HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-54.-4-19OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.
Southold, NY 11971
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
Jim King, President
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry and Scott Hilary, LWRP Coordinators
Date: October 1,2008 (REVISED from LWRP review dated September 23, 2008)
Proposed Coastal Erosion and Wetland Permit ROBERT G. BOMBARA
SCTM#54-4-19
Young & Young on behalf of ROBERT G. BOMBARA requests a Wetland Permit & Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a
single-family dwelling, detached garage, swimming pool and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities. Located:
1725 North Sea Dr., Southold. SCTM#54-4-19
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code
and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the
LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our
recommendation that the proposed actions are INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Town of Southold LWRP
policy standards and NOT IN COMPLIANCE with Chapter 275, WETLANDS AND SHORELINE and Chapter 111,
COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS. Therefore, the actions are INCONSISTENT with the LWRP.
The purpose of Chapter 275~ WETLANDS AND SHORELINE is to regulate wetlands in order to maintain and
contribute to the following resource area values and the attributes and functions they posses: flood control[ erosion and
sediment control~ storm dama~.e prevention and water pollution control. In addition~ the following resource area values
shall be maintained and protected: prevention of flood damage by limiting of development in flood hazard areas~
prevention of damage to structures and natural resources as a result of erosion~ protection of coastal ecosystems~
minlmi~,ino the impact of new development~ restoration and/or expansion on the resource area values listed above.
§ 275-3 Findings; purpose; jurisdiction; setbacks.
B. Purpose. It is the intention of this chapter to ensure for the citizens of the Town of SouthoM the protection,
preservation, proper maintenance and use of its wetlands, giving due consideration to the reasonable economic and social
development of the Town. In addition, the Town Board declares that it is the intention of this chapter to regulate the type and
placement of fixed and floating piers and docks for the protection, preservation, proper maintenance and use of its waters and
wetlands. Therefore, the Town Board declares that the regulation of the wetlands' of the Town of SouthoM is essential to the
health, safety and welfare of the people of the Town of Southold. The wetlands shall be regulated in order to maintain and
contribute to the following resource area values and the attributes and functions they possess: protection of public and private
water supply; groundwater; flood control; erosion and sedimentation control; storm damage prevention; water pollution
control;fisheries; shellfish, including spawner sanctuaries; wildlife habitat; agriculture; aquaculture; aesthetics; public access
and recreation. In addition, the following resource area values shall be maintained and protected: prevention of flood damage
by limiting of development in flood hazard areas; prevention of damage to structures and natural resources as a result of
erosion; improvement of water quality; protection and enhancement of existing vegetation cover in order to maintain water
quality and wildlife habitat: protection of wildlife, waterfowl, and plant habitat and the maintenance of existing populations
and species diversity; prevention of loss or degradation of critical wildlife and plant habitat; prevention of new stormwater
runoff discharge and the improvement of existing stormwater runoff discharges; protection of coastal ecosystems which support
the continued viability of harvestable shellfish and finfish habitat; public access to water and lan& improvement of
groundwater recharge; and the minimization of the impact of new development, restoration and/or expansion on the resource
area values listed above.
The purpose of Chapter 111~ COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS is to regulate~ in coastal areas~ land use and
development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective
features and other natural resources and to protect human life. In addition~ the purpose of Chapter 111 is to regulate
new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from coastal hazard areas.
§ 111-4. Purpose.
The Town of SouthoM hereby assumes the responsibility and authority to implement and administer a Coastal Erosion
Management Program within its jurisdiction pursuant to Article 34 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law. In
addition, it is the purpose of this chapter to:
Establish standards and procedures for minimizing and preventing damage to structures from coastal flooding and
erosion and to protect natural protective features and other natural resources.
Regulate, in coastal areas subject to coastal flooding and erosion, land use and development activities so as to
minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural
resources and to protect human life.
C.
Regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from areas of active
erosion and the impact of coastal storms to ensure that these structures are not prematurely destroyed or
damaged due to improper siting, as well as to prevent damage to natural protective features and other natural
resources.
Restrict public investment in services, facilities or activities which are likely to encourage new permanent development
in erosion hazard areas.
Regulate the construction of erosion protection structures in coastal areas subject to serious erosion to assure that
when the construction of erosion protection structures is justified, their construction and operation will minimize or
prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, private and public property, natural protective features and
other natural resources.
4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards.
Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion
hazards.
1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new
development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical.
The proposed actions do not have a functional relationship to coastal waters and therefore is not a water-dependent use
pursuant to § 275-2.
§ 275-2 Definitions; word usage.
WATER-DEPENDENT USES - An activity which can only be conducted on, in, over or adjacent to a water body because
such activity requires direct access to that water body, and which involves, as an integral part of such activity, the ase of the
water. The uses include, but are not limited to commercial and recreational fishing and boating facilities, finfish and shellfish
processing, fish storage and retail and wholesale fish marketing facilities, waterfront dock facilities, shipyards and boat-
building facilities, navigation aides, basins and channels, industrial uses dependent upon waterborne transportation or
requiring large volumes of cooling or processing water and which cannot reasonably be located or operated at an inland site,
and uses which primarily provide general public access to marine or tidal waters.
No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically
allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8.
The proposed actions are located entirely within the coastal erosion ha79rd area and the primary dune~ a natural
protective feature. A primary dune is defined in § 111-6 Definitions as a natural protective feature.
NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE- A nearshore area, beach, bluff, primary dune, secondary dune or marsh and their
vegetation.
PRIMAR Y DUNE -- The most waterward major dune where there are two or more parallel dunes within a coastal area. Where
there is only one dune present, it is the "primary" one. Occasionally one or more relatively small dune formations exist
waterward of the primary dune. These smaller formations will be considered to be part of the "primary dune"for the purposes
of this chapter. The waterward limit of a primary dune is the landward limit of its fronting beach. The landward limit of the
primary dune is 25feet landward of its landward toe.
Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard
Areas.
Provide sufficient lot depth to allow relocation of structures and maintenance of required
setbacks over a period of thirty years.
A site visit of the property of Robert G. Bombara SCTM#54-4-19 was conducted on October 17~ 2007. In attendance at
the site visit among others~ were representatives of the Town of Southold Board of Trustees~ LWRP Coordinator Mark
Terry and NYS DEC's Environment Program Specialist Robert McDonough~ which confirmed that the proposed
actions are entirely located seaward of the CEHA line and within a primary dune (*see attached letter referencing the
same~ dated April 15~ 2008~ signed by Robert McDonough~ Environmental Program Specialist-Coastal Erosion
Management Section*).
4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features.
Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced.
Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited.
A. No development is permitted in nataral protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant
portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. Natural protective features area nearshore areas', beaches, dunes, bluffs, and wetlands
and associated natural vegetation.
The natural protective feature area as defined in § 111-6 Definitions is a land and/or water area containing natural
protective features such as a primary dune.
NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE AREA -- A land and/or water area containing natural protective features the
alteration of which might reduce or destroy the protection afforded other lands against erosion or high water or lower
the reserve of sand or other natural materials' available to replenish storm losses through natural processes.
New construction is prohibited in natural protective feature areas (primary dune). Only nonmaior additions to
existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to § 111-13.
§ 111-13. Dune area.
Dunes prevent overtopping and store sand for coastal processes. High, vegetated dunes provide a greater degree of protection
than low, unvegetated ones. Dunes are of the greatest protective value during conditions of storm-induced high water. Because
dunes often protect some of the most biologically productive areas as well as developed coastal areas, their protective value is
especially great. The key to maintaining a stable dune system is the establishment and maintenance ofbeachgrass or other
vegetation on the dunes and assurance ora supply of nourishment sand to the dunes.
The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in dune areas:
A. In primary dune areas:
(1) Excavating, grading or mining of primary dunes is prohibited.
(2) Clean sand ora compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited Any deposition requires a
coastal erosion management permit.
(3) All depositions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be
placed so as to increase the size of, or restore, a dune or dune area.
(4) Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific
wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department.
(5) Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management
permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on the
primary dune.
(6) Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the
walerward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their
fronting beaches.
The distance from the proposed actions to the natural protective feature (primary dune} is 0 feet~ a minimum setback
distance of 100 feet is required pursuant to Chapter § 275-3. Findings~ purpose~ ]urisdiction~ setbacks. Please require
that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policies to the greatest extent practicable~ minimizing
damao, e or destruction to man-made property~ natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect
human life.
Policy 6 Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem
6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands.
A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the $outhoM Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations
for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction
1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions.
§ 275-3 Findings; purpose; jurisdiction; setbacks.
C. Jurisdiction: The following areas are subject to protection under Chapter 275 of the Code of Southold.
(1) Any freshwater wetland, tidal wetland, beach, bluff, dune, flat, marsh, swamp, wet meadow, bog, or vernal
pool;
D. Setbacks.
1) The following minimum setbacks apply to any and all operations proposed on residential property within the
jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees:
(a) Wetland boundary.
[I] Residence: 100 feet.
If the Agency, Town of Southold Board of Trustees makes a contrary determination of consistency~ the Agency shall
elaborate in writing the basis for its disagreement with their recommendations Pursuant to Chapter 268 Waterfront
Consistency Review.
§ 268-5. Review of actions.
In the event the LWRP Coordinator's recommendation is that the action is inconsistent with the LWRP, and the agency
makes a contrary determination of consistency, the agency shall elaborate in writing the basis for its disagreement with
the recommendation and state the manner and extent to which the action is consistent with the Ll4/RP policy standards.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written
determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney
Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney
~. New Yorff, State Department of Environmental Conservation
'Division of Water
Bureau of Flood Protection and Darn Safety, 4~h Floor
625 BroadWay, Albany, New York 12233-3504
Phone: (518) 402-8185 . FAX: (518) 402-8082
Website: www.dec.state,ny.us
Alexander B. Grannis
Commissioner
April 15, 2008
James F. King, Jr., President
Board of Trustees, Town of Southold
Town Hall Annex Building
54375 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Dear Trustee King:
Lauren Standish of your office has alerted the Coastal Erosion Management (CEM)
Section that the Town Trustees office is expecting additional information from the Department
relating to a site visit on October 17, 2007. The site visit was attended by Joanne Parker of the
Albany CEM section, NYDEC Stony Brook CEM representative, Eric Star and me. The visit
was also attended by Town of Southold representatives Jill Dougherty, Peggy Dickerson, Heather
Cusack and Mark Terry.,
The email received from Lauren Standish requests information identifying the natural
protective feature that was mapped and how the mapped feature relates to the State's Coastal
Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA) regulations in respect to the review of a specific application
(Robert F. Bombara- SCTM#54-4-19).
As discussed on the site and in subsequent telephone conversations, th~ landward limit
line of the nathral protective feature area (a.k.a CEHA line) was mapped based on the
determination that the primary dune was the most landward natural protective feature. North Sea
Drive was built on a portion of this primary dune. During the initial mapping phase which
occurred over twenty years ago and was concluded by public hearing, a decision was made to
place the CEHA line along the north edge of North Sea Drive instead of continuing further
landward to a point 25 feet from the landward toe.
The Department encourages municipalities to ask questions about CEM related issues
that assist in their ability in administering local CEM programs. The Department accomplishes
this through training, community assessment visits (CAV's), email, correspondence, and by
conversations with staff. However, the Department usually does not review a specific
application that is under review by a local authority in order to allow for a municipality to
independently perform such a review internally.
In regard to the application provided, I assume that this is a specific application that the
Town is currently reviewing. The limited information that has been provided to the Department
indicated that there were two lots with proposals for new construction. One lot had an existing
house on it and one lot was vacant. There are a number of different scenarios of how the
regulations would be applied which all depend on the specific limitations of each lot (such as lot
size and configuration) and what exactly is being proposed.
Assuming only 6 NYCRR Part 505 regulations are in place (Southold's local law should
be at least, as restrictive) any new construction resulting in 25% or greater of an increase in
existing footprint is prohibited. In other words, if the proposed ground coverage of structure is to
be expanded by 25% or greater than the ground coverage of the existing structure (on the date
CEHA regulations became effective in Southold, 6/20/1991), then the proposed construction
would be considered a prohibited activity. If the proposed ground coverage, including all other
additions since the promulgation of CEHA regulations in the Town is less than 25% of the
original existing structure footprint, then the Town could consider issuing a permit for the
proposal under its local CEM program.
Before a permit could be issued, the Town would have to revicw the proposal by applying
permit issuance standards [Southold, § 111-9. Issuance ofpermit.] and assr!re that the proposal
will meet all of them. Those standards require that the proposed regulated activity:
A. Is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternativcs to the proposed
activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location.
B. Is not likely to cause a measurable increase in erosion at the proposed site and at
other locations.
C. Prevents, if possible, or minimizes adverse effects on natural protective features
and their fimctions and protective values, existing erosion protection structures
and natural resources.
After applying permit issuance st.andards to a proposal, it is possible that the regulated activity
could be denied or only allowed in a more landward location (for example: out of the crest of the
dune and placed behind the landward toe) in order to satisfy all of the standards. In the area of
North Sea Drive, a main consideration would be to keep development as landward as possible
and out of the crest of the dune since the road limits any further landward location.
Any demolition and reconstruction of existing structure is considered new construction.
New construction is prohibited in natural protective feature areas. Also, as previously
mentioned, additions resulting in an increase in ground coverage 25% or greater ~re also
prohibited and could only be approved by meeting all variance requirements. [Southold, § 111-20.
Variances from standards and restrictions]. When applying for a variance, an applicant needs to'
provide a description of the um~ecessary hardship or practical difficulty as well as arguments for
how the proposal will meet all of the variance requirements which are listed below:
A. No reasonable, prudent, alternative site is available;
All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural
systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity's
design at the property owner's expense;
The development will be reasonably safe fi'om flood and erosion damage;
The variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical
difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance;
Where public funds are utilized, the pnblic benefits must clearly outweigh the
long-term adverse effects.
Some of this information has already been supplied in a letter that was mailed to Heather
Cusack on December 12, 2007. I'm forwarding to you that letter again (attached) for the
purpose of providing additional information on this topic.
If you have any questions regarding this matter or coastal erosion management, please
contact me at 518-402-8147.
Sincerely,
Robert McDonough
Environmental Program Specialist
Coastal Erosion Management Section
Enclosures
c. w/Enc:
Jill Doherty, Vice-President, Board of Trustees, Toxvn of Southold
Peggy A. Dickerson, Trustee, Board of Trustees, Town of Southold
Dave Bergen, Trustee, Board of Trustees, Town of Southold
Bob Ghosio, Jr., Trustee, Board of Trustees, Town of Southold
Lauren Standish, Secretarial Assistant, Board of Trustees, Town of Southold
Elizabeth Cantrell, Clerk, Board of Trustees, Town of Southold
Eric Star, NYSDEC Region 1 CEM Representative
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.
Southold, NY 11971
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone:631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
To: Kieran Comoran, Assistant Town Attorney
Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney
From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner/LWRP Coordinator
Scott Hilary, Planner/LWRP Coordinator
Date: October 1, 2008
Re: 2na revision for ROBERT G. BOMBARA SCTM#54-4-19
Attached, please find the 2~d revision for the LWRP review of the above referenced parcel. The 1st
revision, which was copied to you, was amended from the original LWRP review dated November 15,
2006. The consistency determination of INCONSISTENT has not changed from the original review dated
November 15, 2006. The 1st revision references the "primary dune" as the natural protective feature of
concern rather than the "beach" as referenced in the original review. The 2nd revision adds the purpose of
Chapter 275, WETLANDS AND SHORELINE, which states: The purpose of Chapter 275~
WETLANDS AND SHORELINE is to regulate wetlands in order to maintain and contribute to the
following resource area values and the attributes and functions they posses: flood control~ erosion
and sediment control[ storm damage prevention and water pollution control. In addition~ the
following resource area values shall be maintained and protected: prevention of flood damage by
limiting of development in flood hazard areas; prevention of damage to structures and natural
resources as a result of erosion~ protection of coastal ecosystems~ minimizing the impact of new
development~ restoration and/or expansion on the resource area values listed above.
Please advise if you any concerns regarding the revised LWRP review of the above referenced parcel.
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.
Southold, NY 11971
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
Jim King, President
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry and Scott Hilary, LWRP Coordinators
Date: September 23, 2008 (REVISED from LWRP review dated November 15, 2006)
Proposed Coastal Erosion and Wetland Permit ROBERT G. BOMBARA
SCTM#54-4-19
Young & Young on behalf of ROBERT G. BOMBARA requests a Wetland Permit & Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a
single-family dwelling, detached garage, swimming pool and associated water supply and sewage disposal facilities. Located:
1725 North Sea Dr., Southold. SCTM#54-4-19
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code
and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the
LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our
recommendation that the proposed actions are INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Town of Southold LWRP
policy standards and NOT IN COMPLIANCE with Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS. Therefore,
the actions are INCONSISTENT with the LWRP.
The purpose of Chapter 111~ COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS is to regulate, in coastal areas, land use and
development activities so as to minimize or prevent dama~.e or destruction to man-made property~ natural protective
features and other natural resources and to protect human life. Further~ the purpose of Chapter 111 is to regulate new
construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from coastal hazard areas.
§ 111-4. Purpose.
The Town of SouthoM hereby assumes the responsibility and authority to implement and administer a Coastal Erosion
Management Program within its jurisdiction pursuant to Article 34 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law. In
addition, it is the purpose of this chapter to:
Establish standards and procedures for minimizing and preventing damage to structures from coastal flooding and
erosion and to protect natural protective features and other natural resources.
Regulate, in coastal areas subject to coastal flooding and erosion, land use and development activities so as to
minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural
resources and to protect human life.
C.
Regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from areas of active
erosion and the impact of coastal storms to ensure that these structures are not prematurely destroyed or
damaged due to improper siting, as well as to prevent damage to natural protective features and other natural
resources.
D. Restrict public investment in services, facilities or activities which are likely to encourage new permanent development
in erosion hazard areas.
E. Regulate the construction of erosion protection structures in coastal areas subject to serious erosion to assure that
when the construction of erosion protection structures is justified, their construction and operation will minimize or
prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, private and public property, natural protectivefeatures and
other natural resources.
4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards.
A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion
hazards.
1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new
development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical.
The proposed actions do not have a functional relationship to coastal waters and therefore is not a water-dependent use
pursuant to § 275-2.
§ 275-2 Definitions; word usage.
WATER-DEPENDENT USES - An activity which can only be conducted on, in, over or adjacent to a water body because
such activity requires direct access to that water body, and which involves', as an integral part of such activity, the use of the
water. The uses include, but are not limited lo commercial and recrealional fishing and boating facilities, finfish and shellfish
processing, fish storage and retail and wholesale fish marketing facilities, waterfront dock facilities, shipyards and boat-
building facilities, navigation aides, basins and channels, industrial uses dependent upon waterborne transportation or
requiring large volumes of cooling or processing water and which cannot reasonably be located or operated at an inland site,
and uses which primarily provide general public access lo marine or tidal waters.
No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically
allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8.
The proposed actions are located entirely within the coastal erosion hazard area and the primary dune~ a natural
protective feature. A primary dune is defined in § 111-6 Definitions as a natural protective feature.
NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE -- A nearshore area, beach, bluff, primary dune, secondary dune or marsh and their
vegetation.
PRIMARY DUNE - The most waterward major dune where there are two or more parallel dunes within a coastal area. Where
there is only one dune present, il is the "primary" one. Occasionally one or more relatively small dune formations exist
waterward of the primary dune. These smaller formations will be considered to be part of the "primary dune"for the purposes
of this chapter. The waterward limit ora primary dune is the landward limit of its fronting beach. The landward limit of the
primary dune is 25feet landward o fits landward toe.
Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard
Areas.
Provide sufficient lot depth to allow relocation of structures and maintenance of required
setbacks over a period of thirty years.
A site visit of the property of Robert G. Bombara SCTM#54-4-19 was conducted on October 17~ 2007. In attendance at
the site visit among others~ were representatives of the Town of Southold Board of Trustees~ LWRP Coordinator Mark
Terry and NYS DEC's Environment Program Specialist Robert McDonough, which confirmed that the proposed
actions are entirely located seaward of the CEHA line and within a primary dune (*see attached letter referencing the
same, dated April 15, 2008, signed by Robert McDonough, Environmental Program Specialist-Coastal Erosion
Management Section*).
4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features.
Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced.
Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited.
A. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant
portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. Natural protective features area nearshore areas, beaches, dunes, bluffs, and wetlands
and associated natural vegetation.
The natural protective feature area as defined in § 111-6 Definitions is a land and/or water area containing natural
protective features such as a primary dune.
NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE AREA -- A land and/or water area containing natural protective features the
alteration of which might reduce or destroy the protection afforded other lands against erosion or high water or lower
the reserve of sand or other natural materials available to replenish storm losses through natural processes.
New construction is prohibited in natural protective feature areas (primary dune). Only nonmaior additions to
existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to § 111-13.
§ 111-13. Dune area.
Dunes prevent overtopping and store sand for coastal processes. High, vegetated dunes provide a greater degree of protection
than low, unvegetated ones. Dunes are of the greatest protective value during conditions of storm-induced high water. Because
dunes often protect some of the most biologicaily productive areas as well as developed coastal areas, their protective value is
especially great. The key to maintaining a stable dune system is the establishment and maintenance of beachgrass or other
vegetation on the dunes and assurance of a supply of nourishment sand to the dunes.
The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in dune areas:
A. In primary dune areas:
(1) Excavating, grading or mining of primary dunes is prohibited.
Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited Any deposition requires a
coastal erosion management permit.
All deposilions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be
placed so as to increase the size of, or restore, a dune or dune area.
Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific
wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department.
Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management
permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on the
primary dune.
Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the
waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their
fronting beaches.
The distance from the proposed actions to the natural protective feature (primary dune) is 0 feet~ a minimum setback
distance of 100 feet is required pursuant to Chapter ~ 275-3. Findings~ purpose~ jurisdictionl setbacks. Please require
that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policies to the greatest extent practicable~ minimizing
damage or destruction to man-made properW~ natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect
human life.
Policy 6 Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southoid ecosystem
6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands.
A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations
for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction
1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions.
§ 275-3 Findings; purpose; jurisdiction; setbacks.
C. Jurisdiction: The following areas are subject to protection under Chapter 275 of the Code of Southold.
(1) Any freshwater wetland, tidal wetland, beach, bluff, dune, flat, marsh, swamp, wet meadow, bog, or vernal
pool;
D. Setbacks.
1) The following minimum setbacks apply to any and all operations proposed on residential property within thc
jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees:
(a) Wetland boundary.
Ill Residence: 100 feet.
If the Agency, Town of Southold Board of Trustees makes a contrary determination of consistenc¥~ the Agency shall
elaborate in writing the basis for its disagreement with their recommendations Pursuant to Chapter 268 Waterfront
Consistency Review.
§ 268-5. Review of actions.
H. In the event the LWRP Coordinator's recommendation is that the action is inconsistent with the LWRP, and the agency
makes a contrary determination of consistency, the agency shall elaborate in writing the basis for its disagreement with
the recommendation and state the manner and extent to which the action is consistent with the L WRP policy standards.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written
determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney
Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney
To: Town of Southold Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry,
Senior Environmental Planner
LWRP Coordinator
Date: November 15, 2006
Re;
Proposed Coastal Erosion and Wetland Permit ROBERT G. BOMBARA
SCTM#54-4-19
Young & Young on behalf of ROBERT G. BOMBARA requests a Wetland Permit & Coastal Erosion Permit to
construct a single-family dwelling, detached garage, swimming pool and associated water supply and sewage
disposal facilities. Located: 1725 North Sea Dr., Southold. SCTM#54-4-19
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold
Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the
information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the
records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the denoted
following Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP.
4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards.
Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding
and erosion hazards.
1. Avoid development other than water-dependant uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new
development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as
practical.
a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as
specifically allowed under the relevam portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8.
b. Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal
Erosion Hazard Areas.
c. Provide sufficient lot depth to allow relocation of structures and maintenance of
required setbacks over a period of thirty years.
4.2
Protect and restore natural protective features.
Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and
enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited.
A. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under
the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. Natural protective features are nearshore areas, beaches, dunes,
bluffs, and wetlands and associated natural vegetation.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE
~se/~i[on is located seaward of thc
as h nd 275 of the
MARTIN H. SIDOR
BEel~d~lRCal~Tte ~.~taonsolidated earth
tooJOBOP<he ~OVdllt~D~ichever is' most w~
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
South old, NY 11971
ina and seaward of thegN:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
the mean Iow-wa~di~d~t~s Ave. )
ne or bluff exists landward
landward limit of a beach is 100 feet landwar~ ~here there is a marked change in material or
physiographic form or from the line of permanent veg~ ~ichever is most waterwaraT. ~l~iPblgt~d~,f~]e~'1938
seasonal or more frequent overwash or inundation are considered to be "beaches." Fax: 631 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
Policy 6 Protect and restore the quality an~e~o~)~f ~ ~ff,-~i~ofL~l~uthold ecosystem
6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands.
A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the 'Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and
regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction
Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit
conditions.
The proposed distance from the house and pool to the natural protective feature {beach) is 0 feet~ a minimum
setback distance of 100 feet is required pursuant to Chapter § 275-3. Findiw,s: ournose: jurisdiction:
setbacks. Please require that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policy to the greatest
extent possible.
Further~ the proposed action is not permitted pursuant to Chapter § 111-12.
§ 111-12. Beach area.
Beaches buffer shorelands from erosion bv absorbin~ wave eneruv that otherwise would be exnended on
the toes of bluffs or dunes. Beaches that are hinh and wide nrotect shorelands from erosion more effectively
than beaches that are low or narrow. Beaches also act as reservoirs of sand or other unconsolidated
material for Inno~hore littoral transport and offshore sandbar and shoal formation. The following
restrictions apply to regulated activities in beach areas:
A. Excavating, grading or mining, which diminishes the erosion protection afforded by beaches is nrohibited.
B. Clean sand or gravel of an equivalent or slightly larger grain size is the only material which may be
deposited within beach areas. Any deposition will require a coastal erosion mananement hermit, which may
be issued only for expansion or stabilization of beaches.
C. Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed unless such disturbance is pursuant to a
specific wildlife management activity aonroved, in writing, by the Denartment.
D. All development is prohibited on beaches unless specifically nrovided for by this chatter
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written
determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.