - - - - B Z G S TTEiiiiiiriEETEETS_ _ ETEETTT»� _ _ _ _ _ c' '^ETTETEcTTES EEr EE iiiiiriii�s'• -=g•_ ' _ _ e'iir � �EGr EEEErEE�EErETE g•G G�P G• GEF g'z•�' -- s" P 9.EEs&'»~� eEGe _ .P� �E�F•g• ^fir FrTEEa•&'�•�•'' nN m �I ' Cn Er T�E'sP EF'EEF•Ei>aiig•ig•i&'Erg'EEg•E• TE G»e• c SrpEr #ts•Eg E• - �iig•iag•i i_ _ _ E• rE E&•E E&' _ _ _ _ _ _ - e G 8 TET " rEp sp TE sP -gTTTTETET STET EEE ii Ei rriiiri •ii_ - -. FFs�•• Er _ G EG•r ET- _ v EGi t_ a '»»STYE TEr Tg•EE- Tii== Z m 0 C C 2 o rg rFgF EeFErE i�gg Tiig rEEErEFE EC_S.a. GGPsG € _ giiii>g iii i iir EEEE ErEE EEc C' o > gGe.' g^ e•i ETTTETEETr EEg•TTTTT%-» T " r sGGG•r a »EST EEE g•i r_ Pi»iiiig• P ETEEE T- TEEa ErT Eirii Z frl � TETTST STETTST_ _ _ t-_ s_ EET EEETT TTTS it 1-Z_ ,g:s_'.g iEiirii ii iir TEESEE iTTTS» cr Grr - - G TTETE'a r _ r � - g.G- i. r = S $$ �' g. - _ ' e•Erg•i_ _ `g-r g•i i r i i Tri i r irT EETrT SrTTETR. _-- r FF TP s' =ETTTG " F �g EErTEEr - -o-iP D a 3 r EaF EF r F e F F EF F TE»iiiiirTETs EErEE • E E_ TEErE ra a ii g aiilg� e "� g .,e,,,- �" Z >Gg.g.riirTTEETETs_ zEETTr Tr sG»E r »TEE&•ETr- =S•r EEE e, e. g.i_ irE ri riE ETa•TT P &TETTE- FF GE'"r o. E- Z-a. r9. a G•_ »»GGTETEEEETTTTErEEEErT i fTl ETTETT` TT�TETTe _ o _ g -TETEET _ T E�•T rg,. �€.e.aggg.gg.rg• giiii_,.Eiri_ E ETES ' TEST E»r _ FFr FFt_ T -G�'T�pp _ F§_ E» P -GESTEEEETTTEETTTEETTiisaa m y u i n TTTTTT" TEeTETT>iariirETETETTG ri- ii EErTTEETTTEETTrar_ _ _ _ m r Z �7 e.rr Ill?1, »TETT- - EEErr a•G•&•_ •ETx_ •-TETEs o-'P T TE�Ergg'� rggrriri Ei Tg•rir ri rrii_ iiriiET ET� _ TETErG» - GG 5•EG#E G o - _ - C TTETTT TSTTSTT_ e.�s TEEg'TPc PiF=ui •sFTG _ -gTTSe" r STiiriir_ _ _ TTE T T- FP EE EEr rE_ iEiriirri eiiiirii>i' E rTT TT. ' TESTY» YFcc #YF» =Pcgr_ " F peFx F - T • TTTEEETTEE_ giiiri m Z TET TET ErErr »g.9.& tee.TE T T E SEE rw P ETg•TTr^' G.ir_ i ri_ rTE TEP _ ETTrT»- rP Ts•Gc5' F=EE ^=_'=- c m'G'=TE P Gs�• EEE&•» g TTEEEETe•iiirii f11 m -� STTETT` Ill 9. _ _ _ s_ _ _ s-o er4 ' Ept_ T e, - �- g•' G• e. - _ - - g-PeG. PrEEE&•EEs' TF•Ps f•9.& EE' >ig'g g• +$ 0 �0 C7 STETTiiiiiEir E T E rEETG•Er Tg•YTTE= E- eF"r9. FFe. rTT P TT ETE e, g.iP.g•ai ag•&ria g•g'i ii _ ir_ e•ETE TT" P g.aag.i TTETTS T _ _ &- g.9. _ rc' " 9.-a-GF TTTETT &EEEET C1 • 0 0 n (Tl e,e,>g._.g.g. _ F'rG- _ EG'-sem EETTaP TTTi EET_ rE_ TEF.t - P g.g.g.e.e. g TET Q. ET Tree Ill" i_ _ _ TETETTT -TEETTF• -• TES» SiTSE TTEr iii_ iiirig•riiiii r i S_ iiir_ e- TTE EEErr E a » ssP " »G_ EeG»y E'GFG- E• ETEET F,11 - 0) C _ rr TTTTT E` T E F•T E E ii E irriTEiiE T EEEET TTTETTG =GFT SEEt iir_ riiriiir Ert. E.P, ir_ iETE' TTE TTT TTS» TTS_ r T Ea FYP FGGG » EErrTg rTEEE giii r�' 0 D sFr FES - er EEEET EEr» g, G ag•g'r g.e.e.iiriig•ii- iig• TEE ETTg•EEE TT TT» r _ _ g' r• i ' c C � STETTE TETTpE >ririirEirTTETTET Ps-•�EF•�__ __ _ GG•' gF:EG, GETEEEEEEEEE TETT' Eg•ii_ - e,,,.e. ac._ TET EEETEEETrE-e - _ sGsp_ 's'G• =- E-F•FyG yI"rr�•F er T&•E&•E•F• E•TE&•r P R Z D TTETTS TSTT Sir>i iiTirirr TEETETE _ _ - GT e'- - s Tsa-ESTEEEEr EESEE TETTE_ e•iri_ e•g'i Eiiiiriie•_ ' " •-Gp=.Gs ET EFe' - ce•pa » G g'ErTET TTEEE r• 0 y' F•F•E rF•TPe•ig•i>g•EEg•g•r E EE r E E&•Or E, a _ _ _ FE,g. -»F•g•TEg•EE EE•Tg•TTE 9.rr G•iii Ya g•g•i T g'ii g•g •g•%ig•_ ig•_ g•EE EEEEEEETET s= - < + STT = e._ g•GP e.G. T ETEETTE »_ GEo- - >_ g•iig•e•ii' g•ig^i - ig• g'EE Erc-c- & - -F'= - Y G�.'°•"e'eF 'x• P T _ 'sErr -g'EEE&'riiiig'a 8'r F'F'Tg"TEF'F'rm_ > 4 ETEEr e _ _ _ e»-P P m Z g _ e T & TEE E »EtryF F_ rg -GF ETTiS r9. ETG TTTE TETTE» ii ir_ irTE TEETETG TEg TrrTTTr"• F cyGg Gr GFF- g »' --TSrE ErTETE& EEi rn STETTSTE#Tpi- _'_ - r_ rErEE&• - _ _ _ _ F_ _ c F » r` tc'cgTrTS EiT -P'TESiE EErTE >� r P�>g•g'e' ' g'- - _ K { m TTrririrETErETrEE TETEe - 'rp##rss g-e--Tr TTE " TETT TSETSE _ _ _ _ _ _ ii% ii iET TTTTP ETTTTTE G e ` a •a GEFFGE" P GEEPsG -. G-P »»=TTTTg•TETTEEr g'TTTEEET_ _ Gg'rig•g' STETT#TE 't --gTErTETrEEEESrEESEEEETTiirriiaP � 0 0 O � TTSTTSTSTTrErrTrrTEETTTTE EETEEEE- =FFgGrG y r T R TESTEr e " TTSrTS EEEE irg iTr ir_ TTE »TTG ETTTigET M TaF 'r" »Ts 4_ P ==sTTETTgEETE ETEEESrTEEr i a>r r- - irrS r9. TET TE»_ ETEETT »rr E- - §•F - e .$ .Ai 31 EO { TESTET ETirrirET&TETTT" . EEEET» _ #sg�. _ ¢' sseV TESTET _ g TESTTETT TETT- �•i a - Tiri r9. EEE Srg �T TTTET &'.&' S•' FGS » ' `c•G. = -= ETTEEETi rpig�= r�• 8 0 ETTEST TT riiri°•rETESTP TEETT TTEET" GETrT _ETEr E_ g•-� r T -»G- »SEEETET r ETST EETi d >i g•r• m TTSTTS Ti _ »-TEETT» r rEEr»• - G GFE6 _ 6 yy eE s`r aae.P G V R_ -TT EE r'_ ri'E'aT&•E•i _ _ 3i6EO e'- .. �•"GF6FE P »TPrY T •EEr T- ri- ri ig•EEEE &•E IEEE •TG Eg•EE TGGP g•gi's>`s• F•EF•F•EF•F�F{{{Eri TEETTT- G »Err T_ _ ITFGGFaE» GE »&TET» TT ''E •TEri r�_ iig•�•�' E&•&•Er EEE EST r»_ ' - ETE ' •TE�p er _ - " ^9•F• 0 A TTETTEFI�•o-g•irg•irrEETG�• T& EEE•r_ _ _ _ _- P - - .�r_ ��g -ici• ar•�G�s•E r . . _ _ =G _ _ - - r _ rEr - # PP- - - e MATCH LINE &r g•g•i=-g•T EEE•- EEE - T' y' a rgr _ r s eFF EE rr E'ErrE ETEE•i g•g•g^=•g•T #� P x' - GF=" _ _ Gg.>Gg.s Er Tr&»TEE Er,G FG s GsTGs• T - -GP TETTE EST - g.&`EEE g•g•i�G•r iET@�•ET TT�TTTT TTETTTTTP T1-1-9,TE E EEE Ti TTG•»»_ G -_Gc # G -s•FFsC••r »EEErr - P ETETi - _ air» MATCHE Tire•_ _ _ - - - TEST» _ - »»»TTrT ETTT E- g• P -TrT TE T TT TTE rGTs'=- _ " - c .g<Ge TG ESEEE Tg•ETTi PiiTiPa g�..�� G'iiiir Ei EETEETEEEETEEEETTT" Prr G'E' # s r'`E`ac`G_ -g9. TTg•EETEE TTET iii g'i_ iEr ESTE_ -u FrGr -g' �F TG " T#xF= -ETg•EEEE � TTETEE Eri •^g•isa 9 e'c- Zs TETT»T T A.III, EEEEETr E»»J P r - rG P F6F""" G __ »TESTTTTT TETE_ ir" Trr re TSE»" G•g•T TETTT GFG- Fs -G F•r Gs&• g•TEr EP ' Ei EEr TEir_ iriiT`s a TrTTE _ r _ »s r FGEFy GF P - -{ .. - PsTTETTg•irEirTTEEEEEEETEETEETETT»--EG e.P =~ =rTETrg• rEr»EPs 9.&F Er ETTTE-P #T»TE SPT TTTrE-P G, " G F>rF G•'rT TGFe•» ErTTEETETTri- ` riag•`a's m � � - o _ a _ s - T&•FET»:•_ - rTT»P TTETT> a..e'ir TEETTEST 'ETT»»G_ g - GFrG"a »T ' G� -TTS _ ESE ETE &•Err TE ETS aeg.- r' ErF•raaP >e.g.rg•E E TE`s T= EErEEE >e.e. g.G e.= e. g.= e .ee ea eg - gsegeG e- e a S5255' 20 " W 217 . 51 ' ( DEED ) e N�5 S52 55' 20W 216 . 51 ' ( ACTUAL) .51x1 •�•�•� �•�•� �Q �•�•����•�•�� » 992559 5555515551 x•��•«•�x15xx115.51111599x11.511111111x1 Q 9 W �a•« e a ^��� ^�a•p•� •s•�•����•�•� •d�•�a a•a d •�•�^��� �+1���2§^ a a•��•��^�•����� °�a�a•�•���•��•������•�•�•a��� 1d 1x51 11x9.5x1111 x15xx115115ax •�•��� •��• •��•s�•2�•��•d• •R�•e•4���•�•���•�•�•��8�•�•���$a���•�•� ; 0 o QQ � •� ^191x1 .,•� 1 911111x1191�-a2�-9^���•�•� 9x+�+� x355995911119x115xxx15xxx1�•�•�•�•���•�•�•�xx159x -Will 1115.5x11 a 9.5x1111 x 111111.5 1.9 13111111 1111 +3��•���aa•2�a�a��a•9��•«•�•�•�a�•�•��•�s�•�•�•�����•4�•� W W J 0 �n 1 51xx4511 1�x•�x1•«115�11•�91 •� v4^ " a�•a��•�•�•�•��•- R Z iiIIIIaIIIImiIIIII•� •2 .2,V,X11: - x ee11191. 11149.5 U ( ���•��� ��1.51111x5.5x11115Z }(� �5x11x1 .5111allo � .xx � 8191111111111x11111111551 W 1�1xx91x5e Q�xa.a51x11 91xx11xxx19x1151x11911 x55$5 +9 zw axl x•�1�1111 11111111911x111111911551519 +! 5•n= s4.5•+ _+! •�13995551xx1.491x1599x119xxxx 5�•�•�1 CL 5 w u 0 Z a g� �1x111xxx15 11x19x155911591x159xx12111 x 1.?s x778-_+ a1 aa1399211xx1911x159911.4•a 9.911111 151 aa31941111511xx159x9 an a3551x1191x15111 a5a x-.7= x 111595 a 11145.5 1111111111911 x x x59 1111151111999x1 1 '$ f4 1 134 15291 s^=47 x128 _5 "5 ",11555.9-55xx11xxx199xx1151xx1 151 Y m xlaslx•�x5551xx11 •� dx15111s5- 34411 1113 5 115x95951x151x11a1111 11.411x1111 9x11 ° ri 11•��1x5.511115x11 s 1111 55555p� 4'33«_,-, +?4^=•4 •$ d• '9•�5•�55.955•�•�55•�• 5•aa55a55.4•�•4 5555. 5 ® `T=�� �/� x 1111xx1119xx1x151x11xx-55555.355VIR .5111 ® Z ~ Q � W�3��4 �+y�a� 199 x 1183.9 .58419 d•4+?3x9119511xx5911•35555x11955 1' 1�315s35'91111 9 911 1.5 1x139 �'42a 455.355555555.3.5111.3.3 a55.3511155191 x•4555 x e 5 1111 '''444'''• '�55 5 5 455 _ _ 5 - 3 a"45.4'45.3'45.45 x 55 xxx55xxx•455xx55 • +35x1 � _ V ] 0W73x1 •815�a •4+9x " 9d 555 `2153 1.4511-559x1111a.a1e•4.411111 x53?� 55x12 = 1x1 1929+355555-5 5 x x 119x•�xx15x1 ill 5•'+455.3 ddE 1.51115199x111111 •44•••••4���4$$$$$ 11.3���4445 a3 "5 ��dd •Y _ d "•3.4.3.495.9-5511 x•45551 1.45.3x55.3? •4x5.455 �b Q (� xxx1519xx1111xx11 1911115191x111 11599.355x.9 955555 «51 - 92x1 1 1 "193x1211x1591xx11xx11x11 955559 59.5111x55911 x•3955 _ +9 5 'H+9'S5 5 ^=9x•49559a9xxxxx5xx5xx55x 1111x1 W Q W xx1111xxx11511x11x 1111 91.51x191 x•49 111911x15199122 1xs 112 AA A.G 5 7 '5x315555151.511151151x11 999459 55 x x•45.45991 IN In 11 155 II1111115x1 511x15x5a1511 511 5 ax= .'-� '�' '°�'=511 995x192511151.5xx1xxxlxxx •4.351x•3 x 11 1'4591x111.4^45551 Sad 11 5 11x33 5 11 - 4155959.951xx111x151x515 951x11 _ 0 xx159xxx111511xx 111 11111151x1-5 1555x92159219 52 « 9111 5 •:'°+.�^_ 5 2 '19x1a1551511x11xx 1.4911 xxxxxx� LLI Q 0 5991x1.45599 x 11-1•4x59 59 45$1 1 11121995211x2 x `-5 eaa .4.e_ s„g+,�+s sold x11595959xx•4.4xx155x1x•4 1x1151 1y- 0l I x1x11xxxxx1115.51 1 x195 x'4"4 _ - - "' 4'g .5 a''9A 5re 15 5 919 5-51111.4911.4x1 x•4555 x555911 11144.9 111x1115 •41.4 51 x11$$11 9x5 °5995559 511x'911 ; 15= 511 7338 5 411399555.5x111111111.5111x1 951115 ' QV x11111.511x11111.51x1 x11 x�xcH 44?3 -995 19.95559191x511 ' 11.4 8 7 5.4+39 =11511 a214x 1111191119559 111111 V 51x111515111111511.411'4 91114$ 41.9 -559 511119 3:19x 11 " •411 3 91•' +7 33321 911.3995955x1.49 x•4.45111111511111 7 3m)5 1 .2 1-9 8111 •a� 952 9119x115 �}3 x13129 1a.' . - _ .91+9 312155x111559115.51111x1 11 til III xxx 5 F 1155xxx1111511x1.211 511 59 199 19533323 3333111 d1e 1 55 dx1x59955521115xxx15xxxxxxlxxx > O1 1151xxxx51551xx1551xx1x 1153315•°91 9• x153-51594 " x911 e a -5xx13211211151xx515xxx11151559 551111x1111155 1.4.3115x111 95 a $;6 yy....�� 115 5+ 91 .,d--• 91^41'491 d d =4591x1519-511x15191111115 5911111 O Q 91.451111x1115511-211151x1111 -91 1 111 9 911 1a- 'a-a•' -9x11559121 " ' " a " 1 '21511151915511 x 11111 x 115559 9559 s" I'm a 1111.4.4.455951x11 15�9a.5x11151.5 'a1 5 9111 511 2 a x'J - '4991115994 "x11 ° 411x1 a 411x1 a 55 .,59 559x111111111111515 xo 151x111^9 551 9 13519994 " x 41x119129 -3351 =15991195111555x11111 55111.5x 111x•411111111111 15.9 1111151x19 -911 1x9 _ 4Aa9 4 re 1x35955911xxx5xxlx x111115 ' s » s s _ _ _ � - 1 a5.�.'e_x a.'a_rd.81 "4599141 22= '4"39-- 22xxx511x1551xx51x 9591x11 5911111x11 8591 111 "1x1222 12 11•= 4- - „ " 15555111112x511x111x992 1x1 a " 411 18,9asjx34xo 5d5x�5 918.4 41.9++ x 2 "1x59519a551x551955xxx111 g 6 11x12 s,a.aa s.aaxxx� x1159151 3x1 •' 9 4 " 4337 ah•=+•s'a d' 9ad < 11 s'81 . 8+°9.9 1•! 19311.9151151x115115555511 R 6 $ $ x11x5•g59•�•$1•�xx1 " x155115 5+� 4.8.4 4 - 111?81.3335 „ad<da x^=^-''3'9 581'"'p == = 91311911x159xx111155559x � a x115 5 5 5111 x 1111 x15.9155 5 5-= x'ra sa,8= _a _ _ - _ •4.9.3'!•.833.49 8-3.5 a3^•9'a ?3311 5 =131151111111511x1111111155.5x xxx11155511x1115 4 x515119 1 1 s _ ,a_ _a a "4=-1a -_ax - Mn19 . -:48. 1d s131111515511.5 111 9519x1 seas sag s a s z �a a = _ - 3 a a �2 5193».3 43495 X. 155319.991511111111x11 555.9x11 ' 55 " " " °111151 ° 1x1 .,$c3 r4ml1x1331 8111 •^a ., - � .w - 2 1 41333 8c•�a -d113291515x11x1xxx 11151x, x1111.5x111111551.5x13�11�. 15x1�91 a •' 853 _=5? _ _ _ _ n '- & a9 9311 d11329x915x1151xxx 1x1151 111551x1111151.51x1 x•�5 519.9 ° 99 •4 " = _ _ _ _ 2 111 _ _ _ _ sa a s s 555.59xxx115591xxxx$�5•�1�x199'a5525x � x 5 _ 1 _ _ _ 8 +�+ .^ 1 x x 5 115 _+3 115 9 a2 tl1llx111a5 "axx�ax 911111 o � a n .+ e 155911x112551.51x11.8. 45?�x19.99 91 - 58 _ s _'3An= -a9c"a= 3d >�3 + d ' _ + a •� de re513595a111xx a 1595< "x 1111 1551 . x115511xxx1555xxxxxx55•�y.5x99 9 511 9 xs: _ ., -448333 _ x 5 15551555.5111 5551xxxx155511xx x•4.45.41••$66.,`"333x955 �- 1 _38438132 -9s _ =x3438x84c ( 2 915215111x55.5.5111111x1 1591xxx1151xxxx11559xxxxx1a111y3x 1 5 431944x7 - _ _ _ 333x1189838 x• ^ 5554 •' " `5x35219951.5�xxxxaxx lAS 11111111x55.5111111x115.51111x155.5x539ra 9 9 - 393 7 = _ '9'9°'1'=_•34'=1^ + '=3'911 1 "11911511x� 1a1111a51x x �� + _4 x88-1111 7• 2 ax y. 4-443-5x1 21521a55�xx "x x11111 Li xxx551xxxx115551xxx111111xx521 1 3 =x a - a x51x1xxxx151xxxxxx5155x 1x115119 5 5 - ns - 8 711-. x. 33 7513 1 °91 '115295551111 5111x1 O U .5x11111155551111111111555.5111x11•41x599 2 1 "- _ xaa'8 .151 11191.551x111 x11115 55xxxxxxx5551xxxxx1552xxx1x 9225 3a1 - - - a,r,{ 79x83 -d1 -131951ax 1111 1915111 J ~ xxx.211111111x111111111111x11999 x914 ^44 5 -4 ' 1555x1111111551111111111591111111115 252 � a -_ xe a 4 1a =s 311 a1 253125411x11 x 1191 > Oli .5 xxxx1559x1xxx559111xxx55.5x119552 12 _8333 _ 8 x xa x - '''? _ 77 774. d 1135551991x9 115 x11 J = O Q g a a x11119.51x11.4115 11111111111 x 11515111'5+4 - -•`-85'94• n'S _ . 81311 _ `2 s _ _ _3 =48x9_ 1 :x13519955111 .5 1x11 W 51111135591 x 111 x 5511411111111221913-1 s _8~3x44 ~ _ 9 � 55393 . aaa 4+.3 _ _3 a ~3519 -553x121959911 x^3xxx9 W _ x11.3 x11111111151111111 x x 15.1xnil 5.5x1111511.8 -4 - .s.. •8444 83853=. 1 774 - ax _ 314 "41111x1-559119 1111 ° Q 2 s11xx•4.4^41x11xx151xxxx1511�x19xx9555x 15• +a c _ •s• ' 7 _ .- - s a + a 13.33.5: _ _ _ a 1 d •3 d 951139511919 1 a 111 55 xxx1x51xxxxx111xxx1 •4.4x111155111.8 -119559 1 a•' 'x - „a 9.q _ 51y4 •9) �• - 55 _. '=59111x9 _ d1 =x•51.49159°51 5 151 xxx1159xxx1155 •9��9'•• x 599x11�5 1 °•519x19• 555•=15 . x 3 '' a-3 _ ^ a3 + 9111x191159 x 111 O Z W 1111x52.5111x15 �1.,4sY3.9.4F4xxx-�•4(5��1511.49 51573x78738x4c $• �9 -dt9 _' x• 3^4 _ _ 9 "a 4153x91199 1911x11 W d' 91111x155111 x "117�193x81�44::44a x•^519335 4 5x•939.3884"8= e a 4 34_ n +° _a _ x19"1 a 9915x1 o11 5�1g§��yy191 Q U U xxxx115x1xxxx x 111111x1 s5xxla°39135 11.93944'.3,'3^ x 11 a ='- 5 _8 _ _•f 2 3331 5 5 91519115 513.412x11 U Q 111111155111x1115 e " 15559xxx'4511x5511-5 9x5 1 54643-? 4 '41 = "2- 115 �d �+' 33 _33 = '9 " 3411= _ +311 - 11159-ax95 2 1.5.9 x 111115x111111 xxx11551xxx15xxx5512x3 919.5 _38•°49 12 -•'x 1•°1x3 •3,.•41 �� _888 _ 958•?x 5 821 153x999 94�111.4 O cif O x 11x1.4111$�4�4� x s251xxxx •42211 11•44951xxx 5 s 5 "921x1 3314 911 " _ 88 _ a NN •3849 =•3 5.5119x9 9 °2.415 x 211x1 a •31"41.4 s= 1�.51xxx x'�15x •� e a•�•3xxx - s _ 111x1141 - _3a 389 a+9 •5 115x15 'NN 99`"'9491 Z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ W 55 5 x•4.4^4.4111 5 1111 259.51 99991 1 - 1^39 21953 x 99x119 x'! 2 - _ n 1 F84 •4156 1 5 1x13.391 9q3��55p O J 5.9 1,��»8' 21x111115 x�4 5 e " v x�x 1 "5252 131 9 - 92111.9311 2125291'2`2+49 _ ° 91 _ =711 x7xH5 5999123x2 21g•51525 s a s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ✓' - ^ 115x311 9-5115x1 11 •'' -x43 _ _ _114 xre38 2=15x31 2�.gg++a9_i a•99-5'S5 °5515.5.511.9 da a•a a•�d e•a•a•a•a°aa 5•a•5.5 d•�•a 5•�•�•a•aa a-a•a•�•s d•a•a•a a•2 d•�a9.5.55.59a-51 d9•a-515��5 xx.54�5�1 ^ W 51.5x211115511111155 x 1� 111 x1101511 _ _ _1143 ° xlada9axx ��yy44 "xx7� 311 _ _ 42 13334 251x515 9$$999-5as1411155112592a22d5aa9511a991111155159951151 5111511a9a95595aa5aaaa91a15e 5511x1 J J m 1551x11115551111155 5 •a•41511xxxxx 222122 315.5991 221122 •°•9222221 X41 a a _ "a c.p.:a a8 9911 3x1112211222°55 " 9.9 - - 241552229111229112991 19991x1119 2 x111522222191212221 - o Q 5599x4.44.49.3xxx•4.4.4.4�ra.g•4 5.3x1 x•e _.a.al ate�.. " 151xxa15219 15533 91x99g�_°x•61159111 1a 3 5 .1 ua _ 1 1 a d 9 ss9111151xx1 9 1 •3 15.5xx1994�x 11151111x9-5115 159 1 1 2952 Ky'9 -5•5159919!, 114 - _ xxa28? 2a='3+3 3xx ^21 "x1 53x5122221 x1555 22 1 22111229x152221 2 2 9911119.3.35.33x1111111.5199 1551x1 LLJ . 1 e5 e 1 e �4 55511 15551111 1�8 �+$ x 51 1 eexxxxl5.51x1 9 .4 -1151 " 99.511 2 221 22225291'5 5re 1 a _ +9939= 59319 _ a 1 sx _ 111152995555 a2� 2 115522113332x1 5 33321133333333212x1552-5d.511x11 W U �_ 5111x11 155 1 1@ xx� 1 " 55511x4111111 e 1111x52 45922 - 19 -1 9 _9119 225x2111''5 Ida _ _938.4'' 1n24 _ =111195911x11111115593331113.93331119911 51 1151 55 5 12111211111155125213x11922 °111x15 1551x1 1 1 911x9 e 1111511x1151 59x11155.51 -5195 -59 5122 955 19914x3(914= 3x = 5 =13 1119 "s5 11x2 - _ =1111x11 H s " "s x151 15551111151x1 x11551111111 x 11x559a 1 -95 x 115111 •� 1.9919x192 ' _ 3 _ 422333 _ 121 +a "=.51511533xxx3311•�15 d.r x.75221111^" ' 1•- 1 "29.4.2•area - 1 '52925x '99 "aa1 •-1.913222 °51555 W' W. °� = 1 °5x11 e 1 _ ,�_ 4 •3_9Axa3 .4 22155511xx115525as 19•= " 444•' 1 x'°•tl•'22 _•'d9_a 1 2 1191 112 '951359 22-5551 111x15 Sex 119 1 1115111151151x11 1115511x11 155 15111 x 111 1 111x55159 51531 - - •�; «`tltl 1 „ _ 2 s.v a s 2- 291x11 22=x111 5511x1 19 oo115x1x115x1xx5151x 15.45x115.51 11x1551 5111 1 1. 3x1 11151x9222 -a 1- 1 •= arere9- 1d _ _ _ X23 _+! _ 58 '9:,a a2111225119x 1x 91x11 _ ss 1 155111x1551 11511x1 1 5591 1x111 5 x155 1111x1111515 1 883 _ _ _ _ d 112rea 52 _ _ -77x11^85 " x•O= - •=5 "- 3•s 1 " •° 241.4x151 1 x 245513x " 45995 ' •555511 2535 159.955 �� _ e�51x1 "11x119�xx 1111. s ss 1151 5511 51111x55199 21 114 • 53.9+3+9•* 8481 1 1 2 x11 9378431 e " "a2s•= x 29x1 'a1•a==-8421 2 d x3.9.9-_•935•'9 1x•99.9.3899 - 113 159.9.49 511x113 55xxxx511xxx5 °51x11111 11 ° 11 48.1 .31 =a.7.* 1xv s .a s x s sa sx _ x 2 a1»aa 11x155 .5111155x1111155 x 11155111 55x11 "51 x44 1 5x1115 11 xxlxxx51951 216 x 91881 +.13.91 1 111 9 11 54 a" _ 2 2 _33 _15 1 _3 _ _4 _ _•-•'a 1 1 __ _ _ _9.9911 x1353'98'_+=•9 a" 51.9 x5.9511 O O t 1551x1 xl5xxxx15xxxx15.5x11111 511x11 591x5 x 1151 15551 "11151x15519 35 3 xxA3a 7+348"a 549" 1 55 - 148x9 1'_^•95 5 1x•474.6433•§ _47171x44;5 1 5.4.9711x483= x •Q a•s•344.5.99.95 3 "11 •4915.91 O � x1111155 111111115111111x15.511111155x1 x1.9 x1111119 1.5x11 5x111151 xxx5xxx55.5112 25 13.5 51x8877 11x9 5 - " 11 9143'8 1 3 x141354 11844a448c3 " - - -« - _ ti 1�.x.q_a'� '1611 x15591 1.4.4111 1151xx1551xx151x1xx °11.4 551 115 5511 xxxl5xxx15xx11xx - 41115 x557+711 x849 1 - 9 - -3 _ .,saaaa _^ .99_7 1aA4� 11 a a1�77a�37~ - _ _ 8 x ' n -.�9 •4.9.9 •? - "au - x -.=a 4 as z 11151x , 1151xx1151x1x15x1x1 51x151 x51�x x 51x5 155111151x1555 511119 2 x838 113 _5 x 2 19 x _ '34 _ _ _ 3 _1 2 .71 3 _ " " a7a _ _ 4 _^A5 rot . " a 51 191199 sssss ss a s s ss s 5x1 5 " 1451111 ° 5x1 51x15 e11511151x19 x22111311 15=4 41x33 _a 251115 ,,^ _83 _ _ "3 ac33xa5x 9^9.4 - 8 4 " _"95.3.371x3.93 •4.93454.9•: 3•x51.32 1139 =2 •39159.5 " 111 1015x1 05151x11 " 11x0 8848 2 2 2-= a 3 331x9.3 .54577 _ �=113 xa18 •a '4.9.5.93x3983 13347 - 3311x9 _3.44 21 x119.9.5 •a s•a51x 111151x11155111115.5x11 511 "19 11$1551xx15xx11xx15xx 1 .5x1151 12 119x1 1178 _ a _as 2 1 96x1= - _3471 x e _88x71.4.893 °3848811^•°'3.4'4 34•^_^= _ •-345x5 _-9 d e 199 x11211 t x11559 x'4'491 x'4'4'4'451'4'41111 1.5x11 e5 111x4.5_ x,4155xx1x 551x15 e •951 115-2Q •51.3x1 1x1 F _ _ d d 1 9a _ 9a - - _ 8 a. a= " 9 x s _ _ _ 1x15.4 1x1111xx5551x•4.4.451 15x1111151 115115 ,•e8.11551x151x " 11x5 s'• 91195x111 x53 153155 5 a x911 tl x „ 3 _ 3 � 1x1 _ "1 •3=4 _•8 n71 _+�•5 9.4?•343+3-•4.4•` •9x•4•= - -a•4 •�'4•`-a•9'-�9 - x d•elx3xx•5.51 saal 5s.s sea s9s s s as a s s, 99 s s s a1 8 •'-x11 x•884383 4.53L038•s4321 11448.~12x9 3 x19 - 2s - _ 59x1351.59.5 1 1 e x11 a 111 e e °x111 "5 e 111 11 11 2 .911x111 1111 x 1 x 151x5 8111 ® 223 ^ 3a 88 77 -"„71143x83 x2.489 a•41.9•" 1 11.4.5x9 d 54 1 d 919x51221 8•°1x5 1x•s1x151xx 1.4.5x11155 115 111 11x15 551x11 111151x1151 1 5x15511 15xt�1212 1119 _92' 1 2 - " 9111 3•� a as 8a aa - x a s1 .. 218 1 - " 1x155 xxx151x1159xx151xx 511 /15 /1 551 1x155 x x 11 x 151x1 x•4.4 15.5x 1x1 1929 3515.84 •9 ' 311 _ 1 .•93 ^93 _ "1 _ _93 1 11111x1 _ a' 1 ., e 5 _ d 4x131151 1x555 1x1.451xx15xxx1591x 511x11 9111 xx151x151x151xx111.5 5x111 1115x59-529 15x15- a •343 -119 `7 3^•^ - 558 _4348.451 •p x 2 _ x " - 9 4s 5v 4 - _tl 4155915 l ss 1 ss9 955.3x11 x11 51 55111 x115 1 1151x1115.5x11 x151 15159115 9315: _ "21 5 =+73511 .4 _ _ d _ _ 8_•93414 _2 _- +911129 1199"9 " _ _ 'atlx251 + 1111 ° "5 xxo5lxxo " 1x1 a s s 11 - - - _ 1911 2 -589.527._ " .x ' .x x 233x1 1aa` _ •1? 1_d5 9244 49229 x x29 «a5 9 .3388 21 213111 x11551 11x55.5111511x151.51111111x1 x 1551 °51x151 155ext " x15 222 '3'511 "ss a _ � 4 _ _s _ - 3 " 14411449911192 a95reddx 21• s1 "x<d?d tl •92 29 nx•?'39 3 - 15119 111111151111111x111 445 =111 511 1115x115.5151x11 x1511 x1155 ° x155 9811 - 1 " 2 11912 11- n711 5 -g a� a a Sa59x1115111xx2a " ' 121 x•51•'115111 1299 4 " 711x3 1 5 41x319 x1551 11111x1111.5111511x155 x151 2 e x " 1529~60 1 511x155 55x11 1155x9 -2 '11.9191 •sad 8=112 21_4x9 a _ _ _ _ _ _ - 55 . 551x111.5x55.5111x5.5x115 1x•4 51x•451 -=199.91595 1x15 15x1 x922 1x'°2 2 23 787911 _4 n _ 83 _ x a _ _9 " 1111 x1225511xx11x 1 115111115 15- 1 •9•'922 3s., 2.47^_�= 2 ;11311 I 91 s 9 s ss» s 1 1x19 x11129 222255-5-5155-5•9551 595 -11551 '21492511+31 13•'4'48 713882 9n{g "sa _ 1 154 •93331155511 4153 33353111 -a s7 7x885 8111 ° °11111x1 1��9x �9.1axxs 9ss9 _ _ _ _ _2215.9.9255-a 1522119 " -592 -99212 •8522113x14 13971 391x:=a1 2+3 _ 391°1 1=1 3 11 159393.93111533331199 111 ? ' -1 ., 173=112 111•'�9a •4511 •111511 1.451x111111.3 0 "111 " ^ 1 " " 1 _.o..`:w _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.1922 -5-5219 -521531x: a8•^34 37731x1 - ='F'6- - '' 1 ^ _g'�s85 1 d1 x 25 25x•3333311 _ x1315 x33152.92 19 _ •6 x3.42 9 ' 415295 111�@-111 15x1x15xx1.4511315x35 x1552111 22291 _ _ _ 9 »9 c _ x887 a _ _1 ='='4885 x re 5 _22 2 11x13155311 1x3591 335 a - 1 92 _•9 5 1 9 3+.3x., 11.19 +1 "911111 a v o � � n d •451-8.•4.4 11115511x51.5x1115.3111.41 9'41x5521 9.99 952295199x2 1 e 5 299222 -113'91 d ax _d5 x753 _ _5 � 1 - - �e 1111115111551115x1 5.451 15/99221 3313x12221222229222 -2215911 _ 59314 21.82 ..•31.3+3.42 8 8 = 4 3.91 _•� � 9 1 5335x3355351 511922113 - 1.987 •_ _ 484` '2 213292 .�gg..gg��x11 _ _ _ s » ^ _ x a 1 11= _9.4»77.x6 2 3 1 22 5511.91152x113 35915135 1119a•J -•'a'ti 1 '� ` �-�13x11 x15x1x15xx115xx15xxx551 2159 1 x55x113x1515215511522911.1 521°2112 1 111 _48 13 _c _ _ _ _ 9 9 .588 "x 7.Q.r, x U 1 " - 1135122 L-.�3x 51 /11991 x11 x x1151xx55 x11511 ., - 152x56=911112155299211121x32 2259.5151 3 45549 339 - d 81 - 9829x478 91 » 11 15199x9=11322x1 " 191x3 a . 195 s ' - 1 x 1lxxxxl5xxx5xxxx52152-519.922999231 •- 132522222211253333x1 29215919 1x91.411 8a , - 385 ` -13^=89888 _92 92 3 99 31 1x21122 25139 38,11 3x8;7 574x8 2 111 E' .5 _ _ _ 5 33x811 x•31 11 3 9 1x1 " 19221 2(321 " ' " 5.9'7819 x•8.3.935 d 1 57 =1 3252.19 Wx1 ii I ii 111511x55221995595215952113 492992.9522x15.91111 x31 222922223 5'52'4 _�, _8 _ _ 921 -9x52 _3 etl 1 192x1 " 1 •9 1122 115 •e 828•' •975.9.43 _xy d 1_ -129 x11922 „U., � �5 1a.e1.4.4.451xx•4.41x9555229a259222292993 e+l 2929522x139 _ 1 •s•511 -•925122 1 =a,'Sa 3 4sa _141 3 - 5 5 d1 111 2 1111159 3 1159 •a 5 _4 N1 ra i3 ' •=5 2 •"a : 11 •- 11x1119.9 2•a �� •�+ x B•41xx115xx152215521292252522e922x1 _ 15 1925x52515 53'52 2251991 'S "3x,4 _ •�,�27x41nF A4 .-� 1 -�j _ 5 25 •99.392211 gg„„135 311 xa '•9.9 w•_�83 =7 9245211 a5 3.92 4411.5222 J x^4xxxxl5xxx5x15921959211522592215252 1111 95922559x1 •5319 2111 2 _ _.g.5 2774n _ _ •fx 1 32 9.199 2 x 1°1x12 524 x95388 '•=x 5.61.5114 x11221291 1 xx55xxx15559225595911525.921122121 1x113952 22122913 118 15911 12223+9 1 stl +9 8 191 2225 11 _ 61611x•43 52559.9225 Y .5 113 .5xxx55xx55215a291922x59259951592 1121x291 25599211 x191 113151 ^_5 1 13 5 x91229211 1191x11321 119 s -2 111 91119x92 129x1191 1 493 119 239.4 - =24 3'P.-9� - • _ 2 •" a "d'1=da= `- 5 e•9 33 •93.91111129 x1111221111 9 d '4 _8.5.9 •35 1 d •m d•4 x 133 • 511 2 1551'$ a � 5 2229 x 11x1 °11 x11 - 4 _ _ - 55 55 3 52 111115211x11 21x1155211 11111 q4 9 •4.4+@1.4.4 5xx1515a925512231119x 155955929152511291 91119x1 1131x321 19x1 113 °5 21 5x311P7.3.55.5 °5.95x4 91 5 1x551115222519231 -1 51 222521x15 915225511129115 9191x9291 °5112 31.9 •6 955129 1892 - -a 25919915545 3 ax 3 2 9x•91215999 "113.9 - •- x1.9884n3828 _32 - 1 as 1 5211x1 5x1 e2 0 91112 25-- x93-•491 1®-*a_ " 5 9211 19.9333 13 2 -- 111x11 55- 11=-i3•S 1x7721 _ _ 1=15 41193' 22 4521514 9 s1.41xxxa21552x31s 521 a 25 a °1112 335 3 _ _ _ _ d.91133 2 11.9 x 11112 x tl - x•='9'521 •3"9 x'a 3.4 `232111 22.314. 119 922$ ! , x.�.g�1 "5xx15259221x1311 321 1115x•91 5 - 1 39333 113.5113.9x1 x1522 5 �A333'S'� a , 1 �1 21 tl da1199 311 11 11 "5 52x23 1 +S a+?•498 '?9'4.4 x 13251 3•K5•B[1552 _122x11 lJ '93-+81.411.41 5119 5 2 2 5 911x1 93191 123315 - 211x9 191151x63 9119x3 93.9478 4= - 49 _ _ _ " 1291013 3 9 919 13x1 13331 _ " ^48.gaa '91.5 J9 1ra 2- •922x522 9l9'�2925 1 111111111151x2-529912231 1115x1 9235122x11 11 - x 99135 11'8 3x378 N78e 1 111 _ x114.4_. 5 45x591 3 333 33559 32221 311 - 4 238311 88x11 873 - 35222x3•° x'.4121 199 J• d 1 2311 5439 -833 34x111.9 "9.94x9 sssxx511592251152 " 131x591 " x192" _ " es ^ 'S2� 2 ea_a rs .y xa885 _ _ _4 •3.4248=•^-._ 2 ==111 5911x11 '•-11x14.2 5.9x1 3 Q5 I.t_ S c .a•9 •4.4•s�151-512215 511331 95135x11 s x22 5 5x111 - _ _ 9 _ _ _ "2_x •9xx11x•9.951155 5x13151355 92< •'1 111 9448 •5.4.9 -'3 3 219221 8 11111 •x' �� O Q �gg5 x15159219a21911311 311 19x35 9 - 1 " 251 _ =x11.4 x 83 +! 4+94•'332 11 _ _ _ s5-25mac^x21121 1312225 - 3 jP5-1 '^'489 _111 - •'" 121 x1131 x 15521 22x1 W. m -s+1x?5 x5515.9.92252.51112.911° 19522• 1_ 9•'9x15 x 58 S 71.9832 - �17 1x- `91.91 33.92.9 ' e '® 1 " 12.91 2a =+ 459.92211 1123 v 25x11 Fi;719x1 •, rN c x38782 xa 211 19x6 �. a "- - s 5 1 112115219.9211112.9191 19511 5.59 xw.n _ a 941 _ 77885 119 115•'_ x9.933.6 _ 1212x2- - 99111 x11 2� s•a�9 _•.s4ss 9 4229 ^� 131x111 •311 1a -5x3992 4935 411 J U O � 111153-5195111x15231 _ _ " 1 s •� `459 11 a1 _ 311 dd � 11152222 53 °211x33 ^ 12 2 ` v m � 1. 11922193.5.2 141131 e _ •p 3•a•55 _ 9= 1.9.8 -•91 xa _ " 12 - d2 a d2 - - _a _x.31.4.9 J° 313 1 tl'9 '95• 11 ;5x•4.4 a •5 •`3 _•3.9^'9 9 265 e 3111223131 1223313329955 _ •w N W W_ b s.asss�s5 2 5 5 _ _ _ 4ux x•' _ _ _ _^4331 - x 925x9 .� .8x9.5 s a 888•_ _ _ - 's a 1 1 8 115 73.5 1 a 1+359"225•°151 19221 5222x111251159 S ¢ 52/2221111 111 3 1 9Ws 2 _ I a 15159211529111251x3522 1211•- _ _3 9 _- .y�x Ya 1 634 1 123 839 4925 a'2e _ -1x "ax 859 " •94sa4a38.58 x9292 4•- .'� 1 •'-� -111 x a 52551 33 - 155212111552112 - 2x15 111x111192219121 10 41542 x 311x2 42x11=• _^-•'-�1 44 _ -1 1 5 _ _ _ 975 _ _•a _ _ _ - _ 9 =+7+3443922 d 1 - a 221 1 x•9.9 a •9•Q xa •" <;5111 •`a132x11519155a2 1599 9 Y 1.451112119519x5351 • 1122522x15 5 84 x848-" 183x= - _ AA _ •_ - - 17 •917192x+389 e x d x _ _ - 59 - •'- ., '•9115 - .",9515111215.9222 551 � Oe� 1x11111112111211 s •513• 92112 •412 , _ "479744= 28.9 2 983•? x18 _ _ _ _ 4 _ x7.925.4.98 1149x11 x '4511 sx 3511515522125 925•g++�.; O 0 - 4A °f " •q x11348 s 949.1 1 a=8543.55+3.9.5 1 •93312•"9 3 45911 1x3515295921122 225. 119 L, >- - o •"?1155 -99221153x '^ •'4.5'4•# `'6a 9 5 _541911 _•535 53 7 _ _ •__� 16 e ass - `as as 1 a as.z _ are 2 x15.5x 91121152x11 453 °529 - 3=8483 ' _ _a .874 _ _ 2 _ _ - •? 3e _ n _ 522 _ _ _ 1 1 1 _x8 _•911 _ _ _9 2+3x•4 "' 4155191991112999x9522299 111$*3•�4 O QOf ti _ 1 99x9 d a' 1 " •a e J . 9 -w.Fa -a9 -e .g.g •c•@•'a a -99.11 ax _8a~x4439 - .g NB 8= 1943177: . _ 1311.93x2 _ a1 11 __ _ _ _^_ . _2 23= 4839 " d11xx1125x51522295595225 °9151 I- 559x1 115959x55 9.93 a 4552 _+� .811.4.4 -311 _ 6 •� _ ,y N - - " -+3 951 x•91251 - "aa a ^ a a 9a - 3 a _ _ •' 9 - -5 2 .;2955111332x1 11151111922 e111t4`fl2 N (n Z 911x9 129995x111 3 1339- 1 as 4 _ x14255 •- - 1- 8 a1- _ _374^-= __ _ _ .4 _111 _ _8• x 853 x -'`-' - 2'9 _'`�'� •5.3`1 111 2 23.92 °1539• 9.931 " •' _ 81x8734 31 _ 4 719 23��89a89 = 1 9 _ _ 1 x 9 _ , 2 3.9x•5 x•4.3 _1 111 ax115332x512229x1511155 a 151 O W 5 _�-a 8d 1 „ sss� .n.nx� -.� 3 . SL'J'.9 9 844<_ as _ 9 .a s _,� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ x71199 -= a - x 91 •„ •^ " +` < '6•' •98897 ^8 1.31x9 1x55525159221 °5x1151 z = v 1111129 •922211551 x13354 ., 1 112- a _ » s8 1 ge8 .px -",88 '6 "114 a 7 + •6992 _x317 ra3+3.31 4x3522 1511x129512555155111 2 211 x _ _ 7.38 ' 1x5512 --5215552x3 51135.9.9x1 " 9 _ - x ' 9182 d 52•#8 _ 2 _ x4_919755 _ d': _ =_8 .aJ 8a _ - x 1 +a ^_•9•a xa•9 4.9+3.3•a 135555 i81553x119x2155.4.4.45x � 55.51x5 -235211112 11211x315 ` 19 1 _ - 1 1 - = 111 - 1x•4121a5-51159511 55514 x xax x 421 _ _ _ 33^=81 s 2291 5 _ 2 2x911:5 " 2 1 1x•9 .= d1 a-aa - 55 43111 1252.9 ' 1d 2152221115111111 s• ' 511x22 -59211525.5x11.91 1 •' 1a• 834 x 1s a _ "59438.99 111 158344 -+°32 - s-x�4.x 125129 '•P _ 1.5 _•^_a•4 xa a a - -• 1'9" -x2<d 1 •`a -•9.98 2222 xx511112.9.51151x1 ti _ _ _ _912111911535x- 11158 7888' 11 1a xs44/J.„ a"8=1d 5.42x1 11 1x91112- area 2 •68383x 8 311 x11 • 44292 - 15 1483 2222 3 1x5111112 2511x1 0 111122 229222 1 1 s axe 717»6. .e c8a 8 _ . 894x9 _ . - �s 11,38 _ 121 x 33 3 23 3519 x55 2 1.4 88 _ ? -4+9.9.4 x 9 - a x51.37 i _ 11x115 4 152x15911 5x1555 0 351295 °15552292111 "•4111534x1; 1n 3339 - - 48sa -1116° 119 _ _ _ _ _ s a._ 1Ixxx 13x115 . "=5321112x21 -511551 1.9x922 22222222212912225111511 111 F . x95 _ _ = 5 39x51 .' -5 •6 -11 2 8 - -29 _ , _ _ _ _- 81 3 55 511 25 233 x111 1x2 _ 22991x ' are9x.6.2 11599 '111 1 1 32 1 •4x11911 e5225559x159122xx3111<22 Baa _ " 711 _ _ a - 15"112 119 ' -1x912.4511 155 111 2 2119252 5x19 „ x 11x' a _ x•�x _ _ _ - - 5x2521 -•921111911191.4 1 _ _111 3811 - '328.9 '-� � - 'x11 1.9125x5 11 1 11x1 1-913x1 111 X42 _915x22 531112911a 19 •° 88388 a 31221x31 21135952221 °5.4.4511 u� •8x9921 -•919112335 3315x11 7 x913737 _ _ re - _ 16113x22 _912 -52 -9419 33332x112 -a9 •411 9x1^=8 a •91255x1135212.42xx512xxx1551555 -5511x1 o 29x1iii 11 52xx315x 94881 74 W7 - 753 _- -5 191x13.93 1 1 1 6x32119_2_ -12 1_5_9_ _99x1 155223559 122° 1 .a 71.3x1 58 = 1129 1121 55113212229911122991591195-51511x15 �+ •e e5�25 3915319 ' _ 53x35 x93=335 - .aa -48 -^' 9'"25x11 x1233533 d '- 1 111=•9.39 •s 11.5111 "x332522222551592112_2_1_•922_1_111x155 0 . J a -xa b '4.91 112 °1 all x95219 1x131 11522 2.93838 � 1 - x.ga -a.- x 124111 32x521523 1111191 s --51•�32•�12s 29 2°22 912 1 3 _ _ I� y � "1x11.48• _3_83 _ _ x15 9311262x2393 13 55115�11a aaaaifl�x� e229 p•a -qs1 '9221 1�3 1x111 1 d ra '"3=1. a r.01x _AA.99.4• x• x2233 x•922.2 11522•s•92w22��a��$� 3NIl Hal V o 3NIl H�1dW x52222 2x531 1121 A a ssa3 _1 ss 1 112 "_ _ .58 9199 1 0 21 xa a +• -.;8. » 11132 511191 3352 33 3312x27( �5 X91 Wills x11 1152 "111x12 " - - 2 9 4 _ 111 x•5112 321152912222°22111.4x155 121522 1113111 - 52151 1 1 saaaa 1 2 " _ _ x -253 521 '119 391 522 111152 $F 229 - 2 2212 a.•4 31x99-84'3x1 X1132123 , 113x12a11555151x1155x x•91122 515x521 =5155x9 9 71 9•s x12 a - x_259 2x31 111 22x5 29 11x12.9 2ht'@151 _ B11 n 556 12111494868x87 "a " 4132x2 8 _1.9311211992111 115511 ,dri_' 1 225921 29122531 1 35211x14 - 1=va a9 1 a _ _ V I1V.WY VCL O i NOWT&Y OF I NOW ORY"FeLV © c ^OO FRANK YACWNCMCK 1901.44' (DEED) 1904.80' (ACTUAL) N 538'3 240'5020"E E ((DAEED) W w S38' ' " CTUAL) ) �-''�� m F. �� a g IS O / p 4 p y EE A " R1 ET A ie ,p 1• 1■ i• , le 4 J' O N■V/TN■PI6YCF GREAT PECONIC BAY QC O (,T / 9 g a IY 110N O W bM0 iar""`".FAM L W / 22 7 r _ y to NOW gRYFALY aF n r^ / S37'04'40'E 273.6 ' = mxTjFOF 9CUTMOD KEY MAP Qx j V O y SCALE,T-Os MILE Y 11 0 • •V \ Itw1,BW rj Iwo J u A A • eFL x° _EA O FOR "o L).00, BE1—:i37-04!40 E • " „ ` � e a '•0, ,��— N �95 GRIPPING STREET ® P N D ■ ® , EN p t v _ ) ASF—SF�'P / O `\ \ ✓ �Y'\' r OI > 4P AY"`A k WWAY F. HEANLYm–J aL a 'y D SeE' -s P D ` �L � ET JNOWORCAYBrOHAIR POND v " t ym S37-13.30"E (DEED) ri " �1 / Q g ■ • ��'S� .pb NOW/FORMERLY MM. 0 S37'04' 0"E CTU 221.47' ARM M. ■T b ° /�..� ■ 6>a / , b N37'13'30"W 400.00' k b+ ) J /141 E O b •P EE NOW/FORYA C C 11101 PRLY OF - -G Tb - - -- 11 } O O 0 / F \ • r SAO=FWURCHH OFF G ■ a b c 1 \ -- - - � rY i O � / °• A 1 tl \\ O ART // A • � T` A J1 IBNGNO=0 NNEYAROF OS WD 0 in 74 ow - b 1 p A ex A °°. QQ • �\ e A •e w A I " wo IPEI [ N36'54'200W 2009.51' (DEED)now�x M.1X of xow/PGNYFnLr of 2009.22' (ACTUAL) a AMID a LauwE //FFppIp�Li NOW//FFpppHYFALY OF COOK, LY W NOW/FORNERLY OF NOW/FppYFALY OF PAUL IL 11 NOWSTA9UNINIC7. 0 HI�L�D D R� I W I k DAVID DONNA EL I NO l�DISMIEL RANCIS G OF I . I O YRR09NOLY. I I I HENRY k OEBpiAH I a I NOW/F Of JOHNR W N W ml LEGEND —SF— SILT FENCE CONSMUCRON FENCE PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION PROPOSED STABIUZED CONSTRUCTON ENTRANCE e UW/.00■ IEAe®A■P910MFEEe COA•@!I■ GUS 6 712M t✓tIMAS PRAMEYI GFRGANSD gYFI'BIDAT®d"E 20011 COMENIS FBI i 4 510107 REU®F!ONVDOT M a W12210 ASMEDQABHWGEMPERCL@D BJR 2 IW2DW R•V®Nr6RBCCNt00MB6B LCURBI 1 DJIMIe■ Rit®uYdDPBi CLBR - GNIIIM - 0e/2Ma eABYH®NTOYM aP DOUM1KMD _ tii . N° DATE lemm No GRAPHIC SCALE EROSION CONTROL, PLAN �ft & . 10 0 50 IW Zee wD THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE W/05 61711471513 AT CHKV BY, am CUTCHOGUE DATE ,ro/D5 TAI 'ET TOWN OF SOOTHOLp. aui=P LK,O UN . NEW YORK pIBTRICT 1000. 9EOTON lam. E3L_OOK al. LOT 33.3 im NO; 0002 NOTE: pp THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE NELSON' f.7f. POPE cACo, PROPERTY OF NELSON k POPE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR CAOR ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION ENGINEEAMROA SURVEYORS 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS 572 -66115WALTAXI 0427-SMVELE,ICIII- 47-2M8 T (630427-6885 FAX(88q 4275820wMTndwnpq+awW 61ig75 23oF 27 V8LL BE PROSECUTED. - - Y MINIMUM LENGRL WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 1/2 OF 2" x 4" GAUGE, MAX. 6' MESH SPACING) CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE MANUFACTURED OF �O SAO OR 38" MIN. FENCE z" x 4" ALTmxATE WEIGHT AX CEN. TO CEN, POSTS, .RIVEN MIN. POLYETHYLENE OR POLYPROPYLENE GR A NOMINAL r SUN 10' M 1" x 2 . FENCULARE MESH OPENING OF NO GREATER THAN CLOTH 16' INTO GROUND R x 2 . FENCE SHALL BE 48" HIGH AND SUPPLIED IN Calx ROLLS OF AT LEAST SD' IN LENGTH. COLOR SHALL BE 'INTERNATIONAL ORANGE". •'s ?,: Y' x a' SPACER �W 7 10' MAX72' MIN. FENCE A..b MIRE MESH oy i . CEN. TO INLET' . - CEN. POSTS DRIVEN MIN. \To PIPE]PIPE1 �`�\ 24' INTO GROUND \\ \\ �. C�- \ LL la 1 \��i//fes.✓ / ! '��i- aD O` m CIDPERSPECTIVE VIEW a z" H'r„174 .Se4�G / WOVEN WIRE FENCE 1/2 36 MIN. i GA. MIN., MAX. 6' MESH FENCE POSTS 2" X 4" ANCHORS SPACING) WITH FILTER //. CLOTH OVER OR PERSPECTIVE VIEW PREFABRICATED SILT FENCE EXCAVATEDEXCAVATED AREA AS IiEaUIRFD) -� APPROVED EQUAFENCE OR o UNDISTURBED 2" s Fl.OW � GROUND 72' MIN. + FENCE POSTS ' -' 9 EMBED FILTER CLOTH z CONSTRUCTION MIN. 8' INTO GROUND FENCE I / m zSTANDARD SYMBOL IXm bEPm CAVAI . CLEARED / MIN 1' -MAK Y AREA iO UNDISTURBED / aF1aW TOP of IN GRAVEI. - SUPPORTED BY Sf'7 / WEEP Hoes FOR HARDWARE CLOTH 'm ALLOW SECTION GROUND C107H - / DEWATERING MOVVEEMEENNTAND, Rk:TRICT SEDIMENT MESH / . CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR FABRICATED SILT FENCE STANDARD SYMBOL 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO 8E FASTENED SECURELY POSTS: STEEL EITHER T OR U % 4.. � TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES. TYPE OR 2" HARDWOOD CONSTRUCTION FENCE DETAIL 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE: WOVEN WIRE, 14 1/2 GA. - WITH TIES SPACED 6" MAIL MESH OPENING WOVEN WIRE FENCE _ EVERY 2e AT TOP AND MID SECTION. NOT TO SCALE 2" X 4' SPACER EXCAVATED DROP INLET PROTECTION 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH FILTER L1.01H: FILTER X, scale: NJ- ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER- MIRAFI 100X, ST•ABI- CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR PLASTIC FLORESCENT ORANGE FENCE UPPED BY six INCHES AND FOLDED. EQUAL OR APPROVED NOTES CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS - 1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE CONSTRUCTION FENCE IN LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE DRAWINGS 4. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS PREFABRICATED UNIT: GEOFAB, AND SPECIFICATIONS SAL MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES CURB GUTTER INLET PROTECTION STRUCTURE 7 CLEAR THE AREA OF ALL DEBRIS THAT WILL HINDER EXCAVATION. NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED EATEN ENNROFENCE, OR APPROVED 2 GRADE APPROACH TO THE INTEL UNIFORMLY AROUND THE BASIN. BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. EQUAL 3. WEEP HOLES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY GRAVEL SILT FENCE DETAIL _ 2) THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE CONSTRUCTION FENCE IS RR CLEARLY NATURAL A CONSTRUCTION AREA saALE: NM 4. UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA, SEAL WEEP HOLES AND PROVIDE SOME MEASURE OF PROTECTION FOR THE SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS ITT NOT DESIGNED FILL BASIN WITH STABLE SOIL TO FINAL GRADE, COMPACT IT PROPERLY OR INTENDED TO BE AN IMPENETRABLE BARRIER TO THOSE INTENT ON ENTERING THE CONSTRUCTION 517E INSTALLATION CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND STABILIZE WITH PERMANENT SEEDING. NOT TO SCALE 1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL HAVE AN EOS OF 40-85. MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA 1 ACRE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED BY WEAVING FENCE POSTS VERTICALLY THROUGH AT LEAST THREE 2. WOODEN FRAME SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 2" X 4" CONSTRUCTION (3) MESH OPENINGS (TOP, MIDDLE AND BOTTOM OF FENCE) AND DRIVING POSTS WITH A 3LB. HAND DRILLING GRADE LUMBER. HAMMER (OR EQUIVALENT) FLUSH WITH THE TOP OF FENCING. POSTS SHALL BE AT AN INTERVAL OF NO 3. WIRE MESH ACROSS THROAT SHALL BE A CONTINUOUS PIECE 30 INCH GREATER THAN TEN FEET. FENCING SHALL BE SECURED FIRMLY TO EACH POST AT THE TOP, BOTTOM AND MINIMUM WIDTH WITH A LENGTH 4 FEET LONGER THAN THE THROAT. MID-POINT WITH WIRE REBAR TIES. WHERE LENGTHS OF FENCING ARE JOINED, A POST SHALL BE WOVEN THROUGH IT SHALL BE SHAPED AND SECURELY NAILED TO A 2" X 4" WEIR: BOTH FENCE SECTIONS AT THE JOINT, WITH TIES FASTENING BOTH FENCE SECTIONS TO THE POST. FENCING SHALL 4. THE WEIR SHALL BE SECURELY NAILED TO 2" X 4" SPACERS BE STRETCHED AS TAUT AS PRACTICAL BETWEEN FENCE POSTS WITHOUT INORDINATELY DEFLECTING POSTS. 9 INCHES LONG SPACED NO MORE THAN 6 FEET APART. TOE-OF-SLOPE 2"x2" WOODEN OUT SLOPE OR NEW TEMPORARY OPENINGS IN CONSTRUCTION FENCE INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR ENTRY OF WORKERS, STAKE OR #5 ENBANKMENT MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT. SUCH OPENINGS SHALL BE SECURED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY IN THE 5. THE ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PLACED AGAINST THE INLET AND SECURED L REBAR (SLOPE VARIES) MANNER AFOREMENTIONED FOR JOINING FENCE SECTIONS. BY 2" X 4' ANCHORS 2 FEET LONG EXTENDING ACROSS THE TOP OF THE INLET AND HELD IN PLACE BY SANDBAGS OR ALTERNATE WEIGHTS /� EXISTING POSTS: STEEL EITHER T OR U MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA 1 ACRE SEDIMENT o BOUND GROUND TYPE OR 2" HARDWOOD CONTAINMENT 1n HAY BALE FLOW AREA 2"x2' STAKES, -_-._ 1" X 4" WOOD FRAME 2-PLR BALE DRIVE w -r- , STAKES FLUSH i ME DUST CONTROL NOTES MA STAKED h BUTTED NOT TO SCALE PLAN HAY a LES END, BEDDING DETAIL ON CONTOURS DEFINITION 1� _ The control of dual resulting from land-disturbing activities. BOUND HAY ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARD ga(E 'PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE PURPOSE -= OxY WOODEN To prevent surface and air movement of dust from disturbed soil surfaces that may cause off-site 50' MIN. - STAKE OR //5 _ damage, health hazards, and traffic safety problems. EXIST'G3. EXISTG - REBAR GROUND? .. S PVM'T 1:"- - MIN CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES e' M _ z- - srAlo On construction roads, access points, and other disturbed areas subject to surface dust movement AMAY. MO TABLE BERM and dust blowing where off-site damage may occur if duet is not controlled. FILTER CLOTH (OPTIONAL) DESIGN CRITERIA PROFILE FALL 50' MIN. ANCHORING DETAIL Construction operations should be scheduled to minimize the amount of area disturbed at one time. Buffer areas of vegetation should be left where practical. Temporary or permanent stabilization _ measures should be installed. No specific design criteria is given; see construction specifications EXISYG 2 r _ "; �' STANDARD SYMBOL w below for common methods of dust control. GROUND STAKED HAYBALE DETAIL b ROP GRATE SPECIFICATIONS :-, MTM OTE M1E FABRIC -I I I_I I II `. ODDOO NOT TO SCALE Vegetative Cover - For disturbed areas not subject to traffic; vegetation provides the most practical ? 'r;•;:;.:::•;:•:;::;; :;:::•;.:;::fir ,'r;•; :•'.':�;:::'.:•: - . method of dust control. Temporary seeding shall be as follows: .•n- a) Rye Grass (Annual or Perennial) at 30 HIS. per acre (0.7 lbs/1000 SF) PLAN VIEW 8 b BURIED FABRIC Certified "Aroostook' Winter Rye (Cereal Rye) at 100 HIS. per acre (2.5 lbs/SF) = B = Use Winter Rye if seeding In October/November. 1• STONE SIZE - USE 2" STONE, OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. j� GATHER Mulch (including gravel mulch) - Mulch offers a fast effective means of controlling dust. 2. LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET EXCESS AT CORNERS 1' MIN a 9/0/1110e IEYwl�bF910MFr®CaNR3116 fAf ,Spray Adhesives - Examples of spray adhesives for use On mineral soils are shown In the following 3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES. - - e >•Mro �ASIBLIEw PlrvtoRPremT� R� nBe _ table: 4. WIDTH - TWELVE (12 FOOT MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT -III-I 4 SM/W FLV® IMM I® e Material Water nn Type-of Apply POINTS WHERE INGR� OR EGRESS OCCURS. a 03122M7 am NO?21e Gallons/Aare FILTER FABRIC DROP INLET PROTECTION 2 w2vol FR" m1e101�"'�'�` UM Acrylic Polymer 9:1 Course Spray 500 5. FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR 10 PLACING z alMlae IEV�Nr9YaMPERCDYIBl1e- LIDVRIB ' yl• ym P Y OF STONE. SCALE. rvTs Latex Emulsion 12.5:1 Fine Spray 235 CONSTRUCTION SPEGFIGATONS r +11a•1os I�urourEel cLar swa 6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CON- 1, FILTER FABRIC SHALLHAVE AN EOS OF 40-85. BURLAP MAY alevoe eIMYn®IOTOWNOFBaIII11GL0 eA Resin In Water 4:1 Fine Spray 300 STRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS USED BE FOR SHORT TERM APPLICATIONS. bare eEWlbN GIN IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL. BE PERMITTED. xn 2 CUT FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL TO ELIMINATE JOINTS. IF Water quality should be considered when materially are selected for dual control. 7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH JOINTS ARE NEEDED THEY WALL BE OVERLAPPED TO THE NEXT STAKE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS °W"''BY' J)" WILL PREVENT ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED.TRACKING FLOWING W OF SERI RACIER ONTO PUBLIC RIG RIGHTS- AY 3. STAKE MATERIALS WILL BE EVENLY WILL BE STANDARD V X 4" WOOD OR EQUIVALENT. DEIGH.15111 SJR Sprinkling - The site may be sprayed until the surface is wet. This is especially effective on haul OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. METAL WITH A MINIMIM LENGTH OF 3 FEET. HERITAGE L �'E� n� � roads and access routes. & WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED. IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED TWTH 4. SPACE STAKES EVENLY AROUND INLET 3 FEET APART AND DRIVE A THE HEfll l AV7G AT CV 1 CHOWE DA76 VO/OS STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO H APPROVED ON AN4 TRAPPING LIZEDEVICE. MINIMUM 18 INCHES DEEP. SPANS GREATER THAT 3 FEET MAY BE BRIDGED 1TaraAt®wtr±� Stone used for construction roads is also effective for duet control. WITH THE USE OF WINE MESH BEHIND THE FILTER FABRIC FOR SUPPORT. CV ECHOWE �D� � DATE; 1M/05 9• PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER 5. FABRIC SHALL BE EMHEDDED 1 FOOT MINIMUM BELOW GROUND AND BACK FILLED. IT SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE STAKES AND FRAME TOWN OP e30LITHOLO, E2UFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK Barriers - A fence or similar barrier can control air currents a4 Intervals equal to fifteen times the EACH RAIN., oys;,-rPyycr ToOo. esECT'1oE.T Toz, 6T_OGK oT, LOT• ayay.3 JOBNa• 0002 barrier height. Preserve existing wind barrier vegetation as much as practical. 6. A 2" X 4" WOOD FRTME SHALL BE COMPLETED AROUND THE CREST NOTE= _ STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OF THE FABRIC FOR OVER FLOW STABILITY. THESE PIANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE NELSON 8L( POPE FNe MAINTENANCE MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA ACRE PROPERTY OF NELSON d< POPE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR CAOD 0002ti8P ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS Maintain duet control measures through dry weather periods until all disturbed areas are stabilized. NOT TO SCALE 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS 572 LWALTWHI MAN ROAD,MAM^F NLY.1747-21811 8CAL6 r-Im WILL BE PROSECUTED. (620427.6666 FAX(620427-5620 wwwxgaipapecom lslEER 22A OF 27 A�Y+GL R lip4 O ESTA 6rAlE W NOW/FOpYFRLY BF FRANK IMCNNCNICK BERIFIA MIROIIWMU 1901.44' (DE ) � S38'30'50"E (DEED) 190 .80' AC L) \ a 4 S3B'24'20"E (ACTUAL) 2 (Zi• z +7 �+� WATER WELL LOCATION AS PER W OFFAY PEoSxlc wAY Q � '� za 6 'fin £� S.C.D.H.S. OFFICE OF WATE ti c Q 0 Ot m � „i 3z RESOURCES, VERIFY IN Fl FYFMr 0' -- %� _ 2z �1� N Y W 3 SCALE f OS MILE 2 20 p lNit dAFNI r. N M1ry y to 2 ry OF 3 O NOW CF Saunta n 24 � .fJ 1 2 M1 2? 28 ze\ 22 z 24 �24 zz N � ati TH 3 3 3 \? 40 H \3 D'N"FFING STREET d J N �_ Y 1 N w TH#5 3 22 A NOW/FORMERLY OF J 'TH# nifT w e+ \ ! WAY F. HEANEY O 34 y m WED J� Cl O •(Y�• 2J V \ f z � 3713' "E ?DEED) No1Y S 7 A 7' N37*13'30'W 4 .Op' AN OF W J z� �ry NW/NCErRxIIXY OF0 00 O HU °F > xOFr /M I ' TH#6 g z TH#8 BORING 06 y Now ERLr of au TH# •,,\ GRADE 0.0' TOPSOIL ERA34 4 BORING #7 GRADE BORING 08LONG IN a r 32 3: - O.O' TOPSOIL EL 35.0 0.0 TOPSOIL EL 32.25 SILTY LOAMSILTY LOAM, ACE - - SILTY LOAM - GRAYISH BROWN SILT (SM) M - 'O COURSE TO FINE BROWN - COURSE TO FINE BROWN _ N o - - COURSE TO FINE BROWN N ac LIGRAVERL, OCCASIONAL OWN SAND D LIGHT OCCASIONAL On D o a - LIGHT BROWN SAND AND 5.O LARGE GRAVEL (SW) �W - COURSE TO FINE BROWN -5'O, LARGE GRAVEL (SW) -5.0' GRAVEL (SW) m LIGHT BROWN SAND AND COURSE TO FINE BROWN \ - - AND LIGHT AND GRAVELOW(SW)ND - GRIAVEL, THIN LAYER OF SILT (SP/SM) `^ 36' 0"W Now�aRu Y 34 2009.51' (DEED) " - COURSE TO FINE BROWN - - N tEXISTING BE NOw/TONEmLO 20.22' (ACTU -1O 0' AND LIGHT BROWN SAND NOW/FGWERLYOFN �CONL Y NOW/FpiMDO.Y OF NOWiFONYERLY OF A� ! • PAUL W!CONCErIA "°°� °ILY RF O AND GRAVEL (SW) -1O.O' -1O.O' XINOANO ROAD CORP. wD A. NOw LY OF KDSIIY, ENBRD9EY, Jt STASIUKIENIOL , !LIMITING Rt .' ZeD NAN. PRMiGR•d STANLEY 4L STANLEY 111. PRIVRTE xETIRr!DEBORAH NOW/PoRMFRLY OF -15.0 aa\ J !MARE a 750' SANITARY RADIUS WATER WELL &I� _ -15.0' -15.0' O FROM CENTER OF (TYPICAL FOR 11) > - - 0. W (TYPICAL FOR 11) U) - - J Ir m _ -20.0' -20.0' -20.0' -25.0' -25.0' -25.0' END OF BORING 25' O" NO WATER ENCOUNTERED END OF BORING 25' 0" END OF BORING 25' 0" TEST BORINGS BY NO WATER ENCOUNTERED NO WATER ENCOUNTERED SLACKE TEST BORING TEST BORINGS BY TEST BORINGS BY 12/5/06 SLACKE TEST BORING SLACKE TEST BORING 12/5/06 12/5/06 BORING #1 GRADE BORING #2 GRADE BORING 03GRADE BORING *4GRADE BORING #5GRADE 0.0' SILTY TOPSOIL i EL 34.3 0.0 SANDY TOPSOIL EL 23.9 0.0' TOP st SOIL EL 34.2 0.0' TOPSOIL EL 34.6 0.0' SILTY TOPSOIL EL 2x3.5 SILTY LOAM y _ COURSE TO FINE BROWN _ SILTY LOAM - SILTY LOAM - 1111 SAND, SOME SILT, SOME SILTY LOAM _ GRAVEL SM - _ - COURSE TO FINE BROWN COURSE TO FINE BROWN COURSE 10 FINE BROWN COURSE TO FINE BROWN - COURSE TO FINE BROWN OWNER: APPLICANT: LIGHT BROWN SAND AND - AND LIGHT BROWN SAND - AND LIGH1 BROWN SAND LIGHT BROWN SAND AND SAND AND GRAVEL, GRAVEL, OCCASIONAL AND GRAVEL (SW) -5 0. AND GRAVEL (SW) -cJ 0' GRAVEL, OCCASIONAL -cJ O' OCCASIONAL LARGE NOCRO, LTD. THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE, LLC -5.0 LARGE GRAVEL (SW) -5.0 LARGE GRAVEL (SW) GRAVEL (SP/SW) 140 EAST MAIN ST. 1721-D NORTH OCEAN AVENUE GRAPHIC SCALE - - - - - D NY 901 3 wo - COURSE TO FINE BROWN - - - COURSE TO FINE BROWN a 9Awsaol �t®w•FettNUPFaW °'� ion 0 fio tab �o AND LIGHT BROWN SAND - - COURSE TO FINE BROWN - AND LIGHT BROWN SAND AND GRAVEL (SW) - AND LIGHT BROWN SAND AND GRAVEL (SW) A Swim It}+®FnReoeET HISS _ - AND GRAVEL (SW) ( LII FEET ) 3 001PR/07 NEMWDtlIIexOI�Ai FEIt ClBlr elx -10.0' -10.0' -10.0' -10.0' -10.0' Loom N t viwm -15.0' -15.0' -15.0 Ri1FEDLAYpRFENCLtExr -15.0' -15.0 ael2wa es.N®m aYNaPKo,RNDa au m_ Na DAZE NEmm EP 0 GROUND WATER -17.6' = EL 6.3 - - - TEST BORING LOCATIONS DWN BY. .N .� BM FAIR N _ THE HERffAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE ' -20.0' -20.0' -20.0' -20.0' FwRXMY AT CFN'DBY FAM -ZO.O -25.D' -25.0' -25.0' -ZS.O' TOWN OF eOLATHO CUTCHOGUE CHOY7VE UIV 1Y. NE=W YORK DATFS 1M/03 NOTE -25.0 GROUND WATER -25.6' EL 8.6 END OF BORING 25' 0" END OF BORING 25' On Ot8TF11CT IOC)O, 8EGTION ,ox. 9a ocK w, LOT aaa "Nov 0002 a9 END OF BORING 25' 0" �_� NO WATER ENCOUNTERED NO WATER ENCOUNTERED _ 9 THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE AND ARE THE NO WATER ENCOUNTERED = PROPERTY OF NELSON & POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR TEST BORINGS BY TEST AORINGS BY TEST BORINGS BY TEST BORINGS BY NELSON & POPE ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION TEST BORINGS BY 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS SLACKE TEST BORING SLACKE TEST BORING SLACKE:TEST BORING SLACKE TEST BORING SLACKE PEST BORING ENCd1NEERS • SURVEYORS CAM9 WILL BE PROSECUTED. 12/7/06 12/7/06 12/7/06 12/5/06 12/5/06 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVLUE NY 11747-M 8C� T'�' 0 (530427-5595 FAX(WO427-5= wNumbe pope== ffffR 1ACIFT/ _n ALM N Yhll. ,1p0 t SFIItl1 G OOO a �Y 3 I f oa � /�q NOW MEALY OF \ �° FRMKSMA HI K BEN URC2EWEI(I H a B / 1 \ CHEAT PEGOMC BAY �t 1901).44' (DE ) f 190,4.80�(AC 538'30'50"E (DEED) — — �. — ` 1\jam UJ', KEY MAP 538'24'20"E (ACTUAL) — — — j `-- � aA � scALr�r-D.5 titlLe N N a 41� 10; Y 'iSri D 'd I HaA HcA o (r1 aNR�+A.uA T. UT 3°\ H a A � — — — — — ' —Yzc —_ '26 /��� RdB H a A \ ° 37 04�" _ 7_ 7 — — _Tow �J,HGL +� NOW ERLY OF \I'�\2 � 2 zs` \ 2 > ,C24� — \ \ H a A ," � 0 1/ �2,— ; \ °° —24— f / —_ \ —26— 1\ 16 t111 V '140 2i���\ = = / \ xG RdB NN GRIFFING STR�L RdB ME NWMY U a PIC / � � I I I RdB \�VO OU �` \ WILLIAM M. BEEBE -- \ k WLUAM F. HEANEY — O � I 537'13'�WE (DEED) \ \ — V NOW T of \ FINQ ACTUAL 221.47' R d g \ / \ \ 37'1:{'30"W 40\0.00' y \ 1 RdB \ I '���µ��\ \ SACRED MEART\ RdB � ` � PICNRdB 32 LONGISUNO WNEY ,�, \ \ — 1 PIC � 3`— \ \ HaA i \ gym HaA�� N°wi9ARMEI(Lr of "ate 2009.51' (DEED)) ALooNtlSlA,laJUISE NOW/FdU1ERLY OF 2009.22' ACTU Q / NLbVFrMEHLY OF \ /Fpp \ SHE�Y NOW/FONMERLY OF ry \w NOW/FORMEALY OF \~ �s\ \ \ COON, �— NOWFORBMSKY. OF NOW/FdtR Y OF v, PAUL M. Q CIXICETIA ASIUKIEWICI, " _ NO A. NOW�FAtMERLr OF I BEM9 \ I I HAIRY Q DEBMM I I NOWIFORMERLM OF \ \p I HICHLANO ROAD CORP. P \ Q OAWS L STANIEY JR STANLEY JR w ` i MOHRING RT. +s Z h 0 NA M. FRANCJS A \j \ \ Ii MARIE C. WAflACElL6 JCHN J, ISABEL En W m l LEGEND SOIL SUITABILITY NOTES: ® DENOTES AREAS EOUE' AL TO OR CHEATER THAN 15X SLOP (EXCERPTS TAKEN FROM SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY SOIL SURVEY) GENERAL NOTES: L. 1. (HRA) HAVEN LOAM, 0 TO 2% SLOPES - THIS SOIL IS WELL SUITED TO ALL CROPS COMMONLY DENOTES BOUNDARY OF SOA- TYPES' 1. THERE ARE NO EXISTING BUILDINGS LOCATED ON THE PROJECT SITE. GROWN IN THE COUNTY. BECAUSE OF THE NEARLY LEVEL SLOPE AND EASE OF EXCAVATION, US DEPT OF AGRICULTURE) 2. THERE ARE NO WETLANDS LOCATED ON THE PROJECT SITE, BASED ON INFORMATION FROM THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE - WETLANDS INVENTORY SOUTHOLD MOST AREAS OF THIS SOIL IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE COUNTY ARE BEING USED FOR HDUSING DEVELOPMENTS AND INDUSTRIAL PARKS. QUAD SHEET AND NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CAPABILITY UNIT I-1; WOODLAND SUITABILITY GROUP 301. FRESH WATER WETLANDS.. 2. (HRB) HAVEN LOAM, 2 TO 6% SLOPES - THIS SOIL IS WELL SUITED TO ALL CROPS COMMONLY GRAPHIC SCALE 3. THERE ARE NO FLOOD PRONE AREAS LOCATED ON THE PROJECT SITE, BASED ON GROWN IN THE COUNTY: IT IS GENERALLY FAMED THE SAME AS ADJOINING AREAS EAS OF DATA FROM FEMA Q3 FLOOD DATA DISC 20 -NEW YORK EAST, SEPTEMBER 1996. W +ns/zaa Ew6E0 AW PBi DAA r B°wLWeAs an c 60 100 209 400 4. THE FOLLOWING SOILS ARE LOCATED ON THE PROJECT SITE BASED ON DATA FROM NEARLY LEVEL SOILS. MOST AREAS IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE COUNTY ARE USED FOR a T/zm I�WeE�AeE�IEreMaFe� eEnon�EEleoAT� NE zoa�LWe4�B ree HDUSING DEVELOPMENTS. CAPABILITY UNIT IIe-1; WOODLAND SUITABILITY GROUP 3o1. THE U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE: 3. (HC) PLYMOUTH LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 15% SLOPES - THIS SOIL IS NOT WELL SUITED TO CROPS 4 6w/m E�FaAao�r RES a HRA - HAVEN LOAM, 0 TO 2% SLOPES ODMMONLY GROWN IN THE COUNTY. MOST OF THIS SOIL IS WOODED. SMALL ACREAGES ARE O 121MIN a uWHau�AWFEWaErrt 6 " n ( IN FEET ) (HILA) o I s 12/El/oe IEMBEO AS PFii WCI»IB CgR.BAW LOU/IB (HaB) - HAVEN LOAM 2 TO 6% SLOPES CLEARED AND ARE FARMED WITH ADJOINING AREAS OF LEVEL OR GENTLY SLOPING SOILS. r PIC -PLYMOUTH LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 15 % SLOPES wl°e°e �v®ur°ur Fe c, r mom (PIC) SUCH AREAS ARE USED MAINLY FOR GROWING GRASSES, BUT SOME AREAS ARE IDLE. o O pl24la IJEMIT®TO TOYM OP B0111FIOlD °R o (RdB) -RIVERHEAD SANDY LOAM, 3 TO 8 /o SLOPES EXTENSIVE EXCAVATING IS NOT NEEDED, SOME AREAS ARE USED FOR ESTATE-TYPE HOUSING 5. THE PROJECT SITE IS CONSIDERED TO BE WITHIN AN ARCHEOLOGICAL AND DEVELOPMENTS. CAPABILITY UNIT IVs-1; WOODLAND SUITABILITY GROUP 4s1. "` °"'E ON Wn HISTORICALLY SENSITIVE AREA BASED ON DATA FROM THE NEW YORK STATE 4. (RdB) RIVERHEAD SANDY LOAM, 3 TO 8% SLOPES - THIS SOIL IS WELL SUITED TO ALL CROPS EXISTING RESOURCES AND SITE ANALYSIS PLAN DW"'Br. im HISTORIC PRESEVATION OFFICE.. COMMONLY GROWN IN THE COUNTY, AND IT IS USED MAINLY FOR THIS PURPOSE. MOST AREAS Com By. Bill6. METES & BOUNDS, ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION, IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE COUNTY, HOWEVER, ARE USED FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE: +m1O5 N AND LOCATION OF EXISTING PRIVATE WATER WELLS OBTAINED AND AS INDUSTRIAL SITES. CAPABILITY UNIT IIe-2; WOODLAND SUITABILITY GROUP 301. CUTCHOAT GUE CNK'D 9Y &M FROM PLANS BY HENDERSON & BODWELL CONSULTING DATE 1M/05 ENGINEERS, DATED 7-24-1987. rowN OF 90UTMiOLO. SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK NOTE oLs rr�icr 1000, SECTION 102. BLOCK Ol, LOT 33.3 'IBN0.. 000'2 THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERWCE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF NELSON & POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR NELSON POPE FA ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION .�+DI"IS� $1 '(1�rJ OADD 000289P o 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS SC.IM*�_�2��, .3 ENGINEERS A SURVEYORS SCALB s0i WILL RE PROSECUTED. (63I)427W5666T5 FAX (6 �5620 W miff m�-� T-pD ib °RP°PW SHEET 250E 27 n i STA 8450 � m STA. 7450 20' Hid 20' APPROACH SLAB EPO%Y COATED APPROACH SLAB WEDDED WIRE FABRIC 42' HIGH DEDORATVE RNUNG 4" % 4" W4% W4 AS DIRECTED BY OWNER 100F9•ft FOR DECK ) SYSTEM 1 PROP. ROADWAY S LOPE R ¢¢ ROADWAY MIRAFl N FILTER FABRIC ASPHALT ROAD II PER (EYP.) ASPHALT ROAD AS PER TOWN SPEgFlCATONs TOWN SPECIFICATIONS : ..r.•2i. — — _:•.`x;k'1tiH_ — — — k- . I- S•OMAIN� 31.15 I I 0.78 O AS eO SHOEP PM � HO O AS SSHHOWNLLs �--WELL GRADED I I SAND GRAVEL I I g HW 24.0 $ HW 24.0 STAMPED CONCRETE NTNG WALL I I I STAMPED CONCRETE PATTERNS SPECIFIED BY OWNER I I I I WING WALL PATTERNS SPECIFIED BY OWNER I I r - - -I F -1 I I I i- -L rL _L _ _ I II IJMEit-y 24 INV 17.0 24• INV i].tl RCP BO EMC-OOF PONO„� RCI LINER TOP FOUNDATION USHD STONE GUAM GRAVEL) SECIM CII0= I740IALL SCALL I' -5' M - kTlD RATIVE RMUNG Y OWNER EPDXY COATED WELDED WRE FABRIC OPE (ASTM A-185, A-497, LATEST EDITION 4" X4' W4 % W41001 �q FOR DECK SYSTEM 9 WALNC GRA58 GRASS 'R.C. gR �`�gl - WRB p g 8' CURB WALK •a± Sj.R i0 2�T 0.5 % RC NNRE• S•PoNG SURFACE 0'5 x 2 EPDXY COATED rnd �d .,,ad;v e . ,tie ... .. .., xN• m:}vvarl WELDED ORE FABRIC ..,. ... ...,n. . M +MIRAFl 1'100 .• " 100 FR•k 42' HIGH DECORATIVE R UNG IRM N BRI 4 % 4 W4 % W4 . ' III FABRIC (EYP.) FlL1ER FABRIC (EYP.)' FOR DECK SYSTEM ( ;RELIED BY OWNER .. a ' .............:.:.........:v..::....:..:::...0.::.6.S:..v::..f.........1.:.. ........n....................................s........................ GRATE EL 29.0A OLEO 110-8 O.C. (TYPJ 77 8 HOLES "0 WATERMAINp yyNV 30.87 UWAY RCN RE S•RINO RFA 1L' 1�B2RPOOP. ROADWAY 1 29.0 T]WNASPEd TONLT ROAD AS 55 FILTER F IM1� (EYP.) �SANDlh GRAVELSTAMPED CCJCREIEWYANG WALL _PATTERNS SPECIFl D BY OWNER --�EiEUJ {'9 MEEP HOLES TOWN STEoFICCAOAD MON 5W EL 24.0 L _ _ _ J_ g__________________ „ •: GRADED Ski 6RAFE1. 4'4 WEEP HOLES OHO "ASW�WNiO 11'-8' MC. .) O AS SH HW29.0 STAMPED CONCRETE Cp STAMPED CONCRMANHOLE MPED GONCflE7E R GRAZE EL 20.0 _ _ — I _ _ _ / ' _ _ WNG WALL YANG WALL I WING WALL INV 26.0 PATTERNS SPECIFIED BY OWNER INV 27 PATTERNS SPFgFlED BY 0 ER 2f F RCP PATTERNS SPECIFIED BY OWNER UNER STATC WATER BOTTOM OF OND FL 28.0 BOTTOM OF POND L 17.0 L NV 17.0 .... 7G /MCC--CC VT EYWW1 � .................................................... ..................................... SCALE 6 WING WALL BOTCN NDATON EL8AB9 . " SM7M Q=QQE hffAQN/Al l SCALE 1' �5' 42" HIGH DECORATIVE RAILING AS DIRECTED BY OVNER (TP) WOW COATED WELDED "RE FABRIC m (AM A-185, A-497, LATEST DmON) 4" % 4" W4 K W41 0 410O FR.k g;Qv FOR DEC( SYSTEM sw 5' CORS5• CURB CRASS F. Silk' GRAM 2i � 1'�.—x RC NNRE ARING SURFACE 1.0 S ,y, , . ,.,nW.-•r.,,, ,.r;•, 6 ]/w/W IEvwED ABPBIfEwE1Y OF fEN9Eo oMFTBB DAI®JIRE¢a9E caAW1BT18 Ism PBG MIflAFl 1160 '� •. . . 'FIT IN FABRIC (TPJ'.. .• 5/G7/O/ fEVI�FOfl fw)4f ICe 4 LTER FABRIC (TYP.). .. • . ... .. _ .__,_____..-.__.__.___._.__.___._._._._.___.______________ _ STUMPED CONCRETE _1 _________________________.___...._.___ ___..._. _ _ _ : _ _._.__._...v___:_. _ __. _ _ STUMPED CONCRETE _ WHO WALL s W/22/o] IEW®CLUB HgIfE I.B P91 ttIEM &N WNG WALL TOP OF RETAININ{ WALL 30.0 2 12/21/05 IEVIBED APER BCDNB.CYX.W@TIB !.WIPES TOP OF RETAINING WALL EL 30,0 4'W WEEP HOLE ' . 4'W WEFP H01.E5 It O 11'-5. D.C. (TPJ HW a 29 n 11.4 w105/05 1EN®uraRPBI CL1ENf OR/IEB w n'-5• O.C. (Tm.) -- ------ ------------------------- an4/ae eueMFlEvroTowx aP eounTDLD all m 24"9 RCP — —WELL GRADED SAND O GRAVEL NEA xo DAM TEM ICIN BY G LINERS _ /AL1 BOTTOM OF POND EL 28.0 _ ______________________________________________________________________________ BOTTOM 28.0 / BOTTOM OF'WO EL 2t.0 L ______ _�; ________________ _________________ ___..______________________________________________ : • OWN.fiY: JM c ---------- --------- ----------- --------- HEADWALL SECTIONS Fon D8(iN El: win THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE: 1117/05Fizz . ERVATE57 AT CD" y UTCHOGUE �`D Eli SJR � DATE: 1M/05 �� TOWN OF SOUTHOLO. SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YOgK c . DISTRICT 7000, RECTION 102. BLOCK a, LOT 33.3 Joe Na 0002 $GSE ', -5' 1& POPE f4LE No: I 000268P n ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 572 WALT WMEMAN ROAD,MELVILLE,NY V747-21115 SCALE' AS SHOWN g (630 427-5555 FAX(830 427-5520 www,nelsonpope,com Si 25A OF 27 g STRUCTURE TABLE Q 0 O O OUTFALL UNITS BLDG SEPTIC TANK LEACHING OS EXP. LEACHING 601E EXP. N0. INVERT TOP INVERT INI INVERT WT POOL INV.LP. INV. POOL BOT. LP. BOT, / \ CWHISE 29.67 33.55 211.75 28.25 PI 28.15 28.03 LPI 17.15 0.03 Q O Q Q` `aa, uawm°nax. \\\ I 2 211.15 LP2 17.15 GT 29.67 33.57 29.11 28.81 �• I © \\ OO 2 2 30.1767 0.17 34.70 29.67 29.37 2837 x9.20 0.27 17.27 Ln Ln (p W W W W 3 4 29.67 35.0 29,67 29,0 29.07 28.83 17.07 10.63 Z W Z W Z W �ZI W 5 29.07 J W J W J W J Uj InID g 4 6 30.17 34.2 29.79 29.29 29.19 2919 17.19 17.19 ,_♦ = I I I� Y- 5 8 30.187 3390 29.21 28.71 211.61 20.61 18.81 18.61 U V U U Lv N 6 0 0.87 3425 29,87 29.37 29.27 29,27 17.27 0.27 NOW/FORMERLY OF ~ W � W NOW ORMERLY CF ;"' W r W 'as ESTATE OF I Q W Q W BERTHA KURCZEW9F1 Q W Q W /> / O/ 11 FRANK MACHINCHICK ` $ A O` 12 29.67 34.40 29.19 28.69 LPI 28.59 28,44 LPI 20.59 20.44 N N 1901.44' (DEED) 41 ( 7 13 LP2 28.59 LP2 20.59 \ - - - - - 1904,80_(ACTUAL) \\ 14 S38'30'50"E (DEED) N N 538'24'20°E (ACTUAL) -� , '�„v,' '-vr'v^Yw'vF O: E ONC BA O e 15 30.17 34.75 29.49 28.90 28.69 28.119 70.89 18.89 WGREAT Y O � 9 1� 2967 33.90 2925 2875 2865 2882 1665 1862 y w, v • ' •-�, A a P a nci a as a D W 10 18 29.67 34.10 29.25 28.75 28.65 28.65 16.65 1965 yy2t e P maP pRF1 PR F ta! +] FRED ISs IFL.J0.a 9 IM1-76.11 mCP 1 O� O,Q 1yJ 19 W W }'Y , E c mM ^Es ^Q a ^Fc nEa w, Pi m-n.o las m Y WATER WELL OFFICE ION AS PER KEY MAP � � ""0" r� ais" ncz" REa ""a•° PREP mo- RQ PPL•]e.0 R1nr,9 MJe.a r,0 " fMr, " R+,.]sn 9 Q �, 9 �� £� Z zo Jo.n a m E A " fi T a,o � S.C.D.H.S. OFFJCE OF WA7ER SCALE:1' -0.5 MILE 11 34.35 28.98 28.49 28.39 28.38 18.39 711.39 "°R f Pn/b'a rtL-.p.e fNJ).5 �vX] nE9. nQ ]EA 1 O O 6 fiL� 0 ` Q 21 29.8] RESOURCES, VIERIFY IN FIELD 0 rn- / o Pp.]•,9 @ e A L " Ya v " 1° PmP ___ Vl J 29.91 29,41 29.31 29.31 17.31 17.31 O Oa I �I^Jr 17 4 S 211 ss p m O o u 5 a•oe. r.ram Pn^ N✓ i 2J m p/ A` Lt YE yp "° _ O xowADawnlamr a 24 m e Y• L• � � � � •+t J wA RI naunax a)(ep O N a!MRF!d�A�aM!T. W 13 25 31.77 30.110 30.71 30.21 30.11 30.11 111.11 18.11 • •Iw+ °Kw xrAN , !r W, N 26 30.1] In /• •µ Nom, n _x8"ir nJ •V FI+°M • •Ao a NOW/FORMERLY OF 14 33.55 29.19 2889 28.59 28.59 18.59 16.59 o ""0P J0 TH ff4 ® © " fi' wW] 17.511, \ " • 53704'40"E 273.68' O WAN OF muTxaD x] 29.87 (..i 'n'a / •.•P,a A n o J •s • 7'a'4tr • D R"Ei i 10 • O Prt.aee In•i. _- - J,VO µt = 15 30fl 33.90 29.55 29.05 2986 28.95 18.88 16.95 '' J ,♦ `•\ 7.611 ]a.s npp 3.4M1 , TRS-��y' (f J amuLm, mM PROP P • mM 4, wwA mM RQ \• emaan r•, xuxrlmma FDON 30 30.67 1110'a !R y,w' t• 8 A "117:611.5 • '+ eR -'e° t„>. / _ �) ° m= aMMEE FOO (ri 18 31 31.0 35.0 30.15 28.85 29.55 29.55 17.55 17.55 /� A !611.6 vP ma a 6 •• m.n,o / / Fn u.e Ln Eesti m nM Pa. D4„ m� / N P9. nExaa.D ° E P"m p 4 x1717 i O FP' at . $ • Rta, L plea °e I]s a' 2s' �" I] a+ Oi ^Q � D N 0 Ld 33 30.87 J8.3D 30.25 18.75 28.65 29.115 17.03 12115 `� ]E.0 r 7111 PRM Fllaf fFInJ).a F " �') PnM 10 a g•� PR,llTae.e Riai.e I „ O wrxx.n+„°a P"D• „ \ "--_ 1!17.6 a r j r Y a Gr• y/j ° I noM 9 .JLO / PP • S \� O `L 18 5 29.67 35.67 29.23 28.73 28,63 28.83 16.63 16.83 Mp O O \ - /9 0 I ] 'x Y ^ �\ w•, ' g;q "�1 P RI�c, R 19 36 30.17 34.20 29.95 29.45 29.35 29.35 17.5 17.35 a ua ma (( q m. S3T04'40'E 20 37 2967 33.90 28.89 28.48 28.39 211,38 16,39 16.39 yR,w F. W' •'�7 "�• eps` OEx,o +u e p ^mRM tYs o FrU0Je3 - IaN _„nai+a ' •.n. a T #'1 "1^ 95.0% 38 31.17 wrxep / ; �wA / a ® Y tiA wm rrt ao"{n� wn".n 1 1' rn 21 35.30 30.31 29.81 29.71 29.]1 13.31 17.71 m k FRM ,r• 39 30.87 •^M " - r M a "• 9 •� mM F e FPL•aT • vAum N IJ 40 30.1] EdS, PFo-]•e / nE6 PRM 6 +•')i��>� FF��G STREET zz 33.70 29.21 2e.n _u.at 211.61teat 10.61 FRaF I GRI at 2967 (n EO » 1 I _ O Fn°M ,M B ]zs , / ). •'�". Q 29.17 PM• a '�'- yp r^u E 1 0 4h W� ✓ ' ,.,L{ N ni 23 33.50 20.81 26,31 28.21 211.21 16$1 18.21 (J+ ar "E_jl.a ^ I WAE(DWI:WX n �ta A' FMIe. !RM a ^Q nE[ _ -'" +� \ 1166 • Y e mpr mr])A L d• ,�r� 00 4J 29.17 moP PPI.]r.a •R. - '/ i �wr yO% '1- 1 F 4a 29.17 N� wnPv n•. -F"i':ru�w zoo' _ ( REa b 24 34.]0 26.73 28.23 2813 211,13 16.13 16.13 m•P•1 9. AtW/ 45 30.87 -wuu•xa a -'•(, •��' w ,Y -\'lav+• ' l TH 4 ; 1--_- i m.]Ta Z .,,- , _- _,_ ----- --- _' % Pmmi,,wr 'i NOW/FORNERLY OF >. a _ 1117! 1Jt'� g 'j•:wA,nx onaunm -____.__ ` (wAlu suroL � - ' WIWAM M. BEEBE r- x JPQND� err , „ Esti' i ,{ Ot .� 47 29.67 33.20 29.43 20,93 LPI 20.83 2871 UPI 20,83 20.71 k N1WPA1 F. HEANEY /` O \ IPI^ p g ao� / R - __ ^+ FOUNTAN O D mm Me) _ m,o n i ' �n w A1W�'w' u 48 LP2 28.8 tP2 20.83 DFaaE_ \�� y i' Y'r fir•, j Q O 1 Ifs 1MJ ,µ6P mM c t \\ _ ___ ,•-��TAO' _ , / Vp� 49 �Gi ✓ p"ap ]e xu},'' //,`,a� n'j1. REED s RPRq'Ly -�_ EPrWE / _ wau ancuAmx ,.4 Y1A 1 •+s �y/ 26 50 30.17 33.40 29.65 29.15 29.05 29.05 1].05 0.09 118 a 4?4t9 ' • d D O 51 30.1] 33713'30"E DEED) r/ _311.5" A E :- - A Pe� } G Q O .r 8 Fa ,.. ...�_\mre ', V N . E / 0 m Y- D • ml e w // Oµ/FO tpEPoY OF 27 62 31.17 3500 2937 2907 289] 2897 897 1897 53704'30"E ACTUAL 221.47 www n" /i•C_ ( "' a] D e ' /J\ '/ N3713 30 W ARTD LTo. W T' •T e A ""� Tr1V�]i.5 rPL�n,o AaY 4 �., 9 \ , , P 400 00' Dv 28 53 31.17 3545 3038 2989 29]9 7979 1779 7779 54 30.17 '°144 nolx wn• � 41�`Jt•T' "� .S F YP,IOP rPv MDn x,; rr rrrou I I 55 3917 \LL; 1 xLt 4 1. C- y 'Q4 F' pnM t �S1.o O 1111 Q ® Rt@0 p� a t� u'• •y 'f' �N•. 'y,�' 2B 34.85 29.27 287] 280] 20.07 18.87 18.87 C STRUCTURE TABLE se 29.87 "ROM O KATHY OF pp G W' 1111 P A I^ I ROMAN CA7XWD WTFALL BLDG LEACHING OX EXP. LEACHING SOX EXP. 30 57 20.67 34.10 29.29 2838 20.88 2809 16.69 10.69 N e 44 1 4•�7' 6 F fA '" �']• O Pq' e / ( 1 .W 44° 11�° ^ CHURCH OF NO UNITS INVERT TOP R 0 POOL INV.L.P. INV. POOL BOT.L.P. BOT. . 9 v,e �.� la ,-"•I( Pqp, E \ 5 "AYS,7 ._ SACRED HEART 10 11V 9 ® 12 TU •D - a o . " + n strtp , \ \7!11 I ^ al 113 =1I 34.20 29.85 29.35 29.25 29.25 17..25 17.25 31 59 30.67 3443 30.21 29.71 LPI 29.61 29.81 UPI 21.67 21.81 w p mroMs 17,7 a fN " O I I 0 114 30.0 80 1P2 28.51 LP2 21.51 115 29.6] Z Aq„ 'P, I FImP � °f1i-'p'0 4 w n' 1j cp " Qu � •`4 a w•"1 I I 82 34.00 29.01 28.51 20.41 26.29 18.41 18.29 11 Y 1x67 , W M ti las • ' w+9' a S A " eY wn0K mavoxo 116 29.67 82 31.67 `I' 't le•wrtErt 117 29.67 32 5,5 ]11,23 29.73 29.63 29.83 17.83 17.83 _ ° w S,><' p a 4.7"' +• 0 101 " t •.y ) .v Rw rA6]IDIr 63 -j6- 34.75 29.17 28.67 28.57 28.57 18.57 16.57 63 3067 RM min n • A 4 •+4 A® • °I8g"°", ^Ee mM JZ c Pe Je ^♦W 718 64 30.1] NfrAR ,D, maF RL`]c0 "Es iMn Ore FnaP4 I 5 N.15 29.07 20.67 2847 20.47 18.47 16,47 NOW/FO ERLY OF arxu In•, /SNI •!ew • M TH177 Iaa rrl'Y)'0 rR']aa mM ° • A ua un r^It lip 30.8] 85 29.67 g no• 4 la4 S Vep. A m.a).o fi4 35.85 30.31 29.81 29.65 28.88 1].65 1].50 LONG ISLAND W DB INC. 17x6 .T / Ap, \� W (�;,i+ o WL-u. ']• , \ m.ns wj`. 120 31,87 • Y ,i \-- t 3 66 30.17 FRnJ1. �' ' b "x, "$ / P 1, n A +•, 121 31.17 34 35.18 29.61 29.11 29.07 19.01 17.07 17.01 O w ww "� 17••17 w I I O 65 34.85 30.2] 28.7] 29.67 29.87 17.87 1].67 87 31.17 A p V / IFt iQ - � W " p•a .7�,'R Va, VN P " +�\ w,ry,n, \'A N ' 1M1 )I xfA I a 122 30.67 fib 31.87 �' I1!) 0a 123 5.17 34.25 28.85 29.35 29.22 29.22 17.22 17.22 J5 35.03 30.89 30.39 30.23 30.29 18,23 18.29 I PnM as / �^ ! o •P�e ,.^ Tp\ mE • I - 89 31.1] us N4ie L xt m 2i w s7 QA +q, a) mM 1 ^Ft. d \ yl• °i^r"`a Q 67 124 29.67 34.03 28.2} 28.]} 28.63 28.63 11.83 16.63 ]0 30.1] ».a �„ •es \ P \ • P 1111 qt °0 " REe dF -p5 JD \ `' e"` ^ M1 38 35.85 19.87 2817 29.07 29.07 77.07 17.07 5y \ p or ""1 n " Rj m0! irL.J^a A V N 123 5.0 71 30.67 Z W •,4 (;J 4f5' A V ro b RQ TJ 69 34.20 29.75 2835 29.12 28.88 17,12 16.08 � `,, \ R7" O € •" ,y, \ P � F x17..5)3 mM Q n A N 128 30.87 6o P 4 37 72 30,67 5.5 30.38 29.69 29.79 29.79 77.79 17.79 IQ O I A3 ( •w1A'AP "4aP yl r - E \ . ex a 1'•'r'r m, q 4Y • F°OP 7z 69 127 31.17 3440 5.81 30.31 30.21 30.27 18.21 78.27 38 73 30.67 34.70 ]0.39 28.69 29.79 29.79 17.79 17.79 R2;AC '� sK ® RA Pae' \'a d •e mM • I 4t aY u Rs. A �a• n u REe. tl P J).0 7] v lF • 128 5.87 L= ° pM„a i OA ( E / xAt�@ G A Y ] A ia• \ 70 34.40 29.91 29,41 29.31 29.31 17.37 I7.31 J4 31.17 4x11 S YI A� / AAk'QS mM 3 ° \� I m-m.a mM 129 70.17 J9 35.10 ]0.89 30.89 30.39 30.2] 111.1] 182] 0 W () , ♦ IrM mM ^ !RM M Por 11 'Ra P PRM 75 31.17 o°B.• a 'YO IEa � ^Ea. GQ � '�^T RL-�d RR a S"FS '" a �� a "E5, ^n p,yj X n, �, \-- -a1f tl 71 IJD 29.8] 33.90 29.39 28.89 28.79 28.67 76.79 18.67 cp I li 40 78 30.67 34,30 30.43 29.93 29.83 29.83 17.83 17.83 fr1 fR�3is 8 mn]T.0 I SSI i • E}L�J).] iN11.a ]E. • / rit-,1).D m.aa \ / .•e r� \ DSO" 7 --mob 131 5.1] J2 34.10 29.73 2!1.23 29.1] 29.13 17.13 17,13 ]] 30.67 wn, Paaposm 132 30,0 41 38.10 29.95 29.5 29.25 29.25 1]35 17.25 RAsx CA 78 30.17 L•'°64a _ mss -� -�•1!s \ 73 133 30,17 34.05 29.69 29.19 29.09 29.09 17.09 17.09 42 79 29.67 5.00 29.37 28.81 28.71 20.77 16.71 18.71 T )xmcasr T� - 134 30.87 s0 30.17 N36'54'\W I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I mss�. 1 1]s 5.0 43 34.20 29.57 29.07 2697 211.97 ms] 111.87 I I I 2009,51' DEED I 74 34.65 28.65 28.15 29.05 29.05 17.05 17.05 B1 30.67 NOW/FDRMERLY OF 136 5.67 82 31.17 BAR9AL1, 2D .22' (ACTUA 4" O .6000 ! UM11 NOW/FORMERLY OF O 75 133 31.17 35.25 30.61 30.11 30,01 30.01 11.01 18.01 83 37,67 3445 31.19 30.69 30.59 30.59 18.59 10.59 NOW/FORMERLY OF O SHELBY. NOW/FORMFRLY OF 138 30.17 NOW/FORMERLY OF Coq(, NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORNERLY OF PAUL M. S, CONCETEA 76 34.1D 29.29 28.]8 28.69 28.89 16.69 18.69 IS 84 31.17 HIGHLAND ROAD CORP. DAVID A. NOW/FORMERLY OF DEMBROSKY, UEMBROSKY, STASIUKIENCZ, I 139 29.6] 34.30 28.81 29.31 29,21 29.21 17.21 V.21 II MOHRING RT. Z Y GONNA M. FRANCIS OpNIC S,J STANLEY A. STANLEY A. EXISTING PRIVATE HENRY YI DEBORAH NDW/FgiMEIiLY OF 115 30.17 ' O I Q 8 MARIE C. 150' SANITARY RADIUS WATER WELL OUARRCEW. 86 30.17 FROM CENTER OF ( ) JOHN k ISABEL 48 34.40 29,99 29.49 29.39 29.25 17.39 17.25 J TYPICAL FOR 11 a7 30.67 WATER WELL LL 47 85 37.17 34.20 3073 30.23 30,13 30.10 1813 18.10 J (TYPICAL FOR 11) U1 89 31.67 Q 48 BO 30.67 34,20 29.81 29.31 29,13 29.21 17.13 17.21 DRAINAGE AREA RUNOFF CALCULATIONS REQUIRED 91 30.1] m SINGLE FAMILY PRC UNITS: 49 92 30.17 34.10 29.73 29.23 29.13 28.11 0.13 17,11 rwc_ sv97Fu FnR 7 slur.Ir FAMILY UNITS DA i Pervious 20,361.33 SFx 0.3 = 6,108,40 SIF DA 10 Pervious 44,795.61 SFz 0.3 = 13,438.68 SF DA iB Pervious 61,672.24 SFx 0.3 = 18,501.67 SF DRAINAGE RUNOFF CALCULATIONS PROVIDED 93 30.87 50 33.10 5.D7 29.57 29.47 29.47 17.47 1).47 IN LEACHING POOLS 94 31.77 Impervloua 6,838.76 SFx 1.0 - 6,838.76 SF Impervious 27,317.91 SF x 1,0 - 27,317.91 SF Impervlou" 63,212.81 SF x 1.0 - 63,212.81 SF 95 31.17 SANITARY FLOW CALCULATIONS: 150 GPD/UNIT X 2 UNITS = 300 GPD Total Runoff Area - 12,947.16 SF Pond 25,280.68 SFx 1.0 - 25,280.68 SF Gravel 10,577.09 SFx 0.7 = 7,403.96 SF DA 1 12,947.16 SF x 0.5' = 6,473.58 OF STORAGE REQUIRED 51 98 30.67 34.20 30.31 29.81 29.71 29.71 17.71 17.71 ALLOWABLE SITE FLOW 300 GPO X 2 DAYS - 600 GALLONS Gazebo 1,179,78 SF x 1.0 = 1,179,78 SF Total Runoff Area = 89,118.45 SF 6,473,58 OF / 10D.88 SF/vr = 64,17 VF - 2.011.165 SF X 755. X 300 GPD/UNR - 22,625 GPD (USE: 1200 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 8'0 X 4' LD.) DA 1A 17.392.90 SF Total Runoff Area 67,217.05 SF_ es 30.0 - DA 19 48,801.44 §F S x 100.88 '0 X EO 7,061.60 CF PROVIDED 52 9a 29.67 s4.5 28.41 28.91 1e.a1 28,e1 16.81 16.17 Pervious pervio 11,959.65 SFx 0.3 =' 3,587.90 SF DA 11 Pervious .57 SF Pervious 17,248.45 SFx 0,3 = 5,174.54 SF USE: (5) 12'0 % 14' ED POOLS 20,000 SF/UNR '300 RING - GAL/SF/DAY = 200 SF OF WALL AREA REQUIRED Impervious 5,433.25 SFx 1.0 = 5,433.25 SF Pervloua 47.603.03 SFx 0.3 = 14,280.91 SF 53 99 28.17 5.50 28.40 27.88 27.89 27.09 75.89 75.89 avelImpervious 24,416.52 IF x 0.7 = 24,418.52 SF WO RING - 25 BF/FT OF HEIGHT Total Runoff Area = 9,021.15 SF Impervious 20,703.58 SFx 1.0 = 20,703.58 SF Gravel 7,136.47 SFx 0.7 = 4,995.53 SF DA 2 21,657.44 SF % 0.6' 10,828,72 OF STORAGE REQUIRED a4 100 30.67 PROPOSED FLOW 34.5 28.91 29.41 28.31 x9.27 vat 1].21 2110 38'0 312' - e V.F, Off-Site Runoff Area SFx 0.3 = 1,253.48 SF Total Runoff Area = 34,586.58 SF 10x 100.2 OF / 10088 SF/VF = 107.34 D 107 30.1) 139 PRC UNITS ® 150 GPD/UNIT = 20,850 GPD (USE: 11'9 % 12' E.D. LEACHING POOL) OA 2 46,579.43 SF Total Runoff Area - 36,237.87 SF 7 x 100.88 '0 X EO = 11,298.56 CF PROVIDED 102 30.67 Pervious 35,802.84 SFx 0.3 = 10,880.65 SF DA 20 Pervious .06 SF USE: (7) 12'0 X 16' ED POOLS 55 5.75 30.5 29.85 29.75 29.75 17,75 17.75 CLUBHOUSE: POOL AREA 2,000 SF Impervious off Area SFx 1.0 = 10.878.59 SF DA 11A 51.007.47 BF Pervloua 23,093.77 SFx 0.3 = 6,928.13 SF 103 31.17 GYM AREA OFFICE SF ® 0.3 GPD 300 GPD Total Runoff Area = 21,857.44 SF 104 29.17 MEETING / OFFICE AREA 1,500 SF O O.D6 GPD/SF 90 GPD MULTI FAMILY AFFORDABLE UNITS: Pervious Impervious 18,304.41 SF x 0.3 = 4,891.32 SF Impervloua 22.778.82 SFx 1,0 = 22.4 3.67 SF OA 3 11,44797 F x 0.5' = SF/VF 97 CF STORAGE REQUIRED 58 34.10 28.73 2833 28.11 20.11 16.17 18.11 Imf-Siteua 21,463.88 SF x 0.3 = 21,463.88 SF Gravel ff Area SFx 0.7 = 1,943.67 SF 5,72100, OF / ' ED SF/VF 60 CIF P VF 105 30.77 INDOOR AND OUTDOOR POOLS 75 BATHERS O 5 GPD/BATHER 375 GPD reur. avrrcM FOR 4 RUILmNG uNIT6 OA 3 26,050.47 SF Olf-Site 13.239.18 SFx 0.3 = 3,971.75 SF Total Runoff Area = 31,279.42 SF 5 x 100,88 x 14' ED 7,081.60 CF PROVIDED 67 101 31.17 35.20 30,88 30.79 30.29 5.29 10.29 16.29 27,875 GPD Pervious 18.003.82 SFx 0.3 = 5,401.09 SF Total Runoff Area = 30,326.95 SF USE: (5) 12'9 X 14' ED POOLS 107 30.17 TOTAL PROPOSED FLOW 150 GPD/UNR X 4 UNITS = 600 GPD Impervious 6,046.85 SFz 1.0 = 8,046.85 SF DA 21 708,895.58 SF 58 34.00 28,57 2807 27.97 27.97 15.97 15.97 :.SEPTIC TANKS PERMITTED 6DO GPD X 2 DAYS - 1.200 GALLONS Total Runoff Area = 11,447.94 SF Pervious 43,024.00 SFx 0.3 - 12,907.20 SF 108 29.17 (USE: 1200 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 8'11 X 4' L,D.) OA 118 19,716.21 SF DA 4 23,744.59 ST 0,5' 8 11,872.30 17 STORAGE REQUIRED Pervious 4,486.41 SF x 0.3 = 1,345.92 SF Gravel Impervious 50, 13.66 SFx 1.0 = 50,257,92 SF 11,x 100. OF / ' ED 12,10 = 1OF P VF 59 109 31.67 DA 4 54,832.48 Gravel 13,813.68 SFz 0,7 = 9,529.58 SF 5,20 30.77 30.27 30.77 30,17 111.17 78.17 LEGEND: SW GALLS GAL/SF/DRY = 400 9F OF WALL AREA REQUIRED Pervious 44,411.24 SFx 0.3 = 13,323.37 SF Imp Total 18.370.29 SF 1.0 = 18,370,29 SF Total Runoff Area 72,694.68 SF 8 x 100.68 x 15' 5' POOLS OF PROVIDED 110 31.17 8'O RING = 25 SF/FT OF RING Total Runof( Area 19,716.21 SF USE: (e) 12'0 % 15' ED POOLS 111 29,67 Impervious 10,421.22 SFz 1.0 = 10,421,22 SF 80 34,10 29.31 28.87 28.77 2x.71 18,77 18.71 (US SF/25 SF/FF = 78 V.F. Total Runoff Area = 23,744.59 SF OA 22 Pervious .03 SF 772 30.87 (USE: (x) 8'O X a' E.O. LEACHING POOLS) OA 12 361,466.46 SF Pervloua 28,533.69 SFx 0.3 = 8,560.11 SF OA 11 36,237.97 SF 0.5' = 10,118.99 OF STORAGE REQUIRED B C a •• SEPTIC TANK 18,118.99 OF / 100.68 18.15 = 1OF P VF A DA 5 1rvious .95 SF Pervious 146,285.38 SFx 0.3 = 43,685.61 SF Impervious 3,708.28 SFx 1.0 = 3,708.28 SF U : 10088 x14' 15 = 18,158.40 OF PROVIDED SCDHS REFERENCE No. C10-O6-0013 r LEACHING POOL a ' 4>E Pervious 83,167.19 SFz 0.3 = 18,29016 SF Impervious 56,860,82 SFx 1,0 = 56,660.82 SF Pond off Area SF z 1.0 = 23, 85.4 SF USE: DDI 12'0ONA X 15 ED POOLS c - crM AREA I,Ooo SF 01 0,3 GPD 300 GPD Impervious 15,290.11 SFx 1.0 = 75,292.11 SF Pond toff Area SFx 1.0 = 158,520.26 SF Total Runoff Area 23,853.45 SF T 1 ADDITIONAL 12'8 x 8' ED ,� EXPANSION LEACHING POOL Gravel off Arm SFx 0.7 = 05,152.68 SF Total Runoff Area 259,086.69 SF TOTAL OF OF STORAGE PROVIDED = 18,965.44 CF 6 7/21/6° REN9<DABPfAANEWOF ORAFrFJ9DATEDJUNEYDOBCOMMENIB res INDOOR It AMID AREA 1,500 5F O 906 GPD/SF 90 GPD Total Runoff Areo 105,169.82 SF DA 23 Pervious SF 0 00/p/a7 FEYB®A6 PER B.CDH9COMA4TfB q® CATCH BASIN INDOOR ANO OUTDOOR POOLS 75 BATHERS O 5 GPO/BATHER 765_G20 DA 13 12,872.74 SF P pervio 10,757.48 SFx 0,3 - 3,227.24 SF DA 15 20.434.18 SF z ON = 10,23243 OF STORAGE REQUIRED 0_ TOTAL = ]119 GPD p 8 x 100. OF ' ED = 101,43 VF D 71'[��I111WQ�''r DA fi 57,188.66 SF Pervious 613,33 SFx 0.3 = 184.00 SF Impervious 4,419.01 SFx 1,0 - 4,419.01 SF 6 w/a]/m ItYBED AB PER BCDNB.CMA8R8 fE.q 0• DRAINAGE PIPE (US GPD X 2 DAYS S 1.IC T NK 10'8 = _ / c7 (USE: 2000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK tD'9 X 4' LD.) Pervious 31.505.15 SFx 0.3 = 9.451,55 SF Impervious 12,359.41 SFx 1.0 = 12,359,41 SF Total Runoff Area 7x648.25 SF 8 z 100.88 % 13 ED = 10,481.52 OF PROVIDED W SANITARY PIPE Impervious 22,670.57 SFx 1.0 = 22,670.57 SF Total Runoff Area 12,543.41 SF USE: (8) 12'9 X 13' ED POOLS 2 02115/m REv1B®Ae PER ecDHB.cOLaBlfe IEB n MULTIFAMILY 765 GPD/L5 GAL/SF/DAY - 510 SF OF WALL AREA REQUIRED Gravel 3,012,94 SFx 0.=7 - 2,109.06 SF 7 WN1611 rim®Ae FER e.cnl+a caM.tE1R0 Lau/rte rp AFFORDABLE 8'O RING = 25 SF/Fr OF RING Total Runoff Area 34,231.17 SF DA 14 14,879.14 SF OA 24 41,144.16 SF DA 23 7,645.25 SF x 0.5' - 3,823.13 CF STORAGE REQUIRED 765 SF/25 SF/Fr - 20.4 VF Pervloua 9,882.94 SF x 0.3 = 2,964.88 SF Pervious 32,141.62 SFx 0,3 = 9,642.49 SF (USE: (2) We X 11' E.D. LEACHING POOLS) DA 7 83,007.87 Pond 4,996.20 SF x 1.0 - 4,996,20 SF Impervious 9,002,54 SFx 1.0 = 9,002.54 SF 3,82100. CF / 3' ED SF 23 .937.90 VF Na OATS FkveloN m, Foy Pervious 35,078.88 z 0.3 - 10,523.66 Total Runoff Area = 7,961.08 SF Total Runoff Area = 18.645.03 SF 3 x 100.81 x 13 4' D 4,236,96 CF PROVIDED GRAPHIC.' ,SCALE Impervious 41,274.34 x 1.0 = 41,274.34 USE: (3) 12'0 X 14' ED POOLS DWN.BY: JM Grovel 6.654.65 x 0.7 - 4,658.26 DA 15 50,676.22 SF DA 25 49,732.74 SF OVERALL SANITARY PLAN �] IP. 0 50 Iso 200 00 Total Runoff Area - 56,45836 Pervious 43,159.82 SFx 0.3 = 12,947.85 SF Pervious 39,523.60 SFx 0.3 - 11,857.08 SF DA 26 27,477.80 SF x 100 13,738.90 CF STORAGE REQUIRED Fan D5GN.BY: SJR d Impervious 7,516.40 SF x 1.0 - 7,516.40 SF Impervious 10,209.14 SF z 1.0 = 10,209.14 SF 9 x 10.00 OF / ' ED - SF/VF' = 138.19 VF v P 9 z 100,88 x ifi' 6' D POOLS CF PROVIDED THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE: 1)17/06 DA 8 Pervious .88 16 Total Runoff Area = 20,464.35 SF Total Runoff Area = 22,068.22 SF IL Pervious 16,881,62 SFx 0.3 - 5,084.49 SF USE: (B) 12'0 % 16' EO PDOLS ert^f..Tr=o AT m Impervious 18,462.09 SFx 1,0 - 18,462.09 SF DA 16 52,209.75 SF DA 26 56,241.66 SF CHK'D BY, SJR i$ ( [N FEET ) Gravel 2,993.17 SFx 0.7 = 209.52 SF Pervious 27,377,37 SFx 0.3 - 8,213.21 SF Pervious 28,135.18 SFx 0,3 - 8,440.55 SIF CUTCHOGUE c Total Runoff Area = 23,736,10 SF Impervious 21,106.41 SF x 1.0 = 21,106.41 SF Impervious 14,659.99 SFx 1.0 - 14,659,99 SF NOTES, DATE: 1/17/05 - P P TOWN OF 90UTHOLO, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW Y a.a NOTE Gravel 3,725.87 SFx 0.7 = 1.927.18 SF Gravel 858,2 SFx 0.7 = ,776.4 SF 1, ALL DRAINAGE PIPE S BE 18" RCP L NS JOB No 0002 OWNER: APPLICANT: DA 9 Pervious ,50 SF Total Runoff Area 31.927.BO SF Off-Site off Area SFx 0.3 = 3,776.47 SF oraTPRFCT 1000, SECTION Toe, ar ocK oT, LOT 3a.a THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE Pervious 29,361.35 SFz 0.3 = 4.09941 SF Total Runoff Area 27,477.80 SF MINIMUM SLOPE UNLESS NOTED ON PLANS. - S PROPERTY OF NELSON k POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR Impervious 44,099.20 SFx 1.0 = 44,099.20 SF DA 17 142,215,12 SF = 2.ALL UTILITIES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE pp F7_E Na` ; ADDITIONS TO THESE & POPE. AREA VIOLATION R BECTON NOCRO, LTD. THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE, LLC Gravel 7,066.95 SFx 0.7 = 4,948.87 SF Pervious 88,597.66 SFx 0.3 = 20,579.30 SF Total DA Runoff 1,308,554,05 SF APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. NELSON O� POPE 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS 140 EAST MAIN ST. 1721 -D NORTH OCEAN AVENUE Total Runoff Area = 57,654.47 SF Impervious 64,837.52 SFx 1.0 = 66.145.52 SF CAM. 6702884 WILL BE PROSECUTED. Gravel 8f Area SFx 0.7 = 6,145.94 SF ENGINEERS O SUFIVEYORS 0 RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 MEDFORD, NY 11763 Total Runoff Area 91,562.77 SF )4 WALT WHITMANROAD,427- MEL620 m ,NY11747- cor SHEET; OF: o (680 427-5665 FAX(830 427-5820 wwwneleanpolae.um 9 SHEER 30F 10 _6 (7 51 s4 n g 1 o�C oQ \ NOW/FORMERLY OF ESTATE OF NOW/FORMERLY OF 4 (� c FRANK MACHINCHICK BERTHA KURCZEWSKI CREAT PECONIC BAY �c 1901.44' (DEED) I S38'3050"E (DEED _ —_ — — — 1904.80 (ACTUAL) ( CTU _ N N — SCALE-1'-M05AMPILE S38'24'20"E AL) N LA L4 Lp '0 O > � l� z p Z Q POND, N_�/�- N�i i O ; ( V V D � \\ 6.J NNOW/FORMERLY OF m 1 F\ NTA G' WATER (;IRCUlATION \ 0 CHARLES J.MR T. ,FAN 1 837'04'40 'E 273;6$r J J = NOW/FORMOUTHOF 1 * I OTOWN OF SUTHOLD I V DO O LA J Pc° EnO all DO N � n TTI o I =�_.l � r " S37'04'40 'E 212D 95.00 e A�' (n 1 ; POND ' N GRIFFING STREET ) cn cn ? O Lyi N �WAIERUiI�N 0 0 ER 20— N NOW/FORMERLY OF 8,WILLIAM M, BEEBE IIS/ & WILLIAM F. HEANEY NA6OgC/PF EO - WATEFOUNTAIN TION OND' F4ND I v A47' ROSIAPE EDGE - STARCWATER 200 - - A� anG1uRjj FaunTAN I,SOLE _ _ WRIER CIRCVLARONS3T13'30°E (DEED) ' Fou6uvNDmC)537'04'30"E ACTUAL 221 "QON ! _ p NOW/FORMERLY OF PIQNjD N37'13'30"W 400.00' ARTO LTD. A 0 LO 00 NOW/FORMERLY OF N WA R clRcuunpN ROMAN CATHOLIC OMNinI ' / CHURCH OF d' .�- SACRED HEART Lo Z � RMERLY OF VINEYARDS INC. 6 0 I IIn 0 z cDOCTI rQ Ln � I O C0 rri PROPOSED) / EMERGENCY CRASH GATE � — — — — — — — T ACCESS RD� NOW/FORMERLY OF 2009.51' (DEED) N36'54'20"W BARSALI, — 7 NOW/FORMERLY OF ALDO & LOUISE NOW/FORMERLY OF 2009.22' (ACTUAL) NOW/FORMERLY OF COOK, NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF SHELBY, NOW/FORMERLY OF HIGHLAND ROAD CORP, LJ DAVID A. NOW/FORMERLY OF DEMBROSKY, DEMBROSKY PAUL M. & CONCETTA STASIUKIEWICZ, & MOHRING RT. & DONNA M. DIVINEY, STANLEY JR.FRANCIS J. STANLEY JR. HENRY & DEBORAH NOW/FORMERLY OF Q & MARIE C. OUARTICELLI, J JOHN & ISABEL W d J (n _0 Of M 52.22' s 7/2110n HEMIED AS EIER EW OFA DRAR BB DATED JIME,200 7Z.— IgB 4 51071M RUSEDF BD RET IEe L B 00/22107 FlEMBED CLUB HOIIBE Aa PFA CLBR e R a .• 2 1219/Oe PEYAED AB PER BCDHR.COANB,fe LOD/ms md, I B2/00/OB REb18ED LAYOUE PER CIJB-li BWREe W O O 00/vine BUBMRT OMIROWNCF60MOD BR m GRAPHIC SCALE xo. DAM Rensax ft N u +y RD 8.00' zs.00' ao FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS PLAN DW" , SU FIRE TRUCK FOR D(xwY: SJR Width : 8.00' THE HERITAGE AT CUDATE, 1/17/05TCHOGUE a v [N FEET ) Track 8,00' 611LgTE0 AT (a LockDAK'D BY, SJR to Lock Time : 6.00 CUTCHOGUE c Steering Angle 40' DATE: t/t7/07/p5 c TOWN OF 90UTHOLO, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK DISTRICT 1000, 8EOTION T02, BLOCK O'1, LOT 33-3 `OBNQ' 00026 I_ THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THESE PROPERTY OF NELSON & POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR w NELSON & POPE CAM. - 3 DOCUMENTS ARE TI VIOLATION OF SECTION CADD. 000286P 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS ENGINEERS � SURVEYORS N W1LL BE PROSECUTED, 572 WALT WHRMAN ROAD,MELVILLE,N.Y.V747-2188 SCALE- 1'-Bp' (631)427-5665 FAX(630427-5620 wwwneleonpope.com SHEER 1 OF 1 f'q Q _n 0 Plate 2 Landscape Plans Charles W. Kuehn, Last Revised August 2006 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE ODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACE QTY. KEY $G LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLLIA SWEET GUM 4" cal. 2 PIECE REINFORCED RUBBER AS ACER SACCHARUM SUGAR MAPLE 4" COI. BL STRAND X12 WIRE (TWISTED) BG APPROX 2' PALL GIA. BETULA ALISA CLUMPS CLUMP WHITE BIRCH 4" cal. DRIVE e'-a" LONG z^-z D/4" DIA. 4" Cal. WHITE CEDAR STAKES AT SLIGHT NIA NFP PRUNUS CERASIFERA NEWPORT NEWPORT FLOWERING PLUM ANGLE k DRAW VERTICAL. W 4° cal. 6" SAUCER u LT LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP YELLOW POPLAR BURLAP OR KRAFT PAPER WRAP. a LONG EA FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR EUROPEAN ASH 4" cal, pt ^ WWHH EE 3" WOOD CHIPS--, CALIPER MEASURED 6" CEDAR SWHII CP PYRUS CALERYANA CLEVELAND SELECT CLEVELAND ARISTOCRAT PEAR 4" cal ` ABOVE CRADE DflIVEN AT SLIGHT _ \\1 ANGLE k DRAWN ROOT BALL z 4" cal. VERTICAL 3" WOOD CHIPS `r JD C U J P G O tB.. DO KC KWANZAN CHERRY 4" Cal, � MINIMUM 6 min LO 6" min I ' CRC PRUNUS VIRGINIAN SHUBERT CO 1 CANADA REO CHERRY 4" cal. W CCP JAPENESE VELKOVA SERRATA JAPENESE VELKOVA 4" cal. c HORTICULTURAL �- SEED OR SOD AS REQ. SOIL BACKFILL —T � � , HORTICULTURAL ON 6" HORTICULTURAL SOIL. T SOIL BACKFILL ;° .E I I I BALL N OVER UNDISTURBEDrll TN THUJA OCCIDENTALUS NIGRA AMERICAN ABBORVITAE sa1L BALL DIA B LL DIA. I M WPTAto X MEDIA DENSIFORMIS WHITE PINE 6'-7' ht. 1 -D^ f1'-O^ LLLI BHJ JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA BLUEHAVEN BLUE HAVEN JUNIPER 6'-7' ht. MAJOR TREE DETAIL MINOR TREE DETAIL SHRUBBERY DETAILS �Sj, > x 3:: X KBS p KOSTER BLUE SPRUCE W-7' ht. NOTE: HORTICULTURAL SOIL BACKFILL TO CONTAIN / — PA AZALEA HYBRID TRADITION PINK 15"-18" HT MIN. 50% OF SOIL TAKEN OUT OF PLANTING HOLE T m z LL TA AZALEA HYBRID TREASURE 18"-21" Hl (n f ,L O O O SGJ PLANTING DETAILS JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS SEAGREEN SEA GREEN JUNIPER 24 -30" SPACE Notes: v X ll Bare root plants will not 6e permitted W li d DO JHC ILEX CRENTA JAPANESE HOLLY COMPACTA 18"-2d' HT All planting 'to be pruned c rn ROSEUM ELEGANS RHODODENDRON NTS accordance with best & accepted LL RER RHODODENDRON ROSEUM ELEGANS 8"- " H nurseryman's practice SLP 13ERBERIS MENTORENSIS MENTOR BARBERRY 18"-24" HT Q O N zo w CSY TAXUS MEDIA DENSIFORMIS COMPACT SPREADING YEW 15"-18" H4 < N FV VIBURNUM CARLESI FRAGRANT VIBURNUM 2' '-3ht. w ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS TO HAVE UNDERGROUND SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF SOUIHHOLD SPECIFICATIONS v U z AS ASTIL8E z FE FERN a. MG MADEN GRASS a FG FOUNTAIN GRASS z TG TIGAR GRASS w HO HOSTA a LI LIRIOPE NOTE: ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS TO HAVE MIN. 2" PINE BARK MULCH EXISTING TREE TO BE PROTECTED PROVIDE 4'-0" HIGH FABRIC "CONSTUCTION" 5'-0" BARRIOR FENCING SUPPORTED BY MTL. STAKES ® 5'-0" O.C. — 5'-0" RADIUS AROUND NOTES: EXISTING TREE 1. THE EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROTECTED ° °=a°. o o a a X53 AS NESC. FRONT CONSTURCTION AREAS °' 0° °a°°° °°f"° cage o° oQ000 oal°s^ EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION p 2. PLANTING, OTHER THAN LAWN OR LOW GROUND COVER, =a° 0O °oa°o 8efe J1 SHALL BE PLACED NO CLOSER THAN TWO (2) INCHES 'aa o' it o° o°000 o�1sa N 2g o FROM CURB LINES ADJACENT TO PARKING STALLS. a a � 3. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THREE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL (3) INCH THICK LAYER OF WOOD CHIPS. 4. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PLANTED AND 'MAINTAINED NOTE: ALL EXSITfING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN OF SOOTHHOLD BE PROTECTED DURING COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE MAIN REGULATIONS AND SITE IMPROVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS T TAINED TO INSURE PROPER PROTECTION AT ALL TIMES 5. PRUNING REQUIRED 3: o ALL BROKEN, DISEASED, DYING, OR DEAD BRANCHES TWO INCHES (2") OR MORE IN DIAMETER SHALL BE PRUNED. LIMBS WHICH CROSS OTHERS, v z o ARE WEAKLY ATTACHED , ARE OF LOW VIGOR, OR WHICH ENCROACH ¢ wLL ON STRUCTURES, OR DO NOT ALLOW ADEQUATE CLEARENCE ABOVE = O cD ROADS, SHALL BE PRUNED. ANY BRANCH WHICH MAY BE PARTLY UNSOUND c� 0 O AND HAZARDOUS YET HAS A HEALTHY LATERAL BRANCH AT LEAST ONE— a THIRD THE DIAMETER OF THE PARENT BRANCH SHALL BE PRUNED BEYOND = v THE HEALTHY BRANCH, ALL SHRUBS RESULTING FROM STORM DAMAGE, OR IMPROPER PRIOR PRUNING SHALL BE PRUNED. WOODY VINES SHALL BE CUT NEAR BASE OF TRUNK. FINAL CUTS SHALL BE CLEANLY MADE TO Aucusr zoos PRESERVE THE COLLAR AT EITHER THE PARENT BRANCH OR TRUNK. • Y.cI':. 1" = 30'-0" "•air°a• C.W.Kuehn , chsccrc zl. Mod ro. 2400 reeFW LS - 1 LANDSCAPE LELANO CYPRESS 0 6'-0" O.C. PROPERTY LINE WHITE PINE 0 6'-0" O.C. Z PROPERTY LINE Ln 00 HOLLY BUSH - 4 W HIGH ILEX BUSH- 4'-0' HIGH HOLLY BUSH - 4'-0' HIGH • AZALEA 0 4'-0' O.C. 00 AZALEA 0 4'-0' O.C. HOLLIE BUSH - 4'-0' HIGHw HOLLY BUSH - 4'-0' HIGH ♦ ILE% BUSH - 4'-0' HIGH L - r, N S' ILEX BUSH - 4'-O' HIGH HOLLY BUSH 4'-0' HI H . L • ♦ Uo N _ � n Y C) Lo r Big _ x 3: x ow ¢ Im z w v� a Q � 0 0 �J// � 0. FOUNTAIN GRASS I.,,�- Q Z LNO Q N r LID L BERM PLAN PROPERTY LINE WHITE PINE OR LELAND CYPRESS 6'-0" O.C. — REFER PLAN ABOVE FOR SPACING ALTERNATE ROWS OF FOUNTAIN GRASS — REFER TO AZALEA, HOLLY AND I PLAN ABOVE FOR SPACING ILEX — REFER PLAN, ABOVE PINE NUGGET MULCH I 3'-0" MIN. d; i HIGH BERM � bl o� TYPICAL BERM SCREEN PLANTING I RAISED BERM ,.N A 20'-0" Llj Y OQ U O w F BERM SECTION " zo N � O Z ' LLj flo) date; 'AUGUST 2006 scale; 1/4• = V-D„ drawn by: C.W.Kuehn checked by; project no: 24000 sheet # LS - 2 drawlrq We LANDSCAPE PLAN THE HERITAGE AT CU TCH OGU E • CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK — TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LL xSwESTATFE OFY DF NOW//FORMERLY OF I I J CRANK MACHINCHICK I I OCRTfiA KURCZEN5KI I 1 ,901 .4 �J ul = Ur — — S 51 '13'55" E — W _ a -- KE n — -- --- 17 g A A A A /q Q BUNKER PUTTING GREEN -Tr) J 0 A g A A C E — C I V p E ,� O NOWIFORMERLY OF o W o = 2AHARA, W W Y W W W W W W N CHARLES J. k JEAN T. V } (C M W W t W Vravcletl anc for N § — X ?j ORIO 1 AftW W W N S 49'47'45" P.r I,ann ehicM I m z 4 1 f 3 BAY NO ORMERLY OF /� 1 I i¢. • W w W (�L��W W 273. 68 MAINTENANCE TO OF SWIHOL � / L Q LK C 33 13 \V/I�'� GARAGE V A U d Qm" B W w a Q If 11 I , A A WWW I _ 1 a a D A A C @ I —� 0 A ,3 35' X 60' , � (I Q n LANDSCAPED AREA INDICATES A 711 A B (+ 1 , O `� Z (, SHEET pPEO BERM - REFER TO B l� A `— O SHEET LB-2 FOR BERM DETAIL WW � � - E __ ___ N W IIB •P TENNI CF3W •--- og nu W ,3 ,� d- �7 4 E EWWWWpWW12 3B' 1212 cn 95.00' ' 1 ���III W WW W W V WW WW VOra ON W W W W V W • V W W W W W Ii A W W W „ E C E B D W FFIN S ET n� A WY' W W 'YW Y' hV W p i ry� 119 �' A ,o W W W W W W W W W B g W W 1 144�� WW V WWW WW WW WWW WW WWY YWWWW E \/l, D ry WW W W V W WWW WW WW — C W W� W W��C W W�T�P Y W W 7'�C� W W Y • W W .f��. W W W W��L W W W^W•r�L W • •�� I NDW/FORMERLY OF 1 1 Y' •Y' W W M1 W W W W • W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WILLIAM M. BEEBE Z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWW WWW W W W •W W W W•W W W W W W W •� �Wll�+lwl W I Ln k MILLIAM F BEPNEY A W W W W W W W W W W , W W W W W W W W W V W V W W W W W W V W W W W W W W W W W W Y W W W N 1 : % E W W W W ��Wp� W g WWWW WW WW WW WWW W WWW WWW WWW WW W WW VIJI./W \ W WW S49°56'35" E W W WW WW WW W WW 221 .47' A W W D W W W W W W W W W W W W T W W W 0 \ Y W W W W W W W d' B C E — ,,� C B p W W W W p E A B W ` • W W • W N 49°56:35" W 400.00' NOW/ ORMERLY OF N B A E E D B _ LTO. WWW �s R A z D A A o a NOW/FORMERLY OF A /q�� I ROMAN CATHOLIC 0 e A A D A CHURCH OF a n n A E SACRED HEART w A — — — � ' W LO -,, ( A p A no A n w = r� � I I C A A o = � o z E — o B o ¢ = A A A A C B B E A Lr 00 8 U 8 0 ~ N 49'37'25" W — —I — —I — — — 2,010.62' I — -- -- — HATCHED ARE INDICATES HAiGHEO AREA INDICATES • c LL HATCHED AREA INDICATES LANDSCAPED BERM - REFER TO LANDSCAPED BERM - REFER ICI SHEET S-2 BERM - REFER TO 0- SHEET LS-2 F R BERM SHEET LS-1 FOR BERM SHEET LS-2 FOR BERM DETAIL I I DETAIL I DETAIL „ W,N .,L., NOW/FORMERLY OF I.l.l NOW/FORMERLY DF I NOW/FMMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF OW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF I Q I NOw/FORMERLY OF date, HIGHLANDk MONRWG RT.RP Q DAV1D A. FRANCISY,J. STANLEY JR. STANLEY A. ALOOAk LOUISE PAUL M kLCONCETTA HENRY IkKDEBORAH Q JOHN k CEU-1. OCTOBER 2005 , I I J I k DONNA M. k MARIE C. I I I I I I Cr_ I © OoO $cafe: o a drawn by; I I N m byUEHN project no; 2500 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN sheet # 1 " = 80'-0" OC, GREAT PECONIC BAY LS - 3 KEY MAP drawing Clue SCALE: 1" = 0.5 MILE OVERALL ANDCSAPE THE HERITAGE AT CU TCH OGU E CUTCHQ.GUE, NEW YORK 7- TOWN OF SOUTHQW INAw I Q NOW/FORMERLYOF I NOW/FORMERLY OF ESTATE OF FRANK MACHINCHICK BERTHA KURC2EWSW 1 ,901 .44' �l z -0 N = a S 51 '13'55" E _ _ - _ y 00 1 cc IB Mas Y LIMIT UTO! ` `_ ,O ER OF OF LYIT O 1] 12 11 UPN MMI ! CHARLES a & JEAN T. _, V 0 O l Ankxm i Yo ) 24 IIsi 19 15 10 YEILD TO \ N U F" LO r ?W 2] DTREEF NAME MPN YELLDTO 20 O 1fi 5 PEPRNTIIWIS FOUTAIN — X d Q revs RMNS 3 (` '� O W Lc 1 29 � S 49'47'45" E mzw DAY NOW RMERLY OF /� ® 273.68' M NTE GARAGE TOWN SOUTHOLD � / ( / , Q � [ 1J . (ARACNE IE) V /1 v 30 33 131 STO► 13/ sr MAN LLJ Cl d Oc LIMIT aror as 13+ STOP PO'J'I:) J I,2 MPH ROP STOP YEILO TDaf Ankh o m uwr n u: l 114 YEILD TO PEDES'TRWU D1f0P 35' X 60` 3 I Q O c, YIELD TO YEILO TO PEDESTRUNS Z Lc PRPESTRUM PEPESTRISNS I""""1O1"""" ►EOEILLD TO _ p0� U1 b Q C ra 31 YELP TO _ f Artk ro NMI . IT""NAME 13a o p 1 STREET NR PEPERT11W/i 136 oMPOE .P� 1ENNI ON 12 TI, , ` 32 116 " 1} CAUTION IryOO �7 4 ' E oTOP � © Art rO Nxr n U 7 NEPOE Ap4oq , 1 23 PTREETNWE 12e R,N 0N0 Q 95.00 I w (ARkNm TI 1.M 1.0 12 RT� G1• 30 ETWET RAMS J /-�"� "\ 1] 128 •� �" " ,' f AnkxD TO MNR PULE ) FFIN S ET 4 " V 34 109 iOUTAIN Ila 179 11 121 REED I NIGHT I O LIMIT PONv LIMIT NOW/FORMERLY E q 1 MPN FOUTAIN M " WILLIAM M. LY OF l� k WILLIAM F. HEANEY 35 I -- CAUTION KEEP FOUTAIN mom JIM. \ � N r` Rrvn"wRry '— f " 36 YNR I WELCOME O CV S 4221647' 9fi 95 B4 r s3 STOP 9] STOP CAUTION rouTAIN N 49'56'35" W 400.00' NOW;O�RMMERLLY OF STOP ap SEDOE UTAI 114'- YEILD To YEILD To NIIMPIT knm YEILP TD ee 4] LST PRPRSTRUNS RTOP EG D ..' Lr) PEDER MU= M!N 96 92 ET PEDESTNNNE MPN9 d- 'N j' B5 (Ankxm iO uO OM 08 r` 3g nkI ucxr ufjq FOM: 106 PED EESTRIAIN fi4 S711EET NAME STOP LIMIT I V-) �} 39 99 STREET MAYR YEILD To MPH I CO I c t07 ,p5 A kxeO r ua+r naE) PEDESTNWES O d 78 z 40 ETPP STOP ETRRET NMSR 102 !MPH NOW/FORMERLY OF +°1+ S e !WPM 100 ROMAN CA7HOUC CHURCH OF u n n YEILO TO YEILD TO (A kxEP ro r rOE[ SACRED HEART n n STREET RAYS PEDESTRENi PEPEDTRIANN STOP STOP n � LIMIT DTA 7B 41 IIP (ArtkxO a ) — W STOP LOAN YEILD TO oTNEET NAME 69 I I PEDESTRIANS �j L ` 57 Lf) " 42 YEILOTO 5e 6] O ]5 In I PEpESTNNNS 61 O 70 O O 5p 5g 66 7t 7} Lss I F� a =Ln g a c- ( 6f O ez MPH CN r N I 43 LiIT 64 55 6] 6S EMEROANCY N) O 45 64 ACCESS ONLYQ z N' HIP" = DO NOT mom s I I '4 EYEROANCY00 Z (Ank WHY O f> Z L7 ACCEDD ONLY PO NOT ENTER V) Q ? o U ��a „ 2,010. 6 2' 0 I . I o N 49'37 25 W p date, NOW/FORMERIY OF I W NOW/FORMERLY OF I NOW/FORMERLY OF I NOW/FORMERLY OF I NOW/FORMERLY OF i NDW T0RMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF Q NOW/FORMERLY OF OCTOBER 2005 HIGHLAND MOHRNO RT.RP Q DAVIDKA, FRANCIS J. STANLEY JR. STANLEY JR. ALDO kS LOUISE PAUL M.HkLCONCETTA HENRY STAIkKDEBOEWCRAH JOHN k BABEL I J I k DONNA M, I k MARIE C. I I I , I I OO SCaE� I' so'-O" m I I I I ISI I I I I I I� y dh�Nk dvCl KUEHN� project no: SITE SIGNAGE & LIGHTNG PLAN a � a 2500 a � A � ^ —D,I V W DOUBLE GLOBE FUTURE 1 ll = 80 O�c sheet # NOTE; ALL LIGHTING TO BE POSITIONED AS NOT TO GREAT PECONICDAY LS - 4 SINGLE GLOBE FMTURE SHINE ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES KEY MAP draw nq tl�e SCALE: 1" m 0.5 MILE SIGNAGE k LIGHTING i — K J PUTTING GREEN BUNKER 1 NOW/FORMERLY OF ZAHARA, I CHARLES J. & JEAN T. �N z N O T 1f w w w w No �— a N 0 Oo I C w w w w w w WHITE PINE AND LELAND CYPRESS I— r, n HEDGE ROW U n CC w w w w w w w REFER TO SHEET LS-14 FOR ENLARGED PLAN OF THIS SECTION - O W Q w w w w w w w WHITE PINE AND LELAND CYPRESS T m Z x HEDGE ROW 3 BAY y w w w MAINTENANCE cj� ! 1 O C GARAGE V EL p' tr w w w w wLu as S 49'47'45" E I B w w w w w 273.68' O - - - N 0 I LL_ n w w w w wZ cl 2 Q n 2 , ' _ r w w w w w w M w w w w I ,c w w w w NOW/FORMERLY OF 41 V, I 35' X 60' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD w w wAft w w w Ppp o I WHI E PINE AND LELAND CYPRESS w w w P F��p • '� i o HED E ROW a I • TENNIS COURTS N w : � w � w '� c w w w 'o0 w '41 w w �00�R T e w w 14, 95.00' I S 49*47'45" E o b I 95.005.00'' w w I i 0 � B ----- GRIFFING STREET � 71 W 0 • � x Q Li w z o W 1 " 0 G.-'7 0, 0 w w w w a 0 a W 1 - w w w w w Lf date; w w w CN Aucusr 2006 w w w \ ww SLa�e i - 80-0 v wl w I / � "�,^ � '^'..... ., ,, I LnN drawnby; CKUEHN w w w 11 I \ \ checked w by; v w I w w w project no:, 2500 11, N 49o56'35" W 400.00 _PARTIAL OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN 51'IEet # w w w w w w REFER TO SHEET LS-15 FOR SECTION ONE SCALE = 1" = 40'-0" Y w LS - 5- w w �w w • !_ ENLARGED PLAN OF TI115 SECTION _ � drawlnq tyle w w w w w w OVERALL LANDCSAPE I i PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 4 Alt z Ul LIRIOPE/ 00 L GO I ASTIBE W I I� N HOSTA —J UCN FOUNTAIN GRASS I.I BOX WOOD (D Or � — X3�: x m Z ¢ ' ILEX T LI- HEDGE ROW OPTIONA SCR N D PORCH , n 1 � oho ELoU) LIEX w a Go _�(_�/j F— I LL l UN Z lO ORNAMENTAL GRASSES N FOUNTAIN GRASS omlNc RM KITCHEN ILEX (_ V v ,ecm BEDROOM HOLLY HOSTA R FOUNTAIN GRASS unu" ® MSTR BATH FAMILY RM. MAIDEN GRASS HOLLY HOSTA HOLLY BATH HI OSTA ® GUEST RM � T ILEX n FOUNTAIN GRASS ASTIBE I AI NDRY LIRIOPE/ o �n Ell] 0oo HOLLY MOUNTAIN LAUREL c �a 0 g 2 -moo Wn m MAIDEN GRASS C.CAR r.ARAr.F � LIRIOPE/ HOSTA 2 ASTIBE w Y HYDRANGEA ' HOSTA C:) >- o 3 HOSTA J LJ O U z O N FOUNTAIN GRASS Q j U HOSTA h 0 S U Q- +` date: AUGUST 2006 KOUSA DOOGWOOD scale: LIRIOPE/ 1/4' = V-D" ASTIBE drawn by: ORNAMENTAL GRASSES C.W.Kuehn ASTILBE checked by: LIRIOP 'F JUNIPER protect no: 24000 COBBLE STONE CURB COBBLE STONE' CURB ALL STREET TREES TO BE SPACE AT 40'-0" D.C. sheet # TYPICAL UNIT LANDSCAPING COBBE STONE DRIVEWAY WITH ALTERNATING SUGAR MAPLE, ARISTOCRAT PEAR LS - 12 APRON W/ HERING—BONE AND SWEET GUM MIX PAVEF PATTERN WITH SINGLE SOLDIER COURSER drawlrq We BOARDER LANDSCAPE PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "B" i I I I EDGE OF POND z R BRICK PAVER PATIO LRIOPE/ HOSTA = 0000 ASTILBE BOXWOOD W OD I � N U � N � W C ILEX x 3�: x HEDGE ROW ILEX T m z L+ HEDGE ROW 1 BKn NOOK OPTIONAL SCREENED PORCH l„/ ) U O Of O d w � aa00 � I FOUNTAIN GRASS �/ Q O N Z Lo FAMILY RM. N n BRICK PAVER PATIO HOLLY MSTR BEDROOM v MAIDEN GRASS KTCHEN HOSTA HOLLY HOSTA &Alli FOUNTAIN GRASS DINING RM. ® MSTR BATH m Eill ILEX HOLLY O ¢g1 o MAIDEN GRASS LAUNDRY HOSTA ORNAMENTAL GRASSES 1M ` o � c HYDRANGEA « — HOSTA �a HOSTA LIRIOPE/ - CREPE MYRTLE 6ASTIBE GOLD TIP MOUNTAIN LAUREL MAIDEN GRASS Y ILEX w �eR GARAGE � OC I HEDGE ROW O >-0 MOUNTAIN LAUREL HOSTA 3�: ASTILBE U z O �, I LIRIOPE F— N .Q � � li it �y O TIGAR GRASS O= o - o BOXWOOD w - LIRIOPEe U ASTILB date: AucuST zoos COBBLE STONE CURB scale: COBBLE STONE CURB MOUNTAIN LAUREL t/a — —D FOUNTAIN GRASS drawn by: MADEN GRASS ALL STREET TREES TO BE SPACE AT 40'-0" O.C. C.W.Kuehn COBBLE STONE DRIVEWAY HOSTA WITH ALTERNATING SUGAR MAPLE, ARISTOCRAT PEAR checked by; APRON W/ HERING—BONE AND SWEET GUM MIX 11 PAVER PATTERN WITH SINGLE SOLDIER COURSER pro�ectno: BOARDER 24000 sheet # TYPICAL UNIT LANDSCAPING Ls - 13 drawlnq We LANDSCAPE PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN — UNIT "D" milli V— � -GAAQ O- I . a� LELAND CYPRESS 0 6'-0" O.C. • "— �/ . I WHITE PINE 0 6'-0" O.C. NA 1 I SELF CLOSING SELF F'. 1 � � �\J � I LOCKINGOATES - SELF LELAND CYPRESS 0 8'-0" O.C. WHITE PINE 0 8'-0" O.C. ♦ ♦ = DO ♦ • w DO I •.•^ .♦r' ' KOUSA DOOGWOODW PO • •. M y Y P LIRIOPE/ .•• \ Lp >- " - ♦i AZALEA :• • LELAND CYPRESS 0 6'-0" O.C. - O w ORNAMENTAL GRASSES `, WHITE PINE 0 6'-D" O.C. I m z LL HOSTA � \ h�� ^.•^^ �^..... ..�r \ 0 0 .��,.•. ^..^ �^ ^.♦^ HOSTA LIRIOPE5�r '•, ',•���'". . .►• ��,•r •^^•••• ASTIBE \ \ JLL �l O N ^r Z N LIRIOPE/ ASTIBE •.• // \\ LO rrrr AZALEA HOSTA .•♦.•• HOSTA 4' DEEP POOL '♦♦r BOXWOOD ^.•• •♦� •. LOWERIN CHERRY ASTILBE ♦♦ L _- LIRIOPE/ �.� ORNAMENTAL GRASSES ♦♦ i• O LIRIOPE/ ♦• • ASTIBE i • AMERICAN ABBROVITAE 0 4'-0" O.C. ♦ • b 1' ATL 1 • y ♦♦♦♦♦•♦• • • —^'� INDOOR POOL HYDRANGEA r- — —0 0 0 O r"•"r"".... ....^^�..^ BOXWOOD ASTIBE SELF CIACNINo ' GATES KOUSA DOOGWO !' LIRIOPE/ 0 O ASTIBE HOSTA KOUSA DOOGWOOD ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Idoh HOSTA , F FERN 0 aJi• i FLOWERING CHERRY Tall O[ 11D 0o AMERICA BROVITAE 0 4'-0" 0. N ," CLUBHOUSE KITCHEN , _ 0 0 HYDRANGEA i = 0 o DELIVERY w � i VLj Z N ]NO ERRYOpUNGIR9 i Q 040 FFICE w O LIBRARY LOUNGE LIRIOPE/ CARD ROOM WAIL STORAGE O W ASTIBE OFFICE ILEX / a = v ORN L G SSES ' i dare: AUGUST 2006 STA ILEX ' scale; ORNAMEN G SSE LIRIOP O O 1/32' = i'-O" AS KOUSA DOOGWOOD i L P I � drawn by; AST ORtJAMENTAL GRASSES C.W.Kuehn I l checked by KOUSAI DOOGWOOD da � i T project no: e , 24000 ----------------- T sheet # LS - 14 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES drawlnq tide ASTIBE/ ASTIBE LANDSCAPE PLAN \O \ elo z _ 00 00 LID 04 Lil GD I Lo CN W � M XIX / 1 m W0 wU o � EL 00 KOUSA DOOGWOOD ISTIIBE/ I 11 LJ_ `� Z . Z LN O . AD N ORNAMENTAL GR SES LIRIOPE/ � "" CID ASTIBE 1 1 f \I COBBLE STONE x RON 1 � 1 � / N / 1 / 1 / 1 / I I 1 , I 1 1 PRNAMENTAL GRASSES ----- ---- +., A TIBE , ------ ORNAMENTAL �`� ,' e GRASSES LIRIOPE/ ASTISEKOUSA DOOGWOOD / ORNAMENTAL GRASSES adj ORNAMENTAL !H GRASSES .2 I LIRIOPE/ LIRIOPE/ oe ASTIBE ASTISE HOSTA o y� HOSTA TKO - xw/APH&T OCT VINxLEx ORNAMENTAL li GRASSE —WELCOME TO" GROUND SIGN FAxp.N Y ExnfAx 0 1 PxEnIYS NNtt 51°IN° U O x P fPli C°W 13' x xN LJ N RH U Z 7 xxx r—owls � O ®¢ xx N+nx,sn Pnu.0 \ \ d W l` r BNIM YeEEB \ W 00 COBBLE STONE CD 0 ORION lc<U I— = O SIDE ELEVATION END ELEVATION N L ~ v 1 o z � � n U xs-v IF T date, —T 17COBBLE STONE MFON I AUGUST 2006 5cd e; GUARD BOOTH �' °' 1/32• = V-O" I drawn by; 1/8' - 1,-0x OFFICE GUARD BOOTH — — § N C.W.Kuehn checked 64; 1 1 project no. zaaoo 12 Sheet # FLOOR PLAN �, - L S - 1 5 LL 1 - JJ % drawlnq We / LANDSCAPE PLAN / Plate 3 Yield Map Nelson & Pope, Last Revised 11/17/2008 • • ► ► NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF ► BERTHA KURCZEWSKI ESTATE OF — ► — FRANK MACHINCHICK 1901.44' (DEED) 1904.80' ACTUAL S38'30'50"E (DEED) 538'24'20"E (ACTUAL) ww. NOW/FORMERLY OF Z L £gin £m CHARLES J. & JEAN T. RECHARGE y N L_ BASIN/ o w 537'04'40'E 273.68'0. NOW/FORMERLY OF ��OT J o N TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 150 I °� N ► I I � ► I inh••.mi3o T Df' 40"5'117-114E NOW/FORMERLY OF 95.00NN N1 G QWILLIAM M. BEEBE 110 2 ^ I I I - I & WILLIAM F. HEANEY cr " N N w Ut fJ, — 14 � I L10 " DRAINAGE <'J � I I I 7 T -7 T -7 � -7 � — N+ RESERVE w `LSO I I I I I I I I ►I _ o NOW/FORMER OF S37-13'30"F- D) 40000' ARTO LTD. S7'04'30"E ACTUAL 21.47oN I ^ OI I I 0 . z NOW/FORMERLY OF LLI 1C,-- iq ►- f/ 0!/ I ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF LL, I �OI I 80 I� SACRED HEARTW I ISI NOW/FORMERLY OF r- M LONG ISLAND VINEYARDS INC. \ 750' N w o EXISTING PRIVATE ---0 m DRAINAGE, 59/ WATER WELL / \ \ SERVE/ (TYPICAL FOR 6) N36'54'20"W I I ' OI 12009.22' (ACII L) I 150' SANITARY RADIUS W OI O FROM CENTER OF Q WATER WELL NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF I NOW/FORMERLY OF ► NOW/FORMERLY OF I NOW/FORMERLY OF ► NOW/FORMERLY OF I NOW/FORMERLI' OF ► W I NOW/FORMERLY OF (TYPICAL FOR 6) HIGHLAND ROAD CORP. I 4J I COOK, DIVINEY, DEMBROSKY, DEMBROSKY, BARSALI, SHELBYE BOR QUARTICELD, ► & MOHRING RT. DAVID A. FRANCIS J. STANLEY JR. STANLEY JR. ALDO & LOUISE PAUL M. & ClONCETTA HENRY & DEBORAH 0= JOHN & ISABEL K & DONNA M. & MARIE C, ► � � ► I I I I l <' 0 o ; N V SITE INFORMATION " D GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ZONE IV(600 GAL/ACRE) ALLOWABLE SANITARY SITE FLOW: 600 GAL/ACRE x 45.99 ACRES =27,594 GPD y al " Qp NOTES: 1. SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR 50,000 GPD, BI 2. MINIMUM LOT AREA IS 10,000 SF. O` , o' 1 1Fn-0S REVISED AS PER D98 COMMBMB P� a ! 3. MINIMUM LOT DEPTH REQUIRED IS 80', ACTUAL MINIMUM IS 83.67. a�7� < �SM Sr: a 4. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH REQUIRED IS 60', ACTUAL MINIMUM IS 60'. \\ No. DATE N //\/ YIELD MAP DWR BY. KDZ o r� /c D9CYi'D BYE KCZ THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOl CwDs'' AX o C 9RUATED AT -' CUTCHOGUE DATE 1-5 W GRAPHIC SCALE . GREAT PECONIC BAY JOB No: 00026 ~ ' !W TOWN Or SOLI.1•IyOLQ oYPI"OLK OOYNTY. NGW YOl1K goo o ao �m zna FILE No., 717-9Y7-4 � KEY MAP NELSON & POPE � , I 1 SCDHSB: 510-03-0005 16PENQINEER9 9l1RVEYOR9 IN FMSCTM1k 1000-102-01-33.3 SCALE: T - 0.5 MILE 612 WALT WH AN ROAD.M�VILLE.N.Y.W47-0" SCALE+ r-too' o 1 Inch = 100 fG P.E. SfAL G S/GNA7URE " caM)427-MOS PAX coon♦z�26/ 'i' _n (� I Plate 4 Conceptual Plan for Alternative 2 Nelson & Pope, Last Revised 4/21/2008 • • a V`a YwXY YpL I r > F I � Y I � R NOW/FORMERLY OF �� — — �� ESTATE OF I NOW/FORMERLY OF A". O� FRANK MACHINCHICK BERTHA KURCZEWSKI � I $ 'gQO I 1901.44' (DEED) / \ 1904.80' (ACTUAL) - y �— - - — — — — — S38'30'50"E (DEED) - - - - - - - - - - - - +. (,n — I BAY –_ (BEAT PEulIIC Q� S38'24'20"E (ACTUAL) I _ - - - - - - ---- _______ `\w(J� — — — — — — - - - - - - - - ---------------------- ------------------------------ ------ ------------------------------------------ ------- ----------- ( T MA1P -------------------------- ------------ -------- / LP scaL> Z (,,1 SETBACK LINE (TYP) --------------- ----- -------- _--- --- (� 350 ----- B A C A B C AF ORD BLE W (tYPI 1 C A g C A B C A 1 m; ORD BLE AF OR BLE ------ AF --- - - -- O yl � ' ' \ � _ _ _____ _ __ _ ,5000 SS.00' N O. m , *1, _ ____ _ __ _ __ _ ___ — — — ✓ O NOW/FORMD(LY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF m'1 _ ____________ __ _ _______ __ ____ __ _ __ _ I STP , ,]TAKES xd R.FW L TOWN OF SOUTHOLD N Y m` It O I U; 7 cT 1^ \ 537'04'40"E - - 273.68' _ Z O � zao oo' — 11 / MAINIZANCE (0 o N I J A B C A B i A B C A B C A \ 11 \ s / / FFi. VO �` O I s (DS T'TI O (, It ` �� ` p0a• � I y � I N It i s 10 I TENNIS EU 5875 ` 837'04'40I'E Li D 95.00' `" ei 2GRIPPING 1 m <n cn STREET 01 ; ; ; cn 01 1 NN 0' 1 1 I I It 4U1 2 Ln Ln NOW/FORMERLY OF .P- j %" ', 1, U POND O o WILUAM M. BEEBE �- (T 1 `1 & WILLIAM F. HEANEY 01mNrAN + 1 , I I I I �vAmlunoJ I y9 Q , ,, y a , D �.../' I $ r y ; I I O1 V Ell L11 S37'13'30"E (DEED) ` .1 I I 537'04'30"E (ACTUAL)-221.47' I, 03 - - - On a D ¢ I i �N37'13'30"W 400.00' n r0 I � v1 I LLI -------------1, I I I I I D NOW/FORMERLY ID O I 1 , I �' I ROMAN CATHOLIC v NI i 1( 11 I ' I ' CHURCH OF SACRED HEART co �1 I P - q 11 1 jAl',j i d0'/ A B li A B C A B C A B C ( B C A B C q q C AZL--- - ----- -� ------ ---- --- -- ---- - -- ------- - ----- - - ----- ---- - �5\ (TVP)Z 350' ' \ b V I� I n - S i 0 I O >� ` ----- IHy N� Z I { C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B A B C A B C A B C A cn ---- N 0 1---------------------- --- --' -- -------NE (TV) ---""" '------------'-""--- --_"-----------'---- "'---__-"'------- ----"-'-"'_'--------'-'-'-'-"-'----- -' ------------- � SETBACK LINE TYP O 1 EMERGENCY m (': O II ACCESS ROAD s m o �N --I - - - -I - - - - -r- - - - - -r - - --7 - - - - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N36'54'20"W - - - - - - -- I I 2009.51' (DEED)I I I I I I l fJOW/FORMERLY OF I Q I BARSALI, 2009.22' (ACTUAL) NOW FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF I NOW/FORMERLY OF I NO DE�MOBROSKY, OF I NO DEMOBROSKY, OF I ALDO & LOUISE I PAUL M.H&aYRLY OF CONCETTA I NOW/FORMERLY W/FOIUMEWICZ, F I 0 HIGHLAND ROAD CORP. I w I DAVID A. DIVINEY, STANLEY JR. & ORMERLY & MOHRING RT. I Q I & DONNA M. I FRANCIS J. I I STANLEY JR. I I I HENRY DEBORAH I I NO OF pUARTiCELU, J I & MARIE C. I I I I I = I JOHN & ISABEL W I PARKING CALCULATIONS: rn REQUIRED: SITE COVERAGE: m I SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING: 2 SPACES PER DWELLING PONDS 5,023.70 SF = 0.25% 112 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNrr - 224 SPACES ZONING DATA: LANDSCAPING TOTAL 1,350,221.84 SF = 67.41% FERTILIZER DEPENDENT - 640,221.84 SF UNIT TYPES AFFORDABLE UNITS: 1.5 SPACES PER UNIT NON-FERTIUZER DEPENDENT - 710,000 SF ZONING: HAMLET DENSITY (HD) 13 UNITS x 1.5 SPACES/ UNITS - 20 ROAD, PARKING, AND PAVEMENT 208,430.04 SF = 10.40% SITE DATA: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR 1 FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS: TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED FOR UNITS = 244 SPACES SIDEWALK, T.C., PATIO, POOL. AND GAZEBO 54,939.05 SF - 2.74% BUILDING 318,133.29 SF = 15.88% B C SCTM: 1000-102-01-33.3 REQUIRED: PROVIDED: COMMUNITY CENTER: - TOTALDIRNEY 68,563.41 SF = 0.00% AFF F ORD BLE TOTAL 2,003,311.33 SF = 10D.00% ZONED: HAMLET DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZE (SQ. T) 10,000 2,003.311.33 SF (45.9897 AC) 1 SPACE PER 300 NI OF RECREATIONAL FACILITY A LOT WIDTH (FEET) 60 218.51 5 SPACES PER TENNIS COURT � SITE AREA: 2,003,311.33SF = 45.9897 ACRES LOT DEPTH (FEET) BO 2205.29 COMMUNITY CENTER G.F.A. 6,085 SF/ 300 = 21 SPACES NUMBER OF UNITS 125 FRONT YARD (FEET) 30 212.07 COVERED PATIO 900 SF / 300 3 SPACES SIDE YARD (FEET) 15 35.0 POOL 1,160 SF / 300 = 4 SPACES "• NUMBER OF BUILDINGS = 119 (INCLUDING COMMUNITY CENTER, STP AND MAINTANANCE GARAGE) BOTH SIDE YARDS (FEET) 30 70.0 TENNIS COURT 2 COURTS X 5/CT = 10 SPACES n REAR YARD (FEET) 30 35.0 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING: 38 SPACES v SCHOOL DISTRICT / 9 LIVABLE FLOOR AREA (SO.FT./UNrT) 850 LIVABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ.FT./UNIT) LOADING ZONE: GRAPHIC SCALE UNIT A 850 2504 Na DATE REMON BY. m ♦00 GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ZONE IV (600 GAL/ACRE) UNIT B 850 1930 COMMU RT CENTER WITH FLOOR AREA OF 5,000 TO 25,000 SF loo 0 3a loo zao 1 BERTH _ n --- ALLOWABLE SANITARY SITE FLOW: 2,003,311.33 5F/ 20,000 SF/ UNIT = 100 UNITS UNIT C 850 2717 ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT PLAN °N�"'� I>as ll -- 100 UNITS x 75% - 75 UNITS X 300 GPD / UNIT = 22,500 GPD UNIT D 850 2725 UNITE 850 3110 PROVIDED: wR DSf;H'D BY: CWK AFFORDABLE UNIT 25% 1135 THE HAMLET AT CLITCHOGUE CH('D BY, SJR ( IN FEET ) 35 18.622 SINGLE FAMILY DEEACHED DWELLING: 2 SPACES PER DWELLING IN GARAGE LOT COVERAGE (R) 2 1/2 SEE AICHITECTURAL PLANS 112 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNITS - 224 SPACES BURRING HEIGHT (FEET) CIfT�r`FIOQ��E DATE 07/16/05 2i NUMBER OF STORIES SEE AICHITECfURAL PLANS OFF-STREET PARKING FOR AFFORDABLE UNITS = 2fi SPACES a NOTE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED FOR ALL UNITS = 250 SPACES JOB Nw 00028 THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE OWNER: APPLICANT: UNITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE NOT AGE RESTRICTED T'�w^( �� -p(-�' �u�rouc oou(vrr. wi�w vonlc COMMUNITY CENTER: PROPERTY OF NELSON & POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR RLE Na' ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED IN PARKING LOT - 45 SPACES (INCLUDING 2 HANDICAP SPACES) NELSON 6. POPE ' 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS NOCRO, LTD. THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE, LLC LOADING ZONE PROVIDED: 1 BERTH OAS 0°°1-W WILL BE PROSECUTED. 140 EAST MAIN ST. 1721-D NORTH OCEAN AVENUE 572 W3 NE=ERS ELJ ,MyYORE3 NOTE: STALLS FOR STP SITE NOT INCLUDED IN PARKING CALCULATIONS. 57z WALT wHOwAa Rono,McLveJ.e,My.ma7-aee SCALE T-KP $ RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 MEDFORD, NY 11763 P.E. SEAL & 576WA7VRE (661)427-5665 PAX(M)425-1257 i; I! 4'.PP' uw"s�iisu RM. srsmvO NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF © P OO ESTATE OF BERTHA KURCZEWSKI FRANK MACHINCHICK I 1901.44' (DEED) 1904.80' (ACTUAL) 19 S38'30'50"E (DEED) S38'24'20"E (ACTUAL) �nLin a A -'( : .,. .:,.,::.;�, „F;s.- 58 70, , - a� - „ .98 „- 112 g aj Y OF Q N Iy NOW/EORMERL / DL 29 42 - - N ZAHARA. 0. 0 O" j x p`� CHARLES J. & JEAN T. KEYMAP yU: p n Tnc 537'04'40"E 273.68 SCALE 1"=4,000' /F C TOV OF SOUTHOLD ri0 POOL :,4 g NTENm LA x M 3 CIE RECHARGE COURT uI BASIN m o y COMMUNITY `r m v CENTER OPEN SPACE / NATURAL VEGETATION 0 ET EY :0 ET x vS37'04'40'ENON-FERTIUZER DEPENDENT LANDSCAPING 95.00' x 1 1 CIU) N GRIPPING STREET N NO Os 35 4B 82 78 90 104 118 g o O 01 tOit E E LAWN / PLANTINGS ID CIE NOW U FERTILIZER DEPENDENT LANDSCAPING WIWAM M. BEEBE/FORMERLY OF 'P ® N�' m v & WILLIAM F. HEANEY 2 ✓ 38 49 83 77 105 119 128 lzlz D O 537'13'30"E (DEED) r' ©EM EY ' O o NOW/FORMERLY OF To S3 ' 4' 0" 22 .4 ' 729 133 N3713'30"W 400.00' v W OO NOW/FORMERLY OF O N •N ROMAN CATHOLICCIE CHURCH OF oR1' 136 � SACRED HEART � � g z tzs NOW/FORMERLY OF 41 132 137 ONG ISLAND VINEYARDS _ Y INC. = 40EIE CT • O _ zo 14 28 6 P Z 55 69 83 97 111 125 139 'ri�sioir'+occr, _ N T9 20 20.0' o C° $ _ M - 3 UNITS N36'54'20"W 2009.51' (DEED) p id 28' ROAD (TW.) 4 UNITS 2009.22' (ACTUAL) \ VILLAGE GREEN NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF Q �J NOW/FORMERLY OF COOK, NOW/FORMERLY OF NOW/FORMERLY OF BARSAU, SHELBY, NOW/FORMERLY OF D' HIGHLAND ROAD CORP. W DAVID A. NOW/FORMERLY OF DEMBROSKY, DEMBROSKY, ALDO $ LOUISE PAUL M. & CONCETTA STASIUKIEWICZ, DIVINEY, STANLEY JR. STANLEY JR. HENRY & DEBORAH NOW/FORMERLY OF & MOHRING RT. Z I & DONNA M. FRANCIS J. I I QUARTICEW, TYPICAL PLOT LAYOUT J & MARIE C. d JOHN & ISABEL !n SCALE 1' 50' W � DID I ` SITE DATA: SCTM: 1000-102-01-33.3 SIDEWALK ZONED: HAMLET DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-- - - RESIDENTIAL SITE AREA: 2,003,311.33SF = 45.9897 ACRES j UNIT I NUMBER OF UNITS - 129 (INCL. 14 AFFORDABLE) PARKING CALCULATIONS: VILLAGE DRIVEWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT dl 9 REQUIRED: GREEN GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ZONE IV (600 GAL/ACRE) SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING: 2 SPACES PER DWELLINGj 14.00' 8.00' 5.00' 20.00' 50.00' METES AND OBTAINED FROM SURVEY PLANS BY PECONIC SURVEYORS, ALLOWABLE SANITARY SITE FLOW: 2,003,311.33 SF/ 20,000 SF/ UNIT I = 100.165 AFFORDABLE UNITS: 1.5 SPACES PER UN PC DATED APRIL 18, 2007 100.165 x 75% x 300 GPD/UNIT - 22,537.25 GPD 125 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNIT = 250 SPACES (2) 4 UNI BUILDING X 1.5 - 8 X 2 12 SPACES j (2) 3 UNI BUILDING X 1.5 = 5 X 2 10 SPACES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED FOR UNITS 272 SPACES TYPICAL SECTION ZONING DATA: clue HOUSE: SCALE 1•=1o• 1 SPACE PER 300 SF OF RECREATIONAL FACILITY SITE COVERAGE: 5 SPACES PER TENNIS COURT ZONING: HAMLET DENSITY (HD) CLUB HOUSE 6,400 SF / 300 = 22 SPACES EBF PERCENTAGE ) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR 1 FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS: POOL 1,160 SF / 300 - 4 SPACES BUILDING 267,200 S.F. 13.345 PROVIDED: TENNIS COURT 2 COURTS X 5/CT - 10 SPACES DRIVEWAYS 88,094 S.F. 4.405 6 REQUIRED: RECHARGE BASIN 77,210 S.F. 3.355 ( LOT SIZE SQ. FT.) 20,000 2,003,311.33SF _ (45.9897 AC) TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING: � 38 SPACES ROADS, PARKING, & PAVEMENT 307,045 S.F. 15.335 i LOT WIDTH (FEE ) 75 2405 29 LOADING ZONE: SIDEWALK, TENNIS COURT, GAZEBO, & POOL 63,469 S.F. 3.175 LOT DEPTH (FEET) 120 212.07 COMMUNITY CENTER WITH FLOOR AREA OF 5,000 TO 25,000 SF LANDSCAPING 1,200,293 S.F. 59.915 FRONT YARD (FEET) 35 35.0 1 BERTH TOTAL SITE AREA: 2,OD3,311 S.F. 100.005 ' SIDE YARD (FEET) 25 70,0 I BOTH SIDE YARDS (FEET) 30 35.0 PROVIDED: REAR YARD (FEET) 35 UNABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ.FT./UNIT) LIVABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ.FT./UNIT 35 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING: 2 SPACES PER DWELLING IN GARAGE LOT COVERAGE (5) 255 AFFORDABLE UNITS: 1.5 SPACES PER UNIT IN OFF STREET PARKING F BUILDING HEIGHT (FEET) 35 SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS Na DATE FEY" an E GRAPHIC SCALE NUMBER OF STORIES 2 1/2 SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 125 BUILDINGS X 2 SPACES/GARAGE = 250 SPACES (2) 4 UNIT BUILDING X 1.5 = 6 SPACES X 2 - 12 SPACES ALTERNATE_ :o0 SITE PLAN OWN.B`, L00 i 0 ED ,Do 200 IOD (2 3 UNIT BUILDING X 1.5 - 5 SPACES X 2 - IQ $PAGES DEIGN.BY, BJR TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED - 272 SPACES CLUB HOUSE: THE HERBAGE AT CUTCHOGUE DATE, 4/21/01 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED IN PARKING LOT = 39 SPACES INCLUDING 2 HANDICAP SPACES �"''�AT ( IN FEET ) LOADING ZONE PROVIDED: 1 BERTH CUTCHOGUE CHK'D B 4 0JR DATE, 11005 OWNER: APPLICANT: [` NOTE CIIIISI 1000, mmC rjON 10II. ®LOCK 01, LOT 00.0 THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF NELSON & POPE. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR NOCRO, LTD. THE HERITAGE AT CUTCHOGUE, LLCNELSON & POPE FdB Na ADDITIONS TO THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A VIOLATION OF SECTION 140 EAST MAIN ST. 1721 —D NORTH OCEAN AVENUE QINEERS & SURVEYORS wi WHITMAN ROI MawuJe NY.mm2tm 7208 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. INFRINGEMENTS RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 MEDFORD, NY 11763 CAoa wILL BE PROSECUTED. EN ) siz % scale rhOD j r lap (63017/-5x86 Fv1X(e59 427 'vePo wwwn.wonpaP..eam sHEET� t of t I c Plate 5 Conceptual Plan for Alternative 3 Nelson & Pope, Last Revised 7/16/2008 • •