Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-58.-2-11 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To~ MEMORANDUM James Dinizio, Jr., Chair Town of Sonthold Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner 1~ LWRP Coordinator Date: January 9, 2008 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 6109 (Diack) The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The distance to the proposed house from the tidal wetland boundary is 80 feet; the proposed rear decking is 64 feet from the wetland boundary[ a minimum setback distance of 100 feet from the wetland line is required pursuant to Chapter 275-3.Findings~ purpose~ iurisdiction~ setbacks. In addition~ a minimum setback distance of 100 feet is required pursuant to Chapter .~ 280-116 A.2 Lots adjacent to Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound. (2)Exce, ot as otherwise provided in Subsection A(1) hereof, all buildings or structures located on lots adjacent to sounds shall be set back not less than lOO feet from the ordinary high-water mark of said sound. Please require that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policy to the greatest extent practical. If the action is approved and to further Policy 5: Protect and Improve Water quail .ty in the Town of Southold: 1. Retain a non-turf, non disturbance buffer landward of the timber bulkhead to protect the water quality of Long Island Sound. 2. Require hay bales during construction. 3. Require gutters to drywells to contain roof runoff. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. MT/hkc Office I~gcation: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 USPS Mailine Address: 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY l 1971-0959 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 6109 (Diack) Dear Mark: November 27, 2007 We have received an application to relocate and make additions/alterations to premises on Long Island Sound in Southold and shown on the enclosed site map. Copies of the LWRP form and area map are also attached for your use and reference. May we ask for your assistance in an evaluation and recommendations for this proposal. Thank you. Very truly yours, JAMES DINIZIO, JR. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Fee: $ Office Notes: Filed By:. For Office Use Only Date Assigned/Assignment No. /t O ~ Parcel Location: House No. 1840 Street Leeton Drive Hamlet Southold SCTM 1000 Section 58 Block.02 Lot(s) 11 Lot Size n,6~0sq, t~. Zone District R-40 I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: October ll~U~ 2007 Applicant/Owner(s): Missy Diack Mailing Address: 1840 Leeton Drive; Southold~ NY 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-2306 NOTE: If applicant is not the owner, state if applicant is owner's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. Authorized Representative: Address: Telephone: William J. Lohn- Suffolk Environmental Consulting~ Inc. P.O. Box 2003; Bridgehampton~ NY 11932 631.537.5160 Please specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names: [] Applicant/Owner(s) [] Authorized Representative [] Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED September 24tu~ 2007 FOR: [] Building Permit [] Certificate of Occupancy [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy [] Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Construction [] Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article: XXll Section: 280 Subsection: 116.A.2 Section: Subsection: Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: [] A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. [] A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. [] Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section [] Reversal or Other A prior appeal [] has [] has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. Year Part A. AREA VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, because: The subject parcel is located in an R-40 Zone and contains 11.690 SF Sqid p~.~r,:, ,I fl, ,r ~q wi!!~ ~ii of the surrounding lots on Leeton Drive, are drastically undersized wbh respe( 1 requirements, The neighborhood is currently cornprised of dmilarly, if net larqe~ ~'i~ ~,.!1, dwellings situated as close, if not closer to the bulkheaded shoreline In odditiL~l~ proposal calls for the relocation of the existing dwelling 22' landward from it~: and the installation of a coded sanitary system in a conforming Iocatior~ Tb:~r !ar~ of this variance will not cause an undesirable change in the character al lh~ (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The benefit sought by the applicant is to construct a modest addition lo a bungalow in order to increase living space. The subject parcel, along with ~11 surrounding lots on Leeton Drive, are drastically undersized with respecl le dimer requirements rendering it impossible for development to meet the requisit~ the bulkheaded shoreline, because a lot of this size, according to §280~124.B, h requisite front yard setback of 35'. This combined with the requisite 100' setback yields a building envelope that is 20' deep This is an unworkable dim(>n i, a dwelling, and could ~n no way afford the property owner the desired modest expansion. Therefore, the benefit sought by the applicant in requesting setback relief cannot be achieved by any other means than the grontinq of th requested relief (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: No, The 40' of relief requested from § 280.] 16.A,2 is not substantial The subiecl approximately 155' deep. The requisite bulkhead and fronl yard selba¢ ks vi,Nd building envelope which is not a workable dimension for a dwelling, The exislin,4 being relocated 22' landward from its current position which will place it me~e I, any other existing dwelling on the seaward side of Leefon Drive. Accordingly th~., respectfully submits that the requested relief is not substantial, (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The granting of the variance will have no adverse effect or ~mpact ,>r~ the phvsi environmental conditions in the neighborhood considering that the prepos~ ,d of the surrounding improvements which have been shown to h(~ve no negatiw- physical and/or er~vironmental welFbeing of the ar~a In addition, the f~rep, dwelling resulting frem the relocation and addition is consistent in size siting neighboring improvements. Further, the existing dwelling has existed neighborhood for years with less conforming setbacks and it l~as not advers ,Iv physical and/or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. In addition dwelling will be served by a coded sanitary system in a conforming lecafio~ granting of this variance will not have an adverse effect or impact or~ environmental ( onditions in the neighborhood (5) Has the variance been self created? ( ) Yes, or ( X ) No. If not, is the construction existing, as built? ( ) Yes, or ( X ) No. The hardship is not self-created, but rather created by the Town ?hrougl~ implementation zoning restrictions which are difficult for pre-existing no~ improved lots to comply with in a reasonable manne~, (6) Additional information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirements: (attach extra sheet as needed) The intended goal of constructing the new dwelling and the dimensional constr,xi~ts ~? the lot make il difficult 1'o construct in a conforming location without plncing ~n un~lu~, burden on the applicant ~ This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ) Check this box and complete PART B, Questions on next page to apply USE VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Please consult your attorney.) Othenviea~ please proceed to the siQnature and notary area below. Sworn to before me this /~'~ ,200 /J (Notary Public) Matthew D. lvans Notary Public 0f New York No. 011V6053859 Quelified in SuH01k County C0mm[ssi0n Expires January 22, Signature o ppe gent (Agent must submit Authorization from Owner) ZBA App 9/30/02 Page 2 of 3 - Appeal Application Part B: REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE (if requested): N/A For Each and Every Permitted Use under the Zoning Regulations for the Particular District where the Project is Located (please consult your attorney before completing): 1. Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations for the particular district where the property is located, demonstrated by competent financial evidence. The applicant CANNOT realize a REASONABLE RETURN because: (describe on a separate sheet). 2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique because: 3. The alleged hardship does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood because: 4. The request will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood because: 5. The alleged hardship has not been self-created because: 6. This is the minimum relief necessary, while at the same time preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety and welfare of the community (Please explain on a separate sheet if necessary.) 7. The spirit of the ordinance will be observed, public safety and welfare will be secured, and substantial justice will be done because: (Please explain on a separate sheet if necessary.) ( ) Check this box and complete PART A, Questions on previous page to apply AREA VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Please consult your attorney.) Otherwise~ please proceed to the siqnature and notary area below. Sworn to before me this Owner) day of ,200__ (Notary Public) Signature of Appellant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit Authorization from ZBA APP 9/30/02 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Suffolk Environmental Consulting (Diack) PO Pox 2003 Bridgehamplsm, NY 11932 Please take re,rice that ytmr application dated Septemher 25, 2007 DATE: October 11,2007 Location of property 1840 Lccton Drive, Southold,,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Seclion 5/I Block2 Lotl_l Is returned herewith and disapproved on the Ibllowing grounds: 'i'he ~n'moscd construction, on this eonlbrmin~, 11.690 sauare foot rmrcel in the.R=40 District. is not I~crmittcd ptn'suant is not pc _m~_.i_tt~e~_~.g~a'~L~.~.3~o Article XXII. Section 200-116.A.2.. which states, "Exc~ot as ottmrwise urovid~d in St, bsextion A(I'I bereoll all buildines or structures Iocatc:d 03! 10ts adiae~at to thc sound nhall be ~thnek not less than 100 feet from thc ordinary high watermark of said sound." The as built decks ase-nt~ as heine ~-/- 60 IL'et I¥om the ordinary hlt, h water mark at the closest ooint. Note to Applitant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application my require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. For pcrmit to rclocatc and make additions aiM, olt~rations to an existine sine-.le family dwellino at 4-164 (9/95)-Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1- PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) ]. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. DIACK SEQR 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Town of Southold County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map) 1840 Leeton Drive; Town of Southold, NY (SCTM#: 1000-058-02 011) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Applicant proposes to relocate the existing dwelling landward of its current location, remove and existing wood deck, constmct a small addition to the east side of said dwelling, constmct a new wood deck landward of the existing wood deck to be removed and install a new attendant sanitary system. 7. AMOUNTOF LAND EFFECTED: Initially < 0. 1 acres Ultimately < 0 1 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes [] No If No, describe briefly A variance is required from the Southold ZBA for the proposed setback from the existing bulkhea&' Please note that the existint] dwelling is being relocated 22' landward of its current location. 9. WHAT tS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [~Residential []Industrial [-]Commercial I--]Agriculture []Park/Forest/Open space []Other Describe: Private single family residences with related appurtenances. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes r--[No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals NYSDEC; Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services; Town of Southold Trustees & ZBA. 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No ~f yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes [] No /I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.~HAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicent/spo~..~[~l~'-~7{~-'1~'~J']'li~/.~;>~h.~n..~-,.~SSuffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Date: October 15, 2007 Signature: ~,~.~.~ ~1 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER If yes, coordinate the review process and PART II- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by A~lency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD iN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 use the FULL EAF. [] Yes [] No ]3. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS iN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 if No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. [] Yes [] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archeological, historical or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitat, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or change in use or intensity of use of ~and or natural resources? Explain briefly: C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly: C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEA? []Yes E]No D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain briefly PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determifie whether it is substantial, large, important, or othe~vise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequafe[y addressed. If question D of Part II was checked yes, the determination and significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different From responsible officer) 2 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, thc preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 058 02 011 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoard [] Planning Dept. [] Building Dept. [] Board of Trustecs [] 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [] (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) [] (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: [] Nature and extent of action: Applicant wishes to redevelop the property which currently contains a single-family dwelling (700 sq. ft. +) situated 53'+ from the wetlands boundary; rear decking and walkways (488 sq. ft. _+) situated 34' _+ from the wetlands boundary; rear plat and walkways (330 sq. ft. _+) situated 5'+ from the wetlands boundary and a timber bulkhead (75' long) situated 8' from the wetlands boundary. Applicant wishes to relocate the existing single family dwelling landward and construct an addition (1,295 sq. ft. _+ overall) to be situated 80'+ from the wetlands boundary; rear decking (622 sq. ft._+) situated 64' _+ from the wetlands boundary; rear plat and walkways (411 sq. ft. +_) situated 5' + from the wetlands boundary; retaining wall to surround the proposed sanitary system within the front yard (127' long overall) situated 127' _+ from the wetlands boundary; and a gravel driveway (540 sq. ft. _+) situated 120'+ from the wetlands boundary. The timber bulkhead is proposed to be maintained Oin-place~. Attach additional sheets if necessary Location of action: 1840 Leeton Drive; Town of Southoid~ NY Site acreage: 0.27 acre ± Present land use: Improved with single-family dwelling and related appurtenances Present zoning classification: If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: MISSY DIACK (b) Mailing address: 1840 Leeton Drive; Town of Southold~ NY (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( 631 ) 765 - 2306 (d) Application number, if any: N/A Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No [] If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable As indicated within Policy 1, #Development that does not reinforce the traditional land use pattern of the Town of Southold would result in a loss of the community and landscape character of Southoldf ~ this project is a proposal to redevelop a currently improved property. The proposal, as designed~ will not result in any adverse effects to the surrounding environment in that the project will be situated further landward from the surface waters of Long Island Sound to the north. Againt subject properly and the surrounding neighborhood is comprised of older residential dwellings which have existed harmoniously within this area for years and have not resulted in any form of adverse effects to the surrounding environment. Accordingly, we believe that this project is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Policy 2 is not applicable in that subject lot and the surrounding neighborhood cannot be deemed a substantial historic and/or archaeological resources. Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 5 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal will not adversely impact the visual quality of the surrounding area in that the existing property has contained a single-family residence for approximately fifty (50) years without any evidence of resulting in adverse impacts to the neighborhood. In addition, the neighborhood itself is comprised of similarly sized properties, improved similarly for many years, and which also has not resulted in any form of adverse impacts to the surrounding area. Furthermore, this policy could not preclude both the legal creation of this property as a building lot, or the existing structures thereon, which are proposed to be both relocated further landward from the surface waters of Long Island Sound to the north and/or improved with additions. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject property is currently improved with a bulkhead within the northern section of subject property and has protected subject property from any and all flooding and/or erosion events since the improvement thereon. The proposal is to redevelop the existing structures thereon, and relocate same further landward from the surface waters of Long Island Sound, and therefore cannot be applicable to Policy 4. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. Sec LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal will comply with Policy 5 in that a more efficient sanitary system is proposed to be installed thereon, and at a greater distance than the existing septic system is located from the wetlands boundary, and that public water is to be utilized. Accordingly, this proposal will not only maintain the water quality and supply within the Town of Southold, but will improve conditions within the site with the installation of the more efficient sanitary system. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of thc Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable to Policy 6 in that the proposal will be for the relocation and improvement of existing structures thereon, further from the surface waters of Long Island Sound, and that no further encroachment to the wetlands will take place than which presently exists. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applieable Subject proposal is not applicable to ?olicy 7 in that the proposal will be for the relocation and improvement of existing structures thereon which will not result in any form of adverse effects to air quality. Accordingly, this proposal is not applicable with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve disposal and/or transportation of solid waste, hazardous waste~ toxic pollutants, petroleum products. Attach additional sheets if necessary PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subiect proposal is not applicable to this policy in that the proposal will not impede any access to the surface waters in and around subject property and/or become detrimental to the recreational use of the surrounding resources. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependence uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve a water-dependent use (i.e. marina, aquaculture, etc...). Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town Waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve any form of marine resource management (i.e. commercial fisheries~ recreational fisheriest aquaculture, etc...). Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve agricultural lands (i.e. the conversion of farmland, the establishment and/or maintenance of new coastal agricultural production, etc...) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve the conservation of energy resources on a commercial level and/or the promotion of alternative energy sources, proper maintenance of fuel storage facilities and/or the extraction of mineral extraction Attach additional sheets if necessary Created on 5/25/05 11:20 AM ~ER FORMER OWNER P. ES. [.AND AGE Form Tillable ] Tillable 2 Tillable 3 Woodland ]wampland Brushla~-.,,'~ ? iHouse Plot VL. FARM TOTAL DATE BUILDING CONDITION VILLAGE COMM. j IND. DISTRICT SUB. ACREAGE ~- ,Z70 TYPE OF BUILDING REM,~RKS NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Acre Value Per Acre Value Toro I M. Bldg. Extension Extension Extension Breezewa' L Garage Foundation Basement Ext. Walls Fire Place Bath Interior Finish Heat 2-,~' /~'~' Porch Attic Porch Rooms 1st Floor Patio Rooms 2nd Floor Driveway Applicant: DIACK APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) 10/15/2007 Date Prepared: I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: Thc applicant is proposimz to relocate the existing 25' x 28' one story_ dwelling 22' landward and 3.5' northeast from its current location, and remove an approximate lY x 14' wood deck which is currently attached to the seaward side of the existing dwelling. II. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: 17' x 35' Dimensions of new second floor: N/A Dimensions of floor above second level: N/A Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): 21' +/- Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: N/A III. Proposed Alterations or Interior Structural Changes without enlargement/extension (attach extra sheet if necessary) - Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: One Ill floor; three [3] bedrooms. IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 753 +/- SF Proposed increase of building coverage: 541 +/- SF Square footage of your lot: I 1,690 SF Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 11.06% +/- V. Purpose of New Construction Requested: To prnvide the applia~nt with a rnadent iner~nq~ in living apace VI. Please describe the land contours (fiat, slope %, etc.) as exist and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): ~r~ll~x~ O~t ~!~h ~ go~tly rr~!ng ?nrtlnn ;n th~ ~t~rn ~rtlcm Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show ail yard areas of proposed construction after staking corners for new construction), or photos of existing building area to be altered (area of requested changes). 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2006 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? [] Yes ~ No Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? 12 No [] Yes, please explain on attached sheet. 1) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Yes 2) Are these areas shown on the map submitted with this application? Yes 3) Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area? Yes 4) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Yes Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: A~>vrovedviaPermit#6716datedg/19/2007. and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved map. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No Am them any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? None (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state "none" on the above line, if applicable.) Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? No If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department and describe: Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? No the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. Ifyes, please label Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Single family dwelling and proposed use Same as "existing" (examples: existing: single-family; proposed: same with garage or pool, or other description.) Authorized Signature and Date 2/05; 1/07 DIA CK Property Situate: 1840 Leeton Drive; Town of Southold, New York SCTM #: 1000 - 058 - 02 - 011 EXISTING BULKHEAD EXISTING DWELLING % DIACK Property Situate: 1840 Leeton Drive; Town of Southold, New York SCTM #: 1000-058-02-011 Photo taken o~ July 9, 2007) Photo indicating the existing single-family dwelling and decking situated centrally within subject property, to be relocated further landward and expanded upon (i.e., addition). Photo taken from the northwestern section of subject property, facing southeast. Please note the staked out locations of the improvements. DIACK Property Situate: 1840 Leeton Drive; Town of Southold, New York SCTM #: 1000-058-02-011 (PIN)to taken on July 9, 2007) Photo indicating the existing single-family dwelling and decking situated centrally within subject property, to be relocated further landward and expanded upon (i.e., addition). Photo taken from the northwestern section of subject property, facing southeast. Please note the staked out locations of the improvements. DIACK Property Situate: 1840 Leeton Drive; Town of Southold, New York SCTM #: 1000 - 058 - 02 - 011 (Photo tal~n c.~ July 9, 2007) Photo indicating the staked out comer of the proposed rear decking. Photo taken from the existing rear decking/walkway, facing southeast, towards Leeton Drive. 058 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One SUNY at Stony Brook, 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, New York 11790-3409 Phone: (631)444-0365 · FAX: (631)444-0360 Webslte: www.dec.state.ny, us LETTER OF NO JURISDICTION - TIDAL WETLANDS ACT Alexander B. Grannis Commisioner Mildred Diack 1840 Leeton Drive Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application #1-4738-03736/00001 Diack Property, 1840 Leeton Drive, Southold S.C.T.M. #1000-58-2-11 August7,2007 Dear Ms. Diack: Based on the information you have submitted, the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has determined that: The property landward of the pre-existing (pdor to 8/20/77) bulkhead, which is more than 100 feet in length, as shown on the aerial photograph (exposure 70-1968 dated 6 APR 76) obtained from AereGraphics Corp., is beyond Article 25 (Tidal Wetlands Act) jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with the current Tidal Wetlands Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661 ) no permit is required. Be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the tidal wetlands jurisdictional boundary, as indicated above, without a permit. It is your responsibility to ensure that all precautions are taken to prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation within Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction which may result from your project. Such precautions may include maintaining adequate work area between the tidal wetland jurisdictional boundary and your project (i.e. a 15' to 20' wide construction area) or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hale bay berm. Please note that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies or local municipalities. Sincerely, ar~k ~rar~a Deputy Permit Administrator CC: Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. NYSDEC, Marine Habitat Protection file (kaf) James F. IZ-Ang, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. September 19, 2007 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To~vn Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Mr. Bruce A. Anderson Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 2003 Bridgehampton, NY 11932-2003 RE: MISSY DIACK 1840 LEETON DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 58-2-11 Dear Mr. Anderson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of MISSY DIACK applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated July 25, 2007, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policy 5 & 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: installation of gutters and drywells to contain roof runoff, a line of staked hay bales to be installed prior to construction, the area landward of the bulkhead remains non-turf, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on September 19, 2007, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of MISSY DIACK to relocate the existing single-family dwelling landward and construct an addition (1,295 sq. ft. overall) to be situated 80'+/- from the wetlands boundary; rear decking (622 sq. ft.) situated 64'+/- from the wetlands boundary; rear plat and walkways (411 sq. ft.+/-) situated 5'+/- from the wetlands boundary; retaining wall to surround the~proposed sanitary system within the front yard, situated 127'+/- from the wetland boundary; and a gravel driveway (540 sq. ft.) situated 120' from the wetlands boundary; and to maintain the timber bulkhead in-place, with the condition of the installation of gutters and drywells to contain roof runoff, a line of staked hay bales to be installed prior to construction, and the area landward of the bulkhead remains non-turf, and as depicted on the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, last dated September 24, 2007, and received on September 28, 2007. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $100.00 Very truly yours, James F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/eac BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 6716 DATE: SEPTEMBER 19~ 2007 1SSUED TO: MISSY DIACK PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1840 LEETON DRIVE~ SOUTHOLD SCTM# 58-2-11 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on September 19, 2007, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by Missy Diack and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: ~ Wetland Permit to relocate the existing single-family dwelling landward and construct an addition (1,295 sq. ft. overall) to be situated 80'+/- from the wetlands boundary; rear decking (622 sq. ft.) situated 64'+/- from the wetlands boundary; rear plat and walkways (411 sq. ft.+/-) situated 5'+/- from the wetlands boundary; retaining wall to surround the proposed sanitary system within the front yard, situated 127'+/- from the wetland boundary; and a gravel driveway (540 sq. ft.) situated 120' from the wetlands boundary; and to maintain the timber bulkhead in-place, with the condition of the installation of gutters and drywells to contain roof runoff, a line of staked hay bales to be installed prior to construction, and the area landward of the bulkhead remains non-turf, and as depicted on the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, last dated September 24, 2007, and received on September 28, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. Jame§W~ing - Absent Dave Bergen - Absent ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO TI-ES SURVEY I~ A VIOLATION OF S£CTI~V 7Z09 OF THE IVEI¢ YORK ST,4TE EDUCA TION LAW~ EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7gOg-SU~DIVlSION E. ALL CERTJFICA TIONS t~J~EON ARE VALe3 FOR T~S I,¢AP AND COPIES THEREOF 01~. Y IF .~4D I~A? OR CO?lES BEAR THE t~PRES.~.fl SEAL OF Tt~E SURVEYOR ADDITION~ALL Y TO COI~PL Y WITH SAD LAI¢ T~ T~ 'AL T~D OF ~NOT~ $~VEYOR'S MAP. TERMS ~UCH ~5 '~ECTED *~OU~HT-~O-fl~ ~' ARE NOT ~ CO~L~ WITH T~ LONG ISLAND ~ N. 44'15'00' E. SOUND 75.02' f- · SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN BY' JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. HOBART ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (631) 765 - ~954 PROPOSED SEWAGE DIS'PO$71L SYSTEM § POOLS WITH CLEAN SAND 3' COLLAR, I000 C~L, PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK BOTTOM OF ~ LEACHING FOOLS TO BE' ~' ABOVE CROUNDWA TEI~ S. 4fi'35'30' i ,~,, ~£~r ~_ 75.00' LEETON DRIVE ¢! ~.~ ( PUBLIC WA TER IN STREET) ~ 7 1800' e~ ~,5 6 [p,~bA~ wc~ter) CROSS SECTION SEPTIC SYSTEM FLOOD ZONES FROM FIRM MAP NO. 36t05C015~ G DA TED MA Y 4, 1998 ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NbvD. AREA = 11,690 sq. ft. to tie lind COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE FROM COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP Pholo # 56-566-83 NO TE' I, CONCRETE TO BE 3000 p~! ~, STEEL TO BE 60 ks! $. ENGINEER TO CERTIFY' THE FIN~41~ 'C. oNsTR~TIO~I ~ 'THE RETAKING EALL AS REO~ED BY T~ ~L TH DEP T, ENGINE~ ~0 BE C~LLED TO INSPECT'THE REINFORCING BEFORE BL~CEME~ T ~F CONC~ SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT SOUTHOLD ' ' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD , SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. 1000 - 58 - 02 - 11 rES r BORING ~ ~ ,* ~ r .~w! ~/ BY McDONaLD GEOSCIENCE ~L~: I = ~ 0'~ EL X ' '~ .... ' ' PALE BR. FINE AUG'. 17, ~S'~7 [CO~5'T~L ~R0%9'; ~Z4~D LINE) .-, I I 4117/07 /~/.__~ ~~.N.Y.S. UC. NO. 4961~ PECONIC StJR'~1~¥ORS~ P.C. - (631) 765 - 5020 FAX 1631) 765 - 1797 P. O. BOX 909 1230 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD, N. Y,. 11971 PRO~ a - ORYIFELL$ 6'~ - 5° DEE~ NOV 1 4 2007 J BOARD OF APPEALS ~o~F- l'1,0 4~ Z.O0 res ~o v-~ WALL MEW NALL- % dF~O" L 'i ~SY coo~ "' >.4",¢C t -i,J Ok/D EL ,4 EL ¢×¢>~; J ~_¢~ tO. PT ,Leu J 5 gENERAL NOTES HVAC 'NOTES WALL SHEATHING EEQUIREMENTS FOR. WIND LOADS: OTE~ ]ONSTRUCTION DETAILS & WiND LOAD PATH CON~gC]tON.~,ETAILS. RIDGE ~ TYP CAL,R~DGE TQRAFTER STRAPPING l'~._..~.~t t~;, B~, M~'Y~O, RAF'~ER S~.RA'Ppl~¢3 SlSTANT ( JCTtON CONNECTORS , GONNEGTtON LOCATION: PART, NUMBER: NOTES: RDGE,?TO_RAFTERS . LSTA24 NPPLY ,TO EACH PAI,R OF,RAF, TERS RAFTER_TO-WALL RT20 APPLY TO EACH RAFTER ~ APPLY TO EACH RAF~R RAFTER-TO-PLATE RTl5 (U~E WITH ,SpTH~ CONNECTOR) PLA~E~TQ-WALL STUD, SPTH~ A'PPL~ T0, [ACH WALL STUD ~D~ FL,~QB ,WA~-TQ-!,ST. FLOOR WALL KLFTA ~R MSTA3~ APPLy To E~gH WALL STU~ ~ HNABER_.~o.jACK STU.D. .gS~A~2 ,.. APPNY .TO ~AQH JACK ~TUP , C~PR~ S,~D-~,H~ADER RT5 ~ ,RT7 , ~L~ ~0 ~AC~$~IpP~E, ADS5 ,, AP~L~ T~ ,~,ACH StD[W~L EN~ 1ST. CLOOR-~4DER-SILL P'EATE MSTA36 0R RS16-R "W ~p ~ ~UBLE SILL PLA~ RAFTER TOP PLATE WALL STUD k rYP CALRAFTER TO WALL STUD CONNECTION JOIST BLOCKING O GIRDER "l'~p PLATE WALL STUD gAL ~r~rm_~,JAT/VE RAFTER TO WALL STUD CONN,E'33TtON PR0V!DE i/2" SPACING ~"w~ THE Ira9 STUD AND THE 2 ~ER S~UDS · , ,'-OR ALLOWING HOLDDOW', INSTALLATION SIDEWALL CONNECT C0~ER, STUD ' FASTE~ Wt~H (m) t~ COMMON NAILS @ 6' O.C.  USE WITH 3x3 SQUARE WASHERS ENDWALL (usP LBPSb~ OR BP583,) 8i,.IEAR,WA.LL C~. ENER CONNECTION 2ND. FLOOR WALL STUD 2ND. FLOOR PLATE 8UBFLOOR RIM BOARD WOOD JO[ST 1ST. FLOOR TOP PLATE~ GIRDER/HEADER WOOD JOIST lST FLOOR WALL STUD FRAMING OVER W.. OOD GIRDER ,, JOI~'FRAM!~G-FLUSH WIT~eIRDER/HEADER, lST. FLOOR WALL STUD KING STUDS CRIPPLE STUD HEADER JAGK STUDS T~PICAL MULTI-STORY CONNECTIONS TYPICAL HEADER CONNECTION ~~ ~ IST. FLOOR pLATE SILL G&ASKET SUBFLOOR WALL STUD WALL STUD RIM BOARD TERMITE SHIELD TOM PLATE ~1 ~ ~ ///~:::~:~ ~3TTO~ m~ ~ I I rrr'l ~ DBL. SILL PLATES SUB FLOOR ',~'"~"~"~-.~J I J .,~ RDUSLE E4kL PLAT£ BATHTUB ~ II I I ~" ~ BOUBLE JOIST ['TO OVERLAP JOINTS) DOUBLE JOIBT FOR UNDER A BATHTUB Of~ ~ t= JOt~T FOR NOI%~BEARING WALLB,, I~T. FLOOR TQ FOUNDATION CONNECTIONS DECK &:: PORCH CONSTRUCTION DETAILS & WIND LOAD PATH RAFTEP~~~ LEDGE RIDGE ~ RAFTER TYPICAL RIDGE TO RAFTER STRAPPING GIRDER/HEADER ~ POST/COLUMN GIRDER/HEADER ,TO POST/COLUMN CONNECTION GIRDER/HE POST/COLUN RAFTER TO WALL CONN£¢llON POST RIM/DECK JOI S~---~ RAFTE HEADE! /:q3s'r To DECK/PORCH CONNECTION CONNECTION DETAILS GIRDER/HE POST/COLL ALTERNATIVE RAFTER, TO HEADER coiTION STAIR TREA~~ STRINGER TO DEC, K/PORCH CONNECTION JOIS GIRDER/HEADER WIND RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION CONNECTORS ;ONNEOTION .LOCAAON P f,'~ T NUMBER '~OTES ~-x~-POST TO F. OO~NO ANCHOR PA~ OR WE~ ~AU~4: USE w/MIN. 1/2" DIA. x 7" ANCHOR BOLT 8x6" POST TO FOOTtN6 ANCHOR pAU66 OR ~66 ;AU66: USE w/MtN. I/2" DIA. x 7" ANCHOR BOLT ~x~ P~T TQ ~RDER~EADER ;BS~ / PB~,44 / KC~ USE ONE TYPE FOB EACH POST 6~8, POST TO GIROER/~ADER ~BS66 / P~66 / K686 USE ONE TYPE FOR EACH POST ~OST/0OEUMN TO OlR~/HE~ER LSTA12 ~ LSTA2~ USE (2~ FOR EACH POST/COLUMN STAIR S~Rt~R CONNECTION T~U26 ~ 'MPA1 USE ON EA~ SIRINGER ~FT~R/~]ST TO H~ER ~0~ ~T1D USE FOR EACH RAFTER )SE ON EACH RA~TER. MPA} U~ ONLY ~AF~R TO tEDGER BOARD ~U26 OR MPA1 ~ERE TMU26,CAN NOT BE uSED THE FOLLOWING Oh ~pPEO~,~O USP N~TAL CO~NNECTORS FOR PROPER WIND ~OLLOW, MANUF~CTURE'$ RECOMENDEO INSTALLATION NSTRUC'~ONS TO ACHEV~ MAXIMUM UPLIFT LOAD CAPACITY, NAILING SCHEDULE RAs-~TO ~ZWAL~ ~COMMON EACH rOE-~L ~ ~ P~ I~W~U ~C~ ~, over P~, ~ - s~c ~ COLOR ~ ~ ~C~ TO ~R ~CM - 8~ END ~ ~ 2 - ~ ~N ENO GIRDER/HEADER, TO POST/COLUMN CONNECTION GIRDER- CONCRETE 12"xl 2"x12" GIRDER TO CONCRETE PIER CONNECTION ~RDER/HEADER TO POST/COLUMN CONNECTION JOI,ST TO,GIRDER/HEADER CONN,ECTtON POST~ CONCRETE FOOTI POST TO FOOTING CONNECTION FRAMING FI USH WITH GIRI~ER/HEADER DECK AND COVEREDNOTES: CLIMATItC & GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN FLOOD ZONF CONS I RUCT ON AS PER N.Y.S. RES. CODE R527 FLOOD VENT BLOCK OR .POURED INSTALLATIO:N INSTRUCTIONS 16-1/4-" ROUGH EXTERIOR INTERIOR WALL 8~ IO/¢;NtNO 8-1 SHOWN OPEN · IN FRAME TRAPS, GO BEbUND WAI.J. AND CAN BE BROKEN OFF AT SLOTS TO AVOID OBSTRLK:TIONS 1 MAX 2"x15-1/4" OP[N 15-1/4" OPEN OTTOM .STRAPS · · BEHIND- WALL EXTERIOR VIEW FINAL GRADE " SIDE SECTION VIEW t.. Prepare a CLEAN 16-1/4" wide by 8.-1/.4[,high rou. gh...?pe.nin~.,lgr each vent (1 blo~k ~ide x 1 b~ck high) wroth the bott~ of the ham no morff men ~ ooo~-~neo gc~e .... 2, Measure wall thickness and bedd (more th~ gO,T) 4 S~$'bt ~t S~t to the mea~rement frqm pain[aa eno. 3, Remo~ door from frame. (turn upsidp ~w~., rot~e ~o[[gm of dqg~ qut~(d o~d ~M~out 9f slots) . , . 4. insert two sires into two top sets of slots m f¢e~ ~r~ r~., After ~ ~,mrougn re~ set ONLY PU~ STRAPS ONE CLI~K INTO FRONT SLOTS. Stm~s sh~u[¢ ha~ ben[ egs ~mn~ ng up, 5. Caulk ~ay be applied beh~od front frame fledge., ~lt fram8 '~ t~¢ ~ ?to well o~me firs[ with s~r~ legs oin beh~d walt above opening. P~h frame m~o opting se front,~g~ ~.tight t9 ~u~e.8~ w~l., .... ~. R~ach through frame open ng aha ~nst¢,l two oe~ts~8 through t.~o ~,[,~m~s o~ a~[s m ~[~e, tr~pp~ng wau between front flange.and bent str?p; ~queeze, elt S~t[~ ~¢t. Fr~ s~out~ be hush to wail face and secure. 7. Check that (rome ~s square ona. sJo[s ore ~eor or apr~s, mor~o[ g~cou~. . . , _ . 8. Instoff door nra frame by gro~mg bott~ of d~ (~hptqstfc ~) ond?~t (~ith s~fler squ~res) ~ng up. Slide poor in~o frame such ~ot metal pins on each ~¢.8t~e IR~-~Jpt) Rn ~)~.of(r~. Let th8 agar ~ioe down following the path of the 8lo[~, until [hey ore at th~ bottom.of J~Q ~ m ~Q¢ o~m~x . ...... 9. Let t~ bat[om of the door go ~o that trio door rotot~ ~n ~[~ me ~e. ~k that d¢~ ~ latches on oo~h 1.1 SUMMARY A. This S~ctton tneludes Unit masonry es{emblies consisting of the follow,g: 1. Fl~d vents 1,,2 ~ALITY ~RA~ ~, g~f~rm~:to ~lJ~le ~CA, SBCCI, ICBO, ~d ICC c~e for automatic f~gd venting requirements, PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 FLOOD VENTS A, Generoh Provide out. omoUc opening two-way single he,ight and double height vent activated by flood w~ters to relieve unbak3nced lateral forces on foundoUon walls. B, M~nlmum Opening: Ability to pose objects up to 3 inches (75 mm) in diameter. C. Size: Designed to fit openings in modular masonry con,struction. 1. Single Height: 16 x 8 inches (400 x 200 mm). 2. Double Height: 16 x 16 inches (400 x 400 mm). D. Frame, Vent, and Louver Moterioh Stainless steeI, Type 3t6, formed and welded construction. E. Vent: Pivoting, solid insulated face. perforated face for ventilation, removable. 1. Free Area (VentltaUon): 1/4- inch (6 mm) square perforations; single: 50 sq. in. (0,032 sq. m.). doubie: 100,sq. in, (0,064 sq. m.) .... 2. Free Area (Flood Relief): single 200 sq. in. (0.129 sq. m,), doubte: 400 sq. in. (0,258 sq, m.). 3, Louvers: Automatic ventilation louvers with bimetal operator. 4. V~t Operation: Sealed float releases vent on rising and failing water, F. installation Anchors: Stainless steel straps, four for each vent. No installation tools required. g, M~intenance Teals: Requires thin blade to release float pins. H. Products: Subject to compliance with requirements, provide one of the following: I. Smart VENT manufactured by Smart VENT, Inc. PART 3 '- E)~ECUTM3N 5.1 FLOOD VENT A. G:ene, c~h Inetctlt flood vents in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, spaced evenly around foundation perimeter, maximum 12 inches above grade to bottom of vent. B, Install one single height flood vent for every 200 sq. ft. of enclosed space below flood plain. C. Instalt one double height flood vent for every 4.00 sq, ft. of enclosed space below flood ploln. D. Adjust flood vents for proper opere~ton.